EPA/600/D
87-308
Kentula, M.E. 1987. Does mitigation work?: EPA's Wetlands
Research Program is checking, p. 2-6. IN: Proceedings of
the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Wetlands Restoration and
Creation. F.J. Webb (ed.). Hillsborough Community College,
Tampa, Florida.

-------
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH ANNUAL
CONFERENCE ON WETLANDS
RESTORATION AND
CREATION
May 14-15, 1987
Sponsored by
Hillsborough Community College
Institute of Florida Studies
Frederick J. Webb, Jr.
Editor
Hillsborough Community College
1206 North Park Road
Plant City, Florida 33566

-------
KEYNOTE ADDRESS
DOES MITIGATION WORK?:
EPA'S WETLANDS RESEARCH PROGRAM IS CHECKING
By:
Mary E. Kentula
Project Scientist
Wetlands Research Program
Northrop Services, Inc.
200 S.W. 35th Street
Corvallis, Oregon 97333
2

-------
EPA'S WETLANDS RESEARCH PROGRAM
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted in January
of 1986 a Wetlands Research Plan (Zedler & Kentula 1986). The Plan
outlined research to (1) define the water quality functions of wet-
lands; (2) develop a method to assess and predict the cumulative
impacts associated with the incremental loss of wetlands; and (3)
provide support for Agency personnel faced with decisions concerning
mitigation for permitted wetland losses through creation or restora-
tion .
The research program was funded in April 1986. The Environmental
Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia was given responsibility for the
water quality research. Responsibility for the cumulative impact and
mitigation research was given to the Environmental Research Laboratory
in Corvallis, Oregon. The Mitigation Research Component is the subject
of this paper.
THE MITIGATION RESEARCH COMPONENT
The creation or restoration of wetlands is often required as
compensation for wetland losses permitted under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. Created and restored wetlands represent a range of
conditions and situations. Many are small in size, often less than an
acre. However, some, as in the restoration of areas impacted by
mining, are hundreds of acres. Many occur in urban areas and reflect
the influence of high population densities. Others, mostly the result
of highway construction, occur in rural settings. Sometimes attempts
are made to create wetlands that look as natural as possible. Others
look obviously man-made. Despite the size, setting or appearance, the
question remains: How well do these created and restored wetlands
replace the ecological functions of the wetlands that were destroyed?
This question is central to the Mitigation Research Component.
Although there are other forms of mitigation that could be considered
in the program, the effectiveness of mitigation through the creation
and restoration of wetlands is of great concern. The number of these
projects is constantly increasing, while the science of wetland
creation and restoration is considered to be in its infancy.
OVERVIEW
The Mitigation Research Component has two goals. They are to
determine the ecological functions of created and restored wetlands,
and improve project design. Ultimately, the results of the research
will be compiled into a mitigation handbook for Agency 404 personnel.
It will be designed to provide guidelines by which to (1) evaluate the
probability that a proposed project will succeed, (2) formulate permit
conditions, i.e. set goals, and (3) determine if a project met those
goals. To gather the needed information, research has been initiated
3

-------
to synthesize existing information and evaluate completed projects.
Research Project #1 - Synthesis of Information
Efforts are underway to synthesize two types of information on
wetland creation and restoration. One focuses on the information
contained in the literature; the other on that in the 404 permit
record.
The literature synthesis will serve as provisional guidance until
the first version of the handbook is produced. Since much of the
information on wetland creation and restoration is not contained in the
scientific literature, the goal is to assemble information from as many
sources as possible, including personal experience.
A group of eminent wetlana scientists has been commissioned to
produce the document. They are primarily people who have worked on
various aspects of wetland creation and restoration. Dr. Jon Kusler of
the Association of State Wetland Managers and I coordinate the effort.
The document will be composed of two sections. The first will be
a series of theme papers covering the wide range of topics of general
application to wetland creation and restoration. These topics include
succession and stability of created and restored wetlands, an overview
of wetland evaluation, and applications for creating wetlands for
waterfowl management. The second will be a series of regional reviews.
These will discuss the status of the science of wetland creation and
restoration for wetlands of various types in different regions of the
country. The authors will also identify information gaps and research
needs. These will be reviewed by members of the National Wetland
Technical Council which will then recommend research priorities for the
program.
A compilation of information from the 404 permit record will be
used to characterize patterns arid trends in permit-related wetland
creation and restoration and identify completed projects for evalua-
tion. To facilitate the process, a data management system was design-
ed. The system runs on an IBM-compatible personal computer equipped
with DataBase III or III+. Essentially, the commercial program was
customized to streamline data entry and, thus, eliminate errors.
During the past year, the system was tested by contractors assem-
bling databases of projects in EPA Region X (Oregon, Washington and
Idaho) and California, and freshwater projects in Texas, Arkansas,
Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi. It is now being revised. The
software and user's manual will be available by the end of the calendar
year.
Preliminary analysis of the databases from Washington and Oregon
indicates that over 90% of the projects occur West of tne Cascade
Mountains and in the vicinity of urban centers. Estuarine intertidal
4

-------
(salt marshes and mudflats) and palustnne (emergent marshes and ponds)
are the wetland types most often created or restored. In addition,
these databases have been used to select complete projects for evalua-
tion .
Research Project #2 - Evaluation of Completed Projects
Completed wetland creation and restoration projects are being
treated as "experiments in progress." The goals are to compare
characteristics of created and restored wetlands with those of natu-
rally occurring wetlands and determine how those characteristics change
with time. An approach to conducting the evaluations is currently
being tested in pilot studies in Washington, Oregon and Florida.
The first step is to identify the "test" population by searching
the permit database for groups of completed projects that might form a
sampling unit. For example, in Oregon the test population identified
is a group of twelve, created, emergent marshes less than a hectare in
size, ranging in age from six months to six years, in an urban area of
the Willamette Valley.
Next, a set of reference sites are selected. A stratified random
sample is made of naturally occurring wetlands with characteristics
defined by the test population. Again, in Oregon this was a group of
emergent marshes less than a hectare in size occurring in the urban
areas of the Willamette Valley.
Finally, the sites are evaluated. Plant community structure,
substrate, water quality and hydrologic variables are sampled. Where
possible, various methods of sampling the same variable are used. The
data obtained will be used to test the usefulness of various methods
and the consistency of the results obtained when they are used by
different individuals.
The following will report the results of the research described
above:
RESULTS FROM THE FIRST YEAR OF THE PROGRAM
Literature Synthesis
Permit Database Software and User's Manual
Early 1988
Fall 1987
Patterns and Trends in the 404 Permit
Record—Washington, Oregon, California
Fall 1988
Patterns and Trends in the 404 Permit
Record—Freshwater Projects in Texas,
Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi
Early 1989
5

-------
Procedure for Selection of Reference Sites
Summer 1987
Results of Pilot Study to Test Method to
Evaluate Mitigation Sites—Washington and
Oregon
Summer 1988
Results of Pilot Study to Test Method to
Evaluate Mitigation Sites—Florida
Fall 1986
CONCLUSIONS
EPA's Research Plan set program research goals in relation to the
plans and efforts of other groups. Since there are many unanswered
questions and limited resources with which to seek the answers, it is
important that duplication is avoided. Therefore, the Wetland Research
Program has an information transfer component to disseminate its
findings and collect those of other researchers. A mailing list is
maintained and a flier that briefly describes the Program's progress is
distributed. Those interested in being included on the mailing list or
in supplying information on their research should contact the Wetland
Research Program at the Environmental Research Laboratory, 200 S.W.
35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333; phone: (503) 757-4666, FTS 4204666.
The first year of EPA's Wetland Research Program has been busy.
The products described above are in various stages of completion.
However, even with all this activity the answer to the question, "Is
mitigation working?," is only beginning to be answered. Hopefully,
with the efforts of the Wetlands Research Program and that of other
scientists working in the field, the next time a report on the Pro-
gram's progress is given there will be more of an answer.
Zedler, J. B. and M. E. Kentula. 1986. Wetlands research plan.
EPA/600/3-86-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. National Technical
Information Service Accession Number PB86 158 656/AS.
LITERATURE CITED
6

-------