United States Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control EPA 460/3-88-008
Environmental Protection Emission Control Technology Division September 1988
Agency 2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Air
vvEPA Variability of l/M Test Scores
Over Time
-------
EPA 460/3-88-008
Variability of l/M Test Scores Over Time
by
Lawrence R. Smith
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
Contract No. 68-03-4044
Work Assignment B-2
EPA Project Officer: Craig A. Harvey
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
September 1988
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report technical
data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are available free of charge
to Federal employees, current contractors and grantees, and nonprofit organizations
- in limited quantities - from the Library Services Office, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by Southwest
Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas, in fulfillment of Work
Assignment No. B-2 of Contract 68-03-4044. The contents of this report are
reproduced herein as received from Southwest Research Institute. The opinions,
findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those
of the Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is
not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-88-008
ii
-------
FOREWORD
This project was conducted for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by
the Department of Emissions Research, Southwest Research Institute. The program,
authorized by Work Assignment B-2 under Contract 68-03-4044, was initiated
August 11, 1987 and completed in March 1988. It was identified within Southwest
Research Institute as Project 08-1567-002. The EPA Project Officer for the
program was Mr. Craig A. Harvey and the Project Technical Monitor was Mr. Larry
Landman, both of the Emission Control Technology Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
SwRI Project Leader and principal researcher for the project was Dr. Lawrence R.
Smith. Mr. Charles T. Hare was Project Manager, and was involved in the initial
technical and fiscal negotiations and subsequent major program decisions. Key
technical personnel involved at SwRI included: W.C. Olson, D.M. Lovell, K.M. Jack,
P.J. Nickoloff, C.E. Grinstead, and S.G. Nino.
iii
-------
ABSTRACT
This program involved conducting twice-weekly I/M (Inspection and
Maintenance) emission short tests on twenty-five late model gasoline-fueled
vehicles over a 15-week time period. All of the twenty-five vehicles (1981 model
year or later) were tested once in the morning and again later that same day
following a soak period of at least three hours. The vehicles tested in the program
were owned by Southwest Research Institute employees and were selected to
represent a variety of vehicle types, emission controls, etc. Emission tests were
conducted using two Bear Automotive Type 42-925 4-Gas Infrared Analyzers with
generic software. Each emission test sequence included a "Test Analyzer
Specifications" ("TAS") sequence (i.e., 2500 rpm/idle test with emissions measured in
both modes), a vehicle conditioning step utilizing three minutes of engine operation
at 2500 + 300 rpm with the vehicle transmission in neutral, idling in neutral for 15
seconds, and finally a second TAS sequence. The tests were conducted to provide
EPA with information regarding:
Variability in short test emission results
Impact of off-idle no-load preconditioning cycles on short test emissions,
and
Emission differences between a fully-warmed vehicle and a "soaked"
vehicle having undergone minimum operation.
Hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions are reported for each vehicle in tabular
and graphical form. Hydrocarbons are reported in ppm and carbon monoxide in
percent.
iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD iii
ABSTRACT iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES vii
SUMMARY viii
I. INTRODUCTION 1
IL VEHICLE EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE TESTING, AND TEST SEQUENCE 3
A. Test Vehicle 3
B. Emission Testing Equipment 6
C. Vehicle Testing 7
D. Test Sequence 8
IIL TEST RESULTS 12
A. HC Emissions - 2500 RPM 12
B. HC Emissions - Idle 17
C. CO Emissions - 2500 RPM 17
D. CO Emissions - Idle 17
APPENDICES
A. OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURES DURING EACH TEST DAY
B. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION
C. ENGINE AND EXHAUST MAINTENANCE AND ANALYZER COMMENTS
D. I/M TEST RESULTS
E. PLOTS OF HC-2500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-200 PPM SCALE
F. REPLOTS OF HC-2500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-600 PPM
OR 0-1500 PPM SCALE
G. PLOTS OF HC-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-200 PPM SCALE
H. REPLOTS OF HC-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-400 OR
0-800 PPM SCALE
I. PLOTS OF CO-2500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-2 PERCENT
SCALE
J. REPLOTS OF CO-2500 PRM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-1, 0-6,
OR 0-7 PERCENT SCALE
K. PLOTS OF CO-IDLE RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-2 PERCENT
SCALE
L. REPLOTS OF CO-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME, 0-2 PERCENT
SCALE
v
-------
UST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Memorandum Soliciting Vehicles for the Test Program 4
2 Initial Vehicle Inspection Sheet 5
3 Pre-Test Checklist (Morning Test) 9
4 Pre-Test Checklist (Afternoon Test) 10
vi
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Test Vehicles Selected for I/M Testing 6
2 Results of Fuel Lead Analysis Using SGI Model 33060
Ledometer Kit 7
3 Average HC 2500 RPM Emissions, PPM 13
4 Average HC Idle Emissions, PPM 14
5 Average CO 2500 RPM Emissions, Percent 15
6 Average CO Idle Emissions, Percent 16
vii
-------
SUMMARY
Twice-weekly I/M emission short tests were conducted on twenty-five late
model {1981 model year or later) gasoline-fueled vehicles over a 15-week time
period. Each vehicle was tested once in the morning upon arrival at the test site
from home and again later that same day following a soak period of three or more
hours. The vehicles tested in the program were owned by Southwest Research
Institute employees and represented a variety of vehicle types and emission control
systems. Emission tests were conducted using Bear Automotive Type 42-925 4-Gas
Infrared Analyzers with generic software. Each emission test included a "TAS"
sequence (2500 rpm and idle tests with emissions measured in both modes), a three-
minute 2500 rpm conditioning step, and a second TAS sequence. The tests were
conducted to provide EPA with information on the variability in short test emission
results, the impact of off-idle no-load preconditioning cycles on short test
emissions, and emission differences between a fully-warmed vehicle and a "soaked"
vehicle having undergone minimum operation. Hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide,
oxygen, and carbon dioxide emissions were measured for each test mode. Only the
hydrocarbon emissions (in ppm) and carbon monoxide emissions (in percent) were
reported and evaluated in this program. The most significant observations made
from the data generated (not necessarily in order of importance) are as follows:
In general, the average hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions were
lower (or unchanged) after the 2500 rpm conditioning step for both the
2500 rpm and idle tests, both during the morning and afternoon test
sequences.
Vehicle 09, a 1985 Volkswagen Golf, gave atypical results with average
carbon monoxide emission increases on the 2500 rpm mode of
approximately two volume percent after the 2500 rpm conditioning with
the morning 2500 rpm test (average increased from 1.11 to 3.20 percent)
and the afternoon idle test (average increased from 0.07 to 2.03
percent).
Emissions were typically higher (or unchanged) for the tests after the
three-hour soak period than for the morning test.
Some of the vehicles had average hydrocarbon increases of greater than
100 ppm for the 2500 rpm test (Vehicle 05, a 1981 Honda Civic; Vehicle
06, a 1985 Honda Accord; Vehicle 10, a 1985 BMW 318i; Vehicle 13, a
Ford Ranger; and Vehicle 19, a 1985 Chevrolet Cavalier) and the idle
test (Vehicle 05; Vehicle 10; Vehicle 13; Vehicle 17, a 1986 Ford E-150
Van; Vehicle 19; Vehicle 22, a 1987 Chevrolet Astro Van; and Vehicle 23,
a 1987 Nissan Pulsar), and carbon monoxide emission increases of greater
than one volume percent for the 2500 rpm test (Vehicle 05; Vehicle 06;
and Vehicle 16, a 1986 Ford Thunderbird) and idle test (Vehicle 17) for
the tests after the soak period as compared to the morning tests.
Many of the vehicles had highly variable hydrocarbon and carbon
monoxide emission rates over the 15-week test period, with standard
deviations greater than the averaged results. A number of the high
standard deviation values could be significantly reduced by excluding one
viii
-------
or two unexplained outliers from the data set. Other high standard
deviations (in relation to the average value) were associated with
average values of less than 10 ppm hydrocarbons and 0.1 percent carbon
monoxide.
The idle and 2500 rpm test results have been summarized in the following
tables. The test results are compared to the 1.2 percent carbon monoxide and the
220 ppm hydrocarbon cut points.
SUMMARY OF IDLE TEST RESULTS
Percent of tests exceeding
1.2/220a
Morning Tests
Before
After
2500 rpm
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Conditioning
3.2
1.3
Afternoon Tests
Before
After
2500 rpm
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Conditioning
20
3.5
Percent of all vehicles 20 8.0 48 16
exceeding 1.2/220 at
least once
Percent of all vehicles 16 4.0 44 8.0
exceeding 1.2/220 at
least twice
Percent of all vehicles 0
exceeding 1.2/220 at least
50 percent of the tests
Percent of all vehicles 4.0
exceeding 1.2/220 for at
least one pair of adjacent
weeks
Percent of tests exceeding 83
1.2/220 that are isolated
and unexplained*5
0 20 0
4.0 28 8.0
40 19 38
al.2/220, 1.2 percent carbon monxide and/or 220 ppm hydrocarbons.
^Both the previous and subsequent week's results did not exceed 1.2/220, and
not clearly related to vehicle maintenance or need of maintenance.
ix
-------
SUMMARY OF 2500 RPM TEST RESULTS
Morning Tests Afternoon Tests
Before
After
Before
After
2500 rpm
2500 rpm
2500 rpm
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Conditioning
Conditioning
Conditioning
Percent of tests exceeding 5.6 8.9 16 6.5
1.2/220a
Percent of all vehicles 20 20 40 20
exceeding 1.2/220 at
least once
Percent of all vehicles 12 12 28 20
exceeding 1.2/220 at
least twice
Percent of all vehicles 4.0
exceeding 1.2/220 at least
50 percent of the tests
Percent of all vehicles 12
exceeding 1.2/220 for at
least one pair of adjacent
weeks
12 12 4.0
12 24 12
Percent of tests exceeding 14 9.1 19 21
1.2/220 that are isolated
and unexplained^
al.2/220, 1.2 percent carbon monxide and/or 220 ppm hydrocarbons.
^Both the previous and subsequent week's results did not exceed 1.2/220, and
not clearly related to vehicle maintenance or need of maintenance.
x
-------
L INTRODUCTION
The objectives of this program were to determine the variability in short
test emission results, the impact of off-idle no-load preconditioning cycles on short-
term emissions, and the emission differences between a fully-warmed vehicle and a
"soaked" vehicle with minimum operation after starting. Twice-weekly I/M
(Inspection and Maintenance) emission short tests were conducted on twenty-five
late model (1981 model year and later) gasoline-fueled vehicles over a 15-week time
period. Each vehicle was tested once in the morning and again later the same day
after a soak period of at least three hours. Each emission test sequence included a
"TAS" sequence (i.e., 2500 rpm and idle test with hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide
emissions measured on both modes) and a vehicle conditioning step utilizing three
minutes of engine operation at 2500 rpm, followed by a second TAS sequence. This
report describes the vehicles, the analyzers, and the test procedures; and reports the
results of the testing in tabular and graphical form. Hydrocarbon emissions are
reported in parts per million and carbon monoxide emissions in percent.
The twenty-five vehicles tested in this program were owned by Southwest
Research Institute employees and were selected to represent a variety of vehicle
types and emission control systems. A complete list and descriptions of the vehicles
can be found in Section II of this report. Before accepting the vehicles into the
program, each vehicle was subjected to an initial vehicle inspection including checks
for emission tampering, for lead in the fuel, and for lead in tailpipe deposits
(Plumbtesmo paper test). An increasing scale of cash incentives was used to keep
the vehicle owners interested in the program and from dropping out late in the
program.
Two Bear Automotive Type 42-925 4-Gas Infrared Analyzers with generic
software were used to conduct the "TAS" sequences on the vehicles. TAS refers to
the May 1983 revision to the Test Analyzer Specifications published by the
California Bureau of Automotive repair. Gas calibrations on the analyzers were
performed at least daily with a low range calibration gas (1.6 percent carbon
monoxide, 600 ppm propane, and 11 percent carbon dioxide) in accordance with the
manufacturer's specifications.
The vehicles were tested twice on one day of the week (once in the morning
and again later the same day following a three-hour minimum soak period) over the
15-week test period. Vehicles were typically tested Monday through Thursday with
an attempt to vary the day of the week a given vehicle was tested. Tests were
conducted on Friday if scheduling difficulties were encountered or retesting was
required. Vehicle tests were scheduled at 15-minute intervals (both in the morning
and after the soak period) to minimize waiting time. Ambient temperatures were
recorded at the midpoint of each test period. Vehicle owners completed checklists
during each test sequence to provide information on fuel gauge readings, fuel
purchased, odometer mileage, vehicle operation while waiting for testing, and any
vehicle maintenance since the previous test.
Each test sequence performed on the 25 test vehicles consisted of the
following steps: (1) connect tachometer pickup to vehicle without turning off engine,
(2) perform TAS sequence - 2500 rpm and idle tests with emissions measured in both
modes, (3) run three minutes of 2500 rpm engine conditioning, (4) idle for 15
-------
seconds, and (5) perform a second TAS sequence. For each of the four Ford/Mercury
vehicles, the engine was shut off for 15 seconds prior to both TAS sequences.
Hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and carbon dioxide emissions were measured
and recorded for each test mode. Only the carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon
emissions are discussed in this report.
2
-------
IL VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE TESTING, AND TEST SEQUENCE
This section describes the test vehicles, the TAS-type analyzers, and the test
procedures utilized in this project. The vehicle procurement process is also
described in detail.
A. Test Vehicles
Twenty-five gasoline-powered light-duty vehicles were evaluated in this
project. The vehicles are listed in Table 1 along with their engine sizes and fuel
delivery systems. All but one of the vehicles were procured from the SwRI
Department of Emissions Research (DER) staff. These DER employees all worked
at the test site location. The remaining vehicle (Vehicle Number 23) was procured
from an SwRI employee in a building located across the street from the test site
(approximately an additional 100 yards from the test site). The vehicle procurement
process consisted of sending a memorandum (Figure 1) to the DER Staff requesting
vehicles for the program. A total of thirty-three responses to the memorandum
were received, and the twenty-five vehicles were selected from these responses.
The set of vehicles listed in Table 1 was selected to meet the requirements set forth
in the project Work Plan for fleet breakdown by fuel injection/carburetion,
passenger car/light-duty truck, imported/domestic, GM/non-GM, and open-
loop/closed-loop. The required and selected mixes of vehicles are listed below:
Required
Number of
Number of
Vehicles
Criterion
Vehicles
Selected
Fuel Injected
13
13
Carbureted
12
12
Passenger Car
18
18
Light-Duty Truck
7
7
Domestic
15-20
15
Imported
5-10
10
GM
12
9
Open-Loop
5-12
5
Closed-Loop
13-20
20
The eight vehicles volunteered but not selected for the program were all light-duty
trucks. Due to the limitation of seven light-duty trucks for the program, these
vehicles were not used.
Before accepting the vehicles into the program, each vehicle was subjected to
an initial vehicle inspection. A sample inspection sheet is shown in Figure 2. None
of the vehicles showed signs of emission tampering and all were in acceptable
operating condition. All vehicles exhibited negative results for the Plumbtesmo
paper tailpipe lead test. Fuel samples were taken from each vehicle during the
initial inspection and analyzed for lead using a Scientific Glass & Instruments, Inc.
3
-------
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
POST OFFICE DRAWER 26510 <220 CULEBRA ROAD SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS. USA 78264 1512) 614-5111 TELEX 244646
The Department of Emissions Research is currently conducting a program for
the U.S. EPA to determine variability in I/M testing. A total of 25 passenger cars
and light-duty trucks (1981 model year or newer) are needed for the program.
Testing would require approximately 10 minutes of time before work and 10 minutes
of time during lunch once a week for 15 weeks (15 test days). You would not need to
leave your test vehicle for the testing. If your car is used in the program, you would
be given $20 for each of the first five test days, $25 for each of the second five test
days, and $30 for each of the last five test days (a total of $375 over the 15 week
period). Questions regarding the testing may be directed to Lawrence Smith (ext.
2977). If you are willing to participate in the program please fill out the form and
return it to Lawrence Smith at Building 87.
Yes, I would like to participate in the I/M program to be conducted at the
Department of Emissions Research.
Year Make Model
Engine Displacement No. of cylinders
Fuel Injection (Y/N)
Name Dept.
Telephone No.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
DER Staff
FROM: Lawrence R. Smith
SUBJECT: Use of Staff Owned Vehicles for I/M Testing
DATE: October 7, 1987
/Imf
SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS
DALLAS. TEXAS OETROIT, MICHIGAN HOUSTON. TEXAS WASHINGTON. DC
FIGURE 1. MEMORANDUM SOLICITING VEHICLES FOR THE TEST PROGRAM
k
-------
INITIAL VEHICLE INSPECTION
Date:
/ /.
Make
Model
Model Year
Transmission
Engine Displacement
Engine Family
VIN
Project Vehicle No
1. Can the vehicle be operated in netural at 2500 rpm for three (3) minutes
without damage? (Y/N)
~If No, stop inspection and reject vehicle.
2. Are the oxygen sensor and ECM pigtails connected? (Y/N)
3. What is the status of the idle mixture seals? (intact, tampered, not verified)
4. Are any electrical lines or vacuum hoses misrouted or disconnected? (Y/N)
Explain
5. What is the status of the air pump and secondary air routing valves?
6. Is the catalyst in place? (Y/N)
7. Is the fuel filler inlet restrictor enlarged or missing? (Y/N)
8. What is the result of the tailpipe lead test using Plumbtesmo paper?
(positive/negative)
9. What is the lead content of the fuel?
10. Which, if any, computer trouble codes are present?
FIGURE Z. INITIAL VEHICLE INSPECTION SHEET
5
-------
TABLE 1. TEST VEHICLES SELECTED FOR I/M TESTING
Vehicle
Number
Year
Make
Model
Engine
Displacement, &
Fuel
Injection
Yes/No
Closed-Loop
Control
(Yes/No)
01
1982
Mercury
Zephyr
3.3
No
No
02
1984
Dodge
Ramcharger
5.9
No
No
03
1984
Oldsmobile
Delta 88
5.0
No
Yes
04
1985
Chevrolet
Silverado
5.0
No
No
05
1981
Honda
Civic
1.3
No
No
06
1985
Honda
Accord
1.8
No
Yes
07
1987
Jeep
Cherokee
4.0
Yes
Yes
08
1982
Peugeot
505
2.0
Yes
Yes
09
1985
Volkswagen
Golf
1.8
Yes
Yes
10
1985
BMW
318i
1.8
Yes
Yes
11
1986
Nissan
Pulsar
1.6
No
Yes
12
1984
Chevrolet
Suburban
5.7
No
No
13
1985
Ford
Ranger
2.3
Yes
Yes
14
1986
Oldsmobile
Cutlass Supreme
3.8
No
Yes
15
1987
Hyundai
Excel GLS
1.5
No
Yes
16
1986
Ford
Thunderbird
2.3
Yes
Yes
17
1986
Ford
E-150 Van
5.0
Yes
Yes
18
1984
Chevrolet
Caprice Classic
5.0
No
Yes
19
1985
Chevrolet
Cavalier
2.0
Yes
Yes
20
1987
Buick
LeSabre
3.8
Yes
Yes
21
1982
Volkswagen
Scirocco
1.7
Yes
Yes
22
1987
Chevrolet
Astro Van
4.3
Yes
Yes
23
1987
Nissan
Pulsar
1.6
Yes
Yes
24
1986
Buick
Century
2.8
No
Yes
25
1982
Volvo
240DL
2.1
Yes
Yes
Model 33060 Ledometer Kit. The results of these analyses are presented in Table 2.
All twenty-five vehicles had a lead content in the fuel of less than 0.05 g/gal.
In an attempt to keep vehicle owners interested in the program and to prevent
them from dropping out late in the program, an increasing scale of each incentives
was used (Figure 1). This increasing scale consisted of $20 for each of the first five
test days, $25 for each of the second five test days, and $30 for each of the last five
test days. Only one owner dropped out of the program (after 12 test days) because
of retirement and a move out of state. Due to the late date of this withdrawal from
the program, the vehicle was not replaced in the program.
B. Emission Testing Equipment
Two Bear Automotive Type 42-925 4-Gas Infrared Analyzers with generic
software were leased for use in the program. The analyzer software used in the
program allowed a "TAS" sequence to be performed on each vehicle. "TAS" refers
to the May 1983 revision of the "Test Analyzer Specifications" published by the
California Bureau of Automotive Repair. One of the analyzers was used with a
6
-------
TABLE 2. RESULTS OF FUEL LEAD ANALYSES USING
SGI MODEL 33060 LEDOMETER KIT
Vehicle
Lead Content,
Number
Vehicle Make and Model
e/eal
01
Mercury Zephyr
0.036
02
Dodge Ramcharger
0.045
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
0.021
04
Chevrolet Silverado
0.022
05
Honda Civic
0.023
06
Honda Accord
0.001
07
Jeep Cherokee
0.035
08
Peugeot 505
0.006
09
Volkswagen Golf
0.014
10
BMW 318i
0.023
11
Nissan Pulsar
0.023
12
Chevrolet Suburban
0.024
13
Ford Ranger
0.017
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
0.023
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
0.046
16
Ford Thunderbird
0.011
17
Ford E-150 Van
0.025
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
0.006
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
0.010
20
Buick LeSabre
0.005
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
0.021
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
0.014
23
Nissan Pulsar
0.007
24
Buick Century
0.027
25
Volvo 240 DL
0.023
Snap-on MT255 Distributorless Adaptor to allow rpm measurements on Vehicle 20,
which had a GM distributorless ignition system. A Scott Certified Blend of 1.6
percent carbon monoxide, 600 ppm propane (300 ppm hexane), and 11 percent carbon
dioxide was used as the calibration gas for the analyzers. Gas calibrations were
performed with the low range calibration gas in accordance with Bear's
specifications and were conducted at least daily. All calibrations and leak checks
were documented in a log book maintained with each analyzer. Documentation
entries included the date, initials of person performing the calibration, and the
results of the calibration. All maintenance performed on the analyzers, including
changing of the calibration gas cylinders, was included in the log book. One unit
(designated as SwRI Unit No. 1) had intermittent problems with a loose cable
connection which was repaired in-house. This same unit went out of calibration
during the thirteenth week of testing and had to be repaired by Bear. This unit was
not used again until the final week of testing.
C. Vehicle Testing
Each of the 25 vehicles was tested twice on one day of the week (once in the
morning and again later that same day following a soak period of three to four
7
-------
hours) over a period of 15 weeks. One of the vehicles (Vehicle 13) completed only
twelve sequences in the program because of the retirement and subsequent move to
Arizona of the owner. Prior to the move, two test sequences (two test days) were
conducted on the vehicle during the week of January 25 for the eleventh and twelfth
test sequences. Vehicle 21 was also tested two days a week during the weeks of
February 8, 15, and 22. The owner of Vehicle 21 was out of town during a large part
of the program, and this procedure change was necessary to complete the testing of
Vehicle 21 during the same time period as the other test vehicles. Before being
implemented, this procedure change was approved by the EPA Project Technical
Monitor.
Vehicles were typically tested Monday through Thursday with an attempt to
vary the day of the week a given vehicle was tested. Tests were also conducted on
Friday if required due to scheduling difficulties. No vehicle was tested more than
five times, and only two were tested more than four times, on any one day of the
week. Five to seven vehicles were tested during a typical test day. Vehicles were
scheduled for testing between 7:30 and 8:30 in the morning, at 15-minute intervals,
to minimize waiting time and lost work time, and to eliminate as much of the
inconvenience to the drivers as possible. Each vehicle was rescheduled for a second
test between 10:45 AM and 12:15 PM on the same day. These tests were scheduled
to allow the vehicle to soak for a minimum of three hours. As was the case for the
morning tests, the vehicles were scheduled at 15-minute intervals to minimize
waiting time. The Technical Project Monitor, Mr. Larry Landman, visited SwRI on
November 17 and 18. Mr. Landman was present to view morning and noon I/M
testing on November 18.
The outside air temperature was recorded at approximately the midpoint of
each testing period (both morning and at noon) each day. These temperature data
have been included in Appendix A. For each morning and noon test, vehicle owners
were asked to complete the checklists shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. The
information obtained from these checklists is summarized in the following
paragraph.
None of the vehicle owners reported purchasing fuel with alcohol. The owners
of Vehicles 03, 12, 14, and 22 reported that they were not sure if their last fuel
purchase contained any alcohol. Fuel gauge readings, waiting periods for morning
and noon tests, analyzers used for morning and noon tests (No. 01 or 02), test date,
and soak periods between morning and noon tests are included in Appendix Tables B-
1 through B-25. Any deviations from normal scheduled test periods and the
operating conditions of the test vehicles during waiting periods are also noted in the
tables. Appendix C contains a summary of the engine and exhaust maintenance and
analyzer operator comments that were recorded on the checklists.
D. Test Sequence
The TAS analyzers were each located at a separate garage door entrance to
the Department of Emissions Research high bay area. The test vehicles were driven
by their owners (or designated drivers) partially into the high bay area with their
exhaust pipes at or near the open bay door. Each of the test sequences (both
morning and noon) performed on each of the 25 test vehicles consisted of the
following steps. The analyzer's tachometer pickup was attached to the vehicle
without turning off the engine. For the Ford models (Vehicles 01, 13, 16, and 17),
8
-------
Pre-Test Checklist
Morning Test mileage:
Vehicle Number:
Date: / / Time: : A.M.
1. Was the vehicle brought directlv to the test site from
on-the-road operation? (Y/N)
ฆ*"ซ If NO, STOP the test and reschedule the vehicle for a
test sequence later in the week.
2.A. Did the vehicle wait in line before the test? (Y/N)
B. If yes, approximately how many minutes elapsed between
the time the vehicle arrived in line and the test
operator gave the first instruction to the driver?
If the vehicle waited in line more than 15 minutes,
STOP the test and reschedule the vehicle for a test
sequence later in the week if possible.
C. If the vehicle waited in line less than 15 minutes,
were any major accessories (e.g., heater/defroster,
A/C, rear window defogger) operating?
D. If the vehicle waited in line less than 15 minutes,
select the best description of the vehicle's operation
during the wait (check only one of the following):
Primarily idle-in-neutral except when
moving forward in line.
Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving
forward in line.
Primarily engine off. Restarted and
advanced in line as necessary.
Primarily with accelerator part way to the
floor, in neutral, to maintain high rpm.
3. What was the last fuel purchase (check only one of the
following) :
Gasoline with no alcohol
Gasoline with some alcohol
Not sure
4. What does the vehicle's fuel guage currently read?
5. What engine or exhaust maintenance (if any) was performed
since the last test? (This should include everything
engine related except refueling the vehicle and checking
the fluid levels. Adding oil must be reported.)
FIGURE 3. PRE-TEST CHECKLIST (MORNING TEST)
9
-------
Pre-Iest Checklist
Afternoon Test
Vehicle Number:
Date: / / Time: : P.M.
1. Was the vehicle operated off-site at any: time during
the past 3 hours? (Y/N)
**** If YES, STOP the test and reschedule the vehicle for a
test sequence later in the week if possible.
2.A. Did the vehicle wait in-line before the test? (Y/N)
B. If yes, approximately how many minutes elapsed between
the time the vehicle arrived in line and the test
operator gave the first instruction to the driver?
**** If the vehicle waited in line more than 15 minutes,
STOP the test and reschedule the vehicle for a test
sequence later in the week if possible.
C. If the vehicle waited in line less than 15 minutes,
were any major accessories (e.g., heater/defroster,
A/C, rear window defogger) operating?
D. If the vehicle waited in line less than 15 minutes,
select the best description of the vehicle's operation
during the wait (check only one of the following):
Primarily idle-in-neutra1 except when
moving forward in line.
Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving
forward in line.
Primarily engine off. Restarted and
advanced in line as necessary.
Primarily with accelerator part way to the
floor, in neutral, to maintain high rpm.
FIGURE 4. PRE-TEST CHECKLIST (AFTERNOON TEST)
10
-------
the engine was switched off; after 15 seconds, the engine was restarted, and the
probe was reinserted into the tailpipe. A TAS sequence (i.e., 2500 rpm/idle test
with emissions measured on both modes) was then performed. The "TAS Sequence"
used the Bear Automotive analyzers' software to determine when to measure the
emissions. The nomenclature used for the Bear analyzer test modes was the reverse
of what was described in EPA's request for a work plan (i.e., the Beau: analyzers'
"diagnostic mode" uses its software to determine when to measure the emissions,
and the emissions mode is a continuous measurement mode).
After the TAS sequence, the engine speed was increased to 2500 ฑ 300 rpm and
maintained for three minutes with the vehicle transmission remaining in neutral.
Because of the analzyers' software, it was necessary to use a second tachometer for
the three minutes of 2500 rpm operation. After the 2500 rpm operation, the vehicle
was returned to idle for 15 seconds. For the Ford models, the engine was switched
off, and the probe removed from the tailpipe. After 15 seconds, the engine was
restarted, and the probe reinserted into the tailpipe. Finally, a second TAS
sequence was performed. Hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and carbon
dioxide emissions were measured and recorded for each test mode.
11
-------
ffl. TEST RESULTS
This section presents the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emission results
for the TAS sequences conducted on each of the 25 test vehicles. The test data
have been tabulated, graphed, and averaged for each vehicle. A tabular summary of
the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emission test scores for each of the 25 test
vehicles is presented in Appendix D. Each appendix table identifies the vehicle by:
Vehicle Identification Number
Project Vehicle Number
Engine family
Engine displacement
Make, model, and model year, and
Transmission type.
Each table also presents the data in chronological order with the appropriate
morning odometer reading (miles). The emission results are presented in sixteen
columns including hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide results for the morning and
noon tests, both before and after three minutes of 2500 rpm conditioning and for
both the idle and 2500 rpm tests. Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6 present averages and
standard deviations of the hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide results for each vehicle
at each test condition over the 15-week test period. Appendices E, G, I, and K
present plots for each vehicle of the HC-2500 rpm, HC-Idle, CO-2500 rpm, and CO-
Idle emission results versus time, respectively. Each individual plot contains
separate plots for each of the four different values obtained each week (i.e.,
morning before and after 2500 rpm conditioning, and noon before and after 2500 rpm
conditioning).
On March 4, 1988, Dr. Lawrence Smith and Mr. Charles Hare of SwRI met with
Mr. Craig Harvey, Project Officer; Mr. Larry Landman, Project Technical Monitor;
and Mr. James A. McCargar, all of EPA-Ann Arbor to review the project status. At
this meeting, Mr. Landman and Mr. McCargar indicated that a common scale for the
hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions was necessary for vehicle-to-vehicle
comparisons. A review of the data indicated that most of the 2500 rpm and idle
hydrocarbon data (Appendices E and G) could be presented on a 0-200 ppmC scale
and that most of the 2500 rpm and idle (Appendices I and K) carbon monoxide data
could be presented on a 0-2 percent scale. Vehicles with several (four or more)
values exceeding the range for the scales were replotted with larger scales
(Appendices F, H, J, and L). The following sections discuss the hydrocarbon and
carbon monoxide emission results for the 2500 rpm and idle tests.
A. HC Emissions - 2500 RPM
The hydrocarbon emission test results at 2500 rpm were averaged for each
vehicle at each test point, with the averages and standard deviations presented in
Table 3. Plots of the data are included in Appendix E (hydrocarbons on 0-200 ppm
scale) for all vehicles and in Appendix F (hydrocarbons on larger scale) for Vehicles
02, 05, and 16. In general, the 2500 rpm hydrocarbon emissions were lower after the
2500 rpm conditioning step both during the morning and afternoon tests. Vehicles 09
(Volkswagen Golf) and 10 (BMW), however, did show an overall increase in
hydrocarbon emissions after the morning conditioning step. Pre-conditioned
12
-------
TABLE 3. AVERAGE HC 2500 RPM EMISSIONS, PPM
Morning Tests Afternoon Tests
Before After Before After
Project
Vehicle
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Number
Ave.
Std.Dev.
Ave.
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
01
25
121
7
14
33
1 17
10
13
02
85
ฑ 180
43
1 65
107
1 144
82
1 165
(17) a
1 (13)a
(19)a
1 (15)a
(53)a
1 (13)a
(19)a
i(U)a
03
34
114
17
113
82
165
47
179
(14)^
l(6)t>
04
5
ฑ3
3
12
38
19
3
12
05
10
ฑ4
4
12
210
1220
8
13
06
1
ฑ1
<1
i
-------
TABLE 4. AVERAGE HC IDLE EMISSIONS, PPM
Morning Tests Afternoon Tests
Before After Before After
Project
Vehicle
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Number
AvR.
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
>
t
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
01
120
ฑ 73
83
ฑ 19
94
ฑ37
79
ฑ 15
02
27
ฑ 12
20
ฑ 11
43
ฑ8
22
ฑ 9
03
32
ฑ 13
26
ฑ 21
90
ฑ75
47
ฑ79
(29) a
ฑ(31)a
04
4
+ 3
2
ฑ2
53
ฑ22
3
ฑ3
05
4
ฑ 2
2
ฑ1
175
ฑ70
3
ฑ2
06
7
ฑ 1
3
ฑ1
102
ฑ91
8
ฑ2
07
<1
ฑ 1
0
ฑ0
4
ฑ6
0
ฑ0
08
1
+ 1
<1
ฑ1
83
ฑ30
2
ฑ2
09
14
ฑ 19
10
ฑ10
22
ฑ6
49
ฑ 50
10
13
ฑ30
11
ฑ28
228
ฑ43
18
ฑ39
(6)b
ฑ(l6)b
(4)b
ฑ(5)b
(8)b
ฑ(3)b
11
2
ฑ2
1
ฑ1
21
ฑ51
2
ฑ2
(8)c
ฑ (6)c
12
16
+ 14
4
ฑ3
76
ฑ42
12
ฑ7
13
166
ฑ 153
144
ฑ119
328
ฑ 144
163
ฑ61
14
2
12
1
ฑ2
7
ฑ 19
1
ฑ 1
(3)d
ฑ(2)d
15
2
+ 2
0
ฑ0
17
ฑ13
3
ฑ2
16
29
ฑ29
14
ฑ21
110
ฑ85
23
ฑ29
17
21
ฑ13
12
ฑ11
225
ฑ 118
34
ฑ28
18
5
ฑ3
4
ฑ3
31
ฑ31
4
ฑ3
19
162
ฑ44
110
ฑ29
253
ฑ21
149
ฑ30
20
<1
ฑ1
0
ฑ0
4
ฑ2
0
ฑ0
21
3
ฑ3
13
ฑ19
25
ฑ6
10
ฑ9
22
53
ฑ36
62
ฑ28
223
ฑ32
55
ฑ33
23
22
ฑ52
2
ฑ3
217
ฑ73
9
ฑ 4
24
1
ฑ2
<1
ฑ1
3
ฑ3
< 1
ฑ 1
25
44
ฑ39
23
ฑ29
82
ฑ42
28
ฑ22
aValues in parentheses exclude data from the 1/26/88 test.
b Values in parentheses exclude data from 1/7/88 test.
cValues in parentheses exclude data from the 1/5/88 test.
^Values in parentheses exclude data from the 12/8/87 test.
14
-------
Project
Vehicle
Number
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
TABLE 5. AVERAGE CO 2500 RPM EMISSIONS, PERCENT
Morning Tests Afternoon Tests
Before
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Avg.
Std.Dfev,
0.02
ฑ0.05
0.02
ฑ0.02
0.02
ฑ0.06
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ 0.00
0.00
ฑ 0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
1.11
ฑ 1.15
0.94
ฑ0.36
0.01
ฑ0.02
0.01
ฑ0.03
0.32
ฑ0.37
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
1.47
ฑ0.59
0.05
ฑ0.15
0.01
ฑ0.02
0.06
ฑ 0.07
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.02
ฑ 0.05
<0.01
ฑ0.01
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.12
ฑ0.16
0.39
ฑ0.21
After
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Avg.
Std.Dev
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.01
ฑ0.02
0.20
ฑ0.34
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ0.01
3.20
ฑ 1.60
1.25
ฑ0.34
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.36
ฑ0.39
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
1.11
ฑ0.39
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.03
ฑ0.03
0.05
ฑ0.06
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.06
ฑ0.04
0.30
ฑ0.30
Before
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Avg.
Std.Dev.
0.01
ฑ0.03
0.75
ฑ0.45
0.81
ฑ 1.12
0.21
ฑ0.10
1.27
ฑ 1.48
2.47
ฑ0.86
0.04
ฑ0.03
0.40
ฑ0.22
0.13
ฑ0.05
1.49
ฑ0.29
0.58
ฑ 1.74
(0.13)
b ฑ (0.28)b
0.13
ฑ0.09
0.68
ฑ0.27
0.02
ฑ0.04
0.04
ฑ0.13
3.04
ฑ1.62
0.67
ฑ0.67
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.40
ฑ0.05
0.01
ฑ0.01
0.22
ฑ0.18
0.43
ฑ0.23
0.55
ฑ0.03
0.08
ฑ0.12
0.63
ฑ0.11
After
2500 rpm
Conditioning
Avg. Std.Dev.
0.00
+
0.00
0.01
+
0.01
0.62
+
1.24
(0.15)a
+
(0.15)a
0.00
+
0.00
0.00
+
0.00
0.00
+
0.00
0.00
+
0.00
0.01
+
0.01
0.19
+
0.40
0.90
+
0.35
0.01
+
0.02
0.00
+
0.00
0.80
+
0.73
0.00
+
0.00
0.00
+
0.00
1.63
+
0.45
0.12
+
0.31
0.03
+
0.04
0.06
+
0.03
0.00
+
0.00
0.02
+
0.08
0.01
+
0.01
0.00
+
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.37
+_
0.07
aValues in parentheses exclude data from the 12/3/87 and 1/26/88 tests.
^Values in parentheses exclude data from the 1/5/88 test.
-------
TABLE 6. AVERAGE CO IDLE EMISSIONS, PERCENT
Morning Tests Afternoon Tests
Before After Before After
Project
2500
rpm
2500
rpm
2500
rpm
2500 rpm
Vehicle
Conditioning
Conditioning
Conditioning
Conditioning
Number
Ave.
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
Avg.
Std.Dev.
AvS-
Std.Dev.
01
0.38
ฑ0.81
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
(0.01)a
ฑ(0.02)a
02
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.38
ฑ0.43
0.00
ฑ0.00
03
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.04
ฑ0.09
0.01
ฑ0.01
0.14
ฑ0.34
(0.06)b
ฑ(0.09)b
04
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.02
ฑ0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
05
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.45
ฑ 1.45
0.00
ฑ0.00
(0.09)c
ฑ(0.04)c
06
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.05
ฑ0.08
0.00
ฑ0.00
07
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
08
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.01
ฑ0.02
0.04
ฑ0.03
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
09
0.30
ฑ0.59
0.13
ฑ0.48
0.07
ฑ0.03
2.03
ฑ2.39
10
0.08
ฑ0.18
0.08
ฑ0.19
0.45
ฑ0.17
0.04
ฑ0.13
11
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.15
ฑ0.54
0.00
ฑ0.00
(0.01)d
ฑ (0.03)d
12
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.13
ฑ0.10
0.00
ฑ0.00
13
0.51
ฑ0.41
0.55
ฑ0.36
0.38
ฑ0.23
0.84
ฑ0.46
14
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.03
ฑ0.11
0.00
ฑ0.00
15
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.09
ฑ0.16
0.00
ฑ0.00
16
0.33
ฑ0.41
0.18
ฑ0.28
0.62
ฑ0.53
0.35
ฑ0.45
17
0.10
ฑ0.08
0.07
ฑ0.05
2.04
ฑ1.49
0.19
ฑ0.16
18
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.01
ฑ0.04
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.01
ฑ0.04
19
0.98
ฑ0.32
0.89
ฑ0.26
0.50
ฑ0.12
0.82
ฑ0.18
20
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ0.0 0
21
<0.01
ฑ0.01
0.13
ฑ0.22
0.02
ฑ0.02
0.03
ฑ0.04
22
0.14
ฑ0.10
0.22
ฑ0.15
1.02
ฑ0.32
0.36
ฑ0.23
23
0.13
ฑ0.31
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.64
ฑ0.44
0.00
ฑ0.00
24
0.00
ฑ0.00
0.00
ฑ0.00
<0.01
ฑ<0.01
0.00
ฑ0.00
25
0.28
ฑ0.24
0.14
ฑ0.15
0.59
ฑ0.39
0.14
ฑ0.04
aVaIues in parentheses exclude data from the 11/16/87, 1/12/88, and 2/25/88 tests.
''Values in parentheses exclude data from the 1/26/88 tests.
cValues in parentheses exclude data from 2/4/88 test.
^Values in parentheses exclude data from 1/5/88 test.
16
-------
hydrocarbon emissions were also higher for the afternoon tests (after the 3-hour
soak) than for the morning tests. After the 2500 rpm conditioning step, the
hydrocarbons were similar for the morning and afternoon tests.
Test data for Vehicle 02 were much higher on the last two test days than on
previous test days- The owner of Vehicle 02 indicated that after the test program
was completed, driveability problems were noted which were corrected by replacing
the spark plugs and one spark plug wire. The increase in hydrocarbons during the
last two test days was likely related to this problem. Averages and standard
deviations without the last two test points have been included in Table 3 in
parentheses. Test data for Vehicle 16 were also much higher on two particular test
days than on remaining test days; however, no component failure was noted during
this period. Averages and standard deviations excluding these two test days are
included in Table 3. Data have also been included in Table 3 excluding unexplained
outliers in the test results for Vehicles 02 and 11.
B. HC Emissions - Idle
The hydrocarbon emissions at idle were also averaged for each vehicle and test
point, with the averages and standard deviations presented in Table 4. Data plots
are included in Appendix G (hydrocarbons on 0-200 ppm scale) for all vehicles and in
Appendix H (hydrocarbons on larger scale) for Vehicles 01, 10, 13, 17, 19, 22, and 23.
The idle hydrocarbon emissions followed the same general trends as the 2500 rpm
hydrocarbon emissions, with reductions after conditioning and higher emissions for
the test following the three-hour soak. As was the case for the 2500 rpm results,
Vehicle 09 showed an increase in emissions after conditioning; however, in this case,
the increase occurred during the afternoon testing. Idle emission averages were
similar to the 2500 rpm emissions for a number of the cars, but Vehicles 01, 13, 19,
22, and 23 had higher idle emissions than 2500 rpm emissions. Averages and
standard deviations excluding atypical emission results for Vehicles 03, 10, and 14
are included in Table 4.
C. CO Emissions - 2500 rpm
Average carbon monoxide emissions for the 2500 rpm tests are presented in
Table 5. Plots of the data are found in Appendix I (carbon monoxide on 0-2 percent
scale) for all 25 vehicles, and in Appendix J (carbon monoxide on larger scale) for
Vehicles 03, 05, 06, 09, and 16. Carbon monoxide emissions for a number of the
vehicles (01, 07, 14, 17, 18, and 20) were low under all conditions (less than 0.05
percent) and no definite trends could be observed. The majority of the vehicles had
low morning carbon monoxide emissions, both before and after conditioning, and
noticeably higher emissions after the three-hour soak period (Vehicles 02, 04, 05, 06,
08, 11, 12, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 23). The 2500 rpm conditioning returned the carbon
monoxide emissions of these vehicles to (or near) the morning levels. Four of the
vehicles (03, 09, 10, and 13) gave overall carbon monoxide emission increases with
the 2500 rpm conditioning step. The carbon monoxide emissions for these vehicles
were extremely variable, with standard deviations near the average value.
D. CO Emissions - Idle
Average carbon monoxide emissions for the idle tests aire presented in Table 6,
and plots of the data are displayed in Appendix K (carbon monoxide on 0-2 percent
17
-------
scale) for all 25 vehicles and Appendix L (carbon monoxide on a larger scale) for
Vehicles 09 and 17. As was the case for the CO 2500 rpm emissions, many of the
vehicles had low idle CO emissions under all conditions, or had higher emissions for
the tests after the three-hour soak which returned to morning levels after the 2500
rpm conditioning. Five of the vehicles (03, 09, 13, 19, and 21) had overall carbon
monoxide emission increases after the 2500 rpm conditioning step. In general, the
carbon monoxide emissions were variable, with standard deviations near the average
value.
18
-------
APPENDIX A
OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURES DURING EACH TEST DAY
-------
TABLE A-l. OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURES DURING EACH TEST DAY
Date
Temperature, ฐF
Date
Temperature
ฐF
(1987)
Morning
Noon
(1988)
Morning
Noon
11/5
~
82
1/4
37
55
11/6
63
77
1/5
46
49
11/9
55
64
1/6
45
50
11/10
51
52
1/7
42
51
11/11
35
60
11/12
39
66
1/11
38
48
11/13
56
66
1/12
48
56
1/13
47
51
11/16
55
66
1/14
45
52
11/17
52
68
11/18
58
70
1/18
58
64
11/19
45
58
1/19
48
69
1/20
42
49
11/23
71
75
1/21
33
54
11/24
74
75
11/25
57
63
1/25
39
63
1/26
33
68
11/30
48
64
1/27
41
69
12/1
46
59
1/28
48
63
12/2
53
66
12/3
55
68
2/1
69
72
2/2
55
55
12/7
55
69
2/3
53
53
12/8
53
66
2/4
44
42
12/9
54
65
2/5
40
43
12/10
60
71
12/11
56
75
2/8
46
56
2/9
52
62
12/14
52
50
2/10
55
66
12/15
37
47
2/11
31
40
12/16
40
56
2/12
39
55
12/17
51
54
2/15
50
58
12/21
52
54
2/16
50
66
12/22
52
63
2/17
65
66
12/23
56
60
2/18
60
53
2/19
44
61
12/28
40
53
12/29
42
41
2/22
49
71
12/30
40
47
2/23
52
71
12/31
42
70
2/24
50
70
2/25
50
68
2/26
60
65
2/29
66
76
~Data not available.
A-2
-------
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION
Vehicle
Table B-
No.
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 318i
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
-------
TABLE B-l. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 01
Waiting
Period Soak
Noon Test, Period
Min. Hr:Min.
3:35
3:50
3:25
3:30
3:15
3:35
3:15
3:15
3:15
3:30
3:10
3:30
3:10
3:10
3:35
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
11/13
01
F
01
11/16
01
1/2
01
11/25
02
F
02
12/3
02
1/2
02
12/17
02
7/8
02
12/22
02
1/4
02
12/30
01
3/8
01
1/4
01
F
01
1/12
02
4*
3/4
02
1/18
01
7/8
01
1/27
02
-
1/2
02
2/9
02
7/8
02
2/17
02
1/4
02
2/25
01
3/4
01
2/29
01
3/4
01
B-2
-------
TABLE B-Z. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 02
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/12
02
1/2
02
3:30
11/18
02
1/4
02
3:15
11/24
01
1/2
01
3:15
11/30
01
1/2
01
3:30
12/9
02
1/2
02
3:30
12/15
02
1/2
02
3:10
1/6
02
1/2
02
3:35
1/11
01
1/4
01
3:35
1/21
01
01
4:35*
1/26
02
5**
1/4
02
3:20
2/3
01
1/4
01
3:15
2/8
02
1/4
02
3:30
2/16
02
1/2
02
3:20
2/26
01
1/2
01
3:20
2/29
01
1/4
01
__
3:40
*PM Test conducted at 12:30 PM.
**Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
B-3
-------
TABLE B-3. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 03
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
11/11
02
1/2
02
11/16
5*
1/2
11/24
02
1/2
02
12/3
01
1/2
01
12/7
02
3/4
02
12/16
02
1/8
02
12/21
01
1/4
01
12/29
01
3***
1/2
01
1/7
01
1/2
02
1/13
01
1/4
01
1/18
02
1/2
02
1/26
01
F
01
2/4
02
12***
3/4
02
2/12
02
7*
3/4
02
2/8
02
5*
3/4
02
Soak
Period
HriMin.
3:15
3:25
3:45
3:30
3:45
5:45**
4:00
3:45
4:05
3:05
3:30
3:45
3:15
3:45
3:15
*Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
**PM Test conducted at 1:30 PM
***primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
B-i
-------
TABLE B-4. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 04
Waiting
Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
11/11
01
1/2
01
11/19
01
1/4
01
11/23
01
1/2
01
12/1
01
1/4
01
12/11
02
1/2
02
12/16
02
1/4
02
12/21
01
3/4
01
1/5
01
1/4
01
1/14
02
7/8
01
1/19
01
3/4
01
1/27
02
1/2
02
2/1
02
5* *
1/4
02
2/11
01
3/4
02
2/17
02
1/4
02
2/23
01
3/8
01
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
3:30
3:25
4:20
3:45
3:35
5:20*
4:05
3:20
3:55
3:30
3:40
3:50
3:35
4:00
3:35
~PM Test conducted at 1:16 PM
~~Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No
accessories operating.
B-5
-------
TABLE B-5. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 05
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
HrsMin.
11/10
01
5*
1/2
01
3:10
11/18
02
3/4
02
3:45
11/23
02
1/2
02
3:45
12/2
02
3/4
02
3:30
12/10
02
1**
1/4
02
3:30
12/17
02
3/4
02
3:15
12/29
01
1/4
01
3:30
1/4
02
F
02
3:30
1/12
02
1/2
02
3:30
1/20
02
1/2
02
3:30
1/25
02
1/2
02
3:30
2/4
02
8*
3/4
02
3:35
2/8
02
1/2
02
3:25
2/16
02
3/4
02
3:25
2/24
01
F
01
3:15
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
~~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-6
-------
TABLE B-6. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 06
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/11
02
1/2
02
3:25
11/18
02
3/4
02
3:30
11/25
02
1/2
02
3:30
12/3
02
3/4
02
3:30
12/7
02
1/2
02
3:40
12/15
02
3/4
02
3:20
12/23
02
1*
F
02
3:20
12/28
02
3**
3/4
01
3:30
1/5
02
3/4
02
3:30
1/11
02
1/2
02
3:25
1/19
02
3/4
02
3:30
1/28
02
F
02
3:30
2/3
02
F
02
3:30
2/9
02
4 * *
F
02
3:30
2/19
02
3/4
02
3:25
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
~~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
B-7
-------
TABLE B-7. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 07
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/10
02
15*
1/2
02
--
3:15
11/18
01
1/2
01
5* ~
3:30
11/25
01
3/4
01
3:10
11/30
01
1/4
01
5* *~
3:30
12/10
02
1/4
02
3:00
12/17
01
01
3:25
12/21
01
01
3:15
12/29
01
1/4
01
3:15
1/6
01
02
4***
3:15
1/12
01
01
3:05
1/28
01
1/2
01
2***
3:05
2/10
02
~
1/4
02
3:25
2/15
02
7 +
3/4
02
3:15
2/24
01
1/2
01
3:20
2/29
01
1/2
01
3:15
Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No accessories
operating.
**Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving forward in line, A/C operating.
***Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
+Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
B-8
-------
TABLE B-8. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 08
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/18
01
1/2
01
3:40
11/24
02
1/2
02
3:45
11/30
02
1/8
02
3:15
12/8
02
5/8
02
3:25
12/14
02
--
3/8
02
3:25
12/23
02
3/8
02
3:15
12/31
01
1/2
01
3:25
1/7
01
1/2
01
3:25
1/11
02
1/8
02
3:25
1/19
02
5/8
02
3:30
1/28
01
1/4
01
3:15
2/3
02
2*
E
02
3:25
2/10
02
1/2
02
3:15
2/15
02
4*
1/8
02
3:35
2/23
01
E
01
3:15
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessory
operating.
B-9
-------
TABLE B-9. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO.09
Waiting Waiting
Analyzer Period Fuel Analyzer Period Soak
Test No. AM Test, Gauge No. Noon Test, Period
Date AM Test Min. Reading Noon Test Min. Hr:Min.
11/19
02
3/4
02
3:30
11/23
02
-
1/2
02
3:40
12/1
02
E
02
3:10
12/9
02
3/8
02
3:15
12/17
01
F
01
3:25
12/21
02
02
4:00
12/30
01
F
01
3:15
1/5
02
1/2
02
3:25
1/13
02
1/2
02
3:10
1/18
01
2*
1/8
01
3:55
1/26
01
6*
5/8
01
3:20
2/2
01
1/4
01
3:25
2/9
02
7*
7/8
02
3:30
2/17
02
1/4
02
3:10
2/25
01
3/8
01
3:15
*Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
**Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-10
-------
TABLE B-10. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 10
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
HrsMin.
11/11
01
F
02
3:45
11/16
02
F
02
3:40
11/24
02
1/2
02
3:55
12/1
02
1/2
02
3:40
12/10
02
F
02
4:20
12/14
02
1/2
02
3:25
12/21
02
~
3/4
02
3:45
12/30
02
1/2
02
3:30
1/7
02
1/4
02
3:25
1/12
01
1/4
01
3:25
1/20
01
F
01
3:40
1/27
02
F
02
3:40
2/4
02
1*
F
02
3:55
2/9
02
1/4
02
3:25
2/15
02
1/2
02
3:25
~Waiting condition not recorded.
B-U
-------
TABLE B-ll. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 11
Waiting
Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
11/12
02
1/2
02
11/16
01
1/4
01
11/25
01
1/4
01
12/1
02
1/2
02
12/11
02
1/4
02
12/14
02
1/4
02
12/21
02
__
1/4
02
__
1/5
01
1/2
01
1/13
02
1/4
02
1/21
02
1/2
02
1/27
01
1/2
01
2/2
02
1/4
01
2/12
02
1/4
02
2/18
02
1/2
02
2/22
02
5**
1/4
01
Soak
Period
HrrMin.
2:55*
3:45
3:55
3:30
3:15
3:15
3:20
3:35
3:25
3:40
3:45
3:20
3:50
3:40
3:55***
*Soak period inadvertently 5 minutes short.
**Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
~ ~~Vehicle was operated after AM test, soaked 3 hours and 55 minutes, and tested
at 2:25 PM.
B-12
-------
TABLE B-12. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 12
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Readine
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/12
02
1/4
02
4:00
11/17
01
1/2
01
3:40
11/25
02
1/2
02
4:25
11/30
*
1/4
~
4:15
12/8
02
1/2
02
4:35
12/14
02
1/8
02
3:30
12/23
01
1/4
01
4:05
12/31
01
1/4
01
4:15
1/6
01
1/8
01
3:45
1/11
01
3/4
01
3:40
1/19
01
1/4
01
3:55
1/28
01
1/2
01
3:20
2/1
02
1/4
02
3:35
2/9
02
1/8
02
4:45
2/17
02
1/2
02
4:40
~Analyzer number not available.
B-13
-------
TABLE B-13. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 13
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/10
01
F
01
4:00
11/24
02
1/2
02
3:45
12/3
01
7/8
01
3:50
12/7
01
02
3:50
12/16
02
3/4
02
3:35
12/22
02
10*
F
02
3:30
12/28
02
7/8
02
3:35
1/5
01
F
01
3:50
1/13
02
1/2
02
~
3:30
1/20
01
F
01
3:50
1/25
01
1/2
01
3:40
1/28
02
F
01
3:20
~Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No accessories
operating.
B-14
-------
TABLE B-14. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 14
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min,
11/12
01
01
3:00
11/17
02
1/3
02
3:40
11.23
01
F
01
3:25
12/2
01
1/4
01
3:25
12/8
02
3/4
02
3:05
12/16
01
1/4
01
4:30*
12/22
01
3/4
01
3:40
12/28
01
1/8
01
3:45
1/4
01
3/4
01
3:20
1/13
01
1/4
01
3:15
1/21
01
3/4
01
3:20
1/28
02
1/4
02
3L10
2/1
02
F
02
3:30
2/10
02
1/4
02
3:15
2/19
02
3/4
02
3:45
*PM Test conducted at 12:49 PM.
B-15
-------
TABLE B-15. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO.I5
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/11
02
1*
1/2
02
3:55
11/17
02
3/4
02
3:40
11/25
02
1/2
02
3:35
12/3
02
5*
F
02
3:35
12/7
02
4*
1/2
02
4:30**
12/16
01
3/4
01
5:25**
12/23
01
1/4
01
3:10
12/29
02
1/4
02
3:30
1/4
02
1/2
02
2*
3:25
1/14
01
1/2
01
3:30
1/19
02
1/2
02
3:25
1/25
02
2*
F
02
3:35
2/9
02
1/4
02
4:00
2/15
02
8*
1/4
02
--
3:45
2/25
01
1/2
01
3:10
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
**PM test conducted at 12:30 PM
**PM test conducted at 1:26 PM
B-16
-------
TABLE B-16. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 16
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
HrsMin.
11/12
01
3/4
01
4*
3:45
11/18
01
3**
3/4
01
3:55
11/24
01
1/4
01
3:45
11/30
02
--
3/4
02
3:30
12/7
01
1/4
02
4:05
12/17
01
3/4
01
3:25
12/22
02
1/4
02
5*
3:30
1/6
01
F
01
3:40
1/12
01
3/4
01
3:25
1/21
01
1/4
01
3:30
1/25
01
1/2
01
3:55
2/2
02
1/4
02
4:00
2/10
02
1/2
02
4:25
2/16
02
2**
3/4
02
--
3:55
2/22
02
1/4
02
3:20
~Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No accessories
operating.
**Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-17
-------
TABLE B-17. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 17
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
HrtMin,
11/13
10 +
3/4
3:05
11/18
02
--
3/4
02
3:30
11/23
02
1/4
02
3:40
11/30
02
1/2
02
3:10
12/8
02
F
02
3:55
12/17
02
1/4
02
3:20
12/23
02
3/4
02
3:20
12/30
02
1/2
02
3:15
1/5
02
1/4
02
3:25
1/11
02
1/2
02
3:30
1/20
02
1/2
02
3:10
1/26
02
5**
1/4
02
3:35
2/5
02
1/2
02
3:30
2/11
02
F
02
3:30
2/18
02
F
02
3:40
~Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No accessories
operating.
~~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-18
-------
TABLE B-18. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 18
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
HrsMin.
11/10
01
9*
1/4
01
3:30
11/18
01
F
01
4:30
11/23
01
1/2
01
3:40
12/1
01
5/8
01
3:35
12/9
02
1/8
02
3:35
12/16
01
1/2
01
3:05
12/22
01
1/4
01
3:55
12/28
01
1/4
01
4:05
1/7
01
3/8
01
3:35
1/14
02
5/8
02
3:35
1/18
01
3/4
01
3:45
1/27
02
1/2
01
4:00
2/4
02
5/8
02
3:20
2/9
02
3/4
02
3:20
2/18
02
F
02
3:40
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-19
-------
TABLE B-19.
SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION -
VEHICLE NO.
19
Waiting Waiting
Analyzer Period Fuel Analyzer Period Soak
Test No. AM Test, Gauge No. Noon Test, Period
Date AM Test Min. Reading Noon Test Min. Hr:Min.
11/12
01
1/4
01
11/16
01
1/2
01
11/23
02
1/8
02
12/2
01
1/4
01
12/8
02
1/4
02
12/17
01
1/2
01
12/21
02
1/4
02
12/30
01
1/2
01
1/5
01
1/8
01
1/13
01
1/4
01
1/21
02 3*
1/2
02
1/26
01
1/4
01
2/1
02 3*
1/2
02
2/9
02
1/4
02
2/19
02
1/8
02
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward
operating.
3:55
3:45
3:40
3:15
3:50
3:30
3:45
4:00
3:50
3:20
3:50
3:40
3:30
3:25
3:35
B-20
-------
TABLE B-20. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 20
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min,
11/13
02
5/8
02
1*
3:30
11/16
01
1/8
01
~
3:50
12/1
01
1/4
01
3:40
12/9
02
1/4
02
3:40
12/15
02
1/8
02
3:10
12/23
01
1/8
01
3:15
12/31
01
F
01
3:30
1/4
01
1/2
01
3:40
1/14
01
3/8
01
3:35
1/18
01
F
01
2*
3:35
1/27
02
1*
F
02
3:25
2/5
02
1/8
02
3:30
2/11
02
02
3:30
2/17
02
F
02
3*
3:25
2/26
01
7/8
01
3:20
~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-21
-------
TABLE B-21.
SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION -
VEHICLE NO. 21
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Readme
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
11/24
01
1/2
01
12/7
02
3/4
02
12/29
02
1/4
02
1/7
02
F
02
1/14
02
2*
F
02
1/19
01
1/2
01
1/25
02
2*
1/8
02
~
2/5
02
5*
1/4
02
2/8
02
1/4
02
--
2/12
02
F
02
2/15
02
1/2
02
2/19
02
F
02
2/23
01
01
2/26
01
1/2
01
2/29
01
F
01
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
3;35
3:05
3:20
3:25
3:35
3:05**
3:20
3:35
3:20
3:00***
3:50
3:15
3:10
3:15
3:25
*Primarily engine off. Restarted and advanced in line as necessary. No accessories
operating.
**AM test conducted at 5:06 AM, test after soak conducted at 8:13 AM.
~ ~~Vehicle was operated after test, soaked for 3 hours, and tested at 2:31 PM.
B-22
-------
TABLE B-22. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 22
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
W aiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/10
01
3*
1/2
01
3:40
11/19
01
1/2
01
3:20
11/24
01
3/4
01
3:55
12/2
01
1/4
01
4:10
12/10
02
1/4
02
4:20
12/14
02
10*
3/4
02
3:40
12/23
01
1/2
01
3:10
1/6
01
1/2
01
3:40
1/12
02
7/8
02
3:40
1/18
02
5*
3/4
02
4:00
1/25
01
3/4
01
3:30
2/4
02
9**
3/4
02
4:05
2/12
02
1/4
02
4:00
2/19
02
3/4
02
3:25
2/24
01
1/4
01
.
3:20
Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
~~Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. Heater operating.
B-23
-------
TABLE B-23. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 23
Waiting Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/11
01
3/4
01
3:40
11/19
01
3/4
01
__
3:50
11/24
01
3/4
01
4:00
11/30
01
3/4
01
3:45
12/11
02
5/8
02
3:45
12/15
02
1/2
02
4:15
12/21
01
3/4
01
3:45
12/30
01
1/4
01
3:35
1/6
01
1/2
01
3:45
1/14
01
1/2
01
4:15
1/19
01
1/2
01
3:45
1/27
02
1/4
02
3:50
2/2
01
3/4
01
3:30
2/12
02
3/4
02
3:50
2/15
02
1/2
02
3:30
B-24
-------
TABLE B-24. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION - VEHICLE NO. 24
Waiting
Waiting
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
11/17
01
F
01
11/23
01
1/4
01
12/2
02
1/2
02
12/11
02
1/8
02
12/16
02
1/2
02
12/22
01
F
01
12/28
01
3/4
01
1/7
01
1/8
01
5**
1/14
01
3/8
01
1/20
01
3/4
01
1/26
02
4**
1/8
02
2/4
02
11**
1/4
02
2/12
02
6**
F
02
2/16
02
3**
1/2
02
2/22
02
5/8
02
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
4:00
3:35
3:45
3:40
5:50*
4:05
3:20
3:30
3:45
3:30
3:25
3:40
3:55
3:20
3:25
*PM test conducted at 1:54 PM.
* ^Primarily idle-in-drive except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-25
-------
TABLE B-25. SUMMARY OF TEST INFORMATION -
VEHICLE NO. 25
Test
Date
Analyzer
No.
AM Test
Waiting
Period
AM Test,
Min.
Fuel
Gauge
Reading
Analyzer
No.
Noon Test
Waiting
Period
Noon Test,
Min.
Soak
Period
Hr:Min.
11/13
01
~
1/4
01
5*
3:45
11/17
01
5*
1/4
01
3:25
12/3
01
1/2
01
3:35
12/7
02
F
02
3:30
12/15
02
4*
3/4
02
3:25
12/22
01
1/2
01
3:30
12/28
02
3/4
02
3:35
1/8
01
1/4
01
3:20
1/13
01
1/4
01
3:30
1/21
02
1/2
02
3:50
1/28
02
3/4
02
3:15
2/3
01
F
01
3:40
2/10
02
3*
F
02
3:25
2/16
02
1/2
02
3:25
2/26
01
1/4
01
3:20
*Primarily idle-in-neutral except when moving forward in line. No accessories
operating.
B-26
-------
APPENDIX C
ENGINE AND EXHAUST MAINTENANCE AND
ANALYZER COMMENTS
-------
TABLE C-l. ENGINE AND EXHAUST MAINTENANCE AND ANALYZER
OPERATOR COMMENTS
Vehicle #1
11/16/87 - Replaced water pump which involved removing drive belt from air
pump and alternator and reinstalling belts after water pump was
replaced.
12/3/87 - Added 1 quart of water to cooling system.
2/25/88 - Added 2 quarts of oil.
Vehicle #2
1/6/88 - Added oil. Replaced water pump and spark plugs.
Vehicle #3
1/26/88 - Oil Change - Pennzoil 10W-30, 5 quarts.
Vehicle #4
Ho maintenance done.
Vehicle #5
11/18/88 - Car stalled as it was pulled into stall. Immediate restart and
proceeded as normal.
Vehicle #6
12/7/87 - Oil change.
12/28/87 - After first 2500 rpm test, had to depress gas pedal slightly to bring
rpm below 1300 rpm.
Vehicle #7
1/6/88 - Changed oil and filter.
Vehicle #8
12/23/87 - Oil change.
2/15/88 - Repalced radiator.
Vehicle #9
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #10
1/5/88 - Replaced core.
1/8/88 - Replaced fuel pump relay.
C-2
-------
TABLE C-l (CONT'D). ENGINE AND EXHAUST MAINTENANCE AND ANALYZER
OPERATOR COMMENTS
Vehicle #11
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #12
1/19/88 - Changed belts.
1/28/88 - Added 1 quart oil.
Vehicle #13
1/20/88 - Oil and filter change.
Vehicle #14
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #15
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #16
2/16/88 - Changed 1 spark plug and spark plug wires.
Vehicle #17
11/18/87 - Oil and filter change.
Vehicle #18
12/1/87 - Changed freeze plugs.
Vehicle #19
11/16/87 - 1 quart oil added.
1/26/88 - Oil change, new air filter, new fluid in rear axle.
Vehicle #20
12/1/87 - Added 1/2 quart oil at 7,771 miles.
1/14/88 - Oil change and filter.
Vehicle #21
12/2/87 - Oil change.
1/7/88 - Oil change; replaced water pump.
1/25/88 - Crack repaired in tailpipe.
C-3
-------
TABLE C-l (CONT'D). ENGINE AND EXHAUST MAINTENANCE AND ANALYZER
OPERATOR COMMENTS
Vehicle #22
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #23
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #24
No maintenance done.
Vehicle #25
2/3/88 - Added 1 quart of oil.
C-4
-------
APPENDIX D
I/M TEST RESULTS
Vehicle
Table D-
No.
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Olds mobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 318i
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
-------
TABLE D-l.
TEST ODOMETER
DATE (MILES)
11/13/97 41429
11/16/87 4l52b
11/25/07 41753
12/ 3/87 419%
12/17/87 42243
12/22/87 42355
12/30/87 42636
1/ 4/88 42846
..lu/53 43075
1/13/88 43259
1/27/88 43534
2/ 9/88 43346
2/17/88 441OS
2/25/88 44394
2/29/68 44522
MAKE MERCURY
TRANSMISSION fl-3
VIN 1MEBP71B7CK632918
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 01
MODEL ZEPHYR
MODEL YR 1982
ENG DISP 3.3 L
ENG FAMILY CFM3.3V1GXF9
MORNINS TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPK
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPH MODE
IDLE
MODE
ฃ500
RPM MODE
IDLE
NODE
HC CO HC CO
m PCT PPM PCT
HC CO HC CO
PPM PCT PPM PCT
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE ฃ500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
AFTER ฃ500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
HC CO HC CO HC CO HC CO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
19
.00
71
.00
9
.00
71
.00
77
.11
207
.03
15
.00
132
.00
67
.18
278
2.58
15
.00
132
.00
26
.00
85
.00
15
.00
82
.00
27
.*(. i
84
.00
14
.00
89
.00
18
.00
84
.00
14
.00
77
. QO
21
.00
89
.00
9
.00
72
.00
57
.00
77
.00
13
.00
68
.00
16
. 00
100
.00
8
.00
77
.00
18
.00
83
.00
10
.00
77
.00
i l
.00
111
.00
7
.00
75
.00
42
.01
75
.00
9
.00
75
.00
13
.00
90
.00
4
.00
78
.00
39
.01
92
.00
6
.00
87
.00
-j
i
. 00
65
.00
3
.00
72
.00
27
.00
79
.00
7
.00
72
.00
57
.05
240
1.72
8
.00
115
.00
28
.00
104
.00
11
.00
77
.00
22
.00
165
,07
4
.00
98
.00
21
.00
89
.00
4
.00
74
.00
9
.00
62
,00
5
.00
60
.00
13
.00
60
.01
9
.00
68
.00
11
.01
70
.00
5
.00
78
.00
32
.00
95
.00
9
.00
80
.00
17
.00
68
.00
6
.00
75
.00
30
.00
137
.00
7
.00
79
.00
ฆuC.
.03
237
1.35
J
L.
.00
83
.00
23
.03
88
.01
6
.00
72
.00
lb
.00
b9
.00
6
.00
75
.00
44
.03
48
.01
8
.00
72
.00
D-2
-------
TABLE D-2.
MAKE
TRANSMISSION
VIN
PROJECT VEHICLE NO
DODSE
fl-3
1B4GD12W4ES367521
OS
MODEL
MODEL YR
ENG DISP
EN6 FAMILY
RAMCHARGER
1384
5.9 L
ECR5.9T4B4F9
MORNING TESTS AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
25C0 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CD
HC
CC
DATE
(MILES)
PPK
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
ti/12/87
33101
9
.00
14
.00
a
.00
12
.00
56
1.20
42
.74
10
.00
13
.00
11/18/87
33234
10
.00
13
.00
6
.00
8
.00
76
1.24
60
1.12
8
.00
11
.00
11/24/87
3333C
5
.00
11
.00
3
.00
5
.00
72
1.47
49
.87
7
.00
9
.00
11/30/87
33482
4
.00
14
.00
5
.00
6
.00
57
1.40
51
1.01
8
.00
10
.00
12/ 3/87
33720
10
.00
18
.00
7
.00
11
.00
35
.68
46
.92
11
.00
13
.00
12/15/87
33871
10
.00
15
.00
7
.00
3
.00
39
1.00
34
.51
8
.00
10
.00
1/ 6/88
36315
25
.01
23
.00
25
.00
28
.00
48
.50
47
.09
20
.00
28
.00
1/11/88
36412
17
.06
34
.00
20
.04
33
.00
34
.34
35
.01
23
.03
32
.00
1/21/88
36641
3
.05
52
.01
31
.05
44
.00
68
.37
48
.04
33
.03
34
.00
1/26/88
36764
32
.03
40
.00
30
.02
25
.00
55
.06
35
.00
27
.01
28
.CO
2/ 3/88
36902
28
.05
35
.00
28
.03
30
.00
47
.73
43
.09
33
.03
27
.00
2/ 8/88
37028
49
.03
24
.00
54
.01
24
.00
48
.53
31
.06
32
.00
31
.00
2/16/86
37244
IS
.05
35
.00
ฃ5
.02
24
.00
55
.16
&
.01
33
.02
25
.00
c/26/88
37486
C/; -
J.'C
.04
31
.00
222
.02
22
.00
383
.46
33
.07
505
.02
27
.00
2/29/88
37559
553
.04
34
.00
174
.01
26
.00
526
.92
42
.18
469
.02
25
.00
D-3
-------
TABLE D-3.
HAKE OLDSMOBILE MODEL DELTA 88
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1984
VIN 1G3AN69Y4EX393534 ENG DISP 5.0 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 03 ENG FAMILY E3G5.0V4NLAX
MORNING TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
NODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/11/87
40931
28
.00
21
.00
16
.00
16
.00
150
1.79
124
.02
17
.00
21
.00
11/16/87
41214
60
.11
62
.00
16
.00
16
.00
37
.00
71
.00
19
.29
87
.21
11/24/87
41650
35
.00
29
.00
32
.37
29
.02
177
2.49
83
.03
24
.00
19
.00
12/ 3/87
42037
28
.00
31
.00
16
.00
20
.00
40
.08
86
.02
163
3.91
17
.02
12/ 7/87
42184
41
.00
33
.00
15
.00
15
.00
126
1.21
94
.00
10
.34
14
.00
12/16/87
42636
35
.00
27
.00
14
.00
14
.00
108
.46
62
.00
16
.00
12
.00
12/21/87
43012
28
.00
23
.00
12
.00
38
.02
38
.00
35
.00
5
.25
9
.01
12/29/87
43440
26
.00
28
.00
11
.00
17
.02
18
.00
41
.00
22
.34
106
.25
1/ 7/88
43951
26
.00
27
.00
17
.00
16
.00
197
.56
69
.00
17
.00
13
.00
1/13/88
44370
25
.00
37
.00
15
.00
40
.06
4
.00
12
.00
5
.23
47
.10
1/18/88
44700
30
.00
38
.00
11
.34
17
.00
136
.74
10B
.00
16
.00
18
.00
1/26/88
45260
22
.00
26
.00
5
.31
93
.34
14
.00
37
.00
139
3.36
313
1.35
2/ 4/88
45900
71
.20
59
.00
11
.28
29
.13
65
1.02
278
1.22
15
.23
4
.OB
2/12/88
46575
25
.00
19
.00
9
.41
18
.02
9
.00
15
.00
7
.31
22
.13
2/18/88
46950
29
.00
20
.00
59
1.26
10
.02
112
3.82
231
1.51
9
.00
10
.00
D-4
-------
TABLE D-4.
MAKE CHEVROLET MODEL SILVERADO
TRANSMISSION A-3 MODEL YR 1985
VIN 1GCDC14H2FS120801 ENG DISP 5.0 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO OA ENG FAMILY F1G5.7T4HHC0
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
ฃ500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
WIDE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CG
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/11/87
30829
4
.00
3
.00
3
.00
3
.00
39
.24
67
.05
1
.00
1
.00
11/19/87
30815
2
.00
1
.00
3
.00
2
.00
30
.22
50
.04
3
.00
.00
11/23/37
30887
4
.50
2
.00
2
.00
0
.00
50
.24
56
.02
0
.00
0
.00
12/ 1/87
31137
1
i
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
42
.35
34
.01
1
.00
0
.00
12/11/87
31347
8
.00
7
.00
5
.00
4
.00
44
.42
74
.02
6
.00
11
.00
12/16/87
31430
C
J
.00
3
.00
3
.00
3
.00
20
.13
18
.01
6
.00
5
.00
12/21/87
31530
3
.00
2
.00
1
.00
1
.00
22
.10
30
.01
0
.oc-
0
.00
1/ 5/88
31853
i
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
38
.11
47
.02
0
.00
0
.00
1/14/88
32037
8
.00
8
.00
5
.00
5
.00
43
.09
48
ru
o
6
.00
5
.00
1/19/88
32130
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
30
.24
33
OJ
o
1
.00
0
.00
1/27/88
322%
ฃ
.00
6
.00
5
.00
6
.00
51
.14
88
.04
e;
.00
5
.00
2/ 1/88
32402
9
.01
9
.00
5
.00
5
.00
45
.34
85
Oc
6
.00
5
.00
2/11/88
32605
7
.00
6
.00
4
.00
3
.00
33
.09
30
.01
4
.00
4
.00
2/17/88
32728
6
.00
6
.00
4
.00
3
.00
45
.26
80
.03
3
.00
2
.00
2/23/88
32902
4
.00
6
.00
2
.00
2
.00
43
.13
53
.02
3
.00
3
.00
D-5
-------
TABLE D-5.
MAKE HONDA MODEL CIVIC
TRANSMISSION MODEL YR 1381
VIN JHMSL4310BSC13641 ENG DISP 1.3 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 05 ENS FAMILY 3HN1.3V3fifi5
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
3EFCRE ฃ500 SPM
CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE
m MCDE MODE
AFTER 2500 RPK
CONDITIONING
BEFORE ฃ500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
ฃ500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
ฃ50 0
RPK MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
ซ... -
-
'
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
i -r>
HL
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
r-.n
L"w
hC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
Dk . i. (MILES)
PPM
r'CT
PCT
PR".
PCT
PPM
pnT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
r.fr
r W ;
PPM
PCT
11/10/87 77152
18
.00
2
.00
4
.00
1
i
.00
73
.16
33
.04
13
.00
4
.00
11/18/87 77303
11
.00
ฃ
.00
r
,00
0
u
.00
125
.17
129
.04
8
.00
3
.00
11/23/87 773ฃ;
]
, v ^
.00
6
.00
u
.00
147
.23
146
.06
"7
/
,00
4
.00
12/ 2/87 77520
10
.00
5
.00
ฃ
.00
2
.00
71
.25
119
.05
8
.00
3
.00
12/10/37 77636
* o
.00
4
.00
5
.00
c!
.00
85
.22
152
.08
8
.00
6
.00
12/17/87 77800
.00
c
W
.00
5
.00
3
.00
113
.31
141
.07
8
.00
3
.00
12/2-3/87 77235
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
201
3.27
121
.08
4
.00
0
.00
1/ 4/83 77330
7
.00
J
.00
5
. 00
2
.00
826
3.77
227
.18
1!
.00
5
.00
1/12/88 78051
8
.00
7
.00
.00
L
.00
127
.47
188
.09
6
.00
4
.00
1/20/88 78330
11
.00
5
.00
3
.00
3
00
455
3.30
131
.15
8
.00
5
b
. 00
i/ฃ-/33 78539
* X
, CO
0
. t.'i./
er
J
.00
J
.00
c?
U '
.28
187
i /.
ซ IV
8
.00
4
.00
i/38 73730
16
.00
6
.oc
k
.00
n
C
.00
532
3.27
332
5.50
12
.00
W
.00
2/ 3/88 78770
8
. CO
4
.00
3
.00
1
.00
122
1.62
ฃ01
.12
&
.00
ฃ
.00
2/16/88 78905
. 00
4
.00
4
.00
tl
.00
110
.81
:Si
.08
8
.00
4
.00
dn-4/d3 73Ujti
.00
. 00
d
.00
0
.00
77
.25
i cm
luU
.08
3
.00
o
.00
D-6
-------
33890
34149
34272
34480
34508
34699
3499B
35109
35348
35443
35607
35742
36160
36264
36442
TABLE D-6.
HAKE HONDA MODEL ACCORD
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1985
VIN JHMAD5429FC081751 ENG DISP 1.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 06 ENG FAMILY FHN1.8V3FXF5
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM NODE
IDLE
MODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
PM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
1
.00
9
.00
0
.00
5
.00
167
2.22
198
.12
3
.00
10
.00
1
.00
7
.00
0
.00
4
.00
97
1.91
88
.02
3
.00
9
.00
1
.00
6
.00
1
.00
4
.00
115
3.36
34
.00
3
.00
8
.00
I
.00
7
.00
1
.00
5
.00
112
3.00
258
.17
1
.00
8
.00
2
.00
7
.00
0
.00
3
.00
106
2.62
251
.18
2
.00
8
.00
1
.00
7
.00
1
.00
5
.00
107
2.73
19
.00
3
.00
9
.00
2
.00
6
.00
1
.00
3
.00
59
.56
29
.00
1
.00
6
.00
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
127
3.10
48
.01
0
.00
8
.00
2
.00
7
.00
0
.00
3
.00
126
3.20
33
.00
3
.00
11
.00
1
.00
7
.00
0
.00
4
.00
111
2.74
37
.00
3
.00
8
.00
1
.00
6
.00
0
.00
3
.00
48
.55
83
.00
3
.00
7
.00
3
.00
9
.00
0
.00
3
.00
109
2.82
38
.01
3
.00
10
.00
2
.00
7
.00
0
.00
3
.00
106
2.45
170
.09
3
.00
11
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
3
.00
122
3.12
16
.00
2
.00
7
.00
1
.00
6
.00
0
.00
3
.00
116
2.63
221
.21
1
.00
7
.00
D-7
-------
TABLE D-7.
MAKE JEEP MODEL
TRANSMISSION fl-4 MODEL YR
VIN 1JCMU7427HT031944 ENG DISP
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 07 ENG FAMII
MORNING TESTS
BEFORE ฃ500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
CHEROKEE
1987
4.0 L
HAM4.0T5LAB9
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
ฃ500 IDLE ฃ500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE MODE RPM MODE MODE RPM MODE MODE RPM WIDE MODE
TEST 1
DDOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/10/87
NR*
1
.00
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
7
.07
12
.01
0
.00
0
.00
11/18/87
13156
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
11/25/87
13502
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
11/30/87
13728
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
2
.05
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12/10/87
14115
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
5
.02
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12/17/87
14423
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
10
.07
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12/21/87
14605
o
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
6
.06
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12/29/87
14976
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12
.09
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1/ 6/88
15350
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1/12/88
15645
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
3
.05
5
.01
0
.00
0
.00
1/28/88
16004
o
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.04
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
2/10/88
16528
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
7
.04
13
.01
0
.00
0
.00
2/15/38
16817
3
w
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
8
.05
10
.01
0
.00
0
.00
2/24/88
17331
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
2/29/88
17661
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
8
.06
14
.02
0
.00
0
.00
* Not Recorded
D-8
-------
74727
74960
75064
75161
75238
75525
75785
76000
76111
76206
76319
76416
76551
766%
76743
TABLE D-8.
MAKE PEUGEOT
TRANSMISSION M-5
VIN VF3BA11F5CS322565
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 08
MODEL 505
MODEL YR 1982
ENG DISP 2.0 L
ENG FAMILY CPE2.0V6FAB3
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
NODE
c
CO
HC
CO
HC
CG
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
>M
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
47
.45
104
.03
0
.01
0
.00
1
.00
3
.00
0
.03
2
.07
32
.43
60
.01
3
.01
7
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
32
.38
72
.02
0
.03
1
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
33
.59
112
.07
3
.02
6
.00
1
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
33
.29
67
.04
3
.01
4
.00
1
.00
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
27
.33
86
.02
2
.01
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.01
0
.00
40
.98
88
.12
0
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
30
.12
47
.01
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
34
.13
130
.02
3
.01
4
.00
1
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
33
.48
82
.02
3
.01
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
21
.54
102
.05
0
.01
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
28
.19
143
.02
1
.03
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
35
.23
83
.03
0
.00
2
.00
1
.00
3
.00
0
.01
1
.00
23
.31
51
.06
0
.02
1
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.02
0
.01
29
.52
41
.06
0
.00
0
.00
D-9
-------
TABLE D-9.
MAKE V0LKSWA6EN MODEL GOLF
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1985
VIN 1VWFA0179FV032893 EN6 DISP 1.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 09 EN6 FAMILY FVW1.8V6FAF6
HORNING TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
NODE
RPM NODE
MODE
RPM NODE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/19/87
26968
0
.00
2
.03
55
3.44
6
.04
5
.01
14
.13
0
.00
4
.07
11/23/87
27051
2
.14
56
1.60
12
.58
39
.86
11
.06
22
.08
1
.00
5
.06
12/ 1/87
27166
19
1.86
3
.03
63
3.90
6
.04
22
.12
22
.05
1
.00
3
.03
12/ 9/87
27418
51
2.87
11
.16
76
5.42
9
.09
12
.09
20
.09
1
.00
6
.11
12/17/87
27530
33
1.98
3
.07
3
.31
2
.05
15
.10
13
.04
0
.00
2
.12
12/21/87
27670
0
.00
3
.04
50
2.68
8
.06
17
.11
26
.10
2
.02
128
6.85
12/30/87
27879
1
.14
5
.09
57
3.91
3
.05
18
.13
27
.11
0
.02
78
3.07
1/ 5/88
28099
65
3.73
11
.06
77
5.10
11
.04
20
.10
22
.05
1
.00
5
.09
1/13/88
28346
19
1.21
4
.02
68
3.99
7
.02
28
.14
23
.03
21
1.02
101
3.93
1/18/88
28475
8
.57
64
1.87
67
3.81
24
.48
22
.17
22
.06
0
.01
102
4.32
1/28/88
28650
2
.41
6
.08
8
.66
1
.02
16
.21
16
.04
0
.01
81
3.34
2/ 2/88
28757
0
.01
1
.02
76
4.44
7
.02
22
.15
11
.04
14
1.18
130
6.04
2/ 9/88
28935
37
1.96
18
.15
62
3.29
12
.09
67
.20
28
.06
0
.00
3
.06
2/17/88
29128
22
1.08
16
.21
72
3.85
9
.05
23
.13
27
.05
12
.62
65
1.94
2/25/88
29427
13
.70
a
.08
59
2.65
7
.08
28
.17
32
.11
0
.02
28
.44
D-10
-------
30335
305%
30764
31011
31463
31634
31847
32194
32464
32717
32974
33265
33527
33705
33358
TABLE D-10.
MAKE BMW MODEL 3181
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1985
VIN WBAAC740XF0681496 ENG DISP 1.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 10 ENG FAMILY FBM1.8V5FAB5
N0RNIN6 TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM NODE
IDLE
NODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CQ
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
13
.32
0
.00
26
.67
0
.00
154
1.25
205
.32
65
.78
8
.00
53
.64
2
.00
50
.93
2
.00
156
1.21
220
.58
48
.50
6
.00
73
.97
5
.00
81
1.24
5
.00
133
1.26
219
.34
81
1.03
12
.01
73
1.12
2
.00
74
1.52
3
.01
164
1.65
189
.58
94
1.41
9
.01
41
.95
1
.00
39
.97
1
.00
162
1.57
181
.68
63
.81
e
.00
35
1.05
1
.00
70
1.34
4
.01
177
1.75
187
.69
86
1.12
li
.01
40
1.08
2
.01
80
2.05
3
.01
176
1.70
178
.56
75
.83
9
.00
116
1.78
61
.35
75
1.28
21
.25
163
1.92
203
.76
92
1.37
9
.01
109
1.12
108
.64
90
1.21
112
.74
196
1.78
247
.37
135
1.44
159
.50
87
1.01
8
.11
98
1.44
8
.11
195
1.13
261
.36
90
.81
8
.01
24
.91
0
.00
72
1.22
0
.00
205
1.45
228
.27
72
.36
3
.00
78
1.03
0
.02
100
1.49
1
.03
186
.98
239
.30
53
.35
0
.00
22
.42
2
.00
115
1.30
4
.01
279
1.88
337
.31
114
.76
11
.00
53
.50
0
.00
40
.72
0
.00
212
1.53
282
.36
98
.74
9
.00
81
1.18
2
.00
%
1.36
3
.01
190
1.32
244
.30
111
1.14
10
.01
D-ll
-------
18341
16491
18782
18955
19336
19435
19615
20060
20326
20564
20738
20895
21189
21392
21520
TABLE D-ll.
MAKE NISSAN MODEL PULSAR
TRANSMISSION A-3 NODEL YR 1986
VIN JNIMN24S8GM015782 ENG DISP 1.6 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 11 ENG FAMILY GNS1.6V9HAFX
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
NODE
RPM MODE
NODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
F>M
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
5
.00
4
.00
2
.00
3
.00
10
.00
8
.00
4
.00
3
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
38
1.00
3
.01
1
.00
1
.00
1
.01
1
.00
0
.01
0
.00
15
.31
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
4
.00
3
.00
2
.00
2
.00
10
.00
7
.01
6
.00
6
.00
5
.02
4
.00
1
.00
0
.00
28
.40
8
.00
6
.00
5
.00
7
.00
3
.00
3
.00
2
.00
8
.00
7
.00
4
.01
3
.00
2
.00
3
.00
1
.00
1
.00
6
.01
6
.00
3
.00
4
.00
0
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
238
6.79
205
2.09
0
.00
0
.00
6
.07
5
.00
1
.00
1
.00
10
.00
9
.00
0
.02
0
.00
2
.00
3
.00
1
.00
0
.00
7
.00
7
.00
4
.00
3
.00
0
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.03
0
.00
0
.06
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12
.00
13
.00
2
.02
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
,00
7
.00
10
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
7
.06
6
.00
0
.00
1
.00
6
.00
5
.00
0
.01
0
.00
10
.03
23
.10
0
.01
0
.00
D-12
-------
61662
620*4
62348
62461
62669
62636
62939
63316
63546
63722
63975
64424
64517
64682
64915
TABLE D-12.
MAKE CHEVROLET MODEL SUBURBAN
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1984
VIN 168EC16L6EF148544 ENB DISP 5.7 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 12 ENB FAMILY E165.7T4HHCX
MORNING TESTS AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE
NODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM NODE
MODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
41
.00
15
.00
15
.00
6
.00
13
.00
11
.00
11
.00
6
.00
16
.00
13
.00
9
.00
1
.00
47
.17
77
.14
7
.00
5
.00
34
.00
20
.00
16
.00
8
.00
23
.08
57
.04
28
.00
10
.00
20
.00
15
.00
10
.00
8
.00
163
.10
82
.15
12
.00
10
.00
18
.00
21
.00
12
.00
7
.00
47
.09
65
.06
10
.00
8
.00
15
.00
17
.00
8
.00
8
.00
31
.02
50
.04
7
.00
8
.00
12
.00
16
.00
7
.00
3
.00
61
.06
73
.09
10
.00
3
.00
16
.00
14
.00
9
.00
3
.00
27
.39
30
.03
10
.00
4
.00
25
.00
11
.00
7
.00
1
.00
123
.13
66
.23
3
.00
3
.00
53
.00
24
.00
11
.00
0
.00
102
.12
70
.14
11
.00
1
.00
19
.00
17
.00
2
.00
1
.00
77
.17
110
.19
3
.00
7
.00
30
.00
12
.00
6
.00
0
.00
68
.12
84
.10
23
.00
2
.00
24
.13
16
.00
10
.00
6
.00
no
.13
118
.15
19
.00
6
.00
17
.00
13
.00
9
.00
3
.00
116
.13
51
.22
7
.00
7
.00
34
.00
14
.00
12
.00
7
.00
251
.23
192
.38
16
.00
8
.00
D-13
-------
TABLE D-13.
TEST ODOMETER
3RTE (MILES)
11/30/87
23801
13/24/87
ฃ3981
12/ 3/87
24104
12/ 7/87
24179
12/16/87
2433c
12/22/87
24461
12/28/87
24486
ฆJ 5'88
24637
i/13/88
24657
1/20/68
24748
1/25/88
24832
1/28/86
24911
MAKE FORD MODEL RANGER
TRANSMISSION fi-4 MODEL YR 1985
VIM 1FTCR10A8FUA20564 ENG DISP 2.3 L
PfiCJE:: VEHICLE NO 12 ENG FAMILY FFK2.3T5FAG8
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE
2500 RPM
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDIT
TONING
CONDITIONING
" i:
Cu
.00
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPh";
MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
HC
CC
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
PPM
PCT
PPK
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
J'i
i <
14
.00
11
.04
43
.23
27
.12
1.49
15
.03
11
.01
15
.11
106
.40
30
.22
79
.39
58
.66
386
.62
ฃ3
.20
56
.~3
15
. 03
fa'j
.17
31
.13
104
1.30
53
.10
94
. t3
57
ฆ 34
ฃ21
.77
171
1.30
521
.86
117
1.19
437
.89
65
.49
140
.89
77
.81
97
.40
21
.08
32
. 13
95
.34
108
.54
55
.42
141
.48
1
.07
122
.17
27
.12
52
.17
37
.ฃฃ
174
.62
47
.26
193
.51
24
.07
275
.82
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER ฃ500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPI* NODE
IDLE
MODE
250O
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
HC CO HC CO HC CO HC CO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
452
240
175 .fl
166 .4:
177 .59 296
194 1.30 293
163
131
172 .61
168 1.13 456
161
140
154 .64
.53 ฃ51
.48 70ฃ
ฃ5ฃ
456
.57 ฃ66
.55 213
317
.36
.18
.44
.44
.16
.34
.37
.62
.22
.ฃ3
.18
.16
33
33
78 .88
62 .58
13E 1.73
64
54 .13
156 ฃ.52
89 1.02
30 . Id
89 .65
68 .32
126 .79
167 .62
55 .31
ฃ33 1.05
.44 ฃ14 .82
ฃ45 1.57
201 .63
ฃ01 1.28
133 1.65
173 .59
144 . 55 193 .17 103 1.18 132 . 44
D-14
-------
7036
7067
7107
7246
7309
7381
7489
7582
7644
7710
7791
7868
7920
7998
8110
TABLE D-14.
MAKE 0LDSM0BILE MODEL CUTLASS SUPREME
TRANSMISSION A-3 MODEL YR 1986
VIN 2G3GR69A8G2335325 ENG D1SP 3.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 14 EN6 FAMILY 6463.8V2NSY7
MORNING TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE MODE RPM MODE MODE
HC CO HC CO HC CO HC CO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE MODE RPM MODE MODE
HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
7
.00
3
.00
4
.00
0
.00
1
.02
7
.00
4
.00
0
.00
12
.00
3
.00
11
.00
3
.00
10
.00
6
.00
13
.00
4
.00
8
.00
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
10
.00
1
.00
7
.00
0
.00
3
.00
1
.00
4
.00
0
.00
11
.00
2
.00
8
.00
1
.00
29
.16
75
.43
10
.00
3
.00
B
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
5
.00
0
.00
10
.00
0
.00
5
.00
0
.00
41
.07
3
.00
1
.00
0
.00
8
.00
1
.00
2
.00
0
.00
10
.00
0
.00
7
.00
0
.00
11
.00
0
.00
2
.00
0
.00
7
.01
4
.00
6
.00
0
.00
10
.00
0
.00
8
.00
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
4
.00
0
.00
5
.02
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
16
.00
3
.00
8
.00
8
.00
7
.00
3
.00
11
.00
1
.00
12
.00
4
.00
6
.00
1
.00
10
.00
5
.00
a
.00
1
.00
14
.00
4
.00
6
.00
0
.00
8
.00
4
.00
10
.00
1
.00
13
o
o
2
.00
8
.00
1
.00
15
.00
4
.00
12
.00
2
.00
D-15
-------
TABLE D-15.
MAKE
TRANSMISSION
VIN
HYUNDAI
H-5
KMHL031J0HV077266
MODEL
MODEL YR
ENG DISP
EXCEL 6LS
1987
1.5 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 15
ENG FAMILY HHY1.5V2HFB1
MORNING TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO
DATE (MILES) PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
NODE
2500
RPM NODE
IDLE
NODE
HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
11/11/87
6297
3
.00
3
.00
3
.00
4
.00
16
.05
6
.00
10
.00
4
.00
11/17/87
6502
5
.00
0
.00
5
.00
1
.00
22
.06
43
.34
9
.00
5
.00
11/25/87
6779
6
.00
1
.00
5
.00
1
.00
17
.00
34
.48
6
.00
4
.00
12/ 3/87
7049
8
.00
4
.00
6
.00
2
.00
21
.01
13
.02
10
.00
6
.00
12/ 7/87
7159
11
.00
3
.00
5
.00
2
.00
25
.00
41
.34
6
.00
5
.00
12/16/87
7598
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.02
5
.00
1
.00
0
.00
12/23/87
7868
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
15
.00
12
.05
0
.00
0
.00
12/29/87
8038
10
.00
3
.00
6
.00
3
.00
16
.00
17
.00
6
.00
6
.00
1/ 4/86
8546
6
.00
2
.00
5
.00
1
.00
16
.00
17
.03
8
.00
6
.00
1/14/88
8955
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
18
.50
7
.01
4
.00
0
.00
1/19/88
9089
8
.00
1
.00
6
.00
1
.00
41
.00
20
.02
9
.00
6
.00
1/25/88
9320
11
.00
4
.00
6
.00
2
.00
6
.02
13
.00
7
.00
3
.00
2/ 9/88
9771
9
.00
1
.00
4
.00
0
.00
6
.00
1
.00
7
.00
2
.00
2/15/88
9963
28
.01
4
.00
8
.00
2
.00
12
.00
15
.01
5
.00
3
.00
2/25/88
10259
B
.00
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
16
.00
13
.02
9
.00
2
.00
D-16
-------
TABLE D-16.
MAKE FORD MODEL THUNDERBIRD
TRANSMISSION A-3 MODEL YR 1986
VIN 1FABP46W4GH162741 ENG DISP 2.3 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 16 ENG FAMILY GFM2.3V5F6K3
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM NODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/12/87
28830
44
1.14
1
.02
36
1.07
0
.01
76
2.25
139
1.15
63
1.34
20
.20
11/18/87
28924
59
1.90
65
.68
40
1.38
20
.21
92
3.50
99
.44
60
2.06
59
1.03
11/24/87
28992
57
1.52
25
.27
37
1.34
33
.48
59
1.65
42
.23
44
1.65
0
.02
11/30/87
29048
45
1.08
5
.03
51
1.14
1
.02
29
.49
64
.23
46
1.43
5
.03
12/ 7/87
29184
33
.95
2
.02
45
.95
2
.01
89
3.05
146
1.32
76
1.32
4
.03
12/17/87
29410
61
2.01
46
.56
61
.98
0
.02
87
2.57
85
.50
88
2.07
3
.09
12/22/87
29554
106
2.72
82
1.28
135
1.90
65
.86
71
1.27
91
.47
104
2.36
100
1.59
1/ 6/88
29820
112
1.41
1
.02
54
1.30
0
.02
148
4.76
64
.27
162
1.81
1
.15
1/12/88
29861
86
2.32
66
1.07
142
1.37
45
.70
116
3.66
98
.51
143
1.71
23
.53
1/21/88
29923
136
1.07
1
.01
6
.13
0
.00
162
5.25
382
2.15
128
1.63
9
.02
1/25/88
29974
120
1.72
2
.03
159
1.32
0
.02
149
5.15
27
.25
111
1.80
4
.43
2/ 2/88
30105
307
1.06
54
.44
291
.97
12
.04
634
5.47
122
.63
1135
.95
27
.00
2/10/88
30243
976
.40
42
.23
622
.70
35
.26
1301
3.23
164
.48
915
.63
64
.59
2/16/88
30428
37
1.34
40
.25
44
1.00
1
.01
36
.80
52
.32
49
1.64
19
.16
2/22/88
30531
49
1.44
6
.02
42
1.09
2
.02
54
2.50
79
.39
46
1.98
11
.32
D-17
-------
TABLE D-17.
MAKE FORD MODEL E-150
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1986
VIN 1FDEE14N5GHB46209 EN6 DISP 5.0 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 17 ENG FAMILY GFM5.0T5FZF7
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM NODE
NODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
NODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/13/87
13651
23
.08
41
.12
0
.00
1
.01
58
.37
379
3.95
2
.01
121
.63
U/1B/B7
13876
3
.00
9
.07
0
.00
12
.08
90
.74
292
2.64
1
.01
34
.22
11/23/87
13940
11
.11
18
.05
1
.01
45
.13
47
.12
38
.01
3
.01
24
.06
11/30/87
14257
3
.00
8
.05
2
.00
19
.13
109
.86
246
1.67
21
.51
27
.08
12/ B/B7
14390
3
.00
7
.02
1
.00
7
.02
92
.76
180
.44
2
.00
11
.06
12/17/87
14893
4
.00
17
.07
0
.00
8
.03
77
.43
173
.59
6
.06
22
.08
12/23/87
15136
8
.00
24
.08
0
.00
7
.07
41
.07
47
.05
2
.01
29
.16
12/30/87
15536
4
.00
18
.06
1
.00
28
.18
66
.44
309
3.53
5
.04
43
.23
1/ 5/88
15844
2
.01
25
.32
3
.01
0
.01
105
1.69
378
3.67
1
.03
29
.15
1/11/88
15970
5
.02
36
.19
0
.01
11
.05
58
.31
214
1.85
1
.00
13
.10
1/20/86
16077
3
.00
15
.08
0
.00
9
.08
46
.21
264
3.64
1
.00
50
.41
1/26/88
16280
50
.60
51
.18
0
.00
7
.05
3
.00
16
.04
1
.00
8
.07
2/ 5/88
16555
2
.00
11
.07
0
.00
5
.06
91
1.33
215
2.16
0
.00
15
.10
2/11/88
16747
6
.00
21
.06
1
.00
6
.05
142
2.42
338
3.53
38
1.13
56
.31
2/18/88
16957
6
.00
13
.05
1
.00
10
.03
47
.37
293
2.86
3
.01
25
.12
D-18
-------
TABLE D-18.
MAKE CHEVROLET MODEL CAPRICE CLASSIC
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1984
VIN 2G1AN69H2E92H9318 ENG DISP 5.0 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 18 ENG FAMILY E1G5.7V4NEA3
MORNING TESTS AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 8500 RPM BEFORE 2500 RPH AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE MODE RPM MODE NODE RPM MODE NODE RPM MODE MODE
TEST ODOMETER HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO
DATE (MILES) PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
11/10/87
38161
1
.00
2
.00
0
.05
0
.01
3
.00
4
.00
0
.03
0
.00
11/18/87
38494
0
.00
4
.00
0
.01
0
.00
2
.00
71
.00
0
.01
1
.00
11/23/87
38659
0
.00
3
.00
0
.01
1
.00
1
.00
11
.00
0
.00
9
.13
12/ 1/87
39020
0
.00
7
.00
0
.01
7
.00
8
.00
32
.00
0
.01
5
.00
12/ 9/87
39294
6
.00
12
.00
1
.03
6
.02
21
.00
9
.00
0
.03
9
.09
12/16/87
39480
0
.01
3
.00
0
.02
6
.00
6
.00
18
.00
0
.00
4
.00
12/22/87
39858
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
7
.16
7
.00
no
.00
0
.02
0
.00
12/28/87
40184
0
.00
1
.00
0
.06
4
.00
6
.00
37
.00
0
.00
1
.00
1/ 7/88
40476
1
.01
4
.00
0
.02
7
.00
8
.00
25
.00
0
.04
8
.00
1/14/88
40682
5
.05
10
.00
1
.01
10
.00
8
.02
10
.00
1
.06
7
.00
1/18/88
40817
0
.00
5
.00
0
.02
3
.00
1
.03
8
.00
0
.11
1
.00
1/27/88
41116
0
.00
1
.00
0
.02
1
.00
2
.01
7
.00
0
.04
1
.00
2/ 4/88
41404
4
.03
8
.00
1
.10
5
.03
18
.00
30
.00
1
.02
7
.00
2/ 9/88
41571
0
.04
5
.00
0
.05
6
.00
14
.00
74
.00
0
.01
6
.00
2/18/88
41845
0
.06
4
.00
0
.11
3
.00
9
.00
22
.00
0
.11
4
.00
D-19
-------
TABLE D-19.
MAKE
TRANSMISSION
VIN
PROJECT VEHICLE
CHEVROLET
M-4
1G1JD69P2F7211153
19
MODEL
MODEL YR
ENS DISP
ENG FAMILY
CAVALIER
1985
2.0 L
FIG2.0V5XAG1
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE ฃ500 RPM
C3NDITIQNING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
ฃ500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
ฃ500
IDLE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
SMILESi
PpiM
PCI
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/12/67
5534S
31
.10
150
1.07
->
.22
104
.31
134
.45
257
.79
6
.03
123
.86
11/18/67
j j 4 jo
C
.05
3c
.58
0
.01
57
.56
147
.43
252
.52
14
.07
:is
.66
< '07
-XI I. J / U /
55637
c:
.00
99
.58
4
.00
72
.61
140
.43
222
.38
11
. Ou
37
.54
12/ 2/37
55728
8
.23
164
1.08
c
-J
.02
4 * 7
i A U
1.06
130
.42
241
.53
17
.05
142
.78
12/ 3/67
56074
10
.01
109
.62
6
.01
66
.47
164
.39
262
.47
11
.04
137
.76
12/17/87
56309
6
.08
173
1.17
ฃ
.09
141
.33
143
.43
234
.38
38
.11
204
.88
12/21/87
56409
6
. 03
147
.93
8
.04
123
.39
145
.38
233
JC
13
.06
156
1.03
12/30/37
56438
i
.01
199
1.24
4
.14
138
1.11
171
.45
237
.65
24
.10
184
1.08
ii 5'u3
56604
11
.15
222
1.41
c
J
.03
128
.37
150
.41
246
.38
16
.11
158
.89
1/13/36
56984
0
.00
176
1.12
4
.02
137
1. wC
164
.48
281
.54
8
.05
187
1.03
1/2:,is
57211
15
.02
130
1.05
9
.01
116
1.08
142
.42
220
.34
13
. 05
158
1.01
1/26/88
57316
0
.02
156
.90
5
.12
123
1.03
143
.32
256
.43
16
.05
125
.61
2/ 1/88
57634
40
.14
120
.34
4
.01
77
.38
148
.36
252
.47
16
.04
117
.58
2/ 9/88
57849
3
.01
207
1.12
6
.04
114
.31
169
.39
276
.57
20
.05
170
.86
2/19/88
58091
5
.02
232
1.48
6
. 00
141
1.10
168
.26
266
.48
30
.05
162
.71
D-20
-------
4049
4133
8242
8577
9008
9384
9866
9980
10422
10528
10935
11346
11633
11839
12261
TABLE D-20.
MAKE BUICK MODEL LESABRE
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1987
VIN 1G4HR5435HH546554 ENG DISP 3.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 20 ENG FAMILY H263.8V8XEB7
MORNING TESTS AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
ฃ500 IDLE ฃ500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
PM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM NODE
MODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
I S
1
1
HC
CO
PM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
0
.00
0
o
o
0
.00
0
.00
6
.00
7
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
2
.01
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12
.05
6
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
3
.00
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4
.01
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.01
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.01
2
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
2
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4
.01
3
.01
0
.00
0
.00
6
.01
6
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
12
.01
6
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
7
.00
5
.01
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
4
.00
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
5
.03
6
.00
0
.00
0
.00
D-21
-------
TABLE D-21.
MAKE VOLKSWAGEN MODEL SCIROCCO
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1982
VIN WWCAD538CK023127 ENG DISP 1.7 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO ฃ1 ENG FAMILY CVW1.7V6FSFX
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE ฃ500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/24/87
59400
0
.00
0
.01
0
.00
34
.39
29
.16
18
.01
6
.32
8
.04
12/ 2/87
59656
3
.06
3
.01
1
.00
3
.01
31
.09
30
.01
7
.00
13
.03
12/29/87
60000
2
.00
3
.01
1
.00
35
.54
28
.26
23
.01
4
.00
29
.13
1/ 7/88
60462
2
.00
7
.02
1
.00
50
.47
20
.03
20
.00
4
.00
8
.01
1/14/88
60601
4
.00
7
.01
1
.00
50
.53
27
.02
28
.00
6
.00
34
.12
1/19/88
60995
0
.01
2
.00
0
.00
1
.01
49
.66
33
.09
0
.00
3
.01
1/25/88
61378
1
.00
6
.00
0
.00
2
.00
24
.22
21
.01
3
.00
6
.01
2/ 5/88
61673
12
.18
7
.00
1
.00
2
.00
23
.06
19
.00
2
.00
5
.01
2/ S/88
61918
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
3
.00
36
.21
27
.01
2
.00
8
.01
2/12/88
62062
0
.00
2
.00
0
.03
5
.01
51
.17
26
.00
2
.00
8
.01
2/15/88
62257
3
.00
4
.00
0
.00
n
C
.00
44
.40
34
.02
ฃ
.00
7
.01
2/19/88
62331
1
.00
.00
0
.00
4
.01
46
.30
34
.03
5
.00
10
.01
2/23/88
62519
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.01
25
.11
24
.02
0
.00
3
.02
2/26/88
62571
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.02
34
.47
21
.03
0
.00
3
.02
2/29/88
62768
0
.00
0
.01
0
.00
0
.02
29
.21
19
.02
0
.00
5
.02
D-22
-------
TABLE D-22.
TEST CDDKETER
DATE (WILES)
::/:o'37
6773
31/19/37
7210
11/24/87
7427
12/ 2/S?
1 ut>
12/10/S7
* -.m -
12/14/37
8244
12/23/87
8715
i/ 6/es
3125
1/12/88
9341
1/10/88
3635
1/25/68
3343
2/ 4/ea
10322
2/12/88
< " -i 0
iVOCu
2/19/88
10390
2/24/88
11152
MAKE CHEVROLET MODEL ASTRO
TRANSMISSION ft-4 MODEL YR 1987
VIN 1GNDM1527HB236316 ENS DISP 4,3 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NG 22 ENG FAMILY H3G4.3T5TMGB
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
MODE
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
HC CC HC CO HC CO HC CO
PPX PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
HC CO HC CO HC CC HC CO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
2
.02
67
I'w
0
.00
72
V.
ป uW
71
.23
213
1.44
0
.01
30
* ฉ/
1
I
.00
5T
u.
* J
2
.00
49
.12
95
.83
23e
.24
0
.02
92
J V i
0
.00
4
.03
0
.00
34
.22
80
.37
261
.S3
V
.00
0
U
.02
I
ฆ
-------
JMETER
1ILES)
2287
2876
3462
3991
4978
5309
5695
6446
6851
7472
7796
8300
8865
9666
9972
TABLE D-23.
HAKE NISSAN MODEL PULSAR
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1987
VIN JN1EN34S4HMQ11661 EN6 DISP 1.6 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 23 ENG FAMILY HNS1.6V5FBF2
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
2500
IDLE
PM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
PM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
102
.61
321
.89
2
.00
9
.00
0
.02
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
94
.55
225
.54
4
.00
12
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
80
.56
144
.24
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
76
.56
307
1.33
0
.00
6
.00
4
.00
187
1.14
0
.00
6
.00
79
.54
235
.54
3
.00
15
.00
1
.00
3
.00
1
.00
6
.00
88
.55
174
.38
9
.00
17
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
1
.00
86
.55
281
.80
0
.00
8
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
75
.57
123
.23
0
.00
7
.00
0
.00
1
.00
0
.00
0
.00
92
.55
151
.22
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
77
.52
95
.12
0
.00
ฃ
.00
1
.01
46
.50
0
.00
0
.00
68
.52
302
1.52
1
.00
a
.00
1
.00
4
.00
0
.00
0
.00
68
.56
225
.81
0
.00
3
.00
Ij
.00
0
.00
0
.00
0
.00
84
.52
202
.45
0
.00
6
.00
0
.00
88
.28
1
.00
9
.00
97
.51
169
.28
3
.00
11
.00
0
.00
0
.00
1
.00
5
.00
76
.51
298
1.24
3
.00
12
.00
D-24
-------
TABLE D-24.
MAKE BUICK MODEL CENTURY
TRANSMISSION A-4 MODEL YR 1986
VIN 1G4AH19X6G6410467 ENG DISP 2.8 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 24 ENG FAMILY 61G2.8V2NNA1
MORNING TESTS AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM BEFORE 2500 RPM AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE 2500 IDLE
RPM MODE
NODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM MODE
MODE
RPM NODE
NODE
TEST ODOMETER
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
HC
CO
DATE
(MILES)
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
PPM
PCT
11/17/87
23925
0
.10
0
.00
0
.15
0
.00
1
.09
0
.00
0
.04
0
.00
11/23/87
24124
0
.06
0
.00
0
.02
0
.00
10
.05
0
.00
0
.04
0
.00
12/ 2/87
24311
5
.08
3
.00
0
.09
I
.00
12
.03
5
.00
0
.05
2
.00
12/11/87
24624
5
.06
4
.00
0
.03
2
.00
29
.28
6
.00
1
.14
3
.00
12/16/87
24837
4
.08
2
.00
0
.04
0
.00
7
.00
3
.00
0
.06
1
.00
12/22/87
24946
0
.06
0
.00
0
.10
0
.00
3
.00
0
.00
0
.08
0
.00
12/28/87
25001
0
.09
0
.00
0
.14
0
.00
15
.10
4
.00
0
.08
0
.00
1/ 7/88
25147
0
.02
0
.00
0
.04
0
.00
0
.02
0
.00
0
.06
0
.00
1/14/88
25348
0
.15
0
.00
0
.07
0
.00
9
.04
1
.00
0
.03
0
.00
1/20/88
25509
0
.04
0
.00
0
.05
0
.00
13
.00
3
.00
0
.01
0
.00
1/26/88
25683
10
.17
4
.00
0
.04
0
.00
8
.00
5
.00
0
.06
1
.00
2/ 4/88
25945
36
.68
2
.00
0
.00
0
.00
6
.00
3
.00
0
.03
0
.00
2/12/88
26226
6
.06
1
.00
0
.05
0
.00
8
.00
3
.00
0
.04
0
.00
2/16/88
26338
5
.04
2
.00
0
.02
0
.00
37
.27
9
.01
0
.03
0
.00
2/22/88
26580
3
.13
2
.00
0
.05
0
.00
44
.34
5
.00
0
.14
0
.00
D-25
-------
TABLE D-25.
MAKE VOLVO MODEL 240DL
TRANSMISSION M-5 MODEL YR 1982
VIN YV1AX4920C1212B54 ENG DISP 2.1 L
PROJECT VEHICLE NO 25 ENG FAMILY CW130V6FMP0
MORNING TESTS
AFTERNOON TESTS
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
BEFORE 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
AFTER 2500 RPM
CONDITIONING
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM MODE
IDLE
MODE
2500
RPM NODE
IDLE
NODE
TEST ODOMETER HC CO HC CO HC CO HC CO
DATE (MILES) PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT
HCCOHCCOHCCOHCCO
PPM PCT PPM PCT PPM PCT PPN PCT
11/13/87
64965
69
.32
123
.37
24
.88
66
.23
68
.53
186
1.62
18
.33
55
.12
11/17/87
65120
32
.53
91
.21
14
.49
35
.10
76
.76
133
.74
16
.28
34
.10
12/ 3/87
65525
24
.72
22
.35
0
.01
4
.04
51
.52
55
.42
13
.29
10
.11
12/ 7/87
65618
16
.40
49
.94
22
.63
14
.05
56
.52
64
.38
24
.42
18
.10
12/15/87
65884
26
.42
29
.14
12
.21
15
.09
78
.80
55
.39
26
.43
30
.22
12/22/87
66197
31
.85
82
.34
20
.72
68
.40
84
.64
151
1.41
17
.33
SO
.19
12/28/87
66300
33
.48
115
.65
19
.31
93
.58
86
.60
109
.49
27
.31
69
.10
1/ 8/88
66656
12
.27
10
.04
0
.03
4
.06
71
.62
68
.46
11
.28
8
.12
1/13/88
66768
10
.24
13
.11
11
.48
5
.07
61
.53
59
.49
11
.39
11
.17
1/21/88
67053
13
.17
20
.13
9
.51
6
.07
66
.62
48
.33
20
OJ
11
.14
1/28/88
67263
18
.39
14
.16
1
.03
5
.06
63
.51
70
.53
23
.53
16
.12
2/ 3/88
67399
20
.54
27
.35
0
.03
2
.07
58
.60
52
.44
10
.41
11
.14
2/10/88
67591
13
.17
23
.09
2
.05
10
.08
56
.54
47
.31
18
.36
24
.20
2/16/88
67727
13
.21
21
.10
2
.06
10
.05
86
.81
68
.45
19
.32
20
.10
2/26/88
68007
7
.14
23
.15
0
.05
10
.10
81
.80
69
.34
14
.39
26
.20
D-26
-------
APPENDIX E
PLOTS OF HC-2500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-200 PPM SCALE
Vehicle
Figure E-
No.
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 318i
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
H
C
M P
M
I
ts)
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
A
/ \
1 r
0 10
20
30
40
r
50
~T
60
70
QO
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-l. VEHICLE 1 - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
20
30
50
60
70
80
90
100
40
110
TIME, DAYS
NOTE: 7 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE PLOT F-l
FIGURE E-2. VEHICLE Z - 1984 DODGE RAMCHARGER, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-0
80
100
90
110
50
60
70
30
40
10
20
0
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-3. VEHICLE 3 - 1984 OLDSMOBILE DELTA 88, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
~r
10
~~r
20
~r
30
40
~r
50
r
60
~T~
70
T
00
~r
90
r~
L00
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-4. VEHICLE 4 - 1984 CHEVROLET SILVERADO, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
20
30
50
40
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 4 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE PLOT F-2
FIGURE E-5. VEHICLE 5 - 1981 HONDA CIVIC, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p 100
P
M 80
60
40
20
20
30
40
50
70
90
100
10
60
80
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-6. VEHICLE 6 - 1985 HONDA ACCORD, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
100
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
10
0
20
30
50
40
60
70
BO
90
LOO
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-7. VEHICLE 7 - 1987 JEEP CHEROKEE, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
t ft
1 J ' I
ฆfi 8'"*^ TSI0 ฎ ฉ
1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ซ 1 "> 1 r
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE E-8. VEHICLE 8 - 1982 PEUGEOT 505, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
60
40
20
50
90
100
0
20
30
40
60
70
80
10
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-9. VEHICLE 9 - 1985 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(205)
(279) (212)
140
120
100
80
v
60
40
20
0
0
30
10
20
50
40
60
70
BO
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-10. VEHICLE 10 - 1985 BMW 318i, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(238)
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M 00
60
40
20
50
10
20
30
40
60
70
80
0
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-ll. VEHICLE 11 - 1986 NISSAN PULSAR, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(251)
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M BO
60
40
a.
20
K-
90
50
60
70
80
100
110
30
40
20
10
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE E-12. VEHICLE 12 - 1984 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p 100
P
M 80
60
40
20
50
60
70
80
90
100
10
20
30
40
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-13. VEHICLE 13 - 1985 FORD RANGER, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p 100
P
m aa
60
40
20
110
100
90
BO
60
70
50
40
30
20
10
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-14. VEHICLE 14 - 1986 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS SUPREME, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M 80
60
40
20
50
20
30
40
60
70
10
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-15. VEHICLE 15 - 1987 HYUNDAI EXCEL GS, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
160
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M BO
60
40
20
90
60
LOO
110
60
70
50
40
30
20
10
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 8 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE PLOT F-3
FIGURE E-16. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THUNDERBIRD, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
\
/
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE E-17. VEHICLE 17 - 1984 FORD E-150, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200 -
180 "
160 "
140 '
H 120 "
C
p ioo "
P
w M BO "
M ,
o
60 "
40
20
110
100
90
70
80
SO
60
40
30
20
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-18. VEHICLE 18 - 1984 CHEVROLET CAPRICE CLASSIC, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
p 100
P
M 80
60
40
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-19. VEHICLE 19 - 1985 CHEVROLET CAVALIER, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p 100
P
M 80
60
40
20
110
100
90
80
60
70
50
40
30
20
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-ZO. VEHICLE 20 - 1987 BUICK LESABRE, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200 ~
iao -
160 -
140 -
H 120 "
c
P 100 -
p
m m ao "
CO
60
40
20
0
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-21. VEHICLE 21 - 1982 VOLKSWAGEN SCERROCO, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p too
P
M 80
60
40
20
110
100
90
80
70
50
60
40
30
20
10
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-22. VEHICLE 22 - 1987 CHEVROLET ASTRO, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200 -
1B0 ~
160 "
140 '
H 120 '
C
p ioo "
P
w M BO
to
It*
60 ~
40 '
20 ~
n fih fl fil fl ฆ 9 1 " & 0 -" " ~
1 1 1 ซ 1 1 1 ' 1 > 1 ' 1 ' 1 ป 1 1 1 1 1 ป r
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE E-23. VEHICLE 23 - 1987 NISSAN PULSAR, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
1 ซ
90
40
50
20
30
60
80
0
10
70
100
110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE E-Z4. VEHICLE 24 - 1986 BUICK CENTURY, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE E-Z5. VEHICLE 25 - 1982 VOLVO 240 DL, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX F
REPLOTS OF HC-2500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-600 PPM OR 0-1500 PPM SCALE
Vehicle
Figure F- No. Vehicle Make and Model
1 02 Dodge Ramcharger
2 05 Honda Civic
3 16 Ford Thunderbird
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
600
540
480
420
360
300
240
160
120
60
0
50
60
70
80
90
too
20
30
40
110
0
10
riME. DAYS
FIGURE F-l. VEHICLE 2 - 1984 DODGE RAMCHARGER, HC-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(826)
600
540
480
420
360
300
240
180
120
60
0
40
LOO
110
20
30
50
60
70
60
90
TiME. DAYS
FIGURE F-2. VEHICLE 5 - 1981 HONDA CIVIC, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
1500
1200
H 900
C
P
P
M 600
300
110
50
BO
90
LOO
70
60
20
30
40
riME. DAYS
FIGURE F-3. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THUNDERBIRD, HC-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX G
PLOTS OF HC-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-200 PPM SCALE
Figure G-
Vehicle
No.
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 3181
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
30
10
20
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 4 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE H-l
FIGURE G-l. VEHICLE 1 - 198Z MERCURY ZEPHYR, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
90
100
80
70
110
50
60
30
40
20
10
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-Z. VEHICLE 2 - 1984 DODGE RAMCHARGER, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
(313)
(278)
(231)
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-3. VEHICLE 3 - 1984 OLDSMOBILE DELTA 88, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-4. VEHICLE 4 - 1984 CHEVROLET SILVERADO, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
(227) (392) (201)
200
180
160
140
H 120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
50
10
20
30
80
40
70
90
100
60
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-5. VEHICLE 5 - 1981 HONDA CIVIC, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
(258)(251)
(221)
1 ] 1 1 1 1 I r
i 1 r
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-6. VEHICLE 6 - 1985 HONDA ACCORD, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200 "
100 "
160 ~
140 "
H 120 "
C
p 100 "
P
O M 80 ~
00
60
40
20
*
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
00
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-7. VEHICLE 7 - 1987 JEEP CHEROKEE, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
~" (fi ^ " n"fii ^**
, 1 1 1 1 > 1 i 1 1 1 ' ! > 1 ' 1 > 1 > r
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE G-8. VEHICLE 8 - 1982 PEUGEOT 505, HC-EDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
M -
0
90
100
50
110
20
30
70
BO
60
40
10
TIME. OAYS
FIGURE G-9. VEHICLE 9 - 1985 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF, HC-EDLE VS TIME
-------
/
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M 80
60
40
20
20
40
50
60
90
30
70
80
100
110
10
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 10 OBS WERE OUT OF RANCE, SEE FIGURE H-2
FIGURE G-10. VEHICLE 10 - 1985 BMW 3181, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
(205)
aoo
180
160
140
H 120
C
p ioo
P
M 80
60
40
20
30
0
20
10
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-ll. VEHICLE 11 - 1986 NISSAN PULSAR, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
100
160
140
H 120
C
P ioo
P
M 80
60
40
20
-ฉฆ:
30
50
60
20
40
0
10
00
70
100
90
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-1Z. VEHICLE 12 - 1984 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN, HC-DDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
I \ ! 1; ! I i't-7 i\
' I M |
\ ! T
\
I W ^ 1 i '\
/ ^ ;l I V
I / 1 ! ! \\ } ซ
' \ l\
\ A
y i
/'/ 'HI I \< I ? ^ i
/ 1' X / ^ I 1
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE G-14. VEHICLE 14 - 1986 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS SUPREME, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
H 120
C
p too
P
M BO
60
40
20
20
50
10
30
70
BO
90
0
40
60
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-15. VEHICLE 15 - 1987 HYUNDAI EXCEL GS, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
(382)
90
50
60
70
BO
100
110
40
30
20
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-16. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THUNDERBIRD, HC-EDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
20
0
10
30
50
40
60
80
90
100
110
70
TIME, DAYS
NTOE: 10 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE H-4
FIGURE G-17. VEHICLE 17 - 1984 FORD E-150, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160
140
H 120
C
p 100
P
M BO
60
40
20
0--
110
90
100
00
70
50
60
40
20
30
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE G-18. VEHICLE 18 - 1984 CHEVROLET CAPRICE CLASSIC, HC-EDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160 1
140
\
H 120
C
.31
,\
P
P
100
ฃ M 80
60
40
20
(204) / *
Q / \
/ 0 W
/ V \
/ f\\ />' \ /
* / / V \ /
r\ / / V*/
/,p-\-o / A
'ฆ M ^
/ v
l
I
I f
0
\ V ' /
V \ //
v\ /' A >< ,
\W- ^ - v /
V
\
\
/
\
/
V
/
\ /
\ f
\/
f
\
/
V
.1i1iiซi1iปi1r
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
TIME, DAYS
NOTE: 13 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE H-5
T 1 1 1 1 J 1 f
80 90 100 110
FIGURE G-19. VEHICLE 19 - 1985 CHEVROLET CAVALIER, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
110
90
80
70
50
60
40
30
20
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-20. VEHICLE 20 - 1987 BUICK LESABRE, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
180
160 ~
140 ฆ
H 120
C
P
P
100
? M ao
CO
60 1
40
20 1
0
^
10
Ir
20
~~r
30
~~r
40
~r
50
60
~r
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-21. VEHICLE 21 - 1982 VOLKSWAGEN SCIRROCO, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
9
t i
i i
At
Ay
///% i \\
* % V\
f 'V \ A
\ i /V-V
/K\ / // \ VA
i 1 r
Q'
I
1r
t 1 r
ir
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
10TE: 13 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE H-6
FIGURE G-22. VEHICLE 22 - 1987 CHEVROLET ASTRO, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
(202)
9
ro
200 -
H 120
4
M BO
/
/
/
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 8 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE H-7
FIGURE G-Z3. VEHICLE 23 - 1987 NISSAN PULSAR, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE G-24. VEHICLE 24 - 1986 BUICK CENTURY, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
200
1B0
160
140
120
100
BO
60
40
20
0
\
I
\
/
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 I T"
50 60 70 80 90 100
TIME. DAYS
t r
110
i 1 r
3 10
iปi1r
20 30 40
FIGURE G-25. VEHICLE 25 - 1982 VOLVO Z40 DL, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX H
REPLOTS OP HC-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-400 or 0-800 PPM SCALE
Vehicle
Figure H- No. Vehicle Make and Model
1 01 Mercury Zephyr
2 10 BMW 318i
3 13 Ford Ranger
4 17 Ford E-l 50 Van
5 19 Chevrolet Cavalier
6 22 Chevrolet Astro Van
7 23 Nissan Pulsar
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
400
360
320
280
H 240
C
p 200
P
M 160
120
BO
40
90
LOO
50
70
BO
110
60
20
30
40
10
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE H-l. VEHICLE 1 - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
400
360
320
280
H 240
200
M 160
120
T
o
50
60
80
90
20
30
40
70
100
10
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE H-2. VEHICLE 10 - 1985 BMW 318i, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
800
700
600
500
H
C
400
P
P
M
300
200
100
LOO
40
50
70
90
20
60
80
110
10
30
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE H-3. VEHICLE 13 - 1985 FORD RANGER, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
I
-------
400
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
0
r
R \
' V A<-^>V'
v / ^ \ 0 /ฆ
' V V
ฆo
.ซ+
i 1 ซ 1i
10 20 30
"t 1 ป 1 1 1 1 r
50 60 70 80
-i 1 1 1 1 p
90 100 110
40
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE H-5. VEHICLE 19 - 1985 CHEVROLET CAVALIER, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
400
360
320
2B0
H 240
C
p 200
P
M 160
120
80
40
ioo
90
110
20
80
50
60
40
30
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE H-6. VEHICLE 22 - 1987 CHEVROLET ASTRO, HC-EDLE VS TIME
-------
400
360
320
2B0
240
200
160
120
80
40
0
A
A
r
D
~T~
10
i ฆ r
30 40
I 1 1 1 r
60 70 BO
" r
110
20
50
90
100
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE H-7. VEHICLE 23 - 1987 NISSAN PULSAR, HC-IDLE VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX I
PLOTS OF CO-Z500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-2 PERCENT SCALE
Figure I-
Vehicle
No,
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 318i
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE 1-1. VEHICLE 1 - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0
20
10
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-2. VEHICLE 2-1984 DODGE RAMCHARGER, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
C
0
P
c
T
0 .6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
BO
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 4 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE J-l
FIGURE 1-3. VEHICLE 3 - 1984 OLDSMOBILE DELTA 88, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-4. VEHICLE 4 - 1984 CHEVROLET SILVERADO, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
fifi
ffi
fifi
110
NOTE:
4 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE J-2
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE 1-5. VEHICLE 5-1981 HONDA CIVIC, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0.4
0.2
0.0
-ฃsi ฎ a ฉSh
r1i1i1r
0 10 20 30
t 1 1 1 r
60 70
si a ฆ 'Si
-a
i 1 r
80 90
i 1 r
100 no
40
50
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 12 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE J-3
FIGURE 1-6. VEHICLE 6 - 1985 HONDA ACCORD, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0
8
6
4
2
0
8
6
A
2
0
~8 -fi &
I 1 I ' 1 1 I ' I ' 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-7. VEHICLE 7 -1987 JEEP CHEROKEE, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0.0
Q ft ฎ Q
L| , 1 1 1 i | i | i | i | i | i j i j i i i r
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-8. VEHICLE 8 - 1982 PEUGEOT 505, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
~ T 0.8
i
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
! ! /
i 11
11
11
1: /
'I
+
Q. 0--9K--
1 ' I ' 1 ' I ' J
0 10 20 30 40
NOTE: 14 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE J-4
50
60
1"
70
I
80
90
100
TIME. DAYS
110
FIGURE 1-9. VEHICLE 9 - 1985 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
r T 0.8 "3
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
(2.05
J
/ / /ฃ
/ ^
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE 1-10. VEHICLE 10 - 1985 BMW 318i, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(6.79)
2.0
i.a
1.6
1.4
c 1.2
0
P
C
Cs>
1.0
v T 0.8
0.6
0.4
0 . 2
0.0
B
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-11. VEHICLE 11 - 1986 NISSAN PULSAR, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
1. B
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
r T 0.8
I
W
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
&
FIGURE 1-12. VEHICLE 12
TIME. DAYS
1984 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
J
I*
I*.
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
M T 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 19
0.0
Q
r ป
/ ป
f *
(2.52)
0
f i
1 \
i t
i i
r ป
9
\
A
10
20
30
40
r
50
60
r
70
r
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-13. VEHICLE 13 - 1985 FORD RANGER, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0 ~
1.8 ~
1.6 ~
1.4 "
C 1.2 "
0
p 1.0 "
C
v T 0.8 ~
0.6
0.4
0.2
ฃ ft
o
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE 1-14. VEHICLE 14 - 1986 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS SUPREME, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0.2
50
80
90
100
110
70
20
30
40
60
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-15. VEHICLE 15 - 1987 HYUNDAI EXCEL GS, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(2.01)
/
fcjf *
I ' 1 r 1
80 90 100
110
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 16 OBS WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE J-5
FIGURE 1-16. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THUNDERBIRD, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
(2.42)
0.6
50
0
20
30
10
40
70
80
60
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-17. VEHICLE 17 - 1984 FORD E-150, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
0.6
0.2
50
100
80
110
70
90
60
40
20
30
10
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-18. VEHICLE 18 - 1984 CHEVROLET CAPRICE CLASSIC, C02500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0 1
1.8
1.6 1
1.4
c 1.2 i
0
p
c
1.0
r t o. a
o
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-19. VEHICLE 19 - 1985 CHEVROLET CAVALIER, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0 ~
l.B "
i .6 ~
1.4 "
C 1.2 -
0
p 1.0 '
C
3 T 0.8 '
ปป
0.6 "
0.4 ~
0.2 "
riME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-20. VEHICLE 20 - 1987 BUICK LESABRE, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0 ~
1.8 "
1.6 "
1.4
C 1.2 ~
0
P
C
1.0 ~
ฃ T 0.8
CO
g a w
-------
2.0
0.2
70
00
100
50
90
110
60
40
20
30
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-22. VEHICLE 22 - 1987 CHEVROLET ASTRO, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
1.6
0.6
40 ft
50
70
20
40
90
30
60
BO
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-23. VEHICLE 23 - 1987 NISSAN PULSAR, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
2.0
i.a
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
r T 0.8
en
no
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE 1-24. VEHICLE 24 - 1986 BUICK CENTURY, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE I 25. VEHICLE 25 - 1982 VOLVO 240 DL, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX J
REPLOTS OF COZ500 RPM EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-4, 0-6, or 0-7 PERCENT SCALE
Vehicle
Figure J- No. Vehicle Make and Model
1 03 Oldsmobile Delta 88
2 05 Honda Civic
3 06 Honda Accord
4 09 Volkswagen Golf
5 16 Ford Tunderbird
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
0
3.6
3.2
2.8
2.4
2.0
6
2
0.0
.4
.0
80
90
100
110
50
70
60
40
20
30
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE J-l. VEHICLE 3 - 1984 OLDSMOBILE DELTA 88, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
0
3.6
2
2.8
2.4
0
6
2
B
4
0
LOO
90
110
80
70
50
60
20
40
30
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE J-2. VEHICLE 5 - 1981 HONDA CIVIC, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
3.6
2.0
2.0
50
80
10
20
30
40
60
70
90
LOO
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE J-3. VEHICLE 6 - 1985 HONDA ACCORD, CO-Z500 RPM VS TIME
-------
7 *
C
0 4
P
C 3
V T
-------
6
5
4
3
a
'---ov
1
0
10
20
30
0
40
50
60
70
BO
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE J-5. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THTJNDERBIRD, CO-2500 RPM VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX K
PLOTS OF CO-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-2 PERCENT SCALE
Vehicle
Figure K-
No.
Vehicle Make and Model
1
01
Mercury Zephyr
2
02
Dodge Ramcharger
3
03
Oldsmobile Delta 88
4
04
Chevrolet Silverado
5
05
Honda Civic
6
06
Honda Accord
7
07
Jeep Cherokee
8
08
Peugeot 505
9
09
Volkswagen Golf
10
10
BMW 318i
11
11
Nissan Pulsar
12
12
Chevrolet Suburban
13
13
Ford Ranger
14
14
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
15
15
Hyundai Excel GLS
16
16
Ford Tunderbird
17
17
Ford E-150 Van
18
18
Chevrolet Caprice Classic
19
19
Chevrolet Cavalier
20
20
Buick Le Sabre
21
21
Volkswagen Scirocco
22
22
Chevrolet Astro Van
23
23
Nissan Pulsar
24
24
Buick Century
25
25
Volvo 240 DL
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
0
8
6
4
2
0
8
6
A
2
0
(2.58)
\
h
I \
\
\ I \ i\
I \ I \
\ I
(Bi gi
ml W
! \ ' \
i / i
* I 1
I / I
\ i L / \
it ft 8ft SB ft ft ฆฆ ฆ ฆ ฆ ฆฃฃ 8
I 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i ' i 1 i [ i > i i r
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-l. VEHICLE 1 - 1982 MERCURY ZEPHYR, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
a.o
50
70
BO
90
100
40
60
20
30
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-2. VEHICLE 2 - 1984 DODGE RAMCHARGER, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
Q
P
C
1.0
W T 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-3. VEHICLE 3 - 1984 OLDSMOBELE DELTA 88, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.4 "
C 1.2 "
0
C
W T 0.8 "
I
cn
0.6 ~
0.4 ~
0.2 "
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-4. VEHICLE 4 - 1984 CHEVROLET SILVERADO, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
(5.5)
r=s
8
M @
110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-5. VEHICLE 5 - 1981 HONDA CIVIC, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
10
50
70
80
90
20
30
60
100
40
110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-6. VEHICLE 6 - 1985 HONDA ACCORD, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1 .8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
I
Oo
1.0
5* T 0.0
0.6
0.4
0.2
n n ฎฎฎ
. I . 1 r
T
10
20
30
i 1 r
40 50
-0 Or
] i | r
60 70
B0
90
100 110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-7. VEHICLE 7 - 1987 JEEP CHEROKEE, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
t
>o
2.0
l.B
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
T 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
ft
10
20
" r
30
r
40
50
t 1 1 r
60 70
I r
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-8. VEHICLE 8 - 1982 PEUGEOT 505, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
K T 0.8
1
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-t
/ \
\
I l
I I
I /
I I
' /
I l
l l
l '
' >
/ *
V
i
/ i
/
I \
0
60
70
80
90
100
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 6 OBS HAD MISSING VALUES OR WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE L-l
1 10
FIGURE K-9. VEHICLE 9 - 1985 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
0
8
6
4
2
0
Q
6
4
2
0
ftฉ ฎ- 0
ft*
r I I 1 1 1 1 T
10 20 30 40
i 1 r
50 60
i ฆ r
80 90
70
100 no
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-10. VEHICLE 10 - 1985 BMW 318i, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1. 6
1. 4
C 1.2
0
P
C
1.0
* T 0 . 8
I*
CO
0.6
0.4
0.2
(2.09)
o. o P
-ft &-
0
10
20
30
40
50
r
60
-8
70
80
90
t ฆ> r
100 no
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE
K
-11. VEHICLE 11
- 1986 NISSAN PULSAR, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 110
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-12. VEHICLE 12 - 1984 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
0
B
6
4
2
0
8
6
4
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
00
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-13. VEHICLE 13 - 1985 FORD RANGER, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0 ~
1.8 "
1.6 ~
1.4 ~
C 1.2 "
0
P 1*ฐ "
C
? T 0.8"
ป*
Ui
0.6 -
20
90
30
70
80
LOO
60
110
40
50
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-14. VEHICLE 14 - 1986 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS SUPREME, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
0.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-15. VEHICLE 15 - 1987 HYUNDAI EXCEL GS, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
(2.15)
2.0
C
0
P
c
T 0.0
0.2
80
90
100
110
70
60
50
20
30
40
riME. DAYS
FIGURE K-16. VEHICLE 16 - 1986 FORD THUNDERBIRD, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
0
8
6
4
2
0
B
6
4
2
0
K
0
A. / ^
V-ฉ- ,
Q.
~~r
50
r
60
r
70
~~r
80
r
90
100
110
TIME. DAYS
NOTE: 8 OBS HAD MISSING VALUES OR WERE OUT OF RANGE, SEE FIGURE L-2
FIGURE K-17. VEHICLE 17 - 1984 FORD E-150, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
l.a
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
0
P
c
1.0
? T 0.8
ปป
>o
0.6
0.4
ft
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-18. VEHICLE 18 - 1984 CHEVROLET CAPRICE CLASSIC, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-19. VEHICLE 19 - 1985 CHEVROLET CAVALIER, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
20 30 40
FIGURE K-ZO. VEHICLE 20
~r
50
r
60
~r
70
T
80
T
90
100
r
110
TIME. DAYS
1987 BUICK LESABRE, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
l.B
1.6
1.4
C 1.2 "
0
P
C
1.0
* T 0.0 1
0.6
0.4
rj
CnJ
\
"A
\
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-21. VEHICLE 21 - 1982 VOLKSWAGEN SCIRROCO, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
-ฆO-
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-22. VEHICLE 22 - 1987 CHEVROLET ASTRO, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
FIGURE K-Z3. VEHICLE 23
f
~r
50
r
60
r
70
~r
BO
~~r
90
100
"ซr
no
TIME, DAYS
1987 NISSAN PULSAR, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
C 1.2 ~
0
P
C
ro
uป
1.0
* T 0. B
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 W *
T
0
I r
10
I 1 r-
20 30
I ' 1 r
40 50
60
-i 1 1 J r
70 80
a
90
tiซ r
100 no
TIME, DAYS
FIGURE K-Z4. VEHICLE 24 - 1986 BUICK CENTURY, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
2.0 "
1.8 -
1.6
1.4
C 1.2
Q
P
C
1.0 -
W T 0.8
cU
O*
0.6 "
0.4
0.2
0.0
A
\
\
\
0--D-
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE K-25. VEHICLE 25 - 1982 VOLVO 240 DL, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
APPENDIX L
REPLOTS OF CO-IDLE EMISSIONS VERSUS TIME
0-4 or 0-7 PERCENT SCALE
Vehicle
Figure L- No. Vehicle Make and Model
1 09 Volkswagen Golf
2 17 Ford E-150 Van
Legend for Plots
x - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - am
+ - After 2500 rpm conditioning - am
# - Before 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
0 - After 2500 rpm conditioning - pm
-------
7
6
5
A
3
2
1
0
90
LOO
50
60
70
BO
110
30
AO
20
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE L-l. VEHICLE 9 - 1985 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
3.2
2.8
C 2.4
0
P
C
T
O.B
110
90
100
BO
70
50
60
20
30
40
TIME. DAYS
FIGURE L-2. VEHICLE 17- 1984 FORD E-150, CO-IDLE VS TIME
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA 460-3-88-008
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOIปNO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
6. REPORT DATE
September 1988
VARIABILITY OF I/M TEST SCORES OVER TIME
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Lawrence R. Smith
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORG'VNIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
Work Assignment B-2
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-4844
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME ANO ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final. Report (8/11/87-3/88)
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. abstract program involved conducting twice-weekly I/M (Inspection and
Maintenance) emission short tests on twenty-five late model gasoline-fueled
vehicles over a 15-week time period. All of the twenty-five vehicles (1981 model
year or later) were tested once in the morning and again later that same day
following a soak period of at least three hours. The vehicles tested in the program
were owned by Southwest Research Institute employees and were selected to
represent a variety of vehicle types, emission controls, etc. Emission tests were
conducted using two Bear Automotive Type 42-925 4-Gas Infrared Analyzers with
generic software. Each emission test sequence included a "Test Analyzer
Specifications" ("TAS") sequence (i.e., 2500 rpm/idle test with emissions measured in
both modes), a vehicle conditioning step utilizing three minutes of engine operation
at 2500 ฑ 300 rpm with the vehicle transmission in neutral, idling in neutral for 15
seconds, and finally a second TAS sequence. The tests were conducted to provide
EPA with information regarding:
Variability in short test emission results
Impact of off-idle no-load preconditioning cycles on short test emissions,
and
Emission differences between a fully-warmed vehicle and a "soaked"
vehicle having undergone minimum operation.
Hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions are reported for each vehicle in tabular
and graphical form. Hydrocarbons are reported in ppm and carbon monoxide in
percent.
17.
KEY WORDS AND OOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. cosati Field/Group
Air Pollution
Exhaust Emissions
Motor Vehicles
Emission Short Tests
Pre-conditioning Effect
Inspection and
Maintenance
s
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
209
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (73)
------- |