A (Vftfottaf
OlIPJUHtli!
Prepared by
INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
For The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Water Quality and Non-Point Source Control
Water Quality Protection Branch
Of EmUnq
CoaM
Ufafe/i
Qaaffi
Mwitmwf
-------
Phase A
Report 445-A
Dec. 6, 1972
A NATIONAL OVERVIEW
OF
EXISTING COASTAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Prepared for the
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY AND NON-POINT SOURCE CONTROL
WATER QUALITY PROTECTION BRANCH
Contract No. 68-01-0160
Prepared by:
INTERSTATE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
OceanicS Division
707 East Vermont Avenue. Post Office Bo* 3117, Anaheim, California 92803 Telephone 714-772-2811
-------
PI OGHAM SUM 1ARY
FOR HIE
NATIONAL COASTAL VKTLK QUALITY fCUITORIIJG IflJTWDKK PLAN
Flow Diagram - 445 presents tne relationship arid perspective of the nine
separate documents wliich were prepared under this task; the large arrow
points to tne specific report wiiich is within tiiis cover.
The task to design a national Coastal Water Quality Monitoring itetwork
Plan was divided into tiiree piiases: Pliase A, National Overview of
Monitoring Resources; Piiase B, Case Study Areas; and Piiase C, tlie
iJational Coastal liater CMality Monitoring Network Plan tasks.
Information frcaa PiLases A and li cofiprise a partial "data base" for input
into tlie Piiase C Final l-a presents a national overview of tlie monitoring
activities, facilities and capabilities for monitoring, representative
organization structures, and inventories of potential pollution and
qwsociai-uei.ograpiiie statistics. This report presents sortie
relationships between pollution causing factors and monitoring
activities.
PIuwjL. Li Ciwb L iLui
Hiuse li reports contain spoolfications for ininediate irrplernentation of a
cooruinated monitoring plan for a local area. Reports 44b-B and 445-B1
tmuugii 4<»L>-bb were generated using information gathered from cognizant
individuals and organizatiuns in eacii case study area, 'llie approach was
to estaivlisii personal contact witii tiiese sources to develop a
coordinated plan for utiiizatiai of existing monitoring activities and
capabilities.
pij/\sl c iiATiaiAL coaxial wkilk quality nmrroiauG iJUivjcm; plan
The Piiase c Final Import No, 441j-C is a plan for a national Coastal
Water CMality lionitoring Network, The plan relies lieavily can the "Data
Bases" of Piiase A and b reports. Piiase C presents tlie conponents for a
water quality in fori; at ion system, of wliich the National Water Quality
Monitoring iietwork Plan is a subsystem. This subsystem of Phase C is
structured in two steps s (1) An Initial Plan wliich can be irrv>lemcnted
immediately utilizing existing activities, facilities and resources, and
U) a growth plan utilizing tlie invlementation of case study areas and
integrating tliern stepwise into a National Network.
Note: Information presented is current as of January 1, 1972.
i
-------
PROGRAM SUMMARY FOR THE
NATIONAL COASTAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK-PLAN
PHASE A
NATIONAL
OVERVIEW
{COASTAL ZONE)
WORKING DOCUMEN
REPORT 445-A
NITORING ACTIVITIES
RY INFORMATION
PHASE B
OREGON-WASHINGTON
COAST REPORT
CASE STUDY AREAS
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS
WORKING DOCUMENT
REPORT 445-B
B2
S. F. BAY-COAST REPORT
PENSACOLA BAY REPORT
BISCAYNE BAY REPORT
CHARLESTON HARBOR REPORT
B1
N.Y. BIGHT REPORT
PHASE C
NATIONAL COASTAL
WATER QUALITY
MONITORING NETWORK
INITIAL NETWORK PLAN
PLAN
GROWTH NETWORK PLAN
FINAL REPORT
445-C
ii
FLOW DIAGRAM - 445
-------
ABSTRACT
An overview of coastal water quality monitoring activity is presented,
including an examination of related factors such as water quality standards,
population, waste discharges, ocean dumping, a survey of data banks at
the national level and others. This broadly based information, supported
by detailed Phase B data from selected "case study" areas, will be used
in the formulation of a national plan for monitoring coastal water quality
(Phase C).
Comparison with detailed survey data from the six case study areas of
Phase B revealed a considerably higher number of active monitoring sta-
tions than was apparent from the national inventory. This difference in
information was used to extrapolate to a level of monitoring in the coastal
zone, which is probably more realistic.
Data from several inventories pertinent to coastal zone water quality is
summarized to the state and EPA regional level with extensive descrip-
tions contained in appendices.
In general, no significant correlative relationship was found between
monitoring activities and any of the other factors studied. However, a
large amount of data was accumulated, summarized and presented in a
form useful in the future management and planning of coastal zone water
quality monitoring networks.
iii
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This National Overview has been made possible through the cooperation
received from all parties contacted. It is impossible to list all federal
and state personnel who have contributed to this effort; however, special
credit is warranted for the following agencies and personnel:
The Environmental Protection Agency
Water Quality Protection Branch Chief, T. A. Wastler and his
scientific staff, including in particular William Davis, William Musser,
Robert Johnson, Barbara Wygal, Paul Thorpe, and Denise Swink, all
contributed to the direction and final product of the study. Significant
contributions were also provided by the Information Access and User
Assistance Branch Chief, Sam Conger and his staff, with special
assistance coming from Linda Wastler, Clarence Tutwiler, Bruce
Rothrock, Lee Manning, Phil Lindenstruth, Joyce Boyd, and Dave
White. Similarly, the Monitoring and Information Policy Branch
Chief, Robert Horn and his staff, Paul Kapinos and J. L. Lewis,
provided insight for future operational perspectives.
The Interagency Committee for Marine Environmental Prediction
(ICMAREP)
The ICMAREP subcommittee on Marine Environmental Baselines and
Monitoring (SC/MBM), as the Technical Advisory Committee for this
contract, provided excellent contacts with their agencies, as well as
individual and collective guidance to the program.
The United States Geological Survey (USGS)
The Department of Interior representative of ICMAREP/SC/MBM,
George Whetstone and his staff made the USGS Office of Water Data
Coordination files available, as well as providing other important
information concerning the USGS activities and capabilities.
iv
-------
The National Oceatiographic Data Center
Representative of the larger data bases pertinent to this study, the
NODC cooperated fully to define available resources and capabilities.
In addition, over 120 other data base managers similarly cooperated
when contacted for information; they are listed in the report and we
appreciate their input.
The EPA Regional Administrators and Staffs
The national plan required a very wide base of information from all
coastal EPA regions. We appreciate the cooperation of the Regional
Administrators and their staffs in assisting us in obtaining informa-
tion and reports and solidifying interfaces with key state and local
people.
The Coastal States
The agencies and staffs of the coastal states supplied considerable
amounts of information and exhibited a high degree of cooperation,
indicating their strong support for a national environmental data
management network.
v/vi
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paragraph Page
Section 1. THE NATIONAL OVERVIEW
1.1 The Problem 1-1
1.2 The Approach 1-4
1.3 Summary 1-5
1.4 State Level Comparison 1-13
1.5 Conclusions and Recommendations 1-13
Section 2. INVENTORY OF COASTAL WATER QUALITY FACTORS
2.1 Approach 2-1
2. 2 Geographic Aspects of Federal and State
Organizational Structure 2-2
2.3 Water Quality Standards Review 2-7
2.4 Inventory Approach 2-20
2.5 Data Bank Characteristics Inventory 2-21
2. 6 Review of Environmental Factors Affecting the
Coastal Zone 2-27
2.7 Municipal Waste Discharge Inventory 2-30
2.8 Industrial Waste Discharge Inventory 2-32
2.9 Steam Electric and Nuclear Power Plants Inventory 2-33
2.10 Ocean Dumping Inventory 2-34
2.11 Water Quality Monitoring Inventory 2-43
2.12 Inventory of Laboratories, Facilities and Vessels 2-44
2.13 Legislation Inventory 2-52
Section 3. COASTAL ZONE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
3.1 Inventory Results 3-1
vii
-------
Table of Contents (Continued)
Paragraph
Page
3. 2
Environmental Influences on Monitoring
3-9
3. 3
Laboratory Sample Analysis Costs
Section 4. COASTAL ZONE
WATER QUALITY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
3-13
4.1
General Considerations for Coastal Water Quality
Monitoring
4-1
4.2
Monitoring Requirements for Water Quality in
Areas of Waste Discharge
APPENDICES
4-11
Appendix
A
Coastal Zone Cross Reference List
A-l
B
State Water Quality Criteria Inventory
B-l
C
Data Bank Inventory
C-l
D
Environmental Inventory
D-l
E
Municipal Waste Discharge Inventory
E-l
F
Industrial Waste Discharge Inventory
F-l
G
Steam-Electric and Nuclear Power Plant Inventory
G-l
H
Ocean Dumping Inventory
H-l
I
Water Quality Monitoring Inventory
1-1
J
Laboratory and Facilities Inventory
J-l
K
Investigation of Factors Affecting Monitoring Activity
K-l
L
Synopsis of Approach to Acquire Information
L-l
M
Laboratory Cost Evaluations
M-l
N
Legislation Inventory
N-l
0
Sampled Data Problems
0-1
viii
-------
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
Section 2. INVENTORY OF COASTAL WATER QUALITY FACTORS
2-1 Environmental Protection Agency Regions and Regional
Offices 2-3
2-2 EPA National Organization 2-4
2-3 Standard Regional Organization Chart 2-5
2-4 Coastal Environmental Regions of the United States 2-28
Section 3. COASTAL ZONE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
3-1 Square Footage vs Employees 3-27
3-2 Cost Model (Variable and Fixed Costs) 3-30
3-3 Selling Prices vs Size 3-31
3-4 Cost Model (Breakeven Analysis) 3-35
3-5 Total Labs vs Analytical Cost (By Type of Lab) 3-38
ix
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Section 1. THE NATIONAL OVERVIEW
1-1 Regional Comparison Summary-Demographic 1-7
1-2 Regional Comparison Summary-Waste Discharge 1-8
1-3 Regional Comparison Summary-Monitoring 1-9
1-4 Coastal Population Waste Discharge Monitoring
Summary 1-14
Section 2. INVENTORY OF COASTAL WATER QUALITY FACTORS
2-1 State Water Quality Criteria 2-9
2-2 State Water Quality Criteria Rank 2-10
2-3 State Water Quality Criteria Importance 2-11
2-4 Commonly Measured Water Quality Criteria 2-12
2-5 Status of State Water Quality Implementation Plans 2-16
2-6 Dominating Environmental Factors of the Estuarine
Zone of the United States 2-29
2-7 Coastal Municipal Waste Discharge Summary 2-31
2-8 Coastal Industrial Waste Discharge Summary 2-32
2-9 Summary of Type, Amount, and Estimated Costs of
Wastes Disposed 2-37
2-10 Ocean Dumping Sites 2-41
2-11 Regional Summary - Monitoring Activity 2-45
2-12 Regional Summary - General Parameters Monitored 2-46
2-13 Regional Summary - Specific Parameters Monitored 2-47
2-14 Laboratory Facilities in U. S. 2-48
x
-------
Figure
List of Tables (Continued)
Page
Section 3. COASTAL ZONE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
3-1
General Parameter Groups
3-1
3-2
Specific Parameters
3-2
3-3
Percent Difference Augmented Data in Case Study Areas
3-3
3-4
Station Measurement Ratios With and Without Case
Studies
3-4
3-5
Coastal County Classification
3-5
3-6
Adjustment to Number of Stations
3-7
3-7
Adjustment to Measurements Per Year
3-7
3-8
National Coastal Zone Averages
3-8
3-9
Outfall Monitoring Program Survey
3-10
3-10
Laboratory Cost Analysis by Parameter
3-16
3-11
Non-Automated Chemical Analysis
3-21
3-12
Central Laboratory WRD
3-22
3-13
Percent Distribution by Square Footage
3-25
3-14
Laboratory Equipment
3-28
3-15
Relationships by Range
3-28
3-16
Fixed/Variable Costs by Range
3-29
3-17
Breakeven Analysis Summary
3-34
xi/xii
-------
Section 1
THE NATIONAL OVERVIEW
1.1 THE PROBLEM
In order to safeguard the nation's coastal waters and to protect our marine
environment from further degradation, it is essential to devise a national
plan for coastal water quality monitoring to establish a coordinated effort
to acquire, store, retrieve, exchange and use data/information at local,
state, regional and national levels. A significant part of the planning is
the consideration of the effects on the environment by population density,
ocean dumping, industrial waste and thermal discharge.
There are many different definitions of the coastal zone. National agencies,
state agencies, agencies within state, county, city and socio-economic
groups each have their own definition. The coastal zone of the United
States comprises the land, waters and submerged regions along the coast-
line, including the Great Lakes. Within the coastal zone are areas such
as beaches, salt marshes, coastal and intertidal areas, sounds, embay-
ments, harbors, lagoons, rivers and channels.
For the purposes of this study and report, the coastal zone was considered
to extend seaward to the outer limits of the United States contiguous zone
inland to the border of each coastal county, and to the international bound-
ary between the United States and Canada, and the United States and Mexico.
The inland border of a coastal county was used because the entire county
was found to be the "least common denominator" among most of the data
bases of interest and defined statistical summaries available for analysis
of coastal zone water quality monitoring.
1-1
-------
It is important to define the difference between sampling and monitoring.
Sampling is considered to be a one-time occurrence of the collection of
information and may include the processing, transmission and storage of
that information in the form of reports. Sampling and intensive studies
have provided a great deal of information about many areas and have pro-
vided information for statements about the effects of pollutants on the
environment. Monitoring is defined as having three major components:
(1) the acquisition of data at approximately the same location and at some
repeat time frequency (arbitrarily established as at least once per year),
(2) the processing of data into a usable format, and (3) the use of that data/
information for a purpose. Detection of water quality changes, desirable
or undesirable is necessary, and monitoring is one of the major keys to
the management of environmental quality. Monitoring is essential to de-
velop trends in information for identifying water quality improvement needs,
establishing priorities, and evaluating cleanup program effectiveness.
Monitoring should provide an early warning system for water quality prob-
lems; this might allow corrective action to be taken before the problem
becomes serious. Monitoring is also necessary if enforcement actions are
to be performed.
The high population density, municipalities and industries in the coastal
counties produce the major portion of the pollution that occurs in the de-
fined coastal zone. Therefore, it was important for this study that data,
information and statistics be compiled as a function of each coastal county.
Data from each county could then be summarized in various ways, such as
by districts, river basins, state, EPA regions, or the entire nation. This
type of information was used to establish the existing capabilities available
to meet the needs for water quality monitoring at various levels.
Many different agencies maintain routine monitoring for sampling purposes
in the coastal zone. These programs appear to be duplicative; but on a
closer examination, many support distinctive operational and research
needs. In order to design a coastal water quality monitoring network, one
1-2
-------
must describe the level of monitoring presently existing in the coastal
zone* both in general terms as well as in several specific technical and
socio-political perspectives. The essential information has not previously
been collected in sufficient detail, and has not adequately covered certain
geographic areas to be significant in management planning and in the utili-
zation of existing capabilities. The portions of the coastal zone which have
been intensely studied in the past are those with specific problems or those
located near academic or research facilities.
Actual measurements are necessary to establish the true characteristics
of the water quality in each part of the coastal zone, in order to allow
proper criteria to be established and used. Most of the available informa-
tion on the coastal zone is partial; i. e., information collected by different
people at different times and in different places. Only a few studies have
been broad enough or have dealt with synoptic information.
There is a great deficiency of basic information on water quality versus
effects. It is clear that water quality data is of limited value unless data
on the sources and amounts of pollution that affect the water quality are
collected at the same time. A problem of an adequate data base exists,
indicating that there is a need for more comprehensive interrelated studies
to better understand the true effects of the total pollutant discharge load.
Some effort is now being expended in research to establish a relationship
and to develop mathematical models, but their use is hindered by the lack
of basic data.
Little is known concerning the effects of waste discharges on any body of
water; the nature of waste discharged, the manner and degree of disper-
sion, and the way in which it reacts chemically and biologically with the
environment. A waste management program can only be effective if ade-
quate knowledge exists for the coastal zone and for the water quality that
is to be managed.
1-3
-------
1. 2 THE APPROACH
The basic management process consists of five essential steps: plan,
organize, staff, direct, and control. The Final Report (Phase C) deals
primarily in the first area, planning. Planning encompasses the following
main activities: (1) establish status, (2) set objectives, (3) set goals,
(4) establish priorities, sequences and timing, (5) set procedures and
standardize methods.
The Phase A report documents the status and the resources currently
available. The results of this information can then be utilized to set ob-
jectives and goals and to establish a coordinated requirements plan for the
utilization of resources and capabilities in a National Coastal Water Quality
Monitoring Network.
For an effective national overview, the following list of detailed informa-
tion was generated for the coastal areas of the United States:
Description
Referenced
Appendix
Coastal Zone Cross Reference List
State Water Quality Criteria Inventory
Data Bank Inventory
Environmental Inventory
Municipal Waste Discharge Inventory
Industrial Waste Discharge Inventory
Steam-Electric and Nuclear Power Plant Inventory
Ocean Dumping Inventory
Water Quality Monitoring Inventory
Laboratory and Facilities Inventory
Investigation of Factors Affecting Monitoring Activity
Synopsis of Approach to Acquire Information Covering
The Existing Water Quality Monitoring Activity
Laboratory Cost Evaluations
Legislative Inventory
Sampled Data Problems
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
1-4
-------
In parallel with the above, data/information was acquired in Phase B for
specific areas utilizing a common set of guidelines, allowing the formula-
tion of coastal water quality monitoring network plans for each of several
very different regions. Estimates for present total need, future expected
monitoring activity needs, and data management requirements to be estab-
lished were then made. Phase C uses the information gathered (in both
Phase A and B) as primary elements to formulate the Initial Network Plans
and Specifications of the National Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Net-
work. The intent of the plan is to establish a methodology for the elements
of data acquisition, data information flow, data storage and retrieval, and
data information usage; thus, monitoring efforts and organization, as well
as management structures at all levels, will be initially identified.
1.3 SUMMARY
To safeguard the nation's coastal waters and to protect the marine environ-
ment it is essential that a coordinated national plan be developed for moni-
toring water quality. In order to develop a national plan, it is necessary
to have a national overview of the coastal zone to determine the waste dis-
charged into it and the water quality monitoring activities presently con-
ducted. Water quality monitoring activities are managed from the national,
regional and state levels. Although water quality problems recognize no
boundaries, the division of EPA into regions is essential for administra-
tive and management convenience; however, coordination between regions
is essential.
Eighty-two million people live in the 325 counties of the 30 states that com-
prise the coastal zone, representing 41 percent of the country's population;
an increase of 16 percent from 1960 to 1970. The coastal zone, including
the Great Lakes but excluding Alaska, has 58, 508 miles of tidal shoreline
and 9,422 miles of general shoreline, with an average density of 8, 700
people per mile of general shoreline.
1-5
-------
Present Monitoring Activity
Some 1,872 water quality monitoring stations and 2. 7 million measurements
per year are listed in the national computerized files; however, it is esti-
mated that there are at least 6, 800 active water quality monitoring stations
in the coastal zone producing nearly 3. 5 million measurements per year.
Thus, on the average, there are about 500 measurements taken per station
per year in the nation's coastal zone, where a measurement is defined as
one sample of one parameter.
The above figures were obtained by extrapolating from inventory data. The
extrapolation is based on comparison of inventory data with and without
input from the six case study areas covered in Phase B of the report.
Relationship with Other Factors
In general, this study revealed no significant correlation between coastal
zone water quality monitoring activity and population, population density,
area, municipal or industrial waste discharge, or number of water quality
laboratories. A slight correlation exists with total miles of general shore-
line. Details of this analysis are presented in appendix K - Investigation
of Factors Affecting Monitoring Activity.
Regional Comparison
Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3 contain selected data summarized to the EPA
region level from the detaiLed inventories. Percentages in relation to the
total coastal zone are also compared among regions.
Table 1-1, Demographic Data, provides information on coastal population,
miles of shoreline, and population densities. The coastal population data
was taken from 1970 Census sources based on the 325 coastal counties de-
fined in appendix A. Tidal shoreline includes the outer coast, offshore
islands, sounds, bays, rivers, and creeks to the head of tidewater or to
a point where tidal waters narrow to a width of 100 feet. General shore-
line includes sounds and bays to a point where they narrow to a width of
30 minutes of latitude, and includes the distance crossed at such a point.
1-6
-------
TABLE 1-1. REGIONAL COMPARISON SUMMARY
Demographic Data
Population Densities
EPA
Region
1970
Coastal
Population
Miles of
Shoreline(4)
Per
Sq Mi
County
Per Mi
Tidal
Shore
Per Mi
General
Shore
Tidal
General
I
6, 295,800
6,130
473
434
1,027
13,310
II
16, 731, 300
3,642
257
1,875
4,594
65,102
III
8, 767, 600
6,975
171
627
1,257
51,273
IV
7, 261, 500
17,987
2,035
139
404
3,568
V(l)
19,428,000
3,679
3,679
300
5,281
5, 281
VI
4,404, 600
11,180
764
176
394
5,765
IX
16,492,800
4,479
1,590
391
3,682
10,373
X(2)
2, 745, 200
4,436
453
80
619
6,060
Totals
82,126,800
58,508
9,422
321(3)
1,404(3)
8, 716(3)
Percent (6) of Total
I
8
10
5
(5)
135
(5)
73
(5)
153
II
20
6
3
584
327
747
ni
11
12
2
195
90
588
IV
9
31
22
43
29
41
V(1)
24
6
39
93
376
61
VI
5
19
8
55
28
66
IX
20
8
17
122
262
119
X(2)
3
8
5
25
44
70
Notes:
(1) Counties in Pennsylvania and New York which border the Great
Lakes have been included in Region 5 to maintain geographical
consistency.
(2) Alaska data excluded to avoid gross distortion
(3) Averages (for instance, total population t total coastal area)
(4) a. The Water Encyclopedia by David Keith Todd, &
b. National Shoreline Study by U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(5) Percent of average
(6) Rounded to nearest whole percent
1-7
-------
TABLE 1-2. REGIONAL COMPARISON SUMMARY
Waste Discharge and Laboratory Data
EPA
Region
Thermal
Discharge
MGD
Waste Discharge,
MGD
No. of
Water Quality
Labs
Municipal
Industrial
Total
I
6, 179
840
371
1, 211
31
II
17, 906
1, 749
1, 315
3,064
28
III
6, 570
1, 179
1,974
3,153
31
IV
11, 209
394
1, 527
1,921
73
V
16, 750
2, 745
3,853
6, 598
22
VI
2, 789
210
4, 765
4,975
26
IX
11, 682
1,981
694
2, 675
46
X
85
311
578
889
32
Totals
73,170
9,409
15,077
24,486
289
Percent (1) of Total
I
8
9
2
5
1
n
24
19
9
13
10
III
9
13
13
13
1
IV
15
4
10
8
25
V
23
29
26
27
8
VI
4
2
32
20
9
IX
16
21
5
11
16
X
1
3
4
4
11
(1) Rounded to nearest whole percent.
1-8
-------
TABLE 1-3. REGIONAL COMPARISON AND SUMMARY
Monitoring Data
Monitoring Activity (1)
Monitoring Activity (2)
No.
EPA
Case
No. of
Me as.
Avg Meas
No. of
Meas.
Avg Meas.
Study
Region
Stations
Per Year
Per Sta/Yr
Stations
Per Year
Per Sta/Yr
Areas
I
108
113,513
1,051
108
113,513
1,051
II
147
111,512
759
289
198,598
687
1
III
148
290,608
1,964
148
290,608
1,964
IV
451
247,241
548
1,088
507,728
467
3
V
589
685,659
1,164
580
675,450
1,165
VI
118
214,879
1,821
118
214,879
1,821
IX
190
475,282
2.501
316
527,006
1,668
1
X
121
565,544
4,674
197
577,144
2,930
1
Totals
1,872 2,704,238
1,445 (3)
2,844 3,104,926
1,092 (3)
6
Percent of Total (5)
(4)
(4)
I
6%
4%
73%
4%
4%
96%
II
8
4
53
10
6
63
17%
III
8
11
136
5
9
180
IV
24
9
38
38
16
43
50
V
31
25
81
20
22
107
VI
6
8
126
4
7
167
IX
10
18
173
11
17
153
17
X
6
21
323
7
19
268
17
Notes:
(1) Without case study data.
(2) With case study data.
(3) Averages (total meas/yr 4- No. of stations)
(4) Percent of average.
(5) Rounded to nearest whole percent.
1-9
-------
Table 1-2, Waste Discharge and Laboratory Data, provides information on
thermal discharge, municipal and industrial waste discharges and the number
of water quality laboratories in the regions. There is at least 9,400 MG
of municipal waste, 15, 000 MG of industrial waste and 73,000 MG of
thermal-affected water discharged daily into the coastal zone. Most of
these figures are conservative as the inventories revealed plants for which
there was no discharge data available.
Table 1-3, Monitoring Data, examines water quality monitoring activities
within the coastal zone. A comparison of summary data with and without
input from the Phase B case studies is shown. There is a notable shift
in the percentage distribution due to the input from the case study areas.
The case study data showed an increase in the number and percentage
of monitoring stations within the regions. However, the average number
of measurements per station per year showed a significant drop, indicating
a disproportionate increase in the number of monitoring stations versus
the number of measurements taken per year. A significant shift of this
nature could result from a small reduction in the number of continuous
monitoring stations. It is known that considerable additional information
on stations, samples and measurements per year for region VI (Texas),
is not yet in national files and not reflected in the tables. It is apparent
that the case study phase provided a large amount of data otherwise
unobtainable from national sources.
Some interesting comparisons may be drawn from the figures in the three
tables. Regions I, II, and III have, jointly, about 40 percent of the
coastal population and 40 percent of the municipal waste discharge, but
combined they provide less than 20 percent of the monitoring activities
and have only about 12 percent of the water quality laboratories. Region
IV shows the highest level of monitoring activity, the largest number of
water quality laboratories, and the greatest number of tidal miles of
shoreline, but has only 9 percent of the total coastal population. It
1-10
-------
appears that the numbers for municipal waste discharge in Regions IV and
VI are low in relation to the total population. This is most probably due
to incomplete data in those regions.
The most intensive monitoring programs have developed due to rapidly
rising levels of pollution such as in the Great Lakes. There is a greater
number of monitoring stations and measurements per year shown for
Region V than in any other region without the added case study data. The
large number of stations and total measurements per year is probably
related to the fact that the waters of the Great Lakes are fresh and used
by many municipalities as the source of drinking water; thus, for each
location of an intake pipe at a water treatment facility there are monitoring
stations which record a great number of parameters at rather frequent
intervals.
Region VI data shows an unusual pattern in that it is ranked very low in
population and monitoring activity, but has the highest percentage of
industrial waste discharge. It is the second largest region in terms of
total waste discharge. Region X data shows almost no thermal discharge
and the lowest total waste discharge; therefore, the data results in a
higher number of samples per MGD of discharge than the other regions.
The tables show that thermal discharges amount to some three times that
of waste discharges, and that the total discharge into the coastal zone
from both waste and thermal sources is about 100 billion gallons per day;
this is equal to about 1,218 gallons per day per person, whereas municipal
waste discharge amounts to about 114 gallons per day per person. The
thermal and municipal discharge vs per capita percentages agree fairly
well among the regions and these factors also show a fair relation to the
population percentages. Percentages for Regions III and IV show an
opposite effect; i. e. , region III shows 9 percent thermal and 13 percent
municipal, whereas in Region IV this ratio is 15 percent and 4 percent,
1-11
-------
respectively, This is probably due to the fact that most power generation
in Region III is done inland, and it is generated on the coast in Region IV.
Appendix C, Summary of Data Banks, provides an assessment of 104 data
banks. Of this total, 19 currently provide water quality data input to the
EPA Storage and Retrieval System (STORET). There are 38 additional
data banks with water quality data not currently on the STORET system.
There are 40 data banks with data other than water quality data that is
relatable to trends in the coastal environment.
From the inventory it was found that the sample collection agencies are
understaffed and underequipped to monitor in the manner they feel is
necessary, but it appears that the number of laboratories, vessels and
personnel is adequate to handle the analyses load for water quality monitoring,
provided the sample load maintains the same approximate geographic
distribution.
Based on available information, it is estimated that there are 6, 800 active
water quality monitoring stations at which 3.5 million measurements are
made per year in the coastal zone. However, based on a small survey of
existing water quality monitoring programs conducted for thermal, muni-
cipal and industrial waste dischargers, it can be projected that at least
11,000 stations and 4. 25 million measurements per year are needed to
meet the requirement for waste discharge monitoring. The coastal zone
areas in between points of discharge would require additional monitoring.
The amount of water quality data generated each year for the entire coastal
zone (based on 6,800 monitoring stations) may be estimated if the following
assumptions are made:
(1) Each measurement requires a minimum of 20 characters to define
the parameter name, value, date and time of measurement, and
(2) each station requires 150 characters for identification.
1-12
-------
Data volume is 20 char/meas x 3,461, 286 meas/yr = 69, 225, 720 char/yr;
plus 150 char/sta x 6, 832 stations = 1, 024,800, for a grand total of
70, 250, 920 characters per year. This would be equivalent to about
878,000 punch cards, or about 4 reels of 9-track, 800 character/inch
magnetic computer tape per year.
1.4 STATE LEVEL COMPARISON
Table 1-4 presents key demographic, waste discharge and monitoring
activity information detailed to the coastal state levels. All of this data
has been summarized from the respective inventories described within
this report.
1. 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. 5.1 Conclusion
(1) There are only a few classical parameters for the measurement
of water quality; coliform, pH, salinity, temperature, dissolved
oxygen, floating solids, color, and sometimes a partial or a com-
plete mineral analysis. Occasionally other analyses are conducted
for certain heavy metals or nutrients to determine base level
quality.
(2) A specific standard should be developed for sample collection
procedures, analytical methods, accuracy and the reporting units
for each parameter.
(3) There does not appear to be any significant relationship between
coastal zone water quality monitoring activity and population,
population density, area, municipal or industrial waste discharge,
or the number of water quality laboratories.
1-13
-------
TABLE 1-4. COASTAL POPULATION
WASTE DISCHARGE MONITORING SUMMARY
2* MAY 197?
» » • DCMfJGw APHIC DATA
• • waste DISCHARGE
POPULATION
awe:a
DTNSIT Y
fJMCIPAL
industry
Tf»TAL
STATE
X 1000
a'j -' i
/SO Ml
M30
MOD
1 CT
188?.9
2271
829.12
178.93
181.19
360.12
1 MA
28(,2.3
2695
1062.C7
549.12
57.64
606,76
1 MF
4f>4 >9
7788
59.69
9.80
106.08
115.88
1 Nh
139.0
691
201,09
4.10
C.00
4.10
1 RI
9ii>i • 7
1C53
899.C7
98.01
26.27
124,28
WL'S J 0'. 1
SuoTPTAL
62f>5 • g
1 4498
434.25
?39,96
371.18
1211.14
¦3 NJ
52/7.3
4195
1258.CI
662.29
839.65
1551,94
c NY
11 4'.-, *»C
472<>
"4i:2.c7
3 C«6.b"
*25.36
1511.90
KLol1\ l
SUBTOTAL
!6731.3
8924
1674.87
1748.83
1315.01
3063.64
J DC
7s6 , h
l>\
124C1.8C
?3C » 4'0
. 25
230,65
3 DE
546. 1
1983
276.40
85. 12
135.93
221.05
3
29-,4. f-
6154
*80.11
249.29
98A.7R
1238,07
3 PA
2548.6
313
8142,63
4 71./2
518.62
990,34
3 V A
19 V). 7
54/1
358.2C
142.6*
330.37
473,05
RrCIPrv 3
SUBTOTAL
87 67.6
13982
627. 1 3
1179.21
1973.95
3153. 16
4 AL
376.7
28H
133.67
26 . 26
372.86
399.12
' TL
54-16 • 5
3139?
173.82
315.91
59C.49
906.40
1 Ci A
2*1-1
2H'J3
97,17
8.5)4
391.4^
400,40
it
239.9
18C3
133.C8
14.b9
7.7P
22.31
-* ,\f
477. 4
8741
54.62
14,40
c.00
14,40
4 SC
4 r>'J . 9
4533
94,fe4
13.54
164.7^
178,33
WLC»I»N 4
StjiJTPTAL
72*1.5
521*0
139.16
393.64
1527,3?
1920,96
5 IL
58 75.C
1411
4163.72
57.36
617.98
675,34
5" IM
7:jR.7
1545
478.13
118.73
-1C15.45
1134,18
b *!J
4 R 7 4 . 7
30556
159.53
1599.6,4
839.58
2439,22
5 *1*.
2 37.5
950C
25.CO
30.64
29.93
60,57
PAGE 1
**G f0NIT9HISiG*
N'j • 6F" PARAMETER
STA-N3 SAMPLe;/VR
65
34
2
C
7
108
137
If)?
289
33
6
*9
37
3
146
1*
1019
25
1
22
7
1088
140
26
188
10
42095
36 ICO
17520
0
17798
113513
91649
106949
196598
71h95
44623
35825
137417
1248
290 606
428
312367
1C7452
11
862C2
868
5C7728
43379
2759
152558
11564
Note: To maintain geographical consistency, counties bordering the
Great Lakes in New York and Pennsylvania are Included in Region 5.
1-14
-------
Table 1-4. Coastal Population Waste Discharge Monitoring Summary
(Continued)
?4 "AV
• • »
state; x iocd
u '*y ?bn2>C
"J4 ?9'»1 •*)
/ f1* ?n.3.7
r v, I 1914.5
lii.jll', fc.
S.-l: T "T At
h l* 1 5¦ <.. 7
* ^ V *-.' g '! 1. a
5. j TP T Au 4 4,4. C.
'' CA
" 7,.X.ft
k •. j I ° n
S .la T'*TA<_ J f- 4 -1? t
DATA
Ar\t A
SS f'I
730<*
:.Tj6
813
1 JSCS
lO'lR
1*3n
t'jr.u
3^. 1
hkV !
4?1 ( ?
1 A S ^ " I i
i:
S..-.'T0TAl, -J43t:,4
:^7t„
i
« « »
'-t .\SIT Y
/sc: "!
3^4.8 7
9?9.C1
3?*.3C
181.cl
648SC ?')9.
SA^PLtl/YR
216.36
3 8 8 . ft 6
6C5.fl?
74
7196
39 7.C9
7 34.3?
1131.41
77
4l6R9b
49, 8-8
31. 35
81 .23
2
2911
?75.C9
195.41
470.^0
63
38188
2744.79
38ri?.ft8
6597,47
68;)
6754SC
73.13
3^?.47
435.ftC
83
2C5481
137.11
440?.1^
4539,?fe
3h
9398
? 1C . t '~
47ft
•lj9 -9 1
3r S . K ?
94C8.32 1u C 7 ft < 3 8
2844 3JC4926
1-15
-------
(4) Water quality monitoring of gross changes in such parameters as
temperature, turbidity and color by remote sensing of large areas
may prove to be more economical for the amount of information
derived than conventional or insitu monitoring by field personnel.
(5) Well-equipped analytical laboratories are available for analysis
of samples obtained from long-term monitoring programs. Ade-
quate laboratory support may not exist in any one area for crash
programs, but with rapid air freight and modern shipping con-
tainers, samples can be adequately moved to well-equipped
laboratories in another region. Some accuracy problems may
result if long traveling distances are involved for the samples or
the receiving laboratory has pre-set priorities not permitting
timely sample processing.
(6) There is a significant portion of the national coastline that is
remote and inaccessible, presently unaffected by pollution by con-
tinuous discharges. These areas need a few carefully planned
monitoring programs, but do not require widespread programs
for source monitoring.
(7) Present monitoring programs are not adequately supplying the
information necessary to protect the future quality of the coastal
waters. Programs and parameters as established in the past are
not providing enough environmental information to detect and
evaluate the impact of man's activities on the aquatic environment.
(8) Primary efforts in monitoring should be concentrated on those
parameters which provide information on heavily polluted areas
and pollution sources.
(9) The present study shows that ongoing monitoring at current ocean
disposal sites for assessing environmental effects is insufficient,
and practically non-existent.
1-16
-------
(10) Self monitoring programs, by waste dischargers in some states
such as California, are an important source of effluent (quantity
and quality) data and receiving water quality data. In the past,
most of these programs have not included sufficient monitoring
of parameters having major biological significance, such as
pesticides, certain heavy metals and other toxicants and bio-
stimulants; however, improvements are being made. A manda-
tory, self monitoring system, with a stringent widespread
monitoring program in receiving waters, will yield maximum
water quality information.
(11) The scope of this study, which summarizes data to the state and
region levels, may have resulted in the masking of relationships
between monitoring and other factors.
1. 5. 2 Recommendations
(1) The following omissions exist in present sampling for routine
water quality data programs:
• Nutrients and biostimulants
• Heavy metals
• Pesticides
• Organic industrial chemicals
• Aquatic biota
• Nuisance and esthetics conditions
The above parameters or conditions need not be monitored con-
tinuously, but may be used as water quality indicators; their back-
ground levels, variation over time and their effects on beneficial
uses of water must be assessed. The above indicators should be
correlated with more easily measured water quality criteria so
that the frequency of measurement of these more expensive indi-
cators can be held to a minimum.
1-17
-------
(2) A direct measurement of the effects of pollutants on the marine
biota may be an effective pollution surveillance method for a
large-scale network. The technical feasibility of using an alarm
system of this type should be included in a review of pollution
parameters measured in the coastal monitoring network.
(3) A comprehensive water quality monitoring program should be
designed for the coastal waters of each state. This would give the
necessary emphasis and consideration to problem constituents, to
geographical areas and to monitoring methods and equipment.
(4) Additional data with detail on ocean dumping should be acquired
and a comprehensive update of this subject accomplished. Such
comprehensive information should be obtained by amounts per
year of the different materials dumped, for each locality and dis-
posal area for the years 1969 through 1972, so that trend pro-
jections can be made.
(5) There exists a large amount of information outside of the national
computerized files. This material should be formatted and com-
piled. Data which is not considered as a "sample" may be com-
bined with other data to actually become monitoring data.
(6) All new programs involving water quality data with federal
government support should require that the contractor enter the
data at certain intervals into a national system.
(7) Self-monitoring programs should be expanded to all states and
dischargers. Both the discharge and the receiving waters must
be monitored. Improvements or changes are necessary in the
parameters monitored, methods of sampling, training of monitor-
ing personnel and laboratory techniques.
1-18
-------
Section 2
INVENTORY OF COASTAL WATER QUALITY FACTORS
2.1 APPROACH
An inventory of resources within the coastal zone represents a primary
requirement of Phase A. This includes:
(1) A review of the various water quality monitoring groups and
organizations within the coastal zone.
(2) A review of the existing national and state water quality standards.
(3) Inventory information such as data bank characteristics; environ-
mental factors affecting the coastal zone; municipal waste dis-
charge inventory; industrial waste discharge inventory; steam,
electric, and nuclear power plant inventory; ocean dumping
inventory; and water quality monitoring inventory.
The primary result of Phase A is an overview of information to allow the
formation of conclusions and recommendations for the National Coastal
Water Quality Monitoring Network (Phase C).
The following sections present the scope of each inventory activity, the
approach taken, and the results obtained. In general, typical or summary
results are shown in the body of the report, with larger quantities of data
provided in the appendices as backup information.
2-1
-------
2. 2 GEOGRAPHIC ASPECTS OF FEDERAL AND STATE ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
Within the specific area of monitoring the coastal zone water quality, many
different agencies operate routine monitoring programs covering various
aspects of water quality. Generally, each of these operates with a differ-
ent charter and, in most cases, in a manner not coordinated with other
agencies or even departments within their own agency.
The Interagency Committee for Marine Environmental Prediction (ICMAREP)
serves to provide the Executive Branch with a coordinated, overall summary
of Marine Environmental Prediction (MAREP) services and of relevant
research and development programs to improve those services. The sub-
committee on Marine Baselines and Monitoring of the ICMAREP has recently
prepared a plan for coastal water quality monitoring.
The intent of this section is to delineate the geographic division or structure
of the EPA National, Regional and State organizations, as well as of those
federal agencies that are located, or perform specific monitoring functions,
in the coastal zone.
The coastal zone water quality activities of EPA, in general, are managed
from national and regional levels. As such, the eight coastal related
regional divisions of EPA were reviewed. It was found expedient also to
review the related coastal counties and states, within these regions, so
that their interrelationships to water quality monitoring could be determined.
EPA
The EPA is structured into ten regions (figure 2-1), with a headquarters
staff in Washington, D. C. The National organizational structure of EPA
(figure 2-2) is quite distinct from Regional EPA (figure 2-3).
Cognizance over coastal water quality monitoring at the EPA National level
is appropriately divided among the Monitoring and Data Support Division,
2-2
-------
— - - A1y
CHICAGO
KANSAS CITY
-T""
fort worth
**.
DALLAS
O
PUERTO IICO m< VIRGIN ISLAND
HAWAII
N
I
CO
Figure 2-1. Environmental Protection Agency Regions and Regional Offices
-------
to
I
STAFF
OFFTCE OF WATER
: PROGRAM OPERATIONS
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF
AUDIT
OFFICE OF
RADIATION PROGRAMS
OFFICES
REGIONAL
REGION VII
KANSAS CITY
REGION VI
DALLAS
REGION III
PHILADELPHIA
REGION V
CHICAGO
REGION II
NEW YORK
REGION I
BOSTON
REGION IV
ATLANTA
OFFICE OF
PLANNING & EVAL
OFFICE OF
ENFORCEMENT
OFFICE OF
RESOURCES >IGT.
REGION X
SEATTLE
OFFICE OF
GENERAL COUNSEL
REGION IX
SAN FRANCISCO
REGION VIII
DENVER
OFFICE OF
AIR PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF
PUBLIC AFFAIRS
OFFICE OF
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
OFFICE OF
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
OFFICE or
CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS
OFFICE OF WATER
PLANNING & STDS.
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE
MGT. PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF
PESTICIDES PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF
PROGRAM OPERATIONS
OFFICE OF
RESEARCH
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR
FOR
AIR AND WATER PROGRAMS
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR
FOR ENFORCEMENT
4 GENERAL COUNSEL
OFFICE OF
MONITORING
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR
FOR
CATEGORICAL PROGRAMS
ADMINISTRATOR
DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR
FOR
PLANNING & MANAGEMENT
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR
FOR RESEARCH
& MONITORING
Figure 2-2.
EPA National Organization
-------
Grants j
Admin.
Branch!
Permits
Branch
Safety
Officer
Security
Officer
Support
Services
Branch
Personnel
Branch
Program
Support
Branch
Manpower
Dev.
Branch
Financial
Mgmt. Branch
Public
Affairs
Division
Enforce-
ment
Branch
Management
Division
Technical
Support
Branch
Program
Planning
Branch
Surveil-
lance
Branch
Manpower
Dev.
Branch
Audit and I
Inspection _ _J
Activities
Office of
Regional
Counsel
Program Planning
& Dev. Branch
Bnforcenent
Division
Equal
Opportunity
Division
Air & Water
Programs Dlv.
Categorical
Programs Dlv,
Planning
& Program
Support
Branch
Surveillance &
Analysis Dlv.
Assistant for Congressional &
Intergovernmental Relations
Deputy Regional
Administrator
Regional
Administrator
to
i
cn
Figure 2-3. Standard Regional Organization Chart
-------
Office of Water Standards and Planning, Office of Air and Water Programs
and Office of Research and Monitoring. At the EPA Regional level, moni-
toring responsibility is in the Surveillance and Analysis Division.
At the regional division, several factors must be considered:
• The need for proper management.
• The interrelationship of environmental factors.
• The geographic constraints.
As shown in figure 2-1, each region encompasses several states, with the
regions divided at state boundaries. Water quality problems do not neces-
sarily stop at state boundaries, leading to a need for close coordination/
liaison between regions and states to meet the larger river basin coordi-
nated planning and implementation requirements. However, from an
administrative point of view, it appears that the division of EPA regions
at state boundaries satisfies the requirement.
In general, the regional boundaries conform quite well to the natural en-
vironmental and typical pollution problems that might be found in that area.
In the area of the Great Lakes, one might note that the coastal zone lies
within three EPA regions, II, III, and V. Also, it can be noted that the
management of the shorelines of Lake Erie fall within all three regions.
Thus, the management of the Great Lakes as a continuous body of water
lies within three EPA regions. Since the Lakes are not similar to and are
geographically widely separated from the marine coastal zone, it seemed
more logical, from the standpoint of catalog category, analysis, the cross-
reference index, and the summaries of statistical information relating to
the coastal waters, that the Great Lakes coastline should be considered
totally as one region; therefore, for purposes of our cross-reference list
and the summaries of information, we have arbitrarily lumped informa-
tion on Great Lakes Coastline within EPA Region V.
2-6
-------
Other National Agencies
The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers has its own divisional system, which
conforms reasonably well to those of EPA. The U. S. Geological Survey,
the Bureau of Reclamation, the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife,
the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency, the U. S. Coast Guard,
the Atomic Energy Commission, the Federal Power Commission, and some
other agencies, each have their own divisions, inter-regions and district
offices. These have been variously structured for their best national ad-
ministration, with some specific emphasis related to geographic and/or
environmental considerations.
2. 3 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REVIEW
As part of the inventory task, a set of the coastal state's Water Quality Stand
ards were reviewed with similar and/or unique features noted. The Water
Quality Standards are made up of water use, criteria and implementation
plans.
Basically, the criteria are the scientific requirements on which decisions
or judgments may be based concerning the suitability of water to support a
designated water use. Implementation Plans are the individual state plans
to improve specific water quality, so that the previously established criteria
may be met. These plans must consider programs for water pollution pre-
vention and abatement. For the purpose of this study, our primary interest
in these standards is to determine the necessary background to ensure that
the monitoring requirements for the coastal zone may be described.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Water Quality
Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-234), authorized the state and the federal gov-
ernment to establish water quality standards for interstate waters by June,
1967. The purpose of the act was to enhance the quality and value of our
water resources and establish a national policy for the prevention, control
and abatement of water pollution. Guidelines for the establishment of the
states' standards and implementation plans were provided for each state
2-7
-------
agency developing the standards. The water quality standards submitted
by the states were subject to review by the Department of Interior and
approved as federal standards by the Secretary of Interior. These func-
tions were later transferred to EPA upon its formation in 1970. The Act
states that if the state does not accept water quality standards consistent
with the Act, EPA has the responsibility to work with the state to establish
suitable standards. The Act authorized the states to submit their own
water quality criteria. These criteria include physical, chemical, biolog-
ical, and aesthetic characteristics; they set demands upon the use of the
designated waters which are applied for marine, industrial, recreation,
and/or other uses.
2. 3.1 Criteria
The results of our analysis of State Water Quality Criteria have been com-
piled in tabular form to facilitate the comparison of criteria and point up
areas of commonality as well as areas of uniqueness. Water Quality
Standards are summarized for the coastal states in appendix B.
In some cases it was difficult to interpret standards as they applied to the
various uses. Some states have set standards according to each use to
which the waters are to be applied. Some states have set standards for
several water quality "classes, " each class being designated as suitable
for several uses. Some states have set standards for each river basin,
based on the existing water quality and the present and foreseeable future
uses. Therefore, the limits set for a given water quality parameter in
support of a given water use may vary within a state.
In many cases the states have determined that the existing water quality of
a given area will represent the lowest future water quality acceptable for
that area. However, the more progressive states have provided for pollu-
tion abatement and have established schedules for improvement of existing
water quality.
2-8
-------
To assist in the analysis of water quality criteria the data were manipulated
in the following ways:
• Number of coastal states using numerical, or descriptive water
quality criteria.
• Rank order of number of states using numerical, or descriptive
water quality criteria.
• Rank order of importance of certain water quality criteria based
on appearance in state water quality criteria.
Table 2-1 lists the number of coastal states using numerical or descrip-
tive water quality criteria. Thirty coastal states and territories have been
included, excluding California, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
As an example, temperature was given a numerical criterion by 16 states,
a descriptive criterion by 12 states and no criterion by 2 states.
TABLE 2-1. STATE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
Numerical Descriptive No
Criteria Criteria Criteria
Coliform
pH
Dissolved Oxygen
Temperature
BOD
Total Dissolved Solids
Radioactive
Sulphate
Chloride
Toxicity
Turbidity
Color
Odor
Floatable Solids
30
29
27
16
1
10
1
7
9
0
5
5
5
3
0
0
3
12
0
4
23
7
7
25
11
14
13
24
0
1
0
2
29
16
6
16
14
5
14
11
12
4
2-9
-------
Table 2-2 lists the rank order of states assigning numerical criteria,
descriptive criteria, or not mentioning criteria. Criteria that were de-
scribed numerically or described non-numerically are ranked in ascend-
ing order; i. e., the criteria most frequently found in State Water Quality
Standards received the higher rank. Those criteria not found (no criteria)
are inversely ranked.
TABLE 2-2. STATE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA RANK
Numerical
Criteria
Rank
Descriptive
Criteria
Rank
No
Criteria
Rank
Rank
Total
Coliform
1
12
1
14
pH
2
13
3
18
DO
3
11
2
16
Temperature
4
6
4
14
Total Dissolved Solids
5
10
12
27
Chloride
6
8
11
25
Sulphate
7
9
13
29
Color
8
4
8
20
Odor
9
5
9
23
Turbidity
10
7
10
27
Floatable Solids
11
2
5
18
Radioactivity
12
3
7
22
BOD
13
14
14
41
Toxicity
14
1
6
21
Table 2-3 lists the order of importance of water quality criteria, as found
in State Water Quality Standards. The ranks for each criteria are added
to arrive at a rank total. The ranks are then arranged in ascending order
giving the order of importance for each criteria irrespective of whether
the criteria was qualified or not (table 2-3). In the case of equal rank
totals, the criteria having a higher rank, in the numerical or most restric-
tive category, is given the higher order of importance.
2-10
-------
Table 2-3. STATE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA IMPORTANCE
Parameter Order of Importance
Coliform
1
Temperature
2
DO
3
pH
4
Floating Solids
5
Color
6
Toxicity
7
Odor
8
Radioactivity
9
Chlorinity (Chloride)
10
Total Dissolved Solids
11
Turbidity
12
Sulphate
13
BOD
14
In addition to water quality criteria as they appear in standards, there are
other ancillary criteria, or measurements, required to further describe
marine water quality (table 2-4). These somewhat broader measurements
may help to describe the movement and dispersion of pollutants. In addi-
tion to measurements made in the receiving waters, other factors such as
engineering aspects of the diffuser, density, solubility and chemical reac-
tivity of the effluent stream will also affect fate and behaviour of waste
material in the marine environment.
2. 3. 2 Specification of Water Uses
Specification of present and future water uses was the most consistent
information presented in the Water Quality Standards. Water use informa-
tion is presented in varying detail, with public and municipal water sup-
plies, fish and wildlife propagatiqn, recreation, industrial use, and
agricultural uses being most often mentioned.
2-11
-------
TABLE 2-4. COMMONLY MEASURED WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
Meteorological
Oceanographic
Physical
Chemical
Biological
Geological
pH
MPN
Sediment Thickness
Redox Potential
Total Bacteria
Sediment Grain Size
BOD. COD
Viruses
Sendiment Grain Shape
Dissolved Oxygen
Chlorophyll
Sediment Mineralogy
Carbon Dioxide
Phyto Plankton
Sediment Transport
Radiochemistry
Zoo Plankton
Geomorphology
Total Sulfide &
Dissolved Sulfide
Nitrogen
Nitrite
Nitrate
Phosphate
Orthophosphate
Detergents
Sulfate
Chlorides
Alkalinity
Hardness
Periphyton
Neuston
Fungus
Aquatic Flora
Benthos
Macroinvertebrates
Fish egg
Fish Larvae
Adult Fish
Other Vertebrates
Detritus
Fluoride
Carbon
Silica
Cyanide
Phenols
Pesticides
Iron
Toxic Metals
Light Metals
Heavy Metals
Noble Metals
Air Temperature
Humidity
Barometric Pressure
Wind Speed
Wind Direction
Precipitation
Solar Radiation
Cloud Cover
Depth
Tide
Wave Height
Wave Period
Wave Direction
Current Speed
Current Direction
Turbulence
Flow Rate
Temperature
Temp. Change Rate
Conductivity
Salinity
Density
Viscosity
Color
Light Penetrate
Turbidity
Radiological
Odor
Surface Film
Total Solids
Dissolved Solids
Suspended Solids
Suspended
Particle Size
Suspended
Particle Shape
Floating Solids
Settleable Solid
-------
Thirty-two states use a tabular format, fifteen use a narrative approach
and seven use a combination of both. Most states were.not specific in
assigning use classifications to individual areas. Some states assigned
water uses by river basin; these states included Alaska, Delaware, Illinois,
Indiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and the
Virgin Islands.
Although coordination among states, in the development of the standards,
was urged it is apparent (by the different types and varieties of standard
submitted) that there was actually very little coordination and cooperation.
This is perhaps due to the differences in water uses among neighboring
states, as well as entirely diverse future water use objectives.
Discussion of problems associated with such sources of pollution as com-
bined storm and sanitary sewers, vessels and marinas, oil deposits, acid
mine drainage, agricultural waste, solid waste, nutrient enrichment and
erosion are similar for most states. Forty-one states and territories dis-
cuss these problems. Thirteen made no mention of such pollution sources.
Except for Pennsylvania, which has had much experience with mine drain-
age problems, reports usually indicate that studies of sewer problems are
being conducted. Some general,long-range solutions were indicated, but
few concrete plans exist.
2.3.3 Implementation Plans
At the time the state standards were established, many municipalities and
industries of various states were allowing raw or untreated waste to be
discharged into interstate waterways. Most states did develop plans for
waste treatment and Implementation is proceeding. In some cases, states
have extended implementation plans through public hearings, or as the
result of enforcement conferences.
Of the 54 states and territories submitting water quality standards, very
few have a plan for implementation whereby pollution abatement progress
2-13
-------
can be measured at any point(s) in time for an identified source. Few
implementation plans exist for abating pollution from sources other than
municipalities or industries. Implementation plans should be established
as soon as possible for abating pollution from sources such as combined
sewers, vessels and marinas, oil deposits, mine drainage, agricultural
waste, solid waste and erosion.
Such planning and progress measures are necessary; implementation plans
should identify the site, sources, and type of pollution; name of the polluter;
indicate the improvement required necessary to ensure compliance with the
standards; and establish a timetable for compliance. The timetable should
establish specific reference or interim dates for such activities as pre-
planning, preparation of plans and specifications, arrangements for financ-
ing, as well as start and completion dates for construction. Additional
interim dates would be useful, but these basic check points are mandatory.
Implementation plans, in sufficient detail to enable progress to be measured
towards compliance with standards, do not exist for most states. Even if
the most liberal interpretation is made as to what constitutes interim status
or milestones, some states are still without such status, while interim
dates for most other states border on minimal checkpoints at best.
Guidelines for establishment of state implementation plans were provided
to each state developing the plan through the Federal Water Pollution Con-
trol Act. These guidelines were quite broad, as evidenced by the wide
latitude of interpretation and approach the individual states exhibited in the
development of their respective standards. This lack of uniformity pre-
sented a very difficult review problem, not allowing effective comparisons
to be made among all states.
The following features are significant deficiencies noted in the State Water
Quality Implementation Plans, as presented in 1967:
(1) For most states implementation plans are vague, with insufficient
detail to determine exact intent of schedules and plans.
2-14
-------
(2) In many cases there are no means of measuring the progress
towards eventual total implementation. In most, implementation
schedules have not been included.
(3) Many states have extended unofficial implementation schedules
beyond that which has been reported/approved.
(4) Not all sources of water pollution have been addressed in most
implementation plans.
At the time of standards development, most states required no provision
for water quality monitoring. It is noted, however, that today nearly all
states have implemented some form of water quality monitoring or sampling.
3- 4 Comparison of State Implementation Status
A matrix is used to facilitate comparison of state implementation status
(table 2-5); the implementation plans are listed under the following cate-
gories, on a state-by-state basis:
(1) The agency responsible for implementation.
(2) The approval status of the state water quality standards.
(3) The acknowledgement of interim dates for implementation.
(4) Provisions made for monitoring implementation progress.
(5) Provision for reporting such progress.
It is recognized that subsequent to the development of the state implemen-
tation plans, many changes in planning and monitoring have been made.
Table 2-5 reflects only those provisions contained in the plans as originally
written.
State implementation plans have been reviewed for compliance with EPA
guidelines to establish water quality standards. Deficiencies in the stand-
ards that prevented adequate visibility by EPA to determine the degree of
2-15
-------
TABLE 2-5. STATUS OF STATE WATER QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
State
Responsible
Agency
Standards
Approval
Status
Interim
Dates
Monitoring
Progress
Measurement
Provisions For
Progress
Reporting to
EPA
Alabama
Water Improvement
Commission
Partial
Approval
Feb 68
Yes
Waste treatment
systems and
receiving streams
No
Alaska
Dept. of Environ-
mental Conservation
Approved
Nov 71
No
Receiving waters
No
California
State Water
Quality Board
Approved
Jan 72
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
Yes
Connecticut
Water Resources
Commission
Approved
Apr 70
Yes
Receiving waters
No
Delaware
Water Pollution
Commission
Approved
July 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
District of
Dept. of Public
Approved
Yes
Receiving water
No
Columbia
Health
Jan 69
Florida
Dept. of Pollution
Control
Approved
Jan 69
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Georgia
State Water Quality
Control Board
Partial
Approval
July 67
Yes
Not stated
No
-------
Table 2-5. Status of State Water Quality Implementation Plans (Continued)
State
Responsible
Agency
Standards
Approval
Status
Interim
Dates
Monitoring
Progress
Measurement
Provisions For
Progress
Reporting to
EPA
Hawaii
Dept of Health
Approved
June 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
Yes
Elinois
Environmental
Protection Agency
Partially
Approved
Jan 68
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Indiana
Stream Pollution
Control Board
Approved
Jan 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Louisiana
Stream Control
Commission
Partially
Approved
Dec 69
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluent
No
Maine
Environmental
Improvement
Commission
Approved
July 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluent
No
Maryland
Dept. of Water
Resources
Approved
July 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluent
No
Massachusetts
Water Resources
Commission
Approved
Nov 70
Yes
None stated
No
Michigan
Water Resources
Commission
Partially
Approved
Apr 68
No
None stated
Unknown
-------
Table 2-5. Status of State Water Quality Implementation Plans (Continued)
State
Responsible
Agency
Standards
Approval
Status
Interim
Dates
Monitoring
Progress
Measurement
Provisions For
Progress
Reporting to
EPA
Minnesota
Pollution Control
Agency
Partially
Approved
Nov 68
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Mississippi
Air and Water
Pollution Control
Commission
Partially
Approved
May 68
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
New Hampshire
Water Supply and
Pollution Control
Commission
Approved
Dec 70
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
New Jersey
Dept. of Environ-
mental Protection
Approved
July 71
Yes
Not stated
No
New York
Dept. of Environ-
mental Conservation
Approved
Mar 71
No
Receiving waters
and effluents
North Carolina
Dept. of Water and
Air Resource
Approved
Jan 71
No
Receiving waters
and effluent
No
Ohio
Dept. of Health
Partially
Approved
Jan 69
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
-------
Table 2-5. Status of State Water Quality Implementation Plans (Continued)
State
Responsible
Agency
Standards
Approval
Status
Interim
Dates
Monitoring
Progress
Measurement
Provisions For
Progress
Reporting to
EPA
Oregon
Dept. of Environ-
mental Quality
Approved
Jan 70
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Pennsylvania
Dept. of Health
Approved
Oct 71
No
Receiving waters
and effluents
Yes
Rhode Island
Dept. of Health
Approved
Jan 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
South Carolina
State Pollution
Control Authority
Approved
Dec 71
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
Yes
Texas
Water State Quality
Board
Approved
May 69
No
Receiving waters
and effluents
Unknown
Virginia
State Water Control
Board
Approved
Feb 71
Yes
Receiving water
and effluents
No
Washington
Dept. of Ecology
Approved
Jan 68
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
Wisconsin
Dept. of Natural
Resource
Approved
Jan 68
Yes
Receiving waters
and effluents
No
-------
compliance were noted. This undoubtedly results in management problems,
especially at the national level. Shortages of data, lack of adequate detail
and lack of planning uniformity make it difficult to determine if the plans
are being implemented properly. Problems of overlapping jurisdiction
and impact on adjacent states and/or river basins are, at best, confined
by the standards. To overcome these deficiencies, a suitable management
tool is needed to allow all levels of this complex structure to be given high
visibility to all users at all levels. Such a reporting requirement, with
specific levels of detail uniformly specified, could be developed as an
agency requirement, but would perhaps require amendment of the Water
Quality Act of 1965 to ensure its effective implementation.
2. 4 INVENTORY APPROACH
Marine pollution is correlated largely with population and industrial density,
geography and climate. These demographic and geographic factors affect
water quality monitoring requirements. The effect of physical geography
associated with the population requires some special interpretation to de-
fine the differences among the coastal areas. In those areas where the
population is not a problem, the potential damage by pollution is essentially
zero, except for those pollutants resulting from an accident (ship ground-
ing, oil spill) or those pollutants carried in by ocean currents, stream
runoff or atmospheric input. Where there is coastal pollution, industrial
and population density probably is an important factor. Therefore, infor-
mation on these subjects is needed in order to develop the necessary data
inputs for the Phase C National Plan for a coastal water quality monitoring
network. These inventories were also necessary to determine if monitor-
ing efforts were related to potential pollution, socio-political pressure,
availability of funds and resources, research purposes, the need for base-
line data, trends, abatement action and enforcement.
The location, format relevance and the key individual contact for informa-
tion applicable to an overview of coastal water quality monitoring was
ascertained. The amount of data available, categories of storage, method
2-20
-------
and type of retrieval, and/or access to the data were also items to be
determined. To acquire this information available data sources were
accessed to extract pertinent information for the 325 coastal counties on
the following subjects:
• Data Bank Characteristics.
• Environmental Factors Affecting the Coastal Zone.
• Municipal Waste Discharge Inventory.
• Industrial Waste Discharge Inventory.
• Steam,Electric and Nuclear Power Plant Inventory.
• Ocean Dumping Inventory.
• Water Quality Monitoring Inventory
• Inventory of cognizant laboratories, ships and facilities.
This data was then compiled in a computer format for future sorting. This
compilation was carried on utilizing the cross reference file.
2. 5 DATA BANK CHARACTERISTICS INVENTORY
In order to ascertain the extent of current coastal water quality monitoring,
it was essential to inventory and assess all active water quality monitoring
information sources for the coastal zone. Water quality monitoring infor-
mation was evaluated by conducting systematic searches, personal contacts
and interviews with responsible data bank managers within federal, state
and local governmental agencies, and university organizations.
2. 5.1 Summary of Data Banks
A summary of data banks, appendix C, provides an immediate perspective
of the wide jurisdictional diversity of those concerned in coastal pollution
data management and environmental protection. A Data Base Report was
developed for each water quality data bank inventoried. The impact of
user requirements and the capabilities of resource data sharing were con-
sidered as each monitoring facility was identified.
2-21
-------
2. 5. 2 Approach for Evaluation of Data Banks
From the outset, data bank evaluation focused on such factors as: author-
ity level of the individual contacted and identification of his agency role,
type of environmental data in the data bank file (water, air radiation, solid
wastes, pesticides), unique data file names, orientation toward levels of
pollution, geographic scope of data, quantitative data characteristics (water
quality properties/characteristics; values of physical, chemical, biological
measurement; or, in some cases, narrative and textual formats), data base
system processing retrieval factors, optional retrieval considerations from
the data user requirement view-point, extent of system documentation, and
identification of on-going development of new data files and retrieval system
techniques.
The inventory of existing water quality data banks was not restricted by
preconceived criteria as to acceptable or unacceptable data validity, effec-
tive data bank management practices or preordained data user priorities.
The inventory concentrated on the questions of who has what data, where
is it located, and how can it be retrieved.
2. 5. 3 Findings
Coastal zone water quality monitoring is conducted by many agencies, but
few have continuous records with proven baseline information. Govern-
mental marine data banks have been uniquely structured to best serve each
individual governmental agency, and particular user requirements. Within
this group, a number of significant data bank resource sharing projects are
being developed. The Interagency Committee for Marine Environmental
Prediction (ICMAREP), chaired by the Department of Commerce, is an
example of active federal interagency marine environment information
management planning. Subcommittees within ICMAREP are currently
engaged in studies on a variety of environmental problem areas; studies
include marine baseline monitoring; environmental buoy planning; inte-
grated global ocean station systems; marine data collection, exchange and
dissemination and development of marine monitoring techniques.
2-22
-------
2. 5. 4 On-Line Coastal Zone Files
At present, there are only a few on-line, quick-response, time-share,
user-oriented, retrieval systems having coastal zone water quality data on
file. Existing on-line data bank systems with water quality data are main-
tained by EPA, Office of Water Programs, in the STORET file; and by the U. S.
Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, in the National Computer
System.
2. 5. 5 Coastal Water Quality Files (Closed)
A number of water quality files are maintained and operational, but they
are not in computer retrieval systems, nor are they accessible outside the
managing agency. The following files are in this category: Air Force,
Bureau of Reclamation, Coast Guard, Corps of Engineers, and Navy. In
the case of the Air Force and Navy, they each maintain an international
water and air quality monitoring capability. These agencies appear to be
concerned with their mission in coastal environmental protection; however,
their data files are applied solely to their specific pollution abatement
programs. Plans to share their data with any other users outside their
own agency were not in evidence.
2. 5. 6 Batch Process Files
Existing data bank access is generally limited to data retrieval by exper-
ienced terminal operators in a few regional offices, or by personnel as-
signed to the data processing retrieval assistance branches of the central
computer operations. Normally, data users find it necessary to place a
correspondence request with the data bank manager, who in turn prepares
the retrieval request and forwards the batch process retrieval to the
requestor. The Archive Data Bank, National Oceanographic Data Center,
NOAA, maintains limited coastal water quality information in a file of
this type.
2. 5. 7 EPA Water Quality Data File
The EPA storage and retrieval system (STORET) allows the option of
water quality data retrieval in one of several formats, including X-Y graph
2-23
-------
plotting. The EPA computer system consists of approximately 130 ter-
minals, with nearly 100 located in the various EPA Regional offices, and
the balance in various state pollution agencies. Retrieval of water quality
data from the EPA STORET file is of a remote batch entry retrieval type.
With many users operating the low speed (15 characters per second) type
terminals, it is routine practice that the data, which tends to be lengthy,
is printed on the high speed printer at the EPA data center, and mailed to
the requestor rather than taking time to print at the requestor's terminal.
Recent changes in the software command routines of the EPA computer
system have resulted in several training handbook changes, with resulting
"learning cycle" retrieval "bugs. " This, in turn, has resulted in con-
siderable operational retrieval delays.
The following examples point up data retrieval problems:
(1) Second party retrieval can be denied by the originating station.
The retrieval of station water quality data by other than the
originating station can be denied by sponsor's use of the limit-
ing protective code "locking key" at time of data input.
This problem can be resolved by the station sponsor being
identified by a second party and then being provided the "locking
key" code.
(2) Water quality data that has been coded broadly, rather than
uniquely, cannot be retrieved uniquely. For example, if station
data input has been coded as neither station location "tidal" nor
"non-tidal, " and neither "ocean" nor "stream, " the non-coding
result prevents specific retrieval of unique, ocean tidal data.
The station monitoring category, such as tidal, stream, or lake
can be identified manually by geographical determination and
close scrutiny of the station latitude and longitude.
2-24
-------
The EPA STORET file for the Nation, for both coastal and inland waters,
indicates an estimated 3, 000 monitoring stations with a 2 to 3 year history
of collected data. By comparison, the Geological Survey maintains over
5, 600 active water quality monitoring stations. The EPA STORET file
reports data on approximately 100 active 1971-1972 coastal zone water
quality monitoring stations.
2. 5. 8 USGS National Computer Center
The U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) maintains an active on-line data bank
system with over 50 remote terminals interfacing the various regional and
district offices. This system is somewhat unique in that it supports tech-
nical, administrative and communications functions.
Water quality information is provided by the USGS to EPA under contract.
Approximately 45 stations are maintained for EPA in this fashion; data is
supplied to STORET on a monthly basis. The present USGS water quality
data does not, at present, code coastal monitoring stations as either
"coastal or estuarine. " This places a requirement on EPA to properly
define the status of the information.
2. 5. 9 General Conclusions Regarding Data (Systems)
Several conclusions become apparent when considering coastal water
quality monitoring activities with their associated data banks.
• There is a lack of uniformity in water quality state standards,
which precludes clear-cut definitions of critical pollution levels.
• Only a few data banks stress information files with pollution
levels and projected trend analysis.
• Very few of the data banks inventoried demonstrate data proces-
sing practices of testing and verifying the validity of the data
prior to entry into the data bank.
2-25
-------
• Data retrieval events often appear to be documented, but very
few specific user applications are in evidence as to how the data
is used.
• None of the data banks inventoried indicate non-compliance with
existing federal or state water quality standards.
• Among various data banks, the retrieval data format and infor-
mation presentations appear to be inconsistent.
• Only a few of the agencies with coastal water quality mission
requirements have ongoing, long-range data bank and information
system development; rather, most agencies appear to be reacting
to short-term problems.
2. 5. 10 Regional Data Center Program
Several regional data center programs are being developed; the participat-
ing agencies reflect awareness of the broad scope of the inherent inter-
related factors that comprise the total coastal environment. Each of these
regional project plans propose a regional data management center, where
the participating agencies provide their portion of the source data and, in
turn, receive water quality data that meets their agency requirement; this
is a form of resource pooling.
There is increasing development of data centers through interagency co-
operation between federal, state and local governmental agencies. Data
sharing is most apparent in the following environmental aspects of water
quality:
(1) Water resources and planning.
(2) Water quality standards and monitoring.
(3) Municipal waste water management, and treatment plant con-
struction planning and operation.
2-26
-------
(4) Industrial waste water discharge management.
(5) Public health and recreation.
(6) Regional land use management.
(7) Commercial and sports fisheries.
(8) Food, fiber and transportation development.
(9) Electrical power resource planning.
At this time (1972) there is pending legislation to create a National Data
System. Hopefully, this program will allow efficient sharing of data re-
sources among environmental scientists and prevent the duplications
involved in copying environmental data. There is however, only limited
acceptance for this measure.
2. 6 REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE COASTAL
ZONE
In reviewing the environmental factors that may affect the conditions for
coastal water quality monitoring, we found that coastal areas could be sub-
divided into smaller, more manageable subunits. In our interest to estab-
lish the effect of the environment on monitoring, we found that there was
not a clear coastal county, state or regional division which would allow full
relationships to be determined. Ways were sought to best relate EPA and
other agency/state monitoring programs to a common geo-environ denomi-
nator. A set of oceanic environmental regions was established as shown
in figure 2-4. The National Estuarine Pollution Study (NEPS) defined bio-
physical regions in the coastal zone of the United States. These regions
were described primarily as estuaries, semi-enclosed bays and lagoons;
little information was supplied with respect to the intervening shoreline.
The Great Lakes were excluded from NEPS consideration.
The descriptions of the biophysical regions as presented in NEPS are
presented in table 2-6, and are an adequate description of the coastal zone.
However, because of the predominance of data available only on a county
basis, we were forced to utilize the coastal county as the smallest
2-27
-------
PU6,BT
SOU/V£>
AJO&rM
FAC/P/C.
CZAJTK.AL
CALjfZO/eAi/A
<5 UL-f=
Of?
GBO&GIA
X
SauTt-tejZK!
CAueo&Jm
ALA S4C-A
CBK/T/iAt 7
1
ALASKA
• S-
4sou7V6fm 1
ALA34ZA 1
/*+C/s
Figure 2-4. Coastal Environmental Regions of the United States
-------
TABLE 2-6. DOMINATING ENVIRONMENTAL
FACTORS OF THE ESTUARINE ZONE OF THE UNITED STATES
FROM THE NATIONAL ESTUARINE POLLUTION STUDY (1)
Environment*! lector
Middle Atlantic
Chesapeake Bay
Continental Shell width range (statute miles), bottom typo. .150-250, irregular, rocky... 50-100, smoothly sloping,
lagoon off major river.
Ocean currents i influenced by
Temperature (F.):
Mean
Summer
Winter
Salinity (percent):
Mean..
Dry season
Wet season
Coastline structure
Labrador Current
46
65
32
3.03
3.1
2.9....
Rocky, very irregular,
many embayments.
River flow:
Runoff per mile of tidal shoreline (CFS) 16. . .
Number of major river basins 5
Total runoff (CFS) 72.000
Sedimentation quantity of suspended load (1,000 tons/ No data: sedimentation
yO
Climate: •
Temperature (F)
Mean..
Summer .
Winter..
Precipitation (in ).
Total
Snow, tee
Tide: > Type.
Mean range (ft.) ..
Labrador Current..
54.
73-
36
not severe problem,
great amount of rock.
45
80
12
43
7 2
Equal, semidiurnal..
10
3.15
3.18
3.13
Smooth, many large em-
bayments.
15.
6
106,000...
15,300
Not applicable
59
80
38. .
1.37
1.60
1.10
Very irregular, exten-
sive marshes on east
side.
15. .
6
79,800...
8,640
.54 58
.84 87
.25 .30
42 44
.16 23
Equal, semidiurnal Equal, semidiurnal..
5 2. .
. 30-70, smoothly sloping
72.
87
50
3.55
3.60....
. 3.25
Smooth, low lying, exten-
sive marshes.
16
12
154,000
58.100..
66
92
40
50 . .
0 .
Equal, semidiurnal..
3 10 E< Florida, Puerto
Rico, Virgin Islands—
190-Nortn of Florida
Keys.
Gull Stream.
80.
87.
71.
. 3.57.
3.63.
3.49.
Irregular, mangroves, coral
and rocks.
3
0.
11,500.
No data.
76.
89.
64
46
0.
Equal, semidiurnal.
Environmental factor
Gulf of Mexico
Pacific Southwest
Pacific Northwest
Continental Shelf width range (statute milts), bottom 65-140, smoothly sloping..
typ«-
Ocean currents' influenced by Water forming Gull Stream.
Temperature (F.):
Mean 73
Summer.. 87..
Winter 54.
Salinity (tiercent):
Mean 3.23
Dry season 3.70
Dry season 3.03
Coastline structure Smooth, low lying with
barrier Islands, marshes.
River flow:
Runoff per mile of tidal shoreline (CFS) 52
Number of major river basins 21
Total runoft (CFS) 799,000
Sedimentation quantity of suspended load(l,000 tons/yr.). 362,600
Climate: '
Temperature (F.):
Mean 69.
Summer 91
Winter 45
Precipitation (in.);
Total 55
Snow, iee 0
Tide:»Type Diurnal
Mean range (It.) 2
. 2-20, average about 10. . 9-38, with indentations on 30 150 on southeast and
(he outer edge. south coast, 400 on
west coast.
California Current California-Aleutian Current. Alaska Current Mid-Pacific circulation
0, volcanic island rising
Irom south.
60
69
56.
336
3.38
3.33
High land close to shore,
bluffs, - - -
. 51.
. 56.
. 45.
. 30.8
. 3.25
. 2.85
.. 42.
.. 55.
.30.
s and beaches.
High land close to shore,
Bluffs and beaches.
. 3.19 .
. 3.21
. 3.12
All glaciated. Irregular
except in Northwest.
. 77.
. 81.
73.
. 3.
3.
. 3.
Steep, irregular with
teaches.
27 .. 77 No data No data.
8 9 16 0.
83 400 368,000 ... No data No data.
24,000 127,000 No data No data.
. 55..
. 79..
. 35..
. 40..
. 64..
.5...
. 75.
33.
. 67.
61
76.
43
12 40 56 24-14.
0 9 90 0.
Unoquat semidiurnal Unequal semidiurnal Unequal semidiurnal Unequal semidiurnal
5. 7 20 2.
' Data are typical near-coastal values for the region, except lor Chesapeake Bay, where data are
lor the middle of the bay.
* Data are for a point typical of the radon,
i Data given are for southeast and south coasts only.
Roferonco: The National Estuarine Inventory.
Data sources: U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Weather Bureau.
2-29
-------
geographic unit for the national overview information and have presented
the statistical data to this level. The detailed data of our environmental
inventory has been computerized to pro vide a portion of the digital coastal -
zone cross reference list, and are presented in appendix D. This data was
subsequently processed to provide the desired geographic and/or environ-
mental information with cross linking geocodes, such as drainage basin
numbers, state and county numbers, EPA regions, estuarine register
areas, environmental regions and ocean regions. The significance of this
data is discussed in section 3 of this report.
2. 7 MUNICIPAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
It was found that nearly 3,400 municipal waste facilities discharge waste
in excess of 9, 300 million gallons daily. This effluent receives different
degrees of treatment ranging from none to tertiary before being discharged
into the coastal zone.
The prime source of data for this inventory was the EPA municipal waste
discharge file. However, some 767 records were eliminated from the
inventory due to lack of any information other than the name of the facility.
Complete data was obtained for all records which lacked some information,
but could be determined to serve populations in excess of 100, 000. Records
with partial data were estimated in order to complete the inventory. The
machine readable data obtained was aggregated by type of treatment within
coastal county under the assumption that this waste, while not discharged
directly to the marine environment, will inevitably impact coastal water
quality. Some sewage sludge is barged farther offshore, and such infor-
mation is not included in this inventory. Table 2-7 summarizes coastal
waste discharges, and a detailed report is presented in appendix E which
also includes a discussion of the estimating and record purging processes.
Totals for the entire coastal zone presented below show about 75.1 million
people, or 92 percent of the coastal population, is served by municipal
sewage systems. Based on the average daily flow, the typical individual
generates 124 gallons of waste water per day.
2-30
-------
TABLE 2-7. COASTAL MUNICIPAL WASTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Type
Treatment
No. of
Disch
Pop Served
X 1000
Avg Daily
Flow, MGD
Designed
Flow, MGD
Percent
Esti-
mated*^)
None
60
670.79
102.22
129.41
0.1
Minor
55
2, 636. 66
1,120. 70
1, 255. 81
0.0
Primary
602
28,063.19
3, 205. 49
3,838.49
0.9
Intermediate
16
2, 621.33
357. 21
429. 68
0.0
Secondary
1,856
40,037.97
4, 320. 52
5,979. 84
3.7
Tertiary
35
1, 787.03
302.07
347. 74
0.0
Total
2, 624
75,817.09
9,408.21
11,981.03
2.3
Percent (1) of Total
None
2
1
1
1
Minor
2
3
12
10
Primary
23
37
34
32
Intermediate
1
3
4
4
Secondary
71
53
46
50
Tertiary
1
2
3
3
(1) Rounded to the nearest whole percent.
(2) Missing data percent estimated.
Primary and secondary treatment serves nearly 90 percent of the coastal
population and represents 80 percent of the average daily discharge. It is
also interesting to note that 71 percent of the dischargers on record have
secondary treatment, but that they only serve 53 percent of the population,
and account for only 46 percent of the daily discharge flow. This confirms
that the information eliminated in the inventory was primarily that from
the smaller, lower-grade dischargers.
2-31
-------
2. 8 INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
The industrial waste discharge data presented in this report is derived
from the 1970 census data. Actual values for individual cases may vary
from the estimated value, but the data is statistically sound for the national
overview.
Since manufacturing water use data is available from the Census Bureau,
aggregated to the state level, it was necessary to isolate discharges to the
county level in order to obtain totals for the coastal zone. This was ac-
complished by using available data on the distribution of the five major
water use industries, at the county level, to proportion the state level
water discharge data among the coastal counties. National totals for the
coastal zone are shown in table 2-8. Industrial discharge data at the state
level is presented in appendix F, along with a detailed explanation of the
algorithm used to generate the table.
TABLE 2-8. COASTAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY
(Total Water Discharged (MGD) in 1970)
Discharged
To:
Food
Products
Paper
Chemical
Petroleum
Primary
Metals
Total
Public Sewers
224.53
53. 51
235.85
11. 23
133.95
659.07
Surface Water
246. 90
1,182. 54
1,129. 37
813. 02
2, 544. 04
5,915.91
Tidewater
284.57
1, 226.99
4, 587. 88
975. 26
1,294.85
8,369. 52
Ground
61.23
10. 96
22. 51
9.82
27. 81
132. 33
Total
817. 21
2,473. 96
5, 975. 63
1,809. 33
4,000. 66
15,076.88
Treated
209.94
864.59
656. 67
1,337.04
1, 363. 70
4,431. 95
Percent (1) of Water Discharged in 1970
Public Sewers
27
2
4
1
3
4
Surface Water
30
48
19
45
64
39
Tidewater
35
50
77
54
32
56
Ground
7
0
0
1
1
1
Total
5
16
40
12
27
100
Treated
26
35
11
74
34
29
(1) Rounded to the nearest whole percent.
2-32
-------
In the coastal counties, only 29 percent of the water discharged receives
any treatment; thus, nearly 70 percent of the total is untreated. Also,
within the coastal counties 95 percent of the industrial waste water is dis-
charged directly or indirectly into coastal zone waters (tidewaters 55 per-
cent and surface waters 40 percent).
Significant Discharges
Chemical and primary metals are the most significant discharges as they
represent about two-thirds of the total, followed by paper, petroleum and
food products, in that order. This may be fortunate from the standpoint of
monitoring and controlling pollution because of the tendency of the major
industrial dischargers to be very large and concentrated rather than small
and distributed. Thus, although the problems may be large in magnitude,
at least they tend to be small in geographic scope.
2. 9 STEAM ELECTRIC AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS INVENTORY
Thermal discharge data is very difficult to obtain as no national machine-
readable files were located for this information. The National Estuarine
Inventory file yielded only 26 thermal discharge records (23 from Hawaii,
3 from Texas). Thus, prime input for this survey was obtained manually
from data supplied by the Federal Power Commission for plants greater
than 25 MW. Plant names, locations and utility names were also ex-
tracted for 942 steam-electric stations operated by 398 companies in the
contiguous United States (2). Additional data for nuclear power plants was
obtained from (3,4).
Our inventory includes 240 steam-electric and nuclear power plants that
discharge heated condenser cooling water from their plants into the coastal
environment. A standard computer input data form was utilized and the
printout is presented in appendix G. The inventory contains plant name
and location, plant capacity, average volume of cooling water, design
temperature rise, state temperature standards, maximum water temper-
ature in the winter and summer, rate of flow through the condenser,
average flow of the receiving waters and the type of plant.
2-33
-------
The Atomic Energy Commission surveyed the nuclear power industry in
1969 (3). Forty-three licensees and applicants for nuclear plants responded.
There are 54 sites located in 25 states. Of the 54 sites, 17 are located
either on seacoasts or on bays, sounds, gulfs, rivers, or estuaries near
the ocean; 11 are located on large, natural inland lakes; 25 are located on
rivers (several of which will utilize large, man-made reservoirs); and 1
is a "dry" site from which discharges will not be made into an existing
stream. As of December 1971, 12 nuclear power plants (5,003.8 MW) are
operational; 36 are under construction in the coastal zone, including the
Great Lakes.
These plants under construction from 1972 to 1979 will add almost 32, 629
MW of generating capacity to the coastal zone and will consequently con-
tribute additional amounts of thermal discharge water that will have to be
considered in future water quality monitoring programs.
2. 10 OCEAN DUMPING INVENTORY
The disposal of wastes has, up until rather recently, been primarily on
land; however, expanding population and industrial growth during the
Twentieth Century have necessitated searches for alternative disposal
areas. The oceans were the alternative and have become the disposal site
for many of our wastes including sewage, chemicals, garbage, and toxic
materials. Ocean dumping is now practiced worldwide and use of the ocean
as a waste receptacle is increasing; therefore, problems concerning dump-
ing are really international in scope. Dumping has reached a point in this
country where public concern, scientific knowledge, and administrative
capability all suggest early remedial action; sound management must be
taken at the international level as well as by the United States.
The importance of the oceans cannot be overemphasized as they cover over
70 percent of the earth's surface — equal to approximately 140 million
square miles. Critical to maintaining the world's environment, the oceans
contribute to the oxygen/carbon dioxide balance in the atmosphere, affect
2-34
-------
global climate, and provide the base for the world's hydrologic system.
Oceans are extremely valuable to man providing, among other necessities,
a place to dispose of some wastes. At present, ocean dump sites do exist,
but their proper use is a new subject. The present goal by most federal
agencies is to reduce ocean dumping to a minimum.
The purpose of this study is to secure information on current ocean and
Great Lakes disposal operations; locations of dumping sites, descriptions
of types of wastes and amounts and whether any monitoring or surveillance
programs are being conducted. The Army Corps of Engineers presently
has the responsibility for granting permits for the dumping of wastes in the
ocean. These permits authorize the dumping of wastes in specific dump
areas according to the nature of the waste material.
Some ocean dumping is believed to be occurring in locations other than the
prescribed dump areas. The extent and type of the violations are not ex-
actly known because of the present lack of a suitable monitoring system,
but it is assumed that the violations are rarely attributable to safety con-
siderations or emergency conditions. The convenience and comfort of the
captain or crew are possible prime factors. Rough seas and generally bad
weather are consequently likely conditions for early dumping. It is ex-
pected that faulty navigation occasionally may result in a dump in other
than the licensed location.
The pending Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, when
enacted, will have the effect of giving permit authority for ocean transpor-
tation and disposal of waste material to EPA, except for dredge spoil.
Permits for dredge spoil disposal remain with the Army Corps of Engin-
eers, but with final approval from EPA. Other aspects of the legislation
include research and monitoring efforts with regard to oceanic waste dis-
posal, and marine research sanctuaries.
2-35
-------
Information used in this report was collected from several sources. All
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers District Offices and EPA Regional
Offices responsible for U. S. coastal areas were contacted. Replies were
received from most of those contacted. Other facilities, including state
agencies and universities, were also contacted.
2.10.1 Description of Types of Wastes and Amounts
During 1968, approximately 62 million tons (5) of wastes were dumped in
the oceans by the United States. The first step to undertake in attacking
the problem of ocean dumping is to identify the types of wastes being dis-
posed of, the amounts of material and the locations involved. Wastes
transported aboard barges and ships to ocean disposal sites from 20 major
U. S. coastal cities have been summarized into eight categories, and are
ranked according to total volume (5):
Dredge spoils
Industrial wastes
Sewage sludge
Construction and demolition debris (commonly known as cellar dirt)
Refuse
Explosives and chemical munitions
Miscellaneous materials
Radioactive wastes
Further information regarding the amounts of wastes dumped in the ocean
in 1968, and their associated costs, is presented in table 2-9. A descrip-
tion of waste type, their respective volumes and problems associated with
their ocean disposal follows.
Dredge Spoils
The major disposal of wastes to the oceans is in the form of dredge spoils,
which are the solid materials removed from the bottom of water bodies
generally for the purpose of maintaining or improving navigation channels
2-36
-------
TABLE 2-9. SUMMARY OF TYPE, AMOUNT AND ESTIMATED COSTS OF WASTES
DISPOSED OF IN PACIFIC, ATLANTIC, AND GULF COAST WATERS FOR THE YEAR 1968*
From Reference (5)
Pacific Coast
Atlantic Coast
Gulf Coast
Total
Total
Waste type
Annual
tonnage
Estimated
costS
Annual
tonnage
Estimated
cost $
Annual
tonnage
Estimated
cost S
Annual
tonnage
Estimated
cost
%
Tonnage
%
Cost
Dredging spoils
8,320,000
3,608.000
30,880,000
16,810,000
13,000,000
3,228,000
52,200,000
23,646,000
84
63.5
Industrial wastes
bulk
containerized
981.000
300
991,000
16,000
3,011,000
2,200
5,406,000
17,000
690,000
6.000
1,592,000
171,000
4,682,000
8,500
7,989,000
204,000
8
<1
21.7
<1
Refuse, garbage'^)
26,000
392,000
26,000
392,000
<1
1
Sewage sludge^)
4,477,000
4,433,000
4,477,000
4,433,000
7
12
Miscellaneous
200
3,000
200
3,000
<1
<1
Construction and
demolition debris
574,000
430,000
574,000
430,000
1
1
Explosives
15,200
235,000
15,200
235,000
<1
<1
Total, all wastes^)
9,327,500
5,010,000
38,959,400
27,331,000
13,696,000
4,991,000
61,982,900
37,332,000
100
100
(a) Includes 200,000 tons of fly ash.
(b) At San Diego 4700 tons vessel garbage at $280,000 per year were discontinued in November 1968.
(c) Tonnage on wet basis. Assuming average 4.5 percent dry solids, this amounts to approximately 200,000 tons dry solids per year being barged to sea.
(d) Radioactive wastes omitted. There were no dumps during 1968. Average Annual disposal in 1969-1970 was 4.2 tons.
(e) Estimated costs were increased proportionately for each area from the original Tonnage/cost data.
* Revised and updated by James L. Verber, FDA.
-------
and harbors. These solid materials consist of sediment containing organic
and inorganic matter, with various concentrations of alluvial sand, silt,
clay and municipal or industrial waste sludges. Dredge spoils account for
84 percent (52 million tons) by weight of all ocean dumping. The Corps of
Engineers estimates that about 34 percent (19. 5 million tons) of this
material is polluted. Contamination results from decomposition of pollu-
tants from industrial, municipal, agricultural and other sources on the
bottom of bodies of water. Dissolved oxygen levels can be seriously re-
duced by large quantities of these oxygen-demanding materials. Reducing
the oxygen level in the receiving waters can adversely affect the aquatic
organisms to a point where they cannot survive. Redistribution of toxic
materials is another factor in the disposal of dredge spoils (5).
Some of the dredging operations are conducted by the Corps. The re-
mainder is done by private contractors under a Corps permit. Spoils are
usually deposited in water less than 100 feet deep.
Sewage Sludge
Sewage sludge, which is about 55 percent organic matter (6), is the solid
waste byproduct of municipal sewerage treatment processes. Most sewage
sludge is disposed of on land, or is incinerated. Small amounts (4. 5 mil-
lion tons) are currently dumped at sea, and the majority of this (4. 0 million
tons) is dumped in the Atlantic Ocean off New York Harbor (7). As far as
is known, no dumping of sewage sludge occurs in the Pacific Ocean or the
Gulf of Mexico. Sewage sludge contains significant amounts of oxygen-
demanding materials and pathogenic bacteria.
Industrial Wastes
Approximately 9 percent (4. 7 million tons) of industrial wastes (table 2-9)
were dumped at sea in 1968. Industrial wastes vary greatly in both physi-
cal characteristics and toxicity. The dangers resulting from the severe
effects of these wastes present the greatest potential hazard to the total
marine environment of any of the types of ocean-disposed wastes. The
2-38
-------
types of contaminants in industrial wastes vary greatly because of the diver-
sity of materials and production processes involved in industry. Types of
industrial wastes are:
(1) Refinery wastes.
(2) Pulp and paper mill.
(3) Oil drilling wastes.
(4) Spent acids.
(5) Chemical wastes.
(6) Waste oil.
Refuse
Solid wastes consist of food, paper, metals, plastics, glass, textiles, and
similar wastes. In the past, several cities have used oceanic dump sites
for refuse, but problems with the onshore drift of floatables led to the re-
duction of this practice. With the potentially satisfactory methods for
baling and sinking more consideration is now being given to the disposal of
refuse in the ocean. Relatively small amounts of refuse (26,000 tons;
table 2-9) were disposed of at sea and dumping of these materials occurred
on the Pacific Coast. These wastes originate primarily from canneries
and from commercial and naval vessels.
Construction and Demolition Debris
Approximately 574,000 tons (table 2-9) of this kind of waste were disposed
of at sea in 1968. New York City is, at the present time, the only area
disposing of this waste in sufficient quantities. Also known as "cellar dirt, "
these wastes consist of stone, wood, masonry, tile, plastic, and excava-
tion dirt. These materials are generally inert and nontoxic.
Explosives and Chemical Munitions
Obsolete or unserviceable shells, mines, solid rocket fuels, propellents
and chemical warfare agents have been disposed of in deep water for many
years. Approximately 19,000 tons (7) of explosives and munitions have
2-39
-------
been disposed of since 1964 by the Navy in obsolete hulks. The Govern-
ment disposal of these materials in the ocean has been discontinued.
Radioactive Wastes
Disposal of radioactive materials no longer occurs in the ocean. Oceanic
disposal was never used for high-level wastes or highly concentrated fis-
sion products from reprocessing irradiated nuclear fuel elements. Dis-
posal at sea of other radioactive wastes was essentially discontinued about
ten years ago, because of the opening of land burial facilities.
Miscellaneous Materials
This includes various types of rejected or contaminated products, such as
foodstuffs, appliances and small batches of toxic wastes, such as pesticides
and complex chemical solutions. Relatively small amounts of this category
of wastes have been dumped at sea. Exact figures are difficult to obtain
because the disposal operations are not often sanctioned by any regulatory
agency.
Appendix H presents a listing of dump sites in use as of June, 1972, as
reported by the various responding agencies.
2.10. 2 Locations of Disposal Areas
In 1970, there were approximately 250 disposal sites off U. S. coasts (see
table 2-10 and reference (7)). It is estimated (6) that only 120 of these
sites were in use at that time; also, the number of sites does not include
those in the Great Lakes region.
Most sites were chosen, years ago, because of convenience, such as
proximity to harbors. The sites were, usually, several square miles in
area, and located 6 to 15 miles off shore.
2-40
-------
TABLE 2-10. OCEAN DUMPING SITES
1968
1972
Coastal Area
Number
Percent
of
Total
Active
Corps
Disposal
Permits
Percent
of
Number Total
Atlantic Coast
122
50
136
68 45
Gulf Coast
56
22
50
29 19
Pacific Coast
68
28
71
31 20
Great Lakes
None Reported
24 16
Total
246
100
257
152 100
A reduction in ocean dumping volume, compared to amounts reported for
1968, has occurred along the Pacific Coast, This is also probably true
for the Gulf Coast and, possibly, the Atlantic Coast although no total
amounts have been available for the past several years for a valid com-
parison. Recommendations for banning or curbing future ocean dumping
activities {reference { 7 )) were strongly endorsed by the President, and
subsequently have formed the basis for the Marine Protection Research
and Sanctuaries Act of 1972.
Information acquired during this study shows that the total number of
active oceanic dump sites presently being used is approximately 128,
about the same as in use in 1970. The total number of dump sites when
the Great Lakes are included is 152. (In this report clean dredge spoils
dumped on beaches for restoration purposes are not included as a dump
site.)
Contacts with all U. S. Army Corps of Engineers District Offices and EPA
Regional Offices, who are responsible for U. S. coastal areas, have re-
vealed a substantial decrease in the number of ocean dumping sites
2-41
-------
currently reported. At the present time dredge spoils are the predomi-
nant type of waste being dumped off the U. S. coast.
Oceanic and Great Lakes disposal sites are summarized in appendix H.
2.10. 3 Summary of Dumping Operations
All Corps of Engineers District Offices and EPA Regional Offices respon-
sible for coastal zones were contacted to obtain information on monitoring
at ocean disposal sites.
This study has revealed very little monitoring of water quality at ocean
disposal sites. Sporadic special study sampling programs have been con-
ducted at various locations along the U. S. coast by the Corps of Engineers,
by state pollution control agencies and private industries.
New York City is the only known area where marine waste disposal opera-
tions are subject to regular surveillance while in transit to the disposal
area. In order to ensure that barge operators are disposing their wastes
in designated areas, the U. S. Corps of Engineers' patrol boats accompany
them to the disposal site on a random basis.
From the data reported, with the exception of dredge spoil, the total ton-
nage of materials dumped in the ocean by the United States should decline
from about 10 million torts in 1968 to 8 million tons in 1972 ( 8 ).
Atlantic Coast - Dumping (excluding dredge spoils) of wastes has been
significantly reduced in the past few years. Six dumping operations occur
off the Atlantic Coast, particularly in the New York Bight area, including
sewage sludge (New York, Philadelphia), waste acids (New York and
Delaware), construction and demolition debris (New York), chemical
wastes (New York, New Jersey), and wrecks.
2-42
-------
Gulf Coast — Some industrial wastes may be dumped in 1972. The other
material to be dumped will be dredge spoil.
Pacific Coast — It was anticipated that by 1972, the only dumping opera-
tions in the Pacific Ocean (excluding dredge spoils) with any possibility of
being continued consists of about 20,000 tons of cannery wastes, which
are dumped at sea on a seasonal basis between June and October.
Great Lakes Region - The only dumping reported is dredge spoils.
2. 11 WATER QUALITY MONITORING INVENTORY
The prime source of data on water quality monitoring activities used in
this report was the machine readable (magnetic tape) file maintained by
the U. S. Geological Survey's Office of Water Data Coordination (OWDC).
Although each record in this file contains a designator such as Stream,
Estuary, etc., a quick examination of the catalog reveals only a very
small percentage of monitoring stations classified estuarine. However,
many monitoring stations of interest to the coastal zone are located at or
near the mouth of a river or stream (typically at the first bridge) and are
given a "stream" or other designation in the catalog.
Coastal Zone Data
"Coastal Zone" data from this file was, therefore, screened based on a
list of coastal minor drainage basins (specified by OWDC map number and
letter) which are generally smaller than the coastal counties. This proved
more nearly representative of the true coastal zone, although certain in-
land stream records are undoubtedly included. Even these stations may
be of importance, since they monitor waters which shortly flow into an
estuary or coastal area.
Case Study Information Augmentation
This data has been augmented with information collected during the Phase
B case studies and then summarized to the state and regional level, as
2-43
-------
presented in appendix I - Water Quality Monitoring Inventory. The fol-
lowing tables present coastal zone monitoring data summarized at the
regional level.
Table 2-11 presents totals at the EPA regional level for the number of
measurements made per year, the average number of parameters moni-
tored at a station, and the number of active stations in 1960 and 1970,
including the net change over the decade. Region V leads the coastal zone
in the number of stations and number of measurements. In addition, it
has shown the greatest growth over the decade - some 359 percent! Most
regions showed an increase in monitoring activity with a national average
of 59 percent, but Region II actually shows a 30 percent drop in the num-
ber of active stations. This anomaly remains unexplained.
Table 2-12 shows the total number of parameters monitored by all stations
within each region, along with the percent of the total. The regions are
rather consistent in the percent of physical and chemical parameters
monitored, with a somewhat inconsistent ratio among the biologicals and
sediments.
Table 2-13 is similar to table 2-12, but covers only the seven parameters
of prime interest in estuaries.
2.12 INVENTORY OF LABORATORIES, FACILITIES AND VESSELS
The management of a coastal water quality program requires information
about the available capabilities to perform monitoring and analytical ser-
vices. The laboratory and facilities inventory was accomplished to acquire
the necessary information.
Laboratories
There are 33 coastal states (assuming Washington, D. C., Puerto Rico,
and Guam as "states") within the coastal zone. Table 2-14 was assembled
to quantify the locations of laboratory facilities in the coastal states. The
2-44
-------
TABLE 2-11. REGIONAL SUMMARY - MONITORING ACTIVITY
EPA
Region
Measurements
Per Year
AVG
Params
Per
Station
1970
1960
Change
1
113,513
7
108
77
31
2
188,389
10
280
401
-121
3
290, 608
9
148
110
38
4
507. 728
9
1,088
599
489
5
685,659
9
589
123
466
6
214,879
5
118
100
18
9
527, 006
9
316
239
77
10
577, 144
6
197
143
54
Total
3, 104,926
9*
2,844
1, 792
1,052
Percent of Total**
** *
****
1
4
78
4
4
40
2
6
111
10
22
-30
3
9
100
5
6
35
4
16
100
38
33
82
5
22
100
21
7
379
6
7
56
4
6
18
9
17
100
11
13
32
10
19
67
7
8
38
Notes:
* Average
** Rounded to nearest whole number
*** Percent of average
**** percent change 1960 to 1970
2-45
-------
TABLE 2-12. REGIONAL SUMMARY -
GENERAL PARAMETERS MONITORED
EPA
Region
Number of Parameters Monitored By Major Parameter
Groups and Percentage of Total
Phys
Chem
Bio
Sed
Total
1
345
42
432
52
42
5
6
1
825
100%
2
1, 279
42
1,397
46
345
11
10
1
3,031
100%
3
598
42
663
47
125
9
25
2
1,411
100%
4
3,970
40
5,235
52
648
6
189
2
10,042
100%
5
2, 204
38
2,836
49
707
12
50
1
5,824
100%
6
296
44
311
46
23
3
49
7
679
100%
9
1, 207
42
1,152
40
252
9
281
9
2,892
100%
10
556
43
565
44
130
10
31
3
1, 282
100%
Total
10,455
40
12, 591
49
2,272
9
641
2
25,959
100%
2-46
-------
TABLE 2-13. REGIONAL SUMMARY -
SPECIFIC PARAMETERS MONITORED
EPA
Region
Number of Parameters Monitored and Percent of Total
Temp
Cond
PH
DO
BOD
Turb
Colif
Total
1
74
22
49
15
87
26
31
9
12
4
42
12
40
12
335
100%
2
265
18
90
6
240
16
231
16
233
16
159
11
249
17
1,467
100%
3
146
19
65
8
175
23
91
12
88
12
82
11
114
15
761
100%
4
991
20
638
13
1,136
22
908
18
377
8
453
9
415
8
4,918
100%
5
505
19
404
15
537
21
320
12
177
7
307
12
359
14
2, 609
100%
6
93
29
58
18
70
22
41
13
12
4
26
8
20
6
320
100%
9
295
24
230
19
249
19
156
13
49
4
204
16
59
5
1,242
100%
10
193
25
110
14
142
18
118
15
72
9
40
5
106
14
781
100%
Total
2, 562
21
1,644
13
2, 636
21
1,896
15
1,020
8
1,313
11
1,362
11
12,433
100%
2-47
-------
TABLE 2-14. LABORATORY FACILITIES IN U. S.
NLGICN I
EPA
NQAA
ltfJlAIUIiJG
FLULKAL S'lATE
LDUCftTI(ll/vL
TOTALS
Maine
;^lew Hanpshire
Mass achusetts
Hhocie Island
Connecticut
ifcqion Totals 4
1
1
1
2
1
1
13
6
1
10
5
')
31
HiGICN II
Wew York
,«w Jersey
Puerto Rico
Rjqion Totals
2
1
3
1
4
11
0
1
14
21
5
2
28
H^GIQJ III
Delaware
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Virginia
Wasnington DC
Iteqion Totals j
1
4
1
5
11
2
3
2
10
2
3
13
5
8
31
I-fcGIGu IV
iJartli Carolina 1
South Carolina 1
Georgia 2
Florida 2
Alabama 2
Mississi^i 1
3
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
3
3
12
4
1
0
4
5
7
1
2
10
11
10
25
9
8
Itegion Totals 9
10
24
73
2-48
-------
Table 2-14. Laboratory Facilities in U. S. (Continued)
i-iPA
WOAA
HU1AI1JING
FUULKAL Sl'AIE
EIXJCATICIJAL
TOTALS
HLGIUJ V
Ohio
Micnigan
Iiidiuiia
Illinois
Wisconsin
Ilinncsotu
1
1
i tjqioii Totals 1U
iaJGICu VI
Louisiana
TOXOS X
iijgioa Totals 1
RUGIQU E>
California 3
hawaii
legion Totals 3
HLGIQ-j X
Alaska 1
Washington 3
Oregon 1
itegion Totals 5
1
1
4
1
GMUL) TCfi'AL
40
1
4
1
2d
1
1
3
1
4
4b
1
2
1
4
j
12
17
10
1
11
1
3
3
7
76
0
1
2
3
17
1
ia
l
6
3
10
99
G
7
1
4
1
3
22
b
lb
26
42
4
46
7
17
8
32
289
2-49
-------
detailed inventory is presented in appendix J. The table allows for cate-
gories consisting of EPA Regions and states in one column and EPA, NOAA.
remaining governmental, state and university facilities across the top,
with the numbers representing the number of cities with a facility reduced
to the city level. As an example, if one agency had several facilities
listed in New York City and it was not possible to determine if they were
actually separate or combined facilities, then the table would only show
one entry for that agency. This applies only in the Federal Agency num-
bers since it was possible to separate state and university facilities within
any one city.
States canvassed in the Phase B case study areas may show a greater num-
ber of facilities because of the personal visits and more intensive docum-
tation gathered for the case study area states.
The inventory is broken down into various federal and state agencies, and
universities by EPA regions. Within the regions, the entries are listed in
an ascending GSA state and county numerical order. The information that
is presented in the tables has been derived from numerous publications,
from case study investigations and by telephone calls to areas where publi-
cations did not cover the necessary information. The proper name for
each laboratory or facility and the agency under which it functions, be-
cause of the recent and still changing federal structure in the coastal and
water quality analyses field, may not be the common name or the name
recognized at the local level. However, we believe the most recent title
and address have been obtained.
Vessels
A listing of vessels was readily available on fairly large to large vessels
in federal and university service and, to a lesser degree, private research
vessels in existing references (9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Informa-
tion on smaller vessels was not available in the literature. This section
only clarifies the referenced bibliography; the tables of information on avail-
able vessels included in the bibliography are not reproduced for this report.
2-50
-------
The types of vessels to be used on a sampling program of national scope
will quite necessarily vary as the coastal physical regions and geography
varies. For example, a vessel for use in a bayou will not resemble one
that is used in coastal waters of the northeastern seaboard. Most likely,
a large portion of the work can be done (and is now done) from vessels not
larger than 35-40 feet, and even as small as 16-20 feet. For work on the
open coast in all weather conditions, the requirements increase the size
of vessel to something larger than 45 feet. Most vessels that appear in
the referenced documents are fairly large research vessels that generally
are suitable for deep ocean work. Also, the availability (except for private
vessels) of most of these vessels is usually expressed in terms of a "not-
to-interfere" basis. Clearly this does not allow scheduling of any long-
term monitoring programs. Even if schedules are known years in advance
they are never firm, and can change drastically from month to month.
Gaining the use of most federally operated vessels by a different govern-
ment agency is difficult at best, and because of the size of the vessels,
usually too costly for the benefits gained.
Greater co-operation could be expected from educational and private inter-
ests as long as (in the case of universities) the program fits in with exist-
ing research, and/or provides incentive through profits or expansion of
programs.
In areas where some monitoring sampling work is being done, it is reason-
able to expect that an expansion of the present effort would provide the
equipment necessary for a coastal monitoring program.
The information on the EPA facilities does not have a breakdown of per-
sonnel by professional categories; only the totals of personnel were shown.
The format used in the appendix will allow professional categories and
numbers of people to be added to the working file at a later date as avail-
able. This information is presented in the same order as the other facili-
ties, by EPA regional divisions, and is further subdivided to the state and
county within the regions.
2-51
-------
Problem Areas
In establishing this inventory at least two problems began to become evident
as greater numbers of entries were made. The "Annual Budgets" category
was a significant area where information was not readily available. Very
few of the publications available provided budgetary estimates and, even
when reported, it most likely was not for the last fiscal year. All infor-
mation available has been presented — possibly indicating that a very de-
tailed personal contact approach is necessary if significantly improved
results are to be expected.
The second significant problem was obtaining complete information on the
breakdown of personnel. Most literature does not provide a breakdown of
personnel by technical classification. Another problem area was that many
agencies, especially at the federal and state levels, maintain programs
that were not always concerned with coastal water quality work or even
coastal monitoring or coastal facilities.
2. 13 LEGISLATION INVENTORY
Legislation enacted by 30 coastal states to provide water quality control
and/or the establishment of a specific water quality monitoring system
was reviewed and inventoried. The matrix in appendix N is an inventory,
by state, of pertinent legislation and a description thereof; the enforce-
ment agency charged to maintain surveillance over and control of the water
quality of each state, and the jurisdiction of that agency is shown. The
matrix represents a broad but thorough analysis of current legislation and
related matters. In addition, comments on existing monitoring, standards
and guidelines are included.
No constraints were found that can be termed a retardant to the establish-
ment of a National Water Quality Monitoring system other than that of
jurisdictional boundaries such as a Federal agent entering upon State,
Municipal, or private property without first securing permission either
from the owner or through the courts. The public interest in usable and
2-52
-------
acceptable water is so great that there is very little doubt that the courts
will grant reasonable access for monitoring purposes.
The comparison points out that state and industrial monitoring projects are
developing at an accelerated pace without uniform standards. In most
cases, one will find little similarity between state legislation and regula-
tions affecting water quality standards and controls. One major challenge
is the preparation of uniform legislation that is sufficiently flexible to per-
mit and receive local (state, county, municipal, and industrial) co-operation.
2-5^/2-54
-------
Section 3
COASTAL ZONE WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
3. 1 INVENTORY RESULTS
The inventory of coastal zone water quality monitoring activity presented in
Appendix I identified 2,844 stations active since 1970. These stations pro-
duced 3,104,926 measurements per year, with an average of nine para-
meters measured at each station. The station count in 1960 was 1,792,
a 59 percent increase over the decade. The inventory grouped parameters
as indicated in table 3-1, in which the number of parameters and the
corresponding percent of the total are shown.
TABLE 3-1. GENERAL PARAMETER GROUPS
Major
Parameter
Group
No. of
Parameters
Monitored
Percent
of
Total
Physical
10,455
40
Chemical
12,591
49
Biological
2,272
9
Sediment
641
2
The inventory also covered seven parameters of specific interest to the
coastal zone. Totals for these are shown in table 3-2.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-2. SPECIFIC PARAMETERS
Parameter
No. of
Parameters
Monitored
Percent
of
Total
Temperature
2,562
8
Conductivity
1,644
6
PH
2,636
10
Dissolved
Oxygen
1,896
8
Biological
Oxygen Demand
1,020
4
Turbidity
1,313
5
Coliforms
1,362
5
It should be pointed out that the number of measurements per year is
drastically affected by "continuous" monitoring stations which, for the
purposes of this study, were treated as one sample per hour or 8,760
measurements per year per parameter. Thus, of the 3,104, 926 measur-
ments/year shown above, more than 25 percent (797,160 measurements/
year) originated with only 46 active estuarine stations which monitor
"continuously".
3.1.1 Coastal Zone Water Quality Monitoring Estimate
The inventory results shown in table 3-2 represent identified monitoring
activity in the coastal zone. However, data from the case study areas
indicate more monitoring than is apparent in the inventory-
In order to estimate actual monitoring activity within the coastal zone, a
comparison was made between the original USGS survey data and that
same data augmented by input from the six case study areas. The results
of this comparison are summarized in table 3-3.
3-2
-------
TABLE 3-3. PERCENT DIFFERENCE AUGMENTED DATA IN
CASE STUDY AREAS VS ORIGINAL USGS SURVEY DATA
Case Study
No. of
No. of
Monitoring
Monitoring
Area
Agencies
Stations
Quantity (1)
Quality (2)
New York Bight
63%
81%
74%
14%
Charleston
200%
5, 600%
14, 935%
-68%
Biscayne Bay
600%
610%
30,600%
-41%
Pensacola Bay
325%
3,700%
14%
-17%
San Francisco Bay
70%
214%
12%
-16%
Oregon - Wash ington
40%
129%
5%
-11%
Coast
Average
216%
1,722%
7,607%
-23%
(1) Total measurements per year
(2) Defined as average number of parameters/station
Thus, on the average, one might assume that there are about twice as
many agencies monitoring in the coastal zone as shown in the original
OWDC data with 17 times as many stations! These numbers also suggest
that there are about 76 times as many samples taken per year, but the
average number of parameters per station declined about 23 percent.
Based on these assumptions, one could make an estimate of the total
national coastal water quality monitoring activity. However, due to the
wide variation in composition of the several case study areas, it cannot
be assumed that the average data values for the number of stations and
number of measurements per year shown are generally applicable to the
remainder of the U. S. Coastal zone. Thus, in order to extrapolate the
information derived in the case study areas to the remainder of the
coastal zone an arbitrary "area type" classification was made, as follows:
3-3
-------
Area
Type
Description
A Areas similar to the New York and San Francisco Bay
case study areas; i.e. , large metropolitan areas
surrounding an estuary fed by relatively large river
systems.
B Areas similar to the Charleston, Biscayne and Pensacola
case study areas; i.e. , medium-size metropolitan
areas with more "lagoon" type estuaries fed by smaller
river systems.
C Areas similar to the Oregon-Washington Coast case
study area; i.e. , relatively open coast with smaller
populations and estuarine systems.
Weighting factors for each type are developed as ratios for the number of
water quality monitoring stations and the number of measurements per
year based on the numbers available with and without the added case study
information, as indicated in table 3-4.
TABLE 3-4. STATION MEASUREMENT RATIOS WITH
AND WITHOUT CASE STUDIES
Total
Number of Stations
Total
Measurements/Yr
Area
Type
Area
w/case
Study
Data
w/o case
Study
Data
Ratio
w/case
Study
Data
w/o
Study
Data
Ratio
A
N. Y./SFO
359
157
2.29
264,109
281,000
0.94
B
Charleston/
Biscayne/
Pensacola
706
49
14.41
258,535
79,733
3.24
C
Wash-Oregon
135
59
2.29
237,747
226,147
1.05
3-4
-------
Table 3-5 lists the assignment of Area Type to the 325 coastal counties.
The table shows that 58 counties were assigned type "A" (18 percent of the
coastal zone), 26 counties are termed type "B" (8 percent), and the
remaining 241 (74 percent) "C" type. Tables 3-6 and 3-7 show the appli-
cation of weighting factors to these segments of the coastal zone providing
a conservative estimate of actual monitoring activity. Based on the
increases found in each case study area, as applied to the remainder of
the coastal zone, the calculations suggest that there are some 6,832 active
monitoring stations which produce approximately 3,461,286 measurements
per year.
Based on data presented in other sections of this report, some interesting
statistics can be developed on a national average basis, presented in table
These counties are classified "A" (Similar to San Francisco-New York)
3-8.
TABLE 3-5. COASTAL COUNTY CLASSIFICATION
State
County
State
County
Alabama
Baldwin
Mobile
Alameda
Contra Costa
Los Angeles
Marin
Napa
San Diego
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santa Clara
Solano
Sonoma
Delaware
Kent
New Castle
Cook
Lake
Jefferson
Orleans
Plaqueine
St. Bernard
Baltimore
Calvert
Cecil
Charles
Hartford
California
Illinois
Indiana
Louisiana
Maryland
3-5
-------
Table 3-5. Coastal County Classification (Continued)
State
County
State
County
Maryland
Prince Georges
New York (Con't)
Queens
(Con't)
St. Marys
Richmond
Massachusetts
Norfolk
Westchester
Michigan
Macome
Texas
Chambers
Wayne
Galveston
New Jersey
Bergen
Harris
Cumberland
San Patricio
Gloucester
Virginia
Arlington
Hudson
Fairfax
Middlesex
King George
Monmouth
Prince William
Salem
York
New York
Bronx
Washington
King
Kings
Kitsap
New York
Pierce
Snohomish
Wisconsin
Milwaukee
These counties are classified "B" (
Similar to Charleston-Pensacola-Biscaync
Florida
Dade
Rhode Island
Bristol
Escambia
Kent
Hillsborough
Newport
Manatee
Providence
Pinellas
South Carolina
Charleston
Santa Rosa
Texas
Aransas
Georgia
Chatham
Braxoria
Ohio
Lucas
Calhoun
3-6
-------
Table 3-5. Coastal County Classification (Continued)
State
County
State
County
Texas (Cont)
Cameron
Texas (Cont)
Matagorda
Jackson
Nueces
Jefferson
Orange
Kenedy
Refugio
Kleberg
Willacy
Note: All remaining counties are classified "CM (Similar to Oregon-
Washington)
TABLE 3-6. ADJUSTMENT TO NUMBER OF STATIONS
Type
Area
Weighting
Factor
(1)
Orig. No.
Stations
Estimated
No. Stations
A
2.29
581
1,330
B
14.41
199
2,868
C
2.29
1,150
2,634
1,930
6,832
Net increase of 4, 902 stations or 3. 54 to 1.
(1) Adjusted to reflect data prior to case study input.
TABLE 3-7. ADJUSTMENT TO MEASUREMENTS PER YEAR
Type
Area
Weighting
Factor
(1)
Original
Meas/Yr
Estimated
Meas/yr
A
.94
859,486
807,917
B
3.24
219,588
711,465
C
1.05
1,849,432
1,941,904
2,928,506
3,461,286
Net increase of 532,780 measurements/yr or 1.18 to 1
(1) Adjusted to reflect data prior to case study input.
3-7
-------
TABLE 3-8. NATIONAL COASTAL ZONE AVERAGES
Per MGD
Total
Waste
Discharge
Per
100,000
Persons
Per mile
of tidal
Coastline
Per
mile of
general
Coastline
Per
Water
Quality
Laboratory
No. Stations
.28
8. 3
. 12
.73
24
No. Measure-
ments/yr
141
4,215
59
367
11,977
Some of the numbers shown in table 3-8 have been validated by a survey
of Outfall Monitoring Programs (Para. 3.1.2), where 15 thermal, munici-
pal and industrial outfalls from four areas were analyzed in detail to
determine the extent of monitoring activities. The results indicate an
average of about 150 measurements per year for each MGD of effluent
flow, which compares favorably with the 141 measurements per MGD per
year (table 3-8).
3.1.2 Outfall Monitoring Program Survey
In developing a national coastal water quality monitoring program, the volume
of data to be handled must be estimated to determine data management
requirements.
Most states require only outfall operators to monitor the effluent volume
and characteristics but do not require detailed monitoring of the receiving
waters in a systematic program. Thus, the environmental effect of the
effluent is not fully known under varying natural conditions. However, the
long-term monitoring plan must allow for future expansion of additional
surveillance as states require receiving water self-monitoring by the
outfall operators.
In order to estimate the amount of data arising from self monitoring
programs a survey was made of monitoring programs associated with
15 specific outfalls of the following types: thermal, sewage and industrial.
3-8
-------
The survey consisted of listing outfalls by type of effluent, flow rate, type
and depth of receiving waters, number of sampling stations, number of
measured parameters and frequency of measurements. The last three
items were combined to obtain the total number of measurements per year
for each outfall. Table 3-9 tabulates the results of the data.
The results suggest that both sewage and industrial dischargers make
approximately 150 analytical measurements per year for each million
gallons per day (MGD) of effluent flow. Because of the large flow rates
and lower amounts of potential contaminants, most thermal waste dis-
chargers only make about 10 measurements per year per MGD. Each
measurement requires an average of 20 characters to define the parameter
name, value, date and time of measurement of sampling. Thus, there
will be an estimated annual computer data storage requirement of 3,000
characters per MGD for sewage and industrial outfall monitoring and 200
characters per MGD for thermal outfall monitoring.
Extrapolating these factors on a nation-wide basis, the 2,624 inventoried
coastal sewage and industrial plants with a total flow of 24, 385 MGD, and
the 240 inventoried power plants with a total flow of 74, 843 MGD will have
data outputs of 73 million and 15 million characters, respectively, for a
total of 90 million characters per year if all outfall receiving waters are
monitored to the extent indicated in this survey.
3. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON MONITORING
The coastline of the United States is influenced to varying degrees by the
following environmental factors: climate, tides, coastal configuration,
rivers, currents, geology and the physical aspects of the continental
margin. In general, all are important and must be considered to have an
effect on water quality monitoring. There are, however, coastal areas
3-9
-------
TABLE 3-9. OUTFALL MONITORING PROGRAM SURVEY
Effluent
Receiving
Flow
No.
No.
Measur.
Measur/Year
Avg. Meas/Year
State
County
Type
Water Type
MGD
Stat.
Param.
Per Year
Per MGD Flow
Per Avg. Flow
Fla
Dade
Therm
Semiclsd Bay
2,747.0
62
23
23,896
8.69
Ca
Los Angeles
Therm
Open Ocean
580.0
94
22
2,808
4.84
Ca
San Diego
Therm
Open Ocean
504.0
45
32
4,836
9.59
Thermal Discharge Averages:
1,277.0
67
25
10,513
7.70
8.20
Ca
Los Angeles
Sew I
Open Ocean
380. 0
70
20
30,817
81.09
Ca
Los Angeles
Sew I
Open Ocean
350.0
85
21
84,212
240.60
Ca
Orange
Sew I
Open Ocean
135.0
30
18
9,760
72.29
Fla
Dade
Sew II
Open Ocean
47.5
9
6
5,615
119.46
S C
Charleston
Sew I
Clsd Estuary
15.0
3
5
936
62.40
Fla
Escambia
Sew II
Clsd Bay
6.5
5
6
180
27.69
Fla
Escambia
Sew I
Clsd Bay
0.6
5
6
180
300.0
Ca
Marin
Sew II
Semiclsd Bay
0.2
9
8
894
4,063.63
Sewage Discharge Averages:
117.0
27
11
16,574
620.89
141.65
Fla
Escambia
Indust
Clsd Estuary
52. 5
4
14
2,704
51.50
S C
Charleston
Indust
Clsd Estuary
40.0
12
14
5,676
141.90
Fla
Escambia
Indust
Crk Clsd Est
27.0
30
11
10,381
384.48
Ca
Contra Costa
Indust
Semiclsd Est
1.0
6
7
314
314.00
Indust Discharge Averages
30.1
13
11
4,768
222.97
158.40
-------
along which certain distinct environmental factors are dominant. Certain
of these critical factors are briefly covered below.
Probably the most significant environmental modifier of a monitoring
scheme is climate. For example, ice cover for significant parts of the
year can restrict monitoring severely. Receiving water temperature can
make heated effluents deleterious to the local fauna and flora. It follows
that it is more important to monitor temperature in warm waters, such
as Florida or Hawaii, than in cold Alaska waters, because a slight
increase in sea water temperature as a result of coolant discharge water
in the summer may be lethal to various warm water species; whereas the
same temperature increase may have negligible deleterious effects on
species in cold Alaskan waters. The prevailing winds are important to
consider as they tend to set up persistent surface circulation patterns,
such as the trade winds of the tropics. Atmospheric washout and fallout
are also affected by the winds. Rainfall will affect streamflow as well as
the concentrations of chemical constituents in coastal waters. Storm
patterns are of importance in the planning for frequency of monitoring and
the type and size of vessel necessary to operate for a specific percent of
the year. Storm conditions have significant impact on remote insitu sensor
systems design; they also have an undetermined impact on the natural
environment through effects of increased runoff, and possible deleterious
effect on the marine biota.
Tidal dynamics for different geographic areas are important in regulating
tidal flushing in each area and also the observational frequency required
for water quality monitoring. As an example, the tide type and ranges
vary tremendously from semidiurnal and 35 feet at Anchorage Alaska, to
diurnal and less than 1 foot in Western Gulf Coast. These differences in
tidal conditions would require different monitoring considerations for
pollutants such as sampling frequency, area extent and depth.
3-11
-------
Coastline configuration is an important consideration in a monitoring plan
as it may be the controlling factor in physical environment. Also, monitor-
ing requirements differ, by necessity, between areas (e.g. , a broad coastal
plain, such as the Middle Atlantic Seaboard, and rugged coastlines, such
as Maine and Northern California). In addition to affecting the physical
environment, the coastal configuration secondarily governs land use
patterns, waste disposal requirements and amount and variety of prevalent
vegetation.
Water quality monitoring plans must adapt to variable levels of river
discharge as well as the chemical characteristics of the river. Rivers
draining predominantly agricultural areas carry different pollutants to the
coastal zone than do those draining a major metropolitan area. The rivers
of the Pacific Northwest flow continuously, whereas those of Southern
California flow only during significant storms. River flow and pollutant
load must be monitored at a regular frequency in one area, and monitored
in an irregular, more detailed manner in another. Oceanic and coastal
circulation patterns must be considered when developing a moni-
toring plan. Currents are also a significant factor. The closer
to shore or more confined the area, the more significant currents
become. Offshore they may be slight and predictable; near shore, they
may fluctuate irregularly in speed and direction and be affected by wind
and waves; tidal currents are important in inlets, channels and bays,
and estuarine circulation is important because of the mixing pattern and
changes due to fluctuations in fresh water flow or tide height.
Suspended sediments in the water are a major contribution to water color
and turbidity. Naturally, this is a more critical consideration where major
sediment-carrying streams reach the ocean; however, in some areas erosion
of the coastline contributes to the water turbidity. Accretion of the
shoreline can lead to changes in the shoreline configuration, changes
in inlet locations and changes in circulation patterns. It is important to
consider the sediment discharge in a high-rainfall area versus a
3-12
-------
low-rainfall or non-drainage area; as the amount of discharged, suspended
sediment increases, the water becomes more discolored, light penetration
is reduced, and increased sedimentation occurs where currents are weak.
These effects must be monitored because when left unchecked, increased
discharge of sediments will reduce plant growth, bury benthic plants and
animals, restrict navigation and mask other pollutants.
The physical configuration of the continental margin affects the design of
a monitoring system in several interrelated ways. The broader the shelf,
the greater the need to monitor water quality to detect any on-shore
movement of previously deposited waste material. The presence of
submarine canyons, broad plateaus and other topographic features of the
margin affect wave patterns and energy reaching the shore; this, in turn,
will greatly influence the locations of sampling stations as well as the
frequency of observation.
3. 3 LABORATORY SAMPLE ANALYSIS COSTS
During this analysis numerous public and private laboratories were con-
tacted. These contacts, together with the extensive case study interviews,
provided the basic data against which operational cost perspectives could
be developed.
In addition to obtaining operational cost information from the various
laboratories, the users or buyers of these services were contacted to
provide a measure of actual contract prices for various service levels.
The technical aspects of the water quality analysis field are complex and
varied. Accordingly, certain assumptions were required in order to limit
the study of a manageable task. The more important assumptions were:
(1) The initial capital investment should be the minimum consistent
with performing the common analytical services and maintaing
a competitive technical posture.
3-13
-------
(2) The highest degree of automation will be incorporated into any
equipment selection.
(3) There will be a sufficient demand for services to permit some
degree of optimization in scheduling and workflow, thus minimizing
equipment setup.
This study did not include a technical analysis of the various laboratory
procedures necessary to perform the myriad potential water quality
determinations. No evaluations were made, either scientific or economic,
of available laboratory equipment performance levels, other than to
determine those items most commonly in use. Since there are often
technical procedures utilizing different equipment for determining the same
parameters, we attempted only to establish the order of magnitude required
for initial equipment expenditures and total capital investment.
The study is meant to be a general feasibility study for a commercial
water quality laboratory. Testing and equipment requirements are
sophisticated. As a result, specific cost/profitability figures will vary
by the types of customers served, which will determine the specific mix of
tests performed.
There are over 150 different determinations—individual analyses of a
particular parameter—which may be performed in a typical water quality
analysis lab. Most of these determinations can be made using various
alternate techniques. The degree of automation will vary according to
the specific technique and the equipment utilized. The trend in the industry
is strongly towards greater automation.
The frequency at which certain determinations are made will vary according
to the specific requirements for each station being monitored. In other
words, not all tests will be performed on every sample taken from the same
3-14
-------
station. The testing pattern may require a different set of determinations
weekly, biweekly, monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or on a one-time
only basis.
Although the Refuse Act of 1899 required data on eleven standard waste
parameters to be provided to the Army Corps of Engineers for waste
discharges into navigable waters, additional requirements are added for
various industries according to their standard industrial classifications.
As a result of this and other factors, there has been a trend toward a
development of "standard" chemical analyses packages within the industry.
These "standard" packages are reflected in the pricing policies of many
of the laboratories surveyed. Not only does every individual determination
have its own unit price, but the various "standard" analyses are also priced
on a unit basis.
The variations in pricing among the companies sampled are significant.
Although local wage levels may have some influence on the variations, by
far the more significant factor is the degree of management sophistication
which the various labs seem to demonstrate. The organization of workflow,
degree of automation, and knowledge of cost/volume relationships appear
to be the key elements in determining the competitiveness of the resulting
price structure. Of these, an understanding of cost/volume relationships
are most important in setting price policy and forecasting profitability.
The data collected from a diversity of sources during the field survey
could not be correlated in a manner that would provide a reliable sample
for statistical projections because of variations in the factors influencing
the composite cost/price equation (see table 3-10). Thus, an attempt was
made to work backwards in the equation, through breakeven analysis,
structuring the optimum mix of common cost/price factors to determine
the theoretical economics of a water quality program.
3-15
-------
CO
I
Ci
TABLE 3-10. LABORATORY COST ANALYSIS BY PARAMETER
in
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ViVti UJLiV
p/W/m:?.
BOD
5 20.
00
0.00
14.
00
4.
GO
7.
50
10.
00
23.
00
17.50
25.00
12.
50
5.
00
30.
OO
5.
00
20.00
10.00
13.50
14.
42
COD
15.
00
a.oo
14.
00
6.
90
7.
50
5.
90
12.
00
5.00
25.00
8.
on
5.
oc
25.
00
13.
00
5.
00
12.00
10.00
9.00
9.
32
UILDRIUL
3.
50
2.00
4.
00
3.
45
2-
00
2.
50
->
00
5.00
10.00
3.
00
3.
04
10.
00
5.
00
*>
50
3.00
2.00
1.50
4.
09
GIL a
40.
,00
30.
00
4.
CO
10.
00
a.
00
15.
00
20.00
4.00
16.
45
uitkkx
7,
.50
3.00
4.
,00
2*
,30
5.
,00
5.
,00
,on
7.50
15.00
3.
00
-¦4.
52
20.
00
G.
00
00
80.00
2.00
3.75
6.
26
^n-jirjc
12.
,50
3,00
5.
.00
4,
.GO
3.
.00
5.
.no
A.
.00
0.50
15.00
3.
,00
4.
,52
20.
,00
6.
00
5.
,00
4.00
3.20
3.00
6.
43
;ji4hi
12.
,50
3.00
4,
.50
4,
.60
6.
.00
5,
.00
3.
.00
3.50
15.00
3.
,00
7,
,0G
15.
,00
5.
,00
8.00
8.02
6.00
7.
,82
1X12
5,
,00
3.00
4.
.00
3,
.45
->
.00
1.
.00
4,
.00
2.00
5.00
5.
.04
3.
,00
4.00
8.00
3.00
3.
,75
£*
3.
.50
1.00
3,
.00
1
.65
1
.00
1
.00
*>
.00
2.00
5.00
1.
.00
4,
.08
1.
.00
1,
.50
2.50
.80
1.50
2,
,16
3,
.50
2.00
5.
.50
.30
2
.00
2
.50
->
.00
3.50
10.00
2
.00
3,
.12
10,
.00
3,
.00
4.00
2.30
1.50
3,
.73
Hg
14.
,00
5.00
3,
.00
13
.80
15.
.00
10
.00
1C
.00
20.00
25.00
15.
.00
25.
.53
50,
.00
3,
,00
15,
,00
20.00
12.00
15.00
13,
.02
P
15.
.00
4.00
7,
.50
6
.90
3.
.00
7
.50
R
.00
7.50
10.00
5,
.00
3,
.54
20,
.00
6.
,00
3,
,00
8.00
3.20
6.75
7,
.36
Si
1J
.00
3.00
7,
.50
T
.30
3
.00
->
.50
4
.00
10.00
15.00
3,
.00
4.
,03
20,
.00
6,
.00
5,
.00
16.00
2.40
3.75
7,
.35
'i'US
j
.00
4.00
3
.00
O
.30
3
.00
5
.00
4
.00
3.00
7.50
3
.00
6
.33
10
.00
5.
.00
3
.00
12.00
2.40
3.75
5
.25
'iVS
5
.00
4.00
•!
.00
.30
2
.00
2
.50
4
.00
10.00
7.50
3
.00
6
.33
10
.00
4
.00
3
.00
4.00
6.40
2.25
4
.73
re*;
5
.00
4.00
4
.00
1
.30
2
.00
5
.00
4
.00
6.50
7.50
5
.00
6
.38
10
.00
5
.00
3
.00
12.00
4.00
3.75
6
.26
'xiiiiur^Y
.50
1.00
3,
,50
1
.05
3
.00
1
.00
2
.00
3.00
5.00
3
.00
3
.53
10
.00
4
.00
2
.50
4.00
2.40
2.25
3
.31
OULIFDUl
20.
.00
4.00
C,
.00
4
.CO
3
.00
10
.00
U
.00
15.00
15.00
25
.on
10
.63
15
.00
7
.50
12.00
10.00
7.50
9
.58
nraw
40.
.00
d.00
u.
.00
4
.60
j
.00
15
.00
4
.00
7
.50
6.00
10
.90
ZOU
40,
.00
U.OO
3,
.00
4
.CO
5
.00
15
.00
4
.00
7
.50
6.00
10
.90
AVn TOTAL COST
'iUrAL OOGT/ 5204.50 SO.00 171.50 33.00 30.00 120.50 132.00 149.50 217.50 97.50 107.96 2GC.00 Gn.00 107.00 178.50 106.40 07.75 156.56
LfJJOItfmJKT
AW PAWVLVirU 4.23
OJCTl'/LAD
4.21
ii.yS 4.ID 4.21
ii. 00 C .CO
J.79 12.79 6.09
G.35 16.63 G.18
MS PARAf-ElEP COST
5.35 9.92 5.32 5.1C 7.82
-------
One approach to this resolution of data is through the format of a profit/
volume relationship or breakeven analysis. To perform this analysis, we
obtained fixed-and variable-cost data from several manufacturers of
laboratory equipment. This information, coupled with the field survey
data and operating ratios, enable one to project the economics at various
program levels.
There are many variables and cost factors which must be taken into
consideration in determining the economics of water quality analysis.
The first consideration is the three stages in the integrated process.
Each stage has numerous factors or combinations of factors which will
influence the cost/price equation:
Stage No. 1 - Obtaining Samples
(1) Number of samples taken (volume).
(2) Frequency of sampling (load factor).
(3) Representative area to be covered in sampling:
- Linear coastline.
- Distance offshore.
(4) Water depths of samples:
- Underway samples.
- Dead-in-the-water samples.
(5) Seasonal variations (ice, etc.).
(6) Sea-state conditions.
(7) Packaging and delivery cost.
(8) Regional cost differences (wages, taxes, etc.).
Stage No. 2 - Laboratory Analysis
(1) Number of determinations (parameters).
(2) Number of samples analyzed (volume).
(3) Frequency of analysis (load factor).
3-17
-------
(4) Preparation of samples (setup time).
(5) Expendables required in analyses.
(6) Degree of automation in analysis.
(7) Level of competence (personnel).
(8) Regional cost differences (wages, taxes, etc.).
Stage No. 3 - Compilation and Transmission of Data
(1) Number of samples or determinations (volume).
(2) Frequency of compilation (load factor).
(3) Format (written or data processing).
(4) Transmission of data.
(5) Regional cost differences (wages, taxes, etc.).
It is difficult to extract the associated costs of obtaining the samples and
transmitting the data from the contract prices for integrated services
provided by the end users who were contacted as an information source
during the field survey.
Reference (16) was one source used for definitive costs in Stages 1 and 3
of processing water quality data.
The cost/price structure of the entire integrated process is probably
more sensitive to variations in the cost of obtaining samples than to
the cost fluctuations in the production Stages, 2 and 3. The compilation
and transmission of data is possibly the least cost sensitive in the inte-
grated process.
It must be recognized that economic analysis can be extremely responsive
to variations in cost/price/volume relationships. This can be particularly
true where there is an elasticity of demand in competitive situations. One
of the problems identified during our field survey was the indeterminant
cost structure related to volume. This is partially due to a lack of
3-18
-------
operating experience at increasing demand levels rising from recent
legislative and regulatory requirements. It is clear, however, that quoted
prices do not now influence the elasticity of demand. In other words, more
end users are not brought into the market for these services by virtue of
price reductions. Demand has been artifically expanded by existing or pending
legislation or the enforcement and liabilities associated with specific
performance.
The key variables in Stage 2, Laboratory Analysis, are primarily related
to volume projections. The costs incurred and the degree of automation
required will be determined by the number of samples processed, multi-
plied by some factor which recognizes the number of determinations or
parameters to be analyzed. The rate at which these samples enter the
analytical process will determine the load factor with reciprocal costs in
stand-by time, equipment depreciation, overtime or accelerated mainte-
nance, etc. The mix of determinations, together with frequency, will
cause fluctuations in setup costs. For example, slight variances in the
type of analysis and frequency can be noted within programs supported by
EPA. Magnifying these variances with input from other monitoring
stations in the same time sequences can amplify load factors and increase
production costs, where an even work flow would have a leveling effect
on output and cost factors in an automated system.
Automation in laboratory analysis can effect cost reductions where there
is a continuity of work flow. This was demonstrated in two recent cost
evaluations conducted in separate facilities and in several of the price
listings discovered during the field survey. We have included these two
evaluations, by way of illustrating incremental cost variations which are
volume related, in Appendix M.
The USGS laboratory in Salt Lake City has done considerable work in
the automation of water quality analysis and its impact on manpower,
money and equipment. Although some data is available on the results
3-19
-------
of this pilot study, the total report has not been released. The USGS
approach is to weigh each separate determination relative to a "standard
analysis" of 1.00 which is, in turn, priced at a "standard" amount. For
example, if a "standard analysis" is billed at $29.00 then a particular
determination with a factor of . 10 is worth $2. 90.
Two price lists, one for automated and the other for non-automated
chemical analysis were supplied by the USGS Central Laboratory at Salt
Lake City, Utah, and show a factor for cost differentiation. (Tables 3-11
and 3-12.) The significance of these price lists is found in the cost factor
multiplier. In the automated list, a factor of 1. 00 is used in computing
total package costs of $29. 00.
The non-automated analysis uses a cost factor of 1. 5 for the cost
differential between manual and automatic processes. In other words,
manual operations are computed at one and one-half times the basic
cost incurred. Using this factor as a universal measure of cost differential
is deceptive because it presumes an equal or level load factor. One must
remember automation, as a cost reduction program, is dependent upon volume
at a consistent level of production. However, automation as a quality
control program may have a substantial effect on performance.
The survey provided a wide spectrum of cost data. These variances were
primarily caused by:
(1) A general lack of cost information or systems and procedures
which would produce accurate figures.
(2) Water quality analysis laboratories which were part of a larger
complex, or were not treated as individual cost centers.
(3) Water quality analysis included as part of a larger program and
funded on an annual basis, without regard to volume produced.
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-11. NON-AUTOMATED CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Factor x 29.00 x 1.5 = Parameter Analytical Cost
Parameter Code
Parameter
Factor*
Cost
00080
Color
0.02
0. 87
00340
Chemical Oxygen Demand
. 15
6.52
(COD)
71820
Density
.10
4. 35
00550
Oil and Grease
.12
5.22
00515
Residue and Evaporation
. 10
4.35
00530
Suspended Solids
.08
3.48
00070
Turbidity
.02
0.87
71825
Acidity
.08
3.48
01106
Aluminum
. 12
5.22
71845
Ammonium
. 10
4.35
01000
Arsenic
.20
8.70
01005
Barium
.10
4. 35
01010
Beryllium
. 10
4.35
01020
Boron
.10
4.35
71870
Bromide
. 20
8.70
01025
Cadmium
.15
6.52
00445
Carbonate
.06
2.61
01035
Cobalt
.15
6.52
01040
Copper
. 15
6.52
01032
Chromium (Cr+^)
. 15
7.83
00720
Cyanide
.25
10.87
71865
Iodide
.20
8.70
01049
Lead
. 15
6.52
01130
Lithium
CO
O
3.48
71890
Mercury Di$s.
.15
6.52
3-21
-------
Table 3-11. Non-Automated Chemical Analysis (Continued)
Parameter Code
Parameter
Factor*
Cost
71900
Mercury Total
. 15
6. 52
01060
Molybdenum
. 25
10. 87
01065
Nickel
.15
6.52
71855
Nitrite
.06
2. 61
00605
Nitrogen, Organic
.15
6. 52
32730
Phenol
. 15
6. 52
00650
Phosphate (total)
. 11
4.78
01145
Selenium
.23
10. 87
01075
Silver
.15
6. 52
01080
Strontium
.08
3. 48
01085
Vanadium
.20
8.70
01090
Zinc
.08
3. 48
38260
MBAS
.10
4.35
^Optimum load or package factor
TABLE 3-12. CENTRAL LABORATORY WRD
Salt Lake City, Utah
Fractional Factors for Computing Costs of Chemical Analysis
Automated Standard Chemical Analysis
Factor x 29. 00 = parameter analytical cost
Parameter Code
Parameter
Factor
Cost
00955
Silica
0.06
1.74
01046
Iron
.06
1. 74
01056
Manganese
.06
1.74
00915
Calcium
.08
2.32
00925
Magnesium
.08
2. 32
3-22
-------
Table 3-12. Central Laboratory WRD, Salt Lake City, Utah (Continued)
Parameter Code
Parameter
Factor
Cost
00930
Sodium
.06
1.74
00935
Potassium
.06
1.74
00440
Bicarbonate
.06
1.74
00945
Sulfate
. 10
2. 90
00940
Chloride
.06
1.74
00950
Fluoride
. 09
2. 61
71850
Nitrate
.07
2. 03
00660
Phosphate (ortho)
.06
1.74
00095
Specific Conductance
.05
1. 45
00400
pH
.05
1.45
1.00
$29.00
(4) Unit costs that included integrated processes (sampling, analysis,
and transmission).
(5) Unit costs based upon contract costs for predetermined volume
and frequency.
(6) Unit costs that incorporate various parameters of mixes of
determinations.
By far the most troublesome source of cost differentiation was the package
costing of various parameters or determinations. In general, there were
three groupings of analysis, which can be described as (1) Basic, (2)
Minerals or Metals, and (3) Pesticides. Each grouping may include
several parameters not included in other "packages". In such cases it is
not possible merely to add or subtract parameters to get a consistency
in packages and related costs or pricing.
3-23
-------
A number of price lists were obtained as a result of our survey which
contained representatives costs per sample (table 3-10).
These lists were useful in determining the array of cost/prices, but did
not provide all the data necessary to project the anticipated costs associated
with a consistent or "optimum" level of operations, nor are they sufficient
in themselves. If it were possible merely to obtain several price lists
and strike an average, our assignment would have been simplified.
In order to determine ths "optimum" level of operations, it is essential
to specify the following:
(1) The number of parameters or determinations.
(2) The combination of parameters that can be analyzed as a "package"
in the same format of operation or through the same analytical
equipment ("batch process").
(3) The "mix of these combinations or "packages" in the analytical
process.
(4) The frequency or load factor with which these "packages" are
processed through the system.
These specifications will provide a standard production unit with a standard
unit cost. Our analysis presumed a standard package or combination of
determinations at between 10-15 parameters, with an average price of
$35. 00 per production unit. This is still far from an "optimum" cost
figure to be used in projections.
3-24
-------
Optimum cost figures must presume a level of operating efficiency, based
on performance curves and operating experience. We presumed an
operating efficiency related to a single production shift-equipment capacity,
at three performance levels in order to perform our analysis.
COST FACTORS
The following cost factors are discussed:
• Facilities
• Manpower
• Equipment
Based on these factors, an overall cost model will be developed.
An examination of the data applicable to over 25 labs across the country
performing water quality analyses indicates that the typical lab is quite
small, usually under 5,000 square feet. Table 3-13 shows the percent
distribution of the sample according to size.
TABLE 3-13. PERCENT DISTRIBUTION BY SQUARE FOOTAGE
Square Feet
%
0 -
2,500
25.0
2,501 -
- 5,000
35.7
5,001 ¦
7,500
14.3
7,501 -
¦ 10,000
7.2
over
10,000
17.8
3-25
-------
There are, of course, several large labs occupying in excess of 100,000
square feet but, as would be expected, these labs offer a wide range of
testing capabilities extending into many areas other than water quality.
The data makes it clear, though, that the specialized water quality lab
may be as small as 1,500 - 2,000 square feet, with more than 60 percent
being 5,000 feet or less.
In keeping with our findings relative to the size of the typical lab, the
number of employees is also quite small. The majority of labs surveyed
have fewer than 10 employees, with only approximately 15 percent having
more than 20 on their staff.
The number of square feet of facility per employee for these labs is under
1, 000 square feet (figure 3-1). Although the results showed a greater
variation than prior analysis, the results still were fairly consistent across
the sample. The results ranged from 200 to 600 square feet per person,
with a mean value of 400 square feet per employee.
The selection of proper equipment is the most significant factor in the
cost equations, since it not only affects the investment required but also is
the major influence on the rate for processing work through the lab.
Several recent studies, indicate that the time per determination for
automated analysis is reduced by 50 percent to 75 percent from the manual
times. For example, the combined average time for seven different
kinds of determinations was reduced from . 13 to . 02 hours per set—
a decrease of over 80 percent.
There is a great variety of equipment which is required in the modern
lab. In fact, the list is almost infinite. However, our analysis indicates
that $10,000 - $12,000 per employee is a reasonable estimate of equipment
requirements for a modest water quality lab. Predictably, the investment
per employee tends to increase as the number of employees decreases.
Table 3-14 is a typical equipment list with estimated prices.
3-26
-------
10
**-\
, u •-> 0
.%ooo
6,000
ui
7,CsCC
i~
o 6ooo
o
Z' 5-°°
(1
4,0CC
D
CO
3^00
£6*00
1,000
s
£4-6 3 10 12 14- >6 \b LC 22. Z4 2i> ZS 30 32
KJUK.1BER. CP tUPLOVI'i- r..
Figure 3-1. Square Footage vs Employees
-------
TABLE 3-14. LABORATORY EQUIPMENT
Item
Manufacturer
Approx. Price
Autoanalyzer (6 channel)
Technicon
$30,000
Infrared Analyzer
Beckman
4,200
Atomic Absorption
Beckman
7,500
GSA Chromatograph
Varian
5,800
Other Lab Equipment
various
15,000
Furniture and Fixtures
various
7, 500
Lab Supplies and Miscellaneous
various
5,000
Total
75,000
Duplicate Items and Contingency
various
25,000
Total Requirement
$100,000
Table 3-15 summarizes the various factors discussed previously, showing
relationships at three different ranges of activity. The analysis indicates
that a lab equipped as above will process an average of from 700 to 1, 000
samples per year, with each sample consisting of approximately 10 - 15
determinations utilizing several different techniques within the lab.
TABLE 3-15. RELATIONSHIPS BY RANGE
Range
Employees
Square Feet
Equipment
Samples
A
3 - 8
3,000
$ 75,000
4,000
B
9-15
5,000
100,000
8,000
C
16 - 25
10,000
200,000
14,000
The fixed/variable costs relationships are shown in table 3-16. These
costs assume a 15 percent annual depreciation rate and leasehold costs at
$4. 00/square foot annually. We have also estimated the fixed management
portion of the total payroll.
3-28
-------
TABLE 3-16. FIXED/VARIABLE COSTS BY RANGE
Range
Fixed
Variable
Total
Per Sample
A
45,000
75,000
120,000
$30. 00
B
70,000
150,000
220,000
27.50
C
120,000
250,000
370,000
26. 40
These costs have been plotted on figure 3-2. Although the numbers will
be influenced by equipment and facility decisions, and also local price
variations in wages and expenses, the basic relationships as shown will
be generally valid. This cost model is a useful tool in the decision
making and planning process, as will be shown later in this report.
One of the most important findings in this study relates to the wide
variation in prices among the labs sampled. Ten determinations were
selected (turbidity, total solids, COD , ph, nitrate, nitrite, chloride,
mercury, silica and phosphate) as a service package which included
automated, instrumented and manual analytical techniques, and com-
pared the prices for this package as obtained during the field survey. The
total price charged for the ten determinations varied from a low of
approximately $30 to a high of approximately $130. The median price
was $50; and the average for all laboratories amounted to approximately
$60.
A plot of the unit prices for the set of ten determinations against the square
footage of most of the laboratories surveyed is shown in figure 3-3. The
results indicate a trend toward higher price schedules for the larger
facilities.
Several conclusions can be drawn from the price structure analysis.
3-29
-------
CO
I
CO
o
4-00 ..
300 .
VARIABLE COSTS
ZOO.
100
FIXED COSTS
4
I 4-
2
a
o
SAMPLES im thousands
Figure 3-2. Cost Model (Variable and Fixed Costs)
-------
if
0
(/>'
«j 7
Cj ^
j- u
«
r
i—
^ 3
d
£/3
4-0
c
60
2£
/DO
no
CE. W JOE •' iM C'CLL-- R
Figure 3-3. Selling Prices vs Size
-------
(1) The demand for water quality analytical services is inelastic in
the economic sense; price levels do not affect volume. If this
were not true, then the larger labs would evidence lower prices in
order to attract greater volumes since, as will be shown later,
they have the higher breakeven point.
One factor not evaluated was wider range of ancillary services
performed by the larger labs, which increases their attractiveness
in the market place. However, the basic conclusion is still valid;
i. e. , that for -iny given lab, volume appears to be independent of
price and related primarily to the other factors which may include
the range of services performed, and the quality or timeliness
of performance.
(2) In addition to the basic unit charges for the various determinations
performed, it was noted that several labs incorporated other
factors into their billing. Some labs have a minimum order
charge. Others priced on minimum sample quantities. Some had
different price schedules for initial and subsequent determinations.
These wide variations in pricing policy indicated clearly that the
industry is unsophisticated in its approach to the market place,
and in its price structure.
(3) The USGS laboratory in Salt Lake City has done considerable work
in the automation of water quality analysis and its impact on
manpower, money and equipment. One can recognize that ten
determinations of the same parameter will have a different cost
impact than ten determinations for different parameters, even
though the combined total of factors are equal. One condition
might result in a balanced production flow, whereas the other
might create overtime in one area and idle time in another.
3-32
-------
(4) A key difficulty experienced was to identify the "standard" package
of determinations. Some labs have prices established for standard
packages but these packages, with minor exceptions, are not con-
sistent among the various labs surveyed. In general, most labs
offer a "shopping list" of services and ignore the interrelationship
of prices to different combinations of determinations.
(5) Another important factor affecting the price structure in the
industry is the local variation in water samples. One laboratory,
which averages about 60 samples per day on an annual basis,
actually experiences a daily range from a low of 6 per day to a
high of 130 per day. Since any price structure must be based on
some relevant range of activity, variations such as those cited
indicate that present price schedules, by and large, are nothing
more than educated guesses.
(6) The basic cost/volume/profit relationships within the industry in
general and the companies sampled in particular, are generally
ill-defined and are not truly reflected in the respective price
schedules.
Prof it/Volume Relationship
The purpose of the P/V analysis or "breakeven" chart is to show graphically
the relationship of profitability to volume. Total income and total costs
are equated at various levels of output. The cost line is not a smooth, linear
relationship through all levels of productions but rather moves in incre-
ments through a series of "relevant ranges" as shown in figure 3-2. Each
"relevant range" has its own unique P/V relationship based upon the
prevailing fixed/variable cost equation which in turn is usually the result
of trading off increased investment for reduced manpower at higher
volume levels.
3-33
-------
The cost model shown in figure 3-2, however, indicates that the slope of
the total cost line does not change significantly for the three ranges shown.
This indicates that there are no apparent economies of scale accruing to
larger more automated labs. In other words, an efficiently run small lab
will have approximately the same unit costs as a larger lab operated at the
same efficiency.
Even the trend toward automation does not seem to have a significant
impact with increased size. Only a small percent of a large number of
possible determinations is truly automated. The inherent set-up or
preparation time is substantial, which may account for this lack of
significant change with size.
Figure 3-4 introduces a revenue line onto our cost model to show relative
breakeven and profitability ratios for the three ranges of labs. As we
discussed earlier, the lack of a standard package of determinations per
sample makes it difficult to develop a precise common denominator for
costs per unit and revenue per unit. For calculations, $35 per sample
(consisting of 10 determinations) was selected as the average income for
projection purposes. This revenue figure is consistent with our findings
for the majority of labs sampled and equates well with the unit production
costs of an equivalent sample over the relevant range.
Table 3-17 is a summary of the significant relationships developed from
figure 3-4.
TABLE 3-17. BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Range
Brea]
keven
Maximum
Probable
Samples
Revenue
Samples
Revenue
Samples
Revenue
A
B
C
2,700
4,200
7,600
$ 95,000
145,000
265,000
4,000
8,000
14,000
$140,000
280,000
490,000
3,700
7,000
11,500
$130,000
245,000
400,000
3-34
-------
4-00-
w
-r
cj 200-
il'
-------
As a percent of total capacity, the breakeven point for the smaller labs is
higher (60 - 70 percent of capacity) than for the larger labs (50 - 60
percent of capacity). This may account for the greater price competitiveness
among the smaller labs as discussed earlier.
In summary, the costs and procedures associated with the specialized
water quality analytical industry tends to favor small business formations
(5 to 25 employees). The investment/labor trade offs, usually found in
larger enterprises, are offset by the sporadic and changing load factors
which tend to impact more on the high investment, larger labs. The net
result is that the P/V relationships for the small lab do not vary signifi-
cantly from the larger ones.
Based on this analysis, in a total water quality program, the analytical
costs may not be the most significant factor. The more significant factor
may be the costs associated with getting samples to the lab on some basis
that insures relatively even work flow and optimum scheduling of the
separate determinations. In other words, not only are the direct costs
associated with collection and transmittal of sample proportionately high,
but also their rate of submission to the lab can have an important subsequent
cost impact.
There may also be problems associated with the shelf-life of a water quality
sample which may affect not only the gathering and transportation costs,
but also the analytical costs within the lab. If the shelf-life of a water
sample is short, requiring very limited turn-around time in the lab, then
the ability to level out peaks and valleys in production demand are limited.
The resulting uneven work flow would have a serious effect on increasing
costs.
Therefore, in a total water quality program, the number and location of
the sampling points may be a key factor in evaluating total program costs.
Equally important is the need to determine the content and frequency of the
3-36
-------
"standard" sample or package for analysis. It is important for planning
purposes not only to know the number of determinations required but also
their type and interrelationship.
Once the sampling stations are generally identified and the resulting
analytical determinations defined, it is then possible to estimate the size
and quantity of labs required to satisfy these specifications given an
economic time-distance factor for transporting "live" samples to the
analytical center. There are basically three ranges of labs which may be
appropriate. It is extremely important that the proper size lab be
established for each area to ensure that the capacity of the facilities meets
the demand and that the demand exceeds the breakeven point of the lab.
Once the number and types (range) of labs are determined, then the total
analytical costs for the program can be estimated. Figure 3-5 shows
total analytical costs for the three ranges of activity previously established.
If it is determined, for example, that 1000 type "A" labs, 750 type "BM
and 500 type "C" labs are required to satisfy total program requirements,
the costs associated with each can be determined from figure 3-5 and sum-
marized to arrive at a universal system.
The total cost of the program will be determined first by establishing the
type and quantity of determinations to be made and then by estimating the
overall lab structure required to support that program using the relation-
ships established herein.
3-37
-------
-------
Section 4
COASTAL ZONE WATER QUALITY
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
4. 1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR COASTAL WATER QUALITY
MONITORING
Definitive monitoring requirements are discussed in various inventory
sections, and in the appendices. This section discusses the general
requirements for monitoring based on EPA, state and local procedures
and plans.
This section also discusses sampling and sampling errors applicable
to any monitoring program.
Legislation presently proposed sets as a national goal an end to the
discharge of all pollutants into the waterways by 1985. Clean water is a
reasonable goal, but to achieve that goal, adequate water quality standards
are required to support man's use requirements and yet maintain the
aquatic environment at an acceptable level. Effective water quality
management is a part of the state standards. In order to have effective
water quality management, monitoring is required. The objectives of a
comprehensive monitoring program for water quality management are to
identify:
(1) Water quality data bases and trends.
4-1
-------
(2) Improvements in water quality produced by abatement measures
undertaken.
(3) Emerging water quality problems in sufficient time to effect
adequate preventive measures.
(4) Compliance and non-compliance with water quality criteria.
4.1.1 Monitoring Programs
Four types of monitorirg have been defined by EPA:
Ambient trend monitoring, to measure conditions and trends in the ambient
environment in relation to standards and guidelines.
Source monitoring, to locate and measure effluents/emissions, and to
assess the compliance status of pollution sources.
An extensive effort of self-monitoring exists today in support of the Refuse
Act Permit Program applications and waste discharge requirements for
local water quality control authorities. This vast quantity of data is
potentially useful and should be made available. Federal support and
guidance should be given to local and state operations to encourage that
data collected will be included in a national system. Problems of data
format, quality, methods and self-incrimination must be resolved before
inclusion of this source of data becomes a full reality.
Case preparation monitoring, to gather evidence for enforcement actions.
Monitoring of water quality to support litigation and associated quality
control measures are best conducted by those agencies specifically assigned
enforcement responsibilities. The methods and procedures required to
ensure data integrity are beyond the requirements of normal data collection
procedures. There must be a system whereby case preparation data can
4-2
-------
be analyzed and compared to other forms of data (i. e., ambient trend data)
so that long-term trends or problems can be identified.
Research monitoring, to support research activities. Diverse bodies of
data are needed to adequately attack research problems; a comprehensive
data resource sharing system will facilitate exchange of such data.
4.1.2 The Coastal Environment
The coastal environment can be divided into three generalized zones for the
purpose of water quality monitoring, each zone having some distinct
characteristics, yet often lacking sharp boundaries. The fourth zone,
the oceanic zone, is added for completeness.
A brief description of each zone and its monitoring requirements is pro-
vided, based largely on the National Plan for Coastal and Oceanic Water
Quality Monitoring, as prepared by the subcommittee on Marine Environ-
mental Baselines and Monitoring, of the Interagency Committee on Marine
Environmental Prediction of 1972.
The freshwater zone includes those areas where the water is unaffected
by salt water, but is within the coastal zone. Primarily, these are the
streams and rivers reaching the coast.
The estuarine zone is that portion of the coast, land and water, where the
sea water is measurably diluted with fresh water derived from land
drainage and river flow, wherein the body of water has an unimpaired
connection with the open sea. In common usage, this generally includes
at least the following: estuaries, lagoons, salt marshes, harbors and
channels. In this zone, human influence on the marine environment is
felt most directly.
4-3
-------
The coastal zone includes the coastal waters along the remainder of the
shoreline, beyond the estuarine zone, and extends seaward through the
territorial sea and the contiguous zone. This zone experiences nearby
oceanic activities, as well as physical and chemical processes affected by
the land mass, stream runoff, the tides, near-shore and littoral currents,
and wavedriven mixing processes. The width and type of the continental
shelf, the sediments or rock on the shelf and the type and configuration of
the shoreline have an effect on this zone. Changes in water quality, in the
coastal zone, are generally seasonal, but may be severely perturbed by
climatic upheavals.
The oceanic zone includes those marine waters beyond the seaward limit
of the contiguous zone. Within this zone, water quality may exhibit some
seasonal changes, but primary water quality changes of concern are often
long-range changes on trends in ocean water quality.
4.1. 3 Monitoring Factors
Factors that affect monitoring are:
(1) State Water Quality Standards.
(2) Station Location.
(3) Sampling Method.
(4) Sampling Frequency.
(5) Available Funds.
The state water quality standards - These have been specifically discussed
as criteria, water uses and implementation plans in paragraph 2. 3 of this
report. At the time standards were developed, most state water pollution
problems were associated with fresh waters, the coastal zone had not yet
become a major concern, and therefore the majority of the state standards
are for rivers, streams and lakes.
4-4
-------
Unknown in the coastal zone is the parametric rate of change (trends), the
natural variability, and the different degrees of effect that the changes may
have on the organisms. Not fully understood is the fluctuation of those
parameters of the environment, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen,
salinity, BOD, pH, turbidity etc., which are controlling mechanisms for
the marine population distributions. Maximum and minimum values,
duration of change (period of increase, plateau, and decrease), and ratio
change (ranging in intervals from hours to decades) in these environmental
parameters must be intensively studied and monitored so that pollution
effects due to man's activity may be separated from natural environmental
fluctuations.
Station locations - Monitoring should be conducted at stations that would
reflect the earliest indication of pollutants, water quality changes, and
the effects of these on water uses. The selection of the specific location
of a station should be made by the agency involved. Additional station
locations might be selected based on available platforms and ease of access.
Outside of a specific case study area, the location of stations should be
representative of the area to be monitored, such as near the entrance of
major rivers to the coastal zone, in major embayments, near population
centers, and in near-shore ocean currents.
Station locations can be categorized as either "fixed stations" or "variable
stations". Fixed stations are considered to be those at a specific location
where there is some type of marker or facility, such as a pier or platform,
a buoy, or a specific location on the shore. Variable stations are those
stations which exist by map or navigation location and are not a specific
marked reference point. Depending upon the conditions at the time of
sampling, variable station locations will inadvertently be in error. Fixed
stations lend themselves to the collection of routine long-term data by
automatic methods, using high sampling rates. Variable stations generally
require ships, boats, or other means of reaching the station and normally
use manual methods to collect the samples for further laboratory analyses.
4-5
-------
Sampling methods - Important factors in the choice of methods for water
quality monitoring are the purpose and location of the monitoring site,
the required frequency of measurement, the types of pollutant sources
affecting the monitoring site, the technical feasibility of a reliable
measurement, the design of the monitoring equipment, and the cost.
The existing methods for conducting water quality monitoring are: manual
sample collecting, preservation and associated laboratory analysis,
portable insitu sensor systems, fixed automatic monitoring systems, and
remote sensing. At present, manual sampling is used in most cases
because sensors and systems are generally in the prototype stages, with
only a few systems in operation in the coastal zone. It is expected that in
the future, considerable water quality monitoring in the coastal zone will
be done automatically by insitu sensing at fixed stations, or by remote
sensing from aircraft and satellite.
Although manual sample collection may not be the most cost effective or
time effective, it is utilized extensively because of its simplicity and
because there are numerous people who have been trained technically
in sample collection and sample preservation. One advantage of this
method is that one sample can be used for the determination of a wide
variety of parameters. Presently, some new techniques are being used
whereby on-site analyses can be performed for those parameters which
are sometimes difficult to preserve.
Portable insitu sensor systems have become more reliable and are being
used by more and more agencies. Generally, their use is either an
alternate method or used in conjunction with manual sampling. There are
many advantages to this on-site technique, such as the ease with which a
system can be used by a relatively inexperienced technician, the speed
at which data can be collected, the number of parameter measurements
that can be made at any one given time, the high frequency of measure-
ments, and the real-time/synoptic data for the field scientist. This latter
4-6
-------
advantage is very significant in providing the chief scientist with vital
program decision information. In the monitoring inventory it was found
that there are about 50 fixed automatic monitoring stations (systems)
in the coastal zone. It is estimated that there are an additional 300 stations
(systems) in the remainder of the country. In general, the systems used
in the coastal zone monitor only a few parameters such as temperature,
pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and turbidity. Such automatic systems
are of special value in areas where individual parameters may change
very rapidly, or could go undetected if they were not monitored continuously.
Most of these stations are shore stations, but there are a few that are on
buoys. In the coastal zone, the main problem with these systems is that of
maintenance. Other problems include need for proper calibration, life of
the sensors, fouling, and vandalism.
The choice between continuous automatic monitoring and periodic grab
samples should be made on the basis of the physical, chemical, and biolo-
gical processes involved, as well as logistics and cost-effectivity.
Processes subject to cyclic variations need to be examined intensively
within a cycle in order to study the process or, less desirably, at the
same exact point in the cycle to determine long-term trends. Automatic
recording sensors operated continuously may be the preferred monitoring
approach as compared to periodic grab samples at locations that are subject
to large and fluctuating waste loads and/or fluctuations in dispersion or
flow rates.
Remote sensing is a relatively new monitoring technique involving the use
of aircraft or satellites. In general, this technique, when used for water,
is a photogametric technique, which measures the reflected radiation and
through the use of special filters isolates and records the various wave
lengths on special film. This method can be used to detect such things as
oil spills and turbid water masses wherein the differences in color define
the various water mass. Infrared techniques are also used in remote
sensing for the detection of heat sources and the dissipation of thermal
plumes from power plants.
4-7
-------
Sampling frequency - Sample measurement error for most parameters is
generally known, but the parameter error in most cases is not known; that
is, the measure of each sample can be accurately quantified but the meaning
of the measurement relative to variability is a problem. It is necessary to
measure a parameter continuously for a given period of time in order to
determine the variability and the sampling rate. Presently, within budget
constraints, it is only possible to estimate how good the data is.
In monitoring, it is necessary to establish interval of time between
samples. It is necessary to have some knowledge of the presampled
data spectrum; i.e., the time-frequency nature of the phenomenon,
including noise. If a particular parameter is continuously monitored at
a specific monitoring site, and a frequency analysis of the record is per-
formed, one could determine the highest frequency present and the high-
frequency cutoff rate. These three functions determine explicitly the
total root mean square error due to aliasing for a particular parameter;
this error is relatable to the total parameter error, but it not related to
the sampling error caused by the instrumentation system. It is generally
not sufficient just to apply the sampling theorem, because quantitative
measures of the parameter error cannot be obtained without a higher
degree of measurement sophistication. The sampling frequency, then,
must be chosen with an allowable error in mind, which is commensurate
with the other errors induced by either the instrumentation system or
technique. The aliasing error due to sampling is irreversible; i.e. , it
cannot thereafter be separated out by any filtering or desampling
mechanisms. In general, these errors occur if parameter frequencies are
higher than those obtained by the selected sampling frequency, regardless
of whether or not such frequency components are of interest.
Generally these sampling concepts are applicable where a spectral analysis
of the data or an analog reproduction of the parameter is required. It must
be pointed out that because of the lack of knowledge of the real spectrum of
a parameter, even means, averages, ranges and trends can be highly biased.
4-8
-------
It is incumbent upon the planner for sampling/monitoring programs to
understand the variations of the parameters in time and space to assure
data integrities.
Sampling errors can be such as to completely invalidate the resulting
data. It can be shown that due to sampling alone, there is a large
systematic error in the spectrum and a large random error in the Fourier
transform. For example, this error amounts to about 30% at the Nyquist
frequency (2 samples per cycle) and falls off at lower frequencies inversely
to the actual spectrum. The error can be found for a known sampling
frequency and then the data obtained can be labeled for the error present
in that parameter. This later method is the usual reactive process
applied for established systems under evaluation. Additional theoretical
background information for proper sampling frequency determination vs.
errors is covered in appendix O.
Generally, monitoring can be classified either as continuous (analog) or
sampled (digital). Analog methodology should be used until a good measure
of the parameter spectrum is obtained, after which it becomes possible to
establish a reasonable sampling frequency for a digital process. It will
be necessary to resort to the continuous process whenever the forcing
function is known to change, and/or routinely, for a period from time-to-
time to re-establish the proper sampling frequency compatible with the
allowable parameter error. When sampling methodology is used, it can
either be regular or irregular. Irregular sampling is difficult to analyze,
but is better than no sampling. Regular sampling is straightforward and
convenient, both from the monitoring and the analysis standpoint.
The four zones, described earlier, each require different water quality
monitoring programs and sampling frequencies. The following are general
indications of monitoring considerations that might apply to general areas,
but do not apply to an area immediately around point discharges:
4-9
-------
(1) The Freshwater Zone. Because this zone is important for water as
a consumptive resource, it is necessary that detailed monitoring
be conducted at a large number of points on nearly a continuous
basis.
(2) The Estuarine Zone. Adequate monitoring of this zone requires
sampling at higher frequencies than in the coastal and oceanic
zones. As a minimum, monitoring should be at a frequency more
than twice that of the tidal cycle or other constraining cyclical
phenomenon (such as industrial or municipal pollution load).
(3) The Coastal Zone. Changes in the nearshore zone are generally
seasonal with rapid local changes due to climatic changes, storms
or floods. As a minimum, monitoring should be conducted
monthly, but more often in regions subject to special problems.
(4) The Oceanic Zone. Although this zone exhibits some seasonal
changes, long-range trends are the point of interest. Monitoring
at seasonal intervals is a minimum today, but may be increased
in the future.
Available funds - The extent of water quality monitoring is based on the
availability of funds. In general, with the existing methods, continuous
sampling is not conducted unless the budget is large, or if the parameters
to be measured fluctuate rapidly. Where money has not been available for
the purchase of capital equipment, portable insitu systems are not normally
used. The cost of the measuring method involves a tradeoff with the number
of personnel, the number of parameters to be measured, the types of
parameters to be measured, the frequency of measurement, the area to
be covered, the number of measurements sites, and the laboratory
analyses required.
4-10
-------
4. 2 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER QUALITY IN AREAS OF
WASTE DISCHARGE
The effective management of marine waste disposal practice, and its effect
on coastal water quality, must include the precise characterization of both
the waste stream and the receiving water. Efficient monitoring programs,
properly coordinated among relevant agencies at all levels of government
and industry, will help determine the effects of marine waste disposal and
provide information to improve environmental quality. State standards set
forth water use, water quality criteria, and an implementation plan to
assure meeting the specified criteria. Needs for monitoring specific
criteria differ among the states, and with specific geographical areas
within a state. In most states no specific monitoring programs are defined.
Thus, it is not practical to specify a detailed set of parameters to be
monitored on a national basis to meet the needs of all the federal and state
agencies. It is, however, practical to define criteria and parameters of
interest. Because of the difference in the environmental conditions along
the coastal zone of most states, and in order to be truly comprehensive,
a monitoring program should be designed to fit a specific discharge and
conditions of the local waters at that site.
The range of parameters that could be considered is enormous, but most
state standards have only a few well defined criteria (see paragraph 2.3).
Initial efforts in monitoring must be concentrated on those parameters that
provide decision information on heavily polluted areas and pollutant sources.
A specific standard must be developed for sample collection, for procedure
preparation, for analytical methods, for defining data/information and the
reporting of units for each parameter to be followed by everyone.
Effective water quality management is a part of the standards. In order to
have effective water quality management, at least three categories of water
quality monitoring are required. First, individual plant effluent monitoring
is essential to assess the effects of each waste source on the receiving
waters into which it discharges. Second, the portion of the coastal waters
4-11
-------
receiving wastes must be examined to ensure attainment and maintenance
of water quality levels consistent with state water quality criteria. Third,
the effects on water quality by manipulating the state's waters through
water resource development projects must be determined. These three
categories of monitoring should provide the information necessary for
efficient management of pollution control facilities and the effective
administration of water quality criteria.
While the marine environment appears to be capable of accommodating large
quantities of raw sewage or sewage sludge, the marine disposal of this
material has been associated with many recorded environmental problems.
Sewer outfalls and waste dump sites require somewhat different monitoring
approaches. The major problem materials that must be observed in
sewage are: oxygen-consuming organic materials, nutrients, and bacteria.
In solid sewage sludge, oxygen-consuming organic material remains prime,
but to it must be added toxic materials and heavy metals. Although the
bulk of dredge spoil is inert material, it is commonly contaminated with
petro-chemicals from port activity, heavy metals and pesticides. Acid
waste and other chemical disposal operations require additional special-
ized monitoring efforts, as also do those for debris and cellar dirt. The
monitoring requirements should be determined from the nature of the
material dumped in each case and the characteristics of the dump site.
Problems of water quality monitoring for waste management in the coastal
zone have been clearly outlined (17). The study identified two major
components of the overall problem:
(1) The identification of the quantities and characteristics of wastes
generated by various activities, and
(2) the evaluation of the reactions of the waste components in the
aquatic environment.
4-12
-------
This study indicates that generally adequate information is available on flow
rates and common organic constituents of municipal wastes; however,
information on new and exotic materials, waste emission rates, decay
rates, biostimulation and toxicity factors are generally unknown and these
may require special monitoring considerations at some specific rates.
The selection of the variables to be measured, frequency of measurement,
and analyses to be made depend upon the classification of the water, the
general characteristics of the discharge, the specific water uses in the
area, and the amount of available funds. The exact mix of variables to be
monitored is a function of the discharge, the local conditions, and scientific
interest in the problem.
The parameters to be considered in a water quality monitoring program
should be guided by the following principles:
(1) A suite of measurements should be collected to describe basic
physical, chemical, and biological state of the water. These
measurements include, but are not restricted to salinity, pH,
current speed and direction, dissolved oxygen, coliforms, tempera-
ture, and certain meteorological parameters.
(2) Any routine parameters should be those that are considered
absolutely essential for interpreting or evaluating the effects of
the wastes on the receiving waters. Duplications of measurements
should be minimized, making maximum use of data for multiple
analysis, as practicable.
(3) Analyses of second-level significance should be included, depending
upon the ability to interpret the results and the cost of the
analyses.
4-13
-------
(4) Newer, less conventional parameters should be added as practicable
and necessary to meet requirements.
(5) Information should be made available on the accuracy and precision
of the sampling method, as well as related to the laboratory analyses
for each parameter.
The specific analyses required for the effluent and receiving waters have
been summarized. These items are of critical importance in any marine
monitoring program and as such will be listed again below:
For waste discharges:
(1) Floatable matter—method needs development;
(2) Total and organic suspended solid—methods adequate;
(3) Acute toxicity—method needs review;
(4) Persistent pesticides—method needs review;
(5) Persistent organic compounds—method needs development;
(6) Biostimulants—method needs development;
(7) Gross heavy metals—method needs development;
(8) Coliforms (or equivalent) — method under continuous review;
(9) Radioactivity—methods adequate.
For Receiving Waters:
Analyses
Restricted
water
Ocean
water
Water column:
Physical:
(a) Floatables and films
(b) Clarity
(c) Temperature . . .
X
X
X
X
X
X
4-14
-------
Analyses
Restricted
water
Ocean
water
Biological:
(a) Coliforms X X
(b) Biostimulants X X
(c) Biomass characterization X X
Chemical:
(a) Dissolved oxygen X
(b) Chlorosity X X
(c) pH XX
(d) Nitrates X
(e) Phosphates X
Sediments-
Physical:
(a) Particle size distribution X X
(b) Temperature X X
Biological: Benthos characterization X X
Chemical:
(a) Organic matter X X
(b) HgS (presence or absence) X X
(c) pH XX
4-15/4-16
-------
REFERENCES
1- The National Estuarine Pollution Study, Report of the Secretary of
the Interior to the United States Congress, March 25, 1970.
2. The Twentieth Edition, November 1970, Steam-Electric Plant
Factors, National Coal Association, Washington, D. C.
3. Environmental Effects of Producing Electric Power, Hearings
before the joint committee on Atomic Energy Congress of the U. S.,
Part 2, Vol II.
4. Nuclear Power Reactors in the U. S., U. S. Atomic Energy Com-
mission, March 31, 1972, U. S. A. E. C. Technical Information
Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
5. Smith, D. D., and R. P. Brown, 1970. Ocean Disposal of Barge-
Delivered Liquid and Solid Wastes from U. S. Coastal Cities.
Prepared by Dillingham Corporation for the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Bureau of Solid Waste Management under contract
No. PH 86-68-203.
6. Dallaire, Eugene E. Ocean Dumping: What and Where, If at All ?
Civil Engineering - ASCE, Nov. 1971.
7. Council on Environmental Quality, 1970. Ocean Dumping — A
National Policy. A report to the President. U. S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
8. Brown, Robert P. and Shenton, Edward H. Evaluating Waste
Disposal at Sea - The Critical Role of Information Management.
Marine Technology Society 7th Annual Conference Preprints, 1971.
1
-------
9. Oceanographer of the Navy and University - National Oceanography
Laboratory System, Oceanographic Ship Operating Schedules,
published tri-annually, latest May 1972.
10. Compass Publications Inc. , Under Sea Technology Handbook —
Directory,1971-1972 edition.
11. Data Publications, Hydrospace Buyers Guide, Volume 7, 1969.
12. U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office, Oceanographic Vessels of the
World, 1963.
13. California State Polytechnic College, Biological Sciences Dept.,
David H. Montgomery, Editor, Directory of Marine Science
Programs and -Facilities on the Pacific Coast, 1970 Edition.
14. Coastal Plains Center for Marine Development Services, Develop-
ment Activities in the Marine Environment of the Coastal Plains
Region - Directory of Facilities, March 1971.
15. Texas A & M University, Norman C. Whitehorn, Marine Resource
Capabilities in Texas - Directory of Facilities, May 1972.
16. Collation, Evaluation, and Presentation of Scientific and Technical
Data Relative to the Marine Disposal of Liquid Wastes (1964^ the
State Water Quality Control Board, Resources Agency, State of
California.
17. Waste Management Concepts for the Coastal Zone. National
Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Washington,
D. C. 1970.
2
-------
APPENDIX A
COASTAL ZONE CROSS REFERENCE LIST
-------
COASTAL ZONE CROSS REFERENCE LIST
In order to acquire data on the coastal zone from existing national data
banks, a machine readable definition of the zone was required. This
list, termed the IEC Coastal Zone Cross Reference File, Table A-1, was
generated manually by the staff at IEC/OSD and then keypunched, verified
and placed on magnetic tape. This list cross references the following
items for 570 coastal geographic subunits in a total of 325 coastal
counties:
1. Minor drainage basins (geographic subunits) in terms of USGS
OWD map numbers and map letters.
2. State and County numbers from the Federal Information Processing
(2)
Standards Publications.
3. 1960 Census state and county numbers.
(3)
4. EPA region numbers.
5. IEC case study areas numbers.
6. Latitude/longitude of coastline bounds.
7. National estuarine inventory ERA bounds.
(4)
8. IEC ocean region and subregion numbers.
The cross reference file was used extensively to access several
data banks throughout the country.
A-l
-------
The list was generated primarily by reference to the maps furnished with
the USGS OWDC catalog on water data information. These maps are based
on slightly modified river-basin maps prepared by the Subcommittee on
Hydrology of the Inter-Agency Committee on Water Resources in 1960 (now
the Committee on Hydrology of the Water Resources Council). Each map is
given a number and then has been divided into subunits identified by a
letter code. The subunits were derived from an existing set of base
maps prepared by the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of
Agriculture (Atlas of River Basins of the United States: June 1963).
The subunits may be considered minor drainage basins, and the cross
reference file was initiated as a list of "coastal" drainage basins,
i.e., a list of map numbers and letters designating the coastal basins.
The selection of particular basins was made manually through examination
of the OWDC and other topological maps and atlases. Where a clear
definition of "coastal" zone did not exist, a decision was made as to
the applicability of a particular minor basin to the purpose of coastal
zone water quality monitoring. Since the primary purpose of the map
number/letter list was to select data from the OWDC national file on
monitoring activities, most consideration was given to the impact on
retrieval of this information.
The smallest geographic units defined in the list were unions between
minor basins and a state or county boundary. Figure A-l illustrates the
encoding process and demonstrates the conventions used:
A-2
-------
EXAMPLE op £AJCOO/*J
F'SAJ/AJSULA
l7
L6
/-O
,99 E WASHINGTON L7 L&
Ci7
99 e WASMlUfcTOK LIO
L9
UIO
/SLAhJO
(OAS'NB)
A-3
-------
Condition
Basin overlaps whole county 99 C Lincoln LI L2
County overlaps two basins 99 C Jefferson L2 L3
(different map letters, different 99 D Jefferson L3 L4
bounds)
County & Basin overlaps a peninsula 99 D Washington L4 L5
(same map letters, one set of iden- 99 D Washington L5 L6
tical bounds).
Islands (same map letters, different 99 E Washington L7 L8
sets of bounds) 99 E Washington L9 L10
Appended to each entry in the list of geographic units were the cross
references, i.e., state and county numbers, EPA region numbers, etc. In
this manner the entire cross reference file was built. This data was
keypunched, entered into a computer, and an editing program was executed
on it to proof each item as much as possible for proper format, content
and limits resulting in a verified cross reference list.
A "working" or abridged cross reference file (Table A-2) was generated
from the main file containing only the list of coastal states and counties
with cross references to EPA regions, IEC case study areas, and coastal
regions. The coastal region codes are shown in Table A-3.
A-4
-------
REFERENCES
(1) U. S. Geological Survey, Office of Water Data Coordination, Catalog
of Information on Water Data, Edition 1970.
(2) General Services Administration, Office of Finance, Geographical
Location Codes, September 1969
(3) U. S. Bureau of the Census. County and City Data Book, 1967
(4) National Estuarine Inventory, "Handbook of Descriptors"
A-5
-------
>
I
as
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
woe
IMP STATE
M LET CMIMTY
1970 I 960 EPA IEC
CENSUS CENSUS RES- CASE
ST CI ST C* 18N STUDY
B0UNDS '
FIRST
LAT LBNG
SEC0ND
LAT L0HG
ESTUARINE
FIRST
8CEAN
REGISTER AREA RE8IM
LAST SUB
1?
<
AL
BALj-iIS
CI
¦-C3
21
CC2
C*
PC
ic:1&:*7
87:32:59
3Cil6:*7
87:3*:il
SE*200000000
SE*200000000
09
* "
12
L
AL
BALI'V. IM
CI
-C3
Cl
i.cr
c*
00
3C:i6:*7
87:33135
3o:i3:*7
88:00:00
SE*201000000
SE*300000000
09
*
13
A
*L
fieur
Cl
097
01
c»y
c*
CO
ic:13:*7
ss:co:cc
3o:i9:*7
88:15:35
SE*300000000
SE**OOOOOOOQ
09
*
13
f--
AL
Cl
097
Cl
C»9
c*
OC
3c:i9:*7
«&:i5:35
30:22* *7
88:23!23
SE**00000000
SE**00000000
09
*
71
L
CA
AL* iCOA
C6
0C1
Cb
CJl
09
Ob
I7:b3:23
12c:22:*7
37S3*U1
122:03:35
SWC602000000
SW0602000000
12
5
71
L
CA
C1MH» C«STA
C6
ol3
cs
C07
C9
riR
37:58:*7
12c:22:*7
37:53123
122:225*7
SWC602000000
SW0602000000
1?
6
72
P
CA
COMK* CPS* A
Cf.
013
cb
C07
C9
3?:oii:ii
121*52'11
37:58:*7
122!22!*7
SWC602C20300
SW0602020301
12
6
7 P.
>5
CA
C9NTPA C3STA
C6
013
C5
CC7
09
O1".
38:C8:59
I22:i6;u
37:58:*7
122!22:*7
SHC602020000
SW0602020000
12
6
73
<
CA
DEL K9RTE
C6
1.15
Cb
COo
09
00
*1:33:35
i2*:o*:*7
*i:2s:*7
12*:o*iii
S4C200000000
SW0200000000
13
1
73
V
CA
C*
k, 15
05
008
C9
00
*2:cc:cc
I2*:i2:35
*1:33:35
12*:c*l*7
SWC100000000
SW0200000000
13
1
73
K
CA
~¦JfS-L'JT
C6
023
cs
012
09
00
*1:28:»7
i2t:c*iil
*o:58:*7
12*:05159
SWC200000000
SW0200000000
13
1
72
T
CA
t-o'-tRLOT
c6
0e3
05
Cl?
C9
00
*c:37:*7
I2*:i9:n
*c:ooioc
i2*:oo:oo
SMC*00000000
swo*oooooooo
13
1
7?.
V
CA
C6
023
Cb
212
09
00
»c;*c:*7
12»:17 i59
*c:37".*7
I2*ti9:ii
SMC300000000
SW0300000000
13
1
72
X
CA
t-U^ifLOl
C6
C23
CS
Gl2
C9
CO
*C:5g;«7
I2t:c&:59
»c:5s:*7
ls*:o7:*7
SWC300000000
SW0300000000
13
1
7c
CA
kjfK^LDT
C6
v,e3
Cb
Cl?
C9
no
»c:55:»7
12*:C7:*7
*c:*o:*7
12*:17 i59
SWC300000000
SW0300000000
13
1
7C
p
C*
L«s ANGEt.ES
r.6
037
C5
Cl?
09
00
3*:c2:59
H8:55:*7
33:*6:*7
118:13:*7
S41*00000000
SW1500000000
11
3
72
f*
CA
LOS AM-.ClES
C6
037
05
C19
09
00
13:*6i*7
116!1C!*7
33:*6:*7
118:131*7
SM1500000000
SW1500000000
11
3
7C
N
CA
L3S ANGELAS
C6
037
05
019
C9
00
33:*6:*7
lia:i3:*7
33:*6:*7
118:101*7
SW1500000000
SW1500000000
11
3
72
R
CA
f ARj\
C6
0*1
Cb
C21
C9
05
17:59
123:oo:cc
•37:*9SU
122J32159
SWOSOOOOOOOO SU0600000000
12
7
72
R
CA
f ARtN
C6
0*1
Cb
C?1
09
Ob
37:
C65
CE
C Pb
09
Ob
38:cs:59
12£:35:59
38:08:59
122:16:*7
SW060Z020000
SW0602020000
12
6
7C
w
CA
8RA>GC
C6
Cb9
C5
C3C
C9
oo
33:3? :59
117:58:*7
33!37i*7
117:56159
SW1500000000
SW1500000000
11
2
72
N
CA
eRA-.GE
C6
Cb9
C5
C30
09
OC
33:*5:CO
lis:i3:»7
33:38:59
117:581*7
SW1500000000
SW1500000000
11
2
70
*
CA
SRA'.GL
rf-
C59
05
030
09
00
33:37:*7
117:56:59
33:23:59
117:35:59
SM1500000000
SW1500000000
11
2
70
M
CA
SAN OIFG9
c<>
(.73
Ob
037
09
nc
32:33:35
H7:c7:*7
32:32:23
117 S07:11
SM1600000000 SW1600000000
11
1
70
T
CA
san sicsn
C6
C73
C5
C37
C9
00
33:13:11
117:23:59
32:33.-35
H7:o7:*7
SM1600000000
SW1600000000
11
1
72
J
CA
SAN CIEG6
C6
C73
05
C37
C9
00
33:16:11
117:26:23
33:13:11
117:23:59
SW1600000000
SW1600000000
11
1
70
<
CA
SAS CIEG3
C6
C73
Cb
037
C9
OC
33:23:59
117:35:59
33:16:11
117:26:23
SHI600000000
SW1600000000
til
72
L
CA
SAN FRa^CISC?
C6
C75
05
C36
C9
05
37:*3:11
122:19:ii
37:*7!59
122:23:59
SW0602000000
SW0602000000
72
L
CA
SAN FRANC 15C?
C6
075
05
036
09
05
37:*7:59
122:23:59
37:*3:ii
122:3C!C0
SWC600000000
SW0600000000
12
*
71
r
CA
SAN LUIS 5BISPP
C6
079
Cb
0*0
C?
oc
3*:59:23
I2c:38:59
3*:5«:*7
120:37)11
SWICOOOOOOOO
SWl000000000
12
1
71
72
G
L
CA
CA
SAN LU'S ft«ISP'*
SAK VATE9
C6
C6
u79
C81
C5
C5
o*c
0*1
C9
C?
OC
05
35:*7:59
37!35:?3
121:22:*7
I22:cs:59
34:59:23
37:*3:u
120:38:59
122}19:il
SW1000000000
SWC602000000
SWlOOOOOOOOQ
SW0602000000
12
12
1
~
J\
L
CA
SAN »ATE«
C6
OBI
C5
C«1
09
Ob
37:»3:li
12e:3o:cc
37;07:11
122:18:35
SWC700000000
SW0700000000
12
*
71
r
CA
Santa Barbara
C6
083
05
0*2
09
3C
3*:57:35
12c:38:23
3*:»i:59
120:3*1*7
SW1100000000
SWl100000000
11
5
71
B
CA
SANTA 3A3BARA
C6
C83
05
C*2
09
OC
3*:*c:«7
12C:35:59
3*i20!59
119:26:59
SW1100000000
SWl100000000
11
5
71
C
CA
SANTA PAR6ARA
C6
v83
05
0*2
C?
00
3*:*l:59
i2c:3*:*7
3*:*o:*7
120:35:59
S*1100000000
SWl100000000
11
5
71
F
CA
SANTA BARBARA
C6
OS 3
05
0*2
C9
00
3*:5g;*7
I2c:37:ii
3»:57:35
120:38:23
SW1100000000
SWl100000000
11
5
71
L
CA
SANTA CLARA
c t
085
Cb
C»3
09
05
37:3*:ii
122:c3:35
37:35:23
122:05:59
SWC602
SW0602
12
5
71
L
CA
SANTA
cfc
CB7
C5
c*»
09
OC
37:c7:ii
122:18:35
36;5b:*7
121:51:35
SWC800000000
SW0800000000
12
3
71
K
CA
SANTA CRi,^
C6
CS7
05
0*4
C9
OC
36:55:*7
121:51:35
36.50*59
121:*8I35
SWC800000000
SWOgOOOOOOOO
12
3
72
u
CA
S^Li'.S
r.6
295
05
0*3
C9
05
38:08:59
I2t:16:#7
38:o*:ii
121:52:11
5^0602020200
SW0602020301
12
6
72
R
CA
S0N^MA
"6
Q97
05
0*9
09
05
38:05:59
122:2«:*7
38:08:59
122:35!59
SNC602020000
SW0602020000
12
8
72
R
CA
5"\>"A
C6
J97
Cb
0*9
09
05
38:27:35
123:06:35
38:17:59
123:00!C0
SWC50000C000
SW0500000000
12
8
72
S
CA
S"V.":~A
C6
.97
Cb
0*9
09
00
38:28:11
123-.C8-.23
38:27:35
123:06135
SWC500C00000
SW0500000000
12
8
72
T
CA
S*»NmVA
CA
*97
05
0*9
C9
00
38:*6:*7
123:32:59
38:26:11
123:08:23
SWC500000000
SW0500000000
12
8
71
R
CA
VE\Tl»fiA
C6
111
05
C9
00
3*:2c:59
119:26:59
3*:i5:cc
119:22:*7
SW 1100000000
SWl100000000
11
*
71
«
CA
vCM tjRA
cf>
111
C5
0b6
09
00
3*!15:cc
H9:22:»7
3*111159
119:22:11
SW1100000000
SWl100000000
11
*
70
P
CA
VfNTciSA
C*
111
05
056
C
00
3*:ii:59
119:22:ii
3*:02:89
118:551*7
swiioooooono
SWl100000000
11
*
-------
TABLE A-1
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
MDC
MAP STATE
1970
CENSUS
1960 EPA IEC
CENSUS BIG- CASE
BSUNDS
¦ SICMD •
estuajume
>
I
11
LET
MONTY
ST
CI
ST
«
ItN
STUDY
LAT
1.
MS
LAT
LUG
FIRST
c?
C"
FAI-F1ELT
C9
CC1
C7
r.ii
Cl
nc
M
U
»:<»
72
07
*7
*i:oo:cc
73:38:59
NE351lOOCOOO
CP
V
CT
r&t-.t in. "
rn
17
c^i
Cl
3C
M
IC
4?
73
CS)
59
*1$11159
73:c7;«7
ME3508000000
cr
<
ct
f lC-LFS'-i
c
Cl
00
15
3S
7;
20
23
M516!»7
72:22:»7
NE3505000000
Cc
t_
• irv-Lfsr V
rt
^C7
C 7
Cl
3C
*1
U
*7
7e
22
*7
~ 1U5SCC
72:35:59
ME3500000000
c?
C"
K hAvf ^
CO
CC9
C-7
tcs
C'
0"
*1
11
2:t
73
C2
59
*iiio:*7
73:05:59
HE 3508000000
c?
L
c
•.ft. h*'/l \
c
it'
C7
C3i>
Cl
*1
15
cc
7;
35
59
*l:il!23
73:02:59
XE3506000000
C2
*
cl
\L* LS^JN
vJl
C7
cl
cc
VI
16
47
7e
I'
59
»l:i5135
72:2o:h3
NE3505000000
cr
u
CT
LGND"'.
C!3
ill
C7
CJ<>
cl
"?C
*1
?C
2?
7?
C5
23
*1U6S«7
72:17:59
SE3504000000
C?
r;
CT
Ntw LSKJgr*
r,\
C3
ill
c;
CC6
d
oc
<1
2c
23
71
53
59
~1S20J23
72:02:59
SE3502000000
c*
E
DE
kf\t
tc
iCl
Cf.
cci
C3
cc
18
59
??
75
19
*7
38:56:59
75:i9:ii
NE3700000000
e*
o
OL
KFk C*STLt
IC
CC3
C8
;C2
C3
nc
¦?9
5c
59
75
It
£3
39:26!23
75:31:47
NE 3700000000
c*
Z
OL'
CASTLt
IC
-C3
rs
0C2
C3
oc
39
26
23
75
31
»7
39:22:11
75:28147
NE3700000000
C5
A
Of.
1C
CCS
r.s
coi
C3
nc
56
59
75
19
11
38i26!59
75:03:35
NE3700000000
C5
<
CC
*as 'x
11
LCI
C9
C31
Cl
oc
18
*7
59
77
02
59
38:56:23
77:c7:ii
HAC4UOOOOOO
12
L
FL
JAY
lc
.C5
lc
C03
C+
nc
S9
55
11
85
S3
£9
30?16•35
85:58:47
S£3SOOCOOOOO
C9
fl
1?
iC9
1C
COS
r*
on
28
*7
23
8C
12
35
28 i 20:59
80:41:59
SE1*02000000
10
A
fl
ti^EvAKR
1?
:c9
1C
Cw^>
c*
cc
?8
02
23
8C
32
23
27;52!*7
so:30:co
SE1600000000
c?
F
FL
[;=IE .A-C
!c
CC9
10
CCb
c^»
oc
?8
28
47
8C
*6
11
2e:i*i23
8o:40(U
SE1501010000
10
C
FL
BSR .ART
1?
Cll
1C
CCh
C1*
00
36
20
23
8C
0*
*7
25:585*7
80:06:35
SE2100000000
10
r
FL
C'JA ,LSTTr
1?
vlS
10
c*
ic
?6
46
11
82
05
59
26;55«»7
82:08(59
SE2700000000
1 A
* >¦/
}
FL
C'USLPTTE
if;
-15
10
CCH
c*
00
?6
46
47
8c
16
~ 7
26;56:59
82:23:23
SE2700COOOOO
C3
fl
C1T:«JS
12
.17
1C
CC9
no
?8
58
It
Be
23
Z9:OOS35
82:45(00
SE3300000000
3:
If-
fl
cnv.;s
ip
ol7
IC
C09
c^
oc
?8
*2
35
8c
40
11
28:57535
82:45:00
SE3300000000
C9
n
fl
CLAv
IS
*,13
lc
CIO
C4*
00
30
It
?3
81
37
*7
29:*9I»7
81:3»:47
SEllOOOOOOOO
10
c
fl
c?llier
IE
C21
ic
cll
c»
no
?5
*8
35
81
23
59
26:20:59
81:51:35
SE26QOOOOOOO
ic
r
FL
OAOr
1?
ir5
lc
C13
c*
03
?5
58
*7
St
06
35
25:21!35
so:i5:co
SE220OC00C0O
Ci?
FU
C!*Tt
1?
C29
ic
CIS
c*
on
?9
18
35
83
08
59
29s*o:*7
83:23:59
SE3400000000
c
c*
c*
3C
24
35
87
08
59
30:13:35
87:19(47
SE4104000000
cs
n
Ft
FLAJLl.R
12
C.35
IC
cia
c*
00
?9
41
23
81
1?
35
29:25111
81(05:59
SE1300000000
IC
c
fl
f^a-xlk.
12
>37
IC
Cl9
c*
oa
43
11
85
CO
CC
29:*o:li
85:13(47
SE3700000000
11
<
fl
FtiA- KLt'.
1?
L37
IC
CIS
CO
?9
4b
cc
84
5b
11
29(43!11
85:00:00
SE3700000000
11
c
fl
f^A-.ULP:
12
o37
lc
Ul9
oc
?9
57
35
84
19
11
29«45!CC
84(55(11
SE3700000000
11
L
fl
gulf
12
L»5
lc
C?3
c*
nc
?9
4C
11
85
13
*7
29:55:11
85:23:59
SE3800000000
11
K
FL
GULF
1?
i»5
IC
00
?9
43
#7
85
17
59
29:#7!59
85(17(59
SE3801000000
1C
u
FL
HtR ,ANC5
\Z
C53
lr.
027
c*
00
?8
26
59
8c
36
35
28;*2:35
82(40(11
SE3300000000
13
f
Fu
HiLLSt'i^^ua"
1?
C57
IC
no
27
3fi
59
8?
31
«7
27:»g:*7
82:23(59
SE3000000000
in
G
fl
MLL5t"»'"i'>Li'3M
12
C57
IC
C29
c*
oc
?7
49
%7
8c
23
59
27:55:»7
82:28(47
SE3000000000
10
H
fl
~•illsbp^buch
12
vb7
IC
V.**
00
?7
55
%7
8c
28
*7
2«:oi:»7
82:38159
SE3000000000
13
1
fl
I'iOlAN PJVER
1?
L61
lc
C31
c*
oc
?7
52
47
8C
30
CO
27:3ii*7
80:19(11
SE1600000000
11
A
fl
jefkchsss
12
L65
IC
G33
oc
3C
C5
21
85
58
H7
30 05:59
84:00:35
SE3600000000
11
9
fl
jPFrFRStV
12
LtS
IC
CJi
c*
00
3C
C5
59
84
CO
35
3C:05:23
84:04:47
SE3600000000
1C
C
fl
Ltt
12
C71
IC
c*
or
26
tC
59
81
51
35
26:43:^7
82:16:47
SE2700000000
10
r
fl
LFf
1?
L71
IC
C3#>
Cl
oc
P6
^3
47
8c
16
*7
26:46:47
82:16:47
SE2700000000
CO
c
fl
LEVv
12
07b
in
C"5S
C1*
or,
?9
16
47
83
07
11
29:19!11
83:08:59
SE3400000000
C9
J
fl
Lt Vv
1Z
(.75
ic
C3S
c*
nc
?9
01
11
8?
*5
35
29:i6M7
83:07(11
SE3300000000
CO
j
fl
LFVy
12
w75
lc
Ui8
c^
oc
?9
00
35
8e
*5
CC
29:01:11
82i46:u
SE3300000000
10
F
fl
raimtee
12
i*l
IC
C^l
c^»
00
?7
23
T 3
8c
*0
17
27:34:47
82:46(47
SE3000000000
IZ
I
FT
12
C,h5
ic
CHJ
c*
"!C
?7
16
47
8C
11
59
27:io:'»7
80:08(59,
SE1900000000
10
r
fl
i"
lc
C43
c*
oc
?7
IC
47
BC
08
59
2«:5S!47
80:04(47
SE1800000000
»CE«N
REGISTER AREA RCSIfU
LAST SUB
NE35H00C000
NE350800000C
KE3b05000000
NE3500000000
NE350800000C
NE3507000000
NE350500000C
NE3504000000
NE3503000000
NE3502000000
NE370000000U
ME3700000000
NE3700000000
NE3800000000
MA0414000000
SE3900000000
SE1500000000
SE1600000000
SE1501010000
SE2100000000
SE2700000000
SE2700000000
SE3300000000
SE3300000000
SEllOOOOOOOO
SE2600000000
SE2200000000
SE3500000000
SEllOOOOOOOO
SEllOOOOOOOO
SEllOOOOOOOO
SE*20000000o
SE+10%000000
SE1300000000
SE3700000000
SE3700000000
SE3700000000
SE3BOOOOOOOO
SE3S01000000
SE3300000000
SE3000000000
SE3000000000
SE3000000000
SE 1700000000
SE3600000000
SE3600000000
SE2700000000
SE2700000000
SE3400000000
SE3300000000
SE3300000000
SE3000000000
SE1900000000
SE1900000000
09 1
06
06
06
06
08
08
08
08
05
08
06
08
05
05
09
09
09
05
08
08
08
09
09
08
08
05
08
06
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
08
06
06
-------
>
I
00
TABLE A-1
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
¦u&c
I9T0
1960
CPA
I EC
FIR
MM
lP
STATE
CENSUS
CENSUS
REG-
CASE
BM LET
C0UNTY
ST l
»
ST C0
ION
STUDY LAT
1 j
r
tl
riK-, «F
1£ C87
1C
CA*
C*
GC
2s:lc;*7
15
c
FL
>.87
1 c
C*4
c*
nc
r5:?i:35
C9
c
FU
\AS^Au
t?
1C
C*b
C4
00
3C:<+?:35
rc
PL
\AS>Aj
1c
1C
C«b
ct
oc
3C:37:U
1?
FL
12
i.91
1C
04t>
c*
oc
3C:?3:5G
10
r
Tl
PAL"
12
;99
10
obC
c*
no
?6:5g:w
10
FL
PASt*
1?
iCl
10
dl
c*
?B;1C:^
IT
f
PL
PlNCLLAii
lr.
1 C3
1C
C 52
e»
?7:3^;^7
10
U
FU
PTNfLLAG
1?
IC3
1C
Cbc
c*
GC
?7:3b;b9
rc
5
FL
F jT»,Af.
12
1C7
1C
Cb»
c*
nc
?9J49;U7
CG
M
FU
ST» J0HS3
1?
1C9
1C
Sb5
c*
oc
3c:16:31
cg
G
FL
ST. JOM\S
1?
1C9
1C
Obb
c*
oc
3C:16:^7
C9
r.
FL
ST* jSWMS
1?
1C9
1C
ClC
c*
0?.
3c:07: ^7
i:
A
FL
st • Lode
12
111
IC
Cbb
c*
GC
?7:34:il
£
fl
ST- LUCIE.
12
111
1C
Cb6
c*
oc
27;27 J 35
12
fl
SANTA
12
113
1C
Cb7
c*
CH
^c:31:11
1?
PS
FL
SANTA R«»5A
12
113
1C
0b7
c*
G4
3c:2?j*7
12
F
F L
SANiTA VPS*
12
113
10
U57
C9
3C:31;11
12
r
Fl
SAS'TA K33A
IE
113
lc
Cb7
C9
n*
3C:35;23
i:
r
fl
SAWaSSTA
ir
115
1C
;58
c*
GC
26:56:59
C?
s
fl
TAYLftR
12
123
1C
062
c*
CC
P9?4CJ*7
11
A
FL
TAYU3R
12
123
1C
C6c
c*
OC
3CJC3;35
c?
FL
VGL^SIA
12
127
1C
06«
c*
00
29:25:11
11
FL
•.sAK-jLLA
1?
129
lc
C6b
c*
00
3C:05:23
u
C
fl
7. A:23
C9
C
(*A
CA^r;t^
13
v39
11
C20
c*
GC
3C J ^5 J 35
cs
K
GA
CWATHAN
13
Cbl
11
C25
c*
CC
31:^ft:35
c?1
P
GA
CMA.TkAw
13
C51
11
C?b
oc
^?:c?
cs
H
HA
C.MATHA*'
13
oil
11
C.H5
C4
CC
3i:5cs59
c?
GA
CHATHAM
13
C51
11
C25
c4
OC
3 1 : Ag;1 J
C9
A
r»A
GL^'vtN
13
127
11
Ut3
c*
GC
3i:17:59
C?
A
GA
GLY\>;
13
lc7
11
C63
c*
GC
31:19 J A7
C?
<
GA
13
179
11
CS9
c4
OC
3i:*i :23
rs
*
GA
WCI\TCSM
• 3
191
11
095
CC
3i:33:3b
r=
"I
n ^
KC1\TDSH
13
191
11
Cib
c*»
CC
3i:2s:*»7
Hi
HAaAI»
15
CC1
12
C31
C9
GC
18:55:11
Hi
HAWAII
15
CC1
12
'"CI
0?
OC
2c:i5:35
Ml
15
CC3
12
C02
nc
2l:15 ;35
h-j
HI
H«K-:LJL j
15
C.C3
1?
C32
c5
oc
?i:*3:li
Hi
16
CC
m;*5:cc
cf-
IL
17
C31
1*
016
c.$
oc
~i:*3:ii
Ci»
r
IL
t A3:?3 H5:*s:35
sc:i5:3B ?4:3o:cc
8i:p7:3^ 3c:37:11
81!26!51 3C:30 * 35
86-.?3:23 30.122: *7
8c:c»:«7 26:20:23
8^:»7:5<) ?8",26'.59
82:t6!47 27)35:59
82:46:11 7>8 ! 10! *»7
81134:47 H9:22!47
81:23:59 2S;»o:*7
81:22:47 29:41:23
si:38:23 29*37:11
8c:i9:n 27:16:11
8C:22:11 27; 13:11
871C11*7 3C124135
86:47:59 30:22:11
87:00:35 30135123
871C0135 3CI311*7
82:23:23 27:23:23
83:23:59 3C:03:35
82:57:35 30:05:23
81:05:59 28:21
G1.0000000000
SlCOOOOOOOOO
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOCOOOOOOOO
SE2500000000
SE2*00000000
SEIOOOOOOOOO
SE1000000000
SE*QOOOOOOQO
SE2000000000
SE3300000000
SE3100000000
SE3100000000
SE1lOOOOOOOO
SE1200000000
SEllOOOOOOOO
SEllOOOOOOOO
SE1800000000
SE1802000000
SE«10*000000
SE*lOOOOOOOO
SE* 103000000
SE*103000000
SE3000000000
SE3500000000
SE3600000000
SEUOOOOOOOO
SE3600000000
SE3600000000
SE*000000000
SE*00000C00C
SE*000000000
SE0200000000
SE0200000000
SE0700000000
SE0600000000
SE0700000000
SE020000000C
MAI*00000000
SE01Q0000000
SE0200000000
SE0600000000
SEO*OOODOOOO
SE 0300000000
SE0300000000
SEO*OCOOOOOO
SW20
SW20
SW3o
SW3o
SW35
SW35
SWH6
SW26
QLOOOQOOOOOO
GCOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOC
06 8
06 8
05
05
09
06
08
08
OS
05
05
05
05
06
06
09
09
09
09
07
08
OB
05
08 8
08 8
09
09
09
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
01
01
01
01
6
6
2
5
5
*
*
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
9
-------
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
WDC
MAP STATE
M LET CMNTY
1970 1960 EPA I EC
CENSUS CENSUS REG* CASE
st ca st ca iw study
Bawos
FIRST ¦
LAT LING
¦ SECOND
LAT L0NQ
"r
VO
2 6
r>
cfc
14
t
El
T
H
tr
14
j
14
z
H
F
14
F
14
F
14
r
14
F
H
Z
1«
V
14
F
I'-
!
ll
u
14
F
13
V
14
r
14
F
14
!
14
F
14
K
14
J
Cl
P
Cl
F
Cl
U
Cl
F
Cl
L
01
0
Cl
L
1
l
Cl
F
Cl
P
Cl
c
Cl
C2
A
C 4
Cb
c
C4
R
C 4
c
CS
r
C4
n
C5
s
Cb
K
C5
C5
A
05
C
C?>
J
C4
P
C4
F
Cb
K
C 4
C
I".
I*.
LA
LA
L>
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
L*
LA
Mt
wfc.
rt
me
me
Mt
ML
ME
ME
ft
Ml
Mfc
ft
MD
MD
MO
mc
MC
ML
MD
n
mc
ft
MD
ML
MC
KC
MC
UA PPUTC
P?PTl»
CAfT«3\
CATION
CA"-tKDN
IPEwIa
JEHTRSOV
JEFHRS^n
LAP 31/PCHf
9RH ANS
PLA,oE"t\tS
ST. !if*5\aK0
st- ^EK'-A^O
ST. CHARGES
ST the
ST. M»3Y
ST. fABY
ST. TA>1"ANY
ST. TA-MANY
TAKuIPah-)A
TAK^tPAMQA
TCK^:F.D9-»n,C
TrR«LB«>j\r
vE9::ILt5»:
VER'ULI'JS
CJ",.(.RLA\C
hAKCftCK
KNSx
KSlflX
L1NCJL\
SAGaCAhsc
SAGiEAwsc
*ALr.?
WASi
-------
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
WDC 1970 I960 EPA 1EC B0WIDS 0CEAN
IMP STATE CENSUS CENSUS REG- CASE FIRST SEC0ND : ESTUARINE REGISTER AREA REGX0N
M LET CMMTY ST C0 ST CB I»N STUDY LAT L0NG LAT L«NG FIRST LAST SUB
cs
f
PC
cjtr> A\\!ts
?*
wis
21
Clb
C3
SC
¦53: c i -."i 7
76:18:35
38:*7:5g
76:22:11
PAC*00000000
mao*oooooooo
03
7
C5
*
wr
ST. Y'j
St
-37
el
CIS
C3
^0
3s:i6:U
7fc:*9:»7
38:01**7
76:19:11
PAC*1*000000
mao*i*oooooo
03
7
C;
<
PC
5T• f .'WYs
?<•
;37
21
CIS
C3
OS
38:ni:
C~
CC
?8:jc:cc
7fc:»o:»7
38:17:59
76:27:35
MAC*00000000
MA0400000000
03
7
C5
r
rt
KSf T
?~
¦(.32
21
C2C
C?
CC
3R:07:ll
76:C5:23
37:53!11
75:56*59
PAC*00000000
MAO*OOOOOOOC
03
7
C5
A
PC
r?pf ^sft
r*
C39
?1
C.ZC
C3
3C
i8:ic:"7
7£:56:59
37:56:59
75:*6I*7
PAC*OOCOCOOO
PA0*00000000
03
7
C5
c
"L
TAL!«T
r*
Cs 1
21
C21
C3
no
38:^7:59
76:23:?3
38;30>CC
76:17:59
P»c*00000000
mao*oooooooo
03
7
Ct
A
MO
*IC'."ICt
?*
C*5
21
C23
r.3
CC
38:15:35
75:56:23
38:i5:oc
75:52:*7
PAC400000000
MAO*00000000
03
7
Co
*
PC
STF-)
2*
0*7
21
C2*
C3
oc
38:if.:cc
75:52:*7
37:57:35
76:o2:?3
PAC100000000
MA0201000000
03
6
C»
R
PD
BALTIMORE CITY
r*
blO
?1
CO
C 3
nc
39:11:59
76:30:cc
39:221*7
76:3c:oo
PAC4O00OC0O0
HA0400000000
03
7
C2
F
PA
tAK ,STABLE
rE
iCl
2?
cm
Cl
oc
*i:»l:59
7C!38:59
*i;3i:u
70:*1I59
NE3302000000
NE330*000000
02
9
C2
e
PA
MAR^.STAFLr
£b
CCl
2?
C^l
CI
sc
*1:19:11
7c:3i:*7
*i:3osoc
70:*1159
NE3COOOOOOOO
NE3203000000
02
9
C2
f
PA
*«IST6L
rt
uC5
2?
C03
d
oc
ti:37:H
7i:c7:n
*li30iOC
70:50:23
NE3306000000
NE3308000000
03
1
C2
F
-A
CJKf s
r5
£C7
?2
cct
ci
CC
41:31:»7
7c:58:11
*1:318*7
70:26:23
NE320*000000
NE3205000000
03
1
C2
F
PA
CJKFS
cb
CC7
2?
CC*
d
CC
*i:3i:«7
7c:58:ii
*i:3i:*7
70:26123
NE320*000000
NE3205000000
03
1
C2
PA
EGSlX
?s
wC9
?2
CC-5
Cl
CC
*2:5i:35
7c:*8:35
*2:*6J*7
7o:*7:59
NE2200000000
NE220000000C
02
7
C?
A
ma
ESSl *
2S
l;c9
22
C0&
Cl
00
"2:">2:li
7c:*9:ii
*2:51:35
70:*8135
NE2500000000
NE2500000000
02
7
C?
E
MA
ESSf *
?5
CC9
2?
CCb
Cl
30
»2:t6:*7
7c:*7:=9
*2.26.59
70:57:35
NE2202000000
NE2500000000
02
7
CJ
F
PA
NAKTCCKET
25
(.19
22
CIO
Cl
CC
tl:l*:23
7c:i9:*7
*i:i*:23
69:58:*7
NE3206C00000
NE3206000000
03
1
C2
F
PA
SAMlCKET
25
J19
22
C1C
Cl
rc
»i:23:23
7c:i9:*7
*1:23823
69:581*7
NE3206000000
NE3206000000
03
1
C2
F
PA
n.shf?l«
25
C21
22
ell
cl
CC
*2:18:35
7i:oo:35
*2:15:35
70:55:11
NE2601020000
NE2700000000
02
8
C2
F
PA
PLY-:«UTh
25
C23
22
C1?
d
oc
*2:19:*7
7c:55:11
*i:«9:ll
70:32:23
NE2601030000
NE3000000000
02
9
C2
F
PA
PLY"«'jTh
?5
wc3
22
cir
d
CC
*l:*3:li
7C!38:23
*1;37U1
70:50:23
NE330500COOO
NE3305000000
02
9
C?
F
PA
SjFFSL*
?5
i25
22
Cl3
Cl
20
*2:26:59
7C:57:35
*2:195*7
70:55:11
NE2600CD0C00
NE2601010100
02
8
22
11
ALCANA
26
LCI
23
CCl
C5
CC
**:3i:*7
83:*7:59
**:*2:35
83:53123
GtCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
V
MI
ALC«'iA
26
tci
23
C01
Cb
rs
**:*2:35
83:53:23
**;525ll
83:19:11
GUCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
0
"I
ALGER
26
;c3
23
C02
cs
oc
*6:»i:23
8b:52:*7
*6:26:59
86:37:11
GUCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
23
c
PI
algc
26
CC3
£3
C02
C5
00
*6:26:59
86:37:11
*6;3c:cc
87:05:59
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
22
r-
PI
allcgav
?6
£C5
23
C33
C5
OC
*2:*c:*7
86:12:35
*2:39:35
86:l*:23
SLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
22
c
11
ALL'GA\
26
CC5
23
C33
C5
00
*2:39:35
86:i*:23
*2:2*:35
86:17:23
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
22
E
PI
ALLF.GAS
26
;cs
23
CC3
C5
00
*2:*6:*7
86:11:59
*2i*0!*7
86:12:35
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
23
X
PI
Al.Fr \A
26
LC7
23
CO"
C5
OC
*5:o*:*7
83:23:59
*5:12:35
83:23:59
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
*
"I
AL^r'.A
26
SC7
23
CCl
C5
OC
*5:02:59
83:26:59
*5;o*:+7
83:23:59
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
Y
PI
alp.'na
26
CC7
23
C01
C5
OC
**:52:ii
83:i9:ii
*5:o2:59
83:26:59
GUCOCOOOCOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
?3
S
PI
ANT 5If
26
iC9
23
COb
CS
OC
*5:12:35
85:23:23
**:52:ii
85:28:11
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
2?
f
PI
ASE .AC
e6
Cll
23
CS6
C^
OC
*3:55:11
83:5»:35
**;io:*7
83:33:35
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
c
PI
BAKaQA
2*
il3
23
CC7
C5
00
*6:5*:35
88:02:59
*6:56:59
88;33:35
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
22
V
PI
BAY
26
wl7
23
CC9
C5
00
*3:35:59
83:*i:59
*3:38:59
83!*8:35
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
a
I
'I
SAY
26
il7
23
C09
CS
n, r»
' w
*3:38:59
83:*8:35
*3139135
83:52:ii
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
22
A
PI
?AY
26
CJ7
23
C39
C5
OC
*3:39:35
83:52;ii
*3;55:ii
83:5*:3b
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
2?
y
PI
3E*ZIE
26
C19
23
cic
C5
oo
»*:»6:«7
86:c*:*7
**'.30:35
86:15:35
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
22
ra
-I
jFRjIEv
26
>.21
23
Cll
C5
OC
*2:0g:23
86:28:*7
*2:02:23
86:31:*7
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
22
A
PI
3ER?IE*.
26
.21
23
oil
C5
OC
*2:02:23
86:3i:*7
*i:*6:*7
86:*7|59
SLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
2?
c
"I
bFR ^ !F».'
26
*.21
23
SlI
C5
OC
*2:15:35
86:22:*7
*2;o8:23
86:28:*7
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
£3
s
PI
Cw»:;lFvO J*
26
'.29
23
£15
C5
00
*5:2er:*7
85.to: 35
«5ilg:35
85:23;23
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
2?
V
PI
CmE i?Y3A-.
26
C31
23
Cl6
C5
30
*5:39:35
8*:26:59
*5:*o:ll
8*:29:23
GLCCOOOOOOOO GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
T
PI
C^E ifYr.A-,
26
-31
23
C16
C5
00
*5:*c:11
s«:29:?3
*5:*7:59
8*:*5:co
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
23
V
PI
C'-tE i»YG»v
26
C31
23
Jl6
C5
00
*5:»j:1l
87:i6:ii
*5:*o:*7
8*:26:59
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
3
2 3
c
PI
CHtr">C.A
26
C33
23
d7
C^
00
*6:31;ii
8*:17:59
*6: *6:*7
85:15 J 00
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
?3
J
"I
rtLTA
26
W«1
23
C21
C5
OC
*5:»7:23
87:C3:35
*5:32:23
87:17:23
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
23
u
"I
1ELTA
26
-»1
23
C21
CS
OC
*5:*3:*7
86:28:*7
*5;*i:59
86:S8:*7
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
a
e J
»
"I
t'.ElTA
26
;*i
23
C21
C5
00
*E:*l:59
87:58:*7
*5:*7:23
87:03:35
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
23
S
T
E^Pi-'T
26
J»7
23
C?«
C5
cc
*5:23:23
8«:55:*7
*5;22t*7
85:00:35
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
£3
T
"I
EPPET
£6
;»7
23
C2*
C5
r'*
*5:*7:59
«*:*5:cc
*5:23:23
8*:55:*7
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
-------
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
•VDC
MAP STATS
N0 LET CflUNTY
1970 1960
CENSUS CENSUS
ST C0 ST C0
EPA XEC
REG* CASE
10N STUDY
BflUNDS
FIRST
LAT L0NG
SEC0ND
LAT L0NG
*
z*
A
G36f.rlc
26
c 3
U27
C5
c c
46
•~6
47
85
?7
r
Ml
vcc 1* ic
tbi
T3
C27
C5
iife
4b
CC
83
23
5
^ I
r>~A\D
rfc
^55
?3
L 26
C*
OC
44
11
fib
2i
C
** I
26
cti
23
C31
CC
46
*6
59
8:
22
V
y I
HJfijV
wb3
23
03c1
C5
oc
43
"l
53
8£
22
*
Mf
23
G 35
?0
44
10
4;
S3
CC
V
m I
^69
23
w35
cc
44
?C
2^
S3
20
A
V J
26
:c3
23
C*2
C5
DC
4B
05
59
2"i
c
MI
;
MI
26
i»l
23
C73
C5
OC
45
12
35
83
22
V
HI
ST. CLAU
26
1*7
23
C7«»
C5
00
45
*1
23
82
22
V
MI
ST# CLA19
26
1*7
23
CM
C5
OC
43
CI
47
82
22
V
P*[
SA\ItAC
26
151
23
C76
C5
00
43
u
23
8c
23
MI
SCHOOLCRAFT
26
153
23
C77
C5
OC
45
58
47
8b
21
G
M J
SCH'^Lr^ArT
?6
153
23
C77
C5
OC
45
56
59
86
23
*
MI
SC^t»etC£?AF'r
26
353
23
C/7
C5
oc
45
56
59
86
2 Z
V
V] J
TUSr.fiLA
26
157
23
C79
C5
02
43
*5
35
83
22
c
MI
VAN
26
159
23
0«c
C5
00
4£
24
35
86
2?
2
aAY\L
r 6
163
23
0^2
C5
OC
<~2
0?
23
83
2?
Y
Mr I
*AY-,r
26
163
23
CS2
C5
00
42
w4
47
83
22
W
Ml
ft AY ,£
2.6
163
23
C32
C5
00
42
16
47
83
29
A
M\
?7
¦i31
2*
C16
C5
00
47
27
35
91
2^
A
lAK-r.
c7
v75
?M
C3o
C5
00
47
19
11
91
29
Q
**\
1 AKi
27
J75
24
C38
C5
CC
46
55
47
91
27
Q
v\
sr. lsjis
27
137
?h
C69
C5
OC
46
4C
47
92
13
s
ms
ka\';3C<
28
>5
PS
C23
C*»
00
3C
17
59
83
ii
V
MS
^*A\^^C<
25
25
023
OC
3C
15
CC
85
1*3
s
MS
2S
C^7
2?.
ZcH
C4*
00
3C
2C
59
B*
13
"S
JAC
-------
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
•HOC
MAP STATE
M LET COUNTY
1970 1960
CENSUS CENSUS
st ca st ce
EPA IEC
REG- CASE
1«N STUDY
B0UNDS
FIRST
LAT L0NG
SECMID
LAT LING
0CEAN
ESTUARlttE REGISTER AREA REGION
FIRST LAST SUB
13
S
?-s
wAC.%Sfi\
? s
C59
25
C3G
c*
00
3C:2C:59
8e:37:*7
30120:59
88:52:*7
SE**00000000
SE**00000000
09
5
13
t?
j*c-.:se*
?8
?b
030
c*
OC
3c:?2:*7
8f>!23:23
3c:i9:*7
88127:35
5E**00000000
SE**00000000
09
5
Cc?
A
KH
^5Cr;
33
-15
3C
CC8
Cl
00
*3:03:35
7c:*i:59
*2:52'.ll
70:*9:il
NE2000000000
NE2100000000
02
6
C 3
V
Ng
ATLaMJC
3*
CC1
31
C01
C2
00
39:3i:*7
7*:i9:ii
39sic:*7
7*:55lll
NE3609000000
NE36090*0000
03
*
C3
H
\ j
3e«?^N
3*
CC3
31
002
ca
01
»c:*o:ii
7«:ci:*7
*o:*6:*7
7*108159
NE3606030000
NE36060*0000
03
3
C*
!)
Sw
CA^t'fv
3*
0C7
31
C05
ce
oc
3s:5c;b9
75:i*:23
39:52:*7
75111159
NE3700000000
NE3701000000
03
5
<
Nw
C*^L MAY
3*
0C9
31
C35
C2
no
39:17:23
7*:3*:11
38:3i:*7
7*158111
NE3606010000
NlE36100*0000
03
*
c*
*
\w
CAPf: KAY
3*
CC3
31
CJ5
C2
30
38:3i;*7
7*:58:ii
39:101*7
7*l55l*7
NE3700000000
NE3700000000
03
*
E
k .
• *w
CJ^i-.EHLANO
3*
;u
31
C01
C2
30
39:io:*7
7i:55:ii
39:i9:*7
75:26123
NE3700000000
NE3700000000
03
5
C3
J
essr*
3*
:i3
31
C07
C2
00
*c:*o:ii
7*:i5:C0
»0i35159
7*113111
NE36060*0000
NE3606050000
03
3
C3
u
Nj
tssrx
3*
C13
31
C37
C2
00
*c:*6:*7
7*::8:59
*01*2:36
741C8123
NE3606C50000
NE3606050000
03
3
c-
C
Nj
2U^.,CESTF.5?
3*
D15
31
COR
C2
00
3S:*6:*7
7s:25:ii
39:50:59
7511*123
NE3700000000
NE3700000000
03
5
C3
u
No
*J03?K
3*
v.17
31
009
C2
01
»c:*?:35
74:08:23
*01*0111
7*:15100
NE3606030000
NE36060*0000
03
3
C3
1
v!C')LESCx
3*
;23
31
CIS
C2
01
*c:3o:Oc
7*:13:ii
*0126159
7*1131*7
NE3606060000
NE3606060000
03
3
Ci
J
NJ
^TC-)LESEk
3*
>,23
31
012
C2
01
*C:35:b9
7t:i3;*7
*0130100
7*112135
NE3606060000
NE3606060000
03
3
C3
<
M9Vi*yT*
3*
;as
31
C13
C?
01
*c:?f>:59
7*:i3:*7
*01071*7
7*102159
NE3606070000
NE3607020000
03
3
C3
«
N«J
SCEa\
3*
:29
31
CIS.
C2
00
*c:07:*7
7*:o2:59
391311*7
7*119111
NE3608000000
NE3608000000
03
*
C«
*
NJ
sAi_r*
3*
.33
31
C17
02
00
39:26:23
7s:3i:*7
391*61*7
75:25111
NE3700000000
NE37O0O0C0OO
03
5
C*
c
Nj
s*LrM
3*
vi3
31
017
02
00
39: i9:*7
75i26;2l
39126123
75:311*7
NE3700000000
NE370000000Q
03
5
Ci
1
Nw
J
3*
039
31
nao
C2
00
*0;35:b9
7*:13:11
*0130100
7*:13lll
NE36060*0000
NE3606050000
03
3
C2
V
'•iY
83®\X
36
CCS
33
C03
C2
00
*c:53:23
73:*6:ii
*01*7159
73153123
NE3512000000
NE3512000000
03
3
C3
0
NY
36
ccs
33
COS
C?
no
*0:53:59
73:55*. *7
*01*7159
73559123
NE3606030000
NE3fc06030000
03
3
C3
M
NY
CAVjfiA
36
Cl 1
33
C36
Cb
00
*3:25:u
76:36:35
*3120:23
761*2136
GlCOOOOOOOOO gloooooooooo
01
5
21
A?
NY
C^AtAuCjA
36
C13
33
CC7
C5
00
*2:3*:*7
75:09:35
*2U6:*7
791*5135
QLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
c«*
s
NY
E*lr
36
C29
33
CIS
C5
00
*3:ic:*7
79:c*:ii
*3100*35
78153159
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
21
A3
NY
fcRJf
36
02 9
33
015
C5
00
*3:oc:3S
78:53:59
*213*1*7
79109135
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
C3
NY
wEFrER$<5\
36
C*5
33
C23
C5
00
*3:5*:oc
076:15:36
**i2*:oc
075:5012*
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C3
9
\Y
jEFrrPs9\
36
C*5
33
023
C5
00
*3:58:11
76:08:59
*3 i *0!11
76111159
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
0?
•
NY
<1KDS
36
0*7
33
C2«
C2
1
*c:3*:*7
73:53:59
*0:37111
7*1011*7
NE3606000000
NE3606010000
03
3
0*
V
NY
r"*N-?0E
36
C55
33
028
C5
00
*3:16:n
77:30:cc
*3115136
77:32:23
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
c*
0
NY
?-?N^eE
36
oss
33
C28
C5
oo
*3:15:35
77:32:23
*31161*7
77135159
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C3
K
NY
^9N^?E
36
Cb5
33
C2S
C5
00
*3:16:*7
77:21:35
*3116111
77:30100
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
c*
T
NV
f^N^gF
36
Cb5
33
028
C5
00
*3:i6:*7
77:35:59
*31221*7
77:581*7
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C?
*
NY
NASSAU
36
C59
33
C30
C2
00
*c:56:23
73:31:11
*01*91*7
731*61*7
NE3512000000
NE351*000000
03
2
C2
ft
•^Y
NASSAU
36
059
33
C30
C2
01
*c: 36:35
73:2bi*7
*0135159
731*6111
NE3605000000
KE3605010000
03
2
C?
NY
ne* veex
36
C61
33
031
C2
01
*c:*9:ii
73:57:35
*01*1159
7*103135
NE3606
NE360603
03
3
C*
T
NY
MAOARA
36
C63
33
032
C5
00
*3:23:23
78:26:59
*31161*7
79103135
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
c*
s
NY
NIAGARA
36
C63
33
032
C5
*3:i6:*7
79:03:35
*31101*7
7910*111
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
c*
T
NY
s^lcans
36
C73
33
C37
C5
00
*3:22:*7
77:5s:*7
*3123123
78126159
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C3
w
NY
9S*F.5©
36
C75
33
036
C5
00
*3:28:*7
76:29:23
*3:25:11
76136135
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C3
<5
NY
9S^cG£
36
C75
33
038
C5
00
*3:*c:ii
7t:ii:59
*31281*7
76129123
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C2
•
NY
CJErNS
36
cei
33
Cl
C2
01
*c:35:59
73:*6:*7
*013*111
73153159
NE3606010000
NE3606010000
03
3
C?
«»
NV
CjEfNS
36
cei
33
0*1
C2
00
*c:*9:H
73:*7:£3
*0j**i23
73157135
NE3512000000
NE351201000C
03
3
Ci
!
NY
36
C85
33
0*3
C2
01
*c:2s:*7
7*:i5:co
*0:281*7
7*IC2159
NE3606
NE3606
03
3
C3
T
NY
RICh^P* ?
36
;es
33
C«3
C2
01
*c:37:*7
7*:i5:co
*0:371*7
7*102159
NE3606
NE3606
03
3
cs
S
NY
ST uAuKEnCC
36
CS9
33
C«5
C5
OC
**:**:2*
075:26:2*
*5 iOOlOC
07*15*136
gl
GL
01
6
03
t?
NY
st i>W*E\CF.
16
C*9
33
0*b
Cb
00
**:*c:l?
07t:57:12
**:**i2*
075126:2*
SL
GL
01
6
C3
r
NV
ST tA^VENCr.
36
C89
33
C*b
Cb
00
**:2*:cc
075:50:2*
**1*0112
075:57112
GL
GL
01
6
CP
e
NY
Surreu<
36
1C3
33
05?
C2
00
*i:c*:u
7i:53:?3
*0:551*7
73:31:11
NE3515000000
NE3519000000
03
2
C2
5
NY
Sw»Fp^L<
36
1C3
33
Cbc
C2
OC
*i:o*:li
71:53:23
*0136135
73125111
NE3601000000
NE3605000000
03
2
C3
K
NV
* AY\fc
36
117
33
Cb9
C5
oc
*3:2c:?3
76!*2:35
*3(161*7
77121135
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
5
C2
K
NV
aESTCKSTEP
36
119
33
C6C
C2
00
*1 :oc:cc
73:38:59
*0153123
731*6111
NE3512000000 NE3512000000
03
2
C3
c
NV
*CSTCHfSTt
-------
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
•HOC 1970 1940 EPA 1EC BOUNDS OCEAN
MAP STATE CENSUS CENSUS RES* CASE FIRST SEOND ESTUARINE RE3ISTER AREA RE SI CM
m LET COUNTY ST CO ST CO ION STUDY LAT L0N8 LAT LONG FIRST LAST SUB
Cfc
KC
bEfirir
37
CIS
30
008
C*
00
35:56:11
76:01:59
36;00l35
76:03:07
MAC501050000
1A0501050000
03
9
C?
A
*c
ERUrSMCK
37
CIS
30
ClC
C*
30
33:53:59
7«:oo:co
33:51:35
78:32)59
MAC900000000
MA0900000000
00
5
Cfc
s
KC
BRL\SkIC<
37
C 19
30
ClC,
ro
co
33:55:11
77:56:59
33:53:53
78:00:00
MA0905000000
MA0905000000
00
5
Cb
M
NC
CAK-5f>;
3'
C29
30
015
c*
00
36:08:23
75:51:35
36i09!35
76:ci:o7
MA0501050000
MA0501050000
03
9
Cfc
J
\C
CARTFRET
37
;3i
3o
016
C*
CO
35:o7;ii
76:30:co
30:07:59
76:01:59
MACSOIOOOOOO
MA0501000000
00
1
Cb
\
KC
CARTfRET
37
C31
30
C16
CO
10
3o:o7:59
7t:*3:n
30)38:59
77:05:59
MAC600000000
MA0601000000
00
1
cs
r
KC
CARTERET
37
w31
30
C16
c*
00
30:07:59
76:01:59
30:07:59
76:03:11
MAC501Q20000
HA0501020000
00
1
C6
P
KC
CH6»AK
37
001
30
021
c*
oc
36: co:07
76:23:59
36;o2i23
76:oi:23
MA0501050000
MA0501050000
03
9
Cfc
f
NC
CRAvEK
37
009
30
C25
c*
oc
35:09:36
C76:57;c0
3o;58:12
076:001*8
MAC50102
MA050102
03
9
Cfc
1-
NC
CURatTUC*
37
053
30
Cc7
c*
00
36:3o:07
7£:52:o7
36)08523
75:51)35
MAC500000000
MA0500000000
03
8
Cfc
M
NC
CARf
37
£.55
30
p2B
c*
30
36:15:CC
75:06:07
35:o&:*7
75:3o:oo
MA0501050000
MA0501000000
03
9
cfc
w
NC
CARE
37
055
30
028
c*
00
35:06:07
7E:3o:co
35)lo:*7
75:03)11
MAC501000000
HA0501000000
03
9
Cfc
K
KC
t-YO(.
37
095
10
008
CO
30
35:33:35
75:51:35
35:31U1
76:35:23
MACSOjOOOOOO
MA0501000000
03
9
Cfc
J
NC
HYDE
37
095
30
COS
c*
ac
35:33:3=
75:51:35
35:31111
76:35:23
MAC5010*0000
MA0501000000
03
9
C6
K
NC
NE» HA\i9vFR
37
129
30
C65
c*
30
3o:i6:o7
77:03:07
30:01:11
77:53)59
MAC800000000
MA0800000000
00
0
Ofc
s
NC
NE» "ANS-yER
37
129
30
C65
C*
30
3o:oj:ii
77:53559
33:55! 11
77:56159
MAC905000000
MA0905000000
00
0
Cfc
\
NC
9NSl9'*
37
133
30
C67
c*
00
30:38:59
77:05:59
30:25:07
77:3i:o7
MAC701000000
MA0801000000
0*
2
Cfc
J
NC
PANICS
37
137
30
C69
c*
30
35:i9:ii
76:37:n
35;07S11
76:30)00
MAC501000000
MA0501000000
03
9
Cfc
t*
NC
PA^uIC9
37
137
30
069
co
00
35:03:36
076:3*:*8
35:09:36
076:57:00
MA050102
MA050102
03
9
Cfc
M
NC
PASCLBT Ak'K
37
139
30
C7Q
c*
OC
36:09:35
76:oi:*7
36:o7:u
76:io:*7
MAC501050000
MA0501050000
03
9
C6
K
KC
pekber
37
101
30
071
c*
oc
30:25:07
77:31:07
30:16:07
77:03:07
MAC800000000
HA0800000000
0*
3
Cfc
U
KC
PFRcuI^AmS
37
103
30
C72
c*
00
36:07:11
76:10507
36100:07
76:23:59
MAC501C50000
MA0501050000
03
9
Co
H
KC
TYRsELL
37
177
30
C*9
CO
CO
36:02:23
76:35:59
35:58:11
76:21)35
MA0501Q50000
MA0501050000
03
9
06
M
NC
kiASMlK(?T(jK
37
187
30
C90
c*
00
36:02:23
76:23:59
35:59:23
76:35:59
MAC501050000
HA0501050000
03
9
21
AA
0*
ASHTABULA
39
CC7
36
coo
C5
00
01:58:07
ac:3i:o7
01:52:11
81:00)00
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
£1
AA
Sb
CJYAH6GA
39
U35
36
CIS
c5
30
»i:38:59
8i:3c:cc
01:33:35
815*1559
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
2i
Y
BH
CUYAHOGA
39
C35
36
018
C5
oc
*i:3c:35
81:01:59
01:30:0c
8l:58:o7
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
22
AK
9t-
ERIE
39
C03
36
022
C5
00
*1:25:07
82:35:59
01:29:23
82:01)59
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
21
V
flh
ERIE
39
0*3
36
022
C5
00
*i:?6:23
82:22:07
01)25:07
82:35159
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
21
AA
3H
1.AKE
39
065
36
003
C5
30
*1552:11
si:oc:co
*1:38:59
81:30100
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
21
V
9*
L9RAIK
39
093
36
007
cs
00
*i:30:cc
8i:58:o7
*1)26)23
A2:22:o7
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
22
AT
st-
LJCaS
39
095
36
008
C5
00
01:03:11
83:20:59
*1)06:11
83:23)59
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
0
22
AJ
ew
LuCaS
39
C95
36
COS
cs
00
*1:37:11
83:09:35
01:03:11
83:20:59
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
22
AJ
9*
PTT'-WA
39
123
36
C62
C5
00
*1:29:23
82:01:59
*1:37:11
83:09:35
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
*
22
AK
en
s*ndusky
39
1*3
36
C72
C5
CO
*1:39:36
C83:02!2O
*1:38:2*
082:52)08
GL
GL
01
*
70
z
9R
CLATSGP
*1
CC7
38
ooo
10
06
*6:09:35
120:01:11
*6:10:23
120:01:11
NWC700000000
NW0700000000
13
5
7*
AA
OR
CLArSPP
-------
TABLE A-l
>
I
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
woe
MAP STATE
|» LET CMMTY
1970 I 960 EPA IEC
CCMSUS CENSUS BEG- CASE FIRST
ST C* ST ca I0N STUDY LAT L0NG
B0UNDS
•CEAN
SECiMD
LAT L0NG
ESTUAR1NE
FIRST
REGISTER AREA REGI«»
LAST SUB
21 4*
0* C
02
ca
o?
CH
C2
CS
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
07
07
07
37
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
b?
51
52
52
52 AC
55 J
5b
55
55
51
51
51
5? ,
52
51
55
S5
55
55
55
55
SS
5?
52
52 AC
5a *c
55 A
55 j
51 C
52 AC
5? AC
PA E f.JfCES
Ty KjEcEr.
TX hjErrFS
T> pRAl Gf
TX RE^filO
Tx REF.,r,!?«
4? C*9
1C1
44 CCl
44 CC3
44 UC5
44 -C7
44 CC9
<.5 C13
4
35 c51
tC C-l
»C C.22
»C 1,03
*C COt
»c co&
*1
*1
~ 1
C5 OC
C3 OC
CS7
C07
CIO
41 ClC
41 ClC
41 ClO
41 CIO
41
41
Cl
cl
cl
Cl
cl
C4
nc
oc
oc
OC
oc
oc
C* oo
c 4 oc
C"» 02
C4 02
C* 0?
C4 02
ClC
- _ ClC
41 C15
4i ei5
*1 C22
*1 C22
41 C22
*1 C26
41 C26
44 004
44 020
44 C2C
44 c20
44 C29
44 031
44 031
44 C31
44 C31
44 C36
44 OS*
44
44
44
44
44 131
44 131
44
44
44
C4
C*
C*
C4
02
00
00
00
C4 00
C*
c*
03
00
C* oc
C4 00
C6 00
C6
C&
101
120
120
123
C6 00
C6 00
06 00
C6 00
C6
C6
C6
C6
C6
C^
137
137
137
44 137
44 137
44 161
44 161
44 161
44 178
44 178
44 178
44 1*1
44 196
44 196
oo
00
oo
00
oo
oo
C6 OC
C6 00
C6 00
C6 00
C«
C6
C°
CO
00
oc
c6 00
C6 00
C& 30
C6 00
C6 00
C6 CO
C6 OC
C6 CO
C6 OC
C6 00
C& 00
"ȣ: 10:
4i:4b:
41 I 37 J
41:46:
*~ 1: 3C:
32107!
32!3C!
33iC6:
33:05:
33:05:
32:44;
32:44;
32!*5:
32130:
32:28
32:28
33:10
33:34
33:25
33:50
33:51
?8;C4
29:04
78:59
28:53
28:23
26:24
26:24
26:22
25:58
29:33
29:32
29:4C
28:*3
28:42
29:11
27:16
27:16
27:27
27:28
27:33
27:34
27:34
?8:4i
?8;5i:
28:46:
27:59:
27;49}
27:55:
29:58:
28:U:
28:19:
47
47
47
35
; 11
; 47
: cc
:ii
cc
35
23
23
123
;23
:3b
: cc
:*7
: 11
:*7
:47
*.47
:59
:3b
11
:47
:23
59
;59
:35
: 35
; 47
:»7
:35
:59
:i?
-.12
:23
:47
:*7
35
11
35
47
47
23
35
47
23
47
11
46
59
It
8C:
75:
7i:
7i:
7c:
71
71:
8c:
8C:
79:
79:
79:
79".
79:
7s:
C4:47
ii;59
20!59
22/47
50:23
21S35
07:ii
55:«7
30 • CO
17:23
19:47
19:47
53:23
,535 23
:5o:59
!30:00
:20:59
:2b:47
:lli59
:co;cc
:i4:23
:5&:59
:32:59
:5o:s9
:06¦35
:i5:cc
:20159
122:47
:13U1
:13:1l
:24:35
uom
•.22:47
23:23
:Sb:48
37;i2
:34-.l2
:5i:35
•.22:47
:22:47
:33:3s
:46:ii
:28:47
:i6:i7
: 16:47
:se> :£3
:26:23
:33:35
:05:E9
07 • 47
C3-.35
46148
01:47
47:59
8c:
8C
8C
79
79
79
78
78
96
95
95
95
96
97
97
97
97
94
94
094
096
096
9
97
97
97
97
97
97
97
9b
95
95
97
97:
97:
093:
97:
96:
41 ;58 '• *7
39;50!59
41;3S!59
41i 41:59
41;3J!0C
41;46111
41:20S23
32:02•59
32:07*11
33:05:23
32:45!35
32:4^:35
32 »30•00
32130*00
32:4*123
32:28:17
32:28:11
32:30:0c
33!06!35
33!E5!»7
33;10!17
33:31i*7
33i50:59
27J50S59
28i59lH3
28:53*59
28;51«35
28;04:11
25:58:17
25158H7
26:23:59
25157135
29132*59
29:011*7
29:32:21
28; 13'.18
28:43:12
29:33:35
26*,30:0C
26:3o:oc
27:is:oc
27:26123
27:27:35
27:16 * 17
27:16*17
28:10!11
28:16:17
28:23:59
27:52:17
27:3*:17
27:34:17
29;57:0C
28:05:59
28:25:11
B0131S17
75:11123
71; 16:11
71:3c:co
71:07:11
71:22'*47
71:53:59
80:49:47
80:55147
79:19:47
79:50159
79150159
80:30100
80:30100
79:53:23
80:20159
80:25s47
80130100
79:17123
79111123
79111159
79:00:00
78:56:59
97:01117
95:15100
95120159
95126123
96150159
97:10:11
97110111
97:23123
97:08:23
94:23123
95106:35
O9s:oo:oo
096:39136
096137112
94122117
97:17123
97:17123
97:37117
97:16117
97:33135
97:221*7
97:22117
96:Cl.'*7
95133135
96:22117
97:3i:11
97116117
97116147
093:51136
97:16:11
97117159
GLOOOOOOOOOO
NE3700000000
NE3401000000
NE3105000000
NE31Q0000000
SE3401020000
NE3101000000
MA1100000000
MA1300000000
HA1000000000
MA 1001000000
HA110100000Q
MA1201000000
MAI102000000
WA1102000000
MA1200000000
MA1200000000
MA1200000000
MA1003000000
MA1000000000
MA 1004000000
MA0900000000
MA0900000000
SCC200000000
SCC600000000
SCC500000000
SCC500000000
SC0200000000
sccioooooooo
sccioeoocooo
sccioaoooooo
sccioooooooo
SC0700000000
Sec700000000
SCC70S
SCC1020V
SCC10201
SCCSOOOOOOOO
SCC102000000
SCCIOOOOOOOO
scctozoooooo
SCC102000000
SCC102000000
SCC102000000
sccioooooooo
scc*otcooooo
SCC500000000
SCCIOOOOOOOO
SCC201000000
SC0201000000
SCO100000000
SC0901
SC0202010000
SCC102000000
GLOOOOOOOOOO
NE3701000000
NE3101020000
^£3405000000
NE3400000000
NE3401020000
NE3401000000
MAiMOOOOOOOO
MA1300000000
MAlOOOOOOOOO
MAlOOJOOCOOO
MAl 10*000000
MA120JOOOOOO
MA1103010000
MA1103010000
MA 1200000000
MAI200000000
MA1200000000
MA1003000000
MA1004000000
MA1004000000
MA0900000000
MA0900000000
SC0200000000
SC06000Q000Q
SC060000000Q
SC0500000000
SC0300000000
SC0100000000
SC0102000000
SC0102000000
SC010000000Q
SC0800000000
SC0700000000
SC0702
SC0402Q1
SCOlOSOl
SC0900000000
SC0102000000
SCO100000000
SC0102000000
SCOl02000000
SC0102000000
SC0102000000
SC010000000Q
SCO*0100000c
SC0500000000
SC0500000000
SC020100000Q
SC020J000000
SCO100000000
SC0901
SC0202010000
SC0402000000
01
03
03
03
03
03
03
05
05
05
05
05 1
05 1
05
05
05
0*
01
0*
01
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
2
2
7
7
7
6
8
6
9
9
9
9
5
5
5
7
7
1
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-------
TABLE A-1
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
woe 1970 I960 EPA 1EC BBUNDS BCEAN
MAP STATE CEMSUS CENSUS MS- CASE FIRST SECBND ESTUARINE REGISTER AREA RE81W
MB LET COUNTY ST CS ST CB IBM STUDY LAT LBNG LAT LBNG FIRST LAST SUB
52
AC
n
SAN PAT^jC!^
»?
»C9
*4
t'Cb
C6
CC
?7
54
35
97
C8
59
27:52:47
97
3i:u
SC0201000000
SC0201000000
10
8
55
G
TX
.^ILlACv
49
•»S9
44
?4b
C6
30
26
3C
CC
97
17
? 3
26;?4!35
97
13: ii
SCC102000000
SC0102000000
10
9
55
J
T*
-IIlACv
48
¦»t>9
44
24b
C6
oc
26
3C
CC
97
17
23
26:24:35
97
13:11
SCC100000000
SCOlOOOOOOOO
10
9
C5
A
VA
ACC*?*AC*
51
CC1
*7
031
C3
7C
37
34
47
75
56
59
37;55:47
75
56:59
MAC400000000
»-jMUE«UANC;
bl
133
47
C6b
C3
oo
37
S3
23
76
13
11
38:o2:59
76
31:11
MAC414000000
MA0414000000
03
7
0*
A
VA
NO«Thu^?ERLAVw
51
133
47
C65
C3
00
37
09
35
75
57
35
37:34:47
75
56:59
MAC400000000
HA0400000000
03
7
Cb
L
VA
PRINCE r,EftWGE
51
1*9
47
073
C3
OC
37
19
1?
077
16
48
37:13148
076
53)24
HAC40305
HA040305
03
7
C5
VA
PSI^Ct * ILL I AM
51
153
47
C74
C3
CC
38
3C
cc
77
17
59
38:24!35
77
14;23
MAC414000000
MA0414000000
03
7
C5
K
V A
STAfF«fc£
51
179
47
C37
C3
50
38
24
35
77
14
23
38:21:35
77
17)23
MAC414000000
MA0414000000
03
7
C5
U
VA
SJW^Y
51
181
47
CSS
C3
OC
37
13
48
076
53
24
37:09:36
076)39)36
MAC40305
MA040305
03
7
05
VA
rtESTMfRElAND
51
193
47
C93
C3
OC
38
16
47
77
CO
CC
38:02159
76
31111
MAC414COOOOO
HA0414000000
03
7
C 5
A
VA
V^Kk
51
199
47
C96
C3
CC
37
15
CC
76
23
59
37:07!11
76
17123
MAC407000000
HA0407000000
03
7
Ce
H
VA
c^EsArc A*E
51
550
47
101
C3
00
36
57
CC
C76
23
J>4
36158:48
076
16132
MAC403
MA0403
03
7
C5
L
VA
^AMr^eK
51
t50
47
111
C3
00
37
07
12
C76
17
24
36:54:48
076
24;oO
MAC4
HA0403
03
7
C5
U
VA
Sfc»P6RT \E*S
51
/CO
47
116
C3
OC
36
54
48
C76
24
CO
37:09:36
076
39)36
MAC403
HA040305
03
7
ce
u
VA
KORf 8L<
51
710
47
117
C3
OC
36
58
48
76
16
32
36:55:47
76
C9I18
MAC403000000
MA0403000000
03
7
C6
VA
P6R1SHAJTM
51
740
*7
120
C3
OC
36
5C
24
076
22
48
36:46:48
076
19:12
MAC40303
MA040303
03
7
C6
h
VA
VlR(-tMA BEACh
51
bio
47
127
C3
OC
36
55
48
076
C9
18
36:34:47
75
52:47
MA0500000000
MA0500000000
03
8
7b
A
WA
CLALLAM
53
CC9
48
COS
10
06
~ 8
23
23
124
44
23
*7:53:59
124
38)59
N4C900000000
NW0900000000
13
9
75
I
V»A
claua-
53
CC9
48
C05
10
00
48
19
47
122
57
35
48:14:23
123
28)47
NwlOOOOOOOOO
NWlOOOOOOOOO
13
9
75
A
«A
CLaLL**'
53
i.C9
48
COb
10
00
*8
14
23
123
28
47
48,*3o:OC
124
45i00
NWlOOOOOOOOO
NWlOOOOOOOOO
13
9
75
1
r.A
Clallam
53
0C9
48
COb
10
OC
48
14
23
123
28
47
48:19:48
122
59)30
NM1C02
NM1002
13
9
75
A
W.A
GRAyS MARbOR
53
027
4E
C14
10
06
47
32
59
124
21
35
46:47:23
124
05)59
NW0800000000
NW090000000C
13
7
75
1
r.A
ISLAND
53
C29
48
Clb
10
1C
48
24
36
122
16
48
48)24:36
122
56)48
N*1002
NW1002
14
6
7b
T
kA
ISLAND
53
029
*e
Clb
10
OC
47
5C
24
122
16
48
47:50524
122
56)48
NW1002
HUlOOZ
14
6
7b
A
V.A
^FFrERS5\
53
C31
48
C16
10
06
47
53
59
124
38
59
47:32:59
124
21)35
NWC900C00000
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o\
O
7L
2
13
8
75
!
WA
jfFrtRSPN
53
031
48
C16
10
OC
*8
19
48
122
59
3C
47:36:36
122
56124
NW1002
NW1002
13
8
75
I
A A
KING
53
C33
48
C17
10
OC
*7
19
12
122
24
36
47)46:48
122:23!24
NM1002
NWI002
14
4
7b
I
WA
kITsAP
53
035
48
Cle
10
00
47
24
OC
122
37
48
47;24»0C
122
37148
N*1002
NW1002
14
1
7b
!
WA
KITSAP
53
C35
48
CIS
10
00
47
59
24
123
C2
24
47:59:24
123
02124
NW1002
NW1002
14
1
75
!
WA
MASnN
53
0*5
48
C23
10
00
47
36
36
122
b6
24
47:05:24
123
06)00
Nm1002
NW1002
14
2
7b
A
WA
PACiric
53
C49
48
C25
10
06
46
47
23
124
Cb
59
46;17:59
124
C4I11
NWC800000000
MM0800000000
13
6
75
T
WA
f'lEkCE
53
Cbl
48
027
10
00
47
06
CC
122
41
24
47:19!12
122
24! 36
NW1002
NW1002
14
3
75
I
WA
fcAN j'jAN
53
055
48
C28
10
00
48
50
24
122
40
48
48;5o:24
123
15)36
NW1C01
NW1001
14
8
75
T
WA
SAN JUAN
53
w55
4 8
C28
*2
00
48
16
48
122
4C
48
48:16:48
123
15136
NW1001
NW1001
1*
8
75
f
WA
S*A;*,!T
c 3
-57
48
C29
10
00
48
22
12
122
28
48
48)38:24
122
28)48
KMIC02
NW1002
14
7
75
WA
3
-------
~
I
I—*
TABLE A-l
CROSS REFERENCE LIST
CVDC
MAP STATE
W LET CCUNTY
—*
7b
WA
75
c
*A
75
T
MA
SN9h«M!S-<
75
!
tr< A
tho-?st?n
75
!
WA
WMATCOK
7b
u
WA
WHATCGM
75
!
WA
rfHATCP*
27
C
fc'I
ASIANS
27
A
wi
as^la^d
?7
A
W!
Bayfield
23
p
wi
23
\
Wt
b«e/N
23
WI
5**1 *
23
R
WI
O^ftR
27
A
«l
DOUGLAS
27
c
wI
26
r.
*!
KEMSkA
23
r
WI
KFWAUNF.C
26
A
k 1
^AK'TTew^C
23
R
WI
-A\|TftkOC
23
L
WI
^ARlNETTfc
23
K
WI
M AR J NT.TTE
26
c
w 1
*IL.;AU.AU*EE
23
\
WI
eC^MTP
23
W
»1
BCONTfi
26
0
WI
S7AuKEF
2ft
C
w J
RAC^E
26
a
WI
SWt'jeYGANi
26
A
WI
SHEbeYGAN
1970 I960 EPA IEC B0UNDS SCEAM
CENSUS CENSUS REG- CASE FIRST SEC0ND ESTUARINE REGISTER AREA REGION
st ca st ca ibn study lat lbng lat lsng first last sub
b3
w61
4R
C31
10
oc
<<8:03
cc
122:li:2*
*8!161*8
122:22112
NW1C02
NW1002
1*
5
53
C61
*ft
C31
10
00
*8icc
3fc
IPellli?*
48;03!0c
122UU2*
NM1C02
NW1002
1*
5
53
J6I
C31
10
00
*8
122123:2*
*8:oo:36
12211112*
NM1C02
NM1002
1*
5
53
067
<~*
034
10
00
*7:C5
24
1231061CC
*7:0610C
1221*112*
NW1C02
NW1002
14
2
53
C73
*»8
037
10
00
*8:38
24
122:28:48
*7:*6i*8
12213*112
M1002
NW1002
1*
9
53
073
4g
C37
10
00
47:46
*8
122:3*:12
*7:*9i*8
1221*3112
NW1002
NW1002
14
9
53
073
4fi
C37
10
00
*7:49
4<<
122:43;12
49:oo:oc
1221*2112
NM1002
NW1002
14
9
55
CC3
50
00c
05
00
*6: 35
59
9c:34:47
46S*0i*7
901*0111
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
55
CC3
50
C02
05
10
*6:*C
47
9c:*o:n
*7:oosoc
901*7:59
gloooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
55.
uC7
5C
004
C5
00
*7:oc
CC
9c:47:=9
teles'*?
9113*1*7
gl0000000000
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
*5
«jC9
50
COj
C5
00
a*: 3h
59
87156159
*4138:59
87:*s:co
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
0C9
5C
005
05
00
44 s *0
<.7
87:58:47
44:32:59
87:58:n
GLOCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
wC9
5C
C05
C*
00
«:3?
59
87:58:ii
44:32159
87:56159
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
029
5C
015
C*
00
44:4c
47
87:4i:59
*5126123
8*1*7159
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GUOOOOOOOOOQ
01
2
55
C31
5C
C16
C5
00
*6:46
47
91: 3<»: 47
*61*01*7
92:17123
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
55
-51
5C
C2e
C5
00
45:56
59
8fc:ib:co
*6:35:59
90:3*1*7
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
1
55
C59
5C
030
C5
* r>
*2:?8
47
87:47:59
*2I3010C
87:*8135
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
061
5C
031
C5
A n
V \J
**:3a
59
87:45:co
**;*0!*7
871*1159
GLCCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
o/l
5C
036
c*
oc
"•3:53
59
87:43:11
*3:581*7
871*1159
glcooooooooo
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
-71
5C
C36
C5
00
**: 19
11
87:21:35
*3:53:59
87:*3:11
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
075
5C
C36
0*
oc
*4:58
47
87:37:ii
*4:57!35
87:*5(CO
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
j75
5C
038
0?
00
*5:05
23
87:35:59
*41581*7
87137111
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
0/9
5C
0*1
05
00
*2:*d
47
87:48:35
*3100135
87153123
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
C79
5C
0*1
05
no
*3:cc
35
87:53:23
*31101*7
87:53123
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GUOOOOOOOOOQ
01
2
55
ca3
5C
0*3
05
oc
** :5i
35
87:5C:23
**1401*7
87:581*7
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
083
5C
C*3
05
30
ft :57
35
87:*5;GO
**151135
87:50123
GLOOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
089
5C
0*6
05
00
*311C
47
87:53:23
*3132123
871*7159
GLOCOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
1C1
5C
052
05
CO
42:3c
CO
87:48:35
*21491*7
871*8135
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
117
5C
C60
C5
00
*3:32
?3
87:47:59
43:34 47
871*7123
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
55
117
5C
C60
05
30
~ 3:3*
47
87:47:23
*3:53159
87:*3111
GLCOOOOOOOOO
GLOOOOOOOOOO
01
2
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REG 10N
STATE
C0UNTY
I0N
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
01
003
04
00
09
4
AL
BALDWIN
01
097
04
00
09
4
AL
M0BILE
06
001
09
05
12
5
CA
ALAMEDA
06
013
09
05
12
6
CA
C0NTRA C0STA
06
015
09
00
13
1
CA
DEL N0RTE
06
023
09
00
13
1
CA
HUMB0LDT
06
037
09
00
1 1
3
CA
L0S ANGELES
06
041
09
05
12
7
CA
MARIN
06
045
09
00
12
9
CA
MEND0CIN0
06
053
09
00
12
2
CA
M0NTEREY
06
055
09
05
12
6
CA
NAPA
06
059
09
00
1 1
2
CA
0RANGE
06
073
09
00
1 1
1
CA
SAN D1EG0
06
075
09
05
12
4
CA
SAN FRANCISC0
06
079
09
00
12
1
CA
SAN LUIS 0B1SP0
06
081
09
05
12
4
CA
SAN MATE0
06
083
09
00
1 1
5
CA
SANTA BARBARA
06
085
09
05
12
5
CA
SANTA CLARA
06
087
09
00
12
3
CA
SANTA CRUZ
06
095
09
05
12
6
CA
S0LAN0
06
097
09
05
12
8
CA
S0N0MA
06
1 1 1
09
00
1 1
4
CA
VENTURA
09
001
01
00
03
2
CT
FAIRFIELD
09
007
01
00
03
2
CT
MIDDLESEX
09
009
01
00
03
2
CT
NEW HAVEN
09
01 1
01
00
03
2
CT
NEV L0ND0N
10
001
03
00
03
5
DE
KENT
10
003
03
00
03
5
DE
NEW CASTLE
10
005
03
00
03
6
DE
SUSSEX
11
001
03
00
03
7
DC
VASHINGT0N DC
12
005
04
00
09
1
FL
BAY
12
009
04
00
06
1
FL
BREVARD
12
Oil
04
00
06
6
FL
BR0VARD
12
015
04
00
08
2
FL
CHARL0TTE
12
017
04
00
08
6
FL
CITRUS
12
019
04
00
05
7
FL
CLAY
12
021
04
00
08
1
FL
C0LL1ER
12
025
04
03
06
7
FL
DADE
12
029
04
00
08
7
FL
DIXIE
A-17
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
I0N
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
12
031
04
00
05
6
FL
DUVAL
12
033
04
04
09
3
FL
ESCAMBIA
12
035
04
00
05
8
FL
FLAGLER
12
037
04
00
08
9
FL
FRANKLIN
12
045
04
00
09
1
FL
GULF
12
053
04
00
08
5
FL
HERNAND0
12
057
04
00
08
4
FL
HILLSB0R0UGH
12
061
04
00
06
2
FL
INDIAN RIVER
12
065
04
00
08
8
FL
JEFFERS0N
12
071
04
00
08
2
FL
LEE
12
075
04
00
08
6
FL
LEVY
12
081
04
00
08
4
FL
MANATEE
12
085
04
00
06
4
FL
MARTIN
12
087
04
00
06
8
FL
M0NR0E
12
089
04
00
05
6
FL
NASSAU
12
091
04
00
09
2
FL
0KAL00SA
12
099
04
00
06
5
FL
PALM BEACH
12
101
04
00
08
5
FL
PASC0
12
103
04
00
08
4
FL
PINELLAS
12
107
04
00
05
7
FL
PUTNAM
12
109
04
00
05
7
FL
ST. J0HNS
12
111
04
00
06
3
FL
ST. LUCIE
12
113
04
04
09
3
FL
SANTA R0SA
12
115
04
00
07
3
FL
SARAS0TA
12
123
04
00
08
7
FL
TAYL0R
12
127
04
00
05
9
FL
V0LUSIA
12
129
04
00
08
8
FL
VAKULLA
12
131
04
00
09
2
FL
VALT0N
13
029
04
00
05
3
GA
BRYAN
13
039
04
00
05
5
GA
CAMDEN
13
051
04
00
05
3
GA
CHATHAM
13
127
04
00
05
4
GA
GLYNN
13
179
04
00
05
4
GA
LIBERTY
13
191
04
00
05
4
GA
MCINT0SH
15
001
09
00
18
1
HI
HAWAII
15
003
09
00
18
3
HI
H0N0LULU
15
007
09
00
18
4
HI
KAUAI
15
009
09
00
18
2
HI
MAUI
17
031
05
00
01
2
IL
C00K
17
097
05
00
01
2
1L
LAKE
A-18
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
ION
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
18
089
05
00
01
2
IN
LAKE
18
091
05
00
01
2
IN
LA P0RTE
18
127
05
00
01
2
IN
P0RTER
22
023
06
00
10
3
LA
CAMER0N
22
045
06
00
10
2
LA
IBERIA
22
051
06
00
10
1
LA
JEFFERS0N
22
057
06
00
10
1
LA
LAF0URCHE
22
071
06
00
09
7
LA
0RLEANS
22
075
06
00
09
9
LA
PLAQUEMINES
22
087
06
00
09
8
LA
ST. BERNARD
22
089
06
00
09
7
LA
ST. CHARLES
22
095
06
00
09
7
LA
ST J0HN THE BAPTIST
22
101
06
00
10
2
LA
ST. MARY
22
103
06
00
09
7
LA
ST. TAMMANY
22
105
06
00
09
7
LA
TANGIPAH0A
22
109
06
00
10
1
LA
TERREB0NNE
22
113
06
00
10
2
LA
VERMILI0N
23
005
01
00
02
4
ME
CUMBERLAND
23
009
01
00
02
2
ME
HANC0CK
23
013
01
00
02
3
ME
KN0X
23
015
01
00
02
3
ME
LINC0LN
23
023
01
00
02
4
ME
SAGADAH0C
23
027
01
00
02
3
ME
VALD0
23
029
01
00
02
1
ME
WASHINGTON
23
031
01
00
02
5
ME
Y0RK
24
003
03
00
03
7
MD
ANNE ARUNDEL
24
005
03
00
03
7
MD
BALTIMORE
24
009
03
00
03
7
MD
CALVERT
24
015
03
00
03
7
MD
CECIL
24
017
03
00
03
7
MD
CHARLES
24
019
03
00
03
7
MD
D0RCHESTER
24
025
03
00
03
7
MD
HARF0RD
24
029
03
00
03
7
MD
KENT
24
033
03
00
03
7
MD
PRINCE GE0RGES
24
035
03
00
03
7
MD
QUEEN ANNES
24
037
03
00
03
7
MD
ST. MARYS
24
039
03
00
03
7
MD
SOMERSET
24
041
03
00
03
7
MD
TALB0T
24
045
03
00
03
7
MD
VIC0MIC0
24
047
03
00
03
6
MD
V0RCESTER
A-19
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
I0N
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
24
510
03
00
03
7
MD
BALTIM0RE CITY
25
001
01
00
02
9
MA
BARNSTABLE
25
005
01
00
03
1
MA
BRIST0L
25
007
01
00
03
1
MA
DUKES
25
009
01
00
02
7
MA
ESSEX
25
019
01
00
03
I
MA
NANTUCKET
25
021
01
00
02
8
MA
N0RF0LK
25
023
01
00
02
9
MA
PLYM0UTH
25
025
01
00
02
8
MA
SUFF0LK
26
001
05
00
01
3
MI
ALC0NA
26
003
05
00
01
1
MI
ALGER
26
005
05
00
01
2
MI
ALLEGAN
26
007
OS
00
01
3
MI
ALPENA
26
009
05
00
01
2
MI
ANTRIM
26
OH
05
00
01
3
MI
ARENAC
26
013
05
00
01
1
MI
BARAGA
26
017
05
00
01
3
MI
BAY
26
019
05
00
01
2
MI
BENZIE
26
021
05
00
01
2
MI
BERRIEN
26
029
05
00
01
2
MI
CHARLEVBIX
26
031
05
00
01
3
MI
CHEB0YGAN
26
033
05
00
01
1
MI
CHIPPEWA
26
041
05
00
01
2
MI
DELTA
26
047
05
00
01
2
MI
EMMET
26
053
05
00
01
1
MI
G0GEBIC
26
055
05
00
01
2
MI
GRAND TRAVERSE
26
061
05
00
01
1
MI
H0UGHT0N
26
063
05
00
01
3
MI
HUR0N
26
069
05
00
01
3
MI
I0SC0
26
063
05
00
01
1
MI
KEWEENAW
26
089
05
00
01
2
MI
LEELANAU
26
095
05
00
01
1
MI
LUCE
26
097
05
00
01
2
MI
MACKINAC
26
099
05
00
01
3
MI
MAC0ME
26
101
05
00
01
2
MI
MANISTEE
26
103
05
00
01
1
Ml
MARQUETTE
26
105
05
00
01
2
Ml
MAS0N
26
109
05
00
01
2
Ml
MEN0MINEE
26
115
05
00
01
4
MI
MONR0E
26
121
05
00
01
2
Ml
MUSKEG0N
A-20
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
ION
AREA
SUBREG
COUNTY
26
127
05
00
01
2
MI
0CEANA
26
131
05
00
01
1
MI
0NT0NAG0N
26
139
05
00
01
2
MI
0TT0VA
26
141
05
00
01
3
MI
PRESQUE ISLE
26
147
05
00
01
3
MI
ST. CLAIR
26
151
05
00
01
3
MI
SANILAC
26
153
05
00
01
2
MI
SCH00LCRAFT
26
157
05
00
01
3
Ml
TUSC0LA
26
159
05
00
01
2
Ml
VAN BUREN
26
163
05
00
01
4
MI
WAYNE
27
031
05
00
01
1
MN
C00K
27
075
05
00
01
1
MN
LAKE
27
137
05
00
01
1
MN
ST. L0UIS
28
045
04
00
09
6
MS
HANC0CK
28
047
04
00
09
6
MS
HARRIS0N
28
059
04
00
09
5
MS
JACKS0N
33
015
01
00
02
6
NH
R0CKINGHAM
34
001
02
00
03
4
NJ
ATLANTIC
34
003
02
01
03
3
NJ
BERGEN
34
007
02
00
03
5
NJ
CAMDEN
34
009
02
00
03
4
NJ
CAPE MAY
34
01 1
02
00
03
5
NJ
CUMBERLAND
34
013
02
00
03
3
NJ
ESSEX
34
015
02
00
03
5
NJ
GLOUCESTER
34
017
02
01
03
3
NJ
HUDS0N
34
023
02
01
03
3
NJ
MIDDLESEX
34
025
02
01
03
3
NJ
M0NM0UTH
34
029
02
00
03
4
NJ
0CEAN
34
033
02
00
03
5
NJ
SA'.EM
34
039
02
00
03
3
NJ
UNI0N
36
005
02
00
03
3
NY
BR0NX
36
01 1
05
00
01
5
NY
CAYUGA
36
013
05
00
01
4
NY
CHATAUQUA
36
029
05
00
01
4
NY
ERIE
36
045
05
00
01
5
NY
JEFFERS0N
36
047
02
01
03
3
NY
KINGS
36
055
05
00
01
5
NY
M0NR06
36
059
02
01
03
2
NY
NASSAU
36
061
02
01
03
3
NY
NEV Y0RK
36
063
05
00
01
5
NY
NIAGARA
A-21
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REG 10N
STATE
C0UNTY
ION
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
36
073
05
00
01
5
NY
0RLEANS
36
075
05
00
01
5
NY
0SWEG0
36
081
02
01
03
3
NY
QUEENS
36
085
02
01
03
3
NY
RICHM0ND
36
089
05
00
01
6
NY
ST LAWRENCE
36
103
02
00
03
2
NY
SUFF0LK
36
117
05
00
01
5
NY
WAYNE
36
119
02
00
03
2
NY
WESTCHESTER
37
013
04
00
03
9
NC
BEAUF0RT
37
015
04
00
03
9
NC
BERTIE
37
019
04
00
04
5
NC
BRUNSWICK
37
029
04
00
03
9
NC
CAMDEN
37
031
04
00
04
1
NC
CARTERET
37
041
04
00
03
9
NC
CH0WAN
37
049
04
00
03
9
NC
CRAVEN
37
053
04
00
03
8
NC
CURRITUCK
37
055
04
00
03
9
NC
DARE
37
095
04
00
03
9
NC
HYDE
37
129
04
00
04
4
NC
NEW KAN0VER
37
133
04
00
04
2
NC
0NSL0W
37
137
04
00
03
9
NC
PAML1C0
37
139
04
00
03
9
NC
PASQU0TANK
37
141
04
00
04
3
NC
PENDER
37
143
04
00
03
9
NC
PERQUIMANS
37
177
04
00
03
9
NC
TYRRELL
37
187
04
00
03
9
NC
WASHINGTON
39
007
05
00
01
4
0H
ASHTABULA
39
035
05
00
01
4
0H
CUYAH0GA
39
043
05
00
01
4
0K
ERIE
39
085
05
00
01
4
0H
LAKE
39
093
05
00
01
4
0H
L0RAIN
39
095
05
00
01
4
0H
LUCAS
39
123
05
00
01
4
0H
0TT0WA
39
143
05
00
01
4
0H
SANDUSKY
41
007
10
06
13
5
0R
CLATS0P
41
Oil
10
06
13
3
0R
C00S
41
015
10
06
13
2
0R
CURRY
41
019
10
06
13
3
0R
D0UGLAS
41
039
10
06
13
4
0R
LANE
41
041
10
06
13
4
0R
LINC0LN
A-22
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
I0N
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
41
057
10
06
13
5
0R
TILLAM00K
42
045
03
00
03
5
PA
DELAWARE
42
049
05
00
01
4
PA
ERIE
42
101
03
00
03
5
PA
PHILADELPHIA
44
001
01
00
03
1
RI
BRIST0L
44
003
01
00
03
1
RI
KENT
44
005
01
00
03
1
RI
NEWP0RT
44
007
01
00
03
1
RI
PR0VIDENCE
44
009
01
00
03
1
RI
VASH1NGT0N
45
013
04
00
05
2
SC
BEAUF0RT
45
019
04
02
05
1
SC
CHARLEST0N
45
029
04
00
05
2
SC
C0LLET0N
45
043
04
00
04
7
SC
GE0RGET0VN
45
051
04
00
04
6
SC
HORRY
48
007
06
00
10
8
TX
ARANSAS
48
039
06
00
10
6
TX
BRAZ0RIA
48
057
06
00
10
7
TX
CALH0UN
48
061
06
00
10
9
TX
CAMER0N
48
071
06
00
10
5
TX
CHAMBERS
48
167
06
00
10
5
TX
GALVEST0N
48
201
06
00
10
5
TX
HARRIS
48
239
06
00
10
7
TX
JACKS0N
48
245
06
00
10
4
TX
JEFFERS0N
48
261
06
00
10
9
TX
KENEDY
48
273
06
00
10
9
TX
KLEBERG
48
321
06
00
10
7
TX
MATAG0RDA
48
355
06
00
10
8
TX
NUECES
48
361
06
00
10
4
TX
0RANGE
48
391
06
00
10
8
TX
REFUG 10
48
409
06
00
10
8
TX
SAN PATRICI0
48
489
06
00
10
9
TX
WILLACY
51
001
03
00
03
6
VA
ACC0MACK
51
013
03
00
03
7
VA
ARLINGTON
51
036
03
00
03
7
VA
CHARLES CITY
51
059
03
00
03
7
VA
FAIRFAX
51
073
03
00
03
7
VA
GL0UCESTER
51
093
03
00
03
7
VA
ISLE 0F WIGHT
51
095
03
00
03
7
VA
JAMES CITY
51
099
03
00
03
7
VA
KING GE0RGE
51
103
03
00
03
7
VA
LANCASTER
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CR0SS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
0CEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REGI0N
STATE
C0UNTY
ION
AREA
SUBREG
C0UNTY
51
115
03
00
03
7
VA
MATHEWS
51
119
03
00
03
7
VA
MIDDLESEX
51
123
03
00
03
7
VA
NANSEM0ND
51
131
03
00
03
6
VA
N0RTHAMPT0N
51
133
03
00
03
7
VA
NORTHUMBERLAND
51
149
03
00
03
7
VA
PRINCE GE0RGE
51
153
03
00
03
7
VA
PRINCE WILLIAM
51
179
03
00
03
7
VA
STAFF0RD
51
181
03
00
03
7
VA
SURRY
51
193
03
00
03
7
VA
WESTMORELAND
51
199
03
00
03
7
VA
Y0RK
51
550
03
00
03
7
VA
CHESAPEAKE
51
650
03
00
03
7
VA
HAMPT0N
51
700
03
00
03
7
VA
NEWP0RT NEWS
51
710
03
00
03
7
VA
N0RF0LK
51
740
03
00
03
7
VA
P0RTSM0UTH
51
810
03
00
03
8
VA
VIRGINIA BEACH
53
009
10
06
13
9
VA
CLALLAM
53
027
10
06
13
7
VA
GRAYS HARB0R
53
029
10
00
14
6
VA
ISLAND
53
031
10
06
13
8
VA
JEFFERS0N
53
033
10
00
14
4
VA
KING
53
035
10
00
14
1
VA
KITSAP
53
045
10
00
14
2
VA
MAS0N
53
049
10
06
13
6
VA
PACIFIC
53
053
10
00
14
3
VA
PIERCE
53
055
10
00
14
8
VA
SAN JUAN
53
057
10
00
14
7
VA
SKAGIT
53
061
10
00
14
5
VA
SN0H0MISH
53
067
10
00
14
2
VA
THURST0N
53
073
10
00
14
9
VA
VHATC0M
55
003
OS
00
01
1
VI
ASHLAND
55
007
05
00
01
1
VI
BAYFIELD
55
009
05
00
01
2
VI
BR0VN
55
029
05
00
01
2
VI
D00R
55
031
05
00
01
1
VI
D0UGLAS
55
051
05
00
01
1
VI
IR0N
55
059
05
00
01
2
VI
KEN0SHA
55
061
05
00
0!
2
VI
KEWAUNEE
55
071
05
00
01
2
VI
MANIT0W0C
A-24
-------
TABLE A-2
ABRIDGED CROSS REFERENCE LIST
EPA
CASE
OCEAN
STATE
REG-
STUDY
REG I ON
STATE
COUNTY
ION
AREA
SUBREG
COUNTY
55 075
05
00
01
2
VI
MARINETTE
55 079
05
00
01
2
VI
MILVAUKEE
55 083
05
00
01
2
VI
OCONTO
55 089
05
00
01
2
VI
OZAUKEE
55 101
05
00
01
2
VI
RACINE
55 117
05
00
01
2
VI
SHEBOYGAN
-------
Sul)
Reg
ion
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
TABLE A-3
COASTAL REGIONS AND SUBREGIONS
Sub
Reg- Reg-
ion
ion
Great Lakes
06
0
Straits of Florida
Lake Superior
06
1
Cape Kennedy
Lake Michigan
06
2
Vero Beach
Lake Huron
06
3
Fort Pierce
Lake Erie
06
4
Salerno
Lake Ontario
06
5
Palm Beach
St. Lawrence River
06
6
Fort Lauderdale
Gulf of Maine
06
7
Miami
Eastport
06
8
Key West
Bar Harbor
07
0
Caribbean Sea
Rock land
07
1
Is la Mona
Portland
07
2
Puerto Rico
Kennebunkport
07
3
Vieques
Portsmouth
07
4
Culebra
Gloucester
07
5
St. Thomas
Boston
07
6
St. John
Cape Cod
07
7
St. Croix
Central Atlantic States
07
8
Canal Zone
New Bedford
08
0
Florida Gulf Coast
Long Island
08
1
Naples
New York
08
2
Port Charlotte
Atlantic City
08
3
Sarasota
Delaware Bay
08
4
Tampa
Chincoteague Bay
08
5
Bayonet Point
Chesapeake Bay
08
6
Crystal River
Currituck Sound
08
7
Jena
Pamlico Sound
08
8
Panacea
Carolina Coast
08
9
Apalachicola
Cape Lookout
09
0
Eastern Gulf of Mexico
Camp Lejeune
09
1
Panama City
Hampstead
09
2
Fort Walton
Wilmington
09
3
Pensacola
Cape Fear
09
4
Mobile
Myrtle Beach
09
5
Pascagoula
Georgetown
09
6
Gulfport
Gulf of Georgia
09
7
New Orleans
Charleston
09
8
Chandeleur Sound
Port Royal
09
9
Pilot Town
Savannah
10
0
Western Gulf of Mexico
Darien
10
1
Timbalier Bay
St. Marys
10
2
Vermilion Bay
Jacksonville
10
3
Cameron
St. Augustine
10
4
Port Arthur
Flagler
10
5
Galveston
Daytona
10
6
Freeport
-------
Reg-
ion
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
TABLE A-3
COASTAL REGIONS & SUBREGIONS
Sub
Sub
Reg
Reg
Reg-
ion
ion
ion
7
Port Lavaca
15
6
Anchorage
8
Corpus Christi
15
7
Kodiak
9
Brownsville
15
8
Chignik
0
Southern California
15
9
Unalaska
1
San Diego
16
0
Central Alaska
2
Newport Beach
16
1
Port Moller
3
Los Angeles
16
2
Bristol Bay
4
Ventura
16
3
Kuskokwim Bay
5
Santa Barbara
16
4
Hazen Bay
0
Central California
16
5
Yukon Delta
1
San Luis Obispo
16
6
St. Michael Bay
2
Monterey
16
7
Norton Bay
3
Santa Cruz
16
8
Nome
4
San Francisco
16
9
Teller
5
Oakland
17
0
Northern Alaska
6
Vallejo
17
1
Shishmaref
7
Point Reyes
17
2
Kotzebue
8
Fort Ross
17
3
Kivalina
9
Fort Bragg
17
4
Point Lay
0
North Pacific Coast
17
5
Barrow
1
Eureka
17
6
Dease Inlet
2
Port Orford
17
7
Harrison Bay
3
Coos Bay
17
8
Prudhoe Bay
4
Newport
17
9
Kaktovik
5
Tillamook
18
0
State of Hawaii
6
Raymond
18
1
Hawaii
7
Hoquiam
18
2
Maui
8
Hoh Head
18
3
Honolulu
9
Port Angeles
18
4
Kauai
0
Puget Sound
18
5
Midway
1
Bremerton
18
1
Mareus
2
Olympis
18
7
Wake
3
Tacoma
18
8
Johnston
4
Seattle
18
9
Palmyra
5
Everett
19
0
Pacific Islands
6
Oak Harbor
19
1
Guam
7
Anacortes
19
2
Palau
8
Friday Harbor
19
3
Truk
A-27/28
-------
APPENDIX B
STATE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX B
STATE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA INVENTORY
B-l GENERAL
An analysis of state water quality criteria is outlined in table B-l.
The table is a condensation of water quality criteria, and a listing of
acceptable limits per parameter for each state. This analysis is not
intended to replace the individual state listings; it is merely a
simplified method of comparing the state standards on a nationwide basis.
As a definition for an acceptable limit, a number of states used a quali-
fying statement rather than a numerical quantity. This made it difficult
to determine the exact intended meaning, or acceptable limit. The problem
was resolved by creating three broad categories into which each qualifying
statement is placed. The categories are designated "o", "a", and "b".
(o) None is permitted
(a) Shall be below those concentrations which adversely affect
public health or characteristic usage, or which may cause
harm to biota
(b) Aesthetic values shall not be impaired by the presence of
material which offends the sense of sight, smell, taste or
touch.
In some cases where a loss of intent might occur by categorizing a
B-l
-------
statement, an asterisk is used to indicate that further explanation is
required. Reference is made to paragraph B-2 and in some cases, to the
actual text of the standards.
The status of the state standards and the approval dates are listed with
the following rates:
FA fully approved water quality standards - antidegradation
statement included
F approved water quality standards - antidegradation statement
not included
PA partially approved water quality standards - antidegradation
statement included
P partially approved water quality standards - antidegradation
statement not included
B-2 REFERENCE NOTES (See table B-l)
ALABAMA
DO - 4.0 permitted below treated wastes
MPN - Conforms to EPA standards
RADIO - Drinking water standard
ALASKA
MPN - Not to exceed shellfish sanitation
Part I USPHS
TEMP - Class D-5% change Class C< 68°
FILTER SOLIDS - Class - D None to make receiving
waters unfit for indicated use
Class - E No visible evidence of wastes
Less than acute or chronic problem levels
B-2
-------
CONNECTICUT
RADIO - B<1000 pc /j2 a< 3 pc/JI
FOAM OIL - None except that which results from treated wastes (SB-SC)
DELAWARE
DO - Not less than the natural level of ocean
RADIO - 8 <1000 pc/i a < 3 pc/J?
MPN - 1000 max. for bathing and swimming waters
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MPN - Values not applicable during rainfall
TURBIDITY - Creek bottom to be visible in wading season
FLORIDA
ODOR - < 24 @ 60°C (Threshold odor number) (Class 1)
pH - Change artifically no more than 1.0
CL - < 10% above ambient
pH - Class V 4.5 min. swamp water
ODOR - Class V - None to interfere with intended use
HAWAII
MPN - Fecal Strep, class AA
(MF) 7/100 mi
Class A 30/100 mi
Class B & I 100/100mj2
TURBIDITY - Shall not exceed from natural condition more than
5% Class AA
10% Class A
20% Class B
FILTER SOLIDS - Except naturally caused materials
B-3
-------
ILLINOIS (Lake Michigan)
TURBIDITY - None to cause substantial visible contrast
TEMP - No more than 85°F
DO - 90% saturation
INDIANA (Fresh water)
DO - 7o saturation
LOUISIANA
DO - 50% saturation
TOXIC - TLM 48/10
MAINE
MPN - (SB^) 240 in non-shell fish growing areas
(SB?) 500 in non-shell fish growing areas
(SD; Not to exceed levels harmful to public health
FLOAT SOLIDS - Non attributable to industrial wastes
MARYLAND
DO - 6.0 in shellfish areas
TEMP - 10°F in some waters
MASSACHUSETTS
TEMP - None that will exceed recommended limits
FLOAT SOLIDS - None except from treated wastes
MPN, TURBIDITY, COLOR - None that would impair usage of this class
MICHIGAN
TOXIC - C - 1/10 96 hr. median
RADIO - to be established when more information is available
B-4
-------
MISSISSIPPI
TOXIC - l/10th 48 hr TLM
All waste shall receive min. of secondary treatment
NEW HAMPSHIRE
DO - Not less than 75% saturation
pH - Natural
TEMP - D - S 90°F
B-C NHF&GD, NEIWPCC or NTAC - D1 whichever provides most
effective control
NEW YORK
OIL FOAM - None which are readily visible
TOXICITY - None that will taint flesh or edible species
OHIO
ODOR - <24 ^ 60°c threshold odor number
RADIO - B <1000 pci/ia 3 pci/jfl
TEMP - < 95°F
TOXIC - < 107. 48 hour TLM
MPN - <200 for water contact recreation
OREGON
COLOR - Jackson turbidity units
MPN - 240 outside shellfish growing areas
RADIO - Not to exceed max. permissible concentration
RHODE ISLAND
TEMP - None to exceed recommended limits
FLOAT SOLIDS - None except from treated wastes
B-5
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
MPN - U.S. Public Health Standard
pH -^3/10 pH of effluent free waters in same area
TEXAS
CLASS I - Chlorides <10,000
II - Chlorides from 10,000 to 16,500
III - >16,500 ms/i
values listed represent sample areas
TEMP - 1.5°during summer
VIRGINIA
TEMP - 1.5° (June-August)
MPN - Subclass A secondary contact - 5000
Subclass B primary contact 2400
WASHINGTON
TEMP - Waters shall not exceed
55 in temp - AA
61 in temp - A
66 in temp - B
71 in temp - C
OIL FOAM - B-C shall not affect water usage or taint flesh or edible
species
WISCONSIN
MPN - 5000 - for partial body contact
TEMP - shall not exceed 89°F
PUERTO RICO
TEMP - None in excess of 93°F
B-6
-------
GUAM
TEMP - 85°F
pH - Shall not change more than 0.1 from natural
VIRGIN ISLAND
TEMP - 1.5°during summer
-------
TABLE B-l.
WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
w
I
00
State
Class
MPN
pH
do2
mg/1
Temp
(°Fl
Above
Amb
BOD
mg/1
Dis
Solids
mg/1
Radio
so4
mg/1
CI
mg/I
Toxic
Turbid
6.0
«
25
50
-
F
2-68
E
-
7. 8-8. 5
>6.0*
¦
*
25
50
*
Connecticut
SA
70
6. 8-8. 5
6.0
4.0
a
a
o
0
FA
2-68
SB
700
5.0
4.0
a
a
a
*
SC
5, 000
5.0
4.0
a
a
a
*
SD
a
6. 8-8-5
2.0
4.0
*
a
a
a
*
Delaware
70*
7. 0-8.5
5.0
*
a
b
b
FA
7-71
District of Columbia
I
200*
6.0-8.5
4.0
5.0
FA
1-69
I]
1,000*
4.0
5.0
ni
1,000*
3.0
5.0
IV
200*
4.0
5.0
V
6.0-8.5
4.0
Florida
II
70
6,0-8.5
4.0
a
500
a
*
a
50
b
*
b
FA
1-69
nx
1,000
6.0-8.5
5.0
a
50G
a
*
a
50
b
b
b
IV
6.0-8.5
4.0
a
a
a
b
b
b
V
5.0-9.5
2.0
*
Georgia
2
1,000
6.0-8.5
4.0
10.0
a
F
7-67
3
5,000
5.0
10.0
a
Hawaii
AA
70*
8.0-8.5
6.0
2. Cft
28,000
a
a
*
0
FA
6-71
A
6. 8-8.5
5.0
2. eft:
a
a
¦
0
B
*
6. 8-8. 5
4. 5
2.
-------
Table B-l. Water Quality Criteria (Continued)
W
I
State
Class
MPN
pH
do2
mg/l
Temp
<°F)
Above
Amb
BOD
mg/l
Dis
Solids
mg/l
Radio
so4
mg/1
CI
mg/l
Toxic
Turbid
(JTU)
Color
Odor
Float
Solids
Std
Appr
Status
Approval
Dates
Michigan
A1
5,000
<0. 5A
a
10.0
a
1, 000*
USPHS
a
PA
4-68
A2
5. 000
6.5-B. 8
a
10.0
a
•
a
B1
1.000
6. 5-6.8
a
*90.0*
a
•
a
B2
5,000
6.5-8. 8
a
*90.0'
a
•
a
C
5,000
6.5-8.8
a
<87. 0"
a
*
*
a
D
5.000
<0. 5A
3.0
NA
a
1,000*
a
£
5,000
6. 5-3. 8
2. 5
10.0
a
*
a
Minnesota
1A
1
500
250
250
5
15
3
FA
11-69
B
50
500
250
250
5
15
3
C
4,000
500
250
250
25
15
3
D
4,000
a
a
2A
1,000
6. 5-8. 5
5.0
50
10
30
B
1,000
6. 5-9. 0
5.0
25
C
5,000
6.0-9.5
3.0
25
ab
3A
6. 5-8.5
50
B
6.0-9.0
100
C
6.0-9. 5
250
4A
S. 0-8. 5
B
0.0-9.5
a
5
5,000
5. 5-10.0
Mississippi
1
5,000
6.5-8.5
4.0
10.0
500
b
P
5-68
2
70
4.0
10.0
b
3
1,000
4.0
10.0
750
b
4
4.0
10.0
750
«
b
5
6. 5-B. 5
3.0
10.0
750
b
6
5,0-9.5
3.0
10.0
1,000
b
New Hampshire
A
50
-
m
0
0
5
15
o
0
FA
12-70
B
70
6.5-8.5
m
*
a
25
b
0
0
C
6. 5-8. 5
5.0
a
25
b
b
b
D
2.0
a
b
b
b
b
New Jersey
TW-1
200
6. 5-8.5
4. 0>
4.0*
USPHS
a
a
a
a
a
b
a
FA
7-71
TW-2
770
6. 5-8.5
4.0
4.0*
USFHS
a
a
a
a
a
b
a
TW-3
1, 500
0. 5-8. 5
3.0
4.0*
USPHS
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
CW-1
50
6.5-8.5
5.0
4.0*
USPHS
a
a
a
a
a
b
a
CW-2
200
6.5-8.5
5.0
4.0*
USPHS
a
a
a
a
a
b
a
New York
SA
70
5.0
a
a
• a
a
0
FA
7-71
SB
5.0
a
a
a
a
0
SC
5.0
a
a
*
»
SD
5.0
a
a
*
*
North Carolina
SA
70
6. 8-8. 5
5.0
4.0*
a
a
a
a
0
FA
1-71
SB
200
6.0-8. 5*
5.0
4.0*
a
a
a
a
0
SC
1, 000
6. 0-8. 5*
5. 0*
4.0*
a
a
a
a
a
-------
Table B-l. Water Quality Criteria (Continued)
State
Class
MPN
pH
do2
rag/1
Temp
<°F)
Above
Amb
BOD
mg/'l
Dis
Solids
mg/l
Radio
S04
mg/l
CI
mg/l
Toxic
Turbid
(JTU)
Color
Odor
Float
Solids
Std
S&fus
Approval
Ohio
1
5,000*
b
500
*
a
b
»
b
PA
3-68
2
5. 0-9.0
2.0
*
750
a
a
b
b
b
A
6.0-8.5
5.0
5.0
a
*
b
b
b
B
6. 0-8.5
3.0
*
a
*
b
b
b
Oregon
70*
7.0-8.5
6.0
a
*
a
5*
a
0
FA
1-70
Pennsylvania
1
1,000
6. 0-8. 5
6.0
a
a
250
150
a
a
F
5-68
2
5,000
6. 5-8.5
5.0
5.0
a
a
250
250
a
%
3
5, 000
7. 0-9.0
5.0
5.0
a
a
250
a
a
4
3.5
2.0
a
a
250
a
a
Rhode Island
SA
70
6. 8-8.5
6.0
*
a
a
a
a
0
0
FA
1-71
SB
700
5.0
*
a
a
a
a
o
0
SC
a
5.0
-
a
a
a
a
b
*
SD
a
6.8-8.5
2.0
*
a
a
a
a
b
-
South Carolina
SA
*
*
5.0
a
a
0
FA
4-69
SB
200
6.75-8.5
5.0
a
a
0
SC
1. GOO
6.75-8.5
4.0
a
a
0
Texas
I
70
7.0-9.0
6.0
4.0*
3.0
12,000
a
700
5,000
0
0
FA
5-69
n
70
7. 0-9.0
6.0
4.0*
3.0
30,000
a
2.000
14,000
0
0
m
50
7. 0-9. 0
7.0
4.0*
1.0
45,000
a
3,000
20,000
0
0
Virginia
i
*
6. 0-8.5
5.0
4. 0*
500
800
a
b
a
FA
2-71
n
*
6. 0-8.5
5.0
4.0*
500
800
a
b
a
Washington
AA
70
7. 8-8. 5
7.0
•
a
a
5
to
b
FA
1-68
A
70
7. 8-8. 5
6.0
*
a
a
5
b
b
B
1,000
7. 8-8. 5
5.0
a
a
10
*
C
1.000
7. 0-9. 5
4.0
*
a
a
10
*
•
Wisconsin
1
5,000
6. 0-9. 0
a
500
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
a
FA
1-68
2
5.0
5.0
a
a
a
a
l
b
b
b
a
3
1,000*
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
t>
4
6.0-9.0
2.0
*
750
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
Puerto Rico
SA
*
EXISTING NATURAL CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN
FA
12-68
SB
70
5.0
a
0
SC
1,000
6. 8-8.5
5.0
4.0
a
0
SD
5,000
6.8-8. 5
4.5
4.0
b
b
SE
6.8-8.5
4. 5
4.0
b
b
Guam
A
200
7.0-8. 3
6.0
*
a
a
0
FA
6-68
B
PUS
-
6.0
1.5
a
a
0
C
7. 0*8. 5
6.0
a
a
0
Virgin Islands
A
*
a
0
FA
4-70
B
70
7.0-8. 5
5.5
4.0'
a
0
1 C
1,000
6. 5-0. 5 | 5.5
a
0
-------
APPENDIX C
DATA BANK INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX
DATA BANK INVENTORY
INTRODUCTION
The summary of Data Banks has been organized in four sections:
I Federal Agencies
II Independent Agencies
III State and Local Governments
IV Universities
Data Bank Centers have been identified as well as Data Files. A summary
of these Data Banks is presented in Table C-l.
The contact names indicate those individuals interviewed in the process
of conducting this inventory. The party contacted was able to provide
operating data and descriptive literature. The contact named is not
necessarily the data bank manager, nor the party who is to receive
formal data processing retrieval inquiries.
The Data Bank reference number indicated in the Table C-l, Summary of
Data Banks, is the Data Bank number used on the individual data bank form.
Two indexes of these data bases (one by title and one by contact) are
provided at the end of this appendix on Tables C-2 and C-3, respectively;
these may prove useful to locate particular information.
C-l
-------
TABLE C-l
SUMMARY OF DATA BANKS
SECTION I - FEDERAL AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT
BANK
STATUS
D.B.
REF
NO. CONTACT
Agency
Service
File
AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Soil Conservation Service
E
E
Barber
Silliman
COMMERCE
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin.
E
3
Smith
Environmental Data Service
E
4
Austin
Environmental Index (ENDEX)
P
5
Morris
National Climatic Center (NCC)
E
6
Haggard
Ocean & Atmospheric Scientific
P
7
Morris
Information System (OASIS)
Selective Dissemination of
P
8
Morris
Information (SDI)
National Marine Fisheries Service
E
9
Pearce
National Ocean Survey, Lake Survey Ctr.
E
10
Hanna
Tidal Current Service
E
11
CDR Swanson
National Weather Service
E
12
Neilon
National Oceanographic Data Center
E
13
Ochinero
NODC Archive Data Bank File
E
14
Heimerdinger
NODC National Marine Data Base
P
15
Heimerdinger
Directory
NODC Accessions Production Inventory
E
16
Heimerdinger
System
NODC Coastal Zone Data
E
17
Barjeski
NODC National Technical Service(NTIS)
E
18
Urbach
NODC World Data Center, A Oceano-
E
19
Molo
Graphic Data Exchange
Bureau of the Census - National Bureau of
E
20
Gignilliat
Standards, Population and Industrial
Density Trends
* E: Existing
P; Planned
C-2
-------
Table C-l, Continued
DEPARTMENT
Agency
Service
File
DEFENSE
BANK
STATUS
REF
NO. CONTACT
Ass't Secretary of Defense, Health and
Environment
AIR FORCE
Air Force Office of Surgeon General
Pollution Data Retrieval System
Wright Patterson AFB, Environmental Lab
Water and Air Quality Data
ARMY
21 Busterud
E 22 LCOL Kittilstad
E 23 LCOL Letnole
E 24 MAJ Kush
E 25 CAPT Bartlett
Army Advanced Research Projects Agency E
Environmental Hygiene Data Processing E
System
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Coastal Engineering Research Center E
(CERC)
New England Hydrologic Network E
Development Plan
Great Lakes Study E
NAVY
26 Roberts
27 Garman
28 Walten
29 Cooper
30 LT Blankenship
Naval Operations - Navy Environmental
E
31
CAPT Reed
Protection Data
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
E
32
CDR D1Emidio
NCEL Baseline Research Design, Naval
P
33
LCDR Riley
Oceanographic Office
Naval Weather Service
E
34
LCDR Kirk
Marine Corps, Natural Resources
E
35
Kearns
Management Program
HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
National Institute of Health
E
36
Kissman
Public Health Service, Nat'l Library of
E
37
Bachrach
Medicine
C-3
-------
Table C-l, Continued
DEPARTMENT
Agency
Service
File
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK REF
STATUS NO. CONTACT
Office of Environmental Planning
E
38
Freeman
INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation - Land Management
E
39
Ellingboe
Data
Bureau of Sports, Fisheries & Wildlife
E
40
Walker
Geological Survey, Water Resources
National Computer System, National
E
41
Whetstone
Network
National Water Data Exchange (NAWDEX)
P
42
Whetstone
Earth Resources Observation System
P
43
Campbell
(EROS)
Earth Resources Tech'l Satellite
P
44
Bratton
(ERTS A & B)
Gulf Coast Hydro Science Center
E
45
Sauer
Office of Water Data Coordination
E
45.1
Langford
Catalog of Information of Water Data
Office of Water Resources Research
E
46
Hershey
Water Resources Scientific Infor-
E
47
Jensen, R.
mation Center
Generalized Information Processing
P
48
Greenwell
Sys (GIPSY), U of Oklahoma; U of
Wisconsin, U of N. Carolina; Cornell
U., UC at Los Angeles
National Park Service
E
49
Morris, M.
TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard - Area Data Base, Marine
E
50
CDR Lindak
Environmental Parameters
Chemical Hazardous Spill Response Sys
P
51
CDR Glass
(CRIS)
Marine Environmental Protection Program
E
52
Ketchel
On the Scene Spill Clean-up Mgr.
E
53
Charter
C-4
-------
Table C-l, Continued
SECTION II - INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
BANK
REF
DEPARTMENT
STATUS
NO.
CONTACT
Agency
Service
File
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
E
54
Schoen
Argonne National Research Library
E
55
Zaichiek
Great Lakes
BattelLe Memorial Institute
E
56
Carroll
Ecological Info & Analysis Center
(EI AC)
Oak Ridge National Lab
E
57
Auerbach
Environmental Info System
E
58
Caton
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Solid Waste Info Retrieval System (SWIRS)
E
59
Connolly
Water Programs, Applied Technology
E
60
Wastler
Water Quality Protection Branch
Water Quality Data Processing
E
61
Thorpe
Technical Data and Information Branch
E
62
Wirth
Water Quality Surveillance Systems
E
63
Horn
Water Quality Data File, STORET
E
64
Conger
Data and Information Services
E
65
Lewis, J.
Data Operations and Services
E
66
Taylor
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT - COUNCIL
E
67
Cahn
ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, THERMAL DISCHARGE
E
68
Gakner
DATA BASE
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, E 69 Citron
Smithsonian Institute Center For Short
Lived Phenomena
C-5
-------
Table C-l, Continued
SECTION III - STATES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
STATES
BANK
STATUS
REF
NO. CONTACT
Departments
Projects
CALIFORNIA
California Water Resources Control
Board, Office of Planning
San Francisco Bay Study
Monterey Basin Project Study, Data
Management Committee
Automatic Data Processing,
Sacramento
Automatic Data Processing, Los
Angeles
Commission of Coastal Resources (CMC)
Resources Agency - Dept. of Navigation
and Ocean Development, Calif. Compre-
hensive Ocean Area Plan (COAP)
Dept. of Fish and Game
Dept. of Public Health, Sanitation
Lab, Laboratory Testing Certification
So. Calif. Association of Governments
(SCAG)
So. Calif. Coastal Water Research
Project (SCCWRP) Consortium of Counties
Los Angeles, Chamber of Commerce, Ocean
Economic Committee
MAINE, Dept. of Fish, Wildlife & Marine
Resources (MIDAS)
MARYLAND, Montgomery County Public Health,
Environmental Health Service
NEW YORK Dept. of Environmental Conser-
vation
NORTH CAROLINA Coastal Plains Center
Consortium, Marine Development Services
OREGON Dept. of Environmental
PENNSYLVANIA Water Quality Mgt. Infor-
mation System (WAMIS)
TEXAS Water Quality Board, Bays and
Estuaries Program
E
70
Lewis
E
71
Lewis
E
72
Holland
E
73
McDonnell
E
74
Snow
E
75
Krueger
E
76
Twitchell
E
77
Fisk
E
78
Moskowitz
E
79
Hotchkiss
E
80
Hlavka
E
81
Hillman
P
82
Christie
E
83
McCaw
E
84
Jensen, A.
P
85
DuBach
E
86
Jensen, J.
P
87
Stanek
E
88
Whittington
C-6
-------
Table C-l, Continued
BANK
REF
STATUS
NO.
CONTACT
COLUMBIA RIVER Basin Consortium
P
89
Garza
]TION IV - UNIVERSITIES
Cornell University, Langnoir Laboratory
E
90
Likens
New England Marine Resources Information
E
91
Gray
Program, Consortium of State Agencies and
Universities
Sea Grant, Dept. of Commerce, NOAA
E
92
Abel
Texas, A&M University, Civil Engineering
E
93
Hann, R.
Dept., Estuarine System Program
Texas, Gulf Universities Research Corp-
E
94
Lohse
oration, Gulf Environmental Program,
Consortium of 17 Universities (GURC)
University of California, Berkeley
E
95
Twiss
University of California, Los Angeles
E
96
Synder
University of California, San Diego,
E
97
Schneider
Scripps Institute of Oceanography
University of California, Santa Barbara
E
98
Culler
University of Michigan, Sea Grant Office,
E
99
Armstrong
Great Lakes Study
University of So. California, School of
E
100
Van Arsdol
Public Administration, Urban Affairs,
California Coastal Region Population Study
University of Wisconsin
E
101
Green, T.
Vanderbilt University
E
102
Parker
Virginia Institute of Marine Science,
E
103
Pleasants
Consortium of State Agencies and Univ-
ersities, Marine Environment and Resources
Research Mgt. System (MERRMS)
104
Woods Hole Institution of Oceanography
E
Sass
C-7
-------
TABLE C-2
ALPHABETICAL INDEX BY TITLE OF DATA BANK
UftTA BAUK IiJDLX DB REF
CONTACT NO.
Air Force Office of Surgeon General
22
I-COL Kittilstad
Argonne IJat'l Ifcsearch Library Great Lakes
55
Zaichiek
Arirty Mvanced Research Projects Agency (USArrrry)
2C
Ittierts
Ass't Sec. of Defense, Health and Env. (DOD)
21
Bustnrud
Atomic Energy Carcriission
54
Schoen
/jjto. Data Processing, Sac. (CA)Viator Itesourccs
73
"fcDcnnell
Auto. Dat Processing, LA (CA) Water It:sources
74
Snow
Battelle Memorial Inst. (EIAC)
56
Carroll
Bur. of the Census - IJat'l Bur. of Stds,,
20
Cignilliat
Bur. of ]fcclanaticn - Land Mgt. Data
39
Ellingboc
Bur. of Sjjorts, Fisheries & Wildlife
40
WalJ;er
Calif. Water Resources Control Board,
70
Lev/is
Qiemical Hazardous Spill hesponse Sys. (liSCG)
51
CDH Glass
Coast Guard-Area Data Base, Marine Env. (USCG)
50
CDR Linda!.
Coastal lJngrg research Center (CEIC) (COL!)
20
Walton
Colur.ijia ] liver Basin Consortium
39
(iaxza
Corrmissian of Coastal ll->sources (C1C) (CA)
75
Krueger
Cornell University, Langnoir Laboratory
90
Likens
Council an Environmental Quality
G7
Cairn
Data and Information Services (I PA)
CD
lx;v/is, J.
Data Colorations and Services (EPA)
CI 6
'i'aylor
Dept. of Fish and Game, CA
77
rid-.
Dept. of Public Health, Sanitation Lab, (CA)
70
Ibskowitz
Earth resources Cbservaticn Sys. (EIO ) (USCS)
43
Cnrqijcll
Eartli Jksourccs Tech'l Satellite (EHi'S AfiD) (USrs)
44
Bratton
LV. Ilygione Data Processing System (US Amy)
27
Garmon
Environmental Data Service (IJOAA)
4
Austin
Environmental Index (HIDEX) (IIQAA)
L>
' orris
Fbd. Pcwer Cotrr.iissian, 'llierrnal Disci large l ata
C3
Galcner
Ibrost Service
1
Barber
Gen. Info. Processing Sys. (GIPSY, (uses)
40
nroenwell
Great Lakes Stuay (ODE)
30
L" Blankenship
Gulf Coast Hydro Sci. Center (USGS)
45
Sauer
L. A., Chancer of Coimerce, Ocean Economic (CA)
31
llillman
Maine, De^it. of Fish, Wildlife & ilarine (ITXAS)
a 2
Christie
Marine Corps, natural IGsources ligt. (USU)
35
Eoams
Marine Env. Protection Program (USCG)
52
Ketchel
Maryland, i ontgoiury County Public Health, Env.
¦J3
i cCaw
C-8
-------
DTffA LiAui; EICEX HT OUTAC?
no.
Iiat'l
nat'l
liat'l
Uat'l
Iiat'l
nat'l
iiaiteruy Da;sin Project Study,Data I igt.CcrmitteG 72
GoKyuber System, Iiat'l network (USC£) 41
ituriiKi Fisheries Service (LJOAA) 9
Ocean Survey, Lake Survey Ctr. (IKWJ 10
Oceanogr^iiic Data Center (nQAA) 13
Ocn. & Atmospheric Adm. (MO/iA) 3
Water Data Exchange (tMOEX) (USGS) 42
national Climatic Center (ICC) (NOAA) G
liaticmal Institute of Health (IILJJ) 36
national Park Service 49
national tfeather Service (MQAA) 12
naval Facilities Engrg. Gonmand (USl!) 32
naval Operations-lJavy En v. Protection Data (USO 31
Ilaval Wbatlier Service 34
Ifew Iiigland IJarine Resources Info. Program, 91
New Ilanpshire, Water It;sources Dev. Plan (OOE) 29
New York Dept. of Env. Conservation 84
north Carolina Coastal Plains Center Consortium, 85
LJCEL Baseline Research Itesign, Ilaval (USII) 33
OiX: Accessions Production Inventory Sys. (naAA) 1C
IJODC Arciiive Data Bank File (nQAA) 14
nCUC Coastal Zone Data (IJOAA) 17
NCUC Nat'l Marine Data Base Directory (NQAA) 15
NQDC Nat'l 'itoch'l Service (NT IS) (NOAA) 10
HODC Warlti Data Center, A Oceana graphic (IJOAA) 19
Oak Ridge Uat'l Lab 57
Oak Ridge Nat'l Lab., EIAC 58
Oaean & Atmos. Sci. Info. Sys. (CftSIS) (NQAA) 7
Off. of LHv. Sci., Smitlisonian Institute Center 69
Off. of Water Data Coordination Cat. of (USGS) 45.
Office of Environmental Planning (lflJD) 38
Office of Water Research (USGS) 46
Cn the Scene Spill Clean-up Mgr. (USOG) 53
Oregon Dept. of Drvironmental Quality 86
Pennsylvania Vtiter Quality Mgt.Info.Sys. (UAIUS) 87
Pollution Data Ittrieval System (USAF) 23
Public llealtli Service, nat'l Lib. of Ifcd. (ID3J) 37
Resources Agency - Dept. of navigation and Ocn. 76
Holland
Whetstone
Efearoe
Uanna
Ocliirvoro
Sfciitli
Vhetstone
Haggard
Kissman
Jbrris, H.
Ileilon
(DR D'liniclio
CAPi' I toed
LCDR Kirk
Gray
Cooper
Jensen, A.
DuBach
LCDR Riley
Iieimerdinger
IleimcrxJinger
Barjoski
Iieimerdinger
Urbacli
IJolo
Auerbach
Caton
fforris
Citron
LLangford
Freeman
Ilersliey
Charter
Jensen, J.
Stanek
LOCXj Leirole
Barf uracil
Twibdiell
TABLE C-2
-------
DATA BANK HJEEX HEF COJTACT
IK).
San Francisco Bay Study (CA)
Sea Grant, Dept. of Centre roe, IJOAA
Selective Disseminaticn of Info. (SDI) (IJOAA)
So. Calif. Association of Governments (SCAG) (CA) 79
So. Calif. Coastal Water Research Project (CA)
Soil Conservation Service
Solid Waste Info Retrieval Sys (SWIPS) (EPA)
Tech'l Data and Info Branch (EP/v)
Texas Water equality Board, Bays and Estuaries
Texas, A & II University, Civil Engrg. Dept.,
Texas, Gulf U. Research Corp. (GURC)
Tidal Current Service (NQAA)
U. of Ilich., Sea Grant Office, Great Lakes
U. of So. Calif., Sciiool of Public Mm.,
University of California, Berkeley, CA
University of California, Eos Angeles, CA
71
Lev/is
92
Abel
8
f lorris
79
Hotchkiss
80
Illavka
2
Sillimon
59
Ccnnolly
62
Wirth
88
Ifliittington
93
Ilann, R.
94
Ldise
11
CDR Swanson
99
Armstrong
University of California, San Diego, Scripps,CA 97
University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 98
University of Wisconsin 101
Vanderbilt liiiversity 102
Virginia Institute of ilarine Sci., Consortium 103
Water and Air Quality Data (USAF) 25
Water Programs, Applied Teclmology (EPA) GO
Water (Quality Data File, STOFLT (EPA) G4
Mater Quality DTEA Processing (EPA) G1
Watur (Xaality Surveillance Systems (EPA) G3
Water i^sources Sci. Info. Genter (USGS) 47
Woods Hole Institution of Oceanography 104
Wright Patterson AFB, Environnuntal LAB 24
100 Van Arsdol
95 Itoiss
96 Synder
Scimeider
Culler
Green, T.
Par) :er
Pleasants
CAPT Bartlett
VJastler
Conger
Thorpe
Horn
Jensen, R.
Sass
!W Rush
C-10
TABLE C-2
-------
INDEX
ALPHABETICAL BY CONTACT NAME
H.F,
•
i.40«
caiv/jji'
Sea i^rant, Le^t. of Cuxurce, iUu\
92
Abel
U. of iiicii., Sea (oral it Office, Great .waives
ya
;an.t3trcji kj
Ouk jiutju uat'l
J7
Auerbacn
unvirou juital uata Serv-i.cc (WowO
4
Austin
iAujIic licaltil Service, i.ut11 of Ifcxi. (lilAV)
37
liacnracii
j.'oresu Service
1
Barber
. »OlXJ tjoustal Lione uata (1XJ; j »)
17
Barjeski
iuurti* iteuourcos Vocu'l Satellite(iJli?S A&Ii) (USGS) 44
Brattcm
ziuii't Sec. of Defense, Jiealtn and Lnv. (DOD)
21
Busterud
Council oti Liiviruuiiuiital (xuility
G7
Calm
uirui Ujaourojs li-iservation Syti. (LiU ) (USGS)
43
Canvbell
liactelie ii-'i.ioriai Inst. (LIAC)
i»G
Carroll
uoiw Riuge uat'l j-ajj., L.L»C
i»a
Caton
Ui tiie Scene Spill Clean-up iijr. (USCG)
b3
Giarter
Jmuie, uept. of Fisn, Wiluiife u i iariiie (i JLu>S)
32
Qiristie
off. of ijiv. Sci., Smithsonian Institute Center
tt)
Citron
Water QU/'-uI'iY uata File, SiUiUV (LP
-------
CU/iYvCT HOJX
151'.
;j0. La;?iUx'
'it:xas, A & M University, Civil Lngrg. Uupt.,
lJ3
liann, U.
Wat'l Ocean Survey, x^ake Survey Ctr. (LJOAA)
10
llaiuia
ijQUC Accessions Production Inventory Sys. (IDAA)
1C
lieiiiicrdinger
iJQUC Arcnive Data Bank File (iOiA)
14
lie iiicr dinger
iJOuc Dat'l Marine Data base Directory (IKmjJ
13
1 leir.iur dinger
Office of Water ftesearcu (USGS)
46
liersiiey
I., A., Oiainuer of Commerce, Ocean Uconoroic (CA)
iil
hillinan
So. Calif Coastal Water Researcu Project (CA)
UO
illai^a
Ifcaiterey Basin Project Study,Data Ikjt .Coiiraittcx)
72
Holland
Water C*Jaiity Surveillance Systems (L1V»)
G3
liom
So. Calif. Association of Qjvenunuits (SCZ.G) (CA)
7P. idr!.
ijCLL Baseline iusearcn uusign, naval (uii.)
33
1XDI: liley
idr Forcu Office of Gurcjuon General
i-Cdij ivittilstati
Pollution Data retrieval System (U&vF)
23
DCOL Lernole
Great Lakes Study (CDL)
30
LT Blankenship
Maryland, ijoutcpmery County I'uLlic ijeaitn, uiv.
< ->
uJ
i kjCav.
-tiuco. Data Processing, Sac. (CA) Water Jesourcoj
73
iicDamell
nQuC Ivbrlu Data center, a Oceu.iugruj. *lie (,.UwO
1J
i olo
ijiv'.ruiuii-ntai Iuuo; (.l^uLA) (ijuiuO
3
x it arris
uo-an u Sci. Info. . (GuSIS) (*/w^^»)
7
; orris
Selective ijisseiainatiui of Info. (LDI) (..u^J
j
. lurris
national Pctriv Service
¦10
. orri, h.
of Puulic uealtu, Sanitation ijaD, (CA)
7o
iiosivowitz
Wrignt Patterson /\FL, Dnvironiiental .uaB
24
iAJ Ijuah
natiusial VJUatner Servicu (..u^O
12
. ^ilon
C-12
TABLE C-3
-------
4 ± I 1L1 XI
4 .
JCJ. U).,'ii,CV
uaL'I ()ci_vaioiiic lA.ita Center (IjOii/0
VcU jueruilt li livcriiity
oiat'l Marine Fisheries Service (i>JQAA)
Virginia Institute of liarine Sci., caisortiu.i
iouj iiuvcuicod jijueurcii rrujeotJ .jpolicy (u'£*anay)
\Jbcxit> i«oxu Lisitituciui of Ocuancxjru^iy
vjllxf eO«X-iL 1 ij^'uXXJ Lci. • O^iitor (ULj( a-j)
uitixverh^ij* of wca.xi.oi.1 ijliIf octii iJieyo , ^ ^*
.itoKiic i-iiercjy Cu.i.LLo^ion
Soil CoiiiiorvaLiaii L^ca/viei-
^jat'l uen. u iitj.iULi^ioric in.li.i. (iju/u'i)
i\uto. uata l'roceboiiuj, un (Uv) Water i;e.iourcos
University of California, /ukjoIos, U\
LkAl~L (LPii)
Wutor yuoiity lmLl'Ii rrucejtiinrj (UPA)
University of California, beri.eluy, Ca
ili sources ijjency - ijojjt. of navigation and Oai.
u(XXJ i.Jat'1 Vucn'l Service (i/i'IS) (ljukA)
U. of So. Calif., Scuooi of Public iiota.,
iiur. of St*jrts, Fisheries u Wildlife
Coastal Uicjry lijscurcu Ceiiter (C^ilC) (00^)
VJtiter Protjrcu.ti, i^vliod Yecnnology (LT'/O
Wat'i uxi^uter System, uat'l i)
'xb*at» Wai-er Quality lioarci, lJayu and Lctuariea
'Aicn'l Data and Info branch (L1PA)
ivrgomie nat'l itesearcu xiiijrary Great .uikes
Off. of Water uata Coordination Cat. of (USGb)
13
102
9
103
A-0
lo-;
l i w.'
Jl
54
3
74
Ocamerx.)
Parker
Pearce
Pleasants
i^uocjrLo
S«jU->iL>
Sauer
k>Ci 11 iexciu r
Sciiocn
Cillii.ian
Lii.iitn
Snov/
JG Synder
ul» xc'^XUi.
CI x'iior^ju
¦J'j vwiss
7C Twitoiieil
10 Urbac±i
100 Van Arauol
40 \ ialker
28 t<en
GO Wastler
41 Whetstone
42 llietstone
Uo Unittington
G2 Wirtn
i>5 Zaiciiiel:
45.1 x^uigforxi
TABLE C-3
C-13
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Forest Service
DB-1
SPONSOR: Dept. of Agriculture
US Forest Service
Washington, DC 20250
Asst. Deputy, Chief of Research
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. John Barber
(Name)
(202)388-7076
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
OATA BASE CONTENT.
(File titles)
(1) Forest protection
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-14
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Soil Conservation Service
DB-2
SPONSOR: Dept. of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
14th St. and Independence Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20250
Asst. Director, Resources Development Div.
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Minott Silliman
(Name)
OATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Flood run off
(2)
(3)
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(202)388-4554
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
SCOPE OF DATA: National JC| regional ~ state ~
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-15
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
DB-3
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bldg. No. 5, Room 1018, MR-2
Rockville, MD 20852
Chief, Living Marine Resources Div.
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Roland F. Smith
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(301)496-8471
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
{File titles)
(1) Coastal Zone Marine Resources (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National 6 regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Dr. Smith is a ICMAREP member, Dept. of Commerce, Sub-committee
Marine Baseline Monitoring (SC/MBM)
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-16
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Environmental Data Service
DB-4
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Data Service
8060 13th Street
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Director
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr- Tom Austin (310)495-2410
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(D Environmental Data W
(2) Long Range Planning (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~ other International
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Conducting International and National Water Data Retrieval System
Network Planning.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-17
-------
DATA BANK NAMB Environmental Index (ENDEX)
DB-5
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Data Service
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Staff Consultant
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Richard Morris
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(301)495-2415
(Telephone)
Pesticide*
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Environmental
(2)
(3)
Index (ENDEX)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional ~ state ~
other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: ENDEX is being developed a
NOAA literature.
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
a referral retrieval system for all
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-18
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Climatic Center
DB-6
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Data Service
Asheville, NC 28801
Director, National Climatic Center
PERSON CONTACTEO: Mr. William H. Haggard
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(Telephone)
704-254-0961
Pesticides
Noise
Other Weather records
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
<1) Climatic publications
(2) Major climatic studies
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional n
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
state ~ other International
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-19
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Oceanic and Atmospheric Scientific
DB-7
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Data Service, Marine Services
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Staff Consultant
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Richard Morris (301)495-2415
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Planning a network of info Centers (OASIS)
(2)Environmental Index (ENDEX) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
Narrative
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: OASIS is being developed as a network of information centers,
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-20
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI)
DB-8
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
Environmental Data Service
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Staff Consultant
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Richard Morris
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(301)495-2415
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
OATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Bibliographic listing
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National [? regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
(4)
(5)
(6)
Qualitative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Othors
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: ®DI is being developed to provide reference bibliography retrieval
data under the OASIS information system.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-2 1
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Marine Fisheries Service
DB-9
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sandy Hook Sport Fisheries Marine Laboratory
Highlands, N.J. 07732
Director, Sandy Hook Marine Laboratory
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Jack B> Pearce
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(13 Sewage Sludge Dumping
(2) Shellfish pollution
(3) New York Bight monitoring
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(201)872.0200
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(A)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
SCOPE OF DATA: National E regional ~ state ~
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-22
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Lake Survey Center
DB-10
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Ocean Survey, Lake Survey Center
630 Federal Bldg
Detroit, MI 48226
Staff, Technical Pubs.
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. j0hn E. Hanna (313)226-6119
(Name) v '(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Support to COE (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National Kl regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
G-23
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Ocean Survey
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
6001 Executive Blvd.
Rockville, MD 20852
Chief, Oceanographic Division, National Ocean Survey
PERSON CONTACTED: Cdr. R. L. Swanson (301)496-8274
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Thermal mapping (4)
(2) Tide data (5)
(3) Current data (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional S state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
DB-11
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-24
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Weather Service
DB-12
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Weather Service, Room 1318
8060 13th Street
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Staff, Communications Division
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. James R. Neilon
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT;
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Long range planning
(2) Priorities in monitoring
(3)
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
(301)495-2369
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
Mr. Neilon is a ICMAREP member, Dept. of Commerce, Task Group
Collection, Exchange and Dissemination of Data
SCOPE OF DATA: National g regional ~ state ~
C-25
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Oceanographlc Data Center (NODC)
DB-13
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC)
Rockville, MD 20852
Acting Director
(202)433-2249
(Telephone)
person CONTACTED: nr. Robert V. Ochinero
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
M) Sea water properties (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _ X
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description X
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals X
Others
REMARKS: Collection, processing, and dissemination of near store data;
such as, geological, biological
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-26
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Oceanographic Data Center - Archive Data Bank DB-14
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center
Rockville, MD 20852
Staff, Data Service
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. George Heimerdinger
(Name)
<202WfeS.V
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(D Archive Data Bank W
(2) Sea water characteristics
(3) («)
SCOPE OF DATA: National B regional a state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Water quality factors:
nitrates, silicates, salinity
DO, total phosphates, pH,
temperature
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _ X
Machine readable ^
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals X
Others
REMARKS: Geographic location retrieval by one degree or ten degree marsden
squares.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-27
-------
DATA BANK NAME: NODC - National Marine Data Base Directory DB-15
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center
Rockville, MD 20852
Staff, Data Service
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr, George Heimerdinger (202)426-9044
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) National Marine Data Base Directory (4)
(2) under development (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National 0 regional ~ state D other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-28
-------
DATA BANK NAME: NODC - Accessions Production Inventory System
DB-16
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center
Rockville, MD 20852
Staff, Data Service
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. George Heimerdinger
(Name)
(202)426-9044
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Accessions Production Inventory Syste^
(2) 15)
(3) («
SCOPE OF DATA: National g| regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
state ~
other
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-29
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Oceanographic Data Center - Coastal Zone Data
DB-17
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center
Rockville, MD 20852
Staff, Services Division
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Albert Barjeski
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wattes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Coastal Zone Data
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(202)426-9044
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
regional ~ state ~
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-30
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
DB-18
SPONSOR; Dept. of Commerce
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Va 22151
Deputy Director, National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
PERSON CONTACTED: Peter F. Urbach
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(703)321-8572
(T elephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1)Environmental literature (4)
(2) clearinghouse (5)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National $ regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-31
-------
DATA BANK NAME: World Data Center A, Oceanography
DB-
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
National Oceanographlc and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanographic Data Center
Rockville, MD 20852
Director, Oceanography Services Division
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. W. L. Molo
(Name)
(202)426-9052
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1)Observations of Internat'l Research (4)
(2) Vessels (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
state ~ other Internat'l
Quantative
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others Internat'l data exchang
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-32
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Population and Industrial Density Trends DB-20
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
Bureau of the Census
Data User Services Division
Washington, DC 20233
Staff Assistant, Central Users' Service
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Robert L. Gignilliat
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(301)735-2000 Ex. 7465
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other Population and industrial data
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Population, national (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Fjles being developed; availability schedule.)
C-33
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Defense Departmental Planning DB-
SPONSOR: Dept. of Defense
Environmental Services Division
Pentagon, Room 1B682
Washington, DC 20301
Asst. Sec. of Defense, Health and Environment
PERSON CONTACTED: John R. Busterud
(Name)
(202) 0X5-3010
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Environmental Data (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Developing U.S. Navy environmental data requirements.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-34
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Air Force - Surgeon General
DB-22
SPONSOR: U.S. Air Force
Office of the Surgeon General, AF-SGP-AAP
Forrestal Bldg.
Washington, DC 20314
Sewer Staff Biologist, Environmental Engineer
PERSON CONTACTED:
LCOL 0. H. Kittilstad
(Name)
(202)693-5775
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) U.S. Air Force Water Data Standard
(2) U.S. A.F air data
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National B regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Developing a Pollution Data Retrieval System
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing techniques for Data Collection analysis and Processing.
Coordination of water data and air quality data, and comparison
with state standards.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-35
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Air Force, Pollution Data Retrieval System
DB-23
SPONSOR: U.S. Air Force
HQS
AF/PRW, Rra. 5D1018
Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330
Assistant for Weather
PERSON CONTACTED: LCOL Salvatore R.
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes
LeMole
(202)0X7-1147
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Environmental Data
(2) Pollution abatement
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
Coordination of all environmental data for the U.S. Air Force.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-36
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Air Force, Environmental Lab
DB-24
SPONSOR: U.S. Air Force
Environmental Laboratory
Wright Patterson, Ohio 45433
Staff, Radiological Health Laboratory
PERSON CONTACTED: Major George Kush
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(513)257-6672
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(UWater Quality data (*)
(2)Air quality data 15)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National [J regional ~ state ~ other
OATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others USAF coastal sewage treatment data is provided to EPA data file.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING OATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing a Pollution Data Retrieval System in which state
standards will be compared to monitored data.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-37
-------
OATA BANK NAME: U.S. Air Force - Water and Air Quality Data Coordination DB-25
SPONSOR: U.S. Air Force
Wright Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton, OH 45433
Staff, Radiological Health Lab.
PERSON CONTACTED:
Captain William Bartlett
(Name)
(513)257-6672
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Data
(2) Air Quality Data
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National JS regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS ANO TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
state ~
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X V plotting _
EXISTING OATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrieval*
Others
REMARKS: Water Quality Data is provided from Kelly AFB, and Air Quality
Data from McClellan AFB.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-38
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET)
DB-26
SPONSOR: Dept. of Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency
1400 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22209
Director, Information Processing Techniques
(202)694-5921
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Lawrence G. Roberts
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other X Wide range of data
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Computer sharing and message transmittal)
(2) Data Base Sharing (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National [Xj regional ~ state ~ other
Over 24 computer centers from coast to coast are interfaced.
OATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors X
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval x
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems X Accessibility X
Others Supervised HOST data entry and multiple exit point.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting _
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Current development of a message switching communication network
with interface with UCLA, UCSB, USC, NOAA-NWS, SRI, to name only
a few.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-39
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Army
DB-27
SPONSOR: Dept. of Defense
U.S. Army HQS Data Processing and Tech.
Building E2100
Edgewood Arsenal, MD 21020
Lt.Col. U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency
PERSON CONTACTED:
Lt.Col. Roy Garman
(Name)
(201)671-3353
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality data
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
other
Quantative
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing an Army wide water quality monitoring system.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-40
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC)
DB-28
SPONSOR: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Coastal Engineering Research Center
5201 Little Falls Road, NW
Washington, DC 20314
Data Base, Supervisor
(202)282-2558
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Ronald Walten
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water quality (4)
(2) Maintains WQ data from (372) stations (5)
(3) Special Chesapeake Bay data (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional ~ state O other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting_ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Provides water quality monitoring data to EPA STORET file.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-41
-------
DATA BANK NAME: New England Automatic Hydrologic Network
DB-29
SPONSOR: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Reservoir Control Center
Waltham, MA 02154
Manager
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. Sol Cooper
(Name)
(617)894-2400 Ex. 627
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wattes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(t) Water quality
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional 0
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
state ~ other
(4)
(5)
(6)
Several New England states
share 5 common drainage
basins.
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing an automatic hydrologic remote radio monitoring network.
The network has 41 remote reporting stations, 5 remote recording
stations and a central control station at Div, HQS
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-42
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Great Lakes Study DB-30
SPONSOR: U.S. Amy
Corps of Engineers
219 S. Dearborne Street
Chicago, IL 60604
Staff, Regional and Long Range Planning
PERSON CONTACTED: Lt. Paul H. Blankenship (312)353-7516
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other See below
OATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Harbor Dredging
(2) Soil Disposal
(3) Water Quality data
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional state ~
(4) RAPP Discharge Permit Control
(5) Point Source Research
(6) Waste Water mgt.
other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-43
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Navy - Naval Operations
DB-31
SPONSOR: U.S. Navy
Office of the Oceanographer of the Navy
732 N. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Capt., U.S. Navy
(202)69»°.§.)
PERSON CONTACTED: CAPT W. F. Reed
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~ other International
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: CAPT Reed is on the ICMAREP, Sub-committee Marine Baseline
Monitoring (SC/MBM)
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-44
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Navy - Environmental Protection Data Base DB-32
SPONSOR: U.S. Navy
Navy Environmental Protection Group, OP-45
Pentagon
Washington, DC 20350
CDR CEC USN
PERSON CONTACTED: CDR. J. A. D'Emidio (202)0X7-3639
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data X Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Data (4)
(2) Air Quality Data (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National [? regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Teitual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Developing an environmental data center.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-45-
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U.S. Navy - Environmental Quality Requirements
DB-33
SPONSOR: U.S. Navy
Environmental Quality
732 N. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
LCDR. USN
(503)378-3732
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Neise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
PERSON CONTACTED^cdr Lawrence Riley
(Name)
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(U Water Quality Data ^
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National jj] regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Member of the ICMAREP, Sub-Committee on Marine Baseline Monitoring
(SC/MBM); developing interface U.S. Navy monitoring requirements.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-46
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Naval Weather Service
DB-34
SPONSOR: U.S. Navy
Naval Weather Service Command, HQS
Washington Navy Yard, Bldg. 200
Washington, DC 20242
LCDR, Asst. CDR, Command Operations, USN
(202)433-3950
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: LCDR R. G. Kirk
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other Weather
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Weather data W)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-47
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Marine Corps - Natural Resource Management Program
DB-35
SPONSOR:
PERSON CONTACTED:
U.S. Navy
Marine Corps
Donata Bldg. Rm. 705
1925 N. Lynn Street
Arlington, VA 22209
Civil_ Engineer
Mr. James M. Kearns Jr.
(Name)
<202)o%m.>
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wattes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(!) Water Quality Data
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National CX regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE;
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing the USMC environmental data base requirements.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-48
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Institute of Health
DB-36
SPONSOR: Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare
National Institute of Health
8600 Rockville
Bethesda, MD 20014
Director, Toxicology Information Program
PERSON CONTACTED:
Dr. Henry M. Kissman
(Name)
(301)496-3147
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Heavy metals in water (4)
(2) Dangerous and toxic metals in water (5)
(3) Mercury and lead in water resources (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National £) regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Can respond to data searches for unique and toxic metals in water.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Various levels of resource computer sharing being planned with
EPA, USGS and others.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-49
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System (MED LARS) DB-37
SPONSOR: Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare
National Institure of Health
8600 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20014
Director, National Library of Medicine
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Clifford A. B®chrach
(Name)
(301)496-6217
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Public health (4)
(2) Water pollution (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional n state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others Wide range of public
health consideration
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Clearinghouse for literature search requests.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-50
-------
OATA BANK NAME: Office of Environmental Planniiig
DB-38
SPONSOR: Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
Office of General Services
Asst. Secretary for Administration
7th and D Streets, SW
Washington, DC 20410
Director, Housing and Urban Development Library
PERSON CONTACTED: Mrs.
Elsa S. Freeman
(Name)
(202)755-6376
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other Pollution considerations
in urban development
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Environment and the community
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional n state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-51
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Bureau of Reclamation
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Bureau of Reclamation
Washington, DC 20240
Data Base, Manager
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. James D. Elli
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
e (202)343-5226
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Data (4)
(2) Land Management Data (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National g regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: A portion of this data base is provided to the EPA STORET file.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-52
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife
DB-40
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife
Washington, DC 20426
Mgr., Division of River Basins Project
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Earl Walker
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(202)343-4442
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Data (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National $ regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-53
-------
DB-41
DATA BANK NAME: Geological Survey - Water Resources, National Computer Network
SPONSOR: Dept. of the Interior, Water Resources Div.
U.S. Geological Survey, Rm. 2227, GSA Bldg.
18th and E NW
Washington, DC 20240
Assistant Chief Hydrologist
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. George W. Whetstone
(Name)
<202>3W«»)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Data
(2) Administrative applications
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National B regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
(4)
(5)
(6)
Quantative X Wide range of parameters Narrative x Wat Quality Data
Abstract/Textual r * ata
_ . . Coordination
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X Approximately (50) terminals
Correspondence request for search only x
On-line systems X Accessibility
Others Complete system supports 4 regional offices and 50 district
offices.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out x Machine readable X
High speed print-out x CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape X CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description X Software programs
Operators handbook X Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Mr. Whetstone is an ICMAREP member, and the Sub-committee on Marine
Baseline Monitoring (SC/MBM) . Chairman of the Data Handling Work
Group of the USGS office of Water Data Coordination.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-54
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Geological Survey - National Water Data Exchange (NAWDEX) DB-42
SPONSOR: Dept. of the Interior, Water Resources Div.
U.S. Geological Survey, Rm. 2227, GSA Bldg.
18th and E NW
Washington, DC 20240
Assistant Chief Hydrologist
PERSON CONTACTED: _ George W. Whetstone
(Name)
(202)34W^„()
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
{File titles)
(1) NAWDEX, under development
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National B regional n state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request lor search only ^
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE;
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: A Federal Interagency Water Data Handling Work Group consisting
of a wide membership of federal agencies is developing system
design requirements for national handling of water data.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-55
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Earth Resources Observation Systems (EROS)
DB-43
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
EROS Data Center
Earth Resources Observation Systems Satellite
Sioux Falls, SD 57101
Chief of Data Management Branch
(605)339-2270
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Bill Campbell
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Aerial surveillance monitoring (4)
(2) Thermal discharge images (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~ other International
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Multiple spectrum photography Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Photographic files are currently being developed by the Data Center.
At present, the requestal must identify the flight path and photo-
graphic frames desired.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-56
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Earth Resources Technological Satellite (ERTS A and B) DB-44
SPONSOR: National Space and Aernautical Administration
Manned Space Center, TF-53
Houston, TX 77058
Deputy Chief, Earth Resources
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Dean Brat ton
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Oata
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(713)483-4948
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) IR detection of heavy concentrations o^[4)
(2) phosphates and nutrients. (5)
OjAlgae blooms (8)
SCOPE OF DATA: National r? regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Thermal discharge photography Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only ^
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: T^e Geological Survey plans
available in early 1973.
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
subscribe to photographic findings
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-57
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Gulf Coast Hydro Science Center
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Geological Survey
Gulf Coast Hydro Science Center
NASA, Mississippi Test Facility
Bay St. Louis, MS 39520
Chi ef
TRSON CONTACTED: Mr> Stanley P. Sauer (601)688-4720
(Namt, (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
Tampa Ray Study Project W
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National f] regional QJ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request (or search only
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
DB-45
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-58
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Catalog of Information on Water Data
DB-45.1
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Geological Survey
Office of Water Data Coordination, Room 102
2100 M Street, NW
Washington, DC 20242
Chief, Office of Water Data Coordination
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. R. H. Langford (202)343-8565
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Catalog of information about water W
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National # regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others Selected magnetic
to users.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting _
Accessibility
tape and retrievals provided upon request
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others Four catalogs
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others Four catalogs
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: There are (4) catalogs "Water Quality", "Surface Water", "Ground
Water", "Aerial Investigations". There are matching maps with
monitoring station locations.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-59
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Office of Water Resources Research - Water Resources DB-46
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Office of Water Resources Research
19th and C Streets, NW
Washington, DC
Director of the Office of Water Resources Research (OWRR)
PERSON CONTACTEDDr. H. Garland Hershey (202)343-5975
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(t) Water quality literature (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National [3 regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XV plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Sponsoring the development of the Generalized Information Processing
System (GIPSY)
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-60
-------
DB-47
DATA BANK NAME: Dept. of Interior - Generalized Information Processing System
(GIPSY)
SPONSOR: Dept. of Interior
Office of Water Resources Research
Washington, DC 20204
Mgr., Water Resources Scientific Information Center
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr.
Ray A. Jensen
(Name)
(202)343-8435
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Literature
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National cK regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing a computer assisted resource data retrieval system in
cooperation with the U. of Oklahoma, U. of Wisconsin, Cornell, and
U. of North Carolina.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-61
-------
DATA BANK NAME: GIPSY Network Manager
SPONSOR: U. of Oklahoma
1610 Newton Drive
Oklahoma 73009
Project Director
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Larry Greenwell
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(405)325-7234
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality literature (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: When complete, this will be an on-line literature bibliography
inquiry clearinghouse system.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-62
-------
DATA BANK NAME: National Park Service
SPONSOR: Dept. of the Interior
National Park Service
Washington, DC 20240
Chief, Water Resources Division
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Manual Morris
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(202)343-3951
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Park Conservation W)
(2) Thermal discharge impact studies (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National CK regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: A special thermal dispersal study entitled "Hydro Study of Biscayne
Bay, Miami" has been completed.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-63
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Coast Guard
SPONSOR: Dept. of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard, DAT-3/62
400 7th Street SW
Washington, DC 20590
LCDR., Applied Technology
PERSON CONTACTED: LCDR. John E. Lindak
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
DB-50
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
other Areas of concern - Atlantic
Coast, Gulf Coast, and Pacific
Coast.
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Marine environmental parameter
(2)
(3)
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-64
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Chemical Hazardous Spill Response System (CRIS)
DB-51
SPONSOR: Dept. of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard, HQS, Room 6201
400 - 7th SW
Washington, DC 20591
Asst. Chief, Applied Technology Division
PERSON CONTACTED: CDR Charles Glass
(Name)
(202)426-1008
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Coastal Zone Pollution Baselines
(2) Monitoring Pollution
(3) On scene oil spill clean up managers
SCOPE OF DATA: National £) regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
(4)Wide range of pollution
(5) detection studies
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing coast guard quick response clear up manager teams.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-65
-------
OATA BANK NAME: Marine Environmental Protection Program
DB-52
SPONSOR: Dept. of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard, HQS
400 7th St. SW
Washington, DC 20591
Staff, Applied Technology Division
PERSON CONTACTED:
CDR. Robert Ketchel
(Name)
(202)426-1027
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1)Oil Spill Management
(2)Airborne surveillance
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
state ~
other
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing a real time radar and IR detection and classification
capability.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-66
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Oil Spill Clean Up Management
DB-53
SPONSORt Dept. of Transportation
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant, WEP
400 7th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590
Staff, Commandant
PERSON CONTACTED: CDR. D. B. Charter
(Name)
(202)426-9573
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Oil Spill on scene management
(2) Clem Up
(3) Oil Spill enforcement
SCOPE OF DATA: National [if regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
(4) Oil separation equipment
(5) evaluation
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Developing pollution detection systems. Developing jurisdictional
lines of clean up management with EPA.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-67
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Atomic Energy Commission
DB-
SPONSOR: Atomic Energy Commission
Washington, DC 20240
Data Base, Manager
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. A. A. Schoen
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation X
Solid Wastes
(202)973-4585
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality (4)
(2) Thermal discharge (5)
(3) Reactor systems (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National £] regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Water Quality parameters Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X Special requests honored.
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting _
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: AEC and USGS maintain high level of data exchange and cooperation
with EPA and water quality STORET file.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-68
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Argonne National Research Library
DB-55
SPONSOR:
oiaii,
PERSON CONTACTED:
Atomic Energy Commission
Argonne National Research Library
Central Library
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, 111 60439
Staff, Central Library
Mr. Norman Zaichick
(Name)
(312)739-7711, X7711 &
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
m Thermal pollution studies
(2) Thermal pollution of the Great Lakes
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional g state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative
(4)
(5)
(6)
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Clearinghouse of literature search.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-69
-------
OATA BANK NAME: Ecological Information and Analysis Center
Atomic Energy Commission
SPONSOR. Battelle Memorial Institute
Columbus Laboratories
500 King Avenue
Columbus, OH 4
Director, Ecological Info, and Analysis Center (EIAC)
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Thomas F. Carroll
(Name)
DB-
(614)299-3151
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Neise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water quality studies
(2) Estuary Survey
(3) Water Quality monitoring
M) Water Quality Standards
(3)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National BJ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
other
Quantative
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others clearinghouse for
literature searches
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: In cooperation with EPA on developing water quality monitoring
specifications and standards.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-70
-------
DATA BANK NAME:Oak Ridge National Laboratory
DB-57
SPONSOR: Atomic Energy Commission
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ecological Sciences Division, Bldg. 2001
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Director, Data Bank
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Stanley I. Auerbach (615)483-8611
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape X CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Provides water quality characteristics monitoring data to EPA
for special utility data file.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-71
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Environmental Information System
DB-58
SPONSOR: Atomic Energy Commission
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Environmental Information System
Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Coordinator, Batch searches
PERSON CONTACTEDMrs.
Gloria Caton
(Name)
(615)483-8611
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water quality
(2)Thermal discharge
(3)Misc. pollution studies
SCOPE OF DATA: National regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
state ~
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Provides source data to EPA Mead Data Central file
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-72
-------
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Solid Waste Management Program (SWIRS)
DB-59
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Technical Information Office
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20852
Director, Office of Solid Waste Management Program
PERSON CONTACTED: n
Mr. John A. Connolly
(Name)
(301)443-1824
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes X
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Solid Waste Information
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
(4)
(5)
(G)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others Literature searches
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-73
-------
DB-60
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Office of Water Programs, Marine Baseline Planning
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs
Division of Applied Technology
Crystal Mall, Bldg. 2, Room 906
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, Water Quality Protection Branch
PERSON CONTACTED: x< Allen Wastler (703)557-7634
(Name) ^Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Municipal Sewage Treatment Waste
(2) Water Quality- STORET
(3) Industrial Discharge Points
charge
Dis- (4) Construction Contract Grants
(5) Fish Kill
(6) Beach Closure
SCOPE OF DATA: National § regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA;
Quantative X Narrative X
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X TSO
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems X
Others
System (Time Sharing Option)
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting X
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Mr. Wastler is chairman of the Interagency committee for Marine
Environmental Prediction (ICMAREP) Sub-Committee Marine Baselines
and Monitoring (SC/MBM).
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-74
-------
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Water Quality Protection - Data Processing
DB-61
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs
Applied Technology Division
Crystal Mall, Bldg. 2, Room 906
Arlington, VA 20242
Supervisor, Water Quality Data Processing
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Paul Thorpe (703)557-6024
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation X Other
Solid Wastes X
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) National Estuarine Inventory (NEI) M)
(2) Dun and Bradstreet file (5)
(3)0ffice of Water Data Coordination - (6)
Dept. of Interior (OWDC)
SCOPE OF DATA: National 3 regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others Provides data resources:
USGS, Bureau of Census,
and others.
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readablex
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape X CRT graphic displays
XY plotting. X Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Provides the data processing support of the EPA computer systems.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-75
-------
DB-62
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Technical Data and Information Branch, National Water File
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs
Applied Technology Division
Crystal Mall, Bldg. 2, Room 923
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, Technical Data and Information Branch
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. George F. Wirth
(Name)
(703)557-7446
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation X
Solid Wastes X
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality properties (STORET) ^'Construction Contract Grants
(2) Municipal Waste Discharge <5>Fish Kill
(3) Industrial Discharge Points (6) State, County boundaries
with overlay of sewage
SCOPE OF DATA: National [%. regional ~ state ~ other treatment.
There are over 130 terminals in the EPA system from coast to
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA: coast.
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X TSO System (Time Sharing Option)
Correspondence request for search only option of the requestor.
On-Line systems X
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _
X
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display being evaluated
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description X
Operators handbook X
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Under development: River Mapping Index (RMI)-AUTOMAP; Refuse Act
Permit Plan (RAPP); Thermal discharge points; Water quality standards
and specifications.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C- 76
-------
DB-63
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Networks and Surveillance , Special System Planning
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs
Applied Technology Division
Crystal Mall Building 2, Room 919
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, Networks & Surveillance Section
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Robert Horn (703)557-2491
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Surveillance Systems
(2) Communication Networks
(3) Special Reports
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
(4) Special EPA application
(5) TIMS file
(6) NETS file
~ other
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval TSO System ( Time Sharing Option)
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems X Accessibility
Others Maintains administrative data file from Mead Data Central.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting X
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display X under
CRT graphic displays evaluation
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Conducting assessment of aerial surveillance techniques.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-77
-------
DATA BANK NAME: EPA Water Quality File - STORET
DB-64
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs
Applied Technology Division
Crystal Mall, Building 2, Room 211
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, STORET Assistance Section
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. C. Sam Conger
(Name)
(703)557-1580
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Water Quality
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality file - STORET (4)
(2) Water Quality Training Handbook (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National B regional S state K3 other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Inland and coastal water
quality properties - physical,
chemical and biological.
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X TSO System (Time Sharing Option)
Correspondence request for search only Option of the requestor.
On-Line systems X Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
XY plotting_X at the EPA central
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
computer Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description X Software programs
Operators handbook X Demonstration retrievals X
System configuration Others Recent software changes
Retrieval routines X have resulted in plans to revise
the existing operators handbook.
REMARKS: Existing heavy STORET user retrieval demands and the resultant backlogs
have reduced quick response terminal retrievals. Many STORET users
request remote batch entry retrievals, and receive subsequent high
(Files being developed; availability schedule.) speed print out at the system center.
C- 78
-------
DATA BANK NAME: EPA - Refuse Act Permit File (RAPP)
DB-65
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs, Applied Technology Div.
Crystal Mall, Bldg. 2, Room 291
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, Data and Information Services
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Jesse L . Lewis
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation X Other Thermal levels
Solid Wastes
(703)557-7637
(Telephone)
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(URefuse Act Permit file (RAPP)
(2)Thermal discharge file
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National S regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X TSO System (Time Sharing Option)
Correspondence request for search X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting X
Machine readable A
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING OATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:Thermal discharge data and Refuse Permit Data is being prepared for
TSO system file creation
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-79
-------
DATA BANK NAME: EPA Municipal and Industrial Discharge Data Div. DB-66
SPONSOR: Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Programs, Applied Technology
Crystal Mall, Bldg. 2
Arlington, VA 20460
Chief, Data Operations and Service
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Phillip L. Taylor
(Name)
(703)557-3490
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Municipal Sewage Treatment Data
W) Industrial discharge data
(3) AUTO MAP
SCOPE OP DATA: National d regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
(4)
(5)
(S)
Quantatlve x
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval x Uses TSO system
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems x Accessibility
Other*
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out x
High speed print-out x
Magnetic tape x
X Y plotting X
Machine readable x
CRT alpha numeric dlspley
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: AUTOMAP is under development to provide digitized river bank locations
per River Mileage Index and geographically plot state, county and
river basin lines with overlay of discharge data.
(Files being developedi availability schedule.)
C-80
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Council on Environmental Quality
DB-67
SPONSOR: Executive Office of the President
Council on Environmental Quality
722 Jackson Place, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Staff
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr.
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Robert Cahn
(Name)
(202)382-6275
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other Full range of numerous
environments
~ATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Annual Reports provide wide view of
(2) numerous programs
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National $ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-81
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Federal Power Commission
DB-68
SPONSOR: Federal Power Commission
Bureau of Power
443 G. NW
Washington, DC 20426
Program Mgr. , Environmental Analysis
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. Alex Gakner
(Name)
(202)382-2369
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation X
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Power Plant Data
(2) Thermal discharge data source
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National IS regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Applications for Power Plant operation are forwarded to EPA
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-82
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Smithsonian Center for Short-Lived Phenomena
DB-69
SPONSOR: Office of Environmental Sciences
Smithsonian Institution
60 Garden Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Director, Center for Short-Lived Phenomena
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Robert Citron (617)864-7911
(Name) (Telephona)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other A wide range of environmental
Solid Wastes data.
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(DComplete descriptions of natural disastd4s
(2) (S)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National 0 regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-83
-------
DATA BANK NAME. canforn£a Water Resources Control Board DB-70
DB-71
SPONSOR: ^ tic
State of California
California Water Resources Control Board
1416 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Chief, Planning and Research Division
PERSON CONTACTED: , _ ,
Mr. Robe^^is C916)44,^^e)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources
(2) Environmental Impact Statement
(3) Aerial photo surveillance
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state K]
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
W 15 current research programs
(5) San Francisco Bay, Study
(6) Report
other
Quantative Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems X
Others California Computer System
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting _
Accessibility
includes Sacramento and Los Angeles.
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-84
-------
DATA BANK NAME: California - Monterey Basin Pilot Study
DB-72
SPONSOR: State of California
State Water Resources Control Board
1416 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
PERSON CONTACTED:
Dr. Melvin E. Holland
(Name)
(916)445-7765
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Monterey Basin Marine Environmental Dat44)
(2) Coordination of numerous federal and (5)
(3) state agencies. (B)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state K other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY.
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Study to determine monitoring design requirements in Monterey
Basin
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Mr* Holland is Chairman of the Data Management Committee
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-85
-------
DATA BANK NAME: State of California - Data Processing System DB-
SPONSOR: State of California
Dept. of Water Resources
Sacramento, CA 95814
Director, Data Processing
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Robert McDonnell
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(916)445-2296
(T elephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other Numerous other geographical
and economic characteristics
DATA BASE CONTENT: Misc. files related to:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources (4)
(2) Projected needs (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~ state X other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems X Accessibility
OthersData Processing linkage from Sacramento to Los Angeles
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
X Y plotting X
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Evaluating data resource and computer sharing networks.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C- 86
-------
DATA BANK NAME- State California - Los Angeles Data Center
DB-74
SPONSOR:
PERSON CONTACTED:
State of California
Water Resources Control Board
909 S. Broadway Street
Los Angeles, CA 90055
Supervisor, Machine Processing Section
Mr. Glen Snow
(Name)
(213)620-4720
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles) Misc. files related to:
(1)Water Resources
(2) Projected needs
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
(4)
(5)
(8)
other
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems X Accessibility
Others Operates a Water Quality data retrieval and report system.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out X
High speed print-out X
Magnetic tape X
XY plotting _ X
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable X
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-87
-------
DB-75
DATA BANK NAME: California Advisory Commission on Marine and Coastal Resources
(CMC)
SPONSOR: State of California
Union Bank Square
445 S. Figueroa Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Chairman
Member - Nossaman, Waters, Scott, Krueger and Riordan
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. Robert Krueger
(Name)
(213)628-5221
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other Land use factors
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1)Marine resources
(2) Land resources
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
state JO other
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Policy agency of State government
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-88
-------
DATA BANK NAME: California Comprehensive Ocean Area Plan (COAP)
DB-76
SPONSOR: State of California Resources Agency
Department of Navigation and Ocean Development
California Comprehensive Ocean Area Plan
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1336
Sacramento, California 95814
Civil Engineer - Conservation
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Glenn R. Twitchell (916)445-0530
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(D Water Resources Data W
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state IS other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
Hist) speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-89
-------
DATA BANK NAME: California Fish and Game
SPONSOR: State of California
Dept. of Fish and Game
1416 9th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Program Mgr., Water Quality Planning
(916)445-3531
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Leonard 0. Fisk
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes X
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(t)Drainage basin projects (16) W)
(2)Water quality resources
{3) Sol id Waste Management
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state £] other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal printout Machine readaWa
High speed print-out CRT a|Pha numwic dis»,a*
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting other*
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
DB-77
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-90
-------
DATA BANK NAME: State of California - Testing Lab Certification
DB-78
SPONSOR: California State Department of Public Health
Sanitation and Radiation Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way
Berkeley, CA 947
Chief, Water Laboratory Consultant
(415)843-7900, X495
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Nathen Moskowitz
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
H)Water Quality Standards ^
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~ state 0 other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Provides water quality testing laboratory certification
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Maintains water quality testing equipment and instrument calibration
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-91
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
DB-79
SPONSOR: Southern California Assn. of Governments
1111 West 6th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Deputy Director of Planning
PERSON CONTACTED:Mr. Frank Hotchkiss
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources
(2)
(3)
Qualitative
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
REMARKS:
(213)481-0095
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
other Consortium counties in
Southern California
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-92
-------
DB-80
DATA BANK NAME: Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
SPONSOR:Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
1100 G1endon Avenue
Los Angeles CA 90024
Project Mgr. So. Calif Coastal Water Research Project
PERSON CONTACTED: j)r> George E. Hlavka
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(213)478-0808
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality Monitoring
(2) (5)
(3) I®)
SCOPE OF DATA: National a regional K3 state ~ other
Southern California coast (Consortium of several counties)
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS; Conducting water miality monitoring and modeling trends In levels
of pollution
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-93
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Los Angeles - Ocean Economics DB-81
SPONSOR: Los Angeles, Chamber of Commerce
Ocean Economic Committee
c/o California Production Services Corp.
19431 S. Santa Fe, P.O. Box 4489
Compton, CA 90224
Chairman, Model Coastal Zone Development Bill
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Robert D. Hillman (213)636-9855
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other Land Use
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
0) Coastal Resources
(2) Environmental Research
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National a regional E state ~ other
Southern California area
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting —
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-94
-------
data BANK NAME: Maine Information Display Analysis System (MIDAS)
DB-82
SPONSOR: State- of Maine
Dept. of Inland Fisheries & Game
State Office Building
Augusta, >E 04330
Director, Planning & Coordination
(207)289-3286
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED- Mr. D. K. Crist ie
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(t)Resource planning (4)
(2) Long range conservation (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional 3 state ~ other
Joint activity by State of Maine, Dept. of Interior, Geological
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA: Survey, NOAA-Marine Fisheries Service.
Qualitative X Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptor*
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Developing an inter-agency communications network and computer
resource data sharing.
(Filet being developed; availability schedule.)
C-95
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Montgomery County, Maryland - Water Quality X-Y Plotting
SPONSOR: Montgomery County, Maryland
Dept. of Health, Div. of Environmental Health Service
County Office Building
Rockville, MD 20850
Staff, Water Supply & Pollution Control
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. William McCaw
(Name)
(301)948-6446
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(DWater Quality Data
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
(4)
(5)
(6)
state ~ other County
Narrative ^
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote inquiry Terminal Retrieval x Uses EPA water data STORET file
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Utilizes EPA computer X-Y plotting services.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-96
-------
DATA BANK NAME: New York, Dept. of Environmental Conservation
DB-84
SPONSOR: State of New York
Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Division of Marine & Coastal Resources
4175 Veterans Memorial Highway
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
Director, Region I
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr_ Albert Jensen (516)585-5400
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
{File titles!
0Water Quality Data
(2) (5»
0) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state U other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative x
AbstractJTextual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-97
-------
DATA BANK NAME: North Carolina - Coastal Plains Center
DB-85
SPONSOR: North Carolina - Coastal Plains Center for Marine Development Services
P.O. Box 3643, Azalia Station
Wilmington, NC 28401
Asst. Director, INFOR Services
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr.
Harold Dubach
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(919)791-6432
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources
(2) Resources Planning
(3) Land Use
(4) Master long range planning
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
other
Quantative
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Consortium of federal and state agencies concerned with coast land
use and coastal development planning.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-98
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Oregon - Environmental Quality.
DB-86
SPONSOR: Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality
Municipal Waste Division
1234 Southwest Morrison
Portland, OR 97205
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr.
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Joe Jensen
(Nam*)
(503)229-5696
(Taloplwna)
Pesticides
Malta
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
tDWater quality - chemical analysis
(21
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state C
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantatlva X
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thosaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Othor* Water data is duplicated for the EPA water file STORET
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High spood print-out
Magnetic tape
XY plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE;
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrieval!
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-99
-------
DB-87
DATA BANK NAME: Pennsylvania - Water Quality Management Information System (WAMIS)
SPONSOR: State of Pennsylvania
Dept. of Environmental Resources
Bureau of Water Quality Mgt.
7th and Forrester, Room 902
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Staff. WAMIS Information System
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr> Floyd stanek
(Name)
(717)787-1404
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Quality data
(2)
(3)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional ~ state ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Water quality properties
(4)
(5)
(6)
other
Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems
Others Interface with EPA STORET
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Accessibility
system.
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: When completed, the network planned will tie (50) states together.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-100
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Texas Bays and Estuaries
DB-88
SPONSOR: State of Texas
Texas Water Quality Board
314 West 11th Street
Austin, Texas 78701
Director, Field Operations
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Dick Whittington (512)475-2651
(Name) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticide*
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1} Vol. 24, Bays & Estuaries W Self Reporting System
(2) Monitoring requirements: Municipal ®
(3) Sewage Effluent Treatment, and ®
Industrial Wastewater Effluents.
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state g other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Performing monitoring, pollution abatement, and using digitized
geographic plotting of basin state, and county boundaries.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-101.
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Columbia River Basin Consortium (HYDROMET)
DB-89
SPONSOR: U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Customs House
Portland, OR 97208
Chairman, Columbia River Water Mgt. Group
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr.
Ray Garza
(Nam*)
(533)221-3761
(Taiaphons)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT;
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastss
Pesticidee
NoIm
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(Fllo tltlos)
(1) Water quality properties
(2) Water flow rates
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OP DATA:
National ~ regional 0 itato ~ othar
Entire-Columbia River Basin
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantatlva
X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Llne systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Megnotie tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS: Development of a water property Data Mgt. System through consortium
of USGS, EPA Bonneville Power Admin., Forest Service, Nat'l Weather
Service, Bureau of Reclamation.
(Files being dovelopodi availability schedule.)
C-102
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Cornell University DB-90
SPONSOR: Cornell University
Langnoir Lab
Ithaca, NY 14850
Professor, Section of Ecology and Systematics.
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr.
Gene Likens
(Name)
(607)256-3498
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water DataX
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
Pesticides
Noise
Other Misc. environments
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Ecology (4)
(2) Resource Planning (5)
(3) Administrative file on Environmental (6)
Impact Statements.
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others Interface support to the Council on Environmental Quality
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-103
-------
DATA BANK NAME: New England Marine Resources Information Program DB-9L
SPONSOR; New England Marine Resources Information Program (NEMRIP)
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, Rhode Island 02881
Director
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. Valter J. Cray
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiatian
Solid Wattes
(401)792-6211
(Telephone)
Peiticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Pollution (4)
(2) Marine Resources (5)
(3) Resource Planning (g)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state rj other
Consortium of 6 states and 8 universities
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-LIni systems Accessibility
Others Clearinghouse of literature searches
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data bate description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed) availability schedule.)
C-104
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Sea Grant
DB-92
SPONSOR: Dept. of Commerce
Office of Sea Grant
801 19th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20235
Director
PERSON CONTACTED:
Mr. Robert B. Abel
(Name)
(202)343-6214
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data X
Radiation
Solid Wastes X
Pesticide*
Noise
Other Wide range of environments
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Coastal Zone Resources
(2) Marine Resource Planning
(3) Marine Science Research
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~
(4)
(5)
(8)
other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantativa X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others There are 7 Sea
grant funds.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Accessibility
Grant Universities and
20 additional with
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being devolopodi availability schedule.)
C-105
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Texas A and M University
DB-93
SPONSOR: Texas Agriculture and Mining
Dept. of Civil Engineering
Environmental Engineering Division
College Station, Texas 77843
Director, Environmental Engineering Division
(713)845-3011
(Telephone)
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr Roy w>
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation 0th#r
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
W Analytical Modeling
(2) Estuarine Water Quality Mgt.
(3) Water Resources
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state CK other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Coast zone planning
(5)
(6)
Quantative x
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Developing thermal discharge and algae nutrient identification
techniques in aerial surveillance in cooperation with NASA and
the ERTS A and B programs.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-106
-------
DATA 8ANK NAME: Gulf Universities Resrarch Consortium (GURC)
DB-94
SPONSOR: University of Houston
1611 Tremont Street
Galveston, TX 77550
Coordinator, Gulf Environmental Coordinator
PERSON CONTACTED:
Dr. E.
Alan Lohse
(Name)
(713)765-7714
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Watte*
Pesticides
Noise
Other Misc. environments.
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Marine Geology data
(2) Coastal Engineering
(3) Land Use Planning
WAerial Surveillance Techniques
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional 0 state ~ other
Entire Gulf Coast zone
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting.
EXISTING OATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS) This is a consortium of 17 universities operating in cooperation with
numerous federal and state agencies.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-107
-------
DATA BANK NAME: u. of California - Berkeley DB-95
SPONSOR: u. of California, Berkeley
Dept. of Landscape Acrictecture
Berkeley, CA 94720
Professor, Environmental Planning
PERSON CONTACTED: Robert H. Twiss
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(415)642-4022
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other Landuse
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
M Coastal Zone Planning
W Land Use modeling
(3) Lake Tahoe study
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state g other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-108
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U. of California - Los Angeles
DB-96
SPONSOR: U. of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Dept. of Engineering, Room 2066
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Director, Communications Planning
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. J. H. Snyder
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Resource Planning (*)
(2) Network communications (51
(3) (G)
SCOPE OF DATA: National & regional ~ state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems
Others Member subscriber to Dept.
search system - GIPSY
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting_X Under development
Accessibility
of Interior development of literature
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric iiiplay
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software program
Operators handbook Demonstration
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: GIPSY is to be completed March 1973.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-109
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Scripps Institution of Oceanography
DB-97
SPONSOR: University of California, San Diego
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Dept. of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences
7218 Vrey Hall, P.O. Box 109
LaJolla, CA 92037
Professor, Systems Sciences
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. Alan Schneider (714)453-1618
(Nam*) (Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Wat«r Data X Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Applied Ocean Sciences
(2) Marine Biological
(3) Marine Chemistry
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state [$
(4) Marine Geology
(5) Physical Oceanography
(6) Marine Research and Resource
Planning
other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Lino systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: There are approximately 175 graduate students in a wide range of marine
research categories. There are also 8 marine equipped research vessels.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-110
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U. of California - Santa Barbara
DB-98
SPONSOR: U. of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)
Dept. of Engineering
Professor
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. G. J. Culler
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(805)968-1813
[Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other Misc. environments
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Part of ARPANET network (4)
(2) Terminal graphic displays (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional [X state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS ANO TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X Narrative
Abstract/Textual X
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval X Developing CRT terminal systems
Correspondence request for search only
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display X
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays X
XY plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System conliguration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: Developing SIGNAL, an interactive graphical CST terminal display
time sharing system for ARPANET and the US ARPA Agency.
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-lll
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U. of Michigan - Great Lake Study
DB-99
SPONSOR: U. of Michigan
Sea Grant Office
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
Director, Sea Grant Office
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. John Armstrong
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
(313)763-1437
(Telephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources (4)
(2) Resource Planning (5)
(3) Great Lakes Studies (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National n regional 21 state ~ other
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out Machine readable
High speed print-out CRT alpha numeric display
Magnetic tape CRT graphic displays
X Y plotting _ Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: University has an engineering department capable of conducting water
ouality monitoring, modeling, trend analysis, and computer interface
with EPA.
(Files being developed; availability scheJule.)
C-112
-------
DB-100
DATA BANK NAME: University of Southern California - Population Resarch
SPONSOR: University of Southern California
School of Public Admin.
Population Research Lab.
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Director, Population Research Lab.
PERSON CONTACTED:
Dr. Maurice D. Van Arsdol
(Name)
(213)746-2950
(Telephone)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid l
Pesticides
Noise
Other Population
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Sewage plant grants
(2) City treatment data
(3) Newport Bay Pollution Study
(4) Pollution index predictions
(5)
(8)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~
Southern California
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Qualitative
X
Abstract/Textaal
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence raquist for search only
On-Lina lyitwu
Otitert
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High spood print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
CRT
CRT
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Softmm
REMARKS: Developing a community water resource pollution profile file.
(Files being developed! availability schedule.)
C-113
-------
DATA BANK NAME: U. of Wisconsin - Thermal Pollution File
DB-101
SPONSOR: U. of Wisconsin
Marine Studies Center
1225 W. Dayton Street
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Director
(608)263-3250
(T elephona)
PERSON CONTACTED: Dr. T. Green III
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Watar Data x Pesticides
Air Data Noise
Radiation Other
Solid Wattes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Thermal pollution M
(2) Water Resources ®
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional ~ state ~ other
Regional - Lake Michigan
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative x Thermal pollution Narrative
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only x
On-Llne systems Accessibility
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed printout
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description Software programs
Operators handbook Demonstration retrievals
System configuration Others
Retrieval routines
REMARKS: On going water pollution research with cooperation of State
Resources and private industry.
(Flies being dovolopodi availability schedule.)
C-114
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Vanderbilt University
DB-102
SPONSOR: Vanderbilt University
Consulting Environmental and Water Resources Engineer
4400 Iroquois Avenue
Nashville, Tennessee 60439
Professor
PERSON CONTACTED:
Dr. Frank L. Parker
(Name)
(615)322-7311
(Telephone)
OATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data x
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wattes
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Thermal pollution
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
regional 13 state ~ other
Including the Great Lakes Region
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Othors
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only
On-Lino systems
Others
X
Accessibility
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic taps
X Y plotting _
EXISTING OATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS:
(Files being developed; availability schedule.)
C-115
-------
DB-103
DATA BANK NAME: Virginia - Marine Environmental and Resources Research
Management System (MERRMS)
SPONSOR: Marines Environment and Resources Management System
Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences
Gloucester Point, VA 23072
Staff to Director
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr. John Pleasants
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wattes
(703-642-1211, 642-2311
(T elephone)
Pesticides
Noise
Other
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Water Resources (4)
(2) Resource Planning (5)
(3) (6)
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~ regional 0 state
Member of Chesapeake Bay
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA: land
~ other
Consortium with John Hopkins, U. of Mary-
and Smithsonian.
Quantatlve X
Narrative X
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Llne systems Accessibility
Others Data exchange with common regional resource interests.
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
REMARKS)
(Files being developed) availability schedule.)
C-116
-------
DATA BANK NAME: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
DB-104
SPONSOR: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole MA 02543
Staff Organic Geochemistry
PERSON CONTACTED: Mr Jerry Sass
(Name)
DATA BASE ENVIRONMENT:
Water Data X
Air Data
Radiation
Solid Wastes
DATA BASE CONTENT:
(File titles)
(1) Marine Resource Planni
(2) Coastal Development
(3) Marine Research
SCOPE OF DATA: National ~£ regional ~
DATA CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPE OF DATA:
Quantative X
DATA BASE DISSEMINATION CAPABILITY:
Remote Inquiry Terminal Retrieval
Correspondence request for search only X
On-Line systems
Others
USE FORMAT CAPABILITY:
Terminal print-out
High speed print-out
Magnetic tape
X Y plotting _
EXISTING DATA BASE DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE:
Data base description
Operators handbook
System configuration
Retrieval routines
(617)548-1400
(Telephone)
West Falmouth Oil Spill
Oil Spill Impact
Narrative x
Abstract/Textual
Descriptors
Thesaurus
Others
Accessibility
Machine readable
CRT alpha numeric display
CRT graphic displays
Others
Software programs
Demonstration retrievals
Others
r
Pesticides
Noise
Other
(4)
(5)
(6)
state n other
REMARKS: Ap a major Sea Grant university there are a wide spectrum of on-
going research programs
(Files being developed-, availability schedult.)
C-117/118
-------
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
The natural environmental factors inventoried for this appendix are
grouped as follows:
Climatology
Total annual precipitation in inches:
Average daily minimum temperature (°F) in January
Average daily maximum temperature (°F) in July
Average daily solar radiation in Langleys (gram-calories/sq. cm.)
Average wind speed (knots) and prevailing direction in winter-spring
and summer-fall.
Oceanography
Minimum and maximum average monthly water temperature (°F)
Mean tidal range in feet
Biology
Dominant coastal vegetation
Geology
Classification of coastal terrain (plains, hills, mountains)
Description of shoreline shape and geomorphic character
Description of coastal rock or sediment types
Description of nearshore bottom sediment types
D-l
-------
Table D-2 is an inventory of the above factors prepared on a state and
county basis to provide descriptions of areas smaller than regions, but
also consistent with the other inventories conducted on a county basis.
Counties and states are listed alphabetically, but because Alaska has no
formal county structure, the coastline of the state was divided into
three regions, each with nine subregions. In this manner, the 27 Alaska
subregions are comparable to counties of the other coastal states. These
subregions are listed in clockwise order around the state, beginning at
the boundary with British Columbia.
The data for wind speed and direction for some counties had to be extra-
polated or interpolated based upon the nearest major weather stations.
Water temperature data is not presented for Northern Alaska or the Great
Lakes as both areas are frozen in winter. The available information on
current speed and direction was inadequate to describe the composite
circulation of geostrophic, tidal, longshore, and local currents. Thus,
this information is presented in generalized form on the regional map of
figure D-l. Two other environmental parameters are considered to be of
importance—wave characteristics and biotic assemblages; however, published
data is lacking that would allow this material to be entered into our
form. A glossary, table D-l, is provided to explain the abbreviations
that were used in table D-2, thereby allowing the maximum amount of
description to be included in a one-line per county print-out.
D-2
-------
REFERENCES
United States Coast Pilots, Vol. 1-9, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA-NOS
Tide Tables, East and West Coasts of North and South America, Ibid,
Climatology of the United States, Nos. 1-60, U.S. Dept. of Commerce,
NOAA-NOS.
ClimatoloRical Atlas of the United States, Ibid.
National Atlas, U.S. Dept. of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.
National Shoreline Study, Regional Inventory Reports (all), Dept. of
Defense, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
D-3
-------
0
1
4>
-
Figure D-l. Coastal ocean Currents
-------
TABLE D-l
GLOSSARY
ALD Alder
ALV Alluvium, Alluvial
ARC Arcuate
ASP Aspen
BCH Beach (mostly sand) or beachwood
BCHS Beaches
BIR Birch
BLDR Boulder, Bouldery
BLDRS Boulders
BLF Bluff
BLFS Bluffs
BLKHDS Bulkheads, Revetments
BNK Bank
BNKS Banks
BRR Barrier Island (mostly sand)
BRRS Barrier Islands
BRS Brush (Sage, chaparrel, cactus, etc.)
CBL Cobble, Cobbley
CBLS Cobbles
D-5
-------
CDR Cedar
CGS Cordgrass
CLF Cliff
CLFS Cliffs
CLY Clay, Clayey
CON Conifers, Undifferentiated
CSF Cusp, Cuspate
DLV Developed
DLT Delta, Deltaic
DLTS Deltas
DN Dune
DNS Dunes
DP Deep, Deeply
FJRDS Fjords
FRNG Fringe, Fringing
GR Gravel, Gravely
GRS Grass, (includes tundra)
HDLND Headland
HDLNDS Headlands
HI High
HIK Hickory
HLL Hill, Hilly
HML Hemlock
HRBR Harbor
HRBRS Harbors
D-6
-------
IGN
IND
IRR
ISLD
ISLDS
LAR
LDG
LDGS
LGN
LGNS
LO
LS
MAN
MD
MDFLTS
MDY
META
METASED
MPL
MRSH
MRSHS
MRSHY
MTN
PBL
PIN
Igneous Rocks (Intrusives)
Indented
Irregular
Island
Islands
Larch
Ledge
Ledges
Lagoon
Lagoons
Low
Limestone, Dolomite, Marble
Mangroves
Mud
Mudflats
Mudy
Metamorphic Rocks
Hard Sedimentary Rocks
Maple
Marsh
Marshes
Marshy
Mountain, Mountainous
Pebble
Pine, Pinyon
D-7
-------
PKTBCH Picket Beach (mostly gravel-pebbles)
PLM Palms, Palmettos
PLN Plain, Plateau
PTLY Partly
PTS Points
RF Reef
RFS Reefs
RFY Reefy
RK Rock
RKS Rocks
RKY Rocky
RVR River
RVTS Revetments
SCR Scrub (oak, juniper, etc.)
SD Sand
SDY Sandy
SED Sedimentary Rocks
SEQ Sequoias
SHR Shrubs
SLT Silt
SLTLY Slightly
SLTY Silty
SPA Spartina
SPR Spruce
SPT Spit
D-8
-------
STRT Straight
TILL Till (Glacial deposits)
TRC Trace
TUL Tules (willows, cattails, etc.)
VOLC Volcanic Rocks
WDD Wooded
D-9
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
o
¦
h-'
o
ZD uU'-fc. 197? COASTAL EVVIR'?\"ENTal I SVtNTB^Y
PAGE 1
flClA\erRAFHY -I&L.'GV »GE8L8G
PRE-
AV
Tf-P
iOL
* If-
-
i-'ATr
¦V
f'E-AN
r«Ml vaM
»*»..».
ROE
VEGETAT
^PLANiC
....».«..«SH0RELI^»•••••••«
UPLAND
SEDIMENTS
At
BALDWIN
+ 3
fe?
4C0
1CN
7S
5h
85
1
"AK-jKS
FLN
INC+STRT SD 3CH*3RR+TRC MRSh
SED
md+sd
Al
M8PILE
a
43
F9
-co
1CN
7S
5fr
S5
1
PJN-iAK
PLN
INC KRSH+STRT Si) 0RR
SED
iD+SD
A<
KETCHIKAN
liC
30
6"
tbC
I3t
J-S
4 1
57
13
cpr.^^l
rTN
FJRC5+RKY ISLDS TRC PKT bchs
1GN-KET A
SD-GR+RK
A<
JUNEAU
ICC
?e
6C
cbC
SSE
S fy
4L
b7
11
cpR.„M(_
NTN
cJROS+RKY ISLDS TRC PKT BCHS
IGN-^ETA
sd-gr+rk
A«
YAKUTAT
1?5
SC
fcC
t50
£F
7sr
3b
EC
X
TBN-eKS
^LL
STRT SD 13CHS
TILL
^D
AK
VALDEZ
ICC
16
6?
£53
7\E
7£F
n
is
SPP-l-yL
"TN
INC RK LCGS*RKY ISLDS
SED
md-rk
AK
SEWARD
7'j
1*
f £
£50
6NE
fcS
54
9
r-RS-CSK
fTN
INC RK ^CLDS+R
C
c
1C
r-KS
FLN-^TN
STRT SD 8CHS+SPTS
IGN+ALV
SD
A*
HAZEN BAY
17
56
c£5
14NE
las1-.
'w
3
nss
PLN
IRR SD 5CHS
AL.V
MD
AK
YUKeN DELTA
17
bR
c£5
13E
US'*
c
?
FLN
STRT SD BCHS+DLT
alv
MD
AK
ST. MICHAEL BAY
16
-4
6C
ccb
13F
IIS;-
ij
1
TRS-CBN
HLL
PKT BCHS*RKY ISLDS
V9LC+ALV
MD + SD
AK
N0RT0N BAY
l'J
6£
^c5
1?E
ICS 1.
c
1
r^S-C6N
IRR SD 9CHS
SED+I3N
SD
/<
N0ME
16
-6
¦56
IcE
ICS/.
c
1
ALD-GRS
FLN-hLL
IRR SD BCHS
TlLL+IGN
SD+GR-MD
AK
TELLER
1?
-£
57
£.25
1?E
13S-V
e
1
C-RS
FLN-V TN
STRT SD BCHS+SPTS
TILL+IGN
SD+RK
AK
SH1SHMAREF
1C
-1C
?5
cCO
13E
1 u
u
1
ns;s
PLN
INC SD 5CHS+STRT BRRS
SED
SD
AK
KeTZEBUE
R
-12
bF
aco
l^F
13t.
•j
1
PRS
fTN-PLK
INC SD PC^S
SED+iGN
mD + SD
AK
KIVALINA
R
-If
5C
cCC
13L
131.
1
l-RS
FLN-^TN
PKT BCHS+RKY LDGS
SED
sd+trc gr
Ax.
P0INT LAY
6
-rn
«
£CQ
l?f.E
13E
1
f-R S
PLN-mLL
STRT SD BCHc+BRRS
SED
SD
AK
BARR0V
4
-?3
46
£ CC
11NE
1 3t
u
A
1
ncs
FLK
STRT SD BRRS+LGNS
SED
md+sd
AK
DEASE INLET
5
45
tCO
1 1ME
13E
0
1
PRS
PLN
INC SD BCHS+ISLCS
SED
mD+SDy mD
AK
HARRISON BAY
5
-cl
44
cCC
ll'-E
13E
L
1
PRS
FLN
INC SD BCHS+DLTS
SED
MD+SDY MD
AK
PRUDH0E BAY
f-
-?1
45
cCO
14*
1?E
1
GRS
PLN
INC SD BCHSf^ANY ISLDS
SED
vD-GR
AK
KAKT0VIK
7
-c'O
46
etc
14;>
1EE
c
1
PRS
FLN
STRT SD BCHS+ISLDS
sed
md -GR
CA
ALA^rtA
?C
*C
£•«
4CC
6SE
1CW
51
6?
5
PRS
FLN-HLL
IRR MRSHY MDFLTS+CEV HRBRS
sed+alv
ID
CA
CONTRA C1S1A
c'J
3"
77
*•25
6GE
1CW
51
6^
4
PRS-jRS
i-LL
INC PKT BCHS+MRSHS
sed
MD-SD
CA
DEL Nt-KTE
7 b
if
68
3b0
7SE
5N
5?
b
PEC
f TN
STRT SD BCHS+RKY HDLDS
sed+meta
RK+SO
CA
HlilfaBLiiT
5b
4l
63
obO
7SE
oN
4y
bk
4
TBN-iEG
PLN-"TN
strt+ind SD bchs.
51
6°
4
TUL
PLN
INC MRSH
ALV
MD
CA
ORANGE
lb
**
76
*»50
6 A
7b,.
7
4
PRS
t-LL
INC PKT+STRT SD 3CHS
sed
SD+MD
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
£0 JUNE 197? Cf) AST*L ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
PAGE 2
•••»»»CLIfATbL8GV»«*»»* RCtANOGRAPHY RIBL&GY •GEBLeGY»«»«»»#•»•••«*»«•••»••#•«•»»
PRE-
AV
TEMP
a6L
WIND
WATEO
MEAN
ren\AKT
ST
COUNTY
CIP
WIN
SllM
NAD
KN6TS
TE"P
F
TIDE
TCASTAL
BOTTOM
IM/YR
M.IN
MAX
L/D
WIN
SUM
MI^
MAX
RCE
VECETAT
LiPLAND
»»»»««»#»»S(J9REL1NE**»«*#,*»
UPLAND
sediments
CA
san franc ISCO
25
44
64
375
7N
11M
51
60
4
GRS
HLL-
'MTN
PKT BCHS+IND *RSH,PTLY RKY
sed+meta
RK< SD+MD
CA
SAN LLIS OblSPQ
2C
43
75
*50
7NW
54
60
4
PRS
PLN-
'MTN
PKT+STRT SD BCHS»PTLY RKY
sed+alv
SD
CA
SAN mates
£5
*3
64
375
7N1«
14fc
51
60
*
HRS-GRS
PLN-
'MTN
PKT+STRT SD BCHS+IND MR5H
SED+IGN
SD#RK+MO
CA
Santa Barbara
15
43
72
4 75
7nw
Ah
5b
64
4
HAK-BRS
HLL-
MTN
RK MDLDS+STRT-PKT BCHS
SED
SD
CA
SANTA CLARA
15
39
8C
4C0
7NW
1*U
51
6^
7
TUL
PLN
IRR MRSH+MDFLTS
alv
MD
CA
SANTA CRUZ
25
3?
68
4C0
7n
111*
52
6C
4
«AK-SEG
MTN-
HLL
PKT BCHS+RK HOLDS
SED+IGN
SD
CA
SOLANS
20
37
79
425
8SE
10S*
51
69
4
TUL
HLL
I NO MRSH
sed+meta
MD+SDY MD
CA
SONOMA
3C
42
64
375
7N
llw
50
59
4
SEG+TUL
MTN+PLN
INC RK+JND MRSH
sed+meta
SD+MD
CA
VENTURA
15
42
76
*75
7w
feSw
56
68
4
PAK-BRS
PLN-
MTN
IND+STRT SD BCHS+RK HDLDS
sed+alv
MD-SD
CT
fairfielp
47
23
f>3
3C0
10NW
6SW
34
70
7
«a*
HLL
PKT BCHS+RK HDLDS
heta
SD
CT
MIDDLESEX
47
21
80
325
8NW
6Sw
3E>
7C
5
F>AK
HLL-
PLN
STRT-IND SD BCHS+PTLY MRSHY
meta+till
SD
CT
NFW HAVEN
<>7
22
81
3£5
8NW
6Sw
34
69
6
*AK
HLL-
PLN
STRT-IND SD BCHS+PTLY RKY
meta+till
SD
CT
NEW LONDON
48
22
81
325
8NW
6SV>
3/
7?
3
f»AK
HLL
PKT BCHS+RK LDGS
meta+till
SD
PC
KENT
*5
29
87
350
1CNW
8SW
3b
75
5
«AK-PJN
PLN
SLTLY IND MRSH+STRT SD BCH
SED
MD
DE
NE* CASTLE
45
27
«a
350
1CNW
7S
36
77
6
f»AK
PLN
INC-STRT MRSH
SED
MO
DE
SUSSEX
45
30
86
375
1CNH
8Sw
37
74
4
«AK-P]lv
PLN
STRT SD BCH^BRR+MRSMY LGN
sed
MD+SD
DC
WASHIKGT9K DC
4C
29
87
350
UNU
8S
37
83
3
sak-pik
PLN
STRT MDD CLY-GR+RK RVR BNK
sed
MD-RK
FL
BAY
58
47
89
450
8N
6S^
56
85
1
"AK-GRS
PLN
IND MRSH+SD BCH+STRT SD SPTS
SED
SD
FL
BREVARD
53
55
89
450
9NW
7L
63
82
3
"AK-GRS
PLN
STRT LGN+CSP SD BRR
SED
SD-MD
FL
BROWARD
56
62
88
4b0
ION
7SE
70
86
2
PIN-9AK
PLN
STRT SD BCH
LS
SD
FL
CHARLOTTE
54
55
91
450
8NE
6E
6b
87
1
GRS-MAN
PLN
IND MRSH+MANY SMALL SD BRRS
sed
SD
FL
CITRUS
55
50
90
450
8N
7E
59
86
2
RAK
PLN
IND MRSH+MANY ISLDS
LS
SD
fl
CLAY
53
47
92
<~25
9NW
7S'*
5*
87
1
P1N-6AK
PLN
IND MRSHY RVR BNKS
SED
MD
fl
COLLIER
54
57
90
450
8NE
6E
67
87
2
MAN-GRS
PLN
IND SWAMP+MANY C0RAL KEYS
LS+SED
SO
FL
DADE
48
64
88
450
UN
HSE
71
67
2
pjn-mak
FLN
STRT SWAMP+SD BRRS
LS
SD
FL
DIXIE
51
48
89
425
8N
65E
58
85
2
flAK-GRS
PLN
SLTLY IND MRSH
SEO+LS
SD
TL
DUVAL
52
50
89
425
*JNW
75 k
57
82
5
PIN-OAK
PLN
INC MRSH+STRT SD BRRS
SED
SD-GR
FL
ESCAMBIA
61
47
88
425
8N
5S
56
8C
1
PIN-9AK
PLN
IND MRSH+STRT SD BRR+LGN
SED
SD
FL
FtAGLCR
51
51
89
425
9NIW
7E
60
81
*
"AK-GRS
PLN
STRT MRSH+SD BRR
sed
SD
FL
franklin
55
*8
8B
*50
PN
57
Bc.
1
"AK-GRS
PLN
STRT SD 3CH+BRRS*PTLY MRSHY
SED
SD
FL
GULF
57
48
88
450
8N
6>S^
5b
85
1
PAK-GRS
PLN
STRT SD 3CH+SPTS+S8ME MRSH
SED
SD
FL
HERNANDO
55
51
9C
*50
8N
7SE
£0
86
2
«AK
PLN
STRT-SLTLY IND MRSH-SHAMP
LS
SD
FL
HILLSB6R9UGW
54
52
9C
450
8N
7E
62
86
1
OIN-3AK
PLN
IND MRSH
LS
MD»SD
fl
INDIAN RJVfR
54
56
89
*50
9NW
6E
6b
8?
T
PIN-3AK
PLN
STRT LGN+SD BRR
SED
SO-MD
fl
JEFFERSON
53
¦*6
90
*25
8N
57
85
?
PIN-c)A<
PLN
STRT MRSH
SED
SD
fl
LEE
54
56
91
450
8NE
6E
6b
87
1
MAN
PLN
INC SWAMP+MANY IRR SD BRRS
SED
SD
FL
LEVY
52
49
90
450
8N
7 SI
5a
86
3
f»A<-GRS
PLN
IND MRSH+FEl. ISLOS
SED
SD
FL
MANATEE
54
54
9C
450
8N
7E
A3
86
1
PJN-3AK
PLN
IND MRSH+STRT SD BRRS
LS
SD
FL
MARTIN
57
6C
89
*50
9N'«
6C
#i>5
84
3
PJN-bCR
PLN
INC MRSH+STRT SD BCH
sed
SD-MD
fl
MpNROE
5C
59
89
*75
1 IN
'8S£
70
87
3
MAN
PLN
IND SWAMP+MANY C8RAL KEYS
LS
HD-SD
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
e
i
i-1
22 JUNE 197'rf
C^AST»L E.WIKu\"ENTAL INVtNTO^Y
page
• cuif atslRCiy <
">r.v >.N3C^&PhY PltlL'JGY
»GF.9L8GY<
ST C»^mTY
ru NASSAU
fl eK/.tnesA
FL PAL"1 tt-ACH
n pasco
Fl PINELLAS
Ft PuTNAK
Fl st. jqhks
fl ST. LUCIE
Tl SANTA ReSA
Fl bAHASSTA
fl tayl&k
fl VPLoSIa
FL -AKULLA
Fl XALT3N
Ga BRYAN
GA CArDEN
GA CHATHAM
GA GLYNN
GA LlbEPTY
GA ^Cl^TeSh
HI HA*AI I
MI H6N9LULU
HI KAuAl
Hi MALI
il c?e<
tL LA A 3 T A L
Tj/YR
-]V v
¦AX L/J
a I N
oL'-'
•1!\ »¦
AX KbE
viGET AT
5)?
it?
89
rNS
7 b A
5(-
83
6
OIN-3AK
(1
47
»!< "25
bS
8C-
C
PIN-oRS
r>'
«9 4^0
fcE
64
»'¦
i
PlN-iCR
b*
5?
9C 4bO
<5\
7L
ftl
R6
?
PIN-JAK
53
'3*
89 ¦«bO
)»N
7 L
6 c
?6
?
PJN-JAK
b3
J. f«
0? 425
9NW
7sr.
8 7
1
PIN-OAK
b2
c. 0
PT 4cb
73
5 ¦)
8"
4
P I N-t)AK
bt-
r>8
B9 450
9NiW
6E
66
84
T
<=lN-aCR
ft
<47
423
FN
5S
56
85
1
fAK-3RS
b4
54
oc 46a
»N£
7E
#•"
86
I
PIN-3AK
be
-7
R9 425
5/
o
P I N - 3 A <
51
'-2
><9 450
9nw
7E
6 i
81
4
"AK-GRS
54
9C "»bO
8N
6S>.
5/
85
?
PIN-OAK
6C
-7
*»c5
UN
bS
56
8C
1
PA-<-3RS
5£
•~1
91 ic S
P'.F
6S>
S4
k
«A<-uRS
55
-.5
31 42b
9N»
/S>
5r>
8-
55
81"-
7
"AK-GRS
!>3
i3
91 425
8\C
65 a
53
8r'
;
PAK-GRS
53
«3
91 4?b
SN
7S-
54
8r-
7
RAK-GRS
75
63
«2 SCO
1CNE
1 3NF
75
1
PrlR-PL^
3C
66
85 bCO
1C\E
13NK
73
8C
1
chR-PL^
bC
64
if4 bCO
1CNE
13Nf
71
8C
i
c^R-Plc
bC
63
87 'jCO
1 3S
lR'JE
7^-
77
1
r^S-SHC;
33
1°
83 cl5
12-
5S-
C
r
HRS-HAK
33
17
83 3C0
1 2..
hS»>
o
T-RS-9A<
36
19
83 e75
Iclv
ss«
0
f»A"<-HlK
37
1?
83 325
1 c«
*sS«
0
?
0
RAK--IK
36
19
?3 3C0
I2w
8 3-a
0
«AK-mIK
S3
h5
{•3 425
1 IN
75
54
86
1
<:pa
6?
47
9C '.CO
1C\
is3
5b
86
1
cpa
C3
4*
91 iSO
S\
63
6i
8b
1
SPA
f.?
4*
91 375
°\
ho
5y
8C
1
CPA
64
49
e9 jbO
fta
60
8^
1
SPA
55
4°
g9 4C0
9N
b3
6C
1
CPA
6 C
-.0
39 j7rj
S\
63
60
8C
1
cp A
6C
S
9C 3b0
9N
f>S
61
85
1
CPA
>T 59
4*
90 350
9\
f>3
61
R5
1
CPA
05
4*
90 J 7b
ION
f> S
*•»
8'
1
CPA-aAK
63
45
4*7 j50
9N
63
60
85
1
"AK-SPA
•••GE0M^RPHc'LBGY
»PETR9L93Y••
RfiTTdM
i,pLANU ••••*• ••••SW6RELIKE»« ••••••«
PLN IND PRSH*ST«T SD BRR
FLN INO-STRT LGN+STRT SO BRR
PLN STRT LGN+SD BRR
PLN STRT-SLTLY i\D MRSH
PLN STRT-IND MRSH+SD eRRS
PLN IMC fRSHY RvR BNKS
PLN INC-STRT MRSH + STRT SO BRR
PLN STRT LGn+SD BRR
PLN STRT LGN+SD 0RR+INO MRSH
PLN STRT LGN+SD SPTS+8RRS
PLN STRT-SLTLY IND MRSh
FLN STRT-IND MRSH+STRT SD BRR
PLN INC MRS"
PLN INC LGN+STRT SD SPT
FLN CP I NO ^RS
PLN CP INO mrSh+STRT-INO SD BRRS
PLN CP IND MRSH*STRT-IND SD BRRS
PLN DP IND mRSH+STRT-IND SD BRRS
PLN CP IND «RSH»STRT-IND SD BRRS
PLN CP IND "RSh*STRT-IND SD BRRS
PTN-HLL K< CLFS+FEW PKT BCHS*RFS
KTN-PlN PKT-ARC BCHS+RKY hDLDS
PTN-PlN FKT-STRT BCHS*R
-------
TABLE D-2. OOASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
EC Jli'-E 1972
:f'-AST«L EW [WK^EMAL INVENTORY
page i
¦ CLr'A^L^GY...
:irr^\°"r:Af'My ;fiL?riv
»GE9l0C
CJ
I
I-*
u>
PRl -
JV
r p-p
j?L
=-I\
:va rt;e
M£A\
rnrJ\4\T
* * *
* * #
,«»«jERMiRPH^LeGY*•«.«•«««~
CIP
-1 r.
Su'1
AO
knji
T'j
Tf-'P
F
TPt
rr>ASTAt
B9TT8M
ST
County
tt.-/Vk
Mi.
»'*X
u/n
•IN
3>jM
MT\ !
'AX
PCF
^tlFTAT
LPLA\D
UPLAND
SEDJME1
L*
TANCIPAl^PA
5'3
•~a
9C
jb3
9-J
uo
6 i
«
1
"A*
PLN
STRT SD BCH
ALV
ID
L*
TrK*Eije\NE
6C
S3
375
CS;
6 5
cb
t'f
1
CPA
FLh
STfiT-IND SD BCH+BRRS+fRSH
alv
mD+SD
LA
VERMJL1PM
C **
4»
gc
• CO
ICN
7S
«i»
86
t
PPA
PLN
STRT+IND SD BCH+MCFLTS
alv+sed
"D
ME
CU^bEHLAND
tt
13
79
JbO
9\
7S
3?
h~
fPL—.-IS
PLN-
mLL
INC HKY FKT 0CHS+ISLDS
hetased
SD-GR
ml
HANCflC*
<~0
13
79
j50
1 IN
6S
3J
67
n
cps.rit;
HLL
CP INO SK LC3S*ISLOS
IGN+MET ASED
MD-SD
rz
KKex
<<5
13
79
j50
ICN
/o
3c
fi1:
9
MPL-3PS
HLL
CP IND LCSS+ISLDS
METASED
SD-GR
ME
LINCOLN
13
78
350
3\
y*3
3c
b13
1
MPL-L:I^
hLL
CP IND s?« LfGS+ISLDS
MET ASED+1CN
SD-GR
ME
SAGADAh«C
<.4
13
7S
JbC
9V
32
6r
q
"PL-aIH
hLL
CP IND MX LCQS+ISLOS
METASEC
SD-GR
ME
hALDP
»8
.12
?0
350
1 CN
¦'c
3?
1 ^
fPL-aP«
hll
IND-STRT RK LDGS+ISLDS
METASED
^O-SD
r*E
WASHINGTON
^3
1?
7*
j50
12N
6!i
33
b<.
13
PPR-PIR
HLL
INC-STRT RK LDGS+ISLDS
metased+ign
SD-GR
MF
YPRK
^3
It
SC
325
t?N
HS
?3
6r
•)
MPL-^A<
PLN
STRT SD BCH+SLTLYINQ MRSH
HETASED+IGN
SD-GR
fD
AMNC AKUMDCL
*3
n
R6
ibi)
11NU
}.,
37
8f
1
PAK-PIN
PLN
CP IND wDD RNKS+SBme 3D BCHS
SED
MD
fo
ualtimbrf
A3
30
?6
j50
llNls
3/
tiC
1
"AK-PIN
PLN
CP IND *CD CLY-uR DNKS
SED
M3
CALVERT
•*3
•0
86
JbO
11NW
'-S
3S
8C
1
f>AK-PIN
PLN
STRT*IND WDD BNKS+SO HCHS
sed
MO
CECIL
Hi*
2*
R7
jbO
1CNV.
vr,
37
8'"
?
"AK.-PIS
PLN
CP ISO wDD CLY-GR BNK3
SED
-ID
MO
CHAHLES
*C
3f!
87
i50
11NW
S3
3S
82
1
"AK-PIN
PLN
INC WOD CLY.3R HVR BNKS
SED
M£
DPRCHEr.TtW
31
?6
J '5
1 INS
9w
3 3
81
"AK-FJN
PLN
CP !ND MRSH
SED
*o
MS
HkXFORV
* 3
py
F6
350
IO^v»
7o
3/
sr
1
»AK-PIN
PLN
CP IND *DD CLY-GR BNKS
SED
MO
MO
KENT
*3
3S
S6
j50
1CN'»
/s
37
pak-pjn
PLN
INC wDD CLY.QR BNKS
SED
VID
MO
PR net SEB^-fiES
th.
?S
87
jbO
1 1NW
«5
3/
83
P
"AK-PIN
PLN
IND WDD CLY-GR RVR BNKS
SED
hD
MO
QUEEN AN'CS
30
«6
j53
1 1NW
9*
3/
8^
1
"»A<-P1N
PLN
CP IND 4CC CLY-GR BNKS
SED
MD
ML)
oT• marys
4b
30
36
j75
mw
*s
39
R^.
L
"AK-PJN
PLN
IND WDD CLY-3R BNKS
SED
VD
MD
Sflt'ERSET
*6
3?
86
j /5
11'JW
37
53
p
"AK-PIN
PLN
CP IND *RSH
SED
MS
T ALtiOT
,*»
31
?6
J?0
llNW
39
81
1
"AK-P1K
FLN
CP IND *CD CLY-GR BNKS
SED
MO
Mf>
.JICOMICe
4b
"in
*6
375
1 l^W
y«i
33
fif
P
»AK-FIK
PLfJ
CP [NO "RSH
SED
'10
md
•ISKCESTEV
4*
31
86
375
1 1NW
Q.ii
3*
7 U
*i
fA<-rIK
PLN
IND MRSHY LHN+STRT SD DRRS
SED
SD+HD
MO
Baltimore riiv
h3
31
?6
J 50
llvw
9w
37
1
tAK-PJN
PLN
IND DEV HRBR
SED
MD
MA
»AkNS"A3LE
42
26
79
oSO
lbww
IIS-
33
fcb
4
«Al<-PIN
PLN
STRT SD BCHS+SPTS+IND MRSH
till
SD-GR
MA
IlKISTOL
*3
25
3C
J50
15NW
USm
3*
7r
4
P AK
FLN
STRT-IRR SD 0CHS*IND MRSH
till+meta
SD
MA
DIKES
<.4
26
80
JbO
15NU
1IG,:
33
7r
?
»A<-PIS
PLN
STRT SD BCHS
till
SD
MA
tsstx
4r
22
78
325
1SNW
1 J b A
3*
63
3
»*AK
l-'LL-
PLN
JND+STRT SD BCH+RKY+MRSHY
IGN
SD-GR
MA
:j»KTjCi
MPL--JIK
PLN
STRT GR BCH
TILL
SD-GR
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
I iV |K-'t>Mf\TAL INVFNTBRY
PAGE 5
• ..•••CLIVAT-USGV •«».»~ 'iC'.ANer^APHy ciOl-J'jV • •• ...... ~ •••••GE8L8G'
PRfc-
«V T
r;pp
o"L
WIN
J A T r
rt*-\
[•;>pi\ant
E.PMflRPH1L0GY»««»#»»»»»
• .»»».#«PfcTRnL8GY»«>
325
9nw
7*
0
"PL-ris
PLN
STRT SD BCH+WK LOGS
T ILL+1ETA
SD-RK
"1
HAY
27
1 9-
83
3C0
123h
<53-a
¦J
n
0
flp-ash
PLN
IHR MRSm+TRC STRT SO BCH
till
MD
PI
iiENZIE
31
IP
SC
325
lOSk
/S
r
vPL-elW
PLN
STRT SD-GK ?CH+L8 blfs
till
sd-md
PI
BERRIEN
.36
?1
82
jc5
1?N
¦iS.
u
"5
^AK-HI<
PLN
STRT SD 8CH+0NS-BLPS
till
SD
PI
CHARuEVOIX
3C
1!?
79
325
83 W
oS
fj
c
yPL-c!«
FLN
IRR GR-CBL SCH
TILL+LS
SD-GR
PI
CHE3BYGAN
13
77
325
*Sls
6S
c
f!
c
SPR-LAS
PLN
STRT-IRR SD BCH+PRSH
till
"D-SD
PI
CHIPP£'/.A
3C
10
75
325
ICE
9k
c
"PL-FIR
PLN
PKT-STRT BCW+RKY HDLDS
till+sed
SD-RK
PI
DFLTA
3C
11
77
325
ICiNX
JS-
c
?
PPL-FIM
PLN
INC RKY PKT-3TRT SD BCM+MRSM
till+ls
mD-RK
PI
EPPET
29
it
7K
o25
ftS'*
65
¦)
fPL-L-! K
PLN
IRR SD-6LDR HCH+BLFS-PRSH
till+ls
mO-GR
PI
G»'JEBIC
3h
7».
350
9Nw
7 to
c
c
"PL-FIR
hLL-PLN
RKY HDLD+PKT BCHS
MF.TA
rk-sd
PI
GRAND TRAVfRSr
31
If-
81
325
1CSW
73
c
"PL-yIr
PLN
INC SD-F3LDR 3CH+BLFS
TILL
SD-GR
MI
t^UGHT^N
3S
6
73
350
9NW
7w
c
n
"PL-FIR
PLN
STRT SD BCH+TRC RKY BLF
TILL+META
SD-RK
PI
HUR9N
26
1%
RC
3CC
1 2SW
33 a
c
r>
^AK-^I<
PLN
IRR SD BCH+PRSH+RK+CLY PLPS
sed
MD-BLDRS
PI
If»SCO
2S
15
ac
3C0
ICS'.*
73
'J
0
flM-aS>-
PLN
STRT-ARC SD UCH+MRSH
TILt
MD-SD
PI
«E>EENA'x
3?
6
70
325
9NW
7:i
c
o
"PL-l; IR
LLL
IRR RK BLFS+PKT BCNS
PETA+TILL
RK-SD
PI
LEELANAU
31
1'
79
325
lOSlx
7S
"PL-tj IR
PLN
IRR GR-CBL BCH+8LFS*DN
till
SD-GR
PI
LUCE
31
13
7*
325
ICE
9«
G
*
PJN
PLN
STRT SD BCH
Till
SD-GR
PI
MACKINAC
2?
ir
76
j 25
ICE
9w
•J
r
r;
"PL-F I R
FLN
IRR RKY PTS+PKT BCHS+MRSH
TILL+SED
MD-RK
PI
M.\C3ME
e*
19
fit
jCO
11NW
US
'J
r
L/
"ak-mIk
FLN
IND PRSH+DEV HRdR
TILL
MD
PI
MAN I STt-E
31
19
«C
jcb
ICS'*
73
c
r
3
FIN
FLN
STRT SD-GR BCH*L9 BLFS
till
SD-MD
PI
MAR'JUETTE
31
1C
7»
325
9NW
IV.
w
r
c
ppl-fir
PLN
ARC SD RCHS+RKY 8LPS
TILL+META
SD-RK
PI
MAS3N
3C
->c
S3
325
12N
V
*
P I N
PLN
STRT SD BCH*DNS
TILL
SD
PI
MEXOPINEE
28
10
79
325
1CN»
93 *
u
r>
n
"^L-FIR
PLN
STRT SD BCH
till
SD
PI
mcnR9L'
3C
2C
85
325
l2Nta
SS*
V
C
r*
FLM-ASH
PLN
INC PRSh+TRC RKY PTS+PKT BCH
till+ls
MD-RK
PI
MUSKEGbN
31
ZC
SI
J25
1?N
ss»
j
r-
pi N
FLN
STRT SD BCH»3LF
till
SD
PI
9CEANA
31
2C
8C
325
1?N
8S«
c
r\
¦J
FJN
FLN
STRT SD BCH+DNS-L9 BLFS
till
SD-MD
PI
UNT9NAG6N
35
10
76
350
9nx
7,v
'J
c
9
"PL-F
PLN
RK LDGS+ARC SD BCH
till+meta
SD-RK
PI
tfTT0*A
3 c1
21
R1
325
!?N
rt3'«
u
r
PIN
PLN
STRT SD BCH+DNS-BLFS
till
SD-MD
PI
PRLSiUE ISUE
CD
1*
77
Jcb
83*
63
c
J
PPR-LAR
PLN
STRT-IRR SD BCH+RK LDGS
IS+TILL
SD-RK
PI
ST. CLAIR
?7
19
83
3C0
1 IV*
»3
f •
c
FL"!-aSH
PLN
STRT SD-CBL BCH+MRSHY DLT
till
mD-GR
PI
SAMLAC
27
IS
32
JCO
1 ? 3 W
S5w
•J
C,
pAK-hI<
PLN
STRT SD-C8L BCH+CLY BLFS
till
SD-GR
PI
3CH0OLCK AF* T
3?
1?
75
325
ION*
93 V
c
£
~i
"PL-fir
PLN
IRR SD-CBL BCH+RK+DNS
TILL+SED
SD-RK
PI
TUSCOLA
27
1^
St
3C0
12S*
c
o
o
Elp-aSH
PLN
IRR PRSh
till
MD
PI
VAN
3b
32
»2
325
12N
r>3*
c
•-;
r,
FlP-AG^-
FLN
STRT SD-GR PCH+BLFS-DNS
till
"D-GR
m r
WAYNE
?')
rC
8»
325
llN*
S3
0
0
9AK—I<
PLN
CEV HRBR
till
MD
M\
CS3K
c7
6
71
J50
1 3 N»
IOC
:J
~
?"R-FIR
>-LL
STRT RK BLFS+TRC PKT BCH
META
SD-RK
PN
LAKE
18
f>
7s
350
13N'„
IOC
0
/>
3
PIN
l-LL
STRT RK BLFS
MfT A
SD-RK
P-«
ST. LOU13
29
1
76
350
13'.w
IOC
0
Z
"PL--3SS
PLN
STRT SD-GR PCH+SPT*DEV HRBR
TILL
SD-QR
-s
HANCOCK
62
v6
9C
JbO
9N
*>3
c,9
as
1
PIN-JAK
FLN
IND MRSM+TRC ARTIFICIAL BCH
SED+ALV
"D
0
1
20 JUNE l'J7?
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
20 JUNE 1973
COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL inventory
page 6
••••••CLIMATOLOGY*
OCEANOGRAPHY BIOLOGY
•GEOLOGY"
0
1
i-*
m
PRE-
AV
TEfP
SOL
WIND
WATER
MEAN
dominant
PETROLOGY»»«»«<
CIP
WIN
SUM
RAD
KNOTS
Tem"
F
tide
COASTAL
BOTTOM
ST
COUNTY
IN/YR
MIN
MAX
L/D
KIN
SUM
MAX
RGE
VEGETAT
upland
••••••••••SHORELINE»«»#»***«
UPLAND
sediments
MS
HARRISON
60
47
89
375
9N
6S
58
85
1
PJN-aAK
PLN
STRT SD BCH+BRR+MRSHY LGN
SED»ALV
MD
MS
JACKSON
60
46
89
400
ION
6S
57
85
1
PIN-OAK
PLN
INO MRSHY DLT+BCH+STRT BRR
sed
MD
NH
ROCKINGHAM
*2
22
81
325
11NW
8SW
34
61
8
"AK
PLN
STfiT+PKT 8CHS+MRSH+RK LOGS
METASED
SD-MD
NJ
ATLANTIC
44
28
80
350
13W
9S
36
71
4
CRDGRSS
PLN
DP IND MRSHY LGNS*STRT BRR
sed
SD
NJ
BERGEN
45
25
85
300
10NW
7SW
35
74
4
"AK
HLL
STRT RK PALISAOE RVR BNK
METASEO
SD-RK
NJ
CAMDEN
44
27
88
325
llNW
8§w
36
79
6
"AK
PLN
DEV HRBR
sed
MD-RK
NJ
CAPE KAY
44
29
82
350
l3w
9S
36
73
4
CRDGRSS
PLN
STRT SD BCH+BRRS+IND MRSH
SED
SD
NJ
CUMBERLAND
45
28
86
350
11NW
8S
36
75
6
OAK-PIN
PLN
INC MRSH+IRR SD BCHS
SED
MD
NJ
ESSEX
44
24
86
300
12NW
9SW
36
73
5
OAK
PLN
CEV HRBR
SED
SD-RK
NJ
GLOUCESTER
44
27
88
325
11NW
8Sw
36
78
6
" AK
PLN
INO MRSH*CLY-GR RVR 8NK
SED
MD
NJ
HUDSON
44
26
85
300
11NW
8SW
36
73
5
"AK
PLN
DEV HRBR
SED
SD-RK
NJ
MIDDLESEX
45
24
88
325
12NW
9SW
35
73
5
BAK
PLN
STRT SD BCH+IND MRSH
SED
SD
KJ
MONMOUTH
44
26
83
325
12NW
9Sw
35
74
4
"AK
PLN
STRT SD BCH+SPT +TRC IND MRSH
sed
3D
NJ
OCEAN
44
26
79
350
13W
9S
3b
72
4
CRDGRSS
PLN
IND MRSHY LGN+STRT SD BRRS
sed
SD
NJ
SALEM
44
27
87
350
1CNW
7S
36
77
6
OAK
PLN
IND MRSH+TRC STRT SO BCH
SED
MO
NJ
UNION
46
24
87
325
12NU
3SV
35
73
5
OAK
PLN
IND MRSH+DEV HRBR
SED
SO-RK
NY
BRONX
44
26
84
SCO
icnw
7Sw
34
72
7
"AK
PLN
CEV HRBR+RK-GR PKT BCHS
METASED
SD-RK
NY
CAYUGA
34
18
79
300
11SW
7SW
0
0
0
RCH-WPL
PLN
IND MRSH*GR BRRS
TILL
MD-GR
NY
CHATAUQUA
39
23
80
3C0
14W
10SU
0
n
0
BCH-MPL
PLN
STRT GR BCH*SHALE BLFS
SED+TILL
GR-MD
NY
ERIE .
36
22
80
300
15SW
nsw
0
0
0
PCH-MPL
PLN
STRT GR BCH+SHALE BLFS+HRBR
SEO*TILL
SR-MD
NY
JEFFERSON
32
14
7B
275
12W
8SW
0
0
0
KPL-BIR
PLN
IRR RK LDGS+TRC STRT SD BCH
METASED
SO-RK
NY
KINGS
43
27
82
225
10NW
7SW
34
71
5
"AK
PLN
IND MRSH+STRT 9CH+DEV HRBR
till
SD
NY
MONROE
32
18
83
300
11SW
7SW
0
n
0
PCH-MPL
FLN
IRR MRSH*STRT SD-GR BRRS
till
MD
NY
NASSAU
45
25
81
325
9NW
7SW
34
71
4
PAK-GRS
PLN
IND MRSH+STRT+IRR BCH«BRR
TILL
SD
NY
NEW YORK
44
26
84
300
10NW
7SW
36
73
4
"AK
PLN
DEV HRBR
SED
SD
NY
MI AGARA
31
19
83
300
13SW
9SW
0
C
0
MPL-E1R
PLN
STRT RKY BCH*BLFS
till+sed
MD-RK
NY
ORLEANS
31
18
82
300
12SW
8SW
C
C
0
KPl-BIR
PLN
ARC-STRT SD-GR BCH+BLFS
TILL
md-gr
NY
OSWEGO
34
16
78
300
12W
8SW
0
c
0
KPL-B1R
PLN
IRR MRSH+GR-SD BRRS+BCHS
TILL+SED
md-gr
NY
QUEENS
*4
26
82
325
10NW
7SW
34
7?
7
"AK
PLN
IND MRSH*DEV HRBR+STRT BCH
TILL
SD
NY
RICHM0NO
44
2?
83
325
11 nk
8SW
3b
7?
5
"AK
PLN
INO MRSH+STRT SO BCH
SED+TILL
mD-SD
NY
ST LAWRENCE
32
10
82
275
12SW
8SW
0
C
0
PCH-MPL
PLN
1RR-STRT RK LDGS
METASED
RK
NY
SUFFOLK
44
24
80
350
8NW
6S«!
34
6*
4
bak-pin
PLN
IND MRSH4STRT-IND BCH+BRR
TILL
SD-MD
NY
WAYNE
33
18
82
300
nsw
7SW
0
C
0
BCH-WPL
PLN
STRT-IND GR BCH+MRSH+GR BRRS
TILL
MD-GR
NY
WESTCHESTER
46
24
85
300
10NW
83k
34
71
7
"AK
HLL
INO RK LDGS+PKT BCHS
METASED
SD-9K
NC
BEAUFORT
54
35
90
455
13N
10SK
46
8"?
0
"AK-PIN
PLN
DP IND MRSH+SD RVR BNKS
sed
MD
NC
BERTIE
49
33
90
hCO
12NW
10SW
43
82
0
PAK-PIN
PLN
IND MRSH+SD RVR BNKS
SED
MD
NC
BRUNSWICK
50
40
87
425
ION
9SW
52
82
5
P1N-8 AK
PLN
STRT SD BRRS+BCH+IND MRSH
SED
SD-GR
NC
CAMDEN
46
37
87
425
12NW
10GW
*2
81
0
"AK-PIN
PLN
IRR SD BCH+IND MRSH
SED
MD
NC
CARTERET
56
39
87
4g5
13N
lOSu
48
82
3
P1N-QHS
PLN
CSP-STRT SD BRRS»I NO MRSH
SED
SD-3R
NC
CHOWAN
50
34
9C
4 CO
12NW
10SW
43
8?
0
"AK-PIN
PLN
IRR SD 8CH+RVR BNK+IND MRSH
SEO
MD
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
t
20 JUNE 1972 [;?A",T4U t>V!^\"lEMAL INVENTORY
PAGE 7
«11
• ••CLI*at.)l3';y»»«i
»• »
ICt-i
N^HRSPHV
PIfJL-1'jY
PRE»
AV
Tf^p
o9L
-r
WATFP
"EA M
n?MI\AKT
C1P
I
. 3U^
r^AD
KKtjTS
TE^
F
T11E
r?AS T AL
bbttbm
ST
CPLNTY
IM/*K
;-l>.
. t'AX
t/0
* I N
'ioM
MAX
RGF
VFGETAT
bPLANC
UPLAND
sediments
NC
CRAVEN
57
37
88
•*c5
12n
ICS-.
k!
83
hak-pin
PLN
CP IND MRSH+30 RVR BNKS
SED
mD
NC
CURRITUCK
38
86
«c:i
12N
ICS*
<• 4
77
PIN-CCjS
PLN
STRT SO BRR+IND SO BCM*MRSH
SE5
hD-GR
NC
OANE
46
39
87
*25
1 3fj
ICS'.
44
8C
3
PIN-GRS
PLN
CSP SD BRRS+INO HRSH
SED
SD
NC
HYCE
37
89
tc5
13C4
ICS*
4b
HP
1
PIN-G^S
FLN
INC MRSM + STtJT SD BRR
SED
md
NC
WE'* HAiMQVE^
51
39
86
-»2 5
1CN
93 a
r-i
8?
P IN-'jAK
PLN
STRT-IRR SO BRR+BCH+MRSH
SED
SD-GR
NC
3NSLPW
E4
3?
86
425
ICn
9Sa
4*
8?
3
"AK-GRS
PLN
STRT SD BRRS+RVR BNKS+HRSH
SED
SD-GR
NC
PAMLICO
57
37
88
4c5
I3N
IC-Sv
4/
83
«ak-pjn
PLN
CP IND HRSH+SO RVR BNKS
SED
MD
NC
PASUUHTaNK
49
36
88
»C0
lcNX
103a
4t'
81
r-
PAK-H1N
PLN
IRR SD eCH+IND MRSH
SED
MD
NC
PENDER
5?
39
£6
425
ICN
9S»
5G
P?
3
"AK-PIN
PLN
IRR SD BRR+BCH+MRSH
SED
SD-GR
NC
PER3UIMANS
bC
35
89
*co
i?n*
luS'«
4 j
81
n
SAK-FIN
PLN
CP IND SC BCH
SED
MD
NC
TYRRELL
5C
36
83
425
12N
IOSa
43
81
0
PIN
PLN
DP IND MfiSH
SED
MD
NC
WASHINGTON
5C
3't
89
<3
FLM-ASH
PLN
IRR ^RSM+STRT BRR+SD-GR BCH
TILL
SD-MD
Rm
LAKE
35
?3
81
325
13Sfc
9Sh
c
r;
C
PCM-fPL
PLN
STRT SD-GR BCH+CLY-SLT BL^S
TILL
SD-MD
Oh
LORAIN
34
6?
6
SPR-CDR
PLN-^TN
STRT-IND SD BCH+RK hold
sed
RK
6R
TILLArS?<
8C
36
C7
3C0
SS
9NW
49
58
6
^PR-CDR
PLN-MTN
STRT-IND SD 0CH+RK HDLO
SED+V8LC
SD
PA
uCL AW Af»L
48
?7
88
325
I 1 Ni*
SSU
36
7®
6
PAK
PLN
INC MRSH+CLY-GR RVR BNK
META
MD
PA
ERIE
33
?C
8C
Jc5
I3w
9S
0
?
r.
P AK
PLN
STRT SD-GR BCH+SPT+HI BLFS
SED+TILL
mD-GR
PA
PHILACEL°HIA
*8
26
8S
325
1 INh
36
79
6
"AK
PLN
CEV HRBR
met*
vD
R!
EJRI3T0L
*3
2*
79
350
1*NW
IOS,.
35
7-1
4
PAK
i-LL-PLN
IND RK LCGS+PKT BCHS
heta+till
SD-MD
HI
KENT
4C
? 4
si
->£5
llNk»
93*
35
7C
4
PAK
HLL-FLN
IND PKT bchs+Rk lcgs
till+meta
SD-MD
RI
NT aPORT
43
?3
79
350
l?Nh
ICS'»
3b
69
4
PAK
PLL
INO RK LCGS+PKT BCHS
meta+till
SD+RK
RI
PROVIDENCE
21
bl
325
ll'-W
95 a
3b
7C
5
"AK
HLL-PLN
IND DEV HRBR
till+meta
SD-MD
Rl
.
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
cC JUNE. 197?
C'»AST*L EnVIHhnMEMAL INVENTORY
PAGE 8
»CLr"ATSLftfi
¦»CCA\prRAPHY ^iol^GV
•GEOLOGY#
0
1
ST CfloNTY
TX ARANSAS
IX BRAZ6RIA
Tx CALrieiA
TX CAMERON
tx cuAf-atPs
Tx GALVESTBN
TX HAKRIS
tx JACKS9N
TX JEFFERS0N
TX KENEDY
TX KLEBERG
TX maTAGBRCA
TX S
55
87
1
?PA
PLN
STRT SD BCH
SED
ID
27
SC
92
»50
1?SE
13Sf
5s
86
1
SPA
PLN
INO MCSH«STRT SD BRR
SED
mD-SD
28
45
91
-»50
12SE
13SE
RS
86
1
SPA
PLN
IND KRSH+STRT SD BRR
SED
MD-SD
*3
48
9C
450
12SE
10SF
SH
86
1
SPA
PLN
IND MRSH+STRT SO BRR
SED
MD
3C
<»9
91
*50
l£SE
13SF
57
87
1
SPA
PLN
INC "RSH*STRT SD BRR
SED
MD-SD
5b
+3.
9C
4?b
12N
SS
5'j
87
1
SPA
PLN
INC MRSHY BAY
SED
MD
35
47
91
-.50
USE
9Sr
£1
87
1
SPA
PLN
INC MRSh+STRT SD BRR
SEO
MD
31
4*
92
*50
12SE
13SE
59
87
1
SPA
PLN
INC fRSH+STRT SD BRR
sed
MD-SD
26
51
92
450
12SE
13SF
85
4
*
SPA
PLN
]NC HRSH+STRT SD BRR
sed
mD-SD
43
33
87
4C0
12SW
9SW
39
75
4
(¦rDCSSS
PLN
IND MRSH-tLGN+STRT BRRS+SPT
SED
SD+MD
4C
as
87
350
lCNw
RS
37
83
3
PAK-HIK
PLN
STRT+WDD SO-CLY*RK RVR BNK
SED
mD
Mb
3C
*9
ACQ
9Sfc
7S
41
83
2
«AK-PI\
PLN
STRT HRS^Y RVR BNK
SED
MO-SD
4C
29
87
350
9SU
7S
3/
83
3
pak-pik
PLN
STRT WDD SD-CLY+RK RVR BNK
SED
MD
45
31
8?
4C0
ICS!*
8S
4C
80
2
bak-pin
PLN
SLTLY+DP IND MRSH
SED
MD
3?
88
4C0
11SU
8Si*
41
81
3
"AK-PI\
PLN
SLTLY IrgC MRSM+TRC SD BCH
sed
MD-SD
"•5
31
83
4C0
1CSW
b'j».
41
8?
2
PAK-FIN
PLN
STRT-IND MRSH
SED
MD-SD
4C
30
88
375
9SW
7S
38
8?
1
"AK-PIN
PLN
IND*MDD SD-CLY HVR BNK
SED
MD
45
3C
87
375
llw
BSw
40
81
1
«AK-PIK
FLN
DP JND MRSH
SED
MD
44
3?
87
sCO
12SW
9S*
41
8C
2
"AK-PIN
PLN
DP IND KRSH
sed
MQ
45
3C
87
375
1U
8S*
40
81
1
PAK-PIN
PLN
INC MRSH
SED
MD
33
88
4C0
1?SW
9Sv
41
8C
3
HAK-PIK
PLN
INC MRSh+STRT SD BCH
SED
MD-SD
4 3
34
*7
*C0
12Sk
9S«
42
SO
3
«AK-PIN
PLN
STRT BCH+BRR+IND PRSH+LGN
SED
SD+MO
"5
31
87
375
1U
SSi*
40
81
1
PAK-PIK
PLN
IND+STRT MRSH
SED
MD
45
3C
69
hCG
•JSW
fs
41
83
2
pak-pin
PLN
STRT MRS^Y RVR BNK
SED
mD-SD
4C
29
88
J50
1 CNk
8S
38
CP
2
"AK-PIN
PLN
STRT MDD SD-CLY RVR BNK
SED
MD
4C
59
88
350
lCNw
MS
3S
K?
1
sak-fin
PLN
STRT WDD SD-CLY RVR BNK
SED
MD
4b
31
89
4C0
1CSW
8S#
41
8?
c
pak-pin
FLN
SLTLY IND MRSH+TRC STRT BCH
SED
MD-SD
43
3C
88
j75
9m
7S
39
81
2
PAK-PIN
PLN
!NC MRSH*IRR SD BCHS
SED
MD
44
31
88
4 CO
l?Sw
rJSV
4C
80
2
flAK-PIK
PLN
STRT+INO MRSH
SED
MO-SD
43
34
88
4C0
12S*
9SV-
41
80
3
PAK-PIN
FLN
IND MRSH
SED
MD-SD
43
j4
87
4C0
12SU
9SW
42
80
3
PAK-PIN
PLN
INC MRSH*STRT SD BCH
sed
MD-SD
#4
33
88
4C0
12SW
9S*.
41
81
3
PAK-PIN
FLN
STRT-IND MRSH*PKT BCHS
SED
MD-SD
-------
TABLE D-2. COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY
i
i-*
oo
23 JUM. 137?
cli^atulscy.*.... ftreAkPn»APHY
PRf
AV
Te»P
s9L
W INL)
*A TEB
^Ean
ST
C9UNTY
CIP
«IN
SO*1
kA 0
KNOTS
TffP
i-
tide
IN/YR
••n.
HA X
L/C
~ IK
3bM
*!n •
'1A *
KGE
VA
NPRretK
44
is
=.
It A
GRAYS HARtinR
9 C
36
68
jCO
12t
frK
4«
6?
7
V.A
ISLAND
S5
33
72
jCO
llSw
osw
4b
54
6
fcA
JEFFERS9N
95
3*
68
3C0
£SE
6W
4»
60
7
V.\
Kl\rj
*c
33
76
275
llSw
!JS»
47
56
#
¥iX
KITSAP
45
33
76
3C0
SSv.
7S«
*7
56
8
KA
KASCN
75
32
77
325
7Sh
6S»
48
67
11
HA
PACIFIC
85
36
68
JCO
16SE
UN
44
64
6
bA
PIERCE
45
32
77
325
11SV.
95*
48
57
9
MA
SAK JLAK
2S
33
7 J
jCO
list.
9S«
~5
5?
5
V.A
SKAGIT
3C
33
73
£75
11SV.
9S*
4b
b?
7
WA
SN9H0^ISH
3C
33
7*
325
11SW
931.
*6
54
7
MA
T^URSTOs
5C
32
77
JCO
7SW
6S*>
48
57
11
WA
rtHATCOH
35
32
7*
350
11SH
9SW
4b
5?
5
WI
ASHLAND
31
6
73
350
1?NW
10E
r*
r»
V
WI
BAYFIELD
29
7
77
£75
13k»
13E
c
c
wi
51R6WN
27
8
Bl
275
11 sw
0
c
0
WI
09 as
27
11
*0
350
1CW
93v
0
r.
c
WI
OSUJLAS
29
b
76
350
13NW
10E
|J
•v
0
WI
IRON
35
6
8C
275
12NV.
ICE
0
Ci
0
WI
KE'J3SHA
32
16
83
275
12*
JS«
0
n
0
wi
ke»a-j*ee
27
13
79
275
U*
dS*
u
*
r
WI
MANIT3WBC
23
1*
8C
275
12W
9S»
u
*
0
WI
MARINETTE
28
11
83
2/5
llw
83*
0
n
0
WI
niL«AUKEE
2S
15
82
t75
13M
10S»
c
C
3
Wi
'JC3NT8
?7
8
83
£75
llw
H3 w
c
0
VJI
9ZAJKEE
?7
1*
82
2 75
134
10S*
u
P
o
WI
HACINfc.
3C
16
82
275
131.
lo!iw
t;
c
c
>a
3MEB9YGAN
2E
1*
81
c/5
12w
9S»'
c
f.
c
*L Ei\VIRON*EMAL Inventbry
PAGE 9
BIOLOGY .........................Gf0L8GY
PJMISAM
r*ast al
rR9LBGY»*t*«
B8TT6M
vegetat
upLASC
•••••••.(•SHORELINE*********
UPLAND
SEDIMENTS
«AK-PI\
PLN
INC MRSH4STRT SD BCH
SED
MD-SO
pak-pin
PLN
INC MRSH
sed
mD-SD
»»AK-PIN
PLK
STRT SD BCH+INO MRSH
SED
SD-GR
reN
HLL-PTN
RKY HDLOS+PKT-STRT SD BCHS
SED+VBLC
RK-GR
PPR-hKL
PL^-HLL
STRT SD BCH+TRC IND MRSH
SED
SD+RK
TDK-FIH
PLN-HLL
INC SD BCHS+TRC RKY HOLDS
TILL+SED
md-rk
CON
hll-ktn
STRT+IND SD BCH+TRC RK
sed+vblc
RK
TDR-FIR
PLN-HLL
SLTLY IND SD BCH+DEV HRBR
TILL+SEO
MD-RK
rDR-FIR
HLL .
INC SD BCH*TRC IND MRSH
TILL+V8LC
>^0-RK
TDR-FIR
HLL-KTN
CP IND SC BCH*TRC MRSH
vblc^till
MD-RK
PPR-HML
PLN-HLL
STRT-IND SD BCH4-INC MRSH
sed
SD
roR-riR
HLL
STRT*IND SD BCH+TRC IND MRSH
tjll+sed
MD-RK
rOR-FIR
hLL
INC RK hDLDS+PKT BChS
till*sed
MD-RK
CDR-FIR
PLN
IRR-IND MRSH«SD-MD BCH
till+sed
MD-RK
FDR-FIR
PLN
IRR SD BCH+IND MRSH
TILL
MD-RK
CDR-FIR
PLN-HLL
CP IND SC BCH+TRC MRSH
TILL*V8LC
MD-RK
TOR-FIR
HLL
INC SD*PKT BCHS^RKY HOLDS
SEO+TILL
md-rk
SPR-FIR
PLN
IRR MRSH«SD BCHS+BRRS
TILL
mD-SD
SPR-FIR
PLN
IRR SD-GR BCHS*SPTS*RK ISLOS
SeD+TILU
sd-md
"PL-tiIM
PLN
IRR MRSH+SD-GR BCHS+SPTS
TILL
mD-SD
"PL-aiR
PLN
IRR GR-RK bch+ls lDgs-clfs
LS+TILL
sd-rk
SPR-FIR
PLN
STRT SD-GR 8CH*HI CLY BLFS
till
sd-md
FJR-MPL
PLN
ARC SD-GR BCH+CLV BLFS
till
SD-MD
C-RS
PLN
STRT SD-GR BCH+LB BNKS
TILL
SD-GR
*"PL — UIR
PLN
STRT sd-gr bch*cl* blfs
TILL
SD-MO
fPL-eiR
PLN
STRT SD BCH+CLY-SO BLFS+DN
TILL
hD-SD
fPL-elR
HLN
IRR MRSH*LB SO 3NKS
till
md-sd
~¦PL-ess
PLN
ARC SD-GR BCH+BLFS+DEV HRBRS
till
SD-GR
fPL-i3IR
PLN
IRR-STRT MRSH+LB SD BNKS
till
MD-SD
fPL-3SS
PLN
STRT SD BCH+L8-HI SD BLFS
TILL
SD
"PL-3SS
PLN
STRT-ARC SD-GR BCH*L6 BLFS
till
SD-GR
"PL-dSS
PLN
STRT SD«GR BCHS+QSS-BLFS
till
SD+GR
-------
APPENDIX E
MUNICIPAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
-------
COASTAL ZONE MUNICIPAL WASTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY REPORT
The basic source data for this report came from the EPA1s municipal
waste discharge files on special request to the STORET Assistance Branch.
The resulting data consisted of some 3,393 records representing data
extracted from the files based on a list of 325 coastal counties.
Since this data was found to be incomplete and, in some areas, either
not up to date or erroneous, the following additional processing steps
were taken:
1) The file was manually updated and/or corrected with data
available from each of the six IEC case study areas (New York
Bight, Charleston Harbor, Biscayne Bay, Pensacola Bay, San
Francisco Bay, and Washington-Oregon Coast and in other areas
where reference data was available.
2) Daily and design flows were obtained by direct contact or
reference to the literature for all records lacking this
information but showing a population served in excess of
100,000.
3) After manually updating the file as described above, a computer
E-l
-------
program was executed which summarized the data by county.
Incomplete records were either estimated for flow or population,
based on the avail-able data or were purged from the record due
to insufficient data. Table E-1 illustrates the process. The
program calculated a "percent estimated" factor based on the
population ratio of records estimated vs. ratio not estimated.
The resulting coastal municipal waste discharge summary report of table
E-2 contains data summarized by type of treatment within state and region
including a column indicating the percent of data estimated.
TABLE E-l
WASTE DISCHARGE DATA PROCESSING PROCEDURE
ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENTS
POPULATION
DAILY FLOW
DESIGN FLOW
ACTION
Yes
Yes
Yes
Record Accepted
No
No
Yes/No
Record purged
Yes
No
No
Daily & Design Flows
Estimated (1) (2)
Yes
No
Yes
Daily Flow Estimated (3)
No
Yes
Yes
Population Estimated (3)
No
Yes
No
Population (3) and Design (2]
Yes
Yes
No
Design Flow Estimated (2)
(1) Daily Flow * 100 GPD x Population
(2) Design Flow m Daily Flow
(3) Population * Daily Flow/100 GPD
E-2
-------
TABLE E-2
C6ASTAL MUNICIPAL waste DISCHARGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE. 1972 PAGE: 1
RE(iISN TYPE NP.6F P0P SERVED AVG DAILY DFSlCiNEC * EST.
STATE TREATMENT DfSCh X JCOO F LQU # MQD FL*W# MGD I^ATED
1 CT
N9NE
C
O.CC
C*CO
c.oc
0*0
MINOR
C
O.CO
C*CO
O.OC
O.C
PRIMARY
24
870.16
119*12
133.65
1.6
intermediate
1
34.9C
6 • CO
7, or.
0.0
SECONDARY
39
512.76
53*71
70.76
12.4
tertiary
1
.50
•10
.03
CtO
•T9TAL
65
1418.32
178*93
211.44
5.4
1 Mf
MOM
P
7.C3
.70
• 7C
O.C
M I NOR
C
O.CC
c.cc
C.CC
C.O
PR I MARY
12
42.63
4 • ?6
6.84
O.C
INTrPMEDIATE
C
O.CC
c*cc
O.CC
0.0
SrCONDAHY
9
51.37
4.84
8,79
O.C
TERTIARY
C
O.CC
c*cc
O.OC
O.C
•total
26
1C1.C3
9 * ?C
16.33
C.C
N0M
5
31. C«
3*11
3.11
C.O
MIN0R
7
1036.74
379»62
428.12
O.C
PRIMARY
7
12>5.5e
P6*«l
24 .4C
0.0
intermediate
C
O.CC
C*CO
C.OC
OlO
SECONDARY
918.63
139*57
135.1C
OiC
TERTIARY
C
O.CC
C*CO
C.CC
OlO
•TflTAl
2112.C3
5*9.12
590.72
O.C
r,Rk!f.
0
O.OC
c*co
O.CC
O.C
M JN'JK
c
O.CC
C-CU
c.oc
0.0
PRIMARY
1
18.CO
l.fiC
1.5C
0.0
INTERMEDIATE
c
O.CC
C.CC
0.00
0.0
Sfc-CONJARY
4
23.CO
2«3C
3.90
65.2
TERTIARY
c
O.CO
C*CC
0.00
0.0
*Tf} TAL
5
41.CO
4 * 1C
5.40
36.6
NONE
2
.37
*04
• 0*
C.C
J NO
C
O.CC
c.co
O.OC
0.0
PRIMARY
7
79.6*
12*62
14.73
10.6
INTERfEDIATE
C
O.CC
c*cc
0. OC
0.0
secondary
3
S76.26
85 * 3b
117.12
18.0
TERTIARY
C
O.CC
C.CC
O.CC
O.C
*TgT AL
lb
656.27
98.CI
131.89
17.1
E-3
-------
TABLE B-2
COASTAL MUNICIPAL waste discharge summary
13 JUNE 1972
REGION
STATE
REGION :
2 DE
2 Nj
?. NY
REGION
type
NO.OF
POP SERVED
avg daily
designed
treatment
OISCH
X 1000
FLOW, MOD
FLOW/ MOD
SUBTOTAL
38.48
. NOME
12
3*85
3.85
minor
7
1036.74
379*62
428.12
PRIMARY
51
1136.01
164*61
i81.l2
INTERMEDIATE
1
34.90
6*00
7,00
secondary
82
2082,02
285.77
335,67
TERTIARY
1
.50
• to
• 03
•TOTAL
154
4328.65
839*96
959.78
NONE
0
0.00
c.oo
0.00
MINOR
0
0.00
o.co
o.oc
PRIMARY
1
3.50
.35
*40
INTERMEDIATE
0
0.00
0»00
o.oo
SECONDARY
3
328.14
75*28
60.45
TERTIARY
0
0.00
C*0Q
0.00
•TOTAL
4
331.64
75.63
60.85
none
0
o.oo
o.co
0.00
MINOR
2
62,00
5.80
5*80
PRIMARY
72
3697,35
449.80
629.22
INTERMEDIATE
4
566,30
58»56
104.20
SECONDARY
125
1432.13
148*11
183*29
TERTIARY
0
0.00
c.oo
0.00
•TOTAL
203
5757.79
662*29
922.52
none
4
13.07
1*31
1*32
minor
0
o.co
C*00
0.00
PR I MARY
n
1368,49
101*52
144.93
INTFRMEDIATL
0
o.cc
0*00
0.00
SECONDARY
40
9554.06
983*69
1385,12
TERT IARY
0
0.00
C*CO
0,00
•TOTAL
85
10935.63
1086*54
1531.37
subtotal
13.07
none
4
1*31
1.32
MJN^R
2
62,00
5*80
5.80
PRIVARY
114
5069.3*
551*67
774.55
intermediate
4
566,30
58*56
104,20
secondary
168
11314,33
1207*C8
1628,86
tertiary
C
O.CO
0*00
0,00
•total
292
17025.06
1824*46
2514,74
PAGE g
* EST.
OtO
0.0
SiO
0*0
8.7
0.0
4#7
0*0
0.0
0.0
0«0
0*0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
OtO
0*0
o«o
0*0
5.1
0*0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0*0
• 0
5.x
O.o
OlO
0*0
O.c
O.o
• 0
E-4
-------
TABLE E-2
rSAsTAU MIMCJPA|_ * A b T E DISCHARGE SUGARY
13 JUNE 197? PAGE 3
kl.oIPK TYPE. KH.er PtfP oERVED AVCj DAILY designed a EST.
STATE TRCAT-!E\T ;,I:jCH X 1C0C FL.8W * MGD FLBW, *GD IMATED
3 OE
\p\r
C
OfOC
c.cc
o.oc
c.o
* I \-Uv
c
o.cc
c.cc
c.oc
0.0
PRIMARY
5
17.57
2 • 1C
2.58
0.0
iNTrRrroiatt
C
o.cc
c»cc
o.oc
0.0
oECftN^ARY
1C
34.31
7 • 39
10.05
0.0
TERTIARY
rs
O
O.CC
c«cc
o.oc
0.0
»T r A L
lb
bl.89
9.4
-------
TABLE E-2
COASTAL HUnICIPAU WASTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE 1972
region
state
REQJ9N
PAGE *
TYPfc NO.OF POP SERVED AVG DAILY
TREATMENT DISCH X 1000 FLOW, HQO
DESIGNED a
PLOW/ mgd
EST.
I MATEO
SUBTOTAL
*.87
.59
NONE
7
.59
1.0
MJN8R
C
0*00
c.oc
0.00
0.0
PRIMARY
Al
•$*7.87
115*62
116.63
I*i5
INTERMEDIATE
3
170*.90
261.C9
277.OC
• 1
SECONDARY
216
61*1.51
726.27
813.88
.7
TERTIARY
C
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.0
•TOTAL
267
8699.17
1103*58
1208.11
1.9
* al
NONI
0
0.00
0*00
0.00
0.0
minor
C
0.00
0*00
0.00
0.0
PRIMARY
2
35.20
2.65
*.00
0*0
INTERMEDIATE
C
0.00
c*co
o.oc
0.0
secondary
15
807.56
23*61
36.93
0.0
TERTIARY
0
0.00
0*00
O.OC
0.0
~TOTAL
17
2*2.76
26*26
*0.93
0.0
* fl
NONE
0
0.00
c.co
0.00
0.0
MJN0R
2
70.00
7.CO
7. OC
o.o
PRIMARY
3*
**7.02
61.01
111.39
22.*
intermediate
c
o.co
O.CC
O.oc
0.0
secondary
371
2581.57
2^7.62
3*8.82
.2
tertiary
3
*.02
.26
.**
0*0
•total
*10
31C2.62
315.91
*67.65
3«*
4 GA
NONE
c
o.oc
c*cc
o.oo
0.0
minor
0
O.CC
c.co
o.oc
0.0
primary
*
35 . 48
3*91
6.68
0*0
intermediate
0
0.00
c.co
o.oc
0*0
secondary
13
57.12
5.C3
7.46
0.0
tertiary
0
0.00
c*co
o.oc
0*0
•total
17
92.60
8»9*
1**1*
0.0
* MS
none
0
O.CC
c*cg
o.oc
O.o
M I NOR
0
O.CC
c.co
o.oc
0.0
primary
0
O.CC
c*cc
o.oc
O.c
INTERMEDIATE
c
O.CO
c*cc
o.oc
O.o
SECONDARY
8
151.00
1* .59
22.01
0*0
TERTIARY
0
O.CC
c.oc
o.oc
O.o
•T9TAL
8
lbl.cc
1 **59
22.01
0.0
E-6
-------
TABLE E-2
CPASTAU "1UMCIPAL WASTE DISOAKGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE 197?
PAGE
REGI9N
STATE
4 NC
TYPE
,S0.fJF POP
SERVED
AVG DAlLV
TESISNED
a est
TREAT -!E\T
DISCH X
1C0C
FU8IN. *gd
FLOW,
IMATEI
MOM
C
O.CC
C • GC
0.00
c.c
^ JN9^
C
O.CC
c»cc
0.00
c.c
PRIMARY
b
6.81
• 57
.88
0.0
INTERMEDIATE
C
o.co
c»cc
C.OC
0.0
SEC«Nf)A«*Y
29
144.59
13*83
23.22
CtO
TFRTIA3Y
C
O.CC
c.cc
o.oc
c.c
« tqtal
34
151.41
14.40
29.1C
0.0
none
3
25.93
2 • 25
2.25
C.C
MJNSK
C
o.co
c.co
o.oc
0.0
PRIMARY
3
let.37
5.20
40.15
0.0
1 NTtRMEDI ATE
C
o.cc
C'OC
o.cc
o.c
SECANQAKY
17
64.35
6*10
11.33
17.4
TERTIARY
C
0.00
c»co
o.oc
0.0
•TqTAL
23
191.65
13*54
53.74
5.8
REGI9N 4 S'JBTBTAL
N0NT
3
25.93
2*25
2.25
0(0
mjnqr
2
70.C0
7.CO
7.0C
0.0
PR I VARY
<~8
625.88
73*34
163.1C
16.0
INTERMEDIATE
C
0.00
C»CO
O.OC
0.0
SECONDARY
453
32C6.19
3lC«7a
454.77
. 5
TERTIARY
3
4.C2
.£6
.44
0.0
•TqTAL
509
3932.0*
393*64
627.57
2.9
5 IL
N0NE
1
1.00
• 1C
.ic
0.0
^INQR
C
O.CO
c.co
o.oc
0.0
PRIMARY
6
30.42
3*51
4.38
0.0
INTERMEDIATE
C
O.OC
C.CO
0.00
0.0
SEC9NDARY
47
440*68
53.52
66.75
0*0
TERTIARY
1
2.00
• 24
.26
0.0
•ToTAt
55
474.10
57*36
71.49
0.0
5 IN
N0NE
2
1.92
• 19
.19
0*0
MJN0R
C
0.00
C.CO
0.00
0.0
PRIMARY
1
.19
• 02
.02
OtO
intermediate
6
0.00
C.CO
O.OC
C«0
SECONDARY
32
566.87
118.52
149.89
0.0
TERTIARY
C
0.00
0*00
O.OC
0*0
•TOTAL
35
568.98
118*73
150.1C
0.0
E-7
-------
TABLE E-2
COASTAL MUMCIPAl WASTE discharge Sl^ARY
13 JlAE 197? PAGE 6
RCGI?\ type N0.OF PQP bERVED avg daily DESIGNED A est.
STATE TREATMENT DISCH X ICOC FLOW, MGD FLOWj MqD IMATED
5 MI
\9NE
3
75.95
7*59
7.59
CiO
MIN5R
43
1*66.17
728*07
814.59
0.0
PRIMARY
68
5623.31
801*57
265.37
0.0
I \i TERMED I ATE
1
10.66
.84
.87
o«o
secondary
61
552.15
61 * 56
84.73
0.0
TERTIARY
0
O.CO
C»CO
O.oc
0.0
~TflTAL
176
7723.25
1599•64
1173.15
0*0
5 MM
none
c
O.CO
c*co
o.oc
0*0
M IN0R
c
0.00
o*oc
0.00
0.0
PRIMARY
9
J 42»84
21*39
21*18
o.o
intermediate
0
0.00
OOQ
0.00
o«o
secondary
22
65.67
9*09
11.36
0*0
TERTIARY
1
1.74
•17
.03
OtO
•total
32
213.26
3C»64
32.57
0.0
5 NY
NONE
6
402*08
75*70
102.70
0*0
M J N0R
1
1.75
.21
• 30
0*0
PRIMARY
71
697.00
106*40
155.02
1*0
intermediate
C
O.OC
C*CO
O.QO
0*0
secondary
43
387.19
33.93
51.78
7.4
TERTIARY
3
1.12
*11
.24
0*0
•TOTAL
124
1489.14
216*36
310*0^
2.4
5 DM
NONE
8
66.12
6*61
6.61
0
MJNOR
0
0.00
C»0Q
O.oo
0
PRIMARY
7
317.02
36*92
47.85
0
intermediate
6
84.57
11.32
10.61
0
secondary
72
2298.66
232*33
221.86
53
tertiary
14
730.20
109*90
177.60
0
•TOTAL
107
3496.58
397*09
464.53
34
5 PA
none
0
o.oc
c.oo
0.00
0
minor
0
0.00
c*co
o.oo
0
primary
0
O.CO
c»co
o.oo
0
INTERMEDIATE
0
0.00
0*00
o.oo
0
secondary
10
203.13
49*88
49.45
0
TERTIARY
c
0.00
0*00
0.00
o
•T0TAL
10
203.13
49*88
49.45
0
E-8
-------
TABLE E-2
COASTAL MUNICIPAL KAaTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY
13 JUKE 1972 PAGE 7
p«:q|5n type; Ne.flF p»p served av& daily designed * est-
STATE TREATMENT DISCM X 1COO FLBW, MQD FL»W, MQD IMATED
5 wi
N0NE
4
IOC
• 13
• *3
c.o
MIN«R
C
o.cc
c.co
o.oc
o.c
PRIMARY
13
66.*1
1C»82
12.34
o.o
INTERMEDIATE
C
0*00
C.CO
o.oc
0.0
SECONDARY
75
418.10
76*68
86.67
• 1
TERTIARY
5
1017,27
187*47
162.47
0.0
•total
97
lbC3.09
275*09
261.61
.0
REli J 5 SUBT9TAL
NONE
24
548.37
90*32
117.32
C.C
M JN^R
44
1467,92
728*26
814.89
0.0
PRIMARY
17b
6S77•19
980*63
506*16
• 1
intermediate
7
95.23
12*16
11.48
o.o
secondary
362
4935.4b
635*51
722.49
2b.3
TERTIARY
?4
1752.33
297*8^
340.60
0.0
•total
(,2b
15676.53
2744-79
2512.94
8.0
6 LA
NONE
1
15.00
1.50
1.5C
0.0
MJN9R
0
O.CO
c.co
0.00
0,0
primary
2
453.CO
26*30
24.00
0.0
HTrWHtDlATE
C
O.CO
c.co
o.oc
0.0
3F-CPNDARY
49
444.73
45*33
55.49
0.0
TERTIARY
C
O.OC
r.*co
o.oc
o.c
~TOTAL
52
912.73
73*13
80.99
0*0
6 TX
NONL
c
O.CO
c.cc
o.oc
0.0
MINOR
0
O.CO
c.cc
o.oc
0.0
PRIMARY
3
12.5C
.43
1.20
0.0
INTERMEDIATE
c
O.CC
c.co
o.oc
C.C
3FC6NDARY
197
2U32.62
136*67
222.87
0,0
TERTIARY
1
1.70
c*co
.29
C.O
•T6TAL
201
2046.82
137.11
224.36
0.0
rljipn fe Subtotal
ngnc
I
15.OC
1.5C
1.5C
0,0
C
O.CC
o*co
c • oc
0.0
PRIMARY
5
465.50
26*73
25.2C
0.0
INTERMEDIATE
0
O.CC
C.CO
O.OC
0.0
SLCBNDARY
246
2477.35
182*CC
278.36
o.c
TERTIARY
1
1.7C
C*CO
.29
0.0
•T0TAL
253
2959.55
2lC *24
305.35
OlO
E-9
-------
TABLE E-2
CSAsTaU MUNICIPAL WASTE 01SCHARGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE 1972 PAGE a
REGION TYPE N6.9F P0P SERVED AVG DAILY DESIGNED A EST.
STATE TREATMENT DISCH X 1000 FLOW« MGD FLAW, mqD IMATED
9 CA
\9NE
3
6.86
• 63
* 68
OiC
MJNQR
C
o.co
c»co
0.00
0,0
PRIMARY
85
11845.97
1C76»78
1799,12
0,0
INTERMEDIATE
1
220.00
19*40
30*00
DtO
secondary
210
9118.42
861.34
1585.51
0,0
tertiary
5
26.63
3*64
5.94
0,0
•T0TAL
304
21217.89
1*61*87
3421.28
0.0
9 HI
N8NE
1 NRR
PRIMARY
intermediate
secondary
TERTIARY
•TQTAL
2
2.2C
• 22
.22
0.0
c
0.00
c.cc
o.oo
0,0
3
47.CC
3» 45
9.0C
0*0
C
0.00
C»CC
0.00
0,0
26
150.92
15*18
32.73
0.0
C
o.oc
CtCC
O.OC
0,0
11
2C0.12
18»8b
31.95
0.0
KECjIPN
L*R
'0UbTf)TAL ¦
\fl\E
5
9.C6
• 9u
• 9C
"•I.MfiR
c
O.CO
c.cc
O.OC
PRIMARY
R8
11892.97
1C8C•23
1808.12
I ¦ jTf-Rh'ED I ATE
1
220.OC
19*40
30.00
sfcrndary
236
9269.34
776.52
1608.24
TERTIARY
5
26.63
3.64
5.94
»ToTAL
335
21418.cl
IMC *72
3453.23
\QNE
1
2.95
•29
.29
M IN 9 W
C
O.OC
C«CQ
O.OC
PRIMARY
17
45.C3
6*94
9.64
1NTERMFDIATE
C
O.OC
c.co
O.OC
SEC0NQARY
51
£29.21
4 3 • 1.0
49.67
TERTIARY
C
O.GO
c»cu
o.oc
~T9TAL
69
c.77.20
5C * 40
59.6C
0.0
0.0
0,0
o»o
0*0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0.0
c«0
0,0
0,0
10 w A
none
3
13.06
1*21
1.39
MJN0R
C
o.oc
C.CU
o.oc
PRIMARY
63
11C3.40
205.72
253.97
JfvTf RMEDJATE
C
o.cc
c.nc
c.oc
SECONDARY
4?
J82.57
53.43
87.90
TERTIARY
1
1 .8b
•18
.44
»T gTAL
109
1bCO~88
2 6 C * 5 3
343.71
0,0
0,0
o»c
0,0
.4
0,-0
• 1
E-10
-------
TABLE E-2
CBAsTAU municipal WAfcTE DISCHARGE SUGARY
13 jUKt 197? PAGE 9
REGJ6N TYPE M.',9F POP SERVED AVG DAILY DESIGNED a EST-
STATE TREATMENT &ISCH X 1COC FLOW, MGO FL0W/ f
-------
APPENDIX F
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
-------
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE
Section 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this section is to describe, in detail, the basic data
sources and analytical procedures used in estimating the quantities of
industrial water discharged in coastal counties. The task was to
estimate the quantities of waste water discharged in 1970 by five of
the major manufacturing industry groups into six different types of
outlet systems in the 325 coastal counties of the 30 coastal states
of the contiguous continental United States. The problem was that
available census data listed manufacturing industry waste water dis-
charge by state only and for years prior to 1970. The solution chosen
was to use data available at the county level on the number and size
of manufacturing plants as a basis for distributing the state level
water discharge data among the coastal counties.
The sources of data relating to manufacturing industry waste water
discharge are scattered throughout several different Census Bureau
publications. The data in these publications are often derived
F-l
-------
from data bases developed from different types of censuses taken in
different years. In addition the data tabulations presented are often
incomplete due to the specific nature of the census from which they
were derived or due to Census Bureau policies concerning the publica-
tion of data that could be linked to any specific manufacturing estab-
lishment in a given geographical area.
For the above reasons the algorithm required to distribute the state
level water discharge figures among the coastal counties requires
considerably greater complexity than might first be imagined. Figure F-l,
Algorithm for Estimation of Water Discharge Data, described this pro-
cess by flowchart. The flowchart shows data set blocks and process
blocks joined to form the overall algorithm. Each block is numbered
for easy reference in the descriptive text that follows.
F-2
-------
Section 2
DATA SOURCES
The data sources will first be described. The source of water
discharge data is Bureau of the Census publication MC67(l)-7. Table
3-C of MC67(l)-7 gives, by state and industrial classification, the
industrial water discharged in 1968 into six types of discharge points.
Water discharged in billions of gallons per annum is indicated in
Block 4, by Wwxz, where w indicates point of discharge, x is the
State number and z is the Standard Industrial Code.
There are 30 states, five Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes, and six types of point of discharge, so we have a 30 x 5 x 6 =
900 element matrix. The SIC codes are 20 for food, 26 for paper, 28
for chemicals, 29 for petroleum, and 33 for primary metals, indicated
by z = 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively, w indicates the type of water
discharge point in accordance with the following:
F-3
-------
w
Type of Discharge Point
1
Total water discharged
2
Sewers
3
Surface water body
4
Tidewater
5
Ground
6
Treated before discharge
Some of the data is deleted (indicated by D) to preserve confidentiality
of the Census material. Where z appears in the data it indicates some
water discharge in that category but only a trivial amount. Where a
dash appears in the data it indicates no water discharged.
These data are converted to millions of gallons per day as indicated
in Block 26 by multiplying by 1000/365.
The source of data on number and dizes of industrial establishments
is Bureau of the Census publication MC63(S)4. This gives for each county,
the number of manufacturing establishments falling into each of four
size classes of relevance to us, see Block 2. These are indicated by
N , where i = 2 has 250 to 449 employees, i = 3 has from 500 to
ixyz
999 employees, i = 4 has 1000 or more employees. The States are in-
dicated by x, the counties by y,and the SIC codes by z. This data is
derived from a 1963 census.
F-4
-------
State totals for number of establishments by employment size are not
given in MC63(S)4 and could only be obtained by adding all the data for
all the counties in each State. This would multiply the data coding
effort by a factor of about 6. We therefore resort to use of Bureau
of the Census publication MC67(3), see Block 3. In Table 9 of MC67(3)
State and county summaries are given by SIC code for all the establish-
ment sizes of interest. This data is derived from the 1967 census.
The number of establishments in each size group i is given as
Since the N. and M, are taken from censuses 4 years apart they
ixz ixz
they are not strictly comparable. We are forced to assume that the
distribution of number of establishments by employment size was the
same in 1967 as in 1963. Fortunately this is probably an excellent
assumption for the nation as a whole, and still a good assumption for
individual States. Average numbers of employees for each establish-
ment size class are given for the 1963 data, i.e., for i = 1, the
average number of employees is 155; for i = 2, 346; for i = 3, 684;
and for i = 4, 2545. While these numbers could be checked for the
1967 data by solution of a set of simultaneous equations, the size of
such an effort precludes its use for this project.
In MC67(3) Table 7 are given summary data on total employees in each
county in 1963 and in 1967, see Block 1, These are indicated by ^ z
and ^-jyCyZ respectively. Since these data are on the county and SIC
level there are numerous deletions. If we take the ratio of P_
7xyz
F-5
-------
to P0 , see Block 11, we have the fractional change over the 1963-67
3xyz '
period of employment by county and SIC. Wherever deletions or zero
data occur we substitute a growth factor derived from MC67(3) Table 5,
see Blocks 27 and 28. These data, P7XZ and are statewide employ-
ment totals for 1967 and 1963 by SIC code. Their ratio is taken,
Block 28, and expressed as r . In the event that deletions or zero
X z
data is encountered at this level then recourse is had to a table of
C^, Block 10, which are derived from national employee growth rates
for the 1964-68 period, by SIC, for those establishments using 20
million gallons of water annually or more.
F-6
-------
Section 3
THE ESTIMATION ALGORITHM
Now the algorithm will be considered. The basic assumption is that
the water used in any county in a State will be proportional to the
fraction of the State's manufacturing establishments in that county.
Following the flowchart will clarify the calculations made in order
to achieve the desired estimate.
Blocks 7 and 12 show how from a knowledge of the number of plants in
each size class in each county, we multiply by the average number of
employees, Block 10, to estimate the average number of employees,
in each SIC in each county in 1963.
This is multiplied by the growth ratio, r , in Block 16 to get the
xyz
estimate of the number of employees in 1967.
Working on a State rather than a County basis it is possible to extend
the matrix of B to B. , Block 29. This is now multiplied by M. in
1Z 1z lxz
F-7
-------
Block 8 to get F. and summed across all establishment sizes i, Block
1XZ
13, to get F , the estimated number of employees in each SIC in each
xz
State. In Block 17 we divide by F^z to get HXyZ5> the proportions
of each State's employees in each Coastal County, by SIC. When multi-
plied (Block 18) by W , the daily water use per SIC in each State we
get W , the estimates of water discharge by County and by point
wxyzs
of discharge.
There are some refinements to be made. We know the amounts of water
discharged to tidewater, (w = 4) and we can safely assume this is only
possible in Coastal Counties. Therefore for w = 4 we can take the pro-
portion, not of all counties in a State, but only of the Coastal
Counties. This is done in Blocks 20 and 23 to get H , the propor-
xyzc r
tion of all Coastal County employees in each Coastal County, by SIC.
Then the tidewater discharge per County is calculated as before, in
Blocks 24 and 21. Knowing the water discharged into sewers, to surface
water bodies, to tidewater and to ground (w = 2, 3, 4, 5) we add these
to get the total water discharged.
F-8
-------
Section 4
SUMMARY
Careful selection of SIC codes for industries with heaviest water use
at the 3 digit level, subsidiary statistical analyses of several sorts
verifying estimation procedures and refining some estimation tabular
values, and research into other data sources all tend to validate the
procedures used here.
The results must be read for what they are however. They are estimates
and projections from Census data, based on assumptions which are very
good assumptions in the aggregate. In individual cases the numbers
may vary from the estimated values.
The estimation procedures are such as to bias the results in the
following fashion: Wherever a large discharge volume is reported, the
probability is great that the true discharge is much greater than the
estimate.
Thus some sacrifice has been made in the quantitative accuracy in
F-9
-------
order that the qualitative sensitivity shall be quite high. This
assures us that very few manufacturing discharges will go undetected,
although when a high volume discharge is reported we may not have as
precise a measure of that exact volume as for smaller volumes.
Table F-l presents the industrial waste discharge in MGD categorized by
five industrial groups and discharged to the different waters of each
state. The data is summarized at the regional level with national
totals.
F-10
-------
FIGURE F-l
ALGORITHM FOR ESTIMATION OF WATER DISCHARGE DATA
-------
TABLE F-l
IN D U 3 T R
IAL WASTE DISCHARGE
SUMMARY
13 JIAE 19 71'
*»-»*#»«»»*»-#«»#nATE
r* D I SCMA^GED
in 197C»
PGD » » « *
RCCi I P N-
Fn9D
PRIMAR'
STATE
PRPOuCTS
PAPER
CHEMICAL ^ETRUlJ*
PETALS
1 CT
DISCHARGED Tf?;
PUBLIC SE %ERS
• 5c
.17
. c
n.oc
4.84
SURFACE WATER
C'CO
5.44
12.8*
c.oc
57.88
TIOt/AlCR
c.cc
2.55
93.40
c.oc
2.86
GROUND
CiCC
o.cc
C.CC
coc
.28
~total
• *)(;
8.16
1C6»5S
c.00
65.87
TREATED
C • CO
5.95
• 56
c.oc
3.71
i me
discharged T6:
Pv^lIC Sfcfc'ERS
1 .26
.96
c.cc
c.oc
C.CC
surface water
.92
89.C3
C.CC
c.oc
O.CC
tidewater
1-72
12. IB
c.cc
c.oc
C.CC
GR9UMD
c.cc
O.CC
o.cc
c.oc
C.CC
•TOTAL
3 • 9 C
ICS.18
c.cc
C»TO
o.cc
TREATED
1 .61
10.68
c.cc
C.OC
o.cc
1 MA
DISCHARGED T0:
PUuLlC SEVERS
2- 52
,8C
• 86
c.00
.15
SURFACE wATER
3.77
P. 66
1.47
• 26
.74
tidewater
26.39
o.cc
11.39
c.oc
C.CC
GROUND
.14
.29
•17
C.OQ
• CS
•total
3?.31
9.75
13.9C
.26
.91
TREATED
.28
1.76
.41
C.OC
.C5
1 NH
DISCHARGED TR;
P-JBLIC SEWERS
c.cc
o.cc
c.cc
C.OC
C.CC
SURFACE wATER
c*co
o.cc
c.cc
C.OC
O.CC
tidewater
C.CC
c.cc
c.cc
c.00
C.CO
GRfiUND
C.CC
o.cc
c.cc
c.oc
C.CC
»TQIAL
c.cc
o.cc
o.cc
C.00
C.CC
treated
C.co
c.cc
o.cc
C.OC
C.OC
1 R1
DISCHARGED TBj
c.cc
1.12
PUbtlC SEWERS
.94
C.00
.91
SURFACE WATER
3»C7
o.co
4.49
C.00
2.74
TIDEWATER
1.15
o.cc
0.00
0.00
11.72
GROUND
C»CQ
0.00
.22
C.00
C.CC
•TOTAL
5.C6
o.co
5»g4
c.00
15.37
TREATED
C.CC
o.cc
.90
C.CO
.91
REGIftN 1 SUBTOTAL
DISCHARGED TP;
public sewers
5»ie
1.93
2.27
C.OC
5.9C
surface water
7.76
1C3»13
18.82
. 26
61.36
tidewater
29.26
14.73
1C4.85
C.00
14.58
GROUND
.14
.29
.39
C.00
.30
• T B T AL
42.33
120.C9
126.33
. 26
82.15
TREATED
1«89
18.39
1.89
c.oc
4.67
PAGE 1
>»•••« It ft
T0TAL
5.86
76. 17
98.87
• 28
181 . 19
10*25
2.2?
89.35
13.9C
O.CC
106.CS
12.29
^•32
14.90
37.77
*63
57.64
2.51
O.co
o.co
o.cc
o.co
o.cc
O.cc
2.87
10.30
12.87
• 2a
26.27
1.81
15.27
191.32
163.^i
, 1#13
37i»ia
26.86
-------
TABLE F-l
industrial waste discharge summary
13 JUNE 1972
PAGE 2
»****#¦**»***«¦** ^ater
DISCHARGED in 197Ci
MGD«**«#«
««««••«•
RLGIPN
fbqd
PRIMARY
ST ATP"
V hi 1
products
PAPER
CHEMICAL
PETROLEUM
METALS
TOTAL
£ >\ J
DISCHARGED T0:
FuefLTC SEWERS
15.2?
9.57
33,28
.53
6.C3
64.68
SUMF ACL WATER
4.97
14.66
47.93
6.83
16.51
90.90
TIDEWATER
5.45
4,82
426.70
256.44
3C.89
724.31
GROUND
5» 17
O.CC
1.97
o.oc
2.63
9.77
•TOTAL
3c»87
29.C5
505.86
263.81
56 .06
889.65
TREATED
8.79
14.35
170.7C
116.25
6*30
316*38
2 NY
DISCHARGED T9;
PUBLIC SEWERS
14.23
1.74
26.14
C.0C
4.06
46.16
SURFACE water
14.23
28.33
1C&.29
C»OC
97.29
245.15
TIDEkATER
57.66
O.CO
14.31
c.oo
2.CO
73.96
GROUND
1.49
O.CC
*32
c.oo
.46
2*28
•TOTAL
87*6C
30.C?
146.07
c.oo
103.83
367(56
treated
4*98
6.82
15.C4
C.oo
49.46
76*28
REGION 2 SUBTOTAL
DISCHARGED TO;
PUBLIC SEWERS
29.51
11.31
59.42
.53
1C.C9
110.84
SURFACE WATER
19*20
42.99
153.22
6.83
113.80
336.05
tidewater
63*11
4.82
441.01
256,44
32*89
798.27
GROUND
6»66
O.CO
2.29
0.00
3.09
12(05
•TOTAL
118.47
59.12
655.93
£63.81
159.89
1257(21
TREATED
13.77
21.17
18b«74
116» 25
55*76
392»66
3 DE
DISCHARGED TO;
3(95
PUBLIC SEWERS
.62
O.CO
3.33
C.OO
c.co
SURFACE WATEft
1.25
O.CC
4.75
o.oc
o.cc
6.01
tidewater
c.oo
O.CC
125.58
C«OC
c.oc
125*58
GROUND
.38
O.CC
C.CO
c.oc
c.oc
*38
•TOTAL
2.25
O.CC
133.67
C.OO
o.co
135.93
treated
l.cc
O.CC
7.14
C.OO
c.oc
8*14
3 DC
DISCHARGED TB;
FJbUlC SEWERS
SURFACE WATER
tidewater
ground
• TOT AL
treated
.25 C.CC
G»CC O.CC
0.00 O.CC
c.oo O.CC
.25 0.CO
O.CC O.CC
c.oo c. oo
C.CC c.oc
c.co o.oc
C.OO 0.00
C.CC C»00
C.CC c.oo
O.CC (25
O.CC 0.00
C.CC 0(00
C.CO OiCO
C.CC *25
O.CO OtCO
3 MC
DISCHARGED TBj
PUBLIC SEWERS
SURFACE WATER
tidewater
ground
•total
treated
8.3? O.CC
5.45 0.00
23.23 O.CO
2.00 O.CC
39.C2 O.CO
6.60 O.CO
. 5** • 26
18.?1 0*00
72.72 *53
0.00 0*00
91.47 .79
9.42 .53
1.72 10(83
O.CC 23«66
855.80 952 *27
O.CC 2*00
857.51 988.78
275.15 291i70
F-13
-------
TABLE F-l
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCWARGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE 1972
REGION
STATE
3 PA
DISCHARGED Tft
»**######*»####water
FfjOD
PRBDuCTS
DISCHARGED IN 1970*
PAPER CHEMICAL PETROLEUM
PAGE 3
MGD#«»«»•*«
PRIMARY
METALS
PUBLIC severs
3*65
1.26
5.94
• 53
• 80
SURFACE WATER
lQ *90
13.12
1C8.20
?4.20
2.4a
T IDEaATLR
13*48
20.7C
56,07
254.86
o.oc
GHt'liND
1.54
• C6
• 16
• 26
.41
• Tt»TAL
29.57
35.14
170.37
279.84
3.69
treated
1.26
9.27
7.20
259*59
26.69
3 VA
DISCHARGED T9;
PUBLIC SEVERS
.42
1.50
• 03
0.00
0.00
surface /.ATER
.53
79.94
8.99
0.00
0*00
TIDEWATER
1 *15
22.40
214,9b
0.00
0.00
ground
.16
.27
.03
0*00
O.OC
•TPTAL
2.25
1C4.11
224.CI
c.oo
O.OC
treated
• 63
37.39
3.90
0.00
O.OC
RE&I0K 3 SUBTOTAL
DISCHARGED T9;
PUEJ|.tC SEWERS
13.26
2.76
9.84
.79
2.52
SURFACE WATER
18.13
93,C6
140.1b
24.2c
2.48
T IDE'^Atew
37.36
43.1C
469.32
255.39
855.80
GROUND
4.08
.33
• 19
• 26
*41
•TOTAL
73.34
139.25
619.52
28C.63
861.20
tpeated
9.49
4 6*66
27.66
260.12
301.84
* AL
DISCHARGED T0;
PUBLIC SEWERS
• 1C
.18
.53
0.00
O.OC
SURFACE *ATER
• 10
239.74
58.CO
0.00
0.00
TIDE'aATER
.29
69.47
1.75
0.00
C.OO
grglnc
• C5
2.35
.30
c.oo
O.CC
•TOTAL
.54
311.73
60.59
C.OO
O.OC
TREATED
• C5
2C1.31
8.32
c.oo
0.00
4 FL
DISCHARGED ,T0 J
PUBLIC SEVERS
2*43
O.CC
.22
c.oo
0.00
SURFACE WATER
3* *64
175.66
69.86
c.oo
0.00
tidewater
2.59
190.57
106.C2
c.oo
C.OC
GFeUMC
3.52
1.94
1.08
c.oo
0.00
*Tf;T AL
45*17
368.15
177.17
c.oo
C.OC
TRP: ATED
fc .70
179.28
65 .«b
c.oo
O.OC
4 G A
DISCHARGED TO ;
• C9
P'JULIC severs
• 92
.24
e.cc
0.00
SURFACE ^ATER
.81-2
59.93
7.24
C.OO
C.OC
TIDEWATER
? .31
242.16
7C.3S
c.oo
O.CC
GROUND
oce
.85
.49
C»OC
O.OC
•TOTAL
1CJ-Q7
3C3.C4
78.36
c.oo
0*00
TREATED
• 3c
50.4R
5.5?
c.oo
C.OC
t®tal
12-20
158*89
345,ig
2*42
518,62
304,02
1.95
89 ,*6
238*50
*46
330,37
M#92
29.18
278,02
1661 ,4»7
5.26
1973,95
645.78
• 82
297,84
71,51
2*69
372,86
209,68
2»65
282,16
299.18
*•53
590,49
251,91
1.27
oSS*0©
320,86
1 • 33
391,46
56,34
-------
TABLE F-l
ISCUSTRIAL v^ASTE "DISCHARGE SUMMAKY
13 olAE VJ'7?
PE Ci I «N
GTATC
4 MS
D I SChARGEi- Ttt
Ff)0D
PRODUCTS
PAGE 4
'•~'^ATEK DISCHARGED IN 1970/ MGD«*«*###*»«####
PRIMARY
PArf-R CHEMICAL PETROLEUM
METALS
PJbLlC SEWERS
c»og
c.rc
.13
C.OO
o.cc
SLRI-ACE WATER
C'CC
o.cc
6.66
C.OO
o.oc
T IDEw'ATER
rj.CO
o.cc
.8a
c» no
o.oc
GR(?u \iD
o.oc
O.CO
• 06
C.OO
c.oc
•TOTAL
c.oc
O.CO
7.72
0.00
o.oc
treated
C.OC
o.cc
1.3b
C.OO
o.oc
TOTAL
.13
6*66
• 88
• 06
7.72
1.35
~ JC
DISCHARGED T'3:
PUJLIC Sfc>f:
-------
TABLE F-l
industrial waste discharge summary
13 JUKE 1972
PAGE
••«•»•«•»•»****WATER
discharged
IN 1970/
f^GD »»««»~ i
REGION
frbd
PRIMARY
STATE
t * 14 ¦
PRPDUCTS
PAPER
CHEMICAL PETROLEUM
petals
total
b MJ
0! SCHARGED TB;
PUBLIC SEWERS
8*56
10.42
69.81
1 .08
48.63
138.48
SURFACE WATER
12.76
77.30
139.4b
62.81
401.43
693.75
TIDEWATER
c'CO
o.cc
C.CC
o.co
O.CC
o.cc
GROUND
1.26
*63
4 . 81
c.oc
• 6 8
7.38
•THTAL
22.57
88.35
21 4 , c 3
63.9c
45c.7?
839.58
treated
4«37
37.77
6*.69
7.04
153,24
267.10
b M\
discharged
ts
PUBLIC severs
1.7C
O.CC
C.CC
C.00
1.23
SURFACE water
1-13
O.CC
C.CO
c.oc
25.71
t idewater
c»cc
O.CO
C.CC
c.00
o.cc
GR (J
.10
O.CC
C.CC
c.00
C.CC
•TOTAL
2.99
O.CC
C.CC
c.00
26.94
treated
• 8 cs
O.CC
C.CC
C.00
23,42
5 NY
DISCHARGED T0;
PUBLIC SF.WF.RS
h. 1 7
?. 77
PO.Sb
c.oc
11.27
SURFACE water
5«17
44,81
84 . 4C
c.oc
269,87
TIOEMTFR
C »C0
O.CC
C.CC
c.cc
c.oc
GROUND
.5b
O.CC
• ?5
C.00
1.28
• T PTAL
1 G »8 7
47,56
1C5.61
coo
282,4C
treated
1.80
10.79
12 . C b
c.oc
137.2C
5 cjH
DISCHARGED T0 s
PUBLIC SEVERS
3.36
• C5
52.67
1.37
25.98
SURFACE WATER
1 .38
.48
116.Cb
98.69
4^8.74
tidewater
O.CO
O.CC
C.CC
c.oc
C.CC
GRSu^JD
• ?0
.CI
1*2^
• 19
3.92
•TfiTAL
4 .93
.55
169,93
10C.P5
458.66
TREATED
2.27
.37
43,80
27-44
87.84
5 PA
DISCHARGED TO:
2.35
PUBLIC SEVERS
• 12
o.co
c«oo
,83
SURFACE wATER
.36
24.44
c. c c
. 1?
2.55
TIDEWATER
- .00
O.CC
C "CC
C.00
C.CC
ground
.05
.11
o.cc
c.00
.41
»Tf?T AL
.53
26.9C
c.cc,
• IP
3.79
TREATF.D
• C4
17.28
C.CC
1.?8
27.44
2.93
26.89
O.CO
. 1C
29.93
24.30
*0. 14.
4C4.g7
C »cc
CP
446. <»6
161•85
33 • <*3
645.36
o.cc
5.5?
734•3?
lfcl. 73
3»3Q
27.4*7
o.cc
•57
31 • 35
46.C3
F-16
-------
TABLE F-l
IMOUSTHIaL *ASTE DISCHARGE SUMMARY
13 JUNE 1972
PAGE 6
~~•~••••••~••••WATER
DISCHARGED
IN 1970*
mgd*•~••»••~•~••»
REGION
FOOD
primary
STATE
PRODUCTS
PAPER
CHEMICAL PETROLEUM
PETALS
TOTAL
5 Vi J
DISCHARGED TO!
FUULIC SEWERS
2C*93
4,87
• 4C
0.00
6*39
32*59
SURFACE WATER
?9»34
115.9*
11 »Cb
0.00
2.79
159*11
TIDEWATER
o*co
o.co
c.oc
C*00
o.oc
o*co
GROijNO
2*86
• i*
*31
0*00
.41
3*72
•TOTAL
53.11
120.94
11.76
C.00
9.58
195*41
TREATED
7.29
33.CC
3.CI
c.oo
3.C9
46*39
REGION b SUBTOTAL
DISCHARGED TO;
PUBLIC SfWtRS
8*>. CC
26.C9
153.57
4.29
109*39
378.30
SURFACE WATER
8?.46
P89.82
419.79
373.04
2327.71
3492.84
tidebater
C.CC
O.CC
o.co
c.oc
o.co
O.CC
GROUND
6*50
i.cs
7.30
2*59
21.DC
39*35
•TOTAL
173.91
316.94
580.65
379.93
2458.99
3910.48
treated
27.37
109.18
140.71
222.69
968.06
1468.50
6 LA
DISCHARGED TO;
PUBLIC Sf-WERS
6*68
.CI
• 13
0*00
O.CC
6.82
SURFACE WATER
56«C3
.38
154.71
72.66
0.00
283.77
tidewater
lC«63
O.CC
20.16
26*83
0.00
57.60
GROUND
11.87
O.CC
•71
1*68
o.cc
14*26
•TOTAL
as. 22
.38
17b.70
101*16
o.oc
362*47
TREATED
16*14
.30
15.C7
64.60
c.oc
96*12
& TX
DISCHARGED TO;
PUBLIC SEWfcRS
SURFACE WATER
tidewater
GROUND
•TOTAL
TREATED
REGION 6 SUBTOTAL
DISCHARGED TOl
PUBLIC SEWERS
SURFACE WATER
TIDEWATER
GROUND
~TOTAL
TREATED
5*62
1.00
4.9C
.88
.25
12.69
4*3l
42.61
66.89
335*50
28*55
477.86
10.C3
51.C4
3318.60
169*12
352.68
3901*47
. 66
O.CO
5*14
4.24
• C9
10*14
2C *64
94.65
3395.56
509*75
381.55
4402*15
1*47
69.1?
159.00
423*51
13.27
666*38
12.30
1.C1
5.03
.88
*25
19.51
60*35
42.99
221*60
408*16
28.55
761.63
2c • 66
51.C4
3338.76
195*95
352.68
3959*07
12.53
O.CC
5.85
5*92
' *09
24.40
105*86
95.C3
3571.26
6lC*9l
381.55
4764.62
17*61
69*42
174.C7
488*11
13.27
762*50
9 CA
DISCHARGED TOi
PJBLIC SEWERS
SURFACE WATER
TIDEWATER
ground
•TOTAL
TREATED
6C.53
7.14
4.60
4*74
8*01
16*5C
?6«89
*53
53*94
82*81
36.22
261*43
20*25
.32
2.43
1*05
142.74
1C6.76
70.14
267*7*
39*61
34.11
43.62
2*4.08
3.22
1.4C
ao.cj
1.40
26.04
H,91
80*22
33.35
25»%4
6|3i**
3 7 b 13# p. 17
-------
TABLE F-l
industrial waste discharge summary
13 jUNi. 1972
•r-:oi
T A I E
3 HT
DISCMAWGED TB
public sewers
SURFACE" ^atfr
TI'JEkATER
GRQiAC
* T 9 T A L
TREATED
»*#*»*##****»** tV
F'^;n
PRODUCTS
aTET'* DISCHARGED in 197Cj
PAPER CHEMICAL PETR^LLUm
page 7
PRIMARY
b»7*
4.5?
15 .1 1
h » 17
'6 C • 61
?6 05
O.CC
C.CC
O.CC
c.cc
o.co
O.CC
c.cc
c.cc
C. C u
c.cc
c.cc
c.cc
c. 00
toe
coc
coc
coc
coc
f-l.OK-N 9 SUBT6TAL
D I bCMAWGLD TP
1j tfR
DISCHARGED TO;
PJ0LIC SEa£9S
SURFACE MTER
T I^EwATCK
GPP^nD
»T6TAL
TREATED
1 v f- \
C I oC*-1 ARGE- TP:
METALS
C.CC
O.CC
o.oc
o.oc
c.cc
c.oc
P'JULIC r.iwEHS
6 ft • 27
7. If
4«6 L
4.74
3.22
SjRFOt V.A7ER
1 c. 6C
16.5C
- 26. £9
• 53
1 .*c
T IUE^ AT£R
U9. C5
82.81
36.22
261.*3
2C.C3
GFCVlD
?5 • 42
.32
£.43
1*05
l.*c
•TOTAL
223*35
1C6.76
7C. 1*
267.74
26.C6
TREATED
1 ? *0 ~ 6 L
3*. 1 1
4 3 » 61?
2*4.08
14.91
OB
»C 2
c. C C
coo
• C2
.57
1.12
C.cc
coo
.93
1 .72
EC. 72
C«CU
coc
o.co
.33
.c*
c.cc
coo
.CI
3*61
67.9C
c.cc
COC
.96
• feC
.72
c.cc
c.cc
.*c
Pc-JlTC SE'aE^S
F .5ft
2.13
COG
CO c
2.56
surfACE >ATF.R
b> * 27
74 . fe7
7.14
coo
7 .81
T HE^ATER
1.7?
354, 17
18.65
6 05
18.87
GRPl^D
HOC
.18
2.13
COC
.61
«T9l AL
2 C • 56
*31.16
?7 .96
tOS
29.86
TREATED
5 Or
76.C7
1.84
5.79
4.79
K-TjIRN 1C SUBTOTAL
discharged T0:
public SEWfcRS
9 . ej6
2, 15
COO
coo
2.58
SURFACE water
8t84
75,79
7.14
coo
8.74
T I')EWATER
3.**
410.89
18.69
6105
18.87
GMBUMD
2*33
.22
2.13
C.00
.62
•TOTAL
24*17
*89.C6
27.96
6 OS
30.82
treated
6»58
76.79
1.84
5* 79
5.19
••uRA^O TOTAL
DIoCWA^GtD T9:
235 .85
11.23
133.95
PuSLlC 3E«ERS
224.53
53.51
surface wAfEK
24 6*90
1182.54
1129.37
813.02
2544.04
T IDEkAjeR
2*4 .57
1226.59
4537 .88
975.26
1294.85
GRQ U"JD
6 1«23
10.96
22.51
9.82
27,81
•total
81 7»21
2*73.96
5975.63
1809.33
*000.66
TREATED
20^04
864.59
656 .67
1337.04
1363.7C
TBTAU
5.74
*•59
65, 11
5.J7
80.61
86. C5
85 .96
57 *94
519.51
30.63
69*«o5
*62•39
1»C5
2*63
5 8*44
• 38
62 • 47
1.72
13.27
97.90
399.52
*•91
515.60
9* • 46
**•29
100.5S
*57.96
5*39
578,07
96. 18
659,07
5915.91
8369.52
138.33
15C76.R8
**31.95
F-18
-------
APPENDIX G
STEAM-ELECTRIC AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX G
STEAM-ELECTRIC AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INVENTORY
This appendix presents a listing of coastal zone power plants as des-
cribed in Report 445-A, Section 2.9. The inventory is a simplified
presentation of data available on the Federal Power Commission's Form
67 for the year 1969. Table G-l presents the information obtained from
the FPC files. The following notes apply to the tabular material.
1. Blank spaces indicate that information was not available at the
time of the 1969 inventory.
2. Plant name - this column includes, where possible, the plant
name, utility name, city and state.
3. Total plant capacity - computed for all generating units in
megawatts with tenths of units rounded to nearest whole number.
4. Average cooling water - average cooling water in cubic feet per
second (cfs) is the average rate of withdrawal and discharge to
the receiving water body during the year (1969). Average rate
of consumption during the year is negligible in most cases.
Generally in condensor cooling systems that consist of mechanical
draft cooling towers, some water will be evaporated to the
atmosphere, but these are mainly located on river sites which
G-l
-------
utilize a once-through fresh water system to minimize thermal
discharge effects.
Temperature rise across condensers - temperature reported is in
degrees Fahrenheit based on the design temperature rise across
the condenser, and was computed as an average temperature of all
generating units identified.
Temperature standards - maximum allowable temperature (°F) rise
standards for receiving water for both summer and winter at the
limits of defined mixing zones as approved by the affected
state (March, 1971).
Maximum water temperatures (°F) at diversion and outfall during
winter and summer at times of peak power load.
Rate of flow through condenser - rate of flow through condensers
(cfs) was computed for all generating units identified. In all
cases once-through cooling is employed.
Average flow, receiving waters - monthly average flow (cfs) of
receiving water body during months of winter and summer system
peak power loads.
Type - the type of plant is indicated by the following code.
F - fossil, either coal or oil and N - nuclear.
-------
TABLE G-l. THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
te A'jG 197?
T»ERf A|_ DISCHARGE" [NVE*-TB*y
PAjE 1
T»TL
AVFRAQt
TEMP
CNDS
WAX
AVE RECEIVING
MAX
T
CAP
ANNUAL
CSGN
STNDS
FL9W
WINTR
WATER
FlBW
SU*MR
YR
Y
"EGA
Fl?w
CF/S
TEMP
MAX
MAX
RATE
TEMP
WINTER
SUWER
TEW
RECEIVING
ON
P
ST
C9LNTY
PL*VT NAME
.att
I ntk
DISC
RISE
T9T
RSE
CF/S
IN
ST
CF/S
CF/S
IN
CT
hATER
LN
E
A*
"SglLE
CHICKASAW "93ILE AL
r 133
0278
C278
1*
A
V
occ
00
0327
6*
76
ooocoo
016937
92
105
MOBILE RIyER
*1
F
CA
ALAfEDA
9AKLANC CA
cccc
oocc
COCC
00
c
C3C
00
0000
00
00
ooocoo
OOCOOO
CO
000
00
ca
CONTRA C9STA
PlTTS6u«C CA
OCCO
cooc
0003
00
c
ooc
CO
0000
00
00
OOOCOO
OOCOOO
CO
000
00
ca
CSNTRA CiSTA
6LEUM C*
rc8o
CQ89
0089
15
c
occ
00
0872
5*
66
OOOCCC
ooocoo
68
08o
SAN FRASCISC0
00
F
CA
CONTRA COSTA
av9*> Martinez ca
:o*o
COOC
OOCC
oc
c
ooc
CO
OOOO
CO
00
OOOCOC
oooooo
00
COO
C88LINS T8WERS
00
F
CA
C9NTRA C9Sta
CBNtra C9STA antiBCm Ca
1276
1526
1526
20
c
000
00
1*34
51
67
125C0C
125000
76
092
SAN FRANCISCO
51
F
CA
HU^39LDT
HU'-BgLCT SAY UNIT 3 CA
0C68
0115
OCCC
15
0
ooc
00
COOO
00
00
OOOCOC
oooooo
00
COO
HUMB9L0T BAY
63
N
CA
HUfeSLOT
HU*B8LCT bay EUREKA CA
;162
322*
022*
2o
0
ooc
CO
022*
52
67
ooocoo
oooooo
5*
069
PACIFIC 8CEAN
56
F
CA
LOS AK3ELE3
SCATTERG995 PLAYA DEL SAY L»
C326
C3*l
COCC
17
0
occ
00
017*
62
77
0003*1
000355
72
086
PACIFIC 9CEAN
58
F
CA
LOS ANGELES
mAvNES L5S ANGELES CA
16p6
1513
1513
IB
0
occ
00
1398
60
80
0017*8
000009
70
090
PACIFIC 8CEAN
00
F
CA
i.»S ANGELES
HARBBR STEAM PLANT *IL»-INGT8N
0389
0*23
0*£3
19
0
ooc
00
0*66
60
70
000*23
000*23
63
073
PACIFIC BCEAN
*3
F
CA
LOS ANGELES
SED9ND6 BEACH CA
1579
1759
1759
22
0
000
CO
1735
00
00
OOOCOC
OOOOOO
00
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
*8
F
CA
LOS ANGELES
l9nG Beach CA
Cl8o
00C5
oo:5
2 =
c
ooc
CO
0712
00
CO
OOOCOO
OOOOOO
00
000
PACIFIC 8CEAN
00
F
CA
L9S AN3ELES
EL SEGlNDS LBS ANGELES CA
;996
0?88
0888
22
0
coo
CO
C888
CO
CO
ooocoo
oooooo
00
OOC
PACIFIC BCEAN
55
F
CA
L9S ANGELES
ALAMIT9S Bay LQNG 6£ACh CA
1982
197c
1970
2c
0
coc
00
1911
00
CO
OOOCOO
oooooo
00
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
56
F
CA
MONTEREY
KBSS LANDING CA
3176
1178
1178
IS
0
ooc
CO
18*9
58
68
OOOOCO
oooooo
6*
07*
PACIFIC BCEAN
50
F
CA
3RANGE.
SAN 0N9FRE SAN CLE*ENTe CA
C*5o
0793
0793
ia
c
ooc
CO
0793
CO
CO
000000
oooooo
00
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
63
N
CA
8RANGE
HUSTINGT9N SEAC" CA
087c
C633
C633
23
c
ooc
CO
07**
00
CO
000000
oooooo
00
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
58
F
CA
SAN DIEC3
SA'i 8N9FRE UNIT 1 C*
3*30
078c
OCCC
18
c
ooc
CO
0000
9P
CP
000000
oooooo
QQ
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
67
N
CA
SAN DIEG0
STATI9N B SAN CIEG9 CA
0096
0121
cm
17
c
ooc
CO
0271
6*
7*
000000
oooooo
79
093
SAN DIEG9 BAY
DO
F
CA
SAN DIEG8
south bay ckila vista CA
0*7*
053C
0530
16
C
000
CO
0581
67
98
000000
oooooo
86
11*
SAN DIEQB BAY
61
F
CA
SAN DIEG9
SILVER gate Sam DIE39 CA
32*7
C216
0216
16
c
ooc
00
0327
65
90
000000
oooooo
79
098
SAN DIEGB BAY
00
F
CA
SAN DIEG9
ENCINA CARLS3AC CA
C331
0275
0275
21
0
000
CO
0321
62
90
000000
oooooo
7*
09*
PACIFIC BCEAN
5*
F
CA
SAN FRANCISCO
PBTRERB SAN FRANC I SC8 CA
0318
C5**
05**
15
0
occ
00
0*65
61
76
000000
oooooo
62
077
SAN FRANCISC6
31
F
CA
SAN FRA?.ClSC9
HUNTERS POINT SAN FRANCISC8 C
0391
2582
0582
00
0
ooc
CO
0709
58
68
oooooo
oooooo
6*
07*
SAN FRANCISCO
29
F
CA
SAN LUIS e«ISP9
H8RR9 BAY CA
1C56
1118
1118
16
0
occ
CO
1118
57
68
000000
oooooo
57
068
PACIFIC OCEAN
55
F
CA
VENTURA
MAnPALAY bxnard ca
0*35
038*
038*
23
0
occ
CO
038*
00
CO
oooooo
oooooo
00
000
PACIFIC BCEAN
59
F
CT
FAIRFIELD
STEEL P6INT STATION CT
C0»3
C229
C229
18
0
occ
CO
G152
*1
53
000218
000208
80
096
BRIDGEPORT HaR
23
F
CT
FA I LC^CSN
MILLST9NE U*IT 1 i*aTERF6RD CT
C65£
0335
COCC
oc
0
085
0*
COOO
00
CO
OOOOOO
oooooo
00
000
LONG ISLAND SO
70
N
CT
NE'v LP^DS'1'
Mpr.TvlLLE w^CASVILLE CT
olol
0238
0238
CO
0
085
c*
0000
50
70
OOOCOO
oooooo
71
088
THAMES RIVER
23
F
HADCAM EAST HAKPT9N CT
-6C0
C87c
CB7c
22
0
085
c*
0830
3*
57
008810
005S90
83
105
CONNECTICUT RJ
65
N
de
i
-------
TABLE G-l. THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
0
1
28 *U3 1972
Thecal CISCw*rGE INVfcATSRv
FA'gE 2
ST C9UNTY
DC SUSSEX
DC Washington DC
DC WASHINGTON OC
Fl BAY
FL BREVARD
PL BREVARD
Ft, BRBwARD
Fu CITRUS
Fu DADE
Fl DADE
FL DADE
FL DUVAL
FU DUVAL
pL DUVAL
FL ESCAMBIA
FL HJLLSBOR9UGW
FL HIlLSBBROUGH
Fl HILLSBOROUGH
Fl INDIAN RIVER
fl lee
Fl LEVY
Fl *BVi33E
Fl PALI BEACH
Fl PINELLAS
fl pinellas
fl paellas
Ft WAKULLA
GA CHATHAM
GA CHATHAM
ga gly^n
HI H5N8LULL
HI H9N3LULL
HI H0N0LULJ
HI MAul
II. COOK
IL LAKE
I\ LAKE
I* lake
IN LA PORTE
I"« PORTER
PLA^T *>AME
INDIAN! RlvER MILLSbSRB CE
BUZZARD POINT 3EN STa „aSH DC
BERING NW HASH DC
LANSING SMJTH lvNN HAVEN FL
INDIAN RIVER TITUSVlLLE FL
CAPE KENNEDY C8C0A Fl
PORT EvERQLADES FL
CRYSTAL RIVER RED LEVEL Fl
TURKEY P8INT F|.9RIDA CIT* Fl
MIAMI PL*nT !-lIAVI FL
CUTLER FL
SBUTHSIDE JACKSONVILLE FL
NORThSIDE JACKSONVILLE fl
J D KENNEDY JACKSONVILLE FL
CRIST PENSAC8LA Fl
P 8 KNjQHT TAMPA FL
HOOKERS POINT TAMPA FL
F J 5ANN8N TAMPA FL
VERS BEACH FL
FORT MvERS Fl
INGLIS FL
iATT INTK DISC RISE T8T RSe CF/S IN 8T CF/S CF/S IN BT hATER LN
099 INDIAN RIvER 00
096 ANACfiSTIA RIVE 33
106 ANACaSTIA RIVE 00
103 NBRTH BAY 66
095 INDIAN RIVER 60
106 INDIAN RIVER 65
103 LAKE MABEL 60
0&6 GULF OF MEXIC8 66
107 BISCAYNE BAY 67
113 MIAMI RIVER 00
112 BISCAYNE BAY 49
09# ST JOHNS RIVER 50
101 ST JOHNS RIVER 66
102 ST JOHNS RIVER 21
103 ESCAMBIA RIVER 4%
000 00
110 TAMPA BAY 48
101 TAMPA BAY 57
000 00
102 CaLOBSAHaTCHEE 58
087 WITHlACSBCHEE 00
000 00
102 LAKE WBRTM #6
q99 TAMPA BAY 00
093 TAMPa BAY 51
095 TAMPa Bay 58
0«6 ST MARKS RIVER 51
q9S SAVANNAH RIVER 00
q96 SAVANNAH river 58
" 5g
38
63
00
48
00
23
00
29
00
62
0163
C335
0335
12.0
000
00
0335
38
48
002507
002507
91
C270
C88C
0880
10.0
OCO
CO
0880
40
50
000000
000000
•0
3554
C46C
O46O
1*.0
000
00
1144
3*
47
000000
000000
90
C340
039C
0390
17.0
000
CO
0403
66
80
000000
000000
90
0258
0520
0520
10.0
000
CO
0543
65
73
000000
000000
83
C804
0998
0998
14.0
000
00
0613
73
84
000000
000000
94
1268
1786
1786
13.0
000
00
1940
83
94
000000
000000
93
0964
0573
0573
10«0
000
00
1448
59
63
000000
000000
82
0*18
1228
1228
U.C
000
CO
0613
76
88
000000
000000
92
0046
0374
0074
19.0
OCO
CO
0072
74
92
0004C6
000403
90
0346
C371
0371
16.0
OOC
CO
0484
76
93
000000
oocooo
93
0356
C337
0337
13.0
000
CO
0553
65
78
092000
092000
68
C28C
0300
03C0
10.0
OCO
CO
0323
63
81
063000
063000
84
0327
0384
0384
15.0
000
CO
0326
62
70
109000
109000
89
0281
0400
04C0
oo»o
000
CO
0000
58
70
004290
001410
90
coco
COCO
COCO
00.0
000
00
0000
00
00
OOOCOO
oocooo
00
0225
039c
C39o
15.C
OCO
CO
0327
63
82
000000
000000
89
1315
1961
1961
13.0
OOC
CO
1961
68
79
000000
000000
89
3000
C558
OOCC
OOCO
00 . c
OOC
CO
0000
6C§
CO
§§sm
000000
00
0504
05C4
12.0
000
CO
0868
81
004153
91
0054
C001
OOCl
10.0
OOC
00
0173
66
73
001400
001400
80
OOCC
OOCC
OOCO
00.0
OOC
CO
0000
00
CO
OOOCOO
000000
00
¦j74o
0916
0916
13.0
000
CO
1124
76
86
000000
000000
90
0C51
0033
0033
10»0
OOC
00
0188
64
71
000000
OOOCOO
92
0138
C173
0173
10«0
OOC
CO
0351
64
71
OOOCOO
000000
86
0494
0118
C664
0263
0664
0263
10«0
13.0
000
OOC
CO
00
08o9
0286
62
63
67
69
OOOCOO
000325
000000
000379
89
78
0118
0154
0154
11.0
OCO
00
cooo
54
60
012500
012500
84
0270
0275
0275
24.0
000
00
1772
53
67
012500
012500
82
0144
0195
0195
14.0
OOC
00
0211
6C
82
000000
oocooo
93
0394
C437
0437
11.0
OOC
CO
0000
88
98
OOOCOO
oocooo
89
0163
024*
0244
10.0
OOC
CO
0160
90
99
OOOCOO
OOOCOO
89
C168
01*1
C141
lOiO
OOC
CO
0457
82
93
OOOCOO
000039
OOCOOO
92
0338
COOC
COCO
16.0
000
CO
0081
73
92
000031
73
0025
C031
0031
12.0
OOC
00
CCSl
45
57
000000
000000
78
10*3
1126
1126
12.0
OOC
00
1948
49
61
OCCOOO
000000
79
m
ooco
OOCO
OC.O
000
CO
0000
1850
00
CO
000000
000000
00
OCOC
OOCC
ICO
OOC
CO
51
71
000000
000000
7*
OCCO
0000
0000
00.0
OOC
CO
0000
00
00
000000
OOCOOO
00
0*16
C512
0512
15.0
OOC
CO
0685
43
62
000000
000000
70
lis turtle river
098 PEARL HARBOR
099 pacific bcean
096 PACIFIC ocean
090 pacific scean
091 LAKE MICHIGAN
091 LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
000 .
005 LAKE MICHIGAN
-------
TABLE G-l. THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
SB AUG 1972
THERMAL DISCHARGE ^vE^RY
PAGE 3
T9TL
avFRAGE
TEMP
CNDS
MAX
AVE RECEIVING
MAX
T
CAP
AN\uAL
DSGN
STNOS
FL0W
WINTR
WATER
flbw
SUMMR
RECEIVING
YR
Y
MEGA
flb*
CF/S
TEMP
max
max
RATE
TEMP
WINTER
SUMMER
temp
ON
P
ST
COUNTY
PLANT name
»ATT
int«
DISC
RISE
T9T
rse
CF/S
IN
8T
CF/S
CF/S
IN
8T
WATER
LN
E
LA
ORLEANS
KAR
-------
TABLE G-l. THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
0
1
ON
T9TL
avcrage
TEMP
CNDS
MAX
*VE RECEIVING
MAX
T
CAP
ANNJAL
DSGN
stnds
FLOW
wINtR
water
flow
SU*MR
YR
Y
mega
flo*
CF/S
TEMP
MAX
max
RATE
TEMP
WINTER
summer
TE*P
RECEIVING
ON
P
ST
COUNTY
PLANT name
'*ATT
I NTK
DISC
rise
TOT
RSe
CF/S
IN
OT
CF/S
CF/S
IN
OT
kATeR
LN
E
MI
MUSKEGON
S C COBB MUSKEGON Ml
3510
0696
0696
1*
0
000
CO
0903
*0
61
OOCOCO
000000
80
097
MUSKEGON LAKE
48
F
MI
OTTOWA
HARBOR ISLAND GRAND HAVEN MI
0000
oooc
OOCO
00
0
000
00
0000
00
00
OOOCOO
000000
00
000
00
*1
ST, CLAIR
PORT HURON MI
ocoo
0000
OOCO
00
0
000
CO
0000
00
00
000000
OOCOOO
00
000
00
MI
ST• CLAIR
MARYSVILLE MI
C300
0885
0885
11
0
000
00
10*7
35
47
OOOOCO
000000
64
070
st clair river
22
F
VAN BU'EN
PALISADES SOUTH HAVEN
f(70C
C89?
OOCO
28
0
000
00
oooc
00
00
000000
000000
00
000
LAKE MICHIGAN
71
N
MI
WAYNE
WYANDOTTE Ml
0000
cooc
OOCO
00
0
000
CO
0000
00
00
OOOOCO
000000
00
OCO
00
MI
WAYNE
BEACON DETROIT Mj
0000
oooc
OOCO
00
0
00c
CO
0000
00
00
OOOCOO
000000
00
coo
00
MI
WAYNE
TRENTON CHANNEL TRENTON mi
10?6
14CC
i*co
13
0
000
00
2132
*2
50
000000
000000
69
08*
DETROIT RIVER
24
F
MI
WAYNE
*vandotte north mi
0C54
cl5?
Cl 13
00
0
000
00
0000
*2
62
000000
OOCOOO
70
090
DETROIT RIvER
*0
F
f I
WAYNE
RIVER ROUGE 11
0933
10C7
10C7
15
0
OOC
CO
100*
*1
5*
000000
000000
70
085
DETROIT RIVER
56
F
MI
WAYNE
PENNSALT RJVERVlEW MI
0037
0027
0025
oc
C
000
CO
0000
*2
62
OOOCOO
COOOOO
70
090
DETROIT RIVER
00
F
MI
WAYNE
DELRAY DETROIT "I
0375
0775
0775
00
0
OOC
CO
0000
39
66
000000
000000
70
089
DETROIT RIVER
29
F
MI
WAYNE
CODERS CREEK DETROIT «I
C5B5
08CC
08C0
17
0
000
00
l«0
38
48
OOOCOO
000000
67
0?7
DETROIT RIVER
18
F
MI
WAYNE
mISTERSKY DETROIT Ml
Ci74
0?Ci
CgCi
lc
0
OOC
00
0**3
3*
44
OOOCOO
000000
75
085
DETROIT RIVER
26
F
fN
Lake
TWg HARBORS *N
OOCO
0000
coce
00
0
000
CO
0000
00
CO
000000
000000
00
000
00
M.N
ST. L3UIS
m L HIbb*RD OULUTH -n
0122
036*
036*
2c
0
OOC
00
0356
33
50
OOCOOO
OOCOOO
53
065
LAkE superior
31
F
MS
HARRISON
jack watson gulpport ms
0595
0752
0752
15
0
OOC
CO
0683
57
73
0012*0
00C295
94
110
BILOxI BAY
57
F
NH
R9CKINGham
damel st Portsmouth k*-
OOCO
COOC
COOC
00
0
000
00
(3000
00
00
000000
000000
00
000
00
NH
R9CT0RY
PAGE *
-------
TABLE G-l. THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
28 AUG 1972
thermal DISCHARGE INvEvT0Rv
PA3E 5
TBTL
AVERAGE
TEMP
CNDS
PAX
*ve receiving
MAX
T
CAP
annjal
DSGN
STNDS
FL8W
WINTR
water
flow
summr
YR
Y
"EGA
FL8»
CF/S
T£fP
*AX
max
RATE
TEMP
WINTER
SUMMER
TE^P
RECEIVING
6N
P
ST
CBUNTY
PLANT sa^e
WATT
INTK
DISC
RISE
T9T
RSE
CF/S
IN
8T
CF/S
CF/S
IN
6T
WATER
LN
E
NY
M9NR9E
R9CHESTER 7 NY
C253
025C
C25C
19
c
ooc
00
C255
35
67
000000
000000
79
099
lake 9NTARI9
00
F
NY
*9nR9E
ROCHESTER 3 NY
CllC
c occ
OC C 0
19
0
oco
CO
0126
00
00
000000
000000
00
000
GENESEE RIVER
00
F
NY
MBNRBE
ROCHESTER 3 NY
C206
C019
0018
16
0
000
CO
C163
*0
60
003C32
001907
80
099
GENESEE RIVER
00
F
NY
NASSAU
GLENwBBC GlENW"9d LANDING nv
C38o
0368
0368
IS
0
000
00
0590
00
00
000000
oooooo
00
000
L8NG ISLAND SB
28
F
NY
NASSAU
E F BARRETT ISLAND "ARk NY
"375
0*1?
0*12
OC
0
ooc
00
0217
00
00
000000
000000
00
000
H8G ISLAND CHA
56
F
NY
NEW Y8Rk
kATERSICE NEW Y3R« NY
C712
3726
0726
1C
0
000
CO
0000
57
76
000000
oooooo
78
q9o
EAST RIVER
19
F
NY
new Y8R<
SH^rmAn CREEK NE» Y3RK nY
1216
C2*6
C2*6
1C
c
000
CO
0782
52
6*
000000
oooooo
77
090
HARLEM RIVER
19
F
NY
NE« Y9R<
east RIVER n*
3834
10*8
10*8
15
0
ooc
00
1590
5*
69
000000
oooooo
75
085
EAST RIVER
26
F
NY
NE» Y8»<
7* Th ST °LANT NE* YORK NY
S269
03*5
03*5
07
c
000
00
0760
59
63
000000
oooooo
72
075
EAST RIVER
00
F
NY
ne* veR<
59 TH ST Plant new Y8R< NY
C184
0202
02C2
07
0
ooc
CO
0589
57
65
015500
008000
80
088
HUOSBN RIVER
00
F
NY
9S»EGB
BSwEGB NY
rooc
COCO
COCO
OC
c
ooc
CO
0000
00
00
000000
oooooo
00
000
LAKE 8NTARIB
00
NY
BS'wESe
MNE mile PT UMT 1 SCRIBA ny
C5CC
0558
COCO
00
0
000
00
0000
00
00
000000
oooooo
00
000
70
N
NY
CUEENS
FAR RBC
-------
TABLE G-l.
THERMAL DISCHARGE INVENTORY
0
1
00
ZS AUG 1972
TSE.RXAL DISCHARGE INVE'-TP^Y
P*U£ 6
St cs^nty
Pa PHItADELBHI*
SI NE»'P9RT
SI PR8VIDE\CE
SI PR8VICENCE
RI PR9VICE\CE
SC OARLE.ST9N
SC hsrRY
Tx CAr.tSSN
TX GAuVESTeN
TX HARRIS
Tx HARRIS
TX HARRIS
TX NUECES
Tx NUECES
Tx 8RANGE
VA PRINCE *ILl1Aw
va yjs<
VA C^FSAP£AiC ST N£*P6RT RI
S9jTm ST PRPVI3ENCE si
MANCHESTER ST PR9vHEN.CE RI
PA-TjCkET \3 1 RI
JEFFRIES M6\CtcS C8RNER SC
HAotSD CHA*lEST?N SC
C '¦"< GRAINGER C^NwaY SC
a«3*N3vlLL£ Tx
P m R99lNSa\ 9*CLIFF Tx
wEBSTER TX
SA" 3ERYR?> LA °f?RTE Tx
3A3LE ST u3uST9S Tx
V.UECES BAY C9RP„S C-iRISTl Tx
i.6\ Wjt-L C9R°U3 C^RlaTI TX
SABINE ?RI23ECItY Tx
p»SSL'1 ?9INT STA Ou'FRIeS va
YCRKT9*N °aR STA YBR0
14.0
14.C
16 « 0
1C . C
OC.O
OC.O
oc.c
oc.c
OC.O
OC«C
OC.C
19.0
00. c
oc.c
3l »C
13.0
09.0
09. c
07 • 0
12.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
TEMP CNDS HAX
STNOS FL8W nINTR
"IX max RATE TEMP
T9T RSE CF/S IN 9T
Ave receiving *ax
WATER PL8W SUMMR
W1NTES SU^ER TE^P
CF/S CF/S IN 9T
T
YR y
RECEIVING 8N P
hates LN E
OOC
ooc
OOC
ooc
occ
ooc
000
000
ooc
ooc
occ
ooc
occ
ooc
ooc
ooc
ooc
ooc
ooc
ooc
occ
ooc
coc
occ
occ
oco
ooc
ooc
000
ooc
occ
ooc
oco
ooc
ooc
000
occ
oco
occ
000
00
CO
88
00 0872
00 0000
CO 0399
CO 0120
CO 0095
CO 0384
CO C201
00 0090
CO 0000
CO 0000
CO 0000
CO OOCO
00 0199
00 0378
CO 0689
CO 1310
05*3
0447
0696
0695
co oioo
cc 0000
CO 0000
CC 0131
CO 0000
CO 0000
00 0000
CO 0000
CO 0000
CO COOO
CO 0000
CO 0125
CO 1760
CO 0245
CO 0960
CO 0215
CO 0526
00 0906
CO 0404
CO 1261
53 68 09600C 096000 88 101 DELAWARE RIVER
NARRAGANSETT B
NARRAGANSETT B
PAWTUCKET RIVE
C8BPER RIVER
ASHLEY RIVER
WACCAMA* RIVER
00 CO
52 69
52 64
54 74
48 54
49 54
52 57
00 CO
00 00
00 CO
CO CO
CO CO
73 85
00 00
76 89
47 66
52 70
33 47
55 70
45 55
00 CO
00 CO
48 4a
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
54 72
37 48
37 46
38 50
48 58
41 67
80 95
80 92
80 95
OOOCOO
000262
000360
000000
021200
000000
003302
000000
000000
oocooo
000000
000000
000000
OOOCOO
001158
010780
00l85o
000000
OOOC54
000040
OOOCOO
000000
coooco
000000
000000
OOCOOO
000000
000000
000000
OOOCOO
OOOOOC
000000
000000
000000
OOOCOO
000000
001004
000404
000838
oooooo
000262
000360
000095
011205
oooooo
000625
oooooo
oooooo
OOOCOO
OOOOOO
OOOCOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
001158
004210
001730
oooooo
000034
OOOC25
OOOCOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOO
oooooo
oooooo
OOOOOO
oooooo
oooooo
oooooo
oocooo
001004
000404
000838
00 000
78 095
78 090
80 110
85 093
87 103
82 090
00 000
CO 000
00 000
00 000
00 000
89 104
00 000
91 106
88 107
87 105
91 105
93 108
87 096
00 000
00 000
58 000
00 000
00 COO
00 000
00 000
CO 000
00 000
00 000
74 $97
61 o*l
61 0&9
64 075
6o 0*7
68 084
80 095
80 092
80 0*5
SHIP CHANNEL
SHIP CHANNEL
SABINE lake
P8T8PAC RIVER
YORK RIVER
P8T8MAC RIVER
ELIZABETH RIVE
ELIZABETH RIVE
LAKE MICHIGAN
N8RTH HEN6MBNE
I.AKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
LAKE MICHIGAN
BAY ATLANTIC 8
BAY CARIBBEAN
BAY ATLANTIC 8
25
00
18
41
00
53
47
66
00
00
00
00
00
40
54
00
48
57
49
53
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
71
00
00
00
59
53
00
35
31
00
00
00
-------
APPENDIX H
OCEAN DUMPING INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX H
OCEAN DUMPING INVENTORY
INTRODUCTION
Information for this inventory was obtained by telephone and confirmed
by a mailed form from the responsible U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
district offices. Information for the Chicago, St. Paul, Baltimore, and
Anchorage districts was only acquired over the telephone and not by
letter. From the data reported, with the exception of dredge spoil, the
total tonnage of materials dumped in the ocean by the United States should
decline from about 10 million tons in 1968 to 8 million tons in 1972.
Tables H-l through H-4 present the information obtained for each major
coastal area of the United States.
SUMMARY OF DUMPING OPERATIONS
Atlantic Coast - Dumping of wastes (excluding dredge spoils) has been
significantly reduced in the past few years. Six dumping operations
occur off the Atlantic Coast, which includes sewage sludge (New York,
Philadelphia); waste acids (New York, Delaware); construction and
demolition debris (New York); and chemical wastes (New York, New Jersey),
and wrecks.
H-l
-------
Gulf Coast - Some industrial wastes may be dumped in 1972. The other
material to be dumped will be dredge spoil.
Pacific Coast - It was anticipated that by 1972, the only dumping operations
in the Pacific Ocean (excluding dredge spoils) with any possibility of
being continued consists of about 20,000 tons of cannery wastes which are
dumped on a seasonal basis between June and October.
Great Lakes Region - The only dumping reported is dredge spoil.
H-2
-------
TABLE H-l. ATLANTIC DUMPING SITES INFORMATION
Location
Size (sq mi)
Depth (ft)
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
# NEW ENGLAND DIVISION
44° 14', 6b° 55'
Not specified
96
1.000
Dredge Spoil
Pvt lnd fc COE
COE
No comprehensive
44° 12', 69° 01'
186
3,250
surveillance or
monitoring program
44° 07', 69° 03'
144
1, 500
has been established,
to date, for these
44° 16'. 68° 58'
l
-------
Table H-l. Atlantic Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Size (sq mi)
Depth (ft)
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
NEW YORK DISTRICT (Continued)
Chemical Waste
(Toxic) - 106 nm,
145° 00' true from
Ambrose Light
Not specified
6000
104,520
Chemical waste
Pvt lad & COE
Supervisor of
New York Harbor
Inspector assigned to
accompany vessel to
dumping area
Wreck Dumping
Ground — 14. 3 nin
168° 30' true from
Ambrose Light
200
3,000
Wrecks
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT
38° 45' 06", 74° 47' 03"
Center Point
2.6
40
121 (mi?)
Sewage sludge
Manic ipalitics
of Philadelphia
and Camden
None - area beyond
3-mile limit.
Franklin Institute
Research Lab was con-
ducting monitoring for
the City of Philadelphia.
No specifics on study.
Monitoring ireq copy
of Tug Master Log)
38° 30' to 38° 35'
74°15' to 74° 25'
120
144 (nig)
Neutralized
arid waslos
Dupont Edge-
more Co. ,
Edgemore
None - area beyond
3-mile limit.
Was monitored, no
longer is. Monitoring
(req copy of Tug
Master Log)
38° 20' to 38° 25'
74° 10' to 74° 20'
150
2 (my)
Industrial salt
waste
Industrial-
Rollins & Pearl,
Wilmington,
Delaware
None - area beyond
3-mile limit.
Monitoring (req copy
of Tug Master Log)
38° to 38° 20'
73° to 73° 30'
6,000
. 8 (mg)
Arsenic solution
None -
Industrial
None - area beyond
3-mile limit.
Monitoring (req copy
of Tug Master Log)
Cold Spring Inlet,
. 1 mi at sea
20
22,000
Sand (hopper
dredge)
COE
COE
None
Absecon Inlet,
1. 2 mi at sea
20
150.000
Sand (hopper
dredge)
Manasquan River,
. 2 mi at sea
20
31,000
Sand (hopper
dredge)
"
BALTIM
DRE DISTRICT
Chesapeake Bay -
Vicinity of
Poole's Island
Not specified
35
Site used
intermittently
Open water
disposal in
Chesapeake
Bay will pro-
bably end in a
year and a half.
Silty sand which
contains oils,
greases and trace
metals.
NORFOLK DISTRICT —
2-1/4 miles east of
B
38
2.000,000 (tons)
Sand
••
In place measurem»nt
Dam Neck, Va.
by hydrographlc survey
16 miles N. E. of
4
63
600,000 (tons)
Silt and sand
Cape Henry, Va.
H-4
-------
Table H-l. Atlantic Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Size5
-------
Table H-l. Atlantic Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Size (sq mi)
Depth (ft)
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT (Continued!
1 ¦
Port Everglades Hbr, Fla
26° 05' 50", 80° 05' 45"
0. 1
24
5,000
Sand and shell
COK
KI»A
See note - applies to
San Juan Hbr, P.R. /
all sites.
18° 30', 66° 30'
0. 01
99
20,000
Mud and sand
St Augustine Hbr, Fla
29° 54' 00", 81° 16'
0.01
34
2,000
Fine sand
29° 54' 20", 81° 15'
0.3
36
St. Lucie Inlet, Fla
27° 09' 40", 80° 09'
0. 1
11
50,000
Sand and shell
/Puerto Rico - dump site for refuse waste located approximately 15 miles olfshore (no information on specific location)
H-6
-------
TABLE H-2. GULF OF MEXICO DUMPING SITES INFORMATION
Location
Size (sq mi)
Depth [ft
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monituriri}; Program
Information
.JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT
-
Charlotte Hbr, Fla
26° 39' 15", 82° 18' 30"
0. 7
29
250.000
Silty sand/shell
COE
EPA
See note - applies to
all sites.
Tampa Hbr, Fla
27° 37' 40", 82° 50' 45"
27° 32' 40", 82° 50' 45"
27° 35' 35", 82° 44' 35"
0. 9
0. 9
0. 5
24
32
28
115,000
Poorly graded
sand and shell
••
MOBILE DISTRICT
South of Mobile, Ala
30° 09' 30", 88° 06' 00"
0. 8
44-48
827, 388
(1971)
Dredge Spoil
(Hopper dredge)
"
COE
None
Southeast of Gulfport, Miss
30° 10' 00". 89° 00' 00"
30° 10' 00". 88° 57' 00"
2 sites
(1)0.4
(2] 0. 5
23-32
370,089
(1971)
South of Pensacola, Fla
30° 16' 30". 87° 19' 00"
0. 1
33-44
1. 561, 323
(1971)
••
"
"
South of Pascagoula, Miss
30° 11' 30", 88° 33' 00"
0. 2
32-40
342,542
(1971)
"
"
"
"
South of Panama City. Fla
30° 07' 00". 85° 45' 30"
0. 5
40
1,089.306
(1969)
"
"
Port St. Joe. Fla
29° 49' 00", 85° 23' 30"
29° 50' 00", 85° 29' 00"
29° 53' 00", 85° 31' 00"
3 sites
(1) 0.2
(2)0.1
(3) 0.15
Unknown
64,484
(1967)
South of Carrabelle, Fla
29° 41' 00", 84° 37' 00"
29° 40' 00", 84° 39' 00"
2 sites
(1) 1
(2) 1
36-42
Unknown
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT
Calcasieu Pass,
Area A
29° 45'. 93° 21'
1
6+
--
Dredge Spoil
•*
-
Area B
29° 45', 93° 20'
1
6+
"
M
"
"
Area C
29° 42', 93° 21'
5
18+
"
"
"
"
"
Area D
29° 35'. 93° 17'
5
181
—
"
"
Area E
29° 29', 93° 14'
--
36+
--
"
"
"
"
Southwest Pass
28° 52', 89° 31'
—
45+
--
"
"
"
Southeast Pass
29° 03' 88° 58'
—
35,
--
"
"
"
"
Mississippi River
Gulf Outlet
29° 32'. 89° 11'
38+'
"
NOTE: Routine predredging assessment during dredging, sampling, and monitoring
projects. (Includes turbidity, biota, flora and fauna, bottom sample analys
; periodic post dre<
s and water quality
ging evaluation on all
)
H-7
-------
Table H-2. Gulf of Mexico Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Size Isq ml)
Depth (ft)
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
UstnK Anenciee
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued)
Waste Disposal Area
Very lar^e
2400
15,000 T
Sodium calcium
Amoco Chem-
COE
None
28° 10\ 89° 25'
[800 bbl/raonth
(55 gal drams)}
. Etftyl Corp
GALVESTON DISTRICT
Off Sabine Pass, Tx
Area A
app 5
24
Dredge Spoil
COE
COE
None
29° 37', 93° 50'
Area B
app 3
30
--
<•
29° 37', 93° 46'
Area C
app 4-5
6
29° 40', 93° 51'
Off Galveston* Tx
Area A
app 2-1/2
36
—
"
"
29° 19', 9i° 40'
Area B
app 2-1/2
30
--
29° 20', 94° 39' 30"
Area C
app 7-8
36
..
29° 17', 94° 40'
Area D
app 6
12
"
..
29° 22', 94° 43'
H-8
-------
TABLE H-3. PACIFIC DUMPING SITES INFORMATION
Location
Si7.e (sq mi!
Depth (ft!
Usage
leu yds/yr>
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
ALASKA DISTRICT
No f ormal Information Rre
eived; 3 .sites being used, no monitoring being conducted.
SEATTLE DISTRICT
Anacortes Harbor
2 sites
Unknown
2 sites
(1) mo
(2) 120
Varies
Dredge spoil
COE
COE
None
Bcllingham Harbor-
site in Bellingham Bay
Alternate site -
48° 31' 42", 122° 40' 42"
Unknown
Grays Harbor
46° 56'. 124° 07'
30-36
Wlllapa Harbor
46° 42', 124° 10'
90
"
"
PORTLAND DISTRICT
MCR (Mouth of
Columbia River)
46° 14' 27", 123° 57' 00"
6 acres
50
200.000
2% medium sand
98% fine sand
not polluted
MCR (Columbia River)
46° 11' 27", 123° 55' 30"
1 acre
50
30.000
2% medium sand
98% fine sand
not polluted
MCR
46° 12' 00" 124° 09' 00"
0.1
125
100,000
2% medium sand
98% fine sand
not polluted
MCR
46° 14' 10". 124° 10' 30"
0.3
130
1. 525.000
2% medium sand
98% fine sand
not polluted .
Tillamook Bay Entrance
45° 34' 02". 123° 59' 11"
29 acres
90
48.000
2% coarse sand
6% medium sand
92% fine sand
not polluted
*t
Yaquina Bay and
Harbor Entrance
44° 36' 20", 124° 06' 40"
0. 2
60
666.000
5% medium sand
95% fine sand
not polluted
Sluslaw River Entrance
44° or 23". 124° 09' 22"
0. 2
70
136.000
5% medium sand
95% fine sand
not polluted
• i
Umpqua River
43° 41' 22", 124° 10' 44"
2 acres
35
57,000
30% medium sand
70% fine sand
lightly polluted
t •
Umpqua River
43° 44' 40", 124° 09' 00"
2 acres
35
57,000
30% medium sand
70% fine sand
lightly polluted
M
Cooe Bay Entrance
43° 21' 00", 124° 22' 17"
0. 2
60
730,000
14% medium sand
86% fine sand
not polluted
1 '
Coos Bay Inner Channel
43° 21' 57", 124° 18' 35"
5. 5 acres
55
62,000
2% coarse sand
22% medium sand
76% fine sand
not polluted
II
H-9
-------
Table H-3. Pacific Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Sine *sq mil
Depth Cft>
UaaRe .
(cu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Hegulatinn Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Prograrr
In/ormatlon
Coos Bay Inner Channel
43° 23' 53". 124° 161 56"
Coos Bay Inner Channel
43° 25' 26", t24°14* 44"
Coqullle River Entrance
43° OT 30", 124° 26' 35"
Rogue River Entrance
42° 24' 00", 124° 27' GO"
Chetco River Entrance
42° 01* 50", 124° 16' 12
(6000* south of San
Francisco Main Ship
Channel)
lone ralle west of west
end of south |etty at
Humboldt Bay)
40° 46', 124° 16'
1500' dia.
PORTLAND DISTRICT (Continued)
61,OOG
16U.OOO
42. 200
81,500
Used t yr and
24,000 cu yd
material was
placed in dump.
Ail estimated
45,000 cu yd
wU\ be
deposited in
riur-ip annually-
13% medium sand
line sand
2'.?, hIU and clay
riot polluted
2% (ine gravel
2% cu»rne sand
7% medium sand
tt8% fine sand
VX sill and clay
lightly polluted
2% medium sand
98% fine sand
lightly polluted
3% coarse gravi-l
10% tine gravel
13% coarse sand
39% medium sand
35% fine sand
not polluted
a% coarse gravel
15% fine gravel
5% coarse sand
20% medium nut id
52% fiat- sand
not polluted
SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT
900,000/year
(S. F. Main Ship
Channel Mainte-j
nance)
1,300.000/year
(5. F. Main Ship
Channel deepen-
ing to 55')
Sand
-------
Table H-3. Pacific Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Size l.eq ml)
Depth (ft)
Usage
icu yds/yr}
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT (Continued)
Monterey Bay
Undefined
60 min.
90,000
Sand & silt
COE
COE, California
Whom: COE
(1000' offshore of
(3 years)
(Contract
Regional Water
Frequency: 3 years
Moss Landing)
Dredge Spoilt
Quality Control
Board
Parameters: 1. COD
2. Volatile Solids
3. Grease-oil
4. Kjeldahl Nitrogen
5. Lead
6. Mercury
"7. Zinc
Data Flow: EPA
20 miles offshore
Undefined
264
20, OC'O tons
Cannery Wastes
Cannery Plant
COE. California
Sampling is required
off Golden Gate Bridge
(seasonal)
Regional "Water
by slate regional
and Farallon. Is Lands
Quality Control
Control Boards
37° 351, 122° 50'
Board
LO& ANGELES DISTRICT
Four areas where
--
--
Dredge Spoil
COE
COE
None
dredging is occurring;
however "the spoil is
dumped on the beach
[1] Oceanslde
(2/ Ventura
;3 > Channel Islands Hbr
Santa Barbara
Dredging aUo occurring
at San Diego - no
specifics on exact
location
HONOLULU DISTRICT
JI° 14.5'. 157° 54. 5'
1
1,620
110,000
Dredge spoil
COE, State of
COE
Volatile solids
3 nil off Honolulu Hbr
HI, Private
contractors,
and U. S. Navy
chemical oxygen
demand
oil and grease
total Kjeldahl
nitrogen
mercury
lead, zinc
21° 55.4'. 159° 17.3'
1
2, 760
50,000
Dredge spoil
COE, State of
COE
Volatile solids
3 mi otf UawiliwilJ Hbr
HI, Private
contractors,
and U. S. Navy
chemical oxygen
demand
oil and grease
total Kjeldahl
nitrogen
mercury
leao, zinc
21° 50. 5\ 159° 36.0'
1
5,100
SO, 000
Dredge spoil
COE. Stale or
COE
Volatile solids
3 ml ofi Port Allen
HI, Private
contractors
and U. S. Navy
chemical oxygen
demand
all and grease
total Kjeldahl
nitrogen
mercury
lead, zinc
All sampling ts
done on a job-
by-Job basis.
H-ll
-------
TABLE H-4. GREAT LAKES DUMPING SITES INFORMATION
Location
Size (sq mi)
Depth (ft)
Usage
(cu yds/yr)
Damp Material
Usinu Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
DUFF/
ILO DISTRICT
Lake Eric
14 mi Az 67° [rom
Sandusky Hbr,
OH Pierhead Light
1
35
Used infre-
quently when
bedrock is
excavated
from harbor
Rock
Buffalo District
COE
Uuffalo District COE
Par: water depth
freq as needed
by: Buffalo, Dist COE
3-1/4 mi 11° 15'
from Sandusky Hbr,-
OH Pierhead Light
2
30
600,000
Earth
3 mi Az 0° from
Huron Hbr
OH Light
1
35
200, 000
Earth
2 mi Az 0° from
Vermilion Hbr.
OH East Pierlight
0. 25
35
Mot used last
25 yrs
Earth
4 mi Az 351° from
Lorain Hbr, OH W.
Breakwater Light
2. 5
35
300,000
Earth and Rock
1-1/4 mi Az 0° from
Rocky River Hbr,
OH Light
0. 25
35
Last used 1968
for 65, 000
Earth
3-1/2 mi Az 0° from
Rocky River Hbr,
OH Light
0. 25
35
Not used last
20 yrs
Rock
9 ml Az 0° from
Cleveland Hbr,
OH East Pierhead Light
2
35
Last used 1957
Earth and Rock
1-1/2 mi Az 48° from
Cleveland Hbr, OH E.
Pierhead Light
2
15
500,000
Earth
3-1/2 mi Az 11° 15'
from Falrport Hbr,
OH E. Breakwater Light
!
35
400. 000
Earth and Rock
„
2 nil Az 45° from
Ashtabula Hbr, OH E.
Breakwater Light
0. 25
35
220,000
Earth
'
2-1/4 mi Az 0® from
Ashtabula Hbr, OH E.
Breakwater Light
0.25
35
Used Infre-
quently when
bedrock is
excavated
from harbor
Rock
5 ml Az 315° from
Conneaut Hbr, OH W.
Breakwater Light
5
35
100,000
Earth and Rock
"
3 mi Az 315° 30' from
Erie Harbor, PA
lighted buoy #2
1
35
300,000
1 mi Az 0° from
Dunkirk Hbr, NY
Pierhead Light
0. 25
35
25,000
H-12
-------
Table H-4. Great Lakes Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Location
Size (sq mil
Depth ift;
Usage
(cu yds/'yr)
Dump Material
Using Agencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
BUFFALO DISTRICT (Continued)
Tj»kf? Erie (Cont'd)
1-2/3 mi Az 205° from
2
Varies from 0'
425,000
Earth and Rock
Buffalo District
Buffalo District COE
Par: water depth
Buffalo Hbr, NY S.
at shore to
COE
F req: as needed
Entrance Head Li|;hi
approx 30' in
deepest portion
By: Buffalo Dist COE
Lake Ontario
1-1/5 mi Az 0° from
0. 25
35
Used infre-
••
"
Wilson Hbr, NY
quently for
Pierhead Light
minor amts of
materia)
1-1/2 mi Az 0° from
0. 25
35
»
Olcott Hbr, NY Light
1-1/2 mi Az 60° from
0. 25
35
360,000
••
"
Rochester Hbr,
NY Light
1-3/4 mi Az 0° from
C. 25
35
Used infre-
-
Pultncyville Hbr
quently for
minor amts
of material
1-3/4 mi Az 30° from
0. 25
35
25,000
-
Great Sodus Day Hbr,
NY outer buoy
2-t/4 ml Az J 5° from
0. 35
35
B0t 000
"
Little Sodus Bay Hbr,
NY outer buoy
1-1/2 ml Az 33B° from
0. 25
35
B0,000
-
Oswego Hbr, W.
Pierhead Light
DETROIT DISTRICT
Site in Western End
1. 5
--
Not used since
Dredge Spoil
pvt Interests
COE
None
or Lake Erie
196B
Site in Lake St. Clair,
3
--
"
"
Michigan
CHICAGO DISTRICT
Lake Michigan
Vicinity of Green Day,
2
35.
1, 500,000
Sand, not
--
"
Wise., Green Bay-
(saturated)
polluted
receiving waters
(EPA standard)
Vicinity of Two Rivers,
2
50
35,000
--
Wise.
port Washington, Wise
1
93
10,000
--
Michigan City, Indiana
2
a
50,000
"
--
"
(temporarily abandoned)
H-13
-------
Table H-4. Great Lakes Dumping Sites Information (Continued)
Size Isq mi) I Depth (ft)
Usage
(eu yds/yr)
Dump Material
Usinn Auencies
Regulating Agencies
Surveillance or
Monitoring Program
Information
ST. PAUL DISTRICT
Lake Superior
Site at Duluth, Minn.
(21st Ave. Strip)
67, 000 tons a
day for 50
weeks a year.**
Taronite peel-
ings fj-om iron
mining
Reserve Mining
Co. , Silver Bay,
Minn.
Whom - State of
Minnesota Water
pollution Control
Agency, Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
Stations - 6
Frequency - every 2
weeks
Parameters -
Chemical - general
water chemistry,
including trace metals,
nutrients, IX). pll,etc.
(conducted year round!
Biological - periphyton
and diatom studies
(summer time oi\ly\
Data Flow - on stand-
ard forms, filed,
period of Record of
Study - app. 1 year
~Volume could be an error,
H-14
-------
APPENDIX I
WATER QUALITY MONITORING INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX I
WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITY FILE
The primary source of data on water quality monitoring activity in the
coastal zone used in this study was the U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS)
Office of Water Data Coordination (OWDC) computerized file on water data^)
Based on the cross reference list of OWDC map numbers and letters the EPA
Office of Water Programs, Technical Assistance Branch obtained and purged
the USGS data of all records except those relating to water quality monitoring
within the coastal zone.
The purged file was then further processed, edited, and summarized by
IEC as follows:
1) Superfluous data in each record was purged.
2) Records from wells, springs, and reservoirs were eliminated.
3) The remaining records were summarized by agency within county and
a preliminary report was run.
4) Data from the Phase B case study effort was encoded, checked and
merged with the file to create the monitoring summary file.
5) Final reports were prepared, summarizing (1) to state, county,
agency level, and (2) to EPA region and state levels.
1-1
-------
The various columns in Table 1-1 report are explained below:
1) State, County - data is summarized by agency to the county level
and then to the state and region. The stations reported in this
listing are not all stations in the county, but only those in the
geographical subunits (map nos./letters) contained in the cross
reference list for that county, as these represent more closely
the true "coastal zone".
2) The monitoring "quantity" factor is the sum of the number of para-
meter-samples (or measurements) taken per year. Continuous or
telemetered data was treated as one sample/hour. Intermittent
sampling was treated as one sample/year.
3) The monitoring quality factor is the ratio of the total number of
parameters monitored in the county to the total number of stations,
i.e. it represents the average number of parameters monitored per
station.
4) Number of stations - 1970, 1960, Change. The original USGS data
recorded "begin" and "end" dates for each monitoring station.
Counts were accumulated by agency for stations active in 1960 and
those active during or after 1970. The change refers to the net
difference in number of monitoring stations over the decade.
5) The number and type of parameters are broken out into general
parameters and certain specific parameters of interest. All
of these are for the period 1970 or later.
1-2
-------
REFERENCES:
(1) "Catalog of Information on Water Data", U.S. Dept. of Interior,
Geological Survey, Office of Water Data Coordination, 1970 edition.
1-3
-------
H
I
¦P-
TABLE 1-1. COASTAL MONITORING ACITIVITY SUMMARY
13 JUNE CRYSTAL f"»MTJR!\G ACTIVITY SU^aR* p*qE 1
AVERAGE Mj*BLR BF PARAMETERS MBNITBRED A/B 1970
RES18K
Quantity
PARAMS
••ACTIVE
ST*TieNS*«
••««PARAmFTEK
CROUPS
»•••»»••«¦• «««spec jr tc
PARAMETERS*****"****"*
STATE
PaRAm/YR
PER STA,
1370
I960
CHANCE
PHYS
CH^
BIB
SeD
TEMP
CUKD
PH
DB
BBD
TURB
CBLIF
1 CT
*2C95
6
65
6
171
213
35
3
31
1*
*2
18
6
3*
3*
1 ME
17520
1
2
h
-4
2
C
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
I MA
36100
8
3*
6
28
137
159
2
2
34
28
*0
8
1
2
1
1 NH
0
C
r
0
c-
C
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
1 «I
17798
1*
7
6
1
35
60
5
I
7
7
5
5
5
6
5
RE6I9N
1
TOTAL
113513
7
1C8
77
31
3*5
*32
*2
6
74
*9
87
31
12
*2
*0
2 NJ
9i6*9
1?
137
285
-148
727
855
161
10
138
33
1*2
127
131
120
133
2 NY
967*0
8
1*3
116
27
552
5<.2
164
0
127
57
98
10*
102
39
116
REQJ8N
2
TBTAt
188389
1C
280
*01
•121
1279
1397
345
10
265
90
2*C
231
233
159
2*9
3 OE
**623
10
6
*
2
2*
36
V
*
6
6
6
1
0
0
0
3 DC
7i*95
8
33
22
11
11C
152
3*
0
33
*
12
32
31
32
32
3 HD
35825
7
69
61
8
253
211
66
1
67
21
98
28
29
30
59
3 PA
137*17
13
37
12
25
199
255
22
20
37
3*
56
27
25
17
20
3 VA
12*8
8
3
11
•8
1?
9
3
0
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
REGIS*
3
T9T*t
290608
9
1*8
110
38
59*
663
125
25
1*6
65
175
91
88
82
11*
* AU
828
5
1*
1
13
*1
*C
C
0
1*
1*
13
0
0
0
0
* FL
312367
9
1C19
*5C
529
365C
*798
6C8
189
921
573
10*2
856
3*3
*21
375
« GA
1C7*52
1C
25
#
21
11*
13C
23
3
25
25
25
25
23
15
23
4 MS
11
11
1
17
-16
4
7
C
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
* NC
86202
13
22
86
-64
112
17*
1C
0
21
18
*0
18
5
8
10
* sc
868
ac
7
1
6
h9
86
7
0
9
8
15
8
6
8
7
REGION
4
TBTAt
5C7728
9
1C88
599
*89
397C
5235
6*8
189
991
638
1136
908
377
*53
*15
5 IL
*3379
8
1*0
7
133
4*9
*60
333
1
135
7*
139
27
1»
7*
132
5 JM
2759
15
26
3
23
191
IB*
3*
C
26
26
*2
26
20
22
2*
5 MJ
152558
9
188
67
121
7?C
9*3
1*3
9
159
1*2
1*6
108
*3
95
91
5 mk
1156*
1C
1C
6
*
35
53
16
5
7
3
6
5
5
5
8
5 NY
17*05
u
83
!
75
368
567
*1
0
75
70
78
70
70
69
25
5 9H
*16895
7
77
2C
57
187
316
86
25
39
*3
58
38
~
26
*6
5 PA
2911
15
2
5
-3
12
1*
*
0
2
0
3
1
1
2
2
5 MJ
38188
9
63
7
56
?*2
299
50
10
62
*6
65
*5
15
1*
31
-------
TABLE 1-1. COASTAL MONITORING ACTIVITY SUMMARY
13 JUNE
1972
CB
aSt'«l
MTf-RI\C
ACT I V ITN
' SUMPA-W
page ;
Avcfc*r,E:
t*r
PAKAfETt^S
HQNIT0RFO
A/9 197C
REGISN
C^aKtITv
params
• •ACTIVt.
STAT
••••rARA'TTFk
GROUFS »•»••
•••••••••••••SPECIFIC
PARAMETERS••••••••••••••
STATE
PA^^YR
PC STA.
197C
19&C
CHA\G£
p-
-------
APPENDIX J
LABORATORY AND FACILITIES INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX J
LABORATORY AND FACILITIES INVENTORY
T-l INTRODUCTION
The inventory is broken down into various federal and state agencies, and
universities by EPA regions and presented in tables J-l through J-13.
Within the regions, the entries are listed in an ascending GSA state and
county numerical order. The information that is presented in the tables
has been derived from numerous publications, case study investigations
and by telephone calls to areas where publications did not cover the
necessary information. The literature searched is presented as a biblio-
graphy at the end of this section, table J-0.
It was not possible to establish a format that could be optimally used
for the various types of information available; therefore, the format
used does not always serve the best purpose of the information presented,
but it does provide the best method of presentation for quick access of
data. The facilities information is structured for expandability as more
information becomes available, or as the information that is presented
changes.
J-l
-------
The presentation of the EPA facilities required a different format because
some of the information presented on the other agency lists was not
available.
The proper title or name for a facility was sometimes hard to determine
because within the laboratory system, one city might have several GPA offices
with laboratories; the relationship of these facilities, whether each
laboratory was separate or whether they were combined, was not always
clear. Therefore, such information was presented in the table without a
laboratory title, but with the organization relationship included to show
that there is the possibility of one or more facility or organization
within one city.
Where it was possible to break down the information and present only
coastal and estuarine programs, that was done and stated, but where it was
not possible, the budget reflects the higher level of funding. The problem
of listing personnel involved in coastal zone programs was also similar
to the budgetary breakdown for a particular entry. Where the available
information allowed the categorization of people involved in coastal work,
it was presented in that manner and only the coastal zone personnel were
entered into the statistical information. In some cases, however, no
separation could be made and is so noted.
J-2
-------
TABLE J-0
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON FACILITIES
(Used to Compile the Following Tables)
1. Committee on Public Works, United States Senate, National Environ-
mental Laboratories, A Compilation of Comments and Materials Related
to a Proposed Environmental Laboratory, January 1971.
2. Committee on Public Works, United States Senate, National Environmental
Laboratories Part 1, Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Air and Water
Pollution, Proceedings April 28 and 29, May 3, 4, 5 and 6, 1971.
3. Coastal Plains Center for Marine Development Services, Directory of
Facilities, March 1971.
4. Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic College,
San Luis Obispo, California, Directory of Marine Sciences Programs and
Facilities on the Pacific Coast. 1970 Edition.
5. Sea Grant Publications, Texas A&M University Sea Grant Program, December
1971.
6. Norman E. Whitehorn, Texas A&M University, Marine Resources Capabilities
in Texas, Directory of Facilities. May 1972.
7. Oceanology International, Annual Directory Issue. June 1971
8. W. Robert Patterson, The New England Marine Industry: A Study of the
Marine Manufacturing and Service Companies. January 1971.
J-3
-------
9. Peter H. Judd, An Inventory of Research Resources in the Southern New
England Coastal Zone: Connecticut and New York. February 20, 1971
10. The Oceanographer of the Navy, Oceanographic Ship Operating Schedules
Hay 1972.
11. Texas Water Development Board, Water For Texans, November 1971
12. Texas Water Development Board, Report 117, Chemical and Physical
Characteristics of Water In Estuaries of Texas, September 1967 -
September 1968, May 1970
13. J. H. HcGowne, C. G. Groat, L. F. Brown, Jr., W. L. Fisher, and A. J
Scott, Effects of Hurricane Celia -- A Focus on Environmental Geolofiir>
Problems of the Texas Coastal Zone, August 1970
14. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Organization
and Coastal Zone Programs, February 22, 1972
15. L. F. Brown, Jr., W. L. Fisher, A. W. Erxleben, and J. H. McGowen,
Resource Capability Unites, Their Utility in Land - and Water - Use
Management with Examples from The Texas Coastal Zone, (no date)
16. Policy Institute, Syracuse University Research Corporation, Environ-
mental Research Laboratories in the Federal Government, Vol. 1.
September 1971
17. Policy Institute, Syracuse University Research Corporation, Environ-
mental Research Laboratories in the Federal Government, Volume II.
September 1971
18. Under Sea Technology, Handbook Directory. 1971/72
19. Data Publications, Hydrospace Buyers' Guide. 1969 Edition
-------
20. New England Marine Resources Information Program, Directory of Academic
Marine Sciences Programs in New England, December 1969
21. The Research Institute of the Gulf of Maine (TRIGOM), Directory of
Marine Research Facilities and Personnel in Maine, May 1971
22. Richard C. Vetter, Oceanography Information Sources/70, 1970
23. American Council of Independent Laboratories, Inc., Directory, 1972
24. New England River Basins Commission, Annual Report Fiscal Year 1971,
June 30, 1971
25. New England River Basins Commission, Plan of Study, Long Island Sound
Regional Study, August 1, 1971
26. New England River Basins Commission, Directory Long Island Sound
Regional Study, January 1972
27. University of Maine School of Law, Maine Law Affecting Marine Resources,
Volume I, 1969
28. New England Marine Resources Information Program, Northeastern U.S.
Directory of Marine Extension Workers. April 1971
29. Gulf Universities Research Corporation, Recommended Pilot Program For
the Gulf Environmental Program: An Interdisciplinary Study of the
Gulf of Mexico, January, 1971
30. New England Marine Resources Information Program, Northeastern U.S.
Directory of Marine Extension Workers. July 1971
31. Interagency Committee on Oceanography, Aquatic Sciences in the Great
Lakes Area, (no date)
32. Great Lakes Basin Commission, Great Lakes Institutions: A Survey of
J-5
-------
Institutions Concerned with the Water and Related Resources in the
Great Lakes Basin, June 1969
33. The Oceanographer of the Navy, University Curricula in the Marine
Sciences and Related Fields, August 1971
34. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Directory of State.
Territorial, and Regional Health Authorities, 1968
35. The Florida Council of 100, Oceanography in Florida 1970. January 1970
36. Environmental Science & Technology, 1971-72 Pollution Control Directory.
September 1971
J-6
-------
Notes that apply to the tabular material (Table J-l to J-13):
AGENCY LABORATORY - Parent Agency followed by the laboratory or facility
name and city/state location.
ST - 1970 GSA state code.
CO - 1970 GSA county code.
MAJOR FUNCTION - Agency responsibilities within the coastal zone.
PHYSICAL SIZE SQ. FT. - Square footage of the facility. Broken into sub-
functions where information was available.
PERSONNEL - Breakdown of personnel into 8 groups. Professionals not in the
seven specific groups would be in the other column along with
support personnel.
ANNUAL BUDGET - Fiscal periods for noted budgets where information was
available.
J-7
-------
TABLE J-l.
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
c-1
i
oo
AGENCY
LABORATORY
EEGIOil 1
Lhiuarsity of Bridgeport
Bridgeport, CT
Center for tiie
Environment and Man
liartford, CI
Uni\ersity of
Connecticut
IJarine Research
Laboratory
Itoank, CT
Uni^rsity of
Connecticut
Starrs, CT
Uii\«rsity of
Gcnnecticut
Ilarine Sciences
Institute
Avery Point, CT
Soutiiem iiaine
Vocational Teclinical
Institute
South Portland, MJ
IVJOR
sc a) HJiicria;
Educational/
09 001 ffcseardi
Independent
Ucnprofit
09 003 FGsearch
Educational/
09 011 Research
Educational/
09 013 Jtesearcn
Educational/
09 999 ffesearch
Educational/
23 005 research
PHYSICAL
SISE
SQ. FT.
0CEA11
Binuo ograp aim
gis'is hers isis
HIFSCI'CIEL
BfCrn
PHYSI PIOLO EIGEI TECISJ
CIS'iS GISTS EFRS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
ANITUAL
BUDdn'
Professional Staff of 74
41 115
Faculty of 9
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AQLiJCY
LfBORlWOFY
I ii\JOP.
st oo ru.'cria;
n;psaiEL
PHYSICAL OCLA'i BZ-CTE
sizl: biolo ograp aa:; piiyei pjqlo eigei itani atjnual
so. FT. GlS'ir, IUTS ISTS CISTS CIS'IS HPS ICAL OIHEP. TOTAL BUDGE!'
REGION 1
University of Ilaine
Ira C. Darling
Center
Orono, IE
Educational/
23 019 research
Woods llole
Qcearvograptiic Institution
ttaods Hole, ;iTl
Lxlucational/
25 001 Ifescarch
Soutineastem
Massachusetts
Uiiversity
itortii Dartmouth, ilA
Educational/
2-> 005 ftesearch
University of
Massachusetts
iVnherst, MA
Educational/
25 015 Research
llassacuusetts
Institute of Technology
Canbridge, IiA
Educational/
25 019 Research
Uni\rersity of
ifew Hanpstiixe
Durnam, 121
Educational/
33 017 Ifc search
University of
Iixxle Island
Kingston, HI
Educational/
44 009 Itesearch
C-H
i
vD
-------
Ch
I
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AGUJCY
LABORATORY
iiwon
sr <30 I'U.'cria:
rersaiEL
niYSICAL OCEftl BAdE
SIZE BICLO OGRAT CHEH IttYSI KIQLO HJGH1 lEaUJ KMJflL
SQ. FT. GISTS HEIS 3STS CISTS GISTS EEFS ICfiL OTIER TOTAL BUDCET
REGIOU 2
Stevens Institute
of Teciinology
Davidson Laixsratory
llcboken, 14 J
liiucational/
34 017 It; search
Ritgers - Tiie State
University
Oyster Research Labs
iiew Brunswick, IJJ
Educational/
34 023 Ffcsearch
Ifew York iVjuarium
Osborn Laboratories
of Marine Sciences
New York, IJY
3C 047 Hesearch 10,000 tot.
Scientific Staff of 15
30
45
(71)
300K
Long Island University
C.W. Post College
Greenville, IJY
Educational/
3G 039 Ffcsearch
Oolurbia University
Lament Geological
Cbservatory
Iiew York, WY
Educational/
3G 061 ifeseandi
iJew York Univarsity
Bronx, IJY
Educational/
30 0C1 Ite search
Itolybeclmic Institute
of Brooklyn
Brooklyn, iJY
Educational/
3ti 0G1 Jfesearch
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AOHCY
LABORATORY
imjOR
st co Fuiicriai
h:psqiel
hiysical acm; bt£tt
si in bicxo ograp ain: hiysi eiqlo is;gh: tecum mjual
sq. ft. gisis m;re ists cis'rs gists ncrs ical other tclm, buexxt
R E G I O iJ 2
State University of
I tew York
MaritiiiE College
Etart Schuyler, iiY
Litucat tonal/
36 061 research
itaw York City Co? lorje
Marine Hicrobiology
Ecoloqy Lab.
Itew York, 1IY
Iilucational/
36 061 Beseandi
IJew York Ocean
Science Laboratory
Ifcrttaiik, LiY
Educational/ 300,000 tot.
36 103 ffcsearch 30,000 lab.
Senior Staff of 10
(71)
1,200K
State University
of Ifew York
Itarine Sciences
Rgaaarch Center
Stcneyorook, IJY
3G 103 Iteseaieh
Doctorate level staff of 10
Long T si and university
Sautlihaq^on College
Sbuthhanpton, IJY
Mel phi Uhi\rersity
Marine Stat,ten
Oataiale, HY
Cducaticnal/
36 103 Research
Educational/
3G 103 Iteaearch
Uiiversity of
Puerto Rico
Mayaquez, PR
imal/
72 650 Research
-------
REGION 3
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
f
t*
mmia
LABORATORY
I1AJ0P.
st oo rujcriai
rcnsaiEL
PHYSICAL OCEAiJ BACTT
SIZE BIOLC OGRJT CHIT I HIYSI PJOLO E-IGIU lECMJ ANNUAL
sc.1. FX'. GIS1S Iff IRS IS'JS cisis gists eers ical other total budget
Unirersity of
Delaware
itawark, 1£
Educational/
10 003 Itesearch
'file catholic
University of America
Institute of
Ocean Engineering
Washington, DC
Hie George V&sxiingtcn
Uni\rersity
Wasiiingbon, DC
University of
Maryland
Chesapeake Biological
Laboratory
College Park, I1D
The Jam Hopkins
Uhirersity
Baltimore, ID
Educational/
11 001 Iteseardi
Educational/
11 001 Itesearch
Educational/
24 033 Research
Educational/
24 510 Research
i&rine Science
Consortium of
Pennsylvania
Colleges and Uniwrsities Educational/
llillersville, PA 42 071 Research
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
.AGCiCY
LTiBOPi"J"ORY
;i\ron
st co rawcriaj
PHYSICAL
SIZE
SO. FT.
ocx?:i
bictlo onp/p aar:
GISTS HE IB ISTS
FEUSCtJIEL
B/jCX
HIYSI RIQLC 13 r,IIl TECUM
CISTS GISTS HEPS ICAL OTHER TOT7X,
AMiTJAL
BUDC22T
K E G I 0 U 3
Idiigh University
Gaiter for llarine
and Environmental
Studies
Betiileiieaa, PA
lilucatiorial/
42 077 Itesearai
Virginia Institute
of ilarine Science
Gloucester Point, Vh
Educational/
51 073 Ite search
Old Loan non
University
Institute of
Oceanography
iiorfok, VA
Educational/
51 710 It; search
Old Dominion
University
Ooaanogr^hic
Research Field
Station
Iattle Creek, VA
Educaticrial/
51 810 Research
C-i
i
u>
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AOIJCY
LABOPArORi'
; iAJOR
st co i-ujcria;
IERSCUJEL
PHYSICAL (XTJil B/XZTE
SI"I' BICLO OGRAP QE1 HIYSI RIGLO niGri Tnaci ANNUAL
SQ. IT. GIS1S UTRS ISl'S CISTS GISVS LLPS ICAL other total budget
REGION 4
Uiiwrsity of
Alabana
Tuscaloosa, AL
Educational/
01 125 research
Florida Institute
of Teciinology
lialbounie, EL
Lducaticnal/
12 009 Itesearch
itova Lhiversity
Physical Oceanograpiiic
Laboratory
Dania, EL
12 Oil research
1,200 off.
0,000 lab.
Uiiversity of Miami
Itosenstiel Sciool
of Marine and
Atraospiieric Science
Miami, FL
12 025 research
33,400 off.
37,300 lab.
500 1024K
Uni^rsity of (test
Florida
Dejit. of Biology Lab. 1,200 off.
Pansacola, FL 12 033 Itsearcii o,000 lab. Scientific Staff of 5 13 9
Lbii\*;rsity of
South Florida
Marine Sciences
Institute Educational/
Tant», FL 12 057 research Facility of 20
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AOIiCY
LABORSlTOFQT
I12JOR
st od rtucria;
FtKsa n nx.
niYSICAL 0CT7II BPCTE
SIZT BIGLO OGRAP affi HIYSI RIOLO EJGB1 TEGU flNilUfiL
so. nr. gists urns isas cists gists lers ical ckher total budget
RLGIOIJ 4
Florida State
Uiivarsity
Biology' Department
Tallahassee, FL
12 073 Heseardi
COO off.
4,000 lab.
Scientific Staff of 17
18 20K
Florida Atlantic
Uiiwsrsity
Boca Raton, EL
Educational/
12 099 Iteseardl
Georgia Soutiiem
Cbllege
lXiiit. of Geology
Statesboro, GA
Geological
Oceanographic
Educational/
13 031 Itesearch
Staff itercLers are research associates
witii Skidaway Inst, of Oceanography
University of Gaorgia
Skidaway Institute
of Qceanograptiy
Savannah, GA
Applied
13 51 research 17,000 tot.
12
iincry Uniwrsity
Atlanta, GA
tducaticnal/
13 121 Fteseardi
Facility of 14
Georgia Institute
of Technology
Atlanta, GA
University of Georgia
Marine Institute
Sapelo Island, GA
Educational/
13 121 Research
13 191 Iteseardti
(Scientific Staff enly)
4 13 14 45
10
Partial
(70)
4r757K
i
i—'
-------
Ch
I
ON
AOiJCT
LiiBQRKTOItf
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
major
sr cd FUiicricu
PERSaiEL
HtYsiCAL oovjj nAcrc
SIZE BICiLO OGHAT QD1 FHYSI RIGLO E-JGIN TEQEJ ANMUAL
so. FT. GISTS 1IETS ISTS CISTS GISTS KEFS ICAL OTHER TOTAL Rtttytpt
REGIOIJ 4
University of
Southern I lississippi
Hattiesijurg, US
Qulf Ooast
Research Laboratory
Ocean firings, IE
Educational/
28 035 Research 35,000 tot.
Educational/
23 059 Research
itorth Carolina State
Uiiwrsity
Pamlico Marine Lab.
Aurora, IJC
Ulucatictial/
37 013 Research
Euke University
Marine Laboratory
Beaufort, :iC
East Carolina University
Marine Science center
:ianteo, iJC
Educational/
37 031 Research
Educational/
37 055 research
14 2
Cape Fear Itecijnical
Institute
Wilmington, iJC
Educational/
37 129 Research
Wrigiitsville Marine
Bio-medical Lab. Iilucaticnal/
Wilmington, WC 37 129 Research 6,000 lab. 3 3
-------
TABLE J-l.
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AGEJCY
laborkto rar
i^uon
ST CD HJIJCTiai
PEPSnCCL
PHYSICAL OCE/:; BACTE
si an Binu> ocrv\p am* pkysi piolo n:cri hjcki /:ciual
so. ft. gists inxs is:s cis?s nis'-s n:rs ical an eh toot, budcxt
RIGIO.i 4
University of
.jortii Carolina
Cliapel Hill,
liiucational/
37 135 itsearch
7 3 2
1 1 12
IteLtical Uiiversity
of South Carolina
Charleston, SC
Uiucaticnal/
45 Ol'J Research
(::unbers not s^jecifiod)
X
The Citciel
diaries toil, SC
Coastal &
Ustuarirue
45 019 Itesearch
12
28
Clerason University
Water ltesources
Rasearea Institute
demscn, SC
\ titer
45 077 Itesouroes
A A
XXX
University of South
Carolina
Belle W. Barucii Inst,
for Coastal & Littoral
Sciences
Colurrtaa, SC
liarine
45 079 Itseardi
10
5 20
i
-------
u
I
00
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
LABOliATOKY
iSVJOR
st co EUJcria;
PHYSICAL
SIZE
SQ. IT.
ocrwi
biolo ograp ainr
gists in rs isis
EcrsaiEL
were
nrysi riold n.-Gri Tcanj
cists gist's enrs ical otiep total
KilUAL
BUDGET
ELGIOjl 5
University of Illinois
Urbana, IL
Uiiversity of
Cliicago
tiiicago, IL
University of iliciiigan
Ann Arbor, MI
Uni\rersity of
Wisconsin
liodiscn, W1
Iiiucational/
17 019 Ifcsearcii
Iiiucational/
17 031 Ifcsearch
iiiucational/
26 1G1 Research
Iiiucational/
55 025 ITesearch
-------
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AOlvCY
LABORKTOKf
11/JOR
srr oo Rjircria;
HIYSICAL
size
SO. FT.
cxxkj
BIQLO OGRAP QOl
GISTS HERS IS"S
rtjISClClEL
BfiCTL
I7IYSI PIQLO EIJGEi TECHIi
CISTS GISTS 1X15 ICAL
OTHER TOTAL
K-MUAL
BUDGET
REGION C
Louisiana State
Uiiversity
ilariiie Sciences
Dept.
Baton Rouge, LA
nidiolls State College
Thiixxkux, IA
Educational/
22 033 Ite search
Educational/
22 057 Itesearcii
Ttexas A & I I
University
College Station, TA
Texas A & 11
Uiiversity
Marine Laboratory
Galveston, Bi
University of Ttocas
Marine Science
institute
Rart Araisas, TX
Educational/
48 041 Ifeseartdi
Educational/
48 167 Research
Iiiucatiflnal/
48 355 It search
C-l
i
vO
-------
C-4
I
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
aqiicy
laboratory
;vjor
sr co luicriaj
FERSdHJEL
niYsicAL oavw bach;
Sine BIQLO OGRAP CHEM P5IYSI RIOLO EUGEJ TECH J AiJWUAL
SO. FT. GIST'S IIIIRS ISIS CISTS GISTS ELFS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGIOil 9
Hunuoldt State College
Marine Sciences Lab.
Trinidad, CA
Lducational/
06 023 rfc search
University of
Southern California
Marine Biological
Laboratory
Fisiierraans Cavs
Catalina Island, CA
educational/
06 037 Itesearch
Uniwrsity of
Southern California
Allan Hancock
Foundation
Los Angeles, CA
iiiucatianal/
06 037 Rsseardi
Cal. State Long Beach
Marine Laboratory
Lcng Beach, CA
Lducational/
06 037 Research
Staff of 44
Ooeanograpliic
Institute of Technology
Lcng Be act l, CA.
Educational/
06 037 Ffe search
University of the Pacific
Pacific Ilarine
Station
Dillon Beach, CA
educational/
06 041 Ffe search 11,000 tot.
-------
TABLE J-l.
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
AOiJCY
LAbORATOKY
I yjOR
ST CD EUIJCTiai
iuysical
sisu
so. nr.
prrsaiii,
ocl7;i pjctt.
BinLO ogp.af an;: niysi rioi/; iijgei tlghj annual
GISTS I3:PS ISTS CIST'S GIS1S ET.RS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDCET
R t G I O II 9
College of ilarin
Dolenas Ilarxne
Stat, inn
Bolinas, G\
Jilucaticnal/
06 041 Ffesearch
Pacific Uiioii College
tfcndocino Biological
Field Station
Albion, CA
Ijiucational/
Oti 045 Ifcscarch
Professional Staff of 3
Calif. State Colleges
Moss Landing Labs.
Ibes Landing, CA
Educational/
06 053 Research 14,000 tot.
Stanford University
Hopkins Marine
Station
Pacific Gro-ve, CA
Educational/
06 053 Itesearch
Resident Staff of 7
Calif. Institute
of Teciinology
Iterckhoff Marine
Laboratory
Cacona Del Mar, CA
Educational/
06 059 Ha search 3,000 tot.
San Diego State
Marine Sciences
Program
San Diego, CA
Educational/
06 073 Jtesearch
Faculty Staff of 25
i
to
-------
Lh
I
ro
ro
PQUCt
iyUiORAHOltf
TABLES J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
iraou
ST CD lUJCi'ia;
FERSaiJEL
PHYSICAL OCE/il BME
sizi: Difxo ogt!AP aini hivsi moid eugej rami amiual
SO- FT. GISTS JITIS ISIS CIS'iS GISTS IXIS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDCET
REGIOU 9
Uiiversity of Calif.
Scripys Institution
of Oceanograyhy
La Jolla, Cft
Lducaticnal/
06 073 research
Faculty of over 100
San Francisco
State College
Dejjt. of I Marine
Biology
San Francisco, CA
Educational/
Ob 075 ffe search
Cal. State Polytechnic
College
Dept. of Biolgoical
Sciences
San Luis Cbispo, CA
University of Calif.
Bodega Marine
laboratory
Bodega Bay, CA
Uhiuarsity of Calif.
Santa Barbara
iiarine Laboratory
Santa 3arbara, G\
Lducaticnal/
0C 079 research
Lducaticnal/
0C 097 l-e search
Educational/
0(j 083 Ifcsearcii
Facility of 40
Uiiversity of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii
Iiiucerticnal/
15 003 lesoarcli
-------
TABLE J-l, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
£-<
I
ro
LO
AGEJOf
LABOKffiORf
IfflJOR
ST CO FUNCTION
FERSCNiEL
PHYSICAL OCEMI B^CTE
SIZE BICILD OGRftP CHEfl HTCSI RIQLO E3JGHJ TECHH m*JKL
SQ. FT. GISTS IERE ISTS CISTS GISTS EEES ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGION 10
Uii\rersity of Alaska
Institute of Marine
Science
College, AK
Educational/
02 000 Haseardi 20,000 tot.
Staff of 24
80 104
University of Washington
Friday Harbor
Laboratories
San Juan Is., WA
Educational/
53 055 Ifesearch
Wastem Washington
State College
lAStni Is. Lab.
Bellin^iati, WA
Ediicational/
53 073 Ra search
Vfella Walla College
Marine Biological Sta.
Anaoortes, WA
educational/
53 057 Hasearch
Seattle Pacific College
Canp Caaey Biological
Laboratories
Ctoupeville, Wk
Educational/
53 029 itesearch
university of Washington
OaLlege of Fisheries
Seattle, WA
Educational/
53 033 Besearch
Uhiwrsity of Washington
Dept. of Oceanography
Seattle, VIA
Educatimal/
53 033 Jtegearch
-------
C-.
I
NJ
TABLE J-l. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
jyatucy
Iw'iBORffiORX
I1AJOR
sr oj Euicriaj
fCPsaniCL
HTYSICTL OCEKJ BflCT
SIZU BIOLO OGRAP ami PHYSI KEQLO CJGIIJ 'XECIIU A1JIJUAL
SO. FT. GISTS I EPS ISTS CISTS GISTS 1XPS ICfiL OTHER TOTAL BUDCTX1
RLGIOII 10
Uhivarsity of Oregon
Qregcn Institute of
Ilarine Biology
Qiarlestoii, OR
Educational/
41 Oil Itsearch
Oregon State liiiversity
Marine Science Center
iicwport, OR
Uducaticnal/
41 041 Ifesearch 33,000 tot.
Oregon State Uni\rersity
Dept. of Oceanography
Corvallis, OR
Kflimfrt-imaV
41 003 Itesearch
-------
TABLE J-2. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
AQJIiCY
LAuoivffORY
;iwon
st
-------
<-»
I
N3
TABLE J-2. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
flGEllCY
LABORATORY
R E G I 0 U 9
tiiYTOR
st od EUn criai
PCPSCtlEL
physical occni bact:
SIZL BIGLO OGPAP aiEi HMSI RIGLO E.IGHI TDQEJ MtlUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HCIS ISTS CISTS GISTS XUKS ICftL OH ILK TOTAL BUDCET
AUC
Lawrence Radiation
Laboratory-Berkeley
Berkeley, Calif.
mt
Lawrence Radiation
Labor atory-Li\crxnore
Livermcre, Calif.
REGIOU 1£
WC
Pacific :Jortiwest
Laboratory
Richland, Uasn.
iiinor %
Iiwironrnental
06 001 Deseardi 1,1Q0K tot.
Minor %
liivircmnental
Radiaticn
06 001 Research 2.750K tot.
35-40%
Environmental
53 005 Itesearch 1,050K +
(71)
143 219 177 1905 2448 35,535K
(72)
213 449 607 4196 5470 124,300K
all
(Qnvironraental Sciences Div. cnly) div
31% 18% 51% 1500 34.000K
-------
TABLE J-3. FEDERAL FACILITIES
BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE
AGUJCY
IABOK&XIHY
irjoi;
si' oo ruucricu
PHYSICAL
sine
3Q. FT.
ocean
BIOjO OGRAP CHOI
GISTS HLPS ISIS
rcrsacEL
B/iCTE
FHYSI RIOLO IllGEJ TECHIj
CISTS GISTS EEES ICfiL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUDGET
R U G I 0 U 2
Bureau of Sport
Fisi cries and Wildlife
Eastern Fish
Nutrition Lab.
Cortland, iJ.Y.
rish
liutriticn
3G 023 Itesearch
10,000 tot.
Professional Staff of 6
(71)
12 100K
REGION 3
Bureau of Sport
Fisheries and Wildlife
Patuxent Wildlife
feseardi Genter
Laurel, IE.
tiLLdlife
24 003 Research
Professional Staff of 64
36 100
(71)
1,845K
R E G I O 1J 4
Bureau of Sport
Fisheries and Wildlife
Fish Ftesticide
Iteseartii Lab.
Cbluzbia, IB.
Aquatic
Itesticide
28 091 Rsseardi
23,000 tot. 16
23 48
(72)
760K
REGION 5
Bureau of S£ort
Fisheries aid Wildlife
Great Lakes
Fisiiery Lab.
Am Arbor, 1H.
Groat
lakes
Fisheries
2C 1C1 Hesaarcli
43,000 tot.
25
42
71
(72)
1800K
C-l
i
ro
-j
-------
u
t
N>
00
LABOPATOI3? LOCATION
RE G I ON 1
Winchester, I1A
Ifeedham, I2\
Uarragansett, RI
West Kingston, RI
REG I on 2
Edison, UJ
Rociiester, IIY
ltew York, 1JY
RE GI01I 3_
Washington, DC
Annapolis, ID
Baltsville, ID
Rackville, l-D
Charlotesville, VA
Vlieeling, WVA
TABLE J -4. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HIYSICAL Sin: TOTAL
st oo so. rr. ormiis/triamL rxaticmship personnel
25 017 11,250 tot. 0CP 19
25 021 12,500 tot. Ifegicn I 16
44 009 20,100 tot. OH! 82
44 009 QUI
34 0 23 127,COO tot. OR1, Itegion II 54
36 055 10,150 tot. Ifegicn II 6
36 061 OCP 10
11 001 4,000 tot. OCP 14
24 003 5,200 tot. Begicn III 11
24 003 OCP 58
24 031 52,268 tot. OH' 60
31 540 7,700 tot. Ifegicn III 7
54 069 5,300 tot. Ifegicn III 11
-------
TABLE J-4. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LABORffiOrY DXAXIOLI ST CO
REGIOil £
Dauphin Island, AL 01 097
Ibntgonery, AL 01 101
Iterrine, EL. 12 025
Gulf Breeze, EL 12 113
Athens, GA 13 059
Chanblee, Gft 13 089
Bay St. Louis, IE 28 045
Research Triangle Park, ilC 37 051
Wadmalaw Is., SC 45 019
REGION 5
Chicago, IL 17 043
Evansville, EJ 18 163
Am Arbor, I II 26 161
GroGse lie. III 26 163
Minneapolis, IN 27 053
Ely, IN 27 137
PHYSICAL SIZE
SQ. FT.
12,000 tot.
45,000 tot.
ORGHJIZATIONAL lELfiTICHSHIP
56,150 tot.
300,000 tot.
20,000 tot.
22,900 tot.
7,100 tot.
OH!
or i, orp
OKI
or;, ocp
OHi-Itegiai IV
OI51, OPP
OCP, Jfegion IV
OR1, QAI'JP, OKI, CEGC
4,300 tot.
3,100 tot.
Jtegian V
Ftegion V
CW1P
OR! Ifegicn V
Region V
TOTAL
PERSCIJNEL
22
70
55
39
119
87
49
946
23
23
12
157
16
3
5
C-H
I
N>
vO
-------
LABORATORY LOCAflOt
REGIOil 5
Uuluth, It]
Cleveland, (31
Cincinnati, <31
Lebanon, CXI
RE GI Oil G
Baton Itougc, LA
Ma, ck
Dallas, TX
RLGIOJ 9.
Alameda, CA
San Francisco, Ch
Las Vegas, 1JE
TABLE J-4. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
physical sizk total
00 SO. FT. OHGATIIZiCICtlAL IEIATICUSIIP rEPSdffEL
137 44,000 tot. OFI1 91
035 9,G00 tot. Ifegicn V 9
0G1 OH5, OSIM, OWP, CEGC 751
1G5 5,000 tot. 11
033 10,250 tot. Itegion VI 6
123 50,300 tot. OKi, Region VI 74
113 rtegian VI 25
001 11,500 tot. Ifegian E; 21
075 OCP 8
003 103,750 tot. OKI, OCT, OK: 208
-------
TABLE J-4. FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PHYSICAL SIZL TOTAL
LABORATORY LOCAl'ICt,' ST 00 SQ. ET. OimJIZrtriCtlflL fULTTIClJSHIP PErSaCJlX
EEGIOU 10
Collegs, AK
02
000
20,000 tot.
oh:
16
Corvallis, OR
41
003
49,500 tot.
OH , OPP
34
Seattle, W7\.
53
033
3,400 tot.
Region Hi
11
Gig Harbor, VIA
53
053
3,700 tot.
om
10
i
u»
-------
I
IsJ
TABLE J-5. FEDERAL FACILITIES
MIS CELLANIOUS laboratories
ivaijcy
u^sxxnaois
: tsjof.
sv cd ruicriaj
rcnsacEL
PHYSICAL OCE7U B^CEC
size Bifxo ogiyjt am: hiysi hioio ejgii; -mam mhjual
sq. rr. gists m:rs isrs czsrs gists elts ical other total budcttc
Rt G I Oil 8
IJSF
Jatiaial Center for
itoospheric Itsoarcii
Boulder, CD
U.S. Bureau of Ifeclai nation
Digineering aiul
He search Qenter
Denver, CD
fttixejiieric
08 013 research 130,000 tot.
Support of
lister
It; sources
03 031 I anaqomciit
23
33
245,000 tot.
28
2C4
511 600 24,263K
(72)
372 646 9500K
EtGlOil 10
Public Health Service
Artie ilealtii
Ifcsearch Center
College, AK
Artie
Health
02 000 Research
Professional Staff of 28
(69)
55 83 1066.5K
-------
TABLE J-5. FEDERAL FACILITIES
MISCELLANIOUS LABORATORIES
y
UBCRXZOTK
i jvion
st cr> ruijcriai
prrsa^EL
hiysical ocr?:; btcie
SIZU BIQLO OGF/J1 OET. HIYSI FJCSLO IZIGI1J TDC3IN MttJUM,
SQ. FT. GISTS I UTS IETJS CISTS GIS1S HIS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
R K G I O 1J 1
U.S. Coast Guard
Zcadeny
;jew London, CT
i&litary
09 Oil Lducational
R L G I O IJ 3
U.S. Coast Guard
Cceanograpiiic Uiit
lifeisiiington, DC
Oceanograpiiic
11 001 research
Professional Staff of 22
48
70
(69)
750
National Bureau
of Standards
Gaitiiersburg, ID
I basurnncnt
Techniques
24 031 research 158CK tot.
270
49C
318
2079 3163
(72)
87,278K
REGIOl! 4
U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture
Soil Conservation
Service
Colurijia, SC
Ifesouroe
45 079 I ianaqement
C-c
i
OJ
u»
-------
TABLE J-6. FEDERAL FACILITIES
V NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
W
X12JCY
LABORATORY
MAJOR
ST 00 FUliCTiai
PHYSICAL
SI2E
SO. FT.
OCHil
Biao ograp CHni
GISTS HERS ISTS
repsaciLL
BACTE
BIYSI RIQLO EJGIU TECHN
CISTS GISTS EERS ICTsL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUXIH?
REGION 2
I1ASA
Goddard Space
Fligiit Canter
Greenbelt, ID
Itemote
Sensor
24 033 Iteseardi
(Earth Itesources Program only)
415
(71)
40,OOOK
REGION 4
liASA
Mississippi Test
Facility
Bay St. Louis, MS
28 045
Environmental 157,320 shop
Research 78,749 lab.
Support 133,490 off.
21
157 133
(71)
29,500K
-------
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
A3JJCY
LfiBonflroRf
riAJOR
sr cd Funcriai
FERSaHJEL
RIYSICAL OCCWJ BACTE
size qiqtjO ocrap am: hiysi piolo lz;ghi tcchn /\nnuai
SQ. FT. GISTS HUES ISTS CISTS GISTS EEFS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
R L G I 0 U 10
ICARUS
Auke Bay
Biological Lab.
Juneau, PK
Fisheries
02 000 Jfeseartii
Professional staff of 27
(69)
39 66 1,600K
IJCftMlHES
Hanncrxi Biological
Field Stvrt-.im
Hairicnd, OR
Fislierii2S
41 007 Itesearch 1,000 tot.
100K
I*»A
Pacific Oooanographic
Laboratories
Seattle, WA
Ooeanograpliic
53 033 Fteseardi
15
25
(71)
674K
UQAfl/UTFS
Marine Matmal
Rasearch Lab.
Seattle, Vffv
Marine
llaranal
53 033 Ifesearai
Professional Staff of 9
11
(69)
333K
MOAViOSS
Seattle Biological
Laboratory
Seattle, HA
Fisheries
53 033 Rpsearrii
Professicnal Staff of 83
144
(69)
4,043K
OC3M/LKS
Pacific Marine Center
Seattle, HA
ooeanograptiic
53 033 Survey
360
C.4
I
u>
w
-------
C-4
I
w
a*
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
LftBQRATOBY
RC G I OiJ 9
il/UOR
ST CD tUJCTICSJ
PEKSai-EL
PHYSICAL OCEAN BACTE
SI EE BIQLO OGRAP aid I HIYSI RIOLO E1GEJ TECItt.7 AiEJUAL
SQ. FT. GIS'JS IIEFS ISIS CISTS GISIS EEIS ICAL OHIER TOTAL BUDGET
UQfiA
Tiburon tiarine
Minerals Hecimology
Oanter
Tiburcn, CA
IJGAA/UI1FS
Tiburcn Iterine
Laboratory
TiUuxai, CA
IJOftA/iilFS
Fisiieries Oceanograjiiy
Center
La Jolla, CA
UOttA/.ttSFS
Ocean HssearcU
Laboratory
Palo Alto, CA
iJOAA/Uff'S
Honolulu Biological
Laboratory
Honolulu, HI
tiarine
I lining
06 041 Fesearch
Fislkeries
06 041 Iteseardi
Fisheries
06 073 Ifeseardi
Oceanic &
Fisiieries
06 081 Research
Fisiieries
15 003 Ifesearch
30,858 other
24,G25 lab.
77,000 tot.
24
Professional Staff of 20
Professional Staff of 7
Professional Staff of 4
Professional Staff of 23
(71)
41 61 850K
13
50 80
60 83
(71)
245K
(71)
1,975K
(69)
118.6K
(69)
1,421K
-------
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
NATIONAL OCEANOGRAFHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
LTJjQKtrORy
;ifijor.
st cd tuHcriai
H:rsaiin,
FHVSICAL OZui: &OX
sxzu biolc OHM1 an": piiysi pjolo eigej teqci aiiiual
SQ. FT. GISCS 1EPS ISTS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTHER TOT7\L BUDGET
KEGIOII 5
iJORA/.JOS
iiatianal Lake Survey
ite search Center
Detroit, in
Great Lal.es
26 163 Ifcseardi
Professional Staff of 30
35 115
RLGIOil 6
iJQAAAilFS
Galveston Biological
Laboratory
Galveston,
Fisheries
43 167 Research
Professional Staff of 31
(69)
20 51 1,421K
REGION 8
iJCftA
Uaue Propagation
laboratory
Boulder, CO
Oceanograpliic
08 013 Itesearcli 133K tot.
32
(71)
66 107 2,443K
MCftA
Earth Sciences Lab.
BcxOiier, CO
Earth
Sciences
03 013 rteseardi
133K tot.
Professional Staff of 19
(71)
22 41 1,174K
i
CJ
-j
-------
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
'T NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
u*
00
LABOPjCOI
-------
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
NATIONAL OCEANOGRAFHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
AQ1JCY
LABORATORY
: IAJOR
st oo Euicriai
mpsacjEL
HIYSICAL OCEAt! BACTE
SIZE BICSLO OGRAP aini niYSI raaLO HJGIH TEQC-I AtETUAL
SQ. IT. GISTS HETS ISIS CISTS GISTS EE PS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
HEGIOii 2
IJQftA
Gaopliysical Fluid
Dynamics Lab.
Princeton, *JJ
tJQAVtHIFS
Sandy liook
Ilarine Laboratory
Highlands, ilJ
Geophysical
34 021 Ffcsearch
Fisheries
34 025 Research 30,000 tot.
Scientific Staff of 10
60 64
(71)
2,257K
51 85 1,400K
REGION 3
HOftR/lIESS
Satellite Experiment
Laboratory
Suitland, ID
Earth
Satellite
24 033 Itesearch
Professional Staff of 20
(69)
48 63 2,130K
iiQAA
iiigineering Deployment
Laboratory
Rxkville, ID
Oaeanograpiiic
Instrument
24 031 Research
Professional Staff of 14
19 33
IIQflfySltFS
Cfccford Biological
Laboratory
CKford, ID
1JQRA/11CSS
Ifeterological
Satellite Lab.
Hillcrcst Heignts, ID
Shellfish
24 041 Research
Larth
Satellite
24 033 Research
Professional Staff of 15
Professional Staff of 23
(69)
10 25 447.8K
(69)
14 37 1,263K
C-l
I
u>
vO
-------
I
O
TABLE J-7. FEDERAL FACILITIES
NATIONAL OCEANOGRAFHIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
AQ^iCY
LABOEM.'ORy
: vjnp.
si' ruier ia i
rcisaaEL
physical navj: bact:
sinn diqlo ograp aur: hiysi piclo ejgej tequ aiwual
SO. IT. GISTS liurs ISVS CISIS GIS1S rcrs ICAL other total euxjtt
RKGION 1
UQM/IUFS
ilslfcrcl Biological
Laboratory'
Ifclford, CT
S£ jell fish
09 009 rtesearch 28,000 tot. 13.
(69)
7 20 347.2K
HORA/i JIffS
Itest Bootnbay Hariwr
Biological Laboratory
Wbst Dootlibay Harbor, IU
Fislieries
23 015 Ffcsearuh
Professional Staff of 17
(69)
17 34 630K
IJQAA/UIFS
Woods llole Biological
Laboratory
Wbods Hole, 11A
Fislieries
25 001 Ifeseardi 24,000 tot.
Professional Staff of 18
(69)
25 43 1,100K
JCftA/ltflES
Uarragansett Marine
Game Fisii Lab.
Providence, PJ
44 009
"iarinG
Cane Fish
Ilesearcli
Prof ess icr.al Staff of 9
13
(72)
29 OK
-------
TABLE J-8. FEDERAL FACILITIES
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
MO
LivBORKiXIKY
st oo M jcriai
iekscieiel
HIYSICAL OCEKJ BACEt:
SIHE BIGLO OGHAP CHD! FUYSI RIOLO EIGEI TCdlK ACTUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HTHS ISTS CISTS GISTS EEES ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
RLGIOli 4
TVA
IJivirannental Biology
Laboratory
i-iiscle £hoals, Ala.
Biological
01 033 Itesearcli
15,000 tot-
Professional Staff of 13
11 24
(71)
260K
TVA
Water Quality Lab.
Giatanooga, Tenn.
Water
Quality
47 065 Research
9,000 tot.
Professional Staff of 9
11 20
(71)
290K
c-<
i
.c»
-------
(-1
I
•>
ho
TABLE J-SL. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U. S. AIR FORCE
achey
L^tiORAroror
regiow 1
U.S. Air Force
Caitiirkige Itesearcu
Laboratories
Bedford, I la.
R E G I 0 II 6
I7J0r.
st ao ruja'iaj
tanote
Sensor
25 017 Ifescardi
FEISaEEL
PHYSICAL aX/il B?£TE
SIZE BIOLC OGKAP CHEII PIIYSI RIQLO EiGHJ HXJflJ MOIUfiL
SQ. FT. GISi'S HERS ISTS CISTS GISTS ECfS ICAL OIKEP, TOTAL BUDCET
689,000 tot.
48
239
173
(71)
1229 52,OOOK
U.S. Air Force
Enviranrtental Ifealth
Laboratory-Kelly
San Antaiio, 'A.
Analysis
48 029 Services
45
RDGIOil 9
U.S. Air Force
Environmental Health
Laboratory - IcClellan
Sacramento, Calif
Water
Quality
06 067 Analysis
13,000 tot.
Scientific Staff of 24
17
41
-------
TABLE J-10. . FEDERAL FACILITIES
U. S. ARMY
paziCY
LAbORKDOKY
;iAJDP-
ST CD EUIJCTiaj
FEPSa^EL
niYSICAL OCEAN BME
SIZE BICLO OGPAP ami FKYSI RTGLO U1GHJ TECH1J ffi.m
so. rr. gists nni?s ists cists gists eees ical other total budget
REGION 3^
U.S. Anry/CE.
Ooastal Engiiieering
Besearda Qenter
Hashiugtcn, D.C.
II E G I O i l 4
Coastal
Processes
II 001 Ussearch
(71)
3,250K
U.S. Arny/Ct
Engineer Waterways
Dcperinent Station
Vicksburg, Ms.
U.S. Anay/CE
District
Wilmington, N.C.
U.S. Arny/Ci;
District
Charleston, S.C.
Waterways/
liivirorumental 41CK off.
28 149 Research 1,394K lab.
Support
Services
37 129 Regulatory
Support
Services
45 019 Begulatory
(Civilian only)
7 25
248
B14 1097
(72)
21,500K
27
-------
Lh
t
¦P-
¦S-
ACliJCY
LfiBQRKIDHY
TABLE J,-U. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
;swor
sr ao pujcriaj
HIYSICAL
SI2L
SQ. FT.
ccm:
BIQLO OGRAP CHI J1
GISTS HEES ISTS
ruisaJiiEL
BfiCIE
HIYSI PIQLO HiGEJ TEQEi
CISTS GISTS EEKS ICftL OTHER TOTAL
£NNUKL
BUDGET
REGION 10
USGS
Water Ifc sources
Division Laboratory
Anclwrage, AK
02 000
Professional staff of 4
-------
TABLE J>U. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
LABORATORY
:iajor
st a) ruucriou
rcj-saciEL
PHYSICAL OCEfli BACZE
SIZE Diax) OGRAP CJiD' HIYSI POKXO EIGDI TECHII ANIJUAL
SO. FT. GISTS IITRS ISTS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTIER TOTAL BUDGET
REGION 6
USGS
Hater ffesouroes
Division Laboratory
Denver, CD
03 031
Professional staff of 8
10
18
USGS
Qaalogy Division
Analytical Laboratory
Deliver, 00
USGS
Hater Ife sources
Division Laboratory
Salt Lake City, UT
08 031 Uesearcli
49 035
(Geological Divisicn Laboratories, (3 locations) iiave a '72' budget
of 2,500K and staff of 140, 70 of vvhem arc professionals).
Professional staff of 6
15
21
REGION 9
USGS
Waiter Resources
Divisicn Laboratory
IJanlo Park, CA
0G 081
Professional staff of 8
10
18
USGS
Gaology Divisicn .
Analytical Laboratory
Ifenlo Park, CA
USGS
Ifater Resources
Divisicn Laboratory
Honolulu, HI
06 031 research
15 003
(Geological Division Laboratories, (3 locations) have a *72' budget
of 2,500K and staff of 140, 70 of when are professionals).
Professional staff of 1
C-t
i
Ln
-------
TABLE J,-1,1. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
pnnsanEL
PHYSICAL CCE7H BflCEE
AOJiicy i vjor sihj biolo ograp uiri hiysi piglo n iguj kxkn amnual
LABORATORY ST a) rUJCTICU SQ. FT. GIST? I UTS ISTS CISTS GISrIS tEKS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGIOti G
USGS
Water Ifesouroes
Division Laboratory
Little Itock, AR 05 119 Professional staff of 2 3 5
USGS
I Jater Hesouroes
Division Laboratory
Baton Rouge, LA 22 033 Professional staff of 1 3 4
USGS
Water Ifesouroes
Division Laboratory
Oklanorra City, CK 40 017 Professional staff of 2 7 9
USGS
Water resources
Division Laboratory
Austin, TK 4o 453 Professional staff of C 13 19
RLGIOJ 7
USGS
Water Itsouroes
Division Laboratory
St. Louis, IO 2D 510 Professicnal staff of 2 0 2
-------
TABLE J-11. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7UGEHCY
LABORATORY
rirjon
st co ruwcriaj
rcnsauEL
HIYSICAL OIK: BACEE
SKK BICLO OGP.AP CUE.'! FIIYSI PIQLO HJGEI TCdG'j ANNUAL
SO. FT. GISTS HITS ISTS CISTS GISTS EEES ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGION 4
USGS
Hater Itesouroes
Division Laboratory
Tuscaloosa, AL
01 125
Professional staff of 1
USGS
Water fesouroes
Division Laboratory
Ocala, FL
12 083
Professional staff of 3
10
USGS
Hater flssouroes
Division Laboratory
Raleigu, 1JC
37 183
Professional staff of 1
REGION 5
USGS
Vfater Resources
Division Laboratory
Colunbus, CH 39 049 Professional staff of 3 5 8
-------
c-l
I
oo
TABLE J-ll. FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
PGllCY
LAUORKTOFY
REGIOM 2
USGS
VJater rfesources
Division Laboratory
Albany, NY
USGS
t fetter It;sources
Division Laboratory
San Juan, PR
RLGIOtJ 3
liTJOl;
st oo KJiicriai
36 QUI
72 930
FcrsaniEL
PHYSICAL OCILAIi BACTE
SIZE BIQLO OQR/iP CHEI! HIYSI RIQLO KIGH-I TEX2HI ANNUAL
SO. FT. GISTS HERS ISTS CISTS GISTS EEI$ ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
Professional staff of 4
Professional staff of 1
12
16
USGS
Water Resources
Division Laboratory
Washington, DC
USGS
Geology Division
Analytical Laboratory
Uasliington, DC
USGS
Water It:sources
Division Laboratory
Karrisburg, PA
USGS
Water Jfesouroes
Division Laboratory
Qiarlottesville, VA
11 001
11 001 It search
42 043
51 540
Professional staff of 10
15
(Geological Pivision Laboratories, (3 Locations) have a *72' budget
of 2,500lC and staff of 140, 70 of whom are professionals).
Professional staff of 4
Professional staff of 1
-------
TABLE J-12. . FEDERAL FACILITIES
U. S. NAVY
ttUJCY
LABORATORY
iiZiJOR
st oo ruijcriai
PHYSICAL
SIZE
so. it.
octjj:
biclo oavr am:
gists urns ists
rcrsaJUEL
b^cte
HIYSI PJQLO DiGE TEQEI
CIS-;S GISTS IXirS ICAL OHEr. TOTAL
AlEJUAL
BUDCET
REGIOIi 1
U.S. ilavy
naval Underwater
Sound Lab.
rlew Lcncion, Ct.
09 Oil It search
RLGIOil 3
U.S. iJavy
Naval Ifesearch
Laboratory
Washington, D.C.
11 001 research 2,000K + tot.
(Civilians only)
Professional Staff of 1233
2172 3405
U.S. Ilavy
Liaval Anadeny
Annapolis, iti.
¦ lilitary/
24 003 educational
C-l
i
•P*
v£>
-------
TABLE J-12. . FEDERAL FACILITIES
U.S. NAVY
AflllCY
LABQKVTOKrr
iiAjor.
sr cd ruicriai
PHYSICAL
si:x
SO. FT.
OCCftJ
diolo ograp a in:
gists i inns ists
FtrsacEL
BACK)
HIYSI RIQLO LliGEJ TECH J
CISTS GISTS LERS ICAL. OxHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUDGET
REGIOH 9
U.S. Navy
Naval Postgraduate
Scliool
Dept. of Oceanography
Itnterey, CA
I Iilitary
Educational/
06 053 Research
Facility of 16
U.S. Navy
Naval Uhdersea
Ife search and
Development Genter
San Diego, Ca.
Ooeanoaraphic
06 073 Desearch
U.S. Navy
Naval Civil
Engineering Lab.
Port Huenerne, Calif.
Naval
Construction 51,500 off.
06 111 research 119,000 lab.
Professional Staff of 136
(71)
190 326 9,000K
REGION 10
U.S. Navy
Office of Naval Research
Naval Artie
Ifesearcli Laboratory
Barrow, iik.
Scientific
Support of
Artie
02 000 Ffcsearch
45,000 tot.
Professional Staff of 30
(69)
110 140 2,500K
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
A3IJCY
LABORATORY
IIWOR
st co FUHcria:
fEESCNNEL
HIYSICAL OdlTil BACm
SIZE BIQLO OGRAP GH3t PHYSI RIQLO QIGIK TECEN AMIJUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HEPS ISTS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGION 1
Connecticut 3iellfish
Ccnmissicn
tfUfbrcl, CT
Maine Department of Health
and Vtelfare
Public Health Laboratory
Augusta, l»E
Maine uivixainental
InytovBient Canrdssion
Diagnostic Laboratory
Augusta, IE
flaine Departanent of Sea
and Shane Fisheries
Fisheries Research Stations
Booth Bay Harbor, it
Massachusetts Department
national Ifeaources
Cat Gave Marine Lab
Salem, MA
Massachusetts
Division of Marine
Fisheries, Dept. of
Natural Iteaources
Boston, MA
09 009 Regulatory
Public Service/
23 Oil Regulatory 15,000 tot.
23 011 Itegulatory
Public Service/
23 015 Researdi 8,000 tot.
25 009 Itegulatory
Scientific Staff of 15
Scientific Staff of 16
Scientific Staff of 22
25 025 Regulatory
C_i
I
in
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
EERSCllNEL
OCEAN BACEE
biojo ograp am fhysi rkxo hjgbj techn annual
GISTS HERS ISTS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL CHHER TOTAL BUDCET
REGION 1
Fhode Island Department
National Resources
Wickford Research Lab
Wick ford, HI 44 009 Regulatory
HtYSICAL
AQ31CY MAJOR SIZE
LABORATORY ST CO RJNCTICN SQ. FT.
REGION 2
interstate Sanitaticn
Commission 1,000 off.
Mew York, NY 36 061 Regulatory 2,000 lab. 4 4 2 11 21
Now York City
Dept. of Health
Microbiology Lab.
New York, NY 36 061 Regulatory 5,000 tot. 19 6 25
New York city
Dept. of Health
Bureau of Sanitary
Engineering
New York, iJY 36 061 Regulatory 1,000 tot. 4 15
IJew York City
Environmental
Protection Administration
New York, NY 36 061 Regulatory
I: Jew York State
Dept. of Hwircnmental
Conservation
Rxikonkcroa, NY 36 103 Itegulatory 2,000 tot. 1 2 2 2 7
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AC321CY
LAI30RKT0FS(
TIMOR
ST GO FUlJCTiai
PHYSICAL
si a:
SQ. IT.
OCEH1
BICfLO OGRAP ami
GISTS 1EES ISTS
fepscunel
B7\CTE
HiYSI PJOLO EUGIN TEQCi
CISTS GISTS ECRS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUDCET
RtGIOU 3
Delaware Department
national Ifesouraes &
Environmental Control
Div. Control Lab
Dover, C£
10 001 Hsgulatory
Scientific Staff of 4
REGION 4
Alabama Dept. of
Cense rvarticn
Seafoods Division
Ilarine Resources
Laboratory
Dai^iiin Is., AL
Alabama Department
of Conservation &
natural Iteaources
Ilarine Resources Lab
Dauphin Isl., I\L
Lhiv. of Alabama
{•iarine Science Institute
Bayou La. Barbe, AL
Alabama VJater Inpruverent
Commission
Habile Lab.
Montgomery, AL
Fisheries
rte search/
01 097 Regulatory
Fisheries
01 097 Research 7,000 lab.
Educational/
01 097 Research
01 101 Regulatory 288 tot.
Scientific Staff of 8
8 19 636K
i
u>
-------
Ch
(J. TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
M2JCY
LABORATORY
ST CO
IiTSJOR
nxiicriaj
HrYSICRL
SIZE
SO. FT.
OOEfll
biolo OGRflp a in '
GISTS HCHS ISIS
FEKSattJEL
BACEE
HIYSI PJQLO EJGEi TECHN
CISTS GISTS EEES ICAL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
Buixirr
U G I ON 4
Florida Department of
natural Ifesouroes
Field Laboratory
vest Palm Beacii, IL 12 009 Ifcsearch
Florida Department
of Health
Bureau of Laboratories
Dade Go. Pesticide Lab.
Miami, FL 12 025 Ifcgulatory . 1,500 off. Scientific Staff of 3 3 2 8 400K
Dade County
Pollution Control
Laboratory 3,700 off.
Miami, EL 12 025 Ifegulatory 1,100 lab Scientific Staff of 33 9 7 49 400K
Miami Department of
Hater and Sewers
Sewage Treatment
Plant Laboratory
Miami, FL
Sewage
Treatment
12 025 Plant
Scientific Staff of 3
1,683K
Florida Department
of Health
Regional Laboratory
Miami, EL 12 025 Itegulatory
Florida Division
of Health
Bureau of Sanitary
Engineering
itegional Laboratory 405 off.
Pensaoola, FL 12 033 Regulatory 1G0 lab. 2 13
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
aGEiOf
LABORATORY
JFwJDR
srr oo ruicriai
HIYSICAL
SIZE
SQ. IT.
OCEAN
bicijO ogpap aini
GISTS IEPS ISTS
FEISaEIEL
QAdC
HiYSI KTCSLO Q1GEJ TECHN
CISTS GISTS EEIS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
suixirr
EEGIOI] 4
Florida Division
of Healtli
Bureau of Laboratories
Regional Laboratory 500 off.
Pensaoola, EL 12 033 Regulatory 4,500 lab. 4 2 4 10
Florida Department
of Natural Resources
Field Laboratory
Pensacola, FL 12 033 Ifesearnh 100 tot. 1 1
Florida Department of natural
Resources
Held Laboratory
Stuart, PL 12 085 Research
Florida Department
of Natural Hesouraes
Marine Laboratory
St. Peter&urg, EL 12 103 Research 40,000 lab. Scientific Staff of 54 37 91 1,000K
Florida Dept. of
Pollution Control
Regional Laboratory
Gulf Breeze, EI, 12 113 Rsgulatory 5,180 tot. 1 1 2 4 2 10 140K
Florida Department of
Natural Resources
Field Lab.
San ford, EL 12 117 Research
i
U1
l_n
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
Ln
O.
ACHJCY
LABORATORY
REGION 4
MAJOK
st co rujcriai
HIYSICAL
SIZE
SQ. IT.
OCEAN
BIQLO OGRAP CHD1
GISTS irJS ISTS
pcrsaiEL
BACTE
FHYSI RIQLO E31GE-J TECHN
CISTS GISTS EEIS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUEX£T
Georgia State
Vteter Quality
Ccntrol Board
Atlanta, GA
GBorgia Dept.
Of Mines, Mining
and Geology
Atlanta, GA
Georgia Game
and Fish
Catmissicn
Brunswick, GA
Mississippi Air & Water
Pollution Control
Southern Station
Ilattiesburg, IE
itorth Carolina Dept.
of Onservatim & Development
Division of Camercial
& ££ort Fisheries
Morehead City, IJC
South Carolina
Wildlife Resources Dept.
Marine Resources Div.
Charleston, SC
Waste Water
Treatment
and Ccntrol
13 121 Ffcgulatory
13 121 Research
Estuarine
13 127 Research
28 035 Regulatory
Fisheries
37 031 Research
Fisheries
Estuarine &
Marsh
45 019 Studies
16
(Scientific Staff cnly)
11 3
Scientific Staff of 5
12
30
23
1 10
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AGI2JCY
LABORATORY
MAJOR
sr oo Rjucriai
hiysical
SIZE
SQ. FT.
OCEM-I
BIQLO OGRAP CHEM
GISTS IEIS ISTS
FEISaSJKL
Bacte
FHYSI PJOLO EIGEi TECHJ
CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
AK'JUAL
BUDCTTr
REGIOU 4
Soutii Carolina
Pollution Control Authority
Sullivans Island Lab.
Sullivans Island, SC
Soutii Carolina
Water Ite sources
Ccranissim
Golixnbia, SC
Ifegulatory
45 019 Iixiitoring 4,000 tot.
45 079 Regulatory
REGIOU 5
State of Ohio
Dept. of Liatural
Ife sources
dolurbus, CH
Minnesota Dept.
of Health Lab.
tlinneaqpolis, IN
Michigan Water
Itesources Cocmissicn
laboratory
Lansing, III
Lake Erie
Ite source
39 049 Planning
27 053 Ifegulatory
26 065 Regulatory
Minnesota Dept.
of Conservation
St. Paul, MI
State Uater
tesourse
27 123 Managenent
C-l
I
Ln
-------
c-l
I
In
00
ASJJCY
LABORATORY
REGION 6
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
tIMOR
sr cu Euncrion
PHYSICAL
SIZE
SQ. FT.
OCErtJ
BICiLO OGRAP cum
GISTS HUS ISTS
HCRSCNtlEL
BACTE
HIYSI RIQLO EUGEi TECUM
CISTS GISTS EE PS ICAL OTHER TOTAL
AI5NUAL
BUDC3.T
Louisana Fisli & Wildlife
Cannassicn
Rockefeller Wildlife
Rifuge Lab
Grand Chenier, LA
Louisiana, wildlife
and Fisheries Ccrmission
Baton Rouge, LA
Louisiana State Univ.
Barataria Bay Facility
Barataria Bay, LA
Louisiana State
Department of
Health - Chemistry
Laboratory
I jew Orleans, LA
Louisiana Fish & Wildlife
Ccrtmission
Grand Terre Isld. Lab
I Jew Orleans, LA
Texas Parte and
Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries
Br ana i
Rockport Ilarine Lab.
Reexport, TX
Pfesearch/
22 023 Regulatory
Wildlife
Resource
22 033 Management
lilucational/
22 051 Itesearcli
Public
22 071 Health
Ffeseardi/
22 071 Itegulatory
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries
ffcsearch in
48 007 Oransas Bay
20,000 tot.
2 16
+ 10+
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
C-i
¦
Ln
v£>
POlid
LABOPiffOKY
MAJOR
sr cd Hjucriai
PHYSICAL OCCAM BflCTE
SIZE BIQLO OGRAP aiETl IHYSI RIQLO EJGEI TECHN At-EJUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HEBS ISTS CISTS GISTS EEES ICAL OIHER TOTAL BUDGET
REGION 6
Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department
Ooastal Fisheries
Branch
Seadrift Field Lab.
Seadrift, TX
48 057
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries
Ftesearch in
San Antonio Bay
System
Texas Parks and
Wild! i fie Department
Coastal Fisheries
Branch
Arroyo City Field Lab.
Harlingen, TX
48 061
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries
fteseardi
Lower Laguna
I lad re Bay
Texas State Dept.
of Health
Regional Laboratory
San Benito, TX
Public
Service/
48 061 Itegulatory
1«300 tot.
6 1
Texas State Dept.
of Health
Regional Laboratory
LaManjue, TX
Public
Service/
48 167 Regulatory
1,100 tot.
2 1
Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries
Branch
Sea Brook Marine
Laboratory
Seabrook, IX
48 201
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries
Research in
Galveston Bay
5 1 13
-------
c-l
I
c*
o
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AQUCY
LABORATORY
TIMOR
ST CO RWCriQtl
PEESCtNEL
PHYSICAL OCEAIf BACIE
SIZE BICLO OGRAP CHEH HIYSI RIOLO ENGIN TECHN fttJUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HERS ISIS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUDdT
REGION 6
Texas State Dept.
of Health
Regional Laboratory
Houston, TX
Public
Service/
48 201 Regulatory
10,000 tot.
10 4 39
Texas State Dept.
of Health
Ifegional Laboratory
Port Arthur, TX
Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries
Brand i
Marine Fisheries
Research Station
Palacios, TX
Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries
Branch
Flour Bluff Field Lab
Corpus Oiristi, TX
Ufexas Parks and
Wildlife Department
Coastal Fisheries
Brandt
Corpus Oiristi
Field Laboratory
Oorpus Oiristi, TX
Public
Service/
48 245 Regulatory
800 tot.
2 15
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries/
I^riculture
Research in
48 321 Matagorda Bay
Biology/
Fisheries
Hesearch in
Upper Laguna
Madrc and
48 355 Baffin Bay
Marine
Biology/
Fisheries
Ife search
Corpus Oiristi
48 355 Bay System
113
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AClijCY
LABOKOTOKY
tWOR
ST 00 FUJCi'ICIJ
PEI5QC3EL
nrcsiciiL ocmi bacte
gizl Bio/) oopap am- physi riqlo ungej techh minual
sq. rr. gis'.s uns isis cists gists ens ical other total budctt
RLG IOii G_
Texas State Dept.
of Health
Itegional Laboratory
Corpus Giristi, TX
RLGIOII 9
Public
Service/
4b 3i)j Regulatory 1,000 tot.
1 10
Calif. State Dept. of
Puulic Health
Sanitation and
Radiation Lab.
Berkeley, CA
Calif Lept. of Fish
and Gaae
Marine Rise arch
Laboratory
Eureka, CA
Calif. Dept. of Fish
and Game
State Fist varies
Laboratory
Long Beach, CA
Calif. Dei*. of Fish
and Gane
i iarine tfcsearch
Laboratory
Itnterey, CA
06 001 Itegulatory
/Iarine
Fisheries
OC 023 Jtesearch
: larine
Fisiieries
00 037 Ffesearcn
iarine
Fisheries
06 053 lfcsearci
Staff of 30
30 400K
c-,
(7>
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AOJUCY
LABOROTOKSf
SI' CO
1 i*\JOR
RTJCTICU
HIYSICAL
sizi:
SO. FT.
octa;
BIQLO OGRAP ani'
GISTS IDTiS ISIS
PErsaiiEL
bach;
HIYSI PJCQLO KIGTJ TECHN
CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL CTfflER TOTAL
ANNUAL
BUDGET
RL GIOH 9_
Calif. Dept. of Fish
and Game
tlarine Culture Lab.
Itanterey, CA 06 053
Calif. Dept. of Fisii
and Game
Fisn and Wildlife
Pollution Control Lab.
Ranciio Cordova, CA 06 067
Calif. Dept. of Fisii
and Game
Fisii Disease
Laboratory
Randio Cordova, CA
Fisii
Disease
Ob 067 Research
Calif. State Dept. of
Fisn and Game
Stockton ltesearch
Facility
Stockton, CA 06 077 Research 4,000 tot. 10 1 11 130K
Calif. Dept. of Fish
and Game
Marine Research
Laboratory
florro Bay, CA
I'arine
Fisiieries
06 079 It; search
-------
TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
AOIJCY
LrtBORHTOKT
MAJOR
ST 00 IUJCTIQJ
HJKSCtiEL
PHYSICAL 0CETC1 BfiCTC
SIZE BIQLO OGRAP CHC1 HIYSI RICLO illGIW TEQEJ ANNUAL
SQ. FT. GISTS HEPS ISTS CISTS GISTS EDFS ICAL OniER TOTAL BUDCTTT
REGION 9
Calif. Dept. of Fish
and Game
Marine Resources.
Operations
1-fenlo Park, CA
Marine
Fisheries
06 081 Research
Hawaii State
Dept. of Healtli
Honolulu, HI
15 003 Regulatory 3,200 tot.
16
REGION 10
Alaska Dept.
of Envircrmental
Conservation
Juneau, AK
02 000 Regulatory
Fish Oomissicn
of Oregon
Marine Research Lab.
itewport, OR
Fisheries
Regulation/
41 041 Rasmrch 9,000 tot.
Scientific Staff of 18
2 20
Oregon state Board
of Health Lab.
Portland, OR
Biological
Analysis
far
41 051 Other Ags.
1,000 tot.
c-<
i
LO
Dept. of thviramental
Quality Lab.
State of Oregon
Bevertcn, OR
rtequlatory
all
41 067 Eoosystern 10,000 tot.
-------
c-i
^ TABLE J-13 STATE FACILITIES
•>
AQ1JCY
LftBQRS£D0F2f
IIAJOR
sr oo ruucriai
FCRSaiEL
niYSICAL OCEAIJ BfiCTE
SIZE BIOLO OGRAP CHE11 FKYSI RIQLO ENGIU TECJIIJ ANJKJAL
SO. FT. GISTS HERS ISTS CISTS GISTS EERS ICAL OTHER TOTAL BUXET
REGION 10
Wash. Dept. of Fisheries
Willapa Siellfisli Lab.
Ocean Park, WA
Fislieries
53 049 Research
1,000 off.
1,200 lab.
1 1 3 50K
Dept. of Ecology
State of V&siiingtcn
Olympia, WA
Itegulatory
all
I>3 067 Ecosystem
10,000 tot.
10
13 12K
Dept. of Social and Health
Services
State of Washington
Olynpia, WA
+5%
Water
Quality
53 067 Analysis
-------
APPENDIX K
INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING
MONITORING ACTIVITY
-------
APPENDIX K
INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING MONITORING ACTIVITY
The relationship of water quality monitoring activities in the coastal zone
with several demographic and other factors, has been investigated using
standard statistical correlation techniques the results of which are
shown in tables K-l, K-2, and K-3. Tables K-l and K-2 were generated from
data aggregated at the county level for each coastal EPA region and for
major segments of the coast line. As may be seen by inspeqtion of the
correlation coefficients, some areas have possible significant correlations,
but no real systematic pattern is discernible among the regions. This leads
to the general conclusion that there are no strong relationships between
monitoring activity and population, land area, or municipal or industrial
waste discharges.
Table K-3 shows a possible strong relation between monitoring activities and
miles of general shoreline. However, these correlations are not as signifi-
cant as those in the previous tables as these coefficients were generated
from data aggregated to the regional level yielding only eight samples
per variable. At best one can assume from an analysis like this that there
is a slight tendency for monitoring activities bo be more or less equally
distributed along the shoreline. Such an interpretation is only valid from
the standpoint of the entire coastal zone and can not expect to be appli-
cable in any specific area.
K-l
-------
Table K-l
CORRELATIONS WITH AMOUNT (1) OF MONITORING
Industrial
Municipal
No. of
Region
Population
Area
Discharge
Discharge
Mon, Stations
1
.227
.044
.007
-.014
.049
2
.203
-.036
.387
.407
.263
3
.536
-.128
-.046
.725
.656
4
.664
.330
.144
.599
.482
5
. 162
-. 110
.162
. 180
.203
6
.157
-. 102
-.189
.147
.517
9
-.178
.284
-.102
-.142
.301
10
.833
-.019
.007
.839
.745
East Coast
.384
.211
.170
.342
.738
West Coast
-.018
.115
.054
-.019
.437
Great Lakes
.161
-.102
.162
.180
.203
Gulf Coast
.139
-.051
-.077
.110
.427
(1) Measurements per year.
Table K-2
CORRELATIONS WITH NUMBER OF MONITORING STATIONS
Industrial
Municipal
Monitoring
Region
Population
Area
Discharge
Discharge
Quantity
1
.383
.043
.185
.058
.049
2
.283
-. 184
. 140
.246
.263
3
.599
.142
.250
.426
.656
4
.613
.381
.261
.595
.731
5
.815
-.006
.512
.079
.203
6
-.042
-.125
-.207
-.204
.517
9
.436
.089
.687
.457
.301
10
.450
-.082
-.130
.462
.745
East Coast
.362
.355
.084
.193
.738
West Coast
.419
.031
.436
.422
.437
Great Lakes
.815
-.001
.512
.079
.203
Gulf Coast
.060
.014
.002
.077
.427
NOTE: Correlation coefficients are in the range 1 to -1. Those coeffic-
ients greater than about 0.6 (or less than -0.6) indicate a possibly
significant relationship.
K-2
-------
Table K-3
CORRELATIONS WITH DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS & WQ LABS
No. of
Stations
No. of Meas,
Per Year
Miles of Shore
Tidal General
Population Densities
.484
.297
.936
.637
Per Mi
Tidal
.406
.353
Per Mi
General
-.357
-.462
No. of
Labs
.285
-.137
K-3/4
-------
APPENDIX L
SYNOPSIS OF APPROACH TO ACQUIRE INFORMATION
COVERING THE EXISTING WATER QUALITY
MONITORING ACTIVITY
-------
APPENDIX L
SYNOPSIS OF APPROACH TO ACQUIRE INFORMATION
COVERING THE EXISTING WATER QUALITY
MONITORING ACTIVITY
Since the main thrust of this effort was to determine the effects on
monitoring, first consideration was given to possible sources of data on
water quality monitoring activities.
Retrievals were run on the EPA's STORET to derive information on water
quality monitoring activities; results were not completely satisfactory
since the STORET system was designed to operate as a user-oriented
storage and retrieval system for water quality data, and was not intended
to produce data on water quality monitoring activities.
It was determined that a primary source of applicable water quality
monitoring information for this study was the Office of Water Data
Coordination (OWDC) file. To organize and retrieve the data in EPA,
USGS, and other automated files, a machine-readable definition of the
coastal zone was required. To this end, a coastal cross reference list
and file was developed; this file is described on the following pages:
L-l
-------
L-l CROSS REFERENCE LIST
The development process for the cross reference list (appendix A) is
illustrated in figure L-l. The cross reference list is shown manually
generated from various sources. This list defines the coastal zone,
for purposes of this project, in terms of several geographical descriptors.
Additonal processing was performed on the cross reference list to produce
listings and machine-readable copies of the coastal map numbers and
letters, and the coastal state and county numbers. These were used as
"masks" to select data from several national data banks.
L-2
-------
USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC
MAPS
GSA
HANDBOOK
IEC OCEAN
REGION
CODES
MISC. MAPS
6 ATLASES
OWDC MAPS
HANDBOOK
IEC
MANUAL SELECTION &
ENCODING OF COASTAL ZONE
DATA.EDITING, CONVERSION
TO MAGNETIC TAPE
CROSS
REF
LIST
CROSS REF
REPORT
IEC
ABRIDGED
CR FILE
PROCESSING
COASTAL
MAP NOS.
£ LETTERS
COASTAL
STATE-CO
LIST
COASTAL
STATE-CO
LIST
FIGURE L-l
CROSS REFERENCE FILE
-------
L-2 state water quality standards review
In developing the state water quality criteria inventory, several sources
of data were utilized. The primary sources were the EPA documents
entitled "Evaluation of Implementation Plans", and "FWQA Status Reports on
Enforcement Conference Recommendations". Another valuable source was the
American Public Health Association's document, "Water Quality Standards."
Where detailed data was necessary, direct telephone interviews were
conducted with knowledgeable personnel at management level in state
government. The block diagram below indicates the methods used to acquire
and tabulate this information.
EPA
REPORTS
AMER. PUB
HEALTH
IEC
TABULATION
OF DATA
STATE WQ
STANDARDS
REPORT
L-4
-------
L-3 DATA BANKS
Numerous sources were developed for the review and assessment of active
water quality data banks. Relevant data was provided by reports of the
Interagency Committee for Marine Environmental Prediction (ICMAREP) and
the Subcommittee on Marine Environmental Baselines and Monitoring
(SC-MBM). Another useful document was the Directory of Environmental
Pollution Information and Data Programs, prepared by the 1971 Ad Hoc
Committee (SEQUIP). Telephone contacts provided timely detail as to
current data banks and operating characteristics.
MAIL £
LITERATURE
REVIEW
TELECON
CONTACT!
I£C
SELECTION
PROCESSING
& TABULATION
DATA BANK
INVENTORY
REPORTS
L-5
-------
L-4 environmental inventory
Environmental data for the coastal counties was gleaned from several
standard sources, converted to machine readable form and listed, using
the method shown in the block diagram below.
U.S. COAST
PILOT, TIDE
TABLES
CLIMATO -
LOGICAL E
3THER ATLAS
DATA
ENVIRON-
MENTAL
INVENTORY
PROCESSING
IEC
MANUAL SELECTION " 8
ENCODING OF COASTAL
ZONE DATA
IEC
L-6
-------
L-5 MUNICIPAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
A card deck list of coastal states and counties was used to select
specified data from EPA's municipal waste facilities inventory file per
the block diagram below. This list was further edited and processed to
produce the municipal waste discharge summary and detail reports.
CASE STUDY
g PERSONAL
CONTACT
J5ATA>"
MUNICIPAL
DISCHARGE
REPORTS
r MUN
DISCH
, DATA
'MUN^
DISCH
FILE
{ COASTAL
STATE-CO.
LIST
UPDATE PER
CASE STUDY g
OTHER DATA,
FILL BLANKS.
IEC
EPA WASH.
SELECT COASTAL
MUNICIPAL
DISCHARGE
DATA
L-7
-------
L-6 1970 CENSUS AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE INVENTORY
A coastal state and county list was used, per the block diagram below,
to select 1970 Census and Industrial Discharge data, which was subsequently
processed to produce the Industrial Discharge Summary and detail reports.
(The EPA is scheduled to bring on-line a file on industrial discharges,
but it was still in process of creation and validation at the time of this
COASTAL
STATE-CO.
LIST
writing.)
CENSUS
BUREAU
REPORTS
DATA
INDUSTRIAL
DISCHARGE
REPORTS
:ensus
£ IND
DISCH
SUMMARY
REPORT
PROCESSING
IEC
SELECT COASTAL
CENSUS DATA,
ESTIMATE
INDUSTRIAL
DISCHARGE
PRC
L-8
-------
L-7 STEAM - ELECTRIC AND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INVENTORY
Thermal discharge data was very difficult to obtain, as no national
machine readable files were located for this information. The National
Estuarine Inventory file yielded only 26 thermal discharge records (23 in
Hawaii, 3 in Texas). The prime input for this survey was obtained
manually from the Federal Power Commission's file on power plants (data
to 1969) in accordance with the block diagram below.
VARIOUS
REPORTS
EPA
MICROFICHE
FILE ON
FED PWR COMM
POWER PLANT
DATA^
IEC
MANUAL
SELECTION S
ENCODING OF
THERMAL DATA
THERMAL
DISCHARGE
REPORT
L-9
-------
l-8 ocean dumping inventory
Information was gathered from the literature as well as personal contact,
phone contacts, and mail surveys. Primarily, Corps of Engineers Districts
and EPA Regional Offices were contacted. The block diagram below indicates
the methods used to develop the ocean dumping file.
MAIL S
TELECON
CONTACTS
LITERATURE
REVIEW
IEC
MANUAL
SELECTION 6
PROCESSING
OCEAN
DUMPING
REPORT
L-10
-------
L-9 water quality monitoring inventory
A machine readable list of coastal map numbers and letters was forwarded
to the Water Quality Protection Branch, Office of Air and Water Programs,
EPA, Washington, D.C., where it was used to select over 3,500 records from
the U.S. Geological Survey's nationwide file on water data. The file was
further edited, selecting only those items of coastal zone interest, then
augmented with data on specific monitoring activities from each of the
Phase B case study areas to produce a summary water quality monitoring
file by state and county. This data was used to produce the monitoring
activity information in summary form by EPA region and state, and in
detail to the county level.
L-ll
-------
OWDC
WATER
DATA
OWDC
MAP NOS.
£ LETTERS
SELECT COASTAL
WATER QUALITY
MONITORING
DATA
EPA WASH
ONIT-
ORING
DATA
CASE STUDY
MONITORING
DATA
IEC
UPDATE PER CASE
STUDY DATA
PROCESS
SUMMARY REPORT
MONITORING
ACTIVITY
REPORTS
10NIT-
"•^ORING
.FILE
FIGURE L-2
WATER QUALITY MONITORING INVENTORY
L-12
-------
L-10 LABORATORIES INVENTORY
Information was obtained from recent publications, interviews and
correspondence, as well as from material derived in connection with the
Phase B case study investigations. The information was sorted into three
basic categories (federal, state, and educational), and were listed by
states and counties within each EPA region. The block diagram below indicates
the general approach.
VARIOUS
PUBLICATION
INTERVIEWS
CASE STUDY
REPORTS
CORRESPOND
IEC
SORTING
LISTING
FEDERAL
FACILITIES
REPORT
STATE
FACILITIES
REPORT
EDUCATIONAL
FACILITIES
REPORT
L-13
-------
L-11 INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS EFFECTING MONITORING ACTIVITY
Statistical analyses and comparative summary reports were generated by
accessing data from the several files and aggregating it by various geo-
graphical units in the cross reference file, per the block diagram below.
(For instance, by ocean region, East Coast, West Coast, etc.). Also, by
using the IEC detailed case study information in the cross reference file,
specific individual reports were compiled on each of the case study areas.
MONIT-
ORING
V FILE /
REPORT
ANALYSIS
' MUNn
DISCH
. FILE,
CROSS
REF
vFILE
SELECT, SORT AND
PROCESS DATA INTO
SPECIAL REPORTS AND
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
IEC
L-14
-------
APPENDIX M
LABORATORY COST EVALUATIONS
-------
APPENDIX M
LABORATORY COST EVALUATIONS
M.l FIRST COST EVALUATION
Supplied by: Calgon Corporation
Calgon Center, Box 1346
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
Dolores Bassett and Earl L. Henn
Automation in laboratory analysis can affect cost reductions where there
is a continuity of work flow. This was demonstrated in two recent cost
evaluations conducted in separate facilities and in several of the price
listings discovered during the field survey. We have included these two
evaluations by way of illustrating incremental cost variations which are
volume related.
The unit time charges correspond to the "attention time" necessary to
perform a particular test. "Attention time" includes sample preparation,
equipment and/or reagent setup, running the test, calculations and clean-
up. Table M-l shows a summary of cost savings associated with automated
methods. Table M-2 shows accuracy of manual vs. automated methods; in
each determination, the automated method performs more quickly--anywhere
from a third to a. fifteenth the time required for manual methods.
M-l
-------
TABLE Ml
TIME/COST COMPARISON
MANUAL VS. AUT(MATED
Time/Hours
Per 100 Determinations
Hours Saved
Dollar Savings
Annual Savings
Dollars Saved Per
Determination
Manual
Autoanalyzer
Per 100 Determinations
Per 100 Determinations
5000 Determii
Ammonia N
32
2
30
$ 225.00
$ 11,250
Kjeldahl N
50
5
45
337.50
16,875
Nitrate
9
2
7
52.50
2,625
Phosphate
8
3
5
37.50
1,875
Chloride
9
3
6
45.00
2,250
Silica
12
3
9
67.50
3,375
Sulfate
10
_2
_8
60.00
3,000
TOTALS
130
20
110
$ 825.00
$ 41,250
-------
TABLE M2
ACCURACY AND PRECISION DATA
MANUAL VS. AUTOMATED METHODS
Concentration
Relative Error, %
Relative
Std. Deviation,
Analysis
mg/1
Manual
Autoanalyzer
Manual
Autoanalyzer
Ammonia Nitrogen
2.5
0.4
0.8
+
2.8
+ 1.6
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
25.0
8.4
0.8
+
3.0
+ 1.6
Nitrate
40.0
0.5
0.25
+
1.3
Or tho-Phosphate
5.0
2.4
0.4
+
1.0
+ 1.0
Chloride
50.0
0.8
+
o
00
Silica
50.0
0.4
4.2
+
1.2
+ 2.8
Sulfate
100.0
0.3
1.5
+
0.7
+ 2.4
-------
Manpower dollar savings amounts to $41,250 annually per 35,000 determina-
tions .
M.2 SECOND COST EVALUATION
Supplied by: Water Department, City of Philadelphia
1160 Municipal Services Building
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
Michael J. McGuire, Project Engineer
The water quality parameters that seemed to be the most adaptable to
automation included inorganic phosphate, orthophosphate, ammonia, nitrite,
nitrate, chloride, chemical oxygen demand and total alkalinity. The
following water quality parameters were then selected for a detailed
economic analysis: total phosphate, orthophosphate, ammonia, nitrite,
nitrate and chloride. The Autoanalyzer II was chosen for its applicability
and potential economic feasibility. There was no analysis time cost
factor for any parameter except Cl because the study involved a comparison
between the previous and a proposed system.
The first step was to assign unit costs per analysis to each manual
technique. The unit costs were then combined into a cost-per-run for
each method and further compiled into total costs-per-year so that the
automated versus manual costs could be directly compared and an amortiz-
ation period for the instrument could be calculated.
Table M-3 shows the breakdown of the unit costs, the difference per year
(or savings), and the final calculations arriving at an amortization
M-4
-------
TABLE M3
UNIT COST BREAKDOWN, AMORITIZED
AUTOMATED MANUAL
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Instrument
Reagent
Time
Total
Total
Total
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Parameter
($/test)
($/test)
($/test)
($/test)
($/week) ($/week)
no3
.248
.01
—
.258
5.93
31.44
PO. T
4
.344
.01
--
.354
8.14
12.35
Cl
.239
.01
.060
.309
7.11
9.06
po4o
.267
.01
--
.277
6.37
9.41
no2
.241
.01
--
.241
5.54
18.15
NH3
.304
.01
--
.304
6.99
18.28
TOTAL
$40.88
$98.69
Total Cost/Year
Manual
98.69
x 52 -
$5,130
Automated
40.08
x 52 =
$2,080
Difference
per year..
$3,050
Capital Outlay = $19
,647
Amortization Period ;
= $19,647/$4,
120a =4.8
years
a
includes
a 35% burden
on the $3
,050
M-5
-------
period for the equipment of 4.8 years. The instrument cost comprised
two components; a basic cost that included the straight-line depreciated
cost of the basic components of the Autoanalyzer II over ten years and a
parameter cost that comprised the actual cost of each analytical module
also straightline depreciated over ten years. The time of analysis for
each parameter consisted of the warm-up time, module changeover time and
actual analysis time for each parameter. The labor cost was calculated
on the basis of an average operator's salary. The reagent and expendable
costs were estimated at one cent per test.
M-6
-------
APPENDIX N
LEGISLATION INVENTORY
-------
APPENDIX N
LEGISLATION INVENTORY
Legislation enacted by thirty coastal states to provide water quality
control and/or the establishment of a specific water quality monitoring
system was received and inventoried. This matrix, is an inventory, by
state, of pertinent legislation, and a description thereof; the enforce-
ment agency charged to maintain surveillance over and control of the
water quality of each state; and the jurisdiction of that agency.
The matrix represents a broad, but thorough, analysis of current legislation
and related matters. In addition, comments on existing monitoring, standards
and guidelines are included. In most cases, one will find little
similarity between state legislation and regulations affecting water
quality standards and controls.
N-l
-------
State:
ALABAMA
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. ALABAMA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT - (Act No.
1260, Laws of 1971, Regular Session; Approved
by the Governor September 22, 1971).
2. ALABAMA WATER QUALITY CRITERIA - (Adopted May 5,
1967; Amended June 19, 1967).
Comments: This Act created the Water Improvement Commission,
which consists of seven members. This Commission
is entrusted with the responsibility for control-
ling pollution in the State's waters. As such,
the Commission is authorized to adopt appropriate
rules and regulations and to establish standards
of water quality that will further the public
interest.
If the Commission believes that any of its orders
are being violated, it may conduct an Investigation
and, after appropriate notice, hold a hearing on
the matter. Any individual who violates a rule
or regulation of the Commission or a provision
of the Control Act is subject to a fine of not
less than $100 nor more than $10,000, for each
day that the violation continues. The sum may
be recovered In a civil action In the Circuit
Court. Either the Commission, the Attorney Gen-
eral or any District Attorney may bring such a
civil action to recover damages for pollution of
the State's waters.
N-2
-------
State: Alaska
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA-
TION ACT - (Laws of Alaska, Title 42,
Chapter 46, Department of Environmental
Conservation; Effective July 1, 1971).
Comments:
The Department of Environmental Conservation is the
Agency authorized by this Act to take the necessary measures
to control and abate the pollution of the waters of Alaska.
The Department, after public hearings, is to establish
standards for water pollution. It establishes plans and pro-
grams for control of water pollution throughout the State.
Pursuant to this authority, the Department now requires all
commercial or industrial operations which dispose of solid or
liquid waste material in the waters of the state to obtain a
permit for such disposal from the Department.
Section 710 of the Act provides that: "No person
may pollute or add to the pollution of the air, land, subsur-
face land or water of the state." Section 760 provides that
a person who violates §710 may be guilty of a misdemeanor
and upon conviction may be punished with a fine of not more
than $25,000, or by imprisonment for not more than one year,
or by both. Section 890 indicates that either a state
employee authorized by the Commissioner or a police officer
of the state may enforce the directives of the department.
N-3
-------
State: Connecticut
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Connecticut Clearn Water Act - Conn.
General Statutes, Ch. 47(a) (Public
Act #57 of 1967 as amended in 1971)
2. Connecticut Phosphate Detergents Act.
Public Act. #248
Comments:
The Commissioner of Environmental Protection
is responsible for administering this action for developing
comprehensive plans for controlling new of existing water
pollution with appropriate public hearings. He is also
responsible for coordinating these activities with other
state and federal agencies and for filing all necessary re-
ports with the appropriate federal agency to qualify the
state for federal assistance grants when available. He
can make State grants to municipalities constructing or re-
building abatement facilities.
The Commissioner is empowered to issue, modify and
enforce orders prohibiting or abating pollution or requiring
construction or modification of pollution control devices or
any other remedial activities necessary to control or abate
N-4
-------
pollution.
He may require any person of municipality to
keep appropriate records and to examine such records at any
time.
The Commissioner is required to adopt standards
for water quality applicable to the various waters of the
state.
After the promulgation of this act, any person
desiring to begin to discharge wastes into state waters must
get a permit to do so. Any person who is continuing to dis-
charge wastes after the promulgation date shall be ordered
to abate such pollution. The Commissioner may also order
municipalities, singly, or in groups if necessary, to abate
such pollution or formulate and implement a plan to do so.
The Commissioner can issue orders to any polluter
to cease his activity and/or to formulate a plan of abatement.
If the violation continues, the Commissioner can request the
Attorney General to seek a restraining injunction in the
Connecticut Courts. Knowing violations of the Act are punish-
able by civil fine-each day's offense constitutes a separate
violation.
Any person aggreived by an order to abate pollution
can request a hearing before the Commissioner after which,
when there is a final determination by the Commissioner, an
N-5
-------
appeal can be taken to the Connecticut Courts based solely
on the record of the hearing.
Commissioner is designated as the officer of
the state to manage and control all funds allocated to this
Act by the State Legislature or by State Bonds. He also is
responsible to apply for and administer any funds received
from the Federal Government. The state is empowered to float
$250 million in bonds to assist municipalities in building or
improving various pollution control facilities. There are
special sections dealing with handling and transportion of
oil and liquid chemicals; for cleaning up spills, licensing
such facilities, and inspecting equipment. The section also
provides that fees be paid for engaging in these activities.
Operation without a license is punishable by fine. Any
spillage must be reported and failure to do so is punishable
by fine. The company or person responsible for such spillage
must cover all costs of cleanup and can be sued in Connecticut
Courts if he refuses.
N-6
-------
State: Delaware
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Water and Air Resources
Title 7, Part VII, Chapter 60
2. Delaware River Basin Commission Regulations
Water Quality
Comments:
Controlled by Delaware Air and Water Resources Commission
Secretary of Natural Resources and Environmental Control is head
administrative officer.
Whenever Secretary determines a person is in violation, he
shall first seek voluntary compliance. If this fails he gives
written notice to appear before Secretary in a public hearing at
which such person can give his own testimony as well as that of any
other person. A verbatim transcript is to be made and filed along
with the Secretary's findings and conclusions.
A public hearing is to be held on every application with
respect to permits, leases or grants of a "commercial" type. Such
a hearing is optional for "individual" types.
Any person whose interest is substantially offended by an
action or order of the Secretary can appeal to the Commission. A
hearing will be held by the Commission and a verbatim transcript
made. On the basis of the record of the hearing and that of the
one before the Secretary, the Commission shall make written find-
ings and conclusion which will be its order.
N-7
-------
The Commission may adopt reasonable regulations after a
public hearing, with transcript, at which any affected party may
appear and give evidence.
Any persons substantially affected by an action or order
of the Commission by filing a notice of appeal with it. Such
appeals will be entered before the Superior Court of the county
where the circumstances occurred. The resulting suit will be heard
in law and equity.
Violations of rules, regulations or order of the Commission,
willfully or by neglect is punishable by fine. After notice of
violation has been given, each day of continued violation constitutes
a separate offense.
The Commission is specifically charged with controlling
existing pollution and preventing new pollution in state waters.
It may issue general orders and adopt rules and regulations
concerning the installation or use of pollution control facilities
and other means of controlling pollution.
The Department of Natural Resources exercises general super-
vision of all- enforcement of laws relating to water pollution. It
also is charged with studying and investigating pollution problems
and means of control and making recommendations. It can issue
special orders, after appropriate hearings, directing individuals,
corporations, or municipalities or other political subdivisions to
secure such operating results in the control of pollution as may
be reasonable at the time. It can enter into arrangements with
other states or the Federal Government as to means to control pollu-
tion and issue appropriate general and special orders to implement
such plans.
If measures to correct violations of rules or regulations
N-8
-------
of the Commission are not taken, it may seek Injunctive relief in
addition to fines. If the conditions require immediate action to
protect public health the Commission may require immediate action.
All plans for construction or alteration of sewerage
systems must be approved by the Department before construction is
begun.
Riparian rights now existing are not affected by this
chapter.
N-9
-------
State: Florida
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Florida Air and Water Pollution Control
Act, Chapter 40 3, Florida Statutes
2. Florida Sewage Disposal Facilities Law,
Florida Laws of 1971, Chapter 71-259
effective July 1, 1971
3. Florida Oil Spill Prevention and Pollution
Control Act, Laws of 1970, Chapter 70-244
4. Florida Rules on Pollution of Waters,
Chapter 17-3, Rules of the Florida De-
partment of Air and Water Pollution
Control
5. Florida Rules on Sewage Works, Chapter 17-6,
Rules of the Department of Air and Water
Pollution Control.
Comments:
The Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act
established a commission composed of six members, including
the govenor. Under this commission, and appointed by the
govenor, is a group of five citizens called the pollution
control board. The pollution control board is the head of
the Department of Pollution Control. This department is
responsible for establishing rules and regulations relating
to water pollution. In pursuance of its general duty to pre-
N 10
-------
vent the pollution of Florida's waters, the department
requires permits for any installation which may be a source
of water pollution and supervises underground waters, lakes,
rivers, streams, canals, ditches and coastal waters.
Enforcement of the department's orders is
accomplished first by giving notice of any violation, thereby
affording a hearing and finally if the violation persists, by
directing the state's attorney to begin prosecution proceedings.
Penalties that can be imposed include fines of not more than
$1,000 per day plus, for individuals only, imprisonment for
not more than 60 days.
The Florida Oil Spill Prevention and Pollution
Control Act is an Act giving the Department of Natural Re-
sources control over the curbing of water pollution through
petroleum products. The Department thus.imposes rules and
regulations upon ocean vessels and industries likely to
pollute. Upon discovering a violation of its regulations,
the Department may order the polluter to remedy the effects
of his actions and a penalty of up to $50,000 per day may
be imposed.
N-ll
-------
State: Georgia
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Georgia Water Quality Control Act-
Georgia Code Ch. 17-5 and Ch. 88-26
Amended in 1971.
Comments:
A division for water quality control is created
within the Department of Public Health and a Water Quality
Control Board is established. The intent is to provide
administrative facilities and proceed to establish and main-
tain a water quality control program to foster water purity
and require reasonable treatment of sewage and wastes before
discharge into Georgia waters. The Board is granted dis-
cretionary administration authority to implement these goals.
The Board is empowered to cooperate with Federal
and other state agencies. It is charged with overseeing
of the administration of the Act. It is to survey the state
waters to determine existing conditions and develop a compre-
hensive plan to stop further pollution and reduce existing
pollution consistent with feasible technology. It can adopt
necessary regulations and establish reasonable standards of
water purity and issue orders against persons to sever
N-12
-------
operational results within a specified time to control or
abate pollution.
The chief administrative officer is the Executive
Secretary.
Sewage and wastes cannot be discharged into state
waters without conformity to state regulations. No one can
install or modify systems for waste disposal or alter
the strength of volume currently allowed discharged without
a permit granted by the Board.
When the Board determines pollution exists it is
ordered to supply the polluting with technical information
about means to reduce or control it, but primary responsibility
lies with the persons controlling the discharge. Whenever
such persons refuse to cooperate, the Board can issue an order.
If a person is aggreived by action of order of the
Board he can demand a hearing pursuant to Georgia Administra-
tion procedure. When all administrative remedies are exhausted,
he is entitled to judicial review in accordance with Georgia
procedure.
Final rules of the Board h^ve the authority of
lawsuits decided by the State Courts.
The Board can investigate apparent violations, and
enter public or private pioperty at any reasonable time, and,
N-13
-------
after public hearing institute any proper legal proceeding
to collect violations. The Board can invoke emergency orders
which take effect immediately when received. It can seek
injunction relief, including prospective relief, to restrain
persons from violating the Act.
Intentional or negligent discharge of sewage of
waste causes civil liability for all costs and damages caused
to the State and private parties, including clean-up costs.
Willful violation or negligent failure to comply
with final orders of the courts is a misdemeanor and also
causes liability for penalties.
The Board is empowered to grant funds to
municipal!ties, where available, to assist them in constructing
pollution control facilities. These grants sh^ll seek to make
minimum use of Federal funds but are in no way restricting to
them.
N-14
-------
State: Hawaii
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations Xeroxed:
1. Hawaii Water Pollution Control Laws
Title 7, Chapter H6, Revised Laws of Hawaii
Comments:
The water pollution law is administered by a Board of
Health responsible for all health matters. It can disburse all
moneys appropriated for health purposes. It has agents and in-
spectors to carry all relevant laws and ordinances into effect.
To the extent that the sanitary or physical condition of
waters affects the public health, safety or welfare, the Board can
control all waters, sewerage and waste disposal and water supplies.
No person can establish, extend or alter a sewerage of
waste disposal system without written Board approval.
The Board can adopt rules and regulations for the exercise
of its powers. There is no statutory provision concerning powers
and penalties and civil liabilities.
N-15
-------
State: Illinois
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Illinois Environmental Protection Act
House Bill 3788 (1970)
Comments:
Illinois Environmental Protection Act establishes Environ-
mental Protection Agency and a Pollution Control Board. The agency
is charged with collection and monitoring for all data necessary
to enforcement of the Act. It is required to investigate all vio-
lations and prepare a case to be brought before the Board.
The Agency is authorized to administer any permit or cer-
tification systems established under the Act; to require submission
of plans and other data before acting, to require reports of viola-
tions or potential violations, and to prescribe reasonable permit
fees.
The Agency is authorized to accept and administer grants or
bans received from any source. It is the official state agency for all
purposes of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
The Board shall determine and adopt environmental control
standards for the state and necessary rules and regulations. It
is authorized to conduct hearings on complaints of violations, peti-
tions for variances, and petitions for review of Agency denial to
issue permits.
N-16
-------
No person may discharge, pollutants into state waters In
violation of the Act. Construction or operation of any facility
capable of causing pollution, or designed to reduce pollution is
forbidden without a permit.
Increase of quantity or strength of discharges is forbidden
without permit. Sale or use of any article in a region where the
Board has forbidden its sale is forbidden.
The Board can formulate standards and criteria pursuant to
these control procedures. Such regulations shall take into account
technical feasibility and economic reasonableness. No regulations
shall be adopted, amended or repealed before a public hearing is
held at which any person may appear.
Any person adversely affected by a rule or regulation of
the Board may obtain review of its validity.
The Agency or private parties shall serve a complaint
against any persons who are deemed to be violating the Act. Such
person shall appear at a hearing before the Board pursuant to the
alleged violation. After all testimony is taken, the Board shall
issue such final order as it shall deem appropriate.
The Agency is authorized to issue all permits under rules
adopted by the Board. If the Agency refuses to issue a permit, the
applicant may petition the Board for a hearing.
Any persons who filed a complaint in which hearing was denied,
vitio has been denied a variance or permit, or has been adversely
affected in any final action of the Board may obtain Judicial review
by filing a petition for review in the Appellate Court of the dis-
trict the cause of action arose.
N-17
-------
Violation of the Act may be punished by civil fine —
each day of continued violation constitutes a separate offense.
Such violators may also be enjoined from continuing the violation.
The Attorney General shall bring the action.
Knowing violation of the Act, or submission of false reports,
is a misdemeanor.
N-18
-------
State: Indiana
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. INDIANA STREAM POLLUTION CONTROL LAW - (Chapter
214, Acts of 1943; Amended by Chapter 132, Acts
of 1945; Amended by Chapter 64, Acts of 1957).
2. INDIANA WATER QUALITY STANDARDS - (Regulation
SPC 1R-2, Water Quality Standards for Waters of
Indiana, adopted March 17, 1970, effective September
18, 1970; SPC 2, effective January 10, 1953; SPC 3,
effective December 9, 1963; SPC 11, effective March
3, 1971; SPC 13, effective, April 1, 1972).
Comments:
The Indiana Stream Pollution Control Law created an
administrative board known as the Stream Pollution Control
Board of Indiana. This board is composed of seven members
whose duty is to control, abate and prevent the pollution
of the waters of the State. As such, the Control Board has
the authority to promulgate appropriate rules and regulations
and the power to bring an action in law or in equity in the
name of the State in order to enforce the provisions of the
Control Law and its own regulations.
N-19
-------
State: Louisiana
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. LOUISIANA STREAM CONTROL COMMISSION ACTS,
Chapter 3, Title 56 (19^0 as amended).
2. LOUISIANA LAW ON POLLUTING THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
(Acts 1970, No. 499; House Bill No. 335).
3. LOUISIANA REGULATION ON REPORTS OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE
DISCHARGES (Adopted Under Authority of Section
1^35, Chapter 3, Part I, of Title 56, Louisiana
Revised Statutes of 1950, August 1, 1951).
4. LOUISIANA RULES RELATING TO OIL AND GAS (Adopted
Under Authority of Section 1^35, Chapter 3,
Part I, of Title 56, Louisiana Revised Statutes
of 1950).
Comments:
Section 1431 of the Louisiana Stream Control Commission Acts
provides for the creation of a Stream Control Commission. This
Commission has authority to regulate the flow of waste disposal,
public and private, into any of the waters, or tributaries of such
waters, in the state. The Commission accomplishes this through the
promulgation of rules and regulations, and the conducting of inves-
tigations .
The Commission must establish pollution standards for the
state's waters in relation to their intended public use. Also, the
Commission is authorized to make the certification which applicants
for Federal licenses or permits are required to provide to a Federal
agency under Section 21 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
N-20
-------
Whenever the Commission believes that its rules and regulations are
being violated, it will send notice to the alleged violator. Any
person who feels aggrieved by any order of the Commission may peti-
tion for a hearing with the Commission Itself.
Violations of the Commission's orders are enforced and pro-
secuted by the Attorney General. The penalties that may be exacted
are not less than $100 nor more than $2,000, and costs of prosecu-
tion, or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both. Each
day in which a violation continues is a separate and additional
offense.
The Louisiana Law on Polluting the Mississippi River pro-
hibits the discharge of untreated wastes into the river. The State
Board of Health is the agency responaible for overseeing compliance.
If violations occur, a complaint may be filed in the district
court, seeking an injunction against the violator. A penalty of not
more than $10,000 each day of violation may be Imposed.
N-21
-------
State: Maine
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. MAINE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAW, Main Statutes,
Title 38, Chapter 3, Protection and Improvement
of Waters.
2. MAINE OIL DISCHARGE PREVENTION AND POLLUTION CONTROL
ACT, Chapter 572, Public Laws of 1970, Revised
Statutes, Title 38, Chapter 3, Subchapter II-A.
Comments:
The Maine Water Pollution Control Act established the
Water and Air Environmental Improvement Commission. The purpose
of this Commission is to "control, abate and prevent the pollution
of the air, waters, and coastal flats" through utilization of the
state police power. The Commission is delegated the duty and
authority to make recommendations to the Legislature in respect
to classification of state waters, to consult and advise munici-
palities, persons and businesses concerning proper disposal of sew-
age and industrial wastes, and, subsequent to public hearings, to
adopt, amend and repeal appropriate regulations designed to effec-
tuate state pollution controls. The Commission is the state agency
responsible for accepting Federal funds and cooperating with the
Federal Government in relation to water pollution control.
All orders and regulations of the Commission are enforced
by the Attorney General. He may commence an action in the Superior
Court of the county in which the violation of the Commission order
occurred. The Attorney General may institute injunction proceedings
N-22
-------
or appropriate civil and criminal actions. The fine for failure to
obey a Commission order shall be not less than $200 nor more than
$1,000 for each day of such violation.
Any person aggrieved by a Commission order may, within
30 days of such order, appeal to the appropriate Superior Court.
The Maine Oil Discharge and Pollution Control Act grants the
aforementioned Commission the authority to exercise the state's
police power in an effort to curb water pollution from petroleum
products. As such, the Commission may adopt necessary regulations
and rules to effectuate the policies enumerated in this Control
£Ct. Enforcement is accomplished in the same manner as specified
the previous section. However, violation of a Commission order
subject to a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $5,000 per
day.
N-23
-------
State: Maryland
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Maryland water pollution control laws, annotated
Code of Maryland, Article 43 - Health, Sections
387 through 4o6A.
2. Maryland water resources law, Article 96A, anno-
tated Code of Maryland.
3. Maryland Environmental Service Act of 1970.
Comments:
The Maryland Water Pollution Control Laws designate
the State Board of Health as the agency responsible for super-
vision of the waters of the State so as to protect the public
health and welfare. Thus, the Board of Health determines the
rules and regulations applicable to pollution standards. It
may issue orders to manufacturing or industrial establishments
directing them to cease their polluting activities. It may
also, when requested, advise municipalities, corporations and
other persons as to the most acceptable method of refuse and
sewage disposal so as to maintain the purity of the water
supply. Furthermore, In order to alter any existing sewage
disposal system all municipalities or other governmental bodies
must first obtain a permit from the State Board of Health.
N-24
-------
The penalty for failure to comply with directives of
the State Board of Health is forfeiture, to the State of Mary-
land, of not less than ten nor more than five hundred dollars.
For each extra day in which the order is not complied with,
an additional fine of not less than five nor more than fifty
dollars is imposed.
Any individual or entity dissatisfied with an order of
the the State Board of Health may, within 10 days of service of
such order, commence an action in the circuit court of any
county or before any judge of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore
City to have such directive vacated.
The Maryland Water Resources Law established the State
Department of Water Resources in order for it to assume responsi-
bility over water resources planning and construction. This
department is headed by a five member commission. The depart-
ment makes or causes to be made"surveys, maps, investigations
and studies of the water resources of the State as it may deem
necessary to provide it with sufficient information to formulate
a program".
The department's regulations may be enforced by
injunction and/or fines by the circuit court of any county.
The maximum fine is $1,000 but there is also a possible penalty
of imprisonment for not more than one year.
N-25
-------
The Maryland Environmental Service Act of 1970 created
the Maryland Environmental Service. This Service is an agency
within the department of Natural Resources. The purpose of this
agency is to provide Statewide waste purification and disposal
services. The Service is empowered to issue revenue bonds to
finance its projects.
The Service is authorized to have consultants to
make studies, plans, surveys or investigations relating to
waste transportationj purification, disposal techniques and
management methods.
N-26
-------
State: Massachusetts
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. MASSACHUSETTS CLEAN WATERS ACT - (Chapter 21
of the General Laws as amended by Chapter
685 of the Acts of 1966, Chapter 873 of the
Acts of 1967, Chapters 611 and 64 8 of the
Acts of 1968, Chapters 745 and 823 of the
Acts of 1969, and Chapters 28, 150, 692,
693, 704, and 827 of the Acts of 1970).
Comments
2. MASSACHUSETTS INDUSTRIAL WATER POLLUTION
CONTROL LOAN ACT - (Chapter 746, Act of 1970).
3. MASSACHUSETTS RULES FOR ADOPTING ADMINISTRA-
TIVE REGULATIONS, RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF
ADJUDICATORY PROCEEDINGS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE
RULES - (Filed with the Secretary of State
October 28, 1968).
4. MASSACHUSETTS RULES FOR THE PREVENTION AND
CONTROL OF OIL POLLUTION•IN THE WATERS OF
THE COMMONWEALTH - (Filed with the Secretary
of State June 10, 1969).
5. MASSACHUSETTS WATER QUALITY STANDARDS -
(Adopted by the Massachusetts Division of
Water Pollution Control on March 3, 1967,
in accordance with the provisions of Section
27 (4) of Chapter 21 of the General Laws,
and in accordance with the procedure required
by Chapter 30A of the General Laws; filed
with the Secretary of State March 6, 1967).
The Massachusetts Clean Waters Act established a
division of water pollution control subject to the authority
of the Water Resources Commission, which in turn is a sub-
N-27
-------
division of the Department of Natural Resources. The responsi-
bility of the Water Pollution Control Division is to improve
the quality of water resources and "to establish a program
for the prevention, control and abatement of water pollution."
The division must cooperate with various political agencies
and agencies of other states. In so doing, it is to be the
agency responsible for accepting and dispensing any funds made
available for the fight against water pollution.
The division is also authorized, with the approval
of the Water Resources Commission, to design and propose
water pollution abatement districts within the state. These
abatement districts have their own commissions and are respon-
sible for presenting plans for control of water pollution to
the division. Thus, water pollution control is accomplished
at the local level.
All rules, regulations, and determinations by the
division are subject to judicial review. The Superior Court
has jurisdiction in equity to enforce all of these rules and
regulations issued by the division. Anyone who violates an
order of the division and thereby increases the level of
water pollution is subject to a fine of not more than $1000
for each day such violation continues.
The purpose of the Massachusetts Industrial Water
Pollution Control Loan Act is to provide the Department of
Commerce and Development with the authority to make loans
to various businesses, in order that they might construct
proper waste treatment facilities, and thus abate pollution.
N-28
-------
State: Michigan
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Michigan Water Pollution Control Law, Act 245,
Public Acts of 1929, as amended.
2. Michigan Liquid Industrial Waste Disposal Act,
Act 136, Public Acts of 1969, as amended.
3. Michigan Watercraft Pollution Control Act, Act 167,
Public Acts of 1970, as amended.
4. Michigan Rules and Procedure, Adopted by the
Michigan Water Resources Commission 1962.
5. Michigan Water Quality Standards for Intrastate
Waters, Proposed by the Michigan Water Resources
Commission, 1968.
Comments:
The Michigan Water Pollution Control Law creates a Water
Resources Commission to protect and conserve state waters by con-
trolling waterways, instituting rules and regulations, conducting
studies and surveys, consulting with the legislature, and enforc-
ing the Act. (§2) The Commission controls all discharges into and
alterations of state waterways. (§22). Jurisdiction is in all appro-
priate courts. Attorney General prosecutes criminal violations.
(§3). Express right to enter all public and private lands to in-
spect and investigate violations or to analyze pollution or obstruc-
tions. (§4). No discharge or land fill may occur without a permit,
(§§52-6). Annual surveillance fees are to be paid to provide for
N-29
-------
monitoring. (§13).
The remaining Acts and Regulations are specialized legisla-
tion aimed at particular problem areas.
N-30
-------
State: Minnesota
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Minnesota Water Pollution Control Laws, (Water Pollu-
tion Control Excerpts from Minnesota Statutes of 1969,
Chapters 115 and 116, as Amended by Laws of 1971* Chap-
ters 20, 887 and 896).
2. Minnesota Oil Storage Regulations (WPC 4, Regulation
Relating to Storage or Keeping of Oil and Other Liquid
Substances Capable of Polluting Waters of the State;
Adopted June 26, 1964).
3. Minnesota Criteria for Intrastate Waters (WPC 14, Cri-
teria for the Classification of the Intrastate Waters
of the State and the Establishment of Standards of
Quality and Purity; Adopted June 5, 1967).
4. Minnesota Criteria for Interstate Waters (WPC 15, Cri-
teria for the Classification of the Interstate Waters
of the State and the Establishment of Standards and
Quality and Purity, adopted June 30, 1969).
5. Minnesota Effluent Standards (WPC 23, Standards of
Quality and Purity for Effluents Discharged to Intra-
state Waters; adopted April 15, 1969).
6. Minnesota Classifications of Interstate Waters (WPC 25,
Classifications of Interstate Waters of Minnesota,
adopted February 4, 1971-
Comments:
The Minnesota Water Pollution Control Laws give the Pollution
Control Agency the responsibility to prevent the pollution of the
waters of the State. In order to carry out this duty the Agency
has the power, among others, to prescribe rules and regulations,
to require permits for the discharge of waste and sewage, to
require submission of disposal system plans and to conduct investi-
gations and hearings in regard to possible violations.
In order to effect local regulation of water pollution, the
Control Laws also created the Water Pollution Control Advisory
Committee in Section 115.17. This Committee is composed of two
members from each region of the state. Their duties are to assist
the agency in the performance of its functions and to act as liason
between the agency and'the public.
Section 115.19 provides for the creation of sanitary dis-
tricts within the state for the purpose of promoting the public
health. This system again emphasizes the amount of local control
employed by the State in the fight against pollution.
N-31
-------
Enforcement of the dictates of the agency and the provisions
of this Act are accomplished ultimately through court actions brought
by the District Attorney.
The Control Laws Act encourages the agency to cooperate with
Canada, other U.S. States and the various municipalities within
Minnesota. Also, the agency is to accept funds made available by
various sources, particularly the Federal Government, for control-
ling pollution.
There is also a state water pollution control fund which is
used for the local and state-wide effort against pollution.
The Minnesota Oil Storage Regulations were enacted to require
minimum safeguards against leakages of oil substances stored within
the state.
N-32
-------
State: Mississippi
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Mississippi Code of 1942 §7106 111-136
Mississippi Laws of 1966 - Ch. 258
Comments:
Controlled by Miss. Air and Water Pollution
Control Commission. The head administrative officer is the
Executive Secretary who is appointed by the Commissioner.
All authority of the Commission except promulgation of rules
and standards, the issuance of orders and the revocation of
permits can be delegated to the Secretary.
Commission is empowered to: (1) generally super-
vise administration and enforcement of this act and orders,
regulations and rules issued thereunder. (2) develop com-
prehensive control plans for control and abatement of exist-
ing and new pollution. (3) advise and consult with all other
agencies, groups and industries on the pollution problem.
(4) administer grants and loans from all sources. (5) adopt,
modify or repeal standards of water quality and orders, rules
and regulations pertaining to such standards. (6) to control
N-33
-------
or abate discharge of pollutants into state waters by
permit and to require permits for installation, modification
or operation of disposal systems.
Before adopting, amending or repealing water
quality standard, the Commission is required to hold public
hearings. Whenever the Commission believes a violation under
the Act has occurred, it may issue a written complaint. Such
complaint becomes effective unless the alleged violator de-
mands a hearing. When such a hearing is held, the Commission
shall make findings and conclusions on the record and enter
such order as it feels best furthers the law. Any person who
is denied a permit or has a permit revoked or modified can
demand such a hearing. Any interested person can demand a
hearing.
The Commission shall inspect discharge facilities.
Persons, corporations or municipalities discharging pollutants
into state waters shall keep such records as the Commission
may require and pay a fee for the inspections.
Violations of the Act, or written orders of the
Commission are punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.
Additionally, injuncture remedies may be had. Each day during
which a violation occurs shall be deemed a separate offense.
Any person aggrieved by act or order of the
N-34
-------
Commission can request a hearing at which he can present all
evidence and witnesses. Following a final order by the
Commission, the aggrieved party can appeal to the Chancery
Court upon filing of a surety bond for costs. The appeal
will be considered solely upon the record of the hearings.
Further appeal may be had from the Chancery Court to the
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
N-35
-------
State: New Hampshire
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Water Pollution Control Law,
Chapter 159
Comments:
Control agency - Water Supply and Pollution Control
Commission. Chief administrative officer, appointed by the
Commission, is the Executive Director. He shall appoint various
subordinates.
The statute specifies for grades of water quality to be
applied to all state waters. It also specifies minimum treatment
for sewage and industrial wastes.
The policy of the Act is to obtain primary treatment of all
wastes, and as far as possible, secondary treatment of wastes, to
satisfy the classification criteria of each body of water.
The Commission is empowered:
1. To supervise all administrative and enforce-
ment under this Act.
2. To study and investigate all problems con-
nected with water pollution.
3. To cooperate with all other interested
agencies.
4. To investigate and approve applications for
state and Federal aid.
N-36
-------
5. To set standards of design and construction
for all sewage and waste treatment facilities; to
approve all applications and plans and undertake neces-
sary inspections.
6. To formulate long-term policy for water purity
and to undertake necessary inspection and analysis toward
this end.
a. Commission may accept any assistance
as may be proferred by persons that the Commission
deems to be qualified.
State empowered to guarantee payment of notes issued by
public agencies to finance construction of pollution control
facilities up to $75,000,000. All facilities built by any person
are tax-exempt for that portion of the facility determined by the
Commission to be effective in pollution control.
The classification of waters shall be adopted by the legis-
lature after public hearings by the Commission. Persons aggrieved
may appeal to the State courts for variances.
No one can begin to discharge waste into state waters with-
out a permit. No one can alter or expand existing discharges with
out permit. Any person who places litter on the banks of state
waters and will not comply with an order to remove it, can be
forced to pay the costs of a contract to clear it up entered into
by the Commission.
Violations of law or any regulations thereunder may be
enjoined by state court. Orders of Commission are subject to
normal New Hampshire review and appeal procedures.
N-37
-------
Violations of Act are punishable by civil fine. Each day-
constitutes a separate violation.
N-38
-------
State: New York
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. The New York Environmental Conservation Law
(Chapter 140, Laws of New York, 1970);
2. The New York VJater Pollution Control Law
administered by the Division of Pure Waters,
State Department of Health, 84 Almond Avenue,
Albany, New York 12202;
3. The New York Classification and Standards per-
taining to Parts 700 through 703, Title 6,
Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regu-
lations i
4. A statement of the New York criteria governing
thermal discharges (Part 704 of Title 6 of the
Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regu-
lations of the State of New York); and
5. The New York Rules on Permits (10 N.Y.C.R.R. 73,
Approval of Plans and Issuance of Permits for
New or Modified Disposal System and Form of
Environmental Feasibility Report).
Comments:
1. The New York Environmental Conservation Law
(Chapter 140, Laws of New York., 17Q) . Article. IX, Section 11
establishes the Department of Environmental Conservation headed
by a Commissioner. Article II, Section 14, Subsections 1
through 24, establish the powers, functions and responsibilities
of that Department which include, among other things, the coor-
dination and development of policies, plans and programs
N-39
-------
related to the environment of the state, the promotion and coor-
dination of the balanced utili2ation of state resources, the
prevention and abatement of all water, land and air pollution,
the encouragement of scientific investigation and research on
ecological processes, and a monitoring of the environment to
afford more effective and efficient control practices. I must
note that this new Department has been delegated responsibility
and authority previously assigned to the Health Department, the
Air Pollution Control Board, and the Pesticide Control Board, at
least with respect to matters pertaining to or connected with
sewage service, drainage of sewers, water pollution control, air
pollution control, planning for collection, treatment and dis-
posal of refuse, and recommendations for controlling the use,
transportation, storage and disposal of refuse, and recommenda-
tions for controlling the use, transportation, storage and dis-
posal of marine pollutant items.
2. The New York Water Pollution Control Law. The
Division of Pure Waters, as created by this legislation, is
designated the responsibility of studying, conducting public
hearings upon, and designating standards of quality and purity
for the various classifications of water used within the state.
To this extent, the Department has the authority and the responsi-
bility of issuing permits for the use of state waterways and of
conducting or causing to be conducted studies and research with
respect to pollution abatement and control problems, disposal
N-40
-------
systems and treatment of sewage, industrial waste and other
related activities. Pursuant to statutory authority, this
Department promulgates rules and regulations known as the
"Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the
State of New York." These rules and regulations, after hav-
ing been filed with the Secretary of State, are binding upon
those persons and companies who wish to use the State water-
ways .
N-41
-------
State: New Jersey
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Act
(Chapter 33, Mew Jersey Laws of 1970).
2. New Jersey Water Pollution Law (Title 58 New Jersey
Revised Statutes).
3. New Jersey Water Quality Improvement Act of 1971
(Chapter 173, Public Laws of 1971).
New Jersey Clean Oceans Act (Chapter 177, Public
Laws of 1971).
5. New Jersey Wetlands Act of 1970 (Public Laws,
Chapter 272).
6. New Jersey Water Quality Standards filed August 10,
1964 and amended.
Comments:
The Act reconstitutes the Department of Conservation and
Economic Development as the Department of Environmental Protection.
All the duties of the old department are continued in the new one
additionally many environmental functions previously handled by
other agencies, and many councils and boards handling specific
matters were planned under the Department. Most significantly, all
functions dealing with air and water pollution formally administered
by the Department of Health, including the licensing of water and
sewage plants, were transferred.
The Department is charged with formulating comprehensive
plans for conservation, promotion of environmental protection and
N-42
-------
prevention of pollution.
It is authorized to:
1. Conduct research programs about cause and
effects of pollution.
2. Receive or initiate complaints of pollu-
tion, hold hearings and Institute legal proceedings
for fines or injunctive relief when necessary.
3. Administer or supervise programs of en-
vironmental protection, and prescribe minimum
qualifications of all persons engaged in official
environmental protection -work.
H. Supervise sanitary engineering facilities
and make and enforce rules and regulations to be
approved with reference to any project before con-
struction commences, and to inspect all projects
during construction and enforce compliance with
approved plans.
5. Endorse state pollution laws, rules and
regulations.
6. Cooperate with all other agencies and public
or private sources, and receive and administer funds
for any objects of the Act.
NEW JERSEY WATER POLLUTION LAWS
Prohibit discharge of various classes of industrial Waste
and sewage into state waters punishable by fine after notice given
by state department of environment, local board of health, or any
corporation supplying drinking water whose supply will be affected.
Each week is a separate offense.
N-43
-------
State Department of Health originally had general supervi-
sory authority over water purity. It could seek injunctive relief,
with or without civil penalty. Local health board had similar
power.
Sewage treatment plants, approved by Department, can dis-
charge certain effluents into state waters.
Any factory established within a defined "watershed" must
receive a permit from Department unless it demonstrates it will
be adequately served by municipal sewage facilities.
The Act contains specific chapters relating to the
Hackensack and Passaic Rivers.
The Act contains detailed provisions for the licensing and
operation of sewage treatment facilities and for the establishment,
control and funding of sewage districts.
All provisions generally provide for various fines and
injunctive relief.
Water Quality Improvement Act. Prohibits discharge of
petroleum products and debris, or hazardous substances into state waters
Any person so doing is responsible to clean up and report to Depart-
ment of Environmental Protection — failure to report punishable
by fine. Refusal to clean up can result in Department appointment
of a third person; affected by the discharge, to expend money to
clean It up. Pollutor can be ordered to pay costs of third party
and the Department, in addition to his own costs (up to $14,000,000).
Knowing discharge or willful neglect results In liability for full
extent of damage.
Department can get injunctive relief and court orders
N-44
-------
for payment of any moneys expended by the Department or third
parties.
CLEAN OCEAN ACT
Department of Environmental Protection empowered to formu-
late regulations controlling the loading of vessels within the
state with materials which, it dumped at sea, would have an adverse
effect on state waters. Such activities may be required to be
performed only under permit.
Department may seek injunctive relief against violations
of the Act or rules and regulations thereunder. Civil fines may
also be levied. Each day of continuing violation constitutes a
separate offense.
N-45
-------
State: North Carolina
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. North Carolina Water and Air Resources Act, Chapter 143,
Article 21, General Statutes of North Carolina (1967,
as amended).
2. North Carolina Rules, Regulations, Classifications
and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface
Waters, adopted October 1970 pursuant to authority
vested under Article 21, Chapter 143, General Statutes
of North Carolina (1967, as amended).
Comments:
1. The Board of Water and Air Resources is established
(§143-211) which has as a subdivision the Department
of Water and Air Resources. The Board is vested with
the obligation to develop and adopt a water classifica-
tion system, to survey the waters of the State, and to
classify the waters (§143-214.1). There is specific
power in the Board to regulate water use by a permit
system (§14 3-215.1). Appeals from a denial of a permit
are pursuant to §143-215.4. The Board may require the
installation of disposal systems under threat of permit
cancellation. (§143-215.3). Additional power in
Board to conduct investigations. Jurisdiction vested
in the Board to initiate action in any superior court
in which the defendant resides or has a principal place
of business. (§14 3-215-3(5)). The Board may declare
a public emergency and, with the concurrence of the
Governor, compell discontinuance of the discharge of
the contaminant. (§143-215.3(12)). Penalties for
violation of special orders issued by Board or failure
to perform statutory obligations is a misdemeanor with
a fine of $100 - $1,000 per violation. (§143-215.6).
Apparent concurrent jurisdiction with the State Board
of Health with respect to sanitary disposal of sewage
and public water supplies (§143-215.7) and the local health
boards. Injunctive relief may be sought by the Board.
(§14 3-215.8). The Act terminates the Board of Water
Resources vesting its responsibilities, particularly
contractual obligations in the Board. (§143-215-10).
N-46
-------
State: Ohio
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Ohio Water Pollution Control Act
§6111.01
Comments:
Water Control Board established in the Department of Health.
Director of Department of Health can exercise all powers of Board
except adoption of rules and regulations, revocation of permits,
issuance or modification of orders, and issuance or revocation of
industrial pollution control certificates.
The Board is empowered to develop programs for pollution
control including the adoption of water quality standards.
It can cooperate with all interested agencies and private
•groups and administer all grants, public or private.
It is empowered to conduct and encourage investigation and
research on pollution and collect relevant data.
It can issue orders prohibiting or abating discharges, re-
quiring construction of disposal systems and prohibiting extension
of existing systems taking into account economic and technological
parameters. It can review any plans or other data relating to such
systems.
It can issue permits for discharge of wastes into state
waters under certain controlling conditions and issue water pollu-
tion control certificates.
N-47
-------
All discharge of pollution without permit is prohibited
except discharges from facilities controlled by political subdivi-
sions of the state. To facilitate this control, the Board is
charged with formulating standards of water quality for the various
state waters.
Board may initiate investigations, and enter any property
at reasonable times, of alleged pollution. On the complaint of any
political subdivision, or petition of 25 voters, however, such an
investigation is mandatory.
All proceedings, including rule-making, and issuance of
permits, orders and notices subject to Ohio administrative procedure.
The Board cannot refuse to issue, or revoke or modify, a permit
without a prior hearing.
The attorney general, at the request of the Board can go
to court to seek fines for violations or injunctive relief for vio-
lation after conviction constitutes a separate offense.
Any facility qualifying as a water pollution control facility,
upon issuance-of a certificate by the Board, is exempt from various
state taxes. The Board retains power to revoke such certificates
after hearing. Any party aggrieved by actions of the Board in this
area can appeal to the state courts.
N-48
-------
State: Pennsylvania
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Summary of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources Law (1971).
2. Pennsylvania Clean Streams Laws, P.L. 222 (1937» as
amended).
3. Pennsylvania Sanitary Water Board Rules and Regulations
(amended as of 1970).
Comments:
The law provided for consolidation of various agencies and
departments into a single body charged with the establishment of
water standards, control of waterways, promulgation of regulations
and rules, survey and collection of data, and enforcement in accor-
dance with the detailed provisions of the Law. Permits are re-
quired to use waterways. The Department may seek injunctive relief,
conduct hearings, or initate action for damages.
The Environmental Quality Board shall have similar duties and
responsibilities with respect to the development of a master en-
vironmental plan.
An Environmental Hearing Board, a Citizen's Advisory Council,
a Board of Certification and numerous other boards were established
with specific responsibilities.
N-49
-------
Territory:
Puerto Rico
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. PUERTO RICO WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAW -
(Act No. 1^42, approved May 1, 1950).
Comments: The Federal Water Pollution Control Act provides
that in order for a state or territory to avail
itself of the benefits thereof, it must establish
some type of water pollution control agency.
This is the purpose of the Puerto Rician Water
Pollution Control Law. It grants the Commissioner
of the Department of Health the authority to con-
trol, prevent and abate water pollution. There
is an advisory board which consults with the
Commissioner in regard to policy objectives.
However, it is the Commissioner who must ultimately
decide pollution standards, promulgate rules and
regulations and enforce all of these. Penalties
for violation of this Act or an order of the
Commissioner include fines of not less than $100
nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment for not
less than ninety days nor more than one year, or
both. Each day's violation consitutes a separate
and distinct offense.
N-50
-------
State:
RHODE ISLAND
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. RHODE ISLAND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LAW -
(General Laws of 1956, Title M6, Chapter
12.)
Comments: This Act makes it the responsibility of the
Director of the Department of Health to estab-
lish pollution standards and to enforce rules
and regulations relating to these standards
in the area of water pollution. The Director
is assisted by an advisory water pollution board
composed of five members.
Violation of any provision of this Act or an
order of the Director are punishable by a fine
of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not
more than thirty days, or both. Each day dur-
ing which a violation continues is considered
a separate offense. All prosecution proceed-
ings for violations are heard in the District
Courts of the State, whereas equity proceedings
are held in Superior Court.
N-51
-------
State:
South Carolina
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. SOUTH CAROLINA POLLUTION CONTROL ACT - (R 1316,
S 555, Laws of 1970).
2. SOUTH CAROLINA CLASSIFICATION STANDARDS -
(Approved Spril 14, 1971).
Comments:
Section 3 of the Act establishes within the State
Department of Health the Pollution Control Authority of
South Carolina, consisting of thirteen members. it is the
responsibility of this Authority to promulgate rules and regu-
lations in order to protect the quality of the State's water.
The Authority is empowered to make orders regulating the dis-
charge of sewage, industrial wastes or other wastes into any
waters of the State. As such, the Authority may issue, deny,
revoke, suspend or modify permits for the discharge of waters
or sewage into the State's waters. The Authority is also
responsible for cooperating with the Federal Government and other
States in joint efforts directed against pollution.
The Authority must conduct public hearings prior to
its classification of the waters of the State or its adoption
of standards of water quality. If any individual feels agrieved
by any order of the Authority, he may appeal the decision within
N-52
-------
thirty days after its issuance. This action may be brought in
the Court of Common Pleas of any county in which the alleged
violation has occurred. The Attorney General is the legal adviser
to the Authority and upon its request he will institute injunc-
tion proceedings whenever appropriate. However, prosecution
proceedings for violations of final orders of the Authority can
be brought only by this body or by the governing body of the
County effected by the alleged violation. Penalties for such
violation include fines of not less than $100 nor more than
$5,000 or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both.
Each day's violation shall constitute a separate offense.
N-53
-------
State: Texas
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Texas Water Quality Act, Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat.
Ann. Art. 26216.-1 (1967, as amended).
2. Texas Water Quality Requirements as Adopted by
the Water Quality Board (1967, as amended).
3. Texas Water Quality Parameters (1969, as revised).
Comments:
The Act is a revision of an earlier legislative attempt
to regulate water quality. Note: the Act specifically preserves
any rights of ownership in underground water. (§1.04) After
validating all prior acts of the Texas Water Pollution Control
Board, the Act renames the Board as the Texas Water Quality
Board. This Board is assigned the responsibility of establish-
ing a water quality sampling and monitoring program with the
cooperation of all other state agencies. (§1.06). The Parks
and Wildlife Department, the State Department of Health, and
the Railroad Commission are acknowledged to possess certain en-
forcement and regulatory powers distinct from those assigned
to the Board. (§§1.08-1.10). However, private rights of action
are also preserved. (§1.11). The Board, to carry out Its re-
sponsibilities, may receive funds from other agencies as well
as gifts and grants from any source. (§2.12). Biennial Reports
are to be submitted to the governor. The Board shall adopt
quality standards, establish rules for discharge, and develop
a plan for control of water quality. (§§3.01, 3.02). Ac-
cordingly, the Board has the authority to enter any public or
private property. (§3.04). Specific authorization to work with
governmental agencies and private organizations. (§§3.07, 3.25)
Through permit allocation the Board governs water use and dis-
charge. Regional and local authorities encouraged to assist
the Board through the establishment of joint programs. (§3.29)
The Board may require monitoring of discharges. (§3-33). En-
forcement powers given to the Board with concurrent jurisdiction
in the local authorities on any other department with jurisdiction.
N-54
-------
State: Virginia
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Virginia State Water Control Law, Chapter 3.1, Title
62.1, Code of Virginia (1950, as amended).
2. Virginia Miscellaneous Laws Relating to Water Pollu-
tion, Chapter 20, Title 62.1, Sections 62.1-195 -
62.1-195, Code of Virginia (1950, as amended by the
19 70 General Assembly).
3. Virginia Regulations and Requirements.
4. Virginia Water Quality Standards.
Comments:
1. The Water Control Act continues the State Water Control
Board as established by the Executive Department of
the State and authorizes the Board to supervise and
control the quality of the water in Virginia, establish
standards of quality, conduct scientific experiments
including methods of maintaining consistency of quality,
issue discharge certificates, investigate violations of
certificates, issue special orders, enforce the Act in
court actions, and establish Regulations. (§62.1-44.15).
Jurisdiction established against private persons, politi-
cal subdivisions and industrial operations. (§62.1-44.15(3).
Particular regulations set by legislature on industrial
establishments, (§62.1-44.16) and sewage discharge (§62.1-
44.18. The Board is specifically empowered to enter pri-
vate and public property for the purpose of obtaining
information or enforcement of the provisions of the Act,
(§62.1-44.20) and may secure injunctive relief (§62.1-
44.23). Hearings and appeals from Board action are
available to aggrieved parties.
2. The Miscellaneous Laws set forth specific criminal pro-
visions for certain actions including garbage disposal,
contamination of State waters and the discharge of oil.
N-55
-------
State: Washington
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Washington Environmental Quality Reorganization
Act of 1970, Senate Bill No. 1, Chapter 62, Laws
of 1970.
2. Washington Water Pollution Control Laws, Chapter
90.48 RCW (1945, as amended).
3. Water Pollution Control Facilities - Financing,
Chapter 90-50 RCW (1967, as amended).
Comments:
The Washington Environmental Quality Reorganization Act
of 1970 Is a massive restructuring of many earlier statutes,
rules and regulations. The Act creates a Department of Ecology
to regulate water, manage and develop programs of water resources,
and to regulate waste disposal (§2). This Department has all the
powers formerly vested in the Water Pollution Control Commission,
the Department of Water Resources, and as created by the Washington
Clean Air Act. The Department is to adopt rules and regulations
(§8). The Director of the Department Is to consult with the Depart-
ment of Health and the State Board of Health (§14) as well as the
federal government and Canadian officials (§15). The Act creates
an Ecological Commission which shall provide "advice and guidance"
to the Department (§17, 19). Multiple agencies and sub-departments
are created by the Act under the auspices of the Department (§26).
A Pollution Control Hearings Board is established to hear appeals
(§31).
The Water Pollution Control Laws, incorporated by the above
discussed Act, set the basic powers and enforcement provisions.
Explicit power is given to establish water standards and to enter
public and private property to Investigate water conditions (90.48,090).
Use of waterways for discharge is by permit only (90.48.080).
Superior courts act as review boards (see above). Injunctions and
actions for violations to be maintained by the Attorney General
(90.48.142). Director authorized, however, to make demand for compen-
sation due on account of violations (90.48.142).
N-56
-------
State: Wisconsin
Statutes, Rules and/or Regulations
1. Water, Ice Sewage & Refuse Ch. 14*4
2. Navigable Waters Protection Law Ch. 144.26
3. Wisconsin Water Quality Standards
Comments:
Department of Resource Development administers the
program. It is supervised on policy matters by a board appointed
by the governor.
The law specifically states that standard for rivers
emptying into the Great Lakes shall be as high as practicable.
The Board is charged with formulating a long range com-
prehensive state water use plan. It is authorized to adopt rules
setting standards of water quality for various state waters.
It can adopt rules and regulations governing the con-
struction and operation of pollution control facilities. It
can issue general orders to a class of persons. It can issue
special orders to specific parties ordering them to cease
pollution or conform with specificied standards within a certain
time. Regularly there must be a hearing, but emergency orders
are permitted where necessary.
The Department can cooperate with all responsible
authorities of other jurisdictions. It can accept and apply
money and grants from any source.
The Department has power to collect all costs of elimina-
ting pollution, and its cleanup cost, from noncomplying persons.
The Bill authorizes state advisory board and empowers
Department to divide state into regions each to have a regional
advisory board.
N-57
-------
All septic tank Installations and waste disposal systems
must be approved by the Department.
The Department orders can be enforced by Attorney General.
Any aggrieved person can obtain review of Department action in
accordance with Wisconsin procedure.
The Bill authorizes state aid to municipalities for con-
structing pollution control facilities.
Special planning and regulatory proceedures are enumerated
with regard to zoning ordinances for land near navigable waters,
within the same general proceddural framework. Municipalities
are allowed to promulgate such ordinances.
Enforcement - all orders of the Department are enforce-
able by injunction or civil fine. Each day of violation is a
separate offense. Any interested person can obtain review of a
Department order by filing a petition with the Department setting
forth the desired modifications.Upon receipt, the Department shall
order a public hearing and may thereafter modify or affirm its
original orders. Further judicial review is obtainable through
standard Wisconsin procedure.
The Department can order public hearings on alleged or
potential sources of water pollution upon the verified complaint of 6
or more citizens.
N-58
-------
APPENDIX 0
SAMPLED DATA PROBLEMS
-------
APPENDIX 0
SAMPLED DATA PROBLEMS
According to the well known sampling theorem if a signal has no frequency components
higher than frequency W then 2W samples per second suffice to define the signal exactly
and without error. If, on the other hand, for sampling at 2W, there are any frequency
components at all above W then an "aliasing" error will be incurred. As a direct result
of the sampling process any signal component (sinewave or random) at a frequency f >W
appears in the sampled signal as a component of the same amplitude at the "alias" fre-
quency 2W-f (or in general ±(iW +f)) in the pass band (f
-------
With these assumptions, derivation of the optimum filter is relatively straightforward.
The spectrum of the error in recovery can be shown to be given by
= |y - ei2ffhf|2 *m(f) + |Y (1)
where
Y = Y(f) = transfer function of optimum recovery system
h - permissible delay of recovered signal behind sampled input
^c(f) = power spectral density of recovery error
4>m(f) = power spectral density of message
^n(f) = "noise" spectrum
= £ i (( - nf ) + 4> (f + nf)
1s m s
n = 1
These <|>m and spectra are shown in Figure 1 where is simply the spectrum of
the desired message before sampling, while n corresponds to the summation of all the
aliased frequency components due to upper and lower side bands of the message modula-
tion with respect to all possible harmonics of sampling frequency. By study it is seen
that Equation 1 is the exact form of the equation for the error in extracting a signal cor-
responding to from noise corresponding to ^n. The first term, Y -
is the spectrum of the so-called error of omission or transient distortion, attributable to
the fact that the filter transfer function is other than unity. The second term is the error
of commission, the noise power, which is not rejected by the filter. Expressed in this
form, all recent developments of statistical noise-filter design theory are applicable to
the solution for the optimum linear recovery system and its resultant error.
Solution for Optimum Filter
For cases of real-time recovery or interpolation, the general method of Wiener is avail-
able for the solution of Equation 1. By this method the specified message and noise spectra
and the permissible delay h determine the filter. This method is too complicated to permit
solution of a large number of illustrative examples. There is a special case of the Wiener
filter, however, which permits a very simple solution and furthermore affords a close
estimate of the resulting error for a more general solution; this corresponds to permitting
infinite lag or delay in the filter, i. e., h ¦> oo. The straightforward derivation of this
0-2
-------
0
2f
f
s
»
UNDESIRED ("NOISE") SPECTRUM
DUE TO MODULATION OR ALIASING
r*
-f
0
2f
»
Figure 1. Signal and Noise Spectra
-------
special case is given by Bode and Shannon. ^ The optimum finer Y is given by
Y (i) = 4>m(f> (e12ffhl) (2)
+ *n
and the resultant error spectral density is, from Equation 1
& (0 = ™ n (3)
n
and the total mean-square ui power error la the integral over ail frequencies
_ °f 4> 4>
' f A m 11 ^ (4)
0 m +
These results are directly applicable to the design of numerical interpolation filters
where (essentially) infinite delay or lag is permissible.
High Cutoff Rate Spectrum
It is intuitively evident that the most important parameter in determining the optimum
recovery filter and its error is the rate of spectrum fall-off in the vicinity of the cross-
over or Nyquist frequency. The present example utilizes this fact to yield approximate
solutions for arbitrary rates of cutoff.
The approximation is made that near and higher than the Nyquist frequency signal spec-
trum can be represented
^m(« = *mfN) (5)
In terms of experimental data, n could be found in terms of the logarithmic derivative
dlog m
n = -
d log f ,
(6)
fN . Hn
fN
2. Bode, H.W. and Shannon, C.E., "A Simplified Derivation of Linear Least Square
Smoothing and Prediction Theory," Procedures of the IRE, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 417-425,
April 1950.
0-4
-------
In view of Equation 5, the alias or noise spectrum can be represented
*n"l = V. " « ~ ~.A **>*¦¦
¦ w
ftH)"
(7)
Magnitude of the transfer function of the optimum long-lag filter is given by Equation 2
for +
m n
Which is plotted in Figure 2 for n = 2, 4, 6, 10, 20. Note that in no case Is an infinite
cutoff rate optimum. In all cases the 50 percent response is at the Nyquist frequency,
and the cutoff rate is equal to the falloff rate of the spectrum. For example, the optimum
recovery filter for an f~* spectrum is an f~* filter. Since in the first case this is power
and in the second case voltage, it is equivalent to a -12-db-per-octave spectrum and a
-24-db-per-octave filter.
After optimum filtering, the resultant error spectrum is, by Equation 3
~ (i).
*m + *n
which is plotted in Figure 3, again for n=2, 4, 6, 10, and 20. The error spectrum
is normalized with respect to the message spectral density 4>m(fN) at the Nyquist fre-
quency, fN, and it is seen that the error spectral density is always half the message
spectral density at f^.
These spectral densities have been Integrated, and the results are plotted in Figure 4.
Here the quantity plotted is In, which is the spectrum integral normalized with respect
to fM (fxr)- In other words
N m N oc
7* •/ ~.«'»
- 'n Vn> \ <»)
0-5
-------
.3
.5
.6
.8
.9
1.0
f/f
SAMPLING
FREQUENCY
Figure 2. Optimum Recovery Filter for Spectrum which Falls Off
-------
A
SAMPLING
FREQUENCY
©
-j Figure 3. Sampled Data Error Spectrum After Optimum
Signal Spectrum is Assumed to Fall Off as (f)~n
-------
c
Figure 4, Alias Error with Optimum Filtering
-------
Again it is the fractional error that is of Interest, that is
P/p.JnVV, m
n n
In order to make this normalization more meaningful, define
'c ° Cm"f '") n~l % <10>
of
p - [wvy*] 'c <">
In this form it is evident that the quantity In brackets is an effective low-frequency spec-
tral density, and fc is the effective roll-off frequency.
Then finally
~^/P = (fc/yn_1 In (12)
or
V^/p =
which is plotted in Figure 5 for n = 2, 4, 6, 10, 20. These curves Bhow, for example,
that a frequency ratio (f _/f ) of ten to one is required for one percent error in a case
s c
where n = 6; that is, an 18-db-per-octave spectrum cutoff rate.
Application of the Aliasing Error Theory
A central result of the aliasing error theory is contained in Figure 5. For example,
one infers from this result that for a spectrum falling offas f" (power) a sampling fre-
quency some thirty times the effective shoulder or cutoff frequency would be required
to limit the aliasing error to 1 percent. Sampling rates dictated by careless application
of these results can be ridiculously large with respect to common practice or common
sense.
The principal deterrent to the use of these results generally arises from lack of knowledge
of the signal spectrum. Often it is not known whether a given transducer signal will pro-
vide a spectrum falling off as f , or even white or flat spectrum. To be quite
0-9
-------
0
1
a.
A
>
o
ac
at
<
z
o
u
2
.2
,10
.04
.02
.01
- —¦r-
-
rr,"
/
/i
ft,'
' /
/
/
/I r
n=
s
=2
$
0* - i
io9^
I /
/
Uj J
^ f
1 1
1 '
i !
i ;
" >
— i
Tr~ ^3
"frf
-f
£ V
£
,0
j ¦
-
v-
>7
1 "O1
-oH|
I
i
'
1, «7/
¦>==6 /
b | -
Sj
rv=
¦4
/
/
/
n=
ol
/
/
/
j ___i
n=20
! i h
.001
.01 .1
FREQUENCY RATIO f
f = CUTOFF FREQUENCY
c
n = CUTOFF RATE
1.0
t
ff = SAMPLE FREQUENCY
SAMPLING
FREQUENCY
Figure 5. Sampling Error After Optimum Recovery
for High Spectral Cutoff Rates
-------
conservative in design, one is often forced, by lack of actual cutoff rate data, to assume
(hat the signal spectrum is flat in cases where it is fairly evident on physical grounds
that one must indeed be in a region of the spectrum providing an inherent fall-off of some
unknown degree.
A second factor leading to a misuse of these results, and the consequent over-assumption
of the sampling rate requirement, has been a failure to distinguish between static and
dynamic accuracy requirements. It is one thing in a high accuracy digital system to re-
quire, say, 0.1% static or d-c accuracy, but quite another to require such accuracy in
the high frequency region. As an example of the implications of such an inaccuracy stipu-
lation in a dynamic sense, note that the filter distortion error of even a simple R-C low-
pass filter section introduces 0.1% error at a frequency of 1/1000 the shoulder frequency,
or higher. In this respect, the results of Figure 5 may be considered inherently mis-
leading in that they evaluate, or weigh equally, errors occurring at all frequencies up to
the Nyquist frequency. Figure 6 shows the dynamic aliasing error that will result at
a specific sampling frequency for a defined data filter characteristic.
A suggested practical design procedure circumvents some of these difficulties with some
typical examples shown below.
Example 1
The system is specified as:
System Accuracy - 0.1% static (dc), 5% dynamic (at upper frequency of Interest)
Sample Frequency - (f J 125 cycles
Cutoff Frequency - 50 cycles
Signal Spectrum - The signal spectrum will be assumed flat for the purpose of
this example, if this is reasonable in context, in any case, a
spot spectrum check, with fixed narrow bandpass filters at
f_/2f_ and 2f_, is highly desirable.
8 S 8
What filter cutoff rate is required in order to meet these specifications? From Figure
5 it is seen that a ratio of f„/f_ = 0.4 coincides with a dynamic aliasing error of 5%
c s
at a filter cutoff rate of n = 10 or 60 db per octave.
0-11
-------
8
6
4
2
10
8
6
4
2
1
8
6
4
2
.1
1
1
SAMPL
5
1,000
10,000
f. IN CPS
Figure 6- Dynamic Aliasing Error Vs Sampling Frequency
for Various Filter Characteristics
-------
Example 2
System Accuracy - 0. 1% static
System Frequency - 16(i cycles
Cutoff Frequency - 50 cycles
Signal Spectrum - The signal spectrum is flat
What will be the dynamic error, due to aliasing in the above specification, for a filter
cutoff rate of n = 4 and a filter cutoff rate of n = 6? (These filter cutoff rates were
chosen because they are physically realizable.) Again, from Figure 5 it is seen that an
rms error due to aliasing of 37% could be expected for a filter cutoff of n = 4, and an
rms aliasing error of 15% could be expected for a filter cutoff rate o. n = 6.
Example 3
System Accuracy - 0.1% static, 0.1% dynamic
Cutoff Frequency - 50 cycles
Signal Spectrum - The signal spectrum is flat
What sampling frequency is required in order to meet the above specifications ? From
Figure 5 and Figure 6 it is seen that the dynamic aliasing error will be 0.1% for a
filter cutoff rate of n = 4 at a sampling frequency of 8.33 kc. If the filter cutoff rate is
increased to n = 6 then a sampling frequency of only 1.35 kc is required.
0-13/14
------- |