United States Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control EPA-460/3-81 -031
Environmental Protection Emission Control Technology Division July 1981
Agency 2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Emissions From Heavy-Duty Engines
Using The 1984 Transient Test
Procedure Volume I —Gasoline
-------
E P A-460/3-81 -031
Emissions From Heavy-Duty Engines Using
The 1984 Transient Test Procedure
Volume I —Gasoline
by
Sherrill Martin
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
Contract No. 68-03-2603
EPA Project Officer: Richard Nash, et al
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise and Radiation
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Standards Development and Support Branch
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
July 1981
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to
report technical data of interest to a limited number of readers.
Copies are available free of charge to Federal employees, current
contractors and grantees, and nonprofit organizations-in limited
quantities-from the Library Services Office (MD-35), Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring-
field, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency
by Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio,
Texas, in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-03-2603. The contents of
this report are reproduced herein as received from Southwest Re-
search Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed
are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is
not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-81-031
ii
-------
ABSTRACT
This volume of the two-volume report describes the heavy-duty, gasoline
engine baseline emissions evaluations conducted at Southwest Research Insti-
tute. Initially, a facility was developed which was capable of complying
with the requirements in the 1984 dynamometer transient procedure. Seventeen
gasoline engines were then tested over the transient and the nine-mode
emissions test procedures. Included were 1969 model year engines for HC
baseline, 1972-73 engines for NOx baseline, and 1978-79 engines for correla-
tion purposes. Emissions measured were hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and
oxides of nitrogen on all engines.
iii
-------
FOREWORD
This project was initiated by the Standards Development and Support
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48105. The effort on which this two-volume report is based was per-
formed by the Department of Emissions Research, Southwest Research Institute,
6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. This project, authorized by
Contract 68-03-2603, began on September 26, 1977 and was completed on July 1,
1981.
The SwKI Project Leader was Mr. Sherrill Martin,; Mr. Charles Urban
assisted in supervising the gasoline engine, NO^ baseline phase of this pro-
ject. Mr. Karl Springer was the Project Manager and was primarily respon-
sible for the technical and fiscal negotiation of the initial project and
subsequent modifications.
The initial Project Officer was Mr. Richard Nash of the Standards
Development and Support Branch, Environmental Protection Agency. Subsequent
Project Officers were Mr. Richard Burgeson, Mr. Timothy Cox, and Mr. Eugene
Danielson. This project was identified within Southwest Research Institute
as Project 05-5044-001.
Iv
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT iii
FOREWORD iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES . viii
I. •SUMMARY 1
II. INTRODUCTION 3
A. Project Objective 3
B. Emissions Test Procedures 3
C. Engines Evaluated 3
D. Engine Testing 3
E. Project Reviews And Modifications 4
III. OPERATIONAL EQUIPMENT 5
A. Dynamometer and Controls 6
B. Environmental Controls 7
C. Exhaust Dilution System 7
IV. EMISSION SAMPLING AND ANALYSES 8
A. Transient Evaluations 8
B. Nine-Mode Evaluations 9
V. TEST PLAN, PREPARATIONS, AND DATA REDUCTION 12
VI. HC AND CO BASELINE TESTING 16
A. Engines Tested 16
B. Engine Tune-up and Maintenance 16
C. Emissions Test Results 18
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS iCont'd).
Page
VII. NOx BASELINE TESTING
21
A. Engines Tested
B. Engine Tune-Up and Maintenance
C. Emissions Test Results
21
21
28
VIII. NEW CURRENT TECHNOLOGY ENGINES
34
A. Engines Tested
B. Emissions Test Results
34
34
LIST OF REFERENCES
36
APPENDICES
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
B. HC AND CO BASELINE TEST RESULTS
C. NOx BASELINE TEST RESULTS
D. NOx BASELINE DATA COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
E. NOx BASELINE ENGINE TUNE-UP RECORD SHEETS
F. TEST RESULTS ON NEW ENGINES
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1 Views of the transient procedure test facility
vii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
.1 Description of EM-267 Leaded Gasoline 14
2 1969 HC and CO Baseline Engines Tested 17
J Summary of HC and CO Baseline Test Results 19
4 1972 and 1973 N0X Baseline Engines Tested 22
5 N0X Baseline Engine Tune-Up and Maintenance 24
6 Summary of N0X Baseline Test Results 29
7 Summary of Idle HC and CO Emissions 30
8 New 1978 and 1979 Engines Tested 34
9 Summary of the New Engine Test Results 35
viii
-------
.1. SUMMARY
The major objective of this project was to obtain baseline emissions
data on heavy-duty engines using the Transient Test Procedure.(1)* This
involved developing the necessary dynamometer control and data acquisition
systems and then utilizing these systems to evaluate engine emissions over
the transient cycle. With the gasoline engines, emissions evaluations over
the nine-mode procedure and at idle were also conducted.
The data generated in this project, along with data generated at the EPA,
were utilized by the EPA to establish baseline values for HC, CO, and N0X-
These baseline emissions values, along with a summary of the source data, are
given in EPA reports.(2,3)
Emissions data were aenerated on a total of seventeen gasoline engines,
three of which were tested more than once. Nine of these seventeen engines
were 1972-73 model-year enaines which provided data for the N0X baseline
determination. Of the other eight engines, five were 1969 model-year for HC
and CO baseline, and three were 1978-79 model-year representative of the then
current technology. In addition to the generation of data to be incorporated
into the emissions baseline for heavy-duty gasoline engines, a number of the
findings appear to be of importance. Several of these findings are included
in this summary.
With the 1972-73 model-year engines, there did not appear to be any
direct relationship between HC anc CO emissions at idle and in the transient
test. With CO, the two engines with the higher CO values at idle produced
the lower amounts of CO in the transient tests. Also, with these 1972-73
engines, the methane emissions in the transient cycle were between four and
eight percent of the total hydrocarbon emissions, with an overall average of
six percent.
The relationship between some of the emissions in the transient and nine-
mode tests appeared to be dependent on the model-year of the engine. This
is illustrated by the following data summary:
Transient t Nine-mode Values, in %
Engines
HC
S9.
N0X
Fuel
Avg. of
nine 1972-73
83
225
91
95
Avg. of
three 1978-79
320
230
107
93
As shown, for the 1972-73 engines, the average CO emissions was twice as
high in the transient tests than in the nine-mode tests, while HC and CO were
~Numbers in parentheses indicate references at the end of this report.
-------
slightly lower. Por the 1978-79 engines, CO was also twice as high, but HC
war. three times higher and NO- was slightly higher, in the transient tests
than in the nine-mode tests. With the 1972-73 and the 1978-79 engines, the
average fuel consumption was slightly lower in the transient tests. Of pri-
mary interest, however, was that the transient to nine-mode HC emissions
ratio was lower for the 1972-73 engines and substantially higher for the
1978-79 engines. This is indicative that HC emissions in the nine-mode test
does not accurately reflect the HC emissions produced under transient
operation.
Another significant finding was the importance of conducting extensive
tune-ups, component checks and diagnostic testing on in-use engines prior to
acceptance for testing. Some example findings were incorrect components on
the engines, grossly incorrect adjustment of idle-mixture, and defective
components.
2
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
This two-volume report describes the program to evaluate emissions from
heavy-duty gasoline and diesel" engines used in vehicles over 8,500 pounds
GVW. These emissions evaluations involved the use of the 1984 Transient Test
Procedure. This volume, Volume 1, reports the results of evaluations con-
ducted on gasoline engines. The second volume covers evaluations of diesel
engines.
A. Project Objective
The primary objective of this project was to obtain baseline emissions
data on heavy-duty engines using the Transient Test Procedure. Meeting
the objective, initially, required the development of appropriate dynamometer
control and data analyses systems.
B. Emissions Test Procedures
With the gasoline engines, nine-mode and transient test procedures were
utilized in this project. At the time this project was initiated, the
Transient Test Procedure was in draft form and the ability to run this tran-
sient test remained to be demonstrated. This transient test cycle involves
relatively rapid, simultaneous changes in engine speed and power output.
C. Engines Evaluated
Three groups of gasoline engines were evaluated in this project. These
were ly69 model-year engines for HC and CO baseline, 1972-/3 enqines for NOx
baseline, and 1978-79 engines for correlation purposes. A total of twenty-
one engine test series were conducted involving a total of seventeen differ-
ent engines. Nine of the seventeen engines were 1972-73 model-year, for' use
in the NOx baseline. At the start of this project, most of the engines
received had been removed from the vehicle prior to shipment to thi.« labora-
tory. As the project progresses, most of the engines were removed from the
vehicle at this laboratory.
D. Engine Testing
The test plan underwent changes as the project progressed, with finali—
zation occurring during the evaluations of the N0X baseline engines. During
the latter part of the project, a test series on an engine consisted of
checking the engine prior to removal from the vehicle, performing an exten-
sive tune-up after mounting on the test stand, and then conducting duplicate
transient, nine-mode and idle evaluations.
3
-------
E. Project Reviews and Modifications
A number ot meetings, discussions and reviews were held, with the
Project Officer and cognizant individuals from the EPA and/or engine manu-
facturers, during the course of this project. All of the changes which
occurred were subsequently incorporated into a revised Scope of Work during
the conductance of the gasoline engine, N0X baseline evaluations. Copies of
the revised and the initial Scopes of Work are included in Appendices A-l
and A-2.
4
-------
III. OPERATIONAL EQUIPMENT
Conductance of the transient evaluations required the development and
application of some advanced dynamometer control systems. In addition,
environmental controls were subsequently required. This section describes
the equipment and controls utilized in this project. Illustrative views of
the systems are given in Figure 1.
A. Dynamometer and Controls
The overall control scheme for the transient tests consists of two inde-
pendent closed-loop systems. The speed is controlled by the dynamometer, and
the torque by the engine. An alternate control scheme was briefly considered,
but it was concluded that such a scheme could not lead to stable operation
below the peak torque speed of the engine, particularly on cold-start tfests.
The dynamometer system consists of an Eaton Dynamatic Model E-2000, with
proprietary quick-unload circuitry. This dynamometer has a motoring capacity
of 150 kW (200 hp) and an absorption capacity of 373 kW (500 hp). The quick-
unload circuitry was necessary to speed up the ordinarily sluggish response
of this type of dynamometer. Although this dynamometer can absorb power at
speeds of up to 5000 rpm, the motoring speed was a maximum of 3500 rpm. The EPA
ran comparison tests to determine whether this limitation had an effect on
emissions and concluded that any such effect was insignificant.
To provide transient command signals, a Remex paper tape reader and a
Northern Ampower Corporation digital programmer provide continuous analog
output, redirected at one second intervals. This system was available and
was found to be adequate for use in this application.
Speed control feedback is provided by a D.C. tachometer which is
directly driven by the dynamometer.
The torque control loop consists of the following main elements:
• Analog command signal
• Servo amplifier
• Servomotor attached to rhrottie
• Driveshaft torquemeter
• Strain gage conditioner
The analog command from the Northern Ampower programmer is fed to the torque
command inputs of the servo amplifier. The signal from the strain gage con-
ditioner goes into the torque feedback input. An error amplifier decides the
direction and magnitude of the current to the throttle/servomotor. Two
adjustments are available on the servo amplifier. Tne span control adjusts
the torque command level appropriately for the engine begin tested. The gain
5
-------
Control Console
Engine on Test Stand
Outlet from CVS Mixing Chamber
Inlet to CVS Mixing Chamber
I
Figure 1. Views of the transient Drocedure test facility.
6
-------
control adjusts the responsiveness of the system. It is adjusted to the
position at which minor oscillation begins at a couple of points in the cycle.
B. Environmental Controls
The gasoline test cell has two environmental control systems. The first
is a wall-mounted air conditioner which insures that the test cell is the
proper temperature for an overnight cold soak. Beginning with the first N0X
baseline engine, the Project Officer requested tnat humidity, as well as
temperature, be controlled during the test. To accomplish this, a second
system was constructed which provided conditioned air directly to the test
cell. Filtered air from outside the building is passed through a chilled
water spray chamber to establish the proper absolute humidity level. The air
then passes through a demistor followed by an electrically heated reheat
section to establish a 25°C (77°F) temperature. Temperature and dewpoint
are monitored as closely as practical to the engine inlet. Humidity control
requirement was 10.7+2.1 grams of water per kilogram (75±15 grains of water
per pound) of dry air. Generally, the actual control of humidity was signi-
ficantly better than these limits.
C. Exhaust Dilution System
The CVS system used was essentially a scaled-up version of the system
used for emissions testing of light-duty vehicles. ' Nominal CVS flow rate
utilized was 40 m^/min (1400 CI'M). This CVS flow is that necessary to pre-
vent water condensation in the bags for the high speed and power Los Angeles
driving segment, without over diluting the exhaust during the New York Non-
Freeway segment of the cycle.
7
-------
IV. EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND ANALYSES
The test cycles included in this project involved transient, nine-mode
and idle operation. Although these cycles remained essentially unchanged
throughout this project, some significant changes did occur in the emissions
sampling and measurement. These changes are identified and discussed in this
section of the report.
A. Transient Evaluations
At the time this project was initiated, the transient test procedure was
still under development. The recommended practice intended to go into effect
for 1983 engine^ existed only in draft form. Initial tests were performed
under the guidelines in the original Scope of Work.
The purpose of the transient tests is to provide a more realistic simu-
lation of the on-the-road driving conditions, during emission sampling, than the
previous steady-state tests could provide. The transient test procedure, as
enacted into law for the 1984 model year, is described in detail in Reference
1. The elements of the procedure, as conducted at SwRI during this baseline
program, are described as follows:
• The engine is mapped for maximum available torque versus speed over
the range of speeds encountered during the transeint test. This
speed range is from 400 rpm (or 200 rpm below idle, whichever is
higher) to 15 percent above rated speed. The mapping is accom-
plished in a single sweep from low speed to high speed, pausing 15
seconds at 100 rpm intervals. The torque is read during the last 5
seconds of the pause.
• The required cycle is determined, at one second intervals, in terms
of rpm and torque.
• Practice runs are made to insure that the regression line toler-
ances are being met.
• After an overnight soak, a cold start transient test is run.
Whereas the procedure calls for only a single emissions sample bag
to be taken during the test for baseline purposes, four bags were
taken, dividing the test into four subcycles. In this way, emis-
sion factors for various types of driving were obtained for future
use in emission inventory and impact analysis.
• After a twenty-minute soak, the cycle is repeated for a hot-start
test.
8
-------
• The regression line data is analyzed to determine if the cycles
were run within required tolerance.
• The emission data is analyzed and results for the cycle computed.
The following four gaseous emissions were measured:
• Hydrocarbons (HC)
• Carbon Monoxide (CO)
• Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
• Oxides of Nitrogen (N0X)
All emissions were measured from bagged samples.
At the start of this project, a statistical method for determination of
cycle validation was not available. Therefore, the test cycles for Engines 1
through 6 were validated by examination of speed-torque traces recorded
during the tests. Beginning with Engine 7, the test cycles were validated by
the regression line analysis called for in the proposed regulations.d) The
only deviation from these proposed regulations as the tests progressed was
in the regression analysis criteria; these were relaxed somewhat as a result
of experience gained at the EPA.
B. Nine-Mode Evaluations
The 1979 nine-mode procedure was utilized with Engines 1 through 11.
This procedure involved modes based on a percentage of maximum torques and
continuous sampling of the undiluted exhaust. An individual bagged sampling
procedure was utilized with Engines 13 through 22. Nine-modes tests were
not conducted on Engine 12.
1. Continuous Sampling of Undiluted Exhaust
The 1979 nine-mode test procedure is fully described in the Federal
Register.(&) Briefly, it involves running a sequence of nine modes twice,
staying in each mode for one minute. Emissions are recorded continuously in
each mode for one minute, but the emissions data are read only during the
last ten seconds in each mode, except for cut-throttle. For cut-throttle,
the emissions data are read during the last 50 seconds. The test sequence
is conducted at a steady speed of 2000 rpro, except for the idle modes.
During the early part of the test program, there was a growing
concern about the reliability of N0X measurements of raw exhaust by the
methods then used. These concerns were, described in a memorandum.(7) in
view of these problems, the Project Officer directed that remaining nine-mode
tests -be carried out under a modified procedure which measured emissions by a
dilute bag method. This procedure was already -in use at the EPA.
2. Bagged Sampling of Diluted Exhaust
In accordance with a telephoned directive from the Project Officer,
the use of bagged samples of diluted exhaust was incorporated into the
9
-------
project, starting with Engine 13.(8) jn a cursory comparative evaluation,
this method produced N0X results which were essentially equivalent to those
results produced by continuous sampling. The primary benefit of using bagged
samples was that they could be conducted at a greatly reduced level of effort.
Engine speed and load settings for each mode were the same as used in the
previously described procedure involving continuous sampling.
A copy of the bagged sample nine-mode procedure is given in
Appendix A-3 and is briefly described as follows:
• Go to Mode 1 and stabilize in one minute.
• Take bag sample for five minutes.
• Repeat stabilization and sampling for Modes 2 through 9.
The five minute modes enabled using the same bag sampling system as was
utilized for the transient evaluations. A hand operated throttle was used in
these nine-mode evaluations.
The modal emission concentrations were converted to mass emissions
using a standard single bag computer program. The composite nine-mode
results were then calculated using these modal mass emissions, the time per
mode, the modal power output, and the modal weighting factor.
3. Idle Tests
Emissions were measured at idle on all gasoline engines evaluated.
Through Engine 15, these evaluations included the standard idle speed and a
no-load speed of 2500 rpm. Subsequent to Engine 15, the evaluations at 2500
rpm were discontinued as directed by the EPA Project Officer.
With Engines 1 through 15, undiluted HC and CO were measured on a
garage-type emissions analyzer and undiluted CO2 was measured using a labora-
tory grade analyzer. In addition, bagged samples of CVS diluted exhaust were
analyzed for HC, CO, NOx and C02- Subsequent to Engine 15, the use of the
garage-type analyzer was discontinued as directed by the EPA Project Officer.
The garage-type analyzer used was unstable and unreliable, thereby requiring
an excessively high level of effort to maintain and operate.
For Engines 14 through 22, HC and CO emissions, on an undiluted
basis, were calculated using the measured diluted values and the ratio of the
undiluted to diluted CO2 concentration. With Engine 15, extra special care
was taken in measuring the undiluted emissions using the garage-type analyzer
to use in comparisons of the measured and calculated values. The calculated
CO emissions were four percent higher than measured values, an essentially
insignificant difference. With HC, the garage-type analyzer measured in ppm
hexane and the dilute emissions were measured in ppm carbon. This factor
makes comparison of the HC values to be inappropriate.
4. Methane Analyses
With Engines 17 through 22, methane was determined for the tran-
sient cycle tests using the' SAE J1151 procedure "Methane Measurement Using
10
-------
Gas Chromatography." The same bagged sample was used for measurement of
methane as was used for the regulated emissions. As specified by the EPA
Project Officer, the methane in g/kW-hr was calculated by multiplying the
mass rate of total hydrocarbons by the volumetric ratio of methane.
11
-------
V. TEST PLAN, PREPARATIONS, AND DATA REDUCTION
This section describes the test plan followed, the preparations for
testing, the fuel and lubricant used, and the methods utilized for analyzing
the data.
A. Test Plan
The original test plan is shown in Appendix A-2. Due to numerous
changes that occurred, subsequently, a modified Plan of Performance was
prepared. This modified Plan of Performance incorporated the operating
changes that were put into effect by the EPA Project Officer.
Some examples of the project changes that occurred which significantly
affected the effort were:
• Several engines, upon receipt, were not testworthy and others
required considerable verification and some required mechanical
repair.
• Rework and repair during tune-up (i.e., governors, carburetor
linkage, etc.) was more extensive than anticipated.
• Additional cycles and emissions determinations, such as nine-
mode and methane evaluations.
• Technical difficulty in following cycle and meeting the
prescribed cycle parameters.
Although the basic purpose of this contract remained the same, many of
the specific goals and the methods for achieving the goals changed. The
final Scope of Work is shown in Appendix A-l.
B. Engine Preparation and Tune-Up
At the start of this project, the engines were mounted onto the test
stand, given a minor tune-up, and tested. Repairs, such as replacement of
leaky valves in the engine, were not allowed in the original Scope of Work.
As the project progressed, the engines were being received mounted in a
truck and were checked over prior to mounting on the test stand. Subse-
quently, even more extensive tune-ups, and further assurances that the engine
met manufacturer's specifications, were incorporated into this project. With
the last several engines evaluated, some mechanical repair was conducted
prior to testing.
12
-------
Engines 1 through 3 - During this period in the project, only the four
following tune-up items were to be checked: idle speed, idle CO,, timing, and
dwell. New engines were to be adjusted to manufacturer's sj>ecifications, if
necessary. Used engines were tested as-received, then tuned-up and retested.
Correlation engines received from EPA were to be tested as-received, except
for possible idle-speed adjustment.
Engine 4 - For this engine, additional requirements included a compres-
sion check, valve lash adjustment (if applicable), and replacement of several
components during the tune-up.
Engines 5 through 15 - For these engines, preparation was governed by an
"Engine Tune-Up Specifications Check List," provided by the Project Officer.
The main additional requirement was for the distributor advance curve.
During this period, carburetor adjustments, other than idle speed and gov-
ernor operations, were not made.
Engines 16 through 22 - With these engines, an initial examination was
conducted before removal of the engine from the vehicle, carburetor air/fuel
mixture was adjusted, more extensive component checks were made, and some
rework of the valves was conducted. The final modifications to the data
sheets were used for Engines 19 through 22, but there were no major changes
with Engines 19 through 22, relative to Engines 16 through 18. Generally,
only a few additional checks and diagnostic tests were incorporated. The
details of the tune-up requirements can be obtained from the tune-up data
sheets, which are included in Appendix E.
C. Fuels and Lubricants
A single batch of EM-267 leaded exhaust emissions fuel was used for all
emissions tests conducted in this project. The properties of this fuel are
given in Table 1. This fuel meets all of the requirements of the fuel des-
scribed in the proposed regulations.The lubricant used throughout this
project was Mobile Delvac SAE 30.
D. Data Reduction
Data taken during the engine tests included:
• Test Validation
• Emissions Data
Test validation was achieved by means of a Fluke 2240B Datalogger, which
scanned the speed and torque command and feedback channels, as well as the
throttle position, once, per second. The channel scan rate of 15 channels per
second, along with the order of scanning, resulted in a 200 millisecond delay
between recording of the torque command and feedback signals. At the same
time, a 70 millisecond delay was experienced between the recording in a
suitable format on 7-track tape. The tape was then processed on a Hewlett-
Packard computer at a neighboring department of the Institute to determine
if the test met statistical specifications. The program listing and sample
printouts are given in Appendix A-4. An additional requirement was that the
13
-------
TABLE 1. DESCRIPTION OF EM-267 LEADED GASOLINE
Specific Gravity, at 60°F
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Research Octane No.
Lead, g/gal
Sulfur, Wt%
Distillation, °F
(% Evaporated)
IBP
10%
50%
90%
EP
Hydrocarbons, Vol. %
Aromatics
Olefins
Saturates
Specifications
in the Proposed
EM-267 Regulations^^
0.744
9.1 8.7-9.2
101 90 min
2": 6 1.4 min.
0.003 0.10 max.
85 75-95
134 120-135
218 200-230
309 300-325
360 415 Max
27 35 Max.
1 10 Max,
72 Remainder
14
-------
integrated work for the cycle must fall within the limits of +5 to -15 per-
cent. of the calculated reference work. This was determined by continuously
integrating a horsepower feedback signal derived from the torque and speed
feedback signals.
Emissions data reduction was conducted in accordance with the method
described in the proposed rules.(1) Diluted gas samples were collected in
bags and analyzed in a bag analysis cart for HC, CO, CO2/ and N0X. The com-
puter programs and subroutines used in calculating the transient emissions
were derived from the bag analysis programs already in use for light-duty
testing. Modifications were made to accommodate the fact that the transient
cycle was divided into four segments (NYNF, LANF, LAF, NYNF), and bag samples
were taken for each cycle. The computer programs calculated emission values
for each segment, as well as a composite for the entire cycle.
E. Data Reporting Formats
.The data generated in this project were reported to the EPA in several
different formats. These formats are briefly described as follows:
Data Summary - The most pertinent data were summarized and these sum-
maries were used in the progress reports and are included in Appendices B, C,
and F.
Emissions Computer Coding Sheets - Data obtained were entered onto com-
puter coding sheets (HD BASELINE TEST) that were provided by the EPA.
Engine Computer Coding Sheets - Engine information was entered onto
computer coding sheets (HEAVY DUTY ENGINE INFORMATION) provided by the EPA.
15
-------
VI. HC AND CO BASELINE TESTING
The HC and CO baseline testing involved 1969 heavy-duty gasoline engines.
Emissions are reported for transient and nine-mode tests.
A. Engines Tested
Five different 19G9 heavy-duty gasoline engines were evaluated in the HC
and CO baseline phase of this project. The engines, and the heavy-duty
vehicles from which they were removed, are identified in Table 2.
Three of the five* engines were received mounted in the respective trucks.
Two of the engines were received in shipping crates. Engines 2 and 13 were
tested at the EPA prior to shipment to this laboratory. Engine 5 was
retested as Engine 9.
B. Engine Tune-up and Maintenance
During the He and CO baseline portion of this project, the tune-up pro-
cedure and scope evolved in response to the as-received condition of the
engines. The original test plan for' in-use engines required testing as
received, checking of the idle speed, idle CO, timing, and dwell, adjusting
these parameters if necessary, and retesting. Subsequent requirements added
the replacement of accessories, compression testing, and valve adjustment,
and deleted carburetor mixture adjustment.
Tune-up and maintenance performed on each engine is briefly described
as follows:
Engine 2 - This was a correlation engine, previously tested at EPA.
Therefore, no adjustments were desirable. However, the idle speed as
received was 360 rpm. This was adjusted to 700 rpm, the manufacturer's
specification.
Engine 3 - Besides adjusting the basic four parameters, the plugs,
points, and condenser were replaced.
Engine 4 - In addition to the adjustments and replacement items for
Engine 3, a compression check was performed and the distributor cap, rotor,
spark plug wires, oil and fuel filters, and PCV valve were replaced.
Engine 5 - In addition to the items covered in the tune-up of
Engine 4, the valves were adjusted (Engine 4 had hydraulic lifters). In
accordance with the tune-up check list provided by the EPA, the idle CO was
not checked or adjusted. The distributor advance curve was checked and found
16
-------
TABLE 2. 1969 HC AND CO BASELINE ENGINES TESTED
Engine
Number
Model
Year
Engine Description
Make
CID
Serial Number
2
1969
IHC
304
304-648048
3
1969
IHC
345
345-687073
4
1969
IIIC
304
V304-735364
5 & 9
1969a
Chevrolet
366
3955274T.
13
1969
Ford
360
9E13Fb
Engine
Number
Heavy-Duby Vchicle_Description
Model
Year
Make
Serial Number
2
3C
4
5 & 9
13
1969
1969
1969
I HC
IHC
Chevrolet
ND
00416011937177
SE529P854232
^Engine 9 was a retest of Engine 5.
Number from Engine Identification Tag.
^Truck was rented from owner in Kentucky.
Engine 5 & 9 came from a Model C-50 School Bus.
17
-------
to be out of specification. The advance springs were replaced to achieve
proper advance. The governor was found to be disconnected and v/as still
inoperative when connected. The cross shaft in the distributor v/as exces-
sively worn. GM provided a new distributor. The carburetor secondary
actuator had a split diaphragm, which was replaced.
Engine 9 - This was the same engine as Number 5, after it had been
shipped to the EPA and returned. In compression checks, the compression
within the cylinders varied from 75 to 105 as Engine 5 and from 65 to 120 as
Engine 9.
Engine 13 - This engine was previously tested at EPA, therefore, no
tune-up was performed. When 9-mode tests were run on this engine, the HC
emissions were nearly double those obtained by EPA, with a factor of ten dif-
ference in the 10 percent mode. It was concluded that some aspect of the
engine had changed since the transient testa had been run. Investigation
showed that the vacuum advance diaphragm had developed a leak. Replacement
of the diaphragm had no noticeable effect on HC emissions. The Project
Officer decided to move on to the next engine.
C. Emissions Test Results
Summaries of the emissions test results and copies of the computer print-
outs are given in Appendix B. Brief summaries of the results are presented
in this section of the report.
The transient and nine-mode emissions results are summarized in Table 3.
Of interest in these data are the nine-mode HC results for Engines 2 and 4
and the significant differences between most of the results with Engines 5
and 9. These areas of interest are discussed as follows:
Engines 2 and 4 - With Engines 2 and 4, the CO concentration at
idle (based on nine-mode data) was 8 to 10 percent and about 75 percent of
the total nine-mode composite HC was produced in the idle and cut-throttle
modes. The values for all emissions with these two engines were very similar
as shown in the following summary:
Values in g/kW-hr
Transient Nine-Mode
Engine
HC 12.0 12.0 25.6 27.1
CO 164. 159. 151. 167.
NOx 8.4 7.8 9.7 8.7
Fuel 402. 370. 431. 423.
18
-------
TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF HC AND CO BASELINE TEST RESULTS
Engine
2
2
Make £ CID
IHC
IHC
304
304
Test
Tran.b
N-M
Emissions and Fuel, gAW-hr
HC
12.0
25.6
CO
164
151
NO
X
8.4
9.7
Fuel
402
431
3
3
IHC
IHC
345
345
Tran.J
N-M
9.4
9.5
125
87
10.2
12.4
387
43.3
4
4
IHC
IHC
304
304
Tran.1
N-M
12.0
27.1
159
167
7.8
8,7
370
423
5
5
9C
nC
Chev.
Chev.
Chev.
Chev.
366
366
366
366
Tran.
N-M
Tran.
N-M
14.7
17.1
11.4
17.4
256
230
181
275
4.4
4.7
6.2
3.4
453.
457
403
500
13
13
Ford
Ford
360
360
Tran.
N-M
8.2
14.8
132
76
7.0
7.1
382
447
aTran. = Transient N-M = Nine-Mode
^With these engines, cycle speed above 100 percent were set to 100 percent.
cRetest of engine previously tested as Engine 5.
1?
-------
Engine 3 - This was the only engine tested both before and after
tune-up. Results of these tests are as follows:
Values in g/kW-hr
Transient Nine-Mode
Pre-tune Post-tune Pre-tune Post-tune
HC 9.3 9.4 11.6 9.5
CO 111. 125. 93. 87.
N0X 12.3 10.2 12.4 12.4
Fuel 387. 390. 413.
Engines 5 and 9 - Engine 5 was retested as Engine 9, after it had
been shipped to the EPA and returned. It should be noted that the compres-
sion pressures varied greatly between cylinders. In the transient tests, a
decrease was noted in HC, CO, and fuel consumption, and an .increase in N0X.
Results of these tests are summarized as follows:
Values in g/kW-hr
Transient Nine-Mode
Eng. 5 Eng. 9 Eng. 5 Eng. 9
HC 14.7 11.4 17.1 17.4
CO 256. 181. 230. 275.
NOx 7.8 6.2 4.7 3.4
Fuel 370. 403. 457. 500.
20
-------
VII. N0X BASELINE TESTING
The N0X baseline testing involved 1972 and 1973 heavy-duty gasoline
engines. Emissions were evaluated in transient, nine-mode and idle tests.
Results of the N0X baseline testing are given in Appendices C, D and E.
A. Engines Tested
Nine different 1972 and 1973 heavy-duty gasoline engines were tested in
the N0X baseline phase of this project. The engines, and the heavy-duty
vehicles from which they were removed, are identified in Table 4. Included
are one or more engines from each of the five major domestic heavy-duty gas-
oline engine manufacturers.
Engine 22 was a tuned-up version of the engine which had previously been
evaluated as Engine 11. Engine 21 had been removed from a vehicle prior to
the shipment of the engine to this laboratory. No readable serial numbers
were located on the two Ford engines, and with Engine 19 the sixth digit
could have been either a 3 or an 8.
A 1973 Dodge 318 engine had been scheduled for testing as Engine 12.
However, when installed on the test stand it was determined to be running
very poorly. A compression test showed zero in one cylinder. Removing the
cylinder head revealed that an exhaust valve had no head and that the corre-
sponding piston had been damaged. The Project Officer directed,that no
further effort be expended on that engine.
The engines actually tested were all operable when received, but the
overall initial condition of these engines varied greatly. Defects in the
engines were generally detected during initial screening checks or during the
more extensive examinations that were performed on each engine, subsequent
to Engine 15. All significant engine repairs or modifications (i.e., replace-
ment of a valve) were conducted under the specific directive of the EPA
Project Officer, and his approval was obtained prior to the commencement of
testing of each engine.
B. Engine Tune-Up and Maintenance
Tune-up of each engine involved replacement and/or adjustment of spark
plugs, ignition wires, thermostat, distributor cap, points, rotor, condenser,
PCV valve, air filter, fuel filter, oil filter and oil. Other adjustments
or examinations included: ignition timing, valve clearances, cylinder compres-
sion, and the distributor mechanical and vacuum advance curves. As directed
by the EPA Project Officer, carburetor idle mixture adjustment was incorpor-
ated after Engine 15, and cylinder power balancing and/or other evaluations
21
-------
TABLE 4 . 1972 AND 1973 N0X BASELINE ENGINES TESTED
Engine Description
Engine
Model
Number a
Year
Make
CID
Serial Number
14
1972
Ford
361
—M —
15
1972
Dodge
413
J413TH
16
1973
Chevrolet
454
T0608TRC
17
1973
GMC
427
T1113AHT
18
1972
Chevrolet
350
V0210TLX
19
1972b
IHC
345
1099236V345E
20
1973
Ford
300
21
1973
IHC
304
107287V304A
22°
1973
GMC
366
T0818T0A
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Description
Engine
Model
Number
Year
Hake
Serial Number
14
1972
Ford
F60ECP53814
15
1973
Dodge
M39BN35060736
16
1973
Chevrolet
CPZ373V320634
17
1973
. GMC
TCE66TV570537
18
.1972
Chevrolet
CPE322F150073
19
1973
IHC
106620H352956
20
1972
Ford
F60BCN42126
Z1
22
1973
GMC
TCE61TV603311
Evaluations were intiated on Engine 12, a 1973 Dodge 318,
but were discontinued when mechanical condition of this
.engine was found to be unacceptable.
No apparent change between the 1972 and the 1973 model year.
CEngine 22 was initially tested as Engine 11.
22
-------
were conducted when justified by the results of the tune-up or the other
examinations.
More extensive examination of the engines was incorporated into this
project during conductance of the NOx baseline evaluations starting with
Engine 16. Modified tune-up data sheets were incorporated with Engine 19.
In addition, more extensive component checks were conducted to assure that
the engines were representative of their respective model year and more
extensive enyine repairs were performed. All decisions, concerning signifi-
cant engine repair or parts replacement and concerning acceptance of an
engine for testing, were made by the EPA Project Officer. The tune-up data
sheets are included in Appendix E and a selected summary of the tune-ups and
the maintenance performed on the engines is given in Table 5.
Through Engine 15, tune-ups were conducted but major maintenance was
generally not permitted. The tune-up and maintenance performed on each
engine, subsequent to Engine 14, is briefly described as follows:
Engine 15 - A couple of minor difficulties were encountered with the
1972 Dodge 318 engine. The fuel pump sprung a leak after the first test and
was replaced. The carburetor secondaries did not function smoothly, even
after applying WD-40 to the linkage and bearing surfaces.
Engine 16 - The 1973 Chevrolet 454 was found to have a bad valve in
Cylinder 6. This valve was replaced at the request of the Project Officer.
During installation of the engine on the stand, it was determined that the
left exhaust manifold was warped. It was also noticed that the manifold
included air injection tubes. GM was contacted and from the carburetor and
distributor numbers determined that this was a California engine with the
air-pump missing. The engine was converted to "Federal" by changing the
carburetor, intake manifold, and distributor.
The replacement distributor obtained had the right model number but had
the wrong advance curve. Upon checking in the Motor Truck and Diesel Repair
Manual, it was determined that the 1973 and 1974 models of this engine used
the same distributor, but with different advance curves. Several additional
distributors were obtained locally, but all of them met the 1974 advance
curve specifications. The solution applied was to replace the weights with
ones giving an acceptable advance curve.
The components, as-received and as subsequently tested, are identified
as follows:
Distributor
Carburetor
Intake Manifold
Exhaust Manifold
As-Received As-Tested
1112105 1112113
7043507 7043207
330856 333839
With Air Tubes Air Tubes Removed
In addition to replacing the intake valve on Cylinder Number 6, the valve
seals were replaced on Cylinders 2, 4, 6, and 8. The cylinder compression
23
-------
gir
mbc
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
TABLE 5. NO BASELINE ENGINE TUNE-UP AND MAINTENANCE
X
Compression
Year Make CID Specs¦ As Tested
1972 Ford 361 ~ 80-120
1972 Dodge 413 100-140 100-110
1973 Chev. 454 20 Var. 130-145
1973 GMC 427 80%
1972 Chev. 350 80*
100-125
125-150
1972 IHC 345 — 115-125
1972 Ford 300 75% 115-135
1973 IHC 304
125-135
1973 GMC 366 80'
115-135
Problems Encountered and Maintenance Performed
Carburetor secondaries did not function smoothly, even after
lubrication. Fuel pump leaked and was replaced.
A leaky valve in Cylinder 6 was replaced. Replaced carburetor,
intake maniford and distributor to convert engine from Cali-
fornia to Federal configuration. Distributor with correct
advance curve could not be obtained, so the curve had to be
shaped.
Intake valve and seals replaced and exhaust valve reseated in
Cylinder 5. Governor was replaced. Added three quarts of
engine oil during the evaluations.
Throttle shaft bushing was significantly worn. Slight valve
clatter on the left side of the engine, carburetor secondaries
would open abruptly.
Carburetor was not correct model and was replaced.
Engine as received did not have an air cleaner or a thermo-
stat and the carburetor and distributor were not the correct
model numbers. These items were installed or replaced as
required. All valves were reseated, water pump and starter
were defective and were replaced. The idle mixture spring
on the carburetor was collapsed and was subsequently reworked.
Upon receipt there was a carburetor fuel leak and the idle
mixture could not be adjusted. Repairs were made by over-
hauling the carburetor. The bowl gasket and an o-ring were
found to be faulty. Idle fuel mixture adjustment was extremely
sensitive on this engine.
Governor did not function and was replaced. Accelerator pump
was repaired. Cylinders 4 and 7 were "off balance" based on
the General Motors cylinder balance test.
-------
pressures were as follows:
Compression Pressures, gage reading
Cylinder
Dry
Wet
Repaired
1
120
140
120
3
120
130
120
5
125
135
125
7
125
140
120
2
130
145
135
4
115
140
125
6
90
95
125
8
115
140
120
After replacement of the intake valve in Cylinder 6, the compression pres-
sures ranged from 120 to 135 with an average of 125. The specification given
in the Service Manual was 150 with the lowest to be within 20 of the highest.
The compression in this engine did not Quite meet the specification in the
Service Manual, but was well within the usual in-service requirement that the
lowest be within 75 or 80 percent of the highest value.
Engine 17 - With the 1972 GMC 427 engine, the intake valve was replaced
and the exhaust valve was reseated on Cylinder Number 5 prior to the removal
of this engine from the truck. The compression pressures were as follows:
Compression Pressures, gage reading
Cylinder
Dry
Wet
Repaired
1
110
125
110
3
105
120
100
5
85
85
125
7
110
110
100
2
115
120
no
4
110
105
100
6
120
135
110
8
125
135
120
After replacing the intake valve in Cylinder Number 5, the compression pres-
sures were within the requirement that the lowest reading be within 80 per-
cent of the highest.
Upon receipt of the truck, the lubricant level in the engine was about
two quarts below the full mark on the dipstick. During the course of the
engine set-up and emissions testing, a total of three quarts of oil were
added to the engine. There was no noticeable lubricant leakage from the
engine. Exhaust smoke, during prolonged cut-throttle operation with this
engine, was relatively severe. This condition, which primarily occurred
during the nine-mode test, possibly accounts for a major part of the oil
consumption.
The governor circuit in the distributor, and the governor itself, were
not functioning on the engine as received. Therefore, the distributor and
governor were replaced with operable units having the same part numbers.
25
-------
The idle mixture was set using the specified 50 rpm lean-drop method.
The resultant CO level at 550 rpm was between 1.0 and 1.5 percent. This was
also determined to be the lowest CO level achievable with reasonably accept-
able idle.
Engine 18 - The 1972 Chevrolet engine required no rework and no replace-
ment of major components. The compression pressures ranged from 125 to 150
with an average of 135. The specification given in the Service Manual was
150 with the lowest to be within 20 of the highest. The compression in this
engine almost met the specification in the Service Manual and was well within
the usual in-service requirement that the lowest be within 75 or 80 percent
of the highest value.
This engine did have a worn throttle bushing, but this did not appear to
have any serious effects. This worn bushing, however, may have been respon-
sible for the variations in the emissions values measured in the idle tests.
Engine 19 - With the 1972 International 345, it was determined that the
Holley 151786-R94 carburetor was not the correct unit. A manufacturer's
representative was contacted, and one of the carburetor models recommended
was obtained. The carburetor obtained for use with this IHC 345 was a
454578-C91. The measured compression ratio values ranged from 115 to 125.
Engine 20 - With the 1972 Ford 300 engine, the initial compression
values ranged from 80 to 120. Indications were that this cylinder head had
previously had one or more valve jobs performed on it, based on the appear-
ance of the valves and the recess in the head. The EPA Project Officer
directed that minimum rework be performed and then to recheck the compression.
After seating of the valves, the compression values ranged from 115 to 135
and met the requirement that the lowest value be at least 75 percent of the
highest.
This engine as received had a D3TF12127GA distributor and a YF64255
carburetor, and did not have an air cleaner. The carburetor was replaced
with a D2TZ9510-AA carburetor replacement kit (Carburetor tag was Motorcraft
D2HF KA) obtained through the EPA Project Officer. The distributor, appar-
ently a 1973 model, was replaced with a rebuilt unit C9TZ-12127-FRM (C6TF-
12127-AG on the distributor) which was obtained locally from a Ford dealer.
This replacement distributor had the appropriate mechanical advance curve,
but required rework of the vacuum advance unit to obtain the specified
vacuum advance . curve. An air cleaner was obtained and installed onto the
engine.
With this engine, it was very difficult to assure the correctness of
replacement components (carburetor and distributor) and some of the tune-up
requirements (idle mixture adjustment) from available written sources (the
manufacturer's shop manual or the Motor Repair Manual). In all cases, final
pre-test acceptance was based on verbal approval from the EPA Project Officer.
Engine 21 - With the 1973 IHC 304 engine, there was a significant
external fuel leak from the carburetor bowl and the idle-mixture could not be
adjusted to obtain a CO value below several percent. The external leak was
26
-------
found to be due to a faulty bowl gasket and an internal leak was due to a
faulty O-ring. A replacement carburetor was not available so the existing
carburetor was overhauled. This problem with the carburetor was the only
difficulty of significance that was experienced with the IIIC 304 engine. One
item of possible interest, however, was a relatively large change in idle CO
levels with small changes in the setting of the idle mixture screws (i.e,
less than one-eighth of a turn would change idle CO from 0.6% to 1.2%). This
made the setting and retaining of the specified CO percent somewhat difficult
with this engine.
Engine 22 - The 1973 GMC 366 engine, previously tested as Engine 11, was
retested as Engine 22. There were questions concerning the N0X emissions
values that were originally obtained when this engine was tested as Engine 11.
This engine was treated as though no previous tests had been conducted and
underwent all current test and pre-test requirements.
In the tune-up, the only adjustable parameter found to be out of speci-
fication was the idle mixture. It should be noted that, at the time Engine
11 was evaluated, adjustment of the idle mixture was not permitted.
Testing was then initiated with this engine. The operation of the
engine during the initial testing indicated the accelerator pump was not
functioning. It was found that the check-ball in the accelerator pump
chamber was laying loose in the chamber. The accelerator pump was repaired
and the testing was resumed.
Following the evaluations with this engine, several additional engine
diagnostic tests were conducted. The results are briefly summarized as
follows:
Cylinder
Leaka
Cylinder'3
RPMd
Carb. e
Cylinder
Compression
Down
Balance
Drop
Balance
1
130
8
A600-
65
X1120
2
130
8
B665
75
Y1045
3
120
26
B665
70
Y1045
4
120
14
C000c
45
X1120
5
125
11
D660
75
Y1045
6
125
15
A600
55
X1120
7
130
10
C000c
75
X1120
8
125
10
D660
70
Y1045
a Using a Sun Leak-Down Tester
b With six cylinders grounded.from initial 1500 rpm
c Engine died
^ With one cylinder grounded from initial 1500 rpm
e With four cylinders grounded from initial 1500 rpm
These data indicate that cylinder four was a weak cylinder. An addi-
tional check showed that all valves had approximately the same amount
of lift. A rather severe knocking developed in the left side of the
engine, and diagnostic evaluations were discontinued with this engine.
27
-------
C. Emissions Test Results
Summaries of the emissions test results are given in Appendix C and
copies of the computer printouts are given in Appendix D. Brief summaries of
results are presented in this section of the report.
1. Transient and Nine-Mode Emissions
The transient and nine-mode emissions results are summarized in
Table 6. These data show that, for the overall average, the HC, N0X and fuel
consumj^tion were somewhat lower for the transient tests than for the nine-
mode tests, and power was somewhat higher. The CO emissions, however, were
over twice as high in the transient tests as in the nine-mode tests. Inclu-
sion of these data into the baseline was conducted by the EPA, as reported in
the EPA technical report, "1972-73 Heavy-Duty Engine Baseline Program and N0X
Emission Standard Development."^)
2. Methane Emissions
The average methane emissions for the transient evaluations are
summarized as follows:
Emissions, g/kW-hr Percent of Total HC
Engine
Total HC
Methane
Methane
Non-Methane
17
8.0
0.50
6
94
18
5.4
0.37
7
93
19
6.4
0.43
7
93
20
10.1
0.40
4
96
21
5.5
0.34
6
94
22
7.8
0.60
8
92
Avg.
7.2
0.44
6
94
The methane, as a percent of the total hydrocarbons in the exhaust, ranged
from 4 to 8 percent; with an overall average of 6 percent.
3. Idle Emissions
Initially, the HC and CO emissions were measured using a garage-type
analyzer, and N0X was measured using the nine-mode emissions cart. With
Engines 14 and 15, HC and CO at idle were also determined using dilute bag
samples. Subsequent to Engine 15, measurement of N0X at idle was discontin-
ued and the HC, CO and C02 emissions were determined using a dilute bag
sample. CO2 was also measured in the undiluted exhaust, and the dilute HC
and CO emission concentrations were adjusted, to an undiluted exhaust basis,
using the ratio of the undiluted to diluted concentrations of CO2. The
results of the emissions results are summarized in Table 7. These data show
that the two engines that produced the highest HC at idle (Engines 17 and 20) ,
also produced high HC emissions in the transient tests. In general, however,
there did not appear to be any direct relationship between emissions at idle
and in the transient test. This is best illustrated for HC by the average
data for Engines 16 and 18 and for Engines 19 and 21. Engines 16 and 18
28
-------
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF NOx BASELINE TEST RESULTS
Emissions and Fuel, g/kW-hr
Power
Engine
Make &
CID
Test3
HC
CO
N0X
°°2.
Fuel
kW
14
Ford
361
Tran.
14.7
216
6.2
937
417
23.4
14
Ford
361
N-M
10.9
120
8.6
989
415
21.4
15
Dodge
413
Tran.
9.5
212
7.2
982
424
26.9
15
Dodge
413
N-M
10.7
71
9.3
1132
423
23.1
16
Chev.
454
Tran.
3.9
100
6.1
1160
420
27.5
16
Chev.
454
N-M
6.7
31
6.0
1292
461
22.0
17
GMC
427
Tran.
8.0
68
10.9
1038
369
28.4
17
GMC
427
N-M
10.6
47
9.8
1060
387
25.6
18
Chev.
350
Tran.
5.1
108
8.4
90.1
343
24.7
18
Chev.
350
N-M
9.0
44
9.7
1004
374
20.1
19
IHC
345
Tran.
6.4
151
6.5
846
347
26.9
19
IHC
• 345
N-M
8.4
46
9.2
956
390
20.3
20
Ford
300
Tran.
10.1
95
11.6
935
352
19.4
20
Ford
300
N-M
9.9
43
11.7
1030
374
16.7
21
IHC
304
Tran.
5.5
115
7.9
934
357
23.0
21
IHC
204
N-M
9.2
75
8.8
994
405
o
•
00
H
22
GMC
366
Tran.
7.8
175
6.4
984
405
25.2
22
GMC
366
n-m
8.6
132
5.6
1008
397
21.6
Average of
Tran/N-
-M in %
83
225
91
92
95
120
Minimum Tran/N-M in %
57
133
71
87
88
109
Maximum Tran/N-M in %
135
328
114
98
102
133
3 Tran
. = Transient
N-M =
Nine-Mode
29
-------
TABLE 7. SUMMARY OF IDLE HC AND CO EMISSIONS
Emissions
Idle Idle * Transient Cycle,
Engine
HC,
ppmC
CO,
%
Transient
g/kW-hr
HC
CO
HC
CO
14
—
—
—
14.7
216
15
—
—
—
9.5
212
16
5097
0.9
1300
0.01
3.9
100
17
7700
2.7
1000
0.04
8.0
68
18
4200
2.3
800
0.02
5.1
108
19
2100
1.4
300
0.01
6.4
151
20
17900
3.9
1800
0.04
10.1
95
21
1600
0.3
300
0.00
5.5
115
22
4900
1.0
600
0.01
7.8
175
16,17&2Q
10000
1400
__
7.3
18,19&21
2600
—
500
—
5.7
16&18
4600
1000
_ _
4.5
19&21
1900
—
300
—
6.0
17&20
__
3.3
0.04
82
16S21
0.6
<0.01
—
108
30
-------
produced about 2.5 times as much HC in the idle tests as produced by Engines
19 and 21, but only 75% as much in the transient tests. The lack of correla-
tion for the CO emissions is best illustrated by the average data for Engines
17 and 20 and for Engines 16 and 21.
With Engine 20, the HC emissions at idle could be considered to be
excessively high. The specific cause for the high HC emissions was not
determined. The mechanical condition of this engine was discussed in the
preceeding Section VII B.
4. Findings With Specific Engines
Several findings with a number of the engines were of interest and
assist in understanding some of the results obtained. The findings are
briefly discussed as follows:
Engine Power and Torque - With the 1972 model gasoline engines, the
manufacturer's rated torque and horsepower do not appear to be directly
related to the actual available power from the engine. Therefore, the manu-
facturer's rated power for 1972 model engines generally does not help in
determining whether an engine is operating properly. An approximation which
had been developed from a Chevrolet 350 engine and used in a couple of pre-
vious projects is as follows:
Maximum Power = 0.000116 x CID x Rated RPM
Maximum Torque = 0.715 x CID
The power values for Engine 20, a 1972 Ford 300 engine, were as follows:
Mfg. Rated Measured Approximation
Power 165 @ 3600 118 @ 3400 125 @ 3600
Torque 294 220 215
The measured values were less than 75 percent of the manufacturer's rated
values, but did not differ much from the approximation. Therefore, it
appears that this engine had a reasonable power output.
Manual Choke Operation - In keeping with the procedure prescribed by the
EPA Project Officer, the choke was opened and remained open after the auto-
matic cycle control system was engaged. With this method, there was 3ome
noticeable engine hesitation during the first several accelerations.
Engine 18 - The 1972 Chevrolet 350 engine has a four-barrel carburetor,
and, when the secondaries came in, the immediate effects were dramatic. For
example, with steady increase in throttle at 2500 rpm, the torque would
increase in direct relation to the throttle setting until a point was reached
at which the torque would suddenly double in value. This point was that at
which the secondaries began to open. This condition initially made it dif-
ficult to meet the cycle parameters. However, by appropriate adjustment of
the system gain control, acceptable cycle parameter values were attained.
The gain setting was different for transient cycle Tests 18-1 and 18-3. The
composite results for these tests, however, were in very good agreement.
31
-------
Engine 20 - With the 1972 Ford 300 engine> a malfunction occurred which
resulted in soir3 potentially interesting results. The idle mixture, as
initially adjusted, produced about 3 percent CO. From the emissions results
during the initial testing, however, it became apparent that some change had
occurred. It was found that the spring on the idle mixture adjusting screw
was collapsed; allowing vibration to change the mixture setting. Based on a
measured CO value of about 0.2 percent, the adjusting screw had apparently
vibrated to a very lean position. The first two transient tests (20-1 and
20-2) had apparently been run at that condition. Tests 20-3 and 20-4 were
then run after readjusting the idle mixture. The results of these tests are
summarized as follows:
Average Values
Lean-
Test
20-1 & -2
Tuned-
Test
20-1 & -2
Lean-Tuned/
Cold
Hot
Composite
Cold
Hot
Composite
Tuned, in %
HC, gAW-hr
16.1
" 12.0
12.6
14.5
9.3
10.1
+25%
CO, gAW-hr
96.
76.
79.
110.
93.
95.
-17%
CO2, g/kw-hr
960.
911.
918.
944.
934.
935.
-2%
NOjj, g/kW-hr
8.6
10. y
10.5
10.6
11.8
11.6
-9%
SFC, kw/kW-hr
0.37
0.34
0.34
0.37
0.35
0.35
-3%
WORK, kW-hr
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.4
6.3
6.3
0%
POWER, kW
19.6
19.5
19.5
19.5
19.4
19.4
+1%
IDLE CO, %
-0.2
-3.5
The very lean mixture condition produced 25 percent higher HC and 17 percent
lower CO than was produced with the tuned-up idle mixture condition. The N0X
value, however, was reduced by only 9 percent at the lean mixture condition
relative to the tuned-up condition.
The N0X values per bag, for the hot transient, were as follows:
NOx in Grams for the Hot Transient
Bag
1
2
3
4
Total
Lean
3
13±1
48±3
5
69
Tuned
5
15
49±4
5_
74
L-T
-2
-2
-1
0
-5
These data illustrate that Bag 3 is the major contributor to the total NOx
(about two-thirds of the total). These data further illustrate that the
major contributors to the N0X composite test differences were Bags 1 and 2 of
the hot transient (about 80 percent of the total differences). Not shown is
that the HC emission rates for Bag 3 were essentially unchanged for the lean
and tuned conditions.
Bag 3 primarily involves significant speed and load operating conditions.
Therefore, it appears that idle mixture adjustment has minimal effect at
significant speed and load operating conditions, and as a result has
32
-------
relatively minor effect on total composite N0X emission rates.
Engine 22 - The 1973 GMC 366 engine was initially evaluated as Engine 11.
Due to concerns over the N0X emission rates, this engine was subjected to an
extensive tune-up and was retested as Engine 22. Problems were encountered
with the accelerator pump, in an initial check-out run, and these problems
were resolved.
Following repair of the accelerator pump, two runs were conducted that
did not meet the si^ecified cycle statistics. This was found to be associated
with the fact that this was a relatively high-speed, governed engine. The
procedure required that all speeds higher than the governed speed be attained
by motoring the engine. The dynamometer used in this project, however, had
a maximum motoring speed of 3500 rpm. Therefore, motored speeds above 3500
rpm were unattainable, and this had a significant effect on the speed
standard error and intercept. This deviation in motored speed, however, was
previously found to have a negligible effect on emissions. By careful
adjustment of the controls, it was possible to obtain statistics meeting the
requirements.
The results of the various evaluations conducted with this engine are
summarized as follows:
Transient
Nine-
-Mode
Engine Number
lla
22^
22
lla
22
I-IC, yAW-hr
15.0
9.3
7.8
14.7
8.6
CO, g/kw-hr
230.
193.
175.
185.
132.
N0X r gAw-hr
3.7
6.2
6.4
5.5
5.6
SFC, kgAW-hr
0.42
0.42
0.41
0.44
0.40
a Idle mixture set very lean and the accelerator pump was probably not
functioning.
k Accelerator pump was not functioning (Test 22-00).
Indications are that the large difference in HC emissions, between configur-
ation 11 and 22, was due to the very lean idle mixture setting. The reason
for the large difference in N0X emissions was not apparent.
33
-------
VIII. NEW CURRENT TECHNOLOGY ENGINES
Three different 1978 and 1979 engines were tested for purposes of corre-
lation with the Environmental Protection Agency. One of the three engines
was tested three different times. Emissions are reported for transient and
nine-mode tests.
A. Engines Tested
Three 19 78 and 1979 engines were evaluated for the purpose of correla-
tion with data generated on the same engines by the EPA. All of these
engines were provided to this laboratory in crates and were designated as
being ready for testing. All preparations on these engines, other than minor
tune-up, were conducted prior to shipment to this laboratory.
On these three engines, the idle speed, idle mixture, ignition timing,
and dwell were checked, and were adjusted to manufacturer's specifications
when necessary. These engines are identified in Table 8.
TABLE 8. NEW 1978 AND 1979 ENGINES TESTED
Engine Description
Engine
Number
ia
6a
7
8a
10
Model
Year
1978
1978
1978
1978
1979
Make
IHC
IHC
Chevrolet
IHC
GMC
CID
404
404
454
404
292
Serial Number
404-053483
404-053483
T364776
404-053483
a Engines 6 & 8 are retests of Engine 1.
B. Emissions Test Results
Summaries of the emissions test results and copies of the computer
printouts are given in Appendix F. Brief summaries of the results are given
in Table 9.
An item of interest in these data is the significantly lower HC
emissions in the nine-mode tests, relative to the transient tests. With the
older engines evaluated in this project, the HC emissions in the nine-mode
tests were generally equal to or greater than the HC emissions in the tran-
sient tests.
34
-------
The IHC 404 engine was evaluated at three different times as part of a
program to establish correlation between results obtained by this laboratory
and the EPA. Engine test designations for these evaluations were Engine 1, 6
and 8. The minimum, average and maximum values for these three evaluations
are included in Table 9.
TABLE 9. SUMMARY OF THE NEW ENGINE TEST RESULTS
Transient Test
Emissions and Fuel, gAW-hr
Engine
Make
& CID
Testa
HC
CO
-H2&-
Fuel
lb
IHC
404
Tran.
4.0
96
7.6
414
N-M
1.8
45
7.1
460
6b
IHC
404
Tran.
6.0
103
8.5
398
N-M
1.6
42
8.5
390
7
CHEV.
454
Tran.
3.3
68
8.7
371
N-M
0.8
27
7.8
394
8^
IHC
404
Tran.
5.1
78
6.7
385
N-M
1.5
20
5.3
418
10
GMC
292
Tran.
12.6
122
17.8
385
N-M
5.4
67
17.7
424
Avg.
of
Engine 1,
6, 8
Tran.
5.0
92
7.6
399
Min.
of Engine 1,
6, 8
Tran.
4.0
78
6.7
385
Max.
of Engine 1,
6, 8
Tran.
6.1
103
8.5
414
Avg.
of
Engine 1,
6, 8b
N-M
1.6
36
7.0
422
Min.
of Engine 1,
6, 8b
N-M
1.5
20
5.3
390
Max.
of Engine 1,
6, 8b
N-M
1.8
45
8.5
460
Avg.
of Tran/N-Min %c
320
230
107
93
Min.
of Tran/N-Min %
230
180
101
91
Max.
of Tran/N-Min %
410
260
111
95
^ran. = Transient N-M = Nine-Mode
^Engines 6 & 8 are retests of engine 1.
cAverage of the percentage for each engine.
35
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 31, Tuesday, February 13, 1979.
Note: The above proposed rules for heavy-duty emissions regulations,
with some modifications, were subsequently issued as Subpart N to Part 86
in the Federal Register, Monday, January 21, 1980.
2. Cox, Timothy P., Glenn W. Passavant and Larry D. Ragsdale, "1969 Heavy-
Duty Engine Baseline Program and 1983 Emissions Standards Development."
Technical Report, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, May 1979.
3. Cox, Timothy et al, "1972-73 Heavy-Duty Engine Baseline Program and NOx
Emission Standard Development." Technical Report No. EPA-AA, SDSB-81-01.
March 1981.
4. Telephone conversation between Sherrill Martin and Richard Burgeson on
December 13, 1978.
5. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 85, Subpart H.
6. Federal Register, Vol. 42, No. 174, Thursday, September 8, 1977.
7. Memorandum from Charles Urban and Harry Dietzmann that was transmitted to
the EPA on August 10, 1979.
8. Telephone conversation between Sherrill Martin and Timothy Cox on
September 5, 1979.
36
-------
APPENDICES
A - General Information
B - HC and CO Baseline Test Results
C - N0X Baseline Test Results
D - NOx Baseline Data Computer Printouts
E - N0X" Baseline Engine Tune-up Record Sheets
P - Test Results On New Engines
-------
APPENDIX A
GENERAL INFORMATION
A-l - Revised Scope of Work
A-2 - Original Scope of Work
A-3 - CVS Nine-Mode Test Procedure
A-4 - Program TCP for Determination
of Test Acceptability
-------
APPENDIX A-l. REVISED SCOPE OP WORK
Contract No- 68-03-2603
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
The contractor shall test gasoline and diesel-type heavy-duty
engines by the test procedures authorized below. The engines will be
supplied by EPA.
A minimum of 22 gasoline engines and a minimum of 23 diesel engines
shall be tested. In lieu of engines, up to 20 vehicles may be supplied
by EPA. The contractor shall remove, test, and replace the engines.
Vehicles shall be returned in the same general condition as received.
The Test Procedures, Equipment Specifications, and Calibration
Procedures are outlined below. The detailed procedures shall be found
in: Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 86, Subpart D,
"For 1979 and Later Model Year Heavy-Duty Engines", as published in the
Federal Register, September 8, 1977, pp. 45154 - 45174; revised Title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 86, Subpart P and N, "For 1984
and Later Model Year Heavy-Duty Engines", as published in the Federal
Register, January 21, 1980, pp. 4136 - 4227; and "Draft Recommended
Practice for Measurement of Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from
Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Under Transient Conditions", EPA Technical
Report No. SDSB-79-18, by E. Danielson, April 1979. Deviations from the
procedures referenced above, substitution of additional procedures within
the scope of technical direction, or substitution of procedures which
supersede those procedures referenced above, shall be made only with
prior approval of the EPA Project Officer.
* Test Procedure
1. Receipt of Engine
a. The EPA Project Officer shall specify which engines are to be
tested.
b. Engines will be furnished by EPA to the test facility. The
contractor shall examine the engines for damage during shipment and will
verify that the engine delivered is the same as specified by the EPA
Project Officer. EPA will ensure that the contractor, at any time, has
at least one engine on hand for testing until the total quantity of
engines has been tested.
2. Engine Adjustment
a. All new engines shall be checked to determine:
1) Idle speed;
2) Rated power;
3) Rated speed;
4) Rated torque.
A-2
-------
These checks shall be made with the engine warmed up. If the items
checked are outside of the recommended specifications, the EPA Project
Officer shall be notified. Subsequent action may include troubleshoot-
ing, engine adjustment, and mechanical repair.
b. All in-use engines shall be checked for operational integrity
using procedures specified by the EPA Project Officer. These checks
shall include, at a minimum:
1) Visual inspection, including verification that the carburetor
and distributor are the proper parts for the engine being tested;
2) Cylinder compression check (warm).
The criteria against which the engine's integrity shall be checked
shall be specified by the EPA Project Officer, who shall be notified if
the engine fails checkout, and who shall direct any subsequent action.
Subsequent action may include mechanical repair or engine rejection.
c. Following initial checkout, all in-use engines shall be sub-
jected to major tune-up. What constitutes a major tune-up shall be
prescribed by the EPA Project Officer, as will guidance and assistance
should tune-up specifications be unattainable. Major tune-ups may
require at a minimum:
1) Replacement and/or adjustment of ignition-related parts;
2) Possible mechanical repair;
3) Recording of "recommended" and "as-tune" specifications in a
format to be specified by the EPA Project Officer.
3. Steady-State Emission Testing
a. Following engine checkout and any required adjustments, all
engines shall be tested per Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 86, Subpart D, using a modified version of the "9-mode" Test Procedure
for Gasoline Engines, or the "13-mode" Test Procedure for Diesel Engines.
b. A total of two (2) corrplete tests are required with a third
test recommended if emission results from the first two tests are inexplicably
variable.
c. These steady-state tests may, at the discretion of the contractor
and the EPA Project Officer, serve as further checks on engine integrity,
over and above those specified above.
4. Transient Emission Testing
a. Transient emission testing shall be conducted and validated
per Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 86, Subpart N. In
summary, such testing shall consist of:
1) Generation of maximum torque curve (mapping);
A-3
-------
2) Generation of the transient reference cyclef
3) Pre-test engine soak or cool down;
4) Cold-start transient cycle, lasting approximately
twenty (20) minutes during which emissions are sampled;
5) A twenty (20) minute soak with the engine off;
6) Hot-start transient cycle, lasting approximately twenty (20)
minutes, during which emissions are sampled;
7) Emission calculations and test cycle validation.
b. A total of two (2) complete and valid tests are required, with
a third test recommended if emission results from the first two are
inexplicably variable. Generation of an engine map and the reference
cycle need only be done once per engine, however.
5. Additional Testing
a. Limited additional testing for both research purposes and for
checks on engine integrity may be required at the direction of the EPA
Project Officer. Such additional testing may include idle emission
tests, emission testing over alternate transient cycles, and the samp-
ling of additional gases and exhaust matter during the standard tests.
6. Release of Engine
a. Upon completion of testing the contractor shall notify
the EPA Project Officer for approval to discontinue testing. After such
approval is given, the Project Officer will arrange to assume custody
within a reasonable time.
II. Specifications and Equipment Requirements
1. Test Cycle
a. The test cycle is defined in terms of "normalized" speed and
power. For speed, 0% indicates idle rpm and 100% is usually the man-
ufacturers rated rpm for maximum power. For torque, 0% is no torque and
100% is the maximum torque which the engine can produce at a given
engine speed, other values are linearly related to the two set points.
Negative values indicate an engine speed below idle or a motoring condition.
b. The test cycle is defined by a curve through the speci-
fied speed and torque sequences.
2. Dynamometer and Engine Equipment
a. The dynamometer shall be capable of performing the test cycle
within the specified tolerances. The engine cooling system shall main-
tain (approximately) the manufacturers specified operating temperature.
-------
b. Engine speed and torque shall be continuously recorded. In
addition, the deviation from the test cycle shall also be shown to
verify test validity.
3. Exhaust Gas Sampling System and Analyzers
a. The sampling system and gas analyzer shall conform to the
specifications found in the appropriate Subparts of Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations, Part 86, or as specified by the EPA Project
Officer.
4. Analytical Gasses, Fuel, Calibration Procedure
a. The analytical gases, fuels, and calibration procedures shall
conform to the specifications found in the appropriate Subparts of Title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 86, or as specified by the
EPA Project Officer.
III. Additional Testing (Diesel Engines)
1. Particulates and Hydrocarbons
a. In addition to gaseous emission measurements, measurements of
diesel particulate emissions shall be made during each transient emission
test.
b. Both particulate and hydrocarbon measurements shall be made in
accordance with "Draft Recommended Practice for Measurement of Gaseous
and Particulate Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Under Transient
Conditions," EPA Technical Report No. SDSB-79-18, by E. Danielson, April
1979, or as directed by the EPA Project officer.
c. High-volume sampling of diesel particulates shall be made
during all transient emission testing using equipment and procedure to
be agreed upon between EPA and the contractor. High-volume particulate
samples shall be stored in accordance with accepted scientific practice
and shall be made available for distribution to outside laboratories.
2. Smoke
a. Continuous traces of exhaust opacity (approximately 6 inches/
minute) shall be supplied for all transient diesel testing. An in-line
smokemeter shall be used. Smokemeter malfunctions shall not void
the exhaust emissions tests.
IV. Data Submission
1. Data Submission
a. Test results shall be submitted in two manners, packets and
punched (and interpreted) 80-column cards. Formats for these submis-
sions shall be specified by the EPA Project Officer.
-------
b. Teat results for each engine shall be submitted within a
reasonable time after completion of each engine.
c. Strip charts and test notes shall be retained and submitted as
requested by the Project Officer.
A-6
-------
APPENDIX A-2. ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK
Exhibit A Contract No, 68-03-2603
Scope of Work
(8 Pages)
The contractor shall test gasoline and Diesel type heavy duty eagines
by the transient test procedure outlined below. A tentative list of
engines appears as Table A-l. Seven gasoline and ten Diesel engines
will be from in-use vehicles. The remaining engines will be in new, or
nearly new condition.
A minimum of 25 engines of each type shalli be tested. Each engine
test will require development of an engine torque curve, a high and low
speed idle emission check, and a Cold/Hot Start Transient Emission Test.
One replicate of the transient test shall be run. In-use engines shall
be tested first in "as-received" condition; a tune-up may be required
followed by additional testing.
The detailed Test Procedures, Equipment Specifications and Calibra-
tion procedures follow. References have been made to EPA'e Motor Vehicle
Engine Test Procedure, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part
86 (e.g., AO CFR §86.XXX); and also to proposed 40 CFR Part 86, Subpart
D for 1979 heavy duty engines; see 41 Federal Register 21292-21313, 24
Kay 1976.
I. Test Procedures
0. Overview: Figure 1 is a schematic of the' test sequence. It
shows the different test sequences for new and in-use engines. The
items in these sequences, the equipment to be used and the calibra-
tion procedures to be followed are described below.
1. Receipt of engine:
(a) EPA will, for each engine, transmit a written test order
to the contractor containing the engine description and necessary
specifications.
(b) Engines will be furnished by EPA to the test facility.
The contractor shall examine the engines for damage during shipment
and will verify that the engine delivered is the same as specified
in the test order. EPA will insure that the contractor, at any
time, has at least one engine on hand for testing until the total
quantity of engines has been tested.
2. Engine adjustment:
(a) All new engines, shall be checked to determine:
-------
Scope of Work
Page 2
Contract No. 68-03-2603
(1) Idle speed
(2) Idle CO exhaust concentration
(3) Timing (Gasoline engines only)
(A) Dwell (Gasoline engines only)
These checks shall be made with the engine warmed up.
(b) If the items checked are outside of the specifications on
the test order, they shall be adjusted to fall within the specifica-
tion range
3. Engine mapping
(a) Gasoline engines shall be warmed-up as follows:
(1) Idle - 1 minute
(2) 2000 rpm at 10% torque - A minutes
(3) 2000 rpm at 55% torque - 35 minutes
(b) Diesel engines shall be varmed-up by idling for 2 minutes
and then by operating at rated speed, maximum power for 10 minutes.
(c) A curve of maximum torqua versus speed shall be developed
for engine speeds of -22% to +150% (percent speed is defined in the
item on engine cycles) . Readings will be taken from the lowest to
highest speeds in 100 rpm increments. Duplicate readings are then
taken going from highest to lowest speeds. The maximum torque
curve is derived from the average of the two readings. If an
engine will not develop any torque at a required speed, that read-
ing is to be omitted.
A. Pre-test soak:
(a) The engine shall soak at an ambient temperature of 25C +5
for a period of 8 to 36 hours prior to the cold start test.
(b) If the engine soaks for core than 36 hours, it shall be
warmed up, 3(a) or (b), and allowed to soak for 8 to 36 hours prior
to the cold start test.
5. Cold start CVS test:
(a) The cold start CVS test is a continuous test consisting
of 5 five minute segments in series. Exhaust mass emissions are
determined separately for each segment. Engine start-up is in-
cluded in the initial segment.
A-8
-------
Scope of Work
Page 3
Contract No. 68-03-2603
(b) All equipment is to be in a stand-by or operating mode prior
to the start of the test.
(c) Start the engine, following the manufacturers procedure
either using the engine starter or by operating the
dynamometer at the engine cranking speed. Exhaust gas sampling is to
begin when cranking starts.
(d) Once the engine starts, the operation cycle begins. The
engine must be operated over the specified sequence of engine speed and
torque, within the tolerances. See Item 11.
(e) At the end of each five minute segment, terminate the previous
sampling and begin taking a new sample. Analyze sample bags as soon as
possible, but in no case more than 20 minutes after the sample has been
collected. Collect and calculate mass emissions in accordance with 40 CFR
Part 86, Subpart B.
(f) At the end of the fifth sample collection period, stop sampling
and then turn the engine off.
6. Pre-hot start soak: Allow the engine to soak for 15 minutes prior
to the hot start test.
7. Hot start test: The hot start test consists of repeating the first
segment of the cold start test. Sample collection includes engine
starting but does not include engine shut down.
8. Idle test:
(a) Allow the engine to idle following the hot start test.
(b) Measure HC, CO and JJOx in the undiluted exhaust with "gararge
type" instruments. Also measure undiluted CO^ using a "laboratory
grade" analyzer.
(c) Simultaneously with the undiluted exhaust measurements,
collect dilute exhaust and background samples using the CVS. Analyze
for HC, CO, CO2 and NOx.
(d) Increase engine speed to 2500 rpm (+ 100). If 2500 rpm
cannot be obtained, then use maximum obtainable speed. Repeat the
procedure in (b) and (c).
(e) Using the ratio of C0„ undiluted/diluted calculate the undiluted
concentrations of HC, CO and NOx from the CVS results.
Replication: Repeat items (4). through (8) to obtain a second set
of test results. This completes the entire test sequence for new
engines.
A-9
-------
Scope of Work
Page A
Contract No. 68-03-2603
10. In-use engines; tune-ups:
(a) After running a replicate test on an in-use engine (in
"as-received" condition) check the quantities listed in item 2 (a).
(b) If the quantities are within the test order specifications,
testing of the in-use engine is complete.
(c) If the quantities are not within the tolerances on the
order, proceed to adjust and/or tune-up the engine to meet the test
order specifications. After the engine has been adjusted and/or
tuned up, proceed with items 3 through 9 as if it were a new engine.
11. Release of engine: Upon completion of testing the contractor
shall notify EPA. EPA will arrange to assume custody within a
reasonable time.
II. Specifications and Equipment Requirements
12. Test Cycle:
(a) The test cycle is defined in terms of "normalized" speed
and power. For speed, 0% indicates idle rpm and 100% is the manu-
facturers rated rpm for maximum povar. For torque, 0% is no torque
and 100% is the maximum torque which-1 the engine can produce at a
given engine speed. Other values are linearly related to the two
set points. Negative values indicate an engine speed below idle or
a motoring condition (which will be run with the throttle closed).
(b) The test cycle is defined by a curve through the speci-
fied speed and torque sequences.
The tolerances around each curve are defined as follows:
(1) Speed: The upper limit is 25 rpm higher than the highest
point on the curve within 1 second of the given time. The lower
limit is 25 rpm lower than the lowest point on the curve within 1
second of the given time. On speed accelerations, deviations of
speed below the reference speed are acceptable if the engine is
operated at WOT until the engine speed agrees with the reference
speed.
(2) Torque: The upper limit is 57, or 30 ft-lbs (20 ft-lbs
for gasoline engines), whichever is less, greater than the highest
point on the curve within 1 second of the given time, the lower
limit is 5% or 30 ft-lbs (20 ft-lbs for gasoline engines), which-
ever is less, lower than the lowest point on the curve within 1
second of the given time. The torque tolerances do not apply for
conditions of decreasing torque with simultaneously decreasing
speed for engine motoring.
A-10
-------
Scope of Work
Page 5
Contract No. 68-03-2603
(c) The test cvcles will be provided to the contractor withii
one (1) month after the effective date of the contract.
13. Dynamometer and engine equipment:
(a) The dynamometer shall be capable of performing the
test cycle withing the specified tolerances. The engine cooling
system shall maintain (approximately) the manufacturers specified
operating temperature.
(b) Engine speed and torque shall be continuously recorded to
within + 1% of the rated speed and maximum torque. In addition,
the deviation from the test cycle shall also be shown to verify
test validity.
14. Idle check equipment: "Garage type" instruments (Sun, EPA-
75; and Teeco, Model 8A; or equivalents) shall be used to obtain
idle readings. NDIR (Nondispersive infra-red) detection shall be
used for HC and CO, chemiluminescent shall be used for NOx. The
"laboratory grade" CO- analyzer shall conform to proposed 40 CFR
§86.316-79.
15. Fuel: See proposed 40 CFR §86.307.
16. Analytical Gases: See proposed 40 CFR §86.308. Exception,
the 0% Oj oxygen interference check gas is not required.
17. Analyzers: See proposed 40 CFR §§86.316 to 86.318.
18. Exhaust gas sampling system: See 40 CFR §86.109. Flow rates
may have to be increased to accommodate the quantities of exhaust
gases generated.
19. Exhaust gas analytical system schematic: See 40 CFR §86.111,
paragraph (a).
III. Calibrations
20. Calibrations: See proposed 40 CFR §§86.319 and 86.320; 86.326
and 86.327; and 86.330 to 86.333. Also see 40 CFR §86.119.
IV. Data Submission
21. Data submission:
(a) Test results shall be submitted in two manners, packets
and punched (and interpreted) 80 column cards. Formats for these
submissions shall be specified by the project officer within two
months after contract award.
A-ll
-------
Scone of Work ^ouureCt nu, ua uj ^uuj
Page 6
(b) Information to be submitted shall include (as applicable):
Engine Identification
Test Numbers, Dates
Idle RPM (as recieved/adjusted)
Timing (as received/adjusted)
Dwell (as received/adjusted)
Torque curve data
Idle Emissions HC, CO, NOx (as received/adjusted)
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature
Analyzer calibration curves
CVS Test data, recorded for each segment:
Inlet air temperature average for wet
and dry bulbs
CVS inlet temperature, PDP only
CVS flow and raw data
Background and Sample bag concentrations
of HC, CO, C02 and NOx including zero and
span readings and gas concentrations
Diesel engine test shall include HFID
analyzer data
. Integrated horsepower-hours
Calculated emissions in grams, grams/mile,
grams/hp-hr, grans/lb fuel, grams/kw-hr,
grams/km and graos/kg fuel for each segment
(c) Strip charts and test notes shall be retained and submitted
as requested \y the project officer.
A-12
-------
Scope of KorV. contract No. bb-UJ-^bUJ
Page 7
Table A-l
Tentative Engine List
Manufacturer CID 0 New Engines ft In-Use 8 Prototypes
Gasoline Engines
CHRYSLER
.318
1 to .2
0 to
1
t
360
1 to 2
0 to
1
Undetermined
440
1 to 2
1
possibly
GENERAL MOTORS
350
1 to 3
1
LDT
400
1
0 to
1
engines
FORD
300
1
0 to
1
with
351
1 to 3
1
catalysts
400
1
0 to
1
will
196
0
to
1
0
to
1
be
304
0
to
1
0
to
1
tested
345
1
0
to
1
+
391
0
to
1
0
to
1
400
0
to
1
0
to
1
446
0
to
1
0
to
1
TOTAL GASOLINE TO BE TESTED 15
Diesel Engines
CUMMINS 855 1 to 3 1 to 2
1150 1 to 3 1 to 2
CATERPILLAR 636 1 to 3 1 to 2
MACK 672 1 to 3 1 to 2
GENERAL MOTORS
568
1
to
2
0
to
1
552
1
to
2
0
to
1
736
1
to
3
1
to.
.2
TOTAL DIESEL TO BE TESTED 15 10
A-13
-------
Contract No. 68-03-2603
Scope of Work
Page 8
Figure 1
Test Sequence
New Engines
I
Ill-use Engines
1
1. Receive Engine
2. Adjust if
required
I
3.
Engine Map
*
4.
Pre-test Soak
5.
Cold Start CVS
6.
Pre-hot Start Soak
7.
Hot Start Test
8.
Idle Check
*
~ 9.
Replicate j
r\
Yes
10. Tune-up needed?
No
11. Release Engine
A-14
-------
APPENDIX A-3. CVS NINE-MODE TEST PROCEDURE
Note: Record Data on Sheet DD-2 for WARM-UP through Test
PRE-TEST
1. Bleed Flotron
2. Dyno Control to MANUAL, set SPEED SET to 1500 RPM (-27.0 on dial)
3. Calibrate ACTUAL TORQUE
4. Calibrate ACTUAL RPM
5. Zero Flotron with ATTENUATOR set on lOv
WARM-UP (Evacuate bags during warm-up)
6. Turn WATER, IGN, BATTERY CHARGER and CVS on
7. Start Engine and run No Load at 1500^200 RPM for 1 minute
8. Run at 1500 rpm and 14±1 inch-Hg until Oil Temp is 200°F
MAX. LOAD
9. Go to WOT at 2000 rpm
10. Push Filter Buttons, start Chart (1 cm/min) and record data
during minutes 1 to 2.
11. Go to 2000 rpm and 14+1 inch-Hg and start NINE-MODE TEST
NINE-MODE TEST (Start Directly from MAX. LOAD)
12. In 5 minutes or less, calculate modes and set up for running
test and read: Baro, "Hg D.B. Temp., °F ,R.H.
13. Go to Mode 1 and Stabilize in one minute
14. Start Bag and Charts and Run 5 minutes (300 seconds)
15. Stop Bag and Charts and Record CVS Data
16. Repeat Steps 14 thru 16 for Modes 2 thru 9
Read: Baro, "Hg , D.B. Temp., °F , R.H.
17. Go to 14±1 "Hg if testing is to continue or shut down
18. Assemble all data into a labeled envelope and deliver for
processing.
A-15
-------
APPENDIX A-4. PROGRAM TCP FOR DETERMINATION
OF TEST ACCEPTABILITY
FTN,L
PROGRAM TCP
C»»»»»THIS PROGRAM CALCULATES THE" PARAMETERS AND ACCEPTABILITY FOR A RUN
C LATEST PROGRAM REVISION - AUGUST 27. 1979
DIMENSION TC(600)*SC(600)* TP(60 0)»SP(600),TR(60 0)»IDTEST(71)
1 tITT(7)
DATA STX*STY«STX2*STY2*STXY»SSX»SSY»SSX2fSSY?*SSXY*SHX»SHY»SHX2»
1 SHY2.SH*Y/15»0./
M=0
N=0
READ(10 »13 >ITT.ITID
13 FORMAT(7A1 , 11 )
WRITE(6~60)ITT.ITID
60 FORMAT(lH0.30X.7Al.il)
READ(10*15)IDTEST
15 FORMAT (71A1)
WRITE(6»16)IDTEST
16 FORMAT(1H0.71A1)
READ(10.7)TCL.SCL»SRL»TRL.TPL.TCH.SCH.SRH?TRH.V0IDA
7 FORMAT(10F8.3)
READ(10.28)VOIDB.VOIDC.VOIDD.VOIDE.TPH
28 FORMAT(5F8.3)
READ(10,?7)TCAL.TMAX»SCAL.SMAX.SIDL.HMAX.PTS
27 FORMAT(7F8.0)
WRITE(6*11)TCL.TCH.SCL.SCH.SRL.SRH.TRL.TRH.TPL.TPH
11 FORMAT(1H0.10F8.3)
WRITE(6»41)TCAL*TMAX»SCAL*SMAX»SIDL»HMAX»PTS
41 FORMAT(1H .7F8.0)
TCF=TMAX/(TCH-TCL)
TRF=TCAL/(TRH-TRL)
SCF=(SMAX-SIDL)/(SCH-SCL)
SRF=SCAL/(SPH-SRL)
TPCUT=(TPH~TPL)*.99+TPL
NPT=PTS
DO 6 J=1 .2
READ(9*1)(TC(I)»SC(I)»SR(I)»TR(I).TP(I).1 = 1»NPT)
1 FORMAT (25X.5F6,0.25X.'5F6.0)
DO 8 1=1,MPT
TC(I)=(TC(I)-TCL)»TCF
SC(I)=(SC(I>-SCL)*SCF+SIDL
SR(I)-SR(I)*SRF
8 TR(I)=TR(I)#TPF
DO 6 1=1.NPT
M=M+1
SSX=SSX+SC(I)
SSY=SSY+SP(I)
SSX2=SSX2+SC(I)»*2
SSY2=SSY2+SP(I>»»2
SSXY=SSXY+SC(I)«SR(I)
IF(ABS(TP(I)).GE.ABS(TPCUT).AND.TR(I).LT.TC(I))GO TO 6
IF(TC)GO TO 6
N=N+1
STX=STX+TC(I)
STY=STY+TP(I)
STX2=STX?+TC(I)»«2
STY2=STY2+TP(I)**2
-------
APPENDIX A-4 (Cont'd) . PROGRAM TCP FOR DETERMINATION
OF TEST ACCEPTABILITY
STXY=STXY+TC(I)»TR(I)
SHX=SHX+TC(I)*SC(I)
SHY=SHY+TR(I)*SR(I)
SHX2=SHX?+tTC(I)*SC(T))»»2
SHY?=SHY?+CTR(I)»SR(I))»»2
SHXY=SHXY+TC(I)«SC(I)*TR(I)«SR(I)
6 CONTINUE
TMN=STXY-STX#STY/N
TMD=STX2-STX»»2/N
TM=TMN/TMD
T8=STY/N-TM*STX/N
TR2=TMN»»2/(TMD»(STY2-STY»»2/N))
TSE=SQRT<
HMN=SHXY-SHX«SHY/N
HMD=SHX2-SHX»»2/N
hm=hmn/hmd
HB=(SHY/N-HM»SHX/N>/5?52.
HR2=HMN«»2/
-------
APPENDIX A-4 (Cont'd). PROGRAM TCP FOR DETERMINATION
OF TEST ACCEPTABILITY
>
i
t—•
V0
TCP SAMPLE PRINTOUT
C-START1
TEST 22-4 366 GASOLINE 03-17-R0
-.456 *.561 .PO* 6.813 .001 5.003 .000 4.010 .636 4.584
1249. 2A6. 7500. 4000. 550. 178. 57?.
CALCULATED VALUE? ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA-HOT
SPFED TORQUE POWFP SPEED TOROUE POWER
SE 93. 9.* 6.¥ 100. 13.* P.?
m .
-------
APPENDIX B
HC AND CO BASELINE TEST RESULTS
Table Engine
Number Number
B-l 2
B-2 3
B-3 4
B-4 5
B-5 9a
B-6 13
B-7 thru B-l2 All
B-l3 thru B-17 2 thru 9
Description
Summary of the Results
1969 IHC 304
1969 IHC 345
1969 IHC 304
1969 Chevrolet 366
1969 Chevrolet 366
1969 Ford 360
Transient Test Computer Printouts
Nine-Mode Computer Printouts
-------
TABLE B-l. ENGINE 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 IHC 304
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 2-1
TEST 2-
2
Cold
Hot.
Composite
Cold
Hot
Composite
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
16.79
12.21
12.86
14.74
10.53
11.13
12.00
CO,
g/kW-hr
176.52
170.82
171.63
163.75
154.77
156.05
163.84
CO2,
g/kW-hr
1019
983
988
998
961
966
977
NOX,
g/kW-hr
7.94
8.54
8.45
7.86
8.38
8.31
8.38
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0.425
0.407
0.410
0.410
0.390
0.393
0.402
WORK,
kW-hr
6.77
7.00
6.97
6.97
7.02
7.01
6.99
POWER, kW
20.89
21.60
21.50
21.50
21.60
21.64
21.57
NINE
MODE
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Test 2-1
Test 2-3
Average
. Engine:
1969
IHC 304 CID V-8 S/N 304-648048
HC,
g/kW-hr
25.774
25.472
25.623
Rated Power:
193 Hp at 4400 rpm
CO,
g/kW-hr
151.450
149.885
150.668
Rated Torque:
273 ft lbs
at 2800
rpm
C0?,
g/kW-hr
—
—
Measured
Idle Speed
:
700 rpm
NOX,
g/kW-hr
9.526
9.852
9.689
SFC,
kgAW-hr
0.430
0.431
0.431
Comments:
Rated Power and Torque are not applicable.
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel g/kma
HC,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
12.00
8.95
HC
29.85
8.06
CO,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
163.84
122.18
CO
407.56
110.01
NOX,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
8.38
6.25
NOX
20.85
5.63
SFC,
kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
0.402
0.661
FUEL CONS.
270.
WORK,
kW-hr (hp-hr)
6.99
9.37
a Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE
3-1 (Cont'd). ENGINE
2 SUMMARY
OF RESULTS
1969 IHC
304
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS b
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
Test 2-1
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
45.27
23.90
22.70
21.72
18.28
22.38
23.80
20.95
CO, gram
284.97
243.14
421.09
245.38
217.03
258.51
469.09
250.64
CO2 , gram
749.7
1486.4
3994.9
664.3
690.6
1451.0
4046.5
690.1
NOX, gram
2.54
10.87
36.48
3.85
3.68
12.08
40.27
3.72
FUEL, kg
0.423
0.613
1.491
0.353
0.343
0.608
1.532
0.363
KW-HR
0.53
1.29
4.33
0.62
0.61
1.39
4.36
0.63
TEST 2-2
HC, gram
47.14
25.88
20.24
9.50
12.90
15.26
22.80
22.88
CO, gram
290.11
261.19
429.23
160.78
160.17
202.49
469.96
253.18
CO2 gram
726.9
1528.1
3993.0
706.
689.7
1430.1
3934.9
685.2
NOX, gram
2.42
10.77
37.97
3.65
4.04
12.42
38.58
3.73
FUEL, kg
0.420
0.637
1.492
0.312
0.310
0.566
1.496
0.364
KW-HR
0.56
1.38
4.36
0.68
0.63
1.39
4.38
0.61
POWER
MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb) @
1
Temp. - 68
Baro.
- 29.21
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
195
2100
222
3100
211
4100
-
1200
199
2200
222
3200
208
4200
-
1300
203
2300
222
3300
205
4300
400
1400
207
2400
222
3400
202
4400
500
157
1500
210
2500
222
3500
198
4500
600
165
1600
213
2600
221
3600
194
4600
700
172
1700
216
2700
219
3700
190
4700
800
178
1800
218
2800
218
3800
185
4800
900
184
1900
219
2900
216
3900
0
4900
1000
189
2000
221
3000
214
4000
5000
b
Barometric Pressure: Test 2-1 = 745 mm Hg Test 2-2 = 743 mm Hg
-------
TABLE B-2. ENGINE 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 IHC 345
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Cold
TEST 3-1
Hot
Composite
Cold
TEST 3-2
Hot
Composite
Average
HC,
CO,
®2 ,
NOX,
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
14.46
108.85
1044
10.73
9.53
123.74
990
9.87
10.23
121.61
998
9.99
14.87
100.38
1096
11.22
7.60
133.33
988
10.29
8.64
128.62
1003
10.42
9.44
125.12
1001
10.21
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kgAW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.397
6.73
20.76
0.383
6.64
20.48
0.385
6.65
20.52
0.410
6.45
19.90
0.385
6.84
21.10
0.389
6.78
20.93
0.387
7.72
20.73
NINE MODE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
g/kW-hr
gAW-hr
kgAW-hr
Test 3-1
9.862
93.021
12.515
0.413
Test 3-2
9.059
80.898
12.283
0.413
Average
9.461
86.960
12.399
0.413
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1969 IHC 345 CID V-8 S/N 687073
Rated Power: 197 hp at 4000 rpm
RAted Torque: 304 ft lbs at 2200 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 470 rpm
Comments: Rated Power and Torque are not applicable.
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
gAq Fuel
gAma
HC, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 9.44 (7.04) HC
CO, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 125.12 (93.30) CO
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 10.21 (7.61) NOX
24.39
323.31
26.38
6.09
80.77
6.59
SFC, kgAW-hr (lb Ap-hr) 0.387 (0.636)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 6.72 (0.01)
FUEL CONS.
250.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd.) ENGINE 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 IHC 345
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS'
Cold Cycle
Test 3-1
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2, gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
Hot Cycle
NYNF
43.80
161.35
781.6
2.78
0.370
0.44
GO
u>
TEST 3-2
HC, gram 43.89
CO, gram 125.63
C02 gram 640.1
NOX, gram 1.92
FUEL, kg 0.308
KW-HR 0.21
LANF
22.45
165.06
1525.5
12.55
0.585
1.28
22.56
151.00
1552.6
12.60
0.587
1.27
LAF
19.42
304.37
4095.9
52.90
1.461
4.45
17.94
276.99
4247.7
54.26
1.494'
4.43
NYNF
11.70
102.28
624.8
4.05
0.259
0.56
11.54
93.89
631.9
3.56
0.257
0.54
NYNF
14.31
114.38
568.8
2.92
0.250
0.41
15.30
123.54
671.0
4.33
0.288
0.54
LANF
15.44
193.70
1388.9
10.51
0.549
1.29
11.80
223.47
1367.8
11.32
0.554
1.28
LAF
1931
371.31
4040.6
48.68
1.477
4.40
18.74
437.71
4103.9
50.67
1.529
4.47
NYNF
14.07
142.80
582.2
3.46
0.268
0.55
6.18
127.66
617.7
4.11
0.264
0.55
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. - 78
Baro. - 29.22
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
222
2100
250
3100
226
4100
-
1200
228
2200
250
3200
221
4200
-
1300
232
2300
249
3300
216
4300
400
169
1400
236
2400
248
3400
210
4400
500
178
1500
240
2500
246
3500
0
4500
600
187
1600
243
2600
244
3600
4600
700
195
1700
246
2700
242
3700
4700
800
203
1800
248
2800
239
3800
4800
900
210
1900
249
2900
235
3900
4900
1000
216
2000
250
3000
231
4000
5000
^Barometric Pressure; Test 3-1 * 745 mm Hg Test 3-2 = 748 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE B—3. ENGINE 4 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 IHC 304
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST
4-1
TEST
4-3
HC,
CO,
C02,
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
kgAW-hr
kW-hr
kw
Cold
14.65
154.98
923.
7.55
0.382
6.42
19.81
Hot
10.92
158.61
876.
7.48
0.366
6.64
20.48
Composite
11.45
158.09
883.
7.49
0.368
6.61
20.38
Cold
17.30
164.08
923.
8.19
0.390
6.36
19.62
Hot
11.77
158.53
882.
8.12
0.368
6.67
20.58
Composite
12.56
159.32
888.
8.13
0.371
6.63
20.44
Average
12.01
158.71
886.
7.81
0.370
6.62
20.41
NINE MODE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC.
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
TcqAW-hr
Test 4-3
26.773
167.466
8.798
0.423
Test 4-5
27.481
166.821
8.688
0.422
Average
27.127
167.144
8.743
0.423
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1969 IHC 304 CID V-8 S/N V304-735364
Rated Power: 193 hp at 4400 rpm
Rated Torque: 273 ft lbs at 2800 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 475 rpm
Comments: Rated Power and Torque are not applicable.
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
HC, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 12.01 (8.96) HC
CO, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 158.71 (118.35) CO
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 7.81 (5.82) NOX
qAq Fuel
32.46
428.95
21.11
gAma
7.64
100.93
4.97
SFC, k gAW-hr (lb/hp-hr)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
0.370 (0.609)
6.62 (8.88)
FUEL CONS.
235.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE B-3 (Cont'd). ENGINE 4 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 IHC 304
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTSb
Cold Cycle Hot Cycle
TEST 4-1
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
39.17
20.01
21.70
13.17
14.92
17.87
23.11
16.54
CO, gram
174.80
207.49
443.27
169.25
145.68
224.21
502.99
179.58
CO2/ gram
527.4
1279.1
3581.1
538.3
538.3
1203.8
3527.9
540.0
NOX, gram
1.32
8.93
35.52
2.71
2.72
8.40
35.62
2.87
FUEL, kg
0.292
0.526
1.370
0.267
0.257
0.508
1.384
0.276
KW-HR
0.28
1.26
4.36
0.52
0.51
1.26
4.35
0.51
TEST 4-3
HC, gram
43.08
24.33
23.41
19.13
17.60
18.92
23.63
18.40
CO, gram
170.15
227.98
467.62
177.07
153.14
224.03
499.52
180.97
C02, gram
475.4
1284.4
3579.9
529.1
519.4
1185.0
3641.0
539.9
NOX, gram
1.38
9.79
37.86
3.05
2.93
8.94
39.26
3.01
FUEL, kg
0.277
0.542
1.384
0.274
0.257
0.503
1.419
0.278
KW-HR
0.22
1.25
4.38
0.51
0.51
1.26
4.39
0.51
W
I
vj
POWER
MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb) 8
1 Temp.
0
CO
r-
\
Baro.
- 29.16
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
1100
191
2100
222
3100
217
4100
1200
196
2200
223
3200
215
4200
_ .
1300
201
2300
224
3300
212
4300
400
142
1400
205
2400
224
3400
209
4400
5.00
151
1500
208
2500
224
3500
205
4500
600
159
1600
212
2600
224
3600
201
4600
700
167
1700
214
2700
223
3700
197
4700
800
174
1800
217
2800
222
3800
192
4800
900
180
1900
219
2900
221
3900
0
4900
1000
186
2000
221
3000
219
4000
5000
^Barometric Pressure: Test 4-1 = 745 mm Hg
Test 4-3 = 746 mm Hg.
-------
TAB IE B-4. ENGINE 5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 5-3
TEST5-4
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
SFC, kg/kW-hr
WORK, kW-hr
POWER, kW
kW-hr Dev.b
Cold
20.04
292.29
982.
3.58
0.474
7.40
22.83
-4.7
Hot
16.26
251.48
942.
3.91
0.438
7.71
23.79
-0.8
Composite
16.80
257.31
948.
3.86
0.443
7.67
23.65
Cold
17.76
290.46
1060.
4.68
0.496
7.39
22.80
0,4
Hot
11.81
249.75
1015.
4.97
0.456
7.79
24.03
-4.8
Composite
12.66
255.57
1021.
4.93
0.462
7.73
23.85
Average
14.73
256.44
985.
4.40
0.453
7.70
23.75
NINE MODE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
kgAw-hr
Test 5-3 Test 5-4 Average
16.623
230.329
4.747
0.457
17.499
228.677
4.721
0.456
17.061
229.503
4.734
0.457
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1969 Chevrolet 366 CID V-8 S/N 3955274T
Rated Power: 235 hp at 4000 rpm
Rated Torque: 345 ft lbs at 2600 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 500 rpm
Comments: Rated Power and Torque are not applicable.
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel g/kma
HC,
gAW-hr (g/hp-hr)
14.73 (10.98)
HC
32.52
10.90
CO,
gAW-hr (g/hp-hr)
256.44 (191.23)
CO
566.09
189.68
NOX,
gAW-hr f g/hp-hr)
4.40 (3.28)
NOX
9.71
3.26
SFC,
kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
0.453 (0.745)
FUEL CONS.
—
355.
WORK,
kW-hr (hp-hr)
7.70 (10.33)
a Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle,
b Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
-------
TABLE B-4 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
TEST 5-3
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
41.40
40.63
40.25
25.97
44.74
25.69
35.27
19.56
CO, gram
222.47
476.02
1223.87
239.71
223.97
417.93
1098.81
197.22
c
-------
TABLE B-5. ENGINE 9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
CO21
NOX,
gAW-hr
g/kW-hr
gAW-hr
gAW-hr
Cold
12.96
187-74
947.
5.57
TEST 9-1
Hot
11.02
170.56
927.
5.68
Composite
11.30
173.01
930.
5 <66
Cold
16.24
195.95
970.
5.83
TEST 9-3
Hot
10.47
187.22
972.
6.14
Composite
11.29
188.47
972.
6.10
Average
11.42
180.74
959.
6.24
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kgAW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.404
7.65
23.60
0.388
7.66
23.63
0.390
7.66
23.63
0.419
7.59
23.42
0.410
7.53
23.23
0.411
7.54
23.26
0.403
7.56
23.31
NINE MODE
Test 9-2 Test 9-3 Average
HC, gAW-hr 17.665 17.077 17.371
CO, gAW-hr 263.118 287.357 275.24
CO2, gAW-hr
NOX, gAW-hr 3.564 3.334 3.449
SFC, kgAW-hr 0.495 0.504 0.500
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel gAnta
HC, gAW-hr fg/hp-hr) 11.42 (8.52) HC 28.34 8.25
CO, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 180.74 (134.78) CO 448.49 131.95
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 6.24 (4.65) NOX 15.48 4.29
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.403 (0.663) FUEL CONS. — 293.
WORK, kW-hr thp-hr) 7.56 (10.14)
31
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE B-B (Cont'd). ENGINE 9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 9-1
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.b
TEST 5-3
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.15
Speed
50.
1.006
.9973
5.
1144
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
55.
1.006
.9968
7.
1144
Torque
10.%
.926
.9158
5.9
1107
- -3.8
12.%
.857
.8521
6.4
1132
-4.5
Power
7.%
.958
.9597
1.7
1107
7.%
.923
.9468
1.4
1132
Speed
51.
1.002
.9972
16.
1144
53.
1.005
.9971
14.
1144
Torque
8.%
.927
.9474
2.8
1140
- -3.7
8.%
.896
.9335
3.2
1144
- -5.3
Power
5.%
.960
.9762
.8
1140
6. %
.934
.9669
.9
1144
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTSc
Test 9-1
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2, gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
TEST 9-3
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2 gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
Cold Cycle
NYNF
37.59
219.37
779.7
2.65
0.392
0.59
44.26
201.47
856.1
3.19
0.414
0.64
Hot Cycle
LANF
23.02
320.03
1621.9
9.02
0.696
1.46
25.38
320.38
1685.1
10.77
0.715
1.47
EAF
26.60
722.4
4069.9
27.98
1.667
5.02
41.00
785.16
4115.7
27.91
1.727
4.91
NYNF
11.90
173.99
757.4
2.9
0.337
0.58
12.71
180.91
711.9
2.43
0.327
0.57
NYNF
26.64
179.62
748.1
3.37
0.351
0.59
15.74
160.35
831.5
3.90
0.357
0,61
LANF
18.92
303.17
1578.6
8.06
0.667
1.46
18.24
297.27
1645.4
9.61
0.684
1.44
LAF
25.87
652.45
4050.1
29.03
1.626
5.02
29.54
778.22
4109.8
30.05
1.711
4.91
NYNF
12.95
170.74
719.5
3.00
0.324
0.58
15.40
174.71
736.2
2.67
0.334
0.58
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cSarometric Pressure; Test 9-1 = 748 mm Hg Test^-3 = 738 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE B-5 (Cont'd). ENGINE 9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1969 Chevrolet 366 CID No. 3955274T
Carburetor: Holley 4-Barrel list 4098-1
Distributor: Delco-Remy 1111337
Rated Power:
Maximum Torque:
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM 280 @ 2300
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM 172 @ 3700
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.) 75-105(91)
Idle RPM 500
POWER MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb)
@
Temp. - 77°
Baro. -
29.34
RPM
TQ_
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
- .
1100
237
2100
274
3100
271
4100
—
1200
241
2200
277
3200
270
4200
-
1300
242
2300
280
3300
266
4300
400
1400
240
2400
279
3400
261
4400
500
1500
244
2500
279
3500
254
4500
600
154
1600
255
2600
279
3600
250
4600
700
212
1700
260
2700
275
3700
244
4700
800
221
1800
265
2800
275
3800
237
4800
900
225
1900
269
2900
273
3900
230
4900
1000
233
2000
275
3000
272
4000
0
5000
-------
TABLE B-5 (Cont'd). ENGINE 9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Chevrolet 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
CO2 >
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
gAW-hr
g/kW-hr
Cold
16.27
207.52
978.
6.74
TEST 9-4
Hot
10.91
176.29
975.
7.01
Composite
11.68
180.75
975.
6.97
TEST
Cold
Hot
Composite
Averaae
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.427
7.53
23.23
0.406
7.46
23.01
0.409
7.47
23.04
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 9-4
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.**
Speed
53.
1.006
.9970
9.
1144
Cold Cycle
Torque
11.%
.870
.8847
5.8
1127
- -5.4
Power
7.%
.923
.9524
1-5
1127
Hot Cycle
Speed
55.
1.002
.9968
20.
1144
Torque
8.%
.893
.9450
3.3
1143
- -6.1
Power
5.%
.927
.9741
.9
1143
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS e
Cold Cycle
Test 9-4
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2, gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
NYNF
39.61
217.81
892.2
3.81
0.429
0.61
LANF
24.68
286.56
1611.3
10.10
0.724
1.45
EAF
45.19
795.13
4104.5
33.44
1.733
4.89
NYNF
12.93
162.10
748.8
3.36
0.329
0.57
NYNF
17.25
142.32
734.9
3.73
0.319
0.58
Hot Cycle
LANF
19.11
298.27
1586.1
10.22
0.667
1.44
LAF
28.90
750.12
4177.3
34.70
1.717
4.89
NYNF
16.18
124.65
774.8
3.64
0.322
0.56
3
Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by
e Barometric Pressures Test 9-4 = 740 mm Hg.
the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
-------
TABLE B-6. ENGINE 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Ford 360
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Cold
TEST 13-2
Hot
Composite
Cold
TEST 13-3
Hot
Composite
Averaae
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
11.00
160.41
1042.
6.56
0.419
8.28
25.54
7.28
123.05
985.
7.25
0.379
8.45
26.07
7.81
128.39
993.
7.15
0.385
8.43
25.99
12.72
164.78
1000. „
6.40
0.409
8.43
26.01
7.95
127.22
974.
7.03
0.378
8.45
26.07
8.63
132.59
978.
6.94
0.382
8.45
26.06
8.22
131.99
980.
6.97
0.382
8.45
26.05
NINE MODE
Test 13-1 Test 13-2 Test 13-5 Average
HC, g/kW-hr
CO, g/kW-hr
C°2' g/kW-hr
NOX, gAW-hr
SFC, kg/kW-hr
POWER, kW
14.39
80.21
1171.9
6.88
0.443
19.2
15.19
76.42
1279.9
7.42
0.422
19.2
14.76
72.72
1146.6
6.93
0.456
18.7
14.78
76.45
1199.
7.08
0.447
19.0
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 8.22 (6.13) HC 21.52 6.67
CO, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 131.99 (98.43) CO 345.52 107.14
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 6.97 (5.20) NOX 18.25 5.66
SFC, kgAW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.382 (0.628) FUEL CONS. — 311.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.45 (11.33)
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Ford 360
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 13-2
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
66.
9.%
7.%
70.
5.%
6.%
Slope
.990
.940
.973
.993
.947
.975
Corr. Coef.
.9958
.9310
.9640
.9953
.9734
.9864
Intercept
-3.
7.5
1.4
1.
8.6
1.8
Points Used
1144
1090
1090
1144
1129
1129
kW-hr Dev ^
• \J
TEST 13-3
Standard Error
63.
7.%
7.%
60.
6. %
6. %
Slope
.989
.953
.977
.991
.961
.987
Corr. Coef.
.9962
.9504
.9752
.9965
.9713
.9845
Intercept
4.
9.9
2.6
6.
7.4
1.4
Points Used ^
1144
1085
1085
1144
1143
1143
kW-hr Dev.
1.7 .
2.0 —
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS C
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
Test 13-2
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
31.96
21.30
26.82
11.04
12.00
14.50
24.82
CO, gram
199.72
255.65
706.76
166.71
118.04
159.23
615.42
CO2, gram
954.6
1814.4
4953.2
906.5
850.4
1822.7
4820.4
NOX, gram
2.39
8.74
38.86
4.37
4.04
11.20
41.91
FUEL, kg
0.432
0.720
1.938
0.379
0.339
0.668
1.849
KW-HR
0.60
1.60
5.35
0.73
0.74
1.62
5.34
TEST 13-3
HC, gram
42.63
23.80
28.26
12.51
13.26
15.81
26.88
CO/ gram
212.99
276.91
731.20
165.75
119.37
160.11
644.37
CO2 gram
904.7
1803.7
4856.4
859.9
836.4
1816.0
4744.5
NOX, gram
2.46
8.86
38.28
4.30
3.99
11.09
40.29
FUEL, kg
0.433
0.730
1.921
0.366
0.336
0.668
1.842
KW-HR
0.67
1.63
5.37
0.75
0.73
1.62
5.36
NYNF
10. 2(
147.0!
827.0
4.0!
0. 3'
0.7'
11.2!
151.0'
831.3
4.0:
Q.3<
0.1'
kTest kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
CBarometric Pressure: Test 13-2 = 745 mm Hg Test 13-3 = 745 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd)
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1969 Ford 360 CID Tag No. 9E13F
Carburetor:
Distributor:
Rated Power:
Maximum Torque:
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.)
Idle RPM
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @ Temp. - 81
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
1100
232
2100
-
1200
238
2200
•
1300
241
2300
400
193
1400
244
2400
500
213
1500
247
2500
600
219
1600
252
2600
700
229
1700
256
2700
800
225
1800
258
2800
900
226
1900
260
2900
1000
230
2000
262
3000
ENGINE 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Ford 360
Measured
265 @ 2200
158 § 4000
600
Baro. - 29.25
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
264
3100
246
4100
265
3200
242
4200
264
3300
236
4300
263
3400
232
4400
262
3500
228
4500
261
3600
224
4600
259
3700
219
4700
257
3800
216
4800
256
3900
213
4900
252
4000
208
5000
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1969 Ford 360
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS5
Torque
Weighting
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
& Power
Test
13-1
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
C02
NOx
kq/hr
kW
1
Idle
0
0.232
32.94
237.36
731.9
0.22
0.337
0.00
2
25%
85
0.077
9.80
21.06
2176.1
7.24
0.741
1. 38
3
55%
190
0.147
33.20
117.45
5795.6
45.71
2.094
5.85
4
25%
85
0.077
9.39
31.31
2099.3
6.55
0.734
1.38
5
10%
34
0.057
4.32
13.76
1179.5
1.68
0.401
0.40
6
25%
85
0.077
9.61
27.40
2178.1
7.14
0.751
1. 38
7
90%
312
0.113
51.03
950.04
5896.4
56.53
2.486
7.38
8
25%
85
0.077
9.72
37.77
2143.5
6.75
0.727
1.38
9
CT
0
0.143
115.66
99.72
242.0
0.02
0.221
0.00
Test 13-2
1
Idle
0
0.232
35.11
152. 48
968.8
0.22
0.421
0.00
2
25%
88
0.077
9.67
22.60
2079.9
6.42
0.727
1.42
3
55%
190
0.147
33. 38
98.59
5970.4
49.13
2.067
5.85
4
25%
85
0.077
9.37
29.79
3899.5
6.50
0.699
1.31
5
10%
34
0.057
4.38
13.86
1169.2
1.85
0.388
0.37
6
25%
90
0.077
9.81
25.28
2226.7
7.93
0.741
1.42
7
90%
315
0.113
55.62
978.87
5854.3
62.88
2.607
7.44
8
25%
85
0.077
10.24
35.63
2129.2
7.25
0.709
1.36
9
CT
0
0.143
123.84
108.40
250.0
0.09
0.227
0.00
Test 13-5
1 Idle
0
0.232
18.40
200.14
678.2
0.00
0.421
0.00
2 25%
83
0.077
10. 30
19.15
1918.0
5.42
0.726
1.33
3 55%
184
0.147
32.49
83.63
5663.5
45.55
2.100
5.68
4 25%
83
0.077
9.28
33.74
1954.4
5.63
0.727
1.33
5 10%
31
0.057
4.30
9.33
1123.8
1.58
0.414
0.37
6 25%
85
0.077
10.32
29.15
2103.8
7.01
0.751
1.38
7 90%
305
0.113
62.43
847.05
5740.1
57.56
2.399
7.23
8 25%
84
0.077
10.53
34.68
2088.2
6.69
0.734
1.36
9 CT
0
0.143
117.89
102.09
171.8
0.00
0.260
0.00
%arometric
Pressure:
Test 13-1 =
737 mm Hg
Test 13-2 =
736 mm Hg Test
13-5 =
735 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE B-7A. TEST 2-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
fOLD TRANSIENT
pwiiJECT no, n-sim-utu
ENGINE NU.IH3II*
engine hwfl bi
ENGINE 5.11 L(3D* CIU) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMFTER 7**.m MM HG(31.33 IN HG)
dry bulb rr»p. aa.a oeg C(70.11 oeg f>
BAG RESULTS
HAG NilHIirK
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P
BLOWER iriLET
BLOWER IfiLET
BLOtfER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECON03
TOTAL FLO* SU>. CU. MET«ES(SCF)
MM. H30(|N, H20)
P MM, H2U(IN. H20)
TtMP, OEfi. C(DEG. F)
TEST NO. e-J RUN
DATE lit/ 1/78
TIME Hi J tru
DVNl) NO. 2
GASOLINE EM-ab7-F
HAG CARI NO. a
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bS PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY IX.0 G«/KG( 77.3 GrAINS/LB)
NoX HUMIDITY C.F. 1,11X11
I
NYNF
703.b (27.7)
*5*.? (17.9)
5*,* (1311.U)
7tbb
372.0
171.3 ( (i333)
a
Lanf
711.a 138.0)
"K.a.3 (is.a)
51.* (130,0)
«08b
30?. 0
302.1 ( 7138)
3
LAF
71*.2 (51,3)
508.0 (eo.uj
5*.* (130,0)
8311
31b,0
aot.7 ( 7211)
*
NYNF
713.7 (38.1)
*51.7 (IB, 1)
5*,* (130.11)
71b3
272.0
171.1 ( b32*)
CD
I
I—'
00
HC
SAMPLE
ME 1 ER/riANGE/PPH
15.1/
3/
*51
22.8/
3/
258
20,1/
3/
201
22.2/
3/
232
HC
«ckg»;o
ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
2.a/
3/
2?
a.*/
3/
21
1.5/
3/
15
1.2/
3/
ia
CO
SAMPLE
MFTf.R/RANG^/PPM
18.1/
3/
Hlb
3b,7/
3/
1082
b2,b/
3/
18*3
*1.5/
3/
1223
CO
Hf.KGHO
dEIFR/KANGE/PPM
.5/
3/
15
» b/
3/
18
.b/
3/
18
.5/
3/
15
coa
SAMPLE
MEIFR/RAMGE/PCT
17.2/
3/
.28
27. 0/
3/
.HI
ba.i/
3/
1.10
15,5/
3/
.25
CO?
bCKtifJU
HKTER/KAWGE/PCT
3.2/
3/
.05
2 .1/
3/
.01
2,1/
3/
.0*
3,0/
3/
.05
MIX
SAMPLE
HEIER/RANGE/PPM
7.7/
2/
8
2B.3/
a/
as
11.1/
a/
12
11,1/
5/
12
NOX
UCKGfcD
HETEH/RANGE/PPH
.*/
2/
0
,5/
2/
l
.?/
a/
I
,«/
2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRAlION PPM
CO? COnCENTRAIION PCI
HOX COnCENTKAIION PPM
ai.it>
*38
13b5
.?3
7.3
23.*3
205
10 33
.10
e?.B
10.37
HO
1750
1,0b
91,3
3*,*1
210
1177
.20
11.1
HC MASS GRAMS
*5.27
a3,m
22.70
21,72
CO MASS GRAMS
28*.17
a*3,i*
*21.01
a*5.38
co? mass g^ams
7*1.7
l*8fe,*
311*.1
bb * . 3
no* MASS GRAiiS
2.51
1U.P7
3b,*8
3,85
FIIFL KG (Lti)
.*23
(
.¦»3)
• bl3
(
1.35)
1.111
I
s.ai)
.353
(
.78)
KW HR (HP HR)
.53
<
.71)
1.21
(
1.73)
*.33
I
5.81)
• b2
(
.83)
HSHC G/KW HR I G/HP HH}
85. b2
(
b3.85)
l«.5b
(
13.8*)
5.a*
t
3.H)
35.00
(
a«».io)
RSCO G/KW HR IG/tIP HR)
S3i.no
(
101.13)
188.88
(
1*0.85)
17.23
I
72.51)
315.35
C
ai*.83)
BSC02 G/K« HR (G/HP HR)
1*17,IB
(1057.31)
115*.bb
(
Bbl,03)
iae.*5
I
b87.87)
1070.*0
(
718,ao)
BSNOX G/h«f HR (G/HP HH)
*,80
(
3.58)
8.15
(
b.30)
8.*2
i
b.2B)
b.21
(
*.b3)
BSFC Kli/KK HR (LB/HP Hk)
. SOU
(
1.315)
»*7h
(
.783).
.3**
i
.Sbb)
,5b8
(
,13*)
total test results * BAGS
PAHTJCULATi DATA, total FOR * HAG8
TOTAL Kw Hk (HP HR)
HSHC G/KM HK (i;/MP HR)
BSCO G/K" lm (G/HP HR)
tjscoe G/K« HK (G/riP HR)
BSNOX «/** hk (G/Mp Hr)
BSFC KG/K«< HK (LB/HP MR)
b.77 ( 1,08)
lb.71 { 12.52)
17b.52 (J 31,b3)
1U11 ( 7h(l)
7.11 ( 5.12)
.125 ( .(,11)
IHMrt FILTER
SAMPLE FLOw
MULTIPLIER FOR
HULTIPLIE" FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
an X ?u FIL IERS
SAMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
3CM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
ii.noon (u.ooou)
it.ttiino (u.unoo)
ii.on I o.o)
-------
TABLE B-7A (CONT'D). TEST 2-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU. 11-5011-001
ENGINE MU.IH31I1
ENGINE HUntL bl
EN6INE S.tl L(3f>1 CIO) ¥-«
CVS Nil. 9
BAROMFTER ?V*,2« 12.1 GRAInS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C,F. I,fl873
I
NYNF
703.b (27,7)
151.7 (17,1)
51.1 C13H.n)
71b1
272,0
178.8 ( b31S)
2
LANF"
711.2 (28,0)
¦Vha.3 [IB.2)
St.* (130.0)
8085
30?,U
2(11.5 £ 7119)
3
LAF
711,2 (21.3)
5118.0 (20.U)
51.1 (130.0)
B318
31b.0
20b,1 ( 7280)
35.21
177
11)12
.21
1.1
23.55
113
1101
.31
28.8
10,17
sun
1151
1,07
13.1
1
NYNF
713.7 (28.1)
151.7 (18.1)
51.1 (130.U)
71b3
ii72.ll
178.b ( b3ll8)
HC
SaHPLF.
meier/rangf/ppm
18.8/
3/
188
20,1/
3/
201
21.1/
3/
211
21,5/
3/
215
HC
BCK6H0
•l£ IFR/RAnGE/PPM
1.1/
3/
11
1.2/
3/
12
1.2/
3/
12
1.2/
3/
12
CO
SAMPLE
nETEtt/KANGE/PPH
37,n/
3/
1011
31.0/
3/
1150
bl.l/
3/
2057
12,5/
3/
1252
CO
BCKGKP
MEIER/RAN&E/PPM
.?/
3/
21
.5/
3/
15
.b/
3/
18
.5/
3/
IS
en?
SAMPLE
ME lER/K'ANGE/PCT
lb.tl/
3/
.2b
2b.b/
3/
.11
b2.3/
3/
1.10
lb.0/
3/
.2b
CO?
bckgko
MEIER/RANGE/PCT
3.0/
3/
.05
3,0/
3/
.05
2.0/
3/
«U3
3,0/
3/
.OS
MOX
SAMPLE
MEfER/RANGE/PPH
10,1/
2/
10
21.1/
2/
21
11.3/
2/
HI
10, b/
2/
11
NOX
BCKGHO
MF.TER/RAHGE/PPM
.2/
2/
0
.3/
2/
0
.*/
2/
0
,b/
2/
1
33.58
203
1205
.21
10,0
HC MASS GRAMS
18. 2B
22.38
23.80
20.15
CO MASS RrtAMS
217.03
258,51
lbl.01
esu.bi
CO? MASS GRAMS
blO. b
1151,0
101b,5
blO , 1
NOX MASS G«A«S
3.bB
12.08
10,27
3.72
FUEL KG (LB)
.313
(
.7b)
. b08
(
1.31)
1.532
I
3,38)
. 3b3
(
,80)
KM HR (HI' HR)
.bl
(
.82)
1.31
(
1.87)
1.3b
I
5.81)
• b3
(
.85)
BSHC G/KK HH IG/HP HR)
31.10
(
22.10)
(b ,0b
c
11.18)
5,1b
i
1.07)
33,02
(
21,b2)
HSCO G/KK H-t IG/HP HK)
351.11
(
2b1.b8)
185,58
(
138.3D
107,b3
(.
8(1.2b)
315,0b
(
211.51)
BSC02 G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
1121.10
(
812.11)
11111. b2
(
77b.71)
128,11
1
b12.31)
1087,b?
(
811,08)
BSNOX G/KX tfH (G/HP HR)
h.ne
(
1.11)
«.b?
(
b. 17)
1,21
I
b,81)
5,87.
(
*.37)
BSFC KU/K* HH (LB/HP HK)
»5b2
(
.121)
• 13b
(
.717)
.351
I
.578)
.572
(
.110)
TOTAL TEST RFSULTS 1 BaBS
PARTICULATE I)aTA» TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
TOTAL K* HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KK HH (K/HP HH)
BSCli
-------
TABLE B-7B, TEST 2-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU, U-SOtH-Olll
ENGINE NO.IH30*
tNGINF MODEL b9
ENGINE S.'l L(30* CII)} V-8
CVS NO. 9
BARfllffEP 7*2.7" «M HG{29.?* IN HG)
DHV BULB JEHP. 23.9 f>FG C(?5.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NIJMUEK
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF p MM. HaotltJ. HBO)
BLOWER INLET P KM. H20(IH, H20)
BLOwER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLfMEW RKVOL'il IOf)
521.51
<
388.89)
18*1.38
(
1*1.22)
98.*9
(
73.**)
237.90
(
17 7,*0)
BSCOe G/KH< HR (G/HP HR)
130b.79
(
97*.*7)
1107,95
(
82b.20)
91b,17
I
b83,19)
10**.bb
(
779,00)
BSHOX U/K* HR (G/HP HR)
*.35
(
3.2*)
\Bl
(
5,82)
8.71
I
b.SO)
5,*0
I
*,02)
BSFC KG/Kw HR (LB/HP HR)
.755
(
1.2*1)
. *b2
(
.759)
.3*2
I
.Sb3)
• *bl
(
.758)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS i bAGS
TOTAL Kft MR (HP HR)
(JSMC G/K« HK (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/Krf HR (K/Hp H«)
BSC02 G/K« MR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/K1 HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW Mrt (l.B/riP HR)
particulate data, tutal for * bags
b.*7 ( 9.3S)
1* , 7* ( X 0 »«*«» >
lb3.75 (122.11)
198 ( 7**)
7.8b ( 5.8b)
.*10 ( .b 75)
90MM FILTER
Sample fv>*
MULTIPLIED FOR
multiplied for
MULTIPLIER FOR
Pll X 2U FILTERS
SXwPLE FLO"
SCrt(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtt)
StKtSCF)
n.000 ( 0,00)
11.000
0.0000 (b.ouoo)
U.0000 (U.0000)
W.00 • I
n.nj
-------
TABLE B-7B (CONT'D). TEST 2-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.IH3U*
ENGINE mWEL bl
ENG1HF 5.H L(3n* CII)) V-H
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*2.7U MM HG(21.?* IN HG)
Dry BULB TCttp. 2*.* Dt'G C(7b.O UEB F)
BAG RFSULTS
BAG NUMtlER
description
flUWER OIF P MM. HiMHlN. H?0)
8L0WEP I«UET P MM. H?()(IN. H20)
BLOwEp IflUFT TEMP. PEG. C(DEG. F)
BtOHER REVOLW1IONS
TIME seconds
TOTAL FLOW STl». CU. mEt"FS(SCF)
HC SAMPLf Ht»FP/KA«H,E/PPH
HC BCKGiil) ME f ER/RANGE/PPM
cn SAHPLE MEffc*K/KANGE/PPM
CO BCKGH|> MF IER/RaNGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE nETER/KAMGE/PCT
COa BCKGHO WETER/KaNCE/PCT
f NOX SAMPLE rtEJER/RANGE/PPM
to NOX BCKGHO meTEH/RANGE/PPM
UILUTIWW FACTUM
HC CONCENTS*I ION PPM
CO CUNCfMRAtlOM PPrt
CO? CO*ClfilRA» ION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC> MASS GRAMS
CO MASS SKAHS
CO? MAS3 GRAMS
NOX *AS5 GRAMS
FUEL KG (L«)
KW HR (HP H«)
dSHC 6/KW HB (G/HP HH)
8SC0 G/Kt* HB (G/HP MS)
escua e/K*. hk (g/hp hr)
BSUOX tt/KW HH (G/HP HR)
HSFC KG/hV HH fLH/HP HH)
TOTAL TEST .RDSULI# 1 BAGS
TOTAL ** HH (HP Hl<) 7.H? ( 1.11)
BSHC (5/K« HH CU/HP HR) 111.S3 ( 7.85)
8SC0 G/Kt" HH /
3/
18
1 b .0/
3/
.2b
2b.3/
3/
.*3
bl. 7/
3/
1.01
lb , 1/
3/
,2b
3.0/
3/
.05
3.0/
3/
.05
3.2/
3/
.05
3.2/
3/
.05
lll.b/
2/
11
28.*/
2/
28
85.1/
2/
8b
10.2/
2/
10
.3/
2/
0
.3/
2/
0
.5/
2/
1
.7/
2/
1
3R.51
125
770
.21
10.3
es.os
131
8b3
« 31
28.1
10 .2b
112
lSbO
1.0*
85.f
33.1b
222
1218
.21
H.5
12.10
15. 2b
22.80
22.88
lhll.17
202.11
*b1.1b
253.18
bRI. 7
1*30.I
313*.1
bR5.2
*.f|*
12.*2
38.58
3.73
.310
(
.h")
• 5bb
(
1.25)
l.*1b
I
3.30)
.3b*
(
.no)
• b3
(
.85)
1.31
(
1.87)
*.38
I
5.87)
.bl
(
.82)
211.3*
(
15.17)
10.15
(
8.17)
S.21
I
3.88)
37.*2
(
27.11)
252.*b
(
lBH.2fe)
1*5.3b
(
108.*o)
107.38
I
80.II7)
* 1*.Ob
(
308,77)
1087.10
(
Rltl.bS)
102b.b5
C
7hS,57)
811.0b
t
b70.*3)
1120.55
(
835.51)
b.3h
(
*.75)
8.11
(
b.b5)
8.82
I
b.57)
b.01
(
*.5*)
.»««
(
.802)
.*07
(
, bb8)
.3*2
(
.Sb2)
.Sib
(
.171)
particulate oau» tutal for * hags
inwM filter
sample flow
multiplied FDR
multiplier for
multiplier for
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/Kw HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/LH FUtL)
o.noo I n,«n)
n.ouu
ii.Diinn (o.uiino)
u.oorto (u.uuuu)
?ll * 2ii FILTERS
SAMPLt FLO"
SCMCSCF)
n.on ( o.u)
-------
TABLE B-8A. TEST 3-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, U-5011-001
ENGINE NO.IH31S
ENGINE MODEL bl IH-315
ENGINE 5.7 L(315 CIO} V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7«5.21 MM HG(21.31 IN HG)
ORY BULB TEMP. 27.8 OEG C(82.0 OEG F)
TEST NO.3-1 RUN
OATE 10/30/78
TIKE nis2o
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE fc«-2b7-F
BAG CAR! NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIOITY 21 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.1 GM/KGC «~ 8.* GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .88<1(1
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM, H20(IN. H20)
8L0«ER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20>
blower inlet temp. oeg. ccdeg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME seconds
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
703,b (27,7)
152.1 (17.8)
51.1 (1311.ri)
?Ib?
272,(1
171,1 ( b338)
2
lanf
713.7 (28.1)
1b1,8 (18,3)
S1.1 (130,0)
B088
307.0
202,1 ( 71*0)
3
LAF
75b.1 (21.8)
515,b (20,3)
5*.* (130,0)
8320
31b,0
20b.5 ( 7211)
1
NYNF
713.7 (28,1)
1b2, 3 (18.2)
51.1 (130.11)
71b*
272.0
171,1 ( b32b)
CO
I
W
to
HC
SAMPLE
meter/range/pph
*3,1/
3/
131
20, b/
3/
20b
17,3/
3/
173
12.5/
3/
125
HC
BCKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPM
.8/
3/
R
1.*/
3/
11
1.1/
3/
11
1.2/
3/
12
CO
SAMPLE
meier/range/ppm
27,b/
3/
817
25,1/
3/
711
1S,b/
3/
1313
18,0/
3/
53b
CO
BCKGRD
meter/range/ppm
1.1/
3/
31
1,0/
3/
31
1.3/
3/
10
1.3/
3/
in
C02
SAMPLE
meter/range/pct
17,b/
3/
.28
27, b/
3/
.*5
b3,5/
3/
1.12
11.7/
3/
.23
CO?
8CKGR0
METER/WANGE/PCT
3,0/
3/
.05
s.v
3/
.01
2.1/
3/
.01
2,1/
3/
.HI
NOX
SAMPLE
meier/range/ppm
1,1/
2/
1
3b,8/
2/
37
50,3/
3/
151
13.7/
2/
11
NOX
BCKGRO
meter/hange/ppm
.3/
2/
0
.3/
2/
0
.1/
3/
0
.*/
2/
0
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
33.01
123
772
.2*
1.1
21,11
113
701
.*1
3b.5
10,55
lb3
I2bb
l.OB
150,b
•>*,78
113
110
.11
13.3
HC MASS GRAMS
13.80
22.15
11.12
11.70
CO MASS GRAMS
lb 1.35
lbS.ob
30*.,37
102.28
CO? MASS GRAMS
781. h
1525,5
1015,1
b21.8
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.78
12.55
52,10
1.05
FUEL KG (LB)
,370
C
.8?)
.S8S
(
1.21)
l.*bl
(
3.22)
.251
(
.57)
KW HR (HP HR)
(
.51)
1.2B
(
1.72)
1,15
I
5.17)
.5b
(
.75)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
11.02
(
73.81)
17.51
(
13.0b)
1,3b
(
3.25)
20.10
(
15.51)
6SC0 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
3bl.7S
(
272.OU)
12H.7S
(
lb.01)
b8,31
I
51.00)
182.71
(
13b.27)
BSC02 G/Kk HR (G/HP HR)
17bb,13
(1317.bO)
1181.15
(
887.31)
120,27
I
b8b.25)
lllb.21
(
832.38)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
b.?R
(
l.bl)
*<.71
(
7.30)
11.81
C
8.8b)
7.21
(
S.10)
BSFC KG/Kw HR (LB/HP HR)
.837
(
1.37b)
.15b
(
.750)
.328
(
.510)
.1b3
(
• 7b2)
T8TAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (MP HR) b.73 ( 1,03)
BSMC G/KW HR {G/HP HR) 11.1b ( 10,78)
BSCO G/KW HH (G/HP HR) KI8.B5 ( 81,17)
BSC02 G/KW HH (U/HP HR) loll ( 778)
HSNOX G/K« HH £G/HP HR) 10.73 ( 8,00)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .317 ( .1,53)
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
multiplies FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SfcHV»l_fc FW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/tfP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/Lfl FUtL)
SC«t95f)
II.000 I 0.00)
o.ono
n.onon (u.oooo)
0,1(11)0 (o.00(10)
n.ou (
U.fO
-------
TABLE B-8A (CONT'D). TEST 3-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, ll-50**-0fll
ENGINF N0.IH3*5
ENGINE MODEL hi IH 3*5
engine s.? lu*s cio) v-8
CVS NO. 1
barometer 7*5.2* mm hg(2i,3* in HG)
DRY BULB T£Mp. 23.1 DEG C(75,0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET f MH, HZO(lN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, OEG. C(DEG. F)
HLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. METRESCSCF)
TEST NO.3-1 RUN
DATE 10/30/7H
time 01:20
OVNO NO, 8
GASOLINE tN-2b?-F
BAG CAR 1 NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3b PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.8 G*/KG( *7,* GRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. ,8851
1
NYNF
703.b (27.7)
*52,I (17.8)
5*.* (1311,0)
7 I b*
272,1)
171,1 ( b335)
2
lanf
713,7 (28,1)
*b*.B (18,3)
5*,* (130,0)
808*
307.0
202,0 ( 713b)
3
LAF
75b,1 (21,B)
515.b (20,3)
SH.* (130,0)
831b
31b, 0
20b,* ( 7210)
*
NYNF
713,7 '(28,1)
*b2.3 (18,2)
5*,H (130,(1).
71b2
272,0
171,0 ( b32*)
HC
HC
CO
CO
U
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
u>
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
meter/range/ppm
meter/range/ppm
MEJER/RANGE/PCT
meter/range/pct
METER/KANGE/PPM
meter/range/ppm
IS,*/ 3/
1.b/ 3/
11,3/ 3/
,b/ 3/
13,2/ 3/
2.*/ 3/
10.0/ 2/
.1/ 2/
15*
lb
57*
18
.21
.0*
10
n
I*.*/ 3/
1.2/ 3/
21.0/ 3/
.b/ 3/
£5.0/ 3/
2,3/ 3/
31.1/ 2/
.*/ 2/
1**
12
857
18
.•»!
,0*
31
0
17.2/ 3/
.1/ 3/
172
1
55.3/ 3/ lb28
1.1/ 3/
b2.5/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
*b,7/ 3/
,3/ 3/
3*
1.10
.U*
1*0
1
1*,7/ 3/
1,1/ 3/
2»,1/ 3/
1,*/ 3/
!*,!/ 3/
3,1/ 3/
12,2/ 2/
,8/ 2/
1*7
11
738
*3
• 22
• 05
12
1
0ILU1ION FACTOR
*7,b1
2b.*0
10, *8
*3,05
HC ConCEnTRAVION PPM
138
132
lb*
13b
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
5*8
823
15*5
b85
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
,17
.38
1,07
,18
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
**.b
30.7
131,3
11,*
HC MASS GRAMS
1* .31
15.**
11.51
1* , 07
CO MASS GRAMS
11*.38
113.70
371.31
1*2.80
COP MASS GRAMS
5b8. R
13«B,1
*0*0.b
5B2.2
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.12
10.51
*8,b8
3,*b
FUEL KG (LB)
,250
(
.55)
.5*1
c
1.21)
1 ,*77
(
3,2b)
,2b8
(
.51)
KW HR (HP HR)
.*1
(
.5*)
1*21
(
1.73)
* .HO
(
5.111)
.55
(
.73)
BSHC G/KW MR (G/MP HR*
35.23
(
2b.27)
U.lb
(
8,12)
*,*3
(
3,31)
25,7b
(
H,21)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
281.5*
(
201.15)
150.0*
(
111.81)
8*.37
(
b2.1I)
2bl,**
(
11*.lb)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1*00.01
(10**.«*)
1075.8b
(
802.27)
118.08
I
b8*,b2)
10bS,1*
(
71*.87)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
7,18
(
5.3b)
8.1*
(
b.07)
11.0b
I
8,25)
b.3*
(
*.73)
BSFC KG/KK HR CLB/HP HR)
.bib
(
1,01J)
.*25
(
,b11)
,33b
(
.552)
,*11
(
.808)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP H«) b.b* ( 8,11)
0SHC G/KW HH (G/HP HR) 1.53 C 7.11)
6SC0 G/K* HR (G/HP HR) 123,7* ( 12.27)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 110 ( 731)
ftSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR) T.8 7 ( 7,3b)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .383 ( .(,30)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIES FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL)
SCM(SCF)
0,000 ( 0,00)
0.000
u.oooo (o.onoo)
0,0000 (0,0000)
it.aii ( o,n)
-------
TABLE B-8B, TEST 3-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINF N0.IH3*5
ENGINE MODEL bS
ENGINE 5.7 1.(3*5 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*8.28 MM HG(21.*b IN HG)
ORV BULB TCP. 23.3 DEG C(7*,0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOKER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET IEmP. DEG. C(DEG» F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PCT
COS 6CKGR0 rfETER/RANGE/PCT
W NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
fjj NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
•C*
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COS CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COS MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
K* HR CUP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
8SNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL K* HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/Kf HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KH HR (LB/HP HR)
h.*5 ( 8.b5)
11.87 ( 11.01)
100.38 ( 7*.8b)
101b ( 818)
11.22 ( 8.3b)
.*10 ( ,b7H)
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NU. ll-50**-001
TEST NO.3-2 RUN
DATE 11/ 1/78
TIME 081*0 GASOLINE tH-2b?-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY *0 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.3 GM/KG( 51.0 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. ,BIBb
1
NYNF
703.b (27.7)
*52.'I (17.8)
5*.* (1311.0)
71 b7
272.1)
180.2 ( b3h5)
*3.0/ 3/ *30
.8/ 3/ 8
20.7/ 3/ bl5
.2/ 3/ b
I*.9/ 3/ .2*
2,1/ 3/ .0*
b.7/ 2/ 7
.5/ 2/ 1
3*.3*
*22
S11
.11
b.2
2
LANF
713.7 (28.1)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8087
307.0
203.0 ( 7170)
20,1/ 3/ 201
1.7/ 3/ 17
22,b/ 3/ b?l
.b/ 3/ 18
28.0/ 3/ .*b
3.0/ 3/ ,05
3b,b/ 2/ 37
,5/ 2/ 1
2*.**
113
<>39
• *2
3<».1
3
LAF
75b.S (21,8)
515.b (20.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8311
31b. o
207.* ( 7325)
15.S/ 3/ 159
1,0/ 3/ 10
*1.*/ 3/ 1220
1.1/ 3/ 3*
bS.U/ 3/ 1.15
2,5/ 3/ .U*
51,0/ 3/ 153
,3/ 3/ 1
10,*2
ISO
11*7
1.12
152,2
*
NY NF
713.7 (28,1)
*b2,3 (18,2)
S*.* (130.0)
71b3
272.0
171.1 ( b353)
12,0/ 3/ 12U
.1/3/ 1
lb.7/ 3/ *18
1.*/ 3/ *3
1*,b/ 3/ .23
2.7/ 3/ .U*
12.3/ 2/ 12
.8/2/ 1
*5, 71
111
**8
.11
11,5
*3.81
22.Sb
17,1*
11.5*
125,b3
151.00
27b,IS
13.81
b*0.1
1552.b
*2*7,7
b31,1
».12
12.bO
5*,2b
3.5b
.308
(
.b8)
.587
(
1.2D
1,*1*
I
3.21)
.257
(
.57)
.21
(
.28)
1.27
(
1.71)
*.*3
I
5.1*)
.5*
(
.73)
211.. 3b
(
157.bl)
1'. 72
(.
13,22)
*,05
I
3.02)
21.30
C
15.88)
<>05. 0*
(
*51.17)
118.b3
(
88,*b)
b2.55
(
*b.b*)
173,3*
(
121.2b)
3082,8b
(2218.81)
1211.70
(
101,53)
SSI,2*
C
715,31)
llbb.51
(
8bS,8b)
1.27
(
b-.11)
1.10
(
7,38)
12.25
C
1,1*)
b , 57
C
*.10)
1 .*83
(
2.*38)
.*bl
(
,758)
.337
I
.555)
.*75
(
.781)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
10MM FILTER
SAHPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 < 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/L8 FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0,000 ( 0.00)
0.000
(l.OOUU (U.IIOOO)
o.uooo (o.ounoi
o.oo ( o.n)
-------
TABLE B-8B (CONT'D). TEST 3-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.IH345
ENGINE MODEL bl
ENGINE 5.7 L(345 CIO) V-8
CVS NO, 1
BAROMETER 748.28 MM HG(21.4b IN HG)
DRY HUL8 1EHP. 25.b OEG C(78.0 [)EG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20CIN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. rt20(IN. H20)
BLOWER IHLET IEMP. OEG. C(0EG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS ¦
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGKD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGHD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE ME TER/RANGE/PCT
COa BCKGKD ME1ER/RANGE/PCT
W NOX SAMPLE MEJER/RANGE/PPM
k NOX flCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
U1
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRAIION PPM
CO CONCEN'IRAl ION PPM
cm concentration pct
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
MC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAmS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KK HR (MP MR)
BSHC G/KU HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KK HR (Lb/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS H BAGS
TOTAL KH HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/M HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP H«)
BSC02. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/K« HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW (LH/HP HR) .385 (
b.84 (
7 . bO (
133.33 (
188 (
HI.51 (
HOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO.3-2 RUN
DATE 11/ 1/78
TIME
DYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.2 G/ 3/ lib
4.B/ 3/ 48
33.0/ 3/ 174
.4/ 3/ 12
8*.8/ 3/ ,*1
2,8/ 3/ .04
28,b/ 2/ 21
1,2/ 2/ 1
2b. rll
lou
137
» 3b
27. t
3
LAF
75b.1 (2^.8)
SIS.b (20.3)
5*.4 (130,0)
851b
323,b
10.35
153
1770
1,0b
118.5
4
NYNF
713.7 (28.1)
4b2.3 (18.2)
54.* (130.11)
7241
275,0
212,3
(
74lq)
181.8
C
b42 2 )
11,1/
3/
Hi
10.1/
3/
11)1
4.2/
3/
42
•*.3/
3/
43
b3, 5/
3/
1870
21.1/
37
b50
.1/
3/
28
1.1/
3/
34
b2. 1/
3/
1*10
14,4/
3/
.23
2.1/
3/
,04
2.1/
3/
.04
31.b/
3/
111
11,8/
2/
12
,1'
3/
0
,b/
2/
1
44.30
51
b03
,11
11.2
1.18)
5,b7)
11.42)
737)
7,b7)
.f.33)
,15,30
11. 80
18.74
b.18
123,54
223.47
437.71
12?.bb
b71 .0
13b?.8
4103.1
bl ?. 7
4.33
11.32
S0.b7
4.11
.288
(
• b4 )
.554
(
1.22)
1.521
I
3.37)
. 2b4
(
.58)
.54
(
.72)
1.28
(
1.72)
4.47
K
b.OO)
.55
(
.74)
28.48
(
21.24)
1.21
(
b.8b)
4,11
(
3.12)
11.23
(
8.37)
2 21'. 11
C
171.50)
174.32
(
121.11)
17,85
(
72.17)
231.81
(
172,8b)
1241.23
(
131.S5)
10b7.00
(
715,bb)
117,43
I
bR4.13)
1121.72
(
83b.4b)
8.0b
(
b.Ol )
8.83
(
b , 51)
11.33
I
8.45)
7.4b
(
5.5b)
.53b
(
.882)
,432
(
.710)
,342
i.
• 5b2 )
.480
(
.781)
PARTICULATE DATA
, TOTAL
FOR 4 BAGS
qnMM FILTER,
SAMPLE FLOW
multiplier FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KK HH (G/HP HR)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
20 X ?u FILTERS
SAMPLE FLU"
SCM(SCF)
0.000 I 0,00)
0.000
u.oono (0.0000)
n.iiijuo (o.nooo)
ii.nn ( o.o)
-------
TABLE B-9A. TEST 4-1 ET1ISSI0NS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11—5044—001
•ir.inio'i
TFST NU. 4-1
RUN
ft.'CIKi l-.n 1st 104
DATE 11/17/77
i
EM'.lM *-.0 LUC*. Lit:) V-tt
TIME 09:15
GASOLINE
EN-
267—F
cvs ,vn. -»
UYNO NO. 2
BAG CART NO. 1
PA°CNFTM 74 5.4«> f-S HG(29.35 IN HC)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
26. PCT
rnv ill.L' /'j.o 0«G C (77.0 DIG F)
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
5.3 GM/KOI 36
.8 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.8478
PAC MUITS
PAG NUKf®
1
2
3
¦ 4
D'SCnIPT1wN
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
PLO*FI- 1:1t P *rH/UUh. H20)
«tr".iri,""i%l«rT p M'. H2oil'.."h;ij)
703.6 127.7)
713.7 (28.1)
756.9 (29
.B)
113.1 (28.
1)
452.1 (17*8)
464.8 (18.3)
515.6 (20
.3)
462.3 (18.
2)
H.rvr-k> i\tf i i.?v. uu.. uott. n
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.01
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130
.0)
f-LOV- t 1-. Vi'lUT ll'tiS
7160.
8090.
8322.
7166.
t i ir. cr-':.'ns
212.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
niv sin. cu. .tf i1 si sen
179.5 < 6341.)
202.3 ( 7144.
)
206.6 ( 7299.
)
179.2 ( 6330.)
.
MC SAfl'Lt PI II './«f Sl'Ji /PPf.
39.0/ 3/ 390.
18.4/ 3/ 184.
19.3/ 3/
193.
14.5/ 3/ 145.
HC RCKf.vn ?-~ U! /I.1W./PPM
1.2/ 3/ 12.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
1.2/ 3/
12.
1.8/ 3/
18.
ro sa."pi i 't n r./u'f,t./?pr
35.9/ 3/ 849.
37.6/ 3/ 898.
72.3/ 3/1897.
34.9/ 3/ 824.
co i*c»g->c *tTi<¦¦ /f.ANr,t./pprt
" tcfii**'Ir- 7*I Ti. r~/*' ANl>f /PC 1 "
.1/ 3/ 2.
.1/3/ 2.
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/ 3/
2.
13.2/ 3/ .21
24.3/ 3/ .40
57.0/ 3/
1.00
13.7/ 3/
.22
CP? RCKirW '1 U't/^./i.VjUrtl
3.2/ 3/ .05
3.4/ 3/ .05
4.1/ 3/
.06
3.5/ 3/
.05
W Kf'X SA^PLt :*l Ti K/i;/lM /PPr
5.9/ 2/ 6.
28.2/ 2/ 20.
35.7/ 3/
107.
10.4/ 2/
10.
K, M2X ncKli'iH ftKk/Rihbl/PPK
4 ,
1.4/ 2/ 1.
1.0/ 2/ 1.
.ki S/
1.
1.1/ 2/
1.
O*
DILUTin:: mctdp
40.48
26.64
11.10
42.42
Hf COM'.f M i ATiOf. P P >'¦
378.
171.
182.
127.
cr cnNtf nt^aticiv pp.m
i
836.
A ai.
<
1 Hi.
611.
cn? Cr;f.cr mvai 1u;- pci
. 16
.35
.95
.16
mi* cnt ci M"«ii(;i, ppm
4.5
27.2
106.0
9.3
Mr »a*s ctAns >
39.17
20.01
21.16
13.17
CO "*5 '» A* S
174.80
20 7.49
443.27
169.25
rvf jv.ss >
527.4
1279.1
3561.1
538.3
NO *<.\ss O-.'^S
1.32
8.93
35.52
2*71
FU'l K(- U<>)
.292 1 .64)
.526 (
1.16)
1.370
1
3.62)
.267
( .59)
KVi Hn IMP hf >
.26 I .3*)
1.26 (
1.69)
4.36
(
5.84)
.52
( .70)
PSHC l./K- ^ 1
139.96 I 104.37)
15.89 (
11.85)
4.98
(
3.72)
25.15
( 18.76)
BSCn C/h l<,. JG/HP ftk)
624.59 I 465.76)
164.76 ( 122.86)
101.76
(
74.661
323.23
( 241.03)
usee? «V/k;i ir d,/HP hfi)
16b4.b2 (1405.36)
1015163 ( 757.35)
822.12
( 613.06)
1028.11
( 766.66)
PSKP* C/KW H< 10/HP H,V )
4.72 « 3.52)
7.09 1
5.29)
6. 16
t
6.08)
S.la
1 3.86)
PVf il./**.' !• ¦: lUf./t'P »«-:»
1.043 ( 1.715)
.418 (
.687)
.315
(
.517)
.509
( .837)
•"WW T' 11 -i ..Mfs A
ti;tm. vs. f jt"p :-n 'ir.i?"r
PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR
4 BAGS
i j
9'bMff mtts"
PSi'C if.Vi'P i"vi l (
lo.'rjj
SAMPLE FLOW SCP1SCF)
0.
000 ( 0.00)
RSCC (i,/mP M- I { (llS.^h
" " M-JLTiPLltfi FOfe C7TETT
0.000
rsci / t;/^> r- ( »f I ' (
JJ
mul11pl(tft for fi/Kd fufcL ttyib fUCL)
0.0000 10.00601
T'Sf'l V{„'i 7 /c It . /MP ^) ~ , 1/v (
-------
TABLE B-9A (CONT'D). TEST 4-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. ll-50**-001
FN'". HiF SC. |
TncIn!" 'ypFt-T
'FNSlNf <."() t. ( (•)<.
ev's'Ni;."""
TEST NO.
llHi C l H2 • i) I) K G F I
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 2*. PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 5.7 GM/KG( 39.9 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .858*
RAG »'l SUl I S
P AC MtfMFS
IfSfCIPT toT"
NY NF
LANF.
LAF
NYNF
"LIHT. RIF f V-. H2'JII\.
'Hhv#.'P~'i:u r T if
703.6 127.7)
713.7 (28.11
756.9 (29.8)
713.7 (28.11
H.MMIN. H<"1)
<¦52.1 (17.8)
*6*.8 (18.3)
515.6 (20.3)
*62.3 (18.2)
RLCif-- IMtl n.-?.
ill vriuriiif:S
lihG. LcG. H
55.0 (131.0)
55.0 (131.0)
55.0 (131.0)
55.0 (131.0)
716 H . v
8090.
8322.
7*9* .
1 Iff% si cr-JOi
InrAi"i'iji:- sti, . tu.
272.0
307.0
316.0
28*.*
i'.LT*FSI )
179.2 ( 6331.)
202.0 ( 7133.)
206.3 ( 7287.)
187.1 ( 6609.)
Ft
Ff"
til"
S-'.,lP\l Tf 1/^A'JGl-/i'pr
T e>"r
15.7/ 3/ 157.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
16.*/ 3/ 16*.
i.i/ 3/ rrr
20.6/ 3/ 206.
16.5/ 3/ 165.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
>1
^ I t AKOI. /PP»
1.2/ 3/ 12.
30.3/ 3/ 709.
*0.6/ 3/ 970.
79.8/ 3/2153.
35.*/ 3/ 836.
IT rm <*/rangi/ppk
f.n7' S AP LT" V ' T ' -/'.A lor /?CT
Cfl? I'f.K iVw0 .-m~.yK*MGl/PCT
OT Kfv sAvPii i Ti "/»'ar7Ct / p P m
to
"vj
.1/ 3/
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/ 3/
.1/ 3/
2.
13.7/ 3/ .22
22.9/ 3/
.37
56.0/ 3/
.98
13.*/ 3/
.21
3.5/ 3/ .05
3.1/ 3/
.05
3.6/ 3/.06
3.6/ 3/ .06
fi0X pcxr.t'i; .",1 i; •/rANGt/PPM
10.3/ 2/
1.1/ 2/
10.
26.*/
1.1/ 2/
2/ 26.
35.5/ 3/ 107.
10.9/ 2/ 11.
1.
.5/ 3/
li6/ 2/
firuf p'N j Atrrrr
k: *T:sj>.ti ni -¦ ATTiir pp.i
Cr5 fn-irr T k a T 11,N PP*
27.73
**.35
11.0*
*3.1*
l**.
153.
19*.
153.
698.
953.
COS CI' M.1 If:,-. I I (
209*.
PCI
82*.
.16
.33
r:cv cove; Hjn pp:•
9.2
25.3
.93
105.1
.16
9.3
"hi:
en
"ccr
17.87
r..1 ss
1*. 92
23.11
16.5*
1 is !.* a; ¦>
1*5.68
22*.21
502.99
179.58
'.SS 0 ^ " S
538.3
1203.8
3527.9
5*0.0
s -> j
2. 72
o
•
QD
35.62
2.87
FUH KC II ?l
.257 (
.57)
.508 1
1.12)
1.38* (
3.05)
.276 ( ]
.61)
^ )
151 (
.00)
1.26 (
1.69)
*.35 (
5.8*1
.51 (
.69)
PSHC C/K>. h<> tt/Hh >!>.)
29.25 ( 21.81)
1*.19 ( 10.58)
5.31 (
I'Std i;/ K 'J'-f ( G/I'P HV I
"SSCiV""G/l'>. f's"(G/HP M-:)
' n'Sf C" KT./i ;
3.96)
32.15 ( 23.97)
265.60 ( 212.97)
178.03 ( 132.76)
115.59 ( 86.20)
3*8.98 ( 260.23)
1055.30 I 786.9*)
955.87 I 712.79)
Mk IC/HP IIM
ii ~tt >;/Hp-i«r
810.75 ( 60*.57)
10*9.*1 ( 782.55)
5.32 (
3.97)
6.67 (
*.98)
8.19 (
6.10)
5.58 (
*.16)
.503 (
.828)
.*0* I
.66*)
.318 ( .523)
.536 (
.881)
TPTM Tf ST' ' t.WH IS '•
T fi T f [
r-SHf
t i,/'U'
i o. SI /
v s r r
11./i*
I Sf c
PARTICULATE UATA, TOTAL
FOR * BAGS
y. "*0)
90Mfl FILTER
. i <>)
SAMPLE FLOW
SCfMSCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
¦'».
-------
TABLE B-9B. TEST 4-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
fSCINV" *«*. PO(H
TEST NU.
4-3 RUN
FNGINf fVIOH. hi IH 304
DATE 11/21/77
ENGIM *¦-.(J CIO) V-ll
TIME 0«:40
GASOLINE Efl-
26 7-F
CVS NO. ¦* .
OYNO NG
. 2
BAG CART NO. 1
fASITTf' 7it-.CI HG(2V.4«> IS KG)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
38. PCT
CtY RUL*4 If "P. tj..\ or;0 (.173.0 Dtc F I
ABSULUTt
HUHIOITY
6.7 Cn/KC( 46.7 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.8826
PAG #'¦ SUITS
n/c
1
2
i
4
rrsc^iPi Pi*
NYNf
LANF
LAF
NYNF
M rwi fM» p . ns<;< i''. h->:i )
70*3.6 127.
7)
*13.* <26.1)
756.9 129.A)
713.7 tit.
1)
tiUV'l JMir .• . iVllllh. H / ij )
4S2.1 117.
8)
462.3 (18.2)
515.6 (20.3)
462.3 (18.
2)
PLOW? I'iLI i T;-f.i>. UEG. C(|)I G. F)
1130
.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130
.01
1 ri.s
7170.
6091.
8323.
>166.
TIM St a>M!S
271.9
307.0
316.0
272.0
TClftL H.t'v STi;. i.U. r'.l 1 M S( SCF 1
100.2 I 6366.1
203.1 ( 7173.)
207.4 ( 7326.
)
179.9 ( 6353.)
IT SAM»Lf 1" T! V / - A!»< ¦ i / P P
43.3/ 3/ 433.
22.6/ 3/ 226.
21.3/ 3/ 213.
20.1/ 3/ 201.
»; sc.M't.i r-i Ti i-/~ /pp^
5.4/ 2/
5.
29.5/ 2/ 30.
36.4/ 3/ 109.
11.3/ 2/
11.
K» K(1X RCO-U ft ~/KANSi'/PPM
.9/ 2/
1.
1.0/ 2/ 1.
.4/ 3/ 1.
1.3/ 2/
1.
w
PTLUHr.N MCtl)1
42.34
26.04
11.12
42.36
Mr CPMC.' NT - All IN PP'i
414.
208.
196.
184.
Cf! CI!M> Klk/. T!';N PP.*
811.
*
964 •
1936.
845.
cr? r. «-ASS t.fc A"S
1.3H
9.79
37.86
3.05
Ft>» L KG li t'J
.277
( .611
.*4* ( 1.20)
1.384 (
3.05)
.274
( .60)
"X Hi! I^P !•-. )
.22
t .29)
1.25 ( 1.68)
4.38 (
5.87)
.51
( .68)
{'SIC I-/K. tiV M./H? J
198.85
( 14».2«>
19.46 ( 14.511
5.35 1
3.99)
37.51
( 27.97)
PSCi; C/K» K,-< tC/Hf Hf. )
785.31
( 585.60)
182.33 ( 135.96)
106.80 (
79.64)
347.1*
( 258.67)
psr.cv ("/'• hi u,/hp ;<(•)
2IV*.34
(1636.32)
1027.26 ( 766.03)
817.61 < 609.69)
1037.35
( 773.55)
PSKry i,/<< r:-' to/h-p Hk)
6.35
1 4.74)
7.83 ( 5.84)
ft.65 (
6.45)
5.97
( 4.45)
esrr k' /k n-» clv/mp »!>•)
1.2ti<>
t 2.104)
.434 ( .713)
.316 (
.519)
.536
( .882)
_fi_si • >\u:rv","~(;¦ \./k\ i','.-;c BOTTWLIE1TFTO G/IEST 0.000
""" " 1SCIV "M./Wi iji'H.i ~ ffi/Limifc* FOR ft/KW HR IC/HP HR1 0.0000 10.0000)
"V* "'f-../ ../i "(:,/! >- i¦-:} ".l-r I i.A'li " HiJLTIKIER~FOR—G7KG" FUHT1G71B FUEL)—0.0000 (0.0000)
r5rc "" r f. tit. i ~.j'ht i j r
- — tWlTTO "FTC ft'STS
~ "J...?:--.:-.'r. ; *cwr B.BB t 0.01
-------
TABLE B-9B (CONT'D). TEST 4-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
TkCIM Mfli'-'t!'- " "" " TfcST Nil. 4-3 RUN
T«6lW"'Win L 1H J0 L ( Ml!. <»
DYNO NO. 2
BAG CART NO. 1
"Atr^rTlV 7 K.( /'). 1M tt(.j 1
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
34. PCT
C'-"Y PUl If in; HT-i.u IMG f-)
ABSOLUTE
hUfl ID I TY
7.0 GM/KG( 49.0 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.8911
nag Kfsccrs
n/.c •¦u;* '
1
2
3
4
IM St- 1"T li.f.
NY NF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
pioh dif p v.-.. H2u(iN. t-.so)
703.6 (27
.7)
713.7 (28.1)
756.9 (29
.8)
713.7 (28
.1)
PLC-'fl- ! M t T r' f )
452.1 (17
.8)
464.8 (18.3)
515.6 120
.3)
462.3 (18
.2)
riOi1'. INLM lc' i'. CtOfrC.. F )
54.4 1130.0)
54.4 1130.0)
54.4 1130.0)
54.4 (130.01
l-t 1.f t vj'.LtjT 1 IIV»
7167.
8068.
8320.
7165.
Tift SITUM'S
272.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
Tf'tU ric. j T!; • CC. ' i. 1 J ( 5 ( S C F )
180.2 ( 63b3.)
203.0 ( 7169.)
207.3 ( 7324.)
179.8 ( 6352.)
I'L SA"I»L» rt li */r ANM /t'Hf
18.6/ 3/
106.
17.8/ 3/ 178.
21.3/ 3/
213.
19.3/ 3/
193.
I'C "Ci.-M ft t; k/XAtioi./CPN
1.7/ 3/
17.
1.7/ 3/ 17.
1.7/ 3/
17.
1.6/ 3/
16.
IT i'-fi'tl I« F/t.**«i.l/i»P*
31.7/ 3/
743.
40.5/ 3/ 967.
79.3/ 3/2136.
37*1/ 3/
880.
Cf) PCkckp fLli.-:/i-:Ahoi/HPr
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/ 3/ 2.
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/ 3/
2.
Ci Sr.r.,'17 *l H i /*/.hCI /i'CT
13.3/ 3/
.21
22.6/ 3/ .37
57.2/ 3/
1.01
13.6/ 3/
.21
PC.ft-'lt ft'T< F./KAMUf/PCI
3.5/ 3/
.05
3.2/ 3/ .05
3.5/ 3/
.05
3.4/ 3/
.05
01 t;v\ SA.'i'ii y" || /•VP
10.8/ 2/
11.
27.1/ 2/ 27.
37.3/ 3/
112.
11.1/ 2/
11.
' NTX Mf.Kr.Ki) M 11 /HHM
1.3/ 2/
1.
1.3/ 2/ 1.
.3/ 3/
1.
1.3/ 2/
1.
VO
l lt'jT 1 i::V f'/.f;f
44.42
Z7.4B
10.84
41.78
i-r i • T -r I' % IV;'.
169.
162.
198.
177.
cr .iTK/.THilt PJ>n
730.
948.
2069.
864.
CIV CJ>l.iM»sll.iN PCI
.16
.32
.96
.16
Ml? I "Jf-. Ci'f
9.5
25.8
111.1
9.8
(T. r A ' s
17.60
18.92
' 23.63
18.40
Cli fA»S
153.14
224.03
499.52
180.97
cci2 .''¦•ss s
519.4
1185.0
3641.0
539.9
\'l V "AS'j ^ j
2.93
8.94
39.26
3.01
FUl-L Kl- 1 L )
.257
( .57)
.503 ( 1.11) 1.419
( 3.13)
.278
t .61)
v.;«?-?!>• I " "" ~ .51 1 .b«) 1.26 ( 1.69) *.39 < 5.891 .51 ( .661
I'SMC ¦ »•:- U./*!-.' M-' )
TiTfrr/V T- P^/hc' i;- )
psci'v" ri-"7r.p">u >_
"7!
i' ¦; i- f i
r. i
•#;r
I ! ' :
'"•/ "
;i.t !
•!•
300.24 ( 223.89)
10ie.22~"( 759.291
177.29 I 132.18)
113.73 ( 84.81)
357.96 ( 266.93)
937.59 I 699.16)
628.99 ( 616.18)
1067.94 I 796.36)
5. 74 C
".504 T
4.23)
.82)1"
7.07 I
5.28)
8.94 (
6.67)
5.96 (
.398 I
.655)
.323 (
.531)
.550 (
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FUR 4 BAGS
A. ( i
' 11 . / 7
. " • '> i
I-•; .• .
•>. i ?
. i» i-
( h. >i j\
( 4.7*)
lilH.^c)
I I
{ J
C . 1
9UMM filTIr"
sah?le flow
MULTIPLIER FUR"
MULTIPLIER FSfT
' >iuit i>'CfVfij;Fur
i\i X 20 f lLTlKS
>A,lfLt tLDH
scmscF)
t?test
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
0.0000 (0.0000)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL! 0.0000 10.0000)
sckscf )
0.00 (
0.01
4.45)
.905)
-------
TABLE B-10A. TEST 5-3 EMISSIONS RESULT?
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5099-0111
ENGINE NO.CHSbb
ENGINE MODEL b9 CHEV 3bb
ENGINE b.U 1(31.1. CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 71(1.12 MM HG(29.17 IN HG)
DRV BULB TEMP. 2b.? DEG CCBO.n DEC F)
TEST NO. 5-3
DATE 12/19/78
TIME 08130
DYNO NO, 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
BAG CART NU. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 33 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.3 GM/KG( 51.3 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .899?
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOMER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOMER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
b70.b (2b.9)
999.5 (17.5)
S*.* (13n.n)
7Ib8
272.0
182.9 ( b991)
2
Lanf
bBS.8 (27.0)
9b2.3 (18.2)
59.9 (130.0)
8089
307.0
2US.9 ( 7259)
3
LAF
72b.9 (28.b)
508.0 (20.0)
59.9 (130.0)
8320
315.9
210.2 ( 7923)
9
NYNF
bSS.S (27.0)
959.7 (18.1)
59.9 (130.41)
71b9
272.0
181.9 ( b92b)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRO
cos Sample
C02 BCKGRD
® NO* SAMPLE
w NOX BCKGRD
O
METER/RANGE/PPM
meter/range/ppm
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
91.1/ 3/ 911
1.8/ 3/ 18
3b.7/ 3/ 1082
,b/ 3/ 18
lb.8/ 3/ .27
3.0/ 3/ .05
b.b/ 2/ 7
.5/ 2/ 1
32.17
399
1098
.22
b.l
b9.7/ 3/ 2051
,7/ 3/ , 21
3/
3b.0/ 3/ 3bO 39.7/ 3/ 3*7
1.8/ 3/ 18 1,7/ 3/ 17
79.b/ 2/ 5170
.1/ 2/ b
29.5/ 3/ .99 b2.0/ 3/ 1.09,
2.b/ 3/ ,09 2,9/ 3/ ,09
23.1/ 2/ 23 90,n/ 2/ 90
.b/ 2/ 1 .8/ 2/ 1
18,*8 8.23
393 332
i9^o sum
.95 1.0b
28.5 39.3
2b.9/ 3/ 2b9
1.7/ 3/ 17
39.7/ 3/ 1170
.7/ 3/
15.8/ 3/
2.2/3/
8,b/ 2/
l.U/ 2/
39.03
297
1131
.22
7«b
21
.25
.03
9
1
HC MASS GRAMS
91.90
90.b3
90,2S
25,97
CO MASS GRAMS
222.97
97b.02
1223,87
239,71
C02 MASS GRAMS
799. b
lb9«.b
9085,1
731,7
NOX MASS GRAMS
1.92
7.9b
19.21
2.39
FUEL KG (LB)
.388
(
.8b)
.811
(
1.79)
1.939
I
9.2b)
.375
(
.83)
KM HR (HP HR)
.2b
(
.35)
1.93
(
1.92)
5.19
I
b. 89)
.5b
(
.75)
BSHC G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
157.98
(
117.99)
28.33
(
21.12)
7.83
I
5.89)
9b, lb
(
3*.*2)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
89b.32
(
b31.in)
331.90
(
297.50)
238,23
i
177.bS)
92b.05
(
317.71)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
28Sl.b9
(212b.S'l)
1181.55
(
881,08)
795,18
I
592.97)
1300.bO
(
9b9.8b)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
7.30
(
5.95)
5.55
(
9.19)
2.77
I
2.0b)
9.25
(
3.17)
B3FC KG/KM HH (LB/HP HR)
1.97b
(
2,92b)
.585
(
.929)
.377
(
.b!9)
.bb?
(
l.n97)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 9 BA6S
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 9 BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM HK (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KM hH (G/HP HR)
8SC02 «/KM HH (G/HP HH)
BSNOX G/KM HH (G/HP HR)
0SFC KG/KM HH (LB/HP HH)
7.90 ( 9.92)
20.09 ( 19.95)
292.29 (217,9b)
982 ( 732)
3.58 ( 2,b7)
,*79 ( ,?*«)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MiH.Tim.Kft roa*
multiplier for
MULTIPLIER for
cn X 211 FILTERS
• kVVL* »l-«»
SCM(SCF)
G/IEST
G/KM HR (G/HP MR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL)
o.nou i n.oo)
o.uoo
u.nnoo (u,oooo)
0,0ooo (o.oooo)
«CH(SCf>
-------
TABLE B-10A (CONT'D). TEST 5-3 HUSSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.CH3bb
ENGINE MODEL b9 CHEV Bbb
ENGINE b.U L(3bb CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 7*0.12 MM HG(29.17 IN HG)
DRY BULK TEMP. 2*.* DEG C(7b.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM, H20(IN. H20)
BLOHER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
blomer inlet temp. deg. ccdeg. f>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
® NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
U NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
M
DILUTION factor
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COK CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS grams
COS MASS grams
NOX MASS GRAMS
PUEL K6 (LB)
KH HX (HP HR)
RSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
RSCO G/KN HH (G/HP HR)
HSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HP)
BSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR)
7.71 ( 10.33)
lb.2b ( 12.12)
251.*8 (187.S3)
9*2 ( 703)
3.91 ( 2.92)
.*38 ( .720)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NU. 11-501 -Oil 1
TEST NO. 5-3 RUN
DATE 12/19/78
TIME 09111b GASOLINE trt-2b?-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CARI NU. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.3 G«/KG( 51.1 GRAINS/LB) MUX HUMIDITY C.F. .89911
1
NYNF
bb8.0 (2b.3)
***.5 (17.5)
S*.* (1311.0)
71 b5
272.0
182.3 ( b*39)
**.2/ 3/ **2
1,7/ 3/ 17
37,1/ 3/ 109*
.7/ 3/ 21
15.*/ 3/ .25
l.b/ 3/ ,02
9,2/ 2/ 9
.9/ 2/ 1
33.73
*2b
1055
,22
8.3
2
LANF
b83.3 (2b.9)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
8085
30 '.0
205.* ( 7255)
23.*/ 3/ 23*
1,8/ 3/ 18
bl,*/ 3/ 1808
.8/ 3/ 2*
27,7/ 3/ ,*b
1.5/ 3/ ,02
19,3/ 2/ 19
.9/ 2/ 1
20. *0
217
1?*?
.*3
18.*
3
LAF,
72b.* (28.b)
508.0 (20.U)
5*.* (130.U)
831b
31l», 0
210.1 ( 7*19)
30,7/ 3/ 307
1,8/ 3/ 18
71,7/ 2/ *b5b
.2/ 2/ 12
bl.7/ 3/ 1.09
1,7/ 3/ .03
51,7/ 2/ ,52
1,0/ 2/ 1
8.5*
291
**98
1,0b
50,8
*
NYNF
bBS.B (27.0)
*59,7 (18.1)
5*.* (130.U)
71b2
272.0
181.9 ( b*25)
20.3/ 3/ 203
1.7/ 3/ 17
33.0/ 3/ 97*
.9/ 3/ 28
lb.*/ 3/ .2b
1.7/ 3/ .03
9,5/ 2/ 10
1,0/ 2/ 1
35.*2
18b
931
.2*
8.5
**,7*
25,b9
35.27
19,5b
223.97
*17.93
1098.81
197.22
7*0.7
lb35.0
*09b,*
789.7
2. bl
«».S1
18,3b
2.b7
.389
(
,8b)
,7*8
(
l.bS)
1.871
I
*.12)
. 3bb
(
.81)
.5b
(
.75)
l,*b
(
1.9b)
5.12
I
b.87)
.5b
(
.75)
80.18
(
59.79)
17.58
(
13,11)
b.88
I
5,13)
3*.77
(
25,93)
*01.37
(
299.3H)
285.89
(
213,19)
21*.*b
C
159,93)
350,5*
(
2bl.*0)
327,*5
(
989,88)
1118,*2
(
83*,01)
799,53
I
59b.21)
1*03,bO
(10*b,b?)
*.b8
(
3.*9)
*.»b
(
3.32)
3.58
I
2 • b7)
*.7*
(
3.S*)
, b97
(
1.1*7)
.512
(
.8*1)
. 3b5
I
.bOO)
.bSl
(
1.070)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
u.oun ( 0.00)
o.oon
u.nonn (o.nono)
u.nooo (u.oooo)
2n X 2n FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
11.011 ( 0,0)
-------
TABLE B-10B. TEST 5-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.CHSbb
engine model h chev 3bb
ENGINE b.O L(3bb CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 735.58 HH HG(28.9b IN HG)
Our BULB TEHP. 21.1 OEG C(85.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
PAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H80(IN, H20)
BLONER IMLET P HH. H20(IN, H20)
BLONER IMLET TEMP. DEG. C(0EG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO*! STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD NETER/NANGE/PCT
f NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
U> NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
N)
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
8SC02 G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
8SN0X G/KN HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
7,39 ( s.ql)
17.7b ( 13.25)
290,1b (?lb.hO)
lObO ( 74(1)
*.fc8 ( a.*")
."Mb C .815)
COLD TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 5-1 RUN
OATE 12/20/78
time 08119
OVNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDIT* 38 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KG( 71.0
PROJECT NO. ll-50l«-0iil
GASOLINE IM-Zb7-F
bag cari NO. 2
GRAlNS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. ,<4815
1
NVNF
b70.b (2b.1)
Sit.5 (17.5)
51.1 (13P.0)
71bb
272,0
1811,9 ( b391)
<11.5/ 3/ 115
1.5/ 3/ 15
39,9/ 3/ 117b
,8/ 3/ 21
17,2/ 3/ ,28
2,8/ 3/ ,01
b.2/ 2/ b
,1/ 2/ 0
2
lANF
b85.8 (27,0)
1b2,3 (18,2)
51,1 (130,0)
8o8b
30', 0
203.7 ( 719b)
32.5/ 3/ 325
1.8/ 3/ 18
71.8/ 3/ 2200
.9/ 3/ 28
31.1/ 3/ ,52
2,b/ 3/ ,01
18,1/ 2/ 18
,1/ 2/ 0
3
LAF
72b.1 (28.b)
508,0 (20.U)
51.1 (130.0)
8317
31b,0
208.5 ( 73b3)
31.b/ 3/ 31b
1.8/ 3/ 18
78,1/ 2/ 50?3
,3/ 2/ 18
fc7,0/ 3/ 1.19
2,5/ 3/ .01
58.2/ 2/ 58
.1/ 2/ 0
NYNF
bB5.8 (27.0)
159.7 (18.1)
51,1 (130.ll)
71b2
272,0
180.5
(
b37h)
18,2/
3/
182
1.8/
3/
18
3b,7/
3/
1082
.7/
3/
21
17.9/
3/
.e^
2.7/
3/
.0*
8,9/
2/
9
.«¦/
2/
1
30,97 17,12 7.82 32.53
100 308 300 lbS
1132 212S 1878 1012
.23 .18 1.1b .25
b.l 18.3 57.9 8.3
11,79 3b,20 3b,11 17.13
238.15 SO*.10 1181.22 219.12
77b.1 1807.1 112b.b 818.0
2.07 7,00 22,bl 2,82
,10S ( .89) .85b ( 1.89) 2,018 i 1.45) .381 ( ,85)
.21 ( .33) 1,1b ( 1.95) 5.12 I b.8b) ,57 ( ,7b)
170,99
( 127,51)
2*.81
(
18.52)
7,OS
I
5.2b)
30.20
( 22.52)
975.SB
( 727.19)
315,92
(
257,95)
231,31
I
172.51)
38b.29
( 288.0b)
3175.22
(23b7,7b)
1210.28
(
921.88)
8b1.75
(
bll.81)
1112.07
(11175.35)
8.18
( b.33)
».81
(
3.58)
1.12
I
3.30)
1.97
( 3.71)
l.bSS
( 2.721)
.587
(
. 9b5 )
.391
(
• b»8)
• b7b
( 1.112)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90KH FILTER
SAMPLE FLOM SCM(SCF) O.UOO I 0.011)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/TEST 0.000
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 11,0000 (0.0000)
MULTIPLIED FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) U.OOOn (O.OOOO)
2f> x en filters
8AMPLE FLO* SCM(SCF) 0,00 ( 0,0)
-------
TABLE B-10B (CONT'D). TEST 5-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.CHSbb
ENGINE MODEL b"» CHEV 3bt>
ENGINE b.U L(3bb CIO) V-8
CVS NO. <1
BAROMETER 735,58 KM HG(28.4b IN HG)
ORY BIIL8 TEMP. 30.b OEG C(87.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
hc Sample meter/range/ppm
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
COS SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
W NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
W NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
U>
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COz CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
1" HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS •» BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KH HH (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KH HH (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KH HR (LB/HP HR)
?.7«» ( 10.*5)
11.81 ( R.80)
241.75 (lBb.24)
101S ( 75?)
4.47 ( 3*71)
.45b ( .744)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, 11-SD44-0U1
TEST NO. 5-1 RUN
DATE 12/20/78
TIME 08GASOLINE fcM-2b7-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3* PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG( 78.2 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.IUS1
1
NYNF
bb8.0 (2b.3)
444.5 (17.5)
St.* (130.0)
71 b3
272,0
180.1 ( b388)
14.5/ 3/ US
1.5/ 3/ IS
32.5/ 3/ SbO
.7/ 3/ 21
18,4/ 3/ .30
2,4/ 3/ *0*
"»,?/ 2/ 10
,4/ 2/ 0
32,72
180
121
.2b
1.3
2
lanf
b83.3 (2b.1)
*57,2 (18.0)
51.* (130,0)
bobs
307,0
203.8 ( 7200)
2)1,1/ 3/ 201
1,4/ 3/ 1*
55,7/ 3/ lb40
,7/ 3/ 21
30,2/ 3/ ,50
2,5/ 3/ ,0*
21,1/ 2/ 21
,2/ 2/ 0
11.bB
188
1583
.4b
20.q
3
LAF
72b.4 (28.b)
50B.0 (20.0)
54,4 (130,0)
B31b
31b,0
208,4 ( 73b2)
31,1/ 3/ 311
l.b/ 3/ lb
7b,2/ 2/ *141
,3/ 2/ 18
b7,2/ 3/ 1,20
2,3/ 3/ .0*
b0,0/ 2/ bO
,3/ 2/ 0
7,8b
21?
4757
1.17
51,7
4
NYNF
bSS.B (27,0)
451,7 (18.1)
54.4 (130.U)
71b2
272.0
180.5 ( b37b)
lb.3/ 3/ lfe3
1.b/ 3/ lb
37.0/ 3/ 1011
.7/ 3/ 21
18.b/ 3/ .30
2.b/ 3/ .0*
1.2/ 2/ 1
,7/ 2/ 1
31,70
148
1050
.2b
8,5
18,82
22.07
35,71
15, 3b
H*,Ob
375.85
1154,b2
220,71
8b2,4
1733.1
4451,S
Bb2,l
3.27
8.28
24,18
2."
.387
(
.85)
.755
(
l.bb)
2,011
I
4.43)
,31?
(
,87)
.5b
(
.75)
1,48
(
1,18)
5,15
I
b.SO)
,bO
(
,81)
33,4b
(
24.IS)
14,15
(
11,15)
b.94
{
5.1?)
25,42
(
18,Sb)
3*4,12
(
257.21)
254.bl
(
181,12)
224.35
i
lb?.30)
3b5,48
(
272,54)
1532,71
(1143.00)
1174.»l
(
875,75)
8b4,«H
I
b4*.11)
1427,11
(lHb4.H)
5.81
(
4.33)
S.bl
(
4,18)
4.70
I
3.SO)
4,<14
(
3 • bl)
. bR8
(
1.130)
.511
(
,841)
.311
(
.b42)
, bSb
(
1.079)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOM
MULTIPLIES FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/fEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
o.ooo c o.oo)
ii,nun
o.ooun (u.ctuoo)
n.OUOO (11,0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0.0(1 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE B-11A. TEST 9-1 HUSSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.CH3bb
engine model -u chev abb
ENGINE b.O L(3bb CID) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 7*7.78 NN HG(29.11 IN HG)
ORY BULB TEMP. 25.b DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20CTN. HaO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN, H80)
blower inlet temp. deg. chdeg. f>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE meter/range/ppm
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
? NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
U NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS 6RAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM Hr (G/Hp Mr)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (6/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KH HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC 6/KM HN (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/Hp Hp)
BSNOX G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KC/KH HR (LB/HP HR)
7.bS ( 111.2b)
12.9b C 9,bb)
187.71 (1111.0(1)
91? ( 70b)
5.57 ( 1.15)
,
-------
TABLE B-11A (CONT'D). TEST 9-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, ii-5o**-om
ENGINE N0.CH3bb
engine model -o chev abb
ENGINE b.O L(3bb CIO) V-8
CVS NO, 9
BAROMETER 7*7,78 MM HG(?9,** IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.b DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG, F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? sample meter/range/pct
CO? BCKGRO MEIER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
w
I
w
in
TEST NO, 9-1 RUN
OATE 3/15/7*
TIME 101*1
OYNO NO, ?
GASOLINE tM-eb?-F
BAG CAR1 NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY lb PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3,3 GM/KG( 23,3 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMlDITir C.F. .80*5
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.4)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*,* (130,0)
71bS
272,0
183,8 ( b*91)
2b,1/ 3/
1,0/ 3/
2S,7/ 3/
1,0/ 3/
lb,5/ 3/
2,8/ 3/
12,2/ ?/
,3/ ?/
Sbl
in
878
31
.2b
.0*
12
0
2
LANF
711,2 (28,0)
*72,* (18,b)
5*,* (130.0)
8085
307,0
207,0 ( 7312)
lb.9/ 3/ lb9
1,1/ 3/ 11
**.5/ 3/ 1311
1,2/ 3/ 37
27,5/ 3/ ,15
2,5/ 3/ ,0*
25,b/ 2/ 2b
,3/ 2/ 0
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21.3)
5*,* (130.0)
8318
31b, o
211,* ( 7*b5)
22,3/ 3/ 223
1,2/ 3/ 12
9*.9/ 3/ 2751
1,3/ 3/
bl.q/ 3/
3,3/ 3/
89,b/ 2/
,*/ 2/
*»0
l.uq
.05
««o
o
*
NYNF
708,7 (27,9)
*b*•8 (18.3)
5*,* (130.0)
71b*
272.0
183,b ( b*B*)
13,*/ 3/
1,2/ 3/
28,8/ 3/
1,5/ 3/
1b,1/ 3/
2.9/ 3/
11,1/ 2/
,5/ 2/
13*
12
852
*b
.2b
.U*
11
1
DILUTION FACTUR
35.55
22,37
9,b9
37,7b
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
?S1
158
212
122
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
839
1258
2b51
799
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.22
.*2
1,05
.21
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
11.«»
25. 3
89,2
10.b
HC MASS GRAMS
2b.b*
18.92
25,87
12.95
CO MASS GRAMS
179,b2
303.17
bS2(*S
170,7*
CO? MASS GRAMS
7*8.1
1578.b
*050,1
719,5
NOX MASS GRAMS
3,37
8.0b
21,03
3,00
FUFL KG (LB)
,351
(
.77)
• bb7
(
1,*7)
l,b2b
I
3.58)
,32*
(
.72)
KW HR (HP HR)
.59
(
.?«0
l.*b
(
l."»b)
5,02
(
b,7*)
.SB
(
.78)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
*5,12
(
33.b*)
12,9*
(
S.bS)
5.15
(
3.8*)
22,28
(
lb.bl)
BSCo G/KW Hr (G/HP Hr)
30*.2*
(
22b.87)
207.3?
(
15*.bO)
129,90
(
9b.8b)
293,72
(
219,02)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
12b7.19
(
9**.9*)
1079,*9
(
80*,97)
80b,35
I
bOl.SU)
1237,78
(
923,01)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
5.70
(
*.25)
5.51
(
*,11)
S, 78
I
*,31)
5.lb
(
3,85)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
.595
(
.979)
.*Sb
(
.750)
.32"»
I
.532)
,558
(
.917)
TOTAL test RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
RSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
RSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
7,bb ( 10,27)
11,02 ( 8,22)
17n,5b (127,19)
927 ( b91)
S.b8 ( *,23)
,388 ( ,b37)
90HM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 211 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0,000 ( 0,00)
n.000
11,0000 (0,0000)
0,0000 (0,0000)
(i.on ( o.o)
-------
TABLE B-11B. TEST 9-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.CHSbb
ENGINE MODEL -0 CHEV 3hb
ENGINE b.n L(3bb CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 738*12 MM HG(29.0b IN HG)
dry bulb temp. zb.<* deg C(B9.o deg F)
bag results
bag number
DESCRIPTION
BLONER OIF P MH. H20fIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HSOCIN. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEhP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLONER REVOLUTIONS
TINE SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CO. METRES(SCF)
HC sample METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SANPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
COa SANPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COg BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PCT
w NOX SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPN
U> NOX BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPN
O*
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COe CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC NASS GRAHS
CO MASS grams
CO? NASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KN HR (HP HR)
8SHC G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSC08 G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS « BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KM HN (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
7.51 ( 1(1.IB)
lb.24 ( 12.11)
195.95 (19b. 12)
970 ( 72*)
5.83 ( 1.35)
.*19 ( .889)
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. U-5044-001
TEST NO. 9-3 RUN
DATE 3/19/79
TIME 09111 GASOLINE tM-gbJ-F
DVNO NO, 2 BAG CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUHIDITV S3 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 13.b GN/KG( S5.S GRAINs/LB) NOX HUHIDITV C,F. l.lObB
NYNF
b9b.O (27.4)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71bS
271.9
181.3 ( b403)
4b.2/ 3/
9.0/ 3/
33.7/ 3/
,b/ 3/
IB.b/ 3/
2,8/ 3/
8.7/ 2/
.9/ 2/
4b2
90
995
18
.30
,09
9
0
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
972.9 (18.b)
59.9 (130,0)
8085
30?.0
209.2 ( 7212)
29,5/ 3/ 29S
3.1/ 3/ 31
97.b/ 3/ 1402
.b/ 3/ 18
29.b/ 3/ .99
2.7/ 3/ .09
25.0/ 2/ 25
.1/ 2/ 0
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
541.0 (21.3>
59.4 (130,0)
8319
31b,0
208,5 ( 73b»)
3b,5/ 3/ 3bS
2,7/ 3/ 27
52.8/ 2/ 3414
1.8/ 3/ 55
b3.0/ 3/ 1.11
2,b/ 3/ ,04
b4 . 3/ 2/ b4
1.2/ 2/ 1
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
9b9,8 (IB.3)
54.4 (130.0)
71b4
272.0
181.1 ( b39b)
14.b/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
30.7/ 3/
1.0/ 3/
15.b/ 3/
2,3/ 3/
7.b/ 2/
1,3/ 2/
14b
25
9U7
31
.25
.04
8
1
30.27
20.59
9.07
38.05
923
21b
341
122
954
1347
3234
858
• 2b
.45
1.08
.21
8.3
2*.9
b3,2
b, 3
49.2b
25.38
41,00
12,71
201.47
320.38
785,1b
180.91
85b.1
lbSS.l
4115.7
711,9
3.19
10,77
27,91
2,43
.919
(
.91)
.715
(
1,58)
1,727
I
3.81)
.32?
(
.72)
»b9
(
.8b)
1.97
(
1,97)
4.91
I
b.58)
.57
(
.??)
b9. 12
(
51.54)
17.2S
(
12.8b)
".35
I
b.23)
22,21
(
lb.5b)
314.b3
(
234.b?)
21?.79
(
lb2,37)
159,93
I
119.2b)
31b,lb
(
235.7b)
133b.93
(
99b.95)
1145.22
(
853.99)
B38.3b
I
b25.17)
1244.08
I
927.71)
9.98
(
3.72)
'.32
(
5,4b)
S.b9
I
4.24)
4.24
(
3.1b)
.b4b
(
l,0b3)
,48b
(
.794)
.352
I
.578)
.571
(
.939)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM FILTER
SANPLE FLOM
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOM SCN(SCF)
SCH(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL)
0.000 I 0.00)
0,000
o.nooo (u.oooo)
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE B-11B (CONT'D). TEST 9-3 ET1ISSI0NS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.CH3bb
ENGINE MODEL -0 CHEV 3bb
ENGINE b.O L(3bb CID) V-B
CVS NO. <1
BAROMETER 738.12 MM HG(29.0b IN H6)
DRV BULB TEMp. 31.1 DEC C(B8.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM, H20CIN, H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
blower inlet temp. deg. c
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TINE SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
hc sample meter/range/ppm
HC 8CKGR0 METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
® NOX SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
U> NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
-J
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
Krt HR (HP MR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/Krt HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KH HR (HP HK)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
7.53 ( 10.10)
10.H7 ( 7.SI)
187.82 (131.bl)
972 ( 725)
b.l* ( *.57)
.*10 ( .b73)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NU. U-50M-0U1
TEST NO. *-3 RUN
DATE 3/19/79
TIME 09150 GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CAR1 NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ** PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 13.0 GM/KG( SO.8 GRAlNS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0805
1 2 3 *
NYNF.. LANF LAF NYNF
b9b.O (27.*) 711.2 (28.0) 7b2.0 (30.0) 708.7 (27.9)
*57.2 (1B.0) *72.1 (18.b) 5*1.0 (21.3) *b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0) 52.2 (12b.0) 5*.* (130.0) 5*.* (130.(1)
71b3 808* 831(i 71b2
272.0 30b.9 31b.0 272.0
181.2 ( b*01) 205.5 ( 7257) 208.* ( 73bl) 1B1.0 ( b39»)
lb.9/ 3/ lb9 17.3/ 3/ 173 2b.0/ 3/ 2b0 lb.5/ 3/ lbS
1.9/ 3/ 11 2.0/ 3/ 20 l.b/ 3/ lb l.B/ 3/ 18
27,0/ 3/ 799 **.0/ 3/ 129b 51.9/ 2/ 335* 29.5/ 3/ 872
.8/ 3/ 2* .8/ 3/ 2* 1.0/ 3/ 31 .9/ 3/ 28
18.0/ 3/ .29 29.1/ 3/ .*8 b3,5/ 3/ 1.12 lb.*/ 3/ .2b
2,b/ 3/ ,0* 3.0/ 3/ .05 3.*/ 3/ .05 2.7/ 3/ .n*
10.b/ 2/ 11 23.1/ 2/ 23 70,3/ 2/ ?0 8,U/ 2/ 8
.2/ 2/ 0 .5/ 2/ 1 ,b/ 2/ 1 ,9/ 2/ 1
3*.8b 21.** 9.10 3b,79
151 15* 2*b 1*7
7bn 12*2 3207 829
.25 .** 1.08 .22
10,* 22.b bS.B 7.1
15,7*
18,2*
29,5*
15,*0
lbO.35
297,27
778,22
17*.71
831,5
lb*5.*
*i09,8
73b. 2
3.90
9.bl
30,05
2,b7
.357
(
.79)
¦ bB*
(
1.51)
1.711
I
3.77)
. 33*
(
.'»)
.<•1
(
.82)
1,**
(
1.93)
•»,91
i
b. 58)
• SB
(
.77)
25,8b
(
19.28)
12,b?
(
9,*5)
b,02
(
•Ml)
2b,70
(
H.91)
2b3.50
(
19b.*9)
20b,*9
(
153.98)
158,52
I
118.21)
302.92
(
225.89)
13bb.39
(1018.92)
11*8,91
(
852.27)
837,1*
I
b2*,2b)
127b.52
(
951,90)
b.*n
(
* . 78)
b.b7
C
*.98)
b, 12
I
*.5b)
* ,b2
(
3.*5)
.587
(
.9bS)
.*75
(
.781)
.3*8
I
.573)
.579
(
.952)
PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF) 0,00(1 ( 0.00)
MULTIPLIED FOR G/TEST 0.000
MULTIPLIED FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 0.001)0 (U.OOOO)
MULTIPLIED FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) U.OOOO (U.OOOO)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF) 0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE B-12A. TEST 13r2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, 11-5011-OH1
ENGINE NO.F 3hn
engine mudel -u Ford 3bo
ENGINE 5.9 L(3bn CIO) V-8
CVS NO. q
BAROMETER 7H.73 mm HGC29.32 IN HG)
Dry bulb temp. 27.b oeg c(82.o deg F)
TEST NO. 13-2 RUN
DATE b/2b/79
TIME 119111b
0YNO NO. 2
GASOLINE tM-2(,7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY S3 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUmIOITV 18.5 GM/KGC 87.8 GrAInS/LB)
MUX HUMIOIT* C.F. I.llb39
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H2U)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HSO(IN. H20)
Blower inlet je«p. deg. ccdeg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* 3TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
® NOX SAMPLE
Ut NOX BCKGRD
03
meter/range/ppm
mETEN/RANGE/PPH
MEItR/RANGE/PPM
meier/range/ppm
MEIER/RANGE/PCT
MtTER/RANGE/PCT
ME fEH/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRAIION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCf
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
1
NYNF
bib.n (27.i)
157.2 C1B.H)
si.i (i3n,n)
71b3
278.0
182.9 ( blbl)
32.7/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
*0.3/ 3/
.1/ 3/
20.8/ 3/
3.1/ 3/
7.3/ 2/
.9/ 2/
29.01
303
938
.?«
b.1
327
25
9b2
2
,3»
.05
7
1
2
lanf
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
51.1 (130.0)
B083
SO'.O
20b.1 ( 7279)
20.2/ 3/
2.*/ 3/
"~5
:»
202
21
3/ 1097
.1/ 3/
32,1/ 3/
3,b/ 3/
21,8/ 2/
1.0/ 2/
20.30
179
lUbS
.18
20.8
2
.53
(0b
22
1
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.U)
511.0 (21.3)
51.1 (130.0)
8313
31b.0
210.3 ( 7128)
21.3/ 3/ 213
2.5/ 3/ 25
59.b/ 2/ 3022
.2/ 2/ 8
73.9/ 3/ 1,31
1,3/ 3/ .07
92.1/ 2/ 92
1.5/ 2/ 2
8.08
221
2H8b
1.29
90.8
1
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
Ibl.8 (18.3)
51.1 (130.0)
71b2
272.0
182.7 ( bisi)
12.7/ 3/
2.3/ 3/
31.1/ 3/
.1/ 3/
20.b/ 3/
1.1/ 3/
13.1/ 2/
1.7/ 2/
31.b?
10S
783
.27
11.8
127
23
811
9
.33
.lib
13
2
HC MASS GRAMS
31.9b
21.30
2b. 82
11.01
CO MASS GRAMS
199.72
255.bS
70b.7b
lbb.71
CO? MASS GRAMS
951. b
1811,1
1953.2
90b,5
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.39
8.71
38.8b
1.37
FUEL KG (L»)
.•»32
C
.•*5)
.720
(
1.59)
1.938
I
1.27)
.379
(
.81)
KM HR (HP HR)
.b0
<
.81)
l.bO
(
2.15)
5. 35
(
7.18)
.73
(
.98)
BSMC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
53.11
(
31.b3)
13.30
(
H.92)
5.Ul
(
3.71)
15.11
C
11.29)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HW)
332.12
(
217.hb)
159.bb
(
119.(Jb)
132.05
I
98.17)
228.b3
(
170.19)
BSC02 G/KM HR (G'HP HR)
1587.11
(1183.75)
1133.19
(
815.02)
925.15
C
b90.ll)
1213.2b
(
927.10)
BSNOX G/Kk HR (G/HP HH)
3.98
C
2.97)
5.1b
c
1.07)
7.2b
C
5.11)
5.99
(
1.17)
BSFC KG/KM HK (LB/HP HH)
.718
C
1.181)
.1511
(
.739)
, 3b2
C
.595)
.520
(
.855)
TOTAL TEST results 1 BAGS
TOTAL KM MR (HK HR) 8.28 ( 11.11)
BSMC G/KM HK (G/HP HK) 11.00 ( 8.211)
BSCO G/KM MR (G/HP HK) lbll.11 (119.(.2)
BSC02 G/KM HK (6/Hp Hh) J0*2 ( 777)
BSNO* G/KW HH (G/Hp Nh) b.Sb ( 1.R9)
BSFC KG/KM MK (LB/HP HR) .119 ( .bflt)
particulate data* total for i bags
9I1MM filter
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED for
MULTIPLIER FOR
multiplier for
zn X ?0 FtLTEHS
SAMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
g/test
G/KM MR (G/H|> HR)
G/kG fuel CG/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
U.000 ( 0.00)
u.uoo
ii.oono (u.uono)
u.oooo (0.00110)
o.au ( o.o)
-------
TABLE B-12A (CONT'D). TEST 13-2 EHISSIOMS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.F 3HI1
Engine morel -o ford 3bo
ENGINE S.9 L(3bU CIO) V-8
cvs no. 9
BAROMETER 7*1.73 MM HG(29.32 IN HG)
ORY BULB TEHP. 2B.3 DEG C(R3.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H?0(1M. H20)
BLONER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEhP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
W NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
(i, NO* BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
VO
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRA1ION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KN HR (HP MR)
BSHC G/KH HR tG/HP HR)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/Hp HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL test RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL M MR (HK HR)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KM Hk (G/Hp Htf)
BSNOX G/KH HR (U/HP HH)
BSFC KG/K* HR (LB/HP HR)
8.*5 (
7.28 (
123.05 (
9H5 (
7.25 (
.379 (
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. U-S011-0U1
TEST NO. 13-2 RUN
DATE b/2b/79
TIME 09t1b GASOLINE tM-gb7-F
DYNO NO. ? BAG CARI NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5* PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 13.3 G*/KG( 93.* GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F, 1.091*
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.*)
157.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71bl
27?,0
182,9 ( b*b0)
13.8/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
2*.7/ 3/
.2/ 3/
H.7/ 3/
*.2/ 3/
11.9/ 2/
1.*/ 2/
3*. 70
11*
55*
.25
10.5
138
25
572
S
.32
,0b
12
1
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72,1 (18.b)
St.* (130.0)
8081
305,n
20b,0 ( 7277)
1*.3/ 3/
2.2/ 3/
29.b/ 3/
.*/ 3/
32.*/ 3/
3.8/ 3/
27.3/ 2/
1.*/ 2/
21.bl
122
bb*
.18
2b,o
1*3
22
b9l
9
.5*
.Ob
27
1
3
LAF
7b2.0 Ofl.U)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8313
31b.0
210.3 C ?*28)
22.H/ 3/ 22*
2.2/ 3/ 22
92,5/ 3/ ?»>3l
,3/ 3/ 7
71,9/ 3/ 1.30
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
9b,b/ 2/ S7
l.b/ 2/ 2
8.50
205
2513
1.25
95,2
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.B (18.3)
5*.* (130.U)
71bl
272.0
182.7 ( b*5* )
12.2/ 3/
2,b/ 3/
30,7/ 3/
.5/ 3/
19,3/ 3/
*.2/ 3/
12#*/ 2/
1,8/ 2/
31,17
97
b91
.25
10*7
122
2b
719
11
.31
.Ob
12
2
l?.no
1*.50
21.82
10,20
118.01
15^,23
blS,12
1*7,01
850.1
1822,7
1820.1
827,0
1.01
11,20
11,91
1.08
.339
(
.75)
.bb8 (
1.17)
1.819
I
1.08)
.311
(
,7b)
.71
(
.99)
l.b2 (
2.18)
S.31
(
7.17)
.71
(
1.00)
lb.?8
(
12.11)
8.93 (
b.bb)
l.bl
(
3.1b)
13.70
(
10.22)
lb0.23
(
J 19.19)
*8.07 (
73.13)
115.15
(
85.8b)
197,51
(
1*7,30)
1151.31
(
8bl|. 7q)
1122.5b (
837.Qq)
9»1.90
(
b72.55)
1111,30
(
828,70)
5.18
(
1.09)
b.90 (
S.H)
7,81
(
5.85)
5,18
(
*,08)
.IbO
(
.755)
.111 (
• b 7 b )
.31b
I
,5b9)
. 1b2
(
.759)
particulate daTa» tutal for i bags
11.33)
5.13)
9 I.7b)
731)
5.10)
,h?3)
9l(MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED Fok
MULTIPLIED FUR
2II
X ?H FILTERS
SAMI'lt FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
O.OOU ( 0.00)
u.oon
11.0000 (0.0000)
U.0000 (0.0000)
o.ao ( o.n)
-------
TABLE B-12B. TEST 13-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NU.F 3I>0
ENGINE model -0 FORD 3b0
ENGINE 5.1 L(3ta0 CIO) V-8
CVS NO. q
BAROMETER 7*5.21 MM MG(21.31 in ho
Or* BiiLB TEMp. 2S.b DEG C(7R.O DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM, H20(IN. H^0)
BLOWER IMLET P MM. H201IN. MgO)
BLOWER IMLET TEHP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
HLOmEh kEVULUIIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. MEfRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE mETFR/RANGE/PPM
hc bckgro meier/range/ppm
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRO METF.R/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE NETER/HANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
» NO* SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO MEIER/RANGE/PPM
O
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCI
NOX CONCENTRaIION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COg MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
fuel kg clb)
KM HR (MP HN)
BSMC G/KW HR (G/MP HR)
BSCO G/K1 HR IG/HP HK)
BSC02 G/KX HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK HH (G/HP MR)
BSFC K6/K* HR (LB/Hp H«)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL K«J Mr (hp HR)
BSHC G/KN HN (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/M HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/K* HR (G/Hp H«)
BSFC KG/Ko HR (LB/HP HR)
8.*3 ( 11,30)
12.?2 ( 1.»1)
lb*.SB (122.73)
X 11*10 ( 71 h)
b.*n ( ».??)
.*09 C .b73)
COLO TRANSIENT PKOJECT NU. 11-S0**-0M1
TEST NO. 13-3 RUN
DATE b/27/71
TIME 08151 GASOLINE tM-2b?-F
OYNO NO. 2 BAG CARI NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY S3 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.1 G
711.2 (28
.0)
7b2.ll (30
.»)
708.7
(27,
1)
157.2
(18
.0)
172.1 (IB
.b)
511.0 (21
1b1« 8
(18.
3)
51.1
(1311.0)
51.1 (130.0)
51.1 (130.U)
51.1
(130
.tl)
7lb3
8081
8313
71bO
272
307.0
31b. 0
272
.0
183.1
(
bibb)
20b.2 (
7285)
210.5 (
7131)
182,8
( b15 7
12.5/
3/
125
22.1/ 3/
221
25.3/ 3/
253
13. 1/
3/
131
2.2/
3/
22
2.2/ 3/
22
2.3/ 3/
23
2.1/
3/
21
12.7/
3/
1(125
*8.8/ 3/
mo
b 1.0/ 2/
3119
31,2/
3/
8llb
.1/
3/
2
.2/ 3/
5
.1/ 2/
1
.*/
3/
q
20.0/
3/
.32
32.0/ 3/
.53
72.5/ 3/
1.32
11.b/
3/
.31
3.5/
3/
.05
3.7/ 3/
(0b
1,1/ 3/
.Ob
3.1/
3/
.(lb
8.0/
2/
8
23.2/ 2/
23
91.9/ 2/
15
13.2/
2/
13
1.1/
2/
1
1.1/ 2/
1
1.3/ 2/
1
1.1/
2/
1
28. Hb
*0*
.27
b.1
2". 02
20U
1153
• 18
22.2
8.17
233
2183
1.2b
13.8
32. 89
in
771
,2b
12.1
1?.b3
23.80
28.2b
12.51
212.11
27b.SI
731.20
IbS.75
101. 7
1803,7
1B5b , 1
851,1
2.1b
8.8b
38,28
1,30
.*33
(
.lb)
,730
(
l.bl)
1,121
(
1.21)
, 3bb
(
.81)
»t> 7
c
.in)
l.b3
(
2.11)
5.37
(
7.21)
.75
(
1.01)
b3. 72
(
*7.52)
1*.51
(
10,88)
5,2b
(
3.12)
lb.bl
(
12.HI)
318.3b
(
237.10)
lb1.7b
(
12b,51)
13b,01
I
101.IS)
220,11
(
lb*.*2)
1352.21
(1008.10)
1105.7b
(
821,5b)
103,5b
I
b 7 3.71)
11*3.11
(
05 3. Ill )
3.b8
(
2.75)
S.13
(
1,05)
7.12
(
5.31)
5.72
(
*.27)
.b18
(
l.ObS)
.1*7
(
. 735)
.357
I
.588)
.*8b
(
.8110)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FL'JW
MULTIPLIED FUR
NULTIPlIE" FOR
MULTlPLlEH For
20 X 211 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
u.noo ( o.iio)
n.naa
n.ooou (u.oooo)
11.(1(100 (U.OOOO)
ii.no ( o.o)
-------
TABLE B-12B (CONT'D). TEST 13-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.F 3bfl
Engine model -n foro 3bO
ENGINE S.S L(3bO CID) V-8
CVS NO. <1
BAROMETER 7*S.2* mm HG(29.3* in HG)
DRY BULK TEMP. 28.3 0E6 C(83.0 0E6 F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM, M20(IN, H20)
BLOMER IML6T P MM, Hay(IN. HJO)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TINE SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* STO. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METF.R/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD MEIER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PCT
C02 hckgro meter/range/pct
w NOX sample MEIEr/RAnGE/PPM
i NOX BCK6RD MEIER/RANGE/PPM
»-»
DILUTION FACTOR
HC concentraiion PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO; CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS grams
CO MASS GRAhS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
HSHC 6/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/Kw HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/Kfc HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HK)
TOTAL TEST «ES.*
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (13n.0)
8312
31b.0
210.* ( 7*33)
2*,0/ 3/ 2*0
2,1/ 3/ 21
•>5.5/ 3/ 2752
,5/ 3/ 11
70.9/ 3/ 1,28
3,8/ 3/ ,0b
*5,1/ 2/ 95
1,1/ 2/ 1
8.53
221
2b29
1.23
""•1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130.0)
71bO
272,0
182.8 ( b*S7)
13,0/ 3/ 1311
2,*/ 3/ 2*
31.7/ 3/ 7*3
,«/ 3/ 18
19,1/ 3/ .31
3.9/ 3/ ,0b
12.3/ 2/ 12
1.5/ 2/ 2
3*. 18
107
709
.25
10.8
13.2b 15,81 2b,88 11,25
1H.37 lbU.ll b**, 37 151,0*
83b,* 181b,0 *7**,5 831,3
3.99 11.01 *0,21 *,03
,33b ( .7*) «bb8 ( 1,*7) 1,8*2 I *.0b) ,3*8 ( .77)
,73 ( .98) l.b2 ( 2,18) 5,3b ( 7,19) ,7* ( ,94)
11,33)
5.93)
9*.87)
72b)
5.2*)
.b?.l)
19.19 ( 13.5b)
lb3,70 ( 122,07)
11*7,10 (
5,*8 (
.*bl (
855.39)
*,08)
.758)
9,7* ( 7,2b)
98.bl ( 73,53)
1118,*b ( 83*.03)
b.83 ( 5.09)
.*11 ( .b7b)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FlOH
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
20 X 2U FILTERS
SAMPI.E FLO"
5.02 I 3.7*)
120.22 ( 89.bS)
885.21 I bbO.lO)
7.52 I S.bl)
,3** I .SbS)
15.27 ( 11.39)
205.03 ( 152.B9)
1128.*9 ( 8*1.51)
5.*7 ( *.08)
.*73 ( .777)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0,00)
11,000
ii.oooo (o.oono)
11,0000 (U.00U0)
i).on ( o.o)
-------
TABLE B-13A. ENGINE 2 NINE-NODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9 IH30* — PROJECT U-S0**-001
1U Li 78 TEST 21 OUR MRS IH30* K= 1.07b HUM» It - X G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
g/hr
KT.
——MODAL G/KHHR
mode
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
) NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KH
i
I OLE
eetao
9.220
b.Sb
0
18.272
27b7
377
2820
0
.232
R
R
I
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
2880
2.000
13.22
573
15.519
7711
lb3
200*
102
.077
?.b*b
93.952
*.7bl
15.9
3
55 PCT
T
esbo
.saa
13.81
18*9
15.052
1088b
211
13**
*78
.117
*.58*
29.170
10.370
3*.*
*
as PCT
T
2000
1.9*0
13.*7
b77
I5.b39
7303
107
1830
113
.077
5.19*
.88.991
5.*93
15.3
S
HI PCT
T
lano
2.570
13.10
2S0
15.87b
5b?0
7*
185*
32
.057
8.39S
211.b85
3.b*2
b.S
b
25 PCT
T
1880
1.890
13.3^
7*b
15.*95
7257
101
1788
125
.077
*.985
88.bOO
fa.18b
15.1
7
111 PCT
T
an8o
3.080
12.^0
uso
lb.218
l7l*b
252
b5 77
*50
.113
3. *25
89.*95
b.llb
5*.8
8
as PCT
T
1880
2.000
13.*2
7b8
I5.b35
7121
98
18*0
125
.077
*.851
91.17*
b.193
15.1
*
C.T.
137b00
5.*5')
3.72
10
23.80b
2858
1757
1322
0
.1*3
R
R
K
0.0
tJJ
I
ft
to
1
IDLE
0.0
0
b.l
R
I
.093
R
boo
10.7
20.0
2b.b
0.0
8.S
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
17.0
.797
*.8
.071
.*85
2000
l*.l
2.1
b.3
8.3
7.5
3
55 PCT
T
*fc.l
121
2*.0
.521
10.*
.0b8
.317
2000
1* . 7
7.1
8.0
**.3
SB.3
30.9
*
25 PCT
T
20.b
5*
lb.1
.783
5.5
. .071
.*7b
2000
1*.0
l."»
5.7
5.5
7.8
7.2
S
in PCT
T
8.8
23
12.5
l.*27
3.b
.073
. 8bB
2000
13.8
1.0
* . 3
1.1
*.5
2.3
b
25 PCT
T
20.2
53
lb.O
.793
b.2
.071
.'82
20U0
1*.2
1.8
S.b
b.l
7.8
7.1
?
9n PCT
T
73.5
193
37.8
.51*
b.l
.075
.313
2000
13.*
b.S
30.2
32.0
27.0
37.9
8
25 PCT
T
an.2
53
15.7
.778
b.2
.071
.*73
2000
l'.O
1.7
5.7
b.l
7. b
7.1
9
C.T.
II.0
II
b.S
R
R
.137
R
2000
7.3
S7.3
7.7
.0
5.7
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
20.9
55
15.9
.759
S.b
.071
.*b2
2000
l».l
2.2
5.7
5.8
7.9
7.3
2
55 PCT
T
*b. 1
121
23.3
.50b
10.8
.0b8
.308
2ono
1* . 7
5.7
8.9
*7.0
22.1
30.b
3
25 PCT
T
20.b
5*
15.7
• 7b3
5.*
.071
.*b*
2000
l*.o
1.9
S.B
s.s
7.8
7.1
"~
10 PCT
T
8.8
23
12.1
1.381
3.0
.073
.8*0
2000
13. b
1.1
*.*
2.3
5
25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
15.9
. 7*b
5.2
.071
.*5*
2000
l*.l
1.9
5.8
5.5
7.9
7.*
b
9II i»CT
T
7*.b
19b
37.9
.508
5.5
.075
.309
20H0
13.*
b.S
30.7
29.7
27. b
38.1
7
25 PCT
T
20.9
55
15.b
.7*5
5.2
.072
.153
2000
l*.o
1.8
5.9
5.*
7.7
7.3
8
C.T.
U.O
tl
b.2
R
R
.1*1
R
2000
7.1
bO.b
7.1
.0
5.7
0.0
9
IDLE
0.0
0
S.«*
R
R
.099
R
b90
10.1
18.0
25.7
.1
8.8
0.0
1UM
—(COMPOSITE '
/ALUE FOR
CYCLE l)-«
2b. 8
151
9.7
SUM
— (COMPOSITE VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2>-
25.2
152
9.*
T<0 CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FIO
0. 35{
2b.8)
~ tl.bSt
25
.2) ¦
25
.77*
G/KH
HR
C
19.219
BS}
CO- NDIR
0.35(
* 150.8)
~ 0.bS(
IS I
.8) •
151
.*50
G/KN
HR
(112.93b
BS)
NOX-CL
0.3S(
*.7)
~ 0.bS(
9
.*) *
9
.S2b
B/KM
HR
(
7.103
BS)
HC ~
NOX *
35
.299
B/KM
HR
(
2b.323
BS)
SFC *
.*30
Kli/KM
HR
(
.708 BS)
1
25 PCT
T
2200
1.9BU
13.3*
70*
15.571
7212
lib
1852
117
.077
5.559
88.**7
S.Sb3
15.b
2
S5 PCT
T
2000
l.Ob'J
13. bb
1973
1*.9*8
105b*
lbl
151*
*98
.1*7
3.**»8
32.855
10.817
3*.*
9
25 PCT
T
2000
2.050
13.3*
b8*
I5.bl9
7121
10*
1888
111
.077
5.Qb9
91.818
S.*l«»
15.3
*
III PCT
T
2000
2. 770
12.97
211
I5.9b9
5*88
79
l"»23
2b
.057
8.97b
2H.573
b. 5
S
25 PCT
T
1920
2.030
13.3*
b77
15.589
7212
102
1897
112
.077
*.7b0
88.958
5.2*8
15.9
6
9ii PCT
T
2080
3.130
12.80
1081
lb.218
17191
252
b«09
*09
.113
3.381
91.227
S.*Bb
55.7
7
25 PCT
T
1920
2.120
13.3*
b77
I5.b80
707b
99
1933
109
.077
*.730
92.273
5.212
15. b
8
C.T.
l*33bO
S.3b0
3.71
12
2*.312
2812
I7b3
1252
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
«»
IDLE
21000
9.9bO
7.08
7
19.385
2b7b
32*
2777
0
.232
R
R
R
0.0
UNIT3 AS SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77 PROCEDURE SFC C*UC ———PERCENT OF TOTAL—
MODE 10 HP TQ FC B3FC B3N0X F/A KS/KN HR RPH A/F HC CO NOX FUEL POMER
-------
TABLE B-13B. ENGINE 2 NINE-RODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
llbl IH301 — PROJECT 11-5011-001 8A*a2«00
10 11 78 U33U PM TEST 23 OUR HRS K» 1.083 HUM" 1'.* G/KG
concentration
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
6/HR
NT.
——MODAL G/KHHR
HOOE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KH
1
I OLE
11120
9 .1110
b.bl
0
17.150
2722
335
2787
0
.232
R
R
I
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
23bo
2.U70
13.02
Sb8
15.351
7711
135
2011
103
.077
b.33b
18.111
1.808
15.1
3
SS PCT
T
2000
.810
13.51
1871
11.708
107S0
lbb
1311
112
.117
3. b12
28.75b
10.7bU
31.1
1
25 PCT
T
2000
1.810
13.22
711
15.338
7212
107
1715
120
.077
5.211
87.217
5.815
15.3
S
HI PCT
T
1800
2.570
12.85
23b
15.b2b
5b25
71
ism
31
.057
8.830
223.051
3.bib
b. 2
b
25 PCT
T
1800
1.8S0
13.22
b81
15.285
71b7
lb
17b2
115
.077
1.771
87.283
5.713
15.1
7
*0 PCT
T
20U0
3.0?0
12.bB
1105
15.171
171H
21b
bb?2
127
.113
3.312
81.850
5.75b
55.1
8
2S PCT
T
1800
2.030
13.22
b81
15.15b
bllO
12
1811
111
.077
1.181
81.511
5.101
15.3
1
C.T.
1337bO
S.2SU
3.5b
10
23.017
27b7
1707
1277
0
.113
R
R
R
0.0
1
es pct
T
2120
2.020
13.10
702
lS.3b2
7318
lib
1152
121
.077
5.330
81.121
5.5b2
lb. 2
2
55 PCT
T
l»8o
.B7tf
13.17
2020
11.551
lObSI
157
1287
532
.1*?
3.311
27.131
11.511
31.1
3
25 PCT
T
1720
2.U00
13.10
b?1
15.21b
7lb7
12
1813
111
.077
1.17U
12.050
5.5b2
15.3
1
10 PCT
T
1120
2. 7b0
12.73
211
15.701
5188
77
1118.
27
.057
8.711
222.315
3.02b
b.S
5
25 PCT
T
1800
1.120
13.22
701 '
15.315
7212
17
1823
120
.077
l.hlS
BS.bll
5.82b
15.3
b
-Ifl PCT
T
2000
3.120
12.b8
1100
lb.021
17282
217
b715
12b
.113
3.320
11.508
5.712
55.1
7
25 PCT
T
1800
2.03U
13.22
72b
15.15b
7212
lb
1H3
122
.077
1.580
11.3bO
5.Bib
15.b
8
C.T.
ISlSbO
5.200
3.11
12
21.b80
2812
1828
1117
0
.113
R
R
K
0.0
*
IDLE
20720
1.750
b.10
10
18.151
2b7b
32b
2780
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
to
I
UNITS AS
SPECIFIEO IN THE 1-08-77
procedure
8FC
CALC
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
B3FC
BSNOX
F/A
KG/KN HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
PONER
1
IDLE
0.0
0
b,0
R
I
.011
R
bOO
11.0
18.1
2)i.3
0.0
B.l
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
17.0
."7
1.8
.070
.185
2000
11.2
2.5
b.b
s.o
B.l
7.5
3
55 PCT
T
15.7
120
23.7
.511
10.8
.Ob7
.315
2000
. 15.0
S.I
7.1
lb.0
22.2
30. b
1
25 PCT
T
20.b
51
15.1
.773
5.8
.070
.170
2000
11.3
2.0
S.b
5.1
7.8
7.2
5
10 PCT
T
8.1
22
12. »
1.180
3.b
.072
.100
2000
11.0
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.S
2.2
b
25 PCT
T
20.2
S3
15.8
.783
5.7
.070
.17b
2000
11.3
1.8
S.S
5.7
7.8
7.1
7
10 PCT
T
71.3
US
37.1
.510
S.8
.071
.310
2000
13. b
b.S
30.b
30.8
27.3
38.2
8
25 PCT
T
20.b
51
15.3
.711
5.1
.071
.153
2000
11.2
1.7
5.8
S.S
7. S
7.2
1
C.T.
0.0
n
b.l
R
R
.132
R
2000
7.b
51.3
7.1
.0
5 . b
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
21.7
57
lb.2
.71b
5.b
.070
.151
2000
11.2
2.1
b.l
S.b
8.0
7. b
2
55 PCT
T
Ifc.l
121
23.5
.510
11.5
.Obb
.310
2000
15.1
5.1
7.7
17.5
22.1
30.b
3
25 PCT
T
20.-b
51
15.8
. 7b8
S.b
.070
.1b7
2000
1*.3
1.7
5.1
S.3
7.8
7.2
1
10 PCT
T
8.8
23
12.1
1.381
3.0
.072
.810
2000
13.1
1.0
1.5
.1
1.1
2.3
5
25 PCT
T
20.b
51
1S.1
.773
5.8
.070
.170
2000
11.3
1.8
5.7
S.b
7.8
7.2
b
10 PCT
T-
71.3
US
38.1
.S13
5.7
.071
.312
2000
13.b
b.b
31.1
21.2
27.b
37.1
7
25 PCT
T
20.1
55
15.1
.751
5.8
.071
• 1b2
2000
11.2
1.7
b.O
S.7
7.8
7.3
8
C.T.
0.0
0
b . 2
R
R
.115
R
2000
b.l
bl.B
b.l
.0
S.7
0.0
1
IOLE
0.0
0
5.1
R
R
.017
R
bSO
10.3
17.1
2b.1
.1
8.8
0.0
SUM
—(COMPOSITE
value for
CYCLE 1)~
25.1
ISO
l.b
SUM
—(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)—
1
1
1
1
1
•
1
a
i
i
a
I
a
a
25.7
ISO
10.0
TrfO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0.35(
25.1)
+ 0.bS(
25
.7) «
25.172
6/KM
HR (
18.115
BS)
CO- NOIR
0.3SC
1SU.3)
+ O.bSt
1*1
.7) ¦
111.885
G/KH
HR (111.7b1
BS)
NOX-CL
0.35(
l.b)
+ 0.b5(
10
.0) *
1.852
G/KW
HR (
7.317
BS)
HC ~
NOX 3
35.321
G/KH
HR (
2b.311
BS)
SFC ¦
.131
KG/KM
HR (
. 7U1
BS)
-------
TABLE B-14A. ENGINE 3 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9
IH3*5
PROJECT 11-
50**-001
B/4/T=ar.3L3
10 30 78
1210 PM
TEST ai
K= .
8bb HUMS b.2
G/KG
concentration
*8 MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CAI.CULATEO
G/HR
WT.
-—-modal G/KWHR-
MODE
HC-FID
CO
cn?
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1 idle
1(1200
3.830
8.73
10
13.b91
172*
1*2
97*
0
.232
R
R
R
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
2300
l.b80
13.*2
120*
15.3b3
9525
lb3
210*
215
.077
b.785
87.708
8.9*9
17.9
3 55 PCT
T
2ino
1.350
13. b*
2213
X5.23n
13bn8
21*
2*37
5b9
.1*7
*.018
*5.703
lO.bbb
39. 8
* as PCT
T
2050
l.bOO
13.47
1323
15.30*
893b
137
1887
222
.077
5.520
7b.239
8.975
18.5
5 10 PCT
T
2000
1.130
13.55
578
1*.90B
b80*
10*
10*2
7b
.057
9.75*
97.703
7.115
8 . 0
(. 25 PCT
T
19*0
1.S70
13 . * 7
1302
15.2b1
8890
129
18*7
218
.077
5.37b
77.007
9.092
17.9
7 •'(I PCT
T
lbOO
1.710
13.51
20b*
15.*83
l9b*l
232
*382
753
.113
2 . b8*
50 • b89
8.710
b* . 5
0 25 PCT
T
1*30
1.570
13. * 7
13**
15.260
8800
127
1829
223
.077
5.05*
72.7b2
8. 8fe8
18. 7
9 C.T.
38*00
3.090
7.10
15
15.203
172*
*78
708
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
1
25 PCT T
2150
1.520
13.*7
1279
15.235
88*5
1*2
1783
21*
.077
5.93b
7*.302
8.901
17.9
2
55 PCT T
203P
1.270
13.bb
2311
15.1b2
13290
203
22*9
583
.1*7
3.809
*2.180
10.927
39.8
3
25 PCT T
1850
l.SfeO
13.*7
128*
15.2*1
BB*5
123
1829
21*
.077
* .950
73.882
8.b5?
18.S
*
10 PCT T
1900
1.100
13.59
535
1 *.90 7
b80*
99
101*
70
.057
9 . ?b8
95.118
b . 58b
8.0
S
2S PCT T
1920
1.510
13.*7
1258
15.199
870''
12b
17*8
207
.077
5.232
72.851
B.b*l
1?. ^
b
9o PCT T
lbSO
1.770
13.5*
2070
15.*99
1950*
237
*500
7*9
.113
2. 7*b
52.052
B.bbb
b* . 5
7
25 PCT T
1880
l.bno
13.*7
131b
15.285
875*
123
1851
217
.077
*.890
73.b53
8 . b2*
IB.7
8
C.T.
28800
2.850
8.b7
18
l*.b98
172*
373
b75
1
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
9
IDLE
8900
*.3*0
9.77
12
15.108
1588
105
921
0
.232
R
R
R
0.0
UNITS
AS SPECIFIED IN
THE 9-08
-77 PROCEDURE
SFC
C*LC
total-
.....
MODE ID
HP
TQ
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW
HR RPH
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
fuel
power
I
IDLE
0.0
0
3.8
R
R
. 0b5
R
*00
15.*
15.9
12.3
.0
5.0
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
2* . 0
b3
21.0
.875
8.9
.070
.532
2000
1*. 3
b.O
8.9
b.9
-------
TABLE B-14B. ENGINE 3 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9
IH3H5 —
— PROJECT
ll-50**-001
SARs
XVM-5
10 31 78
TEST a?
K« .
933 HUM" 8,3
G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
NT,
•••••MODAL G/KWHR-----
MODE
hc-fid
CO
coa
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KN
1 IDLE
sua
I. 110
11.79
50
13.*7*
3130
133
521
*
.232
R
R
R
0,0
2 05 PCT
T
aoo*
l.*bO
13.33
ia*a
15.018
9399
1*1
18?b
238
,077
5,805
7*,9a2
9,773
IB,2
3 55 PCT
T
n?*
1 .?10
13.57
asu
15,000
13517
198
2203
b*5
.1*'
3,711
*1,315
12.100
39,8
* as PCT
T
17*0
l.**0
13.**
1300
15,079
88*5
lib
170b
23b
,077
*.705
b8,93*
9.5*3
IB,5
5 10 PCT
T
lbBO
.890
13.*0
508
1*.*81
b80*
90
0*5
7*
.057
8. *20
79,aao
b, 93*
B , 0
b 25 PCT
T
lbBO
1. ?no
is.aa
ia53
1 *. 711
875*
11*
15b3
231
,077
* , bb9
b*,119
9 . * 7b
18,2
7 90 PCT
T
158*
1.5*0
13.57
PI 13
15.291
1950*
231
39bB
B35
.113
2,b83
*b,10b
9,700
b*. 2
8 as PCT
T
lfeOB
1 .*10
13.**
ia*a
15.033
BblB
105
lb33
221
,077
*,2*9
b5.9b5
8.910
18,5
9 C.T.
i"aoo
a.aao
8,97
18
13,309
lb78
2b?
5b5
1
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
i as pct
T
17B0
1.130
13.3*
1183
1 *,8 73
8709
119
1573
215
,077
* ,'51
b5,57*
B, 9**
17.9
a 55 PCT
T
lflaR
1 ,?30
13.*7
?351
1*,908
1315*
18*
2192
b*3
.1*7
3,**9
*1,120
12.052
39,8
3 as PCT
T
lt.no
1.1*0
is.aa
iao7
l*.7*a
8bl8
10b
1588
219
,077
*,a37
b2,9b0
B,b9b
IB,7
* 10 PCT
T
lboo
.930
13.2?
503
1*.332
b80*
8b
892
7*
,057
7,813
80,759
b,b98
8,2
5 as PCT
T
17ao
l.*10
13.**
ia3o
I5,0*b
8573
112
lb23
217
,077
* ,bbl
b7,b*3
9,0*8
17.9
b 90 PCT
T
if.no
1 . b'O
13.S7
ia3o
I5,*a3
19078
229
*217
* 7b
.113
a,b*b
*8,778
5,509
b* , 5
7 as PCT
T
1588
1 .*30
13.*7
ia77
15,081
8528
102
lb33
22*
,077
*,1*0
bS,9B7
9,03b
18,5
8 C.T.
aa»no
a.isn
8.07
15
13.*89
lb33
299
sab
1
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
IDLE
158*0
a.850
9.80
la
l*.*lb
15*2
189
bib
0
.232
R
R
R
0,0
m
¦UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN
THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE—
SFC
CALC
OF
TOTAL-
MODE ID
HP
TQ
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
kg/kw HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
n,n
0
b.9
R
R
,0b2
R
900
lb.2
18, b
7.8
.3
8,8
0,0
a as PCT T
a*.*
b*
20.5
.8*1
9.8
, ObB
.512
2000
1* . b
b.b
9.1
b . 9
8 , b
7.3
3 55 PCT T
53.9
1*0
29.8
.559
12.1
,0b8
.3*0
2000
19.7
17,5
21.0
35.7
2* ,0
30,5
* as PCT T
2*,B
b5
19.5
.788
9.5
,0b9
.*79
2000
I* , b
5.*
8,5
b,8
8.2
7.*
5 10 PCT T
10.7
28
15.0
1. *07
b . 9
.Obb
;B5b
2000
15.2
3.1
3.1
l.b
*.7
2.»
b 25 PCT T
3*.*
b*
n.3
.792
',5
,0b7
,*82
2000
19.9
S.3
7,8
b.7
8.1
7.3
7 90 PCT T
9b. i
?2b
*3.0
.500
9.7
.070
.30*
2000
1*.*
15,7
29,1
35,5
2b.b
37,8
B 25 PCT T
2* .8
b5
19,0
, 7b8
8.9
a ObB
,*b7
2000
l*,b
8.2
b.*
8,0
7.*
9 C.T.
o.n
n
3.7
R
R
,0b3
R
2000
15.B
23,0
5.3
.0
2.9
0,0
1
25 PCT T
a*.n
b3
19.2
.800
8.9
.ObB
.*87
2000
1*.8
5.1
7.8
7.5
8.7
7,2
2
55 PCT T
53.3
1*0
29.0
.5**
ia.i
a ObB
.331
2000
1 * » 8
IS,a
ao.b
*2.9
25,0
30,*
3
25 PCT T
25.1
bb
19.0
.75b
8,7
.Ob?
a *b 0
2000
19.9
9.h
7.8
?.?
8 « b
7,5
*
10 PCT T
11 .n
39
15.0
1.358
b.7
a ObS
,eab
2000
15.*
2.8
3.3
1.9
5,0
2.*
s
25 PCT T
a*.n
hi
18.9
. 7B8
9,0
, 0b8
.*79
2000
19, b
*.8
8.0
7,b
8.5
7.2
b
90 PCT T
flb.W
a?7
*2.5
.«2
5.5
.070
.399
2000
19,3
1* • 5
30,5
2*.5
28,1
37,9
7
as PCT T
a* ,b
feS
18.n
. 7bO
9.0
. 0b9
.*ba
2000
1 * , b
*,*
8.1
7.8
8.5
?.*
8
C.T,
o.n
n
3 . b
R
R
,0b*
R
2000
15, b
2*,0
9.8
.0
3.0
0.0
9
IDLE
n.o
0
3.*
R
R
. Ob 8
R
*80
1*.?
2*, b
9.a
.0
* . b
0.0
SUM
—(composite
VALUE FOP
CYCLE 1)-
•
•
•
a
t
I
•
•
a
a
a
a
a
a
8.7
80
13,8
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOP
CYCLE 2)«
1
1
•
•
•
1
I
1
1
I
•
1
I
•
i
a
a
a
a
a
a
m
a
a
a
a
a
•
a
a
•
a
a
9.3
81
11.9
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
m
HC- FID
0,35 (
8.7)
~ 0,bS(
9
.3) «
9,059
G/KW
HR (
b.755
BS)
CO- ndik
0, 35(
90.3)
~ 0,b5(
81
.a) »
80,898
G/KW
HR (
b0,38b
BS)
NOX-CL
0,35 (
13.8)
~ 0.bS{
11
HC ~
.*) »
NOX s
SFC »
12.283
21.3*a
.*13
G/KW
G/KW
KG/KW
HR (
HR <
HR <
9 .1 bO
15,915
, b 79
BS)
BS)
BS)
-------
TABLE B-15A. ENGINE 4 NINE-HODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
llbl IH30**2-- PROJECT U-SOM-OOl
11 80 78 TfST ¥3 IH30* K» ,<*22 HUM» 7,* C/KC
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
NT.
-—.-MODAL g/kwhr — —
MOOE
HC-FID
CO
CO?
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KH
1
IDLE
2*952
8.100
7.08
8
18,509
1905
3*3
lbd*
0
.232
R
R
R
0,0
2
2S PCT
T
2bR0
2.bl0
12. *2
753
15,83b
7802
151
2597
11*
.077
7,07*
121,7*7
5.32b
15.*
3
55 PCT
T
23*2
1 .*30
13.32
2028
15,523
11*29
210
299b
*77
.1*7
*.*15
b2,**0
10.025
35.5
*
85 PCT
T
2*32
2.b70
12.10
877
15,8*B
7*8*
131
25*7
127
,077
b, 2 71
121.bO*
b .055
15,b
S
10 PCT
T
21**
2. b 30
12.10
3*b.
15.775
5**3
BS
1833
37
,057
*,25*
200,Sb*
*.000
b , 8
it
25 PCT
T
23b8
2.750
12.10
Bl*
15.121
73*8
125
25b*
115
,077
5,970
122.*13
5.*92
15,b
7
*0 PCT
T
2200
3.700
12.5b
110b
lb.512
18280
871
827*
375
.113
3,721
110.2*3
*.**7
55,*
a
25 PCT
T
2512
8.*80
12.78
B3b
lb,0*7
739*
132
2773
11B
,077
b,101
127,772
5.*33
lb . i
*
C • T t
23***0
3.820
2.28
*
30,810
22b8
1819
5b?
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
l
25 PCT
T
3**8
2.950
12.7b
811
lb.10*
73*8
180
2719
113
.077
8,5*2
12*.820
5,*10
15.b
2
55 PCT
T
2MB
2.210
13.17
1*03
15,7b3
1 lb57
22*
3*21
*31
.1*7
*,783
73.03b
*,200
3*.*
3
25 PCT
T
2b*0
2.170
12.85
850
lb,122
73*8
138
273*
11*
.077
b, * 5*
12B.221
5 , 5b3
15.*
*
10 PCT
T
19b8
2.150
13.22
*00
15,595
52b2
7b
l*bS
*1
,057
7,bb*
1*7,**5
*.m
7.*
•
25 PCT
T
2*9(i
2.8b0
12.85
83b
15,99b
7857
ISO
2b21
lib
,077
b. 301
127,*b*
5,b*8
15.3
b
*0 PCT
T
22*b
3,730
12.*1
11*8
lb.*83
18370
2*3
8397
3*2
.113
3.8**
110.258
5.1**
5b. B
>
25 PCT
T
2**0
2.100
12.85
905
lb.02*
7*39
130
271*
12*
,077
5,b72
118,98*
S,b2B
17,0
B
C.T.
233b00
3.750
2.10
lb
30.13*
2132
1718
53b
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
9
IDLE
3827?
*.*50
b.59
lb
20.289
1*08
39*
1792
0
.232
R
R
R
0.0
W
I
a» m
m m
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE *-08-77
PROCEDURE-—
3FC
CALC
MODE 10
MP
TO
FC
B3FC
B9N0X
f/k
K6/KM HR
RPM
a/r
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0,0
0
».2
R
R
.01*
tt
*80
10,7
17.7
1*. 2
.0
b.l
0,0
2 25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
17.2
.807
5.3
.073
."1
2000
13.8
2 . b
7.2
5,8
B.3
7,3
3 55 PCT
T
* 7, b
125
2b.3
.553
10.0
.071
,33b
2000
l*.l
b.l
lb,0
*b, *
2*.3
31,1
* 25 PCT
T
20.9
55
lb. 5
, 78B
b.l
,073
.*7*
2000
13.7
2.3
7.1
b.5
B.O
7,1
5 10 PCT
T
*.1
2"»
12.0
1,313
*.0
.072
.7**
2000
13,8
1.1
3.8
1.*
*.3
2,1
b 25 PCT
T
20.9
55
lb. 2
,773
5.5
.073
.*70
2000
13.7
2.1
7.2
5.1
7.B
7.2
7 *0 PCT
T
75. 0
1*7
*0.3
.537
5,0
,07b
.327
2000
13.1
7.0
33.1
28,0
28.7
37,b
8 85 PCT
T
21.7
57
lb.3
.751
5.*
,07*
.*57
2000
13.5
2.3
7.7
b.O
7.1
7.*
1 C.T.
O.p
0
5.0
R
R
.201
R
2000
5.0
58,0
2.1
.0
*.5
0,0
1 25 PCT
T
20.9
55
lb.2
.773
5.*
.07*
,*70
2000
13.5
3.1
7.3
5.1
B.O
7.1
2 55 PCT
T
*b,B
123
25.7
.5*1
1.2
,072
.33*
2000
13,1
7.3
17, b
*3,1
«».!
30,*
3 25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
lb.2
,7b0
S.b
,07*
,*b2
2000
13.5
2.3
?.*
b.2
B.O
7.2
* in PCT
T
1.1
2b
11. b
1,172
~,2
.071
,713
2000
1*.0
1.0
2.1
l.b
"».2
2.5
5 25 PCT
T
20.b
5*
lb.0
,778
S.b
.07*
.*73
2000
13.b
2.2
7.1
b.l
7.1
7.0
b 10 PCT
T
7b.2
200
*0.5
.532
5.1
,07b
.323
2000
13.1
7.3
33.2
30,1
81.2
38,0
7 25 PCT
T
22.8
bO
lb,* "
.718
S.b
,07*
.*37
2000
13.b
2.2
7,3
b , 7
B.l
7.8
8 C.T,
o.n
0
*.?
R
R
.lib
R
2000
5.1
5*.2
2.7
.0
*.3
0,0
* IDLE
0.0
0
*.2
R
R
.10b
R
500
1.5
20.*
1* . 5
.1
b.2
0.0
SUM
—(COMPOSITE '
VALUE FOR
CVCLE 1)-
2b.7
lb*
1.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE '
l/ALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
1
t
2b,8
lbl
8.7
TWO CVCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0. 35(
2b.7)
~ 0.b5(
2b
,8) ¦
2b,773
G/KM
HR (
11.1b5
BS)
CO- NDIR
0.35C
lb*.2)
~ 0.b5(
lbl
.2) ¦
lb7,*bb
G/KW
HR (12*.871
BS)
NOX-CL
0.35(
1.0)
* o.bse
8
.7) ¦
8,718
G/KK
HR {
b.SbO
BS)
HC ~
NOX a
35,571
G/K W
HR (
2b.525
BS)
SFC ¦
.*23
KG/KN
HR (
.bib
BS)
-------
TABLE B-15B. ENGINE 4. NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9
IH30*«2-
- PROJECT
11-50**-001
3X1 IS
11 81 78
TEST *5
IH30*
K« ,
915 HUM« 7,7
G/KG
CONCENTRATION
*3 MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
calculated
O/HR
WT.
.....modal G/KWHR-- —
MODE
HC-FID
, CO
C02
nox-cl
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1 IDLE
3* 30*
8. ObO
b.95
0
18.81b
17b9
358
1531
0
.232
R
R
I
0,0
2 25 PCT
T
2.950
12.73
bb*
lb.017
7711
lb2
28b*
98
.077
7,73b
13b,978
* , b71
lS.b
3 55 PCT
T
2**8
2.110
13.10
18*8
15.*90
11703
211
3220
*23
.1*7
*, * 3b
b 7.b50
8,880
35.5
* 25 PCT
T
**72
2.8*0
12.73
80S
15.852
7*39
133
2b92
115
.077
b,10b
12*.023
S , 28b
lb,2
5 10 PCT
T
2lbO
2.230
13.10
33b
15.577
5398
8b
15bl
35
.057
8,b37
157.b57
3,572
7,*
b 25 PCT
T
8b*0
2.870
12.73
790
15.902
739»
1*0
2b9b
112
.077
'b,577
12b.*01
5.232
15.9
7 90 PCT
T
2*00
3,700
12, * *
111b
lb,*15
18280
30b
8323
377
,113
3,997
108,7*0
*,932
57,1
§ 25 PCT
T
2bb*
2.850
12.73
850
15*88*
7303
1*0
2b*7
119
.077
b , 5b£
12*.Ill
5 , 5bb
15,9
* C.T.
31*880.
3.220
1.81
b
37.589
22b8
19b*
392
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1 2S PCT
T
398*
2,920
12.bg
731,
lb.055
739*
210
27ib
103
.077
10,008
129,b90
*,915
15,b
8 55 PCT
T
£930
2.2*0
12.97
1871
15.5*3
11703
8S1
3*07
*28
.1*7
5,229
71.001
8,917
35,8
3 25 PCT
T
282*
2.950
12. bl
79b
15.882
73*8
1*9
2757
112
.077
7,12*
131.b3*
5,3*1
lS.b
* 10 PCT
T
238*
2,5b0
12.85
323
I5,b82
5352
93
17b5
33
,057
9, 7bl
185,390
3,817
7.1
S 25 PCT
T
2b«0
2 .8*0
12. bb
8*S
15,80b '
7*8*
1*5
27lb
121
,077
b , 91B
129,b97
5, 789
15,b
b 10 PCT
T
2*00
3 . 3b0
12.bl
130*
lb,2*5
181**
307
7581
**2
.113
*,027
99,53*
5,808
5b,8
7 25 PCT
T
2$?8
2,bio
12.73
919
15,709
7257
133
2510
129
,077
b , 1* 3
115,b57
5,9*1
lb,2
« C.T,
Hl3b0
*,blO
3.02
18
27,782
2?b8
lb*5
7bO
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
* IDLE
IbQlb
9.bB0
b.Sb
12
80,2*8
2138
*28
2059
0
,232
R
R
R
0,0
-
• ••
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE—
SFC
CALC
• •••
MODE ID
HP
TQ
pc
BSFC
8SN0X
F/A
KG/KM hr
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0,n
0
3.9
R
I
,09b
R
*70
10,*
17.3
12.1
0,0
5.8
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
20,9
55
17.0
.812
*.7
,07*
,*9*
2000
13,b
2 . b
8.0
5,3
8.3
7,1
3 55 PCT
T
* ', b
125
25.8
.5*2
8.9
,071
,330
2000
l*.l
b.S
17.2
**,1
2*. 1
30,7
* 25 PCT
T
*1.7
67
lb.*
.75b
i.3
,073
, *bO
2000
13.7
2.1
7.5
b , 3
8.0
7.3
S 10 PCT
T
1.9
2b
11.1
1.202
3.b
,071
.731
2000
1*.0
1.0
3.2
1.*
*.3
2.1
h 25 PCT
T
81.1
5b
lb,3
,7b*
5.2
,073
,*b§
2000
13.7
2.3
7.5
b.l
8.0
7.2
7 90 PCT
T
7b.5
801
*0.3
,52b
*.9
,07b
,320
2000
11.2
7.2
3* • 2
30,3
29.0
38.0
8 25 PCT
T
*1.3
5b
lb.]
. 75S
5 , b
,073
,*59
2000
11.7
2.3
7.*
b. 5
7.9
7.2
1 C.T,
0,0
0
5,0
R
R
.27*
R
2000
3.7
58,7
2,0
.0
* . b
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
20,4
55
lb. 3
,778
*.9
,07*
.*73
2000
13.5
3,5
7.3
5.3
7.9
7.1
2 55 PCT
T
*8.0
12b
25,8
.538
8.9
,071
.327
2000
1* . 0
8.0
17,5
*1.7
2*. 0
31.1
3 25 PCT
T
80,9
55
lb.*
,773
5.3
,073
,*70
2000
13.7
2.5
7.*
5.7
7.9
7.1
* 10 PCT
T
1.5
25
11,8
1,239
3.5
,072
.75*
2000
13.9
1.2
3,5
1.3
*.3
2 . *
5 25 PCT
T
20,9
55
lb.5
,788
5,8
,073
.*79
2000
13,8
2.*
7.3
b.2
8.0
7.1
b 90 PCT
T
7b,?
200
*0,0
.525
5,8
,075
2000
13.3
7 , b
29,9
33,2
28,b
37.9
7 25 PCT
T
21.7
57
lb.O
.737
5,9
,072
.**8
2000
13,9
2.2
b , 7
b.b
7,8
7.*
8 C.T,
0.0
0
5.0
R
R
.171
R
2000
5,8
51,2
3.8
.0 .
*.s
0.0
9 IDLE
n,n
0
*.7
R
R
,105
R
*50
9,5
21.3
lb,7
.1
b , 9
0.0
SUM
...(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1)-
•
1
I
•
•
I
•
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
I
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
28,2
lb2
8.3
SUM
—.(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
i
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
•
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
27,1
1 b 9
8,9
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
m
HC- FID
0, 35 (
28,2)
~ 0,b5(
27
.i) ¦
27.*81
G/KW
HR (
20.*93
BS)
CO- NDIR
0, 35 (
lb2.1)
~ 0,b5(
lbl
.*) ¦
1bb,B!1
G/KW
HR (12*,398
BS)
NOX-CL
0, 35 (
8.3)
~ 0,b5(
8
,i) ¦
S.bBB
G/KW
HR (
b , * 79
BS)
HC ~
NOX »
3b.Ib9
G/KW
HR (
2b,972
BS)
SFC ¦
.*22
KG/KW
HR (
, b9 3
BS)
-------
TABLE B-16A. ENGINE 5 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
14b4 CHEV 3bb — PROJECT 11-50M-0 WHtjr.e*
12 78 33b Pm TEST 63 CHEV 3bb K» ,97b HUM« 4,8 G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
S/HR
WT.
• ••••MODAL G/KWHR»»»--
MODE
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FIO
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
IDLE
12932
*.b*0
4.40
21
15.48*
181*
lb*
10b*
1
.238
R
R
R
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
*lbO
3.7*0
12 , *4
331
lb.*77
108*1
lb)
*470
71
,077
b, SB?
14* ,812
2 , 7b5
14,0
3
5S PCT
T
eob*
3 .550
12.73
83b
lb.517
1 b 1 0 3
231
b441
2b*
.1*7
*.0*1
122,342
* , b23
*2,b
»
25 PCT
T
1B80
3 .*bO
12.80
*11
1b,* 7b
10*33
137
**2b
8*
,077
5.352
173, *b0
3,305
l*,0
S
10 PCT
T
13b0
2.010
13.bb
2*0
15,8*b
7711
7b
1445
*b
,057
7.120
187,1*5
*,288
8,0
b
25 PCT
T
n*»
3.7*0
12.*4
38b
lb.*53
10b54
1»*
*845
81
.077
5, *13
183, bl8
3,034
14,4
7
*0 PCT
T
2l7b
*.310
12.25
787
lb.80*
22b80
337
117*7
3**
.113
3 , b 3B
12b,4*0
3.718
b4 , 0
•
25 PCT
T
2000
*.030
12.37
38b
lb,b24
10750
1*8
52b3
81
,077
5,55*
147,*22
3,033
14,4
*
C.TJ
80000
*.200
b . 73
12
14,bb5
2* 4f
1108
107b
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
25 PCT
T
2*80
*.800
11,74
300
lb,87*
1088b
183
b255
b3
.077
b , 8 70
2 3*,bb7
2.352
14.4
t
55 PCT
T
2000
3 . bOO
12.bl
83b
lb.*34
1587b
221
7023
2b2
.1*7
3,875
122,4*5
* , $74
* 2 , b
3
25 PCT
T
as**
5.230
11.b7
2b3
I7.1b4
11113
17*
b8S8
55
,077
b.521
25b,53b
2,0b4
!*.¦»
*
10 PCT
T
lfbO
3.*40
12. bl
204
lb.302
78*7
47
334*
33
,057
8.*45
247,051
2.853
8,5
S
25 PCT
T
2120
*.750
11.74
310
lb. 783
1088b
157
b22*
bS
,077
5,40*
233,*85
2.***
14,4
b
40 PCT
T
2120
*.*10
12.18
728
lb.833
2222b
321
117b2
310
.113
3,*b8
127,110
3.351
b4 , 0
7
25 PCT
T
2*00
5.100
11.b5
271
17,025
10745
17*
b5S3
5b
.077
b,53b
2*5,Ob*
2.084
14,4
a
C.T.
8*800
*.100
b.5b
12
1*.*01
2*45
1158
1098
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
q
IDLE
2*800
5.bl0
4,38
2*
17,780
172*
270
1044
1
.232
R
R
R
0,0
W
I
•
• ••
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 4-08-77
PROCEDURE —
SFC
CALC
OF TOTAL—
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
B3N0X
F/A
K6/KW HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0.0
0
*.0
R
R
,07b
R
*70
13,1
11.'
S.b
,2
¦*.5
0,0
2 25 PCT
T
#5.4
b7
23.*
.437
2.8
,07b
.570
2000
13.1
3.4
8,7
5,2
8,8
7.1
3 55 PCT
T
57.i
150
35.1
,b21
*.b
.07b
.378
2000
13,1
10,7
23,5
37,0
25,1
30,5
* 25 PCT
T
25.*
b7
23.0
,*01
3.3
.07b
.5*8
2000
13.2
3,3
7,8
b , 2
8,5
7,1
S 10 PCT
T
10.7
28
17.0
1.54*
*.3
.072
.470
2000
13.4
1.*
2.b
2.5
*.7
2.2
b 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
23.S
,882
3.0
,07b
.53b
2000
13.1
3.5
8,fa
5,*
8,7
7.5
7 40 PCT
T
*2.5
2*3
50.0
.5*0
3.7
,078
• 32*
2000
12,8
11.*
30,3
37,0
27,2
38,0
8 2S PCT
T
2b.*
70
23.7
.884
3.0
,077
.5*1
2000
13.0
3 , b
*.3
5.*
8,8
7,5
* C.T,
0.0
0
5.5
R
R
,102
R
2000
4,8
*4.8
3.5
,1
3.8
0,0
1 25 PCT
T
2b. i
70
2* .0
.400
2.*
.074
.5*8
2000
12.7
* . 0
*.7
5,1
8,*
7,*
2 55 PCT
T
*7,i
150
35.0
.t>13
*.b
,07b
.373
2000
13.2
4. 1
20,4
*0,4
2*.8
30,3
3 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
2*.5
.414
2.1
.080
.S51
2000
12.*
3.8
10, b
*.5
*.1
7.*
* 10 PCT
T
)1.*
30
17.3
1,51*
2 . *
,075
.'21
2000
13.3
l.b
3,4
2.0
*.8
2,3
5 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
2* . 0
.400
2.»
.078
.5*8
2000
12.8
3.*
*.7
5.3
8.4
7,*
b 40 PCT
T
12.S
2*3
**.0
.530
3.*
.078
.322
2000
12.8
10.2
2b, 4
37.3
2b.7
37,7
7 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
23.8
.843
2.1
,080
.5*3
2000
12.5
3.8
10,2
*,b
8,8
7,*
8 C.T,
0.0
0
5.5
R
R
,10*
R
2000
4 . b
*b.b
3,0
.1
3,8
0,0
* IDLE
o.n
0
3.8
R
R
.087
R
500
11.5
17,b
5.2
.2
*.2
0,0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE l)-«
•
1
•
1
•
1
•
1
•
1
9
9
9
9
C
i 9
i 9
\ 9
15,5
213
S.l
SUM
—(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
•
9
•
1
1
•
1
9
•
9
9
9
9
9
9
mm
17.2
234
*.5
TWO CYCLE
composite
m
HC- FID
0. 35(
15.5)
~ 0,b5(
17
.2) ¦
lb
. b? 3
G/KW
HR
(
12.34b
B9)
CO- NDIR
0.35C
213.*)
~ 0,bS(
234
.5) ¦
230
.32*
G/KW
HR
(171.75b
BS)
NOX-CL
0.35(
5.1)
~ 0,b5(
*
,5) «
*
,7*7
G/KW
HR
(
3,5*0
03)
HC ~
NOX *
21
.370
G/KW
HR
(
15.43b
BS)
SFC »
.*57
KG/KW
HR
(
.751
BS)
-------
TABLE B-16B. ENGINE 5 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9 CHEV 3bb « PROJECT ll-50**-0
12 ?0 78 11? PM TEST 5* *¦ .979 MUM* 9.9 G/KG
CONCENTRATION
as MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
C/HR
WT,
.---.modal g/kwhr--—
mode
HC-FID
CO
CO?
NOX-CL
carbon
g/hr
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
IDLE
9888
5.580
9,b9
2*
lb.38b
22bB
15*
ISbO
1
.232
R
R
R
0,0
2
25 PCT
T
>000
3.870
12.37
295
lb.*b9
10*33
1*5
*9B2
bl
,077
5 , b05
1*1.237
2,3*7
19.3
3
55 PCT
T
?0'0
3.blO
12.bl
803
lb, *58
lb*20
238
7275
2b 1
.1*7
*.083
12*, 8b7
*.*71
*3,»
*
25 PCT
T
eooo
3,930
12.*9
333
lb,b*9
1020b
1*1
*Bbb
bb
.077
5, * 31
187,923
2 ,Sb3
19,3
5
10 PCT
T
I5b0
2.580
13.22
230
15.979
7802
87
25*5
37
.057
7, lfeb
208,81b
2.997
9,1
b
2* P(Jt
T
2000
3.990
12.37
322
lb.5B9
10297
1*2
5003
bS
.077
5.*95
113,18b
2.510
19,3
7
90 PCT
T
• 2l8*
*.*70
12.1*
750
Ib.BbO
23133
3**
12389
335
.us
3, <>53
131,712
3.SS8
70,1
8
25 PCT
T
202*
*. 0"0
12.37
3*2
lb.bB?
10795
ISO
5333
72
.077
5,800
205,9b3
2,779
19,3
9
C.T,
98SbO
*. 200
b.Ob
10
20,95b
2b31
13*3
10b5
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
2S PCT
T
258*
H. 390
12.02
29q
lb.70b
10523
18b
55Bb
bl
.077
7,197
215,71B
2 , 3b5
H.3
2
55 PCT
T
213b
3.b*0
12. bl
85?
lb.*9S
lb239
2*1
72S9
273
.1*7
*,111
12 3,* 31
*,b51
*3,7
3
25 PCT
T
221b
1.510
12.02
287
lb,7B*
10523
159.
5712
59
,077
b, 058
217,388
2,227
19,t,
*
lt> PCT
T
l*bO
3. ObO
12.73
215
15,991
7817
99
3033
3*
,057
7 , 8bb
2*1,3b7
2,730
9.*
9
25 PCT
T
2120
* . 210
12.1*
309
lb.593
105b9
155
5*17
b*
,077
5,972
209,181
2,*72
19,3
b
*»0 PCT
T
2200
*.*30
12.02
7*8
lb,702
23133
3*9
1239*
337
.113
3,bb5
130,190
3,139
71,0
7
25 per T
22b*
* . 9*0
11.77
257
lb,9b9
10b59
lb3
b2bB
52
.077
b , 291
2*2,Obb
2,027
19,3
>
C.T.
793bO
*.bbO
b.*7
10
H.798
29*8
1290
1*02
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
9
IDLE
2*9b0
5.**0
10,**
20
18.713
lb33
2*7
959
1
,232
R
R
R
0,0
W
t
m
mmm
UNTTS AS
SPECIFIED IN tHE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE—
SFC
CALC
MODE 10
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
B8N0X
F/A
KG/KH HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 I0LE
a.n
0
5,0
R
R
,078
R
900
12,8
10,2
7.7
.3
5.5
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
2«. 0
b8
23.0
.888
2.3
,07b
,5*0
2000
13.1
3.2
8.1
*.7
8.*
7.2
1 55 PCT
T
is.3
153
3fc.2
.b21
*.5
,07b
.371
2000
13.2
10.0
22,8
38,7
25.2
30,7
* 25 PCT
T
*5.9
h8
22.5
,8b9
a.b
,077
,529
2000
13,0
3,1
8,0
5,2
. 8.2
7.2
S 10 PCT
T
12.2
32
17.2
i.*n
3,0
,073
,859
2000
13,7
1,*
3,1
2,1
* . b
2.5
b 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
22,7
,877
2,5
,077
,533
2000
13,0
3,1
8.2
5,1
8.3
7.2
7 90 PCT
T
*'.i
2*7
51,0
.5*2
a.b
,078
,330
2000
18,8
U.l
89,9
3B, 3
27.3
38,1
8 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
23,8
,919
2.8
,077
,559
2000
12.
3.3
8,8
5,b
8.7
7,2
* C,T,
0,n
0
5.8
«
R
,11?
R
2000
8,9
5*.7
3,3
.1
3.9
0,0
1 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
23.2
,89b
2.*
,076
,5*5
2000
12.t
3.8
B.9
*.B
8.5
7,1
2 55 PCT
T
98
15*
35.8
,blO
¦»,7
.07b
,371
2000
13,1
9,5
22,0
*0,7
25.1
30,7
3 25 PCT
T
2b.3
b 9
23,2
,883
2,2
.078
,537
2000
12,8
3,3
9.1
*,b
8.5
7,2
* 10 PCT
T
12. b
33
17.3
1,377
2.7
,07*
,B37
2000
13, b
1.5
3.b
2,0.
*.7
2.5
5 25 PCT
T
25,9
bB
23.1
,900
2,5
,077
.5*7
2000
13,0
3.2
a, b
5.0
8 , b
7.1
b 90 PCT
T
*5.2
250
51.0
.53b
3,5
,078
,32b
2000
12,9
10, b
29,0
38,b
27.5
38,3
7 25 PCT
T
25,9
b8
23.5
,907
2,0
,079
,552
2000
12, b
3.*
10,0
*.1
B.b
7.1
8 C.T,
0,0
0
b.S
R
R
,10*
R
2000
•».7
*9 , H
*.2
.1
*.*
0,0
9 IDLE
o.n
0
3.b
R
R
,091
R
11.0
15,*
*.b
.1
*.0
0.0
SUM
—(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1>-
lb,9
225
*,8
SUM
—(Composite
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2>-
17,8
231
*.7
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
•
He- FID
0 . 35 {
lb.9)
~ 0.b5(
17
.8) B
17,*99
G/KW
HR (
13.0*9
B3)
Co- NDIR
0 • 35 (
225,3)
+ 0.b5(
230
.5) «
22 B,b 7 7
G/KW
HR (170,525
BS)
NOX-CL
0 » 35 (
*,8)
~ 0.b5(
*
,7) -
*,721
G/KW
HR {
3.520
BS)
HC ~
NOX »
22,220
G/KW
HR (
lb,5b9
BS)
SFC *
,*5b
KG/KM
HR (
,750
BS)
-------
TABLE B-17A. ENGINE 9 NINE-NODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
19b9 CH3bb -- PROJECT U-50M-0 *AK= 2.9,39
03 lb 79 TEST 9? K« .855 HUM« 5,8 G/KC
CONCENTRATION
as measured
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
O/HR
WT.
.-—-modal c/kwhr---—
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
nox-cl
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KM
1
IDLE
i9b*8
*.330
7.35
10
13,839
2*95
389
1577
1
.23?
R
R
R
0,0
2
25 PCT
T
8880
*.750
11.10
IB*
lb,178
115b?
23*
bBbO
37
.077
10,985
321,fa9*
1.751
IS.9
3
55 PCT
T
258*
5.750
11.15
375
17.195
18325
315
12378
113
.1*7
5. 3b8
211.071
1,93*
*3,7
*
25 PCT
T
iqfao
3.900
12.02
315
lb.l**
ll*7b
159
5b00
fa*
.077
b , 05b
213,128
2 , * 19
H.b
S
10 PCT
T
10*0
1.510
13.22
2*0
1* . 8*9
8255
bfa
lb9b
38
.057
fa ,* 10
lb*.935
3, b83
7,7
fa
25 PCT
T
202*
*.*50
11.5b
271
lb. 2*1
11793
lb8
b527
5b
.077
fa.200
2*1.*23
2 . Obb
20,2
7
90 PCT
T
230*
5.070
11.bl
falO
lb.9**
2*9*8
388
15079
255
.113
3,997
155,287
2 . b25
72,*
8
25 PCT
T
IRRO
3.900
12.02
325
lb.135
1129*
150
5515
bS
.077
5.720
209,877
2,*57
19,b
9
C.T.
* 73b0
2.830
5.57
5
13.*87
2722
1027
115*
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
l
25 PCT
T
iqfaB
2.*90
12.73
*70
15.**5
1088b
158
35*5
9*
.077
5,937
132,999
3.527
19,9
2
55 PCT
T
2 37b
*.b*0
11. b7
570
lb.581
17fa90
290
9qq*
173
.1*7
5,00*
172,75*
2,982
*3,2
3
25 PCT
T
1720
2 . bfaO
12.bl
*55
I5.*bb
1088b
138
3782
91
.077
5,333
l*b ,053
3.510
19,3
*
10 PCT
T
9bO
1.290
13.22
250
l*.bl9
7983
bO
1*23
39
.057
fa , 2fa9
1*9,*b8
*,070
7,1
5
25 PCT
T
17fa0
1.120
12.25
*10
15.571
112*9
1*5
*553
8*
,077
5, *38
170,810
3,15*
19,9
fa
90 PCT
T
2320
5.510
11.**
535
17.21b
257b*
397
lbb57
227
.113
*,0bl
170,199
2.322
73,0
7
25 PCT
T
17**
3.1b0
12.3*
*00
lS.b99
1089b
138
**2b
79
.077
5,252
lb8,*57
2.99b
19, b
a
C.T.
512C10
2.750
b.Ofa
5
I*.332
2722
10*9
1055
0
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
IDLE
182*0
5.180
7.72
10
1*,918
2**9
331
1718
0
.832
R
R
R
0,0
•
m mm
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE—
SFC
CALC
OF TOTAL —
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
K6/KN HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0.0
0
5.5
R
R
,0b7
R
*30
1* . 9
23.*
b, 1
,2
5,5
0,0
2 25 PCT
T
21.3
5b
25.5
1.19b
1.8
,07b
,727
2000
11.2
*.7
8,7
*,*
8.5
5,9
3 55 PCT
T
58. fa
15*
*0.*
. bB9
1.9
,081
, * 19
2000
12.3
12.0
30,1
25,7
25, b
30,8
* 25 PCT
T
2fa.3
b9
25.3
.9b3
2.*
,075
,58b
2000
13.*
3.2
7,1
7,5
B,*
7,2
5 10 PCT
T
10.3
27
18.2
1.770
3.7
, Ob8
1.077
2000
1* « 8
1.0
l.b
3,3
*,5
2.1
b 2S PCT
T
27,0
71
2b.0
,9b2
8,1
,07b
.585
2000
13,2
3.3
8,3
b, b
8,b
7.*
7 90 PCT
T
97,1
255
55.0
,5bb
2.b
.079
.3*5
2000
12.b
u.*
28,2
**.*
2b,8
39.3
B 25 PCT
T
2b, 3
b9
2*.9
,9*8
2,5
,075
,57b
2000
13.*
3,0
7,0
7.7
8,3
7,2
9 C.T.
n.n
0
fa . 0
R
R
,0b7
R
2000
1* , 8
38,1
2.7
.1
3,7
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
2* . 0
.900
3.5
.071
,5*8
2000
l*.l
3.*
5,2
9.0
8,1
7.3
2 55 PCT
T
57.q
152
39.0
.b7*
3.0
.077
,*10
2000
12.9
11. 8
28,1
31,b
25,2
30.1
3 25 PCT
T
25.9
fa8
2*.0
.''27
3.5
.071
,5b*
2000
l*.l
2.9
5, b
B.7
8,1
7,1
* 10 PCT
T
9.9
25
17. fa
1,8*9
*.1
.Obb
1,125
2000
15.1
• ^
1.5
2«B
*.*
1.9
§ 25 PCT
T
2b.7
70
2*.8
.930
3.2
.072
. 5bb
2000
13,9
3.1
b, 7
8.1
8,»
7.3
fa 90 PCT
T
97,q
257
5b.8
.580
2.3
.OBI
.353
2000
12.*
12.*
35,9
32,0
28,3
39,2
7 25 PCT
T
2b,3
b9
2* . 0
.913
3.0
.072
.55b
2000
13.8
2.9
b.S
7 . b
8,1
7.2
8 C.l.
n,n
n
b . 0
R
R
,072
R
2000
13.9
*1.*
2.9
.0
3,8
0.0
9 IDLE
0,n
0
5.*
R
R
,073
R
*80
13,8
21,2
7,b
.1
5.5
0,0
SUM
— (Composite
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1)-
18.5
290
3.1
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
17.2
2*9
3.8
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
m
HC- FID
0.35(
18.5)
~ 0,b5(
17
.2) «
17
.bb5
G/KW
HR
(
13.172
BS)
CO- ndir
0.35(
289.7)
~ 0.bS(
2*8
.8) a
2b3
,118
G/KW
HR
(19b.207
BS)
NOX-CL
0, 35C
3.1)
~ O.bSt
3
.8) «
3
.5fa*
G/KW
HR
(
2.b58
BS)
HC ~
NOX s
21
.229
G/KW
HR
(
15.830
BS)
SFC ¦
,*95
KG/KW
HR
(
.813
BS)
-------
TABLE B-17B. ENGINE 9 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
I9b9 cHjbfc -- project n-so**-o
03 M 79 TEST 93 K* 1,003 HUM" 10,8 G/KG
CONCFNTRATION
A3 MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
WT.
••¦••MODAL G/KWHR-*—•—
MOOE
HC-FIO
cn
C02
nox-cl
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-F1D
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
IDLE
15552
3.970
7.53
10
13.210
2722
352
lb5?
1
,232
R
R
R
0,0
2
25 PCT
T
2**0
5.3bO
ia.88
lb9
lb.518
122*7
20b
8028
*2
,077
7 , 9 b 0
310,009
l.bll
19,3
3
55 PCT
T
?*R0
5. **0
11.33
393
17.05*
181**
302
1 lb91
139
,1*7
5,285
20*,b 7 3
2,*3b
*?.b
*
05 PCT
T
2280
5.310
11.21
187
lb,780
11703
182
7*80
*3
,077
7,01*
2 8 8,877
1 , b 7 b
19,3
s
10 PCT
T
mo
1. b?0
13.22
210
1*•972
7983
71
17*5
37
,057
7,*15
183,277
3,915
7.1
b
25 PCT
T
2032
•~.270
11.78
2*9
lb.282
1 l*7b
lb*
b079
57
,077
b , * 1 3
238,272
2,253
19,0
7
90 PCT
T
2*00
5.b50
11.**
* 7 3
I7.3b5
25855
*10
lb993
2 3*
.113
*,355
180,bbO
2,*92
70,1
S
25 PCT
T
1920
3.*70
12.25
300
15.939
1088b
150
*787
bB
,077
5,787
18*.872
2, b 3*
19.3
9
C.T.
*8nno
3,080
b . 7 3
10
15,030
3039
1055
1258
1
,1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
25 PCT
T
22?*
3.300
12.37
300
15.92*
11ObB
177
*b33
b9
,077
b , 8 2 3
178,91b
2, b 8 0
19,3
2
55 PCT
T
?*R0
5 . *00
U.**
*05
17,12*
I7b90
293
112b9
139
,1*7
5,13b
197,27b
2.*38
*2,b
3
25 PCT
T
?09b
*.100
11.93
2b?
lb,270
10977
lb2
5588
bO
,077
b , 2* 3
215,787
2,298
19,3
*
10 PCT
T
1 ?B0
1.820
13.10
198
lS.Obb
7893
77
192b
35
,057
8,039
202,298
3,b2b
7,1
5
25 PCT
T
2000
3.800
12.02
280
lb.0*8
110b8
158
529*
b*
,077
b.OBS
20*,*29
2, *82
19,3
b
10 PCT
T
2*00
5.590
11. Sb
*90
17.*15
2517*
398
lb293
23b
.113
* , 3 3 b
177,538
2 , 5 b 9
b 8 , *
7
25 PCT
T
2000
3.900
12.1*
300
lb,2b9
10795
152
5228
bb
,077
5,951
20*,891
2.S97
19,0
B
C.T,
S2*no
2.990
b , 7 3
12
15.*25
22bfl
839
888
1
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
IDLE
20 ISO
*.*70
8.09
15
1* i 793
1950
29*
1191
1
.232
R
R
R
0,0
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE----
SFC
CALC
• m mm
mode id
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
KQ/KW HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
n.n
0
b . 0
R
R
,0b*
R
*50
15.7
21.*
b
1
,2
5,9
0,0
2 25 PCT
T
25,9
bB
27.0
1,0*3
I.b
.078
.b3»
2000
12.9
*.2
9
8
8,8
7.2
3 55 PCT
T
5?.!
150
*0.0
.700
2.*
.080
,*2b
2000
12.5
11. b
27
1
31,2
25,0
30,5
* 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
25,8
,99b
1.7
.079
,bOb
2000
12.7
3.7
9
1
5,1
8,*
7,2
5 10 PCT
T
«*.«!
25
17,b
1,8*9
3.9
,0b8
1.125
2000
1*.7
1.1
1
b
3,2
*.3
2,0
b 25 PCT
T
25.5
S7
25,3
,992
2.3
,07b
,b03
2000
13.2
3.3
7
*
b , 8
8.3
7.1
7 90 PCT
T
9*.l
2*7
57,0
, bOb
2.5
.082
. 3fa9
2000
12.2
12.1
30
3
*0,*
27,*
38, b
8 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
2*, 0
2. b
.07*
.5b*
2000
13. b
3,0
5
8
8,0
7,9
7.2
9 C.T.
~
o.n
0
b.7
R
R
,075
R
2000
13.*
39. b
2
8
.1
*,1
0,0
1 25 PCT
T
25.9
bB
2*.*
,9*2
2,7
,073
,573
2000
13.b
*.1
b
*
7,7
8,5
7.3
8 55 PCT
T
57.1
150
39,0
, bB3
2,*
,080
,*15
2000
12, *
13,0
29
5
29,5
25,9
30,8
3 25 PCT
T
25,9
b8
2*.2
.135
2,3
,07b
,5b8
2000
13.2
3.8
7
7
b , b
8,*
7,3
* 10 PCT
T
9.9
25
1?.*
1 ,828
3«b
. Ob 9
1,112
2000
i * , b
1.3
2
0
2,8
*.5
2.0
5 25 PCT
T
25.9
b8
2*,*
.9*2
2,5
.07*
.573
2000
13.*
3.7
7
3
7.1
8,5
7,3
b 90 PCT
T
91.8
2*1
55,5
.bOS
2. b
.082
, 3bB
2000
12.2
13. b
32
8
38,*
28, 3
38,0
7 25 PCT
T
25.5
b 7
23,8
,933
2 . b
.075
,5b7
2000
13.3
3,5
7
2
7,*
8.3
7,2
8 C.T.
n.n
0
5,0
R
R
.077
R
2000
13,0
3b, 3
2
3
,1
3,2
0,0
9 IDLE
o.n
n
* • 3
R
P
,072
R
520
1*,0
20,7
*
q
.2
*.5
0,0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOP
CVCLE 1)-
18. b
30S
3,2
SUM
— (Composite
VALUE FOP
CYCLE 2)-
*
«
•
1
1
•
•
1
1
1
•
•
•
t
•
1
•
•
1
•
•
•
•
•
1
•
1
•
•
lb.3
27b
3,*
TWO CYCLE
composite
m
HC- FID
0.35C
18, b)
~ 0 ,b5(
lb
.3) «
17
,077
G/KW
HR (
12,735
BS)
CO- NOIR
0 . 35 (
308.b)
~ 0,b5(
275
.*) «
207
. 357
G/KW
HR (21*.282
S3)
NOX-CL
0 » 35 (
3.2)
~ 0,b5{
3
.*) ¦
3
,33*
G/KW
HR (
2 , * 8 b
BS)
HC ~
NOX «
20
.*12
G/KW
HR (
15,221
BS)
SFC «
.50*
KG/KW
HR (
.828
BS)
-------
APPENDIX C
NO BASELINE SUMMARIES OF THE RESULTS
X
Table Engine
Number Number Description
Summary of the Results
C-l 14 1971 Ford 361
C-2 15 1972 Dodge 413
C-3 16 1973 Chevrolet 454
C-4 17 1973 GMC 427
C-5 18 1972 Chevrolet 350
C-6 19 1972 IHC 345
C-7 20 1972 Ford 300
C-8 21 1973 IHC 304
C-9 22 1973 GMC 366
C-10 lla 1973 GMC 366
Engine 11 was retested as Engine 22.
-------
TABLE C-l. ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Cold
TEST 14-2
Hot
Composite
Cold
TEST 14-4
Hot
Composite
Avg. of
3 Tests
HC,
CO,
c02 /
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
22.78
245.31
971
5.99
12.94
203.35
990
6.82
14.35
209.34
987
6.70
21.40
243.45
960
6.18
14.23
206.81
870
6.06
15 .25
212.04
883
6.08
14.73
215.83
937
6.24
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.450
7.5
23.14
0.426
7.55
23.29
0.429
7.54
23.27
0.445
7.56
23.32
0.391
7.60
23.45
0.399
7.59
23.43
0.417
7.60
23.44
NINE MODE
IDLE
Test 14-1 Test 14-3 Test 14-4 Avg.
HC,
CO,
CO
2'
NOX,
SFC,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW
10.97
117.78
997.13
7.97
0.424
21.5
10.10
121.96
982.28
9.04
0.413
21.2
11.49
121.03
987.6
8.73
0.407
21.4
10.85
120.26
989.00
8.58
0.415
21.4
RPM
HC,
CO,
C02,
Fuel,
ppmC
%
%
kg/hr
Test 14-5C Test 14-6
550
13460
4.5
11.0
1.9
550
10620
4.2
10.6
1.8
Average
550
12040
4.4
10.8
1.9
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel
g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 14.73 (10.98)
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 215.83 (160.94)
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 6.24 (4.65)
HC
CO
NOX
35.32
517.58
14.96
10.75
157.57
4,56
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
0.417 (0.686)
7.60 (10.19)
FUEL CONS,
304,
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 14-4
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. COef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.*3
38.
1.001
.9981
-6.
1144
10.%
.994
.9178
3.1
1071
-0.2
6.%
1.007
.9618
.6
1071
38.
.998
.9981
5.
1144
8.%
.996
.9410
.3
1107
-0.3
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 14-2
Standard Error
Speed
40.
Torque
11.%
Power
6.%
Speed
38.
Torque
9.%
Power
4.%
Slope
1.001
.973
.999
.995
.968
.998
Corr. Coef.
.9980
.9055
.9652
.9981
.9300
.9770
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.^
-6.
1094
4.4
1041
-1.0 —
.6
1041
10.
1144
2.0
1116
-0.4
-.1
1116
4.%
1.006
.9735
-.1
1107
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTSC
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
Test 14-2
NYNF
LANF
EAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
58.60
52.97
39.35
20.85
20.15
27.17
33.32
17.04
CO, gram
226.91
420.00
993.80
199.63
182.46
282.28
888.50
181.49
CO2, gram
860.3
1591.0
4091.8
742.2
729.4
1527.0
4234.3
981.49
NOX, gram
4.42
10.19
26.25
4.08
4.14
13.07
30.35
3.93
FUEL, kg
0.442
0.762
1.822
0.354
0.340
0.648
1.808
0.417
KW-HR
0.60
1.43
4.86
0.61
0.62
1.45
4.87
0.61
TEST 14t-4
HC, gram
48.08
48.36
40.10
25.32
24.08
30.85
32.93
20.26
CO, gram
216.72
415.14
1001.05
208.14
196.35
307.08
871.26
197.04
CO2 gram
843.6
1550.3
4111.7
744.1
739.0
1472.5
3698.6
704.5
NOX, gram
4.43
10.56
27.12
4.59
4.30
12.65
24.85
4.28
FUEL, kg
.421
0.746
1.832
0.363
0.354
0.647
1.630
0.340
KW-HR
0.61
1.44
4.89
0.63
0.62
1.46
4.89
0.63
bTest kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cfcarometric Pressure: Test 14-2= 743 mm Hg Test 14-4 ¦ 740 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1972 Ford 361 CID
Carburetor: Holley 2-barrel No. D3HF-9510-CA
Distributor: No. C8TF 12102 A 961
Rated Power: 153 hp @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque: 278 ft. lbs @ 2400 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec. Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM ^78 @ 2400 282 @ 2100
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM 153 @ 3600 156 @ 3400
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max.
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
MINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS d
Torque
N.m
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Emissions,
grams/hour
V?eighted Fuel
& Power
Test
14-1
HC
CO
C02
NOx
kq/hr
kW
1
Idle
0
0.232
17.15
184.64
1195.7
0 .56
0 .526
0.00
2
25%
98
0.077
7.66
57.52
1847.8
14 .06
0.716
1.58
3
55%
207
0.147
23.14
109.37
5628.7
92.62
2.067
6.46
4
25%
96
0.077
5.86
58.26
1820.2
14.66
0.699
1.56
5
10%
45
0.057
2.42
14.04
723.7
3.51
0.401
0.54
6
25%
100
0.077
6.51
62.18
2037.0
17.23
0.727
1.64
7
90%
338
0.113
52.79 1954.54
5607.1
12.55
2.896
8.17
8
25%
92
0.077
5.75
58.12
1897.3
15 .52
0.695
1.51
9
CT
0
0.143
113.84
27.44
627 .5
0.14
0. 363
0.00
Test
14-3
1
Idle
0
0.232
23.11
240.79
833.0
0.45
0.474
0.00
2
25%
95
0.077
6.25
56.41
1823.14
13.49
0.681
1.53
3
55%
210
0.147
24.86
124.73
5663.15
106.14
2 .040
6.51
4
25%
95
0.077
5.91
62.21
1822.5
15 .10
0.681
1.54
5
10%
34
0.057
3.16
16.51
971.3
3.80
0.367
0.40
6
25%
100
0.077
6 .54
63.30
1880.5
16.50
0.699
1.63
7
90%
339
0.113
53.02
1925.89
5358.0
18.32
2.819
8.12
o
25%
88
0.077
6.37
66.79
1944.9
17.32
0.681
1.43
9
CT
0
IDLE :
0.143
RESULTS e
84.44
23.75
484.6
0.14
0.292
0.00
Bagged Undiluted
Calc
. from Bagged Dilute
Tost
14-5C
HC,
CO,
ppm
%
—
13460
4.5
co2,
FUEL,
%
kg/hr
10.92
1.9
D.
R.f
136
Test
14-6
10620
4.5
118
HC,
ppm
CO,
CO 2 r
FUEL,
a.
kg/hr
10.60
1.8
D.
R.f
^Barometric Pressure: Test 14-1 = 744 mm Hg Test 14-3 = 741 mm Hg
eIdle Speed: Test 14-5C = 550 rpifTest 14-6 = 550 rpm
^Calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values rranus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.)- ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 14-6 TEST
Cold Hot Composite Cold Hot Coir; do site Ave race
HC, g/kV,'-hr 19.07 13.85 14.60
CO, g/k*/?-hr 243.81 223.17 226.12
C02, g/kw-hr 913 947 942
NOX, g/kvr-hr 5.26 6. OS 5.95
SFC, kg/kv;-hr 0.423 0.423 0.424
WORK, kW-hr 7.71 7,65 7.66
kv-7 23.79 23.60 23.63
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 14-6
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
Soced
Toraue
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
32.
10.^
1:%
32.
10. S
5.%
Slope
1.006
.979
1.012
1.004.
.953
1.003
Corr. Coef.
.9986
.9202
.9634
.9987
.9240
.9731
Intercept
4.
5.9
1.3
7.
3.5
*5
-
Points Used
1144
1084
1084
1144
1116
1116
kw-hr Dev. 3
1.7
1.0
TRANSIENT
CYCLE NODAL
RESULTS;
-1
Cold
Cycle
not
Cvcle
Test 14-6
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LAN F
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
45 .63
46.61
37.07
17.65
25 .26
30.05
35.61
15.05
CO, gram
227.67
415.19
1035.14
200.55
191.64
315 .24
1000.27
200.36
CO2/ gram
804.3
1494.3
4018.0
716.5
792.5
156.51
4144.8
743.7
NOX, gram
4.12
10.09
22.52
3.82
3.29
13.03
25 .26
3 .82
FUEL, kg
0.412
0.724
1.316
0.343
0.370
0.680
1.838
0.349
KV.-ER
0.62
1.49
4.96
0.63
0 .G5
1.47
4.94
0.59
3 Test kW-hr :r.inus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr tiir.es 100%.
^Baronstrie Pressure: Test 14—6 = 741 mm Kg.
-------
TABLE C-l (Cont'd.) ENGINE 14 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1971 Ford 361
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS1
D
i
Test
14-4
Torque
N.m
Weighting
Factor
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted
KC
CO
C02
NO*
kg/hr
1
Idle
0
0.232
16.20
249.89
947.4
0.33
0.432
2
25%
95
0.077
6.27
59.18
1917.7
13.84
0.664
3
55%
210
0.147
24.20
120.09
5616.8
101.25
2.020
4
25%
95
0.077
6.16
63.05
1901.7
15.79
0.664
5
10%
38
0.057
3.76
18.28
1047.3
3.87
0.362
6
25%
95
0.077
6.17
64.95
1887.5
15.63
0.664
7
90%
343
0.113
53.78
1925.94
5108.9
18.32
2.747
8
25%
95
0.077
6.27
64.99
1872.0
17.21
0.671
9
CT
0
0.143
122.57
17.57
786.6
0.27
0.454
Test
1
Idle
2
25%
3
55%
4
25%
5
10%
6
25%
7
90%
8
25%
9
CT
kW
0.00
1.54
6.51
1.53
0.45
1.54
8.24
1.54
0.00
iBarometric Pressure: Test 14-4 = 739 mm Hg
-------
TABLE C-2. ENGINE 15 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Dodge 413
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
CO 21
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
TEST 15-1
Cold
15.05
232.2
1009.
6.13
Hot
10.01
209.0
959.
7.67
Composite
10.73
211.3
966.
7.45
Cold
12.79
231.5
1029.
6.11
TEST 15-2
Hot
7.58
208.5
993.
6.99
Composite
8.32
211.8
998.
6.86
Average
9.53
211.6
982.
7.16
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.448
8.80
27.1
0.416
8.74
27.0
0.421
8.75
27.1
0.442
8.76
27.0
0.424
8.68
26.8
0.428
8.69
26.9
0.424
8.72
27.0
NINE MODE
IDLE*
HC, g/kW-hr
CO, g/kW-hr
CO2, g/kW-hr
NOX, gAW-hr
SFC, kg/kW-hr
POWER, kW
Test 15-2 Test 15-3
10.70
74.5
1140.
9.16
0.424
23.1
10.77
66.5
1124.
9.36
0.422
23.2
Average
10.74
70.5
1132.
9.26
0.423
23.2
RPM
HC, ppmC
CO, %
C02, %
Fuel, kg/hr
Test 15-4
700
11600
8.5
8.4
2.9
Test 15-5
700
12350
8.5
8.6
3.1
Average
700
12000
8.5
8.5
3.0
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 9.53 ( 7.11) HC
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 211.6 (157.8 ) CO
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 7.16 ( 5.34) NOX
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.424 ( 0.697) FUEL CONS.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.72 ( 11.69)
g/kq Fuel
22.48
499.1
16.89
g/kma
7.98
177.3
6.00
355.
aUsing a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-2 (Cont'd)
. ENGINE 15
SUMMARY OF
RESULTS
1972 Dodge
413
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 15-1
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
32.
8.%
6. %
36.
6. %
4.%
Slope
1.003
0.972
0.988
1.003
0.973
0.992
Corr. Coef.
.9987
.9509
.9727
.9983
.9700
.9810
Intercept
18.
2.1
0.8
22.
-.2
-.2
Points Used
1144
1104
1104
1144
1143
1143
1 q%
KW—AjT U6V •
TEST 15-2
Standard Error
36.
10.%
6. %
34.
11.%
5.%
Slope
0.997
0.947
0.989
.997
.895
.975
Corr. Coef.
.9983
.9168
.9670
.9985
.9021
.9688
Intercept
11.
4.5
.5
15.
6.7
.1
Points Used
1144
1107
1107
1144
1144
1144
kW-hr Dev.b
1.8%
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS1
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 15-1
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
50.81
28.36
31.32
21.85
18.08
20.65
29.46
CO, gram
339.45
366.34
1086.05
249.99
222.19
265.38
1072.61
CO2» gram
1051.5
1924.7
5006.0
891.6
869.0
1742.4
4921.1
NOX, gram
3.29
12.97
33.59
4.10
5.60
16.50
39.77
FUEL, kg
0.550
0.817
2.147
0.427
0.402
0.701
2.112
KW-HR
0.73
1.71
5.63
0.72
0.72
1.68
5.62
TEST 15-2
HC, gram
48.67
23.46
27.97
11.87
9.77
16.12
27.57
CO, gram
343.67
381.82
1085.22
216.63
216.60
258.78
1101.43
C02» gram
1070.8
1953.1
5107.4
875.8
899.5
1879.0
4933.2
NOX, grajn
3.61
12.26
33.22
4.41
4.88
15.79
35.17
FUEL, kg
0.556
0.828
2.176
0.395
0.401
0.737
2.128
KW-HR
0.73
1.71
5.63
0.68
0.71
1.67
5.62
NYNF
19.33
266.54
854.3
5.21
0.421
0.72
12.38
233.74
912.4
4.81
0.416
0.68
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
°Barometric Pressure: Testl5-1 = 740- mm Hg Test 15-2 = 738 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE C-2 (Cont'd). ENGINE 15 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Dodge 413
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1972 Dodge 413
Carburetor: Holley 4-bore No. 3698395
Distributor: No. 3656839 (Electronic Ignition)
Rated Power : 238 hp at 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque : 407 ft-lb at 2000 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE TUNE-UP DATA
0
1
Total Advance, Deg. @ RPM &
Mech. Advance, Deg. RPM
Vac. Advance, Deg. @ In. Hg.
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max.(avg.)
Idle RPM
Comments:
Mfg. Spec.
In. Hg. ~ "
13.5 @ 1900
9.5 @ 13.5
N.A.
N.A.
100-140
700
Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
POWER MAPPING @ Temp - 84 °F
Baro -
29.10"Hq
Measured
13.5 0 1900
9.5 @ 13.5
300 @ 2400
164 @ 3600
100-110 (105)
700
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
Z2_
RPM
TQ
RPM
T2_
-
—
1100
279
2100
294
3100
276
4100
199
-
—
1200
289
2200
297
3200
268
4200
192
-
—
1300
295
2300
298
3300
259
4300
400
—
1400
292
2400
300
3400
253
4400
500
200
1500
292
2500
299
3500
245
4500
600
215
1600
293
2600
297
3600
239
4600
700
238
1700
291
2700
295
3700
231
4700
800
243
1800
292
2800
292
3800
224
4800
900
255
1900
292
2900
289
3900
215
4900
1000
269
2000
292
3000
283
4000
207
5000
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1973 Concorde M30 Motor Home
Serial Number: M39CN3S060736
Transmission: Automatic GVW: 11,000 lbs
-------
TABLE C-2 (Cont'd). ENGINE 15 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Dodge 413
NINE-
¦MODE
MODAL RESULTS
d
Torque
Weighting
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
& Power
Test 15-2
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
CO 2
N0X
kq/hr
kW
1
Idle
0
0.232
43.57
646.95
1173.5
0.00
0.758
0.000
2
25%
102
0.077
1.79
39.25
2356.1
8.46
0.803
1.644
3
55%
228
0.147
12.98
185.22
6671.1
72.13
2.327
7.076
4
25%
102
0.077
1.67
42.99
2374.6
8.94
0.800
1.653
5
10%
41
0.057
0.75
34.34
1336.7
2.16
0.543
0.488
6
25%
106
0.077
2.00
48.81
2421.0
9.86
0.810
1.725
7
90%
369
0.113
21.91
454.7
7180.7
100.82
2.553
8.850
8
25%
100
0.077
1.89
55.06
2316.7
8.65
0.793
1.630
9
CT
0
0.143
160.40
209.97
465.7
0.14
0.487
0.000
Test
15-3
1
Id.le
0
0.232
46.41
618.10
1081.0
0.33
0.737
0.000
2
25%
106
0.077
1.19
35.24
2368.0
9.30
0.814
1.705
3
55%
228
0.147
11.43
161.28
6533.7
71.41
2.300
7.059
4
25%
102
0.077
1.57
40.57
2359.9
9.57
0.796
1.655
5
10%
36
0.057
0.75
25.68
1299.7
2.15
0.445
0.423
6
25%
106
0.077
1.57
34.51
2419.2
10.49
0.821
1.717
7
90%
370
0.113
19.91
361.70
7148.8
103.65
2.563
8.927
8
25%
102
0.077
1.79
42.13
2375.5
9.51
0.803
1.661
9
CT
0
0.143
164.74
220.52
437.6
0.14
0.480
0.000
TWO-SPEED IDLE RESULTSe
Garage-Type Analyzer (ppmH) Bagged Undiluted Calc. from Bagged Dilute
Test 15-4
Low
High
Low
High
Low
HC, ppm
—
—
11600
CO, %
8.2
— ¦
in
•
CO
co2, %
—
8.4
—
N0X, ppm
—
20
£
——
FUEL, kg/hr
2.9
—
D.R.£
93
Test 15-5
HC, ppm
—
12350
CO, %
8.1
8.5
co2, %
—
8.6
—
NOX, ppm
—
•
*—
~~~
FUEL, kg/hr
3.1
D.R. 9
90
^Barometric
Pressure: Test
15-2
= 738.4 mm Hg
Test 15-3
= 742.4 mm Hg
eLow Idle =
700 RPM
High
Idle = 2500 RPM
fCalculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-3.ENGINE 16 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 Chevrolet 454
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
CO?
NOx'
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
Cold
4.65
111.30
1227.
6.08
Test 16-1
Hot
3.98
102.53
1142.
6.13
Coropo-si te
4.08
103.78
1154.
6.12
Cold
4.41
106.85
1222.
6.17
Test 16-2
Hot
3.63
95.51
1155.
6.15
Composite
3.74
97.13
1165.
6.15
Average
3.91
100.46
1160.
6.14
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.447
8.89
27.4
0.415
8.95
27.6
0.420
8.94
27.6
0.443
8.87
27.4
0.415
8.87
27.4
0.419
8.87
27.4
0.420
8.91
27.5
NINE MODE
Test 16-1 Test 16-3 Average
IDLE
Test 16-1
Test 16-2
Average
HC,
CO,
CO
2'
NOX,
SFC,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW
6.26
32.81
1299.3
5.82
0.455
22.0
7.15
29.68
1284.9
6.21
0.467
22.0
6.71
31.25
1292.1
6.02
0.461
22.0
RPM 700
HC, ppmC 4459
CO, % 1.03
C02, % 13.65
Fuel, kg/hr 2.7
700
5734
0.79
13.10
2.7
700
5097
0.91
13.38
2.7
TRANSIENT CYCLE AW RAGE VALUES
HC,
CO,
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
3.91 ( 2.92)
100.46 (74.91)
6.14 ( 4.58)
Kg/kW-hr(Ib/hp-hr) 0.420 ( 0.691)
kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.91 (11.95)
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL CONS,
g/kg Fuel
9.31
239.19
14.62
g/km
3.35
85.98
5.26
359.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle,
-------
TABLE c-3 (Cont'd) .ENGINE 16 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 Chevrolet 454
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle Hot Cycle
TEST 16-1 Speed Torque Power Speed Torque Power
Standard Error 54. 7.% 4.% 55. 5.% 3.%
Slope .999 .935 .983 .998 .973 .994
Corr. Coef. .9968 .9426 .9742 .9968 .9769 .9854
Intercept -5. 6.8 .7 0. 2.7 .2
Points Used 1144 1089 1089 1144 1112 1112
kW-hr Dev.*3 -8.9 -8.3
TEST 16-2
Standard Error 52.
Slope 1.001
Corr. Coef. .9971
Intercept -7.
Points Used 1144
kW-hr Dev.*3
8.% 4.% 52. 5.% 3.%
.919 .983 1.001 .957 .995
.9305 .9733 .9971 .9695 .9832
8.0 .8 -3. 4.6 .3
1083 1083 1144 1108 1108
-9.0 9.0
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS0
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
TEST 16-1
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
12.87
5.89
18.80
3.76
7.18
5.31
18.77
4.31
CO, gram
129.04
73.26
730.74
55.89
42.90
61.16
754.87
58.22
CO2# gram
1378.4
2498.4
5834.9
1188.6
1121.6
2348.6
5568.7
1175.1
NOX, gram
2.89
11.43
35.80
3.90
3.94
11.84
35.18
3.92
FUEL, kg
0.511
0.830
2.220
0.406
0.382
0.776
2.148
0.404
KW-HR
0.67
1.69
5 .86
0.66
0.68
1.70
5.88
0.68
TEST 16-2
HC, gram
11.86
5.83
17.98
3.41
6.17
5.00
17.67
3.39
CO, gram
138.02
62.27
704.01
43.48
35.75
50.92
715.43
45.11
CO2, gram
1363.9
2528.5
5722.2
1224.6
1147.6
2373.1
5561.8
1164.6
NOX, gram
2.78
12.02
36.19
3.75
3.77
11.61
35.31
3.90
FUEL, kg
0.510
0.834
2.171
0.411
0.386
0.778
2.125
0.393
KW-HR
0.66
1.71
5.84
0.66
0.66
1.71
5.84
0.66
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 16-1 = 747 mm Hg Test 16-2 = 751 mm Hg •
-------
TABLE c-3 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 16 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 Chevrolet 454
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1973 Chevrolet 454 Serial No. TO 608 TRC
Carburetor: Rochester Quadra Jet 4-barrel No. 7043507QB
Distributor: No. 1112113
Rated Power: 240 hp @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque : 355 ft-lb @ 2800 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec.
Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max.
Idle RPM
(avg.)
N. A.
N.A.
105-150
700
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
303 @ 2800
210 @ 3900
120-135 (125)
700
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) &
Temp. - 73°F Baro. - 29.29 "Hq
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
-
-
1100
256
2100
284
3100
300
4100
265
-
-
1200
270
2200
283
3200
300
4200
258
-
-
1300
281
2300
283
3300
300
4300
248
400
-
1400
282
2400
289
3400
299
4400
237
500
-
1500
280
2500
293
3500
296
4500
-
600
-
1600
279
2600
297
3600
295
4600
-
700
-
1700
271
2700
298
3700
289
4700
-
800
285
1800
268
2800
303
3800
286
4800
-
900
265
1900
272
2900
302
3900
283
4900
-
1000
249
2000
278
3000
300
4000
274
5000
-
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1973 Chevalier 18-foot Step-Van
Transmission: Automatic GVW: 11,800 lbs
-------
0
1
I-*
Ul
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS'
TABLE C-3 (Cont'd).ENGINE 16 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 Chevrolet 454
Weighted Emissions, grams/hour
Test 16-1
HC,
ppm
CO,
%
co2,
%
Test
16-2
HC,
ppm
CO,
%
C02,
Bagged Undiluted
13.65
FUEL 2.7 kg/hr
13.10
FUEL 2.7 kg/hr
Calc. from Bagged Dilute
4459.
1.03
D.R.f 91
5734.
0.79
D.R.f 94
Weighted Fuel & Power
Test
16-1
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
C02
NOy
kg/hr
kW
1
Idle
0
0.232
11.39
88.48
1561.3
0.61
0.610
0.00
2
25%
98
0.077
0.28
5.74
2658.0
5.27
0.880
1.57
3
55%
220
0.147
1.43
23.69
7424.3
40.40
2.427
6.76
4
25%
95
0.077
0.26
5.03
2606.0
5.41
0.866
1.53
5
10%
41
0.057
0.08
2.41
1565.9
1.86
0.525
0.48
6
25%
100
0.077
0.23
5.11
2664.8
5.72
0.891
1.62
7
90%
359
0.113
24.15
509.64
7043.5
63.19
2.578
8.50
8
25%
98
0.077
0.25
5.35
2588.5
5.64
0.866
1.57
9
CT
0
0.143
99.91
77.77
528.7
0.19
0.383
0.00
Test
16-3
1
Idle
0
0.232
16.93
92.54
1549.9
0.31
0.631
0.00
2
25%
100
0.077
0.31
5.53
2631.0
7.16
0.873
1.62
3
55%
217
0.147
1.09
20.34
7190.6
37.89
2.401
6.68
4
25%
96
0.077
0.19
4.79
2622.6
6.92
0.873
1.55
5
10%
38
0.057
0.08
2.11
1491.7
1.68
0.517
0.46
6
25%
100
0.077
0.19
4.93
2653.5
5.74
0.891
1.62
7
90%
359
0.113
25.24
416.44
6972.7
69.47
2.589
8.50
8
25%
98
0.077
0.21
5.01
2591.5
7.02
0.873
1.57
9
CT
0
0.143
113.07
101.06
562.8
0.36
0.631
0.00
IDLE
RESULTS e
^Barometric Pressure: Test 16-1 = 749.3 mm Hg Test 16-3 = 752.1 mm Hg
eIdle Speed: Test 16-1 "700 rpm Test 16-2 700 rpm
^Calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-4. ENGINE 17 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 427
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
Test 17-2
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
SFC, kg/kW-hr
WORK, kW-hr
POWER, kw
Methane, g/kW-hr
Cold
10.09
85.12
1066.
10.05
0.388
9.13
28.2
0.69
Hot
7.33
65.45
1038.
10.41
0.367
9.19
28.4
0.47
Composite
7.72
68.26
1042.
10.36
0.370
9.18
28.3
0.50
Cold
10.03
85.05
1052.
10.63
0.384
9.30
28.7
0.59
Test 17-3
Hot
8.00
65.05
1031.
11.46
0.365
9.25
28.5
0.49
Composite
8.29
67.91
1034.
11.34
0.368
9.26
28.6
0.50
Average
8.01
68.09
1038.
10.85
0.369
9.22
28.4
0.50
NINE MODE
IDLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW
Test 17-1 Test 17-2 Average
11.13
43.84
1038.
9.87
0.383
25.5
10.08
49.35
1081.
9.62
0.391
25.6
10.61
46.60
1060.
9.75
0.387
25.6
KPM
HC, ppmC
CO, %
C02, %
Fuel, kg/hr
Test 17-1
530
8175
2.9
11.2
2.2
Test 17-2
530
7210
2.6
11.3
2.3
Average
530
7690
2.7
11.3
2.2
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
8.01
( 5.97 )
HC
21.71
7.09
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
68.09
(50.78 )
CO
184.53
60.30
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr)
10.85
( 8.09 )
NOX
29.40
9.61
Methane, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
0.50
( 0.37 )
Methane
1.36
0.44
SFC , kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
0.369
( 0.607)
FUEL CONS.
—~» .
327.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
9.22
(12.36)
a Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-4 (Cont'd).ENGINE 17 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 427
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 17-2
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
66.
10. %
5.%
67.
6. %
4.%
Slope
.987
.940
.974
.988
.966
.979
Corr. Coef.
.9954
.9157
.9624
.9952
.9698
.9793
Intercept
35.
-.8
-.2
39.
-1.1
-.1
Points Used
1144
1139
1139
1144
1144
1144
__ _ c 0 _
TEST 17-3
O • J ™
Standard Error
68.
9.%
5.%
67.
6.%
3.%
Slope
.985
.956
.977
.988
.985
.996
Corr. Coef.
.9951
.9397
.9700
.9953
.9689
.9795
Intercept
36.
-.0
.5
.37
-2.2
-.5
Points Used
1144
1134
1134
1144
1142
1142
kW-hr Dev.b
-4.7 -
-5.1
D
I
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 17-2
HC, gram
CO, gram
c02' gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
TEST 17-3
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2, gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
NYNF
35.09
196.40
1086.5
4.75
.475
.74
33.91
188.93
1092.8
5.02
.472
.75
LANF
19.58
142.54
2188.4
15.65
.780
1.80
19.81
136.91
2170.6
17.74
.772
1.83
LAF
28.34
374.85
544 8.2
65.74
1.932
5.85
26.66
373.84
5508.0
70.35
1.948
5.93
NYNF
9.11
63.67
1012.8
5.62
.360
.74
12.90
91.15
1011.3
5.71
.377
.79
NYNF
14.29
78.18
1018.5
5.64
.374
•77
17.03
80.37
1013.7
5.84
.376
.75
LANF
15.18
95.41
2125.4
17.22
.732
1.82
18.15
102.69
2129.5
18.12
.740
1.83
LAF
25.08
336.35
5379.6
67.11
1.888
5.83
25.93
337.87
5433.3
76.43
1.906
5.89
NYNF
12.80
91.31
1009.4
5.67
.376
.77
12.90
81.05
963.6
5.66
.357
.78
k>Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 17-2 = 744 mm Hg Test 17-3 = 744 mm Hg •
-------
TABLE C-4 (Cont'd) .ENGINE 17 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 427
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine:
Carburetor:
Distributor:
Rated Power:
Maximum Torque:
Comments:
1973 GMC 427 Serial Number T1113AHT
Holley 4-bore No. 1111365
No. 1111365
230 hp at 4000 rpm
360 ft-lb at 2800 rpm
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec. Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.)
Idle RPM
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @ Temp. - 89 Baro. - 29-14
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
_
-
1100
285
2100
327
3100
311
4100
_
-
-
1200
294
2200
327
3200
309
4200
-
-
-
1300
300
2300
327
3300
305
4300
-
400
150
1400
303
2400
326
3400
301
4400
-
500
220
1500
309
2500
327
3500
300
4500
-
600
259
1600
315
2600
322
3600
295
4600
-
700
254
1700
318
2700
319
3700
289
4700
-
800
264
1800
323
2800
317
3800
283
4800
-
900
273
1900
323
2900
315
3900
275
4900
-
1000
278
2000
325
3000
312
4000
267
5000
-
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1973 GMC Tractor
Model Number; CE 66213
Transmission: Automatic GVW: 31r500 lbs
N.A. 32002800
N.A. 20303800
Low 80% of High 100-125(110)
550 550
not applicable.
-------
TABLE C-4 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 17 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 427
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS'*
Test
17-1
Torque
N.m
Weighting
Factor
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
S Power
HC
CO
C02
NO*
kq/hr
kW
1
idle
0
0.232
37.33
99.14
1076.3
0.22
0.474
0.00
2
25%
118
0.077
6.42
78.74
2440.1
9.43
0.856
1.90
3
55%
251
0.147
23.69
266.70
6647.8
70.35
2.521
7.74
4
25%
113
0.077
8.38
124.62
2364.3
9.03
0.838
1.81
5
10%
45
0.057
1.94
42.70
1276.9
1.98
0.465
0.54
6
25%
119
0.077
7.64
118.69
2055.5
8.70
0.870
1.92
7
90%
407
0.113
30.10
219.14
8054.5
142.4
2.763
9.75
8
25%
117
0.077
8.88
136.06
2377.7
9.75
0.866
1.88
9
CT
0
0.143
159.90
33.77
225.0
0.14
0.331
0.00
Test
17-2
1
Idle
0
0.232
35.39
92.99
1174.8
0.22
0.463
0.00
2
25%
121
0.077
5.61
79.54
2499.0
9.53
0.873
1.95
3
55%
252
0.147
24.73
284.92
7243.7
74.56
2.534
7.79
4
25%
113
0.077
7.02
109.34
2364.9
8.48
0.849
1.81
5
10%
46
0.057
1.61
37.22
1380.7
2.22
0.476
0.55
6
25%
114
0.077
7.13
103.75
2422.9
9.47
0.852
1.83
7
90%
414
0.113
32.48
273.23
8019.7
132.66
2.794
9.83
8
25%
117
0.077
8.95
139.43
2406.6
9.37
0.873
1.88
9
CT
0
0.143
135.53
145.28
218.3
0.21
0.324
0.00
IDLE RESULTS1
Test 17-1
HC,
CO,
co2,
ppm
%
%
Bagged Undiluted
11.2
FUEL 2.2 kg/hr
Calc. from Bagged Dilute
8175.
2.9
D.R.f 102
Test 17-2
HC,
CO,
C02j
ppm
%
%
11.3
FUEL 2.3kg/hr
7210.
2.6
D.R.
103
^Barometric Pressure: Test 17-1 = 742.95 mm Hg Test 17-2 = 742.70 mm Hg
eidle Speed: Test 17-1 = 530 rpm Test 17-2 = 530 rpm
^Calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-5. ENGINE 18 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Chevrolet 350
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
Cold
8.74
96.70
964.
8.36
Test 18-1
Hot
4.80
109.38
883.
8.26
Composite
5.36
107.57
895.
8.27
Cold
7.35
125.35
902.
8.60
Test 18-3
Hot
4.50
105.64
907.
8.51
Composite
4.91
108.46
906.
8.52
Average
5.14
108.02
901.
8.40
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Methane, g/kW-hr
0.361
8.00
24.7
0.48
0.337
8.10
25.0
0.35
0.340
8.09
25.0
0.37
0.354
7.85
24.2
0.343
7.89
24.3
0. 345
7.88
24.3
0.343
7.99
24.7
0.37
NINE MODE
IDLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
TeBt 18-2 Test 18-4 Average
POWER,
kW
8.72
41.01
1000.49
9.91
0.373
20.2
9.29
47.31
1007.40
9.49
0.374
19.9
9.01
44.16
1003.95
9.70
0.374
20.1
RPM
HC, ppmC
CO, %
C02, %
Fuel, kg/hr
Test 18-1
600
3500
1.6
12.5
2.2
Test 18-2
610
4915
3.0
11.9
2.0
Average
605
4210
2.3
12.2
2.1
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel
g/km
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
Methane, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
SFC, kg/kW-hr(Ib/hp-hr)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
5.14
108.02
8.40
0.37
( 3.83)
(80.55)
( 6.26)
( 0.28)
0.343 ( 0.564)
7.99 (10.72)
HC
CO
NOX
Methane
FUEL CONS.
14.99
314.93
24.49
1.08
3.95
82.91
6.45
0.28
263.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-5 (Cont'd). ENGINE 18 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Chevrolet 350
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 18-1
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.b
TEST 18-3
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.b
Speed
64.
.993
.9958
13.
1144
70.
.987
.9949
18.
1144
Cold Cycle
Torque
12.%
.863
.8609
14.5
1137
+0.2 -
8.%
.931
.9372
6.2
1135
-1.8 -
Power
7.%
.976
.9638
1.4
1137
4.%
.981
.9837
.5
1135
Speed
72.
.992
.9947
15.
1144
79.
1.010
.9953
-36.
1144
Hot Cycle
Torque
5.%
.974
.9763
4.8
1143
+1.5 -
6.%
.975
.9635
-2.8
1144
-1.2
Power
5.%
.996
.9894
.9
1143
5.%
.950
.9789
.6
1144
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
TEST 18-1
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
24.97
13.98
13.27
17.70
6.46
9.22
17.79
CO, gram
231.02
176.36
262.84
103.17
91.97
172.75
514.86
CO2» gram
789.8
1555.8
4575.9
788.9
740.6
1485.4
4236.2
NOX, gram
2.49
10.92
48.92
4.52
4.59
12.84
45.15
FUEL, kg
0.388
0.592
1.586
0.318
0.285
0.563
1.608
KW-HR
0.71
1.50
5.13
0.67
0.68
1.53
5.23
TEST 18-3
HC, gram
21.18
14.06
17.16
5.25
5.43
7.58
16.69
CO, gram
243.61
163.76
464.82
111.56
96.25
143.97
473.95
CO2, gram
703.7
1490.5
4165.1
716.9
736.1
1515.4
4193.7
NOX, gram
2.67
12.57
47.55
4.74
4.55
13.43
44.50
FUEL, kg
0.364
0.565
1.560
0.287
0.285
0.557
1.574
KW-HR
0.64
1.46
5.10
0.65
0.64
1.50
5.10
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 18-1 = 751 mm Hg Test 18-3 = 742 mm Hg -
NYNF
5.41
106.77
694.1
4.33
0.277
0.67
5.82
119.62
715.8
4.65
0.291
0.65
-------
TABLE C-5 (Cont'd). ENGINE 18 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Chevrolet 350
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1972 Chevrolet 350 Serial No. VO 210 TLX
Carburetor: Rochester Quadra Jet 4-barrel No. 7042208 QC 0402
Distributor: No. 1112047 2A19
Rated Power: 175 hp @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque: 290 ft-lb @ 2400 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec,
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM N.A.
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM N.A.
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.) 130-150
Idle RPM 60°
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
Measured
256 @ 2800
155 @ 3900
125-150 (135)
600
POWER
MAPPING (TQ in
ft-lb) @
Temp. - 74°F
Baro.
_ 29.37 " Hg.
RPM
TQ
RPM
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
-
__
1100
231
2100
236
3100
248
4100
194
-
-
1200
233
2200
242
3200
243
4200
185
-
-
1300
237
2300
247
3300
237
4300
179
400
204
1400
235
2400
250
3400
233
4400
170
500
219
1500
233
2500
253
3500
227
4500
163
600
220
1600
232
2600
255
3600
220
4600
-
700
220
1700
230
2700
255
3700
215
4700
-
800
223
1800
230
2800
256
3800
212
4800
-
900
220
1900
232
2900
254
3900
208
4900
-
1000
227
2000
234
3000
253
4000
201
5000
-
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1972 Chevrolet Step-Van
Model: Olson Kurbmaster
Transmission: Automatic
GVW: 9,000 to 14,999 lbs.
-------
TABLE C-5 (Cont'd). ENGINE 18 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Chevrolet 350
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS d
Torque Weighting
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
£ Power
Test
18-2
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
CO 2
NO*
kg/hr
kW
1
Idle
0
0.232
9.49
159.02
847.73
0.53
0.421
0.00
2
25%
89
0.077
4.61
11.63
1688.06
13.66
0.583
1.45
3
55%
195
0.147
10.88
33.06
5396.96
66.12
1.834
6.07
4
25%
92
0.077
4.70
12.11
1728.06
14.60
0.587
1.49
5
10%
33
0.057
2.33
17.74
846.25
2.03
0.303
0.39
6
25%
89
0.077
4. 41
11.25
1668.47
13.72
0.583
1.45
7
90%
328
0.113
25.18
506.22
5909.86
74.31
2.307
7.84
8
25%
91
0.077
4.53
13.35
1702.66
14.43
0.594
1.47
9
CT
0
0.143
109.55
61.78
371.00
0.26
0.305
0.00
Test
18-4
1.
Idle
0
0.232
8.60
131.21
856.08
0.36
0.421
0.00
2
25%
94
0.077
5.11
13.11
1673.09
14.63
0.583
1.51
3
55%
195
0.147
11.25
32.99
5446.70
67.77
1.854
6.05
4
25%
89
0.077
5.19
14.79
1708.85
14.77
0.576
1.45
5
10%
35
0.057
3.04
26.48
885.44
2.51
0.310
0.42
6
25%
94
0.077
5.09
13.36
1738.41
15.76
0.594
1.51
7
90%
319
0.113
27.57
629.55
5676.35
59.23
2.255
7.54
8
25%
86
0.077
4.79
15.79
1647.12
13.48
0.576
1.40
9
CT
0
0.143
114.13
62.96
387.99
0.14
0.259
0.00
IDLE
RESULTSe
Bagged Undiluted
Calc.
. from Bagged Dilute
Test
18-1
HC,
ppm
—
3500.
CO,
%
—
1.
6
co2,
%
12.47
£
FUEL 2.3 kg/hr
D .R.
128
Test
18-2
HC,
ppm
—
4917.
CO,
%
—
3.
0
C02,
%
11.94
e
FUEL 2.0 kg/hr
D .R.
147
^Barometric Pressure: Test 18-2 = 746.25 mm Hg Test 18-4 = 739.14 mm Hg
eIdle Speed: Test 18-1 600 rpm Test 18-2 610 rpm
^Calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TAELE C-6. ENGINE 19 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 IHC 345
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
CO 2 /
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
Cold
9.45
160.94
871
6.78
TEST 19-2
Hot
5.86
155.28
862
6.85
Composite
6.37'
156.09
863
6.84
Cold
10.28
153.54
845
6.25
TEST 19-3
Hot
5.81
143.78
825
6.18
Composite
6.45
145.17
828
6.19
Ave rage
6.41
150.63
846
6.52
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kw-hr
kW-hr
kW
Methane, g/kW-hr
0.364
8.64
26.65
0.54
0.354
8.67
26.75
0.41
0.355
8.67
26.74
0.43
0.353
8.74
26.96
0.53
0.337
8.76
27.02
0.40
0.339
8.76
27.01
0.42
0.347
8.72
26.88
0.43
NINE MODE
IDLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kw-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW
Test 19-1 Test 19-2 Average
8.33
45.58
957.5
9.04
0.393
20.34
8.48
46.08
954.5
9.40
0.387
20.30
8.41
45.83
956.0
9.22
0.390
20.32
RPM
HC, ppmC
CO, %
C02, %
Fuel, kg/hr
Test 19-1
710
2121
1.3
11.12
2.2
Test 19-2
710
2071
1.5
10.86
2.2
Average
710
2096
1.4
10.99
2.2
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel
g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 6.41 ( 4.78) HC 18.47
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 150.63 (112.32) CO 434.09
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 6.52 ( 4.86) NOX 18.79
Methane g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 0.43 ( 0.32) Methane 1.24
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.347 < 0.571) FUEL CONS.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.72 < 11.69)
5.37
216.18
5.46
0.36
291.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 IHC 345
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 19-2
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
44.
7.%
5.%
52.
6.%
5.%
Slope
.984
.988
1.000
.984
.973
.998
Corr. Coef.
19977
.9571
.9767
.9969
.9641
.9772
Intercept
29.
2.6
.6
35.
2.9
.5
Points Used
1144
1052
1052
1144
1079
— — 1 *7
1079
jvw nx ucv *
TEST 19-3
Standard Error
44.
7.%
5.%
47.
6.%
6.%
Slope
.990
1.000
1.010
.987
.992
1.000
Corr. Coef.
.9978
.9632
.9811
.9975
.9744
.9844
Intercept
22.
2.6
.8
31.
3.9
1.1
Points Used
1144
1134
1134
1144
1144
1144
kW-hr Dev.*5
2.4
2.6
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS c
Cold
Cycle
Hot Cycle
Test 19-2
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
34.79
15.59
23.91
7.38
8.44
12,27
25.27
CO, gram
184.02
231.31
843.55
132.37
105.61
204.26
912.53
CO2, gram
965.6
1669.8
4139.8
750.3
820.1
1585.6
4210.1
NOX, gram
4.23
12.32
38.14
3.95
4.26
12.77
38.25
FUEL, kg
0.430
0.657
1.747
0.309
0.319
0.613
1.805
KW-HR
0.71
1.68
5.51
0.74
0.74
1.68
5.51
TEST 19-3
HC, gram
40.79
17.71
24.88
6.48
6.63
12.93
25.11
CO, gram
189.19
203.46
818.73
130.92
96.13
204.71
831.64
CO2 gram
908.3
1620.7
4085.6
775.1
803.2
1578.0 4060.0
NOX, gram
3.56
11.87
35.31
3.92
3.82
11.97
34.62
FUEL, kg
0.421
0.629
1.718
0.316
0.307
0.612
1.717
KW-HR
0.71
1.70
5.61
0.73
0.71
1.71
5.61
NYNF
4.8
124.5
859.7
4.1
0.3
0.7
6.2
126.6
784.6
3.6
0.3
0.7
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 19.2= 739 mm Hg Test 19.3 = 745 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE C-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 IHC 345
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1972 International Harvester 345 Serial No. 1099236V345E
Carburetor: Holley 2-bore No. 454578-C91
Distributor: No. 433142
Rated Power: 197 hp @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque: 309 ft-lb. @ 2200 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec. Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM N.A. 279 @ 2200
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM N •A • 152 @ 4000
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.) 80% High 115 - 125(120)
Idle RPM 700 700
Comments:
Rated Power and Maximum Torque
are not
applicable.
POWER MAPPING (TQ
in ft-lb) @
1 Temp.
- 81°F
Baro. - 29
.39"Hg
RPM
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
-
1100
249
2100
281
3100
253
4100
195
-
1200
258
2200
279
3200
248
4200
190
-
1300
264
2300
278
3300
244
4300
-
-
1400
268
2400
274
3400
236
4400
-
500
210
1500
271
2500
272
3500
231
4500
-
600
211
1600
275
2600
269
3600
226
4600
-
700
210
1700
278
2700
268
3700
220
4700
-
800
208
1800
281
2800
265
3800
214
4800
-
900
227
1900
282
2900
262
3900
206
4900
-
1000
241
2000
282
3000
258
4000
200
5000
-
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1972 IHC Load Star 1600 Truck
Transmission: Manual GVW:
-------
TABLE C-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 IHC 345
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS3
Torque
Weighting
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted
Test
19-1
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
C02
NOx
kg/hr
1
Idle
0
0.232
7.38
107.84
1110.3
0.53
0.600
2
25%
92
0.077
5.54
18.67
1680.2
12.16
0.611
3
55%
201
0.147
21.38
108.50
5037.5
75.94
1.920
4
25%
91
0.077
5.05
18.33
1643.1
11.89
0.639
5
10%
39
0.057
1.89
10.75
914.0
2.52
0.349
6
25%
92
0.077
5.43
17.55
1642.2
12.49
0.629
7
90%
329
0.113
28.96
589.39
5353.6
55.77
2.281
8
25%
92
0.077
5.42
19.85
1634.3
12.41
0.629
9
CT
0
0.143
88.41
28.18
475.7
0.24
0.350
kW
0.00
1.48
6.17
1.46
0.47
1.48
7.80
1.48
0.00
Test 19-2
1
Idle
0
0.232
6.79
100.50
1089.9
0.42
0.558
0.00
2
25%
94
0.077
5.63
18.29
1699.9
13.60
0.625
1.51
3
55%
201
0.147
20.94
113.20
5044.2
77.58
1.894
6.17
4
25%
92
0.077
5.20
19.66
1623.0
12.74
0.622
1.48
5
10%
35
0.057
1.73
11.38
889.9
2.31
0.336
0.42
6
25%
92
0.077
5.64
19.31
1648.8
13.88
0.611
1.48
7
90%
328
0.113
29.53
600.0
5303.9
57.48
2.271
7.76
8
25%
92
0.077
5.65
22.96
1624.0
12.94
0.629
1.48
9
CT
0
0.143
90.97
30.63
466.1
0.07
0.324
0.00
IDLE
RESULTS5
Bagged Undiluted
Calc.
from Bagged Dilute
Test
19-1
HC,
ppm
-
2121
CO,
%
-
1.3
co2.
%
11.12
—
FUEL 2.2 kg/hr
D.R? 101
Test 19—2
HC, ppm - 2071
CO, % - 1.5
CO2, % 10.86 -
FUEL 2.2 kg/hr D.R.f 109
^Barometric Pressure: Test 19-1 = 746 mm Hg Test 19-2 = 744 mm Hg
eIdle Speed: Test 19-1 - 705rpm Test 19-2 = 710 rpm
fCalculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted
-------
TABLE C-7. ENGINE 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Ford 300
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Test 20-3
Test 20-4
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX
9
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Methane, g/kW-hr
Cold
14.18
108.85
938
10.14
0.364
6.35
19.59
0.57
Hot
9.26
92.71
926
11.12
0.347
6.30
19.44
0.35
Composite
9.96
95.02
928
10.98
0.349
6.31
19.46
0.38
Cold
14.89
110.08
950
10.98
0.369
6.25
19.28
0.57
Hot
9.48
93.14
940
12.44
0.352
6.27
19.34
0.38
Composite
10.25
95.56
941
12.23
0.354
6.27
19.33
0.41
Average
10.11
95.29
935
11.61
0.352
6.29
19.40
0.40
NINE MODE
IDLE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
gAW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
Test 20-3 Test 20-4 Average
POWER,
kW
9.47
44.21
1034.98
11.45
0.372
16.58
10.25
42.66
1025.61
11.95
0.376
16.79
9.86
43.44
1030.30
11.70
0.374
16.69
RPM
HC, PpmC
CO, %
co2, %
Fuel, kg/hr
Test 20-3
600
18020
3.88
9.16
2.2
Test 20-4
600
17730
3.85
9.16
2.2
Average
600
17875
3.87
9.16
2.2
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
HC,
CO,
NOX,
Methane
SFC,
WORK,
gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 10.11 (7.54) HC
gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 95.29 (71.06) CO
gAW-hr (g/hp_hr) 11.61 ( 8.66) NOX
r gAW-hr (g/hp-hr) 0.40 ( 0.30) Methane
kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.352 ( 0.579) FUEL CONS.
kW-hr (hp-hr) 6.29 ( 8.43)
g/kg Fuel
28.72
270.71
32.98
1.14
g/km
6.11
57.58
7.02
0.24
213.
a
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-7 (Cont'd).ENGINE 20 SUMMARY OP RESULTS
1972 Ford 300
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 20-3
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
36.
11.%
7.%
33.
8.%
4.%
Slope
.998
.947
.986
1.001
.973
1.000
Corr. Coef.
.9982
.8915
.9586
.9985
.9491
.9781
Intercept
10.
5.9
1.1
10.
2.6
0.1
Points Used
1144
1090
1090
1144
1113
1113
kW-hr Dev.*5
+0 Q ...
r J « J
TEST 20-4
Standard Error
36.
13.%
8.%
35.
8.%
5.%
Slope
1.000
.919
.976
.999
.962
.996
Corr. Coef.
.9982
.8649
.9518
.9983
.9457
.9785
Intercept
10.
7.2
1.2
15.
3.1
0.2
Points Used
1144
1090
1090
1144
1123
1123
kW-hr Dev.^
+3.2
+3.4
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 20-3
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
46.73
17.78
14.96
10.62
17.45
14.47
14.87
11.56
CO, gram
149.91
124.83
328.67
87.99
73.35
100.42
327.13
83.11
CC>2 f gram
738.6
1298.5
3301.8
619.2
648.3
1262.9
3289.2
631.5
NOX, gram
3.49
13.11
42.98
4.81
5.02
14.74
45.14
5.17
FUEL, kg
0.354
0.489
1.219
0.249
0.258
0.462
1.214
0.252
KW-HR
0.61
1.23
3.94
0.57
0.56
1.24
3.93
0.56
TEST 20-4
HC, gram
51.19
17.90
15.36
8.68
19.12
13.58
15.73
10.97
CO, gram
141.86
127.60
327.31
91.72
72.53
102.75
324.53
84.12
C02, gram
678.3
1309.4
3355.4
595.9
649.0
1278.5
3348.4
615.1
NOX, gram
3.43
13.69
46.62
4.91
5.13
15.18
52.38
5.29
FUEL, kg
0.335
0.494
1.235
0.242
0.260
0.468
1.232
0.247
KW-HR
0.55
1.21
3.93
0.56
0.55
1.22
3.94
0.56
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 20-3 = 741 mm Hg Test 20-4 = 744 mm Hg -
-------
TABLE C-7 (Cont'd) .ENGINE 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Ford 300
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1972 Ford 300 CID No. F60BCN42126
Carburetor: 1 barrel Motorcraft No. D2TZ-9510-AA Replacement Kit
Distributor: Rebuilt Unit No. C9TZ-12127-FRM (C6TF-12127-AG on unit)
Rated Power: 165 hp @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque: 294 ft/lb @ 2000
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec.
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM N.A.
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM N.A.
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.) 75% of High
Idle RPM 600
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @ Temp. - 73°F Baro. - 29.28"Hg
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
-
_
1100
220
2100
215
3100
196
4100
-
-
-
1200
220
2200
215
3200
192
4200
-
-
-
1300
218
2300
213
3300
187
4300
-
400
155
1400
217 .
2400
212
3400
182
4400
-
500
185
1500
218
2500
210
3500
175
4500
-
600
194
1600
216
2600
208
3600
170
4600
-
700
192
1700
215
2700
207
3700
162
4700
-
800
204
1800
215
2800
204
3800
153
4800
-
900
209
1900
215
2900
203
3900
145
4900
-
1000
218
2000
215
3000
199
4000
135
5000
-
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1972 Ford .600 Flat-bed Truck
Transmission: Manual GVW: 16,000
Measured
220 @ 1200
118 @ 3400
115-135(125)
600
-------
TABLE O7 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1972 Ford 300
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTSd
Test
20-3
Torque
N.m
Weighting
Factor
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
5 Power
HC
CO
C02
NOx
kg/hr
kVi
1
Idle
0
0.232
41.37
176.53
757.81
0.14
0.364
0.00
2
25%
75
0.077
4.23
10.71
1477.75
13.73
0.491
1.20
3
55%
165
0.147
10.18
29.14
4611.45
75.99
1.581
5.09
4
25%
75
0.077
4.27
11.66
1434.33
14.47
0.484
1.19
5
10%
30
0-057
4.10
8.61
774.43
3.25
0.261
0.36
6
25%
75
0.077
4.72
11.65
1412.06
14.36
0.484
1.20
7
90%
268
0.113
14.60
449.43
4883.23
54.58
1.857
6.35
8
25%
75
0.077
3.91
11.02
1467.87
13.15
0.484
1.19
9
CT
0
0.143
69.64
24.44
397.60
0.26
0.223
0.00
Test
20-4
1
Idle
0
0.232
44.88
178.59
681.52
0.33
0.458
0.00
2
25%
75
0.077
4.28
10.18
1523.49
18.57
0.512
1.20
3
55%
165
0.147
9.88
28.95
4538.95
76.81
1.518
5.09
4
25%
75
0.077
3.96
10.93
1452.99
14.48
0.484
1.20
5
10%
47
0.057
3.45
8.85
810.40
3.49
0.261
0.57
6
25%
75
0.077
4.23
11.01
1444.77
18.61
0.484
1.20
7
90%
268
0.113
13.86
427.52
4884.72
53.36
1.827
6.35
8
25%
73
0.077
3.95
11.23
1516.28
15.01
0.484
1.18
9
CT
0
0.143
83.54
29.02
370.31
0.00
0.283
0.00
IDLE RESULTSe
Test 20-3
HC,
CO,
co2,
ppm
%
%
Bagged Undiluted
9.13
FUEL 2.2 kg/hr
Calc. from Bagged Dilute
18020.
3.88
D.R.f 143
Test
HC,
CO,
CO2,
20-4
ppm
%
%
9.16
FUEL 2.2 kg/hr
17730.
3.85
D.R.f 143
dBarometric Pressure: Test 20-3 = 739 mm Hg Test 20-4 = 744 mm Hg
eIdle Speed: Test 20-3 600 rpmTest 20-4 600 rpm
^Calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-8. ENGINE 21 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 IHC 304
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Test 21-1
Test 21-2
Cold
Hot
ComDosite
Cold
Hot Composite
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
6.52
5.19
5.38
7.78
5.14 5.52
5.45
CO,
g/kW-hr
127.40
115.44
117.15
123.77
110.50 112.40
114.78
C02,
g/kW-hr
960.
939.
942.
959.
921. 926.
934.
NOX
t
g/kW-hr
7.50
7.76
7.72
8.03
8.16 8.14
7.93
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0. 372
0.358
0.360
0.371
0.350 0.353
0.357
WORK,
kW-hr
7. 34
7.43
7.42
7.49
7.52 7.52
7.47
POWER
kW
22.64
22.92
22.88
23.11
23.20 23.19
23.04
Methane, gAW-hr
0.43
0.32
0.34
0.44
0.31 0.33
0.34
NINE
MODE
IDLE
Test 21-1
Test 21-2
Average
Test21-1 Test pi_?
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
9.43
10.18
9.18
RPM
695 705
700
CO,
g/kW-hr
77. 39
73.37
75.38
HC, ppmC
1376 1785
1581
co2,
g/kW-hr
986.7
1000.5
993.6
CO, %
0.19 0.33
0.26
NOX,
g/kW-hr
8. 70
8.86
8.78
C02, %
11.19 13.68
12.44
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0. 397
0.412
0.405
Fuel, kg/hr
2.3 2.2
2.3
POWER, kW
18.11
17.83
17.97
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
NOX, gAW-hr (g/hp-hr)
Methane, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
SPC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
a Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
5.45 (4.06) HC 15.27 3.91
114.78 (85.59) CO 321.51 82.36
7.93 (5.91) NOX 22.21 5.69
0.34 (0.25) Methane 0.95 0.24
0.357 (0.587) FUEL CONS. - 256.
7.47 (10.02)
-------
TABLE C-8 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 21 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 IHC 304
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 21-1
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.fa
TEST
21-2
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.'3
Speed
94.
.993
.9906
7.
1144
62.
.995
.9959
20.
1144
Cold Cycle
Torque
9.%
.960
.9385
4.3
1144
— 1.9
.968
.9530
6.4
1130
• 3.8
Power
7.%
.993
.9608
.8
1144
7.%
.996
.9743
1.6
1130
Speed
60.
.984
.9960
33.
1144
65.
.985
.9954
40.
1144
Hot Cycle
Torque
8.%
.952
.9492
6.4
1144
— 3.1
8. %
.949
.9457
7.4
1141
• 4.2
Power
8. %
.992
.9614
1.1
1144
7.%
.990
.9747
1.6
1141
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 21-1
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2/ gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
TEST 21-2
HC, gram
CO, gram
C02/ gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
NYNF
15.65
119.61
960.
4.07
0.378
0.57
24.89
146.97
951.
4.17
0. 397
0.59
LANF
8.01
135.56
1618.
11.92
0.585
1.42
9.10
129.83
1645.
13.27
0.592
1.48
LAF
19.63
598.13
3689.
35.30
1.479
4.71
19.50
570.15
3772.
38.34
1.491
4. 74
NYNF
4.57
82.37
780.
3.81
0.291
0.65
4.74
79.70
811.1
4. 32
0. 300
0.68
NYNF
6.67
61.52
821.
4.14
0.296
0.59
6. 55
63.81
815.1
4. 32
0. 295
0.61
LANF
7.47
117.31
1567.
12.79
0.560
1.47
8.00
115.20
1555.2
13.92
0.555
1.50
LAF
19.25
596.68
3769.
36.59
1.503
4.71
19.56
572.97
3732.1
38.76
1.480
4.74
NYNF
5.22
82.74
823.
4.17
0.306
0.66
4.53
78.66
819.4
4. 32
0.
0.1
bTest kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 21-1 = 751 mm Hg Test 21-2 = 754 mm Hg •
-------
TABLE C-8 (Cont'd). ENGINE 21 SUMMARY
19 74 IHC 304
OF
RESULTS
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1973 International Harvester 304
Carburetor: Holley 2-barrel No. 427908C9
Distributor: IHC No. 428095C91
Rated Power: 147 hp @ 3900 rpm
Maximum Torque: 240 ft/lb @ 2400 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec.
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM N.A.
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM N.A.
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.)
Idle RPM 700
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @ Temp. - Baro. -
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
—
_
1100
199
2100
229
3100
212
4100
165
-
-
1200
206
2200
2 30
3200
20 7
4200
160
-
-
1300
212
2300
2 30
3300
202
4300
156
—
-
1400
221
2400
2 30
3400
198
4400
0
500
173
1500
223
2500
230
3500
19 3
4500
-
600
179
1600
225
2600
229
3600
190
4600
-
700
184
1700
228
2700
227
3700
183
4700
-
800
186
1800
229
2800
224
3800
179
4800
-
900
185
1900
229
2900
222
3900
174
4900
-
1000
193
2000
230
3000
217
4000
170
5000
—
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
Measured
2 30 @ 2400
128 @ 3900
125-135(130)
700
No Vehicle
-------
TABLE C-8 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 21 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 IHC 304
NINE-MODE MODAL RESULTS'3
Test21-1
Torque
N.m
Weighting
Factor
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Weighted Fuel
& Power
HC
CO
CO 2
NO*
kg/hr
kW
1 Idle
0
0.232
5.60
19. 88
1336.3
0.70
0.495
0.00
2 25%
83
0.077
6.73
66.56
1531.3
10.82
0.559
1.33
3 55%
179
0.147
19.23
106.95
4583.0
76.19
1.627
5.50
4 25%
81
0.077
6.59
70.82
1476.6
10.83
0.576
1.31
5 10%
33
0.057
2.12
23.15
836.3
2.46
0.313
0.39
6 25%
83
0.077
7.14
68.31
1521.2
11.76
0.587
1. 33
7 90%
293
0.113
30.80
949.06
4522.3
34.05
2.178
6.94
8 25%
81
0.077
6.59
76. 30
1478.9
10.73
0.559
1.31
9 CT
0
0.143
85.94
21.42
593.7
0.26
0.305
0.00
Test21-2
1 Idle
0
0.232
5.18
14. 34
1285.4
0.75
0.516
0.00
2 25%
80
0.077
6.24
57.49
1502.8
10.93
0.562
1.29
3 55%
176
0.147
19.51
108.33
4605.6
75.39
1.727
5.43
4 25%
80
0.077
6.13
59.50
1487.1
10.84
0.576
1.29
5 10%
34
0.057
1.95
19.57
846.9
2.46
0.328
0.40
6 25%
80
0.077
6.35
56.38
1487.3
11.33
0.576
1.29
7 90%
289
0.113
29.57
903.61
4533.9
35.19
2.122
6. 84
8 25%
80
0.077
6.14
61.50
1493.9
10.78
0.594
1.29
9 CT
0
0.143
100.40
27.49
595.3
0.30
0. 344
0.00
IDLE RESULTSe
Test 21-1
HC,
CO,
co2,
ppm
%
%
Bagged Undiluted
11.19
Fuel 2.3 kg/hr
Calc. from Bagged Dilute
1376
0.19
D.R.f 86
Test 21-2
HC, ppm - 1785
CO, % ~ °-33
C02/ * 13.68
Fuel 2.2 kg/hr D.R.f 105
^Barometric Pressure: Test 21-1 = mmHg Test 21-2 = 751 mmHg
e Idle Speed: Test 21-1=695 rpm Test 21-2=705 rpm
fCalculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABLE C-9. ENGINE 22 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366 a
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 22-3
TEST 22-4
Cold
Hot
Composite
Cold
Hot
Composite
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
10.23
7.36
7.77
11.56
7.22
7.84
7.81
CO,
g/kW-hr
191.38
173.09
175.70
195.17
170.84
174.32
175.01
CO2,
g/kW-hr
982.
949.
954.
102 3.
1013.
1014.
984.
NOX,
g/kW-hr
6.48
6.26
6.29
6.62
6.55
6.56
6.43
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0.414
0.392
0.395
0.431
0.411
0.414
0.405
WORK,
kW-hr
8.14
8.17
8.17
8.11
8.16
8.15
8.16
POWER, kW
25.11
25.20
25.19
25.02
25.17
25.15
25.17
Methane, g/kW-hr
0.79
0.56
0.59
0.81
0.58
0.61
0.60
NINE
MODE
IDLE
Test 22-2
Test 22-3
Average
Test 22-!
2 Test 22-3
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
8.60
8.53
8.57
RPM
525
535
530
CO,
g/kW-hr
132.77
130.59
131.68
HC, ppmC
4940
4940
4940
co2,
g/kW-hr
1010.3
1005.6
1008.0
CO, %
1.87
1.87
1.87
NOX,
gAW-hr
5.60
5.67
5.64
C02, %
11.66
11.66
11.66
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0. 395
0.398
0.397
Fuel, kg/hr
1.6
1.8
1.7
POWER, kW
21.5
21.6
21.6
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVEPAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel g/kmD
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
7.81
(5.82)
HC
19.28
6.12
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
175.01
(130.51)
CO
432.1
137.18
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
6.43
(4.79)
NOX
15.88
5.04
Methane g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
0.60
(0.45)
Methane
1.48
0.47
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
0.405
(0.666)
FUEL CONS.
—
317.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
8.16
(10.94)
a Was previously tested as Engine 11
k Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE C-9 (Cont'd).ENGINE 22 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 CMC 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
TEST 22-3
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef-
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.c
TEST 22-4
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dgv.c
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
Speed
SI.
.978
.9921
41.
1144
93.
.979
.9918
31.
1144
Torque
8.%
.929
.9421
8.9
1136
- -5.3
9.%
.929
.9263
9.0
1134
- -5.6
Power
6. %
.974
.9806
1.4
1136
6.%
.976
.9738
1.2
1134
Speed
98.
.974
.9909
50.
1144
95.
.977
.9915
39.
1144
Torque
8.%
.902
.9337
11.0
1144
-4.9
9.%
.886
.9198
13.8
1144
-5.0
Power
6. %
.964
.9794
1.5
1144
6.%
.958
.9754
1.8
1144
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS^
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 22-3
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
25.64
18.83
30.95
7.89
8.41
14.48
30.45
CO, gram
210.14
230.28
1003.74
114.08
111.22
205.96
995.04
CO2, gram
964.8
1872.3
4336.2
819.1
854.7
1739.1
4332.2
NOX, gram
4.37
12.31
32.13
3.98
3.58
11.39
32.30
FUEL, kg
0.434
0.723
1.895
0.323
0.333
0.665
1.889
KW-HR
0.63
1.61
5.26
0.64
0.66
1.60
5.27
TEST 22-4
HC, gram
35.85
19.66
32.04
6.25
7.26
14.78
30.09
CO, gram
221.29
223.07
1033.70
105.40
106.38
189.10
990.51
CO2, gram
1002.6
1919.3
4502.8
872.0
894.9
1869.3
4588.6
NOX, gram
4.95
13.59
30.94
4.25
3.98
12.66
32.09
FUEL, kg
0.462
0.735
1.964
0.333
0.342
0.698
1.967
KW-HR
0.62
1.57
5.28
0.63
0.63
1.59
5.28
NYNF
6.82
102.18
826.0
3.90
0. 318
0.64
6.83
108.75
915.0
4.78
0.349
0.66
cTest kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
^Barometric Pressure: Test 22-3 = 735 mm Hg Test 22-4 = 743 mm Hg •
-------
TABLE C-9 (ont'd). ENGINE 22 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1973 GMC 366 V-8 No. T0818T0A
Carburetor: Hoiley 4-barrel #685981
Distributor: Delco-Remy No. 1111365
Rated Power:200 hp @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque: 310 ft/lb § 2800 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec.
Measured
n
i
u>
oo
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Cylinder Compression, pse min.-max.
Idle RPM
Comments:
(avg.)
N.A.
N.A.
75% of High
550
286 @ 2700
178 @ 4000
115-123(125)
550
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. -
Baro ¦
RPM
¦TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
—
—
1100
• 221
2100
281
3100
285
4100
-
-
1200
228
2200
282
3200
281
4200
-
-
1300
237
2300
284
3300
285
4300
400
210
1400
239
2400
285
3400
270
4400
500
221
1500
246
2500
286
3500
263
4500
600
223
1600
254
2600
286
3600
255
4600
700
214
1700
262
2700
286
3700
253
4700
800
212
1800
270
2800
285
3800
245
4800
900
212
1900
274
2900
284
3900
238
4900
1000
216
2000
281
3000
289
4000
234
5000
TQ
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
1973 GMC Van
Transmission:
Manual
GVW: 19,000-24,000
-------
TABLE C-9 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 22 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366
0
1
NINE-
-MODE
MODAL RESULTS3
Torque Weighting
Weighted Emissions,
grams/hour
Test
N.m
Factor
HC
CO
CO2 NOx
1
Idle
0
0.232
13.17
84.55
947.7 0.31
2
25%
99
0.077
6 .19
91.94
2056.8 8.45
3
55%
210
0.147
19.18
164.58
6071.7 64.05
4
25%
96
0.077
6.36
113.97
1998.9 7.56
5
10%
39
0.057
1.61
35.31
1178.7 2.26
6
25%
99
0.077
6.39
106.94
2020.7 8.21
7
90%
348
0.113
50.63
2089.70
5105.3 21.30
8
25%
96
0.077
6. 55
115.97
1998.4 8.16
9
CT
0
0.143
74.56
48.44
319.5 0.15
Test
1
Idle
0
0.232
11.44
83.72
926.2 0.39
2
25-6
98
0.077
6.01
93.89
2027.5 8.50
3
55%
216
0.147
18.96
172.84
6142.1 65.62
4
25%
102
0.077
6.63
102.75
2028.6 9.11
5
10%
41
0.057
1.41
33.84
1163.7 2.13
6
25%
95
0.077
6.02
98.05
2015.9 8.14
7
90%
346
0.113
47.88
2053.34
5069.4 20.39
S
25%
98
0.077
7.13
121.10
2001.3 8.01
9
CT
0
0.143
79.02
63.58
363.8 0.19
IDLE
RESULTS£
Bagged Undiluted
Calc.
from Bagged Dilute
Test
22-2
HC,
ppm
—
4940
CO,
%
—
1.87
co2,
%
11.66
—
Fuel 1.6 lg.hr
130 D.R.9
Test
22-3
HC,
ppm
—
4940
CO,
%
—
1.87
C02,
%
11.66
Fuel 1.8 kg/hr
130 D.R.g
eBarometric Pressure: Test 22-2 = 737 mmHg
Test 22-3 = 733 mmHg
Weighted Fuel & Power
kg/hr
0.316
0.699
2.034
0.692
0.401
0.702
2.768
0.699
0.175
0.389
0.706
2.087
0.709
0.388
0.699
2.717
0.727
0.182
kW
0.00
1.59
6.48
1.55
0.47
1.59
8.25
1.55
0.00
0.00
1.57
6.64
1.64
0.49
1.53
8.18
1.57
0.00
fldle Speed: Test 22-2=525 rpm Test 22-3=535 rpm
^calculated Dilution Ratio based on carbon dioxide values minus background
for Dilute and Undiluted.
-------
TABIiE C-10. ENGINE 11 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 11-6
TEST 11-8
HC,
CO,
CO2 ,
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Cold
15.73
273.58
928.
3.36
0.444
8.06
24.87
Hot
13.89
226.41
919.
3.62
0.416
8.03
24.77
Composite
14.15
233.15
920.
3.58
0.420
8.03
23.78
Cold
20.48
252.37
999.
4. 31
0.461
8.05
24.83
Hot
15.00
223.89
898.
3.64
0.409
8.01
24.71
Composite
15.78
227.96
912.
3.74
0.416
8.02
24.73
Average
14.97
230.56
916.
3.66
0.418
8.02
24.76
NINE MODE
Test ll-l Test 11-2 Average
IDLE
Test
Test
Average
HC,
CO,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
NOX, g/kW-hr
SFC, kg/kW-hr
POWER, kW
15.39
183.04
5.43
0.440
14.06
188.74
5.56
0.435
14.73
185.89
5.50
0.438
RPM
HC, ppmC
CO, %
C02, %
Fuel, kg/hr
N.A.
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel
g/km°
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
S FC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr)
14.97
230.56
3.66
(11.16)
(171.93)
(2.73)
0.418 (0.687)
8.02 (10.71)
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL CONS,
35.81
551.58
8.76
11.53
177.63
2.82
322.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABIE C-10 (Cont'd). ENGINE 11 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 11-6
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
46.
11.%
8.%
52.
8. %
7.%
Slope
1.007
.910
.975
1.003
.949
.981
Corr. Coef.
.9977
.8886
.9625
.9970
.9386
.9702
Intercept
23.
12.9
2.9
37.
7.1
2.1
Points Used
1144
1119
1119
1144
1138
1138
kW-hr Dev.c
TEST 11-8
Standard Error
52.
9.%
8.%
45.
7.%
6. %
Slope
1.004
.932
.963
1.008
.948
.972
Corr. Coef.
.9970
.9214
.9699
.99 77
.9572
.9755
Intercept
11.
9.8
2.7
11.
5.9
1.9
Points Used
1144
1117
1117
1144
1138
1138
kW-hr Dev.c
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTSC
Test 11-6
HC, gram
CO, gram
CO2/ gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
TEST 11-8
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
HC,
CO,
CO-,
gram
gram
gram
NOX, gram
FUEL, kg
KW-HR
NYNF
55.21
439.27
872.2
2.36
0.548
0.70
65.95
292.80
975.6
3.37
0.519
0.70
LANF
31.33
323.66
1809.1
9.52
0.762
1.56
40.75
335.28
1896.4
10.17
0.805
1.59
LAF
27.62
1257.28
3932.4
12.61
1.890
5.11
35.71
1225.56
4273.4
18.47
1.990
5.07
NYNF
12.67
185.18
869.0
2.61
0.378
0. 70
22. 34
176.98
895.6
2.66
0.392
0.69
NYNF
32.22
147.38
799.8
2.95
0.357
0.67
35.90
145.84
819.5
3.03
0.366
0.67
LANF
27.13
291.79
1723.2
9.11
0.715
1.56
30.66
280.55
1699.7
9.22
0.705
1.57
LAF
32.31
1206.08
3999.6
14. 39
1.891
5.11
32.61
1185.33
3796.7
14.01
1.817
5.08
NYNF
19.90
173.14
854.3
2.66
0.375
0.70
20.99
181.37
874.6
2.85
0.387
0.69
Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
^Barometric Pressure: Test 11-6 = 742 nan Hg Testll-8 = 735 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE C-10 (Cont'd). ENGINE 11 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1973 GMC 366
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1973 General Motors 366 CID No. T0818T0A
Carburetor: Holley 4-barrel No. 685981
Distributor: Delco-Remy No. 1111365
Rated Power: 200 hp @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque: 310 ft/lbs § 2800 rpm
Comments:
ENGINE DATA
Mfg. Spec.
Measured
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM 310 @ 2800
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM 200 @ 4000
Cylinder Compression, psi min.-max. (avg.)
Idle RPM 550
Comments: Rated Power and Maximum Torque are not applicable.
273 @ 2100
161 @ 3700
125-146(132)
550
POWER MAPPING (TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. - 74
Baro. - 29.08
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
211
2100
273
3100
248
4100
-
1200
219
2200
271
3200
247
4200
-
1300
230
2300
267
3300
242
4300
400
216
1400
235
2400
268
3400
239
4400
500
212
1500
245
2500
264
3500
238
4500
600
206
1600
255
2600
263
3600
2 34
4600
700
190
1700
260
2700
260
3700
229
4700
800
193
1800
266
2800
254
3800
221
4800
900
199
1900
269
2900
256
3900
123
4900
1000
202
2000
273
3000
253
4000
0
5000
-------
APPENDIX D
N0X BASELINE DATA COMPUTER PRINTOUTS
Table Engine
Number Number Description
D-l 14 1972 Ford 361
D-2 15 1973 Dodge 413
D-3 16 1973 Chevrolet 454
D-4 17 1973 GMC 427
D-5 18 1972 Chevrolet 350
D-6 19 1972 IHC 345
D-7 20 1972 Ford 300
D-8 21 1973 IHC 304
D-9 22 1973 GMC 366
D-10 lla 1973 GMC 366
a
Engine 11 was retested as Engine 22.
-------
TABLE D-1A. TEST 14-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-50**-
engine no.
TEST N0.1*-2 RUN
engine model 72 ford 3bi
DATE B/17/79
ENGINE 5.9 L(3bl CIO)
TIME 09!39
GASOLINE EM-gb7
-F
CVS NO. S
DYNO NO. ?
BAG CART NO.
2
BAROMETER 7*3.*b MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
b8 PCT
Dry BUL9 TEMP. 21.7 DEG C(7l.O OEG F)
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
11.3 GM/KG( 7B.8
GRAINS/LB) NOX
HUMIDITY C.F. 1.01:
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
*
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
MYNF
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. HsO)
b9b.O (27.*)
711.8 (28.0)
7b2.0 (30.0)
708.7 (27.9)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
*57.2 (1B.0)
*72.* (lB.b)
5*1.0 (21.3)
*b*.8 (18.3)
BLONER INLET TE^P. DEG. C(DEG. F)
s*.* (i*n.o)
5*.* (130.0)
5*.* (130.0)
5*.* (130.n)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
71b*
808*
831b
7190
TIME SECONDS
272.0
30b.9
31b. 0
273.0
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
182.b ( b*51)
205.7 ( 72bb)
210.0 ( 7*18)
183.1 ( b*b8)
HC SAMpLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
59.1/ 3/ 591
*9.0/ 3/ *90
37.0/ 3/ 370
2*.*/ 3/ 2**
HC 9CKGR0 METER/RANGE/PPM
3.b/ 3/ 3b
5.*/ 3/ 5*
S.l/ 3/ 51
*.8/ 3/ *8
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
3B.8/ 3/ 1125
b3.b/ 3/ 1820
bb.b/ 2/ *285
3*.1/ 3/ 9qo
CO BCKGRD M&TEft/RANGE/PPM
1.0/ 3/ 29
.*/ 3/ U
.7/ 2/ *2
1.0/ 3/ 2S
CO? SIMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
19.5/ 3/ .30
29.7/ 3/ .*8
b3.2/ 3/ 1.10
17.5/ 3/ .2?
M C02 SCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
3.2/ 3/ .05
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
2.9/ 3/ .0*
3.*/ 3/ .05
Y NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
12.B/ 2/ 13
25.9/ 2/ 2b
b* . 9/ 2/ b5
12.*/ 2/ 12
W NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
.*/ 2/ 0
.5/ 2/ 1
.8/2/ 1
1.0/ 2/ 1
DILUTION FACTOR
hc concentration ppm
co concentration ppm
CO? concentration pct
nox concentration ppm
28.*5
55b
lot. 7
.2b
12.*
19.13
*39
1753
25. *
8.b5
325
*Ob*
l.Ob
b*.2
3*.31
197
93b
.22
11.*
HC MASS GRAMS
58. bO
52.07
39.35
20.85
CO MASS GRAMS
22b.91
*20.00
993.80
199.b3
CO? MASS GRAMS
8b0. 3
1591.0
*091.8
7*2.2
NOX MASS GRAMS
*.*2
10.19
2b. 25
*.08
FUEL KG (LB)
.**2
(
.97)
. 7b2
(
l.bB)
1.822
(
*.D2)
.35*
(
.78)
KW HR (HP HR)
.bO
(
.81)
1.H3
(
1.92)
* . 8b
(
b.52)
.bl
(
.82)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
rh
•
r*
cr
(
72.bb)
3b. *b
(
27.19)
8.09
(
b.fl3)
3*.2*
(
25.53)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
377.32
(
281.37)
29*.nb
(
219.28)
20*.3*
(
152.37)
327.8b
(
2+*,*9)
BSC02 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
1*30.b3
(10bb.82)
1113.91
(
830.bS)
8*1,31
I
b27.3b)
1218.93
(
90R.95)
BSNOX G/Krf HR (G/Hp HR)
7.3*
(
5.*7)
7.13
(
5.32)
5.*0
(
*.03)
b . b 9
(
*.99)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.735
(
1.209)
.533
(
.877)
.375
I
.bib)
.581
(
.955)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW Hr (HP HR)
BSHC G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC0 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/K« HR (G/HP HR)
BSHOX G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
B9FC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
7.50 ( 10.0b)
22.78 ( lb.10)
8*5.31 (182.93)
971 ( 72*)
S.«M> ( ».*7)
.~50 ( .7*0)
PARTICULATE DATa» TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
?0 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE n.OW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.000 ( 0.000)
ri.noo ( o.ooo).
o.oo ( o.n)
-------
TABLE D-1A (CONT'D). TEST M-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
engine no.
engine model 72 ford 31,1
ENGINE 5.9 L(3bl CID)
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*3.*b MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
DRV BUL9 TEMP, 83.3 DEG C(7*.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MX. H?0(IN. HaO)
blower INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOkER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECOMOS
TOTAL FLOH STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMpLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 3CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGfiO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? 9CKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NO* SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
d, NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COP CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KM HR (HP HR)
BgHC G/KN Hr (G/HP Hr)
8SC0 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KN HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR>
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP Hr)
BSC02 G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
7.SS ( 10.12)
12.9* ( 9.bS)
203.35 (151.b*)
990 ( 738)
b.82 ( 5.OR)
.*2b ( .700)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. U-S0**-001
TEST NO.14-2 RUN
DATE 8/17/79
TIME 10:19 GASOLINE EM-ab?-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY t>* »CT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.8 GM/KG( B2.5 GRAlNS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.03b*
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (IB.O)
5*.* (130.0)
7lb3
272.0
182.b ( b*50)
23.5/ 3/ 235
*.5/ 3/ *5
31.2/ 3/ 10b
.9/ 3/ 2b
18.9/ 3/ .29
5.2/ 3/ .08
12.2/ 2/ 12
.8/ ?/ 1
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
808*
307.0
205.7 ( 7?bb)
27.0/ 3/ 270
*.3/ 3/ *3
*2»B/ 3/ 1239
.9/ 3/ 2b
21.*/ 3/ .*7
*.b/ 3/ .07
32.8/ 2/ 33
.8/ 2/ 1
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
831b
31b.0
210.0 ( 7*18)
31.*/ 3/ 31*
*.*/ 3/ **
59.*/ 2/ 3818
.*/ 2/ 2*
bb.l/ 3/ 1.1b
*,5/ 3/ .07
73.7/ 2/ 7*
.9/ 2/ 1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
7188
273.0
183.1 ( b*bb)
20.2/ 3/ 202
*.2/ 3/ *2
30.7/ 3/ 892
.b/ 3/ 17
22.0/ 3/ .3*
3.b/ 3/ .(IS
11.9/ 2/ 12
1.1/ 2/ 1
33.13
191
858
.22
II.*
21.71
229
1178
.*1
32.0
8. bl
275
3b33
1.10
72.9
29.71
lbl
851
.29
10.8
20.15
27.17
33.32
17.0*
182.*b
282.28
888.50
181.*9
729.*
1527.0
*23*.3
9B1.9
*.1*
13.07
30.35
3.93
.3*0
(
.75)
. b*8
(
i.*3)
1.808
(
3.99)
.*17
(
.92)
.b-2
(
.83)
l.*5
(
1.95)
*.87
C
b.53)
.bl
(
.82)
32.70
(
2*.38)
18.73
(
13.97)
b. 8*
(
5.10)
27.99
(
20.87)
29b.01
<
220.7*)
19*.57
(
1*5.09)
182.*0
(
13b.02)
298.08
(
222.27)
1183.3*
(
B82.*2)
1052.52
(
78*.8b)
8b9,27
(
b*8.21)
Ibl2.b8
(1202.S7)
b. 71
(
5.00)
9.01
(
b . 72)
b.83
(
*.bS)
b.*b
(
*.82)
.552
(
.908)
.**7
(
.735)
.371
(
• bl 0 )
. b8*
(
1.125)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
multiplier for
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FDR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
o.oon ( 0.00)
0.000
n.oon ( o.ooo)
0.000 ( 0.000)
?0 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE PLOW
SCM(SCF)
n.oo ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-1B, TEST 1H-H EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.F 3bl
ENGINE MODEL 72 FORD 3bJ.
ENGINE 5.9 L(3bl CID)
CVS NO. 9
0AROMETCR 7*0. Ib MM HG(29.1* IN HG)
Dry BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG C(73.0 OEG F)
BAG RES'JLTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLo*fER inlet temp. deg. c(DEg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
hc sample meter/range/ppm
hc bckgrd meter/range/ppm
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
„ CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
I NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/Hp Hr)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KN HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCOS G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX B/KH HA (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
7.5b ( 10.1*)
21.*0 ( 15.9b)
a«»3.*S (181.5*)
HbO C 71fe)
h.lB (
.**5 f .731)
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. 11-S0**-0<11
TEST NO. 1*-* RUN
DATE 8/S2/79
TIME 09S39 GASOLINE EM-2(,7-F
DYNO NO. B BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDIT* 12.5 Gm/KG( 87.3 GrAInS/LB) NOX HumIDITY C.F. l.tlbl*
1
2
3
*
NVNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
b9b.O (27
.»)
711.2 (28
.0)
7b?.0 (30.0)
708.7 (27
.9)
*57.2 (IB
.0)
*72.* (IB
.b)
5*1.0 (21.3)
*b*.8 (IB
.3)
5*.* (1311.0)
5*.* (130.0)
5*.* (130.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71bl
8082
8315
718b
272.0
30b.9
315.9
273.0
181.7 (
b*lB)
20*.7 (
7230)
209.0 ( 7382)
182.2 (
b*3*:
*8.0/ 3/
*80
*3.8/ 3/
*38
3b.0/ 3/ 3bO
27.1/ 3/
271
2.2/ 3/
22
3.0/ 3/
30
3.1/ 3/ 31
3.1/ 3/
31
37.2/ 3/
1079
b*.0/ 3/
1831
b7.*/ 2/ *33b
37.3/ 3/
10B2
.9/ 3/
2b
1.2/ 3/
3*
,b/ 2/ 3b
2.b/ 3/
75
19.8/ 3/
.31
29.5/ 3/
.*7
b*.7/ 3/ 1.13
18.*/ 3/
.28
3.8/ 3/
.ob
*.0/ 3/
.Ob
*.*/ 3/ .Ob
*.3/ 3/
.Ob
12.3/ 2/
12
25.*/ 2/
25
b*.1/ 2/ b*
12.9/ ?/
13
.3/ 2/
0
0.0/ 2/
0
.2/ 2/ 0
.5/ 2/
1
29.11
19.3*
B . *7
32.15
*59
*10
333
2*1
in?*
17*1
*113
981
.25
.*2
1.07
• .22
12.n
25.*
b3.S
12.*
*8.OR
*8.3b
*0.10
25.32
21b.72
*15.1*
1001.05
208.1*
8*3.B
1559.3
*111.7
?**. 2
*.*3
10.5b
27.12
*.59
.*21
(
.93)
, ?*b
(
l.b*)
1.832
c
*.0*)
. 3b 3
(
.80)
.bl
(
.82)
1.**
(
1.93)
*.89
(
b.55)
. b 3
(
.85)
78.9b
(
58.88)
33. b8
(
25.12)
8.21
(
b. 12)
*0.10
(
29.90)
355.93
(
2b5.*2)
289.1*
(
215.bl)
20*.88
(
152.78)
329.b3
(
2*5.81)
1385.*5
(1033.13)
lOBb.Ob
(
809.87)
8*1.50
c
b27.5o)
1178.b3
(
878.90)
7.28
(
5.*3)
7.35
(
5.*8)
5.55
(
*.1*)
7.27
(
5.*2)
• b92
(
1.138)
.519
(
.85*)
.375
(
.bib)
.575
(
.9*5)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
.992 ( 0.00)
1.132
.089 ( .Ob7)
.310 ( .1*1)
90 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCMtSCF)
n.oa ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-1B (CONT'D). TEST lMl EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. ll-50**-0fll
ENGINE NO.F 3bl
ENGINE MODEL 72 FORD 3bl
ENGINE 5.1 L(3bl CID)
CVS NO. 1
barometer 7*0.ik mm hg(2i.i* in hg)
DPY BUlB TEMP. 83.3 DEG C(7*.0 DEG F)
bag results
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIE P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
BLOMER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
bloker inlet temp. deg. c(oeg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
TEST NO. It-*
DATE R/22/79
TIME Xnsll
dyno no. e
RUN
GASOLINE EM-2h7-F
BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY f,b PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG( 8*.1 GRAINS/LB)
NGX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0*11
1
NYNF
blb.O (?7.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* C130.0)
71b2
27?.n
181.7 c b*11)
2
LANF
711.2 (2 8.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8082
307.0
20*.7 ( 7330)
3
LAF
71.8,0 (30.0)
S*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8315
31b. 0
201,0 ( 738?)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.1)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
718b
273.0
182.3 ( b*3*)
a
i
HC
SAMPLE
meter/range/ppm
25.*/
3/
25*
28.*/
3/
289
30.0/
3/
300
22.1/
3/
221
hc
9CKGRD
meter/range/ppm
2.5/
3/
25
2.V
3/
21
3", 0/
3/
30
2.''/
3/
29
CO
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
33.3/
3/
9b7
*b.9/
3/
1355
58,5/
2/
3?b0
3*.*/
3/
999
CO
9CKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
.s/
3/
1*
1.0/
3/
29
.5/
2/
30
l.b/
3/
*b
CO?
SAMPLE
meter/range/pct
17.1/
3/
.28
28.1/
3/
."»5
51.1/
3/
1.02
17.5/
3/
.27
CO?
BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PCT
3.8/
3/
.Ob
3.1/
3/
.Ob
*.1/
3/
.Ob
*.1/
3/
.Ob
NOX
SAMPLE
M£TER/RANBE/»PM
11.9/
2/
12
30.1/
2/
31
59.b/
2/
bO
12.3/
2/
12
NOX
3CKGRD
meter/range/ppm
.1/
2/
0
.1/
2/
0
.»/
2/
0
.b/
2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
33. BS
22.0*
9.50
3*.*3
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
230
2bl
273
193
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
128
128B
3580
929
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
.22
.39
.'»?
.21
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
11.8
30.8
59.2
11.7
HC MASS GRAMS
2*.08
30.85
32.93
20.2b
CO MASS GRAMS
lib.35
307.08
871.2b
197.0*
CO? MASS GRAMS
731.n
1*72.5
3b18.b
70*.S
NOX MASS GRAMS
*.3n
12. bS
2*.85
*.28
FUFL KG (LB)
.35*
(
.78)
. b* 7
(
l.*3)
l.b30
(
3.59)
.3*0
(
.75)
KW HR (HP HR)
. b?
(
.8*)
l.*b
(
1.9b)
*.89
(
b.55)
• b3
(
.85)
BSHC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
3B.59
(
28.78)
21.lb
{
15.78)
b . 7*
(
5.03)
32.09
(
23.93)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
31*.70
(
23*.b7)
210.57
(
157.02)
178,31
C
132.97)
312.0*
(
232.b9)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
118*.50
(
BR3.28)
1009.70
(
752.93)
75b.9b
(
5b*.*7)
1115.bS
(
831.1*)
BSNOX G/KM HR CG/HP HR)
b . 10
(
5.1*)
e.bfi
(
b.*7)
5.09
(
3.79)
b. 78
(
5.0b)
B3FC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
. 5bB
(
.93*)
.***
(
.730)
.33*
(
.5*9)
.538
(
.885)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (5/HP HR)
BSCD2 G/KM HR (G/MP HR)
BSNOK G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HR)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
7.bO ( in.IS)
it.23 ( ln.bi)
20b.81,(15*.22)
870 ( b*9)
b.Ob ( *.5?)
.391 ( .h*3)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
2D X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF)
SCm(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
6/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
.992 C 0.00)
1.132
.084 ( .Ob?)
.310 ( .1*1)
O.OO ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-1C. TEST 14-6 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. U-50**-001
ENGINE NO.F 3b1
ENGINE MODEL 72 FORD 3bl
ENGINE s.q L(3bl C1D)
CVS NO. q
TEST NO.1 *"b RUN
DATE 8/27/79
TIME OBJ59
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE EM-287-F
BAG CART NO. 2
barometer 7*1.17 mm HG09.18 in hg)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
b3 PCT
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG CC73.0 OEG F)
ABSOLUTE
HUMIDITY
11.1 GM/KG<
77.7 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
1.0127
Bag RESULTS
bag number
1
2
3
*
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
9)
BLOWER DIF P mm. HeO(IN. H?0)
b9b.O (27.
*)
711.2 (28.
0)
7(>2.0 (30.
0)
708.7 (27.
BLOWER inlet P MM. H20(IN. H20)
*57.2 (18.
0)
*72.* (18.
b)
5*1.0 (21.
3)
*b*,8 (18.
3)
BLOwER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
5*.* (130
.0)
5*.* (130
.0)
5*.* (130
•
0)
5*.* (130
.0)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
71 b2
808*
8317
7188
TIME SECONDS
272.0
307.0
31b.0
273.0
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRESCSCF)
182.0 ( b*28)
205.1 C 72*3)
209.* ( 739*)
182.5 ( b**5)
HC SAMpLE METER/RAnGE/PPM
*5.*/ 3/
*5*
*1.5/ 3/
*15
33.0/ 3/
330
19.1/ 3/
191
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
2.0/ 3/
20
2.2/ 3/
22
2.t»/ 3/
2b
2.*/ 3/
2V
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
38.5/ 3/ ill?
b3.S/ 3/ 1818
b8.9/ 2/ **3*
3*.5/ 3/ 1002
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
.5/ 3/
1*
1.0/ 3/
29
.1/ 2/
b
1.2/ 3/
3*
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
18.8/ 3/
.29
27.9/ 3/
.**
b2.b/ 3/ 1
•
09
lb.9/ 3/
• 2b
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
3.5/ 3/
.05
3.3/ 3/
.05
3.2/ 3/
•
05
3.2/ 3/
.05
O NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
11.7/ 2/
12
25.*/ 2/
25
55.8/ 2/
5b
11.*/ 2/
11
cn NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
0.0/ 2/
0
0.0/ 2/
0
.3/ 2/
0
.b/ 2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
30.10
80.a*
8 . bb
35.Sb
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
*35
39*
307
lbB
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
107*
1739
*2*b
9**
C03 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2*
.to
1.05
.21
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
11.7
25.*
55.5
10.8
HC MASS GRAMS
*5.b3
*b . bl
37.07
17.bS
CO MASS GRAMS
227.b7
*15.19
1035.1*
200.55
CO? MASS GRAMS
8n*.3
1*9*.8
HOIB.O
71b.5
NOX MASS GRAMS
*.12
10.09
22.52
3.82
FUEL KG (LB)
.*12
( .91)
.78*
( l.bO)
l.Blb
c
*.00)
.3*3
( .7b)
KW HR (HP HR)
.t.e
( .8*)
l.*9
( 2.00)
* . 9b
c
b.bS)
.t>3
( .85)
BSHC G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
73.13
( 5*.53)
31.32
( 23.35)
?.*7
(
5.57)
27.95
( 20.8*)
BSCO C/KW Hr (G/Hp Hr)
3b*.90
( 272.10)
278.95
( 208.08)
208.b*
t
155.58)
317.bl
( 23b.8*)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1289.07
( 9bl.2b)
100*.31
( 7*8.91)
809.8b
(
b03.11)
113*.bS
( 8*b.11)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
b.bl
( *.93)
b . 78
( 5.0b)
*.5*
(
3.39)
b.Ob
< *.52)
BSFC KG/KN HR (LB/HP HR)
.bbO
( 1,085)
.*8b
( .799)
• 3bb
(
.b02)
.5*3
< .893)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
asco G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KW HR (6/Hp HR)
8SN0X G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/K* HR (LB/HP HR)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
7.71 C 10.33)
19.0? C 1*.22)
2*3.81 (181.Bl)
<413 ( (,81)
5.2b ( 3.93)
.«8 ( ,703)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOM SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
,b3* ( 0.00)
1.31S
.851 ( .187)
.882 ( .*00)
5b.*0 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-
ENGINE NO.F 3bl
engine model ?e ford 3bi
ENGINE 5.9 L(3bl CIO)
CVS NO, 9
BAROMETER 7*1.17 MM HGC29.18 IN HG)
ORr BuLB TEMp. 23.3 DEG C(7*.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. HjO)
BLOWER INLET P MM* H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER InLET TEmP. OEG. C(0EG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
total flow std. cu. metreb(scf)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGBO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGPD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
Vj NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
• DILUTTON FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PP«
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR tG/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW Hr (G/Hp Hr)
BSCOa G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
MFC KG/KW HR (LB'HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR) 7.bS ( 10.2b)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR) 13.85 ( 10.33)
BSCO 6/KW HR (G/HP HR) 823.17 (lbb,*2)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 9*7 ( 70b)
BSNQX G/KW HR (G/HP HR) fe.Ofe ( *.52)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .*33 ( .feqS)
(CONT'D). TEST W-6 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT MO. 11-50*9-001
TEST N0.1*-b RUN
DATE 8/27/79
TIME 09139 GASOLINE EM-287-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bl PCT
absolute humidity n.3 gm/kg( 78.8 grains/lb? nox humidity c.f. 1.0182
1
NYNF
t»9b.0 (27.1)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71b*
272.0
182.0 ( b*30)
2b.0/ 3/ 2b0
2.0/ 3/ 20
32.5/ 3/ 9**
.b/ 3/ 17
17.8/ 3/ .2?
2.b/ 3/ .0*
12.*/ 2/ 12
.3/ 2/ 0
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (IB.b)
5*.* (130.0)
808S
307.0
205.1 ( 72**)
27.b/ 3/ 27b
2.3/ 3/ 23
*7.8/ 3/ 1381
.8/ 3/ 23
28.5/ 3/ .*5
2.7/ 3/ .0*
32.9/ 2/ 33
.3/ 2/ 0
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
831b
31t>.0
201.3 ( 7393}
31.7/ 3/ 317
2.5/ 3/ 25
bb.?/ 2/ *2"U
.2/ 2/ 12
b*.0/ 3/ 1.12
2.8/ 3/ .0*
b3.1/ 2/ b3
1.3/ 2/ 1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.1)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
7188
273.0
182.S ( b**5)
17,7/ 3/ 177
3.5/ 3/ 35
3*.7/ 3/ 1008
1.*/ 3/ *0
17.*/ 3/ .27
3.2/ 3/ .05
12.*/ 2/ 12
1.7/ 2/ 2
3*.12
21.75
8.59
3*.89
2*1
25*
295
1*3
90*
1320
*10*
9**
.2*
.*?
1.08
.22
12.1
32. b
bi.O
10.7
25.2b
30.05
35.bl
15.05
191.b*
315.2*
1000,27
200.b3
792.5
15b5.1
*1**.8
7*3.7
*.29
13.03
25.2b
3.82
.370
(
.82)
.bBO
(
I.SO)
1.838
(
*.05)
.3*9
(
.77)
.b5
c
.87)
l.*7
<
1.98)
*.9*
(
b.b2)
.59
(
.80)
3^.07
(
29.1*)
20. *0
(
15.81)
7.21
<
5.38)
25.35
c
18.90)
29b.**
(
221.0b)
813.9b
(
159.55)
202.5*
I
151.03)
337.85
c
251.9*)
1225.90
(
91*.lb)
10b2.2*
(
792.15)
839.23
I
b25.82)
1252.33
(
933.8b)
b,b*
(
*.95)
8.8*
(
b. 59)
5.11
(
3.81)
b.*3
c
*.80)
.572
«
(
.9*1)
«*bl
(
.758)
.372
(
*bl3)
.587
(
• 9feb)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
multiplier for
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
.b3* ( 0.00)
1.315
.251 ( .187)
.882 C .*00)
?0 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF)" 5b.10 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-2A. TEST 15-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT MO. ll-50**-001
ENGINE NO. *13
engine mooel 73 dodge *13
ENGINE S.B L(*13 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 739.90 HH HG(29.13 IN HG)
DRY BUL9 TEMP. 23.<1 OEG 0(75.0 DEG F)
bag results
BAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER DIF P MH. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER RFVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
total flow std. cu. metresocf)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
9CKGR0
SAMPLE
9CKGRD
COS SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
do NOX 9CKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
meter/range/ppm
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
TEST NO. 15-1 RUN
DATE 9/11/79
TIME OBtIS
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE £M-Zb?-F
BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b* PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/KGC 85.3 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0511
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
S*.* (130.0)
7lbS
272*0
181.7 ( b*19)
SO.O/ 3/
l.b/ 3/
500
lb
51.V 3/ 1718
2.5/ 3/
22.5/ 3/
2. b/ 3/
9.*/ a/
.*/ 2/
72
.35
.0*
9
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
808S
307.0
20*.7 ( 7231)
2b.0/ 3/ 2b0
2.1/ 3/ 21
58.2/ 3/ lb?l
3.1/ 3/
3*.0/ 3/
2.7/ 3/
31.8/ 2/
.3/ 2/
BR
.55
.0*
32
0
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
831b
315.9 ,
208.9 ( 7380)
27.B/ 3/ 278
2.1/ 3/ 21
33.0/ 1/ *717
.3/ 1/ »0
75,*/ 3/ 1.35
3.3/ 3/ .05
80.3/ 2/ BO
.*/ 2/ 0
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*,* (130.0)
71b3
272.0
181.5 ( bill)
22.1/ 3/ 229
2.1/ 3/ 21
**.9/ 3/ 1299
3.0/ 3/
20.b/ 3/
3.7/ 3/
11.9/ 2/
.7/ 2/
8b
.32
.05
12
.1
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
23.53
*85
lbO*
.32
9.0
18.1*
2*0
1537
.51
31.5
7.33
2b0
**b*
1.31
80.0
28.51
209
1183
• 27
11.2
HC MASS GRAMS
50.81
28.3b
31.32
21.85
CO MASS GRAMS
339.*5
3bb.3*
108b.05
2*9.99
C02 MASS GRAMS
1051.5
192*.7
500b,0
891. b
NOX MASS GRAMS
3.29
12.97
33.59
*.10
FUEL KG (L«)
.550
C
1.21)
.817.
(
1.80)
2.1*7.
C
*.73)
.*27.
(
.9*)
KW HR (HP HR)
.73
(
.98)
1.71
(
2.30)
5. b3
C
7.S5)
• 72
(
.97)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
faR.bS
(
51.9b)
lb.5*
(
12.3*)
5.5b
(
*.15)
30.28
(
22.58)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
*b5.S3
(
3*7.15)
213.75
(
159.39)
192.89
(
1*3.8*)
3*b.*l
(
258.32)
BSC02 G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
1**2.00
(1075.30)
1122.97
(
837.*0)
889.11
(
bbS.Ol)
1235.55
(
921,35)
B3N0X G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
*.52
(
3.37)
7.57
(
5. b*)
5.97
(
*.*5)
5.b8
(
*.23)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.755
(
1.2*1)
.*7b
(
.783)
.381
(
• b S 7 )
.591
(
.972)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
PARTICULATE DATAr TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL K* HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
8SC0 G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 S/KW HR (G/Hp HP)
RSMOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
MFC KG/KH HR (LB/HP HR)
R.80 ( 11.79)
15.05 ( 11.22)
23?.lb (173.12)
1009 ( 752)
b.13 f ».S7)
,W ( .737)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
89 X 20 FILTERS
sample flow
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (6/LB FUEL)
8CM(8CF)
0.000 ( 0,00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-2A (CONT'D). TEST 15-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO. *13
Engine mooec 73 dodge *13
ENGINE b.8 L(»13 CIO) V-8
CVS NO, 4
barometer 734.90 mm hgcs^.ib in hg)
DRY Bl.lL3 TEMp. 2* . * DEG C(7b.O DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKSRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COR BCKSRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NO* SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
Jj NOX 3CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC 1ASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? 1ASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
Krf HR (HP HR) <
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS n BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCOS G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/Hp Hr)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
8.7* ( 11.72)
10.01 ( 7.*7)
208.95 (155.81)
454 ( 715)
7.b7 ( 5.72)
.*lb ( .b8*)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. 11-50*4-001
TEST NO. 15-1 RUN
DATE 9/11/74
TIME 04x25 GASOLINE EM-2b?-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.7 GM/KG( 81.7 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.032*
1
NYNF
b4b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71b3
272.0
1B1.7 ( b*17)
14.0/ 3/ 110
1.8/
3/
18
37.8/
3/
1047
.?/
3/
20
19.*/
3/
.30
2.8/
3/
.0*
15.9/
2/
lb
.3/
2/
0
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8085
307.0
20*.7 ( 7231)
19.8/ 3/ 192
1.8/ 3/ 18
*0.b/ 3/ 1177
1.1/ 3/ 32
31.5/ 3/ .51
3.0/ 3/ .0*
*1.1/ 2/ *1
.3/ 2/ 0
LAF
762.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
831b
31b.0
208.4
(
7380)
2b.0/
3/
2b0
1.8/
3/
18
32.*/
1/
*b27
.1/
1/
13
7*.*/
3/
1.33
3.*/
3/
.05
9b.8/
2/
97
.5/
2/
1
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71b2
272.0
181.5
(
b*10)
20.*/
3/
20*
2.0/
3/
20
*5.7/
3/
1322
1.0/
3/
24
20.1/
3/
.31
3.9/
3/
.Ob
IS.4/
2/
lb
l.V
2/
1
31.39
173
1050
.2b
15. b
20.43
175
1113
.*b
*0.8
7. *b
2**
**08
1.29
9b,*
24.02
185
12bl
• 2b •
1*.5
18.08
20.bS
24,*b
14.33
222.19
2b5.38
1072,bl
2bb.5*
8b4.0
17*2.*
*421.1
85*.3
5.bO
lb.50
39,77
5.21
.*02
(
.84)
.701
(
1.55)
2.112
(
*.bb)
.*21
(
.93)
.72
(
.47)
l.bB
(
2,25)
5,b2
(
7.5*)
.?H
(
.97)
25.0b
(
18.bS)
12.32
(
9.18)
5.2*
(
3.91)
2b.79
(
14.48)
307.90
(
224.bO)
15B.31
(
118.05)
140.7b
(
1*2.85)
3b4.3b
(
275.*3)
120*.14
(
847.4b)
1034.**
(
775.11)
875.20
(
b52.b3)
1183.8*
(
882.79)
7.7b
(
5.74)
4.8*
(
7.3*)
7.07
(
5.87)
7.23
(
5.34)
.557
(
.91b)
.*18
(
.b88)
.37b
c
• blB)
.583
(
.958)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
40MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0.0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
sample flow
SCM(SCF)
0.00 ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-2A (CONT'D). TEST 15-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO. *13
engine model 73 dodge u3
Engine i>.b L(*i3 cid) v-s
CV3 no. q
BAROMETER 731.10 MM HG(29.13 IN HG)
Dry BULB TEMP, a*.* OEG C(7b.O DEG F)
HOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 15-1 RUN
DATE 9/11/79
TIME 0U25
DYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.7 GM/KGC 81.7
PROJECT NO. 11-5D4*-001
GASOLINE EM-8b7-F
BAG CART NO. 2
GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.032*
bag results
BAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
COS BCKGRD
O NOX SAMPLE
H NOX SCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
1
NYNF
b9b.O (37.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
54.* (130.0)
71b3
272.0
181.7 ( b*17)
19.0/ 3/ ISO
1.8/ 3/ IB
37.8/ 3/ 1097
.7/ 3/ SO
19.*/ 3/ .30
2.8/ 3/ .0*
15.1/ 2/ lb
.3/ 2/ 0
2
Lanf
711.2 (2B.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8085
307.0
204.7 ( 7231)
19.2/ 3/ 192
1.8/ 3/ 18
*0.b/ 3/ 1177
1.1/ 3/ 32
31.5/ 3/ .51
3.0/ 3/ .0*
*1.1/ 2/ *1
.3/ 2/ 0
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
831b
31b.0
208.9 ( 73B0)
2b.0/ 3/ 2bO
1.8/ 3/ 18
32.*/ 1/ *b2 7
.1/ 1/ 13
7*.*/ 3/ 1.33
3.*/ 3/ .05
9b.8/ 2/ ">7
.5/ 2/ 1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71b2
272.0
181.5 ( b*10)
20.*/ 3/ 20*
2.0/ 3/ 20
*5.7/ 3/ 1322
1.0/ 3/ 29
20.1/ 3/ .31
3.9/ 3/ .Ob
15.9/ 2/ lb
1.*/ 2/ 1
dilution factor
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION pct
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
3!.39
173
1050
.2b
15. b
20.93
175
1113
.*b
*0.8
7,*b
2**
**08
1.29
9b.*
29.02
185
12bl
.2b
1*.S
HC MASS GRAMS
18.08
20. bS
29. *b
19.33
CO MASS GRAMS
222.11
2b5.38
1072.bl
2bb.5*
CO? MASS GRAMS
8b9.0
17*2.*
*921.1
85*. 3
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.bO
lb.SO
39.77
5.21
FUEL KG (LB)
.*02
(
.89)
.701
(
1,55)
2.112
(
* . bb )
.*21
(
.13)
KW HR (HP HR) >
.72
(
.97)
l.bB
(
2.25)
5 . b 2
(
7.5*)
.72
(
.97)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
25.0b
(
18.b9)
12.32
(
9.18)
5.2*
(
3.91)
2b.79
(
11.98)
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
307.90
C
229.bO)
158.31
(
118.05)
190.7b
(
1*2.25)
3b9.3b
(
275.*3)
SSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
120*.19
(
897.9b)
1039.4*;
(
775.11)
875.20
(
bS?«b3)
1183.8*
(
882.79)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
7.7b
(
5.79)
9.8*
(
7.3*)
7.07
(
5.27)
7.23
(
5.39)
RSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.557
(
.91b)
.*18
(
. b88 )
.37b
(
• bl8)
.583
(
• 95B)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR) 8.7* ( 11.72)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 10.111 ( 7.*7)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 20R.95 (155.81)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 959 ( 715)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/Hp IIR) 7.b? ( 5.72)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .*lb ( .KB*)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
multiplier for
?n x ?n filters
sample flow
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-2B. TEST 15-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO. *13
ENGINE MODEL 73 DODGE *13
ENGINE b.8 L(*13 CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 1
B4ROKFTEH 718*f12 MM HG(?1.0b IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.1 PEG C(?5.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P mm, ,H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONOS
TOTAL flow std. cu. METRESCSCF)
HC SAMPLE meter/range/ppm
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co bckgrd meter/r*nge/ppm
CO? SAMPLE meter/range/pct
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
o NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
^ NO* BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
I—¦
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COS CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HP (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW Hff (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR) 8.7b ( 11.7*)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 12.7* ( ^,53)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 231.50 (172,b3)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 102'' ( 7b7)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR) b.ll ( *,S5)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .*52 ( .7*3)
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, U-50M-001
TEST NO, 15-2 RUN
OATE 1/13/71
TIME 0St31 GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
OYNO NO, 2 BAG CART NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b3 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12,1 GM/KG( 8*,1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F, l,0*8b
1
nynf
blb.O (27,*)
*97,2 (18,0)
«*.* (130,0)
7lb5
272,0
181.3 ( b*03)
*7,7/ 3/ *77
1,2/ 3/ 12
51,2/ 3/
,R/ 3/ 8b
23,*/ 3/ .37
3,2/ 3/ ,05
10,3/ 2/ 10
.»/ 2/ 0
2
LANF
711,2 (28,0)
*72,* (IS.ii)
.5*,* (130,0)
8087
307,0
20*,2 ( 721*)
21,1/ 3/ 811
2,1/ 3/ 21
57,1/ 3/ lbb3
,2/ 3/ b
35,2/ 3/ ,57
3,b/ 3/ ,05
30,1/ 2/ 30
,2/ 2/ 0
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21,3)
5*.* (130,0)
831b
31b,0
208,* ( 73bl)
2*,*/ 3/ 2**
1,*/ 3/ 11
33,0/ 1/ *717
,2/ It 27
77,5/ 3/ 1,34
*,*/ 3/ ,0b
71,B/ 2/ 80
,*/ 2/ 0
*
NYNF
708,7 (27,1)
*b*,B (18,9)
5*,* (130,0)
7lb3
272,0
181,1 ( b315)
13,2/ 3/ 132
1,1/ 3/ 11
31,5/ 3/ 11*S
3,2/ 3/ 12
21,*/ 3/ .33
*,1/ 3/ ,07
13,1/ 2/ 13
1,0/ 2/ 1
23,01
17,7S
7,17
21,22
*bb
111
233
11*
lb2B
IbOS
**72
1027
.32
,52
,8b
1,1
21,1
71,5
12,i
*8,b?
23. *b
27,17
11,87
3*3,b?
381,82
1085.22
21b,b3
1070,8
1153,1
5107,*
B75.8
3,bl
12.2b
33,22
*,*1
,55b
( 1.23)
.828 (
1,83)
2,17b
C
*,80)
.315 (
,87)
.73
( ,18)
1,71 (
2,30)
5,b3
<
7,55)
,b8 (
bb,75
( *',78)
13,bl (
10,21)
*.*?
(
3,70)
17,35 (
12,^*)
*71,32
( 351.tb)
222,78 (
lbb,12)
112,75
(
1*3,73)
31b,bl (
23b,15)
l*b8.5*
(1015.01)
1131,57 (
8*1,78)
107,13
(
b?b.**)
1280,23 (
15*,b7)
*,15
( 3,b1)
7,15 (
5,33)
5,10
<
*,*0)
b,** (
*,80)
,7b3
( 1,255)
,*83 (
,715)
,38b
(
,b35)
,578 (
,150)
PART
jculate data
, TOTAL FOR * BASS
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE
FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0,000
( 0,00)
MULTIPLIER FOR
G/TEST
0,000
MULTIPLIER FOR
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
0,0000
(0,0000)
multiplier for
G/KG FUEL
(G/LB FUEL) 0,0000
(0,0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE
FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0,00 (
0,0)
-------
TABLE D-2B (CONT'D). TEST 15-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO, ma
ENGINE MODEL 73 DODGE "US
ENGINE b . 8 L(»13 CID) V-S
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 738,J? MM HG(?9.Ob IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. ?*.* DEG C(7b.O DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DTF P mm, H?0(IN. H20)
BLOwEP INLET P mm. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. mETRES(SCF)
HC sample meteb/range/ppm
HC BCKGRD METER/PANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD MEtpp/RANGE/PCT
D NOX sample meter/range/ppm
^ NOX BCKGRD MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
io
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION Prm
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
B3CO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
B3C02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
B.b8 ( 11.b*)
7.58 ( S.bS)
208,53 (155,50)
*93 ( 7*1)
b.99 ( 5.21)
.»2* C ,b97)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, U-50M-001
TEST NO, 15-8 RUN
DATE 9/13/79
TIME 09111 GASOLINE EM»2b?-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 59 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11,7 GM/KG( 81,9 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F. 1,033*
1
nynf
b9b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
7lb5
272.0
111.3 ( b*03)
10,7/ 3/ 107
1,*/ 3/ 1*
38 ,*/ 3/ 111*
2.2/ 3/ b3
19,3/ 3/ .30
2.0/ 3/ .03
11.1/ 2/ 1*
.5/ 2/ 1
2
3
*
LANF
LAF
NYNF
711.2 (28
.0)
7b2,0 (30
.0)
708,7 (27,9)
*72,4 (18
.b)
5*1,0 (21
.3)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130,0)
S*,* (130,0)
S*,» (130,0)
8085
8315
71b3
307,0
31b, 0
272,0
20*,2 (
7212)
208,* (
73b0)
181,1 ( b395!
15.3/ 3/
153
2*,5/ 3/
2*5
13,5/ 3/ 135
1.7/ 3/
17
1,8/ 3/
18
1,7/ 3/ 17
*0,3/ 3/
llbB
33,3/ 1/
*7b3
39,9/ 3/ 1157
1.7/ 3/
*9
.1/ 1/
13
,7/ 3/ 20
33,0/ 3/
.S3
7*,1/ 3/
1,32
19,9/ 3/ ,31
2,2/ 3/
.03
2.*/ 3/
,0*
2,*/ 3/ ,0*
39,b/ 2/
*0
85,9/ 2/
8b
1*,3/ 2/ 1*
,5/ 2/
1
,b/ 2/
1
,9/ 2/ 1
32.01
20,25
7,*3
30,77
93
137
229
119
102b
1088
*539
1109
.27
.50
1.29
,28
13, b
39,1
85,*
13. *
9.77
lb. 12
27,57
12,38
21b.bO
258.78
1101,*3
233,7*
899.5
1879,0
*933,2
912,*
*.88
15,79
35,17
*,81
.*01
(
.88)
,737
(
l,b2)
2.128
(
* , b9)
,*lb
(
,92)
.71
(
,95)
l,b7
(
2,2*)
S, b 2
(
7.5*)
,b8
(
.92)
13.83
(
10.31)
9 , bb
(
7,20)
*,90
(
3,bb)
18,10
(
13,50)
30b.53
(
228,SB)
155.07
(
115,b3)
195,88
(
l*b,07)
3*1,70
(
25*,80)
1272.97
(
9*9.?S)
1125.97
(
839,b3)
877,35
(
bS*,2*)
1333,79
(
99*.bl)
b,91
(
5.15)
9.*b
(
7,0b)
b,2b
(
*.bb)
7,03
(
S.2*)
• 5b7
(
.932)
,**1
(
.72b)
.379
(
,b22)
,b08
(
,999)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
0.000 ( 0,00)
0,000
0,0000 (0*0000)
0,0000 (0,0000)
to X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0,00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-3A. TEST 16-1 EfllSSIGNS RESULTS
ENGINE NU. lb
tNGTNF MWOEL 73 CHFV *5*
ENGJNF. ll.ll L( -11 CIO) V-8
CVS NO, 9
BAROMETER 7*7.01 MM HG(29.*1 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 OEG F)
COLD TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 01 RUN
DATE 12/13/71
TIME Ulino
OYNO NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY *8 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.1 GH/KG( 57,0
PROJECT NO, 11-50*1-001
GASOLINE £M-8b?-F
BAG CART NO, 1
GRAINS/LS) NOX HUMIDITY C,F, ,9218
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN, H2U)
BLOWER IHLET p mm. H20(IN. H20)
BLOKER IHLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
0
1
M
w
HC
HC
C(»
Cu
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
SAMPLE
8CKGRD
COS SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
ME TFR/RANGE/PPM
ME TtR/RANGE/PPM
ME IER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
MEJER/RANGE/PCT
ME IER/RANGE/PPM
ME IER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTIUN FACTUM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX COKCFNTRATION PPM
1
NYNF
hlb.O (27.*)
*S7.2 (18.0)
S*.* (13(1,0)
71h7
272.0
183.b ( b*8b)
13,1/ 3/
1,3/ 3/
2b,8/ 3/
.2/ 3/
27.9/ 3/
3,3/ 3/
1.7/ 2/
,8/ 2/
25,1b
122
Ml 3
.*1
B.I
13*
13
b23
S
,*b
.05
10
1
2
lanf
711,2 (28,0)
172.* (18.b)
S*.* (130,0)
8u8b
307,0
20b,8 ( 7305)
bl.O/ 8/
12,3/ 2/
7*,3/U/
3.3/11/
U.I/ 3/
3,7/ 3/
32,2/ 2/
,1/ 2/
17,85
49
30*
.bb
31, *
bl
12
323
10
.71
,0b
32
1
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21.3)
*8.1 (120,0)
8315
31b,0
21*.5 ( 757b)
lb.*/ 3/ »M
1.*/ 3/ 1*
bO.S/ 2/ 308*
,b/ 2/ 83
83,5/ 3/ 1,5*
*,3/ 3/ ,07
9b,2/ 2/ lb
1,8/ 2/ 2
7,23
152
2««2b
l.*1
1*.b
*
NYNF
708,7 (27,9)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130,0)
71b3
272,0
1B3,* ( b*7b)
SO,2/ 2/
15,2/ 2/
71,2/11/
ll.b/ll/
25,5/ 3/
*,2/ 3/
13.8/ 2/
1,8/ 2/
29,72
3b
2b2
.35
lt.l
50
IS
31)2
35
,*2
,0b
1*
2
HC MASS GRAMS
12,87
S.81
18,80
3,7b
CO MASS GrtAKS
121,0*
73,2b
730,7*
55,81
C02 MASS GRAMS
1378,*
2*18,*
583*.1
1188,b
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.89
11.*3
35,80
3,10
FUEL KG (L»)
.Sll
(
1.13)
,830 (
1.83)
2,220
(
*.81)
,*0b
(
,10)
KM HR (HP HR)
» b7
(
.SO)
l.b9 (
2.27)
5,8b
i
7,8b)
,bb
c
,81)
B3HC G/KW HR (.G/HP HR)
11.2*
(
1*.35)
3.*8 (
2,bO)
3.ex
I
2.31)
S,b8
(
*,23)
HSCO G/Krt HR (G/HP HR)
199.88
(
1*3,83)
. '3.31 (
32,30)
12*,b3
{
'2,1*)
8*.*8
(
b3,00)
BSCD2 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
20bU.3*
(153b.*0)
1*77.1* (1101,50)
115.IS
i
7*2,08)
171b,8b
(1339,12)
HS'JUX G/KK HH (G/HP HR)
*.32
(
3.22)
f».7h (
S,0*)
b.li
i
*,SS)
5,81
(
*,*0)
HSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HH)
.7b*
(
l.ZSb)
.*11 (
,807)
,379
i
,b22)
, bl*
(
1,001)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP MR)
BSMC G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
B8CU G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/K« HK (G/HP MM)
B5N0X G/KW Hk (G/HP Hh)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
8,89 ( 11,12)
*.b5 ( 3.*7)
1U.3U ( 83,HO)
1227 (
h.OB (
lib)
* * S3)
HSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) ,*H7 ( .73*)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIEK FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
?0 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO" SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/L6 FULL)
0,000 ( 0,00)
0.000
0.0000 (0,0000)
11,0000 (0,0000)
n.no (
0,0)
-------
TABLE D-3A (CONT'D). TEST 16-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO. lb
ENGINE MOREL 73 CHEV 15*
Engine o.n L( -n CID) v-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 717.111 MM HG(29.H IM HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 OEG C(73.0 DEG F)
HOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 01 RUN
DATE 12/13/79
TIME 01133
DYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 17 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.8 GM/KG( 57.7
PROJECT NO, 11-50*1-001
GASOLINE EM-Bb7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F. ,92*8
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER 1>IF P MM. H20(IN, HBO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CCOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NO* SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
0
1
1
NYNF
b9b,0 (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
S*.* (130.0)
71b5
273.0
183,b ( b«m)
81,3/ 2/ 81
13.1/ 2/ 11
8b,7/12/ 210
2.8/12/ 5
23,3/ 3/ ,38
3.0/ 3/ ,05
13.1/ 2/ 13
1*3/ 2/ 1
32,9*
b8
201
,33
12.1
2
LANF
711,2 (28,0)
*72,* (18,b)
5*.* (130,0)
bobs
307.0
20b,8 ( 730*)
57,b/ 2/ S8
13,8/ 2/ 1*
bS.b/ll/ 2b8
2,*/ll/ 7
31,*/ 3/ ,b7
3,2/ 3/ ,0S
33,7/ 2/ 3*
1,1/ 2/ I
11.XI
*5
25*
«b?
32.*
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21,3)
*8,1 (120,0)
831S
31b(0
7,50
152
3022
l.*2
12.7
*
NYNF
708,7 (27.S)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,1 (130,0)
71b2
272,0
21*, 5
(
757b)
183,3 (
b*7S)
lb,3/
3/
lb3
52.*/ 2/
S2
1,3/
3/
13
12,0/ 2/
12
bl.9/
2/
3183
7*,*/ll/
323
2/
27
1*,7/11/
*5
71,8/
3/
l.*7
25,1/ 3/
.*1
3,b/
3/
,0b
*,0/ 3/
.Ob
91,7/
2/
IS
1*,!/ 2/
1*
2.3/
2/
2
2,3/ 2/
2
30,03
*1
273
.35
12.1
HC MASS GRAMS
7,18
5.31
18,77
*,31
CO MASS GRAMS
*2,90
bl.lb
75*,87
58,22
coe mass grams
1121,b
23*8,b
55b8,7
X175.X
NOX MASS GRAMS
3,9*
11,8*
35,18
3,92
FUEL KG (LB)
.382 (
.8*)
.77b (
1,71)
2,1*8
(
*.7*)
.*0*
(
.89)
KW MR (HP HR)
«b8 (
.92)
1,70 (
2.28)
5,88
t
7,88)
,b8
(
.12)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
10.50 (
7.83)
3.13 (
2.33)
3.11
(
2.38)
b, 31
(
*,70)
BSCO G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
b2.71 (
lb.7b)
3b.00 (
2b.85)
128,11
I
15.7b)
85,11
(
b3,*7)
HSC02 G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
Ib39,b5 (1222, b9)
1382,13 (1030,88)
917,32
(
70b,*2)
1717,80
(1280,9b)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
5,7b (
*.30)
•>,97 (
5.20)
5,98
i
*.*b)
5,73
(
*,27)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.558 (
.918)
.*57 (
.751)
, 3b5
t
.bOl)
,590
(
.170)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KN HR (G/HP HR)
HSCO G/KM HK (G/HP HR)
HSC02 G/K" HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW UK (G/HP HH)
HSFC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR)
8.95 (
3.18 (
12.00)
2.^7)
102.53 ( ?b.1b)
11*2 ( 951)
b«l3 ( *,57)
,*15 ( ,b82)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
0,000 ( 0,00)
0,000
0,0000 (0,0000)
Q.0000 (0,0000)
0.00'( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-3B. TEST 16-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO. lb
ENGINE MOOflt '3 CHEV »$"»
ENGINE ii.II L( -0 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 7Sll.Be *M HGC29.5b IN HG)
DRY HULK TEMP. 21.7 OEG C(71.U t)EG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLPHER INLET TEmP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOK STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? dckgho
NOX SAMPLE
NOX HCKGRO
ME TER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
meier/range/pct
METER/RANGE/PCT
MfcTER/KANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
U1
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR>
65HC G/KH HH (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HH (G/HP HH)
B5C02 G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP MR)
BSfC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR)
TEST NO. 02
DATE I2/l*/79
TIME
orNO NO, 2
COLD TRANSIENT
RUN
PROJECT NO, ll-50**-001
GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY *b PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.5 GH/KG( 52.* GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .90*1
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.1)
*S7.2 (18.0)
5*.* (lan.o)
7lbb
272,0
is*.b ( bseo)
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72,* (18.b)
5*.* (130,0)
808b
307.0
207.9 ( 73**)
12.2/ 3/
1.1/ 3/
28.*/ 3/
.2/ 3/
27.2/ 3/
2.9/ 3/
9.0/ 2/
.3/ 2/
122
11
bb2
S
,"»S
,0*
q
0
51,2/ 2/
11.2/ 2/
bb,7/ll/
3.5/11/
*1.9/ 3/
3,*/ 3/
3*,0/ 2/
.b/ 2/
59
11
275
10
• n
.05
3*
1
3
UF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1.0 (21,3)
5*,* (130.0)
831b
31b,0
212.2 ( 7*9b)
15,9/ 3/ 159
1.*/ 3/ 1*
S9.3/ 2/ 3001
,b/ 2/ 23
83,0/ 3/ 1,53
*.5/ 3/ .07
33.3/ 3/ 100
.5/ 3/ e
*
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*b*«8 (18,3)
5*.* (130,0)
71b3
272,0
18*,3 ( bSU)
**,7/ 2/
13,1/ 2/
bl.2/H/
12,0/11/
2b,0/ 3/
*.8/ 3/
13,b/ 2/
1,9/ 2/
*S
13
2*3
3b
.*3
.Ob
1*
2
dilution factor
25, b3
17.97
7.30
29,5b
HC CONCENTRAlion PPM
111
*9
1*7
32
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
b*?
257
28*9
203
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
,*0
.bb
I.*7
.3b
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
8.7
33.*
98.fa
11,8
HC MASS GRAMS
11 ,8b
5.83
17,98
3,*1
CO MASS GRAMS
138.n?
b2.27
70*,01
*3,«»B
CO? MASS GRAMS
13b3.9
2528.S
5722,2
122*.b
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.78
12,02
3b,19
3,75
FUEL KG (LB)
.510
(
1.12)
.83*
(
1.8*)
2.171
(
*.79)
.*11 (
.91)
KW HR (HP HR)
.bb
(
.89)
1.71
C
2.29)
5,8*
I
7.83)
.bb (
.89)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
17.93
C
13.37)
3.*2
C
2.55)
3,08
(
2.30)
5.15 (
3.8*)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
208.bS
(
1S5.59)
3b.*9
(
27.21)
120,53
(
89.88)
b5,73 (
*9,02)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
20f»! ,81
(1537.*9)
1*81.7b
din*.95)
979,b9
(
730.5b)
1851,1b (1380,*1)
BSNOX G/K« HH (G/Hp HR)
*,20
(
3.1*)
7.05
C
5.25)
b,20
<
* • b2)
S,b7 (
*.23)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
.771
(
1.2b8)
.*89
(
.803)
.372
i
.bll)
,b21 (
1.031)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
8.87 ( 11.90)
*,*1 ( 3,29)
10b.85 (
1222 (
b.17 (
.**3 (
79.bB)
911)
*.MI)
.728)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO"" SCH(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
0.000 C 0.00)
0.000
11.0000 (0,0000)
0,00(10 (0,0000)
u.no ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-:
fcNGINF NO. lb
engine model 73 chev *5*
ENGINE II.(I L( -0 CII>) V-B
CVS NO. 9
ttAROMElER 750.B2 MM HG(29.5b IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP, ?!.? DEG C(7I.O OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20CIN, H?0)
BLOWER I"LET P Mh. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLHW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
mc sample meter/range/ppm
MC HCKCUD HEIER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD MEIER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD MFHER/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD MF TER/RANGE/PPM
o>
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CDNCEKTRAIION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPm
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO mass GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KM HK CHP MR)
BSHC G/KW HR CG/HP HH)
8SC0 G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KK HH (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HH (G/HP hR)
HSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR).
TOTAL TEST RCSULTS H BAGS
TOTAL KK HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/Hp HH)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KH HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
8.87 ( 11.90)
3.b3 ( ?.71)
95.51 ( 71.??)
1155 ( 8hl)
b, 15 ( *,59)
.*15 ( ,b82)
(CONT'D). TEST 16-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. ll-S0**-0Ol
TEST NO. 02 RUN
DATE 12/l*/79
TIME GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
DYNO NO, ? BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY *9 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUHIDITV 7.9 GM/KGC 55.b GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F, ,91b3
1
NYNF
bSb.O (27,*)
*57.2 (lB.O)
S*.* (130.0)
71 b5
272,0
181.b ( b5l9)
b8.9/ 2/ bq
11.3/ 2/ 11
71.9/12/ 17*
1.8/12/ 3
23.9/ 3/ .39
3.3/ 3/ .05
13.1/ 2/ 13
1.5/ 2/ 2
32.SU
SB
Ibb
.3*
lt.b
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72,* (18.b)
51.* (130,0)
808b
307.0
207.9 ( 73**)
52,5/ 2/ 53
11,*/ 2/ 11
89,8/12/ 221
2.3/12/ *
39.8/ 3/ ,b7
3,5/ 3/ ,05
32.B/ 3/ 33
1,0/ 2/ 1
19,12
*2
210
« b2
31.9
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130,0)
831b
31(it0
212.2 ( 7*9b)
15,3/ 3/ 153
1,0/ 3/ 10
59,9/ 2/ 30*3
.*/ 2/ IS
80,7/ 3/ 1,*8
*,0/ 3/ ,0b
97.0/ 2/ 97
2,*/ 2/ 2
7,*8
1**
2895
1,*3
99,9
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*,B (18,3)
5*,* (130.0)
Jlb3
272,0
18*.3 ( bSll)
*3,5/ 2/ *3
12.0/ 2/ 12
98,3/12/ 250
18,*/12/ 3b
2*.9/ 3/ .*1
*,1/ 3/ .Ob
13.9/ 2/ 1*
1.9/ 2/ 8
30,83
32
210
,3*
12*1
b , 1 7
5.00
17.b7
3,39
35,75
50. q?
715,*3
*5.11
11*7,b
2373.1
SSbl,8
llb*.b
3,77
11. bl
35,31
3,90
,38b
{
.85)
.778 (
1,72)
2,125
I
* ,b9)
.393
( .87)
«bb
(
,89)
1.71 (
2,29)
5,8*
i
7,83)
« bb
( ,89)
9,33
(
b.95)
2.93 (
2,19)
3.02
c
2,2b)
5,13
( 3,82)
5*.n*
c
*0,30)
29.8* (
22,25)
122,*9
i
91,3*)
b8,19
( 50,8S)
173*,BO
(1293.b*)
139U,b9 (1037,0*)
952.23
<
710,08)
17b0,*7
(1312,78)
5,70
(
*•25)
b, 80 (
5,07)
b.OS
i
1.51)
5,89
( *.39)
,583
(
,9S8)
• *5b (
.780)
,3b*
i
# S98)
#59*
( «9?b)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
9IJMM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW SCMC8CF) 0.000 ( 0,00)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/TEST 0,000
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 0,0000 (0,0000?
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) 0,0000 (0,0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCMISCF) 0.00 C 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-4A. TEST 17-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINF NO. 427
ENGINE MODEL 73 CMC 427
ENGINE 7.0 LI*27 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 744.47 MM HG(29.31 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 20.6 OEG CC69.0 DEG F)
COLO TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 17-2 RUN 1
DATE 10/2*/79
TIME 09:01
OYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY1 49 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.5 GM/KG( 52.8
PROJECT MO. 11-5044-001
GASOLINE EN-267-F
BAG CART NO. 1
GRAINS/LB) N0< HUMIDITY C.F. .9057
BAG RESJLTS
D
I
H*
-J
BAG
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(1N• H20I
696.0 (27
.4)
711.2
(28
.0)
762.0 (30
.0)
708.7 (27.
9)
BLOWER INLET P MM.
H20(IN. H20)
457.2 (18
.0)
472.4
(18
.6)
541.0 (21
.3)
464.3 (18.
3)
BLOWER INLET TEMP.
DEG. C(DEG. F)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4
(130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
5
BSCO G/
0SFC KG/KW HR (lB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
47.15 I 35.16)
263.91 ( 196.80)
1460.03 (1038.74)
b. 39 ( 4.76)
.638 ( 1.049)
10.90 (
79.34 <
8.13)
59.1b)
1218.11 ( 908.34)
8.71 ( 6.50)
.434 ( .714)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
4.85 ( 3.61) 12.24 ( 9.13)
64.10 ( 47.80) 85.56 { 63.80)
1360.89 (1014.81)
7.55 t 5.63)
.330 ( .543) .484 ( .795)
931.58 ( 694.68)
11.24 ( 8.38)
TOTAL XW HR (HP HR) 9.13 ( 12.25)
BSHC C/KW HR (G/HP HR) 10.09 ( 7.52)
BSCO C/KW HR (G/HP HR) 85.12 ( 63.48)
BSC02 S/KW HR (C/HP HR) 1066 I 795)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/MP HR) 10.05 .( 7.4?)
85FC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR> .388 ( .638)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 K 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF1
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KC FJEL (G/LB FUEL)
S CM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 (
0.0)
-------
TABLE D-4A (CONT'D). TEST 17-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
ENGINE NO. 427
ENGINE M30EL 73 GMC 427
ENGINE 7.0 L I A 2 7 CIDJ V-8
CVS NO. 9
TEST NO. 17-2
DATE 10/2*1/71
TINE 09:42
DYNO NO. 2
RUN 1
GASOLINE EM-267-F
BAG CART NO. I
BAROMETER 744.73 MM HG<29.32 IN HGI
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEC CC72.0 OEG F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.4 GM/KGt 59.1 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .9303
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
0
1
H
00
1
NYNF
696.0 127.4)^
457.2 (16.01
54.4 1130.0)
7165
272.0
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
472.4 (18.6)
54.4 (130.0)
8087
307.0
TOTAL FLOW
STD. CU. METRESISCF)
183.0 (
6463)
HC
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
14.8/ 3/
143
HC
BCKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPM
1.3/ 3/
13
CO
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
82.4/11/
380
CO
BCKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPM
1.7/11/
5
C02
SAMPLE
ME TE R/RANGE/PCT
21.4/ 3/
.35
C02
BCKGRO
METE*/RANGE/PCT
2.8/ 3/
.04
NOX
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
18.1/ 2/
18
NOX
BCKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPN
.8/ 2/
1
20b.2 (
7282)
14.0/ 3/
140
1.3/ 3/
13
86.6/11/
413
1.6/11/
5
35.9/ 3/
.60
2.7/ 3/
.04
47.7/ 2/
48
.8/ 2/
1
3
LAF
762.0 (30.0)
541.0 (21.3)
54.4 (130.01
8316
316.0
210.4 ( 74311
21.9/ 3/
1.4/ 3/
219
14
57.6/ 3/ 1440
.2/ 3/ 5
78.6/ 3/ 1.44
3.3/ 3/ .05
60.1/ 3/ 180
.4/ 3/ 1
4
NYNF
709.7 (27.91
464.8 (18.3)
54.4 (130.0)
7162
272.0
182.7 (
6454)
13.5/ 3/
135
1.4/ 3/
14
90.2/11/
443
1.5/11/
4
21.7/ 3/
.35
3.3/ 3/
.05
18.4/ 2/
18
1.0/ 2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
33.72
20.42
8.37
32.89
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
135
128
207
121
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
367
397
1373
429
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.30
.56
1.40
.30
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
17.3
46.9
179.2
17.4
HC MASS GRAMS
14.29
15.18
25.08
12.80
CO MASS GRAMS
78.18
95.41
336.35
91.31
C02 MASS GRAMS
1018.5
2125.4
5379.6
1009.4
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.64
17.22
67. 11
5.67
FUEL KG (LB)
.374
(
.32)
.732
(
1.61)
1.888
(
4.16)
.376
(
.83)
KM HR (HP HR)
.77
(
1.03)
1.82
(
2.44)
5.83
(
7.81)
.77
(
1.04)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18.64
(
13.90)
8.34
(
6.22)
4.30
(
3.21)
16.53
(
12.33)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
101.96
(
75.03)
52.45
(
39.11)
57.73
(
43.05)
117.93
(
87.94)
BSC02 G/*U HR (G/HP HR)
1328.39
(
993.58)
1168.34
(
B71.23)
923.42
(
688.59)
1303.69
(
972.16)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
7.36
(
5.49)
9.47
(
7.06)
11.52
(
8.59 )
7.32
(
5.46)
BSFC KG/ Kit HR (lB/HP HR)
.488
(
. 802 j
.403
(
.662)
.324
(
.533)
.486
(
.799)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 SAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR) 9.19 ( 12.32)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 7.33 ( 5,47)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/H? HR) 65.45 ( 48.81)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 1038 ( 774)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/H? HR) 10.41 ( 7.76)
0SFC KG/KM HR (LB/HP HRI .367 ( .603)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
multiplier for
multiplier for
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP
HRI
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL) 0.0000 (O.OOOO)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0.00 (
0.0)
-------
ENGINE NO. Ha;
ENGINE MODEL 73 GMC *27
ENGINE 7.0 LC127 CID) V-8
CVS NO. S
barometer 7**.22 mm HG(?s.3f» in hG)
DRY HtlLH TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(7*.H DEG F)
BAG RFSULTS
BAR NUMBER
OCSCHIPTION
BLOWER OIF P Mtf. HeO(IN. H?0)
BI.OWF.R INLET P MM. H20( IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONOS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE ME rER/RANGE/PPM
HC HCKGRO MEIER/HANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METF.R/UANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METFR/KANGE/PPM
co? sample metfr/range/pct
CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NO* SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
,1 NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
10
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
nox concentraiion ppm
HC mass grams
co mass grams
co? mass grams
nox mass grams
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
ar.HC fi/KW HR CG/HP HR)
RSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
HSMOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HK (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
B3C0 G/K4 HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 S/K* HK (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HK ce/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LH/HP HR)
9.30 ( 12.*7)
10.03 ( 7.*8)
B5.0S ( b3.*2)
ltl52 (
10.b3 (
.38* (
785 )
7.93)
• b31 )
D-^B. TEST 17-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. U-5Q**-001
TEST NO. 17-3 RUN
DATE 10/25/79
TIME 08:31 GASOLINE EM-2t,7-F
OYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUHIDITY 50 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.1 GM/KG( b3.5 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .9*89
1
NYNF
bSb . 0 (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71b7
271.9
182.9 ( b*bO)
2
Unf
711.2 (28.0)
H72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8089
307.0
20b.1 ( 7279)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8321
31b.0
210.* ( 7*3o)
*
NYNF
708,7 (27,s)
*b*.8 (18.3)
S*.* (130.0)
71b5
272.0
182.7 ( b*S3)
33.3/ 3/ 333
1.2/ 3/ ia
38.3/ 3/ 110
.1/ 3/ 2
23.2/ 3/ .38
3.*/ 3/ .05
15,7/ 2/ lb
.b/ 2/ 1
17.S/ 3/ 179
1.3/ 3/ 13
25.5/ 3/ SSI
.2/ 3/ S
37.2/ 3/ .b3
3.5/ 3/ .05
*8.1/ 2/ *8
.7/ 2/ 1
23.2/ 3/ 232
1.*/ 3/ 1*
b3.0/ 3/ lbOl
.2/ 3/ 5
80.b/ 3/ i.*e
3.9/ 3/ .Ob
bl.S/ 3/ 18*
.1/ 3/ 0
13.b/ 3/ 13b
1.*/ 3/ 1*
SO.5/11/ **b
2.b/H/ 8
22.0/ 3/ .3b
3.b/ 3/ .Ob
18.1/ 2/ 18
.S/ 2/ 1
2b.87
IS.11
8.08
32.*5
321
lb?
220
122
887
571
152b
*28
.33
.58
l.*3
.30
15.1
IB*.2
17.2
33.SI
IS.81
2b. feb
12.SO
188.93
13b.91
373.8*
Si.IS
10S2.8
2170.b
5508.0
1011.3
5.02
17.7*
70.35
5.71
.*72
( 1.0*)
.772
C
1,70)
1,9*8
(
*.30)
.377
C
.83)
.75
( 1.01)
1.83
c
2.*5)
S.93
<
7.95)
• 7S
(
1.0b)
*5.11
( 33.b*)
10.85
(
8.09)
*.50
I
3.35)
lb.3*
(
12.IS)
251.3*
( 1B7.*2)
7*.95
(
55.89)
b3.03
(
*7.00)
115.*8
(
8b.11)
1*53.81
(lt1B*.ll)
1188.30
(
88b.12)
S28.b8
i
bS2.52)
1281.28
C
S55.*5)
b.b8
( *.S8)
S. 71
c
7.2*)
11.8b
(
8.85)
7.2*
(
S.*0)
,b?8
( 1.032)
.*23
(
.bSS)
.328
i
.5*0)
.*77
(
.785)
PARTICULATE DATA
, TOTAL
FOR * BAGS
SOMM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP KR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (O.OOOQ)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-4B (CONT'D). TEST.17-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-50«H-001
engine no. h2?
ENGINE MODEL 73 CMC f?7
ENGINE 7.0 L(*27 CIO) V-8
CVS Nn. 1
BAROMF TEI5 7**.?2 MM HG(29.3I) IN HG)
DRY BULH TEMP. 2*.* OEG C(7b.ri OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUM3EU
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIK P
BLOrtER INLET
BLOWER INLET 1EMP. OEG.
BLOWER DEVOLUTIONS
TIME I3EC0N0S
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
MM. H20(IN. H20)
P MM. H20(IN. H20)
C(DEG. F)
TEST NO. 17-3
OATE 10/25/79
TIME 09:11
DYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50 RCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9.8 GH/KG( b8.3 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .9b93
1
NYNF
fe9b.O (27.*)
<~57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71 bb
272.0
182.9 ( b*59)
2
Lanf
711.2 C2B.0)
*72.* C18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8087
307.0
20b.0 ( 7277)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8318
31b. 0
210.3 ( 7*28)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71fa3
272.0
182,b ( b*Sl)
HC SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
17.5/ 3/
175
lb.j/ 3/
Ibb
22.7/ 3/
227
13.7/ 3/
137
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
1.*/ 3/
1*
I.*/ 3/
1*
1.5/ 3/
15
1.5/ 3/
15
co sample mftfr/range/ppm
83.7/11/
390
90.*/U/
»*5
57.8/ 3/
l**b
8^.*/ll/
39b
CO BCKGRO MP 1 ER/f!ANGF./PPM
l.t/Jl/
1.7/11/
5
.1/ 3/
2
2.0/11/
b
CO? SAMPLE MEIER/RANGF/PCT
21.5/ 3/
.35
3b.3/ 3/
.bl
?q.s/ 3/
1 • *b
21.0/ 3/
.3*
CO? HCKGRf) MF.TER/RANGE/PCT
3.0/ 3/
.05
3.1/ 3/
.05
3.b/ 3/
.Ob
3.*/ 3/
.05
NOX SAMPLE METfcR/RANGF./PPM
17.q/ 2/
18
*8.1/ 2/
H 8
b5.b/ 3/
197
17.S/ 2/
IB
NOX BCKGRO METER/KANGE/PPM
.7/ 2/
1
.7/ 2/
1
.3/ 3/
1
.8/ 2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
33.27
20.02
8.27
3*.27
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
lbl
153
21*
122
CO CUNCENTHAlION PPM
377
*28
1380
381
CO? CONCENTRAlION PCT
.30
.5b
l.*l
.as
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
17.2
*7.*
19b.0
lb.7
HC MASS GRAMS
17.03
18.15
25.93
12.90
CO MASS GRAMS
80.37
102.b9
337.87
81.05
C02.MASS GRAMS
1013.7
2129.5
5*33.3
9b3, b
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.8H
18.12
7b.*3
5 .bb
FUEL KG (LB)
.37b
(
.83)
. 7H0 (
l.b3)
1.90b
I
*.20)
.357
(
.79)
KW HR (HP HR)
.75
(
1.01)
1.83 (
2. *5)
5.89
c
7,90)
.78
(
1.05)
BSHC G/KW HR IG/HP HR)
22. bS
(
lb.89)
i.ia (
7.*1)
*.*0
(
3.28)
lb.50
(
12.30)
BSCO G/KW HH CG/HP HR)
10b.SI
(
79.73)
5b.22 (
*1.92)
57.33
c
H2.7S)
103.b7
(
77.31)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
13f8.5*
(1005.bO)
llbS.78 (
Bb9.32)
921.93
i
b87.*8)
1232.52
(
919.09)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
7.77
(
5.79)
¦*.92 (
?.*0)
12.97
(
9,b7)
7.2*
(
S.*0)
HSFC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR)
.501
(
.823)
.*05 (
.bbb)
.323
i
.532)
. tSb
c
.750)
TOTAL . TEST RESULTS BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR)
8SHC G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
ftSCU G/KW HK (G/HP HW)
BSCU2 5/KW HK (G/HP HH)
9.25 ( 12.*1)
8.00 ( S.9b)
b5.05 ( *8.51)
1031 ( 7b9)
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HR ) 11.*b ( 8.55)
BSFC KG/K* HK (LB/HP HH) .3bS ( .bOO)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOM
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 2G FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TE3T
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0,0000)
o.oo (
0.0)
-------
TABVJE D-5A. TEST 18-2 EttlSSlONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, 11-5011-001
ENGINF NO.C 350
ENGINF MODEL ?2 CHEV 350
ENGINF 5.7 L(350 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 751.33 MM HG(29.58 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEG C(71.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
0E8CRIPTI0N
BLOWER OIF P
BLOWER INLET
MM. H20CIN. H20)
P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
to
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
CO? SAMPLE
COS BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR CG/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TEST NO.18-1 RUN
DATE 11/11/79
time nqsas
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE EM-ab7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.3 GM/KGC SB.2 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .92b7
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.1)
1S7.2 (18.0)
5*.i (I3n.0)
71bS
273.0
181.7 ( bS21)
2
LAN F
711.2 (28.0)
172.1 (18.b)
51.1 (130.0)
808b
307.0
208.1 ( 7319)
21.7/ 3/
1.3/ 3/
817
13
15.5/ 3/ 1100
.1/ 3/
lb.7/ 3/
2.2/ 3/
7.7/ 2/
.1/ 2/
2
.27
.03
8
0
12.9/ 3/
1.3/ 3/
32.0/ 3/
.8/ 3/
2b.8/ 3/
2.1/3/
29.7/ 2/
.1/ 2/
129
13
751
5
.11
.03
30
0
3
LAF
7b2 •0 (30.0)
511.0 (21.3)
51.1 (130.0)
8317
31b. 0
212.1 ( 7502)
12.0/ 3/ 120
1.3/ 3/ 13
15.9/ 3/ 1111
.2/ 3/ S
b7,3/ 3/ 1.21
2.1/ 3/ .01
13.1/ 3/ 130
.1/ 3/ 0
1
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
lfel.8 (18.3)
51.1 (130.0)
71V3
272.0
181.S ( bSlb)
18.0/ 3/
1.*/ 3/
95.9/11/
1.5/11/
lb.8/ 3/
2.3/ 3/
11.5/ 2/
.7/ 2/
180
11
195
1
.27
.01
11
1
DILUTION FACTOR
33.b3
25.52
10.09
10.10
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
231
H7
108
lbb
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
1071
728
10b3
180
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
.23
.11
1.18
.23
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
7, b
29.b
129.9
13.8
HC MASS GRAMS
21.97
13.98
13.27
17.70
CO MASS GRAMS
231.02
17b.3b
2b2.81
103.17
CO? MASS grams
789.8
1555.8
1575.9
788.9
NOX MASS GRAMS
3.19
10.92
18.92
1.52
FUFL KG (LB)
.388
(
.8b)
.592 (
1.30)
1.58b
(
3.50)
.318
(
.70)
KW HR (HP HR)
.71
(
.95)
1.50 (
2.01)
S.13
(
b.BB)
• b7
(
.90)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
35.31
(
2b.35)
¦>.35 (
b . 97)
2.59
(
1.93)
2b.lb
(
19.73)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
32b.9S
(
213.80)
117.89 (
87.91)
51.27
(
38.23)
151.21
(
111.99)
BSC02 G/KW HP (G/HP HR)
1117.73
(
833.19)
1010.03 (
775.55)
892.5b
(
bbS.58)
1179.17
(
879.31)
BSMOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
3.52
(
?.b3)
7.30 (
5.11)
9.51
(
7.12)
b. 75
(
5.01)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.550
(
.901)
.39b (
. b50)
.309
(
.509)
.175
(
.780)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
B.no ( 10.73)
8.71 ( b.52)
9b.70 ( 72.11)
9b1 ( 7H)
8.3b ( b. 23)
• 3t>l ( .593)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
0,000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (O.OOOG)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-5A (CONT'D). TEST 18-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.C 350
ENGINE MODEL 73 CHEVY
ENGINE 5.7 LC350 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 7*1.81 MM HGC29.52 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.7 DEG CC71.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
^ NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
to
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS H BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR) 8.10 ( 10.87)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) *.80 ( 3.58)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 109.38 ( 81.5b)
B8C02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 883 ( b59)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR) B.2b ( h.lb)
BSFC Kli/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .337 ( .555)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. ll-50**-001
TEST N0.1B-8 RUN
DATE U/lb/79
TIME 10527 GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
DYNO NO. 2 BAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.2 GM/KG{ 57.1 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .922b
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71b5
27?.n
18*.3 ( bSlO)
75.4/ 2/ .75
15.0/ 2/ 15
SO.0/11 / 'MO
.7/11/ 5
lb.b/ 3/ .2b
2.5/ 3/ .0*
15.1/ 2/ 15
1.0/ 2/ 1
2
LaNF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
St.* (130.0)
808b
307.0
207.b ( 733*)
91.3/ 2/ 91
1*.9/ 2/ 15
25.3/ 3/ 735
.1/ 3/ 3
27.5/ 3/ .**
3.3/ 3/ .05
3b.2/ 2/ 3b
1.2/ 2/ 1
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8318
31b.0
212.0 ( 7*87)
15.9/ 3/ 159
1.5/ 3/ 15
7b.b/ 3/ 217b
.3/ 3/ 9
b*.b/ 3/ 1.13
2.9/ 3/ .0*
*0.5/ 3/ 121
.3/ 3/ 1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71b3
272.0
18*.1 ( >502)
b3.7/ 2/ b*
13.0/ 2/ 13
98.1/11/ 51b
2.7/11/ 8
lb.3/ 3/ .25
3.1/ 3/ .05
l*.l/ 2/ 1*
.8/ 2/ 1
*3.82
25.8b
9.89
*3 .bl
bl
77
l*b
51
*29
n*
208b
*98
• 22
.39
1.09
.21
l*.l
35.0
120.7
13.3
b.*b
9.22
17.79
5 . *1
91.97
172.75
51*.8b
10b.77
7*0.b
1* 8s.*
*23b.2
b9* . 1
*.59
12.8*
*5.15
*.33
.285
(
.b3)
«5b3 (
1.2*)
l.bOS
(
3.55)
.277
(
.bl)
. b8
(
.91)
1.53 (
2.05)
5.23
(
7.02)
. b?
(
.90)
9.5*
(
7.12)
b.O* (
*.50)
3 . *0
(
2.5*)
8.09
(
b.n*)
135.9*
<
101.37)
113.21 (
8*.*2)
98.*1
(
73.38)
159.bO
(
119.01)
109*.b*
(
81b.27)
973.*3 (
725.89)
809.bB
I
b03.78)
1037.*2
(
773.bO)
b.79
t
5.0b)
8 . *2 (
b . 28)
B.b3
(
b.**)
b . * 7
(
*.82)
. *22
(
• b9* )
»3b9 (
• b07)
.307
(
.505)
.*1*.
(
. b81)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
SCN(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
0.000 I 0.00)
0.000
o.oobo (o.oooo)
0.0000 (0.0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-5B. TEST 18-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-50**-001
ENGINE NU.C 350
ENG1NF MODEL 72 CHEV 350
ENGINE 5.? L(350 CID) V-B
CVS NO. . 1
BAROMETEH 7*1.b8 MM HG(?9.20 IN HG)
DRY RULB TCMP. 23.3 DEG C(7"f.0 DEG F)
BAG HESUL1S
BAG NUHftER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P
BLOWER INLET
BLOWER I»LET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU. hETRES(SCF)
MM. H20(IN. H20)
P MM. H20(IN. HBO)
TEMP. DEG. CCOEG. F)
D
I
to
UJ
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
TEST NO.18-3 RUN
DATE 11/20/79
TIME 081*9
DYNO NO. 8
GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b8 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.5 GM/KGC B7.S GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0b2b
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (130.0)
71b7
272.0
182.3 ( b*37)
2
lanf
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8088
30?.0
205.3 ( 7252)
21.9/ 3/
1.8/ 3/
219
18
H B.5/ 3/ 1182
.1/ 3/
15.7/ 3/
Z.b/ 3/
7.b/ 2/
.*/ 2/
2
.25
.0*
8
0
13.7/ 3/
1.9/ 3/
30.3/ 3/
.1/ 3/
2b.8/ 3/
2.9/ 3/
30.5/ 2/
.*/ 2/
137
19
709
2
.**
.0*
30
0
3
LAF
7B2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8319
31b. 0
209.b ( 7*01)
lb.O/ 3/ 1bO
2.0/ 3/ 20
75.2/ 3/ I'm
.1/ 3/
b3.*/ 3/
3.3/ 3/
37.3/ 3/
.1/ 3/
2
1-13
.05
112
0
»
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71b*
272.0
182.0 ( b*28)
b8.3/ 2/
18.7/ 2/
23.5/ 3/
.1/ 3/
Ib.b/ 3/
3.3/ 3/
13.3/ 2/
.5/ 2/
b8
19
5*3
2
.2b
.05
13
1
DILUTION FACTOR
3*.b9
25.70
10.02
*1.35
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
202
119
1*2
50
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
1118
b8S
1105
52b
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
.21
.*0
1.09
.22
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
7.2
30.1
111 .b
12.8
HC MASS GRAMS
21.1ft
l*.Ob
17.1b
5.25
CO MASS GRAMS
2*3.bl
lb3.7b
*b*.82
111.5b
CO? MASS GRAMS
7113.7
1*90.5
*lb5.1
71b.9
NDX MASS GRAMS
2.b7
12.57
*7.55
*.7*
FUEL KG (LB)
.3b*
(
.80)
• SbS
(
1.25)
l.SbO
I
3.**)
.287 ( .b3)
KW HR (HP HR)
.b*
(
.8b)
l.*b
C
l.«»b)
5.10
I
b.83)
.b5 ( .88)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
33.15
(
2*.72)
9. b*
(
7.19)
3.37
I
2.51)
8.03 ( 5.99)
BSCO 6/KW HR (G/HP HR)
381.2b
(
28*.31)
112.29
(
83.7*)
91.20
t
b8.01)
170.59 ( 127.21)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1101.37
(
821.29)
1022.09
(
7b2.17)
817.23
C
b09.*1)
109b.25 (
: 817.*7)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
*.18
(
3.12)
8 . b2
(
b.*3)
9.33
I
b. 9b)
7.25 ( 5.*0)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
. 5b9
(
.93b)
.387
(
. b37 )
.30b
(
.503)
.*38 (
; .720)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW Hft (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HK (LB/HP HR)
7.85 ( 10.52)
7.35 ( 5.*8)
125.35 ( 93.*8)
902
8 . bO (
.35* (
b72)
b . *2 )
.581)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO" SCM(SCF)
SCM(SCF)
G/TE3T
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FULL)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.0000 (0.0000)
o.oo ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-5B (CONT'D). TEST 18-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
tNGINE NO.C 3 SO
ENGINE MUDEL 72 CHEV BSD
engine 5.? loso cid) v-a
cvs no. 9
TEST NO.18-3 RUN
DATE 11/20/71
TIME 09S29
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE EM-2b?-F
BAG CART NO. 1
BAROMETER 741.b8 MM hG(29.20 IN HG)
DRY BULB TE"P. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
INSCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
1 BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER RFVOLUIIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOw STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY b5 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.9 GN/KGC 83.b GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0*21
1
NYNF
b9b.O (27.4)
457.2 (18.0)
54.4 (13D.0)
71b5
272.0
182.2 ( b435)
2
lanf
711.2 (28.0)
472.4 (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
808b
307.0
205.3 ( 7250)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5H1.0 (21.3)
S4.4 (130.0)
8317
31b.0
209.5 ( 7*00)
4
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
4b4.8 (18.3)
54.4 (130.0)
71b3
272.0
182.0 ( b428)
a
I
to
4^
HC
SAMPLE
ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
71.2/ 2/
71
82.7/
2/
83
15.7/
3/
157
7.2/
3/
72
HC
BCKGRD
ME 1ER/RANGE/PPM
20.0/ 2/
2D
19. 4/
2/
19
2.1/
3/
21
1.7/
3/
17
CO
SAMPLE
ME 1ER/RANGE/PPM
92.8/11/
4bb
2b.8/
3/
b2 3
7b.3/
3/
2031
25.2/
3/
584
CO
BCKGRD
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
.2/11/
1
.1/
3/
2
.1/
3/
2
.2/
3/
5
C02
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PCT
lb.3/ 3/
.2b
27.1/
3/
.44
b3.3/
3/
1.13
lb.4/
3/
.2b
CO?
BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PCT
2.b/ 3/
.OH
2.8/
3/
.0*
2 . b/
3/
.04
3.1/
3/
.05
NOX"
SAMPLE
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
13.3/ 2/
13
33. b/
2/
3*
35.7/
3/
107
13.9/
2/
14
NOX
BCKGRD
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
.8/ 2/
1
.8/
2/
1
.2/
3/
1
1.1/
2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCFNrRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
42.9b
52
454
.22
12.5
2b.12
b4
b02
.40
32.8
10.01
138
1943
1.09
10b.b
41.21
5S
5b5
.21
12.8
HC MASS GRAMS
5.43
7.58
lb . b9
5.82
CO MASS GRAMS
9b.25
143.97
473.95
119.bS
COP MASS GRAMS
73b.1
1515.4
4193.7
715.8
NOX MASS GRAMS
4.55
13.43
44.50
4 . b5
FUEL KG (L0)
.285
(
• b 3 )
.557
(
1.23)
1.574
(
3.47)
.291
(
• b4 )
KW HR (HP HR)
. b4
(
.8b)
1.50
c
2.02)
5.10
(
b.83)
.bS
(
.88)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
8.50
(
b.34)
5.04
c
3.7b)
3.27
I
2,.44)
8.89
(
b.b3)
BSCO G/KH HR IG/HP HR)
ISO.b3
(
112.33)
95.7b
(
71.41)
92.99
(
b9.34)
182.95
(
13b.42)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1152.00
(
859.05)
1007.99
(
751.bb)
822.85
(
bl3.b0)
1094.50
(
81b.17)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
7.12
(
5.31)
8.94
(
b.bb)
B.73
I
b • 51)
7.11
(
5.31)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
,44b
(
.734)
.370
(
. b09)
.309
I
.508)
.445
(
.731)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR)
BSMC G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW Hk (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KH HH (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW MR (LH/HP HR)
PAHTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
7.89 ( 10.58)
"~.SO ( 3.3b)
105.bt ( 78.78)
907 (
(
8.51
.3*3 (
b?7)
b.3H)
.Sb4)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
?(l X en FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
0.000
0.0000 (O.OUOO)
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 (
0.0)
-------
ENGINE NO,
ENGINf MODEL 7? |HC 3*5
ENGINF. 5.7 L(l»? CIO)
CVS NO. 9
BAROMfc TPf? 73g.l?9 MM HGf?9.P9 IN HG)
DRY BKUB TEMP. ??.J» OfG C(73.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NllM«EP
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DTF P MM. H?n(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P mm, H?IH IN, H?0)
BLOWER INLFT TE*P. OEG, C(DEG. F)
SLOwtR REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECOMOS
TOTAL FLOW STt). CM. METRES(SCF)
0
1
ro
in
HC S'MPLF MFiFR/uftNtGf/ppm
HC HCKGPO METf5/PANGF/PPM
CO SAMPLE METFB/PANGE/PPM
CO BC*GWP "FTFR/PAMGfc/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MFTEP/RANGt/PCT
CO? HCKG»P METER/pAnGE/PCT
NO* SAMPLE MFTE»/PANPE/PPM
NO* BC*GRO MfTEP/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NO* CONCENTff4T T ON PPM
HC MASS GPflfS
CO MASS GP#"3
CO? MASS GPAMS
NO* MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (IB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HP)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/Krt H<» (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/Kni HP (LB/HP HP)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS » BAGS
TOTAL KW HP (HP HR1 P,fc» ( 11,St)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 9.H5 ( 7.0*)
nsro G/KW HR (G/Mp HR) J I*0.«»»* (120.01)
BSCO? G/
-------
TABLE D-i
ENGINE MO,
ENGINE MODEL 7? IHC 3*5
ENGINE 5,J IOHS C1D)
CVS NC». «i
84R0METEP 73B.11 mm HP(?1.ni IH HGJ
DRY BULB Tf.vp. ??.? PEG C(72.0 OEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG MIJMfiEP
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF p «m, h?0(IM, H?nj
BLOwEH INLFT P H?0fIN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET TEmp. DEC. CCDEG. F)
BLOwF-H REVOLUTIONS
time SEC0MD5
TOTAL FtdW STO. CU. METPESfSCF)
HC SAMPLE "EIER/PAWGE/PPM
HC BCKGPO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE ^ETER/PANSE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE meteR/RANGE/PCT
CO? PCKC.Pr> METEH/PiNGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE MfTER/RiNRE/PPM
lo NO* BCKGRIJ ME TER/RANGE /PPM
cn
DILUTION factor
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTPATTON PPM
cos concentration pct
NOX CONCENTPATION ppm
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? KASS GPA«S
NOX "ASS GRA«3
FUEL KG (L«l
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/Krt HR (G/Hp HR)
BSCO G/Kn HP (G/HP HP)
BSCO? G/KW HP fG/HP HR)
BSNO* G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR fLB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
B.b7 ( 11,b3)
S.Rb ( *.37)
J55.2B U1S.71)
flfc? ( b*1)
t.,15 ( 5,11)
.31* ( ,583)
TOTAL «W HR (HP HP)
BSHC G/KH HR fG/HP HR)
BSCO G/Kw HP fG/HP HP)
BSC02 G/KH HP fG/HP HP)
BSNOX G/K* HP (G/HP HP)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LR/HP HR)
(CONT'D). TEST 19-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, ll-50**-001
TEST NO,11-2 RUN
DATE it 8/80
TIME 0«
-------
TABLE D-6B. TEST 19-3 EHISSIOHS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.
ENGINE MODEL '3 IHC 3*5
ENG1NF 5.7 ll«5 CID)
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER >*5.»9 mm HG(?q,35 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEWP. 22.2 OEG C(72.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMRER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P mm. H?n(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P "M. h?0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET T?MP, OFG, C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
time SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. ClJ. MfcTRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MfTFR/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGBD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE MfTER/RAVGE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE mftp»/h4ngE/PCT
C02 RCKGRD MFTER/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE MfTEK/RANGE/PPM
to NOX BCKGRO MfTER/RAMGE/PPM
-J
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMg
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HP)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KM HP (G/HP Hft)
B5C02 G/K* HP (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/K* HP (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/K* HP (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * bars
TOTAL KW HR (HP HP)
BSHC G/K« HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/fw HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? fi/k* HR (0/hp HR)
BS^OX 0/K» H» (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/Krt HO f| B/MB HR)
9.7* C 11.72)
10.?R ( 7,bb)
193.5* (ll»,*9)
n*5 ( b3nj
h,*S ( *,bb)
,1«S3 ( »5R0)
COLO TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, U-S0**-001
TEST N0,19»3 RUN
DATE 2/13/80
TIME 08130 GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
DYNO NO, 2 BAG CART NO, 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8,7 GM/KG( bO,7*GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F, ,*370
1 2 3 *
NYNF LANF LAF NYNF
b9b,0 (27,*) 711,2 (28,0) 7b2,0 (30,0) 708,7 C27,9)
*57.2 (18.0) *72,* (18.b) 5*1,0 (21,3) *b* ,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130,0) 5*. * (130,0) 5*,* (130,0) 5*,* (130,0)
7178 8101 833b 7177
272,0 307,0 31b,0 272,0
193.5 ( **82) 20b,8 ( 7303) 211,1 ( 7157) 183,3 ( bH7S)
39,b/ 3/ 3*b lb,0/ 3/ lbO 21,5/ 3/ 215 71,fa/ 2/ 72
1,1/ 3/ 11 1,2/ 3/ 12 1,8/ 3/ 12 10,b/ 2/ 11
38,2/ 3/ 408 3b,7/ 3/ 8b9 bS.B/ 2/ 3*b7 27,b/ 3/ b*2
,1/ 3/ 8 ,1/ 3/ 2 ,2/ 2/ 8 ,7/ 3/ lb
19.5/ 3/ ,31 20,5/ 3/ .47 fel.b/ 3/ 1,09 17,0/ 3/ ,27
2,9/ 3/ ,0* 2,8/ 3/ ,0* 2,8/ 3/ ,0* 8,7/ 3/ ,0*
11,*/ 2/ 11 32.7/ 2/ 33 9*,l/ 2/ 9* 12,7/ 2/ 13
,b/ 2/ 1 ,7/ 2/ 1 ,9/ 8/ 1 ,8/ 2/ 1
30,35
23,52
9,2*
39,29
385
1*9
20*
bl
885
8*5
3330
bl3
,27
.*3
1,0b
.23
10,8
32,0
*3,3
11.*
HO.79
17.71
2*,88
b, *8
189,19
203.*b
818,73
130,92
908.3
lb20,7
*085,b
775,1
3,5b
11.87
35,31
3,92
• *21
(
,"3)
»b29 (
1.39)
1,718
(
3,79)
,31b
(
,70)
.71
(
.<<5)
1.70 (
2,28)
5,bl
(
7.S2)
,73
(
,98)
57,73
(
*3.05)
10.*2 (
7,77)
*,**
<
3,31)
8,89
(
b ,k3)
2b7,7*
(
199,bS)
lH,7b (
89,31)
l*b,00
(
108,87)
179,55
(
133,89)
1285.*5
(
958,5b)
953.99 (
711,39)
728.5b
(
5*3,29)
10b3,01
(
7«. bB)
5,OH
(
3,7b)
b , 99 (
5,21)
b, 30
t
*,b9)
5,37
(
*,01)
,59b
(
,979)
.370 (
,b09)
.30b
(
.50*)
,*33
(
,712)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE PLOW SCM(SCF) 0,000 ( 0,00)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/TEST 0,000
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 0,0000 (0,0000)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL) 0,0000 (0.0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*. SCM(SCF) 0,00 ( 0,0)
-------
TABLE D-6B (CONT'D). TEST 19-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PHOJECT NO. ll-SO*»-OIU
ENGINF NO.
Engine MODEL 7? IHC 3H5
ENGINF 5,7 L(34S C'IH)
CVS NO. q
TEST N0.1H-3 RUN
DATE 2/13/BO
time ouio
PYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
BAG CAR I NO. 1
BAROMFTER 7*5.*1 mm HG(?1.35 IN HK)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
13 PCT
DRY rillLB TEMP. 23.3 OEG C(7>».0 OEG F)
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
7.8 G*/KG(
SH.1
GRAINS/LB)
NoX
HUMIDITY C.F.
.11
BAG RESULTS
HAG MUMHER
1
2
3
4
description
NYNF
lanf
LAF
NYNF
BLOWER OIF P MM. H 2 0(IN. H2U)
blb.n (27.*)
711.2 (28.
n)
7 b 2.0 (30
.«>J
708,7 (27.
1)
HLOWER IHLFT P MM. H?l)( IN. H20)
H57.2 (1B.I1)
*72.H (18.
b)
SU.O (21
.3)
"»bH.8 (18.
3)
HLnwER InLET IEmP. OFG. C(OEG. F)
5*.* (130.0)
5*.f (130
.0)
5H..0
272.0
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
183.5 ( btPl)
20b.7 ( 7302)
211.1 (
7t57)
183.3 ( b»75)
HC SAMPLE HE IF.R/RANRE/PPM
72.1/ 2/ 73
11,1/ 3/
111
21.b/ 3/
21b
70.2/ 2/
7n
HC BCKGRD MFTF.R/WAMGE/PPM
10.5/ 2/ 10
1.1/ 3/
11
1.1/ 3/
11
ll.V 2/
11
CO sample heier/kangE/ppm
12.5/11/ »b4
3b.1/ 3/
87H
bfe.V 2/
3512
2b.7/ 3/
ban
cn hckgkd meier/Range/ppm
1.7/11/ 5
.2/ 3/
5
.2/ 2/
8
.7/ 3/
ib
C02 sample mfier/wange/pct
17.4/ 3/ .28
27.7/ 3/
.*5
bl .2/ 3/
l.Oq
lb.1/ 3/
.27
CO? HCKGRD MhlFR/HANGE/PCT
2.b/ 3/ .0*
2,b/ 3/
.0*
2,7/ 3/
.u*»
2.*/ 3/
.0*
O NO* SAMPLE MElfR/HANGE/PPM
12.b/ 2/ 13
33.5/ 2/
33
IH.b/ 2/
15
12.b/ 2/
13
(J, NOX SCKGRO MEIFR/RANGE/PPM
.7/ 2/ 1
,*/ 2/
0
.1/ 2/
1
1,1/ 2/
1
00
DILUTION F
HC ConCCk
CO COMCEN
Co? CiikiCEn
NO* CONCKN
ACTOR
1M A 11 ON
TRAI ION
TRA JION
IWA) 1 ON
PPM
PPM
PCT
PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CM MASS GRAMS
C"? MASS GRAMS
NOX MA3S GRAMS
FUEL Ki: f L't)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/K*< HK (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR IU/HP HK)
BSC02 G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/Kw HR (G/Hp HR)
HSFC KG/K.k HR CLB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS t HAGS
T01AL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP Hp)
HSC0 G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSCU2 G/KW HK (G/HP HK}
BSNOX G/KK HK (G/HP HW)
HSFC kG/k* HH (LH/HH HR)
to, s*
b3
* 50
.2*
n.i
2*.2b
108
850
.»2
33.1
1,2b
BOb
33Bg
1.05
13.8
31.73
51
513
.23
U.S
B.7K ( 11.7*)
5.81 ( 1. 3*)
1H 3.78 ( 107.22)
R25 ( h15)
h.l« ( t.bl)
.3*7 ( .551)
h , H 3
12.13
25,11
b , 25
lb.13
20^.71
B31.M
12b,h7
B03.2
1S7B.0
fObO,0
7 8H . b
3.82
11.17
3H,b2
3,fe1
.307
(
.bR)
• bl2
(
1.35)
1, 717
I
3,71)
.31b
(
,70)
.71
(
.15)
1.71
(
2.21)
5. bl
i
7.52)
.7*
(
,11)
1,31
(
7.00)
7.S8
c
S.bS)
H.*8
i
3.3H)
8.48
(
b.32)
13h.ns
(
mi.f5)
111.17
(
81.*b)
1*8.30
i
110.51)
171,15
(
128.23)
113h,7b
(
8<»?.b8)
12"*. 7b
(
bfll.51)
72*.00
i
531,81)
10 b5,01
(
71H.1B)
5.tl
(
H.U3)
7.01
(
5.23)
b.17
i
¦».bO)
5.01
(
3,7*)
.•~35
(
.715)
.351
(
.581)
.30 b
i
.503)
.*21
(
.70b)
PARTICULATE DATA,
TOTAL
FOR » BAGS
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE
FLOW
SCM(SCF)
0,000
( o.ou)
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
2/1 X gll FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO»<
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0,000
n.ooun (0,0000)
o.riooo-(o.nooo)
n.nn f o.n)
-------
TABLE D-7A. TEST 20-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
engine rjo.ronn
ENGlftF MUOP.L 72 Funo 300
ENGINE II.II l ( -ti CIO) I-b
CVS MO. 9
BAROfintlt 71li.ht, km HG(29.1f> 1H HG)
dry bulb temp, 22.2 oeg c(72.ii »eg f)
BAG WF.SULIS
hag Nunnth
OESCUPTIDrt
BLOwFK HIF P Mm. H20(IN. H20)
blohfc i»«let p mm. h?o(jn. H20)
BLOkER I'jLET TEMP. OEG. CCOEG, F)
BL(ME» RCVuLUlIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOT AC Ftn*; S lo. C'.J. *ETRES(SCF)
KC SAMPLE HErER/RANGE/Pf*
HC flCKGRD fitTF.R/KANKE/PPP1
CO SAMPLE M£IFR/KANGE/PP*
CO HCKfJKC HF.lER/KANGE/PPM
CO?'SAMPLE HE IFR/HANGE/PCT
CO? HCKGMO METER/RANGE/PCT
O rtOX SAfiPl.F. MrTFP/HANGE/PPrt
to NOX HCIVGRC MEtER/HANGE/PP*
i£>
DILUTION facthk
HC CiiNCCNT IJA | ltjN PPM
CO COrlCENlHA I IUN PPM
CO? Ci.ifcCFNTtlAT ION PCT
nox crvctfUPA r iom ppm
HC 1A5S G«A'!S
co mass gk*hs
CO? MASS GKAHS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUFL KG (LH)
kw m« imp hk)
DSHC G/KH HR (G/HP Hh)
eSCil G/K»« HR (G/hp HH)
EjSCO? G/KK HH (G/HP HR)
hSNOX G/Kw HR (fi/Mp HR)
B5FC K(i/r.4 HK (LH/HP HH)
TOTAL test RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL K* MS (HH HN)
BSHC G/KW hH (G/HP HH)
BSCO G/KW hH {f;/HP H«)
BSCo3 G/K»i llt< (G/HP Hp)
HShllX G/Kw HH (G/HP HfO
BSFt KG/KW (LB/HP HR)
b.3S (
II.18 (
1IIH.H5 (
138 (
III.11 (
.3b1 (
CULD TRANSIENT
TEST NO.20-3 RUN
GATE 1/17/8U
T IMF 09SIMI
DYNO WO. e
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 53 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.2 G'VKG( bl.l
PROJECT NlJ. 11-SOHH-uiU
GASOLINE
BAG CAR• NO. 1
GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .151<1
1 2 3 1
NYNF LANF LAF . NYNF
bib.11 (27.1) 711.2 (28.0) 71,2.0 C30.U) 708.7 (27.9)
157.2 (18.11) 172.1 (18.b) 511.0 (21.3) 1b1.8 (18.3)
51.1 (130.0) 51.1 (130,0) 51.1 (130,U) 51.1 (130.U)
7 Ibb 8(187 8321 71b5
272.11 31)7,(1 31b.0 272.0
182.n ( b127) £05.0 ( 7210) 2(11.3 ( 7312) 181.8 ( b122)
1.27)
.155)
Jl.12 (
ini.2b (
1053.3(1 (
lU.bl (
. 397 (
in.75)
75.51)
785.15)
7.13)
, b5 2)
PARTICULATE DaTa» TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
9[]Mm FILTtH
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED FOrt
multiplier fur
MULTIPLIED FOH
?il X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOw
3.80 I 2.83) 18.58 ( 13.8b)
83.11 I b2.22) 151.01 ( 111.85)
838.21 I (>25.08) 1083.82 { ROB.20)
1U.H I 8.11) 8.11 C b.27)
.301 I .Sill) ,137 ( ,71B)
SCH(SCF)
g/test
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FuFL (G/LB FutL)
SCM(SCF)
0,110(1 I 0,019)
u.uno
u.ooon (u.nuno)
ft.nunn (u.ouoo)
(1.00 ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-7A (CONT'D). TEST 20-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NO.FORD
ENGINE MODEL 72 FORD 300
ENGINE 0,(1 L( -0 CIO) I-b
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*0.bb MM HG(24,lb IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 PEG C(72,0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET f MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU, METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METEh/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
w NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
o
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRAUON PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
COS HASS grams
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP MR)
BSMC G/KW HR CG/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR CG/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/Kh HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KU/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HK)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
b. 30 ( 8,*5)
4.2b ( b,41)
42.71 ( b4,13)
42b ( bin)
11.12 ( B.24)
.3*7 ( .571)
HOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO.20-3 RUN
DATE 1/17/80
time o«mo
DYNO NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5* PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 4,2 GM/KGC b*,5
PROJECT NO, ll-50**-001
GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
GRAINS/LB} NOX HUMIDITY C.F, ,4524
1
NYNF
blb.O (27,*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*,* (130,0)
71b5
272,0
181.4 ( b*2b)
2
lanf
711.2 (28,0)
*72.* (18,b)
St.* (130,0)
808b
307.0
205.0 ( 7239)
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21,3)
5*,* <130,0)
8314
31b,0
204,2 ( 7341)
H
NYNF
708.7 (27,4)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130.0)
71b3
272,0
181,7 ( b*18)
17,4/ 3/ 174
1,3/ 3/ 13
74,2/11/ 357
,4/11/ 3
15,1/ 3/ ,2*
3,0/ 3/ ,05
lb*2/ 2/ lb
1,1/ 2/ 1
13.5/ 3/ 135
1,3/ 3/ 13
84.1/11/ *3*
,S/H/ 3
23.2/ 3/ ,38
2,7/ 3/ ,0*
*0,8/ 2/ *1
1,*/ 2/ 1
13.7/ 3/ 137
1,5/ 3/ 15
5b,0/ 3/ 1343
,1/ 3/ ^
52,1/ 3/ .41
3,5/ 3/ .OS
*0,0/ 3/ 120
,b/ 3/ 2
12,V 3/ 12*
1,*/ 3/ 1*
B5.8/11/ *07
1,6/11/ 5
1**4/ 3/ ,2*
3,1/ 3/ ,05
lb.3/ 2/ lb
,7/ 2/ 1
H5.85
31,00
12,b4
*b , *7
lbb
122
123
110
3*b
*21
13*3
343
.n
.3*
,8b
15,1
3*«.*
118,3
15,b
17.*5
It.*7
1* . B7
11, Sb
73,35
100,*2
327,13
83.11
b*8, 3
12b2,4
3284,2
b31 • 5
5,02
1*,7*
*5,1*
5,17
,258
(
,57)
,*b2
(
1.02)
1,21*
I
2. b8)
.252
(
.5b;)
.5b
<
,7b)
1.2*
(
l.bb)
3.43
I
5.27)
.5b
(
,7lJ)
30,45
(
23,08)
11. b7
C
8,70)
3.78
I
2,82)
20.51
(
15.24)
130.11
(
47.02)
80.4b
(
bO,38)
83.21
I
1.2.05)
1*7,*2
(
104.43)
11*4.48
(
857.5*)
1018.22
(
754,28)
83b,b*
t
b23.88)
1120,07
(
835.93)
8.40
(
b.b3)
11.88
C
8.8b)
11.*8
I
8.5b)
4.17
(
b . 8* )
,158
(
,753)
,373
c
, bl 3)
,304
I
.508)
,**7
(
• ?3*;)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
40MM FILTEk
sample flow scmcscf) 0,000 c o.oo)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/TEST 0.000
MULTIPLIEH FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 0.0000 CO,0000)
MULTIPLIED FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL) 0,0000 £0,0000)
20 X an FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW SCM(SCF) 0,00 ( 0,0)
-------
TABLE D-7B. TEST 20-H EMISSIONS RESULTS-
ENGINE NO.FORO
ENGINE MODEL 72 FORD 300
ENGINE tl.O LC -0 CID) I-b
CVS NO, 9
BAROMETER 7*3.97 MM HG(29,29 IN HG)
ORr BULB TEMP, 81.7 DEG C(7l.O DEG F)
COLO TRANSIENT
TEST NO,80-1 RUN
DATE 1/18/80
time 09ino
OYNO NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 55 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 9,1 GM/KGC b3,1
PROJECT NO. ll-50**-001
GASOLINE EM-8I.7-F
BAG CART NO. 1
GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F. ,9*85
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H80(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H80(IN, H80)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG, F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
b9b,0 (27.»)
*57,8 (18.0)
S*,* (130,n)
71 b5
878,0
188.8 ( b*5b)
2
LANF
711,2 (28,0)
*72,* (18,b)
5*,* (130,0)
8087
307.0
20b,0 ( 727*)
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30.0)
5*1,0 (21.3J
5*,* (130,0)
8328
31b, 0
210,3 ( 7*28)
*
NYNF
708,7 (27,9)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (130.0)
71b5
272,0
182,b ( b*50)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
CO? bckgrd
O NOX SAMPLE
' NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METEH/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPH
OILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRA1 ION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C08 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
50,b/ 3/ 50b
2,1/ 3/ 21
2*1.3/ 3/ bB*
il/ 3/ 2
15.3/ 3/ ,2*
2,7/ 3/ ,0*
11,b/ 2/ 12
1,3/ 2/ 1
37,20
*8b
bbb
,20
in.3
51.11
1*1 .8b
b?8.3
3.*3
,335 (
.55 (
17,1/ 3/ 171
2.1/ 3/ 21
23,7/ 3/ 5*8
,1/ 3/ 2
23,9/ 3/ ,39
2,8/ 3/ ,0*
37»8/ 2/ 38
1,8/ 2/ I
29,19
151
532
,35
3b, b
l7.qo
127,bO
1309.*
13.b9
.?*) ,*9* (
,7*) 1.81 (
l*.b/ 3/ l»b
2.1/ 3/ ei
55,8/ 3/ 1387
,1/ 3/ 2
52,1/ 3/ ."U
2,b/ 3/ .0*
*1,0/ 3/ 123
.3/ 3/ 1
12,b9
127
133b
,87
182,2
15,3b
327,31
3355.*
*b,b2
1.09) 1,235 ( 2,78)
l.b?) 3,93 ( 5,27)
10,2/ 3/ 102
2,0/ 3/ 20
90,*/U/ **5
l.*/ll/ *
1 *,2/ 3/ .82
3.1/ 3/ .05
16,9/ 2/ lb
1.1/ 2/ 1
*8,1*
82
*31
,18
11,8
8,b8
91,78
595,9
*,91
.2*2 (
,5b (
,53)
,7b)
HSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
93.89
(
b9.S7)
1* , 79
(
11,03)
3,91
(
2,91)
15,*0
(
11,*8)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
251,52
(
192.78)
105,*3
(
78.b?)
83,25
I
b2,0B)
Ib2.b9
(
121,32)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
123b,13
(
921,79)
1081,88
(
80b,7b)
853,*b
C
b3b,*3)
105b,9*
(
788,1b)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
b,25
(
* »bb )
11.31
(
8,**)
11,8b
(
8,8*)
8,71
(
b.SO)
BSFC KC/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
,bll
(
1,005)
,*08
(
«b71)
.31*
(
.517)
,*29
(
,70b)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KN HH (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/K« HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
b.25 ( 8,39)
1*.89 ( 11,11)
110,08 ( 82,09)
950 ( 708)
10,98 ( 8,19)
. 3b9 ( .bllb)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
multiplier FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
80 X 20 FILTERS
SANPLE FLOW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtt)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0,00)
0.000
0.0000 (u.oooo)
0,0000 (U.OOOO)
o.ao ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-7B
(CONT'D). TEST 20-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINF NO.FORD
Engine morel 72 ford 300
ENGINE 0,0 L( -0 CIO) I-b
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*3.17 MM HG(21.21 IN HG)
DRY bulb TEMP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG, F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU, METRES!SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
COE SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCI
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
hc mass grams
CO MASS grams
CO? MASS grams
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL Ki; (LB)
KM HR (HP HR)
HSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCU G/KW HR CG/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KH HR (HP HR) b,27 (
8SHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 9,*8 (
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 13.1* (
BSC08 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 1111 (
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 12,** (
BSFC K(J/KH HK (LB/HP HR) .358 (
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, ll-SO**-0Ol
TEST NO.20-* RUN
DATE 1/18/80
TIME 10J20 GASOLINE EM-2b7-F
DYNO NO, 2 SAG CART NO, 1
RELATIVE HUHIDITY 55 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 1,* GM/KGC bS,7 GRAINS/LB) NQX HUMIDITY C.F, ,1571
1
NYNF
b1b,0 (27.*)
*S7,2 (18.0)
5*.* (130,0)
71bb
372,0
188.8 ( b*S7)
II,S/ 3/
1,*/ 3/
78,3/11/
,b/U/
l*,b/ 3/
2,5/ 3/
lb,2/ 2/
,1/ 2/
H5
1*
350
2
,23
,0*
lb
1
2
LANF
711,2 (28,0)
*72,* (18,b)
5*,* (130,0)
808b
30', D
205,1 ( 7273)
12.5/ 3/
1,1/ 3/
10,0/11/
,8/11/
22,*/ 3/
l.b/ 3/
*1,1/ 2/
,1/ 2/
125
11
**2
2
,3b
,02
*1
1
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1.0 (21*3)
5*,* (130,0)
8320
31b,0
210.3 ( 7*27)
13.8/ 3/ 138
,1/ 3/ 1
55.*/ 3/ 137b
.1/ 3/ 2
51,8/ 3/ ,10
2,3/ 3/ .0*
*5.5/ 3/ 13b
,2/ 3/ 1
*
NYNF
708.7 (27,1)
*b*« 8 (18,3)
5*.* (130.0)
7lbS
272,0
182.b ( b*50)
11,3/ 3/
,1/ 3/
85.7/11/
,5/11/
1*.0/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
lb.b/ 2/
,8/ 2/
113
1
*0b
1
• 22
.0*
17
1
*7.02
32.0*
12,78
*1,20
181
11*
130
10*
3*1
*28
1325
31b
,11
.3*
.87
,18
15,3
*0.2
135,1
15,8
11,12
13.58
15,73
10,17
72,53
102.75
32*.53
8*,12
b*1,0
1278.5
33*8,*
blS , 1
5,13
15.18
52,38
5,21
.2b0
(
.57)
,*b8 (
1.03)
1,232
I
2,72)
.2*7
(
.5*)
.55
(
.7*)
1,22 (
l.t>3)
3,1*
(
5,28)
,5b
(
,7b)
3*,8*
(
25.18)
11.15 (
8.32)
3,11
C
2,18)
11,*b
(
1H.51)
132,17
(
18.5b)
8*.37 (
b2.l2)
82,31
(
bl.**)
1*1.21
(
111.27)
1182,b8
(
881.12)
10*1,8b (
782.88)
850,07
i
b33.10)
1011.0b
(
813.bl)
1.35
(
b. 17)
12.*7 (
1,30)
13.30
i
1.12)
1,31
(
7.O0)
.*73
(
.778)
,38* (
,b31)
,313
(
.51*)
.*37
(
.711)
PARTICULATE DATA r TOTAL FOR * BAGS
8. *1)
7.07)
b1,*b)
701)
1,28)
,578)
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
2a X PO FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUfcL)
SCM(SCF)
0,000 ( 0.00)
0,000
0,0000 (0,0000)
o.aooo (o.oooo)
0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABLE D-8A. TEST 21-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO 1KANSIfcNT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
RGI'T
[' I NGIf <
" rM*!"!
CVS *r.
¦.
.'1
TEST NO. 21-1 HUM
r:
r
l:
rv
r:~
r.
r:.:
r.:~
r;;:
I
w
w
'¦ 'UK L
•> ~ '
7i J!«C_iO«i
r.Ti i
oa t t a?.bi ao
TlCt 09:00
GASOLINE EH-267-F
DYNO MJ.
BAG CART NO.
P.i#C»"T!
ovy" rui ¦-
/ ¦ i . ,i
-3) ! 1 IK. )
RELATIVE HUHI01TY 48. PCT
I :
' I
,(/!.*< i»t 0 H
AKjliLUT£ HUMIDITY 7.7 GH/KG( 54.1 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUHIOITY C.F. .9107
RAG ffMinS
Rio mi"' :
in* w : ,u ! *i'"
fli HVi * ! ! t P
Pirvp | a. l
pi hs! I'-t.i 1
I'l'WK rfvr;iv
Tirr "si
TPT AL f I. !'¦>¦ 11
I /I'H'I. HAM
V' i''.
', 1.1 i.. i. i•;< c. i
1
2
3
4
NY NF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
696.0 <27.41
711.2 (28.0)
762.0 (30.0)
708.7 (27.9)
457.2 ( 1(1.01
472.4 ( 18.6)
541.0 (21.3)
464.8 (18.3)
1
54.4 <130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
7177.
8101.
8335.
7177.
2 71.9
307.0
316.0
272.0
C.U. ••ilI'iMVCF)
185.0 < 6535. )
208.5 ( 7363.)
212.9 ( 7519.1
18*1.8 ( 6529.)
HC
S i
"! T: 1 n Aii'j!. ttv?
16.7/ 3/
167.
85.1/
2/
85.
17.8/
3/
178.
61.4/ 2/
61.
HC
'•( rt . /-.a;.ijv
2.1/ 3/
21.
19.2/
2/
19.
2.0/
3/
20.
19.0/ 2/
19.
cr
s •, y i i
ril!-/ - /•!.'< 1. / H t' '¦
24.6/ 3/
570.
24.8/
3/
574.
89.2/
3/2501.
84.5/11/
396.
cn
;> CH;mi
'¦*ii '¦ / A 11 f1
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/
3/
2.
.1/
3/
2.
2.0/11/
6.
c,v?
S'fjM
* ! 1 •' ' /'-pVi 'ji / i' C I
20.2/ 3/
.33
28.1/
3/
.46
56.2/
3/
.99
16.8/ 3/
.27
nv
»C n
M 11 ¦/, t.r.'J( /HCT
2. ti/ 3/
.04
: 2.6/
3/
.04
3.0/
3/
.05
2.5/ 3/
.04
M'v
S^r'l. !
• i I • - / -./.tj'ji /i'i'rt
13.2/ 2/
13.
33.4/
2/
33.
96.0/
2/
96.
12.8/ 2/
13.
r.nx
nc-r.-'i;.
vi T1- * / '•• /P C h
-.6/ 2/
1.
.6/
2/
1.
.9/
2/
1.
1.0/ 2/
1.
./
nuuriw i f.< n ..
Hr ui'i -ill ('.* r
CP Cii'-T * h\ * a I !
CO/' COM".' »:T - I I i'CI
Nf x c"M' i,;. ppV
33.71 ,s
14 7.
25.*5
10. 74
42.85
67.
160.
43.
565.
.2 tt
558.
. 4 2
2413.
383.
.95
.23
12.6
3a2. 8
95.2
11.8
r
r_
HC S
CO WAV,
C02 "Sis
ts'py v as •,
ruii f.,
Kir !it: (!t
'psmc c,/v
PSCIV <¦/
PS MIX x />
• Sf c
»)
¦ i K
(i. r
i> I-
ft" •>
A ¦'
*• ¦" 1
t > s"
)
)
__15.65
119.61
8.01
19.63
4.57
_960 . 5_
4.0?
135.56
1617.9
598.13
82.37
3688.7
780.1
11.92
35.30
3.81
.3 76 I
.57 ("
.6 3)
.7 7)'
.585 (
1.29)
1.479 (
3.26)
.291 (
.64)
1.42 t
1.911
4.71 I
6.31)
.65 (
.87)
I'-./HrJi-:
"j It*) ' ,
(i
(i, / i t- iikI
; i ¦ r'v ;ii.)
27.39 t 20.421
5.64 (
4.21)
4.17 (
3.11)
7.07 I
5.27)
20V.J? t 156.13)
Ti.Sl.2b (12 bi .71)
95.42 ( 71.15)
127.11 ( 94.78)
127.42 I 95.02)
113b.78 ( 849.19)
783.88 ( 584.54)
1206.69 I 899.83)
7. UJ_ 5.31)
.661 ( 1.08 7)
_8.39_(_
.412 I
6.26)
.677)
7.50 (
5.59)
5.89 (
4.39)
.314 (
.517)
.451 (
.741)
TOT A I. Tc S T
PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FUR 4 BAGS
t, / " '•
TPTAI.
FSIT
rsci1 c./v
R^rr!' r/-
?SV"C '• I ¦
o',rr ••r.r.
lu <:.j i..j
t . ,1'A r- H" )
t •./»• r i'.- >
t'.nw . i
imi- i'.. ;
C'/i.
>.:¦ )
<.i'- < ^•3^'
. '•> 4. B<>)
1/ / .4 0 ( >'5.001
>> ( lit..)
t 5.5'«)
. u: i )
VOMM FILTER
S AflPLK ~F LOW
flULT lP"Lit« FOR'
SCfUSCF)
G/TEST
0.000 ( 0.001
0.000
/o
MULTIPLIER FOP.
« ui__T I P LJL t K ~ f L)Vv
X d-) F 1L TEkS
S*1i»Ut FLU S"
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
0.0000 (0.0000)
G/KG FUEL (C/L8 FUEL) 0.0000 (0.0000)
SCfMSCF)
0.00 (
0.01
-------
TABLE D-8A (CONT'D). TEST 21-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
FNGINF
E NT, !';F"
FNGTf.F
CVS >,r.
mi. yj
rM!Pf L
. r.' i < > '•
')
TfcST NO. 21-1 RUM
1 l4_
-it,)
_D ATE 2/25/80
Tirt oq:4 hc-iin nr.)
RtLATIVt HUMIDITY
48. PCT
nPY «M.P T: v. t i L'! (i i-)
AHSULUTt HUH 10 I TV
8.1 GM/KG(
56.6 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.9204
1
ere. prsci.Ti
I
R AG f
1
2
3
4
orsL'f in i u.v
NY NF
LA NF
LAF
NYNF
I.. .
p.invTP r>:i f- m> . turn
696.0 (^7.41
711.2 (28.
0)
762.0 (30.0)
708.7 (27.
91
RlP«' !!aM IN. il
457.? (lb.01
472.4 (IB.
fa)
541.0 (21.3)
464.8 (18.
3)
1
Ptr.i.fP I M-T T i '. f*. iiU,. U'JtO. F)
54.4 (130.OJ
54.4 (130
.0)
54.4 1130.0)
54.4 (130
.0)
1'lCi.ri f : vi;i..UTl:;f,s
7177.
8100.
8335.
7177.
1.
TIi*F
272.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
TOTAL ft'), ST!'. (A.. ? 1 I -. ( S ( •> C F )
16b.1 ( 6 53 7.)
208.5 ( 7365.)
212.9 ( 7521.
)
184.9 ( 6531.
)
1
t
hc s fi t«. ;•/?.'.?«#» /#»»>«
78.V/ It 7<>.
79.4/ 2/
79.
17.3/ 3/ 173.
66.4/ 2/
66.
1
MC nrt"- -M; ¦ t i i •:/; /fl't'
16.8/ 2f 17.
18.0/ 2/
18.
1.8/ 3/ 18.
17.9/ 2/
18.
cr! S'-*PL; M • K Af.'.i / r-pr
69.8/11/ 2G'<-) II 1' / -'AS.'-.t /t'CI
2.5/ 3/ .04
2.9/ 3/
.04
2.4/ 3/ .04
,
2.9/ 3/
.04
D
ri
Ntl> "> Arp L i v! I • >¦ /,: \ K1 (_,! / p I-
13.4/ 2/ 13.
35.5/ 2/
36.
32.8/ 3/ 98.
13.6/ 2/
14.
k-CX ncn;:-i) mi n//ppr
.7/ 2/ 1.
.7/ 2/
1.
.3/ 3/ 1.
.8/ 2/
1.
(
DILUTION FAtT'!1
42.39
26.30
10.65
40.38
HC cr!NU-: !«K IWh1 Hi-. 1
103.59 ( 77.25)
80.03
( 59.68)
126.60 (
94.40)
125.07
<
93.261
PSCiv r./t.' u./iiP
13H2.17 (1030.68)
1069.30
{ 797.37)
799.64 ( 596.29)
1243.48
( 927.27}
r...
fSMix cr«.<- i'- nj!i? tin)
t.'iH I 5.20)
8.72
( 6.50)
7.76 (
5. 79)
6.31
(
4.701
RSft T/K-.' M-' 1 L 11 / rt i1 !KI
.49» ( ,81V)
.382
( .628)
.319 1
.524)
.462
(
.759)
TnT At T'ST k •' >i;l. f
TCT *L *>¦ '¦
PSHC
Psrr
nsr.(.v
KSM'V
psfi:
C/f.lr
(,/K.
*.! K >•
f, / • -
K !,/<,¦.
('II1
I'll
t' ¦
fy.
'• t-ACi
<1.7 HP"
(0 /1'.;
If. Air
(;,/ i
t iI
7.4 3
V. 19
i i•>. '.a
TVi.
/. It,
.
').<)?)
J . H 7 )
Hfi.fltf )'
700. 5
«>. /'.'J
. t> fi V »
'JoriMTiLttR
iSM?irTLT5w ^
"multiplier for
" MtOlPLlfcR FOft
rtUL TI PL I £ ft F OS
20 X 20 fILIfcRS
SA;t»»Lt FLOW "
0.000 <—0.00)
SCHtSCFl
C7TEST
C7R« HiTTC7ffP tfJH
"G/ko "FuE'CI'C/'L'B" FuFTJ 0.0000 CO.OTOZJF
0.000
0.0000 10.0000)
ScmTSCFT
o.oo c
0.0)
-------
TABLE D-8B. TEST 21-2 EMSSIOMS RESULTS
COLO TRAMStENI
.PR 0JECT_NO. 11-5 o 44-0 OJ._
FNGIfiF Nfi. 21
fcNGRF trlJCVL 711HC 30*.
I NCINF S.O LI 10'.. C It))
CVS Nr. '»
TEST NO. 21-2 RUN
DATE 2/26/80
J I BE 08 : Vo_
DYNO NO. " 2
GASOLINE EH-267-F
BAG CART NO.
\PAVDMUP 753.K7 v HG I 2*5 . 6B 1 HC ) _
psy pulp u«p. 21.7 i:*r. cm.o hkIi
f .
PAC KE Slit TS
• RAG »W:f ».
Cf SCRIPTHJ«.
Rr.LATIVE HUM 101T Y_A6._PCI
ABSOLUTE HUH 1 PITY 7.4 GH/KGt 51.7 GRAINS/LBI
_NOX „HU?UDI TY_. C,F. ,9011.
in
1_
NYNF
2
LA NF
3_
tAF
KYNF
f
"LOxfR L> I F
P r.r. H2fHIf.. H2U)
696.0 (27.4)
711.2 I 28
.0)
762.0 (30.0)
708.7 (27.9)
«LCV.fK IMF I P H2lJ(l«. H20)
457.2 (18.0)
472.4 ( 16
.6)
541.0 (21.3)
464.8 (18.3)
i
PLOvTS IMFT Tt.S'. DtG. CliJEG. F)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
ric.-
:1 k 1^ f VCLVJT i i;ns
7178.
aioo.
8334.
7175.
,
Ttfr
S F C C v 1 j S
272.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
TOTAL FLTU
STD. tu. MI»>tS(iCH
185.7 ( b559.)
209.2 ( 7389.)
Z13.6 ( 7545.)
185.5 I 6550.)
]
t'C
S A ."PL?
*"FTf/l,ANCF /PPf
24.5/ 3/ 245.
87.3/ 2/
87.
17.1/ 3/ 171.
56.7/ 2/ 57.
;
HC
(iCKGVf)
fTTf K/MANCF/PP«
1.3/ 3/ 13.
12.4/ 2/
12.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
12.7/ 2/ 13.
cc
S/m'LF
MtTtK/PANGl /PP.1,
29.8/ 3/ 696.
23.7/ 3/
548.
86.0/ J/2371.
82.9/11/ 384.
i
CO
P.CkGT
~" 1 TTK/F' AfiGt /PPK
.1/ 3/ 2.
.1/ 3/
2.
.3/ 3/ 7.
2.6/11/ 8.
cc?
SO rPLf
ff IIH/KANCl /PCT
19.7/ 3/ .32
28.0/. 3/
.46
56.9/ 3/ 1.00
17.3/ 3/ .28
I
CO?
ncKr.fi)
fl Tt'R/RANGl /PCT
2.5/ 3/ .04
INj
•
h-
>
.03
2.7/ 3/ .04
2.5/ 3/ .04
9
Nrix
S\^PL'
MS TI H /~ A KG I- / t*P f
13.6/ 2/ 14.
37.0/ 2/
37.
34.8/ 3/ 104.
14.0/ 2/ 14.
i U)
KO X
[iCKC.n
rt TFt. /PANGc/PPH
.6/ 2/ 1.
.2/ 2/
0.
.1/ 3/ 0.
.5/ 2/ 1.
OlLUTIOfi f ACTl!K
HC CONCt NTKATIIIN PPH
co cufjcrstpamun ppfi
CO? Ct!fji:r nth at i!: m pci
MIX COttCFN1HATION PPM
32.75
232. "
*600.
.28
25.65
75.
10.73
158.
533.
.43
2292 .
.96
4 1.95
Mi.
369.
.24
13.0
36.8
104.1
13.5
hc cass c.»A"S
Cfi "ASS GKArS
CC2 "ASS (,P A>>S
nc* .vass
FUEL KG (LP J
KW ti» (HP HP 1
F SMC G/K'- hf i 0/ HP MM)
FSCO G/KV H°. If;/HP HP.)
fSf02 G/K* H^ (G/HP H>.j
PSNOX f./K> H« IC/HP (1R)
f: S F C Kf/K« (IK/HP UK I
TtjtAt TEST FMULIS 4 HAGS
24.89
] 46 . 9 7
9.10
TUTAL Kt. M>< (MP H'l
KSHC G/*W
PSCl' G/K.<
PSCO? G/«*
PS!>fr G/K'a
HP
(i".
HH
HK
( G/HP
10/MP
(G/HP
( G/H?
Mf.)
H- )
H« )
MJ. 1
S'SFC KG/K» H-: I LB/HP t. 17_
.397
• 5V
129.83
16 45.0
13.27
19.50
570.15
.8ft >
\ 79)
.5 9 2 (
1.48 (
_1._31)
1.99)
3771.8 _
36.34
1*491 <
4.74 I
3.29)
6.36)
4.74
79.70
811.1_
_ 4.32"
__»300 X
_.68 I
.66.L
.51)
42.45_( 31.66)
250.6b C_186.92)
162iVlq_ (1208.9 21
7.U'"l 5.30)
.670 ( *1.114)*
6.14 ( 4.58)
__87.67 ( 65.3B)
1110.82 C 828.34i
8.9b ( 6.68)
.400 (
.657)
4.11 ( 3. 01) 7 . 00__( 5.22)_
_117. 80__( . _8_7. 84)_
_l 198.91 ( 894.02 L
. 6.38 _( 4.76 L
__ .443. ( . 729)
J20.J0 ( 89.63)_
795. 19 ( J>_qZ .9 7)
8.08 (
.314 (
6.03)__
517)
PAR liCULA fO*'AU OT AC FOB 4 BAGS"
I.',') I 10.04)
7.7f riVflor
12 3.77 (92.29)
959. ( 715.j
(< . (' 3 ( 5 .991
.J7i ( .<>iot
90HH FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW"'"
MULTIPLIER FOR
li'JL T1 PL i £K FOR
MULTIPLIER FCR
20 X 20 F ILTtPS
SA.-PLE FLOW SCM t S CF I
SCK(SCF) _
G/TEST * 1_ _
G/KU HR lc/HP HRJ
G/KG FlitL" (G/LB FUEL)
__0.000 ( 0.00)
_0.006 __
0.0000 (0.0000)_
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 (
0.0)
II
-------
TABLE D-8B (CONT'D). TEST 21-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
ENGINE HH. 21
rNCINI rrtif l_ >3
FNGIfT. 5.0 L(3C«>.
CVS NO. <)
nj.c :)<)<.
a 0)
TEST_NO_. „2 W
OATt 27? 6/80
T IM Ol: 00
D YNO NO.
RUN
GASOUNE EH—267—F
• 1
BAG CART NO.
P AftOft TI * 7 S1 .31 ?r
D«Y liL'Ll II f P. 71.7
ItGl l-> . 5h IN HC)
nvc u/i.o 01 r. F )
RELAII VEHUNIDI T Y 46. PC T
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.5 Gf/KGI
52.GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .9040
RAG "USULTS
I AC NICPF-'
l,fSC«IPIIUN
BLOMR fj IF P
?.LCWB 1'ILFT
H OF" IMFI
PLC/ fp pcvclui h;ns
T IfI Sf COf;HS
H:"-. H?i)(IN. H2U)
? (I". 11/i; I IN. H2U >
Tl ' P. '
0(0. C ( Of. G . t-I
TOTAL FLl!.- S TIJ - CU. TTRf.StSCF )
l_
NY NF
69b.0 (27.4)
<•5 7 .2 (18.0)
_54.4 I 130.0>
7174.
272.0
184.9 ( 6532.)
LANF
J711.2 I 28.0)
472.4 118.6)
54.4 (130.01
8 097.
307.0
208.4 ( 7360.)
LAF
762.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8332.
316.0
212.8 ( 7516.)
NYNF
_708._7 _<27 .9) _
464.8 <18.31
54.4< 130.0)
7173.
272.0 _____
184.7 ( 6525.)
0
1
u>
cn
I'C
S A w P L F.
f f TtA/RAVGi /PPr
75.9/ If
76.
81.5/ 2/
82.
17.3/
3/ 173.
57.8/ 2/
58.
HC
nr.KGsi)
ylTFtf/HANGt/PPK
14.8/ 2/
15.
15.5/ 2/
16.
1.5/
3/ 15.
15.7/ 2/
16.
CP
SAVPLf-
yy tfr/^angi/ppn
71.3/11/
303.
95.1/11/
488.
86.5/
3/2398.
82.0/11/
377.
cc
i'.CKC'O
frTEk/PANGi-/PPM
.2/11/
1.
.5/11/
1.
.2/
3/ 5.
1.4/11/
4.
en/
SA.-'.PL !
.vl Tt t/UNG1 /PL 1
17.5/ 3/
.28
27.1/ 3/
.44
56.5/
3/ .99
17.5/ 3/
.28
C(.V
i'CKGkD
Ci Tf t'/PANGF/PCr
2.6/ 3/
.04
2.5/ 3/
.04
2.6/
3/ .04
2.5/ 3/
.04
f»PX
SAfr'LK
Tl >¦ / AMji /PPH
14.0/ 2/
14.
, 39.2/ 2/
39.
35.2/
3/ 106.
14.1/ 2/
14.
NPX
f'CKGRO
f f TT-k/RANGl/PPM
.5/ 2/
I.
.6/ 2/
I.
.1/
3/ 0.
.6/ 2/
1.
PILUTIO'J F ' C TU-
HC CUNCl. NTRATIliN PPt^"
CO CCINCF Nir-AT I UN PPI-i
CIV CllNO NT P A T Ii;N PC T
MIX CONCINTKATION PPM
HC r"ASS GPA.«S
CD "ASS GR A 1S
CI!? fASS GWA.^S
KOX v AS S GRANS
FUfL KG (LHI
KV. H3 (HP HH )
42. 31
61 j ~
296.
.24
26. 80
10.78
67.
159.
j4 75._
.41
2312.
.96
13.5
38.6
105.3
366.
13.5
6. 55
63.81
815.1
.2 95" (
.61 (
8.00
115.76"
15 55.2
13.92
19.56
572.97
*.53
78.66
.65)
.82)
.555 (
1.50 (
i.22)_
2.02 )
37 32 .1_
38.76
1. 4 80 J
4.74 (
3.26)
6.35)
819.4 __
_
.302 (_
.67 (
• 67J
.90)
PSHC G/KU HP (r./HP He )
PSCU G/K HK ( G/ HP HR)
BSCC? C/KW Hk (g/HP Hk)
PSNPX G/<~ H« (C/HP ilk)
P.5FC KG/KV h''. (LP/MP HR)
TOTAL T£ST vtSULTS '» "AGS
10 . 7 6_( 8 . 0 3)
104.80 ( 78.15)
1338.6 3 (_998.22)
7.10"( 5.29)
.485 ~( " .797)
5.32 (
3.97 )
76.62 (_ 57.14)
J.034. 45 ( 7 71.39)
9.26 ( 6^901
. 36 9" ( .607)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
4.13 (
3.08 )_
120.99 ( 90.22)
788.06 ( 587.66)
6.77 (
8.18 (
.312 I
6.10)
.514)
5.04JL
117.58 ( _ 87.68J_
JL224.70_913.27L
6.45 j 4.81)
.451 ( .742)
TOTAL Kl. (HP Hrt)
PSHC
pscr,
BSC02
(JSu:x
8SFC
C/K A
f./KW
r./x*
li/K*
M./KK
HR
HI*
HP
llv'
l.i-
(G/HP
(G/MP
(G/HP
( G/hP
( LI'/HP
7. '>? < 10.0«)
HR )
!<,? )
HR)
HK t
H» )
5.14
1 I 0. 50
0.16
• 3 50
90HH FILTER
( 3.83)
( 82.40)
(607.r
( ~ A.OS)
i . 5 7f>) "
20
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTI PL IE R F OR
MULTIPLIER "FOR"
MULTIPLIER FOR
X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLOW
S CM(SCF)_
G/TEST
G/KW HR (jG/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LBFUEL)
SCW(SCF )
0.000 (
0.000
0.00)
0.0000 (0.00001^
0.0000 (0.0000)
0.00 (
0.0)
-------
TABLE D-9A. TEST 22-3 HUSSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. 11-50AA-001
TEST NO. 22-
3 RUN
rf-l. IM L / ' I,»-C Jfid
DATF 3/12/00
i '.cin> ' i ( if -i. :: n.\l v-r
TIHf 9:00
GASOLINE EH-
26 7—P
CVS f-:). /
DYNO NU.
2
BAG CART NO. 1
SftarrYffs 7 1 ^ 7 I/ii. i? I 'J HI.)
RELATIVE HUHIDITY
51. PCT
(/-Y ,:i.i ¦ i» u»/:>.o bit i i
A3SULUIE H0MID1TY
9.1 GH/KGI
63
.7 GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.9A98
« a r- -1 •» 11 t s
't.t MjM-t '
1
2
3
A
fl 1 .* 1 P f.
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
iiif t' ivd)
6<>fc.O 127.^)
711.2 128.
01
762.0 130.0)
708.7 127
.9)
1 L' ' -. !'LU >' . »i/l ( Ifj. M/li )
A57.2 (le.O)
A 72.A 116.
61
5AL.0 (21.3)
A6A.8 (18
.3)
Vll'V''-. : 1 I Tif.p. Clt. ClulG. F )
b't.'i (130.0)
5A.A 1130
.0)
54.A <130.0)
5A.A (130.0)
11 i>.i ¦- -i v:;i li H i s
716 B .
8089.
8320.
7165.
TIM Sr'.TilS
272.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
P t f.| 1.1;. U.I SIS LF )
lfiO.'t 1 6373.
1 t'1
203.3 ( 7179.
)
207.A < 7327.
)
180.2 ( 636A.
)
It S.'.frlJ >'i 1 « /I J V.j! /i1 l'
2^.8/ 3 f 2t>8.
17.3/ 3/ 173.
27.1/ 3/ 271.
89.7/ 2/
90.
!•( .«Cr «."V 18 » /kANM. /PP*
1.2/ 3/ 12.
1.3/ 3/
13.
l.A/ 3/ 1A.
1A.2/ 2/
1A.
Ci: ^M't 1 M I' - /i'P«
42.6/ 3/1020.
A 1.9/ 3/100A.
76.7/ 2/A332.
2A.A/ 3/
565.
( (• re-. (•• '¦ T« »/• AMil /.'Pi:
.2/ 3/ 5.
.2/ 3/
5.
.2/ 2/ 8.
.A/ 3/
9.
cr- "( i' r /^t:i
20.6/ if .33
32.6/ 3/
. 5A
66.0/ 3/ 1.18
18.3/ 3/
.29
U.V 1 i:-'i f i It iv f Mr.;/i\i :;«i li;-. pp-i
1000.
973.
*
,A155.
5AA.
CfV I.i '«T' T l»:u PCi
.29
.50
1.1A
.25
Mn> i:i!M.i-"jTpAni'.% ppr»
. 13.3
33.3
85.2
12.1
HC y: 'i ( •' s
2b. (i*.
18.83
30.95
7.89
cr v••••;•-. i-'
210.14
230.28
1003.7A
11A.08
ri ?
wiA.a
1872.3
A336.2
819.1
f.ny »-a', ,
A.37
12.31
32. 13
3.98
fl'!'. ft. II;)
• A 3A I
.90)
.723
(
1.59)
1.895 X
A.16)
.323
(
.71)
h, t ; >
.63 I
.S3)
1.61
I
2.16)
5.26 (
7.05)
• 6A
(
.86)
?si-t r,/".- h !'•)
AO.AA I
30.15)
11.69
{
8.72)
5.89 (
A.39)
12.29
(
9.17)
PSfl; C,/". r. (!":/(•,' II- )
331.37 I 2A7.101
1A2.95
( 106.60)
190.98 I 1A2.A2)
177.85
I 132.62)
l; j C7 1,c . -1- )
1S21.30 1113A•AA I
1162.2A
( 866.69)
825.06 ( 615.25)
1276.89
( 952.18)
f»V.;»v, r./K/. *¦. £;:./(•? '¦'!¦)
6.0V I
5.1A)
7.6A
(
5.70)
6.11 {
A.56)
6.20
(
A . 62 )
Pjfi ' i./- f. t! .'/CP H.< }
• f > U A I
1.126)
. A A9
<
.738)
.361 (
.593)
.503
(
.827)
TflTM it *i 1 /• : ' C* PAKTICULATE UATAt tOT*L FOR V BAGS
TOin > - I-l • • J ~ <•!<. ( 10.92)
PSK G/"> W I¦&") " < 7.63)
i •>¦«/. t in. )
'¦ %M> * >/:¦¦ <¦> I ¦¦¦ I A». (
-------
TABLE D-9A (CONT'D). TEST 22-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-
5044-001
1
rNO]'.' N't.
,>;•
TtST NO. li-3 RUN
fVGTM "11!;
i I
? ! 1'.! ( >>. (
OtTf 3/12/80
1 M.1M (.O
i. (
ir. ii:)
Tirt 9:40
GASOLINE EM—267-
-F
1
tvs f t!.
OVNO NOw 2
BAG CART NO.
1
'
aurmTi? r
!•<.
'•7 itG C £ •! »9« I ,' HGI
RELATlVt HUHI01TY 49. PCT
I"
nvv i t.t •> r.
i;t G CI /J.-J !;(. r, F)
ABSULUTE hUHIDlTr 8,7 GM/KGC 61.2
GRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
.9391
,
WAR
!'Al ' l' >
1 2
3
4
L' IC!!-1
I IN
NY NF CANF
LAF
hYNF
i
i tri v k :
1.
y> •¦¦¦¦•. tvoti.s. ii/'i)
696.0 (27.4) 711.2 (28.0)
762.0 1.30.0)
708.7 (27
.9)
i-1 f»i -
V, 1
1 P v v . . i' <:'U I
457.2 (18.0) 472.4 118.6)
541.0 (21.3)
464.8 (18
.3)
1
nr.?" i
'¦1 t
I !l'i'. 'IK.. 1)
54.4 1130.0) 54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130.0)
!!.(.. ! '
1 V(
LMT H'f j
7167. 0090.
8322.
7166.
I
Ti fi srr
;:m.
">
272.0 307.0
316.0
272.0
Tt'T H ! L
r
>ii;. i:u. Miffiiscf)
180.4 ( 6372.) 203.3 t 7180.)
207.5 ( 7329.)
180.2 ( 6365.1
i
M. S.'"?
i «
-1 it—/;- a n c. t / p p r
93.0/ 2/ 93. 13.5/ 3/ 135.
26.5/ 3/ 265.
77.3/ 2/
77.
I'C tiy:
."I T' A',(.! /I'pf
12.5/ 2/ 13. 1.2/ 3/ 12.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
12.0/ 2/
12.
( ;! s a f
l.i
f; 1: r> f- m i / p i> r
2 3.5/ 3/ 543. 37.7/ 3/ 895.
76.2/ 2/4290.
97.3/11/
509.
C(. :: f I,
"ITT K f f
.1/ 3/ 2. .1/ 3/ 2.
.2/ 2/ 8.
3.9/11/
11.
cr.: r~
11
•¦'I' U •
18.3/ 3/ .29 30.2/ 3/ .50
65.6/ 3/ 1.18
17.8/ 3/
.28
rr .s i . ( i-c
M Ti K / A M, I /PCI
2.3/ 3/ .04 2.2/ 3/ .03
2.6/ 3/ .04
2.3/ 3/
.04
O M'X 1 " •'
1 i
vl li V/w AM,! /I'P."!
12.8/ 2/ 13. 33.1/ 2/ 33.
88.4/ 2/ 88.
13.8/ 2/
14.
i m-x
oo
': i
f v Tt ~ /'• /Pt r
1.8/ 2/ 2. 2.0/ 2/ 2.
2.0/ 2/ 2.
1.8/ 2/
2.
r
rum
IT dir.
c:: f t-r-.
(i. <¦ ' '¦
int.
r.i
t m:
T -
'.IP
I '•
T k
11^
a 11
At i
;•. T i
A11
I:*
Vr.
i'l"
pp.'
;n. :
3?. 71
"Ik"
529."
" "".26"
li.o
22. 34
'870.
.4 7
8.30
39.18
254.
66.
4118 •
1.14
487.
.25
31.2
86.6
12.0
MC "ANS fv,
C«» >'n. vi-fi'<\ ^ ^
CI"? r; w- a—, "
l i - ''ASS '."A"',
f U! I '"( (t 1
W: >- (iff' ! V ) ~ "
rsi t c/k •• i~^*"t«:/»ft>_V
S 11" I) ft »-r l (,/llP iu }
rsci.z «;/k . ¦ t t./s-.p 'f
.SM') i:i |
i2
054 . 7_
3.58
14.48
205,96"
30.45
6.62
995.04
102.18
17 39.1
11.3 9
4332.2
32.30
826.0
3.90
.333 L
.66 (
?_73L
.841
.665 I
1.471
1.889 (
4.16)
.318 (
.70)
1.60 ( 2.14)
5.27 (
7.07)
.64 (
.86)
12.68 1
9.461
9.07 (
6.77)
5.78 (
4.31)
167.6 7 _(_ 12 5.03)
"_12 8(_j?60 . 88 f
5.4 0 ( 4.0J)
.502 1 .825)
_ 129. 02 _l **6.21^
1089.3V ( 812.36)
7.14 I 5.32)
.416 ( .685)
188.61 ( 140.79)
10.63 ( 7.93)
159.29 I 118.78)
822.03 ( 612.99)
"4757)
1267.64 ( 960.20)
6j. 13 C_
.358" (
6.08 (
4.53)
.589)
.495 (
.815)
TOTAL 1 i *; I
;r>T,u r.
r ¦> i <
!"SC»V
::sm'x
'.1,1 IS
t- I'-H .'-I
' ('• j
PART iCULATE" DATA, f UT At F UR 4 BAGS
!./f »
I./- ,•
,/' •
f
t
U'/kp
t l ,/lr
Ml )
I! ' )
11* i
Hi. j
f-SfC t- I.II /KI- h-:J
»;.l/ ( 10,'X.)
f. S'j ( 5. 4V)
l/l.uv (1/9.0Ij)
I 70 7.)
t'f/U ( '(./>/)
.392 ( .(.45)
90f1f1 ULTEk
SAMPLE ft. Oh
fiu'-TiPLitk Fur
5C?ilS ~CF)
cm st
MULT iPLltk FUR G/KW HR "I C/HF Hfc)
<5.000 t—0.06)
0.000
~e.woo (o.oooor
f-UL fI?L!t K FOR c/kis FUEL CG/tB FUfCT 6.^"00"T A • L V Ull,
SO i i'cf V
-------
TABLE D-9B. TEST 22-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
r~
U..
C
r:.
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11— 5044-001
'
tt i, IM v;*.. ¦>/
TEST
NO. 22-4 RUN
Ff.&If.i flli.JL Ti tkC jx,"
DATE
3/17/80
{ ?.'¦ p.t b.f. i m««.. ciri v-*)
Tir.E
0 V: 00
GASOLINE Efl-267-F
C.V>
DYNO NO.
GAG CART NO.
hC l I.< ftC i
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 52. PCT
fi>'V t- u >¦ li !•.
* S / * <* I ¦ t 0 01 (» F)
ABSOLUTE VUMIDITY
8.9 Gtt/KG( 62
.1 ORA INS/LB )
NOX HUH10ITY C.F.
.9430
1
! s•_t T -
1
F AI M;," .' '
I
2
3
4
1 1 s- I H T i i
h
NYNF
LANF
LAF
h YNF
1
r ?*. t'Si.(tn. mut
457.2 (18.CJ
472.4 (18
.6)
541.0 (21.
3)
464.8 (18.
3)
J"""
nCM".' !' L
i 1 i' • f . hi r ntt,. F I
54.4 I13C.0)
54.4 (130.0)
54.4 (130
.0)
54.4 (130
.0)
»at v f < v' v 111_ t i "f.s
716V.
8091.
8322.
7166.
1
Tir-r s!Li".
r s
272.0
307.0
316.0
272.0
V l I ft L ' L i'
\P). CU. >•., mS(SLF)
182.6 ( 6448.J
205.7 ( 7265.
)
209.9 ( 7415.
)
182.3 ( 6440.)
1
K-
1 • > /kf.f-.Ot./iM'"
35.2/ 3/ 352.
17.9/ 3/
179.
27.6/ 3/ 276.
72.1/ 2/
72.
r
i
f-C
"> Jt A ;• H L 1
.'*1 TI 1 /- AViCi /I'?.*'.
44.3/ 3/lCfcd.
40.2/ 3/
960.
77.6/ 2/4408.
22.3/ 3/ 515.
I
(1.
vi it /!• >•;.(,! /fP.i
.1/ 3/ 2.
.1/ 3/
2.
.1/ 2/
4.
.3/ 3/
7.
»L/
-i ; i .- /<¦ a' o! /i c.i
20.8/ 3/ .34
32.8/ 3/
.55
67.2/ 3/ 1
.21
18.8/ 3/
.30
1 , ,
t! .
(• 1 11 V / v / r* ( T
2.4/ 3/ .04
2.5/ 3/
.04
2.7/ 3/
.04
2.7/ 3/
.04
u
, |.
vry m -'i
."11 y/*-A\Ui /»-1»i-t
15.5/ 2/ 16.
37.1/ 2/
37.
82.4/ 2/
82.
14.3/ 2/
14.
! w
i.r* ro't:---.
(ill ¦ /1 a.MjL /Ppr.
.5/ 2/ 1.
.5/ 2/
1.
.8/2/
1.
1.4/ 2/
1.
vO
,
I
I ll i-l I:'^ 4
/•I.' '!l
28.23
20.39
8.08
37.34
l( if A.: \
Fi'f
340.
166.
265.
59.
[
I( i;;.f i
I-.-.iii> t'pc
1041 .
931.
4228.
496.
C r> \
M/TIi-f PCi
.30
.51
1.17
.26
1
t-r.f C'iM.'
' T 1 i;f. pt>;
15.0
36.6
81.7
12.9
1
It -ASS C
~ A " "i
35.85
19.66
32.04
6.25
r "
i
( !. f t. , ¦-
221.29
223.07
1033.70
105.40
(P,' *
- /.ri
1002.6
1919.3
4502.8
872.0
\ v
t,
4.<<5
13. 59
30.94
4.25
i
T':! L f<: II.
•• I
. 4/;2 < 1.02)
.735
I
1.62)
1.964
(
4.33)
.333
( .73)
•-V • (i
!¦1
.62 < .8 3)
1.57
(
2.11)
5.28
(
7.09)
.63
( .85)
r
'
•wli. :•/>•
1 IC/M' t'v>
57.85 ( 43.14)
12.48
(
9.31)
6.06
(
4.52)
9.86
( 7.35)
[.
!:Str
I - Hi- )
357.15 ( 266.32)
141. 68
( 105.65)
195.60
< 145.86)
166.20
C 123.93)
»Sl>? (/¦*
H./l P l<- )
1618.21 (1206.70)
1218.99
I 909.00)
852.04
( 635.37)
1374.95
( 1025.30)
i
V ¦>! ; :> t. / •< '
»•- 11 /!'P !'•' 1
7.98 ( 5.95)
8.63
(
fc.44)
5.85
(
4.37)
6.71
( 5.00)
» • •> * L
1 I I /i'V n' )
.74J> C 1.225)
.467
(
.760)
.372
(
.611)
.526
( .864)
Tt'T.'L If '• I
>t L I i 4 I¦ t.:
PARI 1CULATE DATA. TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
Tn.'i :
'r t IH1
I-' )
ii. 1 1
( lu.fiti)
90NM
FILTER
r si r
1 0 / V
.'r ) 11.5
I B.fc2)
SA1PLF. FLOW
SCMSCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
F « { l
•./v.- I'
(1.1\ ?
¦ - ) I <'-.17
( 1 4'. .i)4 }
fULTIPLIFR FOP.
C/TEST
0.000
f 11
(/•.-. -
li !,•?
.1' i I 02 J.
< 763.)
MULTIPLIER FUF.
G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
0.0000 (0.0000)
1 s r: >
' ¦ / - . V ¦'
t'¦¦/!¦>¦
' ' J *• • « L
( 4.S4)
MULTIPLIER FOR
G/KC FUEL (C/L8 FUEL)
O.OCOO (O.COOO)
\'
. / 1
II -!> •¦
( » 7f K )
20 X 2J FILTERS'
S A-'PU F LO n
SCMSCF)
0.00 I
C.O)
-------
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
F'.flM m . ;;
TEST NU. Zi-4 RUN
rvc-i?.i. fi:u! i. n c/t j<.f.
DATf 3/17/ttO
IM'-IM (-.. I'l 0. CI Oil,, f
^4..0! / >'L I
2.6/ 3/ .04
2.9/ 3/ .04
3.0/ 3/
.05
3.2/ 3/
• C5
»;•> s^it- "1 It • / / r»\M
12.0/ 2/ 12.
33.7/ 2/ 34.
83.8/ 2/
84.
14.5/ 2/
15.
M*x • ck( i; m m/t ri.i /m'p
•
- ¦ -
.1/ 2/ 0.
.1/ 2/ 0.
.4/ 2/
0.
.2/ 2/
0.
mui irr; ( *ctr,--
36.74
21.20
8.05
35.18
>r r.ii'.f.' vt-l H'f. i'Pc'
69 .
125.
248.
65.
CI WCiMMUliN CP*
501.
790 .
4052.
512.
ov r<)? c.t \ /• 11 f;f' ft t
.2 7
.50
1.19
.27
f fj> Ci:M: M t'AT I lif. ?»»~•
11.S
33.6
83.4
14.3
l-f »».vi r.
7.2f>
14. 78
30.09
6.83
t:c '' i» r-i *s
10f;.3t>
189.10
990.51
108.75
cr? >' t. \ i; r. r- . s
894.<»
1869.3
4588.6
915.0
M.X MS.*
3.9tt
12.66
32.09
4.78
run »;n (i.i'j
.342 < .751
.698 (
1.54)
1.967
(
4.34)
.349
(
.77)
K<, J.J |i,p i-(
.63 ( .85)
1.59 (
2.13)
5.28
(
7.08)
.66
(
.89)
»• St C c,/~ • (oiW' fl »
11.44 ( 8.53)
9.3 0 (
6.94)
5.70
(
4.25)
10.29
(
7.68)
n; .•. k ic/t-r f.-.»
167.75 i 125.0/)
119.00 (
88.74)
187.69
( 139.96)
163.95
( 122.25)
'¦SCI ? '.,!<¦ IC./ii.' »•>)
1411.11 <1052.2b)
1176.33 t 877.19)
669.47
( 640.36)
1379.35
( 1028.58)
"*!u:x C/K- h.-- ('../fl' fu.)
6.27 t 4,6ft)
7.96 (
5.94)
6.06
(
4.53)
7.20
(
5.37)
f- s f r «. *-1 n .'/hp m* i
.5 39 ( .887)
.439 (
.722)
.373
(
.613)
.526
(
.865)
tutu if : •' »i.i ! ¦: i¦
.
P *kf iCOL AT E U
ATA, TOT AL"FOR
4 BAGS
U'T.M r 1 t r h' »
. 11,
(
90MM FILTER
i!S» f !¦/•• • '> • U /M: I.K)
f . i
( r>. 3 H )
sample Plow scrtscFi
0.000 ( 0.00)
I if ¦: (¦/-¦. I • ( (./>•;' Hk )
/(.'.r A
( 1/; ?.39)
nulT iPL IE fi FO'S G/TfcSl
C.OCO
!•'•»(*:/(.:= )
• . V ¦>
{ f. fit
fULTIPLILk FOk G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUEL)
0.0000 (O.CCOO)
• if ( i - /-: i II 71'. ;:J!
.'.II
20 X 2:)
IL TERS
SA-VU FLfiV: SCMSCFF " ~ 0.00 ( 0.0)
-------
TABU D-10A, TEST U-6 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU. li-Stm-OOl
ENGINE MU.Gmhh
EnGInF MCIDFl ?3 UK 3bb
ENGINF (,.u L(3bh CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 1
TEH 7*1.13 MM HG(?1.2t IN MU)
Wry HiiLH tr.fip. 25.b DEG C(7B.O DEB F)
TEST NO. U-fc
DATE b/ 1/71
TIME oiti2
OYNU NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE trt-2b?-F
HAG CAR! NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5? PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.1 Gm/KG( 83.2 GRAInS/LB)
NU X HUMIDITY C.F. 1.11*03
D
I
I—1
MM. H?0(IN, H2U)
f MM. H20UN. H2U)
TEmP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P
#LO«CH INLET
BLO"Ek Ifjl.fc T
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIKE SECONOS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SANpLfc M£ I ER/HAMGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE ME rER/RANGE/PPM
CO tiCtlGfiC ME IER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPIE meier/ranke/pct
Co? OCkCRD «iE1Eh/RAnGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE mEIER/RANGE/PPM
NO* hCKGRD MElER/RANGE/PPrt
OILUTIIHJ FACTUM
HC COnCENTRAIION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CUNCEKTKAJ ION PCT
NOX CU'^CENTRaI ION PPM
1
NYNF
blb.fl (27.*)
»S7.2 (18.0)
S*,* (130.fl)
7 1 bb
272.0
182.3 ( b*31)
5*.1/ 3/
2.5/ 3/
5*1
25
73.2/ 3/ 2153
1.1/ 3/
IS.3/ 3/
3.H/ 3/
b . b / 2/
.1/ 2/
23.2b
52S
20 bS
,e*
b.5
3*
.31
.05
7
0
2
LANF
711,a (28,o)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
80H7
307.(1
2(15. * ( 7253)
21.2/ 3/ 212
2.1/ 3/ 21
*8.5/ 3/ 1*28
1.2/ 3/ 37
31.8/ 3/ .53
3.3/ 3/ .05
23.*/ 2/ 23
,1/ 2/ "
li.aa
2b5
1353
.*8
23.3
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.U)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.U)
8311
31b.t)
201.b ( 7*0*)
2*.b/ 3/ e*b
2.0/ 3/ 20
83,1/ 2/ 5317
.7/ 2/ *2
bO,8/ 3/ 1,07
3.*/ 3/ ,US
30.5/ 2/ 30
.3/ 2/ 0
8,31
228
5150
1,02
30.2
*
NYNF
708,7 (27.1)
*b*,8 (18,3)
5*,* (I3n.d)
71b3
£72.0
182.0 ( b*3H)
1*.0/ 3/
2,0/ 3/
31.7/ 3/
.7/ 2/
11.3/ 3/
3,*/ 3/
7.5/ 2/
.3/ 2/
32.17
121
B7*
,2b
7.2
1H it
21)
13b
*2
.31
.05
8
0
HC MASS GRAMS
55.21
31.33
27.b2
12.b7
CO NASS GRAMS
*31,27
323.bb
1257,28
185,18
CO? MASS GRAMS
872.2
18U1.1
3132.*
Sbl.O
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.3b
*~.52
ie.bi
e.bi
FUEL KG (Lrt)
, 5H 8
(
1.21)
• 7b2
<
l.fcR)
1.810
I
*,17)
.378
t
,83)
Kw HR (HP HR)
.70
(
.S3)
1.5b
(
2,01)
5,11
(
b.BS)
.70
I
.1*)
RSHC G/KW MW (G/HP Hff)
71.38
(
51.20)
20.1*
(
15,02)
5,*1
t
*.113)
18. 02
(
I'.**)
PSCO G/KW MR (G/HP HR)
bSl.b*
(
*71.01)
208.01
(
155,17)
2*b.l?
I
183.57)
2b3.*5
(
Hb.*5)
BSCO? G/KK MR (G/HP HR)
125*.21
(
135.2b)
llbJ.13
(
8b7,3*)
7 bl.1*
I
57*.1*)
123b.25
(
121.87)
HSMOX G/Kk HR (G/Hp HK)
3.31
(
2.53)
b.12
(
*,57)
2.M7
I
1.8*)
3.72
(
2.77)
RSFC KG/K* Hh (Lb/HP H«)
.7KB
(
».ai5)
,*1U
(
.80S)
.370
I
.feUB)
.538
I
.885)
TOTAL TEST results * NAGS
TOTAL KH HR (HP HR)
0SHC G/KW H* (G/HP HR)
flSCO G/KW (G/HP HR)
HSCO? G/KM Hk (G/Hp H«)
bSrtOX G/K* Mrt (G/HP HR)
particulate daTa» total for * hags
B.Ub ( 10,Rl)
15.73 ( u.73)
273.S8 (20*.01)
128 ( biff)
3.3b ( 2.51)
1UMM FILTER
SAMPLE FLUW
MULTIPLIER FOR
multiplIek for
MULTIPLIER for
hSFC KG/KW rfK (LR/HP MR) .*** ( .730)
2l<
* 211 FILTERS
SAi-PL.L FLO"
SCH(SCF)
G/TE3T
G/K* HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0.1100 I 0.00)
O.OOO
II.OOUO (U.OOOO)
n.nnno (u.nuuo)
o.no ( o,n)
-------
TABLE D-10A (CONT'D). TEST 11-6 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, ll-5im-ntll
ENGINF NO.GM3bb
engine model 73 gm ahb
ENGINE b." L(3bh CI") V-R
CVS NO. 1
TEST NO. U-b
DATE b/ 1/71
TIME 01S53
DYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM-2b?-F
BAG CAN! NO. 2
BAROHE TEH 7"»1.13 MM HG(21.21 IN Hfi)
DRY BULB Tt""P. 25.b DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
BAG RFSWLTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
HLOWER OIF P MM. H?(1(IN. H?0)
BLOwtR INLET P MM. H20(IN, H20)
HLOWER I'lLET f F MP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
&LO*ER RE VOL'J' IONS
T If»E SEr.OKOS
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 55 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.b GM/KG( 81.2 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0218
a
i
to
DILUTION FACTOK
hc Concentration ppm
co concehtrai ion PPM
CO? COHCEMRAI ION PCT
NOX COUCf-M R A 1 I ON PPM
1
NYNF
blfe.O (27.*)
¦~57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (I3u,0)
7lb3
272,0
3*.37
3IJ7
.2*
8.2
2
lamf
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*,* (130.U)
8l)85
3U?.fl
TOTAL FLOW
STO. CU. MEIRES(SCF)
182.2
(
b*3b)
205.3
(
7252)
hc sample
metf.r/hange/ppm
32.b/
3/
3Pb
25.0/
3/
250
HC BC*GKl>
Mt ifr/kange/ppm
2,0/
3/
20
2.2/
3/
22
CO sample
IER/RANGE/PPM
2* , 7/
3/
732
*3.5/
3/
1281
CO HCKGRD
ME JFR/RANGE/PPM
.7/
3/
21
3/
28
CO? SAMPLE
MF.TER/RANGE/PCT
17.8/
3/
.S*
30,2/
3/
.50
CO? HOGRt/
ME IER/RANGE/PCT
3.1/
3/
,05
2,1/
3/
,0*
NOX SAMPLE
ML TTH/RANGE/PPM
8.5/
2/
22,8/
2/
23
NOX HCKGRO
MF FtH/HANGE/PPM
.3/
2/
0
.3/
2/
0
2U.bl
221
1220
. H h
28.5
3
LAF
7h2,0 (30.0)
5H1.0 (21,3)
5f.* (130.0)
8317
31b,0
201.b ( 7*U2)
28.H/ 3/ ii8*
1,1/ 3/ H
71,*/ 2/ 5157
,3/ 2/ 18
bl.5/ 3/ 1.U8
3,1/ 3/ .05
3S.2/ 2/ JS
,*/ 2/ 0
8.33
2b?
-------
TABLE D-10B. TEST 11-8 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
.PROJECT NU, 11-S|1**-001
fcNGINF NO.GM3bb
ENGINE MODEL 73 GM 3hb
ENGINE (..« L(3bfe C11)) V-fl
CVS Nil. 9
BAf»OMfTE« 735.33 HM HG(28.15 IN HG)
l)Rf BULB H"p. 25.b PEG Cl7R.ll DEG F)
TEST NO. 11-8 RUN
DATE b/ 7/79
TI HE lie:*?
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE tM-g(,7-F
BAG CAR I NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITr bO PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.8 Gfi/KG( 81.3 GRAXNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0721
BAG RESULTS
PAG NUMBER
description
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?(JlIMt H?0)
BLOWER IfiLET P MM. H2U(IH. H20)
BLOKES IULET IFmP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
HLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIHE SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW SH>. CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
blb.O (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (13n.0)
7151
272.0
180.* ( b37?)
2
Lanf
711.2 C28,n)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8080
307. ii
203.3 ( 7171)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30. U)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8312
31 b 4 0
207.5 ( 7328)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*b*.B (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
7158
272.0
180.2 ( b3bS)
0
1
Ji.
U)
MC SAMPLE MRlfcR/RANGF/PPM
HC HCKGRD nE 11"R/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE Ht1ER/R ANUE/PPH
CO bC*URD ME 1 ER/K ANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE HFrtR/RANGE/PCT
C02 HCKGRD Mfc TER/RANGE/PC T
NOX SAMPLE HtTEH/HANGE/PPM
NOX HCKGK'O mftfr/kange/ppm
DILUTION factum
HC CONCf.NTRA HON PPm
CO CONCENTSAlI ON PPM
CO? COnCtf.TRA 1 I ON PCT
NOX CONCENTRAI TON PPM
bS.*/ 3/
2.1/ 3/
b5*
21
*R.1/ 3/ lHHn
.3/ 3/
21.3/ 3/
3.*/ 3/
1.2/ 2/
.1/ 2/
2*.32
b3*
131*
.30
1.1
1
.35
.115
1
0
37,b/ 3/ 37b
3.0/ 3/ 30
»S,7/ 3/ l*b*
.1/ 3/
33.3/ 3/
3.2/ 3/
29.5/ 2/
.1/ 2/
18.22
3*8
1*17
.51
2*.*
3
.5b
,05
2*
0
32.2/ 3/ 322
2.7/ 3/ 27
82.1/ 2/ 5332
.7/2/ *2
bS.b/ 3/ 1,1b
3.0/ 3/ ,U5
*3.5/ 2/ *3
.1/ 2/ 0
7.85
<218
S073
1.12
*3.*
2*.3/ 3/
2.H/ 3/
30.8/ 3/
1.5/ 3/
IS,*/ 3/
2,*/ 3/
7.5/ 2/
,3/ 2/
31,*7
215
8*3
.27
7.2
2*3
29
111)
*fe
.31
.0*
8
(I
HC MASS GRAMS
b5«15
*0.75
35.71
22,3*
CO MASS GiJAHS
212.80
335.28
1225.5b
17b,18
CO? MASS GRAMS
175.b
lR'»b.*
*273.*
815,b
NOX MASS GRAMS
3.37
10.17
18.*7
2 . bb
FUEL KG (LB)
.511
(
l.ii)
.805
(
1.77)
1.110
I
1,31)
,312
(
.8b)
KW HR (HP HR)
• 7U
(
.ii)
1.51
(
2.13)
5.07
I
b , 80)
,b1
(
.12)
BSHC G/KU HR (G/HP HR)
13.83
(
bl.17)
25.71
(
11.17)
7.0*
I
5,25)
32,*7
(
2*.21)
BSCu G/K" hR (K/hP HR)
*lb.5S
(
310.b2)
211.*1
(
157.71)
2*1,73
(
180.2b)
257.25
(
111,83)
BSC02 G/K* HK (G/HP HR)
1387.10
(jns*.ib)
I1lb.20
(
B12.01)
8*2.87
1
b28.53)
1301.BS
(
970,79)
BSNUX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
*.71
(
3.57)
b.*2
(
*.71)
3.b*
I
2.72)
3,87
(
2.81)
BSFC KG/KK Ht< (LH/HP MR)
.738
(
1.213)
.5118
c
.83* )
.312
I
• bH 5 )
,570
(
.938)
TOUL test RESULTS * bags
TOTAL K» Mfi (HP MR)
BSMC G/KH HK (G/HP MR)
BSCO G/RW HR (G/HP HR)
6SC02 G/Kw HH (G/HP HK)
BSNUX G/KW Ht< (G/MP HR)
RSFC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR)
R . "5 ( 10.71)
?0.*8 ( 15,27)
252.37 (IBB.11)
111 ( 7*5)
*.31 ( 3,21)
.*bl ( .757)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
1UMM FILTtW
SAMPLE FLO*
MULTIPLIEH FOR
MULTIPLIED FUK
MULTIPLIED FOP
20 X ?ll FILTERS
SAKPLt H.ll"
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/Kw HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCH(SCF)
o.ono i n.oo)
(1.000
u.qooo (u.oono)
u.uooo (0.noon)
n.oo ( o.o)
-------
TABLE D-10B (CONT'D). TEST 11-8 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENG1NF NO.Rf.3bb
ENGINE miOF.L 73 GM 3hb
ENGINE b.it l.(3Sb LJO) V-B
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 735.33 MM HG(?fl.95 IN HG)
DrY BULB TKMp. 2S.b DEC C(7R.U DEG F)
HAG RESULTS
BAG NijnnCR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(TN. HaO)
6L0WFR INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BUomFr IhLFI TEmP. OEG. C(l)tG. F)
BLOWER RCVULUUUNS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. C». MET RES(3CF)
HC SAMPLE MFIER/RANGE/PPM
HC UCKGRO MEIFR/RAMKE/PPM
CO SAMPLE ItTfcK/RANGE/PPM
CO HCKGRD MF1F.R/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MElER/KAwGE/PCT
CO? BCKGHl) MfcTEH/RANGE/PCT
O NOX SAMPLE MFTfcR/RANGE/PPM
^ NO* HCKGKO ME IFR/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCrNfRAfION PPM
CO CONCENT RA I I ON PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCI
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (Lri)
KW HR IMP MR)
HSHC G/KH HI? (.G/HP HR)
tJSCO G/KH MR IG/HP HH)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX li/KK H|< (G/Hp HR)
B3FC KG/Kft HH (Lt'/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL K» HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/M" MR (G/HP HH)
BSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HH)
HSCUB G/KH HH (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/K* HK (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/rfw HR (LH/HP HR)
B.dl ( 10.7*)
js,(jo ( ii.ibj
223.89 (lbb.9$)
tfS8 ( b?0)
3.b* ( 2.71)
.*»B ( .h72)
HOT TRANSIENT PROJECT NO. U-5U**-001
TEST NO. 11-8 RUN
DATE b/ 7/79
TIME 09:22 GASOLINE tM-gb7-F
0YNO NO. 2 BAG CAR1 NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 58 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.* GM/KG( 8b.b GRAInS/LB) NOX HUMIDW C.F. 1.057b
12 3*
NYnF lanf LAF NYNF
hSb.O (27.*) 711.2 (28.0) 7fe2.0 (30. U) 708.7 (27.'')
*57.2 (18.0) *72,* (18.h) 5*1.0 (21.3) *b*,8 (18.3)
5* . H (1311.n) 5*.* (130.0) Sf.* (130,U) S*.H (130.0)
71 b 1 8oH2 8313 7159
272.0 30 0 3ib,0 272,0
IB".5 ( fe3?*) 203.3 ( 7181) 20?. 5 ( 7329) 180.2 ( b3bb>
37,*/ 3/ 37* 2^.0/ 3/ 290 21.9/ 3/ 299 23.11/ 3/ 23d
3.0/ 3/ 3n 3.0/ 3/ 30 3.0/ 3/ 30 2,9/ 3/ 2"*
2*.3/ 3/ 720 *2.1/ 3/ 12*0 7B,b/ 2/ 5105 30.8/ 3/ "Uu
.3/ 3/ 9 .7/ 3/ 21 0.0/ 2/ 0 .8/ 3/ ' 2*
IB.2/ 3/ .21 30,1/ 3/ ,50 59,8/ 3/ 1,05 19,2/ 3/ .31
3.0/ 3/ .05 2.9/ 3/ ,()* 3,8/ 3/ ,Ub 3,0/ 3/ .05
0,b/ 2/ 9 22.9/ 2/ 23 3*,0/ 2/ 3* 8.b/ 2/ 9
.3/ 2/ 0 .5/ 2/ 1 .7/ 2/ 1 .8/ 2/ 1
33.*8 20.b7 8,53 31,81
3*5 2bl 273 202
t>9» 1185 *90b 8b*
.25 .*b 1,00 .2b
8.3 22.* 33.* 7.8
35.9(1
30. bb
32,bl
20,99
1*5.8*
280.55
1185,33
181.37
RIB.5
lbHS.7
379b.7
87*.b
3.03
^.22
1*,01
2.8S
. 3hh
(
.81)
.7(15
(
l.Sh)
1.817
I
*,01)
.387
(
,85)
.b?
(
.Bll)
1.57
(
2.11)
S.08
(
b.Bl)
,b9
(
,92)
53.3*
(
39.77)
1^.5?
(
It,5b)
b.*2
I
*,79)
30,51
(
2S.7S)
21b.70
(
Ibl.SB)
178.bS
(
133,22)
233.*5
I
17*.(18)
2b3.b3
(
19b,SB)
1217.bO
(
907.97)
1082.37
c
807.12)
7*7,75
I
557,bO)
1271.29
(
B * 8 , 0 0 )
*.51
(
3.3b)
5.87
(
*.38)
2,7b
i
2,Ob)
*.15
(
3.09)
.5*5
(
,R95)
.**9
(
,739)
,358
i
.588)
,5h2
(
.92*)
PARTICULATE OATA» TOTAL FOR * BAGS
9I1MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLU" 3Cli(SCF) 0.000 (. 0,00)
MULTIPLIED FOR G/TtST 0,000
MULTIPLIER FUR G/K* HR (G/HP HR) H.UOOO (0,00(10)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) li.OOtlO (U.,0000)
20 X ?(• F1LIFR3
SAli'LF. FLO< SCM(SCF) O.OU ( tt.O)
-------
APPENDIX E
NO BASELINE ENGINE TUNE-UP RECORD SHEETS
x
Table
Engine
Number
Number
Description
E-l
14
1972 Ford 361
E-2
15
1973 Chevrolet 454
E-3
16 a
1972 Dodge 413
E-4
17
1973 GMC 427
E-5
18
1972 Chevrolet 350
E-6
19 a
1972 IHC 345
E-7
20
1972 Ford 300
E-8
21
1973 IHC 304
E-9
22
1973 GMC 366
E-10 llb 1973 GMC 366
aMore extensive tune-ups were conducted
starting with Engine 16. Modified tune-up
data sheets were used starting with
^Engine 19.
Engine 11 was retested as Engine 22.
-------
TABLE E-l. ENGINE 14 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y Manufacturer Displacement 36? / Engine No. /y
Carburetor Type
Manufacturer & Serial No.
Manufacturer Spec.
As Received
After Tune-up
.2 Sor
#°(/' 1 1>3 H F- IsiO - CA
Fuel Pressure
'/z.
Curb Idle Speed
(engine oil over 200 F)
7SZ> rpr*\
Fast Idle Speed
(if auto)
hone^
nono.
Choice Setting
(if a'-:to)
n on £
Dashpot Gap
Governor No.
Governor Speed
A. Mo Load
B. Fully Loaded
3800
oo
Distributor Type
'
•— _
Manufacturer & Serial No.
Z>577=
/tuTb/jJ-c, C-X7~F- /2./£J2 /?
— —
Vacuum Advance No.
Dwell
2^-3 o 7
d?£.r °
Timing
Q Ri'M
£ " ST2>C C, 6 2>as»fer
/0°
*
Primary
Resistor Valve
Total Advance
S RPM & In. Hg.
Mecn. Auv. 1.
RPM & Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7'.
(xdvo^cC starts c\.t SoO
Ma.*-!'0 a-t Zoo 0
3oO Si. »i-
O-OOO - 17-°
-------
TABLE E-l (Cont'd). ENGINE 14 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECX LIST
M/Y Manufacturer Displacement 3C /
Engine No.
Manufacturer Spec... As Received After Tune-Up
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. 6 Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
aJi/dnte.
/7)A%. ?'/s
Max. Engine Torque
@ Ri'M
3ys" xi <2#oo
Max. Engine IIP
0 R?M
&./o a~f~ ^ooo
/SZ At 36,66
Flywheel Bolt
Torque
>, n tfS /&S
//£>
/OS"
''(?
SO
/SLO
/ao
Zo/
/2D
Conracnts:
-------
TABLE E-2. ENGINE 15 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y /?f<^ Manufacturer _ Displacement ?/3 Engine No. /S~
Manufacturer Spec. As Received After Tune-Up
1
bore, Hof/ey
36?$395' ZXOZ t-'St
—
Fuel Pressure
3'6l -
y
Curb Idle Speed
(engine oil over 200 F)
—
•7&0.
Fast Idle Speed
(if auto)
—
—
Choke Setting
(if auto)
—
—
—
Dashpot Gap
—
-—
Governor No.
—
_
—-
Governor Speed
A. Mo Load
B. Fully Loaded
N.A.
N.A.
Distributor Type
£/ee~fror>, c tjn>hor> - rcfa^ior, cjCL
Manufacturer & Serial No.
;3&^&£39
—
Vacuum Advance No.
N.b.
AJ.Jb,
—
Dwell
32.
39 °
3o°
Tiro in;;
Q Rl'M
S* I)Annper
-------
TABLE E-2 (Cont'd). ENGINE 15 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
-M-/Y Manufacturer ^ Displacement Engine No. ^
Manufacturer Spec. As Received After Tune-Uo
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. & Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
f'/n " oj- vacuum -fo sfarf jo/unjer
rf'/n'' a "h /3'/a. /s /??^J> iGs-i A)- b
Spark Plug Gap
. 03^
;
, O 3 S~
Spark Plug Torque
(in lbs.)
30^-/Is.
3o H~- /Is
Max. Engine Torque
Q RI'M
—.
—
A/./?
Ha:-:. Engine HP
G R?M
•—
-—
J!.
Flywheel Bolt
Tc-rque
f /. lis
—
—
Cylinder 1.
Compression 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
/$0 /*> ' n t fr> U /»-> d CrriibrCSl rCn
pres£ore
/Maximum \[ana-fion be/coee*
1/i>Kc/ers, -^0
/-£- //" f-ror>j~
/or /jo
//O /or
/or /or
/oo /or
—
Comr.cncs:
-------
TABLE E-3. ENGINE 16 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M//y /J?3- Manufacturer /f?'01 £/ Displacement Engine No. /
t\nl)ur«.'tor Type
Manufacturer & Serial No.
Manufacturer Spec.
As Received
After Tune-up
/?Od//cS tfoJet 7o^3^lo7
£o£rs re td £ t~
Puoil Pressure
7'/x - £ /35'
¦ r ;
Curb Idle Speed
0
(engine oil over 200 F)
70O rpryi
?&<2./
-------
TABLE E-3 (Cont'd)- ENGINE 16 TUNE-OP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y Manufacturer d//£j/&Displacement ^
Engine No. /£>
Manufacturer Sp&c... As Received After Tune-Uo
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. & Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
6" - "5> "
/g" - /o°
6" - s
/sr f+-Jh
Max. Engine Torque
@ RI'M
SS'S* i$J <28DO
303
Max. Engine HP
G R?M
3ts* & 4O0O
£#3 (& J
-------
TABLE E-4. ENGINE 17 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y /113 Manufacturer &/WC_ Displacement Encrine No. /*?
C'ciihurutor Type
Manufacturer i» Serial No.
Manufacturer Spec.
As Received
After Tune-up
Fuel Pressure
7- 9 /is
7.r
Curb Idle Speed
(engine oil over 200 F)
J~3o
Fast Idle Speed
(if auto)
—
Choice Sotting
(xi uiilo)
—
-
!\v;hpot Gap
_ —
—-
¦—
Governor No.
—
£tpkt h
Coventor Speed
A. Mo Load
1'. Fully Loaded
<9Doo fl/Pm
/Jot fund/Oh! /vj
tfdOO rpm
0i^kvibutor Type
X)e. /c o n > y
Manufacturer & Serial No.
/jj) 36,r (a.ml)
limbs' {it)
V.&0 ro»< - /)d
-------
TABLE E-4 (Cont'd). ENGINE 17 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y Manufacturer &/71 (L
Displacement f
Engine No. //
Manufacturer Spec.. As Received After Tune-Up
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. & Beg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
/V. />.
A!. /?.
Spark Plu^s
Type & Manuf.
£44 r tic
/P4Hr fid-
Spark Plus Gap
Of $ 3 S*'
a, 03^
0.0 3C
Spark Plug Torque
(in lbs.)
/f //- /hj.
— —
/V. /Is.
Max. Engine Torque
Q Ri'M
3Go (ai <22dO
3AO @ &8GO
Ma:-:. Engine HP
Q R?M
<23 O @ 4#d0
Q, 4ooo
JZ43 @ 3200
Flyv:hciul Bolt
Torque
6>0 // /bs.
<£>0 //, /ks.
Cylinder 1.
Compression 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Xous?>ti s f~ />e.
$0 Vo af ^,qhes¦f-
reaJ-ny.
//o
/! O
/oo
/oO
no
/0O
/aO
A/. A
_Z2//& /}>r/Fue/
Comments:
6~D rf>m ^-€a^ 2)r2f> from
&0O r^sn
Co - %
Se.f U&/AA rpm /-&Ar>
J Dtcf-
Co - /,/ ^
-------
TABLE E-5. ENGINE 18 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M//Y ^73- Manufacturer £//£[//_ £7"~ Displacement 3t>~3 Engine No. //
wirburetor Typu
Miinufacturer & Serial No.
Manufacturer Spec.
As Received
After Tune-up
l-'ucl Pressure
y Vz> S ^z_
— —
Curb Idle Speed
0
(engine oil over 200 F)
&DO
— —
loo
r.ist Idle Speed
(i£ auto)
— —
— _
aJ,4
'i:o!co Setting
(•.!' as.: to)
. — —
— —
aJ./?
¦Jv.r.hpot Gap
_ —
- .
Al'fi.
Governor No.
A/./j.
—
/IJ-
Coventor Speed
A. Mo Load
15. Fully Loaded
a/.A,
AlJ.
Distributor Type
2>e.fetS $>srnl ~
— -
2)./u 1]
<29° - 3/°
32°
. i ri.i n;-,
t iil'M
Q Coo in. dr
— .—
P @
i:::ary
.• 'sistor Valve
/, 77 - J?, of
/J3
A>t;:l Advance
i RPM & In. Hg.
• 33' ® Vaoo *
—
3/ @ ¥30(2 •/ /^.J^
1. 'i-h. Adv. 1.
¦ '¦! i J)eg. Adv. 2.
3.
k.
5.
6.•
-*
O • @ #65^
2° ® /3af
//o (a)
//* (g) ?20O
0° (£) S6S"
@ /33S^
//e (Z Q ^0i^
-------
TABLE E-5 tCont'd). ENGINE 18 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y /%2. Manufacturer d//£//?OL E7~~ Displacement 3SZ> Engine No. //
Manufacturer Spec.. As Received After Tune-Up
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. 6 Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
o° @ /« M*
/s° £) /r.r" Aty
— —
& /S.S"
Spark Pluss
Type & Kanuf.
/?£-
Mr #cl
tfMr /f(L
Spark Plug.Gap
.03S^
03 c
¦0 3?-
Spark. Plug Torque
(in lbs.)
/jt /b s
/r /V. Ss
Max. Engine Torque
Q Rl'M
J?9o (3 <2^00
.
— .—
Ma:-:. Engine KP
G RPM
/rf & 4-oao
— —
Flyv:!;eel Bolt
Torque
6>0 /V- /J>s
— —
¦/¦¦/'. /J>S.
Cylinder 1.
Compression 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
/.pioest read//)tjs must J}^
Oi'thiK SO Vo 0/^ J7,
aJ.A
* 63G to £00 2>rop osed- Aor ZJ/e. Adjust,me- fesu/tant CO cuas O -£0 £.4 */<>
Comments:
-------
TABLE E-6. ENGINE 19. TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
ELA/GUVE JMPO/ZMfiT/OA/
EAJ<3/,s/£ n/>//vP/)L T£/VT i ^4-5j BLOC.K do/JF/boA AT/os/ rV~ 1 vZlOVt P.P/*y O t L. TyP£ 1 £E
P? A/SuP#C, To & £&. $P£CfP/ls/ITforf~—
a) Jr//T//)L 7V AW a/6 I~TPd@/\ 70O \Rprt
£>ti\ Mi) „ % C-yl ('mJ c ^
&) P7/iC* Tjn/sv'o, off S£t\
Hf\,
c] At/?*. COfL OUTPUT 2.QKV. MiM.
O) ff/JX. ovtPuT Vfi.e.tstT'/oA/'
C St/fiP fiCC£L ) SA/^fiy.
£) SPPSA plug nfitJi/Prtc. Tvj?£
3
r/P£ 1 JX I 6flp 1.33ol fQ \9-r-30
f) r/*z///6> Ove^/rve. I I M 7 6572- ' ]
-EN& !A/£~
/}) Oil. PjB£SS 1".P. \pcj®) \ 190O 1 J£P/^
B) Ttf£f:r?o ST#r Ik MP.
c)/?cto*L /KtjQX.-r-JTN.fr l/g/vl 'Z?o6\e/?/rj
D)0cT(/4L g/iT£l> hA N.p.
4000 \#Ps*
PP'SiSZ __
SPO. ' y
N.fi,
E) pz y WtfJ££L Bolt TORQUE 1^5"--5~5"
D£6>.QJ
J
Kv/.
Hv/.
n/?;/orA?£_ TO& £
TYP£ I
C./9P
psi
i-BFT.
LB £T.
TO
J &pm
TQ [
JZPPn
P.PPO.
epp?
HP
TC Pi ner,. @J I 700 /ZP/n
n.A. I
JJlI kv.
kit.
P?/?tf{/f/)C. TOPS. Ko*^.
77/5T 1 3-6 1 C,/9P>\.030\ ra\o-?-7c
33 IPs/ r^OO 1 je.p>/n
0-79 \,a jrr\ 7 100 1 RPfO
150-1 I 4rOOC?\ fi.Pyv
TQ
5-S~ 1
*/ £*.C.£PT //* fPtfC. /S /*«t£0/} f ZsSS
-------
F) OPJe£SS/OA/
*2
sp£c. UA2.
10
N ew
Low 2 0%
0-F RIvJ- I tr.
J
5-fft €r>\
~F\jL*\e. - Up
Sect iJ fv
TABLE E-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
E/VGJ/V£ /A/fOZMAT/O/f CONT.
/=>/96£ Z of +
P/jtST
P/fTH
Wbt
f
—
13-5"
i
2
—
Wsr
2
3
—
1 20
3
4-
—
itr
4
'£
—
\*>r
5
le
—
1^5"
L>
V
—
f \S~
7
s
--
10-0
8
H) PftOP
P££-. CVL/MDE.e
1) C/>e.3. B#L#/VC,£
*4
/) oca F/&///£>
I I p.p/*>
J %CO
a) £!/£// F/£./A4!>
ZLPS?
1 %CO
J) CHsck V'#e,.//oS£j P/TT/s/6 s oa/e/PAB, £ ff/fAS/ FolD \//><*. 5 1 ^ 1 oA
k) cy£c.k. #IL C»sAtrs /}"£> #£Pi-/?c-£ /A A/£Ss/}&y (rapPi?, /a/t/?*£, Psf*/, Cf?AB.8sis£. 1 ^ I oA
M «
^ LJ L/Jstt Zrtl 2.0 &P>/') £ Co C.Los£ -ro S£/a^£> 7'#£ S/?/*?£.
C0/^S^£A/7'S:
-------
TABLE E-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
D/5T£!BUT0e IMFO£n/)T/ON
P#o£ 3 of-5*
IVA £ ft. SPECIFIC# T/Q^S
fi) MAS/VFJCVOfiiA 1
N. V,
2) T/^f (eL£c..Po/VTj £TC.
£ Cfi?
Cj S£.£//tL A/t/rtG£&-
V): 75-.on
I n~
D) noD£L f/o/nB££. 1 4- 77 \ 4"^
c) V4C UOA0 ADV/?,vc£ S/0. #-
f) O »/*££- I 0£6£.££S
&) D'.M// is*e//itso//1 N,9t\@j 1 N. 0, | fcp/s)
//) /7e/rt/?£ / /S vox Z4/L l/£ I A/- P. I -Q
tdi
I
l) Po/'JT &£S/S7»*/C£ I \>oLT£, O /}D_
JJ rt£Ctt/>sJ/C/>/L p/srs/furo#
/}.?\//)a/c£
.
n
votrs d c.
/
8
3
5
Lo
7
6
DiST£/3f70X.
e.p/n
£}£C>.
I
Z
3
4
5
7
P/3T& /SoTofi.
¦ "ha \o*&.
EASCf/AfS
/ZP/'J
£>£&
£UOlAf£
DSC,.
flrrze -fuss^ up
1HC
,Q\ct
4-1314-.
30
£>£&.
N.P. lel/v.P,
TTIil
voLrs DC.
/
£
3
*
5"
to
7
8
D/uroe.
~1
JZ.
A.f
P£G.
0
O
I
&F/7
<0 0
0
XOO\
2~
\coo
\0-
A-OOV1
-) 0
£V,/
-------
TABLE E-6 (Cont'd). ENGINE 19 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
Cff£&UEETION INFOR.MRTIOM
Pfi£>£ 4 of 4-
Airtt/Uf/iC. TV£ £& S P£Cff'C. fa*/ 6
11
8) S££/fiL Mw n
/ * t «*-' •
z) CGjeB. TYP£ /- 2-f v^//r^-e/ J__2=_ _
fiuro '
ILtL
f) Zl/£3 /O /.£. *j q q
C~r//ro-rTL£p —-—
G) *.-.CA±-\ SZTlMAo.
C&.-.-.iC.'Z)
h') STSp Up SoUMt£>:
J ' P\W4.:*ZTt-L'
/v.A,
N.A.
tiPn
g.pn
l) JDL£} CO f*^37o]'% ffiyj ~70 0 ~~1 EPM
He QZH Of
' srUr ' ~FuLL
j) power val\/£ c.o\ n.p> 1% ran%
s£ rr/v6
ir/<.H£i
aJ ^._L4J?J
r- \psj
Z.) frTEUie Lf'i\ pouts/
i/o Z f
j ^OCO^fiP)
pr. P£K
Se«-
A?/ C>o\/££l A/oe TYP£
N o
A/olo*)D I N .A, CFtf,
A j <*Ct V/z 1
T
P) pf?sT /Z?Z£* ^-A' I /?/=>?
/9^ JS.£C-£fV£D
Holl-ey
JZ/tHZRS
Tmr~ss
n\
All
]
£/^£POiZ£D C
£Pn. S£T
C o/sa/£ CTS.D
D/SCOA'.VtL C Tit" o
fzm
Co
HC T
J%0/
] /*/>?
£>*>?
5 rz/A'r
FuLL
Co
<§/
%
f/flfftis Mg
£u*L ryps
J©
J (&OO0, &/>&)
u fv£ 1 1 pT. />£R
tfih
S£a.
/VOLo/ZO
PvlC i-OJiCi
P.P/*)
SPA')
prr£P. Tus/E UP
11
H>P.
4T+S7r~C1l
nii-%
PP^7
f2-pf^
p>\ 100
£A/££X> /£ £D 1 SSA.\£pr) s£ T1 MA. 1 eP/A
CotWtCfO
/y.A.
p/SCO-.»£C7£C I rJiA
fiPM
P.P/*l
rA 1.4-" \%<3j I -700 1
//c[ 0~Q0~1 PP^i
CO
5 r^y r
r/
to
*~CL
®/[rr i*t.//cs \^Q0 |RP^\
fuu ryt "'At
¦iK
S-,6
PSJ
i G-ooA I (ooo/p, 3 to)
VeL c,s^ £¦ I I Pr P£ A
see
n\A
f/O I o/>0
fULLvrtP
N.A.
M.A.
£S*M
M a k ut,*a-/
N > A. I epz-o
CoP)P1£s/T5',
l- I -All sit.
6 h*.
MOTOR T£\Jck£OlES£L
k£pA/*K A^AA/t/AL.
-------
TABLE E-7. ENGINE 20 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
SLA/GIVE /A/PO£AMT/OA/
P/P&e / 0f 4.
£s/&/a/£ r^/)//oP/lC To>K£
bOP: !7
SSW/JU A/a. \F(>U8^ 42336] Dy^/O lCgH 2 1 DrtTC R£C.£fV£0 1179
fSD. C.YL/*/D£RS H3
nOD£L- y£fig. I?72- D(SPi-Ae.En£rSf too BLOC-h Coa/F/c,vA/?t/oa/
SouRC£ Of £*/&///£ I TP.\JCK | ££p{P£ Df/). EZ] /Z/)T£D MP 1 /^i~ I 1 ?*<70| ,e/V7
f?/?Tj£Q s*7/)x. 7>. 1 2? 4 IQ' C^££H ye/>z>7 o/z. Ty/>£ 1 5"£ 1 0-O
/V rt/S U Tu 13 ££. $ P£C /P/C. /? r/OA/S
/9S £EC£/!//£O
flPTEfc -TvtVd UP
-SE COA/D/) tzy /6/l//r/C>A/—
*)/A/fT//}L T/M/si/£>\ \@/
; 9:>
/?Pn
D£C>.Qj
fZP/n
&)/V/9& TS'r7Ssv'6> o-ff s£T\_ZKKl
cj a^/)x. calL out Put 2.8 Kv. /^//v.
£>) r*/?x. ourPuT \z#&/sn~/&//
? C SP//9P fiCCfJL J
i—1
CTN
kv.
A V.
£) SPPZA PL u£> ryAK>ijp/>s- -rue* lAutoli'4e|
r/^! g F -4-CH ^ I -o?^l TQ I I
/v/fs/csF/ztL tc/&:£
TYf£ I
/&
/~J p/^/mc, o/£ /^/e. I ! 53> £ £ 4~
-EN6 JA/£~
/?) o/L P££SS fJEi^PS/ & rg-^';0 1/?/=>/¦?
PSlQ [
3) -r/j£f:sr>o st/? r I
c)j9c.TO'~/~ poax-j-A ~2941//?/>! ^ \f£P/>i
C-)/)cTW>L /Z/iTED /^TT<5l 1 16 00 I
1LB FT.
[
£.Prt.
£P/V
t/P£PA).
^9 Kv:
4- A ~.
/n
CHZL* ^1 */=wj
&PS7
13-Q HP 360 0
1 175"
TV? ^0
£tc.£pr /f fPtTC . /S A/a-r££>/9f less
-------
TABLE E-7 (Cont'd). ENGINE 20 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
£!VG//V£ /A/fOZMAT/OA' COA/X
P/)&£ 2 o-f 4-
f) domPjeess/oA/
*2 .
SP£C. I i.
± 1
L ^
of Hij A >
Ff/LST
P/fTH
/
& tr
10 )
z
i 0 0
19-0
3
°lS
1 IS'
4-
/po
no
'5
t oO
no
Lo
lOO
«3f
7
s
WST
hi) fZpM D£OP
P£ft. C VI /N DEE.
/
2
3
4
£
L>
7
8
xj (LPZ-B- 8/?L/)/VC-£
*4
/J odd f/je/uo.
~/J LV£
S+£¦!..
HEAP
,100 to i BoLXi, U0-70l
7"C
.i^o
*2 A/O SP£C,. 80% of MM.
%C0
a) £V£// F/Z/M&
I I -e/v?
J %CO
J) Ch'sck v/fC..Uos£ j P/rrsA//4 g Co CLoS£ to &£///£> t/^£ S/?/v£.
C-o^meMTs:
£ r\ j I C 35-^ec v s> y\ •& )'y c:t e/- $ /" "3 /tL. 0 s"t.&tr.
-------
TABLE E-7 (Cont'd). ENGINE 20 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
O/ST£l3UT0£ !NFO£n/?TfOM
P#c,£ 3
MfitJUF/tC.TUAEfi. SPtcmcd TIO^Cj
fi) MA/St/ftfC TUtfc*
¦TO!-: r j F'
2) r/^(£Lec.,Po/V7> £TC,
K- rrf ;
on
.0 9-7
yv, p
CJ <£/Z/£L sJva?B£&-
D) /70D£L 1 P^-TP )9l9-7gft'
fj V^CuO/i AD W)/SC£- /SO.
N.P.
p) o yS££C \3^l\0£C&££*>
g) M&47/0//1 N.0,1@/ N, ft- PPP)
w
i
H
00
t/) y P£S/57~o& i/jV/i/j? ll
l) Po.-AfT ££S'st/?ss c£ \0*r5 \ VOLTS, & C /^X,
. (oe) GooD o £&/)£>_
_£s?C///if
do/S v£
/
'700
2
AQOO
3
1 900
^f.
$00 o
.310.
Ld
2-50
7
a
.pre.
Q-h
%rii
i-h
2hl*<
>-±i!
>
O/iG.
10
6-9
If
10-13
"
0-0
0
;h?
0
.
:
PS £PC£/V£D
/ / -)f
P3Tf lfrjO-7 G-P
h>p.
DSC,.
II
s/otrs D C.
Di st£*/1V70£.
&/>/*)
/
$0 0
}
2
)ooo
"7
3
)S00
4
0-000
5
Qso
£rt n
Lo
7
fi
P/sr^/Sc/ro/z
"Hr
Diz c*.
/
2
/0
7
3
ir
/?-
4
>0
/?¦
5
V
/?
La
7
8
ga/gimE
&£&
£a'o /A/£
DE 6.
flFTEB -TUfSS UP
MOTCRAFT
.0^7
/-/.!>/
gg« ccrF-io-rrz-Ai-on lA',
J\l .*0, ^ Sa^if 3--f-
rece'iyzJ J is*ir i e> "~*t oy (j't
27_
PP6.
'•or^-e. otr^ ~tk-*_ i-ehtA-lli
N.D, & I /V./3
ZPl
).4n-P-
\...0,.^K I Vo/r5
D/lT£!ttu7o £
SP/^i
D£C,
/
Pno
Vo.
2
1 00 0
5
C?,
i ^oo
_ 4^-.
Ct-ooo
%
lso
2. '
•2.SO
& 0
7
8
...
p/5 TiZJSu roe.
J
."H9
:r
DtO-
~2"
2
10
3
If
10
<-
o-n
10
5"
o
o
7
s
/a/£
&pa;
o£>r,.
1SH
d£c,
-------
TABLE E-7 (Cont'd). ENGINE 20 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
C/?£8UEETiON )MFO£MATIOM 4of*
MntsuPne. TU/Z ££. S P£ct£!C. /)
ft) E/Z
s) S££.//iL fSonB£fZ
C) WODE.L A/ /.'to,asp A. 5£"r
Ht\,
//) STIP "p SoL£M/0' ¦
- ZfJZ' r' rf\ /
i) jdle} co [Z5Z3% ^(ZZ5aZZI 'em
_//c
j) Powafi vaLvs c.o\rJ»Sr4%
PuLU
Stl
%
SETT///&
ir*<^H£S
I am* 1
Pu£.L TyP£ [ N. ~1 @> I Ws-* i 1 PS!
J A'si/Jt £ '£fir Lt.'i", -o VctZs/O /£ S£7T/s/C, F^u io/)0 r/,A~l *P/^
6) C f/o A £ S£ TT//s6> MAnUA L.
p) FfisT /£>/r\ 14-on I je/=/y)
Q) 0f\S^?0T 5ZTT/r cr \7/^io i/9
Connd/STSZ
PS ££C.£f V£D
C-fr P
T
to-,. !rT')' zF>'
/.r~.
YF CO-OS'S
dL
RI ic
All —
3 j?PM
1
£//£P OIS£D
ePf*>. S£T\
pm
c oa/a/£ C 76 D
0/SC6A'Al£C. T£0
RP/*
— j y^yCAO
CO
HC
^~1Z @j
ppm
— — />/»
<.Trt/Zr
rUt-L
Co
(31/
%
zn
//rc//f-S //£ |
/I,^ 7T/^
PS/
({* <2 ci pj
•So/, u A//T
fr. £>£R
Sea-
f/OLof}t>
fvLC Lo/iO
P.P/*)
J2PM
/SPM
f)fT£P- -TOME UP
CLARTtik \ {o, MOTORCRA1FT
OCLHF hA Znemz-'tM-**
srlve>- T
95-10
]
fi\
n\
cop
gP*o
P.pf1
£A/££.C,/££D UMHtP" S£T[Ea) eps*
C OAt/vi c T*0
N. A,. fiPM
p/sco<.v£creo [ /\J, A j P-PW
n A 1 %®J 1 600
e.m
_^cj UtoJl ^s. U
" sZ'll
i -*')/¦' r
c.ol »4-|/o
.1^
®j\ 3 I * Hi I O-
Fvet 7/^
HA. 1 % \ Sh. I ps/
(rD pX I ((jOOP, 0f/O)
i/elor*£ | | Pr P£ A |
see
N.A,
f/o Lci"P
fTuLU Cu*0
HA.
TV, A
£PAO
Aaawl/A L
A'.A.
£P/i
Hi.
* Woo
Alo> $
It IV n't HC ¦ w's J "Til
/"JV
f)C f^ C. y p I J. I,/ 51 -r Co VJ «r- »' « •? ' •• • • J Jo -» ¦ 0
i ^-c.b
-------
TABLE E-8. ENGINE 21 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
E//GI/VE T/Ofl/
P/tce / of 4-
EM6/A/E W)a/u£/ICTuK£
noocL. yene.
t.Hc
SER/AL f/O. I / *• " -
Dy/Vo
p/?te received hr.b',.'~)
D/SPI.AC.E n£/ST
. L2d-2J®/ £.ps*j otL Typ£ 1
I K €
a/
P?E>/SvFS>C* To REP. }P£C.tP/CAT/OA/S
ftS ££.C£ fV E D
-SCCOMDAfLV /6A// T/OA/—
a) jv,t//)L T/m/a/C> Tpcl Q/! "70O \RPn
0 !-N C-/1' HZ
ft) A7S> C, ~T s /*) //x/ Cy off SET r-^A -
cj/^n/jy.Co/L OUTPUT 2.QKV.M1M.
O) r^f/7X. ou~tP
B) T/V/:/:/~>o sr/> 7~ TZrt-0.
H. V.
Vs.-
c)/pc.toeL m/ox.-rrt 2-a.0\i a rA ^4-0O\R.P/>>
D)vcT(/#l /ZfiTED HPS 1^7
?*K>0\*P»
f/P*SiSL __
j?f- = TQ UU.
£) pzy W/J££L Bolt Ta£QU£ 1
D££>,QJ
kv.
/v/?//vr/9c. tc/iG£
TY/°£ I
*1 £ *C.£PT /£ SP£<1. /S *'<•>.'££> J7 f If SS
3 r- aa/it/op reuru' A/jd DlK(TL RErPAJf?
PETER. -forVd up
T£cJ d£o . &> 17oo \ p.p/n.
32- Rv.
A ~.
/V/ftvc/£/)C-ro>j?£L |cHAjv\ ?\QN
r/P£ 1 jr-4 i 6/?Mo3 0[ ro\ 20
4~0 Ipsj 1 I 0 i js.£=/n
Fr.
0-*t00
I 0-4-
i ? Wl
I < 7
tq yo
-------
TABLE E-8 (Cont'd). ENGINE 21 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
p) C-OmPJeESSJOA/
*2
SP£C.
UK
I no
H.
oo
/
z
3
4-
•51 10 0
Liil
OO
z.!_joO_
-r 10 0
100
£IVGJN£ /A/FOe.MAT/OJV CONT.
r/)c.£ a
p/zst F/f TH Wsr
12JL
125
\?0
IV
135-
170
130
no
h) K.PM D£OP
P££.. C YL //VD£€.
/
2
3
4-
£
L>
7
8
J) CJtzck V/iC, ¦ //oS£ / P/TTja/^S oa/04A3, £ ***>/ foLD u/>&. Li*/£ 5
o/f
A) C.H£cA 4lL 6*iAirs f?EPL/)CP /P A/£SS##y (TtfWeT, MT/)*£, Pf 4
&ofrs 1fO-IQQl
l) LosM V/?l*£S $ tq. /?'<£/?£> &oCrs /r //£S£/)/{/. ////i I 1/1
/4^-vr
X) C/P&B- 'C-£
*4
/) ODD P/jeJ/S&
£.P/*y
a) £\/£A/ P/£./sS6
S.PP?
oA
=» 2 tPA/O 5P£C.. 80% of P1AX.
* i MAX. V*K//}7/0'<' of /o -ro 2.o &P/4 g CO C.Los£ to 3f/sf ~r/^£ SrtsiJE.
C Of>/'Q£//7'Sl
-------
TABLE E-8 (Cont'd). ENGINE 21 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
D/5TSIBUT0E. INFO£M/?T/OM
P/)c>£ 3 of4
M TuRER SPECIFIC.# TIO'JS
/>) riAs/i/FJC7t>Jt*A
;y, ^
f; £Lac., Po/sSTj £TC. f »
C! a't/rt/3£e.
f)j F70D£L //(,/*)&££¦ 'O'j*?- Cl!
f ) >//?C uu/-7 /!D v/}/sc£- 'SO.
r) DW£ll- \r?-V>-\ 0£C£.££S LUU3 ] E.y'f./.Vi ^
/2&
NO J) A*UC///>a//C/}£
M '
s)<.*Z//fVC£
C.u/Sv£
Jj*l
/
1 0 0
2
19?
3
WOO
/z
0 "¦ 0 1
5
Lo
7
&
1
Uljr!
15-17 ¦'!
Ill
A J vfcuu/^)
/;&
' N. U, 1
/
z
3
5
Lp
7
8
F/*7C/_3uT3£L I Fr, 0//y£__
r""*
5
__LL
0 i
:W^-I
i
St„v,
i
i
a
!"
l!
1
I
1,
ns &£C£/ V£D
DSO.
JS.PM
il
voLrs D c.
/
2
3
4
5
U>
7
8
Ot st£/&vTo^
FLP/n
D££>.
P/S TJS /SuroM
/
2
3
4
5
Lo
7
8
D&6"
£A/e>/s/£
C>£&
£/ZO !A/£
D£6>.
1WC TRuck s£Ri/\c£ s*A/rj/\l - ClC-QW-k
/)FT£g ro/s£ UP
/M.P,
pg / /v r
|^-2fOS-0
0
£
400
'A
3
MOO
II
00 00
15"
5
L,
7
8
D/STiZ/Suroe.
«He
e>/"6.
/
I
0
2
5"
su,t
3
7
Vo.
*
)/
4-
5
u
7
8
F.'/O i/V £
0£
-------
TABLE E-8 (Cont'd). ENGINE 21 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CREBUEETION IMFOZMflTION
Pfl£>E 4 of 4-
r-i/)uor/)(L Ti/fi£P. s
'0 nf\MUf#CTUX£/Z : rl rJ L l~ j- "
£) lEft/fiL //onB£/i 1
J) VODSL aV/-> 3£f- i Or 2 7 7 0$ ~ CJ
f Lfsr f/vmeez.
/95 &£C,£tv£D
HoLLgV
4-T;m~c9
Oi'3. TYP£_I- z-¥ WTV/Z.C* *2-
A; ' 7 £>77' "lle/'A?
ai] £Pn
, r//s or r L.-} r- - -,- i , _ n....
£/S£JL*0/££D
~\epj*>
(LoAssSCCriO
RPa^
t,,A . \*.P"i
w
I
to
U)
/ ¦ IDLE) Co ( 2.o r% I 70 1 1 '£/=>A)
/-/C [77^71 p* ^
' ir*JT f-'.rL
j) ro'sjze. vaLvs coLmZUHl%
^f.rr/A/G (*rmI MP
/^i/
ij -T/p£ C t\'l-Lii^i
L- / *£*r u¦¦) ^ , ¦ r'-K~~\ L,>co.iwl)
-r; :¦ /; j/"- ! /,: /.^ |
7 / /: X " ""1
• • T/P.C
. 1
AfoLoJt £>
r
HA.
,.,c,ov£^/o< S£rr/^fuUieii0{ Ni^
C) Cr'/oA£ 5£TT//,6, L
m;
MS
s>jsc.oA-.\/^a reo
c° % ~\% r ~7oo i ftp/*j
hc. 1 Q-Oop-fl ppm** Pho b'ie-sy- 9
CO
@/
%
/- ul. L
/ACtf-c.
fu*L rypjr
> L
J©
PS/
c o O, £'//&)
Vet. u Ai£
fy'Oi-o/>0 |
PvLt. LoriO\
£>t. P£K
\£P">
Sea.
nrrf.fi yu^£ up
HflLLEY
4-^790 f-C.9
6314--\
_2-_J
7i?p ___
£A/£AlC/d £.0 1 ^-A,l/?/>/-) 5£/l /V./*U
C o«ss, c 'to [ //./}, ] /^Al
£>/;<:<-¦• Ai//i i [ — —J
fvft 7y£ 1 ~ " 1 '¦$' ^ ('¦ O 1 Pi/
\ {C.OOP, Q/iO)
1/eL (//*> £ |^_ J pr Pt X ^ —
S £ C
iy^AZ
//&
N. A,
N,t\.
N.A.
N.
£PA?
p) /TS/S 7 A'S-'/O
c_ort/n£/sT5%
*$¦?<:<><} o," (7/-> J. n ur~r<*y. — ¦
Ex: L 2 in (i "fw_el I € ^ S » Bo\aJI ?K 0 'h > >*¦ J W etr& j? "2 J ,
XJ l-e. W35 vet-y IH C Qp*l-s{ oy's
u- h f
¦ ^ r- ^ ;47^4»
-------
TABLE E-9. ENGINE 22 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
E-A/GJNE /A/AO/9 T/OA/
P/?&e / of 4-
£AJO/a/£ TisA £
'/•/ (1
-Si£MPL /SO- ITQ.y ! ?TQh I OY/VO
d/)t£ Rec.£iv£o
N, P.
noDZL. y£flg.
D/S PLP)C.£ P?£ A/7
"> i. '
J> 6 o
8 Loc.k C.os/F/c*uA/)T/ots
\L
A/O. CVL/UDEP.
E
Sou£.C.£ of £MO>/tfi?
&/?T£D P7/9X. 7>-
Tf J
TO©' EH2
ZXHfiusT PJP£ OtP.
/?.&/>? oil ?yp£[
£/}T£D H.P. ''>0 <&> \±0>Q\ J&pw
fl//T/OA/—
a) wr//)L T/S*/J\/&\ \(&[ ? \RPn
D£&.@J
FlPsn
;•/ A.
B)/¦?/)£> -TJ/v/fJC, Off SET
cj zv7/9/- Co/L o o,e /^r/e. 1 1 ? 1 ' ¦> r: 79-
-£7/6 JA/£-
/?) o/L Pp£SS 1 N,9\p<;j@) 1 N.P, IJ£P/^
8) THe Km o ST 4 r 73" A?
E
/ZPP)
c) jOc.rur;L 3) 0\i srA °AZPFi
^ r^—
D)/?cT(/4L /Zsrrip hp\ '> 0 \. 0351 7^) I I
^£_]/»5/ 1 O-OOO je.p>/n
2- tS j a rr 9-20 0 Rprn
234- 1 HP [W]^
"3 07
tq
] FT
*1 £^/) f l*s$ . . ^ / y<
-------
f) c.omP&£ss/oa/
*\P.A -- 1
F/AST
F/FTH
/
no
)70
+ I--I z
?5
\1()
ihr L?•¦• 7^ 3
-i-f ... ,'j'..J-
¦5
?o
l!>
10 5
iOO
19 0
le
(Of)
7
?JT
iir
s
ion
10-0
*ErFGi/v£ T/vnmmdWEvm
/=>/?£,£ 2. o-f 4-
Wet
fj) D£OP
P££-. C Y/L //VO£e.
f
2
3
4.
£
to
7
a
X) C.ffje.3. 84Lfis/C-£
*4
/) odd F/sevso
1 I e &r-) (H
2) £V£// f/£./y£
e.pr? L
w
f
N)
cn
j) CMSdk Vfid ¦ Mo S£ t F/TT//S6S oa/ 0/PA8, v/tC.. L>t*£S 1 1 oK
a) C.H£C-K f)lL GSSAtrS Xafi-tfCrZ //r A/£SS##y (TrtrfeT, Cs?/>. 3.8/1 f£.
L) L/?sM /}fiy. A(/fi I ^
o/c
valvs
"T~ H£f)& > a r
X Ti<.m &oLts £V-°> P-T/.&.
TG
%CO
%Co
#z /r yyo sp£C.. eo% of max.
*? MAX . VA/>;>9TS&SS o-f /o -To 2O &PS4 g Co C.Los£ to 3£¦//?£> ~r/^£ S/)/v£.
C. /UzA/VSl
-------
TABLE E-9 (Cont'd) . ENGINE 22 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
O/5T£iBUT0E fNFO£M/?T/ON
PS)C>£ 3 of V#/sc£ A/£>.
N, A,
f) D -YA £>^6£.£££> rSK] G-hP
C) £>IJS// MZmt/o// I HP. I# 1 I
W)&€//')/?£/ &ES/STOJZ Mll/£
l) Po/A/T sse£ 1^> °->5\\'n/T< jo c
(ojC) Q oop o ^3_/?0_
j) KLCtt/ffJ/C/iL
Jh.\/S]A/C£
(Lu£ ¦*£ /
2
/i
S
to
7
fo
0
rm.
ID.7
jL%5.
Jtlll
'rrrll
D^J
^75-15
£,YC//fif \
M
H) vficuuw
/)£ \'/i/VC£
Ctsg\/£
%
N h I &PM
/
z
3
4
5
le
7
6
LL£L
Q/sTCJ!it/7o 8 I EtV6/A/£
iJteiu
J?£lu
f)S ££C<£/ V£D
D£Z>.
]@>E
g-PM
Zl-fi-
volrs d c.
Di st£/307c&
t
Z
3
4
5
Lo
7
8
/
2
3
4-
5
L&
7
8
P/st£ /Scroti
\Db&.
£jyc> !A/£
/ZPs'J
/?£&
£//6> /A/£
ftp/*)
D£C>-
S)FT££ -ft"S£ UP
P^J
C.O
e ^v%s/
T
A
m i us
A.
lo I £>/=/¦,. "LI QfrP
N • P. 1 © I 1 !r D I /V)
UM sl
0.5- J
VQlrrS DC-
O/js T£ /GoTo/z
0£tS.
/
loo
0
z
4 00
I
3
10-0 0
1.5
4
0
13
S
U>
7
a
/
2
3
4-
5
L,
7
8
jD/5 TJSJSU 7~o€.
PPM
Pif6.
E.V/> ia/£
&FS7
Oft..
_£A'
-------
TABLE E-9 (Cont'd). ENGINE '22 TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
Cfl£BUE£T/ON INFORMATION
pfioe. 4 of +
M/ifi/uFAc. Tuz bp s pbcip/c. a r/osss
a) r>fifsaffic.Tvx££. 1
8) S££//;l //i>nQ£P
C) MODEL P: . |—,, >¦
' C 'Cc^ '.A tVefS I c} ^ ') JZ.PA)
I) JDL£} Co
%&\ze:
£PM
Hz I zr~\ f^'SOV-rM Pt-tf
' sr.-/at FuLL ~ ' '
' ~ rut- i-
j) PO. ft
i*te.H£S
f i/V
.?.£ __
x) P r>-?
PJ/
i.) /I''/;.
£COi£ Z£A7 LC'l.WofJf/
i/oLv/s> s\ r I. fl Pr- f£* ' f-i.f
f '-- i (c,ocOjBfiD)
S£C-
M
'h C,os/££* s/o<5 Ty/'g
t MoLor,D 00 \ em
Aj C,oi/£ sZssc. JZ S£f7M& r^u L e/) g j £yQ ') Q j #P*1
0) C Mo A £ S£ rr/,, 6 [~
N'Z,
p) PS?ST J£>/ ' - '> J 0 °\ £J=>M
PS P£C£(V£D
H OLl. [P
/If T£P- TortE UP
H oL-LP v'
A fS^ri
uwy *
8
fA
J PPM
pPM
£WPPCIZED
! CPr>. S£T
pm
C oA/a/£C 71D
J?/SC0A.-.\f£C.7£D L
PPM
] PPM
Co
HC
~~| PPM
PPM
Co
0/
* r/Wr /?ui- L
rz5%
/ArctfcS //g
Fujll rype
J®
psj
I (t-oo/7, 3/!&J
Vol. u f}£ | ] pT. p£R
Sea.
A/oLor>0
LojfO
j>e/>7
1 PPM
PPM
6 rf^T'
4 0^?^ +
d-
/? 1 - pp^i
m i s^O ! pp^
£A/£filC>/££D
C OAS/Se C I
p/sc¦v>£creo (
£Pf)
S£T\ —
eps*>
MP\ * P-PM
MA- 1
r.A hC \% 'dj I 5"-TQ | e.PAi
pel Hp. I Fjp/^
Co
Q>
S-T'7r-r
cf
J to
,IL
l/ft-Wc s H <* j
/W T/P£
rf,A < "i Q r 1 p<,,
y \ (ooo/?, 3*0)
VcLonZ I — I fir P£* | \S£C.
/So L o*P
f»tt. t,w>£>
4~0 % 0~~] &/>/*>
Nr,-t UsrT
MA.
PPM
comments z
A cf o's- . j ¦ t - q 1- o
UkI"t "s-CC 0 f' cO. b CV :'¦ r (1 0 ;, ¦ 2/i,^
//' 7' T/? I)CX P-, Np ' p/^r
^' r' o
REPA R- WftrWAL- )S
.: v / /^v~, 0^>>^ — (z"P^\
d /f/'P A'.eo/
-------
TABLE E-10. ENGINE 11 TDNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y / Manufacturer 6- /?) d, Displacement Engine No. //
Carburetor Typo
Manufacturer & Serial No.
Manufacturer Spec.
As Received
After Tune-up
-/¦
-------
TABLE E-10 (Cont 'd),.. ENGINE U TUNE-UP SPECIFICATIONS
CHECK LIST
M/Y /tf73 Manufacturer £/7j(Lj Displacement 3£>fa Engine No. //
Manufacturer Spe.c«.. As Received After Tunc-Uo
Vac. Adv. Curve 1.
In. Kg. & Deg. Adv. 2.
3.
4.
/Vone,
Spark Plugs
Type & Kanuf,
£44 r #
/SO
/Af
/*?5"
/30
/30
/4cZ
Consents: 4 // hC'Lesi.fi J as £/-n<7/U-£
-------
APPENDIX F
TEST RESULTS ON NEW ENGINES
Engines 1, 6a, 7, 8a and 10
Table Number Description
F-l thru F-5 Summary of Results
F-6 thru F-10 Transient Test Computer Printouts
F-ll thru F-15 Nine-Mode Computer Printouts
a
Engines 6 and 8 are repeat tests of Engine 1
-------
TABLE F-l. ENGINE 1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHC 404
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 1-8
TEST
1-9
HC,
CO,
CO2 $
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Cold
8.02
127.12
1152.
7. 33
0.434
8.28
27.21
Hot
3.32
88.96
1147.
7.60
0.409
8.60
26.53
Composite
3.99
94.41
1148.
7.60
0.413
8.63
26.62
Cold
7.98
130.00
1176.
7.13
0.443
8.74
26.96
Hot
3.25
91.37
1144.
7.68
0.409
8.55
26.38
Composite
3.93
96.89
1149.
7.60
0.414
8.58
26.47
Average
3.96
95.65
1149.
7.60
0.414
8.61
26.56
NINE
MODE
Test 1-11
Test 1-13
HC,
g/kW-hr
1.863
1.798
CO,
g/kW-hr
46.605
43.678
C02,
g/kW-hr
~~ —
NOX,
g/kW-hr
6.972
7.130
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0.460
0.459
Average
1.831
45.142
7.051
0.460
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1978 IHC 404 CID V-8 S/N 404-053483
Rated Power: 189 Hp @ 3600 rpm
Rated Torque: 323 ft-lbs @ 2200 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 545 rpm
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kg Fuel
g/km^
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 3.96 (2.95)
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)95.65 (71.33)
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 7.60 (5.67)
HC
CO
NOX
9.57
39.60
18.36
3.28
79.11
6.29
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.414(0.681)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.61 (11.55)
FUEL CONS.
342.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE
F-l (Cont*
d) . ENGINE
1 SUMMARY OF
RESULTS
1978 IHC
404
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS b
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
Test 1~8
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
37.49
21.19
8.58
3.48
7.75
8.40
8.06
4.34
CO, gram
362.42
301.38
348.54
108.81
109.75
193.80
354.41
106.63
CO2/ gram
1215.3
2221.0
5656.7
1067.9
1068.1
2091.7
5608.8
1093.3
NOX, gram
3.98
9.37
46.82
4.45
4.68
10.06
46.18
4.77
FUEL, kg
0.600
0.871
1.964
0.394
0.399
0.764
1.952
0.403
KW-HR
0.91
1.77
5.35
0.79
0.79
1.71
5.30
0.79
TEST 1-9
HC, gram
36.29
20.70
8.82
3.94
6.87
8.59
8.13
4.18
CO, gram
349.06
288.47
385.06
113.23
114.87
194.82
354.94
116.94
CO2 gram
1183.0
2382.6
5627.8
1077.8
1059.7
2097.2
5534.5
1096.0
NOX, gram
3.72
9.88
44.41
4.32
4.61
10.11
46.63
4.33
FUEL, kg
0.582
0.915
1.974
0.400
0.398
0.766
1.929
0.408
KW-HR
0.90
1.75
5.30
0.78
0. 77
1.70
5. 30
0.78
POWER
MAPPING (TQ in
ft-lb)
@ Temp. -
1
CO
0
Baro. -
29.10
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
273
2100
291
3100
262
4100
-
1200
275
2200
291
3200
255
4200
-
1300
277
2 300
291
3300
249
4300
400
212
1400
279
2400
291
3400
243
4400
500
254
1500
282
2500
289
3500
237
4500
600
260
1600
285
2600
287
3600
231
4600
700
258
1700
288
2700
285
3700
-
4700
800
258
1800
289
2800
282
3800
4800
900
263
1900
291
2900
277
3900
4900
1000
268
2000
291
3000
269
4000
5000
b
Barometric Pressure:
Test
1-8 = 735 mm Hg
Test
1-9 = 734
xran Hg.
-------
TABLE F-2. ENGINE 6 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHC 404
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 6-3
TEST
6-4
HC,
CO,
CO2 >
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
KW-HR DEV.]
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Cold
8.21
128.93
1070.
7.33
0.409
9.11
28.19
5.9
Hot
5.02
96.44
1060.
8.22
0.387
8.96
27.64
4.2
Composite
5.48
101.08
1061.
8.09
0.390
8.98
27.71
Cold
10.12
146.40
1118.
7.24
0.435
8.81
27.18
2.3
Hot
5.84
97.81
1097.
9.07
0.400
8.61
26.56
0.0
Composite
6.45
104.75
1100.
8.81
0.405
8.64
26.65
Average
5.97
102.92
1081.
8.45
0.398
8.81
27.18
NINE MODE
Test 6-3
Test 6-4
Average
HC,
g/kW-hr
1.704
1.446
1.575
CO,
g/kW-hr
43.194
40.632
41.913
co2,
g/kW-hr
—
—
—
NOX,
g/kW-hr
8.354
8.698
8.526
SFC,
kg/kW-hr
0.391
0.389
0.390
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1978 IHC 404 CID V-8 S/N 404-053483
Rated Power: 189 hp at 3600 rpm
Rated Torque: 323 ft-lbs at 2200 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 545 rpm
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel
g/km£
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 5.97 (4.45) HC
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 102.92 (76.75) c0
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) g.45 (6.30) N0X
15.00
258.59
21.23
5.05
87 .10
7.15
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.398 (0.655)
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 8.81 (11.81)
FUEL CONS.
337.
Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 1003
-------
TABLE F-2 (Cont'd). ENGINE 6 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHC 404
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot
Cycle
TEST 6-3
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
25.72
27.42
13.86
7.81
12.00
15.61
9.64
7.76
CO, gram
242.57
314.24
513.06
104.99
139.41
217.62
405.83
101.29
CO2, gram
1183.1
2079.0
5485.2
1002.8
976.5
1997.2
5509.1
1017.3
NOX, gram
2.82
10.86
47.42
5.67
4.38
11.94
51.68
5.62
FUEL, kg
0.519
0.838
1.997
0.376
0.389
0.753
1.947
0.379
KW-HR
0.82
1.78
5.77
0.75
0.72
1.72
5.78
0.73
TEST 6-4
HC, gram
22.25
37.68
20.00
9.17
13.74
16.70
11.61
8.23
CO, gram
232.73
412.18
549.90
100.68
146.38
213.19
377.88
104.20
C02, gram
1175.0
2169.9
5521.0
983.6
955.9
2005.9
5436.5
1046.0
NOX, gram
2.76
11.05
44.39
5.61
4.06
12.94
54.98
6.09
FUEL, kg
0.508
0.926
2.030
0.369
0.388
0.755
1.913
0.390
KW-HR
0.73
1.79
5.57
0.71
0.69
1.66
5.54
0.71
POWER
MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. - 80 F
Baro. -
29.11 In.
Hg
RPM
Tg_
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
_
1100
274
2100
300
3100
272
4100
—
1200
277
2200
300
3200
267
4200
_
1300
281
2300
299
3300
261
4 300
400
209
1400
285
2400
298
3400
255
4400
500
255
1500
288
2500
296
3500
249
4500
600
266
1600
291
2600
293
3600
242
4600
700
267
1700
294
2700
290
3700
236
4700
800
265
1800
296
2800
286
3800
231
4800
900
267
1900
298
2900
282
3900
225
4900
1000
270
2000
299
3000
277
4000
220
5000
cBarometric Pressure: Test 6-3 = 753 mm Hg Test 6-4 = 749 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE F-3. ENGINE.7 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 Chevrolet 454
TRANSIENT CYCLE
HC,
CO,
c02 >
NOX,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
Cold
6.21
80.13
1070.
9.24
TEST 7-2
Hot
2.79
68.52
1096.
8.95
Composite
3.28
70.18
1092.
8.99
Cold
7.46
75.85
1069.
8.65
TEST 7-3
Hot
2.68
65.24
1019.
8.39
Composite
3.36
66.76
1026.
8.43
Average
3.32
68.47
1059.
8 .71
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
KW-HR DEV.
0.383
9.86
30.42
-5.4
0.382
10.45
32.24
0.2
0.382
10.37
31.98
0.382
10.30
31.78
-1.2
0.356
10.66
32.89
2.3
0.360
10.61
32.73
0.371
10.49
32.36
NINE MODE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
Test 7-1
0.787
27.021
7.617
0.386
Test 7-2
0.731
26.069
7.998
0.402
Average
0.759
26.545
7.808
0.394
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1978 Chevrolet 454 CID S/N 364776
Rated Power: 240 hp at 3800 rpm
Rated Torque: 370 ft-lbs at 2800 rpm
Measured Idle Speed: 680 rpm
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel
g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 3.32 2.48
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 68.47 51.06
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 8.71 6.50
HC
CO
NOX
8.95
184.56
23.48
3.35
69.00
8.78
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.371 0.610
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 10.49 14.07
FUEL CONS.
374.
f* Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
-------
TABLE F-3 (Cont'd). ENGINE 7 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 Chevrolet 454
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS c
Cold
Cycle
Hot
Cycle
TEST 7-2
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
HC, gram
26.23
22.13
9.16
3.75
7.93
9.52
7.31
4.44
CO, gram
172.87
208.24
285.52
123.57
141.04
167.23
283.93
123.59
CO2/ gram
1121.6
2449.1
5823.3
1162.0
1343.6
2446.7
6323.3
1333.0
NOX, gram
2.65
18.10
64.33
6.01
7.05
17.23
63.23
5.95
FUEL, kg
0.465
0.897
1.986
0.431
0.501
0.864
2.141
0.486
KW-HR
0.50
2.04
6.60
0.72
0.89
2.05
6.62
0.89
TEST 7-3
HC, gram
43.34
20.89
8.32
4.31
8.21
8.83
7.11
4.39
CO, gram
196.87
206.71
262.31
115.05
149.91
174.30
250.84
120.58
CO2, gram
1152.7
2513.0
5987.8
1350.2
1224.1
2387.3
5898.5
1350.9
NOX, gram
3.55
17.05
63.15
5.33
5.66
14.40
64.19
5.18
FUEL, kg
0.504
0.916
2.026
0.487
0.468
0.848
1.991
0.490
KW-HR
0.62
2.08
6.68
0.91
0.92
2.11
6.71
0.92
POWER
MAPPING (TQ in
ft-lb)
@ Temp. -
¦ 84 °F
Baro.
. - 28.89 in Hq
RPM
T Q
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
318
2100
362
3100
346
4100
-
1200
326
2200
363
3200
342
4200
-
1300
334
2300
363
3300
338
4300
400
284
1400
340
2400
362
3400
333
4400
500
314
1500
346
2500
361
3500
314
4500
600
318
1600
350
2600
360
3600
296
4600
700
316
1700
354
2700
358
3700
240
4700
800
313
1800
357
2800
356
3800
213
4800
900
306
1900
360
2900
353
3900
0
4900
1000
309
2000
361
3000
350
4000
5000
c Barometric Pressure:
Test
7-2 = 751 mm Hg
Test
7-3 =
749 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE f-4. ENGINE 8 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHC 404
TRANSIENT CYCLE
TEST 8-4
TEST 8-5
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
WORK,
POWER,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
Cold
17.55
127.87
1081.
6.17
0.422
8.67
26.75
Hot
3.00
69.58
1071.
7.04
0.375
8.67
26.75
Composite
5.08
77.91
1072.
6.92
0.382
8.67
26.75
Cold
14.02
119.88
1103.
5.51
0 .421
8 .39
25.88
Hot
3.72
70.27
1092.
6.64
0.383
8.37
25.82
Composite
5.19
77.36
1094.
6.48
0.388
8.37
25.83
Average
5.14
77.64
1083.
6.70
0.385
8.52
26.29
NINE MODE
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
SFC,
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
kg/kW-hr
Test 8-3
1.754
35.758
4.969
0.428
Test 8-5
1.295
24.336
5.705
0.407
Average
1.525
20.047
5.337
0.418
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1978 IHC 404 CID S/N 404-053483
Rated Power: 189 hp at 3600 rpm
Rated Torque: 323ft-lbs at 2200 rpm
550 rpm
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel g/kma
HC,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
5.14
(3.83)
HC
13.35
4.21
CO,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
77.64
(57.90)
CO
201.66
63.54
NOX,
g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr)
6.70
(5.00)
NOX
17.40
5.48
SFC,
kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr)
0.385
(0.633)
FUEL CONS.
—
315.
WORK,
kw-hr (hp-hr)
8.52
(11.43)
3 Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd). ENGINE 8 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHG 404
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
TEST 8-4
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.b
TEST 8-5
Standard Error
Slope
Corr. Coef.
Intercept
Points Used
kW-hr Dev.b
Hot Cycle
Speed
74.
.981
.9933
40.
1144.
41
.989
.9980
21.
1144
Torque
13.%
.784
.8255
32.0
1139.
¦ -0.1 --
13.%
.759
.8150
29.5
1140
- -3.4 —
Power
9. %
.923
.9532
3.5
1139.
9.%
.897
.9410
2.9
1140
Speed
36.
.992
.9985
17.
1144.
41.
.991
.9980
21.
1144
Torque
9.%
.882
.9254
18.0
1144.
-0.1 —
7.%
.883
.9485
11.1
1144
-3.8 --
Power
7.%
.952
.9701
2.7
1144.
7.%
.923
.9630
2.1
1144
TRANSIENT
CYCLE MODAL
RESULTS c
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST 8-4
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
I1C, gram
60.46
58.56
20.27
3.88
7.02
9.01
5.50
4.45
CO, gram
284,25
360.69
392.78
70.89
137.32
158.17
236.59
71.49
CO2, gram
1097.4
1996.7
5316.1
959.7
1026.5
2004.2
5276.4
978.6
N0Xf gram
2.31
7.69
39.92
3.59
3. 30
9.51
44.45
3.80
FUEL, kg
0.547
0.867
1.900
0.342
0.399
0.719
1.786
0.348
KW-HR
0.77
1.72
5.43
0.75
0.81
1.69
5.42
0.75
TEST 8-5
HC, gram
38.85
46.89
27.54
4.36
9.18
10.01
6.60
5.33
CO, gram
226.22
317.74
393.21
68.37
113.89
136.65
258.87
78.72
CO2, gram
1069.2
2003.1
5220.6
956.2
022.2
1968.3
5281.6
970.0
NOX, gram
1.93
7.29
33.57
3.40
2.73
8.83
40.78
3.20
FUEL, kg
0.488
0.836
1.868
0.340
0.356
0.698
1.800
0.350
KW-HR
0.69
1.68
5.28
0.74
0.72
1.64
5.28
0.73
Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
Barometric Pressure: Test 8.4 = 748 mm Hg Test 8.5 = 742 mm Hg -
-------
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd). ENGINE 8 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 IHC 404
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine:
1978 International Harvester 404 CID S/N 404-05483
Mfg. Spec.
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ RPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Idle RPM'
323 @ 2200
189 @ 3600
525 - 575
Measured
300 @ 2200
171 @ 3600
550
POWER MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. - 68 ° F
Baro.
_ 29.13" Hg
PPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
212
2100
300
3100
279
4100
-
1200
276
2200
300
3200
274
4200
-
1300
280
2300
300
3300
268
4300
400
208
1400
284
2400
300
3400
263
4400
500
251
1500
288
2500
298
3500
256
4500
600
260
1600
291
2600
296
3600
250
4600
700
262
1700
294
2700
294
3700
243
4700
800
258
1800
296
2800
291
3800
236
4800
900
262
1900
298
2900
288
3900
229
4900
1000
270
2000
299
3000
284
4000
221
5000
-------
TABLE F-S. ENGINE 10 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1979 GMC 292
TRANSIENT CYCLE
Cold
TEST
IQ-l
Hot
Composite
Cold
TEST
10-2
Hot
Composite
Averaae
HC,
CO,
co2,
NOX,
gAW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
g/kW-hr
11.63
130.96
980.
19.20
11.30
121.36
994.
18.86
11.35
122.73
922.
18.91
16.85
133.32
988.
15.90
13.25
120.03
970.
16.72
13.76
121.93
973,
16.60
12.56
122.33
983.
17. 76
SFC,
work:,
POWER,
kg/kW-hr
kW-hr
kW
0.385
6.13
18.91
0.385
6.21
19.16
0.385
6.20
19.12
0. 394
6.27
19. 34
0.379
6.30
19.44
0.381
6.30
19.43
0. 383
6.25
19.28
NINE MODE
TestjQ-4 Test 10-5 Average
HC, g/kW-hr 5.059 5.788 5.424
CO, g/kW-hr 62.601 72.006 67.304
C02 / g/kW-hr — — —
NOX, g/kW-hr 16.G99 18.760 17.730
SFC, kg/kW-hr 0.421 0.426 0.424
TRANSIENT CYCLE AVERAGE VALUES
g/kq Fuel g/kma
HC, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 12.56 (9.37) HC 32.79 7.54
CO, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 122.33 (91.22) CO 164.05 73.45
NOX, g/kW-hr (g/hp-hr) 17.76 (13.24) NOX 46.37 10.66
SFC, kg/kW-hr(lb/hp-hr) 0.383 (0.630) FUEL CONS. — 230.
WORK, kW-hr (hp-hr) 6.25 (8,38)
a Using a composite value of 10.41 km for the Transient Cycle.
-------
TABLE F-5 (Cont1
¦d). ENGINE
10 SUMMARY OF
RESULTS
1978 CMC
292
TRANSIENT CYCLE STATISTICS
Cold Cycle
Hot Cycle
TEST
Speed
Torque
Power
Speed
Torque
Power
Standard Error
42.
9.%
6.%
35.
8.%
6. %
Slope
1.002
.929
.990
1.001
.930
.991
Corr. Coef.
.9976
.9262
.9825
.9983
.9316
.9835
Intercept
13.
8.4
.9
20.
9.6
1.4
Points Used
1144
1114
1114
1144
1109
1109
1 Q _
j.j.
TEST
Standard Error
42.
8.%
6. %
50.
9.%
7.%
Slope
.999
.946
1.000
.998
.942
1.003
Corr. Coef.
.9975
.9379
.9851
.9965
.9317
.9803
Intercept
13.
9.0
1.1
23.
9.3
1.2
Points Used
1144
112 8
112 8
1144
1136
1136
kW-hr Dev.b
A. 7
4.7
TRANSIENT CYCLE MODAL RESULTS0
Cold Cycle Hot Cycle
Test
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
NYNF
LANF
LAF
HC, gram
43.85
12.37
7.99
7.06
45.93
9.76
7.49
CO, gram
296.80
143.61
309.18
52.86
262.73
123.83
309.86
CO2/ gram
619.4
1291.4
3446.0
646.3
639.7
1332.3
3564.1
NOX, gram
3.90
22.44
81.77
9.53
3.42
22. 32
82.26
FUEL, kg
0. 386
0.491
1.247
0.237
0.378
0.491
1.285
KW-HR
0.64
1.23
3.74
0.52
0.68
1.23
3.76
TEST
HC, gram
68.91
16.54
10.22
10.00
49.22
14.17
10.42
CO, gram
347.05
140.38
293.60
55.02
283.41
126.16
290.34
CO2 gram
655.1
1326.3
3565.2
650.6
647.1
1298.0
3530.6
NOX, gram
3.51
18.14
70.36
7.69
2.88
19.26
75.23
FUEL, kg
0.447
0.504
1.280
0.242
0.394
0.486
1.267
KW-HR
0.71
1.24
3.78
0.54
0.72
1.24
3.80
NYNF
6.95
56.81
634. 8
9.09
0.235
0.54
9.69
56. 36
639.2
7.98
0.239
0.54
^Test kW-hr minus Reference kW-hr divided by the Reference kW-hr times 100%.
cBarometric Pressure: Test 10-1 = 741 mm Hg Testl0-2 = 741 mm Hg.
-------
TABLE F-5 (Cont
ENGINE DESCRIPTION
Engine: 1979 General Motors 292 CID
Max. Engine Torque, Ft-Lb @ PPM
Max. Engine Power, HP @ RPM
Idle RPM
POWER
MAPPING
(TQ in ft-lb) @
Temp. - 70
RPM
TQ
RPM
TQ
RPM
-
1100
217
2100
-
1200
219
2200
-
1300
220
2300
400
1400
220
2400
500
164
1500
220
2500
600
189
1600
219
2600
700
198
1700
217
2700
800
205
1800
215
2800
900
210
1900
213
2900
1000
214
2000
211
3000
ENGINE 10 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
1978 GMC 292
Mfg. Specs. Measured
215 @ 1600 220 @ 1400
115 @ 3400 108
-------
tNGINF NO. I HI <11
EnGINF. rfliOEL 7S
ENGINE b.b I.(1it1 CIO) V-H
CVS N(l. q
8 AROMF. TEH 735,5M HG(eS.S(, IN Hli)
dry buir ir'ip, 2b.? ofcG c(an.n i>eg f)
OAS RFSULir,
BAG NUMHCH
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER UIF P MM. H?0(]N. H?U)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HeOflN. lt?0)
BLOWER INIFT TEmP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME StCONUS
TOTAL FLOW STI). CD. METRES(SCF)
HC SAUpLfc Mt: IFR/HAWGE/PPrt
HC HCKCKD HElKH/RANGE/PPM
CO SAhPLE METLfv/KANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRC MElEB/RANGE/PPrt
COP SAMPLE METEH/UANGE/PCT
CO? bC«G»<0 MF 1 F R/RArlG£/PCT
V NOX SAt-Pl.F "F I EH/rtANGE/PPM
NOX UCKGKD MtIEH/RANGE/PPM
ip>
DILUTION FACTOK
HC CONCrNlRAlIljN PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COP CONCCNTRAlION PCT
NOX CO'-'CCNTHAT I(IN PP"
HC MASS G*Ah5
CO MASS GfcAI-lS
CO? «AS3 GkamS
NPX MASS GMAflS
FUEL KG (Lrt)
KW MH I HP HW)
HSHC G/KW HH (G/HP HW)
HSCO G/K>< H« (.U/tlP HK)
BSC02 G/KK HK (G/HP HR)
BSNUX &/KH HK (li/MP HR)
ftSFC KG/Kft HH (L«/HP Hli)
TOTAL lESr lH.SOt.T5 t BAGS
TOTAL Kw Or (HP MM)
BSHC G/KW HK (G/HP HH)
BSCO G/K- HK (G/HP HR)
BSCU2 G/K » Hrf (G/HP HK)
»SKOX R/Krt HH (G/HP H«)
BSFC KG/KW HK (LB/HP HH)
B.H2 ( 11.M)
B.D? ( 5.98)
127.12 ( 91.79)
1152 £ 859)
7.33 C S.Hb)
.131 ( .71*)
TABLE F-6A. TFST 1-3 EMISSIONS RFSHLTS
'COLO TRANSIENT PROJECT NU. 11-5011-001
TEST NO. 1-R HON
DATE 9/11/7R
TIME lilt 11 GASOLINE tM-2fe?-F
UYNO NtJ. 2 BAG CAR 1 NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 81 PCT
ABSOLOTE HUMIDITY 19.1 Grt/KG(133,9 GRAlNS/LH) NOX HUNIOITY C.F, 1.3H2S
1
NYNF
H9b.ll (27.1)
is?.2 (ta.ii)
51.1 (1311. II)
7 I b9
272.11
17b. 9 ( b250)
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
172.1 (IB.b)
55.0 (131,0)
H08B
3ll?.0
19B.9 ( 7021)
3
LAF
7b2. 0 (3D,0)
5*1.0 (21,i)
Sb,7 (131,0)
8 317
31b,0
201,7 ( 712*)
1
NYNF
70H.7 (27,1)
1b1,8 (IB,3)
51.1 (130.U)
71b5
272.0
17b,b ( b23B)
37.1/
3/
371
,7/
3/
7
b2.ll/
3/
1 82b
.1/
3/
3
25.3/
3/
.n
2.7/
3/
.01
8 . b/
2/
9
.1/
2/
0
21 .31
3 b?
1751
.38
R.5
19.7/
3/
197
1.3/
3/
13
lb . 1 /
3/
1358
.1/
3/
3
3n.a/
3/
2.^/
3/
.01
17.9/
2/
18
.1/
2/
0
lb,87
IBS
1 301
.hi
17.8
83.3/
2/
83
10.9/
2/
11
51,1/
3/
1593
.7/
3/
21
81.5/
3/
l.Sib
2.1/
3/
.03
88.3/
2/
B8
,b/
2/
1
7.BO
71
1181
1,53
87. 8
13.U/ 2/ 13
9,1/ 2/ i
19.1/ 3/ 5b9
.7/ 3/ 21
22,1/ 3/ ,3b
2.3/ 3/ .11.1
10.b/ 2/ 11
1.1/ 2/ 1
31.b5
31
521
,33
9.5
37, 19 21,19 8,58 3.18
3b5.12 301.38 318.51 10B.B1
1215.3 2221.0 SbSb.7 10b?,9
3.98 S.37 lb.82 1,15
*bOD ( 1.32) ,871 ( 1,92) l,9h1 I 1,33) .391 ( ,37)
.91 ( 1.2?) 1.77 ( 2,37) 5,35 I 7,18) .79 ( 1,0b)
11.2b ( 30.77) 12.110 ( 8,95) l.bo t 1,20) 1,39 ( 3.27)
398.BB ( 297.11) 1711.5B ( 127,20) b5.11 I 18.57) 137.n5 ( 102.20)
1337.52 { 997.39) 12S7.ll ( 937,15) 1057,20 I 7B8.35) 1315.13 (1003.07)
1.J8 ( 3.27) 5.30 ( 3.95) 8.75 I b.53) 5.bl ( 1.18)
.bbl ( 1.08b) .193 ( .Bin) . 3b7 I ,bU1) ,19b ( ,Blb)
PARTICULATE OA IA» TOTAL FOR 1 BAGS
90*M FILTtH
SAHPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED FOX
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIEH FOR
SCM(SCF)
G/TfcST
G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FULL)
U.UOO ( 0,00)
11,0(10
n.iionii (u.oooii)
n.duoo (u.doom)
?n X 211 F1LTEHS
SAMPLE FLOw
SCM(SCF)
(i.on ( o.»)
-------
TABLE F-6A (CONT'D). TEST 1-8 EMISSIONS RESULTS
hot transient
PROJECT Uti, U-5a**-nill
ENGINE NIJ.IH*))*
ENGINE MOREL 79
Engine b.h L(*n* cm) v-s
CVS NO. 9
TEST NO. l-q
DATE 9/11/78
TIME Ui:S2
DVNt) MO, 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM-2(,7-F
BAG CARt NO. 2
8ARHNCTF.R 735.5B HG(2R.9b 1N HG)
1>RY BllLH ICMp. 27.2 OEG C(81.n DEU F)
BAG RESULlS
BAG NUMBER
OESCRIPTIGN
BLOWER OIF P
BLOWER INLET
HLOwER I«LEf TEMP. OEG
BLOWER HEV'lL'JTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* SIl'. CU. METRES(SCF)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 78 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUHIDITT 18.* GM/KG(129.1 GRAINS/LB)
U1
MM. HgU(JN, HgCl)
P MM. H«?0(lN. H20)
C(OEG. F)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRG
SANPLE
HCKGRl)
CO? SAMPLE
CO? PCKGRC
NOX SAMPLE
NOX HCKGKU
ME I F R/RAUGE/PPM
Mb TEH/RAMUE/PPM
MEIEH/RANGE/PPM
MEIEH/KANGE/PPM
MEIEFt/RANGE/PCT
MfcTEP/RANGE/PCT
^FTEK/RANGE/PPM
MfctER/RANGE/PPM
dilution factor
HC C0NCfMr«/lll0M PPM
CO CONCt.NTRAl 10H PPM
CO? COf'CO.TrfAt ION PCT
NOX CONCr.KTRAl lltN PPM
NOX HUMIDITT C.F. 1.3*0R
1
NYNF
bib.a
*57.2 (IB.II)
5*,* (I3fl.fi)
71b7
27?.n
17b,9 ( h2*B)
R5.S/ 2/
9.9/ 2/
19.*/ 3/
.9/ 3/
02.2/ 3/
2.1/ 3/
10.9/ 2/
.b/ 2/
31.52
7b
533
.33
in.3
85
i n
577
28
.3b
.03
11
1
2
lanf
711.2 (28,0)
*72.* (18,b)
55.0 (131,UJ
"087
30 0
1^.12
73
«37
.57
H.7
3
LAF
7b2.(J (30.OJ
5*1.0 (21.3J
5b.7 (131.U)
8 31*
31b,0
198.0
(
7023)
201.b
(
7121)
83.1/
2/
83
7b.9/
2/
77
10.*/
2/
10
B, 7/
2/
9
30.3/
3/
895
55.(1/
3/
lb20
.1/
3/
28
.8/
3/
2*
3b.1/
3/
.bl
8* ,0/
3/
1.55
2.2/
3/
.03
2.2/
3/
.03
211.3/
2/
20
911,0/
2/
90
.b/
2/
1
.8/
2/
1
f .8*
b9
1510
1.52
89.3
*
NYNF
7118.7 (27."*)
*b*.B (18.3)
St.H (130.U)
71b*
272.0
17b,b
(
b237
50,0/
2/
511
2/
8
18. V
3/
Sb3
.*•/
3/
28
22.b/
3/
.3?
2,0/
3/
.03
11,3/
2/
11
.»/
2/
1
31,38
*3
519
.3*
10,5
HC MASS GRAMS
7.75
B.*fl
U.tJb
H.3*
cn MASS GRAMS
1119.75
193.Rtl
35*.11
10*i • b 3
CO? MASS GRAMS
10b8.1
20<«1,7
5blJB, 8
10^3,3
NOX MASS GRAMS
* , KB
I'J.Ob
*b.lR
*.77
FUEL KG (LH)
.319
( .88)
.7b*
C
l.bB)
1.952
H.30)
.*02
(
.89)
KK HR (HP HR)
.79
( l.nb)
A.71
(
2,29)
5.30
(
7.11)
.79
(
l.nb)
BSHC G/Kw HR (G/HP HR)
9.81
( 7.32)
*.92
(
3,b7)
1.52
I
1.13)
5.*7
(
*.08)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
139.U*
( 11)3.•>«)
113.53
(
fl*.bb)
bb.Bl
(
*9,82)
13*.32
c
100.1b)
6SC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1353.18
(1009.ti?)
1225,3)1
(
913,71)
1057.31
I
788,1*)
1377.20
(102b,9B)
ftSNOX U/KK HR (G/HP hH)
5. 9 J
( *.*2)
5.9ft
(
*.*())
8.70
I.
(..*9)
b.Ol
(
* . *8)
BSFC KG/Kki HR (Lrt/Hp HR)
.5115
C .331)
.**7
(
.73b)
• 3b8
(
.b»5)
.50b
(
.832)
TOtAL TEST RESULT8 » BAGS
TOTAL Krt H« (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW Hrf (G/HP HH)
B5C0 G/KH HH (G/rtP MR)
BSCO? G/KW rlH (G/HP H*)
BSMOX G/Kh HR (G/HP Hp)
BSFC KK/Kh HR (LB/HP HR)
particulate data, total po« * hags
R.MI ( 11,53)
3,32 ( 2. * 8)
BR.Sb ( bh.3*)
11*7 ( 85b)
7.b* ( 5.7D)
,*l>9 ( .b73)
90Mrt FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
multiplier FOR
2)1 X 2li FILTERS
SAMPLE FLU"
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
n.ouu i a.un)
(1.000
u.unno (u.ouuu)
u.autiri (u.uuou)
11.01* ( 0.11)
-------
TAELE F-6B. .TEST 1-9 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PKOJECT NU. Xl-SOHt-Otl 1
ENGINE uo.Iri*n*
ENGINE MOPfcL 71
EnGInE h.b L (*n>t CID) V-R
cvs nd. i
BAROMfTEK 73*.Ob MM Hli ( 28 , 911 IN HG)
ORY BULH TEf'P. 27.2 DEG C(H1.0 11 EG F)
TEST NO. 1-1 RUN
DATE 1/12/78
TIME US J II(J
DVNn MO. 2
gasoline trt-ab?-F
SAG CAKI NO. 2
RELATIVE HIJMIOITV 81 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 14.3 GM/KG(13*.8 GhAInS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1,3111
BAG RESULTS
BAG UlJMHEK
DESCklPTIOfJ
BLOWER DIF P MM, Hj0 ( IN . H;>0 )
BLOKES INLET
BLUwEr IriLET
BLHWEH REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
P MM. H20 (IN. H20)
TEmP. Df-G. C (DEG. F)
DILUTION FACTUM
HC CONCFnTUATIuN PPH
CO CONCEt« TR A I I ON PPH
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
i
NYNF
blb.O (27.*)
*57.2 (1B.0)
5*.* (13H.O)
?!b1
272.0
21 .b3
35b
IMS
.37
7.1
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.h)
55.U (131.0)
80S0
307,o
TOTAL FLOK
STU. CU, METRES(SCF)
17b.5
(
b23b)
118.*
(
700H)
hc sample
meikp/Range/ppm
3b.*/
3/
3t>t
11.*/
3/
11*
hc hckgrd
mmer/kamge/fpm
.8/
3/
8
l.»/
3/
1*
CO SAMPLE
me TEW/RANGE/PPM
51.1/
3/
17fe*
*1.2/
3/
1302
CO hckgrd
METER/RANGE/PPM
.2/
3/
b
.1/
3/
3
CO? SAfPLE
ME1ER/RANGE/PCT
25.2/
3/
.HI
38.1/
3/
. hb
CO? HCKGRD
METER/RANGt/PCT
3.2/
3/
,05
,1/
3/
.00
NO X SAMPLE
Mf f£W/RANGE/PPM
8.1/
2/
J?
11.0/
2/
11
NOX fJCKGUD
Mt TER/HANUE/PPM
.2/
2/
0
.3/
2/
0
lb.72
181
12*8
• bb
1«.7
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
55.b (133.U)
831b
31b,0
201.fl ( 7121)
Bb,1/ 2/ Bb
11.1/ 2/ 12
Sq.8/ 3/ 17bl
.1/ 3/ 28
8*.7/ 3/ 1.5b
3.1/ 3/ .05
83.3/ 2/ U3
.7/ if 1
7.71
7b
lb3B
1.52
82.7
*
NYNF
708,7 127.1)
*b*,B (18.3)
5*,* (130.U)
71b*
272.0
17b,2
(
b223)
* R . U/
2/
*8
1.5/
2/
10
20.0/
3/
S15
.8/
3/
2*
23,*/
3/
.38
3.2/
3/
.05
1,1/
2/
10
.7/
2/
1
30.20
31
552
.33
1.2
HC MASS GKAMS
3b.2
20.70
B.Br
3.1*
CO MASS GrAmS
3*1.Ob
288.*?
3 8 S , 0 b
113.23
CO? MUSS GRAMS
118 3,0
238?,b
5b2?,8
1077,8
NOX M A S f> GrtArtS
3.72
1.88
**.*1
*.32
Fl'FL KG (Lrt)
.5H2
(
1.28)
.115
(
2.02)
1« 17*
I
*.35)
.*~(!
(
.88)
KW HR (HP HR)
.1(1
(
1.21)
1.75
(
2.35)
5.30
I
7.11)
.78
(
1.05)
RSHC G/Kh Hr (G/Hp Hh)
*0.35
(
30,01)
11.81
(
8.80)
l,bb
I
1.2*)
5.03
(
3,75)
BSCO G/KW HP (G/HP HR)
38B.II1
(
281,*0)
lbt.Sb
(
122,71)
72,b5
I
5*.IB)
1**,21
(
107.bO)
BSCO? G/KK HK (G/HP »IR)
1315.3D
(
180.82)
1351.17
(1013.53)
1 llbl. 80
I
711.78)
1373.52
(1(12*.2*)
BSNOX li/Kr, hh (G/HP MR)
*.13
(
3.1)8)
S.b*
(
*.20)
8 . 3B
I
b.25)
5.51
c
*.11)
BSFC KG/K* Hk (LU/HP HR)
. b* 7
C
1.0b*)
• 522
(
.858)
.372
I
.t-12)
.501
(
.838)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
PARTICULATE DATa, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (MP H|J )
HSHC G/Kw HK (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/M" HW (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KW HW (G/HP HR)
HSNOX G/KW HK (G/Hp H«)
BSFC KG/rfh UK (Lrt/HP HR)
8.7* ( 11.72)
7.1« ( 5.15)
lill.110 t Ib.lH)
117b ( B77)
7.13 ( 5.32)
, * * 3 ( .728)
InMM FILTEH
SAMPLE FLUrt
MULTIPLIER FOH
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
?» X ?ii FILTERS
3AMPLE FLU*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/Krf HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/L« FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
o.ooo c o.no)
11.000
ii.oiKio (u.niion)
0,0000 (U.O(IIIU)
ii.no ( o.o)
-------
TABLE F-6B (CONT'D). TEST 1-9 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
project nu. 11-50*4-0111
ENGINE *W,IHinv
ENGINE MODEL 71
ENGINE b.b L(4il4 C ID) V-R
CVS NO, 1
BAROMFTER 734.lb MM HGC2S.1H I" Hti)
Dry uulo temp. ?h.3 dPr C(R3.n oEr F)
TEST NO. 1-1 RUN
DATE 1/12/7B
TIME o?:4i
dyno no, 2
GASOLINE tM-Bh?-F
BAG CAR I NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 75 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.8 G«/KG(131.7 GRAINS/LBJ
NOX HUMILITY C,F. 1, 3b3b
BAG RfSULTS
BAG NUrinrR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P
BLO*ER INLET
blo«er INLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOK STO. CIJ. HEIRES(SCF)
K*. H2UCTM. HJU)
f MM. H?(1(IN. H20)
JEhP. OEG. CCDEG. F)
1
NYNF
blb.O (27,4)
457.2 (18,1))
54.4 (13D.11)
7 I hfl
272.1)
t 7b. 5 ( 1.535)
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
H72.4 (18,b)
S5.ll (131.0)
80B7
30 7. u
IIP.4 ( 7008)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (3D.U)
511.0 (21.3)
57.2 (135.U)
83 lb
31b,0
200.1 ( 7USb)
4
NYNF
708.7 (27,1)
4b4.8 (18,3)
54.* (130.11)
71b 3
272,Q
17b.e ( base)
HC SAMPLE MF1ER/RANGE/PPM
7b.3/ 2/
7b
82.7/ 2/
83
7b,*/ 2/
7b
48,8/ 2/
41
HC bCKGHD MET FR/RANGE/PPM
1.1/ 2/
1
8,1/ 2/
8
7,1/ 2/
7
7,1/ 2/
B
CO SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
20.1/ 3/
518
30.4/ 3/
818
55.3/ 3/
lb28
20.b/ 3/
bl2
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPH
.7/ 3/
21
,8/ 3/
24
.1/ 3/
28
,8/ 3/
24
CO? SACiPLE MEIEK/RANGE/PCT
23.3/ 3/
.38
37,3/ 3/
»b3
84,0/ 3/
1.55
23.1/ 3/
.31
CO? HCKGRD MEIEk/RANGE/PCT
3.5/ 3/
.05
3.S/ 3/
.05
3.3/ 3/
.05
3.*/ 3/
.05
NOX SAMPLE «EIFR/RANGE/PPM
10.b/ 2/
11
ao.i/ 2/
20
91,5/ 2/
81
10.2/ 2/
111
NOX bCKGRO MF1FR/RANGE/PPM
.b/ 2/
1
,b/ 2/
1
,b/ 2/
1
.8/ 2/
1
0ILMI10N FACTUM
30.10
18.54
•
CO
*
21.50
hC COWCEN'IRA 1 ION PPM
bn
75
70
41
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
551
843
1517
570
CO? CUHCENTRA1 inn PCT
.33
.58
1.50
.34
nox concentration ppm
10.0
l^S
B1.0
1,4
HC MASS GNArtS h.B7 8.59 8.13 4,18
CO MASS GRAMS 11 *.B7 114.82 354.14 Ub.l*
CO? MASS GRAhS 105*1,7 20^7,2 5534.5 101b.0
NOX MASS GKAnS *,bl 10.11 4b , b3 *,33
FUEL KG (LB) .318 ( .SB) ,7bb ( l.bl) 1.121 I 4.25) .4t>8 ( .10)
KW HR (HP HR) .77 ( 1.03) 1.70 { 2.28) 5,30 I 7.11) .78 ( 1.05)
8SHC G/Kfi MR I G/HP HW)
BSCl) C/KU Hr (K/Hp Hff)
BSCO? G/K* Hk (G/HP HR)
BSNOX U/K
-------
TABLE F-7A, TEST 6-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. li-sim-oni
ENGTNE N0.IH4fl4
ENGINE MODEL 7* IH 4H4
ENGINE b.b L(404 CID) V-a
CVS NO. 9
BAROMETER 753.11 MM HG(29,b5 IN HG)
t)RY bulb TEMp. 25.0 REG C(77.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. HSOCIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. Hao)
HLfWER INLET TEmP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW. STU. CU. MF.TRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MtlEH/RANGR/PPM
HC BCKGRD METFR/KANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METFR/RANGF/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MEfER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGtfO Mf.TER/RANliE/PCT
nj NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
' NOX HCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCCMTRAlION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTHAIION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
TEST NO. b-3
DATE 1/ 4/79
TIME 1)9140
DYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM.2h7_F
BAG CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 2U PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 4.U GM/KG( 27.8 GrAIns/LB)
NUX HUMIDITY C.F. .8184
1
NYNF
blb.O (27.4)
457.a (I8.U)
54.5
10
1
2
lanf
711,2 (28,0)
47a.4 (18. b)
54.4 (130.0)
8089
307.0
20R.7 ( 7371)
24.2/ 3/
1.5/ 3/
242
15
*5.3/ 3/ 133H
.b/ 3/
35.3/ 3/
3,3/ 3/
33.7/ 2/
.5/ 2/
17.94
228
1293
.54
33.2
IB
.59
.05
3*
1
3
LAF
7b2.ll (30.U)
5*1.0 (21.3)
54.4 (130.U)
8317
31b.0
212,1 ( 7521)
12.b/ 3/ 12b
1.5/ 3/ 15
73,b/ 3/ 21bS
,8/ 3/ 2*
71,5/ 3/ 1.45
3.3/ 3/ .U5
47,5/ 3/ 1*2
.1/ 3/ 0
8.01
113
20b9
I.HI
1*2.2
4
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
4b4.8 (18.3)
54.4 (130.(1)
7191
273.0
1H5.7 ( b558)
85.3/ 2/
12.8/ 2/
17.1/ 3/
.b/ 3/
21.4/ 3/
3.5/ 3/
20.U/ 2/
.5/ 2/
33.02
73
48b
.a*
11.5
85
13
51!)
18
.35
.05
au
l
HC MASS GRAMS
25.72
27.42
13.6b
7,81
CO MASS GRAMS
242,57
314.24
513.0b
104.99
C02 MASS GRAMS
1183.1
2079.tl
5485,2
1002.8
NOX MASS GRAMS
a.82
10.Bb
47.42
5,b7
FUFL KG (LH)
.519
(
1.14)
.838
(
1.85)
1,117
(
4.40)
.37b
(
,83)
KW HR (HP HK)
.82
(
1.01)
1.78
(
2.39)
5,77
I
7.74)
.75
(
1.00)
BSHC G/KW HR IG/HP HR)
31.51
(
23.5(1)
15.41
(
11,49)
2,40
I
1.79)
10.45
(
7.79)
BSCO G/KW HR IG/HP HK)
a<*7.i8
(
221.bl)
17b.53
(
131.4.4)
B8.93
I
hb.3a)
140.53
(
104.71)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1449.47
(108(1.8?)
1lb 7.94
(
870,93)
95U,78
(.
7n9.no)
1342.34
(1(100. 11)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HH)
3.45
(
2.SB)
*>.10
(
4.55)
e.aa
1
b . 1 3 )
7.59
(
5. bb)
HSFC KG/KK HR (LH/HP HR)
. b 3 h
(
1.045)
.471
(
.774)
.34b
(
.Sb9)
.503
(
.827)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW HR (HP HR)
HSHC G/KN HK (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
HSC02 G/KW MR (G/HP HH)
0SNOX G/KW hR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HK (LH/HP HR)
9.11 ( 12.?2)
fi.21 ( b.12)
128.93 ( lb.14)
1(170 (
7.33 (
.409 (
798)
S. 4b)
. b73)
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
90MM FILTER
sample flow
MULTIPL I EH FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
?fl X 211 FILTERS
3AMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
G/Tt3T
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/L8 FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 ( 0.00)
II.DUO
U.dOUO (u.oooo)
11,0000 (U.OOUO)
it,no ( ii,ro
-------
TABLE F-7A (CONT'D). TEST 6-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PKOJECT NO. 1 l-Sll**-IMIl
EKGINF NO.IHHOH
ENGINE MOREL 79 XH
-------
TABLE F-7B, TEST 6-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COCO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. 11-5044-001
ENGINF N0.IH404
ENGINE MOOEL IH 404
Engine b.f> L(hoh ciO) v-s
cvs no. 9
BAROMFTER 749.30 MM HG(29.50 IN HG)
DRY BULB TFHP. 88.3 DEG C(83.0 DEG F)
BAG RFSULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOnER OIF P
BLOWER INLET
NJ
o
*H. H20(IN. H2D)
P MM. H20(IN. H20)
blower inlet temp. deg. c(oeg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
1IME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
hc sample mfter/kange/ppm
HC bCKGRl) METER/RANGE/PPM
CO sample meter/range/ppm
CO BCKGHO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PCT
COR BCKGHO MfTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTDH
HC CONCf f.TRA I ION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPm
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
TEST NO. b-4
DATE 1/ 5/79
time nqjio
DYNO NO. . 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM-Eb?-F
SAG CAR I NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 27 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.S GM/KGC H5.8 GRAINS/LB}
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .8794
1
NYNF
b9b.o (27.4)
457.2 (18.0)
54.4 (130,(1)
7 1 b9
272.0
184.3 ( bS09)
21.7/ 3/ 217
.8/ 3/ 8
37.V 3/ 111?
.S/ 3/ 15
24.2/ 3/ .HO
3.2/ 3/ ,05
9.4/ 2/ 9
.5/ 2/ 1
25.43
209
J0R5
.35
8.S
2
lanf
711.2 (28.0)
*72.4 (18.b)
54,4 (130,0)
flOSl
307 ,n
lb.3*
315
1?05
.57
31.b
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
541.0 (21.3)
54.4 (130.0)
uaiti
31b.0
207. b
(
7333)
211.8
(
74B0)
32.5/
3/
325
17.b/
3/
17b
1.1/
3/
11
1.*/
3/
1*
59,8/
3/
17bl
71,0/
3/
2320
.7/
3/
21
1.1/
3/
34
3b.b/
3/
.f»2
80.1/
3/
1.4b
3.1/
3/
.05
3.0/
3/
.05
32.1/
2/
32
*1,8/
3/
125
,5/
2/
1
.3/
3/
I
7.8b
lb4
220b
1.42
124.b
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
4b4.8 (18.3)
54.4 (130.0)
71b*
272.0
184.0 ( b4 98)
9.9/ 3/
1,3/ 3/
17,1/ 3/
1.1/ 3/
20.7/ 3/
2.M/ 3/
18.8/ 2/
,7/ 2/
33..S7
I
5.94)
7.90
( 5.89)
BSFC Ktt/KK HP (LB/HP HR)
,b93
(
1,139)
.51b
(
.84*)
.3b4
I
.599)
.520
( .854)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 4 BAGS
particulate data, total for 4 bags
TOTAL KW Mk (HP MR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HW)
BSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HP)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
H3N0< G/KN HK (G/HP HR)
HSFC KG/K* HH (IH/HP HR)
H.fll ( ll.fll)
10.IP ( 7.54)
14b.40 (J09.17)
1118 ( 834)
7.24 ( 5.10)
»*3S ( .715)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FL«W
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
20 X 2U FILTERS
sample flu»
SCH(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/Lfl FUEL)
SCM(SCF)
11.000 ( u.uo)
(1.000
n.oooo (u.oooo)
ii.ooon (u.oooo)
o.oo ( o.u)
-------
TABLE F-7B (CONT'D). TEST 6-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, 11-50*1-001
ENGINE NO.lH*l>*
ENGINE MODEL 71 IH *11*
ENGINE b,b L(*0* CIO)' V-B
CVS NO, q
BAROMETER 7*1.30 MM HG(21.50 IN HG)
DRY B"LB IE"P. 2b.7 DEG C(80,0 DEG F)
TEST NO. b-1
OATE I/ 5/71
TIME 01S*0
OYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE t«-2h7-F
BAG CAR I NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 30 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.S GM/KG{ 15,b GRAIUS/LB)
NO* HUMIOITY C.F. .8785
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
PLIlwER DIP P
BLOWER I"LET
BLOWER INLET
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
MM. HaOUN, HSU)
P Mh, HSO(IN, H20)
TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
1
NYNF
blb.O (27.*)
*57.? CIR.O)
5*.* (13n,0)
71b*
272.Cj
is*.i ( bsn*)
s
lanf
711,2 (28,0)
*72.* (18,b)
5*.* (130,0)
«08*
307.0
207,* ( 7327)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30,U)
5*1.0 (21,3)
5*,* (130,U)
8312
31biO
211,7 ( 7»?b)
*
NYNF
708,7 (87,1)
*b*.8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.n)
71h0
272.0
183.1 ( b*1*)
•*1
I
t\J
HC SAMPLE METF.R/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD ME TER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METCR/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE ME TER/RANGE/PPM
MO* HCKGRO ME TER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTUR
HC COnCENIRAIION PPM
CO COMCENTRA fI(IN PPM
CO? CflNCFN TRA T ION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
1*,1/ 3/ 1*1 15,0/ 3/ 1511 10,3/ 3/ 1U3
1,2/ 3/ 12 1,1/ 3/ 11 .1/ 3/ 1
2*,3/ 3/ 720 31.5/ 3/ 130 55,3/ 3/ lb28
,1/ 3/ 28 1,0/ 3/ 31 1,3/ 3/ *0
20,2/ 3/ ,33 3*,1/ 3/ ,57 71,0/ 3/ 1,**
2,1/ 3/ ,0* 2,1/ 3/ ,0* 2,8/ 3/ ,0*
13,7/ 2/ 1* 37,b/ 2/ 38 51,7/ 3/ 155
,b/ 2/ 1 .5/ 2/ 1 ,2/ 3/ 1
32.57 11.91 8,3*
121 1*1) 15
h83 883 1533
.28 .53 1,10
13,1 37.1 151,b
8*.b/ 2/
7.2/ 2/
17,8/ 3/
1.2/ 3/
21.7/ 3/
2.8/ 3/
20,2/ 2/
.5/ 2/
32.1b
78
*87
.31
11,7
85
7
5311
37
.35
.11*
20
1
HC MASS GRAMS
13.7*
lb.70
11.bl
8.23
CO MASS GWAMS
l*b.38
213,11
377.88
101.20
CO? MASS GRAMS
155.1
2005,1
5*3b,5
lOHb.O
NOX 1ASS GRAMS
*,nb
12,1*
51,18
b.UI
FUEL KG (LB)
. 3B8
(
,85)
.755
(
l.bb)
1,113
(
*.22)
. 3SU
(
,8b)
KW HR (HP HR)
.bl
(
.13)
l.hb
(
a.22)
5,5*
I
7.13)
,71
(
.lb)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
11.8b
(
ii.ai)
1U.U8
(
7,52)
e,ni
I
1,5b)
11,52
(
8,51)
BSCO G/Krt Hr CG/Hp HR)
211.bl
(
157.71)
128,77
(
lb.03)
b8,17
(
50.8*)
1*5,78
(
108.71)
BSCO? G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
1381,11
(1030,*1)
1211,bO
(
103,11)
180,75
(
731,35)
1* b3,3 3
(I
1111,21)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
S.87
(
*,38)
7.82
(
5,83)
1.12
I
7.10)
8.52
(
b.3b)
BSFC KG/KK HK (lb/HP HR)
.5b()
(
,121)
• *5b
(
,7*1)
.3*5
(
• 5b7)
.5*5
(
.81b)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR) 8.bl
H5HC G/KW HR (G/Hp HR) 5,8*
BSCO G/KW MR (G/HP HR) 17.81
8SC02 G/KW HH (G/HP HR) 1017
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HH) <1.117
HSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) .1UU
11.5*)
* , 3b)
72,13)
818)
h.77)
.b58)
PARTICULATE OATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
qilMM FILTER
sample fl"w
MULTIPLIER for
multiplied for
SCm(3CF)
g/test
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
0.1100 ( 0.00)
U.000
u.nnim (o,oonn)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) il.OOflO (li.nooo)
2(1 X 211 F1L1ER3
SAMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
It. 1)11 (
» . 0 )
-------
TABLE F 8A. TioT 7-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE MO.CH* 5*
ENGINF MODEL 7q CHEV *5*
ENGINE 7.* L(*5* CIO) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 751.t)H MM HG(21.5? IN HG)
DRY BULH TE"P. 27.8 DEG C(82.C DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
OESCRIfTION
BLOWER OIF P MM# H20(IN. HgO)
BLOWER IHLET P MM. H?U(IN. H20)
BLOWF.R INLET iEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONOS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CU, METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RAUGE/PPM
HC HCKGRD HETF.H/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE MF. UR/KANGE/PPM
CO RCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE ME 1E.R/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGR0 MEIfR/KANGE/PCr
*1 NOX SAMPLE >1E IER/RANGE/PPM
^5 NOX ttCKGttl) 1ETER/RANGF./PPM
to
DILUTION FACTUR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO COMCF.NTRA1ION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CU? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KM HH (G/HP Hk)
HSCO G/KM HR CG/HP HR)
R8C02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KK Hk (G/Hp UK)
BSFC KG/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 HAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
PSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/K« HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
1.8b ( 13.23)
b.21 ( *.b3)
80.13 ( 51,75)
1070 ( 718)
1,2* ( b.BI)
,383 ( .b30)
CJLD TRANSIENT PROJECT NO, ll-50**-0lll
TEST NO. 7"? RUM
DATE 1/31/71
TIKE 08:*b GASOLINE tM-?b?-F
DYNU NO. 2 BAG CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY IS PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3.5 GM/KG( 2*,8 GrAINS/LB) NqX HUMIDITY C.F. .8011
1 2 3 *
NYNF LAKF LAF NYNF
blb.U (27.*) 711.2 (28.0) 7b2.0 (30.0) 708,7 (27,1)
*57.2 (IB.U) *72.* (18.b) 5*1.0 (21,iJ *b*,8 (18.3)
5*.* (13(1,0) 5*.* (130,0) 5*.* (130.0) St.* (13tt.ii)
71*3 8uei 8311 71bH
271,1 307.0 31b,0 672,0
18*.1 ( b 5III) 208.1 ( 7350) 212.* ( 7SU1) 18*,* ( b5l*)
25.(1/ 3/ 250 11.0/ 3/ HO 8.0/ 3/ 8o *.2/ 3/ *2
.3/ 3/ 3 .•>/ 3/ b ,b/ 3/ b ,7/ 3/ 7
28,2/ 3/ 83* 31,0/ 3/ lib *l,b/ 3/ 122b 21,1/ 3/ b27
,b/ 3/ 18 1.*/ 3/ *3 1.1/ 3/ 3* 1,5/ 3/ *b
22,8/ 3/ .37 *0.0/ 3/ ,b8 82,7/ 3/ 1.S2 23,£/ 3/ .38
2.6/ 3/ ,0* ?.<~/ 3/ ,01 I,?/ 3/ ,113 2.3/ 3/ .lit
1.*/ 2/ 1 5b.3/ 2/ Sb b5.5/ 3/ lib 7.*/ 3/ ??
.1/ 2/ 0 .1/ 2/ 0 .3/ 3/ 1 .*/ 3/ 1
28,111 17. OS 8,1* 3(1,17
2*7 18* 75 35
BOb 851 115* 575
,33 .b* 1,50 .3*
1.3 5b,g 115.7 21.0
2b,23
22,13
1.1b
3.75
172.87
2(181 ?H
285,52
123.57
1121.h
2**1,1
5823,3
1lb2 . 0
2,bS
18.10
b* , 33
b.Ol
,*b5
(
1.113)
• B17
(
1.18)
1,18b
(
*.3B)
.*31
(
.15)
• SO
(
. b 7 )
2.0*
(
2.73)
b.bO
(
8.85)
.72
(
.17)
52, lb
(
38.10)
10. 85
(
8.01)
1,31
I
1.03)
5,11
(
3.87)
3*3.73
(
25b.32)
102.12
(
7b.15)
*3,28
I
32.27)
171,Ub
(
127.5b)
2230.21
(lf.b3.ftb)
1201.03
(
815.bl)
882,b5
I
b5R.20)
lbQB,52
(1111.*7)
5.27
(
3.13)
8.88
(
b. b2)
^.75
i
7.27)
B, 31
(
b.20)
.125
(
I .521)
.**0
(
.723)
.301
1
.*15)
.517
(
.181)
particulate oaia, total for * bags
iomh filter
SAMPLE FLOw - SCM(SCF) 0,000 C O.OO)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/TEST 0,000
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 0,0000 (O.IIOOU)
MULTIPLIER FOR G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL) 0,001)0 (0,0000)
20 X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO" SCM(SCF) 11.00 ( O.U)
-------
TABIX F-8A (CONT'D). TEST 7-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU, ll-50**-0()l
ENGINE NU.CHHS*
ENGINE MODEL 71 CHEV *5*
ENGINE 7.* L(*5* CIO) V-B
CVS NO. 1
TEST Nil. 7-2
PATE l/.U/^l
TIME 01:25
DYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE tM_ab7_F
BAG CAR I NO. 2
BAROMETER 751.OB MM HG(21.57 IN HG)
DRY BULB TFKP. 2b,1 DEC C(71.0 PEG F)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 15 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3.2 G*/KG{ 22.3 GRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .R015
BAG RESULTS
PAG NUMHER
DESCRIPTION
HLOWER 1>IF P MM. H?0( IN. H2")
BLOWER INLET P MM. H«!0(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET IEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER revolutions
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STO. CO. MEIRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
blb.ll (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
5*.* (131.0)
? 1 b 7
272.U
18*.7 ( b523)
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
* 7 2.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8087
307.0
208.0 ( 73*8)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.U)
SH1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.U)
8311
31b,o
21?.* ( 75U1)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.1)
*b*,8 (18.3)
5*.* (130.U)
71b*
272.0
18*.* ( hSl*)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
78.*/ 2/
78
85.0/ 2/
85
bS.1/ 2/
bb
*7.5/ 2/
*8
HC BCKGRO METF.R/RANGE/PPM
*.1/ 2/
*
b.O/ 2/
b
7.2/ 2/
7
b.O/ 2/
b
CO SAMPLE MRTER/RANGE/PPM
23.5/ 3/
b17
2*.l/ 3/
715
*1.0/ 3/
12U8
20.0/ 3/
515
CO 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
1.1/ 3/
3*
,*/ 3/
12
.b/ 3/
18
.*/ 3/
12
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
2b.0/ 3/
.*3
31.1/ 3/
.b8
88.*/ 3/
l.b5
25.b/ 3/
.*2
CO? BCKGRD METEH/RANGE/PCT
2,0/ 3/
,03
2.3/ 3/
.OH
1 , b/ 3/
.02
1,7/ 3/
.03
NOX SAMPLE METfR/RANGE/PPM
8.*/ 3/
25
18.1/ 3/
5*
b*,1/ 3/
115
7.3/ 3/
22
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
.1/ 3/
0
.1/ 3/
0
.2/ 3/
1
.3/ 3/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
2b.b3
17.77
7.57
27,7*
HC ClJNCENTRA 1 ION PPM
7*
71
bO
*2
CO CONCf N TRA1 ION PPM
b5b
bin
11*8
575
CO? C0NCEN1RAIION PCT
.to
¦ b*
1 • t>3
• 31
NOX CONCENTRATION PPh
2* . 1
5* , 0
11*.2
21.0
HC MASS GRAMS
7.13
^.52
7.31
* . H *
CO MASS GRAMS
1*1.11*
lb 7.23
283.13
123.51
CO? MASS GRAMS
13*3.b
2**b.7
b323.3
1333.0
NOX MASS GRAMS
7,115
17.23
b3 . 23
5.15
FUEL KG (LB)
.501
(
1.11)
.8b*
(
1.10)
2.1*1
I
*.72)
.tab
(
1.07)
KW HR (MP HR)
.81
(
1.11)
2.05
(
2.75)
b . b2
(
8.88)
.81
(
1.20)
BSHC G/KW Hr (G/Hp HR)
8.1*
(
b.b7)
*.b5
(
3.*7)
1.10
I
.82)
*.18
(
3.71)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
151,01
(
118.57)
81.b5
(
hi). 88)
*2.81
i
31,18)
138.fe2
(
103.37)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
151* » 7b
(1121.5b)
lii*.sn
(
810.7*)
155.13
(
712.2*)
1*15.18
(111*.IS)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
7.15
(
5.13)
".*1
(
b . 2 7 )
1.55
(
7.12)
b.b7
(
*.17)
BSFC KG/K« HR (LB/HP Hr)
. 5h5
(
.121)
.*22
(
• b13 )
.323
t
.532)
. 5*S
(
.81b)
total test results * bags particulate oatap total for » bags
total kw hr (HP HH)
RSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO? G/KW HR (G/HP H«)
BSNOX G/KW HH (G/Hp HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LH/HP HR)
111.*5 ( l*.Ol)
2.71 ( 2.(18)
bfl.52 ( SI.(IS)
I01h ( 8I?)
8.15 ( b.b7)
.382 ( .b28)
10MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
211 X 2(1 FILTERS
SAMPLh FLOW
SCH(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FULL)
SCH(SCF)
0.000 ( 0,00)
O.UUO
11,00(10 ((J,0(100)
(I.IUIUO (U.UOOO)
O.OIJ ( u.o)
-------
TABLE'F-8B . TEST 7-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINF NO,CH*S*
ENGINE MODEL 71 CHfcV »S*
ENGINF 7,* L(*5* CID) V-8 |
CVS NO. q
BAROMETER 7*8.5* MM HG(21.*7 IN HG)
DRY HIIL6 ?CfIP. 27,2 DEG C(81.0 OEG F)
COLD TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 7-3 RON
DATE 2/ 1/71
TIME 08 ! *5
DYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY IS PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3.* Grt/KG( 23.8
PROJECT MU. ll-50H*-0lll
GASOLINE tM-?b7-F
HAG CAR I NU. 2
GrAInS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .8051
BAG RFSUL1S
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H2C1(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN, H?0)
BLOwER 1'iLET 1EMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOhER RF.VOLUl IONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FL"W STD. CU. MEIRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
blb.O (27.*)
*57.a (18.0)
5* . * (1311.(1)
7lb8
27?.n
18*.1 ( h 5 01)
2
LanF
711.2 (88.0)
*72,* (18.b)
5* .* (130.0)
8081
30'.0
£07.3 ( 7323)
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30,0)
5*1,0 (21.3)
SH, * (130.U)
8319
31b.0
211.b ( 7*7>t)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*fb*,8 (18.3)
9*.* (130.11)
71b5
272.0
183.8 ( b*12)
I
to
J*
HC
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
*1.*/
3/
f 1 f
18.5/
3/
185
7,b/
3/
7b
*5.8/
2/
*b
MC
BCKGKD
MET ER/RANGE/PPM
,b/
3/
b
1.1/
3/
11
,S/
3/
1
5,3/
2/
5
CO
SAMPLE
MF1ER/RANGE/PPM
32,3/
3/
15*
30.0/
3/
887
37,1/
3/
1117
11.2/
3/
571
CO
HCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
,8/
3/
?*
,5/
3/
15
,5/
3/
15
.V
3/
28
CO?
SAMPLE
MFtER/RANGF./PCT
2* , 1/
3/
,31
*1,2/
3/
.70
8S , 1/
3/
1.S1
2b.H/
3/
.*H
CO?
HCKGRD
METF-R/RANliE/pCT
3,5/
3/
• "5
2 , b/
3/
,0*
3,H/
3/
.05
2.B/
3/
.11*
NOX
SASPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
13,1/
2/
13
53,8/
2/
5*
b* , 7/
3/
11*
11.2/
2/
11
NOX
BCKGKD
METER/RANGE/PPM
,b/
2/
I
.5/
2/
1
.2/
3/
1
.»/
2/
n
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCfcNTRAlION PPM
CO? CONCEnIRaTION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
25.32
HOB
11 1
.3*
12.5
lb.bS
1.5
85b
.bb
53.3
7.8b
b8
10b*
1.55
113.4.
2b, b2
*1
537
,*0
18.8
HC MASS GRAMS
*3.3*
20.81
8,32
*.31
Co MASS GHAmS
lib,87
20b.71
2b2,31
115,05
CO? MASS GRAMS
1152,7
2513.U
5187,8
1350.2
NOX MASS GRAnS
3.55
1 ',05
b3, 15
5.33
FUEL KG (LH)
.50*
( 1.11)
.lib
(
2,02)
2.02b
I
*,*7)
.*87
I 1.07)
KW HR (HP HR)
• b2
( .83)
2,08
(
2,71)
b,b8
(
8.1b)
.«u
( 1.23)
BSHC G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
70.21
( 52.3b)
1U.0*
(
7 , *1)
1,2*
I
.¦»3)
*,72
( 3.52)
BSCO G/KW HR IG/HP HR)
318.1b
( 237.85)
11,37
(
\ 7*.10)
31,2*
I
21,2b)
125,82
( 13.82)
BSCU2 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
18b7,5b
(1312,bH)
1208.(13
(
100.83)
815,71
(
bb 7.11)
1* 7b,b 3
(1101,12)
HSNOX G/K*i HK (G/HP HR)
5. 7b
( *,21)
8,11
(
b,ll)
1.*5
I
7.05)
5.R3
( *.35)
HSFC KG/Kw HH (Lrt/HP HK)
.HI 7
( 1.3*3)
.**11
(
,723)
.313
I
• * 18 )
,533
( ,875)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS
-------
TABLE F-8B (CONT'D). TEST 7-3 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE NC).CH*5*
ENGINE MODEL 79 CHEV *5*
ENGINE 7.* L(-»5* CIO) V-B
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*B.5* MM HG(29.*7 IN HG)
DRY HULO TEMP. 25.b DEG C(78,0 PEG F)
MOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 7-3 RUN
DATE 2/ 1/79
TIME 09:2*
DYNO NO, 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 15 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3.1 GM/KGC 31.5
PROJECT NO. ll»5UHt-0lll
GASOLINE tM-ab?-F
BAG CAR1 NO. 2
GRAINS/LB} NOX HUMIDITY C.F. ,799J
BAG RESULTS
HAG NIJN«FR
OhSC«IHTION
HLOWtR OIF P MM. HBO(IN. HJO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
HLOKER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(0EG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONOS
TOTAL Flow STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
b9b.0 (27.*)
*57.2 (18.0)
S*.* (13n.n)
71bB
272.0
18*.1 ( b501)
2
Lanf
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
Hfl89
30?.0
207.3 ( 7323)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.0)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5H.¥ (130.0)
8320
31b. 0
211.b ( 7*75)
*
NYNF
708.7 (27.9)
*b*.8 (IB.3)
5*.* (130.(1)
71bb
272.0
183.8 ( b*93)
*1
I
to
<_n
HC SAhPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD HE fER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE ME TER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD ME TER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? HCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
dilution factor
HC CONCENTRAI ION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
cne concentration pct
NOX concentration PPM
83.1/ 2/
b.0/ 2/
2*.S/ 3/
.b/ 3/
2*,9/ 3/
3.0/ 3/
20.b/ 2/
.5/ 2/
87,"f1
77
b99
,3b
2n. L
R3
b
72b
18
.*~1
."5
21
1
80.*/ 2/
7.0/ 2/
25.2/ 3/
.*/ 3/
39.8/ 3/
3.1/ 3/
*b.O/ 2/
»b/ 2/
17.75
7»
722
• b3
f S.H
80
7
7*7
12
,b7
,05
*b
1
b*,2/ 2/
b*
*8.*/
2/
*8
b,8/ 2/
7
7.3/
2/
7
3b.7/ 3/
1U82
20.*/
3/
bU7
1.0/ 3/
31
l.B/
3/
37
8* , 8/ 3/
1.57
27.5/
3/
.*5
3.3/ 3/
.05
3.5/
3/
.05
bb,*/ '3/
isq
18. 9/
2/
19
,3/ 3/
l
.5/
2/
l
7,SS
58
1018
1.52
flB,*
25,89
*1
5b3
.*0
18.*
HC MASS grams
8.21
8.83
7.11
* , 39
CO MASS GRAMS
1*9,91
17*.30
250,8*
120,58
C02 MASS GRAMS
122*,1
2387.3
5818.5
1350.9
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.bb
i*.*n
b*.19
5.18
FuFL KG (LB)
.*b8
(
1.03)
.8*8 (
1.87)
1,991
* . 39)
.*90 (
l.ns)
KW HR (HP HR)
.92
(
1.23)
2.U (
2.83)
b . 71
9.00)
.92 (
1.23)
85MC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
S.93
(
b.bb)
*.18 (
3.12)
1,0b
.79)
*.77 (
3.5b)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
lb3.13
(
121.bS)
82.52 (
bl.53)
37.37
27,87)
131.21 (
*7.85)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1332,11b
(
993.32)
1130.22 (
8*2,81)
878,83
b5S.35)
1*70.03 (1119b , 20)
8SN0X t/KK HR (G/HP HR)
b. lb
(
*.59)
b. 82 (
5.08)
9.5b
7.13)
S.b3 (
*.20)
HSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.5111
(
.838)
.*01 (
. bbfl)
.217
.*88)
.533 (
.877)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS » BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP MR)
fiSCO G/KW tIR (G/HP HR)
RSC02 G/KW H* (G/HP HR)
H3N0X G/Kw HR (G/HP HR)
II),bb ( 1*,30)
2.bfl C a.no)
bS.2* ( *8.b5)
101«* ( 7bl))
8.39 ( h.25)
HSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR) ,3Sb ( .585)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
2(1 X 211 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO"
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/L8 FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
O.UOO I U.OU)
n.uoo
ii.nono (u.oooa)
o.oonn (u.uono)
•i.ou ( o,p)
-------
TABLE F-9A. TEST 8-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLO TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU. 11-5044-0IU
ENGINE Nu.lHtnn
Engine model 71 ih tnt
ENGINF b.b LftOH CID) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 7*7.55 Mm HG(29.43 IN HG)
on* BIILR 1EMP. 24,4 OEG C(7b.n UEG F)
TEST NO. 8-4 RUN
DATE a/lb/79
TIME nq:54
DYNO NO. a
GASOLINE tM-2b7-F
HAG CART NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 18 PCT
ABSOLUTE HIJMIOITY 3.5 CVKGC 2*,5 GRAJNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. •8082
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H 2 0 ( IN , H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H?OCIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEmP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOmER REVUL'MIONS
TIKE SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. METRES(SCF)
1
NYNF
blb.O (27.4)
457.2 (18,11)
54.4 (lan.o)
71b?
272.11
18 3,8 ( b491)
2
LANF
711,2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
54, 4 (130,0)
808b
307,1)
207.0 ( 7310)
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30.0)
541.0 (21.3)
54.4 (13D.0)
831*
31b, 0
211.2 ( 7151)
H
NYNF
708.7 (27, 9)
HbH,8 (18,3)
54.4 (130.fl)
71b3
272.U
183.5 ( b481)
I
to
CT>
HC
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
58.U/
3/
5811
50.0/
3/
500
25.0/
3/
250
4b.b/
2/
*7
HC
BCKGRD
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
1,0/
3/
1 0
1,0/
3/
10
1.1/
3/
11
10.2/
2/
11)
CU
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
4b.[)/
3/
1355
51.8/
3/
1525
5b,a/
3/
lbSS
12.V
3/
372
CU
HCKGHD
METER/RANUE/PPM
.3/
3/
9
.1/
3/
3
.1/
3/
3
1 .2/
3/
37
CU?
SAMPLE
meter/range/pct
23,0/
3/
.37
3*. 5/
3/
.58
78.2/
3/
l."»2
21 .3/
3/
.35
CO?
HCKGRO
ME1ER/RANGE/PCT
3.3/
3/
.05
3.5/
3/
.05
3 , b/
3/
.Ufa
*,0/
3/
.lib
NOX
SAMPLE
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
8 , b/
2/
9
24,8/
2/
25
U,2/
3/
12*
IT,*/
2/
It
NOX
HCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPH
.5/
2/
1
.8/
2/
i
1.5/
a/
a
l.b/
2/
2
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
c<>2 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
23.b7
5 70
1328
.33
8. t
1?.2*
"~11
1*17
.53
2*,0
8,33
24-0
1597
1.37
122.3
3* . bb
37
332
.ai
12. b
HC MASS GRAMS
bO.Hb
58. 5b
29. a?
3.88
CO MASS GRAMS
284.25
3b0.b1
312.78
70.81
CU? MASS GRAMS
1017. 4-
lHb.7
531b.1
151,7
NOX MASS GRAMS
a.3i
7.K9
31,92
3.59
FUEL KG (LH)
.547
(
1.21)
. 8b7
(
1,11)
1,100
I
4.11)
.342
(
.75)
KW HR (HP HH)
.77
(
1.04)
i.7a
(
2.30)
5.43
(
?.28)
,7S
(
l.'U)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
78,31
(
58.40)
3H.ll
c
25,44)
5,31
t
*.U2)
5.15
(
3,84)
BSCO G/Kh HR (G/HP HH)
3b8.17
(
274.55)
210.11
(
15b.bB)
72.38
(
53.97)
14,U3
(
70.12)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
1421.39
(J051.13)
11 b 3.13
(
8b7.35)
179.58
I
730.47)
1273.(15
(
141.31)
BSNOX U/KH HH (G/HP HR)
a.H
(
a.23)
4.48
(
3.34)
7.3b
(
5.41)
*.7b
(
3.55)
HSFC KG/K.W HR (LB/HP HR)
,7111
(
l.lbS)
.505
(
.830)
.350
(
.575)
0 . 4 S 3
(
• 74 S )
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
PART ICIJLAT E UA T Ar TOTAL FOR 4 BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HR)
8SHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
PSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HK)
HSt'O? G/KW Hrt (G/HP HH)
(ISMIJX G/KW HK (G/HP HH)
B,b7 ( ll.t.3)
17.55 ( 13,II"*)
127.B7 ( 15.3b)
1U81 (
b.i? (
nob)
*.«>U)
BSFC KG/R* HH (LB/HP HR) .*22 ( ,b93)
91IMM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER Fur
MULTIPLIER FOR
r»0 X 20 FILTERS
SAHPIE FLO"'
SCM(SCF)
g/test
G/Kw HR (G/Hp HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0.000 I 0.00)
0. 000
o.oono (ti.riouo)
ii.uooo (o.oonn)
'l.OII ( o.u)
-------
TABLE F-9A (CONT'D), TEST 8-4 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, ll-SOII-Oill
ENGINE NO.IHIfll
ENGINE MUDEL 71 IH 1IJ1
ENGINE b.b L(101 CID) V-8
CVS NO, i
BAROMETER 7»7.52 *M HG(21.13 IN HG)
DRV BULH TEMP. 21.1 DIG C(7h.ll DE& F)
TEST NO. B-1
DATE 2/lb/71
TIME I ll t 31
DYNO NO. 2
RUN
GASOLINE trt-2b7-F
HAl» CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 18 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3,5 GM/«G( St.* GRAINS/L8)
NOX HUMIOITY C.F, ,8077
I
NJ
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
description
BLOHER DIF P MM# H?0(IN, H2U)
HLONER I»LET P MM. H20(IN, H2P)
BLOWER IfiLET TEmP. OEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* STO, CU. METRES(SCF)
hc sample meter/Range/ppm
HC BCkGKD meter/range/ppm
CO SAMPLE METER/RAMGE/PPM
CO HCKGKO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO MEtER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTKAlION PPM
CO CONCENTRAIION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
1
NYNF
blb.O (27,1)
*57,2 (18,0)
51.1 (1311,0)
71b5
272, II
183.7 ( b181)
7,5/ 3/
.1/ 3/
22,3/ 3/
,1/ 3/
21,1/ 3/
3.*/ 3/
12.1/ 2/
,5/ 2/
31,28
bb
hi?
.31
11,b
75
1
bt>2
12
,3b
."5
12
1
2
lanf
711,2 (28,0)
172.* (18.b)
51.1 ( 130.0)
808b
307. n
207.0 ( 7310)
8.5/ 3/
1.0/ 3/
23.B/ 3/
1.3/ 3/
31.8/ 3/
3.7/ 3/
30.2/ 2/
.5/ 2/
20.28
75
b5b
,53
85
in
70b
10
,58
,0b
30
1 "
3
laf
7b2,0 (30,UJ
511,0 (21.3)
51.1 (130.0)
11311
31b.0
8,b7
15
Sb2
1,3b
13b.2
1
NYNF
70 B,7 (27.9)
Ibl,8 (IB,3)
51,1 (130,0)
71b3
272,0
211.2
(
7159)
183.5
(
bIBl)
5,1/
3/
51
17,0/
2/
17
1,0/
3/
10
5,1/
2/
5
3b,1/
3/
lUbS
12.1/
3/
387
2,5/
3/
7b
1, b/
3/
19
78,1/
3/
1.11
21,1/
3/
.31
5,1/
3/
,08
3,1/
3/
,05
15.5/
3/
13b
13,1/
2/
11
.1/
3/
0
,5/
2/
1
31,83
12
335
.a*
13,1
HC MASS GRAMS
7,112
1.01
5,50
1.15
CO MASS GRAMS
137,32
158.17
23b,51
71,11
COP "IASS GRAMS
102b,5
201H.2
527b,1
178.b
NOX MASS GRAMS
3,30
-------
TABLE F-9B. TEST 8-5 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU, il-5im-tj
33.57
3,HO
FUFL KG (LB)
.HBH ( 1.118)
* H 3b
( l.BH)
1 ,8bB
I
H . 12 )
, 3H0
(
.75)
KW HR (HP HR)
.b9 ( .93)
l.hB
C 2.2b)
5.28
I
7.nB)
.?H
(
.99)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
5b.28 ( HI.9b)
2?.83
C ?0.75)
5.22
I
3.89)
5.93
(
H.H2)
BSCU G/KW HR (G/HP HK)
327,71 ( 2HH.3B)
188.58
( 1H r), b 3 )
7H.S1
I 55.5b)
92.93
< b9.30)
BSC02 G/KK HM (G/HP HR)
1SHB.9|| (1155.02)
1188.89
( 8Bb.5b)
989.30
I 737.72)
1299.h9
( 9b9,18)
tlSNOK (i/KH HH (G/HP hR)
P.BIJ ( 2. OH)
*.33
( 3.23)
b, 3b
I
».7H)
H.b2
(
3 « * 5 )
BSFC KB/KK HR (LB/HP HR)
. 7ri 7 ( 1,1b2)
,49b
( .815)
• 35H
(
.582)
,Hb2
(
.759)
TOTAL TEST RTSULTS H OARS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL
FOR H BAGS
TOTAL K* HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/K« hR (G/HP HP)
BSCtl G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
RSC02 G/K* HR (G/HP HH)
hSNtl* G/K* MR (G/HP HH)
BSFC KG/KW HP (LB/HP HH J
8.31 ( JJ.25)
l^.na ( lu.Hb)
119.BR { 89.39)
J 1(13 ( 822)
5.51 ( *.11)
,H?1 ( .bl?)
9I1MM FILTER
SAMPLE FLOW
multiplied for
multiplier for
MULTIPLIED FOR
?() X ?li FILTERS
sample FLO"
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/Kw HR (G/HP HW)
G/KG FUEL (G/LH FUtL )
SCH(SCF)
(i.niio i o.oo)
ii.noo
n.onnn (u.riunu)
M.(10(10 (U.00(10)
n.no ( n.u)
-------
TABLE F-9B (CONT'D). TEST 8-5 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO. il-5U*»*-0(ll
ENGINE NO.IH*09
Engine mouel 79 ih »«¦»
ENGINE b.b L("H)1 CID) V-B
CVS NO. «1
barometer 7»i.93 mm hg(29.2i in HG)
DRV BULB TEMP. 2S.il DEG C(77.0 OEG F)
TEST NO. 8-S RUN
DATE 2/21/79
TIME sH5
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE tM-Bh7-F
BAG CARI NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 27 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 5.* G"VKG( 37.8 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .85X3
BAG RESULI3
HAG NUMBER
desckiption
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
blower inlet ifmp. deg. c(deg. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLO* STU. CU. METWES(SCF)
1
NYNF
fe<*b.n (27.*)
157.2 (18.11)
S*."» (130.0)
7 lt>3
272.0
182.2 ( b*3b)
2
LANF
711.2 (28.0)
*72.* (18.b)
5*.* (130.0)
8083
30?.0
205.3 ( 7250)
3
LAF
7b2.0 (30.U)
5*1.0 (21.3)
5*.* (130.0)
8313
31b.0
209,5 ( 7399)
H
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
*b*.B (18.3)
5*.* (130.0)
71bl
272.0
182.0 ( b* 28 )
*1
I
to
vo
HC
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
9.8/
3/
98
9.5/
3/
95
fe.7/
3/
b 7
b2.*/
2/
b2
HC
BCKGRD
MEUr/RAnGE/PPM
1.1/
3/
11
1.1/
3/
11
I,*/
3/
11
12.U/
2/
12
CO
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PPM
18.8/
3/
SbO
20.0/
3/
595
38.0/
3/
1120
l*.i/
3/
*22
CO
BCKGRO
MEIER/RANGE/PPM
.5/
3/
15
.*/
3/
12
.7/
3/
21
1.5/
3/
Hfe
CO?
SAMPLE
METER/RANGE/PCT
19.7/
3/
.32
33.7/
3/
.5b
77,8/
3/
i.*i
20.3/
3/
.33
C02
BCKGKD
METER/RANGE/PCT
2.8/
3/
,0*
2.?/
3/
.0*
2.8/
3/
,U*
2.!»/
3/
.0*
NOX
SAMPLE
METER/RANGF/PPM
*.5/
2/
10
2b.8/
2/
27
*0.0/
3/
120
11.2/
2/
11
NOX
BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
.3/
2/
0
.*/
2/
0
.5/
2/
1
.*/
2/
II
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO C0NCENTRA1ION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRAlION PPM
35.00
87
537
.28
9,?
21.2*
85
572
.52
2«>.*
8.7b
55
lObl
1.38
119,b
35,h*
51
371
.21
1(1,8
HC MAS3 GRAMS
9.18
10.01
b.bO
5,33
CO MASS GRAMS
113.89
13b.bS
258.87
78.72
COP MASS GRAMS
922.2
19b8.3
5281.b
970.0
NOX MASS GRAMS
2.73
8.83
*0.78
3,20
FUEL KG (L8)
.35b
(
.71)
• ti9R
(
1,51)
1,800
I
3.97)
.350
(
.7?)
KW HR (HP HR)
.72
(
.9b)
l.h*
(
2.20)
5 ,28
I
7.08)
,73
(
,9B)
RSMC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1?. 79
(
9.5H)
b . 09
(
*.S»)
1.25
I
.93)
7,28
(
5,*3)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP MR)
158.73
(
118.3b)
83.12
(
f.1.98)
(.
3b.58)
107,t.7
(
80,29)
HSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1285.17
(
958.35)
1197.20
(
892.81)
11100.85
(
7tb.3H)
132b,71
(
989,33)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
3.81
(
2.8"»)
5.37
(
*,01)
7.73
I
5.7b)
*,38
(
3,27)
BSFC KG/Kw HK (LB/HP HR)
.*97
(
.81b)
.425
(
.b98)
.3*1
I
.51.1)
.*79
(
,787)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS * BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FOR * BAGS
TOTAL Krf MR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
BSCU2 G/KW MR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
HSFC KG/KW HH (LB/HP HR) .383 ( ,b?9)
8.37 ( 11.22)
3.72 ( 2.77)
70.27 ( 52,*0)
10*12 ( HI 5)
fc.fe* ( *.95)
90HM FILTER
sample flow
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
?n X 211 FILTERS
sample flo1*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
0.(11)0 I O.UU)
o.oun
ii.nouo (u.untiii)
n.noou (o.nuoo)
n.no ( (j.n)
-------
TABLE F-10A, TEST 10-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.GM292
ENGINE MO0EL -0 GM 29?
ENGINE 1,8 L(292 CIl)) V-8
CVS NO. 9
BAROMFTER 7*1.13 MM HG(29.19 IN HU)
DRY BUUH TF.Hp, g7,B DEG C(B2,0 DEG F)
COLD TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 10-1 RUN
DATE 1/20/79
TIME urn
DYNO NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bU PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11,5 GM/KGtlDl.1
PROJECT NU, U-5011-0U1
GASOLINE tH-2b7-F
BAG CAR1 NO. 2
GRAlNS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F. 1,1115
LJ
o
BAG RESULT3
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER I)IF P MM. H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. h2U(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TfcMP. DEG. C(0EG. F)
BLOWER REVULU11ONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RAnGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/HANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRD METEN/RANGE/PCT
1 *IOX SAMPLE METER/KANGE/PPM
NOX fiCKGUP MEtER/RANGF/PPM
DILUTIUN FACTOR
HC CONCENT RA1 I OH PPM
CO CONCENIRAI ION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
1
NYNF
btb.ll (27.1)
157,2 (18.0)
51.1 (1311.0)
71b1
270.11
182.1 £ b132)
13,2/ 3/ 132
1.5/ 3/ 15
1*1.7/ 3/ 1*M
1,0/ 3/ 31
11,3/ 3/ ,23
2,B/ 3/ ,01
lfl.0/ 2/ in
,2/2/ 0
32,12
117
14 1)0
. 1 *•
9,B
2
LANF
711,2 (2B.0)
172.1 (lB.b)
51,1 (130,0)
8081
30 7.0
205,1 ( 7215)
11.V 3/ 119
1,5/ 3/ 15
21.fc/ 3/ (>12
,8/ 3/ 21
23,7/ 3/ ,31
2,9/ 3/ ,01
5U,2/ 2/ 50
,1/ 2/ 0
29,07
105
bOl
.31
50,1
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30.U)
511.0 (21.3)
51,1 (130.U)
831b
31b. 0
209.1 ( 73Hb)
7,9/ 3/ 79
1,1/ 3/ 11
1b,0/ 3/ 1355
1,3/ 3/ HO
51,1/ 3/ ,95
3,1/ 3/ .US
59,7/ 3/ 179
,1/ 3/ 0
12.35
hb
12bB
.SO
178,B
1
NYNF
708.7 (27,9)
Ibl.8 (18,3)
51,1 (130,0)
71H1
272,0
181.9 ( b123)
B,1/ 3/ 81
l.V 3/ 11
10,0/ 3/ 301
1,5/ 3/ lb
15,1/ 3/ ,21
3,1/ 3/ ,05
21,1/ 2/ 21
,1/ 2/ 0
18.20
b 7
251)
.H
21,11
HC MASS GRAMS
13,R5
12,37
7,99
7,0b
CO HASS GRAMS
29b,80
113.bl
309,IB
52.8b
COS MASS GRAMS
b I 9 , 1
IS^l.l
311b.0
bib.3
NOX MASS GRAMS
3,911
22,11
81.77
9.53
FUEL KG (LB)
,38b
(
,B5)
,191
(
1.08)
1.217
I
2.75)
.237
(
.52)
KW HR (HP HR)
. bl
(
.Bb)
1,23
(
l.bl)
3.71
I
5.U1)
.52
(
.70)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
b8, 77
(
51.2H)
IU.OB
(
7.52)
2.11
I
1.59)
13.1b
(
10.01)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HK)
1b5,17
(
317.10)
117,12
(
87.33)
82, b9
I
bl.bb)
100,79
(
75,1b)
HSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HH)
971,12
(
721.39)
1053,15
(
7B5.33)
921.bl
I
bB7,25)
1232.2b
(
918,90)
BSNOX G/Krt HH (G/HP HH)
b, 12
(
1.5b)
18,30
(
13.b5)
21.87
I
lb,31)
18.18
(
13,5b)
BSFC KG/KK HK (LB/HP HR)
, b1B)
,152
(
.713)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS « BAGS
PARTICULATE DATA, TOTAL FUR 1 BAGS
TOTAL KM HR (HP HR)
BSHC G/KK HK (G/HP HH)
BSCO G/K* HK (G/HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HK (G/HP HR)
8SN0X G/KW HH (G/HP HK)
b.13 ( ft.22)
11,b3 ( B,h7)
130.9b ( 97,bb)
980 ( 731)
19,20 ( 11,32)
BSFC KG/KW HK (LB/HP HR) ,3B5 ( ,b31)
90MM FILTER
SAMPLE flow
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIED FOR
2fl X 20 FILTERS
SAMPLE FLU*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/Kli FUEL (G/LB FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
U.UOO ( 0,00)
o.non
u.oann (u.onou)
ii.oumi (u.ooqu)
it, un (
n.o)
-------
TABLE F-10A (CONT'D). TEST 10-1 EMISSIONS RESULTS
ENGINE N0.GM212
ENGINF MODEL -U GM 212
ENGINE *.8 L(21? CID) V-8
CVS NO, 1
BAROMETER 7*1.*3 mm HG(21.H IN HG)
Our HllLB TEMp. 30.b DEG C(B7.0 DEG F)
HOT TRANSIENT
TEST NO. 10-1 RUN
DATE */20/71
TIME
DYNl) NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY *b PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 12.1 GM/KG( 10.b
PROJECT NO. 1]-50**-001
GASOLINE tM-2h7-F
BAG CAR I NU. 5
GrAInS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0711)
BAG RESULTS
U>
BAG
number
1
2
3
*
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
Lanf
LAF
NYNF
BLOHER DIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?l>)
bib.n
(27.*)
711.2 (28.
0)
7b2.n (30
.u;
708.7
(27,
1)
blower ihlet p mm. h2u(in. h2o)
*57.8
(1B.0)
*72.* (18.
b)
5*1.0 (21
.3)
* b* . 8
(1«.
3)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
5*.*
(1311,0)
5*.* (130
.0)
5*,* (130.U)
5*.*
(130
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
7lb3
8UBH
8318
71b3
TIME SECONDS
272
30 ? . U
315.1
272.U
TOTAL FLOW STO. CO. METRES(SCF)
182.1
( b*31)
205.1 ( 72*5)
201.5 (
7318)
181.1
( b*25)
HC
SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
1* .8/
3/ **B
l.fe/ 3/
lb
7.3/ 3/
73
7.7/
3/
77
HC
BCKGRD MEIER/RAHGE/PPM
1.1/
3/ 11
1. * / 3/
1*
1.2/ 3/
12
1.1/
3/
11
CO
SAMPLE ME1EH/RAN0E/PPM
*3.h/
3/ 128*
18.3/ 3/
545
*5.5/ 3/
13*0
10.7/
3/
3?2
CO
bCKGHD METER/RANGE/PPM
.7/
3/ 21
.5/ 3/
15
.1/ 3/
28
l.«»/
3/
41
CO?
SAMPLE ME 1 EH/RANGE/PCT
1*.*/
3/ .23
23.1/ 3/
.31
55.*/ 3/
.1?
1* . B/
3/
.2*
co?
BCKGRD METtH/HANGE/PCT
2.5/
3/ .11*
2.1/ 3/
.0*
2.b/ 3/
.0*
3.0/
3/
.05
NOX
SAMPLE ME TEH/RANGE/PPM
1.3/
2/ 1
53.0/ 2/
53
b3.7/ 3/
Hi
2*.b/
2/
25
NOX
BCKGRD MEIER/RANGE/PPM
.2/
2/ 0
.3/ 2/
0
.3/ 3/
1
.*/
2/
u
DILUTION FACTOR
33
.53
21.58
12.15
*8.77
HC
CONCENTRATION PPM
H 37
82
b2
bb
CO
CONCENTRATION PPM
1231
518
1270
2b8
CO?
CONCENTRATION PCT
.
IS
.35
.13
.11
NOX
CONCENTRATION PPM
i
.1
52.7
110.3
2*.2
HC MASS GRAMS
*5.13
1.7b
7 , *1
b , 15
CO MASS GRAMS
2b2,73
123.83
301.8b
5b.81
CO? MASS GRAMS
b 31. 7
1332.3
35b*.1
b3*.8
NOX MASS GRAMS
3.*2
22.32
82.2b
1.01
FUEL KG (LB)
.378
C
.B3)
.*11
(
1.08)
1.285
I
2.83)
.235
(
.52)
KM HR (HP HR)
,b8
(
.11)
1.23
(
l.b5)
3,7b
i
5.OH)
.5*
(
.72)
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
b7,b3
(
50.*3)
7.11
(
5.10)
1,11
I
l.*1)
12.17
C
1.b7)
BSCO G/KW Hr (G/Hp HR)
38b.8b
(
288.*8)
100.37
(
7*.85)
82. *5
I
b 1. * 1)
1 lib , 0*
(
71.08)
BSC02 G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
1*1 .11
(
702.38)
1071.88
(
805.2b)
1*8,*2
I
707.2H)
118*.11
C
883,58)
HSNOX G/KW HH (G/HP HH)
5.(1*
(
3. ?(.)
1». 01
(
13.*1)
21.81
(
lb.32)
lb.lb
(
12.b5)
HSFC KG/KW HR (LH/HP HR)
.55b
(
.11*)
.318
(
• b5* )
.3*2
I
.5b?)
.*31
(
.722)
TOTAL Ttar RESULTS * BAGS PAKTJCllLATf DATA, Tt'TAL FOR * HAB8
TOTAL KW HR (HP HlO
BSHC G/KW HH (G/Hp MR)
BSCO G/KW HK (G/HP HH)
BSC02 G/KW Hh CG/HP HH)
HSNOX G/KW HH (G/HP HH)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
b.21 ( R.32)
11.30 (
121.3b (
11* (
8.*3)
111. SO)
7*1)
IB.8b ( 1*.«7)
.385 ( .b33)
•MWM FILTER
SAMPLE FLUW
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
MULTIPLIER FOR
20 X en FILTERS
SAMPLE FLO*
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KM HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/LH FUtL)
SCMISCF)
o.ooo i o.un)
I). OHO
u.noon (ij.oouo)
u.nuoo (o.uuuu)
(I.UO ( o.n)
-------
TABLE F-10B. TEST 10-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
COLD TRANSIENT
PROJECT NU. 11-50HH-001
ENGINE
engine
N0.GM292
MODEL
11 GM 292
TEST NO. in-?
DATE H/23/79
RUN
4
I
u>
to
ENGINE H.8 L(29? CID) V-fl
TIME 119 112
GASOLINE
tM-at7-F
CVS NO. 9
DYNO NO
2
BAG CAR 1
NO
. 2
BAROMFlER 7HI.H3 mm hiHe9.lt IN Hli)
RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
»2 PCT
DRY BULB Tr.MP. 27.B DEG C(H2.0 OEG F)
ABSOLUTE
HUMIDITY
IU.IJ gm/kg(
b9
,9 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY c.k
. 9?b8
BAG RFSULTS
HAG NUMBFK
1
2
3
H
description
NYNF
LanF
LAF
NYNF
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
btb.O (?7,
H)
711,2 (28.
0)
7b2,U (30
,UJ
708,7 (27.
9)
ttLONEft INLET P MM, H20(IN. H20)
•~57.2 (IB.
0)
H72. H (18.
b)
5H1.0 (21
.3)
HbH,8 (18,
3)
blower inlet temp. oeg. c(deg, F)
5H.H (1311
.0)
5H.H (13U
.0)
5H.H (130,
U)
5H.H (130
,11)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
7lb7
808b
8318
71b3
TIME SECONDS
27?. t)
30 7, i)
31b,0
272,0
TOTAL FLOK STO. CO. MFTRES(SCF)
1R2.2 ( hH35)
205,2 ( 72*7)
209,5 (
7398)
181,9 ( bH 25 )
HC SAMPLE ME 1ER/RANGE/PPM
b7,b/ 3/
b7b
1b.1/ 3/
lbl
10.2/ 3/
1U2
11,0/ 3/
11"
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
2.1/ 3/
21
2.2/ 3/
22
1.9/ 3/
19
1.5/ 3/
15
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
57.H/ 3/ lb9o
20.9/ 3/
b21
H 3,3/ 3/
i «e ? b
10.H/ 3/
325
CO BCKGRO METfcR/RANGE/PPM
.8/ 3/
24
.7/ 3/
21
1.1/ 3/
3H
2,U/ 3/
bl
CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
lb.n/ 3/
,2h
25,0/ 3/
.HI
5b,3/ 3/
•
98
15.1/ 3/
.25
CO? tSCKGPD METER/RANGE/PCT
H.O/ 3/
, Ub
3.8/ 3/
.lib
3.8/ 3/
•
0b
3,9/ 3/
,0b
NOX SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PPM
10.b/ 2/
11
H7.7/ 2/
H 8
b0.2/ 3/
1«1
23,5/ 2/
23
NOX 6CKGR0 METER/RANGE/PPM
.3/ ?/
D
.H/ 2/
0
,3/ 3/
1
,9/ 2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
27."to
27,57
12,00
HS.lb
HC CONCENTRATION PP*
b5b
lHO
85
95
CO CONCEMTWA1 ION PPM
1Mb
588
120H
2 bll
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
.20
.35
.93
.20
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
10.3
*7.3
179,8
22. b
HC MASS GRAMS
bfi.1I
lb.5*
10,22
10.110
CO MASS GWAmS
3H7.05
1 411. 3 B
293,bO
55.02
CO? MASS GRAMS
bS5. 1
132b.3
3Sb5 , 2
bSO.b
NOX MASS GRAMS
3.51
18.1*
7U,3b
7 . b9
FUEL KG (LB)
.«»«~ 7
( . 99 )
.SO*
(
1.11)
1.280
I
2,82)
.2*2
( ,53)
KW HH (HP HR)
.71
( .9b)
1.2*
(
l.bb)
3. 78
i
S.llb)
. 5H
( ,73)
B3HC G/KH HR IG/HP HH)
9b,b3
( 72.0b)
13.37
(
9.97)
2.71
i
2.02)
IB,HI
( 13,73)
BSCO G/KW HH (G/HP HR)
tSh.t!)
{ 3b2.91)
113,HH
(
RH.59)
77.7H
c
57,9?)
101,2b
( 75,51)
BSCO? G/KW HH (G/HP hR)
91 8 . b I)
( bB5 . Oil )
lU?l.b8
( 799,15)
9H3.97
l
703,92)
1197,55
( 893,01)
BSNOX G/Khi HW (G/HP HH)
h.9?
( 3.b7)
lH.bb
(
10.93)
18.h3
I
13,89)
1H.15
( 10.55)
BSFC KG/Kmi HH (LB/HP HH)
. h2 7
( 1,U31)
• HO 7
(
• b 7 U )
,339
I
.557)
. H H b
( .733)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS W
MULTIPLIER FOH
20 X 21) FILTERS
SAMI'LE FLlH
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
G/KG FUEL (G/LH FUtL)
SCM(3CF)
o.oou ( u.uo)
n.oou
u.ooiio (u.nunn)
ti.nunn (u.owoo)
II. u II (
ii.u)
-------
TABLE F-10B (CONT'D). TEST 10-2 EMISSIONS RESULTS
HOT TRANSIENT
PROJECT NO, 11-5011-0111
ENGINF N0.Gr.eS2
ENGINE MODEL -II GM 292
ENGINE l.B L(212 CID) V-8
CVS NO. 1
BAROMETER 711.13 MM HG(21.H IN HG)
DRV BULB TEHp. 28.3 OEG C(B3.0 DEG F)
TEST NO. 10-2 RUN
DATE 1/23/71
TIME ouse
DYNO NO. 2
GASOLINE tM-2h?-F
BAG CArtl NO. 2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 111 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 1.8 G«/KG( b8,8 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. ,171b
I
U)
u>
BAG RESULTS
RAG NIJMHER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM# H20HN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20CIN. H20)
hlowEh inlet temp. oeg. C(deg. fj
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TIME SECONDS
TOTAL FLOW STU. CU. *ETRF_S(SCF)
HC SAMPLE ME TEH/KANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/KAnGF/PPM
CO sample mfter/range/ppm
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 sample meier/range/pct
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METEK/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD 1ETER/RANGE/PPM
I
NYNF
bib.n (27.D
157.2 (in.n)
51.1 (13U.0)
7ms
272.11
182.1 ( bt31)
18.8/ 3/ 188
2.1)/ 3/ 20
17.n/ 3/ 1381
.8/ 3/ 21
11.8/ 3/ .21
2.8/ 3/ .01
2
LANF
711.2 (28.n)
172.1 (lB.b)
51.1 (130.0)
8085
30?. 0
205.2 ( 721b)
8.7/ 2/
.2/ 2/
11.0/ 3/
2.1/ 3/
18.b/ 3/
.5/ 3/
23.8/ 3/
2.1/ 3/
50.7/ 2/
.2/ 2/
110
21
551
15
.31
.01
51
0
3
LAF
7b2,0 (30.0)
511.0 (21.3)
51,1 (130.U)
8317
31b,0
201.1 ( 73t7)
10.1/ 3/ 1U1
l.b/ 3/ lb
12.1/ 3/ 12*1
,7/ 3/ 21
55,1/ 3/ .lb
2.8/ 3/ .01
bl,7/ 3/ 111
,3/ 3/ 1
1
NYNF
708.7 (27.1)
Ibl.8 (18.3)
51.1 (130.fl)
?lbl
c!72.(l
181.1
(
b123)
10.1/
3/
101
1.?/
3/
17
1.7/
3/
312
.7/
3/
2 J
11.7/
3/
.23
2.H/
3/
.111
21.5/
2/
21
.1/
2/
1
DILUTION FACTOR
31.88
2"».3S
12.28
11,00
HC CONCENTHA1ION PPM
Ibl
ieo
8b
12
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
1337
528
1111
2bb
C02 CONCENTRATION PCI
.11
.35
.12
.11
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
P.5
50.5
113.3
23, b
HC HASS GRAMS
11.22
1*».17
10,12
l.bl
CO MASS GRAMS
283.11
12f»,lb
210,31
Sb.3b
C02 MASS GRAMS
b17. 1
1218.0
3S30.b
b31. 2
NOX MASS GRAMS
2 « BB
l^.Zb
75.23
7.18
FUEL KG (LB)
.311
(
.87)
.18b
(
1.07)
1. 2b 7
(
a.7i)
.231
(
.53)
KW HR (HP HR)
.72
(
.lb)
1.21
(
l.bb)
3.80
I
S.10)
.51
(
.73)
RSHC G/KW HR (G/HP Hk)
b8,b5
(
51.11)
H.11
(
8.51)
2.71
(
2.05)
17.83
(
13.21)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HP)
315.35
(
211.81)
101 . b 3
(
75.71)
7b.12
I
5b.18)
103.71
(
77.3b)
BSCOg G/KW HR (G/HP HH)
102,b3
(
b73.H1)
1OHS.b 7
(
771.7b)
121.21
i
b12.1l)
117b.18
(
877.30)
BSNOX G/KK HR (G/HP HR)
1.02
(
2.11)
15,51
(
11.57)
11,80
(
11.77)
11.bl
(
10.1b)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HH)
.511
(
.103)
.311
(
. bl 3)
.331
i
.5*8)
.110
(
.723)
TOTAL TEST RESULTS 1 BAGS
TOTAL KW MR (HP HH) b.3tl ( P.15)
RSHC G/KW H« (G/HP HH) 13,25 ( 1.R8)
BSCO G/KW H» (G/HP HR) 120.03 ( 81.511)
BSC02 G/Kw HK (G/Hp HR) 170 ( 721)
BSNOX G/KW HK (G/HP HR) lb.72 ( 12.17)
BSFC KG/KW H« (LB/HP HR) .371 ( .b?2)
PARTICULATE DATA, total FOR 1 RAGS
10HM FILTtR
SAMPLE FLOW
MULTIPLIED FOR
MULTIPLIER Foff
MULTIPLIED FOR
211 X 21) FILTERS
SAMPLt FLOW
SCM(SCF)
G/TEST
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
G/KG FUEL (G/L8 FUtL)
SCM(SCF)
U.000 t 0.00)
n.oun
11,0000 (U.0UIUO
d.nouo (u.uonu)
n.ou (
O.Il)
-------
TABLE F-11A. ENGINE 1 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1177-78 IH MV101 — PROJECT 11-5011-001 gAROMErrKF 27.2/
01-21-78 TEST 11 DUR HRS IH101 K= 1.018 HUMr 15.3 G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
fuel
CALCULATED
G/HR
WT.
-----MODAL G/KWHR ——
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NQX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FIO
CO
NOX-CL
KM
1
IDLE
BIS
.537
10.01
31
10.b37
ISSb
17
203
2
.232
R
R
H
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
312
• 511
ia.it
US
12.717
120bb
33
1038
*1
.077
l.HS
35.BbO
1.122
21. b
3
SS PCT
T
sne
.120
12.25
lb?
13.2bl
Ib0l2
110
2211
205
.117
1.82b
37.2S1
3.115
11.1
*
25 PCT
T
as?
.111
11.so
178
12.121
12111
33
38b
fa 5
.077
1.1 b2
13.508
2. 2bS
21.3
5
10 PCT
T
131
.117
11.33
S7
11.112
S117
12
23b
23
.057
1.017
21.317
2.53S
B.2
b
25 PCT
T
abi
.111
11. 7S
183
12.010
120bb
2S
388
b 7
.U77
l.ObS
11.151
2.113
20.1
7
SO PCT
T
b8b
1.110
12.bl
1192
13.718
22770
128
3700
8S7
.113
1.218
37.518
1.018
73.5
8
es pct
T
ais
,21b
11.12
IS?
12,lbl
11131
23
110
b7
.077
,80b
11.3bb
2 . 3b3
21.3
9
C.T.
58
. 1 b5
q.Bo
5b
S.S71
512b
3
171
10
.113
R
R
R
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
2ia
.211
11.10
185
12.117
115b7
2b
121
bl
.077
. S13
11.555
2.218
21. b
2
55 PCT
T
518
.850
ia. as
b51
13.lb?
lbl S3
83
2112
2S2
.117
1.32b
33.811
1.b72
tb.b
3
25 PCT
222
.225
11.so
111
12.150
11310
23
125
be
.077
• 7S1
11.17S
2.308
21. S
1
10 PCT
T
81
.233
11.21
If B
11.153
8301
7
311
3S
.057
. bU8
28.BbO
3.311
8.8
S
25 PCT
T
252
. 23B
11.S7
2U1
12.23b
11131
2b
118
b8
.077
.
mm W
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 1-08-77
PROCEDURE
SFC
CALC
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0.0
0
1.1
R
R
.011
R
580
20.5
B.B
1.7
.3
1.5
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
2B.S
7b
2b.b
.111
1.1
.058
.551
2000
17.3
S.7
8.0
2.1
1.0
7 . b
3 55 PCT
T
bO.2
158
35.3
.587
3.1
.ObO
.357
2000
lb.b
-3b. 0
32.8
H.7
22. B
30.1
1 25 PCT
T
28. b
75
2b.7
.135
2.3
.055
. 5b1
2000
18.1
5.7
3.0
3.2
1.0
7.5
S 10 PCT
T
11.0
21
20.1
1.820
2.5
.052
1.107
2000
1S.1
1.5
1.3
1.0
5.0
2.1
b 25 PCT
T
27.1
72
2b.b
.170
2.1
.055
.510
2000
18.3
5.0
3.0
3.1
1.0
7.2
7 in PCT
T
S8,b
251
50.2
.501
1.1
. 0b3
.310
eooo
15.1
32.3
11.b
bb. 0
21.1
38.0
8 25 PCT
T
28.b
75
25.2
.882
2.1
.055
.537
2000
18.1
1.0
3.1
3.1
8.5
7.5
S C.T.
0.0
0
11.3
R
R
,01b
R
2UOO
21.1
1.0
2.1
1.0
7.1
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
28,S
7b
25.5
.881
2.2
.055
.53b
2000
18.1
5.1
3.1
3.2
8.7
7.1
2 55 PCT
T
b2. 5
lbl
35.7
.572
1.7
.ObO
.318
2000
lb.7
30.7
21.3
27.1
23.3
30.1
3 25 PCT
T
21.3
77
25.0
.853
2.3
.055
.511
2000
18.1
1.5
3.1
3.3
B.b
7.5
1 10 PCT
T
11.8
31
18.3
1.550
3.3
.052
.113
2000
IS.2
1.0
1.8
1.1
1.t>
2.2
5 25 PCT
T
28.1
7b
25.2
.871
2.1
.05b
.530
2000
18.0
5.1
3.3
3.1
8.b
7.1
b 10 PCT
T
100, 5
2b1
51.1
.51b
7.8
.ObS
.311
2000
1S.1
35.5
50.7
Sb.5
2b.1
37.b
7 25 PCT
T
21.3
77
21.8
.81b
2.1
.055
.511
2000
18.1
1.2
3.1
3.5
e.s
7.5
8 C.T.
(1.0
0
11.1
R
R
.015
R
2000
22.0
1.3
2.3
i.n
7.2
0.0
1 IDLE
0.0
U
1.2
K
R
.011
R
5 SO
20.5
12.fa
3.3
.3
1.3
0.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE '
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1J —
2.0
ib
7.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE '
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2) —
1.8
17
b.1
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0 . 35 (
2.0)
*• n.bst
1
.B) s
1. 8b3
G/KW
HH (
1.381
8S)
CO- NOIR
0 . 35 (
15.1)
~ 0.b5(
17
.0) =
Ib.bOS
G/KH
HK (31.753
BS)
NOX-CL
0 . 35 (
7.0)
+ 0.bS(
b
.1) =
b . 172
G/KW
HK (
5.111
B3)
HC +
NOX =
8.835
G/KW
HK (
b.588
bS)
SFC =
. IbO
KG/KW
HK (
. 7Sb
BS)
-------
TABLE F-11B. ENGINE 1 NINE-MODE ENISSIONS RESULTS
1977-78 IH MV*0* — PROJECT U-5U**-001 BAROMETER 29.IS
01-21-78 TEST 13 DOR HRS IH*0* K* 1.0B2 HUH= 1*.* G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
KT.
HOOAL G/KWHR
MODE
HC-FID
CO
COS
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT .
HC-FlO
CO
NOX-CL
13
35.*22
3.301
8.2
b 25 PCT
T
as?
.197
12.02
IBS
12.2*5
11* 7b
27
372
bl
.077
.957
13.21*
2.17*
21.0
7 9o PCT
T
712
l.lbo
12.73
1S37
13.171
2281b
132
3827
902
.113
1.330
38.b50
9.10b
73.8
B 25 PCT
T
eio
.ess
12.02
20*
12.2b1
11*31
22
*21
be
.077
.7*8
1*.*S*
2.32B
21.9
9 C.T.
S*
• ISb
9.59
S3
1. 752
*9S0
3
lb?
10
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
I
u>
-
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE-—-
SFC
calc
MODE ID
HP
TQ
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1
IDLE
0.0
0
*.3
R
R
.0*9
R
570
20.S
8.H
f.l
.3
*. 5
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
28.9
7b
2b.5
. 9 J H
1.5
.1158
.557
2000
17.2
b.l
7.9
2.1
9.1
7.5
3
55 PCT
T
fel.3
1 fa 1
35.8
.58*
*.*
.ObO
.355
20UU
lb.8
37.9
25.2
2* . 2
23.5
30.3
*
25 PCT
T
28.9
7b
25.5
.881
2.1
.055
.53b
2000
18.1
5.0
3.2
2.9
8.H
7.5
S
10 PCT
T
11.(1
29
17.0
1.539
3.3
.052
.93b
2000
19.2
.8
2.5
1.3
*.3
2.1
b
25 PCT
T
28.2
7*
2S.3
.898
2.2
.05b
. 5* b
2000
18.0
H.5
3.2
2.9
8.?
7.3
7
90 PCT
T
99.0
2b(l
50.3
.508
9.1
.Ob*
.309
2000
15.7
32.5
*?.7
b2. 3
25.*
37.7
8
25 PCT
T
29.3
77
25.2
.859
2.3
.05b
.523
2000
17.9
3.7
3.b
3.2
8.7
7 . b
S
C.T.
0.0
0
11.0
H
R
.0*5
R
2000
22.3
.9
2.b
.9
7.0
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
29.3
77
25.8
.880
2.3
.05b
.535
2000
17.9
S. 8
3.*
3.3
8.8
7 . b
2
SS PCT
T
bO.9
lbO
35.0
.57*
*.5
.ObO
.3*9
2000
lb. b
33.1
28.*
2b.0
22.9
30.1
3
25 PCT
T
28.9
7b
25.3
.87*
2.*
.05b
.532
2000
17.9
*.8
3 . b
3.*
a.7
7.5
»
10 PCT
T
11.8
31
20.0
l.b9*
2.b
.053
1.031
2000
IB.7
l.S
1.*
. 1.1
S.l
2.3
S
25 PCT
T
28.9
7b
25.2
.871
2.*
.05b
.530
20U0
17.9
*.9
3. b
3.*
B.b
7.5
b
90 PCT
T
99.0
2bb
S1.0
.515
8.0
.Ob5
.313
2000
15.*
3* • b
50.2
SB.O
25.7
37.b
7
2S PCT
T
BB.b
75
25.1
.879
2.*
. QSb
.635
2000
17.7
3.7
3.b
3.*
8.b
7.*
S
C.T.
0.0
B
11.s
R
R
.on
R
2000
21.a
1.1
2. *
l.'J
M
0.0
9
IDLE
0.0
0
*.1
R
R
.050
R
570
20.1
10.*
3.*
.3
*.2
0.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1J-
2.1
*1
7.*
SUM
(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2>-
1.7
*5
7.U
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0.35(
2.1)
•f D.b5(
1
-7) =
1.798
G/KW
HR I
1.3*1
83)
CO- NDIR
0.35C
*0.1)
~ t». t. 5 C
*S
.2) =
*3.b87
G/KW
HR (32.578
88)
NOX-CL
0.3SC
7.*}
+ O.feSt
7
.0) =
7.130
G/KW
HR (
5.317
BS)
HC +
NOX =
8.928
G/KW
HR (
b.bS?
U3)
SFC =
.*59
KG/KW
HK (
.75*
US J
1
25 PCT
T
257
.231
12.02
19b
12.280
11703
27
**b
b7
.077
,93b
15.198
2.2BB
21.9
2
55 PCT
T
blO
.800
12.37
b3b
13.239
1587b
82
1938
27*
.1*7
1.3S3
31.B0I)
* . * 9 b
*5.*
3
25 PCT
T
219
. 2*9
12.02
205
12.29*
ll*7b
23
*70
b9
.077
.792
lb.2*9
2.375
21.b
*
10 PCT
T
115
.159
11.5b
110
11.731
9072
10
2*8
31
.057
.8 + 1
20.973
2.SB8
a.8
S
25 PCT
T
22b
.2*9
12.02
208
12.29*
11*31
2*
*bB
b9
.077
.81*
lb.lbS
2.*0U
21. b
b
9fl PCT
T
blO
1.3b0
12.85
13b9
1*.279
23133
112
**51
797
.113
1.133
**.951
8 . 0* b
73.8
7
25 PCT
T
173
.251
12.1*
207
12.*10
11385
18
*bS
b8
.077
. b2 3
lb.28b
2.388
21.3
8
C.T.
*9
.157
9.82
Sb
9.983
521b
3
lbb
11
.1*3
R
R
H
0.0
9
IDLE
Bbt>
.*25
10.33
3f»
10.851
18b0
lb
1*7
2
.232
R
R
h
0.0
-------
TABLE F-12A, ENGINE 6 HINE-RQDE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1977
-78 IH*0*
-- PROJECT .
U-50**-0
PAR"
2T51
G/K6
01
0* 79
13b PH
TEST b3
IH*0*B
K = .
788 HUHa *.0
concentration
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
WT.
.—.MODAL G/KWHR—--
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON f
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KH
X
IDLE
5280
• 290
9.b9
20
10.230
907
22
52
0
.332
R
R
R
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
2332
.810
11.**
210
12.511
10*33
217
13b*
*b
,077
7.319
*5.93b
1.5*3
22.1
3
55 PCT
T
9**
1.H30
11.5b
1099
13.09b
lbl03
130
3552
35*
.1*?
2.013
5*.8b*
5. *b2
*8,3
*
25 PCT
T
lbn
. SHO
11. h7
370
15.Pb8
10070
15
9b2
79
.077
.*95
32.37b
2.b75
22.1
S
11) PCT
T
78
.350
10.99
11*
11.3*9
7212
b
**9
19
.057
.51b
*2.138
1.778
8.0
b
25 PCT
T
iab
.*90
1 I.5b
tio
12.nb*
10070
12
82b
90
.077
.*11
28.927
3.135
21.3
7
90 PCT
T
57b
1.280
12.1*
159
--
--
IJHITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-OB-77
PROCEDURE
3FC
CALC
MODE 10
HP
TO
FC
8SFC
bsnox
F/A
KG/KM HR
RPM
A/F
HC
Co
NOX
FUEL POWER
1
IDLE
0.0
0
2.0
R
R
.0*7
R
530
21.2
8.9
.9
.1
2.2
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
21.7
7B
23.0
.77*
1.5
.057
.*71
2000
17.5
29.0
7.b
2.1
B.S
7.3
3
55 PCT
T
b* . 7
17|)
35.5
.5*8
5.5
.ObO
.33*
2000
lb.7
33.2
37.9
31.b
85.3
30.*
*
25 PCT
T
29.7
78
22.2
.7*7
2.7
,05b
.*55
2000
17.1
2.0
s.*
3.7
8,8
7.3
5
10 PCT
T
10.7
28
15.9
I.*91
1.8
.052
.907
2000
19.3
.5
1.*
.7
*.*
1.9
b
25 PCT
T
28.b
75
22.2
.777
3.1
.055
.*73
2000
18,2
l.fe
*.b
8.2
7.0
7
90 PCT
T
107.0
281
52.5
.*91
b.9
.0b2
.298
2000
lb.2
22,*
37.5
SQ.b
28, b
38. b
8
25 PCT
T
30.5
8it
21.5
.70b
f.b
.053
• *29
2000
19.0
1.7
2,8
b.S
8.0
7.5
9
C.T.
0.0
0
9.5
R
R
.0*3
R
2000
23.1
.7
1.*
.5
b.b
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
30.5
80
21.9
.719
*.b
.052
.*37
2000
19.1
*.1
*.b
5.0
8.3
7.*
2
55 PCT
T
bS.9
173
33.9
.515
8.*
,05b
.313
2000
17.8
37,*
21.9
37.7
8*.7
30.*
3
25 PCT
T
30.8
81
21.8
.707
*.b
.053
.*30
2000
IB.9
3.b
*.h
5.1
8.3
7.*
*
10 PCT
T
11.*
30
15.7
1.37*
3.1
.0*5
.83b
2000
22.0
1.1
2.5
.9
*.*
2.0
5
25 PCT
T
30.5
80
22.0
.722
*.7
.053
.*39
2000
19.0
3.9
*.9
5.1
8,*
7.*
b
90 PCT
T
10b. b
280
SI.5
.*83
7.3
.Obi
.29*
2000
lb.*
3*. 8
51.7
*0.7
28,8
37.8
7
25 PCT
T
31. b
83
20.7
. b55
*.*
.05*
.398
2000
18,7
2.5
*.7
5.0
7,9
7«b
8
C.T.
0.0
n
9.5
R
R
.0**
R
2000
22.8
1.5
2.2
.*
b. 7
0.0
9
IDLE
0.0
0
2.1
R
R
.0*8
R
575
20.8
11.2
3.0
,1
2,*
0.0
SUM
(COMPOSITE VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1)-
2.5
59
7.0
.SUM
— (COMPOSITE VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
1.3
35
9.1
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0. 35 (
2.5)
+ 0.bS(
1
.3) s
1.70*
G/KW
HR
1.271
BS)
CO- NDJ«
D.3S(
58.9)
* 0.b5(
3*
.7) s
*3.19*
G/KW
HR
32.210
BS)
NOX-CL
0. 35(
7.0)
t 0.b5(
9
• 1) a
8.35*
G/KW
HR
b,229
BS)
HC t
NOX s
10,058
G/KW
HR
7.500
BS)
SFC =
.391
KG/KW
HR
.b*3
BS)
-------
TABLE F-12B. ENGINE 6 NINE-RODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1977-7R IH*0* — PROJECT U-50**-0
01 01 79 359 PM TEST b*» IH*0*C Ks .827 HUMs 5.0 G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
WT.
MODAL G/KWHR
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
idle
2112
.32(1
9.59
20
10.1*2
907
21
58
0
.232
R
R
R
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
332
. 82D
11.52
305
12.377
10b59
32
1*27
72
.077
1. Ob3
*7.*18
2.397
22.*
3
55 PCT
T
992
1.130
11. 5b
1122
13.101
lbO 12
13b
3530
37b
.1*7
2.078
53.899
5.7*7
*8.8
*
25 PCT
T
152
.550
11.b?
3bO
12.237
1020b
1*
927
82
.077
.*b5
30.*15
2.70b
22.7
s
10 PCT
T
72
.310
10.88
109
11.228
7303
5
**7
19
.057
.•~55
39.101
1.70*
8.5
b
25 PCT
T
120
.*70
11.**
*ns
11.923
1002*
11
798
93
.077
.37*
2b.532
3.107
22.*
7
9(1 PCT
T
528
1.1*0
12.1*
lb53
13.339
233bO
10*
*033
795
.113
.177
37.820
7. *53
79.5
8
25 PCT
T
118
.290
11.33
b20
11.b33
9752
11
*91
1*3
.077
.3bS
lb.120
*.b8*
22.7
9
C.T.
120
.130
9.28
**
9.*23
*2b*
b
119
5
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
I
25 PCT
T
15b
.290
11.10
blO
11.*07
9B88
15
508
1*5
.077
.*93
lb.bbB
* . 7b5
22.7
2
55 PCT
T
552
.*70
11.79
lb?b
12.322
15195
7b
1171
5b7
.1*7
1.170
17.980
8.71*
*8.b
3
25 PCT
T
1*0
.290
11.33
b*0
ll.hSb
993*
13
500
150
.077
.*21
15.823
*.7*b
23. b
*
10 PCT
T
b8
.2*0
ln.bb
185
10.908
7212
5
331
3*
.057
.408
2b.305
2.75b
1.1
S
25 PCT
T
152
.290
11.21
b30
11.517
9979
15
508
150
.077
.*75
lb.*5b
*.858
23.0
fa
90 PCT
T
*80
.970
12.25
lb7b
13.27*
2290b
93
3381
79*
.113
.878
31.825
7.*73
79.2
7
25 PCT
T
in*
.280
11.33
bSO
11.b2?
9888
10
*81
152
.077
.308
15.0*5
*.7*7
23.1
8
C.T.
bO
.150
9.38
*b
9.537
*309
3
137
b
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
9
IDLE
1120
.590
9.90
38
10.bl3
113*
13
127
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
I
-
...
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77
PROCEDURE
SFC
CALC
total-
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
kg/km hr
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
fuel power
1
IDLE
n.o
0
2.0
• R
R
.0*7
R
*85
21.*
11.2
1.0
.1
2.2
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
3lt.l
79
23.5
.781
2.*
.057
.*75
2000
17.7
5.7
8,*
3.1
8.8
7.3
3
55 PCT
T
bS.S
172
35.3
.539
5.7
.PbO
.328
2000
lb.7
*b.S
31.b
31.2
25.1
30.*
*
25 PCT
T
30.5
8(1
22.5
.739
2.7
.05b
.**9
2000
17.9
2.5
5.*
3.b
8.*
7.*
5
JO PCT
T
11.*
311
lb. 1
l.*n9
1.7
.051
.857
2000
11.5
.7
1.1
.b
*.*
2.1
b
25 PCT
r
3n.l
79
22.1
.735
3.1
.05*
.**7
2000
18.*
2.0
*.7
*.1
8.2
7.3
7
90 PCT
T
lob.b
280
51.5
.*83
7.5
.nbl
.29*
2000
lb.*
27.*
3*. 8
SO.7
28.2
3B.1
8
25 PCT
T
30.5
80
21.5
.70b
*.7
.053
.*29
2000
18.9
2.0
2.1
b.2
8.0
7.*
9
C.T.
0.11
(1
9.*
R
R
.0*3
R
2000
23.1
2.0
1.3
.*
b.S
0.0
1
?5 PCT
T
30.5
80
21.8
.71b
*.8
.052
.*35
2000
19.2
3.9
s.o
S.O
8.3
7.*
2
55 PCT
T
b5.1
171
33.5
.51*
B.7
. 05b
.313
2000
17.8
37.9
22.2
37.b
2*.*
30.0
3
25 PCT
T
31. b
83
21.1
. b93
*.7
.053
.*21
2000
18.9
3.5
5.0
5.2
8.3
7.b
*
ID PCT
T
12.2
32
15.9
1.305
2.8 '
.050
.79*
2000
20.1
1.0
2.*
.1
*.s
2.2
5
25 PCT
T
3(1.8
91
22.0
.713
*.9
.053
.*3*
2000
19.0
3.8
s.o
5.2
8.*
7.*
b
91) PCT
T
10b.2
279
50.5
.*75
7.5
.ObO
.289
2000
lb.5
35.b
*1.3
*0.*
28.2
37.b
7
25 PCT
T
32. n
8*
21.8
. b81
*.7
.053
.*15
2000
18.9
2. b
*.8
5.3
a.3
7.7
•
C.T.
0.(1
fl
i.s
R
A
,0**
fl
tooo
M,8
4.*
!.«
.*
0,0
9
IDLE
ti.n
n
2.5
R
R
.0*9
R
5*0
20.5
10.3
3.B
.1
2.1
0.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1)-'
1.8
5b
7.5
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
value for
CYCLE 2)
----
--
1.2
33
1.3
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
m
HC- FID
0.35(
1.8)
+ 0.b5(
1
.2) =
l.**b
G/KW
HR
1.078
BS)
CO- NDIR
0. 35 (
55.5)
~ U.b5(
32
.b) «
*0.b32
G/KW
HR
30.299
BS)
NOX-CL
0.35(
7.5)
~ 1.bS(
9
.3) s
8 . b98
G/KW
HR
b. *8b
BS)
HC +
NOX =
10.1**
G/KW
HR
7.5b5
BS)
SFC =
.389
KG/KW
HR
• b*0
BS)
-------
,A. ENGINE 7 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1178 CHEV
*5* —
PROJECT
11-50*
29:2/
01 30 7*
TEST 71
OOP, HRS
K= .
7b0 HUMS 3.2
G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
fuel
calculated G/HR
WT.
— MODAL G/KWHR
MODF.
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
g/hr
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KM
1 idle
1450
i.ssn
9.50
13
ll.feSl
29*8
*1
1017
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
2 ?S PCT
T
113
.OSS
11.00
573
11.117
105HS
20
183
137
.077
. bbQ
S.S21
*.*5?
23.0
3 55 PCT
T
2SS
,1(U
11.70
1552
11.83*
lbfbS
*b
283
5*5
.1*7
,b35
3. 8b7
7.*5*
5*.5
* 25 PCT
T
1*3
. 0S8
11.10
b25
11.21H
10715
15
ISO
152
.077
.**b
5.555
*.*31
25. b
S 10 PCT
T
7b
.13*
in.90
2*5
1U.S*3
78*7
b
1 ss
**
.057
. *2S
13.817
3.1*7
10.5
b 25 PCT
T
135
.i»sa
li.in
b52
11.213
1088b
1*
1S2
lbO
.07?
.*1S
S.b02
*.bbl
25.b
7 SO PCT
T
3 US
1.228
13.50
1*U7
l*.7b3
2517*
bO
*230
b05
.113
,*so
3*.*Sb
*.S38
Si.*
8 25 PCT
T
109
.1113
11 .30
701
11.* 15
10*33
11
1S1
lb2
.077
.320
5.5b*
*.718
25.b
S C.T.
1 b 8
.isa
11 .10
3S
11.2*7
*7b3
8
1111
*
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
123
.ina
11.10
bSo
11.215
10bl *
13
IS*
lbS
.077
.377
5.b73
* .80S
25.b
2 55 PCT
T.
202
.107
11. bo
1507
11.730
1 b55b
32
30b
53?
.1"
.*2*
*.07*
7.15b
55.S
3 25 PCT
T
in?
.103
11.20
b?2
11.315
105bS
11
1S5
158
.077
.328
5.751
* ,b7*
25.3
* 10 PCT
T
5B
.151
11.00
228
11•lb 1
7b20
*
213
3S
.057
.3*0
lb.**7
3.03*
*.7
5 25 PCT
T
115
.101
11.10
h8*
11.213
10523
12
1S1
lb2
.077
.358
S.bSi
*.83*
25.0
b So PCT
T
255
1.125
13.50
1*SS
l*.b5*
252b5
50
3S17
b52
.113
.*11
32.1*2
5.353
so.s
7 25 PCT
T
93
. L03
11.20
732
11.31*
lObSS
10
IS?
17*
.077
. 2B*
5.73b
5.07S
25. b
B C.T.
Kb
.128
11.10
*0
11.23b
*S**
3
11*
*
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
S IDLE
3**
.770
10.so
2b
11.708
2722
9
3b2
2
.232
R
R
R
0.0
CO __ _______ ___ _ ______
UNITS AS SPECIFIED IN THF. S-08-77 PROCEDURE SFC CAIC PERCENT OF TOTAL--—
MODE ID HP TO FC BSFC BSNOX F/A KG/KW HR RPM A/F HC CO NOX FUEL POWER
1
idle
0.0
0
b.5
R
R
.05*
R
b70
18.5
32.3
28.1
.1
b.b
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
3(1.8
81
? 3.3
.755
*.5
.051
. *5S
2000
IS.7
5.*
1.7
5.3
7.S
b. 7
3
55 PCT
T
73.1
1 S2
3h.3
,*Sb
7.5
.05*
.302
2000
18. b
23.*
*.S
*0.3
23.*
30.1
*
25 PCT
T
3*.3
su
23.8
.bS*
*.H
.051
.*22
2000
lS.b
*.0
1.7
5.S
8.0
7.*
5
in PCT
T
l*.l
37
17.3
1.228
3.1
.050
.7*7
2000
20.0
1.2
1.3
1.3
* . 3
2.2
b
25 PCT
T
3*.3
SO
2* .0
.700
*.7
.051
• *2b
2000
lS.b
3.8
1.8
b . 2
8.1
7.*
7
SU PCT
T
122.b
322
55.5
.*53
*.s
.Ob7
.275
2000
1*.S
23.2
5b.S
3*.*
27.*
38.8
8
25 PCT
T
3*.3
SO
23.0
.b?l
*.7
.052
.*08
2000
IS.2
2 . S
1.7
b. 3
7.8
7.*
S
C.T.
'1.0
0
10.5
R
R
.051
R
2000
IS.5
3. S
l.S
.3
b.b
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
3*.3
Si!
23.*
. b83
*.8
.051
.*15
2000
lS.b
b.O
2.3
b.l
7 . S
7.3
2
55 PCT
T
75.0
1S7
3b. 5
.*87
7.2
.053
. 2Sb
2000
18.7
28.1
b.8
38.2
23.b
30.b
3
25 PCT
T
33.S
8S
23.3
. b87
*.7
.052
.*18
2000
IS.*
5.1
2.3
5.S
7.S
7.2
*
10 PCT
T
12.S
3*
lb.a
1.2S8
3.0
.051
. 78S
2000
IS.fa
1.5
1.8
1.1
*.2
2.0
5
25 PCT
T
33.5
an
23.2
• hS2
*.8
.051
.*21
2000
lS.b
5.5
2.2
b.O
7.8
7.2
b
SU PCT
T
121.S
320
55.7
.*57
5.*
. Obb
.278
2000
15.1
3* .0
b7 .1
35.7
27.7
38.2
7
25 PCT
T
3*.3
Stl
23.5
. K8b
5.1
.052
.*17
sono
IS;*
*.S
2.3
b.5
8.0
7.3
8
C.T.
>1.0
U
10.S
R
R
.051
R
2000
IS.5
2.8
2.5
.3
b.8
0.0
S
IDLE
0.0
11
h.O
R
R
.05*
R
b75
18.7
12.*
12.7
.2
b.l
0.0
sum—(cowposne value for cycle d
SUM-—(COMPOSITE VALUE FOH CYCLE 2)
TWO CYCLE COMPOSITE -
HC- FID 0.35C 1.1) ~ 0.b5(
CO- NDIR U.3SC 31.b) + ll.bS(
NOX-CL 0.3S( 7.5) * 0.b5(
HC
.b) =
2*.b) s
7.7) =
~ NOX =
SFC a
1.1
32
7.5
.b
25
7.7
.787
G/KN
HR
(
.58?
BS)
27.021
G/KW
HR
(
20.150
BS)
7.bl7
G/KW
HR
C
S.b80
BS)
8.*03
G/KW
HK
£
b.2bb
83}
,38b
KG/KH
HR
C
.b35
BS)
-------
TABLE F-13B. ENGINE 7 N!NE-tfQDE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1*78 CHEV *5* -- PROJECT ll-SO* PAX* 2.T.5?
01 31 AM TEST 72 DllR HRS K» .753 HUM« 3,0 G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED
G/HR
WT.
--•--MODAL G/KWHR-----
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
carbon
G/HR
hC
CO
NOX
FACT,
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
IDLE
R8b
l.*32
1.P0
15
11.330
3530
31
103
1
.232
R
R
R
0,0
2
25 PC T
T
1 BO
.01ft
io.sq
578
11.108
113*0
20
202
1*8
,077
,b02
5.157
*,355
25,3
3
55 PCT
T
• 1 OH
1 l,b7
1 b 3b
11.808
17010
*fa
301
581
.1*7
.bO*
*.0S*
7,731
5b,e
<1
25 PCT
T
l?2
.101
11.10
b7*
11.21*
112*1
1*
20*
lbl
,077
,388
5,818
*,827
2b,1
5
10 PCT
T
7*
.155
10.81
?*b
10.17*
834b
7
238
*7
,057
.*37
15,bl3
3,072
11,*
b
25 PCT
T
13*
.101
10.11
b5?
11.105
113*0
15
208
ib7
,077
,*38
5,188
*,805
25,8
7
*0 PCT
T
251
1 .081
13.51
I*b5
1*.707
25801
50
3851
b*3
.113
.*11
31,Sb1
5 , 2bO
ii,e
8
25 PCT
T
9*
.101
11.10
b17
11.211
112*1
10
20*
175
,077
.213
S.blb
*.887
2b, 7
1
C.T.
I no
• 1 3*
10. n
36
11.135
553*
b
135
5
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
25 PCT
T
107
.101
10,11
bbb
11.102
1129*
12
207
lbl
.077
.352
b.032
*.1**
25,b
2
55 PCT
T
211
.11*
11. fe7
1721
11.808
Iblll
3*
331
bSO
.1*7
,**3
*.3*8
8,13b
5b, 8
3
25 PCT
T
105
.101
11.10
718
11.212
112*1
12
20*
180
.077
,33*
5,811
5,1*3
2b, 1
<1
10 PCT
T
52
.1*3
10,88
238
11.021
B3*b
*
218
*5
.057
,28b
1*,331
2,157
U,*
5
25 PCT
T
113
. im
11.10
7 Of
11.213
113*0
13
20b
178
.077
, 3fab
5,130
5,131
25,8
b
*0 PCT
T
? 12
1.030
13.b*
1*35
l*.b1*
25111
*3
3b71
b3S
.113
,3*1
30,00*
5,177
11,*
7
25 PCT
T
10
.101
11.10
7*2
11.211
11113
10
201
18*
.077
,277
5,b28
5,131
2b,7
8
C.T.
mo
.131
11.10
38
11.2*2
Sb 70
b
13*
5
.1*3
R
R
R
0,0
1
IDLE
351
.811
10,11
87
11,8*1
3538
12
*10
2
,232
R
R
R
0,0
UMIT3 *8 SPECIFIED IN THE *-08-77 PROCEDURE
SFC
CAL
MODE ID
HP
TO
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
kg/kw hr
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1
IDLE
0.0
0
7.8
R
R
.052
R
700
11.1
28,1
2b.fa
,1
7,5
0,0
2
25 PCT
T
33.1
89
25,0
.738
*.*
.051
,**1
2000
11.7
fa.2
2.0
5.3
7.1
7.1
3
55 PCT
T
7b.?
?00
37,5
.*12
7.7
.05*
,211
2000
18. b
2b,7
5,8
*0,b
28,8
30, b
*
25 PCT
T
35.0
1?
2* .8
.708
*.8
.051
.*31
2000
11.b
*,1
2.0
b.l
7.1
7,*
5
10 PCT
T
15.2
*0
18.*
1.208
3.1
,050
.735
2000
20,0
1,5
1,7
1.2
».3
2,*
b
25 PCT
T
3*.?
11
25.0
.721
*.8
.051
.*31
2000
11.7
*,b
2.0
b,0
7,1
7,3
7
10 PCT
T
122.2
321
5b,1
,*bS
5.3
,0b7
,283
2000
15.0
22.*
55.*
3* ,0
2b.b
37,7
8
25 PCT
T
35.8
1*
2*, R
,b13
*.1
.051
.*21
2000
11.b
9.2
2.0
b ,3
7.1
7.5
1
C.T.
o.n
0
12.2
R
R
,051
R
2000
11.?
3.1
2.*
,3
7.2
0,0
1
25 PCT
T
3*.3
10
2* .1
.787
*.*
.051
,**2
2000
11,7
S,"»
8,*
5.1
7,1
7.2
2
55 PCT
T
7b.2
200
37.3
,*10
8.1
,05*
.218
2000
18.b
21.0
7.2
*1.8
22.b
30,5
3
25 PCT
T
35.0
12
2*.8
.708
5,1
.051
.*31
2000
11,b
5,3
8,3
b,3
7.1
7,*
*
10 PCT
T
15.?
*0
18.*
1.208
3,0
.050
,735
2000
11,1
1,5
1.1
1,2
"».3
2,»
5
25 PCT
T
3*.»
11
25.0
.721
5.1
.051
.*31
2000
11.b
5,7
2.*
fa,2
7.1
7,3
b
10 PCT
T
l??.t>
322
57.3
,*b7
5,2
,0b7
,28*
2000
IS.O
28,2
bl.B
32,*
2b. 7
37,8
7
25 PCT
T
35,R
1*
2*.5
, t»B*
5,1
,051
,*lb
2000
11.b
*,5
2,3
fa,*
7.8
7,5
8
C.T,
o.n
0
12.5
R
R
,051
R
2000
11.5
*,7
8,8
,3
7.*
0,0
1
IDLE
o.n
0
7.8
R
R
,05*
R
750
18.5
15.8
lb.1
,8
7,5
0,0
SUM
—(composhe
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1>-
,1
21
7,8
SUM
—(COMPOSITE
VALUE FOB
CYCLE 2)-
•
1
i
«
1
•
•
¦
1
•
•
1
1
25
8.1
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
m
HC- FID
0.3SC
.1)
~ o.bsr
,bj »
.731
G/KW
HR (
,5*5
BS)
CO- NDIR
0. 35 (
28.8)
~ 0,b5(
2*
, b) «
2b,Obi
G/KW
HR (
11.**0
BS)
NOX-CL
0.35(
7.8)
~ 0,bS{
8
,1) *
7.118
G/KW
HR (
5,1b*
BS)
HC ~
NOX c
8.721
G/KW
HR (
fa. 510
BS)
SFC *
.*02
KG/KM
HR (
.bbl
BS)
¦PERCENT OF TOTAL
-------
TABLE F-1'JA. ENGINE 8 NINE-KODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1178
IH*0*
PROJECT
11-50*
2'?.o3
02-15-71
3S2bPM
TEST 83
IH*0*
K= .
11? HUMe 7.8
G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED
TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED G/HR
NT,
MODAL G/KWHR
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX-CL
CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FIO
CO
NOX-CL
KW
1
IDLE
2*32
.*81
1.38
2*
10.13b
181*
*8
177
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
3B*
.571
11.1?
101
12.512
110b8
38
102?
27
.077
1.32b
35.175
.1*b
21.3
3
55 PCT
T
8R3
.''73
12.02
*b
13.012
l*1b1
11*
22*7
lb
.1*7
1.12*
38.Ob 3
.271
**.0
*
?5 PCT
T
232
.383
12.02
125
12.*21
108*1
23
b?*
33
.077
.715
23.b03
l.lb2
21.3
5
10 PCT
T
8b
.302
10. 8B
l*b
11.112
7530
b
*11
30
.057
. 5b2
35.150
2 • b 18
8.5
b
95 PCT
T
2**
.218
11.71
118
12.035
lOSbl
2*
387
53
.077
.831
13.5*0
1.85*
21.3
7
10 PCT
T
5B1
.135
12.bR
1371
I3.b8l
210*7
101
2105
b*b
.113
1.021
21.3**
b .52*
73.9
8
25 PCT
T
112
.112
11.10
178
12.II1*
lOSbl
H
331
*7
.077
. b5b
11.872
l.bSb
21.3
i
C.T.
*n
.1*0
1.*2
*b
1.5b*
*853
2
1*3
7
.1*3
R
R
R
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
1^2
.112
11. 71
15*
12.00*
107S5
11
3*1
*2
.077
, b7b
12,211
l.*77
21.3
2
55 PCT
T
488
.*b5
12.25
b*S
12.770
l*5b0
b3
1071
22*
.It?
1.053
18,021
3.770
**.3
3
25 PCT
T
lb8
.187
11.71
171
11.11b
lObl*
1?
33S
*8
.077
.510
11.873
1.711
21.0
*
10 PCT
T
bll
.2bl
10.88
170
11.1*8
7575
5
358
35
.057
.3*0
2b.871
2.b3l
1.1
5
as pct
T
1B5
.205
11.10
173
12.12b
10715
18
370
*7
,077
,b*5
12.131
1 «b*2
21.3
b
no PCT
T
*88
1.080
12.85
1212
13.185
213b*
85
3333
bOl
.113
, 8bO
33.12*
b . 117
73.3
7
25 PCT
T
1*8
.201
11.10
18*
12.125
10523
1*
3bb
*1
.077
,503
12.805
1.702
21.3
8
C.T.
5*
.1**
1.*2
>(8
1.570
*811
3
1*1
7
.its
R
R
R
0.0
1
IDLE
22*0
.251
1.*8
22
1.177
1*17
3?
7b
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
i
-
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN THE 1-08-77
PROCEDURE
SFC
CALC
TOTAL-
MODE ID
HP
TQ
FC
BSFC
BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW HR
RPM
a/f
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1
IDLE
n.o
0
*.0
R
R
.0*7
R
b30
21.*
23.2
*.H
.3
*.5
0.0
2
25 PCT
T
28.b
75
2*.*
.85*
.1
.057
.520
2000
1?.*
b.l
8.5
2.3
1.0
7.5
3
55 PCT
T
Sl.o
155
33.0
.551
.3
.ObO
.3*0
2000
lb.?
3*.1
35.5
2.b
23.3
21.b
*
25 PCT
T
28.b
75
23.1
.837
1.2
«0S7
.501
2000
17.7
3.7
S.b
2.8
8.8
7.5
5
10 PCT
T
11.*
30
lb.fe
1 . * 53
2 . b
.0S1
.88*
2000
11.b
.8
2.5
1.1
*.5
2.2
b
25 PCT
T
28.b
?5
23.3
.81b
1.1
.055
.*1b
2000
18.3
S.*
3.2
*.5
e.b
7.5
7
10 PCT
T
11.0
2bn
*b.*
. * bl
b.S
.0b2
.285
2000
lb.l
23.1
35.3
80, S
25.2
38.2
8
25 PCT
T
28. b
75
23.3
.81b
1.7
.055
.*1b
2000
18.2
3.0
2.8
*.0
8 . b
7.5
1
C.T.
0.0
0
10.7
R
R
.0**
R
2000
22.8
.7
2.2
1.1
7.*
0,0
1
25 Pr.T
T
28.b
75
23.8
.833
1.5
.055
.507
2000
18.3
*.5
3.8
2.7
8.1
7.5
2
55 PCT
T
51.*
15b
32.1
.5*0
3.8
.058
.321
2000
1?.2
27. b
22.*
27.8
23.0
21.7
3
25 PCT
T
28.2
7*
23.*
.830
1.7
.055
.505
2000
18.3
3.8
3.7
3.1
8.8
?.*
*
10 PCT
T
13.3
35
lb.?
1.253
2.b
.051
.7b2
2000
11.b
.8
2.1
1.7
*.b
2 . b
5
25 PCT
T
28. b
75
23.8
.833
l.b
.055
.507
2nno
18.1
*.3
*.0
3.0
8.1
7.5
b
it) PCT
T
18.2
258
*7.1
. * 71
b.l
.Ob*
.212
2000
15.7
28.7
53,b
57.3
25.1
37.8
7
25 PCT
T
28. b
75
23.2
.812
1.?
.055
.*1*
8000
18.1
3.3
~.0
3.2
8.7
7.5
8
C.T.
0.0
0
10.8
R
R
.0**
R
2000
23.7
1.3
3.0
.1
7.5
0.0
1
IDLE
0.0
0
3.3
R
R
.0*b
R
boo
21.8
25.7
2.5
.2
3.7
0,0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 1)-
2.2
*3
*.2
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR
CYCLE 2)-
1.5
32
S.*
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID
0.35(
2.2)
+ 0,b5(
1
.5) =
1,75*
G/KW
HR
1.308
BS)
CO- NDIR
0 . 35 (
*2 . b )
+ 0.bS(
32
.1) =
35.758
G/KW
HR
2b.bbS
BS)
NOX-CL
0.3S(
*.2)
+ U.b5(
s
.*) s
*.1b1
G'KW
HR
3.70S
BS)
HC ~
NOX =
b, 723
G/KW
HR
5.013
BS)
SFC =
.*28
KG/KW
HR
.703
BS)
-------
TABLE F-14B. ENGINE 8 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1178 IH101 — PROJECT 11-501 BAKsSVm-
02-19-79 TEST 85 Xs .71? HUH = S.* G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MEASURED TOTAL
FUEL
calculated g/hr
WT.
MODAL G/KWHR
MODE
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX-CL CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
HC-FID
CO
NOX-CL
KM
I IDLE
22*0
.282
9.59
30 10.118
110b
31
79
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
2*8
,11b
11.b?
199 11.813
10b59
25
2b5
11
.077
.881
9.391
1.57b
21.0
3 55 PCT
T
121
. 2H9
12.25
910 12.5b7
11878
5b
fall
2b?
.117
.89b
10.212
1.252
1b.9
1 25 PCT
T
19b
.lib
11.b7
233 11.837
10387
19
258
51
.077
. fa38
8.579
l.bBS
22.1
S 10 PCT
T
7b
.250
10.77
195 11.028
71b7
5
328
31
.057
• 1b1
27.7b?
2 . bb2
8.8
fa 25 PCT
T
188
.lib
11. b7
225 11.837
10178
19
2b0
19
.077
. b25
8 . 7b5
l.bb3
22.1
7 <10 PCT
T
3M
.910
13.10
lbS3 11.019
22153
b2
2937
b55
.113
.591
27.839
b.211
78.7
8 25 PCT
T
1S2
• lib
11.79
210 11.953
10523
15
259
52
.077
.503
8.718
1. 7b1
22.1
1 C.T.
39
.117
9.28
51 9.101
1b72
2
118
b
.113
R
R
R
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
2*8
.lib
11.b7
199 11.813
10b59
25
2b5
11
.07?
.881
9.391
1.57b
21.0
2 55 PCT
•T
121
. 2b9
12.25
910 12.Sb?
11878
5b
fall
2b?
.117
.89b
10.212
1.252
lb. 9
3 as PCT
T
19b
.lib
11.b7
233 11.837
10387
19
258
51
.077
,b38
8.579
l.bSS
22.1
* 10 PCT
T
7b
.250
10.77
195 11.028
71b7
5
328
31
.057
• 1b1
27.7b7
2 • bb2
8.8
5 25 PCT
T
188
• lib
11. b7
225 11.837
10178
19
2b0
19
.077
,b25
8.7b5
1. bb3
22.1
b 10 PCT
T
311
.910
13.10
lb53 11.019
22153
b2
2937
b5S
.113
.591
27.839
b. 211
78.7
7 25 PCT
T
152
.l»b
11.79
210 11.953
10523
15
259
52
.07?
. S03
8.718
1.7b1
22.1
8 C.T.
39
.117
9.28
51 9.101
1b?2
2
118
b
.113
R
R
R
0.0
9 IDLE
22*0
.282
9.59
30 10.118
110b
31
79
1
.232
R
R
R
0.0
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN
THE 9-08-77 PROCEDURE
3FC
CALC
TOTAL-
....
mode id
HP
TQ
FC
BSFC BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW hr
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX
FUEL
POWER
1 IDLE
0.0
U
3.1
R R
.017
R
550
21.5
2b.b
3.3
.2
3.5
0.0
2 25 PCT
T
2».2
71
23.5
.831 l.b
.051
.507
2000
18. b
b.1
3.b
2 • b
8.8
7.0
3 55 PCT
T
b2.S
lbS
32.8
.522 1.3
.057
.318
2000
17.S
27.7
lb.9
29.9
23.1
29.9
1 25 PCT
T
30.1
79
22. *
.7bl 1.7
.051
. 1b3
2000
18.b
5.0
3.5
3.0
8.5
7.5
5 10 PCT
T
11.8
31
15.8
1.338 2.7
.050
.811
2000
19.8
1.0
3.3
1.1
1.*
2.2
fa 25 PCT
T
29.7
78
23.1
.778 1.7
.051
.173
2000
18.b
1.8
3.b
2.*
8. b
7.1
7 10 PCT
T
105.5
277
19.5
•1b9 fa.2
.Obi
.285
2000
15.7
23. b
59.2
5b.3
27.1
38.b
8 2S PCT
T
2*.7
78
23.2
.781 1.8
.051
.175
2000
18.1
3.9
3.b
3.1
8.7
7.1
9 C.T.
0.0
0
10.3
R R
.013
R
2000
23.1
1.0
3.0
.7
7.1
0.0
1 25 pCT
T
28.2
71
23.5
.831 l.b
.051
.507
2000
18. b
b.1
3.b
2.b
8.8
7.0
2 55 PCT
T
b2. 8
lbS
32.8
.522 1.3
.057
.318
2000
17.5
27.7
lb.9
29.9
23.1
29.9
3 25 PCT
T
30.1
79
22.
•7bl 1.7
.051
.1b3
2000
18. b
5.0
3.5
3.0
8.5
7.5
* 10 PCT
T
11.8
31
15.8
1.338 2.7
.050
.811
2000
19.8
1.0
3.3
1.1
1.1
2.2
5 25 PCT
T-
29.7
78
23.1
.778 1.7
.051
.173
2000
18. b
1.8
3 . b
2."»
8.b
7.1
fa 90 PCT
T
105.5
277
19.5
•1b9 b.2
.Obi
.285
2000
15.7
23.b
59.2
Sb.3
27.1
38. b
7 25 PCT
T
2*.7
78
23.2
.781 1.8
.051
.175
2000
18,1
3.9
3.b
3.1
8.?
7.1
8 C.T.
0.0
0
10.3
R R
.013
R
2000
es.i
1.0
3.0
.7
7.1
0.0
9 IDLE
0.0
0
3.1
R R
.017
R
550
21.5
2b.b
3.3
.2
3.5
0.0
SUM
— (COMPOSITE VALUE FOR CYCLE 1)
1.3
21
5.7
SUM
(COMPOSITE VALUE FOR CYCLE 2)
1.3
21
S.7
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE
-
HC- FID 0.35(
1.3)
+ o.bsc
1
.3) a
1.295
G/KH
HR
.9bb
as)
CO- NDIR 0.35(
21.3)
~ O.bSC
21
.3) s
21.33b
G/KW
HR
18.11?
BS)
NOX-CL 0.35(
5.7)
~ O.bSC
5
.?) =
5.705
G/KM
HR
1.251
BS)
HC ~
NOX s
7.000
G/KN
HR
5.220
B9)
SFC a
.107
KG/KH
HR
. bb8
BS)
-------
TABLE F-15A. ENGINE 10 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1979
l RM29?
PROJECT
11-5044-
001
OS
> 01 71
TEST in
1-4
K= .
959 HUMS 9.2
G/KG
CONCENTRATION
AS MeA3UF
.973
11.54
7b3
15.534
7lb7
15
1124
13^
.077
.bl3
57.8bl
7.X50
X4.5
5
in PCT
T
1*7
• 59S
10.51
190
11.121
4990
7
539
27
.057
X.010
74.491
3.750
5.4
b
25 PCT
T
1?4
,84b
11.bb
790
12.550
?lb?
8
978
144
.077
,402
49,385
7.2b9
X4.8
7
90 PCT
T
fell
1.23b
12.HO
3012
13.70b
15b0*
79
5844
1U91
. X 13
X.Q81
39,09b
X5.00b
54,5
8
5S PCT
T
44
. 554
12.87
774
12.859
7484
3
b55
144
.077
, X4b
32,947
7,258
14.8
9
C.T.
4480
.152
8.17
87
8.80B
3175
175
1XX
10
. XH3
R
R
R
0.0
1
55 PCT
T
98
.708
11.90
755
12.bl9
7lb7
b
815
13b
.077
.322
41.833
7,027
14, 5
e
55 PCT
T
b52
1.181
IX.«»0
?5dO
13.155
1088b
bl
1975
b59
.X*?
X.3S8
*5.¥85
XS.lb9
32.*
3
85 PCT
T
b4
.H54
15.07
798
15.731
7215
4
748
144
.077
.5X0
38,523
7,409
X4.5
*
10 PCT
T
inB
.5b8
10.51
212
11.09|)
4990
5
51b
30
.057
,707
b7.779
3,98b
5,7
5
55 PCT
T
b4
,b79
IX."*0
773
12.58b
7031
4
7bb
137
.07?
,50b
39,45b
7,077
X4.5
b
^0 PCT
T
SbS
1.^78
12.07
5823
I3.bl5
l5R7b
74
3483
10*6
.XX3
X. 057
48,394
X4.5bX
53,7
?
55 PCT
T
35
.485
12.35
7B3
15.83*'
7257
5
554
XH1
.077
. X07
2S.092
7,399
X4.2
8
C.T.
4544
.15b
8.50
7b
R.849
30"4
175
110
8
. X43
R
R
R
0,0
9
IDLE
H9b0
.1)79
7.0b
55
8.100
998
118
50
5
.535
R
R
R
0,0
UNITS AS SPECIFIED IN THE 9-08-77 PROCEDURE 3FC CALC PERCENT OF TOTAL
MODE ID HP TO FC BSFC BSNOX F/A KG/KW HR RPM A/F HC CO NOX FUEL POWER
X
IDLE
0.0
n
3.3
R
P
.039
R
700
55.8
4b.8
.8
,*
5.2
0,0
2
?5 PCT
T
19.8
55
15.8
,798
b.5
.057
.485
5000
17. b
2.0
XO.l
3.8
8.3
7,2
3
55 PCT
T
44.2
lib
24.0
.543
X*.X
.Obo
.330
2000
Xb.b
X3.2
35, b
34,9
24,0
30,b
4
55 PCT
T
11.4
51
X 5.8
.R14
7.2
.057
.495
2000
X 7 , 5
X.O
8,4
X
8.3
7.X
5
10 PCT
T
7.2
19
11.0
X.520
3.8
.051
.925
20(10
X9.b
3,0
,b
*.3
x.i
b
25 PCT
T
19.8
52
X 5,8
.798
7.3
.057
.485
2000
X 7 , 5
.b
7,3
H.2
8.3
7.2
7
90 PCT
T
75,7
191
34,4
.*73
X5.0
. Ob5
.288
2000
Xb.O
9,4
31,3
*7,2
2b.4
38, 8
8
25 PCT
T
1*.B
52
lb.5
.833
7.3
.058
.507
2000
17,5
,2
4.9
* . 2
B.b
7.2
9
C.T.
0.0
U
7.0
R
R
.041
R
2000
24,5
2b.*
1.5
.5
b.B
0.0
1
25 PCT
T
19.4
51
15.8
.8X4
7.0
.057
,495
2000
17,4
.7
b . 5
*,0
8.4
7.2
2
55 PCT
T
43.4
114
24.0
.553
X5.2
.ObO
.33b
2000
lb.b
X2 . b
30,4
37,0
24.4
30.5
3
25 PCT
T
19.4
51
15.9
.819
7.4
.058
.498
2000
17.3
.»
b.O
*.2
8.5
7,5
*
10 PCT
T
?.b
51)
IX.0
X .444
4.0
.051
.879
2000
X9. 7
.*
3,1
,7
4.3
2.X
5
55 PCT
T
1 9.4
SJ
15.5
.798
7.1
.057
.485
2000
X 7, 4
b . 2
*.0
8.3
7,2
b
9o PCT
T
75.0
189
35,0
.48b
I * . b
.0b2
.2^
2000
Xb.l
XX.B
* X. 2
*5,3
27,*
38,9
7
?5 PCT
T
X'J.n
5»)
Xb.O
.841)
7.H
.058
.5X1
2U00
x7,a
.2
».s
».x
B.S
».o
8
C.T.
U.O
0
b.B
R
R
.041
R
8000
J4,b
X.b
.5
b.»
0,0
9
IDLE
n.n
0
2.2
R
R
.038
R
700
2b.4
38.8
.5
,2
3.5
0.0
SUM —-(COMPOSITE
value
FOR
CYCLE 1)
b.O
b5
Xb,
5
SUM (COMPOSITE
value
For
CYCLE 2)
4.5
bl
lb.
8
CYCLE COMPOSITE -
HC- FID 0.35(
b.O)
+
n.bs(
*.5}
s
5,059
G/KM
HR
C
3,773
BS)
CO- NDIR 0,35(
bS.O)
+
U.b5(
bl.3)
s
b2 .bOX
G/KW
HR
c
4b,b8X
B3)
NOX-CL 0.35(
X b , 5)
t
».b5(
Xfe.8)
s
X b.b99
G/KW
HR
c
12.453
BS)
HC
+ NOX
s
21.758
G/KW
HR
I
lb,225
BS)
SFC
=
.451
KG/KW
HR
(
,b93
BS)
-------
TABLE F-15B. ENGINE 10 NINE-MODE EMISSIONS RESULTS
1979 GM292 PROJECT 11
-50**-001
05 ni 79
TEST lll-S
K= .'
9b9 HUM= 9.5
G/KG
concentration
AS HEASUKED TOTAL
FUEL
CALCULATED G/HR
WT.
MODAL G/KWHR
MODE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOx-CL CARBON
G/HR
HC
CO
NOX
FACT.
hc-fid
CO NOX-CL
KW
1 IDLE
BOb*
.089
7.02
98 7.973
1 *0 b
152
32
b
.232
R
R R
0.0
2 ?5 PCT
T
3b2
1.1*5
10.59
705 11.*75
7031
25
1*17
139
.077
1.318
75.95b 7.***
13.9
3 55 PCT
T
131
1.385
10. *7
2311 11.959
10932
95
2S58
b?9
.1*7
2.219
59.978 15.927
31.8
* 25 PCT
T
11*
.998
10.*2
800 11.*39.
7lb7
13
12b3
1 b 1
.077
.708
bb.31* 8.*b5
1* . 2
5 in PCT
T
lb*
• bU5
9.bS
208 10.273
*7b3
8
5b7
31
.057
1.098
7*.*27 *.071
5.7
b 25 PCT
T
13b
.873
in.85
815 11.738
71b7
9
1077
1 bO
.077
.*85
Sb.SbO 8.*0*
1* • 2
7 9n PCT
T
b 1 *
l.b37
11.19
2975 12.89b
1 b2 39
87
*lb*
1205
.113
1.185
5b.950 lb.*7b
5*.5
8 25 PCT
T
MB
.575
11.19
823 11.771
7575
3
7*8
170
.077
.181
39.285 8.9*5
1*.2
9 C.T.
*992
.155
7.*5
80 8.1*3
2903
192
112
9
.1*3
R
R R
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
112
. 7b2
10.*0
79* 11.175
7lfe7
8
988
lb*
.077
.*18
51.873 8.bOO
i*.a
2 55 PCT
T
722
1.13*
10.51
2591 11.72*
10932
75
2135
777
.1*7
l.b93
*8.3*3 17.587
32. ««
3 ?5 PCT
T
72
.709
10.73
815 11.**7
7257
5
908
lbb
.077
. 2bb
*7.708 8.72b
1*. 2
* 10 PCT
T
lib
. 5b2
9.b5
207 10.22*
*b72
b
518
30
.057
.80b
71.b57 *.20*
5.*
S 25 PCT
T
70
. b99
10.9b
82b ll.bb?
7031
5
851
lbO
.077
.2*7
**.b9S 8.*07
1* . 2
b 10 PCT
T
53b
1.532
11.*2
2823 13.012
lbl*8
75
3839
1127
.113
1.021
52.510 15.*08
5*.5
7 ?5 °C T
T
35
.512
11.*2
B50 11.935
7303
2
b32
lb7
.077
.123
32.552 S.bll
1*.S
8 C.T.
**80
. 155
7.B5
79 8.*89
2858
lb3
105
9
.1*3
R
R R
0.0
9 IDLE
1(12*0
.07*
b.b*
53 7.808
l*Ob
197
27
3
.232
R
R R
0.0
•
UNITS AS
SPECIFIED IN
THE 9-08-77 PROCEDURE
SFC
CALC
m m m
HOOE 10
HP
Ta
FC
BSFC BSNOX
F/A
KG/KW HR
RPM
A/F
HC
CO
NOX FUEL
power
1 IDLE
0.0
il
3.1
R R
.037
R
700
2b. 8
38.9
.b
.* *.1
0.0
2 ?S PCT
T
18.7
*q
15.5
.831 7.*
.053
.505
2000
19.0
2.1
8.7
3.7 8.1
b . 9
3 55 PCT
T
*2.7
na
2*.l
.5b5 15.9
.055
.3**
2000
18.2
15.3
30.1
3*.b 2* . 0
30.1
* 85 PCT
T
11.0
5u
15.8
.830 8.5
.053
.505
2000
19.0
1.1
7.8
*.3 8.3
7.0
S 10 PCT
T
7.b
20
10.5
1.379 *.1
.0*7
.839
2000
21.2
.5
2 . b
.b *.1
2.1
b 25 PCT
T
19.n
5(1
15.8
.830 8.*
.05*
.505
2000
18. b
.8
b.b
*.3 8.3
7.0
7 90 PCT
T
73.1
192
35.8
.*90 lb.5
.059
.298
2000
lb.9
10.8
37.7
*7.1 27.5
39.7
8 25 PCT
T
19.0
50
lb.7
.877 8.9
.05*
.S3*
2000
18.b
.3
*.b
*.5 8.7
7.0
9 C.T.
0.0
0
b.*
R R
.038
R
2000
2b.*
30.2
1.3
.5 b.2
0.0
1 25 PCT
T
19.0
50
15. B
.830 8 . b
.051
.505
2000
19.5
.7
7.2
*.3 8.3
7.0
2 55 per
T
**.2
lib
2*.l
.5*b 17. b
.05*
.332
2000
18. b
12.2
29. b
38.b 2*.2
30.8
3 25 PCT
T
19. n
5(1
lb.O
.8*0 8.7
.052
.511
2000
19.1
.*
b.b
*.3 8.*
7.0
* 10 PCT
T
7.a
19
10.3
1.*2* *.2
.0*7
. 8bb
2000
21.3
.*
2.8
.b *.0
2.0
5 25 PCT
T
19.0
Sn
15.5
.81* R.*
.053
.*95
2000
18.7
.*
b • 2
*.2 8.1
7.0
b 90 PCT
T
73.1
192
35.b
.*87 15.*
.ObO
.29b
2000
lb.B
•».3
*1.0
*3.0 27.5
3^.2
7 25 PCT
T
19.*
51
lb. 1
.829 R . b
.05*
.50*
2000
18.*
.2
* . b
*.* 8.5
7.1
• C.T.
II. 0
n
h.l
ft A
.DM
K
»noo
II.1
*•.1
1.*
.* b.i
0.0
9 IDLE
0.0
n
3.1
R R
.037
ft
700
27.3
SO.b
.b
.2 *.9
0.0
8UH
— (COMPOSITE
value FOR CYCLE 1)
•
S.9
81
18.b
SUM
— (COMPOSITE
VALUE FOR CYCLE 2)—-—
5.8
b 7
18.8
TWO CYCLE
COMPOSITE -
HC- FID 0.35(
5.9)
~ n.b5(
5
.8) =
5.788
G/KW
HR I *.31b
BS)
CO- NOIR 0.35(
80.5)
~ 0. b S (
b7
.*) =
72.00b
G/KW
HR ( S3.b9S
B3)
NOX-CL 0.35(
18.b)
+ 0.b5(
1«
.8) =
18.7b0
G/KW
HR ( 13.989
BS)
HC ~
NOX =
2*.5*8
G/KW
HN ( 18.305
BS)
SFC =
.*2b
KG/KW
HR ( .700
BS)
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Inunctions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA 460/3-81-0 31
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOt^NO.
4. TITLE ANO SUBTITLE
EMISSIONS FROM HEAVY-DUTY ENGINES USING THE
1984 TRANSIENT TEST PROCEDURE VOLUME I-GASOLINE
5. REPORT DATE
Julv 1981
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Sherrill F. Martin
Charles M. Urban
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORG -VNIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2603
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report 9-77/7-81
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This volume of the two-volume report describes the heavy-duty, gasoline engine
baseline emissions evaluations conducted at Southwest Research Institute.
Initially, a facility was developed which was capable of complying with the
requirements in the 1984 dynamometer transient procedure. Seventeen gasoline
engines were.then tested over the transient and the nine-mode emissions test
procedures. Included were 1969 model year engines for HC baseline, 1972-73
engines for N0X baseline, and 1978-79 engines for correlation purposes.
Emissions measured were hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen
on all engines.
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIF1 ERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. cosati Held/Group
Exhaust Emissions
Spark Ignition Engines
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Nitrogen Oxides
Heavy-Duty Engines
Emissions Test Procedure
Transient Cycle Emission
Tests
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. of PAGES
270
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |