EFFECTIVENESS OF SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP
I/M PROGRAM
AESi..,i.
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
A subsidiary ol OfuyfUt. Manufacturing Company
-------
EFFECTIVENESS OF SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP
I/M PROGRAM
by
Alan D. Jones
Automotive Environmental Systems
7300 Bolsa Avenue
Westminster, California 92683
Contract No. 68-03-2881, Task 2
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
November 1980
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report tech-
nical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are available
free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and grantees, and
nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from the Library Services
Office (MD-35), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a fee,
from the National Technical Information Service, 585 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by Automo-
tive Environmental Systems, Westminster, California 92683, in fulfillment of
Contract No. 68-03-2881, Task 2. The contents of this report are reproduced
herein as received from Automotive Environmental Systems. The opinions,
findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the author and not neces-
sarily those of the Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of company or
product names is not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
ii
-------
ABSTRACT
This report presents and summarizes exhaust emissions test data
and other related information obtained in the testing and inspection of 55
in-use passenger cars. The test fleet consisted of 1975-1979 automobiles.
The test vehicles were obtained randomly from private owners in the Los
Angeles and Orange County areas. The testing was completed October 1980.
Each vehicle was tested in as-received condition and given an
underhood emissions control component inspection. The test sequence con-
sisted of a tailpipe test for the presence of lead, an underhood emissions
control component inspection and a four-mode idle emissions test. Vehicles
passing this initial screening were returned to the owners and those veh-
icles failing the screening remained at AESi for more extensive testing.
The vehicles remaining at AESi received a State Lane inspection, a 1975
Federal Test Procedure, a Highway Fuel Economy test, a 50 MPH Cruise test, a
Four-Speed Idle test, a Federal Loaded Two-Mode test, a State Loaded
Two-Mode test, a Four-Speed Idle test with one spark plug disconnected and
needed repairs performed by AESi and state qualified commercial repair
facilities. Three of the vehicles remaining at AESi received SHED evapora-
tive emissions testing.
iii
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Automotive Environmental Systems wishes to extend its apprecia-
tion and special thanks to Mr. Bruce Michael, Task Officer, Mr. Thomas
Tupaj, Project Officer, and Mr. John T. White, Program Manager, for provid-
ing counsel, technical guidance, and understanding throughout the program.
We also wish to recognize the assistance of the manufacturers of
the automobiles which were tested in this project.
v
-------
CONTENTS
Abstract . lii
Acknowledgements v
1. Introduction 1
2. Technical Discussion 2
2.1 Program Objectives 2
2.2 Program Design ....... 2
2.3 Test Vehicle Procurement ...... ...... 2
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection 2
2.3.2 Incentives for Participation 3
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Handling 3
2.4 Facilities and Equipment 3
2.4.1 Test Location 3
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler . . 4
2.4.3 Emission Analysis Console ... 4
2.4.4 Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED). 5
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometer 6
2.4.6 Data Acquisition System ....... 6
2.4.7 Driver's Aid 6
2.4.8 Miscellaneous Equipment ......... 6
2.5 Equipment Qualification, Calibration and Crosscheck 7
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler 7
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console 8
2.5.3 Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED). 10
2.5.4 ECE-50 Chassis Dynamometer
2.5.5 Data Acquisition System 11
2.5.6 Miscellaneous Equipment 11
2.6 Test Procedures. ...................... 11
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation 11
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation
2.6.3 Initial Screening 12
2.6.4 State Lane Inspection .......... 12
2.6.5 Cold Start Sequence ..... 13
2.6.6 Commercial Repair 15
2.6.7 Underhood EGB Check 15
2.6.8 State Loaded Two-Mode 15
2.6.9 Low Emissions Tune-Up 15
vii
-------
2.6.10 Evaporative Emissions Testing ............ 15
2.6.11 After-Test Procedures
2.6.12 Daily Test Schedule 16
2.7 Data Handling 16
2.7.1 Data Collection 16
2.7.2 Data Processing 16
2.7-3 Quality Control 17
2.7.4 Calculation of Results 17
3.0 Discussion of Test Results 19
3-1 Test Fleet Description 19
3-2 Federal Test Procedure Emissions and Fuel Economy 19
List of Figures 21
Figure 1 Vehicle Matrix 23
Figure 2 Testing Flow Chart 27
Figure 3 Q.A. Flow Chart 29
Figure 4 Underhood/EGR Inspection Form with Plumbtesmo Lead
Test Procedure 33
Exhibit A Final Listing of Test Results 35
viii
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through authority
provided by the Clean Air Act, is responsible for the control and prevention
of air pollution. As provided by the Act, one of the charges of the EPA is
the design, conduct and promotion of surveys and studies of the sources of
air pollution. The Emission Control Technology Division (ECTD) of the EPA
develops, implements and administers a national program to characterize,
quantify and reduce the air pollution caused by mobile sources. Included in
the division's responsibilities is the collection of emissions data from
in-use vehicles and the development and evaluation of alternatives for the
control of vehicle emissions. These in-use vehicle data are utilized by the
EPA in calculating and projecting motor vehicle emissions from light-duty
vehicles. The emission factors generated by this process are also used in
developing transportation control procedures and contingency programs to
cover emergency situations. Outside of the EPA, these data and the emission
control alternatives are used by various state and local agencies in their
air pollution control programs. In carrying out its responsibilities, the
EPA regularly conducts in-use vehicle emission factors programs and emission
control alternative studies. In order to support the states in their
efforts to implement their air quality programs, the Emission Control Tech-
nology Division will use the data generated by this project to assess the
effectiveness of new technology vehicle exhaust emissions systems in Los
Angeles.
This report describes a program conducted by Automotive Environ-
mental Systems, (AESi) to gather information on the effectiveness of south
coast air basin change of ownership I/M program. The testing was conducted
between August 1980 and October 1980.
Section 2 of this report describes the objectives, design, and
oonduct of the program. Section 3 presents summary results. Detailed list-
ings of data are presented in the Appendices by vehicle number. Data pack-
ets and punched computer cards, with EPA-defined data formats, were sub-
mitted to the Project Officer.
1
-------
SECTION 2
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
This report describes a program conducted by Automotive Environ-
mental Systems, (AESi) to gather information on the effectiveness of south
coast air basin change of ownership I/M program. The testing was conducted
between August 1980 and October 1980.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
The emphasis of this project was to gather information on the
effectiveness of south coast air basin change of ownership I/M program. The
effectiveness of this program may aid other areas in the implementation of
similar programs. The test fleet consisted of 1975-1979 vehicles specifi-
cally selected by the EPA to represent a cross-section of vehicles that had
possibly undergone a change of ownership since the program began.
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
A list of vehicle makes and engine families was provided by the
EPA. Specific guidelines were provided as to the quantities desired from
each of these engine families.
In an effort to avoid biasing the sample, the number of vehicles
procured from members of commercial, civic, fraternal, or religious organi-
zations was limited to fifty percent of the vehicles from any one model
year. The use of rental, leased or fleet vehicles was forbidden. Groups of
vehicles were not obtained from organizations which are automobile oriented.
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection
Test vehicles were selected based on guidelines provided by the
EPA Project Officer.
Test vehicles were solicited using various methods. The primary
method was from vehicle registration lists purchased from a market
information service company, from which mailings were prepared. Vehicles
2
-------
were also solicited using news releases in local papers and paid
advertisements in newspapers and flyers.
2.3.2 Incentives for Participation
The owner of a suitable test vehicle was provided the following
incentives for his participation:
A $100 U.S. Savings Bond. Bonds were mailed to par-
ticipants within one month following the test on
their vehicle.
The use of a late-model, fully insured loaner auto-
mobile during the time their vehicle was undergoing
testing.
The owner's automobile was returned with a full tank
of fuel.
Owner's of vehicles that passed the initial screening
were given a tank of gas only.
2.3'3 Test Vehicle Handling
In most cases, the vehicle was scheduled to be delivered to AESi
in Westminster by appointment. In some cases, vehicles were picked up
and/or delivered at a participant's home or place of business. An inspec-
tion was performed to ensure proper vehicle match and to establish the phys-
ical condition of the vehicle. The owner remained at AESi during an initial
screening of the vehicle. This screening consisted of a tailpipe test for
the presence of lead, using plumbtesmo test paper, an underhood emissions
control component inspection, an EGR test and a four-mode idle emissions
test. Vehicles passing this screening were returned to the owner with a
full tank of gasoline. Vehicles failing this screening remained at AESi for
further testing. A loan vehicle exchange agreement, the savings bond appli-
cation and the Vehicle Owner Use Questionnaire were completed at this time.
Once the vehicle was accepted into the program it then followed the sequence
illustrated in Figure 2.
2.4 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
2.4.1 Test Location
All tests were performed at AESi's test facility at 7300 Bolsa
Avenue in Westminster, California. The facility is located approximately 25
miles south of downtown Los Angeles at an elevation of 45 feet above sea
level.
The test facility environment, including testing and vehicle soak
areas, was maintained within the requirements of the contract. A permanent
3
-------
record was maintained for the ambient temperature in the soak and test areas
for all phases of testing. The vehicle soak area is inside the same build-
ing as is the test area and is free from precipitation.
2.4.2 Constant Volume Sampler
A positive displacement pump type constant volume sampler (CVS)
built by AESi was used in this program. This CVS meets or exceeds all spec-
ifications defined in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 86,
Subparts A and B (40 CFR Part 86). The system contains six sample bags
switched by computer in sample/background pairs for all dilute exhaust
sample testing.
All plumbing in the sampling, analytical and calibration systems
is either stainless steel or teflon. This includes all sample, calibration
and zero gas lines and the valves and regulators for NO gases. Leak-tight
stainless 3teel convoluted tubing is used between the CVS and the vehicle
tail pipe for exhaust gas sampling. An appropriate leak-tight boot was used
to connect the tail pipe to the convoluted tubing. A stainless steel heat
exchanger with a temperature controlled cold water inlet was used to provide
essentially a constant exhaust gas temperature throughout the entire test.
The sample and dilution air bags are made of Dupont Tedlar mater-
ial and are of a volume compatible with the CVS unit (i.e., no pressure
build up in the bag when filling with sample or background gas).
2.4.3 Emission Analysis Console
An AESi exhaust gas analytical system meeting or exceeding the
specifications of 40 CFR Part 86, was used for dilute gas measurements.
Similar laboratory type instrumentation, with additional ranges, was used
for analysis of raw NO gas. In addition, a Chrysler Model III garage-type
analyzer was used for measurement of raw HC and CO. The console contains
the following instrument types and ranges:
Analyzer Ranges
0-100, 0-500 ppn.
(11 1/4" Cell Length)
Bendix Model 8501-5C NDIR
(Lo CO - Dilute Exhaust) 0-100, 0-500 ppm
Beckman 315B NDIR
(Hi CO - Dilute Exhaust)
Beckman 315B NDIR
(COg - Dilute Exhaust)
0-.3* (2 1/2" Cell Length)
0-3%, 0-5% (1/4" Cell Length)
0-2.5%, 0-4$
(1/H" Cell Length)
4
-------
Beckman 400 FID
(Lo HC - Dilute Exhaust)
Beckman 400 FID
(Hi HC - Dilute Exhaust)
Teco 10AR Cherailuminescent
(NOx - Dilute Exhaust)
Teco 10AR Chemiluminescent
(NO - Raw Exhaust)
Chrysler Model III Garage
(HC - Raw Exhaust)
(CO - Raw Exhaust)
0-50, 0-100, 0-300 ppm Carbon
0-1,000, 0-3,000 ppm Carbon
0-100, 0-250
0-1,000, 0-2,500 ppm
0-250, 0-1,000, 0-2,500
0-4,000 ppm
0-300, 0-2,000 ppm
Hexane Equivalent
0-.5*, 0-10%
2.4.3.1 Laboratory Standard Calibration & Working Gases
Laboratory standard calibration gases, previously approved by
EPA, were used for defining instrument calibration curves and assigning con-
centration values for the working gases. Each cylinder of standard gas and
each working gas cylinder was equipped with its own pressure regulator as
specified by the contract. All gases were plumbed to a quick-disconnect
panel for ease in selecting the gas desired during calibration and testing.
Calibration gases for each range of the HC and NOx analyzers were
chosen such that three points were used across the curve (zero and approxi-
mately 45$ and 90$ of full scale concentration). CO and CO2 calibration
points were at zero and approximately 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 percent of
full scale. All span gases were 80-100 percent of full scale.
The diluents used in the calibration and working gases are:
HC, ppmC Propane in HC free air
NOx, ppm In zero grade nitrogen
CO, mole % In zero grade nitrogen
CO2, mole % In zero grade nitrogen
2.4.4 Sealed Housing For Evaporative Determinations (SHED)
Evaporative emissions tests were performed using an AESi SHED and
its associated operator console. The SHED meets all requirements of 40 CFR
Part 86. The console includes a Beckman 400 FID analyzer with ranges of
0-100, 0-300, 0-1000 and 0-3000 ppmC; a Linear Instruments chart recorder
for analyzer output; a Leeds and Northrup SPEED0MAX multipoint temperature
recorder; and a variable voltage source and heating element (blanket) for
applying heat to the vehicle gas tank for the diurnal heat build. A cooling
package is installed to ensure operation of the SHED within the temperature
range of 68°F to 86°F. The cooling package consists of a 1680 CFM fan
5
-------
and a heat exchanger utilizing cold water (68°F) to maintain the ambient
temperature within the SHED.
2.4.5 Chassis Dynamometer
The chassis dynamometer was equipped to simulate vehicle inertia
and road load horsepower as required in 40 CFR Part 86.
The dynamometer used was a Clayton ECE-50 with 17 1/4 inch roll
spacing and 8 5/8 inch diameter rolls. Direct drive variable inertia load-
ing weights were employed, with 250 pound increments from 1,750 through
3,000 pounds and 500 pound increments from 3,000 through 5,500.
A speed meter which indicates mi/hr was used to monitor the speed
of the dynamometer roll. The rear dynamometer roll is equipped with a ta-
chometer generator which provides the speed signal during testing. The
meter response was linear with speed and the accuracy was within +2.0 km/hr
(+1.2 mph) over the range of 0-95 km/hr (0-59 mph). The dynamometer was
equippped to measure actual distance traveled for each segment of the FTP
testing sequence. However, the theoretical distance for each segment was
used in the exhaust emissions calculations.
The power absorption unit was monitored by a power meter accurate
and readable to +0.25 hp (0.187 kw) over the range of intended use.
2.4.6 Data Acquisition System
Data were obtained from the analyzers, CVS and dynamometer via an
AESi Data Acquisition Control Computer (DACC).' A Data General NOVA computer
was used for generating driver traces for the various driving schedules, for
sample bag management and for calculation and presentation of the emission
test results. The data were printed by a Data General Dasher printer imme-
diately following sample analysis.
The output from the analyzers was also wired to four
Hewlett-Packard Model 7130A two-pen recorders. One recorder was used for
dilute HC and NOx, one for dilute CO and CO2, one for undiluted HC and CO
and one for undiluted NO.
2.4.7 Driver's Aid
A two-pen Hewlett-Packard Model 7130A Driver's Aid (speed vs time
recorder) was employed to permanently record the driver's performance during
the test. The driving trace was generated by the NOVA computer on this re-
corder in agreement with the specifications of 40 CFR Part 86.
2.4.8 Miscellaneous Equipment
Miscellaneous equipment used in conjunction with the major items
of equipment included the following:
6
-------
Two Teco Model 100 NOx Generators. The generator in
the raw gas analysis bench was not used since only
NO is reported.
One Rustrak Chart Recording Psychrometer, Model
2133B with continuous recording of wet/dry bulb tem-
peratures.
One Rustrak Chart Recorder, Model AD 101-462-2A for
continuous recording of CVS temperature.
One Weathermeasure M7Q1 continuous recording temper-
ature recorder for soak area temperature.
One Princo Mercurial Barometer.
One Meriam 50 MC2-4SF Laminar Flow Element for CVS
calibration.
One Sartorius Model 2257 Balance used for weighing
the propane cylinders for propane recovery tests.
One Strobotach for dynamometer speed calibration.
Horiba GSM and MEXA 300A garage analyzers were used
for vehicle inspection by the mechanic.
2.5 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, CALIBRATION AND CROSSCHECK
This section describes the qualification, calibration, and cross-
check procedures utilized by AESi and verified by EPA technical personnel to
ensure that valid test data were generated throughout the test program.
Initial qualification included complete demonstration of individual instru-
ment calibration, zero air and nitrogen purity, CVS calibration, dynamometer
calibration, and inspection of all daily, weekly and monthly logs.
2.5.1 Constant Volume Sampler
The CVS was calibrated with a laminar flow element (Meriam Model
50- MC2-6SF) using the basic procedures specified in the Federal Register.
CVS air flow, measured using the laminar flow element on the inlet side of
the mass pump (CVS blower) was controlled by throttling. Air flow rates
were measured at five incremental changes in pump differential pressure on
each side of the normal operating point. Flow rates at a total of at least
ten points were measured. The nominal air flow of the CVS is 3^5 cfm.
Auxiliary devices employed in the calibration included a mercury barometer
to measure absolute ambient pressure, a close tolerance mercury thermometer
to measure pump inlet air temperature, a U-tube water manometer to measure
pressure drop across the pump and pump inlet pressure and a close tolerance
inclined water manometer to measure pressure drop across the laminar flow
7
-------
element. Once this calibration was completed, data from these devices were
computer processed and the mid-range blower operating point was determined.
Propane recovery tests using instrument grade propane were made after the
calibration to confirm its accuracy. A copy of the calibration data was
provided to the EPA Project Officer as a part of the qualification data
package.
Calibration of the laminar flow element (LFE) is traceable to the
National Bureau of Standards, and a certified copy of the LFE calibration
curve was furnished to the Project Officer at the time of Laboratory Quali-
fication.
Daily propane recovery tests were made to confirm continued cali-
bration of the CVS system. The measured propane mass recovered by the CVS
had to be within +2.0 percent of the injected mass of up to 20 grams of
instrument grade propane as determined gravimetrically. The recovered
amount of propane was measured on the 0-300 ppmC FID range. A Rustrak chart
recorder was used to continuously record CVS temperature during these tests.
2.5.2 Emission Analysis Console
2.5.2.1 Dilute Exhaust Analysis Console
Oomplete calibrations of the mass emission analysis console
instruments were performed initially and checked each week thereafter until
testing was completed. Calibration curves for the mass emission analysis
console CO, CO2, HC and NOx instruments were established using the gases
previously identified. The CO and CO2 instruments were calibrated at
seven somewhat evenly spaced points (zero and six upscale points) across
each operating range. Calibration of the HC and NOx instruments was per-
formed at three somewhat evenly spaced points (zero and two upscale points)
across each operating range. Calibration of these instruments was estab-
lished and maintained within one percent of full scale for each range, re-
spectively, or five percent of the measured value, whichever was smaller. A
computer program provided by the EPA was used in the generation of the cali-
bration curves.
In connection with each test, the CVS sample bags were purged
with nitrogen, evacuated and leak-checked. These operations were performed
in a bag evacuate, N2 purge, evacuate and leak-check sequence by means of
a manual pu3h-button selection of solenoids located within the CVS. A leak
in the system is indicated by a non-zero flow in the flow meters on the
operator's console.
Other activities included setting zero and span points immediate-
ly prior to exhaust sample analysis and zero and span point verifications
immediately following exhaust sample analysis. Strip chart recorders were
operated continuously throughout the zero and span set-point calibration,
sample analysis and zero and span verification sequence. Verification
tolerances were maintained within +1 deflection from the set-point for the
8
-------
range in use. Converter efficiency of the NOx converter was maintained
above 90 percent. The noise level of analyzer outputs as indicated on the
strip chart was maintained within +0.5 percent of full scale for the range
used during both calibration and analysis.
2.5.2.2 Raw Exhaust Analysis Console
The NOx instrument used in the undiluted (raw) emission analysis
console is a laboratory instrument calibrated using the same gases, calibra-
tion points, tolerances and verification frequency described above in con-
nection with the NOx instrument used in the mass emission analysis console.
Efficiency of the tail pipe raw exhaust NOx laboratory instrument thermal
converter was not checked daily because NO (Nitric Oxide) was measured and
reported, not NOx (Oxides of Nitrogen).
The tail pipe HC/CO measurement instrument was operated in ac-
cordance with the manufacturer's recommendations except that this instrument
was zeroed with nitrogen and the HC and CO span-points calibrated with
appropriate gases immediately prior to each test. Each analyzer was checked
for zero and span point drift immediately following each test.
2.5.2.3 Daily Qualification Checks
Daily qualification checks included:
Leak-check of each instrument as well as the system.
Recording of zero, gain and tune, as applicable, for
each instrument.
Hang-up and leak-checks for background and sample
bags and sample line.
NOx analyzer vacuum and converter efficiency checks.
Propane recovery tests to ensure proper FID opera-
tion as well as verification of the CVS calibration.
Recording of FID fuel and air pressure.
Recording of cylinder number, concentration, deflec-
tion, cylinder pressure for each working gas.
In addition to the above daily checks, weekly calibration curve
checks were made for each range of each instrument.
Appropriate calibrations, leak-checks, etc., were also made when-
ever maintenance was performed which could change instrument or system oper-
ation.
9
-------
2.5.3 Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHED)
The volume of the SHED used was determined by physical measure-
ment. Calibration of thermocouples used in the SHED was verified by an ASTM
thermometer as was the temperature recording instrument. Calibration curves
were generated for each range of the Beckman 400 FID used in the analytical
console. These curves were verified weekly.
For initial calibration, the FID was zeroed on zero grade prepur-
ified air and calibrated at two upscale points (i.e. 45% and 90% of full
scale) on each of the ranges used. The same hydrocarbon gas standards pre-
viously described were employed for this calibration. Curve fit tolerances
and verification frequency were the same as those applied to the dilute
emission analysis console instruments.
The SHED was subjected to a background hydrocarbon check, a cali-
bration check and a retention check prior to testing the first vehicle.
The background emissions check was performed by sealing the
enclosure and allowing it to remain sealed for a period of four hours.
Initial and final hydrocarbon readings were taken. The background emission
rate was acceptable when it was less than the maximum increase of 0.4 grams
for the four hours, as defined in 40 CFR Part 86.
The SHED was calibrated by first purging with fresh air and then
sealing the enclosure. Approximately 4 grams of instrument grade propane
was injected into the enclosure after the enclosure was sealed. The mixing
fans were operating during this injection. After five minutes of mixing,
the stabilized hydrocarbon level of the enclosure was measured and the mass
calculated. The quantity of the calculated recovery was within +2% of the
injected amount.
The propane retention (leak) check was performed following the
calibration. In this check the SHED was allowed to remain sealed for a min-
imum of four hours with the mixing blowers operating. At the end of this
period the hydrocarbon level of the enclosure was measured and the mass cal-
culated. For this check, the hydrocarbon level was within +4% of the ini-
tial reading as calculated. The SHED calibration and retention tests were
performed monthly thereafter.
2.5.4 ECE-50 Chassis Dynamometer
Dynamometer speed was verified initially and bi-weekly with a
Strobotach. Road load force was determined using calibrated weights.
Coastdowns were performed initially and bi-weekly thereafter to verify the
road load force versus inertia weight relationships as given in 40 CFR Part
86.
10
-------
2.5.5
Data Acquisition System
The data acquisition system was verified by performing manual
checks of equipment performance and hand calculations from strip chart data
and comparing these with the data provided by the DACC. This activity was
verified by a Quality Assurance inspection for each test. A reasonableness
check is performed for each critical data element. Any suspect data was
verified by strip chart or calculation. Any data found to be in error was
independently recalculated wherever possible or the test was rejected.
2.5.6 Miscellaneous Equipment
All miscellaneous equipment was calibrated or verified according
to manufacturer's recommended practices. The CVS laminar flow element and
barometers were calibrated by Meriam Instruments Company.
2.6 TEST PROCEDURES
2.6.1 Vehicle Preparation
Each vehicle received a preliminary safety inspection as part of
the procurement activity. This was done to ensure that the vehicle was safe
to operate on the street. Upon acceptance for testing, the vehicle's fuel
tank was drained and refueled with appropriate test fuel to 40% of tank
capacity. Vehicles receiving a SHED test were further prepared by locating
a point on the side of the fuel tank that approximated the midpoint of the
4oj fuel volume. A Type J thermocouple was then soldered to the tank at
that point. To ensure that test fuel had purged the fuel system, the veh-
icle was driven for ten minutes on city streets or on the dynamometer for
the first 505 seconds of the FTP. After the preconditioning run, the veh-
icle was driven or pushed into the soak area for the required 12 to 24 hour
soak at temperatures between 68°F and 86°F. Drive wheel tire pressure
was set to 45 psi prior to dynamometer testing to prevent tire damage.
Figure 2 presents a flow chart of testing activities.
2.6.1.1 Driveability Evaluation
An evaluation of the driveability of each vehicle was performed
prior to and during each FTP. The evaluation is essentially the same as
that performed on previous EPA light duty vehicle projects.
2.6.2 Equipment Preparation
Prior to the first test of the day and following any shut-down,
equipment which had been idle or in a stand-by condition was activated to
begin warm-up. This included the CVS water heater, mass pump and each of
the analytical instruments. Following the warm-up of the respective instru-
ments, efficiency of the NOx instrument thermal converter wa3 checked and
11
-------
the propane recovery test involving the CVS sample system and the FID hydro-
carbon instrument was conducted. Subsequent to these checks, analyzer out-
puts, as indicated by the strip chart recorders and the DACC computer and
printer, were checked for correlation by calibrating at zero and five
volts. Prior to the first exhaust emissions test of the day or following
any extended shut-down, the dynamometer was warmed-up. The prescribed 15
minutes of 30 mile per hour operation of the dynamometer was the warm-up
procedure followed. Following warm-up, the speed calibration of the dyna-
mometer, driver's aid recorder and associated indicating devices were also
checked and calibrated as necessary.
Prior to each test, all charts were properly stamped to show,
among other things, the vehicle number, run number, date and persons involv-
ed in the test.
2.6.3 Initial Screening
This written procedure should be used in conjunction with the
Test Flow Chart presented in Figure 2.
All vehicles were screened upon arrival at AESi for "obvious
pass" classification. The screening consisted of a tailpipe test for the
presence of lead, using plumbtesmo test paper, an underhood component
inspection and a 4-rnode idle emissions test. The plumbtesmo lead test pro-
cedure is presented in Figure 4. The plumbtesmo test paper was attached to
the underhood/EGR inspection form and submitted with the other test data to
the EPA Project Officer.
The underhood component inspection was originally planned to du-
plicate the inspection performed at the State Inspection Lanes. The under-
hood/EGR inspection procedure was developed by AESi based on California Air
Resources Board and the Bureau of Automotive Repair supplied requirements.
An underhood/EGR inspection form is presented in Figure 4 with the EGR test
procedure. It was later determined that the AESi underhood check was a far
more intense inspection than the inspection being performed at the State
Lanes. As a result several vehicles were failing the initial screening at
AESi, passing the State Lane inspection and being tested further as
"incorrect pass" vehicles. Consequently, EPA decided that all vehicles
tested after September 19, 1980 would receive the initial screening tests
(plumbtesmo lead test, underhood/EGR check and 4-mode idle emissions test)
but pa3s/fail would be determined by the emissions test only. This elimi-
nated any possibilities of incorrect pass vehicles.
2.6.4 State Lane Inspection
The State Lane inspection station testing consisted of a very
quick underhood inspection and a State Loaded 2-Mode emissions test. The
State Loaded 2-Mode test included 40 MPH Cruise (at specified loads*) and
idle in neutral. The cost of the test was $11 and a retest, should the veh-
icle fail, was $7.
12
-------
2.6.5 Cold Start Sequence
The Cold Start testing sequence included a 1975 Federal Test Pro-
cedure (FTP) cold start test, a 50 MPH Cruise test, a Highway Fuel Ecnomy
test (HFET), a Four-Speed Idle test, a Federal Loaded 2-Mode test, a State
Loaded 2-Mode test (at specified loads*) and a Four-Speed Idle test with one
spark plug wire disconnected. This test sequence was performed following a
State Lane test or following any AESi repair work on the vehicle.
2.6.5.1 Federal Exhaust Emission Test Procedure
The Federal Test Procedure as described in 40 CFR Part 86 was
performed on all vehicles in the as-received condition. The evaporative
emissions portion of the procedure was performed on 3 vehicles in this pro-
gram. The exhaust emission portion of the Federal Test Procedure is com-
prised of cold transient, cold stabilized and hot transient phases. The
cold transient portion is 505 seconds long, covering a distance of 3.59
miles with an average speed of 25.6 mph. The cold stabilized portion is 869
seconds in length, 3.91 miles in distance and a 16.2 mph average speed. The
hot transient portion is identical to the cold transient portion except that
it is preceded by a 10 minute soak. The evaporative emissions testing con-
sisted of a diurnal heat build as described in 40 CFR Part 86 paragraph
86.133-78. This was followed by FTP testing and a Hot Soak test per 40 CFR
paragraph 86.138-78.
The cold soak period used for the test vehicles was 12 to 24
hours. The starting procedures and shift points used for the test vehicles
were as recommended by each manufacturer.
2.6.5.2 50 MPH Cruise
This test takes advantage of the 3 minute preconditioning run
before the HFET. Tailpipe emissions are recorded and measured continuously
throughout the period although the official sampling period ends 30 seconds
after the speed and load have stabilized at 50 MPH.
*N0TE: 10.0 AHP +1.0
15.0 AHP~+1.0
17.5 AHP +1.5
20.0 AHP +1.5
2.6.5«3 Highway Fuel Economy Test
4 Cylinders or less
5 or 6 Cylinders
8 Cylinders less than 3250 lbs
8 Cylinders more than 3250 lbs
Starting with each vehicle in a warmed-up condition (at least 7.5
miles of cyclic operation within the last thirty-five minutes) each vehicle
was operated on the chassis dynamometer at 50 miles per hour for three min-
utes. Within one minute after the end of the 50 mile per hour cruise per-
iod, the vehicle commenced operation over the 10.242 mile, 765 second driv-
ing schedule. A CVS sample bag was U3ed to gather the dilute exhaust for
emissions analysis and fuel economy calculations. HC, CO, CO2 and NOx
13
-------
emissions were measured and reported in grams per mile. Fuel economy was
calculated by the carbon balance method and reported in miles per gallon.
2.6.5.4 Four-Speed Idle Test
This test followed the HFET and required additional analytical
instruments, aside from those required for the basic FTP test, to measure
undiluted exhaust emissions. The instruments used for measurement of undi-
luted HC, CO and NO emissions are specified in Section 2.4.3.
This short test consisted of volumetric sampling of undiluted
exhaust emissions during four steady state operating conditions, with the
hood open and the cooling fan on. The first operating mode was basic idle
with the transmission in neutral. The second operating mode was at 2500
engine RPM, also in neutral. The third mode was again normal curb idle in
neutral and the fourth mode (automatic transmission vehicles only) was curb
idle in Drive with brakes applied.
Four-Speed Idle tests were preceded by a six minute idle soak
period with transmission in neutral, the hood open and the auxiliary cooling
fan on. At the end of the soak period the vehicle was operated at idle in
neutral, then at 2500 RPM, again at idle in neutral and then idle in Drive
for automatic transmission vehicles. Equilibrium of engine speed and the
CO, HC and NO analyzer output meters was maintained for 30 seconds before
the readings were recorded. CO, HC and NO were measured and reported in
percent CO, ppra Hexane and ppm NO respectively. Engine RPM from the last
idle mode was written on the vehicle data packet.
2.6.5.5 Federal Loaded Two Mode Test
The six minute soak period and the undiluted exhaust analysis
instruments described under the Four-Speed Idle test were also used for this
test. This test followed the HFET and Four-Speed Idle Test so the engine,
dynamometer and analyzers were at normal operating temperature. Inertia
weight was set at 1750 pounds. The dynamometer load was set to 9.0 actual
horsepower at 30 miles per hour regardless of vehicle weight. Using Drive
for automatic and third gear for manual transmissions, the vehicle was oper-
ated at 30 miles per hour roll speed. The concentrations of HC, CO and NO
emissions were recorded continuously during this time and analyzed after a
maximum of 30 seconds or when stabilized. Following this, the vehicle was
allowed to idle until emissions once again stabilized or for a maximum of 30
seconds before the concentrations were again analyzed.
2.6.5.6 State Loaded Two-Mode
This test is based on the Loaded Two-Mode test performed at the
State Lane inspection stations. The test consists of a 40 MPH cruise as
defined in paragraph 2.6.4 State Lane Inspection and an idle in neutral.
Undiluted HC, CO and NO emissions were recorded at each stage of the test.
14
-------
2.6.5.7 Four-Speed Idle with One Spark Plug Disconnected
This te3t is the same as the Four-Speed Idle test in Section
2.6.6 except that one spark plug wire is disconnected during the test.
2.6.6 Commercial Repair
Those vehicles needing repairs were taken to commercial repair
facilities chosen at random from a listing of State qualified facilities.
The listing was obtained from the State Lane when a vehicle failed and addi-
tional listings were obtained from the State Bureau of Automotive Repair.
AESi employees took the vehicles to the State Lane and commercial repair
facilities as the owner's of the vehicles. No one facility was used to re-
pair more than two vehicles.
2.6.7 Underhood EGR Check
The underhood/EGR check in Step "F" of the Test Flow Chart in
Figure 2 is the same test performed in the initial screening except that no
plumbtesmo lead test was performed.
2.6.8 State Loaded Two-Mode
The State Loaded 2-Mode test that occurs after AESi repair and
before a cold start sequence is an AESi performed State Loaded 2-Mode test
as defined in paragraph 2.6.4 State "Lane.
2.6.9 Low Emissions Tune Up
The Low Emissions Tune Up, appearing on the flow chart, consisted
of adjustments to IRPM, IHC, ICO, dwell and timing only. No other adjust-
ments, changes or modifications were performed at this step.
2.6.10 Evaporative Emissions Testing
Three vehicles, with failures in the evaporative emissions system
portion of the underhood check, received SHED testing. The SHED evaporative
emissions testing was performed in accordance with Federal Register test
procedures and EPA requirements. The vehicles receiving SHED tests had
evaporative emissions tests as part of the cold start sequences in test num-
bers 3 and 6 only. All other cold start test sequences were FTP without
SHED tests.
2.6.11 After-Test Procedures
After the completion of testing and acceptance of the data by
Quality Assurance, each vehicle was taken to the inspection and maintenance
area. Here the mechanic measured and recorded engine parameters which
included initial timing, idle speed, undiluted idle CO and undiluted idle HC
emissions. When possible the procedures outlined in the owner's manual and
15
-------
on the vehicle's emission sticker were followed in performing these inspec-
tions. If the owner's manual and emissions sticker were missing, the shop
manual, or other available publication was used to determine vehicle speci-
fications. In some cases, the vehicle manufacturer was called upon to aid
in determining specifications.
2.6.11.1 Maladjustment and Disablement Inspection
Following test #3 or test #7 of the flow chart in Figure 2, all
vehicles were given an extensive underhood inspection to determine the con-
dition and proper installation of each emission control component. Proce-
dures used were those detailed in manufacturers shop manuals. These proce-
dures were supplemented by other manufacturer supplied information where
necessary. The results of the many subsystem inspections were submitted to
EPA but are not listed in this report.
2.6.11.2 Fuel Tank
Prior to returning the vehicle to the owner, tire pressure was
set to manufacturer's specifications, and the fuel tank was filled to full
capacity with fuel currently being marketed in the test area. This fuel was
suitable for use in the particular vehicle.
2.6.12 Daily Teat Schedule
Test shifts were generally limited to the first and second shifts
of the day. Vehicles scheduled for test the next day were usually precondi-
tioned on the second shift. Daily calibration checks and system preparation
(as described in Section 2.5) were performed prior to the first test of the
day and tests were scheduled with this in mind.
2.7 DATA HANDLING
2.7.1 Data Collection
Various forms were developed for the recording of significant
test information. These data forms are supported by various strip charts
and computer printouts from the AESi DACC. The forms were designed to en-
able direct keypunching in the formats defined by EPA.
The information included a thorough description of each test veh-
icle, its test results and inspection parameters, its driveability charac-
teristics and its use charateristics.
2.7.2 Data Processing
Diluted exhaust emissions test results include ambient tempera-
ture, barometric pressure, humidity, and mass equivalent (grams per mile) of
total HC, CO, CO2, and of NOx both as-measured and corrected for relative
humidity. Undiluted exhaust emissions were recorded as ppm Hexane for
16
-------
hydrocarbons, percent CO for carbon monoxide and ppm NO for nitric oxides.
Fuel consumption, in miles per gallon, was calculated from bag data accord-
ing to the carbon balance technique and reported for each vehicle. The car-
bon balance technique used was provided by the Project Officer.
All of the exhaust emissions data were calculated at the time of
test by the AESi DACC. This computer was checked at least monthly using
independent calculations from the analyzer strip charts to ensure its valid-
ity.
These results were reported on a weekly and a cumulative monthly
basis using the keypunched cards prepared for submittal to EPA.
2.7.3 Quality Control
The quality assurance program applied to this project monitored
every aspect of each emissions te3t. This included operator and driver per-
formance, the sampling system, ambient test conditions, analyzer perfor-
mance, gases, fuel, dynamometer settings and all data processing. In addi-
tion, all other data submitted as part of this project received the inspec-
tion of the Quality Assurance section. Any discrepancies noted during the
review process were resolved in an appropriate manner.
Figure 3 presents a flow chart of the Quality Assurance activi-
ties.
2.7.4 Calculation of Results
2.7.4.1 Federal Test Procedure
Test results were calculated based on the procedure presented in
40 CFR Part 86. Theoretical distance was used in the grams per mile calcu-
lation for each test phase. Fuel consumption was calculated using the car-
bon balance method and was reported in miles per gallon.
2.7.4.2 50 MPH Cruise
Emissions from the 50 MPH Cruise tests, performed with the veh-
icle on the dynamometer, consisted of a five second analyze time after
stabilization of HC, CO and NO had occurred. The DACC collects ten readings
per second, averages them and prints the average value for each pollutant.
2.7.4.3 Highway Fuel Economy Test
HC, CO, COg and NOx were measured and reported in grams per
mile. The mass emissions were calculated according to 40 CFR Part 600.
Fuel economy was calculated by the carbon balance method and reported in
miles per gallon.
17
-------
2.7.4.4 Four-Speed Idle Emissions Test
Emissions from the Four-Speed Idle tests, performed with the veh-
icle on the dynamometer, consisted of a five second analyze time after
stabilization of HC, CO and NO had occurred. The DACC collects ten readings
per second, averages them and prints the average value for each pollutant.
This procedure was followed for each test mode.
2.7.4.5 Federal Loaded Two Mode Emissions Test
Federal Loaded Two Mode emissions tests were performed with the
vehicle on the dynamometer using the same computer procedure described for
the Four-Speed Idle test.
2.7.4.6 State Loaded Two-Mode
State Loaded Two-Mode emissions tests were performed with the
vehicle on the dynamometer using the same computer procedure described for
the Four-Speed Idle test.
2.7*4.7 Four-Speed Idle Test with One Spark Plug Wire Disconnected
The Four-Speed Idle tests with one spark plug wire disconnected
were performed with the vehicle on the dynamometer using the same procedure
described for the Four-Speed Idle test except one spark plug wire was dis-
connected at the spark "plug.
18
-------
SECTION 3
DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
3.1 TEST FLEET DESCRIPTION
The test fleet was made up of a total of 55 vehicles. The final
vehicle matrix by make and model year is shown in Figure 1.
The vehicle numbering system groups all model year vehicles by
the leading digit of the vehicle (e.g. 5022 would be a 1975 vehicle, 9007
would be a 1979 vehicle).
3.2 TEST RESULTS
Test results are presented by vehicle number in Table 1. The
results are presented in the order in which the tests were performed and
with the appropriate comments for each phase of testing.
19
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Vehicle Matrix
Figure 2 Testing Flow Chart
Figure 3 Q.A. Flow Chart
Figure 4 Underhood/EGR Inspection Form with Plumbtesmo Lead Test Procedure
21
-------
VEHICLE LIST
1975 MODEL YEAR
Model
AMC
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Dodge/Plymouth
Ford
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Toyota
Datsun
Honda
VW
Description
C258A1
M350A4
L425A4
S140M2
C250A1
M350A2
M350A2
L400A4
C225A1
M318A2
S140M2
C250A1
C302A2
M351A2
M350A4
M350A2
S097M2
S085M2
S091M3
S097M2
Figure 1
23
-------
1977 MODEL YEAR
Model
AMC
Buick
M350A4
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Dodge/Plymouth
Ford
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Toyota
Datsun
Honda
VW
VEHICLE LIST
1976 MODEL YEAR
Description Model Description
S232M1 AMC C258A1
C231A2 Buick M350A4
L425A4 Cadillac L425A4
S098M1 Chevrolet S140M2
M250A1 C250A1
M350A4 C305A2
M350A2
L400A4
C225A1 Dodge/Plymouth C225A1
M318A2 M318A2
S140M2 Ford S140M2
S171A2 C250A1
C302A2 C302A2
M351A2 M351A2
M350A4 Oldsmobile M350A4
M350A4 Pontiac M350A2
S097M2 Toyota S097M2
S134M2
S085M2 Datsun S085M2
S091M3 Honda S091M3
S097M0 VW S097M2
Figure 1 (Continued)
24
-------
1979 MODEL YEAH
Model
AMC
Buick
Chevrolet
Dodge/Plymouth
Ford
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Toyota
Dataun
Honda
VW
Description
C25&A1
S231A2
M350A2
S098M2
S151A2
S250A1
S305A2
S105M2
M225A2
S098M2
C250A1
M351A2
L260A2
S151M2
M301A2
S097M2
S134A2
S085M2
S076M2
S097MO
VEHICLE LIST
1978 MODEL YEAR
Model
AMC
Buick
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Dodge/Plymouth
Ford
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Toyota
Datsun
Honda
W
Description
C232A1
S231A2
M350A4
L425A4
S098M1
C250M1
S305A2
C105M2
C225A2
S098M2
S140M2
C250A1
M3Q2A2
L351A2
L350A4
S151A2
S071M2
S085M2
S091M3
S089MO
Figure 1 (Continued)
2S
-------
EFFECTIVENESS OF SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN CHANGE-OF-OWNERSHIP
I/M PROGRAM
TEST FLOW CHART
CC-3) ( COLD START
TEST 6
(C-S) (COLD START
TEST 8
i FINISH ) I FINISH )
Figure 2
27
-------
START
Lab crew performs
appropriate test
sequence
Laboratory test
crew finished
with vehicle
test E
Packet should contain:
Drivers Trace, Strip Charts,
Computer Sheet, Temp Traces,
Evap fuel temp chart, evap data
sheets (if applicable), drivea-
bility form, fuel tank cap,
starting § shifting procedures
and station chart.
Packet should have all proper
Document at. i on f i 1 W in.
Figure 3 - QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITY
29
-------
Figure 3 - QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITY (CONTINUED)
30
-------
o
Figure 3 - QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITY (CONTINUED)
31
-------
o
Figure 3 - QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITY (CONTINUED)
32
-------
4 ESi..,il
ircmamn nwMw«Mni juiin, mc
2 3* 6 7
il LJ Lil lalJ LJ IiluJ
TEST
NQ.
SOUTH COAST I/M
PHclIMXNARV TEST SUMMARY
VEh NO.
EhIClE NUMBER:
AkE/moqsl:
In:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE:
N.O£RnOu3 IhSPECTIOn
CrtANXCASE OEviCc (Circle Response)
1. Qevice is ARB certifies or OEM:
2. rale vacuum Test: Type*
3¦ vacuum
Certified
1
\
Yes
2
OEM
2
2
NO
3
Other
3 A
Col. Numoers
(13)
CIA)
(15)
cXHAUST
CONTROL OEVICE (Circle Cooe)
V.
Heat Riser
2.
Air Pump
3.
Puap Bell
4.
Tner«astatic Air Cleaner
s.
Emission Laoel
4.
Dual Oiapnra* oisttioucor
7.
Oistrioutor Retaro Solenoid
a.
Vacuum Delay Valve
9.
vacuua Advance Valve
10.
Transmission Controlled ijjar*
11.
Speeo Controlled Spar*
12.
tCR Valve
1J.
Cataiytic Converter
evaporative control oevice
Filler Cap
Moses and Connections
i' Canister
1 3 4 5
1 3 A 5
1 3 4 5
1 3 4 5
1 2 3
12 3
12 3
12 3
12 3
12 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
12 3
*T»pe l
rJpe 2
, hio»owoases to the intake manifold.
Open Systea uses a valve "control bio oycrankcase vacuum to route excess bio*
« Restrictea Systea uses a valve conit»i«» "7
T>0< 3 "orto^irno^lIS^s usej. Excess olo- «>» ««•• P"s tr,rou«n " tufie t0 the ait
. cleaner »nare they are ora-n into tn* "IE®""*
,Be 4 cioseo Syste* Co*oinaUan of Type a and Type c.
H
, sot Requirea r»rh- Pass Fail
» Requireo, Present
Requiteo, Not Present
« Requireo, Present, Operaole
3 a —- a...«nr NQA-OQ•F
Oy
ncquirnu, ^ I
Required, Present, Non-Operaole
Figure 4
33
-------
AESi.,1
Auromomt smtm. me
SOUTH COAST I/M
PRELIMINARY TEST SUMMARY
VEHICLE NUMBER
LEAD TEST:
Attach Plumbtesmo
Test
EGR CHECK 1 1 L-4 General Motors (use 2500 RPM)
~ Other (use 2000 RPM)
~ Vacuum hose not flexible enough to clamp, test aborted
~ Test aborted due to fragile-looking vacuum hose
~ Vacuum hose disconnected, test aborted
~ Vacuum hose damaged during test attempt
~ EGR Vacuum lines inaccessible
Change in RPM w/clamp released (100 RPM min)
Tech: Pass Fail
EMISSION CHECK:
4 Speed Idle, Second
Neutral
HC
Pass/Fail Criteria
Tech:
09/04/80/0199A
CO
NO
100 .5%
Pass Fail
Figure 4
34
-------
EXHIBIT A
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
35
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL
NO no YEAR MAKE
CID
TEST
TYPE
1 6001 1976 FGRD 351 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
Df1MENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC» PPM CO"/. NO, PPM
12.
89.
406.
1.
13.
170.
3.
6.
0. 03
0. 95
6. 39
0. 04
0. 01
1. 96
0. 03
0. 00
260. 30 MPH
44. IDLE-N
29.
133.
46.
55.
752.
36.
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST EMISSION RESULTS
TYPE HC, PPM CO*/. NO/ PPM
1 6002 1976 MERC 302 LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: FAIL CO.
0. 11
313.
32.
1. 71
26.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
560.
9. 62
32.
idle-n
22.
0. 08
166.
2500 R
27.
1. 86
29.
idle-n
260.
5. 61
24.
idle-d
STATE MOD
55.
0. 15
804.
40 MPH
8.
2. 10
20.
idle-n
HC,PPM CO"/. NO/ PPM
2 6002 1976 MERC 302 STATE MOD 95. 0.37 674. 40 MPH
147. 4. 30 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAIL HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
test veh model test emission results
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 N0XC MPG
3 6002 1976 MERC 302 1975 FTP 3.12 41.21 643.28 1.70 12.36
HWY FET 0.86 3.80 431.60 2.41 19.09
HC,PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
22.
0. 07
242.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
39.
0. 05
162.
30 MPH
10.
0. 18
16.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
255.
4. 99
20.
IDLE-N
25.
0. 05
74.
2500 RPM
10.
0. 08
21.
IDLE-N
76.
1. 83
14.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
56.
0. 09
387.
40 MPH
20.
0. 71
10.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1633.
4. 02
17.
IDLE-N
503.
0. 05
82.
2500 RPM
173.
0. 54
16.
IDLE-N
364.
1. 56
21.
IDLE-D
HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
4 6002 1976 MERC 302 STATE MOD 107. 0.25 803. 40 MPH
^ENTS: PASS.
43. 0. 14 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING CF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
5 6002 1976 MERC 302 1975 FTP 1.77 9.61 622.09 1.85 13.81
HWY FET 0. 34 2. 58 457. 60 2. 33 19. 1
HC,PPM
CO 7.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
21.
0. 04
233.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
32.
0. 04
149.
30 MPH
7.
0. 03
20.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
107.
1. 60
25.
idle-n
6.
0. 03
59.
2500 Rpi
IS.
0. 04
20.
IDLE-N
28.
0. 04
25.
IDLE—D
STATE MOD
35.
0. 05
313.
40 MPH
6.
0. 03
28.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1025.
1. 30
21.
idle-n
435.
0. 06
67.
2500 Rpi
325.
0. 05
18.
IDLE-N
296.
0. 08
20.
idle-d
COMMENTS:
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC,PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
1 5003 1975 MERC 302 LOD 2M0D 10. 0.03 313. 30 MPH
10. 0.02 56. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL 15. 0.02 36. IDLE-N
2. 0. 03 140. 2500 RPM
33. 0.02 61. IDLE-N
21. 0.02 141. IDLE-D
STATE MOD 20. 0. 04 487. 40 MPH
12. 0. 02 65. IDLE-N
^OMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS/INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO
YEAR
MAKE
CID TYPE
HC, PPM
C 07.
NO,PPM
1 8004
1973
FORD
140 LOD 2M0D
13.
o
o
PJ
490.
30 MPH
3.
0. 01
44.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
3.
0. 02
33.
idle-n
3.
0. 01
70.
2500 Rf
1.
0. 01
36.
idle-n
2.
0. 02
34.
idle-d
STATE MOD
12.
0. 02
847.
40 MPH
3.
0. 02
47.
idle-n
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LDS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST v'EH
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST EMISSION RESULTS
TYPE HC, PPM CO7. NO, PPM
1
6005
1976
PLYM
!5 LOD 2M0D
QflMENTS: FAIL UNDER HOOD.
11.
0. 02
153. 30 MPH
5.
0. 01
36.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
1 1.
0. 07
45.
IDLE-N
28.
0. 03
46.
2500 RPM
4.
0. 01
36.
IDLE-N
5.
0. 01
68.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
8.
0. 09
38.
40 MPH
2.
0. 01
40.
IDLE-N
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
2 6005 1976 PLYM 225 STATE MOD 84. 4.23 77. 40 MPH
79. 0. 08 0. IDLE-N
OMMENTS: INCORRECT PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING! PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING uF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTPj HFET IN 5MS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
NO
7
EMISSION RESULTS
HC CO CQ2 NOXC MPv
6005
1
PLYM 225 1975 FTP 1.22 37.33 550.34 1.00 14.45
HWY FET 0. 32 26. 33 525. 90 0. 51 15. c
50 CRUIS
LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
:OMMENTS:
FUEL t
CHOKE
STATE MOD
4SPD DIS
SHED-GMS
:AK AT FUEL FILTER INLET AND
104 LEAN.. MECHANICAL VALVES
HC, PPM
CO 7.
NO,PPM
5.
0. 05
41.
50 HPH
12.
0. 02
158.
30 MPH
16.
0. 01
37.
idle-n
32.
0. 01
35.
idle-n
35.
0. 02
47.
2500 Rp
17.
0. 01
32.
IDLE~n
1 1.
0. 01
59.
IDLE-d
13.
0. 10
41.
40 MPH
9.
0. 01
39.
IDLE-N
336.
0. 02
47.
idle-n
365.
0. 03
61.
2500 Rp
151.
0. 03
48.
IDLE-N
169.
0. 03
96.
IDLE-d
18. 02
diurnal
nn 7 n
si. Cm • / eu
HOT SOA
40. 74
TOTAL
OUTLET
HOSE.
NOISY.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP, HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
9 6005 1976 PLYM 225 1975 FTP 1.59 47.65 554.16 0.83 14.00
HWY FET 0.36 36.19 537.70 0.45 14.39
HC/ PPM
cov.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
4.
0. 42
30.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
13.
0. 05
103.
30 MPH
0.
0. 01
32.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
2.
0. 01
32.
IDLE-N
12.
0. 02
37.
2500 RPM
1.
0. 01
27.
IDLE-N
3.
0. 01
43.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
17.
0. 36
34.
40 MPH
1.
0. 01
36.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
601.
0. 08
39.
IDLE-N
672.
0. 10
45.
2500 RPM
219.
0. 01
40.
IDLE-N
220.
0. 01
70.
IDLE-D
SHED-GMS
0. 67
DIURNAL
1. 96
HOT SOAK
2. 63
TOTAL
-OMMENTS: INLINE FUEL FLTR HOSES REPAIRED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
"EST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 7006 1977
— EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM CO"/. NO, PPM
FORD 351 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
15.
4
82
27
23
105
13
28
0. 02
0. 01
2. 01
0. 04
0. 02
2. 31
0. 01
0. 02
243.
20
26
151
19
26
870
24
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RF
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
OMMENTS: FAIL EGR.
HC, PPM CO7. NO, PPM
2 7006 1977 FORD 351 STATE MOD 22. 0.04 1375. 40 MPH
10. 0.03 0. IDLE-N
OMMENTS: INCORRECT PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TE5TING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
7
7006
1977
FORD 351
1975 FTP 0. 62
HWY FET 0. 14
5. 10 758. 85 3. 14 11. 54
0. 13 499. 80 5. 55 17. 72
50 CRUIS
LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
4SPD DIS
Comments: limiter cap mis,choke obi rich,vac
, PPM
CO'/.
NO, PPM
4.
0. 01
681.
50 MPH
5.
0. 00
193.
30 MPH
1.
0. 00
18.
IDLE-N
37.
1. 48
24.
IDLE-N
1.
0. 00
153.
2500 RPM
0.
0. 00
17.
IDLE-N
73.
1. 58
27.
IDLE-D
11.
0. 01
790.
40 MPH
1.
0. 01
14.
IDLE-N
475.
0. 77
20.
IDLE-N
53.
0. 00
30.
2500 RPM
6.
0. 00
16.
IDLE-N
335.
0. 74
23.
IDLE-D
LINE
EGR VALVE
PLUGGED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONNENTAL SYSTEMS.. INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 6S-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
Lib
NO
TESTED THIS MONTH
vEH
NO
/ Ul'O
MODEL
YEAR
FTP;HFET IN GMS/MI
1 5"
/
MAKE CID
FORD 351
TEST
TYPE
1975
HWY
FTP
FET
HC
1. S3
0. 12
EMISSION RESULTS -
CO C02 NOXC
1 o. 5o
0. 57
785. 60
506.40
0. 99
1. 60
MPG
10. 86
17. 4
HC, PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
1.
0. 01
170.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
5.
0. 01
66.
30 MPH
5.
0. 01
19.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
66.
1. 62
24.
idle-n
S.
0. 00
59.
2500 RP
0.
0. 00
19.
IDLE-N
36.
1. 96
24.
idle-d
STATE MOD
10.
0. 01
247.
40 MPH
3.
0. 01
19.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
269.
1. 10
23.
idle-n
6.
0. 02
19.
2500 Rpl
3.
0. 01
15.
IDLE-N
299.
0. 84
28.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: EGR VACUUM HOSE REPAIRED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS/INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 9007 197? FORD 98 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
ri^MENTS: FAIL HC AND CO.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM coy. NO, PPM
11.
75.
181.
89.
88.
0. 01
1. 65
2. 91
2. 09
3. 05
0. 00
377.
17
25
35
25
0
670
39
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
2 9007 1979 FORD 98 STATE MOD 104. 0.00 1427. 40 MPH
156. 1.41 0. IDLE-N
OMMENTS: FAIL HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
3 9007 1979 FORD 98 1975 FTP 0.25 2.71 353.40 1.66 24.76
HWY FET 0. 05 0. 12 229. 40 2. 39 38. 6
HC,PPM
CD'/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
5.
0.
00
396.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
35.
0.
01
463.
30 MPH
31.
0.
32
11.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
218.
3.
32
21.
IDLE-N
54.
1.
58
24.
2500 Rp
213.
2.
94
21.
idle~n
0.
0.
00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
22.
0.
00
584.
40 MPh
51.
1.
03
15.
IDLEhm
4SPD DIS
605.
1.
64
16.
idle-n
16.
0.
01
47.
2500 Rp
65.
0.
17
8.
idle-n
0.
0.
00
0.
idle-d
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP OK,IRPM +225.
4 9007 1979 FORD 98 STATE MOD
COMMENTS: PASS.
HC, PPM coy.
18. 0. 02
37. 0. 02
NO, PPM
213. 40 MPH
0. IDLE—N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED
TEST VEH
NO NO
5 9007
MONTH
FTP.. HFET IN GMS/MI
MODEL
YEAR
197?
MAKE CID
FORD 98
TEST
TYPE
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
EMISSION RESULTS -
CO C02 NOXC
0. 23 0. 99
0. 06 0. 00
337. 59
227. 60
MPG
1. 64 26. 12
2. 46 38. 94
JMMENTS: LI MITER CAP
HC, PPM
cov.
NO. PPM
50 CRUIS
7.
0. 01
376.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
10.
0. 01
352.
30 MPH
3.
0. 01
21.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
7.
0. 01
16.
IDLE-N
5.
0. 01
19.
2500 RPM
6.
0. 01
12.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
11.
0. 01
495.
40 MPH
0.
0. 01
20.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
31.
0. 01
22.
IDLE-N
58.
0. 01
122.
2500 RPM
12.
0. 01
28.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
UNDERHOOD AND EGR
INSPECTION
OK.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 6S-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
1 8008
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1978 CHEV 98 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
EMISSION RESULTS
HC/ PPM coy. NOi PPM
7.
22.
13.
14.
15.
16.
5.
0. 07
0. 01
0. 03
0. 07
0. 02
0. 02
0. 04
0. 01
136.
29
24
47
31
29
144
30
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
30 MPH
idle-n
idle-n
2500 RP
IDLE-N
idle-d
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
7009
MODEL
YEAR MAKE
1977
PLYM
TEST
CID TYPE
225 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
EMISSION RESULTS
HC,PPM CO"/. NO, PPM
OMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
0.
1.
5.
0.
1.
4.
0.
0.
0. 01
0. 12
0. 85
0. 05
0. 13
0. 11
0. 01
0. 03
130. 30 MPH
12. IDLE-N
15.
40.
14.
20.
145.
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS-INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST EMISSION RESULTS
TYPE HC, PPM CO"/. NO- PPM
1 9010 1979 VOLK 89 LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: FAIL EGR.
9.
0. 01 1001. 30 MPH
3.
0. 01
42.
Idle-n
4SPD IDL
24.
0. 33
34.
IDLE-N
IS.
0. 02
19.
2500 Rf
27.
0. 47
34.
idle-n
39.
0. 34
46.
idle-d
STATE MOD
9.
0. 01
1128.
40 MPH
2.
0. 01
42.
IDLE-N
HC< PPM CO"/. NO; PPM
9010 1979 VOLK 89 STATE MOD 33. 0.04 2039. 40 MPh
COMMENTS: FAIL CO.
n. 2. 19 0. IDLE-n
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
test veh
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
9010
1 979
VOLK
89
1975 FTP
HWY FET
0. 68
0. 21
4. 65
0. 92
356. 08
264.70
3. 59
4. 77
24. 28
33. 23
OMMENTS:
HC, PPM
CO'/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
11.
0. 01
1136.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
17.
0. 03
1142.
30 MPH
36.
0. 43
44.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
29.
0. 56
33.
IDLE-N
39.
0. 18
63.
2500 RPM
31.
0. 52
36.
IDLE-N
51.
0. 53
49.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
1 1.
0. 02
1072.
40 MPH
26.
0. 42
37.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
908.
0. 03
36.
IDLE-N
334.
0. 01
162.
2500 RPM
334.
0. 05
31.
IDLE-N
275.
0. 04
37.
IDLE-D
HOSE AT RE
SERVOIR
DAMAGED BY
BATTERY ACID.
4 9010 1979 VOLK
OMMENTS: PASS.
HC,PPM
89 STATE MOD 46.
32.
CO'/. NO/ PPM
0. 03 2496. 40 MPH
0. 29 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPfi
5 9010 197? VOLK S9 1975 FTP 0.23 0. 38 343.89 3.91 25.29
HWY FET 0.11 0.16 261.70 5.29 33.7
HC, PPM
coy.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
6.
0. 01
1155.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
9.
0. 01
1051.
30 MPH
0.
0. 01
42.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
5.
0. 01
40.
idle-n
2.
0. 01
32.
2500 RP
3.
0. 01
37.
idle-n
6.
0. 01
44.
idle-d
STATE MOD
a.
0. 01
1010.
40 MPH
0.
0. 01
45.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
561.
0. 02
35.
IDLE-n
149.
0. 00
173.
2500 Rp
53.
0. 00
33.
idle-n
22.
0. 01
52.
idle-d
COMMENTS: FAILED ESR TEST.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
a 9010 19 0 0 1975 FTP 0.34 0. 81 363.91 3.33 24.23
HWY FET
0. 15 0.
12 262.
40 5.
24 33. 71
HC,PPM
CO 7.
NO/ PPM
50 CRUIS
11.
0. 01
1152.
50 MPH
LOD 2MOD
15.
0. 01
1101.
30 MPH
4.
0. 01
39.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
6.
0. 01
33.
IDLE-N
6.
0. 01
83.
2500 RPM
S.
0. 01
26.
IDLE-N
27.
0. 03
6.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
14.
0. 01
1063.
40 MPH
3.
0. 01
40.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
621.
0. 01
39.
IDLE-N
280.
0. 03
150.
2500 RPM
143.
0. 02
38.
IDLE-N
161.
0. 01
54.
IDLE-D
3MMENTS: VAC HOSE FOR EGR RESERVOIR REPLACED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING GF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
VEH
MODEL
TEST
EMISSION RESULTS
NO
NO
YEAR MAKE
CID TYPE
HC, PPM
CO"/.
NO, PPM
1
501 1
1975 FORD
351 LOD 2M0D
1.
o
o
IU
55, 30 MPH
3.
0. 01
29. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
46.
0. 01
17. IDLE-N
1.
0. 03
34. 2500 RP
0.
0. 01
28. IDLE—N
4.
0. 01
44. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
4.
0. 04
04. 40 MPH
3.
0. 01
29. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
VEH
MODEL
TEST
EMISSION RESULTS
NO
NO
YEAR
MAKE
CID TYPE
HC,PPM
CO 7.
NO, PPM
1
8012
1 978
FORD
302 LOD 2M0D
22.
O
o
84.
30 MPH
IS.
0. 01
47.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
137.
0. 92
27.
IDLE-N
16.
0. 02
40.
2500 RPM
15.
0. 03
55.
IDLE-N
1 1.
0. 02
57.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
16.
0. 01
153.
40 MPH
12.
0. 01
55.
IDLE-N
-OMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
Al> i GM07IVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS; INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING QF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
VEH
MODEL
TEST
EMISSION RESULTS
NO
NO
YEAR
MAKE
CID TYPE
HC,PPM
CO"/.
NO/ PPM
1
7013
1 977
FORD
302 LQD 2M0D
11.
0. 03
44. 30 MPH
4.
0. 01
26. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
72.
0. 33
32. IDLE-N
1.
0. 01
32. 2500 RP
10.
0. 02
27. IDLE-N
13.
0. 01
37. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
4.
0. 03
131. 40 MPH
4.
0. 01
27. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
VEH
MODEL
TEST
EMI
SSION RES
ULTS
NO
NO
YEAR
MAKE
CID
TYPE
HC, PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
1
6014
1976
TOYO
97
LOD 2M0D
2.
0. 03
148. 30 MPH
3.
0. 01
16. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
14.
0. 02
17. IDLE-N
0.
0. 01
34. 2500 RPM
10.
0. 01
19. IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
2.
0. 04
287. 40 MPH
3.
0. 01
19. IDLE-N
jMMENTS: FAIL UNDERHOOD.
HCiPPM COX NO,PPM
2 6014 1976 TOYO 97 STATE MOD 5. 0. 12 489. 40 MPH
12. 0. 02 0. IDLE-N
3MMENTS: INCORRECT PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.- INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 69-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN SMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
7 6014 1976 TOYO 97 1975 FTP 0.23 2. IS 435.67 1.25 20 IS
HWY FET 0. 58 17. 61 258. 90 2. 07 30. 7
HC,PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
2.
0. 03
288.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
0.
0. 03
147.
30 MPH
0.
0. 01
19.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
4.
0. 01
15.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 01
27.
2500 RP
3.
0. 01
15.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
STATE MOD
5.
0. 05
319.
40 MPH
6.
0. 02
17.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
62.
0. 01
13.
idle-n
213.
0. 03
26.
2500 Rp
49.
0. 01
12.
idle-n
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
COMMENTS: LI MITER CAP MIS,PCV PLUGGED WITH DIRT.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP, HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPS
6014 1976 TQYO 97 1975 FTP 0.26 2.56 427.24 1.33 20.54
HWY FET 0. 61 17. 48 245. 30 2. 13 32. 28
HC,PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
1.
0. 02
369.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
0.
0. 02
182.
30 MPH
0.
0. 01
19.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
29.
0. 01
19.
idle-n
0.
0. 02
36.
2500 RPM
10.
0. 01
19.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
0.
0. 05
407.
40 MPH
4.
0. 01
20.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
122.
0. 01
14.
IDLE-N
373.
0. 05
36.
2500 RPM
71.
0. 02
16.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
Comments: pcv replaced.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENV IRONrlhiMTAL SYSTEMS) INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST EMISSION RESULTS
TYPE HC.PPM CO"/. NO) PPM
8015
197S
FORD
LOD 2M0D
26.
0. 00
502.
24.
0. 00
22.
4SPD IDL
722.
3. 33
16.
30.
0. 01
27.
46.
0. 01
17.
32.
0. 00
12.
STATE MOD
23.
0. 01
726.
21.
0. 01
27.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE—N
2500 RP'
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
COMMENTS: 03VI0US PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST
LOS ANGELES
RESULTS
TESTED THIS MONTH
"EST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 8016 197S CHEV 305 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
DMMENTS: FAIL UNDERHOOD.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC. PPM C07. NO# PPM
STATE MOD
7.
10.
7.
5.
9.
10.
7.
S.
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
88.
25.
31.
47.
37.
25.
203.
30.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
HC/ PPM C07. NO. PPM
2 8016 1978 CHEV 305 STATE MOD 178. 0.03 219. 40 MPH
166. 0. 04 0. IDLE-N
DMMENTS: FAIL CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN SMS/MI
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
8016
MODEL
YEAR
1 978
MAKE CID
CHEV
TEST
TYPE
EMISSION RESULTS
1975
HWY
FTP
FET
0.
COMMENT
50 CRUIS
LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
4SPD DIS
SHED-GMS
LIMITER CAP MIS. PCV HOSE COLLAPSED,CARD
VIBRATION DAMPNER SLIPPING.
HC CO
C02
NOXC MPG
79 9. 77
597. 36
1. 17 14. 43
.15 0. 85
396. 60
1.
19 22. 2c
HC, PPM
CO'/. NO, PPM
4.
0. 01
93.
50 MPH
4.
0. 01
74.
30 MPH
9.
0. 01
16.
IDLE-N
5.
0. 01
26.
IDLE-N
4.
0. 01
39.
2500 Rpr
7.
0. 01
27.
IDLE—N
7.
0. 01
22.
idle-d
4.
0. 01
18S.
40 MPH
1 cL,
0. 01
17.
idle-n
31.
0. 01
14.
idle-n
69.
0. 01
32.
2500 Rpr
27.
0. 00
16.
IDLE—N
20.
0. 01
17.
idle-d
7. 46
diurnal
3. 77
HOT SOAK
11. 23
total
VENT SIGNAL HOSE DISABLED.
HC, PPM COY. NO, PPM
4 8016 1978 CHEV 305 STATE MOD 16. 0. 03 273. 40 MPH
S. 0. 02 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP» HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
N0 NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
5 3016 1978 CHEV 305 1975 FTP 0.56 7.03 666.96 0.94 13.06
HWY FET 0.08 1.03 473.70 0.36 18.65
HC, PPM
C07.
NO. PPM
50 CRUIS
0.
0. 01
97.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
3.
0. 01
80.
30 MPH
4.
0. 01
29.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
1.
0. 01
30.
IDLE-N
4.
0. 01
48.
2500 RPM
1.
0. 01
31.
IDLE-N
4.
0. 01
64.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
2.
0. 01
145.
40 MPH
0.
0. 01
29.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
60.
0. 01
30.
IDLE-N
115.
0. 01
62.
2500 RPM
48.
0. 01
35.
IDLE-N
42.
0. 01
74.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: VIBRATION DAMPER SLIPPING.
CV HOSE DEF AND CARB VENT SIGNAL HOSE DISABLED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPS
6 3016 1978 CHEV 305 1975 FTP 0.44 7.35 656.99 0. S8 13.25
HWY FET 0.08 1.41 474.10 0.84 18.61
HC,PPM
CO'/.
NO,PPM
50 CRUIS
0.
0.
01
79.
SO MPH
LOD 2M0D
2.
0.
01
65.
30 MPH
3.
0.
01
22.
IDLE-n
4SPD IDL
3.
0.
01
21.
IDLE-n
2.
0.
01
36.
2500 Rpn
2.
0.
01
23.
idle-n
5.
0.
01
41.
idle-d
STATE MOD
3.
0.
01
119.
40 MPH
2.
0.
01
21.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
104.
0.
01
24.
idle-n
137.
0.
01
56.
2500 Rph
47.
0.
01
23.
idle-n
36.
0.
01
39.
IDLE-D
SHED-GMS
6. 71
3. 14
9. 35
DIURNAL
HOT SOAK
TOTAL
COMMENTS; PCV HOSE AND CARS VENT SIGNAL HOSE REPLACED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 7017 1977 CADI 425 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
COMMENTS: FAIL HC AND CO.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC. PPM CQ7. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
38.
201.
274.
31.
223.
180.
12.
170.
0. 06
2. 41
2. 75
0. 09
2. 75
2. 69
0. 01
2. 17
131.
13.
19.
63.
19.
23.
256.
26.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
2 7017 1977 CADI
COMMENTS: FAIL HC AND CO.
HC, PPM
425 STATE MOD 43.
236.
C07. NO, PPM
0. 13 491. 40 MPH
5. 24 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS* INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 66-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTPjHFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID
3 7017 1977 CADI 425
TEST
TYPE
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
2. 91
O. 41
EMISSION RESULTS
CQ C02 NOXC MPG
59. 60
5. 62
623. 60
463.40
1. 73
1. 05
12- 22
1Q. 7Z
COMMENTS:
HC, PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
6.
0. 02
153.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
33.
0. OS
S6.
30 MPH
139.
1. 70
24.
idle-n
4SPD 1DL
159.
1. S3
21.
idle-n
12.
0. 03
56.
2500 Rp*
212.
2. 44
17.
I dle-n
150.
2. 37
23.
IDLE-d
STATE MOD
10.
0. 03
212.
40 MPH
140.
1. 94
25.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
901.
0. 68
23.
IDLE-n
195.
0. 03
96.
2900 Rpf-
90S.
1. 61
14.
idle-n
910.
1. 76
19.
IDLE-q
CO MEASURED
VALUE 5. 01
TO 10. 0-
HC, PPM COX NO, PPM
4 7017 1977 CADI 425 STATE MOD 55. 0.91 225. 40 MPH
29. 0. 08 0. IDLE-n
COMMENTS: PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
5 7017 1977 CADI 425 1975 FTP 2. 13 40. 82 634. 31 1. 64 12. 59
HWY FET 0.29 3.37 464.40 1.82 18.84
HC* PPM
CO'/.
NO.PPM
50 CRUIS
10.
0. 01
157.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
33.
0. 06
87.
30 MPH
187.
1. 05
22.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
168.
1. 00
26.
IDLE-N
8.
0. 02
53.
2500 RPM
167.
1. 26
23.
IDLE-N
106.
1. 07
61.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
15.
0. 04
185.
40 MPH
187.
1. 45
22.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
861.
0. 29
19.
IDLE-N
368.
0. 08
23.
2500 RPM
796.
0. 26
17.
IDLE-N
817.
0. 37
51.
IDLE-D
30MMENTS: ALL SYSTEMS OK.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL. SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 6018 1976 DODO 313 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM COY. NO, PPM
135.
167.
245.
63.
187.
172.
109.
193.
2. 09
2. 78
3. 81
1. 55
3. 00
3. 23
2. 96
3. 36
277.
35
19
141
29
32
196
27
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
idle-n
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
2 6018 1976 DODG 318 STATE MOD 177. 3. 57 1292. 40 MPH
399. 8. 43 0. IDLE—N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EFA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
test VEH
NO NO
3 6013
MODEL
YEAR
1976
MAKE CID
DODG 318
TESt
TYPE
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
7. 41
3. 28
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
35. 14
58. 10
500. 66
404. 70
4. 50 13. 49
4. 42 17. 51
HC, PPM
C07.
NOi PPM
50 CRUIS
39.
0. 14
1123.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
162.
2. 70
269.
30 MPH
210.
3. 42
34.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
203.
3. 28
33.
IDLE-N
96.
3. 19
88.
2500 RPM
229.
3. 33
33.
IDLE-N
185.
3. 48
36.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
71.
0. 19
1371.
40 MPH
311.
4. 66
31.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1526.
3. 94
25.
IDLE-N
998.
0. 42
217.
2500 RPM
1357.
2. 89
26.
IDLE-N
1448.
3. 04
30.
IDLE-D
CO MEASURED
5. 01 TO
10. 0, TIMG
-5
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS, IDL
AIR CLEANER SNSR LEAKING. CARB INLET FUEL HOSE CRACKED
VAC LINE TO EGR VALVE PLUGGED,PCV PLUGGED WITH DIRT
DIFFERENCE FROM VACCUM BREAK SPECIFICATION 0. 021 TO . 040 RICH.
HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
4 6018 1976 DODG 318 STATE MOD 222. 6. 25 607. 40 MPH
290. 2. 65 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH
NO NO
5 6018
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1976 DODG 318
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
3. 73 35. 60
2. 35 45. 03
544. 52
407. 90
4. 43
4. 66
14. 50
18. 2*
COMMENTS:
HC,PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
42.
0. 17
932.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
71.
0. 13
723.
30 MPH
124.
1. 02
35.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
242.
0. 83
29.
idle-n
22.
0. 26
163.
2500 Rpr
185.
0. 68
23.
IDLE-N
144.
0. 34
40.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
43.
0. 11
1225.
40 MPH
157.
1. 25
30.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1117.
0. 93
26.
idle-n
869.
0. 16
205.
2500 Rpf
1050.
0. 71
23.
idle-n
1137.
0. 79
37.
IDLE-D
VAC LINE TO
EGR VLV
PLGD, PCV
VLV PLGD WITH
DIRT.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
6 60IS 19 0 1 1975 FTP 3. 87 27.27 570.26 2.02 14.19
HWY FET 0. 97 4. 22 463. 10 2. 75 IS. 76
HC,PPM
CO'/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
44.
0. 19
562.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
109.
0. 18
209.
30 MPH
465.
0. 47
42.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
638.
0. 41
48.
IDLE-N
63.
0. 39
111.
2500 RPM
455.
0. 37
43.
IDLE-N
237.
0. 35
76.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
120.
0. 34
541.
40 MPH
454.
0. 52
50.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
932.
0. 40
42.
IDLE-N
1789.
0. 86
102.
2500 RPM
1869.
0. 27
50.
IDLE-N
1934.
0. 23
79.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: PCV VLV REPLACED,UNPLUGGED EGR VAC HOSE.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM CO"/. NO, PPM
1 6019 1976 MERC 140 LOD 2M0D 23. 0.31 205. 30 MPH
COMMENTS: FAIL EGR.
13.
0.
02
16.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
17.
0.
06
17.
idle-n
16.
0.
41
40.
2500 RPK
13.
0.
03
17.
idle-n
0.
0.
00
0.
idle-d
STATE MOD
19.
0.
24
22S.
40 MPH
13.
0.
03
17.
idle-n
2 6019 1976 MERC
COMMENTS: INCORRECT PASS.
HC,PPM
140 STATE MOD 51.
16.
CO'/. NO, PPM
0. 37 569. 40 MPH
0. 03 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP.HFET IN GMS/KI
TEST VEH MODEL
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID
7 6019 1976 MERC 140
TEST
EMISSION RESULTS •
TYPE
HC CO
C02
NOXC MP <5
975 FTP 1
. 54 28. 43
451. 29
0. 97 17. 72
HWY FET
0. 60 12. 57
310. 50
0.
95 26. 70
HC. PPM
CO'/. NO; PPM
50 CRUIS
3.
0. 14
131.
50 iiPH
LOD 2M0D
16.
0. 24
226.
30 MPH
12.
0. 02
21.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
35.
0. 03
19.
IDLE-N
S.
0. 25
41.
2500 RPM
12.
0. 02
21.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
16.
0. 21
292.
40 MPH
10.
0. 02
21.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
513.
0. 08
13.
IDLE-N
874.
0. 33
34.
2500 RPM
378.
0. 06
14.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS, ALL SYSTEMS OK.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS* INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TE5T VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
1 5020 1975 TOYO . 97 LOD 2M0D 24. 0. 18 407. 30 MPH
50.
0.
19
11.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
47.
0.
40
10.
idle-n
7.
0.
20
24.
2500 RPfl
41.
0.
24
9.
idle-n
0.
0.
00
0.
idle-d
STATE MOD
23.
0.
17
477.
40 MPH
45.
0.
19
12.
idle-n
CQMMENT5: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
1
8021
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1978 DATS
85 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
COMMENTS; OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
3. 0. 02 93. 30 MPH
16. 0. 37 7. IDLE-N
6. 0. 01 16. IDLE-N
0. 0. 01 52. 2500 RPM
8. 0. 01 15. IDLE-N
0. 0. 00 0. IDLE-D
29. 0. 05 126. 40 MPH
40. 0. 34 6. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS/INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 3022 1973 TOYO 97 LOD 2M0D
EMISSION RESULTS
HC» PPM C07. NO* PPM
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
10.
0. 04 244. 30 MPH
2.
0.
01
31.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
8.
0.
01
29.
idle-n
0.
0.
02
39.
2500 Rpr
6.
0.
01
29.
idle-n
0.
0.
00
0.
idle-d
STATE MOD
2.
0.
05
250.
40 MRH
2.
0.
01
31.
IDLE-n
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 60-03-3971 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TaST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 6023 1976 FORD 140 LQD 2MCD
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HCj PPM GOV. HQ, PPM
STATE MOD
COMMENTS: QiJVIOUS PASS.
5.
10.
41.
3.
23.
0.
4.
5.
0. 03
0 02
0. 03
0, 03
0 02
0. 00
0. 03
0. OS
320.
31.
25.
65.
24.
0.
374.
31.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE—D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE
1 8024 1978 MERC
COMMENTS: 03VI0US PASS.
CID TYPE
HC/PPM
co*/.
NO, PPM
250 LOD 2M0D
20.
0. 02
101. 30 MPH
4.
0. 01
41. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
9.
0. 01
51. IDLE-N
9.
0. 02
450. 2500 RP1
5.
0. 01
37. IDLE-N
12.
0. 01
121. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
17.
0. 02
332. 40 MPH
3.
0. 02
37. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 6025 1976 HOND 91 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC,PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
11.
98
266
28
168
0
20
28
0. 18
0. 12
0. 10
0. 21
0. 14
0. 00
0. 19
0. 14
928.
21
15
71
20
0
1139
28
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC.
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
2 6025 1976 HOND 91 STATE MOD 112. 0.22 2308. 40 MPH
154. 0.27 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
6025 1976
HOND
91
1975 FTP
HWY FET
1. 28
0. 08
6. 76
1. 86
288. 90
222. 60
2. 19 29. 24
3. 02 39. 2"
HC,PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
2.
0. 12
587.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
4.
0. 15
687.
30 MPH
72.
0. 15
16.
IDLE—N
4SPD IDL
256.
0. 10
12.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 13
58.
2500 RPC
164.
0. 09
10.
IDLE—N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
0.
0. 17
769.
40 MPH
59.
0. 16
17.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
249.
0. 09
10.
idle-n
1145.
0. 10
69.
2500 Rp*
1233.
0. 04
10.
idle-n
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
COMMENTS: MIXTURE ADJ PLUG OK,TIMG-10,THERMOSNSR STUCK CLOSED,FULL ADV.
HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
4 6025 1976 HOND 91 STATE MOD 151. 0.22 2256. 40 MPH
290. 0. 76 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC WITH WAIVER.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NQXC MPG
5 6025 1976 HOND 91 1975 FTP 1.36 7.99 233.22 3.03 29.50
HWY FET 0.23 2.93 214.70 4.01 40.31
HC, PPM
coy.
NO. PPM
50 CRUIS
6.
0. 31
1607.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
25.
0. 32
1803.
30 MPH
171.
0. 64
81.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
171.
0. 57
65.
IDLE-N
10.
0. 23
134.
2500 RPM
134.
0. 41
81.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
32.
0. 31
2113.
40 MPH
210.
0. 93
73.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
2749.
0. 48
67.
IDLE-N
2288.
0. 19
150.
2500 RPM
2794.
0. 56
61.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS.THERMOSNSR DEF,FULL ADV.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC,PPM C07. NO, PPM
1 6026 1976 AMC 25E
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
LOD 2M0D
3.
0. 02
448.
30 MPH
66.
1. 26
35.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
113.
1. 63
33.
idle-n
8.
0. 10
159.
2500 Rpf
101.
1. 37
34.
IDLE-N
93.
0. 59
63.
idle-d
STATE MOD
0.
0. 01
359.
40 MPH
47.
1. 92
29.
IDLE-N
2 6026 1976 AMC
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
HC, PPM
258 STATE MOD 18.
98.
CO*/. NO, PPM
0. 04 693. 40 MPH
3. 42 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP.HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
6026
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
1976 AMC
258 1975 FTP 0.76 14.99 447.31 2.14 18.75
HWY FET 0. 07 1. 03 370. 90 2. 78 23. 79
HC,PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
3.
0. 01
342.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
0.
0. 00
369.
30 MPH
34.
0. 52
31.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
49.
0. 59
29.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
130.
2500 RPM
31.
0. 46
28.
IDLE-N
10.
0. 17
25.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
0.
0. 00
335.
40 MPH
54.
1. 41
31.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
97.
0. 00
29.
IDLE-N
286.
0. 00
156.
2500 RPM
17.
0. 00
32.
IDLE-N
*0.
0. 00
41.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS, AIR FILTER DIRTY,CHOKE OFF 2NL,
CARB PURGE AND BOWL VENT HOSES DISCNCTD.
PROPER CARB NUMBER BUT NO BOWL VENT SYSTEMS.
COOLANT TEMPERATURE OVERRIDE LETS IN VAC ADV CONSTANTLY
4 6026 1976 AMC
COMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
HC.PPM
258 STATE MOD 24.
18.
CO'/. NOi PPM
0. 04 250. 40 MPH
0. 03 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 6S-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTPiHFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO CQ2 NOXC MPG
6026
1976
AMC
!5S
1975 FTP
HWY FET
0. 44
0. 04
6. 27
0. 23
431. 35
344. 70
3. 44 20. 03
4. 74 25. 69
50 CRUIS
LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
4SPD DIS
HC,PPM
3.
11.
10.
6.
1.
6.
14.
7.
5.
71.
121.
37.
36.
C07.
0. 01
0. 02
0. 02
0. 01
0. 01
0. 01
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
01
02
02
01
01
01
01
NOiPPM
634.
660.
47.
33.
173.
39.
63.
812.
36.
30.
102.
37.
51.
COMMENTS: NO VAC TO EGR VLV.
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE—N
2500 RPf
IDLE-N
idle-d
40 MPH
IDLE-N
idle-n
2500 RPM
idle-n
idle-d
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTPiHFET IN GMS/MI
test VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO CQ2 NOXC MPG
6 6026 19 0 0 1975 FTP 0.57 5.60 436.45 3.82 19.85
HWY FET 0. 04 0. 21 350. 40 4. 84 25. 28
HC,PPM
coy.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
21.
0. 02
695.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
16.
0. 02
897.
30 MPH
13.
0. 02
56.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
9.
0. 01
39.
IDLE-N
6.
0. 01
239.
2500 RPM
11.
0. 01
45.
IDLE-N
13.
0. 01
63.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
14.
0. 01
1106.
40 MPH
7.
0. 02
47.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
19.
0. 02
36.
IDLE-N
127.
0. 04
366.
2500 RPM
31.
0. 03
39.
IDLE-N
19.
0. 02
57.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: EGR VAC RESTORED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2971 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST EMISSION RESULTS
TYPE HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
1 3027 1973 CADI 425 LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
0. 01
SS. 30 MPH
4.
0.
02
30.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
7.
0.
02
31.
IDLE-N
1.
0.
02
40.
2500 Rpr
4.
0.
01
33.
idle-n
4.
0.
01
49.
idle-d
STATE MOD
4.
0.
01
134.
40 MPH
3.
0.
01
26.
idle-n
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS*INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2971 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST veh
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 7028 1977 VOLK 97 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
ia.
23.
21.
17.
36.
0.
19.
33.
0. 12
0. 60
0. 08
0. 16
0. 31
0. 00
0. 19
0. 71
61.
30.
1.
IS.
2.
0.
189.
49.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO
YEAR
MAKE CID TYPE
HC,PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
1 9029
1979
CHEV 305 LOD 2M0D
1.
o
o
h*
92. 30 MPH
14.
0. 01
16. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
40.
0. 01
12. IDLE-N
4.
0. 01
51. 2500 RPtf
8.
0. 01
16. IDLE-N
7.
0. 01
31. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
0.
0. 01
136. 40 MPH
9.
0. 01
16. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2971 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
N0 NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
1 5030 1975 DATS 85 LOD 2M0D 6. 0.05 159. 30 MPH
57. 0. 04 24. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL 80. 0. 09 13. IDLE-N
24. 0. 05 43. 2500 RPM
71. 0. 07 19. IDLE-N
0. 0. 00 0. IDLE-D
STATE MOD 21. 0. 03 466. 40 MPH
;OMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
13. 0. 02 3. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NG NO
YEAR
MAKE CID TYPE
HC,PPM
C07.
NO,PPM
1 6031
1976
PONT 350 LOD 2M0D
18.
0. 03
1011. 30 MPH
21.
0, 02
S3. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
20.
0. 02
56. IDLE-N
5.
0. 02
254. 2500 RPM
20.
0. 02
61. IDLE-N
19.
0. 02
98. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
16.
0. 03
2003. 40 MPH
15.
0. 02
74. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 6032 1976 PONT 350 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM CO7. NO, PPM
17.
44.
13.
0.
27.
19.
14.
64.
0. 01
0. 01
0. 00
0. 01
0. 00
0. 10
0. 01
0. 03
572. 30 MPH
36. IDLE-N
34.
180.
34.
39.
1546.
39.
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 60-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
VEH
MODEL TEST
EMISSION RESULTS
NO
NO
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
HC, PPM
CO'/.
N0»PPM
1
6033
1976 CHEV 350 LOD 2M0D
3.
0. 02
242. 30 MPH
10,
0. 02
S3. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
103
0. 02
79. IDLE-N
5.
0. 02
136. 2500 RPrl
77.
0. 02
91- IDLE-N
6.
0. 02
294. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
3.
0. 02
833. 40 MPH
5.
0. 02
99. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 5034 1975 VOLK 90 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
60.
5.
6.
132.
7.
0.
S3.
9.
1. 71
0. Oo
0. OS
0. 07
0. 10
0. 00
2. 45
0. 07
644. 30 MPH
52. IDLE-N
51.
176.
43.
0.
710.
55.
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 5035 1975 FORD 140 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
EMISSION RESULTS
HC.PPM COX NO,PPM
47.
57.
425.
26.
72.
0.
39.
41.
0. 39
0. IS
2. 22
0. 26
0. 23
0. 00
0. 39
0. 17
74-6. 30 MPH
34. IDLE-N
19.
76.
35.
0.
1097.
40.
COMMENTS: 03VI0US PASS.
IDLE-N
2500 RPfl
IDLE-N
idle-d
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
test VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
0MMENTS: FAILED CO.
LOD 2M0D
9.
0. 12
440.
30 MPH
401.
0. 56
129.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
196.
0. 63
122.
IDLE-N
17.
0. 15
115.
2500 RPM
75.
0. 64
113.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
8.
0. 14
593.
40 MPH
76.
0. 54
116.
IDLE-N
HC> PPM COX NO/ PPM
2 6036 1976 VOLK 97 STATE MOD 31. 0.25 1022. 40 MPH
25. 0. 49 0. IDLE-N
OMMENTS: INCORRECT PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
6036
MODEL
YEAR MAKE
FTP/HFET IN GMS/MI
CID
1976 VOLK 97
TEST
TYPE
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
L 27 4. 72 442. 19 1. 46 19. 57
0.32 1.92 279.20 1.62 31.31
HC/PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
9.
0. 06
299.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
6.
0. 05
238.
30 MPH
182.
0. 24
63.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
60.
0. 21
70.
idle-n
6.
0. 05
58.
2500 Rpn
120.
0. 20
68.
idle-n
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
STATE MOD
12.
0. 06
298.
40 MPH
257.
0. 24
68.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
2054.
0. 06
58.
idle-n
1694.
0. 06
45.
2500 RPH
2150.
0. 05
59.
idle-n
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP NA> TIMG-5, IRPM -225,EGR VLV HAS EXCESSIVE CARBON
BUILD UP. VAC ADV LINE CNCTD TO EGR TEMP CONTROL VLV.
EGR VLV LINE CNCTD TO VAC ADV UNIT FROM EGR VLV.
-------
automotive environmental systems, inc.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
6036 1976 VOLK 77 1975 FTP 1. 50 6. 15 375. 17
HWY FET 0. 81 2. 23 236. 70
2. Q2 22. 79
3. 68 36. 53
HC,PPM
COY.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
46.
0. 12
1004.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
26.
0. 11
656.
30 MPH
34.
0. 36
50.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
13.
0. 34
58.
IDLE-N
17.
0. 15
74.
2500 RPM
15.
0. 33
56.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
33.
0. 10
1060.
40 MPH
39.
0. 32
56.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
2004.
0. 37
52.
IDLE-N
1349.
0. 17
99.
2500 RPM
2080.
0. 36
54.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: VAC LINE REROUTED PROPERLY AT EGR
VAC ADV LINE ROUTED PROPERLY FOR
VLV EGR VLV CLEANED.
ADEQUATE VAC,IRPM +225.
-------
automotive environmental systems.inc.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC,PPM CO7. NO, PPM
1 7037 1977 DATS 85 LOD 2M0D 10. 0.02 611. 30 MPH
1. 0.01 24. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL 4. 0. 01 16. IDLE-N
5. 0. 01 80. 2500 RPM
4. 0.01 15. IDLE-N
0. 0. 00 0. IDLE-D
STATE MOD 13. 0. 02 772. 40 MPH
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
1. 0.01 31. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS/INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
1 6038 1976 CADI 500 LOD 2M0D 12. 0.01 64. 30 MPH
18.
0.
03
35.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
14.
0.
01
39.
IDLE-N
1.
0.
01
65.
2500 RPM
10.
0.
01
31.
IDLE-N
9.
0.
64
30.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
7.
0.
02
114.
40 MPH
3.
0.
01
38.
IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO
NO
YEAR
MAKE CID TYPE
HC, PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
1
3039
1978
BUIC 231 LOD 2M0D
11.
0. 02
78. 30 MPH
23.
0. 01
24. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
24.
0. 01
22. IDLE-N
12.
0. 01
39. 2500 RPM
28.
0. 01
23. IDLE-N
10.
0. 01
44. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
a.
0. 03
101. 40 MPH
13.
0. 01
23. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TSST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 9040 1979 HOND 91 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC» PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
JOMMENTS: O3VI0US PASS.
1.
84.
9.
18.
0.
2.
1.
0. 06
0. 12
0. 10
0. 07
0. 14
0. 00
0. 08
0. 12
342.
31.
27.
54.
27.
0.
399.
35.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 5041 1975 CHEV 350 LQD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
He. ppm coy. no, ppm
19.
16.
34.
11.
20.
21.
23.
IS.
0. 14
0. 02
0. 12
0. 06
0. 05
0. 03
0. 05
0. 02
259.
22
22
107
24
53
609
27
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE—N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 7042 1977 CHEV 350 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC» PPM CO7. NO, PPM
STATE MOD
3.
8.
9.
10.
1.
4.
2.
1.
0. 02
0. 01
0. 02
0. 02
0. 01
0. 01
0. 02
0. 01
100.
24
SO
46
26
71
166
25
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO
YEAR
MAKE
CID TYPE
HC,PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
5043
1975
OLDS
350 LOD 2M0D
37.
0. 03
484. 30 MPH
122.
1. 74
40. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
210.
0. 95
24. IDLE—N
13.
0. 01
166. 2500 RPM
166.
1. 53
26. IDLE—N
132.
1. 66
31. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
3.
0. 00
227. 40 MPH
177.
0. 94
24. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
2 5043 1975 OLDS
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
HC,PPM
350 STATE MOD 7.
143.
CO*/. NO, PPM
0. 02 417. 40 MPH
3. 14 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP.HFET IN GMS/MI
test veh
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
5043
1975
OLDS 350
1975 FTP
HWY FET
1. ol 25. 38
0. 14 1. 04
648. 73
529. 90
2. 08 12. 79
2. 13 16. 67
HC,PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
7.
0. 01
357.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
5.
0. 04
223.
30 MPH
250.
1. 17
22.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
259.
0. 37
18.
IDLE-N
1.
0. 03
119.
2500 RPM
188.
1. 00
22.
IDLE-N
112.
0. 92
28.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
10.
0. 04
215.
40 MPH
165.
1. 25
24.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
655.
0. 18
15.
IDLE-N
223.
0. 04
185.
2500 RPM
588.
0. 29
13.
IDLE-N
569.
0. 23
20.
IDLE-D
SHED-GMS
1. 13
DIURNAL
5. 12
HOT SOAK
6. 25
TOTAL
rHMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS.CARS BOWL HOSE AT CNSTR CRACKED OPEN.
J TEMPERTURE CONTROL VLV LETS VAC OPEN E5R VLV BELOW 61
DEGREES.
HC. PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
4 5043 1975 OLDS 350 STATE MOD 29. 0. 05 445. 40 MPH
333. 0. 25 0. IDLE-N
OMMENTS: FAILED HC.
0 3043 1975 OLDS
OMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
HC,PPM
350 STATE MOD 15.
62.
C07. NO, PPM
0. 02 397. 40 MPH
0. 28 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 69-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
5 5043 1975 OLDS 350 1975 FTP 0.66 7. 51 700. 15 2. 14 12 43
HUY FET 0. 08 0. 17 520. 30 2. 21 17. 03
HCi PPM
C0%
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
5.
0. 02
376.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
S.
0. 02
303.
30 MPH
19.
0. 02
33.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
14.
0. 02
31.
idle-n
1.
0. 02
131.
2500 RPM
11.
0. 02
35.
IDLE-N
6.
0. 02
69.
idle-d
STATE MOD
3.
0. 01
252.
40 MPH
9.
0. 02
36.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
60.
0. 02
33.
idle-n
130.
0. 02
208.
2500 RPM
35.
0. 02
36.
idle-n
33.
0. 01
76.
idle-d
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS,CARS BOWL HOSE AT CNSTR CRACKED OPEN.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CD C02 NOXC MPS
6 5043 19 0 0 1975 FTP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.43
HWY FET 0. 07 0. 12 526. 00 2. 19 16. 36
HC.PPM
CO*/.
NO, PPM
50 CRUIS
2.
0.
01
313.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
9.
0.
02
349.
30 MPH
13.
0.
01
29.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
24.
0.
01
2B.
IDLE-N
3.
0.
02
109.
2500 RPM
20.
0.
01
31.
IDLE-N
6.
0.
01
60.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
5.
0.
02
296.
40 MPH
3.
0.
01
31.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
49.
0.
02
30.
IDLE-N
139.
0.
02
205.
2500 RPM
30.
0.
02
31.
IDLE-N
31.
0.
02
67.
IDLE-D
5HED-GMS
0. 64
5. 25
5. 39
DIURNAL
HOT SOAK
TOTAL
CQMrtENT3: LIMITER CAP MIS, CARD SOWL HOSE AT CNSTR REPAIRED.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 6044 1976 CHEV 250 LOD 2M0D
EMISSION RESULTS
HC,PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
COMMENTS: FAILED HC.
37.
0. 06
75. 30 MPH
71.
0.
03
IB.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
281.
0.
08
14.
IDLE-n
42.
0.
13
41.
2500 RPM
104.
0.
04
15.
idle-n
62.
0.
02
21.
idle-d
STATE MOD
13.
0.
04
179.
40 MPH
60.
0.
01
IS.
IDLE-N
HC, PPM CO'/. NO, PPM
2 6044 1976 CHEV 250 STATE MOD 28. 0.03 378. 40 MPH
40. 0. 02 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 5045 1975 CHEV 140 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM COV. NO. PPM
STATE MOD
23.
10.
14.
9.
9.
0.
23.
10.
0. 19
0. 04
0. 09
0. 16
0. 06
0. 00
0. 12
0. 04
493.
24
23
90
23
0
601
27
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM CO7. NO, PPM
1 3046 1775 HOND 91 LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: FAILED HC.
19.
0. 19
814. 30 MPH
113.
0.
25
43.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
256.
0.
16
44.
IDLE-N
21.
0.
14
84.
2500 RPM
179.
0.
23
48.
IDLE-N
0.
0.
00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
13.
0.
14
865.
40 MPH
42.
0.
30
52.
IDLE-N
2 5046 1975 HOND
COMMENTS: FAILED HC.
HC, PPM
91 STATE MOD 26.
12S.
CO*/. NO, PPM
0. 20 775. 40 MPH
0. 30 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2971 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP# HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST
NO
5
VEH
NO
5046
MODEL
YEAR
1? 0
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1975 FTP
HWY FET
HC
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NOXC MPG
0. 61 10. 11
0. 03 0. 71
340. 72
249. 70
1. 73 24. 22
2. 24 35. 35
HCj PPM
coy.
NQ, PPM
50 CRUIS
1.
0. 04
546.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
0.
0. 04
427.
30 MPH
0.
0. 10
50.
idle-n
4SPD IDL
27.
0. 15
41.
IDLE-N
2.
0. 07
83.
2500 RPM
17.
0. 13
33.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
0.
0. 04
424.
40 MPH
0.
0. 07
49.
idle-n
4SPD DIS
1760.
0. OS
63.
idle-n
1604.
0. 15
65.
2500 RPM
1715.
0. 12
52.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
idle-d
COMMENTS: THERMOSNSR SWITCH ALLOWING MANIFOLD VAC ADV CONSTANTLY
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST
NO
VEH
NO
MODEL
YEAR
MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE
1 7047 1977 HOND 91 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM CO"/. NOi PPM
STATE MOD
5.
4.
38.
2.
9.
0.
1.
n
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
0. 10
0. 15
0. 10
0. 07
0. 14
0. 00
0. 10
0. 15
921. 30 MPH
35. IDLE-N
33.
BO.
35.
0.
1179.
51.
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
MODEL
TEST
EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO
YEAR
MAKE CID TYPE
HC, PPM
C07.
NO, PPM
1 5043
1975
CHRY 318 LOD 2M0D
14.
0. 04
304. 30 MPH
5.
0. 09
33. IDLE—N
4SPD IDL
9.
0. 11
31. IDLE-N
4.
0. 04
127. 2500 RPM
7.
0. 09
34. IDLE-N
17.
0. 22
49. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
13.
0. 04
1006. 40 MPH
3.
0. 07
41. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS/ INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 43-00-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
EMISSION RESULTS
HCi PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
1 5049 1975 MERC 140 - LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
201.
1. 29
152. 30 MPH
40.
1.
10
49.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
39.
0.
74
49.
IDLE-N
141.
2.
15
41.
2500 RPM
29.
0.
80
48.
IDLE-N
0.
0.
00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
211.
1.
01
233.
40 MPH
45.
1.
64
40.
IDLE-N
2 5049 1975 MERC
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
HC.PPM
140 STATE MOD 233.
81.
CO*/. NO, PPM
1. 35 539. 40 MPH
1.60 0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL
YEAR MAKE CID
TEST
TYPE HC
3 5049 1973 MERC 140
EMISSION RESULTS
CO C02 NGXC MPG
1975 FTP
HWY FET
!. 46 66. 13
1. 42 62. 67
423. 06
269. 60
0. 74
0. 63
16. 33
23. 80
HC, PPM
C0%
NO,PPM
30 CRUIS
66.
2. 37
122.
30 MPH
LOD 2M0D
37.
1. 41
93.
30 MPH
17.
0. 48
49.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
1.
0. 17
44.
IDLE-N
47.
1. 31
38.
2500 RPM
0.
0. 16
44.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
59.
1. 36
143.
40 MPH
2.
0. 07
50.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1043.
0. 05
43.
IDLE—N
1318.
0. 31
27.
2300 RPM
804.
0. 03
39.
IDLE-N
0.
0. 00
0.
IDLE-D
+230,FRESH
AIR DUCT
TORN. FUEL
INLET LINE
COMMENTS; LIMITER CAP MIS, IRF
LEAKING GAS. HOSE FROM DUCT MOTOR VLV ON AIR CANISTER CNCTD TO
VAC SOL. CHOKE THERMOSTAT DEF CLOSES PARTIALLY.
AIR BY-PASS VLV VAC HOSE CNCTD TO DUCT VLV MOTOR FROM VAC SOL.
CHOKE HI RICH, SPARK DELAY VLV MIS.
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
4 3049 1975 MERC 140 STATE MOD 33. 0. 21 326. 40 MPH
26. 0. 03 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS; PASS HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
3 304? 1973 MERC 140 1975 FTP 1. 00 10. 65 304. 66 0. 89 16. 92
HWY FET 0.13 3.91 360.60 0.75 24.13
50 CRUIS
LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
4SPD DIS
COWENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS, IRPM +190 CHOKE
HC, PPM
7.
173.
13.
3.
62.
7.
0.
190.
11.
459.
1404.
537.
0.
HI RICH.
C07.
0. 19
0. 14
0. 06
0. 05
0. 09
0. 05
0. 00
0. 20
0. OS
0. 26
0. 16
0. 11
0. 00
NO, PPM
113.
140.
29.
29.
33.
29.
0.
1S2.
27.
25.
32.
21.
0.
50 MPH
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE—N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
SPARK DELAY VLV MIS, NOT REPLACED PER BRUCE MICHAEL.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 7050 1977 OLDS 350 LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
STATE MOD
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM C07. NO, PPM
16.
9.
31.
7.
12.
10.
11.
a.
0. 02
0. 01
0. 02
0. 02
0. 01
0. 01
0. 02
0. 01
282.
17.
15.
67.
19.
36.
406.
21.
30 MPH
IDLE—N
IDLE-N
2500 RPM
IDLE—N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
COMMENTS: 03VI0US PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMEiNTAL SYSTEMS/ INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH
NO NO
MODEL TEST
YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
1 7031 1977 PLYM 31S LOD 2M0D
4SPD IDL
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM C07. NO. PPM
STATE MOD
COMMENTS: Q3VI0US PASS.
11.
3.
s.
1.
6.
6.
11.
3.
0. 04
0. 06
0. 06
0. 01
0. 06
0. 05
0. 03
0. 06
377.
23
19
127
19
23
1002
20
30 MPH
IDLE-N
IDLE-N
2900 RPM
IDLE-N
IDLE-D
40 MPH
IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE
EMISSION RESULTS
HC, PPM 007. NO, PPM
LOD 2M0D
26.
0. 64
74.
30 MPH
20.
0. 43
IS.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
30.
0. 44
14.
IDLE-N
10.
0. 27
17.
2300 RPM
26.
0. 42
19.
IDLE—N
36.
0. 73
36.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
21.
0. 63
102.
40 MPH
11.
0. 40
IS.
IDLE-N
COMHENTS: OBVIOUS PASS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO
YEAR
MAKE CID TYPE
HC. PPM
cor.
NO. PPM
1 6093
1976
OLDS 350 LOD 2M0D
39.
0. 03
118. 30 MPH
451.
1. 66
20. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
600.
0. 98
15. IDLE-N
107.
0. 06
61. 2500 RPM
405.
2. 01
19. IDLE-N
307.
2. 60
17. IDLE-D
STATE MOD
35.
0. 04
221. 40 MPH
432.
1. 59
IS. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
2 6053 1976 OLDS 350 STATE MOD
COMMENTS: FAILED HC AND CO.
HC.PPM
65.
710.
cov.
0. 09
3. 76
NO. PPM
482. 40 MPH
0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 68-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING Or TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPG
3 6053 1976 OLDS 330 1975 FTP 2.21 13.49 564.04 1.59 14.79
HWY FET 0.26 0.38 463.80 1.37 19.03
HC,PPM
C07.
NO. PPM
50 CRUIS
11.
0. 01
147.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
19.
0. 02
88.
30 MPH
510.
0. 78
19.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
539.
0. 35
14.
IDLE-N
34.
0. 01
63.
2500 RPM
421.
1. 38
17.
IDLE—N
280.
1. 95
19.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
7.
0. 02
215.
40 MPH
407.
1. 06
13.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
1070.
0. 39
13.
IDLE-N
162.
0. 01
64.
2500 RPM
1001.
0. 48
13.
IDLE—N
1010.
0. 50
15.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS
4 6033 1976 OLDS 350 STATE MOD
COMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
HC,PPM
13.
31.
C07.
0. 02
0. 02
NO, PPM
492. 40 MPH
0. IDLE-N
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTINO PROGRAM - 63-03-2871 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF test RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH FTP,HFET IN GMS/MI
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC CO C02 NOXC MPQ
3 6033 1976 OLDS 330 1975 FTP 1.09 3.42 617.97 1.43 14 a,
HWY FET 0. 12 0. 00 482. 70 1. 59 13. 34,
HC.PPM
C07.
NO. PPM
SO CRUIS
3.
0. 02
144.
50 MPH
LOD 2M0D
IS.
0. 02
95.
30 MPH
123.
0. 02
74.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
3.
0. 02
53.
IDLE-N
14.
0. 02
60.
2300 RPM
3.
0. 02
83.
IDLE-N
10.
0. 02
193.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
9.
0. 02
246.
40 MPH
110.
0. 01
81.
IDLE-N
4SPD DIS
2.
0. 02
82.
IDLE-N
1.
0. 03
83.
2300 RPM
0.
0. 03
123.
IDLE-N
1.
0. 02
132.
IDLE-D
COMMENTS: LIMITER CAP MIS.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 6S-03-2S71 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST — EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM COX NO. PPM
1 SO54 1973 PONT 131 LOO 2M0D 61. 0.36 36. 30 MPH
43. 0. 37 0. IDLE-N
4SPD IDL 69. 0. 99 4. IDLE-N
40. 0. 76 31. 2300 RPM
49. 0. 57 3. IDLE-N
34. 0. 68 4. IDLE-D
STATE MOD 46. 0. 34 41. 40 MPH
57. 0. 47 3. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
HC, PPM C07. NO. PPM
2 3054 1978 PONT 151 STATE MOD 83. 0.69 142. 40 MPH
36. 0. 58 0. IDLE-N
COMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
-------
AUTOMOTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
EPA TESTING PROGRAM - 63-03-2371 TASK 2
FINAL LISTING OF TEST RESULTS
LOS ANGELES
TESTED THIS MONTH
TEST VEH MODEL TEST EMISSION RESULTS
NO NO YEAR MAKE CID TYPE HC, PPM CO*/. NO, PPM
1 6039 1976 DATS 83 LOD 2M0D
COMMENTS: FAILED CO.
67.
0. 13
1139. 30 MPH
26.
0.
69
24.
IDLE-N
4SPD IDL
47.
0.
97
13.
IDLE-N
16.
0.
18
72.
2300 RPM
23.
0.
78
17.
IDLE-N
0.
0.
00
0.
IDLE-D
STATE MOD
39.
0.
12
1231.
40 MPH
14.
0.
64
23.
IDLE-N
2 6033 1976 DATS
COMMENTS: PASS HC AND CO.
HC,PPM
83 STATE MOD 115.
21.
CO*/. NO, PPM
0. 23 2431. 40 MPH
0. 37 0. IDLE-N
------- |