SUPERFUND
Records Of Decision
Update
From: Hazardous Site Control Division	January 31, 1986
To: EPA Regional Offices	Vol. 2, No. 1
ROD SUMMARIES
BOG CREEK FARM,
REGION II,
NEW JERSEY
(Approved 9/30/85)
Description:
•	The site was owned by in-
dividuals who also owned a
paint manufacturing plant. In
1973 and 1974, the owners
allegedly dumped bulk liquids
and sludges in a trench onsite.
The original volume of wastes
is estimated to be 2,400 cubic
yards, with high concentra-
tions of volatile organics (as
high as 180,000 ppm for
toulene). Residential wells are
not threatened. A small bog
and pond are heavily con-
taminated.
Decision:
•	Remove contaminated water
and sediments from pond and
bog, regrade and cover; treat
wastewater.
•	Excavate contaminated mater-
ials with greater than 10,000
ppm VOC, incinerate.
•	Cap and fence site.
•Analyze other potential
remediation activities, in-
cluding soil washing, for addi-
tional contaminated soils.
Issues:
•	Soil washing to be explored as
further remedial measure for
soils with less than 10,000
ppm VOCs.
Contacts.
•	Region: Eric Swartz
FTS 264-1253
•	Headquarters: John Kingscott
FTS 382-7996
D'IMPERIO PROPERTY,
REGION II,
NEW JERSEY
(Approved 3/27/85)
Description:
•	This historic dumping site con-
tains waste both at the surface
and buried in the soil. The soil
and ground water are contam-
inated. Wetlands abut the site
on two sides.
Decision:
•	Excavate contaminated soils
and wastes and dispose of
these offsite.
•	Extract and treat ground water
from two aquifers using pre-
cipitation, flocculation, sedi-
mentation, and steam strip-
ping technologies; discharge
treated water into surface or
ground water
•	Cap site to RCRA standards
Issues:
•	Site is environmentally sen-
sitive area and will affect deci-
sion regarding the location of
treated discharge
Contacts:
•	Region Don Lynch
FTS 264-8216
•	Headquarters: John Kingscott
FTS 382-7996
ACME SOLVENTS,
REGION V,
ILLINOIS
(Approved 9/27/85)
Description:
•	Solvents, paints, empty drums,
and residues from solvent
reclamation were stored on-
site. In 1972, these materials
were pushed into drained
treatment lagoons or left in
piles and covered with dirt.
Contaminated ground water
has migrated from the facility,
affecting nearby residential
wells The site contains 26,000
cubic yards of contaminants,
including VOCs, PCBs, and
wastes with flashpoints as low
as 25°C
Decision:
•	Install interim home carbon
treatment units in affected
homes.
•	Excavate and incinerate waste
and contaminated soil; remove
non-incinerables to offsite
RCRA sites.
•	Continue to investigate bed-
rock contamination and con-
taminated ground water plume
control
Contacts
•	Region- Paul Bitter,
Dave Favero
FTS 886-4742
•	Headquarters. Kitty Taimi
FTS 382-2449
Ed Barth
FTS 382-7998

-------
CHARLEVOIX
MUNICIPAL WELL,
REGION V,
MICHIGAN
(Approved 9/30/85)
Description.
•	The City's municipal well and
shallow ground water aquifer
are contaminated with TCE
and PCE. In June 1984, an IRM
for an alternate water supply
to replace the contaminated
municipal well was approved
There is no current, iden-
tifiable source of contamina-
tion; it was caused by either a
single spill or a source that
was subsequently removed
Decision
•	Contaminant plumes will at-
tenuate into Lake Michigan
under natural conditions.
•	Continue monitoring plumes.
•	Restrict new private wells in
aquifer.
Issues-
•	Plume attenuation selected
over active restoration of
aquifer.
•	State of Michigan currently
does not concur with remedy
Contacts.
•	Region: Jack Kratzmeyer
FTS 353-6449
•	Headquarters: Carol Lindsay
FTS 475-6704
NORTHERN AIRE,
REGION V,
MICHIGAN
(Approved 9/11/85)
Description
• Surface soils onsite have been
contaminated with chromium
and cadmium Sewer lines car-
rying waste water from an
electroplating plant leaked at
joints and contaminated a dry
well Contaminated water
entered highly permeable
soils The extent of ground
water contamination is not yet
known
Decision
•	Excavate soils, sewer line
sediments, and drywell under-
lying facility; dispose offsite
Fill with uncontaminated soil.
•	Response objectives are 50
mg/kg chromium, 10 mg/kg
cadmium.
•	Defer decision on ground
water treatment for future
ROD
Contacts.
•	Region Mary Elaine
Gustafson
FTS 886-6144
•	Headquarters. Kitty Taimi
FTS 382-2449
DEL NORTE PESTICIDE
STORAGE,
REGION IX,
CALIFORNIA
(Approved 9/30/85)
Description:
•	The site was a county storage
yard for empty containers of
herbicides, pesticides, and
some industrial wastes. In-
vestigation showed that not
all drums had been rinsed, nor
were all empty Some were
corroded and broken. A sump
pond onsite had high concen-
trations of chemicals. Ground
water contamination has oc-
curred. Chromium, assumed
to be unrelated to the site, was
also found in the ground
water.
Decision:
•	Excavate to background for
organic pesticides, remove
and dispose of approximately
700 cubic yards of con-
taminated soils offsite.
•	Extract contaminated ground
water Pretreat ground water
using carbon adsorption for
organic pesticides, using
coagulation and sand filtration
for chromium to levels accep-
table for discharge to the
POTW
•	Dispose of treated ground
water into county sewpr
system.
•	Monitor ground water.
Contacts:
•	Region Michelle Dermer
FTS 454-8144
•	Headquarters: Steve Hooper
FTS 475-6689
PONDERS CORNER,
REGION X,
WASHINGTON
(Approved 9/30/85)
Description:
•	A cleaning business deposited
dry-cleaning liquids and
solvents into septic systems
and onto the ground outside
the building. Two municipal
wells, which supply about 10
percent of the local water
district's drinking water needs
and fire protection, have been
contaminated. Interim
measures included pumping
septic tanks and disposal of
pumped material and installa-
tion of air-stripping on affected
wells.
Decision:
•	Pumping the municipal wells
has reduced plume concentra-
tions; therefore continue
operations of wells and ex-
isting treatment system with
minor upgrading and monitor.
•	The target cleanup level for the
aquifer is 10"6, but the final
decision has been deferred.
•	Excavate and remove septic
tanks and associated pipes
from behind the cleaning
business; dispose of offsite;
fill excavated area.
•	Restrict future uncontrolled
excavation to prevent direct
contact with low levels of TCE
remaining in soil column.
Contacts
•	Region Carol Thompson
FTS 399-2709
•	Headquarters: Steve Hooper
FTS 475-6689

-------
ENFORCEMENT
DECISION
DOCUMENT
CHEM-DYNE,
REGION V,
HAMILTON, OHIO
(Approved 7/5/85)
Description:
• Chem-Dyne accepted in-
dustrial wastes of virtually all
types. Wastes were stored on
the site in drums, bulk tanks,
and railroad cars. More than
30,000 drums and 300,000
gallons of bulk materials were
found onsite when the opera-
tions were shut down. Wastes
leaked into trenches, onto the
ground, and into sewers. All
waste materials, drums, tanks,
and other bulk storage
facilities were removed and
disposed of offsite by EPA in
late 1983. Soils and onsite
structures were heavily con-
taminated with a wide variety
of hazardous substances.
Ground water is contaminated
by a plume consisting primari-
ly of volatile organics This
plume threatens nearby in-
dustrial wells and the City of
Hamilton's drinking water sup-
ply four miles downgradient
Decision:
• Extraction, treatment, and re-
injection of contaminated
ground water Operate system
for a minimum of 10 years
Concentrations of hazardous
substances in monitoring
wells immediately outside the
contaminant plume must not
exceed background levels or
human health criteria (at 10~6
risk). Ground water pumping
must continue until concentra-
tions of total VOCs are below
01 ppm in each monitor well
within the plume and — more
importantly — until concentra-
tions become "effectively con-
stant" in each well within the
plume Further, a demonstra-
tion must be made before ter-
mination, both by sampling
and by the use of a ground
water contaminant transport
model, that remaining concen-
trations of contaminants
within the plume will not
migrate from the site at con-
centrations in excess of esta-
blished human health criteria
•	Excavation of "hot spots" of
contaminated soils.
•	RCRA Part 264 cap over the re-
maining contaminated soils
•	Demolition of all buildings on-
site, uncontaminated building
rubble left onsite beneath cap.
•	Extensive monitoring pro-
grams.
Issues:
•	Deferment of the ACL deter-
mination (i.e., establishing
final ground water protection
standards) until after remedial
technology achieves effective-
ly constant concentrations of
contaminants
Contacts:
•	Region: Tom Barriball
FTS 886-7239
•	Headquarters: Kate Sellers
FTS 382-7790
A Line on RODsmbm
ROD WORKSHOP
Last spring's highly successful
ROD training course will make
its return on February 25 and 26
at the Ramada Hotel in Old
Town Alexandria, Virginia This
course is designed to promote
national consistency in ROD
decision-making by informing
Regional technical and legal
staffs of the latest ROD pro-
cedures and policy develop-
ments and by providing a forum
for sharing specific site ex-
periences
Topics on the agenda for this
session include the latest news
on CERCLA reauthorization, a
review of the recent NCP revi-
sions, and a discussion of some
mechanics of the ROD process
such as review on the record,
the role of EDDs and NDDs vs.
RODs, how to amend a ROD,
new proposed delegation
criteria and procedures, the
state role in the ROD process,
and the ROD information net-
work Policy issues to be
discussed will include the
RCRA/CERCLA interface, selec-
ting alternative technologies,
ground water risk management,
the offsite policy, and PCBs,
among others
A number of rooms are being
held for Regional participants at
the Ramada To reserve a room,
please call the hotel directly at
(703) 683-6000. To register for the
course, please call Mary Gade in
Region V at FTS 886-6851
Funding and travel restrictions
may prevent repetition of the
course in Dallas later this spring
as originally planned. Therefore,
an attempt will be made to
videotape the Washington ses-
sion for distribution.
HOW TO ORDER REMEDIAL
ACTION HANDBOOK
The revised edition of the
ORD/OSWER Handbook on Re-
medial Action at Waste Disposal
Sites (described in the last ROD
Update) may be ordered by call-
ing FTS 684-7562 or (513)
569-7562 The document number
is 625/685/006.

-------