vvEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA 453/N-93-012
April 1993
Control
T echnology NEWS
Center
Volume 5. No. 2
A JOINT EPA / STAPPA / ALAPCO PROJECT
April 1993
ACT FOR BAKERY OVEN
EMISSIONS
By Martha Smith
	CPB/ESD/OAQPS	
The EPA's "Alternative Control
Technology Document for Bakery Oven
Emissions" (EPA 453/R-92-017) was
completed this winter by the Chemicals
and Petroleum Branch, Emission Stan-
dards Division, OAQPS. This ACT
document was developed in response
to a request by the industry to provide a
more uniform information base for use
by regulatory agencies and the industry
when considering VOC control require-
ments.
The information in this document
pertains to bakeries that produce bread,
rolls, buns, and similar products, but not
those that produce crackers, pretzels,
sweet goods, or baked foodstuffs that
are not yeast-leav-
ened. There are about
600 large commercial
bakeries in the United
States and most are lo-
cated near population
centers. About 23 ov-
ens nationally have in-
stalled emission con-
trol devices, primarily
to respond to RACT,
BACT or LAER re-
quirements.
The ACT docu-
ment provides infor-
mation on the baking
process, potential
emissions from bak-
ing, and potential
emission control options. The primary
VOC emitted is ethanol; however, small
amounts of other alcohols, esters and
aldehydes are also produced in the bak-
ing process as the yeast ferments.
Oost of VOC Removal (S/ton)
_L_
I
_L_
Oven Heat Input (Btu/hr)
	 4.4 lb VOC/ton bread		<>	7.0 lb VOC/ton bread
	5.4 lb VOC/ton bread
Figure 1 - Cost Effectiveness of Catalytic Oxidation on
Bakery Ovens
Yeast fermentation of 100 lbs of sugar
produces 47 lbs of C02,49 lbs of etha-
nol, and 4 lbs of glycerol, organic acids,
and various minor compounds. Based
Jcontinued page 2)
AIRWA VES
By Bob Blaszczak
CTC Co-Chair, OAQPS
Well it's April 1 and I'm writing the last article for the April
edition of the CTC NEWS. I guess we have a shot at getting
this edition out on time (i.e., in April). We're adapting to new
procedures and using a new printing contract that has a quick
turnaround. Do you think it's a coincidence that it's April 1 and
I'm getting this optimistic line from my staff?
As usual the January edition of the CTC NEWS with a
CTC product order form has spawned many requests for CTC
documents, software, etc. Based on our experience in
previous years, we have tried to bolster our inventories to
meet the crunch; however, some delays are inevitable, so
please be patient. We've also noticed very few requests for
everything on the list or multiple copies of things. Thank you
for requesting just what you need! That helps a lot.
This years' CTC budget for projects is a lot less than those
of previous years, but we still have enough resources to
handle a few good projects. If you have a specific need for
CTC engineering assistance or would like to have technical
guidance on a particular source type or control technology,
call the HOTLINE or leave a suggestion on the CTC BBS. But
don't wait too long. Once summer rolls around things will get
very tight.
We've been getting a lot of requests for the status/
schedule for CTG's, ACT's, and MACT standards. One caller
suggested that we include this kind of information in the CTC
NEWS. Another thought would be to make it available on the
CTC BBS as a read/downloadable item. We're looking into
the possibility of doing one or both of these. You should be
aware that most scheduled proposals/promulgations for the
January-March time frame were not met. Some technical
problems along with the change in administration (i.e., new
people at EPA Headquarters and OMB) are contributing
factors. If you have any ideas or opinions on making this kind
of information available through the CTC, please let us know.
(continued page 2)

-------
ACT FOR BAKERY
(continued from page 1)
on recently gathered emission data, the
ACT provides a predictive equation for
total VOC emissions. This equation for
VOC emissions will be used in the next
revision to AP-42.
The ACT presents an excellent
overview of typical baking processes,
equipment, operating parameters,
emission sources, emission stream
characteristics, emission estimates,
techniques for determining emissions
and regulations currently affecting VOC
emissions from bakeries. The docu-
ment also evaluates the following emis-
sion control techniques: various oxida-
tion/incineration techniques: carbon
adsorption; scrubbing; condensation;
biofiltration; and process and formula-
tion changes. Catalytic and regenera-
tive oxidation were determined to be
technically feasible options that could
achieve a 98% destruction efficiency.
However, catalytic oxidation was deter-
mined to be more cost effective. See
Figures 1 and 2 for plots of cost effec-
tiveness ($/ton VOC removed) vs. oven
heat input for catalytic and regenerative
oxidation, respectively.
The ACT document is extremely
useful in gaining a comprehensive un-
derstanding of the baking industry, esti-
mating a facility's emissions, identifying
emission points to consider for control,
and determining which control devices
have demonstrated acceptable cost
and emission reduction. Government
agencies can get a free copy by calling
the CTC HOTLINE. Others can order it
through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service (NTIS) by calling (800) 553-
6847. The NTIS document number is
PB93-157618.
HQ
AIRWA VES
(continued from page 1)
I attended a New Source Review
Simplification Workshop in March.
There was a lot of interest in the RACT/
BACT/LAER Clearinghouse, especially
its data base, BUS. Most attendees
were not aware of the many improve-
ments to BUS that have been made
over the last year or ongoing efforts to
make it better. Three of the major new
improvements underway are: improved
data (more complete and better qual-
ity); statistical ranking of determinations
for specific processes based on con-
trolled emission rate; and a regulation
data base (summaries of all EPA emis-
sion standards and provisions for State
and local agencies to include summa-
ries of selected rules at their discretion).
We need your constructive criticism on
the Clearinghouse. Please let us know
what you think of the current system and
planned im-
provements ,
and how we can
make it better.
Most of all we
need yourdeter-
m i n a t i o n s .
Please call the
HOTLINE and
ask for Joe or
Bob to share
your thoughts or
if you need help
accessing/us-
ing the Clearing-
house.
Have a good
day!
yg
SEARCHING
THE RBLC:
TRICKS OF THE TRADE
By Joe Steigerwald
OAQPS/EPA
Doing a search on the BLIS data-
base does not require a lot of mystical
mumbo-jumbo. It does, however, in-
volve dead chickens and dried eye of
newt (just kidding!). All it requires is a
little knowledge of how the system is
structured and a little common sense.
Just sign into the OAQPS TTN, select
BLIS from the main menu, and select
the BLIS Database option in the lower
left hand corner of the screen. Choose
the Query option and the database that
you want to search and you're ready to
go.
The first thing to remember is that
all of the data in the BLIS database are
broken down into three levels: facility;
process; and pollutant. The facility level
data are not used much in searching
unless you're looking for a certain com-
pany, or data from a specific EPA Re-
gion, State, or agency. The most useful
data are at the process level and that's
the level that I'll discuss today.
The primary items that will be
searched at the process level are the
Process Type Code (PTC) and the Pro-
cess Name. If you know the PTC for the
process you're interested in, you're
golden! Just be sure to search all three
databases - Historical, Current, and
Transient - if you're having trouble find-
ing anything. However, if you are un-
sure of what the PTC is, a complete list
of PTCs are available for downloading
in the Downloading Software section of
the BLIS BBS and an interactive listing
is available from the HELP function
within the database portion of BLIS. (To
use the interactive listing hit the F1 key
from the screen that requests the actual
value of the PTC and select 'R' for a
listing of the major PTCs. Select the
one you're interested in and a detailed
list of PTCs appears.)
The other item commonly searched
at the process level is the Process
Name. The best advice here is to use
(continued page 3)
Cost of VOC Removal ($/ton)





\


S\\


¦v


	





	


2M 4M 6M IM I0M
Oven Heat Input (Btu/hr)
	 4.4 lb VOC/ton bread 	°"	7.0 lb VOC/ton bread
	5.4 lb VOC/ton bread
Figure 2 - Cost Effectiveness of Regenerative Oxidation on
Bakery Ovens
Recycled/Recyclable
Printed wMh Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
0<£y contains at least 50% recycled fiber
CTC News page 2

-------
SEARCHING THE
RBLC
(continued from page 2)
the CONTAINS (word search) clause
as the operator and keep the string that
you're looking for unique to the process
and keep it short. This is good advice
whenever you're doing a word search in
BLIS, whether it be on the Facility
Name, the Process Name, the Control
Equipment, or Process Modification
field. For example, if you are looking for
an incinerator, try searching on the
string INCIN. This will find incinerator,
incineration, or the abbreviation incin.
without having to do three separate
searches. If you need a specific fuel
type or a general piece of equipment
with specific characteristics, try search-
ing on a short, general string first then
move towards more specific short
strings in
subsequent
searches.
The type of
searches
Clearinghouse
want
avoid
those like "gas-fired incinerator." The
more specific you are in the character
string that the system searches for, the
fewer items it will return.
That really takes care of the infor-
mation that can be searched at the
Process level. Though there are only
two items there, searches on these two
items either alone or in conjunction with
another item such as the Pollutant
Name should be able to take care of the
majority of your search needs. (HINT:
For Pollutant Name use the abbrevia-
tion [PM, NOX, VOC, etc.] unless it is a
pollutant like formaldehyde or toluene,
and then use the CONTAINS clause
and only part of the name.)
If you have a specific problem find-
ing something that you think should be
in the database, but can't seem to lo-
cate, give me a call at (919) 541-2736
and I'll see if I can think of a way to
structure the search. Happy searching!
ggg
WE NEED YOUR HELP !!
As part of our role in the Federal
Small Business Assistance Pro-
gram (SBAP), the CTC is compiling
a mailing list of State SBAP Con-
tacts. If you are involved In SBAP
activities, please call Deborah El-
more at (919)541 -5437. If you know
someone else involved In SBAP
activities, please pass this note on
to them.	
EXPLOSIVE/
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE SITE
REMEDIATION
By Justice Manning
	CERI/ORD	
EPA's Office of Research and De-
velopment and the Department of De-
fense (DOD) are co-sponsoring a semi-
nar series entitled, "Technologies for
Remediating Sites Contaminated with
Explosive and Radioactive Wastes."
The seminars are scheduled for four
locations throughout the country in July
and August.
The development of the national
defense weapons systems, aircraft
control systems, and space exploration
equipment has resulted in the contami-
nation of air, soil, and ground water with
explosives and radioactive wastes.
EPA and DOD site restoration pro-
grams may require the remediation of
contamination through a variety of treat-
ment and disposal technologies. In
addition, the military services use open
burning/open detonation, static firing,
and/or incineration to demilitarize pro-
pellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.
These activities may be regulated under
Subpart X, 40CFR264, Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for
the protection of human health and the
environment.
Technologies, sampling tech-
niques, and analytical methods appli-
cable to remediation, as well as compli-
ance with the technical requirements of
RCRA, will be the focus of these semi-
nars. This seminar series will not focus
on risk assessment, public health and
the environment, nor public health and
environmental cleanup criteria.
The seminar is free. However, reg-
istration will be limited to about 200
attendees. If you are interested in at-
tending you should contact Heike
Milhench at (617) 674-7319 for further
information or to register. The dates for
the seminars are:
•	July 20-21, 1993 Sacramento,
California
•	July 22-23, 1993 Dallas, Texas
•	August 24-25, 1993 Newark,
New Jersey
•	August 26-27,1993 Washington,
DC area
ERROR IN CTC IRON
FOUNDRY REPORT
By Bob Blaszczak
CTC Co-Chair, OAQPS
A significant error has been discov-
ered in the CTC report "Emission Fac-
tors for Iron Foundries — Criteria and
Toxic Pollutants," EPA-600/2-90-044.
The error affects the values in Table 3,
page 16. The error resulted from the
conversion of data from the reference,
which was in mg/m3, to mg/Mg iron
produced. The error resulted from mul-
tiplying the concentration by the sam-
pler flowrate instead of by the stack
flowrate. The values presented inTable
3 need to be multiplied by as much as
2,400 up to 12,000 times, depending on
the sample and stack flows in each test.
The approximate error factors for
each of the columns in Table 3 are:
•	Electric Arc Furnaces - 7,200
•	Cupola - 6,400
•	Inoculation - 2,400
•	Pouring -12,000
•	Green Sand Shakeout - 7,000
A correction to the report will be issued
soon and sent to all recipients. For more
information, please call the CTC HOT-
LINE.
CTC News page 3

-------
ORGANIC AIR
EMISSIONS FROM
TSDFS
By Justice Manning
CERI/ORD
The EPA's "Seminar Publication:
Organic Air Emissions from Waste
Management Facilities" (EPA-625/R-
92-003) is now available. The publica-
tion contains presentations from a se-
ries of waste management seminars
sponsored by EPA's Office of Air Qual-
ity Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
and Center for Environmental Re-
search Information (CERI), with sup-
port from the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. The seminars
focused on control technologies and
recently proposed and promulgated air
rules under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Clean
Air Act (CAA) that apply to waste man-
agement operations. The seminars
were designed to improve understand-
ing of these rules and to ensure that
EPA, State, and local permit writers and
enforcement personnel, and the regu-
lated community receive consistent
guidance related to implementation,
compliance, and enforcement activi-
ties.
The organic chemicals contained in
wastes processed during waste man-
agement operations can volatilize into
the atmosphere and cause toxic or car-
cinogenic effects, or contribute to ozone
formation. Because air emissions from
waste management operations pose a
threat to human health and the environ-
ment, regulations are developed to con-
trol organic air emissions from these
EXPLAINING ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS TO
SMALL BUSINESSES
by Deborah Elmore
CTC/OAQPS
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 will for the first time place environ-
mental regulations on thousands of small businesses. Since many small busi-
ness owners have limited technical expertise, it is often difficult for them to
understand the "techno-legal" language used in regulations and most associated
guidance materials. Therefore, as part of its role in the Federal Small Business
Assistance Program (SBAP), the CTC has prepared "A Guidebook for Explaining
Environmental Regulations to Small Businesses" (EPA-453/B-93-023). This
guidebook will help you develop materials that present technical and legal
information in easy-to-understand layman's terms. The goal is to create
something that the small business person will not only understand, but may
actually want to read.
The first section of this document addresses issues such as:
-	small business concerns
-	small business perceptions of government & regulations
-	writing for different educational levels & non-English speaking
audiences.
The next section includes tips on content & format, style, communication "tools,"
and presentation options. There is even a checklist to help you out.
Included throughout this guide are many examples of actual materials that
have been prepared to help small businesses. There is also a discussion on how
to simplify complex calculations. To order a copy, call the CTC HOTLINE. The
most important thing to remember, however, is to be flexible and be creative!
operations.
In June of 1990, EPA promulgated
standards under the authority of Sec-
tion 3004 of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments to RCRA. These
standards limit organic air emissions as
a class from process vents and equip-
ment leaks at hazardous waste treat-
ment, storage, and disposal facilities
(TSDFs) requiring a permit under Sub-
title C of RCRA. Additional RCRA stan-
dards are under development. On July
22, 1991, EPA proposed organic air
emissions standards from tanks, sur-
face impoundments, and containers at
hazardous waste TSDFs under RCRA
authority (56FR33491).
In March of 1990, the EPA promul-
gated standards under the authority of
Section 112 of the CAA that limit emis-
sions of benzene from benzene waste
operations. Revisions to these rules
were promulgated on January 7, 1993
(58FR3072).
This Seminar Publication is a
record of the presentations at waste
management workshops conducted in
all ten EPA regions. Some of the infor-
mation contained in this publication may
have been superseded by more recent
developments in the regulatory arena
that have occurred since the last work-
shop held in Denver, Colorado in March
1991. To get a free copy of this publica-
tion call CERI at (513) 569-7562, and
ask for it by title or by EPA number.
f Control Iechnology fienter NEWS ^
The CTC NEWS 
-------
INDOOR AIR BRANCH
By Kelly W. Leovic
AEERL
The Indoor Air Branch (IAB) of the
Air and Energy Engineering Research
Laboratory (AEERL) is one of the re-
search groups that support the CTC. It
is responsible for research to character-
ize the emission sources of indoor air
pollution, and to quantify the emission
rates of vapor-phase organic materials.
The objectives of the IAB are to: a)
develop methods and tools for evaluat-
ing both the sources of indoor air pollut-
ants and indoor air quality (IAQ) control
options; b) provide guidance to inter-
ested parties (both public and private)
on evaluation methods, source emis-
sions, and IAQ control; and c) influence
the private sector by encouraging the
production and use of materials and
products with inherently low emission
characteristics.
IAB research emphasizes:
•	techniques for measuring emission
rates of organic vapors from indoor
sources and understanding the adsorp-
tive and desorptive behavior of indoor
objects (commonly referred to as
"sinks"), and
•	indoor air quality models predicting
indoor concentrations and inhalation
exposures based on source/sink be-
havior and building ventilation.
Research is being done in two
emerging areas: methods for evaluat-
ing and controlling microbial growths on
indoor surfaces and biologically based
methods for evaluating organic vapor
emissions. IAB researchers also inves-
tigate indoor air cleaning devices.
Source Characterization Ftasflarrh
Present research includes:
1) development of mass transfer
models for sources of indoor air pollu-
tion;
2)	evaluation of the sink behavior of
indoor materials and furnishings;
3)	development of emission rate
data for selected indoor sources; and
4)	continued development of emis-
sion test methods and protocols.
Source research experiments in the
laboratory use small environmental test
chambers with precise environmental
control. Full scale tests are carried out
in an unoccupied instrumented residen-
tial test house. lAB's source character-
ization research focuses on emissions
of vapor-phase organic compounds
from indoor materials and products in-
cluding:
•	Wet Sources: caulking, adhesives,
stains, varnishes, paints, polishes,
waxes, and spot removers.
•	Dry Sources: particleboard, carpet(s),
panels, floor tile, moth cakes, and dry
cleaned clothes.
•	Sinks: painted gypsum board, ceiling
tile, windowglass, duct liners, carpet(s),
and upholstery.
The work conducted by IAB is inter-
nationally recognized. In 1990 the test
methods developed by IAB were pub-
lished by ASTM as Standard D5116-90,
"Standard Guide for Small-Scale Envi-
ronmental Chamber Determinations of
Organic Emissions from Indoor Materi-
als/Products." Also the Commission of
European Communities adopted lAB's
methods in their guidance document for
testing indoor sources.
Exposure Modelinn
Source/sink models predict human
exposure in terms of the pollutant con-
centration profile versus time, and
these predictions are verified by com-
paring them with measurements in the
test house. These models have also
been used to predict individual expo-
sures based on activities.
Source/sink models have predicted
the reduction in concentration from vari-
ous control techniques. This showed
that sinks play a major role in determin-
ing the long-term exposure to indoor air
pollutants. Concentrations after about
50 hours are often the result of re-
emissions from sinks. Sinks can make
sources difficult to manage.
Analysis of the models has shown
that increased ventilation can reduce
the impact of sources when the duration
of ventilation outlasts the decay of the
source emission rate, and if the amount
of pollutant removed by ventilation is
much greater that the amount of pollut-
ant deposited in the sink.
These models have also been used
to show that in-room and in-duct air
cleaners can be very effective in reduc-
ing the impact of a source on the build-
ing which contains the room with the
source. Source modification is effective
in both the room where the source is
located, and the rest of the building.
The exposure model includes the
effect of sources, sinks, air movement,
ventilation, control measures, and ac-
tivities on individual exposure.
The most extensive use of the
model has been in relating emission
data from chamber studies to concen-
tration profiles measured in the test
house. The good agreement of these
predictions and measurements was
shown in the paper "Comparison of
Data from an IAQ Test House with
Predictions of an IAQ Computer
Model," by L.E. Sparks, B.A. Tichenor,
J.B. White, and M.D. Jackson, pub-
lished in the journal "Indoor Air," Vol. 4,
pp 577-592, 1991.
Efforts are now underway to im-
prove the predictions of the model by
incorporating better source and sink
models. Preliminary work in this area
indicates that the error in predictions of
test house experiments for wet prod-
ucts can be reduced from about 20% to
less than 10%. Also, the improved
models eliminate many of the scaling
problems between chamber emission
factors and building emission factors.
The model will also incorporate eco-
nomic analysis, using the cost of control
options and the benefits of improved
IAQ. The model will also be modified to
improve its usefulness as a design tool.
Planned future efforts include refine-
ments for predicting ventilation effec-
tiveness, and a data base of values for
important model parameters - to make
the model easier to use.
+A


¦h
11

CTC News page 5

-------
BILL VATAVUK:
AN ENGINEER WHO
CAN WRITE
By Bob Blaszczak
CTC Co-Chair, OAQPS
Conventional wisdom has it that
engineers can't communicate well, es-
pecially on paper. Bill Vatavuk is an
exception to this rule. His many publica-
tions in both the technical and trade
literature are more than ample proof of
his writing ability. Unquestionably, he
deserves the title "author." First and
foremost, however, he is an engineer.
Bill graduated from Youngstown
State University (Youngstown, Ohio)
with a B.E. in chemical engineering in
1969. However, his career with EPA
began two years
before that. In
April 1967, he
was commis-
sioned a U.S.
Public Health Ser-
vice officer and,
during that sum-
mer and the next,
served as a
COSTEP (sum-
mer intern) with
EPA (then PHS)
in the air and solid
waste programs
in Cincinnati. Fol-
lowing gradua-
tion, Bill joined the
DuPont Company engineering depart-
ment, working in new product develop-
ment in Wilmington and Richmond. In
May 1970, he was called to active duty
with the PHS as a staff engineer in the
air program Office of Regional Activities
in Rockville, Maryland. Bill transferred
to the OAQPS National Air Data Branch
in September 1971. While there, he
wrote for the Compilation of Air Pollut-
ant Emission Factors (AP-42) and be-
gan developing a computer system for
storing stack test data.
In September 1974, he transferred
to the OAQPS Cost Analysis Branch,
the predecessor of today's Cost and
Economic Impact Section (CEIS) (in the
Standards Development Branch, Emis-
sion Standards Division), which has
supported OAQPS in the setting of na-
tional air quality and emission stan-
dards and also has assisted EPA re-
gional, State, and local air pollution pro-
grams. An international expert on air
pollution control cost estimating, Bill is
the cost consultant to OAQPS, and has
also helped other air program offices,
EPA regional offices, and many State
and local agencies in cost-related mat-
ters.
The most important tool in his cost
consultant's tool box is the OAQPS
Control Cost Manual and its supple-
ments, (EPA-450/3-90-006, -006a, and
-006b). Bill directed preparation of this
unique report which has been the stan-
dard reference for estimating air pollu-
tion control costs for more than 15
years. To supple-
ment the Manual,
he has begun is-
suing "Cost Guid-
ance Memos,"
mini-reports that
address cost top-
ics of general in-
terest. But Bill's
responsibilities
are not limited to
cost work alone.
He also as-
sembles the CEIS
monthly report, a
task that allows
him to wear two
hats (editor and
engineer) at once.
Bill has received two EPA Bronze
Medals during his career. The first, in
1987, recognized his cost analysis con-
tributions in developing the PM10 Na-
tional Ambient Air Quality Standard. His
second medal was for his 1988 work on
the UNIVAC-IBM conversion team. He
also received a plaque to recognize his
charter membership in the OAQPS Hu-
man Resources Mini-Council, for which
he co-founded and edited the Mini-
Council newsletter, Air Mail. An active
member of the U.S. PHS Commis-
sioned Officers Association, he has
twice served as president of the North
Carolina Branch.
In his spare time, Bill is a prolific
free-lance writer. He has written two
books. The first, Dawn of Peace (1989),
is an account of the Civil War surrender
at the Bennett Place near Durham, NC.
In May 1990, he appeared on the state-
wide television program, "North Caro-
lina People," to discuss this book which
was also nominated for the 1990
Pulitzer Prize and the North Carolina
Mayflower Award. His second book,
Marketing Yourself With Technical
Writing: A Guide for Today's Profes-
sionals (1992), is a primer for anyone
interested in advancing his/her career
via technical publication. An excerpt
from the book was published in Chemi-
cal Engineering magazine. Bill also has
published hundreds of articles and re-
views for a variety of national trade
magazines, from Catholic Digest to
Writer's Digest, as well as for several
technical journals.
Bill has also been active in his com-
munity. He is a director of the North
Carolina 4-H Development Fund and
was the publicity chairman of the His-
toric Preservation Society of Durham.
As chairman of the Bennett Place Advi-
sory Committee, he helps promote and
preserve the site where the Civil War
really ended.
Last, but certainly not least, he is a
fifth-grade CCD (Sunday school)
teacher at his parish.
In recognition of his accomplish-
ments Bill has been listed in Marquis'
Who's Who in the South and Southwest
(1993-94 edition) and the 1992-93
Who's Who Environmental Registry.
He also has been nominated for Mar-
quis' Who's Who in Science and Engi-
neering.
With his wife, Betsy, a former De-
partment of Health and Human Ser-
vices executive secretary and two-time
4-H national winner, Bill sells crafts and
baked goods at a local farmers' market
every Saturday. Occasionally assisting
them is their 11 -year-old son, Chandler,
an avid reader, sports card collector,
and straight-A student. Chandler also
just earned his first publication, a poem
in the 1992 Anthology of Poetry
by Young Americans. (A chip off I
the old block?)
CTC News page 6

-------
CONTROL OF VOC'S
By Bob Blaszczak
CTC Co-chair, OAQPS
The Chemicals and Petroleum
Branch, Emissions Standards Division,
OAQPS recently completed "Control
Techniques of Volatile Organic Com-
pound Emissions from Stationary
Sources" (EPA-453/R-92-018). This
document is the third edition of a report
originally published by the Department
of Health, Education and Welfare
(HEW) titled, "Control Techniques for
Hydrocarbon and Organic Solvent
Emissions from Stationary Sources
(AP-68)." The first edition was pub-
lished in March of 1970 by the National
Air Pollution Control Administration, a
part of HEW. The second edition was
published by EPA in May of 1978. It
contained numerous changes from the
original and was retitled "Control Tech-
niques for Volatile Organic Emissions
from Stationary Sources" (EPA-450/2-
78- 022) to better express the EPA's
concern with pollutants other than hy-
drocarbons. This third edition incorpo-
rates the knowledge gained by the EPA
during the years subsequent to 1978
and condenses it for easy reference.
This document is intended to be a
general reference to State and local
agency pollution control engineers, but
will serve a much broader clientele. It
can be used to provide:
1)	summary information and refer-
ence material on sources of oxidant
precursors and control of these
sources,
2)	estimates of control costs, and
3)	estimates of emission reductions
achievable through control.
F G°P'es are available through the
A s Environmental Research Center
th m at (919) 541 "2777, or through
N®l!°nal Technical Information Ser-
ce (NTIS) at (800) 553-6847. When
ering through NTIS refer to NTIS
°cument No. PB93-150258.
BB
TECH NOTEBOOK
DO YOU HAVE
PROBLEMS
DOWNLOADING FROM
RBLC?
By Lyndon S. Cox
Senior Environmental Employee
Many CTC Hotline callers are unfa-
miliarwith electronicbulletin boards and
have little or no experience in download-
ing files. The problems they experience
are compounded by some of the com-
mands used in the BUS section of the
Bulletin Board System (BBS). The in-
formation given here should clarify
some of the more common problems.
First, the person downloading a file
should give the DOS filename when
asked which file is to be downloaded.
You can recognize the DOS filename by
the fact that it contains up to eight
alphanumeric characters followed (op-
tionally) by a period and an extension of
up to three characters. The limit to eight
characters in the filename usually pro-
duces interesting abbreviations of de-
scriptive English filenames. (Examples
from MS-DOS are SMARTDRV for
"smart drive" and CHKDSK for "check
disk.") Notethat once the period and the
extension have been used in the
filename they are no longer optional but
must be included thereafter for satisfac-
tory file transfers.
BUS assigns an eight character
nonsense word as the filename for each
downloadable file but does not assign
an extension until you have selected the
form (appendix, ASCII, or database)
and the file transfer protocol.
For communications packages
such as CROSSTALK, XMODEM is the
protocol of choice and you should select
it. However, if you are familiar with
another transfer protocol (such as
Kermit, Vmodem, or Zmodem) and your
software is able to employ it, BLIS will
allow you to select and use it.
When you have defined the form of
the file, BLIS gives the filename a period
and an extension (for example,
BLDF0005.DBF for a dBASE format).
You may either use the BLIS-assigned
filename or assign the file a DOS-com-
patible name of your choosing. You
must then return to your communica-
tions software to indicate that you are
ready to receive this file, using the se-
lected protocol and the assigned
filename.
Communications software (such as
CROSSTALK) has two operating
modes: i.e., command morie and termi-
nal mode. In command mode, your
keyboard "talks" to the software in your
own computer. In terminal mode, your
keyboard 'talks" to the software in the
remote computer. CROSSTALK, when
new, comes with ESCAPE being set as
the kev that switches between these
modes. Unfortunately, BLIS uses ES-
CAPE to go to the preceding screen.
When both of these happen together,
the result is an impasse. Therefore,
CROSSTALK users must select an al-
ternative to ESCAPE as the key that
switches between modes. The combi-
nation of the Alt key and the 'A' key
(ALT+A) is a good choice. Youcantell
when you reach command mode in
CROSSTALK because a bright strip
appears across the bottom of the
screen, and "COMMAND ?" appears in
dark letters on the strip. In command
mode, you can query your communica-
tions software as to how to initiate the
file transfer and then key in the neces-
sary commands.
Your software will determine how
soon the download must begin. If it
does not occur within that time limit,
then the BLIS download process must
be repeated to make the file available
once again. Note the filename that is
assigned by BLIS and use it in the
download to reduce the time you require
to start the download process at your
computer. The name of the file can be
changed later, using either the "re-
name" or "save as" capability of a word
processor or the REN command of
DOS to make it meaningful.
Note that, in the language of com-
puter users, downloading alludes to re-
ceiving a file from the telephone lines
that are "up on the poles," while upload-
ing alludes to sending a file "up to the
telephone line" for transmission to an-
other computer.	___
CTC News page 7

-------
CTC ASSISTANCE
No cost assistance to staff of State and Local agencies
and EPA Regional Offices on air pollution control technology
issues.
CTC HOTLINE: CALL (919) 541-0800 to access EPA expert
staff for consultations, references to pertinent literature, or
access to EPA technical data and analyses. No question is
too simple!
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROJECTS: If you need in-
depth assistance concerning a specific control technology
problem, call the HOTLINE or write the CTC. EPA staff and
contractors are available for short-term projects such as
review of proposed or existing control technology applica-
tions. Projects are subject to CTC Steering Committee
approval.
TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PROJECTS: If the CTC receives
a number of similar HOTLINE calls or a joint request from a
group of agencies, the CTC Steering Committee may under-
take broad, long-term projects of national or regional interest.
The result may be a control technology document for a
particular type of source, microcomputer software, or semi-
nars and workshops.
V
CTC BBS:Call (919) 541-5742 for 1200/2400/9600 baud
modem to access the CTC Bulletin Board. Set communica-
tions parameters to 8 data bits, N parity, and 1 stop bit, and
use aterminal emulation of VT100, VTt02,or ANSI. You may
leave HOTLINE requests, order documents, suggest
projects, and download software. The BBS Is part of the
OAQPS Technology Transfer Network.
FEDERAL SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
(FSBAP): Call the CTC HOTLINE to access the FSBAP. The
CTC is the focal point for coordination of efforts among the
four EPA centers participating in the program. The Federal
program is intended to support State Small Business Assis-
tance Programs, as required by the Clean Air Act
RACT/BACT/LAER CLEARINGHOUSE (RBLC): The BUS
database is available on the OAQPS TTN B BS. (For informa-
tion on connecting see the CTC BBS above.} The Clearing-
house provides summary information for control technology
determinations made by permitting agencies.
GLOBAL GREENHOUSE GASES TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER CENTER (GGGTTC): Call the CTC HOTLINE
to access GGGTTC information on greenhouse gas emis-
sions, prevention, mitigation, and control strategies.
							J
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S.Postage Paid
EPA.
Permit No. G-35
CTC.ESD (MD-13)
U S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

-------