United States Office of Publication 9320.7-041
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and May 1993
Agency Emergency Response
<&ERA Background Information:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Intermittent Bulletin
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (OSi-5204G) Volume 3 Number 1
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing 26 sites to the Natural Priorities List
(NPL) in a rule published in the Federal Register in
May 1993. Of die 26 sites in Proposed Rule #14, 19
are in the General Superfund Section and 7 in the
Federal Facilities Section. The sites am in 17 States.
Virginia is proposing three sites; a number erf States are
proposing two sites.
The status of the NPL (reflecting six site actions
described later) is as follows:
General Federal Total
Proposed
44
10
Proposed Rule #14
(19)
<7)
Previously Proposed
(25)
(3)
Final
1,079
123
Proposed Plus Final 1,256
EPA is not the lead agency at Federal facility sites,
and its role at such alas is accoidiagly lass nteuive
than at sites in the Gcneni Superfund Section. Under
Executive Order 12530 and CERCLA Section 120, each
Federal agency is responsible fcr carrying out most
response actions at facilities under its own jurisdiction,
custody, or control, although EPA is responsible for
scoring Federal facility sites.
The NPL uncontrolled hazardous waste
sites that warrant further investigation to rtrtuininn if
long-term "remedial action" is necessary. The sites in
the General Superfund Section of the NPL an eligible
for remeZISr action funded under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA), enacted on December 11, 1980, as
amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA), enacted on October 17,
1986. SARA authorized a "Hazardous Substances
Superfund* totalling $8.5 billion over S years to pay
coats for overseeing work by those responsible for
cleaning up waste sites, and to pay costs not —"mart by
responsible parties for cleanup at files in the General
Superfund Section of the NPL. In October 1990, SARA
was extended to September 30, 1994 to provide an
additional $5.1 billion.
EPA's goals for the Superfund program are to:
e Address the worst sites and the wont problems
first
e Make sitae safe by immediately controlling acute
threats to people and the environment
e Develop and use new technologies for more
effective cleanups
EPA continually seeks ways to evaluate nd clean up
¦tas more quickly. The new "Superfund Accelerated
Clean? Model* (SACM) involves several pilot projects
aimed at streamlining the Superfund process. EPA will
describe ay changes to the process resulting from
SACM as they are identified,
This dociimm provides information on
the nils and two lists:
-------
• The names and locations of the 26 new Proposed
Rule #14 sites
• The 1,256 final and proposed NPL sites by state
CONTENTS OF RULE
Two sites in this rule are subject to Subtitle C of die
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
EPA'spolicy is, ingeneral, noUftjdacesites subject to
RCRA Subtitle C on the
NFL because die owners omwMM legaly to take
such action under ^SA, Jfawever,
-------
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION UST
EPA has developed the Construction Completion List
(CCL) (58 FR12142, Match 2,1993) to better show the
successful completion of Superfimd response action at
present or former NPL sites. The CCL is intended to
enhance public understanding of the status of cleanup
progress at sites.
The CCL now totals 161 sites, all but 1 from the
General Superfimd Section.
Cleanups at sites on the NPL do not reflect the total
picture of Superfimd accomplishments. As of March
1993, EPA had conducted 2.884 removal actions, 822 of
them at NPL sites. Information on removals is available
from the Superfimd Hotline.
ADDITIONAL PUBLICATIONS
Single copies of two additional publications relative
to this rule are available from EPA's Public Infbnnatica
Center (PIC), PM-211B, 401 M Street SW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone (202) 260-2080:
• Supplementary Materials: National Priorities
List, Proposed Rule. Publication 9320.7-051,
Volume 3, Number 1, May 1993.
• Descriptions of 26 Sites Proposed for the National
Priorities List in May 1993. Publication 9320.7-
071, Volume 3, Number 1.
3
-------
national Priorities List
General Superfund Section, Proposed Rule #14 (by State]
May 1993
St Site Name
Location
Notes
AL Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
CO ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
CO Suimitvtlle Mine
Fl Plymouth Avenue Landfill
HI Del Monte Corp. (Oshu Plantation)
ID Blackbird Mine
ID Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
MO Ordnance Products, Inc.
HS Potter Co.
Nj Horseshoe Road
NY Onondaga Lake
NY Pfohl Brothers Landfill
OH Diamond Shamrock Corp.tPainesville Work)
OH Dover Chemical Corp.
OK National Zinc Corp.
Oft East Multnomah County Ground Utr Cootam.
TN ICG Iseiin Railroad Yard
TX RSR Corp.
UA Pacific Sound Resources
Nuitoer of Sites Being Proposed to the General
Florence
Denver
Rio Grand* County
Deiand
Honolulu County
Lemhi County
Triunph
Cecil County
Wesson
Sayreville
Syracuse
Cheektowaga
Painesville
Dover
Bartlesvi Us
Multnomah County
Jackson
Dallas
Seattle
Superfund Section: 19
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S > state top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Proposed Rule #14 (by State)
May 1993
St SiteNme Location Notes3
ICY
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
Paducah
MA
Hanscont Air Fore* Base
Bedford
MA
Hatick Laboratory Army Research,D4E Cntr
Natick
MO
Seltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
Beltsville
VA
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Hampton
VA
Marina Corp* Conbat Development Command
Quantico
WA
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
Bremerton
Number of Sites Being Proposed to the Federal Facilities Section: 7
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
5
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Nam Location Proposed8 Final Motes
AK
General Superfund Sites
Al
AR
AZ
CA
Alaska Battery Enterprises
Fairbanks N Star
Bor
06/88
03/89
Arctic Surplus
Fai rbanks
10/89
08/90
Federal Facility Sites
Adak Naval Air Station
Adak
10/92
Eielson Air Force Base
Fairbanks N Star
Bor
07/89
11/89
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Greater Anchorage Bo
07/89
08/90
Fort Wainwright
Fairbanks N Star
Bor
07/89
08/90
Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USDOT
Anchorage
07/89
08/90
2 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites * 7
General Si^wrfind Sites
Ciba-Geigy Corp. (Mcintosh Plant)
Mcintosh
09/83
09/84
Interstate Lead Co. (ILCO)
Leeds
09/85
06/86
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
Florence
05/93
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Greenvilie
12/82
09/83
01 in Corp. (Mcintosh Plant)
Mcintosh
09/83
09/84
Perdido Ground Uater Contamination
Perdido
12/82
09/83
Redwing Carriers, Inc. (Saralarid)
Sara I and
06/88
02/90
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Cold Creek Plant)
Bucks
09/83
09/84
Stauffer CheatcaI Co. (LeMoyne Plant)
Axis
09/83
09/84
T.H. Agriculture t nutrition (Montgomery
Montgomery
06/88
08/90
Triana/Tennessee River
L imestone/Morgan
10/81
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
ChiIdersburg
10/84
07/87
Amtston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
Amiston
10/84
03/89
11 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 13
General Superfund Sites
Arkwood, Inc.
Omaha
09/85
03/89
Frit Industries
Walnut Ridge
10/81
09/83
Gurley Pit
Edaondson
12/82
09/83
Industrial Waste Control
Fort Smith
12/82
09/83
Jacksonvilie Municipal Landfill
Jacksonville
01/87
07/87
Mid-South Uood products
Mane
10/81
09/83
Midland Products
Ola/Birta
10/84
06/86
Monroe Auto Equipment (Paragould Pit)
Paragould
10/89
08/90
Popile, Inc.
El Dorado
02/92
10/92
Rogers Road Municipel Landfill
Jacksonville
01/87
07/87
South 8th Street Landfill (U Memphis LF)
West Memphis
02/92
10/92
Vertac, Inc.
Jacksonville
10/81
09/83
12 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 12
Generel Sifter fund Sites
Apache Powder Co.
St. David
06/86
08/90
HsssayaMpe Landfill
Hassayampe
06/86
07/87
Indian Bend Wash Area
Scottsdale/Tape/Phnx
12/82
09/83
Litchfield Airport Area
Goodyeer/Avondale
12/82
09/83
Motorola, Inc.(52nd Street Plant)
Phoenix
10/84
10/89
Nineteenth Avenue Landfill
Phoenix
10/81
09/83
Tucson International Airport Area
Tucson
07/82
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Luke Air Force Base
Glendale
07/89
08/90
UiIliams Air Force Base
Chandler
07/89
11/89
Yum Marine Corps Air Station
Yuaa
06/88
02/90
7 General Superfund Sites ~ 3 Federal Facility Sites * 10
General Superfund Sites
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Sunnyvale
10/84
06/86
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (Bldg. 915)
Sunnyvale
06/88
08/90
Aerojet General Corp.
Rancho Cordova
10/81
09/83
6
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
St
Site Nam
Location
Proposed'
Date
a
Final
Notes
Applied Materials
Santa Clara
10/84
07/87
Atlas Asbestos Nine
Fresno County
09/83
09/84
Beckman Instrunents (Porterville Plant)
Porterville
10/84
06/86
Brown ft Bryant, Inc.(Arvin Plant)
Arvin
06/88
10/89
CTS Printex, Inc.
Mountain View
06/88
02/90
Celtor Chemical Works
Hoopa
12/82
09/83
Coalinga Asbestos Mine
Coalinga
09/83
09/84
Coast Wood Preserving
Ukiah
12/82
09/83
Cooper Drun Co.
South Gate
02/92
Crazy Horse Sanitary Landfill
Salinas
06/88
08/90
Del Aino Facility
Los Angeles
07/91
Del Norte Pesticide Storage
Crescent City
09/83
09/84
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp (Mt View)
Mountain View
10/84
02/91
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp (S San Jose
South San Jose
10/84
10/89
Firestone TireiRubber Co.(Salinas Plant)
Salinas
10/84
07/87
Fresno Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Fresno
06/88
10/89
GBF, Inc., Dump
Ant i och
02/92
Hewlett-Packard (620-640 Page Mill Road)
Palo Alto
06/88
02/90
Hexcel Corp.
Livertnore
06/88
08/90
Industrial Waste Processing
Fresno
10/89
08/90
Intel Corp. (Mountain View Plant)
Mountain View
10/84
06/86
Intel Corp. (Santa Clara III)
Santa Clara
10/84
06/86
Intel Magnetics
Santa Clara
10/84
06/86
Intersil Inc./Siemens Components
Cupertino
06/88
08/90
Iron Mountain Mine
Redding
10/81
09/83
J.H. Baxter & Co.
Weed
10/84
10/89
Jasco Chemical Corp.
Mountain View
06/88
10/89
Koppers Co., Inc. (Oroville Plant)
Oroville
09/83
09/84
Liquid Gold Oil Corp.
Richmond
12/82
09/83
Lorentz Barrel t Drum Co.
San Jose
10/84
10/89
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.
Oroville
10/84
06/86
MGM Brakes
CIover dale
12/82
09/83
McColl
Fullerton
12/82
09/83
McCormick I Baxter Creosoting Co.
Stockton
02/92
10/92
Modesto Ground Water Contamination
Modesto
06/88
03/89
Monolithic Memories
Sunnyvale
10/84
07/87
Montrose Chemical Corp.
Torrance
10/84
10/89
National Semiconductor Corp.
Santa Clara
10/84
07/87
Newmark Ground Water Contamination
San Bernardino
06/88
03/89
Operating Industries, Inc., Landfill
Monterey Park
10/84
06/86
Pacific Coast Pipe Lines
F111more
06/88
10/89
Purity Oil Sales, Inc.
Malaga
12/82
09/83
Ralph Gray Trucking Co.
Westminster
07/91
10/92
Raytheon Corp.
Mountain View
10/84
06/86
San Fernando Valley (Area 1)
Los Angeles
10/84
06/86
San Fernando Valley (Area 2)
Los Angeles/Glendale
10/84
06/86
San Fernando Valley (Area 3)
Glendale
10/84
06/86
San Fernando Valley (Area 4)
Los Angeles
10/84
06/86
San Gabriel Valley (Area 1)
El Monte
09/83
05/84
San Gabriel Valley (Area 2)
Baldwin Park Area
09/83
OS/84
San Gabriel Valley (Area 3)
Alhaabra
09/83
05/84
San Gabriel Valley (Area 4)
La Puente
09/83
05/84
Selma Treating Co.
Selma
12/82
09/83
Sola Optical USA, Inc.
Petal uaa
06/88
02/90
South Bay Asbestos Area
Alviso
10/84
06/86
Southern California Edison Co. (Visalia)
visalia
01/87
03/89
Spectra-Physics, Inc.
Mountain View
06/88
02/91
Stoker Company
Imperial
07/91
09/83
Stringfetlow
Glen Avon Heights
10/81
Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine
Clear lake
06/88
08/90
Synertek, Inc. (Building 1)
Santa Clara
06/88
10/89
7
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Nam Location Proposed" Final Notes'5
T.H. Agriculture A Nutrition Co.
TRW Microwave, Ine (Building 825)
Teledyne Semiconductor
United Heckathorn Co.
Valley Wood Preserving, Inc.
Waste Disposal, Inc.
Watkina-Johnson Co. (Stewart Division)
Western Pacific Railroad Co.
Westinghouse Elecetric Corp. (Sunnyvale)
Federal Facility Sites
Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
Castle Air Force Base
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Edwards Air Force Base
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
Fort Ord
George Air Force Base
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (Site 300)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
March Air Force Base
Mather Air Force Base
McClellan Air Force Base (GW Contain)
Moffett Naval Air Station
Norton Air Force Base
Riverbenk Army Amsurition Plant
Sacramento Amy Depot
Sharp* Army Depot
Tracy Defense Depot
Travis Air Force Base
Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
73 General Superfund sites * 22 Federal Facility Sites
CO General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
Broderick Wood Products
California Gulch
Central City-Clear Creek
Chemical Sales Co.
Denver Radium Site
Eagle Mine
Lincoln Park
Lowry Landfill
Marshall Landfill
Sand Creek Industrial
Smeltertown Site
Smuggler Mountain
Simitvflle Nina
Uravan Uranium Project (Union Carbide)
Woodbury Chenical Co.
Federal Facility Sites
Air Force Plant PJKS
Rocky Flats Plant (USOOE)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
16 General Superfund Sites * 3 Federal Facility Sites
CT General Superfund Sites
Barkhamsted-Neu Hartford Landfill
Beacon Heights Landfill
Cheshire Ground Water Contamination
Fresno
10/84
06/86
Sunnyvale
06/88
02/90
Mountain View
10/84
07/87
Richmond
10/89
03/90
Turlock
06/88
03/89
Santa Fe Springs
06/86
07/87
Scotts Valley
01/87
08/90
Orovilie
10/89
08/90
Sunnyvale
10/84
06/86
Barstow
07/89
11/89
San Diego County
07/89
11/89
Merced
10/84
07/87
Concord
02/92
Kern County
07/89
08/90
El Toro
06/88
02/90
Marina
07/89
02/90
Victorvilie
07/89
02/90
Pasadena
02/92
10/92
Livermore
07/89
08/90
Livermore
10/84
07/87
Riverside
07/89
11/89
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
Sunnyvale
04/85
07/87
San Bernardino
10/84
07/87
Riverbank
06/88
02/90
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
Lathrop
10/84
07/87
Tracy
07/89
08/90
Solano County
07/89
11/89
San Francisco
07/89
11/89
- 95
Denver
05/93
Denver
09/83
09/84
Leedville
12/82
09/83
Idaho Springs
07/82
09/83
Denver
06/88
08/90
Denver
10/81
09/83
Minturn/Redcliff
10/84
06/86
Canon City
09/83
09/84
Arapahoe County
09/83
09/84
Boulder County
07/82
09/83
S
Commerce City
12/82
09/83
Salida
02/92.
Pitkin County
10/84
06/86
Rio Grande County
05/93
Uravan
10/84
06/86
Commerce city
07/82
09/83
Waterton
07/89
11/89
F
Golden
10/84
10/89
F
Adams County
10/84
07/87
F
Barkhameted
06/88
10/89
Beacon Falls
12/82
09/83
Cheshire
06/88
08/90
8
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites {by State)
Hay 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed* Final Notes'1
Durham Meadow*
Gallup's Quarry
Kellogj-Deeririg UeU Field
Laurel Park, Inc.
Linemaster Switch corp.
Nutmeg Valley Road
Old Southington Landfill
Precision Plating Corp.
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
Solvents Recovery Service Mew England
Vaworski Waste Lagoon
Federal Facility Sites
New London Submarine Base
K General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility S
DE General Superfund Sites
Army Creek LandfiII
Chem-Solv, inc.
Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills
Delaware City PVC Plant
Delaware Sand C Gravel Landfill
Dover Gas Light Co.
E.l.Du Pont de Nemours (Newport Landfill
Kalby Chemical Co.
Harvey I Knott Drun, Inc.
Koppers Co., Inc. (Newport Plant}
NCR Corp. (Millsboro Plant)
New Castle Spi11
Sea Iand Limited
Standard Chlorine of Delaware,Ine
Sussex County Landf i11 No. 5
Tybouts Corner Landfill
Tyler Refrigeration Pit
Wildcat Landfill
Federal Facility Sites
Dover Air Force Base
18 General Superfund Sites * 1 Federal Facility Si
FL General Superfund Sites
Agrico Chemical Co.
Airco Plating Co.
Alpha Chemical Corp.
American Creosote Works (Pensacola Pit)
Anaconda Alminus Co./Milgo Electronics
Anodyne, Inc.
BIB Chemical Co., Inc.
SMI*Textron
Beulah Landfill
Broward Cov*ity--21«t Manor Dunp
Brown Wood Preserving
Cabot/Koppars
Chemform, Inc.
City Industries, Inc.
Coleman-Evans Wood Preserving Co.
Davie Landfill
Dubose Oil Products Co.
Florid* Steel Corp.
Gold Coast Oil Corp.
Harris Corp. (Palm Bay Plant)
Helena Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
Hipps Road Landfill
Durham
06/88
10/89
Plainffetd
06/88
10/89
Norwalk
09/83
09/84
Naugatuck Borough
10/81
09/83
Woodstock
06/88
02/9O
woleott
01/87
03/89
Southingten
09/83
09/84
Vernon
06/88
10/89
Sterling
96/86
07/87
Southington
12/82
09/83
Canterbury
12/82
09/83
New London
10/89
08/90
* 15
New Csstle County
10/81
09/83
Cheswold
01/87
08/90
Kent County
04/85
07/87
Delaware City
10/81
09/83
New Caatle County
10/81
09/83
Dover
01/87
10/89
Newport
01/87
02/90
New Castle
09/85
06/86
Kirkwood
07/82
09/83
Newport
10/89
08/90
Millsboro
04/85
07/87
New Castle County
12/82
09/83
Moirit Plaaaant
06/88
08/90
Delaware City
09/85
07/87
Laurel
06/88
10/89
New Castle County
10/81
09/83
Smyrna
06/86
02/90
Dover
12/82
09/83
Dover
10/84
03/89
* 19
Pensacola
06/88
10/89
Mi Mi
06/88
02/90
Galloway
10/81
09/83
Pensacola
10/81
09/83
Miami
10/89
08/90
North Miami Beach
06/88
02/90
Hieleeh
06/88
08/90
Lake Park
06/88
08/90
Pensacola
06/88
02/90
Fort Lauderdale
07/91
Live Oak
12/82
09/83
Gainesville
09/83
09/84
Pospano Beach
06/88
10/89
Orlando
10/84
10/89
UhitaliouH
10/81
09/83
Davie
10/81
09/83
Cantomwit
10/84
06/86
Indiantown
12/82
09/83
Miami
10/81
09/83
Palm Bay
04/85
07/87
Tampa
02/92
10/92
Ouvat County
09/83
09/84
9
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Site Name
Location
Date
Proposed*
Final
Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal
Fort Lauderdale
10/81
09/83
Kassauf-lC inter ling Battery Disposal
Tampa
10/81
09/83
Madison County Sanitary Landfill
Madison
06/88
08/90
Miami Drum Services
Miami
10/81
09/83
Muni sport Landfill
North Miami
12/82
09/83
Northwest 58th Street Landfill
Hialeah
10/81
09/83
Peak Oil Co./Bay Drum Co.
Tampa
10/84
06/86
Pepper Steel & Alloys, Inc.
Medley
09/83
09/84
Petroleu* Products Corp.
Pembroke Park
04/85
07/87
Pickettville Road Landfill
JacksonviIle
10/81
09/83
Piper Aireraft/Vero Beach Water fc Sewer
Vero Beach
06/86
02/90
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
DeLand
05/93
Reeves Southeast Galvanizing Corp
Tampa
10/81
09/83
Sapp Battery Salvage
Cottondale
10/81
09/83
Schuylkill Metals Corp.
Plant City
12/82
09/83
Sherwood Medical Industries
Deland
12/82
09/83
Sixty-Second Street Dump
Tampa
12/82
09/83
Standard Auto Simper Corp.
Hialeah
06/88
10/89
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
Tampa
02/92
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpons Springs)
Tarpon Springs
02/92
Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds
Brandon
06/86
10/89
Taylor Road Landfill
Seffner
10/81
09/83
Tower Chemical Co.
Clermont
10/81
09/83
Whitehouse Oil Pits
Whitehouse
10/81
09/83
Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc.
Pompano Beach
06/88
03/89
Wingate Road Municipal Incinerator Diwp
Fort Lauderdale
06/88
10/89
Woodbury Chemical Co. (Princeton Plant)
Princeton
06/88
08/90
Yellow Water Road Ounp
Baldwin
09/85
06/86
Ze11wood Ground Water Contamination
Ze11wood
10/81
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Jacksonvilie
07/89
11/89
Homestead Air Force Base
Homestead
07/89
08/90
Jacksonville HaveI Air Station
JacksonviIle
07/89
11/89
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Pensacola
07/89
11/89
51 General Superfund Sites ~ 4 Federal Facility Sites » 55
General Superfund Sites
Cedartown Industries, Inc.
Cedartown
06/88
02/90
Cedartown Municipal Landfill
Cedartown
06/88
03/89
Diamond Shamrock Corp. Landfill
Cedartown
01/87
08/90
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co(Albany Plant)
Albany
06/88
10/89
Hercules 009 Landfill
Brunswick
09/83
09/84
Marzone Inc./Chevron Chemical Co.
Tifton
06/88
10/89
Mathis Brothers landfill (S Marble Top)
Kensington
01/87
03/89
Monsanto Corp. (Augusta Plant)
Augusta
09/83
09/84
Powersville Sit*
Peach County
09/83
09/84
T.H. Agriculture I Nutrition (Albany)
Albany
06/88
03/89
Wool folk Chemical Works, Inc.
Fort Valley
06/88
08/90
Federal Facility'Sites
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Albany
07/89
11/89
Robins Air Fore* B«s*(Lfit/Sludge lagoon
Houeton Cocnty
10/84
07/87
11 General Superfwtd Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites » 13
General Superfind Sites
Ordot Landfill
Guam
10/81
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Andersen Air Force Base
Yigo
02/92
10/92
1 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites » 2
General Superfund Sites
05/93
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
Honolulu County
10
-------
National Priorities list
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
St
Site Name
Location
Date
Proposed"
Final
Notes
IA
ID
II
Federal Facility Sites
Pearl Harbor Maval Complex
Schofield Barracks
1 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites * 3
General Superfund Sites
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
19 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites * 20
General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Bunker Hill Mining I Metallurgical
Eastern Michaud Flats Contamination
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.(Soda Springs)
Monsanto Chemical Co. (Soda Springs)
Pacific Hide I Fur Recycling Co.
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Federal Facility Sites
Idaho National Engineering Lab (US00E)
Mountain Home Air Force Base
8 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federat Facility Sites
Lemhi County
SneltervUle
Pocatello
Soda Springs
Soda Springs
Pocatello
Triumph
Pocatello
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
10
General Superfund Sites
07/91
07/89
05/93
12/82
05/89
05/89
05/89
09/83
05/93
09/83
07/89
07/89
10/92
08/90
Aidex Corp.
Council Bluffs
10/81
09/83
Oes Moines TCE
Des Moines
12/82
09/83
E.I. Ou Pont de Nemours (County Rd X23)
West Point
06/88
08/90
Electro-Coatings, Inc.
Cedar Rapids
06/88
10/89
Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant
Fairfield
06/88
08/90
Farmers' Mutual Cooperative
Hospers
06/88
08/90
John Deere (Ottunua Works Landfills)
Ottunua
06/88
02/90
LaBounty Site
Charles City
12/82
09/83
Lawrence Todtz Farm
Camanche
09/85
06/86
Mid-America Tanning Co.
Sergeant Bluff
06/88
03/89
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm
Kellogg
09/85
06/86
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
Mason City
06/88
08/90
Peoples Natural Gas Co.
Dubuque
06/88
08/90
Red Oak City Landfi11
Red Oak
06/86
03/89
Shaw Avenue Dunp
Charles City
12/82
09/83
Sheller-Globe Corp. Disposal
Keokuk
05/89
08/90
Vogel Paint & Wax Co.
Orange City
10/84
06/86
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
Waterloo
10/92
White Farm Equipment Co. Dunp
Charles City
06/88
08/90
Federal Facility Sites
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
Middletown
07/89
08/90
09/83
08/90
10/89
08/90
09/84
09/84
11/89
08/90
A 1 F Material Reclaiming, Inc.
Greenup
07/82
09/83
Acme Solvent Reclafming(Morristown Plant
Morristown
07/82
09/83
Adams County Ouincy Landfills 213
Ouincy
06/88
08/90
Amoco Chemicals (Joliet Landfill)
Joliet
06/88
02/90
Beloit Corp.
Rockton
06/88
08/90
Belvidere Municipal Landfill
Belvidere
12/82
09/83
Byron Salvage Yard
Byron
12/82
09/83
Central Illinois Public Service Co.
Taylorville
06/88
08/90
Cross Brothers Pail Recycling (Peafcroke)
Peafcroke Township
12/82
09/83
DuPage County Landfill/Blackwell Forest
Warrenvflle
06/88
02/90
Galesburg/Koppers Co.
Galesburg
12/82
09/83
H.0.0. Landfill
Antioch
09/85
02/90
Ilada Energy Co.
East Cape Girardeau
06/88
10/89
Interstate Pollution Control, Inc
Rockford
06/88
03/89
Johns-ManvHle Corp.
Waukegan
12/82
09/83
Kerr-Mcfiee (Kress Creek)
0i4>age County
10/84
02/91
Kerr-McGee (Reed-Keppler Park)
West Chicago
10/84
08/90
11
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
Hay 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed* Final Motes
Kerr-McGee (Residential Areas)
W Chic/DuPage Cnty
10/84
08/90
Kerr-HcGee (Sewage Treatment Plant)
West Chicago
10/84
08/90
LaSalle Electric Utilities
LaSalle
12/82
09/83
Lenz Oil Service, Inc.
Lemont
06/88
10/89
MIG/Dewane Landfill
Belvidere
10/89
08/90
NL Industries/Taracorp Lead Smelter
Granite City
10/84
06/86
Ottawa Radiation Areas
Ottawa
07/91
10/92
Outboard Marine Corp.
Waukegan
10/81
09/83
Pagel's Pit
Rockford
10/84
06/86
Parsons Casket Hardware Co.
Belvidere
01/87
07/87
Southeast Rockford Gd Utr Contamination
Rockford
06/88
03/89
Tri-County Landfill/Waste Mgmt Illinois
South Elgin
06/86
03/89
Velsicol Chemical Corp.(Illinois)
Marshall
12/82
09/83
Wauconda Sand I Gravel
Wauconda
07/82
09/83
Woodstock Mmicipal Landfill
Woodstock
06/88
10/89
Yeoman Creek Landfill
Waukegan
06/88
03/89
Federal Facility Sites
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
Joliet
04/85
03/89
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Mfg Area)
Joliet
10/84
07/87
Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard MWR (USDO!
Carterville
10/84
07/87
Savanna Army Depot Activity
Savanna
10/84
03/89
33 General Superfund Sites * 4 Federal Facility Sites
» 37
General Superfund Sites
American Chemical Service, Inc.
Griffith
09/83
09/84
Bennett Stone Quarry
Bloomington
09/83
09/84
Carter Lee Limber Co.
Indianapolis
06/88
03/89
Columbus Old Municipal Landfill #1
Coluafcus
09/85
06/86
Conrail Rail Yard (Elkhart)
Elkhart
06/88
08/90
Continental Steel Corp.
Kokomo
06/88
03/89
Oouglass Road/Uniroyal, Inc., Landfill
Mishawaka
06/86
03/89
Envirochem Corp.
Zionsville
12/82
09/83
Fisher-Calo
LaPorte
12/82
09/83
Fort Wayne Reduction Dunp
Fort Wayne
10/84
06/86
Galen Myers Dunp/Drun Salvage
Osceola
06/88
03/89
Himco Ourp
Elkhart
06/88
02/90
Lake Sandy Jo (MM Landfill)
Gary
12/82
09/83
Lakeland Disposal Service, Inc.
Claypool
06/88
03/89
Lemon Lane Landfill
Bloomington
12/82
09/83
MIDCO I
Gary
12/82
09/83
MIDCO II
Gary
10/84
06/86
Main Street Well Field
Elkhart
12/82
09/83
Marion (Bragg) Diwp
Marion
12/82
09/83
Meal's Dunp (Spencer)
Spencer
10/84
06/86
Meal's Landfill (Bloomington)
Bloomington
10/81
09/83
Ninth Avenue Du*p
Gary
12/82
09/83
Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc
Zionsville
09/8)
09/84
Prestolite Battery Division
Vine ernes
09/85
10/89
Reilly Tar I Chemical(Indianapolis Plant
Indianapolis
09/83
09/84
Seymour Recycling Corp.
Seymour
10/81
09/83
Southside Sanitary Landfill
Indianapolis
06/86
03/89
Tippecanoe Sanitary Landfill, Inc
Lafayette
06/88
08/90
Tri-State Plating
Coluabus
09/85
06/86
U.S. Smelter ft Lead Refinery Inc.
East Chicago
02/92
Waste, Inc., Landfill
Michigan City
04/85
07/87
Wayne Waste Oil
Colwfeia City
12/82
09/83
Whiteford Sales 1 Service/Nationaleaae
South Bend
06/88
08/90
33 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites
« 33
General Superfund Sites
06/88
29th I Mead Ground Water Contamination
Wichita
02/90
12
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
St
Site Name
Location
Date
Proposed3 Final
Notes
57th and North Broadway Streets Sit*
Wichita Heights
02/92
10/92
Arkansas City Dunp
Arkansas City
10/81
09/83
Cherokee County
Cherokee County
12/82
09/83
Doepke Disposal (HotIiday)
Johnson County
12/82
09/83
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Topeka
06/88
03/89
Obee Road
Hutchinson
01/87
07/87
Pester Refinery Co.
El Dorado
06/88
03/89
Strother Field Industrial Park
Cowley County
10/84
06/86
Federal Facility Sites
Fort Riley
Junction City
07/89
08/90
9 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites * 10
General Superfund Sites
A.L. Taylor (Valley of Drims)
Brooks
10/81
09/83
Airco
Calvert City
12/82
09/84
B.F. Goodrich
Calvert City
12/82
09/83
Brantley Landfill
Island
06/88
02/90
Caldwell Lace Leather Co., Inc.
Auburn
06/88
08/90
Distler Brickyard
West Point
12/82
09/83
Distler Farm
Jefferson County
07/82
09/83
Fort Hartford Coal Co. Stone Quarry
Olaton
06/88
08/90
General Tire ft RubberCHayfield Landfill)
Hayfield
06/88
02/90
Green River Disposal, Inc.
Maceo
06/88
08/90
Howe Valley Landfill
Howe Valley
06/86
07/87
Lee's Lane Landfill
Louisville
07/82
09/83
Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal
Hillsboro
10/84
06/86
National Electric Coil/Cooper Industies
Dayhoit
07/91
10/92
National Southwire Alumimm Co.
Hawesville
07/91
Newport Dunp
Newport
12/82
09/83
Red Penn Sanitation Co. Landfill
Peewee Valley
06/88
03/89
Smith's Farm
Brooks
10/84
06/86
Tri-City Disposal Co.
ShepherdsviIle
06/88
03/89
Federal Facility Sites
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
Paducah
OS/93
19 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites * 20
General Superfund Sites
American Creosote Works, Inc (Uinnfield)
Uinnfield
02/92
10/92
Bayou Bonfouca
Slidell
12/82
09/83
Bayou Sorrel Site
Bayou Sorrel
07/82
09/84
CIeve Reber
Sorrento
12/82
09/83
Combustion, Inc.
DenhaM Springs
06/86
08/90
0.1. Hud, Inc.
Abbeville
06/88
10/89
Dutchtown Treatment Plant
Ascension Parish
01/87
07/87
Gulf Coast Vacuus Services
Abbeville
06/88
03/89
Old Inger Oil Refinery
Darrow
07/82
09/83
PAB Oil ft Chemical Service, Inc.
Abbeville
06/88
03/89
Petro-Processors of Louisiana Inc
Scotlandvilie
09/83
09/84
Federal Facility Sites
Louisiana Army Anuiition Plant
Doyline
10/84
03/89
11 General Sup«rfir
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
Nay 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed" Final Notes6
Industri-Plex
Woburn
10/81
09/83
Iron Horse Park
Billerica
09/83
09/84
New Bedford Site
New Bedford
07/82
09/83
Norwood PCBs
Norwood
10/84
06/86
Nyanza Chemical Waste Dump
Ashland
10/81
09/83
PSC Resources
Palmer
12/82
09/83
Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering Corp.
Plymouth
12/82
09/83
Re-Solve, Inc.
Dartmouth
10/81
09/83
Rose Disposal Pit
Lanesboro
10/84
06/86
Salem Acres
Salem
10/84
06/86
Shpeck Landfill
Norton/Attleboro
10/84
06/86
Si Iresim Chemical Corp.
Lowell
07/82
09/83
Sullivan's Ledge
New Bedford
09/83
09/84
U.K. Grace & Co Inc (Acton Plant)
Acton
12/82
09/83
Wells UH
Woburn
12/82
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Fort Devens
Fort Devens
07/89
11/89
Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
Middlesex County
07/89
02/90
Hanscom Air Force Base
Bedford
05/93
Natick Laboratory Army Research,DIE Cntr
Natick
05/93
Otis Air National Guard /Camp Edwards
Falmouth
07/89
11/89
23 General Superfund Sites ¦» 5 Federal Facility Sites » 28
General Superfund Sites
Bush Valley Landli U
Abingdon
06/88
03/89
Kane fc Lombard Street Drum
Baltimore
10/84
06/86
Limestone Road
Cuifeer I and
12/82
09/83
Mid-Atlantic Uood Preserver*, Inc
Harmene
10/84
06/86
Orchanc* Products, Inc.
Cecil County
05/93
Sand, Gravel & Stone
Elkton
12/82
09/83
Southern Maryland Wood Treating
Hollywood
10/84
06/86
Spectron, Inc.
Cecil County
10/92
WoodIawn County Landfill
UoodI aun
01/87
07/87
Federal Facility Sites
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Edgewood
04/85
02/90
Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsvilie LF
Aberdeen
04/85
10/89
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
Beltsville
05/93
9 General Superfund Sites ~ 3 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 12
General Superfund Sites
McKin Co.
Gray
12/82
09/83
O'Connor Co.
Auguata
12/82
09/83
Pinette's Salvage Yard
Washburn
12/82
09/83
Saco Municipal Landfill
Saco
06/88
02/90
Saco Tannery Uaate Pits
Saco
12/82
09/83
Union Chemical Co., Inc.
South Hope
04/85
10/89
Uinthrop Landfill
Uinthrop
10/81
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Brunswick
10/84
07/87
Loring Air Force Base
Limestone
07/89
02/90
7 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Site* >9
General Superfund Sites
Adam's Plating
Lansing
06/88
03/89
Albion-Sheridan Township Landfill
Albion
06/88
10/89
Allied Paper/Portage Ck/Kalamazoo River
Kalamazoo
05/89
08/90
American Anodeo, inc.
Ionia
06/86
03/89
Anderson Development Co.
Adrian
12/82
09/83
Auto (on Chemicals, trie.
Kalamazoo
*2/82
09/S3
Avenue "E" Ground Water Contamination
Traversa City
10/84
06/86
Barrels, Inc.
Lansing
01/87
10/89
14
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed3 Final Notes'*
Bendix Corp./Mlied Automotive
St. Joseph
06/88
02/90
Berlin I Farro
Swartz Creek
07/82
09/83
Bofors Nobel, Inc.
Muskegon
06/88
03/89
Burrows Sanitation
Hartford
09/83
09/84
Butteruorth #2 Landfill
Grand Rapids
12/82
09/83
Camelton Industries, Inc.
Sault Sainte Marie
06/88
08/90
Carter Industrials, Inc.
Detroit
06/88
03/89
Cemetery Dunp
Rose Center
12/82
09/83
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Charlevoix
12/82
09/83
Cham Central
Wyoming Township
12/82
09/83
Clare Uater Supply
Clare
12/82
09/84
Cliff/Dow Dunp
Marquette
12/82
09/83
Duel I I Gardner Landfill
Dal ton Township
12/82
09/83
Electrovoice
Buchanan
12/82
09/84
Folkertsma Refuse
Grand Rapids
06/86
03/89
Forest Waste Products
Otisville
12/82
09/83
G&H Landfill
Utica
07/82
09/83
Grand Traverse Overall Supply Co.
Greilickville
12/82
09/83
Gratiot County Landfill
St. Louis
10/81
09/83
H. Brown Co., Inc.
Grand Rapids
04/85
06/86
Hedblun Industries
Oscoda
12/82
09/83
Hi-Mill Manufacturing Co.
Highland
06/88
02/90
Ionia City Landfill
Ionia
12/82
09/83
J ( L Landfill
Rochester Hills
06/86
03/89
K&L Avenue Landfill
Oshtemo Township
12/82
09/83
Kaydon Corp.
Muskegon
06/88
02/90
Kent City Mobile Home Park
Kent City
09/85
07/87
Kentwood Landfill
Kentwood
12/82
09/83
Kysor Industrial Corp.
Cadillac
09/85
10/89
Liquid Disposal, Inc.
Utica
07/82
09/83
Mason County Landfill
Pere Marquette Twp
12/82
09/83
McGraw Edison Corp.
Albion
12/82
09/83
Metamora Landfill
Metamora
09/83
09/84
Michigan DisposaKCork Street Landfill)
Kalamazoo
10/84
02/90
Motor Wheel, Inc.
Lansing
10/84
06/86
Muskegon Chemical Co.
Whitehall
06/88
02/90
North Bronson Industrial Area
Bronson
10/84
06/86
Northerrtaire Plating
Cadillac
07/82
09/83
Novaco Industries
Temperance
12/82
09/83
Organic Chemicals, Inc.
Grandvilla
12/82
09/83
Ossineke Ground Water Contamination
Ossineke
12/82
09/83
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical Co.
Dalton Township
07/82
09/83
Packaging Corp. of America
Filer City
12/82
09/83
Parsons chemical Works, Inc.
Grand Ladge
06/88
03/89
Peerless Plating Co.
Muskegon
06/88
08/90
Petoskey Municipal Wall Field
Petoskey
12/82
09/83
Rasmussen's Oimp
Green Oak Township
12/82
09/83
Rockwell International Corp. (Allegan)
Allegan
04/85
07/87
Rose Township Dimp
Roaa Township
07/82
09/83
Roto-Finish Co., Inc.
Kalamazoo
10/84
06/86
SCA Independent Landfill
Muskegon Heights
12/82
09/83
Shiawassee River
Howell
12/82
09/83
South Macomb Disposal (Landfills 9 I 9A)
Macomb Township
10/84
06/86
Southwest Ottawa County Landfill
Park Township
12/82
09/83
Sparta Landfill
Sparta Township
12/82
09/83
Spartan Chemical Co.
Wyoming
12/82
09/83
Spiegelberg Landfill
Green Oak Township
12/82
09/83
Springfield Township Dunp
Davisburg
12/82
09/83
State Disposal Landfill, Inc.
Grand Rapids
06/88
02/90
Sturgis Municipal Walls
Sturgis
09/83
09/84
Tar Lake
Mancetona Township
12/82
09/83
15
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St
Site Nam
Location
Proposed" Final
Note!
Thermo-Chen, Inc.
Muskegon
10/84
06/86
Torch Lake
Houghton County
10/84
06/86
U.S. Aviex
Howard Township
12/82
09/83
Velsicol Chemical Corp.(Michigan)
St. Louia
12/82
09/83
Verona Wall Field
Battle Creek
07/82
09/83
Wash King Laundry
Pleasant Plaina Twp
12/82
09/83
Waste Management of Michigan (Holland)
Holland
10/84
06/86
76 General Superfund Sites *¦ 0 Federal Facility Sites 1 76
General Superfund Sites
Agate Lake Scrapyard
Fairview Township
10/84
06/86
Arrowhead Refinery Co.
Hernantown
09/83
09/84
Boise Cascade/Onan Corp./Medtronics,Inc.
Fridley
09/83
09/84
Burlington Northern (Brairmrd/Baxter)
Bra inerd/Baxter
07/82
09/83
Oakhue Sanitary Landfill
Cannon Falls
10/89
08/90
East Bethel Demolition Landfill
East Bethel Township
09/85
06/86
FMC Corp. (Fridley Plant)
Fridley
07/82
09/83
Freeway Sanitary Landfill
Burnsville
09/85
06/86
General Mills/Henkel Corp.
Minneapolis
09/83
09/84
Joalyn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
Brooklyn Center
09/83
09/84
Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp.
Pine Bend
10/84
06/86
Koppera Coka
St. Paul
10/81
09/83
Kutmer Sanitary Landfill
Bemidj i
10/84
06/86
Kurt Manufacturing Co.
Fridley
10/84
06/86
LaCrand Sanitary Landfill
LaGrand Township
06/86
07/87
Lake El no Airport /GW Contamination
flaytown Township
10/92
lehil1ier/Menkato Site
Lehillier/Manfcato
07/82
09/83
Long Prairie Ground Water Contamination
Long Prafrie
10/84
06/86
Marti I lis i Gibbs/Sell Limber I Poole
New Brighton
09/83
09/84
NL Industries/Taracorp/Golden Auto
St. Louis Park
10/81
09/83
New Brighton/Arden Hi I la
New Brighton
07/82
09/83
Nutting Truck I Caster Co.
Faribault
09/83
09/84
Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill
Oak Grove Township
10/84
06/86
Oakdale Dump
Oakdale
10/81
09/83
Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
Oronoco
10/84
06/86
Perham Arsenic Site
Perham
09/83
09/84
Pine Bend Sanitary Landfill
Dakota County
10/84
06/86
Reilly TartCham (St. Louis Park Plant)
St. Louia Park
10/81
09/83
Ritari Post I Pole
Sebeka
01/87
07/87
South Andover Site
Andover
10/81
09/83
St. Augusta San Landfill/Engen Dump
St. Augusta Township
09/85
07/87
St. Louis River Site
St. Louia County
09/83
09/84
St. Regis Paper Co.
Cass Lake
09/83
09/84
University Minnesota (Rosemouit Res Can)
Rosemount
10/84
06/86
Waite Park Wells
Waite Park
09/85
06/86
Washington County Landfill
Laka Elmo
09/83
09/84
Waste Disposal Engineering
Andover
07/82
09/83
Milttaker Corp.
Minneapolis
09/83
09/84
Windom Ouap
Windom
10/84
06/86
Federal Facility Sites
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
Fridley
07/89
11/89
Twin Cities Air Poree >ase(SAR Landfill)
Minneapolis
01/87
07/87
39 General Superfund Sites * 2 Federal Facility sites * 41
General Superfund Sites
Bee Cee Manufacturing Co.
Maiden
10/84
06/86
Big River Nina Tailings/St. Joe Minerals
Oeslog*
02/92
10/92
Conservation Chemical Co.
Kansas City
04/85
10/89
Ellisville Sit*
Elllsvilla
10/81
09/83
Fulbright Landfill
Springfield
10/81
09/83
Kam-Pest Laboratories
Cape Girerdeau
01/87
10/89
16
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed4 Final Notesb
Lee Chemical
Liberty
10/84
06/86
Mlnker/Stout/Romalne Creek
Imperial
12/82
09/83
Missouri Electric Works
Cape Girardeau
06/88
02/90
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Springfield
10/84
06/86
Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt
Jasper County
06/88
08/90
Quality Plating
Sikeston
10/84
06/86
Shenandoah Stables
Moscow Mills
12/82
09/83
Solid State Circuits, Inc.
Republic
10/84
06/86
St Louis Airport/HIS/Futura Coatings Co.
St. Louis County
05/89
10/89
Syntex Facility
Verona
12/82
09/83
Times Beach Site
Times Beach
03/83
09/83
Valley Park TCE
Valley Park
04/85
06/86
West lake Landfill
Bridget on
10/89
08/90
Wheeling Disposal Service Co. Landfill
Amazonia
01/87
10/89
Federal Facility Sites
Lake City Army Airmu. plant (NW Lagoon)
Independence
10/84
07/87
Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
St.Charles County
10/84
07/87
Weldon Spring Ouarry/Plsnt/Pitts(USOOE)
St. Charles County
07/89
02/90
20 General Superfund Sites + 3 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 23
General Superfund Sites
Flowood Site
Flowood
09/83
09/84
News am Brothers/Old Reichhold Chemicals
Columbia
10/84
06/86
Potter Co.
Wesson
05/93
3 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites ® 3
General Superfund Sites
Anaconda Co. Smelter
Anaconda
12/82
09/83
East Helena Site
East Helena
09/83
09/84
Idaho Pole Co.
Bozeman
10/84
06/86
Libby Ground Water Contamination
Libby
12/82
09/83
MilI town Reservoir sediments
Milltoun
12/82
09/83
Montana Pole and Treating
Butte
06/86
07/87
Mouat industries
Colunbue
10/84
06/86
Silver Bow Creek/Butte Area
Si I Bow/Deer Lodge
12/82
09/83
8 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites > 8
General Superfund Sites
ABC One Hour Cleaners
Jacksonvilie
06/88
03/89
Aberdeen Pesticide Dimpe
Aberdeen
01/87
03/89
Benfield Industries, Inc.
Hazelwood
06/88
10/89
Bypass 601 Ground Water Contamination
Concord
10/84
06/86
Cape Fear Wood Preserving
Fayettevitle
06/86
07/87
Carolina Transformer Co.
Fayetteville
01/87
07/87
Celenese Corp. (Shelby Fiber Operational
Shelby
10/84
06/86
Charles Macon Lagoon I Drue Storage
Cordova
01/87
07/87
Chemtronics, Inc.
Swamanoa
12/82.
09/83
FCX, Inc. (Statesvilte Ptant)
Statesvilte
06/88
02/90
FCX, Inc. (Washington Plant)
Washington
06/88
03/89
Geigy Chemical Corp. (Aberdeen Plant)
Aberdeen
06/88
10/89
General Electric Co/Shepherd Farm
East Flat Rock
02/92
Hevf-Duty Electric Co.
Goldsboro
05/89
08/90
JFO Electronics/Channel Master
Oxford
06/88
10/89
Jadco-Hughes Facility
Belmont
10/84
06/86
Koppers Co Inc (Morrlsvllle Pint)
Morrisvflie
06/88
03/89
Martin-Marietta, Sodyeco, Inc.
Charlotte
12/82
09/83
NC State UnlversitytLot 86,Farm Unit #1)
Raleigh
10/84
06/86
National Starch & Chemical Corp.
Salisbury
04/85
10/89
Mew Hanover Cnty Airport Burn Pit
Wilmington
06/88
03/89
Patter's Septic Tank Service Pits
Kaco
06/88
05/89
Federal Facility Sites
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
Onslow County
06/88
10/89
22 General Siperfund sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites * 23
17
-------
national Priorities List
final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 199J
Date
St Sit# Name Location Proposed* Final Notesb
ND General Superfird Site*
Arsenic Trioxide Site
Hinot Landfi11
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
HE General Superfund Sites
10th Street Site
American Shizuki/ogallala Electronics Co
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
Cleburn Street Well
Hastings Ground Water Contamination
Lindsay Manufacturing Co.
Nebraska Ordnance Plant (Former)
Sherwood Medical Co.
Waver Iy Ground Uater Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
Cornhusker Arm/ Ammunition Plant
9 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites
NH General Superfund Sites
Auburn Road Landfill
Ccakley LandfiU
Dover Municipal Landfill
Fletcher's Faint Works 1 Storage
Helton Circle Ground Uater Curiam
(earsarg* Metallurgical Corp.
Keefe Environmental Services
Nottclo Pig Farm
New Hampshire Plating Co.
Ottati & Goss/Kfngston Steel Dria*
Savage Municipal Uater Supply
Scmersworth Sanitary Landfill
South Municipal Water Supply U«lI
Sylvester
Tibbets Road
Tinkham Garage
Federal Facility sites
Pease Air Force Base
16 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites
NJ General Superfund Sites
A. 0. Polymer
American Cyanamid Co.
Asbestos Ounp
Bog Creek Fans
Brick Township Landfill
Bridgeport lental t Oil Servient
Brook Inductrial Park
Burnt Fly Bog
CPS/Madison Industries
Caldwell Trucking Co.
Chemical Control
Chemical Insecticide Corp.
Chemical Leama*> Tank Lines, Inc.
Chemsol, Inc.
Ciba-Geigy Corp.
Cirmamirvson Ground Uater Contamination
Combe Fill North Landfill
Combe Fflt South Landff11
Cos den Chemical Coatings Corp.
Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.
Southeastern HO
10/81
09/83
Mi not
06/88
03/89
Coltsnbus
10/89
08/90
Ogtllala
10/92
Brtno
10/92
Grand Island
07/91
10/92
Hastings
tO/84
06/86
Lindsay
10/84
10/89
Mead
10/89
08/90
Norfolk
07/91
70/92
Waverly
10/84
06/86
Hall Cowity
10/84
07/87
Londonderry
12/82
09/83
North Hanptori
10/84
06/86
Dover
12/82
09/83
Nit ford
06/38
02/09
Contender ry
06/88
01/89
Cora*ay
09/83
09/84
Epping
10/81
09/83
Raymond
04/85
C7/B7
Merrimack
07/91
10/92
Kingston
10/81
09/83
Mi (ford
09/83
09/84
Soatrsuorth
12/82
09/83
Peterborough
09/83
09/84
Nashua
10/81
09/83
Barr-irtgton
04/85
06/86
Londonderry
12/82
09/83
Portsmouth/Mew i rig ton
07/89
02/90
17
Sparta Township
12/82
09/83
Bound Brook
12/82
09/83
Mi Kington
12/62
09/83
HowetI Township
12/82
09/83
Brick Township
12/82
09/83
Bridgeport
10/81 .
09/83
Bound Brook
06/88
10/89
Marlboro Township
10/81
09/83
Old Bridge Township
12/82
09/83
Fairfield
12/82
09/83
Eliubeth
10/81
09/83
Edison Township
10/89
08/90
Bridgeport
09/83
09/84
Piscataway
12/82
09/83
Tome River
12/82
09/83
Cimaminson Township
10/84
06/86
Mount 01ive Twp
12/82
09/83
Chaster Townsftfp
12/82
09/83
Beverly
01/87
07/87
Saddle Brook Tup
01/87
07/87
18
-------
St
¦Site N«
national Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Location
Date
Proposed* Final
Notes
DMmperio Property
Dayco Corp./I.E Carpenter Co.
De Rewal Chemical Co.
Deli I ah Road
Denzer t Schafer X-Ray Co.
Diamond Alkali Co.
Dover Municipal Well 4
Ellis Property
Evor Phillips Leasing
Ewan Property
Fair Lawn Well Field
Florence Land Recontouring Landfill
Fried Industries
GEMS Landfill
Garden State CJeaners Co.
Gten Ridge Radiun site
Global Sanitary Landfill
Goose Farm
Helen Kramer Landfill
Hercules, [nc. (Gibtostown Plant)
Higgins Disposal
Higgins Farm
Hopkins Farm
Horseshoe Road
Imperial Of I Co., Inc./Champion Chemicals
Industrial LateK Corp.
J IS Landfill
Jackson township landfill
Cauffman ft Mlnteer, lie.
tfin-Buc landfi'K
King of Prussia
Landfill t Development Co.
Lang Property
Lipari Landfill
Lodi Municipal Well
Lone Pine Landfill
Mannheim Avenue Dunp
Haywood Chemical Co.
MetaItec/Aerosys t ems
Monitor Devices/lntereircuits Inc
Monroe Township Landfill
Monte lair/West Orange Radiua Site
Montgomery Township Housing Development
Myers Property
NL Industries
Nascolite Corp.
PJ» Landfill
Pepe Field
Pijak Fans
Pohatcong Vailay (round Water Contaminst
Pomona Oaks Reeldtntiil Wells
Price Landfill
Radiation Technology, Inc.
Retch Farms
Renora, Inc.
Ringwood Mines/Landfill
Rockaway Borough Well Field
Rocksuay Township Wells
Rocky Hill Municipal Well
Roebting Steel Co,.
Sayrevilie Landfill
Hamilton Township
10/81
09/83
Wharton Borough
04/85
07/87
Kingwood Township
09/83
09/84
Egg Harbor Township
09/83
09/84
Bayvllle
12/82
09/83
Newark
09/83
09/84
Dover Township
12/82
09/83
Evesham Township
12/82
09/83
Old Bridge Township
12/82
09/83
Shamong Township
09/83
09/84
Fair Lawn
12/82
09/83
Florence Township
09/83
09/84
East Brunswick Twp
10/84
06/86
Gloucester Township
07/82
09/83
tffracoU
06/88
03/89
Glen Rfdge
10/84
02/85
Old Bridge Township
06/88
03/89
? 1 mate ad Township
10/81
09/83
Mantua Township
07/82
09/83
Gibbstoun
12/82
09/83
Kingston
06/88
08/90
Franklin Township
06/88
03/89
Plumatead Township
09/83
09/84
SayreviLie
05/93
Morgan*ill*
12/82
09/83
Wellington iorough
06/88
03/89
Janesburg/S. Brnsuefc
12/82
09/85
Jackson Township
12/82
09/83
Jobstown
06/88
03/89
Edison Township
f0/8f
09/83
Wlnslow Township
12/82
09/83
Mount Holly
09/83
09/84
Pemtoerton Township
12/82
09/83
Pitman
10/81
09/83
Lodi
10/84
08/90
Freehold Township
10/81
09/83
Galloway Township
12/82
09/83
Meywood/Rochelle Pk
12/82
09/83
Franklin Borough
12/82
09/83
Wall Townahip
04/85
06/86
Monroe Township
12/82
09/83
Montelair/V Orange
10/84
02/85
Montgomery Township
12/82
09/83
Franklin Township
12/82
09/83
Pedrfcfctown
f 2/82
09/85
MiUville
09/83
09/84
Jersey City
12/82
09/83
Boonton
12/82
09/83
PluMteed Township
10/81
09/83
Warren Cowty
06/88
03/89
Galloway Township
10/84
06/86
PleeaantWHe
10/8)
09/83
Rockaway Township
09/81
09/84
Pleasant Plaine
12/82
09/83
Edison Township
12/82
09/83
lingwood Borough
12/82
09/83
Rockaway Township
12/82
09/83
Rockaway
12/82
09/83
Rocky Hilt Borough
12/82
09/83
Florence
12/82
09/83
Sayrevilie
12/82
09/83
19
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
Kay 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Propened* Final Hotel
Scientific Chemical Processing
Carlstadt
12/82
09/83
Sharkey Landfill
Parsippeny/Troy Mis
12/82
09/83
Shieldatloy Corp.
Newfield Borough
09/83
09/84
South Brunswick Landfill
South Brunswick
12/82
09/83
South Jersey Clothing Co.
Minotola
06/88
10/89
Spence Farm
Plumstead Township
10/81
09/83
Swop* Oil I Chen ice I Co.
Perns auk en
07/82
09/83
Syncon Resins
South Kearny
07/82
09/83
Tabernacle Drue Dtmp
Tabernacle Township
09/83
09/84
U.S. Radius Corp.
Orange
12/82
09/83
Universal Oil Products(Cheniical Division
East Rutherford
12/82
09/83
Upper Deerfield Township Sanit. Landfill
Upper Deerfietd Twp
09/83
09/84
Ventron/Velsicol
Wood Ridge Borough
09/83
09/84
Vineland Chemical Co., Inc.
VineI and
09/83
09/84
Vineland State School
Vineland
12/82
09/83
Waldick Aerospace Devices, Inc.
Wall Township
10/84
06/86
White Chemical Corp.
Newark
05/91
09/91
Wi L1 iarns Property
Swainton
12/82
09/83
wflson Farm
Pluasteed Township
09/83
09/84
Uitco Chemical Corp.(Oakland Pit)
Oakland
06/88
10/89
Woodland Route 532 Dunp
Woodland Township
09/83
09/84
Woodland Route 72 Dtmp
Woodland Township
09/83
09/84
Federal Facility Sites
Federal Aviation Acinin. Tee*. CntrfUSOOT
Atlantic CoLfity
07/89
08/90
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Paetoerton Township
10/84
07/87
Naval Air Engineering Center
Lekehurst
09/85
07/87
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Colts Meek
10/84
08/90
Picatinny Arsenal
Rockewey Township
07/89
02/90
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOC)
Wayne Township
09/83
09/84
103 General Superfund Sites * 6 Federal Facility Sites
»
109
General Superfund Sites
AT I SF (Clovis)
Clovis
10/81
09/83
ATtSF (Albuquerque)
Albuquerque
10/92
Cimarron Mining Corp.
Carrizozo
06/88
10/89
Cleveland Mi 11
SiIver City
06/88
03/89
Homestake Mining Co.
Mi lan
10/81
09/83
Prewitt Abandoned Refinery
Prewi tt
06/88
08/90
Rinchem Co., Inc.
Albuquerque
10/92
South Valley
Albuquerque
07/82
09/83
United Mucleer Corp.
Church Rock
10/81
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Cal West Metals (USSBA)
Lami tar
06/88
03/89
Lee Acres Landfill (US001)
Farmington
06/88
08/90
9 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites *
It
General Superfund Sites
Carson River Mercury Site
Lyon/Churchill Cnty
10/89
08/90
1 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites »
1
General Superfund Sites
Action Anodizing, Plating, 1 Polishing
Cop iague
06/88
03/89
American Thermostat Co.
South Cairo
12/82
09/83
Anchor Chemicals
Hicksvflie
10/84
06/86
Applied Environmental Services
Glenwood Landing
10/84
06/86
Betavia Landfill
Batavia
10/81
09/83
BioCLfnical Laboratories, Inc.
Bohemia
06/86
03/89
Brewster Well Field
Putnam Cocrity
12/82
09/83
Byron Berrel 1 Drue
Byron
10/84
06/86
C 4 J Disposal Leasing Co. Dunp
Hamilton
06/88
03/89
Carroll 1 Duties Sewage Disposal
Port Jervts
06/88
02/90
20
-------
national Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites tby State)
May 1993
Date
St
Site Ha
Location
Proposed
Final
Notes
Circuitron Corp,
Claremont Polychemical
Clothier Disposal
Cotesvilie Municipal Landfill
Conk I in Dunps
Cortese Landfill
Endicott Village Well Field
FMC Corp. (Dublin Road Landfill)
Facet Enterprises, Inc.
Forest Glen Mobile Home Subdivision
Fulton Terminals
GE Moreau
General HotorsCCentral Foundry Division)
Genzsle Plating Co.
Goldisc Recordings, Inc.
Havitand Conplex
Hertel Landfill
Hooker (TC2nd Street)
Hacker (Hyde Park)
Hooker
-------
St
Site Name
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Location
Date
Proposed3 Final
Mot**
Suffem Village Well Field
Village of Sufferr
10/8-4
06/86
Syosset Landfill
Oyster Bay
12/82
09/83
Tri-Cities Barrel Co., Inc.
Port Crane
05/89
10/89
Tronic Plating Co., Inc.
Farmingdate
10/84
06/86
Vestal Water Supply Well 1-1
Vestal
12/82
09/83
Vestal Water Supply Well 4-2
Vestal
12/82
09/83
Volney Municipal Landfill
Town of Volney
10/84
06/86
Warwick Landfill
Warwick
09/85
03/89
Wide Beach Development
Brant
12/82
09/83
York Oil Co.
Moi ra
07/82
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
Upton
07/89
11/89
Griffiss Air Force Base
Rome
10/84
07/87
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Plattsburgh
07/89
11/89
Seneca Army Depot
Romulus
07/89
08/90
81 General Super-fund Sites * 4 Federal Facility Sites ~ 85
OH General Superfund Sites
Allied Chemical & 1 ronton Coke
1 ronton
12/82
09/83
AIsco Anaconda
Gnadenhutten
10/84
06/86
Arcanu* Iron t Metal
Darke County
12/82
09/83
Big D Campground
Kingsville
12/82
09/83
Bowers Landfill
Circlevilie
12/82
09/83
Buckeye Reclamation
St. Clairsville
12/82
09/83
Chem-Oyne
HamiIton
10/81
09/83
Coshocton Landfill
Franklin Township
12/82
09/83
Diamond Shamrock Corp.(Painesvilie Work)
Painesvilie
05/93
Dover Chemical Corp.
Dover
05/93
E.H. Schilling Landfill
Hamilton Township
12/82
09/83
Fields Brook
Ashtabula
10/81
09/83
Fultz Landfill
Jackson Township
12/82
09/83
Industrial Excess Landfill
Uniontown
10/B4
06/86
Laskin/Poplar Oil Co.
Jefferson Township
07/82
09/83
Miami County Incinerator
Troy
09/83
09/84
Nease Chemical
Salem
12/82
09/83
New Lyme Landfill
New Lyme
12/82
09/83
Old Mill
Rock Creek
12/82
09/83
Ormet Corp.
Hannibal
09/85
07/87
Powell Road Landfill
Dayton
09/83
09/84
Pristine, Inc.
Reading
12/82
09/83
Reilly Tar A Chemical(Dover Plant)
Dover
06/88
08/90
Republic Steel Corp. Quarry
Elyria
10/84
06/86
Sanitary Landfill Co. (Industrial Waste)
Dayton
10/84
06/86
Skinner Landfi11
West Chester
12/82
09/83
South Point Plant
South Point
09/83
09/84
Sumtit National
Deerfield Township
10/81
09/83
TRW, Inc. (Minerva Plant)
Minerva
06/86
03/89
United Scrap Lead Co., Inc.
Troy
09/83
09/84
Van Dale Junkyard
Marietta
10/84
06/86
Zanesvitle Well Field
Zanesville
12/82
09/83
Federal Facility SttM
Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
Fernald
07/89
11/89
Mound Plant (USOOE)
Miamisburg
07/89
11/89
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton
06/88
10/89
32 General Superfmf Sites ~ 3 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 35
General Superfund Sites
Compass Industries (Avery Drive)
Tulsa
09/83
09/84
Double Eagle Refinery Co.
Oklahoma City
06/88
03/89
Fourth Street Abandoned Refinery
Oklahoma City
06/88
03/89
Hardage/Criner
Criner
10/81
09/83
22
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Location
Date
Proposed8
Final
Motes
OR
PA
Ho*ley Road Sanitary Landfill
National Zinc Corp.
Oklahoma Refining Co.
Sand Springs Petrochemical Complex
Tar Creak (Ottawa County)
Tenth Street Dorp/Junkyard
Federal Facility Sites
Tinker Air ForcetSoldiar Cr/Bldg 300)
10 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites
General Superfund Sites
Allied Plating, Inc.
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contem.
Could, Inc.
Joseph Forest Products
Martin-Marietta Aluninun Co.
Northwest Pipe & Casing Co.
Teledyne Wah Chang
Union Pacific Railroad Tie Treatment
United Chrome Products, Inc.
federal Facility Sites
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoon*) -i.„ _
9 General Superfird sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites
General Superfund Sites
A.l.w. Frank/Mid-County Mustang
AMP, Inc. (Glen Rock Facility)
Aladdin Plating
Anbler Asbestos Piles
Austin Avenue Radiation Site
Avco Lycoming (Miltiawsport Division)
Bally Ground Water Contamination
Bell Landfill
Bendix Flight Systems Oivision
Berkley Products Co. Dunp
Berks Landfill
Berks Sand Pit
Blosenski Landfill
Boarhead Farm
Brodhead Creek
Brown's Battery Breaking
Bruin Lagoon
Butler Mine Tunnel
Sutz Landfill
C t D Recycling
Centre County Kepone
Comaodore Semiconductor Grot?
Craig farm On*
Crater Resources/Keystone Coka/Alan Wood
Crossley fane
Croydon TCE
Cryochem, Inc. .....
Delta Quarries I Diap./Stotler Landfill
Oorney Road Landfill
Dougtossvitle Disposal
Drake Cheeiical
Dublin TCE Site
East Mount 2ion
Eastern Diversified Metals
CliubathtoMn Landfill
Fischer & Porter Co.
Oklahoma City
Bartlesvilie
Cyril
Sand Springs
Ottawa County
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma City
11
Portland
Multnomah County
Portland
Joseph
The Oelles
Clackamas
Albany
The Dalles
Corvallis
Hermiston
06/88
05/93
06/88
09/83
10/81
01/87
04/85
01/87
05/93
12/82
06/88
10/84
02/92
12/82
10/89
09/83
10/8*
10
Exton
Glen Rock
Scott Township
A«bler
Delaware County
Witliameport
Bally Borough
Terry Township
Bridgewater Township
Denver
Spring Township
Longswamp Township
Wast Cain Township
Bridgeton Township
Stroudaburg
ShoemekersvfIle
Bruin Borough
Pittston
Stroudsburg
Foster Township
State College Boro
Lower Providence Twp
Parker
Upper Marion Tup
Hereford Township
Croydon
Uorsmn
Antia/Logan Twpa
Upper Macule Twp
PouglsssviUe
Lock Haven
DW»lln Borough
SprIngettsbury Tup
Hometown
Elizabethtown
Warminster
06/88
06/88
01/87
10/84
02/92
01/87
06/86
06/88
09/85
06/88
06/88
09/83
12/82
06/88
12/82
10/84
10/81
06/86
06/88
09/8S
12/82
01/87
12/82
02/92
07/91
09/05
06/86
06/86
09/83
12/82
07/82
10/89
09/83
06/86
06/88
12/82
02/90
02/90
06/86
09/83
07/87
07/87
02/90
09/83
03/89
06/86
10/92
09/83
08/90
09/84
07/87
10/89
10/89
07/87
06/86
10/92
02/90
07/87
10/89
07/87
03/89
10/89
09/84
09/83
03/89
09/83
06/86
09/83
07/87
03/89
07/87
09/S3
10/89
09/83
10/92
10/92
06/86
10/89
03/89
09/84
09/83
09/83
08/90
09/84
10/89
03/89
09/83
23
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1995
Date
St Site Nam Location Proposed* Final Not**11
Foot* Mineral Co.
East l*i ft eland Tup
02/92
10/92
Havertown PCP
Maverford
12/82
09/83
Hebe Us Auto Salvage Yard
Weisenberg Township
06/86
07/87
Neleva Landfill
North Whitehall Tup
12/02
09/83
He Her town Manufacturing Co.
Hellertoun
01/87
03/89
Henderson Road
Upper Merlon Tup
09/83
09/84
Hranlca Landfill
Buffalo Township
10/81
09/83
Hurterstown Road
Straban Township
10/84
06/86
Industrial Lane
Williams Township
09/83
09/84
Jackson Creek/Sitkin Smelting & Refinery
Maitland
06/88
10/89
Keystone Sanitation Landfill
Union Township
04/85
07/87
Kirrberton Sit*
Kinfcerton Borough
12/82
09/83
Lackawanna Refuse
Old Forge Borough
12/82
09/83
L indane Dunp
Harrison Tounship
10/81
09/83
Lord-Shope Landfill
Girard Township
10/81
09/83
MV Manufacturing
Valley Township
10/84
06/86
Malvern TCE
Malvern
12/82
09/83
McAdoo Associates
McAdoo Borough
10/81
09/83
Metal Banks
Philadelphia
12/82
09/83
Metropolitan Mirror and Glass
Frackville
02/92
10/92
Middletown Air Field
Middletown
10/84
06/86
Mill Creek Dunp
Erie
09/83
09/84
Modern Sanitation Landfill
Lower Windsor Twp
10/84
06/86
Moyerg Landfill
Eagleville
12/82
09/83
North Ptnn - Area 1
Souderton
01/87
03/89
North Penn - Area 12
Worcester
01/87
02/90
North Perm - Area 2
Hatfield
01/87
10/89
North Perm - Area S
Montgomery Township
01/87
03/89
North Penn - Area 6
Lansdale
01/87
03/89
North Penn - Area 7
North Wales
01/87
03/89
Novak Sanitary Landfill
South Whitehall Tup
01/87
10/89
Occidental Chemical Corp./Firestone Tire
Lower Pottsgrove Twp
06/88
10/89
Ohio River Park
Neville Island
10/89
08/90
Old City of York Landfill
Seven Valleys
12/82
09/83
Osborne Landfill
Grove City
07/82
09/83
Patmerton Zinc Pile
Palmerton
12/82
09/83
Paoti Rail Yard
Paoli
01/87
08/90
Pubticker Industries Inc.
Philadephia
05/89
10/89
Raymark
Hatboro
06/88
10/89
Recticon/Allied Steel Corp.
East Coventry Twp
06/88
10/89
Resin Disposal
Jefferson Borough
12/82
09/83
Revere Chemical Co.
Nockamixon Township
09/85
07/87
River Road Landfill/Waste Mngmnt, Inc.
Hermitage
01/87
10/89
Rodal* Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Emeus Borough
07/91
10/92
Route 940 Drill Dump
Pocono Sumait
09/85
07/87
Saegertown Industrial Area
Saegertown
06/88
02/90
Shriver's Corner
Straban Township
10/84
06/86
Stanley Kessler
King of Prussia
12/82
09/83
Strasburg Landfill
Newt in Township
06/88
03/89
Taylor 8orough Duap
Taylor Borough
09/83
09/84
Tonotli Corp.
Nesquthoninfl
06/88
10/89
Tysons Dump
Upper Her ion Tup
09/83
09/84
Ualsh Landfill
Honeybrook Townahip
09/83
09/84
UestinghouM Electronic (Sharon Plant)
Sharon
06/88
08/90
Ue-ttinghouse Elevator Co. Plant
Gettysburg
10/84
06/86
UMtmoyer Laboratories
Jackson Township
10/84
06/86
Uillitm Dick Lagoons
West Cain Township
01/87
07/87
York County Solid Waste/Refuse Landfill
Hopewell Township
04/85
07/87
Federal Facility Sites
04/85
Letterkenny Army Depot (POO Area)
Franklin Couity
03/89
Letterkemy Army Depot (SE Area)
Chaafcersburg
10/84
07/87
24
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed* Final Notesb
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Warminster Township
06/86
10/89
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Tobyhanna
07/89
08/90
94 General Superfund Sites ~ 4 Federal Facility Sites » 98
General Superfund Sites
Barceloneta Landfill
Florida Afuera
12/82
09/83
Fibers Public Supply Wells
Jobos
09/83
09/84
Frontera Creek
Rio Abajo
12/82
09/83
GE Wiring Devices
Juarta Diaz
12/82
09/83
Juncos Landfill
Juncos
12/82
09/83
RCA Del Caribe
Barcelonete
12/82
09/83
Upjohn Facility
Barceloneta
09/B3
09/84
Vega Alta Public Supply Wells
Vega Alta
09/83
09/84
Federal Facility Sites
Naval Security Group Activity
Sabana Seca
06/88
10/89
8 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites * 9
General Superfund Sites
Central Landfill
Johnston
10/84
06/86
Davis (GSR) Landfill
Glocester
04/85
06/86
Davis Liquid Waste
Smithfield
10/81
09/83
Landfill I Resource Recovery, Inc.(L&RR)
North Smithfield
12/82
09/83
Peterson/Puritan, Inc.
LincoIn/CunberIand
12/82
09/83
Picillo Farm
Coventry
10/81
09/83
Rose Hill Regional Landfill
South Kingstown
06/88
10/89
Stamina Mi lis. Inc.
North Smithfield
12/82
09/83
West Kingston Town Dunp/URI Disposal
South Kingstown
07/91
10/92
Western Sand t Gravel
Burrillville
10/B1
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Oavisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
North Kingstown
07/89
11/89
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
Newport
07/89
11/89
10 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites * 12
General Superfund Sites
Beaunit Corp. (Circular Knit t Dye)
Fountain Inn
06/88
02/90
Carolawn, Inc.
Fort Lawn
12/82
09/83
Elmore Waste Disposal
Greer
06/88
03/89
Geiger (C * N Oil)
Rantoules
09/83
09/84
Golden Strip Septic Tank Service
Sinpeonvilie
01/87
07/87
Helena Chemical Co. Landfill
Fairfax
06/88
02/90
Independent Nail Co.
Beaufort
09/83
09/84
Kalama Specialty Chemicals
Beaufort
09/83
09/84
Koppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Pint)
Charleston
02/92
09/84
Koppers Co., Inc. (Florence Plant)
Florence
09/83
Leonard Chemicel Co., Inc.
Rock Hill
09/83
09/84
Lexington County Landfill Area
Ceyce
06/88
10/89
Medley Farm Drum Dutp
Gaffney
06/86
03/89
Palmetto Recycling, Inc.
Coliafeia
09/83
09/84
Palmetto Wood Preserving
Dixiana
09/83
09/84
Para-Chem Southern, Inc.
Siipsonville
10/89
08/90
Rochester Property
Travelers Rest
06/86
10/89
Rock Hill Chemical Co.
Rock Hill
06/88
02/90
SCROI Bluff Road
Columbia
10/81
09/83
SCROI Dixiana
Cayce
07/82
09/83
Sangano Weston/Twelve-Nile/Hartwell PCB
Pickens
01/87
02/90
Towneend Sew Chain Co.
Pontiac
06/88
02/90
Wamchem, Inc.
Burton
09/83
09/84
Federel Facility Sites
Savannah River Site (US00E)
Aiken
07/89
11/89
23 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites « 24
25
-------
St
Site Mam
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sftes
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
Site Mam
Location
Proposed3
Final
Not
General Superfund Sites
Midvale Slag
Midvale
06/86
02/91
Honticello Radioactive Contaminated Prop
Honticello
10/84
06/86
Petrochem Recycling Corp./Elcotek Plant
Salt Lake City
07/91
10/92
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust 2 1 3)
Salt Lake City
10/84
06/86
Richardson Flat Tailings
Sunait County
02/92
Rose Park Sludge Pit
Salt Lake City
10/81
09/83
S
Sharon Steel Corp. (Midvale Tailings)
Hidvale
10/84
08/90
Utah Power I Light/American Barrel Co.
Salt Lake City
05/89
10/89
Wasatch Chemical Co. (Lot 6)
Salt Lake City
01/87
02/91
Federal Facility Sites
Hill Air Force Base
Ogden
10/84
07/87
F
Honticello Hill Tailings (USOOE)
Honticello
07/89
11/89
F
Ogden Defense Depot
Ogden
10/84
07/87
F
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
Tooele
10/84
08/90
F
UT
VA
VI
9 General Superfund Sites ~ 4 Federal Facility Sites » 13
Abe* Corp.
Portsmouth
06/88
08/90
Arrowhead Associates/Scovi11 Corp.
Montross
06/88
02/90
Atlantic Wood Industries, Inc.
Portsmouth
06/86
02/90
Avtex Fibers, Inc.
Front Royal
t0/84
06/66
Buckingham County Landfill
Buckingham
04/85
10/89
C 1 R Battery Co., Inc.
Chesterfield County
01/87
07/87
Chisman Creek
York County
10/81
09/83
Culpeper Wood Preservers, Inc.
Culpepar
10/84
10/89
Dixie Caverns County Landfill
Salem
01/87
10/89
First Plednont Rock Quarry (Route 719)
Pittsylvania County
04/85
07/87
Greenwood Chemical Co.
Newtown
01/87
07/87
Hi H Inc., Burn Pit
Farringten
01/87
03/89
L.A. Clarke I Son
Spotsylvania County
10/84
06/86
Rentokil, Inc. (VA Wood Preserving Div)
Richmond
01/87
03/89
Rhinehart Tire Fire Dinp
Frederick County
10/84
06/86
Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds
saltville
12/82
09/83
Saunders Supply Co.
Chuckatuck
01/87
10/89
Suffolk City Landfill
Suffolk
06/88
02/90
U.S. Titan it*
Piney River
12/82
09/83
Federal Facility Sites
Defense General Supply Center
Chesterfield County
10/84
07/87
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Hampton
05/93
Marine Corps Combat Development Co—and
Quantico
05/93
10/92
Naval Surface Warfare - Oahlgren
Dahlgren
02/92
Naval Weapona Station - Yorktown
Yorktown
02/92
10/92
19 General Superfund Sites ~ 5 Federal Facility Sites » 24
General Superfund Sites
Tutu Wellfield
Tutu
02/92.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites « 1
VT General Superfind Site*
BFI Sanitary landfill(Rockingham)
Bennington Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Burgess Brothers Landfill
Darling Hill Di*p
Old Springfield Landfill
Parker Sanitary Landfill
Pin* Street Canal
Tansitor Electronics, Inc.
8 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites
WA General Superfund Sites
ALCOA (Vancouver Smelter)
Rockingham
Bennington
Woodford
Lyndon
Springfield
Lyndon
Burlington
Bennington
Vancouver
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
12/82
06/88
10/81
06/88
06/88
10/89
03/89
03/89
10/89
09/83
02/90
09/83
10/89
02/90
27
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Name Location Proposed3 Final Notes*
American Crossam & Conduit Co.
Chehalis
06/88
10/89
American Lake Gardens
Tacoma
09/83
09/84
Centralis Municipal Landfill
Centralia
06/88
08/90
Colbert Landfill
Colbert
12/82
09/83
Commencement Bay, Near Shore/Tide Flats
Pierce County
10/81
09/83
Commencement Bay, South Tacoma Channel
Tacoma
10/81
09/83
FHC Corp. (Yakima Pit)
Yakima
12/82
09/83
Frontier Hard Chrome, Inc.
Vancouver
12/82
09/83
General Electric(Spokane Shop)
Spokane
06/88
10/89
Greenacres Landfill
Spokane County
09/83
09/84
Harbor Island (Lead)
Seattle
12/82
09/83
Hidden Valley Landfill (Thun Field)
Pierce County
06/86
03/89
Kaiser Aluninun Head Works
Mead
12/82
09/83
Lakewood Site
Lakewood
12/82
09/83
Mica Landfi11
Mica
10/84
06/86
Midway Landfill
Kent
10/84
06/86
Moses Lake Wellfield Contamination
Moses Lake
07/91
10/92
North Market Street
Spokane
06/88
08/90
Northside Landfill
Spokane
10/84
06/86
Northwest Transformer
Everson
10/84
06/86
Northwest Transformer(South Harkness St)
Everson
06/88
02/90
Old Inland Pit
Spokane
06/86
02/90
Pacific Car & Foundry Co.
Renton
06/88
02/90
Pacific Sound Resources
Seattle
05/93
Pasco Sanitary Landfill
Pasco
06/88
02/90
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Yakima
12/82
09/83
Queen City Farms
Maple Valley
09/83
09/84
Seattle Municipal Landfill (Kent Hghlnds
Kent
06/88
08/90
Silver Mountain Mine
Locmis
10/84
06/86
Spokane Junkyard and Associated Prop
Spokane County
10/92
Tulalip Landfill
MarysviIle
07/91
Vancouver Water Station #4 Contamination
Vancouver
07/91
10/92
Western Processing Co., Inc.
Kent
07/82
09/83
Wyckoff Co./Eagle Harbor
Bainbridge Island
09/85
07/87
Yakima Plating Co.
Yakima
06/88
03/89
Federal FaciIity Sites
Bangor Naval Submarine Base
SiIverdale
07/89
08/90
Bangor Ordnance Disposal
Bremerton
10/84
07/87
Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USOOE)
Vancouver
07/89
11/89
Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
Spokane County
06/88
03/89
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Tacoma
10/84
07/87
Fort Lewis Logistics Center
Tiilicua
07/89
11/89
Hamilton Island LandfiIKUSA/COE)
North Bonneville
07/91
10/92
Hanford 100-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
Hanford 1100-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
Hanford 200-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
Hanford 300-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
Tacoaia
10/84
07/87
Naval Air Station, WMdbey Is (Seaplane)
WMdbey Island
09/85
02/90
Naval Air Station, WMdbey Island (Ault)
WMcfcey Island
09/85
02/90
Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
Keyport
06/86
10/89
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
Bremerton
05/93
36 General Superfund Sites ~ 16 Federal Facility Sites
- 52
General Superfund Sites
Atgoma Municipal Landfill
Atgoma
06/86
07/87
Better Brite Plating Chrome t Zinc Shops
DePere
10/89
08/90
City Disposal Corp. Landfill
Dunn
09/83
09/84
Delavan Municipal Well #4
Delavan
09/83
09/84
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field
Eau Claire
09/83
09/84
Fadrowski Drun Disposal
Franklin
10/84
06/86
28
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May t993
Date
St
Sit# Na
Location
Proposed*
Final
Motes
Hagen Farm
Stoughton
09/85
07/87
Hechimovich Sanitary Landfill
Uit liana town
06/88
03/89
Hunts Disposal Landfill
Caledonia
06/86
07/87
Janesville Ash Beds
Janesville
09/83
09/84
Janesville Old Landfill
Janesville
09/83
09/84
Kohler Co. Landfill
Kohter
09/83
09/84
Lauer 1 Sanitary Landfill
Hencmonee Falls
09/83
09/84
Lemberger Landfill, Inc.
Utiitelaw
09/85
06/86
Lemberger Transport t Recycling
Franklin Township
09/83
09/84
Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District
Blooming Grove
06/88
02/90
Master Disposal Service Landfill
Brookfield
09/83
09/84
Mid-State Disposal, Inc. Landfill
Cleveland Township
09/83
09/84
Moss-American(Kerr-McGee OiI Co.)
Milwaukee
09/83
09/84
Muskego Sanitary Landfill
Muskego
09/83
09/84
H.U. Mauthe Co., Inc.
AppCeton
06/88
03/89
National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire
10/84
06/86
Northern Engraving Co.
Sparta
09/83
09/84
OconomoMoc Electroplating Co. Inc
Ashippin
09/83
09/84
Omega Hills North Landfill
Germantown
09/83
09/84
Onalaska Municipal Landfill
Onalaska
09/83
09/84
Refuse Hideaway Landfill
Middleton
02/92
10/92
Sauk County Landfill
Excelsior
06/88
10/89
Schmali Dump
Harrison
09/83
09/84
Scrap Processing Co., Inc.
Medford
09/83
09/84
Sheboygan Harbor 1 River
Sheboygan
09/85
06/86
Spickler Landfill
Spancar
01/87
07/87
Stoughton City Landfill
Stoughton
10/84
06/86
Tomah Armory
Tomah
01/87
07/87
Tomah Fairgrounds
Tomah
01/87
07/87
Tomah Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Tomah
06/66
03/89
Uaste Management (Brookfield Landfill)
8rookfield
06/88
08/90
Uausau Ground Water Contamination
Uausau
04/85
06/86
Wheeler Pit
La Prairie Township
09/83
09/84
39 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 39
WV General Superfund Sites
Fike Chemical, Inc. Nitro 12/82 09/83
Fo Hans bee Site Fotlansbaa 12/82 09/83
Leetoun Pesticide Leetown 12/82 09/83
Ordnance Uorks Disposal Areas Morgantowi 10/84 06/86
West Virginia Ordnance Point Pleasant 10/81 09/83
S General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites - 5
WY General Superfund Sites
Baxter/Union Pacific Tie Treating Laramie
Mystery Bridge Rd/U.S. Highway 20 EvansviUa
Federal Facility Site*
F.E. Uarren Air Force Base Cheyenne
2 General Superfund Sitas ~ 1 Federal Facility Sitas » 3
12/82
06/88
OT/89
09/83
08/90
02/90
1123 General Suparfund Sitae ~ 133 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 1256
29
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Nam Location Proposed3 Final Mot«»
aDate first eligible for Superfund action. First NPL proposed 12/82. Sone sites war* announced earlier in the
Interim Priorities List (10/81) and Expanded Eligibility List (7/82); most were included in the first proposed NPL
bA s Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
F => Federal facility site, not eligible for Superfund-financed response.
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
30
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free
1 •800-424*9346 or (703) 920-0810 in Washington, DC
metropolitan area, or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices
listed below.*
For publications, contact
Public Information Center, PM-211B
401 M Street. SW
Washington, DC 20460
202)260-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, OS-5204G
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(703) 603-8860
Reaion 1
Connecticut
New Hampshire
Maine
Rhode Island
Massachusetts Vermont
Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-t
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-2211
(617) 573-5707
Reaion 2
New Jersey
Puerto Rico
New York
Virgin Islands
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-8672
Region 3
Delaware
Pennsylvania
District of Columbia Virginia
Maryland
West Virginia
Site Assessment Section, 3HW73
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215)597-8229
Region 4
Alabama
Mississippi
Florida
North Carolina
Georgia
South CaroHna
Kentucky
Tennessee
"Waste* Management "Division
345 Courtland Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404) 347-5065
Reolon 5
NHnois
Minnesota
Indiana
Ohio
Michigan
Wisconsin
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago. 1L 60604
(312)353.9419
Region 6
Arkansas
Oklahoma
Louisiana
Texas
New Mexico
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214) 655-6740
Reaion 7
Iowa
Missouri
Kansas
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913) 551-7062 or 551-7595
Region 8
Colorado
South Dakota
Montana
Utah
North Dakota Wyoming
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
(303)294-7630
Region 9
American samoa Guam Northern Marianas
Arizona
Hawaii Trust Territories
California
Nevada ....
Waste Management Division, H-l
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415)744-1730
Region 10
Alaska
Oregon
Idaho
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division. HW-l 13
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1677
* All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
accessed via the Federal Telecommunications System IFTS).
-------
NPL- OH- 6-2
United States Office of Publication 9320.7-05
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and May 1993
Agency Emergency Response
wERA Supplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Intermittent Bulletin
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (OS-5204G) Volume 3, Number 1
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to human health or the environment. Such- sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
extended to September 30, 1994. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (April 1993) 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Removing Proposed Site 7
Lists and Data Summaries 8
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 9
Proposed Sites (by State) 14
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 17
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) 22
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 23
Federal Register Notices 25
-------
primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
program.
HOW SITES ABE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was bssed on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, aa required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as tbe original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA snd die
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drop* the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, snd adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States an
-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances — petroleum, for example — from the
definition of 'release." In addition, as a matter of
policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws.
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of theee policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Fedsrel RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that farflitias subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on die
NPL if one or mora of these conditions exists:
* Hie facilities are owned by persons who
have demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
• The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake
corrective action.
• The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-
by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
• Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and
have littls or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believe* that these non- or
lote film, although they are technically
subject to RCRA, are not likely to be
cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and
so should be on the NPL. However, if such
facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA
may consider whether listing is necessary.
• Facilities with permits for die treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whoee owners/operators will not
voluntarily modify the permit. Pre-HSWA
permittees are not required to take corrective
action for releases. Under RCRA Section
3004
-------
NPL Status (May 1993)
Sites on final NPL
• General Superfund Section
(1,079)
• Federal Facilities Section
(123)
1,202
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
1,256
• General Superfund Section
(44)
• Federal Facilities Section
(10)
54
Construction Completion List
161 *
States dropped from proposed NPL
• Policy issues (e.g., RCRA)
(43)
• HRS score below 28.50
(33)
76
•All but 1 in General Superfund Section
• Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only. Such facilities - for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste - are not subject to Subtitle C
corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
• Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazaidoua waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Pait A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on die NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the —«ne t"1"* as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(eX3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial action,
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal »i^
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRa-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal Abilities. As a result, oq
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements - e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater — even if the Federal facility also is
4
-------
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Geranp, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sitae under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
• Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
• Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
• Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Fedenl government cleanup efforts.
• Listing these sites helps Federal agencies Bet
priorities and focus cleanup efforts cm those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore
not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the
NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
incident if these releases sie subject to financial
protection requirements under Section 170 of the
Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from any
processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also cboesn not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has ftill authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
will, however, list releasee from facilities that bold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of die Atomic Energy Act Facilities
whose lirfinsna are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may
be deleted where no further response is appropriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria hss
been met:
• EPA, in conjunction with the State, hss
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
• EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
finaaced response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
• A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or die environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from the NPL:
• The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report* which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
• The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.
• EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and in a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment period is provided.
• EPA responds to the comments and, if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites thst hsve been deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial
action in the unlikely event that conditions in the
future warrant such action.
As of May 1993, 49 sites have been deleted from
the NPL, all in the General Superfund Section.
5
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
• CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
• CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
• Revised July 16,1982 (47FR 311801 to incorporate CERCLA requirements
• Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in responseto CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
• Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180} as Appendix A of the NCP
• Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
• Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix 8 of the NCP
• Must be updated at least annually
• Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11,1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
• First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
• First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR
47181)
e Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)
6
-------
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of May 1993* 79 tiles (see page 13) have been
proposed for the NFL but subsequently removed from
further consideration, mo«t of them because their
filial HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites
were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
8
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final arid Proposed Sites (by State)
Kay 1993
Date
St Site Nome City/County Proposed Final
AK
Adak Naval Air Station
Adak
10/92
AK
Eielson Air Fore* Base
Fairbanks N Star
Bor
07/89
11/89
AK
Elmendorf Air Force Bast
Greater Anchorage Bo
07/89
08/90
AK
Fort Uainwright
Fairbanks N Star
Bor
07/89
08/90
AK
Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(llSDOT
Anchorage
07/89
08/90
4 Final ~ 1 Proposed = 5
AL
Alabama Army A/munition Plant
Childersburg
10/84
07/87
AL
Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
Anniston
10/84
03/89
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
AZ
Luke Air Force Base
Glendale
07/89
08/90
AZ
Williams Air Force Base
Chandler
07/89
11/89
AZ
Yum Marine Corps Air Station
Yuma
06/88
02/90
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CA
Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
Barstow
07/89
11/89
CA
Carp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
San Diego County
07/89
11/89
CA
Castle Air Force Base
Merced
10/84
07/87
CA
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Concord
02/92
CA
Edwards Air Force Base
Kern County
07/89
08/90
CA
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
El Toro
06/88
02/90
CA
Fort Ord
Marina
07/89
02/90
CA
George Air Force Base
Victorville
07/89
02/90
CA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Pasadena
02/92
10/92
CA
Laurence Livermore Laboratory (Site 300)
Livermore
07/89
08/90
CA
Laurence Livermore Laboratory (USOOE)
L i vermore
10/84
07/87
CA
March Air Force Base
Riverside
07/89
11/89
CA
Mather Air Force Base
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
McCleltan Air Force Base (GU Contain)
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
Moffett Naval Air Station
Sunnyvale
04/85
07/87
CA
Norton Air Force Base
San Bernardino
10/84
07/87
CA
Riverbank Army Aimunition Plant
R i verbank
06/88
02/90
CA
Sacramento Army Depot
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
Sharpe Army Depot
Lathrop
10/84
07/87
CA
Tracy Defense Depot
Tracy
07/89
08/90
CA
Travis Air Force Base
Solano County
07/89
11/89
CA
Treasure Island Naval Stat ion-Hun Pt An
San Francisco
07/89
11/89
21 Final + 1 Proposed * 22
CO
Air Force Plant PJKS
Uaterton
07/89
11/89
CO
Rocky Flats Plant (US00E)
Golden
10/84
10/89
CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
Ada— County
10/84
07/87
3 Final * 0 Proposed » 3
CT
New London Submarine Base
New London
10/89
08/90
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦ 1
DE
Dover Air Force Base
Dover
10/84
03/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦ 1
FL
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Jacksonville
07/89
11/89
FL
Homestead Air Force Base
Homestead
07/89
08/90
Fl
Jacksonville Naval Air Station
Jacksonville
07/89
11/89
FL
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Pensacola
07/89
11/89
4 Final + 0 Proposed * 4
9
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
Hay 1993
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final ~ 0 Proposed « 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦ 1
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
Hi Schofield Barracks
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Lab (USDOE)
10 Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final * 0 Proposed - 2
1L Joliet Army Ammunition plant (LAP Area)
1L Joliet Army Amnnition Plant (Mfg Area)
1L Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NUR (USDOI
1L Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final * 0 Proposed ¦ 4
ICS Fort Riley
1 Final + 0 Proposed ¦ 1
KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
0 Final + 1 Proposed ¦ 1
LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1
HA Fort Devens
HA Fort Oevens-Sudbury Training Annex
MA Nanscon Air Force Base
HA Matick Laboratory Army Research, DJ£ Cntr
HA Otis Air National Guard /Camp Edwards
3 Final + 2 Proposed * 5
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
HO Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF
NO Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
2 Final ~ 1 Proposed * 3
HE Brunswick Naval Air Station
HE Loring Air Force Base
2 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 2
MN Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
Albany
Houston County
Tigo
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Middtetown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Hone
Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Sevama
Junction City
Paducah
Ooyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Jtatick
Falmouth
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Brunswick
Limestone
Fridley
07/89 11/89
10/84 07/87
02/92 10/92
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
05/93
05/93
07/89
04/85
04/85
05/93
10/84
07/89
10/92
08/90
07/89 08/90
n/89
08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
07/89 08/90
05/93
10/84 03/89
11/89
02/90
11/89
02/90
10/89
07/87
02/90
07/89 lt/89
10
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
Date
St Site Name City/County Proposed Final
HN
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
Minneapolis
01/87
07/87
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
NO
Lake City Army Amnu. Plant (NW Lagoon)
Independence
10/84
07/87
MO
Ueldon Spring Former Army Ortfrvance Works
St.Charles County
10/84
07/87
NO
Weldon Spring Ouarry/Plant/Pitts(USD06)
St. Charles County
07/89
02/90
3 Final * 0 Proposed » 3
NC
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
Onslow County
06/88
10/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed » 1
NE
Cornhusker Arm/ Ammunition Plant
Hall County
10/84
07/87
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
NH
Pease Air Force Base
Portsmouth/Newington
07/89
02/90
1 Final +0 Proposed = 1
NJ
Federal Aviation Adnin. Tech. Cntr(USDOT
Atlantic County
07/89
08/90
NJ
Fort Dix (Landfill Site)
Pemberton Township
10/84
07/87
NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center
Lakehurst
09/85
07/87
NJ
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Colts Neck
10/84
08/90
NJ
Picatirmy Arsenal
Rockaway Township
07/89
02/90
NJ
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USDOE)
Wayne Township
09/83
09/84
6 Final * 0 Proposed ¦ 6
NM
Cal West Metals (USSBA)
Lemitar
06/88
03/89
NM
Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
Farmington
06/88
08/90
2 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 2
NY
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
Upton
07/89
11/89
NY
Griffiss Air Force Base
Rome
10/84
07/87
NY
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Plattsburgh
07/89
11/89
NY
Seneca Army Depot
Romulus
07/89
08/90
4 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 4
OH
Feed Material* Production Canter (USDOE)
Fernald
07/89
11/89
OH
Mound Plant (USDOE)
Miamisburg
07/89
11/89
OH
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton
06/88
10/89
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed » 3
OK
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
Oklahoma City
04/85
07/87
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦ 1
OR
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
Hermiston
10/84
07/87
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 1
PA
Letterketwy Army Depot (POO Ares)
Franklin County
04/85
03/89
PA
Letterkemy Army Depot (SE Area)
Chambersburg
10/84
07/87
PA
Naval Afr Development Center(8 Areas)
Warminster Township
06/86
10/89
PA
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Tobyhanna
07/89
08/90
4 Final ~ 0 Proposed » 4
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
Hay 1993
Date
St Sit# Nam City/County Proposed Final
PR
Mavai Security Group Activity
Sabana Seca
06/88
10/89
1 Final +- 0 Proposed * 1
R1
Davisvitle Naval Construction Batt Cent
North Kingstown
07/89
11/89
R1
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
Newport
07/89
11/89
2 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 2
SC
Savamah River Site (USOOE >
Aiken
07/B9
11/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦ 1
SO
Etlsvorth Air Force Base
Rapid City
10/89
08/90
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = T
TN
Memphis Defense Depot
Memphis
02/92
10/92
TN
Milan Army Ammunition Plant
Mi lan
10/84
07/87
TN
Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
Oak Ridge
07/89
11/89
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed * 3
TX
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Fort Worth
10/84
08/90
TX
Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
Texarkana
10/84
07/87
TX
tonghorn Army Ammunition Plant
Karnack
07/89
08/90
TX
Pantex Plant (USD06)
Parte* Villaga
07/91
3 Final ~ 1 Proposed » 4
UT
Hill Air Force Base
Ogden
J0/84
Q7/S7
UT
Monticello Mill Tailings (USOOE)
Montieello
07/89
11/89
UT
Ogden Defense Depot
Ogden
10/84
07/87
UT
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
Tooele
10/84
08/90
4 Final + 0 Proposed * 4
VA
Defense General Supply Center
Chesterfield County
10/84
07/87
VA
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Hampton
05/93
VA
Marina Corps Combat Development Command
Ouantico
05/93
VA
Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
Dahlgren
02/92
10/92
VA
Naval Ueapons Station • Torktown
Yorktown
02/92
10/92
3 Final * 2 Proposed * 5
UA
Bangor Naval Sutxnarine Base
Silverdale
or/89
08/90
UA
Bangor Orcbanee Disposal
Bremerton
10/84
07/87
UA
Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USOOE)
Vancouver
07/89
11/89
UA
Fairchild Air Force Bass (4 Waste Areas)
Spokane Cotnty
06/88
03/89
UA
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Tacoma
10/84
07/87
UA
Fort Lewis Logistics Center
Tillicua
07/89
11/89
UA
Hamilton Island L*idfill(USA/CC6)
North BomavilU
07/91
10/92
UA
Hertford 100-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
UA
Hanford 1100-Area (USOOE)
Banton Cotnty
06/88
10/89
UA
Hanford 200-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
UA
Hanford 300-Area (USOOE)
Banton County
06/88
10/89
UA
HeChord Air Force Base (Uash Rack/Treat)
Tacoma
(0/84
07/87
UA
Naval Air Station, Uhidsay ts (Seaplane)
Uhidbey Island
09/85
02/90
UA
Naval Air Station, Uhidbey island (Ault)
Uhidbey Island
09/85
02/90
UA
Naval Undersea Uarfare Station (4 Areas)
Keyport
06/86
10/89
UA
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
Bremerton
05/93
15 Final ~ 1 Proposed » 16
12
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
May 1993
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
Cheyenne
07/89 02/90
St Site Na
UY F.E. Uarren Air Force Bate
1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1
123 Final ~ 10 Proposed * 133
1 7
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
May 1993
St
Sit* Ma
Location
Notes"
AK Federal Facility Sites
Adak Naval Air Station
0 General Superfund Sites * I Federal Facility Sites » 1
AL General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites +• 0 Federal Facility Sites 3 1
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Orun Co.
Del Am Facility
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
Federal Facility Sites
Concord Naval Weapons Station
4 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 5
CQ
Fl
HI
1A
ID
IN
KY
MA
MD
General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. {Globe Plant)
Smeltertown Site
Sunmitvi lie Mine
3 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites 3 3
General Superfund Sites
Broward County--21st Manor Dimp
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpon* Spring*)
4 General Superftnd Sites +¦ 0 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 4
General Superfund Sites
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1
General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triunph Mine Tailing* Piles
2 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites * 2
General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smlter t Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Siperfund Site* ~ 0 Federal Facility Site* * 1
General Superfind Site*
National Southwire Aluainu* Co.
Federal Facility Site*
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOC)
1 General Suparfund Site* ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites > 2
General Superfund Site*
Blackburn t Union Privileges
Federal Facility Sites
Hanscom Air Force Base
Natick Laboratory Amy Research,D*£ Cntr
1 General Superfund Sites * 2 Federal Facility Sites * 3
General Superfund Site*
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Adak
Florence
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Iimperial
Concord
Denver
Salida
Rio Grande County
Fort Lauderdale
DeLand
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Honolulu County
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triinph
East Chicago
Hauesville
Paducah
Valpole
Bedford
Natick
Cecil County
14
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
May 1993
St
Sit# Ha
Location
Notes
Spectron, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
BeltsvUte Agricultural fleseareh (USDA)
2 General Sqserfurid Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 3
Ktt General Superfund Sites
Lake Elmo Airport /GU Ccntaniination
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =¦ 1
MS General Superfund Sites
Potter Co.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
MC General Superfund Sites
General Electric Co/Shepherd Farm
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal facility Sites = 1
HE General Superfund Sites
American Shizuki/Ogallata Electronics Co
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 2
MJ General Superfund Sites
Horseshoe Road
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 1
KM General Super fird Sites
ATtSF (Albuquerque)
ftineheM Co., Inc.
1 General Super find Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sitae ¦ 2
NY Central Superfund Sites
Onondaga Lake
Pfohl Brothers Landfill
2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites * 2
OH General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shawock Corp.{Painesvilie Work)
Dover Chemical Corp.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 2
OK General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
OR General Superfind Sites
East HultnoMh County Ground Wtr Con tan.
1 General Siperfmd Site* + 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
SC General Stjwfund Sites
Koppera Co., Inc. (Charleston Pint)
1 General Superfund Sitas + 0 Federal Facility Sites ¦ 1
SO General Stperfwd Site*
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Superfind Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
TN General Syperfund Site*
ICG I set in Railroad Tard
1 General Superfund Sites -» 0 federal Facility sites * 1
TX General Superfund Sites
RSR Corp.
Cecil Cotatty
Beltsvilla
Baytown Township
Wesson
East Flat Rock
Ogallata
Bruno
Sayrevilie
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Syracuse
Cheektouaga
Painesvi He
Dower
Bartlesvilie
Hultnoawh Cocnty
Charleston
teed
Jackson
Dallas
15
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
May 1993
St
Sita Man*
Location
Notes1
Federal Facility Sites
Pantex Plant (USDOE)
1 General sijperfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites * 2
Pantex Village
UT
General Superfund Sites
Richardson Flat Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites +• 0 Federal Facility Sites » 1
Sumrit County
VA
Federal Facility Sites
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Commend
0 General Superfund Sites *¦ 2 Federal Facility Sites 3 2
Hampton
Quantico
VI
General Superfund Sites
Tutu Wellfield
1 General Superfund Sites «• 0 Federal Facility Sites * 1
Tutu
UA
General Superfund Sites
Pacific Sound Resources
Spokane Junkyard and Associated Prop
Tulalip Landfill
Federal Facility Sites
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
3 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites » 4
44 General Superfund Sites * TO Federal Facility Sites * 54
Seattle
Spokane County
Harysvi tie
Bremerton
A » Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S 3 state top priority
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
May 1993
Data
Removed
St
Site Name
Location
Proposed
Score"
0therb
AR
Allen Transformer
Ft. Saith
10/23/81
47F* 58476
12/30/82c
AR
Crittenden County landfill
Marion
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/08/83
47FR 40658
AR
Magnolia City Landfill
Magnolia
10/26/89
54FR 43778
08/30/90
55FR 35502
AZ
Kingman Airport Industrial Area
Kingman
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/21/84d
49FR 37070
AZ
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
Mesa
6/10/86
51FR 21099
02/08/91
56FR 5598
CA
FMC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
Fresno
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Hewlett-Packard
Palo Alto
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
IBM Corp. (San Josa Plant)
San Jose
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
Font ana
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Kearney-KPF
Stockton
6/24/88
53FR 23988
08/30/90
53FR 35502
CA
Marley Cooling Tower Co.
Stockton
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Precision Monolithic, Inc.
Santa Clara
10/15/84
49FR 40320
06/10/86
51FR 21054
CA
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp.
East Palo Alto
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Signetics, Inc.
Sunnyvale
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Solvent Service, Inc.
San Jose
6/24/88
53FR 23988
08/30/90
55FR 35502
CA
Southern Pacific Transportation
Rosevilie
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Van uatcrs I Rogera, Inc.
San Jose
10/1S/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CO
Kartfn-Marietta(Denver Aerospace)
waterton
9/18/8$
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
DC
USA Fort Lincoln Barrel site
Washington
10/23/81
12/30/82*
47FR 58476
06
Old Brine Sludge Landfill
Delaware City
9/08/83
48FR 40674
09/24/84
49FR 37070
17
-------
Proposed Sites Removed Fron Consideration for HPL
May T993
Date
Removed " —'
St
Site None
Location
Proposed
Score*
Other^
DE
Pigeon Point Landfill
New Castle
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/04/89
54FR 41015
FL
Davidson lumber Co.
South Miami
10/15/84
49FR 40320
06/10/86
51FR 21054
FL
Hontco Research Product*, Inc.
Hoilister
10/15/84
49FR 40320
03/31/89
54FR 13296
FL
Pratt t Whitney Air/United Tech
West Pain Beach
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54F* 4l00d
GA
01 in Corp. (Areas 1,2 ft 4)
Augusta
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/0^/89
54F* 4100(1
HI
Kunia Wells I
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/9-,f
56* 559a
HI
Kunia Wells 11
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/9!*
56F" 5598
HI
Mililani Wells
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/9*'
55%
HI
Waiawa Shaft
Oahu
10/15/84
49F8 40320
02/08/91*
56F« 5598
HI
Watpahu Wei la
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
08/91*
*'*55%
Ml
Waipio Heights Wells 11
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
^08/91f
56F* 5598
[A
A.T. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Dubuque
9/18/85
50FR 37950
I/rCK/'®9
54f* *1000
IA
Cherrplex Co.
Clinton/Camanche
10/15/84
49FR 40320
56F* 5598
1A
Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
Huitaoldt
4/10/85
50FR 14115
10/04/89
41000
IA
John Deere (Dubuque Works)
Dubuque
9/18/85
50FR 37950
™'<*/B9
5*F* Hood
EA
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Mcxnt Vernon
10/15/84
49FR 40320
JO/04/89
54F* <100C
ID
Flynr Lurrtoer Co.
Caldwell
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/08/83
48FR 40658
R
Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
Sheffield
10/15/84
49FR 40320
S4^/8*
4F*
-------
Proposed Sites Removed Fran Consideration for NPL
May 1993
Data
St Site Name
location
Proposed Score
oved
Other
IN Firestone Industrial Products Co.
IN Mccarty's Bald Knob Landfill
IN Parrot Road Dimp
KS National Industrial Environ Serv
MI E.I. du Pont (Montague Plant)
MI Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
MI Hooker (Montague Plant)
MI Lacks Industries, Inc.
MI Lenawee Disposal Service, Inc. Landfill
MI Littlefield Township Dump
MO Findett Corp.
MO Quail Run Mobile Manor
MS Gautier Oil Co., Inc.
MS Plastifax, Inc.
NT Burlington Northern(Somers Plant)
MT Comet Oil Co.
NE Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
N€ Phillips Chemical Co.
NJ Horstmom's Duap
NJ Jam Fine Chemical
Noblesvilie
Mt. Vernon
New Haven
Furley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapida
Adrian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Sumrit
Gautier
Gulfport
Somers
Billings
Coxad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
9/18/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/1B/S5
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41015
09/08/83
4AFR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
S1FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
5FR 35502
09/08/83h
48FR 40658
02/08/91
56FR 5598
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/10/86*
51FR 21054
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
02/08/919
56FR 5598
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
19
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for MPL
May 1993
Date
St Site Nam
Removed
Location
Proposed Score
Other
NJ Mat tack. Inc.
OH General Electric(Coshocton Plant)
OK Kerr-McGee Corp. (Cushing Plant)
OK Sunray Oil Co. Refinery
PA Keyser Avenue Borehole
PA Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
TX Pig Road
TX Rio Grande Oil Co. Refinery
UT Mayflower Mountain Tailings Pond
UT Olson/Neihart Reservoir
UT Silver Creek Tailings
VA IBM Corp. (Manassas Plant Spill)
UA Quendall Terminal
UA Rosch Property
Wl Fort Howard Paper Co. Lagoons
wv Mobay Chemical (New Martinsville)
Woolwich Township
Coshocton
Cush i ng
Allen
Scranton
Bristol Township
New Uaverty
Sour Lake
Wasatch County
Wasatch County
Park City
Manassas
Renton
Roy
Green Bay
New MartinsviIle
9/18/85
50 FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/26/89
54FR 43778
6/24/83
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91
56FR 5598
08/30/90
55FR 35502
02/21/90
55FR 6154
06/10/86
51FR 21054
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
53FR 35502
10/04/89
S4FR 4100"
10/04/39
4loo1'
10/04/89
4100(1
1°/1?/86j
10/O4/W
54F* AlOOf
10/04/8©
54F* 41000
Muifcer of sites removed: 76
bFinal HRS score below 28.50.
Subject to RCRA Subtitle C, except as noted.
d0n Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981;
Contamination occurs naturally
(Footnotes continue on the next page.)
removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 19^5
20
-------
Proposed Sites Removed Fran Consideration for NPL
Kay 1993
Oate
Rtmnved
St Site Nam Location Proposed Score* Otherb
On Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, Oeceafeer 30, 1962),
fi Federal facility site an so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
hNo longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
•On Expanded Eligibility List announced July 23, 1982; rmmved at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476^ Decwber 30, 1982) twcaw
Removed per SARA Section 118(p)
NOTE: The following four sites were proposed, removed, and then reproposed. In this ease, the site has been listed:
• Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, ON, proposed December 30, 1982 (47FR 58476); removed September 8, 1983 (48FR
40658); reproposed October 15, 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
These three sites have been reproposed under the revised HRS:
• Concord Naval Weapons Station, Concord, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed August 30, 1990 (55FR
35502); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• G8F, Inc., Antioch, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015); reproposed
February 7, 1992 <57F* 4824).
• Richardson Flat Tailings, Sumrit County, UT: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed February 11, 1991
(56FR 5598); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
21
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Proposed Rule #14)
May 1993
Proposed Rule #14
Total Proposed
Total
Final
State/Territory
Gen
fed
Gen
Fed
Gen
Fed
Total
Colorado
2
0
3
0
13
3
19
Idaho
2
0
2
0
6
2
10
New York
2
0
2
0
79
4
85
Ohio
2
0
2
0
30
3
35
Maryland
1
J
2
1
7
2
12
Washington
1
1
3
1
33
15
52
Alabama
1
0
1
0
10
2
13
Florida
1
0
4
0
47
4
55
Hawaii
1
0
1
0
0
2
3
Mississippi
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
New Jersey
1
0
1
0
102
6
109
Oklahoma
1
0
1
0
9
1
11
Oregon
1
0
1
0
8
1
10
Tennessee
1
0
1
0
11
3
15
Texas
1
0
1
1
25
3
30
Massachusetts
0
2
1
2
22
3
28
Virginia
0
2
0
2
19
3
24
Kentucky
0
1
1
1
18
0
20
Alaska
0
0
0
1
2
4
7
American Samoa
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arizona
0
0
0
0
7
3
10
Arkansas
0
0
0
0
12
0
12
California
0
0
4
1
69
21
95
Commnwealth of Marianas
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Connecticut
0
0
0
0
14
1
15
Delaware
0
0
0
0
18
1
19
District of Cotunbia
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Georgia
0
0
0
0
11
2
13
Guam
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
Illinois
0
0
0
0
33
4
37
Indiana
0
0
1
0
32
0
33
Iowa
0
0
1
0
18
1
20
Kansas
0
0
0
0
9
1
10
Louisiana
0
0
0
0
11
1
12
Maine
0
0
0
0
7
2
9
Michigan
0
0
0
0
76
0
76
Minnesota
0
0
1
0
38
2
41
Missouri
0
0
0
0
20
3
23
Montana
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
Nebraska
0
0
2
0
7
1
10
Nevada
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
New Hanpshira
0
0
0
0
16
7
1
17
New Mexico
0
0
2
0
2
11
North Carolina
0
0
1
0
21
1
23
North Dakota
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
Pennsylvania
0
0
0
0
94
4
98
Puerto Rico
0
0
0
0
8
1
9
Rhode Island
0
0
0
0
10
2
12
South Carolina
0
0
1
0
22
1
24
South Dakota
0
0
1
0
2
1
4
Trust Territories
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Utah
0
0
1
0
8
4
13
Vermont
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
Virgin Islands
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
West Virginia
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
Wisconsin
0
0
0
0
39
0
39
Wyoming
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
Total
19
7
44
10
1079
123
1256
22
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
May 1993
Final Proposed
Reg State/Territory Gen Fed Gen Fed Total
Connect i cut
14
1
0
0
15
Massachusetts
22
3
1
2
28
Maine
7
2
0
0
9
New Hampshire
16
1
0
0
17
Rhode Island
10
2
0
0
12
Vermont
8
0
0
0
8
77
9
1
2
89
New Jersey
102
6
1
0
109
New York
79
4
2
0
85
Puerto Rico
8
1
0
0
9
Virgin Islands
0
0
1
0
1
189
11
4
0
204
District of Colunbia
0
0
0
0
0
Delaware
18
1
0
0
19
Maryland
7
2
2
1
12
Pennsylvania
94
4
0
0
98
Virginia
19
3
0
2
24
West Virginia
5
0
0
0
5
143
10
2
3
158
Alabama
10
2
1
0
13
Florida
47
4
4
0
55
Georgia
11
2
0
0
13
Kentucky
18
0
1
1
20
Mississippi
2
0
1
0
3
North Carolina
21
1
1
0
23
South Carolina
22
1
1
0
24
Tennessee
11
3
1
0
15
142
13
10
1
166
Illinois
33
4
0
0
37
Indiana
32
0
1
0
33
Michigan
76
0
0
0
76
Minnesota
38
2
1
0
41
Ohio
30
3
2
0
35
Wisconsin
39
0
0
0
39
248
9
4
0
261
Arkansas
12
0
0
0
12
Louisiana
11
1
0
0
12
New Mexico
7
2
2
0
11
Oklahoma
9
1
1
0
11
Texas
25
3
1
1
30
64
7
4
1
76
23
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
May 1993
Final Proposed
Reg State/Territory Gen Fed Gen Fed Total
10
Iowa
13
1
1
0
20
Kansas
9
1
0
0
10
Missouri
20
3
0
0
23
Nebraska
7
1
2
0
10
54
6
3
0
63
Colorado
13
3
3
0
19
Montana
8
0
0
0
8
North Dakota
2
0
0
0
2
South Dakota
2
1
1
0
4
Utah
8
4
1
0
13
Wyoming
2
1
0
0
3
35
9
5
0
49
Commonwealth of Marianas
0
0
0
0
0
American Samoa
0
0
0
0
0
Arizona
7
3
0
0
10
California
69
21
4
1
95
Guam
1
1
0
0
2
Havaii
0
2
1
0
3
Nevada
1
0
0
0
1
Trust Territories
0
0
0
0
0
78
27
5
1
111
Alaska
2
4
0
1
7
Idaho
6
2
2
0
10
Oregon
5
1
1
0
10
Washington
33
15
3
1
52
49
22
6
2
79
Total 1079 123 44 10 1256
24
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
Sites
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
October 23, 1981
11S ("Interim Priorities List")'
115
115
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
160
160
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
418
418
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
419
419
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
406
140
546
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
410
136
546
September 21,1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
538
4
542
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
538
248
786
February 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Oka Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, put of Proposed Rule #2)
540
246
786
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
540
278
818
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
.1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule 13)
541
277
818
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, inrlnrfiag 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
541
318
859
25
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (SI FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
703
185
June 10, 1986 (SI FR 21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 21, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rale #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
703
248a
802
149
888
951
951
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of site* from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14,1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule 09
7991
378
1,177
8903
273
1.163
890
283
1,173
889*
335
1.224
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
889
337
1.226
26
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
October 4,1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
Proposed sites dropped)
9813
213
1,194
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
981
238
1,219
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed
Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility
site)
1,010
209
1,219
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
1,081
137
1,218
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathom Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
1,082
136
1,218
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
1,187*
20
1,207
February 11,1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final nile under original HRS)
1,189s
0
1,189
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
1,188*
1
1,189
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rale under revised HRS)
1,188
23
1,211
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
1,185*
22
1,207
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Propoeed Rule #12)
1,183*
52
1,235
October 14, 1992 (57 FR. 47111)
33 (promulgation of sits* from Proposed Rules #11 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
1,208M
28
1,236
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
May 1993
26 (Propoeed Rule #14)
1.202*-4
26
1,256
'No Federal Register notice.
'Silver Creek Tailings, Paik City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
*Reflects aite(s) deleted since last role.
*Reflects site(s) removed since last rale.
27
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free
1 >800-424-9346 or (703) 920-9*10 in Washington, DC
metropolitan area, or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices
listed below.*
For publications, contact
Public Information Center, PM-211B
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 260-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, OS-5204G
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(703)603-8860
Realon 1
Connecticut
New Hampshire
Maine
Rhode Island
Massachusetts Vermont
Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-1
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-2211
(617) 573-5707
Reaion 2
New Jersey
Puerto Rico
New York
Virgin Islands
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
<212) 264-8672
Region 3
Delaware
Pennsylvania
District of Columbia Virginia
Maryland
West Virginia
Site Assessment Section, 3HW73
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215)597-8229
Region 4
Alabama
Mississippi
Florida
North Carolina
Georgia
South Carolina
Kentucky
Tennessee
Waste' Management Wvisiori
345 Court! and Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404) 347-5065
Realon 5
Illinois
Minnesota
Indiana
Ohio
Michigan
Wisconsin
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 3«-9419
Region 6
Arkansas Oklahoma
Louisiana Texas
New Mexico
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214) 655-6740
Reaion 7
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913) 551-7062 or 551<7595
Region 8
Colorado South Dakota
Montana Utah
North Dakota Wyoming
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver. CO 80202-2466
(303) 294.7630
Region 9
American bamoa Guam Northern Mariana
Arbona Hawaii Trust Territories
California Nevada
Waste Management Division. H-l
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 744-1730
Region 10
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1677
1 0
5k All FPA teteDtaone and telecommunications systems may fr*
SRederal Telecommunications System (FTS).
28
-------
HPL-L»4 - 6- 3
This document consists of descriptions of the 26 sites proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL) in May 1993.
The size of the site is generally indicated, based on information available at the time the site was scored using the Hazard
Ranking System. The size may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.
Sites are arranged alphabetically by State (two-letter abbreviations) and by site name.
United States Office of Publication 9320.7-071
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and May 1993
Agency Emergency Response
-------
REMEDIAL RESPONSES
The money for conducting a remedial response at
a hazardous waste site (and a removal action, as well)
can come from several sources:
• The individuals or companies responsible for the
problems can clean up voluntarily with EPA or
State supervision, or they can be forced to clean
up by Federal or State legal action.
• A State or local government can choose to
assume the responsibility to clean up without
Federal dollars.
• Superfund can pay for the cleanup, then seek to
recover the costs from the responsible party or
parties.
A remedial response, as defined by the National
Contingency Plan (the Federal regulation by which
Superfund is implemented), is an orderly process that
generally involves the following steps:
¦ Take any measures needed to stabilize conditions,
which might involve, for example, fencing the
site or removing above-ground drums or bulk
tanks.
• Undertake initial planning activities to scope out
a strategy for collecting information and analyzing
alternative cleanup approaches.
• Conduct a remedial investigation to characterize
the type and extent of contamination at the site
and to assess the risks posed by that
contamination.
• Conduct a feasibility study to analyze various
cleanup alternatives. The feasibility study is often
conducted concurrently with the remedial
investigation as ooe project. Typically, the two
together take from 18 to 24 months to complete
and cost approximately $1.3 million.
• Select the cleanup alternative that:
- Protects human health and the environment;
— Complies with Federal and State
requirements that are applicable or relevant
and appropriate;
— Uses permanent solutions and alternative
treatment technologies or resource recovery
technology to the maximum extent
practicable;
— Considers views of the State and public; and
— Is "cost effective" — that is, affords results
proportional to the costs of the remedy.
¦ Design the remedy. Typically, the design phase
takes 6 to 12 months to complete and costs
approximately $1.5 million.
* Implement the remedy, which might involve, for
example, constructing facilities to treat ground
water or removing contaminants to a safe disposal
area away from the site.
EPA expects the implementation (remedial action)
phase to average out at about S25 million (plus any costs
to operate and maintain the action) per site, and some
remedial actions may lake several years lo complete.
The State government can participate in a
remedial response under Superfund in one of two ways:
* The State can take the lead role under a
cooperative agreement, which is much like a
grant in that Federal dollars are transferred to the
State. The State then develops a workplan,
schedule, and budget, contracts for any services
it needs, and is responsible for making sure that
all the conditions in the cooperative agreement are
met. In contrast to a grant, EPA continues to be
substantially involved and monitors the State's
progress throughout the project.
* EPA can take the lead under a Superfund State
Contract, with the State's role outlined. EPA,
generally using contractor support, manages work
early in the planning process. In the later design
and implementation phases, contractors do the
work undo- the supervision of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. Under both arrangements,
the State must share in the cost of the
implementation phase of cleanup.
CERCLA requires that EPA select the remedy.
2
-------
SEPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
MONARCH TILE MANUFACTURING, INC.
Florence, Alabama
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc., produces ceramic tiles and glazes, and is located at the intersection of Rickwood
Street and Helton Drive in Florence, Lauderdale County, Alabama. The area is primarily industrial with Seaboard
Railroad tracks to the west, and a bus company maintenance facility to the south.
Stylon Corp. operated the facility from 1954 until 1973, when the company went bankrupt. Monarch then leased
the property from the city of Florence with an option to buy. The company purchased the property in 1988. No
previous industrial activity or disposal took place at the site prior to 1954.
In their operations, both Monarch and Stylon used zinc contaminated with lead, barium, and cadmium as colorants.
Starting in 1960, these hazardous wastes, along with other liquid wastes, were routed to a separator. The liquids
from the separator went to settling ponds, with any excess liquid draining into ditches that run south of the facility.
In 1976, Monarch began discharging the liquids from settling ponds to the Florence Sewer System, with the City's
permission. Solids from the separator were taken to a municipal landfill until 1980, when Monarch constructed an
onsite disposal trench. In March 1989, Monarch resumed sending the solids to a municipal landfill.
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) found barium, nickel, lead, and zinc in
composite samples of sediment collected from the settling ponds in August 1989. In October 1990, ADEM also
found zinc, cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, and barium in sediment samples from the northern drainage pathway
to Cox Creek, zinc in Cox Creek, and barium and zinc in an unnamed tributary of Sweetwater Creek.
Surface water within 15 miles downstream of the site includes the unnamed tributary, Cox Creek, Sweetwater
Creek, Cypress Creek, and the Pickwick Lake segment of the Tennessee River. The site is located approximately
3 miles north of Pickwick Lake and approximately 2 miles east of Cypress Creek.
The Florence Water Department supplies drinking water to an estimated 63,000 people from an intake located where
Cox Creek and Cypress Creek meet. The Sheffield Water Department has an intake on the Tennessee River that
serves 14,100 people. Cox Creek, Cypress Creek, and the Tennessee River are used for recreational fishing.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Suparfund hazardous wait# tit* listtd undtf It* Compretoniiva Environmental flaiponM, Companaatton, and Uabihy Act (CSRCLA) at amandad Rgyjged
-------
oEPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
ASARCO, INC. (GLOBE PLANT)
Denver, Colorado
ASARCO, Inc.'s Globe Plant covers approximately 92 acres at 495 East 51st Avenue, Denver, Colorado, near a
neighborhood commonly known as Globeville. The site is in an industrial, commercial, and residential area of
Denver and Adams Counties, on the western edge of the South Platte River channel and approximately 2.7 miles
upstream of where the river meets Clear Creek. With the exception of the southeast section, the majority of the
site is on a terrace that rises from 30 to 60 feet above the South Platte River floodplain.
The Globe Plant began operating in 1886, producing gold, silver, copper, and lead. In 1901, American Smelting
and Refining Co. (later renamed ASARCO, Inc.) purchased the site and converted it to a lead smelter. In 1921,
lead smelting was replaced by arsenic trioxide production, which lasted for about 5 years, when the plant changed
to cadmium production. Currently, cadmium, litharge (lead oxide), thallium, and other high-purity metals are
produced.
Local and State governments, as well as EPA, have investigated the site over the years. In 1974, the Colorado
Department of Health (CDH) analyzed water and sediment in Industrial Ditch, which borders the site to the west.
The ditch has historically received runoff from the ASARCO facility and conveyed excess surface water through
a series of conduits to the South Platte River. Elevated levels of cadmium, lead, and zinc were detected downstream
of the ditch. In 1980 and 1981, CDH found that ASARCO was violating the Colorado Solid Waste Disposal Sites
and Facilities Act. In December 1981, the State sued ASARCO for damages to natural resources under CERCLA
Section 107. As a result, the State and ASARCO conducted joint remedial investigations, which yielded a
comprehensive report characterizing onsite wastes and documenting elevated levels of cadmium, arsenic, and zinc
in ground water, surface water, surface water sediments, and soil. Among the waste sources releasing hazardous
substances are the former Neutralization Pond and associated Precipitate Pile, the Slag Pile, and contaminated soil
both on and off the ue.
Wetlands and fisheries within 15 downstream miles of the site are subject to actual and potential contamination from
surface water that has migrated off the site.
Contaminated soil extends from the plant for several hundred feet in all directions, and underlie homes of 300
residents of nearby Globeville.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Suparfund hf!?*"*""* wu* (A* lifted under tha Comprehensive Emironmenal Bwponia, Compensation. and Liability Act (CERCU) a* amended
-------
v>EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
SUMMITVILLE MINE
Rio Grande County, Colorado
Summitville Mine is located in the Sail Juan Mountains near Del Norte in Rio Grande County, Colorado. The
1,400-acre site is extremely remote at an elevation of more than 11,000 feet, making the site accessible by
vehicle only in the summer months.
Mining began at Summitville in the late 1800s. The most recent operator, Summitville Consolidated Mining
Corp., Inc. (SCMCI), began open pit mining and recovering gold by cyanide heap leaching in 1986.
SCMCI originally designed the mining operation as a non-discharging waste water facility. Problems with
discharges eventually required SCMCI to obtain a NPDES permit from the State to operate a waste water
treatment plant.
Several releases of water contaminated with cyanide and metals have been documented at the mine. The State
has issued Notices of Violation to SCMCI for unpermitted releases of contaminated water. Pish kills have been
reported from Wightman Fork downstream to Terrace Reservoir, approximately 20 miles downstream from the
mine site.
Because SCMCI has declared bankruptcy, EPA is maintaining the site using CERCLA emergency funds to
ensure that ISO million gallons of water contaminated with cyanide and metals are not released into Wightman
Fork. Wightman Fork flows into the Alamosa River 5 miles downstream.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See
56 FR 5600, February II, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superhjnd hazardous warn litt Hitod und#f thaComprahamiv# Envtrormantal Ratporaa, Compantatlon, and LlaMity Act (CERCLA) a» amanded Reused
-------
c/EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May
PLYMOUTH AVENUE COUNTY LANDFILL
DeLand, Florida
The 131-acre Plymouth Avenue Landfill is located in a thinly populated residential and commercial area
approximately 1.75 miles west of the corporate limits of DeLand in Volusia County, Florida. From the early 1940s
until 1971, the site was used as an open dump. Since 1971, it has been a sanitary landfill under the ownership of
the Volusia County Department of Public Works. From 1984 through August 1988, the site received all types of
nonhazardous industrial and municipal solid wastes. The landfill now accepts only household waste, yard
trimmings, and construction debris.
Exact disposal practices at the facility from 1941 to approximately 1978 are unknown. From June 1978 to October
1980, the landfill reportedly received 4,500 gallons per week of process waste slurry from Brunswick Corp. in De
Land. Brunswick generated the waste from a nitric acid process for polishing steel. The waste was spread over
the land or deposited into shallow trenches in the southeastern section of the landfill. During 1980, Brunswick
shifted to a sulfuric acid process. From September 1980 through August 1988, three consecutive disposal pits were
constructed at the landfill to receive the slurried sulfuric acid process waste (also known as iron sulfate/calcium
sulfate waste). The pits received approximately 900 pounds per day of Brunswick waste. Both the nitric acid and
sulfuric acid waste streams included nickel, chromium, and copper. No further waste from Brunswick was received
by the landfill after 1988.
The Plymouth Avenue Landfill has considerable topographic variation, with several karst characteristics, including
sinkholes. Two major water-bearing units underlie the area: the surficial aquifer and the deeper Floridan aquifer.
The aquifers are hydraulically connected so that water can move between them. The Floridan is the principal source
of drinking water in the county; the surficial aquifer supplies some domestic wells, which range in depth from 15
to 50 feet. Wells within 4 miles of the landfill supply water to an estimated 25,106 people. Ground water is also
used to irrigate nearby citrus groves.
In 1990, EPA detected elevated levels of contaminants such as bis (2-ethyhexyl) phthalate, barium, cobalt,
manganese, and nickel in monitoring wells in the surficial aquifer. Additionally, samples collected by Volusia
County from three private wells near the landfill repeatedly exceeded EPA's Primary Drinking Water Standards for
nitrates. These residents are still using the private wells.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Suparfund hazardous wait* (it* Hatad under tha Comprahanaiva Enwonmantal Raaponaa, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) aa amandad
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Sits Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
DEL MONTE CORP. (OAHU PLANTATION)
Honolulu County, Hawaii
Del Monte Corp.'s Oahu Plantation occupies 6,000 acres in Honolulu County, Hawaii, near the small village of
Kunia on the coastal plain of the Island of Oahu. The area surrounding the plantation is used mostly for agricultural
and military purposes. Del Monte has cultivated pineapple on the plantation since the 1940s. In pineapple
agriculture, fiimigants are used to control nematodes that infest the pineapple root. The dominant fumigant used
at the plantation from the 1940s until 1983 was ethylene dibromide (EDB).
During the spring of 1980, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) began a program designed to determine
whether the fumigants used in pineapple agriculture had contaminated drinking water wells on Oahu. As part of
this program, the Del Monte Kunia well was sampled. The well is located on the Oahu Plantation and provided
drinking water for the approximately 700 residents of Kunia. Analyses detected two fumigants, EDB and 1,2-
dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP). On April 25, 1980, HDOH ordered the Del Monte Kunia well removed from
service. Water from the contaminated well is sprinkled onto noncrop fields.
Following the discovery of contamination, investigations by Del Monte, HDOH, and the Hawaii Department of
Agriculture revealed two sources of contamination: an area used to store drums of fumigant from the 1940s until
1975, and an area near the well where 495 gallons of EDB spilled in 1977. Soils and ground water beneath these
sources contained high concentrations of EDB and DBCP, according to over 400 analyses conducted between 1981
and 1991.
Since the discovery of contamination at the Kunia well, Del Monte engaged in remedial activities at the site,
including the removal of 18,000 tons of soil, which was spread on a nearby field.
Despite these actions, the Kunia well contains concentrations of EDB and DBCP that are greater than the Cancer
Risk Screening levels for these two contaminants.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
41
Suparfund hazardous vr&sM tto Rand undar tha Comprahanaiva Environroantat Raaponsa, Companaatoct, and Liability Act (CCACLA) as amandad Reviswd
-------
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
QERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
BLACKBIRD MINE
Lemhi, Idaho
Blackbird Mine is in Lemhi, 21 miles east of Salmon in east-central Idaho. The mine covers approximately 830
acres of private patented mining claims and 10,000 acres of unpatented claims, all within Salmon National Forest.
Blackbird Mine is in the Panther Creek drainage, part of the Salmon River system, and is surrounded by steep rocky
slopes. The mine lies on a surface water divide of two tributaries that drain from Panther Creek: Big Deer Creek
and Blackbird Creek, which includes several small tributary streams and springs.
Since the late 1800s, various companies have mined cobalt and copper by both shaft and open pit methods. The
current owner, the Noranda Mining Co., has not operated the mine since 1982. Mining tunnels and waste rock piles
are scattered along approximately 8 miles of Meadow and Blackbird Creeks. The piles and the open pit mine are
located at the headwaters of Bucktail Creek, a tributary of Big Deer Creek. The piles range in size from several
hundred to 2 million cubic yards.
Acid drainage from the tunnels and leaching from waste piles contribute to the poor quality of streams in the area.
Many investigations have documented the poor water quality and negative impacts on aquatic life of creeks
downstream of the mine. The most recent sampling, conducted in January 1992 by the Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality, documented high levels of arsenic, copper, cobalt, and nickel in downstream surface water
and sediments. Copper levels exceeded EPA's Fresh Water Ambient Water Quality Criteria.
The Snake River Sockeye Salmon, designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as an endangered species, and
the Snake River spring/summer Chinook Salmon, designated as a threatened species are potentially affected by poor
water quality.
In December 1983, the Idaho Attorney General filed a natural resource damage suit under CERCLA Section 107
against Noranda and two previous owners/operators of Blackbird Mine, Howmet Turbine Component Corp. and
Hanna Mining Co. The suit alleges damage to State surface waters and ground waters. The suit has not yet been
setded.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600. February II, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous waste sit* listed under tha Comprehensive Environment* Response. CompwwMlon, and UaMIfcjr Act (CERCLA) as amended
-------
May 1993
TRIUMPH MINE TAILINGS PILES
Triumph, Idaho
The Triumph Mine Tailings Piles site consists of two large piles of tailings along the south side of the East Fork
Road in a relatively rural area of Blaine County, Idaho. The mine itself, now inactive, is located north of the East
Fork Road. The two piles combined occupy approximately 60 acres. The East Fork of the Wood River flows near
the southern edge of the tailings piles.
From 1882 until 1957, the Triumph Mine processed ore rich in silver, zinc, and lead. Processing included
crushing, grinding, and flotation operations. The slurry remaining from the flotation process was pumped to the
upper pile from 1882 to 1930, and to the lower pile from 1930 to 1957.
EPA investigations conducted in 1991 and 1992, have revealed elevated levels of heavy metals in the tailings piles
and former mine areas. These metals, such as lead and arsenic, have migrated into residential soil, ambient air,
and nearby wetlands. Lead has also been detected above Federal drinking water standards in one of the two
community wells on two occasions during spring months.
In cooperation with State and local health agencies, local residents participated in screening for lead in the
bloodstream and arsenic in urine on three occasions. Although the results did document some community
exposures, the results were generally not above national averages.
As a result of the investigations, EPA, with assistance from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), an arm of the public health service, is evaluating early action for the site. EPA is working with the
community to evaluate options for immediate action that would effectively reduce the potential for human exposure
to the metals in the environment. Community interviews were conducted in the spring of 1992 and a community
workgroup was recently formed to encourage public participation in the decision-making process.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site war scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February U, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supffrjnd hmrdDU» win *m ImmI und* trComprthirty Envtronmwittl Rwpww, Ocwy«wtflon(
-------
fh rOA UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
* * agency
May 19§3
QERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT (USDOE)
Paducah, Kentucky
The Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) is a uranium enrichment facility covering approximately 1,350 acres
in western McCracken County approximately 10 miles west of Paducah, Kentucky, and about 3 miles south of the
Ohio River. PGDP began operating in 1952 and is owned and operated by the U.S. Department of Energy
(USDOE). The facility is currently managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
Approximately 740 acres of the plant are located within a fenced security area. An uninhabited buffer zone
surrounds the fenced area. Beyond the USDOE-owned buffer zone is an extensive wildlife management area of
2,100 acres deeded or leased to the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
PGDP performs the first step in the uranium enrichment process, enriching uranium-235 (U-235) in a physical
separation process. The separation process is based on the faster rate at which U-235 diffuses through a barrier,
in comparison with the heavier uranium-238 (U-238). Subsequent to processing at PGDP, the uranium is further
enriched at another USDOE gaseous diffusion plant. Extensive support facilities are required to maintain the
diffusion process, including a steam plant, four major electrical switchyards, four sets of cooling towers, a building
for chemical cleaning and decontamination, a water treatment plant, maintenance facilities, and laboratory facilities.
Plant operations have generated hazardous, nonhazardous, and radioactive wastes, including PCBs, trichloroethene
(TCE), uranium (multiple isotopes), and technetium-99 (Tc-99). In August 1988, USDOE found Tc-99 in an offsite
drinking water well north of PGDP. TCE has also been detected in nearby private wells and onsite monitoring
wells. Approximately 1,400 people obtain drinking water from public and private wells within 4 miles of PGDP.
USDOE has detected PCBs in onsite surface water and downstream of die plant in Big Bayou Creek and in Little
Bayou Creek. These creeks are part of the West Kentucky Wildlife Management Area located adjacent to the
facility. Big Bayou Creek is currently used for fishing. In 1989, the State of Kentucky's Division of Water warned
against consumption of fish caught from Little Bayou Creek.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supwfund hazardous wait* •!» ttMd undar lha Comprahaniive Envfconnwnul Raapenaa, Cofnpanution. and UaMfty Art (CERCLA) ai amended
-------
nvEPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Sita Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST NPL
May 1993
BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER (USDA)
Beltsville, Maryland
The Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) covers 7,000 acres in suburban Washington, D.C. Beltsville
is located in the northern portion of Prince Georges County, Maryland. Owned and operated by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the facility has conducted research on animal husbandry, dairying, and animal
diseases since 1910. Large agricultural plots and 800 buildings, including research laboratories, administrative
offices, shops, greenhouses, barns, and a few houses are located on the site.
Of the 16 sources of hazardous wastes BARC has identified to date, only the Biodegradable Materials Disposal Site
was evaluated in detail initially. From at least 1946 to the mid-to-late 1970s, the 4-acre area was used for disposal
of metal drums, plastic containers, casings for transformers, and laboratory wastes. USDA analyses in 1990 and
1992 of soil, ground water, surface water, and surface water sediments detected elevated levels of poly aromatic
hydrocarbons; several pesticides; PCBs; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; trichloroethene; xylenes; arsenic; barium; beryllium;
copper; lead; manganese; mercury; nickel; and zinc.
A trailer park, high school, several housing developments, and many other Federal installations are located within
4 miles of the site. Paint Branch, Little Paint Branch, Indian Creek, and Beaver Dam Creek collect drainage from
BARC, which flows to the Anacostia River and eventually to the Potomac River. Hazardous substances threaten
the wetlands adjacent to Beaver Dam Creek. Fisheries in the Northeast Branch and the Anacostia River provide
a habitat for the Bald Eagle, a species designated as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and for the
Swamp Pink, a flower designated as a threatened species.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
\Tfur
SupwfUnd hazardous wast* titt ittod und« ft* CwnprahansJva Environment* Rtapomt. ComptiMUion. and LtaWlty Act (CEftCU) u wwndad
-------
£%. rTlA UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Vl"1 ' AGENCY
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST NPL
May 190g
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
ORDNANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cecil County, Maryland
The Ordinance Products, Inc. (OPI), site is located 2 miles northeast of the Town of North East in Cecil County,
Maryland. The 94.6-acre property, currendy occupied by an industrial park and warehousing facility known as
Mechanics Valley Trade Center (MVTC), is located in a rural area. OPI purchased the property in 1960 and began
operating an ordnance manufacturing facility. During the Vietnam conflict, OPI manufactured grenade fuses,
detonation devices, smoke grenades, and other types of ordnance. Some off-specification ordnance was burned in
open pits and ordnance was buried onsite. The waste water resulting from manufacturing operations was disposed
of into five unlined surface impoundments. Kraus Design, Inc. (KDI) became a holding company for OPI in 1969.
OPI ceased manufacturing ordnance in 1972 and closed the facility. In 1986, the site was purchased by MVTC,
which planned to develop the site as an industrial park. Since that time MVTC, and the site were sold but retained
the MVTC corporate endty. MVTC is currendy renting buildings in a secure portion of the site to several tenants.
In 1987, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) discovered the site while investigating a nearby
property. An extensive MDE sampling program detected elevated levels of metals such as arsenic, selenium, and
barium in onsite soils, ground water, and surface water. MDE also detected elevated concentrations of
trichloroethene; 1,2-dichloioethene; tetrachloroethene; vinyl chloride; and xylene in two onsite wells and four offsite
residential drinking water wells. One onsite well is currently connected to an air stripping tower and is still used
as a water source.
On June 27, 1988, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order under CERCLA Section 106(a) requiring KDI
to investigate the extent of soil contamination and the amount of buried ordnance onsite. The order requires KDI
to (1) remove all contaminated soils and buried ordnance from the site, (2) determine the extent the contaminated
ground water plume has migrated both on- and offsite, and (3) install a water treatment system on all residential
wells where concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have exceeded EPA's Maximum Contaminant
Levels (MCLs). In response, KDI has (1) installed 10 offsite ground water monitoring wells to facilitate the offsite
hydrogeological study, (2) installed activated carbon filtration units on four residential drinking water wells, and
is maintaining the units and sampling the wells every 6 weeks, and (3) removed some contaminated soils and
ordnance that had been buried onsite.
KDI's investigation identified the following hazardous waste sources, some of which KDI has already removed
under the order: drums scattered over the site, five surface impoundments reportedly used for disposal of plating
wastes and other wastes, three subsurface disposal areas containing discarded ordnance, three burn areas also
containing ordnance, and other areas of contaminated soil. KDI is continuing to evaluate these sources and also
plans to sample water and sediments of Little Northeast Creek, which is adjacent to the site.
On December 31, 1988, EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to MVTC requiring MVTC to maintain site
security and to operate and maintain the onsite air stripper.
KDI is continuing to remove all contaminated materials from the site and the offsite hydrogeological investigation.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supariund hazardous wast* srt* Hated undar tha Comprahanilva Environmental Raaponaa, Compensation, and UaMhy Act (CERCLA) at amandad
Reviied
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST NPL
May 1993
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE
Bedford, Massachusetts
Hanscom Air Force Base occupies approximately 1,120 acres in the towns of Bedford, Concord, Lexington, and
Lincoln in Middlesex County, Massachusetts. The facility is located in a light industrial area of eastern
Massachusetts. A public airfield was constructed at this location in 1941 and military operations began in 1942.
In 1952, the Commonwealth ceded 396 acres of land and leased 641 acres to the Air Force; 83 acres were
retained by the Commonwealth. After military flying activities ceased in 1973, the Commonwealth regained
control of the leased portion of the base. The airfield and the surrounding land were given to the Massachusetts
Port Authority (Massport), which operates a civilian airport as L.G. Hanscom Field. The Air Force still
occupies the 396 acres ceded to it in 1952 and operates the Electronic Systems Division of the Air Force
Systems Command as Hanscom Air Force Base. The entire original 1,120-acre area is considered a Federal
facility.
During the 32 years that the Air Force occupied the airfield, numerous hazardous substances were used,
generated, and disposed of on what is now Massport property and on the Airbase. These substances included
chlorinated solvents, gasoline and jet fuel, aromatic solvents, tetraethyllead, and PCBs. A total of 14 possible
source areas have been identified to date. Among them are: two former fire training areas, a paint waste
disposal area, a jet fuel residue/tank sludge area, two landfills, a former industrial waste water treatment
system, a former filter bed area, an elemental mercury spill, and a PCB transformer storage area.
Bedford draws its drinking water from ground water beneath the base. Three of the Town's wells were closed
in 1984, when they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In addition, two
wells for the Veterans Administration Hospital in Bedford were closed in 1980, when VOCs were detected in
the well water. In 1991, the Town of Bedford conducted a remedial investigation at the base. Ground water
and surface water samples contained VOCs and it was concluded that the base was a likely source of the
contamination in the Town water supply.
Numerous remedial activities have taken place on both the Air Force and Massport properties to address areas
of contamination. Drums have been removed at both the Paint Waste Disposal Area and the Jet Fuel
Residue/Tank Sludge Area. Contaminated soils have been removed and placed in a secured landfill. A ground
water remediation system has been constructed to remove VOC contamination from the ground water beneath
the base.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See
56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
i
Suparlundhuardow watt* tit* !MBdund«rtti«CoD9r«6*niivaEnvlionm*nialRMponM,Cttnp*nntion,wdlJabWy Act {CERCL^M«m«MM
-------
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST NPU
A |-r%A UNITED STATES
tfVriA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
' * AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460 May 19^
NATICK LABORATORY ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND
ENGINEERING CENTER
Natick, Massachusetts
The U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Center, commonly known as the Natick Laboratory, is
located on Kansas Street in Natick, Middlesex County, Massachusetts. The Natick Laboratory occupies a
peninsula on the eastern shore of Lake Cochituate and is bordered to the north by a residential zone. The
Natick Laboratory facility is located on 74 acres that was purchased by the Army in 1949 from the Metropolitan
District Commission. The property was primarily used as a forested recreational area but also included a gravel
pit in the section known as the Building T-25 Area. The Army completed the construction of the Natick
Laboratory in 1954; since then, several industrial, laboratory, and storage activities have taken place on the
grounds for research and development in food science, aero-mechanical, clothing, material, and equipment
engineering.
In its operations, the Anny used various substances including tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, carbon
disulfide, benzene, chloroform, tetraethyllead, acetone and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs), "standard
laboratory chemicals," mineral spirits/turpentine, paints, inks, lubricants, gasoline, several pesticides, and metal
dusts.
Two sources of hazardous substances have been identified onsite. The Building T-25 Area was identified as
potentially contaminated around 1989, when personnel at the facility noticed a sheen on the runoff water
generated during rain storms. In 1989, construction work was halted in the Gymnasium Area when construction
workers noticed a benzene-like odor in soil from a boring that was drilled for construction of a gymnasium.
In 1989, the Army conducted soil gas surveys in the Building T-25 and Gymnasium Areas and detected several
VOCs. Soil, ground water, and surface water samples contained elevated concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethene,
benzene, carbon disulfide, bis (2-ethylhexyl) ph thai ate, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, Freon 113,
naphthalene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, arsenic, barium, copper, chromium, lead, zinc, calcium, and sodium.
Other potential sources of chlorinated organic compounds have been identified near Natick Laboratory.
Petroleum, organic compounds, and chlorinated solvents have been released into soil and ground water at a
property previously occupied by a laundromat, approximately 3,600 feet southeast of the laboratory well field
across Lake Cochituate. An "old laundromat" is also reported to exist approximately 2,670 feet east-southeast
of the Springvale well field. Certain establishments located on Routes 9, 27, and 30, and some automotive
garages in the area may also be sources of VOC contamination in the ground water near the Evergreen and
Springvale municipal well fields.
Approximately 37,000 people obtain drinking water from wells within 4 miles of the facility.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See
56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous waste site listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CCRCLA) as amended
Revised
-------
SEPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Sits Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
POTTER CO.
Wesson, Mississippi
Potter Co. manufactures electrical components, including electromagnetic interference filters and capacitors, at a
plant in Wesson, Copiah County, Mississippi, approximately 43 miles southwest of Jackson. Operations began on
the 12-acre property in 1953. Land within 1 mile is primarily used for residential and agricultural purposes.
In 1986, Varian Associates, Inc. purchased Pulse Engineering, Inc., of which Potter was a subsidiary. At that time,
employees expressed concern over how wastes had been handled at the plant. Subsequent sampling by Potter in
April and May 1986 detected PCBs and solvents in onsite surface soils. PCB oils used in the capacitors were
cleaned from process equipment with solvents, primarily trichloroethene (TCE). The oil-solvent mixtures were
dumped onto the ground outside the manufacturing buildings. In November 1986, additional sampling by Potter
detected PCBs in soils in drainage ditches and on adjacent residential property.
In May 1986, the State of Mississippi issued an order requiring Potter to determine the extent of PCB contamination
in soils, develop a plan to remove the contaminated soils, and install a monitoring well. Potter detected PCBs,
TCE, and several other organic compounds in the new monitoring well, and also in several other monitoring wells.
Analyses conducted by the Mississippi Bureau of Pollution Control in August 1987 found that Wesson's two
municipal wells, located approximately 1,000 feet southeast of Potter, contained significant concentrations of TCE.
The wells were closed and the City installed new wells in June 1989. These new wells, however, are less than 1
mile southeast of the closed contaminated municipal wells. An estimated 1,500 people obtain drinking water from
municipal wells within 4 miles of the site.
In November 1987, Potter installed a synthetic liner over contaminated soil in one of the plant's drainage ditches.
Soil from the most heavily contaminated areas of the adjacent property was placed on a roll-off container and
covered with a tarp.
In 1988 and 1989, further studies by Potter were conducted to characterize the extent of PCB contamination in
surface soils and to determine the extent of the TCE plume in ground water.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional irtformation is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Suparfund hazardous waaia sits llsiad undar Itta Comprahaniiva Environmental Raaponsa, Campanaalion.and UaMtty Act (CSRCLA) aa amandad fleyjged
<©
-------
£% pQA UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
*-¦ ' 1 agency
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 19S3
HORSESHOE ROAD
Sayreville, New Jersey
The Horseshoe Road site covers approximately 9 acres on Horseshoe Road near the Raritan River in northern
Sayreville, Middlesex County, New Jersey. The area around the site is densely populated and includes large
residential, business, commercial, and industrial areas. Approximately 47 houses are located to the southeast
within 0.5 mile of the site.
The site consists of four areas that are considered one NPL site because: (1) they are part of the same
operation, (2) in general, they have the same potentially responsible parties, (3) contamination is threatening the
same ground water, surface water, and air, and (4) they are no more than about 1,000 feet apart.
The history of the site is complex, involving numerous real estate transactions. At least 18 entities were
involved in the four areas during 1965-81, according to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy (NJDEPE). The four areas are described below.
Horseshoe Road Drum Dump (Marsh Area Drums), where approximately 70 drums, many corroded and some
labeled cyanide, were discovered during a fire in 1981. Using CERCLA emergency funds, EPA relocated the
drums onto the Atlantic Development Corp. area of the site. The dump is in a wetland.
Atlantic Development Corp. Area, where several companies manufactured, processed, and blended various
chemicals. During 1975-82, NJDEPE took numerous legal actions against the companies. In mid-1980,
NJDEPE removed over 1,000 drums from the area after the companies failed to do so. NJDEPE analyses of
soil samples in 1985 detected volatile organic compounds (including toluene), semivolatile organic compounds,
and heavy metals. EPA soil analyses in 1989 detected similar hazardous substances, plus pesticides and PCBs.
In an April 1991 onsite inspection, EPA found 400 5-gallon containers holding solids and semisolids of various
colors. Most containers were open, and many were crushed as a result of a fire in 1983.
Sayreville Pesticide Dump, an abandoned property now in the custody of the State. In die April 1991
inspection, EPA found at least 160 corroded or crushed drums, many containing a white powder. NJDEPE's
1985 analyses detected benzene, ethylbenzene, and toluene in soil, and EPA's 1989 analyses detected 1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene, copper, and mercury. Surface water and sediments in a small stream originating near the
Sayreville Pesticide Dump contain heavy metals (copper, lead, and mercury); phenol; bis (2-chloroethyl) ether;
methoxychlor; lindane; chloroform; and 1,2-dichloroethane, according to EPA's 1989 analyses. Hard clams are
harvested from Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, coastal tidal waters within 15 miles downstream of the site.
Wetlands on and off the site are also threatened. An estimated 14,000 people obtain drinking water from public
wells within 4 miles of the site.
Atlantic Resources Corp., where precious metals, and perhaps solvents, were recycled during 1972-85 by
Atlantic Resources Corp. and International Resources Corp. Twice during the winter of 1986-87, mercury
spilled onto the ground. In March 1987, EPA used CERCLA emergency funds to remove 70 pounds of
mercury and contaminated soil to a hazardous waste facility regulated under Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. EPA also removed thirty 5-gallon containers of sodium cyanide, which was
used in the metal recycling process.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See
56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous mitt sit* iatad undar tha Comprehensive Enviranmantal Ratponia, Companaadon, and UaMity Act (CERCLA) at amandad
-------
s»EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
ONONDAGA LAKE
Syracuse, New York
The Onondaga Lake site is located in the City of Syracuse and in the Towns of Salina, Geddes, and Camillus,
Onondaga County, New York. Onondaga Lake is approximately 4.5 miles long and averages 1 mile in width.
Seven major tributaries flow into the lake; water exits the lake via a barge canal at its northwest end and flows into
the Seneca River. The land immediately adjacent to the lake consists primarily of industrial properties and county
parks.
A ban was placed on public fishing from the lake in 1970 due to high concentrations of mercury in several species
of fish. The lake was re-opened to fishing in 1986 on a catch and release basis only. Population and industrial
growth in the areas surrounding Onondaga Lake has resulted in extensive biological, chemical, and physical
degradation of its waters. In addition to mercury contamination in the lake, analyses of sediment samples detected
barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, benzene, chlorobenzene, total xylenes, various polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons, pesticides, and PCBs.
Historical information indicates that the lake received surface water discharges from various industrial processes
and municipal waste water treatment plants. Initially, EPA has evaluated only operations of Allied Signal, Inc.
and/or its predecessors, and Linden Chemicals and Plastics, Inc. (LCP) now owned by the Hanlin Group. EPA
is attempting to identify additional potentially responsible parties.
The Allied facilities manufactured numerous organic and inorganic chemicals. Allied's Willis Avenue plant and
LCP's Bridge Street plant (located west of the Main Plant complex), used a mercury cell process to produce
chlorine, sodium hydroxide, and potassium hydroxide. Each plant discharged aqueous waste streams containing
mercury as part of normal operations. Other waste sources include Allied's Solvay Waste Beds containing by-
products generated from soda ash production and Semet Residue Ponds containing wastes generated from acid
washing of light oil.
Several consent orders have been signed in recent years between Allied and the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) regarding the Solvay Waste Beds, the Semet Residue Ponds and ground
water contamination at the location of the Willis Avenue Plant. In early 1992, Allied and the NYSDEC signed a
consent decree to perform a remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the type and extent of contamination
at Onondaga Lake and identify alternatives for remedial action.
NYSDEC has also filed an action against the Hanlin Group under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). The Hanlin Group commenced bankruptcy proceedings on July 10, 1991.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site waj scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous wut* site Nittd under the Comprehcnilve Environmental Reaponae, Compenaatfon, and Liability Act (CERCLA) aa amended
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST
OFRR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washinoton. DC 20460
NPU
May
PFOHL BROTHERS LANDFILL
Cheektowaga, New York
Pfohl Brothers Landfill, a privately owned and operated landfill, deposited municipal and industrial wastes between
1932 and 1971 at a 166.5-acre property in Cheektowaga, Erie County, New York. The northern section of the
landfill has been graded and is now occupied by a trucking firm. The area is residential and commercial. Buffalo
International Airport is approximately 0.5 mile west of the site.
Chemical wastes in liquid, solid, and sludge form were either buried at the site in drums or placed into cells
excavated in the ground. The wastes deposited included cyanides and plating sludge, waste paint and paint sludge,
lithographic inks, pigments, organic solvents, liquid and solid PCB-contaminated wastes, sludge from distillation
processes, petroleum wastes, and 100 to 125 tons of phenol tar containing chlorinated benzenes and dioxins.
Since 1980, the Erie County Health Department, EPA, the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC), and the owner have investigated the site. A remedial investigation was conducted in
1988-89 by NYSDEC.
The investigations indicated that surface water both on and off the site is contaminated by organic chemicals,
including benzene, phenol, chlorobenzene, and dichlorobenzene. Nearby surface water consists of Ellicott Creek,
an adjacent ditch that leads into the creek, and Aero Lake, which lies just north of the ditch. The lake and creek
are used for recreational fishing. A wedand formerly existed in what is now the central section of the property.
Other wedands border the creek and ditch.
Onsite and offsite soil is contaminated with PCBs, barium, manganese, and mercury, according to the remedial
investigation. Most of the site is fenced, but drainage ditches contaminated with leachate from the landfill lie
outside the fencing and are accessible to the public. Ten homes are within 200 feet of an area of contaminated soil.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time die site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February II, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous wast* &ii» litttd undef the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, anc Lisbiily Act(CEBCtA) as amendeo
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORP. (PAINESVILLE WORKS)
Painesville, Ohio
Diamond Shamrock Corp. 's Painesville Works covers about 500 acres between Lake Erie and the Grand River in
Painesville, Lake County, Ohio. The site is bordered on the east by a large tire manufacturing company and on
the west by an industrial area in the city of Fairport Harbor.
The Diamond Shamrock Works began operations in 1912, producing mainly caustic soda. The plant also produced
chromate compounds, chlorine and chlorinated paraffins, and coke. Diamond Shamrock also accepted and disposed
of used spent pickle liquor from nearby steel industries. In October 1931, the plant began production of chromates,
including sodium dichromate, potassium dichromate, and chromic acid. The plant closed in 1972. In 1977, the
State of Ohio approved a reclamation plan submitted by Diamond Shamrock. In accordance with the plan, Diamond
Shamrock would cover one of the waste lakes with a clay cover. In 1986, Maxus Energy Corp. bought out
Diamond Shamrock Chemical Co. Shortly after, the property was divided into parcels, some of which were sold
to Standard Machine Equipment. During the demolition of buildings on the production site, PCBs were discovered
in the transformer oils. Oil containing PCBs was recovered, all onsite buildings were demolished, contaminated
soil was covered with clay, and the site graded to drain toward Lake Erie.
Eight sources are associated with the Diamond Shamrock Works; 0.75 million tons of chromate waste materials,
three waste lakes, a waste water retention basin, a hazardous waste landfill, chromate effluent treatment lagoons,
and contaminated soils in the main production area.
This site poses a threat to the drinking water intakes along Lake Erie, and to the fisheries, wetlands, and sensitive
environments in the Grand River and Lake Erie. Several substances were found in the surface water and sediment
sampling conducted in 1981 by EPA, including: hexavalent chromium, mercury, cyanide, ethylbenzene, xylene,
and naphthalene. Headlands Beach State Park, located approximately 0.25 mile west of the Grand River's entry
into Lake Erie, is a significant recreation area. The Grand River has several species of fin fish and is used for
sports fishing. Lake Erie is used for sport and commercial fishing. The Grand River and the adjacent stream-reach
to this site are partially lined with wetlands. The wetlands provide habitat for the River Otter, a State-endangered-
species. The area is also a prime habitat for the Indiana Bat. The Grand River in the vicinity of the site is
designated by the State of Ohio as an area for production and maintenance of aquatic life under section 305 of the
Clean Water Act.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
4 1
Superfund hazardous waste site listed under th* Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compenaation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) aa amended
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
DOVER CHEMICAL CORP.
Dover, Ohio
Dover Chemical Corp. occupies 60 acres on the corner of 15th and Davis Streets in the City of Dover, Tuscawaras
County, Ohio. The site is on the east bank of Sugar Creek, approximately 1 mile above where it meets the
Tuscawaras River. The area is primarily residential. The first facilities were constructed at the site before World
War II. Dover Chemical was incorporated in 1951. In 1974, Ansul Industries acquired the Dover site, and in 1975
the site was purchased by ICC Industries. Dover Chemical is a subsidiary of ICC industries.
Since 1949, the company has produced chlorinated organic compounds, including dichlorobenzene, trichlorobenzene,
tetrachlorobisphenol A (TCBA), and dihydroxybenzophenone by-products (later replaced with chlorinated paraffin
by-products). These by-products are used in manufacturing pressure lubricants, plasticizers, and flame retardants
for vinyl products, as well as phosphites (used for temperature, light, and color stabilization of plastics). Dover
Chemical also refined chemicals thought to have been contaminated with polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs)
and polychlorinated bibenzofurans (PCDFs) in the production area, which covers 9 acres.
In the early 1960s, Dover Chemical placed 4,000 gallons of mixed chlorinated benzene by-products in a low
swampy area in the southwest corner of the property and buried 10 drums of chlorinated paraffin by-products in
the east central portion of the property. In 1981, Dover removed 975 tons of waste material and surrounding
contaminated soil to a landfill permitted under Subtide C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Following the 1981 removal action, Dover conducted an environmental investigation, leading to a draft feasibility
study that was submitted to EPA and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) in April 1986. Both EPA
and OEPA rejected the report and requested that additional data be obtained to complete the remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS). In September 1988, Dover Chemical and EPA entered into an Administrative
Order on Consent under CERCLA section 104 to complete the RI/FS. During the RI, Dover Chemical detected
PCDDs and PCDFs in soils both on and off the site. Under an interim action Administrative Order on Consent,
issued by EPA in June 1991 under CERCLA Section 106, the company removed these contaminated soils,
transported them to a hazardous waste facility regulated under RCRA Subtitle C, and stabilized the areas. The
action was completed in October 1992.
In June 1991, EPA detected organics, including tetrachloroethene, chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzenes, and
trichlorobenzenes, in onsite monitoring wells. Approximately 27,000 people rely on wells within 4 miles of the site
for drinking water; included are 11,000 people serviced by the Dover municipal wells, oik of which is located 1,100
feet from the site, and 16,000 people serviced by the New Philadelphia municipal well field 3.9 miles from the site.
Late in 1992, Dover Chemical started pumping the contaminated ground water to the surface and treating it to
remove the contaminants. EPA expects to receive Dover Chemical's draft RI/FS report early in 1993.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Suparfund hazardous wast* tit* Hitad under (ha Comprehansiw Environmental Response, Compensation, and UaMlty Act (CERCLA) ai amended
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
NATIONAL ZINC CORP.
Bartfesville, Oklahoma
The National Zinc Corp. (NZC) site is located on a 135-acre property at 11th and Virginia Streets in Bartlesville,
Washington County, in northeastern Oklahoma. The Bartlesville area is primarily residential including schools, day
care centers, churches, playground parks, recreational areas, and business properties.
NZC operated a zinc smelter on this site from 1907 to 1976, when it was acquired by the Zinc Corporation of
America. NZC was also known as National Zinc Co., Horsehead, Inc., and St. Joe Mineral.
The NZC smelter had no air emission controls, allowing emissions to be deposited downwind in various areas in
Bartlesville. According to 1992 EPA reports, lead and cadmium levels in the top 2 feet of soil are greater than
three times natural background levels. Although the extent of the area of contamination has not been completely
determined, it includes contaminated soils at two schools and three day care centers. An estimated 1,700 students
attend the school and day care centers, and 170 people work at the facilities.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site way scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February J J, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supftund h«z«rdom limd tindw fr* Comyth*n»y Envtiunrwrnil RMponHiCwryoMimi, wr*3 Act (CEBCUA) m «mryW<3 ffcviiad
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
QERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
EAST MULTNOMAH COUNTY GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION
Multnomah County, Oregon
The East Multnomah County Ground Water Contamination site covers 3 square miles in Multnomah County east
of Portland, Oregon. Current studies indicate that the site involves plumes of ground water contaminated with
chlorinated organic solvents. The plumes are from individual sources and are mixing together.
EPA learned that trichloroethene (TCE) and two of its degradation products, 1,1-dichloroethene and 1,1-
dichloroethane, were contaminating ground water in 1986 when the Boeing Co. Portland Plant was closing a surface
impoundment under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). A subsequent
investigation by Boeing found ground water contamination upgradient of the plant. During 1987-1991, EPA
inventoried local businesses (many of which use TCE as a solvent) and investigated the area extensively, including
sampling wells and conducting an area-wide soil gas survey. The results documented three sources of ground water
plumes, including the Boeing plant, identified five potential sources requiring further investigation, and suggested
still more sources may be identified. The other two documented sources are Cascade Corp. and Swift Adhesives
(a division of Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.), both upgradient of the Boeing plant. Chlorinated organic solvents have
been detected in soils and ground water at both plants, as well as in downgradient ground water. Because the
Boeing plant is regulated under RCRA, it is not part of the NPL site, although its cleanup will be coordinated with
any CERCLA action.
Soil gas studies indicate that potential sources may exist at Norwest Paper, Firestone, Opticraft, Northwest
Retreader, and an area near Parker & Grantz Automotive. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has
started preliminary investigations at the Norwest Paper and Opticraft facilities.
In addition to the EPA investigations, the companies, either independently or under State enforcement orders, have
also conducted investigations. Recent studies by Swift Adhesives found that a well upgradient of its plant is showing
increased levels of organic solvents, suggesting a previously unidentified source.
An estimated 280,000 people (including 267,500 in Portland and vicinity) use the affected ground water for standby
wells.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous wasM site isted under ttie Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended
-------
c/EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
ICG ISELIN RAILROAD YARD
Jackson, Tennessee
The ICG Iselin Railroad Yard (ICG Iselin) is located in Jackson, Madison County, Tennessee. The 80-acre site
is situated at the intersection of Eastern Street and Magnolia Street in a predominately suburban area.
From 1906 to 1940, the property was owned and operated by Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co. (M&O). According
to a 1926 tax map for the City, the facility at one time included a round house, a steam locomotive fueling station,
a coal-fired power plant, and the locomotive maintenance building. In 1940, M&O was sold to Gulf Mobile & Ohio
Railroad Co., which reorganized in 1972 as the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co. (ICG). From 1972 to 1986 ICG
used the site as a locomotive maintenance facility. The Williams Steel Co. purchased partial acreage in 1986, and
used it as a steel fabrication facility until 1989. In that year, the property was transferred to its present owner Iselin
Properties, Inc. through Campbell & Associates. The remaining acreage is owned by Norfolk: Southern Railway
Co. The ICG Iselin site includes a main warehouse; numerous railroad tracks; storage tanks; a pollution abatement
system that includes a lye vat, a neutralization tank, several drainage ditches, a concrete tank, and a surface
impoundment; a battery waste disposal pile; and a fueling platform under an open-air shed.
Disposal practices at the site prior to 1972 are unknown. In 1973, ICG Iselin was issued a temporary NPDES
permit for discharge into river mile 0.5 of Jones Creek, pending the construction and approval of a pollution
abatement facility. In 1975 and in 1980, the facility reported that it exceeded its NPDES permit parameters for
chromium.
A 1990 investigation by the Tennessee Department of Health and Environment identified organic and inorganic
constituents in surface soils. In 1991, the EPA conducted further sampling. Both investigations showed elevated
levels of chromium, copper, and lead in surface soils. The 1991 investigation also identified vinyl chloride,
chloroethane, tetrachloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane, benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes in onsite sediments.
The Jackson Utility Division supplies drinking water to approximately 31,000 people from 10 wells within 4 miles
of the facility.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supwlund hazardous wan* •!» *«ad undar tha Comprehensive Environment* Raaponaa. Compensation. and UaMlty Act (CERCLA) as amended
-------
v>EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
MavlOSg
RSR CORP.
Dallas, Texas
The RSR Corp. site is on the west side of Dallas in Dallas County, Texas. The site consists of areas of
contaminated soil located south of the Trinity River, between Norwich and Hampton Roads, and north of the
Missouri Pacific Railroad tracks. RSR Corp.'s secondary lead smelter, located at 1111 West Mockingbird Street
at the comer of Westmoreland Road and Singleton Boulevard, emitted lead into the atmosphere. Before RSR
acquired the facility in 1971, the smelter had operated continuously since 1936 as Southern Lead, Southern Smelter,
or Murph Metals. The smelter processed lead slag and scrap from battery manufacturing. Operations stopped in
Because the wind blows predominately from the south, the lead emitted by the smelter was carried north and
deposited in a mixed residential-commercial area that includes 170 homes, parks, schools, churches, playgrounds,
day care centers, recreational facilities, and businesses. About 70 people work at a school on the site. EPA
conducted tests in 1992, and found battery casing chips contaminating areas approximately 1.5 miles west and 3
miles southwest of the smelter. In addition, areas near the smelter are contaminated from battery casing chips and
slag that have been used as fill for residences, driveways, and gardens.
In 1968, the City of Dallas began a series of legal actions against RSR Corp., including fines, lawsuits, and
compliance agreements for violations of air emission standards.
In 1982, monitors placed by the City and the Texas Air Control Board found that air lead levels near the smelter
exceeded EPA's National Ambient Air Quality Standard. In 1983, the State, City, and EPA ordered RSR to
conduct soil cleanup and control stack and fugitive emissions from the smelter. EPA ordered these actions under
an Administrative Order on Consent issued under CERCLA Section 106. In the same year, the Dallas Housing
Authority processed a Comprehensive Improvement and Assistance Plan application for its West Dallas housing
projects located to the northeast of the corner of Westmoreland and Singleton. The City ordered RSR to stop lead
smelting operations in 1984. In 1986, EPA confirmed completion of all soil cleanup and other activities under its
1983 order in the neighborhoods within 0.5 mile of the smelter.
In July 1991, the Texas Water Commission (TWC) notified EPA that hazardous wastes had been found in the West
Dallas area as a result of a citizen's complaint. EPA sampling confirmed elevated levels of lead and began working
with residents to remove the contaminated soils and replace them with clean soil.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Supartund hazardous wuu tit* listed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and LlabMty Act (CERCLA) as amended
1984.
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE/NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
Hampton, Virginia
The Langley Air Force Base (LAFB)/NASA Langley Research Center (NASA Langley) site consists of two adjacent
Federal facilities located in Hampton, Virginia, on a peninsula separating the Northwest and Southwest branches
of the Back River. The Back River supports commercial and recreational crab, oyster, quahog, and fin fishing. The
Back River's two branches form a tidal estuary that empties into the Chesapeake Bay.
LAFB is a 3,152-acre site with more than 10,000 employees. NASA Langley covers 772 acres and employs an
additional 5,000 government and contract workers. Residential, rural, and intertidal wetlands surround the facilities.
Wetlands in the Plum Tree Island National Wildlife Refuge are located northeast of the site.
LAFB has been an airfield and aeronautical research center since 1917 and is the home base for the First Tactical
Fighter Wing. NASA Langley is a research facility that conducts 270 operations in 191 buildings and operates 40
wind tunnels. Wastes generated at LAFB and NASA Langley include waste oils, solvents, paint wastes, pesticide
containers and rinse waters, photographic wastes, scrap materials, used batteries, and printed circuit board plating
wastes. PCBs and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCTs) were used in hydraulic systems, electrical equipment,
compressors, and casting operations.
Previous studies conducted at the two facilities identified over 30 possible sources of contamination. Initially, four
sources were evaluated in detail.
Landfills 10, 11, and 12, located in the northern part of the site were used from approximately 1950 until 1980.
Wastes known or suspected to have been disposed of at this source included waste solvents and paints, used
batteries, scrap metal, pesticides, municipal wastes, general chemicals, sanitary refuse, photofinishing wastes, and
hospital and lab wastes. Analytical data revealed lead, cadmium, silver, and phenols in ground water. Available
information indicates that this area had been predominantly wetlands.
Sediment and biota in the Back River and Tabbs Creek (a tributary of the northwest branch of the Back River) are
contaminated extensively with PCBs and PCTs. Tabbs Creek, in which highest levels of contamination were found,
is inaccessible to the public for security reasons and has been posted as a "no fishing" area because of coliform
contamination.
Storm sewers, sumps, and three drainage systems also are being evaluated (Sources Nos. 11,12, and 30). Releases
has been observed below the storm sewer outfalls. The storm sewers are subject to storm and tidal influences.
Electrical equipment containing PCBs and lubricating oils, hydraulic fluids, mercury, and pesticides have been
released on the site.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Sup«ffund hazardous wattt lit* imd under tha Comprahwitiva Environmantal Ftaaporw®, Compan*afen. and Liability Act (CERCLA) at amended
-------
May 19^2
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
Quantico, Virginia
The Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) is located in Quantico, Virginia, 35 miles south of
Washington, D.C. along the Potomac River. The MCCDC covers approximately 56,000 acres in southern Prince
William County, northern Stafford County, and eastern Fauquier County. MCCDC is bordered by Prince William
Forest Park to the north and the Potomac River to the east. Residential areas are located on the western and southern
portions of the base.
Operations at MCCDC began in 1917 when 5,300 acres of land adjacent to the Potomac River near Quantico was
leased by the Department of Defense in order to establish a new marine training camp. In April 1943, 50,985 acres
of land west of Route 1 was obtained to accommodate increased training activities. Currently the emphasis at the
Command is to prepare Marine Corps officers for general combat by providing varied background in tactical
operations and performing research and development of Marine Corps equipment.
Studies conducted by the Navy in 1988 identified five areas of potential contamination. The three described below
were initially evaluated in detail.
The Old Landfill was the primary base landfill from the 1920s to 1971. It covers 8 acres along the west bank of
the Potomac River. The northern portion of the landfill, known as the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office
storage yard, was used for the draining and storage of electrical transformers. Extensive PCB contamination has
been identified in soils, ground water, and Potomac River sediments.
The Recently Closed Landfill is a 28-acre landfill that operated from 1971 to 1983. Wastes disposed of from base
activities included waste paints and solvents. Landfill leachate was observed leaking from the southern portion of
the landfill. Shallow ground water and leachate samples were found to contain various organic compounds.
The Old Batch Plant is an area 30 feet by 50 feet that was used for the storage of electrical transformers in the
1970s. The majority of the area is paved, but covered with varying amounts of soil. Soils are contaminated with
PCBs. Surface water runoff drains into the Potomac River.
Another source that has been identified is the Pesticide Burial Area, where pesticides were dumped into a pit 16
feet in diameter by 8 feet deep. Pesticide contamination was detected, but not quantified, and arsenic contamination
was detected in one soil boring. In addition, the Arsenic Burial Area was used for a one-time disposal of 27 drums
containing the product "arsenic of lead", apparently used for weed control.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superiund hazardous wast* tit* tend urxto ttw Comprehensive Environment* Rasponsa, Companaatfon, and LiaMUQr Act(CERCLA) *» amandad
-------
SEPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 1993
PACIFIC SOUND RESOURCES
Seattle, Washington
The West Seattle wood treating plant of Pacific Sound Resources (PSR) is located at 2801 Southwest Florida Street
in Seattle, King County, Washington. The 20-acre property is in an industrial area on the shore of Elliott Bay and
Puget Sound, near the Duwamish River. Wood treating operations at the plant date to 1906. PSR has owned and
operated the facility since 1964. Another turn-of-the-century wood treating facility owned and operated by PSR
(formerly the Wyckoff Co.) since 1964 was placed on the NPL in 1987 as part of the Wyckoff Co.-Eagle Harbor
site.
Operations at the two facilities have been similar. The primary wood preservatives used were creosote, which
consists primarily of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and pentachlorophenol (PCP). Each was mixed with fuel
oil. In addition, substantial quantities of chemonite, which contains copper, arsenic, and zinc, were also used.
Wood treatment operations at the West Seattle plant have contaminated soil, ground water, and Puget Sound
sediments with creosote, PCP, fuel oil, and chemonite metals. A significant source of contamination was a "transfer
table," where containers were loaded and unloaded. The transfer table was located in a shallow unlined earthen
pit known as the "transfer table pit." Numerous investigations of the pit, including one by EPA in 1989, have
documented contamination with arsenic, chromium, copper, zinc, and PAHs. In August/September 1990, PSR
excavated approximately 450 cubic yards of soils and sludge from the pit, placed them in a containment box on the
northeast end of the site, and covered the box with a 3-inch layer of concrete over wire mesh.
Another source of hazardous substances at the site is an area adjacent to Elliott Bay where three aboveground tanks
were formerly used to store creosote. A major leak occurred at one of the tanks in 1970. In addition, numerous
spills occurred over the years from pipelines leading to the tanks.
Heavy metals and PAHs were found in Elliott Bay by the Washington Department of Ecology and EPA in 1988.
Hazardous substances from the site can flow overland from the site to Elliott Bay through storm drains, direct
surface runoff, flooding, and accidental spills or drips. The bay is a fishery, a critical migratory corridor for
anadromous fish, and a subarea identified in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan for the Puget
Sound National Estuary.
In July/August 1991, EPA found heavy metals and PAHs in onsite soil and air downwind of the site. An estimated
150 people live within 0.25 mile of the site, and 175,000 within 4 miles.
Since 1984, EPA has issued several administrative orders against Wyckoff under CERCLA, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Clean Water Act (CWA) requiring investigation and cleanup at
the site.
In 1985, Wyckoff and officials no longer associated with PSR, pleaded guilty to violations of RCRA for storing
hazardous waste at the West Seattle plant without a RCRA permit and violations of CWA for discharging wood
preserving residues into the West Waterway of the Duwamish River.
(The description of the site (releasej is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional irtformation is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
(Gpg)
Suparhmd hazwdous was I* sit* listed undar ft* Comprahensivt Environmental Ratponaa, Compilation, and UaMlty Act (CERCLA) at amandad
-------
&EPA
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
OERR Hazardous Site Evaluation Division Washington. DC 20460
May 199?
PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD COMPLEX
Bremerton, Washington
The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex is located in Bremerton, Washington, along Sinclair Inlet on Puget Sound
approximately 15 miles west of Seattle. The Navy has owned and operated facilities at this location since 1891.
The complex, which consists of the Naval Shipyard and the Naval Supply Center, employs over 12,000 people.
The site covers approximately 350 acres of land and an additional 340 acres of tidelands along 11,000 feet of
shoreline. The complex contains over 300 buildings and structures, 6 deep water piers, 6 dry docks, and numerous
moorings. The major industrial activities at the complex include construction, repair, overhaul, maintenance,
mooring, berthing, and dry docking of naval ships and staging and supply of materials. The activities generate a
large amount of hazardous waste.
EPA has identified 58 known or potential sources of contamination at the complex. In 1990 and 1991, the Navy
found elevated levels of heavy metals, semivolatile organic compounds, PCBs, and pesticides in surface soils,
subsurface soils, and ground water in a number of areas throughout the complex, as well as in sediments of Sinclair
Inlet adjacent to the shipyard. Based on these results, the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) issued
separate administrative orders to the Naval Shipyard and the Naval Supply Center requiring the Navy to conduct
further studies of the contamination.
Sinclair Inlet provides a habitat for a variety of marine fishes, the most important being the salmonid species.
Commercial and recreational fishing, boating, and contact recreation occur in the inlet.
EPA, the Navy, and WDOE will negotiate a Federal Facilities Agreement under CERCLA Section 120 requiring
the Navy to investigate and remediate the site.
(The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was scored. The
description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56
FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.)
Superfund hazardous watt* til• Hstad under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) a* amended
-------
NPL-UH-7-f
National Priorities List
General Superfund Section, Proposed Rule Scores
Hay 1993
Route Scores
St site Name Location GU SW SE Air Total Notes*
AL
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
Florence
NS
66.61
NS
NS
33.50
CO
CO
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
Sunmitvi I le Mine
Denver
Rio Grande County
NS
NS
100.00
100.00
100.00
NS
NS
NS
70.71
SO. 00
fL
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
DeLand
100.00
NS
NS
NS
50.00
HI
Dei Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
Honolulu County
100.00
NS
NS
NS
50.00
10
ID
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
Lemhi County
Triurph
NS
51.33
100.00
100.00
NS
100.00
MS
100.00
50.00
90.33
MD
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Cecil County
72.51
16.95
NS
NS
37.23
MS
Potter Co.
Wesson
100.00
NS
NS
NS
50.00
NJ
Horseshoe Road
sayreville
23.57
100.00
N$
NS
51.37
HV
N*
Onondaga Lake
pfohl Brothers Landfill
Syracuse
Cheektowaga
MS
NS
100.00
100.00
NS
6.71
NS
NS
50.00
50.11
OH
CH
Diamond Shamrock Corp.(Painesvilie Work)
Dover Chemical Corp.
PainesviIle
Dover
NS
100.00
100.00
NS
N$
NS
NS
NS
50.00
50.00
OK
Notional Zinc Corp.
Sartlesville
NS
NS
100.00
NS
50.00
Oft
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr contain.
Multnomah County
100.00
NS
NS
NS
50.00
TN
ICG I set in Railroad Yard
Jackson
100.00
NS
NS
NS
SO.00
TX
HSR Corp.
Dallas
NS
NS
100.00
NS
50.00
UA
Pacific Sound Resources
Seattle
NS
100.00
NS
100.00
70.71
Number of Sites Being Proposed to the General Superfund Section: 19
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Tonic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, hRS score need not be > 28.SO).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score),
MS = Pathway Not Scored
Hay 1993
Page 1
-------
NPL-
O H
-1
'-2
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Proposed Rule #K Scores
Hay 1993
Route scores
St
Site Name
Location
GU
su
SE
Air
Total
KY
Padueah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
Padueah
54.51
100.00
NS
NS
54.95
MA
MA
Hansewn Air Force Base
Natick Laboratory Army Research,D&E Cntr
Bedford
Natlck
100.00
100.00
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
50.00
50.00
XD
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
Beltsvilie
NS
100.00
NS
NS
50.00
VA
VA
Lang ley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Hampton
Quant|co
MS
NS
100.00
100.00
NS
NS
NS
NS
50.00
50.00
UA
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
Bremerton
NS
100.00
NS
NS
50.00
Number of Sites Beina Proposed to the federal Facilities Section: 7
A - Based an issuance of health advisory by Agency /or Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HfiS scare need not be > 28.50).
S « Stato top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
US ° Pathway Not Scored
May 1993
Page 1
------- |