EPA-460/3-74-015
OCTOBER 1974
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PKOTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM 1967-1974 LIGHT-DUTY
VEHICLES IN DENVER, HOUSTON,
AND DETROIT
-------
EPA-460/3-74-.
A STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM 1967-1974 LIGHT-DUTY
VEHICLES IN DENVER, HOUSTON,
AND DETROIT
Prepared by
D R. Liljedahl and J L Terry
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc
19900 E. Colfax Ave.
Aurora, Colorado 80011
Contract No 68-03-0388
EPA Project Officer: John T White III
Prepared for
U S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Certification and Surveillance Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
October 1974
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - as supplies permit - from the Air
Pollution Technical Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the
National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
Virginia 22151.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc , Aurora, Colorado, in fulfillment of
Contract No. 68-03-0388. The contents of this report are reproduced herein
as received from Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc. The opinions,
findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily
those of the Environmental Protection Agency Mention of company or product
names is not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-74-015
li
-------
ABSTRACT
A laboratory emissions study was conducted on a sample of 1067-1974
model-year vehicles operating in Denver, Houston and Detroit. Emissions
from five-hundred and forty vehicles, one hundred and eighty from each
city, were investigated. Sound level tests were also performed on eighty-
five vehicles from the San Antonio area.
Exhaust emission tests were performed on each vehicle in the as-received
condition using the 1975 Federal Test Procedure, Evaporative emission tests
were performed on twenty 1973 model-year vehicles in the Denver area using
the canister collection procedure of the Federal Register and the SHED
testing techniques of SAE .T 171. \ varietv of additional exhaust emission
tests were also performed. Modal emissions data were developed from
seventy-five of the 1^72, 1973 and 1974 model-year vehicles in each site
using Surveillance Driving Sequence and steady state testing procedures.
Emissions from air conditioned vehicles were investigated in Houston and
Detroit using a sequence of four modified FTP hot start tests. Emissions
from loaded vehicles and vehicles towing trailers were also investigated
using Surveillance Driving Sequence and steady state testing procedures.
Sound level tests were performed at the vide onen throttle test condition
in accordance with the SAE J986a procedure and at the five operating
conditions of the EPA Use Cycle Modes. Additional tests were conducted for
use in sound level contour development.
ili
-------
ACiCKv.T.KnnnvriTs
The support of the Surveillance Branch of the Fnvironmenlal Protec-
tion Agency, Division of Certification and Surveillance is acknowledged with
a special thanks to Mr. John T. White IIT, L!PA "rolect Officer and staff
for their professional guidance and helpful assistance.
The assistance of Dollar-A-Day Rental Car Systems is acknowledged for
its service in providing courtesy vehicles in Denver, Houston, Detroit
and San Antonio with a special thanks to June Sanuels and staff of the
Denver office for their prompt and courteous service.
The mailing firm of Hihbert/Laman of Denver is acknowledged for the
design and preparation of mailing materials in accordance with the stringent
operating schedules. A sincere thank vou is extended to Mr. Jim Kramer.
A special thanks is extended to Mr. I.ee Cunningham for directing the
sound level testing effort in the San Antonio area.
iv
-------
Table of Contents
Page No.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 3
2.1 Program Objectives 3
2.2 Program Design 3
2.3 Test Vehicle Procurement 6
2.3.1 Test vehicle Selection 7
2.3.2 Incentives 12
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling 12
2.4 facilities and Equipment 13
2.4.1 Test Location*? 13
2.A.2 Constant Volume Samplers 14
2.4.3 Emission-Analysis Consoles 14
2.4.4 Evaporative Emissions Equipment 15
2.4.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Oases 17
2.4.6 Chassis Dynamometers 17
2.4.7 Equipment for Special Additional Tasks 18
2.4.7.1 Special Equipment for Modal Emissions 18
2.4.7.2 Special Equipment for Simulation of
Loaded Vehicles and Vehicles Towing
Trailers 19
2.4.7.3 Special Equipment for Sound Level Testing 20
2.4.8 Miscellaneous Equipment 20
2.5 Equipment Qualification, Calibration and Cross-Check 21
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler 21
2.5.2 Emissions Analyzers Console 22
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer 22
2.5.4 Evaporative Emissions Equipment 23
2.5.5 Equipment for Special Additional Tasks 23
2.6 Test Procedures 24
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation 27
2.0.1.1 Preparation of Vehicles Not Subjected
to Evaporation Emissions Testing 27
2.6.1.2 Preparation of Vehicles Subjected to
Evaporative Emissions Testing 28
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation 29
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure 20
2.6.4 Modal Exhaust Emission Test Procedures 30
2.6.5 Evaporative Emission Test Procedure 31
2.6.5.1 SHED Procedure 31
2.6.5.2 Canister Procedure 32
2.6.6 Special Additional Tests 32
2.6.6.1 Test Procedures for Loaded Vehicles and
Vehicles Towing Trailers 32
2.6.6.2 Test Procedures for Air Conditioned
Vehicle Emission Factors Development 35
2.6.6.3 Test Procedures for Fuel Economy 36
2.6.6.4 Test Procedures for Sound Level 36
2.6.6.5 After Test Procedures 39
v
-------
2.6.7 Daily Test Schedule 41
2.7 Data Handling 41
2.7.1 Data Collection 41
2.7.2 Data Processing 42
2.7.3 Calculation of Results 42
2.7.3.1 Exhaust Emissions (Federal Test Procedure) 42
2.7.3.2 Modal Emissions 43
2.7.3.3 Fuel Economy 43
2.7.3.4 Evaporative Emissions 43
2.7.3.5 Air Conditioned Vehicle Emissions 43
2.7.3.6 Emissions from Loaded Vehicles and
Vehicles Towing Trailers 44
2.7.3.7 Sound Level Tests 44
3. TEST RESULTS 45
3.1 Discussion of Exhaust Emission and Fuel Economy Test
Results 45
3.1.1 Federal Test Procedure and Higbwav Fuel
Economy Test Exhaust Emissions and ^uel Economy 45
3.1.1.1 Vehicles Meeting Federal Emissions
Standards 50
3.1.1.2 1972 Vehicles Meeting 1972 federal
Standards 57
3.1.1.3 1^73 Vehicle Meeting 1073 Federal
Standards 61
3.1.1.4 1974 Vehicles Meeting 1974 Federal
Standards 65
3.1.2 Modal Emissions 69
3.2 Discussion of Evaporative Emission Test Results 79
3.3 Discussion of Federal Test Procedure Replicate Testing 81
3.4 Discussion of Federal Air Conditioned Vehicle Emission
Test Results 83
3.5 Discussion of Emissions from Loaded Vehicles Towing
Trailers 85
3.6 Discussion of Sound Level Test Results 94
4. APPENDICES 97
Appendices page no.
Appendix A Listing of Vehicle and Test Parameters 98
in Denver 99
in Houston 102
in Detroit 105
Appendix R Listing of Test Vehicle Use and Maintenance Data 108
in Denver 109
in Houston 112
in Detroit 115
Appendix C Listing of Federal Test Procedure Results on
Individual Vehicles 118
in Denver 120
in Houston 170
in Detroit 215
vi
-------
Appendix D Listing of Modal Results on Individual Vehicles 260
in Denver 262
in Houston 287
in Detroit 312
Appendix E Listing of Evaporative Fmission Test Results
on Individual Vehicles in Denver 337
Appendix F Listing of Individual Test Results on Air-Condi-
tioned Vehicles 339
in Houston 340
in Detroit 350
Appendix G Listing of Loaded Vehicle Test Results on
Individual Vehicles in Detroit 360
Appendix H Listing of Individual Sound Level Tests 405
Appendix I Data Sheets from Idle Contour Sound Level
Measurements 408
Appendix J Test ^uel Inspection Reports 429
vii
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
M.
8
9
47
51
58
62
66
70
73
76
80
82
84
86
95
List of Tables
Title
Summary of Vehicle Makes
Summary of Test Vehicle Characteristics by
Model Year
Exhaust Emission Test Results vs. Model Year
Vehicles Meeting Federal Standards
1972 Vehicles Meetinp 1972 Federal Standards
1973 Vehicles Meeting 1973 Federal Standards
1174 Vehicles Meetinp 1974 Federal Standards
Sunmary of Modal Emission Results on Thirty 1°72
Model-Year Vehicles
Summary of Modal Emissions on Thirty-Five 1973 Model-
Year Vehicles
Summary of Modal Emissions on Ten 1974 Model-Year
Vehicles
Summary of Evaporative Emission Test Results on
Twenty 1973 Model-Year Vehicles
Summary of Results of Replicate Testing on Twenty
1973 Model-Year Vehicles
Summary of Air Conditioned Vehicle Tests vs. Model
Year
Summary of Loaded Vehicle Tests on Six 1967 Model-
Year Vehicles
Summary of Sound Level Tests by Model Year
viii
-------
I. ITTRODUCTIOK
The United States Environmental Protection Agencv (EPA), through
authority provided by the Clean Air Act is responsible for the prevention
and control of air pollution. One of the responsibilities of the EPA as
provided by the act is the design, conduct and promotion of surveys and
studies of the sources and causes of air pollution. The Sur*iillance
liranch of the EPA, Certification and Surveillance Division has the
responsibility of obtaining emission data on in-use motor vehicles.
These data are utilized within EPA by the National Air Data branch and
the office of Transportation Land Use Planning for their use in calculating
and prcfectin^ nationwide and metropolitan area motor vehicle emissions
for light-dutv vehicle"?. The emission factors generated are also used
in developing transportation control procedures and emergencv episode
considerations. Outside EPA, these factors are used by various state
and local agencies in their air pollution control nlans.
The FY 71 Program, EPA's first ma^or surveillance program using the
constant volume sampler (CVS) techniques, measured exhaust and evaporative
emissions fron 1957-1971 light-duty vehicles. Similar work on 1066-1972
model-year vehicles was completed in the FY 72 light-dutv vehicle study
program. The FY 73 program, the subject of this report, was initiated to
study emissions from 1167-1974 light duty vehicles.
tn carrying out its FY 73 program, the contracted uith Automotive
Testing Laboratories, Inc., (ATL) to provide emission data from vehicles
operating in three U.S. metropolitan areas. The three citier. studv was
part of a larger studv effort to develop data from vehicles operating in
-------
Houston and Detroit. Sound level data, collected on a sample of lisht-
duty vehicles in support of the EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and
Control are also presented. These tests were performed in the San Antonio
area.
2
-------
2. TrCUMICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 rnonnAM niurrTTV".
The primarv objective of the propram is to nrovide li<»ht-dutv vehicle
emission data to be used to establish and nredict vehicle emissions on a
nationwide and metropolitan area basis. These data are to be utilized to
calculate average emission factors from which emission source inventories
and emergency episode pollution abatement procedures mav be developed.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGi:
The Environmental Protection Agency specified standard mass emission
tests be performed on a sampling of 1%7 through 1974 model-year vehicles
operating in six metropolitan areas; Denver, Houston, Detroit, Los Angeles,
Jeuark and St. Louis. The H'A also specified evanorative emission tests
be performed on certain 1973 model-year vehicles in the Denver and
Los Angeles samples.
nther tests designed to satisfy certain studv objectives were scheduled
for other sites. Air conditioned vehicle emission data for factors develop-
ment were generated usinp Houston and Detroit area vehicles. Emission and
fuel economy data were developed from Denver and Detroit area vehicles
usinp the ETA recently developed Hi^hvav Fuel Economv TeSu. Modal mass
emissions data for factors development wore generated from vehicles operating
in all sites. The same modal nrocedures were utilized for modal mass emis-
sion factors development for loaded vehicles and vehicles towing trailers
usinp, a sample of Detroit area vehicles.
Sound level data were also developed from an eighty-five (85) vehicle
sample of the 1967-1974 model-year vintage.
In view of program objectives, the EPA specified the sample cC 180
vehicles to be tested at each site with certain allowances for substitute
3
-------
vehicles. Certain limitations on testing site locations and vehicle
procurement sources were also stipulated. With regards to the ATL effort
(Denver, Houston and Detroit), a standard sampling and procurement strategy
was utilized and incentives to test participants were offered and provided
at CPA's direction.
The HPA also stipulated the types of tests to he performed. Exhaust
emission tests hy the 1075 test procedure were specified for all vehicles.
Evaporative emission tests hy the Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determina-
tion (SHED) technique and hy the canister method as nrescrihed in the
federal Register for certification testing were specified. Guidelines
on the composition of the evaporative emission test sample were provided.
Further direction was provided hy the ITA with regards to the additional
testing tasks assigned to ATL. Modal emissions measurements were required
from the seventy-five (75) 1972, 1973 and 1974 model-year vehicles tested
at each site. To achieve the objectives of the task, continuous dilute
constant volume sampler emissions were measured and recorded during vehicle
acceleration and deceleration over the 1,054 second Surveillance driving
Sequence and at seven (7) steady state vehicle operating modes.
The air conditioned vehicle emission factors data were developed from
twenty (20) vehicles each in Houston and Detroit. These data were developed
through vehicle operation hv the federal Register procedures except that
the vehicle was operated over the driving schedule from a hot start.
The testing sequence, comprised of four hot start tests, was conducted
solely on vehicles equipped with factorv installed air conditioning
systems. Testing was such as to allow calculation of emission factors for
vehicles with the air conditioning system operating.
4
-------
The LVA specified the Surveillance Driving Sequence vehicle operation
and modal mass sampling techniques be utilized to develop data on loaded
vehicles and vehicles towing trailers. Tests were performed on 42 Detroit
area vehicles at three load conditions. The first was at the inertia
weight and road load settings of the Federal Register. The second was
at a higher inertia weight to simulate the addition of passengers and
baggage. The third was at an even higher inertia weight and a higher road
load setting to simulate the addition of a towed vehicle. A nrerequisite
to this phase of the study was the determination of suitable road load
horsepower settings. This was accomnlished bv utilizing the nrocodures
of the federal Register for determining actual road load power settings.
Specific procedures and results are ^resented in paragraph ''.fi.'i.] of this
report.
The development of fuel economy data was one of the studv requirements.
Fuel economy data were developed in conjunction with the standard emission
tests. The EPA also required additional fuel economy data he provided from
all Denver and Detroit area vehicles. 'i".e testing procedure utilized to
develop these data was the ITA's recently developed llighwav Fuel Economy Test.
In all cases, the carbon balance technique was used in the calculation of
fuel economy.
With final regards to testing procedures, the IT" A specified sound level
tests be performed on eighty-five (85) ln67-1°74 model-year vehicles.
The SAK Standard J 98f>a "Sound I-evel for "assenger Cars ami Light Trucks"
was specified. In addition, all vehicles were tested at constant speed
drive-by conditions, at idle and at one acceleration rate from t standing
start. Ten (10) vehicles were further tested at two engine idling conditions
to develop sound level contour data.
-------
Other design considerations were comprised of specified equipment and
calibration requirements, test fuel requirements, and data treatment and
reporting requirements.
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
The EPA specified tests be performed on a sample of 1067-1974 model-
year vehicles at each site. The procurement of vehicles for the required
sample was based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by ape of vehicle as
reported by the National Academy of Science. Within each model-year the
sample was based on sales information. The sample was further delineated by
make, engine size (displacement), transmission type and carburetion type
including a sampling of fuel injected engines. In addition, certain
Houston and Detroit area vehicles were required to be equipped with
air-conditioning systems for the air conditioned vehicle emission
fac ors segment of the study.
The EPA also stinulated candidate vehicles be procured from the
subject metropolitan areas. Tor study nur.ioacs, a metropolitan area was
defined as being not more than 1^ miles outside the boundaries of the
city specified. Other stipulations included the following minimum require-
ments :
1007 fit to the make and model-year specified
90% fit to the make, model-year and engine displacement specified.
757. fit to the make, model-year, engine displacement, transmission
type and carburetor type specified.
In addition, for any one model-year, the use of rental vehicles was
limited to ten percent of the vehicles tested at each location. The
number of vehicles procured from members of civic, fraternal or reli-
gious organizations was also limited to 50" of vehicles tested at each
site and groups of test vehicles from automotivelv oriented organizations
6
-------
were prohibited. In these respects, deviations from sample specifications
were either equal to or less than the naximum allowed. A delineation
of test sample composition by model-year and make as applied to each site
is shown in Table 1. A further delineation of tost sample composition
by model-year versus vehicle inertia weights, engine displacement and
number of engine cylinders is shown for each site in Table .
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection
The test sample was procured in accordance with a reenrnized stand-
ard .recurement strategy. A list of vehicle o^mers was developed for
each site. Owners were selected from computer files by an n^1 n.w
selection orocess. Introductory materials, including a letter from ETA
and a letter from ATL, were mailed to prospective participants coinci-
dent to nrelininary equipment set-up and calibration activities. Mailed
materials also contained a post-paid data reply card on which certain
vehicle identification data (engine size, transmisnion, carburetor,
vehicle I.D. no., etc.) were requested. This information was subsequently
utilized to select and schedule test vehicles in accordance with require-
ments of the EPA listed test sample.
The mailing process was directed toward about 5,000 registered
vehicles in each of the three test sites. Affirmative replies, which were
on the order of ten percent of initial mailings, produced about eighty-five
to ninetv percent of the desired samnlp. The remainder of the samnle was
procured as a result of several strategies. These included a direct request
for specific vehicles via the news media, automobile repair or<»ani7.'*_ion
service files and used car lots.
2.3.2 Incentives
To improve the level of participation by vehicle otmers, incentives
were offered. These incentives, consisting of a $25.00 U.S. Savings Hond
7
-------
Table 1
Summary of Vehicle Makes by Model-Year
Each Site
1967 1968 1969 1070 1971 1972 1973 1074 Total
AMC
lluicl;
Cadillac
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
Capri
0
0
0
0
0
n
]
0
Chevrolet
4
5
fi
fi
6
7
8
o
Chrysler
1
0
1
0
1
n
]
0
Datsun
0
0
0
n
1
l
1
0
Dodge
1
1
1
l
1
•>
o
I
^ord
3
A
5
r
>
5
fi
7
o
Lincoln
0
0
T
0
n
l
n
0
Mazda
0
0
0
0
0
n
1
0
Mercury
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
n
Oldsmobile
1
1
1
o
2
1
Opel
0
0
0
0
0
l
0
0
Tlymouth
1
1
1
2
2
o
2
l
I'ontiac
1
1
2
2
2
n
/.
0
1
Toyota
0
0
0
1
1
l
1
0
Volkswagen
1
1
1
1
1
2
T
1
Totals
i:
IS
?1
12
27
30
35
10
5
11
1
1
1
in
180
8
-------
0
10
6
7
5
21
39
48
32
11
1
4 u
41
b4
41
24
19
36
1
TABLE 2
SUM 1ARY OF TEST VEHICLE CHARACTER IS TICS
BY MODEL YEAR
DENVER
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
INERTIA WEIGHTS (LBS)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
3
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
3
4
3
1
1
4
4
1
5
6
6
3
7
5
4
3
6
4
6
9
o
3
12
2
1
2
5
4
6
8
4
2
1
1
.0
2
1
3
2
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
4
4
3
4
7
9
12
1
7
7
6
4
b
4
5
3
4
4
9
9
7
9
9
3
2
3
3
5
8
8
9
3
NUMBER OF CYLINDERS
1
3
13
0
I
3
14
0
1
2
18
0
2
2
18
0
5
2
20
0
7
2
21
0
6
5
23
1
1
0
g
0
17 18 21 2.J. 27 30 35 l'J
9
-------
fABLE 2
SUMMARY OF TEST VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS
BY MODEL YEAR
HOUSTON
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 TOTALS
INERTIA WEIGHTS (LBS)
1750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20 UO
1
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
5
2/50
0
0
1
0
2
3
1
1
8
2500
0
0
0
1
1
5
0
1 L
2750
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
5
300 0
3
2
5
1
1
2
6
0
20
3500
4
6
4
4
8
4
3
2
35
U00 9
6
3
4
8
6
6
a
3
4500
2
5
5
6
4
7
6
4
39
5000
1
1
2
0
2
3
3
0
12
5^00
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
UNDER 251
4
4
3
4
7
9
11
1
43
251 - 330
7
6
6
4
5
4
6
3
41
331 - 399
3
5
10
9
7
9
9
4
56
OVER 399
3
3
2
5
8
8
9
2
40
NUMBER
OF
CYLINDERS
4
1
1
1
2
5
8
8
1
27
6
3
3
2
2
2
1
3
0
16
8
13
14
18
18
20
21
23
9
136
ROTARY
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
TOTALS
17
18
2]
2 J
27
30
35
10
180
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF TEST VEHICLE CHARACTERISTICS
RY MODEL YEAR
DETROIT
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
TOTAL'
INERTIA
WEIGHTS (LBS)
1750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
n
7
2? 50
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
l
6
2500
0
0
0
1
1
4
3
0
9
2750
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
0
6
30m'.
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
0
14
3500
2
8
7
5
7
3
6
1
39
1000
11
4
7
9
5
4
7
4
51
4500
0
2
4
2
6
11
6
3
34
50 00
1
1
0
2
2
1
4
1
12
5500
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
ENGINE DISPLACEMENT (CUBIC INCHES)
UNDER
251
4
4
3
4
7
9
11
1
43
251 ~
3 ^0
6
8
5
4
5
4
5
3
40
331 -
399
5
3
11
9
7
9
10
3
57
OVER
399
2
3
2
5
8
8
9
3
40
NUMBER
OF
CYLINDERS
4
1
1
1
2
5
7
6
1
24
6
3
3
2
2
2
2
5
0
19
8
13
14
18
18
20
21
23
9
136
ROTARY
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
TOTALS 17 18 21 2-> 27 30 35 10 180
11
-------
(actual value, $18.7r>), the use of late model loan car during the time the
test car w.m at the laboratory and fuel for the loan car, were outlined and
offered in the introductory material. In general, the incentives as
described were ultimately provided to each participant. In a few cases,
however, the mmer requested an equivalent amount of cash in lieu of the
savings bond. In other cases, incentives in amounts up to $5'"1.r|0 were pro-
vided. Situations where cash incentives were provided, however, were limited
to a few isolated circumstances involvinp, vehicle., which were othend.se
difficult to locate.
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling
A file containing the owner cards was established and utilized to schedule
vehicles for testing. Owners were contacted by telephone at the number
listed on the reply card. At thin time, information submitted on the data
card was confirmed and incomplete information was obtained. Vehicles which
met with sample requirements, or apnroved substitute vehicles, were then
scheduled for testing.
Upon delivery at the test site, each vehicle was initially inspected
to confirm compliance with sample requirements. In a few cases, vehicles
were rejected at this point because of improper engine or carburetor
identification by the owners. This occured one or two times in each site.
In othe ¦ situtatims, vehicles were rejected for exhaust system leakage or
safety reasons. In each of Denver and Houston, less than three vehicles
were in this category while six Detroit area vehicles were reacted because
of leaks in the exhaust system. After preliminary inspections indicate.,
a vehicle to be acceptable, loan vehicle agreement forms were completed,
an LPA designed questionnaire on vehicle use and maintenance was administered
and a tentative test vehicle pick-up time was established. The vehicle
was then moved to a wor'' area where pre-test operations were to bo performed.
12
-------
2.4 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
2.4.1 Test Locations
Automotive Testinp Laboratories, Inc. operates a permanent facilitv
in the Denver metropolitan area. Laboratory work for the Denver area was
performed in this facility. Two additional facilities, established on a
temporary basis, were installed to perform testing in the Houston and
Detroit areas. The location of each facility and the elevation above sea-
level are as listed below:
Denver 19900 East Colfax Avenue
Aurora, Colorado 80011
5490 feet
Houston 1100 Bingle Road, Suite 135
Houston, Texas 77055
60 feet
Detroit 1307 Allen Drive, Suite A.
Troy, Michigan 48084
600 feet
The Denver facility, situated about six miles from the eastern boundary
of the Denver city limits, contains about 10,000 snuare feet of laboratory,
shop and office area. The Houston facility, situated in the northwest part
of Houston, contained about 7,?00 square feet of office and laboratory
area. The Detroit facility was situated about 7 mJles north of the Detroit
city limits and also contained about 7,200 squire feet of office and
laboratory area.
2.4.2 Constant Volume Samplers
For the most oart, one constant volume sampler (CVS) was utilized
in the course of the study. Another CVS was used in the Denver phase of
the study, primarily to perform basic and modal exhaust emission tests
associated with the twenty vehicles also subjected to evaporative emission
testing.
13
-------
The CVS units were designed and constructed by Automotive Environ-
mental Systems, Inc. (AESI) of Westminister, California. The units are
of similar design with nominal flow rates of 325 cubic feet of air per
minute flow capacity. Each unit incorporates a pas to water heat exchanger
and otherwise conforms to the requirements of 37 Federal Register 221
(section 85.073-20).
2.A.3 Umission-.Analysls Consoles
Apain, a single emission analysis console was used for the major por-
tion of the program. A second console was used in conjunction with the
performance of exhaust/evaporative emission testing of twenty vehicles in
Denver, 'flic consoles are similar in operation and contain the
following major components:
iScckman Model 315 A NDIR CO analyzers with stacked sample cell
arrangement, six ranpe capabilities and CO., and water vanrtr
interference filters.
Beckman Model 315 A and 315 1$ C00 analyzers with three ranp.e
capabilities.
ueckraan Model 400 Hydrocarbon ^lame Ionization Detector *rith four
ranpe capabilities.
Thermo-Electron Model 10A Cheniluminescent NO and IIOx anal\zer
equipped with a therm..1 converter and seven ran**e capabilities.
Texas Instruments 10 inch dual or triple channel notentionetric strio
chart recorders.
Analytical consoles were designed and constructed bv AT in accordance
with the federal Register as annlied to the irrsent exhaust emission test-
ing procedures. Modifications to the sample flow sister1 for renovir"
COt and water vapor from the CO sample stream were not nrovided, howovter,
in view of the relatively hir.h emission levels expected to le encountered.
These .nodifications will be nocossnrv when testing vehicles designed to
meet 1975 federal Standards.
U
-------
2.4.A Evaporative Emissions Equipment
Evaporative hydrocarbon losses were measured by both the Sealed Housing
for Evaporative Determination (S11KD) technique of SAF, J171 and by the
charcoal trap procedure as outlined in the Federal Register. Equipment
common to both techniques include an electrical heating blanket for apply-
ing heat to the vehicle fuel tank and subsequently to tank fuel, a
powers tat to regulate blanket heat output, a multi-point temperature recorder
and a fuel conditioning cart. The 20 by 30 inch heating blanket,
rated at 1500 watts, attaches to the fuel tank by means of flexible
sfaps affixed to each corner of the blanket. The powers tat provides
variable voltage for control of blanket heat output. The temperature record-
er, a Texas Instrument Multi-Riter, is capable of discontinuous recording
from as many as twenty-four sources in a variety of input and tiring selection
options. For study purnoses, iron-constantan thermocouples were utilized
to record soak area, SUED interior and vehicle tank fuel temperatures at
a 2.0 second per point print rate. The effective chart paper width of ten
inches was utilized to provide a temperature recording range from 0 to 400
degrees Fahrenheit. In this configuration, temperature changes of one
degree Fahrenheit are easily resolved. The fuel conditioning cart, of
ATL design and construction, is equipped with a waste fuel tank and an
insulated fuel tank. A gear-type pump and valving are provided for multi-
directional transfer of fuel. The cart is also enuinped with a fuel heating
and cooling circuit. Cooling capacity is sufficient to maintain twenty or
less gallons of gasoline at temperatures below 50 degrees Fahrenheit under
normal laboratory ambient temperature conditions. ruel temperatures are
maintained by means of a Honevwell temperature sensor and controller.
15
-------
A vehicle enclosure anil a hydrocarbon an.ilvzor wore utilimd to
perform r.l'FD tests tn conlunction with .he enuipment listed above. The
enclosure is constructed of aluminum floor, side, rear and top panels.
"all and ceiling openings, provided to permit the entrance of lif^ht and
unobstructed views of the enclosure interior, are covered with Dupont
Tcdlar. .linked doors are constructed of square aluminum tubing and
'i'edlar. Door latches are provided which maintain the enclosure at a
relatively air tiftht condition. An internal blower of nominal 100 cubic
feet of air per minute flow capacity is provided to mix the atmosphere
of the chamber. Sealed thermocouple connectors and a sample port are
also provided. A "ieckman Model 400 Hydrocarbon ^lame Ionization Detector
was used to monitor enclosure hydrocarbon "levels during evaporative
emission test runs.
Evaporative hydrocarbon emission tests by the procedures of the fed-
eral Register were performed usinp, charcoal traps and an assortment of
hardware used in conlunction with trap hook-un. A variety of exhaust
pipe and carburetor air horn plup,s were also utilized. Charcoal traps
are of nominal 150 prams charcoal capacity.
2.4.5 Laboratory Standard Calibration Cases
Laboratory standard p,as blends were used to establish and maintain
analytical instrument calibrations. Froiect standard n;ases "ore shipped
to the EPA laboratory for identification prior to utilization. rases
are listed on the following pap.e:
ir,
-------
HC (ppm C)
106.4
515.7
1383
4800
109.1
594.7
1657
5784
246.3
938.2
2613
8645
248
979.2
2635
9241
1»T0V (ppm)
30.9
9o. 2
405.6
999
47.8
194.2
513.9
2350
93.°
203.6
970
2368
CO (mole 7>)
0.0522
0.2805
1.110
3.22
0.0090
0.2990
1.591
3.80
0.1500
0.676
2.109
4.67
0.2009
1.007
2.578
4.79
CO2 (mole ")
0.488
1.535
3.153
7.83
0.672
2.541
4.00
8.04
1.525
3.029
5.65
2.A.6 Chassis Dynamometers
Two Clayton Model CT-200 chassis dynamometers were utilized during
the T>rof»ram. Each was equipped vdth a 50 hp bridge and associated
power meter. Variable inertia flywheel assemblies were the bolt-driven
type with 1500 to 5500 lb inertia selection capabilities. One of the
dynamometers was used to perform the great ma-jorl ty of tests. The other
was used to perform tests associated with the twpntv evaporative emission
tests in Denver.
2.4.7 Equipment for Special Additional Tasks
As indicated, several additional tasks were performed beyond the
'jasic procedures of the Federal Register and the evaporative emission
testing procedures of SAr J171. These were comprised of emission
determinations at various operating modes, loaded vehicle emissions
and emissions from vehicles towing trailers, emissions from air conditioned
vehicles by the basic hot start CVS procedure, fuel economy tests by
17
-------
the Highway Fuel Lconoray Driving Schedule and sound level tests. Vehicle
tailpipe emission . .cnsurements and certain engine diagnostic neasurements
vere also performed, i.'ith the exception of the fuel economy and air condi-
tioned vehicle emission factors tasVs, each task required special additional
equipment.
2.4.7.1 .Special l>iuinment for Modal Emissions - Ordinarily, the vehicle's
0!?n braking system is utilized durinp emissions testing on the chasr.is dvna-
mometer. Tn the normal vehicle/dvnanometer test configuration, less than
one-half of the hrakinp capacity is provided bv the drive wheel brakes
of the test vehicle. As a result, the effective braking capacity under
normal test conditions (i.e., the hasic emission test of the federal
Register) is marginal. Additional braking requirements, presented bv SDS
operations, dictated more adequate braking he provided. In order to meet
these requirements, an alternate brake system was provided.
The alternate system was comprised of a foot pedal type actuator
and four pairs of pneumatically operated caliper-type brake pads. Tuo of
the pairs were firmly mounted in such a way as to enpape each of t..e two
heavier or outer flywheels of the dynamometer inertia assembly. To avoid
the possibility of altering the dynamometer nower absorption characteristics
a minimum tolerance of 0.125 inches twis maintained between the pads and the
flywheel when the calipers were in a relaxed position. During testing
operations the foot contact area of the pneumatic actuator assemhlv was
situated above or beside the vehicle brake -t-dal. 'vTien in \i3e, the alternate
system supplied all of the hrakinp force required and was more than adequate
to meet the vehicle deceleration rate demands of the SDS. As a matter of
practice, the alternate system was used exclusively with respect to the
SDS modal emissions tests at normal vehicle loading conditions and in
-------
conlunctlon with sns modal emissions tests for loaded vehicles and vehicles
towing trailers. The latter tests required more than the nornal amount
of inertia loading.
2.4.7.2 Special Equipment for Simulation of Loaded Vehicles and Vehicles
Tawing Trailers. - Design considerations relating to the loaded vehicle and
vehicles towing trailer task included the requirement to provide additional
inertia and road load, ^or the purpose of this study, vehicles were tested
at three load conditions. The first involved testing at the inertia and
road load settings of the Federal Register. The second involved testing
at the inertia setting of the federal Register nlus 500 Ih9. In this
case the road load setting was not increased from the setting of the fed-
eral Register to correspond to the additional inertia weight. The third
test was performed at the inertia setting of the Federal Register nlus
1,000 lbs. In the latter case, an empirically derived additional road load
setting was applied.
Since additional road load power requirements were within the load
capabilities of the dynamometer, no modifications to the dvnamometa. were
necessary. With respect to inertia loading, however, it was necessary to
provide additional loading capability. This was supplied by means of an
auxiliary belt-driven flywheel assembly of 1000 lbs inertia weight which,
when utilized, was coupled to the drive shaft of the Clayton flywheel
inertia unit. The auxiliary flywheel assembly was equipped with the caliper-
type pneumatically actuated brake system described in paragraph 2.4.7.1.
2.4.7.3 Special Equipment for Sou.k? Level Test - S\T7 Standard T9-%a
specifies the type and quality of instrumentation to be used in the conduct
of sound level tests, ^or the purpose of this element of the study, a Bruel
and Kjaer 'todel 2200 Precision Sound Level Meter was utilized. Instrument
10
-------
features include a precision microphone, A, B, C, P and Linear weighted
sound level scales, sound level peal: or RMS selection options, fast or
slow response characteristics and continuous following or hold recording
capabilities. In addition, the sound level lit supplied with the instrument
included a Pistonphonc type 4220 Calibrator, a tripod, 50 foet of micro-
phone extension cable and a microphone windscreen.
The site utilized for sourd level tests was a dra<*-strip facility
situated to the south of San Antonio, Tp::cis. The surface of the 60
by A,000 foot road way is asphalt paved.
2.4.8 Miscellaneous Equipment
In addition to the emission equipment described, Varian Model 0 10.0
strip chart recorders with pre-printed chart paper were utilized to assist the
vehicle operator to drive the prescribed driving schedules. Lnrine coolinr*
was provided by 4300 cubic feet of air per minute fan^. Dynamometer
entrance and exit ramps were utilised at temporary sites to facilitate on-
off vehicle flow and vehicle leveling. A ratchetin^-tvpp cable winch
was employed to restrain the test vehicle during testin" operations in
addition to restraint provided by wheel chocl s.
Engine diagnostics were performed usint^ ^araf»e-type diagnostic
equipment to measure tailpipe hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions.
Sun Electric Company Model EPA-75 emissions analyzers were utilized.
Additional Sun Electric Company tachometers, dwellmeters and timing lights
were utilized to record engine speed (rpm), ignition timing and ignition
dwell.
Additional instrumentation was utilized for laboratory equipment
calibration and qualification procedures. These are described below.
20
-------
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION AND CROSS-CHFCK
To ensure the validity of test dnta, extensive quality control proce-
dures specified by the ETA were required initially and at periodic intervals
throughout the program.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler (CVS)
Constant volume samplers were flow calibrated prior to test start-up
in each of the test areas. A calibrated laminar flow element ("'erian Model
50, 0-1000 cfm) was utilized. Calibration of the element is triceahle to
the National Bureau of Standards.
CVS air flow, measured at the inlet to the CVS blower, was controlled
by throttling. Blower flow rates wert measured at ten incremental changes
in blower differential pressure. Auxiliary devices employed in the calibra-
tion were a nercury barometer, close tolerance mercury filled thermometers,
U-tube water and mercury manometers and an inclined water manometer,
^low data were subsequently computer processed. Fron these data, mid-range
CVS operating pressures and the corresponding absolute blower flow rate
was selected.
Subsequent flow calibrations were verified on a daily basis. This
was accomplished by metering up to 20 grams of instrument grade nropane
into the sampler. Recovery was specified by the EPA to be within nlus
or minus two percent of the metered quantity. Metering operations were
performed by the nropane bomb weight loss techniques. A balance, accurate
to 20 miligrams, was provided for this purpose.
2.5.2 Emissions Analyzers Console
Complete console instrumentation calibrations were performed initially
and at 30 day intervals. Calibration curves for the IIC, CO, C0>> and N0X
analytical systems were established using the EPA named gases listed in
21
-------
paragraph 2.4.5. Each CO and CC>2 instrument was calibrated at five relative
ly evenly spaced points across each operating range. The HC and N0X instru-
ments were calibrated at three points across each operating range. EPA
specified calibration tolerances of the smaller of plus or minus one percent
of full-scale or plus or minus five percent of measured value were
maintained. An additional curve check of each instrument was performed
at the low, medium and high range points of each operating range on a
weekly basis. Analytical system leak checks were performed on a daily
basis.
2.5.3 Chassis Dynamometer
Chassis dynamometers were calibrated initially and again after ma-jor
scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. Power and sneei. measuring instru-
ments were first calibrated using the hardware and procedures supplied by
the manufacturer. .Subsequent to this, a more exacting calibration was
performed using the coast-do\/n techniques of the federal Register. These
techniques were applied at inertia settings of three, four and five thou-
sand lbs and were also employed to verifv the inertia of the 1000 lb
auxiliary flywheel unit constructed to simulate the weight of a 1,000 lb
trailer.
2.5.4 Evaporative Emissions l'^uipnent
The SUF.fl, used in Denver to determine evaporative hvdroenrbon emissions
was calibrated in accordance with the nrocedures outlined in ^Ar Standard
T171. The hydrocarbon was calibrated using hvdrocarbon standard
gase3 listed in paragraph 2.4.5 and as further defined in paragraph
2.4.2. Thermocouple calibrations were verifier! using a precision mercury
filled thermometer.
-------
"eight pain of the charcoal canisters used in con1 unction with the
evaporative emission trapping procedures of the federal Register was meas-
ured using a balance of ?0 milligram accuracy. Trans were pre-dried
using the heated nitrogen procedure of the Federal Register.
2.5.5 Equipment for Special Additional Tasks
Lquipment developed specifically to facilitate the performance of
those tasks which utilized the SDS, namely the auxiliary braking svstcm,
required little in the way of special consideration. The only precaution
was to eliminate the oos9ibility of brake pad contact with the inertia
flywheel driving non-braking modes. This was accomplished by maintaining
a sizeable air gap between the flywheel and the brake nad contact area.
The auxiliary flywheel, used in the loaded vehicles and vehicles
towing trailers task, was designed for an inertia weight of 1,000 lbs.
before this unit was put into service the inertia was checked bv the
coast-down technique of the Federal Register and was found to bo verv
nearly 1,000 lbs. The procedures employed to develop road load
settings for the towed vehicles element of the task are discussed in
detail under paragraph 2.6.5.3.
With respect ..o the sound level task, the Model 2209 Precision Sound
Level Meter was calibrated in accordance with the recommendations of the
manufacturer. A Type 4220 Pistonphone Calibrator, which totally envelopes
the head of the microphone and emits a constant sound level of 124 db, was
used to calibrate the meter. A calibration was performed prior to each dav's
measurements and verified immediately before and after testinp. of each
vehicle.
23
-------
Sun Electric Company EPA-75 TIC and CO analyzers wore utilized to
measure HC and CO tailnipe emissions at engine idling conditions. The
instrument was calibrated initially by the local Sun Electric Companv
representative usinp; Sun provided standard calibration pases. During test-
ing, the analyzers were calibrated bv ATI, personnel within a r<*lativelv
short tine period before measurements were performed. pre-te.st calibration
was performed as specified by the manufacturer. The internal calibration
circuit or the instrument was utilized for this purpose.
2.6 TEST rrocrnunr.s
A variety of vehicle testing and flow procedures was employed
depending upon the specific tasks to which the vehicle was assigned.
Testing options for those vehicles subjected to tests beyond the basic
Federal Test Procedure (FTP) were developed and performed as follows:
In the Houston phase of the project, additional tests for modal
emissions and air conditioned vehicle emission ^actors development were
required. For those vehicles additionally tested for modal emissions only
the sequence was as follows;
riasic tttp
Modal Test
T^or those vehicles additionally tested for air conditioned emission
factors development only:
Basic FTP
Air conditioned vehicle tests
For those vehicles additionally tested for both modal emissions and
air conditioned vehicle factors:
Hasic rTP
24
-------
Air conditioned vehicle tests
Modal test
In the Denver phase, additional tests for evaporative emissions,
modal emissions and fuel economy were required. All vehicles were subjected
to fuel economy tests, ^or those vehicles additionally tested for modal
emissions only, the sequence was as follows;
liasic vT? and fuel economy test
Modal test
T"or those vehicles tested additionally for evaporative emissions only:
SUET) diurnal
Basic
Slim hot loss
Canister diurnal
TCasic FTP (replicate)
Canister hot loss
Fuel economy test
For those vehicles tested additionally for both modal emissions and
evaporative emissions, the modal test v;ns performed after the fuel economy
test in the latter of the above listed sequences.
» In the Detroit phase, additional tests for fuel economy, nodal emis-
sions, air conditioned vehicle emission factors and emissions from loaded
vehicles and vehicles towing trailers were performed. All vehicles were
subiected to fuel economy tests which were nerformed in conjunction T/ith
the ^TP. ^or those vehicles tested additionnllv for modal emissions only,
the testing sequence was as follows;
llasic and fuel economy test
Modal test
25
-------
vor those vehicles tested additionally for air conditioned vehicle
emission factors development onlv:
Basic ^TP and fuel economy test
Air conditioned vehicle test
For those vehicles tested additionally for loaded and towing vehicle
emissions only:
Basic FTP and fuel economy test
Loaded and towing vehicle tests
For those vehicles tested additionally for both modal emissions and
air conditioned vehicle emission factors development:
Basic FTP and fuel economy test
Air conditioned vehicle tests
Modal test
^or those vehicles tested additionally for both modal emissions and
loaded and towing vehicle emissions, the modal test was also utilized as
part of the loaded d towing vehicle test. The sequence was as follows:
Tjasic FTP and fuel economy test
Modal test
Loaded and towing vehicle tests
For the single vehicle tested additionally with regards to all tasks;
Basic FTP and fuel-economy test
Air conditioned vehicle tests
Modal test
Loaded and towing vehicle tests
The following paragraphs describe the vehicle pre-conditioning and test
procedures employed. Standard LV\ tests which have been used extensively
2 r.
-------
are described by reference only. Less commonly used testing procedures are
described in more detail.
2.C.1 Vehicle Preparation
The test sample was divided into two main proup
-------
initially applied to the system via the line from the tank to the fuel
pump. During the pressure check the line from the fuel tank to the vapor
collection system and any existing fuel return lines were plugged.
After five minutes in this condition the observed pressure was recorded.
Tvaporative control sytems were also inspected for proner operation.
:io corrective action was taken.
Following the pressure check, the tank was refilled with D-ro gallons
of Indolene 3D. 'Vs-received fuel remaining in the fuel svstcm was purged
by vehicle operation on city-tvpe streets for a nominal neriod of ten
minutes. At some later tine, the vehicle was parked to begin the specified
12-20 hour soak period. At the end of this interval, the tank was pumpei
ciry, the tank heati.ig blanket was installed and a thermocouple lead to
monitor tank fuel temperatures was installed. Installation was accomplished
via thermocouple insertion through a hole strategically drilled in the
gas tank cap. Preconditioned (cold) fuel was then added to forty percent
of tank capacity (to the nearest whole p.allon) such that the temperature of
the tank fuel after filling was CO plus or minus 2 degrees Fahrenheit. The
procedures of SAE Standard J 171 were then followed.
On the following day the canister test was performed. Vehicle oper-
ation in connection with SHFD tests of the previous dav served as the
canister test preconditioning orocedure.
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation
Prior to the first tesL of the dav, instruments which had been idle
or in a stand-by position were turned on to warm tin. luring the warm-
up interval, analytical system leak checks were performed and the
dynamometer was checked and warmed up in accordance with the Federal Register.
28
-------
The driver's aid recorder was calibrated. The analvtical .-.vstem was
checked for proper oneration and Rain, tuning and zero settinRS were
recorded. Conversion efficiency of the chemiluminescent instrument
thermal converter was checked and propane recovery tests were nerformed.
The fuel conditioning cart used in evaporative emission tests had
jecn charged with the proper amount of fuel on the previous day. The
temperature controller had been set to maintain the proper temperature.
Fuel tenperatures were closelv regulated in the final minutes prior to
the test.
2.6.3 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
Hasic or standard exhaust emission tests, performed on all vehicles
at all sitps, were conducted in Renera] accordance with the orocedures of
37 Federal "eRister 221 which deals with cold and hot start tests.
The exception was that hot start tests on non-evaporative test vehicles
were continued for the full 1372 seconds of the drivin" schedule. Data
obtained included cold and hot start transient and cold and hot start
stabilized emissions with the exception of evaporative tost vehicles.
Modifications to the analytical systems for testing 1975 and later model
year vehicles were not nrovided.
2.G.4 lodal Exhaust Lmission Test Procedures
Modal exhaust emission tests were nerformed on the seventy-five (75)
1972, 1973 and 1974 model-year vehicles in each site.
Modal exhaust emission measurements are comprised of two separate tests
the Surveillance Drivinp Sequence and steady states. I'ach set of tests was
preceeded by a soak period no jonRer than twontv minutes from the ]ast
sustained period of vehicle operation. At the end of the soak neriod the
vehicle was onerated at 50 miles nor hour for a period of three minutes.
-------
During this time lite dvnanometer load settinp was chocked and adjusted as
necessary, ''ithin one minute of the end of the 50 mnh cruise neriod the
vehicle was returned to idle and the SF>S test was " P",un.
The vehicle wa:. operated at Idle for a period of one minute. ^!o samp-
ling was nerformed during the first thirty seconds of this period. For the
remainder of the minute the dilute CVS exhaust sample was directed through
the analytical system sample circuit. At the start of the Surveillance
driving Sequence sampling was begun and vehicle operation and sampling
continued through the end of the SPS sampling period. The engine was
allowed to run an additional period of ten 3econds or longet. Steady
state tests were then performed.
The SDS is comprised of 32 acceleration and deceleration modes. These
modes consist of accelerations and decelerations between all nossihle
combinations of five speeds; 0 mph, 15 mph, 30 mph, 45 mph and f.O mph.
Average acceleration and decleration rates observed in a survey conducted
in the Los Angeles l'asin are used. Tn addition, six of the modes are
repeated using acceleration and deceleration rates higher and lower
than average rates observed in the survev.
For purposes of this study steady state tests w^re nerformed at
seven steady state or constant speed conditions; 0 pph (idle), 5 mph, in mph,
15 mph, 30 mph, 45 mph, and 60 npli.
During ST)S operations, a dilute CVS exhaust sannle was directed
through the analytical system and continuously monitored and recorded
on a strip chart recorder. The mass emissions during each acceleration
and decleration mode were calculated using the mass flo'T rate of the CVS
and integrated strip chart recorder data. In addition, emissions for the
30
-------
entire sequence were collected using the CVS bag collection technique of
the Federal lepister.
During steady state operations, emissions were collected and meas-
sured at each speed usin<» the same collection techniques. Equilibrium
was maintained for a minimum of 30 seconds at each test condition.
A minimum samolin?, time of t^ree minutes and a minimum samnle of two cubic
feet were provided at each of the steadv states.
2.0.5 r.vaoorative Emission Test Procedure
The SUED and canister procedures, applied to twenty !°73 model-vear
vehicles from the Denver sample, are described in the paragraphs which
follow.
2.6.5.1 SHIP Procedure - SKE0 evaporative emission tests were performed in
general accordance with SAK Standard J 171. The only significant departure
was in the area of time and temperature tolerances applied to the diurnal
phase of the test. Instead of the prescribed tank fuel temperature rise
of 24 degrees Fahrenheit in 60 plus or minus 10 minutes, a temperature
rise tolerance of 24 plus or minus two dp°reos in 60 minutes was provided.
The tolerance of plus or minus two decrees resulted from the initial
SAL J 171 tank fuel tolerance of (60) plus or minus one decree Fahrenheit
and the project imposed final tolerance of (84) plus or minus one depree
Fahrenheit. The diurnal phase of the test was terminated after 60 minutes.
Optional running loss measurements were not performed.
2.6.5.2 Canister Procedure - Canister method evaporative emission tests
were performed on the following day on the same vehicles in accordance
with the procedures of 37 Federal Register 221 (Section .'3r)."i73-n)
31
-------
2.6.6 Special Additional Tests
Test procedures used to perform additional tasks are described in the
paragraphs which follow.
2.6.6.1 Test Procedures for Loaded Vehicles and Vehicles Towing Trailers -
Loaded vehicle and towing vehicle tests were performed on forty-two (42)
Houston area vehicles, six each from the model-years 1°67-1Q73. Testing
was performed in general accordance with the modal exhaust emission test
procedures described in narap,raph 2.6.4. SOS and steady state tests were
performed at three settings:
With inertia weight and road load settings unchanged from the Federal
Register.
To simulate the addition of a maximum rate load of passengers and
baggage.
To simulate the addition of a trailer of a size recommended as suit-
able for that particular vehicle.
A ten minute soak period preceeded each test. During this time
inertia settings were changed as necessary. At the end of the soak period
the vehicle was operated at 50 miles per hour for a period of three
minutes. During this time the dynamometer load setting was checked
a.id adjusted as necesbary. The sampling and vehicle operating procedures
of paragraph 2.6.4 were then followed beginning with the one minute pre-test
idle period.
A prerequisite to the loaded vehicles and vehicles towing trailer task
was to determine dynamometer road load settings to simulate the road
load of both towing and towed vehicles. Three light-dutv vehicles
and a nominal 1,000 lb trailer were u9ed for this purpose. Two of the
light-duty vehicles, a 1970 Cadillac Coune De Ville, and a 1^7° Chrysler
4 door New Yorker, were utilized to develop the actual road load data.
-------
The third vehicle, a 1967 Jeep "agoneer, was used to test the sensitivity
of the measuring techniques. The assumption was that the toned vehicle
would exhibit less towing resistance behind the relatively high and
hlocky body configuration of the '.'agoneer than behind the lower and more
streamlined configuration of the Cadillac and Chrysler. A 5 by 8 foot
U-iiaul rental trailer was used in all cases as the towed vehicle. The
actual weight of the trailer was 930 lbs.
lhe method of determining the additional loading imposed on the
towing vehicle by the towed vehicle was as follows:
xlie speedometer of the towing vehicle was checked on the chassis
dynamoneter for a true speed indication of 50 miles per hour. Instrumen-
tation consisting of a vacuum transducer and a strip chart recorder were
installed in the towing vehicle and calibrated. The transducer was
installed in communication wit1, engine "iarifold vaccum. i!ultir>le bi-
directional 50 mile per hour nasses were made on a section of level road-
way. Manifold vacuum was recorded durinp each nass. The procedure wts
repeated until driving techniques improved to the* point whr»re d~ta were
consistently repeatable from run to run. The procedure waq then applied
to each of the towing vehicles operating with and without the trailer.
Each of the tawing vehicles was subsequently moved to the dynamometer for
the purpose of relating manifold vacuum readings to road load dynamo-.r_ ter
settings.
On the dynamometer each vehicle was or>erated at a constant speed of
50 miles per hour. Concurrently, dynamometer loading was varied in small
increments until the manifold vacuum values developed during road oper-
ations were consistently maintained. Observed load settings were recorded
33
-------
and subsequently converted to actual road load horsepower. Data were
then averaged to produce the following:
Vehicle Test Inertia Actual Road *F.R. Road
Condition Wt. (lbs) Load (hp) Load (hp)
Vagoneer Base Vehicle 4500 12.2 12.7
Veh & Trailer 5500 25.4
Difference 13.2
Cadillac Base Vehicle 5000 11.6 13.4
Veh & Trailer 6000 26.3
Difference 14.7
Chrysler Base Vehicle 4500 10.8 12.7
Veh & Trailer 5500 25.1
Difference 14.3
*Federal Register
As evidenced by these data, the procedures proved to be sensitive
to differing aerodynamic design. The relatively square configuration
of the Uagoneer resulted in the highest base vehicle road load power
requirements of the three vehicles. The Wagoneer towing the trailer
also resulted in the lowest difference in road load power renujrcments.
The difference between the experimental data and the settings of the
Federal Register can probably he accounted for by the fact that the data
were developed in Denver in air of lower density. For pumnses of the s
however, the data were considered representative.
A straight line was dratm between the 5,0^0 lb and 4,500 lb load
points and projected to 4,r,0r* lbs. The table shown below was developed
and applied in the testing program to simulate the ro?d load of vehicles
towing trailers.
Inertia Wt (lbs) Actual Road Load (hp)
Base Towing
4,000 12.0 25.n
4,500 12.7 27.0
5,000 13.4 28.1
34
-------
These results were ultimately used in the loaded vehicles and vehicles
towing trailers exhaust enissions testing task and the testing sequence
was performed at the following settings:
With inertia and road load settings of the federal Register.
With the road load setting of the Federal Register unchanged hut
at 500 lbs. additional inertia weight.
.'ith the inertia weight of the Federal Register increased by 1,000
lbs at the road load settings established for vehicles towing a
1,00') lb. trailer.
2.6.6.2 Te^.t Procedures for Air Conditioned Vehicle Emission Factors
Development - These tc:sts were performed on 20 ehicles each in Houston and
Detroit. Five vehicles from each of the model-years 1973, 1°71, 196°
and 1967 were initially scheduled to be tested at each site. Vehicle
selection in Detroit was subsequently modified and weiphted toward the more
recent model-year vehicles. Vehicles chosen were equipped with factory
installed, manually controlled air conditioners in proper operating
condition.
Testing procedures consisted of three Federal 1372 hot start tests,
transient and stabi-ized segments, in addition to the original test by the
basic ^TP driving schedule. Each test was preceeded by a ten minute soak.
The original test was performed with the air conditioner off, but simulated
by the additional ten Dercent load setting of the Federal Register. Hot
start tests were performed as follows:
ilot Start Test A/C A/C Simulation
1st (part of off on
original test)
2nd
on
off
3rd
off
of*
4th
off
on
35
-------
During the second tpst the air conditioner iwr, set for maximum
cooling wit1! the fan on an intermediate level. The driver's window was
fully open during each test. All other windows were closed.
Road load settings were changed as necessary immediately after
the hot stabilized portion of each test was completed. The test vehicle
was used to maLc changes.
2.6.6.3 Test Procedures for ^uel Economy - i?uel economy tests were per-
formed on all vehicles in Denver and Detroit. Starting with each vehicle in
a warmed-up condition (at least 7.5 miles of operation occuring within
thirty-five minutes of the start of ore-conditioning), each vehicle was
operated at 50 mph for a period of three minutes, "ithin one minute of
the end of the cruise period the vehicle commenced operation over the
EPA Highway ruel Economv Test Schedule. A CVS sample hap was initiated
two seconds prior to the start of the schedule and terminated two seconds
after the end of the schedule.
2.6.6.4 Test Procedures for Sound Level - Sound level tests were performed
on 85 San Antonio area vehicles from model-years 1967 through 1973. All
85 vehicles were subjected to a combination of the SAE .T 986a procedure
and five EPA specified Use Cycle Modes. In addition 10 vehicles were fur-
ther tested at two idle modes for use in decibel contour development.
The SAE 986a procedure involves sound level measurement while the
vehicle is operated within the prescribed range of measurement. During
this procedure the microphone is situated 50 feet from the centerline of
the vehicle path at a height of four feet above the ground plane. From
an approach speed of 30 mph, WOT is established when the front of the vehicle
reaches a line 25 feet before a line through the microphone normal to the
36
-------
vehicle path. The lowest transmission Rear or range is used such that the
front of the vehicle will have reached or passed a line 25 feet beyond the
microphone line when maximun. rated engine speed is reached. At this point
the throttle is closed and the test continued until the vehicle reaches a
line 125 feet beyond the microphone line.
The EPA Use Cycle Modes are comprised of the following:
A 20 mph cruise.
A AO mph cruise.
A 60 mph cruise.
A 1/4 f> acceleration from a stop.
An idle mode.
Measurements during the cruise and acceleration modes of thp use cycle
were taken during the interval from where the front of the vehicle reached
a line 25 feet before the microphone line to a line 25 feet beyond the
microphone line. Idle mode measurements were taken from t>e driver's side
at curb idle (Drive f>ear for automatic transmisson equipped vehicles) on
the centerline of the vehicle. The distance from the microphone to the
perimeter of the vehicle at which the hiphest sound level occured was
reported.
Use cycle cruise modes were performed on automatic transmission equip-
ped vehicles in the highest drive pear. For manual transmission equipped
vehicles; the 20 mph cruise mode was performed with the transmission in
the second to highest gear; 40 mph and 60 mph cruise modes were performed
in the highest pear. The 1/4 r: acceleration was performer in the drive
range for automatic transmission equipped vehicles. This mode was performed
in first gear for manual transmission equipped vehicles.
37
-------
Decibel contours were developed at two idle modes, cu.1: idle and loOD
rpm. Curb idle measurements were performed in drive pear for automatic
transmission equipped vehicles. The contour developed for 13CH rpm war?
performed in a neutral Rear. The method employed for this tvne of testing
is described belou.
From the geometric confer of the vehicle, 16 equally spaced radii were
established. Alonp, each radius, measurements were taken at three foot inter-
vals from the geometric center unless the measurement required the equip-
ment to he vjithin the area above the "shadow" of the vehicle. In this
case, the first measurement was talen at the first interval heyond the
shadow. Thereafter, there were seven additional readings taken at three
foot intervals. Beyond these ei^ht measurements there were six additional
measurements obtained at 48, SO, 72, "4, and 'If, feet from the geometric
center. On each radius once the sound level dropped to a noint 5 dbA
above the ambient, the test on that radius was considered to he complete.
Also, for each idle node, t"o measurements were ta^en at the driver's
position within the vehicle. Th<= first was taken th the windows closed
and the second was tal'en 'Hth the windows open. During these measurements
the operator was situated in the driver's seat. Microphone placement
as near the onerator's ri^,ht ear with the head oointed toward the roof
of the vehicle.
All measurements were taken on the dbA scale usinp, the slow response
circuit of the sound level meter described in paragraph 2.4.7.3 of this
report. Rms values as opposed to peak values were measured.
A drawing showing the layout of the drag-strip where sound level tests
were performed is shown below. As incdicated in the sl-etch, measurements
38
-------
were taken while the test vehicle was operated or parked on the
northern half of the track approximately 0.4 miles from the nearest malor
reflective surface, the grandstands. The onlv protrusions in the vicinity
of the test area were a number of round 6 inch drameter lipiht standards.
The standards, rising 25 to 30 feet into the air, were situated on both
sides of the track at 50 foot intervals.
The terrain of the area was relatively flat for several hundred feet
on botli sides of the track. The ground plane in this area was composed of
a well compacted clay-like material, sparsely covered with a thin prowth
of vegetation, '/hat little vegetation did exist was cropped two to three
inches from the rround.
A sketch showinp the manner in which vehicles were situated for
decibel contour development is also provided in the drawing. During
contour development, each test vehicle was headed north and centered on
the axis of the radii. The first set of readings was taken alon" the
radius line to the front of the vehicle (0.0). The sr.cond set was
taken 22.4 decrees from the 0.0 decree line in a clockwise direction as
viewed from the top of the vehicle. Thereafter, measurements were taken
alonj» each radius l_n2, until the 0.0 depree line was reached. The
measurement procedures were identical for both curb idle and 2500 rpm
operations.
2.G.G.5 After Test Procedures - On completion of emissions testinp, engine
idle speed, ignition timing and dwell, and tailpipe CO and lie were measured
and recorded. Tailpipe CO and ilC measurements were taken at curb idle
with both laboratory and ftarape type inspection instrumentation.
39
-------
Microphone O
Path of o
vehicles
during
testing O
3000
Feet
O
O
270
Asphalt
Test
Track
90*
Test vehicle
in position for
contour tests.
Showing radii and
radial lines.
North
O
Chain Link
Fence
Grandstand
Light
Standard
SKETCH OF
ASPHALT TEST
TRACK USED
IN SOIJMD LEVEL
TESTING
X"
Wooden Fence
40
-------
2.6*7 Daily Test Schedule
Test schedules were dictated by the project time constraints and
tasks assigned to each site. Henerallv, the work was Tierformed at the
rate of two shifts per day. In Houston and Detroit the more lengthy tests
were scheduled for completion in the early stages of testing. In Houston,
for example, tests were scheduled at the rate of one air conditioned
vehicle emissions test and one modal emissions test per shift until one
or more of these tasks were completed, "ork shifts were rounded out with
the required number of basic federal emission tests. Similarly, Detroit
testing was scheduled at the rate of one air conditioned vehicle emissions
test and one loaded vehicle and vehicles towinp, trailers amissions test
per shift. Modal emissions tests and hasic federal emissions tests were
phased in at varying rates as the additional testinp, tasks were completed.
In Denver, on the other hand, the more basic tests were performed first
and the more len^thv evaporative emissions tests were performed last.
2.7 DATA HANDLriC
An important phase of the program was the orderly accumulation, verifi-
cation, analysis and transmittal of data. In recognition, an elaborate
data collection and verification svstem was implemented. Data handling,
processing and calculation nrocedures are described in the T>ara°,raphs which
follow.
2.7.1 Data Collection
Data were checked at each site for completeness and transmitted to
the Denver office for processing. Transmitted packets included all
strip charts and raw data sheets for each vehicle tested the nrevious day.
On receipt in Denver, the packets were checked to verify that all
41
-------
required materials had been transmitted. Data forms were additionally
checked for conpleteness.
2.7.2 Data Processing
Processing was performed manually and by computer operations. Data
were first transmitted to computer mincli tape and nlaced in computer storage.
An edit prop,ram was then utilized to screen for keypunch and logical errors.
Corrections were made as necessary and raw data were output for proof
readinp. apainst raw data input "orms. Data were further corrected as
necessary. Processing operations were then completed and finished copy
were output and inspected in detail. Questionable data were noted and
returned for further verification and processing.
2.7.3 Calculation of Results
The basic calculations of emission results for each of the various
tasks were performed by use of the formulae in 37 federal Repister 221,
36 Federal Register 123 and as amended in 38 Rederal Register 124.
Fuel economy data were calculated usinp the carbon balance equation (1)
from Anpendix III of "Automotive F.xl.aust remission Surveillance - Analysis of
the FY 72 Propram, (JT\-046/2—74-001), piven on papr ITT - 3. A hvdropen/
carbon ratio of 1.35 was assumed even though Denver area fuel was found to
have a ratio of about 2.20.
Variations used for each tasl- are described in the naratranhs -.Thich
follow.
2.7.3.1 Exhaust Emissions (redprnl Test Procedure) - Emission results were
calculated as outlined in the Federal Repister. In addition, cold start
(197? FTP equivalent) results were calculated by sunninp the total
omissions of the co]'l transient and cold stabilized phases of the test
and dividin;; the total Ey 7.5 miles, "'ot start results were calculated
42
-------
by summing the total emissions of the hot transient and hot stabilized
phases and divding by 7.5 miles to obtain f>raras per mile.
2.7.3.2 Modal Emissions - The formulae of the Federal Register were used
to calculate modal emissions usinj» the mass flow ra_e of the CVS, integrated
dilute concentration readings and miles per mode. The humidity correction
factor of the Federal Register was not apnlied to modal data. Steady
state results were calculated uslnp, mass flow rate, sample bag concentra-
tions and the calculated distance traveled per increment of time. Results
of the idle mode were calculated in nrams per minute. Samole har. test
results were computed using the distance constant of 9.709 miles for the
HDS. Steady state data, excluding 5 mph and 10 rmh, and modal data were
combined to produce integrated emission results equivalent to ti'C hat>
results.
2.7.3.3 Fuel Economy - Fuel Economy data were calculated usinf» the CVS
emission test results as calculated by the equations of the Federal Ret^s-
ter and the fuel economy equation referenced in paragraph 2.7.3. The
tiighway Fuel economy Test distance constant of ]0.2 milcis per test was
applied.
2.7.3.4 Evaporative Emissions - Evaporative emissions measured by the can-
ister method were obtained from the trap weight before and after the test.
The difference in weight is reported.
Evaporative losses bv the SPfn techninue were calculated in accordance
with the equations of SAE J171.
2.7.3.5 Air Conditioned Vehicle Emissions - Emissions from air conditioned
vehicles were calculated in the manner de^crlbpd in parafiranh 2.7.3.1
for the hot start tests.
A3
-------
2.7.3.6 Lmissions fro.i Loaded Vehicles and Vehicles Towing Trailers -
Emission test results from loaded vehicles and vehicles toi/inp, trailers
,-ere calculated in the manner described for nodal emission;; in nrtrnpranh
2.7.3.2.
2.7.3.7 Sound Level Tests - These data are comprised of simple averages
as required in SAT. T9of>a and required no special treatment.
44
-------
3. TEST RESULTS
3.1 DISCUSSION OF EXHAUST EMISSION AND FUEL ECONOMY TEST RESULTS
3.1.1 Federal Test Procedure and Highway Fuel Economy Test Exhaust
Emissions and Fuel Economy
Test results by model-year are presented for each site on the three
pages comprising Table 3 which follow this paragraph. Emissions data
are summarized as follows;
Test
Procedure City HC CO NO^.
mean
S.D.
mean
S.D.
mean
S.T).
1972
1975
Denver
6.87
6.17
2.99
2.63
108.5
99.0
43.8
41.5
2.84
2.87
1.41
1.46
1972
1975
Houston
5.95
5.20
3.76
3.34
80.7
70.7
47.4
44.5
5.27
5.39
2.46
2.55
1972
1975
Detroit
6.71
5.85
7.26
6.59
77.2
66.8
50.0
43.3
5.14
5.31
2.07
2.17
As Indicated, HC and CO emissions from the Denver sample are higher
than those from the Houston and Detroit samples. N0X emissions in
Denver are considerably lower. Similarly, HC emissions from the Detroit
sample are higher than those from the Houston sample, although Detroit-
area CO emissions are lower. This can probably be attributed to one
or more high HC emitting 1968 model-year vehicles (from Table 3) in the
Detroit sample.
Fuel economy data for the three samples are summarized below. The
Highway Fuel Economy Test (HFET) was not performed in Houston.
45
-------
City
^uel I-conony bv Procedure, (mnp.)
19,2
1975
ncan
ncan S. D
mean S.D
Denver
12.2 2.84 12.^ 2.07 lfj.2 4.36
Houston
10.0 2.31 11.4 2.33
Detroit
11.7 2.60 r.2 ".6 r, 17.7 3.^1
As indicated in the data ahove, fuel economy measured 'w the
Highway ^uel Hconomy Te^st apnears to be about 507 htr,her than fuel economy
measured hy the ^TP. The !Pr"' driving, schedule, however, i^ comprised
of operation at relatively constant speed with an average speed of
48.f> miles per hour and two idle modes of relatively short duration
while the TP drvinf, schedule is connrised of operation at varying speeds
with an average speed of less than 20 miles nor hour and eighteen idle
modes of varying duration.
46
-------
TABLE 3
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS VS MODEL YEAR
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FUEL ECONOMY
MODEL
H OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
HFET
YEAR
VEH
MILEAGE
MEAN
S
D.
MEAN
S.D
MEAN
S D.
MEAN
S
D
MEAN
S
D
MEAN S
D.
1967
17
66358
11 02
3
58
156 9
17 0
163 1
110 3
2 26
1
33
11 9
2
16
17 6 3
51
1968
18
63522
8 11
3
31
106.8
36.6
197 1
126 9
3 15
1
28
12 8
2
11
19 1 3
88
1969
21
51687
7 98
2,
¦ 59
115 5
11.8
516 2
90 6
3 67
1
61
12 3
2
00
18 3 2
59
1970
22
15723
7 53
2
70
117.6
35 5
526.1
116 8
3.11
1.
.18
12 1
2.
,22
17 6 3
61
1971
27
32651
6 16
1
71
106 7
25 2
535-6
158.6
3.09
1
15
12.3
3
16
18 2 1.
.67
1972
30
27161
5.92
2,
• 03
98 5
52 0
551 1
167.O
3 30
1
51
12 2
3
28
18 1 5.
.30
1973
35
11331
5 03
1
95
93 3
11 9
556 2
168.8
1 99
93
12 3
3
16
18 1 5
32
1971
10
5251
1.17
0
55
83 1
11.6
626 1
177.1
1 81
67
11 5
2
71
16 7 1
06
TOTALS
180
37111
6 87
2
.99
108 5
13 1
533 6
116.9
2 81
1
11
12 2
2
81
18 2 1
36
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FUEL ECONOMY
MODEL
# OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
HFET
YEAR
VEH.
MILEAGE
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S.D.
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S
D
MEAN
S
D
MEAN S,
,D
1967
17
66358
9,
.87
2 87
116 1
12 5
117.5
106.1
2 22
1
33
12.5
2.
,12
17 6 3
51
1968
18
63522
7
65
3.29
97.0
31 1
176.7
118.6
3 21
1
37
13 6
2
62
19 1 3
88
1969
21
51687
7,
.07
2 20
101.6
38.7
501 0
85-8
3.76
1
61
12 9
2
00
18 3 2
59
1970
22
15723
6
• 56
2.07
105.2
31.7
511 2
112 6
3 22
1
55
12 7
2
30
17.6 3,
.61
1971
27
32651
5
.51
1.50
96 9
22 2
521.7
153 7
3.18
1
25
12. 8
3
27
18 2 1
67
1972
30
27161
5
10
1.92
90.5
53-3
533 8
158 9
3 29
1
• 55
12 8
3
16
18 1 5
30
1973
35
11331
1
51
1 79
81.7
11 3
533 6
159 3
1 96
87
13 0
3
68
18 1 5
32
1971
10
5251
1
19
0 50
79.0
11 7
601 1
171.3
1.81
82
12 0
2
91
16 7 1
06
TOTALS
180
37111
6
17
2.63
99 0
11.5
515 2
110 1
2 87
1
16
12 9
2
97
18 2 1
36
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80011
n I
-------
TABLE 3
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS VS MODEL YEAR
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL
tt OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
YEAR
VEH.
MILEAGE
MEAN
S.D.
MEAN
S.D.
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S
D.
MEAN
S
D
1967
17
73240
10.07
1) 44
134.
1
68.3
597 3
113.9
4.43
1.
,81
10.6
2,
.05
1968
18
68205
9 32
6.68
101
9
45-5
649.8
140.9
6.38
2.
.79
10.6
1
85
1969
21
63563
5 39
1.76
71.
¦ 3
38 7
623.4
105 4
7 02
2
34
11.8
1.
.82
1970
22
58115
5.19
1.47
71.
,8
22.9
682.8
136.5
5 67
2.
.09
10.9
2
17
1971
27
37988
5 39
2.31
77
7
47 1
653.0
158 5
5.69
2.
.43
11.2
2
77
1972
30
2661)7
5.14
3 79
76
2
41 4
689.7
185.0
5.61
2.
,44
10.7
2,
.52
1973
35
11)1)58
4.73
2.10
68.
,8
43.0
692 5
189 1
3 76
1
90
10 9
2.
.50
197 ^
10
5478
3-92
1 21
54
1
29.4
772.8
176 6
3 30
1
40
10.2
2,
.15
TOTALS
1 O
1 CO
1 rH
11515
5-95
3.76
80
7
47 4
668 1
160.1
5.27
2
46
10 9
2
31
FUEL ECONOMY
HFET
MEAN S.D.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL
« OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
YEAR
VEH.
MILEAGE
MEAN
S.
,D.
MEAN
S D.
MEAN
S.D.
MEAN
S.
• D.
MEAN
S
D
1967
17
73240
8,
.82
3.
,66
122.0
61.1
582
4
104 4
4
54
1,
.86
11 1
2
09
1968
18
68205
8
22
6,
.11
87 .0
43 2
629
7
131.3
6
59
2,
.77
11 2
1
92
1969
21
63563
4
59
1
23
59 4
33.4
613
6
96 3
7
20
2.
• 51
12.3
1
90
1970
22
58145
4
52
1
38
59 3
20 9
663
7
130 1
5
79
2
11
11 5
2,
.18
1971
27
37988
4
70
2
16
67 8
43 4
634 ,
.5
152.0
5
85
2
58
11.7
2,
.84
1972
30
26647
4
54
3
59
67.8
40.2
668,
,4
176.6
5
70
2
55
11 2
2,
.64
1973
35
14458
4
12
1
57
62.2
43.8
671,
,2
180.9
3
82
1
98
11.3
2,
.58
1974
10
5478
3.
• 57
1.
,05
49 7
30 2
749
1
163 2
3.
• 34
1.
,42
10 6
2
10
TOTALS
180
41515
5
20
3
34
70.7
44 5
649,
,i)
151.6
5
39
2
55
11.4
2.
.38
FUEL ECONOMY
HFET
MEAN S.D
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1.1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80011
-------
TABLE 3
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS VS MODEL YEAR
DETROIT
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FUEL ECONOMY
MODEL
« OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
HFET
YEAR
VEH .
MILEAGE
MEAN
S
D
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S .D
MEAN
s
D
MEAN S
D
MEAN S
D
1967
17
68791
11 16
5
13
131
5
56 1
515 6
108 0
1 63
1
92
11 2 1.
89
16.8 2
85
1968
18
57130
10 56
16
85
91
5
71 3
562 8
93.1
6 05
2
70
12 0 2
61
18 2 3
50
1969
21
51761
7.68
5
07
89
3
18 9
561 9
101.1
5.90
1
53
12 2 2
11
18 7 3
11
1970
22
1)1618
6.71
6
11
77
1
27 3
602 3
110.5
6 30
1
85
11 9 2
11
18.2 3
35
1971
27
35190
1 85
2
.07
60
9
28 9
622 1
186 1
5 31
1
81
12 1 3
22
18 1 1,
,61
1972
30
25189
6 25
7
11
78
5
60 2
613 5
161.8
5 21
2,
.21
11 3 2
87
17 1 1
17
1973
35
19010
1 13
2
12
51
7
22 5
660.2
171 6
1 03
1
51
11 7 2
79
17 8 1
29
1971
10
6109
1 11
2
10
17
7
27 1
719 6
170 3
3 19
1.
,18
10 6 1
90
15 6 3
05
TOTALS
180
37715
6 71
7
26
77
2
50 0
617.6
153 2
5 11
2
07
11 7 2
60
17 7 3
91
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
FUEL ECONOMY
MODEL
11 OF
AVERAGE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FTP
HFET
YEAR
VEH
MILEAGE
MEAN
S
D .
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S D
MEAN
S
D.
MEAN
S
D
MEAN S
D
1967
17
68791
9 91
1
99
120 0
50
0
528 1
105 2
1 61
1
91
11 9
1
91
16 8 2
85
1968
18
57130
9 11
15
56
75 5
51
6
551 9
86 6
6 11
2,
.81
12 6
2
17
18 2 3
50
1969
21
51761
6.56
H
59
71 8
38
D
519 1
99.8
6.21
1
62
12 9
2.
,17
18 7 3
11
1970
22
11618
6 00
5
76
67 2
25.
5
588 3
106 3
6 19
1,
• 91
12 1
2
12
18 2 3
35
1971
27
35190
n 01
1
17
50 3
26
7
606 6
179-2
5.56
1
91
12 7
3.
39
18 1 1
61
1972
30
25189
5 18
6
38
69 5
5"
6
625 6
155.2
5 36
2
38
11.8
2.
,91
17 1 1
17
1973
35
19010
3 85
1
15
19 1
21
6
611 5
163 6
1 05
1,
.52
12 1
2
81
17 8 1
29
1971
10
6109
3.65
1
79
11 8
25
8
732.8
162.3
3 51
1
35
11 0
1
89
15 6 3,
.05
TOTALS
1 O
1 GO
1
37715
5 85
6
59
66 8
13
3
602 1
116.9
5 31
2
17
12 2
2
66
17 7 3
91
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80011
-------
3.1.1.1 Vehicles ''Icqtin,", T?edernl Emission f>tandnrds - Data relative to
vehicles at each «?tre noetinr, federal 1972, 1973/1974 ind ln7r> emissions
standards are shorm in Table 4. The six pap.os conprisln^ Tahle 4 follow
thin paragraph. Data arc surcnarized as follows;
Standard Vehicles Meeting Standards
'1C rn ;.'0V »oth or All
(!o.)
(")
Co.)
C)
Ho.) C)
('Jo.)
£2
Denver
1°72
13
7.1
7
3.9
N/A
4
2.2
1073/1°74
13
7.2
7
3.o
P4 6 3.3
1
n.f>
1075
1
o.r>
0
n.1
114 r,3.3
0.0
Houston
10 7?.
20
n.i
24
13.3
N/A
1?
6.7
lrt73/197A
2D
li.i
24
13.3
32 17.8
fi
3.3
1«75
0
n.n
2
1.1
33 18.3
0.0
Detroit
107?
27
15.1
32
17. a
:j/a
17
0.4
1073/1974
27
15.0
32
37.ft
28 15.6
5
2. P.
19 75
1
o.r,
2
1.1
30 IP,. 7
0
o.o
-------
YEAR
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1 972
1973
1974
TOTAI
MODEI
YEAR
1967
J 968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
TABLE 4
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
n OF <3.4 GM/^I
VEH. NO. %
CO
<39 GM/MI
NO. %
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
18
0
0.0
1
5.6
21
1
4.8
1
4.8
22
1
4.5
0
0.0
27
1
3.7
0
0.0
30
3
10.0
2
6.7
35
7
20.0
3
8.6
10
0
0.0
0
0.0
180
13
7.2
7
3.9
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
n.o
3. 3
5.7
0.0
2.2
1973/1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
NOX
PASSED
H OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THRh"!"
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
14
82.4
0
0.0
18
0
0.0
1
5.6
9
50.0
0
0.0
21
1
4.8
1
4.8
10
47.6
0
0.0
22
1
4.5
0
0.0
13
59.1
0
0.0
27
1
3.7
0
0.0
14
51.9
0
0.0.
30
3
10.0
2
6. 7
14
46. 7
0
0.0
35
7
20. 0
3
8.6
31
88.6
1
2.9
10
0
0.0
0
0.0
9
90.0
0
0.0
180
13
7.2
7
3.9
1 14
63.3
1
0.6
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIESt IMC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURO-RA, COLO. 80011
51
-------
TABLE 4> CONT'D
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC CO NOX PASSED
MODEL
n of
<1.5
GM/MI
<15
GM/MI
<3.1
GM/MI
ALL
THREK
YEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
1967
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
14
82.4
0
0.0
1968
18
0
0.0
0
0.0
10
55. 6
0
0.0
1969
21
0
0.0
0
0.0
8
38.1
0
0.0
1970
22
0
0.0
0
0.0
It
50.0
0
0.0
1971
27
0
0.0
0
0.0
15
5:>.6
0
0.0
1972
30
0
0.0
0
0.0
15
50. 0
0
0.0
1973
35
1
2.9
0
0.0
32
91.4
0
0.0
1974
10
0
0.0
0
0.0
9
90. o
0
0.0
TOTALS
180
1
0.6
0
0.0
114
63.3
0
0. "1
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES*INC.
19900 E. COLFAX» AURORA» COLO. 80 J1J
52
-------
TABLE 4
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
_
HC
CO
MODEL
n of
<3.
4 GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
PASSED
BOTH
rEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
*
NO.
%
1967
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1968
18
1
5.6
0
0.0
0
0.0
1969
21
0
0.0
4
19.0
0
0.0
1970
2?
0
0.0
1
4.5
0
0.0
197]
27
3
11.1
4
14.8
3
11.1
1972
30
3
10.0
2
6.7
1
3.3
1973
35
9
25.7
8
22.9
4
11.4
1971
10
4
40.0
5
50.0
4
40.0
TOTALS
180
20
11.1
24
13.3
12
6.7
1973/1974 1
-EDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
NOX
PASSED
MODEL
a OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
AL
THREE
YEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
*
NO.
%
1967
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
4
23.5
0
O.U
1968
18
1
5.6
0
0.0
1
5.6
0
0.0
1969
21
0
0.0
4
19.0
1
4.8
0
0.0
1970
2?
0
0.0
1
4.5
1
4.5
0
0.0
1 971
27
3
11.1
4
14.8
5
18.5
0
0.0
1972
30
3
10.0
2
6.7
3
10.0
0
0.0
1973
35
9
25.7
8
22.9
12
34.3
3
8.6
1 974
10
4
40.0
5
50. 0
5
50.0
3
30.0
TOTALS
180
20
11.1
24
13.3
32
17.8
6
3.3
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES' INC*
19900 E. COLFAX» AURORA# COLO. 80011
53
-------
TABLE 4» CONT'D
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDAROS
HOUSTON
1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC CO NOX PASSED
MODEL
n of
<1.5
GM/MI
<15
GM/MI
<3.1
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
YEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
X
NO.
%
NO.
%
1967
17
0
0.0
0
0.0
4
23.5
0
0.0
1968
18
O
0.0
0
0.0
1
5.6
0
0.0
1969
21
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
4.8
0
0.0
1970
22
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
4.5
0
0.0
1971
27
0
0.0
0
0.0
5
18.5
0
n.o
1972
30
0
0.0
0
0.0
4
13.3
0
0.0
1973
35
0
0.0
2
5.7
12
34.3
0
0.0
1971
10
0
0.0
0
0.0
5
50.0
0
0.0
TOTALS
180
0
0.0
2
1.1
33
18.3
0
o
•
O
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES>INC.
19900 E. COLFAX * AURORA* COLO. 80011
54
-------
TABLE 4
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DETROIT
1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
MODEL
« OF
<3 .
4 GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
P AS'iED
BOTH
YE*R
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
*
NO.
%
196 7
17
0
o.n
n
0. ')
0
0.0
1 Qn8
18
0
o. n
3
16. 7
0
0.0
196^
21
0
o.n
1
4.8
0
0.0
1970
2 J
3
13.6
2
9. 1
2
9.1
1971
27
4
14.8
3
11.1
2
7.4
1 9 72
30
7
23.3
7
23. 3
4
13.3
1973
35
c
25.7
I I
31.4
5
14.3
1974
in
4
HO.')
5
50. 0
4
<40. 0
TOTALS
I BO
27
15.0
32
17.8
17
9 .a
1973/1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
NOX
PASSED
MODEL
« OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39 GM/MI
<3.0
GM/ -tl
ALL
THREr
YEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO. %
NO.
%
NO.
%
1967
17
0
0.')
0 0.0
3
17.6
0
0.0
196H
18
0
o.n
3 16.7
4
22.2
0
0.0
1969
21
0
o.n
1 a. 8
0
0.0
0
0.0
197P
2V
3
13.6
2 9.1
1
4.5
1
4.5
1971
27
4
14.8
3 1 l . 1
4
14.8
0
o.n-
1 972
30
7
23.3
7 23.3
4
13. 3
1
3.3
1973
35
9
25. 7
1J 31.u
7
20.0
1
2.9
1 °74
10
4
40.0
5 50.0
5
50. n
2
20.0
TOTALS
180
27
15.0
32 17.8
28
15.6
5
2.8
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES*INC.
19J0H E. COLFAX» AURORA* COLO. 80011
-------
TABLE CONT'D
VEHICLES MEETING FEDERAL STANDARDS
DETROIT
1975 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HC
CO
NOX
PAS ED
MODEL
n of
<1,5
GM/MI
<15 GM/MI
<3.1 GM/MI
ALL
THRE-
YEAR
VEH.
NO.
%
NO. %
NO. %
NO.
SH
1967
17
0
0.0
0 0.0
3 17.6
0
0.0
1968
18
0
0.0
0 0.0
4 2 2.2
0
O.U
1969
21
0
0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0
0.0
1970
22
0
o.o
0 0.0
1 1.5
0
0.0
1971
27
0
n. n
0 0.0
4 14.8
0
0.0
1972
30
0
0.0
0 0.0
5 16,7
0
0.0
1973
35
0
0.0
1 2.9
8 2°. 9
0
0.0
1971+
10
1
10.0
I 10.0
5 50.0
0
0.0
TOTALS
180
1
o
•
2 1.1
30 16.7
0
O
o
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES»INC.
19>)00 E. COLFAX» AURORA* COLO. 80011
56
-------
3.1.1.2 1972 Vehicles Meeting 1972 Federal Standards - Data relative to
the 1972 model-year vehicles at each site meeting 1972 Federal emissions
standards are shown in Table 5. The three pages comprising Table 5 follow
this paragraph. Data are summarized as follows:
1972 Vehicles Meeting 1972 Standards
HC
CO
BOTH
(No.)
(7.)
(No.) m
(No.) (Z)
Denver
3
m.o
2 6.7
1 3.3
Houston
3
10.0
2 6.7
1 3.3
Detroit
7
23.3
7 23.3
4 13.3
57
-------
TABLE b
1972 VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
VEHICLE B OF <3.4 GM/MI
MAKE VEH. NO. MS
CO
<39 GM/MI
NO. %
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DATSUN
DODGE
FORD
LINCOLN
2
7
1
2
6
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0.0
28.6
0.0
n.o
O.J
0.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
i o n. n
o.o
o.o
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.c
0.0
0.0
0.0
MERCURy 1
OLDSMORILE 2
OPEL 1
PLYMOUTH 2
PONTI AC 2
TOYOTA 1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.0
50 . 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50. 0
0.0
0. 3
0. 'I
0.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.0
50.D
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
0. iJ
VOLKSWAGEN 2
TOTALS 30
0
3
0 . 0
10.0
0
2
0.0
6.7
0
1
0. (I
3.
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES»INC.
19<)00 E. COLFAX > AURORA, COLO. 80JH
56
-------
TABLE 5
1972 VEHICLES MErTING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HOUSTON
1972 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
VEHICLE 8 OF <3. <4 GM/MI
MAKE VEH. NO. %
CO
<39 GM/MI
NO. %
PASSED BOTH
NO. %
BUICK
CHEVROLET
DATSUN
2
7
1
1
2
0
50.0
28. 6
0.0
1
0
1
50. 0
0.0
10O.0
50. 0
0.0
0.0
00 iGE
FORD
LINCOLN
6
1
0. U
0.0
n.o
o
o
o
o. o
o.o
o.o
o
o
o
0.0
0.0
0.0
MERCURY 1
OLDSMOBTLE 2
OPEL 1
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PLYMOUTH
PONTIAC
TOYOTA
2
2
1
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.n
o.o
o.o
o.o
o
o
0
0. I)
o.o
o.o
VOLKSWAGEN 2
TOTALS 30
0
3
0.0
10.0
0
2
0.0
6. 7
0
O.O
3. ^
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES»INC.
19-'0r: E. COLFAX t AURO>
-------
TABLE 5
1972 VEHICLES MEETING 1972 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DETROIT
1972 FEDERAL TEST
PROCEDURE
•
HC
CO
VEHICLE
8 OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
PASSED
BOTH
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
BUICK
2
0
0.0
0
0. 0
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
7
3
<42.9
1
14.3
1
14.3
DATSUN
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
DODGE
2
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
FORD
6
1
16.7
2
33.3
1
16.7
LINCOLN
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
MERCURY
1
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
OLDSMOBILE
2
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
OPEL
1
1
lon.n
1
100.0
1
100.0
PLYMOUTH
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
PONTIAC
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0 .0
TOYOTA
1
1
100.0
1
100.0
1
10 0.0
VOLKSWAGEN
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTALS
30
7
23.3
7
23.J
4
13.3
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES' INC.
19U0 E. COLFAX » AURORA» COLO. 80>-1L
-------
3.1.1.3 1973 Vehicles Meeting 1973 Federal Standards - Data relative to
the 1973 model-year vehicles meeting 1973 Federal emission standards are
shown In Table 6. The three pages comprising Table 6 follow this paragraph
Data are summarized as follows:
City 1973 Vehicles Meeting 1973 Standards
HC
CO
NOx
All
Three
(No.)
(*)
(No.)
(%)
(No.)
(%)
(No.)
tz)
Denver
7
20.0
3
8.6
31
88.6
1
2.9
Houston
9
25.7
8
22.9
12
34.3
3
8.6
Detroit
9
25.7
11
31.4
7
20.0
1
2.9
61
-------
TABLE 6
1973 VEHICLES MEETING 1973 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1973 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
tt OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREd
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
%
NO
%
NO
%
NO.
%
«AMC
1
1
100.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
H" JICK
1
50.0
0
0.0
2
100. 0
0
0.0
CADIL AC
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
CAPRI
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
1
12.5
0
0.0
8
100.0
0
0.0
CHRYSLER
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
OATSUN
1
1
10 fl. 0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
OO'lGE
0
O.O
0
0.0
2
10 1.0
0
0.0
-ORD
7
0
0.0
0
0.0
7
100.0
0
0.0
MAZDA
1
0
0.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
MERCURY
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
OLDSMOBILE
4
2
2
100.0
1
50.0
2
100.0
1
50.0
PLYMOUTH
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
100.0
0
0.0
PONT I AC
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
TOYOTA
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
VOLKSWAGEN
2
1
50.0
0
0.0
1
50 .0
0
0.0
TOTALS
35
7
20.0
3
8.6
31
86. 6
1
2.9
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES»INC.
19l)0 0 E. COLFAX» AURORA* COLO. 80011
62
-------
TABLE 6
1973 VEHICLES MEETING 1973 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HOUSTON
1973 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
_ — - —
•**
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
# OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
%
NO
%
NO
*
NO.
%
AMC
1
0
o.n
0
0.0
1
10 i.O
0
0.0
BUICK
0
0 . 0
1
50. 0
0
0.0
0
0.0
CAOILuAC
1
1
J (P.O
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
CAPRI
1
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
b
62.5
4
50.0
4
50.0
2
25.0
CHRYSLER
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
OATSUN
1
n
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
DOMGE
C
0.0
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
FORD
7
1
14.3
0
0.0
2
28.6
0
0.0
MAZDA
1
0
0.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
MERCURY
1
0
0.0
1
l o n. o
0
0.0
0
0.0
0LDSM09ILE
2
1
50.0
1
50.0
1
50.0
1
50. 0
PLYMOUTH
?
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
PONT I AC
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOYOTA
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
VOLKSWAGEN
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
TOTALS
35
9
25. 7
8
2?.9
12
34.3
3
8.6
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORA TORIES>INC.
19(i0i! E. COLFAX» AiJROHA> COLO. 80011
63
-------
TABLE 6
1973 VEHICLES MEETING 1973 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DETROIT
1973 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
n of
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
%
NO
%
NO
%
NO.
%
AMC
1
1
1 oo.n
1
100. 0
0
0.0
0
0.0
B1JICK
1
50.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
CADILLAC
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
CAPRI
1
0
0.0
1
lon.o
0
0.0
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
4
50.0
3
37.5
4
50.0
1
12.5
CHRYSLER
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
DATSUN
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
DODGE
1
50.0
1
50.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
FORD
7
0
0.0
1
14.3
2
28.6
0
0.0
MAZDA
1
0
o.n
1
100.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
MERCURY
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
OLDSMOBILE
2
0
0.0
2
100.0
n
0.0
0
0.0
PLYMOUTH
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
n.o
0
0.0
PONTIAC
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOYOTA
1
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
VOLKSWAGEN
2
1
50.0
1
U1
o
•
o
1
0
o
•
o
1
0
0.0
TOTALS
^5
9
25.7
11
31.4
7
20.0
1
2.9
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES' INC.
19^00 E. COLFAX> AURORA» COLO. 80011
64
-------
3.1.1.4 1074 Vehicles Meeting 1^74 federal Standards - Data relative to the
1074 model-year vehicles meeting 1°74 Federal emission standards are
shown in Table 7. The three paces comprising Tabic 7 follow this paragraph
Data are summarized as follows:
City 1974 Vehicles Meeting 1974 Standards
11C
CO
:iox
All
Three
(No.) CO
(Ho.
) (?)
(No.)
CO
(Ho.)
CO
Denver
©
•
o
o
0
0.0
n
90.0
0
0.0
Houston
4 40.0
5
50.0
5
50.0
3
30.0
Detroit
4 40.0
5
50.0
5
50.0
20.0
-------
TABLE 7
1974 VEHICLES MEETING 1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DENVER
1974 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
rt OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
%
NO
*
NO.
%
NO.
%
BUICK
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
100.0
0
0.0
DODGE
I
0
O.U
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
FORD
2
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
100.0
0
0.0
OLDSMOBILE
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
ion. o
0
0.0
PLYMOUTH
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
PONT IAC
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
o.g
VOLKSWAGEN
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
o.u
TOTALS
10
0
0.0
0
O.'O
9
90.0
0
0.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES' INC.
19900 E. COLFAX» AURORA* COLO. 80011
66
-------
TABLE 7
1974 VEHICLES MEETING 1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
HOUSTON
1974 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
U OF
<3.4
GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
MAKE
VEH.
NO.
515
NO
%
NO
%
NO.
%
BUICK
1
0
0.0
1
100.0
1
lon.o
0
0.0
CHEVROLET
2
1
50. 0
1
50.0
2
10'J.O
1
50.0
DODGE
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
FORD
2
1
50.0
1
50.0
1
50.0
1
50.0
OLDSMOBILE
1
1
100.0
1
10 0.0
1
100.0
1
10 C . 0
PLYMOUTH
1
0
0.0
0
o.n
0
0.0
0
0.0
PONTI AC
1
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
VOLKSWAGEN
1
1
101.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTALS
10
4
40.0
5
50.n
5
50 .n
3
30.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES*INC.
19-J01 E. COLFAX» AURORA t COLO. 80011
67
-------
TABLE 7
1971+ VEHICLES MEETING 1974 FEDERAL STANDARDS
DETROIT
1974 FEDERAL
TEST
PROCEDURE
HC
CO
NOX
VEHICLE
n of
<3.4 GM/MI
<39
GM/MI
<3.0
GM/MI
ALL
THREE
MAKE
VEH.
NO. %
NO.
%
NO
%
NO.
%
BUICK
1
1 10 0.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
1
100.0
CHEVROLET
2
2 100.0
2
100.0
1
50. 0
1
50.0
OODGE
1
0 o.o
0
0.0
1
100.0
0
0.0
FORD
2
•
O
o
0
0.0
0
o
•
o
0
0.0
OLDSMOBILE
1
l ton.o
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
o.n
PLYMOUTH
I
O
•
o
o
0
0.0
1
ion. j
n
o. n
PONT IAC
1
0 o.n
1
100.0
0
0.0
0
o.n
VOLKSWAGEN
1
0 0.0
0
0.0
1
10P.0
0
0. 'J
TOTALS
10
4 40.n
5
50.0
5
50.0
2
20.0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES' INC.
1990 U E. COLFAX * AURORA r COLO. 80013
68
-------
3.1.2 tlodal Emissions
Mean modal emissions and fuel economy data developed by the SDS and
steady state test procedures are presented in the nine par*es of tables
which follow. Data from the 1^72, 1073 and 1974 model-year vehicles
tested at each site are shown respectively in Tables 8, 9, and IP.
Data indicate nenerallv higher TIC, CO, C02 and 110 emissions
during the acceleration modes.
Steady state data indicate a general lowering of 1IC and CO emissions
on a grams/mile basis as speeds are increased. NOx emissions tend
to increase with increasing speed, ^rom the points measured, best fuel
economy appears at about 30 miles per hour.
69
-------
TABLE 8
SUM ARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY 1972 MODEL-rEAR VEHICLES IN DENVER
MODE FROM-TO DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO. (MPH) (MILES) (SEC) HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
0U-30
0.0602
12
6.89
130.8
502.8
3.12
12.15
2
30-00
0.0741
16
6.12
116.1
513. 5
2.57
12.41
3
00-15
0.0201
8
9.77
185.6'
810.7
2.87
7.83
4
15-30
0.0705
1
4. 45
89.2
489.2
3.30
13.79
5
30-45
0.1360
13
3.67
76.U
423.3
4.35
16.01
6
45-30
0.1268
12
3.35
58.4
349.2
3. 06
19.65
7
30-60
0.2163
17
5.16
143.6
412.6
3.22
13.56
8
60-45
0.1716
12
4.18
97.6
365.4
3.56
16. 68
9
45-60
0.2043
14
4.42
103.2
387.5
4.53
15. 74
10
60-15
0.3367
30
4.40
74.6
379.8
4.03
17.37
1 I
15-60
0.3136
26
6.15
196.2
430.3
2.97
1 ' .71
12
60-00
0.1973
21
5.79
11 7.2
4-47.9
4.54
13.65
13
00-60
0.3513
32
7.26
203. o
479.2
3. 1~>
10.80
14
60-30
0.29^4
23
4. 49
91.0
337.0
3.28
17.96
15
30-15
0.0579
9
6.33
87.1
355.7
1.90
17.31
16
15-0.,
0.0173
8
14.7/
222.8
729.0
2.37
7. 8rt
17
nn-u5
0.1759
2?
6.17
151.5
414.8
3.30
13.20
18
45-1 5
0.1392
16
4.95
110.9
393.4
2. 83
15.21
19
15-45
0.1528
18
5.67
126.3
382.0
2.6^
14.83
20
45-0 1
0.1304
19
6.12
132.8
456.8
3.02
12.96
21
nn-60
0.2654
25
7.53
228.9
451.7
2.77
10.63
2-
60-00
0.2634
28
6.49
137.5
425.5
3. 34
13.40
23
00-30
0.0737
15
8.75
160.5
618.6
4.24
9.88
24
30-60
0.3134
25
5.07
137.3
403.2
3.61
13.98
25
60-30
0.2362
19
4.57
92.7
349. y
3.23
17.40
26
30-n
0.0444
10
9.33
132.6
519.3
2. 73
11.72
27
nn-60
0.40H9
38
6. 41
183.5
445. 6
3. fc>4
11 .77
28
60-rvi
0.3293
35
5.60
103.5
384.6
3.21
15. 71
29
00-30
0.0806
18
8.11
150.9
570.4
3.56
10.65
30
30-60
0.259^
21
5.64
171.0
410.8
3.15
12.73
31
60-30
0.1813
14
4.89
115.2
368.5
3.16
15. 71
32
30-0 0
0.0592
13
10.33
148. ti
526. o
2.94
11.19
TOTAL CALCULATED RFSULTS
4.51
101.8
401.1
3.81
1 5.42
BAG
RESULTS
5.55
142.3
436.0
3.44
13.1 L
33
IDLE
0.84
19.0
70.1
0.08
H6.53
34
5 MPH
STEADY 1
STATE
8.38
200.8
874.9
0.90
7.29
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
4.04
101.9
580. 3
0.60
11 .78
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.80
69.3
431.8
0 . 70
16. 15
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.08
34.0
317.8
1.91
23.49
38
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.41
40.0
318.8
4.22
2?.80
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.63
52.1
304.0
6.08
19.54
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MIN'JTF FOR I OLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MCLES PER GAL1 ON (MINUTES PEitf GAL! ON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS' UME A i:i.85 C W-tJN' HYDROGEN RATIO
70
-------
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY 1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MODE
NO.
FROM-TO
(MPH)
DISTANCE
(MILES)
TIME
(SEC)
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
1
0H-30
0.0602
12
5.83
80.9
689.1
7.27
10.63
2
30-01)
0.0741
16
5.13
62.7
671.2
4.70
1 1.29
3
00-15
0.0201
8
8.8 '•
110.0
969.0
5.3S
7.59
4
15-30
0.0705
11
3.84
50. 7
602.5
5.71
12.78
5
30-45
0.1360
13
2.84
28.1
534.3
8.16
15.11
6
45-30
0.1268
12
2.48
22.6
458.3
5.61
17.69
7
30-60
0.2163
17
3.26
60.6
526.9
7.68
14.03
8
60-45
0.1716
12
3.10
62.6
501.4
6.^+0
14.56
9
45-60
0.2043
14
3.09
40.5
510.1
9.10
15.21
10
60-15
0.3367
30
3.18
34.3
509.9
6.83
15.46
1 i
15-60
0.3136
26
3.94
81.9
579.2
8.25
12.32
12
60-00
0.1973
21
4.01
58.0
659.7
8.27
11.62
13
0H-60
0.3313
32
4.35
79,4
650.6
10.0!)
11 .25
14
60-30
0.2994
23
3.07
42.1
484.2
6.41
15.85
15
30-15
0.0579
9
5.02
52.4
517.5
3. 74
14.41
16
15-00
0.0173
8
1 1 .91
153.3
1044.4
4.30
6.71
17
0 1-45
0.1759
2 ->
3.96
69.6
540.2
7.64
13.40
18
45-15
0.1392
lb
3.41
41. 7
573.6
5.90
13.66
1Q
15-45
0.1528
18
3.68
57.7
493.5
6.36
14.90
20
45-0'l
0.1304
19
4.16
54.2
675. 7
6.62
11 .47
21
Od-60
0.2654
25
4.29
115.3
580.3
6.84
1 i .45
2.-:
60-00
0.2634
28
4.39
76.7
594.9
6.74
12.17
23
00-30
0.0 73 7
15
6.55
93.7
747.0
7.89
9.70
24
30-60
0.3134
25
3.04
47.1
537.0
8.49
14.30
25
60-30
0.2362
18
2.93
41.2
480.8
6.35
16.OJ
26
30-00
0 .044U
10
7.21
76.5
705.2
5.23
10.46
27
00-60
0.40 09
38
3.7 7
68.4
609. 7
9.51
12.17
28
60-00
0.3293
35
3.84
43.2
507.5
6.12
15.11
29
0«i-30
0.08ti6
18
6.07
85.0
707.]
7.26
10.32
30
30-60
0.2599
21
3.12
58. 5
549.0
8.28
13.64
31
60-30
0.1813
14
3.13
53.8
515.0
6.58
14,56
32
30-00
0.0592
13
7.22
83.1
696.1
b. 09
10.45
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
3.21
48.0
538.7
6.96
14.2?
HAG
RESULTS
3.59
62.8
592.7
7.05
12.63
3 3
IDLE
1.05
20.2
120.0
0 .92
57.20
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
8.36
19^.8
12 ? 9 « 0
1.6m
5.6
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
7.66
94.5
766.5
1.17
9.45
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
3.69
5~). 8
538.4
0.68
13.92
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.80
19.8
435.9
2.19
18.77
38
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.63
21.9
404.4
5.63
19.9Q
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.95
20.8
473.9
8.71
17.31
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHONI HYDROGEN RATIO
71
-------
TABLE 8
SUMMARY1 OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY 1972 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN DETROIT
MODE FROM-TO DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO.
(MPH)
(MILES)
(SEC)
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
00-30
0.0602
12
5.38
78.6
479.4
3.63
14.32
2
30-0 (J
0.0741
16
5.44
67.2
629.0
3.96
11.80
3
00-15
0.0201
8
9.67
125.8
905.5
4.19
7.83
4
15-30
0.0705
11
4.01
51. 7
535.2
3.83
14.11
5
30-15
0.1360
13
2.83
30.8
474.3
5.54
16.69
6
45-30
0.1268
12
2. 76
28. 3
435.1
4.66
18.17
7
30-60
0.2163
17
3.56
6b. 3
467.7
5.46
15.22
8
60-45
0.1716
12
3.24
60.6
463.9
5.40
15.58
9
45-60
0.2043
14
3.40
43.5
4 70.1
6. 73
16.16
10
60-15
0.3367
30
3.80
40.8
49V.6
6.46
15.41
11
15-60
0.3136
26
4.17
75.3
525.3
6.41
13.51
12
60-00
0.1973
21
4.80
63.4
621.5
7.55
12.05
13
00-60
0.3313
32
5.17
86.6
59'!.7
7. 60
11.80
14
60-30
0.29 )4
23
3.61
49.6
461.6
5. 52
16.11
15
30-15
0.0579
9
6.15
58.2
b0 5. 6
3.58
14.40
lb
15-00
0.0173
8
14.38
158.1
1045.2
4.82
6.63
17
00-45
0.1759
22
4.84
74.5
518.5
5. 78
13.63
18
45-15
0.1392
16
4.00
51.9
518.7
5.21
14.46
19
15-45
0.1528
18
4.30
59.7
501.6
5.39
14.57
20
45-00
0.1304
19
5.04
64.6
610.6
5. 93
12.19
21
00-60
0.2654
25
5.63
137.2
562.9
5.27
11.15
2?
60-00
0.2634
28
5.41
89.4
573.3
5.95
12.14
23
00-30
0.0737
15
8. 70
114.3
752.8
6.97
9.24
24
30-60
0.3134
25
3 . 4ti
51.6
48'+. 8
6. 53
15. 38
25
60-30
0.2362
18
3.38
45.8
463.3
6. Oh
16.26
26
30-00
0. U44U
10
8.70
79.7
725.0
5. 53
10.11
27
00-60
0.4009
38
4.61
78.9
5' '0.9
7.21
12.87
28
60-0"
0.3293
35
4.65
5'">. 5
526.4-
6. 14
14. 12
29
0.J-30
0.0886
1 8
7.96
97.7
702.3
6.63
10.07
30
30-60
0.259'-'
21
3. h'o
61.4
493.5
6.51
14.75
31
60-30
0.1813
14
3.61
57.5
472.4
5.94
15.46
32
30-0 0
0.0592
13
8.39
94.6
731.4
5.69
9.77
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
3.62
50.8
502.7
5.88
14.94
BAG
RESULTS
4,ua
68.5
542.9
5.97
13.36
3 \
IDLE
0.93
16.6
77.6
0.13
83.21
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
10.82
183.7
1006.1
1. 40
6.68
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
4.45
7/. 3
68 ». 7
0.73
10.77
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
3.05
43.0
533.6
0. 83
14.53
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.89
1O.0
385.4
2. 13
21.30
36
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.01
20.3
406.3
4,93
19.97
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.07
2>.6
451-). 0
8.03
17.85
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALuON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS UME A i:i.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
72
-------
FABLE 9
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY-FIVE 1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN DENVER
MODE
FROM-TO
DISTANCE TIME
FUEL
NO.
(MPH)
(MILES)
(SEC)
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
o; i - 3 n
0.0602
12
7.11
164.8
665.2
3.13
9.38
2
30-0H
0.0741
t6
4.41
88. 4
391.0
1.04
16.32
3
On-15
0.0201
8
7.71
169.9
907.3
2.16
7.40
4
15-30
0.0705
1 I
3.95
89.1
576.5
2.68
12.17
5
30-45
0.1360
13
3.47
78.5
483.6
3.59
14.36
6
45-30
0.1268
12
2.75
42.5
258.1
0 . 99
26.61
7
30-60
0.2163
17
5.61
206.4
547.5
3. 03
9.98
8
60-45
0.1716
12
3.78
64. 7
288.2
1 .44
2^.08
9
45-60
0.2043
14
4 .4"
130.6
480. 7
3.50
12.68
in
60-15
0.3367
30
3.27
52.3
310.0
1.63
2^.05
1 1
1 5-60
0.3136
26
6.47
226.1
553. 1
3.12
9.55
12
60-0''>
0.1973
21
4.47
76.8
348.7
1.79
18.35
13
0,1-60
0.3M3
32
7.50
216.5
587.0
3.49
9.33
1 4
60-30
0.2994
23
3.36
56.3
284.2
1.44
23.15
15
30-15
0.0579
9
3.81
58.8
315.1
0.81
21.15
16
15—Oil
0.0173
8
9.22
152.8
733.5
1.08
8.85
17
00-45
0.1759
22
6.81
188. 3
580.6
3.26
9.84
18
45-15
0.1392
16
3.30
70.6
317.2
1.10
20.24
] 9
1 5-45
0.1528
18
6.42
146.6
517.7
2. 74
11.5)
20
45-00
0.1304
19
4.05
81.8
367.9
1.23
17.43
21
00-60
0.2654
25
8.80
271.0
602.1
3.25
8.41
21
b 0 — 01
0.2634
28
4.29
76.8
332.6
1.54
19.01
23
on-3n
0.0 737
15
7.13
148.8
732.0
3.42
8.98
24
30-60
0. 5134
25
5.53
147.4
488.9
3. 12
12.03
25
60-30
0.2362
18
3.41
57.9
276.8
1. 43
23.44
2b
30-0 0
0 .0444
10
5.41
88.7
442.0
1.08
14.83
27
00-60
0.4009
38
6.52
188.0
539.0
3.18
10.38
28
60-0"
0.3293
35
3.84
65.5
311.3
1.38
20.82
2Q
O'J-30
0.0886
18
6.9
142.7
68o. 6
2.92
9.49
30
30-60
0.259°
21
6. 13
197.2
516.8
2.96
10.49
31
60-30
0.1813
14
3.70
69.7
283.0
1 .46
21 .95
32
30-0 0
0.0592
13
5.78
97.0
422.9
1.12
14.95
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
4.04
95.8
425.9
2.45
15.06
HAG
RESULTS
4.49
119.0
453.9
2.23
13.55
3 1
IDLE
0.79
15.2
70.8
0.07
91.37
34
5 MPH
STEADY '
STATE
7.97
156.0
836.2
0.72
8.02
35
10 MPH
STEADY 1
STATE
3.73
78.6
542.6
0.59
13.09
36
15 MPH
STEADY 1
STATE
2.43
55. 4
426.9
0.52
17.02
37
30 MPH
STEADY '
STATE
1.89
34.8
329.-'
1.02
22.72
38
45 MPH
STEADY !
STATE
1.86
32.7
354.6
2.40
21.55
39
60 MPH
STEADY !
STATE
2.30
47.1
394.7
3.64
18.64
EMIS ION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:].85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
TABLE 9
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY-FIVE 1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MODE FROM-TO DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO. (MPH) (MILES) (SEC) HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
00-30
0.0602
12
6.19
73.4
671.8
4.85
11.00
2
30-00
0.0741
16
6.07
67.0
702.5
3.10
10.73
3
00-15
0.0201
a
9.91
105.2
981.U
2.7 /
7.54
4
15-30
0.0705
1 i
4.17
46.9
594.3
3.41
13. 03
5
30-45
0.1360
13
2. 72
28.2
520.6
5.D l
15.48
6
45-30
0.1268
12
. 2.60
25.0
476.7
3.41
16.93
7
30-60
0.2163
17
3.05
64.1
508.7
5.' >4
14.34
8
60-45
0.1716
12
3.15
56.3
524.3
4. 32
14.25
9
45-60
0.2043
14
3.01
44.9
496.5
6.02
15.39
10
60-15
0.3367
30
2.91
32.2
539.1
4.65
14.82
1 1
15-60
0.3136
26
3.51
82.7
5h 1. 1
D.98
L2.82
12
60-00
0.1973
21
3. 72
56.2
680.0
5.8~i
1 i .38
13
00-60
0.3313
32
4.16
83.6
626.8
7.20
1 .51
60-30
0.2994
23
2.65
39.8
504.8
4.29
10.41
15
30-15
0.0579
9
4.98
48.0
526. 1
2.40
14.38
16
15-00
0.0173
8
12.10
133.7
1152.6
3.02
6.3 •<
17
00-45
0.1759
22
3.71
63. 0
544.2
5.41
13. ^ K
18
45-15
0.1392
16
3.19
42.8
563.7
^.73
1 >. 1 5
19
15-4b
0.1528
18
3.39
52.5
531.4
4.b7
14.21
20
45-0 0
0.1304
19
4.10
56.6
691.5
4,19
1 :. 1 9
21
00-60
0.2654
25
4.01
116.0
547.1
5. 1".
1 ' .96
2'->
60-00
0.2634
28
3.84
73.3
605.4
4.24
12. ] 1
23
00-30
0.0737
15
6.26
84.6
719.0
5. 12
10.18
24
30-60
0.3134
25
2.73
48.3
512.6
5.82
14.86
25
60-30
0.2362
18
2.43
36.0
492.7
4.41
1 5. 94
26
30-00
0.044 4
10
6.61
71.1
723.5
3.46
10.37
27
00-60
0 . 4 G 'J 9
38
3.40
70.2
56o. 7
6.34
12.90
28
60-00
0.3293
35
3.09
39.5
520.5
4.24
14.ye
29
00-30
0.0886
18
5.55
73. 7
6h9. 2
4.81
1] . 06
30
30-60
0.259
21
2.79
54.9
515.6
6. 0 • i
14. 53
31
60-30
0.1813
14
2.63
50.0
531 .0
4.41
14.36
32
30-00
0.0592
13
6.64
80.0
729.8
3.96
10.13
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
2.82
45.3
529.0
4.58
14.57
BAG
RESULTS
3.20
62.0
587.1
4.82
12.78
33
IDLE
1.15
18.9
lib. 7
0.24
59.15
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
7.66
177.7
125"). 0
1.3 8
5.69
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
4.20
84.7
784.6
0.83
9.53
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.14
49.3
54". 6
0.48
14.12
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.53
18.8
4 11.4
1.48
19.91
38
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.25
15.7
405.7
3.04
20.43
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.30
16.3
450.4
5.63
18.48
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GAL! ON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A i:i.85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
74
-------
TABLE 9
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
THIRTY-FIVE 1973 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN DETROIT
MODE FROM-T0 DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO. (MPH) (MILES) (SEC) HC CO C02 NOX ECON
I
0'>-30
0.0602
12
4.28
64.3
487.1
3.59
14.75
2
30-Ofl
0.0741
16
3.97
57. 1
656.9
3.45
11.69
3
0,o-15
0.0201
8
6.96
106.0
947.7
3.8.
7.81
4
15-30
0.0705
11
2.89
41.6
530.3
3.21
14.67
5
30-45
0.1360
13
1.95
22.9
466.2
4.68
17.46
6
45-30
0.1268
12
1.85
16.2
442.8
3.47
18.72
7
30-60
0.2163
17
2.64
59. 5
483.0
5.08
15.17
8
60-45
0.1716
12
2.28
43. 9
483.9
4.65
15.85
9
45-60
0.2043
14
2.35
33.8
479.1
5.84
16.45
10
60-15
U.3^67
30
2.47
24. 7
523.8
5.30
1 5. 56
1:
15-60
0.3136
26
3.15
72.2
531.7
6.00
13.55
12
60-D0
0.1973
21
3.25
43. 1
646.2
6.61
12.26
13
0. -60
0.3313
32
3.52
74.6
616.6
7.02
1 L.91
14
60-30
0.29'->4
23
2.3 *
3 3.1
484.6
4.81
16.31
15
30-15
0.0579
9
3.90
37.0
539.4
3.06
14.56
16
l5-0n
0.0173
8
9.02
114.8
1084.2
3.87
6.86
17
T -45
0.1759
22
3.20
62.9
523.6
5.08
14.03
18
45-15
0.1392
16
2.67
34.4
546.3
4.15
14.58
19
15-45
0.1528
18
2.92
47.8
497.2
4.81
15.26
20
45-Od
0.1304
19
3.39
42. 0
644 .2
4.87
12.31
21
0f>-60
0.2654
25
3.82
1-9.7
570.9
5.18
11 .51
2>
tsn-;ir.
0.2634
28
3.76
63.4
597.9
4.94
12.51
23
0' i-30
0.0737
15
5.85
81.2
776.6
5.90
9.62
24
30-60
0.3134
25
2.32
38. 1
494.9
5.9->
15.79
25
60-30
0.2362
18
2.18
27.0
478.7
4.84
16.81
26
30-0 »
0.044 >-
10
5.67
5S.2
750.4
4.40
10.38
27
0)-b0
0.40 09
38
2.9'»
62.6
569.8
6.60
13.10
28
o0-n0
0.3293
3d
2.94
32. 4
546.9
5.04
14.62
29
o ;-30
0.0886
18
4,97
69.1
717.0
5.45
10.55
30
30-60
0.2599
21
2.43
49.3
513.6
6.10
14.82
31
60-30
0.1813
14
2.30
37.4
503.8
4.75
15.57
32
30-f'1
0.0592
13
5.71
65.9
774.4
4,65
9.91
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
2.4 J
36.9
519.0
5.20
15.18
1
1AG RESULTS
2.95
52.4
560. 1
5.21
13.62
3 }
IDLE
0.69
12.2
85.5
0.13
83.06
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
7.02
137.9
1089.5
1.09
6.68
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.86
62. 7
700.7
0.61
10.98
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.85
36.0
530.3
0.61
14.97
37
30 MPH
STEADY !
STATE
1.41
L4.1
396.5
1.95
20.98
38
45 MPH
STEADY !
STATE
1.25
7.3
423.4
4.15
20.23
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.3 5
LO. 1
468.0
7.33
18. 18
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES DER GALLON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A I:1.85 CARBON5HYDROGEN RATIO
75
-------
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
TEN 1971 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN DENVER
MODE FROM-TO DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO.
(MPH)
(MILES)
(SEC)
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
00-30
0.0602
12
6.36
132.6
549.5
1.87
11 .41
2
30-0 f1
0.0741
16
6. 09
1 33.7
566. 9
1.11
11.14
3
nu-15
0.0201
8
9. 38
163.7
911.2
1.45
7.39
4
J 5-30
0.0705
11
4.37
1 04.6
508.3
1.44
12.93
5
30-45
0.1360
13
3.56
89.0
140.4
2.29
15.00
6
45-30
0.1268
12
2.89
63.1
382.1
1.41
18.07
7
30-60
0.2163
17
1.37
146.5
153.1
2.56
12.73
8
60-45
0.1716
12
3.58
98.5
121.9
1.89
15.09
9
45-60
0.2043
11
1.00
109.5
136.7
2.65
14.28
l n
60-15
0.3 ^67
30
1.08
72.3
142.5
2.03
15.59
i;
15-60
0.3136
26
5.11
193.1
170.1
2.56
11.22
12
60-0' i
0.1973
21
5.27
116.8
571.4
2.33
11.46
13
00-60
0.3 313
32
6.21
201.2
526.0
2.74
10.30
14
60-30
0.29^4
23
3.58
92.5
404.2
1.66
15.82
15
30-15
0.0579
9
5.68
81.7
427.4
0.97
15.47
16
15-0'.
0.0173
8
12.59
178.2
961.2
1.46
6.93
17
00-45
0.1759
2 V
5.20
141.0
451.9
2.13
12.81
18
4-5-15
0.1392
16
1.08
114.7
465.1
1.35
13.48
19
15-45
0.1528
18
1.67
125.4
120.1
1. 78
14.04
20
45-OT
0.1304
19
1.83
128.3
513.8
1.45
11.67
21
00-60
0.2654
25
6.15
230.4
194.5
2.05
10.13
2-'
60-00
0.2634
28
1.92
129.3
492.9
1.75
12.47
?3
00-30
0.0737
15
7.18
146.5
676.5
2.05
9.55
24
30-60
0.3134
25
1.10
140.3
431.7
2.39
13.34
25
60-30
0.2362
18
3.56
91.5
105.3
1.69
15.84
26
30-0 J
0.044';
10
7.56
120.3
620.1
1.51
10.65
27
00-60
0.4009
38
1.68
160.8
191.9
2.48
1J .69
29
60-0
0.3293
35
1.07
91.7
150 .3
1.85
14.61
29
0— 30
0.0886
18
6.80
188.4
613.1
1.67
9.24
30
30-60
0.259W
21
1 . 6"
167.2
113.0
2.19
12.85
31
60-30
0.1813
14
1.01
111.0
119.1
1.68
14.52
32
30-0.)
0.0592
13
7. 6w
131.6
595.1
1.41
10.74
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
3.80
97.9
161.6
2.27
14.15
HAG
RESULTS
4.63
138.7
181.0
1. 9U
12.44
3
IDLE
1.00
11.1
86.8
0.12
77.82
54
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
10.16
150.0
1079.1
0.78
6.59
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
4. 48
79.3
581.8
0.60
12.27
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.55
59.1
170. 9
0.46
15.52
37
30 MPH
.STEADY STATE
1.87
32.6
360.7
1. 18
21.24
38
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.92
33.6
390.9
2.28
19.73
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
2. 18
17.7
139.5
3.59
17.02
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
rUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:I.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN R^TIO
76
-------
TABLE 10
SUM 1ARY OF MODAL EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
TEN 1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MODE FROM-TO DISTANCE TIME FUEL
NO. (MPH) (MILES) (SEC) HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
0 1-30
0.0602
12
6.01
80. 1
744. 7
4. 54
9.98
2
30-00
0.0741
16
6.28
66.1
746.2
2.49
10.20
3
0U-15
0.0201
8
9.76
122.4
1084.6
2.39
6.79
4
15-30
0.0705
1?
3.97
48.3
663. 5
2.82
11 .80
5
30-45
0.1360
13
2.76
26.4
584.2
4. 55
13. 9w
b
4 5-30
0.1268
12
2.67
17.3
517.6
2.85
16.04
7
30-60
0.2163
17
3.15
61.9
576.2
5.80
12.99
6
60-45
0.1716
12
2.68
50. 5
568.0
3.80
13.53
9
45-60
0.2043
14
3.05
47.8
557.4
5.84
13.82
1 n
60-15
0.3367
30
3.07
29.2
574.4
3.82
14.09
1 !
15-60
0.3136
26
3.70
94. 1
615.8
6.51
11.45
12
60-0 f
0.1973
21
3.91
48.9
731.1
5.15
10.82
15
0,1-60
0.3313
32
4.30
93.5
682.9
7.64
10.52
14
60-30
0.2994
23
3. 65
36. 7
539.0
3.78
14.59
15
30-15
0.0579
9
4.73
47.3
568.2
2.21
13.50
16
15-00
0.0173
8
11.39
155.3
1161.8
2. 75
6.15
17
00-45
0.1759
22
3.85
76.8
601.9
5.45
12.08
18
45-15
0.1392
16
3.34
48.3
61] .8
3.03
12.71
19
15-45
0.1528
18
3.48
62.5
562.1
4. 75
13.22
20
45-0r>
0.1304
19
4.47
50.2
714.6
3.52
10.99
21
00-60
0.2654
25
3.96
125.3
597.9
5. 76
10.9 )
2.'
60-0'i
0.2634
28
4.09
65.4
666. 8
4.05
11.34
23
0 0-30
0.0737
15
6.39
90.3
788.8
4.94
9.33
24
30-6(1
0.3134
25
2.93
60.4
561.8
6.08
13.33
25
60-30
0.2362
18
2.66
38.8
542.2
3.91
14.51
26
30-00
0.044U
10
7.10
75.0
793.2
3.11
9.51
27
00-60
0.4009
38
3.60
81.0
629.1
6.89
1 1 .56
28
60-01-
0.3293
35
3.50
36.7
581. 1
3.71
I3.6r>
29
0 M-30
0.0886
13
5.70
77.2
763.0
4.38
9.84
30
30-60
0.259':)
21
3. 04
71.5
56^ • 8
5.95
12.88
31
60-30
0.1813
14
2.82
54.8
578.8
3.85
13.17
32
30—U .
0.0592
13
6.48
69.4
789.4
3. 37
9. 6o
TOTAL CALCUI.
.ATED RESULTS
3.04
45.9
580.5
4.22
13.40
HAG
RESULTS
3.31
6»''. 8
646.5
4.62
1 1 .65
J i
IDLE
0.99
16.1
118.3
0.30
60.44
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
7.94
187.9
1250.8
0.92
5.65
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
3.54
100.5
792.1
0.80
9.23
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.09
60.7
62 2. 3
0.51
12.25
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.56
21.0
435. 9
1.42
18. 73
38
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.60
9. 7
467.3
2. 36
18.08
39
60 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.46
11.3
502.9
4.56
16.90
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GAL ON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS UME A 111.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
7
-------
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF
MODAL
EMISSIONS RESULTS ON
TEN
1974 MODEL-YEAR VEHICLES IN
DETROIT
MODE
FROM-TO
DISTANCE
TIME
FUEL
NO.
(MPH)
(MILES)
(SEC)
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
0' i—3 0
0.0602
12
4.43
71.4
560.5
3.26
12.92
2
30-0.)
0.0741
16
4.27
46.2
818.5
3.46
9.81
3
OiJ-1 b
0 .0201
8
7.11
81.9
1102.9
3.59
7.08
4
15-30
0.0705
11
2.89
34.5
628.5
2.63
12.83
5
30-45
0.1360
13
2.01
19.6
544.2
3.81
15.27
6
45-30
0.1268
12
1.89
12.4
547.6
2.72
15.49
7
30-60
0.2163
17
2.81
73.3
560.3
3.97
12.97
8
60-45
0.1716
12
2.30
47.0
579.2
3.59
13.4 -t
q
45-60
0.2043
14
2.67
48.7
5b9.8
4.28
13.7/
10
60-15
0.3367
30
2.79
28.7
642.0
3.97
12.75
11
15-60
0.3136
26
3.41
97.4
611.6
4.75
1 ' .4
0.04-w
10
5.63
46.5
91 7.7
4.24
8.80
27
00-60
0.40'19
38
3.05
68.5
654.6
5.21
11.50
28
60-Oc
0.3293
35
2.85
34.5
657.3
4.09
12.32
29
00-30
0.08U6
18
4.58
59.8
849.3
4.47
9.27
30
30-60
0.259
21
2.59
64.2
585.2
4.60
12.78
31
60-30
0.1813
14
2.51
47.9
586.0
3.59
13.26
32
30-00
0.0592
13
5.64
63.7
896.5
3.70
8. 75
TOTAL CALCULATED RESULTS
2.49
39.5
59°.5
4.03
13.26
BAG
RESULTS
2.96
55.9
641. 7
4.21
12.01
3;1.
IDLE
0.59
9.4
9M, 8
0.18
76.20
34
5 MPH
STEADY STATE
6.17
127.4
1233.7
1.70
6.11
35
10 MPH
STEADY STATE
2.51
53.6
715.4
0.73
10.99
36
15 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.73
36.1
589.6
0.78
13.62
37
30 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.28
10.4
435.3
1.67
19.47
3H
45 MPH
STEADY STATE
1.19
5.7
469.7
2.81
18.40
39
60 MPH
STEADY S
TATE
1.25
8.8
519.9
b. 15
16.51
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON(MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATION ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
78
-------
3.2 DISCUSSION OF EVAPORATIVE EMISSION TEST RESULTS.
Evaporative emission test results developed by the SHED technique and
cannlster procedure are presented In Table 11 (one page).
Data Indicate each of the 20 vehicles tested passed the 1973 Federal
Evaporative Emission Test Standard of 2 grams per test. Data further
indicate average evaporative emissions for the 20 vehicles to be 32.3
grams per test by the SHED technique and 0.39 grams per test by the
canister test procedure of the Federal Register.
79
-------
TABLE 11
Summary of Evaporative Emission Test
Results on Twenty 1^73 Model-Year Vehicles
Denver
SHED lrocedure (Enclosure method)
Diurnal Soak Time (minutes) 60
Enclosure temperature (°F) 73.1
Internal tenperature (°F) 84.1
HC (GT1S) 15.8
Hot Soak: Time (minutes) 60
Enclosure temperature (°F) 84.1
Internal temperature (°F) 97.1
HC (CMS) 16.5
TOTAL grams of evaporated HC emissions 32.3
Federal Test Procedure (Canister method)
Diurnal Soak: Time (minutes) 60
Soak temperature (°F) 79.9
Internal temperature (°F) 84.3
Hot Soak; Time (minutes) 60
Soak temperature (°F) 7°.8
Internal temperature (°F) 93.6
TOTAL j»rams of evaporated HC emissions 0.39
dumber of vehicles which met 1973 rederal Standards ( 2 gms) 20
Percent total tested 100%
Fuel Inspection Results (Average)
RV? 7.96
HC ratio 2.24
Fuel distillation temperatures (°F)
IBP 91.1
5% 134.4
lO? 149.3
15 7 162.0
20 7 173.3
30% 192.9
407 203.0
50? 221.4
90"! 332.1
EBP 335.2
80
-------
3.3 DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE REPLICATE TESTINfi
Replicate tests were performed on each of the twenty (20) 1973
model-year vehicles tested for evaporative emissions in Denver. These
resu.ts are summarized on the one pa^e Table 12 following this paragraph.
The object was to determine that the tests were repeatahle and, there-
fore, meaningful. The paired "T" test was applied to test for differences
between the first and second test. T scores indicate at a 95 percent
confidence level there was no discemable difference between IIP, C0t N0X
and fuel economy for the two tests.
81
-------
TABLE 12
Summary of Results of Replicate Testing
on Twenty 1973 Model-Year Vehicles
Denver
1972 Federal Test Procedure
No. of HC CO N0XC Fuel Econ.
Vehicles Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.
First
Test 20 4.64 1.06 81.0 36.? 2.07 1.04 14.16 4.87
Second
Test 20 4.59 1.89 77.7 34.3 2.11 1.06 14.42 4.63
Between
Tests
(Paired T) 20 -0.05 0.56 -3.3 10.3 -0.05 0.19 0.27 1.06
1975 rederal Test Procedure
No. of HC CO N0XC Fuel Econ.
Vehicles Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D. Mean S.D.
First
Test 20 4.22 1.91 71.2 35.9 2.03 0.96 15.00 5.10
Second
Test 20 4.16 1.83 68.5 33.0 2.07 0.98 15.32 4.95
Between
Tests
(Paired T) 20 -0.06 0.43 -2.6 10.4 0.04 0.21 0.32 1.13
82
-------
3.4 DISCUSSION OF AIR CONDITIONED VEHICLE EMISSION TEST RESULTS.
Data relative to the air conditioned vehicle emissions tasks are
presented in Table 13. The one page comprising Table 13 follows this
paragraph.
Data indicate HC, CO, CO2 and N0X emissions to be generally higher
from vehicles tested with the air conditioning system operating as opposed
to the additional 10 percent simulated A/C load of the Federal Register,
The following key is provided:
Test
A/C
A/C Simulation
1st (part of off
original test)
on
2nd
on
off
3rd
off
off
4th
off
on
83
-------
TABLE 13
SUMMARY OF AIR CONDITIONED VEHICLE TESTS
VS. MODEL YEAR IN HOUSTON AND DETROIT
HOT START TEST PROCEDURE
MODEL
tt OF
A/C
FUEL
YEAR
VEH.
SIM
A/C
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
1967
5
ON
OFF
7.11
124.5
570.6
3-82
11.25
OFF
ON
7.03
124.5
565.9
3.66
11.32
OFF
OFF
6.80
117-8
551.0
3.61
11.70
ON
OFF
6.70
116.2
554.1
3.63
11.69
1969
8
ON
OFF
4.28
70.9
647.9
6.40
11.35
OFF
ON
4 .60
86.0
666.4
6.60
10.77
OFF
OFF
4.16
72.8
633.2
6.18
11.52
ON
OFF
4.22
72.9
620.0
6.12
11.72
1971
9
ON
OFF
3.67
5^.7
663.1
6.75
11.50
OFF
ON
3.83
65.O
682.4
7.26
11.00
OFF
OFF
3-52
57.0
644.4
6.36
11.73
ON
OFF
3.39
55.4
652.5
6.5^
11.65
1972
4
ON
OFF
5.21
73-0
670.6
5.69
10.99
OFF
ON
6.18
95.8
684.0
6.04
10.35
OFF
OFF
5.41
82.5
630.5
4.91
11.34
ON
OFF
5.39
86.3
650.0
5-35
10.98
1973
9
ON
OFF
3.54
65.4
701. 4
4 .50
10.74
OFF
ON
3.72
66.5
732.8
5.27
10.32
OFF
OFF
3-35
59.4
697.8
4.42
10.91
ON
OFF
3.43
65.2
711.0
4.48
10.62
1974
5
ON
OFF
2.76
30.5
761.3
3.97
10.67
OFF
ON
3.35
41.7
810.7
4.89
9.88
OFF
OFF
2.61
30.0
741.2
3.^5
10.94
ON
OFF
2.46
26.3
7^6.9
3.52
10.95
TOTAL
40
ON
OFF
4.23
67.9
670.1
5-35
11.10
OFF
ON
4.53
77.1
692.2
5.81
10 .62
OFF
OFF
4 .10
67.5
653.2
5-03
11.35
ON
OFF
4 .06
68.1
658.4
5.13
11.26
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
-------
3.5 DISCUSSION OF EMISSIONS FROM LOADED VE1ITCLES AIJD VEHICLES TOUT NO
TRAILERS
Data relative to this task are presented in Table ]'~ comprising the
next 8 paj»es following this paragraph.
Data indicate generally higher J1C, CO, CO2 and rJr>x emissions from
loaded vehicles and vehicles tovring trailers for each model-year. A
significant increase in emissions is noted for vehicles towing trailers
(third test). As loads are increased, general decreases in fuel economy
can also he observed.
Steady state data indicate a general lowering in Hr and CO emissions
on a ^rans/mile basis as speeds are increased. IIOx emissions tend
to increase with increasing speed, ^rom the point-: measured, best fuel
economy appears at about 30 miles per hour.
85
-------
TABLE lit
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1967 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
20.
73
107
8
1)20
i)
2 88
13
5
10
81
135.
3
123
3
3
33
13
2
11,
.49
121
0
431
2
2.
70
13
5
2
18
00
128.
9
570,
,2
3.06
10
7
10.
,li)
171
9
563.
6
2
60
10.
.2
10
03
168,
.6
641.
¦ 3
3-
45
9
1
3
32
50
187.
5
761),
,5
3.05
7.
6
19.
,78
230.
1
803.
,2
3.
.23
7
2
20,
.60
230
9
861
1
3.
89
6,
,9
it
12
07
99
7
1)22
1
2.95
11.
1
6
80
97
4
148.
,8
3
50
11
2
7
26
108,
• 5
492,
.6
3
94
12,
• 9
5
6.
95
75
6
1)18,
,3
i). 26
15.
9
1).
,12
71.
,8
138.
,0
4.
,68
15
7
4
76
91.
.0
485.
3
1.
40
13
8
6
6
i)8
67
2
1)10.
,1
3 27
16.
6
3.
.98
63-
,1
127
3
3
89
16.
.5
5,
.29
98,
.3
528.
.9
1.
85
12.
,7
7
7
22
102.
.6
1)1)8.
,i)
D.6H
11.
0
5
61
Ill.
,9
172
6
4.
.97
13.
.2
6
40
111,
.6
555.
.0
5.
93
11
1
8
6
58
102
7
1)68
7
H.51
13
6
5
30
108
8
190
7
1.
• 98
13.
.1
7,
.17
188
5
659.
.0
6
36
9
1
9
6.
37
81)
9
1)58.
,0
5 39
It
5
5
51
91
5
175
2
1
87
13.
.8
6,
.75
135
2
601.
.8
7.
23
10
6
10
7
18
7D
i)
511
9
5 29
13.
6
6
22
87
9
518
1
5
34
13.
.1
8,
.58
213
3
701.
.1
6.
68
8
3
11
8
10
137.
• 7
1)80
5
1.13
12.
3
7
i)H
170
8
503
1
1
10
11
2
9
26
208
6
614
8
5.
31
9
1
12
8
76
115.
5
619
7
6.20
10.
,7
7,
.87
139.
,2
660
5
6
42
9
8
10,
¦ 51
278
3
872
0
7.
80
6,
,6
13
9
14
li)H
i)
566.
.6
5 20
10.
,8
8,
.90
179
2
601
8
1,
.78
9.
.7
10
90
254
1
722.
.6
5.
87
7,
.7
lit
6.
20
87
3
1)61),
,5
D 82
11
3
5
77
107
9
172
3
1,
• 55
13
4
7
75
190,
.1
636.
• 3
5
79
9
2
15
12
18
102
3
175
8
3.00
13
1
11
79
119
2
172
7
2
66
12.
.7
13
34
166
2
609
9
3.
87
9
7
16
33
21
2tl
8
897,
.1)
3.95
6
i)
29 .92
263.9
893
5
3.
.65
6
3
30
26
345 ¦
.6
1091
0
5.
06
5
1
17
9
8H
123,
.8
H67
9
3 8D
12 ,
.8
8
97
161
9
173
9
3-
.11
11
7
9
1)2
203
0
525
5
3
07
10.
,2
18
7.
1)2
96
6
1)90
5
3 69
13
3
6
75
130
0
191
8
3
38
12
3
7,
.81
191
7
590
2
3
83
9.
.7
19
8
11
100
0
i)i)7
.5
3 88
11
1
8
12
116,
.8
153,
.3
3,
.01
12,
.5
8
.1)2
181,
.7
508,
.8
2
97
10
8
20
9
01)
112,
.6
572
3
D.36
11.
,1
9,
• 31
161,
.6
818
3
3
41
8
0
9
58
216,
.0
701
2
1.
73
8
3
21
8,
91
161,
,i)
532,
,i)
1.72
10.9
8,
.96
202,
.5
562,
,0
1.72
9.
,8
9.15
249.0
628.
.2
1.
59
8,
¦ 5
22
8
53
127
3
575
3
5 08
11
1
8
55
160
8
582.
,7
5
01
10
3
10
42
289
9
739
3
5
47
7
2
23
16
77
168
9
678
8
6 OH
8,
¦ 9
16,
.86
176
6
713.
,2
5 ¦
• 93
8,
• 5
17
07
280
1
836.
.8
1.
97
6
7
21
5.
,i)8
83
9
1)56,
.0
i). 98
11
7
5
,H8
109
6
I83
2
1,
.58
13
2
6
82
174
7
532
3
3.
80
10.
,7
25
5.
00
68,
.8
1)69,
• 9
1) 91)
11
9
5,
• 59
84
0
476
8
4
89
14
2
6
.77
185,
.1
608
7
5.
78
9.
,6
26
15.
62
133.
.6
68D
n
H 51
9
i)
15
82
119
1
708
6
1,
.10
8
9
16
68
234
3
815
1
5
66
7
0
27
7
53
118
6
516
1
4.91
12,
.2
7,
.82
168
8
536
4
3
97
10
7
8
65
234,
.9
626
8
4
14
8
7
28
7.
75
88,
¦ 9
520,
.8
5.15
13.
,0
7
71
107
2
530
0
5,
.19
12
3
8
.25
206,
.2
679.
.0
5.
93
8
.6
29
15.
22
123
5
628
0
5.79
10
2
li),
.81
117
8
665
0
5,
.97
9
1
14
• 51
217
9
771
5
6
17
7.6
30
5
51
90
8
1169
D
H 75
11
1
5,
,60
111,
.7
478
5
3,
• 50
12.
• 3
6,
.08
176,
.8
553
8
4.
33
10,
.1
31
5.
27
93.2
186,
,1
4.55
13
7
5.
.15
116,
, 1
189 ¦
¦ 9
1,
.45
12,
.9-
7,
¦ 31
195
5
627
0
5-
62
9,
¦ 3
32
it
51
149
3
692
9
i) 1)8
9
1
15
16
195
1
679
0
5
81
8
6
15,
.81
255
1
811.
.5
5
55
6
8
CALC
6.
49
90
2
i)83,
,5
i).72
13
7
5
99
105
3
197
6
1
65
13
0
6,
.88
117,
• 9
617
6
6
32
10
2
BAG
7
00
109.
¦ 3
517
1
1.73
12
5
7,
• 55
139
6
537
1
1,
• 51
11
4
8
83
211,
• 3
660.
.8
5
28
8
7
IDLE
1.
89
21
2
71
3
0.13
80.
,2
2,
.02
19
6
75
7
0
13
78
7
1
90
21
7
77.
.2
0
17
75,
.7
5MPH
21
60
21) 6
6
856
2
0 97
6
7
23
89
237
7
898
1
1
22
*
6
22,
.63
237
2
816
0
0
89
6
9
10MPH
9.
96
151.
¦ 3
D98.
• 5
0.1)0
11,
.6
9,
• 30
130.
.8
503
3
0,
• 37
12
0
8
.06
130,
.6
527.
.6
0
13
11
7
15MPH
5.
51
108,
¦ 9
370
7
0 10
15.
.9
5
33
100
6
379
1
0
37
16
0
5.
.05
102
6
101
5
0
14
15,
• 3
30MPH
3
12
59.
.1)
312
5
1.35
19
9
2
66
60
6
342
8
1
82
19
9
3.
.50
67
7
391
8
2
08
17
1
15MPH
2
95
53.
¦ 5
1)00
8
3-85
18.
,0
2,
.87
51
3
115.
,2
1
11
17
6
3,
.38
55,
.7
534
1
7
12
14,
.0
60MPH
3.
07
51
9
t77
8
7 15
15
6
2
92
50
3
174
3
7.
,05
15
8
3,
• 36
56,
.2
671.
.2
11
87
11
5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE CPER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
-------
TABLE 11 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1968 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST-- - SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
11
03
9t
1
112
2
3
80
It,
,9
13
15
109
2
163
0
3
.77
13
1
12
90
130
2
135
1
1
15
13
.0
2
It
50
97
1
528
8
t
tl
12
2
It
69
93
3
581
5
5
10
11
5
17
18
119
9
628
9
6
15
10
2
3
23
62
161,
.7
790
3
6
07
7
9
25
31
167
7
838
9
5
28
7
5
30
91
197
u
882
1
6
88
6
9
10
90
71
3
t37
9
6
30
15
2
12
55
80
0
181
8
1
82
13
7
16
57
92
0
518
2
6
13
12
1
5
9
06
51
t
t28
5
6
69
16
5
10
29
59
9
151
5
6
15
15
3
13
02
76
7
509
2
8
13
13
.2
6
9
57
t5
1
t09
6
5
.81
17
t
10
10
15
5
120
6
5
71
16
9
11
93
70
3
512
8
7
81
13
2
7
13
21
110
5
t59
8
7
15
13
1
It
80
115
6
199
8
6
55
11
11
It
31
110
6
512
6
7
13
11
0
8
12
32
90
3
17 7
t
6
6t
13
5
13
02
93
8
166
0
6
56
13
6
15
32
203
0
635
0
9
01
8
9
9
11
9t
70
3
t67
t
7
t2
It
t
12
58
91
8
187
5
7
29
13
2
11
91
159
6
603
t
9
88
9
8
10
It ,
¦ 83
60
t
517
1
7
• 33
13
5
15
16
65
5
513
0
7
59
13
1
19
to
169
1
731
7
11
53
8
1
11
It
17
119
2
512
0
7
27
11
9
15
21
155
9
539
0
7
61
10
7
15
99
208
5
6lt
3
7
60
8
9
12
17
72
88
t
629
2
9
13
10
8
19
32
102
3
6U
9
9
16
10
3
IS
73
237
5
836.
2
12
28
7
0
13
16
50
131
6
573
t
8
98
10
7
18
it
159
3
612
1
9
61
9
3
17
92
237
0
771
8
10
It
7
1
ll
13
27
7t
8
17 3
5
6
66
It
0
13
98
81
1
175
3
6
85
13
7
13
95
151
5
681
1
10
35
9
2
15
19
25
75
7
509
7
11
6t
12
9
20
71
81
9
t86
1
1
70
13
0
25
99
128
3
658
2
7
39
9
1
16
13
57
19t
9
956
9
6
07
6
3
t6
82
197
7
951
6
6
20
6
3
61
21
283
8
1200
5
9
18
t
r.
17
13
58
81
2
133
9
7
07
It
6
It
15
108
9
196
1
6
81
12
1
20
77
168
1
571
5
7
11
9
8
18
13
38
66
1
493
0
5
75
13
9
13
96
71
3
508
6
6
32
13
3
17
71
125
8
611
8
8
29
10
3
19
13
86
86
6
t52
t
6
29
It
0
It
73
101
9
179
5
6
98
12
9
19
30
122
3
513
2
7
27
11
1
20
17
02
90
1
578
8
6
68
11
5
18
55
87
5
605
5
7
50
11
1
23
10
128
Q
726
7
9
97
8
8
21
16
11
157,
.7
526
5
7
08
10
8
16
37
191
t
566
6
6
77
9
6
16
77
219
0
622
9
7
36
8
7
22
18
66
116
2
583
3
7
23
10
8
19
51
128
8
601
1
7
18
10
2
18
91
196
2
831
0
11
L9
7
1
23
2t
85
137
5
701
2
8
59
8
9
27
01
116
8
738
8
9
'<3
8
t
31
16
2C7
0
917
9
n
62
6
6
21
13
.07
71
1
t58
8
7
69
It
1
13
23
90
1
181
5
7
91
13
3
It
C6
110
1
550
3
8
75
10
9
25
12
56
60
9
162
3
6
96
It
8
12
83
65
8
173
t
6
92
It
1
12
98
152
7
615
5
9
93
g
9
26
26
72
113
0
717
2
6
75
9
1
28
06
101
1
700
2
6
76
9
3
36
73
185
5
863
5
10
to
7
0
27
15
82
122
9
519
9
8
29
11
6
16
95
136
1
556
0
8
91
10
8
17
35
196
5
613
5
9
67
8
8
28
17
53
76
8
523
8
7
29
12
7
18
61
77
7
516
9
7
50
12
2
18
11
150
1
703
8
11
01
8
9
29
22
12
105
7
651
6
8
.29
10
0
2t
02
117
2
707
0
8
70
9
2
31
35
157
7
802
6
11
33
7
I
30
13
27
99
2
t77.
¦ 7
6
90
13
1
13
99
118
2
189
7
7
29
12
3
It
50
153
7
511
3
8
05
10
7
31
12
77
78,
,8
t73
3
6
71
13
9
13
87
90
5
501
5
6
88
12
9
It
01
173
9
620
1
8
97
9
5
32
27
12
131
8
693.
.2
6
83
9
0
28
98
121
0
715
3
6
86
8
8
36
50
211
1
851
7
9
57
6
8
CALC
12
89
71
7
19 3
0
6
89
13
7
13
18
80
8
501
9
6
95
13
2
It
82
121
7
610
1
9
86
10
1
BAG
It
86
96
0
521
5
6
72
12
3
15
57
110
1
563
2
6
93
11
3
18
76
177
1
673
5
8
25
8
8
IDLE
1
78
16
1
71
7
0
17
86
1
2
02
18
t
70
0
0
11
81
2
1
73
17
3
72
0
0
15
8J-
7
5MPH
28
89
211
3
938.
.6
1
62
6,
• 5
21
61
191
7
859
t
0
91
7
20
09
235,
, 1
912
8
1
tl
6
6
10MPH
11
61
lt3
0
5tt
1
0
39
11
0
12
29
127
6
531
9
0
55
11
5
11
88
151
3
552
2
0
62
10
7
15MPH
11
01
75
5
tt7
0
0
66
It
8
11
20
83
6
121
6
0
59
15
1
11
70
97
2
119
9
0
81
13
9
30MPH
8
86
37
1
359
2
2
35
19
9
8
50
31
3
350
8
2
39
20
6
9
31
33
7
133
8
t
95
17
2
15MPH
8
58
28
2
til
9
5
27
18
1
9
39
29
2
122
3
5
52
17
8
10
88
36
0
573
1
10
73
13
1
60MPH
9
31
28
1
t86
9
9
t8
15
8
9
11
29
3
178
5
9
22
16
0
9
95
52
8
690
5
It
63
11
0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, OaLO 80011
-------
TABLE 11) CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1969 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
5 98
91
1
130
7
5.
.52
15.0
6
1)3
96,
.6
1)07
9
5
46
15,
¦ 3
6
56
98
6
479
1
6,
.13
13
6
2
5 67
58.
,8
574.
,i)
6
9H
13.0
6
07
67,
.6
611
8
7
65
12
0
6.
21
73
5
682
8
10.
.04
10,
.8
3
9 82
153.
.1
710.
8
6
39
8.8
11.
,61
161,
.6
859,
.0
8,
.27
7.
.7
10
98
174
0
918
5
10,
.73
7.
.2
4
if 10
58.
,6
D61.
• 9
5.
• 98
15.7
i),
.15
61,
.2
D88
5
7,
.02
14
.8
4.
25
64
5
525,
¦ 5
8.
.75
13.
,9
5
2.75
27.
,1
1)39
2
8.
.1)8
18.1
2,
.97
27,
.0
1)58,
.6
9
46
17,
.4
3.
17
32
3
524
0
11.
.88
15,
.2
6
2.73
19
6
i)08
6
6
71
19 8
2
77
22,
.1
1)27
4
7
35
18,
• 9
3.
23
36
4
538.
.2
10.
• 76
14,
.7
7
3.18
ij 6
3
1)79
2
8
61
15.8
3.
,52
D9.
.1
1)98,
.0
9.
,22
15
1
4
26
79
4
574,
.7
10.
.13
12
4
8
3 .06
38,
• 9
1)57
2
8.
,08
16 8
3
29
52,
.8
1)76,
• 5
8
08
15
6
4.
27
97
4
650.
.4
11
72
10.
• 9
9
3 18
26
2
D68.
,1)
10.
¦ 73
17.1
3.
,56
3D,
.0
1)87,
.1
10,
,88
16,
.1
4
27
66
4
611
5
13
08
12,
.2
10
3.56
27
3
500
6
9
72
16.0
3.
,92
35,
• 5
513
9
9
76
15
2
4
91
73.
.3
719-
,7
14,
,49
10
4
11
3.91
62,
.2
512
6
10
29
ID.3
1).
,15
63,
.6
547
6
9,
• 99
13,
.4
5.
21
115
8
630.
,9
10
15
10
7
12
i) 1)9
D6
7
603.
,D
11
1)0
12 8
1)
92
5D
6
641
8
12
26
11
9
6.
14
108,
• 5
866,
• 9
16.
,15
8
4
13
i).68
60.
.2
590.
,2
12
91
12.7
5.
.11
6D
1
629
8
13
74
11
9
6
13
123,
.8
745.
,7
12.
4l
9
2
11
3-21
30.
• 7
1)1)1.
,9
8
97
17 7
3
D6
36
5
475
2
9
37
16
• 3
4.
54
76
6
586.
,5
12.
,50
12
3
15
6.12
t5
5
1)87
2
6
31
15.1)
6.
,i)D
53
5
503,
• 5
6
61
14
.6
7.
92
72,
.6
636.
,7
9
86
11
4
16
11).1)0
160,
.8
960.
.1
8,
• 33
7.1
15
31
1811
8
981
7
8,
.72
6,
.7
17
00
204.
,5
1171.
,2
12
44
5.
7
17
1) .25
59,
.8
1)70.
.9
9
15
15.3
D
91
72,
.8
511
7
10,
• 37
13
8
5.
23
89.
,2
558.
,5
10.
70
12
4
18
3 87
1)1
0
i)8i).
,6
8,
.11)
15 8
3
92
13
0
520
4
9
04
14,
.8
4
63
62
0
626
7
12
31
12.
.0
19
D.31
55,
.8
1)58
7
8,
.61
15.8
11.
• 55
58
• 3
488
.6
9,
• 59
14,
• 9
4
79
76
5
544.
.3
9.
,62
13
1
20
i) 91
i)D
1
587
6
9.
.58
13.2
5
13
50,
.6
613
• 3
10,
.63
12
5
5
93
81
1
755
9
13
68
9
8
21
i). 5^
89
9
551.
,9
9
77
12 5
5,
.31
121
0
582
6
8
75
11,
,2
6.
09
156
3
673
5
8
53
9
5
22
1) D6
56
7
565.
.7
9,
.12
13-3
5
i)i)
78
6
579
1
9
44
12
• 3
6.
30
126
7
767.
• 5
12
74
9.
,0
23
8.58
102,
.1)
706.
.7
11,
.1)9
9 9
8
50
119.
.0
748,
• 3
12
.70
9,
.2
10.
.06
148
3
881
2
15.
.52
7
7
21
3.06
30
5
1)70.
• 5
10
86
16 8
3,
• 39
35
1
502
0
11
64
15
.6
1)
02
67
5
576
7
11
36
12
8
25
2.96
25
6
1)52
8
9
21
17 7
3
21
30
0
467
5
9,
• 57
16
9
4.
.17
70
9
623
6
12
14
11,
.9
26
8.2H
62,
• 7
696.
,0
8
80
10 8
8,
.85
67
.0
717
• 5
10
• 23
10
4
9
76
99
3
895
7
15
01
8
2
27
3 96
D8,
.6
531
5
12
36
11) 2
i)
1)0
56,
• 3
571
1
12
• 51
13
2
5.
18
106
8
657
9
11
49
10
5
28
i) 09
39
2
516.
,D
9,
.66
15-0
i),
,D8
H3
8
533
• 9
9,
¦ 93
14 ,
.4
5
48
80
2
713,
.0
13.
.71
10
4
29
7.11
89
7
653
3
11
22
10 9
8
57
100
.1
686
2
12
37
10
2
8.
87
114
2
792
3
14.
• 93
8
.9
30
2.82
33,
• 5
191).
, 2
11,
.24
16.0
3
51
38
.7
522
7
11
17
14,
• 9
4
28
85
9
584
0
7,
.91
12,
.1
31
3.08
32
6
D68.
,0
9,
.08
16.8
3
39
1)1
6
489,
.2
9,
.50
15
.7
4
24
91
2
609,
.6
11.
33
11
6
32
7 86
68
6
706
4
9.
.1)2
10.6
8.
• 72
78
.1
695
6
10,
.53
10
5
9.
.26
120
8
880
5
13
32
8
1
CALC
3 UK
39
1
1)89
5
9,
.13
15 8
3
72
i)H
• 3
507
7
9
44
15
1
4.
¦ 36
67
9
631
2
12.
.08
11
8
BAG
3-93
D8
7
527
3
8
60
11).1)
i),
.15
5U
• 3
554
• 3
9,
.09
13
6
5
22
96
.7
686
• 7
10
09
10
4
IDLE
1.08
22,
.5
6D.
.1)
0,
.13
86 0
1,
.00
22
0
72
8
0
18
80
2
1
16
23
9
71,
.9
0
21
78
5
5MPH
11 06
283
2
81)9
3
1
51
6 7
9
79
275
7
888
4
1
31
6
6
11
42
285
2
927
5
1
80
6.
.3
10MPH
5.08
121),
¦ 5
535.
,9
0
.1)0
11.9
4
99
120,
¦ 9
573
.8
0
.58
11
.4
5.
28
115,
• 5
573,
.4
0.
,80
11,
• 5
15MPH
3 22
69
0
1)58
9
0
75
15 1
3
31
66
1)
463
8
1
31
15,
• 3
3.
29
58
5
494,
.0
2,
.24
14,
• 9
30MPH
2.00
12
0
359.
,7
3
.68
23.1
2,
.16
16
9
363
6
3,
.78
22
4
2.
22
10,
.4
1)32
3
6.
• 96
19
5
15MPH
1 95
11
3
1)20
8
8
02
20.0
2,
.07
9
7
422
.4
8
24
20
0
2.
50
19
6
537,
.8
13
00
15.
, 4
60MPH
2 21
18
• 9
H65
6
11
25
17 7
2,
.27
20
2
468
8
11
33
17
5
2.
,84
28
9
647
3
16.
,14
12,
.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
8"
-------
TABLE 11) CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1970 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NO X ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
ll
51
70
1
161
1
5
07
15
1
1
23
68
6
532
7
5
00
13
6
i)
59
67
0
517
9
5
1)5
13
9
2
1)
26
50
7
657
i)
5
65
11
8
3
97
13
0
691
7
6
28
11
5
1
36
19
1
783
0
8
30
10
2
3
7
78
108
7
921
6
1,
85
7
9
6
51
109
2
950
1
5
89
7
8
7
63
106
0
1010
6
7
22
7
2
i)
2
88
1)2
3
512
D
i)
39
15
1
2
81
10
8
551
2
H
96
11
1
2
97
10
6
607
.0
6
.29
13
0
5
2
10
2')
0
i)63
6
7
39
17
5
2
10
22
0
503
9
7
10
16
3
2
36
25
2
577
1
9.96
11
2
6
2
33
21
0
165
0
6
82
17
6
2
18
10
5
101
7
6
91
18
8
2
19
21
6
599
0
9
99
13
7
7
2
91
52
8
197
8
7
31
15
0
2
93
63
7
525
7
6
67
11
0
3
59
85
6
610
5
8.
.61
11
7
8
2
72
1)7
7
523
5
7
63
11
6
2
93
58
2
539
u
7
72
13
9
3
35
85
9
727
9
11
52
10
2
9
2,
,91
31
6
511
1
9
70
15
6
3
01
37
9
527
9
9
13
li)
9
3
75
77
6
660
1
10
82
11
2
10
3
1)0
29
0
563
6
9
98
11
3
3
39
31
7
583
5
9
65
13
8
D
00
69
5
792
9
13
07
Q
7
11
3
11
13
2
575
6
9
87
13
6
3
56
63
6
596
2
9
18
12
5
1
51
131
9
673
9
7
78
9
9
12
i),
,03
39
3
705
1
12
11
11
U
1
21
16
2
710
8
11
85
10
7
5
20
119
0
957
6
11
11
7
6
13
3
76
i)7
6
675
1
11
61
11
7
3
98
60
7
681
5
11
21
11
2
1
91
111
7
791
5
10
CO
8
6
11)
2
96
29
1
530
7
9
00
15
1
2
95
33
9
539
8
8
70
11
7
3
71
77
0
711
0
10
99
10
5
15
5
53
DO
0
552
1
6
02
11
0
D
76
10
D
560
1
5
15
13
9
5
13
53
0
703
1
7
73
10
0
16
11
92
115
1)
1121
6
7
55
6
6
10
96
115.
.1
1121
1
6,
.75
6
6
10
97
127
5
1332
7
9
97
5
7
37
3
36
1)9
n
530
7
7
20
11
3
3
23
16
5
529
3
8
60
11
5
3
60
60
6
625
6
10
02
12,
.1
18
3
19
33
8
572
3
8
72
11
0
3
18
30
5
582
6
7
11
13
9
3
22
i)t)
6
727
H
11
57
11
0
19
3
21
11
3
523
9
6
98
11
e
3
07
39
6
517
9
7
87
11
3
3
55
61
0
608
2
8
16
12
1
20
D
02
1)2
2
678
5
10
28
11
7
2
95
39
5
688
2
10
01
11
6
ii
56
68
8
831
8
11
81
9
3
21
3
65
110
3
600
l
7
39
ll
3
3
91
127
9
623
6
7
05
10
6
5
00
173
0
687
8
r>
69
9
1
22
i)
15
63
8
653
5
9
81
21
6
i)
31
75
it
666
2
9
30
11
1
D
91
127
8
678
7
12
17
8
1
23
7
01)
85
7
786
1
9
93
9
ll
6
81
92
2
826
5
9
82
0
9
7
10
115
5
952
7
1?
01
7
7
21)
2
50
28
5
533
D
9
61
15
1
2
61
31
8
517
3
9
81
11
7
3
20
73
i'
607
0
a
09
12
1
25
2
63
27
1
538
3
9
60
15
1
2
69
29
8
550
1
9
12
11
7
3
12
73
3
720
i)
11
22
10
5
26
7
52
53
2
80'l
6
9
'13
9
7
7
11
58
i)
803
5
S
58
9
7
7
57
81
2
100S
1
10
95
7
7
27
3
09
1)0
3
576
i)
10
65
13
7
3
31
15
5
632
i)
11
03
12
tj
i)
18
97
1
713
1
10
61
10
1
2S
-}
69
33
6
607
1
10
89
13
2
3
83
36
0
591
0
9
69
13
5
i)
27
65
3
805
1
12
35
9
6
29
6
10
68
9
723
0
9
31
10
1
6
21
77
i)
713
9
9
01
10
0
6
11
32
0
885
1
12
26
8
6
30
2
51
31
8
516
3
10
11
11
6
2
79
11
3
569
0
10
03
13
8
3
75
91
5
619
5
3
62
11
5
31
2
80
33
6
555
5
8
13
11
1
2
89
13
0
559
9
8
52
13
9
3
63
90
8
732
6
10
77
10
0
32
6
73
56
8
820
1
9
52
9
5
7
05
69
1
808
3
8
65
9
1
7
79
99
1
1007
1
10
87
7
5
CALC.
2
86
37
0
553.
9
8,
,119
11,
¦ 3
2
92
11
1
565
0
8
13
13
9
3
11
65
2
693
5
10
61
11
0
BAG
3
31
13
6
601
9
8,
.25
13
0
3
16
52
8
620
5
8
13
12
1
1
01
99
7
757
6
9
33
9
6
IDLE
0
68
15
i)
86
7
0
17
78
5
0
66
15
9
88
1
0
30
77
1
0
75
18
0
96
2
0
32
70
0
5MPH
7
53
176
6
1030
2
1
76
6
7
6
78
187
6
988
9
1
01
6
8
7
81
190
2
995
3
1
21
6
7
10MPH
2
69
67
7
737
i)
0
82
10
1
2
70
71
9
706
6
0
79
10
7
3
13
73
1)
711
0
0
87
10
6
15MPH
1
71
"3
5
575
1
0
81
13
7
1
56
11
1
565
5
0
75
11
0
1
71
39
H
592
6
0
83
13
5
30MPH
1
62
15
2
115
9
3
06
19
9
1
60
15
0
108
0
2
92
20
3
1
51
9
9
171
2
5
07
18
1
I)5MPH
1
73
17
2
153
1
7
70
18
3
1
90
20
3
173
8
7,
.99
17
3
2
25
25
7
571
0
11
09
11
3
60MPH
1
89
23
3
511
8
10
22
16
0
1
91
23
i)
513
6
10
37
15
9
2
25
28
3
687
9
11
82
12
0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RAT J 0
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80021
-------
TABLE 11) CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1971 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
1.
.63
67
6
531.
.0
5
.16
13
6
1
66
68,
.2
537
3
5
• 57
13 5
5
.16
81
2
620
1
6
10
11
5
2
1,
.53
17.
.6
699
1
5
.03
11
3
1
35
53
8
730
3
5
55
10 7
5
50
62
.6
761
2
6
89
10
1
3
7,
• 95
107.
• 5
1025
1
5
11
7
3
7.
.81
105
.1
1063
5
6
00
7 1
8
95
122
5
1139
9
7
50
6
5
D
3.
.12
31.
.7
563
.8
1
71
11,
.1
3
.08
13,
• 5
571
9
5,
• 59
13.6
3
• 37
15
0
621
.9
6
.51
12
.6
5
2
12
19.
.0
506
2
7
• 33
16
3
2
.11
21
5
519
0
8
09
15 9
2
¦ 30
22
• 5
583
• 9
8
75
11
.2
6
1.
.91
11
6
191.
¦ 9
5
83
17,
.2
1
99
11
.8
512
3
6
50
16.5
2
• 35
18
0
608
9
10
31
13
8
7
2,
.86
17.
• 3
511,
• 9
6
92
11
.1
3
.15
58
.2
511
.8
7
13
13 7
3
.50
91
2
631
1
8
11
11
3
8
2,
.11
10.
.1
552,
.1
8
06
11
.2
2
73
57
.8
566
1
8
02
13 3
3.
• 38
80
0
731
• 3
11
68
10
2
9
2
55
25
2
525,
• 3
9.
.86
15
• 5
2
10
31
6
552
• 5
9
65
11 6
3
32
75
5
683
.8
11
,12
10
9
10
2,
.62
18
1
609.
.2
9
21
13
.7
2
89
22
7
627
• 3
9,
.21
13 2
3
.65
58,
• 9
819
0
11,
.03
9
6
11
3
06
50,
,1
607
9
9
52
12,
.7
3
.50
61
0
626
9
9
78
12 0
1
.07
123
1
720
6
8,
,86
9
6
12
3
.35
30.
.6
752
1
11
.78
10,
• 9
3
• 78
11
1
778
0
12
08
10 1
1,
• 76
98
7
979
2
11,
.81
7.
.7
13
3
18
13.
,2
718,
• 9
12.
.07
11
1
1
.25
68,
.2
729.
.7
11
38
10 1
1
73
150
6
811
0
10
81
8,
.1
14
2
19
20.
.2
555.
.6
8
.80
11,
• 9
2
.80
30,
• 9
580,
.1
8
83
13.9
3,
¦ 38
70,
.7
725,
.3
11
17
10
5
15
1
18
31.
.6
586
1
5
.30
13.6
5.07
31.7
611
¦ 3
5
17
13.0
5
56
63,
,1
738
1
7
66
10
1
16
10
50
123.
.1
1231
2
7
51
6,
.1
12,
.11
128,
• 3
1263
7
7,
.17
5.9
12
12
161
1
1127,
.2
12,
.09
5.
, 1
17
3
23
15
2
512
1
9
.05
11
2
3
70
52,
• 5
603,
• 5
9,
.21
12 7
1
62
85
3
688
9
8.
.99
10,
,6
18
2,
.66
20.
.8
592
9
7
93
11
0
2
• 93
23
.8
611,
.7
8
12
13 1
1,
¦ 33
17
0
730
8
10.
57
10
8
19
3
00
31
8
552.
.6
7
85
11,
.1
3
30
10
3
570
2
8
21
13 8
1
08
60
3
669,
. 3
9
97
11
1
20
3
.36
25
6
699
5
8
• 98
11
8
3
70
31
2
693
.1
9
30
11 8
5
06
56.
,8
861
6
12
96
9
2
21
3
89
96
3
659
1
7
.61
10
8
1
13
132
1
651
.2
7.
• 55
10 2
6.
,51
192
9
738
2
7
31
8
1
22
3
61
57
8
687
9
9
17
11,
.2
1
.15
70,
.5
717
1
9
10
10 6
7
52
121,
,0
866,
.3
12
05
8
2
23
6
29
77.
• 3
853.
• 3
10
89
8
9
6
.95
89
7
867
2
11
07
8 6
9
61
126
8
1027.
,8
13.
32
7.
,1
21
2,
• 33
20.
.1
551.
.1
9
81
15
0
2
.78
28,
.1
560.
.8
9.
• 71
11 5
1,
,18
86
5
639
2
9
19
11
3
25
2
15
ll
5
561
7
9
.15
15
0
2
57
21
6
513
2
8
98
15 2
5
12
66
1
695
11
82
10
9
26
6
26
15
1
816
8
8
31
9
5
7
19
50
2
920,
,1
7
67
8 7
9
97
90
5
999.
¦5
10
75
7
6
27
2
91
35
0
610
0
11
10
12
6
3
50
15
7
666
9
11
58
11.8
1,
• 73
120,
9
710.
.7
10.
91
9
1
28
2
92
22
8
618
8
9
06
12,
.8
3
18
27
3
659.
• 3
9.
.31
12.1
1,
.09
66
5
802
1
11
86
9
6
29
5
51
65
2
792
1
9
81
9
.7
6,
.26
71,
.6
830
2
10.
58
9 2
6
51
103
6
910
2
12.
• 51
7
9
30
2
11
21.
,2
566.
.6
10,
• 30
11
5
2
96
36
6
572.
.1
9
51
13.9
1,
79
120.
,7
611.
,8
9.
.12
10
5
31
2
11
23
0
569
5
8,
.68
11
5
2,
• 92
36
9
585,
.7
8.
58
13.6
5
86
88
1
699
0
9
72
10
1
32
6
01
51
7
852
8
8
22
9
3
6
83
61
1
871
1
8.
,31
8 9
10
96
130
3
970.
,1
10.
26
7
3
CALC .
2.
52
28
0
581
1
8
22
11
0
2,
• 73
31.
.1
599.
,1
8,
,62
13.1
3
53
61
5
716
9
10
56
10
8
BAG
2
90
38
0
629.
2
8,
53
12
7
3
29
18
9
653
3
8.
,55
12.0
5
01
102.
,1
768.
,8
9.
29
9.
1
IDLE
0
71
11,
,6
99.
,7
0
32
71
0
0.69
11
1
105.
-5
0
11
68 1
0
76
15
7
107
6
0
19
65
9
5MPH
8
17
169.
.0
1196
5
2,
• 30
6
0
7,
.89
163.
,6
1210.
,9
2
81
5 8
9
11
179.
0
1261
1
3
08
5
6
10MPH
3
12
69
7
731
3
0
95
10
1
3
19
73.
,1
726
8
0,
93
10 1
3
82
80
0
731
1
1
33
10
2
15MPH
2.
,12
35.
,2
576
1
0
83
13
9
2
11
31
3
.588.
,6
0
91
13-7
2
29
31
1
589.
3
0
99
13
6
30MPH
1
51
12,
,1
395
0
1
73
21,
,2
1
16
10.0
130,
9
2,
17
19.7
1
16
5.
3
168
7
3
19
18
1
15MPH
1.
.25
5
0
170
3
5.
.51
18
1
1
20
7
2
180
1
7
03
17 9
1
59
7
6
576
2
10
68
15
0
60MPH
1
37
8
7
533
2
10
51
16.
,1
1
26
8
2
516
2
11
50
15.8
1.
16
10.
0
727.
6
11.
78
11.
9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
-------
TABLE 11) CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1972 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
D
02
55
0
693
3
1
22
11
2
3
92
51
2
579
5
5
05
13
2
1
67
79
8
611
2
5
80
11
1
2
3
58
38
9
732
6
1
99
11
0
3
58
36
7
820
3
5
31
10
0
5
12
19
0
757
0
8
90
10
1
3
5
91
71
7
1110
1
1
90
7
0
5
87
76
0
1119
6
5
76
7
1
7
69
92
.7
1101
0
8
96
7
0
i)
2
5'i
30
5
619
3
3
63
12
6
2
53
30
5
596
9
1
77
13
6
3
01
35
0
672
5
5
97
1?
0
5
2
21
15
3
583
9
5
12
11
1
1
73
15
8
557
1
6
57
15
1
2
18
22
1
629
6
7
75
13
2
6
2
11
11
9
501
2
6
19
16
9
1
66
12
3
512
6
5
97
15
6
2
53
21
6
625
5
7
98
13
3
7
2
53
79
7
582
2
5
62
12
1
2
75
81
6
517
0
5
20
13
0
3
07
100
9
659
3
6
15
10
7
8
2
19
55
2
555
6
7
16
13
7
2
11
66
1
612
5
6
23
12
2
3
06
91
7
753
2
8
21
9
7
9
2
13
35
1
598
0
7
85
13
1
2
b 5
16
0
551
1
7
60
11
0
3
53
113
3
710
1
8
13
9
9
10
2
63
27
2
588
6
8
76
13
9
2
88
31
3
631
5
7
98
12
7
3
32
73
9
821
->
J
9
21
9
1
11
2
76
52
0
690
1
7
81
11
1
3
35
81
.8
630
6
7
37
11
5
3
96
156
6
733
1
5
88
8
9
12
3
02
39
3
758
2
10
18
1C
7
3
61
52
1
827
8
9
13
9
6
1
78
] 21
9
999
1
10
83
7
?
J
13
3
27
61
1
770
3
9
00
10
1
3
69
80
5
762
1
9
22
9
9
1
21
173
3
838
7
8
07
7
9
11
2
21
31
5
519
7
7
18
11
6
2
59
39
?
590
8
7
21
13
1
3
00
89
3
768
1
0
u
35
0
7
15
3
52
37
8
586
1
1
39
13
5
1
36
39
3
611
7
1
77
12
9
3
68
62
8
736
3
7
71
io
5
16
7
21
118
9
1213
5
6
12
6
2
9
51
122
7
1225
3
7
01
6
1
10
15
163
7
1369
3
9
96
5
3
17
2
73
50
5
651
6
6
25
12
0
2
90
51
1
611
0
7
01
12
5
3
21
81
1
675
d
6
60
10
9
18
2
30
29
5
611
9
6
71
13
3
2
39
28
5
676
0
6
72
12
2
2
95
19
6
766
0
7
3n
m
1
19
2
19
12
3
631
1
5
98
12
5
2
51
17
8
598
h
6
18
13
0
3
28
59
6
679
7
8
7 9
n
3
20
3
01
36
9
726
5
/
12
11
2
2
93
37
1
798
3
7
33
10
2
1
57
60
0
891
1
9
If
0
9
21
3
62
135
8
736
2
5
59
9
2
3
72
159
2
683
2
5
65
9
1
1
59
207
7
767
6
28
8
0
22
3
38
72
5
681
8
7
65
11
0
•j
73
86
6
713
5
7
61
10
0
1
95
155
7
911
&
3
50
1
b
23
5
17
89
1
937
1
7
16
8
1
5
19
91
2
923
5
Q
51
8
2
6
28
129
7
971
6
12
S6
7
1
21
2
26
31
3
6 lb
3
7
11
13
1
2
26
10,
,7
599
7
7
66
13
2
3
29
i07
8
590
j
7
l:
li
(
S
25
2
08
28
5
561
6
8
18
11
1
2
29
33
0
589
0
7
85
13
7
3
01
89
g
689
0
9
16
10
6
26
5
25
53
9
837
6
6
77
9
5
5
38
51
6
896
2
7
23
e
9
6
82
95
6
1038
1
10
06
7
3
27
2
70
52
5
722,
.5
8
12
10
9
2
90
61
1
716
7
8,
• 98
10
8
3
31
115
7
718
1
8
00
9
0
28
2
77
35
]
621
6
8
09
1 2
9
2
92
39
0
686
7
7
81
11
7
3
12
89
1
8"7
1
q
99
3
9
29
i)
18
70
0
850
3
6
92
9
1
1
38
70
8
803
5
8
21
9
6
1
91
96
3
968
0
9
12
7
8
30
2
33
16
5
612
2
6
93
12
8
2
13
5/
2
613
5
7
15
12
5
2
85
137
1
676
1
5
72
9
9
31
2
32
12
3
571
2
8
07
13
8
2
10
57
5
626
1
7
11
12
3
J
05
113
0
717
7
7
98
9
5
32
5
29
67
1
863
3
7
31
9
0
5
12
73
1
907
2
7
05
8
5
5
96
127
1
1001
0
8
50
7
3
CALC
2
32
35
8
613
3
7
13
13
1
2
15
10
1
622
2
7
29
12
8
2
92
72
9
753
3
8
78
10
1
BAG
2
75
51
2
669
6
7
20
1]
/
2
95
62
8
705
0
7
51
10
9
3
65
]l£
1
80S
8
7
78
8
8
IDLE
0
66
13
5
96
0
0
16
7'l
1
0
59
10
9
103
1
0
13
72
5
0
55
10
7
101
0
0
17
71
2
5MPH
6
35
121
6
1218
1
1
11
6
2
6
21
122
3
1222
6
1
25
6
2
6
23
119
6
1211
7
2
19
6
1
10MPH
2
83
50
6
796
2
0
73
10
0
2
56
60
8
718
8
0
60
10
8
2
51
15
1
820
0
0
93
9
9
15MPH
1
75
32
7
593
7
0
89
13
6
1
80
28
7
601
2
0
78
13
6
1
70
21
2
621
g
1
11
13
3
30MPH
1
32
6
9
111
7
2
11
19
1
1
10
6
7
112
• 5
2.
. 15
19
1
1
32
7
1
533
6
3
76
16
2
15MPH
1
10
10
0
187
6
6
08
17
5
1
15
6.
,8
505
9
6.
¦ 63
17
0
1.
90
11
1
671
1
9
68
12
7
60MPH
1
31
11.
,7
552
5
9
88
15
1
1
10
10
6
557
1
10
36
15
3
1
65
20
2
790
6
13
78
10
7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLF)
FUEL tCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATOR1ES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80011
91
-------
TABLE 14 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
SIX 1973 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
FIRST TEST SECOND TEST THIRD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
5 68
85.
,5
574.
¦ 5
4,
.21
12.2
4.
.86
70
5
576
2
4.78
12 6
6 74
117,
.8
620
5
3.99
10
7
2
1.67
76
7
730
6
3
55
10 3
4,
.17
61,
.4
796,
• 5
3.88
9.8
5.34
94
• 3
790
4
3.98
9
.3
3
9.12
135,
,8
1054
7
3
99
6.8
8
35
113
6
1089
1
4 .23
6 9
9 46
150
5
1166
6
4.58
6
2
3.52
56
6
642
8
3
78
11 9
3,
.08
48,
¦ 3
642
0
4.15
12 2
3-50
55
1
693.
• 3
4.44
11
2
5
2.07
27,
¦ 5
554
7
5
18
14 7
2
02
22,
.0
566
6
5-97
14.6
2 47
42
6
637
2
6 52
12
5
6
1.96
17
0
510.
.0
3
82
16 3
2,
.11
13,
.8
546
3
4 48
15 1
2 24
27,
.8
640
4
5 41
12
8
7
2 80
75
9
563
8
5.
• 58
12.8
2
75
64
7
581
.0
6.05
12.8
3 49
103
, 1
629.
¦ 3
6 73
11
1
8
2.29
54,
.2
578
9
5
80
13 2
2
27
60,
.0
615
1
5 73
12.4
3.09
100
,8
766
.8
8.07
9
5
9
2-57
18.
• 7
574
6
6.
.70
13 5
2.
,68
42,
,4
582.
,7
6.87
13-5
3-58
96.
,6
734,
• 5
8.19
9
• 9
10
2. 60
30
5
609
0
6.
.41
13.3
2.
• 58
30
3
645,
.4
6.60
12.7
3.40
73.
,5
864,
.5
9.66
9,
.0
11
3 11
96,
• 5
627
6
7
.11
11 2
3
61
89
3
639
8
7 .48
11 2
4.47
173
2
773.
• 9
6 99
8
4
12
3-19
48.
.6
768,
.8
8,
.20
10.4
3.
.42
54
3
811
3
8 73
9.8
4 48
129
2
1000,
.1
10.02
7,
3
13
3 89
91,
.7
724
1
8
• 36
10.1
4.
.23
93
• 9
749
8
8 98
9 7
5.21
165.
.1
890,
.4
8 42
7
.6
11
2.28
35
0
575
1
5.
.79
13-9
2.
.69
41
0
603
.4
6 39
13.1
3.17
89.
. 1
749.
,2
7 49
9
9
15
4 .78
46
1
650,
.0
3
.46
12 0
5
.16
46
9
596
1
3 79
12.9
5 21
77
0
746
4
4.62
10.
.0
16
11 29
148
8
1207.
.9
4
66
6.0
11
80
134
0
1213
3
5.00
6.1
11 93
188
2
1410
1
5.90
5
1
17
3.31
69
2
599
1
6.
.17
12.4
3.
• 55
68,
¦ 3
615,
¦ 9
6.09
12 .1
4.02
126.
.1
672.
.6
6.06
10
0
18
2.57
35.
.2
646
7
5.
.17
12.5
2,
.73
38,
.7
663
5
5.20
12 1
3.48
72
3
781
7
5.99
9
8
19
3 15
49
6
577
6
5.
.88
13 3
3
30
56.
,2
573
4
5.76
13 2
3 84
99
9
6 48
4
5 53
10
9
20
3 24
37
8
779
2
5.
,64
10.5
3
51
49
7
801
6
5 77
10.0
4.47
92.
, 1
935.
,5
6 90
8
1
21
3-90
129
5
675
2
6
54
10 0
4
34
149
6
718
0
6.20
9 2
5 14
209
9
767
8
6 11
8
0
22
3 40
69.
• 3
714
5
5
86
10.6
3
73
83
7
735
0
7 00
10.1
4 79
164
1
844
5
8 41
7
9
23
6.23
88
4
925
6
6
78
8.2
7
25
92
9
918,
.0
7 86
8 2
7 25
160
6
978,
.1
8 87
7
1
24
2 33
41.
.2
575
8
6
¦ 94
13 7
2.
.61
47
9
594
4
7.29
13.1
3 08
112
8
574.
.6
6 82
11
7
25
2.05
29
9
583
7
6
07
13 9
2
18
35
0
601
8
6.40
13 1
2.94
113.
,3
661.
.4
8.25
10
5
26
6 39
60.
.4
871
,4
5
24
9 0
7 .
,27
64
4
877
0
5 40
8.9
7 66
148
2
913.
,4
7 10
7
6
27
3.16
70
0
666
9
8.
.17
11.3
3
13
79.
.4
709.
,9
8 07
10 5
4.39
175
1
699
7
7 67
9
0
28
2 97
35
5
656
¦ 9
5
76
12.3
3
32
38
.1
661
.2
6 71
12.1
4.04
114
8
718
1
7 64
9
.7
29
5-95
78
1
818
.2
6
72
9.2
6
30
70
• 3
B47
7
6.82
9.1
6.66
135.
.2
859
5
7 59
8
1
30
2.51
48.
.0
585.
.5
7.
.32
13 3
2
77
63
4
614
2
7-50
12-3
3 68
149
9
580
9
6.56
10
7
31
2-31
45
8
610.
.0
5
77
12.9
2.
• 43
50
8
627
3
6 - 79
12.4
3-3?
131
2
700.
,6
6.73
9.
.7
32
6 85
74
3
958
3
5
96
8 1
7
02
72
0
909
2
5.ae
8.5
7.80
165
1
977
9
6.02
7,
.0
CALC.
2.63
43
1
611
4
6
45
12.9
2,
.83
45.
• 3
619.
.7
6 78
12.7
3-35
82.
.6
727.
,2
7.62
10.
.2
BAG
3.19
62
3
662.
.2
5.
,89
11.5
3.
,36
65.
6
690
9
6.36
11.0
4.17
124.
,8
818.
,5
6.85
8
6
I0LE
1.06
15.
.6
90.2
0,
,07
75 1
1.
,22
16,
,4
89.2
0.09
74.6
1.12
17.
.5
82
0
0 10
78.
,4
5MPH
10.53
190
9
1206
0
0
84
5-8
11,
.81
196,
,2
1140.
.8
0 85
6 0
13 22
206
2
1070,
.0
1.35
6
2
10MPH
4.13
79.
¦ 9
827.
.8
0
68
9-2
4,
.57
77.
• 3
766.
.6
0.69
9.8
4.43
80.
3
818,
1
O.69
9.
,3
15MPH
2.55
52
0
601.
,4
0.
.59
12.8
2,
.85
48
7
582
6
0 81
13.3
2.72
48,
.1
600,
.5
0 71
13.0
30MPH
1.61
19.
.9
455.
.4
2.
.11
18.0
1
84
19.
3
429
5
2.12
19.1
1.89
12.
1
514.
9
4 13
16.
4
1I5MPH
1 30
5
8
497.
.6
4.
¦ 31
17.4
1
38
5
5
488.
,8
5 64
17 7
1 60
6
0
647
4
7.24
13.
4
60MPH
1 31
10,
.7
566.
.8
10
32
15.1
1
42
12.
.4
564,
.2
10.35
15 1
1.76
18.
8
744.
8
11.18
11
4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYOROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011
92
-------
TABLE 11 CONT'D
SUMMARY OF LOADED VEHICLE TESTS ON
FORTY-TWO 1967-1973 MODEL YEAR VEHICLES
DETROIT
MODAL EMISSION TEST PROCEDURE
--- FIRST TEST SECOND TEST *TH I RD TEST
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1
8
08
81
6
503
8
1
11
13
5
6
87
85
7
502
8
4
71
13
5
7
49
99
8
535
1
4
90
12
4
2
7
89
71
2
611
9
1
80
11
1)
6
71
75
4
685
5
5
20
10
8
7
68
88
1
721
5
6
82
10
0
3
13
82
132
7
920
0
1
95
7
6
12
18
137
6
960
5
5
52
7
3
13
75
153
4
1015
7
7
11
6
6
4
5
S3
56
2
527
2
4
51
11
0
5
00
57
4
511
0
4
97
13
7
5
S5
63
0
590
6
6
05
12
5
5
89
31
3
181
9
6
39
16
1
3
62
34
3
199
3
6
91
15
7
4
36
44
7
563
7
8
24
13
7
6
3
87
27
6
156
6
5
19
17
3
3
58
29
9
468
3
5
83
16
9
4
72
42
4
579
1
8
16
13
4
7
it
96
73
6
510
9
6
59
13
B
5
08
82
5
524
1
6
54
13
2
5
52
106
1
600
8
7
59
11
3
8
i)
51
61
3
516
2
6
31
14
2
1
57
71
1
538
1
6
76
13
4
5
66
121
5
703
8
9
52
9
7
9
4
57
46
1
511
7
8
21
14
8
4
63
54
0
523
8
8
08
11
2
5
73
103
5
658
0
9
82
10
6
10
5
26
38
1
557
2
8
10
11
0
5.
.29
44
0
576
5
8
02
13
4
6
75
104
5
778
6
11
24
0
2
11
5
51
80
1
572
J)
8
00
12
4
5
87
98
4
583
3
7
94
11
7
6
78
160
2
680
3
7
51
9
¦?
J
12
6
36
58
1
690
9
9
90
11
1
6
74
70,
,0
728
9
10
C3
10
3
7
94
156
6
9 30
2
12
29
7
h
13
6
13
82
9
659
8
9
71
11
0
6
90
100
8
685
7
9
85
10
2
7
72
176
0
800
7
9
47
8
0
It
4
66
1
513
0
7
36
14
9
4
89
52
9
533
9
7
41
14
0
5
65
106
4
691
8
9
52
10
1
15
8
02
51
6
5"9
6
1
73
13
4
8
33
59
4
548
8
4
78
13
3
9
59
89
7
689
8
6
98
10
3
16
18
88
157
7
3081
5
6
32
6
4
19
51
163
8
1092
9
6
41
5
3
22
47
211
1
1286
0
9
27
5
3
17
5
76
68
9
528
0
6.96
13
6
5
96
80
7
549
2
7
36
12
8
7
27
116
2
6:6
b
7
51
30
8
18
5
05
16
1
556
1
6
.59
13
8
5
12
52
7
580
1
6
60
13
1
6
30
84
7
690
7
8
56
30
r
19
5
19
58
6
521
0
6
50
11
1
5
66
70
1
530
2
6
85
13
5
6
75
94
5
600
3
7
5"
11
5
20
6
37
5b
6
660
1
7
57
11
6
6
73
65 7
716
Q
7
71
10
5
8
23
100
5
815
7
9
93
8
9
21
6
37
125
8
611
7
6
96
10
7
6
79
155
3
626
7
6
67
a
9
7
61
201
1
698
0
6
69
8
S
22
6
60
80
5
637
8
7
75
11
3
7
07
97
8
661
3
7
85
10
6
8
26
169,
.2
831
n
10
12
7
n
23
10
70
107
0
798
8
8
70
8
9
11
27
115
9
819
i'
9
48
8
6
12
65
166
9
9 38
0
11
31
7
2
21)
'1
13
HI
6
523
1
8
16
11
6
4
63
54
8
538
4
S
37
13
0
5
52
109
0
581
5
0
06
11
5
25
4
20
36
5
519
0
7
77
15
1
4
48
42
7
529
0
7
72
14
5
5
49
107
4
659
i
9
so
10
5
26
10
86
71
6
779
7
7
12
9
5
11
38
77
9
803
3
7
18
9
2
13
60
133
5
937
7
JO
12
7
5
27
5
60
69
7
596
6
9
13
12
3
6
01
84
7
627
1
9
29
11
!'
6
83
153
9
690
0
S
9 3
9
3
28
5
96
17
1
585
0
7
98
13
1
6
31
52
7
601
8
02
12
6
b
86
110
4
752
7
30
35
9
4
29
9
55
85
9
731
0
e
29
9
9
10
08
93
6
754
8
8
82
9
5
11
32
129
6
S60
4
10
56
8
1
30
it
H9
53
9
536
0
8
23
11
0
4
86
71
4
551
4
e
03
13
1
5
71
130
c
U
600
0
7
23
10
8
31
4
12
19
9
533
1
7
28
14
2
4
77
62
3
554
2
7
45
13
3
5
92
126
2
676
7
8
73
9
9
32
10
63
85
7
798
2
7
10
9
2
11
35
96
7
798
4
7
59
9
0
13
44
158
4
933
8
9
16
7
2
CALC
1
71
49
3
516
5
7
29
13
9
4
87
55
9
559
5
7
45
13
4
5
61
86
5
682
9
9
40
10
6
BAG
5
12
61
589
8
7
13
12
5
5
76
76
3
617
8
7
31
11
7
7
10
132
9
7 39
4
0
12
9
1
1 DLE
1
13
17
0
82
9
0
16
78
4
1
17
16
8
86
4
0
19
76
)
1
1'.
17
8
86
8
0
23
74
0
5MPH
13
9?
199
9
1012
1
1
49
6
3
12
57
196
1
1034
1
1
35
6
4
12
93
207
5
1037
2
1
73
6
10MPH
5
68
98
1
667
3
0
62
10
6
5
76
91
6
647
5
0
65
10
5
5
59
97
1
676
2
0
81
10
5
15MPH
3
99
59
5
517
5
0
70
14
2
4
03
57
6
515
1
0
79
14
!•
4
06
57
7
536
5
1
02
13
9
30MPH
2
86
23
3
395
6
2
39
20
1
2
80
23
2
395
4
2
52
20
1
3
04
20
9
463
8
4
35
17
r
>
45MPH
2
74
18
7
118
9
5
83
18
2
2
90
18
6
158
4
6
15
17
9
3
41
23
6
587
3
9
93
14
0
60MPH
2
93
21
9
513
5
9
81
15
9
2
90
22
1
514
7
10
03
15
9
3
32
30
8
70S
6
13
89
11
6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE CPER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON CMINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 1 85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC
19900 E COLFAX, AURORA, COLO 80011
O
-------
3.6 DISCUSSION OF SOUND LEVEL TEST RESULTS
Sound level test results as obtained from 85 San Antonio area
vehicles are presented in Table 15 (one page). Data indicate small dif-
ferences in average sound levels from model-year to model-year for each
of the operating modes. In comparing sound levels by mode, however,
the WOT acceleration of SAE J 9S6a resulted in the highest level at
72.0 db followed by the 60 mph cruise at 69.4 db, the 40 mph cruise at 64.0 db
and the 20 mph cruise at 56.8 db. The idle mode, with measurements
taken relatively close to the vehicle, does not apply in this comparison.
94
-------
FABLE 15
SUMMARY OK bOUNU LEVEL TESTS
BY MODEL YEAR
DECIBELS
MODEL
tt OF
ACCELERATION
CRUISE (MPH)
YEAR
VEH.
AMB.
WOT
1/46
IDLE
20
40
60
1968
?.
40.5
69.5
65.5
61.0
58. 0
64. 5
69.0
196'}
10
38.8
74. 1
68.1
59.6
57.9
65.1
70.0
1^70
5
40.6
70.6
67.6
59.2
57.0
63.8
69.4
1 971
1 l
38.6
74.b
67.7
5H. b
56.4
63.9
70.1
1"72
19
38. 7
71 .3
6b . 4
59.2
56.8
64.1
69.4
19 f '5
23
38.7
72.5
66. 0
59.1
56. 3
64. 0
69.2
1974
1 5
38.7
6^. 5
68 • 3
59.1
56. 7
63. 4
68.8
TOTALS
>35
38.8
72.0
67. 0
5^.2
56. 8
64. n
69. 4
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORA TOR IES»INC.
19^0') E. COLFAX* AURORA» COLO. «0fJ11
-------
96
-------
APPENDICES
97
-------
Appendix A - Listing of Vehicle and Test Parameters
Legend
VEH - Vehicle Number
RUN - Run Number
DATE - Date of Test (month, day, year)
YR - Ilodel Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
C - Number of Cylinders
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
V - Number of Carburetor Venturis (Ojfuel injection)
T - Type of Transmission (1: automatic, 3? 3-speed manual, 4: 4-speed
manual, 5: 5 speed manual)
A - Air Conditioning? (1 : yes, 2 : no)
¦nT - Fuel Tank Capacity in Gallons
IRPM - Idle RPM
P - PCV System Operational (1: yes, 2; no)
DW - Ignition Point Dwell in Degrees (99: electronic Ignition)
IGN - Ignition Timing in Degrees ( + indicates before top dead center;
- indicates after top dead center)
TESTS - Additional test performed on this Vehicle
1 : Modal Emissions Tests
3 : Tests on A/C Vehicles
4 ; Evaporative Emissions Tests
6 : Tests on Loaded Vehicles
INRT - Dynamometer Inertia Weight Setting
RLHP - Road Load Horsepower Setting
L - Was 10% added RLHP added to Simulate Air-Conditioner? (1; yes, 2: no)
DB - Dry-Bulb Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
WB - Wet Bulb Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
BAROM - Barometric Pressure (Inches Hg)
98
-------
APPENDIX A
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V
T
A
FT
IRPM P
DW
IGN
TESTS
INRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
001
D073
050771
74
BUI C
RI VI
8
455
4
1
1
26
0500 1
99
+04
1
5000
14
7
1
68
50
24
55
002
D020
012374
74
CHEV
CAPR
8
400
2
1
1
26
0640 1
30
+08
1
1500
11
0
1
74
50
24
73
003
D017
012274
74
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
4
1
1
21
0450 1
30
+ 08
1
3500
12
3
1
75
51
24
72
oo4
D084
050974
74
DODG
DART
8
318
2
1
2
16
0570 1
37
+03
1
3500
12
3
1
74
19
24
36
005
0235
071174
74
FORD
MAVE
8
302
2
1
1
15
0710 1
28
+ 05
1
3000
10
3
2
80
61
24
80
006
D022
042474
74
FORD
TORI
8
351
2
1
1
22
0630 1
27
+ 08
1
1000
13
2
1
69
50
24
71
007
D008
041974
74
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
4
1
1
22
0800 1
30
+ 12
1
4000
13
2
1
82
53
21
22
008
D019
042374
74
PLYM
SCAM
8
318
2
1
2
16
0600 1
37
+ 04
1
3500
12
3
1
69
52
24
73
009
D015
042274
74
PONT
CATA
8
400
2
1
1
26
0640 1
29
+ 10
1
4500
14
0
1
69
47
24
73
010
D021
042474
74
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
1040 1
50
+ 10
1
2000
8
3
2
69
49
24
68
Oil
D219
070274
73
AMMO
GREM
6
232
1
1
2
21
0580 1
30
+06
1,1
3000
11
3
1
79
57
24
74
012
D057
050374
73
BUI C
CENT
8
350
4
1
1
22
G780 1
31
+ 12
1
4000
13
2
1
76
55
24
60
013
D010
043071
73
BUI C
RI VI
8
455
1
1
1
26
0580 1
31
+ 08
1
5000
14
7
1
78
55
24
61
Oil
D075
050874
73
CADI
FLEE
8
472
4
1
1
28
0520 1
30
+ 08
1
5500
15
3
1
74
52
24
51
015
D077
050874
73
CAPR
SEDA
6
155
2
1
1
12
0650 1
38
+ 08
1
2500
9
4
2
78
57
24
61
016
D248
071674
73
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
1
1
1
11
0700 1
32
+ 12
1,1
2500
9
4
2
77
60
24
79
017
D239
071574
73
CHEV
NOVA
6
250
1
3
2
21
0850 1
39
+06
1,1
3500
11
2
2
83
61
24
80
018
D068
050674
73
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
1
2
21
0520 1
29
+ 16
1
3500
11
2
2
69
51
24
63
019
D060
050374
73
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
1
2
21
0530 1
27
+ 09
1
3500
12
3
1
69
50
24
66
020
D237
070874
73
CHEV
MAL I
8
350
2
1
1
22
0700 1
30
+ 06
1,1
1000
12
0
2
77
59
24
79
021
D213
062874
73
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2
1
1
22
0580 1
29
+ 10
1,1
1000
13
2
1
81
57
24
54
022
DO83
050874
73
CHEV
MONT
8
350
4
1
1
26
0710 1
28
+ 16
1
1000
13
2
1
81
57
24
39
023
D195
062174
73
CHEV
CAPR
8
400
2
1
1
26
0620 1
30
+ 08
1,4
4500
14
0
1
82
65
24
78
021)
D031
042674
73
CHRY
NEWP
8
400
2
1
1
23
0890 1
42
+ 08
1
4500
14
0
1
69
53
24
89
025
D052
050274
73
DATS
1200
4
071
2
4
10
1000 1
50
+ 10
1
2000
8
3
2
70
50
24
46
026
0196
062174
73
DODG
DART
6
225
1
1
1
16
0630 1
99
+ 03
1,1
3000
10
3
2
75
62
24
78
027
D033
042974
73
DODG
CHAR
8
318
2
1
1
20
0600 1
31
+ 00
1
4000
13
2
1
69
48
24
90
028
D231
070971
73
FORD
PINT
4
097
2
4
11
0800 1
38
+ 13
1,1
2500
9
4
2
75
59
24
62
029
D079
050874
73
FORD
MAVE
6
250
1
1
1
15
0530 1
34
+ 06
1
3000
10
3
2
72
54
24
51
030
0241
071271
73
FORD
MAVE
8
302
2
1
1
15
0500 1
23
+ 08
1
3000
11
3
1
71
63
24
76
031
D211
062774
73
FORD
TORI
8
351
2
1
20
0860 1
26
+ 08
1,1
4000
12
0
2
78
57
24
69
032
0216
070171
73
FORD
TORI
8
351
2
1
1
23
0680 1
27
+ 08
1,1
4000
13
2
1
82
59
24
55
033
0215
070374
73
FORD
STAW
8
100
2
1
1
21
0410 1
24
+ 08
1,1
5000
14
7
1
83
68
21
70
031
D227
062874
73
FORD
LTD
8
100
2
1
1
22
0590 1
30
+ 08
1,1
4500
14
0
1
71
57
24
62
035
0222
070374
73
MAZD
RX2
2
070
4
4
1
17
0420 2
48
+ 05
1,1
2750
9
9
2
81
55
24
72
036
D213
071574
73
MERC
BROU
8
129
4
1
1
22
0670 1
28
+ 14
1,1
4000
13
2
1
80
61
24
70
037
D208
062774
73
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
4
1
22
0700 1
28
+08
1, 4
4000
13
2
1
81
56
24
67
038
D220
070274
73
OLDS
CUTL
8
155
4
1
1
22
0650 1
31
+ 09
1,1
4000
13
2
1
76
56
24
82
039
D210
071274
73
PLYM
VAL I
8
318
2
1
1
16
0620 1
40
+ 10
1,1
3500
11
2
2
77
62
24
77
OHO
D232
071074
73
PLYM
FURY
8
360
2
1
1
23
0800 1
11
+01
1, 4
4000
13
2
1
81
61
24
62
Oil
0047
050174
73
PONT
LEMA
8
350
2
1
1
22
0670 1
29
+00
1
4000
13
2
1
69
51
24
44
012
D207
062674
73
PONT
CATA
8
400
2
1
1
26
0650 1
30
+ 12
1,1
1500
11
0
1
76
58
24
68
013
D055
050274
73
TOYO
CORO
4
120
2
1
1
10
0640 1
50
+ 12
1
2750
9
9
2
69
50
24
75
014
D202
062574
73
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
2
1
11
0720 1
45
+ 02
1,1
2250
8
8
2
82
59
24
64
015
D076
050874
73
VOLK
STAW
4
103
0
1
1
10
0600 1
48
+ 10
1
2750
9
9
2
76
51
21
52
016
D080
050974
72
BUIC
SKYL
8
350
2
1
1
19
0540 1
32
+ 04
1
3500
12
3
1
70
52
21
50
017
D016
042271
72
BUI C
CENT
8
155
4
1
1
24
0700 1
33
+ 06
1
4500
14
0
1
75
55
21
73
018
D010
012274
72
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
1
3
2
11
0800 1
30
+ 08
1
2500
9
4
2
73
50
24
72
019
D029
042674
72
CHEV
NOVA
6
250
1
3
2
16
1200 1
28
+ 08
1
3000
10
3
2
70
16
24
52
050
D011
041874
72
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
3
2
16
0850 1
26
+ 04
1
3500
11
2
2
68
50
24
76
051
0007
041874
72
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2
1
1
24
0560 1
22
+06
1
4500
14
0
1
70
18
24
33
052
0006
041874
72
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
2
1
1
16
0500 1
29
+ 12
1
3500
12
3
1
68
50
24
45
053
0257
072274
72
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2
1
1
24
0600 1
28
+ 06
1
4500
14
0
1
72
61
24
79
051
D091
051074
72
CHEV
STAW
8
400
2
1
1
17
0690 1
28
+ 08
1
5000
14
7
1
78
50
24
62
055
D025
042574
72
DATS
SEDA
4
097
2
4
10
0800 1
56
+ 10
1
2250
8
8
2
68
53
24
55
056
D032
042674
72
DODG
OART
8
318
2
1
1
18
0680 1
29
+ 02
1
3000
10
3
2
77
57
24
89
057
D026
042574
72
DODG
POLA
8
360
2
1
1
23
0560 1
31
+ 05
1
4000
13
2
1
68
56
21
44
058
O037
042974
72
FORD
PINT
4
122
2
1
11
0650 1
40
+ 12
1
2250
8
8
2
69
51
24
89
059
D012
041874
72
FORD
MAVE
8
302
2
1
1
15
0580 1
30
+ 06
1
3000
10
3
2
72
50
24
78
060
D028
042671
72
FORD
TORI
8
351
2
1
1
22
0660 1
19
+ 12
1
4000
12
0
2
69
18
24
53
99
-------
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
HAKE
MODL
C
CID
V T
A
FT
IRPM P
DW
IGN TESTS
INRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
061
D06 U
050671
72
FORD
STAW
8
351
2 1
1
21
0600 1
31
+ 12 1
1500
11
0
1
70
51
24
60
062
D071
050771
72
FORD
LTD
8
100
2 1
1
22
0580 1
26
+ 04 1
1500
11
0
1
72
52
21
58
063
D251
071774
72
FORD
THUN
8
429
4 1
1
22
0610 1
25
+ 10 1
4500
11
0
1
81
62
21
87
064
D082
050871
72
LINC
CONT
8
160
4 1
1
23
0580 1
29
+ 00 1
5000
14
7
1
72
53
21
52
065
D036
012974
72
MERC
MONT
8
100
2 1
2
21
0705 1
30
+06 1
5000
11
7
1
68
50
21
89
066
D065
050674
72
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
4 1
1
20
0580 1
28
+ 10 1
1000
13
2
1
70
50
21
61
067
D185
053074
72
OLDS
DELT
8
455
4 1
1
19
0580 1
31
+08 1
4500
14
0
1
69
50
24
77
068
D042
013071
72
OPEL
1900
1
116
2 1
2
11
0740 1
58
+ 00 1
2500
9
1
2
68
18
21
63
069
D086
051071
72
PLYM
DUST
6
198
1 1
2
16
0540 1
11
+ 10 1
3000
10
3
2
71
52
21
10
070
DOll
013074
72
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2 1
1
21
0540 1
29
+ 02 1
3500
12
3
1
70
50
21
70
071
D056
050274
72
PONT
LEMA
8
350
2 1
2
20
0500 1
31
+08 1
3500
12
3
1
72
55
21
59
072
DO ^ 4
050174
72
PONT
BONN
8
155
2 1
1
25
0660 1
30
+ 11 1
1500
14
0
1
72
54
21
55
073
DO ^6
050174
72
TOYO
CORO
4
097
2 1
2
13
0660 1
52
+ 10 1
2250
8
8
2
70
48
21
50
074
D063
043074
72
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1 1
2
11
1200 1
60
+ 04 1
2000
8
3
2
70
53
21
59
075
0067
050674
72
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
2
11
1200 1
56
-05 1
2000
8
3
2
73
55
21
59
076
D050
050274
71
AMMO
STAW
8
304
2 1
2
17
0580 1
32
+ 04
1000
12
0
2
72
53
24
14
077
D134
051774
71
BUI C
SKYL
8
350
2 1
1
19
0600 1
27
+ 01
3500
12
3
l
74
58
21
54
078
D058
050374
71
8UIC
ELEC
8
455
4 1
1
24
0580 1
30
+08
1500
14
0
1
70
51
21
60
079
D119
051574
71
CADI
DEVI
8
172
4 1
1
27
0620 1
28
+ 10
5000
11
7
1
70
18
21
51
080
D107
051474
71
CHEV
VEGA
1
140
1 1
2
11
0640 1
30
+08
2500
9
4
2
72
52
21
40
081
D166
052174
71
CHEV
MALI
8
307
2 1
2
20
0500 1
27
+ 09
3500
31
2
2
76
47
21
82
082
D133
051674
71
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
2 1
1
16
0540 1
30
+02
3500
11
2
2
70
54
21
45
083
D253
071874
71
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2 1
1
19
0600 1
27
+ 01
3500
12
3
1
86
61
21
87
081)
D148
051874
71
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2 1
1
24
0570 1
29
+ 10
1000
13
2
1
77
16
21
45
085
D132
051674
71
CHEV
IMPA
8
400
2 1
1
21
0580 1
25
+ 05
1000
13
2
1
78
58
24
45
086
D163
052174
71
CHRY
300
8
440
4 1
1
23
0580 1
27
+ 06
1500
11
0
1
70
51
24
70
087
D094
051174
71
DATS
SEDA
1
071
2 1
2
10
1100 1
16
+ 08
2000
8
3
2
76
53
21
33
088
D138
051774
71
DODG
VAN
8
318
2 1
2
25
0540 1
27
+ 01
4000
13
2
1
70
54
21
52
089
D128
051674
71
FORD
PINT
1
122
2 4
2
11
1000 1
18
+ 10
2250
8
8
2
72
55
21
43
090
D045
050174
71
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1 1
2
15
0580 1
33
+ 10
2750
9
9
2
70
50
21
51
091
D070
050774
71
FORD
STAW
8
302
2 1
2
18
0560 1
29
+ 10
1000
12
0
2
72
52
21
59
092
0118
050874
71
FORD
MUST
8
351
2 1
2
20
0480 1
28
+05
3500
12
3
1
71
50
21
41
093
D109
051474
71
FORD
THUN
8
429
4 1
1
23
0580 1
33
+ 10
4500
14
0
1
72
52
24
41
091
0103
051374
71
MERC
MONT
8
100
2 1
1
22
0620 1
29
412
1500
14
0
1
72
48
21
49
095
D12l
051671
71
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2 1
1
20
0580 1
30
+ 10
3500
12
3
1
75
57
21
43
096
DllO
051774
71
OLDS
DELT
8
455
2 1
1
25
0620 1
34
+04
1500
14
0
1
76
58
21
54
097
D255
071974
71
PLYM
SCAM
6
225
1 1
2
17
0660 1
30
+07
3000
10
3
2
79
61
21
87
098
D039
013074
71
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2 1
1
21
0580 1
28
+ 06
3500
12
3
1
68
50
21
11
099
D121
051574
71
PONT
FIRE
8
350
2 1
1
17
0810 1
30
+ 12
4000
13
2
1
79
55
21
50
100
Dill
051474
71
PONT
CATA
8
100
2 1
1
19
0610 1
33
+ 12
1500
11
0
1
74
49
21
31
101
D117
051574
71
TOYO
CORO
1
097
2 4
1
12
1200 1
52
+ 17
2000
8
3
2
72
50
21
10
102
0122
051574
71
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
2
11
1200 1
50
-03
2000
8
3
2
75
53
21
50
103
D030
042674
70
BUIC
STAW
8
455
4 1
1
24
0650 1
29
+ 20
5000
11
7
1
69
51
21
89
104
D171
052274
70
CHEV
STAW
6
250
1 3
2
18
1000 1
31
+ 12
1000
12
0
2
70
49
21
71
105
D117
051874
70
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2 1
1
18
0600 1
27
-10
3500
11
2
2
75
47
21
45
106
D131
051674
70
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2 1
1
23
0500 1
30
-11
4500
12
7
2
75
57
21
11
107
0069
050674
70
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2 1
1
25
0610 1
31
+ 12
4000
13
2
1
69
52
21
60
108
D113
051474
70
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2 1
1
18
0410 1
30
-05
3500
12
3
1
77
50
21
31
109
D130
051674
70
CHEV
IMPA
8
100
2 1
1
25
0580 1
28
-10
4000
13
2
1
72
56
21
45
110
D027
012674
70
DODG
POLA
8
383
2 1
1
24
0510 1
29
+ 10
1500
14
0
1
69
46
21
53
111
0009
041974
70
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1 1
1
16
0510 1
30
+06
2750
9
9
2
76
51
24
2b
112
D013
041974
70
FORD
MUST
8
302
2 1
2
22
0575 1
33
+ 06
3000
10
3
2
73
48
21
75
113
oom
042274
70
FORD
TORI
8
351
2 1
2
20
0560 1
27
+ 11
3500
11
2
2
69
18
21
73
ill
D170
052274
70
FORD
CUST
8
351
2 3
1
24
0680 1
30
+ 06
1000
13
2
1
79
52
21
70
115
0038
042674
70
FORD
LTD
8
390
2 1
1
24
0625 1
28
+ 11
1000
13
2
1
70
50
21
85
116
D062
050374
70
MERC
MARQ
8
129
4 1
1
22
0500 1
34
+ 06
1500
11
0
1
70
49
21
61
117
D137
051774
70
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2 1
1
20
0560 1
31
+ 08
1000
13
2
1
72
57
21
53
118
D135
051774
70
OLDS
TORO
8
455
1 1
1
24
0640 1
23
+ 06
4500
11
0
1
70
57
21
54
119
dio6
051474
70
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
2
21
0100 1
30
+00
4000
13
2
1
72
51
21
40
120
D249
071774
70
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
1
24
0760 1
31
+00
4000
12
0
2
81
63
21
88
-------
APPENDIX A,CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DENVER
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V T
A
FT
IRPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS INRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
121
D127
051671
70
PONT
LEMA
8
350
2 1
2
21
0580
1 29
+08
1000
13
2
1
72
57
21
12
122
D151
052071
70
PONT
STAW
8
100
2 1
1
21
0500
1 32
+00
5000
11.7
1
81
50
21
61
123
D259
073171
70
TOYO
CORO
1
116
2 1
1
12
1000
1 51
+06
2500
9
1
2
79
62
21
88
121
D112
05H71
70
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
2
11
1220
1 50
+ 10
2000
8
3
2
78
52
21
31
125
D085
050971
69
AMMO
STAW
8
290
2 1
2
16
0550
1 28
-05
3000
11
3
1
71
52
21
31
126
D066
050671
69
BUI C
LESA
8
350
1 1
1
25
0600
1 31
+ 10
1000
13
2
1
71
50
21
60
127
D093
051071
69
CHEV
CIO
6
250
1 3
2
20
0700
1 30
+00
1000
12
0
2
75
18
21
61
128
D139
051771
69
CHEV
MALI
8
307
2 1
2
20
0520
1 30
+02
3500
11
2
2
76
59
21
51
129
D116
051871
69
CHEV
STAW
8
327
2 3
2
22
0730
1 11
-01
1500
12
7
2
78
19
21
37
130
D013
013071
69
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
1 1
1
20
0610
1 32
+ 03
1000
12
0
2
68
11
21
65
131
D018
012371
69
CHEV
CAMA
8
350
1 1
1
18
0110
1 33
+00
3500
12
3
1
69
52
21
66
132
D167
052171
69
CHEV
STAW
8
127
1 1
1
22
0600
1 29
-07
1500
11
0
1
82
50
21
77
133
D101
051371
69
CHRY
NEWP
8
383
2 1
1
21
olio
1 28
+05
1500
11
0
1
76
17
21
19
131
D156
052071
69
DODG
DART
6
225
1 1
1
18
0180
1 31
+02
3000
10
3
2
71
16
21
65
135
Dill
051771
69
FORD
FAIR
8
302
2 1
2
20
0600
1 21
+06
3500
11
2
2
78
58
21
51
136
D258
072271
69
FORD
MUST
8
302
2 1
1
20
0720
1 26
+07
3000
10
3
2
82
62
21
80
137
0116
051571
69
FORD
TORI
8
351
2 1
1
20
0520
1 27
+ 11
3500
11
2
2
72
51
21
39
138
DUO
051171
69
FORD
TORI
8
351
2 1
1
20
0500
1 26
+ 10
3500
12
3
1
72
52
21
11
139
D098
051371
69
FORD
GALA
8
390
2 1
1
21
0610
1 29
+08
1000
13
2
1
70
50
21
10
1«I0
D097
051371
69
MERC
MONT
8
390
2 1
1
21
0580
1 32
+01
1500
11
0
1
70
50
21
10
ill
D019
050171
69
OLDS
98
8
155
2 1
1
25
0510
1 31
+08
1500
11
0
1
70
18
21
18
112
D115
051571
69
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
1
21
0610
1 33
+06
1000
12
0
2
72
52
21
39
113
D112
051771
69
PONT
FIRE
8
350
2 1
2
19
0720
1 31
-11
3500
12
3
1
77
55
21
51
111
D136
051771
69
PONT
GTO
8
100
1 1
2
21
0620
1 32
¦(09
1000
13
2
1
70
51
21
53
115
D160
052171
69
VOLK
SEDA
1
091
1 1
2
10
1280
1 50
+ 10
2250
8
8
2
70
19
21
70
116
D169
052171
68
AMMO
JAVE
6
232
1 3
2
19
0810
1 21
-12
3000
10
3
2
68
15
21
73
117
D252
071871
68
BUI C
RIVE
8
130
1 1
1
21
0660
1 29
+08
1500
11
0
1
82
63
21
87
118
D153
052071
68
CADI
DEVI
8
172
1 1
1
26
0680
1 30
+ 10
5000
11
7
1
71
52
21
61
119
D096
051171
68
CHEV
STAW
6
230
1 3
2
18
0570
1 27
-03
3500
11
2
2
72
50
21
27
150
D171
052271
68
CHEV
STAW
8
307
2 3
2
22
0580
1 23
+ 10
1000
12
0
2
82
53
21
70
151
D155
052071
68
CHEV
CAMA
8
327
2 1
2
18
0500
1 33
-09
3500
11
2
2
71
16
21
61
152
D161
052071
68
CHEV
IMPA
8
307
2 1
1
25
0590
1 28
+ 15
1000
12
0
2
70
19
21
70
153
D115
051571
68
CHEV
MALI
8
396
1 1
2
20
1000
1 30
-10
3500
1?
3
1
75
17
21
37
151
D256
071971
68
DODG
POLA
8
383
2 1
1
21
0800
1 27
+08
1000
13
2
1
70
63
21
87
155
D100
051071
68
FORD
MUST
6
200
1 1
2
20
0570
1 10
+ 15
3000
10
3
2
70
50
21
10
156
D173
052271
68
FORD
MUST
8
289
2 1
2
20
0580
1 21
+15
3000
10
3
2
72
18
21
71
157
D172
052271
68
FORD
MUST
8
302
1 1
2
20
0570
1 29
+ 10
3000
10
3
2
70
19
21
70
158
0072
050771
68
FORD
STAW
8
390
2 1
1
19
0600
1 23
+ 10
1500
11
0
1
68
50
21
55
159
D151
052071
68
MERC
COUG
8
302
2 1
2
17
0510
1 29
+09
3500
12
3
1
71
52
21
60
160
D157
052071
68
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
1 1
2
20
0520
1 35
+00
3500
12
3
1
80
18
21
67
161
D161
050271
68
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2 1
1
25
0180
1 29
+00
3500
11
2
2
70
50
21
70
162
D101
051371
68
PONT
GTO
8
100
1 1
1
22
0800
1 32
+ 06
1000
13
2
1
70
50
21
10
163
D105
051371
68
VOLK
SEDA
1
091
1 1
2
11
0160
1 11
+09
2000
8
3
2
73
17
21
10
161
D099
051071
67
AMMO
RAMB
6
232
1 1
2
16
0510
1 32
+ 10
3000
10
3
2
72
52
21
11
165
D078
050871
67
BUI C
SPEC
8
310
1 1
1
21
0700
1 31
+15
3500
11
2
2
79
59
21
56
166
D125
051671
67
CADI
FLEE
8
129
1 1
1
26
0620
1 31
-01
5000
11
7
1
71
57
21
13
167
Dill
05H71
67
CHEV
IMPA
6
250
l 3
2
21
0810
1 33
-03
1000
12
0
2
81
53
21
31
168
D150
052071
67
CHEV
IMPA
8
283
2 1
2
21
0610
1 26
+06
1000
12
0
2
70
50
21
60
169
D175
052271
67
CHEV
MALI
8
283
2 1
2
20
0130
1 25
-10
3500
11
2
2
72
16
21
71
170
D021
012571
67
CHEV
IMPA
8
327
1 1
1
17
0580
Z 29
+03
1000
13
2
1
69
50
21
55
171
D120
051571
67
CHRY
NEWP
8
383
2 1
1
21
0710
1 31
+11
1000
13
2
1
68
18
21
50
172
D165
052171
67
DODG
CORO
8
318
2 1
1
19
0520
1 30
+10
3500
11
2
2
71
17
21
87
173
D176
052171
67
FORD
CUST
8
289
2 3
2
25
0690
1 30
+09
3500
11
2
2
79
52
21
69
171
D090
051071
67
FORD
MUST
8
289
2 1
2
20
0510
1 26
+ 12
3000
10
3
2
76
50
21
62
175
D031
012971
67
FORD
GALA
8
390
2 1
1
25
0610
1 27
+ 08
1000
13
2
1
69
50
21
90
176
D152
052071
67
MERC
MONT
8
390
2 1
1
20
0610
1 29
+00
1000
13
2
1
73
52
21
61
177
D158
052071
67
OLDS
DELM
8
125
2 1
1
25
0500
1 26
+08
1500
11.0
1
69
15
21
67
178
D095
051171
67
PLYM
VAL1
6
225
1 3
2
18
0620
1 10
+00
3000
10.3
2
70
50
21
27
179
DO89
051071
67
PONT
TEMP
8
326
2 1
1
19
0695
1 28
+11
3500
11
2
2
76
50
21
62
180
D102
050371
67
VOLK
SEDA
1
091
1 1
2
10
0820
1 51
+08
2000
8
3
2
72
16
21
19
101
-------
APPENDIX A
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
HOUSTON
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V
T
A
FT
I RPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS
INRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
001
HO61
031474
74
BUI C
LESA
8
455
4
1
1
26
0600
1 28
+08
1
4500
14.0
1
74
66
30.02
002
H155
032674
74
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
2
1
1
21
0520
1 29
+00
1
3500
11.2
2
74
63
30 21
003
H033
031274
74
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2
1
1
26
0580
1 31
+06
1
4000
13 2
1
82
70
30.09
004
H180
032874
74
DODG
CHAR
8
318
2
1
1
20
0580
1 29
+ 04
1
4000
13 2
1
82
62
29 84
005
H047
031374
74
FORD
TORI
8
302
2
1
1
26
0610
1 29
+02
1
4000
12 0
2
72
61
30 10
006
H054
031474
74
FORD
CUST
8
351
2
1
1
22
0650
1 27
+04
1
4500
14 0
1
68
63
30.07
007
H086
031874
74
OLDS
DELT
8
350
4
1
1
26
0640
1 31
+08
1
4500
14.0
1
78
70
29.93
008
H134
032274
74
PLYM
DUST
8
318
2
1
1
16
0660
1 37
+02
1
3500
12 3
1
76
57
30.20
009
H093
031874
74
PONT
CATA
8
400
2
1
1
26
0700
1 24
+14
1
4500
14 0
1
83
72
29.92
010
H022
030974
74
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
1250
1 48
-05
1
2250
8 8
2
72
69
30 07
Oil
H004
030674
73
AMMO
GREM
6
258
1
1
1
21
0670
1 32
+04
1
3000
11.3
1
82
68
30 07
012
H035
031274
73
BUI C
STAW
8
350
2
1
1
22
0710
1 30
+ 06
1
4500
14 0
1
83
71
30.09
013
H151
032o74
73
BUI C
ELEC
8
455
4
1
1
26
0720
1 27
+ 12
1
5000
14.7
1
73
62
30.15
Oil
H048
031374
73
CADI
DEVI
8
472
4
1
1
27
0650
1 29
+08
1
5500
15.3
1
68
60
30 10
015
H030
031174
73
CAPR
CAPR
4
122
2
1
1
12
0690
1 60
+ 10
1
2500
9.4
2
80
71
30 13
016
H080
031474
73
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
2
1
1
11
0610
1 34
+06
1
2500
9 4
2
77
70
30 03
017
H188
032874
73
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
2
1
1
11
0560
1 31
+12
1
2500
9.4
2
75
59
29 85
018
H178
032874
73
CHEV
CHEL
8
307
2
3
1
26
0900
1 30
+04
1
4000
12 0
2
81
72
29.96
019
H079
031674
73
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
1
1
21
0720
1 30
+06
1
3000
11 3
1
72
67
30 03
020
H097
031974
73
CHEV
MONT
8
350
2
1
1
19
0710
1 31
+08
1
4000
12 0
2
79
73
29 91
021
H012
030874
73
CHEV
CAMA
8
350
2
1
1
18
0620
1 31
+08
1,3
3500
12 3
1
80
72
30 09
022
H034
031274
73
CHEV
MALI
8
350
4
1
1
26
0500
1 27
+08
1
4000
13.2
1
80
70
30.08
023
H075
031474
73
CHEV
CAPR
8
400
2
1
1
17
0700
1 29
+ 12
1
4500
14.0
1
76
63
30 28
024
H116
032174
73
CHRY
NEWP
8
400
2
1
1
23
0650
1 37
-02
1
4500
14 0
1
74
54
30.20
025
H099
031974
73
DATS
DELU
4
071
2
1
1
10
1200
1 46
+ 10
1
2500
9 4
2
82
73
29 92
026
H147
032574
73
DODG
DART
6
225
1
1
1
16
0910
1 50
+ 12
1
3000
10 3
2
68
57
30.17
027
H064
031274
73
DODG
CHAR
8
318
2
1
1
18
0580
1 29
+ 06
1,3
4000
13.2
1
73
65
30 10
028
H092
031874
73
FORD
STAW
4
122
2
4
1
11
0820
1 40
+09
1
2750
9 9
2
80
70
29 94
029
H128
032174
73
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1
1
1
15
1300
1 34
+08
1
3000
10 3
2
76
57
30.15
030
H102
031974
73
FORD
MAVE
8
302
2
1
1
15
0550
1 25
+08
1
3000
11 3
1
78
70
29 91
031
H081
031674
73
FORD
MUST
8
351
2
1
1
20
0780
1 27
+06
1
3500
11 2
2
82
69
29 98
032
H006
030774
73
FORD
TORI
8
351
2
1
1
22
0760
1 30
+03
1,3
4000
13.2
1
76
70
30.08
033
H028
031174
73
FORD
LTD
8
400
2
1
1
21
0700
1 20
+ 12
1,3
4500
14.0
1
83
72
30.08
034
H118
032174
73
FORD
STAW
8
400
2
1
1
25
0600
1 29
+09
1
5000
14.7
1
76
55
30 19
035
H100
031974
73
MAZD
RX2
2
070
4
4
1
16
1000
1 60
+ 14
1
2750
? 9
2
74
69
29.89
036
H029
031174
73
MERC
MARQ
8
429
4
1
1
22
0640
1 25
+ 18
1
5000
14.7
1
73
69
30 00
037
H045
031374
73
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
4
1
1
22
0610
1 31
+04
1
4000
13.2
1
76
63
30.11
038
H070
031574
73
OLDS
DELT
8
455
4
1
1
26
0680
1 30
+06
1
4500
14 0
1
68
60
30.29
039
H105
032074
73
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2
1
1
19
0610
1 34
-01
1
4000
12.0
2
85
74
29.79
040
HI36
032274
73
PLYM
FURY
8
360
2
1
1
23
0740
1 30
+01
1
4000
13 2
1
72
57
30 25
041
H008
030974
73
PONT
VENT
8
350
2
1
1
21
0510
1 27
+08
1
3500
12.3
1
75
69
30.07
042
H019
030974
73
PONT
BONN
8
400
2
1
1
26
0610
1 28
+05
1,3
4500
14.0
1
80
72
30.11
043
H107
032074
73
TOYO
CORO
4
120
2
4
1
13
0800
1 52
+00
1
2750
9.9
2
74
60
29 97
044
H197
032974
73
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
0800
1 60
+ 10
1
2250
8 8
2
81
64
29 86
045
H091
031974
73
VOLK
STAW
4
103
2
4
1
15
0900
1 52
+ 10
1
3000
10.3
2
75
70
29 93
046
H017
030874
72
BUI C
LESA
8
350
4
1
1
19
0610
1 30
+02
1
4500
14 0
1
76
70
30 14
047
H066
031574
72
BUIC
ELEC
8
455
4
1
1
24
0650
1 32
+06
1
5000
14.7
1
68
62
30 18
048
H177
032874
72
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
2
4
1
11
1200
1 32
+04
1
2500
9.4
2
81
72
29 96
049
H179
032874
72
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
2
3
1
11
1100
1 56
+08
1
2500
9.4
2
77
69
29.90
050
H026
031174
72
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
1
1
16
0530
1 20
+04
1
3500
11 2
2
80
71
30.03
051
H049
031374
72
CHEV
MONT
8
350
2
1
1
19
0600
1 29
+ 00
1
4000
13 2
1
70
61
30 10
052
H094
031974
72
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
2
1
1
16
0600
1 30
-06
1
3500
12.3
1
81
72
29.87
053
H141
032374
72
CHEV
STAW
8
350
4
1
1
18
0620
1 31
+08
1
4000
13.2
1
84
62
30.24
054
H039
031274
72
CHEV
IMPA
8
400
2
l
1
24
0500
1 31
+08
1
4500
14.0
1
76
62
30.16
055
Hl6"3
032774
72
DATS
STAW
4
097
2
4
1
11
1160
1 46
+10
1
2500
9.4
2
82
69
30.16
056
H077
031274
72
DODG
DART
8
313
2
1
1
16
0520
1 29
+08
1
3000
10.3
2
84
64
30 24
057
H159
032874
72
DODG
POLA
8
360
2
1
1
23
0740
1 31
+03
1
4000
13.2
1
72
62
30.23
058
H112
032074
72
FORD
PINT
4
122
2
4
1
11
0840
1 34
+00
1
2500
9.4
2
72
56
30.24
059
H007
030774
72
FORD
TORI
8
302
2
1
1
22
0680
1 32
+02
1
4000
12.0
2
80
70
30.07
060
H038
031374
72
FORD
GALA
8
351
2
1
1
21
0570
1 27
+06
1
4000
12.0
2
70
60
30.11
10
-------
APPENDIX A,CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
HOUSTON
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V T
A FT
1 RPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS
I NRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
061
H125
032271
72
FORD
GRAN
8
351
2 1
1 20
0580
1 26
+06
1
1000
13
2
1
81
68
29
91
062
H036
031271
72
FORD
STAW
8
100
2 1
1 21
0600
1 29
+03
1
1500
11
0
1
80
78
30
09
063
H121
032171
72
FORD
LTD8
8
129
1 1
1 21
0590
1 30
+07
1
1500
11
0
1
69
52
30
13
061
H095
031971
72
LINC
MRK 1
8
160
1 1
1 22
0590
1 31
+ 06
1
5000
11
7
1
81
73
29
90
065
H072
031571
72
MERC
STAW
8
100
2 1
1 21
0520
1 30
+ 01
1
5000
11
7
1
82
61
30
26
066
H110
032071
72
OLDS
DELT
8
350
2 1
1 25
0700
1 30
+00
1
1500
11
0
1
70
56
30
19
067
H161
032771
72
OLDS
STAW
8
155
1 1
1 23
0610
1 30
+08
1
1500
11
0
1
73
65
30
17
068
H115
03217''
72
OPEL
STAW
1
116
2 1
1 11
0610
1 56
+06
1
2500
9
1
2
75
55
30
16
069
H123
032271
72
PLYM
VAL I
6
225
1 1
1 16
0790
1 11
+06
1
3000
10
3
2
78
61
29
95
070
Hl16
032571
72
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2 1
1 21
0850
1 32
+ 00
1
3500
12
3
1
69
58
30
25
071
H130
032271
72
PONT
VENT
8
350
2 1
1 16
0580
1 29
+ 12
1
3500
12
3
1
76
57
30
21
072
Hill
032571
72
PONT
BONN
8
155
1 1
1 25
0610
1 27
+ 12
1
1500
11
0
1
81
61
30
27
073
H081
031871
72
TOYO
CAR 1
1
097
2 1
1 11
0600
1 19
+ 00
1
2250
8
8
2
79
69
29
92
071
H132
032371
72
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
2 11
1120
1 50
+00
1
2250
8
8
2
78
58
30
21
075
H122
032271
72
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
1 11
1200
1 11
+00
1
2250
8
8
2
69
62
29
95
076
H101
031971
71
AMMO
JAVE
8
301
2 1
1 16
0700
1 30
+ 08
3500
11
2
2
85
72
29
87
077
H071
031671
71
BUI C
SKY L
8
350
2 1
1 19
0510
1 29
+08
3500
12
3
1
71
61
30
28
078
H101
031971
71
BUI C
ELEC
8
155
1 1
1 21
0600
1 31
+01
1500
11
0
1
76
71
29
90
079
H073
031671
71
CADI
SEDA
8
172
1 1
1 27
0810
1 26
+01
5000
11
7
1
68
58
30
28
080
H151
032671
71
CHEV
VEGA
1
110
1 3
1 11
0680
1 33
+ 01
2500
9
1
2
73
62
30
23
081
H198
032971
71
CHEV
MAL I
8
307
2 1
1 21
0600
1 29
+08
3500
11
2
2
81
68
29
76
082
H103
031971
71
CHEV
I MPA
8
350
2 1
1 21
0500
1 30
+00
1000
12
0
2
81
71
29
92
083
H010
030771
71
CHEV
I MPA
8
350
2 1
1 21
0590
1 30
+09
3
1000
13
2
1
78
69
30
11
081
H195
032971
71
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2 1
1 21
0550
1 25
+06
3500
12
3
1
80
60
29
98
085
H115
032571
71
CHEV
1 MPA
8
100
2 1
1 21
0620
1 27
+ 12
1000
13
2
1
70
56
30
18
086
H076
031671
71
CHRY
300
8
110
1 1
1 23
0560
1 31
-02
1500
11
0
1
82
61
30
28
087
H156
03227t
71
DATS
Z110
1
071
2 1
1 10
1200
1 58
+ 10
2000
8
3
2
75
63
30
20
088
Hill
032071
71
DODG
CHAR
8
318
2 1
1 21
0580
1 30
+05
3500
12
3
1
70
55
30
23
089
H113
032071
71
FORD
PINT
1
122
2 1
1 11
0810
1 18
+ 06
2250
8
8
2
70
51
30
19
090
H098
031971
71
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1 1
1 15
0180
1 36
+03
2750
9
9
2
78
72
29
92
091
ho89
031871
71
FORD
TOR I
8
302
2 1
1 20
0610
1 31
-06
3500
11
2
2
70
56
30
08
092
H016
030871
71
FORD
GALA
8
351
2 1
1 23
0590
1 33
+01
3
1000
13
2
1
76
70
30
13
093
H109
031971
71
FORD
BROU
8
129
1 1
1 23
0610
1 30
+ 10
3
1500
11
0
1
70
56
30
05
091
H133
032371
71
MERC
MONT
8
100
2 1
1 22
0720
1 31
+ 06
1500
11
0
1
78
58
30
21
095
H096
031971
71
OLDS
STAW
8
350
1 1
1 23
0580
1 31
¦1O8
1000
13
2
1
80
72
29
90
096
H021
030971
71
OLDS
98
8
155
1 1
1 26
0610
1 30
+ 01
3
5000
11
7
1
78
72
30
10
097
H158
032371
71
PLYM
DUST
6
225
1 1
1 17
0710
l 39
+ 01
3000
10
3
2
70
63
30
23
098
H002
030671
71
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2 1
1 21
0660
1 31
-01
3
3500
12
3
1
75
69
30
06
099
H013
031371
71
PONT
LEMA
8
350
2 1
1 19
0510
1 29
+ 00
3500
12
3
1
75
63
30
10
100
H187
032971
71
PONT
GRNP
8
100
1 1
1 19
0680
1 29
+ 10
1000
13
2
1
75
59
29
80
101
Hl81
032971
71
TOYO
CORO
1
071
2 1
1 12
1000
1 10
+ 06
2000
8
3
2
80
62
29
90
102
H018
03087I
71
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1 1
2 11
1010
1 50
+07
2250
8
8
2
80
71
30
11
103
H090
031871
70
BUIC
ELEC
8
155
1 1
1 20
0550
1 30
+06
1500
11
0
1
72
69
29
90
lOl
H055
03H71
70
CHEV
CHEV
6
250
1 3
1 20
0910
1 37
107
3500
11
2
2
68
63
30
07
105
H175
032771
70
CHEV
CAMA
8
307
2 1
1 19
0190
1 29
+08
3500
11
2
2
76
69
30
03
106
Hl9'i
03297^
70
CHEV
I MPA
8
350
2 1
1 17
0620
1 31
+08
1000
12
0
2
76
56
29
98
107
HO63
031171
70
CHEV
I MPA
8
350
2 1
1 17
0610
1 28
+ 00
1000
13
2
1
72
65
30
08
108
H191
032971
70
CHEV
BELA
8
350
2 1
1 25
0610
1 36
+ 01
1000
13
2
1
69
50
30
03
109
H131
032371
70
CHEV
STAW
8
100
2 1
1 22
0680
1 31
+ 01
1500
11
0
1
77
57
30
21
110
HOlO
031271
70
DODG
POLA
8
383
2 1
1 21
0500
1 32
+ 02
1000
13
2
1
70
62
30
39
111
HOll
031371
70
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1 3
1 16
0700
1 38
+02
2750
9
9
2
75
63
30
10
112
Hl66
032771
70
FORD
FAIR
8
302
2 3
1 20
0900
1 32
+ 00
3500
11
2
2
71
66
30
16
113
H071
031371
70
FORD
CUST
8
351
2 1
1 21
0500
1 35
+06
1000
12
0
2
75
62
30
29
111
H193
03297I
70
FORD
MUST
8
351
2 1
1 20
0500
1 32
+06
3000
11
3
1
71
58
29
98
115
H050
031371
70
FORD
STAW
8
390
2 1
1 21
0500
1 27
+ 05
1500
11
0
1
68
56
30
15
116
H085
031571
70
MERC
MARQ
8
129
2 1
1 21
0560
1 33
+ 02
1500
11
0
1
78
70
29
92
117
H129
03227I
70
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2 1
1 23
0610
1 30
+01
1000
13
2
1
71
56
30
21
118
H192
032971
70
OLDS
DETL
8
155
2 1
1 25
0550
1 30
+08
1500
11
0
1
69
55
30
00
119
H009
030771
70
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
1 25
0190
1 37
+ 07
1000
13
2
1
76
70
30
10
120
H016
031371
70
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
1 21
0590
1 29
+ 08
1000
12
0
2
76
63
30
11
-------
APPENDIX A,CONT'D
LISTJNG OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
HOUSTON
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V T
A FT
IRPM P
DW
IGN
TESTS
INRT
RLHP
L
08
WB
BAROM
121
H186
032874
70
PONT
FIRE
8
350
2 1
1 19
0680 1
28
+ 12
3500
12.3
1
79
61
29.91
122
H160
032674
70
PONT
CATA
8
400
2 1
1 26
0710 1
35
+ 04
4500
14.0
1
70
62
30 23
123
H176
032874
70
TOYO
STAW
4
116
2 1
1 12
0920 1
56
+ 00
2500
9.4
2
82
72
29.92
124
H162
032774
70
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1 4
2 10
1160 1
54
-10
2000
8.3
2
83
70
30.14
125
H167
032774
69
AMMO
JAVE
8
290
2 1
1 19
0540 1
27
+05
3000
11.3
1
73
66
30.10
126
H142
032374
69
BU1C
SKYL
8
350
2 1
1 20
0650 1
31
+ 04
3500
12.3
1
78
59
30.26
127
H170
032774
69
CHEV
CAMA
6
250
1 1
1 18
0610 1
26
+ 06
3500
11.2
2
70
65
30.09
126
H062
031474
69
CHEV
STAW
8
307
2 1
1 18
0560 1
31
+ 03
4000
12.0
2
72
65
30 08
129
H150
032674
69
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2 1
1 18
0720 1
25
+ 10
3000
10.3
2
73
62
30 16
130
H025
030974
69
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
4 1
1 25
0590 1
30
+ 04
4000
12.0
2
74
72
30 06
131
H015
030874
69
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
4 1
1 23
0450 1
35
+ 00
3
4000
13.2
1
74
69
30.07
132
H120
032174
69
CHEV
STAW
8
396
2 1
1 24
0540 1
19
-11
4500
14.0
1
72
55
30 03
133
H023
030974
69
CHRY
TOWN
8
383
2 1
1 23
0600 1
32
+ 07
3
5000
14.7
1
74
70
30 00
131
H167
032774
69
DODG
DART
6
225
2 1
1 18
0630 1
40
+ 00
3000
10.3
2
72
64
30.14
135
H053
031374
69
FORD
STAW
8
302
2 1
1 24
0400 1
33
+ 05
4500
12.7
2
69
65
30 04
136
H069
031674
69
FORD
MUST
8
302
2 1
1 20
0610 1
27
+ 08
3500
11 2
2
70
60
30.24
137
H174
032774
69
FORD
MUST
8
351
4 1
1 20
0560 1
32
+08
3000
10.3
2
76
69
30 10
138
H199
032974
69
FORD
STAW
8
351
4 1
1 19
0680 1
27
+06
4000
13.2
1
83
68
29.75
139
H005
030774
69
FORD
STAW
8
390
2 1
1 23
0560 1
29
+ 00
3
4500
14 0
1
80
72
30.06
140
H024
030974
69
MERC
MONT
8
390
2 1
1 21
0510 1
31
+06
3
5000
14 .7
1
82
73
30 09
111
HOll
030774
69
OLDS
DELT
8
455
2 1
1 21
0610 1
30
+05
3
4500
14.0
1
84
70
30.13
112
H087
031874
69
PLYM
BARR
8
318
2 1
1 18
0620 1
29
+ 04
3000
10 3
2
79
71
29.94
113
H169
032774
69
PONT
LEMA
8
350
2 1
1 21
0530 1
33
+ 04
3500
12.3
1
68
63
30 09
144
H032
031174
69
PONT
CATA
8
400
4 1
1 26
0510 1
22
+ 15
4500
14 0
1
86
72
30 09
145
H181
032B74
69
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1 4
2 11
1000 1
54
+00
2250
8 8
2
85
66
29 79
li)6
H153
032674
68
AMMO
RAMB
6
199
1 3
1 16
0560 1
20
+ 04
3000
10 3
2
76
63
30.22
117
H117
032174
68
BUI C
ELEC
8
430
4 1
1 21
0650 1
27
+00
4500
14.0
1
77
56
30 20
148
H07B
031674
68
CADI
DEVI
8
472
4 1
1 24
0520 1
29
+08
5000
14 7
1
70
66
30 03
149
H052
031374
68
CHEV
CAMA
6
230
1 1
2 18
0450 1
22
+05
35T30
11 2
2
69
65
30.14
150
H182
032874
68
CHEV
BELA
8
307
2 1
1 25
0560 1
26
+02
4000
12 0
2
81
64
29 80
151
H137
032274
68
CHEV
BELA
8
327
4 1
1 22
0600 1
32
+07
4500
12.7
2
69
56
30 29
152
H202
032974
68
CHEV
MAL I
8
307
2 1
1 20
0500 1
31
+ 06
3500
11.2
2
78
68
29.74
153
H152
032574
68
CHEV
CAPR
8
396
4 1
1 25
0660 1
29
+ 08
4500
14 0
1
75
63
30.21
15«
H119
032174
68
DODG
POLA
8
383
2 1
1 24
0490 1
31
+ 04
4000
13 2
1
71
54
30 16
155
H126
032174
68
FORD
MUST
6
200
1 1
1 20
0610 1
35
+ 14
3000
10.3
2
70
58
30 13
156
H183
032874
68
FORD
MUST
8
289
2 1
1 20
0560 1
28
+ 06
3500
11.2
2
77
61
29 80
157
H083
031474
68
FORD
FA I R
8
302
2 1
1 20
0630 1
28
+ 06
3500
11.2
2
82
70
29.92
158
H135
032274
68
FORD
STAW
8
390
2 1
1 24
0590 1
24
+ 07
4500
14.0
1
69
54
30.20
159
H189
032874
68
MERC
STAW
8
390
2 1
1 22
0520 1
21
+06
4500
14.0
1
73
58
29-86
160
H148
032574
68
OLDS
CUTS
8
350
2 1
1 20
0655 1
29
+ 09
3500
12.3
1
70
58
30.25
161
H001
030674
68
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2 1
1 25
0450 1
30
-05
3500
11 2
2
77
70
30.05
162
H201
032974
68
PONT
CATA
8
400
2 1
1 20
0500 1
30
+ 10
4000
13.2
1
83
68
29.75
163
H143
032374
68
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1 4
2 11
0920 1
58
+04
2000
8 3
2
74
58
30.26
164
H127
032174
67
AMMO
REBE
6
232
2 1
1 21
0510 1
35
+07
3500
11 2
2
69
55
30.16
165
H106
032074
67
BUIC
LESA
8
340
4 1
1 24
0580 1
36
-06
4000
12.0
2
78
64
29.90
166
H149
032574
67
CADI
DEVI
8
429
4 1
1 26
0630 1
35
+ 10
5000
14 7
1
72
56
30.17
167
H173
032774
67
CHEV
CHEL
6
250
1 3
2 20
0730 1
24
+ 04
3000
10.3
2
73
66
30 10
168
H171
032774
67
CHEV
IMPA
8
283
2 1
1 24
0420 1
33
+ 10
4000
12.0
2
71
66
30.09
169
H190
032874
67
CHEV
BISC
8
283
2 1
1 24
0600 1
20
+ 10
4000
12 0
2
69
58
29 90
170
H014
030874
67
CHEV
CAPR
8
327
4 1
1 20
0580 1
22
+ 12
3
4000
13 2
1
80
70
30 08
171
HO 27
031174
67
CHRY
NEWP
8
383
2 1
1 24
0600 1
30
+ 06
3
4000
13.2
1
79
71
30.06
172
Hll4
032074
67
DODG
CORO
8
318
2 1
1 19
0810 1
30
+ 09
3500
11 2
2
73
57
30.17
173
H165
032774
67
FORD
CUST
8
289
2 1
1 25
0500 1
28
-02
4000
12.0
2
71
65
30.16
174
H172
032774
67
FORD
MUST
8
289
2 1
1 20
0600 1
27
+06
3000
10.3
2
72
66
30 09
175
H031
031174
67
FORD
LTD
8
390
4 1
1 24
0590 1
35
+07
3
3500
12 3
1
82
72
30 15
176
H037
031274
67
MERC
STAW
8
428
4 1
1 17
0630 1
28
-04
3
4500
14.0
1
77
63
30.12
177
H003
030674
67
OLDS
98
8
425
4 1
1 24
0645 1
27
+ 11
3
4500
14.0
1
82
69
30.12
178
H124
032274
67
PLYM
BARR
6
225
1 3
1 18
0750 1
30
+09
3000
10.3
2
84
68
29 91
179
H108
032074
67
PONT
LEMA
8
326
2 1
1 19
0570 1
30
+ 06
3500
11.2
2
70
56
29 99
180
H185
032974
67
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1 4
2 11
0960 1
44
+ 10
2000
8.3
2
82
62
29 89
10*t
-------
APPENDIX A
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DETROIT
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V
T
A
FT
I RPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS
I NRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
001
D030
061371)
71
BUIC
ELEC
8
155
1
1
1
26
0610
1 31
+ 12
1
3
5000
11
7
1
70
60
29
36
002
M101
070171
71
CHEV
MONT
8
loo
2
1
1
26
0610
1 31
+ 12
1000
13
2
1
72
59
29
30
003
M060
062171
71
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2
1
1
26
0680
1 29
+ 08
1
3
1500
11
0
1
77
70
29
01
001)
M183
071371
71
DODG
DART
8
318
2
1
1
16
0580
1 29
+ 07
3500
12
3
1
70
61
29
10
005
M103
070171
71
FORD
TORI
8
302
2
1
2
22
0620
1 30
+ 10
1000
12
0
2
78
70
29
30
006
M106
070171
71
FORD
LTD
8
351
2
1
1
22
0180
1 36
+ 12
1500
11
0
1
78
70
29
27
007
M0l)2
061771
71
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
1
1
1
22
0610
1 27
+ 10
1
3
1000
13
2
1
70
58
29
30
008
M0l)6
061871
71
plym
SATE
8
318
2
1
1
19
0520
1 36
-02
1
3
1000
13
2
1
70
60
29
10
009
M056
061971
71
PONT
BONN
8
100
2
1
1
26
0680
1 30
+ 10
1
3
1500
11
0
1
71
60
29
30
010
M1H2
070871
71
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1
1
2
11
1000
1 52
+ 10
2250
8
8
2
78
70
29
10
Oil
M095
062971
73
AMMO
HORN
6
258
1
1
1
16
0560
1 30
+ 00
3500
12
3
1
70
58
29
10
012
D019
061071
73
BUIC
LESA
8
350
2
1
2
26
0580
1 27
+ 06
1500
11
0
1
70
62
29
29
013
M018
061871
73
BUIC
L I MI
8
155
1
1
1
26
0680
1 30
+ 06
5000
11
7
1
78
66
29
29
Oil
M051
061971
73
CADI
DEVI
8
172
1
1
1
27
0700
1 28
+ 12
5500
15
3
1
75
67
29
31
015
M165
071071
73
CAPR
SEDA
ii
122
2
1
2
12
1020
1 51
+ 11
2500
9
1
2
73
57
29
59
016
MO99
070Z71
73
CHEV
STAW
1
110
2
1
2
11
0800
1 31
-08
2750
9
9
2
82
62
29
29
017
M167
071171
73
CHEV
CAMA
6
250
1
1
2
18
0650
1 31
+ 08
3500
11
2
2
70
58
29
60
018
M119
070171
73
CHEV
CHEV
8
307
2
1
1
22
0550
1 26
+ 12
3500
11
2
2
76
66
29
31
019
D021
061071
73
CHEV
MONT
8
350
2
1
1
22
0610
1 28
+ 10
1000
13
2
1
75
57
29
29
020
MOUt
061771
73
CHEV
CHEV
8
350
2
1
1
26
0670
1 25
+ 12
1
6
1000
12
0
2
82
61
29
26
021
D007
060671
73
CHEV
LAGU
8
350
2
1
2
22
0760
1 28
+ 08
1000
13
2
1
72
61
29
39
022
D003
060571
73
CHEV
MONT
8
350
1
1
1
22
0530
1 32
+ 10
1
6
1000
13
2
1
72
60
29
18
023
D020
061071
73
CHEV
CAPR
8
100
2
1
1
26
0620
1 29
+ 10
1
3
1500
]1
0
1
77
60
29
27
021
M177
071271
73
CHRY
NEWY
8
100
1
1
1
23
0570
1 38
+ 07
1500
11
0
1
70
60
29
58
025
M178
071371
73
DATS
SEDA
6
116
2
1
1
11
0710
1 30
+ 10
2750
9
9
2
81
72
29
17
026
MOlO
061571
73
DODG
DART
6
225
1
1
1
16
0780
1 36
+ 01
3000
10
3
2
78
60
29
16
027
Mill
070271
73
DODG
DART
8
318
2
1
2
16
0600
1 38
+ 02
3000
11
3
1
83
73
29
11
028
M052
061971
73
FORD
PINT
1
122
2
1
2
11
0630
1 50
+ 06
2500
9
1
2
75
68
29
33
029
M162
071171
73
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1
3
2
15
0860
1 29
+ 01
3000
10
3
2
76
59
29
55
030
M190
071571
73
FORD
MUST
8
302
2
1
2
19
0670
1 30
+ 06
3500
12
3
1
76
60
29
19
031
M051
061971
73
FORD
LTD
8
351
2
1
2
22
0680
1 25
+ 10
1500
12
7
2
76
61
29
38
032
D015
060871
73
FORD
MUST
8
351
2
1
1
19
0600
1 36
+ 09
1
3
3500
12
3
1
70
62
29
32
033
D001
060171
73
FORD
STAW
8
loo
2
1
1
21
0120
1 31
+ 09
1
6
5000
11
7
1
71
61
29
18
031
D001
060571
73
FORD
LTD
8
100
2
1
1
22
0580
1 38
+ 12
1
6
1500
11
0
1
78
67
29
37
035
M093
062971
73
MAZD
SEDA
2
070
1
1
2
17
0610
1 60
+ 00
2750
9
Q
2
71
62
29
10
036
D026
061271
73
MERC
MARQ
8
129
1
1
1
22
0610
1 21
+ 11
1
3
5000
11
7
1
7"
58
29
33
037
M170
071271
73
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
1
1
1
22
0695
1 27
+ 12
1000
13
2
1
78
61
29
58
038
D008
060671
73
OLDS
98
8
1)55
1
1
1
26
0600
1 30
+ 08
1
6
5000
11
7
1
76
66
29
29
039
MI69
071271
73
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2
1
1
23
0730
1 37
+ 01
1000
12
0
2
76
61
29
58
010
D016
060871
73
PLYM
FURY
8
360
2
1
1
23
0660
1 38
+ 05
1
6
1000
13
2
1
76
65
29
02
01)1
M113
070371
73
PONT
VENT
8
350
2
1
1
21
0520
1 29
+ 08
3500
12
3
1
71
68
29
32
01)2
D010
060771
73
PONT
GRNA
8
100
2
1
1
25
0510
1 27
+ 12
1
3
1500
11
0
1
77
66
29
21
013
M189
071171
73
TOYO
CELI
1
120
2
1
2
13
0720
1 18
+ 09
2500
9
1
2
77
66
29
30
Ol)D
M122
070171
73
VOLK
SEDA
1
097
1
1
2
11
1010
1 52
+ 10
2000
8
3
2
71
59
29
32
015
M151)
071071
73
VOLK
SEDA
1
103
0
1
2
11
0965
1 16
+ 27
2750
9
9
2
71
61
29
13
0l)6
M019
06187I
72
BUIC
LESA
8
350
2
1
1
21
0180
1 30
+ 02
1
3
1500
11
0
1
80
68
29
30
01)7
M115
070371
72
BUIC
CENT
8
155
1
1
1
21
0560
1 26
+ 01
1500
11
0
1
81
72
29
30
0D8
M121)
070371
72
CHEV
VEGA
1
110
2
1
2
11
0610
1 38
-02
2500
9
1
2
83
65
29
17
01)9
MO 72
062171
72
CHEV
NOVA
6
250
1
1
2
16
0670
1 29
+ 08
3000
10
3
2
75
58
29
10
050
M185
071371
72
CHEV
MALI
8
307
2
1
2
19
0560
1 31
+ 06
3500
11
2
2
80
71
29
10
051
M037
061171
72
CHEV
STAW
8
350
2
1
1
23
0800
1 28
+ 08
1
3
5000
11
7
1
76
60
29
31
052
D006
060671
72
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2
1
2
21
0620
1 30
+ 08
1
6
1500
11
0
1
75
65
29
31
053
M120
070171
72
CHEV
STAW
8
350
2
1
1
18
0600
1 27
+ 12
1000
13
2
1
70
58
29
31
051
DO 12
060771
72
CHEV
CAPR
8
100
2
1
1
21
0600
1 28
+ 10
1
6
1500
11
0
1
78
68
29
30
055
M117
070971
72
DATS
SEDA
i)
097
2
1
2
11
0660
1 51
-05
2500
9
1
2
80
70
29
31
056
M123
070171
72
DODG
DART
8
318
2
1
1
16
0510
1 26
+ 11
3000
10
3
2
76
61
29
19
057
DO 11)
060871
72
DODG
POLA
8
360
2
1
1
23
0560
1 31
+ 08
1
6
1000
13
2
1
78
72
29
31
058
M109
070271
72
FORD
PINT
1
122
2
1
2
11
0880
1 10
+ 12
2500
9
1
2
75
70
29
28
059
M118
070171
72
FORD
TORI
8
302
2
1
1
22
0700
1 35
+ 09
3500
11
2
2
78
68
29
30
060
M135
070671
72
FORD
LTD
8
351
2
1
2
22
0580
1 31
+ 06
1500
12
7
2
73
61
29
51
105
-------
APPENDIX A,CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DETROIT
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V
T
A
FT
IRPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS
INRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
061
M059
062074
72
FORD
GALA
8
351
2
1
1
22
0520
1 28
+04
1,3
4000
13
2
1
78
69
29 04
062
D011
06077
72
FORD
STAW
8
400
2
1
1
21
0600
1 29
+ 14
1,6
4500
14
.0
1
72
66
29 22
063
M092
062874
72
FORD
THUN
8
429
4
1
1
23
0480
1 28
+ 04
1
4500
14
0
1
80
64
29.10
064
M075
062574
72
LINC
CONT
8
460
4
1
1
22
0640
1 25
-01
1
5500
15
.3
1
72
59
29.45
065
D018
061074
72
MERC
MONT
8
400
2
1
2
22
0620
1 34
+ 04
1,6
4500
14
0
1
72
66
29.30
066
M063
062174
72
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2
1
1
20
0560
1 30
+ 04
1,3
3500
12
3
1
75
63
29.15
067
D025
061174
72
OLDS
98
8
455
4
1
1
25
0620
1 32
+04
1,6
4500
14
0
1
80
59
29.36
068
M139
070874
72
OPEL
SEDA
4
116
2
1
2
11
0830
1 44
+ 10
1
2500
9
4
2
80
70
29.43
069
M108
070274
72
PLYM
VAL I
6
225
1
1
1
16
0580
1 34
+05
1
3000
10
3
2
73
69
29.28
070
M105
070174
72
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2
1
1
23
0690
1 37
+03
1
4000
13
2
1
83
70
29-36
071
MllO
070274
72
PONT
CATA
8
350
2
1
2
25
0700
1 31
+ 12
1
4500
14
0
1
80
72
29. 40
072
M136
073674
72
PONT
BONN
8
455
2
1
1
25
0580
1 34
+ 06
1
4500
14
0
1
77
67
29 51
073
M085
062774
72
TOYO
CORO
4
097
2
4
2
12
0820
1 54
+05
1
2250
8
8
2
78
63
29 54
07"
M098
062974
72
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
1040
1 44
+02
1
2250
8
8
2
83
62
29.26
075
M097
062974
72
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
1
2
11
1020
1 58
+ 10
1
2250
8
8
2
72
60
29 23
076
M039
061574
71
AMMO
STAW
8
304
2
1
1
17
0680
1 28
+03
4000
12
0
2
76
60
29.15
077
M116
070274
71
BUIC
LESA
8
350
2
1
1
24
0540
1 34
+ 06
4500
14
0
1
80
70
29.29
078
D028
061274
71
BUIC
ELEC
8
455
4
1
1
24
0630
1 29
+ 16
6
4500
14
0
1
78
58
29 37
079
M117
070474
71
CADI
DEVI
8
472
4
1
1
27
0900
1 27
+ 12
5000
14
7
1
78
68
29 30
080
M131
070674
71
CHEV
VEGA
4
140
1
3
2
11
1200
1 54
+ 10
2500
9
4
2
72
64
29.51
081
Mill
070474
71
CHEV
MALI
8
307
2
1
2
19
0560
1 28
+ 12
3500
11
2
2
78
70
29 32
082
M151
070974
71
CHEV
MONT
8
350
4
1
1
19
0560
1 30
+ 04
4000
12
0
2
76
70
29. 30
O83
D009
060674
71
CHEV
STAW
8
350
2
1
1
23
0550
1 40
+ 12
3
5000
14
7
1
78
67
29 28
084
M113
070874
71
CHEV
MALI
8
350
4
1
2
19
0420
1 29
-02
3500
12
3
1
75
68
29 40
085
D065
062274
71
CHEV
I MP A
8
400
2
1
1
24
0860
1 27
+ 12
6
4000
13
2
1
72
e4
29 42
086
M041
061174
71
CHRY
300
8
440
4
1
1
23
0630
1 37
+ 02
4500
14
0
1
75
60
29 29
087
M158
071074
71
DATS
SEDA
4
071
2
4
2
10
0920
1 58
+ 15
2000
8
3
2
70
58
29. 42
088
M068
062474
71
DODG
CHAR
8
318
2
1
2
21
0680
1 32
+ 10
6
3500
12
3
1
70
61
29.62
089
M017
061874
71
FORD
PINT
4
122
2
4
2
11
0800
1 38
+03
2250
8
8
2
78
64
29.28
090
M03IJ
061374
71
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1
1
2
15
0590
1 37
+09
2750
9
9
2
70
62
29.38
091
M082
062674
71
FORD
TORI
8
302
2
1
2
20
0630
1 29
+ 07
6
3500
11
2
2
70
60
29 55
092
M033
061474
71
FORD
LTD
8
351
2
1
1
23
0610
1 33
+03.
3
4500
14
0
1
70
60
29. 38
093
M180
071374
71
FORD
LTD
8
400
2
1
1
23
0620
1 26
+05
4000
13
2
1
81
69
29 45
091
M079
062674
71
MERC
MONT
8
400
2
1
1
22
0610
1 29
+ 24
6
4500
14
0
1
70
58
24 . 40
095
M128
070274
71
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
4
1
1
20
0570
1 29
+ 12
3500
12
3
1
73
62
29 50
096
D027
061074
71
OLDS
DELT
8
455
2
1
1
23
0660
1 28
+ 10
3
4500
14
0
1
70
57
29.33
097
M121
070474
71
PLYM
VAL I
6
225
1
1
2
17
0480
1 40
+ 06
3000
10
3
2
70
58
29.31
098
D024
061174
71
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2
1
1
21
0720
1 30
+ 05
3
3500
12
3
1
74
59
29 33
099
M132
070674
71
PONT
FIRE
8
350
2
1
2
17
0560
1 31
+ 10
3500
12
3
1
78
66
29.51
100
D029
061374
71
PONT
GTO
8
400
4
1
1
20
0610
1 29
+ 12
6
4000
13
2
1
71
58
29 38
101
M149
070974
71
TOYO
CORO
4
097
2
1
1
12
0520
1 54
+ 06
2000
8
3
2
77
69
29.30
102
M131
070674
71
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
0920
1 48
+ 05
2250
8
8
2
79
65
29.52
103
M100
070174
70
BUIC
STAW
8
455
4
1
1
24
0600
1 29
+05
5000
14
7
1
72
61
29.29
104
M107
070274
70
CHEV
NOVA
6
250
1
1
2
18
0710
1 34
+ 04
3000
10
3
2
75
68
29.29
105
M182
071374
70
CHEV
NOVA
8
307
2
1
2
18
0600
1 32
+06
3500
11
2
2
80
69
29.40
106
M144
070874
70
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
2
1
2
25
0460
1 28
-06
4000
12
0
2
81
71
29.40
107
M043
061774
70
CHEV
MONT
8
350
2
1
2
18
0590
1 27
-03
6
4000
13
2
1
77
62
29.22
108
M083
062774
70
CHEV
IMPA
8
350
4
1
1
25
0540
1 19
+ 18
6
4000
13
2
1
70
58
29.53
109
M148
070974
70
CHEV
CAPR
8
400
2
1
1
25
0530
1 29
+05
4000
13
2
1
80
70
29.23
110
M102
070174
70
DODG
POLA
8
383
2
1
1
24
0570
1 34
+ 00
4000
13
2
1
70
58
29-30
111
M055
061974
70
FORD
MAVE
6
200
1
1
2
16
0600
1 32
+ 10
2750
9
9
2
82
65
29.35
112
M175
071274
70
FORD
FAIR
8
302
2
1
2
20
0600
1 31
+ 07
3500
11
2
2
70
59
29.57
113
Ml4l
070874
70
FORD
GALA
8
351
2
1
2
24
0560
1 32
+05
4000
12
0
2
74
66
29 41
111
M032
061474
70
FORD
LTD
8
351
2
1
2
24
0560
1 29
+05
6
4000
13
2
1
72
62
29.41
115
M038
061574
70
FORD
LTD
8
390
2
1
2
23
0560
1 31
+09
6
4000
13
2
1
70
58
29.34
116
D031
061274
70
MERC
MARA
8
429
4
1
1
24
0480
1 32
+ 12
6
4500
14
0
1
74
60
29.43
11"
M184
071374
70
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2
1
1
20
0630
1 31
+ 12
3500
12
3
1
80
70
29.40
118
M078
062674
70
OLDS
98
8
455
4
1
1
25
0570
1 29
+ 08
6
4500
14.
0
1
70
58
29.41
119
M179
071374
70
PLYM
SATE
8
318
2
1
2
19
0610
1 32
+ 02
3500
12
3
1
80
70
29.45
120
M050
061974
70
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2
1
1
19
0560
1 27
+ 05
4000
12.
0
2
74
68
29.34
106
-------
APPENDIX A,CONT'D
LISTING OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
DETROIT
VEH
RUN
DATE
YR
MAKE
MODL
C
CID
V
T
A
FT
IRPM
P DW
IGN
TESTS
I NRT
RLHP
L
DB
WB
BAROM
121
Ml45
070971
70
PONT
FIRE
8
350
2
1
2
19
0550
1 35
+ 07
3500
12
3
1
83
73
29
30
122
M164
071174
70
PONT
STAW
8
400
2
1
1
24
0690
1 37
+13
5000
14
7
1
73
57
29
59
123
M171
071274
70
TOYO
CORO
4
116
2
1
2
12
0785
1 46
+03
2500
9
4
2
73
60
29
58
121
M157
070974
70
VOLK
SEDA
4
097
1
4
2
11
0920
1 56
+ 00
2000
8
3
2
72
62
29
42
125
M174
071274
69
AMMO
AMBA
8
313
4
1
1
19
0650
1 30
+05
4000
13
2
1
70
60
29
57
126
M155
071074
69
BUI C
SPEC
8
350
2
1
2
20
0620
1 31
+ 01
3500
12.3
1
72
61
29
13
127
MI56
071074
69
CHEV
BELA
6
250
1
1
2
25
0410
1 36
+03
4000
12
O
2
70
58
29
42
128
MI63
071174
69
CHEV
CHEV
8
307
2
1
1
20
0530
1 26
+ 02
3500
11
2
2
74
58
29
57
129
M159
071074
69
CHEV
IMPA
8
327
2
1
1
25
0800
1 31
+ 15
4000
12
0
2
75
60
29
53
130
MO88
062874
69
CHEV
MALI
8
350
2
1
2
20
0600
1 29
+ 06
6
3500
11
2
2
70
58
29
41
131
M084
062774
69
CHEV
STAW
8
350
4
1
1
22
0600
1 31
+ 12
6
4500
14
0
1
73
60
29
55
132
MI76
071274
69
CHEV
CAPR
8
350
4
1
1
25
0600
1 30
+ 08
4000
13
2
1
73
63
29
59
133
M069
062474
69
CHRY
STAW
8
383
2
1
1
23
0580
1 30
+ 07
6
4500
14
O
1
70
60
29
60
131
M071
062474
69
DODG
DART
6
225
1
1
2
18
0460
1 43
+ 06
3000
10
3
2
76
60
29
41
135
M161
071174
69
FORD
FAIR
8
302
2
1
2
20
0505
1 25
+ 08
3500
11
2
2
78
58
29
54
136
MO 70
062474
69
FORD
FAIR
8
302
2
1
2
20
0550
1 26
+ 06
6
3500
11
2
2
73
57
29
41
137
M053
061974
69
FORD
MUST
8
351
2
1
2
20
0580
1 27
+ 06
3000
10
3
2
76
67
29
38
138
M076
062574
69
FORD
MUST
8
351
4
1
2
20
0540
1 26
+ 03
6
3500
12
3
1
77
62
29
46
139
D005
060571
69
FORD
GALA
8
390
2
1
1
24
0500
1 32
+ 09
3
4000
13
2
1
80
67
29
34
140
D013
060774
69
MERC
MONT
8
390
2
1
1
24
0670
1 29
+ 06
3
4500
14
0
1
77
68
29
36
141
M173
071274
69
OLDS
98
8
155
4
1
1
25
0560
1 33
+ 04
4500
14
0
1
75
63
29
57
142
M045
061874
69
PLYM
FURY
8
318
2
1
1
24
0400
1 28
+ 10
6
1000
12
O
2
70
62
29
41
143
M186
071374
69
PONT
TEMP
8
350
2
1
2
21
0590
1 31
+ 04
3500
12
3
1
81
72
29
28
144
D017
060874
69
PONT
CATA
8
400
2
1
1
26
0600
1 30
+09
3
1000
13
2
1
74
62
29
01
145
M077
062571
69
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1
4
2
11
0920
1 56
+ 04
2000
8
3
2
80
63
29
45
146
M153
071071
68
AMMO
JAVL
6
232
1
1
2
19
0460
1 31
+ 02
3000
10
3
2
73
62
29
43
147
M057
062071
68
BUIC
ELEC
8
430
4
1
2
25
0560
1 30
+ 05
6
4500
14
0
1
74
64
29
31
148
M090
062871
68
CADI
DEVI
8
472
4
1
1
26
0580
1 27
+ 10
5000
14
7
1
80
61
29
38
149
M094
062971
68
CHEV
MALI
6
230
1
1
2
20
0740
1 32
+ 10
3500
11
2
2
70
58
29
11
150
M062
062174
68
CHEV
IMPA
8
307
2
1
2
25
0480
1 28
+02
6
4000
12
0
2
75
62
29
09
151
M073
062574
68
CHEV
IMPA
8
327
4
1
1
25
0460
1 35
+07
6
4000
12
0
2
72
62
29
41
152
M140
070874
68
CHEV
MALI
8
327
4
1
2
20
0530
1 30
-10
3500
11
2
2
81
70
29
40
153
M187
071374
68
CHEV
MALI
8
327
4
1
2
20
0580
1 31
+ 04
3500
12
3
1
81
71
29
29
151
M080
062674
68
DODG
POLA
8
383
2
1
2
24
0760
1 28
+08
6
4000
13
2
1
80
63
29
60
155
M127
070574
68
FORD
FAI R
6
200
1
1
2
20
0640
1 41
+ 15
3500
11
2
2
72
62
29
50
156
M086
062774
68
FORD
MUST
8
289
2
1
2
20
0490
1 30
+ 18
3000
10
3
2
82
62
29
53
157
M126
070574
68
FORD
GALA
8
302
2
1
2
24
0600
1 28
+ 09
1000
12
0
2
76
64
29
50
158
M035
061474
68
FORD
TORI
8
390
2
1
1
20
0710
1 26
+ 08
6
3500
12
3
1
73
63
29
08
159
MO 87
062871
68
MERC
COUG
8
302
2
1
2
17
0580
1 32
+ 10
6
3500
12
3
1
70
58
29
42
160
M096
062971
68
OLDS
CUTL
8
350
2
1
2
20
0650
1 28
+ 06
3500
12
3
1
72
59
29
22
161
M133
070674
68
PLYM
BELV
8
318
2
1
2
19
0540
1 27
+ 07
3500
11
2
2
76
66
29
51
162
M168
071174
68
PONT
BONN
8
400
4
1
2
20
0580
1 27
+ 18
4500
14
0
1
74
60
29
63
163
M091
06287I
68
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1
4
2
11
0880
1 64
-10
2000
8
3
2
80
60
29
35
164
M138
070874
67
AMMO
AMBA
6
232
1
1
1
19
0640
1 28
+06
3500
11
2
2
82
70
29
43
165
M058
062074
67
BUIC
LESA
8
340
4
1
1
25
0480
1 35
-01
6
4000
12
0
2
76
67
29
05
166
M074
062574
67
CADI
DEVI
8
429
4
1
1
24
0500
1 27
+ 10
6
5000
14,7
1
70
58
29
40
167
M152
071074
67
CHEV
CAMA
6
250
1
1
2
18
0460
1 33
+ 06
3000
10
3
2
74
62
29
37
168
Ml 04
070174
67
CHEV
IMPA
8
283
2
1
2
17
0510
1 29
+ 02
4000
12
0
2
77
67
29
33
169
M089
062874
67
CHEV
IMPA
8
283
2
1
2
24
0670
1 27
+ 05
6
4000
12
0
2
73
62
29
38
170
M036
061371
67
CHEV
STAW
8
327
4
1
1
22
0460
1 30
-09
6
4000
13
2
1
80
64
29
02
171
M066
062271
67
CHRY
NEWP
8
383
2
1
1
24
0850
1 36
+ 08
6
4000
13
2
1
72
57
29
42
172
Ml66
071174
67
DODG
MONA
8
383
2
1
2
25
0430
1 30
+ 03
4000
12
0
2
70
58
29
60
173
M064
062274
67
FORD
GALA
8
289
2
1
2
25
0630
1 25
+ 06
4000
12
0
2
74
60
29
40
171
m061
062174
67
FORD
GALA
8
289
2
1
2
25
0540
1 27
+ 05
6
4000
12
0
2
78
65
29
04
175
M137
070871
67
FORD
GALA
8
390
2
1
1
25
0580
1 24
+ 11
4000
13
2
1
82
72
29
13
176
M067
062274
67
MERC
MONT
8
390
2
1
2
24
0620
1 33
+ 04
4000
13
2
1
73
57
29
43
177
M172
071274
67
OLDS
CUTL
8
330
2
1
2
20
0640
1 33
+ 09
3500
12
3
1
73
61
29
57
178
M150
070974
67
PLYM
BARR
6
225
1
1
2
18
0540
1 35
+ 00
3000
10
3
2
75
68
29
30
179
M188
071474
67
PONT
VENT
8
400
2
1
2
26
0740
1 28
+ 04
4000
12
0
2
78
70
29
31
180
M08l
062674
67
VOLK
SEDA
4
091
1
4
2
11
1020
1 46
+ 15
2000
8
3
2
78
62
29
57
107
-------
Appendix B - Listing of Test Vehicle Use and Maintenance Data
Legend
VEH - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
VIN - Vehicle Identification Number
ODOM - Odometer Reading
PDATE - Purchase Date of Vehicle (montht year or 9999: don't know)
N - New or Used (1: new, 2: used)
VMT1 - Vehicle Miles Traveled During the Past Year
VMT2 - Vehicle Miles Traveled During the Year Before Last
%C - Percent City Driving
%S - Percent Suburban Driving
%F - Percent Freeway Driving
LOC - Date of Last Oil Change (month, year or 9999: don't know)
%W - Percent Driving to and from Work
ZG - Percent Shopping
%T - Percent Transporting Family Members
'V - Percent Vacation Driving
7B - Percent Business Driving (not to and from work)
LTU - Last Tune Up (month, year)
W - Who performed tune up?
1: franchised dealer
2; independent garage
3i service station
A: owner or friend
9: don't know
108
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT 1
VMT2
%c
%s
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
001
71
BUIC
R I V I
1y87w1h1i6271
008069
1073
1
08066
00000
75
15
10
0171
00
25
25
25
25
0371
1
002
7!)
CHEV
CAPR
1n39r1ci15559
003683
1073
1
03700
00000
85
15
00
0271
50
10
00
10
00
9999
9
003
71
CHEV
NOVA
1y17k1l115858
005381
1073
1
05000
00000
90
05
05
0171
15
25
20
10
00
1073
1
001
7
DODG
DART
LH11G1R207171
001560
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
005
7
FORD
MAVE
1K92F105967
005885
1073
1
08100
00000
90
10
00
0171
80
08
08
01
00
9999
9
006
71
FORD
TORI
1B32H121196
007103
1173
1
07100
00000
80
10
10
9999
20
10
10
00
60
9999
9
007
71
OLDS
CUTL
3G37K1R121013
003906
1173
1
01000
00000
80
10
10
9999
50
10
30
10
00
9999
9
008
71
PLYM
SCAM
VH23G1117127
001513
1073
1
01500
Ooooo
85
02
13
9999
75
05
15
00
05
9999
9
009
71
PONT
CATA
2L57R1C102286
005771
1173
1
05771
12000
50
25
25
0571
80
05
00
15
00
9999
9
010
71
VOLK
SEDA
1112038516
006336
1073
1
06000
00000
00
00
00
0171
75
10
05
10
00
0171
1
Oil
73
AMMO
GREM
A3A165E318270
011119
0173
1
11000
00000
97
01
02
0171
50
35
10
05
00
0171
1
012
73
BUIC
CENT
1D29J3Z126667
011077
0373
1
09000
00000
60
10
30
0171
60
05
00
15
20
0171
1
013
73
BUIC
R I VI
1y87u3h187186
028122
9999
1
26000
00000
90
05
05
0171
90
05
05
00
00
0371
1
oil
73
CADI
FLEE
6b69R3Q17^292
018382
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
0X5
73
CAPR
SEDA
gaecmp71999
001863
1173
1
OOOOO
12000
95
00
05
9999
00
00
05
05
90
9999
9
016
73
CHEV
VEGA
1V77A3U123976
013363
1072
1
10000
03000
95
05
00
0571
00
90
10
00
00
0571
1
017
73
CHEV
NOVA
1X27D36H373
017395
1272
1
OlOOO
10000
60
20
20
9999
80
00
10
05
05
9999
9
018
73
CHEV
NOVA
1X17F3L166521
011186
0773
1
11600
13000
60
10
30
9999
50
25
00
20
05
9999
9
019
73
CHEV
NOVA
1X17F3L130768
023929
1172
1
17000
17000
15
15
10
0271
81
02
02
01
10
0573
1
020
73
CHEV
MALI
1D29H3K557970
010900
0773
1
10000
00000
85
10
05
9999
00
75
10
05
10
9999
9
021
73
CHEV
MALI
1D37H3K1H552
013157
1072
1
09000
01000
75
00
25
0371
60
30
00
00
10
0371
3
022
73
CHEV
MONT
1H57K3K590855
OO6892
1073
1
06050
00000
15
55
00
9999
10
20
00
70
00
9999
1
023
73
CHEV
CAPR
1N17R35116770
013089
1072
1
06000
01500
65
30
05
0571
70
10
10
10
00
9999
9
021
73
CHRY
NEV/P
CL13M3C236501
018277
0373
1
18500
00000
15
60
25
9999
00
20
15
50
15
9999
9
025
73
DATS
1200
LB110981331
000933
0373
1
00900
00000
95
05
00
9999
00
95
00
05
00
9999
1
026
73
DODG
DART
LL11C3R362317
008711
0773
1
08711
00000
10
10
50
0671
00
30
00
60
10
9999
9
027
73
DODG
CHAR
WH23G3A226811
001116
1273
1
00000
00000
70
10
20
017't
70
10
10
10
00
9999
9
028
73
FORD
PINT
F3R11X206922F
003776
0773
1
03598
00000
80
10
10
1173
00
15
65
20
00
1173
1
029
73
FORD
MAVE
3K91L215199
008197
0673
1
08000
00000
75
15
10
9999
60
15
10
00
15
9999
9
030
73
FORD
MAVE
3K92F112510
011665
1272
1
07000
00000
75
25
00
0571
00
50
25
25
00
0571
031
73
FORD
TORI
F3A27H27V755F
001996
0573
1
01995
00000
10
90
00
0571
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
032
73
FORD
TORI
F3H30H172016F
026397
0671
25000
25000
60
20
20
0671
00
05
05
10
80
0671
2
033
73
FORD
STAW
3P71515511
017973
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
031
73
FORD
LTD
F3P63S133628F
022365
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
035
73
MAZD
RX2
S122A115801
023199
1272
1
06000
18000
50
30
20
9999
10
20
20
50
00
9999
1
036
73
MERC
BROU
F3H11N537719F
01165I
0173
1
11000
00000
90
05
05
1173
91
02
00
02
02
0371
1
037
73
OLDS
CUTL
3J57M3M351133
011016
0173
1
12000
02000
85
10
05
0571
15
03
75
02
05
0171
2
038
73
OLDS
CUTL
3J57U3R119158
019970
1172
1
13000
13000
70
29
01
0671
80
08
02
10
00
0671
3
039
73
PLYM
VAL I
vl11G3R126H5
021305
0173
1
11000
07000
50
25
25
0671
50
20
25
05
00
0371
3
0*40
73
PLYM
FURY
PH13K3D277116
019501
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
041
73
PONT
LEMA
2D29M3Z117615
007291
0573
1
07000
00000
90
05
05
9999
10
20
10
30
30
9999
9
042
73
PONT
CATA
2L69R3C119113
012032
0172
1
01000
01000
85
05
10
9999
00
10
60
30
00
9999
1
013
73
TOYO
CORO
RT89018535
013782
0773
1
11000
12000
50
10
10
1273
50
25
00
25
00
1273
1
Oil
73
VOLK
SEDA
1332H6113
028501
1072
1
20000
08000
25
25
50
0571
70
15
05
10
00
0571
1
015
73
VOLK
STAW
1632025361
015315
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
016
72
BUIC
SKYL
1D37H2H186837
029099
9999
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
017
72
BUIC
CENT
1P39V2C111233
021311
0672
1
12000
12000
75
15
10
0271
00
65
10
25
00
9999
9
018
72
CHEV
VEGA
1V77B20160162
015501
0872
1
12000
03500
30
10
60
9999
80
10
07
03
00
9999
1
049
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27D2L163083
032092
0872
1
15000
15000
75
15
10
0171
50
05
25
20
25
1073
1
050
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27F2L130109
021085
0272
1
12000
12000
10
20
10
1273
00
50
50
00
00
1073
1
051
72
CHEV
IMPA
1M69H2C207213
056305
0772
1
30000
00000
25
25
50
0171
96
00
00
01
00
0171
2
052
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27H2L117301
038752
0872
2
20000
09000
10
10
80
0171
90
05
00
05
00
0171
2
053
72
CHEV
IMPA
IM39H2J129686
029792
0573
2
10000
00000
90
05
05
9999
00
90
00
10
00
9999
9
051
72
CHEV
STAW
1L15R2C133678
021160
0272
1
00000
00000
90
05
05
0171
60
20
10
10
00
1073
1
055
72
DATS
SEDA
PL510316112
021123
0672
1
12000
12000
80
10
10
0271
30
15
15
15
25
0271
2
056
72
DODG
DART
LH23G2B192575
038965
0272
1
20000
19000
60
20
20
0171
60
10
02
18
10
0371
1
057
72
DODG
POLA
DM13K2D260030
020523
1272
2
06000
01500
70
10
20
1273
08
00
00
90
02
0773
1
058
72
FORD
PINT
F2R10X116765F
011897
9972
1
07000
07000
00
00
00
0I7I
00
00
00
00
00
1173
1
059
72
FORD
MAVE
2K92F112873
039630
1272
1
22000
18000
15
15
10
0371
15
05
05
02
73
1173
1
060
72
FORD
TORI
2A35H319508
021319
0772
1
12000
15000
85
05
10
1173
90
05
00
05
00
0171
3
109
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
%C
%S
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
061
72
FORD
STAW
F2P70H119118F
010856
0172
1
05000
05000
85
00
15
0371
00
50
35
15
00
0371
2
062
72
FORD
LTD
F2P61S151969F
030662
0572
1
17000
13000
60
10
30
0171
90
05
00
05
00
1273
1
063
72
FORD
THUN
2J87N159669
027381
0172
1
10000
10000
85
10
05
0571
75
15
10
00
00
0571
1
061
72
LINC
CONT
F2Y89A871080F
065573
9999
2
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
065
72
MERC
MONT
F27725612111F
019387
0273
2
08000
00000
20
20
60
0271
10
20
10
60
00
0171
2
066
72
OLDS
CUTL
3J39K2M100169
017372
0172
1
07500
07500
80
10
10
0171
00
10
50
10
00
0171
1
067
72
OLDS
DELT
3N57T2X132122
02I391
9972
1
05000
10000
50
30
20
0171
50
10
20
10
10
0873
1
068
72
OPEL
1900
519757200
016821
1072
1
12000
00000
10
10
50
0371
10
00
10
10
70
0773
1
069
72
PLYM
DUST
VL29B2177157
028169
0372
1
13000
13000
85
05
10
0171
75
10
05
10
00
0371
1
070
72
PLYM
SATE
RH11G26217811
022399
0872
1
12000
10000
15
30
55
9999
20
05
05
30
10
9999
1
071
72
PONT
LEMA
2D37M2A119729
023821
99 72
1
11000
11000
99
01
00
0171
99
01
00
00
00
9999
1
072
72
PONT
BONN
2n69u2C?06273
013I85
1172
1
10000
00000
50
20
30
0171
00
10
10
70
10
0171
3
073
72
TOYO
CORO
TE21620617
019219
1272
1
18000
00000
85
05
10
9999
90
01
01
02
03
9999
2
071
72
VOLK
SEDA
1122501002
021837
0573
2
15000
00000
10
20
10
0571
60
20
05
15
00
0171
2
075
72
VOLK
SEDA
1122586396
021573
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
076
71
AMMO
STAW
A1A187H271168
038253
0671
1
10000
10000
25
25
50
0571
15
15
15
15
10
1073
1
077
71
BUIC
SKYL
133271Z129905
025651
0771
1
08000
03000
75
20
05
0171
00
10
10
80
00
0171
2
078
71
BUIC
ELEC
181391H118690
013873
1272
2
20000
00000
75
15
10
0873
02
02
05
11
80
0173
1
079
71
CADI
DEVI
683171Q135162
020990
0171
1
06000
06000
98
02
00
9999
10
00
00
00
90
9973
1
080
71
CHEV
VEGA
111771U325655
OOI933
9971
1
01700
00000
75
25
00
1273
00
50
50
00
00
1273
1
081
71
CHEV
MALI
136371L107915
016628
0571
1
11000
13000
85
05
10
0571
70
20
05
05
00
0571
2
082
71
CHEV
NOVA
111691W310120
OI690I
0971
1
00000
00000
90
05
05
0371
90
03
00
07
00
0073
3
083
71
CHEV
MALI
136371K157116
025115
0271
1
07500
10000
80
10
10
0171
65
10
00
00
25
0371
3
081
71
CHEV
IMPA
161171C135103
030775
1071
2
06000
06000
99
00
01
0371
95
00
00
05
00
9999
9
085
71
CHEV
IMPA
1616915259009
027281
0971
1
10000
10000
50
25
25
9999
50
20
20
10
00
9973
3
086
71
CHRY
300
CS23T1C251367
026786
9971
1
10000
10000
90
10
00
027I
10
10
30
10
10
0271
1
087
71
DATS
SEDA
LB110733100
012105
0672
2
17500
10000
30
30
35
0973
60
10
05
25
00
0171
2
088
71
DODG
VAN
B2 3AE1U152370
015621
0670
18000
12000
70
05
25
0171
01
25
23
50
01
0171
2
089
71
FORD
PINT
F1X10X208965F
017298
0371
1
12000
12000
20
05
75
1173
75
15
05
05
00
0171
2
090
71
FORD
MAVE
FIK91T182298F
031558
0771
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
0I7I
30
30
10
10
20
0973
2
091
71
FORD
STAW
F1A10F111981F
011676
9971
1
01000
10000
50
50
25
0371
10
50
10
10
20
0171
1
092
71
FORD
MUST
F1F05H109358F
053691
0872
2
18000
07000
20
60
20
0171
80
10
05
00
05
0171
H
093
71
FORD
THUN
fiy83niioio1f
011332
1071
1
12000
12000
50
25
25
0371
00
20
15
35
00
1073
1
091
71
MERC
MONT
1Z115519155
032967
0871
1
12000
12000
60
35
05
0171
70
05
00
10
15
1173 3
095
71
OLDS
CUTL
336871M116602
039250
0271
1
10000
15000
90
05
05
1073
50
20
10
10
10
0371 1
096
71
OLDS
DELT
361391x103111
019612
1270
1
10000
10000
95
05
00
9999
00
80
20
00
00
9999
1
097
71
PLYM
SCAM
VH23C1R182833
021559
0171
1
02100
03000
90
05
05
9971
00
90
00
05
05
0171
2
098
71
PLYM
SATE
RH11G1G232110
029820
0172
2
12000
08000
70
20
10
0171
60
20
10
10
00
0371
1
099
71
PONT
FI RE
226871N122227
018628
0171
1
15000
18000
60
30
10
0171
10
20
10
30
00
9999
1
100
71
PONT
CATA
252691x311593
022075
1071
1
07500
07500
75
10
15
0571
00
10
00
90
00
027"
3
101
71
TOYO
CORO
TE21009825
OII783
0872
2
06500
13000
80
15
05
0371
70
02
00
25
03
0371
1
102
71
VOLK
SEDA
1112113667
033100
9971
1
12000
15000
65
10
25
0171
80
05
05
10
00
0371
1
103
70
BUIC
STAW
160160C107385
011971
1269
1
11000
10000
90
05
05
0171
70
00
10
05
15
1173
2
101
70
CHEV
STAW
131360L132321
071738
0772
2
11000
11000
90
03
07
0973
00
35
55
10
00
1173
2
105
70
CHEV
NOVA
111270W138129
059331
0969
1
12000
12000
90
10
00
0571
75
20
05
00
00
0571
1
106
70
CHEV
IMPA
161390S181190
013513
9970
1
00500
00500
90
05
05
9999
00
70
15
15
00
9973
3
107
70
CHEV
IMPA
161690T131600
015888
0173
2
12000
00000
70
05
25
9999
1C
00
10
25
55
9973
1
108
70
CHEV
MALI
136370L111501
028250
0770
2
05000
05000
75
10
15
0171
60
10
20
10
00
0171
3
109
70
CHEV
IMPA
1611705118767
053077
0370
2
13000
15000
80
10
10
9999
00
10
80
05
05
0271
3
110
70
DODG
POLA
DM13LOD176351
062159
1071
2
15000
17000
10
10
20
0171
01
99
00
00
00
1173
9
111
70
FORD
MAVE
FOK91T216267
053129
1270
1
13000
15000
10
10
20
0171
05
60
15
20
00
0371
2
112
70
FORD
MUST
0F01F121761
021139
9972
2
01500
03000
80
10
10
1273
00
10
00
90
00
0271
1
113
70
FORD
TORI
FOR32H123775F
057651
1269
1
16000
11000
50
10
10
1273
00
25
00
75
00
1273
1
111
70
FORD
CUST
FOU51H157090F
055788
0170
1
15000
10000
90
08
02
0171
50
15
01
03
01
0370
2
115
70
FORD
LTD
F0P61Y106H9F
021009
1169
1
07500
07500
80
10
10
0973
05
35
00
15
15
0973
2
116
70
MERC
MARQ
0z63n626555
038287
1070
1
03000
15000
75
15
10
0371
00
10
80
10
00
0371
9
117
70
OLDS
CUTL
336690Z129727
051967
0770
1
25000
22000
50
50
00
0371
00
25
25
50
00
0271
1
118
70
OI.DS
TORO
391870M612213
011983
1269
1
10000
12000
70
05
25
0171
00
10
00
10
80
0171
1
119
70
PLYM
FURY
PM11GOD111916
029250
1170
1
06500
07000
85
10
05
1073
35
65
00
00
00
1073
2
120
70
PLYM
FURY
PH13G0D19H63
073576
0271
2
15000
20000
00
00
00
0571
00
00
00
00
00
0673
1
110
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DENVER
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
%c
%s
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
121
70
PONT
LEMA
237370Z126568
056312
0170
1
10000
00000
50
10
10
0171
50
05
10
05
00
0171
2
122
70
PONT
ST AW
252360X158165
029661
1070
1
05000
05000
50
30
20
0571
10
20
20
10
10
1273
2
123
70
TOYO
CORO
RT13183800
016658
0270
1
10000
10000
80
10
10
9999
85
05
05
05
00
9999
2
121
70
VOLK
SEDA
1102670792
037676
0171
2
07000
15000
50
25
25
0I7I
00
10
10
20
60
1073
2
125
69
AMMO
STAW
A9A085M18091
083867
9971
2
01200
01000
90
05
05
1273
90
01
06
01
02
1073
1
126
69
BUI C
LESA
152379X126109
090190
1268
1
18000
15000
70
20
10
9999
10
30
20
20
20
9999
1
127
69
CHEV
CIO
CS119Z900761
037187
0873
2
05000
00000
80
10
10
9999
60
10
15
05
10
9999
9
128
69
CHEV
MALI
136379K175687
058111
0869
1
12000
12000
90
05
05
9999
50
20
25
00
05
9999
9
129
69
CHEV
STAW
156169J273791
061179
0673
2
12000
00000
80
10
10
0371
60
10
20
10
00
0171
1
130
69
CHEV
IMPA
161399L039H1
069793
9969
1
15000
15000
10
65
25
0271
60
15
10
10
05
0271
3
131
69
CHEV
CAMA
121379N555011
016123
1268
1
10000
10000
50
00
50
0171
75
05
00
00
20
0373
1
132
69
CHEV
STAW
1661695139505
015380
0970
1
08000
12000
20
05
75
0371
01
11
15
60
10
0171
1
133
69
CHRY
NEWP
CE27G9C272956
011155
0170
1
10000
10000
80
05
15
0171
02
10
73
15
00
1173
2
131
69
DODG
DART
LH11B9B231059
035001
0569
1
06000
06000
85
05
10
1173
75
15
00
10
00
0571
1
135
69
FORD
FAIR
9K33F117573
016802
9969
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
OU73
10
00
15
00
75
0173
2
136
69
FORD
MUST
9F01F211609
058567
9969
1
09000
00000
20
00
80
0771
80
10
00
10
00
0671
1
137
69
FORD
TORI
9R35H186078
010805
1069
1
08000
07000
50
30
20
0571
15
05
20
20
10
1173
2
138
69
FORD
TORI
9K11H101118
056210
1068
1
12000
10000
50
10
10
0371
00
10
15
30
15
0171
1
139
69
FORD
GALA
9P51Y131635
076595
1268
1
10000
12000
50
25
25
0271
10
10
30
10
10
0271
2
110
69
MERC
MONT
9Zl1x60ll9l
028727
0869
1
08000
10000
85
13
02
0371
00
75
25
00
00
0371
2
111
69
OLDS
98
386399M158213
051917
1070
2
02000
15000
25
25
50
1273
00
10
20
70
00
1073
2
112
69
PLYM
FURY
PM13F9D259507
080762
0571
2
02500
01000
50
30
20
0371
00
03
00
02
95
0171
3
113
69
PONT
FIRE
223379N107982
018611
9969
1
09000
10000
35
05
60
0171
90
02
05
01
02
0171
3
11)14
69
PONT
GTO
212679R120750
068511
0269
1
10000
10000
25
20
55
0371
90
00
00
10
00
0171
1
115
69
VOLK
SEDA
1591017186
018107
9969
1
09000
09000
95
00
05
0171
00
50
50
00
00
0171
2
116
68
AMMO
JAVE
A85795B331931
OI3696
0768
1
10000
00000
60
20
20
0171
60
20
00
20
00
0171
2
117
68
BUI C
RIVE
191878H912508
066127
9968
2
10000
10000
60
20
20
9999
10
10
10
20
20
1272
2
118
68
CADI
DEVI
J8320900
052671
0670
2
10000
12000
85
10
05
0271
10
05
00
05
80
9999
1
119
68
CHEV
STAW
131358K111226
066518
9970
2
00000
00000
90
10
00
0371
00
30
60
]0
00
9972
2
150
68
CHEV
STAW
151358J218261
061301
0768
1
10000
10000
50
50
00
0171
20
10
20
50
00
0673
1
151
68
CHEV
CAMA
12I678NI36630
056659
0668
1
08000
09000
10
10
20
0571
60
85
00
05
10
0271
2
152
68
CHEV
IMPA
166178T221975
065913
1072
2
10000
00000
10
70
20
0271
50
10
25
10
05
1273
2
153
68
CHEV
MAL I
138678K170858
053513
0172
2
06500
06500
75
15
10
0571
25
25
00
25
25
0571
2
151
68
DODG
POLA
DL23G8D231671
OI5I78
0668
1
02000
03000
50
25
25
0571
00
50
00
50
00
9999
1
155
68
FORD
MUST
BFDITI9878I
061713
9970
2
13000
15000
60
10
30
0271
50
10
00
30
10
0271
1
156
68
FORD
MUST
8F01C101993
089510
1067
1
12000
20000
25
15
60
0371
65
10
10
10
05
1173
3
157
68
FORD
MUST
8R02J121756
093561
0168
1
10000
12000
60
30
10
1273
80
20
00
00
00
1073
1
158
68
FORD
STAW
8P73Y1712312
069508
1068
1
08000
10000
80
10
10
0271
50
15
15
15
05
0271
1
159
68
MERC
COUG
8F91F5015H
056906
0672
2
09000
08000
75
15
10
0571
00
00
00
00
00
0973
1
160
68
OLDS
CUTL
336878Z118163
OI3629
0568
1
06000
07000
10
30
30
1273
05
50
00
15
00
1273
2
l6l
68
PLYM
SATE
RH11F8A272076
OI3886
1173
2
06000
00000
75
05
20
0371
75
00
00
25
00
0171
2
162
68
PONT
GTO
21237R1083
106917
0373
2
25000
00000
35
15
50
0571
50
15
02
33
00
0571
1
163
68
VOLK
SEDA
118678713
065768
0668
1
02000
08000
75
20
05
1273
10
60
00
00
00
1273
2
161
67
AMMO
RAMB
A7KA55E129612
OII636
9968
1
10000
00000
75
15
10
9999
00
15
15
05
05
9973
1
165
67
BUI C
SPEC
1356977111532
018160
1067
1
03000
05000
95
03
02
9999
00
05
05
90
00
1273
2
166
67
CADI
FLEE
P71H13196
091935
1073
2
07000
00000
30
00
70
1073
00
10
20
00
70
1073
2
167
67
CHEV
IMPA
163877L1715H
051962
1167
1
07500
07500
90
05
05
0171
50
05
05
05
35
1273
2
168
67
CHEV
IMPA
161877F238811
100325
9999
2
25000
25000
55
30
15
9999
70
10
10
00
10
0371
2
169
67
CHEV
MALI
136177K106883
073191
0372
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
0171
10
50
20
20
00
1273
1
170
67
CHEV
IMPA
1613975119190
039635
9967
1
01000
05000
85
15
05
0271
00
20
10
25
15
9972
3
171
67
CHRY
NEWP
CE13G73252115
068711
9967
1
07000
08000
90
05
05
9999
75
10
05
10
00
9999
2
172
67
DODG
CORO
WH23F77153195
018105
0668
2
10000
10000
75
10
15
0571
50
25
00
25
00
1173
2
173
67
FORD
CUST
7 652c155978
089560
0667
1
12000
11000
50
00
50
0171
75
10
00
15
00
0171
1
171
67
FORD
MUST
7F01C111392
072562
0367
2
10000
10000
50
25
25
9999
00
50
00
50
00
0872
2
175
67
FORD
GALA
7157H163 356
071031
0773
2
09000
00000
10
10
20
9999
80
15
05
00
00
0773
2
176
67
MERC
MONT
7215H519225
061797
0873
2
05000
00000
65
10
25
0171
50
25
25
00
00
0171
2
177
67
OLDS
DELM
356697X128571
086121
1072
2
03000
03000
10
20
10
1273
60
10
10
10
10
9999
9
178
67
PLYM
VAL I
VL21B72327551
066765
9972
2
00000
00000
10
50
10
9999
00
30
60
10
00
9999
1
179
67
PONT
TEMP
235177P211531
010790
9967
1
03000
03000
50
50
00
1173
00
50
00
50
00
9999
3
180
67
VOLK
SEDA
117659110
069769
1271
2
13000
11000
30
20
50
0571
25
15
10
00
50
0571
1
111
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
HOUSTON
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE N
VMTl
VMT2
%c
%s
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
001
71
BUIC
LESA
1P69T1X121872
006535
1173 1
00000
00000
30
30
10
9999
10
05
05
00
80
9999
9
002
71
CHEV
NOVA
1X27H1L102530
017899
1173 1
17500
00000
50
30
20
0271
00
01
01
01
97
9999
9
003
71
CHEV
MAL 1
1D37H1K165892
001963
1273 1
00000
00000
80
10
10
9999
10
00
05
00
85
9999
9
001
71
DODG
CHAR
WH23G1121898
001361
9999 1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
005
71
FORD
TORI
4B27F161375
001352
0271 1
01000
00000
99
00
00
9999
10
00
00
00
90
9999
9
006
71
FORD
CUST
F1W53H136157
007793
1273 1
07000
15000
30
30
10
9999
00
00
00
10
90
1273
9
007
71
OLDS
DELT
3N57K1M210607
002339
0271 1
00000
00000
50
00
50
9999
50
10
10
25
05
9999
9
008
71
PLYM
DUST
VL29G1113207
001738
1074 1
01715
00000
75
05
20
9999
20
10
05
05
60
9999
9
009
71
PONT
CATA
2L69R1X101813
010661
1073 1
10000
00000
50
00
50
9999
05
00
00
00
95
9999
1
010
71
VOLK
SEDA
1112086180
003113
1173 1
00300
00000
75
05
20
9999
50
10
10
10
10
9999
9
Oil
73
AMMO
GREM
A3A165A136778
012709
1072 1
09000
03000
99
00
01
0171
50
30
00
20
00
9999
1
012
73
BUIC
STAW
IFI5H32131789
031108
0573 1
31108
00000
50
10
10
0271
00
05
10
10
75
0271
2
013
73
BUIC
ELEC
1Z39T3H165332
011017
0173 1
10500
00000
50
20
30
1173
05
25
50
20
00
9999
9
Oil
73
CADI
DEVI
6D19R3Q219581
013017
0373 1
10000
16000
80
10
10
9999
00
05
00
00
95
9999
9
015
73
CAPR
CAPR
GAECNJ21788
016706
0173 1
15000
00000
30
10
30
0371
60
10
00
30
00
0171
2
016
73
CHEV
VEGA
1V15B3U381515
010021
0573 1
06000
00000
90
00
10
0171
90
10
00
00
00
0171
3
017
73
CHEV
VEGA
1V77B3113970
006971
0773 1
07000
00000
20
60
20
9999
50
31
10
06
00
9999
9
018
73
CHEV
CHEL
1C29F3R1A9111
035802
0171 1
31000
00000
70
20
10
0271
00
00
00
00
00
0271
2
019
73
CHEV
NOVA
Y27F3L211106
010077
0773 2
10080
00000
80
10
10
0873
01
01
90
05
00
0873
1
020
73
CHEV
MONT
1H57H3R179338
005782
0573 1
06000
00000
80
10
10
1273
00
60
10
20
10
9999
9
021
73
CHEV
CAM A
1587H3N133291
006503
0573 1
06500
00000
15
75
10
9999
90
05
03
02
00
0973
1
022
73
CHEV
MALI
1D29K3R131H9
017271
1272 2
15000
00000
70
05
25
0171
70
10
10
10
00
1272
1
023
73
CHEV
CAPR
1N39R35135517
011681
1172 1
11681
00000
80
05
15
0171
00
80
01
15
01
0171
1
021
73
CHRY
NEWP
CL11M3C175710
012518
9999 1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
025
73
DATS
DELU
LB110116210
007681
1273 1
07700
00000
25
00
75
9999
25
25
00
00
50
9999
9
026
73
DODG
DART
LLl1C 3R220515
010131
0573 1
08000
00000
50
50
00
1073
00
30
30
¦3 _
10
9999
9
027
73
DODG
CHAR
WL21C3G156590
011911
0273 1
11925
00000
10
00
60
9999
60
15
10
15
0.0
9999
9
028
73
FORD
STAW
3x12x2576630
008306
0173 1
08200
00000
50
10
10
0173
10
20
00
10
00
1173
1
029
73
FORD
MAVH
3K92T211935
011160
0673 1
11000
00000
90
05
05
9999
80
05
10
05
00
9999
9
030
73
FORD
MAVE
3K92F228011
012278
0673 1
10000
00000
80
10
10
1273
90
05
00
05
00
0973
2
031
73
FORD
MUST
3F011H198072
008811
9973 1
01500
00000
75
15
10
1173
65
25
00
10
00
0373
1
032
73
FORD
TORI
F3A31H199011F
021197
0173 1
21000
03000
60
00
10
097 3
50
00
00
00
50
9999
9
033
73
FORD
LTD
F3G625213117F
013655
0373 1
12000
00000
80
10
10
1173
05
70
20
05
00
0873
2
031
73
FORD
STAW
F3U7651870037
009852
0971 1
07300
00000
10
90
00
1273
00
05
05
10
80
1173
1
035
73
MAZD
RX2
S122A139998
008733
0273 1
08000
00000
90
10
00
0371
80
10
10
00
00
0371
1
036
73
MERC
MARQ
3263N570756
018101
9999 1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
037
73
OLDS
CUTL
3J57K3R153699
011957
0273 1
12000
00000
95
02
02
1273
90
05
01
01
03
1273
2
038
73
OLDS
DELT
3N39T3M173128
022619
1272 1
12000
00000
10
10
50
9999
10
10
00
20
00
9999
1
039
73
PLYM
SATE
RP2 3G3G226208
007112
0673 1
07100
00000
75
25
00
9999
70
1C
10
10
00
9999
1
010
73
PLYM
FURY
PP23K3D191196
015003
0373 1
09000
00000
85
10
05
0271
00
90
00
10
00
0271
2
Oil
73
PONT
VENT
2Y27M3L100888
021118
0973 1
18000
00000
99
01
00
0171
35
10
00
05
50
0171
2
012
73
PONT
BONN
2N69R3X168571
016286
0173 1
16000
00000
30
30
10
1273
00
20
20
10
20
1273
1
013
73
TOYO
CORO
RT85055713
022101
0373 1
20000
00000
10
10
50
9999
30
10
05
05
00
9999
1
Oil
73
VOLK
SEDA
1332183672
018637
1172 1
12000
06000
80
15
05
0371
80
00
00
20
00
1273
9
015
73
VOLK
STAW
2232091328
015211
0373 1
13000
00000
80
00
20
1173
60
05
05
25
05
0171
l
016
72
BUIC
LESA
1N69J2X166508
030113
0172 1
13000
12000
90
05
05
0272
60
15
15
10
00
0272
2
017
72
BUIC
ELEC
1v39t2h160037
027901
0372 1
15000
12000
60
20
20
037"
70
05
20
05
00
1273
1
018
72
CHEV
VEGA
1V77B21129937
016910
0772 1
09000
07000
99
00
00
C271
90
10
00
00
00
0673
2
019
72
CHEV
VEGA
1V11B21310191
037213
9999 1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
050
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27F2L139581
017099
1173 2
01000
00000
85
10
05
1273
85
05
05
03
02
1273
1
051
72
CHEV
MONT
1H57H2R510111
011251
9972 1
28000
16000
80
10
10
0371
80
05
00
15
00
1273
3
052
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27H26165529
015931
0772 1
10000
05000
20
70
10
0171
80
10
10
00
00
1073
2
053
72
CHEV
STAW
1H16T2R603079
021505
1072 1
16000
01000
70
10
20
0371
15
35
20
30
00
0371
1
051
72
CHEV
IMPA
1M17R2S212106
029213
0172 1
16000
12000
10
30
30
0271
02
38
10
20
00
1073
1
055
72
DATS
STAW
PL510917837
015176
0371 2
11000
00000
99
00
01
0173
15
25
00
10
20
0373
2
056
72
DODG
DART
6H23G2B169289
022851
9999 1
20000
00000
90
10
00
9999
10
35
50
Ou
30
0973
2
057
72
DODG
POLA
DM23K2D261116
031211
0173 2
16000
00000
33
33
31
0871
20
20
20
20
20
0271
1
058
72
FORD
PINT
2x12x3387609
051322
1072 1
03000
00000
75
10
15
9999
10
05
30
35
20
9999
1
059
72
FORD
TORI
2A31F316866
035803
0772 1
20000
11000
75
15
10
0171
85
05
00
00
10
0171
2
060
72
FORD
GALA
2G51H159169
029761
1271 1
10000
15000
75
15
10
1073
10
20
10
60
00
1173
3
12
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
HOUSTON
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
%c
%S
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
061
72
FORD
GRAN
2A31H117260
031595
1073
2
01000
00000
99
01
00
0371
00
25
50
25
00
9999
2
062
72
FORD
STAW
F2W71S111709
026116
0971
1
10000
10000
30
20
50
1073
05
25
10
30
00
1073
1
063
72
FORD
LTDB
2e66n112595
022765
0572
1
10000
07000
50
10
10
9999
50
05
05
10
00
1172
2
061
72
LINC
MRKl
F2Y89A868751
021611
0572
1
12000
12000
75
09
16
0573
00
25
25
25
25
0573
1
065
72
MERC
STAW
2Z7725611130
010161
9972
1
20000
20000
90
00
10
0171
10
10
10
10
00
0171
2
066
72
OLDS
DELT
3L69H2E127111
022222
1071
1
10000
12000
50
30
20
1073
20
60
10
10
00
1073
1
067
72
OLDS
STAW
3R15T2M513288
025381
0572
1
12000
13000
65
05
20
0271
00
10
10
20
00
0873
1
068
72
OPEL
STAW
519581688
008913
1072
1
03000
05000
99
01
00
9999
00
90
05
00
05
1273
2
069
72
PLYM
VALI
VL11C2R186278
017567
0172
1
27000
21000
50
10
10
1273
20
10
60
10
00
0171
2
070
72
PLYM
SATE
RH23G2G100160
025172
0172
2
15000
08000
50
00
50
0171
00
30
50
20
00
9999
9
071
72
PONT
VENT
2Y27M2L117353
015377
1072
1
09000
06000
50
25
25
9999
50
20
20
10
00
0673
1
072
72
PONT
BONN
2N39Y2D361008
011751
0872
1
08000
01000
50
25
25
0371
00
00
00
00
00
0873 2
073
72
TOYO
CAR I
TA12015017
017155
0273
1
08000
00000
10
70
20
9999
50
00
00
00
50
9999
1
071
72
VOLK
SEDA
1113D17951
021272
0971
1
09000
10000
70
20
10
9999
99
01
00
00
00
9999
1
075
72
VOLK
SEDA
1122016501
022706
9973
2
10000
00000
30
60
10
9999
30
05
00
65
00
1273
1
076
71
AMMO
JAVE
A1C797H299512
023971
1071
1
10000
10000
95
02
03
0973
08
01
00
01
90
0973
2
077
71
BUI C
SKYL
1336912122179
061222
9971
1
25000
25000
50
35
15
0171
00
90
00
10
00
9973
2
078
71
BUI C
ELEC
181391H113668
023858
0171
1
07000
07000
70
10
20
0371
01
50
00
20
29
0373
1
079
71
CADI
SEDA
6831910158977
033566
0373
2
20000
00000
60
10
30
0171
00
50
10
10
00
1073
1
080
71
CHEV
VEGA
HIIIIVI77850
033811
0371
1
12000
12000
90
05
05
9999
90
10
00
00
00
0573
2
081
71
CHEV
MALI
136371R172651
021189
0171
1
07000
07000
50
05
15
1273
01
13
15
10
01
9973
2
082
71
CHEV
IMPA
1615715155770
038351
0571
1
03000
02000
75
25
00
0271
75
10
10
00
05
0371
1
083
71
CHEV
IMPA
161391C151671
018591
0971
1
00000
00000
50
20
30
0171
20
30
10
10
00
0171
2
081
71
CHEV
MALI
136371R100692
031785
0172
2
00000
00000
70
25
05
0271
00
80
10
10
00
9999
9
085
71
CHEV
IMPA
1G16915216250
018175
1172
2
10000
00000
90
10
00
9999
00
99
00
00
00
9999
9
086
71
CHRY
300
CS23T1C158821
051115
0572
1
20000
30000
75
25
00
1273
75
00
00
25
00
0773
9
087
71
DATS
Z110
LB110857171
013060
0671
1
15000
12000
65
15
20
0371
50
05
25
20
00
0371
1
088
71
DODG
CHAR
WH23C1C227101
022271
1271
1
11000
09000
20
30
50
0271
55
10
15
20
00
0973
2
089
71
FORD
PINT
1X10X181132
020832
0271
1
07000
07000
35
05
60
0271
70
20
05
00
05
0273
1
090
71
FORD
MAVE
1K19T162112
039057
0371
1
11000
11000
50
00
50
0371
90
05
00
05
00
1073
2
091
71
FORD
TORI
1A30F285591
019118
0771
1
00000
00000
10
90
00
0171
75
10
05
10
00
0171
1
092
71
FORD
GALA
1W51H166153
016590
9971
1
12500
11000
80
05
15
0271
75
15
05
05
00
1173
1
093
71
FORD
BROU
1G68N139100
010117
1171
1
12000
12000
75
15
10
9999
00
1o
50
10
00
9999
2
091
71
MERC
MONT
1Z115536175
037912
0171
1
12000
11000
90
05
05
0171
90
05
05
00
00
1173
2
095
71
OLDS
STAW
336361M171619
036717
0171
1
11000
12000
60
10
30
1173
10
25
25
10
00
0973
1
096
71
OLDS
98
386391M172315
019609
0171
1
20000
18000
75
00
25
1273
00
30
10
10
50
1073
1
097
71
PLYM
DUST
VL29C1B180670
017605
0373
2
00060
00000
65
20
15
0371
50
10
10
10
20
0371
2
098
71
PLYM
SATE
RH11G1G179250
010711
1171
1
15000
20000
50
10
10
0171
30
20
10
10
00
1073
3
099
71
PONT
LEMA
237371Z109018
016016
0571
1
15000
15000
70
15
15
0371
20
30
10
20
10
0171
2
100
71
PONT
GRNP
276571AA66986
051678
9971
1
22000
22000
75
15
10
1173
50
15
00
25
10
1173
1
101
71
TOYO
CORO
KE20206577
013895
0771
1
07500
05000
50
50
00
0773
80
10
10
00
00
0773
1
102
71
VOLK
SEDA
1113028126
011209
0173
2
03000
00000
70
20
10
0973
60
10
10
10
10
0973
3
103
70
BUI C
ELEC
181390H232166
059671
0173
2
15000
00000
10
00
60
0171
99
00
00
00
00
0271
1
101
70
CHEV
CHEV
133690K169352
063261
0670
1
16000
16000
30
10
60
0271
80
05
05
10
00
1273
1
105
70
CHEV
CAMA
121870L52358Z
013137
9971
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
1273
60
20
20
00
00
0973
1
106
70
CHEV
IMPA
161690C191815
059959
0870
1
20000
20000
50
10
10
9999
50
20
20
10
00
0973
1
107
70
CHEV
IMPA
161370J105881
061607
0171
1
20000
20000
30
10
60
1073
90
03
02
05
00
1073
2
108
70
CHEV
BELA
156690R113611
056577
9971
2
12000
12000
90
00
10
9999
50
25
00
25
00
1073
1
109
70
CHEV
STAW
1611605203397
051136
0170
1
10000
12000
65
15
20
9999
30
30
20
20
00
0171
1
110
70
DODG
POLA
DL13L0D161846
062389
0171
2
15000
00000
80
00
20
0371
95
05
00
00
00
0973
2
111
70
FORD
MAVE
OK91T351119
030252
0670
1
06000
06000
70
10
20
0271
70
20
05
05
00
0273
2
112
70
FORD
FAIR
0A28F262857
090033
0873
2
13000
00000
30
10
60
9999
20
10
00
70
00
0873
1
113
70
FORD
CUST
OD53H131123
110730
0170
1
30000
30000
25
05
70
1073
50
20
15
15
00
0673
3
111
70
FORD
MUST
OT01H161136
052621
1070
1
15000
25000
90
05
05
0371
85
05
00
10
00
0973
1
115
70
FORD
STAW
0073Y113652
055088
1069
1
00000
00000
70
20
10
1273
00
60
00
10
00
1273
1
116
70
MERC
MARQ
FOZ763K62I839
017392
1070
1
12000
12000
50
25
25
0171
00
50
00
50
00
0573
1
117
70
OLDS
CUTL
312570Z125669
038699
0570
1
10000
10000
65
05
30
1273
10
30
00
60
00
0673
2
118
70
OLDS
DETL
361370C110019
033166
0371
2
09000
10000
50
20
30
9999
30
20
00
50
00
9999
1
119
70
PLYM
FURY
PM13GOD23655
061213
0173
2
11000
00000
98
02
00
9999
90
00
01
06
00
0673
1
120
70
PLYM
FURY
PM13GOF165331
039516
9970
1
00000
00000
60
30
10
0173
00
80
00
20
00
9972
2
113
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
HOUSTON
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
%c
%S
%F
LOC
tw
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
121
70
PONT
FIRE
223870L101119
058352
0570
1
02600
02600
60
20
20
1273
70
10
05
05
10
1273
1
122
70
PONT
CATA
252390X153371
081172
0170
1
20000
20000
90
00
10
0171
10
00
00
00
90
0174
2
123
70
TOYO
STAW
RT78L25168
011035
1270
1
12000
14000
75
10
15
0371
65
15
05
15
00
1173
1
121
70
VOLK
SEDA
1102039569
075858
9969
1
20000
20000
20
60
20
9999
70
10
00
15
05
0274
4
125
69
AMMO
JAVE
A9C79M211765
043807
0174
2
00000
00000
90
00
10
0274
05
05
00
00
90
9999
9
126
69
BUI C
SKYL
111379K11921
061987
0274
2
00000
00000
90
00
10
0274
85
10
00
00
05
0274
1
127
69
CHEV
CAMA
123379N601507
011290
9969
1
15000
10000
30
00
70
9999
60
20
05
05
10
9999
2
128
69
CHEV
STAW
136169K173562
061093
9969
1
20000
18000
75
20
05
0274
65
10
15
10
00
0274
2
129
69
CHEV
NOVA
111279W301306
021016
9969
1
00000
00000
95
00
05
0174
00
85
00
15
00
9999
9
130
69
CHEV
IMPA
161699R013813
047482
0169
1
06000
06000
50
00
50
1073
00
20
30
50
00
0473
9
131
69
CHEV
IMPA
161699R019211
127034
9969
1
36000
38000
20
60
20
9999
80
05
05
05
05
1173
4
132
69
CHEV
STAW
161369R056879
079598
0272
2
09500
09500
80
05
15
1173
02
28
50
20
00
0773
4
133
69
CHRY
TOWN
CP16G9C198720
066029
0370
2
14000
14000
60
20
20
0174
10
50
20
20
00
0973
3
131
69
DODG
DART
LL11B9B100613
054713
9969
1
00000
00000
80
10
10
0374
85
05
05
05
00
0374
2
135
69
FORD
STAW
9D73F123192
056531
1269
1
10000
11000
50
10
40
0274
00
30
30
40
00
0673
4
136
69
FORD
MUST
9F02F203093
073051
0570
2
12000
12000
50
20
30
0274
80
99
00
10
00
0999
4
137
69
FORD
MUST
9F01M127826
075285
9969
1
18000
20000
85
10
05
0274
75
15
10
00
00
0274
1
138
69
FORD
STAW
9K38M168825
080807
0469
1
15000
20000
80
05
15
1273
10
40
40
10
00
1273
2
139
69
FORD
STAW
9E76Y238923
071796
O669
1
13000
18000
60
30
10
1173
10
30
40
10
10
1273
4
110
69
MERC
MONT
9Z72X569612
066167
9969
1
15000
15000
05
40
55
1173
08
37
30
15
10
0673
2
111
69
OLDS
DELT
361399E136206
061586
0273
2
16000
00000
85
10
05
1073
75
10
10
02
03
0673
3
112
69
PLYM
BARR
BH29F8B308122
071407
9969
1
15000
18000
80
15
05
0274
15
75
00
10
00
0174
2
113
69
PONT
LEMA
237379R1109
060722
0570
1
10000
20000
80
10
10
9999
75
10
00
10
05
9973
2
111
69
PONT
CATA
252699R118059
075383
0472
2
12000
12000
80
00
20
1173
00
50
30
20
00
1173
4
115
69
VOLK
SEDA
119851738
029022
1069
2
08000
08000
90
00
10
9999
90
00
00
10
00
0473
4
116
68
AMMO
RAMB
A85060A295217
066325
9968
1
06000
20000
75
25
00
0174
00
15
00
10
75
127 3
2
117
68
BUI C
ELEC
181398H333191
071611
9971
2
12000
12000
80
00
20
9999
00
50
35
15
00
0374
2
118
68
CADI
DEVI
B8228612
078013
9971
2
00000
00000
30
40
30
0973
10
]0
00
00
80
097 3
2
119
68
CHEV
CAMA
123378L316552
073131
0168
1
05000
05000
60
00
40
1073
80
10
10
00
00
1073
2
150
68
CHEV
BELA
1566985203111
036525
0468
1
06000
06000
60
30
10
9999
00
40
30
30
00
0473
4
151
68
CHEV
BE LA
156458R112828
075692
1269
2
12000
12000
90
10
00
0374
00
10
50
10
00
9999
9
152
68
CHEV
MALI
136398K175371
097511
0668
1
20000
25000
10
40
50
9999
90
05
05
00
00
1173
2
153
68
CHEV
CAPR
1664585173107
069825
0468
1
10000
10000
50
50
00
0174
00
50
00
40
10
0973
2
151
68
DODG
POLA
DL11G6D32H76
101482
0768
1
20000
15000
75
20
05
1273
20
20
20
40
00
0973
4
155
68
FORD
MUST
8F01T21586
058638
9968
1
10000
10000
90
05
05
1273
60
20
00
20
00
0274
4
156
68
FORD
MUST
8T03C108099
079327
0668
1
20000
00000
70
20
10
1273
50
10
03
30
07
1273
2
157
68
FORD
FAIR
8A34F117011
081110
0170
2
12000
12000
60
05
35
0171
75
15
10
00
00
0174
4
158
68
FORD
STAW
8U75Y155135
082824
1168
1
15000
15000
70
20
10
0371
05
20
15
10
50
127 3
2
159
68
MERC
STAW
8Z76Y609227
063186
0773
2
01000
00000
50
25
25
0271
25
50
00
25
00
0274
1
160
68
OLDS
CUTS
336878M379728
062774
9968
1
08000
08000
85
05
10
0973
50
25
00
25
00
9973
2
161
68
PLYM
FURY
PE11F8D183123
042736
9971
2
05000
10000
05
00
95
1073
95
05
00
00
00
0873
3
162
68
PONT
CATA
252698E152871
074703
9970
2
10000
15000
70
15
15
9999
90
06
03
01
00
0973
2
163
68
VOLK
SEDA
118201875
012293
9967
2
33000
00000
80
05
15
0171
95
01
01
01
02
0274
9
161
67
AMMO
REBE
A7KA55G193213
062715
0967
1
13000
09000
20
30
50
0371
65
10
10
10
05
0773
2
165
67
BUI C
LESA
151697C111569
077826
0367
1
00950
01100
75
05
25
0374
01
95
04
00
00
0973
4
166
67
CADI
DEVI
B7137128
079547
1266
1
10000
10000
80
10
10
1273
00
50
00
30
20
1273
2
167
67
CHEV
CHEL
131117Z159510
061442
9967
1
00000
00000
85
10
05
0973
40
50
00
01
09
9999
9
168
67
CHEV
IMPA
1618775126566
060516
1172
2
14000
04000
99
00
00
0174
90
05
00
00
05
1273
4
169
67
CHEV
BISC
151697R160212
085064
1067
1
15000
15000
80
10
10
0174
60
10
50
10
15
0773
4
170
67
CHEV
CAPR
166397R1H353
080136
9968
2
12000
18000
70
20
10
0174
50
30
10
05
05
0673
4
171
67
CHRY
NEWP
CE11G73177768
053237
0167
1
06000
06000
95
00
05
0374
00
85
00
15
00
9999
2
172
67
DODG
CORO
WP11F77161164
100611
0167
1
10000
10000
60
20
20
9999
25
50
00
25
00
1173
4
173
67
FORD
CUST
7053C121055
083028
9967
1
12000
12000
40
05
55
0274
10
00
00
00
90
9973
2
171
67
FORD
MUST
7R01C219160
056396
9967
1
05000
06000
95
02
03
1073
03
93
04
00
00
0274
4
175
67
FORD
LTD
7062H12110
077296
0270
2
15000
10000
50
10
10
9999
00
50
00
50
00
1273
4
176
67
MERC
STAW
7Z76Q583876
091213
9999
2
01150
00000
95
05
20
0973
00
70
10
10
10
0374
4
177
67
OLDS
98
381397M38O510
017039
9968
1
20000
30000
70
10
20
0174
40
20
00
00
40
1173
4
178
67
PLYM
BARR
BH23B72218101
100168
9967
1
10000
10000
75
00
25
9999
85
05
05
05
00
0573
2
179
67
PONT
LEMA
237177K127010
067168
9971
2
15000
15000
12
57
21
1273
95
02
00
03
00
1273
1
180
67
VOLK
SEDA
117460136
091649
9972
2
00000
00000
65
10
55
0374
65
05
15
15
00
0374
1
1J4
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DETROIT
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
%C
%s
%F
LOC
%w
%G
%T
tv
%B
LTU
w
001
71
BUI C
ELEC
1V37T1H121725
001013
0271
1
olooo
00000
90
05
05
0171
90
05
00
05
00
9999
9
002
71
CHEV
MONT
1H57RH1607696
006169
0171
2
03100
03000
98
02
00
9999
00
50
50
00
00
9999
9
003
71
CHEV
IMPA
1L17H1J119976
002261
0271
1
02200
00000
80
10
10
9999
05
70
10
10
05
9999
9
001
71
DODG
DART
LH23G1B15U16
001037
0271
1
olooo
00000
70
00
30
0571
15
15
20
25
25
9999
9
005
71
FORD
TORI
1B30F150576
007183
1273
1
07000
00000
95
00
05
9999
75
25
00
00
00
0171
1
006
71
FORD
LTD
1G67H115686
008286
0271
1
08000
00000
70
05
25
0671
30
10
20
05
35
9999
9
007
71
OLDS
CUTL
3J57K1M152321
001191
0571
1
01189
00000
95
03
02
0571
80
05
05
05
05
9999
9
008
71
PLYM
SATE
RP23G1R157053
011113
0371
1
01000
00000
70
20
10
0171
70
10
10
10
00
9999
9
009
71
PONT
BONN
2N69A1P125350
011628
0271
1
08000
00000
30
30
10
9999
30
20
10
10
00
0271
1
010
71
VOLK
SEDA
1312019617
001876
0171
1
01800
00000
50
00
50
0371
50
10
00
00
10
0371
1
Oil
73
AMMO
HORN
A3C037A715116
013030
0373
1
10000
00000
75
20
05
0371
65
25
05
05
00
9999
9
012
73
BUI C
LESA
1N57H3H539019
012062
0173
1
12000
00000
50
50
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
013
73
BUI C
LIMI
1V37T3H503578
017501
0273
1
15000
00000
00
30
70
9999
20
05
00
50
25
0171
2
Oil
73
CADI
DEVI
6019R30115858
018699
1173
2
09000
09000
80
10
10
0571
10
02
06
02
80
1173
1
015
73
CAPR
SEDA
gaeml15013
033081
1172
1
21000
00000
20
70
10
9999
70
10
00
15
05
0571
1
016
73
CHEV
STAW
1V1583U139612
025618
1072
1
08000
18000
30
10
60
0171
70
10
10
10
00
0673
1
017
73
CHEV
CAMA
1Q87D3N112399
030182
0271
1
20000
00000
90
10
00
9999
75
15
00
10
00
9999
9
018
73
CHEV
CHEV
1C37F3H73179
010983
0373
1
10000
00000
90
05
05
9999
90
05
05
00
00
9999
1
019
73
CHEV
MONT
H57H31123177
029527
1172
1
20000
02000
75
25
25
0571
90
10
00
00
00
0171
1
020
73
CHEV
CHEV
1D29H3B563250
017158
9999
1
00000
00000
00
00
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9999
9
021
73
CHEV
LAGU
1E37H31160121
017951
0273
1
12000
00000
50
20
30
1173
60
20
00
20
00
1173
2
022
73
CHEV
MONT
1H57K3H23956
012121
1272
1
03000
09000
90
05
05
0171
00
10
10
20
00
0271
2
023
73
CHEV
CAPR
1N39R3H21939
018139
0172
1
10000
07000
00
00
00
0671
00
00
00
00
00
0571
2
024
73
CHRY
NEWY
CS11T3C277716
023139
0573
1
20000
00000
25
00
75
9999
50
10
00
10
00
9999
9
025
73
DATS
SEDA
HLS3069719
022115
0873
1
00000
00000
50
50
00
9999
00
00
00
00
00
9973
1
026
73
DODG
DART
LH23C3B593182
010712
0973
1
10000
00000
98
01
01
0171
90
02
06
01
01
9999
9
027
73
DODG
DART
LL29G3B502038
018502
0673
1
17000
00000
80
05
15
9999
60
05
05
05
25
0173
3
028
73
FORD
PINT
3X11X181711
031939
0673
1
27000
00000
10
10
20
0571
50
05
05
10
00
1273
2
029
73
FORD
MAVE
3F93T238102
013301
0873
1
12000
00000
10
35
55
O67I
00
10
35
00
55
9999
1
030
73
FORD
MUST
3F03F113027
016308
1172
1
08000
08000
60
30
10
1173
10
10
10
00
10
1173
1
031
73
FORD
LTD
3W68H210910
011011
0673
1
11000
00000
90
05
05
9999
85
05
05
05
00
9999
9
032
73
FORD
MUST
3F01H102307
019151
0273
2
10000
00000
60
10
30
0571
50
30
00
20
00
9973
1
033
73
FORD
STAW
13W765180378
018128
0673
1
18000
00000
05
25
70
0571
30
00
00
70
00
1173
1
031
73
FORD
LTD
3W63S210132
007726
1073
1
07000
00000
5°
10
10
0171
00
70
10
10
10
0171
1
035
73
MAZD
SEDA
S122A11H53
020918
1272
1
10000
10000
80
15
05
1273
75
05
00
20
00
1273
1
036
73
MERC
MARQ
3B62N532721
013989
0373
1
12000
00000
75
20
05
0571
35
20
35
10
00
9999
9
037
73
OLDS
CUTL
3J57K3M205377
022312
1172
1
10000
10000
90
02
08
1173
01
19
01
19
00
0571
1
038
73
OLDS
98
3V37T3M105790
027181
0273
1
25000
25000
60
20
20
0671
05
05
05
05
80
0271
2
039
73
PLYM
FURY
PM11G3D161H3
023865
0673
2
11000
00000
80
00
20
99 99
75
15
05
05
00
9999
1
010
73
PLYM
FURY
PHI3K3D35530
027696
0173
1
09000
15000
80
05
15
0I7I
60
20
10
10
00
9999
1
Oil
73
PONT
VENT
2Y17M3W112168
013731
0673
1
15000
00000
90
05
05
0571
90
00
05
05
00
0571
1
012
73
PONT
GRNA
2H37R3P121260
019598
1073
2
07000
00000
75
13
12
017I
00
10
25
25
10
0673
1
013
73
TOYO
CELI
RA20187976
025620
0171
1
21000
00000
20
50
30
0I7I
60
10
30
00
00
0773
1
Oil
73
VOLK
SEDA
1132168618
010162
0273
1
06000
01100
90
05
05
O67I
50
00
00
25
25
0573
2
015
73
VOLK
SEDA
I232087052
006251
0171
2
olooo
00000
70
20
10
0I7I
50
20
10
10
10
0171
2
016
72
BUI C
LESA
1L57H2X208185
010519
0572
1
17000
17000
75
25
00
0171
10
05
05
10
70
1273
2
017
72
BUIC
CENT
1P17T2X115893
016677
0372
1
20000
20000
25
25
50
0571
70
02
03
25
00
0973
1
018
72
CHEV
VEGA
1V77B2V131008
016801
0872
1
olooo
12000
10
30
30
017I
00
50
30
20
00
0I7I
1
019
72
CHEV
NOVA
1X27D2W313030
016215
0672
1
08000
08000
80
10
10
9973
00
30
00
70
00
9999
9
050
72
CHEV
MALI
1037F2K619866
011575
0772
1
05000
06575
90
05
05
067I
80
10
00
00
10
067I
3
051
72
CHEV
STAW
1M35H21107308
021720
0971
1
08000
11000
75
05
20
0671
00
10
50
30
10
9999
9
052
72
CHEV
IMPA
1M17H2H90097
025937
0171
2
10000
10000
30
60
10
0571
00
20
20
60
00
0571
2
053
72
CHEV
STAW
1D36J2K501512
025913
9973
2
12000
00000
80
10
10
9999
70
10
10
10
00
9999
2
051
72
CHEV
CAPR
1N39R2T265523
020107
0672
1
10000
10000
10
25
35
0371
00
20
10
20
50
0373
1
055
72
DATS
SEDA
PL510338661
028651
0272
1
10000
15000
50
10
10
0171
50
10
10
25
05
0171
2
056
72
DODG
DART
LH23G2B189318
0226H
1073
2
01000
00000
90
05
05
9999
98
02
00
00
00
0171
2
057
72
DODG
POLA
DL11K2D255266
021715
9972
1
01500
19000
50
00
50
1173
00
00
50
50
00
9999
1
058
72
FORD
PINT
2X11X336888
029268
0872
1
15000
15000
50
25
25
0171
70
25
00
05
00
0171
1
059
72
FORD
TORI
2H30F215079
023512
0872
1
10000
10000
75
20
05
0171
75
20
00
05
00
0171
1
060
72
FORD
LTD
2W61H218217
009921
0972
1
02000
07100
00
00
00
0671
25
50
25
00
00
9999
9
115
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DETROIT
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
tc
%S
%F
LOC
tw
%G
%T
%V
%B
LTU
w
061
72
FORD
GALA
2W58H102965
027609
0772
1
13000
14000
80
10
10
0674
75
06
01
03
05
0574
2
062
72
FORD
STAW
2W76S103703
011923
0173
2
10000
00000
40
30
30
0374
00
15
00
85
00
0973
1
063
72
FORD
THUN
2Y87N117981
038738
1172
1
11000
18000
60
10
30
0674
45
15
10
30
00
0574
2
061
72
LINC
CONT
2Y82A886423
027324
0172
1
12000
15000
50
25
25
0574
00
20
20
60
00
1273
1
065
72
MERC
MONT
2Z44S651102
011328
0972
1
06000
05300
85
10
05
9999
00
50
50
00
00
9999
9
066
72
OLDS
CUTL
3J57H2M137966
025114
0873
2
08000
00000
80
15
05
0574
70
10
00
10
10
0574
1
067
72
OLDS
98
3V37T2M571071
049183
0872
1
35000
14000
60
15
25
1173
10
10
10
05
65
1173
2
068
72
OPEL
SEDA
539557267
026272
0672
1
00000
00000
80
10
10
0574
80
05
00
15
00
0574
1
069
72
PLYM
VALI
VH23C2R319211
035144
1272
2
20000
00000
70
10
20
0474
60
10
05
20
05
0773
2
070
72
PLYM
FURY
PH41G2D340492
040878
0972
1
12000
20000
30
30
40
J0674
20
05
05
10
60
0171
3
071
72
PONT
CATA
2L39M2P385699
0375H
0772
1
18000
17000
80
15
05
0674
02
01
10
05
82
0571
4
072
72
PONT
BONN
2N69V2P381723
014979
0872
1
07000
08000
75
10
15
0173
00
10
40
20
00
0473
2
073
72
TOYO
CORO
TE27037171
016765
0272
1
08000
08000
95
04
01
0274
80
05
05
05
05
0274
1
074
72
VOLK
SEDA
1122925058
026719
1072
1
16000
10000
50
25
25
9999
50
10
10
20
10
9999
1
075
72
VOLK
SEDA
1122104808
004960
0872
1
01800
03000
98
02
00
1073
98
02
00
00
00
1073
2
076
71
AMMO
STAW
A1A187H272282
041857
0472
2
12000
12000
75
15
10
0174
60
15
15
10
00
0374
1
077
71
BUI C
LESA
^5^571X15^629
045074
0471
1
15000
15000
90
05
05
0274
80
10
05
05
00
0274
2
078
71
BUI C
ELEC
'J81391H80130
055308
0672
2
30000
20000
99
01
00
1273
00
00
00
00
00
1273
2
079
71
CADI
DEVI
683t91022569,l
036481
0374
2
09000
00000
80
10
10
9999
90
02
02
04
02
9999
9
080
71
CHEV
VEGA
11I1771U303526
023160
0671
1
09000
09000
30
65
05
0674
80
05
15
00
00
0573
4
081
71
CHEV
MALI
136371K211488
033501
0671
1
00000
00000
75
15
10
0674
70
10
05
10
05
9999
9
082
71
CHEV
MONT
138571K127026
048507
0173
2
12000
00000
85
00
15
0574
75
10
00
15
00
0574
3
083
71
CHEV
STAW
156451J170424
028274
0971
1
11000
11000
75
12
13
0574
90
05
05
00
00
0174
2
0814
71
CHEV
MALI
136671K225190
029416
0172
2
15000
10000
50
50
00
0774
40
05
15
40
00
1073
4
085
71
CHEV
IMPA
1611)711213896
043860
0971
1
15000
20000
60
30
10
0474
80
00
20
00
00
1073
9
086
71
CHRY
300
CS13T1C1129H
042679
9999
2
14000
11000
20
40
40
0474
30
10
20
40
00
1173
4
087
71
DATS
SEDA
LB110760746
037251
9972
2
00000
00000
80
10
10
9999
75
15
00
10
00
0474
4
088
71
DODG
CHAR
WP29G1A139011
039153
1270
1
11000
12000
40
00
60
0674
80
10
05
05
00
0674
4
089
71
FORD
PINT
1X11X296512
026379
9972
2
06000
12000
15
10
75
0174
90
00
10
00
00
0674
2
090
71
FORD
MAVE
1K91T126748
029631
1071
1
05500
03000
90
01
09
0474
00
50
50
00
00
9999
9
091
71
FORD
TORI
1H25F114099
040376
9971
2
10000
15000
80
10
10
0274
80
10
00
05
05
1273
1
092
71
FORD
LTD
1W63H137880
021239
1271
2
08000
08000
85
10
05
0574
00
30
60
05
05
0574
4
093
71
FORD
LTD
1W62S242006
038888
0173
2
11000
12000
95
05
00
0474
00
50
50
00
00
0274
2
094
71
MERC
MONT
16115535148
041756
0471
1
11500
13000
60
30
10
0574
20
40
20
20
00
0674
1
095
71
OLDS
CUTL
336871M125016
027467
9971
1
09000
09000
70
15
15
9999
70
00
10
10
10
9999
2
096
71
OLDS
DELT
364571M436333
051454
0572
2
15000
15000
50
25
25
0973
50
30
10
10
00
0973
4
097
71
PLYM
VAL I
YL11C1B112901
012055
0671
1
04000
04000
85
10
05
0374
00
85
05
10
00
9999
9
098
71
PLYM
SATE
RH41C1R120798
017179
0572
2
05000
07000
80
15
05
0773
00
40
30
10
20
0574
4
099
71
PONT
FIRE
223871N113796
041210
9972
1
11000
10000
80
10
10
0574
40
30
05
25
00
0773
3
100
71
PONT
GTO
242371P139567
040396
9971
1
12000
12000
10
30
60
9999
10
30
00
60
00
0374
4
101
71
TOYO
CORO
TE21002951
040648
0471
1
09000
09000
50
10
40
0474
60
10
10
20
00
0474
1
102
71
VOLK
SEDA
1113033089
025031
1171
1
11000
11000
80
15
05
9971
75
15
05
05
00
0674
4
103
70
BUI C
STAW
460160Y103225
066355
0470
2
15000
15000
85
10
05
0374
15
10
50
15
10
0574
4
xOl
70
CHEV
NOVA
113270W292130
040289
0470
1
10000
10000
75
10
15
0574
50
10
15
25
00
0574
2
105
70
CHEV
NOVA
114270W213873
091846
9970
1
12000
15000
80
10
10
0474
90
10
00
00
00
0374
4
106
70
CHEV
IMPA
164170U143850
047469
9970
1
10000
08000
90
05
05
0574
20
70
00
00
10
0773
3
107
70
CHEV
MONT
13857OFI33478
030560
9970
1
08000
07000
95
00
05
0574
60
10
20
10
00
0672
4
108
70
CHEV
IMPA
164370U101633
038224
9970
1
05000
08000
80
10
10
0171
30
20
20
20
10
9973
2
109
70
CHEV
CAPR
166390J282951
026862
0572
2
04500
05000
80
20
00
1173
00
35
00
30
35
0474
2
110
70
DODG
POLA
DM23L0F262440
054509
0970
1
12000
15000
40
20
40
0674
20
05
10
30
35
0973
2
111
70
FORD
MAVE
0X91T418122
039805
0770
1
10000
10000
99
01
00
1173
90
10
00
00
00
1173
2
112
70
FORD
FAIR
0B29F122631
067381
0572
2
15000
15000
90
05
05
9999
80
05
05
10
00
1273
4
113
70
FORD
GALA
0W56H176531
048608
9970
2
00000
00000
60
30
10
9999
70
10
10
10
00
9999
9
111
70
FORD
LTD
0W62H128391
031340
9970
1
08000
09000
00
00
00
0574
00
00
00
00
00
9973
2
115
70
FORD
LTD
0W61Y137185
064876
9999
2
08000
00000
90
00
10
9999
75
25
00
00
00
9973
1
116
70
MERC
MARA
0Z61N510116
053820
0971
2
06500
06500
85
05
10
0574
60
15
15
10
00
0674
9
117
70
OLDS
CUTL
336870M160664
022208
9999
2
11000
11000
85
13
02
0474
75
10
01
02
12
0474
4
118
70
OLDS
98
386390M17369
031699
0573
2
08000
00000
90
05
05
0374
75
10
10
05
00
0374
2
119
70
PLYM
SATE
RH23GOA122157
039088
9999
2
10000
07000
50
00
50
9999
70
30
00
00
00
9999
1
120
70
PLYM
FURY
PM29G0F260916
018402
0770
1
05000
03500
34
33
33
0274
25
25
25
00
25
0274
2
116
-------
APPENDIX B,CONT'D
LISTING OF TEST VEHICLE USE AND MAINTENANCE DATA
DETROIT
VEH
YR
MAKE
MODL
VIN
ODOM
PDATE
N
VMT1
VMT2
fc
%S
%F
LOC
%W
%G
%T
%v
%B
LTU
w
121
70
PONT
FIRE
224870N125955
036286
0670
1
00000
00000
80
20
00
0674
50
20
00
10
20
0674
2
122
70
PONT
STAU
252360P253175
059291
9970
2
00000
00000
80
10
10
0174
00
70
30
10
00
9999
2
123
70
TOYO
CORO
RT83014943
029386
0970
1
09000
07000
50
40
10
0474
25
15
10
15
35
0474
4
121
70
VOLK
SEDA
1102877904
043952
0973
2
08000
00000
10
20
70
0674
85
07
06
00
02
0274
1
125
69
AMMO
AMBA
A9C897T128631
071985
0370
2
14000
10000
75
15
10
0174
50
15
05
30
00
0174
4
126
69
BUI C
SPEC
433279Y2059
041589
0573
2
00000
00000
75
25
00
0574
90
00
05
00
00
0574
2
127
69
CHEV
BE LA
155699J290549
042919
1169
1
12000
12000
95
05
00
9999
10
00
00
00
90
1073
2
128
69
CHEV
CHEV
136399K385810
042156
0269
1
09000
09000
70
15
15
0774
60
20
00
20
00
9999
9
129
69
CHEV
IMPA
164379V200454
074042
9969
1
04000
00000
50
25
25
0274
00
75
20
05
00
0274
2
130
69
CHEV
MALI
1363798409669
090935
0771
2
12800
200 00
50
40
10
0574
50
40
00
10
00
1073
1
131
69
CHEV
STAW
164469J228456
049807
O669
1
08000
10000
90
05
05
0374
00
10
10
10
70
0174
4
132
69
CHEV
CAPR
166479F058624
067409
9971
2
12400
12400
85
05
10
0274
30
40
10
20
00
0274
4
133
69
CHRY
STAW
CP45G9C239470
069588
0369
1
10000
10000
80
00
10
0374
90
00
00
10
00
0374
2
131
69
DODG
DART
LH41B9B240240
032050
0169
1
05000
05000
40
00
60
0574
00
20
70
10
00
0174
4
135
69
FORD
FAIR
9H30F204099
051596
1170
2
12000
12000
75
10
15
0374
60
15
00
00
25
0374
4
136
69
FORD
FAIR
9H30F198495
041732
0669
1
12000
10000
90
05
05
9999
50
15
15
10
10
0673
1
137
69
FORD
MUST
9F01H148211
047150
9970
1
10000
10000
90
00
10
9999
90
10
00
00
00
9999
2
138
69
FORD
MUST
9FC2M179386
017000
0573
2
10000
00000
75
10
15
0374
00
20
20
20
40
0374
2
139
69
FORD
GALA
9W54Y221492
042035
9969
1
11000
08000
50
20
30
1073
00
15
25
40
20
9999
1
140
69
MERC
MONT
9Z54X518228
058751
1068
1
07000
06500
90
10
00
0474
00
70
20
10
00
0474
1
111
69
OLDS
98
386699M3790B8
065309
1172
2
18000
20000
50
30
20
0474
00
00
20
00
80
0474
2
142
69
PLYM
FURY
PM43F9R291802
029832
0671
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
0674
30
50
10
10
00
1173
2
143
69
PONT
TEMP
235379P366916
057853
0969
1
11000
11000
85
05
10
9999
70
03
02
20
05
0973
4
144
69
PONT
CATA
252379P239715
072646
0871
2
19000
15000
50
35
15
0574
00
15
05
05
75
0873
4
145
69
VOLK
SEDA
119323801
083598
9972
2
20000
20000
50
00
50
0674
75
05
00
20
00
0674
2
146
68
AMMO
JAVL
A8A795B110355
041923
9973
2
00000
00000
95
05
00
0674
20
70
10
00
00
9999
4
147
68
BUI C
ELEC
482578H16162
051682
9972
2
10000
15000
25
50
25
0474
05
05
05
05
80
0274
4
148
68
CADT
DEVI
L8184905
093958
0471
2
15000
14000
10
20
70
0474
70
13
02
10
05
0474
2
149
68
CHEV
MALI
13537BB168572
090947
0473
2
08000
17000
80
10
10
1173
40
10
00
40
10
1273
4
150
68
CHEV
IMPA
164678F175905
062881
0972
2
03500
07000
98
02
00
0674
00
50
50
00
00
0674
9
151
68
CHEV
IMPA
164878F190322
053656
9968
1
08000
10000
80
10
10
0174
BO
05
05
10
00
1073
2
152
68
CHEV
MALI
136378K133525
048911
1071
2
05000
10000
50
30
20
0374
60
10
20
05
05
0274
4
153
68
CHEV
MALI
136378B130138
062871
0373
2
29000
00000
80
15
05
0374
40
15
05
40
00
0374
2
154
68
DODG
POLA
DL23C8R171169
064661
0268
1
15000
15000
60
20
20
0474
60
20
20
00
00
1173
4
155
68
FORD
FAIR
8K30T238777
055761
0171
2
07000
07000
75
20
05
06 74
75
05
10
10
00
0674
4
156
68
FORD
MUST
8F01C124272
040729
0474
2
00000
00000
98
02
00
0574
80
05
15
00
00
9999
9
157
68
FORD
GALA
8W54F165097
043050
1069
2
15000
12000
00
98
02
0274
55
00
20
05
20
9999
9
158
68
FORD
TORI
8H44X129634
075337
0174
2
02000
00000
80
20
00
0574
90
05
00
05
00
0574
4
159
68
MERC
COUG
8F93F589173
058854
0968
1
17000
13000
10
20
70
0474
20
10
00
05
65
0474
3
160
68
OLDS
CUTL
3368781128228
049607
9968
1
07000
09000
60
30
10
0574
00
30
60
10
00
1173
9
161
68
PLYM
BELV
RL41D8A287599
041627
9972
2
10000
05000
90
10
00
0574
80
10
10
00
00
0374
2
162
68
PONT
BONN
262678P271851
052666
9973
2
04000
08000
80
10
10
0473
80
05
05
10
00
1173
3
163
68
VOLK
SEDA
118748291
044634
9968
2
05000
08000
50
50
00
0674
00
50
00
50
00
0772
1
164
67
AMMO
AMBA
A7KA97P100539
075509
0772
2
06000
10000
80
05
15
0774
02
01
00
92
05
1073
3
165
67
BUIC
LESA
452397H308763
048540
1167
1
12000
08000
99
01
00
0674
80
05
05
10
00
0873
1
166
67
CAD]
DEVI
J7258474Y3445
073829
9973
2
20000
00000
20
30
50
0374
80
05
05
10
00
0274
2
167
67
CHEV
CAMA
123377N224804
072280
0667
1
12000
00000
50
00
50
0474
75
05
10
00
10
1073
4
168
67
CHEV
IMPA
164697F125694
071555
9968
2
15000
15000
50
25
25
9999
75
10
10
00
05
9973
2
169
67
CHEV
IMPA
164877F242128
051615
9967
1
11000
10000
85
10
05
1073
90
05
05
00
00
0873
4
170
67
CHEV
STAW
156357F117833
102181
1068
2
25000
15000
15
70
15
1273
80
05
05
10
00
0374
9
171
67
CHRY
NEWP
CE23G73215684
052669
9970
2
07000
00000
60
20
20
0474
05
90
05
00
00
0773
3
172
67
DODG
MONA
DH43G7920O174
033032
9967
1
08000
00000
80
10
10
0574
00
50
00
50
00
9999
9
173
67
FORD
GALA
7W55C218529
078855
9967
1
13000
15000
35
50
15
0674
65
15
20
00
00
0773
4
174
67
FORD
GALA
7W550121895
063905
9973
2
04000
00000
00
99
01
0174
90
10
00
00
00
9973
4
175
67
FORD
GALA
7G55H192100
115070
0268
2
12000
20000
98
02
00
9999
98
02
00
00
00
9999
4
176
67
MERC
MONT
7Z47H568700
067972
0968
2
15000
06000
65
18
17
0574
60
05
10
25
00
1073
4
177
67
OLDS
CUTL
33617M359429
080312
1173
2
08000
00000
25
25
50
0674
70
05
01
24
00
1273
4
178
67
PLYM
BARR
BH23B72315723
041765
0673
2
20000
00000
50
25
25
9999
90
00
00
10
00
0674
4
179
67
PONT
VENT
252877P241703
070776
0172
2
10000
10000
80
10
10
0374
50
10
30
10
00
0173
2
180
67
VOLK
SEDA
117841721
069586
1072
2
18000
02000
75
20
05
0374
75
20
00
05
00
0374
2
117
-------
Appendix C - Listing of Federal Test Procedure
Results on Individual Vehicles
Legend
VEH NO, - Vehicle Number, R suffix indicates a replicate test
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the Portion of the Test or Composite.
COLD TRANS - Cold transient portion of test
COLD STAB - Cold stabilized portion of test
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test
HOT STAB - Hot stabilized portion of test (not conducted
on evaporative emissions test vehicles)
1972 FTP - Composite of cold transient and cold stabilized
tests (equivalent to 1972 federal Test Procedure)
1975 federal Test Procedure composite
Composite of hot transient and hot stabilized tests
(not conducted on Evaporative Emission Test
vehicles)
Highway Fuel Economy Test (not conducted in
Houston)
1975 FTP
HOT START
HFET
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in prams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
NOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity in grams
per mile.
FUEL ECON - Fuel Economy Calculated by the Carbon Balance Method In
miles per gallon
IHCL - Hydrocarbon Concentrations with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with the Laboratory Instrumentation in parts per
million carbon equivalent.
IHCG - Hydrocarbon Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with Carage-type Instrumentation in parts per million
Hexane equivalent (theoretically should be one-sixth IHCL)
118
-------
Appendix C (cont)
ICOL - Carbon Monoxide Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with Laboratory Instrumentation in Tier cent.
ICOG - Carbon Monoxide Concentration with Vehicle at Normal Idle,
Measured with Oarage-type Instrumentation in ner cent.
OTHER TESTS - Lists Other Emission Factors Tests Conducted on the Vehicle
MODAL - Vehicles was used in the Modal Emissions Program
EVAP - Vehicle was used in the Evaporative Emissions Program
A/C - Vehicle was used in the Air Conditioned Vehicles
Testing Program
LOADED- Vehicle was used in the Loaded Vehicles Testing Program
NONE - Vehicle was used only in the federal Test Procedure
Program
119
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
no.
YR MAKE M0DL CID
TEST
TYPE
i i
i <-j i
1 X 1
i i
i i
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
001
7U 8LJIC RIVI «55
COLD
TRANS
5.69
126.9
880.0
1.1«
8.1
COLD
STAB
2,70
67.5
973.9
0,9«
8.2
IHCL
2225PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
<4.56
116.1
755,9
0.90
9.3
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.59
121.7
910.3
0.67
8.0
I COL
2.2 X CO
ICOG
1.7 X CO
1972
FTP
«.15
96.a
928,2
1.0a
8.1
1975
FTP
3.8U
93.a
893.8
0.97
8.a
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
a.06
119,0
835,1
0.78
8.6
MODAL
HFET
2.10
81 .a
603,5
0.75
12.0
002
7a chev capr aoo
COLD
TRANS
a.59
108,8
72a.2
2.11
9.8
COLD
3TAB
2.85
52.7
76a,3
1.36
10.a
IHCL
1503PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a.71
1 16.1
609.a
1 ,ao
1 1.0
I HCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.21
110.3
702.9
0.76
10.0
ICOL
l.a X CO
ICOG
1.9 X CO
1972
FTP
3.70
80,0
7«a.e
1.73
10.1
1975
FTP
3.73
82.1
712.9
1.53
l o.a
OTHER
TESTS S
HOT
START
3.9a
1 13.2
657.a
1.07
10.5
MODAL
HFET
2.02
76.5
512.a
1.29
13.9
003
7a CHEV NOVA 350
COLD
trans
a.79
89.a
6aa ,8
1.85
11.1
COLD
STAB
a.15
82.7
602.0
0.77
11.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.9a
110.1
512,1
1,16
12.7
I HCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.2a
160. 1
530. 1
o.a6
11.1
ICOL
6.2 X CO
ICOG
6,6 X CO
1972
FTP
a,a&
86.0
622,8
1.30
11.5
1975
FTP
a.23
91.7
586,0
1.10
1 1.9
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
a.60
135.8
521 .a
0.80
11.8
MODAL
HFET
a.21
127.9
396.a
0.76
l a.5
ooa
7a DODG DART 318
COLD
TRANS
a.07
65.8
601 .6
2.53
12. a
COLD
STAB
3.37
76.2
562.5
1 .22
12,8
IHCL
3183PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.19
55.9
517,0
2,a9
la.a
I HCG
200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.7a
sa,o
532,2
0.96
13.1
ICOL
a,2 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.71
71.1
581.5
1.86
12.6
1975
FTP
3.a7
68.a
558.1
1 .85
13.1
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
3.a7
70.a
52a,8
1.71
13.7
MODAL
HFET
2.68
as.8
a25,3
2.ai
17.a
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 CARBON5HYDROGFN
RATIO
120
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS'
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NC),
YR HAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
Cfl2
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
005
74 FORD MAVE 502
COLD
TRANS
5.15
97.3
485,0
1.75
13,6
COLD
STAB
4.17
78,8
437.9
1.03
15,4
IHCL
3002PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.90
59.7
419,8
1 .58
16,9
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.90
66,0
421 ,9
1 .09
16.5
ICOL
1.4 X CO
I COG
l.l * CO
1972
FTP
1.65
87,8
461.2
1 .38
14,5
197b
FTP
4. 30
77, a
442,9
1.34
15,4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3,90
62,9
420,9
1 .33
16,7
MODAL
HFET
2.84
55,7
332,3
1.21
20,7
006
74 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
5.92
116,2
586,2
2,16
11.3
COLD
STAB
3.57
61,0
639,5
2,02
11.9
IHCL
2586PPH CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.19
60,0
541,5
2,28
13.7
IHCG
190PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,«5
62.5
617,4
1.92
12.2
ICOL
2.0 * CO
ICOG
1.8 X C0
1972
FTP
4.71
87,9
613,5
2,09
11.6
1975
FTP
4.23
72,3
601,2
2.12
12,2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.81
61,2
580,5
2,10
12.9
MODAL
HFET
2.72
55,9
401,7
2,16
17.8
007
74 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
5,49
138.6
659.0
1.67
9.9
COLD
STAB
4.11
91.2
724,4
1.41
10.1
IHCL
2405PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,83
111.7
592,3
1 .66
11.3
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,28
112.5
681,6
1 .08
10.2
ICOL
1,9 x en
ICOG
1,6 X CO
1972
FTP
4,78
114.2
692,5
1.53
10.0
1975
FTP
4,60
1 06.8
674,0
1.53
10.4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
«.55
1 12.1
638, 1
1 .36
10.7
MODAL
HFET
3.35
76.9
451.0
1 .64
15.2
008
74 PLYM SCAM 318
COLD
TRANS
5.23
76, 1
609.3
2.60
11.9
COLD
STAB
3,71
62.0
620.3
1 .68
12.2
IHCL
2537PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,78
49.4
536.6
2,68
14,2
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,19
101.2
582.8
1 .35
1 1,8
ICOL
2.9 * CO
ICOG
4,4 X CO
1972
FTP
4,45
68,9
614,9
2.13
12.0
1975
FTP
4,05
61.5
594,8
2.15
12,6
OTHER
TFSTS!
HOT
START
3,99
76.0
560.3
2,00
12.8
MODAL
HFET
2,66
40.4
407 .7
2.39
18,5
FUEL FCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH —.—GRAMS PER MILE---- FUEL
NIJ. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO CU2 NOXC EC E VAP
HFET
1.27
4.1
296,6
6.05
28.9
OUR
73 AMMO GREM 232
COLD
TRANS
2.71
35.4
393.9
5,03
19.4
COLD
STAB
1.70
14.1
377,7
2.41
21.9
I HCL
3576PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.15
17.4
335.8
4.52
24.0
I HCG
700PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
0,9 * CO
ICOG
1.3 X CO
1972
FTP
2.19
24.5
385,6
3.69
20.6
1975
FTP
2.04
19.5
369,4
3.54
21.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
MODAL f EVAP
HFET
1.27
4.1
296,6
6.05
28.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBONI HYDROGEN RATIO
12
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
1 o
1 X
1
1
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NflXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
012
73 BUIC CENT 350
COLD
TRANS
4,65
122.2
807,9
2,66
8,7
COLD
STAR
2.16
47.6
794,6
1 ,78
10,1
1HCL
1591 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.50
75.2
665,0
2,58
11.2
IHCG
70PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.30
56,7
727,2
1.34
10,8
ICOL
1 .a * cn
ICOG
0.7 X CO
1972
FTP
5.37
83.9
801 ,0
2.21
9.4
1975
FTP
2.78
70,9
761,4
2,19
10.1
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2.40
65,7
696,9
1.95
11.0
MIJDAL
HFET
2.16
78,2
540,5
2.33
13.2
013
73 BUIC RIVI 455
COLD
TRANS
8,84
165.3
716,6
1 ,99
8,8
COLD
STAB
4.92
132.0
700,9
0,99
9.6
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,39
126.7
614,3
1 ,50
10.6
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.35
141,1
678,0
0,90
9.7
ICOL
6.6 X CO
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
FTP
6.83
148.2
708,6
1.48
1975
FTP
6.15
137,5
680,2
1.34
9.7
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
5.86
134. 1
647,0
1.19
10.1
MODAL
HFET
2.62
85.6
503,8
1.21
13,7
014
73 CADI FLEE 472
COLD
TRANS
5.67
114,0
928,9
2.53
7,9
COLD
STAB
4,28
129.4
902,2
2,02
7.9
IHCL
1462PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.26
183,6
756,8
1 ,66
8.4
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
5.74
237,8
796, 3
1 ,00
7.5
ICOL
2.8 * CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
4.96
121,9
915,2
2,27
7.9
1975
FTP
4.84
141.2
867,5
2,03
8.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,51
211.4
777,1
1 .32
7.9
MODAL
HFET
3,34
127.5
607, 0
1.57
10.9
015
73 CAPR SEOA 155
COLD
TRANS
4.56
75.5
390,1
3,18
17.0
COLD
STAB
3.36
71.9
378,8
1 .53
17.7
IHCL
3641 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.29
47.3
363,2
2.86
19.8
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,24
68,4
371,5
1.38
18.1
ICOL
2.9 * CO
ICOG
3.1 * CO
1972
FTP
3.94
73,7
384,3
2.33
17.3
1975
FTP
3.59
65,8
376,8
2.24
18.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.2b
58, 1
367,5
2.10
18.9
MODAL
HFET
2.15
29,5
296,9
3,36
25.3
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
12J
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .---.GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
Nt.l. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECOn
016
73 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
2.79
55,9
378.5
2.49
18,7
COLD
STAB
1.18
28.a
336.4
1.41
23,1
IHCL
2876PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1 .06
23.8
299.5
2.05
26. 1
IHCG
UfeOPPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
ICOL
3.7 X C(1
ICOG
2.3 % CO
1972
FTP
1 ,96
41 .8
356,9
1.94
20,7
1975
FTP
1 .48
32.9
335.0
1 .82
22.7
UTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
MODAL»EVAP
HFET
0.63
14.7
275.0
1.81
29.6
016R
73 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
2,42
63,4
430,4
2,72
16.5
COLD
STAB
1,36
33.0
351,1
1.51
21,8
IHCL
2876PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
1,29
23.1
320,0
2.10
24.6
I HCG
460PPM HEXANE
HOT
stah
ICOL
3.7 * CO
ICOG
2.3 X CO
1972
FTP
1,87
47.8
389,7
2.10
18,9
1975
FTP
1 ,56
36.6
359,1
1.93
21.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL»EVAP
HFET
0,63
14.7
275.0
1.81
29.6
017
73 CHEV NOVA 250
COLD
TRANS
7,00
133,8
419.7
0.75
13.6
COLD
stab
2,64
52,2
476.2
0.98
15.7
IHCL
4U6PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,38
61.3
368.3
1 .30
18.5
I HCG
45PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.0 X CO
ICOG
0.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4,76
91,9
448.7
0.87
14,6
1975
ftp
4,03
71,8
434,4
1.02
15,8
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
start
modal,evap
HFET
2,47
19.9
318.0
2.35
24.9
017R
73 CHEV NOVA 250
COLD
TRANS
7.4«
139.7
429,8
0.74
13.2
COLD
STAB
2.36
42,6
462.0
1.11
16.5
IHCL
446PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.32
58.5
379.6
1 .58
18.2
I HCG
45PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.0 X CO
ICOG
0.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4.83
89,8
446.3
0.93
14.7
1975
FTP
4.24
67.3
432.4
1,17
16.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
modal r evap
HFET
2,47
19.9
318.0
2.35
24.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
124
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PPOCFDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
i i
O 1
«
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
CU2
m mm m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
018
73 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
TRANS
10.53
177.2
520.2
1.57
10.7
COLD
STAH
5.24
103.7
560.4
1.37
12.0
IHCL
5352PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.28
134.1
468.7
1 .64
12.7
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.67
146. 1
529.5
0.75
11.3
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
7.5 X CO
1972
FTP
7.81
139.4
540.8
l.«7
11.3
1975
FTP
6.63
127.5
526.6
1.49
11.9
OTHFR
TESTS:
HOT
START
7. 09
140.2
499.9
1.18
11.9
MODAL
HFET
4.11
1 OS, 2
394.4
1.11
15.5
019
73 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
TRANS
12.22
202.4
493.6
1.22
10.4
COLD
STAB
6.68
125.6
528.8
1,10
11.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,90
125.3
46H.3
1 .40
13.0
IHCG
720PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.51
130.3
517.7
0.87
11.9
ICOL
S.6 X en
ICOG
8.0 X CO
1972
FTP
9.38
163.0
511,7
1.16
11.1
1975
FTP
7.62
141.6
504.7
1.21
1 l.«
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.22
127.9
493.7
1.13
12.4
MODAL
HFET
4.59
112.5
363.6
0,98
16,0
020
73 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
7,40
146.3
605.3
0.86
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.77
86.2
626,6
0.90
1 1.5
IHCL
1 223PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.08
103.0
527.2
0.93
12.6
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.8 X CO
ICOG
1,5 X CO
1972
FTP
5.54
115.5
616.2
0.88
10.9
1975
FTP
4.62
103.4
594.6
0.90
11.5
OTHER
TESTSt
HOT
START
MODAL.EVAP
HFFT
4.00
141.6
404.8
0.33
13.9
O20R
73 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
9.71
163,0
605.3
0.93
9.9
COLD
STAB
4.01
98,6
623.2
0.82
1 1.2
IHCL
1223PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.40
105.8
534.0
1 .05
12.4
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.8 * CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
6.78
130,0
614.5
0.88
10,6
1975
FTP
5,31
114,1
594.7
0.91
11,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL »E V AP
HFET
c
o
•
141,6
404 .8
0,33
13.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,65 CARBON:HYDROGFN RATIO
1^5
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH ¦•"¦•"•-GRAMS PER MILE~"~"~ FUEL
NO. YP MAKE MC1DL CIO TEST TYPE HC CO CO? NOXC ECON
021
73 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
7,10
122.8
597. 6
1 .87
10.9
COLD
STAB
a.40
79.5
559.6
1 ,26
12.7
IHCL
2494PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.77
92.2
500,0
1.51
13.4
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.2 * CO
ICOG
1.3 * CO
1972
FTP
5.72
100,6
578.1
1 .56
1 1.8
1975
FTP
5.07
92.1
551 .0
1 .46
12.5
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
modal » e V AP
HFET
2.46
40,5
415,2
1.77
18.2
021 R
73 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
5.83
103. 1
555,6
1.74
12.1
COLD
STAB
3.93
66,0
519,7
1 .38
14.0
IHCL
2494PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.21
80,4
484 ,6
1.64
11.2
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.2 X CO
ICOG
\ .3 * CO
1972
FTP
4.85
84,1
537 .2
1 .56
13.0
1975
FTP
4.40
77.8
517.5
1.53
13.6
OTHER
TESTSl
HUT
START
modal»evap
HFET
2.48
40,5
415.2
1.77
18.2
022
73 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
TRANS
8,14
187.0
589.0
0.67
9.8
COLD
STAB
2.88
1 19.3
632.9
0.47
10.7
IHCL
1413PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,78
49,4
579.2
2.14
13.3
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.42
67,3
654.0
1 ,09
11.6
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
2.0 * CO
1972
FTP
5,44
152,2
611.5
0,57
10.2
1975
FTP
3,96
114,1
608,8
0,98
11.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
2.60
58,6
617,6
1 .60
12.4
MODAL
HFET
1 .06
35,5
447,2
l.«3
17.5
023
73 CHEV CAPR 400
COLD
TRANS
5,06
125,3
718.3
1 .85
9.5
COLD
STAB
3,26
80.5
689.1
1 .50
10.7
IHCL
1985PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,06
81.0
592.4
2.0 4
12.2
IHCG
204PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.9 X CO
ICOG
1.9 X CO
1972
FTP
a,14
102.3
703.3
1.67
10.1
1975
FTP
3,58
90,0
668.4
1.72
10,8
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
MODAL tEVAP
HFET
1.31
31,8
498,6
8.55
16.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A lJl.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
12b
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .....GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
Nfl, YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NfJXC ECON
023R
73 CHEV CAPR 400
COLD
TRANS
«.oi
112.6
665.3
2.53
10.4
COLD
STAB
2.61
65.7
601. 1
1.91
12.5
I HC L
1985PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.82
77.3
565.7
3.12
12.8
IHCG
204PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.9 * CO
ICOG
1.9 X CO
197?
FTP
3.29
88.5
632.3
2.21
11.4
1975
FTP
2.96
78.7
604.7
2.38
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
1.31
31.8
498.6
8.55
16.1
024
73 CHRY NFWP 400
COLD
TRANS
8.87
172.4
711.9
3.14
8,8
COLD
STAB
7.63
189.9
666, 1
1 .63
9.0
I HC L
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,59
162,2
587,8
2.13
10,3
IHCG
450PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,06
212.7
633,4
1 .26
8.9
ICOL
6.6 X CO
ICOG
8,8 X CO
1972
FTP
8,24
181,4
688,3
2,36
8.9
1975
FTP
7.61
178.5
653.9
2.08
9.3
OTHER
TESTSl
HUT
START
7.35
188,1
611.2
1.68
9.5
MODAL
HFET
4.84
117,2
515.3
1 .68
12.4
025
73 DATS 1200 71
COLD
TRANS
3.63
58.7
259.4
1.35
24.4
COLD
STAB
2.20
«3.1
296.3
0.97
23.9
I HC L
4825PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.25
«3.7
245.4
l.«7
27.1
IHCG
190PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.98
48.3
287,0
0.94
23.8
ICOL
5.3 * CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
2,89
50.7
278.3
1.15
24.2
1975
FTP
3.07
46.5
274,4
1.19
24.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.60
46, 1
266,8
1 .20
25.3
MODAL
HFET
1.20
24.1
203,4
2.22
36.2
026
73 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRANS
6.51
157.9
350,1
2.31
1^.3
COLD
STAB
4.43
103.6
348.0
1 .26
16,9
I HC L
3859PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
A.53
109.5
325.2
1 .01
17,3
IHCG
390PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5,44
130,0
34V.0
1.77
15,6
1975
FTP
4,89
116,6
342. 1
1.52
16,4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
2.71
62,0
279,9
2.11
23.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
127
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .....GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
026R
73 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRANS
7,01
162.1
331,9
1.79
14.6
COLD
STAB
4.27
106. 1
333,7
1.17
17.3
IHCL
3859PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.21
106,3
310,5
1.30
16.1
IHCG
390PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICPL
5,1 X CO
ICOG
5,2 * CO
1972
FTP
5,60
133,3
332,6
1.47
15,8
1975
FTP
4,82
117,9
326,9
1.33
16,8
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
2.71
62,0
279,9
2.11
23.0
027
73 DODG CHAR 318
COLD
TRANS
6,81
127,9
661 ,5
1,86
10,0
COLD
STAB
5.17
147, 1
614,6
1.08
10,3
IHCL
3382PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.25
127, 1
560,3
1 .63
11.4
I HC G
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.66
128,8
615,9
1.33
10,7
ICOL
5.1 * CO
ICOG
a.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5,97
137,7
637,4
1 .46
10,2
1975
FTP
5.53
137,5
609,4
1.40
10,5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
a,94
128,0
588,9
l.«7
11,0
MODAL
HFET
4,02
104,0
432,6
1 .78
14.6
028
73 FORD PINT 97
COLD
TRANS
5.40
66.2
224, 1
2,22
25,7
COLD
STAB
3.95
67.6
254,5
2,07
23,8
IHCL
3765PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.35
48.2
225,2
2,82
28,5
IHCG
41OPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
4,8 X cn
ICOG
5,4 X CO
1972
FTP
4,66
66.9
239.7
2,14
24,7
1975
FTP
4,09
61.9
240,0
2,31
25,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
modal#evap
HFET
1,40
17.3
214.6
3.68
36,0
028R
73 FORD PINT 97
COLD
TRANS
5.85
73.4
241 .4
2.49
23.7
COLD
STAB
3.05
53.0
221 . 1
1 .86
28,3
IHCL
3765PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.26
46.3
230,5
2.88
28,3
IHCG
41OPPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
ICOL
4,8 * CO
ICOG
5.4 * CO
1972
FTP
4,41
62.9
230.9
2.17
25,8
1975
FTP
3.69
S5.4
227.9
2.28
27,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
modal#evap
HFET
1.40
17.3
214.6
3,68
36,0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
128
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING DF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MflOL CID
TEST
TYPE
1
1 <->
1 X
1
B
3RAMS 1
CO
PER MILE-
C02
mm mmm
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
029
73 FORD MAVE 250
COLD
TRANS
6,00
113,9
454.0
2,10
13,6
COLD
STAB
a,78
124,9
452,9
1.01
13,4
IHCL
3183PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,57
116,5
390,5
1,34
15,0
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
a,78
137,1
418,2
0,81
13.7
ICOL
a,2 * CO
I COG
3,4 * CO
1972
FTP
5,37
119,6
453,4
1,54
13,5
1975
ftp
5,25
120,3
435,8
1.33
13.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,16
127,1
404 .7
1,07
14.3
MODAL
HFET
4,01
93.1
303.8
1.22
%
19.2
030
73 FORD MAVE 302
COLD
trans
6,09
77,0
555.8
1 .44
12.7
COLD
STAB
4,83
62,3
491 .2
1.18
14.7
IHCL
2623PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a,66
49.8
464,9
1.34
15.9
IHCG
115PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a,78
61,3
471 ,0
1.12
15,2
ICOL
0,3 % CO
ICOG
0,3 * CO
1972
FTP
5,44
69,5
522,6
1 ,30
13,7
1975
FTP
5,04
61,9
497,4
1 ,28
14,5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4,72
55,7
468,0
1.23
15,6
MODAL
HFET
3,23
34,7
423,5
1,42
18,2
031
73 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
4,70
96,6
681 ,6
1,95
10,5
COLD
STAB
4,52
57,2
720.8
2,07
10,8
IHCL
2773PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,64
60,5
604.4
2.23
12,5
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1,7 X CO
ICOG
1.6 X CO
1972
FTP
4,60
76,3
701,7
2,01
10,6
1975
FTP
4,31
66,3
680.3
2,09
11.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL » E VAP
HFET
2,62
37,3
416.6
2.16
18,4
03 1 R
73 FORD TORI 351
COLD
trans
5,03
98, 1
679, 1
1 ,78
10,5
COLD
STAB
4,69
63, 1
714,7
1 .86
10.7
IHCL
2773PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,99
67,8
603,8
1 .88
12.3
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1,7 X CO
ICOG
1,6 X CO
1972
FTP
4,85
r\j
•
o
GO
697,3
1,82
10,6
1975
FTP
4,56
71,8
676,5
1,85
11,0
UTHFR
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL »E V AP
HFET
2,62
37,3
416,6
2,16
18,4
FUFL ECUNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON{HYDROGEN RATIO
12V
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH ..-..GRAMS HER MILE-- — - FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CIO TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
032
73 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
6.57
1 14.2
568.6
2.21
11.5
COLD
STAB
4 .99
79.4
57a. a
1.75
12.4
I HC L
3153PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.01
86.3
51U.3
2.06
13.3
I HC G
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.6 X CO
ICOG
2.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.76
96.a
571 .6
1.97
12.0
1975
FTP
5.33
80.6
556,5
1.93
12.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
3.69
59.3
356.0
2.39
19.3
032R
73 FORD TORI 351
COLD
trans
6.55
98.2
525.1
2.04
12.7
COLD
STAB
A.51
<19.8
466,9
l.«5
15.9
I HC L
3153PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.58
47.1
431 ,9
2.25
17.1
I HC G
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.6 % CO
ICOG
2.2 * CO
1972
FTP
5,50
73.3
495.2
1.74
14.1
1975
FTP
4.95
59.2
469.4
1.79
15.4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
3.69
59.3
356.0
2.39
19.3
033
73 FORD ST AW 400
COLD
trans
5.52
136.9
746.0
1.87
9.1
COLD
STAB
3.96
61.8
764.0
1.59
10.2
IHCL
2160PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.97
75.6
<>29.7
1.79
11.7
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
ICOL
0.5 X CO
ICOG
0.4 X CO
1972
FTP
4.72
98.4
755.2
1.73
9.6
1975
FTP
4.29
81.3
723.0
1 .70
10.3
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
2.65
37.8
484.5
1 .99
16.1
033R
73 FORD STAW 400
COLD
TRANS
5,20
120.7
754.1
2.06
9.2
COLD
STAB
3.90
56.0
784.7
1.66
10.0
IHCL
2160PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.24
76,5
645.5
1.87
11.4
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
0.5 X CO
ICOG
0.4 * CO
1972
FTP
4.53
87.5
769.8
1.85
9.6
1975
FTP
4.27
75.2
739.7
1.80
10.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
2.65
37.8
484.5
1 .99
16.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1*1.85 CARBON J HYDROGEN HATIO
130
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MflDL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
X I
O I
1
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE-
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
034
73 FORD LTD 400
COLD
TRANS
4.09
104.3
746,7
1 .62
9.6
COLO
STAB
2.89
38.5
693.0
1.41
11,6
IHCL
3106PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,18
65.0
607 , 1
l.«3
12,3
IHCG
360PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
4,2 X CO
ICOG
4,2 * CO
1972
FTP
3.47
70.5
719.1
1.51
10.6
1975
FTP
3.22
59.6
680 .4
1 .46
11.3
OTHER
tests;
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
2.16
46.5
484.3
1 .67
15.7
034R
75 FORD LTD 400
COLD
TRANS
4.29
99.0
742.2
1 .75
9.7
COLO
STAB
3.11
60.9
678.1
1.37
11.3
IHCL
3106PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.12
77.5
659.3
1.34
11.2
IHCG
360PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
ICOL
4.2 * CO
ICOG
4,2 * CO
1972
FTP
3,68
79,4
709,3
1,55
10,5
1975
FTP
3,36
73.5
686.3
1.44
10,9
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
MODAL , E V AP
HFET
2.16
46.5
484.3
1 .67
15.7
035
73 MA ZD RX2 70
COLD
TRANS
6.81
48.2
452.6
0.71
16.1
COLD
STAB
2.23
24.1
568.4
0.60
14.5
IHCL
1080PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.59
55.5
341 .4
0.84
19.5
IHCG
70PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3.4 * CO
ICOG
1.7 X CO
1972
FTP
4.46
35.8
512,0
0.65
15.2
1975
FTP
4.95
37.8
481 .2
0,69
16,0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
1 .64
17.4
348,0
0,94
23,3
035R
73 MAZD RX2 70
COLD
TRANS
8.30
53.7
478.9
0.96
15.1
COLD
STAB
3.16
33.0
559.0
0 .69
14.3
IHCL
1080PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.41
63.6
373.9
0.81
17.6
IHCG
70PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3,4 * CO
ICOG
1,7 X CO
1972
FTP
5,66
43.1
520.0
0.82
14.7
1975
FTP
5.97
45.8
490 .9
0.78
15.3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
1 .64
17.4
348.0
0.94
23.3
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A III,85 CARHQNiHYDROGEN RATIO
1^1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH --.--GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NQXC ECON
036
73 MERC BROU 429
COLD
TRANS
10.01
146.6
579.0
1.69
10.6
COLD
STAB
12,75
184.0
481 . 1
0.83
10,9
IHCL
9403PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.31
131.8
491 .8
1.26
12.2
IHCG
660PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
5.2 * CO
1972
FTP
1 1.41
165.8
52B.7
1.24
10.8
1975
FTP
10.94
161.7
504.5
1.13
11.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
4.03
71.4
387.9
1.26
17.3
036R
73 MERC BROU 429
COLD
TRANS
9.37
121.1
580.9
1.98
11.1
COLD
STAB
11.55
171.0
496.6
0.83
11.1
IHCL
9403PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.26
117.7
462.8
1 .26
13.2
IHCG
660PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
5.1 * CO
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
FTP
1 0.49
146.7
537.6
1.39
11.1
1975
FTP
10.18
145.8
504.8
1.19
1 1 .6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
4.03
71.4
387,9
1 .26
17.3
037
73 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRAMS
3.92
54.2
561 .3
2.69
13.5
COLD
STAB
2.6a
22.1
497.5
1 .98
16,4
IHCL
2023PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.12
30.6
464.8
2.60
16.9
IHCG
30OPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
0.2 * CO
ICOG
0.3 X CO
1972
FTP
3.36
37.7
528.5
2.33
14.8
1975
FTP
3.22
31.2
501 .8
2.30
15.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL»E VAP
HFET
l.7a
9.6
340.5
2.65
24.6
037R
73 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
trans
3.51
45.8
498.6
2.98
15.3
COLD
STAB
2.40
20.0
412.7
2.09
19,6
IHCL
2823PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.49
39.8
456. 1
3.24
16,8
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
0.3 X CO
1972
FTP
2.94
32.5
454.5
2.52
17.2
1975
FTP
2.93
30.9
442.7
2.59
17.7
OTHER
TESTS*
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
1.74
9.6
340.5
2.65
24.6
FUFL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME
a 1:1.
85 CARBl)N:HYOROGEN
RATIO
1^2
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DfcNVER
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO, YR MAKE MflDL CIO TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
038
73 OLDS CUTL 455
COLD
TRANS
3,10
70.8
813,5
2.96
9,2
COLD
STAB
I .80
2b,2
829,8
2.33
10.1
IHCL
2102PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1 .82
20.2
732.1
2.81
11,5
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.5 X CO
I COG
0.8 * CO
1972
ftp
2.58
17,9
836.5
2,64
9.6
1975
FTP
2.14
33.9
805.6
2,60
10.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
0.86
9.6
602.0
2,73
14.i
03BR
73 OLDS CUTL 155
COLD
TRANS
2 , 7*1
55,1
810.6
3.00
9,8
COLD
STAB
1 .89
26,5
798.3
2.28
10,5
IHCL
2 1 02PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1,81
20,5
690.8
2,80
12.2
T HCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
1.5 * CO
ICOG
0.8 X CO
1972
FTP
2.30
40,6
604.3
2,63
10.1
1975
ftp
2,oa
30,9
771 .1
2.58
10,7
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
0.86
9,6
602,0
2,73
14.3
039
73 PLYM VALI 318
COLD
TRANS
6.51
99. 1
514.9
2,74
12,8
COLD
STAB
4.18
49,9
464,5
1,92
16,0
IHCL
3482PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,24
46,0
425. 1
3,15
17,4
I HC G
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3,2 * CO
ICOG
3,4 X CO
1972
FTP
5.32
73,9
489.0
2.32
14,3
1975
FTP
4,69
59.1
464.1
2.43
15.5
OTHER
TESTS X
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
3.68
36,9
38B.5
3.86
19.4
039R
73 PLYM VALI 318
COLD
TRANS
6,26
84,8
514.0
2.98
13,3
COLD
STAB
3,97
47,8
466,9
2.05
16,0
IHCL
3482PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,02
43,7
429.3
3.21
17,4
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3,2 X CO
ICOG
3,4 % CO
1972
FTP
5,08
65,8
489,8
2,50
14.6
1975
FTP
4,47
54.4
466.3
2.57
15.7
OTHER
TFSTS!
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
3,68
36,9
388.5
3,86
19.4
FUE-L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
13j
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PER MILE-—— FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
040
73 PLYM FURY 360
COLD
TRANS
5.40
130.3
662,0
3.64
10.0
COLD
STAB
4.50
125.0
622.0
2.36
10.7
IHCL
3059PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.03
93.6
546.4
3.63
12,6
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
6.0 X CO
1972
FTP
a,94
127.6
641,5
2.9B
10,3
1975
FTP
a.56
117.4
609.4
2.98
11.0
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
STAHT
MODAL/EVAP
HFET
2.73
34.5
466.2
4.79
16,7
040R
73 PLYM FURY 360
COLD
TRANS
5.35
123.8
675.4
3,62
10,0
COLD
STAB
4.31
114.1
635.7
2.43
10.7
I HCL
3059PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.97
85.6
557.5
3.68
12.6
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
6.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4,82
118.8
655,0
3.01
10.4
1975
FTP
4.43
108.2
622, 3
3.03
11.0
OTHER
TESTSS
HOT
START
MODAL r EVAP
HFET
2.73
34.5
468.2
4.79
16.7
041
73 PONT LEMA 350
COLD
TRANS
6.44
96.7
718.1
3.27
10.0
COLD
STAB
5.15
100.6
698.2
2.63
10.2
I HCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.97
87.1
563.3
4.36
12.3
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.10
135.5
597.7
3.08
10.7
ICOL
6.6 X CO
ICOG
8.6 X CO
1972
FTP
5.78
98.7
707,9
2.94
10.1
1975
FTP
5.65
96.1
664 .9
3.24
10.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.55
112.0
581 .0
3.71
11.4
MODAL
HFET
4.15
76.9
453.9
2.99
15.1
042
73 PONT CATA 400
COLD
TRANS
5.42
68.0
675.8
6.71
11.1
COLD
STAB
3.84
28.3
671.5
3.72
12.2
I HCL
1270PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.59
24.5
571 .4
4.76
14.3
IHCG
310PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
2.9 X C(1
1972
FTP
4.61
47.7
673.6
5.18
11.6
1975
FTP
4.10
35.6
644.6
4.64
12.4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
modal,evap
HFET
2,46
11.2
465,4
5.50
18,1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBONjHYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO, YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
042R
73 PONT CATA 400
COLO
TRANS
5,38
65,8
682.a
7.13
11.1
COLO
STAB
3,83
28.1
657,0
3.81
12,a
IHCL
1270PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,64
25. tt
575,0
5.21
11.2
I HC G
3 1 0PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
ICOL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
2.9 X CO
1972
FTP
4,59
46.4
669, 4
5.43
11.7
1975
FTP
4,10
35.2
639,6
a,89
12,5
OTHER
TESTS J
HOT
START
modal,evap
HFET
2,46
11.2
465.4
5.50
18.1
043
73 TOYO CORC1 120
COLD
TRANS
a,36
72.6
458,8
3.85
15.1
COLD
STAB
3.22
52.9
410,1
2.30
17.6
IHCL
2785PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.97
41.3
393,9
3.87
19.0
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.56
64 .9
304,8
2.01
17,8
ICOL
1.1 % CO
ICOG
2.3 * CO
1972
FTP
3.78
62,5
433,8
3.06
16,3
1975
FTP
1.10
53.8
415,8
3.06
17.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.27
53,4
389,2
2,92
18.4
MODAL
HFET
2.22
27.9
328.4
4,47
23.4
044
73 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
4,00
77.8
248,5
2,40
23.1
COLD
STAB
2.39
58.4
225.8
1.77
27.3
IHCL
2744PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,44
54.9
224. 1
2.26
27,9
I HCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3.4 X CO
ICOG
3.4 X CO
1972
FTP
3,18
67.8
236.8
2,08
25,1
1975
FTP
2.74
61.5
230.1
2,04
26,5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL »E V AP
HFFT
1.29
32.1
211,3
2,90
33.4
044P
73 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
4.29
86.9
260,8
2.32
21,6
COLD
STAB
2.62
69,8
237,7
1 .64
25,0
IHCL
2744PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
2.49
67,2
221,2
1 .68
26,5
I HCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
ICOL
3.4 * CO
ICOG
3.4 X CO
1972
FTP
l.«3
78.2
248,9
1.^7
23,2
1975
FTP
2.93
72,7
237,9
1,79
24,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
MODAL,EVAP
HFET
1.29
32,1
211.3
2,90
33,4
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBONI HYDROGEN RATIO
135
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
nN individual vehicles in denver
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC CO C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
045
73 VOLK STAW 103
COLD
TRANS
5.46
41.5
410.7
3.90
18.0
COLD
STAB
2,66
49. 1
376.3
2.44
19.2
IHCL
3183PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.80
51.8
333.3
3.09
20.8
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,80
56.4
356.4
2.22
19.6
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
4.03
45.4
393,1
3.15
18.6
1975
FTP
3.57
48. i
371.6
2.93
19.3
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
3.29
54.1
345.2
2.64
20, 1
MflDAL
HFF T
1.67
21.1
284.0
3.40
27.5
046
72 RUIC SKYL 350
COLD
TRANS
6.80
147.7
534,2
1.79
11.3
COLD
STAB
4.14
111.0
548,4
1 .49
12.1
IHCL
7561 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.61
108.2
489.2
2.08
13.2
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.62
128.5
546. 1
1.27
11,6
ICOL
S.6 X CO
ICOG
a.6 x co
1972
FTP
5.43
128.8
541 .5
1 .64
11.7
1975
FTP
4.82
117.9
529.0
1.71
12.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.61
118.6
518,4
1 .66
12,3
MODAL
HFET
2.99
71.3
398.7
2.44
17.1
047
72 BUIC CENT 455
COLD
TRANS
5.12
98.8
902,7
7.20
8,3
COLD
STAB
3,07
41.8
925.2
5.02
8,9
IHCL
2195PPM CARBON
HOT
T PANS
«.17
85.2
717,3
5.40
10.3
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,60
72.3
862.0
3.35
9,0
ICOL
5.a X CO
ICOG
4.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4.07
69.5
914.3
6.08
8,6
1975
FTP
3.81
65.8
862,8
5.58
9.1
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
3.88
78.6
791 .6
4.35
9.6
MODAL
HFET
2.22
61.2
577.5
4.46
13.0
OUR
72 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
3,67
76.5
315.1
1.53
19.9
COLD
STAB
2.55
62,0
377, 1
0,86
18.4
IHCL
3910PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.31
50.6
304.0
1.39
22.7
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.82
68.9
361 .4
0.76
18.5
ICOL
4.1 X CO
ICOG
3.7 X CO
1972
FTP
3,10
69,1
346,9
1.19
19,1
1975
FTP
2.72
61,9
343,8
1.15
19,7
OTHER
TESTSI
HUT
START
2.57
60.0
333,5
1.07
20,4
MODAL
HFET
1.10
36.3
216.5
1.30
32.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBONtHYDROGFN RATIO
136
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INOIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MOOL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
049
72 CHEV NOVA 250
COLD
TRANS
3.76
52.7
475.1
3,46
15.6
COLD
STAB
2.68
43.2
467.4
1.53
16.3
IHCL
2387PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.38
41.4
387.7
3,08
19.1
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.20
59.3
461.6
1.21
15,7
ICOL
2.9 * CO
I COG
2.7 X CO
1972
FTP
3.20
4 7.8
471.1
2.47
16.0
1975
FTP
3.10
44. 7
4 4 6,9
2.37
16.8
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
3.29
50.6
425,6
2.12
17.2
MODAL
HFET
1.85
37.0
352.6
3.59
21.3
050
72 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
TRANS
10.95
128,2
523,7
2,56
11.7
COLD
STAB
6.49
100.3
594,3
1,81
1 1.5
IHCL
1442PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.40
110,6
465,6
1.97
13.4
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.23
128,8
562,8
1.30
11.3
ICOL
0.5 * CO
ICOG
0.6 x en
1972
FTP
8,66
113.9
559,9
2.18
1 1.6
1975
ftp
7.68
109.0
543.8
2.01
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.32
120.0
515.5
1.63
12.2
modal
HFfcT
4. 30
80.3
337 .2
1.75
18.6
051
72 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
6.12
91,8
696.3
5.23
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.23
39,2
721 .5
3.75
11.?
IHCL
308UPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.81
48,6
601 .0
4.99
12.9
IHCG
210PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.78
52.7
661 .6
3.39
1 1.7
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4.64
64,8
709,2
4,47
10,7
1975
FTP
4,00
52,8
682,8
4,40
11.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,79
50,7
632, 1
4.17
12.3
MODAL
HFET
2.9U
26,8
485,3
5,55
lb.6
052
72 CHEV NI1VA 350
COLD
trans
7.26
86.5
538,1
4.33
12.7
COLD
STAB
5.31
75.3
519.7
2.0]
14,6
IHCL
7064PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.45
72.4
466. 1
S.70
14.9
IHCG
400PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
5.29
77.6
504.8
1.88
13.8
ICOL
6.0 X CO
ICOG
5.2 * en
1972
FTP
6,26
80.8
528.7
3.14
13.1
1975
FTP
5,75
76.8
506.7
2.96
13.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,36
75.0
485.9
2.76
14.3
MODAL
HFET
4.79
HI .2
420.6
3.76
15.8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1 :1 .
85 CARBUNIHYORUGEN
RATIO
137
-------
APPENDIX CiCflMT'O
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1 1
• <_> 1
1 X 1
• 1
• 1
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
053
72 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
7.39
150.9
690.5
2.98
9.2
COLD
STAB
0.75
107. 1
576.9
1 .80
11.7
IHCL
7869PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.20
100.9
571.8
3.18
11.9
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.17
121.2
560.7
1.73
11.5
ICOL
5,1 * en
ICOG
9.5 X Cfl
1972
FTP
6.00
130,0
630.1
2.J<>
10.3
1975
FTP
5.40
115.0
600.1
2.05
11.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5,20
111.0
568. 1
2.03
11.7
MODAL
HFET
0,00
60.9
002,0
3.31
16.1
050
72 CHEV STAW O00
COLD
TRANS
7.98
167.0
710.7
0.22
8.8
COLD
stab
0,20
09. 1
778.1
0.68
10.2
IHCL
3909PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
0.99
89.6
658.2
5.01
10,9
IHCG
290PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0.35
52.8
752.6
0.56
10,0
I COL
3.3 * CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
6.06
106.8
707.2
0.05
9.5
1975
FTP
5.23
85.1
731.6
0.67
10.1
UTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
0 .66
70,7
706,7
0.78
10,7
MODAL
HFe T
0.37
86,0
509, 1
5.03
13.5
055
72 DATS SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
0.25
20.6
309,5
3.59
22, 1
COLD
STAB
3.90
29.2
337,3
2.17
22.0
IHCL
0775PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.78
22.0
288, 7
3.71
26,0
IHCG
3O0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0.20
31.1
327,3
2.06
22,8
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
3.9 X CO
1972
FTP
0.07
27.0
303,3
2.86
22,3
1975
ftp
3.90
26.0
326,0
2.89
23,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
0.00
26,9
308,5
2,86
20,0
MODAL
HFE T
1.21
6,8
232,7
3.01
35,9
056
72 DODG DART 318
COLD
TRANS
8.98
109.2
099.5
2.20
1 1.6
COLD
ST AH
7.71
187. 1
072,6
1.10
11.2
IHCL
5273PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,95
107.5
011,1
1,52
13.3
IHCG
375PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.75
205.3
009,7
0.91
11.1
ICOL
6.2 X CO
ICOG
7.8 * CO
1972
FTP
8.33
168.7
085.7
1.67
11.0
1975
FTP
7.76
168.2
061 .2
1.07
1 1.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.87
177.2
030,9
1.20
12.1
MODAL
HFE T
0.57
96,0
317,7
1.35
18.3
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 111.
85 LARBONSHYDROGEN
RATIO
13d
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
1
1
X • 1
uj O I
> 2 1
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
•--••GRAMS 1
HC CO
3ER MILE-
C02
NflXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
057
72 DODG POLA 360
COLD
TRANS
12.69
259.1
576.7
1.79
8.7
COLD
STAB
10,88
346.7
572,4
0.90
7.7
IHCL
5770PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
11.51
291,2
481 ,6
1 .26
9.1
IHCG
620PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1«.32
420.3
537,5
0.63
7.1
ICOL
6.6 X CO
ICOG
7.2 X CO
1972
FTP
11,76
304.1
574,5
1.33
8.1
1975
ftp
1 1 .44
313.0
548,1
1.18
8.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
12.95
357.5
510,3
0.93
tt.O
MODAL
HFET
6.98
?25.0
351 .4
0.72
12.2
058
72 FORD PINT 122
COLD
TRANS
«.33
92.8
358,7
4.13
17.1
COLD
STAB
2.83
43.4
358.4
4,49
20.4
IHCL
2265PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.53
40.4
328.3
5,05
22.2
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.75
38.6
354,5
4.35
20.9
ICOL
1,4 X CO
ICOG
1.4 X CO
1972
FTP
3.56
67,4
358,6
«.31
lb.7
1975
ftp
3.06
52,9
350,1
«.57
20.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,64
39.5
341 ,7
4,69
21.5
MODAL
HFET
1.73
22,7
275,6
4.82
28.0
059 '
72 FORD MAVE 302
COLD
TRANS
5.69
57.6
510.3
4.17
14.3
COLD
STAB
4,05
59,5
505.9
2.26
14.5
IHCL
3283PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.34
44,9
438.8
4.00
17.0
IHCG
265PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.34
84,0
4R0.6
1 .67
14.2
ICOL
U.3 X CO
ICOG
5.6 X CO
1972
FTP
4.65
58,6
508. 1
3.19
14.4
1 975
FTP
4,48
55,1
488.2
3.14
15.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.34
65,0
460.3
2.81
15.4
MODAL
HFET
3,20
39,6
338.9
3,25
21.6
060
72 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
7,91
73.7
618.5
6,85
11.7
COLD
STAB
9,71
54.0
635.0
5,05
11.8
IHCL
6566PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7,25
63,4
534,4
6.39
13.5
IHCG
800PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7,25
67.7
618.4
4.72
1 1.9
ICOL
2.6 * CO
ICOG
2.2 X CO
1972
FTP
8,83
63.6
627.0
5.92
1 1.8
1975
FTP
8.65
60,7
603,7
5.80
12.2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
7.25
65,6
577,5
5.53
12,6
MODAL
HFET
4.44
56,9
414,4
5.67
17.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBONjHYDROGEN RATIO
139
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH --.--GRAMS PER MILE-—— FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
CO?
NOXC
ECON
061
72 FORD ST A w 351
COLD
TRANS
5,6a
102.3
610,3
5,44
11.3
COLD
STAB
<4,54
91.5
627.8
2.89
11.3
IHCL
3830PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.11
87.2
557,9
5,07
12.5
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.55
115.2
600.8
2,42
11.1
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
3.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.00
96.7
619.3
«.13
11.3
1975
FTP
4.93
92.6
604. 7
4,03
1 1.6
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4.82
101.6
579,9
3.71
11.A
modal
HFET
3,57
69.6
419,0
3,91
16,4
062
72 FORD LTD 400
COLD
TRANS
7,04
119,9
682, 1
4,44
9,9
COLD
STAB
4,52
108.8
670.2
3.63
10.4
IHCL
3731 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.21
104.8
589.0
4.90
11.5
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
4,94
131.4
614.5
2.89
10.6
ICOL
5,3 * CO
ICOG
2,8 X CO
1972
FTP
5,75
114.2
676.0
4.03
10.2
1975
FTP
5.52
110.0
650,?
4.16
10.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.56
1 18.4
602. 1
3,87
11.0
MODAL
HFET
3.46
77.0
466,3
4.84
14.8
063
72 FORD THUN 4?9
COLD
TRAMS
5,40
113,0
633,8
3.88
10,7
COLD
STAR
5,10
143.6
556,4
2.44
11.1
IHCL
B095PPM CAHBON
HOT
TRANS
4,76
97.0
506. 0
3.94
13,2
IHCG
500PPM HEXANE-
HOT
STAB
5,28
158.6
511.3
1 .96
11.«
ICOL
5,1 * CO
ICOG
10.0 * CO
1972
FTP
5,25
128.7
594.0
3.14
10,9
1975
FTP
5,07
124.3
558.6
3.16
1 1.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,03
128,6
508.7
2.92
12,2
modal
HFfc T
3,10
51.0
402.6
3.7fc
18.0
064
72 LINC CONT 460
COLD
TRANS
10.67
191.9
667,8
4,91
0,8
COLD
stab
7.07
125. 1
669,3
5.00
10,0
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.1 0
104.8
614,2
6.78
11.1
IHCG
1300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.81
1 30.6
645, 1
4.64
10,2
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
4.8 X CO
1972
FTP
8.82
157.6
668.6
4.96
9,4
1975
FTP
7,55
133.5
653.7
5.48
10,0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6,46
118.0
630.0
5.68
10,6
MODAL
HFET
3,67
77,4
485,4
5.48
1«.3
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBHN:HYDROGEN wATIO
140
-------
APPENDIX C t COM ' D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
X (
O 1
1
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
065
72 MERC MONT «00
COLD
TRANS
6.77
92.5
796.8
P.68
9.2
COLD
STAB
«.7l
55.0
775.0
6.89
10.1
IHCL
2686PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.21
67.5
688.3
9.35
10.9
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
«.53
66.4
761 .3
6.33
10.1
ICOL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
a.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5.71
73.2
785.6
7.76
9.7
1975
FTP
5.56
66.3
755.5
7.9«
10.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.35
67. 0
725.0
7.80
10.5
MODAL
HFET
1.25
53.1
551.2
8.27
13.7
066
72 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
8,46
160,2
606,3
3,21
10,0
COLD
STAB
4.14
30,6
650,9
3,75
12.5
IHCL
31 14PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,12
102.3
533,4
3,90
12.4
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.30
40,6
633.9
3.53
12.5
ICOL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
1.0 X CO
1972
FTP
6,25
93.7
629,2
3,49
11.1
1975
FTP
5,60
77.6
609.0
3,68
11.9
OTHER
TFSTS!
HOT
START
5.19
70.6
585,0
3,71
12.5
MODAL
HFET
3.35
38.4
446,9
5,96
17.1
067
72 OLDS DELT 455
COLD
TRANS
2,86
55.4
726.6
4.91
10.0
COLD
STAB
2,09
21.7
756.2
2.91
11.1
IHCL
2729PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.34
25.4
627.4
4.90
13.2
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.27
25.2
726.3
2.42
11.5
ICOL
3.9 X CO
ICOG
4.0 X CO
1972
FTP
2.46
38. 1
741 .8
3.89
11.0
1975
FTP
2.32
29.8
714.3
3.86
1 1 .6
OTHER
TESTS t
HOT
START
2.30
25.3
678.2
3.63
12.2
MODAL
HFET
1.67
11.8
450.5
9.41
18.7
068
72 OPEL 1900 116
COLD
TRANS
8.78
117.6
322.9
2.20
16.6
COLD
STAB
3,90
58,9
353.5
1.80
19.4
IHCL
3681 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.34
47.3
286.3
2.36
23,9
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
3.78
60.2
330. 1
1.77
20.3
ICOL
5.0 X CO
ICOG
5.4 X CO
1972
FTP
6.28
87.5
338,6
2.07
17,9
1975
FTP
4.77
68.0
328.4
2.10
19.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.57
53.9
308,0
2.06
21.9
MODAL
HFET
3.39
23.5
241.5
2.79
30.7
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A ltl.
85 CARBON:HYDROG£N
RATIO
141
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
¦ i_>
1 X
i
i
SRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE-
CU2
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
069
72 PLYM DUST 19ft
COLD
TRANS
6.ea
127.6
328.2
2.18
16.1
COLD
STAR
8,09
137.3
308.4
1 .66
16.1
IHCL
3979PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.22
97.2
307.6
2.59
18.7
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,20
124.3
313.5
1.61
16.9
ICOL
4.5 X CO
I COG
3.6 X CO
1972
FTP
7,48
132.6
318.0
1.91
16.1
1975
FTP
6.75
124,1
312.3
2.03
16.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.76
111.1
310.6
2.08
17.7
MODAL
HFET
2.46
58.3
260.8
3.<48
2a.6
070
72 PLYM SATE 318
COLD
TRANS
6.93
94,1
583.5
3.68
11.8
COLD
STAB
5,61
6a.2
563.a
2.98
13.0
I HCL
1611 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.31
78.3
a93.2
3,36
la.o
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.53
73.1
532.5
2.44
13.3
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
6.25
78.8
573.2
3.32
12.4
1975
FTP
5.80
74.a
548.1
3.23
13.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.42
75.6
513.3
2.89
13.7
MODAL
HFET
5,36
99.2
403.8
2.R3
15,4
071
72 PONT LEMA 350
COLD
TRANS
9.38
161.8
579.6
1.89
10,3
COLD
STAB
4.69
93.7
646.5
1.91
11.0
I HCL
6815PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,67
89.4
520.3
2.79
13.1
IHCG
480PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.82
97.2
608.4
1.77
11.4
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
7.3 * CO
1972
FTP
6.97
126.8
613.9
1 .90
10.6
1975
FTP
5.67
106.7
597.5
2.15
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4,75
93.4
565.5
2.27
12.2
MODAL
HFET
3.27
46.6
402.7
3.29
18.3
072
72 PONT BONN 455
COLD
TRANS
7,47
138.8
762. 1
3.81
8,8
COLD
STAB
4.6?
69,8
804.7
2.58
9,6
I HCL
6168PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.53
90.5
635.7
3.89
11.2
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,26
99. 1
751.1
2.59
9.6
ICOL
6.2 X CO
ICOG
3.5 X Cfl
1972
FTP
6.01
103.4
764.0
3. 1 8
9.2
1975
FTP
5,47
90.0
748.9
3.20
9.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,39
94.9
694.9
3.2?
10.3
MODAL
HFET
3,95
75.6
520.2
4.36
13.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 carbon:hydrogfn
RATIO
142
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
Nf.l,
YR MAKE MODI CID
TEST
TYPE
t i
• <_> i
1 I 1
i i
i i
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE-
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
073
72 TUYO CORO 97
COLD
TRANS
a,59
63.9
345.2
3,64
19.3
COLD
STAB
3,75
50, 1
313,0
1.83
22,0
IHCL
4268PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.30
49.5
297. 1
2.89
23,0
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,47
48,2
306,5
1.87
22,6
ICOL
3,3 X CO
ICOG
1,5 X CO
1972
FTP
a, 16
56.8
328.6
2.71
20,6
1975
FTP
3.60
52.8
315.3
2.50
21.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.39
40,9
301,9
2.37
22,8
MODAL
HFtT
2,34
37.6
250. 1
3.42
28,0
074
72 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
4,91
57,3
300, 1
3,18
21,9
COLD
STAB
4,62
70.8
301, 1
1,56
2 0,8
IHCL
3462PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,66
49.4
267,9
2,54
24,8
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,34
68,7
302.0
1,50
21,0
ICOL
3.8 X CO
I C(1G
3,4 X CO
1972
FTP
4,76
64.2
300.6
2.35
21,3
1975
FTP
u.m
62.0
291.7
2.17
22.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4,01
59.3
285.4
2,01
22.7
MODAL
HFtT
1 ,62
30,6
216,4
2,69
32.9
075
72 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
8.01
94,9
293.0
3,86
19,0
COLD
STAB
6.99
106,9
311.7
1 .98
17.7
IHCL
3283PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,82
84,3
278.0
3.02
20,7
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,64
100,2
322.8
2,40
17,7
ICOL
2.7 X CO
IC(1G
2.4 X CO
1972
FTP
7,49
101.1
302.6
2.89
18,3
1975
FTP
6,88
98.1
298.4
2.66
18,7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6,24
92.5
30 1 , 0
2.70
19,0
MODAL
HFET
1 ,83
46.9
174.8
2.84
34,9
076
71 AMMO STAW 304
COLD
TRANS
6,59
97.3
499. 1
4,46
13.2
COLD
STAB
4,28
120.0
504.3
2.08
12.6
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,17
95,1
453.2
4.01
14.3
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,26
117,2
500.2
2.29
12.7
ICOL
8,2 X CO
ICOG
5,8 X CO
1972
FTP
5,41
108,9
501 .8
3,24
12.9
1975
FTP
5,29
108,3
489, 1
3,11
13,1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.19
106,5
477,3
3.13
13,4
NONE
HFtT
2.96
63. 1
359,9
«.13
18,9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARSON:HYDROGEN RATIO
143
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -..-GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
077
71 RIJIC SKYL 350
COLD
trans
11.39
177,4
589,2
1,79
9,8
COLD
STAB
3.86
72.3
641 .9
2.20
11,6
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
<4.61
92.1
554.2
2.37
12,4
IHCG
420PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
3.90
77.2
618.5
2.19
1 1.8
ICOL
5.6 % CO
I COG
5.3 X CO
1972
FTP
7.52
123.4
616.2
2.00
10,6
1975
FTP
5,6a
99,8
606,5
2,16
11.4
OTHER
TESTSJ
HOT
START
4.25
84.U
587.2
2.28
12.1
NONE
HFET
2.15
48.0
470.5
2.66
16.1
078
71 F3UIC ELEC 455
COLD
trans
6,45
131.3
752.9
5.04
9.1
COLD
STAB
5,24
93,4
757,9
3.11
9,6
IHCL
6168PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.95
99.8
642.2
4.95
10.9
IHCG
190PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.93
93.5
714.6
2.79
10.1
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.83
111.8
755.5
4.05
9.3
1975
FTP
5,41
103.1
724,8
4.03
9,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.94
96.6
679.a
3,84
10.5
NONE
HFET
3.67
75.5
495.9
4 ,94
14.2
079
71 CADT DEVI 472
COLD
TRANS
4,17
126.4
848,6
3.48
8,4
COLD
STAB
2,59
66,5
873. 1
3.10
9,0
IHCL
1353PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,20
108.4
736,3
3.62
9,7
IHCG
90PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,85
94.9
839.3
2.08
8.9
ICOL
2.1 * CO
ICOG
2.0 * CO
1972
FTP
3.36
95.6
861 . 1
3.29
8.7
1975
FTP
3,09
90.6
830,0
3.33
9,0
OTHER
TESTS J
HOT
START
3.02
101.5
789.2
2.83
9,3
NONE
HFET
1.92
69.7
629. 3
3,39
11.9
080
71 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
4.78
93.8
395.0
4.43
15.9
COLD
STAB
3,20
96.2
358,7
1.70
17.1
IHCL
9700PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.95
69. 1
346,6
4.01
19.1
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.12
99.2
314,8
1.57
18.5
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
5.0 % CO
1972
FTP
3,97
95.0
376.4
3.02
16.5
1975
FTP
3,46
88.2
363,0
2.91
17.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.03
84.5
330.3
2.76
18.8
NONE
HFET
2,16
65. 1
309.2
3.52
21.2
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 111.
85 C ARBON;H YDROGEN
RATIO
14-1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .---.GRAMS PER MILE- FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
081
71 CHEV MALI 307
COLD
TRANS
1 0.59
132.4
466,8
2,29
12.5
COLD
STAB
6.53
56.6
507.4
3.01
14.4
IHCL
6069PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.72
96.6
414.1
2.2R
15.1
IHCG
540PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.04
75.3
476.5
2.50
14.4
I COL
3.6 * CO
ICOG
3.H 5! CO
1972
FTP
6.51
93.5
487.7
2.66
13.4
1975
FTP
7.43
83.5
473. 1
2.66
14.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6,89
85.7
446.2
2.39
1«.7
NONE
HFET
4.68
67.9
335.9
2.57
19,4
082
71 CHEV NOVA 350
COLD
TRANS
7,86
129.5
530,9
2.48
11.7
COLD
STAB
6,01
90.8
582,9
2.17
11.9
IHCL
7661 PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.49
99.J
473,9
2,56
13.7
IHCG
530PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.63
1 14.2
553.4
1,87
11.8
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
7.8 x en
1972
FTP
6.91
109.7
557.6
2,32
1 1,8
1975
FTP
6.25
101.3
541,8
2.35
12,3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6.07
106.9
514,7
2.21
12,6
NONE
HFET
«.35
79.3
356.8
2.23
17,9
083
71 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
6.49
133.5
508.3
2.16
12.0
COLD
STAB
5.91
121.0
430,6
1.39
13.9
IHCL
5553PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.97
113.8
376.3
1.05
15.5
IHCG
550PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.82
145.8
396,2
1,10
13,7
ICOL
5,1 X CO
ICOG
6,5 X CO
1972
FTP
6.19
127. 1
468.4
1.77
12,9
1975
FTP
6.05
121.6
431.8
1.68
13,8
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6,40
1 30,2
386,5
1 .46
14,5
NONE
HFET
4,09
95,0
327 .9
1.70
18,1
084
71 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
8,39
180.4
516,4
1 .67
10,7
COLD
STAB
4,43
69.4
598,0
2.57
12.3
IHCL
3979PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.01
77.1
481 .7
2.75
14,4
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.00
71.0
543.1
2.17
13,3
ICOL
3.8 X CO
ICOG
3.5 X CO
1972
FTP
6,36
123,4
558,3
2,13
U.5
1975
FTP
5.14
94,7
548,6
2.43
12,4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4,01
74.0
513.2
2.45
13,8
NONE
HFET
2.96
74.8
358.1
2.14
18,3
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1 ! 1 .
85 CARBONiHYDROGEN
RATIO
145
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
i
1 o
1 X
¦
(
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
CO 2
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
005
71 CHEV IMPA 400
COLD
TRANS
8,93
181.1
626,0
2,67
9.5
COLD
STAB
5.31
99,6
665,7
2.77
10,6
IHCL
4676PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5,49
112,1
550.9
3,08
11.9
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.65
113,9
618,8
2,39
10,9
ICOL
4.8 X CO
ICOG
a,6 X CO
1972
FTP
7,07
139,3
646,4
2.72
10,0
197S
FTP
6.12
120,1
625,5
2.83
10,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.57
113,0
585,7
2.72
11.4
NONE
HFET
3.91
86,2
428.7
2.98
15,a
086
71 CHRY 300 440
COLD
TRANS
10.00
190.3
660.8
2.06
9.0
COLD
STAR
4.64
117.3
688.0
1.92
10.0
IHCL
6367PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.30
112.9
564.2
2. 16
11.8
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
5.15
137.8
658, 1
1.71
10.0
ICOL
5.6 X CO
T COG
4.2 X CO
1972
FTP
7.25
152.8
674.8
1 .99
9.5
1975
FTP
5.67
131.3
648,0
2.0?
10.2
OTHER
TESTS I
HOT
START
4.74
125.7
612.4
1.93
10.8
NONE
HFET
3.92
1 04.5
454.5
2.21
14.1
087
71 DATS 3EDA 71
COLD
TRANS
3.55
57.8
273.9
3,25
23.6
COLD
STAB
4.15
43.0
275,3
2.99
24.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.22
^7.5
232.4
3,28
27.7
IHCG
1600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.10
45.1
246.9
2.57
26.8
ICOL
0.6 X CO
ICOG
2.3 X CO
1972
FTP
3,86
50.2
274,6
3.12
24.3
1975
FTP
4,04
«7.3
263, 1
3.13
25,3
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
4.16
46.3
239,8
2.91
27,2
NONE
HFET
1 .49
32.5
184,2
2.87
37,0
088
71 DODG VAN 318
COLD
TRANS
1 1.44
148. 1
511.4
2.09
11.4
COLD
STAB
9.22
128,7
513.9
1.54
11.9
IHCL
8357PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.23
112.4
503.7
2.80
12.6
IHCG
500PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
9.58
143.2
525.9
1 .44
11.4
ICOL
4.4 X CO
ICOG
3,4 X CO
1972
FTP
10.30
138.2
512.7
1.81
1 1.6
1975
FTP
9.13
128.3
510.6
2.00
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8.44
128.2
515.1
2.10
1'1.9
NONE
HFET
4.62
60.6
432.9
3.67
16.4
fuel
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBHN:HYDROGEN
R A TI f J
1 i[b
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCFDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PER MILE-- — - FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
CU2
NOXC
ECON
089
71 FORD PINT 122
COLD
TRANS
6,51
74,0
280.8
2,54
21.2
COLD
STA0
6,90
79,6
299,9
2.15
19.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.17
61,7
267,3
2,84
23,3
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,49
80,6
301,9
2.15
19,8
ICOL
5,6 * CO
ICOG
6,3 % CO
1972
FTP
6,71
76,9
290,6
2.3a
20,5
1975
FTP
6.34
73.4
286.9
2.42
21.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,85
71. 4
285,1
2.as
21.3
NONE
HFET
1 ,9a
O
•
o
226.2
3.16
31.8
090
71 FlIRD HAVE 200
COLO
TRANS
3.74
64,0
394.6
5,54
17,5
COLD
STAB
3.17
71,9
378.1
4.11
17,7
I HC L
3681PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.90
«2.3
371.9
6,41
19,8
I HCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
3.02
57.3
394,9
5,08
17,9
ICOL
4.9 X CO
ICOG
3,2 X CO
1972
FTP
3.45
66.1
386,1
4,81
17,6
1975
FTP
3.21
62,0
379,8
5,05
18,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.96
50,0
383,7
5,73
18,8
NONE
HFET
1 .65
lfl.5
312,4
7,21
26, 1
091
71 FORD STAW 302
COLD
TRANS
10.14
164,3
543,3
3,62
10,6
COLD
STAB
7,18
139,1
545,6
4,27
11.3
IHCL
8158PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9,90
133,0
499,2
4.46
12.0
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,97
133,9
543, 1
4.20
11.4
ICOL
5,6 X CO
ICOG
5,8 X en
1972
FTP
8,62
151,4
544,5
3,95
11.0
1975
FTP
8,55
142.7
532,3
4,18
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8,40
133,5
521,7
4.33
11.7
NONE
HFET
4,30
55,7
444,2
6,39
16.3
092
71 FORD MUST 351
COLD
TRANS
6,97
97,0
518,9
3,60
12.8
COLD
STAB
8,22
78,2
506, 0
2.39
15.6
IHCL
7959PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.33
82,8
562,1
a,24
12.4
IHCG
600PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
10.02
81,2
577.5
2.59
12,0
ICOL
2,1 * CO
ICOG
1.1 X CO
1972
FTP
7,61
87,3
512,3
2.98
13.2
1975
FTP
7,71
83,4
524,3
3.16
13.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8,71
82,0
570,0
3.39
12,2
NONE
HFET
3,67
61,1
397.6
3.75
17.6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
1^/
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.-..-grams per mile
HC CO C02
noxc
MPG
FUEL
ECON
093
71 FORD THUN 429
COLD
TRANS
8.55
117.4
668.5
3,63
10.1
COLD
STAB
4.21
94.8
763.5
3.44
9.6
IHCL
7949PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.15
91.4
619.6
4.78
11.4
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
<1.32
97.6
731.4
3.51
9.9
ICOL
5.6 * CO
I COG
3.0 X CO
1972
FTP
6.32
105.8
717.2
3.53
9.8
1975
FTP
5.38
98.6
703.7
3.85
10.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
a.72
94.6
677,0
4.13
10.6
NONE
HFET
3.13
55.3
479.9
4,78
15.4
094
71 MERC MONT 400
COLD
TRANS
5.58
117.7
658,6
7.76
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.91
93.8
650,8
6,47
11.0
IHCL
4298PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
3.89
59.0
671,6
9.92
11.4
IHCG
340PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.01
86.3
657,2
5.65
11.0
ICOL
5.0 * CO
ICOG
5.5 * CO
1972
FTP
a.72
105.4
654.6
7.10
10.6
1975
FTP
4.25
89. 1
658.2
7,70
10,9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.95
73.0
664.2
7.73
11.2
NONE
HFET
2.23
36.9
478.5
8.46
16.3
095
71 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
6,40
119.4
540. 1
4.83
U.9
COLD
STAB
4.62
102.6
540.7
3,87
12.4
IHCL
U527PP* CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.12
98.5
469.4
4,43
13.9
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.50
109.0
522.2
3,13
12.5
ICOL
5.fa * CO
ICOG
4,8 X CO
1972
FTP
5,49
110.8
540.4
4,34
12.1
1975
FTP
5.13
105.0
520.8
4,23
12.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.80
103.9
496.5
3,76
13.1
NONE
HFET
3.21
60,9
398.4
4,98
17.6
096
71 OLDS DELT 455
COLD
TRANS
5.78
164.9
720.9
2.05
0.9
COLD
STAB
3.50
89.2
816.2
2.30
9.2
IHCL
2785PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.53
116.6
652,0
2.14
10,4
IHCG
lflOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.49
83.7
818,1
2.33
9.2
ICOL
6.6 X CO
ICOG
3.« X CO
1972
FTP
4.61
126.0
769,8
2.18
9.0
1975
FTP
4.26
112.6
750,7
2.20
9.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.99
99,8
737,2
2.24
9.8
NONE
HFET
2.29
62.0
491 ,2
2.33
14.9
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A til,
85 CARBONJHYDROGEN
RATIO
148
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -.---GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
097
71 PLYM SCAM 225
COLD
TRANS
13.73
128.7
353,3
4,19
14,8
COLD
STAB
3.80
60.1
336, 4
4,27
20,0
IHCL
4047PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.42
53.5
340,2
5,17
20,4
IHCG
430PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
3.76
59,0
328,9
4,18
20,5
ICOL
5.0 X CO
I COG
5.5 X CO
1972
FTP
e.6a
93.5
344,6
4,23
17,1
1975
FTP
5.78
72.6
341.0
4 ,50
18.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.59
56.3
334,4
4,66
20.4
NONE
HFET
2.28
35.2
306,9
5,56
24,0
098
71 PLYM SATE 318
COLD
TRANS
6,57
112.6
527.4
3.69
12.2
COLD
STAB
4,22
102,5
495.3
2.23
13.3
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.87
87.0
447.3
4.18
14.8
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
5,34
135.6
454.4
1.42
13,0
ICOL
6,6 X CO
ICOG
3,2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.36
107.4
510,9
2.94
12,7
1975
FTP
4.89
100.3
488.7
3.08
13.4
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
5.11
111.9
450 .9
2.76
li.8
NONE
HFET
2.84
71.6
364.6
3.07
18,3
099
71 PONT FIRE 350
COLD
TRANS
8.69
136.4
619.3
3.49
10.3
COLD
STAB
5.65
84.8
654.4
2.37
11.0
IHCL
0447PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,67
120.4
524.5
2.87
12.1
IHCG
2 1 0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.15
154,2
575.3
GO
O
•
10.6
ICOL
4.3 * CO
ICOG
4.0 X CO
1972
FTP
7.13
109.9
637,4
2.92
10.7
1975
FTP
6.57
105.5
611.1
2.75
11.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
6,92
137.8
550,6
1.95
11.2
NONE
HFET
4.69
111.9
384.6
2.33
15.4
100
71 PONT CATA 400
CULD
TRANS
7.31
147.4
624,5
3.56
10.1
COLD
STAB
4.56
91.2
692.5
2.77
10.4
IHCL
4357PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.01
105.5
564.5
4.15
1 1.9
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.33
124.8
653.8
2.14
10.2
ICOL
4.4 * cn
ICOG
3.4 * cn
1972
FTP
5.90
118.5
659.4
3.15
10.3
1975
FTP
5.26
106.9
642,8
3.32
10.7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5.18
115.4
610.3
3.12
1 1.0
NONE
HFET
3.63
80.5
429.0
4,06
15.7
FUFl
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 C ARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
149
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE-
C02
m mm • •
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
101
71 TOYO CORO 97
COLD
TRANS
4,52
58.5
283,8
3.94
22,8
COLD
STAB
3,98
73.0
300.0
2.13
20.8
IHCL
3780PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.12
49.6
258,9
3.51
25.5
IHCG
1U0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.99
71.3
288.1
1.95
21.5
ICOL
3.8 X CO
ICOG
?,0 X CO
1972
FTP
4.24
66.0
292.1
3.01
21.7
1975
FTP
3.94
63.5
285.2
2.89
22.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.71
60.8
273.9
2.71
23.3
NONE
HFET
1.77
24.8
216.0
4.12
34.1
102
71 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
5.48
76.7
290.3
2.30
20,7
COLD
stab
4.71
90.6
326.9
1.54
18.3
IHCL
2535PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.90
71.9
272.6
2.03
22.3
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.50
88.3
336.7
1.63
18.1
ICOL
1.9 X CO
ICOG
1.7 X CO
1972
FTP
5.09
83,8
309. 1
1.91
19.4
1975
FTP
4.65
82.5
304,2
1.83
19.8
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4.20
80.3
305.5
1 .82
19.9
NONE
HFFT
1.57
41.9
205. 1
2.03
32.2
103 70 BUIC 3TAW U55 COLD TRANS
COLD STAB
IHCL 9452PPM CARBON HOT TRANS
IHCG 700PPM HEXANE HOT STAB
ICOL 6.6 * CO
ICOG 7.B * CO 1972 FTP
1975 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HOT START
NONE HFET
9.82
139.6
647 . 8
7.59
9.9
8,09
110.9
635.3
8.68
10.6
6.23
H3.7
577.5
9.30
12.2
7.82
104.5
627.4
8.33
10.9
8.93
124.9
6«1 .4
8.15
10.2
7.94
1 09.a
621 ,9
8.63
10.8
7 .04
9a.a
603, 1
8.80
11.5
3.32
23.3
498.2
10.49
16.3
104
70 CHEV STAW 250
COLD
TRANS
14.64
152.3
400.5
1.77
12.9
COLD
STAB
6.26
152.8
422.6
0.81
13.0
IHCL
3432PPM CARBON
HOT
trams
8.9 2
153.8
375.6
1 .60
13.7
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.54
134.5
430, 1
0.91
13,5
ICOL
3.3 X CO
ICOG
2.4 X CO
1972
FTP
10.34
152,5
411,9
1 ,28
13,0
1975
FTP
8.75
153.0
404.9
1,24
13,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
S T A W T
7.19
143.9
403.5
1 .26
13,6
NONE
HFET
5.32
72.3
360.2
3.31
18,1
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 CARBONJHYDROGEN
RATIO
15 0
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
DN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1
1
X •
o «
•
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
105
70 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
TRANS
15,57
138,6
452,6
3,36
12.3
COLD
STAB
9.88
99,a
479,3
3.23
13,3
IHCL
7511 PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
10,28
108.1
393.6
2,99
14,9
IHCG
6U0PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
8,31
98,0
446,9
2.76
14,1
I COL
5.2 X CO
I COG
5.0 X CO
1972
FTP
12.65
1 18.6
466.3
3.29
12,8
1975
FTP
11.18
110.0
450.0
3.19
13.5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
9.27
102.9
421.0
2.87
14,5
NONE"
HFET
5.00
66.5
310,7
3.01
20.6
106
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
8,06
146. 1
530,6
4.03
11.3
COLD
STAB
5.96
101.7
536,5
4.08
12.4
IHCL
9850PPM CARRON
HOT
TRANS
5.53
97.0
481.3
4.72
13.6
IHCG
700PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.93
94.9
522.7
3.81
12.9
ICflL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
8,4 X CO
1972
FTP
6.98
123.3
533.6
4.05
1 1.8
1975
FTP
6.28
109.7
519.9
4.25
12.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.74
95.9
502,6
4.25
13.2
NONE
HFET
3,69
61,2
399,6
5.30
17,5
107
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
trans
12.06
143,1
501.2
2.35
11.6
COLD
STAB
4,50
76,9
563.1
3.37
12.7
IHCL
4079PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,33
70,3
504.9
3.73
14.0
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,00
208.6
568.9
3.48
9.7
I COL
4,0 X CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
8,18
109.1
533.0
2.87
12.2
1975
FTP
6,32
88.9
534,0
3,26
12.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,16
141.3
537.8
3.60
11.4
NONE
HFET
4.01
75.2
414.9
3.80
16.3
108
70 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
18.52
247.7
376.3
O.fll
10.8
COLD
STAB
5,72
115.7
429 .6
1 .43
14.1
IHCL
4407PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,24
115.2
376,7
1.41
15.5
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,95
98.8
425,6
1.47
14.9
ICOL
3.4 X CO
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
11 ,95
179.9
403.6
1.13
12.3
1975
FTP
8,27
143.2
403.8
1.30
13.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,09
1 06,8
401.8
1 .44
15,2
NONE
HFET
3,58
90.1
325.8
I .36
18,5
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
85 CARBON:HYDROGtN
RATIO
151
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DENVER
VfcH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
109
70 chev impa aoo
COLD
TRANS
R.37
153.9
561.5
3.40
10.7
COLD
STAB
6.23
106.3
558.2
3.24
11.9
IHCL
7263PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.08
83,0
511,2
4.26
13,5
IHCG
460PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.21
116,6
536,9
2.99
12,0
ICOL
5.6 X CO
I COG
7.8 * CO
197?
FTP
7.27
129.5
559,8
3.32
11.3
1975
FTP
6.36
109,8
5*15.8
3.56
12.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5.66
100,3
52a. 4
3.61
12.7
NONE
HFFT
3.44
58.4
407.0
3,80
17.4
110
70 DODG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
11.14
188,3
592,7
2.47
9,6
COLD
stab
6,37
114,3
600.4
2.33
11,1
IHCL
4974PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7,38
138,5
530.8
2.64
11.5
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.58
143,0
571 .4
1 .90
10,8
ICOL
3,5 X CO
ICOG
5,0 X CO
1972
FTP
8.69
150.3
596.7
2,40
10,3
1975
FTP
7,65
136,5
579.5
2.44
10,8
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
7,48
140.8
551,7
2,26
11,1
NONE
HFET
5,68
119.0
437,4
2,78
13,8
111
70 FORD MAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
6,54
115,3
405,0
2,14
14,6
COLD
STAB
4,79
98,8
366.2
1,25
16,5
IHCL
6517PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,98
89,6
330,8
1,80
18.2
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,70
120,3
340,2
0,83
16.2
ICOL
6.3 X CO
ICOG
5,5 * CO
1972
FTP
5.64
1 06,8
385, 1
1.68
15.5
1975
FTP
5.20
99.7
364.5
1.59
16.5
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
5.35
105.4
335,6
1.30
17.1
NONE
HFET
3,30
62,6
264.0
1,^7
23,8
112
70 FORD MUST 302
COLD
TRANS
5.71
79,0
529. 1
4.21
13.2
COLD
STAR
3.75
51,7
546,7
1 ,84
13.9
IHCL
1924PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,05
50,2
449,4
3,74
16.3
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,64
55,6
526,4
1 .60
14.2
ICOL
0.4 X CO
ICOG
0,5 * CO
1972
FTP
4,70
65,0
538. 1
3,00
13,5
1975
FTP
4.52
57,0
516.0
2.86
14.3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4.33
52,9
488.9
2.64
15.1
NONE
HFET
3.35
39.1
339.1
3.86
21.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1 :1 .
85 CARHONSHYDROGEN
RATIO
L<32
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH ..---GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
113
70 FORD TORI 351
COLO
TRANS
5,42
71.0
541 .7
5.00
13.2
COLD
STAB
4.46
63.7
528.8
3.49
13.ft
IHCL
4079PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.36
69.1
470.0
4.39
14.9
IHCG
335PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.60
75.3
506.6
2.97
13.9
ICOL
4.3 * CO
I COG
5.a X CD
1972
FTP
4.93
67.3
535. 1
4.22
13.5
1975
FTP
a.91
66.7
515.2
4.05
14.0
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
a.97
72.3
488.7
3.66
14.4
NONE
HFET
3,05
43.2
389.9
5.00
19.0
114
70 FORD CUST 351
COLD
TRANS
15.69
187.4
433,9
1 .86
u.«
COLD
star
9.13
106.9
502.4
3.23
12.7
IHCL
5372PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.68
82.6
453.9
4,34
14.5
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.79
108.5
507,2
3.37
12.6
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
6.2 X CO
1972
FTP
12.33
146. 1
469,0
2,56
12.0
1975
FTP
10.44
117.0
474.6
3.25
12.8
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
8.32
95.9
481.3
3.84
13.5
NONE
HFET
3.84
59.8
444,3
4,56
16.1
115
70 FORO LTD 390
COLD
TRANS
o
•
CO
150,0
558.7
2,40
10.8
COLD
STAB
3,83
44,4
644.3
2.64
12.2
IHCL
2044PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.01
59,4
538.3
3.38
13.8
IHCG
250PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
3,72
49.0
617,8
2.25
12.6
ICOL
0,3 % CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5,88
95.8
602,6
2.52
11.5
1975
FTP
4,76
70,7
597,0
2.80
12.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,86
54.1
579, 1
2,80
13.1
NONE
HFET
2.94
64.2
382,7
2.32
16.0
116
70 HERC MARQ 429
COLD
TRANS
10,44
168.2
640,6
3.86
9.5
COLD
STAB
5.88
81.5
670.8
4.05
10,9
IHCL
5671 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.88
89.0
577,3
5.1 0
12.1
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.70
100.4
655,6
3,63
10.7
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
8,10
123.7
656. 1
3.96
10.1
1975
FTP
6.B3
101.7
638,5
4.30
10,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.79
94,8
617,5
4.35
11.3
NONE
HFET
4.76
77.7
472.0
4.75
14.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l: l
,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
153
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVFR
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CU
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECI1N
117
70 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
9,76
175,4
481,6
1.77
11.3
COLD
STAB
83.2
575,8
2.68
12.3
IHCL
2885PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.62
116,6
470, 1
2.33
13.2
I HCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a,ua
83,1
555,2
2.37
12.7
ICOL
2,2 * CO
I COG
1.5 * CO
1972
FTP
7.IS
128. 1
530,0
2.24
1 1,8
1975
FTP
6,00
111,8
526,8
2.39
12,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,01
99,a
513,8
2.35
12,9
NONE
HFET
3,35
61.1
380.7
3.34
18,2
1 18
70 OLDS TORO 455
COLD
trans
3,88
62,4
710.0
6.18
10,8
COLD
STAB
3.«2
67. 1
749,2
3.24
10,3
IHCL
1890PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,91
55.1
630, 1
5.32
12,2
I HCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
3,40
73,4
774,7
3.47
9.9
ICOL
1,8 X CO
ICOG
1.9 * CO
1972
F TP
3.64
64,8
730,1
4,67
10.5
1975
FTP
3.65
62,8
708.0
4.43
10.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.65
64.5
704.3
«.37
10.9
none
HFET
2,63
53.2
534.3
6.22
14,2
1 19
70 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
9.32
IPO,2
592.9
2.58
9.6
COLD
STAB
7.94
158,3
523.5
2.36
11.1
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.02
173,0
503.6
2.53
U.l
I HCG
540PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.41
181.0
489.2
1 .66
11.1
I COL
5,6 X CO
ICOG
6,2 X CD
1972
FTP
8.61
173.8
557.3
2.47
10.3
1975
FTP
8,25
169,0
532,5
2.45
10,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8,22
177,1
496,2
2,08
11.1
NONE
HFET
5,71
160.2
453.6
2.12
12.3
120
70 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
6.61
151.9
611,0
2.33
10.2
COLD
stab
5,00
116.0
532,1
1.44
12.2
IHCL
3558PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,47
147.4
407.a
1.64
13.5
I HCG
170PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,45
147.1
493.9
1 .25
12.0
ICOL
3.6 * CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5,78
133,5
570,5
1,87
11.1
1975
FTP
5,47
132,2
514.0
1,68
12,0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5,46
147,2
451.8
1 .44
12,7
NONF
HFFT
3,99
119,8
343. 1
1.52
16,3
FUFL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
15<+
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE WOOL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
121
70 PONT LEMA 350
COLD
TRANS
1 1.46
106.8
514,3
2.12
10,5
.COLD
STAB
7,66
111.8
548,8
3,06
11,8
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7,08
124,6
477 .5
3,18
12,8
IHCG
360PPM HEXANE
HOT
stah
7.51
123,6
499,6
2,56
12,4
I COL
5.6 X Cn
ICOG
3.a * CO
1972
FTP
9.51
149,8
532,0
2,60
11.1
1975
FTP
8.29
132,6
521 .a
2.90
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.30
124, 1
488,9
2.86
12,6
NONE
HFET
4,35
58,7
420.6
4.74
16,9
122
70 PONT STAW 400
COLD
TRANS
8,02
119,0
716,8
4,71
9.6
COLD
STAB
5.09
113,1
734,9
3,51
9.6
IHCL
2676PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.10
76,8
624.4
5,60
11.7
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,63
91,0
704.5
3,86
10,3
ICOL
3,6 X CO
ICOG
3,4 X CO
1972
FTP
6,SI
llb.O
726.1
4,09
9,6
1975
FTP
5,43
104,3
700.5
4.34
10,1
OTHER
TESTSJ
HOT
START
4,37
84,1
665,5
4.71
10,9
NONE
HFET
2,40
19.6
493,0
7,38
16,7
123
70 TOYO CORH 116
COLD
TRANS
3,76
51.2
325,1
5.43
21.3
COLD
STAB
2.97
58,4
284,5
2.75
23.0
IHCL
846PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,17
63.2
264,4
3,00
23.2
IHCG
170PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
3.14
64.6
306,8
2.43
21.2
ICOL
0,1 X CO
ICOG
0,1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.35
54,9
304,3
4.05
22.1
1975
FTP
4,02
58,2
287,4
3,38
22,7
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
4,62
63,9
286,2
2.71
22.1
NONE
HFET
1.19
32,2
243,2
4.36
29,8
124
70 VOLK SFDA 97
COLD
TRANS
5,14
74.1
267.4
2.92
22.2
COLD
STAB
3,82
72,0
314.0
2.47
20.2
IHCL
2474PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,03
62,6
260.0
2.68
24.1
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,46
67,8
304.9
2.56
21.0
ICOL
3,1 X C(1
ICOG
3,1 X CO
1972
FTP
4,46
73,0
291 .3
2.69
21.1
1975
ftp
3,87
69.8
289,3
2,6?
21.6
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
start
3,25
65.3
283,1
2,62
22.4
NONE
HFET
1.43
38.5
219,1
3.46
31.2
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
R5 CARBON:HYDROGFN
RATIO
lbo
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .--.-GRAMS PER MILE---- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
125
69 AMMO STAW 290
COLD
TRANS
8,75
175,5
363.5
1.52
13.3
COLD
STAB
7,88
161,5
363.6
1.10
13.8
IHCL
9551PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.75
147,9
355,9
1.90
14.5
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.12
157,9
372,2
1.19
13.7
ICOL
5.6 * CO
I COG
7,8 X CO
1972
FTP
8.30
168,3
363,5
1.31
13,6
1975
FTP
8,03
160.7
361 ,4
1.41
13.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7,9a
153.0
364.2
1.54
14.1
NONE
HFET
a, 76
7a.1
333,0
3.34
1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
Nf),
YR MAKF MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
«
I 1
O I
1
GRAMS 1
CO
PFR MILF
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECHN
129
69 CHEV STAW 327
COLD
TRANS
17.27
205.6
507.7
3.11
10.0
COLD
STAB
e.9fl
133.3
523.2
2.40
11.7
IHCL
994PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
11,17
161.7
434.9
2.31
12.3
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.52
137.0
518.6
2.40
11.6
ICOL
0.3 X CO
ICflG
0.4 * CO
1972
FTP
13.02
168.5
515.7
2.75
10.8
1975
FTP
11.33
156.3
495.5
2.53
11.4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
10.33
149.0
4 77 .9
2.36
11.9
NONE
HFET
7.43
139.6
353.5
2.38
14.9
130
69 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
8,94
164.3
516,5
3.29
11.1
COLD
STAB
5.42
102.8
519.2
2.59
12.7
IHCL
4079PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.77
79.7
466,7
3.89
14.6
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.26
99,8
510.6
2.39
13,0
ICOL
3.3 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X en
1972
FTP
7.13
1 32.7
517.9
2.93
11,8
1975
FTP
5.98
1 09,2
504 , 1
3.10
12,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.03
90,0
489,3
3,12
13.7
NONE
HFET
3.41
57.8
357, 1
3.52
19.4
131
69 CHEV CAMA 350
COLD
TRANS
9.03
168. 1
511.8
2.85
11.0
COLD
STAB
8.17
1 48.0
484,5
1.47
1 1.9
IHCL
9939PPH CARBON'
HOT
TRANS
7.76
121.8
431.4
2.60
13.7
IHCG
800PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.25
167.3
454,5
1.19
11.9
ICOL
6,6 * CO
ICOG
7.2 X CO
1972
FTP
8.59
157.8
497.7
2.14
11.5
1975
FTP
8.23
144.9
475.5
2.07
12.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
8.53
1 45.2
443.3
1.87
12.7
NONE
HFET
4.20
76.0
364. 1
2.83
17.9
132
69 CHEV STAW 427
COLD
TRAMS
11.69
196. 1
607.0
3.62
9.3
COLD
STAR
8,88
118.6
629.9
2.82
10.5
IHCL
6467PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.03
113.6
534 .8
4.06
12.1
IHCG
350PPH HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,66
129.3
596.3
2.48
10,8
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICflG
5,0 X CO
1972
FTP
10,25
156.3
618.7
3.21
9,9
1975
FTP
8,96
133.4
598.7
3.33
10.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6,84
121.6
566,3
3.25
11.4
NONE
HFET
4.48
81 .8
424.8
3.54
15.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 111
.85 CARBONiHYDRUGEN
RATIO
15/
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH ....-GRAMS PER MILE-- — - FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
133
69 CHRY NEWP 383
COLD
TRANS
7,76
73.8
621 .6
6. la
11.6
COLD
STAB
5.91
99.2
584,9
5.3a
11.7
I HC L
5890PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.29
63.3
54U.2
6.55
13.a
I HC G
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6. 36
109.6
568.1
5.10
11.7
ICOL
5.6 X C(1
I COG
6.0 * CO
1972
FTP
6.81
86.9
602.8
5.73
11.7
1975
ftp
6.13
ea.0
581.3
5.8a
12.1
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
5.8U
87.1
556.5
5.81
12.5
NONE
HFET
3.37
36.2
<469.7
7.22
16.5
l3u
69 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRANS
8.93
16
5.93
18.2
none
HFET
2. aa
13.fl
3aa.2
7.15
23,8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 carhon:hydrogen
RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH -.--.GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
137
69 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
7.36
69, 1
517,9
6.42
13.1
COLD
STAB
7.21
75.8
513.2
5.16
13.5
IHCL
4974PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.67
63.a
467,6
6.05
15,1
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.61
9a .2
500.0
a.52
13,3
ICOL
3.8 * CO
ICOG
3.0 * CO
1972
FTP
7.28
72.5
530,1
5.77
13.3
1975
FTP
7,09
70.9
507.8
5.67
13.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.74
79.2
484 .3
5.26
1«. 1
NONE
HFET
3.46
37.5
380.9
5.09
1^.7
I 38
69 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
9.47
88.6
5«6.1
5.52
12.4
COLD
STAB
6.18
63.9
551 .9
5.24
13.2
IHCL
8904PPM CARBflN
HOT
TRANS
8.19
58.2
482.7
6.06
14.8
IHCG
360PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.91
66.6
526, 1
4.54
13.7
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
3,0 * CO
1972
FTP
7,78
75.9
549.1
5.38
12.8
1975
FTP
7.42
67.5
531.5
5.53
13.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.02
62.5
505.0
5.28
14.2
NONE
HFET
3.52
29.2
397 .2
6.24
19.5
139
69 FORD GALA 390
COLD
TRANS
8.00
98.2
615.2
6.83
11.2
COLD
STAR
5.46
76.7
585.8
6.25
12.3
IHCL
4278PPM CARRON
HOT
TRANS
5.59
56.8
557 .9
7.53
13.4
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.22
77.9
582.3
5.75
12.3
ICOL
4.8 * CO
ICOG
3.0 * CO
1972
FTP
6.70
87.2
600.2
6.53
11.7
1975
FTP
6.03
75.7
584.2
6.73
12.3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5.40
67.6
570 .4
6.62
12.8
NONE
HFET
3.64
31.7
489.7
8.17
16.1
140
69 MERC MONT 390
COLD
TRANS
9.33
102,9
536,4
6.46
12.2
COLD
STAB
7.39
136,9
563,5
5.35
11.1
IHCL
6069PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.44
102,2
531,6
6,87
12.5
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,79
132,6
558,2
5.14
11.3
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
4.2 * CO
1972
FTP
8,33
120,4
550,3
5.89
1 1.6
1975
FTP
7.53
120,2
549,0
6.01
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6,62
117,8
545,3
5.98
1 1.8
NONE
HFET
3.86
53.3
435.2
7,20
16.7
FIJEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1. 85 C A RBUN : H YDROGF N RATIO
159
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
--••••I
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
Ill
69 OLDS 90 «55
COLD
TRANS
7.32
192.2
631. 1
2.26
9,3
COLD
STAB
5.73
112.3
601 .2
2.80
11.2
IHCL
616BPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.75
120.9
5 '4 9. 1
3.23
11.7
IHCG
3«0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.46
101.0
621.1
3.00
11.1
ICflL
5.5 X CO
ICOG
5.5 x cn
1972
FTP
6.50
151.2
615.7
2.5a
10.2
1975
FTP
6,07
131 .a
593.0
2.81
10.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.60
110.7
586. 1
3.11
1 l.«
NONE
HFET
3.36
60.2
459.2
3.95
15.7
1«2
69 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
2.36
2a.5
a85.2
a.37
16,7
COLD
STAB
3.«a
33.1
555.8
3.9a
ia.3
IHCL
1890PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.<42
a8.2
515,a
5.25
1 a, 7
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
3.77
a5.3
585.8
a.as
13,3
ICOL
O.a * CO
ICOG
0.3 X CO
1972
FTP
2.92
28.9
521 .a
a. 15
15.a
1975
FTP
3.P1
3S.5
529.8
a.ao
ia.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.60
a6.7
551 .5
a.86
13.9
NONE
HFET
2.91
aa.o
393.2
5.05
18.6
1 a 3
69 PONT FIRE 350
COLD
TRANS
18.2a
215.0
623.9
2.39
8.7
COLD
STAB
11 .20
160.9
563.6
1.72
10.a
IHCL
8755PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.08
155.0
a32.9
1 .80
12,6
IHCG
385PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
11 .22
165.a
5ao. 1
1.57
10.6
ICOL
5.a X en
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
FTP
l a. 63
187.2
593.0
2.05
9.5
1975
FTP
12.09
170.6
5ao.o
1 .88
10.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
10.18
160.a
U87 .9
1 .68
11.5
NONE
HFET
a.as
92.3
357.3
2.16
17.2
laa
69 PONT GTO aOO
COLD
TRANS
8.71
90,9
617.3
a,09
11.3
COLD
STAB
7.19
113,1
596.5
2.85
11.1
IHCL
3979PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.53
73,6
587,8
5.05
12.3
IHCG
200PPM HEXANt
HOT
STAB
5.96
70.5
612.a
3.7a
12.0
ICOL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
1 .a x en
1972
FTP
7.93
102.3
606.6
3.«5
11.2
1975
FTP
7.33
97.5
598.5
3.72
11.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.2a
72.0
600.a
a.38
12.1
NONE
HFtT
3.72
20.a
496. 0
6.90
16.a
FULL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
lbO
-------
APPENDIX C,CON T•D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE HODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i <_>
1 I
i
i
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
m m m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUFL
ECON
1«5
69 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
8,76
97. 4
253,7
1.83
20,4
COLD
STAB
6.85
86,7
289.1
1.78
19.9
IHCL
5372PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.03
72.7
252,4
1.95
23.2
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
7,88
93.5
2B5.8
1.52
19.4
I COL
3.« X CO
ICflG
2,4 X CO
1972
FTP
7.78
91.9
271.9
1.80
20. 1
1975
FTP
6. 74
85.0
271.5
1.84
20.8
UTHER
TFSTS!
HOT
START
6,49
83.4
269.5
1.73
21.1
NONE
HFF.T
2.03
55.3
219.5
2.14
28.4
146
68 AMMO JAVE 232
COLD
TRANS
6,62
95.5
411,3
2,93
15,2
COLD
STAB
U.43
102.0
336,1
1.55
17,4
IHCL
4367PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.49
58,1
314.8
3,43
21,3
IHCG
215PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.20
98.0
333,1
1 ,62
17,7
ICOL
4.2 X CO
I COG
4.1 X CO
1 972
FTP
5,50
9fl, 9
372.7
2.22
16,3
1975
FTP
4,63
88,5
345.9
2,36
17,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.85
78,6
324.2
2,50
19,3
NONE
HFET
1 .65
16.4
299.8
4.76
26,8
147
68 BUIC RIVE 430
COLD
TRANS
5.91
122,7
367. 1
2.4?
IS,3
COLD
STAB
4.24
79,3
340.5
1.86
18,5
IHCL
2043PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.32
46, 1
323. 1
3,73
21.9
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
3,90
64.0
335,7
2,02
19.8
ICOL
0,5 X CO
ICOG
1.6 X CO
1972
FTP
5.05
100.4
353,4
2.13
16,8
1975
FTP
4,33
79,2
341,2
2,50
18,5
OTHER
TESTS*
HOT
START
3,66
55.3
329,6
2,85
20,7
NONE
HFET
2,69
46.5
259,2
3,23
26,0
148
68 CAO I DEVI 472
COLD
TRANS
7.91
168,2
750.8
2.02
8.5
COLD
STAB
5.61
139.3
729.8
2,77
9.2
IHCL
1940PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.47
151.9
570, 1
2.77
10,7
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,07
122.2
689.1
2,82
9,9
ICOL
1,5 X CO
ICOG
1.2 X CO
1972
FTP
6.73
153.4
740,0
2.40
8.9
1975
FTP
6,05
148.8
689,9
2,61
9.4
OTHER
TESTS*
HOT
START
5,27
136,6
631 ,2
2,80
10,3
NONE
HFET
3.23
86,9
469.8
3.72
14,4
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
85 CARBONSHYDROGEN
RATIO
161
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DFNVtR
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
--•••grams i
HC CO
PER MILE-
C02
> • — • •
NC1XC
MPG
FUEL
E CON
149
6fl CHEV STAW 230
COLD
TRANS
17,64 203.9
447.8
1.73
10.8
COLD
STAB
13.62 165.9
4 30 ,1
0.73
12.1
IHCL
710PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
15,15 162.0
371 .7
1.44
13.2
IHCG
70PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.11 15^,8
395, 1
0.61
13.3
ICOL
1.1 X CO
I COG
1.3 * CD
1972
FTP
15.57 184.a
438.7
1 .21
11.a
1975
FTP
14.88 172,8
417.6
1.13
12.1
OTHER
TESTS J
HOT
START
12.05 158.3
383.7
1.01
13.2
NONE
HFET
3,70 76.6
349,5
2,22
18,4
150
68 CHEV STAW 307
COLD
TRANS
12.51
98.3
486.2
4.37
13.0
COLD
STAB
13,31
113.7
478.8
2.31
12.7
IHCL
6069PPM CARBON
HflT
TRANS
10.36
107.H
371 .4
2.01
15.5
IHCG
500PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
12,76
124, 1
470 .8
1.80
12.6
ICOL
2,2 X CO
ICflG
1,0 % CO
1972
FTP
12.92
106.2
482. U
3.31
12.9
1975
FTP
12.33
108.8
450.6
2.66
13.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1 1.59
116.2
422.4
1.90
13.8
NONE
HFET
3.93
78.8
428.3
2.8?
15,7
151
68 CHEV CAMA 327
COLD
TRANS
10.29
103.0
«83.7
a .07
13.1
COLD
STAB
8.14
71.7
466.0
3.65
14.7
IHCL
7959PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.69
75.9
409.0
3.55
16,2
IHCG
840PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10.13
100.2
421 .8
2.49
l«.b
ICOL
3.3 * CO
ICOG
4.0 X CO
1972
FTP
9.19
86.9
474 .6
3.86
13.9
1975
FTP
8.19
79.4
453.9
3.71
1«.7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
8.Ufa
88.4
415.6
3.01
15.3
NONE
HFET
4.80
65. 1
323.5
3,04
20.1
152
68 CHEV IMPA 307
COLD
TRANS
1 1 .58
115.6
558.1
4.86
11.4
COLD
STAB
7.51
69.5
547.0
4.72
13.1
IHCL
6765PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,56
72.1
510.9
5.72
13.8
IHCG
480PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.«3
62.6
539.0
4.99
13.4
ICOL
2,9 * cn
ICOG
2,0 X CO
1972
FTP
9,49
91.9
552.4
4.79
12,2
1975
FTP
8,10
79.9
539.3
5,03
12,9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7,01
67.2
525.3
5.34
13.6
NC.1NE
HFET
4,43
48.7
437.2
6.99
16.8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
a 1:1,
85 cakbon:hydrogen
RATIO
162
-------
APPENDIX C, CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE M()DL CID
TEST
TYPE
*•mmm\
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILF
CM2
m m m m m
Noxr
MPG
FUEL
ECON
153
68 CHEV MALI 396
COLD
TRANS
6,29
32.8
717.1
3.21
11.3
COLD
STAB
8.52
<43.2
768.7
2.23
10.3
IHCL
3382PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.87
43.7
591.2
2.79
13.0
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.96
41.6
731.9
2.18
10.7
ICOL
o.i * en
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
7,44
38.1
743.6
2.71
10.7
1975
FTP
7.60
41.1
70S. 7
2.59
11.1
OTHER
TESTS:
hot
START
7.95
42.6
663.4
2.48
11.7
NONE
HFET
1 .36
23.6
4 7 <1, 3
2.08
17.2
154
68 DODG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
9.07
164.2
572,3
4.15
10.3
COLD
STAB
6.59
116.3
503.0
3.51
12.5
IHCL
4715PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,«a
83.7
520.a
5.60
13.3
IHCG
laOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.31
112.2
497.5
3.71
12.8
ICOL
0.6 X CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
7.60
140.6
536.8
3.82
11.3
1975
FTP
6.79
118.3
522, 3
4,22
12.2
(1THER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.89
98. 4
508,6
4,63
13.0
NONE
HFET
4.10
56. 1
457,8
6.77
15.9
155
68 FORD MUST 200
COLO
TRANS
4.62
102.6
452. 1
5.76
14.1
CflLD
STAR
3.31
31.8
455,6
5.84
17,2
IHCL
2328PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.54
47.4
398.0
6.67
18,4
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
hot
stab
3.42
46,3
452.7
4,88
16,5
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
0.1 X en
1972
FTP
3.95
66.2
453.9
5.80
15,6
1975
FTP
3.65
50.9
4 38,9
6.05
16,7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,48
46.8
426. 1
5.75
17,4
NONE
HFET
2,35
34.3
329.8
2,08
22.7
156
68 FORD MUST 289
COLD
TRANS
8,44
68,5
462.3
4,00
14,9
COLD
STAB
7,03
91.3
410.4
2,63
15.4
IHCL
4775PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,44
50.9
391 . 1
3,86
18.3
IHCG
340PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,95
82.5
406,9
2.43
16.0
ICOL
4,8 X CO
ICOG
2,8 X CO
1972
FTP
7.72
80.2
435,7
3,30
15.1
1975
FTP
6.61
75.3
415.9
3,26
16.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,21
67.1
399.2
3,13
17.0
NONE
HFET
2,98
27.5
335,9
3.54
22.8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 111.
85 cawbon:hydrogen
R A T 1(1
163
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
( <_>
1 X
¦
i
i
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
m m m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
157
68 FORD MUST 302
COLD
TRANS
14.45
128,2
384,4
1,91
14,1
COLD
STAB
15.54
135.2
394,6
0,87
13,5
IHCL
1492PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
13.49
121.9
339.6
1,63
15,5
I HCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
14.89
134.3
402,9
0,94
13,4
ICOL
0.6 X Cfl
ICOG
3.0 * CO
1972
FTP
15,01
131.8
389,6
1.38
13,8
197b
F TP
14,74
130.0
377,2
1 .30
14.1
other
TESTS:
HOT
start
11,21
128.3
372,1
1,27
11,3
NONE
HFET
4.47
55.9
305,5
3.22
21.8
158
68 FnRD STAW 390
COLD
TRANS
7.14
123.7
637. 1
5.57
10,4
COLD
STAB
6,16
106.8
604,2
4.79
11,2
ihcL
4974PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,57
83,1
561 ,0
6.46
12,5
I HCG
370PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.92
103,3
599.3
4.61
11,4
I COL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
6,0 X CO
1972
FTP
6.64
115,0
620.2
5.17
10.8
1975
FTP
6.20
103.8
599. 1
5.42
1 l,«
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.75
93.4
580.6
5.51
1 1.9
NONE
HFET
4.04
54.7
467,8
6,82
15.7
159
68 MERC COUG 302
COLD
TRANS
7,67
59,6
489,7
4,30
14,6
COLD
STAB
5,13
43.0
512.3
3,81
14.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,59
60,0
432,6
4.02
16,3
I HCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,65
43.0
506. 0
3,62
15.1
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
4.2 * CO
1972
F TP
6,37
51.1
501,3
4.05
14.7
1975
FTP
5,79
51.2
485,5
3,97
15.2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5.21
51.3
470,3
3.82
15.6
NONE
HFET
2,71
16.6
357,9
5,61
22.6
160
68 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
7.90
119,4
534.5
2,49
11.9
COLD
STAB
4,94
76.7
532.9
2,1 1
13.3
IHCL
5074PPM CARBON
HOT •
TRANS
5,40
62,8
468,4
3,06
15.2
I HCG
360PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,86
68,0
517,9
2,07
13,9
ICOL
5.5 X CO
ICOG
5.5 X CO
1972
ftp
6,38
97,5
533,7
2,30
12,6
1975
FTP
5,69
81,8
515,4
2,46
13.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,02
65,5
493,8
2,55
la.5
NONE
HFET
3,35
41,3
369. 3
2.98
20.0
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A i:l.
85 CARBONjHYDROGEN
RATIO
16'+
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DFNVtR
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
test
TYPE
1
t o
1 X
1
1
GRAMS 1
CO
PER HUE.
C02
NOXC
MPf.
FUEL
ECON
161
68 PLYM SATE 310
cold
TRANS
15.72
225. A
414,5
2.11
10,8
COLD
STAB
5.31
67.3
481 .0
4.90
14,7
IHCL
9452PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.62
71.3
417,7
4.00
16,3
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,64
63.6
454,7
4.06
14,7
ICOL
5.6 * CO
I cor,
4.8 % CO
1972
FTP
10.37
144.4
449.0
3.55
12,5
1975
FTP
7.30
101.6
449,9
4.09
14.0
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
5.14
77.7
436.7
4.07
15,4
none
HFET
3.51
62.4
336.9
3.75
19,B
162
68 PONT GTO 400
COLD
TRANS
5.52
79,7
653.6
4.17
11.1
COLD
STAB
5.48
139.9
579.7
1 .59
10.9
IHCL
9730PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
tl ,0U
93.0
519.2
3.36
13,0
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
5.14
121.9
580.4
1.70
11.1
ICOL
4.7 * CO
ICOG
2.4 * CO
1972
FTP
5.50
110,6
615,7
2.84
11,0
1975
FTP
5,31
114.3
570.4
2.62
1 1.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
<1,99
107.9
554,7
2.55
12,0
NONE
HFET
2,70
45,6
454, 1
27
16,6
163
60 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
0,75
113.2
246,2
2.10
19,6
COLO
STAB
10,65
134.2
262,2
1.5?
17.5
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7,82
100,4
233, 1
1 .92
21.4
IHCG
620PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10,4a
132,3
250,2
1.32
18,1
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
7.6 X CO
1972
P TP
^.73
124.0
254.4
1 .04
18.5
1975
FTP
9.47
120.4
250,8
1.77
18.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
9,17
116.8
241,9
1.61
19.5
NONE
HFET
2.46
54.3
209.6
2.50
29,3
164
67 AMMO RAMB 232
COLD
TRANS
9,27
134,7
362.2
2.17
14,7
COLD
STAB
4,91
127.1
348.7
1.22
15,7
IHCL
4160PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.50
114.2
322.2
1.92
17,2
IHCG
190PPM HEXANt
HOT
STAB
5.23
132.0
337,8
0,99
15,8
ICOL
5.4 X CO
ICOG
2,8 X CO
1972
FTP
7.03
130.8
355.3
1 .60
15,2
1975
FTP
5.71
125.1
344.2
1.61
15,9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.07
123.4
330.2
1.4a
16.5
NONE
HFET
3.23
00.9
276.4
2.47
21.4
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
05 CARRONlHYDROGEN
RATIO
1 6b
-------
APPENDIX C, CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
X 1
O 1
1
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
fuel
ECON
165
67 BUIC SPEC 340
COLD
TRANS
9.55
217.6
398,3
0.63
11.5
COLD
STAB
9.2a
247,1
390. 1
0.27
11.0
IHCL
4755PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.22
220.6
355,9
0.56
12.2
IHCG
1200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.07
259.ft
394.7
0,29
10,7
ICOL
4,9 X CO
ICOG
a,5 X CO
1972
FTP
9.39
232,7
394, l
0,45
1 1.2
1975
FTP
9.02
233.6
382,3
0,43
11.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8.65
240.8
375.8
0.42
11.4
NONE
HFfcT
5.17
156.0
275,4
0.6?
16.5
166
67 CADI FLEE 429
COLD
TRANS
10.90
270,9
&8B.5
1.60
7,7
COLD
STAB
7.77
147.4
732,6
2.02
9.0
IHCL
2785PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
13.80
155,9
598,0
2.10
10,0
IHCG
260PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,59
141.4
700,0
1.92
9.3
ICOL
0.8 X CO
ICOG
1.0 X CO
1972
FTP
9,29
207.5
711,1
1.82
8,3
1975
FTP
10,10
175.6
686,0
1.95
8.9
OTHER
TESTS 1
HOT
START
11,12
148.5
650,3
2.01
9,7
NONE
HFET
13,18
127.3
479, 1
2.75
12.3
167
67 CHEV IMPA 250
COLD
TRANS
15,13
192.6
366.2
1 .69
12.4
COLD
STAB
1 1 .80
159.9
384.3
1 .66
13.2
IHCL
2104PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
10.79
181,4
329.8
l.«2
13.7
IHCG
30PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
11.94
161.5
373,5
1 .59
13.5
ICOL
0,4 % CO
ICOG
0,5 * CO
1972
FTP
13.42
175.8
375.5
1 .68
12.8
1975
FTP
12.22
172.7
365.4
1 .60
13.1
OTHER
TfcSTS!
HOT
STAKT
11.38
171.2
352.2
1.51
13.5
NONE
HFET
4.99
121.0
304,7
2.61
17.4
16B
67 CHEV IMPA 283
COLD
TRANS
16.45
183.5
439.1
1 .85
11.4
COLD
STAR
14.6?
218.7
424.7
0.83
10.9
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
12.10
174.2
370,8
1.39
13.0
IHCG
S20PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
13.26
207.7
397.3
0,78
11,6
ICOL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
15,51
201.6
431 ,7
1.33
11.1
1975
FTP
14.30
199.0
412.8
1 .20
11.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
12.70
191.4
384.4
1.07
12.2
NONE
HFET
6.40
93.2
332,1
2.58
17.8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RAT IO
1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TF ST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
m mm m m\
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
fc CON
169
67 CHEV MALI 283
COLD
TRANS
16.57
13a.8
«58,7
2,92
12.3
COLD
STAB
16.18
1^3,6
116,7
1 ,68
12.7
I HCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
12.73
1 12,8
388,1
2,15
11.6
IHCG
1000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
17,12
113,7
101,6
1,51
13.0
I COL
5.6 * CO
ICOG
7.6 X CO
1972
FTP
17. 10
139,3
137, 1
2,28
12.5
1975
FTP
16.33
133,2
117,6
2. 15
13.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
11,98
128,7
396,7
1,97
13.7
NONE
HFET
6,75
71,1
291,5
2,11
20.8
170
67 CHEV IMPA 327
COLD
TRANS
10,87
170,8
167, 1
2,76
11.5
COLD
STAB
7,89
111.3
165,5
2,00
12.5
I HCL
5A70PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.99
113.1
376,1
2,28
15.5
IHCG
U80PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7,99
111.3
161, 0
1,80
12.1
ICOL
1.9 * CO
I COG
5.8 X CO
1972
FTP
9.31
155,7
166,3
2,37
12.0
1975
FTP
7,99
139,7
111 , 1
2,23
12.9
OTHER
tfsts:
HOT
START
7,02
129,3
121,1
2,03
13.7
NONE
HFET
1,73
95,8
369,2
2.96
16.6
171
67 CHRY NEWP 383
COLD
TRANS
CO
•
o
330,0
522,5
1,06
7.8
cold
STAH
8,35
125,6
562,6
2,79
11.3
I HCL
6377PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.52
159,7
192,8
2,68
11.5
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,58
135,8
511,0
2,37
11.3
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
6.8 * CO
1972
FTP
19.12
225,1
513,1
1,95
9.3
1975
ftp
13,03
1 77,9
531,8
2,10
10.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
8,55
117,5
519,1
2,52
11.1
NONE
HFET
6,36
118.3
109,2
2.73
11.1
172
67 DODG CORO 318
COLD
TRANS
15.75
181,8
126,5
1.87
1 1.6
COLD
STAR
8.80
118,7
116,1
1.29
13,1
IHCL
6616PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8,62
129,8
382,9
1.88
11.1
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,87
155.9
102,2
1.19
13,1
ICOL
5.3 X CO
ICOG
1.2 X Cn
1972
ftp
12,18
161.8
121 ,2
1.57
12,3
1975
FTP
10,20
150.1
109, 1
1.57
13,1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
8,75
113,2
392,8
1.52
13.7
NONE
HFET
1,92
9a,5
332,1
2.3H
17.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 C ARBON J HYDROGEN RATIO
167
-------
APPENDIX C # CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCFDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
MPG
VEH .....GRAMS PER MILE-- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
CD2
NOXC
ECON
173
67 FORD CUST 289
COLD
TRANS
8.67
110.7
471.7
2,87
13.2
COLD
STAB
8.<18
137.7
430.3
1.32
li.2
IHCL
4576PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
6.94
117.a
369.8
1.77
15.4
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.20
144.7
423.3
1 ,20
13.1
I COL
a.6 * CO
ICOG
5.0 X CO
1972
FTP
8,57
12^.6
450,5
2.07
13.2
1975
FTP
8.09
126.4
422.2
1.77
13.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
7.59
131.5
397,3
1 .U 8
l«.l
NONE
HFET
3.59
75.9
318.7
2.40
19.8
174
67 FORD MUST 289
COLD
TRANS
9.10
130.3
389, 1
2.42
H.3
COLD
STAB
1 1.07
176,9
350.1
1.11
13.4
I HCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.30
132.0
327,3
1 .65
15.8
IHCG
640PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
1 1 ,05
183.7
336,4
0.83
13.4
ICOL
8.0 X en
ICOG
7.8 * C!)
1972
FTP
10,11
154.2
369, 1
1 .75
13.8
1975
F TP
9,89
154.7
351 .9
1.54
14.2
UTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
9,71
158,5
331.9
1.23
14.5
NONE
HFET
4,97
98,4
275.0
1.54
19.9
175
67 FORD GALA 390
COLD
TRANS
9. 08
118.0
591 . 3
4.76
11.0
COLD
STAB
5.63
67 .1
597.2
4.20
12.3
I HCL
3880PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
6.42
83.8
545. 1
5.27
12.7
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.84
99.6
592.8
3.78
11.6
ICOL
2.8 * CO
ICOG
2.0 x en
1972
FTP
7,31
91.9
594.3
4.47
1 1.6
1975
FTP
6.57
82.«
581 .5
«.61
12.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.12
91.9
569.6
U.50
12.1
NONE
HFET
4.63
86.9
435.5
".35
15.1
176
67 MERC MONT 390
COLD
TRAMS
1 1.45
144.1
620.2
6.35
10.1
COLD
STAB
10.24
135.1
574.7
5.30
10.8
I HCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.98
1 19.4
508.8
5,64
12,2
IHCG
840PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.77
131.3
545.7
4.92
11.3
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
9.6 X CO
1972
FTP
10.63
139.5
596.8
5.81
10.4
1975
ftp
10.42
132.6
365.9
5.61
11.0
OTHER
TF.STS:
HnT
START
9.87
125.5
527.8
5.27
11.7
NONE
HFET
5.17
74.1
443.5
6.27
15.4
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
lbd
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DENVER
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1
1
X 1
o I
1
GRAMS
CO
PER MILF
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
177
67 OLDS DELM 425
COLD
TRANS
14.35
238,5
563,7
1,77
9,0
COLD
STAB
1 1.06
152. 1
562,5
1 .26
10.6
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.13
160.1
490.2
1,43
U.5
IHCG
1220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10,60
134,2
536,9
1.11
11.4
ICOL
3.2 X CO
ICOG
3.a X CO
1972
ftp
12.66
194, 1
563. 1
1.51
9,8
1975
FTP
11.21
172,4
5U2, 7
1,41
10.5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
9,89
146,0
514,2
1.27
11.«
NONE
HFET
5,62
111,8
383,2
1.69
15.4
178
67 PLYM VALI 225
COLD
Trans
11.65
185,2
369.0
1,40
12.7
COLD
stab
7,61
136. 1
432,7
1 .49
13.2
IHCL
5969PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,28
120,3
387,3
2.04
14.9
IHCG
390PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
R, 29
148,0
421,0
1 .28
13.1
ICOL
4.9 * CO
ICOG
5.5 X CO
1972
FTP
9.68
160,0
401,7
l.«5
15.0
1975
FTP
8,19
142,0
406.8
1 .63
13.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7,31
134,5
404.6
1 .65
13.9
NONE
HFET
3,95
99,1
294,2
1 .48
19,2
179
67 PONT TEMP 326
COLD
TRANS
8,07
124.5
498,3
«.12
12.3
COLD
STAB
6,69
105,5
509,0
4,24
12.8
IHCL
7342PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,90
118,7
435.0
3.92
13.9
IHCG
540PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,63
118,1
480,3
3.47
12,9
ICOL
6,3 * CO
ICOG
6,3 x cn
1972
FTP
7,36
114,7
503,8
4.18
12,5
1975
FTP
6.76
113,1
486.2
4.13
12,9
OTHER
TESTSt
HOT
START
6,27
118,4
458.3
3,69
13,4
NONE
HFET
4. 30
87,5
341.4
3,64
18,0
180
67 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
6.71
49.5
254,6
2,64
25,1
COLD
STAB
9.31
61,5
271 ,8
1 .45
22,3
IHCL
9939PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.84
40,5
231, 1
1.97
28,3
IHCG
2000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
9.31
60,2
263,6
1.37
22.9
ICOL
5,6 X CO
ICOG
7.6 x en
1972
FTP
8.04
55,7
263.4
2,03
23,6
1975
FTP
7,80
53,2
256.9
1 ,84
24,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.63
50,6
247.8
1 ,66
25,2
NONE
HFET
1 ,90
17,1
216.3
2,76
35,6
Fllf-L
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 CARHfJN:HYDROGFN
RATIO
I6y
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
cn
C02
NOXC
ECON
001
74 8UIC LESA 455
COLD
TRANS
4.28
64.3
929,8
3.2«
B.5
COLD
STAB
2.62
10.8
971,5
1 .92
8.9
IHCL
759PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.88
16.5
791,a
3.a3
10.7
IHCG
U8PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.60
10.5
938.2
1.97
9.2
ICOL
0.1 * CO
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.43
36.8
951.2
2.56
8.7
1975
FTP
3.04
23.6
912.8
2.62
9.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.7a
13.a
866,7
2.68
9.9
MODAL
HFET
002
74 CHEV NOVA 350
COLD
TRANS
5.51
74.6
794,6
3.08
9.5
COLD
STAB
3.21
90.8
780,7
1.39
9.5
I HCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.34
69, 1
660,8
2.42
11.4
IHCG
960PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a. iu
120.5
.749.0
1.19
9.3
COL
6.5 * CO
ICOG
7.6 X CO
1972
F TP
4,33
83.0
787,5
?.21
9.5
1975
FTP
3.45
81.4
750,4
2.03
10.0
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
start
3.27
95.5
706, 1
1.79
10.2
003
74 CHEV MALI 350
-COLD
TRANS
2,36
40.4
801 .0
2.43
10.2
COLD
STAH
3.23
17.3
919.3
1 .67
9.3
I HCL
1083PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.24
27.8
721 . 1
2.13
11.5
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.78
21 .2
900,6
1 .48
9.4
ICOL
0.2 X CO
#
ICOG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
2.81
28.5
861 ,7
2.04
9.7
1975
FTP
2.77
25.0
839,5
1 .96
10.0
OTHER
TESTS:
MilDAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.01
24.4
813.2
1.79
10.3
004
74 OObG CHAR 318
COLD
TRANS
5.22
48.4
829,2
4,90
9.6
COLD
STAB
3.59
65.4
835,6
3.31
9.3
I HCL
4226PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.54
«0.7
735,3
5.40
11.0
IHCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.65
73.1
804.0
2.96
9.5
ICOL
6.2 X CO
ICOG
5.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4, 39
57.1
832,5
4,09
9.5
1975
FTP
3.92
55.0
806,4
4,22
9.8
OTHER
TESTS:
modal
HOT
HFET
START
3.70
57.3
770.6
4.15
10.2
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
17U
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'O
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
---••GRAMS 1
HC CO
3ER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
005
7a FORD TORI 302
COLD
TRANS
3,06
33,7
772.2
3,27
10.6
COLD
STAB
2,15
10,3
826,5
2,39
10,4
IHCL
1324PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2,57
12,7
700,4
3,23
12,2
IHCG
200PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
2,09
10,2
804,5
2,22
10,7
ICOL
0,1 X CO
ICOG
0,1 X CO
1972
FTP
2,59
21,7
800, 1
2,82
10,5
1975
FTP
2,46
15.9
780, 1
2,81
10,9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.33
11.4
753.8
2.71
11.4
MODAL
HFET
006
74 FORD CUST 351
COLD
TRANS
6,17
79.6
719.1
8.52
10.3
COLD
STAB
a,9i
93,0
719.1
5.29
10.1
IHCL
3612PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a. ou
52. 1
638,3
8.32
12.1
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.77
91.8
722.8
5.34
10.1
ICOL
8 X CO
ICOG
3.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.53
86.5
719,1
6.86
10.2
1975
FTP
4,93
78,8
696,7
6.80
10.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.41
72,5
681 ,7
6,79
11.0
MODAL
HFFT
007
7a OLDS DELT 350
COLD
TRANS
3.25
40,5
925.2
2.85
8.9
COLD
STAB
2.89
15,8
990.2
2.20
8.7
IHCL
560PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,05
30.5
813.4
2,78
10.2
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.16
15,7
950.3
2,15
9,0
ICOL
0,2 * CO
ICOG
0,2 X CO
1972
FTP
3.07
27,8
958,6
2.52
8.8
1975
FTP
3,01
25,0
927,5
2.50
9.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3,11
22,9
883.7
2.46
9.5
MODAL
HFET
008
7U PLYM DUST 318
CULD
TRANS
6,88
63,4
680.4
4.29
11.1
COLD
STAB
3,75
95.1
706.3
2.83
10.2
IHCL
3119PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,29
44,0
621.2
4.97
12.6
IHCG
235PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,55
86.9
699.4
3.13
10.5
ICOL
6,0 X CO
ICOG
a,9 X CO
1972
FTP
5,28
79,7
693.7
3.54
10.6
1975
FTP
4,56
74,3
677.2
3.73
11.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,91
66,0
661 ,3
4.02
11.4
modal HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
17l
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING Of- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH .--..GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO, YR MAKE MflDL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
009
7a PflNT CATA «0O
COLD
TRANS
5.80
sa,2
818,3
3,79
9.2
COLD
STAB
«,99
105,9
762,3
2.82
9.a
IHCL
5U03PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.28
80,9
683,5
a.ai
10.7
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
6,45
15a.3
707,a
2.21
9,1
ICOL
6,5 * CO
ICOG
6.0 X CO
1972
FTP
S.39
95.a
789,6
3,29
1975
FTP
5.2a
9a.5
752,2
3,afe
9,7
OTHER
TESTS!
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
5.88
1 16.6
695.8
3,28
9,9
010
7a VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
2.63
26. 1
277,5
3,39
27.2
COLD
stab
2.16
23.6
387,9
2,83
20,6
IHCL
2257PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.25
22.1
328,5
3.87
2a.o
IHCG
190PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1 ,99
20,7
378,9
2, 68
21.2
ICOL
2,6 X CO
ICOG
2,3 X CO
1972
FTP
2,39
2a,8
33«,1
3,11
23,3
1975
F TP
2,28
23.7
3a8,3
3,2a
22,6
OTHER
TESTS!
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.12
21.a
35a,a
3,26
22,5
01 1
73 AMMfl GREM 258
COLD
trans
5,11
19a.a
a02.8
0,59
1?.3
COLD
STAB
a,01
190,2
aa«, i
0,55
11.7
IHCL
2717PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.88
166.2
371 .a
0,55
13.8
IHCG
3a0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,76
18a,a
aai .2
0,a7
11.9
ICOL
5,1 X CO
ICOG
a,a x co
1972
FTP
a,5a
192,2
a26, l
0,57
12.0
1975
FTP
a.20
lfta.a
ai7.3
0,56
12.3
OTHER
TESTS!
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
3,82
175.5
a07.2
0,51
12.8
012
73 BUIC STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
5,06
b2.9
796.1
5,aa
9,9
COLD
STAB
3,61
39.9
819.9
3,51
9,9
IHCL
1835PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,20
26.9
723,8
5,08
11 .a
IHCG
290PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.25
ai.5
807, 1
3,59
10,1
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
2,1 X CO
1972
FTP
a,32
a6.3
808,3
a,a5
9,9
1975
FTP
3.80
39.0
788,2
a,35
10,3
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
3,23
3a,a
766,6
a,32
10,7
FUfcL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1»1,85 C ARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
1 r
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i (_>
¦ X
i
i
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE-
C02
¦ • • mm
noxc
MPG
FUEL
ECUN
013
73 BUIC ELEC 455
COLD
TRANS
4,32
46.5
1032.«
5,78
7.9
COLD
STA8
2.71
15.0
1042.1
4.46
B.3
IHCL
963PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.79
18.2
857.3
6.67
9.9
IHCG
135PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.65
13.7
1005.6
4.65
8.6
ICOL
0,6 * en
ICOG
0.4 x CO
1972
FTP
3.^9
30.a
1037.3
5.10
8.1
1975
FTP
3.07
22.5
968.8
5.35
8.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.72
15.9
933.4
5.63
9.2
MODAL
HFET
014
73 CADI DEVI 472
COLD
TRANS
rvj
•
75.7
977.4
3.69
8.0
CULD
STAB
2.21
9.2
1086.7
a.08
8,0
IHCL
455PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
1,70
12.2
906,8
4.29
9,5
I HCG
80PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.11
11.5
1 003,4
3.43
8.6
ICOL
0,6 X CO
ICOG
0.5 X en
1972
FTP
5.2^
ttl .6
1033,5
3,89
8,0
1975
FTP
2.56
23.9
1013.9
4.06
8.4
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
start
1 .95
1 1.8
956.4
3,85
9.0
015
73 CAPR CAPR 122
COLD
TRANS
3,47
44.5
434. 1
4.36
1 uz
COLD
STAB
2,58
41.6
422. 7
2.37
17.9
IHCL
6993PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,40
27.6
377.7
3.98
20.7
I HCG
1000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.39
40.5
431 ,2
2.12
17.7
ICOL
5.3 * en
ICOG
3.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.01
43.0
428,2
3.34
17.6
1975
FTP
2.72
38.3
412,6
3.24
18.4
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.39
34.2
405, 1
3,03
19,0
016
73 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
6.29
88.4
432.3
2.83
15.0
COLD
STAB
0.75
81.3
387,9
2.42
16,7
IHCL
8553PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.51
54,8
359,7
3.25
19,4
IHCG
500PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.51
89.6
369, 1
2.44
16.8
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
7.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.50
84.8
409,5
2.62
15.8
1975
FTP
4.73
75.5
389,4
2.73
17.0
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
4,54
72.7
364,5
2,83
18.0
FUE-L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARSON:HYDPOGEN RATIO
17 J
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING (IF FEDERAL TF ST PROCEDURE RESULTS
LIN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i i_>
1 X
i
i
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
017
73 CHf- V VFGA 140
COLD
trans
3.67
60.0
488.8
4.80
14.9
COLD
stab
2.13
40.0
474.6
4.56
16.3
IHCL
2012PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.15
29.3
431.6
5.35
18.3
IHCG
205PPM HEXANE
HOT
star
2.00
36.7
459.3
«.35
17.0
ICOL
4.2 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
ftp
2.08
49.7
481.5
4,67
15.6
1975
FTP
2.46
41 .2
465.7
4.83
16.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.07
33.1
445.B
4.83
17.6
MODAL
HFET
018
73 CHEV CHEL 30/
COLD
TRANS
9.03
61.3
760.7
5.67
10.0
COLD
STAB
6.47
27.5
778.7
«.15
10.5
IHCL
5434PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.61
37.3
620,4
5.67
12.7
I HCG
125PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.48
30.5
701 .9
3.65
11.5
ICOL
1.5 X CO
ICOG
1,4 X CO
1972
FTP
7.71
43.9
769.9
4.89
10.3
1975
FTP
7.04
37.3
731.0
4.89
10.9
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
7.06
33.8
662.2
4.63
12.0
019
73 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
trans
4.95
58. 1
665.8
3.28
1 1.5
COLD
ST AH
3.83
16.1
746.9
2.95
11.3
IHCL
1 179PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.50
21.2
607.7
3.79
13.7
I HCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,83
17.1
733.5
2.48
11.5
ICOL
0.7 X CO
ICOG
0.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4.38
36.6
707,4
3.11
11.a
1975
FTP
3.70
26.3
691 .3
3.25
11.9
OTHER
TESTS!
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.67
19.1
672,3
3.12
12.5
020
73 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
TRANS
3.46
44.9
670.5
3.15
11.8
COLD
STAB
2.26
29.0
892.6
2.51
IHCL
781PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.27
31.9
694,2
3.10
11,8
I HCG
110PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.22
32.2
887,7
2.36
9.4
ICOL
1.7 X CO
ICOG
1.4 X CO
1972
FTP
2.84
36.7
780.5
2.82
10.4
1975
FTP
2.51
33.1
791 , 1
2.81
10.4
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.24
32.0
793.5
2.72
10.4
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CAKHONtHYDROGEN RATIO
1 /4
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURE RESULTS
(IN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
•
1 o
• X
I
9
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE-
C02
¦ • m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
021
73 CHEV CAMA 350
COLD
TRANS
1.92
1 1 .6
639.5
3.18
13.a
COLD
STAB
1 .46
16.0
725.0
1.54
1 1.8
IHCL
635PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1 .60
1 1.0
637,7
3.17
13.4
IHCG
110PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.45
21.2
722.6
1.39
U.7
ICOL
0.4 * CO
ICOG
0.4 * CO
1972
FTP
1.68
13.9
683,a
2.34
12.5
1975
FTP
1 .59
13.7
682.9
2. in
12.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
1.52
16.3
681 .3
2.26
12.5
MODAL,A/C HFET
022
73 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
3.20
21.8
685,3
5.24
12.2
COLD
STAB
2.51
32.1
656.1
3.09
12.4
I HCL
1694PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.45
18.7
586,5
5.16
14.2
IHCG
165PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
2.47
36.2
623,0
2.78
12.9
ICOL
1.5 * CO
IC(JG
0.9 * CO
1972
ftp
2.65
27.1
670 ,4
4.14
12.3
1975
FTP
2.64
26.2
642,9
4.11
12.8
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HF E T
START
2.06
27.6
605.2
3.93
13.5
023
73 CHEV CAPR 400
COLD
TRANS
3.85
51.8
866,0
3.53
9.2
COLD
STAB
1,73
37.5
905,6
2.22
9.2
I HCL
930PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,07
28,1
760,5
«.77
10,9
IHCG
145PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
1.79
35.5
862,6
3.26
9.6
ICOL
2,1 X CO
ICOG
1.7 * CO
1972
FTP
2,76
44.4
886,3
2.86
9.2
1975
FTP
2.27
37.9
857.0
3.20
9.6
OTHER
TESTS:
M[)DAL
HOT
HFET
START
1.93
31.9
812.9
3.99
10.2
024
73 CHRY NfcWP 400
COLD
TRANS
4.27
73.7
898.5
4.61
8.6
COLD
STAB
2.96
57,0
958.2
4.71
8.4
I HCL
2207PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.42
42.5
781.5
4.44
10,4
IHCG
170PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
3.02
62.1
902.1
4.78
6,8
ICOL
4,0 X CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.59
65,1
929.1
4 .66
8,5
1975
FTP
3.08
56.5
896.7
4,62
8.9
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.73
52.6
8a3.4
4.62
9.5
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,65 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
17o
-------
APPEND IX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MUDL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
X 1
O |
t
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
025
73 DATS OELU 71
COLD
TRANS
a. 99
79.3
370.1
4.22
17.2
COLD
STAB
3.34
55.8
353.6
3.56
19.6
1HCL
7245PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.59
52.3
340,7
4.48
20.1
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
2.81
49,5
335.2
3,38
21,0
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
4.4 * CO
1972
FTP
a. la
67.2
363.6
3.88
18.4
1975
FTP
4.31
59.7
35«.3
3.95
19.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.16
50.8
337.9
3.92
20.6
MODAL
HFFT
026
73 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRAnS
5.34
89,1
715.8
5.23
10,2
COLD
STAB
2.82
59.5
631 .8
4.58
12.1
IHCL
601 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,68
48,0
545,3
5.71
11.1
IHCG
70PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.42
«7,1
617,9
4.49
12.7
ICOL
0.3 x cn
ICOG
0.4 X CO
1972
ftp
4.05
73.9
672.7
4.89
U.l
1975
FTP
3.31
62.5
625.4
5.03
12.1
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
2.55
47.5
582.6
5.09
13.3
027
73 DODG CHAR 318
COLD
TRANS
5.65
101.3
682.9
3.45
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.46
77.3
696, 7
2.58
10,7
IHCL
2314PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,89
48,0
605.3
3,90
12.9
IHCG
365PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.21
71.6
676.2
2.57
11.1
ICOL
4,0 X CO
ICOG
5.3 X CO
1972
FTP
".53
88,9
690.0
3.00
10.5
1975
FTP
3.76
74.2
66H.5
3.12
11.1
OTHER
TESTS I
HOT
START
3,05
60,1
642.7
3.22
11.9
MODAL # A/C
HFET
028
73 FORD STAW 122
COLD
trans
6.05
62.7
400.1
3.27
17,1
COLD
STAH
2,86
56,8
437.2
2.92
16,6
IHCL
3220PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.21
42.1
387.6
3.95
19,1
IHCG
340PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.02
55.6
444.8
2.91
16,4
ICOL
5.1 X CO
ICOG
4.4 X CO
1972
FTP
4.42
59.6
419.1
3.09
16,8
1975
FTP
3,63
53.9
415.7
3,28
17.3
OTHER
TESTS!
MODAL
HOT
HFET
START
3.11
49.0
417.0
3,42
17,6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON J HYDROGEN RATIO
176
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YP MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
.....I
HC
3RAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NfJXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
029
73 FnRD MAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
6.5a
69,9
527.2
3.82
13,5
COLD
STAB
3,57
6«,7
53a.8
2.3a
13,7
IHCL
1956PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,86
ao,5
a6i .o
3.73
16,6
I HCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.18
59,1
539,3
2.07
13,8
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
2.1 X CO
1972
FTP
5,01
67.2
531 ,1
3.06
13.6
1975
FTP
3,99
59,1
512,7
3. oa
l a.a
OTHER
TF STS:
HOT
START
3.02
50,0
501,2
2.A8
15.1
MODAL
HKfcT
030
73 FORD MAVE 302
COLD
trans
6,76
85,7
673,5
a, 14
10.7
COLD
STAB
5.72
118,7
685, 1
1 .62
10.0
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a.98
67,3
608,3
2.95
12,2
I HCG
700PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.61
130.8
639,1
l .as
10,3
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
7.0 * CO
1972
FTP
6,23
102.7
679,5
2.85
10,3
1975
FTP
5,73
97,6
661 ,a
2,52
10.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,82
99,9
624, 1
2,19
11.1
MHDAL
HFET
031
73 FORD MUST 351
COLD
TRANS
6,97
115,9
550,a
l .ae
11.1
COLD
STAB
5,35
132,7
602,3
1.70
10.7
IHCL
2193PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a,82
117.8
a98.5
1.65
12.7
I HCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,34
1 3a.6
587,3
1 .62
10.9
ICOL
3.9 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
6,14
139.1
577,1
1.59
10,9
1975
FTP
5,54
131.3
562,7
1,6a
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,09
126.a
5aa, 1
1.63
11.7
MODAL
HFET
032
73 FORD TORI 351
COLD
TRANS
3,39
50,7
872,9
5,03
9.2
COLD
STAB
2,99
50.2
857.0
?.75
9.a
IHCL
24R8PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,52
28,7
740,3
4,85
11.2
IHCG
26 0 PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,99
52,1
837,2
2,6a
9.6
ICOL
3.9 X CO
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.19
50.a
86a, 7
3,86
9.3
1975
FTP
2,^5
4a.3
827,9
3.81
9.8
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2.76
ao.7
790, 1
3.72
10.3
MflDAL, A/C HFET
FIJFL FCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
177
-------
APPENDIX C » C 0 M ' f)
LISTING OF Ff-OERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN INDIVIDUAI VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
N(1 .
YR M AK y MOL1L C ID
TEST
TYPE
HC
grams
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
o 33
7 3 FORD LTD 400
COLD
trams
tJ.46
75.5
764.6
13.40
9.9
COLD
STAB
4.95
142.5
737 .7
11.37
9.1
IHCL
SS22PPM C ARBPN
HOT
TRANS
3.75
M .4
685.6
14.90
11.0
IHCG
380PPM HEXANb
HOT
ST AH
a.ai
1 32.2
750.0
11.31
9.1
I c n l
6,5 x cn
I COG
5.7 x r n
1972
FTP
^.71
109.9
750.8
12.3H
9,5
1975
FTP
4.51
1 08.8
728.9
12.78
9.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
a,09
102.6
71R.b
13.06
9.9
MODAL,A/C
HFfc T
034
73 FORD STA* aoo
cold
TRANS
6.04
100,3
984,7
4.07
7.6
cold
STAH
2.69
43.4
1030,9
2.26
8.0
IHCL
1 71 OPPM CARBON
HOT
TKANS
3. 78
51.1
854.3
3.54
9.0
INLG
200PPM hexanf
HOT
STAB
2.72
39.3
1010.0
1 .86
H.2
I COL
0.4 % CO
ICOG
o.5 x cn
1972
F TP
4.32
71.1
1008,0
3.14
7.6
19/5
F TP
5,69
57.4
972.2
2.99
8.3
0 T HE R
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.20
"5.1
934 .2
2.68
8.7
MOQAL HFET
035
73 "lAZD RX2 7 0
COLD
TRAnS
5.80
27.0
484.8
1.51
lb. 3
COLD
ST AH
6.10
30.8
7 0 3.8
1.33
11.5
IHCL
2187PPK CARBON
HO r
I R A m S
7.03
35.4
535.0
?. 12
U.5
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
ST AH
7.23
36.6
710.0
1.42
11.2
ICPL
0.8 X CO
ICOG
0.9 x cn
1972
F TP
5.97
28.9
597.2
1.42
13.0
1975
FTP
6.30
31.3
611.2
1 .59
13,0
OTHER
TESTS:
MODAI..
HOT
HFET
START
7.13
37.0
620,8
1.76
12.6
036
7 i MfRC mARQ 4 ?9
COLD
TRANS
5.10
45.3
72 7 .0
4.4k
10,9
COLD
stah
3.63
27.0
8 84 .0
?.91
9.5
IHCL
2016PPM C ARHON
HOT
trans
5.17
34. 1
735.5
4,78
11.0
IHCG
270PPM HFXANE
HOI
STAB
4.42
23.7
870 .5
3.05
9.6
ICUL
1.0 X CD
ICOG
0.9 x cn
1972
F TP
4.35
35.9
807 .6
3.67
10.1
1975
FTP
4,37
32.8
809,9
3.76
10,1
OTHER
TFSTS:
•10DAL
HOT
HFET
START
4 , 79
28.8
800 ,8
3.89
1 0. i
HIEI. ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 C ARBON : H YDPOGF fJ K A Tin
1 tr,
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.-...grams per mile
HC CO C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
037
73 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
2.74
25.9
771 . 3
2,84
10,8
COLD
STAB
1 .77
9.7
901.6
1 ,94
9.6
IHCL
7 80PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.01
12.9
712.7
2,83
12,0
IHCG
100PPM hexane
HOT
STAB
1.81
9. 1
870,4
1 ,93
10,0
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
2,24
17.6
838.2
2,38
10,2
1975
FTP
2.04
14.0
822,0
2,38
10,4
OTHER
TF STSS
HOT
START
1.91
10,9
793,7
2,57
10.9
MODAL
HFET
038
73 OLDS OfcLT 455
COLD
TRANS
5.74
59.7
871,2
7,10
9.0
cold
STAB
3.17
37.0
828,4
6.0 0
9.9
IHCL
8664PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.46
23.8
749,6
8,30
1 1.?
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.27
35.5
813.1
5,77
10.1
ICOL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
2.2 * cn
1972
FTP
4.42
48.0
849,3
6.54
9.5
1975
FTP
3.51
38.1
815,5
6.87
10.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.88
29.8
782,2
7.00
10.6
MODAL
HFET
039
1h PLYM SATE 318
COLD
TRANS
6.45
110.3
726,3
5.89
9.6
COLD
STAB
4.93
123.9
741 ,5
3,75
9.3
IHCL
3511 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.41
85.6
636,8
6,09
11.3
IHCG
1290PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.17
130.3
719,6
3,39
9.4
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
4.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5.67
117.3
734 , 1
4,79
9.5
1975
F TP
5.10
110.5
709,3
4,85
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
4.80
108.6
679.3
4,70
10,3
modal
HFET
040
73 PLYM FURY 360
COLD
TRANS
8.65
144, 1
791 .0
3,40
8.5
COLD
STAB
8.47
240.9
735,8
2,25
7,8
IHCL
6037PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,70
162.6
678,9
3,28
9,3
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,29
246.7
714,4
2,08
7,9
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
8.56
193.8
762.7
2,81
8.1
1975
FTP
8.02
198.9
731,6
2,78
8.3
OTHER
TFSTS:
HUT
START
7.52
205.7
697, 1
2,67
8.5
MODAL
HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A l!l,85 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
1-7 S)
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING flh FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
IN HOUSTON
MPG
VfcH
GRAMS 1
PER MILE
.....
fuel
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NO X C
ECON
04 1
73 PONT VENT 350
COLD
TRANS
6,32
68.8
758.2
5.02
10.0
COLD
ST AH
6.41
83.5
673.8
2.24
10.8
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.85
46.1
569.1
5.92
13.5
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.64
84.2
622.2
2.22
I 1.4
ICOL
6.5 X CO
icon
4. ft * cn
1972
FTP
6, 36
76.4
714.9
3.60
10.4
1975
FTP
5.96
70.1
662.4
3.85
11.2
OTHER
TESTS;
HOT
start
5.77
65.7
596.3
4.02
12.4
MdDAL
HFET
042
7 J PONT BONN 400
COLD
TRANS
6.95
81.4
9H3. 1
4.58
7.«
COLO
STftB
5,96
154.4
722.7
2.26
9.0
IHCL
5232PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAnS
4.56
75.2
694,4
4.50
10.7
IHCG
380PPM HFXANF
HOT
stab
5.80
152.6
710.1
2.34
9.2
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6.4 % CO
1972
FTP
6.44
1 18.8
849.4
3.39
8.4
1975
FTP
5,78
117.1
769.3
3.37
9.1
OTHER
T hSTS:
HOT
START
5.20
1 15.0
702.5
3.39
9.9
MODAL # A/C
HFE T
04 i
7 j TOYO cnwfj 120
COLD
TWANS
4.96
81.2
4 1 4 , i
4. 1(1
15.9
COLO
STAB
2.37
36.7
4 B 2 . S
4.28
16.2
IHCL
9610PPM C4RHON
HUT
TRAnS
2.53
27.2
400.8
5. Oh
19.7
IHCG
630PPM HEXANE
HfJT
STAB
1 .98
21.9
486.0
4.15
16.8
ICOL
3.5 X CO
ICOG
2.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.63
58.4
449.1
4.19
16.1
1975
FTP
2.95
43.4
445.4
4.46
17.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
S T A T
2.25
24.5
444.5
4.60
18. 1
MODAL
HFET
044
73 VOLK SE'DA 97
COLD
TRANS
5.95
94 .4
413.7
5.49
15.3
COLD
STAB
4.76
70.9
449. 1
4.02
15.4
IHCL
3723PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
5.32
59.7
386. 1
4.96
17.9
IHCG
385PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
5.94
70,1
472.4
4.80
14,8
ICOL
4.3 X CO
ICOG
3.3 X CO
1972
FTP
5.34
82.4
431.9
4.74
15.3
1975
FTP
5.17
72.7
424.2
4.59
16.0
OTHER
tests:
HUT
START
5.64
65. 0
430.4
4 . 8H
16.1
MODAL
HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
IhU
-------
APPENDIX C » CONT•D
LISTING OF FEDE-RAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VtHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR HAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
-----GRAMS 1
HC CO
»ER MILF
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
045
73 VOLK STAW 103
COLD
TRANS
24.51
49.0
498.4
3.66
13.6
COLD
STAB
2.34
43,9
677.6
2.23
11.8
IHCL
1537PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.83
43.8
501.5
3.24
15,3
IHCG
170PPM HEXANE
HOI
STAB
8.51
59.0
630.4
2.16
11.8
ICOL
3.5 * CO
ICOG
j.n * CO
1972
FTP
13.13
46.4
590.4
2.93
12.6
1975
FTP
7.12
44.9
591 .2
2.81
13.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
5.75
51.6
567,7
2.69
13.3
MODAL
HFET
046
72 BUIC LESA 350
COLD
TRANS
3.80
54.9
773,3
6.25
10.2
COLD
STAB
3.4«
52.2
823.5
4.78
9,7
IHCL
1880PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.44
78,3
612.6
4.31
11.9
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.41
128.1
725.4
2.48
9.4
ICOL
2.2 * CO
ICOG
1,5 * en
1972
FTP
3.61
53.5
799.1
5,50
9,9
1975
FTP
3.51
60,0
754,5
4,96
10,3
OTHER
TFSTSI
HOT
START
3.94
103.9
670,5
3.37
10,5
M0DAL
HFET
047
72 BUIC ELEC 455
COLD
TRAMS
3,01
34,2
998,5
11 ,79
8.4
COLD
STAB
2.29
19.5
966,7
8,54
8,8
IHCL
1 489PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.05
13.9
805.5
11,46
10,6
IHCG
165PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.27
16,5
944.2
8.79
9,1
ICOL
1.7 * CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
2.64
26,6
982.2
10.12
8,6
1975
ftp
2.37
21.0
928.6
10.03
9.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.16
15.2
876.7
1 0.09
9,8
MODAL
HFET
048
72 CHEV VEGA 140
COLD
TRANS
3.64
48.9
514,8
4.63
14,7
COLD
STAB
1 .79
31,5
606,8
3,09
13,4
IHCL
220PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.70
36.7
457.2
4.19
17.0
IHCG
50PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.29
28.9
604.7
2.56
13,6
ICOL
0.2 * CO
ICOG
0.2 X CO
1972
FTP
2.69
40.0
562.0
3.84
14,0
1975
FTP
2.«3
36.6
5«6,0
3.72
1«.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1 .98
32.7
532.9
3. 36
15.0
MODAL
HFf- T
FUEL
ECONOMY calculations i
ASSUME
A 1M.
85 CAKHON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
161
-------
A PPfc M) I X C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESUl TS
on individual vehicles in Houston
VP H
NO.
yr make «oni. cIr>
TEST
TYPE
-.-.-GRAMS 1
HC CO
°ER MILE
C02
m m m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUf-L
ECON
049
72 CHf-V VFGA mo
COLD
trans
8.55
69.2
409,0
3.80
16.3
COLD
STAB
a. 1 0
57.0
464.0
2.35
15.7
IHCL
20 1 6PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
4.99
49. 1
343.5
3.82
20.3
IHCG
165PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3."7
57.8
416.0
2.08
17.1
I COL
a. 1 X CO
I COG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
6.26
63.0
437 .3
3.06
16,0
1975
FTP
5.26
57.4
419.1
3.06
16.9
OTHf- R
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.21
53,6
380. 7
2.93
18.6
MODAL
HFET
050
72 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
trans
5.51
55.7
690. 3
4.06
1 1.2
COLD
stah
2.17
29.4
735.8
2.78
U .3
IHCL
PfllOPPM CARHON
HUT
t R A n s
2.23
25.6
645.2
3.81
12,8
IHCG
440PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
2. IB
27.9
703.9
2.72
11.8
ICOL
2.5 X CO
I COG
2.6 X Cn
1972
F TP
3.79
42.2
713.6
3.41
1 1.2
1975
FTP
2.88
33.8
701.1
3.34
11.6
OTHER
Th STS:
HOT
START
2.20
26.8
675.3
3.25
12.3
MODAL
HFET
051
72 CHEV hunt 350
COLD
TRAMS
4.15
59.0
662.0
5.90
11.6
COLD
STAB
2.81
44.3
678. 1
5.64
1 1.7
IHCL
1898PP" CARHUN
HOT
TRAMS
2.25
24.9
588.8
6.33
14.0
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.43
36.3
668. 1
3.87
12.1
ICOL
2.5 X CO
I COG
3.1 X CO
1972
ftp
3.46
51.5
670.3
4.74
11.6
1975
FTP
2.93
42.0
650.0
4.86
12.2
OTHER
TFSTSl
HOT
START
2.3a
30. 7
629.5
5.07
13.0
MflDAL
HFE T
052
72 CHEV NOVA 350
COLD
TRAMS
4.26
69.7
740.9
6.01
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.63
1 17.8
737. 1
2.90
9.5
IHCL
9056PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.39
75.2
649.8
5.53
11.4
IHCG
820PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.80
165.9
688.3
2.16
9.2
ICOL
6.5 % CO
I COG
9.5 X CO
1972
FTP
3.94
94 . 4
738.9
4.42
9.9
1975
F TP
3.70
95.9
713.7
4.28
10.1
OTHE R
TPsts:
HOT
START
4.11
121.8
669.5
3.80
10.2
MODAL HP E T
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.65 C A RBON: h YDWOGFN RATIO
(. o2
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PER MILE---- FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 N[1XC ECON
053
72 CHEV STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
3,66
61.8
1030,3
6,22
7.8
COLD
STAB
2,67
61.4
919,9
4,24
8,7
I HC L
2918PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,26
36,7
901,9
6.03
9,2
I HC G
285PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.77
61.6
904,6
a.21
8,8
ICOL
5.9 * CO
•
ICOG
a,a % en
1972
FTP
3,15
61.6
973,6
5.20
8.2
1975
FTP
2,76
54.6
938.0
5.15
8.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,52
49.5
903.3
5.09
9.0
MODAL
HFFT
054
72 CHEV IMPA 400
COLD
TRANS
5,17
90.6
736.5
4.41
9.9
COLD
STAB
3.83
86.3
789,3
3,09
9.5
I HC L
6088PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,14
60.6
688,2
4.47
11.2
IHCG
620PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a, a9
99.5
742,6
2.96
9.7
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6,5 X CO
1972
ftp
CC
•
88.4
763,6
3.73
9.7
1975
FTP
3.92
80. 1
750,2
3.75
10,0
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
3,83
80.6
716,1
3.71
10,4
MODAL
HFET
055
72 DATS STAW 97
COLD
TRANS
3,71
22.6
425,9
6.61
18,8
COLD
STAB
3,67
16.9
466,9
6.04
17,6
I HC L
3622PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3,03
16.9
381 .3
6.76
21.3
IHCG
335PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,85
18.1
442.2
5.97
18.4
ICOL
2,a % CO
ICOG
2.9 X CO
19 72
FTP
3,69
19.7
447,0
6.32
18.1
1975
FTP
3.50
18.1
434 .6
6.36
18.7
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
3,45
17.5
412.6
6.36
19 • 7
modal
HFET
056
72 DODG DART 318
COLD
TRANS
5,77
83.7
593,6
5.29
11.9
COLD
STAB
3,31
67.8
563,4
«.33
13.0
IHCL
2314PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,31
53,9
514,4
5.35
14.6
IHCG
260PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,88
83,1
562,9
4.05
12.6
ICOL
4.3 X CO
ICOG
4,0 X CO
1972
FTP
4,51
75,6
578,1
4,80
12.5
1975
FTP
3.82
67.3
556, 1
4.81
13.2
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
3,60
68,8
539,3
U.68
13.5
MODAL HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
Ifii
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN individual vehicles in Houston
MPr,
VtH .--.-GRAMS PER MILE----- FUFL
NO. YR MAKE MQDL CID TEST TYPE HC C Cl C02 NOXC tCON
057
72 DODG POLA '460
COLD
TRANS
20.09
152.8
680.0
7.78
9.0
COLD
stab
27.21
190.8
707 .0
6.83
8.1
IHCL
1 0052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
15.20
119.7
621 .9
7,57
10,3
I HC G
1U00PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
23.50
178.0
690.3
6.25
8,5
ICOL
5,9 % CO
ICOG
0.9 X CO
1972
FTP
23.90
172.3
696,2
7.29
8,5
1975
FTP
22.07
163.1
678,9
7,20
8,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
19.0fl
109.6
657,0
6,89
9,3
MODAL
HF E T
ose
72 FORI) PINT 12?
COLD
TRANS
5,90
58.8
070 .7
2,90
15.2
COLD
STAB
1 .68
26.6
526.0
2.85
15,5
IHCL
1173PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.02
20.9
030.5
3.60
18.5
I HC G
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.15
17.8
516,6
2,83
16.2
ICOL
0,1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
ftp
3.73
02.2
501 .0
2.90
15.3
1975
FTP
2,66
32.9
089.9
3.08
16.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1 .5ft
21.3
0 76.6
3.21
17.2
MODAL
HFF T
05V
72 FORD TORI 302
COLD
TRANS
0,79
55.3
690.5
5.10
11.2
COLD
STA0
3.02
31.0
706.9
3.12
11.0
IHCL
B050PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.80
22.0
628.0
5.01
1 3.2
I HC G
1S00PPM HEXANf
HOT
stah
2.50
28.7
700.0
3.32
11.2
ICOL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
1 .0 X CO
1972
FTP
0.09
03.0
719.5
0.08
11.1
1975
F TP
3.83
33.8
702. 1
«,17
11,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
3.18
25.5
6fl5,5
0,30
12,1
MODAL
HFET
060
72 FORD GALA 351
COLD
TRANS
7.06
191.8
567.2
1 .68
10.0
•
COLD
STAB
5.30
207.0
615,5
0.85
9.3
IHCL
1862PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.50
160.7
508.8
1 .09
11.3
I HC G
23SPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0,59
182.0
612.2
0.92
9.7
ICOL
2.4 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
F TP
6.18
199,6
592.0
1 ,25
9.6
1975
FTP
5.75
192. 1
575. 8
1 .20
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.03
173.6
561 .9
1 .20
lo.o
MflDAI. HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSU^F A 1:1.8b C A RBON j H YDROGE N RATIO
L tiU
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
—---GRAMS I
HC CO
°ER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
061
72 FORD GRAN 351
COLD
TRANS
6.02
75,0
768,9
9.88
9.8
COLD
STAB
3.58
85.8
788.1
7.25
9.5
IHCL
3622PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.89
67.9
668. 1
8.54
11.1
IHCG
170PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.79
101.8
743.0
6,37
9.7
ICOL
6,2 X CO
ICOG
3.7 X CO
1972
FTP
«.77
80.6
778.8
8.53
9.6
1975
F TP
5.01
78.6
750.8
8.16
10.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.30
85.3
706.5
7.43
10.4
MODAL
HFET
062
72 FORD STAW 400
COLD
TRANS
5.58
74.0
793,7
12.67
9.6
COLD
STAB
3.01
32.8
887,6
11.78
9.4
IHCL
1233PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3.52
25,0
730,0
14.89
11.4
IHCG
195PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.24
30.5
876. 1
1 1 .84
9.5
ICOL
1.0 X CO
ICOG
1.3 X CO
1972
FTP
a.26
52.8
841,9
12.21
9.5
1975
FTP
3.69
39.3
824,2
12.83
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
3.37
2 7.8
805.0
13.33
10.3
MOOAL
HFET
063
72 FORD LTDB 429
COLD
TRANS
5.38
151.8
783.5
4 .97
8.5
COLD
STAB
3.55
120.4
833. 1
5.46
8,6
IHCL
2666PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.43
105.5
684.5
5.97
10.3
IHCG
275PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.92
135.4
783.2
5.12
8.8
ICOL
4. 9 X CO
ICOG
<1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4.44
135.7
809,0
5.22
8.6
1975
ftp
4.18
122.8
781 .5
5.50
9.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
«.17
120.9
735.2
5.53
9.5
MODAL
HFET
060
72 LINC MRK4 <460
COLD
TRANS
5.05
74.6
849,6
7.93
9.0
COLD
STAB
2.19
22.0
926,9
7.17
9.2
IHCL
2287PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.84
29.7
823,0
11.40
10.1
IHCG
196PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.32
45.4
990. 7
8,92
8.3
ICOL
4.0 X CO
ICOG
3.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.58
47.6
889,3
7.54
9.1
1975
FTP
2.97
35.1
881.9
8,51
9.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.09
37.8
909. 0
10,13
9.1
MODAL
HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 151.0b CARBONjHYDROGFN RATIO
185
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE results
DN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VFH ---.-GRAMS PEW MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
065
72 MFHC STAW 400
COLD
TRANS
7,83
109.0
764.4
9.51
9,2
COLD
STA0
3,«1
101,8
780,0
9.55
9,3
IHCL
3270PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,73
63.9
676.7
11.71
11,2
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,38
110.4
757.5
9.27
9.4
I COL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
5.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5,56
105.3
772,4
9.53
9.3
1975
FTP
4.43
92.8
748,1
10.14
9.8
OTHER
Tt STSJ
HOT
START
3,55
87,8
718,2
10,46
10.2
MODAL
HF ET
0 66
7? OLDS DELT 350
COLD
TRANS
5,63
74.2
729.2
7,50
10.3
COLD
STAB
a, (19
79.2
773,7
6,67
9.7
IHCL
3079PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a,52
54,6
689, 1
9,00
11.2
IHCG
365PPM HEXANE
HOT
SI AH
(J ,76
104.6
738,9
5.84
9.7
ICOL
0.0 X CO
ICOG
3.« % CO
1972
FTP
5,05
76.8
752. 1
7.08
10.0
1975
FTP
4 ,7(4
71.3
740 ,9
7.49
10.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.64
80.5
714.6
7.38
10.4
MODAL
HFET
0 h 7
72 OLDS STAW
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES TN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HL
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECHN
069
72 PLYM VALI 225
COLD
TRANS
5.30
105, 4
531,9
6,28
12,4
COLD
STAB
2,6 4
54,3
464. 2
4.67
15.9
IHCL
3018PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,«9
90,8
453,3
4,45
14,6
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,20
73.0
498,4
4,20
14,2
ICOL
3,0 X CO
ICOG
2,5 X CO
1972
FTP
3,96
79,2
497,1
S.45
14,0
1975
FTP
3,4
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLFS IN HOUSTON
VEH
Ml,
YR MAKE MdDL CID
TtST
TYPE
.----GRAMS per mile
HC CO C02
NOXC
MPG
P UFL
ECON
073
7? TOYO CAWI 97
COLO
TPANS
«.3 6
55, u
414.2
6.92
17.2
COLD
stab
3.59
34.8
379,6
4.4 1
19,9
IHCL
7929PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
I.no
35.6
355,9
6,09
21.0
IHCG
790PPM HEXANf
HOT
STAP
3.90
3«.7
40 3,5
5.27
18,9
ICOL
1.7 * CO
I COG
0.9 x cn
1972
FTP
3,96
44,8
396,4
5,63
18,5
1975
FTP
3.70
39.3
38 0 , 3
5,40
19.6
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
3,66
35,1
38 0. 5
5,67
19.8
MODAL
HFf- T
0 74
72 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
4.59
69,2
399,2
5,22
17.0
COLD
STAB
3.46
50,5
461 , 1
4,44
16.1
IHCL
1128PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.31
45,2
375,1
4.72
19,4
IHCG
85PPM HEXANE
HflT
STAB
3.19
49.1
443.3
4.40
16.7
ICOL
1.9 x cn
ICOG
0.9 X CO
1972
FTP
4.01
59.6
431.0
4.82
16.5
1975
FTP
3,66
53.0
424 .3
4,68
17.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.25
47.2
4 10.1
4.55
1 7.9
MODAL
HFET
075
72 vol K St DA 97
COLD
trans
9.15
1 35.3
336.4
2.51
15.4
COLD
STAR
7.83
120.3
393.0
2.30
14.6
IHCL
3220PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.99
63.9
363.5
4.83
18.5
IHCG
2U0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
7.22
100.4
394.0
2.59
15.4
ICOL
«.a X CO
I COG
a.2 * CO
1972
FTP
H.48
127.6
365.4
2,41
15.0
1975
FTP
7.32
107.8
372,9
3.05
15.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.13
82.6
379, 1
3.68
16.8
MODAL
HFFT
07b
71 AMMO JAVE 304
COLD
trans
6.28
77.3
639, 0
6.61
11.4
COLD
STAB
3.05
43.5
711,2
3.46
11.2
IHCL
2113PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.37
37. 1
577,0
6,79
13.7
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.13
65,0
675,8
3.15
11.3
ICOL
2.2 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4.62
59.9
676, 1
4 .99
11.3
1975
FTP
<1,09
48,8
658.9
5.05
11.9
OThER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
3,73
51,4
627.7
4.92
12.3
NONE
HFET
FUtL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ¦
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBONtHYDROGEN
RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C f CUNT•0
LISTING Of- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VtH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
m m m m m
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
CL)2
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
077
71 RUIC SKYL 350
COLD
TRANS
5,25
70.1
657.a
0.67
11.3
COLD
STAB
0,90
77.2
761 .3
3.29
9.9
IHCL
6BU2PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.3fl
38.6
569,2
1.72
13.9
IHCG
580PPM HEXANE
HPT
stab
0,58
75.1
633,2
3.11
11.6
ICHL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6.0 X CO
1972
FTP
5,07
73.7
710.7
3.96
10.5
1975
FTP
0.55
65.0
686. 3
3.9fl
11.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.99
57.3
60?. 1
3.90
12.6
NONE
HFET
07 8
71 BUIC ELEC Q55
COLD
TRANS
7,26
181,6
721 .8
3.23
8.6
COLD
STAB
0,80
109,5
7 75,9
1.22
0.6
IHCL
327 0PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
0,07
133,0
550,0
2,68
11.1
IHCG
280PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
0.66
160,5
732 ,3
1 .OH
ft, 8
icriL
a,6 X CO
ICOG
0,0 X CO
1972
FTP
6,02
165. 1
709,6
2.20
8.6
1975
FTP
5.20
151.7
703,0
2,00
9.3
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
0,67
109,2
605.5
1 .86
9.9
079
71 CADI SEDA 072
COLD
trans
7,70
273.5
856.3
2.52
6.8
COLD
STAB
2.20
160,2
1016,6
1,0fl
6.9
IHCL
767PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.60
100,0
810.9
2.31
8.5
IHCG
92PPH HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.51
105,1
1009,3
1.53
7.1
I COL
2.6 X CO
ICOG
2.3 X Cn
1972
FTP
0.68
217,0
9 38,6
1 .99
6.8
1975
FTP
3.52
180,5
927 . 1
1.93
7.3
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2,65
102.8
910,7
1.91
7.7
080
71 CHEV VEGA 100
COLD
TRANS
5.25
66.5
391 ,8
2.87
17.3
COLD
STAB
3.51
56,0
090,8
2.18
15.0
IHCL
2M7PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.65
00,9
373.0
3.02
19.9
IHCG
215PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.01
67 .9
063.0
1 .76
15.3
I COL
3.0 X CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
1.35
61.3
002,7
2.52
16.1
1975
FTP
3.63
50.2
037 .5
2.56
16.6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
start
3,00
51.7
019,6
2.37
17.2
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CAKBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
lts^
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -.-.-GKAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MI101 CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
00 1
71 CHEV MALI 307
COLD
TRANS
«.75
49.7
687,0
6.65
1 1
COLD
ST AH
3.21
28.0
695,5
5.31
1 1 .«
IHCL
2817PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.91
20.7
61K.B
7.59
13. 4
IHTG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.29
2ft.7
687.7
5.61
12.0
I COL
2,6 X CO
I cor,
2,2 X CO
1972
FTP
3,9 6
38.6
691 .3
5,96
1 1.6
1975
FTP
3,45
30.5
672.4
6.22
12.1
UTHF R
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.1 1
23.8
654 .2
6.57
12.7
NONE
HFtT
082
71 CHEV IMPA 350
COLO
TRANS
6,59
69,6
71H.9
«.71
10.5
COLD
STAB
6,49
72,7
73B.7
3.22
10.2
IHCL
7144PPM CARBON
HOT
TRA.mS
5.0?
56.4
631 .6
4 ,
12.1
IHCG
950HPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
7.87
116.7
679.0
2.68
10.0
ICOL
5.7 X CO
I COR
4,7 X CO
1972
FTP
6.54
71.2
729.0
3.94
10,3
1975
FTP
6.11
67.5
704 ,8
3.91
10.7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
6.48
87 .4
655.9
3.61
10.9
083
71 CHfcV IMPA 350
COLD
TRAnS
5.02
105.1
fel 0 . 1
4.91
1 1.2
COLD
STA0
5.71
158.3
612.4
2.43
10.1
IHCL
4427PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.59
101.1
543.0
5.1 1
12, "
IHCG
540PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,1 1
1 70,9
598.5
2.31
10,0
ICOL
4.1 * CO
I COG
6.2 * CO
1972
FTP
5,38
132.4
611,3
3,64
10,6
1975
FTP
5,26
131.3
592,7
3.69
10,9
OTHER
TESTS:
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
5.37
137.0
571 ,5
3.67
11.0
084
11 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
trans
4,86
52.7
714.H
6.01
10.9
COLO
star
u. 13
42.0
747, 1
a.71
10.7
IHCL
3421PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.26
30.0
622.6
6.91
13.0
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
0,18
47.8
718,6
".55
11,0
ICOL
3.9 X CO
I COG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
4.49
17.2
731.4
5.34
10,8
1975
FTP
4,04
40.9
705.8
S.59
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.73
39. 1
672,0
5.70
11.9
FtlFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CAHBMN:HYDROGEN RATIO
190
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RtSULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH ..---GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
085
7i chev impa 400
COLD
TRANS
6,70
68.7
912.6
9,10
8.5
COLD
STAB
4,04
32.1
934.3
5.91
8.9
IHCL
2264PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.97
25.3
780.8
9,63
10,7
IHCG
2 0 OPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.97
30.2
954,2
6.67
8,8
I COL
0.7 * CO
ICOG
0,6 * CO
1972
FTP
5.34
49.9
923,8
7,46
8.7
197b
FTP
a,58
37.9
087,2
7.61
9.2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.97
27,8
869,8
8,11
9.6
NONE
HFET
086
71 CHRY 300 440
COLD
TRANS
7.52
126.2
762.4
6.95
9.0
COLD
STAB
4.79
94,6
746.8
6.55
9.7
IHCL
5333PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,47
74,6
674,2
8.04
11,0
IHCG
370PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
4.69
91.1
730,2
6,44
10,0
ICOL
3.4 * CO
ICOG
4.5 X CO
1972
FTP
6.12
110.0
754,4
6,74
9,4
1975
FTP
5.27
95.7
729,9
7.05
9,9
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
start
4,58
83.1
703,0
7.22
10,5
087
71 DATS 110 7 \
COLD
trans
12,88
68,9
429,4
2.14
15.3
COLD
STAB
2.92
29,3
416,4
2.79
18,8
IHCL
1805PPM CARBON
hot
TRANS
3.05
24,2
375,7
2,52
21,0
IHCG
225PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
2.25
24,4
394,8
2,69
20,2
ICOL
0,1 X CO
ICOG
0,2 X CO
1972
FTP
7.77
48.6
422.7
2,47
16,9
1975
FTP
5.04
36,2
407,8
2,58
18,5
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
start
2,64
24,3
385.5
2,61
20,5
088
71 DODG CHAR 318
COLD
TRANS
11.23
129,9
537.2
4.02
11.«
COLD
STAB
17.39
208.2
492.3
3.12
10.1
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
10,08
116.6
475,7
4.34
12.8
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
16.83
252.0
478,1
2.75
9.6
ICOL
6.5 * CO
ICOG
8.0 X CO
1972
FTP
14.39
170.1
514,2
3.56
10.7
1975
FTP
14.07
166.4
497, 1
3.65
11.0
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
13,54
186, 1
476,9
3.52
10,9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
1*1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
I ISTInG OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
mmmmm l
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
0H9
71 EORD PINT 12?
COLD
TRAnS
3.38
3^.3
383.2
6.25
19.8
COLD
STAB
2.72
16.0
423,6
6.33
19.4
IHCL
963PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.31
1«.5
36b. 6
6.84
22.4
IHCG
1?0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.94
15.0
427.7
6.27
19.3
ICOL
0,2 * CO
I COG
0,5 * CO
1972
FTP
3.Oil
24.9
403.9
6.29
19,6
197b
FTP
2.7«
19.4
399.0
6.45
20.3
OTHER
TESTSS
HOT
start
2.63
GO
•
ZT
397.5
6.55
20,7
none
HFt T
090
71 FORD MAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
3,49
U5.6
481 .7
9.44
15,7
COLD
STAB
3,43
55.0
470.1
7.56
15.6
IHCL
3723PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.30
27.8
443.1
9.96
17,9
IHCG
310PPM hFXANE
HOT
STAB
3.68
48.9
469. 1
7.54
15,9
ICOL
5,3 X CO
I COG
4,0 x en
1 972
FTP
3.4 6
50.4
475,7
8,47
15,7
1975
FTP
3.41
45.5
465. 0
8.62
16.2
OTHER
TFSTS:
NONF
HOT
HFET
START
3.49
38.6
456. 4
8.71
16,8
091
71 FORD TORI 302
COLL)
TRANS
5.31
47. 1
666. 7
8.24
11.7
COL D
STAB
4.50
60.6
659.2
5.21
1 1.5
IHCL
2738PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
«.51
39.4
592.6
8.23
13,3
IHCG
362PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.49
50.5
671 .6
5.57
1 1.6
ICOL
3,2 x cn
ICOG
3,5 X CO
1972
FTP
4,89
54.0
662,9
6.69
1 1,6
1975
FTP
4.67
51,9
642,3
6,68
12,0
OTHER
TESTSJ
NONE
HOT
HFt T
START
4.50
«5. 1
633, 1
6,86
12.«
092
71 FORD GALA 351
COLD
TRANS
6,83
98,4
644, 1
7,05
10,0
COLD
STAR
4,84
75,8
730,8
6.21
10,3
IHCL
2918PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4,93
44.3
583, /
8.64
13,3
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,59
68,4
676, 1
6.2P
11.1
icm.
4,1 x en
ICOG
3,7 X CO
1972
FTP
5.81
86.8
688.6
6.62
10.b
1975
FTP
5.28
71.8
671 .9
7.06
11.1
OTHER
TESTSJ
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
4,76
56.7
6 31,1
7.43
12.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCUI ATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARHQN:HYDROGEN RATIO
1 "2
-------
APPENDIX C.COMT'O
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1 1
1 1
1 X 9
1 O «
1 1
GRAMS
en
PER MILE
C02
NHXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
093
71 FORD BROU 429
COLD
TRANS
a.9i
5a.6
707,7
9,38
11,0
COLD
STAB
2.85
39.8
725. 1
7,81
11.1
IHCL
2515PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.35
2a.9
658.3
1 1 ,37
12.5
IHCG
210PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.88
.a
774.9
8,21
10,5
ICOL
4.3 * cn
I Cf.lG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.85
4 7,0
716.6
8,58
U.l
1975
FTP
3,42
38.8
702,9
9,13
11.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.11
33.4
718.1
9,75
u. a
A/C
HFET
094
71 MERC MONT 400
COLO
TRANS
11.87
128.2
771,5
9.78
8,8
COLD
STAB
4.08
101.0
797,2
10.95
9,2
IHCL
2558PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
4.00
54.0
721,0
12.73
10.8
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.78
93.2
801,6
11.18
9,2
I C(1L
4.4 X CO
ICOG
3,8 X CO
1972
FTP
7.87
114,2
784,7
10,38
9,0
1975
FTP
5,69
93.7
770,7
11.20
9.5
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3,89
74.2
762,4
11 ,93
10,0
095
71 OLDS STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
4.62
62,8
776,a
10,29
10,0
COLD
STAB
2.72
20.8
786.5
7.13
10.7
IHCL
1519PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,84
16,8
689.4
10,82
12,2
IHCG
170PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
2,95
26.8
766.9
7.11
10,8
ICOL
1,6 * CO
ICOG
1.1 * Cfl
1972
FTP
3.65
41.2
781.6
8.67
10.3
1975
FTP
3.15
28.5
757,5
8.82
10.9
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.90
22,0
729,2
8.92
11.5
096
71 OLDS 98 455
COLD
TRANS
3.99
50,7
862,0
9,31
9,3
COLD
STAB
3.42
69.7
837.6
6,10
9.3
IHCL
2666PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.22
33,5
764, 1
9,66
10.8
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,26
66.0
809.9
5,55
9.6
ICOL
3.5 X CO
ICOG
3.2 X cn
1972
FTP
3,70
60,5
849.5
7,66
9.3
1975
FTP
3,21
55,7
822,3
7,76
9.6
OTHFR
TESTS:
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
2,75
50,2
787,6
7,55
10,1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
193
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCFDURE RtSULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
097
71 PLYM DUST 225
COLD
trans
7.50
105.7
533.2
9.02
12.3
COLD
STAB
5.32
70.5
515.5
8.78
13.5
IHCL
4276PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.56
46.9
481.1
10.27
15,7
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.27
84.4
487.7
7.S3
13.9
ICOL
6. 0 X CO
ICOG
5.0 * CO
1972
FTP
6.38
91.7
524. J
8.90
12.9
1975
FTP
5.29
75.4
509.7
9.24
13.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.44
66. 1
484.5
8.86
14.7
NONf-
HFET
098
71 PLYM SATE 318
COLO
trans
3.72
39.2
598.3
7.41
13.2
COLD
STAB
2.96
34.5
598.5
5.91
13.4
IHCL
2042PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.78
27.1
563.8
8.51
14.4
IHCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
3.48
50.6
623.0
6.61
12.4
ICUl
? , 2 X CO
ICOG
1.9 X CO
1972
FTP
3.33
36.8
598.4
6,64
13.3
1975
ftp
3.07
33.4
588. 8
6.90
13.6
other
TESTS:
A/C
HUT
HFF T
start
3.14
39.2
594.2
7.53
13,3
099
71 PONT LEMA 350
COLD
TRANS
4,39
83,5
721 ,6
4,41
10,2
COLD
STAB
2,70
56.7
675.3
2.60
11.5
IHCL
4850PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,07
29.7
634.3
".35
12,9
IHCG
560PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
2.80
60.0
678.4
2.72
11.4
ICOL
5.7 X CO
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
f TP
3.52
69.8
697.8
3.59
10.8
1975
FTP
2.88
54.8
673.6
3.57
11.5
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.45
45.2
657.0
3.51
12.1
100
71 PONT GRNP 400
COLD
trans
6.27
60.9
797.9
7.86
9.7
COLD
STAR
5.95
84.4
742.2
6.37
9.9
IHCL
5182PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.08
42.8
701.1
8.67
11.4
IHCG
430PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.95
83.3
733,5
6.48
10,0
ICOL
5.6 X CO
ICOG
5,1 * CO
1972
FTP
6,1 1
73.0
769.3
7.10
9.8
1975
FTP
5.50
67.9
742.4
7.32
10.2
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5.04
63.6
717.7
7.54
10.6
FUEL ECHNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A lil.flb CARBONsHYDROGEN RATIO
1
-------
APPENOIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKF MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
• • • • m
NflXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
101
71 TOYO CORO 71
COLD
TRANS
2.87
24.9
365.3
7.19
21.5
COLD
STAB
3.«1
1 6.4
<»2 5.0
7.66
19.2
IHCL
2163PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.27
21.5
338.2
7.09
23.2
IHCG
400PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.50
15.a
401 .0
6.9a
20.3
I COL
0.5 * CO
ICOG
0.5 * CO
1972
FTP
3.15
20.5
396.0
7.43
20.3
1975
FTP
3.26
19.6
388.a
7.40
20.7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.39
18.a
370. a
7.01
21.6
NONE
HFET
102
71 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
trans
9,94
103,8
350. 1
2.08
16,3
COLD
star
6.10
59.3
422,6
1.71
16,6
IHCL
5031 PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
a,63
52.2
350,5
2.14
19, 8
IHCG
1180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.62
63,7
442,8
1.77
15,7
I COL
0.3 * CO
ICOG
0.7 * CO
1972
FTP
7.97
O
•
CO
387.3
1 .89
16,4
1975
FTP
6.50
66.7
387.4
1.91
17,3
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5.65
58. 1
397.9
1 .95
17.5
103
70 BUIC ELEC 455
COLD
trans
6.77
126.9
750.7
6.18
9.1
COLD
STAB
6,27
87,8
742,0
5.49
9,9
IHCL
5333PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,48
51.9
659,5
8,09
1 1,8
IHCG
540PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
6,19
87,2
738,5
5.79
9,9
ICOL
5,5 * CO
ICOG
5,0 * CO
1972
FTP
6,51
106,8
746,2
5,83
9,5
1975
FTP
5,88
86.0
720,9
6,36
10,1
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFtT
START
5.36
70.1
700.0
6,91
10,7
104
70 CHEV CHEV 250
COLD
TRANS
7.09
83.9
556.3
3.41
12.5
COLD
STAB
2.44
37.7
597.1
2.20
13.4
IHCL
2753PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.63
23.7
533.8
3.02
15.3
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.97
37.7
584,0
2.25
13.6
ICOL
3.0 5! CO
ICOG
2.4 * CO
1972
FTP
4.70
60.2
577.2
2.79
12.9
1975
FTP
3.46
43.5
571 .0
2.68
13.6
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.80
30.9
559.5
2.62
14,4
FI.IEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON j HYDROGEN RATIO
iyr>
-------
APPFNOIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OK FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.--..I
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER mile
C02
NOXC
MPG
V UFL
ECUN
105
70 CHEV CAMA 507
COLD
TRANS
6.66
50.0
647.8
5.4U
11.9
COLD
stab
5,16
44. 1
656.3
4.2U
12.0
IHCL
S031PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.65
33.2
581.3
5.57
13.7
IHCG
400PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
6.57
51.8
625.8
3.99
12.2
ICOL
3.9 * CO
ICOG
2.8 % CO
1972
FTP
5.69
47.0
652.2
4.82
11.9
1975
FTP
5.33
42.3
633.7
4.86
12.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.6a
<12.8
604. 1
4.76
12.9
NONE
HFET
106
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
4.92
57.9
752.3
5.30
10.3
COLD
STAB
3.15
49.0
815.6
4.37
9.8
IHCL
3084PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
2.60
28.9
687.7
5,62
12.0
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.39
48.4
804.4
4.39
10.0
ICOL
3.9 X CO
ICOG
3.2 * CO
1972
FTP
4.02
53.3
784.8
4.82
10.1
1975
FTP
3.37
45.3
766.9
4.91
10.5
flTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.01
38.9
747.6
4.99
10.8
107
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
7.33
102.2
620. 1
4.15
11.0
COLD
STAB
4.14
83.8
663.2
3.33
1 1.0
IHCL
3371 PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.86
59.7
577.5
4.68
13.0
IHCG
370PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.88
79.9
647.6
3.20
11.3
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
a.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5,69
92.8
642.5
3.73
11.0
1975
FTP
4.73
81,0
630,5
3,88
U.S
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.87
70.0
613.5
3.92
12.1
1 oe
70 CHEV HELA 350
COLD
trans
5,89
103.0
753. 7
4.72
9.5
COLD
STAB
3,12
54.8
796.3
3.79
9.9
IHCL
2407PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.98
46.4
675.7
4.78
11.7
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.98
48,7
783,2
3,60
10,2
ICOL
2.4 X CO
ICOG
2,1 X CO
1972
FTP
4.47
78.2
775.6
4.24
9.7
1975
FTP
3,66
62.6
754.0
4.26
10.3
OTHER
tests:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.98
47,6
730,9
4.17
10.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A ltl.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
1 y t>
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING Of- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
»ER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
109
70 CHEV STAw 400
COLD
TRANS
5,05
102,2
906,4
6,04
8,2
COLD
stab
1.94
30,9
950.7
4,66
8,8
IHCL
1590PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,61
29,9
812,8
6.12
10,2
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
2,21
36,«
919.8
4,27
9.0
ICOL
0,1 X CO
I COG
1,3 X CO
1972
FTP
3,46
65,6
929, 1
5,33
8.5
1975
FTP
2,84
45,5
903,1
5,35
9,0
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2,50
33,3
867,7
5,17
9,6
NONE
HFET
110
70 OODG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
5,56
67,7
617,3
4.89
12.0
COLD
STAB
2.79
44,6
668,2
3,50
11.9
IHCL
2113PPM CARHUN
HOT
TRANS
2,44
26,7
580,5
5,79
14.1
IHCG
370PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.73
45,6
653, 1
3,86
12.1
ICOL
2,3 X CO
ICOG
2,3 X CO
1972
FTP
«.13
55,9
643,4
4,18
1 1 • 9
1975
FTP
3,27
44,5
633,2
4,43
12,4
OTHER
TESTSI
HOT
START
2,59
36,4
617,8
4,80
i i.o
NONE
HFET
111
70 FQRD HAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
4,42
34,9
429,3
8,79
17,8
COLD
STAB
2,67
36,2
446.7
6,10
17,3
IHCL
2515PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,66
21,6
383,3
6.59
20,8
IHCG
247PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,43
35,3
430,2
«.73
18,0
ICOL
3,6 X CO
ICOG
3,4 X CO
1972
ftp
3,52
35,6
438,2
7,41
17,6
1975
FTP
3,03
31,9
425,5
6,80
IB,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,54
28.6
407 ,4
5,64
19,3
NONE
HFET
112
70 FORD FAIR 302
COLD
TRANS
11,82
90,8
659,6
6,82
10,6
COLD
STAB
7,27
82,4
704 ,3
4.71
10,4
IHCL
2012PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,47
59,9
573, 1
5.93
12,9
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,38
79,8
685,7
«.37
10,7
ICOL
3,4 X CO
ICOG
2,5 X CO
1972
FTP
9,49
66,5
682,5
5.74
10,5
1975
ftp
8,00
77.9
658,6
5.49
11,0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
6,42
70,1
630,9
5.13
11.7
NONE HFET
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
19 7
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -----GRAMS PEW MILE----- FUEL
NO. YR HAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NnxC F CON
1 1 3
70 FORD CIJST 351
COLD
TW ANS
8. 06
145.3
668.0
3.98
9.6
COLD
stab
2.52
23.0
829. 0
4.81
10.2
I HC L
812PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,77
22.a
669,9
6.09
12. u
IHCG
90PP* HEXANE
HOT
stab
?. 38
22.0
802,6
",61
10.5
IC n l
0.1 X CO
rcnG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
82.5
750 ,9
9.9
19 75
FTP
3.75
08. a
751,3
o ,99
10,6
OTHER
TESTS?
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.57
22.2
738,0
5,33
n .4
1 la
70 FORD MUST 351
COLD
TRAMS
7.49
83.4
698,3
6,77
10.0
COLD
stab
6,21
97.7
669, 3
5.28
10,5
IHCL
U226PPM CARHON
HOT
TRAMS
5.23
54.9
603,2
7, 1 0
12,6
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.8a
103.8
645,2
4,79
10.7
ICOL
6,2 X CO
ICOG
a,9 X CD
1972
FTP
6,64
90.7
683, u
6.0 0
10.S
1975
FTP
6,21
82.8
657 ,0
6,10
n.o
OTHER
TESTS!
nOnE
HOT
HFET
STAPT
S.55
80,0
624,7
5.92
11.6
1 15
70 FORD STAIn 390
COLD
TRA^S
7.27
104,1
685. 3
6 . 8U
10.2
COLD
STAR
3.01
?6, 3
725,5
6.43
11.4
IHCL
2310PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.77
27.a
629, 7
9.31
13.0
IHCG
UOOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.34
42,5
891,1
6.32
11.6
ICOL
0,6 X CO
ICOG
0,5 X CO
1972
F TP
5,09
64,2
706 ,0
6.63
10,8
1975
FTP
4.1 1
a?, 9
690,5
7.32
11.5
OTHER
TESTS!
NflNf-
HOT
HF{- T
START
3.55
35. 1
66 1 . 2
7.78
12.2
1 16
70 MFRC HARD 429
COLD
TRANS
8,90
143.4
785,7
1 1 .52
8,5
COLD
stab
5.1 1
89. a
799,6
9,32
9.3
IHCL
U588PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.23
60,0
643, 3
11.53
11,8
IHCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
4,97
107.2
717,6
7.52
9.8
ICOL
6.5 X CD
I COG
5.1 X Cn
1972
FTP
6,97
115.7
/ 92,8
10,39
6.9
1975
FTP
5.90
92.6
753 ,3
10,39
9.7
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
ST AWT
5. 10
84,3
68 1 , 0
9,07
10.7
FUEL f-CHNflMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON!HYDROGEN RATIO
1 V.-,
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH ..---GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NU,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
117
70 (1LDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
5.91
106.5
791 .6
4.24
9.1
COLD
STAB
2.99
62.8
812.5
3.69
9.6
IHCL
1965PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.22
53.4
691 .7
4.33
11.3
IHCG
185PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.95
61.2
769.2
3.09
10.1
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
1.8 * CO
1972
FTP
4.41
84.1
802,3
3,96
9.4
1975
FTP
3.66
69.a
774 .6
3.98
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.08
57.4
731 .5
3.69
10.7
NONE
HFET
118
70 OLDS DETL 455
COLD
TRANS
4,70
93.1
673.4
5.18
10.6
COLD
STAB
3.83
80.3
710.5
4.04
10,5
IHCL
1715PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.05
46.8
622.0
5.64
12.6
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.79
80.1
709.0
4.06
10.5
ICOL
2.2 * en
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
86,5
692,5
4.60
10,5
1975
FTP
3.80
73.7
678.2
4.72
11.0
OTHER
TESTS J
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.43
63.9
666,6
4.83
11.4
119
70 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
5.17
87,7
629,0
4.11
11,3
COLD
STAB
2.00
14.8
695.6
3.88
12.2
IHCL
1 106PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.88
20.6
592.4
5.03
14.1
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1 .65
12.3
655.6
4.21
1 3.0
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
0.3 X CO
1972
FTP
3.54
50.3
663.2
3.99
1 1.8
1975
FTP
2,63
31.7
653.0
4.25
12.5
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HUT
HFET
START
1.76
16.3
624.9
4.61
13.5
120
70 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
6.04
76.0
636.4
7.92
11.5
COLD
STAB
3.92
54.8
644.6
10.03
11.9
IHCL
2908PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.63
39.9
574.3
9.63
13,7
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.67
45.0
647. 3
9.45
12.2
ICOL
2.5 X CO
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
4.95
65.1
640.6
9.00
11.7
1975
ftp
4,28
55,1
623.4
9.48
12.3
OTHER
TESTS t
NONE
HOT
HFET
start
3.65
42.5
611.8
9.54
12,9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
19 v
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING (IF FEDERAL. TEST PROCEDURF RESULTS
(IN INDIVIDUAL VFHICLFS IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPQ
FUF.L
ECON
12 1
70 PONT FIRE 350
COLD
trans
5.5,?
57.7
705.3
5.87
10,9
COLD
STAB
a.53
39.2
691.8
5.98
11.6
IHCL
2364PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.75
30.0
595.1
6.59
13.6
I Hct;
285PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.48
37.2
665.6
5.74
12.0
ICOL
0.9 X CO
I cor,
0.9 X CO
1972
F TP
5.01
48.2
698.a
5.93
1 1.2
1975
FTP
4,52
40.5
667. 8
6.13
1 1.9
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4. 12
33.7
631 .2
6,16
12.7
NONE
HFET
122
70 PONT CATA 400
COLD
TRANS
6.13
96.7
938. 1
6.05
8.0
COLD
STAB
6.05
124.4
864,5
5.08
8.2
IHCL
7647PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a.55
7U.8
769. 3
6.26
9.8
IHCG
580PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.98
118.3
835.2
5.19
8.5
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
5.6 X CO
1972
FTP
7,06
110.9
900.3
5.55
8.1
1975
FTP
6,07
104.8
853.5
5,61
8.6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5.29
97.2
803.1
5.71
9.1
125
70 TOYO STAfc 116
COLD
TRAnS
3.83
36.0
458.5
11.61
16.8
COLD
STAB
3.96
58.4
429.4
10.03
16.6
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
1 1 .96
44.5
441.6
12.14
16.2
IHCT,
810PPM HEXANF.
HUT
STAB
14,<16
58.8
442,7
8.86
15,3
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
5.3 X CO
1972
FTP
3,90
47.5
443.6
10,80
16.7
1975
FTP
6.15
49.8
438.8
1 0 ,95
16,5
UTHFR
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
13.24
51 .9
442.2
10.46
15.7
124
70 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
5.05
52.2
377. 1
5.02
18.7
COLD
STAB
4.97
53.5
376.S
4.2?
18.6
IHCL
2918PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
«.33
47.6
327,0
4.45
21.4
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
4.96
48.9
422.8
a.21
17.2
ICOL
2.2 X CO
ICOG
2.9 X CO
1972
F TP
5,01
52.9
376,8
4.61
18,7
1975
F TP
4.81
¦51.6
362,9
4,45
19.3
OTHFR
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFE- T
START
4,65
48.3
376,2
4,32
19,0
F UK L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSIJmF. A 1:1,85 C A RBON : H YDROGE N RATIil
PQi:
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH
.....grams
PER MILE
.....
FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
125
69 AMMO JAVE 290
COLD
TRANS
a.52
46.6
587.2
7.11
13.2
COLO
STAB
3.36
«3.2
572.0
4.56
13.6
IHCL
2515PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3.29
33.1
507,7
7,83
15.6
IHCG
245PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.27
41 .4
557,7
4.43
14.0
ICOL
3.7 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.93
44.9
579.u
5,80
13.4
1975)
FTP
3.58
41 . 1
557.4
6.00
14.0
OTHER
TFSTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.28
37.a
533.4
6.09
14.7
126
69 RIJIC SKYL 350
COLD
TRANS
4.00
87.8
716,0
10.94
10.2
COLD
STAB
2.98
50.6
733.3
6.60
10.8
IHCL
2163PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,36
25.7
618.3
11.07
13.3
IHCG
?1OPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.91
49.0
697,8
7.22
11.3
ICOL
2.9 X CO
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3,48
68,7
724.9
8.72
10.5
1975
FTP
3,02
51,5
697.8
8,75
11.3
OTHER
TFSTSJ
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2,64
37,6
659.1
9.09
12.2
127
69 CHEV CAMA 250
COLD
TRANS
6,81
106,7
582,5
8.30
11,5
COLD
STAB
2,75
30,3
633,5
7.77
12,9
IHCL
2076PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,78
15,0
558, 1
9.52
15,0
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,56
24,9
633,9
7.79
13,0
ICOL
1,4 X CO
ICOG
0,9 X CO
1972
FTP
4,73
67,5
608,7
8.03
12.2
1975
FTP
3,61
42,0
601,9
8.37
13.1
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2,67
20,0
597,0
8,64
13.9
128
69 CHEV STAW 307
COLD
TRANS
9,66
142,5
574.5
5.36
10.7
COLD
STAB
7,08
92,0
585.3
5.62
11.8
IHCL
3340PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6,33
121 ,0
501 .9
4.45
12.5
IHCG
51OPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
7,37
145.3
537, 1
2.86
11.3
ICOL
3,9 X CO
ICOG
4,3 X CO
1972
FTP
8,34
117.0
580.0
5.50
11.2
1975
FTP
7.41
111.0
559,9
5.24
11,7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
6,87
133.5
520.0
3.63
1 1,8
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBUN:HYDROGEN RATIO
^(J1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
QM INDIVIDUAL VbHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YW MAKE MOOL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CM
PER MI LP
C02
• • m m •
NOXC
MP G
FUEL
EC ON
1?9
69 CHFV NOVA 307
cold
TRANS
7.01
86.1
5^1.7
7.15
12.7
CllLH
STAB
3.37
31.a
577 .il
6.18
13.9
IMCL
286 7PPM CAPNON
ho r
TRAnS
3.11
?4.8
514.6
8.29
15.7
I hc c;
250PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
3.78
3a.3
565. 4
6.53
11.1
I COL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
l.o % CI1
1972
FTP
5.15
58. 1
560, n
6.81
13.3
1975
FTP
a.06
41.1
552.5
7.12
la. l
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.46
29.7
540 ,6
7.39
14.8
NONE
HFET
1 30
69 CHFV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
5.7U
72. a
556.3
9.21
12.9
COLD
STAB
0.12
72.5
599. 1
7.53
12.2
IHCL
2918PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.21
38.a
522.0
1 0.25
15.0
I HC G
6?0PPM HEXANE
H(JT
STAB
a.05
70.2
592. 1
7.80
12.a
ICOL
1.3 X CO
T COG
3. 4 x cn
1972
FTP
«.Ol
72.5
578.3
8.35
12.S
1975
FTP
a.21
63,0
568, 7
8.6tt
13.0
flTHF R
TFSTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.66
54.7
557.9
8.99
13.5
131
69 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
trans
5.38
70.1
5H9.9
3.28
12.«
COLD
stab
4.57
57.0
658.6
2.32
11.*
IHCL
2717PPM CARBON
H CI T
T w a n S
4,<13
73.1
57 1.6
3.1 8
12.7
IHCG
550PPM HEXANF
HOT
stab
a.38
55.6
63
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -.--.GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
133
69 CHRY TOWN 383
COLD
TRANS
7.9b
1 17.4
72U.0
5.97
9.5
COLD
STA6
5,09
6a.7
775.2
6.78
9.9
IHCL
2767PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.13
77,0
659.6
6.70
11.1
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a. 9a
60.a
750.8
6. a7
10.3
ICUL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
2.3 * CO
1972
FTP
6.49
90,3
750,3
6.38
9.7
1975
ftp
5.70
79.1
732.a
6.59
10.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.03
68.5
706.a
6.58
10.7
A/C
HFET
13a
69 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRANS
7.29
129,a
477.a
a.94
12,6
COLD
STAB
2.ai
41.3
504.3
5.13
15,4
IHCL
23a7PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.29
ao ,5
461,7
6.42
16,7
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.33
39,9
492,9
5,18
15,8
ICOL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
2.5 X CO
1972
FTP
a.79
ea,2
491 ,2
5,04
13,9
1975
FTP
3,ao
59.5
486,8
5.45
15,0
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.31
ao.2
a77.7
5.78
16,2
135
69 FORD ST AW 302
COLD
TRANS
6. la
41.6
582,7
10.29
13.3
COLD
STAB
4.04
15.7
64a. 1
12.11
13.0
IHCL
1128PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.69
17.1
594.1
1 1.58
14.0
IHCG
170PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.72
13.1
644.2
1 1.67
13.1
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
5.06
28.3
6ia,2
1 1,23
13.2
1975
FTP
4,39
21.5
617.4
11.58
13.3
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.71
15.0
619.8
1 1.63
13.5
136
69 FORD MUST 302
COLD
TRANS
4.24
34.6
566.4
8.07
14.0
COLD
STAB
3.21
39.5
569.7
5. 06
13.8
IHCL
2052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.77
25.1
511.1
7.97
15.9
IHCG
285PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,07
33.7
561 .7
5.07
14.2
ICOL
1.6 % CO
ICOG
1.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.71
37.1
568.1
6.53
13.9
1975
ftp
3,30
34.5
552.8
6.50
14.4
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
2.92
29.5
537. 1
6.48
15.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
2Uo
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i
X 1
O 1
I
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
FCON
137
69 FflRD MUST 351
COLD
TRANS
6,76
82.3
595.3
10,06
11.9
COLD
STAR
a.66
18.«
607 . 3
P.89
13.6
1HCL
S220PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a,5a
14.8
5«2.6
13,28
15.3
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
4. 12
16.3
597,8
8.9?
13.9
1 COL
1.0 X CO
ICOG
0,6 X CO
1972
FTP
5.6ft
ao.5
601 .5
9,46
12.7
1975
FTP
5.06
30.8
586,9
10,36
13.6
OTHER
TESTS!
HflT
START
a.63
15.6
570 ,9
1 1,04
14.S
NONE
HFET
1 38
69 FORD STAW 351
COLD
TRANS
4.39
29.2
858.5
8.83
9.7
COLD
STAR
4.55
18.9
857,8
6.74
9.8
IMCL
181 1 PPM CARHON
HOT
TRANS
4.22
22. 1
711.5
9,09
11.7
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.74
22,6
818,8
6.44
10.2
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 x cn
1972
FTP
4,48
23,9
858,1
7.76
9.8
1975
FTP
4,43
21.9
817.4
7,03
10.3
OTHER
TESTSl
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3,98
22.4
766,6
7.73
10.9
1 39
69 M1RO STAW 390
COl D
TRANS
5.00
84.9
712.6
10,37
10,3
COLD
star
3.6?
41.5
715.7
9,64
11.2
IHCL
5836PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3.33
26.9
650,0
13,23
12,6
IHCG
1200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
3.97
40.1
689, 3
8,78
11.6
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
FTP
4,29
62.6
714,2
10,00
10.7
1975
FTP
3.83
46.5
696,8
10,79
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
A/C
HOT
HFET
start
3.66
33.7
670,2
10,95
12.1
140
69 MERC MONT 390
COLD
trans
5,14
86.9
753.9
6,18
9.8
COLD
star
4,32
121.1
738.2
4,92
9.4
IHCL
2465PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4,19
90,4
642.5
5,92
11.1
IHCG
300PPM HFXANE
HOT
stab
4,46
128.7
732, 1
4.77
9,4
ICHL
4.7 X CO
TCOG
3.8 X CO
1972
FTP
4.72
104.a
745.9
5.53
9.6
1975
FTP
4,45
105.4
715,0
5.46
9.9
OTHER
tests:
A/C
hot
HFET
STAUT
4.33
110.1
688 ,5
5.33
10,1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON;HYDRdGFN RATIH
2 04-
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH --..-GRAMS PEW MILE----- fuel
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
HI
69 OLDS OELT 455
COLO
TRANS
10.65
207.0
615.3
3.8U
9.1
COLD
STAB
4,47
1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING UF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE KfcSUlTS
on individual vehicles in Houston
MPC,
VFH --.--GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO,
YP MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
CU2
NOXC
ECON
145
69 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
6,83
48.7
391 .8
6.50
18. 1
COLD
STAR
5,95
60,7
420,5
a. 47
16.6
THCL
1203PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a.20
15.S
3^7.3
5.30
20.7
IHCG
125PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.62
57.2
409. 7
a.53
17.2
ICOL
2.3 * CO
1 COG
1,9 X CO
1972
FTP
6,38
5a.9
406.5
5.46
17.3
1975
FTP
5.65
53.a
39 4,2
5.12
17.9
OTHER
TESTS:
H(JT
START
a.93
50.6
379.3
4.90
18.7
NONE
HFET
146
68 AMMO RAMP 199
COLD
TRANS
1 \ .22
1 33,5
504,9
4,19
11.8
COLD
STAR
9.38
161,8
428.2
1 .94
I HCL
iJ 7 7 9 PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
7.16
125,0
374,3
2.22
15,0
IHCG
345PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
8.74
155,3
408,5
1,79
13.0
ICOL
5,9 X CO
ICOG
5.U * CG
1972
FTP
10.27
148.0
465.5
3.04
12.1
1975
FTP
9.15
145.7
429,3
2.49
12.9
OTHER
tests:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
7.97
140.6
391 ,8
2.00
13.9
147
68 RlJIC ELEC 430
COLD
TRANS
6.18
101,5
759, 1
6,06
^»5
COl D
STAB
5.39
118,5
772.8
3.93
9.1
IHCI,
3733PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,03
67,5
657,7
6,00
1 1.4
I f i'
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.35
114.2
754, 1
3.69
9.3
f COL
5.7 X LO
ICOG
5.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5.77
110.2
766. 1
4.97
9.3
1975
FTP
5.18
1 00.8
738,0
4.95
9.7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFfcT
START
4.71
91.4
707.2
4.81
10.3
me
68 CADI DEVI 472
COLD
TRANS
35. 12
87. 1
838.9
6.21
H.2
COLD
STAB
30.4a
41.6
787 .7
5.51
9.3
I HCL
7959PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
27,06
43.4
695.4
6.72
10,«
IHCG
1680PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
29,03
35,6
765,3
5,61
9.7
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
0.3 % CO
1972
FTP
32,72
63,7
812,6
5.85
A.7
1975
FTP
30.48
51,6
772,8
5.99
9.3
OTHER
tests:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
28.07
39,4
731,3
6.15
10.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RAftO
20o
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PRflCP DUKE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MHDL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
Iil9
68 CHEV CAMA 230
COLD
TRANS
30.36
271.0
*161,0
3.39
9.0
COLD
STAB
3.79
70.8
519.5
5.85
1 5.8
IHCL
3572PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.42
125,6
425,8
5.36
13.7
IHCG
420PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.41
69. 4
475,6
5.72
14.8
icol
5.5 X CO
ICOG
4.7 x en
1972
FTP
16.72
166.2
491.1
a.65
1 1.0
1975
FTP
10.fc.il
127.9
181.3
5.20
12.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.36
96. 7
U51 .4
5.54
14.2
NONE
HFET
150
68 CHEV 8ELA 307
COLD
TRANS
8.66
106,2
648. 3
8,63
10.5
COLD
STAR
7.62
78. 1
625.2
7.02
11,5
IHCL
9559PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
6.31
84.4
572.2
7.32
12,2
IHCG
760PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.63
92.6
609. 7
5.94
1 1,3
ICOL
6,5 X CO
ICOG
5.6 X CO
1972
FTP
8.13
91.8
636.5
7.80
11,0
1975
FTP
7.47
85.7
615.3
7.44
1 1.5
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
7.50
88.6
591 .5
6.61
1 1,8
151
68 CHFV BELA 3?7
COLD
TRANS
1 1,67
193,2
648,5
5.32
9.0
COLD
STAR
6,80
151,1
662,7
3.88
9,6
IHCL
34 21 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.62
99.6
612.4
6.59
11.1
IHCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
6.45
137.5
670.9
4.10
9.8
ICOL
4,9 X CO
ICOG
4.2 X CO
1972
FTP
9.17
171.5
655.8
4.58
9.3
1975
FTP
8.32
145.6
645.8
4 .94
9.9
OTHER
tests:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
7.50
119.1
642.4
5.31
10.4
152
68 CHEV MALI 30/
COLD
TRANS
7,44
82,6
590.9
8.46
11,9
COLD
STAB
6,95
23.5
584.8
6.61
13.8
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,56
26.3
536.4
8.49
14.9
IHCG
1800PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
7,29
23,4
573.0
6.22
14,0
ICOL
0.4 X CO
ICOG
0.4 X CO
1972
FTP
7,19
52,3
587.8
7.51
12,8
1975
FTP
6,67
36,7
572,7
7,52
13,6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
6,45
24.9
555,2
7.32
14,4
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN R A TIC1
207
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OP FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
fJN I Mf) I V I OU AI VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CIU
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
F CON
1 5 3
h8 CHEV CAPR 396
COLD
trans
7.71
60.6
875. 4
13.09
8.9
COLD
stab
5,16
39.2
827.2
1 1 .87
9.8
IHCL
2213PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.13
23.2
741.1
14.40
11.2
IMCG
255PPM HEXAHE
HOT
STA8
5.57
47.5
«09. i
10.<17
9.8
I COL
2.1 * CO
I COG
1.3 X CO
197?
FTP
6.56
49.6
850.7
12.46
9.3
1975
ftp
5.8a
39.2
81 i.a
12.83
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.35
35.7
776,0
12.38
10.5
NONE
HFtT
154
68 DflDG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
9,07
137.0
708,9
5.15
9.3
COLD
STAB
a.06
77.1
719.3
5.56
10,a
IHCL
2U65PP" CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.60
53.2
642.8
6.75
12.0
IHCG
260PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.30
73.6
698, 1
5.68
10.7
I COL
a.a x co
I COG
3.7 X CO
197?
FTP
6.49
106.3
714.2
5.36
9.0
1975
F TP
« .98
83.0
695.9
5.80
10.5
OTHER
TE STS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.96
63.7
671
6.20
11.3
155
6« FOWD MUST 200
CULO
trans
3.71
50.7
56b. 5
13.67
13.5
COLD
stab
2.55
32.0
548.5
1 1 .09
14.6
IHCL
1760PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.33
21.2
514,8
14.07
16.0
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.33
23.9
550.7
10.74
14.9
JCOL
0,8 X CO
ICOG
0.6 % CO
1972
FTP
3.12
41,1
557,2
12.34
14,0
1975
FTP
2.73
32.9
542.9
12.46
14.7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFfcT
STAPT
2.33
22.6
533.2
12.36
15.4
156
68 FORD MUST 289
COLD
trans
6.53
58.3
602.2
10.22
12.4
COLD
STAR
5.42
76. 1
595. 1
8.75
12.1
IHCL
5333PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
4.61
55.5
550.4
9.50
13.6
IHCG
430PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
5.34
85.9
595.1
8,05
1 1.9
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
5.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.96
67.4
598.5
9, a 7
12*3
1975
FTP
5.43
66.6
584.2
9.27
12.6
OTHER
TFSTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
4.98
71.1
573.4
8.75
12.7
FUEL economy CALCULATIONS ASSUME a 1:1.85 CARBONJHYDROGEN ratio
2 U»
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLFS IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
157
68 FORD FAIR 302
COLD
trans
4,51
72.3
707.2
5.28
10.6
t
COLD
STAB
6.03
18.2
636. 1
8.29
13,0
IHCL
5635PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4, 30
18.3
522.3
9.8a
15.7
IHCG
240PPM hexane
HOT
STAB
a.88
20,0
617.8
1 0.46
13.a
I COL
o,4 x CO
ICOG
0.4 X CO
197?
FTP
S.29
44.5
670.7
6.83
11.7
1975
FTP
5.23
29.5
619.«
8.09
13.0
UTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
'4.60
19.1
571 .4
10.16
14,4
NONF
HFET
158
68 FORD STAW 390
COLD
TRANS
8.73
171.7
745.3
4.43
8.5
COLD
STAB
4.41
79.6
HOI ,8
5,01
9,4
IHCL
2257PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.73
59.1
708. 1
6,78
10,8
IHCG
225PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.55
88.1
773. 1
4.59
9,6
ICUL
2,1 X CO
ICOG
2.4 X CO
1972
FTP
6.51
124.4
774.3
4,73
9.0
1975
FTP
5.68
93.2
764,0
5.38
9.6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5.12
74.0
741.5
5.66
10.2
159
68 MERC STAW 390
COLD
TRANS
12,68
170,0
767,7
8.31
8,3
COLD
STAR
14.81
198.3
728,6
6.24
8,2
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.68
131,9
660,5
8.35
9,9
IHCG
750PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
13,64
186.1
707, 1
6.57
8,5
I COL
6,5 X CO
ICOG
7,4 X CO
1972
FTP
13,77
184.5
747,6
7.25
0.2
1975
FTP
12,94
173,9
717,9
7.26
8,6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
11,71
159,7
684,4
7.44
9,1
160
68 OLDS CUTS 350
COLD
TRANS
8,45
115.3
697.4
7.58
9,8
COLD
STAB
5,34
87.4
703.9
5.13
10.3
IHCL
3622PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,21
54.6
640.6
7.71
12.0
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,31
91.2
699.9
4.96
10,3
ICOL
3,9 X CO
ICOG
3,6 X CO
1972
FTP
6.85
100.9
700.7
6.32
10,1
1975
FTP
5.67
84.1
685.0
6. 36
10,6
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFtT
START
4.78
73.4
671 ,0
6.30
11.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 C A RHfJN: HYDROGEN RATIO
'd09
-------
APPfcNOlX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
noxc
MPG
FUEL
ECON
161
b8 PLYM FURY 31b
COLD
trans
8,23
162. 4
394,3
1.10
13,1
COLD
STAB
4.11
43.6
573,5
4.23
13,5
IHCL
1992PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,69
44,4
505,6
5,20
15,1
IHCG
260PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
3,78
43,5
592,0
3,76
13,2
I COL
1.3 X CO
I COG
1,? * CO
1972
FTP
6,12
101,a
486,3
2.71
13,3
1975
FTP
4.86
68.7
517,2
3.84
13,9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.7a
<13.9
550,0
4.46
14.1
NONE
HFET
162
68 PONT CATA 400
COLD
TRANS
7.01
80 o 2
867,3
5.90
8.7
COLD
STAB
5,46
72.9
797,0
4,74
9.6
IHCL
6742PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,97
52.7
722,6
5,80
10.8
IHCG
495PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,56
77,6
773,6
4.26
9.7
I COL
5.5 X CO
I COG
5.0 X CO
1972
FTP
6,22
76.4
831,2
5.30
9.1
1975
FTP
5.93
68,8
791,1
5,28
9.7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5,76
65,5
748,8
5.01
10.2
163
68 VOLK SFDA 91
COLD
TRANS
9,35
108.6
317.6
3.88
17.1
COLD
STAR
12,29
153.7
378.2
3.34
13.5
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8,68
109.1
315,0
3.42
17.3
IHCG
1320PPM HEXAnE
HUT
STAB
13,84
141,3
303,8
1.91
15.6
I COL
6,5 X CO
I COG
6.2 X CO
1972
FTP
10,86
131,7
348,7
3.60
15.0
1975
FTP
10,67
131.9
348,0
3.47
15.1
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HUT
HFET
START
1 1 ,33
125.6
309.2
2.64
16.4
164
67 A HMD REBE 232
COLD
TRANS
11.47
89.9
580,7
6,25
11.7
COLD
STAB
4.60
89,3
538,5
4.61
12.8
IHCL
1519PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.07
69,8
524,5
6.44
13.6
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.28
93.5
527,7
4.44
12.9
I COL
1.2 X CI) '
ICOG
0.7 X CO
1972
FTP
7.94
89,6
559,0
5.41
12.2
1975
FTP
6.45
84.0
543,4
5.4b
12,8
OTHER
TESTS*
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5.15
81,9
52b.2
5,42
13.2
FUFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A l!l,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
^ L U
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING HP FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
a
i
X «
o fl
«
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
165
67 RUIC LESA 340
COLO
TRANS
10,26
167.2
676.2
2.72
9.1
COLD
STAB
8.09
197.2
706.7
1 .67
8.5
IHCL
7496PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.71
137.8
584.2
2.67
10.8
IHCG
440PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.56
201.9
659.4
1 .38
8.9
ICOL
6.5 X CO
I COG
7.0 X CO
1972
FTP
9.15
182.6
691 .9
2.18
8.8
1975
FTP
8.16
1 74.a
666.4
2.1 7
9.2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
7.15
170.7
622.8
2.01
9.7
ndne
HFET
166
67 CADI DEVI 429
COLD
trans
9,86
150.2
895.0
4.45
'.6
COLD
STAB
6.16
120.4
833.4
3.60
8.5
I HCL
2817PPM CARBON
HOT
Trans
6,62
108.3
780.5
4.04
9.1
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.68
103.0
839.1
4.02
».7
ICOL
3.5 X CO
ICOG
3.0 X CO
1972
FTP
7.96
134.9
863.4
4.01
8.1
1975
FTP
7.06
123.2
831.6
3.90
8.5
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
6.13
105.5
810.6
4.03
8.9
167
67 CHEV CHEL 250
COLD
TRANS
12.10
120.2
487.6
6,10
12.«
COLD
STAB
9.58
99,3
504.9
5,02
12.8
I HCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8,21
72.0
449.3
6.66
15.1
IHCG
450PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10.69
107.9
496.2
5.18
12.7
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
5.0 X CO
1972
FTP
10,81
109.5
496.5
5.54
12.6
1975
FTP
9.73
96, 1
485,8
5,70
13.3
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFfc T
START
9,48
90,4
473.3
5.90
13.7
168
67 CHEV IMPA 283
COLD
TRANS
13.30
109,6
641 ,8
6.37
10,4
COLD
STAB
12,72
67.7
600,3
5.48
11.9
I HCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8,48
67.5
558,6
6.63
12,8
IHCG
1350PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
11.29
63,0
578,9
5,20
12.4
ICOL
0,4 X CO
ICOG
0.3 X CO
1972
FTP
13.00
88.1
620.5
5.91
11.1
1975
FTP
11,67
76.4
597.4
5,98
11.8
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
9,93
65.2
569.0
5.90
12.6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1*1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
21
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING flF FEDERAL Tt ST PROCFDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1
• o
1 X
1
•
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE-
C02
m m m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
169
67 CHEV BISC 263
COLO
TRANS
20,82
193,0
590,3
1,81
9,2
COLO
STAB
19,52
ibi.b
588,6
3,65
9,1
IHCL
10052PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
12,60
126,a
519,1
5,16
U.3
IHCG
1020PPH HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1 7 .32
176,6
571 .7
3.78
9.8
ICOL
6.5 X CO
I COG
7, 1 X CO
1972
FTP
20. 15
188,7
589,1
4.21
9.3
1975
FTP
17. H7
170.3
57H.0
1.39
9.8
LlTHp R
TESTS:
HOT
START
15.03
152,2
560,7
1.60
10,5
NONE
HFET
170
67 CHEV CAPR 327
COLD
TRANS
7,21
75,6
621,1
1.72
1 1.6
COLD
STAB
6.29
88.2
578.8
2.68
12.0
IHCL
1800PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.1 2
61.0
556,2
1.51
13.1
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.81
f\J
•
P^l
cc
562,0
2.57
12.5
ICOL
3,1 X CO
ICOG
2.8 % CO
1972
FTP
6.75
82,0
601,0
3,67
1 1,8
1975
FTP
6.11
78,8
582, 1
3.62
12.2
OTHER
TESTS:
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
5.97
73.9
559,2
3.53
12.8
171 67 CHRY NE^/P 383 COLD TRANS
COLD STAR
IHCL 1911PPM CARBON HOT TRANS
IHCG 265PPM HEXANE HOT STAB
ICOL 0,5 X CO
ICOG ?.l X CO 1972 FTP
1975 FTP
OTHER TESTS! HOT START
A/C HFET
10.05
228,7
535,0
1.75
9.6
7.09
187,5
557,3
1 ,11
10.1
7.16
208.2
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN HOUSTON
MPG
VEH -"•••GRAMS PER MILE••••• FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
173
67 FORD CUST 289
COLD
TRANS
1 1 .08
1^7,5
667.3
7.25
9.5
•
COLD
STAB
1 1 .48
213.a
670.1
4.52
8,5
IHCL
7144PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
8.36
147.9
582.8
5.77
10.5
IHCG
440PPM hexane
HOT
STAB
10,41
213.6
601 .5
3.36
9,1
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6.3 * CO
1972
FTP
1 1 .28
181.3
668,6
5,85
9,0
1975
FTP
10.54
181 .a
645,3
5.44
9,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
9.43
181.6
592.a
4.53
9,8
NONE .
HFET
1 74
67 FORD MUST 289
COLD
TRANS
8,45
83.9
596.7
6.85
11.7
COLD
STAB
7,08
117.0
613,6
6,56
10,8
I HCL
4226PPM CARBUN
HOT
TRANS
5,17
59.1
542.1
7.93
13,6
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.01
127.5
586.5
5.44
1 1,0
ICOL
5,5 X CO
ICOG
4,0 X CO
1972
FTP
7.75
100.9
605.4
6.70
11.3
1975
FTP
6.84
94.0
590.2
7.00
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
6.1 1
94.2
56a.9
6.65
12.1
175
67 FORD LTD 390
COLD
TRANS
6,79
62.9
619,7
7.38
12.0
COLD
STAB
4.40
21.2
655,5
6.66
12.6
I HCL
23UUPPM CARBON
HOT
TPANS
4.84
28.4
582.5
9.67
13.8
IHCG
360PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.47
24.0
646.6
6.69
12,7
ICOL
1.0 X CO
ICOG
0,7 X CO
1972
FTP
5,56
41.5
638,1
7.01
12.5
1975
FTP
5.02
31.9
627.8
7.65
12,8
OTHER
TESTS!
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
4,65
26.2
615.4
8.14
13.2
176
67 MERC STAW 428
COLD
TRANS
11 .29
211.4
679.5
3.36
8.5
'
COLD
STAB
9.45
232.9
604.0
1 .20
8.9
I HCL
4296PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.12
194.9
548.3
1 .82
10,1
IHCG
550PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.93
265.0
569,7
0.93
8.7
ICOL
6.5 X CO
ICOG
6.3 X CO
1972
FTP
10.34
222.5
640.8
2.25
8.7
1975
F TP
9.19
217.9
604.4
1 .83
9.1
OTHER
TESTS!
A/C
HOT
HFET
START
8.05
230.9
559.2
1.36
9.4
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A l!l.fl5 CARHONlHYDROGEN RATIO
*13
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
on individual vehicles in Houston
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MflDL CIO
TEST
TYPE
.....I
HC
GRAMS
CO
PFR MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
fc CON
177
67 OLDS 98 425
COLD
TRANS
1 1 .28
93.a
690.0
7.45
10.2
COLD
STAH
1 1.90
119,9
618,a
3.59
10,5
IHCL
7607PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
9.03
86.7
595.7
6.02
11.7
IHCG
I500PPM HEXANF
HOT
stab
10.62
1 09.6
608, 4
3.42
10.9
icm
3.3 X CO
ICL1G
2.9 X CO
1972
FTP
11.60
107.0
653.2
5.^7
10.3
197b
FTP
10.98
10b. 1
627. 1
5.07
10.7
OTHEP
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
9,85
98.«
602.2
a.69
11.3
A/C
HFET
178
67 PLYM BARR 225
COLD
TRANS
10.26
122.a
421. 1
3.35
13.7
COLD
STAB
<4,30
50.2
496.6
3.51
15.1
IHCL
616PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.<10
«4,8
430.3
3.25
17.4
IHCG
70PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
3,38
41.7
509.6
3.02
15.1
ICOL
0.1 * CO
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
7.20
85.3
459.9
3.43
14.«
1975
ftp
5.30
63.8
462,4
3.41
15.3
OTHER
TESTS!
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
3.39
43.2
471.1
3.13
16.1
179
67 POMT LEMA 326
COLD
TRANS
7 ,26
9a.3
611.2
6.68
10.9
COLD
STAB
5.56
77.9
743.4
5.58
10.0
IHCL
6339PPM CARHON
HOT
TRANS
5,07
53.1
598.5
9.29
12.7
IHCG
640PP* HEXANt
HOT
STAH
5.SI
72.1
616.6
6.57
11.9
ICOL
6.0 X CO
ICOG
5,9 X CO
1972
FTP
6.39
85.9
693.7
6.11
10.5
1975
E TP
5.78
74. a
681 .8
6.8a
10.9
OTHER
TESTS: .
NONE
HOT
HFET
START
5,30
62.9
607.8
7.90
12.3
180
67 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
6.87
85.7
338.6
0.98
17.9
COLD
STAB
4.84
59.8
382. 1
4.39
18.1
IHCL
3018FPM CARBON
HOT
THANS
4,99
72.5
340. 1
5.03
18.9
I hc c;
255VPN HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.19
62.9
410.2
5.32
16.9
ICOL
3.0 X CO
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
5.82
72.4
360.9
4.68
18.0
1975
FTP
5.30
68,8
361 .a
4 .69
18.3
other
TFST8:
MQNE
HOT
HFET
START
5.09
67,6
376. 1
5,18
17.8
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A lil,?1? CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
^ JLm
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
.ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
Nfl,
YR MAKE MC1DL CID
TEST
TYPE
....-I
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
001
74 BUIC ELEC 455
COLD
TRANS
2.78
U7.0
705.0
2.71
10.2
COLD
STAB
1.51
12.5
830.7
1 .82
10.a
IHCL
1782PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.22
19.6
678.1
3.«7
12.4
IHCG
190PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.47
10.1
780.a
2.12
U.l
ICOL
1.6 * C(1
ICOG
1.6 X CO
1972
FTP
2.13
29.3
808.5
2.25
10.3
1975
FTP
1.97
21.7
778.8
2.lib
10.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1 .84
1«.7
7 i0.6
2.78
11.7
MODAL»A/C
HFET
0.60
10.7
510.6
3.45
16.8
002
74 CHEV MONT 400
COLD
TRANS
1.60
27.1
749.2
3.58
11.1
COLD
STAB
1.20
21.7
892.4
2.02
9.5
IHCL
796PPM CARBON
HOT
trams
1 .20
21.9
734.2
3.19
11.5
IHCG
80PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.12
23.4
871 .6
2,03
9.7
ICOL
0.8 X CO
I COG
0,6 X CO
1972
FTP
1.39
24.3
822,7
2,78
10,3
1975
FTP
1.28
22.9
818.6
2,67
10.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1 .16
22; 7
804.7
2.60
10,5
MODAL
HFET
0,46
15.0
631.5
4.08
13,5
003
74 CHEV 1 MP A 350
COLD
TRANS
2.3B
42.1
879.fl
6.54
9.3
COLD
STAB
1 .38
14.4
904.4
5.46
9.5
IHCL
945PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.08
38.4
787. 1
6.56
10.4
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.10
14.9
862.0
6.06
9.9
ICOL
1.1 X CO
ICOG
1.3 X CO
1972
FTP
1.87
27.9
892,4
5.99
9,4
1975
FTP
1.79
26.8
866,7
5.99
9.7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
2.09
26.4
825.5
6.30
10.2
MODAL tA/C
HFET
0.74
17.5
667,0
5.60
12.7
004
74 DODG DART 318
COLD
TRANS
6.90
88.6
631.9
2.61
11.2
COLD
STAB
4 ,04
78,0
696.3
1.89
10.7
IHCL
3633PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.13
42.4
569.8
3.29
13.7
IHCG
254PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.06
82.9
675.7
1.81
10.8
ICOL
5.2 x cn
ICOG
4.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.43
83.1
665.0
2.24
10.9
1975
FTP
4.66
70.3
647.8
2.43
11.5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4,09
63.2
624, 1
2.53
12.1
MODAL
HFET
?.41
15.6
471 .H
3.50
17.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A l:l.
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS IN DETROIT
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
Pf-P MILE
C02
• • m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
oos
7o FORD TORI 302
COLD
TRANS
9.02
79.5
70 7 .0
7.31
10. <
COLO
STAB
a, 28
72.3
660.5
«.99
1 1.0
IHCL
3882PPM CARHQN
HUT
TRANS
u, 3a
51.6
603,0
5.52
1 1 .'J
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
ST AH
a.50
71.3
71 /.5
0.07
10,5
ICOL
0.9 X CO
I cor,
3.6 X CO
1972
FTP
6.59
75.8
693 . 0
6.12
10.6
1^7b
FTP
5,29
60. 1
666 , 7
5.62
11,0
OTHER
TFSTSl
HOT
START
a, aa
61.7
700 .7
<4.78
10.9
MODAL
HFtT
1.86
10.5
561 .3
5.35
lb.2
006
70 FORD LTD 351
cold
TRANS
5.2«
73.7
893.8
a. 13
8.6
COLD
STAB
2.66
19.7
918.a
3.5a
9. 3
IHCL
liaupPM carbon
HOT
trans
a.27
27.2
790,7
0.08
10,0
IHCG
105PPM HfcXANE
HUT
S T A 0
3.03
22.0
90 7 .3
3.31
9. *
ICOL
0.1 X CD
ICOG
0.2 X CO
1972
FTP
a. 02
06.0
906.0
3.83
9.0
1975
FTP
3.75
33. 1
879.0
3.81
9.0
OTHf- R
TF STS:
HOT
START
3.60
20.5
852.5
3.68
9.6
MODAL
HF E T
2.27
20.7
603.H
3.26
13.8
007
7o OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
3.29
29.6
803.3
3.85
10.3
COLD
STAH
2.29
9.5
839 .0
3.72
10.3
IHCL
89bPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,28
13.6
710.0
0.30
12.0
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
2.36
11.8
820,8
3.55
10.0
ICOL
0.1 * CO
ICUG
0,2 X CO
1972
FTP
2. 7«
19.3
821.6
3.77
10.3
1975
FTP
2.50
10. 9
795.6
3.90
10,7
OTHER
TfcSTS:
HOT
START
2.3?
12.7
768.9
3.92
11.1
MODAL tA/C
HFET
1 .62
5.5
562.6
«.13
15.0
008
7 0 PLYM SATfc 318
COLD
TRANS
7.50
72.7
660 . 3
2.76
11.1
COLD
STA0
5.26
112.6
663,9
1.63
10.3
T HC L
7O60PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
«. 16
56.6
600 .8
3.00
12.6
IHCG
OO0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.62
96.2
603,3
1,85
10,9
ICOL
5,2 X CO
ICOG
8.0 X CO
1972
FTP
6.35
93.3
662. 1
2.28
10.7
1975
FTP
S.a2
88.8
605.6
2.0fe
11.1
OT HE R
TESTS:
HOT
START
0.39
77.9
622,6
2.60
11.7
modal,A/C
HFET
2.03
15.7
095,6
3.63
16,8
FUEL ECONOMY CAICULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.05 CARBON•HYOPOGEN RATIO
A 1 o
-------
APPENDIX C,COJMT'D
LISTING (IF FEDERAL TEST PROCFDUME RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES In DETROIT
MPG
VEH -GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
009
74 PONT BONN 400
COLD
TRANS
5.39
«2.7
88a,7
3.78
9.2
COLD
STAB
2,40
13.1
879.9
2.82
9.8
IHCL
1393PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.30
20.5
819.a
5,28
10.4
IHCG
170PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
3.07
20.6
896.0
3.30
9,5
I COL
o.a X CO
ICOG
O.a * CO
1972
FTP
3.86
27.5
882.3
3.29
9.5
1975
FTP
3.2A
21.3
86a. i
3.70
9.8
OTHER
TESTS*.
HOT
START
3.18
20.6
858.7
a,26
9.8
MODAL»A/C
HFET
3,05
26.«
614,5
a.85
13.3
010
7a VOLK 3EDA 97
COLD
TRANS
7,16
as.6
305.5
2,78
22.2
COLD
STAB
6,90
55,0
375,7
2,00
18,3
IHCL
4977PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.57
a5. 3
318,7
2,70
21,8
IHCG
390PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.6a
5a.o
380,3
1 ,96
18,5
I COL
3.3 * Cfl
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
7,03
50.a
3«1,5
2,38
20,0
1975
FTP
6.59
50.3
345.2
2.36
19,9
OTHER
TESTS J
HOT
START
5.10
a9,8
350,a
2.32
20,0
MODAL
HFET
1 .a6
15.5
284.0
3.01
28,4
Oil
73 AMMO HORN 258
COLD
trans
2.73
43.0
542.0
5.43
14.4
COLD
stab
1 .58
33.9
676.2
3.44
12.1
IHCL
1294PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.81
30.1
556.7
5.77
14.6
IHCG
UOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0.81
ia.a
720.8
4.38
11.9
1COL
1,3 * CO
ICOG
1.2 X CO
1972
FTP
2. la
38.3
610,9
4.41
13.1
1975
FTP
1 .89
34.8
615.0
4,50
13.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1,30
22.0
641.0
5.06
13.1
MODAL
HFET
0.64
5.6
430.2
6.57
20.1
012
73 BUIC LESA 350
COLD
trans
3.78
50.0
751.4
6.26
10.5
COLD
stab
2.26
34.3
722.6
3.61
11.3
IHCL
4679PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2,30
22.5
684.6
6.56
12.2
IHCG
290PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
2,26
32,8
710.7
3.93
U.5
ICOL
4.3 X CO
ICOG
a. 6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.00
41.9
736,6
4.90
10,9
1975
FTP
2,59
34.3
718.1
4,98
11.4
OTHF.R
TESTS!
HOT
START
2,28
27.8
698.0
5.21
11.9
MODAL
HFET
1.15
6.5
559.8
6.53
15.5
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBUNrHYDROGEN RATIO
217
-------
APPENDIX C » CON T'H
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.....1
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE-
C02
¦ m m m m
NC'XC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
013
73 HI 11C LIMI 455
COLD
TPANS
4.43
56.1
903.0
a.65
6.8
COLD
ST AH
3.74
64.2
8BJ. 1
2.70
8.9
IHCL
2062PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
4.20
au.7
758.9
a.51
10.5
IHCG
155PPM hexane
HOT
STAB
3.75
66.5
855.«
2.65
9.1
ICOL
3.7 X CO
ICOG
3.6 X CO
197?
FTP
4.07
60,2
892,fl
3.65
R.9
1975
F TP
a.oi
57. 1
852.8
3.61
9.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.97
55.9
808. <1
3.55
9.8
MODAL
HFET
2.03
22.0
576.3
4. 59
14,4
oia
73 CADI DEVI «72
COLD
TRANS
a,93
53.8
806.8
3.93
9.4
COLD
STAB
2.38
35.2
981 .8
a,87
8.5
IHCL
945PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,44
28.3
862.6
5.«5
9.7
IHCG
100PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAH
2.29
35.1
958.7
«.73
8.7
I COL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
FTP
3.62
aa.3
916.1
u,u\
8.9
1975
ftp
2.93
. *7.2
920.5
4,83
9.0
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
2.36
31.8
911.9
5.08
<>.2
MODAL
HFET
1.20
6.5
673,5
5.92
12,9
015
73 CAPR SEDA 122
TOLD
TRANS
a. 15
43.8
340.8
6.08
21.0
COLU
stab
3.11
23.0
373.6
5.65
21.2
IHCL
2937PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.65
18. a
312.7
6.66
25.4
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,98
21 .a
361 .0
6.1 1
22,0
ICOL
2.3 X CO
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.62
33.1
357.6
5.86
21.1
1975
F TP
3.20
26. 1
349. H
6.0?
22. 1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.82
19.9
337 .5
6.38
23.5
MODAL
HFET
0.86
3.8
256.0
1 .63
33.5
016
73 CHEV STAW 100
COLD
trans
4.98
58.7
402.0
6.73
17.4
COLD
STAB
3.22
48.6
465,6
4.37
16. 1
IHCL
253BPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.32
43.9
416. 1
4.85
17.9
IHCG
210PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.48
52.1
457.1
a.42
16.1
ICOL
3.7 X CO
•
ICOG
2.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4.OR
53.5
434,7
5.52
lb.7
1975
FTP
3.62
49.a
438,6
5.00
16.8
OTHFR
TESTS:
hot
START
3.40
48.1
437. 1
4.63
17,0
MODAL
HFET
' 1 .58
16.3
521 .4
5.53
25.2
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
<21«
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.....1
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
017
73 CHEV CAMA 250
COLD
TRANS
5.67
30.2
578.2
5,60
13.8
COLD
STA'B
2.62
6.9
591.7
4.66
14.5
IHCL
1393PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.12
11.1
495,1
5.38
17.0
IHCG
165PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,65
11.7
567.3
a.09
14.9
ICOl
0.1 X en
I COG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
a,10
18.3
585.1
S.12
14.2
1975
FTP
3.«0
13.0
562.1
5. 06
15.0
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2.88
11.4
532.2
4.72
15.9
MODAL
HFET
1 .66
9.7
373.0
5.50
22.6
010
73 CHEV CHEV 307
COLD
TRANS
4.92
56, 1
790,4
2.87
9.9
COLD
STAB
9.48
47.4
745, 1
2.31
10,4
IHCL
8«3PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.85
36,9
682.8
2,70
11.8
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.62
56, 1
756.7
2,08
10.3
ICOL
1.9 X CO
ICOG
2.2 X CO
1972
FTP
7.26
51,6
767,2
2,58
10.2
1975
FTP
6,97
46,3
737.3
2.53
10.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.27
46,7
720,7
2.38
10.9
MODAL
HFET
0.84
21,9
606, a
1 ,84
13,8
019
73 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
trans
3,03
63.2
682.2
2, 6*4
11.2
COLD
STAB
1.73
34.3
717.4
1.54
11.4
IHCL
933PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.91
22.2
615.4
2.73
13.5
IHCG
135PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
1.80
27.3
684,6
1,48
12.1
ICOL
0.8 * CO
ICOG
1.3 X CO
1972
FTP
2,36
48.4
700.3
2.08
11.3
1975
FTP
2,05
37.0
681 .8
2,10
1 1.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1.85
24.8
651.0
2,09
12.8
MODAL
HFET
0.82
5.4
511,3
2.77
17,0
020
73 CHEV CHEV 350
COLD
TRANS
2.97
27.2
780.9
4.80
10,7
COLD
STAB
2.04
18.0
781,1
2.52
10,9
IHCL
1129PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.55
18.1
654,6
4.2
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO,
YR HAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NDXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
021
73 CHEV LAGU 350
COLD
TRANS
3.86
43.0
666.9
3.19
11.9
COLD
STAB
1.63
27.7
787,6
2.09
10.6
IHCL
746PPM CARRON
HOT
trans
1,83
22.1
613.5
3,31
13,6
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.77
26.2
770 .0
2.15
10,9
ICPL
0.9 X CO
I COG
0.9 X CO
1972
FTP
2.8?
35.1
728,9
2.62
11.2
1975
FTP
2.25
29.3
714.0
2.66
11,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
1,80
24.?
693.8
2.72
12,0
MODAL
HFET
0,75
7.9
502.9
3.«3
17,1
022
73 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
TRANS
3.70
68. 1
685.9
2.56
11.0
COLD
STAB
3.43
8«.9
682.4
1 .60
10.7
IHCL
1264PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.07
56,9
596.8
2.35
12.8
IHCG
150PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,67
91,6
666, 4
1 .33
10.8
ICOL
2,7 X CO
ICOG
8,0 * CO
1972
FTP
3,56
76.7
684. 1
2.07
10.9
1975
FTP
3,39
73.6
659,4
2.01
11.-5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,38
74.7
632,5
1 .83
11.7
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1,18
25.3
496, 0
2.53
16.5
023
73 CHEV CAPR 400
COLO
trans
4.37
70.5
768.8
3.67
9.9
COLD
STAB
2.23
57.7
745.7
2.4?
10.5
IHCL
1P04PPM CARBON
HOT
trams
3.17
45.9
664,4
3.83
1 1.9
IHCG
235PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,16
54,4
737.4
2,52
10, /
ICOL
1.7 X CO
ICOG
2.2 X CO
1972
F TP
3.27
64.0
756,9
3.03
10.2
1975
FTP
2.94
57,1
728.0
3.07
10,7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
2,65
50,3
701,8
3.15
11.?
MODAL,A/C
HFET
1 .26
18.1
548,7
4.08
15.3
024
73 CHRY NtWY 400
COLD
trans
29,66
1 32.7
756.8
4.69
8.4
COLD
STAB
3.47
72.4
871 .8
2.83
8.9
IHCL
3733PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
2.47
36.6
740.7
4.86
11.0
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.30
71.8
872.9
3.03
8.9
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
4,4 X CO
1972
FTP
16,22
101,8
815.8
3.74
8.6
1975
FTP
8,67
75.1
811.4
3.78
9.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,90
54.7
808.5
3.9?
9.8
MODAL
HFET
2.37
37.4
527.6
5.1 7
14.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
0
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING (IF FEDERAL, TEST PPOCFPURE RFSULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
Nl).
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
025
73 DATS SEDA 146
COLD
TRANS
2.85
60.4
380. 1
4.61
18.3
COLD
STAB
4.86
92.0
369.3
1 .56
16.8
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.56
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF F-EDFRAL TFST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODI CID
TEST
T YPF
i
i
I 1
O 1
I
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
Cu2
• • • • m
NOXC
MPR
FUEL
ECON
029
73 FORD MAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
1,91
55.6
153.7
3,23
15.9
COLD
STAB
3.12
57,9
«88,7
2.10
15,0
IHCL
2618PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.93
36,8
106,5
3,21
18,7
IHCG
165PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAR
3.H
<19. 1
18 0,0
2.19
15,7
ICOL
1,1 X CO
ICOG
5.7 X CO
1972
FTP
a. 16
56.7
171.7
2.80
15.5
1975
FTP
3.60
51.5
158,6
2.79
16.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.01
13,1
111,2
2.81
17.0
MODAL
HFET
1 .58
6.1
331,0
1,29
25.5
030
73 FORD MUST 302
COLO
TRANS
5.55
61,6
781 ,8
1.20
9,9
COLD
STAB
1.17
53,8
777,7
3,11
10,1
I HCL
3181PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.90
37,7
688,7
1,15
11.6
IHCG
310PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1,51
50,9
751,3
3,19
10.5
ICOL
2.8 X CO
ICOG
2.7 X CO
1972
FTP
5.00
59,0
779,7
3,70
10.0
1975
FTP
1,81
51,6
753.9
3,71
10.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1.72
11.5
722.1
3,81
11.0
MODAL
HFET
2,68
20.3
567.7
1.19
H.6
031
73 FORD LTD 351
COLD
TRANS
1.12
18,2
755,5
5.32
10,5
COLD
STAB
?, 68
13,1
788,8
1,16
10,9
I HCL
1201PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.38
16,1
671 ,2
1,89
12.5
IHCG
115PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.68
11.6
759,2
1,28
11.3
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.53
30,2
772,6
1.73
10,7
1975
FTP
3,21
21,3
719,2
1,61
11.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.0?
13,8
716,1
1,58
1 1 .9
MODAL
HFe T
2.06
9,7
501, 1
1.51
16,9
03?
73 FORD MUST 351
COLD
TRANS
7,10
66,8
596, 1
2,38
12.3
COLO
STAB
1,65
100,2
620,0
1 .72
1 1.2
I HCL
9916PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3,51
52,1
561,3
2.59
13.5
IHCG
1300PPM Hf-XANf
HOT
STAB
«.12
81.1
628,8
2.02
11.5
ICOL
5,2 * CO
ICOG
6,0 * ro
1972
FTP
5,98
83,9
608,1
2.01
11.7
1975
FTP
1.91
79,9
599,6
2.10
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.81
68.8
597,1
2.30
12.1
MODAL » A/C
HFET
2,32
17,7
500,3
2.66
16,6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,65 CARHUN:HYDROGEN RATIO
^ '
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
MPG
VEH -.--.GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NtlXC
ECON
033
73 FORD STAW 400
COLD
TRANS
5,46
65.4
897 .4
4.58
8.7
COLD
STAB
3.20
912.3
2.62
8.9
IHCL
5177PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.66
38.2
793.2
4.25
10.3
IHCG
780PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.44
39.2
873.9
2.71
9.4
ICOL
0.4 * CO
ICOG
0.6 * CO
1972
FTP
4.30
56.0
905.1
3.57
8.8
1975
FTP
3.80
48.5
876.2
3.48
9.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.54
38.7
834.7
3.46
9.8
MODAL,LOADED
HFFT
1.76
15.2
628.3
6.29
13.5
034
73 FORD LTD 400
COLD
TRANS
a .53
54.1
803.4
4.33
9.8
COLD
STAB
4.07
83.6
768,9
2.98
9.7
IHCL
6371 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.49
46.7
695.4
4.14
11.3
IHCG
415PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.41
88.2
752.5
3.39
9.8
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
7.8 X CO
1972
FTP
4,29
69.2
785,7
3,64
9.8
1975
FTP
4.28
67.2
755.7
3.58
10.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.45
68.0
724,7
3.76
10.5
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1 .98
10.5
569.9
a.32
15.0
035
73 MA ZD 8EDA 70
COLD
TRANS
4.90
27.9
518.8
1 .62
15.4
cold
STAB
2.17
23,4
754.5
1.36
11.1
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.01
34.9
522.2
2.33
15.1
IHCG
2000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1.88
22.5
736.1
1 .56
11.4
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICCIG
4.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3,50
25,6
639,8
1.49
12.8
1975
FTP
3.25
27.5
640.7
1 .68
12.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.91
28.5
632.0
1 .94
12.9
MODAL
HFET
0.65
4.3
417.6
1 .89
20.8
036
73 MERC MARQ 429
COLD
TRANS
4.58
78.3
896.6
6.62
8.6
COLD
STAB
3.91
115,9
857. U
2.90
8.4
IHCL
2986PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.29
74.3
716.7
5.09
10,5
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.41
95.8
871.5
3.36
8,6
ICOL
4.2 X CD
ICOG
4.6 X CO
1972
FTP
4.23
97.6
876,5
1.71
8.5
1975
FTP
4.15
96.5
826,6
4,29
9.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.84
85.4
796. 1
4.20
9.4
MODAL,A/C
HFET
2.60
23.1
588.7
6.56
14.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CAKBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
2-0
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE: RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKF MOOL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
037
73 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
3.62
29.9
801.1
1.18
10.3
COL D
stab
3.22
26.5
792.9
3.58
10.5
THCL
1622PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
2.90
20. 3
666 .5
4.39
12.5
1HCG
155PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.31
26.2
775. 1
3.«7
10.7
ICnL
0.6 x en
ICOG
0.6 X CO
1972
FTP
3.H
20.2
79b.a
1. 02
10,a
1975
FTP
3.22
25.5
760.7
3.99
10.9
UTHt'H
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.13
23.a
723.2
3.92
1 1.5
MODAL
HFET
2.25
9.5
505.2
5.07
16,8
038
73 OLDS 9B <155
COLD
TRANS
3.68
33.1
815. i
10.03
10.1
COLD
STAB
«. 15
31.2
787.0
8, ft 0
10.1
IHCL
9916PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.73
1«. 1
716.1
10.87
11.8
IHCG
1U00PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
u,io
20.5
778,0
8,59
10,8
ICOL
2.5 X CO
ICOG
2.9 * CO
1972
FTP
3.92
33.7
800 .8
9.10
10.2
1975
FTP
3.93
28. 1
773.3
9.63
10.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
a,07
17. i
748,0
9,70
11.3
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1,56
«.i
597,9
1 1 .40
11.6
039
73 PLY* FURY 31«
CULD
TRANS
5.03
71.0
650.1
8.05
11.1
COLD
STAB
3.73
58.9
663,7
6.12
1 1.6
IHCL
22R9PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.99
39.6
593.2
7.99
13.3
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.58
58. 1
665. 1
6.13
11.6
ICML
3.1 X CO
ICOG
2.5 * CO
1972
FTP
U.36
61.8
657.2
7.22
11.5
1975
FTP
3.80
56. 1
611.1
7.20
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,30
19. 1
630,1
7.01
12.1
MODAL
HFET
2.20
22.2
166.9
B.Bfl
17,1
010
73 PLYM FURY 360
COLD
TRANS
7.18
8 8.2
718,8
1.60
9,7
COLD
STAB
7.00
119.7
650.2
1.03
10,3
IHCL
R721 PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.22
82.1
609,1
1.97
11.7
IHCG
715PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.58
130.0
651,1
1.01
10,1
ICOL
5.2 X C(1
ICOG
7.9 X CO
1972
FTP
7.21
101.1
698,2
4.31
10.0
1975
F TP
6.61
102.8
659.5
1.11
10.5
OTHER
TFSTS t
HOT
START
6.13
106.9
632.5
a.18
10,8
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
3.66
52.8
191 .9
1.82
15.1
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
flN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL C11)
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILF
CO?
m m m mm
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
04 1
73 PONT VENT 350
COLD
trans
9. 1«
ea.5
750. a
3.86
9.7
COLD
STAR
5.70
71.5
738.7
3.37
10.2
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.09
48.5
654.5
5.11
11.9
IHCG
560PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.22
78.2
733.8
3.66
10.1
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
5.8 * CO
197?
ftp
7.37
77,8
744,4
3.61
10.0
1975
FTP
6.25
67.8
717.8
3.96
10.5
OTHER
TFSTS!
HOT
START
5.67
63,8
695,2
4.37
10.9
MODAL
HFET
3.08
16.0
566.3
6.13
la.e
042
73 PONT GRNA 400
COLD
TRANS
4,83
53,5
757,6
3.77
10,4
COLD
STAB
4.72
55,0
733,1
3.36
10.6
IHCL
3285PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.57
35.4
652.9
7.18
12.3
IHCG
290PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
5.23
62.0
710,5
3,29
10,8
ICOL
3.7 X CO
ICOG
4,0 X CO
1972
FTP
4.77
51.2
745.0
3.56
10.5
1975
FTP
4.70
49.2
716.0
4.50
11.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
a.91
49. 1
682.4
5,18
11.5
MODAL# A/C
HFET
2.51
11.4
559.9
8.90
15.1
043
73 TOYO CELI 120
COLD
TRANS
3,41
61.6
383.8
5.00
18.1
COLD
STAB
3.39
69.0
419.0
3.59
16.5
IHCL
6670PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,11
33,5
360,0
5.78
21.0
IHCG
460PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.28
68.6
408.3
3.51
16.9
ICOL
2.5 X CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
3.40
65.4
401 .9
4.27
17.2
1975
FTP
3.32
57.6
395,3
4.49
17.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.20
51.5
384.8
4.62
18.6
MODAL
HFET
1 .08
18.7
280,9
6.29
28.3
044
73 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
5.97
63.9
351.4
4.15
18.9
COLD
STAB
4.13
65.9
375.8
2.70
18.0
IHCL
2488PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.73
47,0
323,1
3,72
21.7
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,34
63,7
379,5
2,67
18,0
ICOL
2.9 X CO
ICOG
3.4 * CO
1972
FTP
5.03
64.9
364.0
3.41
18.4
1975
FTP
4.41
60.2
356.1
3.29
19.1
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4.05
55.6
352.1
3.18
19.6
MODAL
HFET
1.40
16.0
292.0
4.57
27.6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A IS 1,85 CARBONJ HYDROGEN RATIO
2-3
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDFRAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEN
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
.....I
HC
n,RAMS 1
CO
°ER MILE
CO?
NOXC
rtPG
FUFL
ECON
005
73 VOLK SEDA 103
COLD
TRANS
3,64
43.6
421 . 1
4.23
17,7
COLD
STAB
1.97
2 5,3
455.9
3.39
17,7
IHCL
424PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,18
U0,7
382. 1
3,51
19.6
IHCG
55PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1 .85
25,9
445.5
3,26
18.0
ICOL
0.1 X CO
IC OG
o.l X CO
1972
FTP
2,76
3a,2
439,0
3,80
17.7
1975
FTP
2.38
33.4
428.2
3,60
18,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,01
33,1
414.7
3.38
18,8
MODAL
HFET
1,20
14.9
312,9
3.98
26,1
046 72 HUIC LESA 350
COLD
TRANS
9.77
115,9
725,7
6.82
9.5
COLD
STAB
10,12
173,7
647, 7
4,75
9.3
I HCL 9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8,19
'96.9
609, 1
7.27
11.3
IHCG 1250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
11 .27
190.4
646,6
4.09
9.0
ICOL 5,2 * CO
ICOG 10,0 X CO
1972
FTP
9,95
145.6
685,6
5.76
9.4
1975
FTP
9,51
140.3
653,3
5.88
9.8
OTHER TESTS:
HOT
START
9,77
1 44,9
628.3
5,64
10,0
MODAL,A/C
HFET
4,07
44,7
485.3
7.33
15.6
047
72 BUIC CENT 455
COLD
TRANS
6,16
70.4
830.8
11.19
9.2
COLD
STAB
5.26
70.7
875.4
11,12
8,8
I HCL
3185PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.11
38. 9
747.5
13,61
10.8
IHCG
1 80PPM HbXAK'E
HOT
STAB
4 ,67
68.1
886.0
11 .62
8.8
ICOL
<4,4 X CO
ICOG
3,0 * CO
1972
FTP
5,70
70.5
853.9
11.15
".0
1975
FTP
5.41
61.0
830,8
1 1.83
9.4
OTHER
TF STS:
HOT
START
4,88
53.9
818,6
12. 59
9.7
MODAL
HFP T
1 .68
10.7
600.8
12.68
14.3
048
72 CHEV VfcGA 140
COLD
trans
6,19
107.6
460,6
1.15
13.7
COLD
STAB
2.77
58.9
584,3
0,79
12.9
I HCL
421 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,05
78.0
442,1
0.79
15,3
IHCG
85PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.52
65.3
608.8
0,56
12.3
ICOL
0.7 * CO
ICOG
0.6 X CO
1972
FTP
4.43
82.6
524. 1
0.97
13.3
1975
FTP
«.12
74,4
518,9
0,87
13,7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.27
71.5
527.6
0 .68
13.6
MODAL
HFtT
0,91
40,7
402.4
0.40
18.9
FUEL EfONQMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1!1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING Of- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
flN I MO I VI DUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
.....I
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPQ
FUEL
ECON
049
72 CHEV NOVA 250
COLD
TRANS
2,94
28.2
726.0
a.oo
11.«
COLD
STAB
0.85
21.5
703.0
2.61
12,0
IHCL
U081PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.39
16.6
606.6
3.59
13.9
IHCG
395PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0,99
24.7
676.1
2.81
12.a
ICOL
5.2 * CO
I COG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
1.87
24.8
714,2
3.28
11.7
1975
FTP
1.71
21.5
681 .1
3.17
12.3
OTHER
TF-STSJ
HOT
START
1 .67
20,8
642.3
3.19
13,0
MODAL
HFET
0.32
«.l
4 70.2
3.33
18.6
050
72 CHEV MALI 307
COLD
TRANS
3.23
39,1
639.6
5.73
12.5
COLD
STAB
3.42
39.5
640 .3
4.23
12.4
IHCL
4281 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.85
22.3
556.6
6.10
14,8
IHCG
280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.35
39.9
617.0
4.15
12.9
ICOL
a.3 x en
ICOG
3.0 X CO
1972
FTP
3.33
39,3
6«0.0
a.96
12.5
1975
FTP
3.22
34.6
616.9
5,06
13.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,10
31.3
587,6
5,10
13,7
MODAL
HFET
2.22
15.0
418.1
6.61
19.8
051
72 CHEV STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
3.13
51.9
781 .8
7.92
10.2
COLD
STAB
2.78
31.7
842,5
5.43
9.8
IHCL
2190PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.42
26.5
726,2
8,89
11.4
IHCG
320PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
2.71
31.5
819,1
5.27
10,1
ICOL
2.1 X CO
ICOG
2.4 X CO
1972
FTP
2.95
41.5
813,0
6.64
10.0
1975
FTP
3,03
34.5
797,6
6.91
10.3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.06
29.1
773,9
7.03
10.7
MODAL» A/C
HFET
1 .72
16,3
541 ,2
9.34
15,5
052 72 CHfV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
5.39
56,6
752.6
5.43
10,3
COLD
STAB
2.64
40,5
784,5
3.36
10,4
IHCL 2488PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.30
37.9
680,5
5.52
11.9
IHCG 280PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.80
49,5
755.5
3,36
10.5
ICOL 2.7 X CO
ICOG 3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
3.98
48.4
769.0
4.37
10.3
1975
FTP
3,12
43.2
749,0
4,39
10,7
OTHER TESTS:
HOT
START
2,56
43,9
719,0
4,41
11.1
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1.66
16. 1
521 ,4
6,20
16,1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
85 CARBON.'HYDROGf N
RATIO
HP 7
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DETROIT
MPG
VEH ,----r,RAMS PER MILE-- — - FUEL
NO.
YP MAKE MQDL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
053
7 2 CHfcV S T A d 350
COLD
TRANS
8,68
08.5
650. 3
6,31
11,8
COLD
STAB
5.53
80.5
607. 3
5.60
11.8
IHCL
3584PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.50
36.0
575.7
7.16
13.8
IHCG
¦ 280PPM HEXANf
HOT
STAB
it.97
74.1
597.3
5,59
12.2
ICOL
5.2 X CO
I COG
3.8 % CO
1972
FTP
7.06
64.9
628.2
5,95
11,8
1975
FTP
5.63
61 .a
607,5
6,18
12,3
OTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
4,25
55.5
586.8
6,36
12,9
modal
HFET
1 .25
7.«
477,8
6,21
18,0
054
72 CHEV CAPR 400
COLD
trans
5,46
1 19.8
740, 1
6,18
9.4
COLD
STAB
2,83
56.7
823.4
3.91
9.6
IHCL
P787PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
3,03
44.3
687,8
6,63
1 1.6
IHCG
245PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,79
57,5
778.5
3.87
10.1
ICOL
2.8 * CO
TCOG
2.5 X CO
1972
FTP
4.11
87,4
782.8
5.02
9.5
1975
FTP
3,4«
66,5
768,3
5,14
10,0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.91
51.1
734.4
5.21
10,8
MODAL,LOADED
HF6 T
1 .98
24,6
529,4
8,24
15,5
055
72 DATS SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
«,2B
39.8
378,2
6.72
19,5
COLD
STAR
4.08
40.3
362,4
«.12
20,2
IHCL
7566PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.01
29.8
328, 1
6.54
23,1
THCG
495PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.68
39.0
360,8
4.21
20,5
ICOL
S.2 X CO
ICOG
5,1 * CO
1972
FTP
a.17
40.1
370, I
5.38
19,9
1975
FTP
3.82
37,3
356,2
5.33
20.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
start
3.35
34.5
344.9
5.34
21.7
MODAL
HFET
1.34
5.2
296.9
8.03
28.7
056
72 DODG DART 318
COLD
TRANS
4,12
44,2
596,5
5,84
13,1
COLD
STAB
3,03
27,5
631, 1
5,06
13,0
IHCL
2 1 40PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2,79
19,8
537,8
6,49
15.4
IHCG
260PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.04
30.4
633.4
5.5?
12.8
ICOL
3,1 * CO
ICOG
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
3,56
35,6
614,3
5.44
13.0
1975
FTP
3.19
28,9
598,0
5.62
13,6
OTHFR
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.92
25.2
586,9
5.99
14,0
MODAL
HFET
1 .80
15.1
416.2
5.13
19.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.05 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
2..ti
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YP MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
• o
1 I
i
i
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
057
72 DODG POLA 360
COLD
TRANS
6.68
89.6
661.7
8.36
10.8
COLD
STAB
a. 76
85. 1
635.5
6.7a
11.3
IHCL
3185PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a.26
59.8
606.2
9.01
12. 4
IHCG
250PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
a.57
82.7
589.9
5.93
12.1
ICOL
4.2 * CO
I COG
4.4 X CO
1972
FTP
5.69
87.3
648.3
7.53
11.0
1975
FTP
5.02
79.0
632.9
7.71
11.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.42
71.5
597.8
7.«3
12.3
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
2.82
30.6
<481,1
7.99
16.5
058
72 FORD PINT 122
COLD
TRANS
4. 83
33.0
382.7
2.88
19.7
COLD
STAB
1.59
21.8
462.4
2.61
17.7
I HCL
1«93PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.57
19.0
393,9
3.69
20.7
IHCG
100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.04
21.5
488,6
2.95
16.8
ICOL
1.9 X CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
FTP
3.17
27.3
423.7
2.74
18,6
1975
FTP
2.26
23.4
426.8
2.96
18.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1.61
20.3
442.5
3.31
18.5
MODAL
HFET
0.39
3.3
326.4
3.70
26.7
059
72 FORD TORI 302
COLD
TRANS
4.57
58.8
716.2
6.77
10. fl
COLD
STAB
3.01
33.8
771,8
3.99
10.6
I HCL
1354PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.32
25.7
627,5
7.03
13.1
IHCG
165PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.77
29.0
750,4
3.97
11.0
ICOL
0.1 * CO
ICOG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
3.77
46.0
744,7
5.34
10.7
1975
FTP
3.42
36.8
720, 1
5.42
11.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.04
27.4
690.6
5.46
11.9
MODAL
HFET
2.20
17.8
474.6
7.53
17.4
060
72 FORD LTD 351
COLD
TRANS
49.32
270,7
549,8
I ,86
7.8
COLD
STAB
36. 11
201.2
590.9
1.36
8.7
I HCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
32.47
156,3
527. 1
2,32
10.1
IHCG
1900PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
36.25
200,9
604.8
1 .46
8.6
ICOL
4.4 X CO
ICOG
4,6 * CO
1972
FTP
42,54
235,0
570.9
1.60
8.3
1975
FTP
37,87
203,3
564,6
1.73
8,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
34.41
179,2
567,0
1 .88
9.3
modal
HFET
24,95
121,7
395,9
2.07
13.3
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBQN:HYDROGEN RATIO
2 9
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING flF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
—-.-GRAMS I
HC CO
JEK MILE
C02
• m • m m
NDXC
MPG
FUFL
FCON
061
72 FORD GALA 351
COLD
TRANS
1,66
77,6
690. 1
5,97
10,7
COLD
STAB
3.11
91.8
717.3
3,01
10,1
IHCL
796UPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
a, OB
66,6
608.5
6.38
12.2
IHCG
1O20PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.10
96.1
683.2
2.A5
10.5
I COL
1,0 X CO
T COG
3.8 * CO
1972
FTP
a.03
86.1
701. 1
a.17
i o .a
1975
FTP
3.87
83,1
681 .1
1.58
10.8
OTHER
TFSTSJ
HOT
START
1 .09
81,9
616,9
4.57
11.3
MODAL,A/C
HFET
2.51
16,6
113,8
5.52
16.9
062
72 FORD STAW U00
COLD
TRANS
7.63
131.3
786.9
6.51
8.7
COLD
STAB
3.26
67,5
823, 1
6,69
9.1
IHCL
3U2aPPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.09
16.8
705.0
8,27
11.3
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.01
61 . 1
789.9
6.13
9.9
I COL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
6.2 * CO
1972
ftp
5.39
98.5
805.5
6.62
9.1
1975
FTP
1.13
75.1
782.7
7.1 0
9.7
MTHfc R
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.07
51.2
718.6
7.32
10.5
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1.66
23.7
558.0
7.10
11.8
063
72 FORD THUN U29
COLD
TRANS
6,02
33.1
673,7
7.31
H.9
COLD
STAB
1,88
29.8
700,9
1,98
11,6
IHCL
1592PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.12
16.2
637.8
8.93
13.2
IHCG
170PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
1.06
11.1
708.0
5.72
1 1.9
ICOL
1.1 X CO
ICOG
0.9 X CO
1972
FTP
5 ,11
31,5
687. 7
6,13
11.8
1975
FTP
a .63
26.7
677. 7
6.57
12.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.60
15.3
673.9
7.28
12,5
MODAL
HFET
1.73
10.6
581.1
1 1 .19
11.6
061
72 LINC CONT 160
COLD
TRANS
12,25
372.3
620.8
I.11
7.1
.
COLD
STAB
5.03
221 .7
717.1
1 .35
8.2
IHCL
2190PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.18
256,3
576,3
1 .28
8.9
IHCG
215PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
",86
220,1
708, 1
1,38
H.5
ICOL
2.9 * CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
8.51
295,0
670,2
1,23
7.6
1975
FTP
6,67
262,8
657,9
1,28
8.1
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
5,16
237.7
611.0
1.33
8.6
MODAL
HFET
1.97
211 .2
139.8
1 .18
10.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUMF
a 1:1
.85 CARBON1HYDROGEN
RATIO
2. oO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
Nn.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
0 65
72 MERC MONT 400
COLD
TRANS
3.04
69.5
768.5
7.98
10,0
COLD
STAB
3.58
45.3
716.0
6.95
11.1
IHCL
3136PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.53
31.8
698.5
10.46
11.7
IHCG
UOOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.59
38.8
724.8
7.77
11.1
I COL
2.2 X CO
ICUG
2.? * CO
1972
FTP
3.32
57.1
742.0
7.45
10.5
1975
FTP
3.45
46.6
722.5
8.14
11.0
OTHER
TESTS*
HOT
START
3.56
35.4
712.0
9.08
H.4
MODAL,LOADED
HFET
1.60
10.8
574.4
9.33
14.9
0 6h
72 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
4,70
63.4
673.7
7.16
11.3
COLD
STAB
4.03
51.4
700.0
4.14
11.2
IHCL
1559PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,03
27.6
588. 1
7.19
13,8
IHCG
1B0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.80
44.3
675.8
3.91
11.7
ICflL
1.3 X CO
ICOG
1,1 * CO
1972
FTP
4.36
57.2
687,2
5.61
11.2
1975
FTP
0.17
47,3
663,5
5,62
11.8
OTHER
TESTSt
HOT
START
3.91
36,1
633, 1
5,51
12,6
MODAL» A/C
HFET
2,56
15,6
468,4
7,18
17,7
067
72 OLDS 98 455
COLD
TRANS
8.47
37.5
883.2
6.34
9.2
COLD
STAB
1.63
16.5
884.6
3.89
9.7
IHCL
1324PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.24
19.6
780.5
6.92
10.8
IHCG
145PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1 ,66
13.9
894,5
4.10
9.6
1 COL
0.8 * CO
ICOG
1.2 * CO
1972
FTP
4.96
26.7
883.9
5.08
9.4
1975
FTP
3.23
21.8
855,4
5.24
9.9
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
1 .94
16.6
839.0
S.47
10,2
modal#loaded
HFFT
1.14
6.0
597.6
8.52
14.5
068
72 OPEL SfcDA 116
COLD
TRANS
3.25
54.2
421 .6
7.33
17.2
COLD
STAB
1 .99
18.0
420.0
7.83
19.5
IHCL
209OPPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.04
23.8
368.9
7.57
21.5
IHCG
155PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,03
19.5
401.3
6.53
20.2
ICOL
1.9 X Cfl
ICOG
2.1 * CO
197?
ftp
2.61
35.6
420.8
7.59
18.3
1975
FTP
2.27
27.2
406.2
7.65
19.5
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
2,03
21,6
385.5
7.04
20.8
MODAL
HFET
1 ,02
6.4
313,8
7,03
27.1
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1*1.
85 CARBON5HYDROGEN
RATIO
231
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING Of- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAI VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPF
i
1 u
1 X
1
1
grams i
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
069
72 PLYM VALI 225
COLD
TRANS
4.83
81.3
380.8
6.90
16,8
COLD
STAB
3.01
66.2
424, 5
7.33
16,5
IHCL
268BPPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.62
56.2
352.6
7.03
19.8
IHCG
1 8 0 PPM hexane-
HOT
STAB
3.31
75.1
391 .2
5,69
17.2
ICOL
4.3 X CO
I C( IG
3.2 X CO
1972
F TP
3.90
73.5
405.2
7.14
16.6
1975
FTP
3.29
66,6
396.2
7.17
17.4
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
start
?.97
64.8
372. a
6.3a
18.3
MODAL
HFET
1.49
25.3
290.8
7.<18
26.2
070
72 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
6,«6
1 10.a
677. 3
5.59
10.2
COLD
STAH
7,49
160.8
681 ,9
3,59
9,3
IHCL
0 1 3 1 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.53
111.1
601.5
4.54
11.2
IHCG
300PPM HF-XANE
HOT
STAB
7.3a
169.3
680.5
3.10
9.2
TCOL
5.2 * CO
I COG
5.6 X CO
1972
FTP
6.99
1 36.3
679.7
4.56
9. 1
1975
FTP
6.73
1 36,5
658,6
4,27
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.46
141.0
642.0
3.80
10.0
MODAL
HFET
3,45
54.6
483.2
4.31
15.3
071
7? PONT CATA 350
COLD
trans
10,35
1 05. 1
824.9
8.71
0.7
COLD
STAR
8.25
120.4
705.5
9.2 3
9.6
IHCL
99
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
MPG
VEH GRAMS PER MILE----- FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FCON
073
72 TOYO CORO 97
COLD
TRANS
3.92
36,7
359.6
a,06
20.7
COLD
STAB
2.U7
25,6
<423,7
2,32
18,8
IHCL
3285PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.66
22.7
332,6
3,56
23,6
IHCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.27
21,8
<423,9
2,23
19.1
I COL
2.5 X cn
ICOG
1.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.18
31,0
392,5
3.17
19,7
1975
FTP
2,83
27.1
385.0
3.03
20,3
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2,46
22.2
379,5
2.88
21,0
MODAL
HFET
1 ,«9
8.7
253,a
a, 10
32,7
07a
72 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
7,16
65,5
334.5
a. io
19,3
COLD
STAB
8,22
75,7
382.3
3.27
16,8
I HCL
8163PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,70
50.6
321.2
a.oi
21.2
IHCG
«65PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7,98
72.7
368,2
3.1?
17.S
ICOL
5,2 * cn
ICOG
a,2 * CO
1972
FTP
7,70
70,7
359,0
3,67
17.9
1975
FTP
7,30
66,6
355,3
3,65
18.a
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6,87
61.9
345,3
3.55
19.1
MflDAL
HFET
1.45
20.5
251.5
3,6a
30.8
075
72 VtlLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
8,79
98,6
405,7
4, 79
15,1
COLD
STAB
a, i o
73,6
420.9
3,72
16,1
I HCL
2288PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,61
5a,0
375.8
a.5a
18,8
IHCG
125PPM HEXANE
HI) T
STAB
a,13
72,2
410,8
3,ao
16.5
ICOL
3.3 % CO
ICOG
2.5 * CO
1972
FTP
6.38
85,8
413,5
a.2a
15.6
1975
FTP
a,95
73,a
405,2
a.17
16,6
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.88
63.3
393,8
3.95
17,6
MODAL
HFET
l.6a
20.5
328,2
a.36
2a,3
076
71 AMMLl STAW 304
COLD
TRANS
6.11
73,9
636.8
5.82
11.5
COLD
STAB
2.04
19.7
705.0
a.a7
12.0
I HCL
1592PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.35
2a.o
60H.5
8.29
13.5
IHCG
210PPM HEXANE
hot
STAB
2.30
27,3
690,6
4,40
12.0
ICOL
1.2 * CO
ICOG
2.1 X CO
1972
ftp
4,02
a6. l
671 ,8
5,12
11.7
1975
FTP
3.25
32.2
664.0
5.81
12.2
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
2.81
25.7
650.6
6,29
12.7
NONE
HFET
1.95
l o.a
a68.0
0,68
18.1
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A lll,85 C ARSON J HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPFNDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DF.TRMIT
VEH
NO,
YR MAKF MllDL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
• i_>
1 I
i
i
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
F CON
077
71 BiJlC LESA 350
COLD
TRANS
6,30
91.6
766.7
6.95
9.5
COLD
ST AH
«.61
20.9
831 .2
7.13
10,1
IHCL
254 8PPM CA RBON
HOT
TRANS
a.36
39.3
726.7
8.00
11.1
IHCG
255PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAR
4.60
31.6
831,2
7.66
9.9
I COL
1 ,4 X CO
t COG
1.1 % CO
1972
FTP
5.^3
55.3
799,8
7.04
9.8
1975
FTP
4,89
40.8
788.7
7.34
10.2
OTHER
TESTS:
hot
START
4,58
35.3
780 .4
7.83
10.4
. NONE
HFM
2.32
18.3
555.0
7.62
15.0
078
71 HIJIC ELEC 455
COLD
TRANS
8.67
1 63.8
753.5
7.10
8.5
COLD
STAB
6.33
107. 1
723.0
4,40
9.7
IHCL
9259PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.37
60.9
663. 1
8.05
1 1.5
IHCG
720PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAR
6.33
109.3
681 .3
4.00
10.2
ICOL
5.2 * Cii
T COG
8.0 X CO
1972
FTP
7.47
134.7
737 .9
5.7?
9.1
1975
FTP
6.28
106. 1
712,8
5.98
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.37
85.7
672,4
5.97
in.8
LOADED
HFET
2.52
27.7
556.9
7.33
14,6
079
71 CADI DEVI 472
COLD
TRANS
2.43
53.3
1033,7
10,48
7,9
COLD
STAB
1 .60
38.7
1086,3
8,05
7.7
IHCL
394PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
1.76
31.6
892,2
11.16
9,4
IHCG
65PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
1 .44
39,0
1050,2
7,27
B.O
ICOL
0.7 X CO
I COG
o.9 x cn
1972
FTP
2.00
45,8
1060,7
9,24
7.8
1975
FTP
1.82
39.8
1021,5
9.43
8.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
staht
1,60
35.4
973,3
9.16
6.6
NONE
HFET
0,66
12.6
668,5
11.10
12.9
080
71 CHf- V VEGA 1<10
COLD
trans
4.75
54, 1
279,5
2,61
25,4
COLD
stab
2.88
51,1
359,2
1 .73
19,H
IHCL
3683PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3.08
44,6
283,8
2.65
24, a
IHCG
240PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,15
59,9
355,7
1.53
19,3
ICOL
U. 7 X CO
ICOG
3.7 X CO
1972
FTP
3,79
52,5
320 ,4
2.16
21,4
1975
FTP
3,33
49,9
321 ,6
2.17
21,6
OTHER
T F S T s:
HOT
start
3.11
52,5
320.7
2,07
21,5
NONE
HFET
1.32
20,1
234,7
3.45
32.H
F UFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 C ARBHN j HYDROGEN R A T I (1
23H
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
•
1 LJ
• X
1
1
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE'
C02
mmmm m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
081
71 CHEV MALI 307
COLD
TRANS
6.30
57.a
577.6
1,86
12.9
COLD
STAB
3.5fl
28.1
636.1
4,26
12.8
IHCL
3783PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,40
27.0
529.1
5.30
15.2
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.21
31.8
645,7
3.79
12.6
ICOL
3.5 x en
ICOG
2,6 * CO
1972
FTP
a.9i
42.3
607,6
a.56
12.9
1975
FTP
a. 10
33.9
594 ,2
a.68
13.a
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.30
29.a
589,0
4,53
13,7
NONE
HFET
l.««
16.1
U61 ,0
3.20
18,1
082
71 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
TRANS
9,26
131.2
606,7
3,32
10,5
COLD
STAB
8.93
172.a
617,5
2,04
9,7
IHCL
3733PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.38
1 12.a
534.6
3,51
12,1
IHCG
400PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.31
187.3
605,8
2,09
9,6
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
5.a X CO
1972
FTP
9,09
152.3
612.2
2,66
10,1
1975
FTP
8.57
147,1
592,3
2.71
10,4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7.86
150.9
571 ,2
2, 78
10.7
NONE
HFET
5.2a
63,2
«12.8
3,06
16.8
083
71 CHEV STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
CO
•
77.4
727.2
8.37
10.3
cold
STAB
4,16
65.3
695.3
6.13
10.9
IHCL
4151 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,32
59.2
644.9
7.82
11.9
IHCG
430PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,34
74,4
680.4
5.89
10,9
ICOL
4,8 X CO
ICOG
5, 1 X Cfl
1972
FTP
a.27
71.2
710,8
7.22
10.6
1975
ftp
3,97
66.1
688,0
7.07
1 1.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
start
3.84
67.0
663.1
6.83
11 .4
A/C
HFET
1.92
27.8
545.6
8.18
14.9
084
71 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
12.20
123,6
574.6
^.37
U.O
COLD
STAB
5.36
85.9
571 ,8
3.21
12.3
IHCL
3833PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.52
49.0
540,5
5.28
14.0
IHCG
370PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB.
5,33
81,3
568,1
3,04
12.5
ICOL
U.O X CO
ICOG
3,6 X CO
1972
FTP
8,69
104,3
573. 1
3,78
11.6
1975
FTP
6,56
83,6
563.7
4.03
12.4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4,93
65,6
554,7
4.13
13.2
NONE
HFET
3,27
26,2
447 ,0
5.17
17,8
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON!HYDROGEN RATIO
235
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING HP FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURE RESULTS
On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
Nfl.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PfcR MILE
C02
NOXC
MHG
H.IEL
ECON
nR5
71 CHtV IMPA ^00
COLD
TRANS
3.81
01.2
725.2
7. ?H
11.1
COLD
STAB
2,00
13,0
807,6
6,70
10,6
IHCL
149}PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2,66
16.5
668.3
B.36
12,6
ihcg
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
2.27
13,6
768. 1
6.0Q
11.1
I COL
0.1 x cn
ICOG
0.1 * CO
1972
FTP
3,10
26.8
767.5
7.00
10,8
1975
FTP
2.79
19,9
751,7
7,31
11.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.06
15.0
719.5
7.00
11,H
LOADED
HFET
1.19
12.9
082.7
7.15
17,5
086
71 CHRY 300 OOO
COLD
trans
7.9a
90.2
823.6
2.99
9.0
COLD
STAH
2.00
36.7
870.5
?.29
9.5
I HC L
2688PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.71
^1.5
750.7
3.20
10.7
IHCG
055PPM HEXANfc
HOT
STAB
2.26
30.0
859.0
2.33
9.6
ICOL
0.2 X CO
ICOG
0.2 X CO
1972
FTP
0,89
bl.l
807.6
2.63
9.2
1975
FTP
3,00
09.2
828,5
2.69
9.7
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
2.08
37,8
808,5
2.76
10,1
NONE
HFET
1 ,56
29.0
626. 1
2.90
13.1
087
71 DATS SEDA 71
COLD
TRANS
19,95
82,9
250,5
? , 1 9
19.8
COLD
ST AR
2.80
21,6
297. 7
2.60
26. 1
IHCL
3783PP^ CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,60
18,2
250, l
3,03
30,5
IHCG
280PPM hEXANE
HOT
STAB
2,71
19.6
288.0
2.55
?7.1
ICOL
3.8 * CO
ICOG
r'.B X CO
1972
F TP
11.15
51.0
276.7
2.02
22.6
1975
f TP
6.35
33.5
276.6
2.65
25,0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
2.67
18.9
27 1 .5
2.78
28.7
NONE
HFFT
1.02
10.2
206,0
0.03
33,2
088
71 DODG CHAR 318
COLD
TRANS
5.39
77.3
735, 1
5,70
10.2
COLD
STAB
3.00
00,3
669, 1
0,77
12.0
IHCL
398PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.70
28.0
601 .0
6.70
12,8
IHCG
90PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.80
32.5
670, 7
5.01
12. 1
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICOG
0.2 * CO
1972
FTP
0,16
58,3
701,2
5,22
11,0
1975
FTP
3,03
00,6
675,2
5,51
11,7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.77
30.3
656, 0
5.85
12,5
LOADFD
HFET
1,30
7,7
521 , 1
6,95
16.5
FUEL f-CnNOHY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CAkHuN: HYDROGEN RATIl)
2--)o
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MnDL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NflXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
089
71 FORD PINT 122
COLD
TRANS
3.4B
40. 7
370.0
6.87
19.9
CULD
STAB
3.37
7.5
385.0
7.36
21.8
IHCL
1129PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.02
13.1
312.3
7.43
25.9
IHCG
165PPM HEXANff
HOT
STAB
3,20
1.5
360. 1
6.86
23.5
ICOL
0.2 x cn
ICflG
0 . a X CO
1972
FTP
3.43
23.6
377. 7
7.12
20.8
1975
FTP
3,30
16.0
361 . 7
7.27
?2.i
OTHE R
TF STSS
HOT
STAPT
3.11
8.7
336.9
7.13
2a.6
NONE
HFt T
l. 3a
3.8
257.7
7.31
33.1
090
71 FORD HAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
0,00
12.9
537.9
7.86
15.5
COLD
stab
2.81
«1.5
46B. 2
5,99
16.4
I HCL
33U5PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.52
21.6
a27.7
6.03
18.9
IHCG
290PPM HEXANE
H()T
STAB
2.68
36.9
U57.3
5.36
16.9
ICOL
5.2 X CO
I COG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
3.39
27.6
502.2
6.90
16,0
1975
FTP
2.9R
30.0
471 .*»
6.95
16.H
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
2.60
' 29,5
442.9
6.66
17.8
NONE
HFET
i.«s
6.2
353.7
7.17
24. 1
091
71 FORD TOR I 302
COLD
TRANS
5.59
65.9
591 .9
6.62
12.4
COLD
STAB
3.66
62.3
602,0
4.29
12,5
IHCL
34B4PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.30
32.8
538.5
7.62
14. H
IHCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.45
52.6
604,9
4 .68
12.7
ICOL
5.2 x en
I COG
3.5 * CM
1972
FTP
4.60
64. 1
597. 1
5.42
12,5
1975
FTP
3.96
54.9
582.3
5.70
13,0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.38
42.9
572,6
6.11
13,6
LOADED
HFET
2.40
8.5
461 ,4
7.23
18,4
092
71 FORD LTD 351
COLD
TRANS
7.76
102,0
623.0
4.93
11.0
COLD
STAB
3.93
41.6
681 . 1
«.23
11.7
IHCL
25P8PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,86
35.8
650.2
7.10
12.3
IHCG
270PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3,79
34,6
744. 1
4,64
11 .0
ICOL
2.0 X CO
ICOG
1.5 X CO
1972
ft'p
5,80
71.0
652,8
«.57
11.3
1975
FTP
4.99
52.6
660.3
5.17
1 1.7
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4,31
35.2
698.4
5.84
11,6
A/C
HFET
2,29
25.3
505.0
6.73
16.1
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
R5 CARBONJHYDROGEN
RA 1 10
<±51
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEOtRAL TEST PROCEDURF RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DFTROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CIP
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
m • m m m
NUXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
093
71 FfJRD LTD 400
COLD
TRANS
4.21
67.9
758.8
8.31
10.1
COLD
STAB
2.83
39.S
785. 8
8.17
10.4
IHCL
1891 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.5a
2a.5
665,0
9.82
12.5
I Hf G
155PPM HEXANt
HOT
STAB
2.77
42, 1
757.2
7.46
10,7
I COL
2.6 * cn
I COG
2.6 * CO
1 *?72
FTP
3.SO
53.3
772.6
8.24
10.2
1975
FTP
3.04
"1.3
7ufe,6
8.65
1 0,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.66
33.5
712.3
8.61
11.5
none
HF E T
1 .32
9.5
536.9
10.20
16,0
09U
71 MERC MONT 400
COLD
TRANS
4,48
84.1
521 .5
4.83
13.3
COLD
STAB
2.59
49. 1
628.a
6.17
12.4
IHCL
2887PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.6a
26.3
552.6
7.37
14.7
IHCG
230PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.30
41.?
596.5
5.85
13.3
I COL
4,2 X CO
IC'lG
4.0 * CO
1972
FTP
3.51
66.2
576.3
5.52
12.8
1975
FTP
3.00
50.1
585. 0
6.22
13.2
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
2.47
34.0
575. 1
6.59
13.9
LOADED
HFFT
1.32
8.6
546.8
8.17
lb.7
095
71 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRANS
4.13
a 9. o
7 1 a . 6
4.20
11,0
COLD
STAR
2.74
30.9
728.3
5.95
11.3
IHCL
3932PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.25
17.8
585.9
7,46
14,3
IHCG
290PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.6b
34.2
686. 3
5.09
1 1,9
I COL
5,? X CO
ICOG
4.2 X CO
1972
ftp
3.41
39.8
721 .6
5.10
11.2
1975
F TP
2.89
31.1
685,9
6.00
11.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,4fe
26.2
637.a
6.24
12.9
NONE
HFET
1 .68
13.7
448.3
7.14
18.7
096
71 OLDS Dfe'LT 455
COLD
TRANS
3,12
95,7
778,a
7,00
9.5
COLD
STAB
1 ,66
24,2
854.5
4.56
9.9
IHCL
10U5PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2,a 7
2a,7
686,6
7,83
12. 1
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
1,73
25,4
804,6
3.93
10.4
I COL
1.1 X CO
I COG
1.2 X en
1972
FTP
2,37
59.0
817,4
5.75
9.7
1975
ftp
2,19
39.3
792,0
5,98
10.3
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
2,09
25. 1
747, 1
5.83
11.2
A/C
HFET
1 .19
16.3
515.2
8.26
16.3
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C # COM 1 D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLF.S IN DETROIT
VEh
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
mmmmm 1
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
CCJ2
NllXC
MPG
FUEL
t CON
097
71 PLYM VALI ?25
COLD
TRANS
S.a?
84.h
462,0
7.29
14.5
COLD
STAB
3.72
49.5
456, 1
7.48
lh.3
IHCL
2538ppm cAfrH0N
HOT
TRANS
*.?4
at .1
434,1
fl.Sl
17.4
IHCG
250PPM HEXANF.
HOT
STAB
3.70
48.4
460.2
7.30
16.2
ICOL
3.2 X CO
I cor,
3.2 X CO
1972
FTP
66.7
459.0
7.38
IS.3
197b
FTP
3.9U
5«,fe
451.2
7.72
16,2
OTHER
U STSS
HOT
START
3.17
44,8
447.5
7,89
16.8
NONE
HFfcT
1 .si
17.6
374.2
7.HO
21 .8
098
71 PLYM SATE 316
COLD
TRANS
5,06
59.7
612,1
6,4 1
12.3
COLD
STAB
4.24
60,2
569,0
5.49
13,1
IHCL
2389PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3,05
32.7
552,6
7.41
1«.5
IHCG
205PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
4,20
64.5
559,9
S.37
13,2
ICOL
2.9 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
4,64
60.0
590,0
S.94
12.7
1975
F TP
4,08
52.5
573,5
6.22
13.3
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.64
49.0
556,3
6,36
13.8
A/C
HFfcT
2,««
20,1
474 ,5
7,66
17.3
099
71 PONT FIRE 350
COLD
TRANS
5,74
/j 9 ,a
703,8
4,09
U.l
COLD
STAR
3,03
42,6
671 ,a
2.66
11.0
IHCL
3484PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.31
23.1
638,4
3,77
13.0
IHCG
305PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.54
37,0
667 ,7
2.59
12.1
ICOL
4,0 X CP
icnr.
4.0 t CO
1972
FTP
4.35
45.9
687 ,«
3.36
11.5
1975
FTP
3,40
38,6
669,2
3.27
12.0
n thp w
tfsts:
HOT
START
2,45
30,3
653,4
3.17
12.5
NONE
HFfcT
1,07
10.3
540, 1
3.53
15,9
100
71 PONT GTO 400
COLD
TRAnS
4.72
48,7
749.7
7.12
10,6
COLD
stab
4.73
79,8
669,0
3.43
11.0
IHCL
4878PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,66
40,9
639,2
8.00
12.4
IHCG
420PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
4.43
73.3
652. 1
3,26
11.4
ICOL
5,2 X CO
ICOG
6.2 * CO
1972
FTP
1.73
64,7
708.3
5,23
10,8
1975
F TP
4.43
62,5
677 .6
5,47
11.2
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
4,06
57,5
645.8
5,56
11.8
1HADFD
HFET
4,52
12,4
598. 1
11,48
14.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBONJ HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
[jRAMS 1
CO
PtR MILE
C 02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
101
71 TOYll CORO 97
COLD
TRANS
6,73
39.7
289.2
5,49
23,8
COLD
STAB
4.09
51.3
299. 1
3.98
22,6
IHCL
4 7 78PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.30
32.6
272.6
5.29
26,6
IHCG
350PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.40
52.2
300 . 1
3.97
22,4
ICOL
4.9 X Cf 1
I COG
3.8 x crj
1972
ftp
5.37
45.6
294.3
«.7l
23,2
1«)75
FTP
4.42
«3.7
289.7
4.66
23,8
OTHER
Te STS:
HOT
START
3.87
42.7
286.7
4.62
24,2
NONIr
HFFT
1.71
18.1
262, 7
5.99
29,9
102
71 VflLK Sf D A 97
COLD
trans
4.91
62.0
335. 1
3.92
19,8
COLD
STAB
3.73
42.0
384.0
2.94
19,2
IHCL
24R8PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.96
32.4
312.4
3.59
23,8
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.09
37.6
377.8
2.86
19,7
ICOL
0,9 X CO
ICOG
0.7 X CO
1972
FTP
a.30
51.8
360.2
3.42
19,5
1975
F TP
3.7 6
«3,5
353,9
3.33
20,4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.5*1
35.0
345.9
3.21
21.5
NONfc
HFET
1.34
18.3
248. 1
3,80
31 ,h
10 3
70 BUIC STAW 05b
COLD
TRANS
7.11
106.2
699. 7
9.63
10,0
COLD
STAR
9.09
71.2
674.3
10.22
10.9
IHCL
4977PP* CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.61
33.9
651 . 0
13.67
12.3
IHCG
340PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
5.37
37.7
727,4
12,77
11,0
ICOL
5.2 X CO
I COG
3,8 X CO
1972
FTP
H. 13
88.2
686,6
9,93
10,4
1975
FTP
7.43
68.2
b 7 3 , 1
1 1 .05
11,0
UTHEP
TESTSJ
HOT
STAPT
5.00
35.8
690.2
13,20
11.6
NONE
HFET
2.83
4 1.4
570,4
13,01
13.8
100
70 CHEV NOVA 250
COLD
TMANS
5.42
67.9
084.3
6,13
14.6
COLD
STAB
2.91
44. 1
539,6
4,92
14.4
IHCL
4231PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.93
30,2
467,3
7,56
16.9
IHCG
250PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.85
46. 1
515,1
5,21
14.9
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
5.2 X CO
1972
FTP
".13
55.7
512,7
5,51
1«.5
1975
FTP
45.2
508.0
5,90
15.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.89
38.4
491 ,8
6, 35
15.8
NONE
HFET
1.32
5.2
363.4
8,25
2 3.6
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS <
ASSUME
A 1:1
.85 CARBON:HYDROGEn
RATIO
,?•' si
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
flN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DFTROIT
MPG
vfcH .-..-GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MQDL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
Nf)XC
ECON
1 05
70 CHEV NOVA 307
COLD
TRANS
7.72
63.0
559.a
8.6a
13.0
COLD
STAB
7.12
73.1
562.5
6.59
12.7
IHCL
6171 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.51
51. U
512.7
8.78
l a .5
IHCG
560PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.72
71.5
55a.2
6.78
12.9
I C CIL
5,2 x Co
ICOG
tt.5 X CO
1972
FTP
7.«1
68.2
561 .0
7.59
12.8
1975
FTP
6.80
6a.9
5a8,0
7.63
13.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.1 3
61.7
53a.0
7.76
13,6
NONE
HFET
3.98
ai .6
ai o.a
7.81
18.2
106
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
3a.91
91.3
596. 1
6,2a
10.a
COLD
STAB
30.80
8a.o
639.2
5.38
10.2
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
27.62
62.5
560.a
6.28
11.9
IHCG
1600PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
30.59
98.2
619.1
a.76
10.2
ICOL
a.7 X CO
ICOG
3.a * CO
1972
FTP
32,80
87.5
618.2
5.80
10.3
1975
FTP
30.78
79.5
608. 3
5.81
10,7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
29.15
80.8
590.5
5,50
11.0
NONE
HFET
16.ao
25.6
a5a, 8
6.12
16,2
107
70 CHEV MONT 350
COLD
trans
6,63
96.6
580, 3
5,86
11 .R
COLD
STAB
a.67
120.5
508.9
3.10
12.a
IHCL
3982PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.72
75.9
a83.8
5.53
la.a
IHCG
370PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
5.08
128.7
a98.2
2.93
12.a
ICOI.
5.2 X CO
ICOG
5.5 * CO
1972
FTP
5,62
108,9
5a3.6
a.aa
12.1
1975
FTP
a.82
103.1
516,9
a.35
12.8
HTHEP
TESTS:
HOT
START
a. a2
103,0
a9i ,2
a. 19
13.3
LOADED
HFET
2.6a
as,2
390.2
5.0U
18.7
108
70 CHEV IMPA 350
COLD
TRANS
9.03
65,6
590,6
9,ea
12.3
COLD
STAB
8.39
98.2
577.7
6.99
11,7
IHCL
99a6PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.79
5a,2
605.9
9.38
12,5
IHCG
flaOPPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.99
91,7
608, 7
8. 18
11,a
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
7,2 X CO
1972
FTP
8.70
82.3
58a,0
8,38
12,0
1975
FTP
8,08
79.2
588,2
8.25
12.0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7, ao
73,a
607.3
8.76
11, 9
LOADED
HFET
3,a7
22.9
518.0
1 1 .62
15,7
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
a l:i.
85 CARBON;HYDROGEN
RATIO
2"+l
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEh
NO.
YR MAKF MOOL CID
TEST
TYPE
•
1
X •
r\ %
s
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
CO 2
Noxr
MPG
FUEL
ECflN
109
70 CHEV CAPR 400
CULD
TRANS
8,28
l?0.fe
660.5
6.20
10.1
COLD
STAB
5.47
<*3.7
642.8
5.03
11,0
IHCL
5177PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
«.53
69.2
589.8
6.77
12.4
IHCG
365PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
5.15
91.1
629.7
4.44
11.2
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
5.4 X CO
1«»72
FTP
6,84
106,8
651 .a
5.60
10,6
1975
FTP
5,80
92.5
631 .8
5,76
11,2
OTHER
TF STS:
HOT
START
4,85
ao.u
610.3
5.57
11.8
NONE
HFET
2.59
42.2
472.3
7.06
16.2
1 10
7 0 DODG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
6.21
73,0
602,3
7.31
12.0
COLD
STAB
4.51
78.8
656.4
6.57
11.2
IHCL
2190PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.61
55.5
592.6
8.46
12.8
IHCG
140PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.23
76.2
650,6
6.75
11.3
ICOL
3.4 X CO
ICOG
2.4 X CO
1972
FTP
5.34
76.0
630. 1
6.93
11.6
1975
FTP
4,6?
71.1
627,4
7.25
11.8
OTHER
TESTS?
HOT
START
3,93
66. 1
622,4
7.58
12.0
NONE
HFET
1 .99
17.9
494,2
9,52
16,8
111
70 FORD MAVE 200
COLD
TRANS
3.20
U6.4
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING fU FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MfJDL CID
TEST
TYPE
i i
i i_» i
• X 1
i i
i i
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
• • • m m
NOXC
mPG
FUEL
EC UN
113
70 FORD GALA 351
COLD
TRANS
11.25
86.3
565,a
8,14
12.0
COLD
STAB
7.16
125.9
59a. 1
6.21
10,9
IHCL
7964PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,16
71. 4
536.2
8.89
13.a
IHCG
aeoppM HEXANE
HOT
STAH
5.59
115. 1
555, a
5.71
11.8
ICOL
5,2 X CO
1 COG
5.5 * en
1
-------
APPENDIX C tCONT'D
LISTING flF f-EOtRAL TEST PROCEDURF RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
-----GRAMS PER MILE
HC CO C02
NOXC
MP G
FUEL
ECON
1 17
70 OLDS CUTL 350
COLD
TRAnS
5.35
81.3
632."
6.15
11."
CULO
STAB
3.M
"6,1
720."
5.13
11,0
I HCL
1692PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.12
35.8
536.8
5.37
14,6
IHCG
120PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
3.61
39,0
633. 1
3.28
12,6
icniL
1.1 X CO
I COG
0.8 X CO
1972
FTP
4,"6
63.2
677.5
5.63
11.2
1975
FTP
4.12
50.6
651 .0
5." 1
11.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,86
37.a
586.2
".30
13.5
NONE
HFET
2.97
".7
""5.3
6.10
19.2
lie
70 OLDS 98 455
COLD
tpans
2.18
16.8
789.0
8.65
10.8
COLD
STAR
2.29
16.0
813.9
5.83
10.5
IHCL
796PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
2.95
1 6.a
700 .9
8.10
12.1
IHCG
flOPPM HEXANE"
HOT
STAR
2.45
16."
789.2
5.2"
10.8
ICOL
0.1 X CO
ICnG
0,1 X LO
1972
F TP
2.23
16.4
801 .8
7.20
10.6
1975
FTP
2.45
16.3
77 7."
7.05
10,9
flTHER
tfsts:
HOT
START
2.69
16."
746.2
6.63
11.4
LOADED
HFET
1.50
".8
543.8
8.38
16.0
1 19
7 0 PI.YM SATE 318
COLD
TRANS
3.95
"6,0
647, 8
8.72
12, 1
COLO
STAR
<4.39
72.6
616.6
7.33
11.9
IHCL
4579PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.16
"1.2
556.8
8.21
14.1
IHCG
245PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
4.30
80.0
617."
7.28
11.7
I COL
5.2 X CO
icnG
5,3 X CO
1972
FTP
4, 18
59.6
631.8
8.01
12,0
1975
FTP
3,96
58.3
606,6
7,87
12,5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
start
3.7"
61 . 1
587.9
7.7"
12.8
NONE
HFET
1 .98
18.9
"38,8
8.30
18.7
1 20
70 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
5. 38
85.8
548, 1
5.95
12.7
COLD
STAH
5,66
1"7.9
54".9
5.1"
11.2
IHCL
ft77OPPM CARBON
HOT
TRAnS
"•15
72.9
494, 7
6."4
14.3
IHCG
400PPM HEXANt
HOT
STAB
a,97
111.7
525,6
a .84
12."
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
6.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.53
117.7
546,5
5.53
11,9
1975
FTP
5.18
11".1
531,6
5.67
12.2
OTHER
Th STS:
HOT
START
".57
92.8
510,5
5,62
13.2
NONE
HFET
2.36
35."
"15.9
6.47
18.5
fuel
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1,
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
£^<4 r
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MflDL CIO
TEST
TYPE
1
• o
• X
•
1
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
121
70 PUNT FIRE 350
COLD
TRANS
6. 53
76.2
630.2
7,31
11.5
COLD
stab
6,18
122,3
598.fi
a.87
10,9
IHCL
9916PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
1.53
60.8
557.a
7.13
13,3
IHCG
hi 0PPM HEXANf
HOT
STAH
7,63
133.a
579.2
5.19
10.9
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
7.1 * CO
1972
FTP
6.35
99,9
614.1
6.06
11.2
1975
FTP
5.79
95.6
593.9
6.09
11.6
tlTHHR
TESTS:
HOT
START
6.12
98,0
568,6
6.13
12,0
NONE
HFET
2,78
27,2
153,2
6,67
17.6
122
70 PHNT STAW 100
COLD
TRANS
6.68
126.8
806.6
9.07
8.6
COLD
STAB
5.19
80.8
785. 1
8.86
9.6
IHCL
318«PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,84
19. 1
685. 1
10.93
1 1.5
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a.73
71.8
758. 7
8,77
10,0
ICOL
3.5 X CO
ICUG
2.9 * en
1972
FTP
5.91
103.2
795,6
8,96
9.1
1975
FTP
5.13
81.6
761 .9
9.18
9.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
1,29
60.7
722.9
9.82
10.7
NONE
HFET
?.12
16.6
525.5
12.52
15.9
123
70 TOYO CORO 116
COLD
TRANS
3,61
18,1
378,8
5.71
19.0
COLD
STAB
3,30
66, 1
381 .a
3.97
17.9
IHCL
6272PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,27
31.9
352,6
5.89
21.5
IHCG
380PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.43
67.6
397.0
1.35
17.3
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
6. 1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.15
57.5
380.1
1.83
18,1
1975
F TP
3.36
52,9
372,9
1,87
19,0
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.35
50,2
375,1
5.10
19.1
NONE
HFET
1 .56
13.2
308,0
7.09
26.6
121
70 VOLK SEDA 97
COLD
TRANS
3,16
36,2
319,7
2,80
21.3
COLD
STAB
2.68
21.3
127.1
2.20
18.9
IHCL
1592PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.39
19.6
329,1
2.70
21,1
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
3.77
22.9
109,3
2,01
19,1
I COL
0.1 x en
ICOG
0.1 X CO
1972
FTP
3.06
28.5
389,1
2.19
20,0
1975
FTP
2,76
23.9
383.8
2.17
20.6
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.10
21.2
370.1
2.35
21.5
NONE
HFET
0,89
8.0
255.5
2.83
32.8
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
a in.
85 CARBONtHYDROGEN
RATIO
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
MPG
VfcH —...GRAMS PFR MILE----- FUEL
NO,
YR MAKE MODL C ID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
125
69 AMMO AMflA 343
COLD
TRANS
8.9U
106,3
569,0
4,35
1 1,6
COLD
STAB
6.37
1 2R. 1
597,5
2,67
10,8
IHCL
3882PPM CAWBON
HOT
TRANS
6.01
115.3
515,0
3,78
12.4
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.30
139,7
509,7
2.49
10,7
I COL
a.6 * CO
ICOG
4.0 X CO
1972
FTP
7,62
117.5
583,6
3.49
11.2
1975
FTP
6,61
120.0
568,7
3,33
1 1 .4
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6,16
127,9
553. 3
3.12
11.5
NONE
HFET
4.60
90 .4
4Q7.4
a,3a
15.7
126
69 BUIC SPEC 350
COLD
TRANS
4,85
71,1
557, 1
7,11
13.0
COLD
STAB
3,33
59.4
606,4
4 ,96
12,5
IHCL
2190PPM CARBON
HOT
Trans
2.55
34.1
505,7
7.71
15,6
IHCG
180PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.11
56.0
592,7
4,99
12.9
I COL
2,5 X CO
ICOG
2,0 5! CO
1972
' FTP
4,07
65, 1
582,4
6,01
12,7
1975
V TP
3,43
54.8
568, 1
6.17
13, *
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2,83
45,3
550.4
6,32
14,1
NONE
HFET
1 ,60
lb.4
427, 1
7.51
19.4
127
69 CHEV BELA 250
COLD
TRANS
11,30
55.8
441,6
4,41
15,7
COLD
STAB
5,88
36.9
450.0
4 .84
16,9
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4,19
27.2
405,8
5,51
19,2
IHfG
420PPM HEXANf-
HOT
STAR
6,20
36.3
435,0
5.00
17,3
ICOL
3.2 X CO
ICOG
2.8 X Cn
1972
F TP
8,52
46, 1
445,9
4,63
16,3
1975
FTP
6.54
38,2
436.0
4,94
17.2
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
5.22
31.9
420.8
5.25
18,2
NONE
HFET
1.31
5.4
317.5
6.16
26,9
1 ?8
69 CHKV CHEV 307
COLD
trans
15,40
262.2
437.3
1 .89
9.9
CULD
STAB
5.98
74.0
554.5
4.90
12.9
IHCL
3484PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
5.46
80,1
491 ,4
5.36
14.0
IHCG
325PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,57
58,4
558,2
5,45
13.3
ICOL
2.8 * CO
ICOG
2.0 X CO
1972
FTP
10,56
165,6
497 ,5
3.43
11.2
1975
FTP
7.81
115.1
512,5
4.40
12,4
OTHER
tests;
HOT
START
5.51
69.0
525.7
5.40
13,6
NONE
HFET
4.06
55. 1
416.3
5.78
17,2
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.05 C ARHON: HYDROGEN RATIO
d'fo
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TF ST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CD
PER MILf-
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
129
6<* CHFV IMPA 327
COLD
TRANS
17.54
1 24.4
553.7
5.47
11.0
COLD
STAR
30.08
80.2
567,5
6.75
11.2
IHCL
9946PRM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
19. 46
74.a
489.1
6.61
13.3
IHCG
1 6 0 0PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
29.49
79.8
517.5
6.20
12.1
ICOL
4.7 X cn
ICOG
3.4 X CO
1972
FTP
23.98
101.7
560.8
6.13
11.1
1975
FTP
24.51
87.8
542.9
6.45
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
24.61
77.2
503.6
6.40
12.6
NONE
HFfcT
8.11
44.7
424.6
6.60
17.0
130
69 CHEV MALI 350
COLD
TRANS
15.10
161.9
495.9
5.30
11.1
COLD
STAB
6.31
112.0
560.0
6.16
11.7
IHCL
637 1 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.27
52.8
541 .9
9.27
13,8
IHCG
520PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAR
5.54
91.9
577.0
6.75
12.0
I COL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
5.4 x cn
1972
FTP
10.59
136,3
528.8
5.74
11.«
1975
FTP
7.86
106.0
541 .6
6,84
12.1
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
5.41
72.9
560.0
7.98
12,8
LOADED
HFFT
2.50
14.4
412.8
7,08
20.0
131
69 CHEV STAW 350
COLD
TRANS
5.11
90.2
655.7
9.18
10,9
COLD
STAB
4.57
76.3
668. 1
9.52
11.1
IHCL
3185PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
3,56
39.8
609.9
11.15
13.0
IHCG
345PPM HEXANF.
HOT
STAB
4.26
73.7
659.0
9.78
11.3
ICOL
4.9 X CO
ICOG
4.9 x cn
1972
FTP
4.84
83.1
662. 1
9.35
1 1 .0
1975
FTP
4.41
69. 1
649.4
9.90
11.5
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.92
57.2
635. 1
10.45
12.0
LOADED
HFET
2.12
8.9
501.2
10,22
17.0
1 52
69 CHFV CAPR 350
COLD
TRANS
9,68
160.8
533,5
4.87
10.9
COLD
STAB
4.30
119.2
590,3
3.48
11.2
IHCL
3685PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
«.17
84.8
525.6
5.67
13.2
IHCG
230PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
«.21
111,6
588,3
3.51
11.«
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
4.3 X CO
1972
FTP
6.92
139.5
562,6
4.16
11,0
1975
FTP
5,39
118.4
560,5
4.38
11,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.19
98,6
557,8
4.56
12.2
NONE
HFfcT
2.72
60.4
437,8
5.48
16.4
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUMF
A 1: 1 .
85 CARBON|HYDROGEN
RATIO
Z^7
-------
APPeNinlX C,CONT'D
LISTING CI F FEDERAL TEST PROCE DURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CIU
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
EC ON
1 33
69 CHWY STAW 383
COLO
TRANS
32.16
330 .9
560. 1
3.78
7.5
COLD
ST-AB
6.39
1 02.6
699, a
8.5a
10,1
IHCL
23H9PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,91
103.1
63a. 1
7.77
10,9
IHCG
220PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,00
106.8
666. 1
7.79
10.2
ICOL
2.8 X CO
I COG
2.5 * CO
1972
FTP
18,93
213,7
633,5
6.23
8,6
197b
FTP
1 1 .65
150.5
653.0
7.33
9,6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.96
105.0
660,8
7.78
10,5
LOADFD
HFET
3.5a
65.5
<180.u
6.11
la.q
13a
69 DODG DART 225
COLD
TRANS
5.29
78.3
a«9.o
7.1«
15,1
COLD
STAB
3.13
32.9
aa6.5
7.50
17,5
IHCL
3683PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.52
25.0
aoa, o
7.80
19,7
I HCG
330PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
2.96
33.3
a3i. 3
6.39
18,0
ICOL
a. 1 X CO
I COG
3.8 X CO
1972
FTP
a. 18
55,0
aa 7,9
7.3«
16,2
1975
FTP
3. a l
ao,2
ai5, 3
7,52
17.a
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
2.75
29.2
aifl.o
7.07
18.8
NflNE
HFET
1.72
13.0
3U2.8
6.57
2a, 1
135
69 FORD FAIR 302
COLD
TRAMS
6.55
51.9
531.7
8.76
1 a, o
COLD
stab
5.21
69.a
530.5
6.a2
13,5
IHCL
3882PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3,63
39.3
a96.5
8.81
15.6
I HCG
320PPM HEXANE
HOT
stab
a. as
69.a
535.a
6.71
13.5
ICOL
5.2 X CO
I COG
a.l * CO
1972
FTP
5,86
60.9
531,1
7.56
15.8
1975
FTP
5.05
57.a
521.3
7.57
1 a. i
nTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
a.05
5a.7
516.5
7.7a
1 a. a
NONF
HFET
1 .98
11.7
a 1 2.2
7.73
20.3
136
69 FORD FAIR 302
COLD
TRANS
5,39
72.7
552.9
7.9H
1 3.a
COLD
STAB
a,76
6a,2
a96.7
6,98
1«.5
IHCL
8a6?PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,6a
31,3
a56,2
8,82
17.2
I HCG
1100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
a,28
52.2
a96.5
6.67
15.0
ICOL
3.2 * CO
ICOG
2.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.06
68.3
5ia, 5
7.U6
13.9
1975
FTP
a.58
56.8
a93.0
7.70
1 a.9
OTHER
tests:
HOT
start
3.97
a2.0
a76,9
7.72
16.0
LOADED
HFET
2,25
8.6
385. 1
7.92
21.9
HJtL ECDNQMY CALCULATIONS ASSHMf- A 1:1,85 C ARBON: H YDROGEn HAT 1(1
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES TN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE HODL CID
TEST
TYPE
i
I
X 1
O |
I
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
CU2
m m m m m
N[)XC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
137
69 FORD MUST 351
COLD
TRANS
5.38
62,0
580,8
#>.39
12.8
COLD
STAB
3.72
48.o
570,2
5.24
13.5
IHCL
2389PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.31
29.1
520.0
7.01
15.4
IHCG
255PHM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.55
45. 8
559.3
5.31
13,8
I COL
3.2 5! CO
I COG
2.9 X CO
1972
FTP
'i.53
5a, 8
575.a
5.80
13,1
1975
FTP
3,96
U5.7
558,5
5.97
13,8
OTHfiR
TFSTS:
HOT
START
3.«3
37,7
5^0,2
6.14
14,5
NONE
HFET
2.15
16.9
429.2
5.94
19.2
1 38
69 FORD MUST 351
COLD
trans
5,67
50,6
614,6
6.B3
12,5
COLD
STAB
4,83
71,0
579.5
3,47
12,6
IHCL
5455PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,97
35.8
528.9
6.69
14,8
IHCG
415PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.77
69.6
561 ,0
3,83
12.9
ICOL
5.2 X CO
I COG
S . 7 * CO
1972
FTP
5,24
61 , 1
596,6
5.10
12,5
1975
FTP
4.77
57.0
572,8
5.07
13.1
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4,38
53,?
545,4
5,22
13.8
LOADED
HFET
2,23
11.5
468.5
6.73
18. n
139
69 FORD GALA 390
COLD
trans
5.46
79,3
708 . 7
8. UH
1 0,«
COLD
STAB
4,98
89,8
635,6
6,41
11.2
IHCL
5296PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAMS
4.06
51,4
589,3
8.56
13.0
IHCG
a45PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.91
92,5
613.2
5.90
11.5
ICOL
5,2 * CO
I COG
7.5 X CO
1972
FTP
5,21
84,7
671 . 1
7.42
10,8
1975
FTP
4,82
77,0
638.0
7,40
11.5
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
4,50
72,5
601 .6
7.19
12.2
A/C
HFET
2,44
23,0
504.8
7.75
16,2
140
69 MEWC MONT 390
COLD
TRANS
6,34
106. 1
643,6
6.57
10.7
COLD
STAB
5.20
68,8
697,4
6.80
10.8
IHCL
1792PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4,52
46,8
627.5
8.87
12,4
IHCG
210PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.19
73.5
697.4
6.40
10.7
ICOL
1,3 % CO
I COG
2,2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.76
86,9
671 ,2
6.69
10.7
1975
FTP
5,25
70,5
666.8
7.33
11.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4,07
60,5
663,4
7,60
11.5
A/C
HFET
3.34
32,6
492,2
8,06
16,0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDHOGEN RATIO
2*4
-------
APPENDIX C/CIINT'D
LISTING (11- FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RFSULTS
dn individual vehicles in Detroit
VEH
NO ,
YR MAKE MODL ClU
TEST
TYPE
¦
•
X 1
<-> i
•
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
m m m m m
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
141
69 OLDS 90 455
COLD
TRANS
4.15
«4.1
803,4
6,47
10,0
COLD
STAB
2.93
34.3
728,2
5,85
11.2
IHCL
2190PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
2.29
19.b
b54,7
7.76
12. b
IHCG
210PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
2.55
22.3
718,9
5,95
11.6
ICOI.
1,6 % CD
1 C f1G
1 .5 X CO
1972
FTP
3.55
39.1
764,8
6,15
10.6
1975
FTP
3.01
32.3
723,6
6.51
11.3
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
2.42
21,0
687.7
6.83
12.2
NONE
HFE T
1.36
7.2
529. 1
1 0. 39
16.3
142
69 PLYM FURY 318
COLD
TRANS
8,06
21,6
402,1
6,34
19.2
COLD
STAB
8.61
22,9
378,7
5,26
20, I
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
6,19
13,3
347,7
7.27
22,9
IHCG
1000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
7.65
22.0
380,3
5.18
20.2
I COL
5,2 * CO
ICPG
7.4 X CO
1972
FTP
8,34
22,3
390. 1
5.79
19.7
1975
FTP
7,82
20,0
375,0
6,05
20.6
OTHER
TESTS!
H(JT
START
6,94
17,8
364,4
6.19
21.4
LOADED
HFfcT
2,74
6,1
307,3
8.20
27,3
143
69 PONT TEMP 350
COLD
TRAMS
7,42
135,0
597. 1
5.63
10.7
COLD
STAB
7,94
181.1
581 .4
3.58
10.0
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.29
115.5
505.4
5.11
12.6
IHCG
86SPPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
8.34
193.6
52*.9
3.13
10.3
I COL
5,2 X CO
ICOG
6,4 X CO
1972
FTP
7,69
158.7
589. 0
4.58
10.3
1975
FTP
7.37
153.3
563.6
4.44
10.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
7,34
155.6
517.5
4.10
11.3
NONE
HF-ET
4,09
77.2
400.2
4.40
1 h , 6
144
69 PONT CATA 400
COLL'
TRAvJS
4,44
63,8
686, 1
7.40
11.1
COLD
STAB
3,88
41.2
65 S.O
6.76
12.2
IHCL
2050PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3,17
29,3
58H.7
8,38
13.8
IHCG
255PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.73
36,2
648, 4
6.65
12,4
I COL
0.8 X CO
ICOG
1.6 * CO
1972
FTP
«.15
52.2
669. 1
7.07
11,6
1975
FTP
3.80
42.6
642. 1
7.34
12, S
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.46
32.8
619.4
7 . 49
13.0
A/C
HE t T
1 .96
11.7
496.5
9.38
17.0
HlfL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 rARBON:HYDROGEN
RATIO
jo
-------
APPEND I X C fCONiT ' D
LISTING OF FEDERAL Tt ST PROCEDURE RESULTS
on Individual vehicles in Detroit
VEH
NO,
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
1
1 LJ
1 X
1
1
GRAMS
co
PER MILE
CO?
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
1
-------
APPENDIX CfCOM'D
LISTING flF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
nN individual vehicles in Detroit
VEh
NO,
YR MAKF MnnL CIO
TEST
TYPF
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
m m m m m
Nil XC
MPG
FUEL
V CON
l 49
68 CHEV MALI 230
CflLO
trans
1 0,68
101.2
479,0
5.88
13.2
COLD
STAR
3.73
"3.7
566.7
5.95
13.7
THCL
15c)2ppm CARBON
HOT
trans
3.21
23. 1
621,4
A.84
13.3
IHCG
160PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAR
6. IS
40.7
627.3
7.86
12.3
ICOL
0.1 X CO
icnr,
0.1 X CH
1972
F TP
7.11
71.7
524,0
5.91
13.5
1975
FTP
5.OU
50.0
56 3.6
6.7*
13.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4.72
56.2
6 24.5
8.33
12.7
NONE
HFET
1.58
15.3
371.6
6.83
22.2
150
68 CHEV IMPA 307
COLD
trans
8.3?
124.7
591 .9
5.47
10.9
COLD
STAB
6.1 1
64.6
575.0
6, 0 6
12.8
1 HC L
6770PPM CARBflN
HOT
TRANS
5.17
70.6
547 . 0
6.53
13.2
IHCG
705PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.80
67.7
560.7
5.93
12.9
ICOL
5.2 x cn
ICOG
7.6 % CO
1972
FTP
7.19
93.8
583.2
5.77
11.8
1975
FTP
6.31
78.8
570 .8
6.07
12.4
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.49
69. 1
554. 1
6.22
13.1
loaded
HFET
2.82
25.6
471.8
6.60
17.0
151
6fl CHEV IMPA 327
COLD
THAWS
76.28
330. 1
461.8
1.01
7.3
COLD
STAB
77.79
229.2
505. 1
1.33
8,0
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
55.43
132.5
444 .1
2.25
10.7
IHCG
200OPP* HEXANE
HO T
STAB
71 .78
162.5
548. 1
2.31
8, 6
ICOL
o.i % cn
ICOG
o.2 y. cn
1972
FTP
77.05
278. 3
484 ,0
1 .17
7.6
1975
FTP
71.27
223,5
4 79 ,1
1 .52
8.4
OTHER
TESTS:
MOT
START
63.82
147.9
497 .5
2.28
9.5
LOADED
HFET
45.03
74.5
426.6
2.90
12.9
152
68 C^EV MALI 327
COLD
trans
6.52
H3.2
574 ,6
3.22
12.2
COLD
star
4 .65
61 .7
553.4
2.15
13. 5
1 HC L
1443PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
4.03
44.9
477 .9
3.06
15.8
IHCG
160PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.59
66. 1
549,0
2.08
13.5
ICOL
0.9 X CO
ICOG
0.8 X CO
1972
FTP
5.56
72.2
563.7
2.67
12.8
1975
FTP
4,87
61.5
536.9
2.63
13.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
«.32
55.8
514.4
2.56
14,4
NONE
HFET
2.88
34.5
369. 1
2.81
20.5
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 CARBON:HYDROGEN
WAT IU
d-j
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLFS IN DETROIT
MPG
VEH -GRAMS PER MILE-- FUEL
NU.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NO X C
ECON
153
60 CHEV MALI 327
COLD
TRANS
9.31
162.5
496.2
3.00
11.4
COLD
STAB
8.96
165.1
512.1
1 .89
11.1
IHCL
6670PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.12
111.8
459. 4
3.33
13.5
IHCG
495PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
0.47
160.0
<497.0
1.80
11.4
I COL
5.2 X en
I COG
4.1 X CLl
1972
FTP
9.13
163.8
504,4
2.«3
11.2
1975
FTP
8.52
149.0
494.2
2.52
1U7
OTHER
TESTS:
HUT
START
7,82
136.5
478.7
2.54
12.4
NONE
HFE T
3.81
71.5
387.7
3.97
17.3
154
toft DODG POLA 383
COLD
TRANS
25.54
375.7
496.1
2.24
/. 6
COLD
STAB
8.45
140.5
609.8
6.48
10.4
IHCL
7566PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
6.12
85.2
577,8
9.19
12.1
IHCG
440PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8.21
145.8
584.7
5.66
10. h
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
6.5 X CO
1972
FTP
16.77
255.0
554.5
a.42
8,0
1975
FTP
1 1 .38
174.4
577.1
6.35
10.0
OTHER
TESTSl
HOT
START
7.20
116.3
581. 3
7.38
11.3
LOADED
HFET
3.49
37.3
505.7
9.16
15.4
155
60 FORD FAIR 200
COLD
TRANS
7,03
120.2
440.7
6.52
13.2
COLD
STAB
4.07
31.4
541.7
11 .05
14.7
IHCL
3404PPM CAPBOM
HOT
TRANS
3.34
2«.l
471.1
1 1.77
17.1
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.72
33.8
520.5
10.09
15.0
ICOL
1.4 * CO
ICOG
2.2 X CO
1972
FTP
5.51
78.5
496,4
0.05
13.9
1975
FTP
4.48
49.6
502.6
10,30
14.9
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
3.55
29.1
500,6
10.91
1^.9
NONE
HFET
2.26
13.5
413,6
13.42
20. 1
156
60 FORD MUST 289
COLD
TRANS
6.48
56.6
542.8
8.98
13.6
COLD
STAB
7.34
83,8
504. 7
6.59
13.5
I HC I
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.90
4 1.6
468.8
9.41
16.1
IHCG
590PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAR
6.61
82,7
491 .9
6.99
13.0
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
6.5 X CO
1972
FTP
6.92
70.6
523.2
7.75
13.5
1975
F TP
6,40
66.4
502.7
7.87
14.1
OTHFP
TFSTS!
HOT
START
5.78
62.7
480. 7
8.17
14,9
NONE
HFE T
2.30
0.9
410.2
9,40
20.6
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.05 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
^33
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING riF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
IN DETROIT
MPG
VFH
m m m m «|
grams i
R MILE
.....
FUFL
Nil.
YR makF MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
cn
C02
NO X C
EC ON
1 S7
68 FORD GALA 302
COL D
TRANS
5.78
71.1
598.9
7,21
12.1
COLO
S T A 8
3.31
51.9
633,1
5,65
12.2
THCL
1261PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
3.51
59.9
5H.2
6,15
13,7
iHcr,
1 1 5PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
3.26
5^.1
628.9
5.66
12,3
I COL
1.0 X CM
I COG
o,9 x en
1972
FTP
1.53
62.8
616.6
6.11
12,2
1975
FTP
3.91
58.8
601.1
6.20
12,6
1 IT HJ£ W
TESTS!
Hf J T
START
3.10
57.0
587,7
6.05
12,9
NUNE
HFET
2.07
21.3
111,8
6.56
19,6
158
68 FI1RD TORI 390
COLD
TRAnS
1.99
'¦16.9
611,1
6.06
12. 1
COLO
STAB
1. 98
n. 5
583,0
1.07
12.5
I HCL
3385PPM CARHON
HOT
TRANS
4.02
n. 1
531,5
5.77
H.l
IHCG
130PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.03
67,6
565,a
3.96
12.9
I COL
2.5 X CO
I COG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
a.98
59.5
612,9
5.05
12.3
1975
FTP
a.72
58. 7
582,1
1.96
12.9
OTHER
TFSTSJ
HOT
START
1.51
56.2
550.1
1.81
13.6
LOADED
HFfc T
2.99
32.3
160.1
5.31
17.0
15"
68 MERC ClMJG 302
COLD
TRANS
1.83
58. 1
53o,2
7.67
M.H
COLD
STAB
3.60
51.5
b 0 1 , 6
7.19
12.7
I Hf L
110OPPM CARBON
HOT
TWANS
3.60
21.6
523.7
9.09
15.5
IHCG
320PPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
3.55
16.a
587.7
7.61
13.2
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
1.2 X Cn
1972
F TP
a.20
51.7
570.1
7.58
13.3
1975
FTP
3.86
15.1
567,1
7,97
13.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
3.57
35.8
556,5
8.31
11.2
LOADED
HFE T
1.87
7.1
139, 1
7.79
19.1
160
68 ULDS CUTl 450
COLD
TRANS
7.10
95.3
MO.3
6.79
11.3
COLD
STAB
7,76
59.2
630.1
7.03
11.9
IHCL
5177PPM CARBON
HUT
TRANS
5.58
37.1
570,a
7.93
13.7
IHCG
650PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
7.39
65.6
632.8
6.59
11.7
ICOL
1.8 X CO
ICOG
3.6 X CO
1972
F TP
7.59
76.8
620,1
6.92
11.6
1975
FTP
7.08
60.6
609,a
7.23
12.2
OThER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
6,51
51.7
602,1
7.21
12.6
NONE
HFET
2.66
28.2
158,2
6.70
17.1
FUFL FffiNQMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 C A RB( IN : H Y DROGEN RAT If)
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING (IF FEDERAL TEST PROCFDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
N(l.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEl
ECON
161
68 PLYM BE L V 316
COLD
TRANS
<1.70
39.4
589. 1
10.22
13.3
COLD
STAB
a.06
21.0
629.0
12.15
13.1
IHCL
134<4PPM CARBON
HOT
TPANS
3.14
10,7
568.7
12.47
14.9
IHCG
200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.94
15.3
637.2
13,11
13.2
ICOL
0.3 X CO
ICOG
0.9 X CO
1972
FTP
1.37
30.0
609.6
1 1.21
13,?
1975
FTP
3.94
22.0
6 0 4.0
11.83
13.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3.55
13.1
603.9
12.80
14.0
NONE
HFET
2.06
6.0
424.7
12.80
20. 1
162
68 PONT H LI N N 400
COLD
TRANS
6.49
37.3
680.0
7.57
11.7
COLD
STAB
ft.08
35,1
644,3
7,31
12.2
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5,32
22.7
578,3
8.96
14,1
IHCG
1100PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
8,44
30.8
631.5
7.91
12,6
ICOL
2.9 X CO
ICOG
2,4 X CO
197?
FTP
7.30
36.2
661 .7
7.44
12.0
1975
FTP
6.98
32.1
633.4
7.82
12.6
OTHER
tests:
HOT
START
6.92
26.9
605.6
8.42
13.3
NONE
HFET
2.0*
6.4
482.7
9.02
17.8
163
68 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
6.1 7
59.1
295.3
2.60
21.8
COLD
STAB
6.31
51.6
353.5
2.05
19.5
IHCL
1595PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.33
46.1
301. 1
3.04
22.9
IHCG
75PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6.21
53.1
377,3
2.62
18.5
ICOL
2.2 X CO
ICOG
1.0 X CO
1972
FTP
6,24
55.3
325,2
2.32
20.6
1975
FTP
5,73
51,7
326,8
2.44
20,8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5,30
49.7
340,2
2.82
20.4
NOME
HFET
2,05
26. 1
234.7
2.90
31.4
164
67 AMMO AMBA 232
COLO
TRANS
6,61
105,1
583,8
9.29
u.s
COLD
STAB
4.23
96.4
523. 1
6.36
12.9
IHCL
6172PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.49
76,7
516.2
8.70
13,7
IHCG
435PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4,39
99,0
513,0
6.06
13,0
ICOL
5,2 * CO
ICOG
5,2 X CO
1972
FTP
5,39
100,6
552,6
7,79
12,2
1975
FTP
4,52
92,8
533,9
7.62
12.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
3,95
88,2
514.5
7.34
13,3
NONE
HFET
2.42
37.6
481 .7
11.80
16.2
FUF.L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHfJN: HYDROGEN RATIO
2 b
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
on individual vehicles in Detroit
mpg
VEH —---GRAMS PER MILE FUEL
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC ECON
US
67 RUIC LESA 340
COLD
TRANS
10.74
152. 1
555
6
4.94
10,7
COLD
STAB
12,08
157.3
474
9
2.26
11.7
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
8.80
124.4
463
2
a. 12
12.9
IHCG
15H0PPM HEXANF
HOT
STAB
11.17
160.4
463
7
1 .98
11.8
I COL
5.2 X CU
ICOG
6.9 X CO
1972
FTP
11.^3
154.8
51"
2
3.56
1 1.2
1975
E TP
10,89
147.1
488
5
3.34
11.8
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
10.02
142.9
463
5
3.02
12.3
LOADED
HFET
4,47
95.8
387
1
u.oi
16,1
1 hfe
67 CADI DEVI 429
COLD
TRANS
7.83
143.5
661
2
5.23
9.7
COLD
STAB
7.37
141.4
578
9
2.86
10.8
IHCL
? 6 8 8 P P M CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4 ,84
91.0
525
3
4.54
13.0
IHCG
300PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,70
143.1
627
7
3.33
10.2
ICOL
2.9 x en
ICOG
2.6 X CO
1972
FTP
7.59
142.4
619
0
4.01
10.2
1975
FTP
6.76
127.9
581
3
3.82
11.0
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
S T A R T
5.79
117.8
577
8
3.92
11.4
LOADED
HFE.T
3.61
52.1
504
6
6.29
14.8
167
67 CHEV CAMA 250
COLD
TRANS
9.51
129.0
413
9
5.20
13.7
COLD
STAB
12.30
8 4. 7
403
9
5.17
15.4
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
7.07
68.7
373
3
6.03
1 /.6
IHCG
1800PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
13.80
88,0
589
6
4.95
15.5
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
6.4 * CO
1972
FTP
10,94
1 06.3
408
8
5.18
14.5
1975
FTP
10.27
89.5
597
5
5.41
15.5
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
10.52
78,6
381
7
5.48
16.5
NONE.
HFF.T
2.76
29.9
323
6
6.01
23.4
168
67 CHEV IMPA 283
COLD
TRANS
13.70
1 34.8
570
3
5.80
10.8
COLD
STAB
10.41
121.1
542
8
1.23
11.6
IHCL
9458PPM CARHON
HOT
TRANS
8.38
99.5
521
6
5.50
12.6
IHCG
600PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10.61
124.3
557
1
«.37
11.3
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
a.6 X CO
1972
FTP
12.0 1
127.8
556
2
4.99
11.2
1975
FTP
10.54
118.0
542
7
4.91
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
9.53
112.3
539
9
4.92
11. 9
NONE
HFfc T
5.67
77.5
443
0
5.60
15.2
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A l!t.85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
-Jbo
-------
APPENDIX C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS
CO
PER MILE
C02
NOXC
MPG
FUEL
econ
169
67 CHEV IMPA 283
COLD
TRANS
9.63
117.3
568. 4
4.49
lt.3
COLD
STAR
8.55
116.7
526. 1
2.93
12.0
IHCL
8661 PPM CARBON
HOT
TRAnS
6.75
95.6
480,9
4.01
13.6
IHCG
51SPPM HFXANE
HOT
STAB
8,28
116.0
503.2
2.70
12.5
ICGL
S.2 * CO
ICOG
a.8 % CO
1972
FTP
9.08
117.0
546.7
3.69
11.7
1975
FTP
8.28
111.0
522.a
3.55
12. 3
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
7.53
106.1
492.3
3.34
13.0
LOADED
HFET
4.24
64.0
409.6
4. 48
16.9
1 70
67 CHEV STAW 327
COLD
TRANS
16.16
107.0
583.6
5.72
11.1
COLD
STAB
24.89
130.6
495.9
3.09
11.«
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
13.55
94.9
507.7
5.18
12.7
IHCG
2200PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
22.3 6
1 30.8
493. 1
3.12
11.5
I COL
5.2 % CO
ICOG
8,8 X CO
1972
FTP
20,64
119. 1
538,6
0.37
11.2
1975
FTP
19.92
115.8
517.5
4.22
1 1.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
18.07
113.3
500.2
«.13
12.1
LOADED
HFET
6.51
64. 1
462.4
5.14
15.2
171
67 CHRY NEWP 383
COLD
TRANS
14,59
352.4
604,3
1.23
7.4
COLD
STA0
6.01
167. 1
666,4
1.38
9,4
IHCL
2488PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.47
102.0
633,1
3.33
11,0
IHCG
345PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
4.03
74.8
707,3
2.70
10,6
ICOL
0.3 X CO
ICOG
0.4 X CO
1972
FTP
10.19
257.3
636,2
1.31
6.3
1975
FTP
7.38
187.8
644.2
1 .89
9,2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
STAPT
4,25
88.0
671 .2
3,01
10,8
LOADFP
HFET
2.36
59.3
511.6
3,47
14.5
172
67 DODG MONA 38 3
COLD
TRANS
13,40
133,0
627,1
5,74
10.1
COLD
STAB
6,03
69,0
626, 1
6,43
11.8
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.23
53.5
565,5
6,65
13.3
IHCG
680PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5,87
62, 1
609,2
5,94
12.2
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
4.6 X CO
1972
FTP
9.62
100,6
626,6
6,09
10.9
1975
FTP
7.35
78,5
609,5
6,35
11.7
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.56
57,9
587,9
6,29
12.7
NONE
HFET
2.76
28,2
471 ,3
6.35
16.9
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
257
-------
APPEND I X C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TFST procedure RESULTS
On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
V EH
NO,
YR M A K f- MODI. CID
TEST
TYPE
i
i i_j
1 X
i
i
r,RAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
w m mm m m
NI1XC
MPG
FUEL
Y CON
173
67 FORD GALA 289
COLD
TRANS
12.5a
230.a
080.5
1 .82
10.1
COLD
STAB
11 .32
300.7
U56.3
0 . 90
9.2
IHCL
6371 PPM CARbON
HOT
TRANS
10.19
218,1
015.3
1.39
11.2
IHCG
oooppm hexane
HOT
STAB
10.27
270.2
006.8
0.86
9.8
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
6,2 X CO
1972
FTP
11.92
266,5
068. J
1.37
9.6
1975
FTP
1 1 .26
263. 1
050.0
1 .25
9.9
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
10.23
200. 9
031.5
1.12
10.5
NONE
HFET
5.56
127.0
356,0
2.09
15.5
170
67 FORD GALA 289
COLD
TRANS
7,78
93.7
077.0
7.07
13.7
COLD
STAB
6.60
171.8
538.3
0.36
10.7
IHCL
0977PPM CARBON
HOT
trans
6.15
113.6
059.5
5.09
13.S
I HCG
O00PPM HEXANf-
HOT
STAH
6.0 1
175.0
567.2
0.90
10.3
ICOL
5.2 * CO
ICOG
6.6 X CO
1972
(¦ TP
7.,18
133.8
508.5
5.68
o
•
r\j
1975
FTP
6.7 3
139.3
503.6
5.20
11.9
OTHER
tfsts:
HOT
STAWT
6.29
105.2
510.8
5.19
1 1.6
loaded
HFh T
3.22
60.3
385.7
5.67
17.9
175
67 FORD GALA 390
COLD
TRANS
5.51
61.2
711.5
6.95
10.8
COLD
STAB
3.07
62.6
717.2
3.63
10.7
I HCL
2 5 3 8 P P M CARBON
HOT
TRANS
0.22
51.7
629, n
6.30
12.3
I HCG
235PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
3.02
62. 1
735.5
3.99
10.5
I ecu.
3.2 X CO
ICOG
2.0 * CO
1972
FTP
0.06
61.9
710.0
5.20
10.7
1975
FTP
0.10
59.3
691 .h
5.06
11.1
OTHER
TFSTS?
HOT
START
3.81
57. 1
683,7
5.11
11.3
NONf
HFfcT
2.51
06,0
089.9
5.20
15.6
176
67 MERC MONT 390
COLD
TRANS
10.03
85.3
770.1
7.20
9.3
COLD
STAB
15.19
83.2
666.0
7.00
10.5
IHCL
9906PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
10.03
62.6
631,6
7.76
11.7
IHCG
1680PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
10.19
77. 1
669.6
7.52
10.6
ICOL
5.1 X cn
ICOG
3.5 X CO
1972
FTP
10,62
80.2
718,8
7.30
9.9
1975
ftp
13.51
77.9
679,3
7.09
10.5
OTHER
TFSTS:
HOT
START
12.17
70.0
651 . 1
7.63
11.1
NONF
HFfc T
5.09
39.9
535.3
7.20
10.0
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 J 1.85 CARHON!HYPwOGhN RATIO
d'-i o
-------
APPEND I * C,CONT'D
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS
ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES IN DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
GRAMS 1
CO
PER MILE
C02
• • m • m
NfJXC
MPG
FUEL
ECON
177
#>7 OLDS CUTL 330
COLD
TRANS
15.90
226.2
544,2
2.83
9.3
COLD
STAB
7.33
150.3
556.6
1 .9K
10.9
IHCL
8462PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
5.^7
109.8
496.5
3.44
12.9
IHCG
515PPM HEXANE
HUT
STAB
7.11
150.6
534,4
1 .73
11.2
I COL
S. 2 X CO
ICOG
5.5 * CO
1972
FTP
11.50
187.2
550,6
2.39
10,1
1975
FTP
8.61
15a.9
537.3
2.56
11.0
I1THER
TESTS!
HOT
START
6.31
130.7
516.0
2.56
12,0
NONE
HFET
4, 58
124.5
389.9
2.10
14.8
178
67 PLVM HARR 225
COLD
TRANS
31.91
151.1
379.0
2.91
12.4
COLD
STAB
20.33
114.a
375.2
3.21
14.3
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
20.65
108.0
340.0
3.05
15.4
IHCG
2000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
24.43
131.8
353.3
2.56
13.9
1COL
3.7 X CO
ICOG
4.2 X CO
1972
FTP
25.97
132.2
377,1
3.07
13.3
1975
FTP
22.84
120.3
366.2
3.10
14.1
OTHER
TESTS!
HOT
START
22.59
120.2
346,8
2,80
14,6
NONE
HFET
13.57
57.2
313.6
4.27
19.9
179
67 PONT VENT 400
COLD
TRANS
25.96
162.5
586.8
6.63
9.6
COLD
STAB
5.19
78.1
635.4
6.93
11.5
IHCL
4480PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
3.89
46.7
551 .1
8.78
li.9
IHCG
365PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
5.12
74.7
627.9
7.64
11.7
I COL
3.7 X CO
ICOG
3.1 X CO
1972
FTP
15.30
119.2
611.7
6.78
10.5
1975
FTP
9,18
S7.1
601 .8
7.38
1 1.6
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
4,52
61.1
590,5
8.20
12.7
NONE
HFET
2.13
27.2
428,7
8.89
18.6
180
67 VOLK SEDA 91
COLD
TRANS
6.43
75.7
335.5
7.65
18.7
COLD
STAB
7.35
75.2
319,4
4,14
19.3
IHCL
9946PPM CARBON
HOT
TRANS
4.14
53.3
275.9
5.11
23.8
IHCG
2000PPM HEXANE
HOT
STAB
6,76
73.3
313.5
3.73
19.7
ICOL
5.2 X CO
ICOG
5.8 X CO
1972
FTP
6,90
75.5
327.2
5,85
19,0
1975
FTP
6,27
69.3
310.7
5.14
20.2
OTHER
TESTS:
HOT
START
5.48
63,6
295.2
4,40
21.5
.NONE
HFET
1.72
34.1
225.1
4.52
31.2
FUEL
ECONOMY CALCULATIONS
ASSUME
A 1:1.
85 carbon:hydrO(;en
RATIO
25V
-------
Appendix D - Listing of Modal Results on Individual Vehicles
Legend
VEH - Vehicle riumber
YEAR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
MODE NO, - Lists the Individual Modes of the Test
1 through 32 - Modes of the Surveillance Driving Sequence (SDS),
listed on the following page
SIP! - A composite of the SDS and the Steady State results
BAC - Results of the entire SDS as measured using the CVS.
33 - Idle mode
34 - 5 MPH Steady State
35 - 10 MPH Steady State
36 - 15 MPH Steady State
37 - 30 MPH Steady State
38 - 45 MPH Steady State
39 - 60 MPH Steady State
JIC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
WOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions in grams per mile
MPG - Fuel Econony in miles per gallon, Calculated Using the Carbon
Balance Method.
260
-------
SURVEILLANCE DRIVING SEQUENCE
Mode
Average Accel-
Uo
Speed Range
Time In Mode
Average Speed
eration Rate
Distant
(mph)
(sec)
(mph)
(mph/sec)
(mllet
1
Accel
0-30
12
18.05
2.50
0.0602
2
Decel
30-0
16
16.66
-1.88
0.0741
3
Accel
0-15
8
9.04
1.88
0.0201
4
Accel
15-30
11
23.07
1.36
0.0705
5
Accel
30-45
13
37.65
1.15
0.1360
6
Decel
45-30
12
38.05
-1.25
0.1268
7
Accel
30-60
17
45.80
1.76
012163
8
Decel
60-45
12
51.48
-1.25
0.1716
9
Accel
45-60
14
52.54
1.07
0.2043
10
Decel
60-15
30
40.40
-1.50
0.3367
11
Accel
15-60
26
43.42
1.73
0.3136
12
Decel
60-0
21
33.83
-2.86
0.1973
13
Accel
0-60
32
37.27
1.88
0.3313
14
Decel
60-30
23
46.86
-1.30
0.2994
15
Decel
30-15
9
23.18
-1.67
0.0579
16
Decel
15-0
8
7.81
-1.88
0.0173
17
Accel
0-45
22
28.85
2.05
0.1759
18
Decel
45-15
16
31.33
-1.88
0.1302
19
Accel
15-45
18
30.55
1.67
0.1528
20
Decel
45-0
19
24.72
-2.37
0.1304
21
Accel
0-60
25
38.28
2.40
0.2654
22
Decel
60-0
28
33.88
-2.14
0.2634
23
Accel
0-30
15
17.73
2.00
0.0737
24
Accel
30-60
25
45.14
1.20
0.3134
25
Decel
60-30
18
47.23
-1.67
0.2362
26
Decel
30-0
10
15.99
-3.00
0.0444
27
Accel
0-60
38
38.01
1.58
0.4009
28
Decel
60-0
35
33.87
-1.71
0.3293
29
Accel
0-30
18
17.73
1.67
0.0886
30
Accel
30-60
21
44.55
1.43
0.2599
31
Decel
60-30
14
46.63
-2.14
0.1813
32
Decel
30-0
13
16.40
-2.31
0.0592
261
-------
APPENDIX D
LISTING (IF MURAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES
DFNVFR
VFh
YF AR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
00 1
1 97(1
HUIC
R I V I
155
MOOF
Nil.
HC
en
CO 2
NHX
MPG
1
5.60
99.8
815.2
1 .06
9.0
2
1.61
90.9
955.6
1 .06
8.0
4
7 .09
98.6
1350.1
1 .16
5.8
u
2.90
11.3
801.9
1.21
10.0
5
2.16
61.8
682.7
1.32
11.?
6
2.02
15.9
631.1
1 .06
12.5
7
1.73
187.9
615.1
1 .79
9.6
8
2.82
101.3
660,6
2.18
10.6
9
1 . 36
160.2
611.7
1 .33
10.1
10
2.96
91.3
691.6
1 .68
10.5
1 1
6.85
112. 7
601.1
0.93
7.6
12
1.J8
1 67.7
859. 1
1 .82
7.B
13
7.13
151.1
718.6
1.11
6.8
11
<.16
116.9
625.1
1.15
10.8
15
1.21
60.5
716.5
0.92
10.8
16
8.23
92,9
1511.1
1 .58
5.2
17
1.26
1 65.1
639.7
0.91
9.7
18
4.21
111.1
751.1
1.10
9.1
19
3.73
1 36. 1
607.7
0.81
10.7
20
u. nu
150.2
878.5
1.11
7.9
21
7.19
158.8
631.5
1.10
7.3
22
5.13
179.0
731.9
1.31
8.6
23
6.12
160.1
1058.8
1.52
6.7
21
1.86
257.0
55B.0
0.69
9.1
25
3.6R
153.7
615.1
1.17
10.2
26
6 .61
119.9
1003,1
1 .23
7.1
27
5.02
219,1
672.3
0.93
8.?
28
3.51
110.8
722.8
1.23
9.8
29
/I. 98
125.6
986.0
1.27
7.1
30
h.ll
291.0
515.6
0.68
8.6
11
1 .09
183.1
639.5
1 .06
9.1
32
6.86
1 52.1
971 .8
1 .09
7.2
VtH YEAR MAKE MODL CIO
002 1971 C Ht V C A HP 000
VEH YFAW MAKE MODL CID
OOJ 1971 CHFv NIIVA 350
HC
Co
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
CU2
NOX
MP|,
5.12 111.6 627,7
U,<19 81 .2 761 ,7
6.93 70,1 1120,«
3.16 50.8 632.1
3.01 66.5 *>52.8
2,38 37.0 522.9
1.00 131,1 523.3
2.93 81.6 571,2
3.95 1 33.1 521.2
3.18 59.5 551.0
5,<46 239.9 528.3
1,70 120,9 661,5
6.18 272.2 579.3
3.08 88.2 511.5
1,51 13.0 576.0
7,22 71.9 1216.6
3,97 111,9 518.9
1.17 121,3 602,6
3.01 1U8.A
1.81 103.9
5.19 298.S
1.11 139.8
5.61 113.7
1.11 212.9
5.21 110.8
5.18 82.1
5.21 235.1
3,61 107.6
5.01 121,6
5,00 256.0
515.5
660. 1
526.2
635.9
790.6
187, 1
501.3
816.0
515.3
551.0
766.8
501.7
1.56 139.7 501.3
1.92 100.h 795.6
2,16 10.8
1.16 9.8
2.16 7,1
2.25 12.1
2.81 11.1
1.51 15.1
1.12 11.9
3.01 12.5
2.15 11.9
2.11 13.6
1.16 9.6
2,27 10.2
1.65 8.6
1.61 13.1
0.87 13.6
1.11 6.1
1 .38 12.0
1 .21 11.0
I .22 11.3
1 .26 10,6
1.15 H.0
1 .62 10.2
2.20 9.0
1.07 10,6
1.17 12.9
1.16 9,2
1.31 9.5
1.15 12.1
1.81 9.1
0.97 9.h
1.21 12.1
0.9H 9.2
13.11 276.1
11.39 325.1
22,65 392.5
9.28 251.2
5.38 191.1
5.01 117.6
5.91 255.5
6.73 215.1
1.58 165,5
10.80 118,9
6.98 315.1
12.62 232,3
11.15 381,1
6.92 190, <1
16.11 |8«. 1
35.70 uou.8
10.63 199.1
7.75 231.9
9.33 237.6
9.10 257.9
10.51 317.9
8,80 217.6
16.97 255.J
5.10 162.1
1.72 139.8
16.85 230. }
8.60 280.4
7,00 176.8
15.68 215.8
7.19 219.J
6.56 223.7
16.25 269.8
383.0
151. 1
666.9
385.1
370.7
313.6
371.6
360.fi
385.2
122. 1
380.9
176.8
121.8
368. 5
371.5
780.8
358.2
115.8
319.9
U75.7
391,5
153.7
515.7
106.9
U05.5
538.?
115.3
0 35,8
188.2
47 1.2
109.8
556.5
0.11 10.3
0.20 8.8
0.17 6.5
0.18 10.9
0.11 12.9
0.55 15.0
0.21 11,2
0.71 12,3
0.96 13.5
1.31 12.9
0.19 9.9
1.25 10,1
0.5? 8.1
0.91 12.9
0.56 12.5
1.11 5.6
0.35 12.6
0.51 11.0
0. 39 I 1 .H
0.65 9.8
0.35 9.1
n.95 10.2
0.76 9.|
0.92 IS.1
1 . 32 1 J.9
1.11 9.4
0.61 in.]
1.22 12.1
0.71 9.6
0,12 11,3
0,«9 |1,3
1.08 H,6
SUM 3.25 121.1
PAT, u.3« 178.u
675.7 1.21 10.1 3.09 101.2 558.2 1,91 12.1 6.95 183.1
706.9 1.18 8.9 1.12 160,8 591.2 1,86 10.3 8.61 210.7
115.1 0.94 12.2
<402, 0 0 . 70 1 1 .0
33
0 .59
1.0
119.5
0.09
69.5
0.69
7.1
101.1
0,17
75.3
3.13
31.1
16.9
o. 02
83.8
41
5.62
51.5
H39.1
0.89
5.8
5.95
56.2
1278.8
1 .59
6.1
16. 19
588. 7
810.5
0.19
1.7
35
2.15
21.3
831 .5
0.63
10.1
2.15
22,8
657. 1
0.72
12.7
15.69
129.5
16 1.6
0.29
8 . h
16
1.21
1 3.7
721.0
0.77
1 1 ."
l.H
28.2
576.8
0 .65
11.2
7.70
211.1
388 . 0
0.21
11.9
17
0 .90
7.2
586.9
0.55
11.8
1.21
16.5
115.3
0.58
18.7
2.16
65.3
181 .9
0.17
18,0
18
1.16
23.5
511.0
0.92
15.2
0.81
13,6
095.5
1 .85
17.1
2.75
77.3
193.6
0.87
16.9
39
0,9a
0 9,0
628.0
1.81
12.5
1 .23
18 . 0
531,9
3. 46
H.5
3.11
105.9
120 .1
1 .80
11.8
EMIbSI UN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PFR MINUTE FOR IDLE)
Flltl FCOMOmy IN Mil FS PFP GALLON (MINUTES PEW GALLON FOR IDLE)
FIIFL tfnNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARHON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
26
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS flN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH YHAR
ftOI 1970
MAKF MtlDL CID
DUDG DART 318
VEH YEAR
005 1971
MAKE MODL CID
FORD HAVE 302
VEH YEAR
0(16 1971
MAKE MMDL CID
FORD TORI 351
MODE
*<).
HC
CO
CM2
NO*
MP G
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
Hr
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
1.00
92.7
111 .5
1 .80
11,8
0.10
61.1
735.2
1.75
10.5
5.97
116.7
531, 7
1.22
12,0
2
1.72
1 38.3
562.0
1 .25
11.2
2.22
37,0
279. 1
0.77
25.7
5.35
97.8
610,6
1.27
11.1
3
7.60
1 71.6
830.3
1.29
7.9
5.25
118.5
901.5
1 .02
8.0
7.96
1 01.2
957.6
1.87
1.7
1
J.38
101.6
131.6
1.01
H.7
3.00
73.1
566.1
2.17
12.8
3.77
69.8
501 . 7
1.61
11.2
5
?.51
78.3
371.8
2.H
17.5
3.00
50.3
189.1
3.08
15.2
2.92
5B. 1
122.0
1 .81
17.0
6
2.53
60. 1
398.5
1.2«
17.7
1.71
15.6
133,6
0.12
50.3
2.68
16.8
396.5
1 .86
18.5
7
2.63
73.0
028.8
0.05
16. 1
0.52
182.7
618,3
3.19
9.7
1.05
121.7
123.1
2.27
11.1
8
2.52
15.9
187.6
2.91
15.6
2,80
22.0
161.6
0.17
13.2
3.11
91.0
035.0
1.15
15. 1
9
3.00
15.0
037.5
0.05
17.1
3.11
67.7
179.0
3.98
11.9
3.68
88.3
021.0
2.28
15.5
10
3.13
00,5
195,1
3.11
15,6
1,19
25.1
189,8
0.56
37.9
3.25
59.5
017.2
1.31
16. 1
1 1
3.05
61.1
172.2
5.38
15.0
0.88
93.2
598,5
5.09
11.7
1,78
1 86,9
150.0
1 ,89
11.7
1 2
4,08
53.1
612.6
3.93
12.5
2.60
29.9
191.8
0.55
35.9
1,10
91.9
567. 1
1 .70
12.2
13
3.68
75.0
538.5
5.10
13.3
6. 12
105.0
592.1
3.95
11.1
5,18
156.9
519.0
2.20
ll.i
11
2.98
05.9
156.1
2,80
16.5
1 .69
26.5
168.6
0.51
01.2
3.27
75.0
126.5
1 .28
16.0
15
0.92
81.6
107.2
1.33
11.9
1 .96
21,9
208,3
0,11
35.7
1.01
66.0
137,5
0,81
16,0
1 6
9.65
152.0
961.7
1 .60
7.2
5.29
61.1
532.7
0.81
13.7
8.97
1 06.1
907 .5
1.19
7.6
1 7
3.20
80.8
389.5
2.86
16.9
5.31
97.9
601.5
3.92
11.0
1.32
1 37.3
056.0
1.11
12.9
18
3.17
86,6
503.2
1.33
13.7
1.17
22.7
201 .0
0.52
36,7
3,60
79.3
050. 3
1.7ft
15.0
19
2.87
73.5
356.0
2.23
18.5
5,06
91.0
511.9
3.21
13.2
3.83
106.1
378.8
1.19
15.9
20
3.90
103.5
601 .1
1.18
11.0
1.87
28.8
219.7
0.65
32.8
1. 31
106. J
5H .7
1 .51
12.3
21
3.63
128.5
523.8
0,00
12.0
6,11
112.9
625.6
3.B5
10,8
5.22
213.8
170.0
1 .59
10.8
22
3.87
72.6
531 .8
2.65
13.5
1.90
25.1
190.2
0.60
37.0
1.56
118.7
538.2
1.12
12.0
23
5,19
111.9
658,1
2.21
io.o
1.66
98,0
696.0
2.95
10.2
6,02
138,2
651 .7
1.62
10.0
21
2.76
77.6
030.5
3.50
15.8
1. 70
72.3
151.6
3.17
15.2
3.50
113.3
127.1
1 .68
11.1
25
2.88
52.9
116,7
2.71
16.5
2. 16
21,0
163,3
0.03
12.7
3.18
60,8
103.8
0.H6
16,1
26
6.69
131.0
630.3
1.82
10.1
3. 10
35.3
320 .7
0.60
23.0
6.57
1 12.6
598.2
1.37
11.2
27
S.22
87.0
506.0
1.16
13.6
0.50
101,5
503.2
3.01
13.1
1.65
151.6
089.6
1 .82
11.9
28
3.70
65.8
083.2
2.50
H.8
1.80
28.1
186.3
0.60
37.6
3,86
86. 1
051 .2
1 .05
11.6
29
5.21
132.3
587.2
1.60
10.9
5.13
90,6
659.1
2.30
10.9
5.52
111.1
609. 7
1 .20
10.1
30
2.88
89.1
027,8
3.07
15.1
1,96
105,2
270,2
2.79
19.7
1,11
169,H
0 19,8
l.H
12.7
31
2.99
59.9
071 .5
2.76
15.1
2.91
20.1
123,9
0.61
53.9
3.57
103.0
021 .8
1.01
10.9
32
6.91
1 31.7
610.1
1.98
10.2
2.81
38.9
265,8
0.19
26.0
6.18
1 15,6
618.1
1.13
10.8
SUM
HAG
3.07
5.35
68.2
72.7
157. 1
198.2
3.19 15.5
3.09 14.2
2.98
3,63
55.6
65.9
360.7
100. 1
1.62 19.2
1.71 17.2
3.17 87.0
3.99 12 3.0
050.0 1.85 10.7
OR 7,9 1.18 12.8
13
0 .09
11.8
77.6
0,07
90,9
0.51
1.9
60.8
0.07
135
0,85
25.6
81.3
0.05
71.1
3«
6.09
181,2
90 3.5
0,52
7.3
6,83
56,6
863.6
0.82
9.1
7.33
118.5
11 OB.2
0,80
6.5
35
3.00
115,0
511,0
0,33
12.6
2.98
29,0
099,0
0.38
16.0
3.28
51.0
571.1
0.12
13.3
36
?. 31
86,0
390,2
0.29
16,6
3.02
61,1
310,9
0.22
21.3
1 .78
17.1
099.2
0.17
16.7
37
2.60
90.5
279.8
0.91
20.6
1 .87
27.9
282.2
0.10
26.7
1 .67
29. t
359. 1
0.93
21 .6
38
2.05
05.0
360.5
1.51
20.3
2.10
32.2
326.7
0.67
23.1
2.23
20,8
376.3
5.80
21.3
39
2.11
31.8
050,5
5,16
17.3
2.60
09,9
319,8
1.11
20.3
2,38
18,2
118.1
1.90
17.7
FMISSIQN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
HUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUFL FCMNdMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2b3
-------
APPENDIX D.CUNT'D
LISTING IIF modal RtSIILlS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLE
denvf w
VEh YEAR mAKE MIIDL CID
007 1971 IILDS CIJTL 3S0
VEH YEAR MAKF MOOL CID
0(18 I *571 PLYM SCAN 318
VFH YEAR MAKfc HfJDL CU
009 1971 PUNI TATA 100
HfinE
NO.
HC
en
CU2
NOX
MP(,
HC
cn
C02
Nil X
MPG
HC
CO
C02
mix
ppr,
1
7.16
2
5,85 ,
3
8.15 ,
u
1.50
5
1.17 ,
6
3.56
7
5.19 ,
8
1.17
0
5.25 ,
1 0
1.03
11
7.21 :
12
5.62
1 4
7.55 :
11
1.31
1 5
1.52
1 6
10,01 ;
1 7
7.00
18
5.69 ,
19
1.87 ,
20
6.68 ;
21
7.90
22
6.20
23
7 . 31 ,
21
5.76 ,
25
1.77
26
7.03
27
7.65 ;
28
5.22
29
6.85 1
30
6.21 .
31
1.71
32
6.98 :
435.5
150.5
5 51,3
569.9
197.1
005.2
367.5
131.1
"39,0
112.1
180. 3
115.7
920. 7
506.S
131.5
151.7
"35.2
151.1
il 1 .i
511. |
199.5
505. 1
700.0
395.3
«29.9
611.2
168.3
169. 7
769.6
uoo. a
167.0
525.8
0.23 *.5
0,10 9,1
0.16 6.2
0.13 11.1
0.53 12.0
0.16 15.2
1.50 10.7
0,83 13.1
0.85 11.5
1,19 13.5
0.82 8,7
1.17 7.5
0.7H 8,1
0.86 13.6
0,61 11.1
1,27 6.3
0,37 9.0
0.12 11.0
0.38 11,6
0,57 9.5
1.17 8.1
1.00 10.1
0.79 7.9
0.18 10.3
0.89 13.0
0.83 9.6
0.61 10.7
0.76 12.1
0.79 1,8
0.69 10.5
0.67 11,8
0.7 1 11.8
7.27 70.9
7.10 91.5
11.12 127.7
5,32 91.0
1.12 57.0
3.51 50.9
1.65 96.2
3.71 88.3
3.71 57.5
1.03 57.6
1.51 112.8
1.79 82.5
1.56 86.7
3.28 53.5
1.37 66.1
10.32 173.9
1.11 93.1
1.03 78.1
3,92 87.3
1,82 81.1
5.09 153.1
1.31 75.8
5.76 93.3
3.02 65.5
3.21
6,21
1,01
18.8
97.1
85. 1
3.83 51.3
5.51 98.1
3.72 78.8
3.52 61.3
6.35 100.6
553.1
602. 3
921 .5
191 ,1
102.0
388.7
113.1
119,3
116.2
151 .3
168.0
578.5
529.3
127.9
152.2
962.0
116.1
193.0
112.1
588.3
181 .2
530.6
676.6
13S.9
125.6
610.2
505. 3
178,5
623.5
115,2
118.8
650.5
2.13 12,9
1.87 11.5
2.05 7.7
1.61 13.5
2.91 17.6
1.55 18.5
2.51 15.3
1,91 15,6
3.57 17.1
2.36 16.0
5.85 13.5
3.50 12.3
5,21 13.1
2.63 17.0
1.16 15.6
2.17 7.0
2.99 11.6
2.15 11.1
2.65 15.8
2.39 12.1
2.89 12.0
3.09 13.1
2.53 10,5
3.72 16.1
3.00 17.3
2.51 10.9
3.98 13.6
3.27 15.1
2.00 11,2
3.37 15.3
3.19 15.8
2.83 10.7
5.71 121,1 619.3
5.58 117.9 639.6
9.26 226.7 10 10.3
1.13 1 I I.2 529.3
1.72 72.5 173.0
3.39 67.5 121.7
1.93 127.2 173.7
3,88 122,0 167.7
~.98 87.0 168.3
1.10 75,3 189.6
5.22 157. 7 SIS.2
5.59 137.9 633.3
5.58 Ibl.i 606.i
1.05 1 08.6 11 7. /
5.81 115,2 135.6
12,01 270,9 12«9. / . 6
6r>1.2
555. 3
192. 1
672.7
U95.6
191.9
668. 1
3.71 10.3
2,18 10.0
1.96 p.1
2.16 12.1
3.88 11.7
3.53 16.u
3.87 12.9
1.18 13,2
5.13 lu.i
5.18 iu.3
3.11 11.1
5.61 pl.
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
I I ST TNG OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
VEH YEAR
010 1974
MAKE MODL CID
VOLK SEDA 97
f)E NVEH
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
Oil 1Q7 3 A mm(1 GREm 23J
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
012 1073 RUIC CENT 350
Monf
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
<1.68
6.57
7.51
61,6
100,7
86, 1
224.2
234.5
355.7
1.17
0.96
1 .40
26.4
21.5
17.1
2.44
1.10
2.40
109.5
"».o
21.4
791.0
152.7
749.8
S.ll
0.59
2.61
9.1
52.1
11.2
<1.20
5.07
7.21
193.7
220.7
242.4
667,3
711.2
1151.6
1.26
1.21
1.76
9.0
8.3
5.7
o
5
b
3.90
2.91
2.07
65.5
<14,6
33.5
239.7
231.3
216.6
1.39
3.77
1 .86
25.0
28.6
32.2
1.27
1.48
1 .92
12.7
25.4
3.4
537.8
442.7
93.5
6.91
8,43
1 .28
15.8
18.2
60.7
2.79
2.32
2.33
112.0
138.5
112.3
573.1
491.5
482.5
1.06
1.16
1.41
11.7
12."
13.3
7
n
9
2.61
3,08
<1,09
45.0
70.2
73.8
226.5
215.6
211.2
2.64
1.44
2.04
29.0
26.4
26.1
3,09
3.21
2.21
232,9
4.0
130.2
650,7
129,1
414.1
4.09
2.37
5.89
8.6
61.0
14.2
4.42
4,69
4.23
277.2
258.3
240.1
427.4
480, 1
468, 3
0.73
1 ,66
1 .42
10,1
9.9
10.3
I n
II
12
5.21
5.10
3.88
59.8
68.9
89, 1
204.0
240.1
242.2
1 .46
2 ,63
1 .47
28.8
24.3
22.5
1.42
3.00
3.46
6.4
153.9
6.7
144,7
495,4
132,2
3.02
7.12
3.13
55.7
11.9
57.7
3.88
6.22
6.19
192. 1
340.9
310.2
563.5
46 3.3
678.2
2.5?
0.74
2.86
i n. i
8.7
7.5
1 i
14
15
<1,44
3,07
7.30
63,7
88.5
72.5
249,0
175.8
176.8
2.27
0.81
0.73
22.5
27.3
28.3
4.62
2.26
1.36
145,9
6.0
4.1
510.7
127,6
132.4
6.08
2.26
0.46
1 1.6
61.5
62.0
6,65
0.25
3.96
223.9
153.4
229.8
557.2
506.5
605.0
1.24
2.13
1.54
9.5
11.7
9.1
lb
17
if*
18.49
5.05
a, 14
149,7
62.3
81.7
353.9
197.0
242. 1
1.19
2.5?
1.27
13.7
28.5
23.1
3.33
2.91
1 .23
37.7
173.4
5.5
342.3
117,8
142,7
0.63
1 1 .88
1 .30
21.5
22.2
57.2
8.56
3.78
3.15
642.7
221.8
187.8
1550.2
540.8
575.9
2.05
1 .05
1.42
3.7
9.8
10,1
19
20
21
6,1?
4.35
4.20
64.3
b5,7
86.6
194,7
301 .2
249.0
2.16
1.61
1.83
28.2
21.2
22.3
4,49
1 .84
4,54
121.0
5.6
200.3
491 .9
157.2
620,2
4.95
1.58
5.96
12.7
51.6
9.3
3.44
0,34
7,01
208.9
248,6
240.2
514.5
677.5
520.7
0.99
1.53
0.97
10.4
8.2
9.6
2?
23
20
5.85
6,15
2.90
78.6
87.5
50.9
233,6
283.9
234.2
1.47
1 .62
3,61
24.0
20.1
27.4
2.26
2.76
3.47
7.0
l"».l
98.3
98.9
640.2
453.0
1 .54
8.19
6.67
75.7
13.0
14.<1
5.26
5,38
5.49
205. 0
309.3
179.7
649.1
882.9
448.1
2.51
2.47
0 . HU
9.0
6.4
11.9
25
?b
27
5.5?
9.37
3.75
58.5
100,4
70. 1
194.4
349.0
258. 1
1 . J'
1 .64
3.05
29.8
16.5
23.3
2.51
1.62
3.74
4.3
8.0
104.8
112.7
176.7
468,4
2.65
0.71
7.07
69.6
45.6
13.8
4,49
7.52
5.72
158.0
365.2
216.6
504.9
848.8
525.4
1.85
1 .58
1 .00
11.6
6.1
10,0
28
29
30
2.75
6.91
2.47
37,6
85.3
04,5
229,4
267.7
249.1
2.52
1 .67
3.64
29.9
21.0
27. 1
1 .61
2.40
4.02
8.3
16.6
183,0
132.0
587.1
462.8
1 .78
7.90
4,49
59. 1
14.3
1 1.6
0.12
4.53
5,18
1 88.5
295.5
196.9
601 .9
024 .5
453.9
2. 36
2.13
0. 75
9.7
6, B
11.4
31
32
3.92
10.71
58.8
109,4
215.4
258.3
1 .56
1.13
27.7
19.1
2.63
1.58
3.0
11.2
123.6
179.7
2.97
0.55
65.0
43.9
5.75
13.56
171.0
388. 1
495.6
794.6
1 .35
1 .26
11.3
6.1
SUM
BAG
J.21
1.17
55.3
7b.0
226.3
221.1
2.3"* 27.a
1.99 25.1
2.11 411,6 309.2 a,92 23,0
2.36 <15.3 323.7 <1.97 22.1
3.62 117.2
«.98 226.5
561 .9
565.7
2.32 11,0
1.52 9.5
33
2.04
25,7
71 .5
0.54
70.9
0,41
0.4
39.2
0.04
215
0.39
1.5
127.3
0.18
67.8
30
5.09
80, 1
380.5
0.21
17.0
5.35
4.9
470.4
0,46
17.9
3.84
29 , 4
1556.2
1 .93
5.5
35
6,00
83.3
298.4
1 .39
19.8
1.91
15.3
354.4
0.35
23.1
1 .66
12.5
782. 1
0.83
11.0
36
1.6?
40,0
222.6
0.32
30.5
1 .43
12.0
259,7
0.34
31.3
1.11
18.4
566.0
0,61
14.8
57
1 .35
18.3
172.4
1.64
43.2
0.51
1.2
228,0
0.68
38.4
1.18
18.9
440.6
0.86
18,6
38
1.31
31.2
223,4
2.18
52.1
1 .07
1.4
236, 1
3.70
36.7
1.47
41.0
490.3
2.43
15.9
39
1.19
31.0
186.7
3.48
37.1
1.09
1.9
305.9
8.82
28.4
1.74
58. 7
579.7
5.39
13.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
26b
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODIL WESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES
DFNVtR
VEH
YF AP
MAKE
MODL
CIO
VEH
013
1 97 3
BUIC
P I V I
155
011
MODE
Nil,
HC
LO
CII2
MIX
MPG
HC
1
8.02
210.1
135,7
1
O 1
• 1
3> 1
C 1
1 O.fl
8,19
2
6.76
106.5
676.1
1.11
9.0
H.66
3
12.51
268.9
1009.9
1.19
6.0
12.55
1
1.95
110.6
572.9
0.95
1 1.6
6.52
5
3.79
101,5
501.9
1.18
11.1
1.08
6
3.17
91.1
<179.5
0.95
13.9
1.90
7
5.75
153,9
U0B. 1
1.19
1 1 .9
7.50
8
1.18
181,1
U9B.0
2.09
tl.l
6.28
9
1.97
111.7
193. 7
1 .82
13.0
5.97
10
1.36
105,7
561,5
2.J7
U.9
1,80
1 1
6.79
222. 1
513.6
1 .«5
10.0
6.75
12
5.63
206.0
691 . 1
2.91
8.6
6.71
I 3
0.16
282.1
562.7
1 .11
0.6
7,2ft
11
1.50
153.8
502,5
1 .91
M.7
1.71
15
6.59
9 1.1
555.9
1.20
12.3
7.29
16
1 3. 38
213.1
1216.2
1 .62
5.5
11,30
17
5.21
160.3
512. 3
0.99
10.9
6.91
10
5.00
1 76.6
550. 7
0.08
10.5
6.10
19
1,69
129.1
525.8
0.91
11.9
13.25
20
6.21
195.3
661.8
1.05
9.0
9.17
21
6.76
272.7
528.9
1 .18
9.1
7.90
22
6.62
211.3
611.8
2.06
0.9
7.61
23
9.76
180,5
806.0
1.71
7.9
9.71
21
1. 30
1 35.0
511.2
1 . 19
12.0
5.99
25
3.62
115.B
500.2
1.07
12.6
9.73
26
0.11
112.0
781.2
1.79
9.0
9.81
27
5.61
261.7
112.3
1.61
10.5
6,82
20
5.06
136.2
595. 1
1 .76
10.8
5,85
29
8.13
115.2
779. 3
1.61
0.6
8.05
30
a .80
160,6
505.6
1.13
1 1 .5
5.88
31
«.ll
176.8
532, 3
1.95
10.8
5.09
12
0.31
113.5
782,1
1 .69
8.6
9.57
SUM
1.70
113.9
598.0
2.18 1
10.6
i,8i :
HAG
5,51
IB6.7
587. 1
1 .65
9.9
6.76 i
31
1.01
32.7
80.0
0.01
65.9
0,69
31
1 1 .OB
291 .8
1761.8
2.29
1.9
5.23
35
0.21
121,6
1101.6
5.16
6.3
2.92
36
5.79
B 3 , 0
901.9
3.11
8.1
2.83
37
3.06
15.5
676.2
2.21
11.7
2.22
10
l."7
118.8
612.2
1.21
10.7
1.71
VEH YF A R MAKF MHOL CID
015 1971 CAPH SEOA 1SS
cn
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CO?
N11X
MPb
17 3,0
H8.5
116,1
306,0
615.9
705.5
619.0
518.5
527 . J
5a« . 0
611.3
583.6
650.7
630.9
795.2
72 3.2
602. B
599. 5
1315.6
552.3
65(1.3
533.6
770.3
582.7
! 63.9
H81 . 1
518.3
632. 7
096.7
616.9
679,3
H23.0
558.0
659.1
917.1
60i.fi
663.5
39
2.59 95.9 586.1 1.23 11.9
1 ,7ft
95.«
00.5
50.0
SI.5
53.8
1.70 7.6
1.29 6,7
1.02 2.9
1.26 8.0
1.33 9.6
1.07 10,9
1.67 8.2
1.11 8,5
2.02 8.8
1.55 9.2
2.38 7.1
2.09 7.1
1, OS
2.10
1.25
2,ui
1 .01
1.17
1.11
1 ,62
1 .79
7.1
">.7
9.7
1.6
8.0
7.7
8.2
6.6
8.2
2.12 7.0
2.07 6.3
1.89 9.0
1.71
1 .7h
2.31
1 ,60
1 .88
2.1 3
1.81
1.82
8.8
6.1
7.5
8.6
7.0
9.0
8.1
6.3
2.10
1.59
9.7
8.0
ll.u 109.8
0.06 68.3
0.02 5.0
960. 3
0 11.1
537 . 1
611.5
100.1
0.69
1 .23
7.9
9.3
1.98 11.3
S.8U 11.1
3.90 18.1
1.U8 93.0
1.90 79.6
6.1b 121.5
2.B1 65.8
2.29 53.7
2.29 13.3
3.16 102.0
3.18 52.6
3.31 16,0
3.01 3 <. 0
3.99 00.1
~.69 IB,2
~.29 02.6
2.80 35.1
1.96 51.8
9.11 112.6
1.32 75.6
3.03 61.7
3,25 63.6
3,55 65.6
1.12 106.7
1 .97 6 i. 7
7,3* 97.9
3.21 66.0
2.18 35.2
6.B3 77.9
3.61 7H.1
3.27 16,1
5,Bfl BO.O
3.16 8b,9
2.66
6.57
52. 1
80.9
3,01
3.50
51.7
60.0
171.8
391.8
601.1
1H .0
310.9
267.5
325.1
309.1
322.1
333.2
316.7
103.9
399.4
309.5
299.5
5B8.2
317.1
329,5
305. 1
0
2
361,
165,
3/0.1
060 ,7
310.1
308 . 1
1S1.0
357 .1
330 . 1
112,1
311.1
325.1
H3.0
1.85 16. /
1.70 16.7
1.16 10.9
1.70 19.6
2.76 22.0
1.67 25.9
2.51 17.9
~.62 22.0
1.23 21.9
5.K1 22.5
5.77 17.B
5.01 10.1
~. 0u 1e . 3
4.81 23,8
1 .59 22.1
1.18 11.2
2.02 l».9
1.07 20,1
2.60 21.1
2.17 10.6
3.10 16,2
5.01 10.3
2.60 13.9
4.5* 20.9
3.12 23.9
1 .«H IS.i
5.<)1 10,1
2.00 21.5
3.26 15.9
2.81 19.1
3.11 21.1
2.19 15.0
326.7 3.50 21.3
330.6 3.25 19.9
0.10 7.0
1.81 131.9
2.11 39.3
2.23 62.7
1.90 12.9
1.81 28.2
2.02 17,1
16.8 0,01 116
507.8 0.29 12.2
3H.2 0.21 21.7
205.U 0.21 22.7
225.1 0.69 29,7
266.6 2.21 2B.0
321.7 6.71 25.0
FMISSIHN RESULTS in grams PER mile (PER MINUTE FIIR IDLE)
FUEL EC'INrm IN MILFS PEW GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FnR IDLE)
FUEL tCMNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 11 1,85 C A RBflN TO HYDROGEN RATIO
26o
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH YEAR
016 1971
MAKF MODL CID
CHEV VEGA 14 0
VEM YEAR make MODL CID
017 1973 CHtV NOVA 250
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
01B 197 3 CHEV NOVA 307
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
1.70
0.91
1 .37
75,1
«. I
132,7
511 .5
186.8
519.9
5.01
0.61
1 .36
13.3
45.2
12.1
1.01
1.71
3.«7
322. 1
37,2
78.2
735.1
278.3
714.9
1.57
0,48
1.79
7.1
25.9
10,5
9.72
1 3.1«
14.59
196. 1
221.6
272,8
376.6
545.6
865.1
0.47
0 ,66
0.9J
12.1
9.1
6,6
4
5
6
0.72
0.70
1.10
29.7
10.1
3.6
175.2
380.1
112.9
2.81
1.26
0.67
16,9
22.2
58.0
1.57
1.77
0.77
50.2
35.3
17.1
519,8
386.1
172.3
2.11
3.78
0.32
1«,7
19.9
14.0
5.10
3.69
5.55
129.2
135.B
120. 1
468,1
365.8
367.1
0,95
0.80
0.77
12.9
15,0
15.5
7
B
9
0.81
2.97
0.56
29.6
2.7
31.3
196.9
172.2
376.2
5.83
0.91
1.68
16.3
47,8
20,8
4.69
1.83
1,79
123.8
15.7
"3.5
389, 3
187.8
396.7
1 .44
0.58
«.13
14.8
10.7
18.9
4,44
7.31
4.99
188.0
177.1
179.5
357.9
398.5
373.0
0.90
1.41
1 ,20
13.1
12,7
13.2
1 0
1 1
12
1.1"
0.93
3.92
6.9
10.5
6.2
119.8
176,3
161,6
0.69
5.81
0.83
54,0
16.3
17.5
0,98
4.12
1.11
15.3
180.9
17.S
188.0
436.9
197.8
0.72
2.06
0,67
11.2
12.1
38.B
7.79
6,84
10.79
115.7
251 .8
222.2
414.2
381.1
518.3
I .50
1 .20
1 .69
12.7
11.1
9.8
1 3
1. 3
9,0
56.8
110.3
1 31
573.2
a, 81
0.70
7.96
19.3
58.2
13.3
5.69
0.73
8.96
52.2
21,5
195.5
500.4
234.9
642.4
3.19
0,59
1 .08
14.B
32.2
9.1
6.82
10.05
7.B8
1 79.9
219,9
212.1
405.B
525.7
439.7
0,11
0.51
5.35
12.5
9.8
11.1
22
23
21
1.98
1 .19
1.22
10,3
72.3
32.9
122.6
514.7
371.1
0,68
1,04
1.92
58,6
11.0
20,6
1 ,09
6,38
2,18
16,6
96.6
60.9
168,8
810.0
459.1
0,86
2.76
3.64
44.e
9.0
15.8
6.87
10.85
7,02
122.6
169.6
188.7
533.1
616.3
358.7
3.80
1 .95
1 .06
1 1 .1
9 . 4
13.1
25
26
27
3.09
1.56
1.16
5.9
12.2
26.7
121.1
179,6
110.5
0,66
0.57
6.32
61.9
"3.6
18.3
0,63
0.96
5.53
11.9
31.2
110.6
135.0
277.1
484.5
1 .20
0.50
2.57
57.0
26.6
12.3
6,41
1 3.22
12.33
191.9
1 76.6
231 .2
373.1
617.3
106.2
1.12
1 .05
1 .14
12.8
9.3
11.0
28
29
30
2.23
1.33
1 .19
13.7
51.7
37.6
116,3
173.5
120.1
0,49
3.31
5.72
61.2
15.7
18.1
0.76
5.19
3.28
17,«
93.7
1 36. 7
197.5
668,2
466.4
0.72
2.48
2.01
39.0
10.7
12.B
8.58
16.76
7.72
191.9
225. 1
202.1
127.3
540.0
365.7
1.02
0.71
1.42
11.7
9.4
12.5
31
32
3.79
2.17
6.0
1«.«
123.2
175.2
0.51
0.15
61.1
13.1
0.72
0,94
12.0
38.7
181.9
280,5
1.17
0.19
13.7
25.B
6.97
11.16
199.7
191.0
407 .7
671 .0
1.73
1 .49
11.9
8. 1
SU* 1.31 19.1 282.6 2.18 27.9
HAG 1.3B 23.9 314,7 2,68 21.9
2.26 54,3 376,9
2,65 56,8 361.0
1,09 18,9 6,«0 154,6 420,B 1.57 13,0
1.72 19,2 8.66 210.9 131.9 1,41 11.2
33
0.27
".0
30,0
0.07
197
0.65
11.3
104.6
0.37
68.7
0,81
22.7
77.8
0.03
76,5
31
2.90
B7.9
313,0
0.61
19.3
6.31
109.2
531.1
0.48
12.3
1.51
165.9
1001.5
0.12
7.0
35
1 .59
49, 1
176.2
0.31
34.4
0.98
21.0
598.2
0.52
13.9
2.06
97.9
601.5
0.25
11.6
36
0.88
9.6
201.1
0.51
10.5
0.51
16.6
683,6
0.58
12.5
1.32
57.9
503.6
0,28
14.8
37
0.95
6.7
213.7
0.50
39.1
0.18
9.2
471 .1
0.71
18.3
2. "7
56.8
320 .1
0.63
21 .3
38
0.50
5.6
219.9
1.00
38.6
1 .07
17.9
251.1
1 .02
31.1
2,"5
65.4
380 .5
1 .19
18.1
39
0.53
12.3
250.1
1 .78
32.7
1 .34
18.8
312,6
3.26
25.6
1.32
111.2
102.3
2.17
11.9
tMISSKIN RESULTS IN GRAMS PtP MILE (PfcR MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FuFL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARRON TO HYDROGEN RATIU
267
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING (IF MODAL RFSMLTS nN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DF N VtR
VF- H
YMR
make
M0OL
CID
VtH
YEAR
HAKE
MUDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
019
1973
CHEV
NQVA
307
020
1973
CHEV
MAL I
350
021
1973
CHFV
MAL I
Moot
NO,
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
1
2
3
11 .33
9.27
15. 01
205.3
226.1
312.1
1J1.2
532.3
781.3
0,61
0.56
0,78
11.2
9.7
fc.7
1 1.50
2.56
6.97
399, 1
59.1
210.7
839.3
150.9
952.1
0,95
0.31
0.81
5.9
35.2
6.6
11.72
2,10
7.10
333.8
39.7
1 39.8
730.1
372.5
1 033.0
2.72
0,16
2.0?
u
S
b
8.70
S, 26
5.00
171.3
131.1
1 31.6
129.8
358.0
329.0
0.52
0 .99
0.60
12.J
15.3
16.0
5.77
7.13
1.1?
189.7
206. <1
22. 1
608. 1
177.6
219, 1
0.61
0.65
0.21
9.6
10.8
30.9
5.03
5.16
0.82
58.2
101,8
11.7
711.8
591.7
208.5
1.20
3.50
0.27
7
8
9
6.61
6.2"
6.82
161.3
190.6
150.3
367 .3
353. 1
366.2
1.11
0.93
1.19
13.8
13.2
H.2
2.51
2.23
12.81
117.5
29.2
393.1
708.9
256,2
533.5
0.93
0.27
0.51
6.2
28.7
7.«
12.10
5.16
9.10
393,9
8.6
270 .0
681.0
200.3
515.5
1.82
0.62
1.85
I n
II
1?
7.01
8.83
".33
166.6
251.6
250.0
105.0
107.8
186.8
0.96
0.82
0.95
12.9
11.0
9.8
1.17
17.11
2.33
28.3
512.1
15.2
307.2
713.1
316.3
0,21
0.77
0.?9
25.0
5.5
21.1
0 .99
13.13
1 .?5
in.6
508. 1
11.5
252.8
616.1
262.2
0.59
1 .28
0.5?
1 3
1 i
lb
1 1 .52
7.19
7.29
283.5
190.6
111.3
139.0
353.6
111.6
0.80
0.61
0.56
9.6
13.1
13.7
16,90
1.73
1 . 75
112.5
58.6
17.1
667.5
283,7
391.6
0.66
0.23
0.21
6.3
23.3
18.7
H.93
l.H
1.31
113. 1
11.1
28.6
665.6
273.6
303.0
1 .29
0.61
0.33
16
17
I ft
20.00
10.69
8.0?
277.3
202.5
233,7
1001 .2
396.1
390.3
0.68
0.61
0.38
5.9
11.9
11.3
7.23
16.31
1.22
127.2
508.5
26.8
1031.2
685,0
336,8
0.52
0.57
0.31
7.1
5.8
21.2
1.00
13.35
1.21
61.5
286.6
18.8
718.9
653.5
298. 3
0.57
1.96
0.3?
19
?o
?l
7.11
".53
10.11
1 31.7
215.6
300 .1
112.8
198.7
120. 1
0.55
0.50
0.72
13.7
9.7
9.6
17.73
2.10
26. 12
262.7
52.0
553.8
661,1
387 ,1
856,9
1 .07
0.11
1.13
7.8
18,7
1.9
13.09
1 .62
17.55
218.3
25.6
517.6
608. 1
317.5
719,9
1 , 81
0. JB
1.31
22
23
?«
9.5i
12.70
9.27
250.1
287.0
201.2
159, 1
598.1
356.9
0.69
0.58
0.66
10.1
8.1
12.7
2,20
10.16
11.16
10.7
305.2
313.7
302.6
805, 3
563.9
0.21
0.96
0,56
23,8
6.7
7.7
l.?5
7.20
1 1 .89
11.1
1 39. 7
320.6
?18, 0
8 13.7
516,1
0.63
1.17
1.12
?5
26
27
8.03
11.23
1 1 .32
216.7
180.5
263.0
335.6
623.1
398.7
0.61
0.72
0.55
12.7
9.1
10.5
1 .67
3.3H
15.99
35.9
19. 7
155.9
2S8.a
189.2
609. 1
0.18
0.29
0.56
27.7
15.1
6.1
0,90
1 .95
11,71
9.7
29.6
<59.1
260,6
366.5
511 .2
0.56
0 . Ufl
1.1?
?8
2"
30
10.81
15.06
8.01
210.6
275.8
220.3
398.5
503.5
350. 1
0.55
0.11
0,12
10.9
9.0
12.3
1 .60
13.76
15.20
33.8
376.7
136.0
311.1
970.5
627.6
0.20
0.59
0.51
21.0
5.5
6.5
2.57
6,80
11,75
37.3
103.7
538.1
378.6
827 .3
596,6
1 . SI
'1.10
0.90
31
32
10.16
13,57
288 ,9
239.9
335.7
616,5
0.50
0.77
io. e
8.6
2.37
3.30
11.7
57.6
215,7
176.9
0.16
0.28
10.7
15.1
0.91
1.90
6.5
10.8
190.2
286. $
0.29
0.2?
6.8
?0. 1
7.0
1.0
6. J
>b.K
5.3
8.1
H.I
21 .2
7.8
19,9
«.«
h.O
SUM 7,78 196.1
HAG 9,?2 235.?
381 .6
102.5
0.63 12.1
0.67 11.1
6.1U 17 3,2
6.2i 217. 8
una.8
521.0
0,60 1 I.1
n.Uh 10,0
5.07 132.7
5.36 161.6
127.2
177,8
1.11 13.6
1.12 11.0
33
2.36
10,3
53.7
0.02
71.2
1 .65
53.9
159.0
0.13
35.7
0.60
1.6
52.7
0.06
113
S«
22.07
UJ.9
788.2
0.21
5.8
7.H
206.5
1177.7
0.79
S.8
U . 29
36.a
D51 .0
0.11
17.0
35
1 .61
77.6
807.7
0.37
9.5
1 .52
61.7
831,8
0.17
9.5
2.0 3
58.0
608,0
0.17
12.6
36
1.11
60.6
552.1
0.25
l«.l
1 .28
51.0
529,8
0.31
11.3
1.75
18.9
106,9
0.31
18.1
37
1 .99
69.6
337 .3
0.38
19.6
1 .65
16.0
319.6
0.21
20.8
1 .99
39. 1
295.9
0.28
21.1
38
?.79
101.9
353,9
0.11
16.8
1.22
21.6
381.6
0.70
21.2
1 .62
?7.1
330.7
0.5B
21.1
39
7 .98
211.0
295.7
0.66
13.6
1 .91
61.1
122.5
0.99
16.8
1 .25
?6.U
371.0
1.67
21.3
EMISSION results In grams PER mile (PER minute FOR IDLE)
fuel konqmy in miles per gallon (minutes ptR gallon for iolfj
F Ml- L ECONOMY CALCULATIONS assume a ljl.85 carbon tu hydrogen ratio
2ocJ
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING flF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VF H
Yt AH
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
022
1973
CHEV
MONT
350
023
1973
CHtV
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
nox
MPG
HC
CD
CU2
1
3,08
101,0
593,9
1.52
11,6
6.66
109,6
122.0
2
3.08
96,6
686.1
1 .20
10,5
2.25
30.1
210,9
3
1.98
157.2
1071.0
1.10
6.7
8.08
115.6
961 .a
1
2.32
78.J
511 .6
0.76
13.2
1.29
58.5
776,2
5
1.78
65.7
165,5
1.39
15.5
1.11
65.5
631.6
6
1.16
38.1
120.6
1.12
18,3
1,00
12.1
312.5
7
1 .89
81.7
192.8
2.87
11.0
9.50
271.1
688,6
8
1.51
60.6
179.1
2.18
15,3
1 ,19
13.5
326,0
9
1.57
62,1
169.7
2.36
15.5
6.11
288.9
639,8
10
1 .38
16.0
513.8
1.91
15.0
1.71
9.6
281.2
U
2.05
97.1
552.1
1.30
12.5
9.06
391.1
761.5
12
1 .77
65.7
617.7
2.16
11.7
2.H
2.7
172,0
13
2.27
9b.0
628.3
3.71
U.l
9.02
158.1
870,2
11
1.31
15,1
171.6
1.95
16.1
1 .78
9.8
261 ,2
15
1.52
13,6
513.7
0.83
11,1
1.11
22.3
333.0
16
3.79
100.9
1 181.2
1.07
6.6
3.1 0
68. 3
861,8
1 7
2. 18
79.9
559.1
2.75
12.8
9.32
381.6
889.6
1«
1 .69
56.3
556.1
1.38
13.6
1 .33
16.0
323,8
19
1 .81
63.9
190.7
1.72
11.9
7.10
292.0
710,1
20
2.H
77.5
655.7
1.52
11.3
1 ,16
13.1
318, 1
21
2.86
150.6
612.B
3.38
10.3
1 1 .76
196.9
957.6
22
1 .91
81,1
589.1
1.81
12.3
2.32
10.6
277,9
23
3.15
121,3
791.6
1.69
8.9
5,60
109. 1
1193,1
21
1.75
73.5
501.5
2,56
11.3
6.78
261,5
698,9
25
1.25
15.1
192.1
1.91
15.6
1 .96
10.6
295,5
26
2.15
61.3
639,5
1.25
9.1
1.77
25. 1
119,7
27
2.00
89.5
597.3
3.21
11.9
6.12
291.2
781, I
28
1.19
16.5
559.2
1.97
13.9
1.37
11.9
321,2
29
2.71
106.0
732.5
1.32
9.8
1,99
105. 1
959.8
10
1 .87
83.0
513.0
2.80
13.7
8.31
111.3
711,0
31
1.50
66.5
531 .8
2.07
13.8
2.02
10.5
297.2
32
2.19
78,7
821 .5
l.«2
9.3
1.77
22.7
381.6
SU«
1 .52
57.5
518,0
2,16
1«.5
3.11
116.3
533.7
RAG
1 .62
73.6
576. 1
2.30
12.7
3.73
139,0
569.6
33
0.18
1«.2
103.6
0.06
69.6
0.65
13.1
75.9
31
5.11
161.3
1272.1
0.65
5.8
6.83
111.7
955.3
35
2.12
82.2
679.8
0.33
10.9
1 .61
70.1
727.1
36
1.30
50.2
153.2
0.19
16.6
1 .20
51.1
522.1
37
0.95
17,1
311.8
0.31
21.0
1 .35
38.1
385.6
38
0.89
1 1 ,8
386.7
l.«3
21.7
1.35
11.0
122.2
39
0,61
19.1
165.5
3,10
17,8
0.57
16.5
527.7
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
021 1971 CHRY NE*P UOO
NO*
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NO*
MPG
1.07 H.1
0.19 30.0
2.79 7.3
<1.61 10.1
0.56 11.9
0.56 26,5
2.36 7.7
0.81 25.2
2.01 e.o
0.81.29.1
1.HI 6.1
0,70 18,3
2.19 5.5
0.70 J1 .1
0.28 2 3.8
0.52 9.1
2.50 5¦8
0,57 25.1
1.92 7.3
0.63 23.7
2.H 5.0
0,55 29.1
6.10 6,1
2.35 7.6
0.18 27,9
0.30 19.1
2.58 7.0
0,60 25,6
1.70 7.8
1 .32 6.a
0.65 27,7
0.31 20.ft
2.01 12.2
1.78 11.1
0.07 89.8
0.79 7.1
0,11 10.5
0.33 1".5
0.39 19,7
2.65 19,8
3,79 15.9
9,07 166, 1 <138.6
9.65 218.3 655.7
15.23 318.6 938.6
6.63 156.1 118,7
5.19 116,6 181,7
5,01 106.1 199,3
7.06 150.0 16 7.1
6,11 190.8 511.1
5.81 101.2 533.2
6.11 118.5 601.1
8.51 271 . 1 501.3
8,01 >85,1 756,*>
9,01 227,6 595.0
5.73 129.1 560.0
7.60 135.9 537.3
16.02 331.9 1029.7
7.62 250.7 501.9
6.66 170.6 550,8
6.30 152,9 502.1
8.18 183,1 613,7
9.07 327.1 522.1
8.35 205,2 601,8
11.50 273.5 796.1
6,01 168.9 511.5
5.87 131.1 518.0
12.11 21S.H 7 38,7
8.99 101.5 558.9
7,71 157.0 515.0
10.9b 258.3 696.7
7.97 257.7 178.9
6.91 205.6 521.1
12.81 251.1 699.1
1.22 12.1
1.17 8.2
1,32 5.8
1.03 12,1
1.99 13.0
1.70 11.0
1.71 12.2
2.13 in.3
3.71 12.5
2.97 11.0
2.01 9.3
3,80 8.3
3,06 9.0
2,70 11,1
1.25 11.5
1.53 5.5
1.12 9.6
1.57 10,6
2.09 11.6
2.03 9.3
1.15 8.J
2.11 ft, «
2.10 7,0
3.09 11.1
2.38 12.0
1,76 8,0
?.13 8.1
2,0 3 10,9
1.63 7.8
1.85 9,8
1.79 10.2
1.21 7.8
6.50 168,6
6.75 212.1
513.2 2.30 10.7
572.8 2.31 9.6
1.72 50.7 75.3
19.16 592.1 9U3.0
9.01 287,9 188.7
1,65 177,3 105.2
1.10 101.1 378.8
3.67 71.6 178.1
1.53 116,0 559,9
0.03 55.3
0.ui 1.6
0.23 9.2
0.25 12.7
1.28 16.1
2.88 11.6
2.98 11,7
MISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL FCONQMY IN MILES PFR GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON KIR IDLE)
FUEL FCriNllMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARHON Til HYDROGEN RATIO
26S)
-------
APHE MOT X D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MOOAL WFSUI T3 ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
OFNVER
VEH YEAR
025 1 7 3
MAKE MODL cm
OATS 1200 71
VEH YEAR MAKE HODl CID
026 1973 DODG DART 225
VEH VEAP make MODL CID
n?7 197 3 miDG CHAH jir
MIIDE
Nn.
CO
CO?
Nil*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
Ml)*
MPG
HC
CO
CII2
Nil*
MPG
1
2
J
1
5
6
7
6
9
) 0
1 I
12
1 5
H
lb
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
21
21
25
26
P 7
28
29
30
31
32
5.02
u , 3u
6.<13
2.58
1.77
1 .61
2.01
1 .98
2.1«
2.1«
2."7
2.87
S7 ,9
51.8
<>6.8
55.1
2". 3
16.6
«2.1
7".7
68.2
17.B
63.6
80.2
J.38 89.0
2.15 19.u
3.13 58,8
8.19 130,8
3.27 69.0
2.76 52.9
2.61
2.98
1.06
3.21
1.73
2.37
2.06
5.19
3.01
2.61
1.52
2.61
2.33
5.75
55.1
h/.l
86.8
90.2
96,6
63,2
16, 1
86.9
91 , 3
57.0
90.5
79.0
59.1
<»1.2
251.8
393.9
502.8
271.6
213.1
215.9
202.2
189.9
181.3
216.5
205.7
257.2
239.7
202.6
232.0
172.7
201.2
270.3
220.9
329, 1
209.3
233.5
306.3
211.8
215.0
339.0
236.9
238.9
295.1
238.5
222.9
336. 1
0.92 21,7
1.35 18.0
1.20 11.1
1.37 26.3
2.10 30.9
1.73 32.0
1.00 32.3
0.75 28.3
0.87 29.8
1.75 29.8
0.75 25.6
I.58 22.6
1.23 22.7
1.53 30.9
0.79 26.5
1.07 12.6
1.01 27,5
1.23 21.5
1.20 28.0
1.32 20.0
0,72 25.0
0.91 23,0
1.27 18.7
1.53 25.5
1.80 30,2
1.25 18.0
1.16 22.1
1.60 26.3
1.22 19.6
1.27 23.9
1.66 27.U
1.32 17.6
8,05 106.3
2.58 11.6
6.68 91.0
6.7? 198.8
5.78 138.8
1.11 12,0
6.16 173.3
1.11 21,6
5.15 151.2
2.56 21.5
7.16 272.3
2.69 2a.3
6.91 270.3
1.91 19.2
2.01 13.6
5.17 79.1
9.79 350.9
2.01 16.1
7.99 223.0
2.12 21.3
8.10 322.7
2,63 16,9
9,99 330.6
6,21 251.0
1.70 19.0
2.67 11.1
7.1b 321 .2
2.73 17.6
8.55 281,3
6.70 266.6
1.18
2.<>?
22.2
21.8
150.6
251.7
596.7
135.2
378.6
129.1
530.2
159,9
391.2
118.7
532.3
175.0
511.7
130.1
199.8
106.0
169.8
168.2
127,2
177.0
619.2
112.9
189.2
388.6
116.1
212.1
111.1
H7.9
507.0
190.2
121.2
221.1
2.02 13.8
1.12 31.0
2.06 11.7
0,70 11,5
1.12 11.1
1.00 58.1
1.30 10,8
0.65 11.8
1,11 13,6
0.91 16.6
2.75 9,0
0.86 10.0
2.10 9.3
0.73 53.1
0.88 39.0
0.72 16.2
1.16 6.1
1.09 11.3
1.33 11.1
0.89 39,8
3.72 7,7
0,57 19,9
0,92 8.5
1.16 11,1
0.55 58.6
0.9h 12.u
1.39 9.1
0.81 18.1
1.05 9.1
2.10 9,5
0.66 51.2
0.61 33.5
6.12 196.u
6.11 196.0
9.18 253.2
3.19 117.7
3.91 81.8
3.13 88,1
1.89 118,0
3,79 111,e
1.62 131.1
1,27 113,6
5.90 219.7
6.19 169.5
6. 78 227 . 1
1,18 132.3
5.05 I0«.2
12,06 272.5
5.62 196.3
5.09 177.8
5.20 170.9
6.69 208.7
6.50 222.1
5,86 161,3
8.10 219.1
5,07 172,1
1.71 I16.7
9.17 181,2
6,60 226.5
6.12 151.2
8.39 215.3
5.71 209.5
5.30 166.2
9.73 197.1
517. 7
556.8
930. 1
525.2
155.8
397.2
191.5
165, 6
165. 1
151. 8
195,8
571.7
521.2
127.6
115.1
896.8
397. 3
1/9.1
383.8
566.6
510.2
116.3
660 . 3
127.3
120.8
618.8
178.2
179,
601 ,
113,
152,
629,
i.oi i n. i
0,87 10.0
1.11 6.5
1.11 11.6
1.87 1 '1.8
I .09 16.3
2.92 12.0
2,08 13,5
2.07 12.9
1 . lb 11.7
1.82 10.t
2.20 1(1.1
1.86 y.ti
1.61 13.7
0.85 11.2
1.06 f> , 5
0.96 12.3
O.OB 11,5
0.75 11.1
1.10
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MflDAL RESULTS On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DFNVER
VFH YtAR
088 19 73
MAKE M0PL CIO
fORD PINT 97
VEH YEAR MAKE MUOL CID
029 1973 FOWP MA VE 250
VEH Yt A P MAKE MUDL CID
030 197 3 FORD M A VE 302
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
CM2
NOX
MPG
HC
en
CC12
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CM2
NO*
MPG
1
2
3
i
5
6
7
B
9
10
1 I
12
13
11
15
1 6
17
IS
19
20
21
22
23
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
8.75 63.2
2.00 2U.6
3.15 161.8
3.20
2.03
1.81
2.flu
2,69
I . 66
1 .58
3. 38
1.79
1. 05
2.21
2.31
3.93
6.87
1 .93
5.01
2. 57
5. 36
2.67
6,73
2.62
2. 1 1
2.18
3.56
53.1
2".0
7.8
17.0
9.7
26.5
8.8
76.0
9.5
83.1
7.6
23. 1
95.?
81,9
11.7
68.7
19.3
82.1
20.2
92.6
55.1
5.6
29.2
81.5
2.18 12.6
5.30 77.2
2.77 50.1
?. 31
2.21
9.5
29.2
278.3
93.6
331.3
233,3
237.9
76.«
2H.1
95.2
208.8
86.0
211.U
102.7
215.9
83. 1
81.1
173.7
227.1
93.6
162.0
93.3
190,7
80.0
285.6
212.1
81 . 0
106.2
235.9
81.6
251 .2
216.2
100.3
105.9
5,01 21.9
0,59 61.0
3.87 11.8
1,66 27.2
5.69 31.5
0.79 93.9
3.56 29.9
1,11 71,6
1.20 31.7
1.23 81,7
3.00 25.8
1.20 72.0
3.50 22.8
0.99 87.0
0,39 69.3
0.31 26.1
3.26 23.5
0.73 75.2
3.11 31,0
0,53 67.6
2.03 26.<1
0.79 73.8
a.56 19.6
3.31 28,9
1.12 89.2
0.05 55.8
3.88 23.6
0.82 79.6
1.51 22.8
3.11 28.6
1 .38 72.i
0,50 55.9
6.17 137.3
6.89 180.6
10.11 216.3
5,23 110,0
1.35 129.2
1,10 111.3
1.76 117.3
1,39 133.7
1.51 122.1
1.90 118.9
5.35 168.9
5.91 157.0
6.31 195.6
1.17 120.6
5.58 123.2
11.29 206.9
5,81 166.9
5.05 162.1
5.62 111.5
6.09 176.7
6.91 211.9
6.23 191.1
8.17 231.8
1.92 176.8
1.37 121.7
8.21 197.1
5.61 195.5
5.31 123.5
7.93 215.2
5.29 196.0
<1.83 117.6
8.70 201,3
390.3
133.9
656, 7
315.8
300.B
290.3
311.1
318.9
313,1
356.1
351.7
116,1
111.8
328.6
350.5
715.7
321,1
351 .0
302.1
123.8
396.1
139.9
509.2
313.6
305.9
170.0
377.B
311.1
152.8
321.0
311.1
195.2
0.61 11.2
0.55 12.0
0.66 8.6
0.19 15.2
0.72 17.1
0.51 18,1
0.97 15.9
1,26 15,5
1.20 17.1
1.28 15.9
1.16 13.9
1.61 12,5
1.31 12.0
1.18 16.7
0.60 15.8
0.86 8.2
0.73 11,7
0.53 11.3
0.67 16.1
0.76 12,3
1.17 11.7
1.1« 11.7
0.7B 9.9
0.66 11.6
0.90 17.2
0.73 11.0
1.01 12.6
1.01 16,0
0.61 10.9
0.70 13.7
1.05 15.1
0.81 10.5
5.62 97.2 929.3
2.31 35.0 232.8
5.95 51.6 831.5
3.52 13.1
3.75 21.6
1.82 16.1
6.17 198.1
1.50 21.8
1.06 23.7
1.11 16.6
5.72 91.2
3,15 19,R
7.23 109.8
1.87 21,3
1.96 19.5
5.12 23.5
6,22 53.7
1.15 23.fl
6.73 103.5
1.92 29,6
B. 57 1 flfl, 6
2.62 22.0
6,25 52,3
5.10 58.3
2.86 18.n
2.81 32,8
6.01 58.1
1.19 18.5
6.16 5 5.0
6.72 137,3
2.76
2.77
18.2
29.1
618,7
122. 1
129.fl
681 .1
156,9
578.6
196.1
667.7
1 38,u
695.8
159.5
171.2
198.5
702.6
192.5
519.2
222.7
703. 7
196.5
816.5
577.1
1 70.0
250.6
619.9
197.8
716. I
606.6
152.5
216.9
1.53 8.1
0.51 30.1
1.63 9.5
2.?! 12,7
3.5u 18.6
0.50 55.2
3.56 8.8
0.18 12.2
5.10 H. 1
0,t>5 39.1
1.11 10.6
0,65 19,g
1.39 10.0
0.58 11.6
0.12 UP.7
0.63 16.1
5.12 11,0
0.58 37.H
1.8? 12.1
0.63 32.2
1.07 fl. b
0.56 37.1
3.89 9,1
1.17 12.9
0.61 12.8
0.56 2fl.5
1.71 12,1
0.53 38.3
3.17 10,5
3.A6 10.5
0.56 16.7
0.10 29.1
SUM
RAG
2. J1
3.39
31.0
61 .8
180.8 2.76 36.7
220.9 2.27 27.0
1.73 1H.8
5.30 165,3
311.5 0.92 15.2
362.6 0.96 13,9
3.82
1,26
17.8
56.5
122.5
165.3
2.12 17.1
2.02 15,6
33
0 .10
8.6
21.5
0.02
211
0.13
15.8
57.0
0.03
106
0,63
1.1
61.7
0.05
125
31
1.11
108.1
258.1
0.21
20.1
6.31
216.0
629.3
0.25
8.6
6,03
17.3
739. 9
0.59
11.3
35
1.50
118.5
218.9
0. J«
19.7
a.38
201.2
566.8
0.39
9.9
2.96
5.1
157,0
0.11
18,7
36
2.11
70.2
151.9
0.19
52.9
2.29
95.1
368.3
0.26
16.9
3.19
59.5
372. 7
0.30
18.6
37
1.11
55.2
163.8
1 .00
59.7
2.17
101.1
275.6
0.29
20.1
2.22
20,8
317.3
0.63
22.9
38
1 . 00
11.7
171.0
2.81
15.1
3.22
1 02. 3
268.7
0.39
20.2
2,13
26.1
367. 3
1.18
20,1
39
0.98
9.0
235.8
5,02
35.1
1.19
115.7
309.2
1.28
17.6
3.18
30.3
109, 1
2.17
19.0
MISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PtR MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL FCflNMMY IN MILES PER GALLON CMINUTFS PFR GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUMF A ltl.85 CARHON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2/1
-------
APPEMOIX 0,CONT'D
listing OF MODAL RESULTS On INDIVIDUAL V£H I CL^ S
OF N VE R
VEH
YL AH
MAKf
MODL
CIO
VEH
031
1973
Fown
TI1RI
351
032
MODE
'JO.
HC
co
CI >2
NflX
MPG
HC
1
9.ai
26b.5
1260.8
2.96
5.2
9.37
2
3.
-------
APPENDIX D.CUNT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DFNVFR
VEH
YfcAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
Oil
1973
ford
LTD
100
035
MODE
NO.
HC
CI)
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
1
6.95
118,6
950.11
3.01
7.5
18.31
2
2.11
39. 1
317.1
0.63
21.1
2.52
3
1,96
101,6
1212,8
2,69
6.1
7.12
u
2.67
105.9
871 .6
2.32
8.5
6,18
S
3.11
83,1
651.5
2.96
11.2
5.28
6
1 .07
13.3
183.7
0.61
12. 7
1.10
7
5.69
303.8
785.2
3.96
6.9
12.66
8
a. 31
17.3
251 .5
0,11
30.1
0.99
9
1.0b
2H.1
618.3
2.01
8.9
9.33
10
2.21
19.1
280.1
0.10
27.9
1,01
11
5.B7
352.8
816.8
2.36
6.1
13.51
12
3.05
25.1
303.9
0.55
25. 1
1.37
1 3
6.65
266.1
736.2
2.22
7.3
13.76
11
1 .98
21.5
279.5
0.18
27.1
0.99
15
1 .9U
13.6
229.2
0.19
29.2
1.12
1 6
6.30
131.6
626.8
0.62
10.1
3,09
17
6.68
362.0
821.0
1.81
6.3
12,60
18
1 .37
21.1
256.7
0.57
29.7
1.31
19
6.29
106.5
656.0
1.13
7.6
15.60
20
1.73
38.2
293.8
0.52
25.8
1.31
21
8.27
358,2
926.2
1.17
5.9
18.70
22
?.0i
28,5
326,8
0.18
23.5
1.57
23
5.09
167.6
1016.5
2.57
6.8
7.06
21
5.52
218,2
609.7
1 .58
9.1
1 3.65
25
2.26
23.9
223.8
0.11
33.0
0.98
26
2.90
61.2
307.9
0 .50
21.5
1.92
27
5.80
265, 1
716,8
1.71
7.5
9,37
28
1.78
21.9
258. 1
0,18
29.3
0,97
29
1.81
115,6
951 ,i
1.97
7.1
5.15
30
5, ?2
291.8
725.5
1 ,8b
7.1
12.36
31
2,31
27.9
213.2
0.12
33,6
0,90
3?
2.91
6 0,6
287.2
0.S1
22.7
1 .71
SUM
5.39
111.7
188, 0
1.57
13.2
1,12
Bar,
3.1?
121 .1
558.0
1.35
1 1.6
1.95
70
VFH YEAR MAKt MI1DL CIO
036 197 5 MERC HROU 129
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1 .62
0,37
1.32
10.7
20.7
7.3
6,09
1 1 .33
13.91
212.2
98.5
308.6
893,2
291 ,0
888.2
3,60
0.17
1 . 76
7.1
18.1
6.3
1 .72
2.15
0.30
13.7
17.9
38.1
1.57
3.76
8,23
121.0
99.7
11.1
691. 0
156.1
H3.5
1.68
2.17
0.27
9.9
H.2
37.9
1.10
0,12
1.38
11.3
36,7
15.9
8.31
9,59
1.50
390.0
37.3
98.3
687.9
172.6
605. 0
1 .10
0.17
o.Oi
6.7
33.9
1 1.5
0.52
0.72
0,50
32.1
11.8
28,0
9.12
8.25
1 1 ,26
17.5
397 .8
16.2
198.8
657.6
166.6
0.50
1 .69
0.59
29.3
6.8
32.3
1.13
0.61
0.25
11.1
31.8
25.9
1 1 .97
10.10
10.10
331.8
12.0
70.2
689.5
179.u
198.il
1.97
0.52
0.30
7.1
32.0
26.0
0,18
1.17
0.27
10.7
10.8
30.5
25.72
6.96
9.27
225.5
218.8
SI.9
535."
1012.7
181. 1
0.26
3.06
0.35
9.1
6.1
30. |
0.72
0.30
0.61
11 .5
26. 1
12.3
6.55
9,93
11,79
159.8
61.5
101,8
6b0.1
203.3
672.1
1.97
0.15
1.9?
9.5
?6,tt
6.6
0,13
1.15
0.66
23.6
10.8
13.5
12,11
8,00
5.51
53.5
171.9
1 06.0
196.6
813.7
600.8
0,51
2,66
3.62
27.8
8,0
11.3
0.60
0.31
1.39
31.3
20.2
13.6
9.11
1 1 .10
10.62
39.6
96.7
306.0
1 70,1
290.2
605.8
0,51
0. 38
2.H
31,0
18.6
7.9
0.16
1.60
0.71
31.2
10.5
12.1
8.81
7.70
6.57
56. 7
156.5
202.9
196.5
788.2
610,9
0.57
2.06
1.11
28, 5
8 .1
-------
4PPFn()1* D.CtlNl ' I)
listing iif mijo4l Jesuits iuj iNnivinuAi. vhmici f-s
[) E n v t R
VF H
Yt AW
MAKE 1
037
,107 3
OLOS i
IDE
Nil.
H(
cn
C02
1
8 . 1H
2 30 .8
1268.5
2
2. «3
13.0
310,1
3
5.76
58.5
1353,6
it
2.80
26.1
803.0
5
2.36
38.8
726.5
6
1.7 0
7.2
H0.5
7
".81
156.7
77 7 .0
8
7.2"
o . 1
1 30.8
0
2.85
(01.3
50 1 .2
1 0
5.15
0.2
163,7
11
5.57
276 . 3
753.0
12
6. 72
8.5
151. 1
1 3
0.11
208,0
7 71,3
1 1
1 . 8h
t .3
110.2
15
2.55
11.2
225. 1
1 6
5.63
33.1
508, a
1 7
6.60
127.5
0 0 6 , 1
1 8
1.16
10.5
107.0
1 O
5.00
88.1
751 .6
20
5.56
11.7
211.1
21
1 3.55
501 ,2
780,0
22
5.16
8.0
160.2
23
6.08
"7.3
081 . O
2i
7.61
20 1.1
502.0
25
5.50
6,1
158.1
26
1.00
1".5
307 ."
27
6.22
150.0
751. 7
28
6.0ft
0.8
180.0
20
6.11
33. 1
005.1
50
8.02
3 3 7 .6
502.5
31
6.06
7.1
201 .3
32
3.52
15.0
323.2
VtH YEAP make HOPl CIO
03ft 1973 ULOS CtML 155
VEH YEAR make "llHL r ID
059 1973 v*t.Yi" vtLI 31*
Nil*
MPG
HC
Cn
C02
NUX
MFC.
HC
cn
cti2
Nf)«
«P(,
i.if) S.J
1 .16 26,0
u.ifl 6.1
6 , 0 £1 10."
7.S3 11.2
n.bfl 50.5
2.8 3 5.9
0.h3 51.5
2.93 ". 3
0.68 15,i
u.55 7.1
0.77 i7.o
3,26 7.0
1.07 52.7
n.Sb 35.u
0.83.13.3
6,17 7.0
1.81 30.1
1. o J a, 8
2."3 35.1
l.oo 5.0
1.10 iu.2
6.11 8.2
3.hi 0.5
1 .UO "7.7
0.76 25.0
5.57 8.8
1 .20 H .2
6,10 o.|
2.07 7.7
1.25 38.2
o.oa 21.7
1.52 23.3 1103.0
2.0b 0.2 383.J
2.Oil 20.3 1 35b.7
1.2a 11.5 956.7
0.05 11.5 822.1
3.00 2.6 33".7
".61 101.6 8bU,2
2.58 1.6 380.5
1.62 36.0 775.5
2.76 6,0 368.5
3.15 125.5 911.2
<1.19 7.0 381,0
1.30 78.1 012.3
3.u? u.B 35H , 5
1.87 ",2 32".8
3.78 3".0 700.1
3.82 52.8 9U0.5
2.U0 «,9 378.8
3."7 23.7 825.2
3.30 B.5 123.7
8.3" 257.0 701 .6
".03 7,8 305.0
3.30 26.2 106H.1
2.66 28.8 7 8 0,0
3,80 5. 3 3"0 .5
2.32 7.0 1U2.0
3."8 78.0 86".1
2.63 12.0 35U.3
3.10 33.5 1066.2
3.61 57.1 933.0
3.70
2."7
6.3
20.5
256. 7
325,6
6.17 7.7
1.27 22.0
3.60 6.3
i,ou o.i
6.31 10.5
0,71 25.3
5."5 7.5
1.11 21.0
6.50 10.6
1.13 22.0
6.HO 7.0
I .27 21.8
7.51 8.5
1.27 23.6
0.81 26.3
1.25 10.3
7.07 8.5
1.27 22,5
5.06 10.2
1.32 10.B
".00 7.8
1."" 21.1
5.06 7.0
6.10 10.6
1.55 2".6
1.12 |0.2
6.11 8,0
I.35 23,5
6,"3 7.0
8.00 8.6
1.10 31.0
0.0" 2",3
".16 108,5
2.71 8.5
5.00 87.0
3.1" 27.1
3.U" 50 . u
3.53 ".3
5,61 156.7
5.12 0.1
3.82 71.1
2.03 1",3
5.55 150.
-------
APPFNDTX D,CMNT'0
LISTING (IF MODAL RESULTS On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEh
YEAR
MAKE
M'lDL
CIO
VEH
OOO
1973
PLYM
FURY
160
on
MflDF
Nil.
HC
CO
CP2
MIX
HPG
HC
1
9.82
169.2
858.6
5 .99
7.7
9,00
2
3.51
88.0
350,3
0 .80
17.8
9.00
1
5.90
205.0
920.3
1.17
7.0
16.12
0
S. 37
75.0
682,1
5.68
10.9
6.01
5
3.16
71.7
513,7
6.11
11.1
1.17
6
2.01
0/.9
175.9
0.82
31.5
1.11
7
6. 79
370 .0
602.5
3.11
7, 3
5.02
8
2.26
30.7
229.2
1 .03
31.2
1.86
9
3.63
116.9
560.9
6,21
11.7
5.61
10
2.06
17.5
218.2
1 .61
26,9
5.87
1 1
6.95
292,6
635.6
1,31
7.9
7.26
12
2.20
52.9
250.2
1 .38
26.1
7,60
11
8 .08
256.6
661 , 0
5.05
8.1
7.81
11
1 .95
36.6
217.1
1.71
31 .6
5.53
15
2.61
66.8
212,8
0 .12
25.6
0.17
16
7 .12
250,9
611.8
0.53
8.6
28.01
1 7
6.52
160,0
755.1
6,16
8,6
7.55
18
2.37
52,5
215.7
1 .31
29.2
6.12
19
5.87
110.7
656,1
6.16
10,5
6.32
20
2.73
68.5
219.0
1 ,1<>
25.0
7.79
21
10.11
362.1
712,9
1.86
6.7
8.19
22
2.19
51.8
221 .1
1.13
28.1
8.18
23
6.06
1H.2
876.7
6.58
8.3
12.65
20
5.62
121.6
580 .1
5.11
11.2
5.92
25
2.16
01.5
179.2
1 .56
31.5
5.11
26
3.69
119.1
121 .5
0.56
17.1
13.38
27
6.16
160.5
617.0
5.35
9.9
7.61
28
? . 31
56.7
225.1
1 .28
27.6
7.50
29
6.1 7
129.1
821 .7
5.01
8.5
12.82
10
7,00
225.8
591 .9
1.78
9.2
6.61
31
2.27
11,1
202.8
1.21
31.7
6.21
32
3.60
116.1
328.9
0.50
16.9
15,29
SUM
3.92
100. 1
012. 1
3.71
10.5
6,06
HAG
o.oi
116.1
517.6
1.18
11."
6.81
33
0.83
11.1
86.1
0.07
61.3
2.10
30
9.53
316.2
1053.3
0.83
5.5
26.20
35
1.61
173.1
531.8
0.12
10.8
H.58
36
3,11
120,U
371 .8
0,30
15.5
6,11
37
2.51
51.6
316.1
0.71
21.7
3,19
38
2.25
17.1
183.8
1.11
21.2
3.16
39
2.61
27.1
033 .1
6.01
18.3
3.73
VEH YEAP MAKE m(IOL CID
012 197 3 PONT C»Ta OOO
CO
coa
NO*
HPG
HC
cn
CII?
MIX
NPG
80. 9
-------
APPENni* D.cnNi'n
LISTING OF M|)0«L RfSMLTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEH
oa3
mmdF
Ml.
HC
1
a, 21
2
1.31
3
6,76
a
3.36
5
2.61
6
2.00
7
3.22
8
2,77
9
3.20
1 0
2.98
1 1
U.28
12
" .23
1 3
a.85
1 "
3.ao
15
5.10
1 b
1 1 ,88
1 7
a.25
18
J.ba
19
3.98
20
a. 32
21
a. 79
22
a.77
23
6.6a
2a
3.98
25
3, aa
? 6
7,26
27
a . 86
28
a .56
29
6.23
30
a. 19
31
3.8a
32
8.56
SUM
3. 39
MAG
3.91
tn
51.6
61,0
91.2
5 3,1
11.5
25.0
78.9
5a.u
61.5
15.6
132.0
82.2
US. 2
66, 7
7 0.2
10 1.0
78,8
68.6
152.?
7 h, 0
73.1
Cn2
NOX
MPG
327 .5 2.23 20.a
121,2 2.82 16.6
577 .3 2 . 32 II. 9
357.1
3«b.9
30b. 1
2.2b 19.7
3.57 20.9
3.02 25.a
350.6 3.a5 18,3
3U2.0 5,al 20,3
350.0 5.19 19.2
317.8
355.9
a 12.5
383.7
308.3
287. i
528.9
28a.b
375.3
281 .9
usa.2
353.a
6.09 20.7
2.98 15.a
6.10 16.0
3. oa l a ,5
a. 12 20.9
2.03 18.8
2.05 9,0
1.69 19.5
2.95 17.9
2.06 19.5
3,67 15,0
2.21 1 a . 9
371.a a.2a u.o
152.6 2.61 12.6
322.a 2.a7 17.5
312.2
"22.2
368,7
a.la 20,6
2,8a 13.0
2.70 l a .8
3«8.u a.86 18,3
388.7 2. 1 3 1 a . 7
327.7 2.3b 16.7
3 39.0 a.90 19.0
IUS.6 3.38 12.1
67.5
93.6
313,9
352.9
a.30 19.3
3.92 17.3
nt Nvtw
YF AH
MAKE
MODL
CID
vEh
Yfc AW
MAKE
1973
VOL*
SF OA
97
015
1973
VOL*
rn
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
85.«
2a. o
5 /. 1
1 6. a
18.h
a.03
9.00
3.13
11.7
106.0
6 7.9
36 7 .9
a 3 1. 0
315.2
18.2
20. 1
10a.9
96.1
102.9
aoo . u
0.79
1,01
1.59
68.2
62,6
15.1
3.02
8.80
3.63
30.8
61 ,6
73,1
289.6
a 1 0.2
353.8
21.9
7a.6
103.3
85.5
aoi. 5
a51 .1
0. 79
1.13
1.30
71.2
16.8
H.2
a.68
8.0e
3. a3
W.I
105.8
71.9
311.1
380.5
529.3
15.2
17.5
76.2
106. 3
0.77
0.98
83.2
63.7
3.06
9, a5
38 ,6
77.2
306.2
391 .5
a 6. 1
58.0
239.5
228.6
2.92 27.9
2.61 27.2
2.70
1.90
37.1
53.2
313.3
3 32 .7
Ml IK
f P{,
33
0.38
2.5
35.5
0.07
218
0,25
1.6
21.9
0.02
296
0.91
11,8
25.7
o.oa
1 7 1
3a
3.79
25.0
158.2
0,53
17.1
2.93
55.6
316.3
0.29
21.5
1.62
177.6
aao.7
0.26
12. 1
35
2.60
16.2
315.7
1 .08
25.1
l.«7
23.2
211,1
0 ,16
31.8
2.59
67 . o
355.7
0.35
18,9
36
3.83
77.a
236.1
0.65
21.0
1.17
20.0
191.0
0.72
38.7
1 .02
16.9
216.3
0, a |
32. 1
37
2.13
ao,9
253.«
0.89
27 .1
l.H
22.9
205.8
1 .79
36.2
0.63
6.6
218.0
1.13
38.5
38
1 . 3b
10.a
315.1
3.22
26.1
1 .06
23.8
205. 1
3.07
36.1
0.58
3.2
219.1
2.60
<1.6
39
2.30
22. 1
360,7
8.80
22.0
1 . IS
33.3
231.7
1.27
30.5
0.51
2.3
297.a
3.52
29. i
EMISSION RESULTS in GRAMS PFP MILE
-------
APPE NO I X 0,CONT'D
LISTING UF MUDAL RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
YEAR
MA* E
MOtlL
CID
V£H
YEAR
HAKE
006
1972
BIJIC
SKYL
350
00 7
1972
BUI C
MIIDE
NO.
HC
LO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
C(l
C02
1
6.81
185. 1
UOl .5
0.7a
11.8
5.02
101.8
797.8
?
7.20
198,1
510.7
0.95
10.5
6,00
80. 1
789.7
3
12.10
290,9
789.1
1.20
6.9
8.36
117.9
1325.5
o
u, flu
136.3
055.7
1 .02
13.0-
3.15
57.1
766.5
5
0,011
123.9
390.3
l.«7
10.8
3.28
57.6
583.0
6
3.68
112.9
557 .7
l.oi
16.2
3.00
09.8
529,0
7
6.21
215.6
371 .8
1.08
12.2
5.86
209.0
552.1
A
0,9ft
165.5
391 .2
1 ."2
13.3
0.03
122,0
560 ,9
9
5.67
170.8
378.2
1 .66
13.0
3.60
102.9
153.7
10
5.17
129.6
013.8
2.15
10.0
2.71
62,0
615.7
1 1
6.27
262.0
002.9
0.89
10.6
7.03
302.B
611.2
12
6.20
193.2
079.2
2.72
11.1
0.10
113.6
269.3
1 3
8. 11
309.9
0 30 .9
0.99
9.0
6.98
317.1
653.3
10
0, 70
106. 1
382.2
1.91
10.2
3.25
95.0
220.8
15
7.09
125,5
0 13.1
1.1<>
1«.0
3.02
51.0
127,6
16
15.3U
297 .9
899.0
1.50
6.3
b.30
79.3
189.8
1 7
6,20
237 ,H
398.5
0,70
11.2
0,67
181 .9
016,5
IB
5.08
186.3
oou.8
1 .02
12."
0,06
1 32.7
312.1
19
5.37
165,8
391.1
0.99
13.3
3,60
99.5
201 .0
20
6.96
227.0
070.0
1.02
10.0
5.20
I 73.8
011.1
21
11.07
380.«
0 1 0 .9
0.53
e.5
8.72
357.2
598.1
22
8.00
236.0
050.7
1 .66
10,0
0.58
108.2
719.0
23
10.37
230.7
602. S
1.61
8.8
0.92
111.5
903.9
20
5.35
205.2
371.6
1 .08
12.5
5.81
195.6
017.6
25
14.62
161.2
370.7
1 .65
13,8
2.92
108.3
570.8
26
11.07
201 .7
551.5
1.01
9.8
0.51
72.3
851 .5
27
6.60
289.2
002.8
0.73
10.1
7 .66
317.9
622.9
?B
b. 30
168.0
397.0
1.58
13.0
2.95
83,6
661 .5
29
8.62
197.7
507.9
1 .06
10.0
o. 1 0
86,8
898.7
30
5.70
232,3
366. 1
0.80
11.8
6 ,66
256.7
505.2
31
5.56
198,2
395.0
1,53
12.3
3,62
105,2
607.1
32
1 1.92
237 ,1
557.7
1.33
9.2
5,18
91 .5
90O.5
MOOL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
cm
CENT
055
018
1 972
CHFV
VEGA
100
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CI12
NIJX
MPG
2.95
3.70
1.11
9.1
9.5
5.8
1 .15
2.07
3.81
0 ?. 9
68. 1
52.0
303,6
362.3
073.0
1.12
0.91
1.21
23,6
18.6
15.7
3.70
5.56
0,00
10.2
13.0
1 u.o
1.73
1 .26
1.16
50.0
35.3
28.8
373 . 5
306. 1
195.6
0.7 3
1 .66
1 ,06
19.0
21.3
36,3
3.20
1.51
5.00
9.2
1 1,6
16.B
1 .96
1 .86
1 .51
09.9
63.9
19.1
?6o . o
221.9
215.1
l.io
1,16
1 .72
25.0
26.0
28.0
1.72
1 .85
5.27
12.3
7.6
19.3
1.17
2,81
2.51
36.9
97.3
62.6
227.2
289.0
286.9
1 .30
1 ,30
1 .75
30.3
19.7
22.6
2.70
o.n
2.81
7.6
23.3
00.5
3.89
1.81
1.33
109.6
55. 7
53.0
275.7
218.3
258.8
1 .25
1.13
0.62
19.1
28.5
20.9
3.90
2,05
3.05
26.5
12.0
16.6
6.51
2.30
2.11
61,1
68. 1
71.1
519.9
?6l . 7
325. 1
1 . 08
1.23
1 .00
15.9
23.6
20.0
2.32
3.02
1.59
21.7
12.7
7.5
2.16
2.30
3.21
35.5
69.6
76.6
269.5
365.9
230. J
1 . /I
1 .23
0.80
26. 7
18.0
20.6
3.59
1.58
2.88
9.2
7.8
11.9
2.33
3.70
1.75
108,6
83.1
57.H
259,9
316.2
281 . 3
0 ,92
1.53
2.17
20.1
18.5
21.5
3.09
3.59
2.31
11.8
9.1
7.7
1.00
6.68
2.88
19.9
76. 3
76, 3
211 .7
325.6
290 ,6
1.10
0 .80
2,00
28.2
19.0
21.0
3.81
0.03
2.50
11.1
8.5
9.2
1.61
2.62
1 .62
51.0
57. 1
63,2
211, r<
313.0
282.8
1.17
1 .08
2.01
26.9
20.6
22.9
3.59
1.53
10.5
0.3
1.65
6.21
66.5
80.6
213.1
365.6
1.23
0.98
?5 ,i
17.3
SUM U.95 157.1
RAG 6.70 227.1
"11.3
125. 1
1.72 13,2
1.23 11.0
3,61 106.5 578.3
<1.56 179.0 65«. 6
6.05 11.7
3.59 9.3
l.7«
2.37
08,8
72.6
250.1 1.09 26,7
263.5 1.33 23.1
33
0.77
21.1
67.6
0.03
86.0
0,57
5.0
1 36.5
0.21
60.7
0.11
5.8
28. 1
0.01
232
30
8.82
261 .5
800, 0
0.36
7.2
5,81
55.9
1516.0
2.12
5.0
0,25
75.0
767 .9
0.93
9.9
35
5.71
213.8
1116,0
0,02
6 . 0
2,36
19.9
883. 1
1.39
9.6
0.97
19.6
062.7
0.12
17.9
36
0.10
190.7
099.0
0,03
10.8
0.83
6.7
879.0
2.09
9.9
0,65
8.8
267. 1
0. 31
31.1
37
2.«1
62,9
329.1
0.70
20.0
1.88
3.5
179.7
1.01
18.1
0,66
7.6
171.1
1 .20
07,9
38
2.50
68.5
301.2
1.65
19,0
1.71
5.9
532.0
10,00
16.2
0.90
26. 1
182.7
1.72
19. 1
39
2.38
60,6
105.5
3.52
17.5
1.29
13.1
590.8
13.27
10,0
0.89
31.1
233. 1
1 .99
31.1
frlSSIflN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONMMY In miles per gallon (MINUTES PER GALLON FUR IDLE)
FuFL FCOnUMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON Tl) HYDROGEN RATIU
d 77
-------
APPFNPIX D,CUNT'D
LISTING IIF M(10»L RESULTS (IN INDIVIDUAL VI-HICLFS
VEh
year
009
1972
HOOF
NO.
HC
Cn
1
6.68
101.0
2
6. 38
117.7
3
9.95
Ml.3
1
*.72
61.1
5
2.57
50.1
6
2,18
U 5, 9
7
2.29
39. 3
8
2,37
7 J. 5
4
2.28
00.5
1 0
2.88
59. 1
1 1
3.81
13.7
12
3. 55
59.1
1 3
3.<>2
61. 1
11
2.50
33. 3
15
5.73
62.6
16
1 1 .93
117.0
17
1.39
63.9
18
5.21
59.3
19
3.60
50.1
20
3.82
81.5
21
1.20
96. 1
22
3.75
97,0
23
6. t 3
113.7
?u
3.00
60 . U
25
2.33
37.3
26
6.39
115.1
27
3.91
81 .5
28
3.03
55.0
29
1.76
95.3
30
3.22
76,1
31
2.69
55.0
3?
9.26
125.0
MAnF MflDL cm
CHEV NOVA 250
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
OF NVfc R
YF AR
MAKE
MfJOL
CIO
VEH
YEAP
MAKE
MODL
— - -
- - -
- . -
» - _ -
- - - -
1972
:: r v
\ [' v s
307
051
1972
CHtV
ImH>4
en
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
Cll
CU2
Nil*
105.1
115,0
122,0
572.6
591 .6
1016.8
1.69
1.12
2.15
11.6
11.1
7.1
7.69
S, 16
8.81
131 .0
67. 1
102,5
619.8
700,8
1050.0
0 .06
1,68
5. 05
111,0
1 13.5
92.1
619.9
183,0
117,2
3.96
3.88
2.71
10.8
li.O
15.3
3,88
3.18
2.80
33.5
36.8
30.3
680.0
591 .3
508.1
6.69
7.11
5 . 91
1 6 3 # 7
109,9
87 , 1
020.2
329.2
365.7
2.69
1.61
2.96
12.5
17.1
17.1
6.50
1.11
5.28
H3. 1
65.1
112.8
538. 1
558.9
510,6
i. /;
6.50
5.11
70,7
165.9
121.0
350,0
019.2
133.2
2.01
2.06
2.20
18.0
12.6
13.8
1. 38
6.16
5.26
52.7
172.0
69.3
509. 1
515.1
610.1
6. 81
3,5«
7.93
158.5
91,7
mo.5
068.7
331.3
119.7
2.7/
1.71
1 .21
1 1 .9
17.9
11.7
6.95
3.91
5.91
171.7
56.0
02.3
573.8
069. 3
136,0
1,86
5.51
2.80
188,3
153,3
101,0
897.0
129,9
370.2
1 .52
1.11
1.16
7.1
12.7
16,0
12.60
5.12
3.65
171.0
70,0
56.5
8/1.9
093.0
582. 3
2.56
6. 06
1. 57
115.1
137.1
223.0
387.1
030. 1
109.9
1.13
1 . 06
1 .86
15.0
13.2
11.2
1.87
0.68
5.87
68.5
81.6
179,6
ou5. 1
679.7
508.8
3.61
0.17
S , KU
129.0
136.2
150.8
101,7
573.B
001 .0
1 ,65
1 .63
2.29
H.l
10.8
13.1
5. 9U
7.71
3,92
95. 1
77. 3
83,2
609 , U
705.9
517,0
6.08
7. 71
5.21
95,9
121.2
199,6
335,9
519.2
395. 1
1 .56
1 .22
1 . 31
17.6
12.0
12.0
3.73
8.30
5.21
55. 1
68.9
1 39.9
096. 3
617 . 1
536.0
6.0 i
1. 2ft
5.81
96,2
115.0
Hfl.6
306.6
535, 1
001.5
1 .37
1 .15
2.21
I'.l
11.2
13.5
5.12
6.77
1.69
52.3
72. 1
1 30.2
529.2
683.0
513.6
6.0 J
7.21
3.52
107, J
103.0
365.8
537 ,9
1.63
1 .29
16.1
12.2
1 .06
8,86
70.9
83.1
50 7 .8
615. 3
6.05
5.95
99.5
1 38.9
391 .5
111,5
2.03
2.01
15,/
13.5
3.96 63.3
0.29 101.5
517.3
565. 1
5.76 :
5.57 I
MPG
108. I
503.5
780. 1
351.7
276.6
285. I
27?.5
315.7
300 .7
3«5.2
JUS.3
"73.0
036. 1
JU7.9
102.9
792.3
32".2
366.2
293,0
039.0
JUS.2
H7.7
532.9
355.6
311 .9
572.0
396. 0
388,6
097.5
361.8
355.2
552.0
1 .76 15.0
1.20 M.7
1,57 ft,6
1.16 19,1
2.21 21.0
1.71 2i.o
2.30 26.0
3.22 20.2
5.03 23.9
3,95 21,3
5.10 ?n.e
6,30 16.3
6.37 16.1
1.60 21,7
1.91 17.1
J.01 8.0
3.60 20,2
2.62 1 ft,9
2,16 23.1
2.30 15.2
2,07 17.3
3.56 15.2
3.31 12.1
1.71 19.3
1.21 21."
2.67 11.5
1,5" 16,5
3.60 16.J
2.60 13.1
5.12 17.9
3.61 19,7
7.50 11.1
6,03
5.01
5,18
5.16
5.28
6.26
9.26
9,8
7.2
11.3
7.5
SUM
RAI,
2.73 18.6 HO,u 1.07 17.9
3.27 72.0 370.5 3.82 18,0
5.55
3 3
0.11
3.1
90.0
0.07
88.2
0,10
0.6
96,9
0 . 05
80.3
0.52
6.7
71.3
0,07
1 06
31
5.(it)
53.7
1070.0
5.«l
7.6
6.29
05.7
1157.3
1 .29
7.1
6,16
63. 1
889. 1
1 .00
8,8
35
2.12
27.5
569.1
0.11
11.3
2.13
20.0
77 7 .7
0.76
10.9
2.60
21.6
833.5
1.09
10.1
36
1 .50
22.5
361. 3
0.31
21.9
1.91
17.0
567 . i
0.91
10.8
3.71
62. 0
686. 7
3. 30
11.2
37
1 .50
U0.1
231.6
O.UJ
29.3
2.26
31 .0
299.0
0.63
25.0
2,05
6.9
387.6
2.79
21.9
JH
1.67
38.5
261.1
2.39
27.1
3.27
53,8
303.2
2,21
22.3
1 .85
11.2
355.1
0.32
25,1
39
1 .36
15.0
591 .6
7.33
10.3
3.39
65.9
318.5
3.03
20.5
1 .96
11.9
180, 1
8.97
17.6
emission mfsults in grams pm milf (per minute for iolej
Fuel FCMNMMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PFR GAlLnN FOR I0LF )
FIlFL FCQNPi'y CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO H YDROGF N RATIO
.2/ t)
-------
APPENDIX D.CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
Vfc H YE AR
OS? 1972
MAKE MODL CID
CMEV NOVA 350
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
051 1972 CHEV IMPA 350
VEH YEAH MAKE MODL CID
051 1972 CHE V STAW 000
MODE
NO.
HC
CM
C02
NO*
mpc.
HC
C(1
COS
NOX
mpg
HC
CO
C02
NCI*
1P[,
1 12.6? 163.6
2 9.80 196,0
3 16.66 266.0
o
5
h
7
A
9
10
1 1
12
11
10
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2«
25
26
27
2ft
29
30
31
32
8.86 186.1
5.60 11".8
5.28 95.5
8,21 161,2
6.78 1710)
7.17 112.1
6.66 101,u
8.67 211,7
8.<13 15«,7
10.26 223,8
6.65 137.0
12.26 118.1
10.6U 101.6
9.59 206.1
7.16 165,5
10.77 185,5
9,71 201,1
10,61 261,3
9.16 201.8
12.88 171.1
6.71 160.1
6.17 128,1
11.61 170.7
8.11 202.1
8.21 119.8
12.50 201.3
7.96 218.0
7,01 190.1
17.01 212.«
611.6
529.9
695.1
135.B
«20.9
190.3
381.7
UIO.8
101.6
110.2
152.2
515. u
111 .6
391.2
385.5
718.6
369.1
126.8
385.1
166,1
105,5
171.0
568,5
110.5
116,8
511.1
132.0
138.1
519.7
391.7
396.5
516.2
1,03 9.7
1,11 10,2
1.10 7.1
1.53 11.7
1.11 10.3
2.17 15.9
1.90 11.1
3.15 12.6
1.10 10.7
1,13 10,5
1.90 10.9
1.17 11.0
2.53 10.7
2.91 1«,1
1.63 13,8
1.80 6.0
2.21 12.3
1.58 12,5
1.70 12,5
1.59 10,6
1.16 10.1
2.81 10,9
1.11 10,1
2,70 13.0
1.20 11.9
2.05 10,1
2.22 11.1
2.89 13,0
2.17 10.1
1.17 11.6
2.10 12.1
1.81 9.8
10.11 231,0
1.10 96.1
8.51 161.7
1.21 111.2
l.«5 167.7
3.63 31,9
9.27 306,8
7.18 36.3
5.70 186.5
5.67 17,8
9.31 370,6
7.17 57,1
11.79 351.5
6.91 38,1
5.97 63,1
11.15 122.1
10.96 110.1
7.01 61,9
10.18 251.1
8.12 80.2
11.77 128.9
8.61 70.5
8.76 212,2
9.27 317.7
9.15 19.5
9.52 106.6
9.91 326.1
6.81 71.5
9.10 278.8
9.11 171.7
10.18 12.2
9.50 117.9
915. 1
306,1
815,9
751.1
602.1
201.8
716.1
*280.1
601.1
280. 1
7 37 ,6
282, I
675.2
211 .5
287.0
529.7
671.8
259. 1
611.9
302.2
8H.8
179. 1
912, 1
591.«
178.8
250. 1
665.9
190,9
811.6
698.9
158.2
216.2
1,16 6.7
0,09 18..fl
2.08 6.1
1.80 9,1
2,61 10.1
0.52 12.9
2.22 7.1
0.92 20.7
3.53 9.7
1.31 21.8
1.93 6.6
0.80 22.5
1.76 7,0
1.63 27.1
0.35 21.9
0.51 8.2
1.71 7.1
0.60 21.2
1.66 8.5
0,66 19,5
2.16 5.8
0,61 28,0
1.51 6.8
1.27 7.9
1.06 12.8
0.11 19,7
1.61 7.1
0,80 26,8
2.22 6.8
1.62 6.7
1.11 31.6
0.00 19.7
6.87 105.0 725.7
6.61 89,6 765.5
9.92 61.1 1260.9
1,51 15.U 711.6
1,90 6?.7 622.0
<1,09 52.9 198,7
6.18 218.6 575.2
5.88 161,1 521.7
6.51 179.1 552.8
6.60 112.1 527.1
7.95 292.1 591.5
8.67 195.8 655,9
9.06 111,0 657,9
6.11 116,6 181.2
6.99 107.0 516,1
15.20 211.5 1181.1
6.12 201.9 568.1
6.19 118.2 605.6
5.20 116.1 555.6
7.25 152.0 708.2
9.11 381.3 595.2
9.55 252,6
10,1b 188,3
5.61 169.3
6,36 156,9
10,81 160,0
7.57 263.0
7.22 118.2
8.17 131.0
6.71 265.1
6,98 198,0
11.10 201,0
572 . 7
881 .6
555.0
188.7
755.9
609.3
517.5
820 .6
566.1
503.7
760.7
1.67 9,7
1.92 9.6
6.07 6.2
6.20 11,1
6.90 12.1
6.29 10.9
5.31 9.1
0.08 11.1
5.82 10.u
5.15 11.7
1.20 8.2
5.31 9.0
1,50 7.5
3.95 12.1
1.16 12.2
1.80 5.7
2.93 9.7
1.21 10.5
3.38 11.3
1.69 9,2
2.00 7.3
2.93 8,9
6.91 7.3
3.96 10.6
1. 05
1.62
3.71
11.7
8.5
8.5
1.01 11.0
6.06 8,1
2.98 8,8
3.65 10.6
3.86 7.9
SUM 6.60 126.0 130.8 3.61 13.6
BAG 8,10 188.8 051.9 2.86 11.0
6.08 101.0
6.91 183.6
053.1
511.5
2.01 12,8
1.65 10,8
5.90 108.9
6.85 205,3
071.9
605.5
5.01 12.2
0.19 9.3
33
2.31
51.6
126.3
0,59
0 1,0
1.01
33.0
52.6
O.OO
81.8
0,66
1.0
108.0
0.21
76.2
30
10.20
165.8
786. 1
0,53
6.2
9.35
290, 1
199,0
0.16
9.0
6,67
37.0
1306.1
1.55
6.1
15
7.97
162.0
560.9
l.«3
10,5
5.85
179.2
380.7
0.31
13.0
2.87
12.3
657,0
0,71
12.9
36
3.21
51.0
115.1
0.35
17.6
3.90
118.6
351 .3
0.32
16.1
2.08
2o.o
606.9
1 . 06
13.6
37
2.71
38,2
289.8
1.11
21,8
2.63
15.8
135.3
0.65
21.0
2.01
6,6
039.9
6.09
19,1
18
3.01
32.0
351,2
1.39
21.6
2,80
53.1
356,0
1.07
19.8
3.32
11. J
171.1
8.31
36.0
39
3.15
37.1
025.7
7 .61
16.0
3.01
12.7
132.7
0.30
17.0
5.09
130.0
177.8
6.16
21.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUF L ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIU
-------
APPfNDIX D.CUNT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLFS
(If NVtR
VtH
055
MIJOF
NO.
Hf*
1
1.18
2
1.51
3
6.19
0
3.20
5
1.77
6
1 .31
7
2.16
8
2.21
9
2.27
1 0
1 .95
1 1
3.95
12
2.96
1 3
3.17
1 u
2.02
15
1.91
1 6
11.88
1 7
3.53
18
1.99
19
1.5i
20
2.76
21
3.50
22
2.89
23
5.90
2i
2.H
25
1 .86
26
8.11
27
3.21
28
1 .86
29
5.33
10
2.18
11
1 . 75
32
6.50
SUM
2.n ;
HAG
2.9i ;
33
0.52
10
i.ii
15
?.ii
3b
1 .97
37
0.58
38
0.81
year
1 "5 7 2
cn
MAKE MOPL CIO
OATS SEOA 97
V t" H YFAP MAKE hOOL C1D
056 1972 DODG DART 118
VFH YFAR MAKE MODI rin
057 19 7 2 fVJDG PiIL A 560
CH2
NCI X
MPG
HC
cn
Co2
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
59.7
10, i
15.5
29. 2
8. 6
0.7
27.1
J6.1
21.0
13,5
59.3
2S.5
06, 3
16.7
21.9
76.2
35.5
10.6
27.0
1 1 .9
7a,0
2"».7
16,2
12.B
H.2
32.2
31 .5
8.5
n. 3
17.1
27.6
UO , 6
20,9
28.6
210.3
221.5
U51.1
320. 1
112.8
263.2
276.2
228.8
259.5
237.3
273.5
283.1
313.5
215.7
201 .0
151 . 3
271 .2
318.2
266.1
319.9
291 ,9
277.5
331.2
287.9
227. 1
337.7
315.3
210.2
307.2
269.5
211 .«
310.5
26S.0
271 .7
2.57 25,5
1,68 29,1
1.13 16.3
3.H 23.6
1.77 26.7
2.32 32.3
2.66 27.2
2.97 30.3
1.36 29.6
1.22 11,5
1.97 21.1
1.55 26.9
5.86 22,3
3.26 35.3
1.13 30.0
1.56 11.1
5.10 26.3
3.20 26.0
1.73 27,5
1.88 23.5
3.12 21.2
1.07 26.6
1.85 21.0
5.80 2fl.2
3.50 31.8
2.07 21.1
7.91 21,7
3.60 13.7
1.37 22.5
5.59 27,5
1.66 30,6
2.58 20,9
1.83 29,1
1.29 27.2
39
0.85
6.7
72. 1
13.6
23.9
0.1
7.8
5.0
17.1 0,01 303
351.6 0.11 18.6
11H.7 0.75 17.1
293.5 0.58 26.3
8.19 131.1
7.39 118,1
12.35 229.5
5.66 1H.3
1.06 61,1
3.17 15.1
5.18 85.7
1.36 101,7
5.01 86,5
5.10 85.2
6.86 168.5
7,30 119,9
8.11 190.5
5.00 100.5
7.85 105.1
19.15 311.1
6.81 182.8
5.7a llfi.l
7.11 181.0
7.80 117,2
8,06 185.1
7.71 155.U
13.83 219.5
5.76 H2.8
5.16 105,8
13.11 166.1
7,60 199.7
7.95 121.1
15.35 193.0
5.86 155,2
5,65 110,1
16.02 191.5
191, 0
500.1
708.8
118.6
376.5
138. 7
363.0
H6.3
153.5
153.1
185.1
U17.6
119.9
116. 1
135.7
715.3
181.8
392.5
373.5
151, 1
110,8
129. 1
528.2
358. I
353. 1
501.2
189. 3
190. 7
181.2
160.1
156.6
188.7
1.71 11,2
1.22 11.7
1.60 8.0
1.69 11.7
2.17 18.1
I.99 21.1
2.10 17.1
1.97 1 /.1
2.23 17.6
2,00 17.6
1.17 11,2
1.91 12.6
1.53 11.9
1.71 17.1
0,77 16.9
1.75 6.7
1.00 12.8
1.5? 11.9
0.78 13.0
1.65 12,5
1.56 12.2
1.73 12.7
1.19 9.7
1.3« 11.8
1.73 16.6
1.31 11.0
1.15 12.2
1.51 11.6
1.31 10.6
0.99 ]i|,2
1.10 11.9
0.88 10.6
261. 3
221.1
212.3
0.96 31,8
2,18 37.3
5.01 16.5
5.76 118.2 171.7 1.79 15.1
6.77 150.0 390.7 1.72 11.7
1.75 16.1 11,1 0.02 83.1
11.71 100.5 611.8 0,28 6.9
5.92 207.6 111.2 0.27 11.1
1.12 115,9 361,5 0,26 15,0
2.88 13,6 290,3 0.79 21,1
3.21 11,9 129,7 2.86 21.6
1.90 66.6 352.2 2.61 17.6
11.9} 112,6
9.51 168,0
10.11 6911,1
1.16 121.8
7.96 315.8
7.27 268.9
9.05 3H.6
6.73 26U.5
7,72 278.6
8.23 272.7
10.7u 308.u
11.22 183.1
12.95 151.1
9.35
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING fJF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEH MftKE MODL CID
058 1972 FllRD PINT 12?
DENVER
VEH YEAH MAKE MODL CID
059 1972 FORD MAVE 302
VEH *FAR make moDL CID
060 1972 FORD TORI 3b 1
MODE
NO.
HC
cn
CP2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
cn
CII2
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
3."3
2.85
5.09
32.5
37.3
65.0
316.5
362,5
508.0
4.66
4,34
3,48
23.4
20,6
1«.2
4.83
4.76
7.34
45.6
38.1
100.6
545.3
545.1
806.7
7 .26
3.91
2.81
14.0
1«.3
9.0
7.69
6,42
13.08
144.3
76.2
126.7
662,5
597.2
1038.2
4.36
4,07
5.37
9.7
12.0
6.9
4
5
6
2.53
2.24
1 .86
30.6
29.9
26.4
314,8
291 .7
248.3
5.16
5,62
3,87
23.9
25.7
30. 0
3.59
3.08
3.14
"7.1
27.9
24.8
457,9
404 ,7
339,0
3.26
6.22
3.56
16.3
19.4
22.9
6.15
4.09
3.58
76,6
55.5
36.2
539.5
462.1
385.4
5.77
6.51
5.88
13.1
15.8
19.6
7
e
9
2.71
2.02
2.33
46.8
44.7
41.9
295.5
290.3
285.4
5,07
4,41
6.15
23.5
2«.2
24. 7
3.74
3.33
3.66
62.4
17.6
30.0
398. 1
349. 1
385.8
4.30
3.86
7.73
17.5
20.4
20.0
4.88
4,92
5,06
143.2
80.9
78.0
453.0
410.5
436. 1
4.33
5.86
7,03
12.B
16.0
15.4
10
11
12
2.1"
2.86
2.56
35.6
69. 1
53.6
288.7
306.0
356.5
4.95
5.39
5.41
25.3
20.9
19.8
3.65
a.23
4.85
32.2
76.0
56.7
377.2
409.1
465.6
«.71
5.05
5.05
20.2
16.4
15.6
6.15
5.84
6.93
49.4
1 79.7
86. 1
443.6
471.6
553.2
7.32
3.32
8,14
16.4
11.5
12.5
13
14
15
J.29
2.03
3,02
80.5
42.4
35,0
345.9
274.1
277. 1
5.80
4.05
3.01
18,4
25.6
26.0
4.83
3.75
4,88
75.0
43,4
60,9
485.0
337.1
353,6
6.24
3.45
1,50
14.4
21.3
19.1
7.24
5.26
6.28
176.7
75.2
64. 3
546.5
420.8
448.3
5.01
6.15
3.18
10.5
16.0
15.6
16
17
18
6.65
2.75
2.30
93.0
61.7
38.9
542.4
300,0
310.8
3.61
5.23
4.53
12.5
21.9
23.4
10.28
4,20
4. 30
193.1
85,8
58,2
397.3
395.6
402.4
1.74
4,76
3.29
12.1
16.3
17.5
13.01
5.10
4 .64
1 38. 1
<>5.5
71.7
1007.7
490.4
482.5
3.55
5.56
6.12
7.0
13.5
14.6
19
20
21
2.59
2.74
2.8b
4 7,6
42,fl
81,8
273.3
364.9
356,8
3.76
5,30
5.85
24.9
20. 1
18.0
3,68
5.48
5.25
69.8
69.2
167.3
337,9
460,8
402,8
3.90
3,70
3.25
19.3
15.1
13,0
4,99
6.00
6,37
100. 1
79.2
181.8
424.9
551 .3
491.0
i.4B
6,37
3.66
14.8
1 2.B
11.1
22
23
?4
2.60
1.15
2.24
46.5
54.7
58.2
321.5
426.7
282.4
4,65
5.96
4.84
21.9
16.9
23.3
5.31
7.21
3.67
82,0
128.3
57.9
426.2
503.0
369.4
3.67
3.06
5.90
15.5
12.2
18. B
7.53
10.39
4,84
109. 4
121.5
116,1
518.5
695.5
432.2
6.03
7.72
4.51
12.4
9.7
14.1
25
26
27
1 .98
4.51
2.73
44, 1
54.0
69,7
268,7
381 .0
326,5
3.94
3,94
6.49
25,6
18.5
20.0
3.73
7.75
4.23
46.0
123.6
79.1
355.1
494.7
403.9
3.33
2.01
5.06
20.2
12.4
16.4
4.61
7.72
4 .90
72.4
89.7
122.4
406.2
655.6
510. H
5.62
4 .09
h, 08
16.6
1 O.B
1 t. 4
28
29
30
2.36
3.82
2.35
38,6
59.6
59, 4
291.6
396.7
305.0
4,62
6.19
5.94
21.7
17.7
21.9
4.57
6.22
3,43
57.8
127.0
61,8
382.2
722.3
374.2
2.82
2.86
6.57
18.2
9.4
1«.4
6,22
12.58
5,64
70,4
112,6
139.2
44 7 .6
667.0
431.8
5.14
6,7b
4.15
15.4
10.0
11.3
31
32
2.0U
3.95
"3.5
"7,3
284.0
380.1
4.52
".51
2«.7
19,0
3.77
7,16
48.7
95.1
377.6
525.4
3.34
2.22
19.0
12.7
5.47
8.7 U
86,5
104. 3
411.6
6 36. 3
5.OB
3.73
15.7
10.7
SUM
HAG
2.18
2,111
37.0
60.0
297.2
301 .9
5,36 24,5
5.02 22.0
3,61 53.0 309.2 1,11 10,3
11,18 69.4 404,5 4.44 16,B
4.9B 81.*1
5,77 110.0
468.6 5.91 14,5
49 t.7 5. 72 1 3 .0
33
0.26
2.7
34.2
0.02
225
0.68
18.0
67.9
0.05
90.3
1 .31
15.7
105,7
0.17
66.0
34
3.07
18,0
464.2
0.22
17.7
8.34
239.2
882.0
1.49
6.9
12,74
94,4
1350,1
2.07
5.8
35
1 .85
". 2
333.7
0.48
25.6
3.50
91.3
625,7
0.53
11.«
6,73
34. 1
675.1
1 .02
11,8
36
1 .73
13.3
263.5
1.23
30.6
2.02
43.8
460,6
0.47
16.6
5.08
3«.s
523.5
0.76
14.9
37
1.50
11.6
228.6
4.36
35.3
1.80
26.0
283,7
0.66
26.9
2.30
14.9
360.6
2.51
22.7
38
1 ."5
12.1
252.8
5.76
32.1
2.42
16.6
312,3
3.63
25.6
3.51
28.0
583.6
8.56
20.2
39
1 .51
16.6
286.9
7.03
27.9
2.67
29.6
357,2
5.40
21.5
3.21
59.5
427.6
8,50
16.7
EMISSION RESULTS In GRAMS PFR MILF (PER MINUTE FOW IOLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON f-OH IDLE)
FUEL ECONDMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A Hl.BS CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2til
-------
APPfunix n.ciJNT'o
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS l)N INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
DFNVER
VEH
061
MonE
NO.
HC
1
5.16
2
5.51
3
8.65
u
3.98
5
5.12
6
3.13
7
1 . 56
8
5,86
9
1.10
10
1.13
1 1
5.15
12
5.65
13
5.89
11
1.12
15
5.26
16
11.70
1 7
1.73
18
1.82
19
1. 36
20
5.68
21
5.56
22
5.20
23
6.72
21
1.22
25
1.21
26
8.21
27
5.18
28
5.15
29
6.91
30
1.88
31
1.71
52
8. 31
SUM
1.31 I
HAG
1.95 1
33
0.62
31
6.58
35
3.29
36
2.21
37
2.17
38
1.09
MAKE MnOL CID
FORD STA* 351
VEH YEAR MAKE «um CIO
062 |97? FnRD LTD
cn
C02
NO»
MPG
HC
CD
Cl>2
nox
UOO
MPG
VEH YEAR MAKE MIIOL C IU
063 197? FOWD THUN 129
HC
CO
CU
-------
APPEnDTX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH YEAR
060 1972
MAKE MUDL CID
LINC CONT 160
VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CID
065 1972 MERC MONT <100
VEH YEAR MAKE MIIDL CID
066 1972 OLDS CUTl 350
MnDE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
1
2
3
9.32
A.31
16.10
218,5
136.7
310.3
635.0
585.1
928,0
5.12
5,07
1.81
6.8
10.7
6,1
1.20
1.29
7.11
50.6
51,9
101.1
678.0
805.6
1197.6
8.79
8.50
7.22
11.5
">.8
6.1
1.7i
8,99
11,61
<1
5
6
5.97
3.98
3.79
118.2
70. U
55.3
568.1
527.2
150.2
5.01
7.30
6.20
U.5
13.6
16,0
3.79
3.26
3.80
71,2
08.6
02.2
599.0
531.6
512.1
6,51
9.63
7,91
12.3
H.3
15.0
1.35
0.29
1.31
7
ft
9
6.25
5.71
5.91
211,2
171.0
152.8
192.2
167.7
189. J
5.51
5.36
7.50
10.5
11 .8
1 1 .9
5,36
1,66
5.28
120.2
1 16.8
99.0
516.6
563.7
518.8
7.00
8.78
9.90
12.2
1 1.6
12.3
6,93
5,81
6.22
10
1 1
12
6.2«
9.98
8.86
127.0
363,0
218,9
511.5
060.7
609,1
6.62
3.08
6.87
12.1
8.3
9.0
5,60
6,60
6.28
58.9
225.5
120.1
615,9
567,7
709.7
1 1 .29
5.60
12,11
12.2
9.1
9.2
5.75
9.32
8,69
13
10
15
9.65
5.82
10.oj
260,9
100,6
122,9
b15 ¦ 9
<160,0
156.0
7.79
5.62
2.92
8.2
12.5
13.0
6,81
5.33
6.61
211.9
97. 7
87 . 0
675.6
539.8
530.9
8,21
7.65
1.01
8.6
12.5
12.9
12.57
7.28
8.20
16
17
18
23.73
7.26
5,00
322.8
153,5
111,8
839.7
S20 .8
603.1
3.01
6,57
6,30
6,2
11.3
11.1
12.71
0.89
1,9(1
210.9
121.3
93.1
10O7.1
398.3
627.2
3.16
8.89
7.63
6.3
11.7
11.2
17.13
10.05
8.55
19
20
21
6.60
7.53
12.27
103.2
188.0
009.1
001 .9
653.7
509.8
0.65
5.08
2.70
12.9
9.1
7.1
4.28
5,99
6.52
83.2
115.0
205,2
515.0
723.7
623,7
7.89
8.05
5.98
13.5
9.6
f.z
8.81
8,55
11.27
22
23
21
".50
10.26
5.03
239.0
217.0
159, I
565.8
771 .9
518.3
5.08
8.27
6.28
9.1
7.1
11.3
7.17
8.71
0.67
198,2
181,6
129.0
651. J
HOU . 1
550,1
8. 11
7.7H
7.02
9.0
7.7
11.5
9.5ft
11.01
9.59
25
26
27
0.90
11,50
8,87
123.9
170,7
282,3
097.5
690.5
558.5
6.18
5.28
5.35
12.5
8.8
8.6
1.95
10,03
5,69
119.9
152,8
161.1
521,3
738,5
606.0
7.H
5.28
8.06
12.2
8,8
10.1
9.22
10.70
10,53
28
29
30
7. 76
13.03
5.98
211.9
210.1
201.9
516.2
701 .6
098.5
5.18
6.28
5.26
10,2
8.3
10.6
7,06
10.19
5.72
108,9
198.3
H1.9
587,9
706.7
512.8
7.92
6 .69
5.71
11.0
8.1
11.3
7.77
1 1 .25
12.53
31
32
6. 36
10.30
190.9
207.5
502.9
693.7
5.03
0.51
10.8
8.3
5.55
10.13
159,0
170.0
550.3
701.0
6.70
5.15
10.8
8.5
8.12
10.75
SUM
BAG
5,97 150.9
fl,00 221 .9
501.7
510. 7
5.00
5.20
11.6
9.7
1.83
5.89
100.6
151.3
591.8
633.1
8.55
7,58
1 1 .6
10,0
6.20
8.90 i
CO
C02
NOX
mPG
06.1
I 10.6
66,1
169,3
179.6
595.9
905.7
188.5
390. J
383.8
376.1
« i9 , 6
385 • 6
160. 3
J81 .6
53 7. S
059.8
390. 1
*139,2
950, 3
370 ,9
400.0
391. 1
181 ,6
153.8
ueo.3
661.7
368. 3
389.3
615.3
396.2
(lb 1 . 7
617.1
365.0
(109,2
611.8
1.02 11,5
2.16 10.1
2.23 7.6
2.66 15.u
2.23 15.3
2.82 16,7
2.11 12./
1.5B 13.0
~.58 13.3
~.86 u.a
1 .1 1 10.1
5.16 9.9
1.53 8.6
2.76 12.9
1.71 13,7
2.05 6.0
o.iiu 10,1
1 .53 11.5
0.69 11.2
2.3d 10,7
1.32 9,0
3.30 10.j
3.37 9.2
1.2B 10,7
2.31 H.O
2.90 10.0
0.91 9.6
3.35 12.0
3.22 9.3
1.07 9.5
2.88 12.0
2.20 8.1
0.13 IU.5
33
1 . 09
30.1
62.9
0.07
72.9
0.98
28,1
98.9
0,15
60,7
0.65
10.3
88.1
0.05
8 3,2
30
16.26
000.3
782.9
0.10
6.0
7.33
175.6
1317,2
1 .30
5.5
5.82
60.8
1107.2
0.57
7.2
35
7,78
207.5
130.0
0 . 20
1 1.1
3.11
63,0
676,5
0,67
11.3
2.51
26. 1
750,2
0.55
11.1
36
1. 21
126.5
315.3
0.29
15.9
2.09
53. 1
537 .8
0,79
11.1
1.08
3.5
531.2
0.56
16.3
37
2.11
16.2
360 .1
2.H
20 .0
2.98
17,6
156.7
1,21
18.0
1 .96
9.8
213.6
2.19
57.7
3ft
2.11
52.0
118.1
5.39
17.5
3,09
12.9
511.0
9.18
15.1
2.31
8.6
313.2
6.16
26.6
39
3.01
81.9
"72.1
7.01
11.5
3.05
51,3
601.8
13,28
12.7
2.15
6.2
273.0
9.79
30. /
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUFL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL (-CONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARRON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2BJ
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAH
MAKE
MODL
CID
067
1972
OLDS
DELT
455
068
1972
OPEL
1900
116
069
1972
PLYM
DUST
198
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
4.87
7b. b
759.5
4,61
9.9
2.80
69.6
284.8
2,28
22.0
4,44
75.1
267.0
1 .85
2?.2
2
2.97
27.4
497,4
0,88
16.1
4.14
61.6
350.0
1.87
19.3
1.35
82.4
382.7
3.40
16.9
3
5,8b
30.5
1048.2
2,62
8.0
5,66
103.8
481.9
1.58
13.4
7.23
102.2
513.0
3.13
12.7
4
3.02
27.7
846,7
5,28
9.9
2.34
40.7
313.3
2,62
23.1
3.12
64.5
302,5
3.11
21.1
5
2.22
12.7
673.5
7,90
12.7
1.95
25.4
278.2
1.26
27.4
3.07
76.9
277.0
2.90
21.8
6
1.32
9.0
575.9
1.29
14.9
2.04
18.4
240.5
2.76
32.2
2.51
65,8
217.0
2.37
24.8
7
6.43
158.2
712.8
4.24
9.0
2.49
36.7
280.4
3.30
25.7
3,82
105.2
272.6
3.18
19.7
8
1.52
b.4
312.4
3.25
27.1
3.05
56.8
252.4
2.61
25.3
2.59
69.0
291.2
3.56
21.8
9
2.7 b
20.b
646.7
9.98
12.9
2.72
38.1
250.1
2.91
27.9
3.25
81.5
266.5
3.79
21.9
10
3.08
9.6
271.0
2.59
30.0
2.70
44.4
255.8
2.41
26.6
2.66
55.3
293.6
3.92
22.8
u
8.17
180,6
695,4
4.82
8.8
3.55
73.2
280.1
2.77
21.8
3.65
118.2
298.8
2.99
17.9
12
4.83
13.8
297,5
2.17
26.5
3.99
65.0
326.8
3.43
20.1
3.52
83.3
370.7
4.68
17.3
13
9.67
222,6
713.1
3.79
8.1
1.52
80.1
325.0
3.59
19.1
4,34
128.7
333.8
3.20
16.1
14
2.13
13.9
237,9
1.57
33.2
2.66
49.4
250.2
2.49
26.3
2.59
62.2
266.5
3.13
23.8
15
2.35
31.1
312,1
0.49
2«.l
4,12
12.1
238.0
1.20
28.0
3.92
37.5
283.5
3.42
25.0
lb
5.29
64,4
B29.9
1.05
9.4
8,14
96.3
465.3
1.30
13.8
8.49
82.8
543.2
5.67
12.7
17
b. 09
187,3
912.3
5,05
7.2
3.02
55.1
273.8
3.36
24.0
3.80
140.2
281.1
1.48
17.3
18
2.17
13.1
276.8
0.70
26.4
2.91
41.9
281.6
2.68
24.9
3.51
88.1
271.7
2.29
21.1
19
3.84
74.7
836.3
7.40
9.2
2.73
40.6
250,3
3.05
27.5
3.69
113.5
255.6
1.55
19.9
20
2.88
33.3
314.9
0.83
23.6
3.49
45.8
338,0
3,30
21.1
4.39
99,0
321.8
2.87
18.1
21
11,47
343,0
813.1
2.01
6.4
4.41
76.0
360,5
1.33
18.0
4.29
132.6
315.4
3.14
16.5
22
3.67
24,0
254.6
1.04
29.2
1.11
75.5
344,8
3.38
18.6
5,88
94.2
329.1
3.57
17.9
23
5.96
117,5
1071,9
5.59
6.9
5.96
83.4
419,2
1.23
15.6
8,62
126.2
376.4
2.54
11.7
24
3.39
61.0
687,0
7.29
U.2
2.59
38.9
285,7
1.17
25.0
3,60
110.4
271,4
2.79
19.4
25
2.19
18.7
214,1
1.38
35.5
2,11
16.5
237,0
2.12
27.9
2.73
70.5
278,7
3.35
22.3
2b
3.19
47,9
370.9
0.66
19.5
6,06
64.2
342.0
1.95
19.2
5.91
63.7
407,8
4.74
16.9
27
5.51
125.8
723.7
5.72
9.5
3,29
63.6
317.7
4.45
20.7
4,28
135.6
292,2
2,44
17.1
28
2.64
25. 0
247.6
1.01
30.1
2.68
46.3
264.1
2.68
21.2
1,00
76.2
302,4
3.37
20.4
29
5.75
142.7
895.2
3.23
7.8
5.19
73,0
358.1
3.70
18.1
5.93
96.8
349.7
2,68
17.0
JO
5.47
182.8
694.4
3.56
8.9
2.98
32.7
281.7
1.17
25.9
3.84
120.8
258.7
2.26
19.3
31
2.9b
24.5
229.6
1.17
32.0
2.«3
54.8
285.0
2.78
23.4
2,94
86.5
300.3
3.54
1«.9
32
3.49
51.7
355.5
0,60
19.9
5,17
65.9
367.3
2.05
18,2
6.19
80.4
425.7
4,83
15.5
SUM
3.68
77.6
481.1
3.21 1
14,4
2.56 '
11.5
277.3
3,18 25.3
3.04
70.7
291. 7
3.96 21.5
B\G
3.81 111.8
509.3
3.58 1
12.7
3.39
64.7
287.0
3.24 22,2
3.76
96.5
295.6
3.43
19.3
33
0.31
9.9
72.5
0.04
99,7
0.40
12.7
32.5
0,03
1 65
0,45
7.7
33.9
0,04
186
34
5.18
135,8
1024.9
0,68
7.1
3,56
117,4
599,7
0.39
11.2
4,70
85.4
422.5
0.26
15.5
J5
2.68
102. a
737.2
0.56
9.8
1.61
36.0
354.8
0.33
21.3
2.70
32.3
326.6
0.85
23.0
3b
2.14
72.2
515.8
0.43
14.0
1.12
21.1
251,3
0.26
30.8
2.08
15.6
248,7
1.76
31.7
37
2.»1
75.2
342.1
0.53
19,0
1.33
18.8
224,0
1.18
34.4
1.57
9.0
248.3
4.93
33.2
38
2.5b
58.S
335.0
1.50
20.4
1.28
11.8
' 220,4
2.91
36.5
1.57
25.3
254.5
5.39
29.7
39
2.27
i
49.4
389.3
4.56
18.7
1.52
21.2
257,1
4.53
30.1
1.71
45,8
285,4
5. b7
21.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN CRAhS PER HILE (PER KINUTE FOR IDLO
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A lit.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
284
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF modal RESULTS on 1N0IVIDUAL VFHICLES
DENVER
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YFAH
MAKF
HUDL
CIP
070
1972
PLYM
SATE
318
071
1972
PONT
LEMA
350
072
1972
PONT
BONN
455
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
Cll
CU2
NflX
MPG
1
2
3
5.3«
7.1"
10,35
74,8
61,8
97, i
192.2
581 .0
864.3
2.03
3,80
3.23
11.2
12,7
8.5
5.95
7,26
10.78
160,0
140,3
220.0
456.0
598.5
853.6
1.12
1.16
1.39
12.2
10.5
7.2
1 1 .40
9.83
14,81
287.8
263.9
364,2
398.9
424.9
624.8
1 .98
1 .64
?.S6
10.0
10.2
7.1
4
5
6
5.10
4.20
1.12
67,5
53.5
SI.5
498.0
452.3
122.3
S.ll
1.72
4,45
H.3
16. 1
18.3
4,60
3.48
3.16
93,8
82,0
52.3
530.3
167.5
395.6
1,53
2,11
2.27
12,8
11,6
18,2
6.92
6.37
5.47
195,7
213.3
170.6
314.7
301 .2
259.9
1 .64
1.34
1.60
1 J.2
13.5
16.3
7
8
9
5.20
5.26
4.78
112.5
90.7
56.2
449, 1
460.0
155.1
3.95
4,28
5,65
13.8
11.3
15.9
4.43
1.69
1.11
161,6
118.2
125.5
410,7
389.4
392.9
1,67
2.41
2.33
13.1
15.0
l«.7
7,31
5,96
6.90
256.2
199.2
215.0
275.2
284.9
283,0
1.79
3.06
2.60
12.7
14.4
13.8
1 0
1 1
12
5.49
5.91
7.48
52.3
131.8
1 04.3
522.6
163.7
593.8
5,62
3.09
5.30
H.3
12.8
11.4
5.13
6.07
6.95
94.8
230.3
152.6
407.6
439.4
512.8
2.66
1.21
3.33
15.5
10,8
11.5
6,14
6.68
8.49
153,7
332.4
262.4
303. 1
300.9
370.7
1. 84
1. 36
3.HS
15.7
10.4
11.0
13
14
15
6.81
5.78
7 .99
125.8
88,7
46,9
541.7
450.5
479.7
4.34
3.95
3.35
11.7
14.6
15.3
7.44
5.17
7.72
275.0
127.1
102,7
469. b
370. 1
377.9
1.24
2.13
1.27
9.6
15.1
15.7
10.61
6.98
7.97
390,0
204.2
141.3
342,6
274.6
300.8
1 .69
2.64
2.09
9.0
14.4
16.2
16
17
18
16.12
5.94
5.93
72.5
81 ,5
84,2
998.3
412,6
519.4
4.39
2*61
1,42
7.6
15,9
13.2
16,28
5.96
5.62
230.9
173.4
157,4
878.2
389.8
153,4
1.51
1.20
1.72
6.9
13.0
12.9
1 7.20
7,99
7,62
317.0
266.8
274,3
670.6
295.2
311.7
3.52
I.83
1.15
7.3
12.0
11.6
19
20
21
5.45
7.4
-------
APPEND I X 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
VEH
YEAR
makf
MODL
CIO
VEH
year
MAKE
MOOL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKfc
MODL
CID
073
1972
TOYO
CORO
97
074
1972
VOLK
SEDA
97
075
1972
VOLK
SEOA
97
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
J
4.29
4,65
6.99
48,9
68.7
78,7
245.0
339.7
463.8
1.53
1.61
1.39
26.5
19.2
14.6
6.74
6.06
10,70
68.3
64.9
134.2
288.0
334.1
559.7
2.50
2.20
2.20
21.3
19.5
11,0
6,50
7,09
12,82
«1.2
90.0
128.1
262,9
331,9
440,6
2,89
3.18
3.25
25.5
17.9
12.9
4
5
6
3.39
2.74
2.07
36,0
32.3
35.7
267,4
260.4
233.1
1 .71
2.71
2.27
26,5
27.8
29.9
4,87
3.29
2.81
68.3
38.8
27.9
251.4
231.9
224,6
1.59
3.27
2.38
23.7
29.3
32,0
5.34
3.59
2.99
77.5
48.0
40.5
275,9
237.3
221.3
2.92
3.84
3.03
21.a
27.4
30.1
7
8
9
3.21
2.73
2.72
60.4
58.1
39.4
277.9
260,5
252.5
2.85
2.75
3.82
23.2
24,6
27.5
2.75
2.32
2.18
33.6
39.2
33.3
207.1
254,3
219,6
3.81
3.09
".15
33.0
27,5
31,8
2.73
3.38
3.39
39.5
43.0
41.4
179.7
255.7
220.9
3.23
4.64
4.99
35.4
26.6
29.9
10
11
12
3.06
3.62
3.95
48,4
82.6
73.4
272.1
288.7
340.6
3.37
2,35
3.78
24.8
20.6
18.9
1.99
2.64
2.b3
34.3
38.5
05.4
263,0
229,4
329.7
3.30
1.17
4.16
27.5
29.8
21.7
3.05
4.79
1.21
53.4
58,2
62,0
249.3
261.7
314,7
3.70
4,98
4.80
25.9
24.1
20,9
13
14
15
4.14
2.93
3.68
91.1
61.7
57.9
328.5
240.7
256.5
2.56
2.14
1.12
18,3
25.6
21.7
4,05
2.29
3,41
01."
36.9
50.0
323.8
249.3
268.4
6.07
3.13
1.73
20.5
28.2
24.8
5.97
3.53
5.10
80,5
«7.7
62.3
315.3
238.4
242.9
5.98
3.64
2.11
19.3
27.4
24.9
16
17
18
8.03
3.33
3.45
93.7
54.2
59.4
527.1
264.2
278.6
1.29
2.09
1.98
12.7
24.7
23.2
8.68
4.95
2.84
124.4
60.7
42.4
538.0
285,5
324.1
1.80
1.31
4.12
11.7
22."
22.2
12.97
7.41
5.28
131.9
62.8
85. 7
503.4
230.9
292.8
3. 02
3.91
3.19
11.8
25. 1
?0.0
19
20
21
J. 12
4.20
3.18
46.3
86,9
79.9
245.8
330.4
266.5
1.70
1 .83
1 .99
27.0
18.5
22.1
3.96
3.14
4.70
45.9
5a.5
66,0
239,9
372.5
291.8
2.85
4.24
4.04
27.3
19.0
21.6
5.71
5.68
6.08
58.5
61.9
63,0
217.4
295.3
258.6
3.52
3.95
0.55
27. 1
21.5
21.5
22
23
24
4,39
5.10
2.88
100.2
79.9
61.7
291,8
372.4
261,7
1 .68
2.18
2.34
19. 1
17.3
24,1
J.19
7.04
3.61
52.7
97.7
56.3
312.4
372.4
298,8
3.56
3.07
5.09
21.9
16.2
22.3
7.20
13.42
5.21
70,6
127.4
78,9
273 .6
404 ,6
280.8
3.80
4,28
a.51
21.8
11.7
21.1
25
26
27
3.04
5.47
3.24
62,5
78.3
77.2
244.9
371 ,6
295,8
2.16
1.67
2.29
25.2
17.3
20.8
2.35
4.98
3.83
34.1
65. 3
61.8
257.5
389.0
292.4
3.60
2.87
4.79
27.9
17.5
22.1
5.65
8.15
5.27
58, 1
82, 0
77,«
229.4
311.5
306.8
2.88
2.74
4.56
26.7
19.0
19.9
28
29
30
3.82
4.49
3.81
68,6
59.6
95,0
271.4
337.8
265,1
2.10
2.03
1.92
22.7
19,9
20.8
2.31
5.74
3.60
39.8
83.5
57.5
273.1
356. 1
297.1
3,46
3.02
4.97
25.9
17.6
22.3
3.85
7.67
4.27
59. 1
92.3
79.0
247 .2
359.3
296.5
2.88
3.65
4.66
25.2
16.8
20.4
31
32
3.19
5.51
70.5
88,5
265,7
387,7
2.48
1,94
23.0
16,3
2.57
a.73
42.0
64.6
279.8
399.0
3.81
3.26
25.1
17.2
3.36
7.34
60. i
86,9
250.0
317.8
3.05
2.97
25.0
18.6
SUM 1,02 S3.« 243.9 2.86 26.3
BAG 3.27 76,9 27S.9 2.31 21,8
2.66 36.6 267.5 3.8
-------
APPFNDIX 0
LISTING flF modal results on individual VEHICLES
HousrnN
VEH
Yt AR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
mmm
- - - -
mm m +
m-mm
- _ -
- - - «
- - ~ -
m mm m
. - -
m m m m
— ...
• ••
001
197(1
BUIC
LESA
155
002
1971
CHEV
NOVA
350
003
1971
C HE V
"AH
350
node
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
1
1.92
26.8
769,7
3.97
10,7
6,34
124,1
735.7
2.19
9.3
4.92
36,8
801.8
2.03
10,1
2
3.87
11.1
931 . 1
1 .63
9.0
5,52
109.2
701,7
>.13
10.0
5.40
47.7
1043.8
1.75
7.8
1
9.63
1«.7
1380.1
2.32
6.2
7.96
118,0
992,1
1 .27
7.4
9.98
13.3
1282,8
1 .57
6.4
u
3.57
6.5
711 .1
2.39
11.6
3.36
65.7
615.2
1.45
12.2
3.95
28.8
756.8
1.15
10.9
5
2.47
8.5
611 .9
J,J"
13.1
2.51
12.9
550.5
3.43
14.2
2.47
24.8
643. 1
1.73
12.9
6
2.35
8.2
625.1
2.02
13.8
2.26
32.6
489,7
1 .26
16,2
2.10
20,2
654.1
1.45
12,8
7
2.5b
13.6
651.1
3.97
12.2
3. 16
25.8
550.3
2.59
14.8
2.71
87,8
571.1
1.43
12.1
8
2.2"
32,6
667,8
2.86
12.2
2,84
111.9
518.4
1.60
12.5
2.16
69.1
671 .5
2.03
11.3
9
2.81
32.5
623.9
1.21
1 3 «0
2.75
31.1
525.0
4.1 1
15.1
2.68
71.2
565.8
1 .54
12.9
10
2.70
17.7
702.9
2,80
12.0
2.38
35,8
570.0
1.65
14.0
2,62
54.7
691 .8
1 .83
11.3
1 1
2.87
19.6
732.<1
5.15
10.6
3.86
71.6
554.2
2.98
13.1
3.29
132. H
655.0
1 .20
10.2
12
3.58
28.6
881 ,8
3,81
9.5
3,10
98,9
683,5
1.91
10,4
3.10
83.B
857.6
2.33
8.9
13
3.33
60.4
821.6
5.19
9.6
<1,67
88.5
603.5
2.88
11.7
3.37
119.9
701 .9
2.05
9.8
14
2.32
18.8
658.1
3.08
12.8
2.51
72.2
521.2
1.12
13.7
2.02
63.4
648. 1
1 .66
11.8
15
<1. Oil
12.7
730.9
1.71
11.6
4.50
72.0
566.9
0.72
12.8
3.82
32.3
723.2
0.9 I
11.3
1 h
9.31
21.7
1603.5
3.22
5.3
10.27
221.7
1237.4
0,91
5.5
7.56
48.0
1183.3
1 .33
5.6
17
2.88
27.1
763.2
1.08
10.9
3.62
56.5
560.1
2.75
13.1
2.61
70.5
667.5
1.81
11.3
16
2,15
16.9
713.7
2,59
U,9
4.06
93.2
582.7
1.20
12.0
2.07
«2.i
717.3
1.47
11.2
19
2.63
26.1
708.4
3,09
11.7
2,62
67.4
539.9
1.81
13.6
2.08
45.6
652.8
1 .39
12.1
20
3.22
27.1
832.9
2.71
10,0
5,86
132,0
682,8
1.18
9.8
2,58
40.5
842.7
1 .67
9.7
21
3.11
111.5
581.9
3.15
11.5
1.16
99.2
612.0
1.99
11.4
3.99
209,-6
635.8
1.25
9.1
?2
3.06
39.9
791.3
3.83
10.3
5.39
146,9
600, 7
1.38
>0,5
3,2i
86,4
752.5
1.73
9,9
23
5.09
27.1
990.7
1.11
8.5
7.19
116.5
761,5
2.00
9.1
4.73
49.1
861 .0
1.93
9 . ^
2«
2.19
25,0
670.5
3.98
12. u
3.33
69.1
540.3
3.30
13.5
2.48
1 lfl.4
591 .8
1 .21
U.3
25
2.07
16.7
639.0
3.16
13.2
2.59
85,1
520.0
1.43
13.4
2.02
81.6
617.1
1 .15
11.8
26
5.89
21,8
1003.6
2,18
8.1
7.16
129.6
787.1
1.04
8.7
4.83
59.6
981 .9
1 . 09
H.l
27
2.56
56.2
766.1
1.56
10,3
1.80
137,8
589.9
2.50
10.8
2.75
131,6
619.9
1.71
1".3
28
2.91
15,6
713.7
3.22
11.9
3.95
76.5
586,6
1.32
12.3
2.58
14.9
684.2
1 .65
1 1 .6
29
1.65
13.6
928.5
3.35
9.2
6.52
97.5
708.0
1.59
10. 1
3.90
42.2
853.0
1 .59
9.5
JO
2.32
19.8
656.5
3.50
12.0
3.16
72.7
533.0
1.96
13.5
2.81
168.8
605.6
0.9U
10.1
31
2.03
23.6
701.6
3.52
>1,9
3.91
157,5
527.9
1.21
11.3
2.23
103.9
648.4
1 .53
10.8
32
5.21
19.6
ion.a
2.67
8,«
7.65
>30.2
758.2
0.89
9.0
5,03
69.7
932.5
1.10
8.4
SUM
2.23
22.9
700.5
3.38 1
l>.9
3.43
69.3
580.1
1 .88 I
12.7
2.04
60. 1
664.2
1.50 11.6
HAG
2.58
33.9
769.3
3.59 1
10.7
3.79 107.3
612.1
2.19 1
11.2
2.33
99.5
701.5
1.55 10.3
33
o.ia
0.9
113.9
0,07
60,5
0,85
33.3
101,7
0,03
56,6
0,95
2.6
106. 1
0,07
78,1
3"
u.ia
8.9
1705.1
1 .01
5.)
7.01
313.1
1303.7
0.44
4.9
4.08
42,0
1510.1
1.11
5.6
35
2.37
6.2
1132,7
1,01
7.7
3,1 0
111,7
679,8
0.22
9.7
2.07
22.2
890.9
0,51
9.5
36
1.41
1. 1
773.7
0,69
11.3
1,33
82,7
664,9
0.24
11.1
1.81
47.8
1064.9
0.58
7.7
37
1.51
1.1
576.9
0.55
15.1
1.15
19,6
510.9
0.30
15,0
0.50
16.6
494 .9
0,31
17.0
38
0,91
1.2
567,5
1,11
15,1
8,65
>4.7
493.3
1.18
16.3
0.33
>2,3
524.9
0.93
16,3
39
0.87
8,1
607,7
5.05
>1.2
0,99
25,6
551,3
2.58
14,9
0,29
>9,2
603. 1
2,15
11,0
EMISSION RESULTS IN grams per MILt (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUFL ECONUMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDRMGfc N RATIO
287
-------
APPEND]X 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
004 197*1 DODG CHAR 318
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
005 197a FORD TORI 302
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
006 1971 FURD CUST 351
MODE
NO,
HC
CI)
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CU
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
1
6.ai
5.32
8.75
88.9
60,3
125.9
828.8
731.3
1110.1
5.31
2.79
2.87
9.0
10,5
6.6
0.59
0.14
7.08
22.1
16.3
15.2
879,0
742,8
1076.7
3.80
2.18
1.61
9.6
11.a
7.9
7.21
10.97
11.68
111.1
49.5
166.7
817.6
702.5
1032,7
12.05
5.30
4.73
8.7
10.0
6,7
4
5
6
3.58
2.52
2.20
04.B
15.9
8.4
744.9
655.8
494,4
3.71
5.33
3.01
10.7
12."
17.2
1,46
2.15
1.79
7.1
4.1
3.9
661,7
592.0
562,9
2.34
3.30
1.72
13.0
14.7
15.4
4.27
2.87
3.56
58,9
14.8
9.9
602.7
544.6
511.6
6.70
10.29
7.33
12.5
15.4
16.5
7
8
9
2.89
2.37
2.50
25.5
30,9
16.7
632.0
588.8
646.5
7.58
«.72
8.84
13.0
13,6
13,0
2,91
2.09
2.54
61.9
27.5
17.8
589.2
567,5
590.2
3.76
3.09
5,40
12.8
ia,a
14.2
2.59
3,94
3.45
33.3
32,0
19.5
550,7
614,4
541.6
13.11
8.25
13.32
14.5
13.1
15.2
10
1 1
12
2.69
3.11
3.37
13,0
«6,3
22.3
595.0
711,5
755,9
5.56
11.as
7.3a
ia.2
11.2
11,1
2.26
3,40
2.8a
9.9
84.8
22.9
596,2
620,5
741.8
3.11
4,42
4.15
14.3
11.6
11.3
3.96
3.08
5.25
18.3
51.5
26.6
586.6
591.7
793.9
6.33
15.41
11.55
14.1
13.0
10.4
13
14
15
3,83
2.58
4.28
50.7
16,9
a5.1
771.0
538.4
540.9
12,2a
5.58
2.99
10,3
15.5
ia,2
3,66
2.04
3.06
60,9
17.3
12.9
711,6
548,2
598,8
5.71
2,97
1.61
10.8
15.3
14.1
3.75
13.12
6.64
52.1
21.6
58.3
680.4
577.4
602.9
18.67
8.73
u.26
11.5
13.6
12.«
16
17
18
10.17
3.66
3.11
180.9
75.7
30.0
1046.2
578.7
627.8
3.60
7.ai
3.49
6.5
12.5
13.0
6.92
2.61
2.09
17.7
20.5
7.5
1170.7
567.1
717,6
1.73
4.80
2.72
7.3
14.6
12.1
13.91
3.09
4.55
263,0
78,9
115, 1
1053.5
586.0
613.5
4.30
13.17
7,58
5.9
12.3
11.0
19
20
21
3.33
3.80
3.65
55.8
33.5
79.6
545,0
741 .6
610.2
7.18
3.97
8.17
13.8
u.o
11.9
2.53
2.65
3.25
19.9
11.7
111.1
504.8
842,0
618.5
a.06
3.03
0.16
16.3
10.2
11.0
3.51
5,66
2,90
65.0
35.7
80,2
530.8
705,7
621.9
12.58
8.31
10,50
13.6
10.8
11.7
22
23
2a
3.81
6.25
2.72
48,0
101.0
33,2
694.4
810.5
610,4
5.26
6,59
8.51
11.4
9.0
13.2
3,21
0,64
2.19
41.3
26.6
16,8
711.3
840,3
589,8
3.07
3.08
5,22
11.3
9.9
14.2
5,00
7.31
2.71
4?,2
120,4
25,6
735,0
590.0
535.4
9.39
10.09
13.33
10.8
10.9
IS.2
25
26
27
2.53
6.10
3.28
20,9
63.5
53,0
562.7
755.8
683,8
a.88
3.62
10.19
1«.7
10.1
ll.«
i,ae
0.32
2.59
9.2
13.1
38.1
583,2
677.5
669.1
3.58
2.79
5.69
14.7
9.7
12.0
3.04
1 0.29
3.17
16.3
96.8
41.5
586.0
827.3
637.9
9.25
6.56
17,69
14.3
6.0
12.a
28
29
30
J.52
5.85
2.91
27.2
117.1
ai.5
567.8
770,5
630.8
4,38
4.95
9.55
11.3
9. 1
12.6
2.a5
3.87
2.33
9.6
9.3
32.7
629,6
836,6
605.8
2.97
3.63
4.71
1 i • 6
10.3
13.4
4.39
6.85
2.61
29.1
120.9
24.7
5i6.8
760.7
601.1
8.90
8.96
10.80
10.9
9.1
13.7
31
32
3.05
6.75
36.6
70,6
590.9
771,0
«.73
3.97
13.5
9.8
2.05
4,aa
21.1
21.5
605.2
853.2
3.25
2.66
13.8
9.8
3.56
10,19
17.5
74.6
596.7
762.0
9.71
7.47
14,0
9.7
SUM
HAG
2.90
3.03
33,2
04.9
610.6
705.0
6.97 13.2
6.65 11.3
2.10
2.7«
20.2
29.1
619.7 3.15 13,5
660.6 4.14 12, a
3.07
1.60
39.3
ai ,o
552.2
6<18. J
9.00 14.2
9.31 12,2
33
0.87
18,9
142.9
0.69
50,6
0.39
0.2
98,1
0.00
89. 1
1 .99
26.5
180.1
1.65
30.9
34
7,60
266,5
993,1
0,65
6,2
5,86
4.1
1149,3
0,62
7,6
1 1,32
293,6
1185.5
2,08
5,3
35
3.92
140,3
775.6
1.03
8.8
1 .38
4.6
921.7
0.31
9.5
6.07
161.7
602.6
0.63
9.3
36
2.13
70,0
603.0
0,63
12,3
1 ,07
3.5
646,3
0,69
13,5
4.01
100.5
471,4
0,29
13.8
37
1.82
19.5
410.9
4.73
19.8
0.73
2.7
534,2
1 .00
16.4
1.92
30,6
356.4
1.11
21 .6
38
1.64
6,1
467,4
3,91
18,4
1.11
7.5
567,4
1.50
15.2
2.30
9.5
028.6
7.10
19.7
39
2.00
8.5
553.6
9,a9
15.5
1.15
4.2
536,9
4.43
16.2
1 .90
14.8
381.7
7.82
21.6
emission results in crams per mile (per minute for idle)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON Tfl HYDROGEN RATIU
208
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR MAKE HODL CID
007 1970 OLDS OELT 350
VEH YEAR MAKE HODL CID
008 1 <> 7 u PLYH DUST 318
VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CIO
009 1974 PUNT CATA <100
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
coa
NOX
MPG
I 0
II
12
13
in
15
16
17
18
1"
20
21
22
21
2a
25
26
27
28
29
5,65
5.20
9.88
31,1 875.2
19,6 864,2
20.0 1 <158 ,9
J.73 9.5
2.89 33.8
2.95 8.1
~.59 199,2
2.03 44.2
4.14 178.7
3.48 33.2
5.61 298.9
4.42 63.2
~.30 296.5
3.03 52,5
4.48 28.2
911 .5
783.0
614.0
731.2
691 .3
680.7
648.7
717.0
817.4
764.2
575.3
648.8
9.58 28,3 1446.0
4.12 138.8 758.3
3.22 42.8 715.2
3.97 111,6 671,2
5,51 56.2 835.2
4,87 217,B 721.6
3.93 69.4 796.0
5.84 31,2 1076.4
4.06 189,9 646.8
3.31 53.7 572,1
7.2? 42.0 879,2
4.55 164.9 751.8
3.77
6.06
38,1
21,0
659,4
976,3
6.67 9,4
2.«7 9.7
2.73 5.8
2.54 9,5
4.15 10.5
2.00 14,0
4.45 8,4
2.94 11.6
2.47 9.1
2.39 12.5
2.49 7.4
2.86 9.5
2.62 7.1
2.28 13.3
2.93 12.5
4.49 5.8
3,07 9.0
1.81 11.2
2.53 10,3
2.25 9,«
3.47 8.2
2.98 9.7
5.93 7.8
3.10 9.3
2.48 13.3
3.54 9.2
3.63 8.7
2.55 12,1
6.0U 8.6
4,00 135,7
4.28 67.6
8.28 206.1
3,86 67.2
3,32 18.1
3.84 7.1
3.43 22,9
3,04 14,7
J.21 14.8
3.70 14.8
3.80 47.B
4.55 15.0
4.77 44,3
2.48 10.1
4.15 49.9
14.91 240.8
4.94 75,4
3.86 22.)
5.18 54.0
5.60 20.6
4.27 51.5
3.42 17.4
6.26 117,2
3.42 17,2
3.03 10. 6
8.00 85.8
4.29 37.6
629.7 5.19 10.4
63U.5 2.88 11.8
937.2 3.00 6.9
640.3 4,02 11.7
572.2 6.20 14.5
443.0 3.29 19.0
598.7 11,08 13,7
488.4 4.92 17.0
544.6 8.91 15.4
489.2 4.75 16.9
620.8 11.69 12,5
624.1 7.49 13,4
690.7 13.45 11.a
467.3 5.69 18.1
443.8 2.R3 16,6
878.4 2.81 6.8
561.2 8.47 12.8
539.4 4.59 15.1
538.0 6.96 13.9
570.5 5.65 14,3
651.9 13.09 11,9
605.3 6.25 13.8
767.8 6.72 9.1
559,2 11.06 14,9
474.9 5.78 17.7
657.1 4.43 10.9
616.6 12.46 12.9
9,42 173,2 706.5
8.26 190,5 695.0
13.29 389.9 1044.2
5,13 137,6 604.5
3.59 68.5 529.0
3.21 52,2 507.6
4,00 86.3 573,3
3.5« 76.1 586.3
4.04 58.7 550.1
4.45 51.8 579.2
4.84 111.6 638.0
5.54 73.0 796.6
5.34 108,5 724.8
4.06 55.5 588.2
8.44 117,6 548.5
21.51 406.4 1143.5
6,21 149.7 607.9
4.62 80.9 606.7
5,34 120.7 623.8
5,93 99.0 722.7
5.82 234.J 624.3
6.11 103.4 679.6
10.21 205.7 769.2
3.79 75.4 569.9
3.73 59.4 596.8
11.62 172,6 773,7
4.75 100,1 582,3
3,69
6.38
17.2
92.0
498.8
689.4
5.78 16.5
6.82 10.4
5.12 73.2
8.41 203.2
643,6
688.4
1.51 8,8
1.30 8.7
1.36 5.2
1.88 10.6
3,70 1 J.7
1 .79 14,8
5.92 12.3
3.25 12.4
5.52 13.5
3.24 13.2
6,30 10,7
4.70 9,6
7,03 9.7
3.63 12.9
1.96 11.7
2.51 4.8
3.94 10,3
2.40 11.9
3.41 10.7
2.92 9.9
3.40 8.8
3.90 10.*
3.09 7.9
4.94 12.7
4.02 12.6
2.77 8.2
5.00 11.8
3.26 11.5
2.09 8.6
30
4. 30
181.3
647.2
3.05
9.4
3.41
17,0
569,5
11.13
14,6
3,84
94,6
507.9
4,26
13.3
31
2,85
67,5
672.5
2,60
11.3
2.63
8.5
518,8
5.61
16.4
3.70
64.3
638,2
1.74
11.8
32
6.37
51.1
916.5
4.10
8.7
3.51
58,8
656,8
4.20
11.7
10.21
140.0
850,7
3.08
8.0
SUM
3.00
71,«
699.3
2.91
10,8
4.53
28.8
531,8
6,74
15,0
4,07
83.6
556.3
2.96
12.7
HAG
3.38
117,9
798.6
3.19
8.9
3.80
33.6
603.6
7.63
13.3
4,97
105.5
643.9
3.72
10.8
33
0. 76
0.9
128.8
0.06
66.9
1.52
16.0
130,7
0.00
55.3
1.28
55.3
82.0
0.06
51.3
34
13.17
1 1.6
1581.4
0.87
5.4
7.87
288.2
1271.7
0.63
5.1
15.13
580.7
1214.6
1.10
4.1
35
2,87
11.5
1134.1
0,95
7.6
4.82
209.2
625.4
0.42
9.2
7,94
275.5
573.0
0,20
8.6
36
1.30
6.1
768,6
0,60
11.3
2.90
1 30.4
447 .2
0.63
13.4
3.96
140.5
497.8
0.25
12.1
37
1.08
4.1
499.5
1.81
17.4
3.69
23,9
368.2
2.12
21.3
2.33
48,4
378.2
1.06
19.2
38
0.92
3.3
576.0
1.57
15.2
7.69
5.0
391,7
3,89
20,9
1.95
31,6
449,9
1,66
17.5
39
0.73
3.8
671 .4
3.95
13.1
4,49
4.3
462,4
6.98
18.4
1 .80
22.4
435,6
1.47
18.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL tCONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GA|_LON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TU HYDROGEN RATIO
2d9
-------
APPEND I X 0,CONT'D
LISTING Of MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
010
1971
VOLK
SFOA
97
Oil
1973
AMMO
GREM
258
012
1973
BUIC
STAw
350
MODE
NO,
HC
CI)
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
t
6.63
50,8
403. 1
2.65
17,6
6.65
238.6
504.5
0.97
9.9
1.23
48.1
953.4
6.50
8.5
2
7,87
S2.3
365.5
3,44
17.1
6.52
233.4
452.1
0.67
10.6
4 .79
40. 8
878.0
4.05
9.2
1
10.69
123,6
531.4
2.41
11.7
1 1.92
360.6
755,9
1.58
6.5
8.63
90.8
1224.6
3.10
6.4
a
0.77
56.9
355.5
1.99
19.3
5,28
189. 1
435,3
0,91
11,8
3.12
21.6
632.0
2.38
13.1
5
2.83
32.5
329.6
3.93
22.8
3.96
173.0
361.8
0.95
13.7
2.38
14.7
548.0
3.11
15.3
6
2.17
22.1
273.1
4.63
28.1
3.48
162,4
298,9
0.65
15.7
2.61
10.5
577.4
3.14
14.7
7
2.69
32.8
310.9
4,14
23.9
4,03
177,9
396,0
1,84
12,9
1.76
112,0
550,9
4.28
12.1
e
2.51
58.7
285.6
4.33
23.0
3.61
179.6
343,0
0.91
13,9
3.04
20.2
629,3
5.34
13.2
9
2.«1
34.0
305.4
4,05
24,2
1.10
185.0
368,.4
1.07
13.2
2,02
14.0
556.8
5,49
15.2
10
2.12
<12.7
285.0
4.57
24.7
4,26
183.2
349,9
0.64
13.6
2.19
9.6
670.0
5.47
12.8
i i
2.98
46,1
317.3
3.77
22.2
4.29
180.9
420.5
1.79
12.4
2.10
51.5
657.3
6,74
11.9
12
3.10
54.6
358.7
5,36
19.5
5.14
234.4
453.9
1.08
10.6
2,80
16.9
858.5
7.52
9.9
11
3.92
52.9
359,0
6.29
19.5
4,97
198.6
435,5
1.84
11.6
2,50
57.2
765.7
7,80
10.3
l
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING (IF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
HOUSTON
VEH YtAH HAKE MODL CID
Oil 1973 BUIC ELFC 455
VEH YIAR MAKE MUDL CID
014 1973 CADI DEVI 472
VEH YEAH MAKE MflDL CID
015 1973 CAPW C APR 122
MODE
N(l,
MC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
Cfl
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
1,17
5,15
8.32
53.3
27.1
2«.B
803.6
872.9
1387.1
9.00
".56
1.95
9.9
9.5
6.1
1,74
1.27
7.65
11.7
33,5
62.8
957,8
956,1
1153,6
6,31
2.19
2.88
6.5
8,7
5.6
6.86
5,21
9.25
24.2
33,1
77.3
474.5
428.3
527.0
2.69
2.12
1.62
16,6
17.9
13.1
<1
5
6
3.89
2.78
2.26
11.0
12.2
6,6
829.5
688.8
600.6
1,92
6.80
J.91
10,3
12.1
H.a
3.00
2.12
1.53
23.8
11.1
5.6
719.7
651 , 1
706,»
3.88
4.65
4.14
11.1
13.1
12.3
3.00
1 .85
1 .61
29.5
6.7
10.0
387. 1
369.3
306.4
2.08
3.82
2.00
20.0
21.0
27.1
7
fl
9
1. 35
2.53
2.<19
101.8
51.4
33. 7
685.0
663.5
657.0
5.73
5.32
B.2S
10,3
11.8
12.1
2.17
2,26
2.50
77.1
10,3
26.2
653,0
771,6
669,2
5.95
3.77
5.20
11.4
10.5
12.4
3.28
2.35
2.37
22.0
43.7
18.6
366.3
319.5
349.6
3.43
3.15
4.23
21 .6
22.4
23.0
10
11
12
2.29
3.19
2.92
11,6
IPS.9
JO.7
686,6
78«.2
887.5
6,37
ft, 13
8.62
12.1
9.3
9.1
2,16
2.53
2.81
11.6
13.9
17.6
813.0
793.1
1005,2
3.57
5.84
5.46
10.6
10.2
8.5
1.99
3.48
2.83
19.1
62.1
41.2
327 .7
364.7
115.9
2.60
3.41
3.51
24,4
18.7
18.1
I 3
II
15
5.56
2,08
2.86
90,0
20. 1
12.4
88(1.9
613.6
700.9
10.11
6.11
3.82
8.6
13.0
12.2
2.85
1.83
3.39
18,7
13.5
12,3
929,7
813,9
799,3
7.25
3.71
2.13
8.7
10.6
10.7
4,78
2.35
6,01
03.5
11.6
16.8
375.3
307.0
328.?
3.81
2.35
1.42
17.0
21.1
21 . 1
16
17
18
6.54
3.24
2.58
17.3
51.7
22,0
1589.1
757.6
766.6
7 .09
7.78
5.35
5.«
ln.i
11.0
6.10
2.32
2,05
27.5
33.3
14.6
1795.0
775.5
813.6
2.62
5.01
3.09
4.8
10,6
10.5
13.91
4.60
2.96
117.3
1«.7
15.5
655.6
333.2
389.3
1.75
5.16
3.06
10.0
21.6
21.0
19
20
21
2.70
1.12
1.19
«1.5
31.0
187.5
662.0
892.9
783.6
5.76
5.39
5,01
12.0
9.3
fl.l
1.96
2.63
2.74
21.9
20,0
132.8
651,6
1367,9
782,6
4,65
3,68
5.05
12.7
6.3
8.9
3,H
2,78
3.88
10.8
17.1
85.5
312.7
431.4
141.3
3.11
3.16
3. 1 I
23.9
18,9
18.2
22
23
2"
2.9H
".72
2.62
51. 1
52.8
13,8
722.7
1087,8
692,7
5.10
8,30
7.96
10.9
7.5
11.5
3.17
1.16
2,02
11. 9
13. 1
22.7
912.2
1 104,3
689,7
4. 32
5.51
5.53
8.7
7,5
12.1
2.80
7.21
1 .82
63.5
78.9
20.1
369. 1
417,8
354.5
2.61
3.61
4.28
18.6
11.9
22.6
25
26
27
2.05
3.81
3.10
20.0
17. 4
76.6
620.2
953,2
831.8
6.33
5.21
9.16
11.5
8.9
9.?
1.90
1.60
2.11
17.3
2". 1
55.2
692.2
1053,8
833.7
4.55
3,64
6.07
12.2
e.o
9.6
1.42
6.87
2.43
16.9
17.9
12,4
331 .8
480,0
399,9
3.1 I
1 .99
7,22
21.5
15.8
19,4
28
29
30
2.3"
0.22
2.81
20.1
32.7
70.H
689.5
1017.1
720.0
5.72
8.58
7.69
12.2
B.2
10,6
2.17
3.77
2.04
16,8
51.7
53.8
851,9
973.9
684,1
4,02
5.16
5.11
10,0
8.3
11.4
2,02
5.52
2.29
14.9
68.B
12.2
33 7 .3
422.9
351 .8
2.87
3.14
2.70
21.2
16.2
21.7
31
32
2.31
3.95
05.6
32.0
680, 1
965.0
5.15
5.21
11.7
8,6
2,00
4,54
28.2
3«.l
803,7
1114,7
4.28
5,78
10.4
7.3
?. 18
6.02
55.0
54,5
329.2
524,9
2.13
0,99
21.0
l«.l
SUM
BAG
2.38
2.95
35.0
56.8
718.1
814.3
6.38 11.4
7.19 9.7
1.92
2.3a
25.2
36.0
750.9
829.5
3.49 1).l
4.38 9.9
2.01
2.72
27.1
«3.7
346.7
366.2
2.6b 22.3
3.25 20.0
33
n .69
8.1
165.0
0,03
19. 3
0.92
10.5
227,0
0,46
36.0
0,69
14.7
34,9
0.02
147
34
4.12
22.6
1928,1
0,39
4.5
3.42
24.4
2109,4
0,84
4,1
6,38
206.9
552.2
0,96
9.9
35
1 .76
9,8
1193,8
0,22
7.3
2.96
25.0
1171,9
1.04
7.3
2.54
63.7
350,6
0.15
19.3
3b
1 .08
1.2
795.9
0.97
1 I .0
1 .02
7.0
796,6
0.38
10.9
1 .28
26.6
314,5
0. 34
22.7
37
1 .33
1.1
529.9
2.79
16.1
0.97
5.1
496, 3
1 .06
17.5
0,21
5.8
381 .9
1.21
22.7
38
1.21
«.3
57B.9
2.75
15.1
0.56
3.6
508,9
1 .79
17.2
0.22
1.9
254.6
0,81
34.0
39
1 .30
7.2
627.7
8.82
13.8
0,55
4.1
584.3
1 .54
15.0
0.20
2.2
300.9
2.20
29.1
FMISSIOn HESUL1S IN GRAMS PER HILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PFR GAL ION (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FltFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 C»RBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2V1
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEM
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
HAKE
MUDL
CID
Vf H
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
016
1973
CHEV
VEGA
100
017
1973
CHEV
VEGA
140
018
1973
CHEV
CHEL
307
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
1
«.33
62.9
002. 1
1.98
15.1
3.91
36.0
518.1
0.85
15.1
9.33
50.0
711,6
3.66
10.8
2
7.16
65,1
508,1
2.20
13.0
0.53
"2.2
013.8
0,26
17,9
9,89
28,2
932,0
4,65
8.8
3
10.09
101.5
561 .0
1.03
11.5
7.80
58.7
610,9
2.73
12.1
16,78
51.0
831.7
0.00
9.2
4
3.77
56.0
360.1
2.80
19.3
3.00
21.0
011,8
5.13
19.5
6.77
21.6
723.1
3.36
11.4
5
2.28
22.1
390.5
3.89
20.5
2.20
22.9
378.0
5.70
21.1
3.51
13.0
609.3
4 .47
13,0
6
2.2«
31 .0
368 .6
2.50
20.9
2.00
18.0
303,5
3.79
26.2
4.14
17.9
500.5
3.34
15.3
7
2,17
26.5
000.9
0.89
19.7
2.05
39,8
018.3
7.51
18.2
4,99
66.0
026.4
4.13
16.2
e
2.64
#7.9
362.6
3.17
19.9
1.90
29.0
362.3
5.00
21.0
3.58
09.8
522.3
4.16
14.5
9
2.76
2"».3
350,2
0.23
21.7
1 .90
30,5
379,2
7.02
20.2
3.90
27.0
003.2
6.57
17.8
10
2.76
«2.5
328.7
2.83
22.0
1.92
23.2
370,0
5.15
21.5
3,73
15.0
543.0
4.83
15.3
11
2.79
56.3
385.6
3.87
18.4
1.98
52.3
023.8
6,07
17.3
6.03
77.0
511.7
5.19
13.6
12
3,30
69.0
011.1
3.10
16.7
2,20
33.3
002.5
5.90
17.7
4.80
36.0
683.1
5,68
11.8
13
3.93
68.5
050 .2
0.01
15.S
2.18
09.7
490,3
6,71
15.0
7.49
86.6
618.7
6.85
11.4
1 4
2,58
55.9
307.7
2.2«
22.0
1.63
27,7
322.7
«.ll
23.9
3.74
22.7
533.5
4.70
15.3
15
6.90
81.7
296.0
1.23
19.9
2.01
33,6
310.0
2.80
24.0
7.86
18.0
053.3
2.54
17.5
16
16.80
222.0
565,9
1.52
9.2
6.09
8S.7
628.0
3.17
11.3
25.15
50.0
1025.6
3.32
7.5
17
4.03
62.3
399.0
2,86
16.0
2.09
32,5
399,8
5.12
19,a
6,79
.32."
097,0
5,31
15.6
16
«.12
70,9
329.7
1.50
19.3
2.53'
08,9
307.0
3.12
20.5
4,20
18.5
926.2
3.76
9.2
19
5.20
73.2
337 .9
2,56
16,9
2.13
39.9
386.5
0.51
19.5
6.14
12.7
520.6
4,87
15.8
20
5.15
89,3
371 .0
1.57
16.8
2.98
"1,3
392,0
0.71
19.0
5.57
20.5
1086.0
4.39
7.8
21
a.oo
91.5
390 .9
2.77
16.2
2.16
55.0
055„ 3
6.62
16.2
7.63
66.2
560,7
5,27
12,3
22
0.50
100.3
300 .1
2.06
17.2
2.09
39.7
011.5
5.05
18.5
5.46
56.7
635.3
0, 36
11.9
23
7.89
133.2
016.0
2.72
13.6
2.99
36,7
518,7
6.00
15.2
9.60
53.2
726.8
5.09
10.6
2a
3,05
52.0
375.1
3.11
19.0
1 .67
36.2
385,6
6.23
19.8
4.20
31.7
562.4
6. 16
13.7
25
2.53
60,0
293.2
1 ,90
22.1
1.47
21.4
315,5
0,09
23.7
3,44
19.7
518.6
0.29
15,8
26
10.16
1 32.1
398.8
1.45
13.9
3.29
52.7
000,R
3,67
16.5
10.37
21.5
633.6
4.10
12,7
27
a,76
79,2
027 .1
3.09
15.7
1 .73
30.2
037,6
6,59
17.9
6. 16
06.5
313.2
6,45
21.7
28
3.39
72.1
285.0
1.85
21.7
1.81
22.1
356,6
4.32
22.3
0,74
20. 1
331.0
4.15
23.5
29
10.40
130,2
360.9
2.19
10.2
2.81
26.9
081.1
7,00
16,6
9.08
33.2
615.7
".37
12.7
30
3,81
62,6
377 .3
3.61
18.2
1 .60
30.0
399.9
7.67
19.3
5,38
43.2
579.6
5.20
13.4
31
2.90
79,5
311,8
1 .65
19,9
1.55
29.1
306.0
0.11
22.0
0.00
38.6
592.8
0.26
13,3
32
10,01
135,2
382.3
1.2"
10.2
3.25
53.7
000.3
3.89
16.5
11.70
52,3
679,3
0,03
11.1
SUM
J.09
52.5
336,6
2.63 20.7
1.73
25.9
379.6
5,70 ,
20.8
3.93
30.3
594.1
«,4h
13.6
BAG
3.36
68,4
361. 1
2.73 :
18.5
1.73
39,0
426.7
5.71
16,0
5,09
43.6
630,5
5,11
12.0
33
1.66
27,0
101.1
0,60
59,0
0.02
7.0
66.6
0.02
1 1 1
1 .08
5.7
61.3
0.07
120
34
6.19
272.0
550.0
O.as
8.9
1.52
82.8
957,1
o.sa
8.1
12.76
16.4
1142.1
1,24
7.3
35
5.25
138.2
391 .6
1.29
10.2
1.92
37.9
009,2
0.00
18.7
o.ll
10.7
1070.8
1.03
8.1
36
1.63
60,6
280.8
0.19
23. J
1 .09
38,3
327,9
0.73
22.6
1.19
6.7
1024,2
0,76
8.5
37
1.17
20.3
229.9
1.33
33. U
1.01
10.0
273.2
3.03
30,3
0,56
6.1
650. 1
1.03
13.0
36
0,96
10.1
208.5
2.27
33.2
1.01
7,0
311.2
5.13
27.3
0.85
13.0
751,1
3,05
11.5
39
1.50
19.5
259.3
3.59
30.1
1 .00
6.0
356.3
8.00
2«.l
1.57
17.2
500.0
5.58
16.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A I 11.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
292
-------
APPFNDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH YIAR MAKE MODI CID
019 1973 CMEV NOVA 307
VEH YEAR MAKE MfJDL CID
020 197 3 CHEV MONT 350
VEH YEAR MAKE HODL CID
021 1973 CMlV CAMA 350
MODE
NO,
HC CO C(12
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC CO C02
NO X
MPG
1 2.80 12,8 702.0 3.70 12.1
2 1 .31 9. 1 726.7 2.01 1 1 ,9
3 1 .89 6.9 1 1 IB.9 2.91 7.8
4 1.81 6.9 601.1 2.17 10.«
5 3.00 10,0 181.8 J.75 17.5
6 2.01 7.7 445.6 2.60 19.1
7 2.UB 80.7 <171.5 3.11 IU.6
8 2.81 46,4 <170.0 3.17 16.1
9 3.55 38.« 486.5 <1.35 15.8
10 2.79 21,8 509.9 3.17 16,0
11 2.36 101.8 522.7 2,97 12.9
12 3.55 37.1 642.6 1.36 12.5
13 1,02 122.3 603.7 3.13 11.0
11 2,15 32,0 178,8 3,11 16.5
15 3.96 16,6 528.0 2.35 15.7
16 9.08 19.a 1285.B 3.12 6,6
17 2.91 28.1 595,1 3.80 13.7
18 2.62 17.5 551.5 2,66 1S.0
19 2.10 22.1 539.2 3.00 15,3
20 3,01 18,9 676.5 3.01 12.1
21 5.37 122,8 527,7 2,23 12,1
6.83 71.3 815,6
5,31 50.1 853.9
6.10 18.3 1191,3
2.62 20,9
2.03 14.3
1,89 17,7
2.15 87.0
2,27 65,6
2,25 61.5
2.05 13.9
3.09 128.0
3.23 92.1
1.04 127.4
2.2* 67.2
2,64 44,1
599,9
175.0
628.5
467.8
707.1
456.0
680.3
522.9
756.6
690.2
633.1
694.3
6.20 90,2 1559,0
2.71 35,1 598.4
2.53 59,6 666.1
2.48 11,1 600.1
2,66 50.5 768,2
4.22 195,6 581,3
4.69 9.1
1.73 9,3
1.83 6.9
¦ 1.92 13.8
3,10 17.6
1.98 13,4
2.32 11.5
2.71 10,9
2.36 15.7
2.22 11,7
2.12 12.1
2.93 9.7
2.80 9.8
1.89 1 1,9
1,07 11.5
1.86 5.2
3.19 13.4
1.98 11.6
2.87 13.1
1.92 10.3
1.57 9,8
3.66 28.5 803.1
3.75 15.6 846.1
7.40 13.8 1196.8
3.06 7.0 741.0
2.32 7.6 614.6
2.16 5.4 571.2
2.60 84,1 613.3
2,25 29,1 621.8
2.27 33.4 588.1
2,25 9,8 625.4
3.23 111.2 611.7
3.18 29.3 769.1
3.55 104.7 674.3
2,11 20,2 578.6
3.46 12.0 614.0
7.12
2.57
1 .88
18.4 1354,8
39.5 573.3
14,4 681,5
2.10 40.0 553.6
2.64 16.4 797.9
3.10 138,9 626.3
4.57 10.3
2.07 10.1
1.62 7.1
2.94 11.7
5.18 14.0
2.25 15.1
1.44 11,8
2.96 13,2
5.68 13,7
3.00 13,7
4.88 11.1
3.40 10.B
5.19 10.4
2.52 14,4
1.08 15,8
0,95 6,5
5.91 13.8
2,30 12.5
5.06 14,2
2.49 10./
2.57 10.4
22
3.28
60.5
634.3
2.92
12.0
2.61
101.9
327.0
1.95
17.9
2,94
36.1
712.6
2.25
11.4
25
4 .49
37.2
761 .5
3.51
10.6
3.75
66.3
209.7
3.B5
27.2
4,59
27.6
823.6
4.07
10.1
21
2.37
44.0
155.1
3.91
16.7
2.62
96.5
305.8
2.84
19.1
1 .90
54.J
571.9
5.00
11,0
25
2.02
23.7
526.2
2.93
15,6
2,26
55.8
180,8
1.73
32.2
1.70
19,4
591.7
2.65
11. 1
26
4.70
22.9
810.8
3.27
10.3
J.75
51.5
155.7
1.55
35.7
5.08
18.5
882.5
1.57
9.6
27
3.16
111.1
529.3
3.31
1?.1
3.51
126.9
400.0
2.91
H.5
2.65
65.5
637. 1
5.08
11.9
28
2.6B
30.8
577.1
2.77
14.0
2.29
53.6
172.5
1.71
33.6
1.85
19.3
664.2
2.56
12.7
29
3.94
32.5
734 .5
3.12
11,1
3.37
46.0
145.8
3.32
38.3
3,08
17.8
825.4
4.01
10.3
30
2.40
57.6
463.8
1.01
15.8
2.91
75.0
242.7
2.46
24.0
2.20
61.3
579.3
4.55
13.0
31
2.06
30.7
549.0
2.JO
14.7
2.14
95.7
303,7
1.70
19.2
1 .93
40.0
617.7
2.67
12.9
32
4.26
26.2
794,0
2.81
10,5
3.83
83.9
266,3
I.«5
21.6
3,81
JJ.l
864,0
2.23
9.6
SUM
2,?l
36.3
516,2
2.75
15.3
2.15
56.2
539.3
2.12
14.0
1.77
28.8
612.3
3,07
13.4
RAG
2.25
53.2
567.5
3,05
13.5
2.71
98.6
667.9
2.23
10,7
2,06
42,9
664,8
3.63
12,0
33
0.74
8.1
182.8
0.60
14.8
0,40
5.0
147.6
0.02
56.6
0.28
0.8
109.4
0.07
79,6
31
5.54
13.2
1678,9
3.23
5.2
3.79
62.3
1829.4
0. 33
4.6
2.17
5.1
1333.4
O.bl
6.6
35
3,67
21,8
916,1
1 .92
8.9
l ,03
19.2
1006,2
0.27
8.5
0.62
9.4
954.3
0.69
9.1
3h
1.56
1.3
576.5
0.80
15.1
0.70
17.5
715.4
0.64
11.9
0.57
7.0
621.5
0.42
14.0
37
1.32
1.7
369,1
0.89
23,3
I.18
16.7
508,7
0,10
16,5
0.71
1.9
488,8
0.17
17.9
38
0.85
6.7
357.9
1 .69
23.9
0.81
9.8
512,1
1 .36
16.7
0,18
3.5
440.5
1.32
19,8
39
0,75
15.5
398,6
2.51
20.9
0.91
21.6
567,6
2.81
11.7
0.32
1.8
549.6
3.38
15.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER mile (PER MINUTE FOR IOLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL (-CMNtlMY CALCULAT KINS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
2V3
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLF9
HOUSTON
VEH
TEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
HAKE
MODL
CID
022
1973
CHEV
MALI
350
023
1973
CHEV
CAPR
000
020
1973
CHRY
NEWP
000
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPC
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NUX
MPG
1
16.74
68.9
700.2
6.07
9.8
3.06
59.2
1077.7
6.75
7.5
3.17
08,8
901.1
7.00
8.6
2
13.07
52.7
776.1
3.SO
9.9
2.01
56.2
819.3
2.75
9.7
3.05
01.1
822.9
1.90
9.9
3
18,66
51.2
1100.0
2,09
7.2
5.07
116.1
1207,0
0.15
6.1
6.66
56.1
1352.9
3.30
6.1
o
7.16
38,9
719.6
0.12
11.0
3.00
28.0
726,8
3.39
11.0
2.53
17.7
758,2
0,70
11,2
5
0. 29
10.0
602.6
6.38
13.2
1.93
13.7
636.2
3.18
11.0
1.79
11.5
652.3
6.00
13.1
6
U. 16
5,6
568,9
0.30
15.0
1,71
9.3
579.2
0,66
10.8
1.06
6.0
576.2
3,92
10.9
7
5.18
25.6
657,8
7.69
12.0
3,18
115.3
6O0.3
3.07
10.7
2.00
122,2
661.6
6,05
10.3
e
8.06
32.5
592.1
5.19
13.3
7,67
61.8
608.0
3.95
12.2
1.93
35.0
685.2
0.25
11.9
5.22
18.5
622.6
8.32
13.3
0,23
66.5
625.3
5.69
11.9
1.78
50,9
600.5
7.00
12.2
to
0.39
11.5
604.6
5.03
13.9
2.78
26.5
607.5
0.26
12.7
1.58
16.5
691.9
0.57
12.3
11
0.70
56,0
662.0
7.25
11.6
3.00
112,3
711.1
5,09
9.9
3.10
158,0
701.3
5.88
9,2
12
0.63
22.2
702.2
6.09
11.2
2.37
36.8
865.7
6.13
9.5
2.30
17.1
877.0
5.95
9.0
1)
5.19
50,0
706.9
8.83,
11.1
2.75
113.2
810.1
19.90
6.9
2.25
29.5
817.0
10.21
10.2
11
3.23
16.0
507.7
5.12
15.2
1.92
19.1
617.6
0.09
13.0
1.28
11.9
629.2
0.89
13.6
IS
6.98
16.1
577.2
2.32
10.2
2,00
16,8
606,9
1.93
11.2
1.92
17.7
668.0
2.56
12,6
16
16.71
91.9
1237.0
2,36
6.2
6.00
108.1
1651,8
2.90
0.8
5.00
63.1
1522.5
3.61
5.0
17
0.76
37.5
667.7
7,80
12.0
2.08
09.3
700,6
6.30
U.l
2.35
05.6
681.3
6.55
11.7
ie
3.99
11.9
606.6
0,09
13.9
1.60
21.2
750,9
6.16
11.2
1 .80
23.0
628.8
0.21
11.2
19
0.32
27,6
639.6
6,50
12.7
1.75
11.1
621,5
5.52
13.1
2.21
07.8
650.1
5.29
12.1
20
0.91
18.0
720.3
0.77
1 1.6
1 .88
26.9
907,9
0.(17
9.3
2.06
36.8
721.6
0.56
11,3
21
0.23
60.1
683.0
7,86
11.1
1.87
192.2
702.0
3.06
8.0
1.01
127.1
670.0
0.99
10.1
22
0.05
29.2
678.3
5.38
12.0
2.08
69.1
802.9
0.55
9.7
2.26
58.8
757.9
3.60
io.o
23
8.55
05.6
828.7
7.08
9.6
1.11
65.0
1007.0
6.66
7.7
1.11
08,2
958.5
6.66
8.5
24
3.19
16.6
601.0
8.03
13.9
1.71
05.2
661,6
5.05
12.0
1.86
31.7
619.5
6,58
13.1
25
2.83
12.5
560.9
5.39
15.0
1.35
11.2
605.0
5.05
12,6
1.50
25.7
611.0
1.66
13.5
26
10.01
25.6
816.2
3.09
10.0
2.59
58.6
982.5
3.33
8.2
1.27
00.6
893.1
2.93
9.1
27
3.60
30.8
303.5
1.07
22.0
1 .75
51.8
78b.l
7.35
10.1
2.19
011.8
696.5
6.91
1 1.5
28
3.70
1 1.6
616.1
5.07
13.7
1.26
19.1
660,9
0.77
12.7
1.97
37.3
666.7
3.57
12.1
29
7.30
oo,a
760.5
5.81
io.o
2.00
51.9
976,8
0.18
8.3
3.10
02.8
890.2
6.70
9.1
30
1.12
26.3
601.5
7.08
13.6
1.91
71.6
662,6
u.uo
11.0
2,00
59.0
625.0
7.02
12.2
31
2.87
21.2
60O.3
5.73
11.7
1.63
55.2
673,9
0,98
11.6
1 .78
25,0
615.5
3,93
11.0
32
9,00
05.8
015.0
7.00
9.7
2.62
60.7
980,3
3,18
8.1
3.51
06,9
882.9
3.37
9.2
SUM
3.50
21.3
563.0
5.30 10.6
1.63
03.8
668.5
5.15 1
11.9
1.81
36.9
671.1
5,21 1
12.1
SAC
3.50
28.7
608.1
6.61 12.6
2.70
67.2
711.5
0.71 1
10,5
2.01
07.1
731.5
5.28 1
10.9
33
1.23
9.1
162.0
1.10
09.2
0.59
21.5
121,7
0.05
55,3
0.68
20,6
150.2
0.03
08,0
30
6,06
08,0
1170,7
1.53
7.0
6,29
195,2
1552,6
0.83
«.7
5,98
110,0
1908,9
1.27
0.1
35
3.39
01.7
950. 1
1.97
8.6
1.12
06.1
935.9
0 , 90
8.8
2.06
31.3
1033.9
0.55
8.1
36
1,56
28,0
569,2
0.18
10.3
0,82
30.3
616.6
0.63
13.3
1 .98
01.1
662,0
0.39
12.1
37
1,38
9.9
399,7
1.28
21.1
0.86
16.3
076.8
0.52
17.6
1.11
13.0
087.8
1.11
17,3
38
1,06
5,0
381.0
J.31
22.6
0.78
7.1
085,0
3.22
17.8
0.93
3.6
097.9
7.60
17.5
39
1,02
0.5
005.3
6.09
21.o
0.53
5.1
586.0
7.07
10.9
0,78
10.1
620,8
5.99
13.8
EMISSinN RESULTS
IN grams PER
MILE
(PER MINUTE FMH
IDLE)
FUEL
ECONHMY IN MILES per GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR
IDLE)
FUEL ECUNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARRDN TO HYDROC.EN RATIO
290
-------
APPFNDI* 0,CONT'D
LISTING (IF M
-------
APPEND!* D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
HOUSTON
VEH
year
MAKE
NOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MIIDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKt
MODL
CID
• ••
• •••
mmmm
• •••
- - -
- - - -
- - • -
m m m
mmm
....
m m m m
- . _ _
mom
026
1971
FORD
STAM
122
029
1973
FORD
MAVt
200
030
1973
FOPD
MA VE
302
MODE
NU.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MP(,
1
3,28
11.1
382. 1
1.06
19.0
4,38
10.9
581.3
4.85
13.1
8,01
29.7
197,9
1,87
15.6
2
1.82
19.1
188.8
3.11
15.1
4.65
32.7
635.2
3.31
12.7
6,63
105,0
693.7
1.11
10.1
J
6,18
71.2
569, 1
2.40
12.7
6.3d
67.0
666,4
2.68
6.6
1 1 ,93
117,8
940,3
0,77
7.6
4
3.38
51.2
198.7
2.54
18.1
2,69
25.2
520,0
3.60
15.6
1,56
96.6
581 .3
1.24
11.9
5
1 .99
20,9
360. 1
3,68
22.2
2.13
21.9
366.3
1.54
21.7
2.91
35.7
561 . 1
2.84
11.2
fa
2.28
21.5
310.6
2.86
21.9
1.85
7.6
370.9
3.43
22.8
2.77
17.9
503.5
1.73
16.1
7
1.52
25.6
311,8
1.21
21.9
1.95
33.0
116,1
5.26
22.5
3.23
26,6
561.9
3,46
14.1
e
2.16
32.0
350.7
3.81
21.6
1.86
20,0
417.1
1.92
19.5
3.51
106,6
513.2
3,68
12.8
9
1.16
17.1
328.1
6.01
21.7
2.09
31.2
369.2
5.16
20.9
3.61
31,«
551.5
5.73
11.4
10
1.82
15,3
353.5
7.52
23.2
1.68
12.3
420.6
1.31
19.9
3.97
25.9
535.1
3.59
15.1
1 1
1.88
32.2
337.9
3.82
22.5
2,66
53.4
496.7
6.69
15.0
4.60
51.3
517,3
4.08
H.5
12
2.89
28.9
463,8
6.66
17.1
2.87
19.7
545,8
6.04
15.2
5.13
162,2
639,6
1.38
9.7
13
3.02
15.3
195.2
6.90
18.6
3.2b
59.1
498.7
6.91
14.7
5.78
57.2
572,0
4.59
13.0
1U
2.10
21.3
338.1
3.91
23.1
2.56
34,6
376.9
3.92
20.2
3.74
68,6
167.5
2.72
11.6
15
3.76
48.2
167.7
2.47
19.5
3,49
57.9
164.9
1.71
19,0
7.12
78,7
523.1
1,10
13.3
16
8.50
133.9
753,7
3.16
9.0
7.32
97.3
674.8
2.41
8.1
20.16
186,1
919.9
2.09
7.0
1 7
2,19
17,6
315.1
1,91
20,7
3,18
60.5
111.2
1,20
16,5
5,10
86,1
161,0
3.50
11,1
ie
3,63
39.5
158.3
3.12
20.5
2,50
21.2
421.0
3.39
19.1
1,14
68,8
607.6
1.71
12.2
19
2.57
14.8
330.5
1.16
21.7
2.55
36,9
370.0
1,03
20.1
5.05
56,3
120.1
1.81
16.9
20
1.89
15.9
123.9
3.61
17.4
1.0S
31.6
477.8
3,63
16.5
5.57
115,2
695.0
1.45
9.1
21
2.37
38,8
336.2
6.86
21.9
1.86
79.5
411.1
6.30
15.1
5.69
55.2
530. 1
2.56
11.0
22
3.12
36.0
123.4
1,56
18.1
3.25
32.7
510.1
5.39
15.5
5.62
139.9
592,7
2.67
10.7
23
1.25
76.1
437.2
3.46
15.6
1.79
67,0
590.2
5.07
12.5
9.56
103.0
657,0
1.85
10.5
21
1.96
24.1
117.6
4.21
23.1
2.47
34.1
458.5
6.61
17.1
3,63
51.7
500.5
1.13
15.0
25
1.92
20.5
353.8
3.66
22.6
1,89
IS.6
390.8
1.72
21.0
3.71
11.3
198,7
3.36
15.1
2fa
1.95
67,5
536,1
2.95
13.5
1.10
31.2
679.0
1,61
12.0
9.71
107.0
716,6
1 ,66
9.7
27
2.13
00.9
361.5
1.56
20.5
2.96
16.1
189,(4
6.70
15.5
4.39
61,5
551.7
5.11
13.3
26
2.19
21.4
366.1
4.05
21.8
2.17
16.4
417.7
4.59
19.7
5.10
65.8
552,9
2.73
13.2
29
3.59
74.6
396.2
3.06
16.6
3.61
42.6
582.6
6.06
13.4
10.11
99.1
637.0
1.71
10.7
30
1.73
19.9
325.6
5.05
21.5
2.76
37.5
495.0
8.03
15.6
3.66
68. 7
514.9
5.25
13.1
31
2.21
22.0
167.2
1,16
21.7
2.01
16,9
425. 1
5.23
19.2
1.00
5J.6
195.6
3.11
15.0
32
1,90
61.1
535.5
3.85
13,6
4.00
51.4
550,9
3.88
13.8
11.71
116.6
681 .8
2.50
9.6
SUM
2.10
25.2
136.4
3.31 21.2
2.19
23.0
444.9
5.17 16.2
1.11
61.1
516.6
2.82 1
H.2
BAG
2.31
31.0
366.6
4.24 20.6
2.60
17.6
460.1
5.28 1
16.2
1,58
70.8
570.3
3.36 12.6
33
0.92
15.3
111.6
1.02
63.1
0.19
2.0
108,7
0.03
79.0
3.37
11.1
H3.5
0.05
10,5
34
6.14
178.5
598.2
0,16
9.9
4.3U
15.2
1186.3
0.50
7.3
15.88
477.7
957,7
0.71
5.0
35
1.23
60.0
597.9
2.63
12.6
0.93
7.3
747,0
0.25
11.7
12.22
217.6
600,3
l.H
A.6
36
2176
17.3
292,0
0.51
23.7
0.76
4.8
486.2
0.55
17.9
4.17
118.5
386.5
0.21
14,0
37
1.50
8.9
266.2
1 .91
30,9
1.39
5.8
439.1
2.52
19.6
2.35
33.6
120,5
0. 72
18.5
36
1.01
6,9
210.0
1.03
39.6
1.32
3.2
322.0
3.00
26.6
1.57
28.1
386.7
1.12
20.3
39
0,65
3.5
249.1
0.53
34.5
1.31
3.0
379.0
7,14
22.9
2.41
21.5
125.8
1.08
16.8
EMISSION RESULTS
IN grams per
MILE
(PER MINUTE FOR
IDLE)
FUEL
ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR
IDLE)
FUEL
economy calculations assume a
111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
29b
-------
APP1N01* 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF HflDAL RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
make
HOOL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
C1D
mmm.
— - -
- - - -
— - -
- - -
- - —
....
mmm
031
1973
FORD
MUST
1S 1
032
197 5
FORP
TORI
351
rnnE
NO,
HC
en
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
en
CU2
NO*
MPG
a
•
i
•
•
•
¦ •••>•
1
'.37
171.0
132.9
0.76
12.1
5,56
75.3
970,6
5.77
B.O
2
9.00
171.5
595.9
0.90
9.9
6.29
31.5
875,6
3.02
9.3
3
1 3.09
207,7
876.3
1 .09
7.1
1 1 .88
73.7
1112,6
3,63
5.7
1
6.06
118.2
aeo.7
1 .66
12."»
6.29
21.1
783.1
1.92
10.6
5
1.52
91.9
105.6
1 .69
15.6
3.74
8.3
588.1
6.10
H.5
6
1.01
80.1
106.1
1 .60
16.3
3.33
10.3
601.5
2.99
11.1
7
1.81
127,2
398.0
1.67
H.5
3.80
68,2
687 .5
6.30
11.0
e
1.29
lSl.A
11 fl . 9
1.15
13.9
3.25
16.2
685.6
1.21
11.5
9
1.73
105. 1
371.8
1 .71
16.0
2,80
27.1
691,a
8.31
11.9
10
1.75
99,7
115.2
1 ,?3
11.1
2.85
18.6
720 ,2
1.58
11.7
11
5.09
161.1
129.6
1.05
12.7
3.59
80,1
703 .3
7.53
10.6
12
5.76
1U7.2
556.9
1 .32
11 .0
3.70
30.8
907.2
5.53
9.2
13
5.93
173.7
198.8
1 .27
11.2
3,59
18,5
831.1
9.52
9.7
10
2,30
109.3
118.9
1 .37
11.8
2.33
18.0
615.1
1.21
13.0
15
6.25
121.6
115,5
0.80
13.1
1.11
36,8
700 ,6
2.51
11.5
16
19.38
250.6
990.1
1.23
6.1
1 1 .66
132.5
1569,1
3.15
1.9
17
«.63
158.0
18b,7
1.10
11.8
3.88
U9.9
687 ,0
9.02
11.1
16
1.51
99.2
163,8
1.71
11.0
3.18
21,8
725.9
3.30
11.5
19
1.36
112,6
123.2
1 • 29
1" .5
3."3
17.1
579,a
6.87
13.1
20
5.01
108, 1
539.1
1 .86
12.2
1. 06
12. 1
873,7
3.68
9.3
21
5.88
230,0
502.1
1.20
10.1
1.21
119,1
711.0
7.52
9.1
22
5.72
115,8
191.J
1.37
12.0
3.15
11.9
7 7 7,0
1,15
10.1
23
8.03
171,0
652.1
1 .76
9.1
5,68
75.2
1018.1
6.10
7.7
21
1.11
107.2
a26.8
0.93
11.6
2.61
26.0
660,6
7.10
12.5
25
3.92
89.5
118.1
1.79
15.5
2,09
16.3
631,2
1.11
13.3
26
7.96
150.6
666.2
1.12
9.6
5.18
11.7
971.9
3.11
8.1
27
1.92
H9.3
187.9
1.50
12.0
2.9a
38.1
7 11,5
9.3"
11.3
28
5,36
101.2
132.2
1.18
11.6
2.52
22.7
690,1
1.09
12.1
29
7.57
150.fl
591.7
1.82
10,1
5.22
81.1
928.9
5.12
8.3
30
1. 39
126.3
117 .5
1.71
11.5
2.69
39.2
685,1
8,13
11.7
31
1.20
99.9
131.7
1.53
H.7
2.31
22.1
656,6
1.92
12.7
32
6.78
i e»«s. a
639.5
1.31
9.5
5.27
56.6
982.6
3,61
8.2
SUM
1.16
116.6
119,9
1.21
13.7
2.67
30.6
665,6
1.22
12.3
BAG
a ,
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING or MODAL results on individual vehicles
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
031
1973
FORD
STAW
400
0 35
1973
MAZD
RX2
70
036
1973
MEHC
MARQ
429
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
4,23
74, 1
716.0
5.19
10,5
9,47
40,9
628,9
2.49
12.1
9,67
65,9
650.3
1.91
10.9
2
5.23
19,9
752,3
2.81
11.1
11.84
60.5
661,3
1.59
11.2
0,76
74,8
910,9
3.82
8.3
3
a.96
2«.7
1209,1
2.65
7.0
18.92
66.4
751.8
1,90
9.7
10.94
40,6
1099,3
2.28
7.3
4
3.21
37.2
809,0
4.29
10.1
8,25
42.1
552.6
2.27
13,8
4,83
17.9
583.0
1.00
14,2
5
2.06
33.5
773,7
4.81
10.7
4,84
24.5
454.8
3.03
17.4
2.87
20.2
529,6
2.09
15.6
6
2.11
17.a
658.8
2,36
12.0
a.06
23.6
411,7
l.«6
19.2
3.23
13.7
579.4
4.81
1«.5
7
3.00
151.2
678.4
6.71
9.6
4.31
23.9
414.6
2.29
19.1
3.11
21.6
464.8
1.78
17.5
S
2.70
64,0
803,9
3.30
9.7
3,63
51,6
472,1
1.44
15.7
5.32
113,1
663,8
4.22
10,3
9
<1.01
130.2
711,4
3.71
9.6
3.62
2«.S
409.0
2.60
19.3
4.08
34.0
489.1
2.22
16.0
10
2.91
37,6
778,8
2."7
10.5
2,68
26,6
505,0
1.45
16.0
4.43
28.5
707.8
6.99
11.6
1 1
4.90
236,5
758,8
5.64
7.7
5,75
64,2
465.6
1.75
15.2
4.47
59,8
535.2
3.04
13,8
12
3.60
67,2
1009,7
4.19
7.9
3.69
42.1
627.2
2.00
12.6
6,37
63,5
898,9
9,67
8.7
13
5.27
206,1
062.7
5.37
7.4
5.72
57.3
490.1
2.56
14,6
4,70
33.7
669.9
5.02
12.0
10
2.67
53.1
733.0
2,78
10.8
2.89
32.5
471.6
1.42
16.7
3.94
29.7
655.0
7.63
12.4
15
6.51
36,2
690,5
1
11.5
6,03
28.3
572.4
1.05
14.0
10.09
28.9
705,1
3.19
11.3
16
11.02
62.5
1361.3
3.08
5.9
21.75
92.5
1317,5
2.08
5.8
16.39
65.9
1501.5
3.H9
5.4
17
3.«.0
4,84
42.0
605.8
1.11
12.9
5.71
43,4
891 .6
7.99
9.1
21
6.19
201.4
760.2
6.19
8.1
7,08
105.2
428.1
1.18
14.4
3.22
96.3
496.3
1.85
13.5
22
3.83
88,9
855.8
3.85
8.8
4.23
52,6
553,6
1.27
13.7
7.92
175. 1
824.0
4. 33
7.9
23
6,71
70.7
1003.9
5.65
7.8
6.61
42,8
642,1
2.49
12.2
10,08
87,7
632.5
1.95
11,1
21
3.53
71.7
736.8
5.79
10.3
3.64
54.4
426.2
1.43
17.0
2.75
35.3
556.2
3.66
14.3
25
2.31
46.5
741 .4
3.44
10,8
2,94
36.2
470.5
1.17
16.5
3.70
35.8
649.8
7.28
12.4
26
6.87
67.9
1062.3
2.74
7.5
6.93
29.6
836.5
1.27
9.8
13.02
45. 3
952.0
4,43
8.3
27
a.59
131.7
797.2
6.20
8.7
4.55
96.5
458,8
1 .89
14.2
3.29
42.7
653.9
5.47
12.1
26
3.60
45,9
713.9
3.23
11.1
3. 19
22.3
516,2
1.39
15.8
4.71
34.5
688,4
6.84
11.7
29
5.11
45.0
964 .9
5.70
8.4
5.41
31 .8
631,6
3.18
12.7
8.64
48,8
622.0
2.00
12.2
30
3.93
90,8
727.6
6. 38
10.1
2.98
38.0
457,9
2,24
16.8
2.55
31.3
549.9
3.20
14.6
31
2,56
73.3
793.8
3.84
9.7
2.73
28.4
515,7
1.54
15.6
3.82
44. 1
703,0
6.97
11.3
32
6,56
01,6
1172.1
3.18
6.7
7,56
45,0
822,4
1 .49
9.7
11.07
45.3
963.8
5.21
8.3
SUM
3.08
59.3
728, 1
5.44 I
10.7
3.05
29.6
482.7
1.43 :
16.5
4.55
37.1
566.0
3.59 :
13.9
BAU
4.08 104.0
847,8
4.20
8.7
4,54
55,5
507,8
1 .47 1
14,6
4.61
58.1
687.4
5.05 :
1 1.2
33
0.04
1.3
92.«
0,00
92.5
1,18
7.2
65,0
0.02
no
5.12
16.5
159.4
0.92
44.0
30
4.23
5.3
1102.4
0,50
7.9
18,20
162,0
1133.4
0.84
6. 1
10.21
86. 1
1324.5
1.54
5.9
35
2.17
8,0
781.6
0.69
11.1
3.92
36.7
1002.2
0.41
8.3
18.84
61.4
901 .4
2.99
8.4
36
1 .66
8.3
666,7
0,88
13.0
1.82
14.7
651.0
0.36
13.1
3.35
19. 1
543.0
0.29
15.2
37
1 .40
5.7
533,4
3,80
16.2
0.35
J.2
474,0
0.20
18.5
3.64
11.9
382.5
1.00
21.5
36
1.57
10.4
592,8
3.12
14.5
0.32
6.3
355,1
0.79
24.2
1 .41
7.9
351 .3
0,89
24.1
39
1.91
11.2
648.1
10.45
13.2
0.33
0.9
406.3
1.39
21.7
2.08
18.6
383.8
2.54
21.2
EMISSION RESULTS
IN GRAMS PER
MILE
(PER MINUTE FOR
1 IDLE)
FUf L
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLUN FOR
IDLt)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A III.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
298
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VFH1CLES
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
Vt H
YFAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
0 37
1*971
OLOS
CUTL
350
038
197J
11L0S
DELT
055
039
1973
PLYM
SATE
MODE
Nil ,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NUX
1
2
J
3.25
a.75
8.63
7.0
18,9
13.1
619.7
861 .2
1292,8
2.65
2.68
1.72
13,8
9.8
6,6
0,99
0.70
8.83
37.9
31.0
55.5
908,0
798.8
1222.6
11.73
5.31
1,70
8.7
10.3
6.6
7.25
5.77
8.52
108.2
108,6
231.5
679.5
722.0
1027.5
0.15
3.10
2.73
a
5
6
3.10
2.17
2.1"
5.9
5.0
".3
703.1
593.9
526,6
1.98
2,00
1 .83
12.3
10.6
16.0
3.50
2.17
1.85
20,2
6.3
U.8
708.0
607.1
562.0
6.02
8.59
5.90
11.8
13.1
15.0
3,98
3.28
2.86
83.1
59.2
06,0
655.0
670.3
055.1
3.79
5.20
3.97
7
8
9
2. 77
2.71
2.79
39.2
<19.6
16.9
579.6
523.7
51 8 .5
3.«2
2.83
0.96
13,7
10.5
16,0
2.26
1.76
1.98
11.9
13.7
8.5
726.5
653.9
668.9
11.65
9.82
10.93
11.8
13.0
12.9
3.66
3.15
3.29
08.7
62.9
06.8
580.2
525.?
529.8
7.05
0.95
7.67
I n
II
12
1,08
2.90
3.10
8.9
16.5
10.9
568.0
609,8
758,8
2.98
6,21
3.72
15,0
13.0
11.3
1.65
1 .96
2.23
6.5
13.8
8.5
630,8
790,8
823,6
8.60
13.83
12.26
13,6
10,8
10.5
3.05
0.32
0.56
06.7
BO.O
79.1
536,6
620.8
693. 1
5.70
7.05
7.11
1)
10
15
3.35
2.25
3.51
I2.fi
7.5
8.6
771.1
507.6
621.9
6.69
2.95
2.02
11,0
15.7
13.7
2.01
1.60
3.35
18.0
6.#
17.5
800,3
620,8
620.8
10.88
10.58
0.59
10.1
13.9
13.0
0,86
3.50
5.00
90 .0
5b. 6
77.9
7 03.1
511.7
553.1
8. 38
5,66
2.93
16
1 7
16
8.19
2.61
2.27
10.6
7.8
0.9
1UJ0.1
702.0
609,5
3.17
«.73
2.05
6.0
12.3
13.0
H. 10
2.63
2.30
69.8
20.2
13.2
1306.2
668. 7
096.8
0.92
1 0.59
8.06
6.2
12.5
12.2
13.02
0,09
0.18
303 ,0
115,8
67.2
1073.6
558.9
591 .2
3.03
5.71
0 . 26
19
20
21
2. 19
2.66
3.35
7.7
15.7
95,0
631 .2
793.2
soj.i
3.98
2.52
3.59
1 3.7
10,7
13.«
2.35
2.95
2.«U
21 .3
16,8
21.5
589.8
857,5
783.1
7.85
9.88
13. 28
10.1
9.9
10,8
0.12
5.02
<1,82
102. 1
111.0
136.2
517.2
665.9
025.2
5. 1 1
3.62
5.19
22
?3
2«
3.10
<1,86
2.32
05.3
21.9
9.2
700.8
950,5
605.1
2.67
3.17
0 .95
11.3
8.9
10.2
2.58
5.08
2.08
12.2
00.9
U.«
7 79.5
957 .8
666.0
11.81
1 1 .70
12.29
11.0
8.5
12.8
5.12
7.07
0,06
100.2
109.0
102.2
657.0
703.8
5«0. 3
5.0?
o.o7
5.60
25
26
27
2.1«
5.00
2.50
6.9
13.0
9.7
563.5
883,9
722.7
3.17
0 .09
5.90
15.3
9.6
11.9
1.71
5.1 1
2.05
7.0
30.0
20,5
579.}
851.2
755.8
8.95
6.32
10.71
10.9
9.6
11.1
3.75
P.03
0,68
66. 1
173.1
98,0
520.8
701 .5
620.8
5.26
3.01
6.63
?B
29
10
2.13
3.63
2.««
5.6
7.7
15.5
619.1
905.5
623.9
2,88
3.17
5.29
10.0
9.5
13.5
2.10
O.ai
2.09
10.1
06,3
19.7
665.3
829.7
660.0
8.69
8.07
12.52
12.9
9.7
12.7
0.72
6,88
0,0 3
76.7
109.2
79.2
500,5
673.2
519.2
5.25
3.19
5.10
31
32
2.06
5.07
15.8
27.5
590.7
P75.8
3.12
3.09
10.2
9.5
1 .81
5.12
9.2
33.3
690.3
925.2
11.18
7.82
12.0
8.9
3.92
8.99
88,0
167.0
571 ,0
739.3
5. 1 1
3.57
MPG
'.5
".I
6.3
10
5.6
It .B
12.8
9.5
8.6
SUM
2.22
12.6
613.6
3.16
13.9
2.08
13.a
638.3
8,83
13.3
3.85
67. 1
550.9
6.35 13.3
HAG
2.36
21.0
679. 1
3.67
12.3
2.21
16.6
752.2
9.73
11.3
0.21
90. 7
615.2
5.25 11.5
33
0.50
0.8
130.3
0.00
60,8
1.29
11,8
1 09.1
0.23
67.0
0.99
00.2
90. 6
0.00 55,1
30
0.98
9.5
1650.2
0.00
5.3
7.90
83.0
1737.7
6.70
0.7
8.75
357.0
1223.7
0.11 0.9
35
1 .09
7.1
1080.6
0.00
8.1
0.50
08,6
686.2
0.60
11.0
1 1
156.5
806,7
0,19 8.3
36
0.96
3.8
705.6
0.35
12.0
2.19
17.0
630.6
1,16
13.3
2.30
79,2
566.3
0.13 12,7
37
1.20
2.8
069.7
1.39
18.6
1.30
6.7
026.7
1.15
20.1
2,36
10.8
007.5
1.06 20.3
38
1 .26
3.2
071.5
1.73
18.5
1.10
0.0
067,8
5,20
18.6
2.35
10.8
036.5
7.83 19.3
39
1.06
5.2
520,0
2.75
16.6
0.89
o.3
093,7
8,96
17.6
2.90
20.5
093,5
11.10 16.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONUMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A IH.8S CARBON TM HYDROGEN RATIO
29
-------
APPENOIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
• ••
• • • •
• ••*
- - - -
• ••
m m m
mmmm
mmmm
- - - -
mmm
m m m
• •••
- - -
040
1973
PLYM
FURY
360
041
1973
PONT
VENT
350
042
1973
PONT
BONN
400
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
HPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPt
1
11.13
183.5
705.0
«.J2
8.6
1 1.54
125,6
704,0
3,90
9.5
6,21
138.7
70b,7
6.73
9,4
2
8.39
197,3
682,5
2.11
8.7
6,02
65.6
708,7
1,66
10.6
7.02
108.b
786,0
1.22
9.1
3
13.31
355,6
928.0
1 .58
5.8
16,63
193,1
1031,9
1.84
6.4
12.89
294.3
1076.8
3.00
S.b
tt
5,60
171.8
621 .a
2,70
9.8
5,61
57.6
721,0
2,20
10.7
5.44
68.2
740.2
5.68
10.3
5
5.71
86.7
579.0
5,«2
12.2
2.11
18,4
576.7
11,00
l«.s
5.21
22.4
647.8
5.80
12.8
6
a. 12
111.0
aau,9
2.16
14,0
2.29
15.2
437,3
5.69
19.1
5,42
40.9
552,5
2,89
14.0
7
5.32
116,1
595.6
a,87
11.2
4,24
31.«
592,8
1 1.78
15,5
4,25
118,9
649,4
6.76
9.9
8
a. 08
83.0
565,6
3,58
12.5
5,72
35.9
494,3
7.24
15.8
4,28
17.2
599.1
5.16
12.9
9
a,67
117,4
558,3
a,03
11.7
4.46
26,0
546,2
14,09
14,8
2.68
38.0
648.9
8.58
12.a
10
a.73
90.6
509,9
2.91
15.1
a.ii
21.1
501,8
7,59
16.2
4.97
38.0
617.1
5.07
12,8
1 1
5. 38
182.8
657.4
5,16
9.2
5.57
56.7
579,9
14,31
12.9
5.87
70,6
739.4
10.a7
10.3
12
6. 10
105.3
683.0
4.19
10.2
5.10
26.8
635,5
10,07
13.0
5.78
Sl.l
765.2
7.as
10.3
1}
6.75
212.1
676,7
4,00
8.6
5.50
57.4
675.8
7.50
11.4
4.63
81 ,6
829,4
11.95
9.1
la
a.91
89.5
519.6
5.22
13.1
J.21
22.8
481,2
4,68
16,8
4,09
55,5
S7S.7
5.04
13,8
IS
7.91
138,9
501 .0
1.52
11.9
9.50
49.5
474.2
3,62
15.5
5.53
100.1
556.0
2.95
12. 1
lb
15.47
"06,9
1057,2
1.97
5.1
24.40
212.7
900, 1
#.53
6.8
21.69
347 ,8
1053.7
2.8b
5.3
17
5.48
186,7
608.8
4,20
9.7
6.51
78.0
629.8
«.57
11.5
4.48
101.6
695.3
6.87
10.2
18
5.17
160.2
498.7
2.06
11.6
4.02
31.4
550,1
1.96
14.5
4.52
55.5
248.0
3.41
25.a
19
6. ia
191.5
530,4
2.48
10.4
6.27
56.2
552,1
10.94
15.4
".25
69.5
677.4
b. 16
1 1.1
20
7.88
219.8
582.6
1,80
9.5
6.09
34.5
565.1
7.59
15.9
8,02
81.3
693.6
3.86
10.5
21
6.58
258,7
607,8
3.87
8,6
5.52
99,1
60S,5
5.39
11.4
4, 79
2ia.i
744.5
6.84
8.1
22
6.61
1 a l. 8
626.9
3,44
10,2
4.65
48,3
580, a
3,36
15.2
5,09
72.0
bb2,2
5.22
11.2
23
11.16
241 .6
777.9
4,82
7.4
11.55
122.2
770,0
4,04
6.9
8,40
124.9
845,2
b.ao
8.3
2a
a.as
136.0
596.8
".73
10,8
3.16
27.5
581,9
10,05
14.0
3.49
56,0
651,1
7.55
11.tt
25
3,6a
85.5
505.7
2.36
13.6
5,26
18,0
487,0
6.82
16,9
5.76
55.5
575,5
5.87
13,8
2b
13.02
252.8
697.9
2.07
7.8
12.93
72.3
704,a
6.61
10.3
9.35
140.i
763.0
a.53
fl.e
27
5.50
185.6
692.8
4,99
8.9
4,59
51.7
614.3
S.89
12.5
3.82
43.9
781.3
10.5a
10.3
28
6.19
108. 1
501 .4
2,67
12.6
4.47
30.U
505.2
4.80
15.6
4,54
48.3
611.2
5.28
12.7
29
11.2a
233.8
750.7
3,81
7.7
10.22
116.0
727,0
3,80
9.4
7.93
112,1
79a,6
5.21
8.9
30
«.67
157,5
575,7
4,26
10.6
2.9b
2®.2
586,4
11.53
14,0
3.59
73.6
6ao,2
H . 05
11.6
31
a.03
109.a
551,2
2.55
12.1
5.36
19.5
S18.7
7.24
15,8
3.57
"1.3
624. 1
5.a3
12.7
32
13,55
224,8
700,9
2,08
8. 1
12,12
62.3
656,4
14.46
11.2
5.06
1 a2.1
768. 1
a.16
8.8
SUM
a.93 :
129.6
566,4
3.88 11.3
4.79
38.5
516,2
6.65 :
15.0
3.77
62,2
632.9
">.77
12.0
BAG
5.a6 :
163,9
640. 1
5.51
9.7
4,45
44.7
557.2
6.42 :
11.5
4.43
71.7
729.9
6.52
10.4
33
1.91
5a.i
80,7
0.05
51.7
2.75
53.7
125.0
0.86
47.5
1,28
44.2
94,2
0,08
5-2.9
3a
11.95
Ml.2
1136,8
0,64
1.2
21.89
a 17. o
738.2
0.33
6.1
16,96
590,3
1336.J
2.91
J.a
35
5.17
298.5
716.3
0.38
7,"
1 1 .62
11 a .9
778.4
2.00
8.9
7,60
292.8
S68, a
0,16
e.u
3b
3,61
193.6
558.9
0.37
10. 1
10.51
83.1
395,6
0,36
15,9
4,63
17b.9
536.2
0.32
10.7
37
3.3b
95.3
401 .8
2.14
15.8
4,89
14.6
358, 1
1 .94
22.4
2.81
50.2
a25,7
1 ,b5
17.3
36
a.17
142,4
404,6
2.19
15.6
2,76
18,6
334,a
5.57
23,8
1 .67
14.8
519,5
2.32
16.2
39
2.20
31.2
564.6
6.41
14.5
2.21
9.9
410,5
7,63
20.5
1 ,aa
7,5
606,3
6.92
11.3
EMISSION RESULTS
IN GRAMS PER
MILE
(PER MINUTE FOR
IDLE)
FUEL
ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR
IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A III.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3UU
-------
APPENDIX D.CIJNT'O
LISTING OF MOD A I. RESULTS ON INOIVIPUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VFH YFAR
043 1973
hake modl cm
toyo cnsn i?n
VEH VF AR MAKF MODI CID
014 197 J VULK SERA 97
VEH TEAR MAKE MIJOL CID
045 197 3 VOL" STAw 103
HOOF
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
Cll
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
C(1
CO?
NUX
MPb
1
2
3
1.63
1.37
7.70
16.6
22.5
36.1
371.2
«7B,0
571.2
5.0«
5.77
3.51
19.3
lb,ft
1 3.6
7.21
7.73
12.81
86,8
84,0
133.5
507, 1
371 .7
502,8
7.01
2.72
2.73
13.3
16.8
11.8
5.71
0.08
7.33
61.3
65. H
100.4
607. 1
660.9
916.8
0.97
t .SO
1 ,36
12.3
11.4
8,1
4
5
6
2.99
1 .87
1. b2
27.3
12,6
8.7
390,6
333,6
283.1
3.58
7.01
1.76
20.0
21.7
29.1
5.98
3.71
3.07
54.4
43.0
43.9
393,8
368.3
335. 1
5.01
6.34
3.71
17.8
19.8
21.5
3.10
2.06
1.81
52.2
30.u
27.1
576.9
475,4
364.8
2.00
3.33
1 .83
13.3
16.8
21.5
7
8
9
1.62
2.70
2.04
25,0
110.7
ao.3
333.5
270,5
323.3
1.36
3.13
5,25
23.5
19.6
22,6
2.97
2.88
3.21
35.1
60.1
68.9
364.9
332.7
395.0
7,26
3.54
7,76
20.7
20.3
17.3
2.04
1 ,6b
1.96
41.7
50.0
40.6
422.6
398.8
374. J
3.50
3.04
2.92
17.9
18.4
20.0
10
1 1
12
2.2b
2. «0
3.SO
10.7
bb, 7
93,9
362.3
294.7
138.7
7 .19
2.18
7,16
20,5
21.8
11.9
3.05
3.75
4.58
40.0
43.6
61.1
314.3
376.5
410,2
4.61
6,52
4,b0
21.3
19.4
17.0
1.73
2.78
2.45
34 , H
69,2
65.2
403.5
413,7
502.9
2.37
2.79
2.78
19.1
16,7
14.5
1 3
14
15
3.97
3.10
5.01
88.7
17.1
10,4
118.5
317.6
361.1
6.10
6,07
3.79
15.6
20.5
20.2
5.77
3.18
b.19
81.3
45.0
41.1
381.9
326.5
329.1
6.19
3.89
3.16
16.6
21.8
21.5
3.33
1.77
2.45
81,0
44.8
42.9
167 , b
382. 1
U85.4
3.85
2.11
1 .00
14.7
19,4
15.8
lb
17
IH
10.30
3.51
2.67
103.1
15.8
17.5
781.5
365.1
113.1
3.72
7.61
6.50
9.1
19.8
10,5
18.28
6,25
1.19
195. 1
80.3
13.2
656.9
360,2
421 .9
4.23
6,26
5.66
8.7
17.5
17.6
6,60
2.97
3.21
105.8
48,6
64.4
1Ib2.4
429.2
472 .3
1.61
3.35
2.15
6.6
17.2
15.2
19
20
*1
2.70
2.87
3. Ob
21.5
27.7
52.1
381.1
505.3
330.7
6.09
5.98
5.68
20.7
15.9
21.0
3.97
5.11
1.22
50,3
56.3
69,6
358.7
488.0
342.6
6,57
6,42
5.31
19.7
14.9
19. 1
2,83
4.07
3.11
39.7
92.3
73.8
32b.4
541 .0
393.1
2.3b
2.12
2«b5
22.3
12.7
17.1
??
23
24
4. Ifl
1.53
2.28
80.5
56, b
33.3
393.8
150,6
370.9
1.00
5.96
7.90
16.6
16,0
20.6
1.22
7.65
3.39
63,2
86.1
43.7
387.8
432.9
337,2
3.86
6.06
6,05
17.7
15.0
21.3
3.02
4.69
1.95
84.0
64.2
38,0
512.8
619.9
427.b
2.61
3.17
3.53
13.6
12.1
18.0
25
2b
27
1 .90
3.96
2.81
25.2
39.9
51 .b
319.1
525.1
101.2
7.05
6,31
8.55
22.5
11.8
18,1
2.67
6.90
4,78
17.8
88.3
91.7
312,9
452,7
436,9
3.14
4.19
6.54
22.4
14.5
14.8
1.77
3,87
3.11
38,9
58.0
69,0
403.3
692.9
473.0
2.56
1.62
3.44
18.9
11.1
15.0
28
29
30
2.37
3,19
1.79
?2.7
31.5
20.2
371.3
129.7
330.3
7.81
6.77
7.21
21.3
17.9
2«.l
3.26
6,59
2.83
42.8
85.2
36.5
333.6
396.5
347 ,9
1.07
6,74
6.33
21.6
16. 1
21.4
2,09
3.94
2.00
44,2
50. 7
37.9
113.1
600. 1
427.6
1 ,89
2.73
3.56
18,1
12.8
18.0
31
32
2.20
3.93
41.5
15.1
383.0
527 .6
5.13
5.12
19.3
11.5
2.73
12.91
68,9
141.6
322.2
105.3
2.74
2.76
20.2
13.3
1.87
4. 36
66, 7
73.4
423. 1
706.0
2.47
1 .65
11>, 6
10.6
SUM
2,07
30.8
364,9
6.39 21.1
2.97
38.?
360,4
5,59 20.7
2.11
47.3
425.5
2.34 17.5
HAG
2.75
54.5
386,2
5.75 18.5
4.20
66,U
396.2
5.62 17,3
2.22
59.5
447,6
2.50 16.2
33
0,55
5.7
39.9
0.00 175
0,57
3.7
60,5
0.09 130
1.70
29.2
146.7
0.59 44.8
34
2.97
36.8
728.9
0,05 11.1
5.52
98.0
715.6
1.85 9.7
2.50
189.4
1287.1
0.70 5.6
35
1 .59
26.2
139.9
0.22 18.3
1 .97
23.9
589. 0
1,13 11,0
1,08
102.3
953.2
1.16 7.9
36
1.81
48,2
385. 1
0.27 19,0
1.34
19.1
383,6
1.21 21.2
0,49
47.6
562.9
0.41 13.9
37
0.75
6.7
331.5
1.63 25.6
0.93
5.5
321.0
3,26 26,7
0,92
37.3
367.2
0.55 20.7
38
0.23
3.1
298. 1
2.94 29,2
0,88
4.9
301,3
5.56 28.5
1.04
22.9
291.5
1 .26 26.8
39
0.85
2.7
347.9
11.58 25.0
0.90
5.3
322.3
8.07 26.6
0.75
16.7
305.S
2,27 26.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER mjl£ (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUFL ECONOMY IN MILtS PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLt)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,05 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
301
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR MAKE MOOL CID
OUb 1972 BUIC LESA 350
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CIO
047 J 972 BUIC ELEC 455
VEH YFAR MAKE MODL CID
OaB 1972 CHEV VEGA 140
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NflX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
5.5b
5.8V
12.95
69.8
75.0
137.2
922.5
656.9
1352.5
7.53
4,68
5.19
8.5
11.2
5.5
4.53
3.45
5,61
33.3
21.3
49.9
924.7
952.0
1298.8
10.72
7.37
7.4B
9.0
8.9
6.4
4.73
4.25
6.45
53.7
39.2
45,0
481 .6
794.1
792.5
2.06
2.11
2,06
15.3
10.2
10.0
4
5
6
4,96
3.48
3.03
55.1
27,4
16.1
727.2
570,6
512.4
6.07
8,86
4.85
10,7
14,2
16,2
2,30
2.17
1.75
IS.7
7.9
6.1
780,9
620,1
639,8
9,66
17,50
9.47
10.9
13.9
13.6
2,78
2.34
1 .97
17.3
26,0
15,5
497.2
389.2
417,0
2.02
5.11
4,00
16.6
20,3
19,8
7
8
9
4.22
3.25
3.20
82.7
66.4
43.6
587.3
538.7
542.5
6.67
4.85
7.59
12.1
13.6
14.3
3.10
1.74
1.75
17.6
31.2
10.7
605.7
746.7
585.3
16.66
12.07
16,05
13.8
U.O
14.6
3.04
2.21
1 .62
54.1
39.4
27.4
391.2
366.0
352.3
4.58
J.31
4.78
18.3
20.4
22.2
10
1 1
12
3.29
3.79
3.83
41.2
90.7
51.6
555.5
687.6
719.5
4.82
6,78
5.86
14.1
10.5
10,9
1.87
1.93
2,40
8.7
n.7
n.i
697,1
744,0
957,4
13.81
16.40
12.31
12.4
11.5
9.0
1.53
2.97
2.21
14.8
58,8
28,4
387.6
433.0
494.3
3.71
3.40
3.62
21.3
16.6
16.3
13
14
15
3.76
2.63
4.26
65,7
34.5
44,9
797.2
533.5
616.3
8,92
4.31
3,28
9,7
14,9
12.7
2.03
1.79
2,88
15.1
9.1
11.2
883,0
668.7
693,0
21.14
13.86
8.27
9.7
12.9
12.3
3.60
1 .62
2.51
67,7
21.9
15.6
480.8
376.2
370.9
3, 8ft
2.98
2.05
14,8
21.3
22.0
16
17
18
11.10
3.86
3.35
134,8
64,6
34.1
1471.0
649.6
628.3
«.I7
7.17
4.31
5.2
11.6
12.8
5.61
1,90
2.19
40.5
21.9
11.1
1595.6
759.7
760,3
7.76
12.60
13.76
5.3
U.l
11.3
14.61
3.88
2.10
32.7
66,5
23.2
751.8
451.9
468.0
3.45
2.37
2.74
10.4
15.6
17.4
19
20
21
3.46
4.17
4.86
41.6
40,6
173,2
584.2
774.1
703.8
6,79
5.50
5.56
13.4
10,4
9.0
1.49
2.71
2.76
10.2
16.1
60.2
694,7
966.4
768.5
9.67
17.53
11.33
12.4
8.9
10.2
2.92
2.36
5.02
49.1
29,4
104,2
392.8
548.5
411.9
3.15
2.80
2.06
18.5
14.7
15.0
22
23
24
3.82
5.78
2.89
69.2
82.3
40,3
681.8
972,1
599.1
5.33
7.57
7,94
U.l
7.9
13.2
2.76
3.67
2,00
39.2
33.1
9.5
865.2
1028,9
665.2
13.65
13.36
17.55
9.5
8.1
12.9
3.00
5.26
2.08
48,4
62,3
43.3
434,0
570,3
407.3
2.05
2.51
3.28
17.1
U.O
18.4
25
26
27
2.57
6.56
3.22
28,5
69.2
51.1
501.2
832.4
746.7
4,85
«.as
8.97
16.0
9.2
10.6
1,76
3.97
1 ,96
7.6
13.6
13.0
687.1
1007.B
825.1
14.02
11.98
19.60
12.6
8.5
10.4
1 .24
3.10
2.64
20.3
30.6
66.1
370.5
605.7
466.3
2.12
2.01
1 .58
21.8
13.4
15.3
28
29
30
3.30
5.37
3.32
35.2
73.9
81,6
582.8
933.5
600.7
5.30
6.21
5.75
n.7
8.3
12.0
2.37
3.41
2.10
8.7
25.3
10.4
718.6
992.9
720,0
13.40
13.28
17.17
12.0
8.5
11.9
1.70
2.80
1.71
23.4
36.9
46,2
394.3
533.9
412.5
1.71
1 .75
2.85
20.3
14.8
18.1
31
32
2.93
6.07
48,9
79,8
530.5
815.0
4.60
6,84
14.4
9.2
1.98
3.97
9.5
17.3
723.9
964.6
13.71
9.97
11.9
8.8
1 .08
2.31
26.9
23.7
396.1
595.0
1 .46
1 .58
20.1
13.9
SUM 3,08 S2.1 594,6 5.31 12,9
BAG 2,83 59.8 689.5 5.99 11.2
1.94 12,7 703,7 13,43 12,2
2.03 18.7 804.6 13.06 10.6
1.70
1.65
29. a
«J.7
U10.9
461 .8
3.54 19.2
3.17 16.5
33
0.94
22,8
242.6
1.41
31.5
0,50
5.5
131,1
0,16
62,8
0,58
3.8
53.2
0,03
145
34
6.62
206,4
1894.2
2.79
4,0
4.46
52.5
1645,6
1,60
5,1
3,00
31.3
1074.6
0,55
7.8
35
3.98
79.7
1118.1
3.61
7.1
1.91
16.6
1020,8
0.80
8.4
1 .24
7.6
550.8
0.52
15.7
36
1.99
67,5
619.2
0.58
12.1
1.04
6,8
763.5
0,79
11.4
0,16
4.7
548.3
0.86
16.0
37
1.74
33,8
357,7
1.02
21.3
1.57
3.3
486.0
4.33
17.9
0.33
6.4
327.4
2.86
26.2
38
1.73
24.2
391.2
2,94
20.4
1.33
4.2
537.6
10.82
16.2
0.34
10.8
306.2
4.47
27.4
39
1.91
30.8
446.2
5,19
17.7
1.14
5.3
594,7
16.79
14,6
0.10
10,9
367,8
5.69
23.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDlF)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
J02
-------
APPE NO I X O.CONT'O
LISTING Of- M(1|)AI. RFSULTS ON INJIIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR
OU<} 1972
MAKE MODL CIO
CHEV VEGA 110
VEH YEAR MAKh MUDl CIO
050 1172 CMtV NOVA 307
VEH YEAH MAKE NODL CIO
051 1 <»7 3 CHEV M0N7 350
mode
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NO*
HPG
HC
CO
C02
NO X
HPG
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
e
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VtH
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
052
1972
CHEV
NOVA
350
053
1972
CHEV
STAM
350
054
1972
CHEV
IMPi
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
ND*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NUX
1
2
3
7.22
5.57
10.27
89,0
66.7
213,7
687.1
746,6
1029.2
6.10
3.46
2.85
10,4
10.2
6.4
4.48
3.45
6.06
89.3
«7.S
169.5
872.4
707 .8
1046,9
10,57
#.13
4.85
8.6
11.2
6.7
6.84
4,97
10.42
19.2
111 .9
1 74,4
866.2
727 ,1
1048,9
4,47
3.19
1.17
a
5
6
3.99
2.37
2.72
77,6
30,3
2«.5
705.5
654,7
494,1
4.24
7.88
6,04
10.6
12.5
16,4
2,48
1,82
1.71
32.9
12.8
16,1
768,8
715,0
522,2
6.02
9,50
5,87
10.7
12.0
16.1
3,81
2.35
2.41
67.5
?4.5
12.9
701 .0
622,2
496. 4
3,56
5.13
2.93
7
8
9
3,06
2.17
2.79
78,8
37.7
25.0
612.8
541 .6
595.3
7,96
8,12
12.94
11.9
14.6
13.9
2.44
2.33
2.39
118.1
31.7
54,9
652.3
602,2
655.4
9.96
8.37
11.62
10.5
13.5
11.8
2.94
2.52
2.38
29.4
64, 1
14.7
676, 5
557.8
626,5
5.70
5.08
2.80
10
1 1
12
3.06
3.04
3.34
21.5
60,5
35.4
561,5
658,4
730.3
8,54
10.13
8.74
1«.7
11.6
11.1
2.22
3.04
2.45
23.5
91.6
28.9
614,9
724 , I
817.0
8,63
10.24
9, 38
13.5
10.1
10.2
2.51
1.1«
4,20
55.2
54,6
94.0
605. 7
6 65.8
7 16.9
6.32
5.73
6.53
13
14
15
3.78
2.78
5.40
84.0
40,4
82. 1
729.3
510.7
488.2
10,33
6.11
3.1 1
10.2
15.2
14.0
3.42
1.80
3.92
94,6
22.3
61.9
770,5
587.3
564.7
1 1.48
7.26
4.10
9.5
l#.l
13.2
4,29
3.33
6,26
78.4
65.8
96. 1
762.8
518.4
543.4
9.67
4. 36
2.47
16
17
18
13.13
3.53
2,86
299.6
"3.2
38,8
1075.4
565.5
653,3
«,37
6.55
4,47
5.6
12.3
12.3
9,00
2.84
1.78
185,4
49.1
27.0
1143.2
657.0
703.8
4,56
9.93
5.76
6.1
U.9
1 1.8
13.65
4.19
4.11
289.1
93.6
65.5
990,7
579.0
566,6
3.21
7.13
4.19
19
20
21
3.60
3.57
4.03
87.8
64.3
199.6
503.6
742.3
604.0
5.51
4,46
4.26
13.6
10.4
9.5
2.16
2.35
3.28
31.8
39.2
155.9
614.8
812.9
700.2
8.54
6.12
7.84
13. V
10.1
9.3
5.90
4.21
1.5b
79,7
70.0
67.2
522.5
766. 1
716.7
6.00
4.68
9.92
22
23
2a
a.47
7.11
2.52
100.1
170.1
44.2
605.5
767.1
592.0
4.41
7,16
1 1 .23
11.«
8.4
13.3
2.76
4.73
2,08
44.7
81.6
45.1
685,3
079,7
669,7
7.24
8,67
9,64
11.6
8.7
11.9
4.80
6,96
2,89
119.2
158,0
46.6
660. 3
854.7
605.9
5.54
6.42
6.69
25
26
27
2.83
8.18
3.39
28.0
109.4
74.2
525,6
726.3
662.3
7.35
5.99
9.98
15.3
9.6
11.2
1,81
5.42
2.53
20.1
84.1
46.2
572.3
775.7
717.3
8.53
6.85
11.37
14.6
9.6
11.1
1.19
9.39
4 ,06
73.4
148.4
73.6
428.8
619.0
679.4
4.50
3.39
7.79
28
29
30
4.1 2
6.41
2.91
53.7
164,2
62,2
529.2
737.2
603.8
5,87
6.68
9.62
14,2
8.7
12.5
2.18
3.89
2,10
26.9
75.9
58.3
607.8
822.3
665.4
7.89
8.07
9,72
13.5
9.3
11.6
5.47
7.11
1,26
91,4
157.7
55.7
535,1
743.3
595.9
1,61
5.47
6.29
31
32
2.81
8.01
39.3
129.3
573,1
682.8
7,82
5.03
13.8
9.7
1.93
4.99
27.2
74.3
645.2
815,2
8.64
6,05
12.8
9.4
1,09
7,18
87. 1
162.2
570.5
741.8
4.58
1.10
MPG
1.3
9.1
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL HE SIJL T S ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
05b
YEAR
1972
HAKE
DATS
MODL
STaw
CIO
97
VEH
056
YEAR
• •
1972
MAKE
DODG
MODL
DART
CID
318
VEH
057
YEAR
1972
MAKE
DODG
MODL
POL A
MODF
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CM
C112
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
1
2
3
U.50
0.70
7.91
26,6
29.a
23.2
370.2
560.2
153.6
9.51
1.12
23.59
20.6
10.3
17.2
0.06
5.00
8,63
39.9
80.5
80.8
007.5
009.9
770 .6
3.23
3.69
2.65
18.1
10.8
9.5
21 .85
17.11
30.55
192. 1
123.8
233.1
760,2
718,0
1030.8
8.27
6.71
5.56
o
5
b
5.79
3,09
2.17
21.8
5.8
2.9
268 ,8
361 . 1
278.7
5,68
7.27
0.90
27.7
23.0
30.5
3.02
2.90
2.02
50. 1
31.5
25.0
190,7
060.2
010,5
0.88
7.69
1.71
15.3
17.1
19.2
13.90
10.17
9.99
109,0
63,2
68.6
605,0
519.2
060.3
7.11
8 .65
6.12
1
8
9
2.87
J. 19
2.56
1 9,2
27.6
11,6
352.2
312.5
322.7
7.30
0.91
9.11
22.7
20.3
25.0
2.91
2.61
2.67
26.7
59.2
32.2
376.6
062.3
050 .8
7.57
5.75
8. 19
20.7
15.7
17.3
9.97
8,53
9.03
66.7
81.6
69.8
509.2
531.1
519.1
9.66
8,21
10.23
1 0
1 I
12
2.29
5.18
3.01
8,1
U2.0
15.n
301 .0
386.6
390.5
5.50
9.95
7.38
27.7
19.2
20.9
2.02
2.87
2.93
20.8
37.5
37.3
080,2
506.9
610.6
6,19
8.16
8.35
16.8
15.0
13.1
12,01
9.16
13.16
79.8
80.5
102.6
511.7
b55.5
671 .6
7.88
1 1 .68
10,31
13
1 o
15
~.13
2.18
~. HO
3«. a
10.9
16. 0
<"02.7
297.0
3?6.8
12.62
5.80
3.19
17,5
27.7
20.2
3,28
2.17
3,56
"1.3
26.3
00.9
562.3
110.1
398.6
8.19
6,80
3. 06
13.9
19.0
18.5
12,09
1 1 .26
21.77
92.0
82.0
112.6
709.5
511.2
099.9
12,66
7.61
1.69
16
1 7
18
12.70
S.3U
2.30
53,6
26,3
7.0
630.0
310.3
006.8
3.68
9,50
5.75
11.8
20.2
20.9
8,97
3.07
2,89
181.1
62.6
35.0
909.8
107.9
525.7
3.OB
0 . 96
5.15
7.0
17.2
15.0
U8.U1
1 1 ,9b
12.01
338.0
128. 3
1 1 1 .6
1019.9
582.1
57 3.5
o ,58
8 . 05
6,63
19
20
?l
3.17
2.79
3,01
16.9
8.5
51.5
309.2
OB5.9
376.6
9,06
10.82
7.73
25.7
17.5
19.0
2.80
3.53
3.30
53,0
oo. a
29.7
36B.0
603.9
511,1
1.67
5.82
5,01
19.3
13.0
15.5
12. b2
16.05
11 .57
133.3
101.0
225.0
500.0
660. 1
b33.8
6.59
7.10
5.30
22
23
21
3,02
5.89
2.05
31,0
32. u
10,3
353.0
uoo. 1
372.0
6.11
9.77
10.52
21.6
17.3
22.5
2.99
1.53
2.60
72.6
05.5
22.0
562 ,8
620.8
062,0
6,95
7.95
7.29
12.9
12.6
17.5
10,62
23,15
9.20
107.5
199.0
90. 3
610,5
795. 7
515.5
7.03
9.51
9.50
25
26
27
1.53
u. 79
2.53
7.5
18.2
18.2
298.0
025.0
390.6
6.12
0,30
12.70
28.2
18.9
20.8
2.23
5.60
3.11
02.5
60.3
50.2
052.0
602.9
516.5
6.06
1,89
6.97
16.9
12.0
10.7
9.8b
29,69
1 0.70
95.6
171.9
118.9
087. 7
661 .5
601 .2
6.07
5.03
10.17
MPG
2fi
?<»
1.72
5.23
6.2
26.7
291 .0
J89.3
5.93 29,0
8.05 19.7
2.69
0.32
55.0
nl.7
«92.2
577 ,0
5.63 lb.I
b.5B IS.5
15.06 118.6
195.8
502.0
70U.1
7.a
9.2
5.9
9.5
8.7
10,0
7.5
8.7
10. J
5.bi 12.1
8.17 8.1
30
1 .95
18.9
371.0
9.23 21.7
2.69
29. 7
196 . 0
7 .06
16.1
9.85
102.5
510.6
9.09
12.1
31
1.61
20.7
317,3
5,27 25,0
2,38
53.7
190.3
6,82
15.2
10,12
108.3
538.1
7.05
12.0
32
0 . 38
20.5
025.1
3.91 18.8
5.50
63,5
590.6
0,70
12.5
30,57
176.3
702.8
6.38
8.2
SUM
1 .96
13.2
301.1
6.71 20.1
2.50
32.3
078.6
6.05
16.5
10,50
120,0
632.2
7.50
10.2
BAG
3. 19
22.3
379.8
7.70 20.9
2.58
03.7
515.5
6,09
15.0
13.17
128.9
625.2
7.«1
10.?
33
0.03
2.9
32.3
0.03 232
0,51
18.3
80,6
0.07
79.9
2.98
25.6
110.6
0.23
55.0
30
6,08
2«.l
617.0
0.55 13,2
5,18
167.2
990 ,6
1 .00
6.8
00,93
561.2
1190,9
1.89
1.0
35
1.31
6.2
619.7
0,91 11,0
2,80
92,0
630 ,8
0.52
11.3
73,96
287.5
705.6
0.8?
6.1
36
1 .36
6. 1
385.6
0.81 22.2
2.02
59.6
501.8
0.02
10.7
06.71
199.3
170.1
0.07
9.5
37
0.09
2.3
311.1
1.60 28,1
1,60
5.2
372,1
2.36
23.0
1 0.98
75.1
1187.0
2.90
6.6
38
0.70
1.8
265.8
5.63 32.8
1.32
0.6
399.1
5.53
21 .b
13.25
29b.b
Olb.8
5.69
9.6
39
0.5?
2.0
306.0
6.59 28.5
1.65
11.2
158.2
9.13
18,5
10.18
91.7
50O.6
8.71
12.8
t MISSII1N RESULTS IN GRAMS PEP MILE (PfR MINUTE FOP IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY In MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOP IDLE)
FUfL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDPOGEN RATIO
¦JUb
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RE9ULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
VEH YEAR HAKE MOOL CID
058 |972 FORD PINT 122
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR HAKE MOOL CID
059 1972 FORD TURI 302
VEH YEAR MAKE HODL CID
060 1972 FURD GALA 351
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
<1,61
a,62
<12.4
22.7
29.8
496.9
531.7
698.0
3.29
2.18
1 .95
15.4
15.3
1 1.6
7,54
6,58
9,90
61,3
31,2
55.5
813.0
808.7
1163.0
7.69
4.54
3.91
9.5
10,1
6.9
7.67
7,04
10.92
179.9
152.4
187.5
687,9
599.7
919.4
1.71
1.02
1.09
8.9
10.3
7.1
4
5
6
3,64
2.44
2,00
15,6
14.9
10.9
429.5
384.5
351.9
2,98
3.68
2.27
19.1
21.9
25.6
3,77
2.26
2.49
28,9
10,0
7.7
641,4
579.1
557.0
3,87
6.41
4,14
12.7
14.7
15.9
4,89
3,98
2.23
146, 1
126.8
93.1
545,1
418.3
387 .6
1,06
1.86
1.12
11.2
H.l
16,4
7
8
9
2.26
1.82
1.75
35.6
33,6
33.9
341.6
374,0
34U.1I
J.59
J.12
3,89
21.9
20.5
22.0
2,26
8.58
5.31
26,1
41.8
25.1
573.8
577.1
543.9
8.07
7.99
8.14
11.3
13.2
14.8
4.53
3,94
4.62
142.7
133.8
1 30,6
458.0
427 .2
422.0
2.76
1.72
3.05
12.7
13.7
13.8
10
1 1
12
1.75
2,38
2.51
16.2
40,1
37.9
390.1
352.2
481 .7
1.20
3,96
1.15
21.1
21.0
16.2
8,56
6,59
10,44
12,6
75.4
46.9
570.0
562,0
717,6
7.49
7,63
9.52
14,4
12.7
10.8
4,45
5,00
5.84
118.8
154,6
165.4
435,8
475,2
533.0
1.89
2,67
2.28
13.9
12.1
10.9
13
11
15
3.02
1.81
2.75
62.3
28.8
16.3
377.7
360.4
418.3
4.36
5.27
2.16
18.5
21.6
19.6
7,35
9.24
12.44
66. 1
59.2
"2.5
649,4
557,8
621 .6
9.45
7.05
3.72
11.«
14.1
12.2
5.70
4.18
6.02
155,3
119,3
139,2
565,3
403 .6
441 .3
3.48
1.82
0,96
10.7
11.7
13.1
16
17
18
6.60
2.96
2.29
21.a
52.5
21.5
928.9
369.3
378.6
3.20
3.88
2.83
9.0
19.2
21.2
31.13
7,66
7.63
110.6
54.0
24.2
1196.4
605.9
591.4
4.81
7.77
4.90
6.0
12.4
13.6
12.17
4.90
4.25
262.6
125.6
123.5
885.6
450.5
496.5
1 .24
2.45
1.41
6.6
13.4
12.6
19
20
21
2.32
2.72
2.«6
27,8
21.2
44,6
364.2
455.0
323.5
4,16
3.54
3,68
21."
17.9
22.1
7,01
8.46
6,66
"5.2
46.0
70.9
530.0
679.3
61 1.1
4,65
4.53
8.78
1«.3
11.4
11.7
5.02
6,00
5.52
156.3
154,5
196.8
H0.3
580.6
518,4
2,07
1 .57
2.67
13.2
10.5
10.5
22
23
2«
2.51
a.25
1.88
41.4
47.0
51.7
446.4
507.3
350.6
3.88
3.89
4.78
17.1
14.9
21.8
15,76
13,95
5,82
58.9
59.4
52.2
674.3
833.4
564.4
9.15
7.97
6.45
10.9
9.1
13.4
5.29
7,88
4.03
141. H
1 79.6
115.1
508.9
667.6
457,2
2.11
1 .96
3.08
1 1 .9
9.1
13.6
25
26
? 7
1.59
3.«3
2.66
21.4
16.8
55.8
361.3
609.6
370.6
1.11
3.52
4.67
22.2
13.7
19.0
10.52
19.45
6.58
30.8
36.5
64,8
545,5
897. 1
626.9
7.28
5.45
9.74
14.2
8.7
11.7
3.96
8.44
4.65
106.8
157.5
1 37. 1
419.4
688.8
544.4
2.22
1 .62
3.32
14.H
9.2
11.5
28
29
30
2.11
3.75
1.91
22.3
32.7
33.0
396.9
481.7
344.6
3.69
3.88
5,03
20.2
16.3
22.1
11 .30
13.78
4.97
26,8
48.1
51 .1
579.3
809,2
588.4
7.83
6.61
6.56
13.5
9.6
13.0
5.03
7.07
4,02
1 05. 3
161,8
128.0
436.5
657 .7
487.6
1.95
1.74
3,30
14.4
9.5
12.7
31
32
1.96
1.1 0
33.0
2«,7
377.7
597.7
3.71
3.56
20.4
13.7
10.96
19.39
39,6
52.5
575.5
853.7
7,86
5.82
13.2
8.9
4,09
8.50
113,1
153.6
4 4 3.5
648.6
2,60
l.flO
14.0
9.7
SUM
BAG
1 .66
1 .63
23.0
34.3
393.4
395. 4
3,83 20.4
3.95 19.5
5.97
9.03
32.2
19.2
581 .1
631 .5
7.50 13.6
6.58 12.0
a.22 123,5
a.71 147.8
464.2
501.6
2.00 13.2
2.28 11.9
33
0,51
6,6
109.0
0,66
73.4
1,09
15,6
94,8
0.10
72.5
1,90
53.2
193.1
0.66
51.4
34
1.55
9,8
997.8
1.11
8.7
10,45
242.7
1076.1
1 .86
6.0
6.88
205,2
1268.3
0,88
5.5
35
1.00
11,0
609.8
1.65
10,7
3.94
77.8
759,6
0.52
9.9
6.00
200.2
959.8
1.57
6.9
36
0.18
2.0
449,8
0.54
19.6
2,6)
50.6
518,2
0,90
14.6
2.59
96,9
566.8
0.46
12.2
37
0.10
1.6
362.2
0.93
21.3
1.35
4.1
422,2
1.07
20.5
1.88
68.8
388.8
0.55
17.6
38
0.10
1.5
298.9
2.55
29.4
2.00
5.7
475.4
4,69
18.2
2.11
68.8
303.2
0.87
21.2
39
0.65
7.6
365.0
5.72
23.1
2.52
6.1
542.8
12.58
15.8
2.91
95.5
336.1
1.80
17.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN CRAMS PER MILE (PER HINUTE POR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FDR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
30b
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES
HOUSTON
VFh rHB HAKE MflDL CID
061 |972 MlRn GRAN 351
VEM YEAR MAKE HODL CID
06? 197? F nRD STAW 000
VEH YEAR MAKE MI10L CIO
063 197? FURD LTDB 029
MODF
NO.
HC
CO
CO?
nox
MPG
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
CO?
NOX
MPG
I
?
3
II
5
6
7
a
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
10
15
16
1 7
18
19
20
?l
2?
? 3
20
25
26
?7
?e
? 9
30
8.20 1?6,9 69?.6 7,13 9.7
5.B8 130.3 753.5 6,98 9.?
9.19 158.3 1083.6 6.20 6.5
3.?6 7b.9
2.09 2H.0
?•1? 15.3
2.81 16.9
?.US 1UI. 1
3.13 37.2
2.95 57.n
3.95 5?.3
3.93 1U0.9
660.6 8.00 11.0
¦>77.9 11. ?8 10,1
080.a 7,18 17.?
608.5 8,?a 13.8
500.1 7,25 11.5
571.0 9,11 13.9
535.5 6.56 10.0
638.7 11.96 l?.l
696.7 7.19 9.5
1,7" 60.3 70(1.1 6.83 10.0
2.58 80.1 533.7 <1.90 13.2
0.76 87,6 596,1 3.15 11.9
10.6H 165.2 1077.9 u.«7 6.3
1.86 78.5 598.6 6.62 12.1
2.85 85.a 633.1 0.93 11.0
3.95 70,5 515.7 a,21 13.9
O.OU 166,2 753,1 5,67 8.6
0.65 58.6 687,9 0.70 11.2
~.16 191.5 602.7
7.62 128,0 82?,5
2.85 39,9 625.0
2.56 113.0 530.9
7.05 120.9 863.7
0.03 61.8 708.0
0.19 86,3 567.3
~.67 96.5 782.3
1.02 57.5 611,6
5.29 9.3
8,?7 8.5
6,20 1?,7
0.19 1?.U
3.98 8.2
5.51 10.8
0.00 12.0
6.16 9.3
0.07 12.5
0.21 06.0 1010.9 13.98 8,1
0.09 27.1 807,8 6,67 9.8
8.12 02.9 1080,7 6,03 5.6
3.09 17.? 739.3 7.97 11.a
2.61 12.2 618.1 11.89 13.7
?.?3 8.5 533,? 7.51 16.0
?,87 0(1.5 650,9 10,10 12.1
2.50 37.7 581.3 8.36 13.7
2.56 31.5 611.6 12.05 13,3
?.39 18.7 620.2 9.30 13.5
2.60 26.1 753,8 12.76 11,1
2.85 21.5 782.9 11.71 10.7
2.77 25.1 838,? 16.00 10.0
1.98 10.2 581,3 9.00 10,7
3.17 27.0 677.9 5.65 12.1
6.83 86,3 1618.0 6,90 5,0
2,67 25,9 685.3 12.06 12.1
2.32 17.6 673.6 9.02 12.5
2,52 23.8 633.0 11.32 13.1
2.83 17.2 803.0 10.03 10.6
2.9a 55.8 709.a 11.00 10,5
2.92 a7.1 7 0 3.9 9.97 10.7
a,15 08.0 1008,3 13.75 8,1
2,00 10,8 607.2 13.70 13.2
1.91 12,5 567.8 9.02 15.0
«.15 60,2 905.8 7.35 8.0
2.40 17.0 739.2 15.76 11.5
2.12 12.8 609.1 8.93 13.1
0.10 36,9 955.9 11.73 8.6
2.16 17.0 665.2 10.13 12.7
5,50 113,0 920,1
5,22 86.6 825.7
8,90 253.6 1200.6
3.50 70.5 735.6
2,50 39.0 631.0
2.38 31,9 526.1
3.00 180.8 623,3
3.92 159.5 561.0
3.05 101,3 599.9
0.01 106.0 582.0
5.98 302,8 578.2
6.06 208.3 703.0
6.05 292.3 708.1
0.30 103.0 520.3
6.0a 109.9 5 79,6
12.76 315.1 1222.5
~.28 107.0 595.9
1.71 71.B 713.6
3.60 90.7 S32.2
o.oi 7U.0 780.9
5.39 276,1 606.8
0.9a 126.0 600,8
7.01 185.3 850.0
2.79 72.6 587.B
3.17 90.1 550.0
7,Oa 132.3 779.6
3.71 121.0 630,7
0.65 95.3 550,5
~.30 166.0 760.fl
2.98 77.0 595.0
8.10 8.0
0.10 9.1
0.91 5.0
8.19 10.3
B. 52 12./
6.20 15.2
5.12 9.6
5.00 10,8
7.02 11,5
5.30 11.7
2.?7 7.8
5.86 8.5
5.00 7.5
0.70 11.6
2.73 11.5
2.77 5.0
6.20 10.6
7.09 10.6
5.50 12.8
1. HI 9,7
0,?9 8,a
5.60 10.3
7.86 7,h
7.30 12.5
5.10 13.0
0.08 8.8
7.57 10.6
0.78 12.3
9.02 8.5
8.02 12.2
31
2.63
152,0
568.3
3,80
10.9
l.'l
15.0
612.8
9.05
13.8
1. 19
96. 3
579.0
5.72
12.0
32
8.2?
191.7
811.0
3.00
7.8
3.62
11.1
968.a
7.02
8.6
7.35
102. 7
787 .7
3. /9
8.6
SUM
2.80
6O.0
598.9
5.76
12.6
2.17
18.5
601.0
9.89
13.1
3.66
121.7
596.0
5.23
1 1 . 1
BAG
3.09
92.6
670.3
5.80
10.7
2.67
20,9
715.6
10.00
11 ,6
0.50
166.1
651.5
5,10
9.6
33
0 .99
00.9
93.2
0.01
53.1
0,09
7.6
180,9
0.02
05.6
1 .75
60.8
188.2
0.82
50.7
3a
8.88
028.6
1296.7
0.90
o.a
5.19
88.0
2170.8
2.09
3.8
9.26
011.5
1073.1
1.37
0.1
35
1 .03
38.2
1200.1
1.36
7.0
2.67
00.0
1096,5
1.56
7.6
6.80
275,2
880.2
2.03
6.7
36
1 .09
36.1
769.7
1.09
10.7
1.70
28.1
711.0
1.00
U.o
1.15
163.3
533.8
0. J7
11.1
37
0.07
0.2
528.3
1.63
16.5
1.08
0.5
080,1
2.19
17.9
2.01
61,8
080 .3
1.90
15.1
38
1.0?
6.3
007,1
5.62
21.1
1.10
0.6
289.9
7.25
29.5
0.96
9.0
50O.2
6.70
17.0
39
1 .51
13.0
527,5
A.05
16,1
1.07
6.1
5lo,a
I 1 .76
16.2
2.19
79. 1
066.3
0.56
10.9
EMISSION PESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL FCONOMY in MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUMt A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
JU7
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR HAKE MODL CIO
064 1972 LINC MRK4 460
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
065 1972 MERC STAm 400
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
066 1972 OLDS DfcLT 350
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02 NO*
MPG
HC
CO
COS NOX
MPG
1
2
J
a
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
21
25
26
27
28
29
6.17 155.1 690.6 12,85 9.3
5.49 52,1 949.2 6.12 8.5
6.58 47,3 1408,8 8,67 5,9
3.78 18,5
2,55 14,0
2,61 10,5
2.49 125.3
4,10 115,4
1.38 46.1
3.81 31.4
7.49 198.1
5.05 87.9
812.9 9.88 10.4
691.2 13.06 12.3
632.8 14,61 13.5
649.3 6.53 10.4
670.2 8.49 10.3
654.8 13.25 12.0
714.9 10.39 11.4
690.5 5.84 8.7
968.5 12.84 7.9
4.62 72.8 824,0 14,33 9,3
2.92 34,2 693.2 9.60 11.7
3.90 22,4 751.4 5.97 11.1
8.82 102.0 1570.3 7,02 5.0
3.64 53.6 755.9 11.50 10,4
3.22 32,5 733.5 9.06 11.2
3.38 47.9 730.7 7.73 10,9
3.98 39.3 903.8 9,56 9.1
5.41 292.6 685.9 6.10 7.6
4,34 122,6 772,0 8.13 9.1
6.16 101,4 1051,7 11.84 7.2
3.23 55.4 704.9 11,43 11.1
2.87 36.7 670.3 8.65 12.0
5.51 52.6 104U.3 8.26 7.8
3.67 60.1 812.5 14,34 9,7
4,«6 136,4 871,7 14,17 8,1
4.69 73.4 801,7 10,71 9.5
10,12 201,7 1129.6 6,35 6.0
3.77 82.2 596.7 7.47 12.0
2.29 30.2 535,4 10.96 15.0
2.24 12.8 528.5 10.27 16.0
1.84 33.8 550.7 9,89 14.6
2.13 54.4 595.1 11.08 12,9
1.89 30.7 524.6 11.09 15.3
2.59 36.6 597,8 10,73 13,4
2.45 70.3 620.3 13.52 12,0
2.81 33,3 800.4 17.72 10,3
2.60 64,0 722,6 18,38 10.7
2.05 22.0 586,6 13.33 14.1
3.61 71,3 496,5 7.35 14.3
9.82 301.0 1184,9 7.78 5.3
3, 12 101.7 615.3 13.42 U.3
2.72 Jl.i 628,0 12,44 12.9
2.82 94,2 532.6 10.32 12.9
3.42 44,4 776.0 15,60 10.U
2.67 123.8 665.3 12.27 10.2
4.92 57.5 722.9 7.70 10,7
6.34 95.2 708.7 6.34 10.1
11.59 122.3 1079.2 5.24 6.8
4.89 74,5 612.9 7.88 11.9
3.23 40.6 589.4 10,99 13,4
2.92 32.4 481.9 6.91 16.4
4.39 58.1 593.7 7,79 |2,7
3.32 86.4 540.4 8.61 12.9
3.93 47.2 584.1 11.65 13.2
3,67 40.0 554.2 9,40 |4,1
4.63 112.4 652.1 8.53 in.5
4.69 77,0 712,1 11,81 10,5
5,30 92.8 731.5 11.61 9.9
3.52 67,6 526.7 8.32 13.8
6.05 102,0 493.3 3.35 13.2
13.81 277.0 1022.3 3.68 5.9
4,50 86,6 593.0 9.|7 11.9
4.16 75.0 624.4 8.40 11.7
3.00
5.05
40.6
77.0
649,9 8,01 12.3
992.2 11.76 7.9
2.94 57,2
4.42 146.2
2.03 40.7
2.09 25.5
5.73 119.3
2.57 60.3
2,73 39,9
4,32 159.9
715.2 13.01 10,9
830.6 10.92 6,3
558.9 14.39 14,1
601,2 14,35 13,7
650.6 10.13 8.4
644.7 19.19 11.9
649,6 13.57 12,3
735.0 9.90 8.9
4.38 76,6
5.57 121.1
5,66 150.4
5.21 138.3
8.77 147,2
3.91 92,9
3,47 60.1
9.43 153.9
4,64 163,8
4.95 59.6
8,11 127,8
539.1 8.23 13.2
707.8 7.82 9.7
625.0 S,06 10,1
666.9 8,17 9.9
835.4 10.81 8,1
596.5 8.99 11,8
535.2 V.82 13.9
728.7 6.16 8.9
890.0 10.J3 7.6
383.8
993.6
8.47 18,0
10.26 7.3
30
3.17
59,9
702.4
9.98
11.0
2.01
01.5
552,6
13.27
14.1
5.70
80,4
796.0
8.92
9.5
31
2.73
63.0
740.8
9.91
10.5
2.36
<16,8
636,9
14.27
12.«
3,78
101.0
386.7
8.21
15.9
32
5.71
80.3
1021.8
8,05
7.6
5.58
118.9
860,9
8.47
8,3
10.38
155,4
568.6
6.57
10.5
SUH
5.13
54.7
712,7
9.23
1 1.0
2.32
51.3
576,2
11.11
13.4
3.87
69.7
577.2
7.94
12.7
BAG
3.65
88.9
800, 1
9.14
9.3
2.23
59.8
666.2
12.57
11.6
3,44
46.1
669.2
9.16
11.8
33
0.58
6.7
122.8
0.12
64,2
1,46
33.6
140,0
2.92
45,0
1 .81
15.1
103. U
0.1 1
66,8
31
5.00
79,6
1889,1
1.65
4.4
9.13
434.9
1528,0
2.15
4.0
10.98
202. 1
1643.1
6.86
4.4
35
2.09
28.8
977.5
0.93
8 . 6
5.«2
224,9
851,2
3.98
7.3
5.73
68.1
644.7
0.52
U.5
36
1.10
8.9
733.3
1.17
1 1 .8
3.16
157,2
476,8
0.50
12.1
3.07
63,6
490.6
0.61
14.8
37
0.96
«.5
495.7
3.09
17.5
1.10
25,6
536,6
2.2 0
15.3
2.27
36.2
356.0
1.19
21.1
38
1.60
13.0
592.2
7.15
14.4
0.98
19.3
323.9
6.48
24.8
1 .76
19.7
432.1
6.48
18.9
39
2.1"
26.9
660.2
11.55
12.5
1,10
18,5
419,3
10.03
19.6
1 .98
32.6
525.6
9,98
15.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN grams PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
30ti
-------
APPINDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLE9
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CIO
067 1072 OLDS ST Ah 055
VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CID
068 1972 OPEL STAH 116
VEH YEAR MAKt MOOL CID
069 1972 PLYM VALI 225
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
MC
CO
C02
NOX MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
to
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
20
25
26
27
28
29
5.35 53.5 851.8
4.24 11.2 917.8
7,56 22,2 10J9.6
3.21 19.3 840.3
1.96 12,1 750.2
1.63 6.2 6H5.7
1.12 169.2 702.0
2.62 71.1 670.8
2.93 55,6 7 JO.3
2.56 20,9 738.1
a.00 128.0 820.5
3.31 37.3 935.7
9.3a 9.3
3.75 9.3
<1.03 5.9
5.32 10.1
7,35 11.a
4.06 13.4
3.80 9.0
5.97 11,2
8.98 10.7
6.75 U.4
8.Oil 8.6
8.86 8.8
a.56 104,8 905.8 7.57 7.7
2.15 39.1 689,7 6.38 11.7
3.98 25.1 1278.3 3.33 6.7
8.29 10,8 1576.2 i.88 5.3
2.89 26.J 830.4 8.82 10.1
2.18 10.0 821,9 6,08 10,5
2.19 28.8 737.1 7.56 11.2
2,63 19,9 975.1 6,83 8,7
5,21 263,5 797,1 1.25 7.2
1.06 107.5 816.8 6,27 8.6
5.31 51,0 1127.5 9,12 7.2
2.17 19,5 796,5 9,27 10,1
2,10 19,8 711.1 5.12 11,8
5.12 30,1 1050.1 5.73 8.0
3.10 72,1 819.0 10,00 9.1
3.16 82.5
3.10 31.1
5.32 17.2
2.46 11,9
1.84 19,6
1.57 50.4
1.84 34.1
2.77 108,0
2.32 38,1
2,08 38.4
2.94 73,0
2.73 69,9
3.36 66,3
2.07 58,2
2.57 05.8
5.92 121.6
2.10 49.4
2.02 32,7
2.11 51.0
2.78 55.5
2.90 59,0
2.71 73.0
3,60 85.9
2.21 60.2
1.91 58.S
3.42 74.8
2.19 88.1
2.94
4,64
17.5 778.9
23.6 1052.6
6,58 10,9
9.16 8.0
1.95
2.87
12.8
78.5
529.0
190. 1
654.6
491.9
449.9
139.8
177.1
171.5
420.1
401.0
456.2
487.5
506.3
359.8
380.9
760.6
391 .6
447,8
370.1
502.7
488.2
118,1
510.1
390.2
171.8
522.5
145,0
101,8
191.7
3.81 13.1
1.50 16.0
2.65 11.9
4.69 15.7
5.09 18.2
2.55 20,9
1.68 20,1
2.91 16.1
4,ei 18,2
4.18 19,0
4.89 15.1
4.50 14,6
5.87 14,3
3.40 19.0
2.07 19.3
2.54 9.1
5.54 18,7
1.49 17.6
3.51 19.2
1.17 14,8
6.21 15.0
4.12 15.5
5.18 12,9
1.51 18.0
2.78 18.9
2.15 11.6
1.76 15.0
2.95 18,6
5.00 14.2
4,56 99,4
5.25 119.4
7,16 116,0
3.53 84.0
2.63 57,3
2,07 26.8
519.8
425.9
714.1
5.09 12,5
2.29 14,1
2.17 9.1
436.7 1.80 15,3
428.0 6.88 16.9
372.1 5.59 21.1
2,71
2.13
2.50
91.0
08.0
59.8
2.16 18.2
4,09 152.8
1.11 62.9
4,09 164,6
2.21 08.1
3.16 31.9
7.87 93.8
3.62 144.0
2.82 61.2
2.92 88.1
1.23 64,9
1.39 140.1
2.95 75.2
5.40 97.5
2.83 106.5
2,21 54,6
1.88 08,6
3,27 137.1
446.8
018.2
026.B
412.1
408.5
511.5
083.0
385,8
378.7
788.6
005.7
403.1
365.7
077.1
020.3
6,90 14,8
6,72 17.7
B.80 16.8
7.11 18,5
4,11 12,6
8.09 10,1
4.60 11.8
6.21 18,9
«,21 ?n,2
4.77 9,2
1,05 13.B
4.08 17,1
1.75 17.3
5.22 15.1
1,67 13,6
072,6 6,80 14,8
566.6 6.13 12.0
199.3 5,S3 15.4
168,8 4.9b 19.2
518.2 5,04 14.5
052.0 5.00 13,1
1.00
0.45
53.6
72.7
390.0
556.3
5.00 18.2
7.OS 11.0
10
2.87
87.7
771.6
7.17
9.7
1.88
54.7
188,6
1.60
18,5
2.91
123.1
409.8
0.77 14.5
11
2.51
62,7
755.8
6.77
10,1
1,48
70,3
190,1
2.99
17,6
2.46
72.2
190.0
5.09 17.3
12
5.60
58.9
1045.9
5.65
7.7
4.11
76.5
490,0
2.29
14.1
5.13
67.4
518.5
5.29 13.9
SUM
2.11
42.7
778.1
6.67
10.4
1 ,64
37.5
011.1
4.08
17,8
2.68
66.9
412.7
6.10 16.9
BAG
2.82
76,1
874.2
7.19
8.8
2.21
71,0
441,9
1,94
15,8
2.80
95.1
442,1
5,38 10.8
11
0.45
1.0
144.7
0.07
60.1
0.19
5,2
67.2
0.00
116
1,09
17.3
57.5
0.04 100
14
4.40
15.2
1715.9
0.81
5.0
1.83
47.1
951,2
0.55
8.6
8,73
214.4
1272.8
8.57 5.3
15
2.01
7,4
864.1
0.42
10.1
0.81
20.0
662,1
0.91
12.1
1.20
50.8
007,0
0.52 lb.5
16
1.21
6.8
787.4
0.69
11.1
0.52
10.3
501.9
1.10
17.1
2.46
40,0
151.5
1.24 20.7
17
0.91
5,1
598,1
1,77
10,6
O.oi
4.4
374,5
1 ,96
23.2
1,65
20.2
100,2
3,02 2b,0
18
0.50
4.0
642,1
4.21
13.7
0.05
5.2
384,8
1.45
22.5
1.50
22.7
320.2
5.55 24.6
19
0.70
4,9
706.6
9.54
12.1
0.45
3.2
432.1
5.92
20.2
1.50
10.7
007,1
10,08 19,1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
J09
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEH YEAH
mm» ••••
070 1972
MAKE MIJDL CIO
PL YM SATE 318
HOUSTON
VEH YEAR MAKE MOOL CID
071 1972 PONT VENT J50
VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CID
•••• •••• •••
072 1972 PONT BONN 455
MODf
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
5,10
5.42
10.19
126.0
63,7
206.9
722.2
603.9
991.5
B.39
4.08
4.75
9.5
12.3
6.6
8.50
8.36
1 3.94
89.6
90.5
116.0
796,4
591,7
897.0
10.56
6,69
5.07
«.2
11.7
7.9
J.07
1 .04
1.20
89.9
33.3
135.6
802.0
703.7
1000.0
13.13
4.64
6.01
8,9
11.1
7.3
4
5
6
4.53
2.89
2.42
68,7
22.9
9.2
627.5
566.1
400.5
6.39
7.32
J.90
11.8
14.5
21.0
4.36
3.33
2.94
90.3
29.9
20.1
715,9
612.1
508.1
5.11
12.01
6.74
10.2
13.3
16.2
2.94
3.75
1.63
46.5
10.7
6.0
710,7
654.6
593.5
1 1.09
13.73
6.18
11.2
12.9
14.6
7
8
9
3.71
2.66
2.88
51.1
25.4
25.6
631.4
440.3
567.0
9.32
5.60
9,28
12.3
18,2
14.4
3.08
3,10
3,16
22.3
93.7
32.6
632.8
599.6
630.6
11.22
8.85
15.50
13.1
11.7
12.8
4.66
2.73
4.94
33.5
16.9
U.l
727.6
738.9
689.9
16.68
9.98
17.82
11.2
11.5
12.J
10
1 1
12
2.65
3.34
3.40
16.7
51.2
21.6
453.8
- 654.6
620.9
5.22
10.56
7.78
18.2
11.9
13.3
2.92
3,82
3.65
18.9
45.1
44.6
588.3
712.1
769.1
9.68
13.08
11 .53
14.1
11.2
10.4
2,76
5.42
3.56
7.6
30.1
12.3
709,0
775.3
921.8
10.16
19.58
1 3.09
12.2
10,6
9.3
13
lo
15
4.08
2.55
4,66
70,8
21.6
62,4
639.7
059,0
477.9
10.14
5.60
3.39
11.6
17.7
15.0
3.76
2.45
5.48
42,4
20.1
56.6
817.8
555.1
534,8
15,27
8,61
S.04
9.9
14.9
13.8
5.71
3.32
1 .65
25.9
7.4
21.6
846.5
686.0
681.4
20.68
12.13
6.54
9.8
12.5
12.3
16
17
18
11,71
4,09
3.IT
271,5
100,0
28.7
942,0
533.3
537.3
3,24
7.19
5.14
6,3
12.6
15.0
13.02
4.11
3.60
157,0
75.0
39.0
1078,9
654,2
6U0.6
5.22
11.01
9.79
6.5
11.3
12.4
1.51
4.00
2.90
114.5
59.6
13.0
1182.8
671.6
734.5
7,38
14.73
10.81
6.5
11.4
11.6
19
20
21
3.79
4.05
3,96
86,8
40,7
104,5
464.3
616.6
636.0
6.60
6.01
8.03
14.5
12.8
10.9
3.64
4.28
4.36
60.0
"2,5
37.9
594.3
718,0
717,5
8.43
9,87
10.47
12.7
11.1
11.2
2.90
3.U
4.17
38.2
20.2
74.0
614.5
863.5
785.2
10.77
11.67
15.20
13.0
9.8
9.7
22
23
2a
3. 48
5.81
2.90
38.6
121.3
39.4
550.4
727.7
540.1
6.91
8.39
8.42
14.3
9.5
14.5
4.22
7.53
3.09
79.6
79.7
36. 1
703,9
836,0
649.9
11.39
9.72
10.42
10.5
9.0
12.4
3.23
3.98
4,89
29.7
98,7
14,3
808.5
898.8
717.3
11.91
15.00
17.68
10. J
8.3
11.7
25
26
27
2.49
6.81
3.61
20,9
99.1
65.1
955.3
657.7
608.8
5.50
3.87
9.57
17.9
10,6
12.3
2.54
1 0.82
3.79
18.2
75.9
50.2
561.5
771,4
707.4
8.72
7.76
16.1 1
iu.e
9.6
11.1
2.93
2.21
5.07
10.2
38.2
33.1
660.0
914.2
815. 1
10.72
8.82
18.40
13.0
9.0
10,0
28
29
30
4.02
6.64
3.42
44.1
143,3
59.3
461.9
649.9
550, 1
4.72
8.43
8.95
16.3
9.9
13.6
3,98
7.42
3.23
24,8
91.4
36.1
616,4
798.6
664.7
9,02
8.47
15,56
13,3
9,2
12.1
2.74
3.31
4.75
10.2
104,3
18,7
686.9
867,4
743.6
10.15
12.56
17.19
12.4
8.5
11.1
31
32
2.75
T .61
26.5
110.4
aS4.8
637.9
6.18
4.09
16.6
10,6
2.99
9.20
33.9
79.9
598.7
745.2
0.25
6.68
13.4
9.9
3.23
2.01
10.7
U1 .8
709.0
894.9
11.79
8,09
12.1
9.2
SUM
RAG
3,00 43.0 523.0 6.80 14.6
J.12 55.a sea.9 7.0! 13.0
3.39 38,6 622.8 10,21 12,8
1,02 16.0 707,3 10,78 11.2
2,99 21.9 719.6 12.35 11.6
3.70 27,6 818,4 13.17 10,2
33
1.15
36.1
81.6
0,08
61 . 1
1.77
42.5
70.1
0.02
62.3
1 .04
19.3
95.0
0.03
68.9
34
10,24
366,7
1407,8
6,10
0,0
15,05
4J7.7
968,1
0,21
5.2
13.19
211.1
1 150.3
0.42
5.8
35
4.38
166.0
609.4
0.49
10.0
6,00
187.3
603.5
0.21
9.7
5.74
81 .6
720.2
0.52
10.2
36
2.77
86. 1
533.4
0,64
13.1
3.TO
105,2
528,9
0.O2
12.6
2.63
15.2
619.6
I.OO
13.6
37
2.25
19.0
383,0
2.84
21.1
2.13
9.0
47 3.7
4.31
17.9
1.56
6.7
562.7
3.48
15.3
38
1.29
6.8
008,4
4,02
21.0
1.84
8,0
508,3
6.59
16.9
1.23
4.8
602.1
8,59
14.5
39
1.51
8.8
477.6
8,94
17.9
1.75
7.5
580,9
12.79
14.8
1.38
6.3
693.1
15.20
12.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GHAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A ljl,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
J10
-------
APPENDIX 0.CONT'D
LISTING OF MQOAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VFH YEAR
073 1972
MAKE MODL CID
TOVO CARI 07
VEH TEAR MAKE MOOL CIO
07a 1972 VOLK SEDA 97
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
075 1972 VIILK SEDA 97
MODE
HO.
1
2
5
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
11
14
15
HC
CO
19
20
21
22
21
24
25
26
27
28
29
10
6.19 U7.1
5,Bfl uo.l
«,07 61.8
4.13 11.2
1.19 46.4
1.04 29.6
~.65 76,7
1.17 59,a
1.27 53.4
1.26 18,1
1.56 107.1
~.lh 62.3
5.20 121,9
1.52 51.2
5,65 70.6
16 11.12 169.6
17 0.64 89,1
18 u.57 50,8
~.21 79.5
5.12 58,6
4.38 116,0
<1.75 65,7
~.61 85.7
1.99 85.8
1.55 4 3.5
7.88 94.9
4,71 108.0
1.02 57.9
6.75 90.6
a.17 98.0
31 3.76 60.6
32 7.70 105.1
C02
336.5
092.5
530.0
390.2
368.3
165.7
380,3
367.6
358.6
363.9
166.1
059.5
"17.0
315.5
325.0
573. I
300.2
398.2
278.1
029.8
358.9
018.9
190.0
120.0
153.9
051.7
365.2
368.2
366.3
137.1
365.7
027.7
NO*
MPG
1.50 20.6
5.57 15.5
4.11 13.6
6.17 19.4
6.22 19.6
6.62 21,0
7,37 17,3
5.71 18.8
7.90 19.6
6.60 20,4
5.11 16.2
7.69 15.5
5,26 14.2
5.06 20.2
3.30 19.5
3.18 10.1
4.05 19.5
0, 18 17,8
4.59 21.3
4.03 16,5
4.70 16.0
5.09 16.5
4.96 16.1
4.12 18.8
4,68 20.5
3.55 14.2
4.51 16.1
4.63 18.8
3.90 16.7
4,22 17.6
4.56 18.5
3.34 14.4
HC
0.50
0. J1
10.31
3.76
2.23
1,76
2.15
1.81
1.71
1,62
3.18
2.80
1.52
2.21
2.90
7.10
3.61
2.74
3.00
3.21
3.50
1.20
4.79
1,04
2.25
4.10
3.30
2.35
4.38
3.14
3.76
5.53
CO
¦ ¦¦••
43.6
17.1
57.2
37.4
17.9
20.7
25.5
18.3
25.9
31.8
47.6
06.8
52.0
34,8
32.8
93.9
40.9
36.0
29.7
40.1
43.5
48.2
48,2
25.4
50.5
55.1
39.8
28.2
35.5
15.7
35.0
46.3
C02 NO*
408.5
175.1
573.7
160.1
326.8
322.6
321 .2
314.2
299.1
103.7
389.6
416.1
425.2
289.4
315.9
MPG
4.62 18,1
4.19 19,9
3.69 12,7
5,16 20,6
7.59 24.5
5,62 24,b
7.56 20.1
0,70 21.«
7.29 2S.7
5.22 24,7
8,80 18.7
7.25 17.8
9.97 17,0
0.81 25.3
3.02 23.7
631 .7 0.56 u.l
357.6 8,66 20.5
393.0 5,90 19,4
308,9 6.93 24,1
462.5 6.84 16.6
367.2 8.93 19,9
160.1 5.16 19.9
471.7 7.91 15.8
405.5 11.24 19.5
288.7 1.80 23.7
417.4 4.17 17.2
181.2 10.16 19.5
122.8 4.81 21.7
470.9 9,11 16,4
417,4 12.04 17.6
344,3
407,6
5.46 21.6
4.84 16,5
HC
6.71
4,07
8.27
4,00
2.47
2.24
2.32
2.52
2.09
2.24
3.09
2,78
3.70
2.55
4.25
1 1 .86
4,42
3,00
4.28
3.74
3.49
3.76
6.75
2.61
2.12
5.99
3.33
2.93
5.85
2.70
2.26
7 ,45
CO
58.6
38.8
58.4
37.7
19.2
21,2
24.4
39.5
26.2
32.4
46.6
oo,5
53.7
30.9
34.7
97.4
43.1
36.8
30.6
41.7
"2.5
48.0
45.5
21.5
55.1
65.0
17.5
26.5
11 .4
10.0
28.5
40.1
cm
498.6
179. 1
563.4
354.0
132.1
299.0
131.5
288.8
320.7
301 .2
196.6
014.9
449,9
281 .9
310.9
658.9
371 .6
302.7
390.7
017.9
388.0
353.7
509.1
410.2
287.1
417.0
406.9
287 .4
491.9
022.1
342.2
438.5
NO*
HPk
4.89 14.5
3.25 19,6
2.45 11.0
3.47 20.8
6.29 20.0
1.33 26.2
7.05 21.5
5.11 24.7
7.99 20,1
4.97 24.7
9,03 18,5
6.15 18.0
9.09 lh.i
o.ll 25.7
2.52 21,2
1.38 10,4
7.81 19.6
3.94 21.6
6.00 19.6
0.03 17.9
7.20 19,1
5.96 20.1
5,69 I l|. 7
6.90 19,5
4.10 23.3
3.07 16.5
8.77 17.2
4.10 2b.2
6.03 15.9
8.89 18.6
4.00 22.5
3.24 16.9
SUM
3,66
52.0
362.1
5.69
19,5
2.22
26.7
354.2
6.96 22,0
2.77
41.9
3SJ.4
5.69 20.7
BAR
4 , 08
60.1
377.5
a ,9a
18.3
2.90
00.6
382.2
7.00 19,5
3.23
41 . 1
355.2
5.87 20,6
33
0.56
1.9
32.0
0,00
241
0,18
3.1
eo.e
0,01 102
1.15
14.1
79.9
0.80 84.0
34
7.40
17.3
1005.5
0.41
8.0
2.08
04. J
982,8
0.55 8.4
5,65
194 .0
657.2
0.67 9.1
35
4.94
37.9
439.5
1.03
17.2
1 .54
35.0
631 .8
0.28 12.8
5.51
206.2
489.5
1.24 10.7
16
3.81
35,9
330,7
0,69
22.2
1.10
29,7
384,4
0.77 20.4
2.97
108.8
319.7
0.J7 17.7
37
2,19
7,7
304,9
3.30
27.4
0.80
4.2
284,0
2.76 30.3
2.13
81.2
216. 1
0.66 24,0
38
2,00
8.7
321.4
6.88
26.0
1 . 16
9.7
333.9
7.79 25.2
1.63
40. 1
266.2
2.91 2h,5
39
2.56
25.2
359.1
8.45
21.8
1 .06
10.6
304.1
8.54 27,4
1.31
17.5
141.1
7.77 21,8
MISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A ltl.85 CARBON TO HYOROGEN RATIO
JU
-------
APPENDIX D
LISTING OF
MODAL
RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DFTRUIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
- - -
- - - -
- - - ¦
- - - -
- - -
mmm
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - -
mmm
mmmm
mmmm
mmmm
mmm
001
197a
BUIC
ELEC
455
00?
1974
CHEV
MONT
400
003
1974
CHEV
I M P 4
350
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
mPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
2
3
5,87
4.51
7,56
107.6
65.5
76,9
871.8
970,8
1550.2
2.79
1.88
3.01
8.1
8.2
5,2
2.22
2.09
3,«1
29.S
J2.0
47.1
647,4
848,7
1279,3
1,29
2.23
3,01
12.7
9.8
6.5
4,89
4.29
6,50
75.7
34.1
33,4
683,7
930.0
1003,1
3.97
5.74
6.J9
10.8
6.9
0.2
« ,
5
6
3.37
2.«5
1.75
37.3
112,5
18.3
780,6
711.1
660.6
2.23
2.73
2.18
10.4
11.3
12.7
1 .31
0.97
0.85
20.8
16,0
11.5
687,6
595,0
507.6
2.57
3.72
I ,96
12.3
14.2
15.6
2,33
1 .56
1 .90
14.2
24.4
11.1
733.0
608.6
600.7
4.45
5,05
4.35
1 1.6
13.6
14.2
7
4.18
226,3
698.0
2.49
8.3
1 .49
75.2
611.1
3.06
12.1
2.76
112.8
64S.4
3.98
10.7
8
2.99
83,5
706.5
3.59
10.5
1 .06
47.1
569,1
2.35
13.7
2.01
45.5
654.4
4,45
12.1
9
3.40
165.2
663.1
2,84
9.5
1 .02
26.8
580.0
4.10
14.2
2.00
75,3
625.6
4.59
11.8
10
3,30
62. 1
771 .0
J."»7
10.1
1 .03
18.9
643.1
2.79
13.1
2.87
29.4
729.8
5.13
11.3
1 1
3.97
264, 1
739.7
2.35
7.6
1.49
66.2
661.3
3,99
11.5
3,24
147.5
70 <1.2
3.44
9.4
12
3.94
89,9
969.6
4.81
7.9
1.30
41.6
785,1
3.48
10.4
3.31
55,6
902.0
5.92
8.9
13
4.06
213,8
922.4
2.98
7,0
1.83
103.2
729,8
0.05
9.9
3.27
155.8
802.9
4.04
8.4
14
$.1"
60,9
745.0
3.B6
10.4
1.03
35.7
592.7
2.58
13,6
2.24
46.7
666.6
3.66
11.9
15
2.43
35.4
810.0
2.18
10.1
1.42
23.0
738.2
1 .74
11.4
0,18
28,0
733,0
2,80
11.2
16
6,26
60,2
1785,1
4,02
4.7
1.12
37.5
1587,3
2.85
5.4
7,66
85.0
1586.1
3.33
5.1
17"
2.20
97,9
769.1
2.74
9.5
1.29
50,9
674,4
0.23
11.7
2.19
00,4
639.7
0.57
11.5
18
2.10
12.2
855.0
2.64
9.6
1.02
22,6
669,5
2.08
12.5
1 .90
51.6
742.8
0.07
10.7
19
2.12
75.7
715.4
2.64
10,6
0.94
30.8
655,1
3.62
12.6
1 .98
38.9
643.6
4.57
12.5
20
2.63
48.4
1014.7
3.06
8.1
1.19
24.3
810.2
2.85
10.4
2.08
65.0
817.7
4.64
9.6
21
4. 36
270,5
780.4
2.43
7.3
1,9a
102.8
672.5
3.11
9.8
12.37
238,2
765.9
3.26
7.5
22
J.53
133,8
102b.4
3,88
7.1
1 ,b5
63,6
756,8
2.79
10,3
6.87
106.3
905.1
3.71
8.1
23
1.15
96.5
1177.9
3,99
6.6
2.22
53.2
1026,0
0.38
7.9
6,02
104,6
1112.0
5.07
6.8
24
2.61
115,1
693,6
2.19
10,1
0,96
31.8
588,4
3.88
13.8
2.05
83,0
671 .1
4.24
1 1.0
25
2.20
75.4
740.6
3.70
10,2
0.84
22.0
598,7
2.79
13.9
1.19
09.9
687.8
3.65
11.5
26
4,06
64,4
1185,3
3.03
6.8
2.07
25.0
1057,3
2.83
8.0
2.25
63.3
1119.1
3,49
7.2
27
2.BJ
128. 7
828.1
2.56
8.5
1.31
54,e
684. 1
4,30
1 1 .5
2.21
131,6
702.2
3.36
9.3
20
2.04
58.0
814.0
3,96
9.7
0,9 J
25,3
696,4
2.97
12.0
1 .09
56,7
790.5
3.91
10.0
29
3.09
62.8
1103.2
3.93
7.3
1 .50
30.9
975,9
0.43
8.6
1 ,84
76,4
1005,7
4.95
7.8
30
3.20
220.2
705,9
1.72
8.4
1.03
50,9
621.8
3.91
12.6
1.36
85,5
652.1
3.47
11.2
31
3.04
134.5
717.9
3.36
9,5
1,10
35,3
597.3
2.59
13.5
1.17
67.8
689,0
2.99
11.1
32
4,59
113.3
1159,7
3.02
6,6
2.40
38,3
1026.9
2,70
8.1
2.15
65,9
1055.3
2.92
7.6
SUM
2.21
74.8
673.4
3,02
11.1
0.93
31.9
651,8
3.11
12,6
2,01 53.0
707,0
4.12
11.1
RAG
1.77
83.7
578,8
2.35
12.4
1.08
52.6
698,8
3.61
11.3
2.71
02.1
770.9
4.55
9.7
33
0.43
1.7
101.8
0,22
83.8
0,30
4.5
126,0
0.20
66,3
0.02
1.6
122.4
0.22
70,3
34
3.40
28,0
1293,6
2.U
6,6
2.71
30,6
1505.1
1.84
5.7
4,20
9.0
1449,3
2.03
6.0
35
1.76
8.5
759.8
1 .48
11.0
1.13
22.1
811.6
0.84
to.o
1.68
0.3
801 .5
0.91
10.9
36
1.25
4.5
497,6
1.14
17.5
0.50
17.8
704.1
1.04
12.1
0,84
3.3
689.2
0.92
12.7
37
0,84
2.6
006.3
0,54
21.5
0.43
11.4
505.3
0.60
15.7
0,73
2.5
501.6
1.87
17.5
38
0.64
2.3
385,8
1.89
22.7
0.31
6.0
545.1
1.93
16.0
0,44
5.5
550.1
3.87
15.8
39
0.45
b. 1
461.2
4.68
18.8
0,19
6.3
563,5
0.26
15.5
0.15
13.6
673,4
5,65
12,8
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
11 5
-------
A PPE NO IX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
V£H YEAR make MODL CID
000 I'm DODG DART 318
VEH YEAR make MODL CID
005 1970 FORD TORI 302
VEH YEAR make MOOL CID
00b 1970 FORD LTD 351
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MP(j
1
2
3
o
s
6
7
e
9
10
1 1
12
13
lo
15
19
20
21
22
23
20
25
2b
27
28
29
30
31
32
0.12 87.6 U30.il
a.75 71.5 692.6
7.90 160,0 916.8
2.20 15,2
2.91 10.8
2.06 7.0
3.39 61.3 516,3 1.09 10.2
2.52 20.0 at>o,l 1,09 17,a
2.57 18.0 083.8 2.70 17,1
2.65 32.7 072.6 3.95 16,7
2.36 21,5 535.6 3.77 15.0
2,73 25,1 500.J J.79 16.1
3,07 23,0 575.2 3,50 10.3
3.01 07,5 530.0 o.5o lo.a
3.90 32,0 695.0 5.00 11.7
3.73 07,7
2.82 20,5
0.70 61,6
16 1 1 .63 263.1
17 3.90 77,1
18 3.29 37.6
0,08 81.5
0. 33 09.3
3.77 70.5
0.02 03.8
6.56 97,3
2.93 31,0
2.90 22,3
6.69 70,5
3.05 51.7
3.71 36.0
6.10 110,7
3.12 05.6
608.0 5.96 12.1
500.0 3.32 16.2
500.6 2.09 13.6
1058.0 2,99 5.8
537.3 3.55 13.2
570.7 2.70 13.9
085.2 2,05 10,1
667.7 2,90 11.7
610.0 6.08 12.1
613.0
813.3
098.1
096.a
760.2
571.8
559,1
713.5
516.9
a.30 12.8
0.17 9,0
0.52 16.0
3.00 16.0
3.16 9.8
a.52 13.0
3.88 10.1
2.97 9.8
4.13 10.8
2.95
6.07
36.6
99.9
507.5 2.69 15.5
730,3 2.53 9.8
6.05 125,6 079,2
5.20 62.2 726.6
9.58 188.2 919.5
3.75 58.1 586.2
2,30 16,7 062,6
2.01 11.6 513.9
3.01 59.6 561.1
2.71 00.7 532.5
3.01 02.0 5M ,6
3.26 27,7 608.1
0.19 108.2 567.0
0.32 56.2 718.1
0.93 119.1 651.7
3.10 03,9 533.3
5.50 08,9 580,0
12.66 175.7 1082.7
0.16 103.9 500.0
3.28 07.2 609.1
3,56 62.2 531.8
0.00 51.0 715.8
0.32 119.0 635.5
~.22 61.5
8.27 113.0
2.79 31.6
2.50 21.7
7.13 52.9
3.70 78.0
3.82 39.6
~.57 99,2
2.90 36.3
676,0
878,8
569,5
2.68
7.52
33.6
66,6
508.2
832,7
5,4b 12,7
0.53 10.6
5.12 7.1
5.02 12.9
6.15 17.9
3.71 16.5
5.83 13.0
0.77 10.7
6.27 11.7
5,58 13,0
6.38 11,8
7.03 10.8
6.75 10.0
5.09 ia.5
3.57 13,1
0.66 6.3
0,62 12.0
1.19 12.8
0.78 13,9
5.18 10.9
7.60 10,6
7,31 11,3
8.10 8.2
6.85 10.1
538.0 5.76 15.3
606.2 6,11 9,3
599.1 6.89 12.1
623.1 6,20 12,7
770.3 7.39 9.0
592.8 7.23 13.5
5.18 10,6
5.53 9.2
1.92 10,6 630.9
3.27 21.a 875.6
0.72 2a.P 1307.0
2.26 11,0 732.7
1.83 7.0 633.5
1,77 10,1 596.2
2,68 63,0 607,2
2.28 37.1 613.1
2.68 10.5 602.0
2.70 16,2 683,5
3,ae 8a,7 676.0
3.80 02.0 802.1
0.13 70.2 8 0 7.2
2.59 27.6 626,0
3.65 20,1 701,9
8.16 35.9 1026.9
3.07 51.7 670.0
2.99 25.6 710.9
2.73 01.5 600.7
3.89 38.0 800.3
0.12 107.5 709,1
2.78 13.0
0.65 9.7
0.78 6.5
2.79 11.7
0.70 13.b
2.38 10,0
5.05 11.8
2.81 13.1
0.98 12.7
3.11 12.3
5.95 10.8
0.16 9.6
8.10 9.5
3.22 13.1
2.95 11.9
0.52 5.9
5.59 11.6
}.oo 11.7
a.28 13.1
0.15 9.7
5.53 8.9
~.29 66.9 781.6 3.77 9.9
~,21 OO.O 1001.0 5.69 7.9
2.68 22,3 630.3 6.06 13.1
2.00 17.0 616.8
5.30 19.8 1017.1
3.03 39.2 715.8
3.51 13.6
0.66 6.3
7.55 11.3
3.23 20,1 723,0 o.Ou ||.6
0.75 17.9 972.0 5.17 B.7
2.63 36.2 602.5 6.05 12,5
2.76
5.77
29,0 635.9
30.0 1031.1
3.50 12.9
5.09 8.1
SUM
BAG
3.03
3.38
37.8
05.1
526.3
570.7
3.73 10.9
3.78 13.6
2.88 01.0 587,2
3.63 56.7 619.9
5.73 13,0
6,66 12,3
2,75 29,6 653,3
3.10 00.7 700.7
0,23 12.5
0.35 10.9
33
0,61
18.7
80,8
0.06
76.5
0,51
15.5
07,8
0.11
120
o.oo
0.5
1 10.5
0.13
76.2
30
6.98
236.2
1010.7
0.02
6.3
9.05
279,0
881 .7
1.58
6.6
0.10
7.9
1007.5
1 .26
6.2
35
3.66
123,8
582.3
0.20
11.3
3.76
90.2
567,7
0.53
12.3
2.10
5.7
767.2
0.58
11.3
16
3.67
133.3
086.9
0.2b
12.5
1 .70
15.1
601 ,tt
0.91
10.1
1 .6U
7.2
692.3
0.98
12.5
37
1.89
21.7
393.0
1.50
20.5
0.98
1.7
513. 3
2.20
16.9
1.J9
2.8
062.2
2.52
18.8
38
1.77
6.7
037.6
1 .99
19.6
0.89
0.8
563.9
2.75
15.5
2.02
6.1
090,7
6,50
17.5
39
2.1 3
10,0
061.7
5.39
18,3
1 ,70
6.5
503,8
8.36
15.9
2.29
18,7
550,6
2.77
15.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLOM FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARRON TO HYOROGFn RATIO
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
•••
007 1970 OLDS CUTL 550
VEH YFAR MAKE MODL CID
••• •••• «•••
008 1970 PLYM SATE 318
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
009 1970 PONT BONN 000
MODE
NO.
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NUX
MPG
1
2.63
58.9
538.0
1.64
13.9
6,77
160.5
400.9
2,80
13.2
4,09
4.4
684.3
3.07
12.6
2
2.<19
6.4
903.1
J."J
9.6
6,00
84.0
696,4
3.33
10.5
3.92
18.4
1033.2
2.96
8.3
3
3.61
7.3
1 190.4
3.34
7.3
11.72
184,1
861,3
2.79
7.5
6.19
7,3
1440.8
2.78
6.0
a
1.72
5.2
550.0
2.18
15.7
4.04
85,7
5S6.0
1.97
12.6
2,09
5.2
847. 1
1.79
10.3
5
1.64
6.3
501.7
3,74
17,2
2.52
32.«
494,0
3.19
16.1
1.60
4.9
703.1
2.84
12.4
6
l.«3
4,9
616.8
3,05
14,1
2.47
16.0
506.6
1 .86
16,4
2.01
#.5
632.9
2.75
13.7
7
3.01
51.<1
091 .0
3.19
15.3
2,97
51.2
508.8
5,03
13.9
3.06
37,9
657.1
3,07
12.2
8
2.31
69.0
658.7
3.52
11.5
1.98
37.8
572.3
3,73
13.9
2.76
50.3
671.7
0.02
11.7
9
2.62
33.5
538.5
4,26
14.8
3.27
27.0
506.9
0.42
10.8
2.98
23.2
608. 1
0.49
12,8
10
2.52
33.2
729.0
0.11
11.2
3.53
30,9
615.2
3.85
13.2
2.93
10.2
763.2
0,96
11.2
1 1
3.64
116,1
566.1
0,38
11.7
3,66
54.7
635,0
6.96
12.1
3.27
"2.5
700.3
0,85
10,8
12
3.39
03,3
933.9
5.90
8.8
0,35
36,5
760,3
5.74
10,6
3.95
35,6
922,6
6,58
9,0
13
3,77
81,1
735,8
5,95
10,1
0,73
04,3
710.8
7.89
U.2
3,99
72,6
807.2
6,19
9.1
10
2.15
35.7
627.0
0,51
12.8
3.34
28.0
560.7
0.51
14.4
2.85
21.6
673.8
4.09
12.0
15
3.30
19,6
672,2
4,00
12.0
5,72
64,1
569.9
2.62
12.9
0.92
10,9
729.7
5.92
1 1.6
16
6.21
23,8
1013.5
0.40
6,0
13,51
270.3
1079.6
3.76
5.7
9.82
10.2
1500.8
1 1 .90
5.6
17
2.51
15,7
654,2
5.02
12.9
0.22
85.6
569,0
0,35
12.0
3,16
30.4
702.0
0.01
11.7
18
1.95
6.8
702.7
4.18
12.3
3.07
01,1
566.5
3.05
13.8
3.04
10.6
7 30.8
3.25
11.7
19
2.19
21.0
590.2
0.22
l«.l
3,08
69.3
576.2
3.77
12.8
2.92
15.3
659.0
0.05
12.8
20
2.37
10.5
843.8
0,89
10.2
0,36
09.3
678.3
3.97
11.5
0.16
9.2
870,6
0.04
9.9
21
<1.05
161.5
672.8
0.68
9.0
0.79
123.7
661.5
5.55
10.2
3.45
133.8
711.6
0.14
9.5
22
3.44
75.1
753.0
0.67
10.1
0.90
65.1
680. 1
0.51
11.1
0.55
56,6
837.1
0.52
9.0
23
4,42
37.1
986.2
5.13
8.0
8,12
101.3
813.3
0,46
8.9
6.35
26.7
1011.0
0,95
6.2
24
2.34
20.2
572.9
5,87
10,4
3.07
33.2
564.9
5.42
10.2
2.69
21.6
625.0
5.18
13,3
25
2.21
17.3
634.3
5.01
13.3
3,15
23.5
559.3
4.09
10.6
2.61
11.3
680.2
5.10
12.5
26
4.84
22.5
969.9
4,98
8.7
8.99
89.3
798.7
3.79
9.2
6.75
5.8
1036.9
8.13
8.3
27
3.11
71.9
675.1
5.04
11.1
3.74
58.0
643.3
6.60
11.9
3.11
31.0
754.1
6.05
10.9
28
2.68
31.4
696.8
4,76
1 1.8
0.27
01.7
598.8
4.18
13.1
3.57
11.0
701.9
0.25
11.5
29
3.64
19.5
878.5
0.55
9.6
7.77
126.0
762.3
3.65
9.0
5.07
7.5
957.0
0.60
9.0
30
2.61
51.3
569. 1
5.20
13.5
2.86
00,5
607.5
5.31
13,0
3.95
53.3
662.0
0.73
11.7
31
2.57
58,3
638. 1
4,36
12.0
3.67
27.9
559.1
4.42
14.0
2,90
33,6
685. 3
4,19
11,9
32
4.92
63.3
934.0
4.36
8.5
8.82
91.3
797.5
4.04
9.2
6.70
27.7
999.2
4,06
8.3
SUM 2.28 31.8 600,7 U.J9 12,7
BAG 2.78 52.7 696.7 <1,75 11.3
3,50 07.0 506.6 a,36 10,0
3.98 55.1 636.7 0,54 12.1
2,62 22,0 704,8 0.44 11.9
3.5a 49.a 781,3 a.60 10.2
33
0,57
6.7
186.2
0,59
04,7
1.06
36,7
56,7
0.05
75.0
0,09
0.6
123.6
0.16
70,2
30
0,19
22,8
1701.0
3,06
5.1
10.13
097,6
619.1
0.00
6. 1
5,32
29.3
1770.1
3.22
4.8
35
1.11
7.8
919.9
1.00
9.5
6.27
260,5
055,2
0.31
10.0
1 .98
o.l
819.7
0.61
10,7
36
1.03
0.2
620.3
0,70
l«.l
3.31
147 .7
410.3
0.36
13.6
1 .60
6.1
857.0
0.90
10.2
37
1.37
2.7
020.7
2.90
20.5
2.72
35.2
302,2
2,38
21.9
1,13
3,1
513,5
1,06
17,0
36
1.23
3.1
074.8
2.60
18.4
2.08
5.0
019.9
2.02
20.0
1.06
6,7
525,1
2.52
16,0
39
1.20
«,3
576,2
5,12
15.1
2.18
12.1
067.0
5.39
18,0
1.29
5.6
626,6
6,06
13,9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A ltl.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS On INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
DETROIT
VfH YEAR
010 1970
MAKE WOOL CID
VUIK SEDA 97
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
Oil 197 3 AMMO HORN 258
VEH YEAH MAKE MIJDL CID
012 1975 RUIC LFSA 150
MODE
Nil,
HC
cn
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C<)2 NO* MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
2
1
a
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
I 1
12
II
14
15
lb
17
16
19
20
21
2?
21
21
25
26
27
28
29
10
11
12
5.33
6.20
9.90
4.62
2. 74
2.11
~. 21
2.57
1.01
2.66
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
OETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
013
1973
BUIC
LIMI
455
010
1973
CADI
DEVI
472
015
1973
CAPR
SEDA
122
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
".52
100.5
670.2
3,29
10.5
3,26
64.9
769.0
4.41
10.1
2.67
26.6
189.6
4.51
37.0
2
a.a7
68.6
803.0
2,90
9.6
3.33
50.2
970.8
3.39
8.3
3.07
15.1
317.0
5.61
25.i
J
7.50
157.a
1264.9
2.78
5.8
4.91
92.0
1439.9
0.06
5.5
5.12
35.2
389,3
5.06
19.3
u
2.76
48.5
626.3
2.31
12.5
2.15
20.1
709.6
5,07
11.3
2.36
11.5
159.0
5,47
48.1
5
2.92
25.4
552.S
3,71
14,8
1.68
5.2
623,0
5,36
13.9
1,60
3.5
316.0
7,00
27.2
6
2.18
12.S
561 .J
2.51
15.1
1.06
2.0
635,2
3.37
13.8
1.37
1.0
281 .2
5.68
30,9
7
2.94
106,0
585.3
3.84
11.7
2.05
56.2
714.6
6.03
11.0
2.10
17.4
289.0
7.75
27.5
a
2.59
55.3
624,3
3.93
12.3
1.97
42.7
702 ,4
4.51
11.4
1 .69
25.4
256.2
6.11
29.0
9
2.23
38,6
584.9
0.88
13.6
2.03
30.4
663.4
5.09
12.4
1.50
8.6
264.2
8.02
31.0
10
2.38
25. 7
679.5
4.81
12.2
2.15
19.7
775.1
4,00
10.9
1.62
3.2
257.4
6.67
33.2
11
2.52
76.3
679,0
5.33
11.0
2.59
78.3
790.4
5.57
9.6
2.97
19.3
298.1
8.67
26.3
12
2.92
44.6
841 .6
6.46
9.6
2.88
40.7
952.3
5.52
8.6
2.31
6.2
332.2
9.32
25.0
13
2.76
49,5
822.5
7.34
9.8
2.91
92.5
908.6
5.95
8.3
2.64
31.3
355.6
9.50
21.5
la
2.04
26,8
646.3
4,94
12.8
1.86
24.1
706.5
0,30
11.6
1 .60
9.4
250.0
6.30
32.9
15
2.56
36,5
720.5
3.30
11.3
2.28
19.1
803.9
2.70
10.6
4.53
12.6
262.3
3.65
29.9
16
2.IT
145,6
1546,9
4.39
5.0
4,60
43.7
1740.7
3,89
4.9
1 1 .91
00.0
477 .6
4.57
15.2
17
2.93
79.3
708.7
4,89
10.5
2.22
60.6
755,0
0,20
10.4
3,04
10.0
310.8
10.36
25.6
IS
2.47
34.0
670,8
2.99
12.1
1,83
19.0
807,6
3,73
10,5
2,20
2.0
300,3
6,56
28.6
19
2.02
65.9
680,9
4,21
11.2
1,87
30,8
688,7
4,09
11.9
3,60
12.2
305.9
8.72
26,3
20
2.81
45,9
795,7
3,18
10.1
2.11
20.4
906.9
4.05
9.0
2.97
2.6
350.5
8.32
2o.o
21
4.01
198,9
754.3
3,66
8.2
2.95
149.9
856,5
5,80
6.1
3.29
65.2
317.7
6.52
20,6
22
3.46
90,5
785,3
3.92
9.5
2,70
53.4
859.5
5,00
9.3
2.79
27.1
282.9
5.95
26.5
23
5.00
118.6
1047.3
5.18
7.1
3,76
54.4
1159,1
7.24
7.1
4.78
34.1
367.6
8.74
20.3
2a
2.62
54.1
621.1
a.86
12.4
2.02
41.1
689.0
5.16
11.7
1.73
10.4
293.7
8,79
28.1
25
2.06
J2.S
624.1
4.15
13.0
1.81
21.7
692.9
4.27
12.1
1.38
3.3
239.1
6.46
35,7
26
3.69
64,0
995.5
4.15
8.0
3.07
22.6
1106.7
4.00
7.7
6.47
13.2
350.3
5.28
22.7
27
3.08
103„0
749.4
5.70
9.6
2,40
71.2
816,7
5.23
9.5
2.32
9.1
310.9
10.96
?6.0
28
2.63
22,6
710.0
4,46
11.8
2.12
25.9
684,5
4.58
12.1
1 .76
1.1
269.2
7,03
32.1
29
4.24
93.7
982.1
4.15
7.8
3.42
42.5
1073,3
6.03
7.7
3.67
18.7
321 .9
7.98
20.0
JO
2.64
85.1
643.7
4,09
11.3
2.32
60.7
717.9
0.78
10.7
1.52
6.5
297.5
9,66
28.4
31
2.51
53,3
634.0
3,80
12.2
1.94
33.6
715.0
0.33
11.5
1.29
5.7
251.3
7.18
33.6
32
4.29
S3.4
1025,8
4,11
7.6
3,28
38,3
1135.6
0.06
7.0
5.86
25.2
307 ,9
5.90
21.9
SUM
2.46
51.7
655,7
4.12
11.9
1.78
35.3
741.1
0.06 11.1
1.79
11.1
270,5
6,70 29,8
BAG
2.63
64.0
733,4
4,73 :
10,5
2.21
51,1
828.5
5,09
9.7
2.22
20.6
290.9
7,07 26.9
33
0.82
28,4
124.5
0.07
51.7
0,46
16,3
140.2
0,09
52.1
0.45
5.7
18,7
0.13
306
34
9.22
515,2
1513.8
0.95
4.4
4,08
166.1
1682.1
0.79
4.5
3.43
70.9
331.6
0.53
19.6
35
4.32
154,2
797.0
0.39
8.4
1.93
96.3
865.2
0.21
8.7
1 .49
23.1
238. 1
0.27
31.8
36
2.11
T3.1
665.9
0.02
11.3
0,72
29,8
785.1
0.51
10.6
2.06
14.5
215.8
0.35
36.2
37
1.46
27.2
431.2
1.28
18.5
0.85
15.4
516.9
1.13
16.3
1.05
3.8
225.0
2.17
37.9
38
1.62
6.8
521 .8
1.81
16.5
0,68
4.8
592.0
2.54
14.8
0.63
4.1
278.9
5.31
30.9
39
1 .66
18.2
572.5
5.53
14.6
0.86
5.1
660.6
5.97
13.2
0.60
2.5
239.7
7.29
36.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX D.CONT'O
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH YEAR
016 1973
MAKE MOOL CID
CHEV 9TAW 110
VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CID
• •• +mmm •••• mmmm mmm
017 1973 CHEV CAM» 250
VEH YEAH MAKE M()DL CID
018 1973 CHfcv CHEV 307
MUDE
NO.
HC
CO
CO?
NllX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
Ctl
C02
NOX MPG
10
1 1
12
1 3
11
15
16
17
18
1»
20
21
22
23
21
25
26
27
28
29
3.80 32.5
1,18 52,3
6.69 78,0
3.09 ill.3
1.86 19.2
1.75 18.6
1.93 31,7
1.78 37.1
1.90 23.1
1.92 17.9
2.01 31.1
2.32 27.8
2.29 «0.0
t•62 20.1
2.79 36.5
6.93 117.2
2.10 #5.6
2.02 26,1
2.03 38,8
2.96 13.6
2.17 76.3
2,53 11,0
3.93 67.1
1,68 26,6
1.60 19,6
6.61 119.6
1.98 50.0
2.20
3.H
27.8
56,1
309.6
131.0
589.6
301.1
319.0
328.6
311 .1
313.8
330.7
371.0
377.6
081.0
178.5
333.1
338.7
615.5
388.3
361.1
311.1
128.1
«18,9
121,0
539.2
J69.1
322,7
136.0
128.3
369. 1
171.1
3.90 23.8
1,05 16,8
1.90 12,1
3.27 23.1
5.21 25.0
3.81 21,1
5.98 22.1
1.79 21.8
6,61 23.8
5.68 21.9
8.11 20.3
7.11 16.7
8.08 16.2
5.80 21,0
1.18 2).9
5.03 10,1
1,90 19.0
1.82 21.5
1,55 21.5
5.16 17,5
5,90 16.2
6.19 17,7
6.72 13.5
5,80 21,3
5.16 21.8
1.11 13.8
6.10 17.3
5,65 21.1
5,10 15.5
3.60 21.3
3,15 11,9
5.60 17.1
2,19 10.8
2.09 15.3
1.81 9.7
588.3
515,8
871.2
5.98 11.0
5.99 15.3
7.88 9.7
165.6 1,55 18.1
119.3 5,73 19.7
313.3 3.70 21.1
2,t>S
2.16
2.56
2.12
3.11
3.1"
3.15
2.03
2.88
5.92
2, "1
2.11
51.5
20.2
21.1
10.5
51.7
21.8
57.5
19.6
11.3
u.l
33.8
21.1
2.07 25,1
2.79 21.6
1,12 132.8
1,68 16.1
5.19 30.9
2.50 15.9
2.07 15.3
1,21 13.0
2.57 11.1
2.20
3.57
15.8
19,1
176,7
388.1
131.6
105.3
501.3
191.9
551.1
376.2
133.2
911.2
486.4
119.0
127.3
528.6
565.9
183.6
696.1
436.7
383.0
616.6
506.1
149. 1
626,6
6.72 15.7
5.90 20.8
6.98 18.6
6.20 20.7
7.01 15.0
6.99 16.5
7.16 13.6
5.39 21.5
4.66 19.3
5.23 9.2
5.59 16.2
1.78 18.1
1.20 18,8
5.20 15,5
4.88 11.3
6,62 15,5
6.91 11,7
5,61 17,2
5,18 21.5
6.12 13,6
6.97 14.3
6.32 18.5
6.15 13,3
3.23 55.7 792.1
2,68 77.7 725.1
1,37 118.H 1158.1
1,97 52.5 623,0
1,32 39.5 559.5
1,02 27.5 523,6
5.76 111.6 535.6
3.02 73.0 519.3
2.00 13.1 573.7
1.57 26.9 610.7
6.05 114.9 594.3
3,34 69.5 792.5
2.78 78.2 703.8
1.50 38.1 581,1
2.77 38.7 692.1
5.73 9u.2 1514.0
3.36 77.7 652.4
1 .89 51 . 1 M4.6
1,39 55.6 638,5
1,67 71.0 741,2
5,27 151,0 636,1
\,00 86,5 699,6
5,32 108.0 898.9
1.74 51.3 562.1
1,36 38.1 559.8
1.31 62,9 958.7
3.29 99.3 620.1
4.46
3,05
49. 3
90,1
6H7 . 1
915.4
1.80 10.0
1.08 10,1
1.20 6.5
1.09 12.5
1.86 11.2
n.91 15,6
1.36 12.2
1.12 13.8
2.11 13.7
1.17 13.5
1.81 11.2
1.92 9.7
3.11 10.6
1,45 13,7
1.02 11.7
1.59 4.3
2.16 11.3
1.13 12.1
2.17 12.0
1.47 10,2
2.20 1n,0
1,32 10,5
1.10 8.2
1.60 13.6
1.08 11,2
2.06 8.3
1.66 11.3
1,19 11,1
1,16 8.3
30
1.67
27.9
397.3
5.90
19,9
2.20
42.3
465.3
6.22
16.5
1.58
62,8
579.2
1.59 13,0
31
1.64
20,8
337.9
5.38
23.6
2.01
21.2
396.7
5,90
20.3
1.58
50.7
610.5
1,23 12.«
32
1.17
57.3
078.5
5.65
15.2
4,64
16.0
612.0
6,31
13.6
3.50
80.7
1029.0
2.91 7.6
SUM
1 .86
24.0
361.0
6,11
21.9
2.29
21,6
435.8
6,20
18,6
1 .94
49.2
628.6
1.17 12.5
RAG
2.08
38.9
385.6
6,18
19.6
2.59
13.4
164 .0
5.90
16,9
2.73
70.3
661,7
1.55 11.1
33
0.37
6.5
54.9
0.11
131
0,53
0.4
88.3
0.17
98,1
0.27
11.2
107.0
0,05 70,7
31
3.81
77.6
616.3
0.68
11.4
5.72
5.7
1059,2
1 .07
8.2
3.06
126.9
1310.2
0.53 5.8
35
2.06
34.7
338.1
0.53
22.2
2.00
«.o
631,0
0.53
13.7
1.53
65.9
681.7
0.26 11.2
36
1.96
35.9
297.7
1,16
24.6
1.37
2.7
122.7
0.11
20.6
0,85
36.9
633.8
0,35 12,8
37
1.50
4.2
277.2
1.57
30.8
1.53
2.2
290.6
3.71
29.7
0.40
14,6
189,0
0.52 17.3
38
1.27
1.7
291. 0
6.91
29.8
1.52
3.1
328.7
1.41
26.2
0,18
13.6
551.3
0.91 15.4
39
0.94
2.2
320.2
7.97
27.2
1.29
3.4
378,9
9.03
22.9
0,13
13,8
600 ,0
1,68 11,3
EMISSinN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL fCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF HflDAU RESUl TS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODI
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
019
1973
CHEV
MONT
350
020
1973
CHEV
CHEV
350
021
1973
CHEV
LAGU
350
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
HPG
HC
CO
Cl)2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
J
2.21
2.#1
3.5b
29.1
37.5
48,3
434.5
702.5
997.6
1.39
2,42
1.89
18,2
11.5
8.2
1,87
2.09
3.63
73.1
44,7
80.9
688.2
760 .0
1260.8
3,84
2.53
3.1 1
1 1.0
10,6
6.3
3.03
2.86
4.64
32.6
44,3
60.7
727,3
769,3
1270.0
5.47
2.71
3.43
11.3
10,5
6.4
4
5
6
1.51
1.22
1.17
23,6
17,0
10.
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
OETROIT
VEH
YEAR
022
1973
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
1
3.00
70.6
2
J.19
96.8
3
1.27
119.9
0
2.18
71.2
5
1.69
13.6
6
1.22
29.2
7
1.72
69.9
8
1.35
67.9
9
1.63
10,8
10
1,36
36,8
1 1
1.92
97.2
12
1.80
62,0
13
2.26
90,2
1 0
1.17
17.8
15
2,11
51,0
16
6.90
167.8
17
1.82
73.3
18
1.37
12.6
19
1.52
09,6
20
1,67
19,5
21
1.91
126,1
22
1.62
69. 1
23
2.62
77.0
20
1 .37
52.5
25
1.00
10,1
26
1.51
70,0
27
1 .85
85,0
28
1 .32
39.0
29
2.57
61.2
30
1.39
60,3
3]
1.12
53,0
32
5.11
96,0
SUM
1.07
OB, 7
BAG
1 .86
71.7
MnDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
MONT
150
023
1973
CHFV
CAPR
000
020
1973
CHRY
NEHY
NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
CH2
NOX
1.80
1.52
1.31
11,6
10.5
7.5
0.76
0.11
0.37
11.8
75.1
131.1
507.5
689,9
1025.9
6.01
9,08
15.91
15.1
11,0
7.2
U,50
0.56
7.93
98.8
103.6
200,0
660.5
861.6
1105.0
1.00
3,05
3.82
1.27
2.02
1.55
13.9
16.0
17.3
1.71
1.19
1.51
37.8
20.3
22.6
575.0
525.5
085.2
1.21
1.01
2.12
1 3.9
15.8
16.9
3.52
2.32
2.30
91.6
50.2
13.2
666.0
561. 1
506.5
3.09
3.65
3.26
1.77
1.95
2.51
10.5
10.1
15.6
2.20
2.26
2.23
80,1
65.5
52.0
551.0
505.8
536,2
1.52
1,21
3.81
1 3.0
13.5
10.2
2.66
2.18
2.36
69.0
56.0
17.6
577.6
552.0
506.5
5.88
1.50
6.00
2,06
2.15
1.09
11,0
12.5
11,0
1.01
2.89
1.53
06.7
107,2
76.1
562.0
605,8
713.0
1.51
3.31
1.37
13.8
11.3
10.5
2.90
2.96
1.90
50.8
78.7
75. 3
589.6
610.3
723.1
5.03
7,26
6,07
2.60
1 .99
1 ,09
11.3
10.5
9.5
«.17
1.15
1.09
112.3
66.6
65.1
682,9
535.6
607.7
1.11
3.H
1 .65
9.7
13.6
12.3
1.11
2.60
1,69
78,9
50. 3
80. 1
706.0
553,9
650.1
9,00
0 ,99
2,81
1 .69
2.78
2.59
5.9
13.1
13.9
7.77
2.32
3.IS
120.9
66,5
58.0
I 334.1
586,5
593.5
2.20
3.60
2.57
5.7
12.7
12.8
9.21
1.31
3.31
260. 3
96.6
72,0
1256.3
631.0
628.2
3,00
5.02
o .29
2.75
2,38
2.09
10.3
11.5
11.0
1.21
5.23
a.20
58.5
90,7
156.9
535.0
685,8
61b.S
3.56
2,85
2.R2
11,9
10.5
9.9
3,05
3.95
«.H
88.1
107.2
102.0
569.3
711.9
611 .8
1,16
0.53
5.80
2.02
2,98
2. 7U
11.2
8,1
15,0
5.69
7.27
2.05
108.0
103.0
51.1
662.8
809. 1
575.0
3.57
1,80
1.31
10.0
8.6
13.3
3.90
5.76
2,66
98.6
US.6
68,1
682.7
920.3
397.3
1.80
0.71
a .80
2.21
1 .78
3.26
10.8
9.1
11.7
1,01
6,99
2.73
50,2
80,7
95.5
523,8
801 ,6
657,1
3.20
2.71
3.92
11.5
8.9
10.9
2,70
5.56
3,20
65,0
122.3
92.7
002.2
901 .9
605.9
1.05
3.SO
6.59
2.01
2.75
2.00
12.9
10,5
10.0
3.82
0,79
2,08
69,9
80.1
79,0
606,2
801,6
600,0
3.27
0.03
3.21
12.2
9.3
12.1
3.60
5.75
2.67
75.2
157.7
69.3
601 .5
866.0
631.2
5.01
0.10
6.62
1.78
6.01
11.2
6.1
3.00
10,66
78.1
191.1
501.1
721,6
2.91
2.06
13.2
8.0
2.70
5.OB
66,2
12B.0
526.2
879.S
3.90
3.72
2.55 :
2.19
13.1
12.1
2.25
3.39
51.8
85.0
583.0
638.3
3.57
3.52
13.1
11.3
2.92
3.07
65.3
81,5
589.0
600,5
5.05 1
1.90 1
MPG
526.8
680.1
908.3
517.7
068.9
160.2
096.7
518.9
092.)
571.7
551. J
705.7
629.1
530,9
806,1
550,5
565.9
559.2
685.5
604 ,1
677.9
972.3
501.1
533.7
855. J
6)7,0
622.7
703.0
535.7
539.2
598.5
595.0
5.2
7.6
7.7
7.7
8.1
33
0.11
13.5
96.3
0,00
70.7
0.13
13.3
97.1
0.06
71,1
0.79
21.0
135.0
0.22
51.9
31
3.98
105,5
1207.6
0,38
6.1
3.93
111.3
122 3,3
0.58
6.3
8.62
238.1
H29.7
1 .06
U.8
35
1 .12
89.5
1025.3
0.35
7.6
1.38
51.7
807 ,0
0,10
9.9
0,10
113.9
810 . 3
0.61
8.6
36
l.H
72. 1
720.7
0,28
10.5
0.83
38,5
595.1
0.32
13.5
2.71
67.9
621 .1
0.53
12.1
37
1.23
13.2
516.6
1 .18
15.5
0.76
19.7
158.0
O.io
18.1
1.55
25.5
079.2
1.05
16.9
38
0.95
12.1
560,0
2.36
15.1
0.67
5.2
056.7
2.51
19.0
1 .99
26.5
0bO , 1
5.03
17.5
39
0.71
10.2
577 ,9
0.06
10,9
0.51
5.7
515.8
5.69
16.0
2.30
19.1
096.7
6.00
15.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL fCONOHY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
A PPF NO IX 0,CONT'D
listing of modal results on individual vehicles
DETPOIT
VEH
025
YEAR
••
1973
MAKE
DATS
HODL
SEDA
CID
146
VEH
026
TEAR
1973
MAKE
DODG
MODL
DART
CID
225
VEH
027
YEAH
1973
MAKE
• • ••
DODG
MODL
• • • "
DART
CIO
318
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NQX
MPG
HC
CO
CD2
NO*
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
9,83
7,04
13,74
117,6
120.5
198.6
214.3
332.6
444,2
1 .68
1 .40
1.12
20,6
16,3
11.1
3.07
3.19
4,79
67.6
52.7
3*. 2
367.9
466.7
687.8
1 .33
2.40
2.44
18.3
15.9
11 .6
3.87
3.73
6,69
96.1
60,7
148.6
412.2
557.6
798.9
1 .90
2.43
2.24
15.4
13.3
8.4
4
5
6
4.20
2.62
2.93
77.9
51.1
39.1
298.0
280,5
251.5
1.54
3.01
2.74
20.5
24.0
27.5
2, 16
1.90
1.75
16.0
44,9
24.5
344.4
308.8
321.5
2.95
3.46
2.71
23.6
23.0
24.3
2.57
1,93
1 .84
46,9
17.4
11.9
491.9
427,1
405.9
2.32
4.97
4,68
15.5
19.3
20.6
7
8
9
2.66
3.25
2.77
76,7
52.2
52.2
306,6
265.5
280,5
3.98
3.62
4.05
20.4
24.8
23.9
2.17
1.71
1.97
75.4
34.2
61 .3
340.2
387,9
345.9
3.85
3.33
3.20
19,1
19.9
19.8
2.10
1 .96
2.11
28.4
25.6
20.8
482,6
452.3
474.0
5.70
5.31
6.16
16.6
17.8
17.3
10
11
12
3.54
2.86
4,18
47,6
97,9
65,3
288.1
299.0
344.1
3,76
3,83
4,58
23.7
19.2
19.3
1.99
2.51
2.56
28,8
105.5
49,6
380,9
376,6
472.0
3.47
2.75
",15
20,5
16. 1
15.9
2,73
2.73
3,33
22.0
41.0
36.1
473,0
518.6
582,9
6,63
6.15
7,63
17.2
15.0
13,7
13
14
15
3,84
3.04
3.89
105,5
52.4
60.0
333,5
256.1
299.2
4.62
3.07
1.71
17.4
25.5
21.9
3.13
2.15
2.«3
120,0
96.1
25.1
435.2
358.5
372,0
2.82
3,08
2.42
14.0
17.2
21.2
3.32
2.52
«,51
53.0
29.0
33.6
567.2
433.7
497.8
6.57
5.57
3.45
13.4
18.2
15.7
16
17
18
11.67
5.24
4,24
201.8
102,0
75.1
600.0
292.7
287.1
2,08
3,87
3,23
0,3
18,9
21.2
6,00
2.72
2.49
"2.1
71.9
58.4
778,8
334,8
354.2
2,96
1,36
2.40
10.3
19.4
19.6
10,22
3,55
2.76
135.3
76.6
36.7
963,3
477.2
486.9
4,16
3.87
4.04
7.3
14.6
16.0
19
20
21
3.20
5.03
4.91
72,3
99.9
122.0
313,1
318.3
320.4
3.35
3,08
4.85
20.3
18.1
16.8
2.55
3.06
2.76
99.6
73.5
110.3
311.6
432.3
401 . 1
1.28
2.43
4.06
18.6
15.9
15.2
2.97
3.56
3.40
58.2
43.8
84.3
449,4
586.4
530.0
3,61
4.91
5.40
16.1
1 S.i
13.2
22
23
24
10.45
14. 30
3.61
48,5
117.6
66,3
340,1
391 ,8
264,6
5,83
". 35
3,82
19,7
11.3
23,3
2.U8
3,49
2.36
58.2
68.2
85.1
458,2
531.8
368.2
3.55
3.63
2.82
15,9
13.7
16.8
3,54
6.10
2.54
52.5
91.8
30.7
534.8
696.3
446.9
4.93
5.26
7.13
14.1
10.3
17.6
25
2b
27
3.72
7.24
3.95
54.4
93.0
83,9
266,3
430.2
308.0
3.65
3.17
4.60
24.3
14.8
19.6
2,01
4.21
2.91
as.b
48.2
151.1
357.1
542.5
494.1
2.97
3.45
2.45
20.4
14.1
12.5
2.55
6.43
3.22
25.5
54.7
55 . ft
421.6
687.7
519.1
5.74
5.06
6,58
18.9
11.2
14.4
28
29
30
4,48
12,00
3,23
52.6
104.6
87,2
285.9
415.8
285.9
3.74
3.54
4.09
23.2
14.4
20.5
2.34
3.32
2,60
41.3
60.4
87.9
411.7
469.3
321.4
3.64
3.45
2,54
18.3
14,9
19.0
3,66
5.71
2,59
40.1
92.4
37.4
503.6
643.9
457.7
6.06
4.74
6.58
15.3
11.0
16.9
31
32
3.31
8.11
57.3
115.6
258.8
389.9
3.30
2,78
21.7
14.9
2.16
3.90
51.4
56.9
377,1
S7T.3
2.88
3.36
19.1
13.1
2.55
6,00
32.1
63.4
446.2
685.0
5.71
5.18
17,6
11.0
SUM
BAG
«.J5
U.J?
65.a
75.2
276.8
303.6
3,33 22,6
3.89 20,0
I ,99
2.39
au.e
66.3
384.7
403.6
4,30 19.J
3,40 17,1
2,73
2,96
34,6
42,9
475,0
501.8
5.70 16.5
5.79 15.3
33
2,63
28.3
25,5
0,03
112
0,26
1.3
75.1
0.03
113
0.69
18,3
79.0
0.20
80.8
34
28,33
350.9
526.5
2.70
7.6
3.40
19.0
913.8
0.31
9.3
8.61
236.8
884,9
1.16
6.9
35
6.06
152.9
325.2
0.24
15.2
1.58
6.6
469,4
0.73
18,3
3.45
105,3
556.8
0.53
12.1
36
3.49
70.4
322.7
0.28
20.0
1.20
2,3
348,6
1 .00
24,9
1.97
59.4
480,4
0.53
15. J
37
3,19
42,6
223,9
1,06
29,5
1,13
1.3
266,9
3.85
32.6
2.74
9.6
351 .5
2.63
23.6
38
3.41
39.6
249,3
3.42
27.5
1,19
1.6
314.5
6.01
27.7
1.28
1.5
400.4
4.95
21.6
39
2.87
34.2
220.3
3.34
31.3
l.ta
379.8
7.95
22.7
1.84
15.8
435.2
8.16
19. 1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUMF A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDI* 01CUNT 10
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS UN INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
DETRUIT
VEh
YEAR
MAKE
MOOL
CID
VEH
YEAR
make
HOOL
CIO
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MIIOL
CIO
...
....
....
- — -
...
...
....
....
....
...
...
....
....
....
...
028
1973
FORD
PINT
122
029
1973
FORD
MAVE
200
030
1973
FIIRD
MUST
302
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
CC12
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
Cl)2
NO*
MPG
HC
cn
cm
Nl 1X
MPG
......
........
.......
......
......
1
5.2:
40. 1
179.9
1.95
35.1
2.83
62.5
391.6
1.11
17.8
3.15
30,5
545.1
3.48
11.7
2
3.68
53.3
399.2
2.00
17.9
3.66
S3.9
615,9
2.93
13,0
3,67
28,2
834 .1
4.14
10.0
3
6,51
69.6
494.8
2.01
1".2
6.66
77,6
641 ,4
1.27
9.0
6.71
76,0
1159,8
4.49
6.8
u
2.59
34,9
286.2
3.01
25.4
2.06
22.2
412,5
3.30
19.5
3.33
31.6
652.2
1.35
12.5
5
1 .72
17.8
270.5
4.79
29.2
1.69
9.3
316,6
3.59
26,4
2.11
15.7
580,0
5.39
14.5
6
1.53
10.9
254.1
2.86
32.2
1 ,76
8.5
316,4
2.27
26.5
2.05
13.8
563.3
3.16
15.0
7
8
9
10
11
If
1.68 18.2
2.11 33.4
2.11 17.7
I."? 15.6
2.24 31.6
2.17 25.1
241 .7
286.7
268,9
1440,4
316.7
377.4
3.96 32,2
J.13 25.7
3.99 29.J
3.99 18,8
5.11 23.8
5.01 20.9
1 .58
1 .96
2.27
2.26
2.25
2.83
17,a 289.5
J5.3 347 .S
17.8 304.0
13.3 372,1
32,7 366,8
20.0 484.3
3.28 27.6
1.16 21,7
3.52 26,2
3,47 22,2
4.68 20.9
5.05 16.7
3.28 45.8 580.0
3.17 37,2 572.5
J.12 31.0 576.5
3.00 23.5 623.9
3.33 35.3 620.1
3.76 30,5 743.2
5.87 13.4
4,73 13,8
6.18 14.0
4.47 13.2
7.78 12.9
6.30 11.1
13
10
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
2.72 38.3
1.89 23.6
4.38 36.6
11,40 103,5
3.17 48.6
2.29 21.11
3.13
2.80
2."
30.0
20,0
31.5
372.3
281 .5
278.2
530.0
296.2
327 .2
305.0
391.2
330 .8
5.17 20,1
3.87 27.3
2.26 25.4
2,72 12,2
3.50 23.2
2.93 24.1
4.62 24.5
4.53 20,6
4.88 22.8
3.15
2.20
3.61
7,84
2.64
2.72
2.30
3.29
2,89
14,2 055,1
18.5 371.8
25.6 380.5
86.7 831,7
50.U 388.4
27.7 387.9
22.5 344.3
30.1 151.0
58.8 395.5
6.79 16.6
3.82 21.8
2.41 20.5
2.48 8.9
4.27 18.6
2.89 20.2
4.26 22.9
3.50 17,4
4.76 17,9
3.93 40.7 730.2
3.06 27.9 576.1
3.94 42.1 627.7
9.51 137.7 1190.0
3.99 66.5 594.8
3.46 35.1 693.0
3.36 46.9 547.4
«.47 55.8 792.8
4.46 85.0 650.3
8,68 11.0
4.76 14.1
2.98 12.6
3.91 h.2
5.67 12,5
4,53 11.7
4.42 14.0
4.52 9.9
7.30 11.1
22
23
2a
25
26
27
28
29
30
2.87
5.06
1 .89
34.7
55.6
19.1
1.61 15.6
5.55 41.1
2.72 39.8
2.37
4.24
1 .95
20.2
44.0
22.1
351 .7
419.2
304 .7
300.4
126.5
329.6
332,2
403.1
332.6
4.46 21.4
4.45 17.0
5.34 26.1
4.27 26.9
3.78 17.8
4.88 22.1
2.98 23,9
4.10 18.3
2.44 23.8
3.50
5.05
2.12
2.09
5.27
2.62
2.65
2.50
2.04
44.5
66,2
21.6
440,4
534.0
332.3
12.5 351.1
32.6 529.7
37.1 414,0
17,9 414,5
58.2 501.3
23.5 324.9
4.23 17.0
5.06 13.6
4.28 23.8
3.68 23,5
3.62 14.8
6.37 18.5
4.32 19,7
5.05 14.8
3.65 24.1
4.31 55.2
6.80 101.0
3.17 33.6
2.94 21.3
6.01 63,6
3.69 42.2
3.51 35,7
5.95 96.0
3.52 47.4
7 10.9
916.3
587.1
559.3
850.5
648.8
5.45 10.9
7.00 8.1
6.34 13.7
4.72 14.7
4.19 9.2
".15 12.2
651.0 4,97 12.4
806.2 5.3B 9.1
581.8 S.56 13.3
31
32
1 .72
5.31
22,6
49.2
295.0
415.8
2.14 26.4
3.38 17,4
2.23
5,36
21.5
01.2
378.3
518.5
3.90 21.2
3.22 14,8
3.64
6.53
579.1 4.31 11.5
902.3 4.08 8.4
SUM
BAG
2.03
2.65
22.1
33.6
304.5
301,0
4.20 25.7
4.22 24.5
2,09
2,98
20.2
31.3
376.5
398.6
4,06 21,4
4.20 19.5
3,06
3,63
32.1
42.0
619,6
656.4
4.9B 13,1
5.69 12.1
33
0.39
5.7
13.3
0.18
165
7
12.5
64.7
0.09
103
0.86
12.6
103.4
0.25
70.5
3u
* 3.51
<>0.4
538,2
0.53
12.8
5.52
156.0
795.0
1.28
8.4
9.56
114.3
1286.8
2.12
5.7
35
2.60
42.3
153.7
0.63
16.8
1.34
10.1
707 .2
0.77
12.2
5.05
77.2
699.7
0.64
10.6
36
1 .92
36.3
265.0
0.37
27.0
0.78
1.1
496. 1
0.62
17.6
1.96
11.3
722.5
1 . 04
11.8
37
1.58
23.0
232.9
1.23
32.4
1.12
1.7
271.0
1.50
31.8
1 .44
11.9
518.1
1 .SO
16.4
38
0.99
3.5
227.3
3.29
37.6
1.26
2.0
310.2
2.56
28.0
1.34
10.7
529.5
2.70
16.1
39
1.09
5.0
274 ,4
6.80
31.1
1.26
2.1
345.3
5.73
25.1
2.37
H.l
542.9
5.63
15.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIU
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MOOAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
OETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CIO
031
1975
FORD
LTD
351
032
1973
FORD
MUST
351
033
1973
FORD
STAW
400
UJ 1
O • 1
O C (
X Z 1
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
3.00
3.35
4.92
20,6
15.9
29,3
574 .9
774.5
1147.9
3.63
4.54
4.58
14.4
11.0
7.3
6.20
5.28
10,21
103.6
53.1
188,1
506,0
628.0
892.1
1 .90
1.51
1.67
12.9
12.2
7.3
6.33
3.67
9,04
23.0
16.3
25.6
490.2
878.7
1074.3
4.59
3.72
4.28
16.2
9.7
7.8
4
5
6
2.27
1 .78
1 .90
15,0
12.0
9.4
621 .8
431.8
456.6
3.90
4,02
4.04
13.6
19.4
18.6
3.93
2.43
2.34
59.2
H.5
1 1.5
536.7
478,9
431.2
2.27
2.57
2.25
13.8
17,2
19.4
3.02
1.69
2.28
18.9
7.2
1.8
752.7
647.9
611.9
3.36
5.07
2.86
11.2
13.4
14.3
7
8
9
2.33
2.59
2.53
81,3
37.2
24,0
555.5
543.0
565.4
6.15
3.14
6,50
12.9
14.6
14.5
3.13
3.08
3.17
39.3
24.4
16,6
509.3
476.2
504.4
4.15
4.17
4.16
15.3
16,9
16.4
3.84
2.67
2.78
68.8
47.8
43.5
617.2
697.6
670.4
6.57
6.93
7,85
12.0
11.4
11.9
10
1 1
12
2.64
3.02
3.62
19.3
53.3
27.8
589.7
618.9
731.4
3.62
7.44
5.08
14.1
12.5
11.3
3.80
4,66
5.48
18,6
40.8
24.6
504.3
535.6
638.7
4.31
5.17
5.42
16.3
14.4
12.8
2.68
3,82
2.95
17.5
79,4
28.9
674.6
686,5
848.8
7.89
8,51
8.97
12.5
10.8
9.8
13
14
15
3.74
3.10
4.05
59.1
24.8
28.9
698.0
565.8
597.7
8.13
3.73
2.70
11.1
14.4
13.5
5.54
4.12
6.19
36.3
18.0
13.2
633,3
497 .8
547 .9
6.40
4.13
2.22
12.5
16.5
15.1
4.03
2.26
4,79
62,5
19.1
13.5
786,0
640.8
589,0
9.78
6.31
3.58
9.9
13.1
14.2
16
17
18
8.27
3.15
2.63
61.6
36.5
21.4
1228.9
605.8
586.2
3.89
6.21
5.00
6,6
13.2
14.1
15.36
4.51
3.38
231.2
82,3
26.5
972.6
445.1
542.4
2.85
2.90
2.35
6.4
15.1
14.9
9.84
3.59
2.20
37,6
40,5
21.2
1042,B
633,2
810.8
4.98
7.17
3.80
7.8
12.5
10.4
19
20
21
2.44
2.94
3.68
18.8
20.0
137,0
570.6
711.0
619.7
6.1 1
6.54
6.45
14.6
11.8
10.5
3.83
4.IS
3,60
65.4
32.5
75.6
435.3
632.7
597.7
2.70
2.61
5.14
16.1
12.7
12.2
3,66
3.34
4,99
33.4
26.9
128,6
585 • 6
950,6
726,5
5.75
3.46
7.67
13.7
8.8
9.u
22
23
24
4.16
5.63
2.36
54.1
50.2
17.2
699.4
930.4
571 .7
3.88
5.20
6.49
11.1
8.6
14.6
4.03
7.29
2.50
33.0
102,6
19.3
601.7
717.4
510.7
4.61
4.95
3.35
13.3
9.8
16.2
3.40
6.46
2.31
68.1
50.5
15.6
754.1
915.3
675,3
5.64
6.44
8.58
10.2
B.7
12.6
25
26
27
2.35
5.09
2.67
17.0
17.6
18.3
561.3
87J.9
653.2
4.25
4.42
9.57
14.9
9.4
12.9
3.49
8.92
3.53
14,4
65.7
40.8
496.7
763.3
558,0
2.15
1 .89
4.24
16.7
9.9
14.0
2.35
5.49
3.17
12.7
20.9
52. 1
660.8
881 .0
765.6
8.30
6.15
9.13
12.9
9.5
10,3
28
29
30
2.77
3.95
2.25
20.6
31.2
32.0
658.2
663.3
595.1
4.26
5.13
8.39
12.7
9.6
13.6
4.44
7,28
2.53
25.7
101.6
19.3
554.0
651 .1
520.4
3.81
3.86
4.07
14.6
10.6
15.9
2.72
5.78
2.55
14.1
22.3
28.6
720 .4
877.2
669. 1
7.68
6. 13
8.23
1 1 .8
9.5
12.3
31
32
2.51
5.12
23.4
41.6
576.5
863.6
4.51
4,74
14.3
9.4
3,50
8,49
14.9
64,9
541 .0
792,7
2,70
2,46
15.4
9.6
2.56
6.14
23.7
27.9
714.6
971 .8
8.41
6.79
11.7
8.6
SUM 2,64 24,6 57S.S 4.80 14,3
BAG 2.69 25.8 658.6 5,64 12.5
3,48 33,8 502,2 3.76 15.7
4.15 41.3 562. 1 3,78 13.<»
2,64 26,6 677,1 8,12 12,2
3.29 41.6 752.7 6.66 10.7
33
0.50
0.7
114,1
0,04
76,0
1.12
30,4
76,0
0.05
69.6
1.33
1.0
67.7
0.03
120
34
5.59
21.2
1591.8
0.95
5,4
14,42
334.5
906,3
0.54
6.0
4.56
9.5
1U05.5
0.69
6.2
35
1.35
5.0
623.3
0.71
10.6
7.30
165.8
475,1
0.23
11.7
1 .94
4.7
831.5
0.72
10.5
36
1.22
4.3
562.6
0.76
15.5
4.03
93.9
489,6
0.31
13.7
1.43
9.9
673.9
0.87
12.8
37
1.52
5.3
388.9
1.77
22.1
1.60
16.8
414,1
0,69
19.9
0.93
4.2
541.2
2.82
16.1
38
1.92
3.T
406.0
7.23
21.2
1.60
7,8
377.5
2.75
22.5
1.14
3.5
543.7
3.27
16,1
39
2.32
12.5
502,6
3,40
16.8
2.49
13,2
408,0
5,67
20.3
1.37
11.4
626.2
15.94
13,6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1«1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPFNDI X 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
C ID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
031
1973
FORO
LTD
100
035
1973
HAZD
MODE
NO.
HC
CU
C(J2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
1
5.15
161.9
579.6
3.58
10.1
5,09
38.3
368.9
2
1.51
",2
716,5
3.21
10.1
1,10
10,6
613.3
3
9.12
216.0
1003.1
1,13
6.3
6.71
52.7
807.7
1
3.87
92.1
779.5
3.15
9.5
2.18
21.8
973.5
5
1,9b
23,8
588,8
0,29
10.0
1 .36
11.1
392.0
6
1.85
9.0
532,6
«.ll
16.1
1 ,01
8,7
177,6
7
2,32
2".5
610,7
7.J2
13.1
2,16
25.1
393,6
8
2.13
28,1
611.7
7.31
13.3
1.77
31.5
133.8
9
2.15
H.7
612.3
7.80
13.8
1 .59
20.#
382.5
10
2.73
11.1
639,1
8,19
13.3
1.19
13.1
181.1
11
3.«1
69,9
657.6
7.11
11.«
2.86
55,8
121.5
12
3.57
29.3
793.0
8,83
10,1
2.09
32.0
580.3
13
3.92
50.6
775.9
8.91
10.2
3.06
51.0
192.8
11
2.21
11,2
612.1
5,90
13.8
1 .53
22,8
130.2
15
1,70
18.1
620,5
3,19
12.8
1.85
19.1
562,1
16
11.21
209.5
1100.2
1.15
6.1
5.29
61.2
1305.9
17
3.25
76.3
631.8
1.63
11,6
2.02
27.7
176.0
18
2.18
18.2
662.1
6.25
12.7
1 .21
11,8
588,5
19
2.96
55.2
575.6
1.95
13.2
1.10
13.0
537. 1
20
3,16
23,6
606.1
6,78
10.1
1.05
6,1
722, 1
21
3,«7
96,5
717.2
6,7a
9.8
3.91
81,2
192,7
22
3.65
11. 0
711.5
1,11
10.8
2.67
H.7
528.8
23
7,01
121,0
939.1
3,99
7.7
3.19
10,6
739,9
21
2.1''
12,6
626. J
7.72
13,6
1 .19
19.2
160,2
25
1.87
6,7
596,8
«.J2
11.5
1.19
16.6
111.0
26
6,76
11,2
859.8
1,12
9.3
2.17
29.0
780.7
27
2.66
31.9
721.1
7.97
11.3
1.86
27.5
502,7
28
3.23
16,0
669,0
3.67
12,6
1.22
7.8
501.8
29
6.29
110.3
BbS.b
J.62
8.1
2.13
21.6
700.8
30
2.39
11.6
632.8
8,81
13.1
1.57
17.9
167 , 6
31
2.01
9,9
632,6
1,50
13.6
1.39
26.2
151,3
32
6.U7
37.3
880.1
1,56
9.3
2.56
38.9
832. 1
SUM
2.68
30.8
629,9
7.61 :
12.9
1.29
17,8
193.1 ,
BAG
3,0b
39,6
686,7
6,oo :
11.7
1.85
30.3
199.6 1
70
NOX MPG
VEH YEAR MAKL MOOL CIO
0 36 197 3 MFRC MARQ 1129
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1.72 19.9
i.ei 12.6
1.77 9.7
1.37 17.2
2.22 21.2
2,06 17,9
2.20 20,2
2.11 18.2
2.58 21.2
2.76 17.5
2.16 17,1
2.96 13.9
3.u1 15.2
2.5t 18.8
I.60 11.8
2.25 6.3
3.03 16.9
2.30 1u,5
2.91 15.8
3.00 12.1
2.71 13.9
0.62 1«,7
3.03 10.9
2.56 17.9
2.17 18.8
2.03 10,6
3.65 16,1
2.63 17,1
2•bb 11.9
3.00 17.7
1.71 17,9
1.76 9.8
2.17 16.9
1.60 98.2 567.2 6.81 12.1
3,60 12,6 930.<1 1.53 8.8
6.72 119.7 1217.2 0.79 6.0
2.82 63.5 623.0 <1,15 12.1
1.69 23.2 603.? 5,70 13.7
1,60 12,6 610.0 3.63 11,0
3.11 93,0 517,9 U.31 12,6
2.5" 91,0 651.9 3.93 11.0
2.83 15.9 586.3 8,01 13.3
3.17 28.7 681.7 6.21 12.0
5.25 190.1 578.0 5.22 9.9
1.37 95.8 875.9 6.35 8.5
5.51 180.2 710.3 7.16 A.5
3.17 57,9 610.1 1.75 12.5
1,81 62.7 678.2 2,63 11.2
10.99 213.3 1211.6 3.37 5.6
1.10 113.6 610.9 6.37 10.7
2.HI 11.6 716.5 5,02 11.2
3.30 61.0 618.8 6.92 12.2
3. 15 32.6 869.1 6.65 9.5
5.13 258,5 697.6 3.59 7.9
5.12 1«1,5 753.6 S.96 8.V
7,63 161.7 1001,8 7.12 6.9
2.65 32.5 679.2 10.05 12.0
2.66 23.1 633.3 6.H5 13.1
6,69 60,6 1010.8 5.16 7,9
3,69 89.2 7U9.ll 10.11 9.8
3,71 10,8 713.9 6.16 11.2
6.32 112,0 959.U 6.82 7.7
3,39 72.8 681.7 10.56 11.0
2.51
6,36
30.5 692.5
78.1 1013.2
6,10 11.9
5.72 7.7
3,07
3,88
62.3 653.3 6.10 11.7
93.8 731,9 6,71 10.0
33
0.91
30.7
78.9
0,08
68,3
0.16
2.8
79,6
0.02
105
0,72
16.3
113.7
0.12
62.7
31
11.75
391.0
902.3
0,69
5.7
1.23
8.1
1306.1
0.91
6.7
8,01
206.9
1331.1
1.30
5.3
35
1.53
87,0
851.8
0,77
8,8
0,17
2.1
1099.6
0.52
8.0
3,99
109, 1
678.9
0.15
10.3
36
2.95
15.8
600.2
0.72
13.0
0.07
0.7
697,0
0.38
12.7
2.68
72. 1
519.1
0.39
1 J.8
37
1.58
2.7
151.8
1.31
19.1
0.01
1.1
179,7
0.13
18.1
0.78
11.2
520 .1
1.32
16.1
38
1.09
2.9
192.5
2.57
17.7
0.1 1
1.0
186.2
1.62
16.2
1.35
7.1
181,9
1.93
17.7
39
1.77
6.1
573,9
15,11
15.0
0.35
l.«
107. 7
2.16
21.6
2.2"
21.8
579,9
10,08
H.3
t M1 S31 ON RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER HJNUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECriNOMV IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MDDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
- - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - -
- - -
- - - -
WW*
• ••
m m m
m m m -
m m m m
mmmm
mmm
037
1973
OLOS
CUTL
350
038
1973
OLDS
98
055
039
1973
PLYM
FURY
318
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
en
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
3.83
92.9
51 1.5
3.38
13.3
8.32
20.3
712.5
10.10
11.5
0.10
62.6
533.5
6,08
13.8
2
4,06
68,5
735.8
3.20
10.3
6.10
10.8
709.8
8.60
11.3
0.59
52.0
652.0
6,71
1 1.9
J
7.33
131.0
1150.2
3.15
6.0
11.90
37.7
1163.7
9.12
7.0
7.70
112.7
1010.2
7.31
7.3
a
3.62
82.1
618.0
2.12
U.7
0,18
9.0
663.0
9.12
12.8
3.26
38.8
582.2
7.10
1 J.6
5
2.80
37.1
508,7
0,95
15.0
2,18
2.3
597,1
11.08
10,6
2.57
17.9
510.1
11.15
16.2
6
2.72
23.0
066,8
«,31
17.3
1.87
1.3
520.8
7.86
16.7
2.36
10,2
050.8
7,90
18.7
7
3.90
116,5
508,0
5.11
11.9
2.01
30.6
627,0
11.77
12.9
2.61
30.2
500.3
10.99
10.9
S
3.10
03.6
081.1
0.15
15.9
2.01
19.2
633.7
11.87
13.2
2.20
20.9
095.9
9.01
16.6
9
3.03
32.7
501,3
6.68
10.7
2.30
7.8
635,3
10.33
13,6
2.30
10.9
098,2
11.89
16.8
10
3.08
16.8
508.6
5.29
15.1
2.37
0.8
655,6
12.12
11.2
2.60
10.7
507,0
9.99
16.5
11
3.78
68,0
620,8
6.80
11.9
2.93
7.2
727 ,3
17,30
U.9
2.91
"5,2
571,b
9.72
13.6
1?
0.03
28.2
682.2
7.31
12.0
2.80
0.9
866,0
17.92
10.1
3.05
31.0
667.3
11.03
12.2
13
3.99
31.8
706.6
9.90
11.5
3.37
9.5
829.5
20.00
10.0
3,00
08.8
673.5
12.10
11.7
la
2.87
10.1
531,5
5.05
15.8
1.99
3.9
637.8
13.20
13.7
2,56
25.3
080.1
8.12
16.8
15
0.37
19.5
585,8
3.03
lo.l
5,60
7.2
702.0
6.o2
12.1
3.83
37,5
500.5
0,70
15.5
16
9.29
52.7
1276.0
0.18
6.0
13.09
00.3
1321.9
10,60
6.2
8,80
113.2
1025.5
5.09
7.2
17
3.07
35.3
602.3
6,01
12.5
3.32
15.1
631.0
15.50
13.3
3.05
62.2
593.5
8,90
12,6
IS
3.01
25.7
616.0
5.52
13.3
2.59
5.8
713.6
1 1 .08
12.1
3.13
28.6
537.1
7.89
15.0
19
3.19
27.1
591 .9
6,09
13.8
3.08
10.3
590.3
13.33
10.3
3.28
08,9
531.2
7,99
10.0
20
0,01
26.7
718.7
6.30
11.5
1.32
6,8
835.0
12.62
10.o
3.81
37.9
636.1
8.60
12.5
21
0.05
158.8
608.0
5.86
9.7
3,19
09,2
776.3
16,57
10.3
3.85
105,7
627.2
7.60
11.0
22
0,39
58.5
650.5
5.01
11.7
3.03
19.6
803.3
10.97
10.5
3.60
58.8
587.3
7.81
12.8
23
6.62
65.8
896.5
6.90
8.7
6.57
33.7
1000.7
16.91
8.3
5,38
76.5
780.6
10.92
9.7
21
3.08
25.3
508.7
7,90
10,8
1.91
0.0
628.0
10.70
13.9
2.72
35.9
518.7
10.10
15.2
25
2.78
13.1
533.3
5.50
15,8
1.70
3.0
662.3
13,77
13.2
2.57
29.5
066,0
7.07
17.0
26
6.38
28.3
833.1
0,80
9.9
8.01
9.6
937.8
12.05
9.1
5.61
56. 0
706.3
7,76
10.9
27
3.51
00,8
663,3
8,66
1 ?. 0
2.B6
9.0
756.2
19.95
11,0
3.00
63,8
590.2
9.13
12.6
28
3.75
18.2
605,7
5.11
13.7
2.93
0.9
731.8
13.06
11.9
3.36
37,5
529.7
7.90
10.8
29
6,03
58.5
826.1
6.03
9.5
7.27
22.2
881.8
16.60
9.0
5.03
69.3
716.1
9,18
10.6
10
3.03
25.6
570.2
9.02
10.3
2.22
0.7
603.0
16.80
13.5
2,86
06.3
519.1
9.95
10.8
31
2.81
15.5
566.0
5.22
10.8
1.96
3.6
701.0
13.37
12.0
2.72
36.3
096.1
7.81
15.8
32
6.26
32.6
665.9
0.90
9.5
7.76
10,2
972.7
11 .90
8.8
5.66
58,8
736.6
6.70
10.5
SUM
2. 97
27.5
580,8
5.62
io,o
2.57
9.1
656,6
12.30
13,1
2.78
31.9
532.5
9,76
15.0
BAG
3.08
39.6
620,7
6.11
12.7
3.00 •
13,6
707,9
12.77
11.0
3.15
05.2
568.2
8.73
13.7
33
0.56
0.8
118,0
0.22
69.8
1.65
5.6
99,8
0.16
77.9
0.63
10.9
100.8
0.37
70.3
31
6.06
56.3
1362.3
1.38
6.0
22,80
50.8
1211,1
2.12
6.5
6.90
172.0
1118.9
1.76
6.3
35
2.22
15.3
899.5
0.80
9.5
9.20
19.0
770.6
0.80
10.7
2,90
71.5
697.3
0.96
10.8
36
1.38
5.0
670.6
0.78
13.0
0.92
12.9
531.8
0.77
15.6
2.00
01.5
532.0
0,87
10.7
37
1.91
3.7
023.0
2.88
20,0
1.03
3.2
009.3
2.62
19.3
2.13
7.5
392.5
6.83
21.6
38
1.85
3.0
058.8
5.11
18,9
0.96
2.0
095.7
6.93
17.7
1.78
0.3
027.2
10.00
20,2
39
1.60
3.9
512.6
5.77
16.9
0.89
3.3
593.5
13.90
10.8
1 .88
11.0
077,5
13.50
17.7
EMISSION RESULTS
IN GRAMS PER
MILE
(PER MINUTE FOR
IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
listing OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
detrijit
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
010 19 7 3 PL VM FUR* 160
VkH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
0
-------
APPENDIX D.CONT'O
listing OF MODAL results ON INDIVIDUAL vehicles
DETROIT
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
043 1973 TOTO CELI 120
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID
0
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
Yt AR
MAKF
POOL
CIO
VEH
YF AR
make
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
WOOL
CIO
006
1972
Buic
LFSA
350
007
1972
HUIC
CENT
055
008
1972
CMEV
VEGA
100
MODE
NO.
MC
CO
C02 NO*
MPG
HC
cn
Cl)2 NO* MPG
HC
CO
C02
N(l*
MPG
1
2
3
9.09
8.19
1 7.92
202.1
177,1
376.0
006.3 2.56
638.2 3,70
903.5 3.56
U.2
9.0
5.7
0,10
0.03
7.13
81.1
00,9
110.0
558.7 7.10 12.7
852,2 0.58 9.5
1213.1 10.80 6.3
3.61
5.00
10.62
60, 7
83.0
107.7
266.3
618.0
768.2
0.20
0.07
0.50
23.0
1 1.6
9.1
u
5
6
5. 33
3.06
3.12
151,3
66.7
o?.2
611.0
502,7
058,5
3.62
6,79
0.63
10.2
13.5
16,0
3.53
2.62
2,«1
03,7
16.0
10.0
681.8
602.0
576.1
11,39
13.32
8.21
11.7
10,0
10.7
o,05
1 .96
1 ,60
69, 0
53.0
01.7
070,9
171 .5
009.7
0.32
0.19
0.06
10.9
19.2
18.5
7
5.09
100,5
561.3
0.83
11.9
2.75
51.1
625,0
10,33
12.0
2.03
80,0
318,0
0,62
19,6
B
0.50
1 15.9
513.2
5.07
12.5
2,21
35.0
605,9
8,70
13.3
2.38
70. 1
000 ,5
0.67
16,8
9
5.53
73,0
5oo,0
6,23
13.1
2.53
18.9
612.2
13,02
13.7
1.37
50.3
303 .0
0.67
20.8
10
6.22
70.7
509.8
6.23
12.9
2.61
10.2
669.3
10,22
12.7
1 .27
00.5
077 .3
0.76
16.1
1 1
7.09
130.6
620.0
5.17
10.5
2.60
38.2
709,9
13.22
ll.o
3.02
105,0
309.6
O.hl
16.9
12
8.00
93.2
656,8
7.23
10.7
3.37
20,6
825.0
12.18
10,2
3,02
86,0
563.8
O.BO
12.5
13
9. 12
157.0
689.6
6.13
9.2
3.00
08.3
787.7
10,86
10.2
0.65
107.S
000 .9
0.71
13.7
10
5.60
102.1
096.2
5.26
13.2
2.05
26,8
626,0
8,81
13.1
2.51
57.7
387 , b
0.U7
IB.3
15
17.07
1 76.0
009.3
2,65
1 l.o
a,oo
00.0
729.0
6,52
11.0
3.78
38,5
079.5
0,39
16.1
16
02.58
550.6
922.3
3.09
0.6
9.93
117.3
1571.3
8,80
5.0
7.82
60.3
1 132.6
0.70
7.1
1 7
10.81
170,0
5U0.7
0.79
10.5
3.37
66.5
702.2
10.22
10.9
7.21
121.6
360. J
0.58
15.0
IB
7.16
112.9
536.0
0.82
12.1
2.82
33.1
682.2
8 .62
11.9
0,79
88.6
021,6
0.35
15.o
19
9.31
103.6
521 .6
0,60
11.0
2.75
35.3
683.6
10.87
1 1.9
0.07
81.3
303.1
0.52
18.3
20
9.10
137,6
6U0.2
5.29
io.o
3.71
32.5
831.7
11 .62
9.9
0.83
90. 1
500.7
0.0 1
1 1.5
21
16.60
360 .3
570.1
2,05
7.0
3.03
127,3
751 .0
8.03
9.2
8.80
169.3
336.7
0.51
10.1
22 10.82
23 25.38
2
-------
APPENDIX O.CONT'D
LISTING OF M004L RESULTS DN INDIVIDUAL VFHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
HODL
C1D
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MUDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MUDL
CID
049
1972
CHEV
NOVA
250
050
1972
CHEV
MALI
307
051
1972
CHEV
STAW
350
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
MO*
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
MPG
1
1.80
29.6
378.5
1.79
20.6
5.24
25.9
506, 3
3.97
15.7
1.52
71.2
938.3
8.54
8.3
2
1.56
15.9
691.1
3.33
12.3
4.19
28.1
718.0
2,61
11.4
1,06
56.5
625,4
3.15
12.2
3
1.01
12.6
938.5
3.35
8.7
7.63
44.3
973, 1
3.24
8.3
6.95
81.5
1133.3
1.91
6.9
<1
0.99
10.3
551.2
2.23
15.5
3,03
18.5
588.0
2.50
14.2
2.64
36.7
634,3
1.61
12.7
5
0.53
1.9
482,0
2.68
18,1
1.92
12.1
515,0
3,19
16.4
1.96
2". 3
556.2
6,99
14.8
6
0.15
3.5
468.5
2.50
18.7
2.08
13.7
430, 1
1.57
19.4
2.17
26.2
494 , 0
6.97
16.4
7
1.87
9.9
168,4
5.07
18,2
3,63
72.3
493.5
3.75
14.3
2.77
93.7
556.0
6.78
12.5
8
0.72
10.4
489,8
4.40
17.5
2.55
34.5
448.5
6.05
17.4
2.30
66,5
563.1
6.39
13.2
9
0,87
6.3
461.2
1,69
18,7
2.81
27.2
471.6
6.14
17.0
2,41
62.6
546.3
8.45
13,6
10
0.87
6.6
527,6
4.38
16,4
2.85
20.0
471,8
6.65
17.3
2.53
45,3
574.7
9.83
13,6
11
1.19
12.3
506.7
6.70
16.8
3.58
70.8
437,5
3.96
15.8
3.14
123,3
611.1
6.31
10.9
12
1.04
7.8
654.6
6.15
13.2
3.68
40.2
585,4
5.98
13.4
3.04
73.5
748.8
9.90
10.2
13
1 .<>5
17.2
583.0
8.91
11.4
1.37
96.0
564,0
4,28
12.2
3.24
106,6
740.9
9,20
9.7
14
0.81
6.2
485.6
4.53
17,8
2.90
37.0
460.3
4.01
16.8
2.20
51.2
535.9
7.27
14.2
15
2.72
23.1
523.2
2.97
15.6
5. #9
"3,7
480,5
3.40
15.7
3,01
43,6
591.3
5,01
13.3
16
6.30
103,5
1097.7
1.15
6.9
12,05
121.2
1058,2
4.02
6,9
7,86
121,0
1316.7
6,18
5.8
17
1.50
32.7
460,8
4.70
16,5
3,50
52.0
523.8
4,70
14,4
2.72
40,4
657.5
9.21
12.2
18
0.85
11.5
543,9
3,93
15.7
2,86
35.4
576.7
3,61
13.8
2.42
36,6
653.7
7,28
12.3
19
1.19
18.1
479.6
1.97
17.3
3.24
42.6
514,3
3.97
15.0
2.28
32,6
588.9
7.72
13.7
20
1.05
11.0
639,6
4.91
13.3
3,90
44.9
646,5
4.25
12.2
3.41
90.8
752.5
7.18
9.8
21
1.78
18.3
503,5
7.06
11.2
4,69
138.8
523,4
3.09
11.7
3.90
175.1
715.0
6.14
fl.9
22
1.57
22,6
601.3
5.67
13.8
3,96
67.6
600,7
4,39
12.3
2.99
86.3
685.7
6,79
10,7
23
3.56
63,4
712.5
6,17
10.8
6,16
76.8
735,5
5.1«
10.1
4,08
70.3
991 .4
10.66
8,0
2
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LI ST INI. fiF W1DAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETRUIT
VEH
YEAS
MAKE
MUDL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
HODL
CID
VEH
YEAH
MAKE
hiiul
CID
...
....
....
....
...
....
....
...
...
....
....
....
...
052
1972
ChEv
IMPA
ssc
053
10 7?
CHEV
STAW
350
051
1972
CHE v
CAPR
100
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
MUX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
a.65
59.0
698.7
5.86
1 1.0
3.27
86.5
315.0
3.35
18.1
1.22
72.8
592. 1
5.15
12.3
2
1.16
38,5
782.7
3.99
10.1
2,70
32.0
611.1
6,01
13.2
3,01
52.5
775.5
3.88
10.2
3
5.90
17.2
1110.7
".12
7.1
7.IB
116.6
783.5
1,90
8.6
5.82
69.6
1182.3
1,01
6.8
a
2.61
16.7
636,0
3.11
13.2
2,86
15.5
515.8
5.68
11.9
2.29
36,7
650.0
3.69
12.1
5
1,01
6.7
572.1
a.98
11.9
1 ,18
7.8
198.2
6.77
17.2
1 .68
11.2
579.6
6,31
1 1.6
6
1.07
1 1.6
511,6
1.98
16.3
1.2«
2.B
113.1
5.22
19.7
1.50
13.7
511.3
5.88
16.5
7
1.96
28.7
552.6
1.80
1«.7
2.37
38.7
555.1
7.87
11.2
2,99
51.0
596.5
6.98
12.8
8
1 .98
63.9
588.5
3.91
12.8
1 .61
19.6
189,8
7.12
16.9
2,11
61,0
537.8
7. 58
1 3, 7
9
2.82
38.3
535.0
6,30
11.7
2.23
18.9
522,1
8.10
15.9
2.51
33.6
578.3
9.62
1 5.9
10
2.56
37.3
582.9
5.89
13.7
2.07
9.9
516.0
7.33
16.5
2.57
36,0
591.9
8.61
1 5.5
1 1
2.16
12,2
612.1
7.18
12.9
2.87
31.0
611,8
9.98
13.1
3.26
61 . 3
635.9
8.36
1 2.0
12
2.61
50 .8
758.8
6,80
10.5
2.68
17.0
626.5
9.59
13.1
3.13
63.1
765.5
9.ni)
10.1
13 2.60 53.7 725.0 8.25 10.9
111 1,8ft 10,9 575. 1 5, 12 13.8
15 2.5? 32.0 595.6 3.7a 13.6
16 6.73 117.5 lia?.1 1,79 6.6
17 2,1" 50.5 599.J 6,59 12,9
18 1.9a 32.7 653.0 u,77 12.5
19 1.96 36.2 596.9 5.81 13.a
20 2.06 O0.9 789.6 5.22 10.3
21 5.20 125, 1 673.« 1,12 10.1
22 2.91 92.7 712.0 U.56 10.2
23 3.73 86.8 927.« 6.21 8.3
21 1.99 39,9 590.8 5.76 13.1
25 2.07 aa.a 562.9 6.02 13.9
26 3.97 59.8 831,9 5.21 9.5
27 2.50 59.1 668.3 ft.23 11.5
28 2.28 10.0 652.1 5.72 12.3
29 3.21 71.0 861.0 7.23 9.0
30 2.36 15.2 613.0 6.09 12.8
31 2.39 72,1 587.3 5.99 12.5
32 fl.1i 95.1 887.1 5,51 8.1
J.«2 36.3 652.0 12.13 12.3
1.70 8.5 199.2 7.52 17.1
1.91 31.7 190.5 1.52 15.8
12.52 159.7 959.2 5.18 7.1
3.36 19,0 519.7 8.75 13,9
1.83 11.0 521,7 6.85 16.3
2.99 31,1 570.8 8,11 11.0
2.67 9.1 609,1 8.01 11.0
3,60 87,9 599,1 8.70 11.9
2.68 38.3 593.6 8.03 13.1
6.52 89.9 752.2 10.18 9.7
1.73 8.8 533.8 9.82 16.0
1.36 1,8 198,1 7,61 17,1
5.35 28.3 733.2 6.93 11.2
2.57 25.1 595.8 11.67 13.8
2.70 8.6 559,9 8.33 15.3
6.51 71.8 709,2 10.69 10.5
1.82 7.5 59b.3 11.30 11.5
1.60 1.6 178.0 7.99 18.1
5.18 30.1 671,8 7.50 12.0
3.73 75.7 617.2 9.33 11.1
2. 39 51 .0 193.'' 7.20 15.J
3.26 55.0 609.3 1.57 12.6
2.66 169.0 1284,0 5.32 5,7
3.16 71.1 636.3 7.50 11,7
2.38 13.3 623.1 1.77 12.7
2.93 51.5 618.9 6.56 12.i
3.91 63,1 709,2 a,AO 111.8
a.90 120,8 651,S 5.98 10,1
3.59 108.6 685.5 S.17 10,2
5.06 131,8 880.1 6.12 8.0
2,51 15.6 572.1 7.37 13.b
2.15 19.7 519.6 6.31 11.0
1,98 86,6 821.1 6.1b 9.1
3.11 78.9 672,1 6.76 11,0
3.20 68,1 596.1 6.52 12."
1,71 106.7 789.3 5.51 «.I
2.80 57.5 517.9 6.50 lu.1
2.85 71.3 193,5 7.21 la.a
5.18 102.1 837.9 6,15 8.7
SUM 2.13 33.7 591.1 5.63 13.6
HAG 2,52 58.5 650.3 5,10 11.8
2.03 23.2 531.1 7.65 15,5
2. 77 30.1 566.2 8. 19 H.J
2.52 13.7 582.9 7.la 13.5
2.83 68.1 628.8 6.6a 11,9
33
0.60
7.7
93.1
0.11
82.9
0.7a
21.2
59.5
0,18
88,9
0.62
13.6
B8.3
0.12
79.5
31
6.57
111.9
1110.6
0.88
6,8
9.90
271.1
683.1
0,81
7.7
7. 10
135.6
1092.0
1.27
6.7
35
2.21
25.2
916.8
1 .05
9.2
1.81
121.1
651.5
0.66
10.3
1.81
20.3
938.5
0.98
9.1
36
1 .67
15.2
599.6
0.80
11.1
3.02
71.8
153,8
O.ab
15.3
1.19
16.1
579.1
0.h9
11.6
37
1.11
2.6
395,9
2.12
21.9
0.86
3.7
122.5
2.52
20.6
1.12
2.a
aio.n
2.38
21.3
38
1.79
10.9
131.8
a.93
19,1
0 .69
3.1
157.0
5.62
19.1
0.93
3.a
116,8
5.a2
I'.i
39
0.89
5.2
538.9
7.21
16,1
0.75
5.6
183.9
8.73
17.9
1 .71
la.5
512,3
11.31
15.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PfR MILE (PER MJNUTF FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY In MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUMF A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX O.CDNT'O
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
MODE
VEH YEAR
055 1972
MAKE MODL CIO
DATS 3EDA 97
DFTROIT
Vfc H YEAR MAKE MODL CIO
056 1972 OOOG OART 318
VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CIO
057 1972 DODS POLA 360
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NDX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
5.23
3.77
ft.64
79.5
49.7
102.3
154.0
346.3
429.1
2.21
1.12
2.45
10.0
20.3
14.4
4. 14
3,61
6.75
72.1
32.1
93.6
390,1
619,9
516.9
4,81
5.03
5.14
17.2
13.0
12.9
4.39
4.30
7.54
83.5
67. 1
143.6
565.4
591 .5
926.2
5.19
4.47
4.68
12.5
12.5
7.5
a
5
6
2.72
1 .60
1.45
46.0
11.3
5.2
304. 1
307.3
270,6
2.80
5.24
5.56
23.0
26.9
ll.J
2.79
1 .89
I.«2
29.7
14.2
15.1
507.4
454.9
474,7
4.82
6.71
5.37
15,8
18.4
17,6
3.44
2,56
2.38
65,9
32.3
22.2
562.2
501 .2
437 .4
5.63
6.95
5.00
li.l
15.8
18.5
7
e
4
2.5b
2.40
2.19
35.9
22.2
18.6
137.1
299.9
317.2
5.911
5.74
7.25
22.1
25.9
25.1
2.51
2.07
2.38
22.1
17.8
18.0
496,5
419.0
423.7
7.28
5.58
6.73
16.5
19.6
19.3
3,26
2.82
2.94
79.8
54.4
32.7
536.3
486.8
552.1
6.29
6.26
8.99
13.2
15.3
14.S
10
11
12
1.83
2.49
2.21
12.5
70.2
30.6
304.9
336.2
369.8
7.46
4.71
1.91
26.9
19.5
20.9
2.51
2.73
2.97
15,6
26.5
19,8
440.4
490,4
549.6
5.83
8.19
7.92
18.8
16.4
15.0
3.16
3,18
3.71
29.1
46,4
36,8
530.7
637.9
713.8
7.80
10.44
10.22
15.1
12.1
11.1
11
14
15
3.08
1,70
3.08
63.1
22.1
34.6
361.3
279.9
274.5
7.01
6.02
1.65
18.9
27,7
26.2
3.16
2.20
4.67
31 .6
11.2
24.3
560.1
408. 1
492.5
9,95
5.65
3.93
14.3
20.4
16.3
3,96
2.75
4,90
41.9
26,5
53.1
691 .3
516.7
504.9
11.32
7.29
4.13
11.5
15.7
14.7
16
17
18
fl.95
3.34
2.11
108.3
70.3
26,5
470.8
280.0
312.8
1.75
1.27
5.57
13.3
22.1
24.6
10.37
1.13
2.60
70.5
38.5
19.7
1018,4
496,9
518.7
5.45
7.38
6.46
7.6
15.6
15.4
10.62
3.47
3.24
186.5
63,6
44.6
990. 4
482.9
568.8
5.05
6.58
6.37
6.7
14.9
13.7
19
20
21
3.00
2.61
3.96
32.1
17.2
79,4
307.8
373.6
378.9
6.59
7.14
6,18
24.1
21.7
17.2
3.20
3,65
1.41
30.0
25.0
58,4
499.2
610.4
564,a
6.62
7.16
7.72
15.9
13.0
13.3
3,49
4,07
3.70
65,0
53.7
93,0
465. 1
668.2
622.6
6,43
7.13
8.12
15.3
1 1.6
11.4
22
23
24
3.24
5.91
1.73
37.9
86.6
16.6
354.9
434.5
324.4
6,81
6.44
6.77
20.9
15.1
24.9
3.32
5.96
2.26
36.0
72.1
20.0
507.9
689,4
470.3
6.15
9.14
8.36
15.4
10.8
17.4
3,90
6,60
2.76
53.2
97.9
39,6
639.2
789.4
521.1
8.09
9.57
8.37
12.1
9.2
15.0
25
26
27
1.40
3.77
2.53
9.0
35.8
42.9
301.5
414.2
351.5
6,46
6.12
8,62
27.7
18.4
20.8
2.U
6.23
2.98
14.2
27.6
31.0
413.4
702.4
514,1
5.78
6.07
9.37
20.1
11.6
15.5
2.65
7.04
3.32
29.3
75.2
56.4
521.5
731.6
577.2
7.23
6.11
9.02
15.4
10.2
13.1
26
29
30
1.80
4.27
1.79
17.J
63.8
27.2
320.0
412.9
348.4
7.08
6.82
7.51
25.2
16,9
22.4
2.99
5.33
2.17
19,4
51.7
19.7
469.4
599.9
488,7
6.33
8,39
9.33
17.4
12.7
16.8
3.93
6,35
2.79
42.0
91.4
45.8
561 .2
656.5
509.1
7.15
7.22
7,87
13.9
10.8
15.0
31
32
1 .46
3.52
17.8
37,4
295,5
407,8
5,62
4,98
27.1
18.6
2.26
5,70
16.4
34.3
361.9
721.5
5.90
6.23
22.5
11.2
2.74
6,97
37.1
64.3
551.2
750.2
7.80
6.27
14.4
9.8
SUM
BAG
1 .99
2.18
24.6
33.4
119.8
334,7
5.98 2fl.J
6.41 22.5
2.21 20.0 476.3 6.27 17.2
2.92 27.7 506.5 6.91 15.9
1.05 44.J 5««.9 7.20 14,2
1.46 54.a 589,9 7.39 12.9
33
0.85
14,9
24.9
0,05
173
0.40
10,4
74,3
0.01
96,6
0.62
14.4
79.2
0.26
65.5
34
7,49
202,3
429.6
0,95
11.5
5,96
120,1
1049,3
2.43
7.1
4.92
158.4
1101.0
0.79
6.5
35
3.02
83.0
311,3
0,40
19,7
1.14
12.7
835,6
0.40
10.3
3,51
129,5
684.9
0.47
9.9
36
1.61
18.8
304,3
0,90
26,2
1.29
11.5
633,8
1.11
13.5
2.73
101.0
489,8
0.35
13.5
37
1.09
2.2
278.7
3.33
31.1
0,76
1.2
431.0
2.03
20.2
2.14
26.1
416.8
2.46
19.1
38
0.98
1.8
282.0
fc.27
30.6
1,01
5,8
371,5
0.18
23.1
2.40
30.6
513.6
6.67
15.6
39
0.75
2.0
309, 1
7.19
20.2
1.15
7.6
407.3
7.23
21.0
2.08
21.8
481.4
8.44
16.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE}
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3 '0
-------
APPEND!* D.CCNT'O
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH YEAR MAKE MIIDL CID
058 1972 FORO PINT 122
VtH YFAR MAKE MODL CID
059 1972 FORD TORI J02
VEH YEAR MAKF MnDL CID
060 1972 FORD LTD 351
MOOE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
Cf)2
Nil* MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
I 1
12
11
II
IS
lb
17
18
19
20
21
22
21
2«
25
26
27
28
29
30
SI
12
1.06
2.98
5.19
IS."
26.0
51.7
1.69 17.3
0.91 7.4
0.78 6.1
1.26
1 .09
1 .15
1.01
1 .78
1 .59
2.06
1 .09
2.80
6.56
1.99
1.21
1 .44
1 .15
2.0 J
1 .7U
1.08
1 .02
0.75
1.80
1 .82
1.11
?.1«
0.89
0,79
1.11
10.5
13.5
15.9
9.2
11.9
20.6
11.6
15.8
16.1
<16.2
12.8
12.8
in,a
11.5
15.5
22.6
"1.7
16.<1
12.5
21.7
19.il
18.6
17.8
20.6
15.0
25.2
269.5
118.2
581.6
355.3
394.6
377 . 4
111 .«
319.9
297.5
325.9
133.5
3911.8
171,1
101.6
319,a
658.1
350.6
389.0
361.1
"51 .5
372.1
372.0
<469.8
322.3
305.2
498.8
515.6
313.6
418,6
336.4
318,8
<186. 3
2.DO 26.B
2.00 17.8
2.57 13.0
2,71 22,8
3,51 21.7
2.23 22.8
U.67 25.2
3.01 25.8
3.56 27.2
2,65 25.8
1.77 22.8
3.73 20.5
5.<12 19.9
2.67 26.7
1.92 21.8
2.59 11.8
4.21 21.7
2.84 21,5
1.70 22.9
1.27 18.6
6.69 20.4
1.70 21.5
5.48 16.1
1.94 25.1
2.57 27,1
2.59 16.1
4.87 15.2
2.56 25,6
4.56 18.3
4.53 ?1.9
2.88 25,7
2,81 16.6
3.10
2.85
4,81
2.17
1.71
1.91
2.56
2.11
2.47
2."7
2.59
1.12
1.29
2.19
2.71
6.50
2.79
2.47
2.41
2.92
1.51
1.22
4.75
2.10
2.22
4.21
2.78
2.72
4.18
2. 37
2.46
4.81
14.6 477.9 5.15 17,4
15.8 753,5 4.21 11.1
29.1 1086.7 4.45 7.7
11.4 581.8 4.06 14,6
7.7 512.2 6.26 16.8
12.2 46B.7 5.03 18,0
38.6 518,1 6,18 15.1
31.6 477,3 1.93 16.6
20.7 511.0 7.25 16.1
15.5 541.2 5.91 15.5
15.1 562,7 9,51 14.9
20.1 642.4 7,15 13.0
24.8 618.1 10,24 11,3
16.2 506,4 5,59 16,5
16,0 622,7 3.39 11.5
17.2 1232.9
20.8 554.0
16,1 563.0
4.79 6.8
8.47 14.9
5.47 14,9
11.9 507.1 7.25 16.5
13.9 674.1 6.93 12.6
87.0 561,1 6,24 12.2
39.5
31.5
10.3
11 .6
17.3
20.4
16.5
21.6
11.0
12.0
20.1
655,8
829.5
510.5
502.4
878.7
584.7
5.15 12.2
7,40 9.9
8.93 16,6
6.67 16,8
5.80 9.7
9.73 14.2
601,3 6.39 14,0
778.5 6.91 10,7
518.6 10.03 16,3
28.44 138,9
33.54 165.1
59.62 294,5
29.65 158.5
22,68 116,8
22,16 122.5
26.46 149,8
25.75 160,9
25.55 130.6
513.8
620.1
982.9
574,4
448.6
4)0.0
462.7
441.2
411.1
3.60 10.5
2.31 9.0
2.47 5.4
1.85 9.7
2.02 12.6
1.84 1S.2
2.44 11,1
2.15 11,4
2.97 12.u
30.21 159.1 470,7 2,41 JO.9
12.15 180.5 472.1 2.57 10.1
19.02 211.9 592.1 2.76 8.5
534,6
898.9
7.19 15.8
6.82 9.4
19.22 225.1
11,13 169,5
41,18 171.8
94.42 356.5
14,41 189.4
12,15 173.2
11.06 150.1
18.60 191.4
17.28 219.8
40.90 211.0
58.89 272.8
27.80 141,5
10.10 168.1
60,02 251.4
11.11 162.9
16.95 168.1
51.82 211.2
28.22 117.7
11,84 186,2
62,50 281.1
572.1
440.5
464,5
989,9
495.1
495,9
508.2
SB4. 7
554.5
579.5
756.1
436.4
448.6
699.2
567,1
530.0
702.6
446.6
497.7
725.9
1.10 8.4
2.06 11.0
1.31 10.1
1.95 4.8
2.57 9.8
2.01 10,2
1.15 10.5
2.83 8.8
2.87 8.5
2.46 8.1
3.50 6.5
2.27 11,9
2.17 11.0
2.16 6.9
3.79 9,6
3.00 9.7
2.86 7.2
2.71 11.8
2.19 10.0
2.48 6.5
SUM 0.98 15.0 354,9
HAG 1.40 20.9 358.1
3.11 21.1
3.40 22.4
2.47 16.1 539.9 7.26 15.5
2.66 21,9 588,8 7,70 14,1
29,58 151,9 477.5 2.12 10.9
34.19 183.5 526.5 2.60 9.6
11
0.25
6.0
54.5
0.09
117
0,41
0.8
107.9
0.28
80.1
4.16
19.7
83.6
0,07
69.4
14
2.49
70.1
591.2
0.51
12.5
4,24
5.7
1249,7
1.61
7.0
46.55
245.2
1003.5
0,76
5.8
15
0.12
6.2
725.6
0,50
12. 1
2.06
4.2
657,5
0.76
11.2
27.53
151.1
572.5
0.41
9,9
16
0.17
1.8
446.2
0.11
19.6
1.17
1.0
529,4
0,76
16.5
27.06
118.2
597. 3
0.60
10.2
17
0.09
2.1
345.9
0.60
25.4
1.42
2.4
192.1
2.46
22.2
18,64
82,0
152,1
0.75
16.4
38
0.16
1.6
286.6
1.50
10.1
2.01
4.8
421.9
7.85
20.1
21 .07
1 11.6
3"6.2
1.51
15.0
39
0.12
2.1
107.4
1.12
28.5
2.22
12,0
475.1
10.17
17.7
23.17
126. 1
405.7
2,66
11.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY in MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3.51
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEM YEAR MAKE MODL CID VEH YEAR MAKE MODL CID VEH YEAR MAKE MUDL CIO
061 1972 FORD GALA 351 062 1972 FORD STAW 000 061 1972 FORD THUN 429
MOOE
NO. HC CO C02 NOX MPG HC CO C02 NflX MPG HC CO C02 NOX MPG
1
2
3
a .99
5,09
8,42
104.2
85,4
198.8
461 .0
682, 1
982.4
2.65
3.17
3.09
13.9
10,6
6.7
4.22
4.01
6.26
67.1
48.9
103.7
640, 0
767.8
1 160,3
1 .06
6.98
5.14
11.7
10.1
6.6
3.92
4,45
6.33
30.1
43,0
37,9
457.2
801 .8
1101.3
5.43
6,26
9.62
17.2
10.0
7.5
u
5
6
3.39
2.28
2.«1
83,4
49,6
38,9
603.3
462.4
430,6
2.16
4.16
3.60
11.9
16.2
17,8
2.93
1,98
1.94
41.8
17.3
1«.7
598,7
557,0
507,9
2.78
4.45
7,89
13.2
15.0
15.4
2.92
2.35
2.13
14.9
17.6
12.9
600,6
540.2
526.0
7.45
9.61
7,18
14.0
15.4
16,0
7
e
9
2.69
2,84
3.24
89.5
62.4
47,9
328.4
510.0
474.3
5.01
5.91
7.88
16.6
14.4
15.9
2.24
2.47
2.57
61.0
45.6
31.2
596,6
610,0
604.6
3.99
6.36
5.64
12.7
12.9
13.4
3.65
2.69
3.18
63.9
73.3
46.9
523.4
532.9
523.6
6.40
8.16
9,74
14,0
13.5
14.6
10
11
12
3.71
3.24
4,58
50.0
59.1
70.7
544.8
560,3
669.1
6,54
9,70
8.41
14.0
13,0
11.2
2.98
2,60
3.46
29.6
40.7
36.2
651 .7
681.0
816.5
10.48
4.90
12.85
12.5
11.8
10.0
3.22
4.69
4.72
41.5
1 36.3
94,2
610.7
523.5
733.6
10.86
5.07
12.33
12.9
11.8
9.9
13
l«
15
4.30
3,28
5.60
60.7
54.3
7«.0
577.9
522.8
563.8
8.97
5.36
3.36
12.4
14.3
12.7
3.25
2.44
3,64
51.2
26.4
41.1
762.2
607,7
656.1
6.60
8.89
3,47
10.u
13.5
12.1
5. 17
3.46
5.39
143.3
69,9
52,1
628.4
562.6
647.3
7,00
9.13
6,73
10.2
13.0
11.9
16
17
18
11.95
3.74
3.43
200.6
94.4
69.5
1177.6
485.7
523.0
4.49
1.51
4.14
5.6
13.7
13.8
8.56
2.68
2.54
129.2
63. 3
34.7
1363.1
583.5
639.6
7.48
3.35
8.72
5.6
12.8
12.6
11.46
3.66
3.37
65.3
54.4
36.3
1354.3
578.5
628,2
9.89
9,03
9.90
5.6
13.1
12.8
19
20
21
3.24
4.35
3.78
73.6
62.4
110.4
445.4
616.6
577.8
4,67
5.«5
7.31
15.5
11.7
11.6
2.55
2.91
2.68
52.8
36.3
97.3
575,2
759.4
771.8
3.55
9.83
4.15
13.3
10.7
9.5
3,81
0.50
0.60
66.3
76.9
159.0
536.4
721.3
546.5
5.56
H.90
5.23
13.6
10.0
10,9
22
23
24
4.29
7.25
2.74
79.4
136.7
57.4
608.0
766.0
480.2
6,33
5.08
5.97
11.9
8.8
15.3
3.63
5.70
2.06
60. 1
101.5
27.5
756,5
916.8
591.3
9.16
6,02
4,94
10.3
8.1
13.8
4, 34
6,58
2.99
107. 1
69.0
50,6
712.1
883.4
542.1
11.51
14.30
9.35
9.9
8,6
1«.1
25
26
27
2.98
7.57
3.42
51,8
100.7
68,2
479.0
752.5
579.6
5.24
0.62
8.27
15.4
9.4
12.7
2.13
5.72
2.61
23.3
52.7
48. 4
622.8
958.5
715.8
9.94
8.8S
5.58
13.3
8.4
11.1
2,84
6. 76
4.18
«5.3
58.0
111.2
591 .4
965.6
406.4
10.65
11.26
8.77
13.2
8.2
10.9
20
29
30
4.23
7.62
2.97
60,5
122,1
56,5
500.7
723.1
542.0
4.98
«.62
7.17
14.6
9.5
13.9
2.88
4.78
2.07
33.7
89.5
35.3
682.1
839.6
556,1
9.96
5.27
4.93
11.9
6.9
10,4
3.89
5.67
3.62
66. 1
45, 1
85.1
691 .5
828.2
530.3
10.92
13.09
6.73
11.0
9.7
13.1
31
32
3.15
7.54
51.9
95.3
473.7
792.8
5.1«
4.87
15.7
9.2
2.27
5.47
34,0
65.5
638,9
969.6
9,73
9.25
12.7
6.1
3.17
6.59
84,2
94.6
582.3
929.8
9,39
9,70
12.2
8.1
SUM
BAG
J.26
3.71
58.2
69.2
517,1
567.5
5.62 14.3
6.62 12.9
2.17
2,81
37.<1
#5.1
633.5
71
-------
APPENDIX 0 * CUNT 10
LISTING OF MO0*L RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH YEAR MAKE MQDL CID
060 1972 LINC CONT 060
VEH TEAR MAKE MODL CID
065 1972 MERC HUNT O00
VEH YEAH MAKf MQDL CID
066 1972 flLDS CUTL 350
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
N()X
MPG
HC
CU
C02 NO*
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1 a.26 130.1 5oo.i
2 6.05 209.0 681.5
3 8.69 255.0 1073,6
0 3.»6 155.3 552.9
5 3.50 182.6 050,0
6 3.96 201.3 «21.6
7 3.96 200.3 350.1
8 0.59 251.7 067,7
9 3.32 238.1 061.0
10 6.12 265,0 076.8
11 5.26 208.2 525.6
12 7.uo J5«.3 619.7
13 6.08 307.5 580,0
10 5.55 266.9 056.0
15 7.65 218,3 570,8
16 15.60 JOO.O 1277.2
17 5.32 203.3 503.9
18 5.71 287.8 510.1
19
20
21
22
23
20
25
5.15 229.2 099,5
7.20 308.6 625.6
5,28 292.0 586,0
6.98 332.5 602.8
9.53 306.3 773.8
0.63 256.5 053.9
1.10 11.6
1.32 8.1
1.99 5.9
1.32 11.0
1.00 11.9
1.18 11.8
2.22 13,1
1.50 10.1
1.62 10.5
1.30 9.7
1,67 9.5
1.59 7.0
1.80 8.2
1.16 9.9
1.27 9.0
2.00 0,8
1.06 9.8
1.22 9.0
1.11 10.1
1.30 7.0
2.03 8.3
1.62 7.7
1.75 6.6
1.23 10.2
0.0? 21.0 918.7 5.01 9.2
3.66 7.1 620.9 5.50 13.8
6.56 05.6 1151.0 6.23 7.1
2,76 16.1 688.3 3.09 12,3
1.92 1?,0 663.7 0.09 12,9
1.67 0.9 001.3 6.00 19.5
2.39 135.0 779.9 6.38 8.9
1 .03 0 0.7 521.0 7.71 15,0
1.00 37.2 715.3 8.38 11.0
2.02 10,9 520.2 9,02 16.0
2.76 53,2 958,3 8.39 9.3
2.70 19,0 630.3 10.81 13.3
3.07 51.7 558.7 2.77 13.7
0.20 56.0 598.3 2.76 12.7
6.81 90.2 989.1 2.00 7.7
2.79 02.8
2.35 25.5
2.62 21.0
3.30 35.1
2,88 25.0
3,08 23.8
3,50 19,1
3,20 22,0
3.95 21,2
537.5 2.60 10,5
030.1 6.03 18.6
016.0 0,70 19,0
099.5 8.85 15.7
080.9 6,22 16.6
083.2 9.53 16.7
520,5 8.18 15.«
562.0 10,61 10,6
637.9 9.98 13.0
3.19 70.0 960.5
2.18 20.9 O90.1
0.03 20,8 095.5
9.27 77,2 1001.2
2.83 35.5 902.8
2.17 11.9 080.6
2.60 J2.6 869.0
2.75 17,2 578.6
3.09 176,1 997.6
3,26 01.2 577.5
6.10 70.2 1068.0
2.07 29,1 783.1
9.73 8.2
6,83 16.7
5.26 16.2
8.15 7.7
7.02 9.2
7.03 17,5
6.92 9,6
8,15 10,0
6.80 6.9
9.99 13.6
7.00 7.0
8.55 10.6
3.78 26,5 656.7 12,09 12.5
2.86 17.6 085.2 7.20 17.0
5.28 36,8 512,1 0.32 15,1
11,05 102.5 1171.0 5.00 6.5
3.38 36.2 505.0 6.89 10.5
3.02 31.6 538.2 6.11 |u,8
3.20 35.0 501.2 5.90 15.7
0.30 02.8 617.0 6.00 12.7
0.20 85.0 598.6 7,57 11,9
0.15 02.5
6,09 68.2
2,56 28,9
595.1 8.07 13.1
802.0 7.36 9.5
081.1 9.30 16.6
5.27 283.8 052.0 1,11 9,7
1.78 10.7 073,0 9,76 17.9
2.81 20.9 OHI.O 6.99 17.0
26
10,60 296,9
805,9
1 .66
6,8
5.37
25.8
703.1
5,08
11.7
7.32
56,7
730,5
5.83 10,5
27
5.68 300.0
525.0
1.37
8.7
2.26
20,0
952.7
9.90
8.9
3.35
33.9
566.3
10.28 10,1
28
6.95 310,7
527.5
1.21
8.6
2.38
11.0
518.7
9.93
16.3
3,89
20.8
555.6
7.18 10.6
29
8.00 312.5
699.2
1.35
7.3
0.79
39.3
980. 1
8,60
8.0
6.01
57.3
765.5
6.95 10,1
30
0.63 258,5
062.8
1 .16
10,0
2.00
38.5
826.0
8.32
9.9
2,96
29.9
521.2
10,09 15,0
31
5.05 303.9
073.2
1.17
9.2
1.95
13.8
086.7
9,70
17.2
2,83
22."
078,9
6,79 17.0
32
10.91 330,0
808.3
1 .66
6.5
5.02
2".3
707.8
9.58
11.1
7.07
51.2
760,2
6,53 10,3
SUM
0.95 200.0
505.0
CD
9.9
2.17
26.9
656.0
8.53
12.6
2.99
26.5
520.5
7.02 15.5
BAG
5.79 280,2
509.8
1 .00
8.7
2,68
38.0
707,6
9.35
11."
3.57
30.6
569,7
7.80 10.1
33
0,58 10,6
1 15.2
0.11
63.0
0.73
9.1
92.9
0.15
81,0
0.17
7.9
112.2
0.00 70,8
30
6.03 130.5
1302.3
0.92
5.6
8.10
81,6
1107,8
1.69
7.0
5.78
80.6
1065,0
0.73 5.5
35
3.13 65.9
69
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
WOOL
CID
VEH
year
MAKE
MODL
CID
VEH
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
- - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - -
• •••
mmm
- - -
mmmm
mmmm
...
067
1972
olds
98
455
068
1972
OPEL
SEDA
116
069
1972
PLYM
VAL I
225
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2.21
26,5
745.1
2,68
11.2
2.61
27.3
318,0
3.42
24.0
3.t6
82.6
311.6
0.57
19.6
2
2.2"
l'.l
837.0
5.14
10.2
2.71
28,7
405.5
".25
19.3
3.41
64,6
380.8
4.71
18.0
3
3.05
20,4
1311.6
4,91
6.6
1.21
32.2
521,9
3.35
15.2
5.84
131.2
540.9
5.12
11.6
4
1,1'
5.7
760.5
2.80
ll.S
1.77
9.1
307.1
4,60
27.1
2.05
53.8
324.3
6.32
21.3
5
1,06
9.2
630.0
5.31
13.7
1.46
3.5
300,5
6,44
28,6
1,63
31.9
318,1
7.64
23.8
6
1.12
«.5
554.7
6,92
15.7
1 .46
25.5
295.9
4,44
26,1
1.57
25.1
275,8
5.42
27.7
7
2.35
119,7
431.0
5.29
14.2
2.13
23.3
284,2
0.37
27.1
1 ,83
51.0
337,6
7.14
21.0
a
2,01
62,5
589.1
9.08
12,8
2.20
91.3
296,8
3,97
19.8
1.54
34,9
283.1
5.57
25.9
9
2.25
39.4
602.7
8.18
13.2
1.97
26,6
321,6
6.16
24,0
1 .67
27.1
320.1
8.50
24.1
10
2.05
16.2
650.2
10,34
13.0
1 .86
25.7
345,3
6.01
22.7
1.88
21.9
308.6
7,05
25,4
11
2.28
68,0
717.2
7.27
10.7
2.90
84.4
318,4
3.31
19.3
2.27
76,6
344.0
6.49
18,8
12
2,45
29,0
864.2
13.13
9.7
2.33
5«.2
414,3
6,58
17.5
2,58
47.4
359,6
6,96
20.1
13
2,89
71,8
835.5
8,77
9.3
3,00
83,6
387.8
5,70
16,8
2,78
90,4
374 .2
6,29
16.9
Id
1.65
23.0
614.4
9.52
13.5
1.77
37.0
305.7
4,38
24,0
1.76
37.8
273.9
4,87
26.2
15
2.56
20,7
657.1
5,18
12.7
2.73
25.4
317.7
2.93
24.2
3.62
56.6
297.2
3.39
22.3
16
5.57
34,0
1500.7
5,96
5.6
5.73
47,7
612.9
3.38
12.6
8.49
164,8
602.4
4.52
10.0
17
1.60
19,0
704.7
6,07
12.0
2.09
2". 2
354.1
6.92
22.3
2.73
92.2
330.2
O.30
18.2
ie
1.52
9.7
724.2
8,22
11.9
1.72
17.0
363.2
5.42
22.4
2.50
56,5
316.4
5.01
21.5
19
1.35
12.6
681.5
6.60
12.6
1.90
19.7
314,5
5.20
25.3
2.51
62.5
329.9
5.93
20.3
20
1.92
9.6
854.0
9.39
10,1
2.83
66.8
396.0
4.79
17.4
2,94
51.0
359.3
6.80
19,8
21
3.57
202.2
700.5
4.38
8.6
3.21
144.6
345.5
2.38
15.2
2.54
85.8
381 .0
7.11
16.9
22
3.01
79,0
737.9
8,94
10,2
2.72
72.7
371,7
4.57
17.9
2.39
43.2
353.8
6.66
20,7
23
3,81
"6,3
1040,6
7,76
7.9
3.76
53.3
478.8
7.78
15.5
0.31
89. 0
485.8
8.93
13.9
2a
2.1«
23,9
639.6
7.87
13.0
2.29
71.4
309.1
4 .64
20.7
1.57
31.5
321 .6
8.70
23.6
25
1.02
13,3
657,7
9.78
13.0
1 .89
44.8
292.7
1.15
o
AJ
1 .38
21.9
288.7
6.35
27. 1
26
4.03
23.3
976.0
8,46
8.6
4.16
39.3
426.3
3.92
17.7
4.58
52.0
468. 1
7.24
15.7
27
2.10
17.5
740.5
9.19
10.7
3.07
92.6
329.8
3.99
18.3
2.40
7a.u
355,8
7.02
1S.S
28
1.96
15.0
719.1
9,09
11.9
2.31
48.3
343.0
4.78
20.8
2.53
40,7
327.2
6,09
22.2
29
3.01
22.5
968. 1
7.63
8.8
3.43
39.3
430,7
7,99
17.6
4.29
91.2
425.3
7.67
15.2
30
1 .88
56,8
651 , 1
7.86
11.9
2.74
85,7
317,3
4.52
19.3
1 .67
05.1
321.5
7.59
22.3
31
1.73
25,8
669,6
7,94
12."
2.11
34.5
303.3
4,03
24.4
1 .65
30.2
292.5
6.15
25.7
32
a.67
32.5
986.9
6,96
8.4
4.16
35.8
438.8
3.95
17.5
4.27
59,8
453.1
7.00
15.8
SUM
1.69
26.5
668.2
7.73 :
12.#
1.82
35.3
332.3
5.06 22.6
1 .83
40.5
318.6
6.23 22.9
BAG
2.19
43.0
726,2
7.84 :
11.1
2.26
64,6
343.8
4.88 :
19.6
2.17
08.6
338.3
6.15 21 .1
33
0.36
2.1
121.5
0.13
70.4
0,35
7.2
45,0
0.10
154
0,46
17.0
45.8
0 • 05
118
31
4,16
24,4
1551,9
2,59
5.5
3,90
85,7
594.0
2.01
12.0
5,88
208.2
567.0
0.07
9.7
35
2.21
11.3
868.2
0.74
9.9
1.05
3.5
483,0
0.77
18.0
2.91
99,8
350.7
0.26
17.2
36
0.72
5.6
796,8
1.09
11.0
0.96
2.6
311.5
0.95
27.9
2.28
72.2
260.6
0.30
23,0
37
1.23
«.l
471 .2
2.03
18.4
0.93
2.2
276.1
3.19
31.4
1 .06
9.5
259.2
2.85
32.0
38
0,92
3.0
512, 1
6.50
17.1
0.87
3.2
296.4
4.91
29.2
0,82
9.3
269.2
5.84
31.0
39
0.61
3,8
604,5
10.81
It.5
0.70
?.7
320.7
7.26
27.1
0.86
14,8
287.7
7.75
28.3
EMISSION RESULTS
IN GRAMS PER
MILE
(PER MINUTE FOR
IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
330
-------
APPENDIX D,CONT'D
LISTING [if MUDAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLFS
DETROIT
VEH
YEAR
HAKE
MODL
CID
Vf H
YFAR
MAKE
HODL
CID
VEH
YFAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
070
1972
PLVM
FURY
318
071
1972
PONT
CATA
350
072
1972
PONT
BONN
055
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
HC
CU
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CI)
C02
NOX
MPG
1
2
3
6.58
6.15
10,87
102,0
59.9
202,2
006,9
699.9
950.3
2.91
2.79
3.06
12.8
10.9
0.5
11.87
9.93
19.82
212.3
150.7
330.3
559.1
669,3
957,0
5.15
0.67
6,59
9.5
9.0
5.8
6.92
7.09
12.21
163.8
103.3
260.1
607.0
770 ,1
1215.2
2.53
2.37
3.08
9.6
8.7
5.2
0
5
6
0.78
1.30
J.10
90,6
06.5
37.2
601 .5
527.5
087. 1
3.50
7.09
2.10
11.7
11.5
16.0
5.88
3.31
3.10
80.5
30.9
31.0
611.1
595,7
518,0
7.97
9,82
7.15
1 1.6
13,6
15.0
0.16
2.59
2.38
61.2
3o.o
19.5
756,9
607. 3
55O.0
3.03
5.25
3,60
9.9
13.3
15.0
7
8
9
5.17
5.05
1.67
69, <1
80,2
60.2
53a.7
510.2
510.8
5,10
0.38
5.02
13.0
13.5
10.2
0.10
3.72
0.50
107.7
67,5
36.3
605.7
562.9
586.6
7.50
7.36
10.35
11.3
13.0
13.5
2.09
2.58
2.87
98.0
68.7
00.0
589.1
586.5
580.0
3.81
0.61
6.03
11.8
12.6
1 i.6
10
11
12
0.63
3.29
5.90
5«.2
120.8
98.8
550.3
552,7
660,1
0.95
0,00
5.62
13,6
11.8
10,6
5.10
0.27
5.96
35.7
70.1
56,0
608,9
680.2
750,6
9.1 0
10,07
11.89
13.0
11.0
10.3
3,18
1.72
0,90
2b.9
163.5
107,2
635.9
623,1
795. 7
0,97
3,00
6,96
12.9
9.6
9.1
13
10
15
6.52
0.02
6,79
152,5
".5
77,a
615.8
079,0
569,7
0.07
3.82
2.75
10.1
10,6
12.0
6.60
0,10
9.88
92,0
15,2
81 , 1
801.1
573,6
587.2
13.00
8,58
5.05
9.2
13.5
11.9
0,97
3.57
6.81
120,1
69,7
109,0
776,6
602.1
630,3
5,28
5.07
2.93
9.0
12.3
10,8
16
17
18
15,82
6.12
5.00
200.9
1 38.0
83,7
1072,6
532.7
532.8
3.63
3,86
3.52
5.9
11.5
13.0
26,65
7.80
5.23
310.6
1 18.6
61,8
1007.3
682.2
588.5
7.10
9.27
7.07
5.5
9.9
12.6
17,06
5.06
0.00
361 .0
126.0
79.5
1212.3
675.5
608.9
J.65
5.36
0.05
0.8
10.0
11.3
19
20
21
5.50
6.60
7.61
108.8
106.7
200.9
537.5
630.9
593.3
3.07
3.08
0, 73
12.2
10,8
9.5
6.73
7.88
7.53
92.0
76.0
208,0
638.2
705.9
705.2
9.19
8.67
5.20
11.0
1 0.0
7.9
0,63
5.30
5.52
133,0
95.5
223.0
605.1
767 .9
706.1
0.38
O.H5
2.92
10.2
9.5
8.3
22
23
20
7.15
1 1.89
0,60
117.6
199.0
83,3
612.7
7 70.5
500.9
0.77
5.03
0.05
10,8
7.9
13,7
6.99
10,20
0,05
103.0
180.5
50.9
672.8
916.0
590,0
7.00
11.03
9,87
10.0
7.1
12,8
5.20
8.23
3.15
102.2
186.0
69.5
756,6
982.0
591 .6
5,09
5.33
5. 53
8.9
6,8
12.5
25
26
27
3,98
10.27
5.90
61,7
111.3
100,5
077.0
787.0
500.5
3,60
3.92
0,30
15.1
8.9
11.3
3.65
10.05
6.00
03."
125.5
81.0
561.0
777 .5
690.8
8.51
7.52
11.76
13.8
8.7
10.6
3. 17
10,99
0.87
51.2
160.3
119.5
527.J
909. J
699. 1
5.78
0,95
6.01
10,a
7.0
9.8
28
29
30
5.53
10.23
0.36
80.0
176.0
82.0
568.7
709.9
513.6
«.36
4.11
3.79
12.5
8.7
13.5
6,61
13,88
0.01
61.3
1 70.2
73.0
629.9
1177.0
609,8
8.35
10.78
9.00
11.9
6,0
12.0
5.19
8.22
3.38
72.2
173,6
71.7
667.1
917.9
591.1
5.18
5.00
5,81
11.1
7.3
12.0
31
32
0 , 09
11.21
80,9
151.2
098,3
782,3
3,80
0,19
13.9
8,0
3,88
10.60
51.0
1 31.9
568,9
822.0
8,87
8.01
U.o
8.3
3.53
11.10
82.3
163.0
636.6
913.7
0.61
O.P7
U.O
7.0
SUM 0.22 70.1 505.9 0.05 13.1
BAG 5.6? 117.8 577.1 0.02 11.0
0,75
5.97
65.a
80,0
607.5
630,9
8.72 12,2
8,31 11,0
3.55 78.9 633.7 5.06 11.5
0.23 115.8 698.0 5.13 9.9
33
1 .15
37.5
70.0
0,09
67.0
2.12
06.0
63.8
0.11
61.9
1.50
53.3
96.3
0.?6
4H.0
30
13.9J
392,6
965. J
0.53
5.5
20.01
538.6
778.1
1.27
5.2
17.83
598.5
1233.6
2.65
0.0
35
5.51
176,5
600.3
0.53
9.9
10.07
250,6
076,6
0.56
9.8
6.69
209.5
587.5
O.OO
8.9
36
2.19
28.5
680.2
1 .00
12.1
5.32
138.0
388,0
0,02
iu.3
3.97
110.8
688.1
0.67
10.1
37
1.07
5.3
087.3
1 .67
17.8
2,08
28,7
000,6
2.73
17.8
2.32
35. 1
036,0
1.35
17.8
5fl
2.09
19.8
060.0
3.26
17.7
1.77
7.7
510.A
6.70
16.8
1.01
28.9
550.7
3.88
10,8
39
2.23
25.0
090.1
5.19
16.0
1.70
8.5
560. 0
12.35
15.2
1.12
8.1
577.2
8.13
15.0
Emission results in grams per mile (per minute for idle)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECnNOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3 'b
-------
APPENDIX 0,CONT'D
LISTING OF MODAL RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
073
YEAR
1972
MAKE
TflYO
HODL
CORO
CID
97
VEH
074
YEAR
1972
MAKE
VOLK
MODL
SEOA
CID
97
VEH
075
YEAR
1972
MAKE
VULK
MODL
SEOA
CIO
97
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
cn
C02
NOX
MPG
HC
CO
C02
NO*
MPG
1
2
3
3.46
3.53
6.03
26.7
34,6
33.9
163.5
456.2
543.6
1 .80
2,38
2.25
41,0
17,0
14.4
7.18
7,76
13.50
97.2
82.7
146.4
185.6
372.7
500,3
2.12
4.23
3.45
24.6
16.6
11.5
3.15
3,67
5.80
60.9
58.6
98.9
301,0
403,7
601,0
3.06
3.19
3.11
21.8
17.5
11.5
4
5
6
2.36
1.40
1 .44
16.2
8.1
12.3
279.0
251.6
279.3
1.63
2.32
2.54
28,4
33.0
29.3
6.58
2.90
2.41
58.6
27.5
13.3
246,9
231,6
270.9
2.36
4.28
4.50
2fl.7
31.3
29,6
2.27
2.15
2.U
40.0
32.5
27.1
352.5
324.1
288.8
3.27
5.01
3.38
21.0
23.2
26.3
7
8
9
1.86
1.96
1.98
9.9
45,8
16.0
213.0
275,6
218.1
3.33
3.10
3.9b
37.8
25.1
35.1
2.43
2.16
2,32
22.9
41.2
23.6
232.1
286,7
236, B
4,79
4.24
4.68
32.2
24.8
31.6
2.12
1 .99
3.20
31.2
39,8
39.5
316,9
314.7
317.8
5.66
3.77
U .63
23.8
23. 1
22.8
10
1 1
12
2.23
2.27
2.65
20.0
18.6
26,0
317.4
267.5
413.6
«.35
4.72
5.70
24.9
29.2
19.0
2,06
3.96
3.45
26.6
47.6
38.7
308,8
267,6
386,0
4.63
5.05
6.19
24.8
25.0
19.3
«.21
2.91
3.73
46,1
38.7
50.1
356.3
325.2
438.5
3.73
5.51
5.79
20. 1
22.5
16.8
13
14
15
2,74
2.09
3.40
22.5
26.1
23.2
311.7
287,7
349.0
4,69
3.75
2.63
25,0
26,5
22,«
4.28
2.56
6,04
60.8
39.9
56.0
362.4
244,8
272.5
6.08
3.54
2.69
18,6
28,1
23,4
3.56
3.11
3.95
54.9
35.6
44.5
387.3
325.9
369.6
6.41
3.90
3.04
18.3
22.7
18.6
16
17
18
7.37
2.36
1.92
39.4
13,0
10.7
797.3
287.9
328.6
3,78
3.74
3,76
10.1
28.1
25.2
21,60
5.44
3.55
147,0
61.5
36.1
565,3
306.7
309.8
4.14
5.32
4.24
10,3
21.1
23.5
9,38
3,08
2,49
120,2
46.8
32.1
755.9
361.5
344.9
4.52
5.90
3.72
9.1
20.0
22.0
19
20
21
1.84
2.16
2.66
8.7
13.5
27.3
279.1
400.7
283.7
3.06
4.03
3,64
29.7
20.7
26.5
4,30
3.83
3.92
44.2
36.9
64.5
286.6
382.7
317.6
5.27
5.46
4.58
24.0
19.6
20.6
2.33
3.36
3.13
36.9
36.2
49. 1
341.7
400.9
331.2
5.03
4.27
5.10
21,6
18.9
21.2
22
23
24
2.83
4.40
1.B1
43.2
30.3
9,5
356.3
414.7
269.9
4.11
3.90
5.18
20.5
18.6
30,5
3.42
7.88
2.77
53.5
100.1
28.4
301.2
422,1
299.3
3.86
4,67
5.98
22.4
14.7
25.2
4.39
5.60
2.84
60.4
79.3
29.9
403.2
506.5
339.3
4.39
5.57
5.68
17.i
13.7
22.5
25
26
27
1.73
3.86
2.2"
18,3
26,8
13.1
289.5
503.5
302,9
3.65
3.49
6.20
27.4
15,9
26.8
2. 18
8.58
4.38
24.2
58.7
42.9
244,4
384.7
310.8
4.03
3.78
6.94
30.7
17.6
22.6
3.64
6.85
3.97
38,3
66.2
50.2
331.8
569.2
374.9
4.06
4.71
6,16
22.0
12.6
19.0
28
29
30
2.20
3.83
1.84
13,6
21.1
11.4
350,7
385.7
266.6
4.35
4.01
5.24
23.4
20.6
30.6
3.48
8.37
3.52
31.0
86.5
29.1
305.3
385.8
318.9
4.16
4.66
6.28
21.3
16.2
23.6
4.14
5.56
2.49
40.6
68.3
30.6
379.3
461.0
354.5
4.51
5.73
6.13
19.5
15.1
21.6
31
32
1.B6
4.25
26.0
44.4
308.6
584,4
3.75
4.46
25.0
13.3
2.38
8.79
27.5
62.3
241.3
387.0
3.67
3.99
30.4
17.3
3.19
5.92
42.1
71.3
344.0
554,9
4.14
4.72
21 . 1
12.9
SUM
BAG
1,87
2.22
16.2
21.9
297. J
316.0
3,81 27,0
3.97 24.7
2.80 31,2 289,1
3.82 42.5 306.1
4.61 25,6
4.28 23,0
2,42 29.9 352.4 0.59 21,8
3,34 42.S 372.2 4.49 19.7
33
0,51
4.8
40, 1
0.15
180
1.55
17.2
36.2
0,06
130
0,96
12, 1
51.2
0.11
121
34
3.86
35.6
726.0
1.12
11.2
8.76
206,0
446,9
0,32
11.1
4.23
1 30,6
650.7
0.84
10,2
35
1.25
19.5
604,4
0.85
13.9
2.66
56.4
449,4
0.53
16.2
2,44
52,5
383.4
0.74
16.7
36
1.09
12.7
355,5
0.55
23.4
1.58
34.4
308,0
0.53
24.2
1 ,48
32.5
309.4
0.74
2«.3
37
0,38
1.7
285,5
0.93
30.2
0.64
9,6
236,9
1.62
34.5
0,64
2.9
295.9
2.61
29.3
38
0.92
4,4
237,7
2.92
35.9
0.67
3.7
235,4
3.73
36.5
0.59
5.0
306.1
3.84
27.9
39
1.01
11.7
255.1
1.93
31.9
0,75
6.1
272,3
6.16
31.2
0,65
3.5
334.5
5.38
26,0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PEH MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON CMINUTFS PER GALLON FUR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
¦5 ,b
-------
Appendix E - Listing of Evaporative Emission Test Results on Individual
Vehicles
Legend
VEH NO - Vehicle Number
MAKF. - Vehicle Make
MODI, - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST - Lists Whether Results were Obtained Using the SHED
Procedure or the Canister Method
SK - Final Soak Temperature for Diurnal or Hot Soak Phase
TNK - Final Fuel Tank Temperature for Diurnal or Hot Soak Phase
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in grams for Hot Soak Phase, Diurnal
Phase and the Sum of the Two Phases.
RVP - Reid Vapor Pressure of the Test ^uel
H/C - Hydrogen to Carbon Ratio of Test Fuel
IBP - Initial Boiling Point to Test Fuel in degrees Fahrenheit
57 thru 90"* - Distillation Temperatures of Test Fuel in degrees Fahrenheit
wtjP _ Final Boiling Point of Test fuel In degrees Fahrenheit
There were no vehicles with an unsealed evaporative emissions control system.
337
-------
ap.'tpjQix e
listing 0F evaporative t hs-ijn rti.r results on individual vtmcLEs
QENV-.R
--DIURUAL"- --HOT i >AK-
(6U MIN.) (60 MIN.)
vtn -temp- -rtMP- total distillation te «iPtr
CHEV
•'EGA
140
SHED
7r>
84
1.4
82
10'>
li). 8
12.16
7.6
2.24
89
13 <
148
lo I
1 7b
194
20b
218
32 5
3 do
CAN
78
86
83
¦J 5
O.O'l
7.6
2. 13
89
133
150
165
1 7o
1 94
206
217
32 1
17
cue v
-IOVA
2b0
SHED
HO
83
4.8
8 7
9
t5.4
20.20
7. b
2.2 '
87
132
149
163
1 72
193
206
21 7
32b
52!
CAN
fll
85
80
"3
0.80
7. 7
2.22
87
132
148
lDj
1 73
189
204
21b
321
20
Ciltv
•1ALI
350
SHED
79
84
7.4
83
95
5.tt
13.20
9.2
2.26
89
129
142
154
1 60
190
212
16
360
CAN
7b
83
8?
8°
0.80
8. 0
2.^5
94
138
152
163
1 74
19J
206
219
328
J 0
21
CHEV
4ALI
3b0
SHED
7"
83
21. /
84
9 7
15.8
17.4 7
/.a
2. 30
93
136
150
1 62
174
192
>03
21 7
32>>
Jr.w
CAN
84
84
81
85
0.30
7.5
2.31
93
140
153
1 6b
176
194
206
21 7
120
AW
23
ClFV
CAPS
4 0iJ
SHED
73
84
35.
84
103
5.7
41.18
8.0
2.30
91
134
147
159
I 73
192
204
209
32 I
CAN
8b
85
80
98
0.20
7.1
2.21
89
130
152
164
17
19b
212
2->4
321
i26
26
DOPG
DART
22 5
SHED
73
86
10.8
78
86
3.8
14.57
7.9
2.14
91
136
lbl
163
172
192
206
2 1
1 'jO
CAN
02
"5
77
85
0. 10
7.3
2.17
89
1 36
150
163
176
194
20n
219
321
28
FORD
ui'lT
97
SHED
7/
84
8.2
80
91
12.4
20.64
8.5
2.26
90
132
147
158
1 70
189
206
221
3' >
5 >y
CAN
7/
84
81
93
1.00
9.2
2.30
90
132
147
15"
168
192
.-12
23 >
¦>
J57
31
FORD
r JK I
3b 1
SHfD
7 1
84
6.4
d5
u6
13.7
20. 10
8. 1
2.17
9b
138
1 52
163
L 74
192
20 7
218
32 7
CAN
78
85
85
94
0.50
7.6
2.15
93
1 36
150
163
] 76
193
20b
216
12 3
w
32
FORD
TORI
351
SHED
84
02
13.4
89
104
20.5
31.86
7.8
2.36
94
137
1511
163
1 74
194
206
219
32 7
V4
CAM
79
84
76
87
1.00
7.4
2.24
ua
137
IbO
163
1 74
1 92
?'l4
216
325
3 it*
3^
FO^D
ST AW
40 '
SHED
7
84
9.4
86
99
24.8
34.23
7.4
2.13
87
132
14"J
163
1 76
194
206
219
32 5
CAN
78
34
79
92
0.10
8.0
2.1 i
87
133
149
161
1 7b
192
20b
213
321
34
FORD
LTD
400
SHED
77
84
7.8
83
93
1 7.9
25. 71
8.8
2.21
89
129
148
160
1 70
194
21 7
240
370
J/J
CAN
79
83
78
95
0.40
9. 1
2.20
89
128
143
157
167
191
21b
239
366
35
MA2D
RX2
70
SHED
79
85
9.6
91
108
45.2
54. 80
8. 1
2.30
91
1 14
147
159
170
192
210
214
340
CAN
79
83
7/
10J
0.90
9.0
2.26
8 1
127
143
156
168
192
215
238
3n4
36
MERC
BROU
429
SHED
76
85
31.8
88
101
23.3
5 1.16
7.8
2.29
86
131
1 4o
160
171
191
204
212
321
J2S
CAN
82
85
76
95
0.50
7.9
2.22
87
132
148
163
174
193
206
21 7
32b
37
OLDS
CUTL
350
SHED
76
83
32.0
89
101
28.9
60.94
7.5
2.27
96
140
1*49
15°
1 70
18
2'Jb
219
329
CAN
80
85
83
1 0
0.15
7. 7
2.26
91
131
148
163
1 76
194
206
217
329
J ->0
38
OLOS
C'JTL
45".
SHED
7 7
83
19.5
84
109
30.5
49. 9U
7.6
2.28
91
[ 33
147
lu3
172
192
21'4
21 7
320
CAN
80
83
78
106
0. 30
8.8
2.34
89
129
143
1 b6
1-5 7
192
212
ii 1
OO 1
Jul
39
PLYM
VALI
318
SHED
7 7
84
8.5
80
92
5.4
13. 87
7.6
2.20
at
132
149
161
1 73
192
;J4
216
62r
CAN
79
84
78
90
0.10
7. 7
2.16
8/
1 3
149
162
174
192
201
21 7
to
PLYM
FURY
360
SHED
80
8b
30.8
86
97
14.2
44.96
8.3
2.30
90
131
150
163
1 7b
193
206
219
AM
5 -4
CAN
78
84
81
93
0.20
8.2
2.27
91
1 32
149
163
174
192
20 7
219
3U
3 . j
42
PONT
CATA
¦P
o
o
SHED
03
86
23.9
82
97
14.3
38. 14
7.9
2.26
93
1 .7
lb2
165
1 76
J 97
214
231
•> .0
CAN
79
83
82
93
5. 10
7.9
2.21
93
13 7
1 b2
163
I 74
193
206
CL9
3? *
4 '
VOLK
SEDA
97
SHED
83
85
19.2
79
8U
b.O
2-. 12
7. 7
2.'0
94
139
152
164
176
19b
21 -d
' -*4
< it
CAN
83
85
79
32
0. 30
8. 1
2.?9
¦ -i
14 0
lb ¦
' >>7
J '8
i 07
212
2 7
* j
HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS IN G«?Ar1S
TEMPERA TUNES IN DEGRE S FAHkENHFIT
3o8
-------
Appendix F - Listing of Individual Test Results on Air-Conditioned
Vehicles
Legend
VEH NO. - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODL - Vehicle Model
CID - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
TEST TYPE - Indicates the portion of the test or composite
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test
HOT STAB - Hot stabilized portion of test
HOT START - Composite of hot transient and hot stabilized
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions in prams per mile
CO - Carbon Monoxide Emissions in grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions in grams per mile
'lOXC - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions Corrected for Humidity in
grains per mile.
Each vehicle is subjected to four tests. The tests are listed in
Appendix tt as follows:
WIRST TEST - Vehicles Air Conditioner Off - 10? is Added to Road Load
Horsepower
SECOND TEST - Air Conditioner is Turned On, Road Load Horsenower is
Set as Specified in the federal Test Procedure.
THIRD TEST - Air Conditioner Turned Off, Road Load Horsepower Set
as Specified for the Federal Test Procedure
FOURTH TEST - Repeat of ^IRST TEST
339
-------
APPENDIX F
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDIriONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST rrPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
73 CHEV CAMA 350
HOT
TRANS
I .60
11.0
637. /
3.17
13.4
A/C-OFr SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
1 .45
21.2
722.6
1.39
It . 7
HOT
START
1.52
1 o. 3
681 .3
2.26
12.5
SECOND TEST
HOT
TRANS
1.59
19.0
672.8
3.84
12.5
A/C-ON SIM-OFr
HOT
STAB
1.02
45.8
764.3
2.82
10.6
HOT
S TART
1.29
32.7
719.8
3.32
11.**
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFr
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
1.54
1 .46
1.50
11.4
16.6
14.1
62.5.9
721.8
674.2
2.92
1.37
2.13
13.7
11.8
12. 7
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF^ SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
1.68
1.35
1.51
27.8
16.1
21.8
773.7
719.6
745.9
3.02
1.37
2.17
10.8
1J .8
1' .3
027 73 DODG CHAR 318
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.89
3.21
3.05
48.0
71.6
60. 1
605.3
6 76.2
642. 7
3.90
2.5 7
3.2^
12.9
1 L . 1
11.9
SECOND
TEST
HOT
trans
2.70
46.2
604.5
4.01
A/C-ON
SIM-OFr
HOT
STAB
3.36
71.1
716.8
3.33
HOT
START
3.04
59.0
6C-2.1
3. 6r>
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
2.61
4<-(. 5
596.7
3.81
A/C-OFF
SIM-OFF
HOT
STAB
3.02
62.1
689.3
2.58
HOT
start
2.82
53.6
644 .2
3.18
FOURTH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
2.55
45.3
605.3
3. 8M
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
3.03
65.8
674.5
2.68
HOT
START
2.80
55.8
640.8
3.2b
12.9
10.6
11.6
13.2
11.1
12.0
13.0
H.3
12.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A l.'l.Sb CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
34 J
-------
AP 'ENDIX Ft CONT'D
LISTING OF INOIV IGOAL TEST RESULTS UN
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
YR MAKE
modl en
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
73 FORD
A/C—OFF
TORI 351
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2. 5?
2.9 '
2. 76
28. 7
52. t
40. 7
740.3
837.2
790.1
4.85
2.64
3.72
1 .2
9. o
10.3
SECOND
VC-ON
TEST
SIM-OF^-"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.91
3.28
3.10
3.^.8
63.8
49.2
769.2
853. o
812.5
5.24
3.02
4.10
10.7
9.2
9.9
THIRD
A/C-OF-
TEST
SIM-0F-"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.25
2.78
2.52
24. 5
49.2
37.2
728.4
831. 1
781.1
4.54
2.45
3.47
1 ' .5
9.7
10.5
FO' )RTH
A/C-OF^
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.45
2. 89
2.68
27, 1
51. 1
39.4
736.8
841.8
790.7
4.68
2.67
3.64
1 ( . 3
9.5
10.3
03 i 73 FORU
A/C-OFi-
sECOND
A/C-ON
THIRD
A/C-OF-
FOURTH
^/r-OF.
TD 40'! HOT
SIM-ON HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-OF^ HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-OFF HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-ON HOT
HOT
TRANS 3.7b
STAB '4.41
START 4.09
TRANS 3.67
STAB 4.56
START 4.13
TRANS 3.58
STAB 4.74
STAR T <+.11
TRANS 4.09
STAB 4.7/
START ^.4(1
71.4 665.6
132. 750. 0
102.6 718.6
68.3 721.2
130.9 786.9
10li.4 754.9
6 .8 679.2
130.5 738.7
9'i. 5 709.8
80.7 7 'O.B
138.i 827.3
1J0.5 79-.8
14.90 1J .0
11.31 9.1
13.06 9.9
17.10 10.6
13.64 8. ti
15.32 9.6
15.53 1.2
1j.9i 9.3
13.67 10. J
15.40 9.7
12.42 8.4
13.87 9.0
EMIS
-------
APPENDIX F tCONT'0
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO. rR MAKE MODL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
042 73 PONT BONK' 400
A/C-OFi SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.56 75.2
5.80 152.6
5.20 115.0
694.4
710.1
702.5
4.50
2.34
3.>59
10.7
9.2
9.9
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFF
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.71 73.4
5.84 146.7
5.29 ill.I
716.7
760 .4
739.1
4.69
2.96
3.80
10.5
8.6
9.5
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4.17
70.2
648.6
3.61
11.5
A/C-OF1-"
SIM-OFF
HOT
S TAB
5.67
14 4.4
692.9
2.14
9.5
HOT
START
4.94
108.3
6 71.3
2.85
HI .4
FOURTH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4. 06
108.8
671.3
4. 05
10.4
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
5.53
142.3
67 /. 6
2. L6
9. 7
HOT
STAR r
4.81
126.0
6 74.5
3.1)8
ID.'
083 71 CHEV IMPA 350
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.59 10].1
6.1' 170.9
5.37 137.0
543.0
598.5
5 71.5
5.11
2.31
3.67
12.4
1(1.0
11 .0
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OF;
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.61 9''. 2
6.OH 174.7
5.36 13 7.9
5r.2.2
633.4
593. M
5.43
3. 08
4.23
12.3
9.6
10.7
THIRD TEST
A/C-OF'- SIM-9F'r
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.63 96.4
6.72 1dh.3
5.70 143.6
515.9
572.7
54b.0
4. 74
2. 12
3.40
13,
10 ,
11 .
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.87 103.U
6.46 187.7
5.69 146.5
515.5
5 70.0
543.5
4. 75
1. 90
3.34
12,
10,
1 t .2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A K1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
542
-------
APi'ENOIX F»CONT»D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TES T RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE
MOOL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
092
71 FORD
A/C-OF'-
GALA 351
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
trans
STAlS
START
4.93
4.59
4. 76
44.3
68.4
56. 7
583. 7
676. 1
631. 1
8.64
6.2 H
7. 4.3
btCOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFt-"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
5.05
4.51
4.7/
48.3
. 9
57.9
564.3
680.0
623. 7
8.34
6.3^
7.31
THIRD
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-OFr
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.B6
4.31
4.57
4b. 7
63. 7
54. 9
564. 9
6n9. b
618.6
7.98
6.14
7. U 4
FOURTH
A/C-UF
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.80
4.2 i
4. bO
45. 8
60.6
53.4
569. 4
6-,3.1
61 7.5
8.37
5. 9<+
7. 12
093
71 FORD
A/C-OF?"
BROU 429
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAH
STAR T
3.35
2.8a
3.1J
24.9
41.4
3 5.4
658.3
7 f4. 9
718. 1
11 .37
6.21
9. 75
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAH
START
3.51
2.93
3.21
28.9
46. 9
38.1
633. 7
779.1
708.3
11.13
8.39
9.72
THIRD
A/C-OF
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAH
START
3.33
2.83
3.0 7
32.4
47.5
40.1
631.9
760.2
697.8
10.41
7.36
8.84
t-UEL
ECO! I
1 3. 6
1 1 . j
12.1
13.5
11.1
12.2
13.6
11.3
12.3
13. b
1 i . t>
12.4
12.5
10.5
U .4
12,
10.
1i ,
12.8
10.5
1 l.b
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS 3.33 32.4 656.4 10.92 12.4
HOT STAB 2.74 48.2 75b.9 7.3b 10.6
HOT START 3.0 3 40.5 707.5 9.US? 1:.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GAL' ON
RJEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS .UME A i:i.8b CAR WON : HYDROGEN K A TIO
343
-------
APPENDIX FrCONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MO')L CID
TEST type
HC
CO
C02
FUEL
NOXC ECON
096 71 OLDS 98 455
A/C-OFP SIM-ON
HOT TRANS 2.22 33.5 764.1 9.6^ 10.6
HOT STAB 3.26 6 .0 809.9 5.5) 9.6
HOT START 2.75 50.2 787.6 7.55 10.1
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OF:-"
HOT TRANS 2.19 30.0 804.4 1J.33 10.3
HOT STAB 3.46 66.0 890.2 8.63 8.o
HOT START 2.84 48.5 848.5 9.^5 9.5
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFf- SIM-OFF
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.21
3.17
2.70
32.4
65.0
49.1
725.1
806.7
767.0
8.92
5.80
7.32
1 ¦ .3
9.7
10.4
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFh SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
1.93
3.06
2.51
29.4
60.9
45.6
751.2
821.5
787.3
9.47
6.03
7. 7,1
11.0
9.6
10.2
098 71 PLYM
A/C-OF"
SECOND
A/C-ON
THIRD
A/C-OF-
FOURTH
A/C-OFF
ATE 318 HOT
SrM-ON HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-OFF HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-OF HOT
HOT
TEST HOT
SIM-ON HOT
HOT
TRANS 2.78
STAB 3.48
START 3.14
TRANS 3.09
STAB 3.96
START 3.54
TRANS 2.83
STAB 3.55
START 3.20
TRANS 2.84
STAB 3.37
START 3.11
2 7.1 563.8
50.6 23.0
39.2 594.2
40 .4
561.2
67.6
623.1
54.3
593.0
2a.9
533.5
54.6
bO J. 9
42.1
568.1
29.8 546.2
50.3 601.5
40.3 574.6
8.51 14. t
6.61 12.4
7.53 13.3
8.34
14.0
6. 85
12.0
7.57
12.9
7.80
15.1
6.31
12.7
7.04
13.8
H.P5 14. /
6.4 7 J 3.8
7. 3 •> 13./
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY C'VLCULA TIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON : HYDROGEN RATIO
34
-------
AP ENDIX F t CON T* D
LIST INb OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIK-CONDIT[ONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE
MODL CIO
TEST
TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
hUEL
ECON
131
69 CHEV
A/C-OFK
IMPA 350
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
S TART
4.43
4. 38
4.40
73.1
55.6
64.1
571.6
6 34 • 6
604. 0
3.18
1.93
2. 54
12. r
12. L
12.3
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4. 16
4. 02
4.09
79.3
71. 1
75.1
56t~). 6
6^0.5
614.8
2.94
2.04
2.48
12.6
11.3
1J .9
THIRL)
A/C-OFP
TEST
SIM-OFJ-
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAQ
START
4.23
3.90
4. 06
72.9
58.4
65. 5
525.?
622.0
574.9
2.35
1.79
2.06
13.6
12.2
12.9
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT ST A5
HOT START
4.58
4. 44
4.51
72.6
63.2
67. 8
527.8
61 7.4
573.8
2.43
I .60
2.0 )
13. 5
12.1
12. 8
6« CHRY
TOWN 383
HOT
TRANS
5.13
77.0
659.6
6. 70
A/C~OF<-
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
4. 94
60.4
750.8
6.47
HOT
START
5.03
68. 5
706.4
6.58
SECOND
TEST
HOT
TRANS
5.26
99.7
65^. 1
5.90
A/C-ON
SIM-OFK
HOT
STAB
5.32
84.5
763.8
6.16
HOT
START
5.29
91.9
710.9
6.03
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4.78
69.6
630.9
6.23
A/C-OFF
SIM-OFt-
HOT
STAB
4. 45
54. 4
739.2
7. 18
HOT
START
4.61
61.8
68<*>. 5
6. 72
1 ,. :
10. 3
10 . 7
9.7
1 > .7
10.6
1; . 1
FOURTH TEST
<\/C-OF-~ SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.64
4.4-9
4.56
68. 7
55. 0
61.7
629.1
737.5
68'+. 7
6.36 1 . . ti
6.24 10.6
6.3U 1..J
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALt.ON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHON:HYDROGEN RATIO
345
-------
/\PL,ENDIX F» CONT r L)
LISTING OF iNUIVfD'JAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDI TIONEL) VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02 NOXC
FUEL
ECON
139 69 FORD STAW 390
A/C-OFh SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFF
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
140 69 MERC MONT 390
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFF
THIRD TEST
A/C-OF'-' SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.33
3.97
3. b
26.9
40. 1
33. 7
o50.0
689.3
670.2
3.62
3.74
3.68
25.6
44.8
35.5
662.3
731.5
697.8
3.27
3.43
3.35
25.4
40.8
33.3
654 • 3
680. 7
667. 8
3.29
3.40
3.35
2?. 9
39.0
31.2
632.8
t>87.8
661.0
4.19
4.46
4.33
90. 4
128. 7
li.0.1
642.5
732.1
68l... 5
5.47
5.01
5.23
107.7
148.0
128.4
662.0
747.6
705.9
4.39
4.81
4.61
92.0
1.43. 7
11 8.6
617.0
71 1.5
6e>5. 5
4.27
4.72
4.50
96.1
142.6
120.0
625.1
714.2
670.8
8.78
8.26
8.86
b. 92
4.7 7
5.33
6.07
4.94
5.49
5. 53
4. 5b
5.03
b.81
4.63
5.20
12.t>
11 .6
12.1
12.4
10.9
1 L .6
12.6
1 i.7
12.1
13.1
11.7
12.3
1J . 1
9.4
10.1
10.5
8.9
9.6
11.4
9.3
10.2
11.2
9. o
10.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS UME A 1:L-85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
34.,
-------
APPENDIX F>CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO- YR MAKE MOUL CID TEST TYPE HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
111 69 OLDS DELT 455
A/C-Of-' SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.54 102.7
4.43 145.8
3.9V 124.8
559. 3
668. 4
62^. 9
4.50
2.59
3.S2
1 ¦ . o
9. 7
lO.b
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFt-
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
J.58 103.9
4.70 163.4
4.15 134.4
60'J • 6
701.0
652.1
3.80
2.86
3.32
11.4
". 1
10. 1
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFP
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.62 107.2
4.25 148.6
3.94 128.4
586. 7
6o2. 1
625.4
4.51
2. 50
3. 48
1 .6
9.8
10.o
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.51 103.3
4.10 141.0
3.81 12^.6
585.5
641. 7
614.4
2.68
2.54
2. bl
1 i . 7
1'). I
io. a
170 67 CHEV i
CAPR 32 7
HOT
TRANS
6.12
64.0
556.2
4. 54
13. 1
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
5.84
83.2
562.0
2.5 7
12. 5
HOT
START
5.97
73.9
559.2
3.5^
12.8
SECOND
TEST
HOT
1RANS
5.30
61.3
525.8
3.98
15.9
A/C-ON
SIM-OFP
HOT
STAB
6. 45
90.7
612.1
2.91
1 .
HOT
START
5.89
76.4
570.1
3.43
12.5
TH1HO
TEST
HOT
TRANS
5.61
55.6
541. 5
4.32
13.7
A/C-OFF
SIM-OFt-"
HOT
STAB
6.23
81.9
569.2
2. 61
12.4
HOT
START
5.92
69.1
55. 7
3.4
13. n
FOURTH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
5.61
60.1
538.8
4.42
13.6
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
6.45
84.0
562.2
2.50
12.4
HOT
START
6.04
72.4
550.8
3.44
13.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL liCONJMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
J47
-------
APPENDIX F»CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02 NOXC
FUEL
ECON
17i 6/ CHRY NEW/P 383
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
7.46 208.2
6.63 178.4
7.03 192.y
47 f.6
5b4. b
b 17.1
1.27
1.19
1.38
10.7
10.4
10.b
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OF-
HOT TKANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
7.20 196.3
6.31 174. <
b.7b 185.2
<+68.i
551.1
511.i
1.27
1.50
1.39
11 ,
10,
10
THIRD TEST
A/C-OF- SI M-')FF
HOT TKANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
7.05 198.9
6.49 181.1
6.76 189.7
465. 4
53^.4
50fl. 3
1.20
1.30
1.25
1 1 ,
10,
10,
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TKANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
7.49 206.6
6.49 180.5
6.97 193.2
462. 1
543.4
504.1
1.21
1 .35
1.28
10
10
10
, 9
b
, 7
175 67 FORD LTD 390
A/C-OF^ SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.84
4.47
4.65
28. 4
24. 0
26.2
582.5
646.6
615.4
9.67
6.69
8.14
13.8
12.7
13.2
SECOND
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4.49
24.1
580.5
9.22
14.0
A/C-ON
SIM-OFF
HOT
STAB
4.39
27.3
631.8
6.38
12.9
HOT
START
4.44
25.7
606.9
7. 76
13.4
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4.02
16.5
562.7
9.2 T
14.8
A/C-OFF
SIM-OFF
HOT
STAB
4.13
22.8
635.8
6.21
13.0
HOT
start
4.08
19.7
600.2
7.68
13. ti
FOURTH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
4.06
20.9
564.6
9.06
14.b
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
4.30
31.3
623.8
6.25
12.9
HOT
START
4.18
26.2
595. 0
7.62
13. 7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A i:i.85 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
348
-------
APPENDIX FfCONT'O
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
HOUSTON
>/EH
NO.
YK MAKE
MODL CID
TEST type
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
176
67 MERC
A/C-OFF
STAW 428
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
trans
STAB
START
7. 12
8.93
8.05
194.9
265.0
230.9
548. 3
569. 7
559.2
1.82
0.93
1.36
U.l
8.7
9.4
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
7.33
9.16
8.27
205. 7
274. 7
241.1
540.8
563.4
552.4
1.66
0.90
1.27
1 O.U
8.7
9.3
THIRD
A/C-OF1-"
TEST
SIM-OF,-
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
6.94
8.47
7.72
194.9
260.5
228.6
52^.6
560.3
542.0
1.58
0.97
1.27
10.4
8.9
9.6
FOURTH
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
stab
START
6. 10
7.26
6.70
172. 0
236.4
205.0
549. 7
582. 1
56t>. 3
2.03
1.2 J
1.6]
10 .6
9.1
9.8
17/ fc>7 OLDS 98 425
A/C-OFt- SIM-ON
HOT TRANS 9.03 86.7 59b.7 6.02 1L.7
HOT STAB 10.62 10^.6 606.4 ,3.42 10.9
HOT START 9.85 98.4 602.2 4.69 1. 3
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OF
HOT TRANS 8.71 8 .8 553.7 5.04 12.3
HOT STAB 10.82 98.7 622.7 3.9U 10.9
HOT START 9.79 93.9 589.1 4.4':> 1 .6
THIRD TEST
A/C-OF1" SIM-OF'
HOT TRANS 8.09 70.3 542.5 5.4. 13.1
HOT STAB 10.87 93.0 570.5 3.42 1 .8
HOT START 9.52 8]. 9 5\>6.9 4.40 12.4
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF t- SIM-ON
HOT TRANS 8.35 75.6 538.0 4.90 13.0
HOT STAB 10.81 91.8 569.3 3.52 1 '• . 9
HOT START 9.61 83.9 bo4.1 4.19 12.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A i:i.85 CARdON:HYUROGtN RATIO
^49
-------
APPENDIX F
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TESI RESULT^ ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
NO. fK MAKE MOOL CIO TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
wuxc
fuel
ECOlM
0')1 74 8UIC 1
A/C-OFi-
ELEC 455
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.22
1.47
1.04
19.6
10.1
14.7
678.1
780.4
73U.6
3.47
2.12
2. 18
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFH"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAd
START
1.15
1.69
1.43
16.5
12.2
14.3
616.4
740.1
679.9
2.68
2.10
2.38
THIRD
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAH
START
1.31
1.61
l.<+7
17.2
12.0
14.6
613.0
732.6
674.4
2.68
2.03
2.35
FOURTH
A/C-OFr
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
start
1. 12
1.60
1.36
16.5
12.4
14.4
620.8
716.2
6 9.8
r
1.95
2.35
003 74 CHEV
A/C-OFr
IMPA 350
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
S TART
2.08
2.10
2.0s»
38.4
14.9
26.4
78^.1
862.0
925.5
b. 56
6. 06
6. 30
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM—OF'-
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.98
5. 13
4.08
56.1
HI. 0
6B.9
7 4.4
139^.4
1095.2
5.26
16.11
10.83
THIKO
A/C-OF^-"
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.29
2.10
2.19
35. 4
] 8.5
26. 7
81 0.8
91 i . 1
862.3
5.57
5.63
rj.60
FOURTH
A/C-OFr
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
1.61
2.02
1.92
35.3
16.6
25.7
7B5.0
894. a
841.4
5.91
4.89
5.39
12.4
II. L
11. f
J 3. 7
1 i . o
12.6
a. a
1 . .7
12.6
13.6
12.0
12. 7
10. 4
9.9
ID.2
1U.2
5.8
7.3
10.2
9.4
9.7
10.5
9.6
10.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS'jUME A 15 1.85 CARdON:HYDROGEN RATIO
3'jO
-------
APPENDIX F tCON T'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE
MODL CID
TEST TfPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
0' 7
74 OLDS
A/C-OF-
CUTL 350
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.28
2.36
2.32
13.6
11.8
12.7
710.0
824.8
768.9
4.30
3.5 :i
3.92
12.0
10.4
11.1
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.9 2
2.69
2.80
19.2
10.2
14.5
692.6
876.2
786.8
4.13
4. 76
4."-5
12. 1
9.9
] 0.8
THIRD
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
1.98
2.18
2.08
12.8
12.0
12.4
699. 0
813.6
757.8
3.70
3.21
3.45
12.2
10.6
H.3
FOUR TH
A/C-OpF
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
stab
START
1.94
2.07
2.01
11.5
8.2
9.8
714. 1
809. ^
763.3
3.59
3.29
3.4..
12. (J
10.7
H.3
nna
74 PLYM :
A/C-OFF
SATE 318
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.16
4.62
4.39
56.6
98.2
77.9
bOU.8
643.3
62^.6
3.40
1.85
2.60
12.6
10.9
11 .7
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OF
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.09
4.52
4.31
56.9
102.4
80.3
612.8
6 7.8
641.0
3.54
2.14
2.82
12.4
10.5
li.4
THIRD
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-OF1-"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
3. 75
4. -+5
4.11
52.9
99.0
76.5
579.6
631. 1
606.0
3.24
1. 76
2.40
13.2
11.1
12.0
FOJRTH
4/C—0Fr
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
3. 75
4. 56
4.07
53.7
71.6
62.9
595.4
650.6
623.8
3.39
1.87
2.61
12.8
11.4
12.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A i:i.B5 CAKBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
351
-------
APPENDIX FrCONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
\/EH
NO. YR MAKE MOOL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
0 09 74- PONT BONN 400
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3. JO
3.07
3.18
20.5
20.6
20.6
619.4
896. 0
858.7
5.28
3.30
4.26
10.3
9.5
9.8
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OF1-
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.87
3.43
4.13
31.4
29.4
30.4
791.8
906.2
850.5
4.61
3. 3d
3.96
10.4
9.2
9.7
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFF
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.31
3. 05
3. 18
19.1
20.4
19.8
739.8
868.1
805.6
3.86
2.92
3.38
11.4
9.8
10.5
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFi" SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.92
2.93
2.92
20.4
17.5
18.9
798.0
873.1
836. n
4. 74
2.97
3.83
10.6
9. 9
10. 1
023 7o CHEV
A/C-OFF
CAPR 400
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
STA-ll
3.17
2.16
2.63
45.9
54 . 4
on.3
664.4
737.4
701.8
3.83
2. 52
3.1 5
11.9
10.7
1 ' .2
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OF*-
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
S TART
3. b6
2.87
3.21
56. 6
b8.8
57. 7
695.1
7/2.0
73^.6
4.05
3.16
3.59
11.2
i 0.2
10.6
THIRD
A/C-O"-
TEST
SIM—OF.1-"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TR ANS
STAB
START
2.
-------
APPENDIX F»CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RtbULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
FUEL
YR MAKE MODL CIO
TEST
' TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
73 ford must 351
HOT
TRANS
3.54
52.4
564.3
2. 59
13.5
4/c-of- sim-on
HOT
STAB
4.12
84. 4
628.8
2.02
11.5
HOT
START
3.84
68. d
597.4
2.30
12.4
SECOND TEST
HOT
TRANS
6.33
51.2
573.0
2.60
13.2
4/C-ON SIM-OFF
HOT
STAB
4.06
82.9
620.5
1.92
11.6
HOT
STAR T
5.17
67.4
597.4
2./5
12.3
THIRD TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.84
49.8
5 2.8
2.32
13.8
A/C-OFF SIM-OFF
HOT
stab
4.25
84.8
621.1
1.83
li.6
HOT
START
4.05
67.8
587.9
2. 0 7
12.6
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF.- SIM—ON
HOT TPANS
HOT ST AB
HOT START
4.08
4.97
4.5 +
48.9
8.1.3
69.2
560 • 6
blO.l
586. 0
2.43
1.HU
2. lU
13. t>
11.6
i 2. 5
036 73 MERC MARQ 429
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.29
3.41
3.84
74.3
95.8
85.4
716.7
871.5
796.1
5.09 10.5
3.3b 8.6
4.20 9.4
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-0Fr
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.53
3.40
3.95
63.0
85.4
74. 5
7/6.5
882.8
831. 1
6.19
3.59
4.86
10.0
8.6
9.2
THIRD TEST
A/C—OFF SIM-OFF
HOT 1RANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.60
3.36
3.48
53.7
82.2
68.4
7/2.9
874.8
825.2
5.95 10.2
3.J9 8.7
4.6U y.4
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFi-" SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
3.26
3.22
3.24
58.0
81.3
69.9
7 '3.1
8.-2.2
829.1
6.09 10.1
3.4b 6.7
4. /3 0.3
EM IS JON RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON I HYDROGEN RATIO
35 >
-------
APPENDIX FfCONT'U
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS
AlR-CONOITIONED VEHICLES
On
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
DETROIT
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.57
5.23
4.91
35.4
62.0
49.1
652.9
710.5
682.4
7.18
3.29
5.18
12.3
10.8
11 .b
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.15
4.43
4.30
37.1
5b. 2
46.4
67 7.8
80b. 7
743.5
7.54
5.58
6.53
I] .8
9.8
10.7
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.28
4.71
4.50
32.6
51.2
42.1
637.6
7bl. 3
695.9
6.30
3.20
4.71
12.6
10.5
11.4
HOT
HOT
HOT
trans
STAB
S TART
3.68
4.57
4. 1<+
29.2
4^.1
36.8
584.2
7 L 8. 5
653.1
5.68
3.36
4.49
13.8
11. 1
12.3
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
8.19
1 l .27
9. 77
96.9
190.4
144.9
b09. ]
646. 6
628. 3
7.27
4.09
b. 64
1 j .3
9.0
LO.'/
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
9.45
12.96
11.25
135.5
173.8
155.1
645. 4
67/. 7
662.0
7.17
4.94
6.03
10.0
8.9
y.4
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
STAR r
d. 93
13.31
1 L.21
107.8
207.3
158. y
565.3
61 L .8
589.2
6.28
3.40
4.80
1.' .6
9.1
10.2
HOT
TRAMS
8.91
107.3
584. b
6. 62
11.4
042 73 PONT GRNA 400
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON STM-OFF
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFH SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
046 72 BUIC LESA 350
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFK
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFi- SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFh SIM-ON
HOT STAB 12.37 193.7 609.2 3.51 9.3
HOT START 10.69 151.7 597.2 5.02 10.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MlLE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS UME A 1 :1. Bt> CARBON.'HYOROGEN RATIO
354
-------
APPENDIX FtCONT'Q
LISTING OK INDIVIDUAL TEbT RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
Obi 72 CHEV STAW 350
A/C-OF SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFr-
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
HOT TRANS
3.42
26.5
726.2
HOT STAB
2.71
31.5
819.1
HOT START
3.06
29.1
7 / 3. 9
HOT TRANS
3.31
82. 7
69^. y
HOT STAB
4.09
98.3
796. 1
HOT START
3. 71
90. 7
749.3
NOXC
3.ay
5.27
7.03
~.02
5.
~. 54
FUEL
ECON
L L . 4
I.J. 1
10. /
10.6
9.2
y. d
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFf
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2. 76
J.46
3.12
43. 8
67.9
56.1
663. 7
774. I
720. 7
7.60
4. 38
5. 95
12.0
y.y
10. 8
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF.- SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.97
3. 56
3.17
48.8
63. 1
56.2
6 .2.4
7 75.8
720.6
7. 68
4. 4J
6.01
1 i .9
LO . ¦)
10.d
061 72 FORI) GALA 3bl
A/C-OF1-" SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
4.08 66.b
*+. 10 96.4
4.09 81.9
608.5
683.2
64o. 9
6.38 12.2
2.85 LU.b
4.57 11.3
SECOND
TEST
HO r
TRANS
4.61
74. 1
592.1
6.45
A/C-ON
SIM-OFi
HOT
STAB
7.25
131. 7
682. 0
2. 9-;
HOT
START
5.97
103.7
638.3
4.6/
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.95
65.7
551.9
5. 54
A/C~OF>-
SIM-OFh
HOT
STAB
3. 74
99.2
648.2
2.48
HOT
START
3.84
82.9
601.3
3.97
f-OURTH
T EST
HOT
TRANS
4.26
89.3
/'Ob. 0
8.51
A/C-OF-
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
4. 02
122. 0
651. 8
2.28
HOT
START
4.13
106.1
67 7. 7
5.32
° 7
10.3
in.4
10.3
EMIS >ION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL tCONJMr CALCULATIONS ASiUME A 111.85 CARUON:HYDROGEN RATIO
35d
-------
APPENDIX F» CON Tf D
LISTING
OF INDIVIDUAL
. TEST
RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETROIT
VEH
FUEL
NO.
YR MAKE i
MOOL CIO
TEST rypE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
ECON
06b
72 OLDS '
CUTL >350
HOT
TRANS
4.03
27.6
1
7. 19
13.6
A/C-OP
SIM-ON
HOT
s r Ay
3.HO
4h.3
675.8
3.'-U
1 ' .7
HOT
START
3. 91
36. 1
63 5.1
5.51
12.6
SECOND
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.91
2b. 4
64n. 5
8. 79
12.7
A/C-ON
SIM-OF1-"
HOT
STAB
3.67
4L.6
726.4
5.12
11 .0
HOT
START
3. 79
i i,7
686. b
6.90
1 i . 8
THIRD
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.56
24.0
bfie.6
6.35
14.3
A/C-OFF
SIM-OFh
HOT
S TAB
3.42
38. 7
6b0 • 7
3. 58
12.3
HOT
START
3.48
31.9
fjlO.8
4.93
13.2
FOUR TH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3. 72
24.6
564.2
6. 61
14.4
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
3.42
3 7.4
642.6
3.58
12.5
HOT
START
3.57
31.2
b04.5
5.05
13. ^
083
71 CHEV
ST AW 350
HOT
TRANS
3.32
59.2
644.9
7.62
11.9
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
4.34
74. 4
680. 4
5. «9
10.9
HOT
STAR T
3.84
67.0
663.1
6. 83
1 i .4
SECOND
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.90
89.1
67/.9
8.67
10.7
A/C-ON
SIM-OFP
HOT
STAB
4.61
86.7
748.5
8.05
9.9
HOT
START
4.26
87.9
714.1
8.35
10.3
THIRD
TEST
HOT
I RANS
3.59
64.5
615.2
8. 11
12.2
A/C-OF*-"
SIM-QFF
HOT
STAB
4.13
70.6
6 76.9
6.11
1) . 1
HOT
START
3.87
67. 7
646.9
7.08
11.6
FOURTH
TEST
HOT
TRANS
3.60
51. 1
639.5
6. 79
12.1
A/C-OFF
SIM-ON
HOT
STAB
3.93
6 >.2
676.3
6. 36
11.2
HOT
START
3. 76
S8. 8
6^9. 4
7.55
11.6
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATION^ ASSUME A i:i.d5 CARBON:HYDROGEN RATIO
3bb
-------
APrJENDI X F,CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
DETKOIT
YR MAKE
MODL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
71 FORD
A/C-OF
LTD 351
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.86
3. 79
4.31
35.8
34.6
35.2
650.2
744.1
698.4
7.10
4.64
5.84
12.3
1 L.O
1 1.6
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OFh
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
STAR T
3.06
3.23
3.15
36. 7
40. 7
38.8
657.6
759. 5
709. v
6,97
5.18
6.05
12.2
10.6
11.4
THIRD
A/C-OF'-
TEST
SIM-OF^
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
3.93
2.60
3.25
36.0
31.9
3 i. 9
633.3
740.5
688.4
6.59
4.93
5.74
12.6
11. 1
11.8
FOURTH
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2. 76
2.41
2.60
32.8
30.0
31.3
647. 9
741.2
b95.8
6.81
4.59
5.67
12.5
1 . . 1
1 : .8
096 71 OLDS OELT 45'->
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.47
1.73
2.0V
24.7
25.4
25.1
68o. 6
804.6
747.1
7.83
3.93
5.83
12.1
11). 4
11.2
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFF
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.82
2.27
2.54
36.8
61.8
49.6
709.6
847.9
780.6
8. 14
4.23
6.13
11.4
9.3
10.2
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFf-
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
2.10
1.7
1.93
35.2
46. 0
40.8
656.8
795.5
728.0
6.53
3.19
4.82
12.3
10.2
1 . . I
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF*-" SIM-ON
HOT TRANS
HOT STAB
HOT START
1.92
2.0.1
1.96
31.6
53.0
42.6
615. 7
815.6
732.9
6.48
3.38
4.89
12.7
9.8
1 .0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PES MILt
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1 :1. 8t> CARBON J HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX F»CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLES
VEh
NO. YR MAKE MODL CID
DETROIT
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
fuel
EC ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAd
START
3.05
4.2 0
3.64
32. 7
64.-3
49. 0
5~>2 . o
5 9.9
5o6. 3
7.41
5.37
6.3b
14.5
1 3.2
13.8
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAd
START
4.4 2
5.09
4. 76
49.8
92. 7
71.9
550. i)
58rt. 3
569. o
7.03
5.03
6.01
13. a
11.8
12.7
HOT
HOT
nor
TRANS
STAB
START
3.05
3.66
3. Jb
28.5
S2.5
40.8
523. 4
54 0.0
6.89
5.13
5.90
15.4
13. 7
14 . 4
HOT
HOT
HOT
TR ANS
STAd
STAR T
2.90
3.73
3.3?
29.4
49.
39. P
539.5
567.1
5r>3. 7
7.05
5.42
6.21
14.9
13.5
14.2
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STA'3
START
4.06
4.91
4.50
51.4
92.5
72.5
589.3
613.2
601.6
8.56
5.90
7.19
13.0
1 i .5
12.2
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4. 78
5.20
5.00
74.3
10 0.7
87.9
606.2
622.5
614.6
9.18
6.68
7.89
12.0
1 ) . 1
11.5
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAd
START
4.26
5.05
4.6 7
61.6
97.8
80.2
57 7.3
61J .5
594.8
8.34
5.99
7.13
12.9
11.4
12.1
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
4.36
4.98
4.67
6 .0
93.1
79.9
379.9
606.6
496.3
8.57
5.76
7.13
17.8
11.5
13.9
098 71 PLYM SATE 318
A/C-Oh'r SIM-UN
SECOND test
A/C-ON SIM-OFF
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OF- SIM-ON
139 69 FORD GALA 390
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
SECOND TEST
A/C-ON SIM-OFt
THIRD TEST
A/C-OFc SIM-OFF
FOURTH TEST
A/C-OFF SIM-ON
EMIS'ION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARHON!HYDROGEN RATIO
358
-------
APPENDIX F»CONT'D
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULTS ON
air-conditioned vehicles
DETROIT
VEH
NO.
YR MAKE
MODL CID
TEST TYPE
HC
CO
C02
NOXC
FUEL
ECON
140
69 4ERC
A/C-OF--
MONT 390
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
STAR r
4.52
5. 19
4.87
46.8
73.5
60.5
627.5
697.4
663.4
8.87
6.40
7.60
12.4
10. 1
11.5
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OF^
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
S TART
5.03
5.89
5.17
74.8
105.8
90.7
634.6
710.0
673.3
8.40
5.75
7.04
11.6
9.9
10.7
THIRD
A/C-OFh
TEST
SIM-OFF
HOT
HOT
HOT
trans
STAB
START
4. 45
5.17
4.82
54.1
67.3
60.9
601.9
682.9
643. 5
8.19
5.DO
6.81
12. 7
11.0
11.8
F'Ji JR rH
A/C-OF"
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
start
4.5
5.15
4.86
59.6
73.2
66.6
613.7
685. 7
650. 1
8.39
6.06
7.20
12.3
10.9
L I .5
14w
69 PONT '
A/C-OF^"
CATA 400
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
MOT
TRANS
STAB
star t
3.17
3.73
3.46
29.3
36.2
32.8
58;}. 7
b48.4
619.4
8.38
6. 65
7.49
13.8
12.4
13.0
SECOND
A/C-ON
TEST
SIM-OF^"
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
3.9'}
3.76
3.87
51.2
37.2
44.0
627.2
695.0
6o2.0
9.40
8. 71
9.05
12.3
1 . .6
11.9
THIRD
A/C-OFF
TEST
SIM-0Fc
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
START
2.96
3.50
3.24
32.3
35.6
34.0
573.1
639.5
607.2
8.19
6.77
7.46
14.0
12.6
13.2
FOURTH
A/C-OFh
TEST
SIM-ON
HOT
HOT
HOT
TRANS
STAB
STAR T
3.50
3.46
3.47
33.0
33.5
33.3
57 .6
637. 3
608.2
8.57
6.69
7.60
13.9
12. 7
13.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
FUEL ECON 'MY IN MILES UER GALLON
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS AS;>UME A 1!1.85 CARBON: HYDROGEN RATIO
359
-------
Appendix G - Listing of Loaded Vehicle Test Results on Individual Vehicles
Legend
The heading of each test contains five Items describing the vehicle
tested, they are*
Vehicle Number
Model Year
Vehicle Make
Vehicle Model
Engine Displacement In Cubic Inches
Each vehicle was subjected to three tests, each using the modal emissions
testing procedure. The first test was conducted with the normal
Inertia weight and road load horsepower. The second test was conducted
with an increased Inertia weight to simulate a vehicle with additional
passengers and baggage. The third test was conducted with additional
inertia and additional road load horsepower to simulate the conditions
a vehicle would experience while towing a trailer. Appendix G Is divided
into three tests for each vehicle. Above the results for each test
is listed the Inertia weight and the road load horsepower at which the
test was conducted.
IWT - Inertia Weight in pounds
RLHP - Road Load Horsepower
MODE NO. - Lists the Individual Modes of the Test
1 thru 32- Modes of the Surveillance Driving Sequence (ST)S),
listed on the following page
SUM - a composite of the SDS and the Steady States
BAG - Results of the entire SDS as measured using the CVS
(should closely match SUM)
33 - Idle mode
34-5 MPH Steady State
35 - 10 MPH Steady State
36 - 15 MPH Steady State
37 - 30 MPH Steady State
38 - 45 MPH Steady State
39 - 60 MPH Steady State
360
-------
Appendix G (cont)
HC - Hydrocarbon Emissions In grams per mile
00 - Carbon Monoxide Emissions In grams per mile
C02 - Carbon Dioxide Emissions In grams per mile
NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Emissions In grams per mile
FUEL ECON - Fuel Economy In miles per gallon, Calculated Using the
Carbon Balance Method.
361
-------
SURVEILLANCE DRIVING SEQUENCE
Mode Average Accel-
No
Type
Speed Range
Time la Mode
Average Speed
eratlon Rate
Distano
(mph)
(sec)
(mph)
(mph/sec)
(miles
1
Accel
0-30
12
18.05
2.50
0.0602
2
Decel
30-0
16
16.66
-1.88
0.0741
3
Accel
0-15
8
9.04
1.88
0.0201
A
Accel
15-30
11
23.07
1.36
0.0705
5
Accel
30-45
13
37.65
1.15
0.1360
6
Decel
45-30
12
38.05
-1.25
0.1268
7
Accel
30-60
17
45.80
1.76
0.2163
8
Decel
60-45
12
51.48
-1.25
0.1716
9
Accel
45-60
14
52.54
1.07
0.2043
10
Decel
60-15
30
40.40
-1.50
0.3367
11
Accel
15-60
26
43.42
1.73
0.3136
12
Decel
60-0
21
33.83
-2.86
0.1973
13
Accel
0-60
32
37.27
1.88
0.3313
14
Decel
60-30
23
46.86
-1.30
0.2994
15
Decel
30-15
9
23.18
-1.67
0.0579
16
Decel
15-0
8
7.81
-1.88
0.0173
17
Accel
0-45
22
28.85
2.05
0.1759
18
Decel
45-15
16
31.33
-1.88
0.1392
19
Accel
15-45
18
30.55
1.67
0.1528
20
Decel
45-0
19
24.72
. -2.37
0.1304
21
Accel
0-60
25
38.28
2.40
0.2654
22
Decel
60-0
28
33.88
-2.14
0.2634
23
Accel
0-30
15
17.73
2.00
0.0737
24
Accel
30-60
25
45.14
1.20
0.3134
25
Decel
60-30
18
47.23
-1.67
0.2362
26
Decel
30-0
10
15.99
-3.00
0.0444
27
Accel
0-60
38
38.01
1.58
0.4009
28
Decel
60-0
35
33.87
-1.71
0.3293
29
Accel
0-30
18
17.73
1.07
0.0886
30
Accel
30-60
21
44.55
1.43
0.2599
31
Decel
60-30
14
46.63
-2.14
0.1813
32
Decel
30-0
13
16.40
-2.31
0.0592
362
-------
APPFNOIX r.
I ISTING OF L "Af)FD VFHICLF TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 020 1973 CHEv CHEV 350
DFTROIT
IwTcOOOO. RLHP=12.0 IwT=0500» RLHP=l2,0 IhT=5000, RLHPs27.0
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
Nil*
FUEl
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUFL
ECON
1
2
3
1.87
2.09
3.61
73.1
00 . 7
80.9
688,2
760.0
1260.n
3.80
a.53
1.11
11.0
10.6
6.3
2.31
2.25
3.95
27,8
22.8
39.7
690.3
807,8
1278.1
5.13
3.50
0.23
12.0
10.0
6.6
3.32
2.93
0.37
157.9
63.7
76,0
700.0
801.6
1288.7
3.06
2.60
3.56
8.9
9.7
6.2
0
5
6
1.63
1.13
1.1"
26,0
18, 0
12.5
613.5
536.6
0 78,6
2.66
0.62
2.06
13.0
15.6
17.7
1,73
1.60
1.23
9.0
12.2
ti . 6
600,5
503.5
527.0
3.10
5.05
2.91
11.2
15.6
16,5
1.97
2.11
1 .60
16.5
70.5
25.2
609.9
593,7
560.7
3.58
3.26
3,00
13.0
12.0
10.7
7
8
9
2.28
1 .56
1.9 7
182.7
08.7
117.8
526.7
509.8
519.9
2.96
3.38
3.87
10,8
15.0
12.5
2. 16
1.69
2.07
1 09.0
00.0
80.2
558.8
508.7
521 .2
0,00
3.52
o.io
12,0
10.0
13.6
3.19
2.27
2,80
162.8
85.0
177,5
691 .5
678. 1
686.3
5.32
6.80
6.00
9.3
10.8
9.1
1 0
1 1
1 I
1 . ss
2.59
2.07
3b. 1
177.8
56 • 0
586.8
596.2
719.S
3.66
3. 75
5.09
13.7
10.0
10.9
1 .«5
2.59
2.29
25.8
128.1
39.5
619.5
597.7
761.0
3.86
5.10
5.59
13.0
11,0
10.7
2.20
3.56
3.08
67.3
260.7
125.9
765,6
756.9
901 .5
7.60
3.90
7.53
10.1
7.5
8.0
1 3
1 0
15
3.00
1.60
2.0 J
189.0
««. J
38,0
688.9
531.3
660.2
0.U8
3.52
2.13
8.9
10,6
12.2
3.06
1 . 36
1.91
153.8
33.9
?3.5
683.0
569.0
667,7
5.02
3.08
2.09
9.5
10.2
12.5
0.30
2.26
2.59
258.9
83.5
62.2
855.8
682.2
761 .8
5.13
6.06
3.13
7.0
11.8
10.2
16
1 7
1 8
2.66
2.36
1.71
88.8
78,6
35 ,1
1580,8
623.a
600.6
3,88
0.19
3,28
5.1
11.8
13.3
0. Ou
2.37
1 .68
08.7
86.8
25.9
10)6.0
622.9
580.9
3.36
5.28
3. 18
5.9
11.6
10.2
5.29
3.32
2.87
107.0
228. 3
70.2
1605,0
675.2
713.9
5.00
o . 72
0 , 76
1.8
8.5
10,6
19
20
21
1.97
1.90
I."5
"6.8
37.3
212.9
620.0
728.9
602.3
0.81
3,79
2.95
12.6
11.2
9.0
2.03
2.10
2.67
65.3
38.7
160,9
575.9
731.0
690.2
0.90
3.91
5,03
13.0
11.1
9.3
2.82
3.18
3.77
168.7
87.8
227.2
662.0
905.0
832,6
0.61
6.07
5.16
9.5
8.0
7.0
22
23
20
2.39
3.20
2.22
88.1
70.7
89.7
691.8
966, i
509.9
3.95
5.HO
3,88
10.6
8.2
13.5
1.91
3.02
2.09
59.6
ou,7
90 . 0
710.2
965.0
505. 3
0.13
6.09
0.28
10.9
8.5
12.7
3.15
3,63
1 .67
1 30.6
82,7
100.5
88V.5
1079,9
620.7
6.78
8.19
0.86
8.0
7.3
10.o
25
26
27
1.63
2.96
2.08
51.8
61.1
107.0
525.6
900 , 7
602.3
5.75
3.96
5.11
10.5
8.5
11.0
1 .08
2.66
2,78
01.3
0« . 3
130.7
506.0
927.7
670.0
3.75
3.02
5.03
10,0
8.8
10.0
1,52
3.70
0.22
99, 1
87.5
259,8
706,9
1128.5
708.9
5.97
5.00
3.58
10,2
6.9
7.6
28
29
SO
1 .69
2.62
2.20
<11 .0
83.9
90.h
630.7
852.1
520.3
o,0o
6.53
0.38
12.6
8.9
13.2
1.71
2.59
2.29
32.6
23.7
1 39.6
636, 0
916.1
565.0
0.13
6.02
0.50
12.8
9.2
11.2
2.67
3.03
3.28
92.1
68.2
225.2
812.1
1025.0
600,5
6.51
7.10
0.27
9.2
7.8
9.2
31
32
1 .66
3.02
63,0
73.0
541,6
920 .9
3,07
3.31
13.7
8.5
1.53
2.86
37.8
3«.o
570.0
986. 3
3.97
3.70
10.0
8.5
2.66
0.17
105.5
102.2
737 .3
1161.0
5.89
5.00
9.7
6,6
SUM 1.63 5b.fl 573.2 3.60 1J,J
8AG 2.02 85.0 623.U O.OO 11.6
1.60 05.7 591.6 3.93 13.2
2.01 63.6 656.2 0.09 11.6
2.10 91.5 727.6 5.99 10.1
2.91 101.9 781 . 3 5.27 8.8
33
0 . 00
6.0
130.5
0.07
61 . 1
O.OO
2.6
136.8
0. 08
62.5
0.02
8.9
1 38.6
0.08
S7.7
10
a.30
61.5
1613.6
0.53
5.1
3.91
3«.l
1601,3
0.63
5.2
0,05
70,0
1629.3
1 .53
5.0
15
1.09
29.2
882. 1
1 .05
9.5
1 .23
10.0
601 ,2
0.90
10.2
1.02
33.0
918.1
0. 76
9.1
36
0.90
1«.0
558.3
0,58
15. 1
0,63
10.9
551,7
0.63
15.5
0.97
17,8
582.0
0,6ft
10.5
37
1.06
15.0
387 ,0
0.35
21.0
1.13
7.3
017.0
0.09
20.5
1.30
5.1
096.0
1 .09
17.5
38
0.75
8.3
036,9
2.19
19,6
0,86
o. 3
006.8
2,00
19.5
1.27
3.8
588,8
6,02
10.8
39
0.53
6.6
097 .3
5.30
17.0
0.59
a, o
511.6
5.27
17.1
1.61
10,6
710.9
10.72
12.0
EMISSION results IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FUR IDLE)
FUFL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOP IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDRUGEN RATIO
J co
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LUADtD VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLF 022 197 3 CHEV MONT 350
DETROIT
INTsUOOO. RLHP
II
1*4
rv
....
IWTS1500, RLHPsl3.2
....
....
IWT=5000, RLHP
= 27. 1
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CI)
C02
NOX
ECUN
HC
CO
C02
NUX
ECON
1
l.oa
7a,6
526.8
1.80
13.6
2.81
63.1
511.5
1 .94
13.7
2.96
89,4
633,4
2.19
11.3
2
3.19
96.8
680.3
1.52
10.5
2.89
65.1
721,9
2,10
10.7
2.78
105.3
740.8
1 .95
9.7
3
a.27
119.9
968.3
1.31
7.5
5.00
88.0
1023.8
2.08
7.5
1.11
135,2
1113.4
3.03
6.6
(1
2.38
71.2
517.7
1.27
13,9
2,16
60.9
558.7
2.20
13.1
2.57
71.2
635.1
2.21
11.7
5
1.69
<13.6
a68.9
2.12
16.1
1.69
29.2
501.7
3.35
16.0
1 .85
50.4
598.2
2.93
1 3.0
6
1.2?
29.2
161.2
1.55
17.3
J.«3
26.7
506.8
2.57
15.9
1.67
37,6
618.0
2.98
13.0
7
1.72
69.9
196.7'
1.77
H.5
1.81
51.1
529.1
2.59
11.1
2.11
124,1
610. 1
2.43
10.5
e
1.35
67,9
518.9
1.95
H.l
1.18
80.0
579,8
2.62
12.5
2.05
117,8
726,9
4.35
9.7
9
1.63
aa.8
192.1
2.51
15.6
1.81
19.0
533.1
2.81
H.l
2.42
101.6
703,1
3.47
10.2
10
1.36
36.8
571 .7
2.16
H.O
1,60
15.2
608,5
3.30
13.0
2,00
91.0
812,2
4.59
9.2
11
1.92
97.2
551.3
2.IS
12.5
2.21
79.5
603,9
2.50
12.1
3.09
H6.1
785.1
1.87
8.7
12
1 .80
62.0
705. 7
3.09
11.0
2.12
71.8
752.0
4.02
10.1
2.15
150.1
985.9
5. 19
7.2
13
2.26
91,2
629,1
2,61
11.3
2.59
82.3
716.9
3.37
10.4
2.69
154,2
970.6
2.91
7.3
1«
1.17
17,8
531.9
1.99
11.5
2,90
57.7
568,7
2.76
13.3
1.71
102.2
734.2
3.70
9.9
15
2.a#
5«,0
816.1
1.09
9.5
2.27
19.8
150.0
1.60
16.6
2.32
77.0
736.2
1 .88
10.3
16
6.94
167,8
1211.7
1.69
5.9
5.31
121.6
1308.6
2.15
5.9
6.22
185.8
1523.7
2.34
4.8
17
1 .82
73,3
551.5
2.78
13.1
1.99
68.4
560.1
2.14
12.8
2.36
106.1
bBO.3
2.04
10.4
ie
1.37
12,6
565.9
2.59
13.9
1.16
53.3
634.9
2.02
12.3
1.72
83.5
752.8
2.59
10.0
19
1.52
19.6
539.2
2.75
11.3
1.71
51.2
572.1
1.84
13.1
2.29
86,5
680.8
1.89
10.8
20
1.67
19.5
685.5
2.38
11.5
1,9
-------
APPENDT* GiCONT'O
LISTING OF LUAOED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 031 1973 FORD STAw 400
DFTROIT
IWTS5000, PLHPs14,7
I*T=5500, RLHP=14.7
HOOF.
- 1*1=6000, RL HP s?9 , 4
FUEL
NO,
HC
C(1
C"2
I
6.33
23.0
490.2
2
3.67
16.3
678,7
3
9.01
25.6
1074,J
4
3.02
18.9
752.7
5
1 .69
7.2
647.9
6
2.28
1.8
611.9
7
3.01
68.6
617.2
8
2.67
47.8
697.6
9
P. 78
43.5
670.4
1 0
?.68
17.5
674.6
1 1
3.82
79.4
686,5
12
2.95
28.9
848,6
13
«.03
62.5
786.0
14
2.26
19.1
640,8
15
4.79
13.5
589.0
1 6
9.04
37.6
1042.8
17
3.59
40,5
633.2
18
2.20
21.2
810.8
19
3.66
33.4
585.6
20
3.31
26.9
950.6
21
a,99
128.6
726.5
22
3.to
68,1
750.1
23
6,46
50.5
915.3
24
2.31
15.6
675.3
25
2.35
12.7
660,8
26
5.49
20.9
881.0
27
3.1 7
52. 1
765.6
28
2.72
14.1
720.4
29
5.78
22,3
877.2
30
2.55
28.6
669.1
31
2.56
23.7
714,6
32
6.14
27.9
971 .8
SUM
2.64
26.6
677.1
BAG
3.29
#1.6
752.7
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
4.59
3.72
4.28
16.2
9.7
7.0
4.84
3.57
8. 09
5.9
11.2
22.1
549.5
915.5
1142.7
5.75
3,01-
3.19
15.5
¦ 9.4
7.4
4.84
3.86
7.71
61.6
57.6
83.5
583.6
094 .9
1331.7
3.20
3.34
3.47
3.36
5.07
2.86
11.2
13.4
14.3
2.90
1.69
1.37
20,9
14.3
8.1
760.8
683.2
648.4
3.04
5.13
2.44
10.9
12.5
13.3
2,63
1.96
1.66
31,6
23.3
11.6
B31 .7
826.2
759.7
4.22
7.48
4.56
6.57
6.93
7.85
12.0
11.4
1 1 .9
3.21
2.20
2.67
70.3
51.1
28.3
653,6
694,3
681 .0
7.49
6,31
9.00
11.5
11.4
12.1
3.54
3.02
3.64
108.0
92.2
113.4
436.6
040,2
H50.4
7.54
1 1 .54
8,80
7 .89
8.51
8,97
12.5
10.8
9.8
2. 18
3.97
2.92
15.3
93.4
37.4
697.5
709,9
909,2
7.51
9 68
e;77
12.2
10.2
9.1
2.95
4.57
3.63
58.7
199.9
100.0
901 .7
035.5
1056.6
14.35
8.59
9.60
9,78
6.31
3.58
9.9
13.1
14.2
4.55
2.31
5.85
03.6
27.3
18.5
801.3
638.9
634.3
10.36
6,40
3.40
9.4
12.9
13.0
4.86
2.56
5.16
151.7
73.7
42.1
891 .2
850.4
793.8
9 .49
7.59
5.16
4 .98
7.17
3.80
7.8
12.5
10.4
12.03.
3,1 0
2.07
39.5
25.8
13.7
1200.2
679,0
803.3
5.14
7.24
3.54
6.8
12.2
10.7
10.13
3.24
2.70
69.0
67,9
39.1
1415.2
692.>,
922.7
5.86
7,04
4.92
5.75
3,46
7 ,67
13.7
8,8
9.4
3.30
3.05
4,85
26.1
28.4
163,4
628,5
969, 7
791.1
6.72
4.41
7.57
13.1
0.7
0.3
3.39
3.47
4.93
59.3
60.3
ieo,4
676.8
1093.2
H59. i
5.80
5.37
9,36
5.64
6.44
8,58
10.2
8.7
12,6
3.45
7.74
2.43
71.3
52.0
30.2
815,0
950.8
691 .3
7.92
8.11
0.93
9.5
0.4
11.9
3.86
7.13
2.93
107. H
88.9
82.2
1034.8
1119.2
754.5
9.S0
H.H2
7.52
8,30
6,15
9.13
12.9
9.5
10.3
1 .86
8.12
3.53
20.9
26.0
66.6
654.1
855.9
778.6
7,09
5.04
9.38
12,8
9.6
9.9
2.25
6.55
3.B6
57.9
53.3
112.0
044.7
1146.0
866 , 6
13.11
10.02
10.86
7.68
6.13
8.23
11 .8
9.5
12.3
2.99
7.13
2.59
20.7
26.5
37.5
709,4
905.0
703.6
6.87
6.55
10,09
11.8
9.2
11.5
3.12
5,86
3.08
57.3
4 1,9
95.5
907 .7
966.4
743. H
8.56
8.58
8.17
8.41
6.79
11.7
8.6
2. 10
7.69
31.9
37.7
696.5
902.2
6,90
5.53
11.0
8.3
2.44
6.58
75.1
66.2
099.4
1084.9
7.00
5.32
8.12
b.66
12.2
10.7
2.72
3.31
30.6
«S.l
677.4
766.a
0.30
7.01
12.1
io.a
2.89
3.69
56.5
95.8
ftl 1 .4
913.2
8.96
8.16
8.9
6.0
1 4 . 1
8.9
8.5
f.n
7.6
7.2
7.8
9.0
10.1
5. I
11.0
8.9
11.1
7.4
7.7
7.1
6.9
9.9
9 .1
7.1
8 ,
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING MF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 030 1973 FORD LTD 400
DETROIT
IWTauSOO, RLHP=1«,0 - — - ---- IMTsSOOO. RLHPclq.O --— I*Tn5b00, RLHP=20.3
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
N[1X
FUEL
ECON
HC
Cll
CCI2
NMX
FUEL
ECON
1
5.45
164.9
579,6
3,58
10.4
4,64
138,1
615.4
3.80
10.5
4.41
141.0
610.5
4.02
10.5
2
4.51
75.2
746.5
3.21
10.1
3,96
57.7
824.0
3.51
9,6
4.20
60.7
833.5
5.69
9,4
3
9.12
246.0
1003.4
4.13
6.3
8,IS
190.7
1085.8
3.68
6.3
8,58
208,9
1134.2
4.80
6.0
4
3.87
92.1
779.5
3.15
9.5
3.02
67,5
714.0
2.62
10.7
3.07
60,0
752.3
2.80
10.4
5
1.96
23.8
588,8
4.29
14.0
1.87
15,8
603.3
5.17
14.0
2.02
13.8
671.4
7.10
12.7
6
1.85
9.0
532.6
4.11
16. 1
1.93
7.8
544,9
5.84
15.8
2.15
7.7
681 .5
4.46
12.7
7
2.32
29.5
610.7
7.32
13.4
2.36
30.0
624.8
6.87
11.1
2.80
39.7
694.8
7.78
11.6
8
2.1 J
28.1
614,7
7.31
13.3
2.25
44.5
658,2
6,14
12.1
2.84
75.8
844.8
6.70
9.1
9
2.45
14.7
612.3
7.80
13.8
2.61
21.4
634.9
6.26
13.1
3.29
44,9
764.3
6.86
10.5
10
2.73
11.4
639.1
8,49
13,3
2.69
15.0
665.4
7.59
12.7
3.23
47,8
881 .3
6.82
9.2
1 1
3.41
69.9
657.6
7.44
11.4
3,65
80,7
677.S
6.69
10.9
4,14
117.7
797. 1
7.25
8.9
12
3.57
29.3
793.0
8.83
10.4
3.70
44 , 0
826.8
9,64
9.8
4. 30
88.6
1100,7
8.H9
7.1
13
3.92
50.6
775.9
8.94
10.2
4.26
60.4
822.9
9.67
9.5
5,08
125,1
90b,3
7.96
7.9
14
2.21
14.2
612,4
5.90
13.8
2.63
21.4
632,5
8.33
13.2
3,09
63.3
809.5
6.29
9.7
15
4,70
38, 1
620.5
3,49
12.8
6.01
49.2
633,9
4.79
12.2
6,15
61 .0
780,8
4,79
9.9
16
11.21
209.5
1100,2
4.15
6.1
13.07
214,3
1107,0
5.70
6.0
14.34
250.0
1295,2
5.70
5.1
17
3.25
76.3
631.8
4.63
11.6
3.55
78.7
657,0
5.15
11.2
3,99
91 .0
683.9
6. 3H
10,6
18
2.48
18.2
662.1
6.25
12.7
2.76
22.4
685,9
6.51
12.2
3.34
36.2
841,4
5,41
9.8
19
2.96
55.2
575.6
4,95
13.2
3.42
62.4
612.2
5.55
12.3
3.86
71.1
639.8
4,79
11.6
20
3.16
23.6
806,4
6.78
10,4
3.52
28.4
833.5
6.41
10.0
4.60
73.0
997.7
5. 1 1
7.9
21
3.47
96.5
747 .2
6,74
9.8
4.33
123.7
769.8
6.55
9.1
5. 16
219.0
665.4
6. M
«, 7
22
3.65
44.0
741 .5
4.41
10,8
4,26
72.4
751.7
8.88
10.1
4.72
238.7
412.2
7.27
11.1
23
7,04
121,0
939.1
3,99
7.7
7,83
132,9
938.7
6.45
7.6
7.96
295.2
530.7
7.42
8.7
24
2.15
12,6
626.3
7.72
13,6
2.42
19.8
645.4
7.09
13.0
3.07
177.7
1 34.5
7,18
21.0
25
1,67
6.7
596,8
4.32
14.5
2.19
12.0
632. 1
6.45
13.5
2.91
196.3
196.3
6, 15
17.3
26
6,76
44.2
859.8
4.42
9.3
7.39
53.3
922.4
6.12
8.6
8.86
283.1
2 42.4
6,50
12.4
27
2.66
34.9
721 .4
7.97
11.3
3.04
43.2
740. 1
8.18
10.9
4.13
211.1
285.6
8. 7u
14.1
28
3.23
16.0
669,0
3.67
12,6
3.63
21.5
672.9
8.52
12.4
3.88
214.7
169.9
6.97
17.1
29
6.29
110.3
864.6
3.82
8.4
6.65
1 16.5
889.6
5.41
8.1
6.81
268.4
449,9
6.66
9.9
30
2.39
14.6
632.8
8,84
13.4
2.50
18.2
668.5
8.61
12.6
3.12
175.5
169,0
7, 70
19.5
31
2.01
9,9
632,8
4,50
13,6
2.47
20,0
646,8
8,94
12.9
3,00
208.2
276.8
6,43
14.5
32
6.47
37.3
880.4
4,56
9.3
7.55
56.1
872,4
7,14
9.0
8.26
300.4
303.7
6.77
11.1
SUM 2.68 30.8 629.9 7,61 12.9
BAG 3.06 39,6 686.7 6.00 11.7
2,87 35. 4 6 <16.2 8.72 12.5
3.42 46.2 724.9 7.30 11.0
3.20 87.8 636.0 7.02 11.3
4,05 87.0 864.4 6,73 8,8
33
0.91
30.7
78.9
0.08
68.3
1.11
33.7
79,8
0.04
65.1
1.02
36.9
75.1
0.12
65.1
34
11.75
391,0
902.3
0,69
5.7
11.78
390.6
951,8
1.06
5.5
13.36
460.0
939.2
1,06
5.2
35
4.53
87,0
851 .8
0.77
8.8
4.66
93.6
833,8
0.87
8.9
5.12
125.2
772.6
0,69
9.0
36
2.95
45.6
600.2
0,72
13,0
2.97
40,9
677.3
2.11
11 .8
3.12
51.6
608.9
0,79
12.7
37
1.58
2.7
454.8
".31
19.1
1.54
2.4
449,1
3.51
19.4
1.84
2.9
511.0
6.81
17.0
38
1 .49
2.9
492.5
2.57
17.7
1.50
2.9
499.0
9.51
17.5
1.98
4.1
670.8
3. 36
13.0
39
1.77
8.1
573.9
15,41
15.0
1 ,76
7.7
577,2
16,01
14.9
1.46
5.7
762.8
9.67
11.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PFR GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
J6o
-------
A PP £ NO I X G# CllNT 1 0
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS 0N
CHICLE 058 1 <373 OLDS 98 155
Df TWO!T
.... IM = 5000, PL HPc 11. 7 .---
Mlint FUEL
Nil, HC CO C02 NOX ECOM
IWT=5500, HLHP=11.7
FUEL
HC CO C02 NUX ECON
¦— IWTibOOO, WLHPs29.1
FULL
HC CO C02 NO* fcCON
1 8.32 20.3 712.5 10.10 11.5
2 6. 10 10.8 719.8 8.61 11,3
3 11.40 37.7 1163.7 9.1? 7.0
a
5
6
7
B
9
1 0
I 1
12
I 3
II
15
I 6
1 7
18
19
20
21
22
23
21
25
26
27
2W
29
30
31
32
il. I H
?. 18
1 .87
2.11
2.01
2.3"
2.37
2.93
2,80
3.*7
1 .99
5.60
n.«9
3.32
2.59
3.08
J. J2
3.19
3.0J
6.57
1.91
1.70
fl.ni
2.88
2.93
7.27
2.22
1.96
7.76
9.0 663.1 9.12 12.8
2.3 597.1 11.08 11, 6
1,3 521,8 7,86 16,7
31.6 627.0 11,77 12.9
19.2 633.7 11,87 13.2
7,8 635.3 11,33 13.6
1.8 655,6 12.12 13.2
7.2 727.3 17.31 11.9
1.9 866.1 17.92 10,1
9.5 829.5 20.10 10.1
3.9 637.8 13.20 13,7
7.2 702.1 B.12 12.1
10.3 1321.9 10,60 6.2
15.1 631.0 15,51 13.3
5.8 713.6 11.08 12.1
10,3 591,3 13.33 11,3
6.8 835.1 12.62 10,1
19.2 776.3 16.57 10,3
19.6 803,3 11.97 10,5
33.7 1000.7 16.91 8.3
1.0 628.1 11.71 13.9
3,0 662,3 13.77 13,2
9.6 937.8 12.05 9.1
9.0 756.2 19.95 11.1
1 .9 731 .8 1 3.06 1 1 .9
22.2 881.8 16.60 9.1
1.7 613.0 16.81 13.5
5.13 23.1 709.1 10.21 11.6
1.16 10.9 801,1 8,61 10,7
8.81 10.7 1202.8 9.69 6.9
3.36 10.6 663.1 9.15 12,8
1.91 3.1 597.1 11,91 11,6
1.69 1.6 537.2 8.33 16,3
2.25 57.6 633.1 11,23 12,1
2.05 33.8 619,8 11.82 12.5
2.57 13.2 629,6 11,17 13.5
2.16 6.5 681.0 12.73 12.6
2.91 10.0 711.5 17.56 11.5
2.93 6.6 901.0 18,79 9.6
3,15 11.7 867.3 21.76 9.9
1.96 1.1 672.U 13.51 12.9
5.63 10.7 655.1 8.12 12.9
11.09 10,5 1217,2 10.60 6.5
3.50 16.1 670,3 11,15 12,6
2.68 5.1 715.8 12.20 12.1
3,31 9.1 517.6 12.31 16.3
3.19 6.8 816,1 13.71 10.2
3,81 117.6 768,6 13.01 9.2
3.59 11.9 828,8 11.75 9.8
7,29 39.1 1000,7 17.06 8.2
2,11 6.1 611.5 15.60 13.1
1.B5 3.6 668,6 11,23 13.1
7.62 11.1 953.6 12.37 8.9
2.81 10.1 779,2 18.11 11.0
3.11 5.8 711,3 13,80 11.6
7.08 26. 1 871 .0 H.8« 9.5
2.21 6.2 617,9 16.21 13.1
10.15 78.B 751.6 9.67 9,8
7,17 50.7 799.3 8.02 9.8
11.62 80,0 1261.9 9.97 6.2
1.20 28.1 731.7 10.66 11.2
2.15 9.2 692.9 11.61 12.1
2.21 5.2 613,2 12,02 13.5
3.27 80.1 737.6 13.50 10.2
2,81 65.0 808,0 15.99 9,7
2,85 29.B 781.1 18,95 10,6
3.08 18,9 1078.2 19,17 7.9
3.71 77,7 850.3 17.50 9.0
3,81 36.8 1075,6 22,83 7.7
1.05 67.0 992.7 21.17 8.0
2.78 31.6 B09.U 17.15 10,2
5,11 16.0 779.8 10.29 10.2
11.87 122.6 1123.7 13.23 5.a
3.63 57.2 760.8 11.32 10.i
3.30 29,6 810,0 11,60 9,9
3,71 31.1 691.2 13.65 11.7
1,25 2H.2 1010.3 17.69 H.i
1.19 197,2 881.1 11.21 7.3
1.80 99.6 1020.0 18.69 7.a
7.81 107.1 1161.H 19.19 6.5
2,81 38.1 755.J 16.25 10.8
2.70 27.2 8«3.1 17.22 9,9
7.31 68.3 1113.1 11.91 7.1
3.61 75.3 869.8 18.15 8.9
1.09 37.9 891.2 16.28 9.2
7.67 111,2 1001.1 15.16 7.1
3. 1 8 71. 1 7 3 6,1 lu, 76 10.J
3,6
10,2
701.1 13,37 12.1
972.7 11.90 8.B
1 ,98
7.36
3.9
11,1
730,5 15,37 11.9
988,1 13,15 8.6
3.12
7.13
59.8 866.3 11.17
97.0 1151.3 13.H
9.1
6.7
SUM
RAG
2.57
3.00
9.1
13.6
656,6 12.30 13.1
717.9 12,77 11.1
2.70
3,06
13,0 670,8 12.18 12.7
20.0 755,9 12.68 11.1
3.39
3.77
39.1 812.6 15.03 10.0
62.0 892.1 11,16 8.9
33
1 .65
5.6
99.0
0,16
77.9
1.85
6.0
100,1
0.25
76,8
2,38
7.0
95.5
0.21
7 7,8
31
22.81
51.8
1211,1
2.32
6.5
21.76
58. 1
1201.6
1.95
6.5
36.73
70.9
1 152.6
2.32
6.1
35
9.21
19.0
770,6
0,81
10.7
9.75
9.7
801,5
1 .05
10.1
10.71
6.1
862.3
1.18
9.8
36
1.92
12.»
531,8
0.77
15.6
6.51
9 • 3
525,0
0,77
15,8
5,61
5.7
581.1
1.11
H.i
37
1.13
3.2
119.3
2.62
19.3
1 .31
3.1
155,H
2.81
19.1
1.19
3.0
528.1
1.71
16.5
38
0.96
2.1
195.7
6,93
17.7
1.21
3.2
526.0
7.61
16.6
1.31
3.5
66 1 .6
13.21
13.2
39
0.89
3.3
593.5
1 3.91
11.8
1.09
3.1
609,5
11,33
11,1
1.71
12.5
798.0
IB.65
10.8
EMISSIUN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PEW MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUI-L ECONOMY IN MILES PEW GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLUN FOR IDLE)
FUEL FCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1J1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
lb'
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 040 197J PLYM FURY 160
DETROIT
IWT=4000, RLHPo13.2
IWTo#500, RLHP
= 13,2
....
IHTs5000, RLHPa27.1
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
9.09
156,7
449.9
1.37
12.2
9.44
164,7
351.2
1,82
13.9
14.44
176.3
404 .0
1.38
12.2
2
6.48
216,1
568.0
1.66
9.5
7.90
201,0
668.6
2.21
8.8
11,09
227.5
672.4
2.27
8.3
3
16.75
305,0
837.6
1.95
6.5
16.06
300.1
801.4
2.53
6.7
20.07
319.2
866.9
2.64
6.2
<1
6.05
122.1
529.8
3,10
12,0
5.02
120,1
542.7
3,63
u.9
6,55
123.3
558.8
3.15
11.5
5
3.49
69.6
488.6
3.59
14,6
3.37
57.3
467,6
5.18
15.6
4,44
84,4
440 .5
3.73
15.1
6
3.38
48,0
447.6
4.05
16.6
3,00
34.1
513,1
4,79
15.4
4.15
79.7
579.2
5,03
12.4
7
4.21
69,7
504. 6
3.08
14.1
4,72
69,4
486,5
3.70
14.5
5.71
103.8
575.1
3.63
11.7
8
4.02
113,4
499.0
3.34
12.9
3.95
110,7
559,7
3.95
11.9
5.54
169,0
703.0
3.00
9.0
9
4.26
63.6
517.3
3.86
14.1
4 , 34
62.4
495.5
4,49
14.6
6.46
112.6
618.6
4.63
10.9
10
4.90
76.5
526.5
3.84
13.4
5,08
74.0
597,6
4.59
12.2
6,91
157,4
7U7.9
5.57
8.7
11
5.78
147,6
546.6
3.48
tl.l
6.26
143.9
505,3
3.30
11 .8
7.73
233.0
618.1
2.80
8.8
12
5.93
110,0
679,3
5,30
10.2
6,56
123.6
717.9
5.60
9.5
9,58
264,7
880 .6
5,86
6.7
13
6,78
144, 1
635.0
3.95
10.1
7,79
171,9
605,2
3,66
9.9
10.28
233,8
723,9
3,85
7.9
11
4.47
61,0
493.2
3,60
14.0
<1.99
101,5
539.0
3,78
12.4
6,61
180.2
601.6
4.15
9.8
15
9,09
125,9
481.5
2.05
12.5
9.29
129,6
535.0
2.37
11.5
9.86
173.4
626,0
2.45
9.5
16
23.58
348,6
987.2
2.65
5.5
22.23
339.5
1000.9
3.07
5.5
?3. 75
395.0
1157.6
3.20
4.8
17
5.73
131.3
520.9
2.73
11.9
6.60
134.4
486.0
2.60
12.3
7.57
206, 1
543. 1
1 .H J
10.0
IB
5.08
88,5
523.3
4.03
13.1
5.72
111.7
560,3
3.75
11.8
6.98
171.5
619.6
3.69
9.7
19
5.70
1 02.1
546.9
3.71
12.2
5.97
119.8
534,1
3.19
12.0
6,99
179.3
536,6
2.41
10.6
20
6.03
62.9
668.6
4.83
10,9
6,94
116,0
691,8
4.19
9.9
8,96
203.0
742 .6
4.27
8.1
21
6.37
161,0
554.8
3.23
10,7
7,62
184.4
615.4
3.28
9.5
9.03
237,8
621 .5
2.H2
8.7
22
6.34
126,6
618.1
3.79
10.6
7,05
152.2
580.3
3.77
10.5
9.19
262.8
766.3
a.03
7.2
23
11.47
177,2
759.8
4.55
8.3
13.93
195,3
763,0
4.96
8,0
14.55
256.6
912.6
4,73
6.5
21
3.99
72,7
510.7
3,97
13.9
4,99
86.7
495. 3
4.U8
13.6
5.91
137.7
561 .8
2.94
11.1
25
3.72
64,6
523.1
4.09
13.9
4.45
81,9
530.3
3.71
13.2
6.39
193. 1
649.0
3.65
9.1
26
11.59
156.5
749.8
3.10
8.6
13,99
170.7
745,7
3.49
8.4
15,10
263.5
791 .3
3.49
7.1
27
5.94
132.1
538.6
3.59
1 1.6
6.51
1 <15.1
613,6
u .20
10. J
fl.17
261. H
6H9.8
2.18
7.9
28
5.97
96.B
562.6
4,05
12.1
7,05
98.5
556.7
3.91
12.1
8.B2
205,2
669,0
3.59
8.5
2"
11.17
166.7
669.9
4,48
9.0
11.61
169,4
699.8
4.39
8.8
1 3.UK
236. 0
807 .6
<1.16
7.3
30
4.31
89.5
506.0
3.62
13.4
5,49
124.4
529,5
2.66
12.0
6.<10
213,9
580. 1
2,«1
9.5
31
4.53
121,6
530.0
3.05
12.1
5.23
138,8
532,8
2.93
1 1 .6
6,97
223,0
628,0
2,99
8.9
32
12.59
199,2
767.7
2,78
7.9
13.54
209.8
760. 1
3.16
7.8
16.32
286,4
1067.3
2.61
5.7
SUM
4.81
86.5
533.0
4.50
13.0
5.39
95.8
538,5
4.33
12.6
6.38
143.3
662.1
5.10
9.8
BAG
5.92
122,4
567.6
3,67
11.4
6.53
1 37.2
589.0
3.92
10.8
6.22
223.9
690.4
3.70
6.3
33
1.61
37.0
63.9
0.04
69,8
2.71
36.4
59.3
0,07
69.2
1 .51
35.3
66.0
0,07
70.3
34
15,73
463,1
896, 1
0,42
5.2
20. 14
517,1
871,0
0,47
5.1
15.27
460,2
908.6
0.52
5,3
35
6.16
250,1
605.6
0,34
8.7
7.55
252,8
666,7
0.44
8.2
5.93
230,1
683,4
0,47
8.3
36
3.96
153,5
519.5
0.33
11.5
4 .05
156.2
519.3
0.35
11.4
4.12
1 34.6
576,0
0,05
11.1
37
3.42
61.3
383.4
1.40
18.1
3.50
66.8
382.0
1.17
17.8
3,88
44.6
475,6
4.33
15.9
38
2,52
5.5
452. 1
8,73
18,9
2.52
8.2
459.8
6.21
18.5
2.77
6.7
592.0
11,89
14.5
39
2.73
24,4
529.7
7.27
15.4
2.88
32.7
521.9
6.34
15.2
3.55
62.5
744.6
7.97
tO.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PEP GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,65 CARBON TO HYOROGEN RATIO
.360
-------
APPFNOIX G.CONT1D
I 1ST ING OF LOADED VEHICLE TFST RESULTS UN
VEHICLF 052 1972 CHEV IMPA J50
DFTROIT
HT = 0500, RL HP
= |0,0
....
....
I*T=5000. RLHP
= 10,0
....
IWT=5500, RLHP
= 28.3
MODE
FUFL
FUEL
FUEL
MO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
ECON
HC
cn
C02
NO*
ECON
1
a.65
59.0
69B.7
5,86
11.0
3.88
00.1
556.3
5.25
10.1
3.86
89.7
628. 7
5,08
11.0
2
<1.16
38.5
782,7
3.99
10.u
3.69
06.7
842.1
«.o2
9.6
3.67
50.9
820.0
5.10
9.6
3
5,96
17.2
1 I 10.7
a.12
7.(1
5.66
77.0
1065,B
0.6B
7.0
6. 1 1
95.1
1 156.8
5. 36
6.7
o
2.60
16.7
636.0
3.at
13.2
2,26
27.8
565.0
3.58
10.0
2.17
27.9
683.2
0.50
12.1
5
o.oo
6.7
572. 1
(I .98
1(1.9
1.03
16.3
533.8
5.30
15.7
1.81
25.0
630,8
6.27
13.1
6
(1,07
1 1.6
51(1.6
a.98
16.3
1.79
15.1
530.3
5.73
15.9
1.90
20.1
622,9
10,35
13.3
7
1 .96
28.7
552.6
(1.80
10,7
2.08
07.0
059.7
1.10
16.0
3.03
115.3
650. 3
6. 19
10.6
8
1 .98
63.9
58B.5
3.9(1
12.8
2.10
60.7
665.1
0,29
11.6
3.06
92.6
775.8
8,21
0.5
9
2.62
3*.3
535,0
6.30
1«.7
2,60
36.2
091.0
5.70
16,0
3.52
103,2
668. 1
7,65
10.5
10
2.56
37.3
582.9
5.89
13.7
2.75
01.8
656, 1
6.56
12.1
3.08
66.2
851 .7
9.82
9.2
1 1
2.(16
«2.2
612.(1
7,(18
12."
3.93
69.0
530,9
O.R8
13.6
3,61
107.5
609 , 0
5.00
9.9
12
2.61
S0.P
758.8
6,80
10,5
3.73
72.2
860.9
6,89
9.0
0,76
122.0
997, 3
10.62
7.0
1 3
2.60
53.7
725.0
8.25
10.9
3.53
73.7
692.1
7.09
10,8
0.53
160, 1
633.9
6 .96
9.8
1U
I ,8ft
(10 . 9
575.1
5.12
13.8
2.(10
. 51.5
59J. 2
0.91
13.0
3.02
78, 1
763, 7
7.71
9.9
15
?. 52
J2.«
595,6
3.70
13.6
3.83
37.1
595,0
0.35
13.3
l.'l
09.6
663,0
5.36
11.6
16
6.73
117.S
1 l«2.(i
(1.79
6.6
8.33
90.7
1109.9
0,(10
6.7
8.19
136.9
1298.9
10.11
5.8
1 7
2.1"
50.5
599.3
6.59
12.1
2,61
00.8
560. 7
7.29
10,0
3.13
79,U
650,0
7,08
11.3
ie
1 .9(1
32.7
653,0
(1.77
12.5
2.02
20. 8
718.3
5.01
11,6
2.31
09 , 1
776.7
6.06
10.3
19
1.96
36.2
596.9
5.81
13.0
2.09
31.3
592.3
7.09
13.7
2.62
52,6
660.6
7.? J
1 1.«
20
2.0 L
00,9
789.6
5.22
10,3
2.02
37.6
806.7
5.39
9.7
3.00
62.2
908. 0
7.07
8. 7
21
3.20
1?5, 1
673.0
0.12
10.1
3.51
1 36,9
616.0
0.56
10.5
0,60
210,1
857 .0
5.65
7. J
22
2.91
92.7
712.0
0.56
10.2
3.75
90.1
7 76.0
5.09
9.5
0,66
1O0.O
905.6
5.57
7.8
23
3.73
B6,6
927.0
6,21
B.3
5.36
92.0
887,0
6.16
8.5
5.50
115.6
1065.3
6.73
7.0
20
1 .99
39,9
590.8
5.76
13.0
2.1 0
05.3
587.(1
5.30
13.3
3.29
130.1
666.5
5.08
10.0
25
2,07
00.0
562,9
6.02
13.9
2,20
09.3
502,7
6,06
15.1
2,99
102,6
751 , 1
7,31
9.6
26
3.97
59.8
831 .9
5.20
9.5
0.16
63.2
662.8
6,31
9.1
0.95
97.9
1059.2
7.95
7.2
27
2.50
59.(1
668.3
8.23
11.5
3.20
95.6
656,8
6,13
10.9
3,«5
159.8
759.2
5. 70
H.7
?6
2.28
(10.0
652,3
5.7?
12.3
2.50
05.0
676.5
6.25
11.7
3.75
100.6
602.8
B. OO
8.8
29
3.20
71.0
860,0
7.23
9.0
3.IB
51.6
899,9
6.90
9.0
0.22
86.0
1018.0
8.90
7.6
30
2.36
05.2
613.0
6,09
12,8
2.97
80.1
578,9
u. 1 0
12.0
3,33
153,2
673.5
0 . 06
9.6
31
2. 39
72.1
567.3
5,99
12.5
2.07
81.7
616.5
6,07
11.6
3.36
109.3
797.5
7.25
9. 1
32
0.00
95.0
887,0
5.50
8.0
0.27
82.7
898,7
5.07
8.5
5.19
127.3
770. 1
7.10
9.0
SUM
BAG
2.13 JJ.7
2.52 58.5
590. I
650. J
5.63 13.6
5.10 11.8
2.27
2,90
39.1
70.1
585.9 5.57 13.6
67J.5 5.32 11.2
2.03 71.5 609.6 6.57
3.68 118,7 797,0 h.27
9.5
8.9
31
0.60
7.7
<>3.1
0.11
8f". 9
0.52
6.8
">1.5
0.10
85,0
0.60
12.5
113.8
0.30
65. 6
30
6.57
110,9
1110.6
0.88
6.8
5.32
93.0
1110.6
0.96
7.0
5.55
86.3
1130,8
1 .06
6.9
35
2.20
25.2
916.8
1 .05
9.2
2.75
08,7
613,4
0.51
12.7
1 .57
19.1
978.1
1 .29
8.8
36
1 .67
15.2
599,6
0,80
10.1
1 .09
16.3
581,1
0,76
10,5
1.23
10.1
619.1
0.66
13.9
37
I .10
2.6
J9S.9
2.0?
21.9
1 .20
2.5
378.6
2.29
23,0
0.65
12.8
600.7
1 .65
13.3
38
1.79
10.9
030,8
0.91
19,0
1.58
7,8
035,7
5.56
19,6
0.11
3.9
767.3
0,00
11.2
39
0.89
5.2
538.9
7.21
16.1
0.91
5.1
519.5
7,83
16.7
0.79
11.2
966.0
9.17
9.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR I OLE J
FuFL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
HJEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A U1.B5 CARBON TO HYDHUGEN RATIO
Joy
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING UF LOADED VFHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VFHICLE 05a 1972 CHtV CAPR 400
DETROIT
.... IwTaUSOO, RLHPsia.O IWT»5000, RLHPB14.0 1*T=5500, RLHPs2B,3 -- —
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC CU C02 NQX ECON HC CO CU2 NOX ECON HC CP C02 NOX ECON
1
U.22
72,8
592.1
5. 15
12.J
3,50
65.8
567,6
3
63
13.0
3.94
75.9
638.6
5.B7
11.5
2
3.01
52.5
775.5
3.88
10.2
2.72
47.5
777,3
3
57
10.3
3.13
50.0
835.2
4.18
9.6
J
5.82
69.6
1182.3
4.01
6.8
5.35
92.0
1120,4
5
35
6.9
5.89
102.7
1202.5
5.58
6.4
a
2.29
36.7
650.0
3.69
12.4
2.23
30.8
599.3
3
89
13.6
2.27
28.5
683.2
4.72
12.1
5
1 .68
1«.2
579.6
6,34
14.6
1.59
12.4
582.2
6
35
14.6
1.81
16.7
660.9
7.31
12,8
6
1 .50
13.7
511.3
5.88
16.5
1.40
12.6
529,8
5
81
16.0
1,99
24,4
637.7
8.44
13.0
7
2. 99
54.0
596.5
6,98
12.8
2.84
27.5
570,6
6
96
14.3
3.71
53.4
645.5
7.67
12.0
S
2.uu
64,0
537.6
7.58
13.7
2.65
62,5
586,5
4
98
12.3
3.69
141.2
720.7
7.12
9.3
9
2.51
33,6
578.3
9.62
13.9
3,16
38,1
555,2
8
83
14,2
4,44
88,2
649,3
8,80
11.1
10
2.57
36,0
591.9
8.61
13,5
3.27
42.5
629,2
7
31
12,6
4,38
108.2
781,1
9.29
9.2
U
3.26
61,3
635.9
8,36
12.0
3,65
64,6
572.5
8
01
12.9
4.46
111.3
723,4
7.41
9.7
12
3.13
63.4
765.5
9.08
10,1
4.14
65,9
768.5
8
29
10.0
5.18
167.8
1026,5
9.73
6.8
1)
3.73
75.7
647,2
9.33
11.4
4.54
80,3
714,6
8
28
10.4
5.26
152.7
868,7
7.53
7,9
11
2.39
51.0
493,9
7,20
15.3
J.25
54,0
569,9
7
17
13.3
3,89
126,5
768,6
7.75
9,1
15
3.26
55.0
609.3
4.57
12.6
6.22
66.3
607,9
4
92
12.1
4.33
90.2
889.2
6.01
8.5
lb
2.66
169.0
1283.0
5.32
5.7
12.16
161.6
1286.8
13
34
5.6
10.88
230.0
1427.7
7.00
4.9
17
3.«6
71.1
636.3
7.50
11.7
3.17
70.5
616,6
6
73
12.0
3.S2
7B.5
691 .9
8.24
10.7
IS
2.3B
#3,3
623.1
4.77
12.7
2.65
39,7
669,5
5
34
12.0
3.30
55.4
767.8
6.89
10.3
19
2.93
54,5
618.9
6,56
12.4
2.84
77.6
604,6
5
77
12.1
3.04
60,9
689.5
7.13
11.2
20
3.9<1
63,a
709.2
4,80
10.8
2.99
56.5
791.1
5
71
10.0
3.88
77.0
908.4
7,07
8,5
21
a.90
120,8
651 ,5
5,98
10.4
3.67
116.7
682.0
5
75
10,1
5.37
190.7
726.1
5,04
8.5
22
3.59
108,6
685.5
5.17
10.2
3.50
98.4
731.9
5
87
9.9
4.92
207 .4
881.7
7,36
7.3
23
5.06
131.8
880.4
6.42
8.0
4.88
117.9
900.2
6
96
8.1
6,31
172.8
1050.2
9.24
6.6
21
2.5"
05.6
572.1
7.37
13.6
2.20
39.3
574,4
7
71
13.8
3.03
72.3
658.4
6.48
U.4
25
2,15
49,7
549.6
6.34
14,0
2.70
47.5
580.5
7
43
13.4
3.77
122.2
731.7
8.65
9,5
2b
<1,98
86,6
624,4
6.46
9.1
5.07
70.1
932,1
7
26
8.4
6.08
118.2
1026.6
6,19
7.2
27
3.a«
78,9
672.4
6.76
1 1.0
3.03
60.2
718.3
8
97
10. S
3.78
87.4
704.1
7.84
10.4
26
3.20
68,4
596.1
6.52
12.4
3.41
59,9
676.0
6
94
11.4
4.38
117.9
855,6
8,49
8.4
29
1.71
106.7
789,3
5.54
".1
4.54
99.3
837.2
6
72
8.8
5.63
127.5
940,7
7.86
7.7
JO
2.80
57,5
517.9
6.50
14.4
2.0?
47.4
646.4
6
97
12.2
3.31
55.2
666,9
6,39
1 1.6
31
2.85
71.3
493.5
7.24
14,4
3.01
71.5
585,2
6
64
12.6
4 , 00
148.2
743, 1
8,33
9,0
32
5.18
102,4
837,9
6,45
8.7
5.41
93.7
920,5
6
58
8.2
6.40
153,6
1080.7
8.80
6,6
SUM
2.52
4 J . 7
582.9
7.14
13.5
2.55
41.3
608.9
7
20
13.0
3.44
76,8
725.3
8,55
10.4
BAG
2,83
68,1
628.8
6 .64
11.9
3.19
69.8
710.7
7
90
10.7
4 , 04
130.9
802.0
7.43
8.7
33
0.62
13,6
88.3
0,12
79.5
0.65
13.1
117,5
0
12
63.3
0.57
10.0
90.9
0,04
HI .8
31
7.10
135.6
1092,0
1.27
6.7
6,44
103.8
1110,0
1
58
6.9
6,42
92,4
1116.6
1.21
6.9
35
1.81
20,3
938.5
0,98
9.1
1,70
18.9
909,2
1
03
9.4
1.53
14.2
940.8
1.08
9.2
36
1.49
16. a
579.1
0.69
14.6
1.33
14.7
608,5
0
72
14.0
1.25
10.0
627.2
0.B6
13.7
37
1.12
2.4
410.0
2.38
21.3
1.07
2.5
411.9
2
38
21.2
1.26
2.7
465.7
3.65
18.7
3B
0.93
3.4
446.8
5.42
19.5
0.98
3.5
463,7
5
57
18.8
1.97
14.7
569.1
10.29
14.8
39
1.7a
14.5
542.3
11.31
15,6
1.59
11.2
544.8
11
50
15.6
3.03
47.0
729.6
13.99
10.9
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FUR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FUR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111. 85 CARBllN TO HYDROGEN RATIO
o7U
-------
APPEND I X G,CUNT'n
IISTING OF LMADFD VFHICLE ttST RESULTS ON
VEHIClt OS7 1072 0(ir)r, POLA 360
DFTROIT
.... IwT = 0000, PL HP=13.2
MODE
Nil.
MC
cn
CO?
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
1
a. 39
83,5
565.0
5.19
12.5
5.70
66,1
2
o. so
67,1
591 .5
0,07
12.5
5.10
06.6
3
7.50
103.6
926.2
0 ,68
7.5
8,07
120,7
'1
3,oa
65,9
562.2
5.63
13.1
3.53
56.9
5
2,56
32.3
501 .2
6.95
15.8
2.64
27.2
6
2. <8
22.2
037.0
5, o 0
18.5
2.00
19.0
7
3,26
-g
•O
a>
536.3
6,29
13.2
3.38
92.6
A
2.82
50.0
086.8
6,26
15.3
2.17
62.a
9
2,9a
32.7
552. 1
8.99
10.5
3.08
01,6
l n
3.16
29.1
530.7
7.80
15.1
3.31
29.0
11
3.18
06.0
637.9
10. 00
12.3
3.53
71.3
12
3.71
36.8
713.8
1 0,22
11.3
3.9S
02.9
1 3
3.96
a 1 ,9
691 .3
1 1.32
11.5
3.81
55.2
1 0
?, 75
26,5
516.7
7.29
15.7
2. 70
28.3
15
0.90
53.1
500.9
0.13
10.7
0,08
oo.o
1 b
1 0.62
186.5
990 . 0
5.05
6.7
10.00
158.0
1 7
3,07
63.6
082.9
6,58
10.9
3.31
60.6
18
3.20
00,6
568.8
6.37
13.7
3.23
38,8
1 9
3.09
65,0
065. 1
6.03
15.3
3.31
58.9
20
0.07
53.7
668,2
7.13
11.6
0. 09
ou.2
21
3.70
93,0
622,6
8,12
11."
0.19
102,5
22
3.90
53.?
639.2
8.09
12. 1
0.20
70.2
? 3
6,60
97.9
789,0
9.57
9.2
6,59
97,9
?a
2,76
39.6
5? 1.1
8,37
15.0
2.83
00.5
?5
2.65
29.3
521 .5
7.23
15.0
2.77
31.9
26
7.00
75.2
731.6
6.1 1
10.2
7.00
66.3
?7
3.32
56,0
577.2
9.02
13. 1
3.00
50.8
28
3.93
02.0
561.2
7.35
13.9
3.87
O0.6
29
6,35
91.0
656,5
7.22
10,8
6.05
86,6
30
2.79
05.8
509, I
7.87
15.0
2.80
00.0
31
2.70
37.1
551.2
7,80
10,0
2.83
35.0
32
6.97
80,3
750,2
6.27
9.8
7.21
72.5
IwT=0500, RLHPs13,2
FUEL
C02 NUX ECON
... IhTsSOOO# RLHP=27,1
FUFL
HC CO CU2 NIJX ICON
600.8 6.60 11,b
661.9 5.60 11.H
982.0 6.13 7.a
569.0
502.2
U66.6
506.6
531.1
507.9
6,06 12,9
8.26 15.0
6.10 17.6
5.92 12.6
6.63 13.9
8,61 11.2
55a.5
626.3
720.1 10.22 11.1
7.78 ia.5
8.8« 11.8
710.0 1 1.32 11.0
536.2 7.50 15.1
536.3 0,61 10.5
533.0
596.3
092.0
705. 1
628.1
673.8
800.0
550.6
537.9
761 .8
620.7
608.9
697.5
505.1
588,0
802.5
5.05 6.8
6.86 13.9
7.17 13.3
5,90 10,9
8.19 11.3
6.11 10.3
7.97 11.0
<>.11 <».l
8.39 10,2
7.61 10,9
6.70 9.9
9.71 12,0
7.85 13.0
8.01 10.0
8.57 10.0
8,30 13.6
7.13 9.0
0.28 88,0 597.7 6.36 11.8
0.03 61.3 700,7 6.30 10.9
7,13 128,2 1013,5 7.12 7.2
3.53 60.1 578.0 6.98 12.9
2,73 35.6 569.2 8.56 10.0
2.66 29.U 552.7 7.25 10.6
3.77 109,3 602.9 6.97 11,3
3,52 69.2 673,0 8.67 10.8
3,81 86.5 635.0 8.95 11.3
3.98 69,7 723.0 9.62 10.5
0.80 173.5 662,7 6.05 9.5
0,98 103,2 922.3 12,00 H.I
5.25 166,0 781.8 8,00 8.0
3.76 85.3 680.7 8.55 10.7
0.95 65.0 657,1 6.30 11.5
11.20 191.7 1162.9 6.86 5.9
3.90 96,8 580.1 7.10 11,9
3.99 70.1 6^9,7 8.58 10.8
3.73 75.1
0.78 68.9
5,17 198,0
5.38 103.7
7,60 137.1
3,35 60,6
3.29 57.1
7.30 79.5
0,01 90.3
0.32 59.0
7.20 100.0
3.68 92.1
3.96 101,1
8.25 125.3
567.7 7.9a 12.7
853.8 10.9? 9.1
653.6 5,19 Q,0
820.0 9,06 H.l
929,0 11,50 7,6
607,2 8,68 12,3
700.5 10.15 11.0
952.2 9.39 8.1
723.0 10.21 10,1
800.7 11.56 9,7
801.6 10.06 9,0
590.1 7.25 11.8
653.3 9,68 10,8
907.8 8.72 7,6
SUH
BAG
3.05
3.06
00 , J
50,0
500.9
589.9
7.20 10.2
7.39 12,9
3.35
i.«2
03.3
60.3
560.6
626.9
7.68 13.5
7.76 12.1
3.69 72.7
0.27 105.9
683.3
73?.3
9.29
8.01
11.0
9.7
33
0.62
10,0
79.2
0,28
65,5
0,57
10,9
76.5
0.08
93.0
0.56
10.6
72.9
0.11
97.2
30
0,9?
158.0
1103.0
0.79
6.5
6.90
176,1
1217.7
1.32
5.9
6.1 1
171.6
1032.0
0,69
6.7
35
3.51
129.5
680.9
0.07
9.9
a.aa
130,9
670.2
O.OO
9.9
3.90
119,2
690.8
0.07
9.9
36
2.73
101.0
089.8
0.J5
13.5
3.62
97.2
098. 1
O.oo
13.0
3.32
'1 . 1
519,0
0,02
11. i
37
2,10
26. 1
016.8
19.1
2.75
19,0
076.6
3.20
17.2
2.07
8.7
076.3
0.87
17.9
48
2.00
30.6
513.6
6,67
15,6
2,90
15.3
588,9
8.95
1«.3
2,96
36,8
681 ,9
1 1 .62
11,8
39
2.08
23,8
081 ,0
8.00
16.9
2.65
18.9
519.9
9 , 0 0
15.9
2.62
33.5
697.2
13.19
11.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN grams PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IOLE)
FUEL tCONOMV IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PFR GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARRON Til HYDROGEN HATIO
J71
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 062 197? FORD STAK 400
DETROIT
IWT=4500, RLHPs 14,0 ---- —— IWT=5000, RLHP = H(.0 IWT=5500, RLHP=26,3
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C112
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CM
C02
NOX
l-UI-L
tCHN
1
0.22
67.1
640.0
1.06
11.7
«.15
57.9
686.7
«.56
11.2
4,61
64,8
695,6
1 o-
1 I-O
1
1
10.9
2
<1.01
48.9
767.8
6,96
10,1
3,89
<15.6
866,2
6,32
9.3
4 .43
48.1
683.7
7.11
<».l
J
6.26
10 3.7
1 160.3
5.44
6.6
6.32
102. 1
1244.7
5.99
6.2
7.14
93. 1
1282.0
7.10
6.1
a
2.93
Ul.8
598.7
2.76
13,2
3.10
<10,6
658.8
5.35
12.1
3.06
35.9
6H2.6
6.35
11.9
5
i.9«
17.3
557,0
a,#5
15.0
1.95
23.8
573,7
6. a 0
l«.
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'O
LISTING I»F LOADED VFHICLE TF ST RESULTS ON
VfcH I CLE 065 1972 MERC MIJNT OOO
DETROIT
.... lwT=a500, BLHPS1U.0
HI10E FUEL
NO. HC CO C02 NOX ECON
I Wis5000 * HLHP=ia.O
FUEL
HC cn C02 NOX ECON
.... Iw T =550 0, RLHP=28.3
FUFL
HC C(1 CU<2 NO* ECON
1 0.02 21,« 918.7 5,01 9.2 0.52
2 $.66 7,1 (>20.9 5, SO 13.8 J.88
5 6.56 05.6 1151.0 6.23 7.1 6,88
22
25
2«
2b
2b
27
28.5 059.6 5.56 17,1
18.2 800.6 7.00 10.0
D6.7 1029.6 7.19 7.9
0 2.76 16,1 688.3 3.09 1?.3 3.03 22.9
5 1.92 12.a 663.7 0.09 12.9 1.92 11.6
b 1,67 1.9 ua1,3 6.00 19.5 1.70 10.0
7 2.39 135.0 779.9 6.38 8.9
8 1.03 HO.7 521.0 7.71 15.0
.35
11.0
2,78
50,3
713.8
9,36
11.0
3.15
95.5
819.6
8.98
9.1
33
0.73
">.1
92,9
0,15
81,0
0,66
6,8
91.6
0,10
85.0
0.59
5.6
90.7
0.22
87.5
30
8.10
B1 .6
1107.8
1 .69
7.0
7.05
90,9
1070.0
l .oo
7.1
8.87
112.1
10 19.8
6.80
5.5
35
0.38
06.8
563.5
0.53
13.6
0.12
55.6
506.7
0. 30
13.7
3.82
32.3
618.2
0.97
13.0
36
2.07
11.0
091 . 3
1.00
17.2
2.30
21.3
050.8
0.70
17.9
2.03
1 1.8
513.5
2.27
15.9
37
l.H
3.1
069.9
3.01
18.6
1 .07
2 ¦ 8
038.5
2.05
19,9
1.36
9.3
567. 1
o.ol
15. 1
38
1.12
5.2
500. 1
7.38
16.1
1.00
0,8
513.2
6.63
16.9
1.30
7.0
620,0
12.38
13.9
39
1.17
0.0
576.0
13.09
15.1
1.03
«.3
580.9
13.06
15.0
0.73
5.3
785.8
19.70
11.1
FMlSSItlN RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1|1,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 067 1972 OLDS 98 455
DETROIT
.... IHTo«500, RLHP=14,0 —— ---- IWT*5000, RLHP=14.0 INTs5500, RLHPP28.3
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUIL
tCUN
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
1
2.21
26.5
745. 1
2.68
11.2
1 .78
<16.8
566,2
1,86
13,8
6.19
82.0
165.7
6.18
11.1
2
2.29
19.1
837.0
5.1"
10.2
2.19
15.9
929.1
1,78
9.2
10.51
30,5
512.7
22.98
11.6
3
3."5
20.a
1311.6
1.91
6,6
2,94
17.5
1271,5
5.02
6.8
1 1 .52
15.7
839.6
21 .07
9.1
a
1.19
5.7
760.5
2,00
11.5
1 .02
1.0
671.1
3.28
13.0
3.31
9.8
821.9
6.12
10.5
5
1.06
9.2
630.0
5,31
13,7
0,83
3.5
566,3
5.16
15.5
3.98
8.8
625.0
8.S7
13.6
6
1.12
«.5
551.7
6.92
15.7
0.90
2.1
605,9
5.09
1«,5
1.10
14.9
639. 1
1.72
13.5
7
2.35
1 19.7
131 .0
5.29
H.2
2.09
172.0
501.7
1.67
11.1
1.77
180,1
717,5
1 .89
8.6
8
2.01
62,5
589.1
9.68
12.8
2.00
61,2
619.7
6.5fi
12.2
2.61
75.5
778.1
5.09
9.8
9
2.25
39.11
602.7
8.18
13.2
2.20
17,9
516.6
7.57
11.8
2.77
199.6
707 .3
5.01
8,6
10
2.05
1 *> .2
650,2
10, J4
13,0
2.19
14.5
684.1
8,81
12.4
2.10
64,8
851,1
4,47
9.2
1 1
2.28
68,0
717.2
7.27
10.7
2,67
131,3
590.7
7.25
11.0
3.33
284,6
746,9
7 .50
7.1
12
2.15
29.0
861.2
13.13
9.7
2.88
41.3
871.2
9.69
9.4
5.28
149.2
947,8
5,69
7.1
13
2.89
71.8
835.5
8.77
9.3
3.09
133,7
792,6
0.20
0.8
1.46
316.4
856. 1
6.82
6.5
14
1 .65
23.0
611.1
9.52
13.5
2.33
38.8
619.2
7.43
12.4
1.29
94.9
710.3
5.81
9.9
15
2.56
20.7
657.1
5.18
12.7
4.03
21.9
67 7 .1
4.31
12.2
2.37
56. 7
736. 1
14.80
10.7
16
5.57
31.0
1500.7
5.96
5.6
7.41
28,9
1519,1
5.96
5.6
12.33
89.5
1589.2
24.74
5.0
17
1.60
19.0
704.7
6.07
12.0
1 ,80
14,8
710,2
8,03
12.0
1 .74
63. 1
761.9
1 .68
10.2
18
1.52
9.7
724 .2
8.22
11.9
1 .59
6.7
742.6
7.99
11.7
2.34
34. 0
828. 1
3.99
10.0
19
1.35
12.6
681 .5
6,60
12.6
1 .34
10.4
644,6
7.26
13.3
4.20
39.4
752. 1
14.16
10.7
20
1.92
9.6
854.0
9,59
10.1
2.31
9.1
854.9
0.53
10.1
8.48
26.6
913.1
8.90
".0
21
3.57
202.2
700.5
4,38
8.6
3.76
254.2
706,6
3.77
7.9
3.13
267.5
832.9
9.29
7.0
22
3,01
79.0
737,9
8,91
10,2
3.62
104,5
746,9
7,30
9.6
6.14
170,3
935,6
6.13
7.3
23
3,81
46.3
1040.6
7,76
7.9
4.14
55.5
1060.7
8.10
7.6
5.30
77.1
659. 3
21.51
1 1 .1
?1
2.1"
23,9
639.6
7,07
13.0
2.10
54.8
638,4
7.49
12.1
4.28
269.4
3 72.6
9.21
11,0
25
1.12
13.3
657.7
9.78
13.0
t .90
24.3
670.6
8.93
12.4
2.59
103.5
109.9
11.78
15.3
26
1.43
23.3
976.0
8.46
8.6
4.55
26.6
993.6
7.57
8.5
10.70
95. j
1066.6
23.53
7.1
27
2.10
47.b
74B.5
9.19
10.7
2.35
59.0
703.6
9.16
10.0
0.90
343.9
717.2
7.01
6.9
28
1 .96
15,0
719.1
9.09
11.9
2.11
27.4
776,2
8.43
10.7
1.13
110,7
816.5
8.57
8.9
29
3.01
22.5
968.1
7.63
8.8
2.89
20.2
995,3
7.74
0.6
1.31
69.5
1081.5
5.63
7.1
30
1 .86
56.0
651 . 1
7,86
1 1.9
2.20
79.8
640. 1
7.6B
1 1.5
0.65
314.2
663. 1
1.21
7.1
31
1 .73
25,8
669.6
7.91
12.1
2.07
58.9
679.5
8.01
11.4
0.74
118.3
765.5
2.08
9.3
32
<1,67
32.5
986.9
6.96
8.1
4.16
55.7
988,4
6.34
8.1
3.07
109.1
1079.9
5.17
7.0
SUM I.69 28.5 668.2 7,73 12.4
BAG 2.19 43.0 726.2 7.81 II.1
1.8J 40.5 670,5 7,68 12.0
2,16 65,J 747,4 7.54 10.J
2,38 98,8 763.3 8,66 9,6
3.36 160.1 835.1 7.65 8,1
33
0,38
2.1
121,5
0.13
70,4
0,38
4.0
128,1
0.05
65.5
0,36
2.8
123.6
0.04
68,8
31
4.16
24.4
1551.9
2.59
5.5
4,02
26.2
1496.5
1.27
5.7
3.75
15.8
H15.9
1.11
6.1
35
2.21
11.3
868.2
0.74
9.9
1.79
9.9
843.3
0.77
10.3
1.62
7.9
894.7
0.98
9.7
36
0.72
5.6
796.8
1 .09
11.0
0.83
5.9
793,5
1.14
11.0
0. 78
4.7
753.7
1.07
1 1.6
37
1.23
4.1
471.2
2.03
18.4
1.17
4.1
464,2
2.15
18.7
1 .46
4.1
510.3
3.66
17.0
3«
0,92
3.0
512.1
6.50
17.1
0.97
3.1
527,8
7.24
16.6
3.02
3.7
641.9
8.49
13.4
39
0,61
3,8
604,5
10,81
H.5
0,71
4,0
607,6
12.11
14,4
0,85
7,1
869,6
16.27
10.0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IOLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
jv»
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING (IF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 070 1171 BUIC ELEC 055
DFTROIT
I«T=0500, RLHPslO.O IhT=5000, RLHP=10.0 IwT=5500, MLHP=2B,J
MPDE FUEL FUEL HJEL
NO. HC CO C02 Nil* ECON HC CO C02 NOX ECON hC CO CO.! NO* tCIIN
1 8.35 108,3 528.2 3,07 11,J 7.(11 102,8 073,1 J,58 12.3 7. 1b 127,J 397.8 7.83 10,3
2 6.06 13 3,9 638.6 2.66 10.2 6,81 107.8 690.3 3.27 9.0 5.86 9J.9 801.1 5.57 8.8
3 11.ufl 2b/.9 901.2 3.13 6.0 1 3.96 25S.3 1007. 3 3.57 6. 1 12.22 225.0 1003.9 5.58 6.0
0 0.72 68.5 555. 0 0.20 13.1 1.88 90.3 578.0 0.86 12.0 0. 1 2 7 3. 0 558.1 5.95 12.9
5 2,87 <18.0 5<13,3 7.18 10.1 2.88 05,0 569,9 8,<10 13,6 2,a
-------
APPENOIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 095 1"71 CHEV IMP* 100
DETROIT
.... IwT=1000, RLHP»13.2 ---• IWT«1500, RLHPo13,2 .... ---- 1*7=5000, RLHPo29.0
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC CO C02 NO* ECON HC CO C 1)2 NOX ECON HC CO C02 NOX FCON
1 3.66 7.a 611.2 7.00 13.1 J.02 17.7 702,1 8,12 12.0 6.16 79.0 639.1 3.92 11,3
2 5,51 12.0 767.h 6.67 11.0 2,79 16.0 797,5 7.28 10.7 9.13 1J0.7 618,7 5.76 10.2
3 5.90 11.7 1211.0 8.91 7.1 1.77 22.1 1291,a 9.81 6.6 12.18 157.7 1282.7 10.06 5.7
1 1.50 8.7 578.8 5.13 11,6 . 2,08 15,0 597.8 5,79 11.1 1,15 61,6 620,3 7.10 12,1
5 1.67 10,6 181.1 6,66 17,5 1.19 12,8 501.9 7.01 16.9 2,51 11.7 517.3 9.IP 11.2
6 1,51 9,8 197. 1 5.58 17.2 1,28 10.5 198,7 5.95 17, 1 2.63 18,7 592.1 6.21 l».l
7 2,00 63,9 529,8 6.1« 13,9 2,29 86.3 537.2 5,17 13.0 1,56 131,1 589,0 6,71 11,0
8 1.87 11.2 510.7 8.25 11.1 1.91 59.8 533.1 7,70 11.0 5.12 111.9 733.6 10.86 9.6
9 1.57 26,1 516,8 9.33 15.7 t,80 12.0 513.7 8.67 1«.7 3,91 110.1 665.9 10.11 10.1
10 1.61 20.0 581,5 9.01 1«.« 1.77 27.1 607.2 9.81 13.5 1.78 91.1 822.6 11.01 9,0
11 1.88 51,1 578,3 9.08 13.1 2.07 15.9 650,7 10.11 12.5 5.16 202.b 669.7 6.01 8.8
12 2.16 35.2 725.8 11.66 11,1 2,20 35.3 765,2 12.53 10.7 6.2S 168,1 982.6 11,00 7.0
I 1 2, 11 37.2 701.1 12,61 11 .5 2.61 76.3 752.2 11 .70 10.1 5.H 267.1 823.6 7.81 7.0
II 1.59 22,8 538.9 9.02 15,3 1.72 35.0 517.7 8.63 11.6 3.78 107.1 690.0 10.11 10.2
15 1.93 11,1 603.5 6.21 11.0 2.12 23.7 611.8 6,16 13.5 1.69 95.1 728.7 7.33 9.9
16 5.20 27.1 1110.1 1 1 .69 6.0 5.71 51 ,5 1H2.3 10.10 5.8 11,21 210,6 1511.7 11,01 1.6
17 1.85 13.9 610.8 9,20 13,9 2,11 28,1 661.3 9,35 12,5 8,17 111,1 690,2 7,15 9,6
18 1,57 7.7 590.9 8.62 11.6 1.81 20.1 629.2 8.98 11.3 9.23 101,1 717.2 9.72 9.8
19 1,63 11,0 556.1 7.05 15,2 1,78 21.5 570.8 7.88 11.5 7.00 82.1 613.1 7.81 11.2
20 1,68 11,3 696.1 9,12 12,1 2,17 21,1 771,1 10,65 10,6 10,73 121,1 850,7 11.05 8.5
21 2,65 109.8 618.6 6.88 10.8 1.01 111,1 6B8.1 7.28 9.6 15.58 280.1 732.1 5.00 7.3
22 2.21 50,9 679.3 10.15 11.6 2.61 71.5 693.1 9.86 10.9 22,02 221.9 850.1 9.85 7,0
21 3.21 17.9 920,0 10.86 9.0 3,10 59.6 953,0 12.58 8.1 22.21 lflj.1 1077.5 12.97 6.2
21 1,11 16,1 522,1 8.17 16.1 1.76 27,0 578,2 10.31 11.2 10,81 160,8 621.8 7.39 9.8
25 1.10 15.1 531.6 10,23 15.8 1.65 22.9 566.0 10.21 11.6 15.57 123.1 671.8 9.16 9.7
26 2.75 15.0 878.1 10.18 9.7 3.16 51.8 721.9 6.81 11.3 21.81 163.9 1023.3 9.55 6.5
27 1.81 17.7 631.5 11.98 13.3 2.03 31.1 681.1 12.39 12.0 8.1b 201.6 6H2.1 7.03 8.6
28 1.70 18,6 632.3 9,55 13.3 1.97 29.9 668.6 11.20 12.3 5.35 131.6 786.0 10.65 8.7
29 2,77 21.1 882.0 11.11 9.6 1.15 12.5 929.2 12.56 8.8 8.78 159.1 937.7 11.58 7.3
30 1.58 19,7 528.9 10.85 15.7 2.05 12.2 561.9 10.90 13.9 12.31 211,3 563.9 1.99 9.1
31 1.58 20.8 508.1 9.?6 16,2 1.72 26.2 512.9 9,16 15.1 18.18 158.1 680.7 8.20 9.0
32 3.01 26,1 861.1 9.71 9.7 3.50 11.3 891.1 9.87 9.1 30,73 206.2 1001.7 8,82 6.2
SUM 1.70 21,1 571,1 8,13 11,5 1.03 29.6 595.2 9.21 13.7 5.92 96,8 705.2 9.96 10,1
RAG 1.73 29.1 636.8 8.53 12,9 1,89 10,7 663.1 8.63 12.1 10.37 152.5 716.0 8.20 8,7
33 0.57 1,1 117.6 1.01 58.6 0.57 2.3 119,1 1,10 57.1 0.56 1.6 111.6 1,09 59,6
31 6.25 11,7 1766,1 8.16 1.9 6,25 18,9 1821,3 9.16 1.7 11.87 99.2 2016.9 12.22 1.0
15 2.55 5.0 867,1 2.65 9.8 2.51 5,6 877,1 2.65 9.9 2.53 10.7 902.2 3.0U 9.6
36 1.63 1.3 581.1 1.76 11.9 1,69 2,1 591.8 2.10 11.8 1.68 5.9 589.B 2.12 11.7
37 0.85 2.1 395.1 1,75 22.1 0.86 1.9 108,2 2,12 21.1 1,03 1.0 179,5 3.98 18,1
38 0.77 1.9 018,2 5.23 19.1 0.82 1,0 151.1 12.31 19.2 1,16 16.5 580.9 11,23 11.5
39 1 .28 11.1 193.8 10.58 17. 1 1 .37 15.9 191,2 10.55 17.0 1 .32 1 1 .3 6<*8.6 16,23 12,3
EMISSION RESULTS in GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
•37b
-------
APPFNDIX G» CON T'0
LISTING (IF LOADED VEHILLE TEST RtSIJLTS ON
VEHICLE 088 1 <>71 DOOG CHAR 310
DETROIT
- — - IM = 5500, RLHP=12.3
mode
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
FCON
HC
CO
1
3.56
32.1
560.0
2.99
H.3
3.50
16,5
2
3.67
28,3
619.2
1.09
12,6
3.15
21.2
3.
5.63
52.7
1015.2
3.83
8.2
1.70
22.2
1
2.59
19.3
529.3
3.79
15.6
2.22
15,1
5
1 .90
9.3
198,1
1,68
17.1
1.70
10.7
6
1 .62
5.5
179,1
1.31
18.1
1.55
1.2
7
2.Si
38.5
581,9
5.19
13.6
2.31
51.2
8
1 .96
20.3
537.3
7.08
15.1
2.11
31.2
9
2.15
17.3
568.3
6,71
H.7
1.51
22."9
10
2.51
11.0
5H8 , 9
7.11
11.5
2,61
10.3
11
2.65
39.3
610.1
6,56
13.0
3.21
70,6
12
2.71
15.9
718.1
9,87
1 1 . B
3.29
25.7
13
2.90
31.8
7H.9
7,98
11.1
3.61
71.1
11
1 .98
11.8
539.5
6.97
15.7
2.36
20.6
15
3.89
9.3
572.7
1.10
11.8
1.11
11.0
16
7.75
20.6
I3H.2
6.02
6,5
8,67
18.9
17
2.51
21.0
571 .6
5.31
11,1
2.91
17.5
IP
2.01
9.1
581,1
1.52
H.7
2.21
9.1
19
2.51
19.9
**79.3
5.26
11,1
2.57
23,0
20
2.80
1 1 .1
679.2
5.97
12.6
2.87
10.9
21
3.10
19.9
611,8
6.39
12.1
3.25
102.2
22
3.06
19. 1
665.1
7.16
1 1.8
3.11
36.3
25
5.01
22.8
835.a
6,91
10.0
5.23
31.3
21
1.91
11.3
561 .8
6.63
15.2
2.22
22.6
25
1 ,78
7.1
515,8
7.52
15.6
1.90
10,3
26
5,11
11.3
815.1
7.01
10.0
5,68
6.7
27
2.51
35.7
617.3
6.86
13.0
2.93
59.6
28
2,17
11.9
655.0
7.21
13,0
2.78
1«>.3
29
1.16
21.2
766. 1
6,89
10.9
1.19
17.1
30
2,1 0
?l.i
569.1
6.79
H.5
2.27
25.1
31
2.17
23.1
566,9
6.59
11.5
2.1 7
16.8
32
5.13
22.1
813.1
6,61
9.9
5.59
11.1
IWT=«000, RLHP=12.3
CO?
IwT=1500, RL HP = 2 7,3
NOX
FUtL
ECON
HC
cn
C 02
NOX
3.38
1,89
1.50
12.9
11.9
8.0
1,91
1.17
5.30
89.0
11.6
19. 1
821.9
780. 5
1176.5
1.96
6.1 7
6.19
1,10
5.27
1,90
11.2
15.6
17.1
2.31
1 .91
1.91
28.7
31.1
19.6
665.2
629. 7
581,9
1.63
6.30
10.19
6,02
7.89
7,07
13.2
H.2
11.5
2.71
1.77
2.98
92,9
60. 1
87.1
703 .7
761,3
7H .1
7.73
9.15
6.70
6.30
6.31
10,60
11.0
11.7
11.2
3,02
3.11
1.22
52.8
1 30.3
91.5
H6 3,5
777 .1
1027.0
9.15
6.59
10.89
7.16
7.26
1.81
10.5
15.3
11.2
1.06
2.92
1.25
1 39.5
56.6
38.7
897 .2
762.6
795. 7
7.92
7.97
6.59
6,51
5.23
1.91
6.6
12.5
15.3
8.92
3,61
3,07
92.1
91.8
51.9
1552.6
680.0
710.5
8,76
5.20
7.25
3.73
1.53
6.31
13.3
12.6
10.3
3.51
3.82
3.96
98.1
75.1
153. 1
655.8
811.1
7 7 3 .5
1.80
H , 36
6 .81
8.51
7.37
6.65
1 1.8
".2
13.9
3.83
5.78
2.91
86.6
90.0
91.6
867.9
1079.8
661.6
9.11
8.29
6. 38
7,67
8.03
6.97
15.1
10.0
11.3
2.71
6,23
3.62
59,0
19, 1
1 32.8
715.9
1070.0
785.9
7.11
8.91
6.91
7,78
6,89
6.76
13.1
10.3
15.5
3.15
1,91
3.1 1
18. 7
70. 1
116.7
810,0
976.3
666,6
8,98
7.56
5,80
8.08
8.69
14.8
9.9
2.95
5,81
66, 1
65.6
738,5
1035,2
6.96
8.69
HJfL
601,3
69a.3
5"»2.5
518.0
199,7
581.1
569.(4
573,1
6 09,2
631,7
720.0
510.1
593.0
1287.8
627,9
560.1
622.1
678.0
688,9
685.2
895.5
597,8
552.8
859,2
681 .9
611.9
817.8
612,0
561,8
861,7
9.1
in.3
'.0
10.3
10.0
9.3
8,9
7.5
'.9
5. 1
9 .1
«.6
8.6
7.2
10.9
7.6
8.8
9.6
8. I
7.7
SUM
Bar,
2,07
2,iu
19.0
26.6
577.1 6.87 11,5
633.0 6,65 13.0
2.18 21.5 610.9 7,20 13,5
2.67 38.1 659,1 6.97 12.2
2.6? 55.5
3.20 88,1
75U.9 7.62 1(1,1
812.7 7,17 9.2
33
0.28
5,7
97.8
0,23
85,0
0,32
1.7
123,8
0.19
67,1
0,19
3,6
101,8
0,19
79,9
3u
3.H
15.6
1173.3
1.07
7,1
2.17
35.9
1381.3
1 .19
6.1
1.71
27.7
1297.B
1.07
6 , to
35
1 ,31
?i. 1
838.3
1,07
10.1
1.13
29.7
859.1
0.93
9.8
1.15
56. 1
818.8
1.01
9.8
36
1,51
32.6
600.b
0.85
13.5
1.35
27.3
607 ,7
0.78
13.6
1.66
32.8
610.2
1.05
15.3
37
1,61
11.9
377.3
2.03
21.9
1,63
11.8
127,6
2.66
19.7
1 .61
6.1
111.6
1.86
19.3
38
0,90
5.0
158,6
5.30
18,9
0.86
3.8
500,7
5.32
17.1
1.17
7.0
588.0
9.50
11.7
39
1.16
9.3
510,2
11,16
IS.9
1,06
7.1
575,0
11.86
15.1
1.27
10,9
816.9
8.99
10,6
FMI sSinN *Rt3ULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PFR MINUTE FOR IDLE)
Fllf L ELIIMJMY IN MILES PFR GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IOLE)
FIIFL ECON11MY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON Til HYDROGEN RATIO
J / i
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOAOED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 091 1971 FORD TORI 302
DETROIT
.... IWTBJSOO, RLHPo 11,2 ---- ---- IWT = £>000, WLHP= 1 1.2 IwT=u500, RLHP=25.9
MODE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC Ctl C02 NO* ECON HC CO C02 NO* ECON HC CO C02 NO* ECON
1
3,6a
81.8
a«7.6
5.68
15.1
5,11
75.6
112.0
5,06
16.2
7.12
77.1
526.3
8,18
13,2
2
3.90
H.5
622.9
5.55
12.6
1.95
13.7
638.7
5,66
12.3
6,53
12.1
690.7
7.79
11 .1
I
6,21
130.9
862.9
5.39
8.2
7.98
123.2
811,0
5.39
8.1
10.13
109.1
962.1
7.77
7.6
a
2.78
<11.7
asi.i
1.15
15.8
3.39
31.0
179.6
1.89
16.3
1.31
36.9
516.6
6.86
11,1
s
2.07
16.8
130.b
7,09
19.1
2.19
9,6
112.0
7.50
19.1
2.91
10,0
513.2
10.01
16.5
h
2.18
10.2
ao7,8
6,20
20,6
2.55
8.5
111.0
6.67
19.2
3.20
7.0
510,2
11.13
15.8
7
2.10
23.a
"59,3
6.9fl
17.6
3.11
11.8
158.5
7,67
16.6
3.97
53,7
60U.0
9.30
12.7
e
2.13
21.9
155,8
7,26
17.8
3.17
32.0
191,9
7.30
16.0
1.13
50.0
662.9
13.12
1 1.8
9
2.50
ia,a
uua.o
9.21
18.7
1.55
20.2
170,1
9.28
17.5
1.15
51.8
626,6
1 1 .61
12.3
10
2.80
15.7
507,1
8.50
16,1
1.32
18.7
529,9
8.55
15.6
1,82
16.0
701,5
11.83
11.2
u
2.86
36.9
503.5
9,61
15,6
3.66
18.7
520,2
9.59
11,6
5,28
108.7
653,9
8,01
10.5
12
3.50
2a.o
626,0
11.11
13.2
1.50
30.1
659.6
11 .05
12.3
6.67
83.9
871 .9
16.16
8.7
13
3.«3
35.1
581.7
12.65
1 J.6
1.57
17.9
621 .0
12.51
12.5
5,80
81.5
759,8
12.65
9.7
H
3.09
17,0
173.9
B.ifl
17,«
3.32
21.1
190.9
7 .80
16.6
1.39
19.1
656,1
13.26
11.9
15
a.29
37.a
528.9
5,00
11,8
5,05
39.2
513,3
1.82
H.3
8.26
19.3
705,9
9.28
11.0
lb
10.12
161.0
1038,5
6.5?
6.7
11.81
139.6
1031,3
6,52
6.9
17.18
157,1
1235.9
12.36
5.8
17
3.US
16.5
503.1
1 0.69
15.1
1.30
12.6
513,3
10,69
11/9 '
5.0"
55.7
618,1
12.52
12.3
18
3.12
22.0
183.0
8,17
16,8
3.13
20,2
506.5
8.07
16.2
a ,«u
28.5
632.2
11.50
12.8
19
3.1«
32.9
172.1
9.27
16.6
3.13
31.2
183,1
9.30
16.2
1. oa
39.2
639. 1
12.5U
12.1
20
3.61
27.3
561.0
9.09
11,1
1.11
28.9
616. 1
9.21
13.2
5,07
32.8
771.1
11.69
10.5
21
3.73
,91.7
552.2
8.83
12.5
1.15
90.5
572.9
8,80
12.2
5.25
113,5
660,0
8.63
10,a
22
3.05
39.5
571.0
8.70
13.8
1.11
18,2
597.9
7.83
12.9
5.52
86.9
770 .1
13.85
9.6
23
6.25
81.1
730.7
16,02
10,1
6.12
73.2
760.1
11.37
9.9
7.51
105.B
H91.9
15.01
8.2
2
-------
APPENDIX G.CONT'D
LISTING (IF LrunED VEHIClt TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 091 |971 mERC MUMT 000
nr trmit
.... IWTEO500. RLHP=|0.0 ----
mooe fuel
Nn. hc Co co2 mi* econ
IhTsSOOO, HLHP=10,0
FUEL
hc cn cm mo* econ
IwT=5500, HLHP=30.S
fuel
Hf CO C02 NUX ECON
1 2.60 39.0 528.5 6.16 I <1. f> 2.81
2 ?.3"» 20.0 7 7 3, 1 7 , 39 10,9 2.67
3 S.60 72.7 1139.0 7,09 7.0 0,90
o
5
6
7
8
9
I 0
1 1
12
1 3
10
15
16
17
1ft
1.09 20.1
1.17 8.9
1.03 t>.3
23.6
lb.7
1,77 12,8
1 .81
1 .62
I.9H >1.6
2.12 32.2
2.55 16.6
2.33 26.1
1,86 9.1
5.16 23.7
596.3 7.18 13.8
512.2 10.0U 15,«
520,8 8.50 16,6
592.5 10,9? 10.0
588.0 10. "0 10.0
57U.8 11,<13 1«.8
639.8 11.23 13.1
650,0 11.85 12.5
8 1 9 , U 1(1,01 10. U
790.5 11.32 10.6
596.0 10.85 10.a
603.0 6.85 12.9
7.22 105.0 1315.8 9.OA 5.9
2.25 31.8 611.8 11.16 13,3
1.80 12.8 652.0 10.65 13,1
19 2.06 22.8 576.2 10.28 1U.3
20 2.38 16,8 788,1 12,52 10.8
21 2.28 51.3 729.0 11.90 10.9
50.0 557,7 7.01 13.8 3.03
28.1 780,7 7,75 10.6 3.15
80.2 1159,0 8.59 6.8 5.33
2.20 29.1 623,9 10,15 13,1
1,70 20,3 539,0 11,53 15,0
1.60 10.5 510.1 8.10 16.6
2,19 38.2 621,0 11,30 12.9
1.75 30.5 571,0 8.63 10.2
1.86 18.a 576,7 12,20 10.5
1.97 15.fc 633.3 9.69 13.0
2.19 35.5 677.0 10.07 12.0
2.58 21.0 798.8 12.07 10,6
2.08 35.0 801.0 15.93 10,3
1.89 10.3 609.0 10.33 13.9
3.32 32.5 651,7 6.91 12.0
7.73 133.6 1339,n 9,32 5.6
2,39 01.0 600.5 11.93 12.0
2.05 19,3 667,7 11,05 12,6
2.29 39.0 591.8 10,63 13.0
2.68 26.6 783.3 12.98 10.6
2-66 72.B 731,5 12,67 10.0
59.1 623.2 9.15 12,2
28.1 897.6 11.75 9.3
89.2 1260.3 12.30 6.2
2,35 29.1 662.5 12.25 12,0
1.67 12,1 617,6 10,53 13.8
1,65 9.8 659,6 12.73 13.0
2.73 80.1 682.0 13.02 10,9
2.02 62,0 798,0 10.21 9.B
2,20 03.1 752.9 lb.71 10,7
2,17 38.5 901.2 16.65 9,2
2.03 SI.8 813./ 16.96 9.«
2.61 50.3 1115.7 19,02 7,3
3.20 86.1 958,3 17.13 8.0
2.20 OB.6 795.2 15,09 10.1
3.01 51.5 818.3 11.55 9.H
8.72 160,2 1601.0 15.61 1.7
2.08 07.2 762.3 13.77 10.5
2,10 18.0 862,6 16,02 9,9
2,22 30.9 70O.5 1 u . 2 1 U.6
2.50 25.0 1009.7 19,00 8.0
3.32 128.6 827.6 12.80 8.5
22 2.32 25.8 773.8 12.23 10.8
23 o.2o 59,6 958,5 10,28 8.3
21 1.09 9.2 572.8 11.20 15,0
25 1.61 7.1 608,2 10.91 10.2
26 0.16 30.1 959.6 10.62 8.7
27 1.70 16.9 703.2 13.28 12.1
28 1.91 11,8 700.6 10.65 12,2
29 3.7S 53.3 890.5 10.83 9.0
30 1.51 12.0 600.0 13.50 13.0
31
32
1.68 8.9 592.9 10.71 10.5
J.03 00,1 907,3 11,00 8.7
2. 72 38. 1 76 1 .8 11,71 10.7
0,83 69,0 970.3 17,13 8.1
1.77 10.9 593.9 12.66 10,2
1.81 IB.5 591.8 9.35 10.2
0.35 09,6 1351,2 9.69 6.2
1.88 20,9 680,9 10.33 12.2
2,31 15.8 678.5 10,07 12,5
0.05 53.3 887.9 15.95 9.0
1.78 10,5 620.2 13.88 13.6
1 .89
0.17
13.8
01 .8
599.7 10.39 10,1
928.0 10.86 8.8
2,81 80.0 1000.6 16.10 7.8
0,51 97,0 1 Io 3 , 20.28 h.fl
2.15 29,5 700,9 IS,29 11.8
1.87 35.0 792.2 15.09 |0.o
0.06 59.1 1152.3 16.09 7.0
2.78 77.1 850,5 16,68 9.1
2,36 37,2 933.8 17.20 H.9
0.12 72.7 1103.6 22.5? 7.2
2.52 H.5 726.7 15.82 11,1
2,08
0,00
51.6 792.7 10.59 10.1
70,0 1160.1 17.20 6.9
SUM
Sir,
1.70
1.96
15.6 617,7 8.73 13.7
22,2 698,3 9,09 12.0
1.77
2.03
20.3
27.6
630.6 10.30 13.3
708.8 9.69 11.7
1.99 36.1 793.1 13.50 10.0
2.05 55.7 903.7 11.79 8.9
33
0.05
10.0
115,8
0.36
66.0
0.03
11.3
113.1
0.36
67.1
o.oo
11.7
117.9
0,10
61 . 5
30
S.3J
1 16,a
1290,6
1 .90
6.0
0.88
117.3
1258.2
2.65
6.1
5.28
105.3
1322.1
2.65
5. 9
35
2,58
53.5
688, 3
0,69
>>.0
2,00
63,6
652,1
0,61
11.7
3.15
7b,6
730 .9
2.H
10,3
36
1.00
18.6
576.5
0.71
10.5
1, 00
12.1
621 .0
0 .90
13.8
1.36
12.9
620.9
1 .06
13. '
37
0.88
2.6
027.9
2,26
20.0
0.92
3.7
051 .2
2.95
19.3
1 .25
0.2
091 ,0
0.58
17.7
38
1.06
0,0
096. 1
0.67
17.5
0,98
3.0
082.2
7.60
18.1
l .ao
0.6
651 . 1
10.83
13.0
39
1 .01
0.0
519.1
6,25
16,8
0,81
3.8
558.0
1 1 .50
15.7
0.67
5.3
779,8
12.60
11.2
EM ISSI (IN PFSUITS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FUR IDLE)
Fuel ECONOMY in MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FIJR IDLE)
fuel ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPEND!* G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 100 1971 PONT G TO <100
DETROIT
.. IWT=0000, RLHPs1 J,2
IhT=o500, RLHPslJ.2 ---
IwT=5000, RLHP=27.1
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
1
2
J
5,73
5.23
9.63
96,8
06.7
13b.2
080.7
703.1
978.5
5.65
3.82
3.68
13.6
10.7
7.5
6. 09
5.07
10.55
76,7
63.2
131 .6
070,0
772. 5
1022.7
6.26
0.02
0.13
10.5
10.0
7.0
3.90
0.17
8.25
73.6
36.1
100.3
709.0
735.1
1150.0
2.29
0.30
3.13
10,6
11.0
6.6
a
5
6
3,93
2.75
2.27
02.7
20.7
8.0
602.2
538,2
550,7
3.20
8.02
5.07
12.3
15.3
15.5
3.73
2.58
2.35
73.0
JO.2
12.3
577.0
513.1
583.2
3.76
8.79
6.72
12.6
15.6
10.6
2.98
2.32
2.30
37.3
11.3
6. 3
69 7.0
599.5
575.0
1.97
5.09
8.28
11.6
10.2
15.0
7
8
9
4.63
3.51
3.70
80.6
83,5
32.8
533.0
627.9
600.0
5.18
8,30
10.61
13.2
11.5
13.3
S. 16
3.98
0.13
55.6
96.6
38,9
085.8
602,5
559.0
5.91
9.02
9.71
15.1
11.0
10.0
3.70
3.61
3.11
67. 7
63,1
39.8
596.3
607.8
639.1
0.17
11.10
9.86
12.0
11.7
12.5
10
11
12
3.2«
a.70
<••52
18.9
80,0
52.5
735.9
607.8
872.6
10.07
7.28
12.06
1 l.«
11.2
9.2
3.99
5.39
5.02
28.1
101.8
81.3
766.9
611.3
918.3
11 .87
7,09
13.10
10.8
11.3
8.3
3.12
3,90
3.65
31.9
88.2
58.8
720.8
711.3
876.2
15.50
7.12
13.05
11.0
10.3
9.1
13
10
15
5.10
3.08
6.86
62,2
29.6
50.0
735.3
620,a
612.5
9.00
8.96
0,71
10.5
13.1
12.3
6.69
0.19
8,10
88.7
09.8
63,0
685.0
700.2
667.3
7.23
10.21
5.15
10.5
11.2
11.2
0.02
2.50
5.73
106.0
58.0
59.8
756.0
652.8
606.5
8.29
8.92
5.01
9.5
11.8
12.0
16
17
18
10.82
0,00
3.55
190.0
70.6
23.6
1232.6
359,7
662.3
5.05
7.00
8.00
5.6
18.0
12.5
22. 13
5.07
0.10
190,0
68.1
27.1
1352.6
566,0
710.5
5.97
7.07
8.38
5.2
12.9
11.6
13.21
3.66
3.31
100.1
61.2
27.9
1261.2
633.7
710.3
6,09
7.33
7.05
5.8
12.0
11.5
19
20
21
1.17
0.53
6.30
53.1
31.0
137.9
578.0
793.0
633.3
6,06
9.16
0.65
13.2
10.a
10.2
0.66
5.07
7.15
51.7
32.6
185.6
550.1
592.0
501 ,0
7,60
9,00
0.57
13.7
13.5
10.0
3.62
3.82
5.15
01.7
29.9
107.7
607.1
807.1
656 . 7
6.61
7.93
0.52
12.3
9.8
9.8
22
23
2a
5.07
8.90
3.39
86.8
123.7
29.1
760.8
652.1
569.2
9.90
8.30
10.18
9.7
8.3
10.2
6.50
10.76
0.01
107.3
137.5
38,1
862,9
770.2
508.5
10.91
9.25
7.07
8.0
8.7
15.2
0.75
8,3 i
2.50
102.9
110,1
53.3
768.0
916.5
605.2
10.32
7.99
7.25
9,0
7.9
12.7
25
26
27
2.91
9.62
0.27
21.0
79.7
55.0
637.2
852.3
650.0
9.62
7.20
10.95
13.1
8.8
11.8
0,03
1 1 .26
5.39
31.7
80.9
65. b
551,3
962.9
620 .4
9.07
7.08
8.75
10.5
7.8
11.9
3.12
8.68
0.60
06.6
80.6
71.6
657 .0
870.9
670.2
15.50
10.70
12.76
12.0
8.7
11.1
28
29
30
0.11
8.30
3.66
38.0
111.0
30.5
725.0
761.8
578.2
9.02
7.69
8.68
11.1
9.2
13.8
5.02
9.08
0.92
35.2
121.1
52.0
813.0
857.7
515,0
10.29
8.72
6.28
10.0
8.2
1«.5
0.22
6.91
0,05
37.6
95.5
73.6
703.1
809.7
621 . 1
8.56
7.12
10.21
10.9
8.7
1 1 .8
31
32
3.52
9,69
36.3
89,6
671.0
873,0
7 .62
6,00
12.0
8.5
0.89
11.50
65.6
123.1
710,3
938.8
7.97
6,30
10.7
7.6
3.86
7,90
81 .2
109.2
603.5
801.5
5.11
5.30
1 1.3
8.5
SUM
SAG
3.05 01.9 615.6 9.00 12.8
J.6« 55.J 629.5 8,77 12.2
3.95 «9.7 623,0 8.93 12,a
1,69 71,6 660.2 8.7U 11,3
3,17 <17.3 617.9 9,63 12.1
fl.90 109.5 670. 0 8.35 10.3
33
0,99
25,8
80,5
0,11
71,5
0.76
21.7
83,2
0.10
72.3
0,96
29.8
78.9
0.10
68.9
30
8.17
262,0
1010,5
0,56
6.1
7.50
208.0
1010,5
0.70
6.2
8.22
299.3
1010.5
0,69
5.9
35
3.70
116,0
620,0
0.32
10.8
3.77
113.0
650.7
0. 3o
10.6
3,69
135,7
650.7
0. 08
10.1
36
2.00
07.5
603.0
0.09
12.3
2.38
56.2
638.3
0.53
12.1
2.02
58,3
626.5
0,55
12.2
37
2.40
26,0
332.2
1.35
23.3
2.27
19.7
008,0
1.52
19.9
2.08
6.7
025.7
2.02
20.0
38
1.55
0.7
506,1
6,75
17.1
1,70
20,7
529.5
6.78
15,6
1.01
0.5
509.1
7.79
17.0
39
1.05
6.3
610.0
16,38
10.2
1.31
6.0
599,6
15.80
10.5
1.58
7 .1
616.2
16.61
1«.0
Emission results in grams per mile (per minute for idle)
FUEL ECONOMY in miles per gallon
-------
APPENDIX GftUNTO
LISTING Of LOADED VEHICLE TEST BtSULTS ON
VEHICLE 107 1970 CHEV HUNT 350
I*T=1000, PLHP=I3.2
DETROIT
IMsa500, RLHP=13.2
IwTcSOOOi RLHP=29.0
MODE
Nil.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUFI
ECON
HC
CO
Cli2
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUFL
ECON
1
2
3
3.31
1.26
7.61
l io,a
112.8
207.9
362,7
501.1
730. 1
3.06
3.31
2,78
16.2
12.8
8.2
1.17
ti.au
8.18
131. 1
98.6
219,0
373.0
598,9
756,6
3.23
1.22
3.11
11.6
1 1.6
7.9
3.97
1.59
8.21
1 1 3.6
89.a
201,9
180.2
618.3
866.3
1.57
7.72
5.67
13.2
11.0
7.3
i
5
6
3.23
?.«j
2.18
"7.5
56.3
ae.o
131 .2
383.0
356.2
2.71
5.20
".12
11.9
18,5
20.2
3.3U
2.39
2.50
111,8
S3.7
50,2
105.2
102.8
«27 .1
2.18
5.62
0.99
15.0
17.9
17.3
3.30
2.70
2.85
88."
SI.5
15.8
176. 1
190.5
189. 1
3.57
7.71
7.27
11.2
IS.2
15.6
7
8
9
5.01
2.7a
2. "7
58.5
66.8
US.3
112.1
A 36.7
122.7
5.39
5.81
7.59
17.3
16,1
17.6
3. 1 1
2.81
3.22
65.8
76.«
57.a
397 ,7
488 . 1
116,1
5.05
5.97
6.98
17.1
11.1
17.2
3.29
3.26
3.58
73.8
71.3
66.6
537.5
617.2
571 . 1
7.51
1 0.15
9.38
13.1
11.9
12.9
in
11
12
3.50
3.1 1
1.03
u 3. 1
53. a
51.5
157.6
509,8
606.1
7.13
8,79
9,17
16.5
H.7
12. 7
3.79
3.39
«.01
51.2
65.1
56. 1
520 . 7
178,2
713.9
7 ,116
7.69
10. <10
li.i
15.0
10.9
1.17
1.07
5.06
67.8
120. 1
10U.8
6 6 0,2
593.0
811.1
12.19
7.11
1 3.59
U.i
11.2
8.9
13
<.58
56.9
581.7
10.67
12.9
3.67
70.0
631 ,n
9,117
1 1 .8
3.05
1 06. /
725.3
11.2?
9.8
11
2.97
10.1
151 .9
5.06
16.9
2,89
19,2
153,3
6.65
16.1
3.52
58. u
610.7
1 O.S1
12."
15
S.38
77.6
129.6
3.82
15.6
5.96
97.2
131 .?
3.56
11.7
5.9U
7?.8
565.6
7.77
12.7
1 6
12,17
256, 1
855.1
1.65
6.8
13.27
298.2
886. n
1.00
6.1
13.71
268.9
1020.7
H.27
6 , 0
1 7
3.33
75.7
153.6
6.21
15.2
3.35
90,1
507 ,2
7.33
13.5
1.10
100.2
555.7
7.69
12.2
1 R
3.20
60.5
136.6
5.13
16.1
3.20
65.0
151.1
5.52
15.7
2.08
80. 1
589.8
7.93
12.3
19
3.36
75.9
117.2
5.69
16.2
3.1U
86.8
196,1
6.32
13.8
3.90
96. r
19 8,3
6.28
li.i
20
1.16
77.5
508,6
6.10
13.8
1.19
85.9
515.3
6.13
12.8
1,98
112.0
702.u
8.26
9.9
21
3.37
1 09.9
192.5
7,36
13. 1
3.81
1 30.8
566 .5
5.92
11.3
1.77
157.0
605,9
5.21
10,2
22
3.9
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 108 1970 CHEV IMPA 350
DETROIT
.... INTsQOOO# RLHPc11.2 —- —. IWT=1500» RLHPoll,2 —— IWT=5000, RLHP=29.0
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
FUK
ECON
1
10,32
Hl.l
351.7
7.17
10.6
9.88
134,0
159,8
7,76
12.6
9.97
102,0
130,8
8,18
17.0
2
8.04
76.e
592.6
10.88
12.0
7.51
68.6
619,0
1 1.03
1 1.8
7.71
81.8
753.9
1 1.79
9.8
3
17,86
202,3
773.9
8,91
7.7
12.89
183.7
777,1
9.77
8.0
16.48
195.9
889, 3
1 1.77
7.1
i
5.36
69.5
513.1
9,09
13.9
5.OS
60.a
511,7
9.42
14.2
5.16
75.6
591.2
10,85
12.2
5
3. 17
21.8
505.1
10.11
16.0
2.89
27,8
489,9
12.B5
16.4
3.18
28.5
619.5
1 7,66
13.2
6
3. 57
19.9
<166.8
12.12
17.«
5.05
16.7
465,8
11.46
17.5
3,26
26.4
611.5
16,97
13.1
7
<1.39
<10, J
551.a
13.78
14.0
3.7.1
15.39
362.9
670.9
0.64
6.9
18.92
357.0
641 .0
0,80
7.0
35
5.79
121.1
644.2
0.56
10.4
5.99
136.1
571.5
0.80
U.O
6.89
133.5
588,8
1 .00
10.8
16
1.65
76.7
464.9
0.71
14,9
3.52
75.2
452.2
0.53
15.3
3.42
67.8
512. 1
0.»0
10.1
37
3.73
21.9
425,4
6,32
18.8
1.75
23.0
414.1
7.04
19.2
2.2b
9.1
517.4
12.00
16,5
38
2.04
11.2
501.7
14,68
16,9
2.01
10.5
483.3
13.76
17.5
2.28
24.7
651.3
19.73
12.7
39
2.20
25.3
552.1
16.58
14.8
2.19
26.2
549.8
16.30
14.8
3.77
46.5
797.0
21 .86
10,1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PtR GALLON (MINUTES PEP GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
Jb2
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS MN
VEHICLE 110 1170 FORD LTD 351
DETROIT
IwTsOOOO, RLHP=1J.2 I«T=U500, HLHPsll.2 IwT=5000, RLHP=27.1
HOOF FUEL FUFL FUEL
no. hc cn cn,» nox fcon hc cn cu2 ndx econ hc cn crv nox econ
t 3.70 ?0.3 560.0 1,25 10.7 1.66 20.7 626.5 3.36 13. <1 3,69 30.5 502.7 0,98 15.«
2 J.95 15.9 572.7 6,25 10.5 2.87 28.9 621.6 7.15 13.1 a,05 19.5 706.8 fi.00 11.2
3 5.39 15.7 831.0 0.10 10.? 0.16 39,9 912,0 5.59 8.7 5.20 13.0 1003.7 6.92 8.5
1 2.nil 1 7,7 360.0 1,75 22,3 2.30 23.2 551.5 2.98 10,9 2,01 10,1 563.6 5,78 IS,0
5 1.73 16.ft 039.9 1.51 18.8 2.11 20.7 1190,6 5.02 16,7 2,22 21 .8 520.3 8,90 15.8
6 2,«5 15,6 "52,7 9.UJ ie.3 2.18 18.1 05b.2 9.27 18.0 2.50 17.7 538.2 10,22 15.5
7 2.32 51.5 009.2 3.62 17.8 3.J8 53,8 518,3 1.11 11.5 3,23 103.6 559.3 7,63 12.1
8 3.01 51.U 513.0 7.97 ID.7 2.96 06,2 516,2 9.27 in.8 3,37 60,9 677.8 11.20 11.3
9 3.16 39. 1 1178.7 5,37 16. 1 3.22 32,8 519.5 7. 18 15.3 3.63 85.9 622.5 9.90 n.5
10 0.00 30.2 532.6 iu.09 15.0 3.03 31 .2 551. 1 1 1 .36 ID.5 3.98 05,0 716.0 12.50 II,I
11 2,30 56.9 511,6 3,10 10,5 3.80 69.2 579.2 1.56 12.7 0.03 139.3 637.8 6.HO 10.2
12 <1.55 U2.3 656.6 17.60 12.0 0.22 53. 1 701 .9 10.32 1 1 . 1 5,00 70.9 885.6 13.91 8.7
13 3.37 52.8 655.8 5.15 11.8 0.09 61,9 605.1 7,27 12,0 0,50 120,0 733,0 9,08 9.5
10 3.39 30.5 097.6 13.70 16.0 2.99 36.2 521.5 9.71 15.1 3.56 52.6 608.b 10.39 12.0
15 6,59 30,6 510.5 9.3H 15.1 3.86 36.1 5S2.9 5.50 10.7 0.32 23.8 626.1 6.89 13.1
16 12.02 30.0 1152.8 12,30 7.1 7.58 82,8 109U.5 6.09 7.1 6,00 10.0 1203,0 8.00 7.2
17 2.11 03.1 093.0 1,23 15.6 2.90 01,9 550.9 5.13 10.2 3.03 OA,9 566.0 8.02 13.6
18 3.01 26.2 529.0 11.17 15.3 2.81 33,2 505.7 3.20 J0.6 3.33 30.9 655.8 10.32 12.0
19 2.70 31,0 050.3 3,27 17.5 2.88 01,3 091,6 0.73 15.7 3.16 65.0 S20.6 6.28 13.9
20 0.29 20.8 636.6 10.52 12.9 3,53 39,9 607.0 12.27 12.3 0.06 50.? 659.0 9.93 11.8
21 2. 19 1 1 0,5 588.3 2.6? II.a 3,87 1 03, 1 602.9 0. 73 1 1 .o 0.96 17a.5 62«.l 6.05 9.;
22 0.72 55,5 579,2 11,97 13.0 1,09 55,9 609.7 10,72 11.8 0,62 70,1 826.3 11,63 9.3
23 8,08 05,3 690,9 8,00 11.3 5,90 67,5 770 .5 7, 32 9.9 5,t>0 06.0 80 1 .3 1 1 ,08 9.5
20 ?,31 26,1 510,5 0,50 15,9 2.58 32,6 095.2 6.99 16.0 2.10 72,0 527.0 7.70 13.7
25 3.06 25.8 502.5 13,85 16.1 2.77 32,0 535.3 11.77 10.9 3.31 09.0 690.6 10.73 11.0
26 9.69 25.5 756.9 10,02 10.7 6.02 60,8 772,1 9,36 10.0 6,07 30.6 927.0 9.22 8.9
27 2.63 29.9 395.6 3.78 19,7 3.27 53.6 625,0 7.16 12.3 3.65 78.0 606.0 9,23 12.0
28 3.76 29.8 551.0 16.71 10.5 3.91 al.O 072.0 11.58 16.2 0.06 37.8 760.5 11.63 10.7
29 5.BO 28.8 672.5 6.73 12. 1 5.60 61 ,9 682,7 6.96 1 1 . 1 0.92 26.5 730. 3 9.80 1 1 . i
30 1.96 36.0 509.3 0.22 15,5 2.96 56,6 517,1 6.56 10,o 3,09 76,9 522,8 7,ufl 15.6
31 3. 10 33.0 509,2 1 1 .90 15.5 2,90 02,0 508,6 10.01 10.2 3.39 50.3 710.3 1 1 .09 n.O
32 8.71 28.6 760.3 15.02 10.7 6.21 69.0 705.0 9.25 10.2 8.55 37.0 950.5 10.07 8.6
SUM 2.70 30.8 512.7 7,57 15.6 2.80 35.3 539.7 7.07 10.7 3.08 09.5 602.2 9.32 12.9
HAG 3.21 36.6 563.2 7.57 10, 1 3.27 09,5 590.7 7,80 13. 1 3.60 78.9 701 .5 8.53 10.6
33 0.31 0.9 91.2 0.10 90.9 0.23 2.2 100.0 0.31 80.9 0,29 2.7 107.3 O.uO 78.9
30 3.58 10.2 1090.7 1.06 7.9 0.62 9,9 1003,5 1.06 8.0 |,SJ 6.9 1087.1 1.37 8.0
35 0.85 5.5 701.0 0.85 12.5 0.26 5,6 667,8 0,66 13,1 0,51 2.6 607,a 0,61 13.6
36 0.85 9.0 608.0 1,08 (0.2 0,25 5.9 620.8 0.92 10,0 0.05 3.0 617.2 0.92 10.2
37 1.02 u.2 398.0 2.33 21.7 0.82 3.0 383.5 2.20 22.7 1.21 3.2 016.9 3."9 20.8
38 1.87 17.6 117.9 7,10 19.7 2.66 23.5 510.3 10,51 IS.2 2.28 21.0 506.1 9.20 16.2
39 2.18 26,5 173,2 9.10 17.0 2.20 23,3 009,6 8,10 18.0 2.36 28.2 075.0 12.62 16,8
MISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FijFL ECnNfT'Y IN MlLfS PER GALLON (mJnuTES PER GALLUN FOR IDLE)
FUEL FCONhmy CALCULATIONS assume A in,05 CARHON Til HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADFO VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 115 1970 FL1RD LTD 390
DETROIT
.... IWToUOOO, RLHP«13,2
....
.... INT«O500< RLHPsl3,2
....
IWT=5000, RLHPe29,0
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
t
3.90
52.1
a52.0
3.35
16.2
3.96
30,a
063.7
0.08
16.9
3.78
31.9
497.6
5.10
15.9
2
3.91
<16.7
723.8
3.63
11.0
3.98
17,6
770,5
0.36
10.9
3.70
28,9
818.3
5.93
10.1
J
6.64
89.0
927.2
3.12
8.2
6,30
07.3
932,1
3.91
8.6
6.14
65.1
1012.6
5.07
7.8
a
2.93
39.6
517.8
2.71
15.1
2,80
20,9
503,7
3.33
15.2
2.96
33.2
577.8
0.20
13.9
5
2.23
27.9
aeo.6
a.10
16.7
2.15
ia.9
515.9
a.6i
16.3
2.38
25.8
554.8
6.27
10.7
6
2.09
28.7
a96,7
3.23
16.2
2.13
l".l
516,0
3,69
16.1
2.58
36.0
640,0
6.05
12.5
7
2.65
U4,9
517,0
5.68
10,9
2,96
57.9
547.7
a,70
13.7
3,60
76.8
561.1
5.57
12.S
8
2.2«
13.0
56a.0
0,29
13,9
2,68
62, 1
578,3
3.92
13.0
3.23
91.2
618.8
8.12
9.1
9
2.39
31.1
507.3
5.66
15.7
2.7a
35,8
536,2
5.79
ia.e
3.80
70.3
655.6
7.05
11.3
10
2.69
35.3
599,9
a.57
13.0
1.83
32.3
602.0
5.28
12.7
3.76
80,0
873.2
8.99
8,8
11
2.62
a5.7
503.7
6.90
10.2
3.03
02.3
597,a
7.00
13.2
0,29
110,9
639.7
5.51
10.6
12
3.21
as.3
7a 1,7
6,05
10.7
3.36
39.0
766,0
7.17
10.3
5.18
137.9
1009.9
9.28
6.9
1)
3.26
aa.2
663.6
8.90
11.9
3.57
06.2
668,0
9.03
11.5
5.15
119,4
768.6
7.20
9.1
la
2.32
32.2
551.9
0,67
10.6
2.51
31,1
561,1
5.20
13.9
3,53
87.2
775,8
6.55
9.6
15
3.62
28.9
592.8
2.67
13.7
3.72
19,1
622,2
3.23
13.a
0,02
50.4
709.2
0.75
10.5
It.
8,00
86,0
1120.7
3.63
6.9
7,87
30.3
1163,0
3.89
7.1
9.21
94.9
1300.3
5.96
5.8
17
3.12
ae.o
525.1
5.6#
10.5
3,02
32.8
562,7
6,63
10.2
3.au
ai.a
611.9
8.59
12.9
18
2.73
a2.8
561 .0
3.67
13.9
2.60
33.7
601.1
0.39
13.0
3.ia
49. 1
717.6
6,89
11.0
19
2.60
38.0
sas.i
5.35
la.5
2.73
3a.5
557.7
6.05
10.3
3.aa
45. 8
639.5
7.03
12.3
20
3.33
as. i
668.9
a.«9
11.8
3.38
07.2
692.a
5.27
11.0
a.15
66.2
881.7
7,96
8.9
21
3.31
70.7
599.6
6.61
12.3
3,80
121.5
603.2
5.26
11.0
0.80
1 39. 1
635.5
5.62
10.2
22
3.21
5a.l
668.a
0.91
11.6
3.70
80,5
709.6
5,07
10.5
0.36
117.1
908.6
8.30
8.0
23
5.32
71.9
776.1
6.16
9.6
5,78
ea.o
807.5
6.00
9.3
6,1 3
96.5
936.7
5.76
8.0
20
2,29
31.9
530,9
6,61
15,1
2,00
30.8
571,6
7.05
ia,o
3.22
56. 1
631 .5
7.29
12.2
25
2.08
3a.3
553.6
0.53
10,5
2.29
35.6
597,8
5.26
13.0
2.98
64, 1
772.9
8.37
10.1
2b
0.82
ai .9
855,0
0,29
9.5
5,12
as,a
870,0
0.93
9.3
5.72
61.6
1069.1
7,39
7.5
27
2.57
39.0
601.5
7.66
13.2
2,90
06,5
603,8
9.20
12.2
a. 11
87.5
7 35.2
8.56
10,0
28
2.73
38.0
617.6
5,00
12.9
3.15
00,1
637,8
5.37
12.5
3.66
t.2.1
675.9
9.21
9.0
29
<1,69
57.6
718.9
5.12
10.6
0.90
60,3
739.2
5.99
lo.a
5.09
68.0
887.6
7.97
6.8
30
2.27
31.7
5a5 .6
7.33
10.7
2.39
31,5
505,7
7.35
10.7
3.33
66.0
600.6
7.23
11.7
31
?.20
3a.7
560.9
a.76
10.3
2.5a
«5.2
608.9
3.60
12.9
3.19
75.1
776.6
8.05
9.8
32
1.65
aa. l
837,0
0.98
9.6
5,06
61.6
662,8
5.36
8.9
5.89
76.9
1070.0
7.69
7.3
SUM
2.31
36.9
563.6
0.60
10.1
2.07
36,6
593,3
5.02
13.0
3. la
64.9
723. 1
7.08
10.6
BAG
2.50
ao.a
609. J
5.51
13.0
2,88
51.9
606.2
6.03
12.0
3.52
93.8
772.0
7.01
9.5
33
0.51
10.5
77.8
0.09
92.a
0.52
10.1
79.0
0 .1 a
92.1
0.58
12.6
105.1
0.49
69.9
3a
1.53
72.1
960,8
0,58
8,1
a,82
67,5
979,1
0,63
8.1
5,10
79.3
9/7.0
0.79
7,9
35
2.01
26.a
609.7
0,02
12.7
1 .99
13.2
677,3
0,61
12.6
2.21
20.fi
673. 1
0.79
12.5
36
1.36
18.5
500.7
0.53
15.a
1.53
1U,6
580.2
0.76
1U.6
1 .70
21. S
550,2
0.70
15.0
37
0.76
6.a
aae.2
1.35
19. J
0.91
5,5
072,0
1 .78
18.3
1 .02
10.5
520.1
2.75
16.3
38
1.38
23.6
061.5
2.78
17,6
1 .65
29.2
086.1
3.21
16.5
2.09
40.2
580.8
6.37
13.5
39
1.61
37.a
521 .3
0.37
15,2
1 .69
36.7
509,0
5,03
ia.5
1.79
51.9
735.9
10.95
10.8
EMISSION
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE
FUR IDLE)
FUEL ETONOMY IN MILES
PER GALLON
(MINUTES
PER GALLON FOR IDl.t)
FIlFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGF N RATIO
jai*
-------
APPENDIX G.CUNT'D
I ISTING IIF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE Mb 1970 ME«C MARA 029
DETROIT
IwT=o500, RLHP=1U.0 IwToSOOO. HLHPslO.O --— 1hT=S50O, HLHP=30.5
K(10E FUEL FUEL F OF L
NO. HC CO C02 NO* ECON HC CO CO? MUX ECON HC Cn CO? NUX ECON
1 3.28 83.7 525.7 7.?? H.J J,17 86.0 596,6 5.88 12.0 3.30 89.0 571.8 5.03 12.3
2 2.7a 32.1 767 .1 a.36 1(1.7 2, 72 37.0 765, 7 5.15 10. 7 3.01 39. 1 801.6 6.79 9.7
J «.95 115.0 1116.3 0. 58 6,8 3, 70 153. 3 107a,5 6.93 6. 7 5.26 122.6 1150,8 5.92 6.5
U 1.87 19.1 630.2 a,29 13.3 1.89 23.8 662.0 5.87 12.6 2.10 18.5 713.2 6.13 11.8
5 1.60 9.2 525.0 8,11 16.J 1.68 10.6 563,9 7.5« 15.1 1.92 8.5 607.1 9.12 13.3
6 1,76 8.U 505.6 5,61 16.9 1.71 135.a 25.6 6.16 16.a 1,99 11.9 650.2 10.12 13.1
7 2.71 59,2 532.5 7,08 ia,0 2,78 69.1 567.a 6,33 13.0 3.20 77,5 662,8 8.16 11.2
8 2.6f) <16,7 561 ,5 6,67 1 3,8 2,71 63,2 576,6 7.07 1 3, 0 3.05 79, 1 771,1 11.UO 9.8
9 2.85 25.9 526.7 10.56 15.0 3.0U 02.2 563.6 8.69 13.9 3.88 82,a 70U.6 10.90 10.5
10 J.OS 21.7 596.7 8.03 13.9 J.SO 12.6 596.0 8.30 13.5 3.89 67,U flju.b 12.OS 9.J
11 2.9U 35.5 620.7 11.19 12,9 1.10 116.8 6U1 .6 6.98 10.6 5.23 171,a 716.2 5.82 8.9
12 3.78 33.2 786.2 9.92 10.1 a.25 66.0 772.7 9.89 10.0 6.06 105.3 1032.9 12,8a 6.9
13 3.63 aS.8 719.J 13.01 11.1 1.27 92,6 755,3 11.01 9.7 5.89 179,1 8u0.a 9,22 7.8
l« 2.65 23.U 590.5 7.53 10.0 2.08 40.a 577.6 7.96 13.7 a.26 93.1 761.9 10.80 9.6
15 3.93 25.5 6a1.5 a.06 1?r8 0.02 33,1 629.3 «.a9 12.8 a.93 60.a 78U.1 6.5a 9.V
16 7.73 88.0 13U9.7 a.80 5.9 7.69 69.7 1338.0 5.80 5.9 6,22 89.7 1587.9 11.16 5.1
17 2.71 ah.2 571,9 B.57 13.6 2.85 17.7 399,2 9.65 18.a 3.10 63.3 68a.3 10.18 11.2
18 2.52 23.2 613,0 7.65 11.1 2.62 20,6 667.2 8.39 12.5 3.73 U3.1 796.5 10.97 10.1
19 2. 19 31 .3 583,7 7.27 13.9 2.11 29.6 610.9 8. 07 1 3, 3 3 , 2a 71.5 651.2 6.R1 11.1
20 3.16 28,8 756.6 H.a3 10,9 J.U1 29.0 771,9 9.00 10.7 a.97 95.0 905.0 9.9U 8.3
21 3.18 108,6 6a J,7 7.91 10,8 U.jO 150.8 685,7 7,30 9.5 5. 31 212,6 773, 3 6.53 7.9
22 3.85 60,9 701.6 ft.27 11.0 1,39 89,5 721,5 8.09 10,1 5,32 1«6.1 911.8 11.U8 7.7
23 5.87 80,7 flia.9 9.a3 9.2 6,58 95.8 903.1 9,91 8.3 6.80 119.8 1011.7 12,91 7.1
21 2.20 17,} S60.8 9.90 H.9 2,06 21,2 596.6 9.70 13.9 3.52 87.9 651.6 8.06 II.I
25 2.y5 22,0 578,1 7,91 10,3 2.6a 26,1 591,3 8.05 13,9 3,69 88,5 755,H 10,69 9.H
26 5.53 38.6 901.8 6.13 9.1 5.78 12.8 B80.3 6.60 9.2 6.35 79.8 1111.1 9.16 7.1
27 2.75 32.8 657.1 11.81 12.0 3.20 U5.7 673.1 11.10 11.8 O.00 98.1 791.7 11.uo 9.3
28 3.29 31.9 652,2 8.10 12,5 3.76 31.« 601,2 8.65 12.6 0.31 08.3 853.1 11.61 9.0
29 a.BO 72.0 770.5 9, 35 9.8 5,89 90.9 779,9 8.78 9.0 5.92 88.5 950.7 1 1 .97 8.0
30 2,16 20.9 596.9 10,03 13,9 2,67 39.3 620.1 9.06 12.9 3.85 118.7 653.5 b.92 10.a
31 2.63 32.1 615.3 8.56 13,2 2.86 05.5 613.2 8.03 12.8 0,01 108.8 780.7 10.29 9.2
32 5.ja 02,6 909.1 6.72 fl.6 5.69 50,9 916.1 6.60 8.8 7.07 96.5 1095.7 9.00 7.0
SUM 2,08 29.S 601.7 7.89 13.5 2.70 01.3 601,3 7.78 11.1 1.19 68.7 719.3 9.7a 10.3
RAG 3.05 38,0 656.0 8.26 12.2 3.00 58.3 680,9 8.23 11.3 0.29 110.0 820.2 9.?7 8.8
33 0.72 20,2 120.0 0.13 57.6 0.69 20,6 95.0 0.03 65.1 0.75 25.2 105.1 0.07 60.0
30 6.77 201.6 1157.5 1.59 5.7 7,0| 295.3 1151.0 1.11 5,0 8.20 322.5 1150.6 1.53 5.3
35 1.28 20,7 900.2 1.32 9.0 l.BT 51.1 869.u 1.22 9.1 2.03 63.5 820.0 l.ofl 9.5
36 0.38 1,6 783,0 1.22 11,2 0,25 2,6 755,9 1.30 11,7 0,32 2.8 600.2 1,18 ||,0
37 0.65 3.2 057.5 1.38 19,1 0,63 1,5 052,0 1,32 19,1 0,88 3,8 082.2 2.02 18.1
38 1.38 a.6 asT.e 6.70 18.9 1.00 5.2 063.7 6.71 18.6 2.20 11.9 571.2 10.06 la.9
39 2.09 17,8 518,7 9.60 16.0 2,21 20,5 538.2 10.22 15.a 2.39 22.2 713,3 10.50 11./
misSK'N RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FDR IDLE)
fuel economy in miles per gallon imimutes per gallon for idle)
fuel ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CAPRON TO HYOKOGEN RATIO
J05
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RtSULTS ON
VEHICLE 116 1970 OLDS 96 455
DETROIT
.... IHTOU500, RLHPeIU.O
....
.... IWTO5000, RLHPs11,0
....
IWTB5500, RLHP=30.5
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FIJFL
NO.
HC
CO
CP2
NOX
FCON
HC
CD
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
CII2
NOX
EC ON
1
2,««
13.3
533.5
5.04
15.6
2,23
6.6
676.9
5.71
12.6
2.66
34.0
723.9
4,61
11.3
2
2.66
20,0
766.8
5.16
10.7
2,28
7.2
788.4
5.76
11.0
3.10
35.6
889.4
7,58
9.3
3
u.m
22.1
1168.9
5.59
7.3
3.74
11.6
1218.3
6.01
7.1
4.46
33.7
1317.0
7,60
6.1
u
1.87
10.1
617.1
5.76
13.9
1,67
4.6
615.9
6,00
13.5
1 .87
13.2
717.8
7.14
11,9
5
1,44
8.9
118.2
8.32
19.0
1.33
3.9
560,7
8.51
15.5
1.73
12.5
630,1
10,06
13,5
6
1 .63
5.6
51 1 .8
6,38
16.9
1.32
3.5
519.1
6.06
16.8
1.69
9.6
660.9
9,30
13.0
7
2.51
58.2
564,5
8.32
13.4
1.59
93.3
578.8
6.11
12.2
3.61
126.2
667.3
7.28
10.1
e
1.71
31.8
537,1
8,01
11,9
2,16
58.0
556.5
7.27
13.5
2.76
113.8
713.0
9.36
9.5
9
2.13
19.3
566.0
11.62
H.7
2.31
30.1
579.4
10.72
14.0
3.15
• 96.3
701.3
10.11
10.3
10
2.25
10,9
610.0
9.51
14.0
2.47
13,6
605.1
9.76
14.0
2.80
62.2
852.9
11,76
9.2
11
2.16
20,2
651.6
12.01
12.9
2.69
18.5
670.5
10.60
11.8
4,08
181.3
729 ,*>
6.05
8.6
12
2.61
15,8
713.1
11.57
11.1
2,96
27.1
777.5
11.21
10.7
3.72
131,1
1003.2
12,07
7.3
13
2.66
30.5
753.6
12.53
11.0
2,90
36,5
787.1
12.18
10,4
4.25
219,0
669,9
8.11
7.2
11
1.99
15.2
560.9
9.15
15.0
1.99
15.5
561.0
9.37
14.5
2.83
81.4
773,0
10.16
9.8
15
2.<>2
15,6
t>l 5,0
5.91
13.7
2,80
12.1
635.2
6,11
13.4
3.56
53.5
817.6
7.94
9.7
16
6.02
22.2
1260.0
7.53
6,8
5,76
15.4
1301.7
7.92
6.6
8.28
73.5
1687.3
10.38
4.9
17
2.02
10.2
620.7
8,60
13.8
1.99
5.5
635.2
8.85
13.6
2.59
38.7
730,7
9.91
11.1
16
1.92
10,6
708.6
10.94
12.1
1.92
1.7
676.4
9,49
12.9
2.33
19.6
871.1
13.81
9.8
19
1.86
15.3
623.9
8.07
13.6
1.82
1.4
593.9
8,21
14,6
2.25
32.3
731.0
9.33
11.3
?0
2.39
29.1
837.1
11.51
10.0
2.37
6.5
821.5
11.05
10.6
2.75
31,9
1000,3
12.15
8.3
21
3.12
151,1
670.9
6.24
9.6
3.41
177.7
676.8
5.69
9.2
3.77
218.3
790, 1
7.67
7.8
22
2.99
89,1
759.3
10,72
9.8
3.10
80.0
722.0
9.11
10.3
3.67
122,9
922.2
1 1 .91
7.9
2)
3,76
51 ,8
1021.3
12.12
8,0
3,5b
02.6
1026,2
10.29
8.0
#.37
73.7
1200.7
13.08
6.7
2a
1.61
20,0
619.1
10.18
13.5
1.71
16.7
621.0
9.57
13.6
2.56
78.5
692,0
8.87
10,8
25
1.68
13.9
628.6
11,17
13.5
1.82
9.1
590.2
10.70
11.5
2.31
63.0
757.1
1 1 . 34
10.3
26
3.73
25.1
974.9
11.36
6.6
4.17
12.5
912.5
9.36
9.4
4.57
59.2
1118.2
1 1 .89
7.2
27
2.20
35.1
705.3
11.79
11.6
2.18
24.1
699.9
1 0.86
1 1.9
3.27
122.6
779.6
8.51
9.0
26
2.16
15.8
751,9
11,91
11.3
2.34
10.2
697.0
1 0.18
12.3
2.91
59.3
869.8
12.23
9,1
29
3.11
15.0
915.2
12.15
9.1
3.21
7.5
917.0
10,39
9.5
3.64
28,8
1095.1
13.12
7.7
30
2.10
39.6
635.3
10, 19
12.6
1.99
31.1
622,5
9,58
13.1
3.33
135,3
671.1
7.55
9.9
31
1.95
29.1
627,5
10,19
13.1
2.02
26,2
601.1
8.94
13.7
2.54
94.3
757,2
9.06
9.7
32
2.11
39.3
982.0
10.18
8.4
4.11
28.6
932,3
9.31
9.0
4.66
91.2
1110.4
9.86
7.0
SUN
1.92
21.2
635.3
9,83
13.2
1.90
21."
616.9
9.13
13.5
2.43
61.5
778.5
10.23
10.1
BAG
2.06
31.1
697.9
8.19
1 1.8
2.15
35.7
692.2
7,88
11.8
2.84
104.9
842.4
7.96
8.7
33
0.26
1.0
110.2
0,36
76. 1
0.24
1.0
1 14,1
0.22
76.2
0.33
5.4
135.9
0.53
61.1
34
3.12
10.7
1271 .3
2.27
6,6
3,69
io,a
1263,4
1.69
6,6
2.78
13,2
1311.4
2.12
6.5
35
1.39
7.9
963.3
1.32
9.1
1.08
7.8
895,5
0.93
9.7
1.33
13.1
972,4
1.19
8.9
36
1.01
6,0
616.9
1.02
13.5
0.70
1.2
580,8
0,62
15.1
0.85
7.6
660.1
0.88
13.2
37
1.22
9.1
461.2
2.99
18.4
1.14
8.9
111.9
2.21
20.5
1 .66
11.7
5H.0
5.38
16.5
38
1.50
1.0
518.5
9.66
16,8
1.34
4.4
196,7
8.34
17.5
1.51
3.9
640,1
1 3.25
13.6
39
1.25
3.8
576,5
13.15
15.1
1.16
3.3
538,4
13.01
16.2
1 .09
4.9
794,0
13.81
11.0
EMISSION
RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
(PER MINUTE
FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY ]
IN MILES
PER GALLON (MINUTES
PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,65 CARBON TU HYDROGEN RATIO
¦506
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TF 3T RESULTS ON
VFHICLE 130 1969 CHEV MALI 350
DETROIT
IM = 3500i RLHPsll.2
MODE
Nil.
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
1
8.90
126.8
071 .8
5.BB
12.7
7.1 0
2
8.16
85.7
507.7
5.90
13.3
6.87
3
13.62
199.8
806.8
2,01
7.6
11,35
u
5.38
71.0
051.3
V . 1 u
15.2
U.5b
5
3.50
33.1
019.3
7.35
18.0
3,18
6
3.20
20.5
371 .7
5.31
21.0
2,99
7
2.07
30.9
O80.3
9,60
16,5
3.05
S
3.27
23.7
010.0
8.35
19.2
3.51
9
3.18
19.5
OOJ.9
10.20
lfl.3
3.22
10
3.87
20,0
060,6
9.81
17.0
0.19
I |
3.68
30,8
530.6
11 ,B5
ia.9
3.70
12
0 . 7 0
33.6
560.0
12,13
10.0
5.23
I 3
0.27
"3,2
582,9
10.20
13.0
0,50
10
3.05
21.6
020.0
9.23
19.1
3,50
15
5.87
65.9
057 .7
5.50
15.3
5,20
16
10. 18
217,6
979.7
7.27
6.3
13.18
1 7
0.31
61.8
097 .7
10.33
10,6
3,98
18
5.19
36.7
035.0
8.00
17.0
3.71
19
5.35
56.0
091 .6
9.09
10.9
3.86
20
6.37
05.0
530 .0
8.10
10.2
0.53
21
3,92
52.5
588.3
12,06
13.0
0.12
22
0.07
38.1
507.5
9.01
1«.3
0.82
23
8.85
102,2
700.7
1 1 .89
9.9
7.06
20
3.09
27,6
<433.1
10.02
IB.2
3.11
25
3.33
21.7
013.8
8,62
19.0
3.00
26
7. 09
91.1
663,2
7.78
10.7
8.56
27
*.67
39.0
516,0
12.83
15.0
o, 08
28
0, 30
35.2
081 .5
8,86
16,1
u • 77
29
6,02
102,8
628,0
10.61
1 1 .0
9.17
30
3.01
29.9
025,2
10.08
lfl.O
3.07
31
i. o l
22.3
036,7
9.08
18,0
3,09
3?
ft.61
93.9
690.1
9.25
10.3
8.56
IHTiOOOO, RLHP=11.2
FUEL
IUT= 0500 > KLHP=25.9 ----
FUF L
CO
C02
NO*
EC ON •
HC
CO
C02
Nil X
118.1
82.3
199,7
096.7
572.5
867,0
6.03
7.27
7,82
12.6
12.3
7.3
9.00
8.10
13.52
130.8
70.6
20O.O
586.7
621 .0
907,9
8.86
10.67
13.72
> 66,1
i 31 ,6
1 20,0
092.8
020.3
386,5
7 .05
8,30
6.32
10.5
18,3
20.0
5.30
3.56
3.69
70.U
25.8
20,8
550.6
520,2
096.1
9.27
11.99
10.82
52.5
39.5
26.4
066.6
031.2
063.7
7.96
7.38
10.00
15.8
17.6
17.2
0.35
5.13
0,87
66,5
80.3
09. 1
589.3
589.0
607.2
9,08
1 1 .30
13.27
31.2
00.6
39.7
063.7
508. 1
599.7
9.50
12.19
12.73
16,9
11.2
13. 1
6.22
0.98
7.08
58. 1
60.0
60.9
661 .0
673.0
817.3
10,63
12.76
18.06
00,7
20.5
61.0
632,9
003.0
503.9
10,60
9.02
6.HI
12.0
18.0
10.0
5.87
5.27
7.50
60,9
50.1
70.7
802.3
631 .H
603 .0
15,66
io.no
11 .50
220.8
60.3
37.2
1050,8
532,9
083,6
8.70
1 1.80
9.26
6, 1
13.9
16.0
17.07
5.05
0.81
250.2
66.7
31.0
1226.1
623.2
591 .8
10.61
1 3.02
1 3.62
53,6
07.1
80.3
516,6
572.0
593,6
1 0.68
10.35
10.05
1«.5
13.0
12.0
0.65
6,16
5,50
55,0
50,5
130.2
610.9
712.7
691 .3
12.39
10.92
8.26
53.8
108.5
27.0
579,0
709,6
060.5
1 0.09
12.80
10.82
13. 1
9.0
17.2
7.10
9.72
3,88
108,3
100.1
35.0
757 .0
903 .0
5/9.1
13.63
16.12
12.27
2". 3
i 88,0
38.7
036,6
707,6
508,0
9.01
9.36
12.60
18,3
10.2
1«.3
5.01
10.09
5.25
52.0
108,6
77.8
592. 6
876.0
691 .9
12.20
21.17
1 1 .89
00,5
101 . 1
29.9
506, 3
665.0
093.6
10.10
11.01
9.59
15.2
10.0
16.1
6.50
8.69
0 . 09
65.1
117.1
55.9
700 .6
800.7
567 .0
10,88
10.80
10.08
26,2
80.5
082.1
730,3
10.10
10.97
16,6
10,0
5,28
10.90
77.0
129.2
613.2
916.1
1 1 .99
15.80
03.5
02.2
075,0
531,3
9,03
8,80
16.0
10.5
0.91
5.27
53.2
71.2
627. 1
678.0
13. 39
10.10
6,0
12.7
1 1.5
11.2
9.5
9.6
5.4
9.7
9.3
7.6
a.
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 131 1969 CHEV STAW ISO
DETROIT
.... IWTSU500, RLHPclO.O
• •••
....
IHTB5000, RLHPa10.0
....
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
cnz
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
1
3.17
90,3
070.8
6,60
10.3
3.57
95.8
029,3
6.91
15.0
3.85
2
3.95
52.7
605.8
9.75
12,0
0,00
60.1
701,7
10.89
11.0
4.11
3
7.09
158.5
906.3
10.89
7.3
7.32
171,0
987,8
1 1.79
6.9
7.38
0
2.89
02,8
500,0
11.62
10,2
3.17
53.1
517,6
10.98
10,5
3.10
5
2.10
11.0
508.9
13.21
16.7
2.17
13.2
500,2
13.06
16.7
2.36
6
2.23
11.3
050.8
9,08
18,5
2.17
10.6
085,2
10.01
17.5
2.52
7
2.56
30.1
551.6
12.06
10.5
2.68
00.3
538,2
1 1.72
10.0
3.03
8
2.52
30,3
500,6
10.06
15.8
2,67
07.5
530,5
10.03
10.0
3,18
9
2.02
17.2
520,7
10,25
15.9
2,60
27.3
522,4
13.90
15.5
3.10
10
2.78
1^.6
555,6
12.90
15.1
2.95
20.1
582.2
13.16
10.1
3,58
11
2.51
2S.6
609.8
16.02
13.5
2.88
07.7
600.5
10.09
13.0
3.07
12
3.17
16,7
688,5
15.91
12.2
3.58
2">.2
709,8
16.91
11.0
0.11
13
2.90
20.1
697,0
18.26
11.8
3.31
37.3
718.9
19,73
11.3
3,88
10
2.32
11.7
516.0
12.35
16.0
2.07
15.2
508,8
1 3,53
15.3
3,04
15
3.59
32,6
553.9
9.21
10,0
3.67
38.5
570,0
9.72
13.7
0,00
16
9.13
157,2
1077.7
11 .22
6.6
9.38
180,6
1089,4
12.03
6.3
10,70
17
2.83
01.6
506.7
12.80
10.3
2.98
09,8
606.6
10.72
12.8
3.20
18
2.65
16.3
565,0
12.65
10.8
2.78
?1.5
597.8
13,29
13.9
3.11
19
2.72
35.1
510,9
11.96
15.3
2.80
01.0
528.6
12,62
10.7
2.05
20
3.00
27.2
6fc3,l
1 3.89
12.0
3.58
30.5
693.0
15,61
11.7
3,90
21
3.30
97.2
613,0
12.09
11.0
3.75
119,1
691 ,6
12.08
10.0
0.11
22
3.07
00.0
650.7
13.19
12.1
3.71
66.7
657,5
1 3.26
11.5
0.17
23
5.33
85,0
617,3
16,65
9.2
5.71
106,6
887,6
19.08
8.J
5.92
20
2.20
11.9
500.9
15.08
15.7
2.02
21.0
590.5
16.06
14.1
3.12
25
2.03
11.0
500.8
13.26
16.7
2.06
17.7
509,8
12.95
16,3
2.93
26
6.06
00,7
768.0
13.30
10.0
5.59
55,8
800,6
10.89
9.8
6,26
27
2.82
25,7
620,2
17.38
13,2
2,83
30,0
669.6
18.80
12.2
3.39
28
2,9b
20.7
591.8
13.76
io.o
3,06
27.2
590.6
10.29
13.8
1,50
29
0,79
72.2
780.2
16.28
9.8
5,00
80,9
821.1
18,91
9.1
5.39
30
2.00
19.7
591.1
15.96
10,1
2, 70
33,1
593,3
10,80
13.6
3.25
31
2.03
18.8
516.1
13.07
16,0
2.79
30.7
500,0
12,59
10.6
3.11
32
5.33
57.8
763,8
13.50
10.2
6,02
73.0
810.9
10.20
9.0
6,53
IWToSSOO, RLHP=J0.5 —-
FUtL
CO?
cn
nOX ECON
96.7 1130.6 8.30 1
-------
APPFNDI* CrCONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 1 33 1969 CHR Y STAW 38 3
DFTPOIT
....
IWTEU500
, RLHP
= 11.0
....
.... IWTs5000
, RLHP=1<1.0
....
....
Iw T = 5500, RLHP
s 30,5
MORE
FUEL
FUEL
"0.
hC
CO
C(I2
NO*
ECON
hc en
C02 NO*
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
1
5.39
105.9
470.3
4.51
13.6
7.40 92.8
162.2 a.51
l«.l
5.59
83.3
156. 1
5,63
2
5.73
93.0
695.8
8.73
10,3
8.02 101,9
708.3 8.73
9.9
6.57
100,6
872. 1
12.US
3
9.71
182.3
895.«
9.00
7.3
13.17 171,1
905.B 11.02
6.8
10.11
171.1
1 120.6
13.50
FUFL
11.7
8.4
6.2
i
5
6
u.iii
3.«1
3.10
86.9
70.1
51.9
517,8
507,2
165.2
6,81
7.57
6.15
12.7
11.1
15.9
1.3a
1.69
4.10
86.8
66,0
61,8
551,3
516.9
471. J
5.34
8.24
6,74
12.6
14.0
15,3
5.09
4.17
4.13
75.5
73,7
111.4
630.2
626,5
612,9
8.82
10.54
7,17
11.6
11.7
11.1
7
8
9
4.19
3,76
3.98
78.3
93,7
66.9
562.7
501,9
5 31.6
9.01
6.25
9,90
12.7
13.«
1 3.6
5,19
".72
5.27
65.9
112,1
77.6
591.7
515,3
542.2
10.48
6,46
8.91
12.5
12.6
1 3.0
5.55
5.27
5.19
100.7
168,9
125.0
677,9
740.0
710,2
1 1,88
8,87
1 1.29
10,4
0.7
9,6
1 0
1 I
12
a. 39
4 . 76
5.60
75.9
1 16. 1
126.?
557.5
595.3
666,0
6.06
7.50
7.76
12.8
11.2
10.1
5,53
6.69
7,01
98.0
127.9
113.5
506. J
619.2
683.5
7.03
7.92
8,3"
12.«
10.5
9.5
5.91
6,49
7,49
156.3
1«0.7
235.1
82« . S
763.5
909.2
10.83
9.1 4
10.47
8.2
8.3
6.4
1 3
10
1 5
5,66
3.99
6.28
1 31.9
91.1
76.7
661 .ft
195,6
510.4
8.ia
6.30
6.15
10.0
13.6
13.0
7.33
5,06
8.26
111.8
102.5
96.8
682.9
509.8
562.9
8,79
6,69
7,03
9.6
12."
12.0
7.51
5,41
7.33
217.6
149.9
110.2
825.2
571.9
753. 7
9.23
8.47
10.06
7.5
10,0
9. J
16
1 7
18
13.61
u. 1 3
a. 18
191.9
1 02.1
1 02.6
109H.J
526.5
552.4
".15
6,36
6.66
6.2
12.7
12.2
18.50
6.59
5,61
213.1
H1.6
106.6
1116.1
531.2
572,4
1 1 .37
6.01
6,92
5.7
11.4
11.7
15,85
5.90
5.89
220,9
152, 1
178. 1
1151,6
627.2
711,0
1 3.07
5,91
6,10
1.8
10.0
8,8
19
20
?1
".17
5.75
5.52
1 09. 1
1)1,6
116,0
501.3
689,6
639.0
5.10
0.65
7.13
12.9
10.0
10.0
6,23
7.33
7.55
109.2
116.8
168.6
526.4
693.5
652.9
5.66
8.65
7.27
12.4
9.9
9 . 0
5.90
7.47
6.92
141.8
217,8
216,6
625.7
853.8
703.2
5,16
7.21
6.81
10.2
7.3
8,0
22
23
24
5.51
9.10
3.91
128,8
1 72.5
86.2
620,2
809,9
533. J
7.06
8.69
7,85
10.6
8.0
n.o
".72
7,56
5.18
153.9
183.6
91.9
635,4
651,0
546.6
6,91
9.20
8.59
9.8
9.2
12.5
7.05
1 0.28
4,91
208,9
212.2
148.3
821,3
979.1
642.2
8.11
9.78
8.21
7.6
6,1
10,0
25
26
27
3.81
^.11
a.99
80 .1
112.0
117.3
199. 1
810.0
587.6
7.11
10.19
7.72
13.9
8,7
11.3
~.80
10,52
~.33
82.8
102.2
132.8
520.7
807.9
610.5
7.52
11.01
7,61
13.3
8,"
10.6
5.05
10.30
6.06
112.2
152,7
178,9
695.1
1071,5
715.2
8.55
14.64
8.30
9.5
6.6
0.7
28
29
30
5.21
8.26
2.32
1H.1
153. 1
"1.7
558.0
731.2
562,5
6,13
8.50
7,38
1 1.8
8.9
12.1
6,29
10.17
5.15
105,3
152.8
91,1
602.9
781.6
616.5
7.57
8.61
8.81
11.3
8,4
11.4
6.44
9.29
5,41
166,8
188.1
145.7
776,1
951 .7
670,3
9.37
10,33
8,17
8.1
6.9
9.7
31
32
3.86
8.14
92.2
1 17,0
513.3
793.6
6.55
8.69
13.2
8.8
1,90
10.83
101.1
127.4
509,4
621 ,8
6.98
11,11
12."
10.4
4.11
7,05
161.7
176.0
669.3
957.2
8.01
12.60
9.5
7.1
SU* «.01 81,1
HAG 1.82 103.8
555.3
587. 3
7.70 12.7
7.02 11.6
5,19 89.3
1.81 112.8
580.1
611.2
6,61 12,0
7.42 11,0
5,23 130,9
6.09 170.6
712,1
782.8
9,97
8.37
9.5
6,3
33
0.57
17.0
75.7
0.00
85,1
0.61
17.0
60,0
0.17
81,7
0.72
17.0
89, 1
0.20
75.2
31
9.72
251.2
1263.1
4.26
5.3
7.43
203.0
1062,4
0.69
6.3
1 0,80
259.1
1484,7
1.26
1.6
35
a. 1 u
97.8
651.6
0.00
10,8
4.57
74.4
735. 3
0.61
10.2
5.10
67.6
706.5
1 .60
9.8
36
3.43
58.8
511.2
0,50
13.7
3.43
19.7
705, 1
5.36
11."
3.24
6.8
794.6
9.49
10.9
37
1 .91
1.8
125.6
8.26
20.?
2.93
14.6
453,1
9.09
18.3
2.61
11.8
541.6
12.21
15.1
38
2.74
13.0
511.9
9.50
11.3
3.35
28.8
513,6
10.17
15.6
3,69
83.7
602.5
9,43
11.9
39
3.0 1
72.1
501.6
8.36
11.2
3,44
74.7
556.9
10.31
13.0
1.19
109,8
601 . 3
1 1.89
10.2
EMlSStON RESULTS IN GRAmS PEP MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FIJFL ECONOMY IN miles PER GALLON JMINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FIIFL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
Jb 9
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE lib I<>69 FORO FAIR 302
DETROIT
.... IWT = J500» RLHPell.2 • --- IMT«aOOO, RLHPo|l,2 ---- IWT>4500, RLHPb25,9
MODE
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NO*
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
1
a.10
ao,9
381.ft
8.2#
1«.J
3.00
41,6
396.0
8.01
18.8
3.46
55.2
457,8
8,10
16,0
i
<1,24
20.7
523,1
8,79
15.6
3.66
24,0
531.4
9.29
15.3
4.60
33.7
623.4
13.23
12.8
3
7.19
86, 1
436.6
8.49
14.9
6,34
68.1
788.6
10.02
9.7
7.38
96.7
864.8
13.32
8.5
<1
3.26
32.0
392,7
7.62
19.6
2.85
29,0
434, 0
8.71
18.2
3.25
29.0
460.7
10.22
17.2
5
2.10
11.3
372.7
10.28
22.3
2.20
9.9
395,5
12.53
21.2
2.56
11.3
459.8
14.88
18,3
6
2.30
a.7
354.3
8.66
23.7
2.22
7.0
368,4
9.J0
23.0
2.78
7.7
476.0
15.19
17.9
7
2.17
26.3
386.5
8.76
20.4
2.72
28,4
431.2
11.12
18.3
3.49
79.4
520.4
1 1 .20
13.5
8
2.32
12.2
410.a
9,94
20.3
2.53
23.4
414,0
9.75
19.3
3.64
43,6
616.1
16.84
12.7
9
2.39
6.1
387.9
11.51
21.7
?,83
15.1
422.7
13.IB
19.5
3.48
52.1
560.2
15.53
13.6
10
2.76
10.9
436.5
11,13
19.2
3.18
10.6
458,9
11.49
18.3
4.21
31.9
672.6
20.50
12.1
11
2.61
37.0
427,5
12.62
ie.o
3.34
25.2
490.8
11,61
16.4
4.29
106.8
579.0
9.46
11.7
12
3.26
13.0
527.3
14.29
15.9
3,90
25.9
546,3
13.95
14.8
5.54
58.8
795.0
21,17
9.8
13
3.10
18. J
516,0
16.11
16.0
3,58
2B.6
570.0
17.13
14.2
5.17
80,1
696.5
IS,04
10,6
14
2.36
8.0
325.2
10.74
25.7
2.54
10.8
418,6
10,87
20.0
3,89
36.1
442.3
16.79
17.4
15
o.ov
25. 4
448,8
7,29
17.7
4.02
26.Q
437.4
6.69
18.1
5.74
36.0
590.1
12,60
13.3
16
9.23
84.3
892.6
9.35
8.4
9,70
103,5
867,5
7,99
8.4
12.91
103.5
1098.2
16.47
6.8
17
3.05
2®.2
421.2
12.22
18.9
3.42
39,9
491,2
14.30
15.7
4.26
46,7
549.7
15.83
ii.«
18
2.85
16.6
408.6
9.17
20.0
2.97
16.2
455,4
10.64
18. 1
3.97
16.2
550.8
16.23
15.1
1*
2.98
25.5
416.7
12.21
19.0
3.17
25.5
479,2
13.30
16.8
4.38
53.6
536.7
11.37
14.0
20
3.50
13.«
1195,7
11,42
16.5
* 3.86
20,0
519,4
12.47
15.8
5.30
33.7
666.5
16.92
12.1
21
3.13
53.2
487.5
11.96
15.3
3.58
55.0
566,7
12,15
13.4
4.94
142.1
618.2
10.48
10.4
22
3.26
21,8
489,9
10.42
16,6
3.35
36.0
5H6.6
10.74
15.5
5.11
63,4
710.1
17.43
10.7
23
5.30
47.9
644,6
13.89
12.0
6.10
63.4
871,0
16,70
9.0
7.41
72.8
847.4
22,93
9.0
21
2.33
9.«
404,0
13.82
20.8
2.61
10,9
449,6
14.85
18,7
3.33
50. 1
534.4
14.07
14,2
25
2.23
7.9
384.5
10. <16
22.0
2.12
7.0
389.7
10.S2
21.7
3.50
30.2
581 .4
16.81
13.9
26
5.58
3",3
606.5
7.15
13.1
6.02
34.3
604.6
10,98
13.1
7,67
46,2
831.7
18.57
9.6
27
2.91
18.il
459.2
15.65
17.8
3.23
33.5
521.0
15.24
15.2
4,07
67.<»
649.9
14.82
11 ,S
28
2.97
14.6
465.0
10,77
17.8
3.37
18,6
454,9
10,22
17.9
4.27
30.3
650.4
17.72
12.5
29
1.82
10.1
586.5
14.21
13.3
5.82
67.2
645.2
16.24
11.5
6.73
52.4
609.9
21.61
12.4
30
2.40
10,5
425,6
14,36
19,7
2.80
15.0
469,2
12.55
17.7
3,61
69.6
535.0
11.97
13.5
31
2.31
8.3
412.5
10.47
20.5
2.65
12.0
413.5
11.03
20. 1
3.73
36.6
576.8
16.20
13.7
32
5,«"
31.8
644,7
10,11
12.5
6,41
35.9
632.2
11.48
12.5
7,93
57.5
814.7
17,18
9.5
SUM
2.60
14.9
421.1
10,14
19.6
2.79
17.4
443.6
10,37
18,5
3.64
36.2
573.3
14.68
13.8
BAG
2.81
18.3
464,2
10.32
17.7
3.25
23.4
490,6
10.74
16.5
4.37
50.5
641 .1
12.62
12.1
33
0.59
9.2
64,8
0.16
109
0,65
7.1
65.9
0.17
112
0.95
10.3
63,3
0. 16
107
3«
6.16
96,5
765,2
1.22
9.5
6,78
7«.l
778.0
1.11
9.7
9.35
87.8
765.6
1.11
9.5
35
3,87
71,4
470.0
0.56
14.9
3.92
54.1
495.5
0,74
15.0
5,08
60.4
486.0
0.58
14.9
36
2.00
26.2
420.2
0.88
18.9
2,44
25.9
413,9
0.53
19.2
2,60
5.4
468. 7
0.76
18,3
37
1.72
2,5
303.4
2.76
28. a
1.70
3.2
302.5
2.67
28.4
2.33
2.6
353.4
6.78
24.3
3B
1.87
2.8
347.1
8.00
24.8
1.88
2.8
336.5
7.59
25.6
2.57
6.0
478.4
14.38
17.9
39
1 .9(1
3.6
397.2
10.78
21.7
1.96
3.6
393,6
10.83
21.9
2.18
3.6
592. 1
18.53
14.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN CRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IOLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MRES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A U1.8S CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
390
-------
APPENDIX C.CONT'n
LISTING OF LOADED VFHICLE test RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 138 1969 FURO MUST 351
.... IkiT= 3500. RLHPS12.J - — -
MODE FUEL
no. hc co co2 Nn* echn
DETRniT
IWTslOOO, HLHPmia.J
FUEL
HC CO CII2 NOX ECun
... IWTsabOO, »LHP=27.3
FUEL
HC CO C02 NOX ECON
1 6.00 113.5 117.9 3.9J 13.8
2 1.69 50.8 532.6 3.95 11.1
3 10.19 185.9 72U.U 3.92 8.5
« 3.56 55,3 112.2 3.71 17.«
5 2.37 16.3 113.1 6.32 19.9
6 2.68 10.5 392.1 1,95 21.3
7 3.A3 67.2 <136.5 6.28 16.0
#1 2.89 J6.6 "2b,1 5.62 18.0
9 5.05 19.3 U66.2 10.20 17.5
10 3.55 18,3 181.5 7.12 17.0
11 a.8? 98.9 126.1 7,19 |1.9
12 1.53 11.5 569,2 8,15 13.6
13 5,11 42.1 527. 1 13.32 H.6
11 J.21 16.6 118.5 7.35 IS.3
15 6.50 30.7 507.8 5.25 15.1
16 16.37 165,6 967.6 7,55 6.9
17 1,02 70.7 J96.0 7,60 17.0
IB 3,19 2 3,6 503.2 7.18 16,1
19 U.61 55.9 392.7 7.16 17.9
20 1,71 28.8 508.8 8.08 13.7
21 5,15 111,1 177,5 8.61 13,3
22 1.36 12.2 550.7 7.75 11.1
23 8.62 112.7 651.2 9.71 10.1
2a 3.05 21.5 113.0 9.88 18.2
25 2,76 17.1 110.5 7.08 18.6
?b 8.58 19,6 709.3 7.29 10.9
27 1.05 10,9 192.8 1 1 . <11 15.6
28
29
1.09 27.0 519.2 10.11 15.1
7.53 102,9 592.8 8.75 11.1
6,33 126,3 371.6 3.76 15.0
5.17 57.6 512,7 1.25 13,7
10.85 197.1 778,0 3,81 7,9
3,83 60,8 111.9 fl.OU 16.1
2.32 16.8 125.2 6.70 19.3
2.18 11.3 117.6 5.67 20.1
2.70 65.0 116.7 6.71 15.9
2,80 13,8 161,7 6.55 16.1
3.15 21.2 178,2 10.22 17.0
3,12 18.3 506.5 8.12 16.3
1.12 58.2 183,8 6.93 15,1
1.11 33,7 633.3 11,11 12.7
1.96 50.1 561.8 13.18 13.5
3.23 22.8 168.8 8.32 17.2
7.00 31.9 520.7 5.38 11.8
16,55 160,6 981.1 7.15 6.9
5.88 70.3 112.3 9.68 15.5
3.61 22.3 515,1 7,10 15.8
1.91 53,7 130,8 9.31 16.7
1.88 26.1 609.2 8.73 13.3
6,03 181,5 160,0 5.30 11.6
5.11 81.0 510.6 7.03 13.0
9.71 129.0 661.2 9.05 9.9
3.12 20.1 165,5 10.77 17.5
2.80 16.5 160,7 8.10 17.9
8.68 36.1 739.2 7.98 10.8
1.09 36.6 520.9 12.16 15.0
1,09 23,9 521,9 9,09 15.1
7.91 95.8 626,1 8.97 11.1
6.85 111.1 581.5 2.30 11.3
5.57 110.3 570.1 1.67 11.7
10,55 211.2 808,3 1.88 7.2
3,76 69.3 167,7 6.17 15.1
2.65 20,7 173.5 11,08 17,3
2.67 17,7 519,7 9.77 16,0
1.33 108,2 183,8 7.81 13.3
3,97 120.8 577.3 H.69 11,1
3.90 61.8 558,7 13,67 13.2
1.31 67.2 667.2 13.19 ii.j
5.69 157,1 500.8 8.91 11.6
5,78 99.1 790,6 11.93 9.2
6.58 151,9 613.2 10.72 9.B
1.50 79.1 578.3 10.67 12.1
11.22 67.8 616.6 7.70 11.7
17.76 236.2 1052.9 9.35 6.0
5.70 118.3 lil.i 7.97 H.O
1.11 58.3 591.7 10.66 12.7
5.22 80,3 131.5 8.76 15.1
5.66 60.7 737.8 13.00 10.1
7,76 139,5 735.6 8.20 9.1
7.12 136.8 720.3 10.83 9.3
11.71 165.0 796.6 13.70 8.1
1.11 50.2 516.8 13.83 13.9
1,01 51.1 599.7 11.61 1?./
9.93 71,3 885.5 11.61 8.6
5.67 120,3 572.6 12.11 11.1
5,62 78.9 682.9 12,09 10.6
8.82 122,2 711.1 12.09 9.5
30
2.99
20.6
150,3
10.82
18,0
3.10
20.9
182.3
12.82
16.9
1.39
69.5
525.1
0.58
13.7
31
2.95
18.8
161.0
7.63
17,6
2.85
17,6
177.2
".12
17.3
1.20
90.8
579.8
9.22
12.1
32
8.21
19.2
735.8
8.28
10,6
8.18
11,1
713.0
9.51
10,6
10,00
107,8
863,1
10,25
8.3
SUM
3.33
31,6
175.9
7.27
16.1
3.31
36,1
190,6
7.70
15.9
1,36
70,1
5B2.5
9,76
12.b
HAG
3.88
10.5
199.7
7.76
15.1
1.15
18.6
519,3
8.59
11.6
5.32
100.9
610.2
9,32
11.3
33
1 .16
25.1
58.0
0,08
86,7
1.22
27.9
72.3
0.21
71,0
1 .18
33.2
76.9
0.23
66. 3
3a
13.83
321 .7
718.1
0,71
7.0
13.18
312.1
829.9
1,80
6.3
13.99
362. 1
779.1
1 .06
6.1
35
5.60
111.6
171.8
0.32
12.1
6.26
156.5
121,1
0.?9
12.9
5.91
ISO. 1
183,5
0.18
12.0
36
3.13
7<».7
101.3
0,11
16.1
J.53
82.3
363,2
0,31
17.6
3.39
83. J
358.1
0 , 31
17.7
37
1 .33
2.7
100,3
1.27
21.7
1.11
J.5
100,1
1.82
21.7
1.17
2.9
131.0
2.08
20 .2
38
1.33
1.6
125.2
5.83
20.5
1 .36
1.1
133.7
5,82
20.0
1 .91
1,6
527.6
10,81
16,1
39
1 .80
10.8
175.1
8.31
17.8
1 .65
7.0
176,1
8.81
18.0
2.72
28.2
582.5
12,60
11,0
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY In miles PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
JV1
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULT3 ON
VEHICLE I42 1969 PLYM FURY 318
DETROIT
IWTeUOOO, RLHP
= 12.0
]
|WT»4500, RLHP>12,0
[HTnSOOO, RLHP
' = 27,4
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
8.32
71.4
341.5
3.86
18.5
1 1. 19
104,8
286.3
3.13
18.2
10.62
111,0
358.7
3.53
15.7
2
7.21
50.1
541 .6
4,49
13.8
8.68
79.9
614,4
5.46
11.6
8.33
83. 1
617.9
6.67
11.5
3
11.12
106.0
635.4
4.02
10.6
20.64
162,6
746.4
5,14
6.3
16.67
171.7
734.0
6.03
8.4
a
5.07
63.7
416.2
4,95
16.7
6.13
71,6
487.6
5.61
14.3
4,98
90.6
495.5
6.04
13.6
5
2.63
20.7
413.9
6.17
19.5
3.25
21.7
485.1
7.51
16.6
3.73
46,8
480. 1
7.30
15.7
6
2.85
14.8
413.1
5.79
19.9
2.93
17.3
435.4
6.27
18.8
3.58
44.2
508.6
7.52
15.1
7
3.5#
41.3
457.5
5.89
16.6
4.09
38.2
513.5
7.28
15.1
4.79
70.3
546.0
7.55
13.2
e
3.62
36.8
482.6
7,66
16.1
3.51
50,4
499,4
7.93
15.1
4.42
88,9
641 .8
9,80
11.2
9
4.08
26,4
452.8
8.35
IT.5
4.30
36.0
493,4
9.04
15.7
4,76
50.7
583.5
9.93
13.1
10
4.04
19.3
511.9
9.25
16.0
4,28
30.5
525,6
9.25
15.1
5.19
69.9
682.7
10.53
11.0
11
5.27
60,8
485.7
6.28
14.8
5,62
82.1
543,3
7.21
12.9
6.72
126.8
585.8
5.70
11.0
12
5.65
46,4
605 . 4
10,16
12.7
5.34
55.5
638.0
10.43
12.0
6.86
132.6
800.6
10.55
8.6
13
7,04
93,7
556.7
7.40
12.2
6,96
81.8
612.4
8.68
11.6
7,78
131.0
672.9
7.27
9.8
14
3.94
35.3
445.7
7.83
17.3
3.93
43.1
462.0
7.42
16,4
5.08
97.3
576.3
8.56
11.9
15
10.47
42.0
414,6
4,41
17.3
10,46
63,5
422.1
4.06
16.0
11.31
93.3
509.2
5.24
12.8
16
23.91
126.4
744,9
5.45
8.7
24,75
196.1
784,8
5.06
7.6
27.28
232.0
867.5
6.49
6.6
17
6.05
57.9
437.0
5.55
16.2
6.61
74.7
462.8
5.72
14.8
7.23
104.2
499.9
5.37
12.9
16
4.55
50,1
443.1
5.16
16.6
4,79
54.1
497.9
6.71
14.9
5.58
70,4
581.5
8.81
12.5
19
6,06
52,7
431,7
5,46
16.6
6,31
67,1
450.2
5.95
15.u
6.53
86,3
500.0
5.03
13.5
20
5.66
36.7
554,1
7.32
14.2
6,59
59.0
S92.U
7.98
12.6
7,04
95.0
663.8
9.33
10.4
21
6.19
79.7
505.8
6.01
13.6
6,83
117,4
530,7
5,66
12.0
7.30
143,3
559.6
5.76
11.0
22
5.65
65.1
531.4
7.31
13.6
5.92
80,5
555,2
8,62
12.7
7.28
1 39,6
726,0
9.55
9.2
23
14.29
94.3
612.4
8.11
11 .0
14.61
123.1
666,6
9,37
9.8
15.29
145.8
774,5
10.06
6. u
21
3.75
26. 1
468.8
8.13
17.0
3.89
36.6
495. 0
8,33
15.7
4,48
68.1
5«0. 1
6.76
13.4
25
3.18
15.7
474,1
8,71
17.4
3.35
31.7
487,6
8.94
16.2
4,49
80,8
590.0
9,09
12,1
26
12.61
44,6
618.9
7,08
12.2
13,71
65.0
640,9
7.14
10.9
13.93
119.2
764.a
B.?2
8.9
27
5.28
49.8
526. 7
9.13
1 a. 3
5.66
65.7
555,6
8.59
13.1
6.63
1 19.7
595. 7
6,1?
11.0
28
4.94
23.4
483.0
7,67
16.6
5.31
47.6
523.8
8.29
14,4
6.52
92.5
657.8
10.26
10.8
29
12.82
67,3
597.9
8.95
11.9
13.29
98.8
578.1
10.09
11.4
14.30
113.1
759.0
10.HU
9.0
30
3.77
28.6
510.5
8.41
15.6
3.94
39.3
481.3
8.39
16.0
a,90
89.0
590. 1
6.03
11.9
31
3.52
35.2
465.6
7.26
16.7
3.67
5«.7
509.0
7.15
14.6
4.99
102.8
525.9
8.78
12.6
32
11.41
61.8
610.6
6.66
11.9
12.01
103,4
635.6
5.92
10.6
13.16
130. 1
767.7
8.94
8.8
SUM
4.28
37.7
469.0
7.86
16.4
4.48
U7.8
192,4
8.06
15.3
5.10
70,4
581 .4
9.12
12.5
BAG
5.42
50.8
505,3
7.27
14.4
5.70
58,0
537.4
7.66
13.7
6,78
107.5
632.9
7.68
10.8
33
2.04
20.6
44,0
0.06
107
1.47
19.2
43,5
0.13
113
1.80
20,8
41.0
0.12
1 1 1
3«
10.56
271.5
668.7
0.00
7.9
5.68
270.0
798,3
1.38
7.2
10.22
283,1
748.6
1 .48
7.2
35
4.65
123.1
490.5
0.08
12.7
3.69
107.4
499,8
0.40
13.0
3.89
104.0
509.3
0.34
13.0
36
2.23
70.4
365.4
0,16
18.4
2.84
67.5
382.4
0.41
17.8
3.05
66.0
375.9
0.39
18. 1
37
2.15
24,6
337.9
2.02
23.2
2.11
26.7
344,9
2.25
22,6
2.26
24.9
383.9
3.88
20.6
38
1 .911
9.9
385.5
7.25
21.8
2.03
10.9
406,9
8.13
20,6
2.23
12.3
505.2
11 .90
16.7
39
2,06
13.1
471,5
13.19
17.B
2.33
20.9
486.2
12,50
16.9
2.56
18.1
625.5
15.14
13.4
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1,85 CARBflN TO HYDROGEN RATIO
3<*
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
USTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 117 1968 BU1C KFC 130
DF THOI T
IWT=1500, PLHP=|U.O ----
MdOf FLIP L
no. hc cn ro2 no* econ
IM = 5000, RLHP=|1.0
FUEL
HC CD C02 NO* f- CUN
IwI= 5500i HLHP=30,5
~ 'It L
HC CO C02 Nil* ECON
1 6.1? 69.6
2 7,11 130.6
3 1?.1J 203.7
19
20
21
2?
23
21
25
26
27
?0
29
30
31
32
5.91 IIH.9
I.77 67.5
3.5« 55.5
399.8 1.35 16.8 6.78 82.8 165.6 2.68 11.1 5.IS 103.0 377.1 2.96 15.9
165.9 3,0? 1?,6 6.99 121,0 610,6 1.71 10.A 7,09 1B0.7 670.7 3,63 9.1
801.3 3.56 7.6 11.91 176.2 862.1 3.90 7.5 11.17 250.3 880.1 1,15 6.0
110.0 1.28 13.7 5.05 83,1 192.1 3.36 13.9 5.38 119,0 518.1 5,HI 12,3
121.5 7.01 16.1 3.39 53.6 158,0 5.21 16.1 6.56 78.8 521.3 7.9U 1J.1
105.8 1.66 16.3 3.15 32.8 131.6 6.36 17.9" 6.33 67.6 518.1 7.71 14.2
7 5.01 122.6 117.7 3.85 11.2 3.32 186.8 515.9 1.00 10.1
8 1,12 118.6 501.6 5,22 12,7 1,50 101.8 110,9 5,19 11.3
9 1.h7 86.5 161.7 7.55 11.1 S.10 133,7 519.3 5.73 11.9
5.15 178.2 533.6 5.52 10.7
1.85 177,0 682.3 8.79 9,1
5.35 160,8 588.6 7.36 10.3
10 U.au 5B,6 556.0
11 5.25 111.3 560,6
12 5.81 111.2 699.0
13 5.66 130.6 599.0
11 1,09 70.7 519,1
15 *.08 97.9 179.0
7,78 13,1 5.33 65,2 185.9 7,11 11.7 5,86 151.8 738,0 10,55 0,9
5.21 11,0 6.21 233.6 579.1 3.69 9,2 6,39 259.6 628.1 3.13 N.1
8.58 9.9 6.17 107.9 610.1 9.08 11.1 7.55 357,9 H38.6 10.36 6.2
0.13 10.8 7.01 219.6 676,6 5.11 8.5 7.08 350.1 693.7 5.92 7.0
6,73 13,8 1.56 86.2 162,1 6,19 11.5 5.27 133,5 636.3 8.38 10.5
3.39 13.5 9.70 88.9 139.6 3,31 H.5 8. 31 128.2 577. 1 1. 39 11.0
16 1 7,01 207,9 955.5 1,10 6,6 1 7,01 183,2 889,5 3,88 7 . 2 1 7 , 70 251.H 1 080 . 1 5.69 5.0
17 1.91 76.3 251.6 9.20 22.7 5.11 99.1 196.8 7,21 13.3 5.60 215,6 515.3 3.85 9.0
18 1.15 55,7 537.3 6.66 13.<> 1.51 56. 3 573. 7 7. 11 13. 1 0. 33 1 31 .0 6 18, 3 7 .65 10.8
5.01 71.9
5.78 71,7
5.70 202,1
6.01 117.2
9.81 135.5
3.87 81.3
3.75 56,8
11.61 153,6
5.01 129.1
5,73 71,6
9.08 101,0
1.S7 112.8
1.11 107.1
12.01 186,9
116.6
631.1
532.3
586.8
713.6
513.1
190.2
619.8
555.3
559.0
683.6
555.8
510.1
676. 7
8.17 15,1
6.85 11.6
3.35 10.2
6.07 11.2
8.66 9.0
7.83 13.6
8,06 15.0
5.80 9.6
8.73 11.5
8.27 12.9
8,17 10.1
1.95 11.2
6,05 12.B
5.01 8.8
1.98 67,1
5.75 50,1
5.61 187,2
6,13 152.6
10.25 122.9
3.91 69.7
3,96 66.6
11.77 93.6
5.29 108.7
5.83 13,8
9.03 27.1
1.70 111.7
1.27
11.21
"1.5
<>5.5
192. 7
695.1
563,1
635,7
815,6
535.1
502.6
670,0
570,5
571.7
703.9
192.5
509. 3
661,0
9.95 11.1
9.16 11.2
5.09 10.1
6.51 9.9
9.15 8.5
7.92 13.5
6.99 11.3
5.36 10.1
7.88 11.7
8.18 13,5
9.89 10,9
1.30 12,9
5.88 13,3
1.55 10.1
5.63 126.0
6.58 129.2
1.13 211.0
6.91 206.8
10.06 176.7
1.68 195.1
1.65 H2.9
11,31 208.2
6,50 292.3
6.59 161,6
8.98 137.6
3.71 202.8
1,97 171.1
11.27 229.3
511.5 6.26 12.2
751.1 10.36 9.1
639.5 5.16 «.5
701.5 9.8? 7,6
953.0 13.01 7.0
572.9 6.91 9.9
611.2 0,96 10,1
816.9 7.18 7.5
5B6.8 3.58 8.3
717.5 9.75 8.9
002. 1 1 1 .99 7.9
553.3 4.57 10,0
628. 7
807.B
B.hO
7.00
">.7
7.1
3UH
BAG
1.28 77,0
5.II I 19.8
5H.3
550.1
7.12 13.7
6.19 11.8
1.17 81.6 516,9
5,31 136,3 567.8
6.88 13.5
6.91 11.1
1.98 139.0 67B.5 10.50 9.7
5.80 198.0 610,1 7,17 9.1
33
0 .66
U.O
78.7
0.01
90,5
n. 99
11.3
51.1
0. t6
no
0,71
11.0
7 2.9
0.05
9U . 6
31
9.39
159.7
881 .2
0.00
7.6
9.90
85.5
899.5
0.58
8.3
9.05
171.7
1013,7
1.10
6.7
35
11.03
317.5
509.8
0.00
8.1
8.20
183.1
586.2
0.32
9.9
13,01
303.0
516.1
0.26
8.6
36
5.15
108,1
180.6
0.53
13.3
5,88
110.9
101.6
0.21
13.8
7.71
177,3
395.6
0,26
li.7
37
3.22
61 .2
315.2
0.87
19.7
3.03
51.0
339.0
0.83
20.5
3.52
37.3
099. 0
1.38
15.b
38
2.33
21.7
112.9
5.60
19.5
2.15
l'.l
135.6
6.36
IB.7
2.55
21.0
693,6
15,22
12.1
39
2.03
1«.2
528.7
12.59
15.9
2,03
16,6
505. 1
12,09
16,5
3,06
58,0
828,1
22,13
9,6
EMISSION RESULTS In GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FUR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY in miles PEW GALLON (MNUTfS PER GALLUN FOR IDLE)
Flip L FCONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 1:1.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE ISO 1968 CHFV IMPA J07
DETROIT
[WT=4000. RLHPo12.0
....
[WT=4500, RLHPc12,0
....
I NT = 5000, RLMP = 27.4
....
MODF
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
econ
HC
CO
CU2
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
5.35
96.4
410.8
3.49
15.2
7.77
209.8
517,2
2.60
10.2
7.77
148.0
415.4
1.77
11.2
2
6.05
105.7
572.4
4,68
11.7
6.57
95.6
584.2
4.56
11.8
6.57
123.8
619.2
5.10
10.6
3
11.80
171 .6
766.4
6.20
6.3
12.41
173.9
841.2
5.86
7.7
11.49
199.6
653.6
5.53
7.4
0
«.22
47.0
451.2
6,47
16.5
4,62
96.0
579.7
4,60
11.9
4.50
86,7
545.4
4,34
12,8
5
2.66
21.2
462.3
7.52
17,6
3,20
77.4
501.3
5.37
14.0
4,02
83,3
522.7
6.17
13.1
6
2.36
20.0
427.1
5.50
19.0
3,10
41.3
409.2
4.00
18.3
3.69
90,7
528.1
6,55
11.0
7
5.29
104,7
506.4
6,60
12.9
15,17
286.0
554.0
5,44
8.4
9.85
190,0
552.7
5.86
10.1
R
8.15
155,2
524.2
6,11
11.2
10,61
167.4
528.6
5,00
10.6
22,75
402,9
781.7
6,20
6.0
9
5.«2
90,4
489,4
5,93
13.7
7,20
157.1
493.8
5.32
1 1.6
20,91
251,7
656.8
6,90
7.9
10
5.58
77.9
519.8
6.17
13.4
6,38
91.0
522,0
5.31
13,0
30.30
392,1
904.9
6,12
5.5
I 1
6. <12
194,7
527.8
J.74
10,4
11,03
275.4
597.4
5,67
8.3
15.17
317.7
637.0
4,50
7.5
12
6.69
119.4
631.0
6.87
10.6
13.92
186.3
708,9
7.10
6.5
14.91
458, 1
875.5
6,25
5.4
13
7.52
217.4
605.7
5,56
9.1
14,13
289.6
675,2
5.93
7.6
12,76
342,1
730.6
6,15
6.8
la
7.83
129.2
464.6
4.89
12.5
10,16
131.3
501,3
5.13
12.0
9.03
323,9
636.5
4.72
7.6
IS
9.73
64,7
465.1
4,32
14.4
12,46
94,7
501.6
3.72
12.9
1 1.38
165.5
623.3
4.60
9.5
16
20.68
180,0
1016.4
6.30
6.5
24.65
183,0
1005.6
5.40
6.5
24.50
346,2
1216.9
6.69
4.8
17
5.71
112.5
509.2
4,63
12.6
7.11
201,0
505.7
2.96
10.5
11.10
250.2
561.2
1.17
9.0
18
0.22
60.8
502.4
2.94
14.5
5,10
88.1
490.9
3.67
11.7
6.72
193.4
667.2
6.30
6.9
19
5.07
112.2
492.0
3.54
13.0
6.61
187.0
492,8
3.24
11.0
8.99
160.5
520.0
1.71
11.1
20
5.90
111.0
573.0
4.17
11.6
6.58
115.3
601.6
4.42
1 1.0
7.95
164,2
759,0
7,66
6.1
21
7.80
233,6
542.5
4,56
9.5
10.65
304.6
551.9
4.27
8.1
9,46
266.5
571.7
4.51
6.7
22
12.18
195.8
614,2
5.77
9.2
14.39
201.«
630.8
5.50
6.9
10.43
179.1
745.5
5.88
6.5
23
13.98
198.0
727.1
7.25
6.2
15.21
210.4
716. 1
7.19
6.1
13.48
289.3
658.8
7.10
6.5
2a
4.81
91.5
477.4
5.55
13.9
5.09
161.2
476.4
5.17
1 1.9
9.SO
214.2
571.5
5.04
9.(1
25
4.54
87,0
459.0
5.36
14.5
4,98
82,2
469.6
4.92
14.4
5.28
273.0
645.4
4.87
8.1
26
11.18
99,8
702.9
6,77
9.9
11.75
102.4
700.7
5.82
9.9
14.21
254.4
901,1
8.06
6.6
27
6.96
187.0
556.6
5.46
10.2
12.10
305.8
571.5
5,14
8.1
14.24
106.6
662.9
6.20
7.5
26
6.46
90,0
547.0
6.06
12.5
11.17
126.8
565.2
5.97
11.1
10.51
296.6
726.7
6.01
7.2
29
9.70
124.1
660.9
8.53
10.0
13.13
196.0
669. 1
6.36
8.7
12.14
206.2
811.1
N.Ofl
7.6
50
4.56
122.2
469,7
4,56
12.7
7.86
256.2
521 .0
«.25
9.4
12,27
231 .7
576.1
5.35
9.1
11
4.56
106,6
479,6
4,98
13.3
10,10
146.3
553.4
5.54
10,9
9.26
118.9
641,4
5,52
7,6
32
10,13
122,1
714.4
6.11
9.5
16.75
165.7
756.3
6.23
8.3
15.05
281.4
876.7
8.12
6.5
SUM
5.15
65.3
504.5
5.68
13.6
6,86
119.6
523.9
5.47
12.1
6.75
19 J , 6
661.7
6,66
6,9
BAG
7.29
141,5
544.9
5.66
11.2
10.07
193.3
583, 7
S, 49
9.7
12.41
294,9
696.6
5.78
7.4
33
2.01
16.8
49.5
0,05
103
1.29
22.9
66.2
0.04
83.5
1.27
22.2
61.2
0.04
87.0
34
17.82
222,5
703,6
0,94
8.0
13.49
226,6
654.4
0.47
8.4
12,93
211,6
660.7
0,42
6.6
35
6.16
85.4
516.2
0.42
13.2
5,28
86,1
490,6
0.52
13.8
5.20
71.4
S69.9
0.63
12.7
36
2."2
22,9
524,4
1.14
15.6
3,20
32.3
481.7
1.19
16.4
3.00
16,6
571 .6
1 ,82
14,5
37
1.77
5.7
367,2
2.86
23.2
1,84
7.7
381.4
3.01
22.2
2.06
7.5
462.0
5.69
18.5
36
1.76
9,4
421 .8
5.27
20. 1
1,64
11.9
430.9
5.34
19.5
2.26
19.1
579.1
10.55
14.4
39
2,96
24.5
482.6
8.51
16.7
2.73
22.3
486. J
6.24
16.7
3.95
120,2
712.1
9.16
9.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLHN (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A U1.A5 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
¦iwt
-------
APPEND!* G.CONT'D
LISTING Of- LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 151 1968 CHEV JMPA 327
DETROIT
I«T=10O0, RLHP=12.0 ---- IWTauSOO, KLHP= 12.0 IWTsSOOO, RLHP=27.U ----
MflDE FUEL FUEL FUEL
NO. HC CD C02 NO* F CI IN HC C(1 C(12 NOX ECC1N HC CO CU2 NO* ECON
1
2
5
un.25
59.03
92.21
152.6
138.9
191.3
311.1
131.2
710,5
1.12
1 .21
1 .90
12.5
10.6
6,8
50. 72
59.69
101,90
117.3
150.7
193.b
366.7
509.3
762,0
1.46
1 .SI
2.13
12.5
9.5
6.1
19.78
71.10
135,03
216.0
213.8
231 .8
358.7
510.8
763.9
1.00
1 .36
2.72
9.8
8.2
5.7
a
5
6
11,25
39.80
H.31
96,6
H2.0
118.1
103.8
383.9
350.1
2.51
2,31
1,11
12.8
12.1
13.2
51,10
16.92
16,30
119.1
lie.a
133.0
127.5
397,7
365.6
2.37
2.22
1.38
11.3
11.1
12.3
77.81
58.70
71 .12
157.5
207.7
178,1
116.5
127.9
113.5
2.67
2.02
1 .19
9.1
9.1
9.°
7
8
9
60.H
53,51
52.13
361.5
199.5
1 76.2
391.9
390.1
112.1
1 .91
1,73
2.83
7.7
10,2
10.1
61,01
51", 31
53.22
293.6 ,
197,2
180.2
119,7
119,6
128,2
1.88
2.13
2,86
8.3
9.6
10.1
59.31
52,78
51 .72
278.0
130.1
397.1
378.9
106. 1
119.3
1 .89
0,77
1.72
8.8
7.1
7.2
10
1 1
12
68. 1 B
63.au
81 .all
135.3
271 .8
187.1
160,8
131.8
503.6
2,<48
1 .86
2.36
10,0
8.1
8.1
69,20
61. 39
82,67
119.2
317.1
215.3
152.7
112,7
515.1
2.10
1 .95
2.39
9.6
7.7
8.0
67 .21
62.57
80.33
351 .0
198.2
118.7
5 39.5
173.6
616.5
2.13
1 .58
1.61
6.8
6.1
5.5
13
I a
15
73.91
58.78
83.89
3 1 * , 2
167.0
168.fi
162.3
366.2
109.8
2.17
t.57
1.13
7.1
10.9
9.1
75,02
59.66
85.15
311.2
185,1
156,9
515,8
390.1
128,1
2.26
1.38
1.26
7.1
10.2
9.1
72.89
57 .98
117,31
505,8
335,3
278.1
881.5
817.1
797.8
1.97
5.61
3.11
1.6
5.7
5.5
16
17
18
187.82
59.25
6 1 , 0*1
320.0
119,5
176.2
816.?
386,9
103.9
1 .69
2.00
1.19
1.6
1 1.0
10.2
200,82
62.37
63,16
297.3
165.8
193,2
871.5
112,7
106,5
1,80
2,02
1.08
«.5
10.2
".7
299,60
91,39
86,75
522.8
331.6
281.7
1129.9
521.2
521.9
1.15
1.53
1 .96
2.8
6,6
7.1
19
20
21
61 .82
77,01
72.08
191.7
207,7
311 .1
370.3
175.0
U20.1
1.39
1.27
1.32
10.2
6,5
7.5
65,50
05,36
73, 16
201.3
227.1
393,0
106,6
195,5
123.8
1.51
1,28
1.52
9.5
7.9
7.0
88.90
109.96
71 .09
267.9
265.0
108.7
502.1
611.1
550.6
1.76
2.17
6.91
7.1
6.3
6.3
22
2 3
21
81.31
103,61
61 .01
211.9
212,0
189, 1
<168.1
606.0
378."
1.55
3,03
1 ,99
8.0
7.0
10.2
82.56
113,32
61.96
216.1
219,7
221 .9
503.2
627.5
393.6
1.59
3,71
1.96
7.7
6.7
9.5
80.23
139.38
60.20
301.6
366.0
310.2
1120.H
1071 .1
167.9
7.80
5.H
I .86
1.6
".3
7.7
25
26
27
58. SI
11U.65
72.53
1 39,2
201.7
302 .3
106.9
619.1
101.1
1.71
1 .90
1.51
10.9
6.8
B.O
59. 19
121.16
73.62
169,1
218.8
278.1
39U.0
631 .7
157.3
1.17
1 .71
1,80
10.5
6.5
7.9
57 ,51
169.98
71 .53
391.1
108. 1
126.1
161,3
711 .6
518.6
I .05
1 .81
1 .86
7.0
1.6
6.1
28
29
30
81.33
91 ,96
61 .83
I8i.9
179.5
210.5
132.5
581.9
3 76.1
1.55
2.85
1 .66
9.1
7.6
9.3
82.55
102.13
62.76
181.5
191,8
216.1
119.7
592.9
379.5
1 .79
3.10
1 .59
8.9
7.3
9.2
80.21
115.67
60.98
320.1
289.5
352.7
57 7 .2
738.0
1h3.l
2. 09
1.00
1.78
6,6
5.1
7.3
31
32
59.09
11 ft.00
170.1
217.0
387.9
596.6
l.«7
1.60
10.5
6.5
59.98
128.30
218.1
276.7
378,2
591,6
1.13
1.15
9.7
6.2
58.28
165,73
367.6
112.6
180.9
726.8
1 . 09
1.61
7.1
1.6
SUM 58.08 160.9
RAG 65.99 199.2
119.7
137.3
2.13 10,1
1.78 9,2
59,68 167,0
66.81 203,0
131.2
529.2
2.20
1.70
10,0
8.1
63.85 253.2
81.20 369.1
576.0
599. 1
i. 08
2.01
7.5
6.2
33
5.01
1.1
51.5
0.07
128
7.21
10,3
61.2
0.10
68.6
5.65
1.1
19. U
0.05
120
31
113.13
188,8
902.7
1.17
5,7
71,61
61.3
72b.3
0,81
8,1
66,16
252.2
1001,2
1,09
5.5
35
31.91
128.9
516.5
0.17
10,1
11. 39
1 35,8
5H.3
0.50
10.2
36 . 75
16?.0
550 . 1
0.52
9.3
16
17.70
112.0
361.3
0.13
12.6
18.11
125.1
362,0
0.12
12.5
19,00
166. 1
120,8
0.19
10,6
37
11.18
107.1
328.3
0.73
H.l
39.77
99.0
316.1
0,65
11.8
13.35
111.8
37e.l
l.H
12.9
38
10.85
82.5
391.1
1.72
13.6
15.36
81.5
121.6
2.11
12.8
51 .96
91.5
519.9
1.05
10.7
39
13.81
66.7
127.6
3.97
13.2
12,88
61.9
131,3
3,98
IS.3
15.52
<>7.1
635.6
7.29
9.5
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PFR GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
H'EL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111,85 CARBON TU HYDROGEN RATIO
-------
APPENDIX G.CUNT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 154 1968 OODG POL* 383
DETROIT
....
IWTO4000, RLHPB13.2
IWTO4500, RLMP
fM
ii
....
....
I"T=5000, RLHP
= 29.0
....
MODE
FUEL
FUf L
FUEL
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
COZ
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
5.52
119.8
372.1
3.72
15.4
5.25
123.0
367.5
4.33
15.4
5.58
129.4
397.6
a.76
14.3
2
5.82
88.2
631.1
7.75
11.3
5.94
99.8
618,7
8.43
11.2
5.94
102.4
726.9
10,90
9.8
3
10. 16
207,9
858.3
15.53
7.3
10.19
221,7
812.2
7.50
7.4
10.66
236,0
998,9
1 1 .52
6.3
4
4.35
82,4
490. 9
15.00
13.9
4.17
90,0
449.7
7.21
14.7
4.55
95,0
611.4
1 1 .56
11.4
5
3.08
36,2
473.4
9.13
16.4
3,06
42.7
446.4
10.53
17,0
3,25
46,8
578,9
14.28
13.4
b
J. 37
34.7
441 .0
12. 84
17.5
3.17
18.9
U90.7
10.56
15.8
3.55
U3.«
602,4
13.28
13.0
7
3.62
31.9
514.7
13.33
15.3
3. 74
60.9
460.9
9.38
15.6
4.02
102.0
634.9
12.23
11.0
8
3.29
32.7
509.0
11,37
15.5
3.51
49.9
454.7
10.69
16.3
4.28
81.8
687,6
15.26
10.7
9
3.65
35.0
509.8
9,69
15.4
3.8B
44.5
475. 1
1 1.28
15.9
4,34
77.5
665,0
15,00
U.l
10
4.36
43.3
550.6
12.09
14.0
4.41
47.2
570,6
12.81
13.5
5.18
73,7
761.B
1 7.62
9.9
11
3.96
48.3
533.3
12.68
14.3
3.91
50.8
532.6
12.27
14.2
3.95
113,7
683.3
12. 15
10.1
12
5,03
47.9
682,5
16,28
11.5
5.02
52.5
727,5
16,79
10.7
5,98
82,4
921,1
20,76
8,3
13
4.73
55.1
626.9
14,74
12.2
4.71
59.2
679,3
16.97
11.3
5.68
125.3
782,2
13.96
8.9
14
3.69
36.0
513.6
11.51
15.3
3.75
41,0
522,0
11.80
14.8
4.30
64.2
683.9
15.19
U.l
15
4,90
64,4
551,0
8.70
13.3
7.14
75.5
541.B
8.74
13.0
7.21
87.?
675.3
11.18
10,6
16
15.78
213.7
1018.7
1 1.50
b. 3
15.93
2«>.6
1014,9
1 1.38
t>. 1
17,48
277.9
1234.8
15.05
5,1
17
4.63
69.9
493.3
10.68
14.4
4,58
77.7
547. B
11.75
13.0
5.06
91.3
639,3
1 1.48
11.1
18
4.31
49.0
556.6
10.79
15,7
4.29
54,0
566.2
1 1 .69
13.4
4.81
79.7
652.2
1 1.93
11.2
19
4.67
67.9
493.8
10.59
14,4
4.57
76.0
516,0
10.73
13,7
4,85
88.3
595.5
9.73
11.8
20
5.74
63,0
671 .0
12,77
11,3
5,75
72,5
669.8
13,36
11,1
6,38
101.6
791.0
14,61
9.1
21
4.84
98.4
535.3
9.48
12.6
5.48
136.5
606.9
9.71
10,6
5,95
191 .4
649,(1
6.78
9.2
22
5.41
73.0
648.7
11.54
11.4
5.49
88.8
643.8
12,01
11.1
6.23
142.5
800.6
15.51
8.5
23
9.19
132.3
785.0
13.41
8.7
8.96
109,3
819.0
14.64
8.2
9, 64
190.2
939.3
15.65
7.0
24
3.52
36.9
514.6
12.22
15.2
3.43
42.9
532,7
1 3,58
14.5
3.59
61 . 1
594.4
12.47
12.6
25
3.55
35.2
476.8
10.45
16.3
3.46
38.8
505,9
I 1,65
15.4
3,90
62. 1
672.1
16.11
11.3
26
9.73
90.6
926.1
10.76
8.1
9.64
110.3
742.9
1 1,37
9.4
9.75
130.R
922.3
15.72
7.7
27
4.19
49.5
574.8
13.53
13.3
4.13
5B.1
592. J
15,35
12.7
4.29
80,4
693,0
14.16
10,7
28
4.90
50.4
565.9
12,14
13.4
4.98
55.8
589,0
12.91
12.8
5,14
71,5
724.4
17.43
10,4
29
7.91
111,0
741 .2
13.32
9.4
7.78
122.9
774.6
15,05
8.9
8,12
141.7
868.1
16.49
7.9
30
3.41
34.0
537.0
13.25
14,8
3,3b
46,3
568.2
13,86
13.6
3.75
65.9
619.9
11.62
12.1
31
3.50
35.2
513.3
11,90
15.3
1.42
44,6
517,2
1 1.54
14.8
4.21
88,7
644.3
13.14
11.1
32
8.91
88.4
770.9
13.04
9.5
3.68
110.2
757.9
11.88
9.4
10.24
159,3
875.9
12.66
7,7
SUM 4.02 51.a 530.2 10.73 14.2
BAG 4.57 55.8 563.0 10,80 13.3
3.96 57.2 535.7 10.94 13.9
4.52 63.8 587,1 10.65 12.6
a.27 77.1 664,2 13.61 11.1
«,99 100.2 727.9 12,69 9,8
33
1.18
28.9
72.1
0.13
73.2
1.05
28.4
71,6
0.12
74.2
1.05
32.2
76.3
0.21
68.1
34
13.49
332,8
858.3
0,96
6,2
12,75
344,1
871,3
1,01
b.l
12.46
383.9
839.9
1.28
6,0
35
7.17
176,3
556.6
0,64
10.0
6.77
182.0
515.1
0.75
10.8
6.74
210,6
560.1
0.48
9.7
36
4.52
121.3
423.2
0,37
14.1
4.38
122.3
410.3
0.46
14,4
4.21
138.5
430.0
0.36
13.4
37
3.07
28.5
385.3
4.12
20.2
2.91
27.6
368,3
4.10
21.1
2.75
35,8
429.7
6.43
17.9
38
2.90
38.2
427.5
7.37
17.9
2.93
40.1
441 .4
7.60
17.3
3.04
51.3
586.9
12.46
13.1
39
2.63
28.7
515.8
12,70
IS.6
2.51
28.9
513,7
12.59
15.6
2.59
25.4
679.0
18.42
12.2
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER HILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IOLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TU HYDROGEN RATIO
.590
-------
a PPfc NDI X G,CONT'D
LISTING (IF LtHDEn VFMICLt TI-ST RESULTS ON
Vfc h ILLE 158 1968 FUWD TORI 390
Of TRfll T
....
IwT=J500
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
I
5.11
67.5
2
5.30
77.3
3
9.71
115.2
1
1,01
5?. 3
5
2,86
30 .9
h
2.76
31.3
7
2.99
21.5
8
2.BI
?6. 1
9
3. ts
23.0
1 0
3.58
31.3
1 1
3.65
37,9
12
11 ,b
1 3
U, 46
13,5
1 1
<.15
31,6
1 5
5.69
31 .6
1 6
12,83
133,9
1 7
1, ?'l
57.7
18
3.76
35.5
19
1,09
11,1
?0
1,59
61 . 1
21
3.71
59. 1
22
".27
11,1
23
7,96
80,6
21
3.13
32. 5
25
3.22
36,6
26
8,11
83.2
? 7
4.80
15.6
28
1.22
15,0
29
7.06
86.7
30
4.05
32.6
41
4.H
36.2
32
8.25
87.0
SUM
3.53
38.0
HAG
3.77
10.8
CH2
FUE L
NO* ECDN
IwT=«000, WLHP=12,3
FUEL
hc cn cm NO* ICON
I*T=1500, RLHP=27.3
FUH.
HC CI) CIV NO* ECPN
182.3 1.09 11.7
51b.? 3.60 13.0
785.8 3,20 8.9
397.? 3.25 18.0
006.5 1.83 19.1
101.1 3.89 |9.3
169.7 8.11 17.1
179.7 6.IS 16.8
171.1 8.03 17.?
517.1 6.23 15.2
519.2 9.U 15.0
63H.2 H,27 12.3
581.0 9.65 13.1
179.6 5.71 16.3
193.9 3.75 15.8
892.1 1.36 7.A
162.7 5,62 IS.7
173,0 1.56 16.1
152.0 5.23 16.6
569.2 5,12 13.1
597.1 10.H? 13.2
599.1
656.8
133.1
168,5
678,5
522. 1
513.?
595.5
173.8
195.1
708, 7
501 .5
515.1
7.17 13.0
6.33 11.0
7.68 18.0
6.09 16.6
5,38 10.6
8,63 H.7
5.96 H.9
5.21 11,8
7.02 lb.6
6.51 15.8
6.31 10.2
6,26 15.5
6.82 15.0
1,80
5.15
9.30
71.2
62.1
H3.7
530, 3
606,9
897,0
3.71 I
1.79 :
1.12
3.99
2.90
2.73
58. 1
26.9
19.9
175.5
180.2
112.6
1.37 I
6.05 1
1.91 ]
3.20
2.96
J.32
31.7
Ji.7
26.6
511.6
181.5
535.6
7.26 1
6.11 1
8,31 1
3.02
3.11
1.56
32.5
37.2
39.2
535.3
552.0
631.1
8.13 1
10,10 1
8.86 1
1.71
3.32
5.91
16,7
31.2
52.0
705.1
195.2
186*1
12,27 1
6.16 1
1.27 I
13.36
1.51
3.81
163.1
72.2
10.6
908.9
511,5
519.5
5.13
6.77 1
5.71 1
1,11
1.71
2.58
57.0
13.7
75.3
171.3
596,8
689,5
6,60 1
6.75 1
9.62 1
1.81
9.20
3.11
51 .9
115,9
15.2
611.6
708. 1
192,9
6.66 1
8.30
8.37 1
3.21
8.53
3.97
32.2
69. J
17,0
500.0
708,5
590.5
6.55 1
6,31 1
9,91 1
1.10
7.39
3.19
13.2
103,0
36,0
559. 3
811.0
511.6
6.31 I
6.09
8.29 1
3.33
8.69
35,6
68.1
538,0
756,6
6.91 1
7.01 1
2. J
7.7
7.3
3.8
11.9
9.7
13.0
8.9
1.91 89,5
5.05 61.0
9.58 136,1
1.09 61.1
3.13 31.1
2.03 35.2
1.31 56.8
1,03 87.5
1,19 50.1
1.3" 28,8
1.15 36.6
1.86 36,1
1,88 50,8
3.58 25.1
6.08 50.8
13.85 182.8
1.27 67.3
1.03 51.6
1.16 61.1
5.16 73.9
5.32 110.3
1.90 81,9
7.53 130,2
3,11 16.3
3.53 35.1
8.17 75.*
3.93 17.0
1.18 36,3
7.27 108.5
3.31 19.5
3,98
9.36
65. 7
92.7
521.9 u.u2 13.0
610.0 5.98 12.2
886.7 5.63 7.8
181.1 1.11 11.9
512.2 7.66 15.1
163.9 6.21 16.9
575.6 6.77 13.1
607.5 9.17 11.7
637.6 11.15 12.2
712.7 iu.79 11.5
635,1 10.50 12.6
859.9 11.HI 9.5
761.0 1U.J9 | II . 1
615.1 11.81 12.7
613.2 7.62 12.5
99U.9 8./I h.l
561.5 9.15 12.7
580.1 8.OP 13.2
556.1 8.10 13.3
672.2 8.9h II.0
619.u 7.78 10.o
761.9 11.Ml 0.7
788 . 8 9, 1 9 H, 7
536.0 9,35 11.3
613.1 10.62 12.5
861.3 9,99 fl,H
686.8 13,21 11.5
726.5 I I.16 11,1
7 11.2 8.05 9,b
191.9 «.72 15.3
658.2 9.67 11.5
881.5 I 0,?8 8.1
3.59
1.15
«2.2
13,9
522.7
567.2
6.61 14,8
7.82 13.7
3.89 11.5 620.5 10.48 12.7
0,58 61.3 673.7 9.89 11.2
33
1 . 1"»
21,6
62.7
0,11
73,8
1.10
19.7
83.2
0.01
75.5
0 ,9u
16.2
78.1
0.05
83.1
31
13.57
178.1
1331.6
1.76
5.1
13.22
250.1
1016,7
I .25
6.1
11,51
181.1
1009.8
1.62
6.7
35
6.10
8t>.5
562.6
0.55
12,1
6,59
108,8
536.7
0,60
12.2
5.60
88.2
5H.3
0.68
13.2
46
3.99
66,7
375. 1
0,37
18,0
3.90
62.1
359.9
0,38
16.9
3.71
53. 1
391 .5
0,71
18.2
37
1.90
11,8
372.1
I .62
22. 1
1 .90
13.6
3 7 0 ,8
2,50
22.3
2.13
6,0
125.0
1, 39
20, 1
38
?. 0 3
12."»
121 .9
1,66
19.8
2.21
18.1
113,8
1,66
19.8
3.21
28. 7
520.3
8.65
15.1
49
2.85
? 7 , 9
509.8
7.83
15.8
2,96
48.1
176. 7
6.99
16.2
2.85
10,9
635.7
15,00
13.1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
HJfcL ECONOMY IN miles per HALL ON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A ltl.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
jy I
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF IMADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 159 me MERC COUG 302
DETROIT
....
I*T=3500, RLHPo12.3
....
....
IWTbIOOO, RLHPo12,3
mmmm
....
I*Tsi500, RLHP
' = 27.3
....
mode
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
MC
CO
CU2
NOX
ECON
MC
CO
C02
NUX
tCflN
1
3.57
56.9
167,3
6.05
15.6
3.57
17,7
530.5
7.81
11.1
1.15
61.5
538,3
10.00
13.6
2
3.66
33,8
523.2
6.19
15.1
3,80
30.5
557.u
6.31
14.1
1.31
31,6
635.8
9.91
12.6
3
5,80
98,1
616.3
6,01
9.0
6,28
96.8
859.0
7.60
8.6
7.11
130,3
910.9
11.11
7.8
1
2.65
30.9
110.5
6.27
17,8
2.87
33.2
166.0
7.01
16.8
3,1 0
29.7
506.0
9.82
15.8
5
2.17
10,6
120.2
9.29
20,0
2.26
10,6
125,1
9.29
19,8
2.13
9.2
192,1
12.53
17.2
6
2.03
U.2
392.5
6.51
21.3
2.16
7.0
111.0
7.02
20.7
2.51
7.0
520.9
11.61
16,1
7
2.19
H.7
155.7
10,81
18.3
2.31
11.7
173,6
11.33
17.8
3.19
38.5
580, 1
12.31
13.6
8
2.03
9.6
159.1
9,23
18.5
2.22
8.8
167.3
9.91
18.2
3.23
38.7
611.7
1 3.88
12.1
9 .
2.33
10.7
156.6
10.17
18.5
2.13
8.1
172.7
10.21
18.0
3.15
20.1
623. 1
16.81
13.1
10
2.16
12.9
198.1
9,21
16.9
2.61
8.3
511.5
9.76
16.?
3.51
11
2.27
18.3
199.6
10.99
16.6
2.56
21.1
529.9
11.85
15.5
3.73
12
3,02
17.1
621 . 1
12,11
13.5
3.27
12.6
657 .7
12.53
12.9
1.75
13
2.83
25.0
565.5
13.32
H.5
3.28
26,8
602,1
11.79
13,6
1,20
11
2.09
11.1
177.6
9.52
17.7
2.10
8.6
180,6
10.11
17.7
3.56
15
3.23
26.6
639,2
6,55
12,8
3,78
23.1
518.6
6.91
15.7
5,63
16
7,29
111,3
1012.3
8.18
7.3
8.90
112.5
1019,1
9.61
7.2
12.32
17
2.75
39.0
196.7
10.26
15.7
2.91
37.6
198.9
10.19
15.6
1.13
1 8
2.17
19.3
181,9
8,33
17.0
2.51
13.7
195. 1
8.16
16.9
3.61
19
2.15
31.1
159.6
8,61
17.2
2.58
22.9
191,8
9.86
16.5
3.30
20
3.09
27.7
550.8
9.58
H.7
3.11
15.7
573.6
9.71
11.6
1.10
21
2.52
31.6
531.9
12.97
15.1
3.51
69.8
561,0
10.13
13.0
1,10
22
2.71
21.8
582,2
1 1.29
U.2
3.31
31.5
596.2
10.81
13.5
1.90
23
1.52
66,6
706.6
12.66
10.8
5.H
62.7
711.8
13,32
10.3
6,90
21
2.05
13.1
135.1
10.87
19.2
1 .51
9.5
157,9
in.u9
18.6
2.92
25
2.02
10.2
172,1
10.10
17.9
2.H
5.6
172.1
9.91
18.2
3,02
26
5.05
16.3
721,9
9.93
10.9
5.53
31.8
717,6
9.93
10.9
6.93
27
2.3 7
23.1
506.8
11.88
1 6. 1
2.61
18.1
517.7
13.57
15.2
3 ,6U
28
2.51
19,8
525.0
9.79
15.7
2,70
11.8
516,5
9.82
15.5
3.71
29
1.02
28,7
613.7
11.30
12.6
1.39
58.7
650.5
11.70
11.7
5,71
30
2.22
23.0
133.5
9,99
18.6
2.07
9.9
162,3
11 .16
18.3
3,01
31
2.17
15.3
053.6
9.35
18.3
2.12
6.9
513.0
10.28
16.7
3.10
32
5. 39
59.3
692.2
8,88
11.1
5.27
32.7
762.3
10.05
10.7
7.31
15.9 733.1 17.75 11.5
25.5 628.S 13.«5 li.O
11.1 875.7 10.67 9,J
17.7 7/9,0 18,61 10,£
27.2 657.2 16.31 12.5
19.6 662.5 15.19 12.0
12'.3 1226.5 16.27 6.1
«9.6 575.6 13.25 13.3
17.5 628.0 13.78 13.3
30.0 57U.3 11.01 11.0
19,5 739.7 15.71 11.J
92.1 676.6 12.71 10.6
58.8 791.0 1H.12 9.9
89.1 896,5 19.13 8.1
13.7 557.2 16.H6 15,1
11.9 656.6 17.96 13.0
36,0 936.0 19.59 0.7
26.5 682.7 19.01 12.1
11.2 750,8 19.28 11.3
62.6 805.0 19,3ft 9.6
19.7 561,3 15,27 1«,8
31.5 667.0 15.80 12.2
59.3 959.1 17.71 8.3
SUM
Bag
2.26
?.11
17.5
18.9
188.0 9.16 17.0
518.2 8.76 16.0
2.31 16.5 196.1 9.56 16.8
2,55 22,0 511,0 9,01 15.1
3.19 21.8 637,9 11.55 12,9
3.57 37,8 695.3 11,61 11.6
33
0.59
15.2
96.0
0,57
72.9
0.50
15.1
83,8
0, 18
81,1
0,77
17.2
92.3
o.ia
72.9
31
5.96
165,9
951.3
1.59
7.0
5,85
182.2
986,0
1 .18
6.9
8.10
208,8
916.2
2.59
6.8
35
2.11
63.3
573.0
0,26
13,0
2.53
70.1
566.6
0.61
13.0
3.97
69.9
602.3
1.16
12.2
36
1 .65
21.7
511.2
1.15
16.0
l.«2
18.6
511.2
0.86
16.2
2.52
29.5
169. b
1.23
16.3
37
1.70
5.1
356,5
3,88
21.0
1.56
1.0
328.9
3.26
26.1
2.25
3.9
111.0
7.65
20.9
38
1.62
1.5
395,9
6,97
21.7
1.56
1.1
390,2
6,71
22.1
2.27
1.5
510.3
1 3.18
16.0
39
1.56
1.6
156,5
1 1.29
18.9
1.51
1.5
158,1
1 1 ,16
18.9
1.73
5.3
632.2
15.17
13.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
JVO
-------
APPEND T X G,CONT'D
LISTING 'IF LOADED VFHICLfc TEST RESULTS On
VEHICLE lib 1967 HilIC LfSA 310
DETROIT
IwT = uoon, rlhp=i?,o ----
HIlDt FUEL
NO. HC CO CO? NO* FCON
IWT = U5001 HI.NP=l?.0
FUEL
hc cn en? nox tciiN
IwT=S000, KIHP=29.0
FIIFL
HC CO C02 NIJX ECC1N
12.85 99,7
10.OR 159,7
15.02 160,7
156.1
197.7
615.2
3,01 13.6
2.IS 11 .B
1.76 9.7
13.16 123.0
10.63 195.S
23.98 272.7
321.2
192.7
617.0
2.60 15.9
1.11 10.6
1.88 7.7
11.60 12?.7
9.88 206.9
21.27 283.1
306.6
539.B
616.6
2.71 16,6
2.10 9.9
2.10 7.6
u
5
6
7
8
9
I 0
1 1
12
8.05 92.3
1.21 68.1
i.OH 78,u
5.12 71.5
1.5" 99,9
5.75 81.1
6.11 97.7
7.51 108.1
7.16 122,3
351,8
377 .1
365.2
132.8
132.1
112.0
116.1
165.8
576, 3
1.95 16,9
3.5? 17,8
2,11 17.7
1.73 15.8
3.97 11,7
3.97 15.8
3.75 11.J
3.86 13.1
5.01 11,2
7.83 126.9
1.28 93.7
1,30 108.9
5.17 97.5
1,71 123,1
5.61 57.8
h.7i 115.1
8.03 125.1
7,99 159.9
360.9
381.5
371. 1
110,7
162.1
177.0
158.5
191.1
577.1
2.33 15.2
3.31 16.3
1.97 15.9
5.05 11.5
3.86 13.2
1.03 15.2
3.73 13.1
5,03 12,1
1.75 10.1
8.31 135.9
1.69 115.2
1.73 130.6
6,23 1H.7
6.11 180.6
7,06 119,3
8.11 I 76.7
9.61 171,9
10.31 237,5
U09.8
u«2.1
17 7,0
511.1
657.6
593.5
698.0
652.8
818.7
2.81 13.7
?.«9 13,9
3.01 12.7
6.08 11.9
5.82 9,2
7.5b 11,0
5.98 H,9
5.63 9.J
6.76 7.1
13 9,7? 126.3 569.8 1,28 11,1 10.01 117,0 587.0 1.82 10.1 11.98 203.1 711.3 6.21 H.l
|1 5.82 108.7 107.1 3,21 11.9 5.98 122,6 137.9 3,21 13.7 7,18 1«3.7 623.3 1.73 «,S
15 11.62 113,1 106,9 ?.02 H.l 15.31 118.5 10H.1 1.68 12.9 17.97 186.3 558.9 2.67 9.8
16
1 7
18
39.58 259,1
10.8« 117,0
7.3« 131.3
7H.8
171 .9
1 J3.6
2,56 7.1
2.60 12.9
1.88 13,1
10.12 370,3
10.79 162.1
7.3B 16b.6
725. 1
161. 3
132.6
2.05 6.2
3.15 1 1 ,R
1.72 12,1
17.29 131,6
13.23 190.8
9.22 181.6
887 .1
55 5 .9
525.u
3.13 5.2
2.81 9.V
?.6l 10.5
19 9.15 115.5 130.1 2.35 13.8 9.70 119,2 111,3 2.61 12.6 11,69 166.5 511.3 2.91 10.7
20 9.31 151,1 178.1 1.98 11.8 9.81 192.1 191.7 1,98 10.8 11.38 222.3 629.9 }.|9 S.7
?1 8,99 U2.6 557.5 5.35 11 .6 9,39 165.0 568.9 5.56 10,3 10,13 205.5 658.0 5.01 B.B
22
23
21
8.05 115.2
19.95 138.0
5.11 90,6
519.1
631 .3
121,5
3.89 1? .2
1.68 9.7
3.69 15.2
8.87 168.2
21.81 207.2
5.97 105.2
519.0
619.6
111.1
1.07 10.5
1.16 8.5
3.32 11.2
9.97 232.6
23.3i 257.1
8,11 111.9
728. 1
752.6
557.3
1 .HO 7 . -J
3.95 7.2
1.16 10.9
25 1.88 88,t) 109,8 3. 19 15,7 5,11 95.5 110.1 2.87 15.1 ft.99 1U9.0 572.8 1.99 10,7
26 20.1? 112,9 557.6 2.81 10.5 ?0,07 199.8 718,8 2.31 7.9 22.19 231.2 711.8 J.75 7.7
?7 8,58 108.9 511.9 2.71 12,1 9,02 H6.8 506.9 1.00 11,6 9.80 178,7 669.5 5.05 9.0
28 8.15 102,? 156.1 3.68 15.8 9,15 133,2 153.5 1.18 12.8 9.52 171.1 652,5 u.68 9.3
29 18.77 123.9 560.9 J.B3 10,9 20,72 189,0 556,0 6.36 9.7 21,73 238,3 679.2 J.HS 7.9
30 5.55 72.5 113.1 3.36 15.1 6.11 131.9 112.6 1.55 13.2 6,69 155.2 559.7 1.0H 10.8
31 5.H 109,2
32 17.82 157,1
129.5
602.8
3.15 11.1
2.68 9.8
5.19 138,1
19.10 362,2
117,1
573.1
2.91 13.0
8.52 7,1
6.21 155.3
20.65 239.1
598.8
737.B
1.97 10.3
1.38 7.5
SUM 6,02 103,3 u 31.1 3,28 H.l
HAT. R. 39 1 1 1 .9 171 . 1 3,66 13.2
6,50 122.7
6,76 116.1
ill ,1
192. 1
3.57 13.6
3.55 11.8
7.81 117.2
9.9? 181,7
581.0 5.31 10.6
636.9 «.R7 9,5
33
2.39
?6.5
17.9
0,03
91.1
2.71
?3 . 3
18.9
0 , 01
91,3
3.11
??. 1
17,9
0,07
95.8
31
27. 79
306.8
562.3
0.31
7.8
26.R9
28?.0
628.1
0.37
7.7
30.99
216.1
520.8
0.26
9.3
35
1 ? , 1 7
?1 7.7
105.5
0.10
11.3
1 3. 16
203.6
381 .0
0.10
11.9
13.51
193.9
U09. 0
0.21
11.7
36
5.51
111,1
311,6
0,10
16.1
6.85
158.1
288 ,8
0,10
15,9
7.17
165. 1
311.9
0,16
11,9
37
3.21
87.3
298.7
0.17
19.9
0.36
92.0
289.5
3.23
20.1
3.95
96,1
356.6
1 . 01
17.0
38
3.10
98.1
312. 1
1,62
17.5
3.12
96.7
350.1
1 .80
17.3
3.87
'5, 1
180,9
1,90
13,8
39
3.17
80.1
111.6
1.99
16.1
3,18
81.2
116,1
1.95
16,0
3.62
85, 3
612,9
9.70
11.'
EMISSION Pfc SUL T S IN GRAMS PEW MILE (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUFL FCONOMY IN MILtS PtR GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARHflN TO HYDROGEN RATIO
J9
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 166 1967 CADI DEVI <129
DETROIT
.... IHT*5000, RLHPnlO.7
....
IWT«5500, RLHPs11.7
....
IWTO6000, RLHPa32.0
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO,
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
1
7.61
93.1
152.8
2.21
11.2
7,23
1 16.3
162.3
2.10
13.3
7.52
131.3
535.1
2,30
11.5
2
8.86
111.2
625.0
2,79
10.1
8,71
160.3
625.2
2,61
9,8
8,11
157,3
701.0
4,06
9.1
3
14.25
181.2
861.0
J.1J
7.5
13.66
210,7
873.6
2.96
7.1
12,83
203.2
973.1
1,11
6.7
a
6.03
92.5
500.7
3.59
13.3
5.88
105.3
193.0
3.83
13.1
5.62
119.5
551.0
1,31
11.7
5
1.33
72.5
197.7
5.37
11.2
1.38
92.1
166.2
1.39
14.2
1.17
139.1
522.8
3,19
11.7
6
a.38
55,6
157.9
1 ,91
15.9
1.33
73.B
156.1
1.21
15,1
1.31
93.7
582,3
6,61
11.9
7
5.81
152.8
533.7
1.15
11.2
5,81
165,1
518,5
1,23
11.1
5,82
185.7
607.0
5,98
9.3
e
1.75
88.5
526.0
6.18
13.0
1.83
99.8
510.2
6.67
12.5
1.65
122.9
730.0
9.13
9.5
9
5.58
111.7
525.1
5.39
12.3
5,66
118.7
. 515,7
5,15
12.1
5,10
H8.1
671.0
7,89
9.6
10
6.19
78,6
558'. 3
7.16
12.7
6,20
85.0
575.7
7.11
12.2
6,07
119,3
808.8
10.51
8.7
11
6,39
169.1
559.7
3.89
10.5
6.89
220,1
569,7
3.18
9.5
6.69
211 .6
677.1
3.96
B.2
12
7.22
107,3
689.5
8.96
10.1
7.73
127,5
700.1
8.65
9.6
7.58
197.1
963.9
10.16
6.8
13
7.10
201.5
622.0
1.18
9.2
7,98
231.1
651.2
1.05
8.5
7.IS
287.5
789.2
1.85
7.0
ia
5.31
98.8
536.7
6.15
12.5
5.71
107,6
520,3
5.55
12.5
5.67
135.0
690.9
7.9B
9.6
15
10.55
127,1
521.9
3,60
11.7
1 1.36
128.8
517.2
3.56
11.7
13,99
162.9
651.1
1.60
9.3
tt>
21.13
293,9
1061.9
5.19
5.5
25.57
292.3
1029.3
5.13
5.7
23.26
318.1
1256.3
6.19
1.7
17
6.71
171,0
506,5
2.71
U.l
7,15
193.7
519,9
2.26
10.5
7.18
211.2
521.1
2.00
9.5
IB
6.27
118,8
511 .5
1.36
11.9
6,63
128.0
560.6
1.53
11.3
6.57
188.6
663.1
1.91
9. 1
19
6. 79
126,3
512.6
1.27
12. 1
7.13
169.0
187.6
2.86
11.1
6.79
205.1
169.7
2.32
10.6
an
6.13
116,9
639.2
5.21
9.9
8.75
165.1
663,0
1.77
9.3
B.17
212.6
780.6
5.73
7.8
21
7.11
213,5
561.3
3.91
9.7
7.17
237.6
619,6
1.01
6.7
7.69
300.5
656,5
3.28
7.7
22
7.61
1 38. 1
657.9
6.98
9.9
7.87
116,2
658, 1
6,85
9.7
8.25
210.6
825.5
B.06
7.5
25
12.12
151.3
760,1
7.13
8.5
12.11
163.7
821.5
7.51
7.9
12.56
252.6
959.2
6.R6
h.1
20
5.17
131.3
193,7
1,21
12.1
5,13
160,5
521,6
3.IB
11.2
5,72
228.2
563, B
3.02
9.1
25
1,76
66,6
530.9
5.95
13.0
5.21
103,7
523.6
6.1 3
12.6
5.16
110.5
653,8
7 .15
10.0
26
11.05
176.3
772.0
5.69
8. 1
15.15
1H6.7
715.7
5.60
8.2
11.27
231.6
916.1
6 . H 3
6.7
27
6.H
167, 1
566,5
1.68
10,1
6. 79
205.7
561.1
3.90
9.6
7.33
291 .1
660.6
2.93
7.8
28
6.91
99.8
597.1
7.22
11.1
7.61
105,5
597.3
6.97
11.3
7.67
170.1
736.6
8.63
8.6
29
10.89
131.1
699.8
8.27
9. 1
l l.7l
153.3
780,1
•6,17
8.1
10.60
211.2
860.7
6.62
7.1
JO
5.13
169.7
5H.1
3.90
11.1
5.81
223.0
561.5
3.05
9.5
6.08
271.0
595.1
3.01
B.5
31
5.01
113,6
536.5
5.35
12. 1
5.16
1 11.9
503.1
5.63
12.7
5.88
167.8
683.3
6.51
9.2
32
13.16
189.6
767.7
5,?1
B. 0
11.75
190.2
712.3
5.52
8.1
11,19
251 .2
932, 4
6.23
6.5
SUM
5.27
101,8
531.7
5.71
12.1
5.16
116.2
513.3
5,66
1 1.9
5.62
116,1
667.6
7.31
9.7
RAG
5.85
136,1
586.5
5,05
10,8
6.35
158,0
599,B
1,97
10.2
6.51
201.1
731.9
5.93
B.3
33
0.52
B.9
82.8
0.13
90. 1
0.58
11.2
88.6
0,17
82. 1
0.62
11.6
82,5
0.13
82.7
Ji
9.82
1 ?6,2
1032.0
1.38
7.0
9.51
166.9
1128.1
1.85
b.?
12.38
235,6
1168.8
2.22
5.6
35
3.80
56.3
570.6
0.16
13.2
3.78
67.1
596.5
0.37
12.1
1.B3
62. 1
629.9
0 . S6
1 1.5
36
5.17
111.3
119.5
0.35
13.1
5.31
109.2
111 . 3
0.28
U.l
5.19
117.0
170.6
0.19
12.1
37
3.56
86,5
336.7
0,93
IB.3
3.18
B7.9
335,1
0.8B
18.3
3.91
97.6
100.0
1 .78
15.7
38
3.03
56,1
111,6
5.17
16.1
2.92
53.8
155,1
5.51
16.2
3.15
19,6
579.7
9.66
13,3
39
2.76
37.3
521.9
10.31
15.0
2.72
35.6
529.S
10.61
11.9
3.10
33.9
710.9
11.15
11.5
EMISSION
RESULTS IN GRAMS PF R MILE (PER MINUTE
FOR IDLF)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILFS
PER GALLON
(MINUTES PER GALLUN FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBON Til HYDROGEN RATIO
90U
-------
APP(- NO t X G.CUNT'D
LISTING MF LOADED VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 169 1967 CHEV IMPA 283
Df TROIT
IM = UOOO, RLHPr|?,0 - — -
¦- H»ToO500. Rl HPs 12, 0
... IHTsSOOO, RLHPs27.9
MOOF
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NflX
FUEL
F.CON
HC
rn
C02
NOX
FUEL
ECON
HC
1
2
3
6.50
7.30
12.50
86.0
116,0
187.2
397.2
531 .0
693.2
2.91
2.66
3.13
17.6
12.1
8.6
5.55
8.27
12,79
66. 0
126.2
179.1
367.8
591.2
7 7 6,2
3.35
2.97
3.35
18.1
11,6
8.1
9.87
6.ai
10.96
9
5
ft
5.27
3.91
9.07
B2.6
62.3
65.1
383.7
388.3
396.1
3.50
1.88
2.79
16.7
17.8
17.9
5.12
3,66
3.92
83.8
63.5
62. 1
923.9
920.9
392.7
2.19
3.86
9,09
15.5
16.7
17.7
9.59
3.97
9,97
7
8
9
5.08
9.50
9,66
101.9
82.3
66,7
919.9
929.9
991 ,9
5.29
*.55
6.75
15.0
15.5
15,8
9.32
9.50
9,59
89.2
87. 1
68.9
955.6
998,2
957 ,8
9.37
5.32
5.82
19.6
19.8
15.3
5.88
5.23
5,69
1 0
1 1
12
5.96
5.62
6.75
69.9
108.2
93.9
986.9
990.2
565.2
9.10
6.21
5.H
19.5
19.1
12. 1
5,36
5,20
6.53
72.1
110,7
100.5
503.1
999,6
601.0
6.90
5.77
7.58
19.0
12.9
1 1.9
6.26
6.59
7.98
1 3
19
15
6.70
9.80
8.28
129.3
79.1
91,9
523.7
120.8
136.9
6.18
9.31
2."6
11.9
16.1
19,6
6.75
5.18
8.28
1 35.6
86,6
99.5
582.0
992.5
959.7
6.50
6.85
3.27
10.9
19.9
13,8
8,11
6.00
9,59
16
1 7
18
19.19
5.77
5.52
219, J
110.5
89.7
825.9
9 19,8
990 ,8
3.89
3.79
3.22
7.2
19,5
U.8
19.03
5.83
5,82
209.9
129,9
123.3
867. 1
191, 9
918,8
9.67
9,00
3.79
7.1
12.9
13.9
20.75
6,68
6.55
19
20
21
5.57
6.89
6.18
81.0
97.3
139.6
905.3
521 .2
996.7
3.97
9.50
5.87
16,1
12.8
12.1
5,91
7.72
7,01
119.5
199,7
197.0
951,8
196,1
567.6
3.90
3.96
7.00
13.5
11.9
10.8
6.29
8,90
7.27
??
23
29
6 . 2g
10.11
9.19
102.1
1 37.6
69.5
510 .8
692.2
9 50,9
5.01
5.99
5.73
12.3
10,0
15.7
6.92
10.79
9.32
112,7
138.9
70.0
521.3
676. 5
195,9
6.71
6.28
6.27
12.3
9.6
19.3
7.62
12.56
5.71
25
26
27
«. 1 1
t! .51
5.32
58.6
119.2
95.3
939.6
666 .1
999.8
9.92
5.05
6.12
16.9
10.0
1 J.3
9.31
12.92
5.63
61,0
1 19.2
128. 1
939,6
690.9
521 .0
6.09
5.69
5.69
16.3
10.2
12.0
5.39
12.56
6.86
28
29
30
5.91
9,52
'J. 30
82,5
123.6
65.a
989.6
691 . 1
502,3
9.86
5.93
6.80
19.0
10.3
11.3
6.16
9.32
9.57
77.9
101.1
105.8
501.9
691.1
156.2
6.11
6.61
9.19
1 3.8
10.7
13.9
6.91
10.27
5,66
31
32
9.39
1". 70
68.8
125.7
012.9
613.7
9.33
9,56
16.6
10.5
9.70
1 1 .75
83.5
127.5
950.6
695.9
5.92
5.36
19.9
10.0
5.21
5.32
CO
C02
FUEL
NO* ECQN
67.5
110.9
69,1
77.1
99. 1
160. J
S9| .2
827.3
965. 3
968. 0
907. 7
572. <4
622. 7
587.6
689.a
603.8
828.2
679.8
596.2
589.5
16 1 , 1
558.6
U52.9
660.6
5AU.9
717.6
8U2.9
SI 0.6
577.7
807.6
588.5
6 39.6
7 92.0
501 .7
J.ne 18.«
3.57 It.J
9, 9 7 7.9
«.16 15.1
9,93 19.7
«.3i 13.5
7.28 11.1
7,39 10,8
8,02 11,3
8.72 9,8
7.12 in,1
9.55 7.9
8.13 8.9
7.20 10.9
0,80 10.5
6.10 5.8
3.86 12,3
1,35 10.6
3.90 13.1
5.31 8.9
5.95 10,0
7,60 8.7
7,92 7.9
5,37 11.8
6.80 11.0
6.9U 7.5
5.85 9.9
7.30 9.9
7.91 8.5
u.71 11./
763.7 6.59
11.0
7.7
SUM 5.02
HA f, 5,72
00.1
93.9
951 .3
987 . 1
9.75 15.0
9.97 13.6
5.13 85.0
6.09 101.6
972.2
511.9
5.20 19.3
5.99 12,9
5,68 117.1
6,99 197.5
583.0
628.9
6.89 11.3
6.56 10.1
33
1.26
21.9
67.9
0.17
89. 1
1.25
17.0
66.3
0.10
91.6
1.21
18.5
73.6
0.18
83.3
3i
15.18
218.0
727 .8
0.53
7.6
13.33
195.2
759.0
0.58
8,0
12.92
1 79.9
771.3
0.69
8.1
35
7.20
105.6
950.9
0.29
13.9
6.75
91.0
117,9
0.32
19.5
6.32
76.3
195.2
0.10
11.0
36
9.80
80.8
327 .9
0.33
18.9
9,98
69,5
390.7
0.J9
10.1
u.05
58.0
359.8
0.92
19.1
37
3.53
50.9
309. 1
1 .23
22.2
J.91
57.0
328.2
1 .66
20.6
9.32
83.0
391.3
1.19
18.3
38
3.55
60.5
363.3
3.35
18.9
3.59
55.3
387.5
3.99
18.3
9.07
66.0
517.5
6,19
19.0
3<»
3.53
51.6
95?. 1
6.63
16.2
3.97
53.9
963.1
7.29
15.9
3.97
53.6
638.1
11.31
12. 1
frMISSILIN RtSULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE (PER MINUTE FUR IDLE)
FUFL ECHnmmy IN mILFS PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSIIMF A 111.85 CARRON TO H YOROGfc N RATIO
9 (J L
-------
APPEND!* G.CONT'D
LISTING I IF LOADFD VEHICLE TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 170 1967 CHEV STAH J27
DETROIT
[WTO4500, RLHP=13.2
....
IWT»
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING riF LOADED VEHICLt TEST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 171 1967 CHPY NEwP 385
DETROIT
I«T=O00O, PLHP=I3.2 IWT=O50O, HLHP = U,2 --— I*T = S0O0, RLHPs29.0
MODE
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NfIX
FUEL
ECON
HC
en
C02
NOX
FUEL
tCON
HC
CO
C02
NOX
FUEL
KON
1
0.35
85.6
560.5
3.59
12."
0,20
123,9
587.0
3.07
11.2
0 ,69
72.7
533.9
3.25
13.0
2
0.71
85. 1
697.0
3.11
10.5
5.17
81.3
700.7
3.90
10.5
".72
125,1
716,8
3.00
<».o
3
7.16
1 03.2
1056.5
2.87
7.1
7.26
73.3
1090.9
0. 36
7.2
7.57
171,0
1123.9
3.91
6.3
a
3.59
98. 0
519.0
2.02
13.0
2.81
26,0
590,2
0,60
13.8
3.67
73,5
617,0
0.21
1 1
5
<.06
1 02.9
059.1
2.61
10.1
2.20
0 1.6
523,0
5.16
10.9
3.05
60.0
570 . 1
5.69
13.1
6
2.90
71 .6
"39.1
1.11
15.8
2.18
26.2
517. ft
«. 10
15.7
2.68
61.1
592.0
0.55
12.7
1
3.32
99.9
097.0
5.73
13.0
3.26
128.8
557.2
5.65
11 .5
0.19
109,2
617,1
7.13
11.1
8
J.?''
8b. 1
502.0
3,76
13.7
3.27
80,8
553.0
0.56
12.7
S.29
205,b
605.3
0. 50
8.5
9
3.17
71.2
505.9
5. 38
l".l
3.02
123.1
536.0
0.83
12.0
0.63
108.8
638. 1
7.26
10,0
1 0
3.26
50,5
580.7
0,07
13.2
0.17
76,8
591.0
3.81
12.2
5.9J
200.0
710.0
«.n«
7.9
1 1
5.92
10.97 65.2 1257,2
«.69 166.0 578,3
0.28 133.0 567.1
5.59 8.9
3.03 12.8
2.71 12.5
3.90 6.2
0.22 10. <1
2.09 11.2
O.uo 102.0 517.1 3.00 11.8
5.50 168.1 655.3 2.70 9.5
5.08 203.9 617.9 5.69 9.3
6.11 188,0 619,7
7.68 102.7 853.6
3,35 98.8 500.0
3.31 68,5 507.8
6.57 61.0 881.2
0.86 192.2 587.0
5.25 99,6 601.5
6.80 101.8 819.8
3.51 112.8 501.1
3.35 9.5
6.52 8.1
5,65 12.6
".11 13.3
0.03 8.9
0.70 9.8
3.32 11.5
5.71 8.9
5.68 12.2
7.23 293.0 793 .6 t,.87
5.92 200.9 632.8 1.92
5.03 128.2 702.9 3.06
11.66 1H5.0 1027,2 0.55
5.07 216.9 610.9 3.90
5.90 203.0 608.1 1.87
5.57 193,0 579.7 <.80
5.68 159,7 792.5 0.79
6.01 255.5 713.1 h.90
7.91 319.6 760.0 3.58
9.63 329.3 938.6 3.03
5.63 239.8 553.5 3. 36
6.09 276.5 601.0
9.08 196.9 970.1
6.87 279,8 687.0
6.95 236,9 720.5
8.16 212.3 907.7
0,92 189.6 592.0
3.61
6.72
86. 1
8?.7
571.9 0.19 12.3
878.0 0.69 8.6
6.35 202.5
8.82 196,1
606. 5
961 .5
2.00
o. 30
5.35
2.96
5.71
5.07
3.25
0.50
6.9
8.6
9.6
5.1
9.2
8.8
9.9
8.0
7.8
6.9
6 . 0
9.0
8 .a
6.8
7.7
8.0
7.0
9.8
8.8
6.8
SUM
2.62 57.3 577,9 0.60 13.1
3.65 83,J 597,0 0.90 12,0
3.25 85.0 583.9 0.11 12.2
0.08 129,9 619.2 0,03 10.6
0.55 155,2 687.0 5.16 9.0
5.98 232,7 707.7 0,65 H.l
33
0.05
1.5
1 08.6
0,00
78,9
0, "9
2.7
110.7
O.flo
76.2
0.09
2.6
1 09.5
0,03
77.0
30
5,00
12.2
1256.9
1 .22
6.9
5.72
26.8
1335.1
1.S9
6.0
5.25
12.0
1281 .7
1.22
6.7
35
2.61
6.0
600.9
0.58
13.0
2.53
6."
640,5
0.56
13.0
2.61
5.6
6t>0 .6
0 . 60
13.1
36
1 .82
o,2
510,0
0.78
16.9
1.75
3.7
516.3
0.71
16,8
1 .88
3.6
536.6
0. 70
16.1
37
0.9 D
3.8
063.6
1.95
18,8
1.07
o.O
061.9
2.00
18.8
1.13
0.9
089.2
2.73
17.7
38
1.02
12.5
097.5
3.76
17.1
0.99
12.3
516,0
3.92
16.5
1 .85
31.2
602.9
5.91
1 5.5
39
1.70
00 , 7
500,5
5.02
1". 3
1.53
"0.6
537,2
0,59
10.6
2.90
91.6
758.0
8.21
9.7
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILt (PER MINUTE FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN miles PFR GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLt)
FUEL FCOnOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.85 CARBfJN TO HYDROGEN RATIO
ooj
-------
APPENDIX G,CONT'D
LISTING OF LOADED VEHICLE TFST RESULTS ON
VEHICLE 174 1967 FORD GAL A 289
DFTROIT
.... IWT=4000, RLHPe12,0
....
.... I*Ta4500, RLMP
= 12,0
....
IwTs5000» RLHPS27.4
....
MODE
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
NO.
HC
CO
C02
NOX
ECON
HC
CO
CU2
NUX
ECON
MC
CO
C02
NOX
E CON
1
6,31
162,8
457,5
3.87
12.1
5,98
172,6
403,7
2.93
12.1
7,96
100,4
426,4
2,77
12.1
2
6,33
160.5
535.9
4.67
11,0
6.63
177.7
547.6
4.07
10.5
8.32
203,5
628.2
4,62
9.1
J
11.11
300,7
756.7
4,74
7,0
11,57
322.6
789,5
4,85
6.7
13,37
318,4
851,3
5,53
6.4
4
4,79
136.1
411,9
3.76
13.8
4,87
137,0
413,0
3,76
13.8
5,68
137,3
464.1
4,77
12.7
5
3.21
87,5
392.0
5.11
16.4
3.29
94.6
390,0
" .53
16.2
3.77
77.1
450. 1
6,05
IS.2
b
3.13
72.1
364.3
3.88
18.2
3.11
71.5
372.9
4.48
17.9
3.87
89.2
476.4
6,28
l«.l
7
3.83
101.8
414.6
4.62
15.1
3.70
110.6
400.6
4.36
15.1
4.40
105,7
468. 7
5.48
13.7
B
3.49
103.4
419.B
5.08
15,0
3.41
105,8
414,8
4.65
15.0
4.06
177.3
596.9
6.95
10.0
9
2.72
83.9
416.5
5.89
15.9
1,35
88.a
392.3
1.73
16.3
5.44
120,5
531.0
7.25
1?.0
10
4.91
81.0
443,9
5.80
15. 1
4,87
85.4
434.7
5.41
15.2
6.1 1
147.6
627.2
8.54
10.1
11
5.07
141.5
434.3
3.17
13.2
4,84
143,8
440.8
3.63
13.0
5.90
182.4
572.3
5.94
10.1
12
6.01
126.3
532,3
6.28
11. B
5,67
126.3
579.6
6,99
11.1
7,65
212.2
795.2
10.35
7.7
13
5.3«
137.1
532,8
.1.03
11.6
5.16
135.9
536.8
4.98
11.6
7,56
208.3
687.5
6.1?
R.5
14
" .23
81,9
405,3
6,32
16,2
4,09
92.1
408,4
4.28
15.7
5.60
153,7
577.0
6.98
10.6
15
7,69
134.6
405,4
3.23
13.8
OD
Cm
3>
146.1
394.2
2.63
13.6
10.01
107.8
521.1
4.10
10.5
16
20,49
343.8
77/.I
4.10
6.4
11 .28
324.2
740.8
3.59
6.9
20. 32
401 .3
898.5
5.39
5.6
17
6.13
133,3
403.2
4.78
14.0
3,14
133.3
462.8
4,82
13.0
6.47
183.0
559.8
4.13
10.2
IS
4.80
93.9
466.3
5.35
l«.l
3.15
103.8
470,9
5.19
13.8
5.70
150.0
539. 1
4.90
11.2
19
5.00
119,6
379,8
4.08
15.2
3.43
125.5
421.9
3.53
l«.l
6.20
177.0
496. 0
3.17
11.2
20
5.98
128.0
533.4
5.41
11,8
7.76
146, 1
546.7
4.56
11.1
7.29
193.0
634. 1
5.50
9.2
21
5.12
156,3
484,8
4.05
11.9
5.28
186.8
511.2
4.23
10.8
5.95
189,8
544.0
4.00
10.3
22
6.11
131 .6
497.0
5.36
12.3
6.95
150.9
551.5
5.27
10.9
7.27
209.0
731.7
7.14
8.2
2 J
9.69
204,1
622.6
6.54
9.1
11.36
205.3
667.6
6.88
8.6
11.33
261.7
807.3
4.75
7.1
24
3.48
85.0
416.4
5.88
15.8
3,80
86.0
447,7
6,12
14.9
4.69
132.7
S02.9
4,63
12.2
25
3.50
66,0
406.2
5.79
17.0
3.79
79,B
449.1
5.96
15.1
3.99
132.5
551.4
7.15
11.5
26
9,66
172.9
587.4
5.18
10,0
11,25
175.7
592.5
4 .99
9.B
12.20
220.7
7 70.4
7.13
7.7
27
4.33
117,9
477,5
5.99
13.1
4.BO
131.5
546.2
6.09
1 1.6
4.90
101.1
597.6
3.63
9.9
28
5.01
88.8
403,6
5,10
15.9
5,36
101,9
491 ,8
5,89
13.3
6.79
161,8
633.6
7.14
9.8
29
7.76
178.4
546.0
5.74
10.4
8.48
178.4
609.5
6.76
9.7
9.88
208,0
736.1
fl.91
8.1
30
3.60
99,0
390,9
4.75
15,9
3.71
102.6
420.7
4,48
14.9
4.90
134,9
540.5
5,65
1 1.6
31
3,68
92.1
417.3
4. 39
15,5
4,04
112.2
459.5
4.75
13.7
5,17
170.4
592.3
7.29
10,1
32
9.63
203,7
572.7
4.32
9.6
I 1 .48
207.8
612.7
7.55
9.1
1 3,00
265,3
762.2
6.03
7.3
SUM
«.12
100,0
422.9
5.14
15.0
4.14
101.9
440,4
5.14
14.5
5.07
130.3
565.6
7.49
11.3
RAG
4.86
1 14.5
460.5
5.30
13.5
4.83
130.0
483.6
5.02
12.6
5.86
185.9
612.5
6.32
9.6
33
0.95
37.4
70.0
0,35
67,3
1 ,05
37.0
86.2
0.39
60.1
1.29
44.2
98.6
0,57
51 .6
34
9.47
409,8
684.9
0.52
6.5
12,10
421,1
921.9
2,56
5.5
1 1.85
422.0
726,6
0,63
6.2
35
10.87
278.9
«5«.8
0.52
9.6
7.42
217.6
492.1
0.63
10.3
7.89
232.2
477.5
0,52
10.2
36
4.20
140,4
309.8
0.30
16.3
4.31
126.3
340.6
0.37
16. 1
4.74
131.3
349.8
0.38
15.5
37
2.93
84,4
276.2
1.39
21. 1
2.99
76.7
283.7
1.50
21.3
3,09
74.1
342.a
2.93
18,9
38
2.42
49,3
337,5
4.87
21.0
2.46
45.5
358,9
5.45
20.3
2,90
49,4
466.3
8.69
16.0
39
2.«7
53.7
409,8
7.32
17.7
2.24
45,8
395,3
7.42
18.7
2,85
49,5
588.5
13,76
13,1
EMISSION RESULTS IN GRAMS PER MILE
(PER MINUTE
FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY IN MILES
PER GALLON (MINUTES PER GALLON FOR IDLE)
FUEL ECONOMY CALCULATIONS ASSUME A 111.65 CARBON TO HYDROGEN RATIO
W*
-------
Appendix H - Listing of Individual Sound Level Tests
Legend
VEII NO. - Vehicle Number
YR - Model Year
MAKE - Vehicle Make
MODI, - Vehicle Model
Cin - Engine Displacement in Cubic Inches
T - Type of Transmission (1 : automatic, 3 : 3-speed manual,
4 : 4-speed manual, 5 : 5-speed manual)
DB - Dry Bulb Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
WB - Wet Bulb Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
BAR. - Barometric Pressure (inches Hg)
WIND MPH - Wind Speed (miles per hour)
WIND DIR - Wind Direction (measured as shown below)
7
\ 1
5—> . ^1
Microphone
3
J986A (WOT) - Sound
Level
Measured
Using the J986A Procedures (decibels)
1/4 G. - Sound
Level
Measured
at
0.25 G Acceleration (decibels)
CRUISr. 20 - Sound
Level
Measured
at
20 MPH Cruise (decibels)
CRUISE 40 - Sound
Level
Measured
at
40 MPH Cruise (decibels)
CRUISE 60 - Sound
Level
Measured
at
60 MPH Cruise (decibels)
IDLE DB - Sound
Level
Measured
at
Idle (decibels)
IDLE FT - Distance from Vehicle to Microphone for Idle Sound Level Measure-
ment (feet)
Test
Track
405
-------
AP 'ENDIX H
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL SOUND LEVEL TEST RESULTS
SAN
ANTONIO
_ __
—SOUND LEVLLS
(DECIHELS)—
VEH
—WIND-
J986A
1/4
CRUISE
IMPH)
IDLE
NO.
YR
MAKE
MODL
CIO
T
nfl
W6
BAR.
MPH
OIR
AMB
(WOT)
G.
20
40
60
DB
FT
'11
69
TOYO
COW )
66
4
82
71
29.19
2
2
48
6o
75
59
69
75
63
6
02
73
nouG
CORO
318
1
82
71
29.19
2
2
49
74
65
57
6^>
74
63
6
m
74
OLDS
CUTL
350
1
82
71
29.19
3
2
49
72
67
58
65
75
64
7
04
74
CHEV
CAMA
350
1
88
65
29. 19
6
1
45
69
6"
59
65
68
63
6
OS
72
OLDS
CRUI
4 50
1
a (J
65
29. 19
6
3
38
72
64
5b
60
68
60
6
06
71
MERC
MONR
400
I
78
5')
29.21
4
1
36
78
69
57
66
71
58
6
07
70
VOLK
SEDA
97
4
7/
74
29.72
4
2
38
64
74
57
65
72
6r>
6
nq
69
-«)1C
SKYL
350
1
82
72
30.08
2
2
38
83
67
61
66
73
58
6
09
71
CHEV
IMPA
400
1
84
69
29.90
7
2
37
78
6t>
58
65
72
60
6
in
73
HUIC
CENT
350
1
84
70
30.04
2
1
37
76
6-
58
6^
72
57
6
) i
68
Ml JIC
WILD
430
I
83
70
30.04
5
1
37
68
65
58
64
68
65
6
12
69
CHRY
IMPE
4'tO
1
86
70
30.09
4
1
37
79
68
58
65
64
57
6
13
71
MERC
MARQ
429
1
90
64
29.21
4
3
38
69
67
5"
61
67
59
5
11
72
CHEV
LAGIJ
350
1
90
64
29.21
6
1
39
75
68
5'i
63
69
58
4
15
72
DATS
STAW
97
1
84
70
29.96
7
2
45
6r»
62
56
64
70
57
6
16
71
CHEV
KING
350
1
84
70
29.96
7
1
45
68
6o
57
64
70
54
6
17
71
FORD
LTD
400
1
84
70
29.96
6
2
45
78
70
54
64
70
53
6
ia
70
LINC
MRK4
460
1
84
70
29.96
7
1
46
74
64
60
64
69
51
6
19
69
VOLK
SEDA
97
4
85
72
29.83
7
2
44
6b
71
60
65
70
6 •
6
20
74
AMMO
GREM
232
1
85
72
29.83
6
2
44
65
64
57
65
70
52
6
21
72
AMMO
HORN
232
1
85
72
29.83
7
2
45
65
64
by
67
70
53
6
2^
72
PLYM
BARR
318
1
85
72
29.83
7
2
44
76
68
57
65
70
63
6
23
73
OLOS
88
455
1
85
72
29.72
7
2
45
80
68
5b
62
o 7
b°
6
24
70
CHEV
MONT
350
1
85
72
29. 72
7
2
45
76
67
b 7
63
68
61
3
2b
68
OLDS
442
400
1
85
72
29.72
7
2
44
71
66
58
6b
70
57
7
26
73
LINC
MRK4
460
1
80
74
29.64
4
2
39
74
66
56
64
68
3 7
6
27
73
AMI 10
HORN
258
1
80
74
29.64
4
2
39
69
68
57
64
6y
58
o
26
71
FORD
PINT
122
1
82
72
30.08
2
2
38
71
70
58
63
70
68
o
29
72
FORD
LTD
351
1
82
72
30. 06
2
2
38
74
66
54
63
68
56
6
30
72
VOLK
411
103
1
82
72
30. 08
2
2
38
78
69
6(J
or>
71
64
6
31
73
OLDS
DELT
350
1
82
72
30. 08
2
2
38
7«
6.
58
63
68
63
6
32
73
VOLK
SEOA
97
4
82
72
30.08
4
2
38
6<=>
74
61
6b
69
6 5
6
3 J
74
VOLK
SEDA
97
4
82
72
30.08
2
2
38
6ft
75
61
6t>
68
63
b
34
74
BUIC
LAND
45")
I
84
70
30. 04
2
2
37
74
67
56
63
67
62
6
35
73
FORD
GALA
351
1
84
70
30. 04
2
2
37
72
64
50
63
68
56
o
36
72
FORD
CUST
351
1
84
70
30.04
2
2
37
70
63
54
63
70
51
6
37
74
FORD
PINT
122
4
84
70
30.04
4
1
37
67
69
58
63
70
59
6
38
69
DODG
CORO
318
1
84
70
30.04
2
8
37
74
63
57
6b
69
60
6
39
70
CHEV
MALI
307
1
82
72
30.01
2
1
37
71
63
5b
63
70
59
6
40
69
FORD
MUST
200
3
82
72
30.01
2
1
37
72
71
58
64
69
62
6
41
6y
PONT
CATA
350
1
82
72
30.01
4
1
37
76
66
5S
64
69
56
r>
42
74
MERC
CAPR
122
4
85
69
29.92
4
2
18
72
68
58
64
69
60
6
43
69
OLDS
CIITL
350
1
85
69
29.92
4
2
38
74
6o
56
65
69
61
6
t+L.
74
TOYO
CORO
97
4
85
69
29. 92
4
2
38
64
71
54
62
68
54
6
U5
'2
TOYO
CELI
120
4
85
69
29. )2
4
2
38
66
72
b6
62
67
53
6
"6
74
CADI
COUP
472
1
84
69
29.90
7
2
37
7 '
67
b"1
62
6o
b 7
6
47
74
HUIC
LESA
350
1
84
69
29. QO
7
2
37
83
71
b6
63
70
58
6
46
74
AMMO
MATA
304
1
84
69
29.90
7
2
37
70
67
b6
64
69
60
6
4y
71
CHEV
MONT
350
1
84
69
29. 90
7
2
38
7b
64
36
63
66
61
6
50
73
FORO
RANG
351
1
84
69
29.90
7
2
37
78
68
57
f)i
71
62
o
51
72
VOLK
STAW
103
4
84
69
29. 90
7
2
37
68
72
60
6->
/I
67
6
52
73
TOYO
CELI
120
4
84
69
29. '0
7
2
37
65
70
b4
62
69
b"'
6
53
72
TOYO
CORO
97
4
84
69
29.90
7
2
38
69
62
b6
62
70
60
o
54
73
CHRY
NEWP
400
1
84
69
29.90
7
2
38
72
6'.
bT
62
67
59
6
5'i
69
FOR0
TORI
351
1
84
69
29. "0
7
2
37
73
6<>
58
65
70
54
6
56
74
TOYO
CORO
120
5
86
71
30.09
4
1
37
63
67
56
62
68
3«
6
57
72
DATS
510
97
1
86
71
30.09
4
1
37
67
b
bb
66
6M
6
bfi
72
FORD
RANC
302
3
83
70
24. 12
4
2
3n
63
64
57
63
70
63
5
5°
73
CADI
COUP
472
1
83
70
29. 12
4
2
3b
75
64
b7
6b
70
60
b
60
73
DODG
DART
21'5
1
HI
65
29. 15
7
7
42
73
64
b9
6'
71
60
3
406
-------
AP''ENDIX H»COHrfO
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL SOUND LEv/fCL TEST HESULTS
SAN
ANTONI^
•-SOUND LEVELS
DECItitLS)-
Vt_H
—WIND-
J986A
1/4
CRUISE
(MPH)
IDLE
NO.
rR
^tAKE
MODL
CIO T
DH
WS
UAR.
MPH
DIR
AM8
(WOT)
G.
20
40
60
!)hJ
FT
61
7 5
Frwn
MAVE
302 I
SI
65
29.15
8
7
42
72
65
56
63
68
61
5
62
75
OLDS
DELT
350 I
81
65
29.15
11
7
46
7b
64
sa
64
69
63
b
'»3
7.3
CHEV
NOVA
307 1
7a
5 )
29*21
5
7
36
74
64
58
6o
71
59
o
n7
59
65
J2
chl'v
MALI
307 I
7S
5*">
29.21
2
a
35
76
67
58
65
70
62
6
6
IS
FORD
PINT
12-f 1
7a
5b
29.21
7
i
37
75
68
59
67
/2
56
6
67
74
K0WIJ
PINT
123 4
7a
5'j
29.21
2
8
34
64
70
55
62
o9
62
6
6 b
72
POUT
GRNP
40fl I
78
5';
2°.21
4
l
36
71
69
58
65
71
61
6
6"
M
dlYM
SATA
318 I
78
5l>
29.21
6
7
39
73
63
5t>
64
68
56
5
7(1
73
CHEV
VEGA
l«0 3
79
57
29 20
7
8
38
6o
70
57
6
71
58
6
7 J
70
• UJIC
ELEC
«b'» 1
79
57
29.20
6
8
37
68
65
56
62
68
59
6
72
71
PONT
TATA
4 n l
79
57
29.20
7
8
38
74
73
5' i
62
n8
56
5
73
7 J
CHEV
NOVA
250 1
79
57
29.20
6
8
37
72
65
56
6n
73
5 ¦
6
7m
74
FORD
GR AN
351 I
79
57
29.20
6
a
37
73
66
53
60
o
60
f>
75
'2
PONT
GftNP
40 1 1
81
58
29.25
1
5
3b
70
6 6
57
b4
69
61
o
76
r>9
CMPY
JO
4'»0 1
HI
5ti
29.25
1
5
35
78
6u
57
63
67
59
4
7 '
7u
CmEV
\J€GA
140 3
81
58
29.2b
1
5
35
63
o9
58
63
69
b9
O
78
72
CHEV
CAPR
40 ) 1
81
61
29.27
7
I
37
7 I
68
57
64
68
56
)
79
7 J
PL VM
ROAD
4 »0 1
61
61
29.27
7
I
37
00
6* /
58
6b
69
64
O
on
/3
FORD
THUN
429 1
81
61
99.27
7
J
37
69
60
52
61
67
5/
o
8!
73
FORD
MAVE
20'i 1
81
61
29.27
7
1
37
6 -
61
56
63
6ri
b^
o
82
72
PONT
GRNV
45 j 1
81
61
29.27
7
\
37
7o
68
57
6^
70
61
•>
9"^
7 V
DOJG
DFMO
318 1
83
70
29.12
4
2
37
75
6(.
->r
64
69
5V*
n
84
71
FORD
rang
351 t
83
70
29. 1?
4
2
37
79
68
60
o 7
/2
5"
H1!
71
PONT
CAT \
350 1
83
70
29. 12
4
2
37
73
oH
52
59
68
.,u
r->
4 07
-------
Appendix I - Data Sheet from Idle. Contour Sound Level Measurements.
Each vehicle In this program was tested twice, once with the vehicle
at normal Idle and once with the vehicle Idling at 1800 RPM. The
data sheets Identify the vehicle by number, model year, make and model.
The test Is then Identified as to normal or 1800 RPM Idle. The site In
all cases is San Antonio, Texas. The sound level was then measured at
16 equally spaced radius lines (Increments of 22.5 degrees) at 16
different distances from the vehicle. The individual measurements
are identified on the data sheets by radius line and distance from center
of vehicle.
Interior sound levels were measured at each idle and with the engine
off with the windows both open and closed. These measurements are
identified at the bottom of the data sheets.
408
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No« Q°/ Year Nake Tgyg
Model Coro
ilormal Idle ^ QQ
1800 rpm Idle
Site
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
A/HB, V3.6
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 A8 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
*7,1
6t?.&
hU
f>y,?
Stf.1
57J
57.c
537/
*«.?
So. 1
y
56 J
51,7
51*
53.5
52,0
573
50,/
Y?q
17?
v,i
sf?/
5"?f
56,3
55&
tfV7
SS.R
s#5
57.7
1?./
m
i7/
15$
U(,
55.1
5ia
53 y
fff.9
502,3
576
5o.?>
YT.A
iti
%.Q
5^,3
m
5?.?
,57,
SIJ
^5"
S1A
53k
53 7
5f.ft
,5°.?
lis
yri
iri
16,0
1fj
5lf.ek
,rt,/
ft,.?
SLi
sv?
5/3
1X3
1H
17A
14&
5U
551
rvV
, ffi7
TU
SeJri
,W
5/.o
1Z>3
Irt
i70
152
11/
55.i
5i.O
5?!?
53V
5*3
5sP
51.3
S&o
y™
W.f
iio
16.7
151
Ws
53*3
Shfi
5r,1
r//
teb
Sot.O
57,y
5o5
if.n
y*V
no
15.1
Vi',o
5U
577
5*6.7
tfb/
553
fl-7
53 k
5d.*r
&P
^..7
5*7
r*/
5*7
53.?
51,0
5*5
T/.7
To.Q
lit
179
M
,f?/
^03
s5#?
firy
5V,f
SV.o
53./
Siti
57,6
50.?
m
1&
iv
%,3
Us
APd
57,3
57?
.51.6
537/
513
rar
5<3,a
r/.y
,5*0. f
,ro./
ltd
163
15.1
11,a
/.off
*/,y
^0,7
,ffc?
55$
53:a
stt
537
53.o
.57,7
SQfi
1M
¥76
16S
^,7
M.?
653
¦57/
sit
stfo
S7.1
5^
JV7
5U
53.0
foj
m
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX'O^XXXXXXXXXXXXJLXXyjOO:
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
closed
SIX
open | | closed
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open ^ | closed
Idle
1800
££L£_
409
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. QQf Year
Make
Wormal Idle
Model Cot a
1800 rpm Idle S
Site _cSLfl.
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AM8 H3.i>
Radius
Line 6
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
77.3
JW7
136
70 tf
£??
66-6
Ms
to,a
Ao.d
Stf,7
\5h^-
&tt
7/3
7fA
7dfb
A?,?
Mb
kSlQ
bio
A3,y
te.7
u.l
&o,o
S9J
5TP
71 tf
7U
70 3
£79
^,7
A/#
(*a.7
6vl>
5^3
Stfo
SI,7
5S1
69.3
7q,X
Ma
67k
^S"3
^3.3
b*7
6a I
6/.i
S97
syy
tt.J
\s~5,i
6?,?
111
b%Q
67.7
6o,s
.T7d
Sl.i
5f/
3~t> /
LSj
£3,0
l>a-a
Ud,
i?o,7
fal
5fe
37.?
flo
5Y-?
5\ol
6*3
kkl
ua
AA.f
^5Tai
ti 1.7
/$.?
6o,o
M
S7J
5T-?
SY.a
70,1
7/5
74. t
t?.?
<7?
&6. 6
Mi
4>oI(d
i'?
5tf.7
«:?
r/V
7ft 1
7Y/
7%3
U.l
fa.?
fa.l
UQ
5?,?
f7*>
5T7
S3.?
w
7ty
73,0
11.0
f>9,7
£33
urr
M
sy. 3
5T?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYxxxxyxxxro^ocmxxxxx>'x:oLx:cy.xxx
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
cloSPfl
closed
A3. 3
Idle
1800
AMBIENT LEVEL (dHA) Windows-open £ closed
410
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. do V Year /97V
•formal Idle V7S~ t)
Make Cter
1800 rpm Idle
Model Otitria
Site .
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AM 19.1
Radius
Line 6
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
(Ho
637
1?$
bd-to
J77
^5
S?.o
f>%£>
5^3
.r^ 3
5-35
S"3?.
LS.o
£3?
£o7
53^
s?i
>52,3
¦ttif
5V3
3
J5^/
&>,$
V 7 J
fay
(o^7
to?
syx
<7,?
.52.3
$Y?
r/-r
So, 5
455,0
yw
U?3
6,57
6a,o
4o0
sr$
5"4?
^5
S50
iYa
53;
5S6
y??
m
^5*
4.JO
syg
s-75
tt-J
syy
^TiiT
.53.0
355
y?,s
Uo
ff,?
7
57 3.
y;?
y?f
Anl
6o9
,57-3
577
.jra
^ya
5?y
S%S
&>i
s>,o
H7
y;3
60?
£>(Mn
,f>S*
53:^
5i(f>
53Tf
5*7
$y.o
520
Silo
573
SexSL
y?(f
ini
t>0?
S?7
52ft
m
5%.,3
53T4
5SP
5^
53.3
4>.y
&.7
50/3
h0/}
."T2>. 3
4?,?
,i?X
5*3.3
576
.54*
53.3
ni
C./S
Uf
«3?y
5^/
si 3
sir2
SW
53i>
5^,3
6b.?
&>,3.
V9.7
6/ 9
60 y
5"^
rf>S
srl*
Si"3
.^0
,r?ir
5*^7
&i
•sr/J
iff
iz*
W
S? 3
^r
57.0
%-x
53T3
ft?
5^,V
Sac
m
4,2 f>
is.*)
60.6
S%1
5^3
52 7
S7T8
St)
S3£
52 7
5?/
SI*
£ok>
sbo
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXrXXXXXXXXXX^'XXXXXXXXXXX'CC^COLXXX
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
SVJ
open
closed
closed
53 A
Idle
1800
AMBIENT
LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open tjj £ closed ^ £>
411
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Prop,rain
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. oo-f/ Year /9yV Make fJ,
iJormal Idle ___________ 1800 rpm Idle ^
Model a**, a
Site qS.H
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
A MB W. %
Radius
Line 6 9
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
Mi
7fC.7
7U>
7ts
73 5
7^o
7a2
Ut 3
t.lo
(n/,7
w
?fo
73 2
?'?
7b7
j
r?
iaS
s?.?
SH.1
£3$
7*75
73 ^
6>?4>
t#7
& 0
6Y1
67,0
(,a7
sxi
SI, 0
s?r/
12,3
hf
7ot>
^2
U,7
i$TJ
6V3
6 3,7
6 AD
£//
?7
b&i
W
£3i.o
iifa
bio
6*,?
(,JIP
SJ.3
SXq
r<,4
*?.?
7*7
7/0
6f.1
litf
^ 3,4
^3,o
£>3-)
bo .7
bo /
sy.a
syo
SSJ?
57.3
7/z
76.7
<,?#
£71
M IT
*ir.t
t-iio
<>3i
Ui
6
S-/.1
s??y
SVA
s*.?
5/5-
tit?
t>11
7o.o
6? 3
6X2
uy
i&n
(,3 2
&£~.(o
fiof
$"?V
syjt
ff.O
533
7a J
in
673
,
H.h
Ui
4-?-,?
/./h
L o.&>
6aJ
sy.o
syj
sy.7
515.0
It '
*9%
6tTV
6??
t, si
AY*
& 3. a
(>£&
&//
&o 7
id
*T,c>
S~6 (P
5*7-7
5*3.3
£*,3
lot
i>9-7
6?7
t>Vn
6*.?
La.a.
£.J!o
Sfc7
,f8 f
tfrs
539
•7/4.
703.
<>?3
Afo
(,7>
U
Ay.?
£/.?
&o.4>
sy/
&£
SST7
sy,q
7/&>
7° 7
7aA
A 9-3
h7R
a.7
13,2
{.j.sr
/P2,a
6>C> Qt
S~f£
f?'
3
5V5
1*3
7of
L%2
iro
£6. to
Ui
6sn
Li-7
bo-Z
srr
S7t
Si>7
4^3
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx^-xxxxxxxxxxxx:clx:
-------
Vehicle Data
TT73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
No- nnff Year Make
ilormal Idle -^Uf) 7) 1800 rpm Idle
Model Q„ul
Site oS , ja •
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
AMB W.5
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22,5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
*?/ f
rtf
fuTJ
^?y
5sa
,-rM
ra
773
y?o
^7
Vrf
5*51
sVir
,52 "?
5jo
r/a
5© "J
52)/
yy?
¦y?/
y?5
.ft 3
5V5
53, ¦V
55-0
sap
,
fV?
:pfc
?& /
$?y
57 0
50.7
5B0
f>a3
4o7
U-(o
&e>o
s-fn
5*7°
r) o
Ml
feM?
IdO 3.
0-7
S7.a
&>¦>
sy/r
s-y*
53 O
say
5"/3
r<>3
l<& T
5?. 5
52=f
57 .f
s?-3
57:7
.T3TO
sy?
53.;
5"^./
57/
ro.y
V77
4/ 3
i'?/
fT7r?
« A
fT5"
*Y/?
$ys
59 5"
530
5^5
ar/ ?
S"o,6
56) a
ns
W
5"T0
53.5
52 7
s* a
S~/.i
57 0
5o,0
sri
S7-4>
5Ti
svy
534
52--J"
ftg
57 3
50.(>
33.y
Too
v;7
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,OCXXXXXXXXX?'XXXXXXXXXXXXX}LX:
-------
Vehicle Data
Mo. ops' Year
Uormal Idle
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Prop,ran
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Make Model Crui.
1800 rpm Idle /"
Site
Sound Level Readings (dRA)
AM MM
Radius
Line 6 9
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
i
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
7i^
7',r)
(\ftiO
h7Q
Ar A
Wn
*3. if
£3^
isff
f>/ s
i 3
6fO
*//
fai
43. r
fa 3
4/. 7
io.q
•J>?
•r^
s~ti-6
«ri
hf?
67 7
(,70
(ft 0
f>
6(TI
W-7
4/7
^..¦r
n7
5^5
514
M
kf.i
M-l
<
Mb
kis
(>?.!
M 1
ttt
5^7
5y?.0
A77
A* if
^16 3
iff,7
kf.i
m
A<3*7
i/.y
^.7
F?.?
m
(>7,7
fcjn,?
47.0
A<>,7
if?.
65To
w
Ml
fax
&3 3
A/y
/ioC
5?ra
57.6
7C>
(7? 7
67.r
lS~9
4/a
13.x
(,3.0
V- 7
^/o
£<3.3
^TrV
5-4.?
.«,o
S?A
til
li i
Lb.*/
632
ln£. I
wf
he. 3
fT7,/
j"6.y
Hi
w
MS
h7f
/»<>. T
:XXy
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA)
open
Windows-open
37-y
closed
closed
closed
S"f. 1
Idle
lfinn
3/.V
414
-------
Vehicle Data
Mo. Q/-3 Year ,9-73
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Jormal Idle V*TA O
Mak* SVsfc
1800 rpm Idle
Model /3>-ou.
Site oti.M
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
4MB V3.1/ Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
?o.
ten
60.7
&ao
5W
,17,<
-rt?
,W-V
53?
SP><°
*¦&
lt-3
ST?
fir
r^-o
rv?
,T3.7
,52/
373
/?7
VZl
17. z
ui
W
,573
,-sxy
,5*5?/
w
51$
53?
S7.f
ffO.Q
W X
V6-7
rfA
srr
#7
55.0
,-r-o
iu
vm
y3.)
0
feo.3
r?,y
51.7
«0
,«T?
r/.7
5a ,f
Ao-lP
7
&-1
s?n
$73
f/. 1
So O
y^y
y<$?
y^?
kix
(si. 5
^3-V
T7V
XI,/
5"3.,f
53,?
5<5./
y^?
Vlro
lalA
5J?3
f2s?
-------
Vehicle Data
No. Q/.3 Year /yy.3
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Prop,ran
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
lloraal Idle
Make J±£tSL M°del ftfau
1800 rpm Idle y
Site o^.A .
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AM H3-7
Radius
Line
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112. S
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
7;f,7
7i,1
73.7
9j. 9
7'f
7/. a
?6-5
i,r.?
4Y7
£j.
hr,9
t>7.1
6Zi>
M7
6J-7
il9
lo.;r
(>19
i%0
w
t>7Z
Ui
L$7
US'
6/.V
??7
fri
sa
fw
697
hU
t>7-!p
U-7
4 £7
M9
t>iQ
<,3.3
(>&.!
Uh>
£6 <3
SVJ
ssy
67-3
£>£o
t>*/4
£>3y
&3.j
U4
sy,f
s*y
*13
Us
U'O
iS~ 3
W7
m
63. fT
Sf
La./
ui
srt
57. &
5? 3
ST./
0
67-9
A3- 0
fa 3
U!
&0.7
,T73
5T5
,w
tp.o
ny
iTJ
6X3
L7-3
a.7
is.i
tV.?
w>
A??
M-l
u-i
5?.t
S8*7
S7.i
syr
6K 9
L7- 5
U 9
U 1
4177
^.7
63,!
t/-7
S7.7
iW.L
6*7
t>71>
<,70
6S7&
U?>
4/.P
U 9-
s~xr
& 3
$ii
,5?-?
ft-S
&7<1
^.9
W7
tit
(,3.1
4) 3
lo.J
sr.j
57 J
SZ.3
&to
ss>x
Ui
**/?
^•0
L3 3
la.h
U7,
hO-7
59?
£*}&
S~7.5
sys
F3 6
5"/-3
(,7£
&£¦ S
d.7
Ml
rfj.-y
M.7
(.6.5
.57-^
37.6
sz {
Si3
w
h 9,1
6 W
(?72
6i>o
M7
tin
in
J7.7
SY.6
5~7,3
5i.l
w
t>8\!
t>7,3
k(e-(o
Hi
Lifi
ia.l
61.0
37,?
57?
sr.i
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxyjaxxxxxxxrxxxKyxxxxx?7{xxxxxxxxxxKx:ix:oLKxx
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
clospd
closed
53-1
Idle
18no
AMBIENT LEVEL (dHA) Windows-open 3^3 closed ^ ^
416
-------
TY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No- Year Make
Model .TJO
ilormal Idle tfoo
1800 rpm Idle
Site o9. ft
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AMB H5.i
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
ffl.l
,57.A
51.1
55,a
.5
5.1,5
.r 3 SL
,5^7
.ra.y
S/,!tr
i%x
^<5
17.5
bfl'h
l?,o
s/n
syp
53*7
5A0
57,-?
pr
iff
7
in
(>10
ji.7
5VA
j52L£
5"a 3
4%7
y*/
?#3
i0,l
(s/.O
,t
4"^5
y?b
Y*5
(sO.to
£>3./
UI
rtrd
irf-3
52,5
52.7
3~>?
37, /
50.7
y?-?
i?o
y^r
m
(,/?
tO-5
sw
5T6
SXo
*3.;}
flSfV
,r/-i
1 i-i
-/?.o
ixt
&},(?
5% J
sii
Sl.,a
isVf
53.^"
i2?o
su
5^>.;
ni
vz?
sr. i
st,.g
53~V
5Vf>
.W-d
5SL/
57. V
50-1
V?-7
/?,/
n,i
rn
s~7,a
57-1
57-0
5(> 3
rV?
SVrJ
5*3.7
S5.L
JS.o
5"/. 3
in
ill
5T5*
•S3"A
ry/
S3.1)
53^)
52) A
V7/
t>3 2
/La.i
ft*
X11
4Vfl
5H-in
55 3
.57 V
53.4
ft*
f,//
f>V3
l,n?>
fCl.c>
&>i
5V,?
53 o
^"/=?
Y$?
w
U>-!
,-fVV
57.o
fio-d-
57.=?
Jb.7
So J
*}>72
&5A
&.0
&}¦£>
57-tf
,-52.-5*
¦fV?
ft3l
.55°
¦57/
m
ten
U,H
M 3
{45
&*o
S?<9
5V.Z
51)
si?
&./
5-/3
fir
t*7
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>'XXXXXXXXXXXXX}LX:o:KXX
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open yy ^
open
closed
closed
Idle
18no
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open 9 closed ^ ^
417
-------
Vehicle Data
No. o/.-T Year j?73.
FY73 Emission factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
ilormal Idle
Make ^W-S Model f
s$v
5^5
?./
4S77
60./
,57 Z
,f*7
sis:/
¦*V4"
53 J
57.^
?
i%3
(r/s
&>.'}
3-73
377
5^y
55J
55?
S^Q
.13?-7
tr/y
5^
4.57/
6V?
fc>-\
S?,0
trwj
ss-.y
*¥¦?
5"#/
S3 %
S3£
SJ?
5a./
63J
6/3
6,3 3
{AO
57?
•sii
53~a
,r?,f
S3(n
ffaj
5"/A
???
n i
%&
63/
43 7
¦sirs
S7.7
tto
,52 3
&<*
Jo.?
Y? 3
(<0,7
in
5fc1
,177
tfr-o
-r*ry
¦rfto
,1?-?
.r/.y
y?7
fy.z
y?7
r?.$
&,o
,rz/
55?
si?
5*/J
,T?y
fj-f?
5&,f
no
?*5
nt
57.9
5K1
5?£
57?
5f?
X
fTZ?
s-7.1
SC.i
5*1
£T?f
5V;
S&7
¦r^y
r/=?
5b. s1
itL
for 7
(>? ^
bo ft
Or?
sy. 7
$70
Sfj
rv?
•sT/
T-97
r.?. /
S2 O
s/.y
sy/
5&C
(A!
i(.7.0
(,/a
•573
spy
fC7,/
tfXTf
s~y?
5"//
53/
53r-X
jy.t
5°-i
¦9? 3
fa*
AS#
A3 5
to?
57,#
,1* ft
tttS
jy^
^.7
jV
45? i
&7
So.^
y?.4>
Of
SJ.a
57;/
fTZ3
5^.y
5j<2
S-/6
SAO
fCt.G
<\7,5
0,7
U3
57?
xr-i
57-2
5kJ
asry
^3./
s&r
JZ.3
&7.a
6sr./
4,4.5
57.fr
54>.<)
5*^5
57
-------
Vehicle Data
No. oHp Year 79 7/
1*Q
FY73 Emission factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Make QLs,
iJormal Idle
1800 rpm Idle
Model
Sitec? . A-
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
hl.o
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
(o!-7*
S?/f
1?-3
1#f
w
S%5
519
5%o
sf*Y
tt-o
*11
S?/
Sac>
$73
in
m
f72
57 i
SM
57-X
56o
55i
sYh
Si J
,13?
5Z-x
S/.7
sz.i
n(r
yw
iro
ffiJ
5*7?
S7-0
rs?
5S,i
si*
fill
520
5'-1
Sod
ft/
m
?7.<*
17.6
h>0
ftf.2
r3f)
w!
&06
st.\o
377
ffc-1
55?
ss:/
5V.J
57*
5$5
S'-7
&.?
Sb.fi
nt
*>1?
5?8
57t>
si#
¦TSTl
$¥.?
sy.o
55-7
&¦/
5/-o
i/f.o
4$1
sy.&>
5X>1
574
51 ?
5i?
53-7
5*'*
•55-0
^s?
i?7
fotr
1/5
4M
&.1
5*V
57,6
&> ?
S3 a
53:=?
5i, 7
51,/
#.y
51L
,r/9
.57. c
2£>
(fO?>
S?5
f\W
?7,1
5H
5fa
5,1-5
fan
5A1
So.&
l?-ir
&(<*/
6/.f
6a.?
5? a
o'll
5?o
sr. ?
51,4
5b.$
S3,!
Sa.(
61.1
{Pl,il
Yft
HI
US
iS-K
Uo
*ii
rtir
^,3
syj
syj
&3
&7
5a?
&Q.0
V9J
Iva.
i?-7
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>r70(XXXXXXXXXV:{}L,COLXX>'
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
closed
closed
Idle
1800
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open ^ closed ^^
419
-------
TY73 Enission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No- Q/L> Year /??/
iformal Idle
Make C,H£ Y
1800 rptn Idle
Model KIA/G
Site
5./?.
Sound Level Readings (dRA)
AMS %.0
Radius
Line 6
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
?a.x
If-7!
%-1
7V.5
U{,
71.9
7/. J
7d.O
W-H
MM
LL9
65,7
61/
Ll.3
60. X
HA
7*7.7
p.L
7/9
7o,/
6?'3
tf.i
6-5,0
MX
63.6
63.a
6U
!o j.o
15.3
75.0
13.5
71. /
7a, o
H.9
LU
67.3
u.i
L5.L
61.9
63,?
L3,0
m
67.3
m
73.0
7a.9
7o J
LU
LI 3
LU
U.1
Li.7
US
63.9
63,/
tlf
UX
U.o
n.L
73,5
73,3
71.0
7a. 3
1*7.9
L7.X
66.3
ts.i
M.L
Lt!
L3.X
Ml
LU
UX
5H
7a, y
731.)
la,3
69. f
117
nt,
L6.3
L$.1
61.3
43.8
Hi?
6x.x
U3
(,0.0
59.1
LM
i>7,f
kU
LU
L5.S
M.9
Mo
63.*7
4,3.7
L>.9
60.2
59.9
5?.0
59.2
far
t>9.3
(oL.O
15,3
Hi
L3.X
L2.L
12,o
U1
U.7
59,?
59, o
58.7
57.5
L?.g
L9.X
L7.5
iU
ts.i
Lfi
63.7
63.1
i2,3
Lh $
il.o
66.0
59.3
51.9
57,3
%x
76.1
1,8.1
lol.l
&L.5
15.3
MX
L3.6,
6X9
&1.3
LKL
Uo
U.f
59.3
5?./
m
71.3
11.7
m
&9.H
u».i
let.5
!fL.7
U.I
LS.1
UX
L3J
63.0
59.9
5%0
y. 3
75.2
13.3
7),H
7a.&
Ic9.i
4?.7
67,3
u.s
L5.9
&& 0
61./
63.1
L*A
59.9
59,3
71.5
nx
13.?
124
7a.\J
it.9
67,7
7,7a
LU
L5.S
LI,3
L3.5
Li.i
L7.X
Li.3
69.5
7/.?
75.3
7*1
73.X
71.)
7a,?
L9.1
lu
1,1,1
U.3
L5.§
U?
1,3.7
1,3.6
LI.9
U.9
75.3
7U
73.1
7a.9
L9.L
LU
L7.o
LL.3
L5.7
65. o
LI./
63.x
UM
Ll.X
77.1
12.L
15.9
7*7.0
n.s
7a.9
m
U.3
L7.5
U.7
L5.S
L1.9
Li 7
L3.1
U.7
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^OCXX'vXXXXX^UQCXXXXXXXXXZCL'Cx >;w
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
AMBIENT LEVEL (dIJA) Windows-open [J^TJ
closed
closed
closed
teO, 3
Idle
1800
*9,3
420
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Progran
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. Q/9 Year /
Uormal Idle SOO
Make VoLh(
1800 rpm Idle
Model
5BV/}
Site S.A.
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AMQ H3.1
Radius
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Line
(Deg9)
0.0
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
48
60
72
84
96
U1
52.7
52.3
54.9
5i.V
55.5
55 J
51. /
53.1
52.0
So. 3
92. /
22.5
U!
U.3
S9.9
Stt
St.?
57./
54.3
55.1
51.5
53.6
5/.S
99.9
1?.?
45.0
4,0.9
1,0.0
59.1
59.9
51.8
S7.3
54,5
5S.1
Si. 7
53.5
52.1
51.3
99.2
9?.o
67.5
M.3
U.I
4>0.1
59.7
59*0
52.5
5 V.?
54,3
55.7
54.?
53.Z
53.0
51.1
51.3
5o.1
99,9
90.0
i3.2
M.o
a 3
U.7
Lo.o
59.2
52.9
57.1
5i.3
55, to
51./
52.3
50,9
H9.2
Ml
112.5
i3.7
UH.3
i3.9
UJ
(,6.1
59. J
58.4,
57.5
54, f
51,7
53.1
52.1
99,9
9?, I
135.0
U.7
L5.2
U9
lel.O
13*
UH
W
k>.3
59.1
JU
5i.7
55, V
53.9
S/'lo
9?.b
157.5
tf.2.
V1.j
U.S
1,5.)
U3
42.6
1,0.3
59,1
517
SL1
51.?
53.L
52.1
5). 5
m
180.0
71,2
U.S
7o.1
L2'0
U.S
Mi
U9
4/.1
59.7
52.5
57.2
54.1
55.3
53.1
5). 9
202.5
76.3
U9.4
L9.o
ill
45.1
4U
47*
4,6.3
St.)
57.3
SL1
51,2
53.2
S/.2
99.3
225.0
a>.y
£>9.3
VM
U.L
iS.2
43.1
ill
U)
59,3
5*7.2
SL.t
51.1
52.7
50.3
m
247.5
U.1
tu
U.7
1,5.9
1,1.9
(,3,5
U7
4>0.3
59,?
57,9
55.3
St.!
52,1
5a. 5
m
270.0
UJ
(*5.3
l»1.h
Ml
t>2.9
U.7
Uo
5%9
52.5
57.9
54.3
55.0
53.1
51.1
W.7
97,1
292.5
U3
UF
un
59, a
59.1
54.3
51,7
53.2
517
n?
m
315.0
U.S
4,6.9
59.!
57.2
Si. 3
55.1
53.1
52.1
51.1
19.7
17,1
337.5
u,
-------
"PY73 Emission Vector Testing Prop,ran
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. 0/9 Year Z4&9
Uormal Idle
Make VolK
Model
S£DA
1800 rpm Idle
Site £./).
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
am m
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line
(Degs)
0.0
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
48
60
72
84
96
hh.S
U.*
LS.1
MS
L3.9
11.1
U.9
U.o
ld.2
59.3
51.1
54,9
53.1
5>.$
tu
22.5
&5.0
LS.1
m
M3
u.y
i>J.5
u.l
5M
5L.3
55.9
53.7
5/.i>
VU
45.0
wr
M.l
U.3
IcS.I
Ml
L2.1
ieOS
5%H
51.1
Si.l
51.3
53,1
51. V
19,L
67.5
Vf.3
w.i
U.J
65.$
U3
13.1
io.t
52.9
Sl.5
51.3
5A?
19,7
1 u
1L.\
90.0
11.1
71,L
7a?
t%9
LS.1
U.3
leL.t
M,S
U.l
U.l
59.1
57,8
55. 1
51.1
S/.f
W,3
112.5
71.7
13.3
13,1
%3.9
L3.3
U2.5
Ub.t
59,3
57,1
55,1
202.5
nr
1U
13.9
7/,?
69.9
£>U
bit.5
1*5.3
Ml
U2.1
U.9
58,8
56.7
5*2
53./
225.0
75.9
75.3
73.2
UH
7o.3
1*1.9
hit >2
Ml
£3.9
UJ
St.
5l>4
51/
52.3
247.5
7u
73,3
73.8
W
76,1b
LM
M-1
U.l
M.9
L4.o
62.2
U.3
59.1
57,9
55.3
53,1
270.0
49,9
71.1
lo.L
m
U.3
U.I
L5.t>
L3.7
m
U.3
U.l
59,8
SL.f
S1.3
5X&
So.)
292.5
t9.>
toU
it*
U.1
1>5.3
M.I
L3J
U.3
59.5
573
55.1
53.X
Si. 7
IS, 9
m
315.0
At3
U.V
15.1
M-1
L33
U5
S9.H
59, L
51.9
55.7
53. J
Shi
49.5
vm
337.5
L5.S
USJ
U3
USA
U.f
M
59,1
SU
5L.3
51.2
£3.7
5J.?
m
M.9
m
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXyXXXXXXXXX^^XXXXXXXXXyX'CLT'MXXy
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
£,S.9
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open 3fi5
closed
closed
closed 23.3
L3,9
Idle
I8nn
422
-------
Vehicle Data
No. QSj} Year 1919,
ilormal Idle d>o(5
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Make AMM O Model HoR#
1800 rpm Idle
Site S.A.
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AMB 43.!
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line
(Degs)
0.0
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
48
60
72
84
96
hi,1}
£>5.3
Ul,
59.2
51,1
St.f
5U
55.X
54.4
53.5
5J.t>
49.ii
41,2
4i,5
22.5
ied.L
U1
5?.i
5U
55, 4
54.3
53.2
S3j
52,1
51S
H9.L
41,9
4Li
41.7
45.0
59.3
id. 5
511
57.4
5U
5s, y
54.9
54.\2
53.5
53.o
5), 9
5A.I,
49.1
W,3
67.5
51.2
59.9
59.0
ft#
57.4
5L.1
55:9
55J
S4.3
52.lo
52.5
5J.1
So.}
no
412
90.0
SI. 5
U>.3
lob.1}
5y,t
57,%
5L.9
51.2
55.L
54,9
54,3
53,2
5J,$
V8.9
112.5
58,H
leO.3
letiZ
59,2
57,f
57.)
5U
55.9
55.2
54,7
53.3
52.1
5o.t>
135.0
5S,o
5?.y
5U
51,a
5L.3
55M
54.9
54,5
54,2
53,i,
52.5
So,3
4% 7
157.5
55,4
57.5
5L.2
55, V
54.1
54.)
53.3
52.1
So:9
49.b
411
180.0
SI. 1
5%i
5L9
SiA
H.I
55,a
S4.i
53.9
53.2
54.1
52. a
5/.i
H9.7
*9.6
202.5
5Lt
57,3
Si.5
56.0
55.4
54.2
54,2
53.5
52,5
5U
5d. 3
49.4
mi
225.0
57, y
51,1
57.1
5L3
ss.i
54.1
53J
52.)
56 A
m>
W
247.5
si.h
5%9
51.2
5t.5
57.3
5LI
55.y
54.3
53.1
51.2
5 ),7
5o.H
VU
411
270.0
5f.t>
Ub.L
59.1
5?/
51,3
51,4
55.2
53.9
52.L
51,5
5o,f
m
411
292.5
5t.H
U.I
59,?
59.0
51.9
Slo.?
55J
54.2
53.5
52.H
51.0
419
315.0
U1
U.5
U1
59.3
58,4
5LM
55.1
54.1
52.9
52.0
So.1
50.1
4U
337.5
L3.L
Ml
IAS
U.S
52.1
5i.9
5La
554
54J
53A
52.9
SJ.3
50.4
49.1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^XCXXXXXXXXXXTCLXrO-JW
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
52.4
closed
closed
51?
Idle
180(1
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open y/ y closed
423
-------
FY73 Emission Vector Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. pa/ Year /fttA Make AMMO Model HORtf
iJormal Idle
1800 rpm Idle
Site
S,/?,
Sound Level Readings (dRA)
Am V3./
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Radius
Line
(Degs)
0.0
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
48
60
72
84
96
%b.Q
tt.1
?3.i
&.y
11.3
%A
15.1
Ho
72.9
12.3
u.i
lad
L9.&,
L?,3
M.L
22.5
$5.5
U3
Uf
12.0
%,5
11,9
13.1
12.2
Id.9
ai
U.9
&,sA
Lf.3
U3.1
M.2
45.0
U!
m
%D.O
%.9
nt
11,9
103
Lff.1
ML
LL.5
t>5.3
MS
Ml
LU
15. J
67.5
1L9
iu
m
1M
If.V
13.1
«./
m
m
ioL.i
6,5.1
LU
L3.5
U9
U.A
90.0
75. f
113
1L.3
m
11.9
1,9.5
MA
lfib.3
w?
ta.i
us
(edA
s?,t
5$, y
57,5
56,3
112.5
%,!
m
IL.o
m
13.1
n.x
DA
1&.L
M.I
MS
Lis
U.)
k5,0
M.s
L3.I
U,6
135.0
13.5
ISA
ns
13.2
ii,?
%.y
6,9J
&X.3
li.i
U.S
L3.X
LJ.A
IfiO.O
59.1
S8,1
157.5
fr.x
12,9
n.i
72 a
7/3
1D.5
1*9.1
MX
UA
L3,l
LU
59,7
58.1
5L.I
55.2
180.0
1i>.U
IM
Id.S'
w
L%.3
t*7M
U.1
1,3.)
L3.9
U.a
£9.t
S74
56.5
53,1
202.5
l»9.o
no,
m
m
nx
7d.&>
L9.I
MA
MM
L5.i
6,3.9
LI it
52.1
51.1
225.0
Us
Is. 3
1U
73.5
12.2
HA
&.5
L9.I
m
Ml
L33
us
59.9
5t. 3
57./
247.5
1U
11A
15.3
Ho
13,1
12,L
7 1.3
1&.0
19./
M.3
M.I
lo5.2
M.I
Ll.1
U>.1
5f,J
270.0
%A
71.L
%.to
7u
72,3
HA
Id A
m
M.I
U1.S
65.3
L3.9
U1
6>6, /
5U
57,1
292.5
m
11.1
17. f
%,i
IVA
119
7lo
1/.3
16.1
L9.I
M.3
L5,9
Ml
LZ.o
1,2.2
U.3
315.0
113
W
19.1
ILl
15,9
IS, 6
w
13.3
UJ
1/./
Id,3
m
M.2
U.3
M9
337.5
95,0
9S.U
S/,5
19.3
1U
75,1
1H.3
13.5
73.1
1),S
io9,5
MA
M.I
LL.0
M.I
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?,xxxxxxxxxxxx:cix:<>:',cor
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open closed|
open
39,y
closed
5S-.3
Idle
18O0
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA)
Windows-open closed ^2 /
424
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No* Q^5 Year / Make OLOS
formal Idle 7&Q 1800 rpm Idle
Model
Site S.A.
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
Sound Level Readings (dBA)
AM
Radius
Line 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157,5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
U1
59,2
59,2
58-1
57.)
5L3
55./
53.9
5X7
5/.3
53.3
51./
55.1
54.9
5M
53./
5X3
5o.g
H9.1
1U
59.1
58,1
514
5i.5
55. i
5*3
5X7
5/.1
56.6
59,3
579
57, /
5L.3
55.f
53.9
53.1
5X.7
5/.1
Sa.L
59,f
58, i>
51.3
51./
St,9
5X3
5).L>
5b,y
519
57,f
5L.7
55.9
51./
5X1
5/.1
5a. 3
U.7
L3.1
U-1
16, £
St.7
5L3
51.9
53,2
5X9
56.2
M
UX.i>
U3
Ld.o
59,3
5?J
5U
55.}
53.1
s/,8
loXi
U3
y.7
/(&,$
5t,9
Si. 1
51&
51.9
5XJ
50.3
63,1
&>3,1
&!¦!
U.3
59,f
58.1
5L2
St, 3
53.5
5XJ
56.7
&X,h
L3.C
16.7
59,1
59,1
5U
51.3
5X9
5).?
56.1
5S.5
39,9
U!
hd.1
59,f
57.3
$5.9
55.0
53,1
5/,9
W
U>.o
59.?
5U
57.$
si.f
55.9
5V,f
53.)
5).?
56.)
59,/
U-1
tod.a
5?,7
57.0
55,8
51./
534
si,?
56.1
U>.5
U/
U.?
59,?
5?,3
57.1
5L5
54,3
5X,Z
5/.1
V?,9
5
(,3.1
U9
U.3
S?A
57,S
5U
54.7
53.3,
5A?
5a. /
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^OOOCXyXXXX^C^OTCXXXXXX^IXX^LXrOIXXy
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
SV.f
53.V
open
AMBIENT LEVEL (dBA) Windows-open [^9
closed
closed
closed 3
Idle
lflon
425
-------
FY73 Emission Vector Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. Q3L.5 Year
ilormal Idle
Make OLD*
1800 rpm Idle
Model
Site
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
AtiB 4L.X
Radius
Line 6
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
m
%.3
19.3
13.1
7/V
10.3,
*9.1
y$.i
u.%
Ms
*19
59.1
57.3
55.)
111
79.3
111
11.5
is.o
i9J
*1.1
*b. 1
1,5.1
Ml
ill
*D,*
52.7
51.9
55.2
Id.O
7/. 3
7i.1
*19
1,1.)
ti,4
i5.3
*9.1
i3.0
*1.1
id.f
58*f
5&.b
55.)
53.2
i%t
m
L9.7
m
IpB-2
l/tftO
*5.9
63.9
*17
U3
*M
5?,/
Si.O
5VJ
53.3
5 /./
U.3
mi
t>9.1
m
67.5
*5.2
*9.9
M.a
*2.9
Id.7
U,*
5g.y
5L2
59.5
52.%
50.5
1,5.3
M.I
ai
MA
u.i
iS.9
IpU
*3.2
*3.o
US
*o.1
59.%
59.0
57.9
5U
59.%
LU
*9.2
*7.9
**.1
iSJ
M.i
*1,9
at
*1.3
*dH
52M
5U
51.*
52.1
5/.S
7*4
Id.O
m
1,5.5
M.3
m
ilo
UJ
*0.7
59.2
57.1
55.1
53.1
51.7
H9.1
Vl.1
10.1,
m
L5.t>
*1.3
*3.1
*!.*
U.I
59.9
S?.d
su
55.X
511
52.3
5o.t
*7.3
*7.1
U.I
*5.3
*1.1
1*3.1
*24
*1.7
*O.Z
59.3
5W
55,7
53.1
52.1
5o.3
M.9
Ml
Ue.L
*5.3
M.L
1*3.3
*2.1
Us
*6-2
59,i
57./
55.7
53./
51, f
99.2
leS.Lf
w
U.I
U.I
*5.5
*5.3
Ml
U1
U3
59.7
5S.1
55.9
53.3
5his
99.2
m
i5.7
U1.1
*1.5
U.9
{=5.1
Hi
£3.*
U9
*0.5
59.1
52.3
55.1
53.1
5>.5
m
mi
ill
t>u
m
ill
*1.3
U.I
L5.)
*1.3
13 J
iS3
U.3
581
Si.j
54.1
5J.X
M
l/.f
7u
u.1
is±
MA
U9
*/.7
U.s
Sl.f
55.9
51.9
50.3
w
IIS
w
11.9
*9.5
*1.1
Hi
15.1
M.t
*3.1
Ui
59.1
51.2
55.9
53.2
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXyvXXXXXXXXX^OCXXXXXXXXX^^OOCXXXXXXXyXXJLTOLW
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
AMBIENT LEVEL (dllA) Windows-open r^TJ
clospd
closed
closed
59.9
Idle
1800
39.3
426
-------
Vehicle Data
No. 077 Year /911]
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Program
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
ilormal Idle
Make C V
1800 rpm Idle
Model \J£&//
Site Sj.
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
Radius
Line 6
(Degs)
0.0
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
U.1
MM
m
U3
Zed./
52.1
51.1
5Li
56.2
55.1
51.1
52.1
51.3
19.?
!»1.X
L1,t
US
U2
U>.5
51. L
519
51.1
SL1
56 Jt
51.0
53.1
5/. 5
5a./
"U
A3.i
U.I
U2
U.3L
U.L
59.1
52.6
51.1
56.1
5L.2
S5.Z
51.5
53M
53.0
50,1
W.1
1*2.5
U9
6>0.9
59.8
5U
51.7
5LL
5C.6
55.4
51.9
51.3
53.5
52.3
5o.1
n1
17.2
loHM
US
59.%
511
sin
5L9
55.1
55.)
51.1
51.C
53.5
SZ.to
53.6
50.9
19,/
HU
U1
a 3
59.6
58.5
51.2
57.1
5U.3
55.5
55. <3
511
53.5
53,V
5J.I
5o.1
19,5
HIX
su
59.3
52.Z
57.5
57.0
56.3
55.9
511
51.3
53.2
Slto
5 1,9
H9.7
115
18.1
5L3,
54-ir
55.?
55.4
54.9
5 1.1
53.6
53.1
Si..?
52.3
51.1
56.5
19.3
mi
W.6
5i>.1
5L9
5L.3
55. V
51.9
51.5
53. L
53. 2
52.5
53.!
5a.?
5o,6
19.2
vr.7
17.6
511
58.9
S2.il
51.1
SL.2
SL.L
55.1
S5.A
51.1
5V.o
52.2
52.1
St. 2
5o.i>
t?.7
US
£>0.1
59.7
52.)
51.5
56.9
56.3
55.1
SS.O
51.1
53.%
52A
5/. 3
504
1?.f
U5
US
U.2
59.X
58J
51.1
51,2
51.2
551
55.Q
5*6
53.1
5 IS
50.6
1U
V3/
&?,3
uv
59.9
52.7
5?,/
51.3
56.7
5L!
55.6
55.0
51.1
52.9
St. 3
19.7
19.3
It.5
U9
U!
U1
60.J
59.3
St,/
57.5
56.9
56./
55.3,
51.5
53.0
51.1
5o.1
19.6
12.1
13.4
Ml
LU
L2,1
US
51.9
52.1
51.5
51.1
554
SIX
53.0
53.1
5).1
19.9
19./
Ml
63.5
U1
u.\
59.1
51.1
56.9
5L3
55.?
55.1
51.3
53.5
52.1
5oM
19.1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTQCXXXXXXXXX?rXXXXXXXXXX>:x:CL,C\X\X>'
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
55./
open
closed
closed
53.6
Idle
1800
AMBIENT LEVEL (dHA) Windows-open V5. F closed
427
-------
FY73 Emission Factor Testing Prop,ram
Sound Level Testing
Decibel Contour Data Sheet
Vehicle Data
No. Q7 V Year /? f V Make CH&V
•lormal Idle 1800 rpm Idle
Model
I/£GA
Site £./}.
Sound Level Readings (dHA)
AM 8 W.X
Radius
Line 6 9
(Degs)
0.0
22.5
45.0
67.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
157.5
180.0
202.5
225.0
247.5
270.0
292.5
315.0
337.5
Distance from Center of Vehicle (feet)
12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 48 60 72 84 96
m
Hi
111
16.6
69.x
68.3
vu
U.I
653
ML
6X1
6J.o
59,%
57.5
56. %
75.1
nx
11.3
1/.C
m
66.3
65,1
64.s
64.0
U2
60.5
59.4
51.X
56.5
u?
yj.5
13.1
1U
a?
610
Up,1!
65.3
64.6
63,9
63. t
LU
59.6
58,4
56.1
55. V
M
fU
10.9
69,6
w
66.9
65.1
64,6
63,4
6XX
62,i
59,8
5$,3
51.0
54.6,
S3.2
69,1
6$.b
66.3
64.9
6,3$
63jO
6Q.0
U3
60,5
59.2
51.1
56.i
55.3
53.)
53.3
Ms
M,L>
663
U 5.1
L5.I
U3
L 3.1
6X.4
as
U!
sr.9
51,5
56.3
5V.0
53.3
in
67.6
61.1
U.4
61,5
63.8
63.X
til
Ll.t)
61.5
59.X
51.1
564
59.0
53.1
a 9
m
Mm
L3.H
UU
6X3
lt> Lb
6./.X
60, is
6a. j
58.0
56.1
55,6
53.4
SIX
64. 3
65.X
1,3.8
6X3
62.1
61.0
d>A.I
59,V
59.X
58.3
56.0
54.5
53.X
56.8
5o.a
4V.9
65,4
654
64.5
63.8
63.0
6X.1
US
60,9
6fl,o
51%
SU
554
52.9
5XA
61.X
M
1*1.1
66.%
&>5A>
64.9
63.6
63./
M
U6
59.5
SIX
51.1
5V.9
54.3
U3
W
70.3
614
u.f
65.7
64.1
64.0
633
US
59.1
58.X
51.0
54,1
54.0
6tX
llo
m
6U
65.9
65.0
63.7
6lo
&2.h>
bl.6
ui
59.3
58/)
5L,9
51.1
54,/
11,2
m
11,5
IV
67.4
15,3
totf,)
43.1
4X3
615
&>0.1
58,4
56.1
55.6
53.X
52.4
HX
13.9
%5
v&,y
LI,I
66 A
1)5,3
63.1
U9
U4
59.X
51.X
56.6
54.3
531
m
16.7
73.9
71.0
611
6U
66.0
65, X
M3
63.1
U!
59,6
58,J
55.9
55.1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^XXXXXXXXXX^'XXXXXXXXXXX'CCL'COIXXX
Interior Levels (dBA): Windows-open
open
U.I
AMBIENT LEVEL (dHA) Windows-open
closed
closed
closed
64.3
Idle
18no
428
-------
APPENDIX J
TEST FUEL :
[NSPECTION
REPORTS
TEST NOS.
SITE (INCLUSIVE)
RVP
H/C IBP
5*
10%
15%
20*
30%
407
50%
907 FBP
Denver D001-D073
9.3
2.20 83
115
131
140
155
176
199
224
320
321
D074-D114
9.1
2.10 86
121
133
139
160
186
205
250
360
362
D115-D259
8.6
2.00 88
124
136
150
155
183
206
235
369
370
(except evap)
Houston H001-H025
11.0
1.74 83
119
133
144
157
184
208
230
323
324
H026-H090
10.4
1.72 86
123
139
150
163
186
216
241
359
360
H091-H202
10.0
1.78 87
120
136
148
162
187
214
240
370
370
Detroit M001-M086
9.5
1.77 87
122
137
149
160
183
210
235
370
370
M087-M190
9.6
1.83 88
124
137
149
158
183
208
232
368
372
429
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1 REPORT NO 2
EPA-460/3-74-015
3 RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO
4 TITLE ANO SUBTITLE
A Study of Emissions from 1967-1974 Light-Duty Vehicles
in Denver, Houston, and Detroit
5 REPORT DATE
(Vtnhf>v 1 Q7/|
6 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHOR(S)
D. R. Liljedahl and J. L. Terry
8 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
19900 E. Colfax Ave.
Aurora, Colorado 80011
10 PROGRAM ELEMENT NO
11 CONTRACT/GRANT NO
68-03-0388
12 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13 TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14 SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16 ABSTRACT
A laboratory emissions study was conducted on a sample of 1967-1974 model-
year vehicles operating in Denver, Houston and Detroit. Emissions from 540 vehicles,
180 from each city, were investigated. Sound level tests were also performed on 85
vehicles from the San Antonio area.
Exhaust emission test were performed on each vehicle in the as-received con-
dition using the 1975 Federal Test Procedure. Evaporative emission tests were per-
formed on 20 1973 model-year vehicles in the Denver area using the canister collection
procedure of the Federal Register and the SHED testing techniques of SAE J 171. A
variety of additional exhaust emission tests were also performed. Modal emissions data
were developed from 75 of the 1972, 1973 and 1974 model-year vehicles in each site
using Surveillance Driving Sequence and steady state testing procedures. Emissions
from air conditioned vehicles were investigated in Houston and Detroit using a sequence
and steady state testing procedures. Emissions from air conditioned vehicles were in-
vestigated in Houston and Detroit using a sequence of 4 modified FTP hot start tests.
Emissions from loaded vehicles and vehicles towing trailers were also investigated
using Surveillance Driving Sequence and steady state testing procedures. Sound level
tests were performed at the wide open throttle test condition in accordance with the
SAE J986a procedure and at the 5 operating conditions of the EPA Use Cycle Modes.
Additional tests were conducted for use in sound level contour development.
17 KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a DESCRIPTORS
b IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c COSATt Held/Group
18 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19 SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
21 NO OF PAGES
438
20 SECURITY CLASS (This page)
UNCLASSIFIED
22 PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
430
------- |