SwRI 08-4855-150
DYNAMOMETER TESTING OF NONROAD DIESEL
ENGINES TO SUPPORT NONROAD REGULATIONS
Prepared by
Michael J. Smith
Department of Emissions Research
Automotive Products and Emissions Research Division
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas
FINAL REPORT
Prepared for
Sierra Research
1521 I Street
Sacramento, California 95814
June 1992
fi
OUTHWEST
AN A N TO N I O
ETRO IT
RESEARCH
WAS
INSTITUTE
HOUSTON
I N GTO N, DC
-------
SwRI 08-4855-150
DYNAMOMETER TESTING OF NONROAD DIESEL
ENGINES TO SUPPORT NONROAD REGULATIONS
Prepared by
Michael J. Smith
Department of Emissions Research
Automotive Products and Emissions Research Division
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas
FINAL REPORT
Prepared for
Sierra Research
1521 I Street
Sacramento, California 95814
June 1992
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
SANANTONIO HOUSTON
DETROIT WASHINGTON, DC
-------
ytosr-%
f A \
\m'j
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105
OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION
March 31,1993
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Southwest Research Institute Report"Dynamometer Testing of Nonroad Diesel Engines to
Support Nonroad Regulations: SwRI 08-4855-150", June, 1992.
TO: R. Maxwell, Director
Certification Division
FROM: M. Sabourin, Chief^T)']
Engg. & Technical Resources Brancn
Attached is the Final Report for a test program funded by EPA under contract number 68-C1-0079. This
report presents only factual emission data and noncontroversial conclusions. This report will be placed in
Docket No. A-91 -24 as a draft report for public review and comment. For these reasons your concurrence
is requested to waive administrative review according to the policy outlined in the directive of April 22,1982
Concurrence
.^Serft Jfiaxwell, Director
Certification Division
Attachment
-------
FOREWORD
This project was performed for Sierra Research by the Department of Emissions
Research, Automotive Products and Emissions Research Division, Southwest Research
Institute. The statement of work, Work Assignment 05, Contract 68-C1-0079, was issued
by EPA on December 19, 1991. It was titled, "Dynamometer Testing of Nonroad Diesel
Engines to Support Nonroad Regulations." SwRI's revised response to the Work
Assignment was submitted to Sierra Research on February 7, 1992. Test work began in
April 1992 and was completed in May 1992.
The work assignment project officer was Mr. Tom Snyder of the U.S. EPA Motor
Vehicle and Fuels Emissions Laboratory, Certification Division. Project funding was
provided to SwRI by Sierra Research. The Principal Investigator for SwRI was Michael J.
Smith, Engineer, Department of Emissions Research. Project Manager for SwRI Project No.
08-4855 was Mr. Jeff J. White, Manager of Certification, Audit, and Compliance.
ii
-------
TABLE OP CONTENTS
FOREWORD ii
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF TABLES v
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. TECHNICAL APPROACH 2
2.1 Selection of Nonroad Engines for Testing 2
2.2 Transient Tests 2
2.3 8-Mode Steady State Test 5
2.4 Federal Smoke Test 5
2.5 CARB "Snap-Idle" Smoke Test 5
3. TEST RESULTS 8
3.1 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine 8
3.2 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine 8
4. SUMMARY 24
APPENDICES
A - CARB "SNAP-IDLE" SMOKE TEST INFORMATION
B - TRANSIENT TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D NONROAD
ENGINE
C - TRANSIENT TEOM FIGURES FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D NONROAD
ENGINE
D - EIGHT-MODE STEADY-STATE TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D
NONROAD ENGINE
E - TRANSIENT TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D NONROAD
ENGINE
F - TRANSIENT TEOM FIGURES FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D NONROAD
ENGINE
G- EIGHT-MODE STEADY-STATE RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D
NONROAD ENGINE
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Diesel Engine Before Installation
in SwRI Transient Test Cell 4 4
2 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Diesel Engine Before Installation
in SwRI Transient Test Cell 4 4
iv
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Test Engine Specifications 3
2 Diesel Fuel Analysis and CFR Specifications 6
3 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #1
Emissions Results 9
4 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #2
Emissions Results 10
5 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #3
Emissions Results 11
6 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #4
Emissions Results 12
7 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Emissions Results 13
8 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Emissions Results 14
9 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Smoke Test Results 15
10 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #1
Emissions Results 16
11 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine Transient Sequence #2
Emissions Results 17
12 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine 8-Mode Steady-State #1
Emissions Results 18
13 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine 8-Mode Steady-State #2
Emissions Results 19
14 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine Smoke Test Results 20
15 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine Results Summary 22
16 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine Results Summary 23
17 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Transient/8-Mode Comparison 24
18 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Transient/8-Mode Comparison 25
v
-------
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
°BTDC
degrees before top-dead-center
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CFR
Code of Federal Regulations
CO
carbon monoxide
co2
carbon dioxide
CVS
constant volume sampler
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
op
degrees Fahrenheit
HC
hydrocarbons
hp
horsepower
hr
hour
in.3
cubic inches
L
liter
NOx
oxides of nitrogen
SwRI
Southwest Research Institute
vi
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report contains emission test results from two 1991 model year nonroad diesel
engines. Two 80 hp John Deere engines were tested, where one was a 4039D (3.9L)
production unit and the other was a similar 4045D (4.5L) engine modified to meet proposed
CARB standards for nonroad engines. Emission testing included EPA transient emission
tests, 8-mode steady-state tests, Federal smoke tests, and a CARB "Snap-Idle" smoke test.
Each engine was tested for regulated emissions of HC, CO, NOx, particulate, and smoke.
Repeat tests were performed for all engine emission tests, with the exception of the "Snap-
Idle" smoke test, which was performed once per engine. A summary of the average test
results is given below in Table ES-1.
TABLE ES-1. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR JOHN DEERE ENGINES
John Deere 4039D Nonroad Engine
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(g/hp-hr)
Particulate
(g/hp-hr)
FTP Transient
1.4
3.4
7.4
0.62
8-Mode Steady-State
0.6
3.5
7.2
0.59
Acceleration Lug Peak
Federal Smoke: 12% 23% 24%
CARB "Snap-Idle" Peak Smoke = 17%
.Tnhn Dptfre 4Q45D Nonroad Engine
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(g/hp-hr)
Particulate
(g/hp-hr)
FTP Transient
1.7
2.1
7.1
0.59
8-Mode Steady-State
0.9
1.5
6.1
0.38
Acceleration Lug Peak
Federal Smoke: 3% 4% 4%
CARB "Snap-Idle" Peak Smoke = 6%
vii
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
As directed by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, EPA is studying the
contribution of nonroad sources to the emissions inventory in non-attainment areas.
Preliminary studies indicate that, at a minimum, NOx emissions from nonroad diesel
engines may warrant controls. EPA is exploring the viability of adopting existing steady-
state emission test procedures as an interim step toward controls for nonroad diesel
engines.
This work assignment focused on performing on-road transient and 8-mode steady-
state tests on two different 1991 model year 80 hp nonroad diesel engines. Results from
this work will be used by EPA to aid in determining what levels of interim emission
standards are feasible using a test procedure based on the ISO 8178 8-mode steady-state
test cycle.
1
-------
2. TECHNICAL APPROACH
2.1 Selection of Nonroad Engines for Testing
EPA selected two nonroad 80 hp diesel engines. One is a production 1991 model
year nonroad engine and the other is a similar engine modified to meet the proposed CARB
standards for nonroad engines. EPA's technical advisor for this work assignment had final
approval of the engines to be tested. SwRI arranged with the manufacturer to take delivery
of the approved engines.
Table 1 summarizes test engine specifications that were selected by EPA for this
study. The 1991 model year John Deere 4039D nonroad diesel engine used in this program
was a naturally aspirated, in-line, 4-cylinder configuration with 3.9 L displacement. Rated
speed for the engine was 2,200 rpm. The engine had a rated power output of 72 bhp, as
well as a peak torque and peak torque speed of 200 ft-lb and 1300 rpm, respectively. The
fuel injection timing for the engine was 15°BTDC. Note that the fuel injection timing data
was supplied by John Deere and was not confirmed by SwRI.
The second of the two engines used in this test program was a John Deere 4045D
nonroad diesel. This 4.5L engine was based on the production 3.9L unit, and included
modifications made by Deere in an attempt to satisfy proposed CARB nonroad standards.
The engine was also a naturally-aspirated, in-line, 4-cylinder, with a power output of 73
bhp at 2200 rpm. The peak torque and peak torque speeds for the 4.5L engine were 212 ft-
lbs and 1300 rpm, respectively, and the fuel injection timing was 8°BTDC. Again, the fuel
injection timing data was supplied by John Deere and was not confirmed by SwRI.
22, Transient Tests
Two EPA on-highway transient test sequences per engine were conducted. A test
sequence consisted of one cold-start transient test plus two consecutive hot-start transient
tests (sequence = 1 cold + 2 hot). SwRI collected all gaseous emissions (HC, CO, and NOx)
on a "segment by segment" basis for the 4-bag test. Particulate matter (PM) emissions were
collected using a single filter set for each transient test. The first hot-start transient test
was used in determining composite results, but not the second one. Transient emissions
tests were performed following procedures given 40 CFR 86, Subpart N for heavy-duty
diesel emissions measurement. All emissions instrumentation was maintained, calibrated,
and operated as specified in 40 CFR.
Continuous particulate matter measurement using a tapered element oscillating
microbalance (TEOM) was used to compute a "4-bag" particulate breakdown. Because
TEOM data does not equate exactly to particulate matter collected on a single filter set, the
"bag" or "modal" TEOM data was used to proportion the transient test PM emission among
the individual "bags" or "modes" of transient operation.
The John Deere 4039D and 4045D engines were installed and tested in Department
of Emissions Research Test Cell 4, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. Test Cell 4 is equipped
and calibrated to perform EPA transient cycle emissions testing. The test fuel used for
2
-------
TABLE 1. TEST ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS
Manufacturer
John Deere Engine Works
Model
4039D
4045D
Use
Nonroad
Nonroad
Engine Serial Number
4039DF001359939
4045DF001358031
Model Year
1991
1991
Rated Power (bhp)
72
73
Rated Speed (rpm)
2,200
2,200
Peak Torque (ft-lbf)
200
212
Peak Torque Speed (rpm)
1,300
1,300
Injection Timing (°BTDC)
15
8
Cylinder Configuration
I-4
i-4
Bore x Stroke (in)
4.19x4.33
4.19 x 5.00
Displacement (in3 - {)
239 (3.9)
276 (4.5)
Aspiration
Natural
Natural
Aftercooling
none
none
3
-------
FIGURE 1. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) DIESEL ENGINE
BEFORE INSTALLATION IN SWRI TRANSIENT TEST CELL 4
4
-------
this test program, referred to as SwRI fuel code EM-1392-F, was a Phillips Petroleum
ASTM 2-D emissions grade fuel with the sulfur level doped to 0.25 percent to approximate
typical off-road fuel. Pertinent fuel properties of fuel EM-1392-F are given in Table 2.
2.3 8-Mode Steady State Test
SwRI performed two (2) 8-mode steady state emissions tests per engine. The
particular 8-mode test cycle used in this work was similar to the ISO 8178 8-mode cycle,
with the exception of mode sampling times. Following preliminary steady-state testing of
the 4039D (3.9L) engine in which several of the individual modes were previewed, it was
noted that the engine produced a wide range of 90 mm filter loadings. After conversations
with Mr. Tom Synder, explaining the engine's behavior, a plan was approved which called
for establishing a 90 mm flowrate to optimize filter loading for Mode No. 1 (rated speed, full
load) using 10 minutes of sampling time. This flowrate was then used for the remaining
steady-state modes, with the options of extending the 10-minute sampling interval to 20
minutes in the event of light filter loadings, or abbreviating the interval in the case of
heavy filter loadings. This test procedure was then utilized for both of the engines.
Gaseous emissions (HC, CO, and NOx) and particulate matter were measured for each
mode singly, then a composite brake-specific emission rate was computed using assigned
weighting factors. All emissions measurements used dilute, full-flow, CVS sampling
techniques.
2.4 Federal Smoke Test
Two Federal smoke tests were performed on each engine. Smoke emissions were
measured by using a PHS end-of-stack smokemeter as specified in 40 CFR Subpart I -
"Emission Regulations for New Diesel Heavy-Duty Engines; Smoke Exhaust Test
Procedure."
2.5 CARB "Snap-Idle" Smoke Test
In addition to the Federal Smoke tests, an additional "Snap-Idle" smoke test also
was performed on each of the engines. The "Snap-Idle" smoke test is part of CARB's heavy-
duty vehicle smoke and tampering inspection program. This test is a roadside inspection
that uses electronic instruments to measure smoke in order to detect excessive smoke
emissions from both intrastate and interstate heavy-duty vehicles. Details of the test
procedure are included in Attachment A.
The roadside Snap-Idle test consists of rapid and repeated engine accelerations
(snaps), from curb-idle speed to maximum governor speed, on an unloaded, fully-warmed
engine. In the field, the transmission is unloaded and the drive wheels chocked for safety.
Three "clean-out" snaps are performed, then three more snaps are run for record. The test
monitors smoke opacity, and the average of the two peak readings with the least difference
in opacity values is used to determine compliance. In the event that all three readings have
euivalent differences between them, the result is the average of the three readings. CARB
smoke standards for 1991 limit this average peak opacity to 40 percent for 1991 and newer
5
-------
TABLE 2. DIESEL FUEL ANALYSIS AND CFR SPECIFICATIONS
FUEL TYPE 1-D 2-D X SUPPLIER PHILLIPS
LOT NO. R-382 SwRI CODE EM-1392-F
CFR Specification8
Item
ASTM
Type 1-D
Type 2-D
Supplier
Analysis
SwRI
Analyses
Cetane Number
D613
48-54
42-50
45.0
43.8
Distillation Range:
IBP°F
10% Point, °F
50% Point, °F
90% Point, °F
EP, °F
D86
D86
D86
D86
D86
330-390
370-430
410-480
460-520
500-560
340-400
400-460
470-540
550-610
580-660
382
456
521
591
630
383
451
516
592
628
Gravity, API
D287
40-44
33-37
35.0
35.0
Total Sulfur, %
D129 or D2622
0.05-0.20
0.20-0.50
.090
0.25
Hydrocarbon Composition:
Aromatics, %
Paraffins, Naphthenes,
Olefins
D1319
D1319
8b
C
27b
C
41.7
58.3
42.3
57.7
Flashpoint, °F (min.)
D93
120
130
166
168
Viscosity, Centistokes
D445
1.6-2.0
2.0-3.2
3.30
2.84
aDiesel fuel specification as in CFR 86.113-90(b)(2) lor light-duty diesel vehicles and CFR 86.1313-
90(b)(2) for heavy-duty diesel engines.
^Minimum
cRemainder
Supplier Analyses SwRI Analyses
Date: 10/21/91 by: M. Gillespie
Date: 12/6/91
6
-------
model year engine families. For 1990 model year and older engine families, the limit is 55
percent. There are provisions for exemptions if manufacturers demonstrate that their
engine cannot meet these standards when operating properly. After 1991, the proposed
smoke standards limit the average peak opacity to 40 percent for 1974 and newer model-
year engine families, and 55 percent for 1973 and older model-year engine families.
For this program, Snap-Idle tests were performed after the Federal Smoke tests
were complete. When the engine had been fully warmed using the test cell dynamometer,
the drive coupling between the engine flywheel and the dynamometer was removed. This
de-coupling procedure was followed because of concern that the inertia of the large electric
dynamometer would be much greater than for actual roadside test conditions. However,
inertial and parasitic loads not simulated in this laboratory setting include rotating masses
of the power steering pump, air compressor, air conditioning compressor, fan horsepower,
etc. Once the engine-to-dynamometer drive coupling was removed, the electric starter
motor mounted on the engine was used to start the engine, and the Snap-Idle teats were
performed.
7
-------
3. TEST RESULTS
The results of the emission tests performed are summarized in Tables 3 through 14.
Attachments B through G contain emission data sheets for each of the individual tests
performed, figures displaying TEOM data collected during the transient tests, and engine
performance sheets recorded during the 8-mode steady-state tests. Original charts for
continuous HC and NOx and other detailed documentation will be kept on file by SwRI for
three years.
3.1 John Deere 4039D (3.9L) Nonroad Engine
As the result of a file storage error, TEOM data could not be retrieved following the
first pair of 3.9L transient test sequences. Therefore, a second set of transient test
sequences was performed complete with TEOM continuous particulate matter measurement
data. Transient test results for the John Deere 4039D engine are given in Tables 3 through
6. The 8-mode steady-state test results are given in Tables 6 and 7. These tables are
broken down into four groups, with the first grouping of data identifying the actual test
modes and mode weighting factors used in computing the mode-weighted composite brake
specific emissions at the bottom of each table. Other groupings of data include a mass
emission rate in grams/hour for each mode, a fuel specific emission result at each mode in
grams/pound of fuel consumed, and finally the brake specific emission rate at each mode in
grams/horsepower-hour.
3.2 John Deere 4045D (4.5L) Nonroad Engine
Transient test results for the John Deere 4045D engine are given in Tables 7 and 8.
The 8-mode steady-state results are displayed in Tables 9 and 10, presented in a manner
consistent with the previous 4039D steady-state data.
8
-------
TABLE 3. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #1
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(q/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-3.9-TC3
Bag #1
2.3
10.3
10.0
N/A
0.71
Bag #2
2.5
5.6
8.7
N/A
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
2.0
7.0
N/A
2.73
Bag #4
2.0
6.3
9.0
N/A
0.67
Total
1.6
4.4
8.0
0.77
5.05
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-3.9-TH2
Bag #1
1.6
5.0
9.3
N/A
0.65
Bag #2
2.2
3.6
8.4
N/A
0.93
Bag #3
1.0
1.6
7.2
N/A
2.72
Bag #4
2.0
3.9
8.9
N/A
0.66
Total
1.4
2.7
7.9
0.51
4.96
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-3.9-TH3
Bag #1
1.6
4.4
8.7
N/A
0.66
Bag #2
1.9
4.5
8.2
N/A
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
1.8
7.0
N/A
2.73
Bag #4
1.8
4.2
9.0
N/A
0.65
Total
1.3
2.8
7.7
0.51
4.98
Sequence Composite Results
Composite | t.5
3.0
8.0
&$$
4.97
Notes. Test Date = 05-01-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6/7 (Hot 1)
9
-------
TABLE 4. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #2
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(q/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-3.9-TC4
Bag #1
2.2
9.5
10.2
N/A
0.71
Bag #2
2.5
4.8
8.8
N/A
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
2.0
7.1
N/A
2.70
Bag #4
2.1
6.2
8.9
N/A
0.68
Total
1.6
4.2
8.1
1.02
5.03
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-3.9-TH4
Bag #1
1.7
5.5
8.7
N/A
0.66
Bag #2
2.2
4.0
8.0
N/A
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
1.6
6.8
N/A
2.73
Bag #4
2.0
3.9
8.6
N/A
0.67
Total
1.4
2.9
7.5
0.57
5.00
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-3.9-TH5
Bag #1
1.8
3.5
8.8
N/A
0.66
Bag #2
2.3
3.4
8.5
N/A
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
1.7
7.2
N/A
2.73
Bag #4
2.2
3.4
9.0
N/A
0.66
Total
1.5
23
7.9
0.49
4.99
Sequence Composite Results
Composite
13
3.1
7.$
0.63
5.00
Notes: Test Date = 05-04-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6/7 (Hot 1)
10
-------
TABLE 5. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #3
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(a/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-3.9-TC6
Bag #1
2.0
10.3
9.2
1.44
0.71
Bag #2
2.2
4.5
8.4
1.14
0.94
Bag #3
0.9
1.9
6.8
0.49
2.74
Bag #4
1.6
6.4
8.1
1.08
0.71
Total
1.4
4.2
7.6
0.83
5.10
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-3.9-TH8
Bag #1
1.5
6.8
8.1
0.95
0.70
Bag #2
1.9
3.8
7.9
0.71
0.95
Bag #3
0.9
1.7
6.7
0.39
2.74
Bag #4
1.9
4.8
8.3
0.78
0.69
Total
1.3
3.2
7.3
0.58
5.08
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-3.9-TH9
Bag #1
1.6
3.6
8.3
0.58
0.67
Bag #2
2.0
4.0
8.0
0.57
0.95
Bag #3
0.9
1.9
6.8
0.39
2.74
Bag #4
1.9
3.0
8.3
0.55
0.68
Total
1.4
2.7
7.4
0.47
5.04
Sequence Composite Results
Composite,
53
3.4
7.4
0.02
5.06
Noisj: Test Date = 05-12-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6/7 (Hot 1)
11
-------
TABLE 6. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #4
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(g/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-3.9-TC7
Bag #1
2.2
11.1
10.6
1.47
0.70
Bag #2
2.3
4.8
9.3
0.94
0.94
Bag #3
1.0
1.8
7.7
0.52
2.73
Bag #4
2.0
5.5
9.7
0.90
0.70
Total
1.5
4.2
8.7
0.78
5.08
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-3.9-TH10
Bag #1
1.6
6.7
8.0
0.85
0.69
Bag #2
2.0
4.0
7.9
0.72
0.95
Bag #3
0.9
1.7
6.7
0.42
2.73
Bag #4
1.9
4.9
8.3
0.81
0.69
Total
1.4
3.3
7.3
0.59
5.06
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-3.9-TH 11
Bag #1
1.6
4.9
8.1
0.75
0.68
Bag #2
2.1
3.9
7.9
0.63
0.94
Bag #3
0.9
1.7
6.7
0.41
2.74
Bag #4
1.9
3.5
8.3
0.64
0.68
Total
1.4
2.8
7.3
0.53
5.04
Sequence Composite Results
Compostte
t.4
$.4
7.5
0.62
5.06
Notes' Test Date = 05-13-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6P (Hot 1)
12
-------
TABLE 7. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE 8-MODE STEADY-STATE #1
EMISSION RESULTS
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 3 9L Off-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft-lb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2.200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
210
52
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
158
39
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
105
26
a
Idle
0
15%
850
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
NC
CO
NGx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
g/hr
g/hr
q/hr
a/hr
1
75
24.6
14 22
86.08
637 45
24.10
2
56
19.2
27.79
30.80
356 67
9.90
3
33
154
27 07
49.64
198.43
8 67
4
7
68
59.88
91.48
53 87
7.34
5
52
19 9
9 38
898.78
383.47
125.90
6
33
13.7
20.77
21.62
279 74
11 69
7
26
9.6
21 50
20.65
153.90
7 14
B
0
1 3
12.71
14 25
20.83
1 99
ModB g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
MOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
q/lb
q/lb
q/lb
q/lb
1
75
NA
0 58
3.50
25.92
0 98
2
56
NA
1 45
1 60
18.53
0 52
3
33
NA
1 75
3 21
12.84
0 56
4
7
NA
8 76
13.38
7 88
1 07
5
52
NA
0 47
45.20
19.28
6.33
6
33
NA
1 51
1 57
20.36
0.85
7
26
NA
2.23
2.14
15.98
0.74
8
0
NA
9 42
10.56
15.43
1 48
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
1
75
0 329
0.19
1 15
8.55
0.32
2
56
0 345
0.50
0 55
6 41
0 18
3
33
0 406
0 71
1 31
5.22
0 23
4
7
0 954
8.35
12.76
7 51
1 02
5
52
0.383
0.18
17 36
7 41
2 43
6
33
0 363
0.55
0.57
7 37
0 31
7
26
0 370
0 83
0.79
5.92
0 27
a
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
lb/hp- ftr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr i
8-Mode
Weighted
0 376
0 62
3 47
7 17
0 5841
13
-------
TABLE 8. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE 8-MODE STEADY-STATE #2
EMISSION RESULTS
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 3 9L Off-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft—lb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2.200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
210
52
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
158
39
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
105
26
8
Idle
0
15%
850
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
g/hr
g/hr
g/hr
g/hr
t
74
25.2
16.38
117 77
633 16
25 22
2
57
20 9
25 93
39 67
380.03
11 43
3
36
14 9
29 00
52 45
197 11
6 99
4
7
6 9
66.55
98 77
53.31
8 60
5
52
19 7
9 51
851 67
394 99
121 73
6
38
13 9
20 18
20 77
282 99
14 41
7
26
9 8
21 02
22.66
155 63
9 04
a
0
1 4
13 18
13.69
23.11
1 96
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
g/lb
g/lb
g/lb
g/lb
1
74
NA
0 65
4 67
25.13
1 00
2
57
NA
1 24
1 89
18 15
0 55
3
36
NA
1 94
3 52
1322
0 47
4
7
NA
9 65
14 31
7 73
1 25
5
52
NA
0 48
43 20
20.04
6 17
6
38
NA
1 46
1 50
20.42
1 04
7
26
NA
2 14
2 30
15 82
0 92
8
0
NA
9 15
9 51
16 05
1 36
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
1
74
0 339
022
1 58
8.51
0 34
2
57
0 3G8
0 46
0 70
6 67
0 20
3
36
0 410
0 80
1 44
5 41
0 19
4
7
0 923
8 91
13 22
7 14
1 15
5
52
0 383
0 18
16 51
7 65
2 36
6
38
0 362
0 53
0 54
7 39
0 38
7
26
0 377
0.81
0 87
5 97
0 35
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr i
8-Mode
i
Weighted
0 384
0 65
3 54
7 30
0 5921
14
-------
TABLE 9. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE SMOKE TEST RESULTS
Federal Smoke Test
Acceleration
Lugging
Peak
(A)
(B)
(C)
Test #1
11.6%
23.1 %
23.6 %
Test #2
12.0%
22.2 %
24.1 %
Average
11,9%
C
CARB "Snap-Idle" Smoke Testa
Test #1
16.7%
Note: All results are percent opacity.
a - Peak opacity.
15
-------
TABLE 10. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #1
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(q/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-4.5-TC2
Bag #1
2.2
5.4
10.3
1.47
0.65
Bag #2
2.4
3.5
8.3
1.05
0.92
Bag #3
1.2
1.5
6.3
0.43
2.76
Bag #4
2.6
2.2
8.9
0.73
0.66
Total
1.7
2.6
7.5
0.72
4.99
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-4.5-TH1
Bag #1
2.3
2.8
8.6
0.81
0.64
Bag #2
2.4
2.6
7.7
0.69
0.91
Bag #3
1.2
1.4
6.0
0.38
2.77
Bag #4
2.7
2.5
8.8
0.71
0.63
Total
1.7
2.0
7.1
0.52
4.99
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-4.5-TH2
Bag #1
2.3
2.8
8.6
0.81
0.64
Bag #2
2.4
2.6
7.7
0.69
0.91
Bag #3
1.2
1.4
6.0
0.38
2.77
Bag #4
2.7
2.5
8.8
0.71
0.63
Total
1.7
2.0
7.0
0.53
4.95
Sequence Composite Results
Composite
t.7
2.1
7.2
0.55
4.99
Notes. Test Date = 05-21-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6/7 (Hot 1)
16
-------
TABLE 11. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #2
EMISSIONS RESULTS
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOx
(q/hp-hr)
Part,
(g/hp-hr)
Cycle
Work
(hp-hr)
Cold Start: Test Code JD-4.5-TC4
Bag #1
2.5
5.1
9.5
1.83
0.66
Bag #2
2.5
3.4
8.1
1.17
0.92
Bag #3
1.2
1.5
6.2
0.45
2.77
Bag #4
2.7
2.4
8.9
0.83
0.65
Total
1.8
2.5
7.3
0.81
5.00
Hot Start #1: Test Code JD-4.5-TH4
Bag #1
2.1
3.0
8.5
1.07
0.64
Bag #2
2.3
2.7
7.6
0.70
0.91
Bag #3
1.2
1.5
5.9
0.38
2.78
Bag #4
2.7
2.7
8.7
0.87
0.65
Total
1.7
2.1
6.9
0.59
4.98
Hot Start #2: Test Code JD-4.5-TH5
Bag #1
2.2
2.4
8.3
1.15
0.65
Bag #2
2.5
2.4
7.5
0.75
0.92
Bag #3
1.2
1.4
5.9
0.45
2.77
Bag #4
2.9
2.6
8.6
1.15
0.64
Total
1.8
1.9
6.9
0.69
4.98
Sequence Composite Results
Composite
t,7
2.1
?.o
0.$2
4.$8
Notes- Test Date = 05-25-92
Sequence Composite = 1/7 (Cold) + 6/7 (Hot 1)
17
-------
TABLE 12. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE 8-MODE STEADY-STATE #1
EMISSION RESULTS
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 4 5L Off-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft—lb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
220
54
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
165
41
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
110
27
8
Idle
0
15%
770
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
q/hr
q/hr
q/hr
q/hr
1
75
26.2
31.16
136.74
388.51
29.31
2
56
20.6
42.43
65.61
288.17
14 89
3
33
162
45.34
84 18
207 70
14 57
4
3
75
62.22
88.14
95.91
10 91
5
54
18.5
24 22
40.17
399 33
32.09
6
41
13.8
24 41
19.67
283.48
6.67
7
27
10.0
27.42
27 40
184 53
6 91
6
0
1 5
21.55
13.56
18.64
4 90
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
q/lb
q/lb
g/lb
q/lb
1
75
NA
1.19
5.23
14 85
1 12
2
56
NA
2.06
3 19
13.96
0 72
3
38
NA
2.84
5.21
12.85
0 90
4
8
NA
8 30
11 75
12.79
1 46
5
54
NA
1 31
2.17
21 57
1 73
6
41
NA
1 77
1.43
20.54
0 48
7
27
NA
2.75
2.75
18.53
0 69
8
0
NA
14 37
9.04
12.43
3 26
Mode g/hp-hr
8SFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
75
0.349
0.42
1.82
5 18
0 39
2
56
0 372
0 76
1 18
5.19
0.27
3
38
0.424
1 20
2 21
5.44
0 38
4
8
0 966
8 01
11.35
12.34
1 40
5
54
0 343
0.45
0 74
7 37
0 59
6
41
0 338
0.60
0.48
6.95
0 16
7
27
0 366
1 01
1 00
6.77
0.25
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
!
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
i
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr I
j8-Mode
I
I
1 Weighted
0 382
0 91
1 63
6 05
0 3971
18
-------
TABLE 13. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE 8-MODE STEADY-STATE #2
EMISSION RESULTS
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 4 5L Off—Hiqhwav
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft—lb
SHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
220
54
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
165
41
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
110
27
8
Idle
0
15%
770
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
q/hr
q/hr
q/hr
q/hr
1
76
24.8
26.62
115.43
403.39
27.58
2
56
20.8
39.85
60.18
287.85
13.66
3
38
15.8
42.78
72.76
214 60
12.04
4
7
75
55.09
78.90
97.71
9.82
5
55
T 8.3
24.53
34.61
392.67
23.05
6
41
139
25.84
17.68
292.29
7.18
7
27
100
27.71
28.08
187 39
6 93
8
0
1 6
23.71
15.32
21.50
4 56
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
q/lb
q/lb
q/lb
g/lb
1
76
NA
1.07
4 65
16.24
111
2
56
NA
1 92
2.90
13.87
0 66
3
38
NA
2.71
4 61
13.60
0.76
4
7
NA
7 38
10.56
13 08
1 31
5
55
NA
1 34
1 89
21.41
1.53
6
41
NA
1.86
1 28
21.09
0.52
7
27
NA
2.78
2.82
18.82
0 70
8
0
NA
14 91
9.64
13.52
2.87
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
76
0.327
0.35
1.52
5.31
0 36
2
56
0.368
0.71
1.07
510
0 24
3
38
0 415
1 13
1.92
5.65
0 32
4
7
1 047
7.72
11.05
13.69
1 38
5
55
0.334
0.45
0 63
7 16
0 51
6
41
0.335
0.63
0.43
7.07
0 17
7
27
0 363
1.01
1.02
6.83
0 25
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
gjhp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
8-Mode
Weighted
0 373
0 86
1 44
6 11
0 3591
19
-------
TABLE 14. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE SMOKE TEST RESULTS
Federal Smoke Test
Acceleration
Lugging
Peak
(A)
(B)
(C)
Test #1
2.7 %
3.8 %
4.0 %
Test #2
2.9 %
3.9 %
4.1 %
Average
2.8 %
$.9%
4.1 %
CARB "Snap-Idle" Smoke Test3
Test #1
5.5 %
Note: All results are percent opacity.
a - Peak opacity.
20
-------
4. SUMMARY
Comparative emissions testing of the two Deere 80 hp nonroad engines under EPA
Work Assignment 05, Contract 68-C1-0079, SwRI subcontract 92-09, has been completed.
Project activity included duplicate EPA on-road transient testing and ISO 8178 8-mode,
steady-state testing as well as Federal and CARB "Snap-Idle" smoke tests. A complete
summary of the individual test results for each of the engines including transient 8-mode,
and smoke test activity is included in Tables 15 and 16.
The average weighted 8-mode results and differences relative to the average
transient composite results for the 4039D engine are listed in Table 17. In viewing the
table, it is apparent that with the exception of HC emissions (which displayed a difference
of -53 percent), the remaining regulated emissions of CO, NOx, and PM were relatively
consistent displaying differences of 4, -3, and -5 percent, respectively. A similar analysis of
the 4045D engine's transient and 8-mode data is displayed in Table 18. Again, a large
difference in HC emissions is noted between the two procedures. However, with differences
of -27, -14, and -36 percent for the remaining regulated emissions of CO, NOx, and PM,
respectively, the 4045D engine did not display the correlation between the two test
procedures that was present with its 4039D counterpart.
Finally, emissions improvements of the modified 4045D engine relative to the 4039D
production engine are displayed in the 8-mode results as a 36 and 16 percent reduction in
PM and NOx, respectively. However, while the modified 4045D engine is effective in
reducing emissions, the magnitude of the improvement is highly dependent on the test
procedure, as displayed in the less sensitive heavy-duty transient cycle results which show
only a 5 percent reduction in both PM and NOx
21
-------
TABLE 15. JOHN DEERE 4039D (3.9L) NONROAD ENGINE TEST RESULTS
CO
DO
TEST
DATE
TEST
MO
MAX
HP
EMISSIONS (G/HP-HR)
BSFC
LBW-KR
0-MOOE (G/HR)
SMOKE TEST%
SNAP-OLE SMOKE TEST*
REMARKS
esHc
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
BSHC
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
•A1
•ff
¦C"
•1"
¦3-
«su.r
5/1/92
JO—3 9-TC3
75
1 58
4 40
803
0 773
0519
NOTEOM
5/1/92
JD-3 9-TH2
75
1 44
2 74
7 93
0 510
0 457
NOTEOM
5/1/92
JD-3 9-TH3
75
1 34
2 78
771
0506
0 479
NOTEOM
5/1/32
JD-3 9-CH2
75
1 46
298
7 95
0 548
0466
NOTEOM
5/4/92
JD-3 9—TC4
75
1 61
4 18
809
1 019
0512
NOTEOM
5/4/92
JD-3 9-7H4
75
1 44
289
7 48
0 567
0 484
NOTEOM
5/4/92
JD-3 9-TH5
75
1 49
2 51
786
0 494
0 467
NOTEOM
5/4/se
JD-3 9-CH4
75
1 47
3 07
7 57
0 632
0 488
NO TEOM
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M1
75
0 19
1 15
855
0 320
0329
1422
86 08
637 45
24 10
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M2
56
050
0 55
641
0 180
0 345
27 79
30 80
356 67
990
5/6/92
JD-3 9—BM3
38
0 71
1 31
522
0 230
0 406
2707
49 64
198 43
8 67
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M4
7
8 35
12 76
751
1 020
0 954
59 88
91 48
53 87
734
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M5
52
0 18
1736
741
1 020
0383
938
898 78
383 47
125 90
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M6
38
0 55
0 57
7 37
0 310
0363
20 77
21 62
279 74
11 69
5/6/92
JD-3 9-8M7
26
083
0 79
592
0 270
0 370
2150
20 65
153 90
7 14
5/6/92
JD-3 9-BM8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
12 71
14 25
20 83
1 99
5/6/92
WTD RESULT
062
3 47
7 17
0584
0 376
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M21
74
022
1 58
8 51
0 340
0 339
1638
11777
633 16
25 22
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M22
57
0 46
0 70
6 67
0200
0368
25 93
39 67
380 03
11 43
5/7/92
JD-3 9-BM23
36
080
1 44
541
0 190
0 410
29 00
52 45
197 11
699
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M24
7
8 91
1322
7 14
1 150
0 923
68 55
98 77
53 31
860
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M25
52
0 18
16 51
7 65
2 360
0383
9 51
851 67
394 99
121 73
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M26
38
053
054
7 39
0380
0362
2018
20 77
282 99
1441
5/7/92
JD-3 9-8M27
26
0 81
0 87
5 97
0350
0 377
21 02
22 66
155 63
904
5/7/92
JD-3 9-BM28
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1318
13 69
23 11
1 96
5/7/92
WTD RESULT
065
354
730
0592
0384
5/12#2
JD-3 9-TC6
75
1 42
4 18
759
0 825
0 490
5/12/32
JD-3 9-TH8
75
1 30
3 21
7 32
0 581
0 468
5/12/92
JD-3 9-TH9R
75
1 36
266
7 41
0 472
0 463
5/12/92
JD-3 9-CH8
75
1 32
335
7 36
0 616
0 471
5/13/92
JD-3 9-TC7
75
1 52
4 19
866
0 783
0 497
5/13/92
JD-3 9-TH10
75
1 36
3 25
7 32
0 589
0 459
5/13#2
JD-3 9—TH11
75
1 37
2 76
733
0530
0 446
5/13/92
JD-3 9-CH11
75
1 38
3 39
751
0 617
0 464
5/14/92
JD-3 9-S1
11 8
23 1
23 6
5/14/92
JD-3 9-S2
12 0
23 2
24 1
5/14/92
JD-3 9-SI1
16 1
16 8
165
16 7
-------
TABLE 16. JOHN DEERE 4045D (4.5L) NONROAD ENGINE TEST RESULTS
CO
CO
TEST
DATE
TEST
NO
MAX
HP
EMISSIONS (Q/HP-HH)
BSFC
^B/HP-HR
fl-MOOE fG/HHI
SMOKE TEST*
SNAP- IDLE SMOKE TEST %
REMARKS
BSHC
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
BSHC
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
"A"
¦B"
¦c-
¦1-
*2"
T
RESULT
5/21/92
JD-45-TC2
77
1 72
2 57
7 52
0717
0 520
5/21/92
JD-4 5-TH1
77
1 65
1 97
709
0 525
0 466
5/21/92
JD-4 5-TH2
77
1 73
1 95
701
0532
0 467
5/21/92
JD-4 5-CH1
77
1 66
206
715
0 552
0 474
5/25/92
JD-4 5-TC4
77
1 79
2 45
731
0811
0 494
5/25/92
JD-4 5-TH4
77
1 66
208
6 93
0 593
0 475
5/25/92
JD-4 5-TH5
77
1 80
1 89
6 86
0 687
0 476
5/25/92
JD-4 5-CH4
77
1 70
213
6 99
0 625
0 479
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M1
75
0 42
1 82
518
0 391
0 349
31 16
136 74
388 51
29 31
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M2
56
0 76
1 16
519
0 268
0 372
42 43
65 81
28817
14 89
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M3
38
1 20
221
5 44
0 382
0 424
45 84
8418
207 70
14 57
5/26/92
JD-4 S-8M4
8
801
11 35
12 34
1 405
0 966
62 22
8814
95 91
1091
5/26/92
JD-4S-8M5
54
0 45
0 74
7 37
0 593
0 343
24 22
4017
399 33
32 09
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M6
41
060
0 48
6 95
0163
0 338
24 41
19 67
283 48
6 67
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M7
27
1 01
1 00
677
0 254
0 366
27 42
27 40
184 53
691
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M8
0
N A
N A
NA
N A
N A
21 55
1356
1864
4 90
5/26/92
WTD RESULT
091
1 63
6 05
0 397
0 382
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M21
76
0 35
1 52
531
0 363
0 327
26 62
11543
403 39
27 58
5/26/92
JD-4 5—8M22
56
0 71
1 07
510
0 242
0 368
39 85
6018
287 85
1366
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M23
38
1 13
1 92
5 65
0317
0 415
42 78
72 76
214 60
1204
5/26/92
JD-4 5—8M24
7
7 72
11 05
13 69
1 375
1 047
55 09
78 90
97 71
9 82
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M25
55
0 45
063
716
0 511
0334
24 53
34 61
392 67
28 05
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M26
41
063
0 43
7 07
0174
0 335
25 84
1768
292 29
718
5/26/92
JD-4 5-8M27
27
1 01
1 02
6 83
0 252
0363
27 71
28 08
187 39
6 93
5/26/92
JD-4 S-8M28
0
N A
N A
NA
N A
N A
23 71
15 32
21 50
456
5/26/92
WTD RESULT
0 86
1 44
611
0 359
0 373
5/28/92
JD-4 5-S1
27
38
40
5/28/92
JD-4 5-S2
29
39
4 1
5/28/92
JD-4 5-SI1
55
5 5
55
55
-------
TABLE 17. JOHN DEERE 4039D TRANSIENT/8—MODE COMPARISON
TEST
DATE
TEST
NO
MAPPED
HP
EMISSIONS (G/HP-HR)
BSFC
LB/HP-HR
BSHC
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
TRANSIENT TESTS
5/12/92
JD-3.9-CH8
75
1.32
3.35
7.36
0.616
0.471
5/13/92
JD—3.9-CH11
75
1.38
3.39
7.51
0.617
0.464
TRANSIENT AVERAGE
75
1.35
3.37
7.44
0.617
0.468
8-MODE TESTS
5/6/92
8-MODE #1
0.62
3.47
7.17
0.584
0.376
5/7/92
8-MODE#2
0.65
3.54
7.30
0.592
0.384
8-MODE AVERAGE
0.64
3.51
7.24
0.588
0.380
PERCENT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
TRANSIENT & 8-MODE AVERAGES
-53 4
-3
-5
-19
24
-------
TABLE 18. JOHN DEERE 4045D TRANSIENT/8 —MODE COMPARISON
TEST
TEST
MAPPED
EMISSIONS (G/HP-HR)
BSFC
DATE
NO.
HP
BSHC
BSCO
BSNOx
PM
LB/HP-HR
TRANSIENT TESTS
5/21/92
JD—4.5-CH1
77
1.66
2.06
7.15
0.552
0.474
5/25/92
JD-4.5-CH4
77
1.70
2.13
6.99
0.625
0.479
TRANSIENT AVERAGE
77
1.68
2.10
7.07
0.589
0.477
8-MODE TESTS
5/26/92
8-MODE#1
0.91
1.63
6.05
0.397
0.382
8-MODE#2
0.86
1.44
6.11
0.359
0.373
8-MODE AVERAGE
0.89
1.54
6.08
0.378
0.378
PERCENT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
-47
-27
-14
-36
-21
TRANSIENT & 8-MODE AVERAGES
25
-------
APPENDIX A
CARB "SNAP-IDLE" SMOKE TEST INFORMATION
-------
i CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
^—>——i_i^^^
Informational Package
Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Smoke and Tampering
Inspection Program
i
Date; May, 1991
-------
Contents
I. Informational Fact Sheet
II. Key Highlights
III. Background Information
IV. Health & Safety Code,
Section 44011.6
V. Smoke Diagnostic Information
-------
California Air Resources Board
Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Smoke and Tampering
Inspection Program
Informaaonal Fact Sheet
The California Air Resources Board (ARB) will be working cooperatively with die
California Highway Patrol (CHP) to enforce California's new Heavy-Duty Vehicie In-
spection Program. This program applies to both intrastate and interstate heavy-cuty
vehicles and allows the ARB to issue citations to vehicles failing smoke or tampering
inspections. Penalties up to SlfOO per day may be assessed agamst the venicie owner.
Penames may be waived if the engine is repaired promptly. Vehicles can be piacea "out-
of-service'' if repairs are not completed or if penalties are not paid. A TrnmrmiTw 5300
penalty will be assessed with each citation issued. This S300 ""Tmimm penalty is for
funding research programs on developing cleaner burning diesel fuels and cannot oe
waived (school buses are exempt from the S300 penalty). ARB will not issue citations
until later this summer. Until then, all heavy-duty vehicles will be inspected under a
"Pre- Enforcement Program". Veiricies which fail these inspections, will be issued a
letter of "Non-Compliance* asking that the vehicle be repaired voluntarily.
TO avotp possrni.F rmTTON.s do the following
¦ FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES
¦ DONTTAMPER WITH ENGINE AND EMISSION CONTROLS
COMMON CAUSES OF FTrFS.STVF SMOKF:
* Dirty Air Filters " Injector Pump Problems * Fouled Injectors
"Throttle Delay Problems "Governor Problems 'Fuel Problems
For more information contact Mr. Ramon Cabrera at (818) 450-6177 or Ms. Horten-
aa Manmez at (818) 450-6161 in Southern California; or Mr. Don Chermch at (916)
322-7620 or Ms. Sharon Johnson at (916) 322-8275 in Northern California: or wnte to:
Mr. John Kowalski. Branch Chief, Heavy-Duty Diesel Roadside Branch, California Air
Resources Board. 9528 Telstar Avenue, El Monte, California 91731.
-------
TO REDUCE HIGH DIESEL SMOKE LEVELS:
Maintain your vehicle in accordance with manufacturers recommended maintenance
schedules and repair procedures. Don't tamper with fuel settings. Use only replace-
ment parts which meet manufacturers' specifications. High quality repairs and parts
reduce fuel consumption, smoke problems, and downtime.
The following items are some of the more common causes of high smoke levels:
* Maladjusted no air prcanie (Cusmmt)
* Maladjusted AFRC (Cat/Navistar)
* Maladjusted fuel rack (DDC and othen)
* Defective or maladjusted poiflinuter (Mack)
* Defective AFC pi™y»- bellows (Cummins)
* Defective or malarijuflrd throttle delay (DDC)
* Restricted air filter
* Malarijti«f»w inj>winn tinim^
* Clogged, worn or mismatched injectors or
' Fuel injectioa pump repair required
* Wom or incorrect fuel inject or rocker arms and i*mVa» parts
* Maladjusted valve iash * Defective or Maladjusted governor
" Low air box pressure
* Air rnamMri
* Kfalfrrnrrirminj rnrhrA anrj 3ftTHTTKTIfTt
" Poor fuel quality
* Improper driving gear
-------
State of California
Air Resources Board
Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Smoke and Tampering
Inspection Program
Key Highlights
Heayy-Duty
Vehicle Inspection Program
¦ Purpose of the Program
; • To Improve Air Quality
• Address Public Concern Over Smoking Vehicles
• To Fulfill Mandates of Senate Bill 1997
; Goal of the Program
: * Reduce Excessive Smoke Emissions and Tampering
from Heavy-Duty Diesei & Gas Powered Vehicles
• Out-of-State Vehicles Included
-------
Health and Safety Code
Section 44011.6 (Mandated by SB 1997)
, Mandated Requirements-.
* Set-uq Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee
(Industry - Government)
i
; • Develop Test Procedure to Detect Excessive Smoke
i
• Develop Inspection Procedures for Emission Controls
'< • Required Penalty Structure
i
- Possible Penalties up to $1500 Per Oay
- S300 Additional Penalty Per Citation
- CHP Authority to Place Vehicles Out-of-Service
- Develop Hearing Procedure
Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee
* Air Resources Board (ARB)
; * Department of California Highway Patrol (CHP)
; • California Trucking Association (CTA)
i
i
: • Engine Manufacturer's Association (EMA)
i
I • South Coast Air Quaiity
Management District (SCAQMD)
-------
Development Efforts
Pilot Programs - March '89 thru Fall '90
* Data Collection for Program Development
Pre-Enforcement Program - Ongoing
* Famiiarize Trucking Industry with Inspection
Program
* No Citations will be issued Until Summer
1991
Highlights of Pilot Programs
and Analysis of Test Data
*912 Vehicles Tested
' • Average Test Duration: 10-20 min.
• Feasible to Conduct Roadside Test
• Snap-Idle Test Preferable to
Standing or Rolling Acceleration Test
• 40%-55% Peak Opacity Proposed as
' Standards for Snap-Idle Test
• Electronic Smoke Measurement Preferred
over Visual
A-?-
-------
Pilot Program Vehicle
Repair Sub-Program *
i
j
s
| * 58 Vehicles Repaired and Retested
i
j • Repairs Funded by ARB/EMA
! * Average Cost of Repair: $600
I • Average Opacity Reduction: 43.3%
i
i • Average Final Opacity: 23%
* Common Repairs: Smoke Puff Limiter, Fuel Pump,
| Fuel Injectors
• Includes One-Half to One Oay in Repair Shop
Smoke Reduction After Repair
ARB Pilot Repair Program
Peak Smoke OpacltyCft)
MAX MEAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN
BEFORE REPAIR AFTER REPAIR
aarnoi* 31st sa
A-0
-------
Key Program Elements
t
r
I
j * Begins Summer 1991
; • Snap-Idle Smote Test (Diesel Vehicles Only)
• * Electronic Smoke Measurement (Smoke Meter)
* Emission Control System Tampering Check (Gas & Diesel)
* Computerized Prior-Violation Check
' * Inspections conducted at Weigh Stations/Fleet/Roadside
locations
i
i
* California and Out-of-State Trucks
* Appeal Process
Snap-Idle Test
Merits
j
| • Easy to Perform
: * Safe & Quick
i
* Facilitates Meter Usage
; • Performed Anywhere
* Very Effective
! • CTA & EMA Approved
1 A-1
-------
Snap-Idle Test
Description
t
\ • Rapid Engine Accelerations
I (To Maximum Governor Speed)
j !
, • Performed on Fully Warmed Engines
• Transmission Disengaged, Wheels Chocked ,
• 3 "Clean-Out" Snaps ,
i
• 3 Test Snaps i
- Closest Peak Smoke Readings Averaged
i i
I
\ '
\
First Year
Smoke Standards
(Peak Opacity)
(A) 1991 and Newer Model-Year Engine Families
40 %
i
| (B) 1990 and Older Model-Year Engine Families
| 55 %
* Exemptions May Be Warranted Per Manufacturer
h-(o
-------
Second & Subsequent Year
Proposed Smoke Standards*
! (Peak Opacity) j
i 1
! !
I i
! (C) 1974 and Newer Model-Year Engine Families
I 40 % !
j (D) 1973 and Older Model-Year Engine Families |
i
55 %
, »
i
! I
i
* Exemptions May Be Warranted Per Manufacturer
Emission Controls Inspection
Diesel Vehicles
• Governor
• Trap
• Other
Gasoline Vehicles
• Catalyst
• EGR
• Air Injection
• Evap System
• Other
-------
Penalty Structure
j
* First Violation j
I
* Second & Subsequent Violations !
i
* Out-of-Service j
i
I
First Violation
f $800: if Not Corrected Within 45 Days
* $300: If Corrected Within 45 Days
Corrective Action
* Monetary Penalty Payment;
* Repair Receipts or
* Post-Repair Test
A-fSt
-------
Second/Subsequent Violations
~ $1,800; 45 Days to Repair
(No Penalty Reduction)
Corrective Action
* Payment of all Past Monetary Penalties
• Payment of $1,800 Penalty
* Mandatory Post-Repair Test
Out of Service
* Optional at Any Time
* Vehicle Towed and Stored
CgrregftVe Actm
* Payment of all Past Penalties
and Accrued Costs
* 15 Days to Repair Vehicle
Upon Reiease
* Mandatory Post-Repair Test
-------
Appeals Process !
i
i
* Enacted by SB 1874 j
* Administrative Hearing
i
* Conducted by Hearing Officer |
* Judgements May go to Superior Court j
after Final Order
i
i
i
Diesel Emissions
-------
Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions
(NOx J PM)
I
I
I
Causes of Excessive
Diesel Smoke Emissions
! Mai-Maintenance
j Injector Wear/Failure
Injection Timing
Clogged Air Filter
Turborcharger/Aftercooier
Internal Engine Wear
Tampering
Smoke Puff Limiter
Maximum Fuel Setting
i
Fuel Injectors
Injection Timing 1
A-f^
-------
I
Health and Environmental Effects
Constituent
- Particulates
- HC and NOx
- SOx and NOx
- Other Toxic Air
Contaminants
Detrimental Effect
- Carcinogenic
- Mutagenic
- Visibility Impairment
- Ozone Precursors
- Acid Rain
- Carcinogenic
- Mutagenic
Estimated Benefits (1996)
Pollutant
PM
HC
NOx
Reduction
39%
27%
4%
Tons/Day
32
22
19
Reduction of Smoking Trucks
57 %
A~(6
-------
Recommendations
* Conduct Proper Maintenance 1
(Per Manufacturer's Recommendation)
* Prevent Engine Tampering j
(Tampering Constitutes Failure) i
* Test Smoke Levels At Regular Intervals
i
* Have Engine Properly Identified •* !
(Correctly Label Engine)
i
i
— Soma Engma Families May Be Examoted From The j
Mora Stringent Standards Upon Proper Identification
Smoke Test Equipment
Smoke Meter
Strip Chart Recorder
-------
-------
California Air Resources Board
Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Smoke and Tampering
Inspection Program
Program Background
HEAVY-PUTY VFHfCIF THOrrTTnH P30BBAM BAOTSROtlMD
In 198E, the California Legislature enacted Senate 3ill (SB)
1997 authored by Senator Robert Presley of Riverside. This,
bill was designed to enhance California's Smog Check Program
and to provide for the adoption of a Heavy-Quty Vehicle
Smoke and Tampering Inspection Proqram ("HQVIP") far
gasoline and diesel fueled interstate and intrastate
vehicles operating in California. The dill requires the Air
Resources Board (ARB) to design and jointly administer this
program in conjunction with the "Ca 11 fornia Highway Patrol
(CHP). Inspections will be conducted at CMP inspection and
weigh stations, it randora roadside locations, and fleets
statewide.
S3 1997 also provided for the creation of an Ad Hoc Advisory
Committee, comprised of representatives from the ARB, CHP,
South Coast A1r Quality Management District (SCAQMD), heavy-
duty vehicle engine manufacturer* (.represented by the Engine
Manufacturer4s Association (EMA)), and heavy-duty vehicle
ooeratars/earrieri (represented by tfta California Trucking
Association (CTA)j. This Ad Hoc Advisory Committee is
mandated to work cooperatively with the ARB and CHP to
develop inspection and enforcement procedures for this
program. The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee has been meeting on
an on-going basis since early 1989.
SB 1997 authorizes the ARB to issue citations to vehicles
falling the prescribed test procedures and requires cited
vehicles to immediately correct deficiencies s?8tifud m
the citation. If the required corrective action is not
taken, violators are subject to the assessment of civil
penalties up to $1500 per day for each day the vehicle is m
violation. An addttiona] 5300 civil penalty will be
assessed with each citation issued pursuant to the
provisions of Assembly Bill (A8) 1107 of 1989. Tftese
additional civil penalties will be deposited into the
"Diesel Emission Reduction Fund" which will support diesel
fuel research undertaken by the California Energy Commission
(CEC). If a cited vehicle owner fails to take corrective
action or pay the civil penalties levied, the CHP may remove
A
-------
the vehicle from service until such time corrective action
is taken and/or the civil penalties are paid.
To compliment SB 1997, in 1990 the Legislature enacted SB
1874 to provide a. velucle owner recourse to a
judicial hearing for a citation through an administrative
hearing process prior to the enforcement of a citation. The
ARB is required to develop appropriate regulations to govern
the conduct of the administrative hearing.
The provisions of SB 1997 and AB 1107, pertaining to this
program, may be found in section 44011.6 et seq. of the
California Health and Safety Cede. (A copy of section
44011.6 of the Health and Safety Code is attached hereto.)
II. THE BASTS FOB A HgAVV-OHTV VFHTCLF THSPFCTTQM PBOfiRAM
HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE EMISSIONS: TYPES, CAUSES, EFFECTS,
CONTROLS ANO BENEFITS OF CONTROLS
A significant number of in-use heavy-duty vehicles are
dlesel fueled. The following is a brief discussion of the:
inventory and types of emissions that are emitted from
heavy-duty diesel engines; their causes; adverse effects;
control strategies used to reduce these emissions; and the
benefits of controlling these emissions.
A. INVENTORY ANO TYPES OF HlAVY-OUTY DIESEL EN6INE
EMISSIONS
There are approximately 200,000 heavy-duty diesel
vehicles in service in California. These vehicles
travel approximately 27 million miles per day (135
ml les/day/vehicle on average) and use 1.5 billion
gallons of fuel each year.
These vehicles enit an average each day: 80 tons af
sulfur oxides [SOi), 543 tans of nitrogen oxides
(N0x), 123 tons of particulate matter (PM), and 107
tons of hydrocarbons (HC). These vehicles also emit
carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (C02), and
miscellaneous toxic compounds such as benzene,
aldehydes, 1,3 butadiene, and xylene. These vehicles
account far 301 of the NOx and 751 of the PM emissions
from on-road vehicles.
B. CAUSES OF EXCESSIVE HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL ENGINE EMISSIONS
Tampering with and maImaintenance of specific engine
components and raalmaiitenance of the engine itself are
A-3L0
-2-
-------
the primary causes of excessive diesel emissions.
Examples of specific components or systems which are
tampered with or ma(maintained are: the fuel injection
pump and seals, fuel injection timing, fuel injectors,
smoke/puff llmiter, air filter, intercooler,
turbocharger, exhaust gas recirculation valve and the
internal engine itself. Other causes of excessive
emissions are pressure leaks in the injection system
or manifolds, excessive backpressure in the exhaust
system and fuol problems such as water contamination,
wrong grade being used, etc.
C. EFFECTS OF EXCESSIVE HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL ENGINE
EMISSIONS
As discussed above, diesel engines emit numerous
species of exhaust emissions. The emissions of most
concern, in terms of their deleterious effects on
public health, the environment and agriculture, are:
carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, sulfur and
nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, toxies and
particulates.
Carbon monoxide (CO) ttas numerous adverse public
health effects. The most prevalent is its effect on
displacing hemoglobin proteins in the bloodstream
causing oxygen deprivation to vital organs such as the
brain. Exposure to high concentrations of carbon
monoxide can causa headaches, severe physiological
distress and even death under certain circumstances.
Currently there are nine (9) California cities which
violate the federal CO publle health based standard.
Carbon dloild* (C02) has been identified as a
'greenhouse* gas which is believed to contribute to
global warming (i.e. the "greenhouse effect").
Sulfur oxides (SQx) and nitrogen oxides. (HQx) are
gases which, combine with moisture in the atmosphere
to, produce sulfuric and nitric acids which are
deposited Into the environment via fog and rain. Ac id
deposition (rain and fog) are harmful to soil and
water systems in that it effects the pH balance (i.e.
causes excessive acidity) of these systems. This
results in loss or damage to agriculture, forests and
aquatic life (fish and plants). These emissions are
also responsible for nitrate and sulfate formation
which causes reduced visibility and impairs
respiration. Many regions in California suffer from
acid deposition exposure including the Lake Tahoe
region and Yosemite National Park.
-3-
-------
Hydrocarbons (HC) and NOx are gases which combine with
sunlight in the atmosphere to form photochemical
oxidants (SM06). Smog is associated with increased
aggravation of the cardiovascular and respiratory
systems and has been found to Increase the incidence
of bronchitis, emphysema and cancer in various
epidemiological (public health) studies. Over 50. of
California's population is adversely effected by smog.
Joint ARB and University of California studies show
that smog exposure contributes to 80,000 deaths per
year in California. Also, due to high smog
concentrations In the Los Angeles region, outdoor
exercise is cancelled over 100 times per year for
school children. Smog is also harmful to plants (and
trees) because it effects respiration and
photosynthesis, damages leaves, reduces crop yields,
reduces quality and size of crops, and in some
instances causes plant death. Joint ARB and
University of California studies have shown that smog
causes agricultural losses totaling over S300 million
annually in California. These studies have also found
that California's major crops grown in the San Joaquin
valley (cotton, grapes, citrus, alfalfa, tomatoes) are
experiencing yield losses of 15-25X due to smog
exposure. There are eleven (11) California cities
whtch exceed the national health based smog standard
of .12 parts per nil Hon (ppa). The majority of
California exceeds the nor* restrictive state health
standard for photochealcal saog (ozone) of .09 ppm.
Particulate emissions are respirable (i.e. readily
inhaled and embedded* into the respiratory system),
contain mutagenic and carcinogenic substances and
contribute to visibility degradation. Particulates
pose a serious threat to public health because of
their tendency to deposit in the respiratory tract
resulting 1n respiratory Impairment. Particulates are
carriers of numerous toxic compounds which are known
to cause numerous adverse public health impacts.
Particulates also adhere to the leaf surfaces of
plants and impair a plant's ability to respire and
photosynthesize. There are five (5) areas in
California that exceed the federal particulate
standard.
Toxic air contaalnants pose a serious risk to public
health. The evaluation and control of toxic air
contaminants is a relatively new area of research.
Specific toxic air contaminants, such as benzene, have
been found to contain numerous carcinogenic and
mutagenic substances which pose serious public health
A-33L
-4-
-------
threats. Tha ARB is developing air toxic control
measures on an on-going basis under the provisions of
AS 1307 of 1983.
0. CONTROLS FOR DIESEL EXHAUST EMISSIONS
The primary meens for controlling diesei exhaust
amissions are:
1. Adoption of technology forcing emission
standards. Beginning with the 1991 model year
for transit bus engines and 1994 model year for
heavy-duty truck engines, heavy-duty engine
manufacturers must design engines wmch meet a
.1 grams per brake horsepower hour (g/bhp-hr)
standard for particulates and 5.0 g/bhp-hr
standard for NOx emissions. These standards
lead to engineering augmentations to engine
designs. Common areas of augmentation include:
cylinder redesign and other internal engine
mod1f1cat ions, turbocharger/supercharger
redesign, intercooler applications, fmproved
fuel Injection systems featuring electronic
controls, exhaust gas recircu1 at ion, catalytic
trap oxidizer and particulate trap oxidizer
development.
2. Fuel regulations. The ARB has adopted
regulations which regulate the maximum allowable
sulfur and aromatic hydrocarbon fraction of
diesei fuel to 0.Q5 percent and 10 percent by
weight respectively. Reductions in sulfur and
aromatic hydrocarbon levels are expected to
result In reductions of NOx, SOx and PM
emissions. Additionally, under the provisions
of AB 1107 of 1989, further research will be
conducted aimed at identifying additional means
of reducing harmful emissions from diesei fuel
combustion. Finally, heavy-duty engine
manufacturers are designing and testing
prototype engines which operate with alternative
fuels such as methanol.
3. Inspection programs. California's H0VIP 1s one
of many heavy-duty vehicle emissions inspection
programs operated 1n the nation. Other states.
Including Nevada, Colorado, Oregon, Arizona and
New Jersey, currently operate heavy-duty vehicle
emissions inspection programs. In the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (5CAQMD)
-5-
A-23
-------
region (greater Las Angeles region), the SCAQMD,
in conjunction with the CUP, operates a smoking
vehicle inspection program. Vehicles found to
be emitting excessive smoke emissions are issued
California Vehicle Code section 27153,5
citations by the CHP. The 27153.5 inspection
process differs from the HOYIP inspection
process in that the 27153.5 process features a
transient Ringlemann smoke emissions evaluation
for pass/fail determination and the HDVIP test
procedure features a stationary snap idle test
procedure for pass/fail determination. A
detailed discussion of the KDVIP test procedure
Is provided In section III below.
£. ANTICIPATED BENEFITS AND CQST-ErFECTHENESS OF PROGRAM
Based on ARB and ARB sponsored studies. It is
anticipated that the imp 1eraentat1 on of a heavy-duty
vehicle saoke and tampering inspection program will
provide for 13 tons per day of nitrogen oxide (NQi)
reduction (41 of NOx emitted from these vehicles), 22
tons per day of hydrocarbon (HC) reduction {271 of HC
emitted from these vehicles), and 32 tons per day of
particulate reduction {391 of particulates emitted
from these vehicles). In addition, it is estimated
that the HDVIP will reduce the number of on-road
eicessively smoking heavy-duty vehicles by 57 percent.
The ccst-effectlveness of these reductions is very low
when compared to costs of reductions from stationary
sources of these emissions (i.e. power plants,
refineries, etc). The anticipated cest-effectivsness
for this program is $0.44 per pound ($330 per ton)
reduced for HC and HOx combined and SO.47 per pound
(3940 per ton) redueed for particulates. By
comparison, the California I/M (Smog Check) program is
estimated to have a cost-effectiveness of $2.30 per
pound ($4600 per ton) reduced for HC and HOx combined.
III. HEAVY-QUTY VEHICLE THSPECTTQW PffOBgAM nEVELQPMFHT
PHOT INSPECTION PROGRAM
During the spring of 1389, the ARB conducted a voluntary
"pilot" heavy-duty vehicle inspection program in order to
gather data to design the permanent program. The pilot
program was conducted at the Rainbow and San Onofre CHP
inspection sttes located in Northern San Diego County and at
random roadside locations in the South Coast Air Basin.
A-^"f
-A-
-------
Approximately 600 trucks were randomly selected and tasted
In this pilot study. The test consisted of acceleration and
snap idle opacity evaluations, conducted both electronically
and visually, and an underhood tampering inspection. A 35X
smoke opacity cutpoint was used for these tests.
Approximately 240 (42X) of the tested vehicles failed the
test procedure. ARB offered to pay up to $1000 and EMA
offered to pay an additional $500 for repairs for trucks
which failed the test. Sixty (60) trucks were recruited
into this voluntary repair program. This repair program was
conducted In order to gather information on the
effectiveness of repairs in reducing opacity levels. This
data was analyzed, by ARB and an ARB engineering contractor,
In order to develop test procedures, opacity cutpoints and a
civil penalty schedule for the permanent enforcement
program. Analysis of this data found that there are three
primary causes of excessive smoke emissions: Improper
transient air fuel ratio control settings* fuel injection
timing problems, and inadequate intake (restricted air
filters, etc.)- These problems are generally corrected with
repairs costing less than $500 per vehicle.
A supplemental pilot program was conducted at the San Onofre
CHP inspection facility during February through early April
1990. An additional 310 trueks were randomly selected and
tested under this supplemental pilot program. This program
employed enhanced test procedures. Emissions and tampering
data were gathered and analyzed for the validation of the
proposed test procedures, opacity cutpoints, and
citation/civil penalty assessment schedules.
IV. PROPOSED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM DESI6N AND IMPLEMENTATION
ARB, in conjunction with the CHP and the Ad Hoc Advisory
Committee, has designed a proposed heavy-duty vehicle
emissions inspection and enforcement program. This proposed
program includes the following: vehicle selection
procedures, a peak opacity cutpoint of 401 and 552, test
procedures for measuring opacity on dlesel powared heavy-
duty vehicles and detecting tampering on gasoline and diesel
powered heavy-duty vehicles, retests, citation issuance,
civil penalty schedules and assessment, and placing vehicles
out of service.
A "non-penalty pr»-«nforceraent" program was implemented in
June of 1990 at selected CHP inspection and scale facilities
statewide. Additionally, inspections will take place at
randomly selscted roadside sites and fleets statewide.
California and out-of-state registered vehicles will be
-7-
h-25~
-------
tested under this program. Diesel fueled vehicles will be
inspected for excessive smoke eraissions.and gasoline fueled
vehicles will be inspected for tampering with emission
control systems. The ARB, at its discretion, may inspect
diesel fueled vehicles for tampering with their emission
controls and emission related controls. All inspections
will be entered into an ARB field computer system. This
will enable ARB to track citations and evaluate the
program's effectiveness. Citations will be issued once
regulations are promulgated for this pro-gram, which is
anticipated to occur in early 1991. ARB has proposed that a
graduated civil penalty schedule be employed; which is
consistent with vehicle repair costs. Proposed penalties
range from $800 for first level citations to $1800 for
second and subsequent level citations. First level citation
penalties will be reduced to $300 if the cited vehicle is
repaired with a 45 day period and if repair documentation is
provided. A vehicle which falls to clear Its citation is
subject to removal from service by the CHP. The vehicle
will not be released until all outstanding penalties are
paid. Once the outstanding penalties are paid, the vehicle
will then be released for repairs. In order to clear the
citation, the vehicle owner must repair and submit the
vehicle to a retest within 15 days from the date of its
re tease.
Under the proposed rules for the administrative hearing
process, a hearing will be conducted upon the request of the
owner of the cited vehicles. These "administrative
hearings" will be conducted by a hearing officer: an
independent, in-house administrative law judge appointed by
the Board, who will have broad authority to take those
actions neeessary for a full and fair adjudication of a
contested citation. The vehicle owner will have a
opportunity to present his or her response to the citation
an-d to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
Pursuant to section 44011.6(1) of the Health and Safety
code, if an owner does not request a hearing within thirty
days, the citation issued by ARB staff is final and not
subject to review by any court or agency. If the owner
requests a hearing, the decision rendered pursuant to the
proposed rules 1s final and not subject to review by any
court or agency unless the owner seeks judicial review
As of Hay 1991, the rules governing the administrative hearing
process were still being developed.
2G
-------
within sixty days of the mailing of the administrative
hearing decision.
Following two years of program operation, ARB, along with
the CHP, will submit a report to the State Legislature on
the effectiveness of the program. This report will provide
recommendations to improve the program.
If you have any questions regarding this program, or any
other ARB program, please contact the staff of the Heavy-
Duty Diesel Branch, Mobile Source Oivision at 916/322-7Q61
in Northern California or 818/450-6158 in Southern
Ca 1 i form a.
-9-
A-27-
-------
-------
Health & Safety Code
Section 44011.6
1 SEC 16. Section 44011.6 of the Health and Safety
2 Code is amended to read:
3 44011.6. (a) As expeditiously as possible, the state
4 board shall develop a test procedure for the detection of
5 excessive smoke emissions from heavy-duty diesei motor
6 vehicles that is feasible for use in an intermittent roadside
7 inspection program. During the development of the test
3 procedure, the state board shall cooperate with the
9 Department of the California Highway Patrol in
10 conducting roadside inspections. The state board may
11 also specify visual or functional inspection procedures to
12 determine the presence of tampering or defective
13 emissions control systems in heavy-duty diesei or
14 heavy-duty ga«nlini» motor vehicles. The chairperson of
15 the state board shall appoint an ad hoc advisory
16 committee which shall include, but not be limited to,
17 representatives of heavy-duty manufacturers,
IS carriers of property for compensation using heavy-duty
19 gasoline or diesei motor vehicles, and the Department of
20 the California Highway Patrol. The advisory committee
21 shall cooperate with the state board to develop a test
22 procedure pursuant to this subdivision and shall advise
23 the state board in developing regulations to implement
24 test procedures and inspection of heavy-duty commercial
25 motor vehicles.
26 (b) The state board shall, by regulation, prohibit the
27 use of heavy-duty motor vehicles which are determined
28 to have excessive smoke emissions or other
29 emissions-related defects, using the test procedure
30 established pursuant to subdivision (a). However, visual
31 or functional inspection procedures for heavy-duty
32 gasoline vehicles shall not be more stringent fhan those
33 prescribed by the department for heavy-duty gasoline
34 vehicles subject to biennial inspection pursuant to
35 Section 44013. The state board may issue a citation to the
A-3.1
-------
36 owner or operator for any vehicle in violation of
37 regulations adopted under this subdivision. These
38 regulations may require the operator of a vehicle to
39 submit to a test procedure adopted pursuant to
40 subdivision (a), may specify that refusal to so submit is a
1 violation of the regulations, and shall require that, when
2 a citation has been issued, th6 owner of a vehicle in
3 violation of the regulations shall immediately correct
4 every deficiency specified in the citation.
5 (c) The department may develop criteria for one or
6 more Hassps of smog cheek stations capable of
7 determining compliance with .regulations adopted
3 pursuant to subdivision (b) and may authorize those
9 stations to issue certificates of compliance to vehicles in
10 compliance with the regulations. The department may
11 contract for the operation of .smog check, stations for
12 heavy-duty vehicles pursuant to this subdivision, and only
13 heavy-duty vehicles may be inspected at these stations.
14 (d) In addition to the corrective action required by
15 subdivision (b), the owner of a motor vehicle in violation
15 of the regulations adopted pursuant to subdivision (b) is
17 subject to a civil penalty of not more than one thousand
IS five hundred dollars ($1,500) per day for each day that
19 the vehicle is in violation. The state board may adopt a
20 schedule of reduced civil penalties to be applied in cases
21 where violations are corrected in an expeditious manner.
' 22 The schedule of reduced civil penalties shall not,
23 however, apply where there have been repeated
24 incidents of emissions control system tampering. All civil
25 penalties imposed pursuant to this subdivision shall be
25 collected by the state board and deposited in the Vehicle
27 Inspection and Repair Fund. Funds in the Vehicle
28 Inspection and Repair Fund shall, when appropriated by
29 the Legislature, be available to the state board and the
30 Department of the California Highway Patrol for the
31 conduct of intermittent' roadside inspections of
32 heavy-duty vehicles pursuant to this section.
A
-------
33 (e) Following the adoption of regulations pursuant to
34 subdivision (b), the state board and the Department of
35 the California Highway Patrol shall commence
36 inspecting heavy-duty motor vehicles. With the
37 concurrence of the Department of the California
38 Highway Patrol, these inspections may be conducted in
39 conjunction with the safety and weight enforcement
40 activities of the Department of the California Highway
1 Patrol or at other locations selected by the state board or
2 the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
3 Inspection locations may include private facilities where
4 fleet vehicles are serviced or maintained. The state board
5 and the Department of the California Highway Patrol
6 may conduct these inspections either cooperatively or
7 independendy, and the state board may contract for
3 assistance in the conduct of these inspections.
9 (f) The state board inform the Department of the
10 California Highway Patrol whenever a vehicle owner
11 cited pursuant to subdivision (b) fails to take a required
12 corrective action or to pay the a civil penalties penalty
13 levied pursuant to aubdiiiaiegj subdivision (d) and (b) in
14 a timely mannor.^tU nn|un Enm lit a# CnUfowMn
15 iiifoiiHiilieB?
16 wquiTP. WU hft tmryvm h.ipU.h. nwrtl
17 the emt penalty « gate sb4 Ac eowccfevc aetien. fealeea.
IS Following notice and opportunity for an administrative
19 hearing pursuant to subdivision (i), the state board may
20 request the Department of the California Highway Patrol
21 to order the vehicle stored. Upon notification from the
22 state board of payment of any civil penalties imposed
23 under subdivision (d) and storage and related charges,
24 the vehicle shall be re/eased to the owner or designee.
25 Upon release of the vehicle, the owner or designee shall
26 correct every de&ciency specified in any citation to that
ZI owner with respect to the vehicle.
23 (g) The state board, in consultation with the
29 Department of the California Highway Patrol, ffrall
30 within two years of the adoption of regulations pursuant
31 to subdivision (b), prepare and submit to the Legislature
A-31
-------
32 a report on the smoke emissions enforcement program
33 conducted under this section, including, but not limited
34 to, its assessment of the effectiveness of the program, the
35 impact of the program on the operations of the
36 Department of the California Highway Patrol, and its
37 recommendations for changes in, alternatives to, or
38 termination of, the program.
39 (h) In addition to the corrective action required by
40 subdivision (b), and in addition to the civil penalty
1 imposed by subdivision (d), the owner of a motor vehicle
2 cited by the state board pursuant to subdivision (b) shall
3 pay a penalty of three hundred dollars ($300) per
4 citation; except that this penalty shall not apply to the
5 first citation for any schooibus. All civil penalties imposed
6 pursuant to this subdivision shall be collected by the state
7 board and deposited in the Diesel Emission Reduction
3 Fund, which fund is hereby created. Funds in the Diesel
9 Emission Reduction Fund shall, when appropriated by
10 the Legislature, be available to die State Energy
11 Resources Conservation and Development Commission
12 for research, development, and demonstration programs
13 undertaken pursuant to Section 24617 of the Public
14 Resources Code- - ->-
15 (i) The state board shall adopt regulations that afford
16 an owner cited under subdivision, (b) an. opportunity for
17 an administrative String. Any owner died under
IS subdivision (b) may request an adminisfrative hearing
19 within 15 working days following either personal receipt
20 or certified mail receipt of the riHHnn jf the owner fails
21 to request an administrative hearing within 15 working
22 days, the citation shall be deemed a order and not
23 subject to review by any court or agency. The 15-day
24 period may be extended by the administrative hearing
25 officer for good cause.
2fi (j) Following exhaustion of the review procedures
27 provided for in subdivision (i)} the state board may appiv
23 to the Superior Court of Sacramento County for a
29 judgment in the amount of the civil penalty. The
30 application, which shall include a certified copy of the
j! Snal order of the administrative hearing officer, shall
32 constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the issuance of
33 the iudffm^nt
A-3a.
-------
DIESEL SMOKE
DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION
Whits Smoke
Pjtflfih fflr Qrav Smoke
Eaftaua Smofea oonaiw ot a l«rqa numoar ot
pwaeaa ot !mI ori latgar Oun i o rracron m aiamatar.
inatOBM flm 9M *fiwt u not Bumng.'
POSSIBLE CAUSE
fiutylgnrtJotioumo
toeiugn wftc&oft
or tatty mpcson
imcwoT yifla/dlhary otfual
or too
inturi
¦ pQsswpam
MHAfMMBn ftMQtMnQ
i)
2}
3)
51
81
V
2J
3)
*)
9)
8)
75
8)
2BB»BBaaUUSfiE
9ua Smooa eonan at a larga numoar at m at
OS mwi mrjmf or im Thaaa
latuntaumoomstor
oumaa ML Thla ndtaua mat tna
o* tnd/or «n ¦lninim n ot
*UibnBttn^ OT Mnq aunwo.
ftatMng
>ana/artuaitMrind
n
2]
3i
*)
S
8)
POSSBLgmig:
-------
GASOLINE SMOKE
DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION
Black nr Gray Smoke
Slack or Gray Smoka coram at a iarga numear of
canon ovoeiaa mat * fermaa wn*n ma (ua( it n«u»a
lit ozygoMcan ragwna in ma comouason cfla/noar
Thia ia an imHrnwn mat pan at ma tual in ma
comauaMn cnamaar tiaa mt aaan qntaa u*W« an
nntrmcm at incomprfaia Oumng.
i)
a
3)
«)
5)
8)
7)
8)
3)
10)
")
12)
13)
POSSIBLE CAUSES
aogQOd or oamaoad air imaka Attar
enokognkMear or comma maifuncoon
eareumar ana/or ewke mattunaon
fual ai|«aion ayatam/alaarortiu uiiiua/gCL
fatrtry mtacaan nastes
faufly ^iwton tlirenQ
ignrton ayaam matfunaton
. angm too ooid
iptuosao
lowcykndar*
turoocnmitfToomrota mafluncaon anfl/ar
etoggaoavfinar
ami hum sywam malfunction
Mgfii
Blue SmoKe
Btua Smoka comma at raconaonaaa araoiaa or
uneumao imeomciatafy Bumaa «ngm« oti wmcn
cauaaa Wua ngm n oa sca&aiaa. Din « an inaicaitan
ot hhhiib tuancaoafl oil batng oumaa.
5)
S)
7)
')
2)
3)
*)
3)
POSSIBLE CAUSES
1) ad lavw too ftigrt or wrong wtcosny
2) "om oaaon nnga, vaiva guiOM or cytmaar
3) laafeng mam manifold Qaaxas
4) PCV Syatam aoggad
poor cyHnaar campraaawn
tureecftargar aaata Making
imamaao Banaiwaawn vacuum mnmntmr
rfflfffliFPFfiTFnr
ori lawoi/cnango ori
i aomorwaxjn taat
/daan PCVayaam
/rftmir cuioocnarqar
i vacuum
uaa Haavy black smoka on
Cdtatytto comartare w*i nav* a
svongutpnurodot.
POSSIBLE REMEDY
i)
a
3)
3)
8)
n
3)
9t
:0)
ana oataQulknuoa
s/or
c tual irqacaon ayaam ana comma
partomntuna up
[ aoeanq tyttsm
t asMtm tyan Baca oraaaura
i turoo cnargar uuiuuta ano/or tu fiJtw
ityctam
GASOLINE EWWE EXHAUST SMOKE
tllUH gffiW
of a laiqa rum oar of oantaaa or
•mating ma comouason cnamoar ana
POSSIBLE CAIJSE3
1)
eyikwar n«aa or Btock cracna
POSSIBLE REMEDY
EXTERNAL ENGINE. BLUE/GRAY SMOKE
00 failanq onto tna axftauat manrtota or txnauai
tysam *n« pmauco a tigm Dtoa^gny wnoaa ana wiU
tow an odor of bunting od.
tuns Making
4) PCVayatamooggao
T) crack all fiycraudc tyatarrta
2) cnack/ctaan POt ayatam
BCTSML £NGIN&WH»Tg SMOKE
POSSIBLE CAUSES
1) «ngnw owemaattiq (boding}
2) coourn Making on not angm* or onto axnauai
1) cna
tyatam
34
-------
State of California
AIR RESOURCES BOARD
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF MODIFIED TEXT
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF NEW REGULATIONS ESTABLISHING A
ROADSIDE SMOKE AND EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR IN-USE
HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL AND GASOLINE-POWERED VEHICLES.
Public Hearing Date: November 8. 1990
Public Ave^abUlty AprM 10, 1331
Deadline for Public Comment: April 25, 1991
On November 8, 1990, the Air Resources Board (the "Board") considered
the adoption of regulations establishing a roadside smoke and emission
control system Inspection program for 1n-use heavy-duty dlesel and gasoline-
powered vehicles. The Board approved, with some modifications, the
regulations as originally proposed by staff. The proposal provides for the
addition to Title 13, California Code of Regulations (CCR) of sections 2180
through 2187. Section 2182 will Incorporate by reference Society of
Automotive Engineers (SAE) publication J1243, "Diesel Emission Production
Audit Test Procedure", (May 1908) sections 7.4. 7.5 (subsections 1-4}, 8.1,
and 8.2.
As approved, the regulatory additions Include the following
modifications to the noticed proposal:
1. Sectmn ?iaom
The original proposal has been modified to clarify that the regulations
apply to pre-1974 model-year dlesel-powered and gasoline-powered heavy-duty
vehicles.
2. Section n8Q-U*u?\rmaiu?
-------
-2-
3. S»rMan yiBUeim
The original proposal, requiring inspectors to obtain engine
identification information only from vehicles with test procedure smoke
opacity levels between forty (40) and f1fty-f1ve (55) percent, has been
modified to include all vehicles. When a vehicle's smoke emissions exceed
fifty-five (55) percent smoke opacity, the engine still needs to be
identified to determine whether the repaired vehicle must conform to a forty
(40) or fifty-five (55) percent standard.
4. Section 2182(a) and (b)
The original proposal, requiring heavy-duty dlesel vehicles with
th1rty-f1ve (35) percent or less smoke opacity certification levels to meet
a forty (40) percent test procedure standard, has been modified to require
1974 through 1990 model-year heavy-duty dlesel vehicles to meet this
standard unless exempted under (e) for inherent engine design limitations or
under (f) for having an ARB approved aftermarket turbocharger. The original
proposal has also been modified to require all 1991 and later model-year
heavy-duty dlesel vehicles to meet the forty (40) percent test procedure
standard unless exempted under (f) for having an ARB approved aftermarket
turbocharger. Engine manufacturers provided Information that beginning with
the 1991 model-year all heavy-duty dlesel vehicles will meet a forty (40)
percent peak smoke opacity standard because the engines must meet more
stringent particulate matter certification standards, which will result 1n
very low visible smoke emissions.
5. Section 2\*2(c\
The original proposal, requiring heavy-duty dlesel vehicles with
thirty-five (35) percent or less smoke opacity certification levels to meet
a forty (40) percent test procedure standard, has been modified to require
all 1992 or subsequent model-year vehicles to meet this standard because of
the information provided by the engine manufacturers.
6. Seetlon 2W2(«n
The original proposal required all heavy-duty dlesel vehicles, other
than those with a Federal peak smoke engine certification level of thirty-
five (35) percent opacity or less, to meet a f1fty-f1ve (55) percent
standard. The proposal has been modified to require all heavy-duty diesel
vehicles other than 1974 through 1990 model-year vehicles within the thirty-
five (35) percent certification level to meet the f1fty-f1ve (55) percent
standard unless the engine is exempted under (e) or (f). The proposal has
also been modified to clarify that the f1fty-f1ve (55) percent standard
applies to pre-1974 model-year heavy-duty dlesel vehicles.
7. Section
A-3(y
-------
-3-
The original proposal, requiring that vehicles with a Federal peak
smoke engine certification levels less than thirty-five (35) percent peak
opacity must meet a forty (40) percent standard and with a greater than
thirty-five (35) percent peak opacity must meet a fifty-five (55) percent
standard has been modified to provide exemptions from these standards far a
small number of engine families. Engine manufacturers provided data showing
that same vehicles in good operating condition could not meet either of
these standards due to engine design limitations. To prevent false
failures, the proposal has been modified so that these engine families must
comply with a technologically appropriate higher opacity standard to be
determined by the Executive Officer.
8. Section 2182ff)
The original proposal, which did not deal with the effect of add-on
after-market turbocharger kits on heavy-duty dlesel smoke opacity, has been
modified to provide exemptions for pre-1992 model-year heavy-duty diesel-
powered vehicles equipped with add-on turbocharger kits previously approved
by the ARB under Title 13, CCR section 2222(e). An exemption from the
applicable forty (40) or fifty-five (55) percent test procedure standard
will be granted provided that the turbocharger manufacturer submits snap-
idle test data showing that smoke emissions exceed the applicable standard
when the turbocharger is properly installed on an engine in good operating
condition. According to manufacturers, the installation of these kits on
lighter heavy-duty dlesel vehicles will result 1n high snap-idle smoke
levels because these vehicles lack smoke puff Matters that are normally
present on heavier heavy-duty dlesel vehicles equipped with original
equipment manufacturer turbochargers. This modification to the proposal
will prevent false failures of lighter heavy-duty dlesel vehicles equipped
with ARB approved add-on aftermarkut turbocharger kits. These vehicles must
comply with a technologically appropriate higher standard which will be
determined by the Executive Officer.
9. Section (iU2\
The original proposal, requiring that the smoke opacity measurement
equipment comply with manufacturer's specifications, Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE) procedure J1243, section 7, and certain regulatory
specifications, has been modified to require that the equipment comply with
SAE procedure J1243 entitled "Diesel Emission Production Audit Test
Procedure", because 1t sets forth specifications generally accepted in the
automotive industry. The modified proposal incorporates provisions
regarding end-of-line smoke raeesuring and calibration techniques from this
report.
10. Section ?195
-------
-4-
engine certification level less than thirty-five (35) percent peak opacity
must meet a forty (40) percent test procedure standard, has bean modified to
allow a one-year or longer phase-in period for these pre-1991 model-year
vehicles with less than a f1fty-f1ve (55) percent test procedure opacity
result. The original proposal also has been modified to provide for a
warning rather than Issuance of a citation for these vehicles with smoke
levels between forty (40) and f1fty-f1ve (55) percent. The modifications
are based on the engine manufacturers' concerns about the need for
exemptions for some engine families from the forty (40) percent opacity
standard because of design limitations, and about whether all repair
facilities by the effective date of the regulations would be capable of
repairing heavy-duty dlesel vehicles to meet a forty (40) percent standard.
The phase-in of the forty (40) percent standard will allow time for
granting of exemptions and Improvement of repair capability. When an
eligible vehicle's smoke emissions exceed forty (40) percent and are less
than ftfty-flve (55) percent, the owner will be advised of the forty (40)
percent standard phase-in period, but will not be required to pay a civil
penalty. All pre-1991 model-year heavy-duty dlesel-powered vehicles will be
required to meet the fifty-five (55) percent standard except for vehicles
with afterroarket turbochargers exemptions pursuant to section 2182(f) and
vehicles with engine design limitations pursuant to section 2182(e). During
the phase-In period, ARB staff will evaluate the heavy-duty dlesel vehicle
repair industry's effectiveness 1n reducing smoke emission levels. Field
staff will record smoke levels before and after repairs of vehicles that
received warnings. This data and Information provided by engine
manufacturers and developed at public workshops will be used by the
Executive Officer to determine 1f the phase-in period should be extended
beyond one year and also to determine If a test procedure standard other
than forty (40) or fifty-five (55) percent 1s technologically appropriate
for some engine families.
11. Section
The original proposal has been modified to conform with the format of
the other sections.
Some reference changes have been necessitated by the modifications of
the noticed proposal. Section 21B2 has been relettered because the original
proposed peak opacity standards in subsections (a) and (b) have been
modified to deal specifically with 1991 model-year and 1992 and subsequent
model-year heavy-duty dlesel vehicles and to provide for inherent engine
design limitation and approved aftermarket turbocharger exemptions. Section
2185 has been modified to provide for the phase-In period and portions of
the section have been relettered. Changes 1n other sections have been made
for cross-references to these modified sections.
In addition, the staff has added to the rulemaking record the Society
of Automotive Engineers (SAE) procedure J1243, "01es«l Emission Production
4-38
-------
-5-
Audit Test Procedure" (May 1988). A copy of this document is included as an
attachment to this notice.
Appended hereto is a copy of Board Resolution 90-64, which approves the
proposed regulations setting forth the test procedure, smoke opacity
standards, emission control system inspections, and civil penalty structure
applicable to heavy-duty diesel and gasoline-powered vehicles. Attached to
the resolution is the approved language of the regulations with additions to
the originally proposed text shown in single under 1ina and deletions shown
by strike out\.
In accordance with Government Code section 11346.8, the Board directed
the Executive Officer to adopt the amendments, as approved, after making
them available to the public for comment for a period of at least fifteen
(15) days, to consider written comments submitted during this period, to
make modifications to the regulations as may be appropriate In light of the
comments received, and to present the regulations to the Board for further
consideration if he determines that this action is warranted.
Written comments must be submitted to the Board Secretary, Air
Resources Board, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, California 95812, no later
than April 25, 1991, for consideration by the Executive Officer. Only
comments relating to the modifications described in this notice will be
considered by the Executive Officer.
Attachments
A-39
-------
-------
PROPOSED HEW REGULATIONS REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A
ROADSIDE SMOKE AND EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM INSPECTION FOR
ALL IN-USE HEAYY-DUTY DIESEL- AND SASOLINE-POWERED VEHICLES
TITLE 13, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, SECTIONS AFFECTED
Section 2180 - Applicability
Section 2180.1 - Definitions
Section 2181 - Responsibilities Ouring Inspection Procedure
Section 2182 - Heavy-Duty Diesel Yehicle Smoke Opacity Test
Procedure
Section 2183 - Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emission Control System
Inspection
Section 2184 . Refusal to Submit to Inspection Procedure
Section 2185 - Civil Penalty Schedule
Section 2186 - Demonstration of Correction and Post-Repair Test
Inspection
Section 2187 . Vehicles Removed From Service
Note: The entire text of Subchapter 3.5 set forth in this rulemaking is
new language to be added to the California Code of Regulations. Proposed
additions to the text of the originally-noticed proposal are shown in
under line, and deletions are shown in ttMkeeut.
Ml
-------
7
TA.s Bi^tk
A-4A
-------
Add Subchapter 3.5, Title 13, California Code of Regulations to read as
follows:
Subchapter 3.5. Heavy-Outy Diesel Sooke Eaission Test Procedure, and Heavy-
Duty Vehicle Eaission Control Systea Inspections
2180. Applicability.
(a) This subchapter applies to all dlesel-powered and gasoline-powered
hgavv-dutv vehicles. including nr»-iq74 modeUviMr vehicles,
a 6t881 pounds maRu^aetupef>-« naiMUM gpese veh4e4e wetgnfe (SVWH)
and gpeatep operating in the State of California.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 33601, 43013, and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code.
2180.1 Definitions.
(a) The definitions of this section supplement and are governed by the
definitions set forth in Chapter 2 (conreencing with Section
39010), Part 1, Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code. The
following definitions shall govern the provisions of this
subchapter.
(1} "Basic penalty" means the reduced civil penalty of five
hundred dollars ($500) for a test procedure or emission
control system inspection violation that is deposited in the
Vehicle Inspection and Repair Fund.
(2) "Certification level" means the opacity for each 1974 and
suhseauent tngd»l-vi»»r heavv-dutv diesel-nowsmd «n
-------
(5) "Demonstration of correction" means a repair receipt from a
repair facility, a completed work order from a fleet repair
or fleet maintenance facility, or successful completion of a
post-repair test or inspection.
(6) "Driver" has the same meaning as defined in California
Vehicle Code section 305.
(7) "Emission control label" means the label required by the
"California Motor Vehicle Emission Control Label
Specifications', incorporated by reference in 13 CCR,
Siection 1965, or Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (40
CFR), S&ection 85.874-35 or 40 CFR Part 86, Subpart A.
(8) "Emission control system" means the pollution control
components on an engine at the time of Its engine family
certification, including, but not limited to, the emission
control label.
(9) "Executive Officer" means the Executive Officer of the Air
Resources Board or his or her designee.
(10) "Fleet" means three (3) or more heavy-duty vehicles.
(11) "Full power position" means the throttle position at which
the engine fuel delivery is at maximum flow.
(12) "Heavy-duty vehicle" means a vehicle having w4th ST001
peunde a manufacturer's naiimua gross vehicle weight rating
(6VWR) of fc-001 or mar* naunri< and greater
(13) "Inspection procedure" means the test procedure specified in
section 2182 and the emission controlssystem inspection
specified in section 2133.
(14) "Inspection site" means an area including a random roadside
location, a weigh station, or a fleet facility selected used
for the purpose of conducting the heavy-duty vehicle test
procedure and ^emission control system inspection, or
both.
(15) "Inspector" means an Air Resources Board employee whose
primary duty is enforcing Health and Safety Code section
44011.6 and Title 13, CCR section 2180 et seq.
(16) "Issuance" means the date the citation is mailed to. or
personally handed by an inspector to. the owner.
- 2 -
fii-M
-------
(17) "Minimum penalty" means the three hundred dollar ($300.00)
penalty that is to be deposited in the Diesel Emission
Reduction Fund for State Energy Resources Conservation and
Development Commission (CEC) programs pursuant to Health and
Safety Code section 44011.6(h).
(18) "Officer" means a uniformed member of the Department of the
California Highway Patrol.
(19) "Opacity" means the percentage of light obstructed from
passage through an exhaust smoke plume.
(20) "Owner" means the person registered by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), or its equivalent in
another state, as the owner of the vehicle.
(21) "Post-repair inspection" means a repeat emission control
system inspection procedure for the purpose of determining
compliance of a cited vehicle.
(22) "Post-repair test" means a repeat test procedure for the
purpose of determining compliance of a cited vehicle.
(23) "Remove from service" means the towing and storage of a
vehicle under the auspices of the Department of the
California Highway Patrol.
(24) "Repair facility" means any place where heavy-duty vehicles
are repaired, rebuilt, reconditioned, or 1n any way
maintained for the public at a charge, and fleet maintenance
faci1itles.
(25) "Schoolbus" means the same as defined 1n California Vehicle
Code section 54S.
(26) "Smokemeter" means a detection device used to measure the
opacity of smoke in percent opacity.
(27) "Snap-idle cycle" means rapidly depressing the accelerator
pedal from normal idle to the full power position, holding
the pedal in this position for no longer than ten seconds or
until the engine reaches maximum speed, and fully releasing
the pedal so that the engine decelerates to normal idle.
(28) "Tampered" means missing, modified, or disconnected.
(29) "Test opacity" means the smokemeter measurement of opacity
for the purpose of determining compliance with section
2182(a) and w through 2182fTl.
-------
(30) "Test procedure" means the preconditioning sequence and smoke
opacity measurement processes for determining compliance with
section 2182.
fan 'Uncleared citation" means a citation for which demonstration
of correction and, if required, payment of anv civil penalty.
has not been made.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601. 43013. and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Section 505 Vehicle
Code.
2181. Responsibilities During Inspection Procedure.
(a) The driver of a heavy-duty dlesel vehicle selected to undergo the
inspection procedure shall do all of the following:
(1) Drive the vehicle to the inspection site upon direction of an
off leer.
(2) Perform the test procedure upon request by an inspector.
(3) Open the vehicle door so that the Inspector can observe the
driver depress the accelerator pedal.
(4) Permit an mission control systea Inspection upon the request
of the inspector.
(5) Sign the citation to acknowledge Its receipt and the smoke
test strip chart to acknowledge performance of the test
procedure.
(b) The driver of a heavy-duty gasoline vehicle selected to undergo
the inspection shall:
(1) Drive the vehicle to the inspection site upon direction of
an officer.
(2) Permit an emission control system Inspection upon request
of the Inspector.
(3) Sign the citation to acknowledge its receipt.
(c) The inspector in performing the Inspection procedure shall do all
of the following:
A-46
-------
(1)
Advisa the driver that refusal to submit to the inspection
procedure is a violation of these regulations.
(2) Obtain engine identification information from a vehicle that
has a smoke epas4fcy 4eve4 between fapfey (49) pepeenfe and
(51} pepaeaW when tested pursuant to section
2182^^1ji t to determine which opacity standard specified
in section 2182(a) ep through 2182 would apply.
(3) Issue a copy of the citation to the driver of a vehicle that
fails the test procedure or the emission control system
inspection.
(4) Issue a warning to the owner of a heavy-duty diesel-pcwered
vehicle missing its emission control label that the engine
serial or identification number must be provided to the ARB
within thirty (30) calendar days or it will be conclusively
presumed that the vehicle has a certification level equal to
or less than thirty-five (36) percent peak smoke opacity.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013. and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Section 305 Vehicle Code.
- 5 -
A-IT-
-------
2182. Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle Smoke Opacity Test Procedure.
(a) Ho 1974 through 1990 model-year heavy-duty dtesel-powered vehicle
with a Federal peak smoke engine certification level of thirty-
five (35) percent peak opacity or less operating on the highways
within the state of California shall exceed forty (40) percent
peak smoke opacity when tested in accordance with this section
unless its ennlnw is exempted under subsection (e) or ffl below.
(b) No «th«p 1991 heavy-duty dlesel-powered vehicle operating on the
highways within the state of California shall exeeed Mfty-?4ve
(SB) forty (401 percent peak smoke opacity when tested 1n
accordance with this section unless its engine is exempted under
subsection (f> below.
IU Ha 199? Of below.
l£l The Executive Offleer shall exempt from the operation of
subsections (a\ and (dl above anv »n«nn» family that he/she
determines exhlhlt snan-idle test resuIts greater than fartv MO)
percent under (al or fifty-five (551 percent under (dl when in
good operating condition and adlt.sterf tn manufacturer's
SaeClflcaMflflS. Such ennine familv( s 1 must rnmnlv with the
tschnp^flicallv appropriate higher nnacitv standard determined bv
the Executive Officer frnm a review rf the data obtained from
engines in good oneratinn condition and adjusted to manufaeturer's
specifications.
Ill The Executive Officer shall exewmt front the oneration of
subsection* (al. (hi. and (dl ahnw anv 1991 and earlier model-
veer hwavv-rintv rflesel vehicles equipped with carryover add-on
aftermarket turhoeharner kits approved bv the ARB, that he/she
determines exhibit snao-idle test results greater than forty (401
percent under (a 1 or (hi or fiftv-flve (551 nereent under fdl when
in good operating condition and artlmted to manufaeturer's
specifications. Such vehicles must comply with the
technologically appropriate hinher nnacitv standard determined hv
the Fiecut1ve Officer from a review of the data obtained from
engines in nood operating condition and adjusted to manufacturer's
specifications
A-49
- s -
-------
(e)lfll ^ the event that a 1974 or later model-year heavy-duty
diesel-powered vehicle's engine identification cannot be
determined obtained by the inspector in order to determine the
Federal smoke certification level, the owner, within thirty (30)
calendar days of the inspection, shall provide the ARB with the
engine identification information. If the owner fails to comply
with this requirement, it Is conclusively presumed far the purpose
of suhfauantlv oerfanwinn the teat nroeedure (Mil* entts-ten
4«*eefc4eM/ that the vehicle has a Federal peak smoke
certification level equal to or less than thirty-five {35} percent
peak smoke opacity and that the fcecfc n»ait smoke opacity standard
4* 2i82fa} weuld ap»4y is forty percgnt.
(d)lhl Manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel-powered engines shall
within sixty (60) calendar dayi of th* effective-date of this
section? provide to the ABB the certification levels by model-year
for each engine family that it ha* certified to levels above
thirty-five (35) percent peak opacity and a complete list of engine
identification numbers for each of these engine families.
(e)HI The smoke opacity measurement equipment shall consist of a
light extinction type smokemeter which Includes an optical
detection unit, a control/indicator unit, and a strip chart
recorder.
(1) The smokemeter shall p»ev4d« fe» *u44 #4ewT end ef 44mt and
«ent4nueus meaaupeaont e# eihauat epaa4tyT and be ea44b«fced
aeeerd4nf to aanufastu*ep-« spa«4f4eafc4«nKv comply with the
specifications provided in the Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE1 nrgpedure J1243. "Diesel Emission Production
Audit Test Procedure¦ May 1988. which is incorporated hPr-m
bv reference, sertlnn 7.4 and shall be calibrated according
to specifications in SAE procedure J1243. section 8.2.
(2) The smokemeter and strip chart recorder shall comply te
with specifications in See^ety of Autenet4ve Eng*nee«
fSAE) procedure J1243, section 7 7.5. subsections 1 - 4t.
ant4fc4ed -Snake Measuring Equipment and InsfepumeMa^eRT
(*HJ1 The test procedure shall consist of preparation,
preconditioning, and test phases:
(1) In the preparation phase, the vehicle shall be placed at
rest, the transmission shall be placed in neutral, and the
vehicle wheels shall be properly restrained to prevent any
rolling motion.
(2) In the preconditioning phase, the vehicle shall be put
through a snap-idle cycle two or more times until two
- 7 -
-------
successive measured smoke levels are within ten (10) opacity
percent of each other. The smoke meter shall be recheefced
prior to the preconditioning sequence to determine that its
zero and span setting are adjusted te manufasfcupeF-s
«pee4f4ea«4efll according to saecifleat^ons in SAE procedure
Jl?43. section 8.1.
(3) In the test procedure phase, the vehicle shall be put
through the snap-idle cycle three times.
(4) The fineke opacity shall be measured during the
preconditioning and test phases with a smokemeter and shall
be recorded continuously on the chart recorder during each
snap-idle cycle. The maximum instantaneous value recorded
by the chart recorder shall be the smoke opacity reading.
(5) The test opacity to determine compliance with (a) and
through fdl above shall be the.average of the two meter
readings with the leant difference In opacity values. If
all three readings have successive equivalent differences
between them, the test opacity shall be the average of the
three readings.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601. 43013. and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002. 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000.
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code.
A-So
- a -
-------
2183. Heavy-Outy Vehicle Emission Control System Inspection.
(a) The heavy-duty diesel-powered vehicle emission control components
subject to Inspection for tampered or defective conditions
include, but are not United to, the following:
(1) The engine governor.
(2) Any seals and/or covers protecting the air-fuel ratio
adjustments.
(3) Any fuel injection pump seals and covers.
(4) The air cleaner and flow restriction indicator.
(5) The exhaust gas recirculation valve.
(6) The particulate matter trap system or catalytic converter
system, including pipes and valves.
(7) Related hoses, connectors, brackets, and hardware for these
components.
(8) Engine computer controls, related sensors, and actuators.
(9) Emission control label.
(10) Any other emissions-related components for a particular
vehicle/engine as determined from the manufacturer's
specifications, emission control label, certlfIcatlon data,
or published vehicle parts manuals.
(b) The heavy-duty gasoline-powered vehicle emission control
components subject to inspection for tampered or defective
conditions, include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) The air injection system.
(2) The positive crankcase ventilation system.
(3) The exhaust gas recirculation system.
(4) The catalytic converter, including pipes and valves.
(5) The evaporative emission control system.
(6) Related hoses, connectors, brackets, and hardware for these
components.
- 9 -
-------
(7} Engine computer controls, related sensors, and actuators.
(8) On-Board Diagnostic (OBO) systems for 1994 and subsequent
model year vehicles, 1f so equipped.
(9) Emission control label.
(10) Any other emissions-related component for a particular
vehicle/engine as determined from the manufacturer's
specifications, emission control label, certification data,
or published vehicle parts manuals.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013. 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code.
2184. Refusal to Submit to Inspection Procedure
(a) The refusal by an owner or driver of a vehicle to submit to the
test procedure 1n section 2182 or to the emission control system
Inspection 1n section 2183 constitutes a failure of the test
procedure or inspection, unless the driver is cited by the
California Highway Patrol for a violation of California Vehicle
Code Ssectlon 2813.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Sections 305, 505, and
2813 Vehicle Code.
2185. Civil Penalty Schedule.
(a) The owner of a heavy-duty vehicle that fails the test procedure or
the emission controls system inspection. Including by refusal to
submit, is subject to the following penalty schedule:
(1) The owner of a vehicle other than a sehoolbus that 1s cited
for the first time and for which demonstration of correction
1s provided and payment 1s made within forty-five (46)
calendar days from personal or certified mail receipt of the
citation shall pay the minimum penalty of three hundred
dollars ($300). SeheeJbusee ape eiempt {pen the R4Mmim
pena4ty fe» the v4«4at4en enJyv
A-Si
- 10 -
-------
(2) The owner of a vehicle that Is cited for the first tine and
for which demonstration of correction is not provided within
forty-five /A5> calendar days from persona] mall or certified
nail receipt of the citation shall provide demonstration of
correction and pay the minimum penalty of three hundred
dollars ($300) and the basic penalty of five hundred dollars
{S500> for a total of eight hundred dollars (5800).
Schaolbuses are exempt from the three hundred dollar ($300)
mlnlnua penalty for the first violation only.
(3) The owner of a vehicle that 1s cited within one year from the
Issuance of a previous citation for that vehicle shall within
forty-five (45) calendar days from personal or certified mail
receipt of the current citation provide demonstration of
correction and pay the penalty of one thousand five hundred
dollars ($1,500) and the minimum penalty of three hundred
dollars ($300) for a total of one thousand eight hundred
dollars ($1,800).
Lhl Th« ovner of a arw-1991 vehicle that within one v»ar after the
effective date of these regulations eiceitris the standard In
section 21B7 faK but has a smoke level less than or equal to
f1ftv-f1v» fSSl Bureent neafc opacity, shall be advited of that
failure, hut shall not he renuired to nav anv penalty
IU The Eieeutlvw Officer shall monitor this ahase-in period and
way extend the one-wear period 1n cne-vear Increments
provided that th» Air Resources Board aost rgpalr tests show
that the level of rwnair effectiveness In reducing erep
-------
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600. 39601. 43013. and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002. 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Sections 305, 505, and
545 Vehicle Code.
2186. Demonstration of Correction and Post-Repair Test or Inspection.
(a) The owner may demonstrate correction of the vehicle by submitting
to the Air Resources Board a repair receipt from a repair facility
or a completed work order from a fleet repair or maintenance
facility which contains the following information:
(1) Name, address, and phone number of the facility.
(2) Hame of mechanic.
(3) Date of the repair.
(4) Description of component repJacement£sJ. repafrXsJ., and/or
adjustment!*}..
(5) Itemized 11st of replaced componentisj., including description
of part, part number, and cost.
(b) In lieu of submitting a repair receipt or a completed work order,
the owner may demonstrate correction of the vehicle by submitting
it to a post-repair test or a post-repair inspection.
(C) The A1r Resources Roarri shall require AA post-repair test or
inspection sha44 be pejwtMd whenever!
XH a submitted repair receipt or work order does not comply with
(a) above-ri
(2) a repair receipt or varlc order appears to be falsified*.^
f3) A petfc-pepa4p test ep 4n»peefc4en »ha44 be peqw4ped second
and subsequent failures of the test procedure or an emission
control system inspection by an a Hia vehicle occur within a
one year period.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002, 39003, 39010, 39033, 43000,
43013, 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Section 505 Vehicle Code.
2187. Vehicles Removed from Service.
- 12 -
-------
(a) Vehicles are subject to removal from service by the Department of
the California Highway Patrol if requested by the Air Resources
Board inspector, and if one or more uncleared V4«4afc4en8
citations exist at the time of inspection.
(b) Upon payment by cashier's check or money order of all unpaid
penalties for a vehicle that has been removed from service, the
Air Resources Board shall provide the owner, or designee, a
release form for presentation to the Department of the California
Highway Patrol.
(c) The release of the vehicle shall be subject to the condition that
it be repaired and post-repair tested or inspected within fifteen
(IS) calendar days.
NOTE: Authority Cited: Sections 39600. 39601. 43013. and 44011.6 Health
and Safety Code. Reference: Sections 39002. 39003. 39010. 39033. 43000,
43013. 43018, and 44011.6 Health and Safety Code. Section 505 Vehicle Code.
- 13 -
A-55-
-------
ITki
PT
Blaer ^
o
A-56
-------
?5 30
DIESEL EMISSION PHODUCTION AUDIT TEST
PROCEDURE—SAE J1243 AUG79
SAE R*cemm«nd«d Practice
1l fritnvr i*JI AuwiiMi -*»««*¦ iw'u
Pr—ffirr "rl"i VAE ^wornmrfierrl Practice n intended u a euide fnr the
neaiuremeni and ancumrnt of tramirni imnke and ueadv itate saseout
cmuaitm 'mm ncm dutv vehicular dieus1! mrinei <>nK untie a ihimened
entitle Dynamometer o^ic «mch mi> oe Jpulicscle 10 preaucttun tine nr
production auaiuv audit conditions Kft dementi »f ihe pmceourr ctaaels
rnemaie lte\ eiementi n» the Federal Test Pmcrdurr1 uied for regulator*
jppirmi bv the (.mini ")ntr> Gm eminent
5foot— Pie recommences practice appliet in a production avnanumirtcr
mi orocedure which can be used in measure the lmoke and (Wrni ernmion
charactenjitci of vrnicular ateiel fneinet I*hn procedure dcicnbet thr imnfce
emotion int method, urwfce mi cvele. fimui etntBtua icii methud. cueoui
rmioion inr evele eouipment jrutnirnrmaiion. calibration. data analviii.
and correlation of main for romp&n*>t> cl' production enqtne emuuoni
pencnim to iSt Rquirmnii at the feoeial rr^uiai mu.
Virtuiom in rnpne). iiBtrumentai»n, aoo tot equipment nu« require
¦notbfieaiuMB u ihe*e Dreeeouta or dm reduction method. The accrptabil-
;*ol i mi nrocecuR a aepenacni gpon^nnnuH niuumldiaippnipn-
ut n cmtttti »U too. diti mucuon technique*, and (pectai uutrumema-
nan to ihe required Federal tritl.
When uiinr (he audit ten procedure to nam the rmiaiurti performance of
production eneine* ronnrtrrmitorn thwtld be (iven to eipected ria—Anv curaprmjon mnu» mtenuu ctKn-
puuwn ennnc uica to pnipet im-Und. naniiL mntele muniimw
l 1 2 Oiuu. PartKin. includinf arrnnt*. impended in i!ir en.
^net ^ucoui nnum >ire»m «hich ixiicurr. rrrteri anaubalance rrtitltrtj ti> lIv ainuaptiefr ftvr.t anv
openine twnimm inmt «ne rxhauu pt^i >4 anv rneinr ohiih a ama in
n«un when tannt Mtimn
I 1 4 Ratio lun Pottii— TJw nuiitiHini tonkr piiwer nuipui <>f an
cnfine in aiiowaia i Nmnnmi u uatm Ov ihe manufacturer tUE Rrrom.
inenaed Practice Jfllfifa.) (Ret I i
I I i R^no APtcn—The tpeed at which ihe manutariorcr ipcnfie* the
rated bnkr cow nf an mum
] I 6 Pia* Tuatjut Skid—The iptta *i which the engine dewh^a mau-
mum lurque aj nared b» trie manufaciurer
1 1 7 ItTiuiguTi anis-The peak torque speed ur ftn o{ rated «peed.
whichever 11 Richer
I 18 Idi a Swra—The rneinr « iuw idle tpeed u iperthed the manu-
fjcturrr
I 19 Fi.il Ui*o Powia—The pott produced, at the ipurt bewf coraid-
crrd when thr fuel control Inrrl n pJaccd in the maximum fuel pouiion.
1110 Pucwt Lot—The fractiun uf the maairaum iiaillUt torque at
ihat rneine ipeed
1111 Oracmi-Thai fract.on oi li^ht (ranonitied from a lource which u
prevented from reachine the obiermt or instrument rctttwr eaprcaed in
percent itioacn* = ICJtn 11 - trammmanceii
IM2 SMuatOawaHCTu—An optical inummenidrtxncdtetneaiure the
gpacitv of dioet exnaun faac*. The full Ho" «l exhauat naa paiaa ihtouan
ihniotical unn One »uen imi*e noacimeier a deicnbed in nAE Irformaunn
Krpon jJSSa iRef .'I OtherL of the inline t*pe. are available commercial*
I 1 IJ R>sl.i—The diuaacr between tero and full^cale deflection ol the
rraoout device uaed with the tmoke npacitneter
! I 14 Nr«i—The dotance betwren icro and a known uoirale irt point
I I IJ RtVJt iTim-The minimum aatineuithable readme increment tnr i
fivra recorded trace iir icale combination, eiprened at a petcent nf the
recording it-item i full icalc
I I IS IJ Moot—A naenuf emtniom orcle dede of Fedrral
Reeulatkicw T«k ¦W CHawet ?an Hi^Ciintroi of Aw Pnllunon from New
Vlotor Vehtclei ana New Mtuor Vehicle Engine*
1.2 AbbrrMiimt Lied
API —American Petroleum Ituiicuie
ASTM — Amenraji Mricn if Tcaiinf utd Mnenui
bhp(kWl —Brele Honrpewer flilowaiui
BSHC -rBrake Spkiik Hrdmreotii
BSNO, —Brake Specific Viiiuein Oxides
BSCO —Brake Spentc Carton Monomte
8di iBar,i — Dr» Barometnc fnomt. Pa i in He)
•C -Ortrm Cdnua
Chemi —Chemitumirincrni
CO 'Caibuti VlaiiMMe
Cunc — Cuocrnirauon
Curr — Humidii* LwettnA Factur
dB —OecibeU
DB —Or* Bulb Temperature
DIR —Dnpcnivr infra Red
DU\' —Ftiipaini'e Ulira V into
EP —End Po.ru
exh — Eahaou
*F —BumI Fahmthett
FID —Flame fomuimn Dftrtiiir
rA —Trdrral Hrttnrr
ft —Feet
g —Grama
H — Humtcjiv ieraim m' water per puund of drr air*
HC -Hrtroci/woi
H* -Mfmir*
hp — Kanepnwrr
h —Hour
Ht -Hmi
HJ> -IVawr
IBP —Initial Bnkine Pmnt
in — Inchini
IR —Intake Rntnctmn. kPa nn H O)
IRm— — Maaufaciortr i maximum rroirrimended Intake
Kesincimfi kPa nn HOi
VP*. —KiVopaacaV
kW i hp) — Ktlowairi thonepoweri
maa — .Vlaauttum
mtn —Minimum
m i ft i —Meter i feet >
mtn iini —millimeter tinrh)
N flbl —Newton 1 puundi
NDTR — Non-Oupermr Infra Red
MDVV — NorwOooemve Clira Violei
NO —Nunc Oxide
NO, —Oitdet of Mitrneen
ubi —Obieued
Pa —Paacal
ppm —Paru per million ivnlumei
rpm — ftevoliiiiona per minute
i — tecoids
T Nm ilt>*fii —Torque
WB —Wet Bulb Temperature
WF —Weifhiin^ Facton
•< frorrwt RmiMiani T.iU «0 Cluo"r I Pan $i-Comtnt oi Air PoUmho
(ran Ntw M«or VrtMda ana >
-------
31
3.2 fntake air icmoerature ihauld be controlled between 20 and
'O'C (68 and 85" F) Hither air temperatures miT be uwd if dewed,
rut no allowance shall be maoe for pouiule increase® imuif rmuuuni
vcause of such conditions. (See Appetidii A.)
JJ Fuel SpRiflcHiotu
S 3.1 The diesel fuels employed lhall be clean and bright with pour
nd cloud poini adeouate for opera bilnv. The fuel* ma* contain non-
teta/lie adrfftJve* as follows mine improvers. melt) deactivator*. ami-
ndants. dehaier. antiruit. pour depressant. die. and dtspenam.
5 3.2 Fuel meeting the following specifications or substantially equn-
'em ihall be uteu in qua/icv audit testing for exhaust emuiiom from
inel engine). The grade of fuel recommended bv (he engine manufac-
irer for the specific mocrl shall be used for testing, commercially det-
onated ai ASTM 0 975 Trp* I or Tipt Z Following is the A5TM 0
75 tpeafiouon for Tjpt 2 fuel. This fuel shall be satisfactory for most
udit testing.
IM
untw
Tf»»M
Ztmmm.
o aia
40 mm
OK
S«M
mpM '
Gmv
o nr
_»
MU>. *
0 Iff arOWn
Maw
1MktaM. -1
093
1J3 mm
'Sir—i. li mum
e ui
10-tJ
5.3.5 In cases where the manufacturer believes the emnsrjn me of
le engine family is significantly influenced bv fuel characteristics, the
blowing tjrptcai Trpe 2-D fuel blending guidelines' can be uwd to
xcifr fuel for exhaust emission testing.
IMM
una im
T|»lM
Cmmtm.
0 61}
iX4.4f
Mm*
316
m f
M0 • 390
lOftaM. i
410-440
xm —ml. ¦1
300 320
miM. 'i
JK-tfO
¦»
616-644
dm*
0 IZ««
34-36
Tool MrMwrt
Dl» or 0 7621 or 0 4N4
0J .04
Maapo vols
0 1JI9
n-u
WMA -1
o in inches nf water)
Nort Should IR calculate to be a negative number, then the follow,
mf options are available.
5 3.1 Pressurise the intake (combustion) air svsiem
3.3.2 Delay testing until sufficiently high barometric pressure pre-
vitia.
5-5-3 Proceed with test, but recognize (hat the effect will normallv
be to read higher or lower vtlues than would be the case where fail
compliance wtth this section is possible
5-6 Span smokemeter circuit to establish rero and 1003 opacity
values. (Allow fnr the meter circuit to stabilize per manufacturer s in-
unctions.)
5.7 Operate ihr engine m the manner required bv ihe Smoke
unmaon Test Cvcle (Section 61
S. Smote {mninn Tttt Crr/*—Conduct earn imoir emi»«wm ten
ipeeified in Section 5 arcordinr to (he follrming leauenre t«ee Appen-
dix B for tiptral smoke trsi cirle iracr >
6.1 Uigtiosra Mode hen ie*t conditions iSecimn ii are fui
(illed. and with ihe engine ooeranng at full lnad or><»er anrt meo
speed, energize ihe data processing equipment and gncualli change
the dvnamometer load to reduce engine prra to in-
termediate ipeed within 30-40 i Qeeeleratinn aurine thu lnecio«n
mode to be linear within - 100 rpm.
SJ Transitional Mod*—If desired. de-energize riaia prn*r<«ine
equipment after engine reaches intermediate «peea
6 2.1 Remove the load from the engine ana clrse the fur rnntroi If-
ver.
6.2.2 Set preload on drnamomerer a» requirrd tn perfnrm the arcrl-
eration called for in paragraph 6.3.3.
6.2.3 Time tnteml between closing of fuel control leier after lug-
down mode and opening of fuel control leier (paragraph 6 * II for
start of acceleration mode is 30-90 s.
IJ Acceleration Mod*
6.3.1 Energiie the data processing equipment, if needed Ho»r>er
data from the first ride will not be used for data anautis or cm-rela-
tion.
5.3.2 Open the fuel control lever gradualli to cause ihe engine to ac-
celerate smoothly from idle speed to 200 t 30 rpm aoo»e the manufac-
turers recommended idle speed in 3<3 s. then inap ihe furl control le-
ver full open to cause -the engine to accelrratr against the
dynamometer inertia and load (as required)
6.3.3 The acceleration rate must be comrolled bs load and-or iner-
tia adjustment to ensure that the engine accelerate* from 200 - 5(*
rpm above the manufacturers recommended In* idle < been
completed and the engine reaches m maximum ( rpnnng» Ivikrrn nnaci-
meters
'tPA innuilv rusMnhra tfn-ie alrtiding fuidrlmes m I9TT rwned ttirm in
A -59
-------
-!S J'J
7 4 I The >mou uiucinwtcr mini be ol" the continuous reading full
flow »un the fallowing minimum recommended pertortnance
characteristic*. (See \ppenni* H )
7 4 1.1 Calibration accuracy = 15
7 4 1.2 Lineantt = 13 (from tero io 10*2 opacity)
7-t 1.3 Drift = IS »uhin the tempenture range specified by the
manufacturer
7 4.1.4 Response time 0.140 s mas for a change from 09 to 951 of
full scale.
7 4.1.5 Range 0-100? opacity
7 J Smokt opacut and engine speed are to be monitored continu-
al^ using either a itnp chart recorder or other data collection/
p roc cuing equipment that u calibrated to provide the following mini-
mum performance requirement!.
7S.1 Minimum speed range of 13-608 am/min (0.5-20.0 in/
minute).
7 5.2 Maximum iull^uit response time for smoke opacity of 0 5 i.
7 3.3 An automatic marker indicating 1 0 > interval* to verify chart
•peed u desirable.
7 5.4 The tarious components. opacuneter. electronic filter*. and re-
corder mould compruc a »yucm capable of data output within me fol-
lowing limn*.
7 3.4.1 The tmuic ouacut iricr a iu be linear when calibrated or
corrected to read from G-JO't upacuy. The trace should have i: reiolu-
lion witnin I « of full-scale running.
7 5.4 2 The cngtnr meed trace is iu be linear when calibrated to
rcaa from inc low tale ipera to rated engine ipeed. The trace mould
hate a resolution wunin 30 rpm of rated engine ipted.
7 5 4.3 The chart lucrtl used to record unoke upacuy during the
lugdown ana acceleration mode* muu provide a lime resoluiiau of 0.50
i.
7 3.5 The uw of general tnurumcniation for measuring engine
ipeed. power. uilet air restriction. exhauu back presiu-e, inlet air tem-
perature and humidit). barometric pressure, pmuire. and temperature
measurement* while performing inu rrquirrti in thti subpart should be
of sufficient accuracy to enure that the iihiU iru retulu are not af-
fected bv theae component* iSAE J1349) (Kef. 7), defines inurnment
ccuracy
7.5.6 A iqiinit Jot>-pa*» ilrctronic tiller with the following per-
onnance dumunuia mav be installed between the smoke opao-
meter and the recorder to achieve high frequency attenuation?.
7 5.0 I Three Oectbela puuu—10 Ht
7 3 6.2 Insertion low—0 z 0.5 dB.
7 5 63 Selectiviit—12 dB per octave above 10 Ha.
7 5 6 4 \iteiiuaiuni—27 dB down at 40 Hi nun.
J. 5aaim itaiani; Syutm ColAruwi
S.1 The lero and lOOt tettings of the output from the data pro
cuing eqtupmrm snould be imlied at the beginning and cuttcluvon
i each complete ocle. A span or" iero ihift of the unokemeter required check* lor linearu) bet»em zero and
lOU'i opacut should be conducted using calibrated neutral demny fil-
ler* at specified opacut levels. Ant devotion in eicni of 17 opacity
iouU be correvted ui ihe range from 0-505 opacity. (See Appendix
and C lor Calibration Procedure*.)
U If an alternative dau processing system per paragraph 73 a
uiilucd. penodic check* lor currelation wuh a conventional unp chart
vorder ihoula be made a* experience leetn* necessary to eiuurc and
cord the accuracy oi the entire system.
'• fwini* Oaim Ammiytii Hie following procedure n for
u>e kith data returned bt a >irip chart recorder or equivalent. It is per-
missible to uiuue an integrating recorder or data prucnauig equipment
at can be demonstrated to tteld equitaleni result*.
9.1 Locate ihe turt of the lugdown mode (paragraph o 1) on the
erd trace The lugdown mude turn ohen the engine ipeed a 50 rpm
below rated tueed and rudt »hrn the engine speed is at the intcrmedi-
"e ipeed Divide the lugdown mode into 0.5 i interval* and determine
e aterage smoke reading during each 0.5 s interval*.
9 I I Locate and record the lite highest 0 5 i interval* during the
_jdown mode '1 he average of these fite reading* n the lugdown
tmuU uiur
9.2 Li«ate me ecnnd acceleration cvclc (paragraph
Ji on ihe tpeed irj« I hr tiru aiceleration mode uan* when the en-
¦e ipert it raited abote ihe Hilr speed (paragraph 6 J.2). Divide the
acceleration mode* (paragraph* 6.3 and 6.5) into 0.3 I interval* and de-
termine the avenge unoke reading during each 0.5 i interval.
9.2.1 Locale and record the fifteen highest 0.5 * interval* during the
acceleration mooes. The average of that fifteen readings ts the iccet-
erauon imou value. (An alternate number of interval* may be used for
cormatioa wuh the Federal Procedure, lee Section 10.)
9.2.2 If a third acceleration cycle (paragraph 6 5) «u run. repeat
paragraph* 9.2 and 9.2.1 for the third acceleration mode. The average
of the acceleration unoke values for the two cycles a the acceleration
value.
9J Re-examine the 0.3 * interval* of paragraph* 9.1 and 9.2. The
average of the inrce highest 0 J i interval! represent! the peak unoae
value.
10. Conlaon tf Smtkt Mmmi—ii The successful applicauoa
of ihu procedure implies confidence that values obtained will correlate
welt with results obtained from the Federal Test Procedure uung the
prescribed unoketneter. in order to achieve such a confidence level, it
u necessary that the manufacturer conduct tuch test* as mav be re-
quired. wuh freeoom to apply correction factors a* needed to obtain
good correlation. Specific recommendation* in thi* regard are a* fol-
low*:
10.1 The numhrr of 0 J * interval* analyzed under paragraph 6.t
of this procedure tnay be modified to luw ut acceptable corrttauoo
depending upon the particular manufacturer'* need*.
IU Correcuon for aack sue difference and spectral iespon*e dtf-
ferenee between equipment used in thts procedure and in the method
prescribed by the United States Government for ceruficauuo purposes
mutt be determined by the manufacturer*. SAC J35 (Ref. I), contains
method* under Section 9 for correiauoo tests.
IU The use of legrcmou analysts, baaed upon test data. » recom-
mended for establishing satisfactory corretauon between the manufac-
turer's smoke emnimn test procedure and the Federal Smoke Test Pro-
cedure.
10.4 Gorreiattea oi Smoke Cycle Opacity Monimnu
10.4.1 Baci-«o-back short cycle and Federal test results (on the same
engine) should agree within;
x2.0% opacity e unoke (acceleration)
X US epacay * imnkr (lug)
x3.0% opacity c smoke (peak)
A common factor betwttn the two types of testa may be applied to
the data pnor to correlation calculations.
10.4.2 Acceptable short cycle schedule* will have correlation coeffi-
cients of 0.9 or better. If the avenge rmimnn level of the population
with 90% confidence lies 3 standard deviations below the applicable
standard, a correlation coefficient of 0.75 or greater is acceptable.-
10.4.3 Acceptable short cycle schedules will identify deviant citgiaci
at well a* nominal engine*.
11. Ciwii Emutmm Tut MftW
11.1 Before commencing the test cycle, the engine u to have met
the manufacturer's production icu speaftcauotu. Ail test uistrumemi
shall be wanned up and readied (per manufacturer'* recommendations)
including, but not limited to.
1. Zero check*.
2. Spaa check* on all range* scheduled.
3. Flow checks/presiure checks for tero. span, and sample gun.
Ili Intake air tempenture between 20 and 30'C (68 and 86*F)
is recommended. Higher air temperatures may be used. (Refer to para-
graph It A.)
11J The fuel specifications oi paragraph 5 3 apply.
11.4 The canaust back-preswre requirement* of paragraph 5.4 ap-
p'r-
1IJ The intake air restnetion requirement! of paragraph i i ip-
piy-
11-5 Span the instrument*. With the engine wanned up and all the
•est equipment readied and at the proper openting tempenture*. tero
and *pan the initnitncnu. The span gaates) should be selected in accor-
dance wuh the manufacturer * and the full tcafe nt-
ue of the tnsirumem ranged*) to be utibaed. Full icaie values shall be se-
lected so that the expected cnusuon values shall fall in the 15-100*
range of the instrument*. The analyzer'* response may be less than
15% of full scale if:
(a) The full scale value u 120 ppm or leis.
(b) The full scale value t* 5500 ppm or lei* for CO analyu*.
(c) The cminiuiit from the engine are erratic and the average chan-
dr fleet ton value a greater than 153 of full scale.
(d) The contribution oi all modes read below ihe 133 letei a lest
than 105 by mass of the final test results. Tin no case shall eapectfrf
values exceed 1003 full scale.
A-S1
-------
11.7 ODerate the engine m accordance with either the 13 mode
emissions cvtie (Section J 2) and/or ihe manu/aciurrr j jhort cycle
etnnnora icnedutc (Section 12).
12. C*t—n$ {«umi Tnt Cycin
12.1 The gueout ennsnom Ten Cycle thill consist of 1-13 iteadv
tute mooes of engine operation run at various revotuoom per minute
ana percent! of full load torque.
IU The IS Mode cycle ihall be run to the following schedule:
I«|MImM tHip
nui i u— a r»
t
UaM
OtaMMOuM
3
30
3
UjO
4
hMwwatfaM iommd
JOO
9
710
6
hMnrfM floaari
I0U
7
DteMMOM
8
RMad laaad
1000
»
Igari
710
10
Joaatf
SOLO
II
barf IpmS
11
7.0
1]
1
1
1
O
IU The N-Mtdt. SXort CycU test shall corns of thaw made* (se-
lected from the 13-Mode schedule) that enable* an estimation of 15-
Mode test values in accordance with the limits specified in Section 17.
IK TUna of Teat
J2.4.I The stabilization time shall be 2-10 mm. The gaseous m»
nom shall be sampled for a 30-s period.
12 4.2 Mode 1. Mode 7. and Mode 8 (if pieieded by Mode 7) shall
hiic a minimum duration of 5 mm.
13. Comb Emimmu Mtmtfing Epupmtmt and /sUia—C
Mm—The following equipment and instrumental ton is required to
conduct the gaseous emission test:
13.1 An engine dynamometer with adequate characteristics to per-
form the testa required by the test method.
13J An air intake system of piupet diameter and suitable length
Tor the engine bemg tested, with provisions for adjusting restriction to
enable compliance with paragraph 9 J.
13J An exhaust system of the piupct diameter and tunable length
for the engine being tested. The i/sicui must be adequate to impose a
tnci-pressure withm the hmtts specified under paragraph 5.4.
13.4 An uuuumeiu for the continuous measurement of the hydnv
carton iximeiiuauun in diuel exhaust.
13.4.1 The instrument^) ihould mm those specifications pres-
ented in SAE J215 (Ref. 3).
13^2 Alternate instruments ma* be used if correiaiMn is available
•nth those msmimenu aireadv recognised as mceung the proper speci-
fications.
1SJ Instruments) for the contmtsoua measurement of carbon
monoaide (CO) and oxide* of nitrogen (NO. ) in diesei exhaust.
1SJ.1 The mstrumentls) should meet those specifications pres-
ented in SAE J177 APR 82 (Ref. 2).
I1U Alternate instruments ma* be used if tuiielatwm is available
with those timrumenta already muginied as meeting the proper tpeei-
fcauons.
IU HC. CO. and NO ernnsnm value* are to be monnmed duraig
each mode of in iminssi test, using either a strip chart recorder or
other dau collection/pi unsung equipment that is calibrated to pro
ride equivalent results.
The following are mummim performance lequiianwus for a strip
than ncoidei.
13.5.1 Minimum speed range of 13-508 mm/minute (0 3-20 in/
imitate).
13.8.2 Maximum full-scale icsputise time of 0.3 s.
13.0 J Accuracy of * 0.23%.
13.8.4 Linearity of 0.1%.
* 13.7 The use of general instrumentation for measuinig engine
tpeed. power. inlet sir lesuiction. exhaust hack piesnire. inlet atr tem-
perature and humidity, barometric prewar*, pressure, and temperature
measurements while pei funning testa requued m this part should be of
ujiTiciem accuracv to ensure that the gaseous emiwon test results are
not affected bv these components. (SAE J1349 define* instrument acru-
rae».) (Ref. 7.)
14. Goaaaaa Emiimam Mwini Syitam CmUtimlUm
14.1 Check each da* for teaka in the samole line cannet.tuins.
14-1 A tero and spaa cheek of the HC. COjind NO anahners
ihould be done as nften as necessary to ensure that dnft n less than
i 1%.
14 J Check ihe samei - gai fin* rate during each mode to emure
proper flow
14.4 Mnnthlv check of anaiwen at outlined in S\E J177s (Ref !»
and J2I5 (Ref 3), to ensure mat ihe equipment i» meeting «pe-
lions.
14.5 MonthIv check of ail equipment related to Section 13 to en-
sure that the emtsstom lev n not adter*en afTected b\ ihe«e comoo-
nents.
IS. Cimsi £aimn Data A irnimi
IS.1 Locate or record (he lass 30 > of each mode and determine
the average reading for HC. CO. and NO.
ISJ Determine the concentration of HC. CO. and SO. during
each mode from the average reading and cnrre«pnndtng calibration
data.
ISJ Determine the exhaust gas mas«-flo« rate for rach mode ac-
cording to the SAE J244 (Ref. 4)
15.4 Convert the measured CO and NO, concentrations to a »et
basis according (o Section 4 and paragraph 5 4 of S\E J 177a (Ref 2)
ISJ Multiplt the »et S'O, taiue* bv the following humiditx cor-
rection faaor
I
I + A
-------
34
lo i 2 1 Rcucat the abase CilcuUuom ciicepi combine the ben
;le moac predictor min eacn of ine remaining mode* to farm X +
.miuion*. CiUruUic i he bm Double mode predictor for each consul*
a Repeat lor three ana four moon, but Utile improvement is iisuai-
. leeti bnond four.
16.3 2 6 Select and ten ihe N-Mode Short Cycle that mou accu-
el> prroicu tnc 13-Mode reutu i'or all constituents.
16.4 The rnuni of the I J-Mode aiu J van should be used to guide
rveioomem ot the .VModf Shon Cvcie. To tell iu accuracy. run a ie-
- - of 13-Mode ana .S-Mooc Short Ctcle inu bul-to^aci. it map be
od thai the scaling factor calculated bv dividing the IS-Mode test by
VUode ten ma> be slightly different from that calculated by the
j-.ilode aiuiiu.
!J. C&rrwiattsm mf Gmtr— £iumi Jdsmiurwmnu
17.1 ftack-tooack Federal and Shon Cycle results on the ant en-
r thouU agree kiimn:
r 0 25 g/bhp-h for HC
r 0 75 g/bhp-h for NO
x 08 g/bhp-h tor HC + NO,
: 03 g/bhp-h for CO
urrection factor bttxaii tne two types of ceua may be applied to
-------
\m\ni\ b
FIG. M — Smoke Tm Cicle
SoM
LawMlt
. no
Laltt I _
oeccmo
appendix c
I. 1Mb Opmwnr liutailstiim tW *f limm—The smoke opact-
:rter tntulltuon ihoutd be u failowt:
I 1 The engine exhaust irstem shall be of circular cross section
nd be free of elbow* and bends in the terminal 610 mm (2 ft) The
nd of (he exhaust pipe shall be cut ofT square and hive a diameter in
rctmtajice with the engine being tested, u specified below:
I
1
1
IMS li (1011
il WIIH
7s.i49iigi-xa
Jtmmiimt
iso-n< noi-xx»
IUhNM
R3 OOII K>
1.1 The oaacmteter onto! unit nw be mounted on > fixed or
lovable frame The normal unrestricted shaoe of the exhaust piumr
nil not be modified b* the adapter, the meter, or anr vermlatton irv
¦m used to icwme the ntiiiat from the ten utr.
I 3 The opucaj unit of the opKimeter ihall be mounted radtalir
i the exhaust oipe *o that the measurement mil be made at right in-
« to the aait of the exhaust plume
1.4 The opactmeter should be located at the termination of the ex-
Jitst suck with the light beam of the opacimeter 127 ±25 mm (3 ± 1
i> from the luck tctmuutton point.
I 5 The full flow of the exhaust stream shall be centered between
ie source and detector toertures and on the axis nf the light beam
APPENDIX D
!¦ Smmim Opmawmwr fnjtaliultn—Iniim* Typt—The imnke opari-
.ner mar be installed as fallows:
I I The sensor mar be installed in an* povtton in the exhaust cvs-
m and should be located 45 ; 3 m (15 s 10 fi> frrrm the engine
I 2 Exhaust sis temoentures and amhirni trmpenturn should
«tC0«0
I 3 Temperature of coolinc water (if u«edl for tiabiliratmn of the
electron us should be is per manufacturer i rrrnrnmenaatinm
I 4 Opacimeter to be installed with a minimum of iwn p>oe di-
ameter* straifht section utntrram from the mnrr
I 3 Inlet pipe to ooacimeter to be umt mode diameter at noao-
meter for a minimum lenvth of two <21 pipe diameter*
1.6 Fronde a source of clean drr lahnntnri air it ihe npjcimeteT
which is free of dust and oil and at the premire nf fin* rue «chednled
by the manufacturer of the npacimrter
1.7 The exhaust svitem must be raoable nf beirt* adjusted to meet
ihe exhaust back pwiiure required for the imoke tr»t A butterfh
valve or other mean* of increasing the ethsttut «uem bark pre«ure
ma* be placed on the ethauu pipe but ai lr»«i three diameter* frnm
the ooacimeter
APPENDIX C
i. Onat fiAamif i^tfnu—IT dual rthauM oiticm* are vi«rd fcr t>tt>
duel ion testing of Vee entires
I 1 Exhaust stack diameter shall be determined »• m *oprwii C
with toiai engine power dmded equalli between both rihau«t <\th ihe fnllnxint
procedure*'
l-t Clean the optical «
-------
21.36
I -i Check, me linearity of the iiiunmuni »u« calibrated neutral
aensut filien ruving approximately 10. 20. ana 40% opacity. (he nomi-
nal filter ooaai> to be confirmed bv a source traceable to the National
Bureau at Stani*rrlt Filien mail be caubraica annually.
1 i Deviation! of recoraer and/or meter response tn excess of I SB.
of (he nominal filtent) opacity shall be corrccietl.
APPENDIX C
1. CililraMi i«lm Smoit Oftinwnif "Pie imou
ooacimcter calibrauon should be checked with the following proce-
dure:
I 1 Clean the optical surfaces to remove the foreign matertal and
finger print*.
1.2 Adjust the inurumciu com rob for ur» and 100% opaatx1
I 3 lnten calibrated neutral density filteru)' >n the opaameter
light path halfway between the cornier and rccener with the filter cen-
tered ana perpenaicular to the axis of the beam.
J 4 Check the linearity of the instrument with calibrated neutral
density tilien uut have approximately 10, 20. and 40S opsxuy. The
nominal filter opacuv to be confirmed by a source traceable to the Na-
tional Bureau of Standard*. Filien ihall be calibrated annuaily.
1 i Deviation* of recorder and/or meter retpotus ui ex xu of IX
of ihe nominal filierls) opacttv thall be corrected.
I 6 \n alternate method to verify and/or adiuu for ur» smoke
«ith the engine operating u to monuor and adjust during an engine de-
celeration with governor control lever tn the fuel off position. It should
be verified thai tne engine has no comouiuoa during acceleration.
1 7 A calibration fixture may alto be used to check the calibration
of the inline opaameter. The fixture ihall locate the letuor mount* in
ihe same relationship to one another as they are on the meter Boar
The holder for the calibration filtent) thall be centered between tne
mourns and perpend Millar to the axia of the light beam. The calibra-
tion procedure outline in step* 1.1-1 6 shall be used.
APPENDIX H
^ifiaiiir Comimnn—Qpacuneters commercially available are
taned and no one type of meter is beat for all manufacturers. Opto-
meters currently available for both suumuu and transmit smoke
toting are;
1.1 Public Health Service Meter Bade by bbdlp] ih* Uftu
bna iron in* mum mutt noa transparent ouunal.
1 Slides wioukl be calibrated —— "r u iM craur aa ihe sane »*«• Wnfih
*> lAa iigoi mure*
DIESEL ENGINE SMOKE MEASUREMENT—SAE J255o
SAE Information Report
i |«<* I •»
Mr4««uriiiriit *+ *u«i
td vihwi |N^iinn l«* rti^iur iua trhnlr m^nuUtiyrrn
dita i»!rn»in %u«4r lintm .Snrfjl imiruairnit.
«au Uiiirrrni (tiiiii ^imJ itmt< uufrrrm « *ir» dir imnmunit ami |u
hutuu |uiJ«istrm *tr irtirn um rrUuc
«nu4r t«> s iri iijiuiiiUi
I lir fMijiiAr <4 «lih rrf*«i h «i |»o«Mir jn umlrnirfiHltiMi irt ilie njiurr
dtctri turn u «!* u» Mi*i\ \4rMMk >tk|ircu the mhwri
A-6i
-------
rTh<$ & bi«*i
k-(A
-------
State of California
AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Resolution 90-64
November 8, 1990
Agenda Item No.: 90-18-2
WHEREAS, Sections 39600 and 39601 of the Health and Safety Code authorize
the Air Resources Board (the "Board") to adopt standards, rules and
regulations necessary for the proper execution of the powers and duties
granted to and imposed upon the Board by law;
VWEREAS, in Section 43000 of the Health and Safety Code, the Legislature has
declared that the emission of air pollutants from motor vehicles is the
primary cause of air pollution in many parts of the state and, in Sections
3S002 and 39003 of the Health and Safety Code, has charged the Board with
the responsibility of systematically attacking the serious air pollution
problem caused by motor vehicles;
WHEREAS, in Section 43000.5, the legislature has declared that ths burden
for achieving needed reductions 1n vehicle missions should be distributed
equitably among various classes of vehicles, including heavy-duty vehicles,
to accomplish improvements 1n both ths emissions level and in-use
performance;
WHEREAS, Section 43013 of the Health and Safety Code authorizes the Board to
adopt in-use performance standards and regulations to control air pollution
from motor vehicles, which the Board has found to be necessary, cost-
effective, and technologically feasible;
WHEREAS, Sactlon 43018 of the Health and Safety Code directs the Board to
endeavor to achieve the maximum degree of emission reduction from vehicular
sources to accomplish the attainment of State ambient air quality standards
by the earliest practicable data through achieving the maximum feasible
reductions in mobile source emissions, including particulates;
WHEREAS, Section 44011.6 of the Health and Safety Code directs the Board to
develop, as expeditiously as possible, a test procedure for the detection of
excessive smoke emissions from heavy-duty dlesel motor vehicles and visual
or functional Inspection procedures to determine the presence of tampering
or defective emissions control systems 1n h»*vy-duty dlesel- or gasoline-
powered motor vehicles and to prohibit the use of these vehicles until such
time as the owner corrects every specified deficiency;
WHEREAS. Sactlon 44011.6 of the Health and Safety Code directs the Board to
prohibit by regulation the use in California of heavy-duty motor vehicles
which are determined to have excessive seeke emissions or other emission-
related defects;
bifi
-------
Resolution 90-64
-2-
WHEREAS, Section 44011.6 of the Health and Safety Code authorizes the Board
to cite owners of motor vehicles who violate regulations adopted pursuant to
that Section;
WHEREAS, owners of motor vehicles who are cited may be liable for a civil
penalty of not more than fifteen hundred dollars ($1500) per day for each
day that the vehicle is in violation or a lesser amount for expeditious
correction of violations;
WHEREAS, Section 44011.6 of the Health and Safety Code further requires an
additional three hundred dollar ($300) penalty to be deposited 1n the Olesel
Emissions Reduction Fund for each citation that is Issued with the exception
of school buses cited for the first time;
WHEREAS, the staff has proposed the addition of Sections 2180 through 2187
to Title 13, California Code of Regulations to implement the excessive smoke
emissions test procedure and emission control systems inspections of heavy-
duty commercial motor vehicles;
WHEREAS, the regulations proposed by the staff set forth the
responsibilities of the driver and Inspector, the heavy-duty diesel vehicle
smoke opacity test procedure, the opacity standards for the smoke opacity
test, emission control system inspection procedures for heavy-duty diesel
and gasoline-powered vehicles, refusal to submit to the test procedure
inspection constitutes a violation of the regulations, procedures for
clearing citations through demonstration of correction or post-repair test
Inspections, and procedures for the release of vehicles removed from
service;
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act and Board regulations
require that no project which may have significant adverse environmental
impacts be adopted as originally proposed 1f feasible alternative or
mitigation measures are available to reduce or eliminate such impacts;
WHEREAS, a public hearing and other administrative proceedings have been
held 1n accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3.S (commencing with
Section 11340), Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code;
WHEREAS, the Board finds that;
Excessive smoke emissions from heavy-duty diesel powered
motor vehicles contribute significantly to the serious
air pollution problem 1n this state;
Particulates from excessive heavy-duty diesel powered
motor vehicles are a significant source of air
contaminants;
Attainment of the State ambient air quality standards
cannot be accomplished by the earliest practicable date
without reduction of excessive heavy-duty diesel
vehicles smoke emissions;
Effective 1n-use inspection and maintenance programs
presently do not exist In the State for heavy-duty
diesel-powered vehicles;
A-a
-------
Resolution 90-64
-3-
A test procedure for detection of excessive smolce
emissions from heavy-duty diesel motor vehicles end air
emission control system inspection for diesel- and
gasoline-powered heavy-duty vehicles can contribute to a
significant reduction in air pollution in this state;
Smoke emissions of forty percent (40*) or higher from
heavy-duty diesel vehicles certified at a level of
thirty-five (35) percent peak opacity or less and
operating on the highways within the State of California
are excessive;
Smoke emissions of fifty-five percent (551) or higher
from other heavy-duty diesel vehicle operating on the
highways within the State of California are excessive:
It Is necessary to require heavy-duty diesel engine
manufacturers to submit engine identification and smolce
certification data for engines certified to levels above
thirty-five (351) percent peak opacity;
It is further necessary for the effective enforcement of
the proposed program to require that refusal by a driver
or owner to submit to the test or Inspection procedures
constitutes a violation of the test or Inspection
procedure;
The redueed penalty schedule should encourage correction
of violations In an expeditious manner;
A phase-in of the penalty schedule for those found to be
in violation of the regulations but who make every
effort to expeditiously repair their vehicle during the
initial yeer of the program's operation permits an
equitable period of adjustment to the program's
requirements and achievement of air quality benefits;
and
It 1s necessary and appropriate to adopt the proposed
regulations 1n order to fulfill the mandates of Health
and Safety Code Section 44011.6.
WHEREAS, The Board further finds that adoption of the regulations set forth
In Attachment A will not have a significant adverse environmental Impact and
may have a significant beneficial Impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board hereby approves Sections 2180
through 2187, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, as set forth in
Attachment A hereto.
3E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs the Executive Officer to adopt
Sections 2180 through 2187, Title 13, California Code of Regulations, as set
forth in Attachment A, after making them available to the public for a
period of 15 days, provided that the Executive Officer shall consider such
-------
Resolution 90-64
-4-
wntten comments as may be submitted during this period, shall make
modifications as may be appropriate in light of the comments received, and
shall present the regulation to the Board for further consideration if he
determines that this is warranted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby determines that the regulations
approved herein will not cause the California emission standards, in the
aggregate, to be less protective of public health and welfare than
applicable federal standards, will not cause the California requirements to
be inconsistent with Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, and raise no new
issues affecting previous waiver determinations of the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 209(b) of the Clean Air
Act.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Officer shall. If necessary,
forward the adopted regulations to the Environmental Protection Agency with
a request for confirmation that the proposed regulations are within the
seooe of an existing waiver of preemption pursuant to Section 209(b) of the
Clean Air Act, as appropriate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Officer shall, at the end of the
initial year of the program's operation, provide a report to the Board on
the status of the program's enforcement effectiveness.
I hereby certify that the above
1s a true and correct copy of
Resolution 90-64, as adopted by
the Air Resources Board.
-------
APPENDIX B
TRANSIENT TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D NONROAD ENGINE
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRAMS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JIM039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CTCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TC3 RON
ME 51 1(92 TIKE 9:15
COHPUTER PROGRAH HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART I
DIESEL 2D EH-I392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.2 MH BG (29.22 IN EG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 77.0 F RH 60.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.1 G/KG
Afl 85.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.2 C (59.3 F)
I 77.5 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.006
DRY-TO-BET C.F. .978
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYN?
LAHF
LAF
NYNT
TIME SECONDS
295.1
300.0
304.9
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.51 (1148.1)
32.51 (1148.0)
32.44 (1145.4)
32.53 (1148.7)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCMM (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.2 ( 5656.)
162.8 ( 5750.)
165.1 ( 5831.)
166.1 ( 5866.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
10.7/ 43/ 21.53
14.9/ 43/ 30.01
16.8/ 43/ 33.92
9.8/ 43/ 19.72
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
2.1/ 43/ 4.22
2.7/ 43/ 5.42
2.8/ 43/ 5.62
2.8/ 43/ 5.62
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
43.7/ 13/ 40.54
31.3/ 131 28.51
32.3/ 13/ 29.47
24.91 13/ 22.48
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 13/ .26
.3/ 13/ .26
.2/ 13/ .17
.1/ 13/ .09
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
41.1/ 11/ .2999
44.0/ 11/ .3267
71.7/ 11/ .6299
36.5/ 11/ .2591
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
11.1/ 11/ .0675
11.4/ 11/ .0694
11.5/ 11/ .0701
12.4/ 11/ .0760
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (»)
1.1/ 43/ 23.37
1.3/ 43/ 26.30
2.9/ 43/ 60.81
.9/ 43/ 19.56
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 21 .31
.3/ 2/ .31
.3/ 2/ .31
.6/ 2/ .62
DILUTION FACTOR
43.79
40.30
21.06
50.90
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
17.41
24.72
28.57
14.21
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
39.28
27.54
28.38
21.85
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2340
.2590
.5631
.1846
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
23.07
26.00
60.51
18.95
HC MASSGRAHS
1.602
2.313
2.710
1.356
CO MASSGRAHS
7.325
5.220
5.456
4.226
C02 MASS GRAMS
685.67
771.63
1701.24
561.00
NOX MASS GRAMS
7.112
8.148
19.233
6.060
FOEL KG |LB)
.221 ( .49)
.247 ( .55)
.540 ( 1.19)
.180 ( .40)
KW HR (HP HR)
.53 ( .71)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 ( 2.73)
.50 ( .67)
TOTAL RES3LTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.119 ( 1.580) ( 1.58) (COST)
90 KM FILTER NUMBERS P90-13 P90-14
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
5.903 ( 4.402) ( 4.40)
90 MH FILTER WT. GAINS (NG) i
6.178 .285
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
10.769 (
8.030) ( 8.03) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
3.906
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.037 (
.773) ( .77)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.315 (
.519)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.77 (
5.05)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
988. (
737.)
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE HUNBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4Q39D
ENGINE 3.9 LI239. CID} 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH2 RON
DATE 5/1/92 TIME 10:35
COMPUTER PROGRAH HOT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.4 MM HG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.7 C (80.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.8 G/KG
AH 81.5 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 16.2 C (61.1 F)
! 82.7 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.020
DRY-TO-KT! C.F. .979
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LAHF
LAF
NYNF
THE SECONDS
295.5
300.0
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.57 (1149.9)
32.03 (1130.9)
32.60 (1151.2)
32.61 (1151.5)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.06 ( 1.96)
.06 ( 1.96)
.06 ( 1.96)
.06 ( 1.96)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. ADX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.7 ( 5673.)
160.4 ( 5665.)
166.0 ( 5862.)
166.5 ( 5881.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
19.9/ 42/ 19.95
28.5/ 42/ 28.54
34.0/ 42/ 34.08
19.9/ 42/ 19.93
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
8.5/ 42/ 8.51
6.6/ 42/ 6.61
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
5.9/ 42/ 5.91
CO SAMPLE HETER/RABGE/PPH
20.1/ 13/ 18.02
20.5/ 13/ 18.39
26.1/ 13/ 23.60
15.2/ 13/ 13.54
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 13/ .09
.1/ 13/ .09
.0/ 13/ .00
.0/ 13/ .00
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
32.9/ 11/ .2285
40.8/ 11/ .2972
55.8/ 11/ .5574
33.6/ 11/ .2344
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
10.6/ 11/ .0642
10.2/ 11/ .0617
10.0/ 11/ .0604
10.2/ 11/ .0617
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.0/ 43/ 19.59
1.2/ 43/ 25.19
2.9/ 43/ 60.49
.9/ 43/ 18.49
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 2/ .21
.2/ 2/ .21
.2/ 2/ .21
.3/ 2/ .31
DILUTION FACTOR
57.69
44.39
23.80
56.38
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
11.59
22.09
28.32
14.13
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
17.52
17.85
22.90
13.22
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1654
.2369
.4996
.1738
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
19.39
24.99
60.29
18.18
HC KASS GRAMS
1.070
2.035
2.701
1.352
CO HASS GRAMS
3.276
3.334
4.426
2.563
C02 HASS GRAMS
486.09
695.29
1517.22
529.50
NOX HASS GRAMS
6.077
7.822
19.530
5.909
FUEL KG (LB)
.155 ( .34)
.222 ( .49)
.482 ( 1.06)
.169 ( .37)
KW HR (HP HR)
.48 ( .65)
.69 ( .93)
2.03 ( 2.72)
.49 ( .66)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.936 ( 1.443)
(
1.44)
(COHT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-17 P90-18
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
3.677 ( 2.742)
(
2.74)
90 MM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 4.100 .210
BSBOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
10.636 ( 7.931)
(
7.93)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST 2.530
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.684 ( .510)
(
•51)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP QR)
.278 ( .457)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
3.70 ( 4.96)
BS002
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
873. ( 651.)
B-A
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
EHGIKE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIEStt
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TH3 RON
DATE 5/ 1/92 TIHE 11:15
COHPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
ECR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.7 MM HG (29.24 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.7 C (80.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 81.5 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.9 G/KG ( 76.0 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.9 C (58.8 F)
»0i HUMIDITY C.F. 1.003
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAP
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.2
300.0
305.1
306.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.57 (1150.0)
32.57 (1150.0)
32.55 (1149.2)
32.88 (1161.1)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.06 ( 1.95)
.06 ( 1.95)
.06 ( 1.95)
.06 ( 1.95)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRESfSCF)
160.5 ( 5668.)
163.1 ( 5760.)
165.8 ( 5854.)
168.0 ( 5931.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RABGE/PPH
18.0/ 42/ 17.97
27.6/ 42/ 27.63
33.4/ 42/ 33.41
20.0/ 42/ 20.02
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
7.0/ 42/ 7.01
8.3/ 42/ 8.31
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
8.0/ 42/ 8.01
CO SAMPLE HETER/RABGE/PPH
18.0/ 13/ 16.09
20.1/ 13/ 18.02
29.9/ 13/ 27.18
16.6/ 13/ 14.81
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
.3/ 13/ .26
.4/ 13/ .35
1.0/ 13/ .87
.5/ 13/ .44
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
33.9/ 11/ .2369
40.2/ 11/ .2918
69.0/ 11/ .5961
33.2/ 11/ .2310
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
9.6/ 11/ .0578
9.5/ 11/ .0572
9.9/ 11/ .0597
9.6/ 11/ .0578
NOI SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.88
1.2/ 43/ 24.70
2.8/ 43/ 60.19
.9/ 43/ 18.55
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 2/ .21
.1/ 2/ .10
.2/ 2/ .21
.3/ 2/ .31
DILUTION FACTOR
55.77
45.23
22.25
57.15
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
11.09
19.51
27.67
12.15
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
15.46
17.24
25.54
14.04
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1801
.2358
.5391
.1742
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
18.68
24.60
59.99
18.24
HC HASS GRAMS
1.023
1.828
2.635
1.173
CO MASS GRAMS
2.889
3.275
4.928
2.747
C02 HASS GRAHS
528.83
703.81
1634.88
535.32
NOX HASS GRAHS
5.748
7.694
19.069
5.876
FUEL KG (LB)
.169 ( .37)
.225 ( .50)
.519 ( 1.14)
.171 ( .38)
KW HR (HP HR)
.49 ( .66)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 ( 2.73)
.48 ( .65)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR}
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.793 ( 1.337) ( 1.34)
3.727 ( 2.779) (
10.337 ( 7.708) (
.679 ( .506)
.292 ( .479)
3.71 ( 4.98)
916. ( 683.)
(COHT)
78)
( 7.71) (CONT)
( .51)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-19 P90-20
90 KH FILTER WT. GAINS (MG) 3.991 .261
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST 2.520
B~ 3
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COMPOSITE
PROJECT NO. 03-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH2 RUN
DATE 5/ 1/92 TIHE 10:35
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D
HCR 1.80
EH-1392-F
BAROMETER 742.4 HH BG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.7 C (80.0)
CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 81.5 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.8 G/KG ( 82.7 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 16.2 C (61.1 F)
NOX HUHIDITY C.F. 1.020
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLD AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP
HR)
1.962 I
I 1-463) (
1.46)
BSFC G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.283 ( .466)
BSCO
G/KW
HE
(G/HP
HR)
4.000 I
I 2.983) (
2.98)
BSC02 G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
889. ( 663.)
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP
HR)
10.655 I
I 7.946) (
7.95)
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP
HR)
.735 (
: -548) (
.55)
B-4
-------
ENGINE EHISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUKBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1*4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TC4 RON
DATE 5/4/92 TIME 9:15
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
EAROHETER 742.4 HH HG (29.23 IN EG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 24.4 C (76.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 73.0 F RH 58.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.2 G/KG
AH 71.6 GR/LB ENGINE DEM PT. 15.3 C (59.6 F)
(78.3 GR/LB) HOX KUHIDITY C.F. 1.009
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .981
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
HYNF
LANF
LAP
NYNF
TIME SECONDS
295.8
300.0
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.56 (1149.6)
32.59 (1150.7)
32.50 (1147.7)
32.60 (1150.9)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
.06 ( 1.99)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 f .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.8 ( 5677.)
163.2 ( 5763.)
165.5 ( 5844.)
166.5 ( 5878.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.5/ 43/ 23.25
15.4/ 43/ 31.08
16.9/ 43/ 34.10
10.1/ 43/ 20.29
EC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.1/ 43/ 6.23
2.9/ 43/ 5.82
2.9/ 43/ 5.82
2.7/ 43/ 5.42
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
41.3/ 13/ 38.18
28.2/ 13/ 25.58
33.3/ 13/ 30.42
26.1/ 13/ 23.60
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
1.6/ 13/ 1.40
1.3/ 13/ 1.14
1.1/ 13/ .96
1.4/ 13/ 1.22
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
38.7/ 11/ .2784
42.0/ 11/ .3081
70.2/ 11/ .6110
32.0/ 11/ .2211
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
9.7/ 11/ .0585
8.5/ 11/ .0509
8.2/ 11/ .0490
8.3/ 11/ .0496
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.1/ 43/ 23.44
1.3/ 43/ 26.43
2.8/ 43/ 59.92
.9/ 43/ 19.27
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 2/ .10
.1/ 2/ .10
.1/ 2/ .10
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
47.12
42.71
21.70
59.45
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
17.16
25.39
28.55
14.96
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
35.92
23.86
28.60
21.88
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2211
.2585
.5643
.1723
HOX CONCENTRATION PPH
23.34
26.33
59.82
18.86
HC MASS GRAMS
1.585
2.381
2.714
1.431
CO MASS GRAMS
6.724
4.534
5.511
4.241
C02 HASS GRAMS
650.45
771.84
1708.63
524.72
NOX MASS GRAMS
7.238
8.289
19.097
6.057
FUEL KG (LB)
.209 ( .46)
.247 ( .54)
.542 ( 1.20)
.168 ( .37)
KW HR (HP HR)
.53 ( .71)
.70 ( .94)
2.01 ( 2.70)
.51 ( .68)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
2.162 ( 1.612)
( 1-61)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-21 P90-22
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
5.601 ( 4.177]
( 4.18)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 8.556 .290
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.846 ( 8.088)
( 8.09)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 5.126
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.367 ( 1.019)
( 1.02)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.311 ( .512)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
3.75 ( 5.03)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HS)
975. ( 727.)
B-5-
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH4 RON
DATE 5/ 4/92 TIME
COHPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 742.4 HH HG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 74.0 F RH 54.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HON. 11.2 G/KG
AH 69.9 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.4 C (59.7 F)
! 78.6 GR/LB) NOX HDHTDITY C.F. 1.009
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .982
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYN?
LAN?
LAP
NYNP
TIME SECONDS
295.8
300.0
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.52 (1148.2)
32.51 (1148.1)
32.46 (1146.2)
32.52 (1148.4)
TOT. 90KH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .001
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
160.6 ( 5670.)
162.8 ( 5750.)
165.3 ( 5836.)
166.1 ( 5865.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
18.2/ 42/ 18.23
28.2/ 42/ 28.26
34.4/ 42/ 34.46
20.1/ 42/ 20.12
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
6.3/ 42/ 6.31
6.5/ 42/ 6.51
6.3/ 42/ 6.31
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
22.3/ 13/ 20.06
22.8/ 13/ 20.52
27.1/ 13/ 24.54
15.9/ 13/ 14.18
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 13/ .35
.5/ 13/ .44
.6/ 13/ .52
.3/ 13/ .26
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
33.7/ 11/ .2352
40.0/ 11/ .2900
68.6/ 11/ .5912
32.8/ 11/ .2277
002 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.3/ 11/ .0496
8.5/ 11/ .0509
8.5/ 11/ .0509
8.2/ 11/ .0490
HOI SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.94
1.2/ 43/ 24.08
2.7/ 43/ 57.90
.9/ 43/ 18.21
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
.2/ 2/ .21
.1/ 2/ .10
.3/ 2/ .31
DILUTION FACTOR
56.07
45.45
22.44
57.99
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
12.23
22.09
28.24
13.93
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
19.28
19.63
23.34
13.61
002 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1865
.2402
.5426
.1796
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
18.43
23.88
57.80
17.90
BC MASS GRAMS
1.128
2.066
2.682
1.329
CO MASS GRAMS
3.604
3.721
4.491
2.632
C02 HASS GRAMS
547.84
715.69
1640.82
545.58
HOI HASS GRAMS
5.713
7.506
18.442
5.740
FUEL KG [LB)
.175 ( .39)
.229 ( .50)
.521 ( 1.15)
.174 ( .38)
KS HR (HP HR)
.49 ( .66)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 f 2.73)
.50 ( .67)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.932 (
1.441)
( 1-44)
(COHT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS
P90-23 P90-24
BSCO
G/KS HR
(G/HP HR)
3.875 (
2.890)
( 2.89)
90 HH PILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
4.514 .254
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
10.031 (
7.480)
( 7.48)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
2.833
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.750 (
.567)
( -57)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.295 (
.484)
WORK
KH HR
(HP HR)
3.73 (
5.00)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
925. (
690.)
S-6
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 2.9 L(2J9. CID) 1-4
EKGIHE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TH5 RUN
DATE 5/ 4/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM BUT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
SCR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.4 HH HG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 26.7 C (80.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 74.0 F RH 54.0 PCT AH 69.9 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUM. 11.4 G/KG ( 79.7 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.6 C (60.1 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .982
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANP
LAF
NYNF
TIME SECONDS
295.9
300.0
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCYH)
32.59 (1150.7)
32.60 11151.1)
32.42 (1144.7)
32.59 (1150.6)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCMH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .001
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. METRES(SCF)
161.0 ( 5684.)
163.3 ( 5765.)
165.1 ( 5829.)
166.4 ( 5876.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
17.9/ 42/ 17.93
27.8/ 42/ 27.87
33.7/ 42/ 33.70
20.1/ 42/ 20.17
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.4/ 42/ 5.41
5.3/ 42/ 5.31
5.3/ 42/ 5.31
5.2/ 42/ 5.21
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
14.7/ 13/ 13.08
19.8/ 13/ 17.75
28.3/ 13/ 25.67
13.8/ 13/ 12.27
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 13/ .44
.5/ 13/ .44
.5/ 13/ .44
.4/ 13/ .35
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RAHGE/PCT
31.2/ 11/ .2145
39.2/ 11/ .2828
68.4/ 11/ .5888
31.5/ 11/ ,2169
co2 mm wmimziiwi
8A) 11/ .0502
8.6/ 11/ .0515
8.2/ 11/ .0490
3.6/ 11/ .0515
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 19.20
1.2/ 43/ 25.46
2.9/ 43/ 61.36
.9/ 43/ 18.77
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
.3/ 2/ .31
.2/ 2/ .21
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
61.59
46.64
22.53
60.86
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
12.61
22.68
28.63
15.05
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
12.38
16.92
24.52
11.66
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1651
.2324
.5420
.1663
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
18.69
25.16
61.16
18.36
HC MASS GRAMS
1.166
2.127
2.715
1.439
CO HASS GRAMS
2.320
3.216
4.712
2.260
002 MASS GRAMS
486.19
694.21
1636.72
506.30
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.825
7.952
19.548
5.916
FDEL KG (LB)
.155 ( .34)
.222 ( .49)
.519 ( 1.14)
.162 ( .36)
KH HR (HP BR)
.49 ( .66)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 ( 2.73)
.49 { .66)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
IR
(G/HP HR)
2.001 ( 1.492) |
: i.49)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-25 P90-26
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
3.361 ( 2.507) |
: 2.5D
90 HH FILTER W. GAINS (HG) 3.875 .255
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.546 ( 7.864} (
: 7.861
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST 2.463
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.662 { .494) 1
[ .49)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.284 ( .467)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
3.72 ( 4.99)
BSG02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
893. ( 666.)
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COHPOSITE
PROJECT SO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH4 RON
DATE 5/4/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 742.4 HH EG (29.23 IN HG) CELL: 74.0 F RH 54.0 PCT AH 69.9 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.4 C (59.7 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0) ENGINE ABS. HOH, 11.2 G/KG ( 78.6 GR/LB) HOI HUKIDITY C.F. 1.009
DRY-TO-tfET C.F. .982
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLD AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
1.965
( 1.466) (
1.47)
BSFC G/KW HR (G/HP HR) .297 ( .488)
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
4.123
( 3.075) (
3.07)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR) 932. ( 695.)
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
10.148
( 7.567) (
7.57)
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
.847
( -632) (
.63)
0-3
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRANS
PROJECT JO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 1(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TC6 RON
DATE 5/12/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROHETER 740.2 MM HG (29.14 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 78.0 F RH 60.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.4 G/KG
AH 89.0 GR/LB
( 72.7 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.2 C (57.5
HOX HUMIDITY C.F. .994
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .977
F)
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.6
300.0
305.0
305.8
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.45 (1145.7)
32.43 (1145.1)
32.41 (1144.3)
32.45 (1145.8)
TOT. 90HH RATE SOW (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
.05 ( 1.93)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCMH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.0O( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCMH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.1 ( 5654.)
162.4 ( 5735.)
165.0 ( 5827.)
165.7 ( 5850.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
10.3/ 43/ 20.80
13.9/ 43/ 28.07
16.0/ 43/ 32.19
8.8/ 43/ 17.63
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
2.6/ 43/ 5.22
2.8/ 43/ 5.62
2.8/ 43/ 5.62
2.8/ 43/ 5.62
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
44.3/ 13/ 41.14
26.5/ 13/ 23.98
31.2/ 13/ 28.42
27.7/ 13/ 25.10
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
1.0/ 13/ .87
.9/ 13/ .79
1.0/ 13/ .37
1.0/ 13/ .87
C02 SAMPLE METER/RAMGE/PCT
39.3/ 11/ .2837
42.6/ 11/ .3137
69.9/ 11/ .6073
33.5/ 11/ .2335
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
10.6/ 11/ .0642
10.7/ 11/ .0649
10.3/ 11/ .0623
11.3/ 11/ .0688
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.1/ 43/ 21.92
1.2/ 43/ 25.53
2.8/ 43/ 59.35
.9/ 43/ 18.82
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
.1/ 2/ .10
.2/ 2/ .21
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
46.24
42.03
21.85
56.36
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
15.70
22.58
26.83
12.11
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
39.28
22.61
26.72
23.66
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2208
.2503
.5478
.1660
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
21.51
25.43
59.15
18.31
HC MASS GRAMS
1.444
2.107
2.543
1.153
CO HASS GRAMS
7.322
4.276
5.133
4.564
C02 HASS GRAMS
646.89
743.84
1653.82
502.97
NOX HASS GRAMS
6.549
7.853
18.558
5.767
FUEL KG (LB)
.208 ( .46)
.238 ( .52)
.525 ( 1.16)
.161 ( .36)
KW HR (HP HR)
.53 ( .71)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 ( 2.74)
.53 ( .71)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.905 ( 1.421)
( 1-42)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-89 P90-90
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
5.599 ( 4.176)
( 4.18)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
6.785 .297
BSKOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.183 ( 7.594)
( 7.59)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
4.208
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.106 ( .825)
( -83)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.298 ( .490)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
3.80 ( 5.10)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
933. ( 696.)
B'f
-------
ENGINE NOHBEB
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EHISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TH8 SDN
DATE 5/12/92 TIME 11:23
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
GASOMETER 740.2 HH HG (29.14 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 27.2 C (81.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SOW (SCFH)
TOT. ADX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 34.0 PCT AH 49.6 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HOH. 11.4 G/KG ( 79.7 GR/LB)
1
NYNF
296.0
32.43 (1145.1)
.05 ( 1.92)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
160.3 ( 5659.)
2
LANF
300.0
32.43 (1145.1)
.05 ( 1.92)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
162.4 ( 5735.)
ENGINE DEB PT. 15.6 C (60.0 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .986
3
LAP
305.0
32.27 (1139.5)
.05 ( 1.92)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .00)
164.3 ( 5802.)
4
NYNF
305.9
32.44 (1145.4)
.05 ( 1.92)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
165.7 ( 5849.)
EC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
002 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
17.1/ 42/ 17.09
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
29.1/ 13/ 26.43
.8/ 13/ .70
35.1/ 11/ .2471
11.1/ 11/ .0675
.9/ 43/ 18.43
.2/ 2/ .21
25.5/ 42/ 25.56
6.2/ 42/ 6.21
22.1/ 13/ 19.87
.6/ 13/ .52
40.7/ 11/ .2963
10.9/ 11/ .0662
1.2/ 43/ 24.14
.3/ 2/ .31
32
6
27
69
10
2
3/ 42/ 32.38
4/ 42/ 6.41
9/ 13/ 25.29
3/ 13/ .26
6/ 11/ .6036
5/ 11/ .0636
7/ 43/ 57.82
3/ 2/ .31
19.3/ 42/ 19.32
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
19.9/ 13/ 17.84
.6/ 13/ .52
34.0/ 11/ .2377
10.4/ 11/ .0630
.9/ 43/ 18.24
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
53.31
11.10
25.33
.1808
18.23
44.55
19.50
19.04
.2316
23.84
21.99
26.26
24.48
.5428
57.52
55.51
13.42
17.06
.1759
17.83
HC HASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
002 HASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
1.022
4.727
530.14
5.655
.170 ( .37)
.52 ( .70)
1.819
3.600
688.13
7.495
.220 ( .48)
.71 ( .95)
2.479
4.683
1631.93
18.300
.518 ( 1,
2.04 ( 2.
14)
74)
1.278
3.289
533.09
5.719
.170 ( .38)
.51 ( .69)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/Kif HR (LB/HP HR)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.742 ( 1.299) (
4.302 ( 3.208) (
9.812 ( 7.317)
.779 ( .581)
.285 (
3.79 (
893. (
1.30) (CONT)
( 3.21)
( 7.32) (CONT)
( .58)
.468)
5.08)
666.)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
90 MM FILTER ST. GAINS
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
(HG)
P90-91
4.718
P90-92
.224
2.952
B'fo
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TH9R RON
DATE 5/12/92 TIME 12:44
COMPUTES PROGRAM HOT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 739.6 HH HG (29.12 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 28.3 C (83.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 78.0 F RH 60.0 PCT AH 89.1 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.3 G/KG ( 79.4 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEH PT. 15.5 C (59.9 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIME SECONDS
295.5
299.8
304.9
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.37 (1143.2)
32.37 (1143.0)
32.32 (1141.1)
32.37 (1142.8)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
TOT. 20120 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFM)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
159.7 ( 5639.)
162.0 ( 5721.)
164.5 ( 5808.)
165.3 ( 5836.)
HC SAMPLE KETER/RANGE/PPH
17.0/ 42/ 17.03
26.2/ 42/ 26.21
32.8/ 42/ 32.81
19.3/ 42/ 19.37
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.5/ 42/ 5.51
5.6/ 42/ 5.61
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
5.5/ 42/ 5.51
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
15.2/ 13/ 13.54
23.4/ 13/ 21.08
30.5/ 13/ 27.75
12.7/ 13/ 11.27
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 13/ .26
.3/ 13/ .26
.3/ 13/ .26
.3/ 13/ .26
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
33.0/ 11/ .2293
39.8/ 11/ .2882
68.8/ 11/ .5937
33.0/ 11/ .2293
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
9.6/ 11/ .0578
9.7/ 11/ .0585
9.7/ 11/ .0585
9.6/ 11/ .0578
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (»)
.9/ 43/ 18.44
1.2/ 43/ 24.33
2.8/ 43/ 58.49
.9/ 43/ 18.13
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
.2/ 2/ .21
.31 2/ .31
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
57.67
45.76
22.35
57.66
HC CONCENTRATION PHI
11.62
20.72
27.08
13.96
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
12.96
20.30
26.65
10.75
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1725
.2310
.5378
.1725
NOX CONCENTRATION PHI
18.03
24.13
58.19
17.72
HC MASS GRAMS
1.066
1.929
2.559
1.325
CO HASS GRAMS
2.410
3.830
5.104
2.069
002 HASS GRAMS
504.08
684.64
1618.52
521.68
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.572
7.563
18.520
5.667
FUEL KG (LB)
.161 ( .35)
.219 ( .48)
.514 ( 1.13)
.166 ( .37)
KW HR (HP HR)
.50 ( .67)
.71 ( .95)
2.04 ( 2.74)
.51 ( .68)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KH HR
(G/HP HR)
1.830 ( 1.365)
( 1-36)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-95 P90-96
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
3.569 ( 2.661)
( 2.66)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.719 .262
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.931 ( 7.405)
( 7.41)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.377
PART.
G/KH HR
(G/HP HR)
.632 ( .472)
( .47)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.282 ( .463)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
3.76 ( 5.04)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
886. ( 660.)
B-H
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEl 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COMPOSITE
TEST JD-3.9-TH8 RUN
DATE 5/12/92 TIME 11:23
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-P
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.2 HH HG (29.14 IN EG) CELL: 78.0 F RH 34.0 PCT AH 49.6 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.6 C (60.0 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 27.2 C (81.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.4 G/KG ( 79.7 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .986
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLD AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KH HR
(G/HP
HR)
1.765
( 1.316)
(
1.32)
BSFC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
.286 ( .471)
BSCO
G/KH HR
(G/HP
HR)
4.488
( 3.347)
(
3.35)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
899. ( 670.)
BSHOX
G/KH HR
(G/HP
HR)
9.865
( 7.356)
(
7.36)
PART.
G/KH HR
(G/HP
HR)
.826
( .616)
(
.62)
B-12
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 LI239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TC7 RUN
DATE 5/13/92 TIHE
COMPUTES PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CAST 1
PROJECT SO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 740.7 HN HG (29.16 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 26.7 C (80.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 74.0 F Rfl 58.0 PCT AH 75.0 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 16.5 G/KG (115.3 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 21.3 C (70.4 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.P. 1.117
DRY-TO-SET C.F. .980
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.4
300.0
304.9
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.62 (1151.6)
32.63 (1152.1)
32.51 (1148.0)
32.63 (1152.0)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.06 ( 1.98)
.06 ( 1.98)
.06 ( 1.98)
.06 ( 1.98)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.9 ( 5680.)
163.4 ( 5771.)
165.5 ( 5844.)
166.6 ( 5884.)
IC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.0/ 43/ 22.20
14.3/ 43/ 28.75
16.5/ 43/ 33.35
9.9/ 43/ 19.91
EC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.0/ 43/ 6.02
2.9/ 43/ 5.82
2.9/ 43/ 5.82
2.7/ 43/ 5.42
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
46.3/ 13/ 43.13
27.9/ 13/ 25.29
30.4/ 13/ 27.66
23.5/ 13/ 21.17
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.7/ 13/ .61
.6/ 13/ .52
.8/ 13/ .70
.8/ 13/ .70
C02 SAHPLE KEIER/RANGE/PCT
38.2/ 11/ .2739
41.6/ 11/ .3045
69.4/ 11/ .6011
31.6/ 11/ .2178
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.6/ 11/ .0515
8.7/ 11/ .0521
8.8/ 11/ .0527
8.9/ 11/ .0534
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.1/ 43/ 21.64
1.2/ 431 25.42
2.8/ 43/ 59.56
.9/ 43/ 19.35
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 2/ .10
.1/ 2/ .10
.2/ 2/ .21
.3/ 2/ .31
DILUTION FACTOR
47.79
43.25
22.07
60.41
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
16.30
23.06
27.79
14.58
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
41.51
24.17
26.17
20.01
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2235
.2536
.5507
.1653
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
21.54
25.32
59.36
19.04
HC HASS GRAMS
1.506
2.165
2.642
1.396
CO HASS GRAMS
7.772
4.598
5.042
3.882
C02 HASS GRAMS
657.77
758.12
1667.50
503.80
NOX HASS GRAMS
7.401
8.840
20.989
6.779
FUEL KG (LB)
.212 ( .47)
.243 ( .53)
.529 { 1.17)
.162 ( .36)
KW HR (HP HR)
.52 ( .70)
.71 ( .95)
2.04 ( 2.73)
.52 ( .70)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW BR (G/HP HR)
2.035 ( 1.517) ( 1.52) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS P90-97 P90-98
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
5.621 (
4.192) ( 4.19)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) l
5.576 .259
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
11.617 (
8.663) ( 8.66) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
3.977
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.050 (
.783) ( .78)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.302 (
.497)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.79 (
5.08)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
947. (
706.)
6-/3
-------
ENGIHE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGIHE NUMBER
ENGIHE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGIHE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH10 ROH
DATE 5/13/92 TIME 11:40
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.7 HH HG (29.16 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 28.9 C (84.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 74.0 F R3 54.0 PCT AH 70.2 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.7 G/KG ( 75.1 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEM PT. 14.7 C (58.4 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.000
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .982
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANP
LAP
NYNF
TDffi SECONDS
295.2
300.0
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.42 (1144.7)
32.44 (1145.5)
32.23 (1138.0)
32.44 (1145.4)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SOW (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
159.8 ( 5641.)
162.5 ( 5737.)
164.1 ( 5795.)
165.7 ( 5849.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
17.5/ 42/ 17.53
26.0/ 42/ 26.05
32.4/ 42/ 32.47
19.4/ 42/ 19.46
3C BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.6/ 42/ 5.61
5.7/ 42/ 5.71
5.9/ 42/ 5.91
5.6/ 42/ 5.61
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
28.8/ 13/ 26.14
23.6/ 13/ 21.27
28.2/ 13/ 25.58
20.5/ 13/ 18.39
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.8/ 13/ .70
.7/ 13/ .61
.6/ 13/ .52
.7/ 13/ .61
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
33.7/ 11/ .2352
38.9/ 11/ .2801
67.5/ 11/ .5778
31.9/ 11/ .2202
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
5.71 11/ .0521
8.8/ 11/ .0527
9.0/ 11/ .0540
9.0/ 11/ .0540
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.43
1.2/ 43/ 24.31
2.8/ 43/ 58.27
.9/ 43/ 18.30
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 2/ .31
.1/ 2/ .10
.21 2/ .21
.21 2[ .21
DILUTION FACTOR
55.95
47.05
22.96
59.83
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
12.03
20.46
26.82
13.95
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
24.89
20.19
24.35
17.40
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1840
.2285
.5262
.1671
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
18.12
24.21
58.07
18.10
HC MASS GRAMS
1.104
1.910
2.529
1.328
CO MASS GRAMS
4.630
3.819
4.653
3.356
002 MASS GRAMS
537.86
679.22
1579.70
506.48
NOX MASS GRAMS
5.539
7.524
18.231
5.735
FUEL KG (LB)
.172 ( .38)
.217 ( .48)
.501 ( 1.11)
.162 ( .36)
K» HR (HP HR)
.51 ( .69)
.71 ( .95)
2.04 ( 2.73)
.51 ( .69)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.821 ( 1.358) ( 1.36) (COST)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-99 P90-100
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
4.362 (
3.252) ( 3.25)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 4
1.770 .220
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
9.814 ( 7.318) ( 7.32) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.981
PART. G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
.790 (
.589) ( .59)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.279 (
.459)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.77 (
5.06)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
875. (
653.)
B-li
-------
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 Lf239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EHISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-3.9-TH11 RON
DATE 5/13/92 TIME 12:20
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.7 KM EG (29.16 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 28.3 C (83.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 64.0 F [
ENGINE ABS. HUH.
B 95.0 PCT AH 87.0 GR/LB
11.3 G/KG ( 79.0 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.4 C (59.8 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.011
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
BAG NUHBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIKE SECONDS
295.5
300.1
305.0
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.40 (1144.2)
32.43 (1145.1)
32.28 (1139.9)
32.44 (1145.4)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
.05 ( 1.92)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. ADX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
159.9 ( 5645.)
162.5 ( 5737.)
164.4 ( 5804.)
165.7 ( 5849.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
17.7/ 42/ 17.71
27.0/ 42/ 27.05
32.7/ 42/ 32.76
19.7/ 42/ 19.75
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
21.4/ 13/ 19.22
23.0/ 13/ 20.71
28.5/ 13/ 25.86
15.4/ 13/ 13.72
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.8/ 13/ .70
.8/ 13/ .70
1.2/ 13/ 1.05
1.0/ 13/ .87
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
32.5/ 11/ .2252
38.1/ 11/ .2731
66.9/ 11/ .5706
30.3/ 11/ .2072
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.6/ 11/ .0515
8.7/ 11/ .0521
9.0/ 11/ .0540
8.7/ 11/ .0521
mi SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.12
1.1/ 43/ 23.87
2.7/ 43/ 57.86
.8/ 43/ 17.79
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 2/ .31
.1/ 2/ .10
.1/ 2/ .10
.2/ 2/ .21
DILUTION FACTOR
58.56
48.24
23.25
63.67
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
11.71
21.07
26.91
13.83
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
17 89
19.30
23.81
12.41
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1746
.2220
.5189
.1559
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
17.81
23.77
57.76
17.59
HC HASS GRAMS
1.075
1.966
2.541
1.317
CO HASS GRAMS
3.329
3.651
4.557
2.394
C02 HASS GRAMS
510.57
659.91
1560.39
472.40
NOX HASS GRAMS
5 504
7.464
18.351
5.630
FUEL KG (LB)
.163 ( .36)
.211 ( .47}
.495 ( 1.09)
.151 ( .33)
KW HR (HP HR)
.51 ( .68)
.70 ( .94)
2.04 ( 2.74)
.51 ( .68)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.836 ( 1.369)
( 1-37)
(CONT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS P90-101 P90-102
BSCO
G/KW HE
(G/HP HR)
3.707 ( 2.764)
( 2.76)
90 HH FILTER BT. GAINS (KG) 4.245 .239
BSBOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.831 ( 7.331)
( 7.33)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 2.670
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.710 ( .530)
( -53)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.271 ( .446)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
3.76 ( 5.04)
BSC02
G/KH HR
(G/HP HR)
852. ( 636.)
3"/5"
-------
ENGINE EHISSIOH RESULTS
COMPOSITE
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-TH10 RON
DATE 5/13/92 TIME 11:40
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 740.7 HH HG (29.16 IN HG) CELL: 74.0 F RH 54.0 PCT Afl 70.2 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.7 C (58.4 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 28.9 C (84.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.7 G/KG ( 75.1 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.000
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .982
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLE AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KW E
R (G/HP
HR)
1.851
( 1.381) (
1.38)
BSFC G/KW E
R (G/HP HR)
.282 ( .464)
BSCO
G/KW H
R (G/HP
HR)
4.542
( 3.387) (
3.39)
BSC02 G/KW E
R (G/HP HR)
886. ( 660.)
BSNOX
G/KW H
R (G/HP
HR)
10.072
( 7.511) (
7.51)
PART.
G/KW H
R (G/HP
HR)
.827
( .617) (
.62)
B-tt,
-------
FIGURE C1. JD-3.9-TC6 TEOM DATA
Do Seconds
-------
FIGURE C2. JD-3.9-TH8 TEOM DATA
Seconds
-------
APPENDIX C
TRANSIENT TEOM FIGURES FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D NONROAD ENGINE
-------
FIGURE C3. JD-3.9-TH9R TEOM DATA
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200
Seconds
-------
Pi
1
K>
FIGURE C4. TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #3 TEOM
CD
-------
FIGURE C5. JD-3.9-TC7 TEOM DATA
Seconds
-------
FIGURE C6. JD-3.9-TH10 TEOM DATA
Seconds
-------
FIGURE C7. JD-3.9-TH11 TEOM DATA
Seconds
-------
FIGURE C8. TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #4 TEOM
Seconds
JD-3.9-TC7 JD-3.9-TH10 JD-3.9-TH11
-------
John Deere 3.9L Off Highway ISO 8178 8-Mode Test Data
08-4855-150 Test Date = 5-6-92
C.\123R3\DATA\JD39SS
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
—John Deere 3.9L Ofi
f-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft—lb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
210
52
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
158
39
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
105
26
8
Idle
0
15%
850
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
g/hr
g/hr
g/hr
g/hr
1
75
24.6
14.22
86.08
637.45
24.10
2
56
19.2
27.79
30.80
356.67
9.90
3
38
15.4
27.07
49.64
198.43
8.67
4
7
6.8
59.88
91.48
53.87
7.34
5
52
19.9
9.38
898.78
383.47
125.90
6
38
13.7
20.77
21.62
279.74
11.69
7
26
9.6
21.50
20.65
153.90
7.14
8
0
1.3
12.71
14.25
20.83
1.99
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
g/lb
g/lb
g/lb
g/lb
1
75
NA
0.58
3.50
25.92
0.98
2
56
NA
1.45
1.60
18.58
0.52
3
38
NA
1.75
3.21
12.84
0.56
4
7
NA
8.76
13.38
7.88
1.07
5
52
NA
0.47
45.20
19.28
6.33
6
38
NA
1.51
1.57
20.36
0.85
7
26
NA
2.23
2.14
15.98
0.74
8
0
NA
9.42
10.56
15.43
1.48
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
75
0.329
0.19
1.15
8.55
0.32
2
56
0.345
0.50
0.55
6.41
0.18
3
38
0.406
0.71
1.31
5.22
0.23
4
7
0.954
8.35
12.76
7.51
1.02
5
52
0.383
0.18
17.36
7.41
2.43
6
38
0.363
0.55
0.57
7.37
0.31
7
26
0.370
0.83
0.79
5.92
0.27
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
8-Mode
Weighted
0.376
0.62
3.47
7.17
0.584
-------
DEPARTMENT OF EMISSIONS RESEARCH
, ^ ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND AMBIENT CONDITIONS
^ " 1 RAW DATA SHEET FOR HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL
Test No. 9 /PIrf.(f SwRI Project No. ^ ^ Project Leader:
Test Operator: ^' iD suLcm No. Engine I.D. Fuel Code
Engine Configuration:
Measurement
Mode
n
Mode
tn
Mode
#3
Mode
#4
Mode
#5
Mode
#6
Mode
wi
Mode
#8
Torque (ft-lb)
/If
a\o
K 6
10*r
Speed (rpm)
Me#
}%S €>
3Hot5?
lltcf
13 e r
PCI
Power (bhp)
f^h,6
\J
u
I? '
X <»
z>
Curb Idle (rpm)
—
High Idle (rpm)
fe>
-—
—
—
-—
Water Out (°F)
If*
\*fZ
/20
1 &L
W0
1^
Water In (°F)
/?9
rtv
/?(
1 Cf 1
Iff!
/")3
Oil (°F)
QZ*
in
1\C
/SZ
Inlet Air (°F)
90
O^r
n
#3
9h
tr
Fuel (°F)
lt)<
Exhaust (°F)
6cn
if on
//(?
A1$?
Intercooler In (°F)
—
-—
¦—
Inteicooler Out (°F)
—
—
—
-—
—
«—
Inlet Air Dewpoint (°F)
5L<
fi-t?
TO. 0
S1.H
,T?.^
Chiller Water (°F)
Zh
h'U
ft f
TH
Barometer (m. Hg)
W.l?
te.-Q
&.j r
&3 *
Inlet Air Restrict, (in. H2O)
n. *
1.?.?
n.i,
0.2
IT
n 0
Exhaust Restriction (in. Hg)
2.1
/.9
/.C
I
,«
. (.
./
Fuel Flow (lbm/hr)
Of,. 9
i0.»
iH.n
(,.*
/I, 6
n,v
Oil Pressure (psig)
(, 0.0
60, c
tt.f)
Sa
/T s
ff
Boost Pressure B-4 IC (psig)
—
—
Boost Press. After IC (psig)
—
¦
Engine Hours
Date
c-d
-------
APPENDIX D
EIGHT-MODE STEADY-STATE TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4039D
NONROAD ENGINE
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-1 RUN
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIKE
COHPUTER PROGRAM HOT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 746.0 HH BG (29.37 IN HG) CELL: 78.0 F RH 43.0 PCT AH 62.8 GR/LB
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.7 C (80.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.1 G/KG ( 77.6 GR/LB)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIME SECONDS
600.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.59 (1150.6)
TOT. 90KH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.57)
TOT. 20X20 RATI SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
326.4 ( 11524.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
17.5/ 42/ 17.54
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.3/ 42/ 5.31
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
42.3/ 13/ 39.16
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 13/ .09
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCI
59.5/ 3/1.0344
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
3.4/ 3/ .0534
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
4.1/ 43/170.05
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 3/ 1.04
DILUTION FACTOR
12.88
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
12.64
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
37.77
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.9851
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
169.09
HC MASS GRAHS
2.370
CO HASS GRAHS
14.349
C02 MASS GRAHS
5881.64
NOX HASS GRAHS
106.259
FUEL KG (LB)
1.858 ( 4.10)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.27 [ 12.43)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HP)
.256 ( .191) (
: -19)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-51 P90-52
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.548 ( 1.154) |
I 1-15)
90 HH FILTER «T. GAINS (HG)
5.390 .103
BSNOX
G/KB HR
(G/HP HR)
11.464 ( 8.549) (
: 8.55)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
4.018
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.434 ( .323) |
: .32)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.200 ( .329)
wORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
9.27 ( 12.43)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
635. ( 473.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.3 C (59.5 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.007
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .976
J>-t
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT IIO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NOHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 LI239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-2 RON
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT l.O-C
CELL 1 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BABOHETER 746.3 HH HG (29.38 IB HG) CELL: 78.0 F Rfl 43.0 PCT AH 62.8 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.1 C (57.4 F)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 25.7 C (80.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.3 G/KG ( 71.9 GR/LB) NOX HUHIDITTf C.F. .992
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIHE SECONDS
600.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.60 (1151.0)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.57)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
326.5 ( 11528.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
29.4/ 42/ 29.40
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.0/ 42/ 5.01
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
15.8/ 13/ 14.08
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 13/ .17
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
47.4/ 3/ .8051
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
2.4/ 3/ .0377
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (H)
2.3/ 43/ 96.49
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.21 3/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
16.56
EC CONCENTRATION PPH
24.70
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
13.51
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.7697
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
96.00
HC HASS GRAMS
4.633
CO HASS GRAMS
5.135
C02 HASS GRAMS
4597.23
NOX HASS GRAMS
59.455
FUEL KG (LB)
1.452 ( 3.20)
KW HR (HP HR1
6.91 ( 9.27)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.670 (
.500)
(
.50)
(COST)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-53 P90-54
asoo
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.743 (
.554)
(
.55)
90 HH FILTER WT. CAINS (HG1
1.948 .305
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
8.601 (
6.414)
(
6.41)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
1.650
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.239 (
.178)
(
.18)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.210 (
.345)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
6.91 (
9.27)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
665. (
496.)
-------
ENGINE EHISSIOH RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
EHGINE NDHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID1 1-4
EHGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-3 ROM
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIHE
COHPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 745.7 HH BG (29.36 IN HG1
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.1 C (79.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 43.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. BDH. 9.9 G/KG
1
1200.1
32.67 (1153.5)
.04 ( 1.53)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
654.3 ( 23103.1
AH 62.8 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.6 C (56.4 F)
( 69.3 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .985
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RAMGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
29.2/ 42/ 29.24
5.5/ 42/ 5.51
25.0/ 13/ 22.57
.3/ 13/ .26
74.4/ 11/ .6647
8.5/ 11/ .0509
.6/ 43/ 54.04
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
20.00
24.01
21.73
.6164
53.65
HC MASS GRAHS
CO MASS GRAHS
C02 MASS GRAHS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HE)
9.024
16.549
7378.26
66.148
2.336 ( 5.15)
9.45 ( 12.67)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSEC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.955 ( .712)
( -71)
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.752 ( 1.306)
( 1.31)
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
7.001 ( 5.221)
( 5.22)
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.306 ( .228)
( .23)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.247 ( .406)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
9.45 ( 12.67)
BS002
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
781. ( 582.)
(CONT) 90 MM FILTER NUMBERS P90-55 P90-56
90 MM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG1 3.566 .265
(CONT) PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST 2.889
>3
-------
ENGIKE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT SO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-4 RUN
DATE 5/6/92 TIHE
COHPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D
HCR 1.30
EH-1392-F
BAROMETER 745.7 HH EG (29.36 IN KG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOI SAHPLE
HOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (K)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
HOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 78.0 F RH 43.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.1 G/KG
1
1200.1
32.62 (1151.9)
.04 ( 1.55)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
653.4 ( 23071.)
58.8/ 42/ 58.85
5.8/ 42/ 5.81
44.5/ 13/ 41.34
.5/ 13/ .44
74.8/ 12/ .3166
15.1/ 12/ .0519
.2/ 43/ 14.57
1.1/ 1/ .29
41.04
53.18
40.09
.2660
14.28
AH 62.8 GR/LB
77.4 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.2 C (59.<
HOX HUHIDITY C.F. 1.006
DRMO-WET C.F. .983
F)
HC MASS GRAHS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
HOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
19.963
30.496
3179.22
17.958
1.034 ( 2.28)
1.78 ( 2.39)
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
11.201 ( 8.353)
( 8.35)
(COST)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-57 P90-58
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
17.111 (12.760)
(12.76)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.733 .563
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.076 ( 7.514)
( 7.51)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.446
PAST.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.372 ( 1.023)
( 1.02)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.580 ( .954)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
1.78 ( 2.39)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1784. ( 1330.)
M
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-5 RUN
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIME
COHPCTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROHETER 745.7 HH HG (29.36 IN HG) CELL: 78.0 F RB 43.0 PCT AH 62.8 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.9 C (57.0 F)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 28.3 C (83.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.1 G/KG ( 70.9 GR/LB) NOi HUMIDITY C.F. .989
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER 1
TIME SECONDS 210.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH) 32.62 (1151.9)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH) .04 ( 1.30)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF) 114.3 ( 4036.)
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
HC SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PPH 16.9/ 42/ 16.96
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH 9.2/ 42/ 9.21
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 86.2/ 11/406.08
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .1/ 11/ .26
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT 84.4/ 11/ .8037
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT 8.2/ 11/ .0490
NOI SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W) 7.1/ 43/103.67
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .1/3/ .26
DILUTION FACTOR 15.86
HC CONCENTRATION PPH 8.33
CO CONCENTRATION PPH 393.99
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT .7578
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH 103.43
HC MASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAMS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
.547
52.429
1584.76
22.369
.524 ( 1.16)
2.25 ( 3.02)
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.243 ( .181)
( .18)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-59 P90-60
BSCO
G/KW BR
(G/HP HR)
23.281 (17.361)
(17.36)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 8.246 .063
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.933 ( 7.407)
( 7.41)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 7.344
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
3.261 ( 2.432)
( 2.43)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.233 ( .333)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
2.25 ( 3.02)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
704. ( 525.)
P- 5"
-------
ENGINE emission results
s.s.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUNBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
EKGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-6 ROM
DATE 5/6/92 TIME
COKP0TER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 745.2 HH HG (29.34 IN 3G) CELL: 78.0 F Rfl 43.0 PCT AH 62.9 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.0 C (55.4 F)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 27.8 C (82.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 9.6 G/KG ( 66.9 GR/LB) M HUMIDITY C.F. .979
BAG RESOLTS
BAG NUMBER 1
TIME SECONDS 600.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH) 32.54 (1149.1)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH) .06 ( 2.01)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AOL SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. METRES(SCF) 326.1 I 11513.)
DRY-TO-tfET C.F. MO
EC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
24.3/ 42/ 24.31
K BCKGXD HETER/RAHGE/PPH
6.1/ 42/ 6.11
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.0/ 13/ 9.74
CO BCKCRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.0/ 13/ .00
C02 SAHPLE KETER/RANGE/PCT
69.5/ 11/ .6023
C02 BCKGRD HEIFER/RANGE/PCT
8.7/ 11/ .0521
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.8/ 43/ 76.76
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
22.12
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
18.48
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
9.49
co2 coKEsmrm per
.5526
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
76.36
HC MASS GRAHS 3.462
CO HASS GRAHS 3.604
C02 HASS GRAHS 3296.04
NOX HASS GRAHS 46.631
FUEL KG (LB) 1.041 ( 2.29)
KW HR (HP HR) 4.72 { 6.33)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.733 ( .547)
( .55) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-61 P90-62
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.764 ( .569)
( -57)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.286 .116
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
9.879 ( 7.367)
( 7.37) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
1.949
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.413 { .308)
( .31)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.221 ( .363)
WORK
KM
HR
(HP HR)
4.72 ( 6.33)
BS002
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
698. ( 521.)
P-6,
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE HUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-7 RON
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM BDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 745.2 MH HG (29.34 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 28.3 C (83.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER
TIHE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH),
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRES(SCF)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 43.0 PCT AH 62.9 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.3 G/KG ( 72.0 GR/LB)
1
1200.2
32.48 (1146.7)
.04 ( 1.53)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
650.5 ( 22969.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.1 C (57.4 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .992
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .982
HC SAHPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
24.3/ 42/ 24.31
5.3/ 42/ 5.31
10.6/ 13/ 9.38
.1/ 13/ .09
94.9/ 12/ .4330
14.1/ 12/ .0482
.5/ 43/ 42.17
.6/ 2/ .62
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
30.71
19.18
9.09
.3864
41.57
HC HASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
7.167
6.885
4598.07
51.307
1.455 ( 3.21)
6.47 ( 8.67)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.109 (
.827) (
.83)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUHBERS
P90-63 P90-64
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.065 (
•794) (
.79)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.979 .190
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
7.936 (
5.918) (
5.92)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.380
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.368 (
•274) (
.27)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.225 (
.370)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
6.47 (
8.67)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
711. (
530.)
P-J
-------
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
TEST JD-3.9-8H-8 RON
DATE 5/ 6/92 TIHE
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROHETER 745.0 HH HG (29.33 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 29.4 C (85.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIHE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFM)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOI SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METEH/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILOTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 78.0 F RH 43.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.9 G/KG
1
1200.2
32.58 (1150.5)
.04 ( 1.52)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
652.6 ( 23044.)
16.8/ 42/ 16.86
5.6/ 42/ 5.61
7.6/ 13/ 6.70
.4/ 13/ .35
44.4/ 13/ .0994
21.9/ 13/ .0466
.1/ 43/ 5.84
1.1/ 1/ .29
131.69
11.30
6.25
.0531
5.55
AH 62.9 GR/LB ENGINE DEW FT. 14.9 C (58.9 F)
76.1 GR/LB) NOX HUHIDITY C.F. 1.003
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .985
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
4.237
4.750
634.17
6.944
.206 ( .45)
.00 ( .00)
BSHC
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
******
(******) (*****)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-65 P90-66
BSCO
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
******
(******) (*****}
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (KG)
.677 .200
BSHOX
G/KW a
R (G/HP HR)
******
(******) (*****)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
.664
PART.
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
******
(******) (*****)
BSFC
KG/KW H
R (LB/HP HR)
******
(******)
WORK
KW H
R (HP HR)
.00
( .00)
BSC02
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
******
(**~***)
-8
-------
John Deere 3.9L Off Highway ISO 8178 8-Mode Test (#2) Data
08-4855-150 Test Date= 5-7-92
C:\123 R3\D ATA\J D39SS2
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 3.9L Off-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft—lb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
210
52
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
158
39
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
105
26
8
Idle
0
15%
850
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
9/hr
g/hr
g/hr
Q/hr
1
74
25.2
16.38
117.77
633.16
25.22
2
57
20.9
25.93
39.67
380.03
11.43
3
36
14.9
29.00
52.45
197.11
6.99
4
7
6.9
66.55
98.77
53.31
8.60
5
52
19.7
9.51
851.67
394.99
121.73
6
38
13.9
20.18
20.77
282.99
14.41
7
26
9.8
21.02
22.66
155.63
9.04
8
0
1.4
13.18
13.69
23.11
1.96
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
g/lb
g/ib
g/lb
g/lb
1
74
NA
0.65
4.67
25.13
1.00
2
57
NA
1.24
1.89
18.15
0.55
3
36
NA
1.94
3.52
13.22
0.47
4
7
NA
9.65
14.31
7.73
1.25
5
52
NA
0.48
43.20
20.04
6.17
6
38
NA
1.46
1.50
20.42
1.04
7
26
NA
2.14
2.30
15.82
0.92
8
0
NA
9.15
9.51
16.05
1.36
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
74
0.339
0.22
1.58
8.51
0.34
2
57
0.368
0.46
0.70
6.67
0.20
3
36
0.410
0.80
1.44
5.41
0.19
4
7
0.923
8.91
13.22
7.14
1.15
5
52
0.383
0.18
16.51
7.65
2.36
6
38
0.362
0.53
0.54
7.39
0.38
7
26
0.377
0.81
0.87
5.97
0.35
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
8-Mode
Weighted
0.384
0.65
3.54
7.30
0.592
-------
Test No.
/K/i *2-
2
DEPARTMENT OF EMISSIONS RESEARCH
ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND AMBIENT CONDITIONS
RAW DATA SHEET FOR HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL
SwRI Project No. " V # ~ Project Leader: ^
Test Operator-^Z^_2£^Cell No. ^ Engine I.D. - *7 Fuel CQte&ZLltJEzP "
Engine Configuration:
Measurement
Mode
n
Mode
W2
Mode
#3
Mode
U
Mode
#5
Mode
#6
Mode
m
Mode
#8
Torque (ft-Ib)
**7
310
tfT£
id<£
Speed (rpm)
oC
11*0 ,
'JI00
Mo*
Llo e?
Power (bhp)
3 9
KL C
7\?
61 k
V
Curt) Idle (rpm)
¦—
High Idle (rpm)
—
—
-—
Water Out (°F)
l4(>
)C70
/8^
Mi
m
/?'
W 3
\*)1
Water In (°F)
/9'?
/?9
\<7t>
/KO
Inlet Air (°F)
9?
9V
Of
lo
9*
99
is
Fuel (°F)
!o3
*7*7
100
Ip2
Exhaust (°F)
6 V
Hit
f/o£
$/&¦
£IC,
Intercooler In (°F)
—
—
—
—
Intercooler Out (°F)
—
—
•—
-—
—
Inlet Air Dewpouvt (°F)
CT.3
hf.^r
59.2T
SC.(*
f?,*
Chiller Water (°F)
6-Li
y
S"V
TV
Barometer (in. Hg)
&,6~(
MM
r
Xh.lt!
MM#
aw
Inlet Air Restrict, (in. H2O)
/f.X
fi'.f
9,0
<3.2
$3
Exhaust Restriction (in. Hg)
9 A
0
fS
!¦'
,4
, &
./
Fuel Flow (lbm/hr)
to.C
iS.t
Cfi
/V?
/2.S-
Oil Pressure (psig)
/~.r
(,£>
rr
f.f
•r £
Boost Pressure B-4 IC (psig)
—
-—-
Boost Press. After IC (psig)
—
—--
Vw. _
—
Engine Hours
13 no
m?.-)
/.I 111
/3VT
Co
0
S^
?>
Date
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT SO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-1 RUN 2
DATE 5/ 7/92 TIHE 1:24
COMPUTER PROGRAM EDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D
HCR 1.30
EH-1392-F
BAROMETER 748.5 MM HG (29.47 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 23.9 C (75.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIHE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
CELL: 76.0 F RH 38.0 PCT AH 52.0 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 9.2 G/KG ( 64.2 GR/LB)
1
600.1
32.74 (1155.9)
.05 ( 1.62)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
327.9 ( 11577.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 12.4 C (54.4
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .973
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
F)
EC SAHPLE
HC BCXGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RAMGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
17.2/ 42/ 17.18
2.9/ 42/ 2.90
56.4/ 13/ 53.38
.3/ 13/ .26
59.6/ 3/1.0364
2.2/ 3/ .0345
4.2/ 43/174.03
.4/ 3/ 1.04
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
12.84
14.50
51.43
1.0046
173.07
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
2.731
19.631
6025.38
105.544
1.906 ( 4.20)
9.25 ( 12.40)
asac
G/KK
HR
(G/HP HR)
.295 ( .220) (
.22)
(COOT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS
P90-67 P90-68
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
2.123 ( 1.583) (
1.58)
90 HM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
5.800 .073
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
11.414 ( 8.512) (
8.51)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
4.204
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.455 ( .339) (
.34)
BSPC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.206 ( .339)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
9.25 ( 12.40)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
652. ( 486.)
p-ll
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
TEST JD-3.9-8H-2 RON 2
DATE 5I 7/92 TINE 1:46
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT BO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 748.3 HM HG (29.46 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 23.3 C (74.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIHE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHM (SCFM)
TOT. 90MH RATE SCUM (SCFM)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
BC SAHPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NO! SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPH (U)
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PFH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
CELL: 73.0 F RH 46.0 PCT AE 57.0 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 9.5 G/KG ( 66.3 GR/LB)
1
600.0
32.77 (1157.2)
.04 ( 1.56)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
328.2 ( 11588.)
26.2/ 42/ 26.19
3.5/ 42/ 3.50
20.3/ 13/ 18.21
.4/ 13/ .35
89.7/ 11/ .8846
8.8/ 11/ .0527
2.5/ 43/103.92
.3/ 3/ .78
15.07
22.92
17.31
.8353
103.19
ENGINE DEW PT. 12.9 C (55.3 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .978
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
HC MASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (BP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
4.321
6.612
5014.79
63.338
1.583 ( 3.49)
7.08 ( 9.49)
BSHC
G/KW ER
(G/HP HR)
.611 (
.455) (
.46)
(CONT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS
P90-69 P90-70
BSOO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.934 (
.697) (
.70)
90 HM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.414 .145
BSNOX
G/KW ER
(G/HP HR)
8.950 (
6.674) (
6.67)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
1.905
PART.
G/KW ER
(G/HP HR)
.269 (
.201) (
.20)
BSFC
KG/KWER
(LB/HP HR)
.224 (
.368)
WORK
KW ER
(EP HR)
7.08 (
9.49)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP ER)
709. (
528.)
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CIDt 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-3 RON 2
DATE 5/ 7/92 TIME 2:11
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 748.3 HH HG (29.46 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 21.7 C (71.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM (SCFH)
TOT. AOL SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOS STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
EC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NO! SAHPLE
KOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RAHGE/PPH
CELL: 70.0 F RH 68.0 PCT AH 76.0 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 9.7 G/KG ( 67.8 GR/LB)
1
1200.0
32.75 (1156.2)
.04 ( 1.55)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
655.8 ( 23155.)
29.0/ 42/ 28.99
3.5/ 42/ 3.50
26.4/ 13/ 23.88
.21 13/ .17
73.3/ 11/ .6504
9.9I 11/ .0597
.6/ 43/ 53.86
.5/ 2/ .52
ENGINE DEW PT. 13.3 C (55.9 F)
NOI HUMIDITY C.F. .982
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .977
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
20.44
25.66
22.90
.5936
53.37
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.666
17.482
7121.29
65.703
2.256 ( 4.97)
9.05 ( 12.14)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSBC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.068 ( .796) I
: -80)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-71 P90-72
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.931 ( 1.440) 1
[ 1.44)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 2.885 .226
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
7.258 ( 5.412) 1
[ 5.41)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 2.331
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.257 ( .192) I
[ .19)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.249 ( .410)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
9.05 ( 12.14)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
787. ( 587.)
j>-/3
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
TEST JD-3.9-8H-4 RON 2
DATE 5/ 7/92 TIHE 2:48
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT i.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROHETER 747.5 HM HG (29.43 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 21.1 C (70.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SOW (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (H)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 70.0 F RH 68.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.3 G/KG
1
1200.0
32.74 (1156.2)
.05 ( 1.61)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
655.8 ( 23156.)
62.4/ 42/ 62.49
3.7/ 42/ 3.70
47.8/ 13/ 44.63
.3/ 13/ .26
75.7/ 12/ .3214
16.4/ 12/ .0566
.2/ 43I 14.54
1.0/ 1/ .27
40.36
58.88
43.12
.2662
14.28
\E 76.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.2 C (57.5 F)
72.0 GR/LB) NOX HUHIDITY C.F. .992
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
22.184
32.923
3193.42
17.771
1.042 ( 2.30)
1.86 ( 2.49)
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
11.947 ( 8.909)
( 8.91)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-73 P90-74
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
17.731 (13.222)
(13.22)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 3.327 .657
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
9.571 ( 7.137)
( 7.14)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST 2.868
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.545 ( 1.152)
( 1-15)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.561 ( .923)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
1.86 ( 2.49)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1720. ( 1282.)
}-li
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-5 RON 2
DATE 5/7/92 TIME 3:23
COHPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CAST 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HQ 1.30
BAROHETER 747.3 HH HG (29.42 IN HG) CELL: 70.0 F RH 68.0 PCT AH 76.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.7 C (56.6 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 24.4 C (76.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.0 G/KG ( 69.7 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .986
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .975
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER
1
TIME SECONDS
210.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.73 (1155.7)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.52)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRESfSCF)
114.7 ( 4050.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
12.1/ 42/ 12.08
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.9/ 42/ 3.90
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
84.0/ 11/386.95
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 11/ .53
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
84.41 11/ .8037
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.7/ 11/ .0521
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
7.3/ 43/106.73
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 3/ .26
DILUTION FACTOR
15.91
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
8.42
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
372.04
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.7549
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
106.49
BC MASS GRAHS
.555
CO HASS GRAHS
49.681
C02 HASS GRAHS
1584.06
NOX HASS GRAHS
23.041
FUEL KG (LB)
.523 ( 1.15)
KW HK (HP HR)
2.24 ( 3.01)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.247 ( .184)
( -18)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-75 P90-76
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
22.134 (16.505)
(16.51)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 9.251 .071
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
10.265 ( 7.655)
( 7.65)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 7.101
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
3.164 ( 2.359)
( 2.36)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.233 ( .383)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
2.24 ( 3.01)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
706. ( 526.)
J)-IS'
-------
EHGIHE EMISSION RESDLTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE MM®
EMGI2IE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 LI239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-6 RON 2
DATE 5/ 7/92 TIME 3:23
COHPCTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
ECR 1.30
BAROMETER 747.0 MH HG (29.41 IN HG) CELL: 70.0 F RH 68.0 PCT AH 76.1 GR/LB
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.0 C (77.0) ENGINE ABS. SDH. 9.3 G/KG I 65.2 GR/LB)
BAG RESDLTS
BAG HOHBER 1
TIME SECONDS
1200.2
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.64 (1152.7)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.54)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRES(SCF)
653.9 ( 23088.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
21.2/ 42/ 21.26
BC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.5/ 42/ 3.50
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.1/ 13/ 9.83
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 13/ .44
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
69.4/ 11/ .6011
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.1/ 11/ .0483
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 77.76
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RAHGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
22.18
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
17.91
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
9.10
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.5549
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
77.36
HC MASS GRAHS
6.729
CO MASS GRAHS
6.924
C02 HASS GRAMS
6638.01
NOX HASS GRAHS
94.347
FUEL KG (LB)
2.096 ( 4.62)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.52 ( 12.76)
TOTAL RESDLTS
BSHC
G/KW HH
(G/HP HR)
.707 ( .527) {
¦53)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-77 P90-78
BSOO
G/KB HR
(G/HP HR)
.728 ( .543) (
.54)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
6.188 .208
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.915 ( 7.394) (
7.39)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
4.804
PART.
G/KH HR
(G/HP HR)
.505 ( .377) (
.38)
BSFC
KG/KW ER
(LB/HP HR)
.220 ( .362)
ifORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
9.52 ( 12.76)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
698. ( 520.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 12.7 C (54.8 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .975
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .977
P-Ii,
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE HODEl 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID\ 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-7 RON 2
DATE 5/7/92 TIHE
COMPUTER PROGRAH HOT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EN-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 746.8 MM HG (29.40 IN HG) CELL: 75.0 F RH 38.0 PCT AH 49.4 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.7 C (56.6 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0) ENGINE ABS. HUM. 10.0 G/KG ( 69.7 GR/LB) HOX HUMIDITY C.F. .987
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .985
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIHE SECONDS
1200.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.71 (1154.9)
TOT. 90MH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.53)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRESfSCF) "
655.0 ( 23129.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
22.1/ 42/ 22.10
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.6/ 42/ 3.60
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.6/ 13/ 10.28
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 13/ .17
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
55.6/ 11/ .4427
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.8/ 11/ .0527
HOX SAHPLE HETER/RAKGE/PPH (W)
.5/ 43/ 42.28
NOI BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 2/ .31
DILUTION FACTOR
30.05
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
18.62
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
9.90
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.3917
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
41.98
HC MASS GRAHS
7.007
CO MASS GRAHS
7.552
CQ2 MASS GRAHS
4694.08
NOX HASS GRAHS
51.878
FUEL KG (LB)
1.486 ( 3.28)
HR (HP HE)
6.48 ( 8.69)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.081 (
.806) (
.81)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-79 P90-80
BSGO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.165 (
.869) (
.87)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.285 .705
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
8.006 (
5.970) (
5.97)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
3.012
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.465 (
.347) (
• 35)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.229 (
.377)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
6.48 (
8.69)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
724. (
540.)
>/?
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4039D
ENGINE 3.9 L(239. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-3.9-8H-8 RUN 2
DATE 5/ 7/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROHETER 747.0 HH HG (29.41 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 26.1 C (79.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
THE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
ffOX BCKGRD
KETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 73.0 F RH 43.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HOH. 10.3 G/KG
1
1200.0
32.68 (1154.1)
.04 ( 1.57)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
654.6 ( 23113.)
14.9/ 42/ 14.96
3.3/ 42/ 3.30
7.2/ 13/ 6.34
.3/ 13/ .26
46.4/ 13/ .1043
22.8/ 13/ .0487
.1/ 43/ 6.39
.7/ 1/ .19
125.87
11.68
5.99
.0561
6.20
AH 52.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.1 C (57.4 F)
71.8 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .992
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .987
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
4.392
4.563
671.36
7.703
.218 ( .48)
.00 ( .00)
BSHC
G/KW I
R i'G/HP HR)
******
(******)
(*****) (COHT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-81 P90-82
BSCO
G/KW E
R (G/HP HR)
******
ft*****)
(*~***)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
.719 .167
BSHOX
G/KW I
R (G/HP HR)
******
(******)
I*****) (COHT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
.654
PART.
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
******
(*****«}
(*****)
BSFC
KG/KW I
R (LB/HP HR)
******
(******)
WORK
KW I
R (HP HR)
.00
( .00)
BSC02
G/KW I
R (G/HP HR)
******
(***~**)
J>-/8
-------
APPENDIX E
TRANSIENT TEST RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D NONROAD ENGINE
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-TC2 RON
DATE 5/21/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROHETER 742.7 HH HG (29.24 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.0 C (77.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 75.0 F RB 59.0 PCT AB 78.1 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.5 G/KG ( 80.6 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.8 C (60.4 F)
NOX HUHIDITY C.F. 1.015
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.8
300.1
305.9
306.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.61 (1151.4)
32.62 (1151.6)
32.50 (1147.5)
32.61 (1151.5)
TOT. 90MH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.55)
.04 ( 1.55)
.04 ( 1.55)
.04 ( 1.55)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
161.0 ( 5684.)
163.3 ( 5768.)
165.9 ( 5858.)
166.5 ( 5881.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
12.0/ 43/ 24.23
15;9/ 43/ 32.04
21.1/ 43/ 42.57
12.7/ 43/ 25.61
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
4.4/ 43/ 8.84
4.4/ 43/ 8.84
4.3/ 43/ 8.64
4.0/ 43/ 8.04
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
21.7/ 13/ 19.50
19.9/ 13/ 17.84
25.5/ 13/ 23.04
11.0/ 13/ 9.74
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 13/ .17
.3/ 13/ .26
.5/ 13/ .44
.4/ 13/ .35
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
39.7/ 11/ .2873
43.8/ 11/ .3248
71.7/ 11/ .6299
33.9/ 11/ .2369
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
10.3/ 11/ .0623
10.8/ 11/ .0655
11.6/ 11/ .0707
10.0/ 11/ .0604
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.1/ 43/ 21.94
1.2/ 43/ 24.53
2.5/ 43/ 53.89
.9/ 43/ 18.58
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
.3/ 2/ .31
.3/ 2/ .31
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
45.95
40.63
21.06
55.74
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
15.58
23.41
34.34
17.72
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
18.86
17.14
21.92
9.18
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2263
.2609
.5625
.1776
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
21.53
24.23
53.59
18.17
HC HASS GRAMS
1.441
2.197
3.273
1.695
CO HASS GRAHS
3.534
3.260
4.234
1.779
C02 HASS GRAMS
666.46
779.72
1707.38
541.06
NOX MASS GRAHS
6.726
7.679
17.254
5.873
FUEL KG (LB)
.213 ( .47)
.249 ( .55)
.542 ( 1.19)
.173 ( .38)
KW HR (HP HR)
.48 ( .65)
.69 ( .92)
2.06 ( 2.76)
.49 ( .66)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HH)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.313 ( 1.725)
3.442 ( 2.566)
(
(
10.086
.961
.316 (
3.72 (
993. (
7.521)
.717)
.520)
4.99)
740.)
( 1.72)
( 2.57)
( 7.52)
( -72)
(CONT) 90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
(CONT) PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
P90-105 P90-106
4.507 .291
3.577
£-1
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
SOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-TH1 RON
DATE 5/21/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.4 MM EG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP- 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 75.0 F RH 59.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.8 G/KG
AH 78.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 16.1 C (61.0 F)
82.4 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.020
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAT
NYNF
TIME SECONDS
295.7
300.1
305.1
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.52 (1148.4)
32.52 (1148.2)
32.52 (1148.2)
32.55 (1149.3)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
160.5 ( 5667.)
162.9 ( 5751.)
165.6 ( 5846.)
166.2 ( 5867.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
24.3/ 42/ 24.33
31.8/ 42/ 31.80
42.5/ 42/ 42.57
26.4/ 42/ 26.39
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
9.5/ 42/ 9.51
9.9/ 42/ 9.91
9.8/ 42/ 9.81
9.3/ 42/ 9.31
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
11.3/ 13/ 10.01
14.3/ 13/ 12.72
23.9/ 13/ 21.54
10.4/ 13/ 9.20
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 13/ .17
.2/ 13/ .17
.1/ 13/ .09
.1/ 13/ .09
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
35.6/ 11/ .2513
40.7/ 11/ .2963
69.8/ 11/ .6060
33.0/ 11/ .2293
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
12.5/ 11/ .0767
10.7/ 11/ .0649
12.6/ 11/ .0773
11.2/ 11/ .0681
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.28
1.1/ 43/ 22.51
2.5/ 43/ 53.02
.9/ 43/ 18.14
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
.2/ 2/ .21
.4/ 2/ .42
.4/ 2/ .42
DILUTION FACTOR
52.60
44.56
21.88
57.54
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
15.00
22.11
33.21
17.24
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
9.61
12.24
20.81
8.90
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1761
.2328
.5323
.1624
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
17.77
22.31
52.62
17.73
HC MASS GRAMS
1.383
2.069
3.159
1.646
CO MASS GRAMS
1.795
2.321
4.011
1.722
C02 MASS GRAMS
517.13
693.76
1612.16
493.65
NOX MASS GRAHS
5.561
7.083
16.987
5.745
FUEL KG (LB)
.165 ( .36)
.221 ( .49)
.512 ( 1.13)
.158 ( .35)
KW HR (HP HR).
.48 ( .64)
.69 ( .92)
2.08 ( 2.79)
.48 ( .64)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
2.219 ( 1.655)
(
1.65)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-107 P90-108
BSCO G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
2.647 ( 1.974)
(
1.97)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.128 .300
BSNOX G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
9.507 ( 7.089)
(
7.09)
(COHT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.618
PART. G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.704 ( .525)
(
.52)
BSFC KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.284 ( .466)
WORK KW
HR
(HP HR)
3.72 ( 4.99)
BSC02 G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
891. ( 665.)
-------
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
TEST JD-4.5-TH2 RON
DATE 5/21/92 TIHE 11:01
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 742.4 HH HG (29.23 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.1 C (79.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 75.0 F RH 59.0 PCT Afl 78.1 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.4 G/KG ( 79.7 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.6 C (60.1 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
KYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.9
300.0
305.1
306.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.59 (1150.9)
32.60 (1151.3)
32.60 (1151.1)
32.60 (1151.1)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCMM (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
.04 ( 1.51)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
161.0 ( 5683.)
163.2 ( 5764.)
166.0 ( 5861.)
166.5 ( 5878.)
HC SAKPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
24.8/ 42/ 24.85
32.2/ 42/ 32.24
42.5/ 42/ 42.57
26.8/ 42/ 26.85
BC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
9.2/ 42/ 9.21
9-.2/ 42/ 9.21
9.1/ 42/ 9.11
9.1/ 42/ 9.11
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
11.5/ 13/ 10.19
14.2/ 13/ 12.63
23.6/ 13/ 21.27
9.6/ 13/ 8.49
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 13/ .35
.1/ 13/ .09
.3/ 13/ .26
.2/ 13/ .17
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
34.1/ 11/ .2386
40.8/ 11/ .2972
70.8/ 11/ .6185
32.8/ 11/ .2277
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
10.5/ 11/ .0636
11.7/ 11/ .0714
13.7/ 11/ .0846
12.7/ 11/ .0780
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 18.00
1.1/ 43/ 22.42
2.5/ 43/ 52.30
.8/ 43/ 17.73
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 2/ .42
.3/ 2/ .31
.4/ 2/ .42
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
55.36
44.42
21.44
57.96
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
15.80
23.24
33.89
17.90
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
9.62
12.24
20.37
8.12
002 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1761
.2274
.5378
.1510
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
17.59
22.12
51.90
17.22
HC MASS GRAHS
1.461
2.180
3.232
1.712
CO MASS GRAMS
1.802
2.325
3.936
1.574
C02 MASS GRAMS
518.58
679.07
1633.29
460.02
NOX HASS GRAHS
5.482
6.990
16.682
5.551
FUEL KG (LB)
.165 ( .36)
.217 ( .48)
.518 ( 1.14)
.147 ( .32)
KW HR (HP HR)
.48 ( .64)
.68 ( .91)
2.07 ( 2.77)
.47 ( .63)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.326 (
; 1.734) ( 1.73) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-109 P90-110
ESCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.611 ( 1.947) ( 1.95)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 3.158 .287
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
9.402 I
; 7.011) ( 7.01) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
2.633
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
.713 1
: .532) ( .53)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.284 |
: -467)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.69 |
: 4.95)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
892. (
: 665.)
£-3
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COMPOSITE
TEST JD-4.5-TH1 RON
DATE 5/21/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM EOT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 742.4 MM HG (29.23 IN HG) CELL: 75.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 78.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 16.1 C (61.0 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.8 G/KG ( 82.4 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.020
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLD AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
2.232
( 1.665)
(
1.66)
BSFC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
¦ 288 (
.474)
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
2.760
( 2.058)
(
2.06)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
906. (
675.)
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
9.590
( 7.151)
(
7.15)
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
.740
( -552)
(
• 55)
£-4
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COLD-TRANS
TEST JD-4.5-TC4 RON
DATE 5/25/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROHETER 740.7 MM DG (29.16 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.1 C (79.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 77.0 F RH 60.0 PCT AH 85.3 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.7 G/KG ( 82.0 GR/LB)
ENGINE DEW PT. 16.0 C [60.8 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.018
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANP
LAF
NYNF
TIHE SECONDS
295.3
300.0
304.9
305.9
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.46 <1146.3)
32.47 (1146.3)
32.48 (1146.7)
32.47 (1146.6)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.52)
.04 ( 1.52)
.04 ( 1.52)
.04 ( 1.52)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.G0( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF1
160.0 ( 5649.)
162.5 ( 5739.)
165.2 ( 5835.)
165.8 ( 5854.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
12.7/ 43/ 25.66
16.1/ 43/ 32.53
20.6/ 43/ 41.56
12.4/ 43/ 25.05
HC BCKCRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
3.9/ 43/ 7.84
3.9/ 43/ 7.84
3.7/ 43/ 7.43
3.5/ 43/ 7.03
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
20.5/ 13/ 18.39
18.9/ 13/ 16.92
25.5/ 13/ 23.04
10.2/ 13/ 9.02
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.0/ 13/ .00
.0/ 13/ .00
.4/ 13/ .35
1.0/ 13/ .87
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
63.7/ 12/ .2596
71.5/ 12/ .2992
68.8/ 11/ .5937
54.6/ 12/ .2159
002 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
13.7/ 12/ .0468
13.7/ 12/ .0468
7.8/ 11/ .0465
13.7/ 12/ .0468
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
1.0/ 43/ 20.27
1.1/ 43/ 23.82
2.5/ 43/ 53.48
.9/ 43/ 18.09
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.8/ 1/ .21
1.0/ 1/ .27
.4/ 2/ .42
.9/ 1/ .24
DILUTION FACTOR
50.76
44.07
22.33
61.11
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
17.97
24.88
34.46
18.13
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
17.95
16.50
22.01
7.97
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2137
.2535
.5493
.1699
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
20.06
23.56
53.08
17.85
HC MASS GRAMS
1.652
2.323
3.272
1.727
CO MASS GRAMS
3.343
3.122
4.234
1.538
C02 MASS GRAMS
625.56
753.66
1660.57
515.12
NOX HASS GRAHS
6.251
7.458
17.085
5.765
FUEL KG (LB)
.200 ( .44)
.241 ( .53)
.527 ( 1.16)
.164 ( .36)
KW HR (HP HR)
.49 ( .66)
.69 ( .92)
2.07 ( 2.77)
.48 ( .65)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.407 ( 1.795) ( 1.79) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-117 P90-U8
BSCO G/KH HR (G/HP HR)
3.282 (
2.447) ( 2.45)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 1
5.081 .289
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
9.805 ( 7.312) ( 7.31) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
4.057
PAW. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.088 (
.311) ( .81)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.304 (
.499)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.73 (
5.00)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
953. (
711.)
t-5
-------
ENGINE EHISSIOH RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 LI275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-TH4 RON
DATE 5/25/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-P
HCR 1.30
BAROHETER 739.9 HH HG (29.13 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 27.2 C (81.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
THE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SOT)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCMH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. HETRES(SCF)
CELL: 77.0 F RB 60.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.5 G/KG
AB 85.4 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.3 C (57.8 F)
( 73.6 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .996
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
EC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RAKGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
KETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
1
HYNF
295.3
32.51 (1148.0)
.04 ( 1.49)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
160.2 ( 5657.)
22.4/ 42/ 22.41
7.9/ 42/ 7.91
11.9/ 13/ 10.55
.0/ 13/ .00
55.5/ 12/ .2201
13.9/ 12/ .0475
.9/ 43/ 18.10
1.2/ 1/ .32
59.99
14.63
10.30
.1734
17.79
2
LANF
300.0
32.50 (1147.7)
.04 ( 1.49)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
162.7 ( 5746.)
29.9I 42/ 29.89
7.9/ 42/ 7.91
14.9I 13/ 13.27
.1/ 13/ .09
66.3/ 12/ .2726
13.1/ 12/ .0446
1.1/ 43/ 22.51
.9/ 1/ .24
48.40
22.14
12.86
.2289
22.27
3
LAF
305.0
32.51 (1148.0)
.04 ( 1.49)
,00( .0)
.00 ( .00)
165.5 ( 5843.)
41.3/ 42I 41.31
7.9/ 42/ 7.91
25.2/ 13/ 22.76
.0I 13/ .00
70.0/ 11/ .6085
8.5I 11I .0509
2.5/ 43/ 52.75
.3/ 2/ .31
21.79
33.76
22.06
.5600
52.45
4
NYNF
305.9
32.51 (1147.9)
.04 ( 1.49)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
166.0 ( 5860.)
9.56
.26
2061
0454
25.2/ 42/ 25.26
7.1/ 42/ 7.11
10.8/ 13/
•3/ 13/
52.5/ 12/
13.3/ 12/
.9/ 43/ 18.10
.8/ 1/ .21
63.93
18.26
9.09
.1615
17.89
BC HASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAMS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
1.347
1.922
508.16
5.429
.162 ( .36)
.48 ( .64)
2.070
2.436
681.28
6.906
.217 ( .48)
.68 ( .91)
3.210
4.249
1695.31
16.538
.538 ( 1.19)
2.07 ( 2.78)
1.741
1.756
490.29
5.657
.157 ( .35)
.48 ( .65)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
2.253 ( 1.680)
( 1.68)
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
2.790 ( 2.081)
( 2.08)
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.298 ( 6.934)
( 6.93)
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.796 ( .593)
( .59)
BSFC
KG/KR HR
(LB/HP BR)
.289 ( .475)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
3.71 ( 4.98)
BSG02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
909. ( 678.)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
90 HH FILTER »T. GAINS (HG)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
P90-119 P90-120
3.554 .266
2.956
£-6
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
HOT-TRANS
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.6-TH5 RUN
DATE 5/25/92 TIME 12:09
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
ECR 1.80
BAROHETER 740.2 HH HG (29.14 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 27.2 C (81.0)
BAG RESULTS
CELL: 77.0 F RH 56.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUM. 10.6 G/KG
AE 80.1 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.5 C (58.1 F)
[ 74.4 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .998
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .980
BAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DESCRIPTION
NYNF
LANF
LAF
NYNF
TIME SECONDS
296.1
300.0
305.2
306.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.49 (1147.4)
32.52 (1148.2)
32.47 (1146.5)
32.49 (1147.2)
TOT. 90KH RATE SCHM (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.48)
.04 ( 1.48)
.04 ( 1.48)
.04 ( 1.48)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCUM (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .0)
.00( .0)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
160.6 ( 5670.)
162.8 ( 5748.)
165.4 ( 5840.)
166.0 ( 5860.)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
22.4/ 42/ 22.44
30.5/ 42/ 30.51
41.8/ 42/ 41.85
25.3/ 42/ 25.29
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.7/ 42/ 6.71
6.4/ 42/ 6.41
6.5/ 42/ 6.51
6.2/ 42/ 6.21
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
10.6/ 13/ 9.38
13.4/ 13/ 11.91
23.6/ 13/ 21.27
10.3/ 13/ 9.11
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.9/ 13/ .79
.2/ 13/ .17
.1/ 13/ .09
.2/ 13/ .17
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
56.4/ 12/ .2243
64.5/ 12/ .2636
70.5/ 11/ .6148
54.2/ 12/ .2140
002 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
13.8/ 12/ .0472
13.3/ 12/ .0454
8.7/ 11/ .0521
15.2/ 12/ .0522
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.9/ 43/ 17.90
1.1/ 43/ 22.26
2.5/ 43/ 52.03
.8/ 43/ 17.68
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
1.0/ 1/ .27
.5/ 1/ .13
.3/ 2/ .31
.9/ 1/ .24
DILUTION FACTOR
58.90
50.04
21.58
61.63
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
15.85
24.24
35.64
19.18
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
8.41
11.46
20.55
8.74
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.1780
.2191
.5651
.1626
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
17.64
22.13
51.73
17.44
HC MASS GRAKS
1.462
2.267
3.387
1.829
CO HASS GRAMS
1.573
2.172
3.957
1.689
C02 HASS GRAKS
522.81
652.61
1709.65
493.80
KOX HASS GRAMS
5.407
6.878
16.334
5.527
FUEL KG (LB)
.167 ( .37)
.208 ( .46)
.543 ( 1.20)
.158 ( .35)
KW HR (BP HR)
.48 ( .65)
.69 ( .92)
2.07 ( 2.77)
.48 ( .64)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.409 (
1.796) ( 1.80) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS P90-121 P90-122
BSCO G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
2.529 (
1.886) ( 1.89)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) <
1.138 .267
BSNOX G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
9.195 (
6.857) ( 6.86) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
3.419
PART. G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
.921 (
.687) ( .69)
BSFC KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.290 (
.476)
WORK KW HR (HP HR)
3.71 (
4.98)
BSC02 G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
910. (
678.)
-------
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGIBE HODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE OCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
COMPOSITE
TEST JD-4.5-TH4 RON
DATE 5/25/92 TIME
COHPOTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-P
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 739.9 HH HG (29.13 IN EG) CELL: 77.0 P RH 60.0 PCT AH 85.4 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.3 C (57.8 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 27.2 C (81.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.5 G/KG ( 73.6 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .996
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .979
COMPOSITE TEST RESULTS,COLD AND HOT CYCLES
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
2.275
( 1.697)
(
1.70)
BSFC G/KW K
R (G/HP HR)
.291 ( .479)
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
2.861
( 2.133)
(
2.13)
BSC02 G/KH H
R (G/HP HR)
915. ( 682.)
BSNOX
G/KH HR
(G/HP
HR)
9.371
( 6.988)
(
6.99)
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP
HR)
.838
( .625)
(
.62)
-8
-------
APPENDIX F
TRANSIENT TEOM FIGURES FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D NONROAD ENGINE
-------
FIGURE F1. JD-4.5-TC2 TEOM DATA
Seconds
-------
y
JO
O)
E
25
20
CD
| 15
o
1q
i3
O
10
FIGURE F2. JD-4.5-TH1 TEOM DATA
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200
Seconds
-------
FIGURE F3. JD-4.5-TH2 TEOM DATA
25-,
20
CD
CD
O
!q
13
o
E
15
10
\
Ca)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200
Seconds
-------
FIGURE F4. TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #1 TEOM
Seconds
JD-4.5-TC2 JD-4.5-TH1 — JD-4.5-TH2
-------
FIGURE F5. JD-4.5-TC4 TEOM DATA
"n Seconds
-------
1
<3\
O
• MM
£2
3
o
O)
E
25
20
15
10
FIGURE F6. JD-4.5-TH4 TEOM DATA
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 100011001200
Seconds
-------
FIGURE F7. JD-4.5-TH5 TEOM DATA
~n Seconds
\
-------
FIGURE F8. TRANSIENT SEQUENCE #2 TEOM
Seconds
JD-4.5-TC4 JD-4.5-TH4 JD-4.5-TH5
-------
APPENDIX G
EIGHT-MODE STEADY-STATE RESULTS FOR JOHN DEERE 4045D
NONROAD ENGINE
-------
John Deere 4.5L Off Highway ISO 8178 8-Mode Test (#1) Data
08-4855-150 TestDate= 5-26-92
C:\123R3\DATA\JD45SS1
ISO 8-Mode Test Points John Deere 4.5L Off-Highway
Weighting Speed Torque
Mode Speed Load % Factor rpm ft—lb BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
100
10%
1,300
220
54
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
165
41
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
110
27
8
Idle
0
15%
770
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
9/hr
g/hr
q/hr
q/hr
1
75
26.2
31.16
136.74
388.51
29.31
2
56
20.6
42.43
65.81
288.17
14.89
3
38
16.2
45.84
84.18
207.70
14.57
4
8
7.5
62.22
88.14
95.91
10.91
5
54
18.5
24.22
40.17
399.33
32.09
6
41
13.8
24.41
19.67
283.48
6.67
7
27
10.0
27.42
27.40
184.53
6.91
8
0
1.5
21.55
13.56
18.64
4.90
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
g/ib
g/ib
g/lb
q/lb
1
75
NA
1.19
5.23
14.85
1.12
2
56
NA
2.06
3.19
13.96
0.72
3
38
NA
2.84
5.21
12.85
0.90
4
8
NA
8.30
11.75
12.79
1.46
5
54
NA
1.31
2.17
21.57
1.73
6
41
NA
1.77
1.43
20.54
0.48
7
27
NA
2.75
2.75
18.53
0.69
8
0
NA
14.37
9.04
12.43
3.26
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
q/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
75
0.349
0.42
1.82
5.18
0.39
2
56
0.372
0.76
1.18
5.19
0.27
3
38
0.424
1.20
2.21
5.44
0.38
4
8
0.966
8.01
11.35
12.34
1.40
5
54
0.343
0.45
0.74
7.37
0.59
6
41
0.338
0.60
0.48
6.95
0.16
7
27
0.366
1.01
1.00
6.77
0.25
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
8-Mode
Weighted
0.382
0.91
1.63
6.05
0.397
-------
DEPARTMENT OF EMISSIONS RESEARCH
ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND AMBIENT CONDITIONS
ftoa 7^/ RAW DATA SHEET FOR HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL
Test No. / SwRI Project No. 5~/T-ib o Project Leader: ^^ r ^ A
Test Operator:>241A Cell No k. Engine I.D. ^ ^ Fuel Code£$!£Z2^2
Engine Configuration:
Measurement
Mode
Ml
Mode
#2
Mode
#3
Mode
#4
Mode
#5
Mode
#6
Mode
m
Mode
its
Torque (ft-lb)
m
!$
Uc
t/O
<(D
Speed (rpm)
to*>0
Ue#
fle>
lie?
\3r> 0
%n
Power (bhp)
I ?/T
a
£**.(,
Hi
f?
Curb Idle (rpm)
High Idle (rpm)
—
Water Out (°F)
&G
rfu
)^o
/??
Water In (°F)
/IC
j%9
/Qf
l%%
!%t
Oil (°F)
3'%
bio
m
At> 1
Inlet Air (°F)
*)0
*>/
(tft
fit
?5
!h~2
/7-5?
to.0
Oil Pressure (pag)
LD
60
La
/rr
Boost Pressure B-4 1C (psig)
—
Boost Press. After IC (psig)
—
.—
—
¦—
—
Engine Hours
UK.1
13^.0
»3
mn.x
f.1. 9&I
t64h,st
/0m,A
Affshtn
SB*.*
iD'h, ">
"fiCsP.S)
3.6 1* .M
Date
G
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE SOMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H1 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TINE 9:02
COMPUTER PROGRAM SET l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 740.9 MM HG (29.17 IN HG) CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 81.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.7 C (60.3 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 21.1 C (70.0| ENGINE ABS. EDM. 11.5 G/KG ( 80.5 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.014
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .971
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TDK SECONDS
600.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.42 (1144.9)
TOT. 90KH RATE SCHH (SCW)
.04 < 1.54)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
324.7 ( 11466.;
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
34.7/ 42/ 34.74
HC BCKGRD METER/RAHGE/PPM
7.5/ 42/ 7.51
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPN
65.6/ 13/ 63.05
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 13/ .26
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
62.6/ 3/1.0950
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
3.0/ 3/ .0471
mi SAMPLE KETYB/RMGE/PFH W
2.5/ tt/lM.52
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 3/ .7B
DILUTION FACTOR
12.13
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
27.85
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
60.30
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
1.0517
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
102.81
HC HASS GRAMS
5.195
CO HASS GRAMS
22.794
002 HASS GRAMS
6247.80
NOX HASS GRAMS
64.763
FUEL KG (LB)
1.980 ( 4.36)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.33 ( 12.51)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.557 (
.415) (
.42)
(CONT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS
P90-127 P90-128
BSCO
G/KW
BR
(G/HP HR)
2.443 <
1.822) (
1.82)
90 MM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
6.430 .149
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
6.942 (
5.177) (
5.18)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
4.886
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.524 (
•391) (
•39)
BSFC
KG/KB
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.212 (
.349)
WORK
KB
HR
(HP HR)
9.33 (
12.51)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP ER)
670. (
499.)
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NOHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H2 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIHE 9:25
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.9 HH HG (29.17 IN HG) CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 81.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.9 C (58.9 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 21.1 C (70.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.9 G/KG ( 76.5 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.004
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .973
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIHE SECONDS
600.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCPH)
32.43 (1145.1)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.50)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SC7H)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. ADX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
324.7 ( 11466.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
46.2/ 42/ 46.23
EC BCKGRD KETER/RAHGE/PPH
8.91 421 8.91
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
33.3/ 13/ 30.42
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 13/ .35
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
89.1/ 11/ .8751
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.2/ 11/ .0490
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (»)
1.9/ 43/ 77.53
NOX BCKGRD KETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
15.18
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
37.90
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
29.02
002 CONCENTRATION PCT
.8294
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
77.05
HC MASS GRAMS
7.071
CO MASS GRAMS
10.968
C02 MASS GRAMS
4926.88
NOX MASS GRAMS
48.028
FUEL KG (LB)
1.561 ( 3.44)
KW HR (HP HR)
6.91 ( 9.26)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.024 (
.764) I
! .76)
(COHT)
90 MM FILTER NUMBERS P90-129 P90-130
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.588 (
1.184) |
1 1-18)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG) 3.001 .241
BSBOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
6.955 (
5.187) |
: 5.19)
(COST)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST 2.481
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.359 (
•268) |
: .27)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.226 (
.372)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
6.91 (
9.26)
ESC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
714. (
532.)
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE HUHBER
ENGINE KODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 LI275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H3 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIME 9:55
COHPUTER PROGRAH HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.9 HH HG (29.17 IN EG) CELL: 76.0 F RB 59.0 PCT AH 81.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 13.9 C (57.1 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 20.0 C (68.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.2 G/KG ( 71.6 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .991
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER 1
TIME SECONDS 1200.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH) 32.41 (1144.5)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH) .04 ( 1.45)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF) 649.1 ( 22921.)
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .975
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
48.3/ 42/ 48.37
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
7.8/ 42/ 7.81
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
41.5/ 13/ 38.38
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.0/ 13/ .00
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
76.6/ 11/ .6939
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.2/ 11/ .0490
SOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.7/ 43/ 56.76
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
19.08
BC CONCENTRATION PPM
40.98
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
37.14
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.6475
BOX CONCENTRATION PPH
56.27
HC HASS GRAMS 15.281
CO HASS GRAMS 28.064
C02 MASS GRAMS 7689.49
NOX HASS GRAMS 69.240
FUEL KG (LB) 2.445 ( 5.39)
KW HR (HP HR) 9.49 ( 12.72)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
1.611 ( 1.201)
( 1.20)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-131 P90-132
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
2.959 ( 2.206)
( 2.21)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
5.875 .284
BSBOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
7.300 ( 5.443)
( 5.44)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
4.857
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.512 ( .382)
( .38)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.258 ( .424)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
9.49 ( 12.72)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
811. ( 605.)
G-5
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8M4 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAH HOT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCB 1.80
BAPOHETER 740.9 HH EG (29.17 IN HG) CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT AH 81.7 GR/LB
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 20.0 C (68.0) ENGINE ABS. HUN. 11.5 G/KG ( 80.2 GR/LB)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIME SECONDS
1200.1
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.52 (1148.2)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.53)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SOW (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE SATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
651.3 ( 22997.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
52.9/ 42/ 62.95
BC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
7.7/ 42/ 7.71
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
43.7/ 13/ 40.54
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.9/ 13/ .79
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
45.5/ 11/ .3409
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RAHGE/PCT
8.1/ 11/ .0483
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.3/ 43/ 25.93
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.6/ 2/ .62
DILUTION FACTOR
38.16
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
55.44
00 CONCENTRATION PPH
38.76
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.2939
BOX CONCENTRATtOH PPH
25.32
HC HASS GRAMS
20.743
CO HASS GRAMS
29.384
C02 HASS GRAMS
3501.14
NOX HASS GRAMS
31.971
FUEL KG (LB)
1.135 ( 2.50)
KW HR (HP HR)
1.93 ( 2.59)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.740 ( 8.009)
( 8.01)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-133 P90-134
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
15.214 (11.345)
(11.35)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
4.527 .310
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
16.554 (12.344)
(12.34)
(COST)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
3.638
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.8B4 ( 1.405)
( 1.40)
BSFC
KC/KH
HR
(LB/IP HR)
.588 ( .966)
WORK
KW
BR
(HP HR)
1.93 ( 2.59)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1813. ( 1352.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.7 C (60.2 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.014
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
a-c
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H5 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIHE
COHPOTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CAST 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 740.9 HH HG (29.17 IN HG) CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT Afl 81.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.9 C (58.9 F)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 23.9 C (75.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.9 G/KG ( 76.5 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.004
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER 1
TIME SECONDS 210.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCMM (SCFH) 32.41 (1144.4)
TOT. 90HM RATE SCHM (SCFH) .04 ( 1.48)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM (SCFH) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAHPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCP) 113.6 ( 4011.)
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .974
HC SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PPH 28.9/ 42/ 28.90
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH 7.7/ 42/ 7.71
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 20.9/ 13/ 18.76
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .5/ 13/ .44
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT 83.8/ 11/ .7949
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT 8.2/ 11/ .0490
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (») 7.4/ 43/107.56
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .3/3/ .78
DILUTION FACTOR 16.76
HC CONCENTRATION PPH 21.65
CO CONCENTRATION PPH 17.72
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT .7489
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH 106.83
HC MASS GRAHS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
1.413
2.343
1556.06
23.294
.492 ( 1.08)
2.36 ( 3.16)
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.600 (
.447)
( -45)
(COOT)
90 HH FILTER NOHBERS
P90-135 P90-136
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.994 (
.741)
( -74)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.313 .099
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.886 (
7.372)
( 7.37)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
1.872
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.795 (
.593)
( -59)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.209 (
.343)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
2.36 (
3.16)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
660. (
492.)
6"?
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUHBER
ENGINE HODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGIHE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H6 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COHPOTER PROGRAM BDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 741.2 HH HG (29.18 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 23.9 C (75.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90MH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. METRES(SCF) "
CELL: 76.0 F Rfl 59.0 PCT AH 81.7 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.4 G/KG ( 72.6 GR/LB)
1
600.0
32.43 (1145.0)
.05 ( 1.79)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
324.8 ( 11468.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.2 C (57.5 F)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .994
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .976
IC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
METER/RANGE /PR!
METER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
28.5/ 42/ 28.50
7.0/ 42/ 7.01
10.3/ 13/ 9.11
.2/ 13/ .17
69.6/ 11/ .6036
8.4/ 11/ .0502
1.9/ 43/ 77.13
.6/ 2/ .62
22.07
21.81
8.67
.5556
76.54
HC MASS GRAKS
CO MASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
BOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
4.069
3.279
3301.25
47.247
1.043 ( 2.30)
5.07 ( 6.80)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSSC G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.802 ( .598) (
.60)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-137 P90-138
BSCO G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.647 ( .482) (
.48)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
1.565 .167
BSBOX G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.318 ( 6.948) (
6.95)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
1.111
PART. G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.219 { .163) (
.16)
BSFC KG/KWHR
(LB/HP HR)
.206 ( .338)
WORK KW HR
(HP HR)
5.07 ( 6.80)
BSC02 G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
651. ( 485.)
6-8
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H7 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIKE
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
ECR 1.80
BAROMETER 741.2 HH HG (29.18 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 24.4 C (76.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH]
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAHPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 76.0 F RH 59.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.2 G/KG
1
AH 81.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW FT. 15.4 C (59.7 F)
( 78.7 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.010
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .977
1200.1
32.54 (1149.1)
.04 ( 1.46)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
651.8 ( 23014.)
30.6/ 42/ 30.61
6.4/ 42/ 6.41
14.3/ 13/ 12.72
.4/ 13/ .35
55.9/ 11/ .4459
8.2/ 11/ .0490
.6/ 43/ 49.38
.5/ 2/ .52
29.76
24.42
12.04
.3986
48.88
HC MASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX MASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (BP BR)
TOTAL RESULTS
9.142
9.135
4752.45
61.516
1.507 ( 3.32)
6.78 ( 9.09)
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.349 ( 1.006) |
[ 1.01)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-139 P90-140
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.348 ( 1.005) 1
[ 1.00)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.662 .263
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
9.075 ( 6.767) I
! 6.77)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.305
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.340 ( .254) I
! -25)
BSFC
KG/RW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.222 ( .366)
WORK
KU
HR
(HP HR)
6.78 ( 9.09)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
701. ( 523.)
G-9
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT TO. 03-4855-150
ENGINE KUKBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 1.5 1(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H8 RDH
DATE 5/26/92 TIHE
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D DH392-F
HCR l.SO
3AROHETER 740.9 HH BG (29.17 IH HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 26.1 C (79.01
3AG RESULTS
BAG NUHBER
THE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
CELL: "6.0 F RH 59.0 PCT U 81.7 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. EDM. 11.3 G/KG ( 79.0 GR/LB)
1
1200.0
32.56 (1149.51
.04 ( 1.46)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
651.9 ( 23020.)
ENGINE DEM PT. 15.4 C (59.8 F)
NOX HDKIDITY C.F. 1.011
DRlf-TO-tiET C.F. .980
HC SAMPLE HETER/RAHGE/PPH
25.8/ 42I 25.83
SC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.7/ 42/ 6.71
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
7.2/ 13/ 6.34
CO BCKGM HETES/RANGE/PPH
.3/ 13/ .26
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
47.9/ 13/ .1081
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
23.6/ 13/ .0505
NOX SAMPLE HETES/RANGE/PPH (tf)
.1/ 43/ 5.17
NOX BCKGRD HETES/RANGE/PPH
.9/ 1/ .24
DILUTION FACTOR
120.43
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
19.18
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
5.95
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.0580
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
4.93
HC MASS GRAMS
7.183
CO MASS GRAMS
4.520
C02 MASS GRAMS
692.00
NOX MASS GRAMS
6.214
FUEL KG (LBI
KW HR |HP HR)
.227 f .50)
( )
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HS
(G/HP HR)
******
1******1
(*****)
(COST)
90 KH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-141 P90-142
BSCO
G/KW
as
(G/HP HR)
******
1******1
(*****)
90 MH FILTER WT. GAINS (MG)
1.816 .257
BSNOX
G/KW
HS
(G/HP HR)
******
(******1
(*****)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
1.632
PART.
G/KW
HS
(G/HP HR)
******
BSFC
KG/KM
HS
(LB/HP HR)
WORK
KW
HS
(HP HR)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
G-io
-------
John Deere 4.5L Off Highway ISO 8178 8-
08-4855-150 TestOate= 5-26-92
C:\123R3\DATA\JD45SS2
Mode Test (#2) Data
ISO 8-Mode Test Points
John Deere 4.5L Off-Highway
Weighting
Speed
Torque
Mode
Speed
Load %
Factor
rpm
ft-Jb
BHP
1
Rated
100
15%
2,200
178
75
2
Rated
75
15%
2,200
134
56
3
Rated
50
15%
2,200
89
37
4
Rated
10
10%
2,200
18
7
5
Int
too
10%
1,300
220
54
6
Int
75
10%
1,300
165
41
7
Int
50
10%
1,300
110
27
8
Idle
0
15%
770
0
0
Mode g/hr Results
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hr
P/hr
g/hr
g/hr
g/hr
1
76
24.8
26.62
115.43
403.39
27.58
2
56
20.8
39.85
60.18
287.85
13.66
3
38
15.8
42.78
72.76
214.60
12.04
4
7
7.5
55.09
78.90
97.71
9.82
5
55
18.3
24.53
34.61
392.67
28.05
6
41
13.9
25.84
17.68
292.29
7.18
7
27
10.0
27.71
28.08
187.39
6.93
8
0
1.6
23.71
15.32
21.50
4.56
Mode g/lb Fuel
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
lb/lb
q/lb
g/ib
Q/lb
g/lb
1
76
NA
1.07
4.65
16.24
1.11
2
56
NA
1.92
2.90
13.87
0.66
3
38
NA
2.71
4.61
13.60
0.76
4
7
NA
7.38
10.56
13.08
1.31
5
55
NA
1.34
1.89
21.41
1.53
6
41
NA
1.86
1.28
21.09
0.52
7
27
NA
2.78
2.82
18.82
0.70
8
0
NA
14.91
9.64
13.52
2.87
Mode g/hp-hr
BSFC
HC
CO
NOx
Part
Mode
Hp
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
1
76
0.327
0.35
1.52
5.31
0.36
2
56
0.368
0.71
1.07
5.10
0.24
3
38
0.415
1.13
1.92
5.65
0.32
4
7
1.047
7.72
11.05
13.69
1.38
5
55
0.334
0.45
0.63
7.16
0.51
6
41
0.335
0.63
0.43
7.07
0.17
7
27
0.363
1.01
1.02
6.83
0.25
8
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
HC .
CO
NOx
Part
Ib/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
g/hp-hr
8-Mode
Weighted
0.373
0.86
1.44
6.11
0.359
-------
ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND AMBIENT CONDITIONS
RAW DATA SHEET FOR HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL
DEPARTMENT OF EMISSIONS RESEARCH
fairz-
Test No. —g2. . SwRI Project No. S5~*S5~0 Project Leader: / Tk
Test Operator:i'3PlfbCell No. Jd. Engine I.D. ^^Fuel c<^*F/n-/353-f
Engine Configuration:
Measurement
Mode
tt\
Mode
#2
Mode
tt 3
Mode
#4
Mode
its
Mode
m
Mode
#7
Mode
#8
Torque (ft-lb)
/ft 1
12 H
f /
42%
KC
til
O
Speed (ipm)
/.? -»«#
t 1 f/9
*)*)!?
Power (bhp)
76
fU
JO.?
O.Ci
fir
m
V?
O
Curb Idle (rpm)
-—
High Idle (rpm)
—¦
—
Water Out (°F)
i*n
/f?"
\1l
//>o
F.ihaust (°F)
jr$t
lent
WD
Intercooler In (°F)
>—
—
Intercooler Out (°F)
—
¦—
-—
—
—-
—
Inlet Air Dewpomt (°F)
(!¦ 1
4T^
n,2
Sl.t*
0
Chiller Water (°F)
r,7
T /
h f
So
S0
Barometer (in. Hg)
JW/.T
&.U
47J 0
If/f)
Inlet Air Restrict (in. H2O)
//.&
hi
lul
C.2
L!l
1.0
F.xhiiust Restriction (in. Hg)
?„?
1,9
1.1
,n
* £
, &>
Fuel Flow (lbm/hr)
m
U1
/5T
%9*
an
*3
if
Oil Pressure (psig)
(,o. 0
l/>.0
(,0.0
&0. ft
£fe>
5G. a
6(.o
Boost Pressure B-4 IC (psig)
—
•—
Boost Press. After IC (psig)
—
-—
*—
Engine Hours
1^9/)
/W.I
thot.L
Nee.*?
g !. v?
11 r J
Date
Gl~(2.
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H-1-2 RDM
DATE 5/26/92 TIHE
COHPUTER PROGRAM BUT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EM-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 740.4 HH HG (29.15 IN HG) CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCT AH 83.6 GR/LB
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 26.1 C (79.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.8 G/KG ( 82.9 GR/LB)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER 1
TIME SECONDS
600.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH)
32.38 (1143.4)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCXH (SCFH)
.04 ( 1.51)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
324.2 ( 11449.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
30.2/ 42/ 30.27
HC BCKGPD HETER/RANGE/PPH
7.0/ 42/ 7.01
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
56.1/ 13/ 53.07
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.1/ 13/ .09
C02 SAMPLE MET ER/RAHGE/PCT
60.0/ 3/1.0441
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
3.0/ 3/ .0471
NO! SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
2.6/ 43/106.68
KOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 3/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
12.73
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
23.82
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
50.97
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
1.0007
HOX CONCENTRATION PPH
106.20
HC HASS GRAMS
4.436
CO HASS GRAMS
19.239
C02 MASS GRAMS
5935.95
NO* HASS GRAMS
67.232
FUEL KG (LB)
1.879 ( 4.14)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.44 ( 12.66)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.470 (
: -350) {
•35)
(COHT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-143 P90-144
BSCO
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
2.038 |
: 1.520) 1
1.52)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
5.924 .141
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
7.122 |
: 5.3ii) (
5.31)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
4.596
PART.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
.487 |
! .363) (
.36)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.199 |
I -327)
WORK
Hi
HR
(HP HR)
9.44 |
i 12.66)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
629. |
: 469.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 16.2 C (61.1 F)
NOX HOHIDITY C.F. 1.021
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .971
G-b
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H-2-2 RUN
DATE 5/26/92 TIME 2:00
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 740.2 HH HG (29.14 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 25.6 C (78.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIHE SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAHPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOX SAHPLE
SOI BCKGRD
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PPH
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
CELL: 78.0 F RH 53.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.1 G/KG
1
600.0
32.40 (1144.0)
.05 ( 1.94)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
324.5 ( 11459.)
43.1/ 42/ 43.10
8.0/ 42/ 8.01
30.3/ 13/ 27.56
.1/ 13/ .09
89.6/ 11/ .8830
8.4/ 11/ .0502
1.9/ 43/ 77.40
.6/ 2/ .62
15.06
35.63
26.55
.8361
76.82
AH 78.4 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.1 C (59.2 F)
; 77.4 GR/LB) NOX HUHIDITY C.F. 1.006
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .974
HC HASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX HASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
6.642
10.030
4963.90
47.975
1.571 ( 3.46)
7.02 ( 9.41)
BSHC
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
.947 (
.706) 1
: -71)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-145 P90-146
BSCO
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
1.429 (
1.066) l
I 1-07)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.645 .205
BSSOX
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
6.837 (
5.098) 1
( 5.10)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
2.277
PART.
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
.325 (
.242) 1
I -24)
BSFC
KG/KW HR (LB/HP HR)
.224 (
.368)
wORK
KW HR (HP HR)
7.02 (
9.41)
BSC02
G/KW HR (G/HP HR)
707. (
528.)
G-14
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 LI275. CIDI 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
IMGIHE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
TEST JD-4.5-SH-3-2 SDN
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM SDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 739.9 MM HG (29.13 IN HG1 CELL: 73.0 F RH 57.0 PCT AH 83.7 GR/LB
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 24.4 C (76.0) ENGINE ABS. HUM. 10.5 G/KG ( 73.3 GR/LB)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
1
TIHE SECONDS
1200.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
32.38 (1143.4)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.04 { 1.13)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
.00 ( .0)
TOT. AOX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCTH)
.00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
648.4 ( 22896.)
BC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
44.6/ 42/ 44.64
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.7/ 42/ 6.71
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
36.5/ 13/ 33.50
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.4/ 13/ .35
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
75.7/ 11/ .6819
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
8.7/ 11/ .0521
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.7/ 43/ 58.53
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.6/ 2/ .62
DILUTION FACTOR
19.43
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
38.28
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
32.13
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.6325
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
57.94
BC MASS GRAMS
14.260
CO MASS GRAHS
24.254
CO2 MASS GRAMS
7502.49
NOX MASS GRAHS
71.532
FUEL KG (LB)
2.384 ( 5.26)
KW HR (HP HR)
9.43 { 12.65)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KW HS
(G/HP HR)
1.512 ( 1.127)
( 1.13)
(CONT)
90 HM FILTER NUMBERS
P90-147 P90-148
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
2.571 f 1.917)
( 1-92)
90 MM FILTER «T. GAINS (HG)
4.793 .227
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
7.583 ( 5.655)
( 5.65)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
4.013
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.425 ( .317)
( -32)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.253 ( .415)
«QRK
KW HR
(HP HR)
9.43 ( 12.65)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
795. ( 593.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.3 C (57.7 F)
NOX HUHIDITY C.F. .996
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .975
G-l>
-------
ENGINE EHISSION RESULTS
s.s.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H-4-2 RUN
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM BUT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CAST 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 739.9 HH HG (29.13 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 24.4 C (76.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 90HM RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. AOL SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUH. 11.4 G/KG
1
1200.1
32.42 (1144.6)
.04 ( 1.47)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
649.2 ( 22923.)
AH 83.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 15.5 C (60.0 F)
79.7 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.012
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .978
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 55
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH 6
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 39
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RABGE/PCT 45
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT 8
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (K)
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
9/ 42/ 55.97
9/ 42/ 6.91
1/ 13/ 36.03
4/ 13/ .35
7/ 11/ .3428
3/ 11/ .0496
3/ 43/ 26.42
5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
BC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
38.07
49.24
34.80
.2945
25.91
3C HASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAMS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX MASS GRAHS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
18.365
26.301
3498.17
32.573
1.131 ( 2.49)
1.77 ( 2.38)
BSHC
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
10.348 ( 7.716)
{ 7.72)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-149 P90-150
BSCO
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
14.819 (11.051)
(11.05)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
3.580 .627
BSNOX
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
18.353 (13.686)
(13.69)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
3.273
PAST.
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.844 ( 1.375)
( 1-38)
BSFC
KG/KW
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.637 ( 1.047)
WORK
KW
HR
(HP HR)
1.77 ( 2.38)
BSC02
G/KW
HR
(G/HP HR)
1971. ( 1470.)
-------
ENGINE WJKBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
s.s.
TEST JD-4.5-8H-5-2 RUN
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAH HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.80
BAROMETER 739.6 HH EG (29.12 IN EGI CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCI AH 83.7 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PI. 14.7 C (58.5 F)
ENGINE AIR TEHP. 27.8 C (82.0) ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.8 G/KG f 75.5 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.001
BAG RESULTS
BAG NOHBER 1
TIME SECONDS 210.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SOW (SCFH) 32.35 (1142.3)
TOT. 90HH RATE SOW (SCFH) .04 ( 1.44)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SOW (SCFH) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCMH (SCFH) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. 03. METRES!SCF) " 113.4 ( 4003.)
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .974
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 28.3/ 42/ 28.28
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH 6.7/ 42/ 6.71
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH 17.8/ 13/ 15.91
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .1/ 13/ .09
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT 83.3/ 11/ .7876
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT 8.5/ 11/ .0509
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RAHGE/PPH (W) 7.3/ 43/105.76
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH .1/ 3/ .26
DILUTION FACTOR 16.92
HC CONCENTRATION PPH 21.97
CO CONCENTRATION PPH 15.30
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT .7398
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH 105.52
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAMS
FUEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
1.431
2.019
1534.24
22.906
.485 ( 1.07)
2.39 ( 3.20)
BSHC
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.600 (
•447) (
.45)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-151 P90-152
BSCO
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.846 (
' -631) (
• 63)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (KG)
1.966 .091
BSNOX
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
9.599 (
7.158) (
7.16)
(CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAHS/TEST
1.636
PART.
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
.686 |
: -511) (
.51)
BSFC
KG/KW HR
(LB/HP HR)
.203 (
.334)
WORK
KW HR
(HP HR)
2.39 (
3.20)
BSC02
G/KW HR
(G/HP HR)
643. (
; 479.)
Q-/T-
-------
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
PROJECT NO. 08-4855-150
ENGINE NTJHBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 LI275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CTCLE DIESEL
TEST JD-4.5-8H-6-2 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIHE
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
ECR 1.80
BAROMETER 739.4 MM HG (29.11 IN HG) CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCT AH 83.8 GR/LB ENGINE DEW PT. 14.1 C (57.3 F)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 27.8 C (82.01 ENGINE ABS. HUH. 10.3 G/KG ( 72.3 GR/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .993
DRK-TO-fflT C.F. .975
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER 1
TIME SECONDS 600.0
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHM (SCFH) 32.42 (1144.6)
TOT. 90HH RATE SCHH (SCFH1 .04 ( 1.49)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFM) .00 ( .0)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCUM (SCFM) .00 ( .00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRES!SCF) 324.6 ( 11461.)
EC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
28.7/ 42/ 28.74
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
5.9/ 42/ 5.91
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
9.1/ 13/ 8.04
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.0/ 13/ .00
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
69.8/ 11/ .6060
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
8.5/ 11/ .0509
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (U)
1.9/ 43/ 79.53
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
21.98
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
23.10
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
7.80
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.5575
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
79.03
3C MASS GRAMS 4.307
CO HASS GRAMS 2.947
002 HASS GRAMS 3310.39
NOX HASS GRAMS 48.715
FUEL KG (LB) 1.046 ( 2.31)
KW HR (HP HR) 5.14 ( 6.89)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KH E
R (G/HP HR)
.838 (
.625) (
.63) (CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-153 P90-154
BSCO
G/HJ E
R (G/HP HR)
.574 (
.428) (
.43)
90 MM FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
1.423 .129
BSNOX
G/KW E
R (G/HP HR)
9.481 (
7.070) (
7.07) (CONT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
1.197
PART.
G/KW E
R (G/HP HR)
.233 (
•174) (
.17)
BSFC
KG/KW I
R (LB/HP HR)
.204 (
.335)
WORK
KW E
R (HP HR)
5.14 (
6.89)
BSC02
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
644. (
480.)
G-IS
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
EMGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE 4.5 L(275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
TEST JD-4.5-8H-7-2 RON
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT 1.0-C
CELL 4 BAG CART 1
PROJECT HO. 08-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-F
HCR 1.30
BAROMETER 739.1 KM HG (29.10 IN HG)
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 28.3 C (83.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCUM (SCFH)
TOT. 90MM RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHH (SCFH)
TOT. ADX. SAMPLE RATE SCHH (SCFH)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCT
ENGINE ABS. HUM. 10.4 G/KG
1
1200.1
32.40 (1144.1)
AH 83.8 GR/LB
72.6 GR/LB)
.04 (
.00 (
.00 (
1.44)
•0)
.00)
TOTAL FLOW STD. CO. HETRES(SCF)
648.9 ( 22912.)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
30.5/ 42/ 30.58
8C BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
6.0/ 42/ 6.01
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
14.5/ 13/ 12.90
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.2/ 13/ .17
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
56.0/ 11/ .4470
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
8.1/ 11/ .0483
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH (W)
.6/ 43/ 51.16
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
.5/ 2/ .52
DILUTION FACTOR
29.69
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
24.78
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
12.39
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
.4003
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
50.66
HC MASS GRAMS
9.237
CO MASS GRAMS
9.361
C02 MASS GRAMS
4751.41
NOX HASS GRAMS
62.470
FUEL KG (LB)
1.507 ( 3.32)
KH HR (HP HR)
6.82 ( 9.15)
ENGINE DEW PT. 14.1 C (57.
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .994
DRY-TO-WET C.F. .977
4 F)
TOTAL RESULTS
BSHC
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.354 ( 1.010)
( 1.01)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-155 P90-156
BSCO
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
1.372 ( 1.023)
( 1.02)
90 HH FILTER WT. GAINS (HG)
2.640 .260
BSNOX
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
9.156 ( 6.827)
( 6.83)
(COMT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
2.309
PART.
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
.338 ( .252)
( -25)
BSFC
KG/KH
HR
(LB/HP HR)
.221 ( .363)
WORK
KB
HR
(HP HR)
6.82 ( 9.15)
BSC02
G/KH
HR
(G/HP HR)
696. ( 519.)
6r/
-------
ENGINE NUMBER
ENGINE MODEL 91 JD-4045D
ENGINE i.5 LI 275. CID) 1-4
ENGINE CYCLE DIESEL
ENGINE EMISSION RESULTS
S.S.
TEST JD-4.5-8H-8-2 RUN
DATE 5/26/92 TIME
COMPUTER PROGRAM HDT l.O-C
CELL 4 BAG CAST 1
PROJECT NO. 03-4855-150
DIESEL 2D EH-1392-P
ECS 1.30
BAROMETER 738.9 HI HG (29.09 IN HG1
ENGINE AIR TEMP. 28.9 C (84.0)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
TIME SECONDS
TOT. BLOWER RATE SCHM ISCFH)
TOT. 90HM RATE SOW (SCFH1
TOT. 20X20 RATE SCHM ISCFH)
TOT. AUX. SAMPLE RATE SCHM (SCTM1
TOTAL FLOW STD. CD. METRESISCP)
CELL: 78.0 F RH 57.0 PCT AH 83.8 GR/LB
ENGINE ABS. HUM. 11.3 G/'KG ( 79.2 GR/LB)
1
1200.1
32.38 (1143.5)
.04 ( 1.44)
.00 ( .0)
.00 ( .00)
648.5 ( 22900.)
ENGINE DEW PT. 15.4 C (59.8 F)
HOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.011
DRY-TO-tiET C.F. .980
HC SAMPLE
EC BCKGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRD
C02 SAMPLE
C02 BCKGRD
NOI SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HETES/RANGE/PPM
HETER/RANGE/PPM
HETES/RANGE/PPM
METES/RANGE/PPM
METES/RANGE/PCT
HETER/RANGE/PCT
HETES/RANGE/PPM (W)
METER/RANGE/PPH
DILDTIOH FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
26.1/ 42/ 25.18
5.0/ 42/ 5.01
9.0/ 13/ 7.95
1.2/ 13/ 1.05
49.8/ 13/ .1128
24.1/ 13/ .0516
.1/ 43/ 5.98
1.0/ 1/ .27
115.31
21.21
6.77
.0617
5.72
HC HASS GRAMS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX MASS GRAHS
FOEL KG (LB)
KW HR (HP HR)
TOTAL RESULTS
7.904
5.108
731.70
7.168
.240 ( .53)
< )
BSEC
G/KW K
R (G/HP HR)
(CONT)
90 HH FILTER NUMBERS
P90-157 P90-158
BSCO
G/KW S
R (G/HP HR)
90 HN FILTER WT. GAINS (MG)
1.805 .111
BSNOX
G/KU S
R (G/HP HR)
(COHT)
PARTICULATE GRAMS/TEST
1.519
PART'.
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
BSFC
KG/KW H
R (LB/HP HR)
WORK
KW H
R (HP HR)
BSC02
G/KW H
R (G/HP HR)
G-20
------- |