CORPORATION
AN AIR POLLUTION COMPLIANCE
ANALYSIS REPORT ON NINE
INDUSTRIES
VOLUME II
FERROALLOYS
FINAL REPORT
-------
CORPORATION
AN AIR POLLUTION COMPLIANCE
ANALYSIS REPORT OH NINE
INDUSTRIES
VOLUME II
FERROALLOYS
FINAL REPORT
Presented to:
Robert C. Marshall, Project Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Stationary Source Enforcement
Waterside Mall
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
25 September 1975
Prepared by:
B. P. Cerepaka, Task Director
8500 Shoal Creek Blvd./P.O. Box 9948/Austin, Texas 78766/(512)454-4797
-------
R DIA eoRPOum
This report is one of nine furnished to the
Environmental Protection Agency in fulfillment
of contracts 68-02-1319, Task 16 and 68-02-
1383, Task 11. The Project Officer was Mr.
Robert C. Marshall, Division of Stationary
Source Enforcement. This report does not
necessarily represent the views or policies
of the Agency.
-------
RADIA CORPORATION
FOREWORD
This study of the ferroalloy industry is one of nine
concurrently accomplished tasks to locate individual plants and
production rates, analyze processes and air emissions, and pre-
sent compliance status data for nine large industries. The re-
maining eight, presented in individual volumes, are primary
aluminum, portland cement, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphate
fertilizer, coal cleaning, gray iron, and asphalt concrete. In
this study, Radian considered only the process emission points
for which EPA has published emission factors. One study esti-
mated totals for the emission points of these nine industries to
be 1,975,000 tons of particulates and 600,000 tons of sulfur
dioxide in 1967 (LE-125). Another study estimated 1968 particu-
late emissions from these nine to be 1,850,000 tons (VA-091).
Program Manager for the entire nine industry task was
Mr. C. P. Bartosh. Mr. B. P. Cerepaka was Task Director.
i
-------
RADU1 corp m
ABSTRACT
The following study involved the ferroalloy industry
in the United States. The goals of the study were to locate
plants, obtain all available process, production, and emissions
data, compute allowable particulate emissions from the SIPs,
and determine the compliance status from the compliance Data
System (CDS) and, if needed, regional office files.
In 1973 United States ferroalloy production was 2,520,000
tons of which the primary types were ferromanganese, silicoman-
ganese, ferrosilicon, silvery pig iron, chromium alloys, and
ferrophosphorus. The industry was reported to be operating at
capacity. The number of producing plants was forty-seven
according to the Minerals Yearbook 1973.
Total nationwide potential, actual, and allowable
particulate emissions could not be obtained from individual
plant data. Complete data on individual plant capacities and
production were also not available. Radian performed calculations
to estimate potential particulate emissions for those ferroalloy
products which have operations covered by EPA emission factors.
Based on 1972 production of 1,794,000 tons of ferrosilicon (in-
cluding silicon metal), ferromanganese, and silicomanganese,
potential emissions were calculated to be 138,000 tons. EPA
has not published emission factors for the production of the
remaining ferroalloys (EN-071). Another study estimated actual
particulate emissions from ferroalloy furnaces in 1968 to be
about 151,000 tons with an average control level of about 40%
(VA-091).
For the fifty-seven ferroalloy plants located in tnis;
study, five (9%) were reported to be in compliance, nine (16%)
ii
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
out of compliance, and forty-three (75%) unknown. These catagories
are subdivided as follows: three plants (5%) were in compliance
with emission limitations as determined by source test, inspec-
tion, or state certification, two plants (4%) were in compliance
with the increments of progress of a schedule, three plants (5%)
were out of compliance with emission limitations, six plants (11%)
were out of compliance with the increments of progress of a
compliance schedule, twenty-four plants (42%) had unknown status
with respect to emission limitations, and nineteen plants (33%)
had unknown compliance with increments of progress of a schedule.
Table 6.2-la showing the compliance status breakdown by region
follows this page for easy reference.
iii
-------
RADIAL CORPORATION
TABLE 6.2-la
FERROALLOY PLANTS
CATEGORICAL SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE STATUS BY REGION
MAY, 1975
REGION
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
TOTAL
w
o
o
H
s
H
S
IN
Ijs
US
O co
U CO
M
ss
MM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
S3
w w
~J K
§ co
o
IS.
o
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
~Y
W H
gs
H H
US
o
fn H
O CO
CO
ss
O M
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
OUT
w
o
M w
it
o w
°g
h CO
o
& M
o S
0
0
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
UNKNOWN
i W
I O
W
1§
o o
o w
J£
0
4
3
9
6
0
0
0
0
2
3 CO
IB
la.
0
1
6
11
1
0
0
0
0
0
3 2 3 6 24 19
(5%) (47c) (5%) (11%) (42%) (33%)
v.
J v_
TOTAL
0
5
13
20
9
2
1
1
0
6
57
TOTAL
5
(9%)
9
(16%)
43
(75%)
57
iv
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD i
ABSTRACT ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Industry Definition and Characterization . . 2
1.2 Production and Capacity 3
2.0 FERROALLOY PRODUCTION PROCESSES 7
2.1 Submerged-Arc Furnace Process 7
2.2 Exothermic Process 11
2.3 Electrolytic Process 11
2.4 Vacuum Furnace Process 12
2.5 Induction Furnace Process 12
3.0 EMISSIONS AND CONTROLS 15
3.1 Emissions Sources 15
3.2 Potential Particulate Emissions 15
3.3 Emission Controls 17
3.3.1 Open Furnace Control 17
3.3.2 Covered Furnace Controls 19
4.0 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REGULATIONS 23
5.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 27
6.0 DATA SOURCES, SUMMARIES, AND TABLES OF
INDIVIDUAL PLANTS 28
6.1 Sources of Data . 28
6.1.1 Processes and Emissions 28
6.1.2 Compliance Status 28
6.2 Summaries of Emissions and Compliance Status 30
6.2.1 Emissions 30
6.2.2 Compliance Status 30
6.3 Data Tables of Individual Sources 34
APPENDIX 1
CONTROL EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CODES
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1.2-1 FERROALLOY PRODUCERS 6
2.1-1 CROSS SECTION OF OPEN FURNACE 10
2.4-1 SIMPLEX VACUUM FURNACE FOR FERROALLOY PRODUCTION. 13
2.5-1 INDUCTION MELTING FURNACE 14
3.1-1 FERROALLOY PRODUCTION FLOW DIAGRAM 16
3.3-1 OPEN FURNACE CONTROLLED BY A VENTURI SCRUBBER . . 18
3.3-2 SEMI-ENCLOSED FURNACE CONTROLLED BY A VENTURI
SCRUBBER 21
3.3-3 SEALED FURNACE CONTROLLED BY VENTURI SCRUBBER . . 22
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
LIST OF TABLES
Page
1.2-1 FERROALLOY PRODUCTION STATISTICS (TONS) 4
2.0-1 FERROALLOY PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND PRODUCTS. . . 8
4.0-1 SIP AIR EMISSION REGULATIONS
EXISTING FERROALLOY PLANTS 24
6.2-la FERROALLOY PLANTS
CATEGORICAL SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE STATUS BY
REGION 31
6.2-lb EXISTING PRIMARY FERROALLOY PLANTS
SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE STATUS BY REGION 32
6.2-2 COMPLIANCE STATUS CODES 33
DATA TABLES OF INDIVIDUAL SOURCES
6.3-1 to 6.3-2 REGION II 36
6.3-3 to 6.3-4 REGION III 42
6.3-5 to 6.3-10 REGION IV 53
6.3-10 REGION V 76
6.3-11 REGION VI 84
6.3-12 REGION VII 87
6.3-13 REGION VIII 90
6.3-14 to 6.3-16 REGION X 93
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The major goals of this study of the ferroalloy industry
were to (1) locate all ferroalloy plants; (2) gather data on pro-
cesses, production, and emissions; (3) calculate allowable emis-
sions based on state implementation plans (SIPs); and (4) deter-
mine each source's compliance status as given in the Compliance
Data System (CDS) or through contact with the regional offices.
Plant size and location were the priority goals.
The format of this report is as follows:
The remainder of this section presents a defini-
tion and characterization of the industry and future
trends expected.
Section 2 describes the process of ferroalloy
production.
Section 3 describes air pollutant emissions and
control devices.
Section 4 is a summary of the SIP regulations
applicable to ferroalloy plants.
Section 6 presents the data gathered for
individual plants and also summaries.
1
-------
1.1 Industry Definition and Characterization
In this report the definition of ferroalloys is that
employed by the Bureau of Mines. Ferroalloys are alloys of iron
in combination with some other element otLelements. The major
types by tonnage produced in the United States are ferromanganese,
silicomanganese, ferrosilicon (including silicon metal), silvery
pig iron, chromium alloys, and ferrophosphorus. The major uses
of ferroalloys are as additive constituents in the production of
steel, cast iron, and aluminum (US-144). Specifically, ferro-
manganese and silicomanganese are used in the iron and steel
industry to counteract the effects of sulfur, thereby improving
hot working properties during rolling. The alloys are also used
to deoxidize and clean molten steel. Ferrochromium and other
chromium alloys are important additives in steel because they re-
duce corrosion and oxidation. Ferrosilicon alloys are also pri-
marily used in the iron and steel industry. Silvery pig iron (5-
24% Si) is used in gray iron production, ferrosilicon (25-95% Si)
is used in steel production for deoxidation of molten metal and
removal of dissolved gases. Silicon metal (95-99% Si) is used
by secondary aluminum producers to improve corrosion resistance
and mechanical properties of aluminum castings.
Ferroalloys are made by a variety of processes such
as electric submerged - arc smelting, alumino/silicothermic pro-
cess, vacuum process and electrolytic production. Ferroalloys
for the steel industry have also been produced in blast furnaces.
For purposes of locating plants, all types of production processes
were included in this study, but for estimations of emissions
this study deals only with electric smelting furnaces since these
are the only ferroalloy operations for which EPA has published
emission factors. Over 75% of ferroalloy production is by the
electric smelting process (EN-067).
2
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
The ferroalloy industry is classified by the Standard
Industrial Classifications Manual 1972 by SIC code 3313, except
for those establishments which produce ferroalloys in blast
furnaces. SIC code 3312 is used for these establishments.
1.2 Production and Capacity
Ferroalloy production in the United States is highly
competitive and directly related to demand levels for steel,
cast iron, and aluminum (US-064, US-144),
Total ferroalloy production in the United States has not
exhibited many major trends in the recent years. Production re-
ported by the Bureau of Mines has varied from 2,628,000 tons in
1969 to 2,520,000 tons in 1973. See Table 1.2-1. Production of
individual ferroalloy groups varies according to market conditions,
raw material availability, and foreign competition. Ferroman-
ganese (27% of 1973 ferroalloy production) and silicomanganese (7%)
production have been dropping recently due to foreign competition.
Domestic laclc of the raw material, manganese ore, is also a major
factor. Chromium alloy production (17%) also declined due to
dependence on foreign ore. Ferrosilicon production (35%) has
been increasing recently in response to market demand. An ample
domestic ore supply of quartz allows U.S. ferrosilicon producers
to compete successfully with foreign firms. Silvery pig iron
production (5%) has been slowly declining as a result of decreasing
demand by its primary consumer, the gray iron industry.
EPA reported the existence of 44 ferroalloy plants (in-
cluding 4 which produce only calcium carbide) operating 145 ferro-
alloy furnaces in 1971. Electric furnaces are rated by power
supplied to the electrodes. In the ferroalloy industry furnaces
range in size from 7 to 50 megawatts with about 10 Mw
being characteristic of older furnaces and 30 Mw for newer furnaces.
3
-------
Product
Ferromanganese
Silicomanganese
Ferrosilicon
Silvery Pig Iron
Chromium Alloys
Ferrotitanium
Ferrophosphorus
Ferrocolumbium
Other
Total
TABLE 1.2-1
FERROALLOY PRODUCTION STATISTICS (TONS)
1969 1970 1971
852,019
222,877
715,172
204,027
419,038
4,441
130,582
2,301
78,046
2,628,503
835,463
193,219
709,287
196,369
405,776
3,360
164,107
1,260
86,347
2,595,188
759,896
164,682
687,166
171,788
355,658
3,363
101,353
830
86,329
2,331,055
1972
800,723
153,234
841,386
163,073
352,305
3,650
130,355
1,160
80,738
2,526,624
1973
683,075
183,702
877,798
135,009
426,846
1,784
129,646
1,167
80,928
2,519,955
Source: (US-064,
US-
144)
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
Capacity depends on the type of product produced by the furnace.
A 30 Mw furnace operating at 90% capacity would produce 99,000
tons of ferromanganese, 44,000 tons of silicomanganese, 47,500
tons of 507o ferrosilicon, 51,000 tons of ferrochromium, or about
17,000 tons of silicon metal (DE-151).
The Minerals Yearbook 1973 reported production of
ferroalloys at forty seven locations, not including one new
plant under construction in Alabama. The types of furnaces
in use were also reported. Forty one plants produced ferroalloys
in electric furnaces, five operated aluminothermic furnaces,
and two produced in blast furnaces at steel mills. One producer
used both aluminothermic and electric furnaces.
In this study Radian has located fifty seven plants
which are reported to produce ferroalloys. In addition, one
plant is reported under construction. Forty-eight were located
in the Minerals Yearbook, 1973, nine others were found only
in NEDS, CDS data bases, and one was found in the Texas Index
of Manufacturers 19 74.. Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and
Alabama are states with the most ferroalloy plants. See
Figure 1.2-1.
5
-------
™*snunaro5
HOflTH OAKO'A
feo»5|V»
SOUTH OAKOTA
.iimHESO™
SV hsz%SS
hmmo
Ncvisss
5S5wj«"
COLORADO
* Denver
n'jfljSDS
o^^rsssss®
aauoma
NEW MEXICO
\V \ *^a
* Do"ao
¦ OwisiW^
IIAV.*"
i including One Under
Cooettttctlon
figure
i.j-1. FEWOALW^ TOODUCERS
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
2.0 FERROALLOY PRODUCTION PROCESSES
This section describes the production of ferroalloys.
Ferroalloys are usually produced by carbothermal smelting in
electric submerged-arc furnaces. Depending on the product made,
the raw materials used most often are quartz, manganese ore, chrome
ore, scrap iron, and reducing agent. Sometimes wood chips are
required for porosity within the furnace charge. The purpose
of the reducing agent is to remove oxygen from the metallic oxide
ore so that droplets of the metal fall to the hearth and form
a metal pool. The reducing agent is usually in the form of lumpy
or pea-size by-product coke and low-volatile coal (DE-151).
Besides the submerged-arc furnace process, ferroalloys are made
by the exothermic process, electrolytic process, vacuum furnace
process, and induction furnace process. Table 2.0-1 gives a
listing of the types of ferroalloy products made by each process.
About 75% of ferroalloy tonnage is produced in submerged arc
furnaces (EN-071). Details of the operations of each process
are described below.
2.1 Submerged-Arc Furnace Process
The general design of submerged-arc furnaces is basically
the same throughout the industry. The steel furnace shell is
normally cylindrical with a flat bottom and is supported on an
open foundation that permits air cooling and heat dissipation.
The bottom interior of the steel shell is lined with two or more
layers of carbon blocks sealed with mortar. The furnace shell's
interior walls are lined with refractory or carbon brick. One
or more tapholes for removing slag and metal are provided through
the furnace shell at the hearth level. In some cases, the furnace
is designed to rotate (DE-151).
7
-------
TABLE 2.0-1
FERROALLOY PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND PRODUCTS
Submerged-arc furnace process
(Electric furnace)
Exothermic process
(Aluminothermic)
Electrolytic process -
Vacuum furnace process -
Induction furnace process
Blast furnace process -
Silvery iron (15-22% FeSi)
50% Ferrosilicon
65-75% Ferrosilicon
Silicon metal
Calcium silicon
Silicon-manganese-zirconium (SMZ)
High-carbon (HC) ferromanganese
S iliconmanganes e
Ferromanganese silicon
Charge chrome and HC ferrochrome
Ferrochrome-silicon
Ferrophophorus
Low-carbon (LC) ferrochrome
LC ferromanganese
Medium-carbon (MC) ferromanganese
Chromium metal, FeTi, FeV and FeCb
Chromium metal
Manganese metal
LC ferrochrome
Ferrotitanium
Ferromanganese
SOURCE: (DE-151, US-144)
8
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
The furnace process is continuous. Power is continuously
applied to the electrodes, and feed materials that consist mostly
of reducing material (coal or coke) and ores may be charged to
the furnace on either a continuous or an intermittent basis.
Normally three electrodes are used and are suspended over the
furnace hearth in a delta formation. They protrude into the
furnace charge to a depth of 3 to 5 feet and their vertical move-
ment is controlled by mechanical or hydraulic means. This
electrode depth is continually varied as required to maintain
a near-uniform electrical load. The trend is to use self-baking
electrodes for new large furnaces. The major smelting occurs in
the "reaction zones" surrounding the electrodes. This smelting
utilizes carbon reduction of metallic oxides (DE-151).
Submerged-arc furnaces have been generally built with
open tops and the reaction gases burn on the surface of the charge.
The combusted gases are vented to the atmosphere through roof
monitors, or collected by a hood over the furnace crucible and
directed by duct work to dust removal equipment or vented by
stacks to the atomsphere. The furnace parts over the crucible,
such as the electrode holders, the hangers, the current conductors,
the contact plates, and the charging chutes, are exposed to the
radiant heat of the furnace and hot furnace gases. These com-
ponents must receive effective heat protection through the use of
cooling water flowing through interior passages in the metal parts.
Figure 2.1-1 shows a cross section of a typical open furnace and
some accessory equipment. Some ferroalloys, such as high silicons,
require regular stoking and directed mix placement, which can only
be performed in an open furnace.
Submerged-arc furnaces producing certain ferroalloys
have water-cooled covers. The collected uncombusted gases are
cleaned by venturi or centrifugal scrubbers, and the gases may be
flared or used as fuel. In such furnaces, the raw materials
9
-------
R DIA o powmoN
CRANE FOR PASTE J
AND CASING HANDLING
TAPPING
FLOOR
ELECTRODE CASING
" PLATFORM
GAS OFFTAKE
INDUCED
INDUCED
AIR
Capacitor
i i
HEARTH LINE
Li ;LE
{TRANSFORMER
'.! Ill
I OPERATING
FLOOR
FIGURE 2.1-1 CROSS SECTION OF OPEIJ FUEJACE
10
-------
RADIA ci PORiniON
required to produce the low-energy products do not tend to bridge
excessively, and regular stoking of the charge is not necessary
(DE-151).
2.2 Exothermic Process
Several metals and low-carbon ferroalloys are produced
by the exothermic process, also called the aluminothermic or silico-
thermic process. However, it is used to a lesser extent than
the submerged-arc furnace process. Most of the charge material
used in the exothermic process may be first produced by the sub-
merged-arc or open-arc furnaces. Silicon or aluminum, or a com-
bination of the two, is the reducing agent. This agent reacts
with the charge to remove oxygen, thus generating considerable
heat; temperatures may reach several thousand degrees. Since the
process is exothermic, the reduction can take place outside a
furnace--usually in ladles (DE-151).
2.3 Electrolytic Process
The pure metals of manganese and chromium are now
generally produced electrolytically. In this process, simple
ions of the metal contained in an electrolyte of modest con-
centration are plated on cathodes by a low-voltage direct current.
The pure metal, collected as a film about 1/8 inch thick on the
cathode, is removed and prepared for shipment. Metal deposition
usually occurs in a number of cells with multiple plates connected
in a series of parallel electrical circuits; all are contained in
a ventilated building.
Because electrolyte preparation is complex, feed materials
require some chemical preprocessing. For example, manganese ores
are calcined and leached (usually to form manganese sulfate),
11
-------
RADIAN CORPfl BTfON
mixed with ammonium salts, and delivered in solution to the bath.
The sources of the feed materials are ores, high-metal-oxide slags,
and ferroalloys produced in submerged-arc furnaces (DE-151).
2.4 Vacuum Furnace Process
The vacuum furnace process for producing LC ferrochrome
was developed commercially in the early 1950's. In this process,
carbon is removed from HC ferrochrome in a solid state within
vacuum furnaces (see Figure 2.4-1) carefully controlled at a
temperature near the melting point of the alloy. The process is
based on the oxidation of HC ferrochrome by the oxygen in silica
or chrome oxide. Carbon monoxide gas resulting from the reaction
is pumped out of the furance to maintain a high vacuum and to
facilitate decarburization of the ferrochrome. Heat is supplied
to the furances by electric resistance elements. The vacuum
furnace process causes no particulate emissions. The small quan-
tities of carbon monoxide gas that evolve from the reaction are
withdrawn by a steam jet ejector (DE-151).
2.5 Induction Furnace Process
Induction furnaces, either low-frequency or high-fre-
quency, are used to produce small tonnages of a few specialty
alloys through remelting of the required constituents. See
Figure 2.5-1 (DE-151).
12
-------
TO VACUUM
PUMPING SYSTEM
TO INERT
GAS COOLING
u>
CARBON
RESISTORS
ELECTRICAL
LEADS
REMOVABLE
END CLOSURE
TRACK
HEARTH
CAR
FURNACE
CHARGE
FIGURE 2.4-1 SIMPLEX VACUUM FURNACE FOR FERROALLOY PRODUCTION
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
OPERATOR PANEL
I PLATFORM
TT
FURNACE
CRUCIBLE
ELECTRICAL LEADS
CI".
CAPACITORS
FIGURE 2.5-1 INDUCTION MELTING FURNACE
14
-------
R DIA CORPORATI
3.0 EMISSIONS AMD CONTROLS
This section presents a description of air pollutant
emissions and control at ferroalloy plants. Electric submerged
arc furnaces are the only operations with EPA emission factors
(EN-071). Quantitative analysis of emissions are restricted to
ferroalloy production from this type of operation.
3.1 Emissions Sources
Sources of particulate emissions at ferroalloy plants
are raw material storage, handling, and preparation, electric
smelting, tapping, casting, and product storage, handling and
sizing. These emission points are displayed graphically in Figure
3.1-1. The electric furnace is also a major source of carbon
monoxide emissions. Oxides of sulfur and nitrogen are not signi-
ficant emissions from ferroalloy production (DE-151).
3.2 Potential Particulate Emissions
EPA has published emission factors only for electric-
arc furnaces operations. They vary according to the type of
ferroalloy produced and the power input to the furnace per ton
of ferroalloy produced. Potential emission factors are 200 lbs/
ton of 507« ferrosilicon produced, 315 lbs/ton of 15% ferrosilicon
produced, 565 lbs/ton of 90% ferrosilicon produced, 625 lbs/ton
silicon metal produced, 195 lbs/ton silicomanganese produced and
45 lbs/ton ferromanganese produced (EN-071).
Emissions from exothermic ferroalloy production are
reported to range from 20 to 40 lbs/ton of ferroalloy produced.
Total emissions from this type of process are relatively small
since only 10 to 15 percent of all ferroalloy production is by
15
-------
FIGURE 3.1-1
- FERROALLOY PRODUCTION FLOW DIAGRAM
SOURCE: (DE-151)
OUST AND
//FUMES
OUST AND
FUHESO
FUUES
CRUSHING
NEIGH-FEEDING
SMELTING TAPPING
STORAGE
STORAGE
CRUSHING screening
-------
RADIA CORPORATION
the exothermic process (DE-151). Emissions from electrolytic
process and vacuum and induction furnace processes are also rela-
tively small. (DE-151)-.
3.3 Emission Controls
Electric-arc furnace particulate control systems and
levels of control vary with the type of hood which covers the
furnace. There are three types: the open furnace, the semi-
enclosed furnace, and the enclosed or sealed furnace. Both the
semi-enclosed and enclosed furnaces are sometimes referred to
as covered furnaces. Control systems also service emissions
captured by hoods over the tapping operations at electric furnaces.
In the open furnace carbon monoxide and other combustibles
in the furnace offgas burn with induced air at the charge sur-
face. In the covered furnaces, most or all of the combustibles
and induced air are withdrawn without combustion from the charge
surface, vented to control devices, and then flared (DE-151).
3.3.1 Open Furnace Control
The open furnace requires high volumes of air flow to
capture emissions. The most popular control device used to clean
air captured by the hood is a venturi scrubber. Because of the
large volumes of air, particulate grain loadings are low and pres-
sure losses are high. The energy required to operate a scrubber
is equivalent to about 10 percent of power needed to operate the
furnace (DE-151). Figure 3.3-1 shows a typical open furnace
installation with scrubber. Overall control efficiencies
achievable are reported to range up to 96-99 percent. Fugitive
emissions,are relatively low for normal furnace operations, if
well hooded. Baghouses and electrostatic precipitation are
also used to control open furnace emissions (DE-151).
17
-------
00
ELECTRODES
EXTENDING
rca
THROUGH rCDi
MIX FEED
CHUTE
(TYPICAL)
TAP
HOLE
.*:• DUST;'
INDUCED AIR
I
8
VENTURJ
WATER
TO STACK
FIGURE 3.3-1 OPEN FURNACE CONTROLLED BY A VENTURI SCRUBBER
-------
RAD AN coRPonm
3.3.2 Covered Furnace Controls
Only venturi. scrubbers are reported to be used on covered
furnaces in the U.S., primarily because of high gas temperatures
and the safety hazard associated with the handling of carbon
monoxide. A covered ferroalloy furnace has a water-cooled cover
that seals the top of the furnace, including the electrodes, mix
spouts, and access openings. This seal prevents the induction of
ambient air that would otherwise bum the gases coming from the
reduction process. The dust-laden furnace gas is withdrawn from
under the cover, cleaned, and either used as fuel or flared
above the furnace building. The quantity of gas that needs
cleaning from a covered furnace can be only 3 to 5 percent of
that from an open furnace.
Two types of covered ferroalloy furnaces are currently
in operation. Developed in the 1930's, the initial version of
the covered ferroalloy furnace has mix seals at the electrodes
and is generally called a semi-covered or semi-enclosed furnace
(see Figure 3.3-2). A later version is essentially the same as
the earlier one except that tight or fixed seals are used in
place of mix seals at the electrodes. This configuration is
called a totally enclosed or sealed furnace (see Figure 3.3-3).
However, mix seals are maintained within the chutes at the cover
of the totally enclosed furnace by choke-feeding the material.
With a semi-enclosed furnace, the mix is charged to the
furnace through the annulus around each electrode, and an air
gap is established between the furnace cover and the mix chute to
prevent an electrical current flow. If enough mix is added to
keep this space filled, it acts as a seal that prevents or limits
the gases under the cover from escaping through the mix around
the electrodes. Efficiencies range from 75-98 percent for
19
-------
RAD AN CORPORATION
semi-enclosed furnaces. Fugitive emissions escaping from the mix
seals are the major reason for the low overall control efficiencies.
These fugitive losses have been reported to be 2 to 12 percent
of the total potential particulate emissions from the furnace.
In the totally enclosed furnace, seals are fixed insula-
tors around the electrodes and cover which allows the air pollu-
tion control system to collect essentially all of the dust and
fumes. Efficiencies of control are reported to exceed 99 percent.
No U.S. ferroalloy plants are known to use sealed furnaces (DE-
151).
20
-------
EXHAUST TO
ATMOSPHERE
L
a
AIR
COVER
¦S3
TAP HOLE m
vc£
^ £ r
ELECTRODES
/
; DUST
MIX
CHUTE
(TYPICAL)
FLARE
INDUCED
AIR
STACK
1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I I 1
I I
I I
1 1 1
• • . * . • V . .
* • • .
• • • • * V • • •
VENTURI
A
FIGURE 3.3-2 SEMI-ENCLOSED FURNACE CONTROLLED BY A VENTURI SCRUBBER
-------
ELECTRODES
ELECTRODE
SEAL
FLARE
MIX FEED
(TYPICAL)
tf.
COVER
STACK
TAP
HOLE
< Vi •
WATER
FIGURE 3.3-3 SEALED FURNACE CONTROLLED BY VENTURI SCRUBEER
-------
RADIA
CORPORATION
4.0 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REGULATIONS
SIP regulations were obtained from DSSE files in
December, 1974. A summary of applicable particulate emission
regulations is presented in Table 4.0-1 for those states which
have ferroalloy producers. Compliance analysis in this report
was restricted to furnace operations. Other fugitive emission
points may be affected by the SIPs. Any compliance schedules for
such emission points will appear with the data collected for
each plant in the tables in Section 6.3. Because of in-
complete process and production data for individual plants, no
calculations of allowables were made. The range of efficiencies
required by the SIPs depends on the ferroalloy product and furnace
size. The well-controlled open furnaces described in Section 3.3
would have efficiencies of about 96-99 percent.
23
-------
TABLE 4.0-1
SIP AIR EMISSION REGULATIONS
EXISTING FERROALLOY PLANTS
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
ENTITY NUMBER
Alabama
Florida
Idaho
Iowa
Kentucky
Montana
4.4.1
4.4.2
17-2.04(2)
H-Sec 2
4.3a
AP-3(3)(2)
16-2.14(1)
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Class 1 Counties:
E - 3.59P0'62
E = 17.31P0,16
P<30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
E = Emissions, lbs/hr
P = Process weight, tons/hr
New Jersey 7:27-6.2
Class 2 Counties:
E = 4.10P°'6 7
E = 55.0P° * 11-40
E = 3.59P°"6 2
E = 17.31P°'16
E - 4.10P°'6 7
E = 55.OP0' M-40
E - 4.10P°"6 7
E = 55.0P® * 1*-40
E = 4.10P°'6 7
E = 55.0P°'11-40
E - 4.10P°'6 7
E = 55.0P°"1*-40
0.02 gr/scf
P£30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
P£30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
POO tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
P£30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
P£30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
P£30 tons/hr
P>30 tons/hr
New York
2.3.3
Found from Process Weight Rate Table
24
-------
TABLE 4.0-1 (Cont.d)
GOVERNMENT
ENTITY
REGULATION
NUMBER
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
Ohio
EP11-11
E =
4.10P°'6 7
P^30 tons/hr
E =
55.0P0,11-40
P>30 tons/hr
Oregon
21-040
E =
4.504P°"6 7
P£0.65 tons/hr
E =
4.14P0"552
0.6530 tons/hr
Pennsylvania
123.13
(1)
0.02 gr/scf,
or
(2)
E = 0.76(0.3W) °-
• 7 6
I
whichever is
greater
W =
Production rate,
tons/hr
South
Standard No.
5
E -
4.10P° *6 7
Carolina
Section VII,
B
55.0P°'11-40
E =
Tennessee
Sec. 4
E =
4.10P°'6 7
P£30 tons/hr
E =
55.0P°'11-40
P>30 tons/hr
Texas
105.1
E -
0.048Q°'6 2
Q = Stack effluent rate, acfm
Washington WAC-18-04-060
0.2 gr/scfd
by July 1, 1975
0.1 gr/scfd
25
-------
GOVERNMENT
ENTITY
Washington
(Cont.d)
TABLE 4.0-1 (Cont'd)
REGULATION
NUMBER
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
9.07
E
=
4.12P0 *6 6 8
P<50 tons/hr
Puget Sound
8.344P0'*82
APA
E
s
50
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dealy, James 0., and Arthur M. Killin, Engineering
and Cost Study of the Ferroalloy Industry, EPA
450/2-74-008, North Carolina, May, 1974.
Environmental Protection Agency (Office of Air
Quality Planning & Standards), Standard Support
Document, "An Investigation of the Best Systems
of Emission Reduction for Electric Submerged Arc
Furnaces Producing Ferroalloys", Draft, Research
Triangle Park, N.C., 1974.
Environmental Protection Agency, Compilation of Air
Pollutant Emission Factors, 2nd Ed., with supplements,
AP-42, Research Triangle Park, N.C., 1973.
U. S. Bureau of Mines, Minerals Yearbook 1973, Vol. 1,
Metals, Minerals, and Fuels, Washington, D. C., 1974.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines,
Minerals Yearbook 1970, Vol. 1, Metals, Minerals,
and Fuels, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1972.
Vandergrift, A. E., et al., Particulate Pollutant System
Study, Volume 1, Mass Emissions, PB 203 128,
Contract No. CPA-22-69-104, Kansas City Missouri,
Midwest Research Institute, 1971.
27
-------
R D A CORPORATION
6.0 DATA SOURCES, SUMMARIES, AND TABLES OF INDIVIDUAL PLANTS
This section describes Radian's study of individual
ferroalloy plants which included data gathering, analysis, and
presentation.
6.1 Sources of Data
6.1.1 Processes and Emissions
The Minerals Yearbook was the most complete source of
ferroalloy plant locations and product type. Type and numbers of
furnaces and individual plant production were not available. The
National Emissions Data System (NEDS) was used to supplement the
Bureau of Mines, Minerals Yearbook data. A NEDS point source
listing for SIC 3313, created on 6 December 1974 was used.
6.1.2 Compliance Status
Three data sources were used in common for all EPA
regions: (1) a CDS Quick Look Report (QL) of compliance status
of all sources as of 8 May 1975, (2) a CDS QL report of all in-
crements of progress scheduled beyond 1974, and (3) a CDS Source
Data Report for SIC 3313 as of 19 December 1974.
All regional offices were contacted by phone to obtain
compliance status information not in CDS. Some regions had data
which was in the process of being added to CDS and was unavailable.
The following supplementary data was available and was used in
this study.
Region I - None
28
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
Region II - CDS Source Data Reports for all sources
as of 23 April 1975. Data was obtained
by visit to Regional Office on 23 April
1975.
Region III - None
Region IV - CDS Source Data Reports for all sources
and Semi-annual and Quarterly Reports from
the states in Region IV. This data was
available to Radian as a result of an on-
going contract with Region IV to update
CDS.
Region V - None
Region VI - CDS Source Data Reports for Louisiana and
Oklahoma and data from Texas Air Control
Board of compliance status of all sources
in the EMS system as of 30 April 1975.
Region VII - Status of all sources was obtained by visit
to RO on 21-23 April 1975.
Region VIII - Status of all sources as of 21 May 1975
was obtained by mail contact.
Region IX - The status of nine sources in neither NEDS
nor CDS was obtained over the phone. Status
was as of 23 May 1975.
Region X - None
29
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
6.2 Summaries of Emissions and Compliance Status
6.2.1 Emissions
No national totals of potential or actual emissions
could be calculated because of insufficient process and controls
data for individual sources. Another study estimated total parti-
culate emissions from the U.S. ferroalloy industry in 1967 to be
160,000 tons, consisting of 1,000 tons from blast furnaces, 150,000
tons from electric smelting furnaces, and 9,000 tons from materials
handling. An overall degree of control for the electric furnaces
was estimated to be 40 percent (VA-091).
6.2.2 Compliance Status
A summary of compliance status by region is presented
in Tables 6.2-la and b according to current CDS compliance status
codes as given in Table 2.6-2.
For the fifty-seven ferroalloy plants located in this
study, five (9%) were reported to be in compliance, nine (16%)
out of compliance, and forty-three (75%) unknown. These catagories
are subdivided as follows: three plants (5%) were in compliance
with emission limitations as determined by source test, inspec-
tion, or state certification, two plants (47») were in compliance
with the increments of progress of a schedule, three plants (5%)
were out of compliance with emission limitations, six plants (11%)
were out of compliance with the increments of progress of a
compliance schedule, twenty-four plants (42%) had unknown status
with respect to emission limitations, and nineteen plants (33%)
had unknown compliance with increments of progress of a schedule.
30
-------
RAD AN CORPORATION
TABLE 6.2-la
FERROALLOY PLANTS
CATEGORICAL SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE STATUS BY REGION
MAY,
1975
IN
OUT
UNKNOWN
REGION
IN COMPLIANCE
EMISSION LIMITATION
IH COMPLIANCE
WITH SCHEDULE
i
OUT OF COMPLIANCE
EMISSION LIMITATION
OUT OF COMPLIANCE
WITH SCHEDULE
(UNKNOWN COMPLIANCE
[EMISSION LIMITATION
UNKNOWN COMPLIANCE
WITH SCHEDULE
TOTAL
I
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
II
0
0
0
0
4 1
5
III
0
0
1
3
3 6
13
IV
0
0
0
0
9 11
20
V
0
2
0
0
6 1
9
VI
0
0
1
1
0 0
2
VII
0
0
0
1
0 0
1
VIII
0
0
1
0
0 0
1
IX
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
X
3
0
0
1
2 0
6
TOTAL
3
2
3
6
24 19
57
(5%) (47.)
(5%)
(11%)
(427o) (33%)
V
TOTAL
5
9
43
57
(9%)
(167o)
(75%)
31
-------
R D CORPORATION
TABLE 6.2-lb
EXISTING PRIMARY FERROALLOY PLANTS
SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE STATUS BY REGION
ENTIRE SOURCE
COMPLIANCE STATUS CODE*
MAY 1975
REGION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TOTAL
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
II
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
III
3
1
0
0
0
0
3
6
13
IV
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
20
V
6
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
9
VI
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
VII
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
VIII
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
IX
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
X
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
6
TOTALS
24
3
1
1
1
2
6
19
57
* Refer to Table 6.2-2
32
-------
GOEfJPOSZATZOM
TABLE 6.2-2
COMPLIANCE STATUS CODES
CODE DESCRIPTION
0 Unknown
1 Not in compliance - no schedule
2 In compliance - source test
3 In compliance - inspection
4 In compliance - certification
5 In compliance with increments of progress
6 Not in compliance with increments of progress
7 Unknown compliance with increments of progress
8 No applicable state regulation
9 Sources with potential emissions >100 TPY and <100 TPY
•actual emissions - compliance status unknown
-33-
-------
RAD A CORPORATION
6.3 Data Tables of Individual Sources
This section presents the data gathered for each
ferroalloy plant. The data for each source is presented in a
three-page format described below. A referencing system is used
to consecutively number the sources in each state according to
AQCR and county SAROAD number. The reference numbering system
starts at "1" for each state. The reference number is also used
to identify the source on PG 2/3 and PG 3/3.
PG 1/3 is an entire source (plant) summary of
company name, source location (city), AQCR
and particulate priority, SAROAD numbers,
NEDS, CDS, and state source identification
numbers, design and operating source pro-
duction rate in thousand tons of product
per year, and entire source compliance status
code (See Table 6.2-3). Data sources are
referenced by superscript footnotes. Com-
pliance status was extracted from CDS entire
source compliance status unless footnoted
otherwise. In those cases where the entire
source compliance status was found to be in-
consistent with the status of the individual
points, the proper CDS code for the entire
source was selected, entered, and footnoted.
If the source was listed in CDS with an SIC
code other than 3313, that SIC is presented
below the CDS source number.
PG 2/3 is a listing of point source processes (opera-
tions which have EPA emission factors), control
equipment, operating (production) rate from NEDS
34
-------
RAD A CORPORATION
in thousand tons per year (KTPY), total parti-
culate (FT) potential emissions at design
capacity and operating production rate, actual
particulate emissions, and allowable emissions
in pounds per hour (PPH) and tons per year (TPY)
both for design and operating conditions.
All data from NEDS is footnotes. Control
equipment codes used are listed in Appendix 1.
PG 3/3 is a listing of compliance status for individual
processes as found in CDS. Only compliance
schedules are presented which have final com-
pliance date of 1 January 1975 and beyond.
Any CDS points with schedules due before 1
January 1975 are presented in this report with
the designation "SCHEDULE EXPIRED BEFORE 1975."
Some CDS points with schedules were listed with
an improper compliance status code. In this
report these points have compliance status
code "7" with a footnote to show the actual code
found in CDS. Any entire source listed as in
compliance with emission limitations, i.e.,
codes 2, 3, or 4 will have all points in com-
pliance by definition. Compliance schedule
increments of progress are 01, plan submittal;
02, award contracts; 03, initiate construction;
04, complete construction; 05, final compliance.
Tables 6.3-1 to 6.3-16 are the tables of data for the fifty-
seven ferroalloy plants located in this study.
35
-------
RAD A CORPORATION
REGION II
TABLES 6.3-1 TO 6.3-2
-------
TABLE 6.3-1
SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
RE6I0N II INDUSTRY FERROALLOY gig 3313 state HEW JERSEY
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
PT
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
COMPLIANCE
6TATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Shieldalloy Corp
Newfield
045/1
31
1760
00020
SIC
33990
72
FOOTNOTES: l
NEDS data
2 Listed as 1 in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-1 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
region II industry FERROALLOY 3313 state NEW JERSEY PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCfUPTIDN
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
OESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Alumino thermic
Furnace2
footnotes i nedS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
^ 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-1 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
II industry FERROALLOY
RIP.
3313
STATF NEW JERSEY
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
»-
z
<
t-
3
_l
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
1
Rotary Kiln Stack
PT
002
7
07/31/75
footnotes;
i
10
00
1
-------
TABLE 6.3-2
SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
5E6I0N ^ industry FERROALLOY SiC 3313 state NEW YORK
EFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
SAROAD C0DIN6
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
IMPLIANCE
STATUS
-------
TABLE 6.3-2 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
region 11 industry FERROALLOY RIC 3313 state NEW YORK pg 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NEDS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
2
3
4
Blast Furnace11
2 30MW Furnaces
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
PT
PT
FOOTNOTES x jjEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
* Minerals Yearbook 1972
-------
TABLE 6.3-2 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
II imhiistrv FERROALLOY
Rir 3313
rtatf NEW YORK
PG3/3
LFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
t-
z
<
t-
3
_l
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
cc
a.
01
02
03
04
05
i
No Data
2
No Data
3
No Data
4
No Data
footnotes:
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
REGION III
TABLES 6.3-3 TO 6.3-4
-------
TABLE 6.3-3 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
SE6I0N
III industry FERROALLOY
«.r 3313
state PENNSYLVANIA
PG 1/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AOCR/
PRIOHITY
3AR0AD CODING
NUMBERB
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
(MPUAN0E
8TATUS
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
W
O
1
Reading Alloys
Robesonia
151/1
39
0720
00026
SIC
3339
6
2
New Jersey Zinc Co
Palmerton
151/1
39
1380
6940
00003
NO SIC
7
3
Kawecki Chem Co
Easton
151/1
39
6580
2720
0
4
Mercer Alloys
Pymatung
178/1
39
5660
00010
7 3
5
Bethlehem Steel Corp
Johnstown
195/1
39
1300
4460
00006
SIC
3312
7 2
6
U.S. Steel Corp
Clairton
197/1
39
0100
1720
00032
73
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
2 Listed as 0 in CDS
3 Listed as 1 in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-3 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION III INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
sTiTF PENNSYLVANIA
PG 2/3
Ul
o _
z a
£5 w
IT ®
5 2
POINT SOURCE
K
Z
<
CONTROL
NE08
POINT
DESCRIPTION
3
j
EQUIPMENT-
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
h. 3
Ul Z
-1
o
EFFICIENCY1
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
K
Q.
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Aluminothermic
Furnace2
PT
2
Electric Furnace2
PT
3
Alumino thermic
Furnace2
PT
4
No Data
5
Blast Furnace2
PT
6
Blast Furnace2
PT
FOOTNOTES 1 jjeds
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-3 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
111 INDUSTRY FERROALLOY S(C 3313 STATE PENNSYLVANIA p
-------
TABLE 6.3-3
POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION I" INDUSTRY FERROALLOY S|C 3313 STATE PENNSYLVANIA
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
V-
z
<
t-
ra
_i
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
5
Cont
3 Open Hearth Furnaces
5 Open Hearth Furnaces
5 Open Hearth Furnaces
Burning Operation
Burning Operation
Open Hearth Leaded Steel
Open Hearth Leaded Steel
035
040
045
050
055
060
065
7 1
71
71
7l
71
7*
DO
DO
DO
01/01/75
DO
06/01/75
DO
01/05/75
DO
02/01/76
DO
03/05/75
DO
05/01/76
DO
09/03/75
DO
DO
11-01/78
DO
07/01/76
DO
10/01/75
DO
6
Storage Tanks
Coke Oven Gas Combustion
Coke Oven Gas Underfiring
Claus Sulfur Recov Plant
062
071
081
091
V
V
V
V
03/01/75
05/15/75
05/15/75
02/01/75
DO
DO
footnotes: i Listed as 1 in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-3 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
III imdiistrv FERROALLOY
o.r 3313
state PENNSYLVANIA
PG 1/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AOCR/
PRIORITY
3AR0AD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
IMPUAN0E
6TATUS
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
u
o
7
U.S. Steel Corp.
McKeesport
197/1
39
0100
5380
00011
1
8
Climax Molybdenum
Langeloth
197/1
39
9200
00044
NO SIC
6
9
Molybdenum Corp. of
America
Washington
197/1
39
9200
9190
00026
6
FOOTNOTES* j
NEDS data
i
-p-
ON
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-3 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION 111 INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
8TATF PENNSYLVANIA
PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
t-
2
<
CONTROL
NEDS
POINT
DESCRIPTION
3
EQUIPMENT-
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
-1
O
EFFICIENCY 1
POTENTIAL
OESIGN
OPER
&
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
7
Blast Furnace2
PT
8
Aluminothermic2
Furnace
PT
9
Electric & Alumino-
thermic Furnace2
PT
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-3
POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION 111 industry FERROALLOY SIC 3313 STATE PENNSYLVANIA
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
7
No Data
8
6 Herreschoff Roasters
Oil
7 1
03/19/75
9
No Data
footnotes:
1 Listed as 1 in CDS
i
-p-
CO
i
-------
TABLE 6.3-4 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
SE6I0N TIT INDUSTRY FERROALLOY SIC 3313 STATE WEST VIRGINIA
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
PT
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
C0MPLIAN0E
STATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Foote Mineral Co
103/1
50
1060
0004
00004
72
New Haven
2
Union Carbide Corp
234/1
50
0460
0001
00001
7 2
Alloy
SIC
3312
3
Foote Mineral Corp.
235/1
50
0980
0
Graham
4
Diamond Shamrock
235/1
50
1520
0820
0
Kingwood
FOOTNOTES! x
NEDS data
2 Listed as 0 J.n CDS
I
-!>•
vO
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-4 POINT EMISSIONS - EXISTING SOURCES
RE<
ilOM HI
INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
fiic 3313
ST ATP WEST
VTRRTNTA
PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NEDS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
0ESIGN
OPER
0ESI6N
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
17500
175
Electric
Furnace 2
PT
None
5840
58
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
3400
34
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
5550
56
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
526
5
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
438
6
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
692
12
2
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1310
13
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1310
13
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1100
28
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
4710
47
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
3150
47
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1770
26
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
3500
35
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
516
101
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
3070
31
Electric
Furnace2
PT
NOne
5740
57
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
5740
57
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1310
13
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
1420
110
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
810
8
Electric
Furnace2
PT
None
394
66
footnotes i jjeds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-4 POINT EMISSIONS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION HI INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
«,r 3313
statf WEST VIRGINIA
PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
»-
as
<
CONTROL
NED8
POINT
DESCRIPTION
3
_>
o
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
a
KTPY
DESI6N
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
3
Electric Furnace2
PT
4
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
i 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
in
l
-------
TABLE 6.3-4 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
III industry FERROALLOY
3313
ctatf WEST VIRGINIA
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
CDS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
#3 Furnace (10 MUA)
020
7 1
06/01/75
#3 Furnace (10 MUA)
025
7 1
DO
#6 Furnace (10 MUA)
040
7 1
DO
#6 Furnace (10 MUA)
045
7 1
DO
2
Furnace #13
210
7 2
01/01/75
Furnace #13
215
72
DO
Furnace #13 Tap Hole
220
72
DO
Furnace #13 Tap Hole
225
72
DO
Furnace #16
270
72
DO
Furnace #16
275
72
DO
3
No Data
4
No Data
footnotes; iListed as 1 in CDS
2Listed as 0 in CDS
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
REGION IV
TABLES 6.3-5 TO 6.3-10
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV indii&trv FERROALLOY
«,r 3313
state ALABAMA
PG 1/3
til
o «r
AQCR/
SAROAD CODIN6
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
IaI
SOURCE
NUMBER8
RATE-
-KTPY
^ ^ J
k2i-
3 -1 <
ui 3
u. 5
iii *
LOCATION
PRIORITY
e
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEOS
COS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
o
o
1
Alabama Metallurgical
Corp
Selma
001/11
01
1000
3020
0001
0.4
0
2
Woodward Iron Co
Woodward
004/1
01
1980
0440
00440
13.0
7
3
Airco Alloys & Carbide
Theodore
005/1
01
2400
8001
08001
00014
79.0
7
4
Tennessee Valley
Authority
Muscle Shoals
007/1
01
0800
2560
0
5
Union Carbide Corp
Sheffield
007/1
01
0800
3040
0009
00019
6.3
0
6
Tennessee Alloys Corp
Bridgeport
007/1
01
1920
0460
00007
SIC
3339
0
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
RE<
SION IV INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
§ALABAMA
PG 2/3
1 REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NEDS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Furnace 9
PT
None
0.4
168
8
2
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
13.0
854
15
3
Electric Arc Fur-
PT
WS
79.0
73
61
nace1
98.0%
4
Electric Furnace2
PT
5
Electric Furnace2
PT
WS
6.3
705
57
98.0%
6
Electric Furnace2
footnotes i Neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
" 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV
INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
SIC
3313
STATE
ALABAMA
PG3/3
O OS,
z «
ul (B
as 3
U 3
u. z
ui
a
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
3
-J
o
a.
COS
POINT
o
w
Z T*-
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
No Data
Ferosilicon Elec Fnc
Crushing & Sizing
No Data
No Data
No Data
PT
PT
002
901
SCHEDULE EXPIRED
SCHED
JLE EXPIRED
BEFORE 197!
BEFORE 197f
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
QPcmu TV industry FERROALLOY 3313 state ALABAMA PG 1/s
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
PT
SAROAO CODING
NUUBER8
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
7
Ohio Ferro Alloy2
Montgomery
002/1
01
2480
2460
0
FOOTNOTES: j
NEDS data
2 New plant under construction, on line in 1976
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
rfgiom IV industry FERROALLOY Rir 3313 state ALABAMA PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY 1
NEOS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESI6N
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
7
No Data
FOOTNOTES i neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
Oi
t
-------
TABLE 6.3-5 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV industry FERROALLOY
co 3313
STATF
ALAMABA
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
i-
z
<
t-
3
-1
-1
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
Q.
01
02
03
04
05
7
No Data
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-6 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV ikiniifiTov FERROALLOY
state FLORIDA
PG 1/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE—KTPY
ui
M S CO
o|a
ac - i-
3 -> <
£!£
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
a
1
Florida Machine & Fory
Jacksonville
049/1
10
1080
1960
0033
9.1
0
2
Stauffer Chem Co
Tarpon Springs
052/1
10
3600
4380
00042
NO SIC
7
3
Agrico Chem Co
Pierce
052/1
10
3680
00054
NO SIC
7
4
Mobil Chem Co
Nichols
052/1
10
3680
00047
NO SIC
7
FOOTNOTES: ,
NEDS data
-------
TABLE 6.3-6 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION IV INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
STATE FLORIDA
PG 2/3
lil
U _
5 jjj
IC ®
m 2
POINT SOURCE
~-
z
<
CONTROL
NEDS
POINT
DESCRIPTION
-J
-J
Q-
EQUIPMENT-
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
*»• ^
Ui 2
EFFICIENCY1
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
o.
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Furnace3
PT
BH
99.5%
9.1
1
12
2
Electric Furnace2
PT
3
No Data
4
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes i Neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-6 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV iMnnsTRY FERROALLOY
air 3313
rt&tf FLORIDA
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
No Data
2
Dodolizing Kiln
PT
003
7 1
04/04/75
06/01/75
Kiln Off Gas Scrubber
PT
004
7 1
DO
DO
Phosphorus Furnace
PT
008
7 1
DO
DO
Bunker C Fuel Boiler
S2
009
7 1
DO
DO
3
Phos Complex
PT
001
7 1
05/04/75
07/01/75
4
Phos Rock Calciner
PT
003
7 1
05/04/75
07/01/75
Phos Rock Calciner
PT
004
7 1
DO
DO
footnotes:
Listed as 1 in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-7 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
uFGinm IV industiiv FERROALLOY 3313 state KENTUCKY PG |/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
PT
3AR0AD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPV
SOURCE
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Airco Alloy & Carbide
Calvert City
072/1
18
2600.
0002
00002
SIC
3312
168.0
7
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
-------
TABLE 6.3-7 POINT EMISSIONS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV
INDUSTRY FERROALLOY
SIC
3313
STATE KRMTTinfY
PG 2/3
z
bl
IE
Ul
h.
ui
K
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
<
»-
3
O
a
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY 1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
ACTUAL
SIP ALLOWABLES
DESIGN
PPH
TPY
OPER
PPH
TPY
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Furnace2
Furnace2
Furnace2
Furnace2
Furnace2
Furnace2
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
None
None
None
None
None
None
18.3
33.6
65.7
16.8
16.8
16.8
3710
1970
1970
1970
8300
9610
67
105
127
61
61
61
FOOTNOTES i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
, 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
CT\
u>
-------
TABLE 6.3-7 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV industry FERROALLOY
ftir
3313
ctatf KENTUCKY
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
»-
z
<
t-
=>
_j
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
1
Alloy Furnace 15
Alloy Furnace 16
PT
PT
009
010
7 1
7 1
04/01/75
DO
04/01/75
DO
footnotes; j Listed as i in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-8
SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
QPcinti IV inoubtpy FERROALLOY «ir 3313 STAtf SOUTH CAROLINA pc
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AOCR/
PRIORITY
PT
SAROAD CODING
NUUBER8
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE—KTPT
SOURCE
compliance
STATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Airco Alloys & Carbide
Charleston
199/1
42
0560
0540
0018
447-0
0
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
I
o\
in
i
-------
TABLE 6.3-8 POINT EMISSIONS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION IV industry FERROALLOY air 3313 state SOUTH nAROT.TNA PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
OESIGN
OPER
0ESI6N
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
ESP
99.0%
ESP
99.07.
219.0
228.0
137
33
155
159
FOOTNOTES i jjeDs data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-8 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV INDUSTRY FERROALLOY
sir. 3313
ST4TF SOUTH CAROLINA
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
H
Z
4
V—
3
J
-1
cos
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
1
No Data
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
RE6I0N
IV industry FERROALLOY
3313
state TENNESSEE
PG 1/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
SAROAD CODING
NUUBER8
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
UJ
uiSn
OJ3
3
2 £ *~
CO X CD
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
o
o
1
Tennessee Metallurg-
ical Co
Kimball
007/1
44
2220
0005
00005
64.8
7
2
Chromium Mining &
Smelting
Woodstock
018/1
44
3080
0521
00521
SIC
3339
7
3
Roane Electric
Rockwood
207/1
44
2880
2920
0011
00011
7
4
Woodward Iron Co
Rockwood
207/1
44
2880
2920
0
5
Hooker Chem Corp
Columbia
208/1
44
2300
0580
0
6
Monsanto Chem Co
Columbia
208/1
44
2300
0580
00006
SIC
2819
7
FOOTNOTES: x
NEDS data
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
RE<
3ION IV INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
*.r 3313
STATE TRNNRSSER
PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESI6N
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
4.6
1850
630
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
A.6
450
440
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
4.6
1850
630
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
25.5
860
840
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
25.5
860
750
2
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
1600
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
1600
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
1600
3
Furnace9
PT
None
237
37
Furnace3
PT
None
1
Furnace 3
PT
None
257
37
Furnace3
PT
None
1400
38
Furnace3
PT
None
1350
38
Furnace3
PT
None
1370
38
Furnace3
PT
None
1370
38
Furnace3
PT
None
1350
38
Furnace3
PT
None
400
4
Electric Furnace2
PT
5
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes i Neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
i 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
<7*
SO
l
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION IV INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
state TENNESSEE
PG 2/3
CONT'D .
IaJ
o
z
oc
Ul
POINT SOURCE
K
Z
<
CONTROL
NED8
POINT
c
m
*
DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
tk
til
K
3
Z
O
POTENTIAL
0ESI6N
OPER
a
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
6
Electric Furnace2
PT
FOOTNOTES i neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
^ 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
0
1
-------
TABLE 6.3-9
POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
_UL
INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
SIC
3313
STATE TENNESSEE
PG3/3
uj ^
o ce.
z y
UJ CD
a: 3
Ui Z3
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
<
Y-
3
O
O-
CDS
POINT
hi
°co
•- 4 =>
Z^(-
OtJ
o
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
OS
Furn No.
Furn No.
Furn No.
Furn No,
Furn No.
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
No Data
No Data
1-Stil No. 3
1-Stil No. 4
1-Stil No. 5
2-Stil No. 9
2-Stil No. 10
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Fnc-Metal
Alloy 1
Alloy 2
Alloy 3
Alloy 4
Alloy 5
Alloy 6
Alloy 7
Alloy
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
003
004
005
008
009
001
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
009
DO
DO
DO
DO
SCHEDULE EXP II
DO
DO
DO
DO
ED BEFORE
DO
DO
DO
DO
SCHEDULE EXPIIED BEFORE
SC IEDULE EXPIIED BEFORE
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
1975
DO
DO
DO
DO
1975
1975
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
DO
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV iNmisTRY FERROALLOY
ftir 3313
ct atp TENNESSEE
P63/3
CONT'D
REFERENCE
NUMBER
CDS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
6
#i Nodulizing Kiln
S2
006
7
05/01/75
07/01/75
#2 Nodulizing Kiln
S2
007
7
DO
DO
#3 Kiln Discharge
S2
008
7
DO
DO
footnotes;
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
qpcian IV, industry FERROALLOY ftir 3313 state TENNESSEE pg 1/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIOHITY
PT
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE—KTPY
SOURCE
C0MPLIAN0E
STATUS
8TATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
7
Stauffer Chem Co
Mt. Pleasant
208/1
44
2300
2500
00009
SIC
2819
7
FOOTNOTES: j
NEDS data
u>
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
RFeiou IV industry FERROALLOY ftlft 3313 state TENNESSEE PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY 1
NEOS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
7
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-9 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
IV
ikiniifiTBv ferroalloy
3313
ctatc TENNESSEE
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
CDS
POINT DESCRIPTION
i-
z
<
i-
=>
_i
-i
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
7
No Data
footnotes:
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
REGION V
TABLE 6.3-10
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
V industry FERROALLOY
«ir. 3313
STATE OHIO
PG 1/3
U!
" OC
Z u
£ s
AQCR/
SAROAD CODING
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
bl
•n 2 m
SOURCE
NUUBER8
RATE-
-KTPV
v 3
tc 5 K
3 J<
CC S <0
w a
w 5
u *
s
LOCATION
PRIORITY
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
o
o
1
Union Carbide Corp
Ashtabula
178/11
36
0220
0200
0014
00014
550.0
5
2
Interlake Steel Corp
Beverly
179/1
36
7100
0
3
Union Carbide Corp
Marietta
179/1
36
7100
3920
0016
00016
871.8
5
4
Ohio Ferro Alloy Corp
Powhatan
181/1
36
0540
0
5
Ohio Ferro Alloy Corp
Canton
181/1
36
1440
1000
0033
27.0
0
6
Foote Mineral
Steubenville (Vanco-
ram)
181/1
36
3160
806.0
0
FOOTNOTES* j
NEDS data
I
-J
ON
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-1® POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REI
SION V
INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
•m 3313
ST ATE OHIO
PG 2/3
Ul
o _
2 a
tc ®
lit z
* §
Ul z
c
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NEDS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric
Furnace1
PT
WS
51.8
99.0%
Electric
Furnace1
PT
WS
123.0
99.0%
Electric
Furnace
PT
WS
49.5
99.0%
Electric
Furnace
PT
WS
33.1
99.0%
Electric
Furnace
PT
WS
146.0
98.4%
Electric
Furnace1
PT
WS
38.0
99.0%
Electric
Furnace1
PT
WS
43.8
99.0%
Electric
Furnace1
PT
WS
64.8
99.0%
2
Electric
Furnace2
PT
3
Electric
Furnace2
PT
WS
156.0
59
98.6%
Electric
Furnace2
PT
WS
55.0
1010
80.0%
FOOTNOTES 1 data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
, 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION JV INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
sic 3313
STATE OHIO
PG 2/3
CONT'D
bl
* £
tc ®
¦L 2
POINT SOURCE
~-
z
<
CONTROL
NED8
POINT
DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
"¦ I
bl 2
K
_)
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
0.
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
3
cont
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
WS
93.6%
US
95.07o
US
95.9%
US
97.0%
US
95.2%
US
95.7%
US
95.7%
US
93.0%
US
80.0%
61 .5
43.8
43.9
36.8
47.5
45.8
177.0
79.5
125.0
392
179
180
122
230
200
77
58
255
4
Electric Furnace2
PT
5
Furnace3
PT
BH
99.0%
27.0
55
FOOTNOTES i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
i 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
CO
i
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION V INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
fttc 3313
STATE OHIO
PG 2/3
CONT'D
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
~-
z
4
CONTROL
NEDS
POINT
DESCRIPTION
_J
o
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
Q-
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
6
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
806.0
42800
footnotes i jjedS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
vo
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
V iwnnsTRY FERROALLOY
3313
STaTF OHIO
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
No Data
2
No Data
3
No Data
4
No Data
5
No Data
6
No Data
FOOTNOTES."
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
V industry FERROALLOY
air. 3313
STATE OHIO
PG 1/3
Ul
O K
Z Ql
SOURCE
AQCR/
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
LJ
O f O
lit-
1*1 3
u 5
LOCATION
PRIORITY
9 «
w 2 (D
c
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
o
o
7
Ohio Ferro Alloy Corp
Brilliant
181/1
36
3160
0010
69.0
0
8
Foote Mineral Co
Cambridge
183/11
36
2680
0940
0
9
Ohio Ferro-Alloy
Philo (Wapakoneta)
183/11
36
4640
7000
0010
00010
7 2
FOOTNOTES: j
NEDS data
2 Listed as 1 in CDS
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION V INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
3313
STATE OHIO
PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
»-
2
<
CONTROL
NED8
POINT
DESCRIPTION
3
J
-1
EQUIPMENT-
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
EFFICIENCY1
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
a
KTPY
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
7
Electric Furnace2
PT
None
69.0
6890
8
Electric Furnace2
PT
9
Electric Furnace2
PT
FOOTNOTES l jjj;Ds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
w 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-10 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
V .mhiistrv FERROALLOY
... 3313
RTATF
OHIO
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
7
No Data
8
No Data
9
P001 Arc Furnace #18
010
07/01/75
P002 Arc Furnace #16
020
7 '
DO
P003 Arc Furnace #11
030
7 1
DO
P004 Arc Furnace #13
040
7 1
DO
P007 Arc Furnace #12
050
7 1
DO
P008 Arc Furnace #15
060
7 1
DO
P018 Plunging Room
070
7 1
DO
footnotes; ,
Listed as 0 in CDS
-------
REGION VI
TABLE 6.3-11
-------
TABLE 6.3-11 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
VT industry FERROALLOY
*,r. 3313
STATE TEXAS
PG 1/3
tal
»
-------
TABLE 6V3-11 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION ^ INDUSTRY FERROALLOY S|C 3313 STATE TEXAS PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
i
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY 1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
2
No Data
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
c> 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
Ui
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-11 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
VI industry FERROALLOY
sir
3313
STATF .
TEXAS
PG3/3
u „
o 0£
z y
Ul CQ
CC 2
ul 3
U- Z
111
oe
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
»-
z
4
V-
3
-1
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
Q.
01
02
03
04
05
i
l1
2
61
footnotes:
1 State Office
-------
RADI N CORPORATION
REGION VII
TABLE 6.3-12
-------
TABLE 6.3-12 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
QPcmN VII industry FERROALLOY S(r 3313 STATE IOWA pG |/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
PT
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Foote Mineral Co
Keokuk
065/1
16
2240
0045
0010
00003
SIC
3312
239.0
6
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
i
03
-------
TABLE 6.3-12 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
RFGIOM VII INDUSTRY FERROALLOY Rir 3313 STATE IOWA PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
»—
z
4
~"
3
_»
O
a
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NEDS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
PT
41.0
83.0
115.0
6460-
13100
18100
80
105
footnotes i nedS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
, 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
CO
CO
-------
TABLE 6.3-12 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
VII luniiRTRv FERROALLOY
3313
STATF IOWA
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEOULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
Furnace No. 9
6
03/01/74
06/01/74
10/01/74
06/01/75
06/01/75
Kish Handling Facility #9
6
03/01/74
06/01/74
10/01/74
06/01/75
06/01/75
Kish Handling Facility #1C
6
03/01/74
06/01/74
10/01/74
06/01/75
06/01/75
footnotes;
i
OO
v£>
I
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
REGION VIII
TABLE 6.3-13
-------
TABLE 6.3-13 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
qreiflN VIII indii&try FERROALLOY Rir 3313 state MONTANA pc ,/3
Ul
o a
z ui
u> m
K 3
* 3
u z
tet *
e
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIOHITY
PT
SAROAD COOING
NUUBER8
SOURCE ID NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
COMPLIANCE
6TATUS
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NED8
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
1
Stauffer Chem Co
Silver Bow
142/IA
27
1480
0005
00005
SIC
2819
1
FOOTNOTES? j,
NEDS data
-------
TABLE 6.3-13POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE-EXISTING SOURCES
rfgioh VIII industry FERROALLOY ftie 3313 state MONTANA PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRJPTLON
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY
NEOS
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER
ACTUAL
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY
1
Electric Furnace2
PT
footnotes 1 NEDS Data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook - 1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-13 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
RFfiinN VIII industry FERROALLOY eir 3313 statf MONTANA
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
No Data
footnotes:
-------
RADIAN CORPORATION
REGION X
TABLES 6.3-14 TO 6.3-16
-------
TABLE 6.3-14 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
_JL— INDUSTRY _
FERROALLOY
*.r. 3313
STATE IDAHO
PG 1/3
in
o «t
2 u
£ ®
K s
u) •
u. 5
u z
e
SOURCE
LOCATION
AQCR/
PRIORITY
SAROAD CODING
NUUBER8
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
80URCE
IMPLIAN0E
6TATUS
PT
8TATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
u
O
1
FMC Corp
Focatello
061/1
13
0080
1240
0005
00005
NO SIC
0
2
Monsanto Chem Co
Soda Springs
061/1
13
0420
1430
0001
00001
SIC
2819
2
FOOTNOTES: i
NEDS data
V0
U>
I
-------
TABLE 6.3-14 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION X INDUSTRY FERROALLOY S|C 3313 STATE IDAHO PG 2/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
NED8
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
OESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
^ 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-p-
-------
TABLE 6.3-14 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
^ iwniiftTRY FERROALLOY
3313
STATF __
IDAHO
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
K
Z
<
t-
3
-X
cos
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a
01
02
03
04
05
I
No Data
2
ALL
2
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-15 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
RE6I0N
X imoustry FERROALLOY
*.r 3313
state OREGON
PG 1/3
HI
o K
Z |J
SOURCE
AQCR/
8AR0AD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
jmpliance
STATUS
y> 5
u. 5
111 z
e
LOCATION
PRIORITY
PT
STATE
COUNTY
CITY
NED8
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
O
1
Union Carbide Corp
Portland
193/1
38
1240
1460
1873
10004
SIC
3323
3
2
Hanna Nickel Smelting
Co
Riddle
194/11
38
0520
0007
00033
SIC
3339
4
FOOTNOTES: j
NEDS data
i
vO
CT*
-------
TABLE 6.3-15 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
rfgiom X industry FERROALLOY 3313 state OREGON pe 2/3
U1
z a
5 £
rr ©
5 *
<>• 5
tu z
ec
POINT SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CONTROL
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY 1
NE08
POINT
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
KTPY
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
POTENTIAL
ACTUAL1
DESIGN
OPER
DESIGN
OPER 1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
2
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
footnotes i neds data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
i 3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6.3-15 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
X imdiirtry FERROALLOY
sir.
3313
otatc OREGON
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
CDS POINT DESCRIPTION
V-
z
<.
1-
3
-1
_l
COS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
a.
01
02
03
04
05
I
ALL
3
2
ALL
4
footnotes:
-------
TABLE 6.3-16 SOURCE SUMMARY - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
X industry FERROALLOY
air 3313
state WASHINGTON
PG 1/3
u
O £E
z ui
ui m
K «
SOURCE
AQCR/
SAROAD CODING
NUMBERS
SOURCE ID
NUMBERS
SOURCE PRODUCTION
RATE-KTPY
SOURCE
IMPLIAN0E
STATUS
Id •
U. ^
tot Z
e
LOCATION
PRIORITY
PT
8TATE
COUNTY
CITY
NEDS
CDS
STATE
DESIGN
OPER 1
u
O
1
Foote Mineral Co
Wenatchee2
227/11
49
0520
2340
0001
00001
29.5
6
2
Ohio Ferro Alloy Co
Tacoma
229/11
49
1560
2140
0004
00004
0
FOOTNOTES: x
NEDS data
2
Listed in CDS as Hanna Mining Co, Rock Island (East of Wenatchee)
-------
TABLE 6.3-16 POINT EMISSIONS AND ALLOWABLE - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION X INDUSTRY
FERROALLOY
ric 3313
state WASHINGTON
PG 2/3
lil
s *
* £
tr ©
UI 2
POINT SOURCE
t-
z
<
CONTROL
NEDS
POINT
DESCRIPTION
3
-1
o
EQUIPMENT-
EFFICIENCY1
SOURCE
OPER
RATE
EMISSIONS - TPY
SIP ALLOWABLES
^ 5
ftU z
c
POTENTIAL
DESIGN
OPER
a.
KTPV
DESIGN
OPER 1
ACTUAL1
PPH
TPY
PPH
TPY 1
1
Electric Furnace2
Electric Furnace2
PT
PT
None
None
12.5
17.0
7150
10800
17900
17900
2
Furnace9
PT
GC, BH
99.0%
132
148
footnotes i NEDS data
2 Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbook-1973
3 Type of Furnace Unknown
-------
TABLE 6,3-16 POINT COMPLIANCE STATUS - EXISTING SOURCES
REGION
X ihintifiTPv FERROALLOY
sir 3313
qtatf WASHINGTON
PG3/3
REFERENCE
NUMBER
COS POINT DESCRIPTION
POLLUTANT
CDS
POINT
POINT
COMPLIANCE
STATUS
COMPLIANCE SCHEOULE
INCREMENTS OF PROGRESS
01
02
03
04
05
1
Furnaces 1,2, & 3
PT
001
6
05/10/74
10/31/74
05/31/75
06/30/75
Furnace 4
ALL
4
2
No Data
footnotes:
-------
APPENDIX 1
CONTROL EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CODES
-------
CONTROL EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CODES
CODE
EQUIPMENT
WS
Wet Scrubber
GC
Gravity Collector
CYCL
Centrifugal Collector
ESP
Electrostatic Precipitator
GS
Gas Scrubber
MIST ELIM
Mist Eliminator
BH
Fabric Filter
CAT
Catalytic Afterburner
INCIN
Direct Flame Afterburner
HES
High Energy Scrubber
------- |