United States Office of Air Quality EPA-450/4-84-014r
Environmental Protection Planning and Standards April 1987
Agency Research Triangle Park NC 27711
C-EPA National Dioxin
Study Tier 4 —
Combustion Sources
Final Test
Report — Site 9
Carbon Regeneration
Furnace CRF — A
—
-------
EPA-450/4-84-014r
NATIONAL DIOXIN STUDY
TIER 4 — COMBUSTION SOURCES
Final Test Report — Site 9
Carbon Regeneration Furnace CRF —A
By
Carol L Jamgochian
Lawrence E. Keller
Winton Kelly
Radian Corporation
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Contract Number: 68-02-3850
Oonald Oberacker. Project Officer
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office Of Air And Radiation
Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
And
Office Of Research And Development
Washington DC 20460
April 1987
-------
This report has been reviewed by the Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication as received from the
contractor. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of the Agency, neither does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
EPA-450/4-84-014r
ii
-------
FOREWORD
This report is the result of a cooperative effort
between the Office of Research and Development's Hazardous
Waste Engineering Research Laboratory (HWERL) and the
Office of Air. Quality Planning and Standard's Monitoring
and Data Analysis Division (MDAD). The overall management
of Tier 4 of the National Dioxin Study was the responsi-
bility of MDAD. In addition, MDAD provided technical
guidance for the source test covered by this report.
HWERL was directly responsible for the management and
technical direction of the source test.
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION . 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY 2-1
2.1 Source Sampling and Analysis Overview 2-1
2.2 Summary of Results 2-4
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
3.1 Host Site Description 3-1
3.2 Carbon Regeneration Furnace 3-1
3.3 Emissions Control System 3-3
4.0 TEST RESULTS 4-1
4.1 Description of Test Periods 4-1
4.2 Process Data 4-1
4.2.1 Carbon Regeneration Furnace Operation ..... 4-3
4.2.2 Afterburner Operation 4-3
4.2.3 Evaporative Cooler - Baghouse Operation .... 4-11
4.3 Flue Gas Parameter Data 4-11
4.4 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data 4-14
4.5 Dioxin/Furan Emissions 4-20
4.5.1 Isomer and Homologue Specific Data at the
Spray Cooler Inlet 4-20
4.5.2 Isomer and Homologue Specific Data at the
ESP Outlet 4-25
4.5.3 Reduction of Dioxin/Furan Concentrations Due
to the Particulate Control Device 4-31
4.6 Spent Carbon Feed Precursor Data 4-31
4.7 HC1 Train Chlorides Emissions Data 4-34
4.8 Dioxin/Furan Results of Baghouse Ash 4-37
4.9 Dioxin/Furan Results and Precursor Results of Ambient
Air Sampling 4-37
4.10 Dioxin/Furan Results of Soil Sampling 4-37
4.11 Dioxin/Furan Results of Reactivated Carbon Sampling. . 4-37
5.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 Test Description 5-1
5.2 Gaseous Sampling 5-1
5.2.1 Gaseous Sampling Location 5-1
5.2.1.1 Baghouse Outlet Exhaust Stack 5-1
5.2.1.2 Spray Cooler Inlet
(Afterburner Outlet) 5-4
5.2.1.3 Multiple Hearth Furnace Outlet
(Afterburner Inlet) 5-7
5.2.1.4 Ambient Air Sampling 5-7
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(cont'd.)
Section Page
5.2. Gaseous Sampling (cont'd.)
5.2.2 Gas Sampling Procedures 5-7
5.2.2.1 Modified Method 5 (MM5) 5-7
5.2.2.2 HC1 Determination 5-12
5.2.2.3 Ambient Air Sampling 5-12
5.2.2.4 Volumetric Gs Flow Rate Determination. 5-14
5.2.2.5 Flue Gas Moisture Determination. . . . 5-14
5.2.2.6 Flue Gas Molecular Weight
Determi nation 5-14
5.2.2.7 Continuous Emissions Monitoring. . . . 5-14
5.3 Solid Sampling 5-15
5.3.1 Feed Sampling 5-15
5.3.2 Reactivated Carbon Product 5-16
5.3.3 Baghouse Dust Sampling 5-16
5.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 6-1
6.1 Dioxins/Furans 6-1
6.2 Dioxin/Furan Precursors 6-2
6.2.1 GC/MS Analyses 6-2
6.2.1.1 Sample Preparation 6-3
6.2.1.2 Analysis 6-5
6.3 TOX Analysis 6-7
6.4 Total Chlorine Analysis 6-10
7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 7-1
7.1 Manual Gas Sampling 7-1
7.1.1 Equipment Calibration and Glassware Preparation 7-1
7.1.2 Procedural QC Activities/Manual Gas Sampling. . 7-3
7.1.3 Sample Custody 7-4
7.2 Continuous Monitoring/Molecular Weight Determination . 7-6
7.3 Laboratory Analysis 7-8
7.3.1 Dioxin/Furan Analyses 7-8
7.3.1.1 Surrogate Recoveries of the Test
Samples 7-8
7.3.1.2 Sample Blanks 7-11
7.3.2 Total Chloride Analysis 7-11
Appendix A Field Sampling Data
A.l Modified Method 5 and EPA Methods 1-4 Results. . . A-l
A.2 Ambient Air Train Results A-15
A.3 CEM Results A-21
A A HC1 Train Results A-27
A.5 Modified Method 5 and EPA Methods 1-4 Sample
Calculation A-39
A.6 EPA Method 3 Data A-45
vi
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(cont'd.)
Section Page
Appendix B Process Monitoring Data B-l
Appendix C Field Data Sheets
C.l MM5-Inlet Runs Sheets C-l
C.2 MM5-Outlet Run Sheets C-13
C.3 Ambient Run Sheets C-25
C.4 HC1 -Outlet Run Sheets C-29
C.5 Sampling Train Recovery Sheets C-35
C.6 Preliminary Traverse Point Location/Traverse and
Nomograph Data Sheets C-65
Appendix D Meter Calibrations D-l
Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Data E-l
Appendix F Project Participants F-l
Appendix G Sample Shipment Letter G-l
Appendix H Run-Specific Dioxin/Furan Emissions Data H-l
Appendix I Error Analysis of Control Device Efficiency Calculations. . 1-1
Appendix J Run-Specific Homologue Distributions J-l
Appendix K Run-Specific Risk Modeling Input Data K-l
vii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2-1 Source Sampling and Analysis Overview for Site CRF-A. . . . 2-3
2-2 Summary of Mean Dioxin and Furan Emissions Data for
Site CRF-A 2-6
4-1 Summary of Test Times for Each Run, Site CRF-A 4-2
4-2 Furnace CRF-A Hearth Temperature History
Deviation From Test Average (%) 4-7
4-3 Summary of Regenerator Furnace Feed Conditions, Site CRF-A. 4-8
4-4 Summary of Afterburner Operating Data 4-9
4-5 Summary of Evaporative Cooler--Baghouse Operating Data. . . 4-12
4-6 Summary of Flue Gas Parameters at Site CRF-A 4-13
4-7 Mean Values and Standard Deviations of Continuously
Monitored Combustion Gases at Outlet Location 4-15
4-8 Overview of Dioxin and Furan Emissions Concentration Data
for Site CRF-A 4-21
4-9 Summary of Dioxin and Furan Mass Flow Rate for Site CRF-A . 4-22
4-10 Summary of Dioxin/Furan Flue Gas Emissions Data at the
Spary Cooler Inlet for Site CRF-A 4-23
4-11 Summary of Dioxin/Furan Emissions Data at the Spray
Cooler Inlet for Site CRF-A (Concentrations corrected
to 3% Oxygen) 4-24
4-12 Dioxin/Furan Emissions Mass Flow at the Spray Cooler Inlet
for Site CRF-A 4-27
4-13 Summary of Dioxin/Furan Emissions Data at the Outlet
Stack for Site CRF-A 4-28
4-14 Summary of Dioxin/Furan Emissions Data at the Outlet
Stack for Site CRF-A (Concentrations corrected
to 3% Oxygen) 4-29
ix
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(cont'd.)
Tab!e Page
4-15 Dioxin/Furan Emission Factors at the Outlet Stack for
Site CRF-A 4-32
4-16 Spray Cooler/Baghouse System Removal Efficiencies at
Site CRF-A 4-33
4-17 Summary of Dioxin Precursor Data for Site CRF-A
Feed Samples 4-35
4-18 Chloride Concentrations at the Outlet Stack for Site CRF-A. 4-36
4-19 Results of Dioxin/Furan Analysis of Baghouse Ash Samples
at Site CRF-A 4-38
4-20 Ambient Dioxin/Furan Concentrations in Vicinity of
Atomizing Air Intake Point to Spray Cooler 4-39
5-1 Source Sampling and Analysis Matrix for Site CRF-A 5-2
5-2 Summary of Gas Sampling Methods Used at Site CRF-A 5-8
6-1 Analytical Conditions for the GC/MS 6-6
6-2 Components of the Calibration Solution 6-8
6-3 Analytical Conditions for TOX Analysis 6-9
7-1 Glassware Precleaning Procedure 7-2
7-2 Summary of Isokinetic Results 7-5
7-3 Summary of Drift Check and Control Standard Results .... 7-7
7-4 Percent Surrogate Recoveries for Site CRF-A Dioxin/Furan
Analyses .....7-9
7-5 Percent Surrogate Recoveries for Site CRF-A Feed Samples. . 7-10
7-6 Analytical Results for Troika Quality Control Samples for
Site CRF-A 7-12
7-7 Proof Blank and Field Blank Dioxin/Furan Data for
Site CRF-A MM5 Samples 7-13
x
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
2-1 Simplified Process Flow Diagram of Carbon
Regeneration Process 2-2
2-2 Data Summary for Site CRF-A 2-5
3-1 Process Flow Diagram of Carbon Regeneration Process 3-2
4-1 Hearth Temperature Variation, Hearths 112, and
Furnace Flue Gas 4-4
4-2 Hearth Temperature Variation, Hearths 3, 4 & 5 4-5
4-3 Hearth Temperature Variation, Hearths 6 & 7 4-6
4-4 Afterburner Temperature vs. Test Time, Site CRF-A 4-10
4-5 Oxygen Concentration History at the Baghouse Outlet 4-16
4-6 Carbon Dioxide Concentration History at the
Baghouse Outlet 4-17
4-7 Carbon Monoxide Concentration History at the
Baghouse Outlet 4-18
4-8 Total Hydrocarbon Concentration History at the
Baghouse Outlet 4-19
4-9 Homologue Distribution at the Spray Cooler Inlet 4-26
4-10 Homologue Distribution at the Baghouse Outlet 4-30
5-1 Sample Point Diagram for Carbon Regeneration Furnace 5-3
5-2 Baghouse Outlet Exhaust Stack Sampling Location 5-5
5-3 Spray Cooler Inlet (Afterburner Outlet) Sampling Location ... 5-6
5-4 Modified Method 5 Train 5-10
5-5 Adsorbent Sampling System 5-11
5-5 Components of Ambient Air Sampling Train 5-13
6-1 Sample Preparation Flow Diagram for CRF-A Precursor
Analyses 6-4
xi
-------
1.0 Introduction
The Environmental Protection Agency is assessing the potential for the
emissions of dioxin/furans3 from combustion sources under Tier 4 of the
National Dioxin Study. If any of the combustion sources are found to emit
dioxins, the secondary purpose of the Tier 4 study is to quantify these
emissions and, if possible, relate the emissions to combustion parameters.
Carbon regeneration furnaces are one of eight source categories that have
been included in the field test program. Carbon regeneration furnaces react-
ivate spent carbon from industrial or municipal water treatment facilities.
The spent carbon may contain adsorbed chlorinated compounds.
This report presents the results of an emission test program conducted by
Radian during May 28-31, 1985 at an industrial carbon regeneration furnace
designated as Site CRF-A. The furnace was selected after an initial informa-
tion screening and a pretest survey visit. This facility is considered-
representative of other carbon regeneration furnaces in the United States.
Furnace CRF-A regenerates spent carbon from more than 20 plants that use
activated carbon for industrial wastewater treatment.
An overview of the test program and the results and conclusions are
presented in Section 2.0. The carbon regeneration furnace and the emission
control system are described in Section 3.0. The process variables recorded
during the tests and the detailed test results are presented in Section 4.0.
Sections 5.0 through 7.0 present the various testing details. These include
descriptions of the sampling locations and procedures (Section 5.0), descrip-
tions of the analytical procedures (Section 6.0), and a summary of the quality
control results (Section 7.0). The appendices contain complete calculations,
field data, and other supporting material generated during the field test and
analytical activities.
aThe term dioxin/furan as used in this report refers to the polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran isomers with four or more chlorine atoms.
1-1
-------
2.0 SUMMARY
2.1 SOURCE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
The host plant (Site CRF-A) is an activated carbon regeneration plant. A
carbon regeneration furnace processing spent activated carbon that may contain
adsorbed chlorinated organic compounds was tested for dioxin/furan emissions.
Emissions in the exhaust gas from the carbon regeneration furnace are
controlled by an afterburner, a sodium carbonate spray cooler and a baghouse.
A process flow diagram of the carbon regeneration furnace and emissions
control system is shown in Figure 2-1.
The gaseous and solid sampling conducted in this test program are
summarized in Table 2-1. Sampling for dioxin/furan emissions was performed at
the spray cooler inlet location and the baghouse outlet exhaust stack. The
dioxin/furan sampling generally followed the October 1984 draft of the
Modified Method 5 (MM5) procedure developed by the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for measuring emissions of chlorinated organic
compounds with minor changes. The two changes in the method are described in
Section 5 of this report. The MM5 sample train components (probe rinses,
filter, sorbent trap, etc.) were analyzed for dioxin/furan by one of the three
EPA laboratories referred to collectively in the National Dioxin Study as
Troika. The analysis quantified the 2378-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin isomer
(2378-TCDD), the tetra- through octa-polychlorinated dioxin homologues (PCDD),
and the tetra- through octa-polychlorinated dibenzo furan homologues (PCDF).
Sampling for HC1 emissions was performed at the baghouse outlet exhaust
stack using an HC1 train, which is a modified version of the Method 5 train.
Ambient air sampling was performed near the atomizing air intake point at the
spray cooler. The ambient air sampling train contained an adsorbent resin to
capture organic compounds. The resin samples were analyzed to determine the
dioxin/furan and dioxin precursor concentrations in the ambient air.
Integrated bag samples were collected at the furnace exhaust using EPA Method
3 for fixed gas (C02, CO, O2, N^) analysis. The samples were analyzed on-site
using gas chromatography with thermal conductivity detection.
2-1
-------
Baghouse Exhaust
Gas to Atmosphere
Furnace Exhaust Gas
Spent Carbon
Air-atomized
Sodium Carbonate Solution
ro
Natural Gas,Air
Baghouse Catch
to Land Disposal
Natural Gas. A^
Spray Cooler
Baghouse
Atterburner
Multiple
Hearth
Furnace
Reactivated Carbon
Figure 2-1. Simplified Process Flow Diagram of Carbon Regeneration Process.
-------
TABLE 2-1. SOURCE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW FOR SITE CRF-A
Item Item Description
1. Number of test runs - Three identical test runs. (Runs 1, 2, 3).
2. Gaseous sampling - MM5 dioxin sampling at the baghouse outlet
exhaust stack and the spray cooler inlet
(afterburner outlet) location (Runs 1, 2,
and 3). Dioxin/furan analysis. '
- MM5 HC1 sampling at the baghouse outlet
exhaust stack (Runs 1, 2, 3). Total chloride
analysis.
- Ambient air sampling near atomizing air
intake point at spray cooler. (Two
identical composites for Runs 1, 2, 3.)
Dioxin/furan and precursor analysis.
- EPA Reference Methods 2 and 4 at baghouse
outlet exhaust stack and spray cooler
inlet (Runs 1, 2, 3). Gas velocity and
moisture.
- Integrated bag sampling (EPA Reference
Method 3) at baghouse outlet exhaust stack,
spray cooler inlet and furnace outlet
(Runs 1, 2, 3). C02, 0«, and N- analysis
for molecular weignt determination.
- Continuous monitoring of CO, CO-, 0?, S0?,
NO , and THC (total hydrocarbons) at
baghouse outlet exhaust stack.
(Runs 1, 2, 3).
4. Solid sampling - Spent carbon feed sampling (Runs 1, 2, 3).
Precursor analysis.
- Baghouse dust sampling (Runs 1, 2, 3).
Dioxin/furan analysis.
2-3
-------
Samples of the spent carbon feed to the regeneration furnace were
collected and analyzed for.dioxin precursors. Samples of the regenerated
carbon product and the baghouse dust were collected and analyzed for
dioxin/furan. The dioxin/furan analyses were performed by EMSL-RTP and
ECL-Bay St. Louis, two of the three labs known as Troika, and the dioxin
precursor analyses were performed by Radian. Specific dioxin precursors
analyzed for were chlorophenols, chlorobenzenes, polychlarinated biphenyls and
total chlorides.
Continuous emissions monitors (CEM) were operated during the test periods
to measure COg, Og, CO, and total hydrocarbon (THC) concentrations in the
exhaust gas from the baghouse. The continuous monitoring data were used in
conjunction with the process data to document the stability of combustion
conditions during the test.
2.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The data obtainedat Site CRF-A during the Tier 4 test is summarized in
Figure 2-2. Detectable quantities of all targeted dioxin and furan species
except 2378 TCDD and 2378 TCDF were found in the stack gas at the baghouse
outlet exhaust stack. The mean dioxin and furan emissions data is summarized
in Table 2-2. Average as-measured stack gas concnetrations of the total PCOD
and total PCDF at the baghouse outlet were 1.4 ng/dscm and 1.3 ng/dscm,
respectively. The hourly emission rates were 32 ug/hr for total PCDD and 29
ug/hr for total PCDF. Hexa, hepta- and octa- CDD were the most prevalent of
the tetra- through octa-chlorinated dioxin homologues, while the furans were
dominated by tetra-CDF.
At the spray cooler inlet, all targeted dioxin and furan species were
detected. Average as-measured stack gas concentrations were 0.06 ng/dscm for
2378 TCDD, 21 ng/dscm for total PCDD and 50 ng/dscm for total PCDF. The
hourly emissions rates were 0.96 ug/hr for 2378 TCDD, 310 ug/hr for total
PCDD, and 750 ug/hr for total PCDF. For the dioxin homologues, hepta- and
octa- TCDD were the most prevalent and for the furan homlogues tetra-CDD's
other than 2378 TCDD were most prevalent. The spray cooler/baghouse emission
control system positively controlled dioxin/furan emissions.
2-4
-------
ro
i
cn
©©
ND - not detected.
Spent Carbon Slurry Precursor Data
Chlorobenzenes
2.85 ug/g
(ppo)
PCBs
ND
Chlorophenols
ND
Total chlorides
6400 ug/g
(ppm)
SpenlCwtoon
NtiuAlOts. Air
NO - not detected
Flue Gas Parameter Data@©
Chloride Emissions Data
Emission
Emission
Species
Concentration
Rate
Factor
(ng/dscn 9 3X 0^)
(ug/hr)
(ng/kg)
INLET:
2378 TCDD
0.09
0.96
0.89
Total PCDO
28.8
310
300
Total PCDF
S0.1
754
700
OUTLET:
2378 TCDD
ND
ND
HO
Total PCD0
3.69
31.6
31.3
Total PCDF
3.32
28.8
27.3
©
Baghou* Ejiheusl
Cm io Aimotphar*
Fum«c«Eit)MitOti
®
yutiipto
Hm/Ui
Fum*c«
©
¥
©
BighouM
AM ¦ HOfUlU
Naiutal Qu. Ah Sodtum C*feon«t» Solution
.©
AMCthriUdCMbon
Spray Cooler
Inlet:
Flowrate
250 dscmn
Temperature
854 C
Moisture
27 volX
Baghouse Outlet:
Flowrate
380 dscmn
Temperature
170 C
Moisture
36 volX
.©
Ambient Air
©
Production Rate of
Regenerated Carbon:
Feed characteristics:
Total volatlles
Mo Isture
Organic*
Afterburner temperature:
1080 kg/hr
49.9% w/h
36.5* w/w
13.4% w/w „
1750 F (950 I
'C)
Specles
Concentration
(ng/dsca)
2378 ICD0 ND (0.01)
Total PCDO 0.02
Total PCDF 0.04
ND - not detected
Continuous Monitoring Data
©
Train Concentration
Component (mg/dscm 9 3X O^)
Emission
Rate
(kg/hr)
Emission Factor
(ag/kg, reactivated
carbon produced)
Front half 1.73
0.023
21
Back half 1.69
0.019
18
Train total 3.44
0.042
39
13.9 Xvol, dry
13.2 Xvol 8 3% 0,
dry
2, dry
THC 3.0 ppmv 9 3X 0^, wet
2 "J ' " "2
CO B8.S ppov 9 3X O.
Spray Cooler Operating Data
©
Inlet temperature
Outlet temperature
Water flowrate
1700°F (927°C)
400 F (204 C)
24 gpm (90 Ipm)
BaohouM Ctlch
lo Land OltpOMl
Baahouse Operating Data
©
Inlet Temperature:
400°F (204°C)
Gas flowrate:
380
dscmo
P
5.6
in M?0
Baghouse Ash ©
Concentration
Species (ppb)
Total PCOD
Total PCDF
1.1
0.5
Figure 2-2.
Data summary for Site CRF-A.
-------
TABLE 2-2. SUMMARY OF MEAN DIOXIN AND FURAN
EMISSIONS DATA FOR SITE CRF-A
Parameter 2378 TCDD Total PCDD Total PCDF
INLET:
Emissions Concentration
(ng/dscm)
As-measured
Corrected to 3% O2
Emissions Rate (ug/hr)
OUTLET:
Emissions Concentration
(ng/dscm)
As-measured ND 1.4 1.3
Corrected to 3% O2 ND 2.7 3.3
Emissions Rate (ug/hr) ND 32 29
0.06 21 50
0.09 29 70
0.96 310 750
-------
Dioxin and furan homlogues were detected at low concentration in the
baghouse ash. All tfle dioxin homologues but 2378 TCDD were detected and the
tetra- and penta- and octa- chlorinated.furan homlogues were detected. The
total average concentration were 1.1 ppb for TCDD and 0.5 ppb for TCDF. The
baghouse treated an average of 380 dscmm of flue gas at a temperature of 204°C
(400°F). The average pressure drop across the baghouse was 5.6 in ^0.
The ambient air in the general vicinity of the spray cooler intake
contained low concentrations of octa-CDD and tetra-CDF homlogues. The
concentration of octa-CDD was measured at 0.02 ng/dscm and the concentration
of tetra-CDF was measured at 0.04 ng/dscm both which are near the detection
1imit.
Chloride emissions at the baghouse outlet exhaust stack were measured at
1.6 mg/dscm which corresponds to 3.4 mg/dscm @ 3% The average chlorides
emissions factor was calculated to be 39 milligrams of chloride emitted per
kilogram of reactivated carbon produced.
The furnace produced an average of 1080 kg/hr of reactivated carbon. The
spent carbon slurry contained 49.9 w% total volatiles, 36.5 w% moisture and
13.4 w% organics. Precursor analysis of the spent carbon slurry detected 2.9
ug/g of chlorobenzenes but polychlorinated biphenyls and chlorophenols were
not detected. The spent carbon slurry contained 6400 ug/g of total chlorides.
The plant considered the hearth temperatures confidential but the average
afterburner temperature was 950°C (1750°F). Average flue gas concentrations
measured at the baghouse outlet exhaust stack using Radian CEMs were: 02, 13.9
vol%, dry; C02, 13.2 vol % @ 3%, dry; CO, 88.5 ppmv @ 3% 02, dry; and THC, 3.0
ppmv 0 3% 02, wet.
2-7
-------
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
This section describes the host site (Site CRF-A), the carbon
regeneration furnace, and the emission control system that was tested. Data
summarizing the operations of the furnace and the control equipment are
presented in Section 4.0.
3.1 HOST SITE DESCRIPTION
The host site is an industrial carbon regeneration plant, permitted to
process up to 49,500 Kg/day (109,000 lbs/day) of spent carbon (bare carbon
basis). The spent carbon is returned from numerous plants that use activated
carbon for industrial wastewater treatment. The host site operates 24
hrs/day, 7 days/week for approximately 310 days/year. A 3 week shutdown
period is scheduled every year for reactivation furnace maintenance.
A flow diagram of the carbon regeneration process at Site CRF-A is shown
in Figure 3-1. Spent carbon is reactivated in a multiple-hearth furnace,
cooled in a quench tank, and stored prior to shipment. The furnace exhaust
gases pass through an afterburner, a spray cooler and a baghouse before being
exhausted to the atmosphere. The carbon regeneration furnace and afterburner/
spray cooler/baghouse emissions control system are described in more detail in
the following sections. The carbon regeneration furnace is referred to as
Furnace CRF-A in the remainder of the test plan.
3.2 CARBON REGENERATION FURNACE
Furnace CRF-A is a Herreschoff multiple-hearth furnace that was rebuilt
in 1980. The furnace fires an average of 13,000 cubic meters/day
(460,000 cu ft/day) of natural gas. The hearth temperatures can be controlled
over a range from 480°C to 1093°C (900°F to 2000°F). Some level of excess
oxygen is typically present throughout the furnace.
About four days worth of spent carbon feed is stored on-site in a water
slurry form. The carbon varies in size, but has a nominal 12x30 mesh
distribution. The moisture content of the spent carbon fed to the furnace is
3-1
-------
Exhaust Cat
to Atmosphere
Afterburner
Eihaust
Spent Carbon Ifom
Industrial Wastewater
Treatment Plant Uaara
Natural Gaa
Sodium Carbonata
Solution
Air
Atomizing Air
Stack
Spray Cooler
Exhaust
Natural Gae
Air
Regenerated Carbon to
Induatrlal Wastewater
Treatment Plant Users
Regenerated
Carbon
IO
Fan
Spent
Carbon
Storage
Tanks
Spray
Cooler
Quench
Tank
After-
burner
Multiple
Hearlh
Furnace
Regenerated
Carbon
Storage
T ank s
Figure 3-1. Process Flow Diagram of Carbon Rageneration Process.
-------
about 40 percent by weight, and the volatiles content is about 20 percent by
weight. The spent carbon feed may contain chlorinated organics from the
various wastewater treatment processes that use the carbon.
Spent carbon slurry is fed from a surge tank to a dewatering screw using
an on/off slurry valve. The dewatering screw feeds the spent carbon to the
top hearth of the furnace. In the furnace, the spent carbon is dried and the
organics on the carbon are distilled and burned as the carbon is reactivated.
The regenerated carbon drops from the bottom hearth of the furnace to a quench
tank and is stored as a slurry. Plant personnel report that residual organic
compounds are not detectable on the surface of the reactivated carbon.
The following parameters are recorded hourly in the regeneration furnace
control room: individual hearth temperatures, furnace draft, natural gas
usage for the furnace, and spent carbon slurry surge tank level.
3.3 EMISSIONS CONTROL SYSTEM
Emissions from furnace CRF-A are controlled by an afterburner, an
alkaline spray cooler, and a baghouse. The afterburner consists of a short
vertical section with natural gas fired burners and a long horizontal section
of refractory lined duct with no burners. Temperatures in the afterburner are
required by the operating permit to be in excess of 871°C (1600°F), and the
residence time of the afterburner chamber is a nominal 0.5 seconds.
Afterburner operating parameters monitored in the control room include
temperature, draft, and natural gas usage.
Exhaust gases from the afterburner are cooled by an alkaline spray
cooler. In the cooler, an atomized dilute alkaline solution is mixed with the
exhaust gas from the afterburner. The alkaline medium neutralizes acid gases
to permit compliance with regulatory emission limits.
From the spray cooler, the exhaust gases enter a four module baghouse.
The baghouse is rated for gas flows up to 620 SCMM (21,800 scfm). The
baghouse uses Teflon bags to remove fly ash and reaction products from the
upstream components. Collected particulate matter drops from the baghouse
hoppers to cardboard boxes. The dust is ultimately disposed of in a landfill.
3-3
-------
4.0 Test Results
The results of the Tier 4 emission test program at Carbon Regeneration
Furnace CRF-A are presented in this section. Three test runs (Runs 01-03)
were conducted. During each run, process operating data were collected, the
combustion gas products were continuously monitored, and samples were
collected for dioxin/furan, dioxin/furan precursor, and HC1 analyses. The
overall test log is presented in Section 4.1. The process operating data are
summarized in Section 4.2, and the combustion gas monitoring results are
presented in Section 4.3. The dioxin/furan emission results are presented in
Section 4.4. The results of sampling the exhaust gas for HC1 and the analysis
of the spent carbon feed for total chlorine are presented in Section 4.5.
Finally, the results of analysis for organic dioxin/furan precursors in the
spent carbon feed and the baghouse dust are presented in Section 4.6.
4.1 DESCRIPTION OF TEST PERIODS
Testing at carbon regeneration furnace CRF-A was conducted on three
consecutive days. During each test day gaseous samples were collected at the
baghouse exhaust, the afterburner exhaust and the furnace exhaust. The time
intervals during which each type of sample was collected are summarized in
Table 4-1. Grab samples of the spent carbon feed, the regenerated carbon
product, and the baghouse dust were collected at one hour intervals, beginning
at the start of each test run.
4.2 PROCESS DATA
Process data were obtained to document the regeneration furnace,
afterburner, and spray dryer/baghouse system operation during the test
periods. The purpose of collecting this information is to document the
between-run variations in operating conditions. The data are discussed
separately below.
4-1
-------
TABLE 4-1. SUMMARY OF TEST TIMES FOR EACH RUN, SITE CRF-A
Test Start/Stop Times
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Location/Sample Type
5/29/85
5/30/85
5/31/85
Afterburner Outlet
MM5
1445 - 1505
1440 - 1840
1010 - 1410
1520 - 1900
Baghouse Outlet
MM5
1450 - 1650
1440 - 1640
1002 - 1202
1704 - 1904
1650 - 1850
1213 - 1413
HC1
1453 - 1653
1443 - 1643
1105 - 1205
CEM
1315 - 1900
1440 - 1840
0955 - 1420
Process Samples
1430
1430
1030
1530
1530
1130
1630
1630
1230
1730
1730
1330
1830
1830
1430
4-2
-------
4.2.1 Carbon Regeneration Furnace Operation
The primary variables that were recorded to monitor the operating
condition of the furnace were the hearth temperatures. The host facility
considers the absolute value of the hearth temperatures to be proprietary.
The operating data were normalized based on the overall test average
temperature at each hearth to allow presentation of variation data while
maintaining confidentiality of the temperature values. The average
temperature was calculated using all the 1 hour data points that bracketed the
test run intervals. The percentage deviation from that average for each
hearth is shown in Figures 4-1 to 4-3, and is summarized in Table 4-2. During
the test runs the temperature distribution for the hearths was in the normal
range, which is 900 - 2000°F. The typical variation between runs is about +
10%, with the temperatures during Run 03 being generally lower. For all runs,
the temperature on Hearths 3, 5, and 7 showed the least variation. This is
expected since the process burners are located at these levels and are
temperature controlled. The spent carbon feed is fed to Hearth 1, and the
regenerated carbon falls from Hearth 7.
The furnace flue gas temperature changed between 10 to 20% at the end of
Run 01 and at the beginning of Run 02. The average daily carbon regeneration
rate and percent volatiles in the spent carbon for each day of testing are
presented in Table 4-3. During each test period the carbon feed conveyor v^as
operated at a constant, fixed rate.
A furnace breakdown occurred between the first and second test runs.
Repairs to the furnace rabble arms were completed on the morning of the second
test day. Testing was postponed until the afternoon to allow the furnace to
return to normal operating rates.
4.2.2 Afterburner Operation
The afterburner temperatures and induced draft at the afterburner are
listed in Table 4-4, and the trends are illustrated in Figure 4-4. The
average afterburner temperature was 24°F higher during Run 01 than during Runs
02 and 03. The afterburner operation was steady during the test periods and
no malfunctions occurred that required interruption of testing.
4-3
-------
10-1
to
-io-
• •
. • » ¦
Run 1
a/a»y«»
Ran 1 Ran 3
S/30/lfl A4«/31/S«
t • •
• 20- 1
1400
10-,
I I
20OO 1400
I I I
1000 0000 1400
10-
• o
A 3
• m
k'j
- a
ji *
-10-
-10-J I
MOO
I I
2000 1400 .
• •
I I I
3000 OSOO 1400
20-
10-
a
-10-
-20—' "
_L_
Figure 4-1. Hearth Temperature Variation,
Hearths 14 2, and Furnace
Flue Gaa
4-4
-------
ao-t
10-
10-
20 J
• • •
**•••* * *• •• •• •••
Run 1 Run a Run 3
S/29/8S 5/30/85 5/31/55
I II III
1400 3000 1400 3000 0000 1400
20-1
10-
• _ •
• • •
_L_ L
-ao-i
• •
ao
10 -
• • •
• • •
* • ~
-10-
-ao-i
Figure 4-2. Hearth Temperature Variation,
Hearths 3, 4, & 5
-------
20-,
10-
O
*
-10-
-ao-i
Ran 1
5/29/S0
Run 2
5/30/85
I
I I
1400 2000 1400
•• •
• • •
Run 3
5/31/85
I I I
2000 0900 1400
20-i
10-
»
O
*
-10
-20-
• •
• • •
Figure 4-3. Hearth Temperature Variation,
Hearths 6 & 7
4-6
-------
TABLE 4-2. FURNACE CRF-A HEARTH TEMPERATURE HISTORY3
DEVIATION FROM TEST AVERAGE (%)
Hearth
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Hearth 1
7.3
2.1
-11.0
Hearth 2
0.7
5.1
- 7.0
Hearth 3
0.4
0.7
- 1.2
Hearth 4
9.4
2.8
-14.2
Hearth 5
0.3
CO
o
1
0.5
Hearth 6
5.4
1
o
- 5.6
Hearth 7
-2.2
0.8
1.6
Flue Gas
3.2
4.4
- 8.7
aThe host plant considers the hearth temperature data confidential.
4-7
-------
TABLE 4-3. SUMMARY OF REGENERATOR FURNACE FEED CONDITIONS AT SITE CRF-A
Run No./
Date
Production Rate
(kg/hr)
Total Vol ati1es
% w/w
Moi sture
(% w/w)
Organics
(% w/w)
1 (5/29/85)
906
52.5
36.4
16.1
2 (5/30/85)
1184
48.8
37.2
11.6
3 (5/31/85)
1154
48.4
36.0
12.4
Average
1080
49.9
36.5
13.4
Note: All data reported on a bare carbon basis.
4-8
-------
TABLE 4-4. SUMMARY OF AFTERBURNER OPERATING DATA
Run No.
Time
Afterburner Temp.
Afterburner
Draft, "H20
1
1400
1750
1.0
5/29/85
1500
1760
1.0
1600
1750
1.0
1700
1770
1.5
1800
1780
1.0
1900
1770
1.7
2000
1770
1.0
Average
1764
1.2
2
1400
1740
1.0
5/30/85
1500
1740
1.1
1600
1740
1.4
1700
1740
0.7
1800
1740
0.7
1900
1730
1.0
2000
1740
1.5
Average
1739
1.1
3
0900
1740
.70
5/31/85
1000
1745
1.5
1100
1735
1.5
1200
--
1300
1735
1.2
1400
1745
1.2
Average
1740
1.2
Test Average
1748
1.2
4-9
-------
-p»
I
a
E
3
.a
h.
**
*•
<
1800
1760
1760
1740
1720
1700
• •
Run 01
1400
2000
I
Flfluf
Run 02 I | Run 03
1400 2000 0900 1400
I I I I
Tim*
Sit* CRF-A
Tim*
-------
4.2.3 Evaporative Cooler - Baghouse Operation
The operating lSvels of key variables in the emission control system are
summarized in Table 4-5. The data show that the emission control system was
operated similarly during the three test runs.
The baghouse cleaning cycle was controlled by the total pressure drop
across the bags. During the test periods, the average pressure drop across
the baghouse was 5.6 inches of water. The average dust collection rate for
the 24-hour periods during which testing was conducted was 200 pounds per
hour. This rate was determined by weighing each dust collection container and
recording the time at which it was replaced.
The evaporative cooler water injection rate averaged 24 gallons per
minute during the tests. The alkali soultion makeup rate was constant at 3.5
gallons per minute.
4.3. FLUE GAS PARAMETER DATA
The characteristics of flue gas at the sampling locations are summarized
in Table 4-6. The oxygen and carbon dioxide content of the flue gas was
measured at the top of the furnace before the afterburner. The average oxygen
content was 7.4 volume percent and the CO2 content was 13.0 volume percent
corrected to 3% Oj. The excess oxygen was calculated to be 75 percent at the
furnace outlet. [The plant reports 1-5% Og at the top hearth.]
At the spray cooler inlet, the average volumetric flowrate at actual
conditions was 1360 acmm and at dry standard conditions, the average
volumetric flowrate was 250 dscmm. The average moisture content at the spray
cooler inlet was 27 volume percent and the average temperature was 854°C. The
average oxygen content was measured at 8.9 volume percent.
At the baghouse outlet, the average volumetric flowrate at actual
conditions and dry, standard conditions were 925 acmm and 380 dscmm
respectively. The average moisture content of the flue gas was 36 volume
percent, and the average temperature was 170°C. The oxygen concentration in
the flue gas at the baghouse outlet was measured by the Radian CEM system at
4-11
-------
TABLE 4-5. SUMMARY OF EVAPORATIVE COOLER--BAGHOUSE OPERATING DATA
Run No. Time (gpm)
Evaporative Cooler Baqhouse
Inlet Outlet Outlet
Water Flow Temp. Temp. P Temp.
F F (in H-0) °F
1
1400
22
1740
400
4.5
350
5/29/85
1500
22
1710
400
4.0
350
1600
22
1710
400
4.5
350
1700
22
1710
400
6.0
350
1800
24
1720
400
5.0
350
1900
24
1740
400
5.5
350
2000
24
1740
400
5.5
350
Average
23
1724
400
5.0
350
2
1400
23
1700
400
5.0
350
5/30/85
1500
23
1690
400
7.5
350
1600
24
1690
400
6.0
350
1700
24
1700
400
6.5
350
1800
24
1700
400
6.0
350
1900
24
1710
400
6.0
350
2000
24
1710
400
6.0
350
Average
24
1700
400
6.1
350
3
0900
24
1670
400
6.0
350
5/31/85
1000
24
1670
400
6.0
350
1100
24
1650
400
5.5
350
1200
25
1670
400
5.5
350
1300
24
1700
400
6.0
350
1400
25
1700
400
5.0
350
Average
24
1677
400
5.7
350
Test Average
24
1700
400
5.6
350
4-12
-------
TABLE 4-6. SUMMARY OF FLUE GAS PARAMETERS AT SITE CRF-A
Flue gas parameters
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Average
Furnace Outlet:
Oxygen content (vol %) dry
Carbon dioxide content (vol%,
dry, corrected to 3% Og)
7.6
14.1
6.5
11.4
7.8
13.5
7.4
13.0
SDrav cooler inlet:
Temperature ( C)
852
840
871
854
Moisture (Vol %)
27
27
27
27
Volumetric Flowrate
Actual (acmm)
1270
1320
1500
1360
Dry standard (dscmm)
235
245
270
250
EPA Method 3:
Oxygen content (vol%) dry
Carbon dioxide content (vol%,
corrected to 3% 02, dry)
9.3
11.6
8.4
10.9
8.9
11.8
8.9
11.4
Baahouse outlet:
Temperature ( C)
171
174
167
170
Moisture (vol%)
36
36
35
36
Volumetric Flowrate
Actual (acmm)
850
900
1025
925
Dry standard (dscmm)
355
365
430
380
Oxygen content (vol%, dry)
Radian CEM
13.5
13.7
14.5
13.9
EPA Method 3
14.0
13.7
14.6
14.1
Carbon dioxide content (vol%,
corrected to 3% 0-, dry)
Radian CEM
13.3
13.2
13.2
EPA Method 3
12.7
12.2
11.9
12.3
Metric units are reported for all flue gas measurement data. To convert to
English units:
F = 1.8 x C + 32
cfm = cmm x 35.3
Standard EPA conditions are 20°C (69°F) and 1 atm.
4-13
-------
13.9 volume percent and by EPA Method 3 at 14.1 volume percent. The CEM and
EPA Method 3 data agreed within the measurement error of the methods.
The volumetric flowrate at both the inlet and outlet have the same
increasing variation, but the variation was less than 10 percent from the mean
value. Therefore, the flue gas parameters are considered consistent between
runs.
4.4 CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING DATA
The mean values and standard deviations of the combustion gases at the
baghouse outlet are shown for each Run in Table 4-7. The average results for
the three test runs are: oxygen, 13.9 percent by volume (dry); carbon
dioxide, 13.2 percent by volume (dry, normalized to 3% O2); carbon monoxide,
88 ppm by volume (dry, 0 3% 02); and total hydrocarbons, 3 ppm by volume (wet*
at 3% O2). The combustion gas results have been adjusted to a 3% oxygen basis
for comparions to other combustion sources in the Tier 4 program.
The mean oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations were relatively
consistent between runs. The calculated result for carbon dioxide (4.1%) for
Run 1 is not valid because of a hardware failure in the computer data system.
This result is not included in the test overall average. The carbon monoxide
results were more variable than any other combustion product. During Run 01,
a significant increase in the CO concentration occurred, and was accompanied
by an increase in the total hydrocarbon concentration. A decrease in the
oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration also occurred. However, this was the
only case where there was a detectable correlation between CO and THC
concentrations, and the oxygen concentration.
The five minute average values of the combustion products are listed in
Appendix A.3. The results are presented versus time in trend plots in
Figures 4-5 to 4-8.
4-14
-------
TABLE 4-7. MEAN VALUES AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF CONTINUOUSLY
MONITORED COMBUSTION GASES AT OUTLET LOCATION
Parameter3''5'0
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Average
0- (% vol)
Standard Deviation
13.5
(0.3)
13.7
(0.2)
14.5
(0.3)
13.9
CO (ppmv @ 3% 0-)
Standard Deviation
121.1
(281.8)
33.6
(25.5)
110.8
(48.4)
88.5
C02 (% vol 9 3% 0-)
Standard Deviation
4.1d
(0.3)
13.3
(0.4)
13.2
(0.4)
13.2
THC (ppmv @ 3% 0-)
Standard Deviation
4.7
(7.2)
2.3
(0.8)
1.9
(0.6)
3.0
aGas sampling for the continuous monitors was performed at the afterburner
exhaust outlet location.
bAll concentrations expressed on a dry volume basis except for total
hydrocarbon concentrations, which are expressed on a wet volume basis.
cTotal hydrocarbon data are expressed in units of ppmv (wet) as propane.
^Invalid data record, not included in average.
4-15
-------
SITE 09 - TEST 1
oxvoex p^oriLC
"EANj 17.6/. V 02
STD. DEV. : 0. TV. V
INSTRUMENT RANGEs 0-237.
TEST TTMC (wOU»S>
SITE 09 - TEST 2
OXYGD4 PROFILE
¦¦«UU">JU
"CAN j l~.7V.
sto. oev.j 0.3"/.
INSTRUMENT RANGE:
0-ssy. v or
3 3
TQT rtkAC (HOURS)
bilL 09 - ItlST 3
0*roeN P^once
Bm,mwnr md.
liCANi
STO. DEV. i 0.;-/.
INSTRUMENT RANGE J
14.sr. v 02
Q-zzr. v or
TQT T1MC (HOURS)
Figure 4-5. Oxygen Concentration History at the Baghouse Outlet
4-16
-------
SITE 09 - TEST
CMOON GtOXiOC PROTILt
1
MTANi 4. \ V. V COZ
-------
SITE 09 - TEST 1
CARSON MONOXOE p*orn-c
a.e |
a.a - .
a.2 - |.
§
k
>n ,.a
TQT TIMC (MOU»V
NEftNl 121.1 oomv CO
-------
SITE 09 - TEST 1
total Hraf*o£A«aoN oaohlc
TOT Ttwc
-------
4.5 DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS DATA
Dioxin/furan concentrations and mass flow rates measured at the spray
cooler inlet and baghouse outlet stack are summarized in Tables 4-8 and 4-9
for the 2378 TCDD, total PCDD, and total PCDF species. The entire MM5 train,
which included the filter, primary XAD sorbent trap, impingers, and sample
train clean-up was analyzed. All dioxin/furan analyses for Site CRF-A samples
were performed by EMSL-RTP and ECL-Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, 1 aboratories.
two of the three EPA laboratories known as the Troika.
At the spray cooler inlet, the average as-measured concentrations were
0.06 ng/dscm for 2378 TCDD, 20.9 ng/dscm for total PCDD and 50.1 ng/dscm for
total PCDF. The concentrations were corrected to 3% using the Radian EPA
Method 3 data and were 0.09 ng/dscm @ 3% for 2378 TCDD, 28.8 ng/dscm 0 3%
0^ for total PCDD and 70.1 ng/dscm @ 3% for total PCDD. The average
mass flow rates were 0.96 ug/hr for 2378 TCDD, 310 ug/hr for total PCDD and
754 ug/hr for total PCDF.
At the baghouse outlet exhaust stack, 2378 TCDD was not detected in the
flue gas. However, the as-measured concentrations for total PCDDs and total
PCDFs were 1.42 ng/dscm and 1.28 ng/dscm respectively. The concentrations
were corrected to 3% oxygen using Radian CEM data and were 3.69 ng/dscm
@ 3% Og for total PCDD and 3.32 ng/dscm @ 3% Og for total PCDF. The average
emission rates were 31.6 ug/hr for total PCDD and 28.8 ug/hr for total PCDF.
The inlet and outlet dioxin/furan concentrations are corrected to 3
percent oxygen for comparison. For both total PCDD and total PCDF, the inlet
concentrations ^ere significantly higher than the outlet concentration. The
inlet total PCDD concentration was 28.8 ng/dscm 0 3% O2 and the outlet total
PCDD concentration was 3.69 ng/dscm @ 3% 0^. For total PCDF the inlet
concentration was 70.1 ng/dscm @ 3% 0£ and the outlet concentration was 3.32
ng/dscm @ 3% O2-
4.5.1 Isomer and Homoloque Specific Data at the Spray Cooler Inlet
Isomer and homologue specific dioxin/furan concentration data at the
spray cooler inlet are summarized in Table 4-10 and 4-11 for the three test
runs. Run-specific data tables showing homologue emissions concentration in
ng/dscm, parts-per-trillion, and ug/hr units are included in Appendix H.
4-20
-------
TABLE 4-8. OVERVIEW OF DIOXIN AND FURAN FLUE GAS
CONCENTRATION DATA FOR SITE CRF-A
Run Number
Flue Gas
Concentration
(nq/dscm)
2378 TCDD
Total PCDD
Total PCDF
nq/dscm (as-measured)
Baghouse Outlet:.
Run 1
ND
2.45
1.53
Run 2
ND
1.08
1.38
Run 3
ND
0.74
0.92
Average
ND
1.42
1.28
Spray Cooler Inlet:
Run 1
0.05
26.2
42.9
Run 2
0.05
21.2
56.0
Run 3
0.09
15.4
51.2
Average
0.06
20.9
50.1
nq/dscm @ 3% 0„
Baghouse Outlet:
Run 1
ND.
6.32
3.95
Run 2
ND
2.68
3.40
Run 3
ND
2.08
2.60
Average
ND
3.69
3.32
Spray Cooler Inlet:
Run 1
0.07
35.1
57.5
Run 2
0.06
26.1
69.3
Run 3
0.14
25.1
83.4
Average
0.09
28.8
70.1
ND - not detected
.9
ng = 1 x 10 g
4-21
-------
TABLE 4-9. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN AND FURAN MASS FLOW RATE DATA FOR SITE CRF-A
Mass Flow Rate (ug/hr)
Run Number 2378-TCDD Total PCDD Total PCDF
Spray Cooler Inlet:
Run 1
0.72
368
602
Run 2
0.73
313
828
Run 3
1.44
250
832
Average
0.96
310
754
Emission Rate (ug/hr)
Baghouse Outlet:
Run 1 ND 52.0 32.5
Run 2 ND 23.9 30.3
Run 3 ND 19.0 23.7
Average ND 31.6 28.8
ND = not detected
4-22
-------
TABLE 4-10. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN/FURAN FLUE GAS DATA AT
THE SPRAY COOLER INLET FOR SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Concentration
in Flue Gas
Isomer
(ng/dscm)
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
5.12E-02
4.95E-02
8.87E-02
6.31E-02
Other TCDD
9.21E-01
8.66E-01
3.08E+00
1.62E+00
Penta-CDD
2.02E+00
4.70E-01
2.51E+00
1.67E+00
Hexa-CDD
6.04E+00
2.90E+00
3.64E+00
4.19E+00
Hepta-CDD
7.95E+00
6.26E+00
3.97E+00
6.06E+00
Octa-CDD
9.1-8E+00
1.06E+01
2.13E+00
7.32E+00
Total PCDD
2.62E+01
2.12E+01
1.54E+01
2.09E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
8.95E-01
1.16E+00
9.31E-01
9.97E-01
Other TCDF
1.22E+01
1.73E+01
1.40E+01
1.45E+01
Penta-CDF
8.77E+00
9.36E+00
1.25E+01
1.02E+01
Hexa-CDF
1.04E+01
1.23E+01
1.14E+01
'1.13E+01
Hepta-CDF
7.29E+00
I.11E+01
8.96E+00
9.12E+00
Octa-CDF
3.35E+00
4.88E+00
3.46E+00
3.90E+00
Total PCDF
4.29E+01
5.60E+01
5.12E+01
5.01E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
ng = 1.0E-09g
8760 operating hours per year
4-23
-------
TABLE 4-11. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN/FURAN FLUE GAS DATA AT
THE SPRAY COOLER INLET FOR SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% Oxygen)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Concentration
in Flue Gas
Isomer
(ng/dscm @ 3% oxygen)
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
6.86E-02
6.12E-02
1.44E-01
9.14E-02
Other TCDD
1.23E+00
1.07E+00
5.02E+00
2.44E+00
Penta-CDD
2.71F.+00
5.82E-01
4.08E+00
2.46E+00
Hexa-CDD
8.10E+00
3.58E+00
5.92E+00
5.87E+00
Hepta-CDD
1.07E+01
7.75E+00
6.46E+00
8.29E+00
Octa-CDD
1.23E+01
1.32E+01
3.46E+00
9.65E+00
Total PCDD
3.51E+01
2.62E+01
2.51E+01
2.88E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1.20E+00
1.44E+00
1.52E+00
1.39E+00
Other TCDF
1.63E+01
2.14E+01
2.28E+01
2.02E+01
Penta-CDF
1.18E+01
1.16E+01
2.04E+01
1.46E+01
Hexa-CDF
1.40E+0I
1.52E+01
1.85-E+01
1.59E+01
Hepta-CDF
9.78E+00
1.37E+01
1.46E+01
1.27E+01
Octa-CDF
4.49E+00
6.03E+00
5.63E+00
5.39E+00
Total PCDF
5.75E+01
6.93E+01
8.34E+01
7.01E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
ng = 1.0E-09g
8760 operating hours per year
4-24
-------
All dioxin and furan homologues were detected at the spray cooler inlet.
The relative distribution of the dioxin and furan isomers are shown
graphically in Figure 4-9. Hepta- and octa-TCDD were the most prevalent
dioxin homologues and accounted for 30 mole % each of the total PCDDs.
Hexa-CDD was next at 20 mole %, followed by penta-CDD and other TCDD each at
10 mole%. 2378 TCDD accounted for less than one percent of the dioxin
homologues. For the furan homologues other TCDF was the most predominant
homologue at 30 mole %, while 2378 TCDF made up only 2 mole %. Penta-CDF,
hexa-CDF and hepta-CDF each shared 20 mole % of the homologues and octa- CDF
made up the remaining 8 mole %.
Isomer and homologue specific mass flow factors for the spray cooler
inlet are summarized in Table 4-12. The mass flow factors are reported as
micrograms of isomer per kilograms of bare carbon produced. The average
mass flow factors for total PCDD and total PCDF were 0.30 ug/kg and 0.70
ug/kg, respectively. Since the production rates of bare carbon are consistent
between test runs, the dioxin/furan mass flow factors have the same
variability as the dioxin/furan concentrations.
4.5.2. Isomer and Homologue Specific Data at the Baghouse Outlet
Isomer and homologue specific emission concentration data, at the
baghouse outlet stack are summarized in Table 4-13 and 4-14 for the three test
runs. 2378 TCDD and 2378 TCDF were not detected at the baghouse outlet stack.
Also, other TCDDs were not detected during Run 2. Penta-CDD was not detected
during Run 3, and penta-CDD concentration were very near the detection limit
for Runs 1 and 2.
Run-specific data tables showing homologue emission concentrations in
both ng/dscm, parts-per-trillion and emission rates in ug/hr units are
included in Appendix H.
The relative distributions of the dioxin and furan homologues are shown
graphically in Figure 4-10. For the dioxin homologues, hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD
and octa-CDD were evenly distributed each at 25 mole %. Other TCDD made up 15
mole % and penta-CDD made up 10 mole % of the dioxin homologues. For the
furan homologues, other TCDF dominated with 40 mole %. Penta-CDF, hexa-CDF,
hepta-CDF and octa-CDF equally shared the remaining 60 mole %.
4-25
-------
DIOXIN HOMOLOGUES AT THE INLET
CRF-A
28.8 ng/dscm at 3% 0«
PCDD
1
2378 TCDD Oth«r TCDD Ponta-CDD Haxa—CDO Hopta-CDD Octa-CDD
DIOXIN HOMOLOCUE
ZZ1 RUN 01 T77A RUN 02 PTXi RUN 03
FURAN HOMOLOGUES AT THE INLET
CRF-A
1
0.9 -
0.8 -
0.7 -
0.6 -
O.S -
PCDF = 70.1 ng/dscm at 3% Ou
2378 TCDF Oth«r TCDF Penta-CDF Haxa—CDF Hepta—CDF Octa-CDF
FTJRAN HOMOLOCUE
1771 RUN 01 £2Zl RUN 02 ESI RUN 03
Figure 4-9. Homologue distribution at the spray cooler inlet.
4-26
-------
TABLE 4-12. DIOXIN/FURAN MASS FLOW FACTORS AT THE
SPRAY COOLER INLET FOR
SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
T c Amay*
Dioxin/Furan Emission Factors (ug/kg)
I J UltlC 1
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
0I0XINS
2378 TCDO
7.93E-04
6.17E-04
1.25E-03
8.86E-04
Other TCDD
1.43E-02
1.08E-02
4.34E-02
2.28E-02
Penta-CDD
3.13E-02
5.87E-03
3.53E-02
2.41E-02
Hexa-CDD
9.36E-02
3.61E-02
5.12E-02
6.03E-02
Hepta-CDD
1.23E-01
7.81E-02
5.58E-02
8.58E-02
Octa-COD
1.42E-01
1.33E-01
2.99E-02
1.02E-01
Total PCDO
4.06E-01
2.64E-01
2.17E-01
2.96E-01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1.39E-02
1.45E-02
1.31E-02
1.38E-02
Other TCDF
1.89E-01
2.15E-01
1.97E-01
2.00E-01
Penta-CDF
1.36E-01
1.17E-01
1.76E-01
1.43E-01
Hexa-COF
1.61E-01
1.53E-01
1.60E-01
1.58E-01
Hepta-CDF
1.13E-01
1.39E-01
1.26E-01
1.26E-01
Octa-CDF
5.19E-02
6.08E-02
4.87E-02
5.38E-02
Total PCDF
6.65E-01
6.99E-01
7.21E-01
6.95E-01
ND = not detected
(detection limit
in parentheses)
ug = 1.OE-06g
8760 operating hours
per year
4-27
-------
TABLE 4-13. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS DATA
AT THE OUTLET STACK FOR SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Concentration
in Flue Gas
Isomer
(ng/dscm)
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND(
1.79E-01)
ND(
5.29E-02)
ND(
4.61E-02)
.OOE+OO
Other TCDD
5.87E-01
ND(
7.94E-02)
6.91E-02
2.19E-01
Penta-CDD
3.83E-01
1.32E-01
ND(
1.15E-01)
1.72E-01
Hexa-CDD
6.12E-01
3.17E-01
2.07E-01
3.79E-01
Hepta-CDD
4.59E-01
3.44E-01
2.30E-01
3.45E-01
Octa-CDD
4.08E-01
2.91E-01
2.30E-01
3.10E-01
Total PCDD
2.45E+00
1.08E+00
7.37E-01
1.42E+00
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND(
1.53E-01)
ND(
1.59E-01)
ND(
9.22E-02)
.OOE+OO
Other TCDF
5.36E-01
5.29E-01
3.23E-01
4.62E-01
Penta-CDF
1.53E-01
2.91E-01
ND(
1.15E-01)
1.48E-01
Hexa-CDF
2.81E-01
2.12E-01
1.84E-01
2.26E-01
Hepta-CDF
3.32E-01
2.12E-01
1.61E-01
2.35E-01
Octa-CDF
2.30E-01
1.32E-01
2.53E-01
2.05E-01
Total PCDF
1.53E+00
1.38E+00
9.22E-01
1.28E+00
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
ng = 1.0E-09g
8760 operating hours per year
4-28
-------
TABLE 4-14. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS DATA
AT THE OUTLET STACK FOR SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% Oxygen)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Concentration
in Flue Gas
Isomer
(ng/dscm @ 3% oxygen)
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
4.61E-01)
ND(
1.31E-01)
ND(
1.30E-01)
. 00E+00
Other TCDD
1.52E+00
ND(
1.96E-01)
1.95E-01
5.70E-01
Penta-CDD
9.88E-01
3.27E-01
ND(
3.25E-01)
4.38E-01
Hexa-CDD
1.58E+00
7.84E-01
5.84E-01
9.83E-01
Hepta-CDD
1.19E+00
8.49E-01
6.49E-01
8.95E-01
Octa-CDD
1.05E+00
7.19E-01
6.49E-01
8.07E-01
Total PCDD
6.32E+00
2.68E+00
2.08E+00
3.69E+00
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND(
3.95E-01)
ND(
3.92E-01)
ND(
2.60E-01)
.00E+00
Other TCDF
1.38E+00
1.31E+00
9.09E-01
1.20E+00
Penta-CDF
3.95E-01
7.19E-01
ND(
3.25E-01)
3.71E-01
Hexa-CDF
7.25E-01
5.23E-01
5.19E-01
5.89E-01
Hepta-CDF
8.56E-01
5.23E-01
4.54E-01
6.I1E-01
Octa-CDF
5.93E-01
3.27E-01
7.14E-01
5.44E-01
Total PCDF
3.95E+00
3.40E+00
2.60E+00
3.32E+00
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
NO = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
ng = 1.0E-09g
8760 operating hours per year
4-29
-------
DIOXIN HOMOLOGUES AT THE OUTLET
CRF-A
3.7 ng/dscm at 3% 0«
PCDD
%
1
237B TCDD Othar TCDD Ponta-CDD Haxa—COD Hepta-CDD Octa-CDD
DIOXIN HOMOLOGUE
cm run oi V77X run 02 ptxi run 03
FURAN HOMOLOGUES AT THE OUTLET
CRF-A
PCDF = 3.3 ng/dscm at 3% 02
m
2378 TCDF Othar TCDF Panta-CDF Haxa—CDF Hapta—CDF Octa-CDF
t7"71 RUN 01
FURAN HOMOLOGUE
J777X RUN 02 PTKi RUN 03
Figure 4-10. Homologue distribution at the baghouse outlet.
4-30
-------
Dioxin and furan emission factors for the baghouse outlet exhaust stack
are summarized in Table 4-15. The emission factors are reported as micrograms
of isomer per kilogram of bare carbon produced. The average emission factors
for total PCDD and total PCDF were 0.031 ug/kg and 0.027 ug/kg, respectively.
The emission factors have the same variability as the dioxin/furan
concentrations since the production rates were consistent between test runs.
4.5.3 Reduction of Dioxin/Furan Concentrations Due to the Particulate
Control Device
Some of the dioxin/furans contained in the stack gas are removed by the
spray cooler/baghouse system. The dioxin/furan removal efficiency of the
spray cooler/baghouse system is calculated from the difference betweem the
inlet and outlet concentration of each dioxin/furan homologue divided by the
inlet concentration of each homologue. Each flue gas concentration value is*-
considered to have an analytical uncertainty of + 50%. An analysis of the
corresponding uncertainty of the measured control device efficiency values
(contained in Appendix I) indicates that with a measured efficiency of greater
than 66.7%, the true removal efficiency is most likely positive. With a.
measured efficiency between 66.7% and -200%, a definite conclusion cannot be
drawn concerning the true removal efficiency and below -200%, the true removal
efficiency is most likely negative.
The spray cooler/baghouse removal efficiencies for each dioxin/furan
homologue are summarized in Table 4-16. The measured removal efficiencies for
all the homologues are above 66.7% indicating that the baghouse positively
controls dioxin/furan emissions at Site CRF-A (i.e., analytical uncertainties
do not obscure the ability to adequately measure the control device
efficiency). The average measured removal efficiencies for total PCDD and
total PCDF were 87 percent and 95 percent respectively.
4.6 SPENT CARBON FEED PRECURSOR DATA
The spent carbon feed slurry which is fed into Furnace CRF-A was analyzed
for chlorinated benzenes, chlorinated phenols, total organic halogens and
total chlorides. These compounds are believed to be dioxin/furan precursors
4-31
-------
TABLE 4-15. DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION FACTORS AT
THE OUTLET STACK FOR SITE CRF-A
Oioxin/Furan
-
Dioxin/Furan Emission Factors
; (ug/kg)
Isomer
Run 01
Run 02
Run 03
Avg.
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND(
4.18E-03)
ND (
9.84E-04)
ND (
1.03E-03)
. OOE+OO
Other TCDD
1.37E-02
ND(
1.48E-03)
1.54E-03
5.09E-03
Penta-CDD
8.96E-03
2.46E-03
ND(
2.57E-03)
3.81E-03
Hexa-CDD
1.43E-02
5.90E-03
4.62E-03
8.29E-03
Hepta-CDD
1.08E-02
6.39E-03
5.13E-03
7.43E-03
Octa-CDD
9.56E-03
5.41E-03
5.13E-03
5.7OE-03
Total PCDD
5.74E-02
2.02E-02
1.64E-02
3.13E-02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND(
3.59E-03)
ND(
2.95E-03)
ND(
2.05E-03)
.00E+00
Other TCOF
1.25E-0Z
9.84E-03
7.19E-03
9.86E-03
Penta-CDF
3.59E-03
5.41E-03
ND{
2.57E-03)
3.00E-03
Hexa-CDF
6.57E-03
3.94E-03
4.11E-03
4.87E-03
Hepta-CDF
7.77E-03
3.94E-03
3.59E-03
5.10E-03
Octa-CDF
5.38E-03
2.46E-03
5.65E-03
4.49E-03
Total PCDF
3.59E-02
2.56E-02
2.05E-02
2.73E-02
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
ug = 1.0E-06g
8760 operating hours per year
NOTE: Emission factors are based on the bare carbon production rate of the
furnace (kg/hr).
4-32
-------
TABLE 4-16. SRAY COOLER/BAGHOUSE SYSTEM REMOVAL
EFFICIENCIES AT SITE CRF-A
Baghouse Removal Efficiency (%)
Homologue Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Other TCDD
-23.6
100.0
96.1
76.6
Penta-CDD
63.5
43.8
100.0
82.2
Hexa-CDD
80.5
78.1
90.1
83.3
Hepta-CDD
88.9
89.0
90.0
89.2
Octa-CDD
91.5
94.6
81.2
91.6
Total PCDD
82.0
89.8
91.7
87.2
Furans
2378 TCDF
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Other TCDF
91.5
. 93.9
96.0
94.1
Penta-CDF
96.7
93.8
100.0
97.5
Hexa-CDF
94.8
96.6
97.2
96.3
Hepta-CDF
91.2
96.2
96.9
95.2
Octa-CDF
86.8
94.6
87.3
89.9
Total PCDF
93.1
95.1
96.9
95.3
4-33
-------
which when present in the feed will contribute to the formation of
dioxin/furans during~combustion.
The results of the precursor analyses are summarized in Table 4-17.
Chlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated phenols were not detected in the feed
samples, but an average of 2.9 ppm of chlorinated benzenes were detected.
Mostly trichlorobenzenes were detected with a small amount of dichlorobenzenes
and tetrachlorobenzenes. The compound-specific precursor results are included
in Appendix E. Run 03 carbon feed samples contained significantly more
chlorobenzenes (6.6 ppm) then Run 01 or Runs 02 samples (1.8 and 0.2 ppm,
respectively)
The average chlorides content of the spent carbon slurry was 6400 ppm.
Also, the total organic halogen (TOX) analysis detected 154 ug/g of T0X in the
spent carbon slurry feed.
4.7 HC1 TRAIN CHLORIDES EMISSIONS DATA
At Site CRF-A, HC1 emissions are controlled by a sodium carbonate spray
cooler which neutralizes HC1 in the flue gas entering the baghouse. The HC1
train emissions data measured at the baghouse outlet exhaust stack are
summarized in Table 4-18. The data are reported as front half, back half and
train total chloride emissions. The front half emissions represent chlorides
captured in the probe rinse and filter fractions of the HC1 train and the back
half emissions represent chlorides captured in the HCL sample train impingers.
The train total emissions represent the sum of the front half and back half
emi ssions.
The average front half chlorides concentration was 1.73 mg/dscm @ 3% O2
and the average back half chlorides concentration was 1.69 mg/dscm @ 3% 0^.
The average total chlorides concentration was 3.44 mg/dscm @ 3% O2. The
average total chlorides emission rate was 0.040 kg/hr.
Compared with other Tier 4 test sites, the chlorides emissions for Site
CRF-A are in the low range. For all test sites for which HCL sampling was
performed the chlorides emissions ranged from 2.4 to 880 mg/dscm @ 3% O2
(0.001 to 3.8 gr/dscf (? 3% 02).
4-34
-------
TABLE 4-17. SUMMARY OF DIOXIN PRECURSOR DATA
FOR SITE CRF-A FEED SAMPLES
Precursor Categories
Precursor Concentration, ua/a
(DDm)
Soent Carbon Feed SamDles
Run 1 Run 2
Run 3
Averaae
Total
Chlorinated Benzenes3
1.76 0.16
6.63
2.85
Total
Chlorinated Biphenyls
0 0
0
0
Total
Chlorinated Phenols
0 0
0
0
Total
Chlorides
4950 8387
5900
6400
Total
Organic Halogen (TOX)
NA NA
154
154
aMostly trichlorobenzenes were detected with a small amount of
dichlorobenzenes and tetrachlorobenzenes. See Appendix E for
compound-specific data.
NA = not analyzed.
4-35
-------
TABLE 4-18. CHLORIDE CONCENTRATIONS AT THE OUTLET STACK FOR SITE CRF-A
Emi ssions
Sample
Test
a
mg/dscm
Rate
Component
Run
mg/dscm
ppmv
0 3% 02
(kg/hr)
Train Total
01
1.049
0.71
1.72
0.023
02
1.707
1.16
2.89
0.040
03
2.019
1.37
5.65
0.056
Average
1.592
1.08
3.44
0.040
Front Half
01
0.588
0.399
0.97
0.013
02
1.043
0.708
1.76
0.024
03
0.878
0.596
2.46
0.024
Average
0.836
0.568
1.73
0.023
Back Half
01
0.461
0.313
0.76
0.010
02
0.664
0.451
1.12
0.016
03
1.141
0.775
3.19
0.032
Average
0.755
0.513
1.69
0.019
appmv = parts per million chloride by volume, dry basis at actual stack oxygen
concentration.
''Concentration corrected to 3% using the following correction factor:
(20.9 - 3) i (20.9 - %02 measured)
Oxygen values are from Radian CEM data in Table 4-7.
4-36
-------
4.8 DIOXIN/FURAN RESULTS OF BAGHOUSE ASH
The results of the dioxin/furan analysis of the baghouse ash samples are
summarized in Table 4-19. 2378 TCDD and 2378 TCDF were not detected in the
baghouse ash. Hexa-CDF, hepta-CDF and octa-CDF were not detected in some runs
and were close to the detection limit in other runs. The total average PCDD
and total average PCDF were 1.1 ppb and 0.5 ppb, respectively. The results
were consistent between runs.
4.9 DIOXIN/FURAN RESULTS AND PRECURSOR RESULTS OF AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING
The ambient air in the general vicinity of the atomizing air intake point
to the spray cooler was sampled for dioxin/furans. The sample was a composite
taken over the three day test period. The results of the dioxin/furan
analysis are summarized in Table 4-20. A small amount of octa-CDD and
tetra-CDF were detected, but at concentrations very near the detection limit.
Total PCDD was measured at 0.02 ng/dscm (0.001 ppt) and total PCDF was
measured at 0.04 ng/dscm (0.003 ppt).
Due to a broken impinger in the ambient air train on the second date of
sampling, the sample volume was adjusted. Approximately 20 percent of the
sample volume was believed to have not been drawn through the sorbent module.
Therefore, these dioxin/furan concentrations may have a slightly high bias.
4.10 DIOXIN/FURAN RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLING
The soil sample was archived pending evaluation of analytical data.
4.11 DIOXIN/FURAN RESULTS OF REACTIVATED CARBON SAMPLING
The reactivated carbon sample was archived pending evaluation of
analytical data.
4-37
-------
TABLE 4-19. RESULTS OF DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS OF
BAGHOUSE ASH SAMPLES AT SITE CRF-A
Homologue
Run 1
Parts per Billion (ppb)
Run 2 Run 3 Average
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
NR
NR
ND (0.01)
ND
Other TCDD
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
Penta-CDD
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
Hexa-CDD
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
Hepta-CDD
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Octa-CDD
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
Total PCDD
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
Furans
2378 TCDF
NR
NR
ND (0.03)
ND
Other TCDF
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Penta-CDF
0.1
0.2
0.06
0.1
Hexa-CDF
ND (0.02)
ND (0.04)
0.1
0.05
Hepta-CDF
ND (0.05)
0.04
ND (0.06)
ND
Octa-CDF
ND (0.05)
'0.03
0.02
0.03
Total PCDF
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.5
NR = not reported by Troika.
ND = not detected, minium detection limit is in parenthesis.
4-38
-------
TABLE 4-20. AMBIENT DIOXIN/FURAN CONCENTRATIONS IN VICINITY
" OF ATOMIZING AIR INTAKE POINT TO SPRAY COOLER
Homologue
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Other TCDD
Penta-CDD
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-CDD
Total PCDD
Furans
2378 TCDF
Other TCDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDf
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
Total PCDF
ng/dscm
NO (0.01)
ND (0.01)
ND (0.01)
ND (0.02)
ND (0.03)
0.02
0.02
NR
0.04
ND (0.02)
ND (0.01)
ND (0.01)
ND (0.02)
0.04
ND = not detected, minimum detection limit is indicated
in parenthesis.
NR = not reported by Troika.
4-39
-------
5.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND PROCEDURES
Samples were collected from seven different locations at Site CRF-A.
Four of the locations were for gaseous sampling and three were for solids
sampling. The test matrix is described in Section 5.1, and the process data
collection procedures are described in Section 5.2. The sampling locations
and procedures are presented in Sections 5.3 and 5.4, respectively.
5.1 TEST DESCRIPTION
The source sampling and analytical matrix used at Site CRF-A is shown in
Table 5-1, and the sampling locations are identified in Figure 5-1. Three
test runs (Runs 01-03) were performed on three contiguous days. During each
run, dioxin/furan samples were collected at the afterburner exhaust and after*
the spray dryer/baghouse system. Also at the baghouse outlet exhaust stack,
samples were collected for total chloride measurement and continuous
monitoring of combustion gases was conducted. Samples collected at the
furnace exhaust, afterburner exhaust, and baghouse stack were analyzed for gas
molecular weight calculations. During each emission test series, samples of
the spent carbon feed, reactivated carbon product, and baghouse dust were
collected for dioxin/furan or precursor analysis. The furnace operating
conditions were documented during each run by recording key variables. The
measurements, locations and procedures used are discussed in detail below.
5.2 GASEOUS SAMPLING
Four types of gaseous samples were taken during this test program:
Modified Method 5 (MM5), HC1, EPA Method 3, and continuous emissions
monitoring (CEM). The sampling locations and methods are further discussed in
this section.
5.2.1 Gaseous Sampling Locations
5.2.1.1 Baghouse Outlet Exhaust Stack. The exhaust stack sampling
location for the carbon regeneration furnace baghouse is shown as Point A in
Figure 5-1. This location was used for dioxin/furan sampling and HC1 sampling
5-1
-------
TABLE 5-1. SOURCE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS MATRIX FOR SITE CRF-A
Location
Sample Location Description Identification Sample Type
Number of
Samples
Distribution
of Samples '
Analysis
d,e,f
Gaseous Samples
1. Baghouse Outlet Exhaust
Stack
2. Spray Cooler Inlet
(Afterburner Outlet)
3. Multiple-Hearth Furnace
Outlet (Afterburner Inlet)
4. Ambient Air Near Spray Cooler
Solid Samples
5. Baghouse Hopper
MM5 Dioxin
MM5 Field Recovery Blank
MMS Lab Train Blank
MM5 Solvent Blank
HC1 Train
HC1 Train Blank
EPA Methods 2,4
EPA Method 3
Continuous Monitoring
MM5 Dioxin
MM5 Field Recovery Blank
EPA Methods 2,4
EPA Method 3
EPA Method 3
Ambient XAD Train
One 500g composite of
hourly grab samples per
test
3 sets of 6
1 set of 6
1 set of 6
1 set of 3
3 sets of 3
1 set of 3
3 sets
3 sets of 2
3 sets
3 sets of 6
1 set of 6
3 sets
3 sets of 2
3 sets of 2
2 sets of 2
1 set of 3
3 sets to Troika
1 set to Troika
1 set to Troika
1 set to Troika
3 sets to Radian
1 set to Radian
Field analysis
3 sets to Troika
1 set to Troika
Field analysis
Field analysis
1 set to Troika
1 set to Radian
1 set to Troika
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin/furan
HC1
HC1 t
Gas Flow, H„0
N 0 CO/
C6, C6,, 0,, THC,
nox. s62. £
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin/furan
Gas Flow, H,0
n2. o2, CO/
n2. o2, co2
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin precursors
Dioxin/furan
6. Spent Carbon Feed to Furnace F
Two 500g composites of
hourly grab samples per
test.
2 sets of 3
1 set to Troika
1 set to Radian
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin precursors
One lOOg composite of
hourly grab samples per
test.
1 set of 3
1 set to Radian
Total chloride
7. Reactivated Carbon Product
One 500g composite of
hourly grab samples per
test.
1 set of 3
1 set to Troika
Diox in/furan
^Location identifications as shown in Figure 5-1.
cTroika refers to the ERL-Dululh, ECL-Bay St. Louis, and EMSL-Research Triangle Park EPA laboratories as a collective unit.
dRadian refers to Radian's laboratory in Research Triangle Park, N.C. ••
cDioxin means that 2,3,7,8-TCDD and tetra- through octa-dioxin homologue analyses were performed.
^Dioxin Precursors means that Cl-phenols, Cl-benzenes, PCB, and total chlorine analyses were performed.
Archive means that samples were stored for possible future dioxin and/or dioxin precursor analyses.
-------
Afterburner Exhaust
Natural Gas
Sodium Carbonate
Solution
Air
Atomising Air
Stack
Furnace
Exhaust
Spent Carbon
Natural Gas
Air
Baghouse
Exhaust
Baghouse
Catch
Regenerated
Carbon
ID
Fan
Spray
Cooler
After-
burner
Multiple
Hearth
Furnace
Baghouse
^ Spent Carbon
JL
Figure 5-1. Sample Point Diagram for Carbon Regeneration Furnace CKF-A.
-------
according to MM5 procedures described in Section 4.2.2, and also for
continuous monitoring of CO, and THC. EPA Methods 2, 3, and 4 were
performed to determine the volumetric flow rate, molecular weight of the
exhaust gas, and moisture content of the exhaust gas, respectively.
The sample port locations and dimensions are shown in Figure 5-2. The
inside diameter of the stack was 1.2 m (4.1 ft). Four, 3 inch diameter sample
ports with 3 inch long nipples were oriented 90' apart at a sample platform
located approximately 12.6 m (40 ft) above grade level. The sample ports were
approximately 9.5 m (7.6 duct diameters) downstream of the breaching where the
exhaust from the baghouse ID fan enters the stack, and 9.9 m (7.9 duct
diameters) upstream of the top of the stack. According to EPA Method 1, a
minimum of 20 traverse points were required. In this case, 24 traverse points
were used, and sampling was conducted for 10 minutes per traverse point for a
total of 240 minutes of on-line sampling. Two of the four ports were used fon
the traverse.
Samples for HC1 measurement were collected at a single point. The nozzle
was located at a point of approximately average velocity and the sample was
collected isokinetically over a period of 120 minutes.
Continuous monitoring was performed at this location using a port not in
service for the dioxin/furan or HC1 trains. Due to limited space at the
plant, the mobile laboratory housing the continuous monitoring instruments was
located approximately 38 m (125 ft) from the base of the exhaust stack. The
length of heat-traced sample line needed to access the mobile laboratory from
the stack was approximately 53 m (175 ft).
5.2.1.2 Spray Cooler Inlet (Afterburner Outlet). The spray cooler inlet
sampling location (i.e., afterburner outlet) is shown as Point B on
Figure 5.1.
This sampling location consisted of a single 3 inch diameter sample port
located near the downstream end of a long horizontal run of circular,
refractory-lined duct. The duct was considered by the host plant to be part
of the afterburner because of the elevated temperatures and the presence of
available oxygen (1 to 5 percent by volume). Dimensions of the sampling
location are shown in Figure 5-3. The outside diameter of the duct was 1.5 m
(5.0 ft) and the inside diameter was 1.1 m (3.7 ft). The 3 inch sample port
5-4
-------
Exhaust
Gas Flow
Four 3" diameter
Sample Ports
0.12m(4.6") thick
Refractory Lining
\
t
9.901(32.5')
1.5m(4.8')
9.5m(31.0')
Baghouse Exhaust Gas_
from 10 Fan
Grade Level
3.1m(10.0')
Figure 5-2. Baghouse Outlet Exhaust Stack Sampling Location.
5-5
-------
cn
i
cn
11.0m
(36.2')
1.3m.
(4.2*)
ID - 1.13m(3.7')
OD - 1.52m(5.0 )
f
0.2m(7.8') thick
Refractory Lining
MM5 Sample Port
(3" coupling)
Afterburner
Exhaust Gas
I
Exhaust Gas
to Spray Cooler
Figure 5-3. Spray Cooler Inlet (Afterburner Outlet) Sampling Location.
-------
is located on the side of the duct. The port was approximately 11.0 m (9.8
duct diameters) downstream of a 90° bend leading from the main afterburner
section and 1.3 m (1.1 duct diameters) upstream of a 90° bend leading to the
spray cooler. According to EPA Method 1, a minimum of 16 traverse points were
required for a two-dimensional particulate traverse. However, since only one
sample port was available the complete traverse was not possible. Twelve
traverse points located across the diameter of the duct were used, and
sampling was carried out for 20 minutes per point for an on-line sampling
period of 240 minutes. A water-cooled probe was required because of the high
temperature of the gas stream.
5.2.1.3 Multiple Hearth Furnace Outlet (Afterburner Inlet). The
multiple hearth furnace outlet (afterburner inlet) sampling location is shown
as Point C in Figure 5-1. This location was used only for integrated bag
sampling to develop information on excess air conditions at the furnace
exhaust. A single 2-inch diameter sample port is located in the exhaust gas
breeching leading from the multiple hearth furnace to the afterburner. The
sample port was accessible by standing on the grating above the furnace.
Integrated bag samples were taken from the sample port twice per test run and
analyzed for oxygen, CO, COgt and ^ using a gas chromatograph with a thermal
conductivity detector.
5.2.1.4 Ambient Air Sampling. The ambient atomizing air added to the
afterburner exhaust gas in the spray cooler was sampled for dioxin/furan and
dioxin precursors. The ambient atomizing air sampling location is shown as
Point D in Figure 5-1. The trains were positioned on a platform on the spray
cooler near the atomizing air intake point. The platform was approximately 30
feet above grade level.
5.2.2 Gas Sampling Procedures
Gas sampling procedures used during this program are discussed in detail
in the Tier 4 QAPP.* A summary of the gas sampling methods used at Site CRF-A
is given in Table 5-2, and a brief description of each method is provided in
the following sections.
5.2.2.1 Modified Method 5 (MM5). Gas sampling for dioxins was conducted
according to the October 1984 draft of the ASME chlorinated organic compound
sampling protocol with two exceptions. This sampling method is a modified
5-7
-------
Table 5-2. Summary of Gas Sampling Methods Used at Site CRF-A
Sample Location
Sample Type
or Parameter
Sample
Collection Method
Baghouse Outlet
Exhaust Stack
(Point A in Fig. 5-1)
Dioxin/furan
Volumetric flow
Modified EPA Method 5
EPA Method 2
Molecular weight
EPA Method 3
Moisture
EPA Method 4
HC1
HC1 Train
CO, CO?, 0-, NO ,
S02, and TflC x
monitoring
Continuous Monitors
Spray Cooler Inlet
(Afterburner Outlet,
Point 8 in Fig..5-1)
Dioxin/furan
Volumetric flow
Modified EPA Method 5
EPA Method 2
Molecular Weight
EPA Method 3
Moi sture
EPA Method 4
Multiple-Hearth Furnace
Outlet (Afterburner Inlet,
Point C in Fig. 5-1)
Molecular Weight
EPA Method 3
Ambient Air Sampling
(Near Atomizing Air Intake,
Point D in Fig. 5-1)
Dioxin/furan
Dioxin precursors
Ambient Air Train
Ambient Air Train
5-8
-------
version of EPA Method 5 that includes a solid sorbent module for trapping
vapor phase organicsr The only differences in the sampling protocol which
were not discussed in the Tier 4 QAPP are as follows:
1. Benzene was substituted for hexane or toluene as both the cleanup
and extractant solvent for both the MM5 filters and the XAD-2 resin.
This was caused by a discrepancy between the draft ASME sampling
protocol and the draft ASME analytical protocol. (November 15, 1985)
2. Methylene chloride was substituted for hexane as the final field
rinse solvent for the MM5 train. Methylene chloride was also
substituted for hexane in the glassware cleaning procedure. This
was caused by a high field train blank. (February 27, 1985)
The MM5 samples were collected isokinetically over a 4-hour sampling
period at the exhaust stack location in order to provide a sample volume
greater than the minimum of 3.4 dscm (120 dscf). At the spray cooler inlet,
the MM5 samples were collected isokinetically over a 4 hour sampling period to
provide a sample volume greater than the minimum of 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). The
MM5 sampling rates at both locations were between 0.014 to 0.021 scmm (0*5 and
0.75 scfm).
Following sample recovery, the various parts of the sample (filter,
Fm:iL"KTP<,.*{ rc.L.i'y-, ;t U
solvent rinses, sorbent trap, etc.) were sent to the EPA's^Tftnka laboratories
to quantify 2,3,7,8-TCDD, the tetra- through octa-PCDD homologues, and the
tetra- through octa-PCDF homologues present in the samples.
A schematic diagram of the MM5 sampling train is shown in Figure 5-4.
Flue gas was pulled from the stack through a nozzle and a glass-lined probe.
Particulate matter was removed from the gas stream by means of a glass fiber
filter housed in a Teflon-sealed glass filter holder maintained at 120°C+14°C
(248°F+25°F). The gas passed through a sorbent trap similar to that
illustrated in Figure 5-5 for removal of organic constituents. The trap
consisted of separate sections for 1) cooling the gas stream, and 2) adsorbing
p
the organic compounds on Amberlite XAD-2 resin (XAD). A chilled impinger
train following the sorbent trap was used to remove water from the flue gas,
and a dry gas meter is used to measure the sample gas flow.
5-9
-------
Thermocouple
"S" Type Pilot
Thermometer
^Check Valve
Stack Wal|J>r
I
O
Filter Holder
Thermocouple
yclone
Heated Zone
Silica Gel
— Ice Bath
/
water Knockout
By-Paee
ve
Orifice
Main Valve
Recirculation Pump Implnger
Thermometers
Vacuum Line
Dry Gee Alr-Tlght
Meter Pump
Figure 5-4. Modified Method 5 train.
-------
r
29/12
Coil
t2
\
28/12
XAO-2
Trap ""*¦*
•Tharmocoupla Wall
Coarta Frit
zs>
28/12
Figure 5-5. Adsorbent sampling system.
5-n
-------
5.2.2.2 HC1 Determination. HC1 concentration in the baghouse outlet
exhaust stack was determined using another modification of EPA Method 5. The
sample train components and operation were identical to those of EPA Method 5
with the following exceptions:
1. Water in the first two impingers was replaced with 0.1 NaOH.
2. Sampling was single point isokinetic with the nozzle placed at a
point in the stack with approximate average velocity.
3. The moisture/NaOH in the impingers was saved for laboratory analysis
by ion chromatography. The impinger catch was analyzed for total
chlorides by Radian.
4. The sampling period was 120 minutes for Runs 01 and 02, and 60
minutes for Run 03.
Recovery of the HC1 train provided a sample consisting of three components:
probe rinse, filter, and back-half rinse/impinger catch. These components
were shipped from the field to Radian's Austin, Texas laboratory where they
were analyzed for HC1.
5.2.2.3 Ambient Air Samp!inq. A schematic diagram of the "ambient XAD"
sample train is shown in Figure 5-6. The ambient train consisted of a short
glass probe, sorbent trap, knockout impinger (optional) silica gel impinger,
umbilical line, pump, and dry gas meter. Ambient air was drawn into the
sorbent module, where is was cooled to 20°C (68°F) or lower, and the organic
constituents were adsorbed by the XAD resin. The gas was then dried with the
silica gel and the sample volume measured by the dry gas meter.
Both ambient XAD sample trains were leak tested before and after each
test run at 2.5 kPa (10 inches 1^0) to ensure that the total leakage was less
than 0.02 cfm. The dry gas meter reading was recorded twice daily at the
beginning and end of each test period. The dry gas meter temperature, ice
bath temperatures, pressure, and volume were recorded once per hour during the
sampling periods. Although the sampling pump was only operated during MM5
sampling, the sorbent traps were cooled continuously (24 hours/day) to 20°C
(68°F) or lower.
5-12
-------
w\
1
OiAlt WOOi FlUO
V
r
"ICi mil JACKIT
'XAO MflN
•OlAJS HIT
V c
/£i\
&1
hk
THHMOMITM
OOOSINICK
KNOCKOUT IMPINOll
SIUCA Oik IMPINOII
¦ AC MKTKR KOX
tNCHNi MANOMITI*
n\
HT OAS MITIt
riNi
7m
COAtll
O
pump
o
Figure 5-6. Components of ambient air sampling train.
-------
Recovery of the ambient XAD sample trains was performed in a manner
similar to that of the MM5 train. The probes were rinsed with acetone and
methylene chloride three times each, and this rinse and the condensate (if
any) were stored in a single sample container. The sorbent trap was capped
with ground glass caps. The ambient air sample consists of the rinse and the
sorbent trap. The samples were shipped from the field to Troika for
dioxin/furan analysis and returned to Radian for dioxin precursor analysis.
5.2.2.4 Volumetric Gas Flow Rate Determination. The volumetric gas flow
rate was determined using EPA Method 2. Based on this method, the volumetric
gas flow rate is determined by measuring the average velocity of the flue gas
an the cross-sectional area of the duct. The average flue gas velocity is
calculated from the average gas velocity pressure ( P) across an S-type pitot
tube, the average flue gas temperature, the wet molecular weight, and the
absolute static pressure.
5.2.2.5 Flue Gas Moisture Determination. The moisture content of the
flue gas was determined using EPA Method 4. Bsaed on this method, a known
volume of particulate-free gas was pulled through a chilled impinger train.
The quantity of condensed water was determined gravimetrically and then
related to the volume of gas sample to determine the moisture content.
5.2.2.6 Flue Gas Molecular Weight Determination. The integrated
sampling technique described in EPA Method 3 was used to obtain a composite
flue gas sample for fixed gas (Og, CC^, Ng) analysis. The fixed gas analysis
was used to determine the molecular weight of the gas stream. A small
diaphragm pump and a stainless steel probe were used to extract single point
flue gas samples. The samples were collected at the sampling ports using
~
Tedlar bags. Moisture was removed from the gas sample by a water-cooled
condenser so that the fixed gas analysis would be on a dry basis.
The composition of the gas sample was determined using a Shimadzu Model
3Bt analyzer instead of the Fyrite or Orsat analyzer prescribed in Method 3.
The Shimadzu instrument employs a gas chromatograph and a thermal conductivity
detector to determine the fixed gas composition of the sample.
5.2.2.7 Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Continuous emissions
monitoring was performed in the exhaust stack for 0^, CO^, CO and THC
throughout the period that dioxin sampling was being conducted each test day.
5-14
-------
The purposes of the continuous monitoring effort were to observe fluctuations
in flue gas parameters, and provide an indication of combustion conditions.
0
Sample acquisition was accomplished using an in-stack filter probe and Teflon
sample line connected to a mobile laboratory. The heat-traced sample line was
maintained at a temperature of at least 120°C (250°F) to prevent condensation
in the sample line. The stack gas sample was drawn through the filter and
sample line using pumps located in the mobile laboratory. Sample gas analyzed
for CO, CO2, and Og was pumped through a sample gas conditioner which removes
moisture and thus provides a dry gas stream for analysis. A separate
unconditioned gas stream was supplied to the THC analyzer for analysis on a
wet basis.
An Anarad Model 412 nondispersive infrared analyzer was used to measure
CO and CO2; a Beckman model 755 paramagnetic analyzer was used to measure O2;
and a Beckman Model 402 flame ionization analyzer was used to measure THC.
5.3 SOLID SAMPLING
At Site CRF-A, solid samples were collected of spent carbon feed,
reactivated carbon, and baghouse dust. The sampling locations and methods are
discussed in the following sections.
5.3.1 Feed Sampling
Three composite samples of the spent carbon slurry were prepared from
individual hourly samples during each test day. The hourly samples were
collected from a tap valve prior to the one-hour surge tank that feeds the
furnace. Spent carbon slurry leaving the tap valve was screened with a 50
mesh shovel to remove excess water, and the screened sample was placed in a
container for compositing. At the end of the test day the composite was
thoroughly mixed, and three samples were prepared. A 500 g sample was sent to
Troika for dioxin/furan analysis, another 500 g sample was returned to
Radian/RTP for dioxin precursor analysis, and a 100 g sample was shipped to
Radian/Austin for total chloride analysis.
5-15
-------
5.3.2 Reactivated Carbon Product
During each test day a 500 g composite of reactivated product was
prepared from hourly grab samples. The grab sample was collected from a
sampling chute located between the bottom hearth of the furnace and the
product quench tank. The sample was collected hot into a 2 quart stainless
steel can and was covered and placed in a bucket of water to quench the
temperature of the sample. After cooling, the top half of the can contents
was discarded and the remainder was placed into a large stainless steel
bucket. At the end of-the test day the grab samples were mixed well and a
500 g daily sample was prepared.
5.3.3 Baqhouse Dust Sampling
During each test day, a 500 g composite sample of baghouse dust was
prepared from individual hourly samples. The hourly samples were collected
from the four dust storage boxes beneath the baghouse hoppers and composited
in a large container. At the end of the test day the composite was thoroughly
mixed, and a 500 g daily sample was prepared. These samples were shipped to
Troika for dioxin/furan analysis.
5-16
-------
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Laboratory procedures used to quantify dioxins/furans and dioxin/furan
precursors in the Tier 4 samples are described in this section. MM5 train
samples were analyzed by EPA's EMSL-RTP and ECl-Bay St. Louis laboratories for
dioxin/furan content. Procedures used for these analyses are described in
detail in the Analytical Procedures and QA Plan for the Analysis of Tetra-
through Octa-CDD's and CDF's in Samples from Tier 4 Combustion and
Incineration Processes (addendum to EPA/600/385-/019, April, 1985). These
procedures are summarized in Section 6.1.
Combustion device feed samples from Site CRF-A were analyzed by Radian to
determine concentrations of chlorinated phenols (CP), chlorobenzenes (CB),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), total organic halogen (TOX) and total
chlorine. Procedures used for these analyses are detailed in Section 6.2.
6.1 DIOXINS/FURANS
The analytical procedures summarized in this section were used by Troika
for dioxin/furan analysis of MM5 train samples from Site CRF-A. Samples
consisting of organic solvents, aqueous solutions, and solids were prepared
for analysis using slightly different procedures. The organic solvent samples
consisted of rinses from the MM5 probe, nozzle, filter housing and condenser
coil. Aqueous samples consisted of impinger catch solutions, and solid
samples included filters and XAD resin. Isotopically-1abeled surrogate
compounds were added to all samples prior to extraction to allow determination
of method efficiency and for quantification purposes.
Organic liquid samples (e.g., acetone and methylene chloride-based MM5
train rinses) were concentrated using a nitrogen blowdown apparatus. The
residue, which contained particulate matter from the MM5 train probe and
nozzle, was combined with the filter and handled as a solid sample. Solid
samples were extracted with benzene in a Soxhlet apparatus for a period of at
least 16 hours. The extract was concentrated by nitrogen blowdown and
subjected to chromatographic cleanup procedures.
Aqueous solutions (e.g., MM5 train impinger samples) were extracted with
hexane by vigorous shaking for a three hour period. This extraction procedure
6-1
-------
was repeated three times, with the organic fractions ultimately being combined
and concentrated for~chromatographic cleanup.
The cleanup procedure involved using liquid chromatographic columns to
separate the compounds of interest from other compounds present in the
samples. Four different types of columns were used: a combination acid and
base modified silica gel column, a basic alumina column, a PX-21 carbon/celite
545 column and a silica/diol micro column. These were used in successive
steps, with the last two being used only if necessary.
The cleaned samples were analyzed using high resolution gas
chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Conditions for the
analyses were as follows:
Gas Chromatoaraoh - Injector configured for capillary column, splitless
injection; injector temperature 280 C; helium carrier gas.
at 1.2 ml/min; initial column temperature 100 C: final
column temperature 240 C; interface temperature 270 C.
Mass Spectrometer - Varian/MAT Model 311A; electron energy 70ev; filament
emission 1mA; mass resolution 8000 to 10,000; ion source
temperature 270 C.
6.2 DIOXIN/FURAN PRECURSORS
Feed samples for Site CRF-A were analyzed by Radian/RTP for chlorophenols
(CP), chlorobenzenes (CB) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/MS; total
organic halides (TOX) by GC/Hall detector; total chlorine by Parr bomb
combustion followed by ion chromatography. Analytical procedures are
discussed in the following sections.
6.2.1 GC/MS Analyses
The analytical procedures used for determining CP, CB, and PCB
concentrations in feed samples are modified versions of procedures typically
used for the analysis of MM5 train components. These procedures involve
initial extraction of the sample with an appropriate solvent, preliminary
separation of the compounds of interest by solvent partitioning and liquid
chromatography, and analysis of the processed fractions. Solutions containing
CB and PCB are injected directly into the GC/MS, and solutions containing CP
6-2
-------
are derivatized prior to injection. Details on the procedures used for
Site 02 samples are provided in the sections below.
6.2.1.1 Sample Preparation A flow chart for the sample preparation
procedure used for Site CRF-A feed samples is shown in Figure 6-1. The first
step in the procedure involved adding labeled surrogate compounds to provide a
measure of extraction method efficiency. The next step involved adding a
mixture of 0.5 N NaOH and MeCl2 to the sample and sonicating the sample for 30
minutes. The NaOH and MeClj mixture converts the acid compounds to their
salts and collects base/neutrals in the organic solvent. The sonicated
sample was filtered and rinsed with 0.5 N NaOH. The filtrate was extracted
three times in a separatory funnel with MeCl^ and the aqueous and organic
fractions were saved for derivatization and/or further cleanup. The aqueous
fraction (or acids portion) was acidified to pH2 with HC1 and then extracted
three times with MeC^* The MeC^ from this extraction was dried with
anhydrous Na2S0^, exchanged to benzene, and concentrated using a nitrogen
blowdown apparatus. Acetylation of any CP present in the sample involved the
following steps:
1. 2.0 mL isooctane, 2.0 mL acetonitrile, 50 uL pyridine, and 20 uL
acetic anhydride were added to the extract. The test tube
containing the extract was placed in a 60 C water bath for 15
minutes and was shaken 30 seconds every 2 minutes.
2. 6 mL of 0.01 N H-P0. to the test tube, and the sample was agitated
for 2 minutes on a wrist action shaker.
3. The organic layer was removed and the quantitation standard was
added. The sample was concentrated in a Reacti-Vial at room
temperature (using prepurified N2) to 1 mL prior to GC/MS analysis.
Cleanup of the organic (or base/neutrals) layer from the first MeClj
extraction involved successively washing the extract with concentrated HjSO^
and deionized distilled water. The acid or water was added in a 30 mL portion
and the sample was shaken for two minutes. After the aqueous (or acid) and
organic layers were completely separated, the aqueous (or acid) layer was
discarded. The acid washing procedure was repeated until the acid layer was
colorless. The organic fraction from the final wash was dried with anhydrous
6-3
-------
Dlaeard Aquaou*
QC/US AnalyaJa
~-wat Column
20mL HtilMt
Filter with Na-SO,
EJuta with 90mL Hmiiiii;
Concentrate to ImU
Adiuat to pH2 with 1:1 H^04,
eitract' 3x with SOmL UaCU
Ada Quantitation Standards;
Concentrate to 1mC
Flitar thru Suchnar Funnal with
Qlaeawool Cake and Filter Pap ar
Mint-column with
1.0g Alumina
Add 10mL Hoxanea;
Coneantrata to ImL
Add 6mt. of 0.01 N
H.PO. i Shako 2 mlnutaa.
extract 3x with SOmL 0.9 N
MaOH In l.OL Separatory Funn
Cluta with SOmL 30/90
MeCI«/Hex*nee
Add 10mL Banxana
Coneantrata to ImL
Sonicate with 300mL
S0/50 MeCI^Hexanea (or 30 mln.
1.0ml. Baae/Neutral Surrogate*
i.OmL Acid Surrogate*
Put In 6
-------
^SO^, exchanged to hexane and concentrated. Final cleanup of the sample by
column chromatography involved the following procedure.
A glass macro-column, 20 mm o.d. x 230 mm in length, tapered to 6 mm o.d.
on one end was prepared. The column was packed with a plug of silanized glass
wool, followed successively by 1.0 g silica, 2.0 g silica containing 33% (w/w)
1 N NaOH, and 2.0 g silica. After wetting the chromatography column with
hexanes, the concentrated extract was quantitatively transferred to the column
and eluted with 90 ml hexanes. The entire eluate was collected and
concentrated to a volume of 1 ml in a centrifuge tube.
A disposable liquid chromatography mini-column was constructed by cutting
off a 5-mL Pyrex disposable pipette at the 2.0 mL mark and packing the lower
portion of the tube with a small plug of silanized glass wool, followed by 1 g
of Woehlm basic alumina. The alumina had been previously activated for at
least 16 hours at 600°C in a muffle furnace and cooled in a desiccator for 30"
minutes just before use. The concentrated eluate from above was
quantitatively transferred onto the liquid chromatography column. The
centrifuge tube was rinsed consecutively with two 0.3-mL portions of a 3
percent MeC^: hexanes solution, and the rinses were transferred to the liquid
chromatography column.
The liquid chromatography column was eluted with 20 mL of a 50 percent
(v/v) MeCl2:hexanes solution, and the eluate was concentrated to a volume of
approximately 1 mL by heating the tubes in a water bath while passing a stream
of prepurified over the solutions. The quantitation standard was added and
the final volume was adjusted to 1.0 mL prior to GC/MS analysis.
6.2.1.2 Analvsis Analyses for CP, CB and PCBs present in the feed
sample extracts were performed with a Finnigan Model 5100 mass spectrometer
using selected ion monitoring. A fused silica capillary column was used for
chromatographic separation of the compounds of interest. Analytical
conditions for the 6C/MS analysis are shown in Table 6-1.
Tuning of the GC/MS was performed daily as specified in the Tier 4 QA
Project Plan. An internal-standard calibration procedure was used for sample
quantitation. Compounds of interest were calibrated against a fixed
concentration of either d^-chrysene (for CB, PCB) or dg-naphthalene (for CP).
6-5
-------
TABLE 6-1.
ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS FOR THE GC/MS
Parameter
Chlorobenzenes/
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Chlorophenols
Column
30 m WB DB-5 (1.0 u film
thickness) fused silica
capillary
same
Injector Temperature
290°C
290°C
Separator Oven Temperature
290°C
290°C
Column Head Pressure
9 psi
9 psi
He flow rate
1 mL/min
1 mL/min
GC program
40(4)-290°C, 10°/
min & hold
40(1)-290°C,
12 /min & hold
Emission Current
0.50 mA
0.50 mA
Electron Energy
70 eV
70 eV
Injection Mode
Splitless 0.6 min,
then 10:1 split
Mode
Electron ionization,
Selected Ion Monitoring
6-6
-------
Components of the calibration solution are shown in Table 6-2. For
multi-point calibrations, this solution was injected at levels of 10, 50, 100,
and 150 ng/ml.
Compound identification was confirmed by comparison of chromatographic
retention times and mass spectra of unknowns with retention times and mass
spectra of reference compounds. Since the selected ion monitoring technique
was necessary for the samples analyzed, care was taken to monitor a
sufficiently wide mass region to avoid the potential for reporting false
positives.
The instrument detection limit for the analytes of interest (i.e., CP,
CB, and PCB) was estimated to be approximately 500 pg on column. For a 50 g
sample and 100 percent recovery of the analyte, this corresponds to a feed
sample detection limit of 10 ppb.
6.3 T0X ANALYSIS
Incinerator feed samples were analyzed for total organic halide (T0X) by
short-column GC and a Hall detector (GC/Hall). Solid samples were extracted
with benzene for at least 16 hours in a Soxhlet apparatus. The extracts were
washed three times with 100 mL portions of reagent-grade water concentrated to
10 mL.
An attempt to use a fused silica capillary column to separate surrogates
from target compounds was unsuccessful due to the complexity of the sample
constituents. Determinations for TOX were therefore performed on samples
without surrogates and no measure of extraction efficiency is available.
Instrument conditions are shown in Table 6-3. Sample quantitation was
based on an average response factor developed from a mixture of chlorinated
benzenes and brominated biphenyls. Individual CP, CB and PCBs were also
injected at various concentrations to develop a calibration curve for
comparison to the mixture response factors.
6-7
-------
TABLE 6-2. COMPONENTS OF THE CALIBRATION SOLUTION
Base/Neutrals
4-chlorobiphenyl
3,3'-dichlorobiphenyl
2,4',5-trichlorobiphenyl
3,3'4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl
2,2',6,6'-tetrachlorobiphenyl
2,2,4,5,6-pentachlorobiphenyl
2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl
2,2',3,4,4',5',6-heptachlorobiphenyl
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5'-octachlorobiphenyl
2,2',3,3',4,4',5,6,6'-nonachlorobiphenyl
decachlorobiphenyl
p-dichlorobenzene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,2,3,5-tetrachlorobenzene
pentachlorobenzene
hexachlorobenzene
d^-l,4-dichlorobenzene (SS)^
3-bromobiphenyl (SS)
2,2',5,5'-tetrabromobiphenyl (SS)
2,2',4,4',6,6'-hexabromobiphenyl (SS)
2
octachloronaphthalene (QS)
d^-phenanthrene (QS)
d^-chrysene (qs)
^Surrogate standard.
2
Quantitation standard.
Acids
2.5-dichlorophenol
2.3-dichlorophenol
2.6-dichlorophenol
3,5-dichlorophenol
3.4-dichlorophenol
2.3.5-trichlorophenol
2.3.6-trichlorophenol
3,4,5-trichlorophenol
2.4.5-trichlorophenol
2,3,4-trichlorophenol
2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol
pentachlorophenol
dg-phenol (SS)
d.-2-chlorophenol (SS)
Cg-pentachlorophenol (SS)
dg-naphthalene (QS)
2.4.6-tribromophenol (QS)
djg-phenanthrene (QS)
d^chrysene (QS)
6-8
-------
TABLE 6-3. ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS FOR TOX ANALYSIS
Hall Detector Conditions
Reactor temperature - 850°C
Solvent - n-propanol
Hydrogen flow rate - 35 mL/min
GC Conditions (Varian 3700)
Injection volume (1 - 5 uL)
Helium carrier gas flow rate - 60 mL/min
Column - 3-ft packed column with 1 in 10% OV 101
Column temperature - 200°C isothermal
6-9
-------
6.4 TOTAL CHLORINE ANALYSIS
Total chlorine concentrations in feed samples were determined by Parr
bomb combustion followed by ion chromatography (IC). A 0.5g sample was placed
in the Parr bomb with 10 mL of a 50 g/L Na2C03 solution. After combustion of
the samples according to standard procedures (ASTM 2015), the contents of the
bomb were rinsed into a 100 mL flask and diluted to 100 mL. The resulting
solution was analyzed for chloride concentration (CI") by IC using standard
anion conditions. For samples difficult to combust (such as sludges), 25
drops of paraffin oils were added to the bomb prior to combustion.
6-10
-------
7.0 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
This section summarizes results of quality assurance and quality
control (QC/QC) activities for field sampling at Site CRF-A. Manual gas
sampling methods are considered in Section 7.1, and continuous monitoring
and molecular weight determinations are considered in Section 7.2
7.1 MANUAL GAS SAMPLING
Manual gas sampling methods at Site CRF-A included Modified Method 5
(MM5), EPA Methods 1 through 4, and HC1 testing. These methods are
discussed in Section 6.0. Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)
activities for the manual sampling methods centered around (1) equipment
calibration, (2) glassware pre-cleaning, (3) procedural QC checks and
(4) sample custody procedures. Key activities and QC results in each of
these areas are discussed in this section. Also discussed are problems
encountered that may have affected data quality.
7.1.1 Equipment Calibration and Glassware Preparation
Pre-test calibrations or inspections were conducted on pitot tubes,
sampling nozzles, temperature sensors and analytical balances. Both
pre-test and post-test calibrations were performed on the dry gas
meters. The calibration data sheets for Site CRF-A are included in
Appendix D. All of the field test equipment met the calibration criteria
specified in the Tier 4 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). Differences
in the pre-test and post-test dry gas meter calibrations were less than
2.4 percent (%).
A pre-cleaning procedure was used for all sample train glassware and
sample containers. This cleaning procedure, which is outlined in
Table 7-1, was implemented to minimize the potential for sample
contamination with substances that could interfere with the dioxin/furan
analysis. To minimize the potential for contamination in the field, all
sample train glassware was capped with foil prior to use. A sample trailer
7-1
-------
-Table 7-1. GLASSWARE PRECLEANING PROCEDURE
NOTE: USE DISPOSABLE GLOVES AND ADEQUATE VENTILATION
R o
1. Soak all glassware in hot soapy water (Alconox ) 50 C or higher.
2. Distilled/deionized H^O rinse (X3).
o
3. Chromerge rinse if glass, otherwise skip to 4.
4. High purity liquid chromatography grade h^O rinse (X3).
5. Acetone rinse (X3), (pesticide grade).
6. Methylene chloride rinse (X3), (pesticide grade).
7. Cap glassware with clean glass plugs or methylene chloride rinsed
aluminum foils.
a(X3) = three times.
7-2
-------
was maintained for the specific purpose of sample train assembly and
recovery.
7.1.2 Procedural QC Activities/Manual Gas Sampling
Procedural QC activities during the manual gas sampling for
dioxin/furan and HC1 focused on:
visual equipment inspections,
utilization of sample train blanks,
ensuring the proper location and number of traverse
points,
conducting pre-test and post-test sample train leak
checks,
maintaining proper temperatures at the filter housing,
sorbent trap and impinger train,
maintaining isokinetic sampling rates, and
recording all data on preformatted field data sheets.
Unusual circumstances noted while carrying out the procedural QC
activities are discussed below.
There were two inherent problems with the inlet sampling location.
Number one was a build-up on the interior surface of the duct. This
build-up was visible and fairly uneven. The interior diameter was
estimated to be 43 inches. However, when sampling at the first two
points into the stack it was noted that the temperatures were much lower
than any of the other points. A theory, and only a theory, is that the
probe was in a pocket of the slag or at least being shielded from the
radiant heat. The second problem was the fact that there was only one
sampling port which was horizontal into the horizontal duct. This could
give a bias to the sample if there was stratification in the duct. It
was not possible to have another vertical port installed due to the high
temperature of the gas stream.
The outlet had one inherent problem. This was seen as a very low
pitot reading at point B4 and B5 as compared to the rest of-the sampling
points. This was very noticeable from the data sheets during test #1
7-3
-------
and #2. There may have been some obstruction under the pitot at these
points during the first two tests.
In light of the Tier 4 Dioxin Testing Program objectives, it is not
believed that the problems with the sampling locations will create any
significant deviation between the sampling results and true stack
concentrations of emissions.
A problem was encountered with one of the ambient sampling trains. It
was also the train from which the resin trap was sent to Troika. The
problem being that the bottom of the impinger broke during sampling on
the second day. It is impossible to pinpoint the time of the break or
the split in flow from the break and what may have been drawn through
the resin trap. It is possible to determine a conservative estimate of
the total cubic feet sampled by subtracting the cubic feet sampled
during the time period of the break from the total cubic feet sampled
during the test period. This procedure reduces the sampled volume from
12.66 dry standard cubic meters (DSCM) or 447.02 dry standard cubic feet
(OSCD.F) to 10.10 DSCM or 356.68 DSCF. If any dioxin is found by Troika
this method will impart a slightly high bias to the ambient air values.
At this time it is believed that this will not have more than a minor
effect on the test results.
Results of the average isokinetic calculations for all the test runs
are shown in Table 7-2. All the test runs fell within the required qual ity
assurance value of 100+10 percent.
Initial, final and port change leak checks for the MM5 and HC1 sample
trains achieved the QA objectives for all of the test runs. None of the
reported sample volumes required correction for sample train leakage. All
leak check data were noted on the MM5 field data sheets.
7.1.3 Sample Custody
Sample custody procedures used during this program emphasized careful
documentation of the samples collected and the use of chain-of-custody
records for samples transported to the laboratory for analysis. Steps
taken to identify and document samples collected included labeling each
sample with a unique alphanumeric code and logging the sample in a master
7-4
-------
Table 7-2. SUMMARY OF ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Run
Number
MM5 Outlet®
% Isokinetic
HC1 Outlet3
% Isokinetic
MM5 Inlet3
% Isokinetic
01
109.9
105.3
95.0
92
102.0
104.3
93.4
03
100.4
97.9
94.9
aThe quality assurance objective for MM5 and HC1 sampling was isokinetics
of 100+10 percent.
7-5
-------
logbook. All samples shipped to Troika or returned to Radian-RTP were also
logged on chain-of-custody records that were signed by the field sample
custodian upon shipment and also signed upon receipt at the laboratory.
Each sample container lid was individually sealed to ensure that samples
were not tampered with. No evidence of loss of sample integrity was
reported for samples collected at this site.
7.2 CONTINUOUS MONITORING/MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
Flue gas parameters measured continuously at the outlet location
during the MM5 test runs include CO, COg, O2, total hydrocarbons (THC).
The concentration of O2, CO2, and nitrogen (N2) was also determined for
integrated bag samples of the flue gas. Quality control results for these
analyses are discussed in this section.
Drift check results for the continuously monitored flue gas parameters
are summarized in Table 7-3. Data reduction was performed by assuming a
linear drift of the instrument response over the test day based on drift
checks at the beginning and end of the day. The largest calibration drifts
were observed for the COg analyzer, but did not exceed QC target goals for
any test run. The smallest instrument drift was observed in the O2 monitor.
The quality control standards for this program consisted of mid-range
concentration standards that were intended for QC purposes and not for
instrument calibration. The QC gases were analyzed immediately after
calibration each day to provide data on day-to-day instrument variability.
The acceptance criteria for the analysis of each QC standard was agreement
within +/-10 percent (%) of the running mean value. This criteria was met
for each of the monitored gases on each of the test days.
Molecular weight was determined by analyzing integrated bag samples of
flue gas for 0^> CO2, and N2. Quality control for this analysis involved
duplicate analyses of calibration gases immediately before and after sample
analysis. Analysis of the calibration gases was repeated until two consecu-
tive analyses within +/-5 percent were obtained. This same criteria of
+/-5 percent applied to duplicate analyses required for sample quantification.
These criteria were met for all molecular weight determinations.
7-6
-------
Table 7-3. SUMMARY OF DRIFT CHECK AW) COrfTROL STANDARO RESULTS
Drift Check PC Standard
Test Test Input Instrument Meets Input Output Difference From Meets
Date Run Parameter Concentration Drift. % QC? Concentration Concentration Running Mean, X CC?
5/29/85
5/30/85
5/31/85
01
02
03
°2
°2
°2
21.IX V
21.IX V
21.IX V
0.45
1.01
0.30
Yes
Yes
Yes
13.0% V
13.OX V
11.OX V
9.30
9.43
12.02
0.74
d
t
Yes
Yes
Yes
5/29/85
5/30/85
5/31/85
01
02
03
CO
CO
CO
5580 ppmv
5580 ppmv
5170 ppmv
2.68
4.49
-1.03
Yes
Yes
Yes
2006.0 ppmv
2006.0 pprnv
2500.0 ppmv
2166.0
2217.9
2910.0
1.15
d
Yes
Yes
Yes
5/29/85
5/30/85
5/31/85
01
02
03
C02
C02
C02
18.OS V
18.05 V
18.OX V
0.21
1.98
9.75
Yes
Yes
Yes
13.OX V
13.OR V
9.7X V
12.97
12.90
9.79
-0.23
d
Yes
Yes
Yes
5/29/85
5/30/85
5/31/85
01
02
03
THC
THC
THC
90 ppmv
90 ppmv
90 ppmv
1.67
5.00
1.68
Yes
Yes
Yes
19.7 ppmv
19.7 ppmv
19.7 ppmv
19.96
20.10
19.37
0.35
-2.22
Yes
Yes
Yes
"instrument drift Is defined as the percent difference between the Instrument drift response to the Input
concentration at the beginning and end of the test run.
^QC criteria was Instrument drift within +/- 10 percent.
cQC criteria was output concentration within +/- 10 percont of the running mean concentration for this test site.
Not available due to the fact that 0C gas had to be chaned for calibration because original tank ran out.
-------
7.3 LABORATORY ANALYSES
QA/QC activities were carried out for dioxin/furan, dioxin precursor,
and total chloride analyses performed on Site CRF-A samples. The
dioxin/furan analyses of MM5 train samples performed by Troika are
considered in Section 7.3.1; the dioxin precursor analyses of the spent
carbon feed samples performed by Radian/RTP are considered in
Section 7.3.2; and the total chloride analyses of HC1 train samples and
process samples are considered in Section 7.3.3.
7.3.1 Dioxin/Furan Analyses
Two individual topics related to the dioxin/furan analyses at
Site CRF-A are discussed in this section. Analytical recoveries of labeled
surrogate compounds spiked onto MM5 train samples are reported in Section
7.3.1.1. Sample blank data are reported in Section 7.3.1.2.
7.3.1.1 Surrogate Recoveries of the Test Samples. Table 7-4 presents
the analytical recovery data reported by Troika for four isotopically
labeled surrogate compounds spiked onto the samples requiring dioxin/furan
analysis. MM5 train samples were spiked with all four of the surrogates.
Average surrogate recoveries the MM5 train samples was 89 percent for the
spray cooler/baghouse inlet and 87 percent for the outlet. For the ambient
train samples, the average recovery was 87 percent and for the blank
samples the average recovery was 91 percent. These surrogate recovery
values were within the Tier 4 QA criteria of 40 to 120 percent for the
tetra-CDD surrogate and 40 to 120 percent for the hepta- and octa-CDD
surrogates.
The baghouse ash samples were spiked with two isotopically labeled
surrogate compounds. The average recovery of these compounds was 83
percent.
The spent carbon slurry samples were analyzed for dioxin/furan
precursors and spiked with six isotopically labelled compounds. The
analytical recovery efficiencies of these surrogate compounds are
summarized in Table 7-5. The average recovery for the base neutral
fractions was 60 percent and for the acids fractions was 16 percent.
7-8
-------
TABLE 7-4. PERCENT SURROGATE RECOVERIES FOR
SITE CRF-A DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSES
Sample
Type
37d
4
TCDD
13c
12
TCDD
37C1
4
Hepta-CDD
13C
12
Octa-CDt
MM5 Train Samples
Inlet
Run 01
70
96
114
84
Run 02
80
86
122
66
Run 03
92
94
102
64
Outlet
Run 01
84
90
80
82
Run 02
82
80
116
77
Run 03
68
94
90
105
Ambient Train
92
92
92
72
Proof Blank
82
80
116
79
Field Blank
(Inlet/Outlet)
84/88
92/102
138/64
94/72
Laboratory Blank
QC (MM5)
78
88
110
100
Laboratory Fortified
qC (MM5)
50
60
70
74
Baahouse Dust SamDles
Run 01
-
86
-
51
Run 02
-
94
-
73
Run 03
-
116
-
78
7-9
-------
TABLE 7-5. PERCENT SURROGATE RECOVERIES FOR SITE CRF-A FEED SAMPLES
Percent Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Soent Carbon Feed Samples
Compound Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average
Base Neutrals Fraction
d^-dichlorobenzene 14 24 27 22
bromobiphenyl 79 63 65 69
\romobi phenyl* 83 53 104 80
Acids Fraction
dg-phenol 16 15 16
16
d.-2-chlorophenol 36 25 30 32
* C -pentachlorophenol 3 ND ND 1
6
7-10
-------
The low surrogate recoveries for the acid fractions is believed to be
due to the extraction and clean-up procedure rather than the analytical
procedure. The base neutral fraction surrogate recovery values are within
the Tier 4 QA criteria of 40 to 120 percent.
7.3.1.2 Sample Blanks Table 7-6 summarizes the analytical results
reported by Troika for internal laboratory blanks and laboratory fortified
quality control (QC) samples. Comparison of the measured and spiked values
for the laboratory fortified QC samples showed agreement to within +25
percent for all target species except for 2378-TCDF. The measured value
for the 2378-TCDF was 125 percent higher than the spiked value.
The analytical results of the quality control field and laboratory MM5
train blanks are summarized in Table 7-7.
Octa-CDD, TCDF, and octa-CDF were detected in the inlet field blank
but at levels that were less than 5% of the inlet minimum test run value.
For the outlet field blank, all the homologues were detected except for
TCDD, penta-CDD, hexa-CDD, and hepta-CDF. The blank concentrations were
less than 50 percent of the outlet minimum test run value. Thus, field
recovery of the MM5 samples was considered adequate at Site MM5 samples was
considered adequate at Site CRF-A.
The laboratory proof blank contained measureable quantities of all
homologues except TCDD, penta-CDD and hexa-CDD. However, since the field
blank results are considered reasonable, the test run data reported in
Section 4 were not blank-corrected.
7.3.2 Total Chloride Analysis
Total chloride analyses were performed by Radian/Austin on the HC1
train samples. QA/QC activities included total chloride analysis of field
recovery blank HC1 train samples and total chloride analysis of an aliquot
of the KOH solution used in the sample train impingers. The NaOH blank,
the HC1 train probe rinse/filter blank, and the HC1 train impinger blank
rinses each contained less than 1 mg/L of chlorides. Therefore, the HC1
results did not require correction.
7-11
-------
TABLE 7-6. ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR TROIKA QUALITY
CONTROL SAMPLES FOR SITE CRF-A
Amount detected (Nanograms per sample)
Fortified Laboratory
Troika QC Sample .
Isomer/ Laboratory Measured True Difference
Homologue Blank Value Value
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
ND
(0.04)
0.4
0.4
0.
Other TCDD
ND
(0.07)
ND (0.1)
ND
0
Penta TCDD
ND
(0.02)
ND (0.1)
ND
0
Hexa TCDD
ND
(0.1)
1.8
1.6
12.5
Hepta TCDD
ND
(0.2)
2.0
CVJ
-16.7
Octa TCDD
0.2
3.0
3.2
-6.3
Furans
2378 TCDF
ND
(0.1)
0.9
0.4
125
Other TCDF
0.3
ND (0.01)
ND
0
Penta TCDF
ND
(0.2)
0.7
0.8
-12.5
Hexa TCDF
ND
(0.1)
1.7
1.6
6.3
Hepta TCDF
ND
(0.2)
1.7
2.4
-30
Octa TCDF
ND
(0.1)
3.0
3.2
-6.3
True values reperesent the amounts of each homologue spiked into the
.laboratory fortified QC samples.
% = (measured value - true value)/true value x 100
ND = not detected (detection limit indicated in parenthesis)
7-12
-------
TABLE 7-7. PROOF BLANK AND FIELD BLANK DIOXIN/FURAN
DATA FOR SITE CRF-A MM5 SAMPLES
Amount Detected. Nanograms per Train
Isomer/
Homologue
Laboratory
Proof Blank
Field
Blank Minimum Test
Run Value
Ratio
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Dioxins
2378-TCDD
--
--
0.2
--
--
Other TCDD
ND (0.1)
ND (0.2)
ND (0.1)
3.7
0.3
0
0
Penta TCDD
ND (0.4)
ND (0.1)
ND (0.04)
1.9
0.5
0
0
Hexa TCDD
ND (0.2)
ND (0.3)
ND (0.2)
11.7
0.9
0
0
Hepta TCDD
0.7
ND (0.2)
0.3
17.9
1.0
0
30
Octa TCDD
0.8
0.4
0.5
9.6
1.0
4
..50
Furans
2378 TCDF
--
3.5
--
--
Other TCDF
0.9
0.6
0.6
51.1
1.4
1
43
Penta TCDF
0.7
ND (0.3)
0.3
34.3
0.6
0
50
Hexa CDF
1.9
ND (0.2)
0.3
40.7
0.8
0
38
Hepta CDF
2.6
ND (0.1)
ND (0.7)
28.5
0.7
0
0
Octa CDF
1.1
0.2
0.2
13.1
0.5
1.5
40
Ratio of the field blank value to the minimum test run value expressed as a percentage.
ND = not detected.
7-13
-------
APPENDIX A
FIELD SAMPLING DATA
-------
APPENDIX A.1
Modified Method 5 and EPA Methods 1-4
Field Results
A-l
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST #
DATE :
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGHOOSE INLET
09-MM5-BI-1
5/29/85
1445-1505 1520-1900
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (min.) 240
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 29.3
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .368
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 151.49
Meter Pressure (in.H20) 1.27
Meter Temperature (F) 112.2
Stack dimension (aq.in.) 1452.205
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) -1.8
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 1098.1
Absolute stack preseure(in Hg) 29.16765
Average stack temperature (F) 1566.3
Percent C02 10.52
P e rc en t 02 7 .58
Percent N2 81.9
Delps Subroutine result 28.7482
DGM Fac tor 1 .0053
Pitot Constant .84
A-3
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD
OORCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S D L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOOSE INLET
: 0 9-MM5-B1-1
: 5/29/85
1445-1505 1520-1900
PARAMETER RESOLT
Vm(d sc £)
138.0555
Vm(d sc m)
3 .909732
Vv gas(sc f)
51 .77542
Vv gas (sen)
1 .46628
X moisture
27 .27449
Md
.7272551
HWd
29 .9864
MW
26.71717
Vb(fpm)
4437 .217
Vs (npm)
1352.81
F low( ac fin)
44748 .25
F 1 ov( ac mm)
1 267 .27
Flov(d sc fm)
8266 .71
Flow(d semm)
234.1 132
Z I
95 .06211
Z EA
53.98245
Program Revi6 ion:1/16/84
A-4
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGHOUSE INLET
09-MM5-BI-2
05/30/85
1440 -1 840
PARAMETER
VALUE
Sampling time (min.) 240
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 29.11
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .368
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 157.1
Meter Pressure (in.H20) 1.46
Meter Temperature (F) 111.02
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1452.205
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) -1.8
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 1120.2
Absolute stack pressure(in Bg) 28.97765
Average stack temperature (F) 1544.89
Percent C02 9.229999
V ere ent 02 6 .45
Percent N2 84.32
Delps Subroutine result 29.81478
DGM Fac tor 1 .0053
Pitot Constant .84
A-5
-------
RADIAN S
EPA H E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # _
DATE
TEST PERIOD
OORCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S U L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOUSE INLET
: 09-MM5-BI-2
: 05/30/85
: 1440-1 840
PARAMETER RESULT
Vbj( d sc f)
142.6047
Vm(dscm)
4 .036564
Vv gas(ecf)
52 .81743
Vv gas (sen)
1 .49579
Z moisture
27 .02736
Md
.7297265
MVd
29.7348
MW
26 .5632
Vs(fpm)
4630 .264
Vs (mpm)
1411 .666
F1ow( ac fm)
46695 .08
Flov( aeon)
1322 .405
F lov( d sc fm)
8691 .128
Flov(d semm)
246 .1327
Z 1
93 .39941
Z EA
40 .7 9573
Program Revision:1/16/84
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA HETHO
( R A V DATA
PLANT ;
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST #
DATE _ :
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGBOOSE INLET
09-MM5-BI-3
5/31/85
1010-1410
PARAMETER
VALUE
Sampling time (oin.) 240
Barometric Pressure (ia.Hg) 28.97
Sampling nozrle diameter (in.) .368
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 173.972
Meter Pressure (in.H20) 1.72
Meter Temperature (F) 103.29
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1452.205
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) -1.8
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 1265.4
Absolute stack pressure(in Hg) 28.83765
Average stack temperature (F) 1600.14
Pe rc en t C02 7 .83
Percent 02 9.939999
Percent N2 82.23001
Delps Subroutine result 33.80447
DGM Fac tor 1 .0053
Pitot Constant .84
A-7
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # _
DATE
TEST PERIOD
OORCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S 0 L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOUSE INLET
: 09-MM5-BI-3
: 5/31/85
: 1010-1410
PARAMETER RESULT
Vm(d sc f)
159.4247
Vm(d scm)
4.514908
Vv gas(sc f)
59 .66361
Vv gas (scm)
1 .689673
Z moisture
27 .23268
Md
.7276732
MWd
29 .6504
MW
26 .47769
Vs( fpm)
5271 .085
Va (mpm)
1607 .038
Flov( ac fm)
531 57 .61
Flow( acmm)
1505 .424
F lou(d sc fm)
9555 .144
Flov(d scmm)
270 .6017
Z I
94 .97405
Z EA
84 .46114
Program Revision:1/16/
A-8
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT :
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # :
DATE _ :
TEST PER~IOD :
ORCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
5AGH0USE EXHAUST
0 9-MM5-BO-1
5/29/85
1450-1650 1704-1904
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (nin.)
240
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg)
29.31
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.)
.308
MeCer Volume (cu.ft.)
150 .343
Meter Pressure (in.H20)
1 .24
Meter Temperature (F)
101 .96
Stack dimension (sq.in.)
1772.059
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20)
-.45
Stack Moiatore Collected (gm)
1632 .4
Absolute stack preBSure(in Hg)
29 .27691
Average stack temperature (F)
339.81
Percent C02
4.85
Percent 02
14.03
Percent N2
81 .12
DelpB Subroutine result
15.43609
DGM Factor
.9978
Pitot Constant
.84
A-9
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD
OURCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S U L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGBOUSE EXHAUST
: 0 9-MM5-BO-1
: 5/29/85
: 1450-1650 1704-1904
PARAMETER
Vm( d sc f)
Vm( d a cm)
Vv gas(sc f)
Vv gas (sen)
Z moisture
Md
MWd
MV
Vs(fpm)
Vs (mpm)
F lov( ac fm)
Flow(acmm)
F low( d sc fm)
Flov(dscmm)
Z I
Z EA
RES0LT
13 8.5027
3.922398
76 .96766
2 .17 9724
35 .72076
.6427925
29 .3372
25 .28747
2444 .376
745 .2366
30080 .41
851.8771
12490 .08
353 .71 91
109.9573
189.9622
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-10
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD :
ORCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
09-MM5-BO-2
5/30/85
1 440 -1 640 1650-1850
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (min.)
240
Barometric Pressure (in.Eg)
29 .06
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.)
.308
Meter Volume (cu.ft.)
145 .078
Meter Pressure^ (in.H20)
1 .1
Meter Temperature (F)
98.22
Stack dimension (sq.io.)
1772 .059
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20)
-.45
Stack Moisture Collected (gm)
1586
Absolute stack presaure(in Hg)
29 .02691
Average stack temperature (F)
344.38
Percent C02
4.91
Percent 02
13 .71
Percent N2
81 .38
Delps Subroutine result
16 .21706
DGM Factor
.9978
Pitot Constant
.84
A-l 1
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # „
DATE
TEST PERIOD
OORCB TEST
0 D S 2-5
S U L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
: 0 9-MM5-BO-2
5/30/85
1 440 -1 6 AO 1650-1 850
PARAMETER RESULT
Vm{ d sc f )
133 .3566
Vm(d sen)
3 .7 7666
Vv gas(ocf)
74 .77 99
Vv gas (sen)
2 .1 1 7767
Z moisture
35 .92 829
Md
.6407171
MUd
29.334
MW
25.26189
Vs(fpm)
25.80 .3 86
V s (mpm)
786 .703
F I ov( ac £m)
31754.14
F1ov(aeon)
899 .2771
Flov(d sc fm)
12956 .23
Flov( dsemm)
366 .9203
Z I
102 .0627
Z EA
1 76 .3498
Program Revision:1/ 1 6/84
A-12
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST # :
DATE _ :
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
09-MM5-BO-3
5/31/85
1002-1202 1213-1413
PARAMETER VALOE
Sampling time (min.) 240
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 28.97
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .308
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 166.962
Meter Pressure (iu.H20) 1.45
Meter Temperature (F) 97.79
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1772.059
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) -.45
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 1758.8
Absolute stack pressure(in Hg) 28.93691
Average stack temperature (F) 333.21
Percent C02 4 .23
Percent 02 14.61
Percent N2 81 .16001
Delps Subroutine result 18.48665
DGM Factor . 997 8
Pitot Constant .84
A-13
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T R
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # ..
DATE
TEST PERIOD
ODRCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S D L T S
SITE #09
BAGHODSE EXHAUST
0 9-MM5-B 0-3
5/31/85
1002-1202 1213-1413
PARAMETER
Vrn( d 8C f )
Vn(dsco)
Vv gas(sc f)
Vv gas (sen)
Z moisture
Md
MVd
MW
V8( fpm)
Vs (mpm)
F1ov( ac fm)
Flow( acmm)
Flow( d sc fm)
Flow(d scon)
X I
Z EA
RESULT
153 .2522
4.340101
82 .92742
2 .348505
35 .11202
.6488798
29.26121
25 .30717
2943 .447
897 .3 922
36221 .95
1025.806
15131 .17
428.5147
100 .4304
214.341
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-U
-------
APPENDIX A.2
Ambient Air Train Results
A-15
-------
RADIAN SOOKCE TEST
EPA METHOD 2-5
(RAW DATA)
PLANT :
SITE *9 CORRECTED TO DELETE THE VOLUME SAMPLED DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF THE
BROKEN IMPINGER (WORST POSSIBLE CASE)
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION : AMBIENT LOCATION
TEST # * : 09-AMB-IA
DATE : 5/29-30-31/85
TEST PERIOD :
29(1330-1915) 30(1135-1140 1430-1925) 31(1005-1345)
PARAMETER VALDE
Sampling time (min.) 1035
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 29.12
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .368
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 384.5
Meter Pressure (in.H20) .85
Meter Temperature (F) 92.1
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1452.205
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) .0001
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 74.25142
Absolute stack pressure(in Hg) 29.12001
Average stack temperature (F) 75.6
Percent C02 .0001
Percent 02 21
Percent N2 79
Delpa Subroutine result 33.80447
DGM Factor .9945
Pitot Constant .84
A-17
-------
RADIAN SOURCE TEST
EPA METHODS 2-5
FINAL RESULTS
PLANT :
SITE #9 CORRECTED TO DELETE THE VOLUME SAMPLED DURING THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF THE
BROKEN IMP INGER (WORST POSSIBLE CASE)
PLANT SHE
SAMPLING LOCATION : AMBIENT LOCATION
TEST # : 0 9-AMB-lA
DATE : 5/29-30-31/85
TEST PERIOD
29(1330-1915) 30(1135-1140 1430-1925) 31(1005-1345)
PARAMETER RESULT
Vm(dsc f)
356 .6796
Vm(dsca)
10 .10117
Vv gas(bcf)
3 .500955
Vw gas (sen)
9 . 914703 E
Z moisture
.9719999
Md
.99028
MVd
28.84004
MW
28.73468
Vb(fpm)
5035 .249
Va (npm)
1 535 .1 37
F low( ac fin)
50779.26
Flotf(acmm)
1438.069
F lov( d 8c fin)
48246 .71
F1ow(dscam)
1366 .347
Z I
9.758161
Z EA
-14583 .23
Program Revis ion:1/16/ 84
A-18
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
(RAW DAT
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PBRIOD
OURCE TEST
0 D 2-5
A )
SITE #09
AMBIENT LOCATION
0 9-AMB-lB
5/29-30-31/85
29(1330-1915) 30(1134-1140 1430-1925) 31(1005-1345)
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (min.)
1036
Barometric Pressure (in.
Hg)
29.12
Sampling nozzle diameter
( in .)
.368
Meter Volume (cu.ft.)
429.216
Meter Pressure (in.H20)
.83
Meter Temperature (F)
89.7
Stack dimension (sq«in.)
1452 .205
Stack Static Pressure (in«B20)
.0001
Stack Moisture Collected
(go)
83 .9
Absolute stack pressure(
in Bg)
29 .12001
Average stack temperature (F)
75.4
Percent C02
.0001
Percent 02
21
Percent N2
79
Delps Subroutine result
33 .80447
DGM Factor
1 .0013
Pitot Constant
.84
A-19
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD
ODRCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S D L T S
SITE #09
AMBIENT LOCATION
0 9-AMB-lB
5/29-30-31/65
29(1330-1915) 30(1134-1140 1430-1925) 31(1005-1345)
PARAMETER RESULT
7b(dsc f)
402 .6125
Vm(d sen)
11 .40199
Vv gas(8cf)
3 .955885
7v gas (sen)
.1120307
Z moisture
.9729938
Md
.9902701
MVd
28.84004
MW
28.73457
Vs(fpm)
5035 .26
Vs (mpm)
1535 .14
F lov( ac fm)
5077 9.37
Flov(ac mm)
1438.072
F 1 ov( dscfm)
48264.35
F1ov(d semm)
1366 .846
Z I
11 .00016
Z EA
-14583 .23
Program Revision: 1 / 1 6 / 84
A-20
-------
APPENDIX A.3
CEM Results
A-21
-------
TABLE A-l. RADIAN CEM DATA, RUN 1
A-23
-------
TABLE A-l. RADIAN CEM DATA, RUN 1
(cont'd.)
- - ii'E C-' - TEST 1
- # - r< ~
+ * I "*70
17.3
77. 4
4. 2
"7
r. ~ iz'~
I "77
17. C
n —
*¦ 7 . "I Z r
L 770
7, 7
7. *7
' ^ ^
++ 1777
17. -
- _ -
0.-3
-.4 "CI
1~4£
I "7 ""
70.3
4. :
#
2 . -*• 7 i 2
~~ t 74*3
i7.7
•i •• . 7
4 . 1
4 . 1
1.
1753
~. 5
c 7. 7
4. :
7. 7
2. 6
1777
L 7. -r
~ z.
4 . ;
7 .
• "" . — T. ~
+* 1900
17.™
4. L
- ^ ~
* —. . — 71
-¦* ISQ7
1 . Z
j . 2
7. -a
7.771 1
~~ 1910
"¦. T
- 2
4. 7
7. 4
_ - — _ c
** 13 17
17.4
c ~
J - . w
4 . "
7. 4
~ ~.7772
IS2'2
~ . -
4 7.7
7. 7
2. _
*
: = 25
I . . _
= 5.0
4.7
2. 5
* * 13 7 J
17.1
47. 7
4 . 7
2.4
7.7260
+ ~ 1 S 77
1 7 . ~
^ c c
J . -
7. 7
7.1 =>0
~* 1340
17. 1
^ ^ r»
4 . 5
2. 7
. - ~ t i
+-~ I £4*3
17.1
13. 7
4 . o
2. 7
7.7147-
*¦* 1570
17."
4 - . ~
4 . ..
2. 2
~ 7.7771
:£77
17.7
47-. a
4 . Z
l.S
j _ 7^to
l'=CO
17. 1
7:. o
4. ¦-
• ¦ 3
-o
MO. F-72.
"7
c. ®!
"0
73
f 2 . -l ; 1 7"
flEvM
17. -
1 7 . 1
4 . i 3
j.. ~
" 7. 7*7 ¦ . 7. i
std. :ev.
m ~
-»c : r
0. 7
2
~ CD, r 7
Z
-------
TABLE
A-2. RADIAN CEM DATA, RUN 2
A-25
-------
TABLE A-3. RADIAN CEM DATA, RUN 3
A-26
-------
APPENDIX A.4
HCl Train Results
A-27
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
(RAW DATA
PLANT :
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST # :
DATE
TEST PERIOD
ORCE TEST
D 2-5
)
SITE #09
BAGHOOSE EXHAUST
0 9-HCL-BO-l
5/29/85
1453-1653
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (min.)
120
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg)
29.31
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.)
.308
Meter Volume (cu.ft.)
75.774
Meter Pressure (in.H20)
1 .3
Meter Temperature (F)
106 .4
Stack dimension (sq.in.)
1772 .059
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20)
-.45
Stack Moisture Collected (go)
789 .1
Absolute stack pressure(in Hg)
29.27691
Average stack temperature (F)
3 40 .8
Percent C02
4.85
Percent 02
14.03
Percent N2
81 .12
Delps Subroutine result
16 .02473
DGM Factor
1 .0029
Pitot Constant
.84
A-29
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # _
DATE
TEST PERIOD
ODRCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S D L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOOSE EXHAUST
: 0 9-HCL-BO-l
: 5/29/85
: 1453-1653
PARAMETER
Vm(d sc f )
Vm(d sc m)
Vv gas(scf)
Vv gas (sen)
Z moisture
Md
MWd
MU
Vs(fpm)
Vs (mpm)
F lov( ac fm)
Flow(acmm)
F lov( d sc fm)
Flow(d acmm)
Z I
Z EA
RESULT
69 .62365
1 .971742
37 .20606
1 .053676
34.82745
.6517255
29.3372
25 .38874
2532 .523
772 .1106
31165.14
882 .5966
13104.1
371 .1082
105 .3684
1 89 .9622
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-30
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
PARTICULATE
PLANT :
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # _ :
DATE :
TEST PERIOD
0 R C E TEST
D 5
LOADING
SITE #09
BAGHOOSE EXHAUST
09-HCL-BO-I
5/29/85
1453-1653
PARAMETER
Total Grams
Grams/dsc £
Grams/ac £
Gra iae/dsc £
Grains/ac f
Gratns/d sen
Grans/acm
Pound s/d scf
Pounds/ac f
Pounds/Hr
K ilog rams/Hr
FRONT-HALF
0 .0011600
0 .0000167
0 .0000070
0 .0002571
0 .0001061
0 .0005883
0 .0002474
0 .0000000
0 .0000000
0 .0288847
0.0131020
TRAIN TOTAL
0 .0009100
0 .0000131
0 .0000055
0 .0002017
0.0000848
0 .000461 5
0.0001941
0.0000000
0.0000000
0.0226596
0 .0102783
Program Reviaion:1/16/C4
A-31
-------
RADIAN
EPA MET
(RAW DA
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD
SOURCE TEST
HOD 2-5
T A )
SITE #09
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
0 9-HCL-B 0-2
5/30/85
1443-1643
PARAMETER
VALUE
Sampling time (min.) 120
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 29.06
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .308
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 78.70201
Meter Pressure (in.H20) 1.44
Meter Temperature (F) 97.96
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1772.059
Stack Static Fresaure (in.B20) -.45
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 846.3
Absolute stack pressure(in Hg) 29.02691
Average stack temperature (F) 346.42
Perc ent C02 4.91
Perc en t 02 13.71
Pere en t N2 81.3 8
Delps Subroutine result 17.24966
DGM Fac tor 1 .0029
Pitot Constant .84
A-32
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST # _
DATE
TEST PSRIOD
OUBCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S C L T S
: SITE #0 9
: BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
: 09-HCL-BO-2
: 5/30/85
: 1443-1643
PARAMETER
Vm(d ac f)
Vm(dacrn)
Vw gas(scf)
Vv gas (sen)
Z moisture
Md
MVd
MV
Vs(fpm}
Va (mpm)
Flov
-------
RADIAN SO
EPA METHO
PARTICULATE
PLANT :
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST # „ :
DATE :
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 5
LOADING
SITE #09
BAGBOUSE EXHAUST
0 9-HCL-B0-2
5/30/85
1443-1643
PARAMETER FRONT-HALF TRAIN TOTAL
Total Grams
0.0021500
0 .0013700
Grams/dsc f
0.0000295
0.0000188
Grams/ac f
0.0000121
0 .0000077
Grains/dscf
0.0004556
0.0002903
Grains/ac £
0.0001870
0.0001191
Grams/dscm
0.0010427
0.0006644
Grams/acm
0.0004278
0 .0002726
Pound s/d sc £
0.0000001
0.0000000
P ound s/ac f
0.0000000
0 .0000000
Pound s/Hr
0.0540798
0 .0344602
R i1og rams/Hr
0 .0245304
0.0156310
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-34
-------
RADIAN SOURCE TEST
EPA METHOD 2-5
(RAW DATA)
PLANT : SITE #09
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION : BAGHODSE EXHAUST
TEST # : 0 9-HCL-B 0-3
DATE _ : 5/31/85
TEST PERIOD : 1105-1205
PARAMETER VALUE
Sampling time (min.) 60
Barometric Pressure (in.Hg) 28.97
Sampling nozzle diameter (in.) .308
Meter Volume (cu.ft.) 43.373
Meter Pressure (in.H20) 1.87
Meter Temperature (F) 94.08
Stack dimension (sq.in.) 1772.059
Stack Static Pressure (in.H20) -.45
Stack Moisture Collected (gm) 454.1
Absolute stack presaure(ia Hg) 28.93691
Average stack temperature (F) 331.33
Percent C02 4.23
Percent 02 14.61
Percent N2 81 .16001
Delps Subroutine result 19.756
DGM Fac tor 1 .0007
Pitot Constant .84
A-35
-------
RADIAN S
EPA M E T H
FINAL RE
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST 4 _
DATE
TEST PERIOD
ODRCE TEST
0 D S 2-5
S D L T S
: SITE #09
: BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
r 0 9-HCL-BO-3
: 5/31/85
: 1105-1205
PARAMETER RESULT
Vm(d sc f)
40 .23723
Vm(d sen)
1 .13951 8
Vv gas(scf)
21 .41082
Vv gas (acn)
.6063543
Z moisture
34.73073
Md
.6526928
MVd
29.26121
MV
25 .35011
V8( fpm)
3142 .888
Vs (mpm)
958.1976
F lov( ac fm)
38676 .27
F lov(acmm)
1095.312
F low( d sc fm)
16289.97
Flow(d semm)
461 .3319
Z I
97 .9713
Z EA
214.341
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-36
-------
RADIAN SO
* E P A METHO
PARTICULATE
PLANT
PLANT SITE :
SAMPLING LOCATION :
TEST # _ :
DATE :
TEST PERIOD :
DRCE TEST
D 5
LOADING
SITE #09
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
0 9-HCL-B0-3
5/31/85
1105-1205
PARAMETER
ToCal Grains
Grams/dsc f
Grams/ac £
Grains/dscf
Grains/acf
Grams/d scm
Grams/acm
Pound s/d sc f
Pound 8/ac f
Pound s/Br
R ilog rams/Hr
FRONT-HALF
0 .0010000
0.0000249
0 .0000105
0 .0003835
0 .0001615
0 .0008775
0 .0003696
0 .0000001
0 .0000000
0 .0535614
0 .0242953
TRAIN TOTAL
0 .0013000
0 .0000323
0 .0000136
0 .0004985
0 .0002100
0 .0011408
0 .0004805
0 .0000001
0 .0000000
0 .0696298
0 .0315839
Program Revision:1/16 / 84
A-37
-------
APPENDIX A.5
Modified Method 5 and EPA Methods 1-4
Sample Calculations
A-39
-------
R
A
DIAN SOURCE TEST
E
P
A METHODS 2-5
D
E
FIN1TI0N OF TERMS
PARAMETER
DEFINITION
Tt(min.)
JOTAL SAMPLING TIME
Dn(in.)
SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER
PsC in.H2 0)
ABSOLUTE STACK STATIC GAS PRESSURE
Vm(cu . f t.)
ABSOLUTE VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLE MEASURED BY DGM
Vv(gm.)
TOTAL STACK MOISTURE COLLECTED
Po(in.H20)
AVERAGE STATIC PRESSURE OF DGM
Tm( F)
AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF DGM
Pb ( in.Hg .)
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
Z C02
CARBON DIOXIDE CONTENT OF STACK GAS
Z 02
0X7GEN CONTENT OF STACK GAS
Z N2
NITROGEN CONTENT OF STACK GAS
SQR(DELPS)
AVE. SQ. ROOT OF S-PITOT DIFF. PRESSURE-TEMP. PRODUCTS
Ae ( sq.in .)
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF STACK(DUCT)
Ta(F)
TEMPERATURE OF STACK
Vm(dscf)
STANDARD VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED ,Vm(atd ) , AS DRY STD
. CF
Vm(d scm)
STANDARD VOLUME OF GAS SAMPLED,Vm(8td),AS DRY STD.
CM
Vv gas(8C f)
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR IN GAS SAMPLE,STD
Z moisture
WATER VAPOR COMPOSITION OF STACK GAS
Md
PROPORTION, BY VOLUME,OF DRY GAS IN GAS SAMPLE
MWd
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS.DRY BASIS LB/LB-MOLE
MV
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, WET BASIC LB/LB-MOLE
Vs( fpm)
AVERAGE STACK GAS VELOCITY
Flov(ac fin)
AVERAGE. STACK GAS FLOW RATE(ACTUAL STACK COND.)
Flov( acmm)
AVERAGE STACK GAS FLOW RATE(ACTUAL STACK COND.)
Flov( dscfm)
AVERAGE STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE(DRY BASIS)
Flov(dscmm)
AVERAGE STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE(DRY BASIS)
Z I
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
% EA
PERCENT EXCESS AIR IN STACK GAS
DGM
DRY GAS METER
Y
DRY GAS METER CORRECTION FACTOR
*g
STACK STATIC GAS PRESSURE
Cp
PITOT COEFFICIENT
dH
ORIFICE PLATE DIFF. PRESS. VALUE
dP
PITOT DIFF. PRESS. VALUE
*** EPA
STANDARD
Temperature = 68 deg-F (528 deg-R)
CONDITIONS
Pressure ¦ 29.92 in. Hg.
A-41
-------
RADIAN SOURCE TEST
EPA METHOD 2-5
SAMPLE CALCULATION
PLANT
PLANT SITE
SAMPLING LOCATION
TEST #
DATE
TEST PERIOD
SITE #09
5AGB0USE EXHAUST
0 9-MM5-B0-1
5/29/85
1450-1650 1704-1 904
I) Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg-F ,29.92 in. Hg)
Y x Vm x [T(std) + 460] x [Pb +(Pm/13.6)]
Vm(8 td)
P(std) x (Tin + 460)
.9978 x 150 .343 x 528 x [ 29.31 «¦ ( 1.24 /13 .6) ]
Vm(std) ¦ — —
29.92 x ( 101 .96 + 460)
Vm(atd) ¦ 138.503dscf
2) Volume of water vapor at standard conditions:
Vw(gas) * 0 .04715 cf/gm x W( 1) gm
Vw(gas) ¦ 0.04715 x 1632.4 - 76.968 scf
3) Percent Moisture in stack gas :
100 x Vv(gas)
ZK =
Ve(std) + Vv(gas)
100 x 76.968
ZM 3 5 .72 Z
138.503 + 76 .968
4) Mole fraction of dry stack gas :
100 - ZM 100 - 35.72
Md - .6427925
100 100
A-42
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATION
PAGE TWO
i)Average Molecular Weight of DRY stack gas :
MVd - (.44 x ZC02) ~ (.32 x *02) + (.28 x X N2)
MWd - (.44 x 4.85 ) ~ (.32 x 14 .03 ) ~ (.28 x 81 .1 2 ) - 29 .337 2
6)Average Molecular Weight of vet stack gas
MW «= KVd x Md +18(1 - Md)
MW - 29 .3372 x .6427925 + 1 8( 1 - .6427925 ) - 25 .28747
/) Stack gas velocity in feet-per-minute (fpm) at stack conditions
7s - KpxCp x [SQRT (dP)]{ave} x SQRT iTs {avg}] x SQRT ll/(PsxMW)] x 60sec/
Vs - 85 .49 x .84 x 60 x 15 .43609 x SQRTll/( 29 .27691 X 25 .28747 )]
V8 - 2444.376 FPM
8) Average stack gas dry volumetric flov rate (DSCFM) :
Vs x As x Md x T(std) x Ps
Qsd ¦
144 cu . in./cu.ft• x (Ts +460) x P(std)
2444.376 x 1772.059 x .6427925 x528x 29.27691
Qsd ¦
144 x 799.81 x 29.92
Qsd ¦ 12490 .08 dscfm
A-43
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATION
PAGE THREE
9)Isokinetic sampling raCe (Z) :
Dimensional Constant C • K4 i 60 i 144 z [1 / (Pi /4)]
K4 - .0945 FOR ENGLISH UNITS
C x Vm(std) x (T8 + 460)
12 -
V8 x Tt x Pa x Md x (Dn)~2
103 9 .574 x 138.5027 x 7 99 .81
12
2444 .376 x 240 x 29 .27691 x .6427925 x( .308 ) *2
II - 109.9573
10) Excess air (Z) :
100 x Z 02 100 x 14 .03
EA ¦ »
(.264 x ZN2) - Z02 (.264 x 81 .12 ) - 14.03
EA - 189.96
11) Particulate Concentration :
C8 ¦ ( grams part.) / Vm(std) ¦ 0 / 13 8 .5027
C s ¦ 0 .0000000 Grams/DSCF
T(std) x Md x Ps x Cs
C a »
P(std) x Ts
528 x .6427925 x 29.27691 x 0.0000000
Ca »
29.92 x 799.81
Ca ¦ 0.0000000 Grams/ACF
LBS/HR ¦ Cs x 0.002205 x Qsd x 60
LBS/HR - 0 .0000000X 0 .002205 x 12490 .1 x 60
LBS/HR - 0
Program Revision:1/16/84
A-44
-------
APPENDIX A.6
EPA Method 3 Data
A-45
-------
TABLE A-6. FIXED GAS ANALYSIS
CM
O
o
°2
n2
Run Number
(vol %)
(vol %)
(vol %)
Furnace Outlet
Run 1
10.52
7.58
81.89
Run 2
9.23
6.45
84.31
Run 3
7.83
9.94
82.35
Baqhouse Outlet
Run 1
4.85
14.03
81.41
Run 2
4.91
13.71
80.74
Run 3
4.23
14.61
81.12
SDrav Cooler Inlet
Run 1
9.29
7.51
83.18
Run 2
7.62
8.40
83.97
Run 3
7.89
8.85
83.24
A-47
-------
APPENDIX B
Process Monitoring Data
-------
Table B.l. Hearth Temperature History During Test Period*
Deviation From Run and Hearth Specific Mean (%)
Hearth Nos. Flue
Run No.
Time
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Gas
1
1400
6.1
-0.4
0.8
9.9
1.1
6.0
0
2.7
5/29/85
1500
3.8
-1.6
0
6.3
0.5
6.0
-1.2
0.2
1600
2.6
-2.8
-0.6
4.5
0
4.9
-6.1
0.2
1700
2.6
-1.6
0
5.4
0
4.9
-6.6
0.2
1800
1.4
-2.8
-0.6
6.3
-0.5
3.7
-4.4
-1.0
1900
16.8
5.6
0.8
16.2
0.5
6.0
1.6
10.0
2000
17.9
8.0
LI
ILi
0.5
6.0
1.6
10.0
Average
7.3
0.7
0.4
9.4
0.3
5.4
-2.2
3.2
2
1400
5.0
6.8
2.2
0
-2.7
-2.5
0
16.1
5/30/85
1500
4.4
7.4
2.5
3.6
-1.4
-1.9
1.6
5.1 .
1600
3.8
6.2
0
5.4
-0.5
-0.2
1.3
3.9 '
1700
2.6
5.6
0
4.5
-0.5
-0.2
1.0
3.9
1800
1.4
4.4
-0.6
3.6
-0.5
0
1.0
2.7
1900
0
4.4
-0.3
3.6
0.3
0.3
0
-2.2
2000
-3.3
0.8
-1.0
-0.9
0
-0.2
0.8
-2.2
Average
2.1
5.1-
•0.7
2.8
-0.8
-0.7
0.8
4.4
3
900
-8.0
-4.6
-0.6
-8.1
1.9
-3.9
3.5
-6.5
5/31/85
1000
-8.6
-5.2
-1.0
-11.3
1.4
-4.5
3.0
-6.5
1100
-12.1
-8.2
-2.7
-15.8
0.5
-4.8
0.2
-10.2
1200
-12.7
-8.2
-1.0
-17.1
0
-6.8
1.0
-10.2
1300
-12.7
-8.2
-1.0
-17.1
0
-6.8
1.0
-10.2
1400
-U.6
-7.0
-0.6
-16.?
-0.3
-6.8
0.8
-8.9
Average
-11.0
-7.0
-1.2
-14.2
0.5
-5.6
1.6
i
00
*The host plant considers the hearth temperature data confidential.
8-1
-------
FURNACE AFTERBURNER
HE ET
7 trw
OPERATOR 3
OPERATOR11
OPERATOR 7
AFTERBURNER
DRAFT
CONTROLLER
BURNER A
GAS/OIL
OR OFF
BURNER B
GAS/OIL
OR OFF
AFTERBURNER
COOLING
CONTROLLER
•A"fURNACE
DRAFT
CONTROLLER
(O
FAN
AMPS
AFTERBURNER
HEATING
CONTROLLER
AFTERBURNER
DRAFT
OXYGEN
OXYGEN
CONTROLLER
A"FURNACE
ORAFT
TEMPERATURE
CONTENT
OESIREO
CONDITION
J,7*4
7 AM
B AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
I] NOON
] PM
4 PM
G PM
J PM
0 PM
g pm
czf-.r.-.
IIVi.'_
r 2v.i
!7A
to PM
11 PM
17 MID
I AM
1 AM
3 AM
4 AM
Record any unusutl occurrence! on youi «hifi, tic. Turn into Fortportoo it end oMI -7 shift.
ALL AFTERBURNER OUTAGES AND THEIR CAUSE MUST BE RECORDED.
REMARKS
COMMENTS
OPERATOR 7
OPERATOR 3-11
OPERATOR 11 • ?
-------
PARTICULATE ABATEMENT
LOG SHEET
OPERATOR ?
OPERATOR 11 7
BAGHOUSE
OUTLET
TfcMJ>EAATURE
HjO VALVE
HjO VALVE
HOPEN
E.C. INLET
TEMPERATURE
E C. OUTLET
TEMPERATURE
0AGHOU5E
HjO FLOW
GPM
AFTERBURNER
DRAFT
I D, FAN
DRAFT
% OPEN
DESIRED
CONDITION
7 AM
6 AM
7QU~
—£7/4
3S&
O AM
II AM
iYnoon
4 PM
6 PM
a pm
1 PM
LlQO
3±t£l
L-lOO
II Pm
12 MfO.
« AM
V- &
& AM
REMARKS: Racoid any unusual occuirancei on your tftift. Ate. Turn into Forepauon at and of 11 • 7 thilt.
COMMENTS
£tLT6& C#/<£~
/SV*-
-
- 7^.
//^A
OPERATOR 7 • S y
/ - sa3o
jZ -
3 - /£>•/&•
OPERATOR 1 11
a/i
ISAM "^oa-nwje: AOoOO dkug LW<£cft.S-
OPEHATOH
l«£
-------
tan %om
1*24fry if.
SERVICE BUILDING LOG SHEET
n*f
OPERATOR
»•" fl-IJ.
7
-------
Figure B-4. Stripchart of afterburner temperature, spray cooler
outlet temperature, and baghouse outlet temperature,
Run 1. 0 c
-------
FURNACE AFTERBURNER LOG SHEET
jT-iZ 3 OMHATOHJ" _ OPERATOR 3 I 6,
orcRATon n'i I i t.
CD
I
cn
m
-5
o>
CD
CD
-S
cr
c
=3
rt>
¦n
o
"O
a>
-5
A>
ZJ
iO
o
iO
AF TEnBURNER
HEATING
CONTROLLER
*F Tt RBURN ER
COOLING
CONTROLLER
"A" FURNACE
ORAFT
CONTROLLER
AFTERBURNER
DRAFT
CONTROLLER
BURNER
Gas/oh
or off
•URNIft •
CAS/OIL
OA Off
A"FURNACE
OR AFT
AFTERBURNER
OR AFT
OKVGEN
CONTfNI
OXYGEN
CONTROLLER
ICMPERA1UHE
DESIRED
CONOI1ION
1 AU
a au
J7Sa
IO AM
/z>e>
12 NOON
7 MJ
i ru
JJYo-
—JLltfa
£2.3 o
Llfa-
tJlVo
^2ria
/7xs:
m:9
/us
i/wr—
LhLU
/
I PU
IOM
It PM
1} MID
I Au
2 AU
J AM
A AU
REMARKS
i Into Fof«p»nan •! and ol 11 • 7 thill,
Rtcotd «ny uninual ocoutrtnoai on your riiitt, «tc, Jul
ALL AfTERBURNER OUTAGES AND THEIR CAUSE MUST RE RiCOftOEO
OPERATOR 7 J
TO
c.
OPERATOR » 11
OfIAATOM n • J
-------
CO
I
-1
(D
00
i
OO
OJ
CO
CD
O
T3
ro
-s
CO
O
lO
?o
c
•Jc
/ &r
operator ? •)
ARTICULATE ABATEMENT LOO SHEET
orinAToni- ii
7*r
OPERATOR (I •
flAGHOUSE
out LET
TEMPERATURE
HjO VALVE
NjO VALVE
*4 2
10FIM
E ,C. OUTLET
TEMPERATURE
BAgHOOSE
A*
HjO PLOW
GPU
AFTERBURNER
DRAFT
I.D FAN
DRAFT
% OPEN
OCSIREO
CONOHtON
fl AM
10 AM
J <2_
12 NOOfS
1 PU
& ru
a pm
a pm
ID PM
It PM
./-2
Rwofd any unuiutl occurrvnai on you* tftilt
¦ tc. Turn into Fort pardon at and of 11-7 ihilt.
COMMENTS
OPERATOR 7
OPERATORS
TSrJfTTs
OPERATOR 11
/9«r
/*?>
-------
r iWfTM
l!
! i : ; ; I : , ; I I 1 I 1 1 ' I I
h S $3^^533^ t*3>'I
d*
II
i;i;iii:j!i|i!iji!i;«uuM
Figure B-7. Spray cooler operating log, Run 2.
B-8
-------
NCCN
Afterburner
temperature
temperature.
Bagheuse
temperature
.MIDNIGHT
Figure B-8. Stripchart of afterburner temperature, spray cooler outlet
temperature, and baghouse outlet temperature, Run 2.
B-9
-------
a
xiu.
pi
Joo
I-
,
'!
¦I1
1 :
[ 4- -! ¦ < - ¦ • ; •
» • ' r f
• n • , i i - •
•
j
i <=>
1 a
11
* K
3 ®
t «
2 3
s a
C Ul
* 3
o
a s
•. 3
ii
\s
l!
s o
l'i
1 c
i 3
a a
S* s
3 LU
> K
1 I
1 ;
s
« e
^ 2
K U4
< a
I §
rt
S
o
<
X
m
a
A
3
4
5
S
c
S
I
s
Sos
53$
«
ii'
•
=j A ;i^i j i 1 i ' : • ! : : 1 ; : ! ! ' \
<
HtV3
w
»3
I i 1 r ; : . i I I • i , ! i |
! 1 | i ; : ! ; : ; ; : i !
X
Z J
oo
>
1
1
j
i
i
i!
i i
i i ! ! ! ; i I ! I ; 1
! ! . , 1 i | ! i I ¦
: ' ' ' ' ! 1 11
5^
5S
!
! !
!
1
! ! ! 1 ! : ! i ! ! ; ! ! ! i
1 1 i i ! i i I ! 111 M 1
j • : . ' ! 1 1 •
5 a
* j
(EX?
1 !
i 1
V-
!11!11
4 W i i
A 1 1
i M ! s
1 i i i i
1 i 1 ! I
: ; i I i
! I i
! i |
11!
i11
M
i i
u £
S-3
ijo
2«5
'°S
? 8
i
I
*
!
if ^
rir
I
0>
n
i i 1
iffl
¦
I ! ! I ! | !
i 1 i ! i M
( «
I it
HI
U
it
3J
* o
<
V
1<
f
r"
0
•
r
I
i
!
i
i
•
AFTERBURNER
COOLING
CONTROLLER
tJ
0
c
0
c
<
J
1 1
1 j
1
i
j
i
j
5 «
fs3
S5«
r"5
5 <¦>
0
(N
V
I
>
<
t
\
MM
i11
Mm
1
I
i
<
K
W
J
\
«s
i
N|
i
N-J
I
c.
tr
N
. N
*
•»
fs
'
t
!
i
j j
1!
j
i
•
:!
5 a
n
3
3
"
3
I
3
1
2
I
?
2
i
1
i
2 2
i
1
22
• i •
2
e
II'
1 r
i 1 I
2!ii3i3
-i -i «*
-¦-> 1
3
?
'
•
3
«
Figure B-9. Afterburner operating log, Run 3.
B-10
-------
Figure B-10. Baghouse operating log, Run 3.
B-ll
-------
11 !l!j! H;j|
,j! ii,|i inn
! I 1 ! ¦ ; f I 5
2 2i|!!'l !;2 | | |
Figure B-ll. Spray cooler operating log, Run 3.
B-12
-------
NOON
ftej&u
emperatu
temperature
Baa ho
A' -NT. T
Figure B-12. Stripchart of afterburner temperature, spray cooler outlet
temperature, and baghouse outlet temperature, Run 3.
B-13
-------
February 21, 1986
Mr. Andrew J. Miles
Senior Scientist
RADIAN CORPORATION
P.O. Box 13000
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709
Re: React Plant Operating Information
Dear Andrew:
We have reviewed the draft test report forwarded to
.p.l and have no corrections or comments to offer. The
operating data we promised for the test period is presented below:
1. Spent Carbon Volatiles
Total Volatiles Moisture - Organics - %w/w
Date % W/W % w/w (By Difference)
5/29/85 52.5 36.4 16.1
5/30/85 48.8 37.2 11.6
5/31/85 48.4 36.0 12.4
2. Production Rate
Date React Product - Lbs
5/29 47,894
5/30 62,605
5/31 60,987
3. Baghouse Dust
Date Lbs. Collected
5/29 4,980
5/30 5,186
5/31 4,666
B-14
-------
Overall, the data appears to be £airly typical o£ routine
operations at the plant. If you require any
additional information to complete your final report, please call
me at the direct dial number listed above.
Very truly yours,
B-15
-------
APPENDIX C
Field Data Sheets
-------
APPENDIX C.l
MM5-Inlet Run Sheets
C-l
-------
PLANT ^ tta.
I
t low *T
FIELD DATA
OAlt
SAMPLING LOCA
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
U tjkss
J££1
NL£T*
il£_
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ibj -» y
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE /M }p ^ *
STATIC PRESSURE
C '"TOR Q.5T9
PROBE HEATER SETTING 2S~Q
HEATER BOX SETTING 2.«TE>
REFERENCE Af. b.U)
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
lcakaatc th&ug*mzzl**
0.008 cuf+/***~* oO Si*
ORV/GAS METER FACTOR (Y) / riftS* 3
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
8£A0 ANO RECORB ALL DATA EVERY jg MINUTES
vrwkft I
6.001
Treverte
Point
NUMtMr
ISALHll
I f+V*
Sampling
Tlx
Mtn.
Clock
TIm
(24-hr
Clock)
Gat Meter
Reading
(V,). IL»
Velocity
Heed
lit.).
in. H*0
Slack
Orlfece
Pre*lure
Otfferentlel
(AH. in. H,0)
Taaparatura r^WICtrcIa Om)
fUBp
Vacuua
In. Ng
w
filter
Pfbt
Rtcl/c.
in
Absorbent
<3rr
Dry Cat Mater
lapfngar
fT)
lnlat
lJry?
Outlet
hri
Oct 1 red
Actual
W
Out
0
/v.VS"
-/7~
J5
1 h:so
Got, to
O.^O
2
/. Z
V2.
as'
2W
¦
Uf-
er
10 0
«I8
%
17
" 12-
lb
n:st
6t>3.HI
3?
tLl 3
/,2-
A>
222
26f
—
fio
73
(66
11
*8
/<
LoL.LV
6,Y^
/«;
AY
w
-
162.
1&
9o
/6V
M
"1^
2*
1&0S
LoH.&lf
o.to
ml
/,>
/. >
J?7^
5if
-
I&B
1H
/6/
(13
<*<
2Z.
A X^D
Jt. rf-O 4» ^
7 s 1
wCft"
o.c/
-TH
V*
^ 0
*
smm-
10
/fw
4// 537
0
' *1
air
o.^fi
tT/Z.
/.r
itr
—
131
72
/oz.
m
Lz.
s
" 11
36
<5'.3o
Col» . 10
/(.11
A3
3lj
—
137
e/
/65
/Z3
63
6
- /f
K.'SS
*>*/. 35
Mf
/•7
/-V
lit
3ii.
—
W
€l
(OS
63
(0
- If
^0
/v'.'Va
O-fS'
16^
/'V
2-n
3?z
—
137
6/
/<5fi
'22.
7
-/£>
6^
(£,.' 6 0
03^.3
0.53
/&??
AC»
J,(s
32-
~
/a3
7£
fo9
I2<
(0 2-
1
*V\lCr
? ^
UJ
STbP
WtTT
COMtENTS
-------
o ch ai/vtr> - 6 r - { Z<^ 3
TnmrM
Point
Ntafcar
SaaplIng
Tlaa '
Mln.
Clock
tim
(24-hr
Clock)
fiat Mater
Beading
(«„). »l*
Velocity
Ha ad
<4Ct),
«n.H,0
Stack
&
Or!face
Pretiure
Ot fferentlal
/AM in M.n\
Inptr«turil!fM (Circle Ona)
Puap
Vacuia
In. Hg
[in»
Raclrc.
w
Abtortant
s?r
Ory Ga
* Matar
laplogar
-^Ti
••
Dulrtd
Actual
Sldn
*Y>
Out
Inlat
Out 1at
PVf\
1
H.:*?
<>W|, 7ff
O.S^o
nii.
/.r
k336
—
N
m
//ft
1 1 tr
D7
^ iT
/J3
70
IL:io
6^./^
0.Y8
1712.
/•1
hf
W/
3 n
—
\n-
LI
//6
ITS'
Q
«
°l
7ff*
f(o-l ^
4»V«.6fl
6. 5 V
/611
/.6
A 6
ai/
36/
—
/a.4
68
//o
nc
61^
8
80
ILIZo
(csa^*
0,5 <
ten
/.i
A 7
^1/
—
IV
ioifi
/10
)3il
5?
6
ft
65
1 u x<
U>Ti . 7/
0.57
/7/t
AiT
Oifi
14/
—
73
Uo
\rf
8
ft
7o
/t/30
657 20
0.5^>
/7Z2.
Ar
A/1
157
27z
—
|X6
-76
lit
17^
(fit
8
S
If
IL.
66?.7 £
O.Sb
/?63
/• 7
A 7
^CS
(It
LJ
III
U
9
Q
loo
/fc.V*
os5T
i54
3o^
103
*>1
1/V
/33
7
7
//o
/<>: so
<613.66
6.SC
/7<>y
/• 7
A 7
260
—
^Z2-
/?3
6-\
/c
7
/'£"
677.
0.5 3
/7/o
f-fc
U
2^2,
—
/OS"
IS/
GS"
/o
7
IX o
n;
(460.JJ
6.57
/6H
/- 7
A 7
zcr/
28^
—
/dO
(o7
//?
176
47
11
U
/2^
1 Tos~
OH J
/tn
/•v
/y
5157
SIB
—
If
'(/
<•?
9
4
/JO
n: 10
U&7,88
GS$
A 7
A?
231
3 DC
—
8/
1f
!»/
70
1/
4»
/35"
n;
W/
0.53
/6&>
A 6
3Y3
in
1 r
;&7
^"2-
7/
II
6
/VO
1 7,'ZO
M<.7S
0.53
ice/
/. &>
A 4
7^3
L&l
—
62.
76
loc
/ 2-/
72-
II
.5
tV(f
17> 2^
MSLf
M7
/.y
278
7^
7 4
/toS"
\V)<
"7*
H
b
/S-o '
J 7,1°
^03.0$
O-HZ .
l(o(o 8
A4#
Ay
237-
27o
—
73
7<
7y
ft
5
/*
t(
5
j(pO
nva
70 5.62.
O.V<
/kit
/>f
'¦r
X2S
—
1J>
73
JbL
Il.T
II
Y
/*er
n.a,'
7f £
7^
/bf
/p
16
ng
nis.Mi
o/fa
(Uf
A3
/•3
7/2
l&S
—
(oL
1* 2
//<;
10
(60
/s;co
12I.(*<
0. V 0
/6/7
A >
/•>
2/fl
211
to(e
11-
101
//v
1
10TAL
•
•
•
•
•
•
»•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
AVERAGE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-------
PLANT
DATE _
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
SUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
G iTf O?
J-iELU uaTA
"ZTnLff
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE _
SIATIC PRESSURE .(,2+
22-/
253
—
lot
1{
11
no
6"7
$
2~
Z/o
JK.lo
736
o.a'x
1261
0,(fi3
0,1
o.c,9
Hi
-
I
iz
10)
112-
67
8
/
2PS"
/ff/VS"
7^-62.
0.l3
10/
0Ho
in
*71
-
13
1*1
mm
66
6
/
13 o
1H1.70
0.1 .H*
W
IV
m-
—
69
ioi
ni
66
£
/
IHo
il: tro
nsi.iHZ
0-13
1601
0, *to
0,^0
nf
asi
&o
be
ft)(o
as
LB
6
| UL*i<£>
0»OI3L
-F4*/J
T '
l\ 11
K
s
/
J
d
f
\
y j
iHO
mi
~
)IZ
j
* 7~
COMMENTS
-------
plant ^SiTE O °)
CATE 5/30f&f
FIELD DATA
PROgE LENGTH ANO TYPE
MOillE 1.0. O
&-/Y- cjtasS
SAMPLING LOCATION ttJLPT
SAMPLE TYPE AVM £~
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
02- Ql-/Y)MS-fiT-l*
mmium 10 "F v caocecre
PRESSURE -g 7. 3. &-£?. /6 \ Z*-0
'**£ «V "!¦ 8
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC
STATIC PRESSURE
FILTER NUMBElLtO fc^ !°tf 3
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME J
ASSUMED MOISIURE, X
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER _
METER BOX NUMBER _
METER A Hf
C FACTOR
i
TW
Qsl
PROBE HEATER SETTING .3 TP
HEATER BOX SETTING 2
REFERENCE Ap
—— InrhoA U«Jkirotfi''3-0.0?. -fvVoL- '£) l2ir>l4r%'
+Vjrpwt»V» ir«ottlx-
ORY/GAS METER FACTOR (V) /.t>OS3
SCHEMATIC Of TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ ANO RECORD ALL OAT A EVERY MINUTES
S-TAKT
Trivirti
Point
Nurixr
rvartzLa
Swllnt
T1m
Mln.
Clock
T(m
{24-hr
Clock)
Gil M*t«r
R«»dtng
Vacuua
In. Hf
w
fltUr
ftfiSe
Cofti-lNfi
At>soH>«nt
¦«?
Orv Git M*t«r
liplngir
Inlet
w
OutUt
0*1(r«d
Actu«l
Out
w
0
ty: vo
755. 02O
233
/2-
5
/V'VS"
l&K
!<* 8H
7.1
/7
0^-
m
—
Si
1L
SH
83
/*¦'
to
H.'S°
76/. ^2-
o.s<
!U 87
/7
3^7
—
/6 8
(*V
&<
Sfi
/O-
K
/y.sr
76 £.31-
0,
P
16%
61-
ic>
//
30
/5.-/C
-71£,.02-
0,
$t>
5A3
/6 ft
63
92-
m
1/
//
35
!5:i£~
111. <06
o.sq
!&>&*
(.1
7
267
hi
—
113
&
29?
—
/o<£»
(M
?8
10$
lis
to
/S«'JS~
O.S^
(7
/. 7
2&1
-
/or
<°1
too
/2.2-
67
/o-
to
ao
/fi¥o
TTV.o*
6.SZ
f-1
A7
a**?
2£(
—
/o^
(0(0
lof
11-
1
(*<
/sv/C
60) t(o3
O.sS
iUHt
f- 7
'•7
PV1/
W
—
(0(0
loir
)Z^
6g
17-
1
70
5o
BcXtZZi-
o.sn
f6? 0
in
/• 7
3Y2.
7ns
70/
LH
hH
ixi
l-2->
0
1
CX>c^pLtt- rv-otr
-------
0
1
Traverte
folnt
Nuabar
Sampling
11m
Mtn.
Clock
TIm
(24-hr
Clock)
t» Hater
Reading
(vB>. ft*
Velocity
Hood
(AP.h
in. «,0
SUck
u£h
(*>
Ortface
Prutur*
Differential
(AM in u.m
^ ¦ ' ¦ ¦ 7 — —rf?—
lNp«rtturi.'Fdt (Circle Orv«)
Pwp
Vacuut
In. Hg
niu»
UKU+ii
nt>v it w •
Abiortant
'/Sr <
Dry G*
t Hater
iMlnger
m
1. "
(totlred
Actual
Out
Inlat
Outlet
£p«*>
1
ns'
8© 6.&o
0.S9
fiB?
AG
^yo
2C8
—•
tot
(fi(o
;of
/Z2-
/T-
1
BO
/too
€iX to
C>+Ce>0
*71
/.«
h 6
23 8
Vc&
—
ICO
tv
/oi
117-
LI
/3
e
ss
/{,:&<
gtL. 5
'£>£6
65"
/of
/2r
70
//
fi
la
!(*>'• t °
8DOO%
X.o
-
%
6^
/0£
llL>
11
/ST
&
tr
ILK
623. & °
6,0,0
/. 7J
,?•*
2*
2S®
—
/
/«?
25b
27?
—
7<=>
/2 9
/07
7
lie
(.(f *fo
<£Y3./
Om0
/tn
277
—
?7
/.!/
6 S
1?
£»
n s
Ui5
rV7.c
a, 55
/<. it
/
850.36*
O, &£)
(LTL
/. ^
2-Z7
267
~
*7/
/29
17
4>
ns
lus<
5SV.X/
O.io1
tuil
2~
^3/
373
—
t-s i
iO-l
/07
t7
18
3
fts
ir.0<
«»5,77
Q1(0(0
!o&*
2.0
23 Z.
272
7^
4>r
AP7
/07
^7
/€>
5
/S-c
/7,/a
e<&&3
0.(c 3
r.i
l.l
23i
25?
—
7r
/-a 7
107
66
/6
£
is£~
n:K
€?£*<&
0S<
IU?>
/•7
(-7
Z32i
P7t
(g
107
C>&
n
/CO
n:%o
871./(p
o.sY
HtSf
/'7
t-1
22 S"
7/
<*<>
/a7
f07
66
17
/C.<
n"if
gK.IS
0s*>
tut
/r
223
1? 7
Co 3
/26
i°l
(06
n
H
iio
/vis
880.2*)
o.sC
/U1
^•7
^7
2/7
2S3
—
43^
yj®-
Ib8
<7
Y
/7fT
tr.
eez.71
0,50
(u>7
Ar
/.r"
213
5So
-*
(0(0
t%9
Kk°\
6?
17
r*
IA 0
ir.yo
BB7. fie
0.95
fal?
/.v
0:10
2V4
(pC
fc/t
IJ8
m
W
/^>
lesr
tr. *C
$903?
a3r
im
it
il/
—
Lf
I'xe
*01
ii
3
i°lO
/rVo
613.3S
6.33
[Hli
/.o
M
200
—
tv
aj
(01
13
IOIAI
•
*>VCKACt
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-------
STC Q?.—
s/so/a C
PUNT
DATE _
SAMPLING iOCAIlON
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
MET
AVIS'
o%t
FIELD DATA
&F-Z-
AMB1ENT TEMPERATURE 'JO *F
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE O 9-1/ tJW.cXLj -6>r
STATIC PRESSURE (P#) 8
FILTER iUmER <•> - ^
MIHINLM sample volume
PROBE LENGTH ANO TYPE
(o
3
Ms*
1T.S<
&%.zt
3. So
HI'S
0.9/
0?/
m
27 f
—
^2-
/XG
;o9
6,?
li-
3
2oo
is:oo
<89?./^
C>.3S\
Hi J
&$d''
fsr
itfa
—
4,5"
tdf
*70
fe
,2
aar
|8;oS*
loi.ajo
0.^3
ifif
o.Vo
4 Vt>
£*<
> —
£>J
63
l>2-3
M
-71.
7
£
-2/0
/«:/o
<)o3.2 /
DH*l
0.^7
o.hi
I5&
53;
M
U
11
lb S
12-
e
2.
f&'/S"
Ol<
UUo
A ^7
/£3
25
6/
(p(o
US
i^7
13
8
2.
^2o
/6,2jd
'ion. 30
C>A<
in&
a.V7
6H7
/67
2i<
) -
6/
Q>7
itY
6
1
is: OS
70B.S7
OxSh •
S3?
OJ^
O.fjt
/6*
£3
!-
S?
in
Ib^
Y
/
a3o
ie:3<>
*>7. 7£>
o,o 1>
Slo
)./5
£>./r
/sy
) —
57
(ol
/a?
t03
lb
v5
/
2 35"
?/A £5
£>.e>3
6U8
o.tg'
/fTo
58
(*6
<°7
103
1$
J
5V"
9U.I2-**
0.o3
($33
o./r
O.if
fte
S?
08
fbl
IdO-
nio
5"
—f
J
1
\
/
t-io
15"?,\
-------
FIELD DATA
t> -
5 | 311 &S"
XMkfclL
PLANT _
OATE _
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TVPE M^g
RUN NUMBER 03 . fi
FILTER NUMBER (O ~
H 3
N022LE 1.0.
A.3t<
ASSUMED MOISIURE, X
33
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
a* ^
METER BOX NUMBER
METER A H»
l.a^
C FACTOR
0.S1
PROBE HEATER SETTING 25^ F
HEATER BOX SETTING
?&> r
REFERENCE An
0.L0
M1NJMUH SAMPLE VOLUME ~
inUwlUk.kck*cJc.Uj^e- s Ox>l3LfPj^xe5l5 IM MATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
0»t/CAS METER FACTOR (Y) i. 005 "3
inrnAi V
Irtvorto
Point
Ntabor
JXrft.IL
Soapl log
Ttao
Nin.
•WfAIW
Clock
Tlao
(24-hr
Clock)
***** V.PT
fiat Motor
Rooming
(V0). *l»
tryn*-1
Velocity
Hood
|ap ),
In.HiO
Slock
r*
Orlfoct
Protturo
OtllorontUI
/ AM in U.n\
(Clrclo One)
Pkap
Vocuuo
In. Ht
w
(il»OP
flU>«e
Abtortiont
$r
Dry Go
f Motor
lapingor
l~'l * |
Oottrod
Actual
SJlfl
Out
m
Inlot
Out lot
o
ft' 10
ItH.n ST.
»Z.
5
lo;ir
1/t.s
0«6o
Itfi7
1.1
1.9
as7
a^i
—
S6
&2-
7¥
12.
<0
u>;*a
^T.z.1
o ,t>o
{l>tt
7-9
/, 9
3o^l
—
/o5
O
Or
7^"
5,?
,r
1"*-
/ »Uo
\{eV>
l.tf
1.6?
—
5^
«?
7-ff
/,*r
7.5S
$
97
5 *7
7?
~s*
//
"L$
to
a.L*
(4>V
/-3
1u6o
/.7
/¦?
13L
-2S(
—
?6
tfi
SC>
Uo
s
n
to So
W3J0
o.se
((,8/
/,*
us**
Q¥f
n
5(e
/o/
8 J
to
/o
/o;5T
wt.lef
0.0/
/i,&o
2><*
233
—*
S7
/or
83
(oC
4>
/o
5"o
//; o ,
!<*8L
A*
SA
£3
no
«7
60
6
lo
Sir
17$ >17'
o<(* 7
till
2J>
JLo
133
??3
—
7S
l/o
87
6o
C
lo
(oO
1/.-10
TS6 83
C,U 1
tueo
3*0
£0
2YO_
?flZ
is"
(l^
6^
C.T-
4
kilt?
%Q.76
o,fr&
t^er
t64
2-V3
-2"7i
75-
UZ.
//V-
9/
C.3
6
9
7o
i i;xo
d.biT
Q,£>
lt2.
*7'
' —
Vz
Q6
//'
C£"
(a
ST3*T
O
I
CAMCMIS
-------
o 7- mm c - B JT -
TrtvarM
faint
Nu*«r
SMpltag
T laa
Mtn.
Clock
riM
(24-hr
Clock)
(Ui tUtmr
litdlng
£>/&
0-7£
2.2
?V7
lit
/O/
c>%
s
0>
?.S~®
0,70
(Ml
2^t>
w
— •
7/
)V
i 02-
s
(o
/3°
/*. lo
j
<3.fc3
!&>83
ha
/,&
' —
7^
IVL
/o£
fo8
7
K
/3 r
tX7^
ion.36
tkl*
—
If
Co
113
103
aa.t>o
0.7^
tm
a.>
731
14/
-
11
6¥
\VX
|63
8
=7
'tr
'^r
/*> 2^,?6
0,6$
HtS'f
2.*
^3?
U5"
C>o
\u
(03
s
/r»
/*V«
/6^./6
0\(*0
Itsi
l<8
/,&
23f
Z^f
—r.
U
m
H
8
s
/V
l*(o
u
257
—
ve
/d2
11
5
i
/7<3
13; fz>
J* W.Zi
!&>
/.*
!>
/3.AS"
toy % if
o.sf
lOl
/.6
/.b
2/2
—
Ly-
L~b
Hi
Id 6
7V
7
(SO
/3: io
/0 SI.H3
JO. Co
fan.
M
I#
2/0
ZK
—
H7-
77
75^
3>
13: K
tO?Z,06
0.52"
(S2<-
u
2/0
2fi3
—
{*!>
(of
U 3
7?
ne
(?
3-
\10
2.0
itse,^
a,^
(S03
/.e
Lg
20S
2f3
—
lo}
L<
m
7*
77
101 At
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
AVtRAGf
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
1
o
-------
H>»1
FIELD DATA
DAT!
SAMPLING
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
s'/3i/8^
location
tHUET
PROBE LtNGIH ANO TYPE
MULE 1.0.
Avi^*
/)3 och/V)fi)£> -/3T- 3
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE _
STATIC PRESSURE (P,)
flLTLR NUMBER <»)
I
LL31
g<.
3
/?f
/3.'2£-
/oU ,17
<5,So
ft? 7
h*
t.f
20?
277
—
67
//>
7^
18
8
*rb
)3;r»o
it^.n
/£?<9
13
/.3
3©/
—
62.
m-
m
n
7
2.
3L^
)333<
Lt)(,«.43
AIT
'33 <»
OJZ
6.13
(8&
3*2
—
to
16
I/O
T8
11
5
1
2Jt>
ii.t*
C.&-?
135 J
h*
A®
i?s
23/
—
LL
1)0
11
>5
2.
US
ty.^
H>Tt3£
o.2> o
/311
{-I
—
6f
11
W
71
2.
7Xb
ltnl.US
0.37
/j«sy
l-t
iv :
—
(p)
lo-b
113
78
7
1
in
p;s<
/a«*.3a
6.710
//&/
0.77
<5.77
f7V
*7f
¦W.
5<\
63
l/Y
I Ob
7f
S
I
ob
0.2^
0.9 ^
*73
f "*
(o\
U>b
113
{DO
7/
vS"
1
Z2^
foar.70
b 7?
0?J
0.^3
frf .
&2
—
tt> t
//f
/OO
>5
1
ZHo
f^/o
/ose, ttf
aXf
0.73
/SB
-—•
b 1
!
$,uU
/
/
4
VW\ '
Y el#**-
/
u
f
>
' /
-^Yb
nssrrt-
| ^ 60.1
y
1.11
/(?3.
7S
O
I
*rop
CflHHli ^ cj^i IaJ f 1 foo^) W
-2,3-^7
-------
APPENDIX C.2
MM5-0utlet Run Sheets
C-13
-------
/\*
fs.-W c>^
PLANT
DAIf 5 f
SAMPLING LOCATION /"YjV\e"\
sample type tMikZ
-x<7. •*/
-¦sr" Ht.o"
FILTER NUMBER (») -
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
FI EL© BATA
RUN NUMBER (Jj Cf 1 ¦'/>f/W /
operator Ateo*^ /G.j^n.L tfik
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE (Pf)
rr
Af-3
PROBE LENG1H ANO TYPE
NOZZLE l.O. .3g> X
__ I
G>
ASSUMED MDISIURE, X_
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
MEIER BOX NUMBER
METER A Hi 4
C FACTOR .
2il
ICl
ZH
PROBE HEATER SETTING £<=>
HEATER BOX SETTING
REFERENCE Aft ¦ H±.
SCHEMATIC «F TRAVERSE POINT
READ ANO RECORD ALL DATA EVERY J!
DRY/GAS METER FACTOR (Y)
IIYOUT
MINUTES
Trovcrto
Soiling
TIm
Nln.
Q
»4$fe
Clock
TIm
(24-hr
Clock)
c«t miir
Rtiding
(VJ. ft*
Voloclty
K*ad
(AP->.
In. MjO
Stack
V
InW
Orif*c«
Prouuro
Olfftnntlil
nu i_ u n\
T*ap«ntur* fE^°C (Circl* Ono)
Pta«)
Vocjua
In.
Prot>«
cm..
Rccirc.
VlUr
Abtorbent
Trap
Dry Cm
i M«Ur
Iaplngor
Exit
Paint
ihat>«r
D««lr«d
Actual
Skin
Out
InUl
Vm l«>
Out lot
out>
A- b
z
*4
HV.Ml*
, 53
W
I.5C
1-3 S
—
. r
^5"
tt?
5"
k
)0
If 0&
.3^
l>
—
&
—
—
4S
u
•» H
7
V
15
o£
Ltc.u
,^7
/•i'
1.^
—
?Ft
—
<.r
§-v
4> l
7
Vj
Jo
IO
.^8"
J.5ST
i.ss-
—
254
—
—
4?
l\3>
ts-
7 &
5 ft
2*
>C
L$3,do
310
1
wS
—
Zfcfc
—
—
115"
fe(o
§
Ja
Jo
bh6-l'i>
^7
.pjl
». S
1.5
—
IS>\
-
—
^ Sr
£7
£
S ft
34
l*J.s3
-37
"VII
1-5
lr<
—
til
—
1
& P
/<3
< P
10
io
LH2.32
^0
\.S
i.t
'
-
—
l\ci
^ V
1 0
.3
pa
v>7
7
4 #
So
^ o
y^.v7
.3*
\.SS
i-SS
ZLo
—
—-
b*
/^>/
rr
?
H 4
5*
Mi
\.6?),VS
.4 1
\.*
l.*
—
Oft\
—
—
yn
yi?6
/05
S*
4 •
\>o
56
irb/73
,-.M\
34a
i*
1.fir
2U
—
—
L<\
/50
/6i
5~y
f.S"
*
*6
IbO.&O
(3-r
/3^
—
—
n
'0^
L ^
^¦5"
3 «
TO
Jboo
6b 3. bo-
fl<
2-77
—
—
LJl
/^3
rb.ejo
,2*
^3
/¦IS
—
—
—
i-z
/.as"
/0 g
n
COtWENTS
-------
5Tof
3TAHT
/\'J
Tra»ar»a
Point
NurtMr
nr
Sailing
TIm
Nln.
l(,o?
Clock
TIm
(24-hr
Clock)
fcfeb.9 o
Gat Mater
Reading
(V.). ft*
Velocity
Ha ad
* in. 'HjO
Stack
¦ X
Orifaca
Prattur*
Differential
/AM in M.A1
.. jr
Taaptratur* lft/*C (Clrcla Ona)
Puap
Vacuus
in. Hg
Probt
t< ii»
Reel re.
Watar
Abfopt>«nt
Trap
Dry Ga
( Matar
l^tlngtr
(Kit
\*"'l "¦
Diftfrtd
Actual
Skin
put
Inlat
Outlat
out^
fit-71
^0
/O
klbM
'.33
/3:T
/3r
—
fsZ
—
—
^3
as
sr
7
z
55
t>73A*
.31
/¦?*
—
lbt>
-
—
/ar
/06
5"7
7
3
lo
Jd
b 7 (»•% ^
7HI
/¦?
'3
—
zSl
—
/><»
/aw
/o$
«r^
1
2
75-
¦xf
Lbs.ofc
,3o
n\
/ "Z-
/.X
—
2*7
—
-?J
/J?V
/« 6
^7
7
2
/DO
3d
M. *7
.2e
J.-L
/.I-
—
ZVL
-
—
73
( 6f
,5<,
7
I
/OS
3/
fcfrb. $4
.74*
f T-
/'^
—
Xtl
—
IH
/G°!
sa
7
/
I/O
btf.-w
rto
1*
.tY
—
zs-j
—
—
/tjo
m
5"r
&
1
l/S
Hi
1,12. rW
'Z-X
ft*
.%r
—
7^
—
—^
i> 3
MO
5*r
1
/Ho
it
M.137
.1^
.9*
—
«««
— .
L\
//V-
5"^
4
d/-f^
£J±
£>0.
/AO
nan
^.^77
/as
<*
.11
33 Jr
'•}
—
—
—
' bl
/oa
/oZ
^3
Co
!»
/3a
H
?6o.S o
,2.7
331
11
/. /
—
-
—
1 \>i
/»/
JO 0
sn
'6
L
11
7*510
,
/•5
f./S"
—
27V
—
—
11
?r
\Y¥
/y«
m
1 ot,t7
. t-fe>
33 Sr
/.J*
/.of
—
277
—
—
is'
<*fr
IV
gY
3
r
*
il
nnSi>
^7
,Y
-V
79
?
Oib
•>
—
Sit
f7
1 6
67
H
/
n/(e,2
/0^
3^1
,-L
. "L.
—
Orl
—
—
S1
Y
* 1*
/?<»
«5>
-)/q. ?
. ? 7
,?va
fif
—
-
—
63
?
/IS
s1?
7J?
,3 V
'>9
C, 7
f/
7
Y
)%0
iert
-n
•
•
•
•
•
L^,
Ju.ty
•
•
-------
S /"f-e c> *\
FIELD DATA
PLANT
OAK f-Xt- g»g*
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPt
PROBE LENGIH AMD TYPE
MOZiLC 1.0. • 3Q&
/
RUN NUMBER &*{' HA* ST- /V".
OPERATOR /fiyArvLi*
AMBIENT TEMPERA I USE - 3*^
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
ASSUMEO MOISTURE. X
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER _
MEIER BOX NUMBER _
MEIER iNt
C FACTOR
i o
1.1"
STATIC PRESSURE (PJ
fTITER NUMBER <»> —
MINIMUM SAMPLE VOLUME
rt^o
3
PROBE HEATER SETTING b&h>
HEATER BOX SETTING 1 SO
REFERENCE ftp \1~
QRY/GAS METER FACTOR (V)
.
Outlet
«. out>
Da tired
Actual
Skin
Out
3
/fj¥
733, (
.37
A**
/.fi
/>s
?3&
J
!
6>&
&9
f-D
I
3
/,?S
/.,?S
/.3S
.
7^0
m
£>9
e
1
J
7Y3.3
.as
,?VJ
/n?S
/,?5
A?
9/
?o
j?
J
Si
-7U6.&
3V2
A?-5
/i>S
P?
?o
P?
£,7
£9
cr
r
/
V9
7SC.Y
3.??
//.S"
A/s
Pw
70
f°l
7
f
£3o
,?/
7St. 5
,3 £
WJ!
/,/-S
A/3
9/
9/
7
(
PIS
y-Wi
*?<&£
.33
3 W
/,3fc
A2t>
m
cfO
90
cs
?
(
fW/)
i^y
,33
/.#>
/&>
L .
1
£7
9/
7/
C>£>
'?
*
J
J
J
-Lio
I SCl y43
"tl
1?^
\vi>
itfX-
o
COMMENTS
-------
fee
*.«W
Pk»iT
,«o^
.Ot^
PUNT
OA IE S-tt 3Q ~ ^
SAMPLING toe AT low VeV
SAMPLE TYPE fA 3- O 9 ' !W fil *h> ~ PtO ' t-
OPERATOR )£ ftftr<-i ft _
jrft' -76* F
AMBIENT TEMPERATUil
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
"70
STATIC PRESSURE (P^) —.MS ' W d
FILTER NUMBER r
REFERENCE &p .£* 6
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT
REA0 AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY 1
DRY/GAS METER FACTOR <*) 7 ft1
IVOUT
MINUTES
Treverie
Point
ft
Stapling
1.
In. Ht0
Stack
Orlface
Pretture
Differential
(&H. In. H,0)
iHptriturJ/^'C (ClrcU 0n«>
1
PlMpi
Vacuus.
In. Ht
Profea
Filter
Reclrc.
Water
Atotorbent
Trap
Dry Gat Meter
Inplnaer
fait
Inlet
Deal red
Actual
Skin
Out
ft - ky
5
MS
its'
/./r
,
lit
—
—
*71
(•
1 0
£0
*7 it SB
/.z
/.x
—
2$t
-
—
73
*1
«3
l<
$<
-7^.11
-3S"
3s£
h/t
K($
—
m
—
—
15"
S-b
44
xo
i soo
7^. 10
.3<1
34t
'¦3
/.!>
—
3b3
—
—
n
6m
|o
5"
2*
7^.3^
."bis
^5-
/.• ^
Ac
—
U1
—
Lf
/«3
5-4
bf
1
5
30
ID
."it-
3S1
/.•r
/cX
—
2il
—
—
iq
/0 t
S *
U>
i'
r
(t<
—
^Jf
—
—
bi
/o?
t-y
LU
S
20
7U5-1
•3V
f'tr
///
—
—
/
(a
M
froa7 IT
.vv
.Vy
27?.
—
—
L<\
Hi
Li?
y
ro
lo
So-i.-N
,/t-
3Hi
.Y-/
ru
—
—
U
fi7
LI
5s
3?
%CW. 71
./V
7^
• 4/
—
tin
—
~
L7
f2o
?r
V
6
H
lb
44
&oti;
./V
,wjr
—
—
—
(2o
LX
lo
*
L<
M<
fcos
ftfc,
/•I
—
—
LI
/Ho
t»o
/o
3
n4
So
$13.*<»
"JM7
/.**
—
—
—
11
fh
7?
S-f
/O
3
7$
Si
J^W:'
,M0
115
/3<
I3S
—
—
—
U
tir
^ y
Louj Doe 4t> b*uA 5-Vw<-K
-------
o <7 - c.
Orifice " ... I !
Traverse
foinl
Mu*«r
Sapling
TIm
Mln.
15
Clock
TIm
(24-hr
Clock)
IS5 s
fcU.Sfco
fiat Meter
Heading
(v.). fi«
Velocity
Head
(AP.).
K*H,0
Stock
.I*
Orlface
Pressure
Dllferentlal
(AH. In. H,0)
leeneratur* *F/*C (Circle One)
Pm|»
Vacuus
In. Hg
Prgfce
Filter
Dec Ire.
Meter
Abiortxnt
Tru
Cry Ce
^Inlet
l.>
t Meter
Outlet
Iaplnger
Cult
Oetired
Actual
Skin
Out
h'*
%o
ibo o
SlS/W
Mt
•*H
l.M
l>4
—
Z
I
10$
a*
,3V
*m
i^a&
l,*9
—
2fcl
-
—
/5-s
lop
JO
•
ho
3d
IT.
141
J.z
i n
—
?S5
—
kS
(21
»o \
^C>
1
uf
36
SH3 2<»
.37
?14
/•*-
IZ.
—
23W
—
—
in
ipf
101^
to
1 o
I
1©
,*i
3H1
'•?
1.3
—
2io
—
—
ia
!*<.
/<»3
L-l.
/e>
Cl-\
SMC,
?b
> ft
T
ia )
('O
i
!?>>
bj
•^1
?*Jo
1 o
l.o
—
37j(
—
—
feS
*1
/«>
L
IHQ
*0
*s?.s
,513
3f2.
/,/
//
t-
X2
—
—
??
/Q
*
/VS
/S
2£0.~?
i
3V»
/-*
A3
?57
—
—
6*7
/o
> vto
3 V?
A*
'3
W
—
—
96
/°
-r
/SS
>15
XC.7.3
/--<
n
<&S
—
-
??
9y
C,V
s
/^o
tOa.V
.?V*
/¦?
/•I
—
-
—
97
, CiS
o
ILS
?5
.V/
?y&
US
-
—
—
yj
94
u
((
¦ ^
V
no
PYP-O
.3?
,? yd
/
A3
A3
—
pyvj
—
—
67
9^
93
6S"
/>
V
(V\
S80.H
f.9?
A3
-
33&
-
-
65
93
9*
^,5"
//
31
3V5
7/3
J3
PiV
—-
—
9^
92
//
l
IfS
/-?S3T
X&C..2
,3C,
3%>
/--?
A*
¦-
w
-7/
9/
9/
/o
101AL
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ftVfAAGl
m
«
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-------
g.jg 0*1
FIELD DATA
PLANT
OATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TVPt M ftV.
BUN NUMBER CL O
tA\*\
Off BAT OS
AMBIENT TEMPESAIUBi
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE
ORy/GAS METER FACTOR <*) , S S 7 ft
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAV|
READ AND RECORO ALL DATA EVERY
LAYOUT
MINUTES
Trivirti
Point
Nt^Mr
SMplIng
T1m
Nln.
Clock
Mm
(24-hr
Clock)
Gtt M*t«r
liidlng
(va). ft»
Velocity
Hud
(APJ.
In. H,0
Stick
Or(f«c*
Prtiturt
Oif(«r«ntl«l
(AH. In. H,0)
Inn«r
Dry Cat Mittr
laplngor
E*U
Inlet
Outlet
9 A? .3
>*9
M6,
A/X
/*/$
3??
J
7/
C7
/a
J
Ol%
70S.!
.31
/.0
(.0
P9o
&C*
?*
£-?
*n
A3©
2
SI
i»7
(nS
r
C
Vh
3y/
,7*
Wf
<**
f?
«P7
,"l/ 7^6
-------
PLANT
£JL
(7~
£_
FIELD DATA
SAMPLING LOCATION ^Uvi.' Otljhtf'
SAMPLE TYPE /T\/Y)S
PROBl LENGTH AMD TYPE _
NOZZLE 1.0. » 3oV
RUN NUHBER(2
OPERATOR
AMBIENT Ti
ms-/h
tmm ~)o
ASSUMED MOISTURE, X
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER _
MEIER BOX NUMBER _
METER A H»
C FACTOR
JL£_
J£l
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE *2-?.97
_S2_
/7d
STATIC PRESSURE > 5 S<
OR*/GAS METER FACTOR (Y) . 997 f
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AND RECORD ALL 0A1A EVERY ^ MINUTES
T rwirti
Point
tUmbtr
Stapling
TIm
MIa.
Q
Clock
TIm
(24-Hr
C lock)
/"ol
5
<5&?,5
.4/7
J.C
J.(J
C>f
"76
S3
f ¦)
L
l£>
, &>
63-
7$
£>JP
(f
/5
/7
AS
AS
CC
7/
c,s
/A
Co
933.9
• Y5
3*?
'<5
IS
aw
a
fa
72
(j
%
ps
^>
90
76
7/
ft
s
37
i3i,
A2
7ft
ft
7i
-?o
( /
5
4a
<7V£, P
-31
3M
U<
/./£
aiS
fl/
V?
?
'{
H
V*5
V7
¦ ir |
,3&
M
/,?
ft
Of
n
Y
5b
OS3.i
32?
/,/s
J,iS
•
1
3>»
(0 i9
#3
Ce
t(
V
s«s
^7
< .^1
"V?
/--*
/A
cJ
/ot
fs-
£,?
//
y
>
/I
»So
22*
J'l
/•?
?Yff
/D
-------
rvi
ro
Treverte
feint
Niafcer
SMpMMg
llM
Nln.
Clock
Km
(?4-hr
Clock)
bi Heter
Reeding
Outlet
3
%o
//2l
,v?
J. Co
/' ^
1
3td
63
//3
9S
£ A
ZD
3
es
27
<977 ,i?
,sv
?3I
hi
A-7
3SY
L6
//V
^7
£/
X
4q
3}
°}&)*
t&>
lO
'•7
7/
//f>
L!
A
<*5
37
9xr£.l
,V7
/•£
/•(a
IT?
}jcf
Co
/•n?
Z
/(DO
9X8.1
/,?
/'?
//7
99
C°
/3
f
/OS
y?
4°
^7
/
no
£-2
QQ6.C>
fso
W
- r * **¦ ¦
/•7
/•?
/'*
/oi
C>o
/
;s
)
)>$
57
999. 7
,50
W
A 7
A7
f??'
~)2
6,r>
J
/Jo
i£01
/ooj.m
*33/
A*
/ c.
a 9
/ n 3
C,l
fx
'-fatJ
J<£"0
/L
\i
/A o
i3L\?>
toc&.M
A-L
US
19
I00L.°)4
n?
/y
/y
?7 '
LI
Jo/
9?
L
/y o
21
/*/*.ir
/•rs'
z^vs-
?U
7?
7
/o ^
/oQ
tr-L-
;
Ho
$1>
/d/7.1j
,17-
S2*
/y
/v
67
/o?-
/<>£>
/A
i
m
3*
/ollo-z.
,47
/.t
/.*
/a*!
A/
. tU
13
s
/5o
HI
»V*.
3S|
/.*
f-G>
irj
/<>3
*
/5^
ms
/DlV.tl
• 5o.
/.?
t'1
tso
*1
/>1
?y
f3
s
Ho
/01/.&Z
.50
??o
/•7
i
Ztf
7 2.
/^y
^3
/$
3
/ Sr^
1ST
/oso-ty
/W
i
271
1
61
/tf S"
93
Li?
/X
101AL
•
m
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
AVISAGI
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-------
PLANT
MIC
Si~U
g-3l-8S"
SAMPLING LOCATION O pV\ gA~
SAHPL£ UK
» g oy
Ms^y /<
OPERATOR
AMB1(NI TENPERAIURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE _
static pressw aratural*7/*C (Clrcla Ona)
Pwp
Vacuva
in. Hg
Prob*
Fllur
Rtclrc.
Wator
Abiortoant
Trap
Ory Cat Matar
laplngar
Exit
Inlat
Outlat
"¦ out^
Oadrad
Actual
Skin
Out
3
ISO
53
/t£h.<
%
lis
J*
/OSI.IS
AS
w
/•s
/.s
2.$"*
—
—
ts
JtO
is
iS'
12
/5ipo
33,
/okon-x
,M=f
IS
k*
—¦
?n
—
-—
/07^
13
z.
^0">
4*
/a6V.V6
531
/v
aV
—
ifsf
—
—
6 V
/<53
13
7
.3 10
/o in. *t 2_
331
/.V
/•V
—
-
¦—
70
/*fT
48
/d 7J.sc
, 31
w
A3
/.?>
—
?tf
—
tS
/O?
/£
*L
63
toiH.yi
/V
/.y
z
533
'•/
A/
—
7 hi
—
lob
(iQ
»
530
Ho3
f6 Iff. 05"
¦?3I
/ar
/or
—
—
LI
bS
n
1
335"
/*>HM
.33
33o
/•/
/./
—
PO
—
—
(><
/o^
91
is-
(/
l
3 HO
/oS7Jfc
.3!?
33o
—
Zi<*
—
—
LC,
n
y
J
t
V
/
-2-/0
333-1
/
/.Y5
ni
COMMENTS
/t.VUfS
-------
APPENDIX C.3
Ambient Run Sheets
C-25
-------
J
B
r^»nmvuiui .
$r**t~ 4.**
fTNIH
1DTQUIIM
axv
If
ii
PIMP
VACUUS.
k Ma
TUPUAIURC,
•f
*A&-Z.
mmtXM
lUrCRATURE.
f
6o°
IM.CT
(?¦„!.**
OUTUtT
O »o
3Z} .0*2.
wr^;vU
ocwco
ACTUAL
Am&&
S- IT. IS
31«i • Co 0
3^0
.%s
7H°
%3°
7^"
i-S
69*
¦ Q H.'^O
3^. 10
W2%
.>
f'SO
? s
l i'
60"
1S 1V.1S
"iT.4. %S
H i»
.SI
-7^0
*<*
?2.
3,£
Ii"
^O-
ni
VoS^lo
3T
.il
•)3#
9C,
3 J
Co-
HvC>
VJ?. 5
~S3
• &3
15
*<=>
g7
Y
C X
f&/t>
SSl.f
• r
go
V
5Y
IL 53
J?7
*?5
/«
73
S-S
6so L ^
V/
*%c*
7?
? ?
(a
£Y
srist
A-l<
-»"*
- ^
Jc.JL
01
to °J
6>*Z.4lZ.
~ **•
,Sr$
6 V
(aH
fa <
H^o
Ul
G
Z?
• • i/>. ^
• B*
1Y#-
m
/3.Vf
-?£<:.2C«
sc
¦K
lci
cry
6ft
V/
/
/*3* 1 419^76
7 sy"
H
7'
P25
s^e>
Wttvf*
y* V
Qh~*\
T*.>*
CMS Hit
-------
ORATION
xnus ft***
Z,
y y tf AM MM
Ow d- /^O on*ATM
c,U^ld he-
fl£L0 OATA
^ UJ **Jb D / /I.
imfio
TfcAt
raou length aho rm
mox/lc t.o 'A''
'' -to***
h$ i
UMtrmC LOCATION
iMfuim
\>it-
ry»vJv^
MWIT lUrtMlUtf
•AMactmc fttifwic
siAHcrRuwtf.ir>ti.
farcAHuaw«<*t
\
V,
a
O STftCi<
KNtMTICoriMy|«l MM
ASUJNCO HOCTUKt. %
UtfU BOH NUK8CR I
KTtM MX »tJM£H , £
*tm aw H.ql
C FACTOR -
H
A
IVOUI
r*oe£ mcater urrutc -
HEATER MX Itnt -
HFMMCt if i
METER * * .q AC-Z.
mmaut \
vunuMvn.
•f
(AM. M. nyui
MLET
(IbJ.**
OUTLET
rr.^f
to. H|
^
OCMEO
ACTUAL
A*6 -fc
s c r^s
3-Ht,. fTS
*1-
.s*
7-C
w
So"
*.a
6^*
uo*
/a ("S.'^o
25
HI*
. *?
-jyo
m
Sa
3-0
6o>
i** tVs*
2.5"! , fir>
Ml 0
. ss
,fe^
H 0
3.0
GS ®
LO*
fl< o_f
lie, lo
3V
¦V
7-3 •
In S
1 ©n
la
To"
Co'
*
t7ro
3^.f<
r*5
7*-
/•.as=»-
Si*
iYp
1/
VJitot
Jb-
m~
/V5o
qij.6*9
-
*0
7*
/ k.'VA
37
¦*
86
!
f-2-
3,
//!, ^
*7
->%'
?2-
i
r
n «
f Zo. Tl
m
i?5
- V
7?
?r
y
5-P
*rof
IA2S'
<-\o
V>
^?D
Ar-
Gt
JJL.sj
- ft
y*
^1l ^
*A 'c
rrMT
V,n */¦
A$
%H°
C><-
3
<2.
//Y*
¦*
Hi-
-------
APPENDIX C.4
HC1 Outlet Run Sheets
C-29
-------
I
FltlU DAI A
ruei-Slif—^L
CAM 5--3^ -%
c FAciM .c»b
O "2-
i-e**. C«»c« . o
F.VmuL£fctt 0|l<
PRORE HEATER SETTING.
_ NEATER MX SETT IMC.,
— REFERENCE A».
SCHEMATICOF TRAVERSE POMT LAYOUT METER r •^T^Hs*
RE AO AND RECORO ALL OtTA EV£R»_Zi2_ MURJTES
O
I
CO
TRAVERSE
POMT
MWIR
ft
\ cuaw
CAS METER READING
tfJ.R1
VELOCITY
NEAO
ttp^.^MjO
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
UN), m. Hj0l
STACK
TEMPERATURE
nt\.f
ORT CAS METER
TEMPERATURE
PUNP
VACUUi.
SAMPUROX
TEMPERATURE.
•F
HTMCER
TEMPERATURE,
f
INLET
(T.^-F
OUTLET
ta. Hf
o ——H5?>
DESNtED
ACTUAL
1
/k 1
7^S\4S.
.S3
l,V5
l-W
3Ht>
Ci
20 13
^ 1-
i.ir
/,3T
7
?o
0
8-d
in aj.
7 -?& 35 O
/.3JT
l."?T
^<1Q "
/o4
0
8Y
4A 33
^.cw
1 r ^
U
/C\
a
V? 1>
/.a
/•-z-
J/&
/o *2^
o
4o
fro 13
Sn'i 5"
«30
/ .-V
/n
/<>
a
<*0 33
.'V>
i^
3Hi
ns
/0^
a
<8-
loo «
\.2~
<¦¦2-
3?9
//-?
JoZ
r>
^25-7
l to
, 3?
i ?r
frt
3H)
fa*
o
sT
/
v
( J
)td
TS.llf
I.JiO
IbC
¦H*
comm
/6>oZYU
r»i Ama m
-------
radian
COIPORATIOM
fuwr
CATC
Si
FIELD DATA
¦ *
y-ss
Maraim ^.u
MMM 7. ^CY-
"»IH« UZtJO-^ f_C-
MMif fimUnitf
UMTKMOttt
itAitc nuuM.
V) • A
V5S. &3
So 13
firbfr.
. 37
/.yr
/vr
3M7
fo 1-
o
2S7
io «*>
.27
/¦Iff
/•V*
?T
3*-t o* T^sr
/
/
J
no
-7^
i-fi
liUHX.
<\n
.ifr"
1
am"t n. T.v9
-------
CO PC ATIO
FIELD DATA
-si -
.si
imtik LOCAi tempo
umjE lm _ tif-t
«W"M
MHJI TMrtJUTUtr -7t3
sAxoaenticntuKME _jL_5L^
STATIC fRtSHMC. o 7
¦UHITEi
o
I
CO
OJ
fKAVCMC
ram
MMM
"N. cLoai ik
"^XeSSi
1«.M X
WK1UHMM
MjOt
STACK
TEMPERATURE
1*.
/. 9
^?3c>
QH
/
D79
T&
L/o
v,7
'•?
/o(.
9o
/
O/P/
ni/
d> rs
*33- -2
/, 9
Vcs
/
J>7£>
^ no<;
.50
/.<*
/.?
/"
9*?
f
CJ=K
\
' ,,
-
V^.}7"5 "
33/, 33
71
. o% y
•
C *11
n.ist
-------
APPENDIX C.5
Sampling Train Recovery Sheets
C-35
-------
C Si
UiVf
S" t rt
-3.9-/V
PLANT
DATE _
SAMPLING LOCATION BtACnHQU-i c~ ouge'
SAMPLE TYPE HMf
SUN NUMBER
COMMENTS:
<3/ nc/~ /VA}^ fio-1
sample box number
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOIVENT RINSES
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER t
CONTAINER 0
O
i
Co
FINAL:
TARE:
NET.
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
ag
¦9
sg
¦a
Bfl
"9
BQ
M0
M9
MQ
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE ANO CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP & LABEL 1M4E0IATELY
IMP1NCER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER I
, al3 (17* J •3-'£-
TRAP
CONTAINER #4
NET GAIN
(See Impingar Results
Reverse Side)
H9
MO
H9
TOTAL
M9
NOTES/OBSERVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN 1HP1NGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saaple Code Ident.
Iapfnger No.
X"
Date
6~'o29-sr-
Solution Used
Amount of Solution (¦!)
Imp. Tip Configuration
2
/iPUL
/Oo. 7
3
AfPcC HrO
/ Of.
4
_
5
A C> f. 1
n
6
OJ
oo
7
/
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN OF IHPINGERS
(grams)
*QA SAMPLE FOR ORGANIC COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER *~
Samples for Further Analysis:
Saaple No. Description
Species
Final
InltlaT"^
Wt. galn-
Flnal
Initial-^
Wt. galn-
Flnal
Initial"
Wt. gain
Final
Initial"
Wt. gain
final
Initial"
Wt. gain
Final
Initial"
Wt. gain
Final
Initial
Wt. gain-
Weight (graas)
Aoon.9
(% 3.
47H
stxq . r
3 <4. f
41os
Vfa /
a
l^.o
t-3
At .7
Results (Total ag.)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT
OMt
5lT)/)] S - - Z
SMTLI 60* MMH
CLIAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES A alt*
PuAl
Xc.
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVE Ml MASH Of MOIZLE, PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER NOLOER
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER §
CONTAINER •
GRAVINETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: ag
TARE: ag
NET:
LABORATORY RESULTS
FINAL:
TARE: ,
NET:
¦»
•a
MO
Ml
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
MO
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AM CONOENSM
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (RAD-2) ,v
(NOTE): CAP 4 LABEL IWtfOIATELY
IMPINGED NO. 1 (QA)
CONTAINER §
TRAP
CONTAINER 14
i
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
SaopU Coda ldant.
lapingor Mo. Solution lUad Aaount of Solution («1)
1" —
HP L. C \4
x£-
IOIAL WE1GM1 GAIN Of iMPlNCtftS (gr«u)
/O/. C,
/oo y
oZoo. U
Date
r-3&-&V
lap. lip Configuration
/S^SCe.O
NJ» SAMPU foa MGANIC COLLECIION EffKIENCV - SAVE IN CONTAINfR H.
&aaplo» for further Aiulytii:
U^l* N*. Oatcriplion
Spacias
final
Initial-^
Mi. gain-
final
Initial^
Wt. gain-
final
InitiaT"^
Wt. gain"
final
Initial^
Wt. gain"
final
Initial-
Wt. gain
final
Initial"
Wt. gain
final
Initial"^
Wt. gain"
Woight (graai)
-rmi-
7 7 .-? 3
(ft -3
ii
tf
W ...
e- •?
&?o~ 1
ufl 3
3f.
IttulLi (Total *g.)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
plant ^ /~r>r
COMIENTS:
DATE
S -<3>~3Z~.
SAMPLING LOCATION Q^Tl«Tr
SAMPLE TYPE M MJS
¦UN MMER (Jib o 9 - Stf/to $ flo -3
SAMPLE BOX WWER
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES (ui?K>-J fAx Cjg-i
FRONT HALE - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLOER
CONTAINER «
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: ag
TARE: ag
NET: ma
LABORATORY RESULTS
MO
FILTER WMER
CONTAINER »
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
¦8
•g
MB
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
MB
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE ANO CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP I LABEL IMMEDIATELY
IMPINGER M. 1 (QA)
CONTAINER #
TRAP » f( ~ 7
CONTAINER M
O.g
*ET CAIM
(See lapingcr RetuHi
Reverie Side)
M#
MB
MO
TOTAL
Mfl
MOIE S/OBSERVAT IONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saapla Cod* Idant.
laptngtr No. Solution Utad
1" —
Date
s~~- 31 -fi
tfPtc. d7
rt-Pic.
Aaount of SoIuLIm (•!)
f QO.l
lap. Tip Configuration
final
Initial-^
Wt. gain'
final
i#uur
Wt. gain-
final
Initial-]]
Wt. gain-
ye-
final
Initial-^
Wt. gain
final
Initlar^
Wt. gain-
final
Initial"
Wt. gain-
IQTAi WUGHT CAIN Of INP1NG£BS (gra**) / 1^8.?
Final
InltlaT-[
Wt. galn-
•QA SMtfLt f0« OaOANlC COLLECTION tfflCltMCV - SAVE IN CONTAINER •«.
Saoplat for furthar AnalyiU:
Saapla No. Doicrlptlon
Might (oraai)
£}£> O f • °
at,*
zot-ti
TfiTT
mt
'3-^
7^,-7
SflMlK
Raiultt (Total ag.)
-------
PLANT S / 7~tT f^9
DATE 5" 9 - fr ±~~
SAMPLING LOCATION ~&A £<.t46 UStT O^rctT^
SAWLE TYPE /"/ CJL
run number rjc) - - SO /
SAMPLE 60X NUMBER
COHHtHlS:
CLEAN-UP PERSON j£^3*xH*
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGES RECOVERY SHEET
-c=»
Saaple Code Ident.
Irpinger No.
1*
iil- H!
Date
Solution Used
MiPH f>'N)
<
Amount of Solution (ml)
/O O. f
/O / . 3
Imp. Tip Configuration
abo.^
Final
lnltla
Wt, ga
Final
Inltla
Wt. ga
final
InttU
Wt. ga
Final
Inltla
Wt. ga
Final
Inltla
Wt. ga
Final
Inltla
Wt. ga
Final
InUla
Wt. ga
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN OF IMPINGERS (grams) f
*QA SAMPLE FOR ORGANIC COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER #4.
Saaple* for Further Analysis:
Sanple No. Description
Weight (grass)
.y
its • *,
40c u
gj.9.0
£/•/>
-------
0R6ANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT
OAK
6 / TTr ,0?
COM4ENTS:
S-30 -SS
SAMPLING LOCATION &/i6ct/Ou±£;~ Ou.r<-C~T~
SAMPLE TYPE A/ CX
MM MJMBER O 7~ /^CL ' ^
SAMPLE 601 NUMBER
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES
iOo-QH
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF N0Z2LE, PROBE. CVCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
CONTAINER 0
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: mq
TARE: mg
NET: >g
LABORATORY RESULTS
MO
-p»
ui
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER f
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
¦0
¦0
¦o
M9
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
•0
MO
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AND CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAO-2)
(NOIE): CAP A LABEL IMMEDIATELY
I WINGER NO. 1 (QA)
CONTAINER f
TRAP *
CONTAINER 04
NET GAIN
(See laplnger Results
Reverse Side)
MO
MO
MO
TOTAL
M9
N01ES/0BSERVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMP1NGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saapla Cod. Ident. Q ' U Qjt. - Ct>1-
o«u
•r-3o i
laplnger No. Solution Used
1" Nfq
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT # 9
OAK '3
COWCNTS:
SAMPLING LOCATION c Oy.ri.iSr
VAWLE TYPE M
RUN MMER ^3 Q 9 - tiC A ^ 3
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN-UP
PERSON
SOLVE HI RINSES NH
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVtin HASH OF NOIILE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BVPASS).
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER '
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: mg
TARE: ag
NET: ag
LABORATORY RESULTS
pg
CONTAINER f
FINAL:
TARE: .
NET:
•»
¦fl
¦g
MO
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
•9
V9
ORGANIC-yAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AMD CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP 4 LABEL IMMEDIATELY
IWINCER M l (QA)
CONTAINER f
TRAP t
CONTAINER M
NET CAIN
(Set laplnger RctulU
Reverse Side)
MO
M
MB
TOTAL
MO
NOTES/OBSERVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saaplo Coda Idant. (tfi- 03
Uptngar Me.
1"
Data
Solution Utad
ivfojoH
(Lt>-
ijjX
10IA1 WEIGHT GAIN Of IHPlNGEftS (groat)
Aaount of Solution (•))
/oi.o
lap. lip Configuration
/Ohb
ao* 1
*4)A &M»li FOA ORGANIC COLLECT 10* EFHCIEMCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER 14.
Stoplit for FurUtor AiwalysU:
Soapl* No. Datcrlption
Sptclit
final
Initial"^
Wt. gain'
Final
InttlaT"
Wt. gain
Final
InttlaT"
Wt. gain
Final
Initial-^
Ut. gain
Final
Initial"^
Ut. gain"
Final
initial"^
Wt. gatn"
Ftnal
Initial-^
Wt. ga 1 n~
Might (graat)
** 3^
ijfcf:
V/6..0
ft if
v-tr.o
433'.?
a1 A (
Ratult* (Total ag.)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT
Mil
£ jtA+tf-
SOLVENT RINSES ,
FRONT HALE - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT MASH OF NOIZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER •
CONTAINER §
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
LABORATORY RESULTS
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
¦g
•g
¦«
MO
pg
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AND CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAD-2)
(NOTE): CAP I LABEL llftEOlATELY
IHP INGER NO.\ (qA)
CONTAINER •
TRAP i /f test !) -(JSS 3) -
* a~r C37?*>
-L,.r
COUTAIMER *4
NET GAIN ¦
(See liplnger RetuTti
Reverse Side)
TOTAL
MO
MO
»g
f9
NOIES/OBSERVATIONS:
«vi b fyir-o^oM. -*Vr) ^
Jkf>C- /Vu^-jv. o? O /TVT--C-1*-
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
Staple Cod* I dent. <0?- MMS - ax- &
lapinQtr No. Solution lliid
1* —
Date
c
_£$L
Aaounl of Solution (•!)
lap. lip Configuration
2
H7o
/ o3.r
3
H2ti
, 0 <3. s
final
lnltlaT"^
Wt. gain'
Final
fnltlaF
Wt. gain
Final
lnlttaT-^
Wt. gain"
jOQ A
Final
Initial^
Wt. gain
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain
Final
Initial^
Wt. gain"
/o9v .1
/
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN OF IKPIHGtRS (graat)
•QA SAHPLE FOR ORGANIC COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINED #4.
Samlet for Further Analytic
Saapla Mo. Description
Weight (graas)
/ •70\S.V
ross;o
C32 . (
etff-C
-C3W>
MA
-? o. C >
jEL22~
.17, I
±
3 if
WT
«/O.Q
Sp
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PUNT 5 / 7*1-" 0 ^ COtMENTS:
GATE SO
SAMPLING LOCATION B/jCtHCuicf JC
i
<_n
TARE: mg
NET: ag MO
FILTER NUMBER CONTAINER # FINAL: ag
. TARE: mg
NET: ag |ifl
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
MQ
OWGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE ANO CONOENSEft
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (KAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP 1 LABEL I MEDIATELY
IMPINCER NO.I (QA)
CONTAINER «
TRAP *r3Q ~ C3V7. Q
CONTAINER #4
Id-
1,11 CA,N
(S« laplngcr Retullt
Revtrse Side)
MO
MS
TOTAL
Mfl
NOUS/OB St RVA1 IONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saapl* Coda Idant. M ~ Q JL — (J&1—
lapingar Mo. Solution Uted Amount of Solution (al)
Date
o
cn
ro
ttpLQ.
HPi-e
\-*T jO
sX
lap. lip Configuration
l&°. 1
f&i .?
A o°. &
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN Of lHPlNUU (graft*) ! 13.0.°
y
*4A SM»t£ FOB OftGANlC COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER •«.
iMpItt for fiirUnr Aiulyiti;
Saapla No. Oatcription
Spaciil
--3o
'6r
Final
Initial
Wt. gain
Final
Initial-
Wt. gain
Final
Initial"^
Wt. gain-
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain-
Final
Initial
Wt. gain-
Flnal
Ini tiaT~3
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial"^
Wt. gain
Weight (graas)
/7ST.V
6W-*.
/Q*y/ - O
la 2 J
~ an
±
kl£jJk-
132-
/ ¦
fpj
JA£j.
IjL
•7
Ratultt (Total ag.)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLwn
DATE iT • 3 I 8 f
COHCKTS:
SAMPLING LOCATION '
SAMPLE TYPE M >-i
SUN NUMBER
43 a 9 'MMS-Sr-
->
o
SAMPLE BOX NLMCR
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT HASH Of N0Z2LE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
CONTAINER #
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FIHAl: ag
TARE. ag
NET: mg
LABORATORY RESULTS
VQ
FILTER NUMBER
0
1
cn
CO
CONTAINER I
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
•0
•)
•8
M0
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
M
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE ANO CONOENSEft
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (MAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP A LABEL IIMfOMTElV
IMPINGES NO 1 (QA)
CONTAINER «
irap f 3o f> ""
CONTAINER M
NET GAIN
(Set l«pingtr Result*
Reverse Side)
Mfl
MS
MQ
TOTAL
W
NOI(S/OBSi RVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
SaapU Cod* Idant. fa- NMf-&r- 03
laplngar Mo. Solution Uttd Aaount of Solution (al)
1»
Date
en
4=.
hi Pi~ C (4^0
htpLt l-i?d
cyJL
lap. lip Configuration
/ OO . 3
/OQ> /
AVO.T
573 ¦»
•z-f 4. a >
JSt SC.
¥fsz 1
Vsi\
3S
7^3,3.
js;
liiultt (Total ag.)
-------
PLAKT ^ I T~tT~
OAT£ S" 9 -8 S"
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE ~A
BUN NUMBER C) *7 ~ /? A1 B " //?
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN-UP PERSON
ILL O-iv.
SOLVENT RINSES
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
iic ng
COMMENTS:
CONTAINER *
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER «
o
i
cn
on
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AND CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (XAD-2)
(NOTE): CAP & LABEL IM4E0IATELY
IKPINCER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER <
TRAP » (
CONTAINER #4
NOTES/OBSERVATIONS:
ECO itEET
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: ag
TARE: ag
NET: ag
FINAL: ag
TARE: ofl
NET: «g
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL eg
/3(.0.7) r
LABORATORY RESULTS
MO
HQ
HO
Mfl
H9
NET GAIN
(See Iopfnger Results
Reverse Side)
M9
TOTAL h9
-------
CK
etA ^
r Q
cn
cn
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IHP1NGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saaple Code Jdent
I«pinger No.
c\~ A M6- A
Solution Used
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN OF 1MPINGERS
Amount of Solution (¦))
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT
DATE
COM4EHTS:
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE /fr H fr I tT /O 7" - S
mm numer
Cc) - /? /V ft / J; a)¥ ~ /£
SAMPLE Ml NUMBER
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES
FRONT HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF N02ZLE, PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
CONTAINER •
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL; ag
TARE: ag
NET: ag
LABORATORY RESULTS
M8
0
1
Ul
¦vj
FILTER MUWER
CONTAINER •
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
•g
¦g
MO
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
MO
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE ANO CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (MAO-2)
(NOTE): CAP 1 LABEL I MEDIATELY
IMPINGER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER 0
TRAP *31 C ) ~ Cl&'f )
CONTAINER «4
NET GAIN
(See leplnger Result*
Rewerte SI da)
MB
MO
MS
TOTAL
M9
NOTES/OBSERVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
0
1
ci- (\ H iZ I * - Q
Oate
k^sl
_c^L.
TO ML WEIGHT GAIN OF INPINGERS (graas)
Aaount of Solution (•))
tSa t. 7
2osX
lap. Tip Configuration
/
*QA SAMPLE FOR ORGANIC COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER #«.
Saapltt for Further Analysis:
Saapla No. Description
Specie*
Final
Initial-]]
Wt. gain'
Final
Initial-]]
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial-]]
Wt. gain-
Final
Initial-^
Wt. galn"
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain-
Final
Initial-]]
Wt. galp
Final
Initial-]]
Wt. gain
Weight (graas)
m
73o,7
<"tA ¦'
Ms. if
Results (total »g)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
run $ rrt 69
OA It - &C
COMttNTS:
SAW LING L OCA I ION th>^CL
SAMPLE TYPE
mm numbe> n^-fhmS- gi- fBL
SANPLE Ml NUMBER
CLEAN-Uf PERSON
tY-
SOLVENT rinses Adtln^ /A^-de-,
FROM HALF - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVEMI MASH OF MIZIE. PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLAS*. FRONT HALF Of F111E* HOLDER
CONTAINER t
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
FINAL: bo
TARE: mg
NET: *g
LABORATORY RESULTS
MS
F1LTM
CONTAINER §
FINAL:
TARE: _
NET:
•0
•0
•g
MO
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
MO
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AND CONKNSC*
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (KAD-2)
(NOTE): CAP * UBEl INMEOIATELV
INPINCER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER t
TRAP
• A? Csrr.Q -(3/7-Q -
CONTAINER #4
Mfl
NET GAIN
(See laplnger Results
Reverse Side)
_ MO
_ M9
TOTAL
M0
NOIES/OBStRVAT IONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
Saopla Co4a Jdant. _ 04- HHP
lapfngar Me. Solution lH«d Aacunt of Solution (¦!)
!¦
Data
jr-±o-t <"
lap. lip Configuration
PL C.
H , x>
fOOi
/&<. o
I ot>
A
VtUMClGHT CAIN 0# UtflMKBS (grut)
0.3
JfttWMPU ft* M&AN1C COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - SAVE IN CONTAINER f4.
SMflit for FurUtar Analyalt:
Uapla He. Oa*crtptlon
Spidu
riMi
Initial^
Wl. {iin
flul
Initial-^
Wt. gain
Final
InlttaT-^
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial"^
Wt. gain"
Final
lnltiaT^
Wt. gain"
FImI
hitur
Wt. gain-
Final
Initial"^
Wl. gain"
Walght (graat)
GSi.&
4*7-7
&rt.°
jSTL
5E
U3M. 7
_yy£_3
yy-fv
ZZlL
*17/
-i(a¦ »->
liiulU (Total ag.)
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLAIT? S/Tb. &?
OATE S~ - 3.P -bf
COMSIfTS:
SAMPLING LOCATION LIT T
SAMPLE TYPE
RIM NUMBER f\GU± A rJ |< fVfll }
SAMPLE Ml MMER
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES
/nr.
fkOtfl HALF - PARI ICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH Of N01ILC, PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK. FROM! HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER 0
FINAL:
TARE:
NET:
¦0
ag
MO
0
1
CT1
FILTER MMER
CONTAINER 0
FINAL:
TARf:
NET:
•0
•0
•0
Mfl
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
•0
PS
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AM) CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (IAO-2)
(NOIE): CAP A UBEL IMMEDIATELY
IMPINGER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER 0
TRAP 0
CONTAINER 04
NET GAIN
(Set laplnger HciulLt
Revtrte Std«)
t>0
Mfl
Mfl
TOTAL
MO
NOItS/OBSf RVATIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
i >f l» Cod* ldanl. _ fa- MdJL - P&L.
lapingar Mo. Solution Ufctd Aaount of Solution (•!)
i" C.I AJ) /Of. /
Oata
5' -
I
ro
lOIAi tflGMI GAIN Of INHMGUS (flruu)
lap. Tip'Confiflurtlton
! O t. $
a Q}. 7
S**U foa ORGANIC COLIiCIION ffFIClfNCV - SAV£ IN CONIA1NM #4.
SmpIm far FurUtar Analytit:
Sa«pla No. batcriptlon
SpKlit
f inal
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Ftnal
Initur
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial""^
Wt. galiT
Final
Initial^
Wt. gain
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Weight
-------
ORGAN IC SAMPLING TRAIN RECOVERY SHEET
PLANT \ TC~ £1
o*it fT - So-I'f
• t
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE MfiT
CUM MUM II
OMCNTS:
OcJ - /"/>? < - tio F6/L
SAHPLE BOI NUHBEB
CLEAN-UP PERSON
SOLVENT RINSES A J
fMin HA If - PARTICULATE PHASE
SOLVENT WASH OF N0I2LE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLOER
CONTAINER i
GRAVIMETRIC RESULTS
LABORATORY RESULTS
FINAL:
TARE: .
Nil:
•fl
•fl
¦0
V9
FILTER NUMER
en
u>
CONTAINER *
FINAL:
TARE.
NET:
•0
•0
¦g
t>9
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
V9
ORGANIC-VAPOR PHASE
TRANSFER LINE AND CONDENSER
(SOLVENT RINSE)
RESIN TRAP (IAD-2)
(HOIE): CAP I LABEL IWEOIATELV
IMPINGER NO.1 (QA)
CONTAINER f
TRAP t at % (3^/ 7^
CONTAINER 04
NET GAIN
(See laplnger Remits
Reverse Side)
MO
Mfl
M
TOTAL
HO
N0IES/06SERVAIIONS:
-------
ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN IHPINGER RECOVERY SHEET
FRl.
iMpIt Codo Idant. Ro- _
Lapingar No. Solution Uud Aaount of Solution (¦!)
1"
ft
rlfuo
TOTAL WEIGHT GAIN OF 1W>IHC£BS (graat)
< 00, v-
/ Ot. V
£2.
¦QA SAW Li fOB ORGANIC COLLECTION EfflCltNCV - SAVE IN CONTAINER «4.
SMpUi for furthar Anilytit:
Saapla No. Oatcription
Data
r-^o
lap. lip Configuration
Spaclas
final
Initial-^
VI. gatn-
Final
Initial"
Ut. (till
final
InitlaT^
Wt. flaln
fin* I
Initial"^
Wt. gain
final
lnitlaT~[
Ut. gain"
final
Initial-^
Wt. gain"
Final
Initial-^
Wt. gain'
Walght (graM)
_ yJit.
r%°- ?
~^X7~
7
m
—a -
7 7 2-
m
lamltt (Total ag.)
-------
APPENDIX C.6
Preliminary Traverse Point Location
Traverse and Nomograph Data Sheets
C-65
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PI AWT
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT
S'l-g
DATE 5 - ^
SAMPLING LOCATION
Ax)\ 1<2 V C
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in.
&H@
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE (AMBIENT+ 20°F),aF
)oS°F
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
Bwo
35%
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in. H(
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. H|
(Pm±0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
Ps
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
PS/P.
l.o
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, °F
Ts
avt
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD, in. HjO
Apa*f.
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD, in. H20
APmax.
.1*
C FACTOR
. 5 %
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
*/>b
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
.?of
REFERENCE Ap, in. HzO
. 6 2.
EPA (Our) 234
4/72
C-68
-------
RADIAN
CORMRATIOM
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLAT Q°l
OATE I B--C-*
wrtiwLOCATION
insice of far «all to u ..
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. INSTANCE A) S4 \t,
II01DE OF MEM UU TO _ u .
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. IDBTMCE Bl _J
'.TACK IJ>.. (DISTANCE A • DISTANCE B> *-1 It-"
NEAREST UPSTREJUIOBTURSANCC fffa" (£*'}
NEAREST D01NSIREAI DISTURBANCE fl*" .1 ' )
CALCULATOR JjtU&id SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
FRACTION
OF STACK 10.
STACK 1.0.
PROOUCTOF
COLUMS 2 AM) 1
(TO NEAREST 1 1 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM 0UTS10E OF NIPPLE
(SI* OF COLUMNS 4 t Si
A - i
.OS H
Mas
1 "
u
2
.m
Hi. 5 "
rj"
3
.asu
m .S"
H.
1"
a*.o
17. S"
-K3.HH
T
HO.tlx.
<
. f
47.5"
id.
nM
n.l*
A
4 rv/
n"
S3 '/a
|
i
i
EPA (Don 2X2
4/7?
C-69
-------
?IANT SAc
DATE
ol
LOCATION Oc)-V\ c \
STACK in HT/i"
RAD AN
CORPORATION
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Ht 'p.Q.SL ^
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H-n ^5" H, O
DPFRATORS^Syv^C i^
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
VELOCITY
HEAO
?
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT Sv~tL
DATE _
sUilse
SAMPLING LOCATION
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in.
1.75-
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE (AMBIENT + 20 °F),°F
^"avi.
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
^0
33
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in. Hg
*1,3
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. H|
(Pm±0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
ps
'U
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
P'/P
/rm
1
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, °F
Tsa*|.
TttG
noo
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD, in. HjO
O.(*o
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD, in. HjO
A|,flax.
o.7<
C FACTOR
0.5?
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3/e
'•?{>*? 0. 371
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in. . J '
03CG
REFERENCE Ap, in. H20
0^1
EPA (Dur) 234
4/72
-------
JiTE q
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS —
F/cu-
PLANT
DATE ^
mmpi ink i n^.ATinw' Triig.T
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIOE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE A> S\>
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO ,
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE B) q '
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A • DISTANCE
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE ~ -V'
j 2^-% Bp
fw/rtFUWc t
Fr
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR
(< rr
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
STACK I.D.
PROOUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
1
Su.P ^
<4 3"
/t.o.3
ior
¦x
1
II.8"
3
\\.2>
>. i
4
H- I"
4-
*3
l.L
T
C
IG.O
II
43.1
^o. 1
aq i
} 2.
W3-
M 2.
•><
1
1 C-72
EPA (Dur) 232
4/72
-------
RAD AN
CORPORATION
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT SitLO^
OATE \B<
LOCATION
STACK 1.0 SCll
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. H| 3?>36>
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. «20
OPERATORS SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps). in.HjO
STACK
TEMPERATURE
. -F(^
Ai
0. ocp
A-2
n.^Cp
-fesao,s
-3
o.q-q
o, sT
1 (e04
-S
o.io
lt,T |
-L>
o,m
IC.&)
-7
0,1 c
1711
-6
o.to
\beto
'ID
0, Co3
Its4
- 11
O, S
\~lo8
M7
IU1D
AVERAGE
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
VELOCITY
HEAO
(Apj), in.f^O
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(T ). »F
AVERAGE
EPA (Our) 233
4/72
C-73
-------
APPENDIX D
Meter Calibrations
-------
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA
(English Units)
Date 3)jq/ fT
Meter Box #
Pretest 0 Post Test Q
V- (3bu\r
Barometric Pressure, Bp ¦ .?^,7v ; ?Q-0!°
Dry Gas Meter #
aanoattcr
Mttlif,
tf.
la. NjO
IhraBtor Ntian
Of Mat Tait Naur
AMI
Cat vol not
¦ttar
ft3
Cat voluo*
dry ?as
¦•tor
V«I
ft3
Tt«p«r»turt
Tiw
I.
Mo.
.00
t
•ffnw
Dry gat actcr
At tar
{"•'
F
Inlet
\*v
f
Out)at
*do*
®r*
Average
5d*
F
s
.3
Y^CO
7.1o3
?3.s7
Uli
¦V
/:9 V
J,)
n.m
ot9.CS £
pS'. ni
Qf. 1?) 1
?.3g * s^s - / J
.03/7X .3"
03'7
'£-.^5x/gy«r
/ S3£Jr_/£^:\ 2
( ?.
-------
DRY ttt KETEA CALIBRATION DATA
(Engl 1th Units) Prtttst Q Post T«t Q
D«tt
Hettr Box I
Units
__i2
Btronetrlc Prtssurt, Bp • J>*7. C 7
Dry Sli HeUr # J-
Ortftc*
¦tnoatUr
MttlBI,
I*. H|0
ftWWUr Nll«
•r »t T«»t »tor
4i
Ui nlw
wt test
¦Bltf
V
n1
*.
Mt.
.00
iK9
Ui tilw
In Ml
Hit tMt
Orj fit Mttr
¦iter
'-i
fr
III tor
*
Inlot
*
Ovtlot
•t
Avtrtft
*
,?s
• Y9
3^. ViS
<^.6X0
70>OVU
>«??
7v;?7
??
?/
7?
,c\
*
,Ss
,yj/
&.(/n3
•po ovo
76,7Y
•?<,>/
sv
?/
7*
iC'
V
,ss
¦ vv
SS. vtt
W.335
7^ TV
7-7.75
ec*
Ay
w
V
V
A*
y
ho on
0-J11T m f«w ~ 4W >1 *
fc (ti ~ ttcjl fd J
Jf S3£».-S C/a _
S3v3y' "
7.77^J(^,^/ 5V/
*,0/*.?4.73*S3S.S*1™"- /.OC7Y
\
AOOVQ
l
i
1 • fatt* #f »f »l t«t atUr t> #ry t>lt Htor. TtUrMC* • tO.OJ.
4MI • Ortft« >r»jiwrt tflfftrmttti ttet |1w 0.71 cf* tf #1r »t j/r Wri tl.tt
lactai »f MitMr/a to. I,*. W«rv*» • t*.U.
Hit t»it tBltranc* Kit It i 0.08 vA vftM*
• nap »f 0.10
P»t«r OU 0*d Frwt ^ Hd ^
' ; C«1tfcr»tlR| UctAlclW
Wt»t UU 0»c*
IlKtllul Pud
ftMrfcs
D-2
-------
[£ i o)> ft/ ^ Pr*Y?sV~ BOX# g
rKOMETRlC PRESSURE Pb «S9^f . 1n. Hg DRY GASMETER I
RADIAN
CORPORATION
, Jrifice
Manometer
ettUng
H
; 'In. H20)
Gas
Volume
Uet Test
Meter v
(ft3)
Gas
Volume
Dry Gas
Meter V^
(ft3)
Temperature
Time
e
(min.)
Y
Am
Wet Test
Meter
W 4 ^
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet
Td (of)
Outlet
Tdo <°F>
Average
Td (OF)
I 0.5
57,
77
trt
&
Q 3
si
/2.M
oCl^i
i ¦ Vc
I 1"°
yf.cm
11
r,?
42
fd
z<~
&
//.O.S'
•99 }>i
l - S 9
2.0
/o
?Y. 5*4 2.
11
2V
rV-
9o
>3. a*?
7 /
1.
1 4.0
7 S, OS'S
fa
fcO
/C £59
11
/OX
/O?
9/
<73
y
- 99/9
z. w
8.0
1
/Ofoc 3
46,2. S~+-
w-.ks
11
?'0
/ js3? x 'lit \s -
f()
-/•-•> ^ £j±x
w t- J O . ) j.^4
4.0
0.294
-« ST? _
/D.ZfifA 3«S.D*S3"> -
s/x.oiit (srs? <9.sr]a- -
Mzgxxr') ( / ^-00
6.0
0.431
X x S3'J
i63~> ~
JMWxrsfiS ( / ^,CV
o
•
CO
0.588
/f.ce?i J«.if?Yl51rP
/£,<>££,/( 3©.*Sx S37 ~ ,
^>,03/? ls3~)x^i-2 "ys..
^9.f5jr^60 V / .2.0/
D-3
-------
DRY 6AS METER CALIBRATION DATA
Dfttc
Mettr Box I
(English Units)
chil?s
Pretest Q Post Test 0
Itronetnc Pressure, Bp • C,7
Dry fits Mettr I
OHfk*
mnemttr
Mttlaf*
1a. y
Nlinfl
Of m T«»t IHUr
* W
fat nltm
Mt Ult
Mtir
Ti^iritirv
Tt«
f.
m».
-i".
t
1
M
di nlM
ry.|»» Mttr
Htor
ft1
Ik tor
V
liiUt
*"
OvtUt
v
•r
Ann|t
*
.
i'9
$
*
.ts
>¥/ivLe - -. _
CjO-?x2%ll«S2+.8rx-W1- ,9mtwrt <1ff»r*tit1»1 VX |1m 0.71 cfi »f »1r »t Tift mt tt.K
facftai «f mrtvnr, 1b. m^o. Toliruca • 16.U.
*wt toit toltnoci mi* S i 0.05 «nd
• rtift ti 0.10
fctor iMk 0«cl Freftt *^lecfc /(?,
.. . Ullkntlai UdwIclM l/&
Mtot Uak Owck _ f / '
flKtrlul Qwck
-------
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA
(English Units)
Date
Meter Box # Cp
Pretest^JQ Post Test ~
So**-
Barometric Pressure, Bp »
Dry Gas Meter #
"b6M
Nanoaatar Nliirt
Of wn Ta»t Natar
eft tfft
Taapcraturt
Ortflct
Cat »ol«
dry All
kt te»t
0f7 «it «e
t*r
wotttr
littti),
AH.
la. NjO
MUr
V.J
ft3
Mttr
ft3
fktcr
•V
Inlet
*•
Outlot
*do*
or-
Average
$-•
F
Tine
1,
Ma.
.00
T
tH9
0,33
oi/tesi
(,.8(3
11.113
l(o. 800
72,7/
72,71
es
?o
7,5
78
63
MMl
/<5"6
1
O.fg
S.\9H
18,280
76.1^
68 .GdO
73,72.
73,72,
<10
'os-
78
8T-
6S
17.58
o.tis;
z
o,6a
1 *5.152-
26 .^35
e°l.085"
^.588
73/JZ
13,1Z
U
T
AHP
y
&HC.8
t.<*5
3.PC7 1*9- e t> + o.^/l3, {p
5
•W7)ra.0,7Tp
"L «+• SI I J
h.BIi
= /,SB
ID.I56
Q/<3
>0.503(39. 86 +
/0./-73 fa ~ 0-63/13.0.
<1. 86qV a?; 6 6 - (. a/13. Q>
lo .3i^JA1.6£,+3//3
q.03 n IQ
Rnir^T , us
o.oan (al
*167)*o.qqW
o.o^n (3}
tt.KoLSS6)l
"53V(ia-7iTp~
to.n**> J
-= 1,73-
533. ( lo oo
%S8o
(p C»
* • tatlo of accuracy of wat test atir to try tut nt«r. Tol«r»nca ¦ tO.D).
itm • Orlffca prnturt difftmtUI that !<»•« 0.75 efta of afr at 70°T and tt.K
1 achat of atrairy, i«. K^O. Tolaranca • afl.lS.
tatt tut tolaranca wit ba within i 0.05 and within
a raaga of 0.10
Hi tar Laak 0»ck Frwt _____ Baci
Calibrating technician
Mtet loak Cfcack
Electrical Chack
0-5
-------
MY tu KTtt CN.!tMTlM DATA
(EftjHlh Unit*) frttMt ~ Poit T*»t (3
D*tf
Ketir Eox I
rJ)Dsr
—ia
Pmsurt, Ip » rD^Xo
Dry 6** HeUr I &
OHftca
wnoxUr
MttlBf*
1®. H|0
*5
£5"
U» Ntwi
Of Mil TMt MUr
AM
,49
j^Z
lu ntn*
Mtir
n*
SB.S73.
9/.7?3
?V<7/3
7 QO.OSI
Sit nhm
tnriu
¦Ur
&
9-7.
fOliUI
/M-S9V
u5,nz
Twp»r>t»f>
*Ur
%•
73,53
2121
73,73
I-7V, 73
7^'S
Ha.3
9rj ftt Ulif
Wot
!«•
£7
il
3?
Z£l
4-L
Ovtltt
V
•r
"55-
99
*(=,
5°
Aiirtgt
*
11a*
#.
tla.
.5X
0-PW i*
k (u « 4ttj
'¦hi o «M f| 1
. * J
| 5". *s-^r. r
£f/?*-29.*6AS3a /OCPl*
"1
1 i.067*MX? i-rrn
fiXi ****** 3J1V'W7 '
S.^0^Jxti457> S S"» ^ cKcfr'-)-
S-.V^V **LU.rSS3X*'n* J- /.OO*^
1 • t»tf» »f ictmty #f Mt tMt »Ur to try tut »Ur. TtllrtW* • tO.Ol.
«H0 • Orlflo prtiivrt *1ff«rwit1a1 ttat |fm 0.71 cffc •/ air at W*T wrf 29.R
factal #f Hrorjr, la. «j0. Talanac* • a6.lt.
*wt tost t»T«r«ne( Kit to vttMa < 0.08 W vttMa
• nap tt 0.10
NaUr U«k 0*ci Frwtt
« 1
MW Uak Otk
Htctrtul Ctocft
tmrka
Ca11br*t1n| toctaUlaa
4**—
D-6
-------
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA
(English Units) Pretest Post Test Q
o»t« *>H/rs
Meter Box 4 "7
Barometric Pressure, Bp * ,30.0 Q
Dry Gas Meter #
OHflct
mnoatttr
toUIag.
AH.
'••v.
Mneaater Protturo
Of mt Tatt Nttor
*Nf
^G»rr,
(u wlim
Mtir
fr
&S-A\ Tt«p«r»turt
Tfac
I,
Ma.
.00
AHf
Cai voluae
dry (it
. Ih7 |it aettr
Mtir
ft5
IkUr
•Y
Inltt
*
OwtUt
tdo*
•r
liiinjt
>•
#P
.r
.,3"
V/- 7S^
y?.&ts
S'7-W
7 /
7^75
77 75
%
2/.ct .fir) (u ~ w)
0^317 i* * 460 «
<*(/> T2,3C
¦C^l^rr 6. f *. 9W
*7Y 3o.i?x rss.g
5 35. t'y /T,/? la.
A
/. i?/
V * totle of accurtcjr of *t test aUr to try tut Mtir. Toltrawa • tO.Ol.
«H» • OHflct prtttur* d1ffaro«t1a) th»t |1m 0.7J dk of atr at Ttftr and ».«
lacftai of mwny, la. NjO. Totarvc* • <0.1S.
Pott t»«t to1«r«nc« Hit U tritMa i 0.05 and vltlila
• raagt of 0.10
^ Jy
«». u..c~> v p
-------
MY 6A$ METER CALIBRATION DATA
(EnjlUh Units) Frtteit Q Port Test 0
Oftt*
Mettr Box I
c/ix/gs
7
Btraetrlc Prtsiurt» Bp • £9,
51,713
70JOC.
7<7.C> *?1
7 J, 7
??
/O^' frCJ
//9,SV3
qi&\
/0/.4 / 3
7^ /V
X&S9V S13.S " A021&
]2aZsM.Zv*5¥Z-& v/ftCri -
CicSci—
tittu&svxm * /out
1
1
* • titt* »f %mr%ty »f Mt tHt mUr t» try t»lt HUr. • <0.01.
4>9 • OHflc* prtuurt ftfftrtntlil tftat |1m 0.7* rta *f *1r it 70*T tfrf ».«
tactas «f mra/rj, 1i. HjO. ftUruca • tO.ll.
*wt tiit telaranci wit It wfOrft i 0.0S vtf «rftM«
• f»»9» »f 0.10
fct*r Ink Pwci ffWt hd
Ht»t Luk Omtk
Cltctrtul Omck
t—iU
D-8
Ct11kr*t1fl| tactaUItt
-------
DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION DATA
(English Units) Pretest ^ Post Test Q
/ \jz.,w7
Date >"3/7 V/ ^P-T*" Barometric Pressure, Bp •
Meter Box # *9 Dry Gas Meter #
nneneter
MttlBf,
fa. NjO
fcxSAt
Kiiwaotor Protsuro
Of Mil »ill Motor
AW
JXa/^
fiat vol«*
wrt UU
¦tir
ft3
5^^ Twpenturr
Ttw
I,
Mo.
.00
T
fits KOluae
-«ry-«»s.
Mtcr
ft5
Me* tut
D17 911 aeter
Utter
V
InHt
\f
Outltt
J*>-'
#r
Kttrigt
I6'
F
. r
,3
8$;?2)
7
/y_ &ol
2^-Qy 3
"2,?/
79
7f
13.17,
O.^lf
l.fi?
/,D
.Y3
Go . 42 3
/*o.(c28
^3.2/k
33,6
2} 7/
73,^2
/&
~?S
&o
16.54
f.0627
/.«?
.7S"~~
C-X* 9
/C,?3et
3 2.C.C, /
IX
JO(o
/oiO
*6
8V
13^0
LMO«
I.&S
3.a
/'O
>/.S 1°
2o,(
3
S3, c/3^
lip^L
n ii
//s
./31
€V
t 7
9.50
f.WTS'
1. 16
AH@
1,002*1
/.87
0-033.7 iH fe. « 4MjPl| *
(td ~ 46o)£ *
r/J/fe "..77/-y
/o,oos~ *y s yf
^ t.CC'U. "?
^ r. * . . i— c- -S <-
O.OilKo.S) ps3l.s~)( 13*27'
31.1.7fS3^ 11 5.116
XT
I-SH
,c^6 7 _
9/> 7
7o-.~*'? S~3^S"~ ~/,O/0 0
' s*^/* JO. 6 X-Tfc 5 v<=>cn
o^ULU^ f(53a X isj%
3**.fa7('s'/S7 L I o.opg
- /.8<7
~ I,Qq-?^
0.0317 C3.0'? [~£35?.5-^3>Qp'>'|
aw(S57.;M. 3.370 )
0O3I7 (3'0)f5«.5 C9.50)
~/.&5
w-uirsosiL fl.m
- l-U
T • *»tlo of lecuncjr of Mt Ult »Ur to dry Ult Mtir. Toltrinet • *0.01.
*H» • Orifice prtiiurt dlfforontlll tfut g1y«t 0.7J eta of llr it 70°r and W.W
l»cM» of Hrotry. In. HjO. Toliranco • tO.lS.
Pott t»»t t»lir»ne# wit bo wltMo i 0.0S «nd within
• rongo of 0.10
Hotor Look Owck Frwt ^ lock' '
Calibrating Uchnlclin
Mtot look Chock
Cloctrlul Chock
laarit
D-9
-------
tett
Meter Box I
MY CAS HETtt CALltRATlON DATA
(tngllth Units) frtUsl Q Pott T«t {J}
o = .^r?
tarooetrlc frtssurt* Ip ¦
^ Ory $4$ Keter # ?
(Jtll£S.
Orlflct
%K»Ur fm»W1
yum »tor
*M b£frv
tttnlw
••ttr
M
n1
bGm Tt«cxratsr«
ttto
I.
ft*.
.Ǥ
y
\
V
AW
(41 HlM
flnr Mt
Brrirr
6<7 fit atur
1 MKMtir
Mtttaf.
*. ^
H. ^
•'# Pf
tottr
«'
fcttr
$T
UUt
•?'
OtftUt
•r
Avir»|t
ir
.s
.31
YS./02.
bo. 027
II. S-90
/4.feV/
?/,?/
77,7a
72
73
/2-}^
¦V
t
i
!»U
f, 0
,50
0.3? /
9. S9^
/4.9SO
7^3/7
7-?,?!
73,73
e>SVl
-x>JlS
y7.it!
??55i.
73,7y
7/, 7?
tow
//3
77
S3
UK
X
S
\.
V
1
L 1"L
3*0
), /
Oo.ms
33.9s i
37.
s/^ss
7-/,?>
7/, 7?
/ / 3
03
*3
./?
1 }.H
iN
1
!•?*>
T AH* *-y
J,00SO
nz
S.tSl-xQ-^V x £?/..$•
y,W:
,W2
,03/7
>¦#» IW [~»~«> 11 8
(U ~ *o)[~^ J
A'jJ.r^.SSTv
y_L y.3*s J r /,
<^^7*^3 1 y..7Q it
S.JaT
J, 72 I
|/i,3t.c> *aq-sg ysgr-< y ^ -
/!>?«? rfd»9.gq*S??'5 ' /,<9/,o3
r>*n x /.g (ZZS-S^/OAl
s??y
.olO* 1 /7$73_77T?yw
/?2,
/?s.
1 • tot<* »f m«rK)r »f Mt tut atir to <17 toit nUr. Ttltrtnc* • i0.9).
DV • ©rifle* )rtitun MffttwUil thit |tm O.ft cfi »f air it wh ni 9.S
fadtei rf 11107, to. y, Tilirvci • All.
Hit tut tolmnct wit to «rltM« i 0.05 «nd vitltft
• reift tt 0.W
fttor tMk Ctoci frtot ^be*
Calffcrttlna toctaldM
HtotUaOMk
Klactfial Pwc*,
tmrte
D-10
-------
DRY GAS METER
(English Units)
CALIBRATION DATA
Pretest (2. Post Test Q]
Date ?/J i/rg
Meter Box # tV So
Barometric Pressure, Bp
Dry Gas Meter #
29-7W
C,(e, (fiOl
?/.DSn
K.ZVC
76,?^
77 %
fe
9/
S-^
/A?S
-?5V.S
/¦ -s~ / t n.K
39.-?C,xS-6.15.
tost teat toltnnct oust b* within * O.C8 and »1tMn
• r*«9a of 0.10
Utter Look Chock Fixnt ^Ld
/ Calibrating technician
Wtot look Chock >X
ClKtricol Chock ^
kaoarts
-Pf-
D-l 1
-------
DRY 6AS METER CALIBRATION DATA
(Engl1th Units) Frtteit 0 Po*t Teit 0
Pttc (rJ/t /£S Btrometrlc Prtuurt» Bp • ?
Meter Box I -it) Dry bs Meter I
Orlftc*
fcoitir ^ «ft
#f Mat Tnl Mktar
Ui v»1t«v
Mt U»t
HUr
'•i
n*
Yt«cxr»t»r*
11m
I.
Mi.
.00
1:
*H» 1
Cat toliM
%n lu
*t tMt
0«7 |il Mttr
I MKWUT
¦tttr
ft'
*t»r
•V
InHt
%"
OvtUt
•r
*
J.2S
<6*
2.C&?:
0.?13
M S] *
"V^^v^v. * ^4 Hi* J
Wwo xzqnu* S3f.? ' ,eiciS3
1
g-3,9vJ9-63k5^-s
g.(r7xJ^.^xSS0.2 ~aCn -
^9./ s 3 r ' /' £0%,
1
1
* • btt« «f Ktvrtcjf tf Mt Irtt atttr t» #17 tast Httr. T#1»r»*» • tO.Ol.
• OHflo fmirt Mt |1m 0.71 Cfh *f air at 70®T ».«
(**•1 «f Mrcwnr. H. 1^0. TaHrvic* • *0.11.
Nat bit t»l«r«Ki kilt W *rltM» i 0.0S and rltMi
• nag* af 0.10
fcUr l>4 k CM rn*t
CaHfcrttlna Uctalclift
iMk OMd I
-------
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Analytical Data
-------
TABLE E-l. DIOXIN/FURAN LABORATORY ANALYTICAL
DATA FOR BAGHOUSE OUTLET SAMPLES
ANALYTICAL DATA INPUT MATRIX FOR SITE CRF-A (OUTLET)
(picograms per sample train)
RUN 01 RUN 02 RUN 03
Species
Value
DL
Value
DL
Value
DL
2378 TCDD
.00
700.00
.00
200.00
.00
200.
00
Other TCDD
2300.00
.00
.00
300.00
300.00
00
2378 TCDF
.00
600.00
.00
600.00
.00
400.
00
Other TCDF
2100.00
.00
2000.00
.00
1400.00
.
00
Penta-CDD
1500.00
.00
500.00
.00
.00
500.
00
Penta-CDF
600.00
.00
1100.00
.00
.00
500.
00
Hexa-CDD
2400.00
.00
1200.00
.00
900.00
00
Hexa-CDF
1100.00
.00
800.00
.00
800.00
00
Hepta-CDD
1800.00
.00
1300.00
.00
1000.00
00
Hepta-CDF
1300.00
.00
800.00
.00
700.00
00
Octa-CDD
1600.00
.00
1100.00
.00
1000.00
00
Octa-CDF
900.00
.00
500.00
.00
1100.00
00
Value = amount detected in MM5 asmple train.
DL = detection limit of 6C/MS analysis.
E-l
-------
TABLE E-2. DIOXIN/FURAN LABORATORY ANALYTICAL
DATA FOR SPRAY COOLER INLET
ANALYTICAL DATA INPUT MATRIX FOR SITE CRF-A (INLET)
(picograms per sample train)
RUN 01 RUN 02 RUN 03
Species
Value
DL.
Value
DL
Value
DL
2378 TCDD
200.00
.00
200.00
.00
400.00
.00
Other TCDD
3600.00
.00
3500.00
.00
13900.00
.00
2378 TCDF
3500.00
.00
4700.00
.00
4200.00
.00
Other TCDF
47600.00
.00
69800.00
.00
63200.00
.00
Penta-CDD
7900.00
.00
1900.00
.00
11300.00
.00
Penta-CDF
34300.00
.00
37800.00
.00
56500.00
.00
Hexa-CDD
23600.00
.00
11700.00
.00
16400.00
.00
Hexa-CDF
40700.00
.00
49500.00
.00
51200.00
.00
Hepta-CDD
31100.00
.00
25300.00
.00
17900.00
.00
Hepta-CDF
28500.00
.00
44900.00
.00
40400.00
.00
Octa-CDD
35900.00
.00
43000.00
.00
9600.00
.00
Octa-CDF
13100.00
.00
19700.00
.00
15600.00
.00
Value = amount detected in MM5 sample train.
OL = detection limit of GC/MS analysis.
E-2
-------
TABLE E-3. COMPOUND-SPECIFIC DIOXIN PRECURSOR
DATA FOR SITE CRF-A FEED SAMPLES
Precursor
Precursor Concentration, ug/g (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Average
Base Neutrals Fraction
Chlorinated Benzenes:
Dichlorobenzenes
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
Trichlorobenzenes
1.70
0.14
6.27
2.70
Tetrachlorobenzenes
0.05
ND
0.34
0.13
Pentachlorobenzenes
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobenzenes
ND
ND
ND
ND
Total Chlorinated Benzenes
1.76
0.16
6.63
2.85
Chlorinated Biphenyls:
Chiorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dichlorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Trichlorobiphenyl s
ND
ND
ND
ND
Tetrachlorobi phenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pentachlorobi phenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlorobi phenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Octachlorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nonachlorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Decachlorobiphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Total Chlorinated Biphenyls
ND
ND
ND
ND
Acids Fraction
Chlorinated Phenols:
Dichlorophenols
ND
ND
ND
ND
Trichlorophenols
ND
ND
ND
ND
Tetrachlorophenols
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pentachlorophenols
ND
ND
ND
ND
Total Chlorinated Phenols
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not detected.
E-3
-------
TABLE E-4. HC1 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA FOR BAGHOUES OUTLET
TIER 4 DICKIN
HCL - SITE 09
Saople
Analysis
Blank Corrected
Site #
Field #
Ht.(ga)
¦g/1
Total ng in Staple
09-HCL-01-T
PI-4
/o l
09-HCL-O1-PR
386.3
3
1.16
09-HCL-01-IR
6
910.8
1
0.91
09-BCL-FBL-?
29
a/1
—
09-BCL-FBL-PK
30*19
167.1
<•1
0 9-HCL-PBL-IR
31
440.6
*1
09-HCL-02-F
47
^1
—
09-HCL-02-PR
48^7
357.9
6 ^6? 2.15
* 09-HCL-02-IR
49 + 50
1372.6
1
1.37
09-RBL-HaOB
78
99.8
*-1
09-HCL-03-F
79
vl
—
09-HCL-O3-PR
80
199.0
5
1.00
09-BCL-03-IR
81
1299.4
1
1.30
Site #
Field # Vt.(gm)
PPM/of
Audit mg/1
mg/in sample
09-BCL-Audit #1
105
164.4
500
510
09-BCL-Audit *2
106
151.7
100
100
09-HCL-Audit #3
107
186.4
5000
4910
09-BCL-Audit #4
108
169.7
1000
974
09-BCL-Audit *5
109
193.4
5000
4910
51083.84
101) ^ 15.24
4930k 917.09
97 4-iajw/984)^16 6.14
4890/ 947.66
* Tlo© be Wk)
ft k* lo, d<+p}/c*F
-------
APPENDIX F
Project Participants
-------
Project Participants
Radian Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
Winton Kelly Field Test Engineer
Robert Jongleux Test Crew Leader
Dave Savia CEM Operator
Debra Benson Sample Recovery
James McReynolds Sampler
Gary Henry Sampler
Carol Jamgochian Sampler
Lee Garcia Sampler
Mike Hartman Sampler
Environmental Protection Agency
Hazardous Waste Environmental Research Facility, Cincinnati, OH
Ivars Licis
F-l
-------
APPENDIX G
Sample Shipment Letter
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
May 31, 1985
D.S. BPA BCC Toxicant Analysis Center
Building 1105
Bay St. Louis, MS 39529
Attention: Danny McDaniel
Subject: Tier 4 - Analysis Instructions
Dear Sir:
The objective of this letter is to clarify instructions and
priorities for individual samples from specific Tier 4 combustion sites.
This instruction letter is Mo. 13 and pertains to EPA Site Mo. 09
(CRF-A).
The Episode Mo. is 2674, and SCC numbers assigned to this site vere
numbers DQ003100 through DQ003199.
SCC numbers SQ003101 through DQ003106 have been assigned to Troika
for internal QA/QC purposes* SCC nimbers DQ003107 through DQ003138 have been
assigned to samples included in this shipment. All remaining SCC numbers are
unused.
The sample shipment for EPA Site No. 09 (C&F-A) consists of 5 boxes
containing 77 samples of 66 components. The boxes were shipped under Federal
Express, Airbill Mos. 770332695 and 289783406.
Instructions for extraction and analysis follow.
1. Priority #1 samples include the sample train components, the
baghouse dust, reactivated carbon samples, the lab proof blank, and
the reagent blanks. These samples require immediate extraction and
analysis.
MM5 TEA IN SAMPLES (* indicates more than one sample per component),.
(# indicates H.O in addition to acetone and MeCl.
in rinse)
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BI-01 (Total of 6 train components)
SCC Ho.
Container
Fraction
DQ003108
DQ003108
DQ003108
DQ003108
DQ003108
DQ003108
1
2*#
3
4*
5
6*
Filter
Probe Rinse
Back Half/Coil Rinse
Condensate
Impinger Solution
XAD Module
G-l
Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill fld./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Bo* 13000/Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
0. S. EPA ECC Toxicant Analysis Center
Page two
Kay 31, 1985
Radian Sun t 09-MM5-BO-01 (Total of 6 train conponenta)
SCC No.
Container
Fraction
DQ003109
1
Filter
DQ003109
2*#
Probe Rinae
DQ003109
3
Back Half/Coil Rinae
DQ003109
4*
Condenaate
DQ003109
5
Inpinger Solution
DQ003109
6
XAD Module
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BI-02 (Total of 6 train conponenta)
DQ003113
1
Filter
DQ003113
2*#
Probe Rinae
DQ003113
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003113
4*
Condensate
DQ003113
5
Zmpinger Solution
DQ003113
6
XAD Module
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BO-02 (Total of 6 train conponenta)
DQ0031U
1
Filter
DQ003114
2+#
Probe Rinse
DQ003114
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003114
4*
Condenaate
DQ003U4
5
Impinger Solution
DQ003114
6
ZAS Module
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BI-FBL (Total of 6 train conponenta)
DQ003115
1
Filter
DQ003115
2#
Probe Rinae
DQ003115
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003115
4
Condensate
DQ003115
5
Impinger Solution
DQ003115
6
XAD Module
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BO-PBL (Total of 6 train conponenta)
DQ003116
1
Filter
DQ003116
2#
DQ003116
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003116
4
Condensate
DQ003116
5
Impinger Solution
DQ003U6
6
XAD Module
G-e
Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100
-------
RADIAN
CORPORATION
0. S. EPA BCC Toxicant Analysis Center
Page three
Kay 31, 1965
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BI-03 (Total of 6 train components)
SCC No.
Container
Fraction
DQ003124
1
Filter
DQ003124
2#
Probe Rinse
DQ003124
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003124
4*
Condensate
DQ003124
5
Iapinger Solution
DQ003124
6
XAD Module
Radian Run # 09-MM5-BO-03
(Total of 6 train components)
DQ003125
1
Filter
DQ003125
2#
Probe Rinse
DQ00312S
3
Back Half/Coil Rinse
DQ003125
4*
Condensate
DQ003125
5
Iapinger Solution
DQ003125
6
XAD Module
AMBIENT XAD IRA 18
Radian Run #09-AMB-A
SCC Mo.
Container
Fraction
SQ003120
1
Probe Rinse
DQ003120
2
XAD Module
LABORATORY PR00P BLANK
SCC Ho.
Container
Fraction
DQ003107
I
Filter
DQ003107
2
Probe Rinse,
Back Half/Coil Rinse
and Impinger Soln.
DQ003107
3
XAE Module
REAGENT BLANKS
SCC Ho.
Sample
DQ003121
DQ003122
DQ003123
HPLC grade vater blank
Acetone blank
Methylene chloride blank
Progress Centerf3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hw> m 130001 Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709/(919)541 -9100
-------
CORPORATION
D. S. EPA SCC Toxicant Analysis Center
Page four
May 31, 1985
BAGHOUSE DUST
SCC Ho.
Dq003110
DQ003U7
DQ003126
PROCESS SAMPLE
Sample
Baghouae Dust, Sua 01
Bagbouse Duat, Sua 02
Baghouae Duat, Sun 03
REACTIVATED CARBON - PROCESS SAMPLE
SCC Mo.
DQ003112
DQ003I19
DQ003128
Sample
Reactivated Carbon, Sun 01
Reactivated Carbon, Sua 02
Reactivated Carbon, Sun 03
2. The spent carbon feed and ambient air train coaponenta are Priority 41
samples* The samples should be held at Troika pending the results of
the Priority #1 samples.
SPENT CARBON PEED - PROCESS SAMPLE
SCC Ho.
DQ0Q3111
DQ003118
DQ003127
Sample
Spent carbon feed, Sun 01
Spent carbon feed, Run 02
Spent carbon feed, Run 03
If any questions arise concerning this sample shipment, please contact
either Vinton Kelly or Robert Joogleux at Radian Corporation at
(919) 541-9100.
Sincerely
LEADER
TEST
cc: E. Hanks/EPA/AHTB
A. Miles/Radian
Radian Field File - RTP/PPK
6-4
Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Bo* 13000/Research Triancle Park N C ?77nq/fQiQ^Ai mnn
Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Bo* S/lesS
-------
APPENDIX H
Run-specific Dioxin/Furan Emissions Data
-------
TABLE H-1. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 1, SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(ppt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
1.79E-
•01)
ND (
1.33E-
02)
ND ( 3.79E+00)
Other TCDD
5.87E-01(
N/A
)
4.38E-02(
N/A
)
1.25E+01
Penta-CDD
3.83E-01(
N/A
)
2.59E-02(
N/A
)
8.12E+00
Hexa-CDD
6.12E-0I(
N/A
)
3.77E-02(
N/A
)
1.30E+01
Hepta-CDD
4.59E-01(
N/A
)
2.60E-02(
N/A
)
9.75E+00
Octa-CDD
4.08E-01(
N/A
)
2.13E-02(
N/A
)
8.66E+00
Total PCDD
2.45E+00
1.55E-01
5.20E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
1.53E
-01)
ND (
1.20E-
-02)
ND ( 3.25E+00)
Other TCDF
5.36E-01(
N/A
)
4.21E-02(
N/A
)
1.14E+01
Penta-CDF
1.53 E - 01 (
N/A
)
1.08E-02(
N/A
)
3.25E+00
Hexa-CDF
2.81E-01(
N/A
)
1.80E-02(
N/A
)
5.96E+00
Hepta-CDF
3.32E-0I(
N/A
)
1.95E-02(
N/A
)
7.04E+00
Octa-CDF
2.30E-01(
N/A
)
1.24E-02(
N/A
)
4.87E+00
Total PCDF
1.53E+00
1.03E-01
3.25E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-l
-------
TABLE H-2. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION
DATA FOR RUN 2, SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(PPt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
5.29E-02)
ND (
3.95E
¦03)
ND ( 1.16E+00)
Other TCDO
ND (
7.94E-02)
ND (
5.93E
-03)
ND ( 1.75E+00)
Penta-CDD
1.32E-01(
N/A )
8.94E-03(
N/A
)
2.91E+00
Hexa-CDD
3.17E-01(
N/A )
1.95E-02(
N/A
)
6.99E+00
Hepta-CDD
3.44E-01(
N/A )
1.95E-02(
N/A
)
7.57E+00
Octa-CDD
2.91E-01(
N/A )
1.52E-02(
N/A
)
6.41E+00
Total PCDD
1.08E+00
6.32E-02
2.39E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
1.59E-01)
ND (
1.25E
-02)
ND ( 3.49E+00)
Other TCDF
5.29E-01(
N/A )
4.16E-02(
N/A
)
1.16E+01
Penta-CDF
2-91E-01(
N/A )
2.06E-02(
N/A
)
6.41E+00
Hexa-CDF
2.12E-01(
N/A )
1.36E-02(
N/A
)
4.66E+00
Hepta-CDF
2.12E-01(
N/A )
1.24E-02(
N/A
)
4.66E+00
Octa-CDF
1.32E-01(
N/A )
7.17 E-03(
N/A
)
2.91E+00
Total PCDF
1.38E+00
9.54E-02
3.03E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-2
-------
TABLE H-3. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 3, SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(PPt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
4.61E-02)
ND (
3.44E-03)
ND ( 1.18E+00)
Other TCDD
6.91E-02(
N/A )
5.16E-03(
N/A )
1.78E+00
Penta-CDD
ND (
1.15E-01)
ND (
7.78E-03
ND ( 2.96E+00)
Hexa-CDD
2.07E-01(
N/A )
1.28E-02(
N/A j
5.33E+00
Hepta-CDD
2.30E-01(
N/A )
1.30E-02(
N/A )
5.92E+00
Octa-CDD
2.30E-01(
N/A )
1.20E-02(
N/A )
5.92E+00
Total PCDD
7.37E-01
4.30E-02
1.90E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
9.22E-02)
ND (
7.25E-03)
ND ( 2.37E+00)
Other TCDF
3.23E-01(
N/A )
2.54E-02(
N/A )
8.29E+00
Penta-CDF
ND (
1.15E-01)
ND (
8.15E-03)
ND ( 2.96E+00)
Hexa-CDF
1.84E-01(
N/A )
1.18E-02(
N/A )
4.74E+00
Hepta-CDF
1.61E-01(
N/A )
9.49E-03(
N/A )
4.15E+00
Octa-CDF
2.53E-01(
N/A )
1.37E-02(
N/A )
6.52E+00
Total PCDF
9.22E-01
6.04E-02
2.37E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits -of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug » 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-3
-------
TABLE H-4. SPRAY COOLER INLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 1, SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(PPt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
5.12E-02(
N/A )
3.82E-03(
N/A )
7.18E-01
Other TCDD
9.21E-01(
N/A )
6.88E-02(
N/A )
1.29E+01
Penta-CDD
2.02E+00(
N/A )
1.37E-01(
N/A )
2.84E+01
Hexa-CDD
6.04E+00(
N/A )
3.71E-01(
N/A )
8.48E+01
Hepta-CDD
7.95E+00(
N/A )
4.50E-01(
N/A )
1.12E+02
Octa-CDD
9.18E+00(
N/A )
4.80E-01(
N/A )
1.29E+02
Total PCDD
2.62E+0I
1.51E+00
3.68E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
8.95E-01(
N/A )
7.04E-02(
N/A )
1.26E+01
Other TCDF
1.22E+01(
N/A )
9.57E-01(
N/A )
1.71E+02
Penta-CDF
8.77E+00
N/A )
6.21E-01(
N/A )
1.23E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.04E+01(
N/A )
6.68E-01(
N/A )
1.46E+02
Hepta-CDF
7.29E+00(
N/A )
4.29E-01(
N/A )
1.02E+02
Octa-CDF
3.35E+00(
N/A )
1.82E-01(
N/A )
4.71E+01
Total PCDF
4.29E+01
2.93E+00
6.02E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng => 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
-------
TABLE H-5. SPRAY COOLER INLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 2, SITE CRF-A
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(ppt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
4.95E-02(
N/A )
3.70E-03(
N/A )
7.31E-01
Other TCDD
8.66E-01(
N/A )
6.47E-02(
N/A )
1.28E+01
Penta-CDD
4.70E-01(
N/A )
3.18E-02(
N/A )
6.95E+00
Hexa-CDD
2.90E+00(
N/A )
1.78E-01(
N/A )
4.28E+01
Hepta-CDD
6.26E+00(
N/A )
3.54E-01(
N/A )
9.25E+01
Octa-CDD
1.06E+01(
N/A )
5.57E-01(
N/A )
1.57E+02
Total PCDD
2.12E+01
1.19E+00
3.13E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1 -16E+00(
N/A )
9.15E-02(
N/A )
1.72E+01
Other TCDF
1.73E+01(
N/A )
1.36E+00(
N/A )
2.55E+02
Penta-CDF
9.36E+00(
N/A )
6.62E-01(
N/A )
1.38E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.23E+01(
N/A )
7.86E-01(
N/A )
1.81E+02
Hepta-CDF
1.11E+01(
N/A )
6.54E-01(
N/A )
1.64E+02
Octa-CDF
4.88E+00(
N/A )
2:64E-01(
N/A )
7.20E+01
Total PCDF
5.60E+01
3.82E+00
8.28E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
NO =» Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-5
-------
TABLE H-6. SPRAY COOLER INLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 3, SITE CRF-A
Qioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm)
(PPt)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
8.87E-02(
N/A )
6.63E-03(
N/A )
1.44E+00
Other TCDD
3.08E+00(
N/A )
2.30E-01(
N/A )
5.00E+01
Penta-CDD
2-51E+00(
N/A )
1.69E-01(
N/A )
4.07E+01
Hexa-CDD
3.64E+00(
N/A )
2.24E-01(
N/A )
5.90E+01
Hepta-CDD
3.97E+00(
N/A )
2.25E-01(
N/A )
6.44E+01
Octa-CDD
2.13E+00(
N/A )
1.11E-01(
N/A )
3.46E+01
Total PCDD
1.54E+0I
9.66E-01
2.50E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
9.31E-01(
N/A )
7.32E-02(
N/A )
1.51E+01
Other TCDF
1.40E+01(
N/A )
1.10E+00(
N/A )
2.28E+02
Penta-CDF
1.25E+01(
N/A )
8.86E-01(
N/A )
2.03E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.14E+01(
N/A )
7.28E-0I (
N/A ]
1.84E+02
Hepta-CDF
8.96E+00(
N/A )
5.27E-01(
N/A )
1.45E+02
Octa-CDF
3.46E+00(
N/A )
1.87E-01(
N/A )
5.62E+01
Total PCDF
5.I2E+01
3.50E+00
8.32E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are at as-measured oxygen conditions.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-6
-------
TABLE H-7. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 1, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% Oj)
Oioxin/Furan
Isomer
Isomer Concentration
In Flue Gas
(ng/dscm @ 3% oxygen)
I softer Concentration
In Flue Gas
(ppt @ 3% oxygen)
Isomer Hourly
Emissions Rate
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
4.61E-01)
ND (
3.45E-02)
ND ( 3.79E+00)
Other TCDD
1.52E+00(
N/A )
1.13E-01(
N/A
1.25E+01
Penta-CDD
9.88E-01(
N/A )
6.68E-02(
N/A )
8.12E+00
Hexa-CDD
1.58E+00(
N/A )
9.73E-02(
N/A )
1.30E+01
Hepta-CDD
1.19E+0Q(
N/A )
6.71E-02(
N/A )
9.75E+00
Octa-CDD
1.05E+00(
N/A )
5.51E-02(
N/A )
8.66E+00
Total PCDD
6.32E+00
3.99E-01
5.20E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
3.95E-01)
NO (
3.11E-02)
ND ( 3.25E+00)
Other TCDF
1.38E+00(
N/A )
1.09E-01(
N/A )
1.14E+01
Penta-CDF
3.95E-01(
N/A )
2.80E-02(
N/A )
3.25E+00
Hexa-CDF
7.25E-01(
N/A )
4.65E-02(
N/A )
5.96E+00
Hepta-CDF
8.56E-01(
N/A )
5.04E-02(
N/A )
7.04E+00
Octa-CDF
5.93E-01(
N/A )
3.21E-02(
N/A )
4.87E+00
Total PCDF
3.95E+00
2.66E-01
3.25E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses}.
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = l.OE-OSg,
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-7
-------
TABLE H-8. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 2, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3%
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm @ 3% oxygen)
(ppt @ 3% oxygen)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
1.31E-01)
ND (
9.76E-03)
ND ( 1.16E+00)
Other TCDD
ND (
1.96E-01)
ND (
1.46E-02)
ND ( 1.75E+00)
Penta-CDD
3.27E-01(
N/A )
2.21E-02(
N/A )
2.91E+00
Hexa-CDD
7.84E-01(
N/A )
4.82E-02(
N/A )
6.99E+00
Hepta-CDD
8.49E-01(
N/A )
4.81E-02(
N/A )
7.57E+00
Octa-CDD
7.I9E-01(
N/A )
3.76E-02(
N/A )
6.41E+00
Total PCDD
2.68E+00
1.56E-01
2.39E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
3.92E-01)
ND (
3.08E-02)
ND ( 3.49E+00)
Other TCDF
1.31E+00(
N/A )
1.03E-01 (
N/A )
1.16E+01
Penta-CDF
7.19E-01(
N/A )
5.08E-02(
N/A )
6.41E+00
Hexa-CDF
5.23E-01(
N/A )
3.35E-02(
N/A )
4.66E+00
Hepta-CDF
5.23E-01(
N/A )
3.07E-02 (
N/A )
4.66E+00
Octa-CDF
3.27E-01(
N/A )
1.77E-02(
N/A )
2.91E+00
Total PCDF
3.40E+00
2.35E-01
3.03E+01
MOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = I.OE-O69,
ppt = parts per trillion, dry.volume basis
6760 operating hours per year
H-8
-------
TABLE H-9. BAGHOUSE OUTLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
OATA FOR RUN 3, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% O2)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm @ 3% oxygen)
(ppt @ 3% oxygen)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
ND (
1.30E-01)
ND (
9.70E-03)
ND ( 1.18E+00)
Other TCDD
1.95E-01(
N/A )
1.45E-02(
N/A )
1.78E+00
Penta-CDD
ND (
3.25E-01)
ND (
2.19E-02)
ND ( 2.96E+00)
Hexa-CDD
5.84E-01(
N/A )
3.59E-02(
N/A )
5.33E+00
Hepta-CDD
6.49E-01(
N/A )
3.67E-02(
N/A )
5.92E+00
Octa-CDD
6.49E-01(
N/A )
3.39E-02(
N/A )
5.92E+00
Total PCDD
2.08E+00
1.21E-01
1.90E+01
FURANS
2378 TCDF
ND (
2.60E-01)
ND (
2.04E-02)
ND ( 2.37E+00)
Other TCDF
9.09E-01(
N/A )
7.14E-02(
N/A )
8.29E+00
Penta-COF
NO (
3.25E-0I)
ND (
2.30E-02)
ND ( 2.96E+00)
Hexa-CDF
5.19E-01(
N/A )
3.33E-02(
N/A )
4.74E+00
Hepta-CDF
4.54E-01(
N/A )
2.67E-02(
N/A )
4.15E+00
Octa-CDF
7.14E-01(
N/A )
3.87E-02(
N/A )
6.52E+00
Total PCDF
2.60E+00
1.70E-01
2.37E+01
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
NO = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A - Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-9
-------
TABLE H-10. SPRAY COOLER INLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 1, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% Og)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm 0 3% oxygen)
(ppt 1? 3% oxygen)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
6.86E-02(
N/A )
5.13E-03(
N/A )
7.18E-01
Other TCDD
1.23E+00
N/A )
9.23E-02(
N/A )
1.29E+01
Penta-CDD
2.71E+00(
N/A )
1.83E-01(
N/A )
2.84E+01
Hexa-CDD
8.10E+00(
N/A )
4.98E-01(
N/A )
8.48E+01
Hepta-CDD
1.07E+01(
N/A )
6.04E-01(
N/A )
1.12E+02
Octa-CDD
1.23E+01(
N/A )
6.44E-01(
N/A )
1.29E+02
Total PCDD
3.51E+01
2.03E+00
3.68E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1.20E+00(
N/A )
9.44E-02(
N/A )
1.26E+01
Other TCDF
I.63E+01(
N/A )
1.28E+00(
N/A )
1.71E+02
Penta-CDF
1.18E+01(
N/A )
8.32E-01(
N/A )
I.23E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.40E+01(
N/A )
8.96E-01(
N/A )
1.46E+02
Hepta-CDF
9.78E+00(
N/A )
5.75E-01(
N/A )
1.02E+02
Octa-CDF
4.49E+00(
N/A )
2.43E-01(
N/A )
4.71E+01
Total PCDF
5.75E+01
3.92E+00
6.02E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
NO = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.OE-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-10
-------
table H-ll. spray cooler inlet dioxin/furan emissions
DATA FOR RUN 2, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% O^)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm 0 3% oxygen)
(ppt 0 2% oxygen)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
6.12E-02(
N/A )
4.58E-03(
N/A )
7.3IE-01
Other TCDD •
1,07E+00(
N/A )
8.01E-021
N/A )
1.28E+01
Penta-CDD
5.82E-01(
N/A )
3.93E-02(
N/A )
6.95E+00
Hexa-CDD
3.58E+00(
N/A )
2.20E-01(
N/A )
4.28E+01
Hepta-CDD
7.75E+00(
N/A )
4.39E-01{
N/A )
9.25E+01
Octa-CDD
1.32E+01(
N/A )
6.89E-01(
N/A )
1.57E+02
Total PCDD
2.62E+01
1.47E+00
3.13E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1.44E+00(
N/A )
1.13E-01(
N/A )
1.72E+01
Other TCDF
2.14E+01
N/A )
1.68E+00(
N/A )
2.55E+02
Penta-CDF
1.16E+01(
N/A }
8.19E-01(
N/A )
1.38E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.52E+01(
N/A )
9.72E-01(
N/A )
1.8IE+02
Hepta-CDF
1.37E+01(
N/A )
S.09E-01(
N/A )
1.64E+02
Octa-CDF
6.03E+00{
N/A )
3.27E-01(
N/A )
7.20E+01
Total PCDF
6.93E+01
4.72E+00
8.28E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
ND =» Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-ll
-------
TABLE H-12. SPRAY COOLER INLET DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSIONS
DATA FOR RUN 3, SITE CRF-A
(Concentrations Corrected to 3% O2)
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Concentration
Isomer Hourly
Isomer
In Flue
Gas
In Flue
Gas
Emissions Rate
(ng/dscm 0 3% oxygen)
(ppt (? 3% oxygen)
(ug/hr)
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
1.44E-01(
N/A )
1.08E-02(
N/A )
1.44E+00
Other TCDD
5.02E+00
N/A )
3.75E-01(
N/A )
5.00E+01
Penta-CDD
4.08E+00(
N/A )
2.76E-01(
N/A )
4.07E+01
Hexa-CDD
5.92E+00(
N/A )
3.64E-01(
N/A )
5.90E+01
Hepta-CDD
6.46E+00(
N/A )
3.66E-01(
N/A )
6.44E+01
Octa-CDD
3.46E+00(
N/A )
1.81E-01(
N/A )
3.46E+01
Total PCDD
2.51E+01
1.57E+00
2.50E+02
FURANS
2378 TCDF
1.52E+00(
N/A )
1.19E-01(
N/A )
1.51E+01
Other TCDF
2.28E+01(
N/A )
1.79E+00(
N/A )
2.28E+02
Penta-CDF
2.04E+01(
N/A )
1.44E+00(
N/A )
2.03E+02
Hexa-CDF
1.85E+01(
N/A )
1.19E+00(
N/A )
1.84E+02
Hepta-CDF
1.46E+01(
N/A )
8.57E-01(
N/A )
1.45E+02
Octa-CDF
5.63E+00(
N/A )
3.05E-01(
N/A )
5.62E+01
Total PCDF
8.34E+01
5.70E+00
8.32E+02
NOTE: Isomer concentrations shown are corrected to 3% oxygen.
ND = Not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A =¦ Not applicable. QA samples indicate the method capabilities and
minimum limits of detection when values are positive,
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
ppt = parts per trillion, dry volume basis
8760 operating hours per year
H-12
-------
APPENDIX I
Error Analysis of Control Device Efficiency Calculations
-------
APPENDIX I
ERROR ANALYSIS: CONTROL DEVICE EFFICIENCY CALCULATIONS
Objective: Given the analytical uncertainty of the dioxin/furan analyses
(+ 50% accuracy), estimate the uncertainty of the control device
efficiency calculations.
Let: Cm,t moac 3 the measured concentration of a given dioxin/furan
' homologue at the outlet location.
C• = the measured concentration of a given dioxin/furan
' homologue at the inlet location.
C t =¦ the maximum possible concentration of the dioxin/
' furan homologue given the measured value Cout,meas'
C t ¦ = the minimum possible concentration of the dioxin/
oui,m fUran homologue given the measured value CQU^ meas-
es » the maximum possible concentration of the dioxin/
in, ax furan homologue, given the measured value Cin meas-
C. . = the minimum possible concentration of the dioxin/
in,min furan homologue, given the measured value C.
3 9 in,meas
E = the removal efficiency of the control device
Assuming + 50 percent analytical accuracy:
C . = C - 0.5 C =• 0.5 C
mm meas meas meas
C - C + 0.5 C - 1.5 C
max meas meas meas
r C i p
Note that: E = in.max " out.min 3 " out.min
max —p — /. —
in,max in,max
Emax - 1 - " = 1 - V3 (1 - Emeas)
in,meas
" 2/3 + Emeas
1-1
-------
and:
C - C
E . = in.min out.max
mm p
in,min
1 - C
out.max
C •
m,imn
= 1 - ^out.meas
0.5 C
in,meas
1 - 3 (1 - E )
v meas'
- 3 E_oae. - 2
min meas
Now,
E • > 0
mm
positive control (i.e., emissions
reduction across the control device)
(3Emflac - 2) > 0
v meas '
E > V
meas > /3
Therefore, if Emeas is larger than 66.7 percent, the true removal efficiency
can safely be assumed to be greater than zero.
And,
E„ax < 0
2/, * E
negative control (i.e., emissions
increase across the control device)
3 meas
< 0
^meas < "2
Therefore, if E is less than -200 percent, the true efficiency can safely
meas
be assumed to be less than zero.
To summarize:
> 66.7 percent
meas r
positive control
-200 < Em„„ < 66.7 percent
meas r
no definitive conclusions
can be drawn
< 200 percent
meas
no negative control
1-2
-------
TABLE 1.1 VALUES OF E and E • FOR VARIOUS MEASURED CONTROL EFFICIENCIES
max mln
Control Device Efficiency
^meas
^max
^min
100
100
100
95
98.3
85
90
96.7
70
85
95.0
55
80
93.4
40
75
91.7
25
50
83.4
-50
25
75.0
-125
0
56.7
-200
-25
58.4
-275
-50
50.0
-350
-100
33.4
-500
-200
0
-800
E - (200 + E J/3
max meas'
EnH„ " 3Emflae - 200
mm me as
1-3
-------
APPENDIX J
Run-specific Homologue Distributions
-------
TABLE J-l. HOMOLOGUE DISTRIBUTION AT THE INLET AT SITE CRF-A
HOMOLOGUE
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
Other TCDD
Penta-CDD
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-CDD
FURANS
2378 TCDF
Other TCDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
HOMOLOGUE
FRACTION
RUN
01
RUN
02
RUN
03
MASS
MOLE
MASS
MOLE
MASS
MOLE
0.002
0.0025
0.0023
0.0031
0.0058
0.0069
0.0352
0.0455
0.0409
0.0544
0.2
0.2384
0.0772
0.0904
0.0222
0.0267
0.1626
0.1753
0.2307
0.2458
0.1367
0.1498
0.236
0.2316
0.304
0.298
0.2956
0.298
0.2576
0.2326
0.3509
0.3178
0.5023
0.468
0.1381
0.1152
0.0209 0.024
0.2838 0.3271
0.2045 0.2121
0.2427 0.2282
0.1699 0.1465
0.0781 0.062
0.0208 0.024
0.3083 0.356
0.167 0.1735
0.2186 0.206
0.1983 0.1713
0.087 0.0692
0.0182 0.0209
0.2735 0.3144
0.2445 0.253
0.2215 0.2079
0.1748 0.1504
0.0675 0.0535
J-l
-------
TABLE J-2. HOMOLOGUE DISTRIBUTION AT THE OUTLET AT SITE CRF-A
HOMOLOGUE
DIOXINS
2378 TCDD
Other TCDD
Penta-CDD
Hexa-CDD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-CDD
FURANS
2378 TCDF
Other TCDF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-CDF
HOMOLOGUE
FRACTION
RUN
01
RUN
02
RUN
03
MASS
MOLE
MASS
MOLE
MASS
MOLE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2396
0.2834
0
0
0.0937
0.1201
0.1563
0.1671
0.122
0.1415
0
0
0.25
0.2435
0.2927
0.3093
0.2813
0.2966
0.1875
0.168
0.3171
0.3082
0.3125
0.3032
0.1667
0.138
0.2683
0.241
0.3125
0.2801
0 0
0.35 0.4093
0.1 0.1053
0.1833 0.175
0.2167 0.1896
0.15 0.1209
0 0
0.3846 0.4361
0.2115 0.2159
0.1538 0.1423
0.1538 0.1305
0.0962 0.0751
0 0
0.35 0.4198
0 0
0.2 0.1958
0.175 0.1571
0.275 0.2273
J-2
-------
APPENDIX K
Run-specific Risk Modeling Input Data
-------
TABLE K-l. 8AGH0USE OUTLET EXHAUST STACK RISK MODELING
PARAMETERS FOR RUN 1, SITE CRF-A
Latitude = 40 29 32
Longitude = 80 04 39
Stack Height (From Grade Level) = 22.5 in
Stack Diameter (ID) = 1.2 m
Flue Gas Flow Rate (Dry Standard) = 353.7 dscmm
Flue Gas Exit Temperature = 444.0 K
Flue Gas Exit Velocity (Actual) = 745.2 mpm
Oioxin/Furan
Isomer
Isomer Hourly
Relative
2,3,7,8 - TCDD
Isomer
Concentration
Emissions
Potency
Equivalent
In Flue Gas
Rate
Factor
Emissions
(ng/dscm)
(ug/hr)
(mg/yr)
2378 TCDD
ND ( 1.79E-01)
ND ( 3.79E+00)
1.000
ND ( 3.32E+01)
Other TCDD
5.87E-01
1.25E+01
.010
1.09E+00
2378 TCDF
ND ( 1.53E-01)
ND ( 3.25E+00)
.100
NO ( 2.85E+00)
Other TCDF
5.36E-01
1.14E+01
.001
9.96E-02
Penta-CDO
3.83E-0I
8.12E+O0
.500
3.56E+01
Penta-COF
1.53E-01
3.25E+00
.100
2.85E+00
Hexa-CDD
5.12E-01
1.30E+01
.040
4.55E+00
Hexa-CDF
2.81E-01
5.96E+00
.010
5.22E-01
Hepta-CDD
4.59E-01
9.75E+00
.001
8.54E-02
Hepta-CDF
3.32E-01
7.04E+Q0
.001
6.17E-02
Qcta-CDD
4.08E-01
8.66E+00
.000
.OQE+CO
Qcta-CDF
2.30E-01
4.87E+C0
.000
.OQE+OO
Net 2378 TCDD Equivalent Atmospheric Loading
4.48E+01
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = detection limit not available
ng a 1.OE-09g
ug = I.0E-Q6g
mg = 1.0E-Q3g
Standard conditions: 293 K (20 C) temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure.
8760 operating hours per year
K-l
-------
TABLE K-2. 8AGH0USE OUTLET EXHAUST STACK RISK MODELING
PARAMETERS FOR RUN 2, SITE CRF-A
Latitude = 40 29 32
Longitude =* 80 04 39
Stack Height (From Grade Level) = 22.5 m
Stack Diameter (ID) =¦ 1.2 m
Flue Gas Flow Rate (Dry Standard) = 366.9 dscmm
Flue Gas Exit Temperature =¦ 446.5 K
Flue Gas Exit Velocity (Actual) = 786.7 mpm
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Isomer Hourly
Relative
2,3,7,8 - TCDD
Isomer
Concentration
Emissions
Potency
Equivalent
In Flue Gas
Rate
Factor
Emissions
(ng/dscm)
(ug/hr)
(mg/yr)
2378 TCDD
ND ( 5.29E-02)
ND ( 1.16E+00)
1.000
ND ( 1.02E+01)
Other TCDD
ND ( 7.94E-02)
ND ( 1.75E+00)
.010
ND ( 1.53E-01)
2378 TCDF
ND ( 1.59E-0])
ND ( 3.49E+00)
.100
ND ( 3.05E+00)
Other TCDF
5.29E-01
1.16E+01
.001
1.02E-01
Penta-CDD
1.32E-01
2.91E+00
.500
1.28E+01
Penta-CDF
2.91E-01
6.41E+00
.100
5.61E+00
Hexa-CDD
3.17E-01
6.99E+00
.040
2.45E+00
Hexa-CDF
2.12E-01
4.66E+00
.010
4.08E-01
Hepta-CDD
3.44E-0I
7.57E+00
.001
6.63E-02
Hepta-CDF
2.12E-01
4.66E+00
.001
4.08E-02
Octa-CDD
2.91E-01
6.41E+00
.000
.OOE+OO
Octa-CDF
1.32E-01
2.91E+00
.000
.00E+00
Net 2378 TCDD Equivalent Atmospheric Loading
2.14E+01
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = detection limit not available
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
mg = 1.0E-03g
Standard conditions: 293 K (20 C) temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure.
8760 operating hours per year
K-2
-------
TABLE K-3. BAGHOUSE OUTLET EXHAUST STACK RISK MODELING
PARAMETERS FOR RUN 3, SITE CRF-A
Latitude = 40 29 32
Longitude ° 80 04 39
Stack Height (From Grade Level) = 22.5 m
Stack Diameter (ID) =¦ 1.2 m
Flue Gas Flow Rate (Dry Standard) - 428.5 dscmm
Flue Gas Exit Temperature = 440.3 K
Flue Gas Exit Velocity (Actual) = 897.4 mpm
Dioxin/Furan
Isomer
Isomer Hourly
Relative
2,3,
7,8 - TCDD
Isomer
Concentration
Emissions
Potency
Equivalent
In Flue Gas
Rate
Factor
Emissions
(ng/dscm)
(ug/hr)
(mg/yr)
2378 TCDD
ND ( 4.61E-02)
ND ( 1.18E+00)
1.000
ND
( 1.04E+01)
Other TCDD
6.91E-02
1.78E+00
.010
1.56E-01
2378 TCDF
ND ( 9.22E-02)
ND ( 2.37E+00)
.100
ND
( 2.08E+00)
Other TCDF
3.23E-01
8.29E+00
.001
7.27E-02
Penta-CDD
ND ( 1.15E-01)
ND ( 2.96E+00)
.500
ND
( 1.30E+01)
Penta-CDF
ND ( 1.15E-01)
ND ( 2.96E+00)
.100
ND
( 2.59E+00)
Hexa-CDD
2.07E-01
5.33E+00
.040
1.87E+00
Hexa-CDF
1.84E-01
4.74E+00
.010
4.15E-01
Hepta-CDD
2.30E-01
5.92E+00
.001
5.19E-02
Hepta-CDF
1.61E-01
4.15E+00
.001
3.63E-02
Octa-CDD
2.30E-01
5.92E+00
.000
.OOE+OO
Octa-CDF
2.53E-01
5.52E+00
.000
.00E+00
Net 2378 TCDD
Equivalent Atmospheric Loading
2.60E+00
ND = not detected (detection limit in parentheses).
N/A = detection limit not available
ng = 1.0E-09g
ug = 1.0E-06g
mg = 1.0E-03g
Standard conditions: 293 K (20 C) temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure.
8760 operating hours per year
K-3
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read InUmctions on the reverie before completing)
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-450/4-84-014r
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
National Dioxin Study Tier 4 - Combustion Sources
Final Test Report - Site 9
Carbon Regeneration Furnace CRF - A
5. REPORT DATE
April 1987
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Carol L. Jamgochian, Lawrence E. Keller
Winton Kelly
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
87-231-056-12-43
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS
Radian Corporation
Post Office Box 13000
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3850
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME ANO AOORESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 0AQPS
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
13. TYPE OF Rjjr£°nJ AN0 P6RIOO COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY COOE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
EPA Project Officers: Donald Oberacker, ORD
William B. Kuykendal, OAQPS
16. ABSTRACT
'?he Environmental Protection Agency is assessing the potential for the emissions
of diuxin/furans from combustion sources under Tier 4 of the National Dioxin Study. If
any of the combustion sources are found to emit dioxins, the secondary purpose of the
Tier study is to quantify these emissions and, if possible, related the emissions to
combu:.tion parameters.
Carbon regeneration furnaces are 1 of 8 source categories that have been included
in the field test program. Carbon regeneration furnaces reactive spent carbon from
industrial or municipal water treatment facilities. The spent carbon may contain
adsorbed chlorinated compounds.
This report presents the results of an emission test program conducted by Radian
during May 28-31, 1985, at an industrial carbon regeneration furnace designated as Site
CRF-A. The furnace was selected after an initial information screening and a pretest
survey visit. This facility is considered representative of other carbon regeneration
furnaces in the United States. Furnace CRF-A regenerates spent carbon from more than
20 plants that use activated carbon for industrial wastewater treatment.
Data presented icr the report include dioxin (tetra through octa homologue +2378
TCDD) and furan (tetra through octa homologue +2378 TCDF) results for both stack samples
and ash samples. In addition, process data collected during sampling are also
presented.
17. KEY WORDS ANO OOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATl Field/Croup
Air Emissions
Combustion Sources
Dioxin
Furans
2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Carbon Regeneration Furnace
Air Pollution Emissions
Data
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
312
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Potm 2220.1 (R«v. 4—77) previous edition is obsouete
------- |