United States	Office of Air Quality	Office of
Environmental Protection	Planning and Standards	Research and Development
Agency	RTP, NC 27711	Cincinnati OH 45268
Technology Transfer	CERI 90-124a	December 1990
SEPA Workshop -
Organic Air
Emissions from
Waste Management
Facilities
Speaker Slide Copies and
Supporting Information
Volume 1
EPA Workshop
Organic Air Emissions From
Waste Management Facilities
Brian
Mitchell
U.S. EPA

-------
ORGANIC AIR EMISSIONS FROM WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
December 1990
Document Prepared by
PEER Consultants, P.C.
Dayton, OH 45432
and
Slides and Presentations Prepared by
Research Triangle Institute
RTP, NC 27709
for
Office of Research and Development
Cincinnati, OH 45268
and
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
RTP, NC 27711
Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
NOTICE
This document is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally released by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and should not at this stage be
construed to represent Agency policy. Mention of trade names or commercial
products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Notice		ii
Abbreviation Index 		iv
Section 1
Air Pollution Overview		1-1
Abstract		1-2
Slides		1-3
Section 2
Sources and Controls	2-1
Abstract	2-2
Bibliography 		2-3
Slides	2-4
Section 3
RCRA Organic Air Rules - Process Vents	3-1
Abstract	3-2
Bibliography 		3-3
Slides	3-4
Attachments	3-18
Section 4
Equipment Leak Standards 		4-1
Abstract	4-2
Bibliography	4-3
SI ides		4-4
Section 5
Phase II Air Rules	5-1
Abstract	5-2
Slides	5-3
Appendix A
RCRA Overview	A-l
Slides	A-2
Appendix B
Case Study: Measuring and Estimating Emissions 		B-l
Slides	B-2
Appendix C
Case Study: Equipment Leaks Testing—U.S. EPA Method 21 		C-l
Slides	C-2
Appendix D
Case Study: Computerized Emissions Models 		D-l
Slides	D-2
Appendix E
Case Study: Process Vent Rule Applicability and Compliance 		E-l
Slides	E-2
Appendix F
Case Study: Application of Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP to
Wastewater Treatment Systems 		F-l
Slides		F-2
Appendix G
Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP 		G-l
Slides	G-2
iii

-------
ABBREVIATION INDEX
ACT	Alternative Control Techniques Document
API	American Petroleum Institute
ARAR	Applicable, Relevant, and Appropriate Requirements
ASTM	American Society for Testing and Materials
ASTSWMO	Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials
Atm	Atmosphere
BDAT	Best Demonstrated Available Technology
Btu	British Thermal Units
BZ	Benzene
ฐC	Celsius
CAA	Clean Air Act
CERCLA	Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (Superfund)
CERI	Center for Environmental Research Information
CFC	Chlorofluorocarbons
cfm	Cubic Feet per Minute
CFR	Code of Federal Regulations
OPI	Corrugated Plate Interceptor
CTG	Control Techniques Guideline Document
CWA	Clean Water Act
DOT	Department of Transportation
DRE	Destruction and Removal Efficiency
dscm	Dry Standard Cubic Meter
EDC	Ethylene Dichloride
iv

-------
EP	Extraction Procedure
EPA	United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESD	Emission Standards Division
ER	Emission Rate
FID	Flame Ionization Detector
FR	Federal Register
ft	Feet
gal	Gallon
GC	Gas Chromatography
h	Hours
HAP	Hazardous Air Pollutant
HLC	Henry's Law Constant
HON	Hazardous Organic NESHAP
HSWA	Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
HWMU	Hazardous Waste Management Unit
IR	Infrared
kg	Kilograms
kPa	Kilopascal
L	Liters
lb	Pounds
LDAR	Leak Detection and Repair
LDR	Land Disposal Restrictio ns
m^	Cubic Meters
Mg	Megagrams
v

-------
MS	Mass Spectrometry
MW	Megawatts
NAAQS	National Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAA)
NAPCTAC	National Air Pollution Control Techniques Advisory Committee
NCP	National Contingency Plan (CERCLA)
NESHAP	National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (CAA)
NPDES	National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (CWA)
NSPS	New Source Performance Standards (CAA)
OAQPS	Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
OAR	Office of Air and Radiation
ORD	Office of Research and Development
o/o	Owner/Operator
OSW	Office of Solid Waste
OSWER	Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
PCB	Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PM	Particulate Matter
POTW	Publicly Owned Treatment Works
ppm	Parts per Million
ppmv	Parts per Million by Volume
ppmw	Parts per Million by Weight
psia	Pounds per Square Inch Absolute
psig	Pounds per Square Inch Gauge
RAC	Reference Air Concentration
RACT	Reasonably Available Control Technology
RCRA	Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
vi

-------
s	Seconds
SARA	Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
scf	Standard Cubic Feet
scfm	Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
SIC	Standard Industrial Classification
SIP	State Implementation Plan
SOCMI	Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry
SW	Solid Waste
SWMU	Solid Waste Management Unit
TAB	Total Annual Benzene-in-Waste
TCLP	Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure
TFE	Thin-Film Evaporation
TOC	Total Organic Carbon
TRS	Total Reduced Sulfur
TSDF	Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (RCRA)
UV	Ultraviolet
VO	Volatile Organic
VOC	Volatile Organic Compounds
VOL	Volatile Organic Liquid
WWT	Wastewater Treatment
WWTS	Wastewater Treatment System
yr	Year
vii

-------
AIR POLLUTION OVERVIEW
1-1

-------
ABSTRACT: AIR POLLUTION OVERVIEW
The introductory session provides a broad overview of the need to
control organic air emissions. Human health and environmental problems
caused by organic air emissions or to which organic air emissions contribute
are discussed. Major problems discussed are those resulting from
troposheric ozone formation and exposure to air toxics. Other problems
discussed include stratospheric ozone depletion, global climate change, and
acid rain. The statutory mechanisms under which organic air emissions are
regulated are discussed with emphasis on the Clean Air Act and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The specific rules that apply to
waste management operations and that are the focus of the workshop are
introduced. These are the rules developed by EPA under RCRA Section 3004(n)
that apply to RCRA-permitted hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal
facilities (TSDF), and the rule promulgated under Section 112 of the Clean
Air Act that limits emissions from benzene waste operations.
1-2

-------
n
Air Emissions From Waste
Management Operations
Focus of This
Workshop
•	Organic Gaseous Emissions
•	Inorganic Gaseous Emissions
•	Particulate Emissions
7_A
AIR POLLUTION OVERVIEW

OUTLINE OF THIS PRESENTATION
•
Problems caused by organic air emissions
•
Magnitude of the problems and contribution

of waste management operations
•
Federal laws that address organic emissions
WHY BE CONCERNED ABOUT
ORGANIC AIR EMISSIONS?
1-3

-------
ORGANIC AIR EMISSIONS
MAJOR CONCERNS
#	OZONE
•	AIR TOXICS

-rrrrrrm^
OZONE IN THE ATMOSPHERE
SOLAR \
RADIATION /

:T - r

TROPOSPHERIC OZONE
1 rwjMijiimi
# STRATOSPHERIC OZONE ("GOOD OZONE") PROVIDES PROTECTION
FROM THE SUN'S RADIATION
• TROPOSPHERIC OZONE ("BAD OZONE") IS DETRIMENTAL TO HUMAN
HEALTH AND WELFARE
So4ar
Radiation
TROPOSPHERIC
OZONE FORMATION

-------
HEALTH EFFECTS OF OZONE
Acute Effects
Chronic Effects
• Inflammation of the lung
• Increased susceptibility
• Impaired breathing
to respiratory infection
• Coughing
• Permanent damage to
• Chest pain
lung tissues and
breathing capacity
• Nausea

• Throat irritation

(PHOTOGRAPH OF LUNG FROM 19 YEAR OLD
ACCIDENT VICTIM IN LOS ANGELES SHOWING
LUNG DAMAGE POSSIBLY DUE TO OZONE EXPOSURE)

WELFARE EFFECTS OF OZONE
•
Materials damage due to oxidation
•
Reduction in crop yields
•
Lower forest growth rate and premature
leaf-drop
•
$2 - 3 billion annual damage to commercial
crops and forests
1-5

-------
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE - MAGNITUDE OF
THE PROBLEM
•	NAAQS for ozone is 0.12 ppm
•	NAAQS routinely exceeded in more than
60 areas nationwide
•	Over 100 million people live in areas
exceeding NAAQS
•	Some areas may not attain standard for
next 30 years
•	Some scientists are calling for a more
stringent standard
SOURCES OF NATIONWIDE VOC EMISSIONS
Surtace Coating 14%
Petroleum Marketing 10%
Petroleum Refining 3%
1-6

-------
AIR TOXICS - WHAT ARE THEY?
•	Air pollutants that cause cancer or other
human health effects
•	Clean Air Act amendments identify 189
compounds
•	Thousands of point and area sources
AIR TOXICS - HEALTH EFFECTS
•	Occur due to acute or chronic exposure
•	Effects:
-	Neurological
-	Behavioral
-	Reproductive
-	Cancer
AIR TOXICS - MAGNITUDE OF THE
PROBLEM
•	During 1987, major U.S. industries
estimated releases of 2.4 billion pounds
of toxic pollutants to the air (SARA 313)
•	Air toxics are estimated to account for
1,600 to 3,000 cancer deaths per year
•	Estimates of the average urban
individual lifetime cancer risk from
toxic air pollution are as high as 1 in 1000
1-7

-------
Top Fourteen VOC/HAP Chemicals
Mass Emissions Basis
ฆ
Toluane gg
ฉ•Xylene
~
Formaldehyde gg
Perchloioethylene
a.
Meihytero chloride
p-Xytene
s
Melhyl chloroform Q
Chiorobenzene
m
Ethylene gj
Acetic acid
HI
m-Xytone |g]
TrichlorolrifTuoroethylene
~
Benzene ฃ51
TrichCoroethytene
ESTIMATED CANCER IMPACTS OF TSDF
AIR EMISSIONS
•	140 cancer incidences per year nationwide
.2
•	Maximum individual risk of cancer = 2X10
ORGANIC AIR EMISSIONS
OTHER CONCERNS
•	GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
•	ACIO RAIN
1-8

-------
FEDERAL LAWS THAT ADDRESS THE
PROBLEM
•	RCRA/HSWA
•	CLEAN AIR ACT
•	CERCLA/SARA
ป
FEDERAL LAWS
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY
ACT (RCRA)
•	Section 3004(n)
•	Corrective Action
•	Land Disposal Restrictions
•	Other Programs
STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT UNDER SECTION 3004(n)
PHASE 1
- Total organics

- Process vents and equipment leaks

- Promulgated 6/21/90 (55 FR 25454)
PHASE II
- Total organics

- Tanks, surface Impoundments, containers

and miscellaneous units

- Proposal package in OMB
PHASE III
- Individual constituent standards, as needed, to

supplement Phase I and Phase II standards

- Early Work Group stage
1-9

-------
WASTE
GENERATION
90-DAY
TANKS
WASTE HANDLING
AND TREATMENT













TREATMENT
UNITS
e.g.
Steam
Stripper
i'
i&t
CONTAINERS 1)001
M 8?
TANKS & SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
WASTE
DISPOSAL
LAND
^DISPOSAL
UNITS
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
I'll ASK I
PROCESS \ ENT
STANDARDS
TREATMENT
UNITS
I'llASE 2
EMISSION
STANDAKDS
90-DAY

-------
h tULRAL LAW'S
CLEAN AIR ACT
•	National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
-	Criteria pollutants
-	PM, S02, CO, NOx, 03,Pb
•	New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
-	Criteria pollutants
-	Designated pollutants (e.g. TRS)
•	National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP)
National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants; Benzene Waste Operations
•	Promulgated March 7,1990 (55 FR 8292)
•	40 CFR Part 61 Subpart FF
•	Applies to chemical plants, petroleum
refineries, coke by-product recovery
plants, and certain TSDF
•	Compliance deadline for existing facilities:
March 7,1992
How can we get
more Information on
the Benzene Waste
NESHAP?
Attend a Case Studyl
•	Benzene Waste Rule
•	Wastewater Treatment Systems
•	Implementation Discussion
(regulators only, please)
1-11

-------
FEDERAL LAWS
CERCLA/SARA
(Superfund)
•	Site-specific risk analysis required for
removal and remediation actions
•	Removal and remediation actions must comply
with Federal and State laws that are
applicable or relevant and appropriate (ARARS)
•	Toxic Release Inventory Required by
SARA Title 313
OVERLAP OF STATUTORY COVERAGE FOR
AIR EMISSION SOURCES
Clean Air
Act
3004(n)
- Waste
treatment
standard
NSPS
NESHAP
-SIP
RCRA
• Control requirements consistent and complimentary to
the extent possible
• Compliance must be demonstrated with all applicable
rules
1-12

-------
'ragefC-
Benzene
Waste
NESHAP
RCRA
3004(n)
Phase II
VOL
Storage
NSPS
STORAGE TANKS ARE UNDER SEVERAL
"REGULATORY UMBRELLAS"
CONCLUSIONS
•	Organic air emissions contribute to major air
pollution problems
•	Waste management operations are a significant
source of organic air emissions
•	Organic air emissions are being controlled
under several federal laws
1-13

-------
SEPA
SOURCES AND
CONTROLS
2-1

-------
ABSTRACT: SOURCES AND CONTROLS
The session on sources and controls focuses on the major sources of air
emissions at waste management facilities, how these emissions occur, and how
they can be controlled. The major sources that are discussed in detail include
surface impoundments, the very broad and diverse category of tanks and
ancillary equipment, containers, and other major land disposal sources. As each
source is described, controls that are inherent to that source or commonly
found on that particular source are presented. In addition, details are provided
on the basic mechanisms by which emissions occur and the major factors that
affect the emissions.
After the discussion of sources and their inherent controls, air pollution
control devices that may be generally applicable to any enclosed or vented
source (i.e., add-on controls) are described. The discussion of control devices
focuses on their applicability, control performance, and the major factors
affecting performance. Organic removal (i.e., pretreatment) and destruction
processes are also discussed as a means for controlling air emissions and
reducing or eliminating the emission potential. This discussion describes
processes that remove or destroy the organics in the waste, which may
eliminate the need to control subsequent waste processing steps.
2-2

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
SOURCES AND CONTROLS
1.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities (TSDF) -- Background Information for Promulgated
Organic Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks."
EPA-450/3-89-009. July 1990.
2.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste TSDF - Technical Guidance Document
for RCRA Air Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment
Leaks." EPA-450/3-89-21. July 1990.
3.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Alternative Control Technology Document - Organic
Waste Process Vents" to be published 1n December 1990.
4.	U.S. EPA, AEERL. "Handbook: Control Technologies for Hazardous Air
Pollutants". EPA/625/6-86/014. September 1986.
5.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater
Systems -- Background Information for Proposed Standards."
EPA-450/3-85-001a. February 1985.
6.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities (TSDF) - Air Emission Models." EPA-450/3-87-026.
November 1989.
7.	U.S. EPA, ORD/HWERL. "Preliminary Assessment of Hazardous Waste
Pretreatment as an Air Pollution Control Technique."
EPA-600/2-86-028. NTIS PB46-17209/A6. March 1986.
8.	U.S. EPA, Control Technology Center. "Industrial Wastewater Volatile
Organic Compound Emissions -- Background Information for BACT/LAER
Determinations." EPA-450/3-90-004. January 1990.
9.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste TSDF -- Background Information
Document for Proposed RCRA Air Emission Standards."
EPA-450/3-89-23. (Will be available to the public upon proposal
of the standard.)
2-3

-------

Highlights
•
Open sources with large surface areas have high emission
potential
•
Aeration, agitation, heating increase emissions
•
Tanks are a diverse group of sources
•
Sources can be covered and enclosed, vented to a control
device
•
Organic removal or waste destruction is the best control
option
Outline
•	Introduction
•	Sources and inherent controls
•	Air pollution control devices
•	Organic removal or destruction
•	Summary
Introduction
•	Sources
—	Impoundments — Containers
—	Tanks	— Land disposal sources
•	Emission mechanisms
•	Emission controls
2-4

-------
Outline
•	Introduction
•	Sources and inherent controls
•	Air pollution control devices
•	Organic removal or destruction
•	Summary
Sources and Inherent Controls
•	Surface impoundments
•	Tanks and ancillary equipment
•	Containers
•	Land disposal sources
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
Definition
.. depression, manmade excavation, or diked
area formed primarily of earthen materials ...
designed to hold liquid wastes or wastes
containing free liquids..."
2-5

-------
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
Uses
•	Storage
•	Equalization
•	Neutralization
•	Evaporation
•	Solids settling
•	Biodegradation
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
A High Percentage of Organics Is
Emitted because of...
•	Surface areas up to many acres
•	Residence times of days, weeks, or months
•	Aeration or agitation
Emissions from Impoundments arid

Other Open Liquid Surfaces


From Surface K> Air
WlTrd ป 	1
..yifLI:/,/ -...

Flow In m
Him
* Row Oin

D fluston Through Liquid




2-6

-------
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
Major Factors Affecting Emissions
•	Constituent volatility
•	Residence time
•	Surface area
•	Turbulence (aeration, agitation)
•	Windspeed and temperature
•	Extent of competing mechanisms
(such as biodegradation)
Fate of Organics: Emissions,
Effluent, Biodegradation, Sludge
Emissions
			
— Flow Out
Biodegradation





Sludge


- Sludge Out
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
Models for Open Liquid Surfaces
•	Applicable to impoundments and open tanks
•	Models for calm surfaces and turbulent surfaces
•	Emissions modeled as two steps
•	Models for flowthrough systems and evaporation
ponds
•	Rate of biodegradation (if any) included
2-7

-------
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS

Controls:
Air-supported Structures
•
Fans maintain pressure to inflate structure
•
Air vented to a control device
•
Demonstrated on 1-acre aerated lagoon
•
Subject to condensation, high temperatures,
accelerated corrosion, special worker salety
procedures
•
Control efficiency determined by vent's
control device (over 95%)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
j
Controls:
Floating Membrane Covers
•	Demonstrated on water reservoirs, anaerobic
digester
•	Design considerations: seal at edges, removal
of rainwater, gas vents, sludge removal
•	Emissions from organic permeation of membrane
•	Control efficiency (theoretical) of 50% to 95+%
Sources and Inherent Controls
•	Surface impoundments
•	Tanks and ancillary equipment
•	Containers
•	Land disposal sources
2-8

-------
TANKS

Highlights
•
Diverse group of sources
•
Open tanks have high emission potential
•
Heating, agitation, aeration increase emissions
•
Biodegradation decreases emissions
•
Some have inherent controls
•
Control by covering, enclosing, venting to control
device
TANKS
Definition
.. stationary device designed to contain an
accumulation of hazardous waste which is
constructed primarily of nonearthen materials
which provide structural support."
TANKS
Definitions
Tank system:
. a tank and its associated ancillary
equipment
Ancillary equipment:
.. such devices as piping, fittings, flanges,
valves, and pumps
2-9

-------
TANKS
Categories
I.	Organic liquids
II.	Aqueous wastes (wastewater)
III.	Sludges
IV.	Ancillary equipment
TANKS
I. Organic Liquids
•	Covered storage tanks
•	Distillation (solvent recovery)
•	Solvent extraction
TANKS


Organic Liquids:

Covered Tanks



• Fixed-roof

• Floating roof

• Pressure tanks
2-10

-------
TANKS
Fixed-Roof
•	Common for hazardous waste storage, especially
organic liquids
•	Emissions through roof's vent equipped with:
—	Vent pipe open to atmosphere
—	Pressure/vacuum relief valve
—	Air pollution control device
Typical Fixed-Roof Tank
Pr
-------
Covered Tanks (Working Losses)
Working Losses
' Due to Loading
Vapor Space
New Liquid Level
Volume ol
Displaced
Vapors
Original Liquid Level
Liquid In
Covered Tanks (Breathing Losses)
Breathing losses due to
ambient pressure and
temperature fluctuations
Vapor phase concentration
in equilibrium with
waste liquid
— Volume in
vapor space increases
TANKS
Emission Models for Fixed-Roof Tanks
•	Working loss = waste volume x vapor concentration
•	Concentration in vapor
—	Measure, or
—	Estimate from volatility
•	Breathing losses: low compared to working losses
•	Constant level: low working losses
2-12

-------
TANKS
Fixed-Roof Tanks as a Control
•	Retrofit open tank, replace impoundment
•	86% to 99% control for open tank
•	20% to 45% more control with pressure-
relief device at 2.5 psig (uncommon)
TANKS

Floating Roof
•
Common at petroleum refineries, gasoline marketing
•
Can be internal or external
•
Reduces vapor displacement
•
Emissions from "standing losses" and "withdrawal
losses"
External Floating Roof Tank
Seal Envelope
Pontoon Manhole
I 4
Primary
Shoe
Seal
Drain Pipe
2-13

-------
TANKS
Floating Roof as an
Emission Control
•
Retrofit open tank, fixed-roof tank
•
Must be compatible with waste, process, tank
•
93% to 97% retrofitting fixed-roof
(large tanks, organic liquids)
•
74% to 82% reduction for fixed-roof
(various types of wastes)
•
96% to 99% reduction for open tank
TANKS
Pressure Tanks
•	Most fixed roofs at atmospheric pressure; some
up to 2.5 psig, which provides 20% to 45% control
of emissions
•	Low-pressure tanks up to 2 atm, high-pressure
greater than 2 atm
•	Vapors generally contained, except when pressure-
vacuum relief valve opens
TANKS
Organic Liquids: Distillation
•	Separation based on differences in volatility of
components
•	Continuous or batch (most common at TSDF)
•	At atmospheric pressure, vacuum, or greater than
atmospheric pressure
2-14

-------
TANKS
Emissions from Distillation
•	Emissions through overhead system vent, collection
tank vents, vacuum system
•	Primary condenser is an inherent control
•	Pollution control devices can be added to vents
Condenser
Still
Receiver
Waste
Emission Sources for Distillation
Vapors
Residual
Out
Vent
Vent
TANKS
Organic Liquids:
Solvent Extraction
•	Constituent preferentially dissolves in solvent
•	Extract separated from treated waste
•	Solvent in extract recovered by distillation
•	Emissions from distillation vents
2-15

-------
TANKS
II. Aqueous Wastes (Wastewater)
•	Wastewater collection
•	Oil-water separators
•	Open wastewater treatment tanks
•	Air and steam strippers
Emissions from Solvent Extraction
Solvent
Waste Residua! Out
Extracted
Emissions Organlcs
Extracted Orqanlcs
and Solvent
Solvent
Recycle
Distillation
Waste
Solvent
Extractor
TANKS


Solvent Extraction:

Uses
•
Used for phenol, acetic acid, hydroxy aromatic

acids, petroleum oils
•
Also applicable for organic sludges
•
Removals of 80% to 100%
•
Waste residual usually requires more treatment
2-16

-------
TANKS
Wastewater Collection Systems
•	Individual drains, sewers, junction boxes, sumps
•	Emissions from direct contact with air, induced
draft
•	Roughly 20% to 40% of benzene can be emitted
in collection systems
•	Control by covering, vent to control device
Individual Drains
]
777
jr- Drain Pipe
y Drain Riser
7777777777771
Sewer Pipe
Cross
Section
Open, Unsealed
1
7777"
Drain Pipe
Drain Riser
77777771777]
P-Leg Seal
y
7777777
Drain Pipe
^ Drain Riser
7777777
Closed Drain
Typical Junction Box
Vent	Gas Tight Cover
S	Grade
TTTT
TT,
:;v^T

TTTTTT71
Concrete
1
Water
2-17

-------
TANKS
Oil-Water Separators
•	May be open, covered, or controlled by
covering and venting to control device
•	API and PPI separators common at refineries
•	Separates oil, water, and sludge
Oil-Water Separator
Emissions
Emissions
Oily
Wastewater




Forebay

Separator
—
Oil
Water
Sludge
TANKS

Wastewater Treatment
•
Generally open
•
Emission mechanisms similar to impoundments
•
Smaller surface areas than impoundments
•
Residence time of hours
•
Control by covering, vent to a control device
2-18

-------
TANKS
Typical Open Tank Processes
Equalization	•	Oxidation reactions
Neutralization	•	Precipitation
Solids settling, separation	•	Adsorption
Biodegradation	•	Air flotation
TANKS

Air Stripping
e
Volatiles stripped from waste by contact with air
•
Contact in spray towers, packed towers, mechanical

and diffused-air aeration
e
Most common for dilute aqueous wastes; used for

groundwater
e
Vented air controlled by carbon adsorption,

catalytic incineration (condensers are uncommon)
Schematic Diagram of an Air Stripping System
Overhead Vapors
Vented
Air
Feed
Liquid Distributor
Vent
Control Device Residua
(e.g., ipent carbon)
Packed
Column
Alt
Stripper
H5~
Pump
Air
Effluent
Storage
ind Feed
Tank
Control Device
2-19

-------
TANKS
Steam Stripping
•	Batch or continuous (most common for large
wastewater streams)
•	Direct contact between steam and waste
•	Vapors condensed and organic layer decanted;
aqueous layer recycled to feed
•	Continuous devices with trays or packing require
low solids content
Steam Stripper for Ethylene
Dichloride/Vinyl Chloride
To WWT
Condensers
/ \
Feed
Waste
Heat
Exchanger
Ah
-0 w
Steam
Stripper
To
Incinerator
Steam
Bottoms
. Water to
teed tank
EDC
Preliminary Treatment
Prior to Stripping
Additives Vent
1 t
Wastewater —~
Decanter
, Decanted
Water

v
—*- Organics

Sludge

2-20

-------
TANKS
Emissions from Steam Stripping
•	Emissions from condenser/decanter vent, collection tanks
•	Primary condenser provides an inherent control
•	Additional control from control devices on vents
TANKS
III. Sludges
•	Fixation
•	Dewatering
•	Thin-film evaporators
TANKS


Sludges: Fixation
•
Also called stabilization, solidification
•
Cement-like substances (lime, flyash, kiln dust)

most common fixative
•
Steps are (1) mixing, (2) curing, and (3) disposal
•
Not only in tanks, but also containers (next

source type)
2-21

-------
TANKS


Emissions from Fixation
•
Most volatiles emitted during mixing

(60% to 90%)
•
Organics also emitted during curing
•
Exothermic reactions increase emissions
•
Control by covers or enclosures vented to

control device
tanks


Sludges: Dewatering
•
Used to reduce water content of sludges
•
Filter press

— Plate and frame

— Recessed plate

— Belt filter
•
Rotary vacuum filter
•
Centrifugal filter
Belt Filter Press
Press Belt
DHve
Rollers
Scraper
Flier Belt'
Press Zone
2-22

-------
TANKS


Emissions from Dewatering
•
Discharge of solids and filtrate
•
Exposed area of waste on moving belts
•
Leaks
•
Vacuum pumps (if used)
•
Control by enclosure vented to control device
TANKS
Sludges: Thin-Film Evaporation
•	For viscous liquids, sludges, slurries
•	Thin layer of waste spread on heated surface
•	Adaptable to many physical forms and waste
compositions
Flow Path of
Thin-Film Evaporator
Product OuiUi
2-23

-------
TANKS
Emissions from Thin-Film Evaporation
•	Emissions through overhead system vents,
collection tanks, vacuum system if used
•	Primary condenser is an inherent control
•	Additional control from control devices on vents
	
TANKS
IV. Ancillary Equipment
•	Pumps	• Compressors
•	Valves	• Sampling connections
•	Pressure-relief devices • Open-ended lines
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT
Leak Detection and
Repair (LDAR)
•	Procedure to reduce emissions
•	Survey components for leaks using
portable organic vapor detector (Method 21)
•	Adjust, repair, replace as necessary
2-24

-------
Sources and Inherent Controls
•	Surface impoundments
•	Tanks and ancillary equipment
•	Containers
•	Land disposal sources
CONTAINERS
Definition
"Any portable device in which a material is
stored, transported, treated, disposed of,
or otherwise handled."
CONTAINERS
Controls
•	Submerged loading
—	Influent pipe below surface
—	Prevents splashing, saturation of vapors
—	Control efficiency of 65%
•	Cover or enclose and vent to a control device
•	Housekeeping in drum storage area
2-25

-------
Splash Loading
(tends to saturate vapors)
Fill Pipe
Hatch Cover
Vapo' Emissions
Cargo Tank
vapors
Product
Submerged Loading
nil Pipe
Hatch Cover
Vapor Emissions
Cargo Tank
vapors
Product
Bottom Loading
Vapor Vent
To Recovery
or Atmosphere
Hatch Closed
Vapors
vRfOdjCt:
Sources and Inherent Controls
•	Surface impoundments
•	Tanks and ancillary equipment
•	Containers
•	Land disposal sources
2-26

-------
LAND DISPOSAL


Major Land

Disposal Sources

• Land treatment

• Landfills

• Waste piles
LAND DISPOSAL
Land Treatment
"... hazardous waste is applied onto or
incorporated into the soil surface."
Land Treatment Emission Mechanisms
Diffusion
' through pores
Wind
ISoil or other solids
Adsorption
onto soil particles
Biodegradatlon,
If any
Absorption
into oil and water
2-27

-------
LAND DISPOSAL
Landfills
•
Composed of active and covered cells
•
Volatiles rapidly emitted from surface of
active cells
•
After covering and compacting with soil,
emissions occur by diffusion, barometric
pumping, gas venting
Emissions From A Closed Landfill
Convectlve loss from
barometric pumping
Diffusion through the cap	*#" through the vent.
Landfllled Waste
LAND DISPOSAL
Wastepile
"Noncontainerized accumulation of solid,
nonflowing hazardous waste used for
treatment or storage."
2-28

-------
LAND DISPOSAL
Controls
•	Flexible membrane covers
•	Covers supported by rigid structure, vent to control
device
•	Air-supported structures, vent to control device
•	Remove or destroy organics before disposal
Outline
•	Introduction
•	Sources and inherent controls
•	Air pollution control devices
•	Organic removal or destruction
•	Summary
Air Pollution Control Devices
•	Carbon adsorption
•	Condensation
•	Absorption
•	Combustion
—	Flares
—	Thermal incineration
—	Catalytic incineration
—	Boilers or process heaters
2-29

-------
CONTROL DEVICES

Carbon Adsorbers
•
Organics selectively collected on surface of
activated carbon
•
Breakthrough: organics detected exiting the bed
•
Essentially complete removal until breakthrough
•
Efficiency at least 95%
•
Carbon canisters and fixed bed (regenerable)
Carbon Canisters
For vent flows less than 100 CFM
Cannot be regenerated in canister
Activated Carbon
. Support Material
Two-stage Adsorption System
Vapors
Open
Closed
Steam

*>
Adsorbing
Vapors
Desorbing
—>ฆ Vent
to Atmosphere
Steam

To Condenser
and Separator
2-30

-------
CONTROL DEVICES
Carbon Adsorbers:
Design Considerations
•	Capacity vs. vapor concentration
•	Bed design (depth, pressure drop)
•	Flow rate
•	Humidity
•	Temperature
CONTROL DEVICES
For Effective Control
by Adsorbers ...
•	Monitor tor breakthrough, or
•	Replace carbon before breakthrough
(based on operating experience)
•	Control emissions from regeneration
or disposal
CONTROL DEVICES

Condensation
•
Cool vapor phase to dewpoint
•
Surface condenser - most common, noncontact
(usually shell and tube)
•
Contact condensers: cheap and efficient, but
could have a treatment and disposal problem
•
Coolants: cooling tower water, refrigerated
water, brines, glycols
•
Efficiency determined by vapor phase concentration
and condenser temperature
2-31

-------
Schematic Diagram of a Shell-and-Tube
Surface Condenser
Coolant Inlet	Vapor Outlet
Vapor Inlet
Cooling Tower or
Refrigeration Unit
Coolant Outlet
Condensed VOC
(to decanter or receiving tank)
Schematic Diagram of a Contact Condenser
Vapor Outlet
Vapor Inlet
- V -
' V V - -
/ 
-------
Packed Tower for Gas Absorption
Absorbing
Liquid In
lililllfi
Packing Support
Cleaned Gas Out
to Final Control
Device
. Organic Laden
Gas In
Absorbing Liquid
with Organics Out
To Disposal or Organic Solvent Recovery
CONTROL DEVICES
Combustion Equipment
•	Flares
•	Thermal oxidizers (incinerators, boilers,
process heaters)
•	Catalytic incinerators
CONTROL DEVICES
Flares
•	Open combustion process
•	Steam injection improves combustion
•	Destruction efficiency at least 98%
2-33

-------
Steam-assisted Elevated Flare System
. Pilot
burners
Steam
nozzles
Gas	
barriers
Helps prevent flashback
Flare _
stack'
	 Steam
line
Gas collection headerp
and
transfer line
X Purge
oas
Air line
Gas line
Knock-oul
drum
Water
seal
Drain
CONTROL DEVICES
Thermal Incineration
Requires high temperatures, good mixing,
sufficient oxygen, adequate residence time
Auxiliary fuel if vent gas less than
50 Btu/scf
Capacity of 200 to 500,000 scfm
Destruction efficiency at least 98%
Thermal Incinerator
Waste Gas
Auxiliary
Fuel Burner
(discrete)
Optional
Heat
Recovery
Combustion
2-34

-------
CONTROL DEVICES
Catalytic Incinerators
•	Oxidation at lower temperatures with catalyst
(320 - 650 ฐC)
•	Catalyst adversely affected by high temperatures,
high concentrations, fouling (particulate matter,
polymers),deactivation (halogens or some metals)
•	Can achieve 98% or higher destruction
Catalytic Oxidizer
Suck
Fซn
CONTROL DEVICES
Existing Boilers or Process Heaters
•	Control provided by existing equipment
•	Vent stream added as fuel, secondary combustion
air, or as diluent
•	Vapors with halogens or sulfur usually avoided
•	Recovers heating value of vent stream
•	Can achieve 98% or higher destruction
2-35

-------
Outline
•	Introduction
•	Sources and inherent controls
•	Air pollution control devices
•	Organic removal or destruction
•	Summary
Organic Removal
or Destruction
• Steam stripping
• Solvent extraction
• Air stripping
• Distillation
• Thin-film evaporation
• Waste incineration
ORGANIC REMOVAL

Features
•
Avoids need for controls on subsequent
processes (hence pretreatment)
•
Removal efficiency depends on waste
constituents and process design
•
Can remove essentially all of highly volatile
compounds
•
Applicable to many wastes and compounds
2-36

-------
ORGANIC REMOVAL
Control Efficiency
•	Percent removed from waste
•	Emissions from removal process
•	Emissions before removal process installed
•	Percent control of 98 to 99+ is possible
ORGANIC REMOVAL
Example:
Steam Stripping Benzene from Water
•	99.5% to 99.9% removed from water
•	0.7% to 1.4% emitted from stripping system
•	Control efficiency of 98% to 99% (if 70%
emitted in WWT)
ORGANIC DESTRUCTION
Waste Incineration
•	Used for wastes that were previously land-disposed
•	Destruction of 99.99% or higher demonstrated
in many units
•	Applicable to organic wastes and sludges
		i
2-37

-------
Outline
•	Introduction
•	Sources and inherent controls
•	Air pollution control devices
•	Organic removal or destruction
•	Summary
SUMMARY
SOURCES
•	Impoundments
•	Tanks
•	Containers
•	Land disposal sources
SUMMARY


Characteristics

Affecting Emissions

• Exposed surface areas

• Residence time

ซ Constituent volatility

• Turbulence
2-38

-------
SUMMARY
Emission Mechanisms
• Area sources
—	Diffusion through waste to surface
—	Transfer from surface to air
SUMMARY
Emission Mechanisms (con.)
•	Enclosed sources
-	Vapor space contains organics
-	Displacement of vapor
Working losses
Breathing losses
•	Evaporation of leaks and spills
2-39

-------
SUMMARY


Competing Mechanisms

• Biodegradation

• Adsorption

• Absorption

• Removal with effluent
SUMMARY
Controls
•
Cover or enclose open area sources
•
Control devices for vapors captured by enclosure
•
Organic removal or waste incineration
(instead of covers/control devices)
•
Work practices for leaks (LDAR) and spills
2-40

-------
RCRA Organic Air Rules - Process Vents
40 CFR Parts 264 and 265
Subpart AA
(55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990)

-------
ABSTRACT: PROCESS VENT STANDARDS (SUBPART AA)
The objective of the presentation on the RCRA process vent rules is to
provide a basic understanding of the new RCRA air emission standards for
process vents in order that those persons required to comply, implement, or
enforce the rules can do so effectively and timely. The presentation clearly
explains the process vent rule applicability criteria which include facility
authorization under RCRA, hazardous waste management unit type, and waste
organic concentration. Technical requirements for emission controls and the
facility "bubble" concept for emission rate limits are explained. Recordkeeping
and reporting requirements are also discussed.
The process vent standards in 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265, Subpart AA, limit
organic air emissions at hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDF) requiring a permit under Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The standards were promulgated on
June 21, 1990 (55 FR 25454) under the authority of Section 3004(n) of the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the RCRA. The Subpart AA
standards are applicable to process vents associated with distillation,
fractionation, thin-film evaporation, solvent extraction, and air and steam
stripping operations that manage hazardous wastes with 10 parts per million by
weight (ppmw) or greater total organic concentration. The RCRA air rules for
process vents require that owners/operators of TSDFs subject to the provisions
of Subpart AA: (1) reduce total organic emissions from all affected process
vents at the facility to below 1.4 kg/h (3 lb/h) and 2.8 Mg/yr (3.1 ton/yr), or
(2) install and operate a control device(s) that reduces total organic emissions
from all affected process vents at the facility by 95 weight percent. The
process vent rules do not require use of any specific types of equipment or
add-on control devices. Condensers, carbon adsorbers, incinerators, and flares
are demonstrated emission control technologies for the regulated processes,
although the choice of control is not limited to these. To ensure that control
devices perform according to their design, the rules for process vents require
that specific control device operating parameters be monitored continuously
and the monitoring information be recorded in the facility operating record.
3-2

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.	"Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities -- Organic
Air Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks."
Federal Register, Vol. 55 pages 25454-25519. June 21, 1990.
2.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS, "Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities (TSDF) -- Background Information for Promulgated Organic
Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks,"
EPA-450/3-89-009, July 1990.
3.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste TSDF - Technical Guidance Document for
RCRA Air Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks."
EPA-450/3-89-21. July 1990.
4.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Alternative Control Technology Document - Organic
Waste Process Vents" to be published in December 1990.
5.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "RCRA TSDF Air Emissions - Background Technical
Memoranda for Proposed Standards." EPA-450/3-86-009. October 1990.
6.	"Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities; Air
Emission Standards for Volatile Organics Control." Federal Register,
Vol. 52, pages 3748-3770. February 5, 1987.
7.	U.S. EPA/ORD/IERL. "Process Design Manual for Stripping of Organics."
Cincinnati, OH. Publication No. EPA-600/2-84-139. August 1984.
8.	U.S. EPA. Cincinnati, OH. Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. "Air Strippers and
Their Emissions Control at Superfund Sites." Publication No. EPA-
600/D-88-153. August 1988.
9.	U.S. EPA. "Air Stripping of Contaminated Water Sources - Air Emissions
and Controls." Control Technology Center. Research Triangle Park,
NC. Publication No. EPA-450/3-87-017. August 1987.
10.	U.S. EPA/0RD/HWERL. "Preliminary Assessment of Hazardous Waste
Pretreatment as an Air Pollution Control Technique." Publication No.
EPA-600/2-86-028, NTIS PB46-17209/A6. March 1986.
11.	U.S. EPA. "Distillation Operations 1n Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing-Background Information for Proposed Standards." EPA
Publication No. EPA-450/3-83-005a. December 1983.
12.	U.S. EPA. Air Pollution Training Institute, RTP, NC 27711. "APTI
Course 415 Control of Gaseous Emissions." EPA-450/2-81-005.
December 1981.
13.	U.S. EPA. "OAQPS Control Cost Manual, 4th Edition." EPA 450/3-90-006.
OAQPS, RTP, NC 27711. January, 1990.
3-3

-------
What the ?
Purpose of presentation

Process
Vents
~Answer common questions on the RCRA
air rules for organic emissions from
process vents
Basic questions	ง Process
Who is affected ?
Why was Subpart AA developed ?
How many facilities are out there ?
3-4

-------
Questions on details
s*
Process
Vents
What units are regulated ?
How does the regulation work?
When do the regulations become effective ?
What are the requirements for control devices ?
What records have to be maintained ?
What reports have to be filed ?
Who is affected ?

Process
Vents
Facilities subject to Part 270
-	Permitted
-	Interim status
Previously exempt hazardous
waste recycling units at these
facilities
What units are affected?
•	Steam strippers
•	Distillation
•	Fractionation
•	Thin-film evaporation
•	Solvent extraction
•	Air strippers

Process
Vents
3-5

-------
What units are exempted ?

Process
: Vents
Production
Wastewater treatment tanks
Subtitle D
Domestic Sewage
Closed-loop reclamation
Additional detail provided in your
workshop manual on page 3-18 as
Attachment A of this session
What vents are covered ?
Process
Vents
•On affected units that manage hazardous
waste with 10 ppmw or greater total
organics on a time-weighted, annual
average basis
• On tanks associated with an affected unit if
emissions from these process units are
vented through the tank
Overhead
A Vapors
Process
Vents
Example 7
Feed
Vapors
Air
Stripper
Waste in
Air in
Effluent ou?
3-6

-------
Condenser
Example 2
Vapors
Vapors
Vapors
Distillate
Receiver
Steam
Stripper
Waste In
Steam
Feed Tank
Accumulator
Tank
Vapors
^4
Effluent
Storage
	_JL
Why was Subpart AA developed? |prฃew
Vent#
*	To protect human health and the
environment
•	To control emissions from land-disposal
restriction treatment technologies
How many units are out there?

200
Process
Vents
w 100
Fractionation TWn-fBm Sotven)	Steam AlrStrtppen
evaporation Extraction Shippers
Source: 1967 T5DR Survey
3-7

-------
What are the annual emissions
from a typical facility ?

Process
Vents
25.0
20.0 -
>; 15.0
c
o
10.0
5.0
0.0
-L
Large Facility Medium Facility Small Facility
Model Plants - Annual Emissions Estimates
H Process
Vents
How do the regulations work?
O IDENTIFY affected process vents
ฉ DETERMINE emission rates
0 SUM individual rates
ฉ COMPARE to emission rate limits
0 REDUCE emissions below limits or 95%
5*
O IDENTIFY
Units covered by the standards
-	Distillation	- Air stripping
-	Solvent extraction - Fractionation
-	Steam stripping - Thin-film evaporation
which
- Average 10 ppmw or greater organics in waste
Process
Vents
3-8

-------
-	Direct measurement
-	Use of knowledge
ฆ*4
@ DETERMINE	0 Process
— Vents
Hourly and annual emission rates
with either
0 SUM	S Process
- Vents
1
• The individual emission rates to get
a facility process rate
0 COMPARE

Process
Vents
The total facility process vent emissions to the
hourly and annual emission rate limits
3-9

-------
ฉ REDUCE
Process
Vents
~ Facilities exceeding the emission rate limits must
Install controls which
-	Reduce facility emissions below 3 Ib/hr and 3.1
ton/yr, or
-	Reduce facility emissions by 95 percent
Facility Bubble for Emission Rate (ER) =

Process
Vents
Facility
= E Rpv i * E kPv2+E Rpvj
Faculty
Example 3 - Control Options for a Facility
•*4
Process
Vents
ER fQcijiiy - ERpw + ERPv2 •ป ERpvj
ER „ = 10+1+55 = 66 ton/yr
3-10

-------
Example 3 (cont.) - Control Options for a Facility

66(1-.95) = 3.3
Process
Vents
....	Option 1 - 95% control on
ER Facility= 'on/yr an three vents
Option 2 - 88% control on pvl
3.3 ton/yr vs. 3.1 ton/yr and 9g0/o confro| on pv3
When do the regulations
become effective?

Process
Vents
•	Regulations became effective on 1 111 1 /90
•	Compliance date depends on classification of
facility
When do the regulations
become effective? (cont.)
s*
Process
Vents
•	Interim status facilities have until 6/21/92 to
Install control equipment
•	Permitted facilities are shielded from Phase I air
standards
3-11

-------
What are the requirements
for control devices ?
•	No specific device required
•	Individual performance requirements for
-	Vapor recovery systems
-	Enclosed combustion devices
-	Flares
•	Equipment must be properly operated,
maintained, and continuously monitored
Process
Vents
Process
Vents
What are the requirements
for vapor recovery systems
(e.g. condensers or adsorbers) ?
Recovery efficiency of 95 weight percent or
better
Primary recovery devices do not count
toward the 95 weight percent
What are the requirements for
enclosed combustion devices
(e.g., vapor incinerators,
boilers, or process heaters) ?
•	Designed and operated with a destruction
efficiency of 95 weight percent or greater
•	Minimum residence time of 0.5 second at
a minimum temperature of 760 ฐC

Process
Vents
3-12

-------
What are the alternative = p~cesi
requirements for incinerators ? e
• Reduce incinerator exhaust to a
concentration of 20 ppmv total
organics or less
What are the requirements H Process
for flares ?	b
•	No visible emissions
•	Flame present at all times
•	Net heating value requirements
•	Exit velocity requirements
Note
'S*
Process
Vents
• Design requirements for demonstrated
control technologies are presented on
page 3-20 in Attachment B of this
session in your workshop manual
3-13

-------

What are the owner/operator |Pvents$s
responsibilities for
control devices ?
Inspect readings from each
monitoring device daily
Immediately implement corrective
measures, if necessary

Process
Vents
What is a
closed-vent system ?
's*
Process
Vents
Closed-vent System
Ducts, pipes, connectors,
and blowers which transport
vapors or gases from
equipment to a control
device
Carbon Adsorption System
3-14

-------
What records have
to be maintained ?
•	Facility compliance documents
•	Control device records
G*
Process
Vents
Facility compliance H Process
documents	e
Waste stream determinations
Emission rate determinations
Control device records

Process
Vents
•	Control device implementation schedule
•	Design and operating information
•	Control device exceedance records
•	Information on alternative controls
3-15

-------
ฅ
Note
Process
Vents
• Details on recordkeeping requirements
provided on page 3-23 in Attachment C
of this session in your workbook
have to be filed ?
•	Facilities with RCRA permits must report
semiannually all exceedances > 24 hours
•	Interim-status facilities are not required to
report control device exceedances
c\
What reports
Process
Vents
3-16

-------
Summary
Applicability
Decision
Tree
'RCRAn
FACILITY
NO
YES
N0 ^AFFECTED
\ UNITS 7 .
YES
/HAZ. \
WASTES
S10 PPMW
ORGANICS,
RULE iNO
DOES NOT U<;
APPLY J
YES
RCRAN
EXEMPT
UNITS .
NO f RULE
1 *\ APPLIES
YES
EXEMPT
DOES
THE RULE
APPLY ?
Process
Vents
Summary what are the
R Process
emission rate limits ? Venh
Reduce total organic emissions from aN
affected process vents
-	Below 3 Ib/hr and 3.1 ton/yr,
or
-	By 95% after primary recovery
3-17

-------
Process
Vents
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units 	s*
Production Units
•	Applies to hazardous wastes generated in
production or process-related equipment
•	Exemption applies until waste is removed
from the unit, unless the waste remains in
unit for > 90 days after operation ceases
•	40 CFR 261.4(c)
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Generator Accumulation
Tanks
•	Generators who accumulate waste in tanks
or containers for < 90 days are excluded
from permitting requirements
•	40 CFR 270 and 40 CFR 262.34
's*
Process
Vents
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Totally Enclosed
Treatment Units
• Exempt from RCRA Subtitle C under
-40CFR 264.1(g)(5)
-40CFR 265.1(c)(9)
-40CFR 270.1(c)(2)
Process
Vents
3-18

-------
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Closed-Loop
Reclamation Units
40 CFR261.4 amended to allow control of
reclamation of hazardous wastes
Amendments did not change
closed-loop reclamation exemption in
40 CFR 261.4(a)(8)
ms4
'ฆ Process
: vents
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Wastewater Treatment
Units
•	Units regulated under Section 402 or 307(b)
of the Clean Water Act are not subject to
RCRA Subtitle C standards
•	40 CFR 270.1(c)
*4
Process
Vents
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Domestic Sewage Units
Domestic sewage excluded from
definition of solid waste
Domestic sewage units are not subject
to hazardous waste regulations
40 CFR 261.4(a)(1)
ms*
Process
Vents
3-19

-------
Attachment A - RCRA Exempt Units
Subtitle D Units

Process
Vents
•	Subtitle D wastes not subject to
hazardous waste regulations
•	Subtitle D wastes include hazardous
wastes generated by conditionally
exempt small-quantity generators
Attachment B - Control Device Design 	ซr*
= Process
Thermal Incinerators 1 Vents
Minimum and average combustion zone
temperature
Combustion zone residence time
40 CFR 264.1035(b) (4) (i ii)(A)
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Catalytic Incinerators
Minimum and average temperature
across the catalyst bed inlet and outlet
40 CFR 264.1035(b)(4)(iii)(B)
Process
Vents
3-20

-------
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Boilers and Process Heaters
•	Minimum and average combustion
zone temperature
•	Combustion zone residence time
•	Location of vent introduction into
combustion zone
•	40 CFR 264.1035(b)(4)(iii)(C)

Process
Vents
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Flares

Process
Vents
No site-specific design analysis required
Flares must meet specified design and
operation requirements (40 CFR
264.1033(d))
40 CFR 264.1035(b) (4>(iii)(D)
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Condensers
Outlet gas organic concentration level
Outlet gas temperature
Coolant fluid inlet and outlet temperature
40 CFR 264.1035(b) -A) (iii) (E)

Process
Vents
3-21

-------
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Regenerable Carbon
Adsorption Systems
•	Outlet organic concentration level
•	Number, type, and capacity of carbon beds
•	Type and working capacity of activated
carbon
•	Total steam flow over regeneration cycle

Piocess
Vents
Attachment B - Control Device Design
Regenerable Carbon
Adsorption Systems
(continued)
•	Duration of the steaming and cooling/drying
cycles
•	Carbon bed temperature after regeneration
•	Carbon bed regeneration time
•	Design service life of activated carbon
•	40 CFR 264.1035(b)(4)(iii)(F)
s*
Process
Vents
Attachment B - Control Device Design 	r*
= Process
Nonregenerable Carbon 1Vents
Adsorption - Carbon Cannisters
Outlet organic concentration level
Carbon bed capacity
Type and working capacity of activated
carbon
Carbon replacement interval
40 CFR 264.1035(b)(4)(iii)(G)
3-22

-------
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Compliance
Documentation
Information and data to support:
•	Waste determinations
•	Identification of affected process vents
•	Unit throughputs and operating hours
•	Emission rate for each affected vent
•	Emission rate for total facility
•	Basis for determining emission rates
Vr*
: Process
: Vents
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping 	r*
Control Device |
Implementation Schedule
•	Dates for design, construction, and operation
of control devices
•	Schedule may allow 18 months for installation
of control devices
•	Must be in operating record on effective date
•	40 CFR 264.1035(b)(1)
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Control Device
Design Documentation
•	Design analysis
•	References and sources used
•	Statement by owner/operator certifying device
is designed for maximum emissions
•	Statement by owner/operator certifying device
is designed for 95% efficiency
•	Performance test results
•	40 CFR 264.1033
*4
Process
Vents
3-23

-------
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
5*
Control Device
Operating Records
•	Description and date of each modification to
closed-vent system or control device
•	Identification of operating parameter to be
monitored, description of monitoring device,
and diagram of monitoring sensor locations
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Must report periods when control device
operates outside design tolerances
Records include date, duration, cause, and
corrective measures taken
40 CFR 264.1035(c)(5)
V*
: Process
: Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
*4
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Thermal Incinerators
(Operating at 0.5 s and 760 ฐC)
Periods when the combustion temperature
!s below 760 ฐC
40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(i)
: Process
ฆ Vents
3-24

-------
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Thermal Incinerators
(Operating at 95% or 20 ppmw)
•	Periods when the combustion
temperature is more than 28 ฐC below
the design average temperature
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(ii)
V*
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping

Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Catalytic Incinerators
•	Periods when the vent stream temperature
at the catalyst bed inlet is more than 28 ฐC
below the design average temperature, or
•	Periods when the temperature difference
across the catalyst bed is less than 80% of
the design average temperature difference
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(iii)
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Boilers and Process Heaters
•	Periods when the combustion temperature is
more than 28 ฐC below the design average
temperature
•	A change in the location where the vent
stream is introduced to the combustion zone
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c) (4) (iv)
*4
Process
Vents
3-25

-------
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Flares
•	Periods when the flame is not ignited
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(v)
's*
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
s4
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Condensers
with Temperature Monitors
•	Periods when the temperature of the condenser
exhaust is more than 6 ฐC above the design
average temperature, or
•	Periods when the temperature of the coolant
fluid exiting the condenser is more than 6 ฐC
above the design average temperature
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c) <4) (vii)
Process
Vents
Attachment C - Recordkeeping

Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Carbon Adsorbers
Regenerated On-site with
Concentration Monitors
•	Periods when the organic concentration in the
carbon bed exhaust is more than 20% greater
than the design concentration
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(viii
Process
Vents
3-26

-------
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
ฅ
Process
Vents
Control Device
Exceedance Reports
Carbon Adsorbers
Regenerated On-site with
Fixed Regeneration Schedule
•	Periods when the process vent stream continues
to flow to the device beyond the predetermined
bed regeneration time
•	40 CFR 264.1035(c)(4)(ix)
Attachment C - Recordkeeping
Information on
Alternative Control Devices
•	Owner/operator must record information
indicating proper operation
•	Regional administrator will specify appropriate
recordkeeping requirements in permit
negotiation process
•	40 CFR 264.1035(e)
Process
Vents
3-27

-------
SEPA
EQUIPMENT LEAK
STANDARDS
4-1

-------
ABSTRACT: EQUIPMENT LEAK STANDARDS (SUBPART BB)
This session covers the organic air emission standards for equipment leaks at
hazardous waste TSDFs codified in Subpart BB of 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265. The lesson
is designed to provide a basic understanding of the equipment leak rules to aid RCRA
permit writers and enforcement personnel in determining compliance and to aid facility
owners and operators in achieving compliance.
The session begins with a review of the background of the equipment leak rules
followed by a detailed presentation of the applicability of the rules. The control
requirements are briefly summarized with references to the standards for details.
Waste stream determinations for the purposes of applicability are covered in detail and
the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are summarized. As is the case with the
control requirements, references to the standard are provided for details of the
recordkeeping requirements.
4-2

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.	"Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities -- Organic
Air Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks."
Federal Register, Vol. 55 pages 25454-25519. June 21, 1990.
2.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS, "Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities (TSDF) ~ Background Information for Promulgated Organic
Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks,"
EPA-450/3-89-009, July 1990.
3.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "Hazardous Waste TSDF - Technical Guidance Document for
RCRA Air Emission Standards for Process Vents and Equipment Leaks."
EPA-450/3-B9-21. July 1990.
4.	U.S. EPA, OAQPS. "RCRA TSDF Air Emissions - Background Technical
Memoranda for Proposed Standards." EPA-450/3-86-009. October 1986.
5.	"Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities; Air
Emission Standards for Volatile Organics Control." Federal Register,
Vol. 52, pages 3748-3770. February 5, 1987.
6.	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fugitive Emission Sources of
Organic Compounds--Additional Information on Emissions, Emission
Reductions, arid Cost. Research Triangle Park, NC. Publication No.
EPA-450/3-82-010. April 1982.
7.	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Pollution Training Institute,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. "APTI Course SI:417 Controlling
V0C Emissions from Leaking Process Equipment." EPA 450/2-82-015.
August 1982.
4-3

-------
Organic Air Emission Standards
for Equipment Leaks
at Hazardous Waste Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities
40 CFR Parts 264 and
265 Subpart BB
Purpose
• Provide basic understanding of
Subpart BB equipment leak rules
promulgated under Section 3004(n) of
RCRA
Highlights
•	Standards generally affect equipment
contacting organic wastes
•	Facilities may have hundreds of these
potential sources
•	Standards include leak detection and
repair (LDAR) and specified equipment
•	Compliance is demonstrated through the
maintenance of records
4-4

-------
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
Background
Subpart BB Equipment
Leak Standards
•	Promulgated June 21,1990
(55 FR 25454)
•	Effective date December 21, 1990
4-5

-------
Background
Standards
•	Adopted from CAA standards for:
-	Benzene equipment leaks
-	SOCMI
-	Petroleum refineries
-	Coke oven by-product plants
•	Revised to RCRA format
•	Parts 264 and 265 rules identical except
reporting is not required by Part 265
Exempt I
from |
Subpart BB [
No
Yes
[Yes
No
Yes
Yes
4-6
Hazardous waste
10% organic^
Subpart BB
does no!
apply
Background
Applicability
Waste stream determination
Control requirements
Recordkeeping requirements
Reporting requirements
Summary
Topics

-------
Applicability
Equipment Covered by Subpart BB
•	Pumps
•	Valves
•	Compressors
•	Sampling connections systems
•	Open-ended valves or lines
•	Pressure-relief devices
•	Flanges and other connectors
Labyrinth Shaft Seal for Compressors
A
Potential
c ^	
Leak Gas


vmm?

Internal
Atmosphere
Gas Pressure

Rising Stem Gate Valve
Packing Nut
Packing Gland
Potential
Leak Areas
Packing
4-7

-------
Spring-Loaded Relief Valve
Emissions
(simmering, improper
reseating, pressure relief)
Spring
Possible
Leak Area
Disk
Vent
Process Side
Flanged Joint
Potential
/ Leak Area
Leaks caused by
•	Improperly chosen gaskets
•	Damaged gaskets
•	Poor assembly
•	Vibrations
Applicability
Equipment
• Affected equipment is found in destruction
or recycling/recovery processes; for
example:
-	Incineration
-	Distillation
-	Solvent extraction
-	Steam stripper
-	Storage tanks for reclaimed organics
4-8

-------
Steam Stripper
Process Vent
Primary Condenser
Vapor Phase /
in
Storage Tank
Storage
and
Feed Tank
Bottoms Receiver
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
Waste Stream Determination
•	Waste organic content at least 10%
by weight
•	Gas or liquid at operating conditions
•	Liquid stream light or heavy liquid
4-9

-------
Waste Stream Determination
Basis of Determinations
•	Knowledge
•	Analysis by direct measurement
Waste Stream Determination
Examples of Knowledge
•	No organics used
•	Identical to other process
•	Prior speciation analysis with no process
changes
Waste Stream Determination
Applicability of Organic Content
Analytical Methods
Method
Compounds
most applicable
ASTM E 260-85
(General GC analysis)
Multiple compounds
ASTM D 2267-88
(Aromatics by GC)
Benzene, toluene. C8. and
heavier aromatics
Method 9060 (SW-8^6)
(Tola! organic carbon
(TOCI)
Organic carbon greater
than 1 mg/L
Method 8240 (SW-846)
(Votatiles by gas
chroma lographfmass
spectrometer (GC/MS))
Generally used to measure
Appendix VIII compounds
in wastewaters, sludges,
and soils
ASTM E 168-88
(Infrared [IR| analysis)
Single- or double-component
systems
ASTM E 169-87
(Ultraviolet (UV) analysis)
Single- or double-component
systems
4-10

-------
Waste Stream Determination
Applicability of Organic
Analytical Detectors

Compounds
Method
most applicable
Flame ionization
All
Photoionization
Aromatics
Hall electrolytic
Halogenated
conductivity

device

Nondispersive
Any compound with
infrared
C-H bond
Mass spectrometer
All
Waste Stream Determination
Gaseous Waste Determination
• Gas at operating conditions
Example: Overhead stream from distillation
prior to the condenser
Waste Stream Determination
Light/Heavy Liquid Determination
•	A light liquid:
-	Is a liquid at operating temperatures
-	Contains compound(s) with vapor
pressure >0.3 kPa (0.04 psia) at
20 ฐC (68 ฐF)
ฆ Total concentration of pure
components with vapor pressure >C.3
kPa at 20 ฐC is greater than 20%
•	All liquids not light liquids are heavy
liquids.
4-11

-------
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
Control Requirements
Work Practice
•	Work practices are based on a leak
detection and repair program (LDAR)
*	LDAR varies by source type, but
includes:
-	Leak detection monitoring
-	Inspections - visual and olfactory
-	Repair within a given time frame
Control Requirements
Leak Detection Monitoring with
Method 21
•	Portable total organic analyzer is used to
locate leaks from valves, flanges, and
pumps
•	A leak is defined as 10,000 ppm, based
on a reference compound
•	The Subpart BB reference compound is
methane or n-hexane
•	A response factor must be determined for
each compound to be measured
4-12

-------
Control Requirements
Repairs
•	The first repair attempt must be made
within 5 calendar days of detecting leak
•	Repair must be completed within 15
calendar days of detecting leak
Control Requirements
Emission Limits
•	For equipment designed not to leak (e.g., no waste
contact with external activating mechanisms)
•	No detectable emissions (Method 21)
•	Compliance test initially and at least annually
Sealless Pumps Can Be Designated
for No Detectable Emissions
Outer
coupling
O-ring
Containment
Bearings
Motor
Volute
Motor
stator
Bearing
$v rj- inner
VWy coupling
Motor (oior/pump shaft
Impeller
b. Canned motor centrifugal pump
a. Magnetically coupled centrifugal pump
4-13

-------
Sealless Pumps Can Be Designated
for No Detectable Emissions
Inner
coupling
Ouier	. O-ring
coupling v	\ x	/Oearing
Motor
ป Gear
Magnets
c. Magnetically coupled gear pump
Oullei , Ball and seal
Hydraulic Huid
7mhj
Hie
V	* Die-
* Cam
' Piston
11 Diaphragms
Inlet
d. Hydraulically backed diaphragm
metering pump
Control Requirements
Equipment Standards
•	Specified equipment (dual seals, closed vents,
caps, closed loop sampling)
•	Checked by visual inspection and for detectable
emissions (Method 21)
•	Leaks must be repaired within 15 days
Control Requirements
Summary
Source Service
Pump
Valvo
Emission
Limit
Equipment
Specification
Work
Practice
Light
liquid
Heavy
liquid
Gas & light
liquid
No detectable (or) Dual seals, (or)
emissions	closed vent
Monthly moniioring
(and)
weekly inspection
No detectable (or)
emissions
Monthly moniioring
Heavy
liquid
"Monitoring is required if evidence ol a leak is found.
iHJ Indicates the primary control method.
4-14

-------
Control Requirements




Summary (continued)

Source
Service
Emission
Limit
Equipment
Specification
Work
Practice
Pressure-
reliof
Gas
No detectable
emissions
Closed vent

device





Light &
heavy
liquids


l • 1




Flange/
connector
Gas & light
& heavy
liquids


i • i



'Monitoring is required if evidence of a leak is found.
1 1 Indicates the primary control method.
Control Requirements
Summary (concluded)
Source
Sampling
connection
Open-
ended
line
Service
Compressor Gas
Emission
Limit
No detectable (or)
emissions
Gas & lighi
& heavy
liquids
Gas & light
& heavy
liquids
Equipment
Specification
Seal system
with barrier fluid,
orcfosedvent
Closed-purge
system or dosed
vont	
Cap. plug, flange,
or second valve
Work
Practice
(!~ Indicates Ihe primary control method.
Double Mechanical Seal with Barrier
Fluid Controls Emissions
Possible Leak into
Sealing Fluid
Seal FacI?
Outer Seal Assembly
Inner Seal Assembl;
Fluid
End
4-15

-------
Handwheel Operated Pinch Valve
Rupture Disk
To Almosphere
Process S-de
Closed-Loop Sampling System
(To Avoid Losses from Sampling)
Process Line
Sample Container
4-16

-------
Process Fluid
(perhaps under (
pressure)
Valve
Closed
T
T
\ X ^ Pipe
\
j' Leak
k X
Cap

Open-Ended Line
(leaks through valve)
Cap When Not
in Use
Control Requirements
Equipment Leak Model Units
Model	Sampling Open-ended Pressure-reliel
Unit Pumps Valves Connections Lines	Devices
A
15
364
26
105
9
B
5
121
9
35
3
C
3
72
5
21
2
Control Requirements
Equipment Leak Impacts


Emission


Model
Emissions
Reductions
Capital Costs*
Annual Costs'
Unit
(Mg/yr)
(Mg/yr)
<%)
($>
(S)
A
41.1
30.4
74
68,300
31,000
B
13.7
10.2
74
27,000
11.900
C
8.3
6.2
74
18,700
8,100
Nationwide
26,200
19.000
72.5
127 million
32.9 million
'Costs are in 1986 dollars.
4-17

-------
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
Recordkeeping
Compliance with the control
requirements of Subpart BB
is demonstrated through the
maintenance of records
Recordkeeping Requirements
General Records Required
•	Equipment-specific identification
information (Section 264.1064[b])
•	Closed-vent system and control device
information (Section 264.1064[e])
•	Information on equipment not subject to
monthly LDAR (Section 264.1064[g])
4-18

-------
Recordkeeping Requirements
General Records Required
(continued)
•	Marking of leaking equipment
(Section 264.1064[c]).
•	Information on leaking equipment
(Section 264.1064[d])
•	Barrier fluid system sensor information
(Section 264.1064[j])
•	Information for determining exemptions
(Section 264.1064[k])
Recordkeeping Requirements
Records Retention
•	Three years for records of:
-	Monthly leak monitoring and repair
-	Detectable emission monitoring
-	Closed-vent and control device
operations
•	Other records in the facility operating
record must be kept for the life of the
facility.
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
4-19

-------
Reporting Requirements
Information Required in Semiannual
Reports (264.1065)
•	Control device exceedances uncorrected
for >24 hours - dates, duration, cause,
corrective measures
•	Pumps in LL service, valves in G/LL
service, compressors not repaired in 15
days
•	No report required if no exceedances
•	Facilities subject to interim status
provisions, Part 265, are not required to
report.
Topics
•	Background
•	Applicability
•	Waste stream determination
•	Control requirements
•	Recordkeeping requirements
•	Reporting requirements
•	Summary
4-20

-------
Summary
Equipment Leak Rules
•	Equipment at new or existing TSDF requiring
RCRA Subtitle C permit
•	Equipment containing or contacting wastes with at
least 10% organic
•	Control requirements vary by type of service-
gas, light liquid, heavy liquid
•	Recordkeeping requirements to demonstrate
compliance
•	Semiannual reporting of exceedances
Summary





Types of Equipment Leak Standards

Sources
Equipment

Work
Practice

Emission
Limit
Pumps
•
(or)
•
(or)
•
Valves


•
(or)
•
Compressors
•
(or)


•
Sampling
connection systems
•




Open-ended
valves or lines
•




Pressure-relief
devices


•

•
Flanges and
other connectors


•



4-21

-------
PHASE II
AIR RULES

-------
ABSTRACT: RCRA PHASE II RULEMAKING
Under the RCRA Phase II rulemaking, the U.S. EPA is developing new
standards and amendments that would control more TSDF waste management
units and add new requirements and implementation changes to the existing
RCRA air emission standards under Subpart AA (TSDF treatment unit process
vents) and Subpart BB (TSDF equipment leaks). A new Subpart CC would be
added to 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265 requiring organic emission controls be
applied to TSDF tanks, surface impoundments, containers, and certain
miscellaneous units based on the volatile organic concentration of the waste
managed in the unit. In addition, compliance with the air emission control
requirements relevant to tanks and containers under Subparts AA, BB, and CC
would be included as a condition to maintain a permit exemption for 90-day
accumulation tanks and containers. Also, the U.S. EPA would amend 40 CFR
270.4 to require the owner or operator of an existing permitted TSDF to comply
with the RCRA air emission standards for interim status facilities (40 CFR 265
Subparts AA, BB, and CC) until the facility's permit is modified or renewed.
Finally, to be consistent with Subpart CC, the U.S. EPA would add to Subparts
AA and BB requirements for managing spent carbon removed from carbon
adsorbers.
5-2

-------
Purpose
€ Summarize the proposed
Subpart CC control
requirements
• Present other requirements proposed in
the Phase II rulemaking
Highlights of Phase II Rulemaking
•	Control more TSDF waste management
units
•	Based on volatile organic concentration of
waste
•	New requirements added and
implementation changes for
Subparts AA and BB
Outline
•	Background
•	Proposed Subpart CC Standards
•	Proposed Test Methods
•	Other Proposed Amendments
•	Summary
5-3

-------
Background
TSDF Organic Emissions
•	Contribute to ambient ozone formation
-	1.8 million megagrams per year of
organics
•	Impact public health
-	140 cancer incidences per year
nationwide
-	Maximum individual risk of cancer
= 2x10-2
•	Contribute to stratospheric ozone
depletion
National VOC Emissions - Stationary Sources
Hazardous Waste TSDF
Industrial Processes
2%
Surface Coating
20%
Petroleum Marketinq
14%
Petroleum Refining
5%
Misc Solvent Uses
< • ฆ , |i
23%
I


A--''
'

i
TSDF
1 P
VNป 12%
•

J
Phase 2
98%
Phase 1
2%
Chemical Manufacture
3%
Misc. Sources
20%
5-4

-------
Rulemaking Status
•	Proposal
•	Public hearing
•	Public comment period ends
•	EPA reviews and considers public
comments
•	Final rules promulgated
Outline
•	Background
•	Proposed Subpart CC standards
•	Proposed test methods
•	Other proposed amendments
•	Summary
Proposed Subpart CC Standards
•	Add air emission control requirements for
more TSDF waste management units
•	Same implementation as Subparts AA
and BB
-	Subpart CC in Part 264 for permitted
TSDF
-	Subpart CC in Part 265 for interim
status TSDF
•	Requirements identical except for
reporting in Part 264
5-5

-------
Subpart CC Standards
Applicability
•	RCRA Subtitle C facilities
•	Waste management units
-	Tanks
-	Surface impoundments
-	Containers
-	Miscellaneous units
Subpart CC Standards
Control Strategy
•	Identify waste streams with significant
emission potential
•	Control waste from point where it is
generated through treatment to remove or
destroy organics
•	Other rules establish treatment standards
Subpart CC Standards
Demonstration of Compliance
Either:
1.	Install and operate organic emission
controls
or
2.	Determine that waste managed in unit at
all times has a volatile organic
concentration <500 ppmw
or
3.	Certify that waste managed in the unit
complies with Part 268 land disposal
restrictions treatment standards for
organics
5-6

-------
Subpart CC Standards
Tanks
•	Cover and vent to a control device
•	Alternative controls:
-	External floating roof
-	Fixed roof with internal floating roof
•	Control device not required for certain
tanks:
-	Organic vapor pressure below
certain limits
-	Waste managed in a "quiescent"
manner
Subpart CC Standards
Surface Impoundments
•	Cover and vent to a control device
•	Control device not required when waste is
managed in a "quiescent" manner
Subpart CC Standards
Containers
•	Cover
•	Submerge fill pumpable waste
•	Enclose and vent to a control device
during certain waste treatment processes
(e.g., waste fixation)
5-7

-------
Subpart CC Standards
Miscellaneous Units
•	Case-by-case determination based on
similarity
•	Comply with requirements in
40 CFR Subparts AA, BB, or CC
•	Example:
If — miscellaneous unit resembles a
surface impoundment
Then -~ comply with surface
impoundment standards
Outline
•	Background
•	Proposed Subpart CC standards
•	Proposed test methods
•	Other proposed amendments
•	Summary
Test Methods	Background
•	Used to determine which waste streams
require controls
•	Focus on organics potentially emitted
rather than total organics
•	Does not measure specific organic
compounds
•	Methods would be added to both:
-	40 CFR 60 Appendix A
-	"Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods"
(SW-846)
5-8

-------
Test Methods
Volatile Organic Concentration
•	Reference Method 25D/Test Method 5100
•	Procedure:
1.	Collect representative samples;
minimizing loss of volatiles
2.	Heat sample and purge with nitrogen
3.	Analyze purged stream for carbon, as
methane, and halogens, as chloride
4.	Sum methane mass and chloride
mass
Test Methods
Organic Vapor Pressure
•	Reference Method 25E/Test Method 5110
•	Procedure:
1.	Collect representative samples
2.	Analyze head space vapor for carbon
as propane
3.	Calculate vapor organic pressure from
measured propane concentration
Outline
•	Background
•	Proposed Subpart CC standards
•	Proposed test methods
•	Other proposed amendments
•	Summary
5-9

-------
Proposed Amendments
•	Add new requirements and
implementation changes to
Subparts AA and BB
•	Affect:
-	90-day accumulation of hazardous
waste
-	Implementation of RCRA air rules
-	Management of spent carbon from
carbon adsorbers
90-Day Accumulation
Current Requirements
•	Generator tanks and containers
accumulating waste for 90 days or less
•	Exempt from the permitting requirements
if comply with certain conditions in
40 CFR 262.34(a)
•	Conditions include compliance with:
-	40 CFR 265 Subpart I for containers
-	40 CFR 265 Subpart J for tanks
90-Day Accumulation
Proposed Requirements
•	Add air emission control requirements to
maintain permit exemption
•	Amend 40 CFR 265 Subparts I and J
•	Conditions for exemption for a tank or
container would include compliance
with relevant requirements in
Subparts AA, BB, and CC
5-10

-------
RCRA Rule Implementation
Current Practice for New RCRA Rules
•	Interim status TSDF comply by rule's
effective date
•	Permitted TSDF comply when the facility's
permit is modified or renewed
RCRA Rule Implementation
Proposed Implementation of
RCRA Air Rules
•	Change implementation practice for
Subparts AA, BB, and CC by amending
40 CFR 270.4
•	Would require compliance by rule's
effective date regardless of permit status
RCRA Rule Implementation
Proposed Implementation of
RCRA Air Rules
(continued)
•	TSDF with a permit issued before
effective date would comply with the Part
265 standards until the facility's permit is
modified or renewed
•	TSDF with a permit issued or renewed
ฆ after effective date would comply with
the Part 264 standards
5-11

-------
Spent Carbon
Current Management
•	Activated carbon periodically replaced
•	Spent carbon saturated with organics
•	No environmental benefit if the organics
adsorbed on spent carbon are released to
the atmosphere
Spent Carbon
Proposed Management Requirements
•	Add requirements requiring offsite
regeneration, reactivation, or disposal be
controlled
•	Amend Subparts AA and BB to be
consistent with Subpart CC
Spent Carbon
Proposed Management Requirements
(continued)
• Would require certification that spent
carbon is managed in either:
1.	Regeneration/reactivation process
that minimizes air emissions
or
2.	Incinerator complying with
40 CFR 264 Subpart 0
5-12

-------
Outline
•	Background
•	Proposed Subpart CC standards
•	Proposed test methods
•	Other proposed amendments
•	Summary
Summary
•	Establish air emission standards for TSDF
tanks, surface impoundments, containers,
and miscellaneous units
•	Require organic emission controls be
applied to waste streams with volatile
organic concentration >500 ppmw
•	Add new waste test methods to determine
volatile organic concentration and organic
vapor pressure
Summary
(continued)
•	Add compliance with relevant air emission
control requirements under Subparts AA,
BB, and CC to maintain permit exemption
for 90-day tanks and containers
•	Require permitted TSDF comply with
Subparts AA, BB, and CC under Part 265
until the facility's permit is modified or
renewed
•	Add spent carbon management
requirements to Subparts AA and BB
consistent with Subpart CC
5-13

-------
3 EPA
RCRA OVERVIEW
A-l

-------
RCRA Overview-Purpose
•	Summarize RCRA
•	Discuss structure of Subtitle C program
•	Review goals of Subtitle D program
•	Provide context for TSDF air emission rules
RCRA Overview - Highlights
• RCRA-TheAct
• Subtitle C -
Hazardous Waste

40 CFR Parts addressing TSDF air emissions:


264 Permitted TSDF standards


265 Interim status TSDF standards


270 Permit program

• Subtitle D - Solid Waste (nonhazardous)
RCRA Overview-Outline
1.
RCRA Overview

- RCRA Orientation Video Segment 1

"Introduction to RCRA" (12 minutes)
2.
Subtitle C - Structure and Operation
3.
Relationship of 3004(n) Standards to Other

RCRA Rules
4.
Additional RCRA Air Standards
A-2

-------
Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA)
Title II - Solid Waste Disposal
Subtitle C - Hazardous Waste Management
RCRA Subtitle C -
Hazardous Waste Management
A Federal "cradle-to-grave" system to manage hazardous waste
Statutes and regulations for hazardous waste:
•	Identification and listing of hazardous waste
•	Generators
•	Transporters
•	Treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
•	Permitting
•	Enforcement
•	State authorization

RCRA Hazardous Waste Program -

Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations
40 CFR Part Title
260
Hazardous waste management system: general
261
Identification and listing of hazardous waste
262
Standards applicable to generation of hazardous waste
263
Standards applicable to transporters of hazardous waste
264
Standards for owners and operators of hazardous waste

treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
265
Interim status standards for owners and operators of

hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities

A-3

-------

RCRA Hazardous Waste Program -
Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (continued)
40 CFR Part Title
266
Standards for the management of specific hazardous wastes

and specific types of hazardous waste management facilities
267
Interim status standards for owners and operators of new

hazardous waste land disposal facilities
268
Land disposal restrictions
270
EPA-administered permit programs: the hazardous waste

permit program
271
Requirements for authorization of State hazardous waste

programs
124
Procedures for decisionmaking

Waste Classifications
•	Definition of solid waste
•	Definition of hazardous waste
•	Exclusions to definitions
Hazardous Waste Definition
•	Characteristic wastes
•	Listed wastes
•	Mixture rule wastes
•	Derived from rule wastes
A-4

-------
Hazardous Waste Characteristics
•	Define characteristics in terms of
Physical,
Chemical, or
Other hazardous waste properties
•	Measure properties by standardized and available testing protocols
Hazardous Waste Characteristics (con.)
Characteristic Ignitable
RCRA Code D001
Corrosive
D002
Reactive
D003
Toxic*
D004 - D043
"Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (effective 9/29/90).
Hazardous Waste Listings
Category
Nonspecific industry sources
Specific industry sources
RCRA Codes
F	
K
Commercial chemical products,	P	and U
manufacturing chemical intermediates,
and contaminated soils and cleanup materials
A-5

-------
RCRA Waste Codes
F001 - F028 Wastes from Non-Specific Sources
Examples:
•	Spent halogenated degreasing solvents (F001)
•	Sludges from electroplating (F006)
RCRA Waste Codes
K001 - K136 Wastes from Specific Sources
Examples:
•	Oil emulsion solids from petroleum refining (K049)
•	Wastewater sludge from toxaphene production (K041)
RCRA Waste Codes
P001 - 122 and U001 - 359 Discarded/Off spec
Chemical Products/Species
Examples:
•	Container residue - dieldrin (P037)
•	Spill residue - pyridine (U196)
A-6

-------
Generators
•	Facility owner or operator or person who first creates a
hazardous waste
or
•	Person who first makes the waste subject to Subtitle C
regulations:
Combines hazardous wastes
Imports hazardous waste
Generators (con.)
• Three categories:
-	Large-quantity generators
-	Small-quantity generators
-	Conditionally exempt small-
quantity generators
—greater than 1,000 kg/mo
—ฆ- 100 to 1,000 kg/mo
—ป- less than 100 kg/mo, or
less than 1 kg/mo if acutely
hazardous

Generators (con.)
•
EPA identification numbers
•
Pretransport requirements
•
Manifests for shipments
•
Recordkeeping and reporting
•
Hazardous waste accumulation time

- No permit required if accumulated less than

• 90 days - large-quantity generators

• 180 or 270 days - small-quantity generators

• No time limit - conditionally exempt small-quantity

generators
A-7

-------
Hazardous Waste Generator Statistics
Waste Quantity by Generator Size
Small-Quantity Generators (1%)
(2 million Mg/yr)
Large-Quantity Generators (99%)
(273 million Mg/yr)
Source: EPAOSWER, The Hazardous Waste System, June 1967.
Hazardous Waste Generator Statistics
Number of Generators by Generator Size
Large-Quantity Generators (75%)
(71,000)
Small-Quantity Generators (25%)
(26,000)
Source: EPAOffice of Solid Wasle, April 1984 and June 1986.
A-8

-------

Transporters
•
EPA identification number
•
Marking, labeling, packaging, placarding, and spill reports
•
Manifest system
•
Handling hazardous waste discharges
•
Storage more than 10 days - RCRA storage permit
Basic Permitting Requirements
•	Any facility that treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous waste
must have a permit
•	Permit exemptions limited to:
-	Generator accumulation time
-	Emergency situations
-	Imminent and substantial endangerment situations

Interim Status Standards
•
Applies to facilities not yet permitted
•
To qualify for interim status, a facility must:

- Exist when it becomes subject to permit requirements

- Notify EPA under RCRA Section 3010

- Submit Part A permit application which

• Describes waste types and quantities

• Identifies waste management processes
Interim Status is Temporary!
•
Available only until the final permit decision
A-9

-------
Interim Status Standards (con.)
•	Self-implementing
•	Administrative standards (apply to all facilities):
-	Waste analysis plan	- Manifest system
-	Personnel training program - Closure and post-closure plans
-	Contingency plan	- Financial responsibility
Interim Status Standards (con.)
• Technical standards address specific types of units:
-	Containers	- Landfills
-	Tanks	- Land treatment units
-	Surface impoundments - Incinerators
-	Wastepiles	- Thermal treatment units
-	Chemical, physical, and biological treatment
Components of a Permit
• General facility standards
-	Security
-	Inspection
-	Personnel training
-	Location standards
-	Preparedness and prevention
-	Manifest system
-	Recordkeeping and reporting
A-10

-------
Components of a Permit (con.)
•	Waste analysis plan
•	Contingency plan
•	Training plan
•	Closure plan
•	Post-closure plan
•	Corrective action schedule of compliance
•	Air emissions
Components of a Permit (con.)
• Unit-specific standards

- Containers
- Landfills
- Tanks
- Land treatment units
- Surface impoundments
- Incinerators
- Wastepiles
- Miscellaneous units

(Subpart X)

RCRA Permit Process - Key Steps
•
Applicant submits Part B permit application
•
EPA reviews application
•
EPA prepares draft permit
•
EPA issues public notice to local newspapers and radio stations

- Notice of draft permit, or

- Notice of intent to deny permit
A-ll

-------

RCRA Permit Process - Key Steps (con.)
•
EPA allows 45-day comment period
•
EPA holds public hearing, if requested
•
EPA issues final decision and responds to comments
•
Public appeals decision (if desired)
Statutory Deadlines for Permitting
Waste Managemenl Process
Application
Due
Agency
Decision
Land disposal facilities
11/85
11/88
Incinerators
11/86
11/89
Storage/trealment and
11/88
11/92
miscellaneous units (Subpart X)


Land Disposal Restrictions
•	Requires treatment prior to land disposal
•	Exception - Case-by-case petition demonstrating no migration
from disposal unit
-	Treatability
-	National treatment capacity
-	Surface impoundment exemption
•	2-Year variance where no treatment capacity exists
A-12

-------
Land Disposal Restrictions
• Implementation of restrictions
Solvents and dioxins
November 8,1986
California list
July 8, 1987
First third scheduled wastes
August 8,1988
Second third scheduled wastes
June 8,1989
Third third scheduled wastes
May 8, 1990
Newly listed wastes (post-1984)
LDR determination
6 months after listing
40 CFR 271 - Requirements for Authorization
of State Hazardous Waste Programs
Procedures to grant States authority to administer RCRA in lieu of
Federal authority.

Standards Development
under Section 3004(n)
Phase I
•	Total organics
•	Process vents and equipment leaks
•	Promulgated 6/21/90 (55 FR 25454)
Phase II
•	Total organics
•	Tanks, surface impoundments, containers
and miscellaneous units
Phase III
• Individual constituent standards, as needed,
to supplement Phase I and Phase II standards
A-13

-------
Relationship of 3004(n)
Standards to Other Rules
•	Hazardous waste toxicity characteristic
•	Land disposal restrictions (LDR) under Section 3004(m)
•	Corrective action under Section 3004(u)
•	CERCLA/SARA
Toxicity Characteristic
Background
•	RCRA interprets "hazardous" characteristic as:
-	Ignitable - Reactive
-	Corrosive - Toxic
•	40 Toxic organic and inorganic compounds and elements
•	Concentration-based limits for toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure
•	Effective date = September 25,1990
Toxicity Characteristic
Relation to Section 3004(n) Standards
• Increases the volume of waste managed as hazardous
A-14

-------
Land Disposal Restrictions
Background
•	Treatment required before land disposal
•	Land disposal units include:
—	Landfills
—	Surface impoundments
—	Wastepiles
—	Land treatment units
—	Underground injection wells
•	Final effective date = May 8, 1990
•	Surface impoundments (treatment) exempt
if dredged annually
Land Disposal Restrictions


Air Emissions Reduced by Land Ban
Organic Emission


Sources
Yes
No
Tanks

V
Containers

V
Process vents

V
Equipment leaks

V
Miscellaneous units

V
Surface impoundments

V
Landfills
V

Land treatment units
V

Wastepiles
V

Underground injection wells
V


Land Disposal Restrictions
Impact on TSDF Air Emissions
•	Treatment can cause cross-media air emissions
•	Treatment reduces air emissions from land disposal units
A-15

-------
Land Disposal Restrictions
Relation to TSDF Air Standards
•	Phase I addresses LDR treatment process emissions
•	Phase II suppresses emissions to LDR treatment unit
for removal or destruction
Corrective Action
Background
•	Addresses constituent releases to air, water, and soil
•	Applies to hazardous and solid waste management
units at TSDF
•	Establishes site-specific compliance standards for
releases to each media
Corrective Action
Relation to Section 3004(n)
Air Standards
•	Corrective action units must comply with air rules
•	Corrective action relies on Section 3004(n) for control
of organic emissions
A-16

-------
CERCLA/SARA
Background
•	Authorizes EPA to "remove" and "remediate" hazardous
substance releases
•	"Removal"-short-term action to minimize exposure
Example: cleanup of a transportation spill
•	"Remediation"-long-term action to provide permanent remedy
CERCLA/SARA




Criteria

•
Site-specific

•
10"6 target risk

•
Meet ARARs
CERCLA/SARA
ARARs - "Applicable or Relevant
and Appropriate Requirements"
•	"Applicable" requirements - rules applicable to CERCLA
actions
•	"Relevant and appropriate" requirements - rules not
applicable but similar
A-17

-------
CERCLA/SARA
ARARs - Relation to TSDF
Air Standards
•	Phase I may be ARARs for certain processes
•	Phase II when promulgated may be ARARs for certain
processes
•	Hazardous waste generated at CERCLA sites would
be managed at TSDF (under air standards)
CERCLA/SARA
ARARS — Potential Relation
to TSDF Air Standards
Applicable
Relevant and
appro priats
Hazardous wastes
>10 ppmw
volatile organics
'Substances" (e.g., non-
hazardous wastes)
>10 ppmw
volatile organics
CERCLA Management
Processes:
Distillation
Thin-film evaporation
Air stripping
Steam stripping
Fractionation
Solvent extraction
CERCLA/SARA
ARARs - Relation to TSDF
Air Standards
• Phase I process vent standards are neither "applicable" nor
"relevant and appropriate" to:
—	Soil excavation — In situ soil vapor extraction
—	In situ steam	— Soil washing
stripping of soil _ Bioremediation
—	In situ stabilization
— Low-temperature thermal
desorption
A-18

-------
Additional RCRA Air Standards
Currently Regulated
Land disposal units (particulates)
Incinerators
Miscellaneous units (general)
Thermal treatment units
(interim status TSDF only)
Boilers and industrial furnaces
Land Disposal Units
40 CFR 264/265, Subparts L, M, & N
•	General design and operating practices to limit
particulates
•	Applicable to:
—	Wastepiles
—	Land treatment units
—	Landfills
•	Guidance document:
Hazardous Waste TSDF—Fugitive Particulate Matter Air
Emissions Guidance Document, May 1989
(EPA 450/3-089-019, NTIS No. PB 90103250)
Incinerators
40 CFR 264/265, Subpart O
•	Performance standard:
99.99% Destruction and removal efficiency for principal
organic hazardous constituents
•	Air emission limits on:
—	Hydrochloric acid
—	Particulates
—	Carbon monoxide
•	Revised risk-based regulations proposed in April 1990
A-19

-------
Miscellaneous Units
40 CFR 264, Subpart X
• Musi prevent air releases that adversely affect human
health and the environment
Thermal Treatment Units
40 CFR 265, Subpart P
•	Interim status facilities only
•	Requires monitoring for:
—	Visible emissions
—	Operating conditions
•	Prohibits open burning (except for explosives)
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces
40 CFR, Part 266
•	Proposed — 52 FR 16987 (May 6, 1987)
•	Performance standard:
99.99% Destruction and removal efficiency for principal
organic hazardous constituents
•	Air emission limits on:
-	Carbon monoxide
-	Metals
-	Hydrochloric acid
A-20

-------
Case Study:
Measuring and
Estimating Emissions
B-l

-------

Measure or Estimate?
•
Sources to be constructed
•
Enclosed vented sources
•
Accuracy thai can be obtained
•
Is upper bound sufficient?
•
Variability (waste, operation, weather)
•
Cost and timing
Emission Measurements
•	Direct measurement
•	Indirect measurement
•	Engineering calculation
Direct Measurement
•	Vent sampling
•	Isolation flux chamber
B-2

-------
Vent Sampling
Vent
iftfl
v.T
Probe
ฃ
Calibration
Valve
Particulate
Filter or
Separation
Device

Sampling
Pump

Sample
Container
or
On-Line
Analyzer/
Recorder

Sampling
Applicable to TSDF
Approach
Emission Sources
Vent sampling
Vented treatment systems

Vented landfills

Vented storage buildings

Storage tanks

Solvent recovery
Isolation Flux Chamber and
Supporting Equipment
Carrier
Gas
Temperature
Sensor / Recorder
Impeller
Sampling
Plexiglas
Top
Outlet
Real-Time
Anal/zer
Stainless Steel
or Plexiglas
B-3

-------

Sampling
Applicable to TSDF
Approach
Emission Sources
Isolation flux
Active landfills
chamber
Inactive landfills

Surface impoundments

Land treatment

Cracks on landfill cap

Vents
Indirect Measurement
>
•	Concentration—profile technology
•	Transect technology
Concentration-Profile Technology
Sampling
Mast
Direction *4
Indicator
Sampling
Probes
Y///////////S
Real-Time y.
'// uaia //
y. Collection V/
LfesuA
Thermocouple
Ground or Liquid Surface
B-4

-------
Sampling
Approach
Applicable to TSDF
Emission Sources
Concentration —
profile technology
Surface impoundments
Land treatment
Concentration Profile Technology
•	Not suitable for quiescent or unstable
wind conditions
•	Not applicable to heterogeneous site with
many different emission sources
Transect Technology
Wind
Speed
Sensor
Sar
Wind
Direction
Indicator
Sampling
Probe at
an Upwind
Location
Virtual
Point
Source
* Plume Centefflne
Source
B-5

-------

Sampling
Applicable to TSDF
Approach
Emission Sources
Transect technology
Active landfills

Surface impoundments

Land treatment

Drum storage area
Transect Technology
•	Not suitable for quiescent or unstable
wind conditions
•	Applicable to disturbed and undisturbed
area sources
•	Applicable to heterogeneous site
Mass Balance Approach

Air emissions

Waste in
ฆ	~
Biodegradation,
adsorption, and
other mechanisms
Waste out

	~



B-6

-------

Sampling
Applicable to TSDF
Approach
Emission Sources
Mass balance
Solvent recovery process

Surface impoundments

Land treatment

Wastewater treatment
Mass Balance Approach
•	Accuracy limited by precision of measurements
•	Difficult for non-steady-state and heterogeneous
waste streams
•	Other competing mechanisms should be quantified
Emission Measurements
PROS
CONS
• Site-specific results
• Affected by site and
ambient conditions
• Standardized methods
• Cost
• Reasonable precision
• Time requirements

• Sensitivity varies
B-7

-------
Estimating Emissions
•	Overview
•	Models for open liquid surfaces
-	Wastewater treatment tanks
-	Surface impoundments
•	Models for porous solids
-	Land treatment
-	Landfills
-	Waste piles
Overview
Why Use Models?
•	Evaluate estimates or measurements
•	Sources to be constructed
•	Measurements impractical or inaccurate
•	Understand factors affecting emissions
•	Sensitivity analysis: bounds on estimates
	• Environmental and health impact analyses
Overview
Modeling Limitations
•	Real system always more complex
•	Uncertainties and effect on accuracy
•	Availability of inputs
-	Parameters describing system
-	Variables (e.g., waste, process)
B-8

-------
Overview
Volatility
•	Concentration in vapor/concentration in waste
•	Henry's law constant for aqueous wastes
•	Measured data available for some compounds
•	Approximated by vapor pressure/solubility
•	For organic liquids, estimate volatility from
vapor pressure and mol fraction in liquid
Overview Examples of Volatility with Equal
Volume of Vapor and Waste
•	Benzene dissolved in water
-	20% in vapor
-	80% in water
•	Benzene dissolved in oil
-	0.2% in vapor
-	99.8% in oil
•	Phenol dissolved in water
-	<0.002% in vapor
-	99.998+% in water
Overview
Emission Potential
•	Quantity of waste, Q
•	Concentration of organics entering source, C
•	Potential emissions = Q x C
•	Models estimate fraction emitted, f
•	Emissions = Q x C x f
B-9

-------
Open liquid surfaces

Modeling Approach


From Surtacซ lo Air
~ Two mechanisms in series

- Through liquid to surface

- From surface to air
i 1 1

• Rate-controlling step
1 1 1

- Liquid phase
Diffusion Through Uquid

- Gas phase
• Other removal mechanisms



- With effluent

- Biodegradation

- Sludge

Effect of Volatility on Emissions from a
Surface Impoundment
(Residence Time of 10 days)

	•	

TJ

-------
Fate of Organics: Emissions,
Effluent, Biodegradation, Sludge
Emissions
Wind
Flow In •
Biodogradation
Sludge
ฆ Flow Out
- Sludge Out
Open liquid surfaces
Mass Transfer Correlations
(Calm Surfaces)
•	Liquid-phase mass transfer
-	Diffusivity in liquid
-	Wind speed
-	Fetch/depth
•	Gas-phase mass transfer
-	Volatility
-	Diffusivity in air
-	Wind speed
-	Diameter
Open liquid surfaces
Mass Transfer Correlations
(Turbulent Surfaces)
•	Developed for mechanical aeration
•	Major parameters
-	Power (hp) to aerators
-	Diffusivities
-	Impeller diameter and speed
•	Combine for calm and turbulert
-	Fraction of area that is calm
-	Fraction that is turbulent
-	Weight coefficient based on fractions
B-ll

-------
Open liquid surfaces
Biodegradation Model
•	Monod kinetics
•	Effect of concentration
•	Biomass concentration
•	Data available for many compounds
Open liquid surfaces
Special Cases
•	Plug flow vs. well mixed
•	Oil-film surface
•	Diffused-air aeration
•	Disposal impoundment
Typical Model Inputs
(Liquid Surfaces)
Waste:
Constituents
Properties
Concentration
Quantities
Oil Content

Process:
Area
Depth
Agitation
Aeration
Flow Type

Site:
Wind Speed
Temperature











Emission Model

I
Emission Estimate
B-12

-------
Model Inputs for a Surface Impoundment
Wind
Berm
Surface Area
Waste
D—ซฆ Waste
Out
Biomass Concentration
Depth
Model Inputs for an Aerated Lagoon
Wind	I
Surface Area -
M:

J y Wasl0 Qul\
i Tfr^^
ฆ,. i ^	^Aeration / I
Waste In	gjomass Concentration	/ ^ P
Porous solids
Modeling Approach
•	Before mixing:
-	Thin layer of waste on surface
-	Use gas-phase mass transfer coefficient
•	After mixing:
-	Air (in soil) and waste at equilibrium
-	Diffusion through air voids to surface
B-13

-------
Air Porosity vs. Total Porosity
Vapors Move in Air
Water
^ Adsorption
onto soil particles
Biodegradation, / n	
if any	Absorption
V	_ into oil and water
Land Treatment Emission Mechanisms
Wind
Volatilization
Diffusion
through pores
Porous solids
Biodegradation
•	Land treatment data available for
benzene and toluene
•	Aqueous data available for many compounds
•	Land treatment biorate extrapolated from
aqueous data
•	Rate is first-order for concentration
B-14

-------
Typical Model Inputs
(Porous Solids)
Emission Model
Site:
Wind Speed
Temperature
Process:
Area
Depth
Application Time
Waste:
Constituents
Properties
Concentration
Quantities
Porosity
Oil Content
Emission Estimate
Model Inputs for Land Treatment
Application Method
Waste Loading Area
Surface Area
Porosity
Model Inputs for a Covered Landfill
Depth
of
Waste

Cap i \
Venls Thickn0SS
C ^ Areaot 8
lง^5ap i
Cap Porosity
Waste Porosity




B-15

-------
Case Study:
Equipment Leaks Testing
EPA Method 21
c-i

-------
OVERVIEW
•	Method 21
•	Instruments and their operation
•	Field monitoring concerns
•	Comparison of available instruments
METHOD 21
•	For Subpart BB - identifies leaks, does not
quantify emissions
•	Promulgated in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A
•	Revised June 22,1990 (55 FR 25602)
METHOD 21 SPECIFICATIONS:
•	Instrument must respond to specific
compounds
•	Scale readable to 2.5% of leak concentration
•	Sample gas flow rate between 0.1 and
3.0 liters per minute
•	Instrument must be rated intrinsically safe
C-2

-------
METHOD 21
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:
*	Response factors less than 10
*	Response time less than 30 seconds
*	Calibration precision equal to or less than
10% of the calibration gas concentration
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
REQUIREMENTS:
*	Response factors needed for each
compound
*	Response time checked initially and
after modifications affecting sample flow
*	Calibration precision checked quarterly
INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR OPERATION
•	Types of Instruments
•	Daily pre-use checks (video)
•	Calibration gases
•	Response factors
C-3

-------
TYPES OF PORTABLE ORGANIC ANALYZERS:
•	Flame ionization
•	Catalytic combustion
•	Photoionization
•	Infrared
FLAME IONIZATION DETECTOR
OPERATING PRINCIPLES:
•	Sample gas is mixed with pure hydrogen
•	Organic vapors form positive ions
during combustion
•	Ions are collected and current flow
is amplified
C-4

-------
SINTERED
METAL
P FLAME
ARRESTOflS
EXHAUST
fuel
filler ano flow
RESTRJCTOW
refill 	
FITTING
SLOE PM> ASST.
SAMPLE HOSE
UUBaiCALCOAC
reaooutAssr
PCK-UP FIXTURE
C-5

-------
PHOTOIONIZATION ANALYZER
OPERATING PRINCIPLES:
•	Organic vapor Is exposed to high
energy UV light
*	Ions are formed, collected, and
amplified
PHOTOIONIZATION LAMP CLEANING:
•	Frequency - when routine response
checks indicate a loss
in sensitivity
•	Procedure - cleaning compounds or
solvents (check with
the instrument supplier)

-------
CATALYTIC COMBUSTION ANALYZER
OPERATING PRINCIPLES:
•	Sample gas exposed to catalyst
coated wire
•	Heat of combustion of organic vapor
changes electrical resistance of wire
•	Change in resistance is detected by
Wheatstone bridge circuit
LB. (muiMfc-Mj .ปซ•> B.uปnr
WM1ATURB
OOU-Mซ
Sulinl Model i •
CซIU In
.VIBRATION
ISO LATINO
RECEPTACLE
OOX3H4SI
^-VasteSkVc
retainer OOOl-eOM
STUD 0001-S06ฉ
REACTION CHAMBER
CNABS9
SUBASSEMBLY
00JJ-4M3
C-7

-------
DAILY PRE-USE CHECKS:
(Video -11 minutes)
•	Battery status
•	Amplifier linearity
•	Probe leak checks
•	Probe/filter deposits
•	Sample gas flow rate
•	Hydrogen pressure
CALIBRATION GASES:
* Flame ionization detectors and catalytic
combustion analyzers
-10,000 ppm methane (n-hexane) in air
- Also suggest 500 ppm in air
CALIBRATION GASES:
• Photoionization analyzers
-	Poor response to methane and n-hexane
-	Other compounds may be used (e.g., benzene)
-	Conversion factors are needed when other
compounds used
C-8

-------
RESPONSE FACTOR DEFINITION:
Response factor = actual conc.
meter reading
EXAMPLE 1
Instrument
nnO
Catalytic combustion
Organic vapor
ซroC>
Methanol
Actual conc.
kdC>
10,000 ppm
Meter reading
[mQ>
5,000 ppm
Response factor
nrC>
2
EXAMPLE 2
Instrument
BOD<>
Flame ionization
Organic vapor
ncC>
o-Chlorotoluene
Actual conc.
irrQ>
3,028 ppm
Meter reading
mO
6,056 ppm
Response factor
hddC>
0.5
C-9

-------

EXAMPLE 3
Instrument
ซmC>
Catalytic combustion
Organic vapor
BOCซC>
1,1,2,2-Tetra
Chloroethane
Actual conc.
nrO
5,980 ppm
Meter reading
ซra>
427 ppm
Response factor
•nooO
14
RESPONSE FACTORS VARY WITH
ORGANIC VAPOR CONCENTRATION
EXAMPLE 1: RESPONSE FACTORS AT
VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS
Instrument	umo Catalytic combustion
Organic vapor ซ>a=c> Methanol
Actual conc. (ppm) innr-tr^^. Response factors


c:.V5000iii
'.'100003
f."2QOQOifl
c-io

-------
EXAMPLE 2: RESPONSE FACTORS AT
VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS
Instrument
inmrฃ> Flame ionization
Organic vapor =ฐc> O-Chlorotoluene
Actual conc. (ppm)	Response factors
I
^ooฃ3
f:>1500jA3
wioom
EXAMPLE 3: RESPONSE FACTORS AT
VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS
Instrument	iocdc> Catalytic combustion
Organic vapor ™ฐc> 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Actual conc. (ppm) idooC> Response factors
JSii
• 1453 IfiS
PUBLISHED RESPONSE FACTOR TABLES
PRESENT ESTIMATED VALUES AT A
CONCENTRATION OF 10,000 ppm
C-ll

-------
RESPONSE FACTOR USE:
•	Response factors used only for selecting
instruments
*	Not used for adjusting meter readings
during leak tests
LIMITATIONS OF PUBLISHED
RESPONSE FACTORS:
*	Less than 300 organic compounds
have been tested
•	There are instrument-to-instrument
variations in response

EXAMPLE 4:
INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS
Instrument
mocO
Flame ionization
Organic vapor
imnQ>
Cyclohexanol
Actual conc.
mooC>
Response factors
(ppm)

Unit #1 Unit #2
^200^

EssHg
ฆ :i2oMj

m ฆ
C-12

-------
EXAMPLE 5:
INSTRUMENT VARIATIONS
Instrument	ซra>
Organic vapor
Actual conc.
(ppm)
;%29ฐ
ฃ150011
- 3000
. wja
: 45002
Catalytic combustion
Meta-xylene
Response factors
Unit #1 Unit #2
FIELD MONITORING CONCERNS:
(Video -17 minutes)
•	Poor capture
•	Gross contamination
•	Adverse weather
•	Potential health and safety hazards
CONTAMINATION RELATED
INSTRUMENT PROBLEMS:
•	Flame ionization detectors
-	flame-out
-	condensation in flame arrestors/sample lines
•	Catalytic combustion analyzers
•	volatilization of catalyst of detector wires
•	condensation in sample lines
•	Photoionization analyzers
-	condensation on lamp window
C-13

-------
HEALTH AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS:
•	Inhalation hazards
-	Keep portable organic analyzer on at all limes to indicate localized areas
where pollutants have accumulated
-	Use relatively long probe so user does not have to be exposed to leak plume
•	Electrical and explosion hazards
-	Use only instruments rated intrinsically safe for class 1, division 1 and
class 2, division 1 conditions
-	Use only instrument recorders which satisfy the above requirements
-	Do not touch rotating shafts with metallic probes or other parts
-	Do not use cigarette lighters to check instrument response
•	Burn hazards
-	Avoid hot surfaces adjacent to equipment being screened
•	Walking and climbing hazards
-	Avoid exposed rotating equipment
-	Avoid equipment more than 2 meters above secure platforms or surfaces
-	Climb ladders properly
COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE
INSTRUMENTS: CRITERIA
•	Method 21 requirements
•	Ease of use
•	Instrument Costs
•	Other concerns
C-14

-------
MEET METHOD 21 REQUIREMENTS
• Response factors
CRITERIA


EASE OF USE

• Response time

• Configuration

• Calibration

• Reliability
CRITERIA


INSTRUMENT COSTS

• Capital

• Operating
C-15

-------
COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS*
Criteria

Analyzer type


Flame
ionization
Photo-
ionization
Catalytic
combustion
Infra-
red
Ease of use




Response time
Fast
Fast
Medium
Slow
Weight (portability)
Heavy
Light
Light
Heavy
Contamination
susceptability
Low
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Configuration
Excellent
Adequate
Adequate
Adequate
Maximum
concentration
capability
Excellent
Adequate
Excellent
Excellent
'A variety of models are available; the comparisons are subjective and
based on experience with a limited number of models.

COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTS (cont)*
Criteria
Analyzer type

Flame
ionization
Photo-
ionization
Catalytic
combustion
Infra-
red
Costs




Capital
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Operating
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Other Concerns




Ruggedness
Good
Good
Good
Good
Maximum hold
feature
No
Yes
No
No
Calibration
Good
Good
Good
Good
Capture Capability
Excellent
Adequate
Moderate
Moderate
'A variety of models are available; the comparisons are subjective and
based on experience with a limited number ot models.
C-16

-------
Case Study:
Computerized Emissions
Models
D-l

-------
COMPUTER MODELS
•	CHEMDAT7 (available)
•	CHEM7 (available)
•	LAND7 (available)
•	Combined model (soon)
—Compiled program
—Automatic assistance
CHEMDAT7
(Lotus 123 Spreadsheet)
•	Surface impoundments • Land treatment
—	aerated	• Active landfills
—	nonaerated	• Capped landfills
—	disposal	• Waste piles
—	oil film
•	Open top tanks
—	aerated
—	nonaerated
CHEM7
•	Compiled program
•	Automatic assistance
•	Provides compound properties
for CHEMDAT7
D-2

-------
LAND7
•	Compiled program
•	Automatic assistance
•	Land treatment
•	Waste piles

COMBINED MODELS
•
Available soon
•
One compiled program
•
Include all major sources
•
Automatic assistance features
•
Structure like LAND7
REFERENCE MATERIALS
•	Emission Model Report
—	Documentation
—	Sample Calculations
—	Background Information
•	User's Guide
—	CHEMDAT7
—	LAND7
Write: USEPA-OAQPS
Petroleum Section - MD-13
Attn: Emission Model Report
RTP.NC 27711
D-3

-------
CASE STUDY: LAND7
•	LAND7 menu
•	Important inputs
•	Example calculations (land treatment)

m immn mmmmwt
Bring up help screens to explain procedures
MAIN MENU - make selection wtih cursor
FILE COMPOUND UNIT PRINT
QUIT
ACTIVE FR.E: aspen\DEFAULT
assistance r>o( enabled
number UggedO
.26:51	memory: 115*06 string spaoe: 15638 binary

| Bring up help screens to explain procedures
HELP MENU iruka wloctton wtth cmw
I GENERAL | FILE COMPOUND UNIT PRINT
UNIFAC	DATA	
| GENERAL HELP INSTRUCTIONS |b
	Press any key (except cursor keys) to end help menu.	
Select the desired procedure by using the main menu.
Use the cur*or keys to move the highlighted locator.
Preas [ENTER] (or [RETURN]) or any other key to implement procedure.
Press [Fl] to view HELP screens when usJng the program.
Press [ESC] to return to the procedure you wish to perform.
You can rapkfly scan all menu options by pressing [ENTER) or [down]
ts a menu option and moving across the main menu tMes wfth the
[right] or [teh] cursor control keys.
	PRESS [0] TO KUL THE PROGRAM FROM HELP	

726:55
memory • 10360 string space • 14690 Unary
=ฃ1
Figure 1. MAIN menu.
Figure Z HELP menu.
D-4

-------
uu-mLUUiit i-i^cgpcT

PRESS (ESC) TO RETURN TO MENU
-JT
MAIN MENU •• mako wtectton wtth cursor
if
HELP fFim COMPOUND UNIT PRINT QUIT
SELECT UST
Recover case study
Save current case study
Set the screen specifications
Add another compound to data set
Change the name oI the case stud)
USE 1EKITERI TO SELECT ITEM
PRESS [ESC) FOR NO SELECTION
728:03	mo mo ly - 103044 itrtng ipac* • 14S&4 binary
Figure 3. FILE menu.
| Tag and edit selected compounds and properties
——(I MAIN MENU -ฆ mako wtoctten wtthcurwr If-

HELP FILE ICOMPOUNCj UNIT PRINT QUIT
COMPOUND OPTION UST
ITAQ COMPOUNDS IN WASTE
eorr a tagged compound
EOfT UN IF AC PARAMETERS
CHECK DATA OF ALL TAGGED COMPOUNDS
CHECK DATA OF A TAGGED COMPOUND
COMPUTER FILLS IN DATA OF ALL TAGGED
COMPARE DATA CALCULATIONS OF ALL TAGGED
SAVE TAGGED DATA IN MASTER FILE
USE (ENTER) TO SELECT ITEM
PRESS (ESC) FOR NO SELECTION
729:07	memory - 103182 itrtng ipac* • 15032 Unary
Figure 4. COMPOUND menu.


Specify conditions of land treatment facility
i Yซ
MAIN MENU - makป Mfedton wtth curtor ||—
HELP FtLE COMPOUND |UNIT| PRINT QUIT
UNIT OPTIONS
1 SPECIFY LAND TREATMENT CONDITIONS |
Sp#dfy compound cooo*nualionซ
ESTIMATE LAND TREATMENT RATES
USE (ENTER] TO SELECT ITEM
PRESS (ESC] FOR NO SELECTION
729:42
memory - 103162 tiring tpac* - 15002 binary

s.&tM

Print the results ol the calculations
MAIN MENU •• rruk# Miction wflh curwr fP
J

HELP RLE COMPOUND UNIT fPRiNTl QUIT
PRINT LIST
Print report ol case study
Select printer type
USE |ENTER] TO SELECT ITEM
PRESS (ESCI FOR NO SELECTION
memory - 103192 string space ฆ 15032 binary Jf
Figure 5. UNfT menu.
Figure 6. PRINT menu.
D-5

-------
Quit the program and return to DOS
HELP
MAIN MENU - make selection wkh curtor 11
FILE COMPOUND UNIT PRINT lOUITl
CAUTION
IF YOU CONTINUE YOU WILL EXIT THE PROGRAM
Have you saved your work?
ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO EXfT?
30:19	memory- 103212 stringspace - 15052 binary JC
Figure 7. QUIT menu.
INPUTS: POROUS MODEL
•	Time surface is exposed
•	Concentrations
•	Area and depth
•	Oil content
•	Temperature
•	Air and total porosity
D-6

-------
EXAMPLE OF LAND7 INPUTS

SPECIFIED PARAMETERS FOR LAND TREATMENT

wind (cm/s)
447
Temp (C)
25
011 content of waste (fraction!
.1
concentration of compound (ppm)
0
Time between applications (days)
30
Waste loading (g o1l/cc soil)
.034
Thickness of contaminated soil (cm)
20
Area of land treatment (m2)
24964
Aqueous waste, >1
0
Blomass density
.00179
Total porosity
.61
A1r porosity
.5
width of land treatment area (meters)
158
length of land treatment area (meters)
158
amount of waste applied (gallons)
450000
fraction liquid 1n waste
.1
BENZENE 5 ppmw

STATUS CHECK

Area of land treatment (m2) 1s relatively large.

D-7

-------
EXAMPLE OF LAND7 RESULTS
SOURCE: land treatment
COMPOUND: BENZENE

Equilibrium Keq
biological time const days-1
maximum fraction blodegraded
fraction blodegraded during time period
fraction emitted during time period
residual concentration In oil (ppmw)
diffusion coef cm2/s
emission rate during time period (g/s)
(Mg/year)
emission factor (g/cm2-s)
2.123418E-02
29.42251
.0930385
9.282061E-02
.9064917
3.43848E-03
2.351761E-02
2.968397E-04
9.361136E-03
1.189071E-12
Short term emissions, first day (g/s)
Peak emissions, fifteen minutes (g/s)
3.599377E-03
1.766045E-02
The reference emission factor 1s 1.252787E-12
g/cm2-sec.
COMPOUND PROPERTIES OF BENZENE

Type of compound A aromatic
density (g/cc)
molecular weight
diffusion coef. air (cm2/s)
vapor pressure (mm Hg)
Henry's law constant (atm m3/mol)
vapor pressure temp, coefficients
blorate constant Kmax (mg/g-l-hr)
UNIFAC code
.87
78.1
.088
95.2
.0055
6.905
1211.033
220.79
19
16:00000000000
STATUS CHECK

The estimated vapor diffusion coefficient 1s .1173281 cm2/s
The estimated vapor pressure 1s 95.02693 mm Hg.
D-8

-------
CASE STUDY: CHEMDAT7
•	CHEMDAT7 menu
•	Important inputs
•	Example calculations
-	Activated sludge
-	Impoundment (as time permits)
-	Landfill (as time permits)
CHEMDAT7 MAIN MENU
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Go to data entry forms.
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Go to a portion ot worksheet (Results).
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Select compounds or rearrange order.
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Print a portion ol worksheet.
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Select which models to use.
DATA-FORMS VIEW SORT PRINT SELECT HELP QUIT
Look at instructional screen.
CHEMDAT7HELP MENU
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
View general help screen information.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Help in selecting (he data for your unit.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Discussion ol data entry for new compounds or properties.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Information for the use of the land treatment model.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Information for the use of the landfill model.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO-RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Information for the use of biological reaction rates.
GENERAL MODEL DATA LANDTREAT LANDFILL BIO RATE IMPOUND QUIT
Information for the use of the impoundment model.
D-9

-------
DATA FORMS
IMPOUND AERATED CLOSED-LF OPEN-LF/WP LAND-TREAT
CONC IMPORT DEFAULT
IMPOUND: Use for impoundments and open tanks that
are not mechanically agitated or aerated.
AERATED: Use for agitated tanks and impoundments.
CLOSED-LF: Closed or capped landfills.
OPEN-LF/WP: Open, active landfills and waste piles.
LAND-TREAT: Land treatment.
CONC: Use differing concentrations for compounds.
IMPORT: Import compound data.
DEFAULT: Put in default parameters.
INPUTS:
OPEN LIQUID SURFACES
•	Quantity or flow rate
•	Concentrations
•	Area and depth
•	Aeration rate
•	Agitation parameters
•	Windspeed
D-10

-------
CHEMDAT7 RESULTS FOR QUIESCENT IMPOUNDMENT
(all concentrations at 10 ppm)
NON-AERATED WASTEWATER TREATMENT
WINDSPEEO
4.47
n/s
depth
1.8
0
AREA
1500
02
FLOW
0.00156
m3/s
VO Inlet conc.
10
mg/1
TOTAL ORGAN ICS IN
250
mg/1
ACTIVE BIOMASS
0
0/1
BIOMASS SOLIDS IN
0
0/1
TEMPERATURE
25
deg. C
AL AIR EMISSIONS
2.61
Mg/yr

EFFLUENT
EMISS.
BIOL.
PHOTOL.ADSORB.
, air
COMPOUND NAME



& HYDRO.

eralss.






(Mg/yr)
bฃN2ฃllฃ
0.199
0.801
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.3943
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0.210
0.790
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.3887
HETHANOL
0.523
0.477
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.2345
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
0.251
0.749
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.3688
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
0.181
0.819
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.4031
PHENOL
0.895
0.105
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0518
TETRACHLOROETHLYENE
0.218
0.782
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.3847
TOLUENE
0.213
0.787
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.3873
D-ll

-------
CHEMDAT7 RESULTS FOR AERATED IMPOUNDMENT
(all concentrations at 10 ppm)
AERATED WASTEWATER TREATMENT
WINDSPEED
4.47
m/s
DEPTH
1.8
D
AREA
1500
m2
FLOW
0.031
m3/s
ACTIVE BIOMASS
0.3
0/1
BIOMASS SOLIDS IN
0
0/1
VO INLET CONC.
10
mg/1
TOTAL ORGAN ICS IN
250
mg/1
TOTAL BIORATE
19
tng/g b1o-hr
FRACT. AGITATED
0.247

SUBMERGED AIR FLOW
0
m3/s
Number Impellers
1

Oxygen trans, rat.
3
1b02/h-hp
POWR (total)
75
HP
Power efficiency
0.85

Temperature
25
deg C
Impeller d1a
61
cm
Impeller speed
126
rad/s
RELATIVE AERATED WASTEWATER VOC PAT
EFFLUENT EMISS. BIOL. PHOTOL.ADSORB, air .
COMPOUND NAME



& HYDRO.
em1ss.
(Mg/yr)
BENZENE
0.016
A.621
0.163
0.000 0.0002
8.0283
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0.015
0.842
0.143
0.000 0.0003
8.2340
METHANOL
0.381
0.085
0.531
0.000 0.0026
0.B299
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
0.224
0.508
0.266
0.000 0.0016
4.9678
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
0.019
0.926
0.055
0.000 0.0002
9.0565
PHENOL
0.011
0.000
0.989
0.000 0.0001
0.0028
TETRACHLOROETHLYENE
0.017
0.902
0.081
0.000 0.0003
B.8196
TOLUENE
0.015
0.729
0.256
0.000 0.0003
7.1275
D-12

-------
CASE STUDY
PROCESS VENT RULE
APPLICABILITY
and
COMPLIANCE
Presented at
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Workshop on
Air Emissions from Waste Management Facilities
E-l

-------
PROCESS VENT CASE STUDY
Review of RCRA Air Emission Standard for Process Vents
Hazardous Waste TSDF Operations
Situation
The XYZ Manufacturing Company operates various manufacturing processes that
generate approximately 1,000 tons of hazardous waste per year. This qualifies the XYZ
Manufacturing Company as a large quantity generator under RCRA . The facility is a
RCRA TSDF operating under interim status. As the owner/operator of the facility, you are
required to:
1)	determine the applicability of the RCRA air rules for process vents (i.e.,
40 CFR 265, Subpart AA) to the hazardous waste management unit emission
sources at the facility,
2)	determine compliance status of current process vent emissions and emission
controls in relation to the control requirements in 40 CFR 265, Subpart AA,
3)	determine what action can be taken to comply with the regulation, H the
emission reductions are required under the process vents standards.
E-2

-------
Determinations
Determine which process vents are subject to the
requirements of Subpart AA and why. For each
process vent identified In Figure 1 and 2, circle all
of the following statements that are correct (note:
some vents will have more than one applicable
statement; all relevant and appropriate choices
should be drcled)
a.
b.
c.
d.
Vent is a process vent associated with one of
the unit operations specified In the rule that
manages a hazardous waste with organic
concentration of greater than 10 ppmw and
therefore is subject to the requirements of
Subpart AA.
Vent is not a process vent as defined In the rule
and therefore is not subject to the requirements
of Subpart AA.
The operation/process associated with the vent
is nol one of the unit operations specified in
Subpart AA applicability (Section 265.1030(b)),
or
The passage of gases (i.e., vent emissions) into
the atmosphere is not process related. For
example, emissions are caused by tank loading
and unloading (wording losses) rather than the
process or unit operation.
Vent is not subject to the requirements of
Subpart AA because the waste managed In the
unit has an organic concentration concentration
of less than 10 ppmw.
Vent is not subject to the requirements of
Subpart AA because the operation/process unit
associated with the vent is not subject to RCRA
Subtitle C or is exempt from RCRA permitting.
Vent

Vent

No.
Answers
No.
Answers
1
a,b,c^>
10
a$,c,d
2
a,6,c -1
11
a.frc.d
3
a.ง.cj
12
a.Q.c.d
4'
e.b.c.d
13
a,$,c,d
5
a,$,c,d
14
6.c,d


Comments
a.	The process vent rules apply only to (hose
waste management units or unit operations
that are specified in the rules. Affected unit
operations Include: distillation, fractionation,
thin-film evaporation, solvent extraction,
steam stripping and air stripping.
Vents on control devices (e.g., condensers
and carbon adsorbers) and on tanks serving
the affected unit operations (e.g., distillate
receivers, bottoms receivers, surge control
tanks, decant separator tanks, or hot wells)
are also subject to the standards if emission
from the process are vented through them
(e.g., uncondensed overhead vapors from a
distillation operation).
b.	A process vent means any open-ended pipe
or stack that is vented to the atmosphere
either directly, through a vacuum-producing
system, or through a tank or air pollution
control device. Emissions (i.e., gases or
fumes) must be process-related such as
evaporation produced by heating or caused by
mechanical means such as a vacuum-
producing system.
c.	The process vent rules apply to affected units
managing hazardous waste with a total
organic concentration of 10ppmw or greater
on an annual average basis. Units managing
wastes with an annual average of less than
10ppmw are not subject to the rules.
d.	If the unit is exempt from RCRA Subtitle C, it
is not subject to the requirements of Subpart
AA. Examples of types of RCRA exempt
units are listed below:
•	Units such as product (not hazardous waste)
distillation columns generating organic
hazardous waste still bottoms are not subject
to the standards while the wastes are in the
product distillation column unit.
•	Elementary neutralization and wastewater
treatment tanks as defined by 40 CFR 260.10.
•	Units managing Subtitle D wastes or
nonhazardous wastes.
•	Generators that accumulate hazardous waste
in tanks and containers for 90 days or less.
E-3

-------
2. Calculate the total (acflity process vent emission Total Facility ER Is equal to the sum
rate (ER). emission rates for all Individual process
vents located at the facility that are subject
Case 1: to the requirements ot Subpart AA.
ER(Hour1y)~
^R(Annual)m ^^tftcBKy ™ ~^pvt
Case 2:
ER(Homty)"
ER(AnnuiI)"
Process Vent Emission Rate (ER) and ODeratlna Hour(OH) Data:
Casซ 1:


Vซnt W.f
1
2
3
4
5
8
7
8
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ERflfcrtw)
OJ
6.1
007
0.40
o.te
1.0
0.20
0.12
12
0.13
0.06
6.1
8.9
12
0.13
OA*
1J5
OHfhijyr)
4160
4160
8760
2000
8760
2000
8760
2000
2000
0760
2000
4160
2000
2000
2000
4160
2000
Efifloryyr}
10.3
12.7
0J1
0.49
0.7
1.0
0.08
0.12
12
0.57
0.06
12.7
e.s
1-2
0.13
1.7
1.3
Casfl 2:


Vซnt H J
1
2
3
4
8
8
7
8
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17


0.1
5.2
an
1.0
0.18
OA
0.08
0.11
1.0
0.15
005
4.5
0.0
1.1
0.15
1.7
22
OH(hrfyr)
4180
4160
0760
4000
8760
4000
8760
2000
2000
8760
2000
4160
2000
2000
2000
4180
2000

16.8
10.8
048
2.0
0.78
1JS
0.35
0.11
1.0
0.66
0.09
0.3
0.0
1.1
0.15
3 3
22



E-4

-------
3. Based on ttie total ladllty process vent emission
After identifying all affected process
rate (ER) calculated above. Identify which course
vents, you must determine whether the total
of action Irom among those listed below, Is
facility affected process vent emission rate
required:
Is below the emission rate limits (see

operating data under #2 and compliance
a. ER below emission rate limits; therefore, no
criteria given below.)
emission reduction required.


If the total facility process vent emission
b. ER above emission rate limits; must reduce
rate for hourly or yearly emissions exceeds
omissions from each Individual process
the limits In the regulation, then some type
vent by 95%,
action must be taken to reduce emissions
below the limits, if the emission rats limits
c. ER above emtsslon rate limits; must reduce
cannot be attained, total facility process vent
total facility process vent emissions by 95%.
emissions must be reduced, by 95% or

more, through use of a control device.
d. ER above emtsslon rate limits; but can control

one or more vents to get below limits.

e. ER above emission rate limits; but can reduce

operating hours In order to get below the

limits.

Compliance Criteria

TotaJ facility process vent emission rate must be below the following emission rate limits:
Short Term - < 1.4 Kg/ft (3 Ib/ti) AND Long Term - < 2.8 Mgfyr (3.1 short tons/yr)
Recommended

Control Action

Case 1:

Case 2:

E-5

-------
Figure 1. Case Study Facility XYZ
mi
To Manufacturing
Operations
Manufacturing

Operations


Dtellllajton



Column


Generating

DJstlalate
Solve rt tn
Receiver
Sotvan
DBUQaton
Rafltnaie
Column
Sotvenl
DtetlltaJd
vacuum Pump
Receiver
a Hazardous
Was] a
Waste
r
Decanter
Storage
Tank
Carbon
Adsorber
Boiler
Clanfer
Plate and Frame
Finer Prese
Distillate
Reeehfer
Hazardous
Waste
Storage
Tank
Ptant
Waste
To Land Disposal
(Less Than 90
Day Accumulaiton)
Fitter CaVe
Decanter
(aqueous waste
< 8ppmw)
Steam
Stripper
To Land Disposal
Y V YV
To Wm
To WWT
(See Figure 2)
(See Figure 2)
vent Id No
Condenser
To Manufacturing
Operations
Note: Organic concentration of all streams (unless otherwise noted): 1.000 - 900.000 ppmw
Organic concentration of wastewater treatment (WWT) plant streams: <9 ppmw

-------
Primary
Clartfler
Hazardous Wastewater
(From Figure 1) 	
to WWT
Storage
Tank
Neutralization
M
Air
Strip pei
Air
Sludge
Holding
Tank
Plate and Frame
Filter Press yv
Secondary
i ClarBer ,
Aeration
To
NPDES
Discharge
To Land Disposal
Key
HI Vent Id No.	Note: Organic concentration of wastewater treatment (WWT) plant streams: < 9 ppmw
ft Vent
Figure 2. Case Study Facility XYZ Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWT)
with NPDES Permit

-------
CASE STUDY
APPLICATION
Of
BENZENE WASTE OPERATIONS NESHAP
to
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
Presentation Slides
F-l

-------
GENERAL STANDARDS
• Facilities with 10 Mg/yr or more total annual benzene in waste
treat and control certain waste streams
• Treat identified waste streams to remove or destroy benzene
• Apply organic emission controls prior to and during treatment
to achieve treatment requirements
WHAT ARE THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS?
• Reduce benzene concentration to less than 10 ppmw
• Remove or destroy benzene by 99% or more
• Dilution of wastes to meet requirements is prohibited
• Mixing of wastes is allowed to facilitate treatment in
"wastewater treatment system " with special requirements
WHAT IS A "WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM"?
•	... a unit that ultimately discharges under NPDES permit
•	Manages certain wastes:,
-*	Process wastewater
->	Product tank drawdown
->	Landfill leachate
->	Wastes mixed with any of these
•	Typically includes:
-ป	Individual drain systems
->	Oil-water separators
-ป	Dissolved air floatation (DAF) units
—>	Equalization tanks
->	Biological treatment units
F-2

-------
Got
Ptonl
DW.
Col.
004
FCCU
Product
lorik
. 005 .
(Coker!
to Dbchorge
Plant lay-out of ABC Ofl Refinery.
WHAT ARE THE SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS?
• All units comprising the wastewater treatment system must use
organic emission controls except for those units where both the:
(1)	Benzene concentration of wastewater entering unit is
less than 10 ppmw benzene
and
(2)	Total annual benzene quantity in wastewaters first entering
all uncontrolled wastewater treatment system units facility-wide
is less than 1 Mg/yr
• Benzene in wastewaters entering an "enhanced biodegration unit"
is excluded from the calculation of total annual benzene quantity
Product
Tankage
Drainage System
[Process 1—ป
Units P+
Leachate
Ground-
water .
Oil/Water
Separator
24
DAF
20 ppa*
Unit
11 MiAr
Rainwater/Runoff L	
Drainage System: |
0 004 Vj/jr. 0.02 ppmw |
Equalization
Basin
4J ppaซ
0 003 Uc/tt.
/jr.
2 ppm*
0.01 pea*
/ Storm \
Surface
Impoundment
A Basin )
o.e ui/jt
0.4 ppra
Polishing
Pond
Discharge
o.ou ux/r
Figure I. Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations
and flow rales: Example \.
F-3

-------
WHAT IS AN "ENHANCED BIODEGRADA TION UNIT"?
• Wastewater treatment system unit that:
-> Uses a suspended growth process
-ป	Generates biomass
->	Uses recycled biomass
-ป	Periodically removes biomass
• Examples of processes not considered enhanced
-> Large, shallow biological impoundments
-> Attached growth processes such as trickling filters
or rotating biological contactors
Drainage System
Product
Tankage
Process
Units
8 ppm*
4.6 ppm*
20 ppm*
Leachate
Cround-
water ,
Storm
Basin
Rainwater/Runoff
Drainage System:
! 0.004 Ui/jr, 0.02 ppm*
Clarifier)
Mix
Box
DAF
Unit
Activated
Sludge
Tank
Oil/Water
Separator
Equalization
Basin
Discharge
0.014 Kf/yr
Figure 2. Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations
and (low rates: Example 2.
Product
Tankage
Drainage System
Process
Units
Leachate'
Ground-
water ,
16 Ui/jrr.
10 ppm*




> Oil/Water
e Ui/jr,
5 ppm*
DAF
0 ซ UjfT-.
0.5 ppm*
Separator

Unit

Basin fl
0.6 Vi/jr:
0.6 ppmv
0.5 Mf/jr
0.9 ppm*
Equalization
Basin #2
0.5 Mj/jrr;
0.1 ppm*
Activated
Sludge


Tank
Discharge
Return audjt
0.07 Ht/jrr: /*	0.OM M(/jrr;
0,02 ppmป (	\ 0.003 ppm*
MClarilier)-
0.000 Vi/fr, 0.01 ppm*
Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations and
mass flow rates. Example 3.
F-4

-------
CASE STUDY
APPLICATION
of
BENZENE WASTE OPERATIONS NESHAP
to
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
Presented at
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Workshop on
Air Emissions from Waste Management Facilities

-------
CASE STUDY:
APPLICATION OF NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARD FOR BENZENE WASTE OPERATIONS
TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
OVERVIEW
This case study provides examples of the application of the National Emission Standard for
Benzene Waste Operations (40 CFR 61 Subpart FF) to wastewater treatment systems. The standards
for wastewater treatment systems that manage and treat aggregated or mixed waste streams are
reviewed using some simple examples. Then, a case study problem Is presented to Illustrate the
application of the standard to a 'real world' wastewater treatment system at a petroleum refinery.
STANDARDS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
The Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP requires owners and operators of affected facilities at
which the total annual benzene quantity from the facility waste Is equal to or greater than 10 Mg/yr to
remove or destroy benzene contained In certain waste streams using a treatment process or wastewater
treatment system. Section 61.348 of the rule establishes the treatment standards for treatment
processes or wastewater treatment systems. These standards require that If an owner or operator
chooses to aggregate or mix waste streams to facilitate treatment In a wastewater treatment system, then
the waste streams must be treated In a wastewater treatment system thai meets special requirements.
Each waste management unit that comprises the wastewater treatment systems at the facility must use
the appropriate emission controls as specified under Sections 61.343 through 61.347 urttf both of the
following conditions are met
1.	The waste entering an uncontrolled unit Is less 10 ppmw benzene;
and
2.	The total facility-wide wastewater treatment system annual benzene quantity first entering any
uncontrolled unit Is less than 1 Mg/yr.
Application of Basic Standards
Figure 1 Illustrates the application of the basic standards. The drainage system, the oil/water
separator and the dissolved air flotation (DAF) unit shown in Figure 1 require controls because they
receive waste with benzene concentrations of 10 ppmw or higher. The next three units require controls
because, even though the benzene concentration Is below 10 ppmw, the mass flow rate of benzene
(i.e., the annual benzene quantity) entering the units Is greater than 1 Mg/yr.
Enhanced Blodeoradation Units
There Is one major exclusion to the 1 Mg/yr benzene quantity limit. The rule excludes the benzene
quantity entering an "enhanced biodegradation' unit from the total annual benzene quantity Inventory for
1he wastewater treatment system If the enhanced biod ฉgradation unit is the first exempt unit.
Section 61.348(b)(2)(ll)(B) provides guidelines regarding operating conditions for what is defined as
"enhanced Wodegradatlon" unit. These guidelines basically describe the operation of a conventional
activated sludge wastewater treatment process. Activated sludge systems with benzene concentrations
of 10 ppmw or higher In any Influent stream will still require controls, but H the benzene concentration is
less than 10 ppmw, the annual benzene quantity entering an activated sludge system does not count
towards the 1 Mg/yr control limit. Therefore, If we replace the surface Impoundment In Figure 1 with an
activated sludge system (refer to Figure 2), no controls are then required after the equalization basin.
F-6

-------
Drainage System
Product
Tankage
Process
Units
40 ppow
Storm
Basin
j Rouiwaici / nuuun
[Drainage System:
| 0.004 Ht/yr; 0.02ppm*
0.001 Ui/yr!
legend:
IndkftUi unit aol requiring eonl/eU
undtr 40 CFR 61 Subpart 77
lodicatw unit requirini controls becausa
beniene conctnlralioa excieds 10 ppm
Polishing
Pond
Discharge
DAF
Unit
Leachate
Ground-
water	,
rrm _ lndkปlซ unit r*qulrin| coclrelt bซcauiซ	0.014
nut nซซ rtl* of bcaseiM ticซซdj 1 Ui/fr
Figure 1. Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations
and flow rates: Example 1.
Drainage System
Product
Tankage
Process
Units
Leachate
Ground-
water
49 Ut/jr.
0 ppm*.
OiyWater
Separator
24 U|/yr;
DAF
.Unit
7.2 Wi/yr;
20 ppm*
0 ppmซ
Rainwater/Runoff
Drainage System:
. 0.004 k|/jrr; 0.02 ppm*
l^gfnri;
I I . IndicaUi unit Dot requlri&i conUqb
1—1 un
-------
Drainage System
Product
Tankage
Units
Leachate
Ground
water
15 Ut/fT.
10 ppm*
Oil/Water
Separator
0 Uc/yr
5 ppm*
I)AF
Unil
0 J Ui/rr.
0.5 ppm*


VO.e Ui/jt;
1.0,6 ppm*
Equalization
Basin 82
Equalization
Basin ง\
0 5 Vi/yr.
0.3 ppm*
0.5 Ui/yr:
0.5 ppm*
Activated
Sludge


Tank
0.0T Uj/yr;
0.02 ppm*
Return SIud|(
Clarilier
o.ooa Ui/rr.
0.003 ppm*
Discharge
0.006 Ug/yr; 0.01 ppm*
Figure 3. Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations and
mass flow rates. Example 3.
Product
Tankage
*5ฉ
M
Process
Units

rtasrat; X'fS-
llll
8 U^/yr
5 ppm*
1
j 0.8 Ut/yr. i
1 0.6 ppm* fi
iii

1 1
Ground-
water
—h jO.fl Uf/yr;
|0,fl ppm*
Equalization
Basin fZ
ฃ
0.5 Ut/yn
0.3 ppm*
0.5 Ui/yr:
0.5 ppm*
Activated
Sludge


Tank
1 0.07 Ut/yr;	\ 0.000 Ht/yr:
0.02 ppm* /	0.003 ppra*
			MClaruicr
Legend:
Return Sludft:
0.006 Uf/yr; 0.01 ppm*
Discharge
| | • lndicttซi uttit Dol re^uiri&i eo&trelf ucdtr 40 CFR 61 Subpart fT
f**"! ฆ Indicilei unit nquirlo| eantrob became faeuene coacentralioa esceedi 10 ppm
PTil • tadicilei unit requirim coot/ob bccauie bemene mau flo* rate exceed* IMt/fr
|' | ฆ Indicates unit requiiin| coot/ol* because facility-vide uDcaotrollcd betueoe quuUty eicccdi lU^/yr
Figure 3a. Wastewater treatment system showing benzene concentrations and
mass (low rates. Example 3; Solution A.
Drainage System
Product
Tankage
Process
Units
Leachate
Ground-
water
i-r'W
:iil9 ppป*j;U
-(X&izsjflfr
0U$rซl%
-.Separator
ซ W|/fT.
Ill
08 Ut/yr
0.5 ppm*
* -*•: j



Equalization
Basin ง\
ป. uซ/r;
|J||i -iO.O ppm*
0-5 U|/jt;
0.3 ppm*
Equaur
([{Basin
tlllllllllHIli
ipii
ation
il
0.5 Ut/jr.
O S ppm*
Activated
Sludge
Taidc

0.006 U(/rr:
0.003 ppm
0.07 Ui/yr.
O.02
Clar uier
Discharge
Return Sludge;
0.008 U
-------
CASE STUDY
SITUATION
The ABC Oil Company operates a refinery that is determined to have a total annual benzene (TAB)
quantity greater than 10 Mg/yr and, therefore, the refinery owner/operator is required to manage the
benzene-containing waste streams in controlled units and treat the waste to comply with the National
Emission Standard tor Benzene Waste Operations (40 CFR 61 Subpart FF). As shown Figure 4, the
refinery already operates an advanced wastewater treatment system capable of treating the refinery
wastewater streams to meet the Section 61.348 treatment standards. As owner/operator of the ABC Oil
Company you must now decide which of the units comprising your wastewater treatment system must
use controls to comply with the standards.
PROBLEM
Identify which waste management units comprising the refinery wastewater treatment system require
controls. Possible answers (or each waste management unit are:
a.	No controls required
b.	Controls required: Benzene concentration entering the unit is 10 ppmw or more
c.	Controls required: TAB quantity entering the unit is 1 Mg/yr or more
d.	Controls required: Total TAB quantity managed in exempt wastewater treatment
units at refinery Is 1 Mg/yr or more
For each waste management unit shown in Figure 5, circle all correct answers (more than one
answer may be correct (or a particular unit).
1.
Individual Drain Systems
a
b
c
d
2.
Sour Water Stripper
a
b
c
d
3.
Oil/Water Separator
a
b
c
d
4.
DAF Unit
a
b
c
d
5.
Primary Clarifier
a
b
c
d
6.
Equalization Basin
a
b
c
d
7.
Activated Sludge Tank
a
b
c
d
8.
Secondary Clarifier
a
b
c
d
9.
Trickling Filter
a
b
c
d
10.
Clarifier
a
b
c
d
11.
Polishing Pond
a
b
c
d
F-9

-------
Crude Oil
Product
Tank
v 002 ,
Product
Tank
. 001 v
Hydro
.Treaty
Reformer)
Dist.
Col.
Product
Tank
v 003 ,
Product
Tank
v 004 /
f-tydro
Jreat^
/de-v
vSaft,
FCCU
*r* Lube
ฆ/V. Oil
;ooiii
Producl
Tank
v 006 .
Product
Tank
v 005 >
[Coker]
Fower
'Slop-Oil
V. Tank J
DAF Unit
Sour-
Water
Strippej
Trickling
Fitter
f—-v (Clarifierr
Settling]
v Tank k—'P—' <•
Oewatering
Unit
.t	
™* JT	
Activated
Sludge Tank
Polishing
Pond
Equalization
Basin
Primary
Clarifier
Aerobic
Digest or
Wastewater
Process Fluids
	 Sludge
Figure 4. Plant lay-out of ABC Oil Refinery.
1. individual Drain Systems
* Ug/yr
8 ppm*
Product
Tankag
300 Ug/yr
100 ppm*
Process
Units
Leachate
6 Ug/yr
8 ppm
Water
Stripper
0.5 Ug/yr
1 ppm*
Recovered
0U
Equalization
Basin

7
5 Mj/yr
ActivaLed
1.6 ppmw
Sludge


Tank
6.2 Ug/yr
2 ppraw
i ug/y
0.3 ppm*
3
Oil/Water
Separator
22 Ug/yr
10 ppmw
4
DAF
Unit

6 Ug/yr
3 ppmw
Recycled
Sludge
8
econdar
Clarifier
Primary
Clarifier
Sludge
Trickling
Filter
I lo solids
0.3 Mg/yr
1 handling j
0.1 ppm
1.5 Ue/yr
0.75 Ug/yr
n
Polishing
Pond
2 ppmw
I ppm*
Clarifier
0 75 Ug/yr
0.2 ppm*
Discharge
Figure 5. Wastewater treatment- system showing benzene concentrations and
mass flow rates: Case Study.
F-10

-------
SEPA
BENZENE WASTE
OPERATIONS NESHAP
G-l

-------
Purpose
To summarize the major requirements of the
NESHAP for benzene waste operations
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
G-2

-------
Overview
Background
•	Benzene waste rule one of last under "old
Section 112"
•	Rules promulgated March 7, 1990
(45 FR 8292)
•	Impacts of standards
-	Reduce benzene emissions from 6,000
to 450 Mg/yr
-	Reduce maximum risk from 2 x 10"3 to
5 x 10"5
-	Reduce annual cancer incidence from
0.6 to 0.05
Overview
Regulatory Approach
•	Identify facilities whose benzene
emissions pose public health problem
•	Identify waste streams that create
benzene emission problem
•	Treat identified waste streams to remove
or destroy benzene
•	Apply organic emission controls prior to
and during treatment
G-3

-------
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
Applicability
Which Facilities Require Control?
•	Specific industrial categories
-	Chemical manufacturing plants
• Petroleum refineries
-	Coke by-product recovery plants
-	Offsite TSDF that receive wastes
from the above facilities
•	Facilities with >10 Mg/yr total annual
benzene in waste (TAB)
•	Only wastes with >10% water included in
TAB determination
Applicability
What Is a Waste?
•	Waste defined very broadly
(CAA 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Kb)
•	Excluded Wastes
-	Wastes in the form of gases
and vapors
-	Segregated stormwater streams
-	Certain in-process recycle streams
G-4

-------
Applicability
How Is TAB Determined?
•	Determine waste flow and benzene
concentration at "point of generation"
-	Knowledge of waste or process
-	Direct measurement
•	Based on the following for each waste
ฃ10% water:
-	Total annual quantity of waste
-	Annual average benzene
concentration
Applicability
Total Annual Benzene in Waste (TAB)
TAB = ฃ (Q. C.)
i=1
Q = annual waste quantity
C = annual average benzene concentration
n = number of affected waste streams with
>10% water content
Applicability
What Is Point of Generation?
•	Where substance first becomes a waste
-	Prior to losses due to emissions
-	Prior to mixing
-	Prior to any waste treatment
•	Can occur after a process unit or waste
management unit
•	Definition does not allow wastes to be
excluded from rule
•	Pollution prevention that eliminates waste
or reduces benzene allowed
G-5

-------
Applicability
Which Waste Streams Require
Control?
• Generally, streams with >10 ppmw
benzene at point of generation
• Exclusions for certain process
wastewater streams
Applicability

What Is Process Wastewater?
• Water that contacts benzene within manufacturing
process unit

• Certain waste streams are not process
wastewater

- Organic wastes
- .Cooling tower

blowdown
- Process fluids
- Steam trap

condensate
- Product tank drawdown
- Landfill leachate
Applicability
What are the Process Wastewater
Exclusions?
•	Waste streams less than 0.02 Lymin or
10 Mg/yr
•	Waste streams >10 ppmw benzene if
process wastewater TAB less than
1 Mg/yr for combination of:
-	TAB in untreated streams at point of
generation
-	TAB in treated streams at exit to
treatment unit
G-6

-------
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
Control Requirements
Overview
•	Affected wastes treated to remove or
destroy benzene
•	Control air emissions from management
units prior to and during treatment
•	Mixing of wastes to facilitate treatment
allowed
•	Dilution of waste to comply with treatment
standards prohibited
•	Treatment can occur onsite or offsite
Control Requirements
What Are the Treatment
Requirements?
•	Reduce benzene concentration to
<10 ppmw
•	Remove or destroy benzene by 99% or
more
•	Special requirements for certain wastewater
treatment systems (WWTS)
G-7

-------
Control Requirements
What Are the Treatment
Requirements?
(continued)
• Compliance with treatment requirements of
other statutes:
-	RCRA waste combustion rules
-	RCRA land disposal restrictions
-	Benzene-specific effluent guidelines
Control Requirements
What Are the Treatment Processes?
•	Steam stripper
•	Thin-film evaporator
•	Waste incinerator
•	Other processes that meet performance
standards
•	Wastewater treatment systems (WWTS)
Control Requirements

What Is a Wastewater Treatment
System?
• ... a unit that ultimately discharges under NPDES
permit
• Manages certain wastes:

- Process wastewater
Landfill leachate
- Product tank
drawdown
Wastes mixed with
any of these
• Typically includes:

- Individual drain
systems
Equalization tanks
• Oil-water separators
Biological treatment
units
- Air flotation units

G-8

-------
Control Requirements
What are the Alternative
Standards for WWTS?
•	If wastes with 210 ppmw benzene mixed with
wastes <10 ppmw benzene in WWTS, special
provisions apply
•	All units in WWTS must be controlled until
both:
-	The wastes entering an uncontrolled unit
are <10 ppmw
-	The WWTS TAB first entering an
uncontrolled unit is <1 Mg/yr
•	TAB entering enhanced biodegradation is
excluded from the 1-Mg/yr determination
Treatment
How Is an Enhanced Biodegradation
Unit Defined?
•	A WWTS process unit that:
-	Uses a suspended growth process
•	Generates biomass
-	Uses recycled biomass
-	Periodically removes biomass
•	Examples of processes not considered
enhanced
-	Large, shallow biological impoundments
-	Attached growth processes such as
trickling filters or rotating biological
contactors
Control Requirements
What Are the General
Control Requirements?
•	Apply controls prior to and during
treatment
•	Cover or enclose waste management unit
•	Generally, convey emissions through
closed-vent system to control device
•	Control devices remove or destroy >95%
of organics
G-9

-------
Control Requirements
What Are the Affected Waste
Management Units?
-	Tanks
-	Surface impoundments
-	Oil-water separators
-	Containers
-	Individual drain systems
Control Requirements
Tanks
•	Requirements would apply to most
noncombustion treatment processes
•	Cover and vent to control device
•	Alternative controls: meeting
requirements of VOL storage NSPS
(40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb)
- Fixed-roof and internal floating
	- External floating roof	
Control Requirements
Surface Impoundments
•	Cover
•	Vent to control device
G-10

-------
Control Requirements
Containers
•	Cover
•	Submerge fill for pumpable waste
•	Enclose and vent to control device
during waste treatment
Control Requirements
Oil-Water Separators
•	Cover and vent to control device
•	Alternative controls
-	Floating roof
-	Meeting the requirements of
petroleum refinery wastewater
systems NSPS (40 CFR 60,
Subpart QQQ)
Control Requirements
Individual Drain Systems
•	Cover each opening and vent to control
device
•	Alternative controls
-	Comply with NSPS control
requirements (40 CFR 60,
Subpart QQQ) and
-	Control junction box emissions
•	Install water seals on junction box
•	Vent junction box to closed-vent
system and control device
G-ll

-------
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
Compliance
How Is Compliance Insured?
•	Initial determination of TAB
•	Certification of compliance
•	Monitoring and inspections
•	Records
•	Reports
Compliance
Initial Determination of TAB
•	Existing facilities report June 7,1990
•	Updates allowed as new information
obtained
•	New sources report at startup
•	Report to include:
• TAB for wastes with ฃ10% water
-	Identification of streams to be
controlled
-	Details on basis for benzene waste
streams not controlled
G-12

-------
Compliance
<1 Mg/yr
>10 Mg/yr
TAB
Initial Certification;
Annual and Quarterly
Reporting ,
Annual
Reporting
No Further
Reporting
Applicable
Facilities
1 Mg/yr to 10 Mg/yr
Compliance
Certification of Compliance
•	Submitted by March 7, 1992, or by date of
new source startup
•	Certifies installation of required equipment
•	Certifies completion of initial testing and
inspections
Compliance
Monitoring and Inspections
•	For both treatment and control processes:
-	Install continuous monitoring
equipment
-	Record all important process
parameters
-	Inspect monitoring data daily
•	Monthly effluent sampling for treatment
processes
•	Quarterly visual inspections of covers
•	Annual detectable emission surveys for
closed-vent systems
G-13

-------
Compliance
Recordkeeping Requirements
•	Record information documenting
compliance
-	Waste determination results
-	Treatment and control equipment
design
-	Inspection and monitoring results
•	Maintain records onsite for 2 years
Compliance
Reporting Requirements
•	Quarterly reports documenting
inspections
•	Quarterly reports documenting incidences
of upsets
•	Annual reports summarizing:
-	Incidences of detectable emissions
-	Visual inspections of tears, gaps, etc.
-	Repairs and corrective action
Outline
•	Overview
•	Applicability
•	Control requirements
•	Compliance
•	Summary
G-14

-------
Summary
•	The rule applies to owners and operators of:
-	Chemical manufacturing plants
-	Petroleum refineries
-	Coke by-product recovery plants
-	Offsite TSDF receiving waste from above
•	Treatment and control required for:
-	Facilities with >10 Mg/yr TAB
-	Waste streams within those facilities with
>10 ppmw benzene
Summary
(continued)
•	Treatment requirements
-	<10 ppmw or
-	>99 wt % benzene removal
•	Control prior to treatment and
noncombustion treatment units
-	No detectable emissions
-	> 95% total organic removal
G-15
6 U.S. GOVtRKMCNI PRINT INC OFFICE: 1991 548-187/20519

-------
Workshop - Organic Air Emissions from Waste
Management Facilities
Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information
Volume 1

-------