PB 264 804
EPA-600/3-77-034
March 1977
TOXICITY OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCB's)
TO FISH AND OTHER AQUATIC LIFE
by
Alan V. Nebeker
Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth
Western Fish Toxicology Station*
Corvallis, Oregon 97330
Frank A. Puglisi
David L. DeFoe
Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota 55804
*now a field station of the Corvallis Environmental
Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon 97330)
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY-DULUTH
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DULUTH, MINNESOTA 55804

-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Research
Laboratory-Duluth, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved
for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does
not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
ii

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Summary of Findings (Abstract) 	 ....	vili
Introduction 					1
Monitoring PCB's in Bioassay Systems 		3
Methods and Materials 		6
Analytical Methods 	 	 6
Physical Testing Methods 		12
Biological Testing Methods			l'i
Analytical Results 		19
Biological Results 		24
Daphnia Static Tests 		24
Daphnia Continuous-flow Tests 		27
Fathead minnow 		35
Jordanella	53
Gamma 		55
Midges	62
Discussion		64
Acknowledgments			.70
Literature Cited 		71
ill

-------
FIGURE
Single peak used as reference for quantitation of
Aroclors 1242, 1248, and 1254 	
iv

-------
TABLES
Page
1.	Chemical parameters monitored in Lake Superior
test water		 11
2.	Percent recovery of aroclor compounds during
extraction from test water	¦	20
3.	Comparison of nominal and measured concentrations
of Aroclor 1242 	21
4.	Comparison of nominal and measured concentrations
of Aroclor 1248 	22
5.	Comparison of nominal and measured concentrations
of Aroclor 1254 	23
6.	The comparative toxicity of eight PCB's (in pg/liter)
to Daphnia magna in Lake Superior water as determined
in static conditions			25
7.	Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 3-weeks
exposure to various percentages of a P'CB mixture of 16
percent impairment concentrations	26
8.	Calculated 2- apd 3-week LC50 values, and 50 percent and
16 percent reproductive impairment for Daphnia magna
subjected to Aroclor 1248 and Aroclor 1254 in continuous-
flow conditions	28
9.	Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 2-weeks
exposure to Aroclor 1248 	29
10.	Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 2-weeks
exposure to Aroclor 1254 	30
11.	Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 3-weeks
exposure to Aroclor 1254 	31
12.	Summary of survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna
after 2-weeks exposure to Aroclor 1248 	32
13.	Summary of survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna
after 2-weeks exposure to Aroclor 1254 	33
V

-------
14.	Summary of survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna
after 3-weeks exposure to Aroclor 1254 	 34
15.	Survival of fathead minnows at various time intervals
(Aroclor 1242)		 38
16.	Mean terminal weight of fathead minnows (Aroclor 1242) ... 39
17.	Growth (length) of fathead minnows (Aroclor 1242) ...... 40
18.	Spawning results and egg production of the fathead
minnow (Aroclor 1242) 	 41
19.	Egg hatchability and fry survival of the fathead
minnow (Aroclor 1242) 	 42
20.	Egg hatchability and fry survival of eggs produced
by control fathead minnows but maintained in higher
PCB concentrations (Aroclor 1242) ... 	 43
21.	Results of 30-day growth and survival study of young
fathead minnows (Aroclor 1242) 	 44
22.	Survival of fathead n.innows at various time Intervals
(Aroclor 1254) ......... 	 45
23.	Mean terminal weight of fathead minnows (Aroclor 1254) ... 46
24.	Growth (length) of fathead minnows (Aroclor 1254) 	 47
25.	Spawning results and egg production of the fathead
minnow (Aroclor 1254)			 48
26.	Egg hatchability and fry survival of the fathead
minnow (Aroclor 1254) 	 49
27.	Egg hatchability and fry survival of eggs produced by
control fathead minnows but maintained in higher PCB
concentrations (Aroclor 1254) 	 50
28.	Results of 30-day growth and survival study of young
fathead minnows (Aroclor 1254) 	 51
29.	Results of 30-day survival and growth study of newly
hatched fathead minnows (Aroclor 1248) 	 52
30.	Results of 40-day survival and growth study of newly
hatched Jordanella floridae (Aroclor 1248) 	 ... 54
vi

-------
31.	Calculated 96-hour LC50 values for Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
subjected to Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1248	 56
32.	Survival and reproduction of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
after 2-months exposure to Aroclor 1242 . . . . . 		 i-7
33.	Survival and reproduction of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
after 2-months exposure to Aroclor 1248 		 58
34.	Summary of survival and reproduction of Gammarus
pseudolimnaeus after 2-months exposure to Aroclor 1242 ... 59
35.	Summary of survival and reproduction of Gammarus
pseudolimnaeus after 2 months exposure to Aroclor 1248 ... 60
35a. Gammarus chronic (1248) - statistical treatment of
Table 35	 61
36.	Effect of Aroclor 1254 on the growth and survival of
the midge Tanytarsus dissimilis 	 63
vii

-------
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (ABSTRACT)
Aroclor 1248 was the most toxic of the eight aroclors tested to
Daphnia magna in static tests, with a 3-wcek LC50 of 25 pg/liter. Aroclor
1254 was most toxic under continuous-flow conditions v/ith a 3-week LC50
of 1.3 i.ig/liter. The Aroclors were much more toxic under continuous-flow
than static conditions, with 16 percent impairment of reproduction by
Aroclor 1248 occurring at 1.0 pg/liter.
Calculated 96-hour LC50 values for newly-hatched fathead minnows
were 7.7 pg/1 for Aroclor 1254 and 15 pg/1 for '1242. Three-month-old
fatheads had a 96-hour LC50 of ca. 300 ng/1 for 1242. Reproduction
occurred at and below 1.8 pg/1 1254 and at and below 5.4 pg/1 1242.
Polychlorinated biphenyls were acutely toxic but exhibited much greater
chronic toxicity at very low levels, due to their cumulative nature.
Newly hatched young were the most sensitive life stage. Young fathead
growth was also affected above 2.2 pg/1 1248 and none survived above
5.1 pg/1 after 30 days. Young flagfish, Jordanella floridae, did not
survive above 5.1 pg/1 1248 and did not grow well above 2.2 pg/1.
Ninety-six hour LC50 values for Aroclor 1242 and 1248 with Gammarus
pseudolimnaeus were 73 and 29 pg/liter. Survival after 30 days was
53 percent at 8.7 pg/1 1242 and 52 percent at 5.1 pg/1 1248. Good
reproduction and survival of young occurred at 2.8 pg/1 1242 and 2.2
pg/1 1248.
viii

-------
Abundant adult emergence of the midge Tanytarsus dissimilis
did not occur above 5 Mg/1 1240 or 3,5 pg/1 1254. The calculated
3-week LC50 (50 percent reduction based on control as 100 percent)
for Aroclor 1254 was .65 pg/1 for larvae and .45 pg/1 for pupae.
Application factors of 0.10 for 1242 and 0.15 for 1248 were calculated
for the PCB's and Gammarus. Application factors of 0.2 for 1254 and
0.16 for 1242 were calculated for fathead minnows using newly hatched
fish to obtain the 96-hour LC50.
ix

-------
INTRODUCTION
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) have been shown to be widespread
in the environment, rivaling DDT in general occurrence (Risebrough and
Bodine, 1970). Their significance in the aquatic environment as a
poison is now being revealed. Duke, Lowe, and Wilson (1970) have
documented the occurrence of one of the many PCB mixtures (Aroclor 1254)
in the water, sediment, and biota of Escambia Bay, Florida, Veith
and Lee (1970) reviewed the chlorinated biphenyl contamination in
natural waters and stated that the PCB's may be one of the more
widespread contaminants. A general review of the structural and physical
properties, uses, analytical methods of analysis, levels found in nature,
and toxicology of PCB's can be found in the paper by Peakall and Lincer
(1970).
Polychlorinated biphenyl compounds are just one of many exotic
chemicals now finding their way into our waterways. They are being
detected in fish and other aquatic life at levels much higher than
concentrations found in the water. Because of the only recent availability
of analytical methodology for detecting and identifying low levels of
PCB's in water and aquatic organisms little is known about their
interactions.
The acute toxicity of some of the many types of PCB's produced
commercially (Monsanto Chemical Co.) has been demonstrated for a few
species of fish, and fish food organisms, such as shrimp, scuds, and
aquatic insects (Zitco, 1970; Stalling, 1970; Wildish, 1970; Saunders,
in press; Duke, et al., 1970). Little information is currently available

-------
2
on the chronic effects of PCD on the full life cycles of aquatic animals.
The toxicity of these materials must be known so that proper safeguards
can bo established for preventing further contamination of our waterways
and for protecting the complex biological balance that must be
maintained in our streams ar/l lakes.
In order to assess the danger of those compounds to fish and fisii
food organisms this laboratory designed and conducted bioassays using
Daphnia magna, the fathead minnow Pinephales promelas, the flagfish
Jordanella floridaa, the scud Gammarus pscudolimnaeus, and the mi doe
Tanytarsus dissimilis, using commercially available PCB mixtures (Aroclor
1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, 1254, 1200, 12G2, and 1263). Seven continuous-
flow bioassays using Aroclor 1248 and 1254, twenty-four 3-week static
bioassays using all eight Aroclors, and 3 PCB mixture bioassays were
conducted with Daphnia manna using survival and reproductive success
as the measure of toxicity. Aroclor 1242, 1248, and 1254 wen. utilized
to determine their effect on the survival and growth of young fathead
minnows and Jordanella. In depth studies were conducted to determine
the effects of the two PCB's 1242 and 1254 on growth and maturation,
egg production, egg hatch, and young production and survival of the
fathead minnow. This study also determined the effects of Aroclor 1242
and 1248 on the growth, survival and reproduction of Gammarus, and the
effects of 1248 and 1254 on the growth, survival, and adult emergence
of the midge T. dissimilis.

-------
3
MONITORING PCB's IN BIOASSAY SYSTEMS
Introduction
Since Jensen (1966) identified Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's)
in animal tissue concern has mounted as to their hazard in the environment.
Several PCB reviews by Risebrough, et al. (1969), Peakall and Lincer (1970)
and Veith and Lee (1970) report PCB's being found in water, sediment,
fish, birds, and mammals including humans. Their discussion of physical
and chemical properties point out the difficulties present in the
available methods of analysis.
The low solubility of PCB compounds in water caused some
difficulties when the experiments required high starting concentrations.
Zitko (1970) found that by adding a nonionic surfactant to the PCB's he
could increase the dosing level in his experiments. We used this method
during preliminary experiments with Daphnia but found the toxicant level
higher than needed and discontinued using the surfactant in the remaining
bioassays.
Reynolds (1969) pointed out that PCB's caused interference with
pesticide residue analysis and many residue chemists found that they
had been erroneously reporting high levels of chlorinated pesticides
because of this. The fact that PCB's can be isolated with chlorinated
pesticides gave us a starting point for developing a PCB monitoring
procedure. The F. D. A. Pesticide Analytical Manual (1968) has a
method for chlorinated pesticide residue analysis that was adaptable
to our needs. Briefly, the method calls for an extraction, acetonitrile
partitioning, florisil column cleanup and then Injection into a gas

-------
4
chromatograph (G. C.). However, after the Florisil cleanup the PCB's
and pesticides have been jointly isolated and need further separation
before the G. C. step.
Separation can be achieved by a reaction to alter or destroy the
pesticides, leaving the PCB's, or by physically isolating one from the
other. The reactions include saponification, reported by Risebrough,
ot al. (1968), which will dchydrohalogenate triany of the pesticides
but not PCB's; and a mild nitration also reported by Risebrough, et al.
(1969),	at 0° C which will also react with pesticides and not PCB's.
Reynolds (1969) and Amour and Burke (1969) attempted to repeat the
nitration procedure but found complex chromatographs that couldn't be
related to the untreated residue.
Physical separation was accomplished by Reynolds (1969) using an
activated Florisil column and eluding with n-hexane instead of the
n-hexane-ethyl ether used for the pesticide cleanup. Armour and Burke
(1970)	achieved ? similar separation using a silicic acid-celite column
and eluding the PCB's with petroleum ether. In both the chemical and
physical methods of separation several pesticides are still isolated
with the PCB's which have to be corrected for later in the analysis.
Identifying the PCB mixture in the sample is usually done by G. C.
using an electron capture detector and comparing the chromatograph with
chromatographs of "standard" commercial mixtures.
Quantitative interpretations of the chromatograph are as numerous
as there are investigators using them.

-------
5
Koeman, et al (1969) semiquantitated residues from tost animals
by using one of the peaks of the "pure" PCB toxicant as an internal
standard. Risebrough, et al. (1969), using electron capture, assumed
each PCB compound produced the same peak height as an equal amount of
PP-DDE. The total of the summed peak heights was multiplied by a
correction factor derived from similar measurements of standard
solutions using electron capture and microcoulometric detectors.
Jensen et al. (1969) estimated total PCB's by summing all PCB components
based on combined data from Mass Spectrometry (M. S.), and electron
capture and microcoulometric detection. The F. D. A. Pesticide
Analytical Manual (1968) has methods for multiple component pesticides
such as toxaphene that compares the total of peak heights or areas with
the same measurement on a standard of that mixture. A number of other
methods include variations or combinations of the above methods but,
in all cases there is some question as to how quantitative these results
are. Most investigators agree that until the individual compounds are
isolated and quantitated with their individual standard any result will
be no better than semiquantitative.

-------
6
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Analytical Methods
Static Daphnia tests. -- Tost solutions were prepared by weighing
the Aroclor samples using an analytical balance and transferring them
to volumetric flasks with acetone and triton x-100, a surfactant
(maintained at .03 x PCB level) added to help keep the PCB's in
'solution*. The concentrations of acetone and triton X-100 used were
tested previously and found to be non-toxic at the levels used during
testing. The Triton-PCB mixtures were diluted to 500 ml with acetone
and used as stock solutions. Portions of each :tock solution were diluted
with acetone to give 5 different working stock solutions for each Aroclor.
One ml of each working-stock solution and one ml of food suspension were
pipetted into a volumetric flask and diluted to 1000 ml with Lake Superior
water. Control solutions were prepared with one ml of acetone and one
ml of food suspension in a liter of lake water to keep the acetone
concentration constant (lml/Iiter) in all test solutions.
Static tests to determine the effect of various PCB mixtures were
also conducted with Daphnia magna. A mixed solution containing that
concentration of each Aroclor which permitted reproduction, but reduced
it be 16 percent, was used for these tests.
Various percentages of the mixture were then tested. The mixture
consisted of the following concentrations (in ng/Hter): Aroclor 1221 a 87,
1232 = 53, 1242 = 48, 1248 » 16, 1254 = 18, 1260 » 22, 1262 = 24, and
1268 ¦ 162.

-------
7
Continuous-flow Tests. -- Aroclor 1242, 1240, and 1254, manufactured by
Monsanto Chemical Company, were the Polychlorinated Biphenyl mixtures
used. The stock solutions were prepared by v/eighing the PCB mixture
and dissolving it in acetone. The toxicant levels were maintained in
the flowing system by the Mount diluter. The toxicant was introduced
into the diluter system as an acetone solution with a glass syringe
mounted in a mechanical injecter.
Six liters of test water were collected for analysis from each
test concentration to be sampled. Three liters were siphoned into
each of two one-gallon glass bottles, fitted with teflon lined screw
caps, to provide duplicate samples. A duplicate of the control and at
least one other sample were spiked with equal amounts of the toxicant
being used in the system. Ten ml of concentrated sulfuric acid and
300 ml of glass distilled methylene chloride were added to each sample.
The samples were shaken to relieve any pressure. The caps were tightened
and the bottles placed on a mechanical shaker for ten minutes. The
samples were allowed to settle at least 10 minutes before decanting
the aqueous phase off. The organic phase and remaining water were
transferred to a scparatory funnel and again allowed to settle. The
organic layer was drained through solvent washed anhydrous sodium
sulfate into a Kunderna-Danish Evaporator. The solvent was evaporated
on a steam bath until the entire sample was contained in the ten ml
evaporator receiver. The remaining solvent was evaporated by blowing
a gentle stream of dry nitrogen over it until the first sign of dryness.
The receiver was stoppered with a cork wrapped in acctone-washed
aluminum foil and stored for G. C. analysis.

-------
8
Analysis was done on a Tracor MT-220 gas chromatograph using a
six foot 1/4 inch 0. D. glass column packed with 3 percent 0V-1 on
chrotnosorb W 80/90 mesh. A Coulson Conductivity Detector was used
in the reductive mode without a catalyst. Sixty ml/min Helium carrier
gas was used with a 10 ml/inin Helium purge through the furnace when
the column was vented. Forty ml/min of electrolytic hydrogen were
used for the reductive pyrolysis. The temperatures of the inlet and
all transfer lines were kept at 260° C and the column varied from 195° C
to 205° C depending on the PCB mixture being measured. The pyrolysis
furnace was kept at 820° C.
The residue was dissolved in a volume of n-hexane that would give
a concentration such that a 50 microliter injection would give at least
25 percent scale response on a one millivolt chart recorder. The solvent
was vented to prevent it from contaminating the furnace.
A single well defined peak (Figure 1), present in all three of the
PCB mixtures tested, was used as an internal standard and was compared
to the same peak in the "standard". This "quantitation" was done by
alternately injecting standards and samples making sure the standards
response (peak height) bracketed the response of the sample injected
between them. The responses were plotted on linear graph paper and the
unknown quantity taken from the plot. The calculated concentrations were
corrected for recovery by using the ratio of the difference between the
spiked and unspiked duplicate samples to the size of the spike. Mean
measured concentrations were used for all calculations of biological data.

-------
1-4 minutes ^
1242
ISOTHERMAL
195* C
1254
ISOTHERMAL
205* C
1248
ISOTHERMAL
200' C
BASE
BASE
BASE
INJECT
REFERENCE
PEAK
REFERENCE
PEAK
REFERENCE
PEAK
INJECT
INJECT
Fig. 1. Single peak used as reference for quantitation of Aroclors 1242, 1248, 1254.
to

-------
10
Chemical parameters of the Lake Superior test water that were
monitored are listed in Table 1. The weekly measurements were made
using the methods from Standard Methods (1965). The dissolved oxygen
was measured in the tanks using the azide modification of the winkler
method.

-------
11
Table 1. Chemical Parameters Monitored in Lake Superior Test Water
Parameter
Ranqe
pf! 7.5 - 8.0
Acidity
2.4 - 4.0 ppm
Alkalinity
40 - 43 ppm
Calcium hardness
34 - 36 ppm
Total hardness	44 - 46 ppm

-------
12
Physical Testing Methods
Daphnia Static Tests. -- Test containers were 250 ml glass beakers
which were randomly distributed and covered with glass sheets to minimize
evaporation. The experiments were conducted at 18 + 1° C and a photoperiod
set for 16 hours light per day.
Continuous-Flow Tests. — Daphnia were also tested under continuous
flow conditions. The fish, Gammarus, and midges were tested only under
continuous-flow conditions.
Four complete testing units were utilized, each consisting of five
duplicated test concentrations and a control. Stainless steel and glass
aquaria were used for all test chambers. Twelve ten-gallon aquaria were
used for adult fish in the Aroclor 1254 testing; twelve five-gallon aquaria
were utilized for Aroclor 1242 testing; and twenty-four 2 1/2 gallon
aquaria were used for testing Daphnia, Gammarus, midges, Jordanella,
and some young fathead minnows. Five and 2 1/2 gallon aquaria were used
for testing young fish obtained from spawning tanks. Four proportional
diluters (Mount and Brungs, 1967) were used to provide the necessary
continuous-flow conditions during testing (Figure 2). A modification
of the diluter system using a gas-syringe filled with acetone and PCB
(no Triton X-100) was utilized with an injector system to deliver the
toxicant to the mixing chamber of the diluter (Figure 3). Additional
agitation was maintained by circulating the mixing box contents through
a submersible pump. Additional mixing boxes, with 2-way and 4-way
splits to the duplicate and quadruplicate test aquaria provided further

-------
13
mixing of the PCB solutions. All tanks were randomly distributed on
the test tables. Raw Lake Superior water was utilized for all testing.
The diluters delivered 350 ml (fish tests), 200 ml (fish tests),
and 150 ml (Gammarus tests) to each test tank every 3 minutes, with flow
rates maintained primarily to ensure adequate dissolved oxygen levels
and replenishment of fresh toxic solutions. These flow rates ensured a
complete exchange of water in the test tanks about every 4-5 hours. All
fish testing tanks were cleaned daily with excess algae or fungus growth
scraped away weekly.
Spawning substrates for fathead minnows consisted of inverted
longitudinal sections of glass quart beverage bottles, cut to three
inches in length. For the hatchability studies the egg cups used to
hold eggs until hatching were constructed of 2-inch 0D round glass jars
with the bottoms cut off. The bottom of the jar was covered with fine
stainless steel screen. The cups were hung, partially submersed in
the test aquaria and slowly oscillated by means of a rocker arm apparatus
(Figure 2) driven by a small electric motor.
Test temperatures were maintained at 24 ± 1° C for the f1sh tests
and 18 + 1° c for the Oaphnia, midge and Gammarus testing. Durotest
(Optima FS) and wide spectrum Grow-lux fluorescent tubes provided light
for the tests. The photoperiod of Evansvllle, Indiana, was maintained
during testing, with the adjustments in day-length made every two weeks.

-------
14
Biological Testing Methods
Daphnia static Tests. — Daphnia magna, obtained from the National
Water Quality Laboratory cultures, were tested from young less than 24
hours old, through maturation, reproduction and growth of their young
(3 weeks). Five animals were placed in a 250 ml beaker containing 200
ml of test solution with four replicates of each concentration, giving
20 animals at each concentration. The survival of the original animals
was recorded and test solutions renewed each week. The young surviving
after two weeks were counted and discarded. Young surviving after the
third week were also counted and the total young surviving was recorded.
All animals were counted and transferred to fresh solutions each week in
modified eyedroppers. All tests were repeated three times.
The 3-week LC50, that concentration at which 50 percent of the
*
animals had died after 3 weeks, was used as one measure of toxicity.
Fifty percent and sixteen percent reproductive impairment were also
used as a measure of reproductive success (Biesinger and Christensen,
1972). This is defined as survival of young as a percentage of the
controls or of that test chamber which had the highest number of
young produced. The LC50, 50 percent and 16 percent reproductive
impairment figures, and 95 percent confident limits for each, were
determined using the statistical method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon
(1949). The terminology recommended by Sprague (1969) was used to
present toxicity data.

-------
15
Daphnia Static Mixture Tests. — Various percentages of the PCB
mixtures were tested to determine what type of survival would occur if
all the PCB * s were in an aquatic system at these low levels which do
permit reproduction. Testing was conducted as with previous Daphnia
statics and 50 percent survival and 50 percent and 16 percent reproductive
impairment were also calculated as done previously.
Food for the Daphnia was prepared by mixing 0.5 grams powdered
dried wheat leave., and 10 grains enriched trout food (fry granules) in
a blender with 300 ml of Lake Superior water (Biesinger and Christensen,
1972).
Daphnia Continuous-Flow Tests. -- Five animals, less than 24
hours old, were placed in two-gallon (7.6 liter) aquaria, with four
replicates of each concentration, giving 20 animals at each concentration.
All surviving origiral Daphnia, and their young, were counted at the
end of each 2 or 3 week test. Analysis of data and physical-chemical
conditions were the same as that for the static tests; however, the
animals were fed finely powdered fish food twice a day rather than the
solution given to the animals in static tests. Measured PCB concentrations
from the continuous-flow tests were used for all calculations.
Fathead Minnow and Oordanella floridae. — All fish wereobtained
from stocks at the National Water Quality Laboratory, in Duluth, MN.
Ninety-six hour acute tests with various ages of fish were conducted
according to Standard Methods (1965) to obtain information, together
with the chronic tests, for calculating application factors. Measured
PCB concentrations were used for all calculations.

-------
16
Full life-cycle studies with the fathead minnows, and the tests
with Jordanella. were started with newly hatched young (< 24 hours old).
The tests with Jordanella consisted of daily survival observations, with
growth measurements at termination of the test after 30 days. Young
fathead minnows were tested in the same diluter system, but different
tanks, during the same time to get comparative information on the two
species.
Fathead full life-cycle testing was begun with 20 newly hatched
young in each aquarium, giving 40 animals per concentration. They were
fed twice daily with newly hatched live brine shrimp, frozen brine shrimp,
Daphnia. and dry and frozen commerical fish foods. Growth of the fish
was measured photographically (McKim and Benoit, 1971) at 50 and 90 days
and at the end of the test. Prior to sexual maturation five spawning
substrates were placed in the aquaria and the fish were thinned to leave
ten fish per tank. The fish that were removed were used in studies to
determine effects of PCB's on ATPase activity (Cutkomp and Koch, in press).
Eggs laid on the spawning substrates were removed, counted and placed
in egg cups for hatchability testing. Twenty-five of fifty eggs were
placed in cups and number hatched recorded. Some of the newly-hatched
fish were transferred to smaller test aquaria at the same concentrations
and held for 30 days to determine survival and growth.
Gammarus tests. -- Juvenile scuds, Gammarus pseudolimnaeus, were
obtained from the Eau Claire River (Wisconsin), and were held in the
laboratory for at least a week prior to testing. Twenty animals were

-------
17
placed in each tank, with two (1242 test) and three (1248 test) tanks
for each PCB concentration, giving 40 (1242) and 60 (1248) scuds in
each concentration.
They were fed a combination of well-soaked maple and aspen leaves,
dry commercial fish food, and algae, which was permitted to grow on
the test tanks prior to introduction of the scuds. The total length
of the scud tests was two months; they were tested as juveniles and
held under test conditons until they coupled and reproduced (one
month). Reproduction was allowed to continue for one month before the
test was terminated. The adults were counted and young counted and
weighed.
Midge Tests. -- The test species was Tanytarsus dissimilis.
The midges occur as "guests" in most tests systems in the laboratory,
and its original source is unknown.
The midges were reared in extra tanks in the test room so an
abundance of egg carrying females were flying in the room at all times.
These females deposited eggs in all clean test tanks when the test v/as
started and within a few hours all tanks contained larve. As this was
a continuing random ovipositing pattern an abundant supply of young
midges was available. The occurrence of mature midge cases and pupal
cases which the growing larvae constructed were utilized as a measure
of growth and survival. The additional occurrence of pupae and cast
pupal skins at the water surface indicated that, adult emergence was or
was not successful.

-------
The test period was 3 weeks", at the end of this period all
mature larval cases and pupal cases were counted. Test tanks were
observed daily to determine if successful adult emergence was
occurring. This procedure was useful under the particular conditions
of these tests but is not recommended as a routine method.

-------
19
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Extraction efficiencies of this method are shown in Table 2. These
recovery values based on the single peak evaluation, referred to above,
show little difference in the Aroclors. This would Indicate that the
extraction of the compound represented by the peak may be only slightly
affected by the other compounds present.
The variability of this method on duplicate samples regardless of
concentration or toxicant is less than 10 percent. The variability of
6. C. Injection was less than 5 percent for duplicate Injections of the
standard or the same residue and up to 10 percent for different size
injections of the same residue.
Tables 3, 4, and 5 show the comparison of nominal and measured
concentrations. Comparing the percent nominal values for any series
of dilutions gives some indication of how well that diluter system was
working. It can be seen that except for a few high values the systems
were working well.

-------
20
Table 2. Percent Recovery of Aroclor Compounds During Extraction from
Test Water

Aroclor
1242
1248
1254
Mean
89
86
82
Standard
deviation
5
8
7
Range
81-96
71-98
71-96
Number
of samples
12
23
18

-------
Table 3. Comparison of Nominal and Measured Concentrations of Aroclor 1242.

Test
Nominal
Cone.
Mean
Measured
Cone.
Standard
Deviation
Ranqe
Mean
Percent of
Nominal
Number
of
Samples
Total
Samples
I
300
100
33
11
3.5
234
81
26*
8.7*
2.8*
13
7.4
210-250
75-89
78
81
8
3
11
75
51
7.6
39-58
68
6
25
15
2.3
13-19
61
6
8.3
5.4
1.3
3.9-7.3
65
14
2.8
2.9
.90
1.5-4.4
105
11
.93
.86
.32**
.52-1.2
93
2
		39
I and II	50
* Calculated - based on mean percent (of nominal) recovery.
** This value 1s 1/2 the range.

-------
Table 4. Comparison of Nominal and Measured Concentrations of Aroclor 7243.


Mean


Mean
Number


Nominal
Measured
Standard

Percent of
of
Total
Test
Cone.
Cone.
Deviation
Ranqe
Nominal
Samples
Samples
I
75
40
6.2
34-48
53
4


25
14
4.1
9.1-17
54
4


8.3
5.8
.25**
5.5-6.0
69
2


.93
.37
.02**
.35-.39
40
2
12
II
30
18
1.5
17-21
61
5


10
5.1
3.0
2.6-6.7
51
10


3.3
2.2
.30
1.7-2.6
65
9


1.1
.54
.096
.47-.65
49
3


.37
.18
.021
.16-.20
50
3
30
III
20.0
7.5*



.


6.7
2.5
.18
2.3-2.8
37
6


2.2
.86
.31
.51-1.3
39
5


.74
.26
.12
.10-.37
36
4


.25
.10
—

— —
—
15
I. II,
and III





57
* Calculated - based on meari percent (of nominal) recovery.
** These values are 1/2 the range.

-------
Table 5. Comparison of Nominal and Measured Concentrations of Aroclor 1254.


Mean


Mean
Number


Nominal
Measured
Standard

Percent of
of
Total
Test
Cone.
Cone.
Deviation
Ranqe
Nominal
Samples
Samples
I
100
33


33
1


33
9.0
.35**
8.6-9.3
27
2


11
3.5
.60
2.9-4.1
32
2


3.7*
1.2*
—
--
--
-


1.2
.45
— —
— —
38
1
6
II
30
9.0
.44
8.7-9.5
30
3


10
3.8
.58
3.5-4.5
38
3


3.3
1.7
--
—
51
1


1.1
.92
--
—
84
1


.37*
——
——
—-

-
8
III
25
15
2.5
12-17
58
2


8.3
4.6
.68
3.6-5.7
55
14


2.8
1.8
.29
1.4-2.2
62
15


.93
.52
.12
.38-.69
58
8


.31
.23
.02**
.21-.25
75
2
41
I, II,
and III





55
* Calculated - based on mean percent (of nominal) recovery.
** These values are 1/2 the range.

-------
24
BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
Daplwia Static Tests
Aroclor 1248 was most toxic to Daphnia with a 3-week LC50 of
25 yg/liter. Fifty percent reproductive impairment occurred at 24 pg/1,
with 16 percent impairment at 16 yg/1. The toxicity of the other PCB's
progressively decreased (Table 6) from 1248 to 1221 and from 1248 to
1268. The Aroclors 1254, 1260, and 1262 were nearly as toxic as 1248,
with 1242 and 1232 being about 1/2 as toxic. Aroclor 1221 was much less
toxic with an LC50 of 180 yg/1. The least toxic was 1268, with an LC50
of 253 yg/1 (Table 6).
In all tests reproduction, as judged by the number of young produced,
was the most sensitive indicator of toxicity. Values for 50 percent
reproductive impairment of all PCB's tested v/ere lower (Table 6) than
the LC50 for survival. The confidence limits however, indicate that
they are not significantly different except for 1221 and 1268.
No survival or reproduction occurred at 40 percent of the PCB mixture
after three weeks. At 20 percent of the mixture there was 17 percent
adult survival and 13 percent young survival (Table 7). Fifty percent
of the adults survived at 15 percent of the mixture. Young survival
was reduced to 50 percent at 14 percent of the mixture, with 16 percent
reproductive impairment occurring at 11 percent of the mixture. Good
survival, growth, and reproduction occurred at and below 5 percent of the
mixture. The toxicity of the separate PCB's appears to be additive
under the conditions of these tests.

-------
25
Table 6. The Comparative Toxicity of Eight Aroclors3 (in yg/liter)
to Daphnia magna in Lake Superior Water as Determined
in Static Test Conditions





Reproductive Impairment

Three Wee';
Confidence

Confidence Confidence
Aroclor
LC50
Limits
50%
Limits 1635 Limits
1221
180
158-205
125
116-135
89
85.6-92.6
1232
72
62.6-82.8
66
60-72.6
53
50.5-55.7
1242
67
55.4-81
63
56.3-70.5
48
45.2-50.9
1248
25
21 .4-29.2
24
21.2-27.1
16
13.9-18.4
1254
31
25.8-37.2
28
23.1-33.9
18
14.5-22.3
1260
36
27.7-46.8
33
27.5-39.6
22
17.7-27.3
1262
43
37-49.9
41
33-53.3
24
17.6-32.6
1268
253
222-288
206
185-228
162
146-179
aPolych1orinated Biphenyls: Aroclor 1221-1268. Monsanto Chemical Company, St. Louis, Ho
^Ninety-five percent confidence limits.

-------
Table 7. Survival and Reproduction of Daphnia magna After 3 Weeks' Exposure to Various Percentages
of a PCB Mixture of 16% Impairment Concentrations^.
Percent
Initial
Number
Adults A1ive
at End of Test
Mean
Percent
Total
Young
Produced
Mean Young
Produced as
of
Mixture^
of
Animals
Test
1
Test
2
Test
3
Survival
of Adults
Test
1
Test
2
Test
3
Percent
3
of Control
40%
20
0
0
0
0%
0
0
0
0%
20%
20
2
8
0
17%
80
152
68
13%
10%
20
16
20
20
93%
554
792
631
87%
5%
20
18
20
20
97%
690
795
804
100%
12
20
14
19
19
87%
425
670
668
77%
0.5%
20
15
20
20
92%
566
871
701
94%
0.0%
Control
20
17
18
20
92%
688
757
836
99.5%
^ That concentration which permitted reproduction but reduced it by 16%, for each Aroclor, was added together. Various
percentages of the mixture were then tested.
^ Mixture consisted of the following concentrations (in yg/liter): 1221 = 87, 1232 = 53, 1242 = 48, 1248 = 16,
1254 = 18, 1260 = 22, 1262 = 24, and 1268 = 162.
Percent decrease from the highest young produced in either the controls or one of the lower tested toxicant levels.
ro
cn

-------
Daphnia Continuous-Flow Tests
Aroclor 1254 was most toxic to Daphnia under continuous-flow
test conditions. There was no significant difference between the
two-week LC50 of 1.8 yg/liter and the three-week LC50 of 1.3 yg/liter
(Table 8). Reproductive impairment occurred at or just below those
levels which prevented survival of the adults. Aroclor 1248 killed
50 percent of the adult Daphnia at 2.6 yg/liter; with 50 percent
survival of the young at 2.1 yg/liter. Sixteen percent reproductive
impairment ocurred at 1.0 yg/liter for 1248 and for 1254 at 0.48 (2
weeks) and 1.0 (3 weeks) yg/liter (Table 8). Almost no reproduction
occurred at 7.5 yg/liter 1248 (Table 9). No reproduction occurred at
3.8 yg/liter 1254 (Table 10) with no adults surviving 3.5 yg/liter
(Table 11). The number of young produced per initial adult and per
surviving adult were determined (Table 12 and 13). This ranged from
0.7 young/initial adult in 7.5 yg/liter 1248 to 75 young/surviving
adult in .45 yg/liter 1254 (Table 14).

-------
28
Table 8. Calculated 2- and 3-week LC50 values, and 50 percent and 16 percent
reproductive impairment! for Daphnia magna subjected to Aroclor 1248
and Aroclor 1254 in continuous-flow conditions.
PCB
2 or 3 week
LC50 (yg/liter)
Reproductive Impairment (ug/liter)
S0%	16%
1240
2.6
(2 weeks)
2.1
1.0
1254
1.8
(2 weeks)
1.1
.48
1254
1.3
(3 weeks)
1.3
1.0
Reproductive impairment is defined as percent decrease from the highest
young produced in either the controls or one of the lower tested toxicant
1pvpT c

-------
29
Table 9. Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 2 weeks' continuous-
flow Exposure to Aroclor 1248.


Initial
Adults Alive at
Total Young


Number
End
of
Test
Produced

Concentration
Test
of
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
Test
wn
Tanks
Animals
1
2
3
1
?.
3
7.5
A
5
0
1
0
0
28
0

B
5
0
0
1
0
0
0

C
5
0
0
0
0
0
0

D
5
0
1
0
0
15
0
2.5
A
5
n
4
2
0
159
12

B
5
4
4
2
224
12
3

C
5
5
5
3
209
0
22

D
5
0
5
5
0
30
28
.86
A
5
5
5
4
150
298
145

B
5
4
5
5
143
86
12

C
5
5
4
5
258
48
64

D
5
5
5
3
57
38
42
.26
A
5
4
3
4
231
118
110

B
5
4
5
5
229
0
97

C
5
5
5
4
279
0
53

D
5
5
5
3
278
214
32
.1
A
5
5
3
3
0
0
38

B
5
4
4
3
57
0
52

C
5
-
5
4

89
120

0
5
4
2
-
193
78

0.0
A
5
4
2
3
61
0
66
Control
B
5
-
3
2

44
16

C
5
4
4
2
93
183
28

0
5
4
2
-
238
57
--

-------
30
Table 10. Survival and reproduction of Oaohnia magna after 2 weeks' continuous-
flow exposure to Aroclor 1254.

Mean

Initial
Adults Alive
Total
Young
Measured

Number
at End
of Test
Produced
Concentration
Test
of
Test
Test
Test
Test
(pq/1)
Tanks
Animals
1
2
1
2
9.0
A
5
0
0
0
0

B
5
0
0
0
0
3.8
A
5
0
0
0
0

B
5
0
0
0
0
1.7
A
5
4
4
0
109

B
5
0
4
0
130
.92
A
5
4
5
49
127

B
5
5
-
93
- - -
.37
A
5
4
4
36
239

B
5
•
4

229
0.0
A
5
4
2
52
122
Control
B
5
-
2

116

-------
31
Table 11. Survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna after 3 weeks' continuous-
flow exposure to Aroclor 1254.
Mean

Initial
Adults Alive
Total
Young
Measured

Number
at End
of Test
Produced
Concentration
Test
of
Test
Test
Test
Test
(iiQ/1)
Tanks
Animals
1
2
1
2
33
A
5
0
0
0
0

B
5
0
0
0
0

C
5
0
0
0
0

0
5
0
0
0
0
9.0
A
5
0
0
0
0

B
5
0
0
0
0

C
5
0
0
0
0

D
5
0
0
0
0
3.5
A
5
0
0
0
0

B
5
0
0
0
0

C
5
0
0
0
0

D
5
0
0
0
0
1.2
A
5
4
4
254
152

B
5
3
4
215
155

C
5
4
3
452
105

D
5
2
4
131
118
.45
A
5
3
5
311
351

B
5
0
5
172
372

C
5
3
5
328
159

D
5
•»
3
— — —
123
0.0
A
5
4
5
172
246
Control
B
5
2
4
102
309

C
5
5
4
136
189

D
•1
'

...


-------
Table 12. Summary of Survival and Reproduction of Daphnia magna After 2 weeks' Continuous-Flow Exposure
to Aroclor 1248.
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Total Number
of Adults
Alive at End
of Tests
Mean
Percent
Survival
of Adults
Total
Young
Produced
Young
Produced ,
as Percent
of Control
Young
Per
Initial
Adul t
Young
Per
Surviving
Adul t
7.5
60
3
5%
43
2.6%
0.7
14
2.5
60
39
65%
699
43%
12
18
.86
60
55
92%
1441
88%
24
26
.26
60
52
87%
1641
100%
27
31
.1
50
37
74%
627
46%
13
17
0.0
Control
50
30
60%
786
57%
16
26

^ Percent decrease from the highest young produced in
levels.
either the
controls or
one of the lower
tested
toxicant
CO
ro

-------
Table 13. Summary of Survival and Reproduction of Daphnia magna After 2 weeks' Continuous-Flow Exposure
to Aroclor 1254.

Mean
Measured
Concentration
(yq/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Total Number %
of Adults
A1 ive at End
of Tests
Mean
Percent
Survival
of Adults
Total
Young
Produced
Young
Produced -|
as Percent
of Control
Young
Per
Initial
Adult
Young
Per
Surviving
Adult
9.0
20
0
0%
0
0%
0
0
3.8
20
0
0%
0
0%
0
0
1.7
20
12
60%
239
36%
12
20
.92
15
14
93%
269
53%
18
19
.37
15
12
80%
504
100%
34
42
0.0
Control
15
8
53%
290
58%
19
36
^ Percent decrease from the highest young produced in either the controls or one of the lower tested toxicant
levels.
U
U

-------
Table 14. Summary of Survival and Reproduction of Daphnia magna After 3 weeks 1 Continuous-Flow Exposure
to Aroclor 1254.
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(yq/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Total Number
of Adults
Alive at End
of Tests
Mean
Percent
Survival
of Adul ts
Total
Young
Produced
Young
Produced -j
as Percent
of Control
Young
Per
Initial
Adult
Young
Per
Surviving
Adult
33
40
0
0%
0
0%
0
0
9.0
40
0
0%
0
0%
0
0
3.5
40
0
0%
0
0%
0
0
1.2
40
23
70%
1583
76%
39
56
.45
35
24
69%
1816
100%
52
76
0.0
Control
30
24
80%
1154
74%
38
48

^ Percent decrease from the highest young produced in either the controls or one of the lower tested toxicant
levels.
U>

-------
35
Fathead Minnow
Calculated 96-hour LC50 values were 7.7 yg/1 for newly hatched
young in 1254 and 15 yg/1 for newly hatched young in 1242. The 96-
hour LC50 for 2 month-old fatheads was greater than 234 yg/1 1242
(ca. 300 yg/1) and greater than 33 pg/1 1254.
Using the calculated 96-hour LC50 values for young fish and the
safe levels determined from the long-term tests application factors of
0.2 for 1254 and 0.16 for 1242 were calculated. If LC50 values for
juvenile fish were used the application factors would be much more
restricti ve.
Reproduction occurred at and below 1.8 yg/1 Aroclor 1254 and at
and below 5.4 yg/1 Aroclor 1242. No survival or reproduction occurred
at 4.6 yg/1 1254 or at 15 yg/1 1242, indicating that 1254 is the more
toxic of the two PCB's. This is also shown by the lower 96-hour LC50
value for 1254.
Aroclor 1242 -- All fish were dead after 96 hours in 51 yg/1
1242; in the duplicate 85 percent were dead. Ninety-five percent in
one duplicate were dead after eight days at 15 yg/1. Only 5 percent
were dead after 60 days at 5.4 yg/1 (Table 15). There was no significant
difference in the final weights or total lengths of the fish (Tables 16
and 17} at the end of the test. Spawning results and egg production
were highly variable (Table 18), even between duplicate tanks. Good
spawning occurred in 5.4 yg/1 in Tank A but no spawning occurred at
all in 5.4 B, even though there were the same numbers of males and

-------
36
females. A slightly higher rate of flow into tank B could account
for the lack of spawning in Tank B because the cumulative nature of
PCB's would cause an increase in tissue level of PCB's.
Egg hatchability and fry survival were also quite variable,
although not so much between duplicates (Table 19). Good hatching
occurred in 5.4 vig/1 • Eggs produced by the controls but maintained
at the higher concentrations of 15 and 51 yg/1 hatched with good
success but none of the fry survived at the high concentrations (Table
20), indicating that the egg stage is not affected by PCB concentrations
which are rapidly lethal to newly hatched fry.
The percent survival of fry produced and reared at the same
concentrations was excellent (Table 21) indicating that the long-term
accumulation of PCB's is the biggest problem, at least at low levels
that are not rapidly lethal.
Aroclor 1254 -- All fish were dead after 96 hours in 15 yg/1 1254
in both duplicate tanks. Twenty-five percent were dead after 17 days
at 4.6 yg/1, and at 60 days fifty percent were dead at 4.6 yg/1. Survival
at lower concentrations was not significantly different from the controls
(Table 22). There was no significant difference in the mean terminal
weights of the experimental fish (Table 23), however, there v/as a delay
in growth (length) at 4.6 yg/1 (Table 24). Spawning occurred at 1.8 yg/1
but was significantly less than that in lower concentrations. Spawning
was highly variable during the test, even between duplicate tanks (Table 25).
Egg hatchability and fry survival were good at and below 1.8 yg/1,
with similar results in all tanks (Table 26). Eggs produced by the controls
and maintained in higher. PCB concentrations (15 yg/1) hatched readily

-------
but all young were dead within 96 hours (Table 27). Young held for
30 days in separate tanks at the same PCB concentrations they were
spawned at all survived and grew well (Table 28).
Aroclor 1248 -- The fathead minnows died rapidly at 18 ng/1
and none were alive at the end of 30 days. Seventy-five percent were
alive at 5.1 ug/1 but their weight was only one-third that of the
controls; though the final lengths were not significantly different
(Table 29).
The final weight of the fish in 2.2yg/l was only half that
of the controls; final lengths were the same. The results in the
lowest 2 concentrations were not significantly different from the
controls.

-------
Table 15. Survival of Fathead Minnows at Various Time Intervals (Aroclor 1242).
Mean

Initial

Survival
at Various Time Intervals


Measured
Concentration
Test
Number
of
Jan.
4 Days
16—96 hrs.
8 Days
Jan. 20
23 Days
Feb. 4
60 Days
March 12
(uq/1)
Tanks
Animals
No.
c>
fa
No.
%
NO.
0/
h
No.
%
51
A
20
3
15%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%

B
20
0
03!
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
15
A
20
20
100%
1
5%
0
0%
0
0%

B
20
20
1005!
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5.4
A
20
20
1003!
20
100%
19
95%
19
95%

B
20
20
1002!
20
100%
19
95%
19
95%
2.9
A
20
20
100%
20
100%
18
90%
15
75%

B
20
20
100%
20
100%
18
90%
18
90%
.86
A
20
20
100%
20
100%
17
85%
17
85%

B
20
20
100%
20
100%
19
95%
19
95%
0.0
A
20
20
100%
20
100%
19
95%
16
80%
Control
B
20
20
100%
20
100%
16
80%
15
75%
CO
CO

-------
39
Table 16. Mean Terminal Weight of Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1242).
Mean
Measured	Number Mean	Number	Mean	Mean wt.
Concentration	of	Weight	of	Weiqht	Males and
(ijg/1)	Males (g)	Females	(g)	Females
51
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
O
0
0
5.4
8
2.40
11
1.05
1.54
2.9
9
2.17
9
.97
1.56
.86
6
2.30
4
.82
1.71
0.0	4	1.70	14	1.10	1.31
Control

-------
Table 17. Growth (Length) of Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1242).
40
Mean
Measured		Mean Length of Fish (mm)	
Concentration	After After After 8 Months (End of Test"]"
(yg/1)	2 Months 3 Months Males Females Both
51
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
5.4
19.1
28.1
61.7
49.4
54.5
2.9
21.4
28.9
58.3
46.3
52.3
.86
21.1
28.5
58.5
45.5
53.3
0.0	20.6	28.4 57.9	47.9	50.1

-------
Table 18. Spawning Results and Egg Production of the Fathead Minnow (Aroclor 1242).
Mean








Measured

Number
Number
Number
Number of
Total
No. of
No. of
Concentration
Test
of
of
of
Spawnings
Eggs
Eggs Per
Eggs Per
(yq/1)
Tanks
Males
Females
Spawninas
Per Female
Produced
Soawninq
Female
51
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.4
A
4
5
25
5.0
1514
61
303

B
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
2.9
A
5
4
24
6.0
1923
80
481

B
4
5
9
1.8
424
47
85
.85
A
6
4
5
1.3
138
28
35

B*
—
—
—
—
—
—
	*
0.0
A
1
8
42
5.2
5350
127
669
Control









B
3
6
24
4.0
1288
54
215

* Accidentally killed

-------
42
Table 19. Egg Hatchability and Fry Survival of the Fathead Minnow (Aroclor 1242).
Mean




Measured

Number
Number of
Egg
Concentration
Test
of Eggs
Live Fry
Hatchabi1i ty
(ng/i)
Tanks
Used
Obtained
Percent
51
A
0
0
0%

B
0
0
0%
15
A
0
0
0%

B
0
0
0%
5.4
A
150
121
81%

B
0
--
--
2.9
A
125
37
30%

B
160
76
m
.86
A
108
91
842

B*
__
--
—
0.0
A
350
216
62%
Control



44%
B
75
33
* Accidentally killed

-------
Table 20. Egg Hatchability and Fry Survival of Eggs Produced by Control Fathead Minnows but Maintained in
Higher PCB Concentrations (Aroclor 1242).


Mean Measured
Concentration (u
q/D
Number
Egg
Number of
Fry
Survival
Source
Of Eqqs
Test
Tanks
Eggs
Exposed to
of Eggs
Used
Hatchabi1i ty
Percent
Live Fry
Obtained
After 30 Days
Percent
Control
A
15 ug/1
25
60%
15
0%
Control
A
51 ug/1
50
82%
41
0%
Control
B
51 ug/1
35
91%
32
0%

-------
Table 21. Results of 30-day Growth and Survival Study of Voung Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1242).

Mean




Mean

Measured

Number
Number

Dry
Mean
Concentration
Test
of Fry
of Fry
Percent
Weight
Length
(uq/1)
Tanks
Used
Survivi nq
Survival
(mq)
(mm)
51
A*
0
0
0%
0
0

B*
0
0
0%
0
0
15
A*
0
0
0%
0
0

B*
0
0
0%
0
0
5.4
A
110
93
84%
12.8
19.2

B*
0
—
—
—
—
2.9
A
15
14
93%
25.3
21.2

B
46
42
91%
16.3
21.4
0.0
A
30
23
77%
8.0
17.2
Control







B
16
15
94%
46.9
27.7
* No fry produced at these concentrations

-------
Table 22. Survival of Fathead Minnows at Various Time Intervals (Aroclor 1254).
Mean

Initial

Survival
at Various Time Intervals


Measured
Concentration
Test
Number
of
Jan.
4 Days
29 — 96 hrs.
17 Days
Feb. 11
60 Days
March 26
(yq/1)
Tanks
Animals
No.
1
No.
0/
to
No.
a
h
15
A
20
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%

B
20
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
4.6
A
20
20
100%
16
80%
10
50%

B
20
20
100%
14
70%
11
55%
1.3
A
20
20
100%
18
90%
17
85%

B
20
20
100%
18
90%
16
80%
.52
A
20
20
100%
17
85%
18
90%

B
20
20
100%
13
65%
13
65%
.23
A
20
20
100%
18
90%
17
85%

B
20
20
100%
19
95%
16
80%
0.0
A
20
20
100%
18
90%
19
95%
Control
B
20
20
100%
16
80%
16
80%

-------
46
Table 23. Mean Terminal Weight of Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1254).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(ug/l)
Number
of
Males
Mean
Weight
(g)
Number
of
Females
Mean
Weight
(g)
Mean v/t.
Males and
Females
15
0
0
0
0
0
4.6
5
2.42
10
1.35
1.7
1 .8
7
2.09
14
1.28
1.55
.52
8
2.67
12
1.25
1.82
.23
6
2.66
13
1.38
1.65
0.0
Control
7
2.8
12
1.51
1.93

-------
47
Table 24. Growth (Length) of Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1254).
Mean
Measured

Mean Length of Fish (mm)
Concentration
(vig/l)
After
2 Months
After
3 Months'
After 8 Months (End of Test)
Males Females Both
15
0
0
0
0 0
4.6
16.4
30.2
60.0
50.6 53.7
1.8
23.5
32.9
59.4
50.9 53.8
.52
27.2
35.5
63.8
51.8 56.6
.23	26.4	35.1 61.2	51.2	54.4
0.0
24.9
33.6 62.8
55.9

-------
Table 25. Spawning Results and Egg Production of the Fathead Minnow (Aroclor 1254).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Test
Tanks
Number
of
Males
Number
of
Females
Number
of
Spawninqs
Number of
Spawnings
Per Female
Total
Eggs
Produced
No. of
Eggs Per
Soawninq
No. of
Eggs Per
Female
15
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.6
A
4
5
0
0
0
0
0

B
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
A
3
7
14
2.0
1473
105
210

B
4
7
1
0.14
22
22
3
.52
A
4
6
30
5.0
4142
138
690

B
4
6
33
5.5
2538
77
423
.23
A
1
8
35
4.4
2993
86
374

B
5
5
8
1.6
346
43
69
0.0
Control
A
B
3
4
6
6
27
2
4.5
0.3
2838
206
105
103
473
34

-------
49
Table 26. Egg Hatchability and Fry Survival of the Fathead Minnow (Aroclor 1254).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(ug/l)
Test
Tanks
Number
of Eggs
Used
Number of
Live Fry
Obtained
Egg
Hatchability
Percent
15
A
0
0
0%

B
0
0
0%
4.6
A
0
0
0%

B
0
0
0%
1.8
A
300
186
62%

B
50
48
96%
.52
A
375
251
67%

B
345
205
59%
.23
A
272
150
55%

B
0
0
0%
0.0
Control
A
B
250
150
191
107
76%
71%

-------
Table 27. Egg Hatchability and Fry Survival of Eggs Produced by Control Fathead Minnows but Maintained in
Higher PCB Concentrations (Aroclor 1254).

Mean Measured
Concentration (uq/1)
Number
Egg
Number of
Fry
Survival
Source
of Eqqs
Test
Tanks
Eggs
Exposed to
of Eggs
Used
Hatchability
Percent
Live Fry
Obtained
After 95 Hrs.
Percent
Control
A
15 ug/1
25
84%
21
0%
Control
B
15 yg/1
25
88%
22
0%
Control
B
15 ug/i
50
94%
47
0%
Control
A
15 yg/1
50
100%
50
0%

cn
O

-------
Table 28. Results of 30-day Growth and Survival Study of Young Fathead Minnows (Aroclor 1254).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Test
Tanks
Number
of Fry
Used
Number
of Fry
Survivinq
Percent
Survival
Mean
Dry
Weight
(mq)
Mean
Length
(mm)
15
A
0
0
0%
0
0

B
0
0
0%
0
0
4.6
A
0
0
0%
0
0

B
0
0
0%
0
0
1.8
A
B
60
0
55
92%
18.05
19.85
.52
A
30
21
70%
16.1
19.9

B
10
10
100%
30.8
24.2
.23
A
B
74
0
54
73%
18.0
19.15
0.0
A
56
55
98%
21.3
19.8
Control
B
24
24
100%
16.3
20.9

-------
52
Table 29. Results of 30-day Survival and Growth Study of Newly Hatched Fathead
Minnows (Aroclor 1248).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(pg/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Mean
Percent
Survival
Final
Mean
Weiqht
(g)
Final
Mean
Length
(rrni)
18
20
0%
-
-
5.1
20
75%
,36
17.9
2.2
20
85%
.49
19.1
.54
20
80%
.92
20.8
.18
20
100%
1.47
20.3
0
20
85%	1.11	18.4

-------
53
Jordanella
Aroclor 1248 -- The fish held in 18 pg/1 lived for about two weeks
before they started to die. One died every 2-3 days until the test was
terminated (40 days); at which time all were dead. Thirty-five percent
were alive at 5.1 yg/1 at the end of the test, with mean weight only
15 percent that of the controls (Table 30). The mean length was 21.8 mm,
compared to 24.6 for the controls.
The fish in 18 and 5.1 pg/1 exhibited almost total loss of fins
and tail, as though they had been eroded away. The one remaining fish
at 18 pg/1 and 3 fish in 5.1 pg/1 died due to a temperature shock when
the temperature dropped from 25° C to 21° C, indicating the precarious
position they were in even though they were still alive.

-------
54
Table 30. Results of AO-day Survival arid Growth Study of Newly Hatched
Oordanclla floridae (Aroclor 1248).
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(pg/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Mean
Percent
Survival
Final
Mean
Weight
(g)
Final
Mean
Length
(mm)
18
20
0%
-
-
5.1
20
35%
.60
21.8
2.2
20
85%
3.02
24.1
.54
20
1002
4.47
26.3
.18
20
90%
3.90
25.5
0	20	100%	4.33	24.6

-------
55
Gammarus
Ninety-six hour LC50 values were calculated for Aroclor 1242
and 1248. Aroclor 1248 was twice as toxic as 1242 with an LC50 of
29 pg/1 f°r 1248 and 73 pg/1iter for 1242 (Table 31).
Survival of the initial test animals after 30 days was significantly
less than survival after 96 hours (Tables 32 and 33). No live animals
remained at 25 pg/1 1242 or 18 pg/1 1248. Fifty-three percent were
alive at 8.7 pg/1 1242 (Table 34) and 52 percent were alive at 5.1
pg/1 1248 (Table 35).
Good reproduction occurred at 2.8 pg/1 1242 and 2.2 yg/1 1248.
Some reproduction occurred at 5.1 pg/1 1248 but it was only half that
of the control and only one-fourth that of 2.2 pg/1.
Application factors (Mount and Stephan, 1967) of 0.1 for 1242 and
0.15 for 1248 were calculated for the PCB's and Gammarus.

-------
56
Table 31. Calculated 96-hour LC50 Values for Gammarus pseudolimnaeus
Subjected to Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 12481


Individual Test
Mean
Aroclor

LC50 Values
LC50
(PCB)
Test
(ijg/1 iter)
(jjg/l i ter)
1242
1
72
73

2
74

1248
1
26


2
28
29

3
30


4
32

1 Calculated according to Standard Methods, 1971 (APHA).

-------
57
Table 32. Survival and Reproduction of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus After
2 Months' Exposure to Aroclor 1242.
Mean

Initial
Adults

Measured

Number
A1 ive
Total
Concentration
Test
of
at End
Young
(vig/i)
Tanks
Animals
of Test
Produced
234
A
20
0
0

B
20
0
0
81
A
20
0
0

B
20
0
0
26
A
20
0
0

B
20
0
0
8.7
A
20
11
0

B
20
10
0
2.8
A
20
14
36

B
20
17
95
0.0
A
20
7
53
Control
B
20
12
77

-------
58
Table 33. Survival and Reproduction of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus After
2 Months' Exposure to Aroclor 1248.
Mean

Initial
Adults

Total
Measured

Number
Alive
Total
Weight
Concentration
Test
of
at End
Young
of Young
(yg/1)
Tanks
Animals
of Test
Produced
(mg)
18
A
15
0
0
0

B
15
0
0
0

C
15
0
0
0
5.1
A
15
10
24
16

B
15
10
94
28

C
15
4
51
46
2.2
A
15
12
85
46

B
15
10
284
140

C
15
11
260
101
.54
A
15
6
130
103

B
15
13
211
132

C
15
13
286
101
.18
A
15
7
83
39

B
15
12
230
105

C
15
14
44
10
0.0
A
15
10
169
91
Control
B
15
10
42
15

C
15
9
119
94

-------
Table 34. Summary of Survival and Reproduction of Gammarus pseudolinnaeus After 2 Months' Exposure
to Aroclor 1242.
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Initi al
Number
of
Animals
Total Number
of Adults
Al ive at
End of Test
Mean
Percent
Survival
of Adults
Total
Young
Produced
Young
Per
Surviving
Adult
234
40
0
0
0
0
81
40
0
0
0
0
26
40
0
0
0
0
8.7
40
21
52%
0
0
2.8
40
31
77%
131
4.2
0.0
Control
40
19
48%
130
6.8

-------
Table 35. Summary of Survival and Reproduction of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus After 2 Months' Exposure
to Aroclor 1248.
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Initial
Number
of
Animals
Total Number
of Adults
Alive at
End of Test
Mean
Percent
Survival
of Adults
Total
Young
Produced
Young
Per
Surviving
Adul t
Total
Weight
of Young
(ma)
Mean
Weight of
Each Young
Scud (mg)
18
45
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.1
45
24
53%
169
7.0
90
.53
2.2
45
33
73%
729
22.1
287
.39
.54
45
32
71%
627
19.6
336
.54
.18
45
33
73%
357
10.8
154
.43
0.0
Control
45
29
64%
330
11.4
200
.61

-------
Table 35a. 1248 Gammarus Chronic - Statistical Treatment of Table 35.
Mean
Measured
Concentration
(uq/1)
Mean
%
Survival

Total
Younq
Young/
Adult
Total Wt.
Younq
13
0

0
0
0
5.1
53.6±*
23.1

56±
35
8.2±
5.3
30 ±
15
2.2
73.3±**
6.5

210±*
108
IS.7±*
n.2
96±
47
.54
71.3±**
27.1

209+*
78
20.0±*
3.3
112±*
17
.15
73.3±**
23.7

119±
98
11.4±
3.1
51 ±
49
0.0
Control
64.7±**
4.0

no±
64
11.4±
6.5
67±
45
Tukey's .05
49.4

206
18.7
95.9
.01
64.0

267
24.2
124
* Significantly different from 16 yg/1
conc. at
the 0.05 level


** Significantly different from 18 yg/1
conc. at
the 0.01 level.


Note: In only one case (mean
% survival) was the 18
ug/1 treatment significantly different
from the

-------
62
Midges
Adults emerged at concentrations up to 9 yg/liter 1248. Larvae
were present at 18 pg/1 but adult emergence did not occur. Abundant
emergence did not occur above 5.1 ug/liter. Aroclor 1254 was more toxic
to midges as no emergence occurred above 3.5 yg/1, and abundant
emergence did not occur above 3 yg/liter, even though larvae were
present (Table 36).
The survival and growth of the midge when tested with Aroclor
1254 was excellent in control chambers but was reduced by 50 percent
at the lowest test concentration of .45 yg/liter (Table 36). At 1.2
pg/liter larval cases were reduced to 35 percent of the control and
pupal cases were reduced to 24 percent of the control . No larval cases
were formed at 33 yg/l and no pupal cases were constructed at 9 iig./l.
The calculated 2-week LC50 for 1254(50 percent reduction based on
control as 100 percent was .65 yg/1 for larvae and .45 vg/1 for pupae,
indicating that a safe level for midge well-being is below 1 yg/liter
of Aroclor 1254.

-------
63
Table 36. Effect of Aroclor 1254 on the Growth and Survival of the
Midge Tanytarsus dissimi1 is.
Mean


No. of




Measured

Mature Larval
Cases
No.
of Pupal Cases
Concentration

Each

% of
Each

% of
. (jiq/1)
Test
Test
Mean
Control
Test
Mean
Control
33
A
0


0



B
0
0
0%
0
0
0%

C
0


0



D
0


0


9.0
A
0


0



B
0
.25
.2%
0
0
0%

C
0


0



D
1


0


3.5
A
3


1

10%

B
7
24
22%
0
3

C
14


5



D
-


-


1.2
A
43


7

24%

B
68
37
35%
5
7

C
4


2



D
35


7


.45
A
70


4



B
25
56
52%
27
16
55%

C
82


16



D
48


16


0.0
A
94


32


Control
B
108
107
100%
33
29
100%

C
119


22



D
-


-



-------
64
DISCUSSION
Analytical Results
The method described here worked very well for monitoring the flowing
system being used. The variability of this method, as indicated by the
variability in analysis of duplicate samples mentioned above, is less
than that of the test organisms. It was reasoned that the variability
of the test organisms or diluter system would be greater than that of
the total analysis so some accuracy was sacrificed in the interest of
time. The fact that our test water (Lake Superior untreated) is relatively
free of organics, in amounts that would interfere with a G. C. analysis,
allowed us to eliminate a cleanup step thereby saving time and reducing
the manipulative error. However, a cleanup step is recommended when
extracting • volumes of water larger than those used here or when using
the more sensitive Electron Capture Detectors.
A residue chemist using this method for anything other than monitoring
a closed system, such as ours, would find that the sacrifices in accuracy
made to reduce the time of analysis could not be tolerated. This method
could not, then, be used in monitoring natural bodies of water or tissue
from affected organisms.

-------
65
Daphnia
Daphnia magna was used as a test organism because its small size,
short life cycle, and sensitivity to chlorinated hydrocarbons makes it
ideally suited to determine the comparative tonicity of related chemicals
such as the Aroclor mixtures. The fact that it 1s a significant
representative of a large group of zooplankton important as fish food
makes the information more useful in establishing cirteria for safe-
guarding aquatic life from PCB's.
Because the continuous-flow tests indicated much lower safe
levels for Daphnia we believe that the static test method should not
be used for establishing water quality criteria for PCB's, even though
it is a useful technique for determining relative toxicity. Continuous-
flow systems should be employed whenever possible.
As can be seen in all of the tables there is a consistent trend
for the mid-concentrations to have better survival and young production
than the lowest test concentrations or the controls. This also has
been observed by Biesinger and Christensen (1972.) with Daphnia and
summarized and discussed by Smyth (1967) with other animals tested
with similar methods.

-------
66
Fish
The results obtained from this study indicate that Polychlorinated
Biphenyls are acutely toxic, but exhibit a much greater chronic toxicity
at very low levels caused by the cumulative nature of the mixtures. The
newly hatched larvae appear to be the most sensitive stage in the life
cycle, at least for short-term exposure. Tissues of the fish used during
this study are being analyzed by Dr. D. Stalling, Columbia, Mo., and
should shed additional light on the relationship between toxicity of
water concentrations and tissue levels. Because only the least sensitive
of the fish tested survived to reproduce 1t appears that the newly hatched
larvae are most sensitive to PCB's. Further generation studies with the
resistant offspring might well produce young surviving higher concentrations
than their parents were capable of spawning in. The eggs were apparently
quite resistant or impermeable to the PCB mixtures. The PCB mixtures
appeared to inhibit fungus growths on the Incubating eggs, giving much
better egg hatch at higher PCB levels. Juvenile fish, when tested for
up to 30 days were also much less susceptible than very young fish.

-------
67
Gammarus
The 96-hour LC50 values with Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Indicate that
PCB's are toxic after short periods of time, but the cumulative nature
of these chlorinated hydrocarbon chemicals makes it more difficult to
predict their toxicity from these short tests. The application factors
of 0.16 and 0.20 may possibly be used to estimate long term safe levels
from short tes.ts with the other PCB's not tested with Gammarus.
Results from this study are in general agreement with the few
studies that have been conducted v/ith aquatic Crustacea. Saunders
(in press) found that 1242 killed G. fasciatus at 42 wg/1 in 4- to
7-day tests, essentially the same as the value of 29 pg/liter determined
during this study. However, Saunders obtained a 96-hour LC50 for 1254
of 2,400 pg/1 which is clearly different than the 73 yg/1 LC50 obtained
during this study. Static tests conducted by Wildish (1970) with the
scud Gammarus oceanicus and Aroclor 1254 indicated a range in toxicity
from 100 to 1.0 yg/liter, similar to the values in this study with jG.
pseudolimnaeus.
The glass shrimp Palaemonetes kadiakensis was sensitive to 1254
under continuous-flow conditions with a 7-day LC50 of 3 ug/1 (Saunders,
in press). The crayfish Orconectes nais was more tolerant (Saunders,
in press), with a 7-day LC50 of 100 pg/1 1254 1n static tests and 80
ug/1 1254 under continuous-flow conditions. It had a 7-day LC50 of
30 yg/1 when tested with 1254.

-------
The pink shrimp tested by Duke (personal communication) showed
the same delayed mortality as the Gammarus in the present study. The
toxicity of Aroclor 1254 ranged from .94 yg/1 for juveniles (51 percent
after 15 days) to 3.5 pg/1 after 35 days with adults. Regardless of
the Aroclor concentration in the water, shrimp showed delayed mortality
and died at a rate of one to two per day with no apparent symptoms of
poisoning, just as Gammarus responded in the present study.

-------
69
Midges
No reproductive data with insects is available to compare with
the midge data in this study. However, Schoettger (personal communication)
reports some acute data for other aquatic insects. Dragonfly and damsel fly
nymphs, Macromia sp. and Ischnura vertical is, were comparatively tolerant
to 1242 and 1254. The dragonfly had a 7-day TL50 (static test) of 800
pg/1 for 1242 and 1,000 pg/1 for 1254. The damsel fly, tested under
continuous-flow conditions had a 4-day TL50 of 400 pg/1 for 1242 and 200
pg/1 for 1254.

-------
70
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Arlene Shelhon and Marjorie Starr for aid in
conducting the static bioassays, Dr. Ksnneth Biesinger for helpful
suggestions concerning Daphnia rearing and testing, and Kenneth Campbell
for assistance with chemical analyses and preliminary testing. We
thank Henry Bell, Wesley Smith, and Allen Batterman for aid during
testing, Robert Andrew for helpful suggestions and statistical
assistance, and John Teasley for aid in obtaining chemicals for testing
and assisting with initial phases of the study.
We also wish to thank Monsanto Chemical Company for their cooperation
and for making Aroclor samples available for testing.

-------
71
LITERATURE CITED
American Public Health Association. 1965, Standard Methods for the
examination of Water and Wastewater. 12th ed. 769 pp.
Armour, J. A., and 0. A. Burke. 1969. Polychlorinated Biphenyls as
Potential Interference in Pesticide Residue Analysis. F. D. A.
Laboratory Information Bull. No. 918, 11 p.
Armour, J. A., and J. A. Burke. 1970. Method for Separating Poly-
chlorinated Biphenyls from DDT and its Analogs. JAOAC 53, 761.
Biesinger, K. E., and G. M. Christensen. 1972. Toxicity of Heavy
Metals to Daphnia magna (in press).
Brungs, W. A. 1969. Chronic Toxicity of Zinc to the Fathead Minnow
Pimephales promalas Rafinesque. Trans. Amer. Fish, Soc. 98(2):
272-279.
Cutkomp, L. K., and R. B. Koch. 1971. The Sensitivity of Fish ATPases
to Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Nature (in press). (Dept. of
Entomology, University of Minnesota 55101).
Duke, T. W. (personal communication). Gulf Breeze Lab., EPA, Gulf
Breeze, Florida.
Duke, T. W., J. I. Lowe, and A. J. Wilson, Jr., 1970. A Polychlorinated
Biphenyl (Aroclor 1254 ) in the Water, Sediment, and Biota of
Escambia Bay, Florida. Bull. Env. Cont. and Tox. 5(2,) :171-180.
Jensen, S. 1966. Report of 2 New Chemical Hazard. New Sci. 32, 612.
Jensen, S., R. G. Johnels, S. Olsson, and G. Otterlind. 1969. DDT
and PCB in Marine Animals from Swedish Waters. Nature 224, 247.
Koeman, J. H., M. C. Ten Noever de Brauw, and R. H. de Vos. 1969.
Chlorinated Biphenyl in Fish, Mussels, and Birds from the River
Rhine and the Netherlands Coastal Area. Nature, 221:1126-1128.
Litchfield, J. T., and F. Wilcoxon. 1949. A simplified Method of
Evaluating Dose-effect Experiments. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
96(2):99-113.
McKim, J. M., and D. A. Benoit. 1971. Effects of Long-Term Exposures
to Copper on Survival, Growth, and Reproduction of Brook Trout
(Salve! inus fontinalis). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 28(5):655-662-

-------
72
Mount, D. I., and W. A. Brungs. "1967. A Simplified Dosing Apparatus
for Fish Toxicology Studies. Wat. Res. 1:21-29.
Mount, [). I., and C. E. Stephan. 1967. A Method for Establishing
acceptable toxicant limits for Fish-Maiathion and the Butoxy-
o tha no 1 Ester of 2,4-D. Trans. Amor. Pish. Soc. 96(2):185-193.
Pea kail, D. B., and J. L. Lincer. 1970. Polychlorinated Biphenyls.
Another Long-Life Widespread Chemical in the Environment. Bio-
science 20(17) :9!)8-9G4.
Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. I, 1963. Food and Drug Administration,
Washington, D.C.
Reynolds, L. M. 1969. Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB's) and Their Interference
with Pesticide Residue Analysis. Bull. Environ. Contain, and Toxicol.
4, 120.
Risebrough, R., and V. Brodine. 1970. More Letters in the Wind.
Environment 12(1): 16-27.
Risebrough, R. W., P. Reiche, D. B. Peakall , S. G. Herman, and M. N.
Kirven. 1968. Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Global Ecosystem.
Nature 220, 1098.
Risebrough, R. W., P. Reiche, and H. S. Olcott. 1969. Current Progress
in the Determination of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Bull. Env.
Cont. Tox. 192.
Saunders, H. 0. (in press). Special Report on PCB's, In: Progress
in Sport Fishery Research, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife,
Resource Publication USGPO.
Schoettger, R. A. (personal communication). Fish-Pesticide Lab.,
Columbia, MO.
Smyth, II. F., Jr. 1967. Sufficient Challenge. Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol.
5:51-58.
Sprague, J. B. 1969. Measurement of Pollutant Toxicity to Fish. I.
Bioassay Methods for Acute Toxicty. Wat. Res. 3:793-821.
Stalling, D. L. 1970. Summary of PCB Research at the Fish-Pesticide
Research Laboratory. Report of the Annual Meeting of the Great
Lakes Fishery Comm., June 16-18.

-------
73
Stalling, D. L. (in press). Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's) in
Freshwater Ecosystems. Fish Pesticide Lab. Columbia, MO.
Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torric. I960. Principles and Procedures of
Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 401 p.
Veith, G. D., and G. F. Lee. 1970. A Review of Chlorinated Biphenyl
Contamination in Natural Waters. Wat. Res. 4:265-269.
Wildish, D. J. 1970. The Toxicity of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)
in Sea Water to Gammarus oceanicus. Bull. Env. Contain, and
Toxicology, 5(3):202-204.
Zitco, V. 1970. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Solubilized in Water
by Nonionic Surfactants for Studies of Toxicity to Aquatic Animals.
Bull. Env. Cont. Tox. 5(3):279-285.

-------