WORKING PAPER MO.
EPA-9>l©-§-7®-©98
WEESER-LOWEE PAYETTE
WATER QUALITY SURVEY
LOWER PAYETTE RIVER
MOUTH TO BLACK CANYON DAM RM 3&4
WE1SER RIVER
MOUTH TO TAMAKACK RM 100
AUGUST 1®75 amd DECEMBER 197
Regions X
Emwoisinniemftal Protections Agenscy
Smrveillaumce amdl Ansalysis Biviaiom
1200 Sktls Avenswe
Seattle^ WatMmgtom 98101
State off Mails©
Depairtmiseinitt off Health <& Welffare
Divisions off tftse EnsTOroisimseinit
StatefcioMse
Boise, Idaho 83720
-------
WEISER-LOWER PAYETTE WATER QUALITY SURVEYS
Lower Payette River
(Mouth to Black Canyon Dam RM 38.4)
Weiser River
(Mouth to Tamarack RM 100)
AUGUST 1975
and
DECEMBER 1975
Working Paper # EPA910/8-76-098
Prepared by D.R. Tangarone
3. Bogue
Region X
Environmental Protection Agency
Surveillance and Analysis Division
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Division of the Environment
Statehouse
Boise, Idaho 83720
-------
THIS DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC IN LIMITED
QUANTITIES THROUGH THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY, REGION X, SURVEILLANCE & ANALYSIS DIVISION,
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON.
2
-------
A WORKING PAPER PRESENTS RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS
WHICH ARE, TO SOME EXTENT, LIMITED OR INCOMPLETE.
THEREFORE, CONCLUSIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS EXPRESSED
OR IMPLIED MAY BE TENTATIVE.
3
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
INTRODUCTION 6
PURPOSE 6
FINDINGS 7
CONCLUSIONS 8
RECOMMENDATIONS 10
STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION 11
PREVIOUS STUDIES 15
SURVEY DESCRIPTION & METHODOLOGY 17
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 22
GRAPHICS 41
APPENDICES
A. COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORTS
B. QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
C. BIOLOGICAL DATA
D. 1971 WATER QUALITY DATA
E. 1975 SURVEY DATA
4
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NUMBERS
TITLE
PAGE NUMBER
1
2
PAYETTE WEISER
PAYETTE RIVER LOCATION MAP
WEISER RIVER LOCATION MAP
12
14
PAYETTE WEISER
3-4
29-30
FLOWS
42
68
5-6
31-32
TEMPERATURE/DISSOLVED OXYGEN/pH
44
70
7-S
51
DIURNAL DISSOLVED OXYGEN
46
90
9-10
33-34
BOD/TOC
48
72
11-12
35-36
T. PHOSPHOROUS/NO2+NO3/NH3
50
74
13-14
37-38
NO2+NO3 LOADINGS
52
76
15-16
39-40
T. PHOSPHOROUS LOADINGS
54
78
17-10
41-42
NH3 LOADINGS
56
SO
19-20
43-44
TOTAL & SUSPENDED SOLIDS/
58
82
CONDUCTIVITY/TURBIDITY
21-22 45-46 SUSPENDED SOLIDS LOADINGS 60 84
23-24 47-48 BACTERIOLOGICAL 62 86
25-26 49-50 FECAL COLIFORM TO FECAL STRIP RATIO 64 88
27 52 MACROINVERTEBRATE DIVERSITY INDEX 66 91
28 53 MACROINVERTEBRATE COUNT 67 92
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NUMBERS
PAYETTE WEISER
1
3-4
2
6-7
8
TITLE
SAMPLING STATIONS
AVERAGE STREAM & POINT SOURCE
LOADING CONTRIBUTIONS
BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
PAGE NUMBER
PAYETTE WEISER
18
25
30
20
34
38
5
-------
INTRODUCTION
In 1975, cooperative Idaho Department of Health and Welfare/Environ-
mental Protection Agency intensive water quality surveys were conducted
on the Weiser and Payette Rivers located in the Middle Snake River Basin
in Idaho during the summer irrigation season and higher flow non-irrigation
winter period to determine the effect of irrigation activities and point
source discharges upon water quality. The survey consisted of monitoring
stream water quality, sources relating to municipal, industrial and agri-
cultural activities, and biological populations at pre-determined locations
within each river sys.tem,
PURPOSE
The cooperative water quality surveys conducted in the Payette and
Weiser Rivers during August and December 1975 were designed to provide
information needed to:
- assess ambient water quality of the mainstream Payette and VJeiser
Rivers
- assess water quality of irrigation return flows
- determine the effect of irrigation return flows on instream water
quality
- determine the effect of point sources on water quality
- determine the NPDES compliance status of point sources located
within these study areas
- improve the data base during the irrigation and non-irrigation
seasons for support of current water quality modeling efforts
underway by the IDHW-DOE
6
-------
- determine the ambient water quality status with respect to state
water quality standards
FINDINGS
PAYETTE
1. Significant levels of Dissolved Oxygen supersaturation were
observed in the lower Payette River during the August survey.
2. Sixteen percent (16%) of the Nitrite plus Nitrate (NO2 + NO3)
and 13% of the total phosphorus contribution to the Payette
during August is attributable to the B Lateral drain.
3. Water quality standards for total and fecal coliforms were
violated in the lower 25 miles of the Payette River during the
August survey. These standards were also exceeded during the
December survey or non-irrigation period to a lesser degree.
4. Total and fecal coliform levels in the drains and tributaries
were observed to be considerably higher than at the mainstem
stations during both surveys.
5. Pesticide concentrations did not exceed the Water Quality Crite-
ria recommended levels at any time during the August or December
surveys.
6. The compliance monitoring evaluation for the city of New Plymouth
indicated that suspended solids and pH limitations were exceeded.
WEISER
1. During the irrigation season, nutrients, solids, total organic
carbon, conductivity, and turbidity levels increase dramatically
below the confluence of Crane Creek.
7
-------
2. Crane Creek was responsible for 84% of the suspended solids, 56%
of the ammonia (NH3 - N), 82% of the Nitrite and Nitrate (N0£ +
NO3 - N), and 79% of the total phosphorus contribution to the
Weiser River over the entire 100 mile reach under study during
the August survey. During the December survey, however, Crane
Creek exhibited very little impact on the Weiser River water
quality.
3. The compliance monitoring evaluation for Cambridge showed that
the city was operating within their permit limitations during
the survey.
4. Water quality standards for total and fecal coliforms were
exceeded during both surveys at many mainstem Weiser River
sampling stations. During August, approximately 20 miles of
the upper and 40 miles of the lower Weiser River violated the
fecal coliform standard. During December, nearly all of the
river was in violation of the standard (Figures 47 and 48).
5. Total coliform standards were exceeded in the upper and lower
portions of the Weiser (about 60 miles affected) during August
and generally in the lower 50 miles during December.
6. Total and fecal coliform densities of the drains and tributaries
were generally higher than concentrations found in the mainstem.
CONCLUSIONS
PAYETTE
1. During the irrigation season, nutrients, solids, conductivity,
turbidity, and bacterial levels increase substantially in the
8
-------
Payette River from Black Canyon Dam to the mouth, largely as
the result of irrigation activities.
2. Increased algal activity in the lower Payette River during
August is largely responsible for the observed high supersatu-
ration levels and substantial diurnal dissolved oxygen variations.
3. Fecal Coliform to Fecal Strep ratios indicate that bacterial
pollution is due primarily to animal sources. At some locations,
however, high FC/FS ratios definitely indicate the presence of
human sources of bacteria.
4. The macroinvertebrate diversity index determined for the Payette
River indicates that water quality gets poorer in the lower
reaches supporting a larger population of pollution tolerant
organisms.
WEISER
1. Waste loadings and resultant water quality effects are due almost
entirely from irrigation return flows and livestock activities.
2. FC/FS ratios were indicative of bacterial contributions primarily
from animal sources. In the vicinity of Tamarack and Cambridge,
however, ratios indicate possible human bacteria sources. At
some tributary locations, ratios also indicated the possibility
of human waste contamination.
3. Pesticide concentrations were very low throughout the study area.
No values exceeded recommended limits.
4. The biological diversity index shows a slight decline in the upper
60 miles of river, indicating some water quality deterioration over
this reach. Data is not available for the lower reaches of the
9
-------
river. At Tamarack, the biological community is dominated by
Hydropsychidae and Ephemeroptera, members of the pollution
sensitive group. The overall community structure suggests a
relatively clean environment. Above Midvale, however, organisms
of the pollution tolerant group are dominant suggesting moderate
to heavy water quality degradation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Additional biological monitoring efforts should be focused on the
lower reaches of the Payette and Weiser Rivers during the non-irri-
gation season.
2. In order to better define the bacterial sources and impacts, addi-
tional bacteriological investigations should be conducted in the
upper Weiser River in the vicinity of Tamarack.
3. Because of the large impact on Weiser River water quality due to
Crane Creek, the sources of nutrients and solids should be investi-
gated in the Crane Creek drainage to determine if these impacts can
be minimized in some way.
10
-------
STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
PAYETTE
The portion of the Payette River involved in the intensive water
quality surveys during August and December 1975 extended from just
below Black Canyon Dam (RM 38.4) to its mouth. The river reach and
surrounding drainage area (approximately 560 square miles - from
Emmett to Payette, Idaho) are shown on Figure 1.
Black Canyon Dam impounds a total of approximately 44,000 acre-
feet of storage with 1,100 acre-feet in active use. Flows below the
dam are regulated by diversion and gate operation. Based on streamflow
records for USGS Station No. 13251000, Payette River at Payette, Idaho,
the mean regulated flow is approximately 2,700 cfs and the minimum
regulated flow 1,400 cfs.
Irrigation efforts began in this area in 1863. Today, approximately
150,000 acres are under irrigation in the entire Payette River basin.
Of these, 45,000 acres, or thirty percent (30%), are located in the
Payette drainage area below Black Canyon Dam. Diversion rates are
about 6.5 acre-feet per acre with considerable reuse of return flow.
Virtually all irrigated lands in this area are supplied by the Payette
River. About 100 acres are irrigated by groundwater withdrawals.
Average annual rainfall in the Payette-Weiser vicinity is approx-
imately 11.5 inches.
Point sources in the Payette study area consist of the discharges
from the cities of Emmett, New Plymouth, Fruitland, and Payette. Al-
though there are no industrial discharges directly entering the Payette
11
-------
A SAMfilNO STATIONS (AUOVST ft OICIM«(«)
A $AMfLINO STATIONS (AUOUIT ONIY)
O 'LOW MlASURIMINf ONIT
FIGURE I
LOWER PAYETTE RIVER, IDAHO
SAMPLING STATIONS
AUGUST/DECEMBER 1975
-------
River within the study area, some industrial loading is exerted on the
Payette Sewage Treatment Plant (STP).
Above Black Canyon Dam, water quality by visual observation is
far superior aesthetically to that observed in the lower basin.
Irrigation return flows significantly affect water quality and cause
noticeable increases in turbidity.
WEISER
Weiser River study area is shown on Figure 2. The drainage
area in the study reach (1,600 square miles) includes virtually all
of the Weiser River basin. There are only 40 square miles of drainage
area above the community of Tamarack, Idaho, the upper boundary of
the study area.
Lower Weiser River flows are regulated by Crane Creek Reservoir
(51,000 acre-feet capacity, nearly all of which is active) and other
smaller impoundments. Based on USGS stream flow records for the
Weiser River at Weiser, (RM 15.1) the mean regulated flow is approx-
imately 1,000 cfs and the minimum regulated flow is about 425 cfs.
Approximately 30,400 acres are presently irrigated in the Weiser
River basin. Another 100,000 acres are potentially irrigable but
additional storage is required for their development. Present
irrigation patterns consist of many narrow farmland strips along
smaller drainages. Diversions are made from these tributaries when
stream flows are available.
Water rights have been adjudicated on the Weiser River and its
tributaries. The primary water use is for irrigation.
13
-------
-------
Average rainfall In the Weiser area is 11.3 inches. Consid-
erably more precipitation occurs in the higher elevations.
Point waste sources in the Weiser River basin include the towns
of Council (RM 66) and Cambridge (RM 46). Tamarack (RM 95), Fruit-
land (RM 76), Goodrich (RM 57), and Midvale (RM 36) do not have
collection systems and the City of Weiser discharges treated wastes
to the Snake River. Agriculture and cattle raising are the primary
land uses in the basin.
PREVIOUS STUDIES
Very few water quality oriented studies have been conducted in the
Payette or Weiser River drainage basins. Those available are cited here
along, with a brief summary of findings.
1. Water Resources Study, Weiser Project, Weiser River Basin, DHEW,
USPHS, Region IX, Portland, Oregon, March 1963.
Although no water quality data is presented, reference to
water quality is made in the following excerpt:
"High nutrients, which contribute to algal blooms
in the lower Weiser River, the Snake River and
Brownlee Reservoir on the Snake River are asso-
ciated with the irrigation return flows."
2. Water Investigations of Snake River and Principal Tributaries
from Walters Ferry to Weiser, Idaho, USEPA, National Field
Investigations Center - Denver (NFIC-D), Denver, Colorado
and Region X, Seattle, Washington, February 1973.
15
-------
Based upon a stream survey conducted during the period
November 4-10, 1971, the Payette River below Emmett was
found to be of good quality. Downstream from river mile
4.1, however, total coliform densities showed a significant
increase. Chemical quality in this area was relatively
good.
In summary, "The Payette River was of good quality
and did not cause violations of water quality standards in
the Snake River."
"The Weiser River at its mouth was relatively unpol-
luted. The river bottom consisted of rocks and occasional
silt deposits."
The data obtained during this survey for the Payette
and Weiser River is presented in the appendix.
3. Southwest Idaho Water Management Study, July 1975, U.S. Bureau
of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region, Boise, Idaho.
Water quality data were collected during the period
1968-1975 as a part of the USBR's investigation of
various units of the potential Garden Valley Divison.
The Payette River near the mouth was generally of high
chemical quality but bacterial densities in the lower
reaches frequently exceeded state standards. Total
coliform counts near the mouth averaged 11683/100 ml
during the irrigation season in 1973 and 810/100 ml
in 1974. Noil-irrigation, season levels of TC or FC
16
-------
organisms were not as high, but averages still exceeded
standards.
- Irrigated agriculture including feedlots and other farm
operations must be considered the major factor in most
of the degradation of Payette River water quality which
occurs. "Improvement of existing conditions is possible
if more of the return flows with their higher concentra-
tion of potentially detrimental material are pumped into
existing canals and reused for irrigation instead of
being allowed to return directly to the river."
SURVEY DESCRIPTION AND METHODOLOGY
Intensive water quality surveys of the Payette and Weiser Rivers were
conducted during both the irrigation and non-irrigation seasons (August
and December 1975).
Sampling stations established for both the August and December surveys
are presented on Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 2. All significant irri-
gation return flows and diversions were sampled along with selected main-
stem river stations.
Compliance monitoring inspections of the significant point sources
within both basins were performed by the Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare (IDHW), Division of the Environment, during the August survey.
The reports associated with these inspections are included in the Appendix.
Flow determinations for returns, diversions, and many main-stem sta-
tions were made by direct gaging procedures during both surveys. Where
available (Figures 1 and 2), USGS gages were read and flows then determined
17
-------
TABLE 1
Page 1
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
SAMPLING STATIONS
ANALYSIS PERFORMED
STA. AVG. ¦
STORET NO. STATION R.M. SAMPLED FLOW* FIELD NUTRIENTS BACTERIA SOLIDS CHtOR-A PESTICIDES BOD
8/75
12/75
8/75
12/75
8/75
12/75
8/75
12/75
8/75
12/75
8/75
12/75 8/75
12/75 8/75
12/75 8/75
153681
Payette R bl Black Canyon Dam 38.4
X
X
2121
2675
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
Last Chance Canal
37.2
112
0
153682
Frozen Dog Drain
35.0
X
X
9
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Farmers Co-op Canal
34.2
439
0
1S3683
Payette R. SEnnett (Hwy 52)
33.3
X
X
1450
2675
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
133756
Eninett STP
31.3
X
X
9
2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Enterprise Canal
30.5
77
0
153584
Haw Creek
30.3
X
X
18
5
&
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Sevenmile Slough
29.4
519
82
153687
Bissel Creek
25.2
X
X
4
3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
153685
Tunnel No. 7
25.1
X
X
31
10
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1536S6
Payette R. @ Letha Bridge
25.0
X
X
1009
2958
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
153732
Orain 0 West Hanna Road
22.4
X
X
X
X
X
X
153733
Hanna Drain
21.3
X
X
21
20
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
153734
Drain-N. Side Payette R.
21.0
X
1
X
X
X
X
X
153735
Sand Hollow 3 MI NW of Letha
20.6
X
10
X
X
X
X
X
153683
Sevenmile Slough
20.0
X
X
156
159
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
-------
STORE! NO.
STATIQH
R.H.
STA.
SAKPLEO
8/75 12/75
153633
Farr-ers Co-op kasteway
19.4
X
X
153736
Drain E. Side Payette S.
18.5
X
153690
Pdyette R. 8 Falk 3r'dge
Slough- to Big Willow Creek
13.0
16.4
X
X
153691
B Lateral
16.0
X
X
1S369Z
Drain nr Hamilton Corner
15.7
X
X
153706
Drain- S.side Payette R.
15.3
X
X
153693
Payette R. nr ,\ew Plymouth
Hwy 52
14.1
X
X
153739
Drain- S.Side Payette R.
13.41
X
153740
Orain- S.Side Payette R.
13.4
X
153694
Payette R. C-Willow Cr. Rd. Br. 12.8
X
X
153695
Cemetery Brain
12.4
X
X
153755
tleu Plymouth STP
10.9
X
X
153696
Drain- 5. Sank Palette R.
9.9
X
15374B
Drain- K.Side Payette S.
9.8
X
153697
Drain- S.Sice Payette R.
9.7
X
X
153698
Drain- S.Side Payette R.
9.6
X
X
153699
Drain- S.SIde Payette R.
9.3
X
153745
Els Mi How Cjeek.
8.4
X
X
153747
Drain- S.Side Payette R.
7.5
X
X
153700
Drain 2 11 £. Fruit)and
7.3
X
X
153701
Sand Hollow nr Payette
5.4
X
X
153702
Fan&ers Ditch
Washoe Ditch
4.4
4.4
X
153703
Payette S. 6 Payette (Hwy 95] 4.1
X
X
153753
fruitland STP
3.9
X
X
153704
Payette R. S Payette (Kiwanis
Park) 2.1
X
X
1537 05
Fortynlne Slough at Kiwanls
Park
2.0
X
X
153752
Payette STP
1.0
X
X
153741
Payette R. 100 ft blw
Payette STP
1.0
X
X
TABLE 1 (cont)
P»Rt 2
ANALYSIS PtftFORXED
AVG.
FLOW FIELD taiTUTfNTS iiACTtRIA SOLIDS CHLOR-A PESTICIDES 603
3/75 12/75 0/75 12/75 3/75 32/75 S/75 12/75 8/75 32/75 S/75 12/75 B/75 12/75 8/75 12/75
82xxxxxxxx xxxx
7 . xxx x x xxxx
1210 3150 xx kk xx xx xx xx xx
257
119 38 x x x x x x x x xx xx
<0 15 xx xx xx xx x
93xx xx x xx
1315 3 580 xxxxxxxx x
3 xxx X x
17 xxx X x
1297 3530 xx xx xx xx xxxx x x
40 28 xx xx x xx
1.2 .2» xxxxxxxx x xx
4 x x x x
xxx x x
17 3 x x x x x
8 0.5 x x x x xx
10 x x x x
113 339 x x x x x x x x x x
59 3* xx xx xx x
35 3 x x x x xx
S0 3xxxxxxx xxxx
23 0 x x x x x x
45 0
1533 2375 xx xxxxxx x x
0.2 0.1 xxxxxxxx x xx
1510 2875 xx xx xx xxxx xxxx
2S5xxxx xxxx x xx
3 2 x xxxxx xx xx
x x
-------
STORET NO.
static;;
R.M.
STA.
SAMPLED
B/75 12/75
153718
Weiser R. & Tanaraci^ Hwy 95 55.6
X
153719
k'eistr R. 3 USGS Gauge #2515 94.5
X
X
Diversion- East Side
78.8
diversion- East Side
77.4
153720
Weiser R. & Fruitva^e
76.9
X
X
153721
W. Fork Weiser R.&Co. Rd. Br.76.2
X
X
153722
Reiser R. Q Council
6S.8
X
X
153723
Hornet Creek 9 Council
63-6
X
X
153749
Council STP
66.0
X
X
153724
K.F. Kelser @ HWV 95 Bridge
63.2
X
X
153725
Weiser R. @ Goodrich
57.2
X
X
153726
Weiser R. & USGS Gauge #2555 50.3
X
X
153785
Cambridge STP
46.0
X
X
153728
Mne Cr. nr Cambridge
45.3
X
X
153727
Little WeUer R. nr Canbridge45.0
X
X
153729
Weiser R. nr Cambridge
Diversion- East Sfcie
44.9
42.7
X
X
153707
Weiser ft. ab tfidvale
41.7
X
X
153709
Keithly Cr. nr tfldvale,
Hwy 9$
37.3
X
X
153709
Weiser R. 9 Midvale
36.4
X
X
153710
Cr&ne Creek
36.7
X
X
153711
Weiser ft, &U5GS Gaype #2660
' Sunr.yside Canal
Galloway Canal
15.1.
14.1
13.2
X
X
153712
Weiser R. ab Weiser
8.1
X
X
153713
Mann Creek
Dfversion-Korth Side
6.8
6.1
X
X
153715
Lower Payette Ditch
2.1
X
153714
Weiser R. ab Weis&r
1.9
X
X
153717
Uetser R. £ Vtelser, iWy 95
0.8
X
X
153716
Hocir« Creek
0.6
X
X
TABLE 2
WEISER RIVER SURVEY
SAMPLING STATIONS
analysis performed
AVG.
FLOW FIELD .'.UTRIEIiTS BACTERIA SOLIDS CHLCR-A "PESTICIDES EOD
8/75 12/7$ S/75 12/75 8/75 12/75 8/75 12/75 0/75 12/75 S/75 12/75 8/75 12/75 8/75 12/75
8
19
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8
19
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
7
0
10
0
7
98
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
26
32
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
41
250
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
>0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0,5
0.2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
46
2>3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
104
595
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
100
5£5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0.1
0.2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
13
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
337
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
124
917
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
70
0
55
920
X
X.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
72
920
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
195
19
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
293
390
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
48
0
200
0
86
S9Q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
13
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
a
0
14
0
X
X
X
X
X
X
ICS
951
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
110
970
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X x
X
X
&
21
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
using updated rating curves. At selected stations flow was considered to
remain constant during the survey period, therefore, only one flow deter-
mination by direct gaging was made.
Laboratory analyses included Biochemical Oxygen Demand, nutrients,
solids, bacteria, pesticides, chlorophyll-A, and biological (species,
diversity index). Measurements for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen
(DO), alkalinity, and conductivity were taken in the field. The IDHW
laboratory in Boise analyzed the 5-day BOD samples for the August survey
and all solids analyses associated with the December survey. All other
laboratory analyses were performed by the EPA Region X Seattle laboratory.
All samples were collected in clean, unused polyethelene containers.
Bacteriological samples were collected in sterile, glass containers.
Samples were preserved as required according to EPA "Methods for Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes" and refrigerated during, shipment via air
transportation to the Seattle laboratory. EPA analytical methods were
utilized.
Attempts were made to sample all main-stem stations and most major
returns for three consecutive days during August. Some Payette River
stations could only be practicably reached by shallow draft jet boat.
Due to low water conditions and equipment malfunctions, a number of the
smaller drains were not sampled. No attempt was made to sample any of
the Weiser River stations using the jet boat. Diurnal dissolved oxygen
variations were measured in the lower Payette and Weiser Rivers during
the August survey. A Hydrolab automatic water quality analyzer was uti-
lized to obtain the continuous data and located at the Payette STP approx-
imately 100 feet downstream from the point of effluent discharge.
21
-------
The December sampling effort on both the Payette and Weiser Rivers was
limited to one station sampling visitation during the survey period due to
manpower and fiscal restrictions. Selected main-stem stations were sampled
in duplicate or triplicate to assure adequate definition of the analytical
results. Very few return drains were sampled during the December survey
since flows were either non-existent or insignificant.
The macroinvertebrate community in the Weiser and Payette Rivers was
sampled using rock-filled basket-type artificial substrate samplers. The
samplers were in place for approximately two months during the summer of
1975 to allow time for the biological community to develop. In analyzing
the macroinvertebrate community, the taxonomic orders or families were
divided into three groups according to their tolerance to pollution, fol-
lowing the grouping outlined by Beak."'' Group 1 includes the orders the
species of which are generally intolerant to water pollution. In Group 2
are the orders in which the majority of species are facultative. Group 3
includes the most pollution tolerant species. Conclusions were drawn
from the relative abundance of each group in the community.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
PAYETTE SURVEY
Streamflows during August (Figure 3) were relatively low. For
the Payette River at Payette (USGS Gage No. 13251000) flows averaged
1713 cfs or about 20% higher than the historical modified mean dis-
charge (1929-1958) for August.
^ Beak, T.W. "A Biotic Index of Polluted Streams and its Relationship to
Fisheries" August 1964.
22
-------
Canals were flowing full and return flows were entering the
Payette in its lower reaches. Seven Mile Slough, B Lateral, Drain
RM 15.3, Cemetary Drain, Big Willow Creek, and Sand Hollow contri-
buted 30% of the total Payette River flow observed at Payette (RM 4.1).
Flows decreased 15% from Black Canyon Dam (avg. 2121 cfs) to Payette
(avg. 1713 cfs) due to irrigation diversions.
December flows (Figure 4) averaged 2875 cfs at Payette or 107.
greater than the historical modified mean December discharge (1928—
1958) of 1618 cfs. Canals were shut off and most returns were either
not flowing or had substantially reduced flow.
Figures 5 and 6 present Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and
pH data for the August and December surveys. Temperatures gradually
increase over the reach and generally reflect the climatic conditions
experienced during each survey. Dissolved oxygen levels increase in
the lower river during August, reflecting the effect of increased
algal activity. This is dramatically supported by the percent satu-
ration curve also shown on Figure 5. In the lower 15 miles of river,
DO percent saturation levels increased to 135%. During December DO
concentrations were within 15 percent of saturation values (Figure 6)
in the entire reach but did show some reduction in the lower portion
of the river. The pH determinations made during both surveys were
well within state water quality standards. Figures 7 and 8 show the
24 hour diurnal DO variations observed on the lower Payette River.
A definite sag of more than 4 mg/1 in DO is noted in the August data
with the low values dipping below the Idaho DO standard line of 6 mg/1
for about a two hour period. This reduction may be the result of the
23
-------
near proximity to the STP discharge combined with algal respiration.
The high percent saturation levels (Figure 5) in the lower river
would indicate that algal respiration is the primary cause of the
reduction in DO during the evening hours. No discernable diurnal
variation was observed during the December survey.
BOD5 and BOD20 (Figures 9 and 10) concentrations are generally
low throughout the study reach. BOD5 concentrations were essentially
the same during both the August and December surveys, again suggesting
that algal respiration and not the Payette STP discharge is the
primary cause of the observed DO depression. BOD20 concentrations
also show general agreement. In the lower reaches during December,
BOD20 concentrations increase, reflecting the effect of organic
loading to the river from the towns of Emmett, New Plymouth, Fruit-
land, and Payette (Figure 10).
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) concentrations (Figure 9) increase
over the study reach reflecting the increase in algal activity.
Nutrient concentrations and loadings are presented on Figures 11
through 18. The primary contributors of Nutrients and Suspended Solids
(SS) to the Payette River are presented in Tables 3 and 4. During both
August and December, Nitrite plus Nitrate (NO2 + NO3) concentrations
as well as conductivity levels (Figure 19), show significant increases
in the lower 20 miles of river indicating some evidence of runoff
from fields through groundwater. Concentrations were generally higher
during the December survey. Total phosphorus concentrations also
increase significantly in the lower river during both surveys. Total
phosphorus concentrations during December are generally lower than
24
-------
Table 3
LOWER PAYETTE RIVES.
AVERAGE STREAM ANT) POINT SOURCE LOADINGS
AUGUST 4-8, 1975
StOREI
NO
MAISST5M STATIONS
DRAIN'S/DIVERSIONS/
MUNICIPAL SOURCES
153631 Payette S, Slv Black Canyon Dan Ab Esoecc
* Liec Chance Canal
153622 Frozen Dog Drain
* Fartaers Coop Canal
153683 Payette &. Q Ecaett
153756 EnrageC ST?
* Ducrprit»
Cn
* Slough co Big Willow Creek
153691 B Lateral
153692 Drain N'r Hamilton Co?m«r
153706 Drain-South Side
153693 Payatte JL JJr Saw Plysouti"., £w7 52
* Johnson Ditch
153739 Drain-South Side
153740 Drain-South Side
*53694 p«y#«t *. 8 VUlow Cr- Rd. sr.
153655
153755
153656
153657
153698
153699
J53745
153747
153700
153701
153702
*
Otaecery Drain
New Ply-outh STP
Drain-South Side
priin-South Side
Drain-South Sida
Drain-South Side
Big Willow Creek
Drain-South Sida
Dr*i^-South Slip
Sand Holloy
Parser# Pitch
Washoe Ditch
1537Q3 ?«y*te* R. $ Payette (Kwy 95>
153753 PruitUnd STP
153704 P«y«ttt R- § Payette (fcivanis Park)
153705 Fortyniqe Slough
153753 Payette STP
SUSPENDED SOLIDS
SH3-N
K02+N03-:;
TOTAL 2
>HCS?HC?v,"<
Rivsa
2 TOTAL
2 TOTAL
2 TOTAL
: total
KILE
g/DAY
INPUT
tf/DAY
IN*PUT
#/DAY
' INPUT
#/5AY
INPUT
38.4
64,500
215
<108
260
37.2
(->3,650
(->1-5
(->10
(->3.3
(->6
(->15
(->1.7
35.0
745
—
2
50
2.5
13
1.5
34.2
(-011,850
(->4.8
(->31
(->10.2
(->24
(->1.2
(->64
(->7.3
33,3
39,150
85
85
230
31.3
860
10
3.3
16
29
3. 3
30.5
(->2, WO
W1.2
(-)5
(->1.7
(-)6
(-)U
(->1.6
30.3
6,125
2.5
3
1.0
10
20
2.3
29.4
(->19,600
(•>8.0
(->36
(->11.9
(-)42
(-)2.1
(->92
(->10.5
25.2
5,560
2.3
1
14
10
1.1
25.1
3,015
1*2
3
1.0
17
18
2.0
25.0
54,500
54
109
207
21.3
26,875
10.9
2
.
57
2.S
35
4.0
21.0
790
1
—
3
—
K
>i
20.6
3,730
1.5
2
—
15
10
1.1
20.0
7,600
3.1
8
2.6
8
46
5.2
19.4
315
1
S
5
18.9
26,075
10.9
2
22
1.1
24
2.7
18.0
65,350
65
196
365
16.4
(->15,500
t-;6.3
(-) 16
(->5.3
(->45
(->2.2
(-> 65
(->9.7
16.0
18,570
7.6
13
4;3
320
15.9
115
13.1
15.7
10,420
4.2
9
3-0
195
9.7
4S
5.1
15.3
845
¦1"
1
_
19
—
9
l.Q
14-1
73,700
57
570
490
13-7
i-)2f9QQ
t-H-2
(->3
(-31.0
<-)21
(->1.0
<->18
£->2.0
13.41
200
—
1
—
3
—
4
13,4
9,525
3,9
2
—
73
3.6
24
2-7
12,8
98fQ5Q
113
700
610
12.4
12,065
4.9
7
2.3
172
8.6
40
4.5
1Q.9
160
—
1
a
K
7
0.9
1.145
I
56
2.8
7
.
9.;
8,915
3-6
2
130
6.5
30
3.4
e.&
1,095
—
3
1.0
52
2.6
14
1.6
8.3
8,800
3.6
2
—
76
3.8
22
2.5
8.4
12,815
5.2
12
4,0
24
1.2
73
3.3
7.5
46,830
19.1
26
8.6
290
14.4
S3
6.1
7,3
17,000
6,9
62
20,5
170
8.5
50
5.7
5?4
8,820
3,6
8
2-6
160
8.0
45
5.1
4,4
2,845
1,2
4
1,1
12
•—
12
1-4
4.4
<->3,650
(->1,5
M6
(*)2.Q
(-W
(->2,4
(-)24
(->2-7
4*1
124,200
250
1,490
800
3,9
30
—
1
—
N
H
3
—
2,3
122,300
325
1,300
775
2,0
1,535
—
3
1.0
29
1.4
17
1.9
1.0
1,460
110
36,3
V
N
75
P. 5
?ooc«otM;
Plow ffcasureaent only; Leading* baaed upoa concentration found *t noareet conparabl® MlMtes • tat ion.
Lesa than 1Z or li/Day,
So data Available,
-------
.able- 4
N3
On
STQF.ET
153681
MAINS / D ivinsioss /
AMXSTSM STATIONS MUNICIPAL SOURCES
Payette 2. Blw Black Canyon Sac Ab Inmate
* Last Chance Canal
153662 Frozen Dog Drain
* Farcers Coop Canal
153683 Payette &. 8 Euactt ,
153756 Eaaett STP
* Enterprise Caaal
153684 Hiw Creak
* £«vonnlle Slough
153587 Bissel Creek
153685 Tunnel Ho. 7
15 3686 Payesre &. 6 Lath* Bridge
152733 Oanna Drain
153731. Drain-ivorch. Side
153735 Sand Hollow (KW of Lath*}
153636 Sevensnile Slough
15 3663 Faracrs Coo? Waateway
153736 Drain-East Side
153690 ?ay«cte k» $ calk Bridge
153693 Payette £. Sr Sew Plymouth, Svy 52
* Johnson Ditch
153739 Drain-South Sido
153740 Drain-South Side
LOWER PAYETTE RIVER
, STREAK AI.'D POINT SOURCE LOADISCS1
DECEMBER 2-4, 1975
SUSPENDED SOLIDS
Slough co Big Willow Cxeek
153691 9 Lateral
152652 Drain Hr Haailtoa Corner
153706 Drain-South Side
RIVER
HILE
38.4
37.2
35.0
34.2
33.3
31.3
30.5
30.3
29.4
25.2
25.1
25:0
21.3
21.0
20 ,6
20.0
15.4
18.9
18.0
16.4
16.0
15.7
15.3
14.1
13.7
13.42
13.4
: TOTAL
*/DAY INPUT
49,700
102
24,900
337
1.100
S6.
1,350
79,SCO
3,350
204,130
5,350
1.620
65
193,300
1.6
5.2
6,000 28.3
65
25.2
7.6
KK3-K
2 TOTAL
g/DAY _IN?'JT
750
5.9 4.1
640
3.2 2.2
<5
<3.5
340
2.1 1.5
190
N'02+K33->:
Z TOTA
¦V2AY INPUT
2,700
670
23 1.4
1,000
40 2.4
29 1.7
1,600
240 14.3
100 6.0
2,040
175 10.4
155 9.2
TOTAL PSO
/lay i:c?it
335
275
1.2
6
4
5 1.2
465
33 5.5
32 4.6
560
37
12
1.6
640
5.3
1.7
153694 Payette R. 6 Willow Cr. ltd. Br.
153G95
153755
15 3SOr,
15 J 7.- 7
153692
153693
153745
*153747
153700
153701
153702
Cc&etery Drain
Kew Plymouth ST?
Drain-South Side
Druin-SoutU SIdj
Drain-South Side
Drain-South Side
Din Willow Creek
Drain-Souch Sida
Drain-South Side
Sand Hollow
Purser* Ditch
Ha«Uoe Ditch
153703
Pa/ecu 5.. @ Payette
-------
August except at the lower two sampling stations. Big Willow Creek
is seen to contribute a substantial Total phosphorus load (Figure 16)
during December and probably is responsible for much of the observed
concentration increases. Marked differences were observed in ammonia
concentrations. For August, concentrations increase from about 0.015
mg/1 below Black Canyon Dam to about 0.040 mg/1 near the mouth. During
December, however, levels decrease from about 0.06 mg/1 to less than
0.01 mg/1 at the mouth. The August increase may be due to the buildup
of ammonia contributions from the numerous returns and drains in the
lower reaches more rapidly than the utilization rate. Conversely,
the significant decline may be due to the utilization of available
ammonia combined with greatly reduced ammonia inputs to the river.
Calculated loadings (#/day) of NO2 + NO3 (Figures 13 and 14)
increase substantially in the lower river during August due to the
contributions of the numerous return drains. Loadings also show
substantial increases during the December survey and are considerably
greater throughout the study reach. This is due to the higher
streamflow conditions encountered which were scouring sediments and
nutrients from the bedload. The primary sources of NO2 + NO3 are
shown on Figures 13 and 14, and in Tables 3 and 4. As noted on
Table 3, the primary sources of NO2 + NO3 during the August survey
are the B Lateral drain (15.9%) and a drain at RM 7.5 (14.4%).
These two sources accounted for 30% of the total Nitrogen input to
the river in the study reach. During the December survey, however
(Table 4), these same two drains only accounted for 13% of the total
27
-------
input. Major input during December shifted to Hanna Drain (14.3%),
B Lateral (10.4%), Cemetary Drain (19.9%), and Big Willow Creek
(17.3%).
Total phosphorus loadings (Figures 15 and 16) increase signifi-
cantly during both the irrigation season and the higher flow winter
survey. The B Lateral drain is the highest contributor during the
August survey (13%). During December, however, Big Willow Creek
accounted for 71% of the total phosphorus input.
Ammonia loadings observed during August (Figure 17) closely fol-
low the concentration curve (Figure 11). After an initial reduction
in NH^ load just below Black Canyon Dam, probably due to more rapid
oxidation rates in this upper reach, loadings again increase in the
lower fifteen miles where the primary sources of NH3 enter the river.
Almost 30% of the total NH3 loading to the river is contributed by
two drains at RM 7.5 and KM 7.3. December loadings (Figure 18)
generally follow the concentration curve (Figure 12) and show a
marked reduction in NH3 load over the reach. Big Willow Creek is
the prime contributor of NH3 load during December (12.5%).
Suspended Solids (SS) concentrations (Figures 19 and 20) increased
from 5 mg/1 below Black Canyon Dam to about 15 mg/1 at Payette in
August at the same time that river flows (Figure 3) decreased in the
study reach. This indicates that irrigation returns and drains were
primarily responsible for the increase in the suspended solids concen-
trations. During December, concentrations increased to more than 125
mg/1 at Payette due to greater scouring from the increased stream
flows. Significant suspended solids loading contributions are clearly
28
-------
seen in Figures 21 and 22. Total Solids, Turbidity, and Conductivity
(Figures 19 and 20) increase over the same reach for both surveys.
This is also supportive of non-point source contributions, particu-
larly during the August period, and of scouring from increased stream-
flows during December.
Bacterial levels (Figures 23 and 24) were observed to increase
during both surveys. Total Coliform (TC) and Fecal Coliform (FC)
water quality standards were exceeded during August for all samples
analyzed in the lower 25 miles of the Payette. This was also generally
the case during the December survey except for two stations in the
lower 15 miles. Total Coliform concentrations generally exceeded
standards in the lower 25 miles while Fecal Coliforms concentrations
exceeded standards in the lower 15 miles. The towns of New Plymouth,
Fruitland, and Payette discharge treated domestic effluent in this
reach and are believed to be a significant factor in these increased
bacterial concentrations. Bacteriological data are also presented
on Table 5.
Figures 25 and 26 show the relationship of fecal coliform to
fecal streptococci bacteria. Large fecal strep densities represent
bacteria from agricultural sources and low fecal strep densities
associated with higher fecal coliform densities represent evidence
of domestic sources of bacteria. A FC/FS ratio of 2.0 or greater
suggests a predominance of human wastes in mixed pollution while a
ratio of 0.7 or less strongly suggests animal sources of bacteria.
A ratio between 1.0 and 2.0 indicates an uncertain bacteria source.
29
-------
TABLE 5
PAYETTE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
GEOMETRIC MEAHS
AUGUST DECEMBER
STATION
RIVER
TOTAL
FECAL
FECAL
TOTAL
FECAL
FECAL
NO
STATION HAME
MILE
COLIFORM
C0LIF0RM
STREP
C0LIF0RM
couform
STREP
153681
Payette R bl Black Canyon Dam
38.4
20
7
10
40
25
60
153632 '
Frozen Dog Drain
35.0
2150
130
1050
550
15
700
153683
Payette R Q Emnett
33.3
120
22
35
110
<10
18
153756
Enroett STP
31.3
490
100
75
60
<10
40
153684
Haw Creek
30.3
5000
1850
3000
290
30
1600
153687
Blssel Creek
25.2
—
—
—
68
36
350
153635
Tunnel No. 7
25.1
1440
560
1150
1000
390
210
153686
Payette R @ Letha Br
25.0
280
65
340
2 B0
48
62
153732
Drain @ W Hanna Rd
22.4
4400
1300
1600
—
—
—
153733
Hanna Drain
21.3
5100
1400
2500
1700
1100
11000
153734
Drain
21.0
1100
270
860
—
—
—
153735
Sand Hollow
20.6
2300
470
1700
<10
<10
60
153688
Sevenmile Slough.
20.0
425
240
300
320
320
210
153689
Farcers CO-OP Wasteway
19.4
2300
360
1000
90
6
110
153736
Drain
18.4
4400
3500
—
—
—
—
153690
Payette R @ Falk Br
18.0
400
140
550
460
26
74
153691
B Lateral
16.0
1700
440
725
650
510
400
153692
Drain - Hamilton Corner
15.7
340
98
370
200
70
110
153706
Drain
15.3
—
—
—
220
220
220
153693
Payette R Nr Hew Plymouth
14.1
500
180
640
72
66
170
153739
Drain
13.42
3600
1900
2700
—
—
—
153740
Drain
13.4
4900
2400
3700
—
—
—
153694
Payette R @ Willow Cr Rd Br
12.8
320
170
700
70
48
120
153695
Cenetary Drain
12.4
—
—
—
220
98
160
153755
New Plymouth STP
10.9
170
120
150
<10
<10
60
153748
Drain
9.8
4000
2300
6900
—
—
—
153698
Drain
9.6
—
—
—
1500
330
4600
153745
Big Willow Creek
8.4
640
260
580
560
390
760
153747
Drain
7.5
3800
1300
3200
4800
2500
7000
153700
Drain
7.3
—
—
—
170
130
1400
15 3 701
Sand Hollow
5.4
2500
700
4000
530
150
180
153702
Farmers Ditch
4.4
1100
400
2050
—
—
—
153703
Payette R @ Payette
4.1
360
240
S50
4200
130
710
153753
Fruitland STP
3.9
73
30
60
10000
1700
520
153704
Payette R @ Payette (Kiuanis Pk)
2.1
550
160
650
7300
300
520
153705
Fortynine Slough
2.0
2945
575
2525
14200
'.850
1400
153752
Payette STP
1.0
115
50
150
610
25
130
August 5—7, 1975 and Deceaber 2-4, 1975
-------
However, this does not mean that bacteria from domestic waste is
not present, only that there is a predominance of animal waste.
The FC/FS ratios of 0.3 determined during August for the entire
Payette River reach strongly indicates a livestock oriented source
of bacteria. This is also the case during the December survey where
mainstem FC/FS ratios are also very low. It may be noted, however,
that a few of the drains or returns to the Payette in the lower area
show ratios of 4 and 8 which strongly suggest the entry of human
wastes into these drains by direct discharge or septic tank drainage.
WEISER SURVEY
Streamflows encountered during the surveys are shown on Figures
29 and 30. Flows measured at the USGS Gage (Station No. 13266000),
Weiser River at Weiser (RM 15.1), averaged 287 cfs during the August
survey period. The 30 year mean August flow (1928-1958) for this
station is 203 cfs. During December, flows averaged 990 cfs at this
location or 70% greater than the 1928-1958 December mean discharge
of 581 cfs.
During the August survey, canals were flowing full and irrigation
returns were discharging to the river. Crane Creek, the major tribu-
tary in the lower Weiser basin, contributed nearly 70% of the total
flow as measured at the USGS Gage No. 13266000 at River Mile 15.1. At
the same time, the Galloway and Sunnyside canals were diverting nearly
90% of the total Weiser flow below Crane Creek.
Temperature, pH, and Dissolved Oxygen concentrations are shown in
Figures 31 and 32. Temperatures increase gradually over most of the
31
-------
upper Weiser River during August. Below Crane Creek, however, tem-
peratures are considerably reduced due to cold water being discharged
from Crane Creek reservoir. In August, a reduction in dissolved
oxygen is observed between the uppermost station (RM 95), located
just above Tamarack and the Evergreen Forest Products log pond, and
the next station downstream, located at USGS Gage No. 13251500 (0.5
miles downstream from Tamarack). The reduction may be caused by
organic loading in this area from the log pond and/or possible septic
tank drainages. Dissolved oxygen saturation is observed to gradually
increase to the Midvale area where levels reach 135 percent satura-
tion. This is somewhat indicative of increasing algal activity
although additional factors such as increasing water temperatures
and natural turbulence may also significantly contribute to the
observed high levels. Percent saturation declines below the into-
duction of Crane Creek. In the lower river, saturation levels again
increase.
DO concentrations were very close to saturation levels during
December. A reduced level in the Tamarack area may again be indica-
tive of organic loading in this area. The increase observed in the
lower river may be attributable to reaeration occurring at the
Sunnyside and Galloway canal diversion dam. Attempts were made to
obtain diurnal DO data on the lower Weiser River. Equipment malfunc-
tions, however, prevented this. The pH data presented are seen to be
well within the state water quality standards limits during both
surveys.
32
-------
August BOD concentrations (Figure 33) are relatively low through-
out the entire river. BOD^ in the vicinity of Tamarack however, is
higher than measured in other reaches and thus correlates well with
the reduced dissolved oxygen values observed here. It also supports
the possibility that organic loading is occurring in this area. Decem-
ber BOD values (Figure 34) are somewhat higher than those observed
during August. In the lower Weiser River, both BOD^ and BOD20 concen-
trations were two to three times greater than August levels. In the
absence of increased levels of discharge from domestic sources, the
observed increased BOD concentrations are believed to be the result
of the suspension of bottom sediment organics caused by higher stream-
flow conditions combined with a lower rate of decay due to the extreme
cold water temperatures.
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) concentrations (Figure 33) determined
for the August survey, correlate well with BOD values while gradually
increasing over the entire study reach. The concentration increase
is also indicative of increased algal populations in the lower river.
Nutrient concentrations and loadings are presented in Figures
35 thru 42 and Tables 6 and 7. During August, significant increases
in all nutrients are clearly evident below the confluence of Crane
Creek. The great impact that Crane Creek has on the water quality
of the Weiser River may be seen from the loading graphs - Figures
37, 39, and 41. While some irrigation activity may take place along
Crane Creek, water quality is believed to be related more to soil
conditions and operation of Crane Creek reservoir.
33
-------
TABLE 6
WEISEK RIVER
AVERACE STREAM AMD POINT SOURCE LOADINGS
AUGUST 4-8, 1575
D RAIN'S / DIVERSIONS /
S'JSPHITPED SOLIDS
2 TOTAL
NH3-X
2 TOTAL
U>
NO
MAlNSTEM STATION'S
KL'NICIPAL SOURCES
MILE
l/DAY
INPUT
f/DAY
INPUT
#/DAY
153718
Ueiser R.
•3 Taaarack, Evy 95
95.6
130
153719
Weiaer R.
@ USCS Gauge #2515
94.5
130
—
—
*
*
Diversion-Ease Side
Diversion-East Side
78.8
77.4
(->70
(->100
(->1.0
(->1.3
153720
Ueiser R.
@ Fruitvale
76.9
70
153721
W. Pork Weiser R. (5
Co. Rd. Br.
76.2
1,790
2.8
1.4
3.7
1.4
153722
Wiser R.
6 Council
68.8
1,330
2.2
2.2
153723
153749
153724
Hornet Creek @ Council
Council STP
M» F. Weiser S Hwy 95 Sr.
68. £
66.0
63.2
65
220
1,490
2.3
6.8
2.5
18.0
6.6
K
2.5
153725
Ueiser ft.
0 Coodrich
57.2
2,250
11.2
5.6
153726
Ueiser R.
JSCS Cauge £25£5
50.3
H
K
N
X
N
153785
153728
153727
Canbridga STP
Pir.® Cr. Kr Cac±>ridge
Little Weiser R. Hr
Cagbridg*
46.0
45.3
45.0
8
485
325
1.0
1.3
2.6
N
7
153729
U*Uer ft.
Sr Casbrldge
44.9
2,680
6.7
13.4
*
Diversion-Ease Side
42.7
.(->1,510
(->2.3
(->3.3
(->10.0
(-><3.8
153707
Veis&x R.
Above Hi civile
41.7
1,190
3.0
<3.0
153708
Keichly Creek Nr Midvale
37.3
120
. —
153709
Ueiser R.
6 Mid vale
36.4
2,720
<3.9
27
153710
Crane Cr. 15 Mi. Ab
Veiser
16.7
53,700
83.6
21
55.5
515
153711
Ueiser R.
£ USGS Gauge t 2660
15.1
64,900
32
490
*
*
Sunnyside Canal
Calloway Canal
14.1
13.2
(->10,600
(->44,300
(->16.5
(-) 68.9
(->5.2
(->22
(->13.8
(->58.2
(->80
(->335
153712
Ueiser £.
Ab Weiscr
8.1
10,700
14
180
153713
153715
V-tr.r. Creek Ab Weiser
Diversion-North Side
Lower* Pay«cte Ditch
6.8
6.1
2.1
2,180
(->1,390
2,120
3.4
(->2.2
3.3
2.1
C->1.4
5.6
(->3.7
2.1
62
(->39
2.3
153714
Ueiser R.
Ab Ueiser -
1.9
17,100
12
350
133717
Ueiser R.
@ Ueiser Buy 95
0.8
19,000
18
300
153716
Konroe Creek
0.6
1,770
2.8
2.4
39
X02+XQ3-S
2 TOTAL
INPUT
X
1.1
81.7
(-)12.7
(->53.2
9.8
(->6.2
Footnote*:
TOTAL ?HOS?r.Cr.VS
1 TOTAL
J/31Y I>r?L'T
1.5
2.8
(->1-1
(->1.6
1.1
3.9 1.0
15.0
6.S 2.2
11.7 2.9
26
N N
2.2
5.9 1.4
41
(->17 (->4.1
14
23
325 79.3
365
(->60 (->14.6
(-)250 (->61.0
100
25 6.1
(•>lo (->3.9
14 3.4
140
125
11 2.7
* Flew Meaaureaect only: Leading* baaed upon cooceatratlon* £owid ec Minit coafarable aiinttea •tatioa.
——1 L««a cban IX or 1#/Day.
21 Ko date available.
-------
TABLE 7
VEISEIt RIVER
AvaucE STEIAK akd poi:jt SOURCE LOADINGS-
DECaoa 2-4. 1976
1/
OJ
i-n
VLM^IST^ STATIONS
Velser 2l. £ Tacarack, S*y 95
feiaer *. e uses Cause #2515
DRAi:iS/DIVZRSIOUS /
MLIIICIPAl SOUHCES
Diversion-East Side
Diversion-Ease Side
153720 Welser &• € Fruirvale
153721 V. Fork Weleer *. 6
£©. 2d. Br.
153722 Utlser 1- @ Council
153323
1S3749
152724
153725 Velaet Z. € Goodrich
153726 Vela** £. f SCS Caoge #2585
153765
153728
153727
Hornet Crack $ Council
Couacil STP
X. F. Keiaer G Hwy 95 Br.
Cambridge ST?
Pine Creek Kr Cambridge
Little tfeiaer 2.. Sr
Caa&rld$e
153729- Veictt L. Hr Caabridge
* DiverstoorLast Side
1537G7 Uei*e? 2- Above Xidvala
15370B Keithly Creak £r Jildvale
15370$ Velaer JL 9 hidvale
153710
Crcae Creek 15 HI.
Above V«ie*r
153711 Waiaer &. 3 CSCS Gauge 92660
153712
153714
153717
Ueiaer L Abov* tfeisex
153713
*
153715
Veiser St. Above K*.is*r
Uel«er E. ? "Weieer, Sbv 92
15 3716
Sunnyside Canal
Callovay Canal
Mans Creek Above Weieer
Diversion-North Side
Lower Payette Ditci
Itosroe Creek @ U«l««r
MVUL
MILE
95.6
94.5
78. a
77.4
76.9
76.2
64.5
68. 6
66.0
63.2
57.2
50.J
46.0
45.3
45.0
44.9
42.7
41.7
37.3
36.4
16.7
15.1
14.1
13.2
6.1
6.8
6.1
2.1
1.9
0.6
O.fc
susraro&p solids
: TOTAL
J/IAY
1,070
6,880
2,070
23,000
5,330
X
17,700
142,200
132,700
33
1,190
136,500
510,000
303.000
125
347,500
1,600
922.200
1,800,000
220
154,000
35,700
225
3.2
N"
10.7
32.7
1.0
WH3-S
3! TOTAL
tf/DAY IS?UT
<5.3
1.7
-------
Downstream from Crane Creek, total phosphorus concentrations in
the Weiser River increase 300% and N0£ + NO3 concentrations increase
200%. Below Mann Creek, total phosphorus increases 25% and NO2 + NO3
increases another 75%. The significance of Crane Creek in relation
to the water quality of the Weiser River during August is also seen
on Table 6. Crane Creek contributes 84% of the suspended solids, 56%
of the ammonia, 82% of the NO2 + NO3, and 79% of the total phosphorus
loading to the Weiser River over the entire study reach. During
December nutrient levels (Figure 36) are not conclusive and cannot
be adequately explained. Flows were much greater during this December
survey and increased bottom scour may be involved. The most signifi-
cant sources of NO2 + NO3 (Figure 38 and Table 7) are the Little
Weiser River and the Middle Fork Weiser River. Crane Creek does not
exhibit the same impact on the Weiser during this December period as
was observed during the August period. During the December study,
Crane Creek flow was low at 18 cfs as compared with a flow of 180
cfs during the August survey. NO2 + NO3 loading (Figure 38) is
observed to be significantly reduced below the Midvale area during
December. Loadings observed for two lower Weiser River stations are
low. During this period, ice flows were occurring in the lower Weiser
River. The low observed results may be due to collection of non-
representative samples in this area. The low NO2 + NO3 values are
not supported by the observed loading trends for total phosphorus
(Figure 40), NH3 (Figure 42) or suspended solids (Figure 46).
Suspended solids (SS) concentrations (Figures 43 and 44) increase
more than seven times below Crane Creek during the August survey.
36
-------
During December, SS levels were generally much higher than August
levels mainly due to the greater streamflows and runoff. In the lower
Weiser, SS levels were observed at about 400 mg/1. At the two lower
stations, however, concentrations were very low. These values are
somewhat questionable due to the great amount of floating ice chunks
being carried by the river in this lower area.
Turbidity (Figure 43) increases nearly 50 times below Crane Creek
during August and then declines significantly at the three lower sta-
tions. The Galloway and Sunnyside Canals diversion dam is located
across the Weiser River approximately 3 to 4 miles downstream from
Crane Creek. The small slack water pool created by this diversion
dam appears to be the prime factor in reducing observed turbidity
levels at these stations.
Bacteriological results are presented on Table 8 and Figures 47
and 48. During August, bacterial densities increased below Tamarack.
Resort cabins and private homes are located in this area and septic
tank drainage or other discharges may be largely responsible for this
increase. Levels again increase below Cambridge most likely as a
result of the municipal lagoon discharge to the river. Crane Creek
has no apparent effect on the bacteriological quality of the Lower
Weiser River. During December, bacterial densities are generally
lower although a considerable increase is noted in the reach below
Cambridge. The Idaho Class A standards for Total and Fecal Coliforms
are seen to be exceeded at certain locations during both surveys.
During August standards are exceeded in the Tamarack vicinity and
again in the lower 30 miles of the Weiser. During December standards
37
-------
STATICS
RIVER
.,0
static:; na>e
KILE
153718
Weiser R @ Tanarack (Hvy 95)
95.6
153719
Weiser S (? L'SCS Gage #2515
94.5
153720
Ueiser R @ Fruitvale
76.9
153721
VJr Weiser R 9 Cnty Rd Br
75.2
153722
Weiser R Q Council
63.8
153723
Korr.et Cr @ Council
68.6
153749
Council STP
66.0
15 3724
MF Weiser (? Hvy 95
63.2
153725
Weiser R @ Goodrich
57.2
153726
Ueiser R @ USCS Cage 62585
50.3
153785
Car6rid;>£ STP
46.0
153728
Pine Cr r.r Cambridge
45.3
153727
Little Weiser R nr
45.0
Caisbridj'.e
153729
Weiser R nr Cacbridge
44.9
153707
Weiser R ab Midvale
41.7
153708
Keithly Cr nr Midvale
37.3
153709
Weieer R Q Midvale
36.4
153710
Crane Cr nr Mouth
16.7
153711
Weiser R Q L'SCS Cage t2660
15.1
153712
Ueiser R ab Weiser
8.1
153713
Mann Cr nr Weiser
6.8
153715
Lower Payette Ditch
2.1
153714
Weiser R Q Weiser (Cnty Rd)
1.9
153717
Weiser R € Weiser (Kvy 95)
0.8
153716
Monroe Cr
0.6
August 5-7, 1975 and December 2-4, 1975
(jj
00
TABLE 8
WEISER BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
GEOMETRIC MEANS
TOTAL
CPU FORM
AUGUST
FECAL
COLIFORM
FECAL
STREP
SO
240
620
330
300
1830
330
210
60
70
1450
770
90
AO
35
190
170
210
800
165
90
23
18
45
225
60
60
20
290
250
200
525
1000
340
50
65
220
200
270
205
160
325
1D0
800
780
560
4150
3150
715
945
2200
35
25
215
90
340
260
230
2220
410
295
275
750
185
25
330
140
625
560
530
1730
3600
500
820
1200
TOTAL
COLIrORM
ESCSSER
FECAL
COLIFOSM
FECAL
STRE?
no
220
52
ISO
410
300
90
150
270
3500
370
740
2100
9400
98
840
370
£20
140
1700
600
200
670
78
10
<4 '
110
66
98
64
140
190
2500
370
740
1500
310
98
730
10
190
110
890
46
58
160
110
10
54
250
92
420
SO
250
230
4700
80
3C0
2900
300
200
1100
460
300
510
360
140
100
450
-------
are generally exceeded in the lower 50 miles for Total Coliform and
lower 70 miles for Fecal Coliform.
The Fecal Coliform to Fecal Strep (FC/FS) ratios"'" are plotted
in Figures 49 and 50. Generally, the ratios are low for both surveys
although at certain locations, higher ratios tend to indicate evidence
of human pollution. During August a ratio of 2.1 was determined for
the Weiser River below Tamarack, again supporting the possibility of
septic tank drainage in this area. Ratios in the lower 80 miles are
relatively low with most values suggesting an animal bacterial source.
Ratios determined during the December survey also suggest an animal
source except in the vicinity below Cambridge where a human bacterial
source is indicated.
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
Benthic macroinvertebrate samples were collected using artificial sub-
strate of the rock-basket type. The substrates were exposed for an approx-
imately two month period at representative sites on the Weiser and Payette
Rivers. The colonized substrates were then removed and the macroinvertebrates
were scraped from the substrate into a jar containing a 70% ethanol solution.
The samples were shipped to the Regional laboratory, were sorted, counted,
and identified as to genus and where possible to species. This data was
then employed to calculate a species diversity index and indicate species
density.
The health of the benthic macroinvertebrate community of a stream
reflects the water quality status of that stream. In general, unpolluted
^ See page 29 for FC/FS explanation
39
-------
streams support a biologic community with a high species diversity, while
polluted waters support a community of low species diversity.
The composition of the macroinvertebrate community of the Payette
River indicate a healthy population, as measured by the diversity index
(Figure 27). This diversity declines slightly in the slower moving reach
of the stream near the mouth. In this reach, there is an increase in the
number of pollution tolerant organisms (see Figure 28).
Similarly the benthic fauna of the Weiser River declines moving down-
stream in species diversity (Figure 52) and number of individuals (Figure
53). The composition of the community shifts toward those organisms which
are facultative in adapting to presence of organic pollution and sediment
loading in the overlying waters.
The biological data obtained for the Weiser and Payette River stations
are presented in the appendix.
40
-------
GRAPHICS
41
-------
FIGURE 3
¦zsxixo
XJSSOBi
\saxB
BSXB
+SX&
PAYETTE RIVER SU RV ELY
AUQU9T A—S. 1S73
_~ f-n i I i—t—| n i—P3 j
rO Q
-O-
£5g
>-1— -j
— —i
OO o
5 ujx
rV)
1 i
zz
55 2
1.0
>««ri
t-
2
52
ao
-------
F*
a
w
c
F"
4&BXB-
3S0GB-
C322XS-
2S00-
S-WZGJ-
sexzxs-
-p»
CO
LS00-
FIGURE 4
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4-. 1S7S
AVERAGE BASIN FLOWS
] MAJOR INFLOWS
H
0
1
3
1.0
8
3
O
w
p
S£9
33
*0
BJVER KILES
e
W
5
H
h-i
e
s
o
>•
3
2
g
W
5
-------
0
FIGURE 5
PAYETTE. RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST 4-8 1975 AVERAGE VALUES
TEMPERATURE X « DISSOLVED OXYGEN 3
PH
= D. 0. % SATURATION
MAX pH STD.
MIN pH STD.
IDW0~*3.0. STANDARD
T"
Q
~r
&
-r
8
CO
. o
•4 i—i
"B5. p*
, O **
PJ CM
i—I ^
UJ
t3
^ >"
Qo X
-o O
ft
UI
ȣ -J
"6%. <-<
ft
^RIYEB MILES
LU o
i= !
LU -1
£ t
Q- 3
O
s
Q-
H-
h-
UJ
-------
FIGURE 6
Fayette river survey
DEC&MDER 2-4- 1S75 AVERAGE VALUES
UJ
-------
¦c*
O-l
D
Z
S
s
o
L
V
E
D
O
X
V
o
E
N
M
O
/
t_
14.,0-r
FIGURE 7
PAVETTE RIVER SURVEY
T»AYE.TTE, R. 100 FT BELOW 1PAYETTE. 3TT
ALIO B-7 1873 DIURNAL D.O.
r . n
i. &
12.0- •
10.0- -
8.0--
B.0
1200 1400 1600
1800 2000 2200 0000 0200 0400 0600 0800 1000 1200
AUG. 6 AUG. 7
-------
D
1
S
3
O
u
V
e
D
O
X
V
o
E
N
14..0-1-
FIGURE 8
FAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
PAVETT6 R. 100 FT DEt_QU PaVETTE STP
DEC 2 — 3• 1S7S DIURNAL D•O•
r . n • i • e>
12.0--
10.0--
8.0- -
M
O
~
B.0-
IDAHO D.O. STANDARD
H—H 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 0000 0200 0400 0600 0800 1000 1200
DEC. 2
DEC. 3
-------
00
a
z.
A
O
B
tO n
+ -
FIGURE 9
Payette river survey
AUGUST 4—8 1875
0 » BOD-S X » BOD-20 3 a TOT. ORG. CARBON
average values —- hainstem stations connected
CO
CVi -
~T
9
t.
>-
2
%
S
H
w
T
9
8
hJ
hJ
O
EC
~r
8
LlI
& Q
Pn ^
O to
8
£
25
w
2
o
o
s
w
N
r Is
- o
i- «n
- +
- CO
- N
9
s.
C3
c
2
o
m
QC.
<
G
CS
oz
o
o
I—
RIVER MILES
-------
s.0-r
4-.BJ- -
FIGURE 10
PAYETTE. RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 187S
0 ¦ BOD-3 X b BOD—20
AVO. VALUES MA INST ET1 STATIONS CONNECTED
13.5
0
S
o
s
ft
o
/
u
3.0- -
a.0--
t.0- -
40 RIVER MIXES
-------
FIGURE 11
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST 4—6 1875 AVERAGE VALUES
0*NO2+NO3-N X»TQTAL PHOSPHORUS BsNH3-N
ALGAL BLOOM POTENTIAL (N02+N03-N)
CD
r
z
O
z
r
<
RIVER MILE
5g
o • w •
H J NHOi
ohj eg 2
Z D O room
<5 BJ •
|W Iv^Oi
I « O O
H02 jfJ •
SS <
C*S 06 » v-t •
(*<: pcissps
-------
FIGURE 12
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1S75 AVERAGE VALUES
0»NO2+NO3-N X»TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 8«NH3-N
ALGAL BLOOM POTENTIAL (K02+N03-N)
ALGAL BLOOM POTENTIAL (TOTAL PHOS.)
X-
-X
T
8
3
H
H
W
-------
FIGURE
13
3000-
PAVETTE RIVER 9URVEY
AUGUST 4--B. 1873
ND24-ND3-N UDaDINCS
VSS5B8BS&& diversions
%+00--
U
B
S
iee>e>--
D
a
V
US00- -
U1
ro
G00 —
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
+0
RIVER MILES
Es
£ 5
n
o £
s o
5 5
£ 5
M •*
a o
«/> V)
z>o
00
(/> (/)
1 I
S3
o o
en cn
«d
m r-*.
AC eC
a#<*>
co tn
2 V)
s
a: uj
Ol-
<-> <
— x
52
O A
-------
u.
B
3
D
A
V
3000-r
s.^00--
ia 00--
IZ.00--
tn
CO
FIGURE 14
FaVETTE river SURV/EV
DECCnBCR £-V. L87S
NQ2+ND3-N LOADINGS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
XL
JP~
Jll glL
10
Z0
4CL
30
4-0
BTVTTR MILKS
H £
H z
M ^
H
—
O
XX
S 3
g ft.
00 -I o
«/)(/) —J I/}
1 I — I
zz » z
23 2 2
LkJ <
ZflC
It UJ
Oh
o<
= 5
-------
Z000-T
IB00--
L
B
S
D
A
V
1.200--
000--
cn
*00--
FIGURE 15
PAVETTE RIVER SURVEV
AUGUST V-e. 1873
TOTAL. PHOSPHORUS LOADING!
>OOC»POOOOftOy» DIVERSIONS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
11 n « p rflflrq
. n»
uD.
L0
n fjl n
20
El|i
ja_
30
4-0 RIVER MILES
fcl UJ
pk. a-
3 §
o o
CO «/)
X X
I— i—
O O
i/)«/»
22
OO
uj
<
z
<
25
S
z
-------
S000-T
t.
B
D
A
V
LB00--
L20B--
-
tn
ui
*00--
J3_
_o_
-f
XL
10
20
M
5
5
2
UJ
<
=: 5
Z X
SURV E.V
I 07 S
LOaDINGS
CALCULATED KAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
+e> iJVEE MILES
-------
u
a
a
*
v
tn
CD
S00-T
700--
S00--
300--
4-O0 - -
300--
(.00
FIGURE 17
pavette river survey
AUGUST 4--S. LB75
NH3-U LOAD IN OS
V8S8S8S)S8 diversions
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
t0
E0
30
+0
SIVESl kii.es
»- H
»- H
Ui H
£3 O
l/l yt
¦XX
£2
OC iu
o i~
«-»<
—i
Z
o m
K U t- h
22 »
a o «
2
a
-------
a©0 -r
FIGURE 18
favette river surv/ev
DECEMBER a-V. 1873
NH3-N LOAD X NOS
e
3
D
A
V
tn
*«4
700 - -
80fi - -
300--
+00--
300--
Z.00-
100--
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
10
20
30
40
RIVES KILES
a e 1
£ £5 5
S >• H
< -< M
-------
0
FIGURE 19
payette: river survey
august 4~8 IS7S average values
B CNDUCTVTV X a TOT. SOLIDS 3 a TURB. + 15 SUSP. SOLIDS
cn
CO
O
3T
c
D
.J
0d
X
O
C9
*->
E
S-
>
01
H
P
•—i
«
>
*-<
O
01
a
D
.J
P
<
Z
l~
o
o
a
K
p
ul
»-l
u.
8
r*
«-
00
I to
L cj
ho
hO
n
t
ia
T"
8
S
UJ
E
£
Q 41A
Z O •
< -j r-
_i
h OrO
2 S-
w ce
t/1
Z
\Q ov
• *
ON Qi
•C
fo r—
¦ »
OH O*
S 2
cr a?
>3
Ql
<
a
a: -J
& UJ
O h-
o3
Z
O 00
h-
-J
X
o>
^ z
•
< —
UJ
CO
£
UJ o
o
•
+-i
s:
<
-J
•
U- z
LU
°5
CO
4/>
? X
2
f
LU
2 g
o -J
o
X
a
5
0
~
-J
C3
z.
cn
a
>
~ to
a
to
QL
D
H
P
UJ
o
2.
Id
li-
en
cn
-------
0
FIGURE 20
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4» 1S7S AVERAGE VALUES
a CONDUCTIVITY X a TOTAL SOLIDS 3 a SUSP. SOLIDS
•J
\
CD
C
o
X
z
o
Q£
~
>-
P
tn
tn
0
01
Jt
<
H
O
I-
t)
3
P
z
O
u
o
-1
UJ
h
a
»-
r»
u
UI
I
I
a
: in vo o*
T
a
a
s
C3
E
tn
p
~
tn
p
ui
p
z.
Ul
0-
tn
ZJ
in
5
RIVER MJLES
-J r-
-J O0
O ro
x r*
a
cc
ON O*
•O *0
ro
o! o?
a: a:
CO
f
:z>
£
c
h
y
1
ex
a: ui
8 5
z
O CQ
X
«>
z
o* ^ z
2 if §
LU O
•a o:
<» ^ x
z
LU
&
o
CO
(S)
t=
UJ
o
3
CO
-------
122*2*2X3-
1008120'
CTl
O
l_
B
C
A
V
yggggi-
FIGURE 21
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST A—S. 1873
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LOADINSS
&8&885KR DIVERSIONS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
n n
B-fl
m nn.,r
n
X XIX
u oo
I— I— —I
Ui
tpr
UI&jLU
S5J—
oo
(/>
10
^ \o J Z 3l
zz > a: cc
(9 c&> <&>
a vt i/t
s
s>
2
a
22
OO
o <_>
— h-
1/1 —
zo
s
aC .j
£2
-°i
X 3 I
2
22
2?
O O
Zbi-I
_l
_l
• ui
o ui
<
<
<
O Ui
— UI
z
Z
z
Z a£
t/> OC rf
<
<
u
u
u
u
u
_i
UI —J
UI
> :*
UI
£ „
Ui
z ui
— «£ t/1
M O
o
Z
ox
£ O
z
3 V>
oc
£ U
<
X
a.
X
m
o
S
«/>
u
Ui
tc
o
~-
»-
_»
(/)
Z
Ui
£
$
<
_i
Ui
u.
_J
Z
z
>
-------
\
20
3 U R V E V
1875
LPAD1NOS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
as
30
as
40
RIVES MILES
-------
FIGURE 23
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
10000-r-
AUQUST 4—a 1975 —- QEOMETRIC MEANS
®*TOTAL COLXFDRM X* FECAL COL I FORM 8»FECAL STREP
Ol
to
B
A
C
T
E
If
2
A
t
0
0
M
L
CI ASS A TOTAL COLIFOPM ST AST)AM
' CLASS A FECAL COLIFORM STAKDAHB (man 1 50)
g 6g
§ S3
«©
Fw g,./.®
R-»a Br-
agg
F *
hb ^
s
g
10
s
d
£
o
PM
cn
<4
£
pi
&3
-------
FIGURE 24
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1873 OEOMETRIO MEANS
0-TOTAL COL. I FORM X»F£CAL COLIFORM 3-FECAL STREP
at
u
a
A
C
T
e.
ft
l
A
1
0
0
M
u
CLASS A TOTAL COLIFORM STANDARD
(mean £240)
. CLASS A ncu COLIFORM STAHDAKD
(aeao S SO)
63:
W !
8
• \Q
T** •
C\
5
I 3 < S
1
M
H
5
3
s
O
s
§
N
§
RIVER MILES
-------
FIGURE 25
P^VETTS HlVfcH SUHVtY
a.»-T-
F
a
,0-_
MJQU9T 4— « 187S
AVB. VALXIB9---riAXNSTKri STATIONS OOHNCCTES
w
H
pa
0
ot
(t
A
T
t
O
t.0<
1.0-
REPRESENTS THE AVE WE OF
RATIOS OF 0.1, 0.1. »«•<
Ei
a
tS - w
5 HhJ
o y-j
i .J a Go
H <3*59
~jzt-» da
.< M M §¦<
BUZ P 5w
s* oS <«
g
w>
«
ptf
ca»
Z
M
2
Q
10
2
o«
CO
S
Pi
-------
FIGURE 26
PAYETTE RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1873
-------
FIGURE 27
^iSVETTE RtVER SURVEY
MACROX NVERTEORATE DIVER3ITV INDEX
august - Novat-tncre L87a
O-I
D
z
V
£
R
S
I
T
V
X
N
D
e
x
CLEAN WATER
3.0
2.0-
MODERATE POLLUTION
1.0-
EXTREME POLLUTION
10
20
30
20 RIVER MILES
w
H
H
W
-------
cr>
*vl
N
O
0
F"
t
N
D
1
V
z
t>
U
A
TKXSi-
22J2C3-
18PP1.
FIGURE 28
PaVETTE river survey
MACRO1NVERTEDRATE COUNT
AUQU3T - NOVEflBER 1873
10
20
-4-
aet
to
as RIVEP MILES
w
Q
P3
H
53
H
H
<
P
W
i—1
O
H
¦s
c
W
PM
£3
iJ
P(S
PU
Pn
H
H
W
Pi
fa
O
H
z
s
-------
FIGURE 29
320-
S40-
WEI9ER RIVER Sl_J RVEY
AUQU3T 4--S . 1B75
aver/sse basin flows
5SififtS£®£ftfcas DIVERSIONS
I "| MAJOR INFLOWS
CTl
CXI
F"
o
w
c
F*
3
LB0-
J.22J-
B2J-
SO
+C2T
OS
g2j
ui ^
O uj
— ut
(IT OC
U
z
£z
ss
sea
10a
RIVER KILES
3 u>
< uz ft.
a: a o
0£lO lA
—1/»
Ld< <
z
eo o
o — —
et ac
H" U< UJ
tro >
ui — —
U a a
8
S
-------
¦LSXZXS-
seo-
CT>
lO
F"
L.
O
W
a
F-
S
easet-
4-02J-
eee-
w
o
3
w
O
00
p
g»pl
ss
FIGURE 30
WEISER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4-. 1873
AVERAQE BA3IN FLOWS
MAJOR INFLOWS
-uz>
ee>
SB
120 RIVER MILES
g
s
— uj M
ui a
— ij i-
UJ M UI
3 gl
* 5 o
-------
FIGURE 31
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST +-S 1073 AVERAGE VALUES
X a DISSOLVED OXYGEN 3 a PH
• = D. 0. % SATURATION
0 » TEMP.
r-
MIN. pH STD. _
~IDAH0 D.0. STD?
~r
B
"T"
$
* °
o-5
o
<3-
°og
CD o
U3
cs
c
z
Id
a
>
X
o
fl
u
>
-J
a
cn
cn
cn
z
D
P
0£
<
O
<
m
-
X
o
c
UJ
o
CO
oo
y i ^
UJ C_> UJ
a UQO
UJ LlI 111 z
UJ ^ w 2;
CL
£T
UJ
?
O
_J _J
< <
UJ
o a o
>- UJ
UJ
c o
5 00
tr
a
—i 2
< 2
O 3
00
UJ •
t
Q CC
UJ
V
oo cn
a:
cr
1 UJ
o
UJ
u
J— cn
UJ
to
CD —
UJ
<£
<
C UJ
z
Q
UJ
>
UJ 5:
«—
_
o
a.
cc
5
^ UJ
O —J
§
cr
1 H-
o
o
u_
UJ —J
Lj
>
_j
—
o
Q
Q
u
2:
ZD
cr:
a:
a:
o
h~
00
o
c
cr
<
-------
FIGURE 32
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4. 1S7S AVERAGE VALUES
0 S TEnF. X a DISSOLVED OXYGEN 3 a FH
• = D. 0. % SATURATION
_ CD
m x
lu O uj
LU h~ LU
en — a:
^ OQO
U UJ Lu 2
Q K 2
Ui
5:
r lu
: c
CL
2
O
-J -i ^
< C Uj
Z2LU
< < q:
oao
>- LU iLi
C Q 2
3 co q:
< 2:
o r>
to
LU
I
o
LU
.
Q
a:
LU
—
LU
to
a:
CC
1
UJ
U
1—
CO
LU
CO
<
UJ
LU
2
S
LU S
el
cr
O
LU
_J
g
—
h-
<
00
h-
CJ
en.
LU
-J
>
Q
on
UJ
cc
o
Q
Q
en
1r
UJ
to
LU
a:
o
<
CE
<
-------
FIGURE 33
WEISER RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST 4~-8 XB75
0 o BOD-S X ¦ BQD-20 3 a TOT. ORB. CARBON
AVERACE VALUES MA INSTEM STATIONS CONNECTED
UiOU
stag
OQO
tu ui uiZ
UJZUJS
£L
tr
s!s>£
CJ u o
S VI E
c :
(S>:
<
o
waE
I LU O
t-co UJ
UJ — UJ Q
< LU 2 Q
U5 - -
Q. 0£
5 B|
12 —
£X
UJ
CO
UJ
X
£
o
a
o
u
8
q:
cc
UJ
v>
cc
o
o
fcu
*
o
<
a:
c
-------
FIGURE 34
UE1SER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1875
0 b BOD-3 X = BOD-20
AVO. VALUES—-MA IN ST Ell STATIONS CONNECTED
u>
B
o
D
n
Q
~
«.0
7.0
S.0--
A-.9--
i.0
3.0- -
Ml «
wt w
PS U W
W
to w z
'i
3
a
£
*
•
Ptf W
P*
PiS
oti
w uw
W
i-3
to O
W
M
M UQ
M
O
W 2H
z
S HP^
5
P
a 1
g
8
& 3
s
w
i-3
9
Q
a
a
100
RIVER MILES
PS
w
CO
M
bJ
s
H
VI
W
>
-------
FIGURE 35
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST 4—8 IB73 AVERAGE VALUES
0«NO2+NO3-N X^TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 8=NH3-N
ALGAL BLOOM POTENTIAL (N02+N03-N)
£
K
\
CD
Z
z
Q
x:
E
<
ALGAL BLOOM POTENTIAL
(TOTAL PHOS.)
6B
8 RIVER
PS
Hi
Pi
«
w
W
w
~J
W
M
M
M
w
u
W
xs-
g
s
£
o
u
g
s
w
H
J
tn
Q
W
Q
¦s
H
£
8
-------
FIGURE 36
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1875 AVERAGE VALUES
0BNO2+NO3-N X=TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 8=NH3-N
U,
w
U
W
g
a
a
u
CJ
CJ
Pi
WW
w
cr. o
z
HH ££
3
v J
u
w
-j
c
>
n
pi
Pi
Pi
w
w
LO
CO
h-<
i—i
M
w
CJ
w
5S
13
o
o
g
o
o
pn
w
H
cc
Q
w
CD
H
z
o
•E
31
<
RIVER MILES
u
3
$
H
-------
L
8
S
D
A
V
CT»
14-00--
1200--
1000--
*00--
S00--
~00--
Z00- "
20
CtJ jj
U o
ss
ss
orz
15
-j _i ^
< < ui
II 2
uo o
> UJ Uj
< O 2
0«/> K
FIGURE 37
UCISER RIVER SURVEY
AUOU3T 4--a. LS7S
ND2 + ND3-N LOAD 1N OS
&3£fi£££££ DIVERSIONS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
'UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
+0
0 W |
0 |
¦H *—I-
-e&-
80
L00
2IVEE KILES
-------
L
B
S
O
A
Y
•vj
LB00-r
FIGURE 38
REISER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER «-4-. 107S
ND2+ND3-N LDaDXNOS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
20
+0
ee>
80
U00 RIVER MILES
0S UJ
u o
%n ec
bl
to-
ri:
S=
-------
2S00'
2000
U
® IS00
/•
c
0 L000
00
S00
FIGURE 39
UC1SER RIVER SURVEV
AUOUST 4--S. IS7S
total phosphorus LOADINGS
figaSSSSSS DIVERSIONS
US)
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
+0
00
¦m» - |
100 STVEX MILES
Z
is 2
t
a
&
DO
s
3
8
-------
L
B
S
D
ft
V
aaee-r
2000—-
1200--
FIGURE 40
UC13CR RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER R-*. 187S
TOTAL. PHOSPHORUS LOADINGS
-J
vo
1000--
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
1.00 RIVER MILES
w
g
£
- H
uj rj
2*
*
J
5
o
X
-------
FIGURE 41
UClStR river SURVEY
AUQUST 4--B. LB73
-------
L
a
D
A
Y
00
FIGURE 42
UC1SCR RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER «-+. IS7S
NH3-N LOAD INOS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
Z0
100
RIVEJt MILES
UJ
UJ
UJ
ec
Ui
ec
u
u
fitful
UI
CdO
wee
s
Uo
u
&>
a
2
— w
uj O
* n
3
*
aC
O
B
3
-------
FIGURE 43
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST +-8 1375 AVERAGE VALUES
CNDCTIVITY X « TOT. SOLIDS 3 » TURB • + a SUSF. SOLIDS
r $
*
-8
-8
T"
8
*1 X ^
LuOai
uj I- iu
(XL — £T
O O O
a
UJ UJ u z
Ul Z LLl S
CL
a
UJ
Q
_j -J ^
< < UJ
55S
a a o
v uj uj
< 5
g^a:
_j > o
c ;
O
UJ
-J
cr oc
I UJ (_>
h- CO UJ
co — UJ CD
< uj Z Q
uj ^
£L CC
St
<
o
UJ •
>
a
UJ
CO
UJ
tr
o
c
o
3
8
(T
UJ
cr
o
i~
co
UJ
2
u
c
cr
<
-------
0
FIGURE 44
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
December 2-4. 1375 — average values
B CONDUCT IVI TV X =» TOTAL SOLIDS 3 » SUSPENDED SOLIDS
00
GJ
C9
C
m
a
o
ET)
o
H
r.
o
0£
O
*—«
O
3
13
Z
o
CJ
a
ul
mm
u.
\
CO
c
tn
a
M
_J
o
tn
a
UJ
a
z
UT
P-
on
D
tn
^ i ^
HJOUI
a ° 00
tu UJ LlI z
^21=5
UJ 2 LlI 2
Q_
a:
uj
—i -j
< < iu
Z Z UJ
5 < ce
o o o
>- UJ
< o
2
S CO
<
cr
-» >-
o
—i 2
< 2
CD ZD
CO
<
>
Q
Lu •
oo: UJ
— UJ
cn CC OH
I uj O
h- iSl UJ
CO —- UJ g
< UJ 2 I
O —J
giE
a. cc
CD
s
>
Q
tr
a:
o
O
a
8
o:
a
UJ
to
cr
o
Ll_
O
<
cc
<
-------
00
¦t*
U
D
S
D
A
V
ave>e>e> -r
70000- ¦
B0000--
S0000--
4-0000--
30000--
80000
1.0000--
FIGURE 45
REISER RIVER SURVEY
MJQU3T 4--B. 1873
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LOADINGS
t&SSBSSSBS DIVERSIONS
CALCULATED MAINSTEM LOAD BASED
UPON ACTUAL MEASURED CONCENTRATIONS
20
+0
80
B0
100 RIVER MILES
Sgf
uZI*4
eo>
3r <
>LJ Ul
52 1
Oi/i ad
3
>
8
a
:*
*
B
3
-------
10.000,0003-
l
B
D
A
V
oo
-------
FIGURE 47
UEXSER RIVER SURVEY
AUGUST 4-8 1873 --- QEOtlETRIC MEANS
0-TOTAL COLIFORM X-FECAL COLIFORM 8"FECAL STREP
8
s
A
C
T
E.
m
x
A
L
0
H
L
RIVER MILES
w
a
o
i
WU
Hw
VlHUEt]
fea
u
£
9
HH 2
85
H
&
W
CO
M *4
g a
11
Pm
a
Q
Q
£
Pd
W
CO
Si
2
K
g
-------
1000007
FIGURE 48
WEXSER RIVER SURVEY
DECEMBER 2-4- 1873 GEOMETRIC MEANS
®*TOTAL OOLXFORM X-FECAL COLXFORM S*FECAL STREP
oo
sj
A
C
T
e
R
X
A
I
0
0
M
u
CLASS A TOTAL COLIFORM STANDARD
(mean 1240)
100
RIVER MILES
W
tow
%
m
a
s
a
u
CJ
w
«
I
S
8
0
1
s
e
R
w
g
-------
FIGURE 49
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
rs.B-
AUGUST 4-8. 1373
AVO. VALUES MAINSTEM STATIONS CONNECTED
STRONG EVIDENCE OF
HUMAN WASTES
4»i (25-
F-
C
S
P
3.0-
ta
w
p-
CJ
w
M
A
PREDOMIN ANCE OF HUMAN WASTES
IN MIXED POLLUTION
CD
00
ft
A
T
Z
O
SL'B>
L<0
UNCERTAIN SOURCE
PREDOMINANCE OF LIVESTOCK WASTES
MIXED P0I.T.1TTT0N
STRONG EVIDENCE OF LIVESTOCK
ORIENTED WASTES
LC3Z> RIVER MILES
W
>
-------
FIGURE 50
UEISER RIVER SURVEY
00
\o
F"
c
~
r
R
A
T
t
O
a>0
4>.0
3.0
SS.0
1.0
DECEMBER 2-4- 1373
AVQ. VALUES MAlNSTEM STATIONS CONNECTED
STRONG EVIDENCE OF
HUMAN WASTES
PREDOMINANCE 0? HUMAN WASTES
IS MIXED POLLUTION
UNCERTAIN SOURCE
PREDOMINANCE OF LIVESTOCK HASTES
_-LL.KLXED POLLUTION
STRONG EVIDENCE OF LIVESTOCK
ORIENTED HASTES
1 nr* "''ILF.?
-------
V+.0-T
FIGURE 51
V/EI3E.R RIVER SURVEY
WEI3ER R. ABOVE WE1SER. R.M. 1.8
AUQ 7-6. 187 3 DIURNAL D.O,
C
I
s
9
o
u
v
E.
D
J.2.0--
10.0--
«o
o
O
X
V
Q
E.
N
O.B- -
M
O
~
u
e.0-
IDAHO D.O. STANDARD
H 1 ! 1 1 1 h
+—I 1 1 1
1200 1400 1600 1800
AUG 7
2000 2200 0000 0200 0400 0600
AUG 8
0800 1000 1200
-------
4..0-T-
FIGURE 52
WE X SCR RIVER SURVEY
MACROINVERTEBRATE DIVERSITY INDEX
AUQU3T - NOVEMBER LB79
D
1
V
E
R
9
t
T
V
t
N
D
C
X
CLEM WATER
3.0
2.0--
MOKMTE POIXOTICtl
1.0-
KXCBKM8 POLLUTION
+0 obi aes us river miles
ttS WW 1-1
« is y
w > H S3
g i § i
-------
4CB0
FIGURE 53
UelSER RIVER SURVEY
MACROXNV6RTfcORAT£ COUNT
AUGUST - NOVtMOCR 1873
-------
APPENDIX A
93
-------
October 31, 1975
COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT
fr
Permlttoo:
NPOES Permit No:
Receiving Water:
ra
Date of Inspection:
nPurpose:
^3
Participants:
ft
11
Summary of Findings
Survey Procedure:
v/
11
City of fiev Plymouth
301 Plymouth Avenue
New Plymouth, Idaho Q3655
(D-002033-9
Effectlvo Date:
Expiration Data:
January 11, 1974
December 31, 1976
Payette River at Mile 11
August 7, 1975
To determine compllanca with NPOES Permit.
Jon Wroten - Idaho Dopt. of Health arid Welfare,
Division of Environment
George Varln - Idaho Dept. of Health and Welfare,
Division of Envlronmant
Michael Holladay - Cl+h Engineer
Lowell Slmonson - Mayor, City of New Plymouth
The dike maintenance at this lagoon system Is lacking
and consIderablo washing has taken place. Total ncn-
fl/terabfa rosfdual and pH determinations ware outsldo
•the NPDES Units.
The Inspections were conducted In a manner acceptable
to EPA;. An ISCQ automatic sampler was used to obtain
two 24-hour composite samples. Sample volume and
frequency was approximately 200 ml per hour. AH
samples were stored on Ice until pickup than trans-
ported to EPA mobile laboratory facilities stationed
at Ontario, Oregon. Flow measurement was recorded
at two locations using several methods.
t. Influent
e. Direct reading of staff gage on parshall flume,
b. The parshall flume was measured to determines
If slopes, sides, floors, etc., meet specifi-
cations for standard parshall flume.
2. Effluent
a. Flow rate W3s determined as measured through ;
standard rectangular weir with side contracts,
b. Flow rate was determined as volume In clrcuU:
pipe x velocity.
95
-------
A discussion was hold with Mayor SImonson and City
Engineer, Mike HoiIsday, to dotormlne If tho City of
New Plymouth was awaro of all tho provisions of tho
NPDES Permit. Theso findings are listed bo low:
Condition G.I: Tho City Is aware of this provision of
the permit and will comply If and when necossary.
Condition G.1: Tho City Is aware of this provision
including Sections A, B, and C.
Condition G.5: The City Is aware of this provision.
Condition G.4: Tha City Is awara of this provision QriC4
will comply with Sections A, B, and C.
Condition G.5: The City Is aware of this provision anci
will comply with maintenance requIrcments by rlprapp_
Ing lagoon dikes this winter <1975-76).
Condition G.6: The City Is aware of this provision
Condition G.7: Tha City Is aware of this provision.
Condition G.5: The City Is aware of this provision
and any consequences resulting from a violation of
said provision.
Condition G.9: The City Is aware of this provision
and will comply when necossary to Sections A, B,
and C.
Condition G.10: The City Is awSre of this provision
but has no industrial users on tho system.
Condition G.11: The City Is aware of this provision.
Condition S.1: The City Is aware of these provisions.
Extended until Deconber 31, \916.
Condition S.1.A: The city Is aware that at times +hQ
present discharge Is outside tho pH limits of 6 to 9^
Condition S.l.b: The city Is aware that at times thQ
discharge contains higher concentrations of suspends^
solids than that allowed by the NPOES Ponnlt. This
was substantiated by solf-monltorlng as well as
compliance survey data.
96
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
Page 3
CondIt ton S.I .C: The City Is aware of this provision
and Is In compliance with sar.i9.
Condition S.4: The City Is aware of this provision
and has decided to try and attain zero discharge.
This provision Is not due until July 1, 1976.
Condition S.5: Section A, B, and C are being complied
with.
. - Condition S.6: The City Is aware of these provisions
^ U and Is In compliance with Sections A, B, and C, and
wl11 remain so.
J
Condition S.7: Tho City Is aware of these provisions
and Is submitting all necessary reports at specified
time Intervals.
Condition S.3: The City Is aware of this provision
and will comply with same.
Condition S.9: The City Is aware of this provision and
will comply with sane.
Condition S.10: The City Is aware of this provision and
Is disposing of solids In an acceptable manner.
Condition S. 11: The City Is aware of this provision
and will notify all parties necessary to comply with
same. The City wilt also submit the required reports
and In general comply with all provisions contained
herein.
Cond 1 tlon S. 1 ?.: Tho City Is aware of this provision
and has had no past record of diversion or by-passing.
Field Data
Date
8-05-75
8/06/75
8/07/75
Time
11:00
11:15
11:35
Temperature °C
23.5
23.4
22.0
Conductivity
500
560
650
(mlcromhos)
pH (S.U.)
8.9
8.8
8.7
D.O. (mg/L)
6.2
7.0
7.1
Turbidity (J.T.
U. )62
70
72
97
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
Pago 4
Laboratory Data
ffl)
d
Date (24 hour composite starting)
3/05/75
0/06/75
COD (mg/L)
42
40
T. ALK Ca C03 (mg/L)
192
213
Total Residue (mg/L)
442
437
Total Vol Residue (mg/L)
110
127
Total NFLT Residue (mg/L)
154
25
Vol. NFLT Residue (mg/L)
31
17
NH3-N Total (mg/L)
0.160
0.02
N02-N Total (mg/L)
0.001
Loss than 0.001
NO3-N Total (mg/L)*
0.06
Loss than 0.01
Tot. K.N. (mg/L)
1.70
1.60
T. Phos (mg/L)
1.0
1.0
Dls. Phos (mg/L)
0.06
0.86
O-PO4 (mg/L)
0.50
0.75
BOD (mg/L)
5.5
6.6
TOC (mg/L)
17.0
16.0
Comparative Data
Compliance Evaluation
mq/L Lbs/day*
Permit Conditions
mq/L Lbs/day
90 412
5.5
6.6
154
25
35.5
42.6
995.3
161.5
105
481
BOD
8/5/75
pV6/75
"-s.s.
0/5/75
8/6/75
*Flow based on a 2-day average
Conclusion
The New Plymouth treatment system Is basically doing a good Job of treating
the municipal wastewaters. Tho Cfty Ts wol 1 Informed'about' its tiPDES Permit and
In compliance with same". The City Indicated that the Inside dikes would be rip-
rapped this winter and this should help reduce the suspended solids level In the
final effluentl
TtocommenclatTon s ;
The pH condition may need to be reviewed and possibly changed.
* • ••
9R
-------
xu/v/jv-i uurswvt piciyi ur /ic/u.m /«u ncunuui
Environmental Services Division
Boise, Idaho
N*»
*ne
New Plymouth
Date
Permit No. ID-002Q38-9
fi-7-75 ;
Location New Plymouth
in Payette
Co.
Design: Capacity (">*• ""n/n.ivl 260 lbs BOP/dav Flow Qgd) 1.2 MHO
P.E. 410 Totnl Acres PfTT F.m*™.nrV Ms.™* n« W
By-Pi
ass
"No"
Total Acres_
"Monthly Reports^
yes
No
Emergency Warning H/A
"0 5 M Manual^ Mo
(2) Bar Screen
Preliminary equipment: (1) Lift Stations ^easuTement Ves
(3) Screenings Handled Mo _
Lagoon Description (PT^TDiagram °"s®®^a^ge 2) = Aerated —
Number and Type of Cells___ —^—
No
Effluent Handling: Chlorination_
, Flow Measurement Yes , Other
(5) Other
CELLS
fl
#2
#3
#4
n
Size, Acres
10
10
2
2.5
Operating
Depth, Ft.
3
3
4
4
'vadirig
i-bs. BOD/Acre
per Day
34
PE,/Acre/Day
General
Appearance
CD
S ©
s
s u
Dikes
"s CD
S QP
s QD
S ©
s u
Remarks (2) £
likes are erodinq badly
H 1 s <3?
Water 1
© U
© u
® u
s u
Remarks (3) population _ 12507 (10807)
Observations:
(4)
(1) Circle the appropriate answer
(2) Erosion, weathering, weeds, etc., need for repair (riprap, etc.) gg
(3) Clear, turbid, alpac, emergent vegetation (cattails, etc.)
-------
COMPLIANCE MONITO&XNG CHECKLIST
NAME-OF FACILITY
New Plymouth Laaoons
c/o Citv Hall
New Plymouth, Idaho
I. TYPE OF INSPECTION (OICCE ONE Oft MORE)
" K X Annual Compliance Lvajuation
2. Periodic Inspection
II. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
Required Action
Date: 8-7-75
inspector: Jon Wroten
Permit No: ID-002038-9
3. Discrepancy Inspection
4. Other
Scheduled Date
On Schedule
Behind Schec1;;!
Ill EVALUATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY
Yes
S
1. Operation and Maintenance
0 G H Manual Available
2. Sludge Handling Practices
3. Chlorination Equipraent (when applicable) S~
u X
KoT
u
IV.
FACILITY SAMPLING AS'D LABORATORY PROCEDURES
XI Sampling Locations S U
Sampling Procedures
2.
X
u
V. EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
1, Samples Collected
Crab _X
3. Effluent Appearance (check if visible)
Oil Grease X Suspended Solids
Yes X
24 'hrs. Co r.posite
VI. EFFLUENT LIMITATION'S VIOLATIONS
Indicated by Self-Monitoring Data
1. Permit Condition
4. Alternate Power Source
5. Flov/ Measurement Device
3. Analytical Procedures
4. Record Keeping
Yes
S
S
S
"2. Lab Results Attached Yes
Split Analysis with Facility
Settleable Solids
Self-Honitoring Data
Other
No
U "
U
u
No
Parameter
Average
Maximum
Average
Maximum
Date
*. PH
7.5
9.0
9.7
9.7
Juiv ir
b. S.S. (mq/L)
70
105
-
138
li i
e.
d.
Indicated by Survey
2. Permit Condition
Parameter
S.S. (mq/1)
Average
70
Maximum
105
Survey Data
Daily Average
89
Daily Maximum
154
b. S.S. (mq/1)
321
481
575
1049
d.
VII. RECEIVING WATER VIOLATIONS:
Yes
(attach lab results if sample taken)
VIII. SUMMARY OF EVALUATION
In Compliance:
Items not in Compliance:
X Effluent Limitations
Compliance Schcdulo
Other
Yes
No
No
Unknown
Operating Conditions
Water Quality Standards
Possible Non-Compliam-e;
Follow up needed by ____
IX. RECOWUNDATIONS;
No Action
Enforcement Action
Further Infommi
-------
COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT
Permi ttee:
NPDES Permit No:
Receiving Water:
Dates of Inspection:
Participants in Field Survey:
Participants in Meeting with City:
Facility Description:
Survey Description:
President,
Cambridge Sewer Association
P.O. Box 51
Cambridqe, Idaho 83610
TD-002180-6
March 26, 1974
December 31, 1976
Weiser River
Auqust 5, 6, and 7, 1975
William H. Clark, Idaho Department of
Health and Welfare, Division of Environment
Glen Davis, Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare, Division of Environment
James R. Hileman, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region X, Surveillance and Analysis
William H< Clark
Glen Davis
Jack Gardner, Mayor
The meeting was held on Auoust 7, 1975 in
City Hall. The permit was gone over with
the Mayor. The Mayor was well aware of the
permit and its conditions. It was suqqested
that we go over the permit with Steve Brown,
of J-U-B Engineers, Inc., the consulting
city engineer.
Stabilization Lagoon, three cells.
The major permit conditions wer discussed with
the Mayor and they were discussed in detail
with Steve Brown, J-U-B. Flow measurments
were made using the v-notch weir on the outfall
An ISCO automatic sampler (set to take a
sample every 20 minutes)was set un on the
effluent as it leaves the lagoon system. Two
24-hour composite samples were taken from
about 10:30 a.m. Auqust 5, 1975 to 9:45 a.m.
August 7, 1975. The survey on the 5th was
made with the assistance of James R. Hileman,
E.P.A. Nutrient samples were preserved with
H2SO4 and all other samples were cooled to 4°C
with ice. Temperature, dissolved oxygen,
specific conductance, and pH measurements
were taken with instruments while we were
present at the lagoons. Bacterial qrab samples
were iced and set up in E.P.A.'s mobile
laboratory in Ontario, Oregon. The other sampl
were also transported to tbe mobile lab.
101
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
November 28, 1975
Page 2
Purpose of Survey:
Summary of Findings:
To determine compliance with NPDES Permit.
The City was found to be in violation of
the permit in the following parameters:
1. Self-monitoring data showed that the
pH limitation of 9 was exceeded on two
dates: April 15, 1975 - 9.3
May 14, 1975 - 9.2
2. Discharge Monitoring Report E.P.A. Form
3320-1, had not be submitted to the State
of Idaho. This is now beinq done by
JUB.
3. Operation and Maintenance:
a. Cells covered with duckweed, probably
resulting in the very low dissolved
oxygent content of the effluent.
b. Tall weeds covered the dike area.
They had been killed, but were still
standing.
Permit Discussion
Participants in Meeting with Jr'U-B:
General Conditions:
SI. Effluent Limitations:
Jon Wroten, Idaho Department of Health and
Welfare, Division of Environment
William H. Clark, Idaho Department of Health
and Welfare, Division of Environment
Steve Brown, Consulting City Engineer, J-U-B
Engineers, Inc.
This meeting was held on August 22, 1975, at
the Region II Office, Division of Environment,
Boise, Idaho.
The general conditions were discussed and
understood by the City.
During the effective period of discharge,
March 26, 1975 through December 31, 1976,
the discharge shall be limited as follows:
(these were all understood by the City)
SI.a: The pH shall be between 6 and 9. Records showed that on
April 15, 1975 the pH was 9.3 and on May 15, 1975 the pH
was 9.2, resulting in noncompliance.
51.b: Effluent Concentrations
Eff1uent
Characteristics
Unit of
Measurement
102
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(5-day)
Susoend#»ri Solid?;
mg/1
mn/l
Daily
Average
60
70 *
Dally
Maximum
90
105
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
November 28, 1975
Page 3
Sl.b cont: Effluent Loadings
Sl.c:
Part S2,b:
Effluent
Characteristics
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(5-day)
Suspended Solids
Monitoring Requirements
Effluent
Characteristic
Total Flow
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(5-day)
Suspended Solids
Fecal Coliform Bacteria
pH
Unit of
Measurement
Daily
Average
kg/day (lb/day) 15 (33)
kg/day (lb/day) 18 (38)
Unit .of
Measurement
cmd (mgd)
mg/1
Sampli ng
Frequency
Conti nuous
Monthly
mq/1 Monthly
number/100 ml Monthly
pH units Weekly
Daily
Maximum
23 (50)
27 (58)
Type of
Sample
Recording
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Part S2.a:
The City understands that the City must submit by July 1
1976, a plan of study to insure compliance with secondary
treatment requirements, including:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The proposed planning area.
An identification of the entity or entities that will
be conducting the planning.
The nature and scoDe of the proposed SteD I project,
including a schedule for the completion of specific
tasks.
An itemized description of the estimated costs for
the project.
The City understands that it must submit to the issuing
authority required reports and a written notice of compliance
or noncompliance with the above schedule date. Each notice
of noncompliance shall include the following information:
1.
2,
A short description of the noncompliance.
A description of any actions taken or proposed by the
permittee to comply with the elapsed schedule reauire-
ment without further delay.
A description of any factors which tend to explain or
mitigate the noncompliance.
An estimate of the date permittee will comply with the
elapsed schedule requirement and an assessment of the
probability that permittee will meet the next scheduled
requirement on time.
103
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
November 28, 1975
Page 4
Part S3.a: The City understands that samnles and measurements taken to
meet the monitorina requirements specified above shall be
representative of the volume and nature of the monitored
discharge.
Part S3.b: The City understands that standard samplina and analytical
methods must be used to meet the monitorino requirements.
A report describing the methods used has been submitted.
Part S3.c: The City understands that samples and measurements taken to
meet the monitoring requirements specified above must be
taken in the effluent stream before it is discharged to the
receiving water.
Part S4,a: The City is making and maintaining records of all information
resulting from the monitoring activities required by this
permi t.
Part S4.c: The City understands that if it monitors any pollutant more
frequently than is required by the permit, that the informa-
tion shall be included in the Discharge Monitoring Report
form (EPA Form 3320-1).
Part S4.d: The City understands that it must retain for a minimum of
three years records of all monitoring activities and results
including all records of calibration and maintenance of
instrumentation and original recordings from continuous
monitoring instrumentation.
Part S5.a; The City understands that monitoring required by the permit
should be summarized and reported by submitting a Discharge
Monitoring Report form (E.P.A. Form 3320-1, 10-72), to:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
Attn: Permits Branch M/S 521
The City did not understand and has not submitted copies of
the Discharge Monitoring Report Form to this office:
Department of Health and Welfare
Division of Environment
Statehouse
Boise, Idaho 83720
The City now understands that the State of Idaho is to re-
ceive copies of the report. Part of the confusion was a
result of the E.P.A. report form consisting of only 2 pages
and one carbon.
104
-------
Compliance Mom'tori no Report
November 28, 1975
Page 5
Part S5.c: The City understands that the Discharoe Monitorinn Report
form shall be based on measurements and sampling carried out
durinq the orevious reporting period. The first report
submitted was for the period ending December 31, 1974. Report-
ing periods shall end on the last day of March, June, September
and December. The permittee shall submit a Discharqe Monitoring
Reoort postmarked no later than the 28th day of the month
followinq each quarterly reportinq oeriod.
Part S6: The City understands that it shall not allow oil and hazardous
substances in harmful quantities to,enter the treatment Plant.
If such substances enter the plant, the City shall insure that
they do not enter the receiving water.
Part S7: The City understands that it shall not discharge floatinq
solids or visible foam into the receiving water.
Part S8: The City understands that it must handle any accumulated solids
in an approved manner and that they shall be prevented from
entering navigable waters or their tributaries.
Part S9.a: The City understands that if for any reason it does not
comply with or will be unable to comply with an effluent
limitation specified in this permit, that it shall immediately
notify the permit issuing authority or its desinnee by tele-
phone at (206) 442-1200 and provide the following information
in writing within 5 days of such notification:
1. The cause of noncompliance.
2. A description of the noncomplyinq discharqe includina its
impact upon the receiving waters.
3. Anticipated time the condition of noncompliance is expected
to continue, or if such condition has been corrected
the duration of the period of noncompliance. '
4. Steps taken by the permittee to reduce and eliminate the
noncomplying discharge.
5. Steps to be taken by the permittee to prevent reoccurence
of the condition of noncompliance.
Part S9.b: The City understands that they shall take all reasonable steps
to minimize any adverse impact to navigable waters resulting
from noncompliance with any effluent limitation snecified in
this permit, including such accelerated or additional monitor-
ing as necessary to determine the nature and impact of the
noncomplying discharge.
Part S9.c: The City is aware that nothing in the permit shall be construed
to relieve them from civil or criminal penalties for non-
compliance.
Part S10: The City Is aware of this provision and has no record of by-
passing the treatment facility.
105
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
November 28, 1975
Pace 6
Part S11: The City has submitted the analytical quality control reDort.
Part S12: The City understands that it is responsible for the removal
of any shoaling resulting from the authorized discharge of
solid wastes in navigable waters if there is sufficient
accumulation to affect anchorage and navigation.
SURVEY RESULTS
Field Data August 5, 1975 August 6, 1975
Time
Flow (MGD)
Temperature (°C)
pH (S.U.)
D.O. (ma/J)
Specific Conductance
(Umhos)
1030
1030
1600
0.13
0.02
0.02
22.3
21.1
22.6
6.3
6.4
6.5
0.5
0.6
0
390
380
390
August 7, 1975
Time 0945
Flow (MGD) 0.06
Temperature (°C) 19.5
pH (S.U.) 6.5
D.O. (mg/1) 0
Specific Conductance 400
(JJmhos)
106
-------
Compliance Monitoring Report
November 28, 1975
Page 7
Laboratory Data
August 5-6, 1975
August 6-7, 1975
Dates (24-hour composite)
COD (mg/1)
T. ALK CaC03 (mg/1)
Total Residue (mg/1)
Total Vol* Residue (mg/1)
Total NFLT Residue (mg/1)
Vol. NFLT Residue (mq/1)
NHo - N Total (mg/1)
NO2 - N Total (mg/1)
NO3 - N Total (mg/1)
KJEL. N
T. Phos. (mg/1)
Dis. Phos. (mg/1)
O-PO4 (mg/1)
BOD20 (mg/1)
BOD5 (mg/1)
TOC (ma/1)
54
170
279
98
14
12
0.490
0.001
0.080
2.800
1,600
1.400
1.200
29.0
10.2
18.0
59
173
312
119
23
11
0.880
0.002
0.010
2.900
1,700
1.400
1.500
19.0
Dates (Grab Sample)
Fecal Collform Bacteria
Total Conform Bacteria
Fecal Streptococci
Fecal Coliform/Fecal Strep.
August 5, 1975
100
1500
200
ratio 0.5
August 6. 1975
20
1400
220
0.1
Comparative Data
BODr
August 6, 1975
SS( Residue TNFLT)
August 6, 1975
August 7, 1975
*Flow averaged for 3 days
Compliance Evaluation
rcq/1 lbs/da.y* '
3.4
10.2
14
23
4.7
7.7
Permit Conditions
/day
mq/1
60
70
70
15
18
18
Conclusions: The lagoons appear to be doing a good job of treating the
municipal waste waters. Items that should be corrected are
listed below under recommendations.
Recommendations:
1. That the pH be kept between 6 and 9.
2. Duckweed be removed.
3. Weeds be kept removed from the dikes.
4. Flow recording device be checked for accuracy.
107
-------
J10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Wl^tARE
Environmental Services Division
Boise, Idaho
Permit No. ID-002180-6
Name Cambridne Sewer Association Date Aunust 6, 1975
Location _ Cambridge, Idaho in Adams _Co.
Design: Capacity (lbs. BOD/Day) 144 Flow (mgd) 0.055
P.E. 40Q Total Acres 5.05 Emergency Warning N/A
By-Pass_ No Monthly Reports Yes O § M Manual ? No
Preliminary equipment: (1) Lift Stations Gravity (2) Bar Screen No
(3) Screenings Handled N/A (4) Influent Flow Measurement No (5) Other
Effluent Flow Measurement = Stevens Water Leva! Recorder (new)
Lagoon Description (Flow Diagram on Back Page 2) : Aerated No
Number and Type of Cells 3 standard
Effluent Handling: Chlorination No » Flow Measurement Yes » Other
CELLS
#1
82
#3
#4
#5
Size, Acres
4.25
0.4
0.4
Operating
Depth, Ft.
5
5
5
Loading
Lbs. BOD/Acre
per Day
34
PE,/Acre/Day.
General
Appearance
(A)
S ®
s (u)
S ®
s u
s u
Dikes
(§) U
CD U
GD U
s u
s u
Remarks (b) Cattails qone. Weeds all over bank and Dyke. Sprayed but not removed
Water
s u
s . u
s u
s u
s u
Remarks (c) all three cells covered with duckweed.
Observations:
(D)
(A) Cixcle the appropriate answer (Satisfactory - Unsatisfactory)
(B) Erosion, weathering, weeds, etc., need for repair (riprap, etc.)
(C) Clear, turbid, algae, emergent vegetation (cattails, etc.) 108
(D) Describe final effluent and other pertinent information.
-------
Division of Environmental Services
COHPL 1 CE MONITORING CKB«* LIST
NAME OF FACILITY
Cambridoe Sewer Asseciation
P.O. Box 51
Cambridoe, Idaho 83610
T. type OF INSPECTION (aiF.CK ONE OR MORE)
1. X, Annual Compliance Evaluation
2. Periodic Inspection
II. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE
Required Action
Date:
Inspcctdr:
Permit Ho:
August 6, 1975
Willi am Clark & Glenn Davis
ID-002180-6.
J; survey
Scheduled Date
On Schedule
Behind Schedule
III,
VI.
EVALUATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY
1. Operation and Maintenance S
0 5 H Manual Available Yes __
2. Sludge Handling Practices S
S. Chlorination Equipment (when applicable}
U
No"
U
X
X
-N/A
IV. FACILITY SAMPLING AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES
J. Sampling Locations S * U
2. Sampling Procedures S X' U
V. EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
Yes X No
"hrs. Composite
1. Samples Collected_
Grab 2 24
3. Effluent Appearance (check if visible)
Oil - VY * J-J
1 BHV.C Vv *
Grease aA Suspended Solids
EFFLUENT LIMITATION'S VIOLATIONS
Indicated by Self-Monitoring
Permit Condition
Parameter
Maximum
J*L
b.
pH
6
4. Alternate Power Source
5. Flow Measurement Device
N/A
Yes
s 5T
5. Analytical Procedures
4. Record Keeping
S
s
2. Lab Results Attached Yes
Split Analysis with Facility
Settleable Solids Other
Self-ttonitoring Data
Average Maximum
No
a '
v
u
N/A
No
9.3
9.2
5-14-75
VIII.
d.
Indicated by Survey
2. Permit Condition
Parameter
Average
Maximum
a.
b.
c.
VII. RECEIVING WATER VIOLATIONS;
Yes
(attach lab results if sample taken)
SUMMARY OF EVALUATION
In Compliance:
Iteas not in Compliance:
Effluent Limitations
Compliance Schedule
Other
Yes
No
No
Survey Data
Dally Average
Daily Maxiwuw
Unknown
Operating Conditions
Water Quality Standards
Possible Non-Compliance;
Follow up needed by
IK. RECOWENDATIONS:
_No Action
Improved 0 8 M
REMARKS: (number section remark refers to)
Enforcement Action
' Revise Pernit
Further Information
Follow up Letter
109
-------
no
-------
APPENDIX B
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
177
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT FOR THE PAYETTE-WEISER SURVEY
Conducted November 1975
Surtmary
The quality assurance activities for this survey are intended to
"quantify the data" or determine the quality of data by checking a
percentage of the total samples and making a statistical inference
about the total samples.
Based on 7% of the total sanples being collected and analyzed
as quality assurance samples, the statement can be made that at a
95% confidence level 64% of all of the sanple concentrations will fall
within the following control limits:
Parameter Control Limits
Diss. Ortho Phos. <_ + 20%
n-nc>3 + N02 < i 2%
N-NH3 < + 20%
Discussion
The objective of quality assurance (QA) is to ensure the validity
of survey data. Quality assurance considerations begin at the time
of sanple collection and do not end until the data is verified on the
STORET printout. The quality assurance activity during this survey
determined the overall accuracy or quality of the sanple results.
During the survey 7% of all samples were collected for Q.A.
purposes in accordance with the methods presented in the quality
assurance plan for the survey. The Q.A. samples were spiked in the
field with known concentrations of ortho phosphate, nitrate-nitrite,
and airmonia to determine the net effect of interferences from time
of collection to time of analysis. These effects are measured by
comparing the expected to the observed or actual concentration and
calculating the percent recovery for each spiked sanple. The data
are found in the attached table.
Percent recovery for each of the Q.A. samples collected is a
measure of the accuracy of the results from which a mean and standard
deviation can be computed. The average low and high spike percent
recovery and standard deviation for each of the parameters checked is:
High Spike Mean % Standard Low Spike Mean % Standard
Parameter Concent. Recovery Deviation Concentration Recovery Deviation
D. Ortho Ph. .20 mg/1 93% 5% .05 mg/1 "87% "~To^
N--NO3 + NO2 .50 98 1 .10 100 0
N-NH3 .20 104 6 . 05 109 10
113
-------
The laboratory accuracy (spiking) data expressed in standard
deviations cannot be compared to the field spiking accuracy data,
because laboratory spiked data will have smaller deviations than
field spiked data. The first is an indication of laboratory
performance during the analysis and the second is an indication
of the deterioration and/or effect of interference on the sample
from time of collection to time of analysis. Both statistics are
important, however, they cannot be compared to each other.
A statistical inference about the total data quality (data
quality statement) can be made based on field spiking a percentage
of the total samples and determining the percent recovery of these
spiked samples. (Reference guidelines for development of a quality
assurance program, EPA-R4-73-028a). The control limits for the
total sample population at a 95% confidence level for the spiked
samples collected during this survey was:
Based on field spiking 7% of the total sanples during this_survey a
data quality statement can be made that 64% of the'^samples
would fall within these limits. This does not mean that the other
36% are outside these control limits but a statistical inference
about this additional data cannot be made. The quality assurance
data for this survey is shown in the attached table. If 10% of the
total samples had been field spiked an inference or data quality
statement could have been made about 76% of the total sanples. If 20%
of the sanples were field spiked a data quality statement could be
made about 86% of the total sanples. Increasing the number of quality
assurance sanples compared to the total number of samples enables a
more inclusive statement to be made about the total data quality.
A portion of the quality assurance sanples can also be included as
a normal sample for data interpretation purposes. The quality
assurance sample is simply a larger volume sample which is split into
3 aliquates:
1. A base sample,
2. High spike, and
3. Low spike
The base sample is the untreated portion which can be considered
as a regular sample.
Recomnendat ions
It is recommended that confidence limits be determined for all
future survey results. It is essential to know the confidence that
can be placed in survey results to properly interpret data. Field
sanples may be exposed to a variety of sources of interference during
their collection and transport to the laboratory. The sanples are
Diss. Ortho Phos.
N-NOo + NOo
N-NH3
Parameter
Control Limits
< + 20%
< + 2%
< + 20%
114
-------
also subjected to more potential sources of interference during sample
preparation, In some cases, samples may deteriorate between time of
collection and time of analysis. Therefore, it is important to
determine the overall accuracy of the sairple values. Accuracy is
defined as the difference between the observed concentration value
and the actual value.
115
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SHEET FOR PAYETTE-WEISER SURVEY
% Recovery
Parameter Sample No. Low Spike High Spike
Diss. Ortho Phos. 49552 100% 100%
N-NOo & NOo " 100 99
N-NH3 " 117 110
Diss. Qrtho Phos. 49553 100 97
N-NO3 & NO2 " 100 99
N-NH3 " 114 100
Diss. Ortho Phos. 49556 82 86
N-NO3 & NO2 '» 100 100
N-NH3 " 94 94
Diss. Ortho Phos. 49558 80 90
N-NO3 & NO2 " 100 97
N-NH3 M 113 107
Diss. Ortho Phos. 49654 80 95
N-NO3 & N02 " 100 98
N-NH3 " 100 100
Diss. Ortho Phos. 49661 80 90
N-NO3 & N02 " 100 100
N-NH3 " 117 110
116
-------
APPENDIX C
BIOLOGICAL DATA
117
-------
BIOLOGICAL DATA
PAYETTE RIVER
At Montour
Station 1
At Letha
At Fruitland*
3a
3b
At Payette*
4a 4b-
Group 1
Trichoptera
Oecetis
Lepidostomfl
Glossoma
Limnephilus
Heliopsyche
Cheumatopsyche
Ochrotrichia
Hydropsyche
A
Leucotrichia
Protoptila
Epheneroptera
Baetis
Paraleptophleb ia
Ephemerella
Rhithrogenia
Cinygma
Stenonema
Tricorythodes
Plecoptera
Pteronarcys
Chloroperla
Eucapnopsis
Odonata
Ischnura
Ophiogomphus
Argia
Group 2
Chironomidae
Cricotopus
Nanoclaudius
Tanypodinae
Prodiamesa
Microtendipes
Tanytaraus
Diamesa
Psectroclaudius
Corynoneura
1
6
1
14
37
38
105
37
8
16
141
6
26
153
10
5
616
139
1744
2
1
48
33
223
1
6
8
1
3
1
42
5
156
9
174
21
15
5
126
15
9
2
285
15
39
21
128
12
219
151
322
12
11
103
173
910
6
21
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
21
80
22
60
31
138
40
1
5
28
13
35
4
1
1
3
2
3
11
1
64
4
3
11
11
8
21
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
* Duplicate samples obtained.
119
-------
BIOLOGICAL DATA
PAYETTE RIVER cont.
At Montour
Station
At Letha At Fruitland*
3a
3b
At Payette*
4a 4b
Group 2 cont.
Chironomus (Endochironomus)
Chironomus
Polypedilum
Chironomus (Tribelos)
Gastropoda
Ferissia 6
Physa
Hirudenia
Erpobdella
Group 3
Oligochaeta 65
Other (ungrouped)
Diptera
Antocha
Atherix
Empedidae
Simuliidae
Coleoptera
Ancyronyx
Cepidoptera
Elophila
Turbellaria
Hydracarina
6
2
1
37
1
1
2
1
1
12
44
11
2
3
14
1
22
7
35
34
18
4
1
1
20
45
32
19
35
Group 1
2
3
Total ///Sample
3,
2
3a
3b
4a
4b
449
223
48
1516
565
3662
171
100
40
121
79
246
65
37
4
44
1
20
* Duplicate samples obtained.
120
-------
BIOLOGICAL DATA
WEISER RIVER
Below Tamarack* Above Mesa Above Midvale
Station la Ik. 1 1
Group I
Trichoptera
Heliopsyche 92 72
Hydropsyche 141 22 406 3
Cheumatopsyche 526 1
Ochrotrichia ^
Leptocella 3
Oecetis 9
Brachycentaus 1
Ephemeroptera
Baetls 10 10 11 1
Ironopsis 19 4
Ephemerella 71 188 49 1
Trlcorythodes 4 10 7
Paraleptophlebia 4
Rhithrogenia 10 1
Stenonema 4
Plecoptera
Brachyptera 2
Pteronarcys -2
Chloropherla 9
Nemoura 2
Megaloptera
Slalls 1
Odonata
Hyponeura 1
Group 2
Chlronomldae
Psectroclaudius 2 1
Cardloclaudlus 2
Tatiypodinae 14 10 2 1
Cricotopus 69 15 31
Diamesa 9
Brillia 3
Chironomus 1
Prodlamesa 10
Tanytarsua 5 1
Microtendipes 5
Nanoclaudius 1
* Duplicate samples obtained.
121
-------
BIOLOGICAL DATA
WEISER RIVER cont.
Below Tamarack*
Station la
lb
Above Mesa
Above Midvale
Group 2 cont.
Gastropoda
Lymaea
Ferissia
Gyraulus
Physa
Group 3
Oligochaeta
Other (ungrouped)
Diptera
Atherix
Holoruisa
Antocha
Coleoptera
Ancyronyx
Psephenus
Lepidoptera
Elophila
Turkellaria
20
7
12
150
8
3
2
35
30
20
1
13
61
1
13
30
1
10
2
1
2
Total 0/Sample
Station la lb 2
Group 1
2
3
333
276
6
233
86
30
1124
54
17
13
61
* Duplicate samples obtained.
122
-------
APPENDIX D
WATER QUALITY DATA
November 1971
123
-------
SUMMAXT OF FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND (SEMICAL DATA
AT .SELECTED STATIONS ON THE PAYETTE RIVER
NOVEMBER 4-10, 1971
Alkalinity
Hap Station Flow Trap. Cond. Pis solved Oxygen og/1 as BOD TOC Kj HHt NO? + NOt Total P
Key Description cfa *C yrahos/ai pH ag/1 Z Sat. CaCO? ag/1 ng/1 »g/l as 8 me/1
35 Payette River Range 890-1020 2.0-5.0 130-160 7.4-8.7 10.5-12.8 88-109 34-49 <2-3.8 2-4 <0.1-0.4 . 0.04-0.10 0.02-0.07
Emnett Average 977 12.2 102 39 3.4 3 0.3 <0.1- 0.07 0.05
(KM 365.6/33.3)
W
34 Payette River, Range 4.0<-5.0 130-170 8.2-8.5 11.8-12.9 100-108 34-47 . 2-3 0.1- . 0.04-0.05 0.03-0.04
dovnetreaa from Average 12.4 105 40 <2^ 3 <0.1— 0.04 0.03
(RM 365.6/32.0)
33 Payette River Range 800-900 2.0-5.0 150-180 7.4-8.8 10.8-13.8 91-118 39-53 <2-4.2 2-5 <0.1-1.0 . 0.04-0.10 0.03-0.05
at Letha Bridge Average 850 12.2 101 46 3.1 3 0.6 <0.1— 0.06 0.04
(RM 365.6/28.0)
32 Payette River Range 800-1400 2.0-7.0 200-260 7.9-8.7 10.8-13.0 93-111 67-79 , 2-3 l.<£7 .. 0.09-0.19 0.02-0.09
at Hew Plymouth Average 1100 11.9 101 73 <2- 2 <0.1— 0.14 0.06
(RM 365.6/23.5)
b/
30 Payette River Range 1050-1680 4.0-7.0 250-290 8.0-8.6 11.2-12.8 96-107 73-177 <2-2.8 2-5 0.2- . 0.14-0.23 <0.01-0.06
at Payette Average 1360 11.9 102 108 2.8 3 <0.1— 0.18 0,05
(RM 366.6/4.1)
a/ All values arc equal.
]tf All other values were lea* than detectable.
c/ This station was also saapled during the period October 27-Noveaber 2, 1971.
-------
Simm OF FIELD KASUKMEHTS MO CHEMICAL DATA AT SELECTED STATIONS
SNAKE RIVER BASIN - WALTERS FERRY TO DOWNSTREAM FROM WEISER, IDAHO
OCTOBER 27-N0VEMBER 2. 1971
Nap Key Station Description
RTiaTTnTty-
Temp. Cond, pH Dissolved Oxygen mg/1 as
°C |imhos/cm S. U. nig/1 1 Sat. CaCO.
TOC
mg/1 «g/l
mg/1 asT
T7
Total P
NH
'JL
30 Payette R1ver~^at
Payette
(RM 365.6/4.1)
29 Payette River
near mouth
(RM 365.6/0.1)
33 Snake River, down-
stream from the
Payette River
(RH 364.0)
34 Snake River, up-
stream of Uelser
River (RH 353.9)
35 Helser River
near mouth
(RH 351.8/0.1)
36 Snake River, down-
stream from
HelserS'
(RH 350.3)
AVERAGE 11.4 98 72
RANGE 4.0-7.0 T90-280 7.3-8.0 10.0-12.2 94-107 64-78
AVERAGE 10.0 89 128
RANGE 4.5-8.0 320-490 8.5-8.9 7.0-11.0 59-99 73-163
AVERAGE 11.0 98 184
RANGE 6.0-8.0 450-560 7.0-8.8 10.4-11.7 93-104 179-198
AVERAGE 10.6 96 180
RANGE 6.0-8.0 500-540 7.6-8.7 10.2-11.0 94-98 176-186
AVERAGE H.8 97 95
RANGE 2.0-7.0 200-360 7.5-8.3 10.0-13.2 82-112 78-112
AVERAGE W.9 97 177
RANGE 5.0-10.0 480-575 7.2-8.7 10.1-11.6 93-104 168-183
a/ All values are the sane.
5/ This station was also sampled during the period of November 4-10, 197-1.
cj All values except one were less than detectable.
3/ All values except one were <2.
e/ Strea* flow at USGS gaging station near Uelser (RH 351.3) averaged 25,200 cfs during the survey.
fj All values recorded as "less than* have not been used to calculate average.
2.4 . 2.1 <0.1"
<2-2.7 1.0-6.0
& 0.19 0.05
<0.1-0.1 0.13-0.25 <0.01-0.10
2.5 2.6 O.t
<2-3.3 2,0-4.0 <0.1-0.2
<0.1^ 0.48
0.05
0.30-0.63 0.01-0.08
3.0 2.8 0.2 0.89
2.4-4.9 1.0-4.0 0.1-0.4 <0.1-0.10.65-1.55
2.9 -3.5 0.2 & 0.71
2.0-3.8 1-6 <0.1-0.3 <0.1-0.1 0.60-0.75
0.07
0.06-0.06
0.06
0.05-0.08
H 2
<2-2.1 1-3 <0.1-0.1
<0.1^ 0.12
0.04
0.08-0.19 <0.01-0.08
4.0 3.6 0.2 & 1.03 0.07
<2-3.6 V-6 <0.1-0.5 <0.1-0.1 0.60-2.30 0.03-0.14
-------
RESULTS OF BACTERIOLOGICAL AHALYSES AT SELECTED STATIONS
PAYETTE RIVER STREAM SURVEY
November 4-10, 1971
Hap Station Description
Key
Total Conforms Fecal Coltforms Fecal Streptococci
HF Count/100 in) % Samples HF Count/IQO ml MF Count/100 ml
Maximum Mean— Minimum > 2,400 Haxlnum MeanS; Minimum Max!mum MeanSr Minimum
35 Payette River, upstream of Emett
(RM 365.6/33.3)
34 Payette River, downstream from Eaaett
(RH 365.6/32.0)
33 Payette River at Letha Bridge
(RM 365.6/28.0)
30 Payette River at Payette
-------
":S OF "¦VrnRIOLOGItAL ANALYSES AT SELECTED STATIONS
SHAKE RIVER BASIN STREAM SURVEY
October 27-November 2
1971
Hap
Key
Station Description
Total Conform
MF Count/1Q0 ml
Maximum Mean!/ Minimum
t Samples
L 2.400
Fecal Collforats
HF Count/100 ml
Max! mum fleani M
inlnuni
Fecal Streptococci
MF Count/IQO nl
Maximum Nean^- Minimum
1
Snake River at Waiters Ferry (RM 442-5)
3,400
1,400
220
33-3
1,000
ISO
8
15,000
4,800
64
4
Snake River at Adrian (RH 401.8)
6,600
2,200
150
28.5
32
17
<10
>10,000
2,900
210
5
Owyhee River near Mouth {RH 392.3/2.9)
6,300.
1,700
HO
28:6
140
74
30
9,300
1,900
450
7
Boise River at Parma (RH 391-3/5-0)
130,000
5,300
2,800
100
130,000
23,000
690
110,000
27,000
700
6
Boise River near Houth (RH 391-3/0.1)
>80,000
37,000
' ,900
83.3
130,000
29,000
110
87,000
14,000
190
22
Snake River, downstream from Mouth of
the Boise River (RH 390.5)
120,000
33,000
100
57.1
74,000
21,000
<4
2,700
800
70
23
Snake River, upstream of Hyssa (RM 389.0}
52,000
8,900
90
28.6
460
130
<4
2,000
490
40
24
Snake River, downstream from Nyssa (RM 387.0)
7,300
2,800
480
28.6
1,600
440
24
560
310
130
25
Snake River, upstream of Ontario (RM 373.0)
5,600
3,800
1,900
66.7
200
160
120
2,600
1,800
1,200
26
27
Snake River, upstream of Malheur RJvfer
(RM 369.0)
Malheur River near Houth (RM 368.5/0.1)
92,000
5,200
19,000
1,000
1,300
120
71.4
14.3
1,500
100
440
51
40
8
7,700
5,900
3.300
1,500
480
570
28
Snake"River, upstream of the Payette River
(RH 367.0)
4,300
3,900
3,500
100
760
470
180
3,900
3,900
3,900
30
Payette River at Payette (RM 365.6/4.1)
2,900
930
290
14
8B
64
16
4,500
1,500
100
29
Payette River at Mouth (RM 365.6/0.1)
3,800
9,600
330
40
1,000
270
40
29,000
5,000
530
-------
RESULTS OF BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES AT SELECTED STATIONS
SNAKE RIVER BASIN STREAM SURVEY
October 27'November 2
1971
Hap Station Description
Jto
Total Conforms Fecal Conforms Fecal Streptococci
MF Count/100 ml % Samples HF Count/100 ml' MF Count/1QO ml
haKlmum Mean!/ Minimum — 2.400 Wax t mum Hean^- Minimum Maximum ¦ HeanS' Minimum
36 Snake River at Idaho 52 Bridge (RM 364.0)
37 Snake River, upstream of the Wefser River
(RM 353.9)
38 Melser River at Mobth (RM 351.8/1.0)
39 Snake River, downstream fron the kelser
River (RM 350.3)
24,000 3,600 2.800 100
29,000 9.700
2.800 1,100
27.000
8.500
1,500
130
2,200
50
28.5
80
840
530
100
310
380
220
46
200
50 4,000
88
2,400
<4 17,000
56 6,100
3., 000
1.4no
2,700
3,000
1,900
580
200
770
af Values reported as "<" are not used 1n calculating.the nean.
t\5
V0
-------
APPENDIX E
1975 SURVEY DATA
131
-------
» STATION Hit*E t Lia I STREAM I *ATEfi ( TuRB tCfcOUCTVYICM1UCTVYI DO I 300 I 800 I T &LK »
• LAT - LONG I IDENT. I FLOW i TEMP I JKSN (FIELD I AT 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAT t CACC3 ®
* STQPET a DATE TIME OEPTHI NUMBER I CFS 1 CENT I JTU IMICROMrtOtMICROMHOI MG/L I MO/L I KG/L I H&/L •
9ft4fi444«C44««f444«4«9«44444444«4444««ft«4««444444«44»4««4ft444ft4«4ft4««44««4«444«t44444«4ft«»«fi«fr»44*4444«44444ft»4«<4«444«44t»*444Bfl«444
CITY Or PAYETTE STP
44 05 01.0 116 57 05.0 2
*153752
CO
U>
75/06/04
1600
0001
3P76S
3.2J
2.3
75/08/05
0*15
0001
32773
3.2J
75/08/04
1630
C0»»P
32729
3.2
62.0
75/08/05
1450
1500
0001
32751
3.2 J
21.3
40.0
1000
4.4
96.0
75/03/06
0920
0001
32774
3.2 J
1305
0001
32756
3.2J
20.4
42.0
775
3.6
75/06/05
1455
CO^P
32704
3.2
22.0
75/08/06
1335
7S/03/07
0840
0001
32775
3.2J
75/0S/06
1340
COvP
32724
3.2
35.0
75/08/07
1300
1310
0001
32761
3.2 J
20.7
28.0
950
5.8
1312
0001
32714
3.2J
75/12/02
1300
0003
1.7J
94.0
1400
0001
2.2
1500
0001
2.4
1600
0001
2.1
1700
0001
2.6
1B00
0001
2.0
19(10
0001
2.0
2000
0001
1.9
2100
0001
1.8
2200
0001
1.8
2300
0001
1.8
2hD0
0001
1.5
75/12/03
0100
0001
1.4
0200
oom
1.3
0300
0001
1.1
0400
0001
1.0
0500
0001
1.0
0600
0001
1.0
0700
0001
1.0
,0 2
75/12/03
0800
0001
1.5
0900
0001
1.9
10O0
0001
1.9
1100
0001
2.0
1200
0001
49801
1.7 J
1200
0003
1. 7 J
127.0
75/12/02
1300
COxP
49800
1.7
0003
1.7J
75/12/03
1200
21S
207
217
CITY CF PAYETTE STP
4ft 05 01.0 116 57
#153752
-------
«««««««««««•««»«««««««««««o»e«e**«« «««o«o««««4«o»«fteoe»«e««e«ea«»c>eoe«e««*««««««
STATION name I LAB I STREAM t WATER I TURB ICNDUCTVYICnDUCTVY I DO I 800 I BCD I T ALK ¦»
LAT - LONG I 1DENT. I FLOW I TEMP I JKSN IFIELO I AT 25C I I -5 DAY I 20 DAY I C£CC3 *
STOBET # OATE TIME OEPTHl NUMBER I CFS I CENT I JTU IMICROMHOIMICROMMOI MGA. I MG/L I MG/L t MG/L »
49 SLOUGH AT KlrfANlS PAPK
44 04 05.0 116 56 07.0 I
#153705
75/0O/04
1330
0001
26.0
75/08/05
1635
0003
32324
26.OJ
24.5
9.8
310
1.9
75/06/06
1445
0003
32351
26.OJ
24.1
11.0
280
7.9
2.0
116
1500
0003
32452
26.OJ
24.0
12.0
310
7.9
75/06/07
1540
0003
32377
26.OJ
21.5
9»6
300
7.9
1.7
112
1550
0003
3?465
26.OJ
21.5
3.1
HO
7^/12/02
0910
0003
49500
5.0J
4.3
625
9.6
2.5
237
75/12/04
0830
0003
49552
5.0 J
PAYETTE H P PAYETTE (KIWanIS PK)
44 03 35.0 116 56 04.0 1
*153704
75/08/04
0003
32001
7S/0H/05
1625
0003
32323
1510.0
24.5
7.0
165
1.6
75/08/06
1515
0003
32350
1510.0
24.0
6.7
160
11.4
1.1
75
75/08/07
1605
0003
32376
1520.0
21.8
6.2
220
11.4
1.2
75
75/12/02
0920
0003
49501
2160.OJ
205
80
0925
0003
49502
2160.OJ
3.3
11.4
1.2
4.2 89
0930
0003
49503
2160.OJ
SO
75/12/03
0003
3230.OJ
75/12/04
0003
3240.OJ
Payette a * payettf i hwy <35 >
44 OS 33.0 116 55 28.0 1
#153703
75/08/04
0003
32002
75/08/05
1610
0003
32322
1530.0
24.0
7.0
150
10.5
75/08/06
1530
0003
32349
1530.0
23.8
7.3
170
11.0
75
75/08/07
1630
0003
3237S
1540.0
21.5
6.1
21S
10.8
74
75/12/02
1030
0003
49504
2160.0
205
76
1035
0003
49505
3230.0
3.5
11.9
1.2 4.2 73
1040
0003
49506
3240.0
74
CITY "OF FRUITLAND STP LAGOON #2
44 02 15.0 116 55 32.0 2,
#153753
75/08/05
1015
1000
0001
32752
23.4
15.0
800
11.5
39.0
COKP
32703
0.2J
16.0
342
75/06/06
0940
1000
0001
32757
23.9
17.0
800
11.4
0950
COMP
32723
0.2 J
30.0
348
75/08/07
0850
1005
0001
32713
1230
0001
32762
24.0
20.0
950
15.8
75/12/02
1100
0003
49507
0.1J
950
391
1103
0003
49508
2.3
12.5
54.0
390
1106
0003
49509
0.1J
393
-------
« STA TIOfJ NAtfE I L48 I STREAM I WATER I TUKB ICNDUCTVYICNOUCTVY I DO t SOQ I SOD I T Al* «
« L "T - LONG I IDENT. I FLOta I TEMP I JKSN I FIELD I' AT 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CACC3 •
• STORET » DATE TIME OEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I CENT I JTU IMICROMHOIMICROMHOI MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L *
»49ft«4«fi«44e4«44fi44«S4fi44644«4«it«ft««44««4t»444444ft4»44444
-------
1355
0.5
CO
cr»
-------
• station name
1
LAB 1
STREAM 1
WATER 1
TURS
1 CNDUCTVY i CNDltCTVY 1
DO t
BOD 1 BOD 1
T ALK
* LAT - LOt.r,
1
IDENT. 1
FLOW 1
TEMP 1
JKSN
IFIELO i
AT 25C 1
1
5 DAY i 20 OAY 1
CACC3 '
» STOkET * CATt T!^E DEPTH!
NUMBER 1
CFS 1
CENT 1
JTU
IMICSOMHOIHICSOMHOI
MG/L 1
MG/L 1 HG/L 1
MG/L
D3AIN S SIDE PAYETTE R. !mm 9.7)
44 00 39.0 116 50 10.0 4
*153697 75/03/04
1445
0003
17. 2J
1545
17.2
75/08/05
1^45
0003
3P316
17.OJ
22.0
22.0
440
8.9
75/08/06
1535
0003
3234 3
17.2J
22.6
45.0
405
8.5
163
75/03/07
1525
0003
32369
17.2J
20.9
29.0
400
9.5
163
75/12/04
0935
0003
49557
2.7 J
8.4
1350
2.7
SSti'i U SIDE PAYETTE H (Rw 9.s>
i.4 00 4 3.0 116 50 03.0 4
* ! <5"i7Aa /5/0fc/ 51.0 4
#153696 75/08/04
1555
4.0
75/06/05
1440
0003
32315
4.0J
21.4
24.0
800
11.2
75/03/06
1525
0 003
32342
4.0J
21.5
32.0
500
11.1
242
75/08/07
1520
0003
32368
4. 0 J
19.2
16.0
750
12.5
230
fi?« PLYMOUTH STP
43 59 00.0 116 47 00.0 2
#153755 75/08/05
1115
0001
32753
1.2 J
23.5
62.0
500
6.2
5.2
1110
•
COMP
1.3J
5.5
192
75/OB/06
1055
1115
0001
32758
23.4
70.0
560
7.0
1110
cc yp
32721
1.2J
6.6
213
75/08/07
1105
1118
0001
32711
1.1J
1135
0001
32763
1.1J
22.0
72.0
650
7.1
75/12/03
1610
0003
0.2J
443
1615
0003
3.9
446
11.2K
1620
0003
0.2J
546
CEMETFkY DRAIN NR NEW PLYMOUTH
43 53 44.0 116 47 53.0 4
#153695 75/08/05
0910
39.9
1420
0003
32314
39.9J
20.8
22.0
340
8.2
75/08/06
1500
0003
32341
39.9J
20.5
12.0
315
8.0
124
75/03/07
1450
0003
32367
39.9J
19.2
8.7
320
6.1
122
1500
0003
40.OJ
10.0
330
1.0
126
75/12/03
1555
0003
49546
28.OJ
12.5
651
75/12/0-4
1330
28.0
payette r. c «riLL0rf cs. rd. sr.
43 59 26.0 116 47 42.0 4
#153694 75/08/05
1130
1297.0
1405
0003
32313
1297.OJ
21.7
5.1
160
11.0
1.7
75/08/06
1445
0003
32340
1297.OJ
22.0
4.6
150
10.9
2.3
63
75/08/07
1425
0003
32366
1297.OJ
20.0
3.9
150
10.7
2.5
63
75/12/03
1520
0003
4954S
3580.OJ
118
1525
0003
49546
3580.0J
2.8
109
14.4
0.7 2.1
-------
1530 0003 <.9547 35B0.0J 109
75/12/04 1145 0003 3580.0
co
00
-------
* STATION M«E I LA8 I STREAM I UATER I TURB ICNDUCTVYICNDUCTV YI DO I SOD I BOD I T ALK
• LAT - LONG i IOENT. I FLOW i TEMP I JKSN IF1ELQ I AT 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CACC3
» STOSET t GATE TIME DEPTH I NUM8ER I CFS I CENT I JTU ImICROMHOIMICROMHOI MG/L I MG/L I KG/L I HG/L
DRAIN S 6NK PAYETTE W (R» 13.4)
43 58 51.0 116 47 10.0 4
¦»153740 75/08/0S 1420 0003 32610 17.0 20.4 230 8.0 135
GRAIN S 0\K PAYETTF P (Pf 13.42)
43 53 50.0 116 47 03.fi 4
*1537 35 75/0(3/05 1415 0003 32609 3.0 27.5 120 3.6 171
payette fi nk new Plymouth hwy 52
43 56 09.0 116 46 30.C 4
75/0S/05
1345
0003
32312
1315.OJ
21.0
5.2
180
10.0
1.5
75/06/06
1430
0003
32339
1315.OJ
21.7
6.5
170
10.2
1.1
2.4
68
75/03/07
1410
0003
32365
1315.OJ
19.5
4.5
160
10.3
1.2
2.6
72
75/12/03
1500
0003
49542
3530.OJ
122
1505
0003
49543
3560.OJ
3.7
118
CO
*
1510
0003
49544
3580.OJ
101
drain s 6nk payette r. (r» 15.3)
43 57 50.0 116 45 42.
*153706
CO
UD
0 4
75/08/05 1230
1330 0003 32325
7S/08/06 1420 0003 32338
75/08/07 1400 0003 32364
75/12/03 1445 0003 49541
75/12/04 1310
8.7
8.7J
21.5
9.0
300
7.4
8 . 7 J
22.1
4.7
290
8.2
125
6.7J
19.9
3.4
300
8-6
126
3.0J
9.9
531
3 . 0 J
ORA IN NP HAMILTON COPNEP RM15.7
43 57 36.0 116 45 23.0 4
75/08/05
1245
40.2
1315
0003
32311
40.OJ
19.4
14.0
460
8.8
75/08/06
1405
0003
32337
40.OJ
19.8
16.0
450
9.2
157
75/08/07
1340
0003
32363
40.OJ
ia.o
13.0
420
7.8
159
1350
0003
40.OJ
14.0
460
7.8
160
75/12/03
1440
0003
49540
15.OJ
14.0
625
75/12/04
1300
15.0
B LATERAL 1MI E HAMILTON CORNER
43 57 09.0 116 44 56.0 4
•153691
75/07/22
1635
0001
30728
30.0
1000K
75/06/05
1215
0003
32310
118.6J
19.0
8.2
330
8.4
1.6
1300
118.6
75/0*/06
1245
0003
32336
11S.6J
19.1
11.0
330
9.1
1.9
139
75/08/07
1240
0003
32362
118.6J
17.6
7.3
320
9.2
1.1
142
75/12/03
1425
0003
49538
38.OJ
12.6
366
11.0
0.8
1430
0003
49539
38.OJ
366
75/12/04
1440
0003
38.0
PAYETtE 15. « FALK bpidge
43 57 16.0 116 43 00.0 4
75/08/05
1200
0003
32309
1210.OJ
19.5
5.5
110
8.7
1.4
75/08/06
1225
0003
32335
1210.OJ
20.5
4.5
105
9.4
0.8
1.9
40
75/08/07
1210
0003
32361
1210.OJ
18.3
3.0
95
9.4
0.8
1.8
48
75/12/03
1340
0003
49535
3150.OJ
99
1345
0003
49536
3150.OJ
2.2
99
14.9
0.7
1.8
1350
0003
49537
3150.OJ
100
-------
"• STaTICn ».Am£ I LAB I STREAM I *AT£h I TUPfl I CNDuC T V VI C\OUC T V Y i DO I SOD I SOO I T AL". •
* LAT - LOsr, I IQfcNT. I FLO» I TEMP I JKSN IFIELD I Al 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CACC3 *
• STOsET # DATE TIME CEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I CENT I JTU IMICROMHOIHICROMHO! MG/L I MG/L t MG/L i HiG/L *
d»a:n E b'<< payettf p. ie.9)
43 56 39.0 316 42 20.0 «
¦153736 75/03/07 0930 0003 32642 6.7 160.0 95 127
PAYEES CC-OP WASTEwAY <~V i 9.4)
43 56 02.0 116 42 40.0 4
#153689
75/08/05
1150
1350
0003
32308
8.3J
8.3
19.6
2.2
260
11 .2
1.9
75/08/06
1210
0003
32334
8 • 3 J
19.8
3.1
27S
13.0
2.0
120
75/0^/07
1155
0003
32360
8.3J
17.5
4.0
240
11.6
2.2
114
75/12/03
1325
0003
49534
2 . 0 J
8.8
313
17.8
1.6
75/12/04 12C0 2.0J
SEVEN"ILE SLOLiGM 1.3'tl N* LEThA
43 54 55.0 116 40 10.0 4
75/08/05
1130
140 5
0003
32307
156.OJ
156.3
19.9
3.6
95
9.0
75/08/06
1120
0003
32333
156.OJ
20.2
4.9
90
9.0
33
75/08/07
1135
0003
32359
156.OJ
16.3
2.5
es
9.2
37
75/12/03
1 145
000 3
49531
159.OJ
130
.
1 150
0003
49532
159.OJ
3.5
130
14.4
1155
0003
49533
159.OJ
130
75/12/04
1415
0003
159.0
O
SANG h0LLCV» 3 Ml *JW LETHA
43 55 SB.O 116 41 19.(1 4 *
<15373b 75/08/01 1040 0003 32641 9.6 16.0 18.0 1000 9.2 51
D-AIN N Bf.K PAYcTTF 3. [»M 21.0)
43 55 47.0 116 40 59.0 4
#153734 75/08/07 1108 0003
32640
0.8
17.5
48.0
230
8.4
HANI*A DRAIN (RM ?1. 3)
43 55 37.0 116 40 39.0 4
•153733 75/08/07 1140 0003 32639
75/12/02 1545 0003 49519
20.9
20. OJ
17.0
45.0
180
750
9.2
1.5
85
303
D&AIN S *EST rlANNA PD
-------
44v44«44fi44fl444444444{«4t44449C444&
• STATION NAME
1
LA8 1
I STREAM 1
WATER 1
TURfl
ICNDUCTVYICNQUCTVYI
DO 1
BOD 1
BOD i
i T ALK «
• LAT - LONG
1
IDENT. 1
1 FLOW 1
TEMP 1
JKSN
IFIElD 1
AT 25C 1
1
5 DAY 1
20 OAy 1
1 CACC 3 »
* STOPET *
DATE
ri"F depthi
NUMBER 1
1 CFS 1
CENT 1
jTU
IMlCSOMHOIMICrtOMHOI
MG/L 1
i mG/L 1
M&/L 1
1 MG/L *
TUNNEL NO.7 » VANDEPDASSON KOAD
43 53 07.0 116 37
17.0 4
#153685
75/08/05
1100
0003
32304
31.OJ
18.6
6.2
210
8.6
1625
31.0
75/06/06
1045
0003
32330
31.OJ
19.8
6.0
215
9.4
84
75/08/07
1130
0003
32356
31 .OJ
17.7
4.0
200
9.4
88
75/12/03
1055
0003
49527
10.OJ
9.4
320
75/12/04
1150
10.0
3ISSEL CR. 2.5 MI F
LETHA
43 S3 51.0 116 36
55.0 4
*153687
75/08/05
1045
0003
32306
4 . 4 J
18.1
60.0
320
8.4
1605
:4.4
75/08/06
1110
0003
32332
4 . 4 J
18.8
28.0
280
9.0
111
75/03/07
1105
0003
32358
4.4J
17.0
10.0
270
8.7
129
75/12/02
1525
0003
49518
3 • 2 J
1 1.7
800
11.7
0.1L
317
75/12/04
1130
.3.2
HAW CREEK 1 MI w EWVETT
43 52 47.0 116 32
07.0 4
*153664
75/08/05
091 0
0003
32303
18.3J
16.8
20.0
250
7.2
1.3
75/08/06
1030
0003
32329
18.?J
17.6
16.0
270
8.5
1.4
103
1130
18.3
75/08/07
0955
0003
32355
18.3J
16.2
13.0
260
7.8
1.1
104
75/12/02
1500
0003
49517
5.0J
13.1
700
7.0
2.5
264
75/12/04
1115
5.0
CITY OF EMMETT STP
'
43 52 45.0 116 30
30.0 2
#153756
75/06/05
1330
0001
32754
8 • 8 J
25.7
6.0
200
15.0
11.1
75/09/06
1615
0001
32759
8 • 8 J
27.1
5.5
240
16.7
75/06/05
1715
COMP
32700
8.8 J
8.1
85
75/06/06
1615
75/08/07
1025
0001
32764
8 . 8 J
24.5
7.0
230
9.3
1030
0001
32710
1000
COMP
32720
6 • 8 J
8.6
79
75/08/08
0630
75/12/03
1020
0003
49523
1.6J
255
1025
0003
49524
1.6J
4.1
261
13.4
13.5
1030
0003
49525
1 .6J
PAYETTE R C EmmETT
(HWY 52)
43 52 47.0 116 29
57.0 4
*153683
75/08/05
0B40
0003
32302
1420.OJ
18.7
1.8
70
8.6
0.9
75/0*3/06
1000
0003
32328
1460.OJ
18.9
2.2
70
8.8
1.3
2.1
25
75/0&/07
1010
0003
32354
1480.OJ
17.9
1.7
70
9.0
0.6
1.4
26
75/12/02
1420
0003
49514
2300.OJ
100
39
1425
0003
49515
2900.OJ
2.4
14.3
0.5
1.8
40
1430
0003
49516
2830.OJ
41
-------
• STATION M"E I L46 I STREAM I WATEk I TURB ICNOUCTVYiCNOUCTVYI DO I BCD I 300 I T UK »
® LAT - LONG I IDENT. I FLOW I TEMP I jKSN IFIELD I AT 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CACC3 •
« STOGET « DATE TIME DEPTH I NU«BE* I CFS I CENT I JTU I KlCHOMHO IMICROKhO I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L t MG/L •
PAYETTE R 100FT BLw PAYETTE STP
44 04 51.0 116 56 51.0 2
¦t*
ro
#153741 75/06/06 1200
0003
77012
22.0
170
8.4
1300
0003
77013
22.6
167
9.1
1400
0003
77014
23.2
164
9.6
1500
0003
77015
23.9
162
9.9
1600
0003
77016
24.7
162
10.0
1700
0003
77017
25.0
164
10.0
15C0
0003
77018
25.3
165
9.9
1900
0003
77019
25.0
166
9.4
2000
0003
77020
24.8
163
8.4
2100
0003
77021
24.4
160
7.4
2200
0003
77022
24.1
163
6.7
2300
0003
77023
23.6
168
6.3
2400
0003
77024
23.3
175
5.9
75/08/07 0100
0003
77025
22.7
176
5.7
0200
0003
77026
21.8
178
5.6
0300
0003
77027
21.4
177
5.5
0400
0003
77028
20.8
179
5.9
0500
0003
77029
20.1
176
6.1
0600
0003
77030
19.5
176
6.4
0700
0003
77031
19.0
170
6.3
0600
0003
77032
18.5
165
6;5
0900
0003
77033
18.6
167
6.8
1000
0003
77034
18.7
172
7.3
1100
0003
77035
19.1
180
8.1
FROZEN DOG DRAIN N9 EMMETT
43 53 22.0 116 27 09.0 4
•153682 75/08/04 1310
0003
32301
9 . 2 J
17.8
6.8
210
8.8
1.2
78
75/08/06 0515
0003
32327
9. 2J
16.0
17.0
170
5.4
1.1
74
75/0:1/07 0915
0003
32353
9.2 J
IS.7
9.0
140
5.7
1.2
3.0
78
75/12/02 1400
0003
49513
2.7J
10.9
300
12.1
1.7
105
75/12/04 1015
2.7
1025
0003
49559
2. 7J
payette bl plk can oam «b emmett
43 55 50.0 116 26 22.0 4
#153681 75/06/04 1215
0003
32300
1970.0
19.2
3.4
97
CO
•
CD
1.0
24
75/08/05
0003
1960.0
75/06/06 0940
0003
32326
2000.0
19.1
1.5
65
9.2
2.0
4.0
23
75/06/07 0930
0003
32352
2020.0
lb.2
1.4
65
8.3
0.7
1.6
24
75/12/02 1300
0003
49510
2300.0
95
38
1305
0003
49511
2300.0
2.2
14.0
O.S
2.0
41
1310
0003
49512
2300.0
40
75/12/03
0003
2900.0
75/12/04 1040
0003
49558
2830.0
-------
fr-0O4>»
STATION NA-E I LAB I STREAM 1 LAB IRESIDUE IRESILfUt IRESIOUE ISESIDUE HtSIOUE (RESIDUE I »
LAT - LCN<~, I IOENT. I FLO* I PH I TOTAL ITOT VOL IDISS-1 OS I TOT NFLTI VOL NFLTI 01SS-1SO I *
ST03ET s DATE TI("E DEPTH I NUMBER I CFS I SU I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/L I MG/L I -MG/L IC MG/LI »
CITY OF PAYETTE STP
44 05 01.0 116 57 05.0 2
#153752
CITY Or PAYETTE STP
*153752
75/08/04
1600
0001
32765
3.2J
75/08/05
0915
OOOl
32773
3.2J
75/08/04
1630
COP
32729
3.2
75/03/05
1450
1500
0001
32751
3.2J
75/08/06
0920
0001
32774
3.2J
1305
0001
32756
3.2J
75/08/05
1455
CCP
32704
3.2
75/05/06
1335
75/08/07
0840
OOOl
32775
3.2J
75/06/06
1340
COUP
32724
3.2
75/08/07
1300
1310
0001
32761
3.2J
1312
0001
32714
3.2 J
75/12/02
1300
0003
1.7J
1400
0001
2.2
1500
0001
2.4
1600
0001
2.1
1700
0001
2.6
1400
0001
2.0
1900
oool
2.0
2000
0001
1.9
2100
0001
1.8
2200
0001
1.8
2300
0001
1.8
2400
nool
1.5
75/12/03
0100
0001
1.4
0200
0001
1.3
0300
0001
1.1
0400
0001
1.0
0500
0001
1.0
0600
0001
1.0
0700
0001
1.0
.0 2
75/12/03
0800
OOOl
1 .5
osoo
0001
1.9
1000
0001
1.9
1100
0001
2.0
1200
OOOl
49801
1.7 J
1200
0003
1.7 J
75/12/02
1300
COfP
0003
49800
1.7
1.7 J
75/12/03
1200
547
194
84
64
520
181
85
63
-------
STATION NA*E I |_A6 I STREAM I LAB IRESIDuE IRESIDUt IRESIDUE IRESIDuE IRESIDuE IRESIDUE I
LAT - LONG I IuEnT. I Flow 1 Ph I TCTAl I TOT VOL 101SS-1051 TOT MFlTIVOL NrLTI 01SS-180 I
STORET « DATE TIME DEPTH! NUMBER I CFS I SU I HG/L I MG/L IC MG/L I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/L I
49 SLCOGH AT KI WAN I S PARK
44 04 05.0 116 56 07.0 1
75/08/04
1330
0001
26.0
75/08/05
1635
0003
3?324
26.OJ
284
30
7
75/06/06
1445
0003
32351
26.OJ
254
24
3
1500
0003
32452
26.OJ
75/08/07
1540
0003
3?377
26. OJ
113
9
4
1550
0003
32465
26.OJ
232
26
6
75/12/02
o
-------
* STATION NAHE i LAB 1 STREAM I LAB IRESIOUE IRESIDUt IRESIOUE IftESIOuE IHESIOUE IRESIDUE I •
« LAT - LCNG I IDENT. I FLOW I PH I TOTAL I TOT VOL IOISS-1051 TOT NFLTI VOL NFLT101SS-180 I •
• STORET * OATE TIME DEPTHI NU"BER I CFS I SU t *G/L I MG/L IC MG/L I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/LI •
FARCERS OITCHU INGt^O NR PAYETTE
44 01 47.0 116 55 19.0 1
*153702 75/08/04
1230
22.9
75/08/05
1555
0003
32321
23.OJ
118
34
6
75/08/06
1600
0003
32453
23.OJ
127
20
4
1610
0003
32348
23.OJ
124
19
8
75/08/07
1700
0003
32374
23.OJ
198
18
4
sand hollcx n» payette
44 01 31.0 116 53 58.0 1
*153701 75/06/04
1 50Q
49.5
75/08/05
1540
0003
32320
49.5J
172
46
6
75/08/06
1550
0003
32347
49.5J
206
29
5
75/08/07
1710
0003
32373
49.5J
174
24
4
75/12/04
0840
0003
49553
3.0
1415
3.0
OPAIN-2 M* E
FRU1TLAND
-------
-p*
«««««««««
• STATION N£>-'E
1
L£6 1
STREAM 1
LAB
1 RESIDUE
1 RESIDUE .t RES I DUE IRESIDuE
IR£SI*0UE ;RESIDUE 1
• LAT - LONG
1
I DENT. 1
FLCW 1
Prl
1 TOTAL
1 TOT VOL IDISS-105ITOT MrLT1 VOL N^LT|DISS-]SO 1
® STORET «
DATE TIME DEPTnI
NUMBER 1
CPS 1
su
1 MG/L
1 MG/L IC MG/L 1 MG/L
1 MG/L IC MG/L1
DRAIN S SIDE PAYETTE
R. (km 9.7)
44 00 39.0 116 50
10.0 <.
•153697
75/08/04
1445
0003
17.2J
1545
17.2
75/08/05
1445
0003
32316
17.OJ
336
57
8
75/08/06
1535
0003
32343
17.2J
462
148
14
75/08/07
1525
0003
32369
17.2J
380
84
14
75/12/04
0935
0003
49557
2.7 J
1350
2.7
DCA IN M SIDE PAYETTE
R (RM 9.3)
44 00 43.0 116 50
03.0 4
•153743
75/06/05
1625
0003
32618
100
65 4
3 80
drain s side payette
R (RM 9.9)
44 00 31.0 116 49
51.0 <*
#153696
75/08/04
1555
4.0
75/08/05
1440
0003
32315
4.0J
523
56
8
75/08/06
1525
0003
32342
4.0J
544
62
8
75/08/07
1520
0003
32368
4.0J
280
42
5
new Plymouth stp
f
43 59 00.0 116 47
00.0 2
#153755
75/08/05
1115
0001
32753
1.2J
1110
COMP
1.3J
442
110 154
31
75/08/06
1055
1115
0001
32758
1110
CO«P
32721
1.2 J
487
127 25
17
75/08/07
1105
1118
0001
32711
1.1J
1135
0001
32763
1.1J
75/12/03
1610
0003
0.2J
8.6
1615
0003
8.5
381
104 319 62
23
1620
0003
0.2J
8.6
CEMETERY DRAIN NR NEW PLYMOUTH
43 58 44.0 116 47
53.0 4
#153695
75/08/05
091 0
39.9
1420
0003
32314
39.9J
255
70
9
75/08/06
1500
0003
32341
39.9J
272
56
6
75/06/07
1450
0003
32367
39.9J .
150
48
5
1500
0003
40.OJ
150
48
5
75/12/03
1555
0003
49548
28.OJ
8.3
462
69 454 8
5
75/12/04
1330
28.0
PAYETTE fi. a WILLOW
CH. RD. bl"?.
43 59 26.0 116 47
42.0 4
#153694
75/08/05
1130
1297.0
1405
0003
32313
1297.OJ
115
22
4
75/08/06
1445
0003
32340
1297.OJ
120
12
2
75/08/07
1425
0003
32366
1297.OJ
130
9
3
75/12/03
1520
0003
49545
3580.OJ
7.2
1525
0003
49546
3580.OJ
7.2
90
21 78 12
7
1530
0003
49547
3580.OJ
7.2
75/12/04
1145
0003
3580.0
-------
• STATION NAI'F I Laa I STREAM I LAB IRESIDUE IRESIQUt IRESIDUE IRESIDUE IRtSIDUE IRESICjE I »
• LAT - LONG I IOENT. I FLOw I PH I TOTAL I TOT VOL i DISS-1051 TOT Nr LT1 VOL NFLT IDIS3-1301 •
• STO»ET » DATE TIME OEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I SU I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/L I MG/L I" MG/L IC K.G/L I »
DRAIN 5 BNK PAYETTF » (Bm 13.4)
43 56 51.0 116 47 10.0 4
<153740 75/08/05 1420 0003 32610 17.0 299 84 105 14 234
CAIN S PayETTF a CRM 13.4?)
43 58 b'j.O 115 47 08.0 4
"153739 75/0S/05 1415 0003 32609 3.0 270 111 12 5 241
PAYETTE R NR NEW PLYMOUTH HWY 52
43 58 09.0 116 46 30.0 4
75/06/05
1345
0003
32312
1315.OJ
122
16
4
75/08/06
1430
0003
32339
1315.OJ
116
14
2
75/08/0 7
1410
0003
32365
1315.OJ
154
9
0.5K
75/12/03
1500
0003
49542
3580.OJ
7.5
1505
0003
49543
3580.OJ
7.3
89
20 79 10
3
1510
0003
49544
3580.OJ
7.1
DRAIN S SUK PAYETTE R. (SM 15.3)
43 57 50.0 116 45 42.0 4
*153706 75/08/05 1?30 8.7
1330
0003
32325
8 . 7 J
220
32
6
i
75/08/06
1420
0003 '
32338
8.7J
218
12
4
-P»
75/0ci/07
1400
0003
32364
8 . 7 J
213
10
2
^1
75/12/03
1445
0003
49541
3.0J
8.3
363
60
359
4
1
75/12/04 1310 3.0J •
CAIN NP h AK IL T ON CORNEP RH15.7
43 57 3fc.O 116 45 23.0 4
#153692 75/08/05 1245 40.2
1315
0003
32311
40.OJ
327
44
6
75/08/06
1405
0003
32337
40.OJ
318
38
5
75/08/07
1340
0003
32363
40.OJ
187
54
7
1350
0003
40.OJ
187
57
7
75/12/03
1440
0003
49540
15.OJ
8.1
431
67
411
20
3
75/12/04 1300 15.0
8 LATERAL 1*1 E HAMILTON CtlRNcW
43 57 09.0 116 44 56.0 4
#153691
75/07/22
1635
0001
30728
75/08/05
1215
0003
32310
118.6J
232
27
5
1300
118.6
75/06/06
1245
0003
32336
118.6J
248
34
6
75/08/07
1240
0003
32362
118.6J
256
26
6
75/12/03
1425
0003
49538
38.OJ
8.1
282
51
256
26
8
1430
0003
49539
38.OJ
8.1
75/12/04
1440
0003
38.0
PAYETTE fi. = FALK BRIDGE
43 57 16.0 116 43 00.0 4
75/08/05
1200
0003
32309
1210.OJ
71
13
4
75/08/06
1225
0003
32335
1210.OJ
80
7
2
75/08/07
1210
0003
32361
1210.OJ
95
9
3
75/12/03
1340
0003
49535
3150.OJ
7.4
1345
0003
49536
3150.OJ
7.8
83
22 71 12
4
1350
0003
49537
3150.OJ
7.5
-------
* STATIC"; NAME
1
LiB I
stseaw i
LAS
IRESICXJE
1 HE SIOUfc.
l«ESIDUE
l«ES10U£
1 k£:5IOUE
Ifi-ESTDUc 1
* LIT - LCN&
1
IDENT. 1
FLOW 1
Prl
1 TOTAL
* TOT VCL
I0IS5-10S
1 TOT NFLTHOL .\FLT 1 DISS-1 30 1
~ ST0BE.T * DATE T
I«£ CEPTHI
NUV-3ES I
CFS 1
SU
1 l-G/L
< MG/L
IC HG/L
1 Mti/L
1 HG/L
IC HS/Ll
DRAIN £ S**K PAYETTE ICf 18.9)
43 56 3S.0 116 4? 20.0 4
4153736 75/08/07
0930
0003
32642
6.7
853
101
711
47
192
FiOcEPS CC-CP WASTEWAY (Rk 19.A)
43 56 02.0 116 42 *0.0 4
*153689 75/08/05
1150
0003
32308
8. 3 J
142
6
4
1350
6.3
75/08/06
1210
0003
32334
8 . 3 J
192
6
2
75/08/07
1155
0003
32360
H.3J
196
9
4
75/12/03
13?5
0003
49534
2 . 0 J
8.6
219
33
213
6
2
75/12/04
1200
2.0 J
SEVENMILE SLOUGH 1.3MI N'J LETH4
43 54 55.0 116 40 10.0 4
•1S3688 75/08/05
1130
0003
32307
156.OJ
49
10
3
1405
156.3
75/08/06
11?0
0003
32333
156.OJ
84
9
4
75/06/07
1135
0003
32359
156.OJ
61
7
3
75/12/03
1145
0003
49531
159.OJ
7.7
1150
0003
4*532
159.OJ
8.0
103
24
96
7
3
1155
000 3
49533
159.OJ
8.0
75/12/04
1415
0003
159.0
SAKO HOLLCW 3 MI NW LETha
43 55 S%.0 lie. *1 19.0 4
•153735 75/08/07
1040
0003
32641
9.6
143
42
74
B
63
C = AIN N 3M< PAYETTE B. (P* il.O)
43 55 47.0 116 40 5V.0 4
¦153734 75/08/07
1108
0003
32640
0.8
284
74
146
13
152
HAIvSA DRAIN t PM 21.3)
43 55 37.0 116 40 Ty.O 4
•153733 75/08/0 7
1140
0003
32639
20.9
329
61
237
20
116
75/12/02
1545
0003
49519
20.OJ
427
79
396
31
1
DCtJtj n. *CST HAtiNA ftn tfH 2^.4)
43 54 S5.0 116 39 42.0 4
•153732 75/00/07
1215
0003
32638
198
22
17
4
163
palette «. » letma bhidc>e
43 53 49.0 116 37 36.0 4
*153686 75/08/05
1020
0003
32305
1009.OJ
36
7
4
1530
1009.0
75/08/06
1125
0003
32331
1009.OJ
43
20
5
75/08/07
1115
0003
32357
1009.OJ
87
4
2
75/12/03
1110
0003
49528
2958.OJ
7.2
1115
0003
49529
2958.OJ
7.4
79
11
74
5
1
1120
0003
49530
2958.OJ
7.6
75/12/04
1320
0003
2958.0
-------
>*«««6*«6«o0«GCi3e&
STATION NAMf
LiT - LCMG
STODET » DATE
I LAb I STREAM I LAB
I IDElvT. I FLOW I PH
TIME DEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I SU
(RESIDUE IRESIDUE. IRESIOUE IRESIOUE IRtSIOUE IRESIDuE I
I TOTAL I TOT VOL IOISS-105 I TOT NFLTI VOL NFLTIOISS-1801
I MG/L I MG/L IC HG/L I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/L I
TUNNEL NO.7 a VANOfPOASSOM ROAO
43 53 07.0 116 37 17.0 4
*153685
75/08/05
1100
1625
0003
32304
31.OJ
31.0
121
21
3
75/08/06
1045
0003
32330
31.OJ
154
16
4
75/00/07
1130
0003
32356
31.OJ
168
16
3
75/12/03
105S
0003
49527
10.OJ
8.0
248
44
223
25
6
75/12/04
1150
10.0
B1SSEL Cfi. 2.5 HI E
LcThA
A3 53 51.0 116 36
55.0 4
#153687
75/08/05
1045
1605
0003
32306
4 .4 J
4.4
642
514
37
75/08/06
1110
0003
32332
4.4 J
302
149
2
75/08/07
1106
0003
32358
4.4 J
249
38
4
75/12/02
1525
0003
49518
3. 2 J
451
101
446
5
IK
75/12/04
1130
3.2
HAW C°££K 1 MI w EMMETT
43 52 47,0 116 32
07.0 4
•153684
75/06/05
0910
0003
32303
18.3J
220
94
10
75/08/06
1030
1110
0003
32329
18.3J
18.3
246
62
7
75/08/07
OS 55
0003
32355
13. 3 J
224
49
7
75/12/02
1500
0003
49517
5.0J
•
423
64
382
41
1
75/12/04
1115
5.0
CITY OF EWETT STP
43 52 45.0 life 30
30.0 2
#153756
75/08/05
75/08/06
75/08/05
1330
1615
1715
0001
0001
32754
32759
8.8J
8.8 J
CCMP
3?700
8.8J
119
45
16
12
7S/OH/06
161b
75/08/07
102S
0001
32764
8.8J
10 30
0001
32710
1000
COMP
32720
8.8J
180
44
20
19
75/06/03
0630
75/12/03
1020
0003
49523
1.6J
9.0
1025
0003
49524
1 .6 J
9.1
214
59
175
39
25
1030
0003
49525
1.6J
PAYETTE R C EMMETT
(HWY 52)
43 52 47.0 lib 29
57.0 4
•153683
75/38/05
0840
0003
32302
1420.OJ
18
6
2
75/08/06
1000
0003
32328
1460.OJ
50
5
3
75/08/07
1010
0003
32354
1480.OJ
51
3
1
75/12/02
1420
0003
49514
2300.OJ
1425
0003
49515
2900.OJ
SO
17
48
2
IK
1430
0003
49516
2830.QJ
V£>
-------
STATION NAME I L48 I STREAM I LA8 I RESIDUE ISESIOut IRESIDuE IRESIDuE IRESIDUE (RESIDUE I «
LAT - LONG I I9ENT. I FLOW I PM I TOTAL ITCT VOL 101SS-105! TOT NFLTIVOL r^FLT IDISS-130 I <
STO»ET « C4TE TIME DEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I SU I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/L t MG/L I MG/L IC MG/LI <
PAYETTE R 1O0FT 8LH PAYETTE STP
44 04 51.0 116 56 51.0 2
•153741 75/08/06
75/08/07
cn
O
1200
0003
77012
1 300
0003
77013
1400
0003
77014
1500
OOG3
77015
1600
0003
77016
1700
0003
77017
1800
0003
77018
1900
0003
77019
2000
0003
77020
2100
0003
77021
2200
0003
77022
2300
0003
77023
2400
0003
77024
0100
0003
77025
0200
0003
77026
0300
0003
77027
0400
0003
77028
0500
0003
77029
0600
0003
77030
0700
0003
77031
0P00
0003
77032
0900
0003
77033
100 0
0003
77034
1 100
0003
77035
FROZEN DCG DRAIN NR EWKETT
43 53 22.0 116 27 09.0 4
75/08/04
1310
0003
32301
9.2J
151
19
10
75/08/06
0915
0003
32327
9.2J
177
15
4
75/08/07
0915
0003
32353
9 .2 J
181
10
2
75/12/02
140 0
0003
49513
2.7J
229
56
222
7
1
75/12/04
1015
1025
0003
49559
2.7
2.7J
PAYETTE BL 6LK CAN DAM AB EKMETT
43 55 50.0 116 26 22.0 4
75/06/04
1215
0003
32300
1970.0
36
:o
4
75/08/05
0003
1 9ft0.0
75/OH/06
091.0
0003
32326
2000.0
74
6
5
75/0^/07
0930
0003
32352
2020.0
54
3
2
75/12/02
1300
0003
49510
2300.0
1305
0003
49511
2300.0
54
18
51 3
IK
1310
0003
49512
2300.0
35
7
4
4
75/12/03
0003
2900.0
75/12/04
1040
0003
49558
2830.0
-------
« STATION fJi"E I L'.d I STREAM I Nh3-N ITOT K JELI N02&.N03 I PhOS-TOT IPHOS-DISI PnOS-DI SI T OSG C ICHLSPi-iYL®
• LAT - LOr.r, I IOENT. I FLOW I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I ORTHO I C I A uG/L *
• STO°ET « OATE TIME DEPTH I NUMBER I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L t CORRECTS®
CITY OF PAYETTE STP
44 05 01.0 116 57 OS.O 2
*153752
75/08/04
1600
0001 -
32765
3.2 J
75/03/05
0415
0001
32773
3.2J
75/08/04
1630
CO"P
32729
3.2
75/08/05
1450
1500
0001
32751
3.2J
75/08/06
0920
0001
32774
3 . 2 J
1305
0001
32756
3.2 J
75/08/05
1455
CnvP
3^704
3.2
75/08/06
1335
75/06/07
0840
0001
32775
3.2J
75/08/06
1340
COMP
32724
3.2
75/0B/07
1300
1310
0001
32761
3.2J
1312
0001
32714
3.2 J
75/12/02
1300
0003
1.7J
1400
0001
2.2
1500
0001
2.4
1600
0001
2.1
1700
0001
2.6
1800
0001
2.0
1900
0001
2.0
2000
0001
1.9
2100
0001
1.8
2200
0001
1.8
?300
0001
1.8
2400
0001
l.S
75/12/03
0100
0001
1 .4
0200
0001
1.3
0300
0001
1.1
0400
0001
1.0
0500
0001
1.0
0600
oooi
1.0
0700
0001
1.0
.0 2
75/12/03
0800
oooi
1 .5
0900
0001
1.9
1000
0001
1.9
1100
0001
2.0
1200
0001
49801
1 .7 J
1200
0003
1 .7J
75/12/02
1300
COfP
49800
1.7
0003
1.7 J
75/12/03
1200
8.20
5.50
5.50
20.00
14.00
1.00
5.10 4.40 3.50 83.0
4.40 3.90 3.20 65.0
3.80 3.40 2.70 44.0
CITY CF PAYETTE STP
44 OS 01.0 116 57 05,
* 153752
15.00
21.00
0.36
3.35
3.35
-------
* STATION \A"' I L40 I STwEAM I NH 3—N I TOT KjELIh02f>N03 IPHOS-TOT I PhOS-D ISI PHOS.-OI SI T ORG C IChLRPMYL®
» LAT - LCN.G I ID£\T. I Fi_Cw I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I 03TH0 I C I A JG/L •
• ST OcET * -)ATE T1»E DEPTH I NUMBER I CF S I KG/L I KG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L ICO»?ECTD<>
4»»*«e»O0«««»4g»C«««4<<»0O«e««4«ftt«»««fi«eu«4ft«oO9fte41>4^««ft4fl«»«e««O«««44«««fi«fte»«44««»4«tft«A««««e»4Oft«»4 4««*»«t444»44«4»«4*«4«C»«»94 4
49 SLOUGH AT KIWANTS Pti>K
44 04 05.0 116 56 07.0 1
75/03/04
1 3~i0
000 1
26.0
75/08/05
1635
0003
32 324
26.OJ
0.03
0.50
0.25
0.22 8.0
75/0B/06
14*5
0003
32351
26.OJ
0.04
0.42
0.26
7.0
1500
0003
32452
26.OJ
75/06/07
1540
0003
32377
26.OJ
0.07
0.42
0.25
8.0
1550
0003
32465
26.OJ
0.03
0.43
0.25
8.0
75/12/02
0910
0003
49SOO
5.0J
0.26
1.10
l.SO
0.25
0.15
75/12/04
0630
0003
49552
5.0 J
PAYETTE & « PAYETTE (K IS-J AT: I S» PK)
44 03 35.0 116 56 04.0 1
•153704
on
ro
PAYETTE S H PAYETTE
44 02 33.0 116 55
•153703
75/OS/04
0003
32001
75/08/05
1625
0003
32323
1510.0
0.02
0.16
0.10
0.07
5.0
75/08/06
1515
0003
32350
1510.0
n.02
0.16
0.09
5.0
7.37
75/00/07
1605
0003
32376
1520.0
0.07
0.16
0.10
5.0
7.37
75/12/02
0920
0003
49501
2160.OJ
0.01
0.36
0.22
0.16
0.01
0925
0003
49502
2160.OJ
0 • 0 IK
0.49
0.20
0.15
0.02
25.79
0930
0003
49503
2160.OJ
0.01K
0.48
0.20
0.16
0.01
75/12/03
0003
3230.OJ
75/12/04
0003
3240.OJ
( H*Y 95 )
28.0 i
75/08/04
0003
32002
75/08/05
1610
0003
32322
1530.0
0.02
0.19
0.10
0.08
4.0
75/08/06
1530
0003
32349
1530.0 '
0.02
0.18
0.09
4.0
75/0fa/O7
1630
0003
32375
1540.0
0.04
0.17
0.10
6.0
75/12/02
1030
0003
4^504
2160.0
0 • 01K
0.46
0.22
0.15
0.02
10 35
0003
49505
3230.0
0.01K
0.44
0.22
0.14
0.01
1040
0003
49506
3240.0
0. 0 IK
0.58
0.21
0.16
0.01
CITY OF F»UITLANf) STP LAGOON «2
44 02 15.0 116 55 32.0 2
75/0h/05
1015
1000
0001
32752
COVP
32703
0.2J
0.42
5.50
3.10
1.50
2.20
75/08/06
0940
1000
0950
0001
32757
CO*1?
32723
0.2J
0.05
6.10
3.50
2.80
2.50
75/08/07
03S0
1005
1230
0001
0001
32713
32762
75/12/02
1100
0003
49507
0. 1J
6.50
12.00
0.33
6.85
6.50
1103
0003
49508
6.50
12.00
0.32
6.92
6.70
1106
0003
49509
0.1J
6.50
13.00
0.33
7.12
6.50
-------
»6o«*4i>a4<;o&»»6»eeeti4e«<>0e0a«ao*«»«*tto«o6i>4<#0tti»t>tfaatt44»4>a«««eooe4««o4oeaoO4oe<*mn s bnk payette
R. 9.6)
44 00 42.0 116 50
14.0 4
•153648
75/08/04
1540
8.1
75/08/05
1500
0003
32317
8.1J
0.05
1.10
0.23
0.20
7.0
75/08/06
1540
0003
32344
8.1J
0.09
1.20
0.29
7.0
75/08/07
1530
0003
32370
8.1 J
0.04
1.40
0.41
9.0
75/12/04
0925
0003
49556
0.5J
0.14
1.20
3.30
0.46
0.22
1355
0.5
-------
* STATION Nt'E I LSB I STSEAM 1 NH"i-N I TOT KjEl IN02&N03 IPH05-TQT IPnOS-OISI P<-CSi-OIS( T ORG C ICiLSFHrt.®
* L AT - LO:G ! TRENT. I FLO* I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL i I I C«THO I C la UG/L *
* STC&ET » OftTE TIM£ 3EPTHI NUMBER I CFS I ^G/L ( fG/L I M6/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I »G/L P i *G/L IC0«S£CT3»
D"tJN S SIDE PAYETTE ».
0003
3234]
39. 9J
D. 04
0.78
0.17
6.0
75/08/07
1450
0003
32367
39.9J
0.01
0.78
0.18
5.0
1500
0003
40.OJ
0.04
0.78
5.0
75/12/03
1555
0003
49548
28.OJ
0 • 0 IK
0.50
2.20
0.17
0.11
75/12/04
I33n
2h.O
PftYETTE <5. f. XILLOW CP. RO. tt«.
43 59 26.0 116 47 42.0 4
75/06/05
1130
12S7.0
1405
0003
32313
1297.OJ
75/08/06
1445
0003
32340
1597.OJ
75/08/07
1425
0003
32366
1297.OJ
75/12/03
1520
0003
49545
3580.OJ
1525
0003
49546
3580.0J
1530
0003
49547
35S0.0J
75/12/04
1145
0003
3580.0
0.0 IK
0.09
0.09
0.06
5.0
75.71
0.03-
0.09
0.07
5.0
12.06
0.01
0.09
0.10
6.0
0.01
0.22
o.ia
0.03
0.01
0.01K
0.22
0.14
0.04
0.01K
14.07
0.01K
0.22
0.13
0.03
O.OIK
-------
• STATION MAKE I L A8 I STWEAM I NH3-N I TOT KJELIN02&N03 IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-D IS IPHOS-DISIT OPG C ICHLKFHYL*
' LAT - LONG I IDENT. I FLOW I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I ORTHO I C I A UC-/L •
® STO^tT « DATE TI*E DEPTHI NUMBEH I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L ICORSECTC®
D=AI'J S BN< PAYETTE ^ (R" 13.4)
43 5a 51.0 116 47 10.0 4
* 15374 0 75/OS/05 1420 0003
32610
17.0
0.02
0.75
0.26
7.0
DPA1M S fe\K PAYETTF p (P« 13.42)
43 5% 50.0 116 47 08.0 4
•153739 75/08/05 1415 0003
32609
3.0
0.02
0.19
0.23
12.0
PAftTTE P NP NEW PLYMOUTH rt'.VY 52
43 5ft 09.0 116 46 30.0 4
#153693 7S/08/05
1345
0003
32312
1315.OJ
0.01
0.13
0.09
0.07
4.0
75/0H/06
1430
0003
32339
1315.OJ
0.02
0.13
0.08
4.0
75/08/07
1410
0003
32365
1315.OJ
0.01
0.13
0.09
5.0
75/12/03
1500
0003
49542
3580.OJ
0.01
0.20
0.17
0.04
0.01
1505
0003
49543
3580.0J
0.01
0.14
0.15
0.03
0.01
1510
0003
49544
3530.OJ
0.01
0.22
0.10
0.03
0.01K
OPAIN S <3K< d/syETTE 0. (P" 15.3)
43 57 50.0 116 45 42.0 4
*153706 75/06/05.
1230
6.7
1330
0003
32325
8. 7 J
0.03
0.40
0.22
0.18
7.0
75/06/06
14?0
0003
32330
8.7J
0.02
0.44
0.16
5.0
75/08/07
1400
0003
32364
8.7J
0.02
0.44
0.16
6.0
75/12/03
1445
0003
49541
3.0J
0.01K
0.32
0.92
0.10
0.08
75/12/04
1310
3.0J
•
DPAIH HP HAMILTON COPNEP PM15.7
43 57 36.0 116 45 23.0 4
•153692 75/0B/05
1245
40.2
1315
0003
32311
40.OJ
0.04
0.92
0.19
0.16
6.0
75/06/06
1405
0003
32337
40.OJ
0.03
0.93
0.19
5.0
7.37
75/08/07
1 340
1350
0003
0003
32363
40.OJ
40.OJ
0.03
0.05
0.91
0.91
0.19
6.0
6.0
75/12/03
1440
0003
49540
15.OJ
0.01
0.24
1.90
0.15
0.12
75/12/04
1300
15.0
S LATERAL 1*1 E HAMILTON CO^NE>»
43 57 09.0 116 44 56.0 4
•153691 75/07/22
1635
0001
30728
7S/0*/05
1215
1300
0003
32310
11«.6J
118.6
0.02
0.46
0.20
0.17
5.0
75/08/06
1245
0003
32336
116.6J
0.01
0.47
0.18
6.0
75/08/07
1240
0003
32362
118.6J
0.02
0.50
0.17
6.0
75/12/03
1425
0003
4953ft
38.OJ
0.01
0.18
0.85
0.19
0.12
1430
0003
49539
38.OJ
0.01
0.20
0.86
0.16
0.12
75/12/04
1440
0003
38.0
PtrETTE fi. B FALK RPIOGE
43 57 16.0 116 43 00.0 4
•153690 75/08/05
1200
0003
32309
1210.OJ
0.02
0.03
0.06
0.04
4.0
0.00
75/08/06
1225
0003
32335
1210.OJ
0.01
0.04
0.05
3.0
7.37
75/08/07
1210
0003
32361
1210.OJ
0.01
0.03
0.05
5.0
13.40
75/12/03
1340
0003
4953S
3150.OJ
0.02
0.20
0.11
0.03
0.01K
1345
0003
49536
3150.OJ
0.02
0.20
0.11
0.03
0.01K
0.00
1350
0003
49537
3150.OJ
0.02
0.28
0.14
0.04
0.01K
cn
cn
-------
• S T A TI f!N mt
1
LAB
STREAM 1
Nh3-N
TOT KJELIN02&N03
IPhOS-TOT
PrtOS-DlSIPHOS-DIStT
ORG C
ICrlLSPHvL
• LAT - LONG
1
I 9ENT. 1
FLOW 1
TOTAL
N
1N-TOTAL
OR T HO 1
C
1 A UO/L
» STOPET «
DATE TI-iF OEPTHI
NUMBER 1
CFS 1
MG/L
MG/L
1 MG/L
MG/L P
MG/L P
MG/L P 1
MG/L
ICOR
43 55 37.0 116 40
39.0 4
¦153733
75/0H/07
1140
0003
32639
20.9
0.02
0.48
0.31
7.0
75/12/02
1545
0003
49519
20.OJ
0.03
0.72
2.20
0 . 35
0.29
DRAIN 1* »FST riANNA
&D
-------
• STATION NAME I LArj I STREAM I NH3-N ITOT KJEL t N02&.N03 IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-DISIPHOS-DISIT ORG C ICHLRPHYL*
® LAT - LONG I IDFNT. I FLOW I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I ORTrfO t C I A UG/L »
* STODET * DATE TIME DEPTH I NUMBER I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L I CORRECTS*
TUNNEL NC.7 « VANDFPDASSCN POAO
43 53 07.0 116 37 17.0 4
75/08/05
1100
0003
32304
31. OJ
0.01K
o.oa
0.12
1625
31.0
7S/0o/06
1045
0003
32330
31 .OJ
0.02
0.07
0.11
75/08/07
1130
0003
32356
31.OJ
0.02
0.07
0.10
75/12/0.1
1055
0003
49527
10.OJ
0.11
0.48
0.53
0.14
75/12/04 1150 10.0
43 53 51.0 116 36 55.0 4
* 153637
7S/0*/05
1045
1605
0003
32306
4 .4 J
4.4
0.02
0.65
0.62
0.44
7S/0e/06
1110
0003
32332
4 .4 J
0.04
0.55
0.32
8.0
75/08/07
1105
0003
32358
4 • 4 J
0.04
0.64
0.25
7.0
75/12/02
1525
0003
49518
3.2J
0.01K
0.36
2.30
0.22
0.20
75/12/04 1130 3.2
HAW CPEFK 1 MI w EfMETT
43 52 47.0 116 3? 07.0
tn
*153664
75/06/05
0*10
0003
32303
18.3 J
0.02
0.09
0.23
0.17
9.0
75/08/06
1030
1130
0003
32329
1S.3J
18.3
0.03
0.08
0.21
7.0
75/08/07
0955
0003
32355
18.3J
0.03
0.08
0.17
6.0
75/12/02
1500
0003
49517
5.0J
0.01
0.60
0.33
0.22
0.06
75/12/04
1115
5.0
CITY OF EHMETT STP
0 2
75/08/05
1330
0001
32754
8 • 8 J
75/08/06
1615
0001
32759
8.8J
75/08/05
1715
CCVP
32700
->
CD
•
CD
0.20
2.60
0.56
0.36
12.0
75/06/06
1615
75/08/07
1025
1030
1000
0001
0001
32764
32710
8.8J
COP
32720
8.8J
0.22
2.70
0.64
o
r>
•
o
CD
St
•
©
17.0
75/08/08
0630
75/12/03
1020
0003
49523
1.6J
0.04
3.50
0.05
0.13
1.00
1025
0003
49524
1.6J
0.03
3.50
0.05
0.14
1.00
1030
0003
49525
1 «6J
3.10
0.05
0.14
PAYETTE = C EMMtTT
-------
STATION I L^ I STWt-.AM I NH3-N ITOT KJtLIN02iN03 IPHOS-TOT I PriOS-OI SI PnOS-DI 51T ORG C ICHLSPHYL®
LAT - LOST, I IDENT. I FLO* I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I ORTHO I C I A uG/L ®
STOCcT « DATE TIME DEPTHI NUmREA I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L IC033ECTD®
PAYETTE a 1COFT 3LW PAYETTE STP
44 04 51.0 116 56 51.0 2
"153741 75/06/06
ai
oo
i 120 0
0003
77012
1300
0003
77013
1400
0003
77014
1500
0003
77015
1600
0003
77016
1700
0003
77017
1800
0003
77018
1900
0003
77019
2000
0003
77020
2100
0003
77021
22 00
0003
7702?
2300
0003
77023
2400
0003
77024
' 0100
0003
77025
0200
0003
77026
0300
0003
77027
0400
0003
77028
0500
0003
77029
0600
0003
77030
0700
0003
77031
0800
0003
77032
0900
0003
77033
1000
0003
77034
1 100
0003
77035
F»OZE* OOG CAIN MP EmmETT
43 53 22.0 116 27 09.0 4
•153632 75/0M/04
1310
0003
32301
9.2J
0.01K
1.20
0.21
0.18
5.0
7^/08/06
0915
0003
32327
9.2J
0.03
0.81
0.33
7.0
75/08/07
0915
0003
32353
9.2J
0.04
0.96
0.25
5.0
75/12/02
1400
0003
49513
2 • 7 J
0.02
0.63
1.60
0.41
0.34
7b/12/04
1015
2.7
1025
0003
49559
2.7J
Payette «l rlk can dam ah emmett
43 55 50.0 116 26 22.0 4
•1536S1 7C/08/04
1215
0003
32300
1970.0
0.01K
0.01K
0.03
0.01
3.0
75/On/OS
0003
1480.0
75/08/06
0940
0003
32326
2000.0
0.02
0.01K
0.02
4.0
75/08/07
0930
0003
32352
2020.0
0.02
0.01K
0.02
3.0
75/12/02
1300
0003
4-vblO
2300.0
0.06
0.28
0.07
0.03
O.OIK
1305
0003
4V51 1
2300.0
0.06
0.22
0.07
0.02
0.01K
1310
0003
49512
2300.0
0.05
0.24
0.07
0.02
0.01K
75/12/03
0003
2900.0
75/12/04
1040
0003
49558
2830.0
3.35
-------
o STATION NA**E | |_AB ITOT COLIIFEC COLI IFECSTREP 10.P< DOTI ALOrtlN I BhC ICHLWOANEI 000 I ODE •
• L4T - LON'-i | IDENT. IMFIMEN00|MFM-FC«4I*F M-ENTIWHL SMPL I WHL SMPLIWHL SMPLI*HL SMPLI*HL SMPL I fc'HL SMPL»
» STO-ET « OATE TIME OEPTHI MUMHEft I /100ML | /10OML I /100*L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I U3/L I UG/L •
CJ1
to
city of Payette stp
44 05 01.0 116 S7
05.0 2
•153752
75/08/04
1600
0001
32765
75/08/05
0915
0001
32773
300
100«
75/01/04
1630
CO^P
3?72«i
75/08/05
1^50
1500
0001
32751
1000
100K
4100
75/0(4/06
0920
0001
32774
790
240
170
1305
0001
32756
100
100K
1000
75/08/05
1455
rrjHD
32704
75/08/06
1335
75/08/07
0840
0001
32775
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
73/08/06
1340
C0-4P
32724
75/08/07
1300
1310
0001
32761
1 OK
1 OK
1 OK
1312
0001
32714
0.001K.
0.001K
0.046 0.005K
O.OOlK
0.267K
75/12/0?
1300
0003
610
25
130
75/12/03
1200
onoi
49801
7r>/12/02
1300
C.O-P
49100
7-1/12/03
1200
49 SLOUGH AT
-------
* t.TlTTfj'.
1
L 6*1
ITGT COLJ1 EEC
CJLI
FECST^tPIO.P' DOT 1 4L0-L 1 #nL SMr>L 1 WHL SM = LI«nL S*fL 1 »
f-L SMPLlKn
L SM»l»
® STOwtT « JJATE T IME DE^TmI
NU^HErt
1 /100ML 1 /100ML
/100ML | UG/L 1 UG/L 1 UG/L 1 . UG/L 1
UG/L 1
UG/L *
city of kwuitland STP LA500n »?.
44 "2 15.0 116 55 32.0 2
#153753 75/08/05
1015
oooi
32752
1300
100
100K
1000
CO-'P
32703
75/08/06
0940
1000
oooi
32757
30
30
40
0*50
CO'-"3
32723
75/0e/07
0h50
1005
0001
32713
0.001K 0.001K 0.001K 0.005K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
1230
0001
32762
10
10
75/12/02
1100
01)03
49507
1103
0003
49506
10000
1700
520
1106
0003
49509
FA«*e-
o
BIG WILLOW C» 4 MI SE PAYETTE
4* 01 34.0 U« 50 27
"153745
0 4
75/08/06 1000 0003 32633
75/12/02 1610 0003 4*520
1615 0003 49521
1620 01103 40522
64 0
560
260
390
580
760
O.OOIK O.OOIK 0*008
0.001K O.OOIK 0.006
0.005K 0.001K 0.001K
0.005K 0.001K 0.001K
-------
S T A T J 0 M t.A*E
LAT - l.OM",
STMET *
LUTE
I LAB !TOT COLIIFEC COL I IFECSTWEf10,P' DOT I ALOhIN I 8HC ICHL^DAnEI OOP I DOE *
I I DENT • IMFIMENL>OlMFM-FCtl*IMF M-EfjT I UHL SMPL'i wrtL SMPLIWHL SMPLlwHL SMPLIJnL SMPLI»HL SM»L»
TIME DEHTHI NO'«HE« | /100HL I /100ML I /1.00ML I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L 1 UG/L I UG/L I UG/L *
dkaim s onk payette r. m-«
44 oo Si.a lift br> 43.n 4
»15":I699 75/0h/0S 1515 0"03 32318
7T/0e/0h 1550 0003 32345
7S/08/Q 7 1535 0003 32371
f>'r»AJM <5 3*« °AYFTT€ -i, S.6>
44 00 *2.0 116 51 14.0 4
#153696
75/0«/05 1500 0003
7S/OB/06 1^40 0003
75/0H/Q7 3 530 0003
7S/12/04 0925 0003
32317
32344
32370
49556
1500
330 4600
cr>
D»AIM S SIOE PAYETTE «. (-t- 9.7)
44 OO 39.0 116 50 10.n 4
•153697
7-./OH/05 1445 0003
75/01/06 1533 01103
7S/OS/07 1525 0003
75/12/04 0SI35 0003
32316
32343
32369
49557
OrfAIM N SlOf
PAYETTE * <¦}'* 9.H)
44 0 0 43.0
116 50 03.n 4
•15374a
75/0«/05
1625
0"03
32618
4000'
2300
6900
DSAI* S SIOE
PAYETTE ft (-1H 9.9)
44 00 31.0
116 49 51.0 4
•153696
75/0H/05
1440
0003
32315
75/08/06
1525
0003
32342
75/04/07
1520
0O03
3236(1
NEK PLYmOUT"
STP
*3 59 00.0
116 47 00.0 2
•153755
75/0(4/05
1115
0001
32753
200
100
100
7-V0H/06
1115
0001
32758
120
120
120
1110
CG-P
32721
7-f./08/07
1105
1118
0001
32711
0.001K
0.001K
0.009
0.005K
0.001K
0.006
1135
oooi
32763
210
150
290
7-/12/03
1615
0003
1 OK
10K
60
CEMETEHY OSfl IN NS NE«P PL**OUTrt
43 58 44..'!
116 47 53.0 »
•153695
75/0B/fl5
1420
0003
32314
7S/OS/06
1500
0003
32341
74/oa/OY
1450
0003
32367
75/12/03
1555
0003
4954B
220
98
160
PAYETTE R. *
-ILLOw C». ft). •**.
43 59 26,0
116 47 42.n <»
#153694
75/Q&/05
1405
QO03
32313
54 0
150
660
0.001K
0.001K
0.005
0.005K
0.001K
0.001K
75/03/06
14»5
UO03
32340
190
190
740
7S/OB/07
1425
0O03
3^366
71/12/03
1520
0"03
49a«s>
1525
0003
49546
70
48
120
0.001K
0.00 IK
0.004
O.OOSrC
o.ooik
0.001*
ls30
0033
49547
-------
STATION tMi"E I L49 (TOT COLllFEC COL I IF ECsT-iEP 10, P • DOTI ftLOSIN I BHC IOlHOANEi OOO I OOE •
LiT - LOimii I IDENT. I*F1meND0!«Fm-FCH*IhF M-EwT I WHL Sm^L I *HL SMPL I *HL SHPL)*HL SMPLI*hl SHPLIHrtt S^PL"
STUET • 0»TE TIME OE^Thl NlJMHt* I /100«IL I /100ML I /100»1L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L •
DRAIN S PA'fFTTE
-------
® STATION NAME
1
LAfl
ITOT COLllPt'C COLIIFECSTRtPIO.P' OUT 1 ALDKIN 1 6HC ICHLSOAnEI 000 1 DOE
• LiT - I.ONG
1
IOENT•
|MFIMENl>OIMFM-FC^IMF M-ENTIXHL SMPLIWnL SmPL 1WHL SMPLInfriL SMPLIWHL SMPLIaML SMPL'
* STO&ET # OATE time DEPTH 1
NUMBER
1 /100ML 1
/100ML 1
/10 OML 1 UG/L 1 UG/L 1 UG/L I- UG/L 1 UG/L 1 UG/L ¦
OOAIS E BNx- PArfTTTE 9. <-iM 18.9)
43 56 39.0 lift 42 20.0 4
*153736 75/08/07
0930
0003
32642
4400
3500
1000L
FAS«F«S CO-OP
-------
• STiTION M«f I L44 HOT CULIIFEC COL I I FECST^SP 10. P • DOT I 4|_0-Ul«lrtt. SM^LIWhL SM»L I «HL SMPLI*r-L Ss^LlkHL S*0L»
• STO»ET « 04TE TI*E DEHThl NUi-Mt* I /100ML I /IGOML I /100 ML I uG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L •
cn
•P*
BISSEL cs. 2.5 MI E
LETha
<~3 53 51.n 116 36
55. 0 4
•153687
75/08/05
1 045
0003
32306
7->/oe/ob
1110
0(103
32332
75/08/07
1105
0003
32358
75/12/02
1525
0003
*9518
68
36
390
HAW C«EEK 1 Ml w E«m€TT
43 52 47.n 11* 32
07.0 «
•153684
75/08/05
0910
0003
32303
9400
5300
5200
7%/nrt/Of.
1030
0003
3?32
32720
75/08/08
0630
75/12/03
1020
0003
49523
60
1 Ok
40
1025
0O03
49524
•
1030
0003
49525
PAYETTE * C EmmETT
(rttoY 5?)
43 52 47.0 116 29
57.0 *
•153663
75/08/05
0n40
0003
32302
ISO
22
100
75/08/06
1000
0003
32328
60
22
70
75/08/07
1010
0003
32354
190
22
7
75/12/02
1420
0003
49514
1425
0003
¦495 15
110
1 OK
18
1430
0003
49516
PsYETTE P 100FT ftL«
PAYETTE STP
44 04 51.0 116 56
51.0 2
•153741
75/08/06
1200
0003
77012
1300
0103
77013
1400
0O03
77014
1500
0003
77015
lbOO
0O03
77016
17 00
0003
77017
1 800
0003
77018
1900
0003
77019
20 0 0
0003
77020
2100
0003
77021
2200
0003
77022
2300
0003
77023
2400
0003
77024
75/08/07
0100
0003
77025
0.001K 0.001K 0.010
O.OObK
o.ooik o.ooik
O.OOIK O.OOIK
O.OOIK O.OOIK
O.OOIK O.OOSK
O.OOIK O.OOIK
0.006
O.OOSK O.OOIK O.OOIK
-------
0/>00 0003
0300 0013
0»00 0003
osoo ono3
0*00 0003
0700 0003
0600 0003
0900 0003
1000 0003
MOO 0003
7702b
77027
7 70?H
77029
77030
77031
77032
77033
77034
7703b
-------
iTanos N4"-£ ! LAH (TUT C'JlIIFlC COL I I FECSTrtEP | 0, P • OQTI 4LOKIN i BHC I CHfc.HOANEI ODD I DCE
LAT - I Our, ( ICtMT. tcsFIfENUOlMFH-FCiaiMF H-EmTIWHL SMPLI»riL SMPLthML SmPL I «rlL SmPL I S^PL I «"-iL SHPL
STOk£T , Oiie time OEPTnl NuXHF.S I /IOOMl I /100ML I /100ML I IJS/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I Ui>/l I UG/L
FROZE'" DOG 0»AIN NP E"METT
43 53 22.0 11* ?7 09.0 4
•1536S2 75/1*/04 1310 0003 32301 1000 66 2100
7S/0 *i/ 06 0915 0003 32327 3800 loO
-------
• ST0«r1
ST £ T I ON
i_iT — L 0^- j
04T6
>4 A
I DOT I OltLtl-ilN I TOX^HENE I HCML.W I HCHLH-tP I 4K0CLUW t LI NOANt I
UHL S*PLI"HL SM^LIWnL SmPL I *«L SMPL I VML SI-PL I 12o0 I WHL SMPLI
TI^E OEwTH| UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I
CITv IF Ptr-TTf 5TJ
4* OS 01.0 lift V/ 0-..0 2
*153752 7-1/08/07 1312 0001' 0.460K 0.07MK 0.060K O.OOIK O.OOIK 0.015K 0.001K
4i «LOijri t- T 05 0003
7-5/12/02 0SI25 0003
0.O03K O.OOIK 0.060K
0.003K O.OOIK 0.060K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.OlSK
0.015K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
payette << x PirrTTF c i«r 45 )
44 02 33.0 u*. 55 2-i.O 1
•151703 71/12/1^
1035
0003
0.003K
O.OOIK
G.060K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.U15K
O.OOIK
CITY Of FPUITLAnD STP LA'SJON «?
44 0? l<;.n 11*. 5-i 32.0 2
* 153 7C.3 75/0«/O7
1005
0001
0.003K
O.OOIK
0.060K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.015K
0.00 IK
F0IT<>- nx PAYtTTE
44 01 47.0 lift 55 1<<.0 1
•153702 75/0ft/05
1555
0003
0.174
O.OOIK
O.ObOK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.015K
O.OOIK
c.eMj hollow n« pavette
<>4 01 31.0 116 5J 5H.0 l
•JS37P1 75/0n/O5 1540 0003
75/12/04 0M40 0003
0.034 O.OOIK 0.060K
0 • 003K O.OOIK O.OiOK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.015K
0.015K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
¦116 WILLOW fH 4 MI SE PefETTe
44 01 34.0 lift Sn 27.(1 4
*153745 7-i/iM/Oh 1000 0 0 0 3
7i/12/0«; 1M5 0003
O.OOIK O.OOIK O.OhOK
0.003K O.OOIK O.OISOK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOlK
O.OOIK
0•01SK
O.UlSK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
WFW P| YcOoT- . -in,
43 59 26.0 116 47 42.0 4
• ISSfc'K. 76/Oh/05 1»0S 0003
7-J/12/0.J l*i25 0»03
0.003K O.OOIK O.OoOK
0.003K O.OUlK O.OoOK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.015K
0.015K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
OhiJ-I 5 M»J-< PaYFTTE « (*M 13.4?)
43 5« 50.0 11A 47 OH.O 4
•15373* 75/03/05 1415 0003
0.003 0.001 0.060
0.001
0.001
0.015
0.001
3 LATf^lL 1"! S HAMILTON CO-iNEK
43 57 04.0 11A 44 56.0 4
• 153fi<»l 75/08/05 1215 0003
75/12/03 1425 0003
0.003K O.OOIK 0•060K
0.003K O.OOIK O.ObOK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
o.oisk
0.015K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
-------
ST AT ICN N
Lit - l.O«i i
sTo^er
;)aTE
I HOT IDIfcin^lM I TOK^HENr; | HChL^ I HCML^-E^I ftrtQCLUK ILINOANt I
l«HL SMPLI.HL SMf l I «nL SMPLUHL I*ML SM^LI 1260 I tfrlL S^L I
TIm£ OEPTnl UG/L i U'j/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I uG/L I UG/L I
PAYETTE ». «
~7 16.0
B1S36S0
Fil_K 4*103?.
lift 4? 00.1 4
7*->/08/0b IkdO 01(13
7-./12/03 13^5 0003
II .00 IK
0.003K
O.OOIK 0 • Oft OK O.OOIK 0.001K O.OlbK O.OOIK
O.OOIK O.ObOK O.OOIK 0 • 00 IK 0.01SK 0.001K
FARMERS CO-OP «£STE-»AY (rj« 1^.4)
43 36 1?.0 lift 42 40.0 4
»1536^ 7S/12/03 1325 0003
0.003K
O.OOK G • 060K 0.001K O.OOIK 0.015K 0.001K
payftte ^. « leth^
43 S3 4 • 0 lift .4 7 3ft. '• 4
»1536*b 7-;//l
-------
• STATION NA*E I LAP I STREAM I YATt* I TU«0 ICNOUCTVYICNDUCTVYI DO I 600 I BOO I T AL*. *
» L A T - LONG I IUENT. I FLO* I TEM? I JKSN IFI ELL) I AT 25C I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CAC03 »
• STO*FT » OATE TI"E DE»Th| NU*i8E« I CFS I CENT I JTU I MI CHOmhO I mIC^OMhO I MG/L I Hii/L I MG/L I "G/L *
MONROE C& AT ^!OGt
44 14 42.0 11^ 57 27.0 1
7S/0
V£>
75/08/04
1520
0003
•32407
109.OJ
27.5
30.0
290
9.0
75/08/05
1100
0003
324 34
109.OJ
27.0
300
8.2
1.3 115
75/08/06
1U40
0003
32419
109.OJ
22.5
32.0
320
8. 1
124
75/08/07
1040
0003
32430
109.OJ
1<*.0
35.0
300
B.9
O.IK
1 730
108.6
1940
0003
77000
109.OJ
25.6
232
6.4
2030
0003
77001
109.OJ
25.0
6.1
2130
00 03
77002
109.OJ
24.3
223
6.1
2230
0003
77003
109.0J
23.6
21o
6.3
2330
0003
77004
109.OJ
23.1
214
6.4
75/08/08
0030
0003
77005
109.OJ
22.4
218
6.4
0130
G 0 U 3
77006
109.OJ
22.0
228
b • b
023 0
0 0 03
77007
109.OJ
21.3
238
t>.7
0330
0003
77008
109.OJ
20.8
240
6.7
0430
0003
77009
109.OJ
20.3
248
6.6
0S30
0003
77010
109.OJ
20.0
248
o , 6
nn3o
0003
77011
109.OJ
19.5
246
6.6
75/12/02
1040
0001
49b53
951.OJ
0.5
92
1 U45
oooi
49654
951.OJ
220
14.1
91
1045
0003
951.OJ
1050
0001
49655
951.OJ
91
75/12/04
OvOO
0003
951.0
LC»£« PAYETTE DITCH N» *£ISE«
44 fi4 03.0 116 56 17.0 1
#15371=
75/08/04 1540 0003
75/08/06 1055 0003
75/08/07 1110 0003
1700
32420
13. 8J
13. 8J
13.«J
13. 8
23.0
12.0
16. 0
12.0
200
480
180
8.9
9.1
10.0
0.9
2.1
2.6
2.9
68
70
-------
* STATION NJMF | Lift I STREAM i ^ATcrt I TlMrt ICNDUCXVYICNDUCTVYI DO I BOD I BOD i T AL* *
» LfiT - LO.Nf, | IOtNT. I FLO* I TEMP I J."}-
0 11#. 52 00.0 1
• 8)
*153713 75/06/05
1005
0003 '
32406
13.OJ
11.0
600
8.5
1.5
244
75/0i.l)
44 15 05.0 11*. 4ft 32.0 1
•153712 75/08/05
0950
0003
32405
86.0 J
33.0
210
7.9
0.9
80
75/08/06
1120
0003
32417
66. OJ
22.2
41.0
220
10.0
85
75/08/07
1135
0003
32428
H6.0J
19.0
48.0
170
8.9
2.0
1MO
86.0
7t>/12/02
1200
0001
49657
990.OJ
75
1205
0001
4965B
990.OJ
0.2
180
12.9
75
1205
0003
990.OJ
2.9
1210
0001
49659
990.0J
76
SEISES R aT USG5 2660 (rfi 15.11
44 16 02.0 llfi *6 01.0 1
*153711 75/OW/05
0915
0003
32*04
271 .0
40.0
150
s.o
1.0
60
75 /1H/r,b
0920
0003
3
-------
• STATION NitfF
1
LAH 1
STrtEAM I
•JATE^i 1
TU«9
1 CimOuCTVY I CNDUCTVY 1
00
i *on i
sen i
T JL* '
* LiT - LONG
i
IOEnT. 1
FLO* I
TEMP 1
JKSN
(FIELD . 1 AT 25C 1
1 5-DSY I
20 OAY 1
CAC03 <
* smaeT < qlte time depth
NIHAE3 1
CFS 1
CENT 1
JTU
11ICWQMHQIMIC^OMHO1
MG/L
1 MG/L 1
M6/L 1
HG/L '
«***#*»*<
KEIT1LY Cf NR *IDVALE 1WY 9S
44. 29 35.0 116 43 05.0 1
<153708 75/08/05
1230
0003
32401
l.OJ
9.7
255
9.5
1.6
107
75/03/06
1330
0003
32412
l.OJ
24.1
5.7
265
a.a
124
75/06/07
1300
1.0
HOD
0003
32424
l.OJ
22.5
3.7
2ti 0
8.9
127
75/12/03
0445
onni
4967 3
1 . OJ
0.1
220
12.8
0*45
0003
l.OJ
WEISEft R. 4B MIOVAUE 41.7!
4* 30 40.0 116 40 41.0 1
•153707 75/06/05
1215
0003
32400
55, 0 J
1.6
140
9.6
1.2
58
75/0(3/06
1310
0 0 03
32411
55 . 0 J
24.7
4.0
131
10.0
62
75/08/07
1350
0003
32423
'55.OJ
24.0
58
75/12/03
1000
0001
49674
920,OJ
100
1005
0001
49675
920.OJ
0.1
12.5
1005
0003
920.OJ
1010
0001
49676
920.OJ
WEISE* R. NS CAKBWIOGE {rtM 44.9)
44 33 07.0 116 41 45.0 1
*153729 75/08/04
1500
0003
32500
124,OJ
25.5
1.6
140
8.5
57
75/08/06
1530
0003
32523
124;o J
1.2
61
1535
0003
124,OJ
75/08/07
1130
124.2
1535
0003
32535
124,OJ
25.0
1.6
63
9.2
1.0
65
75/12/03
1030
0001
49667
917.OJ
1035
0001
49678
917.0J
12.8
1035
0003
917,OJ
0.5
1040
0001
49679
917,OJ
110
1330
0003
917,0
LITTLE REISER NR CAM^IOGE
44 3? 47.0 116 39 13.0 1
•153727 75/06/04
1600
0003
32502
10,OJ
4.8
220
7.5
79
75/08/06
1500
0003
32521
10.OJ
27.5
4.2
190
9.0
1.0
86
75/08/07
1030
10.2
l'-OO
0003
32533
10.0 J
27.0
4.2
200
9.1
1.3
2.7
86
75/12/03
1110
0003
337.0
1130
0001
49682
337.OJ
0.1
1135
0001
49683
337. r. J
12.8
1135
0003
337.0J
1140
0001
4968*
337.OJ
105
PINE C» N* CAMBRIDGE *>
-------
ro
• STtTIGN Ns-r
1
L«B 1
STPP.am |
«ATEf 1
TlWri
1 CnOUCTYY 1 CnD
-------
» STaTIOM I LAB I STkEAM I WATEk I TU«B ICNDUCTVYICNDUCTVYI DO I BOO I BCD I T ILK ®
• LAT - LONG I IOFNT. I FLO* I TEMP I JKSN IFIELO 1 AT 2SC I I 5 DAY I 20 DAY I CAC03 »
» STO^ET « DATE TIME DEPThI NUMBER I CFS I CENT I JTU t MICKOMHOIMICHOMHOI MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I HG/L *
CITY CF COUNCIL STP
44 44 50.0 116 27
40.0 2
#153749
75/08/05
1345
0001
32767
21.2
255
0.3
1200
coif
32707
0.5 J
126.0 105
7-3/08/06
1200
1245
0001
32769
0.5J
21.4
25 0
0.8
1 jOO
0001
32717
75/08/07
1200
0001
32772
20.1
250
4.0
75/08/0b
1200
C04P
32727
0.5 J
17.5
105
75/08/07
1200
75/12/03
1415
0001
49694
120
(-*
O
•
O
1415
0003
0.2
1.5
HORNET CREEK AT COUNCIL
4> 44 43.fi 11#. 31
m.n l
•153723
T5/18/05
1220
0003
32507
2.0J
22.5
1.7
170
8.0
63
75/08/06
1245
0003
32517
2.0J
22.2
2.5
152 .
8.5
67
1515
2 . 0 J
75/0«/07
1 300
0003
32529
2.0J
19.7
1.7
120
B.O
59
75/12/0?
1330
0003
70. lt
75/12/03
1400
ooni
49693
70. O'J
2.5
1*0
1400
0003
70. OJ
WEISF* R AT COUNCIL
(«M 68.«>
44 43 So.o 11#. 2ft
51. 0 1
•153722
75/08/05
1240
0003
32508
41 .O.'J
21.8
4.0
ISO
8.6
55
75/08/06
1230
0003
3251(3
41.0.J
21.4
2.6
135
9.0
56
1530
41.4
I5/08/07
12*5
0003
32528
41 .OJ
19.4
1.0
150
9.4
50
75/12/02
1410
0003
250.0
75/12/03
1345
0001
49692
250.OJ
2.0
12.7
1345
0003
250.OJ
1.9
W FORK nEISctt R AT COUNTY *0
44 49 10.0 11#. 27
35.0 1
•153721
75/0
44 49 02.0 116 2ft
58.0 1
"153720
7-3/08*05
1150
0003
32506
7.0.1
14.4
0.7
220
7.6
0.7
65
75/08/Oh
1145
0003
32514
7 • 0 J
19.8
1.2
190
8.8
0.8
70
1430
r>
75/08/07
11^0
0003
32526
7 • 0 J
18.0
2.2
83
8.2
0.3
65
75/12/02
lcrOO
0003
9M.2
75/12/03
1440
0001
49695
2.3
135
12.5
1440
0003
9*.0J
1.1
-------
* 5T AT I0\ NA*F
1
la*
STwf- A'i I
WATFH i
Tu*8
1 CNOLiCTVY | CMJUCTVY |
DO
BOi) 1
&or>
T AlK
* LfcT - |.On>j
1
Ii>£NT.
Flo- i
Tfc*^ 1
JKbN
1FIELu I AT 25C i
5 Day
20 DAY
CAC03
* ST03ET «
0&TE. Tl^e Dt^Tni
nIHREk
CFS 1
CENT 1
jTu
1 MJCKGMhO 1 MIC-i / 0 6 111S
0 0 03
32*13
ft.fi J
1H.4
1.8
13(1
7.o
63
7">/0^/07 1120
0003
3?^2b
7.8
17.2
2.0
110
7.6
62
7T/12/0?
0(103
22,0
7*3/12/03 162^
0001
49697
16.0
0.6
130
10.0
1^25
oonj
1 * • 0
1.6
7-i/12/
on ah
lfc.rt
* E IS £ ^ P E ta*>4-aC<
^*5.6
44 5 fc 0 0.fi 11* 2.i
OS.O I
#153718
75/08/OS 1020
0003
32503
10. OJ
1.7
140
8.3
2.2
63
7^/08/06 1050
0003
32512
10. 0 J
l.«
ISO
9.1
0.9
6?
75/09/07 1040
0003
32524
10.UJ
2.6
15S
8.7
0.7
60
-------
• ST/.TIOw r.jKt I LIVH I STKfAM I LAB
• L*T - lUMfi I IOENT. I FLOW I PH
• STOmET ¦ OATE TI~E DE^Trtl NUMBER I CFS I SU
>o»d<*fro/0*/07
1200
0003
32433
115.OJ
278
38
10
71/12/02
0930
0001
496b0
970.OJ
0945
0O01
41551
970.OJ
137
32
5
1 126
0945
0003
970.OJ
166
29
158
a
1
WE ISFR P »g wflsEh (rtM 1.9)
44 14 30.0 11* 56 35.1 1
• 153714 75/08/04
1520
0»03
32407
109.OJ
8.1
202
38
12 194
75/0rt/05
1100
00 03
32434
109.OJ
7.6
269
22
4
75/08/06
1040
0003
32419
109.OJ
257
28
6
75/08/07
lOtO
0003
32430
109.OJ
17 <0
108.6
1V4 0
0003
77000
109.OJ
20 30
0003
77001
109.OJ
2130
0003
77002
109.OJ
2230
0003
77003
109.OJ
2330
0O03
77004
109.OJ
75/08/08
00 }0
00 03
77005
109.0J
(11 30
0 0 0 3
7700ft
109.0J
02 3 0
CIU03
77007
109.OJ
0330
0 0 0 3
77008
109.OJ
04 30
0 0 0 3
77009
109.0J
05 30
0003
7 7010
109.OJ
0r>30
0003
77011
109.OJ
75/12/02
1040
0001
49653
951.OJ
1045
0(101
4*654
951.OJ
1045
0003
951.0J
17ft
38
146
30
2
lu50
0 001
49655
951.OJ
75/12/04
0900
0003
951.0
LO*E» PsYETTE OlTC-i UK «clSE«
44 0» 03.0 lift 5ft 17.0 1
#153715 75/08/04
1540
0003
13.8J
7.4
110
28
8 96
75/08/06
1055
0003
32420
13.8J
139
27
7i/0«/07
1110
0003
13. 6J
174
VI
CJ1
1700
13. 8
-------
STaTJCm i LAS I SThlam I Lftri ItfESJfl'JE I RESIDUE l*t5ID!JE IHtSIOUE MESIDUE I^ESI^UE I
LAT - lCnO ! IDEST. I FLO* I P* I TOTAL I TOT VOL 101SS-1 Ob I TOT NFLTlSfCL nFLT I r-IS&-1 <*G I
STO^FT * i)AJE Tlr^E jE^Thj nu*HLK | CfS I SU I wG/L I WG/L IC MG/L I *3/L I *G/L "G/L I
MAN* CR. &8 *£! *.6-.S)
44 1* 31.?) llfc S3 00.0 1
•1S3713 75/OH/05
1005
0103
3240*
13.0 J
7.8
374
26
6
75/na/o*.
1 LI 00
01103
32416
13.0 J
340
38
d
10 20
0 U 03
32450
13. OJ
26H
32
6
75/0B/07
1015
0003
32429
13.OJ
376
29
10
lt.30
13. i
75/12/02
1135
0001
49656
5.0J
LI 35
0003
S. 0 J
3ea
90
360
8
1
WEIS?^ P a3 rfEISEt- (S-t »..n
44 IS 05.0 IIS 46 32.0 1
#153712 75/15/05
0V50
0003
3 24 05
66.OJ
7.3
20f>
22
5
75/0(1/06
1120
0003
32417
66. 0 J
195
24
5
75/0 6/07
1135
Of>03
3Z42U
Hh.OJ
1610
tto . 0
75/12/02
12U0
0001
44657
990.OJ
12 05
0001
<•4658
990.0J
1205
0 0 03
9**0 .0 J
4V5
h2 '
91
404
26
1210
OOOl
49659
990. 0 J
WEISES C 4T USRS <»4 15.1)
44 is o?.g n* 4S ni.o 1
•153711 75/0*/')b
0915
0003
32404
271.0
7.2
194
39
«
75/06/06
0920
0003
32416
279.0
176
30
7
75/0^/07
0945
0O03
3?4?7
32V.0
202
56
13
75/12/02
1250
OOOl
49660
625.0
1255
0101
49661
H25.0
1255
0003
H25.0
309
42
102
207
17
1300
0O01
49662
*25. 0
75/u/m
0003
1230.0
75/12/04
0003
919.0
C&ANf CP. 15 "1 AH tffise-*
44 17 26.(1 116 46 45.0 1
¦153710 75/08/05
ostoo
0003
32403
19b.OJ
6.8
249
13
7
75/<)H/n*
091 0
0 (10 3
3?415
195. (l J
23b
93
61
75/0H/07
Oy.30
0 0 0 3
324?ft
l«5.f>J
232
• 6
7
1430
195.0
75/12/02
1350
OOOl
49663
19.OJ
1355
OOOl
49664
19.OJ
1 355
0 0 03
1^. 0 J
202
50
1B6
16
2
75/12/03
IbOO
0O03
18.3
WEIS^S P tT MIOVALC Irf* 36.4)
44 2H 1?.(1 llfc «3 37.n 1
• 1.53709 75/06/05
124b
0003
3240?
72.OJ
7.1
122
6
1
75/0«/06
1340
0003
32413
72. OJ
1 16
a
3
75/08/07
1315
72.2
1410
0003
32425
72. OJ
10ft
6
2
75/12/03
0645
OOOl
49670
920.OJ
0550
oooi
49671
920.OJ
0650
0003
920.OJ
las
4b
110
78
15
0
-------
• STATION »/4K5 I L4H I STKtAM I LArt IWtSIOUt ItfESIO'JE IMESIOUt IRfcSIDJE I RESIDUE I RESIDUE I
» L'T - [ 0»"i I int'NT. I FLO" I Pn I TOTAL I TOT VOL IDISS-105I TOT Nt-LTIVOL SiFLT I OI SS-1 «0 I
• STOSFT • n«TE TI^E OE^T HI MUMHEW I CFS I SU I MG/L I *G/L IC MG/L I MG/L I MG/L IC KG/LI
Kfc'JTHLY CP *JR MJDViLE HwY 95
44 29 35.0 lis 43 05.fl 1
#153706
75/06/05 1230 0(103 32401 1.0J
75/06/06 1330 0003 32412 1.0J
75/03/07 1300 1.0
1*00 0003 3242* 1.0J
7=5/12/03 09*5 OOOl 49673 1.0J
i>v45 0003 1.0J
7.6
210
227
210
170
36
147
33
18
16
23
YEISErf K. A*BBIOGE h«Y *JS
44 33 45.0 116 41 01.0 1
75/Oa/04
1530
0003
32501
10.0 J
7.8
123
67
21
6
82
75/06/06
1515
0003
32522
10.OJ
114
66
2
2
96
75/06/07
1100
10.4
1525
0003
32534
10.OJ
116
6rt
3
2
102
75/12/03
1045
OOOl
49660
13-OJ
1045
0003
13.OJ
112
22
95
17
4
1200
OOOl
13.0
-------
STiTTO'J mf.SIOUE I *
LAT - LONG I IQENT. I FLOW I Prt I TOTAL ITOT VOL IDISS-IOdITOT \FLTIVOL NFLT101SS-1bOI •
STO^ET • DATE TImE DE^TM NUM8ER I CFS I SU I "G/L I MG/L IC mG/L I MG/L I mG/L IC «G/L I *
CITY OF CitKRlOGE iTP
#153785
5 ?
75/06/05
1030
U001
32766
75/0S/0o
1015
0001
32716
10 30
0001
3276ft
75/0*3/05
1G 30
CO«a
75/08/06
1030
75/0H/1S
1202
Ci>*P
327 OS
75/08/06
1202
1600
0001
32770
75/03/0/
0*45
onoi
32771
75/oa/n*
0945
co-tp
32728
75/04/07
0945
75/12/03
1105
0101
49681
1105
0003
0.03J
0.1
O.lJ
O.lJ
0.1
279
312
285
119
90
244
14 12
23 11
41 29
00
WE1SE* f"1 U«,r,<; r,tC,E
44 34 50.0 lift 38
•153726
?S85 i"( 51.3
50.0 1
75/08/05
1650
0003
32511
104.0
75/08/06
1445
0O0J
32520
99. 0
75/oa/07
1 450
0003
32532
96.0
60
75/12/03
1200
0001
4968S
194.OJ
1*05
onoi
496*6
194.0
1205
0003
194.OJ
127 25
1210
0001
49687
194.OJ
85
42
dEISE* & AT GOODKICH (*«t •37.?)
44 39 00.0 lift 47 55.0 1
75/08/05
1510
0003
32510
104.OJ
46
5
4
2
24
75/08/06
13 30
0003
32519
104.OJ
94
64
4
2
75
1 /IS
1 <'4 • 4
7^/08/07
1350
0003
32531
104.OJ
110
42
4
4
86
75/12/03
1250
onui
4968H
5"5.0J
1255
0001
»9h89
5hs.0J
1235
0003
585.OJ
128
22
83
45
9
1300
0001
49690
585.0J
MID Fk fcEISEi? NO mTh AT h*Y -J5 fl
44 39 30.0 lift 27 05.0 1
7*3/08/05
1430
0003
32509
4h.0J
67
h?
6
2
42
75/08/06
1300
1615
01103
3251R
46.OJ
46.0
100
62
5
4
132
75/08/07
1320
0003
32530
4O.0J
102
SO
75/12/02
lsoo
0003
273.0
75/12/03
1325
0001
49691
273.OJ
1325
0003
273.OJ
101
23
89 12
3
-------
ST i TI ON N a
LiT - l.ONr-
STCWET *
I LAB I STHtAM I LAri IrtESiauE
1 I'lENT. I FLOW I PH I TOTAL
}sTE TI«t DE^Ihi NUMBER I CFS I SU I HG/L
MESIU'JE l^tSIQUE ISESIOuE 1-^ESIOUE l«dSICuE I
I TOT VOL IDISS-1 Ob t TOT NFLTIVOL NFLTI1IS5-1^0I
I Mb/L IC HG/L I MG/L I MG/L IC MG/LI
city cf coum;:l st?
Lt, At 5o.o ;i6 2^ 4o,
¦ 1537.C9
0 2
75/ncs/Db
1 E45
uoo
0O01
327b7
C1««
32707
7-3/08/06
1200
1245
0001
32769
13 00
0001
32717
75/0M/07
1200
0001
32772
7S/0B/06
1200
CO MP
52727
75/08/07
1200
75/i2/03
1415
1415
oooi
0003
49694
0.5 J
0.5J
0.5J
0.2
224
306
71
116
52
109
2rt
5U
HORKET C3£Ei< sT COUNCIL
44 44 43.(1 116 31 01.0 1
<153723
<£>
75/0H/05
1220
0003
32507
2. 0 J
106
49
6
0.5
56
75/0H/06
1245
UO03
32517
2. 0 J
132
Bn
7
4
98
1515
2.0J
75AW07
1303
0"03
32529
2.0 J
130
62
4
3
97
75/12/02
1330
0O03
70.1
75/12/03
1400
OOOI
49693
7 0 . 0 J
1400
0003
70.0 J
103
21
B9
14
4
NEISEH » aT COUNCIL T.-1.8I
44 43 5V.0 lis 26 50.0 1
•153722 75/0rf/O5
1240
0003
3250A
41 ,0J
9*
4*
7
0.5
54
75/0H/06
1230
000 3
32516
41. OJ
108
68
b
3
74
15 J 0
41.4
75/0tl/07
1245
0003
3252ft
41 .OJ
110
4b
4
3
83
76/12/02
1 4 1 0
0O03
250.0
75/12/03
1345
0001
49*92
250.OJ
1 345
0O03
25 0.0J
111
22
94
17
4
Mi fOS* ••Erses R AT COUNTY >
44 49 15.ft 11* 27 35.0 1
»i«i'i7?l
75/0£4/06
1 1 30
0003
32505
26.O.J
62
40
30
3
50
7l/'I(J/0 &
1200
0003
32515
26.OJ
*2
62
4
2
57
14 00
25.5
75/OS/07
1215
00 03
32427
26. OJ
84
42
5
4
52
75/12/02
11 15
01103
31.7
75/12/03
1455
0O01
49696
32.OJ
1455
0n03
32.OJ
SO
24
68
12
3
KEISEJ S &T F3UTTV4LE
44 49 02.0 116 26 5-
*15o720
(¦"I 76. ->)
.0 1
75/0S/05
1150
0003
32506
7.0J
127
56
3
3
102
75/0H/O6
1145
1430
0O03
32514
7.0J
6.6
13b
64
2
2
126
75/IM/07
1150
0003
32526
7.0 J
144
50
1
1
110
75/12/02
120 0
0H03
9ft. 2
75/12/03
1440
onoi
49695
9fi,UJ
1440
0003
9H.0J
114
23
101
13
3
-------
449»444«4«04«4 0«0«<>4««ft**»0«
® $T»T;on nam
e
1
Lirt
1 stream 1
L40 IXESIIJUE IRESIDUt
IrtESIOJE IRESIOUt
l*ESI0UE IQESIOJE 1 •
• L4T - LO N'i
1
IiJt'NT.
1 FLOW I
PH I TOTftL HOT vol
1DISS-1051 TOT NFLTIvOl nFLT|nJSS-1 *01 *
• STOSET »
L>tT€ TI«E DE*TH|
NUMBER
1 CPS 1
SJ 1 Mli/L 1 MO/1.
IC MG/L 1 MG/L
1 MG/L IC -o/LI •
WE ISE* » E USGS G«GE
251t »m^4.5
44 56 5«. 0 11#, 22
55.0 1
•153719
75/0^/05 1050
0O03
32504
8.0J
100 61
3
i 84
7-s/08/06 1115
0O03
32513
rt.OJ
10H 56
4
3 94
75/04/07 1120
0003
32525
7.H
116 52
3
2 32
7->/12/"2
0003
22.0
7-5/12/03 1525
0001
49697
18.0
1525
0003
1M.0
105 25
94 11
*
75/12/04
0003
1A.0
WEISEa fir E TAmA6AC<
H¥/Y
-------
* STATION I LAB I STPEAM I NH3-N ITOT K JELI N025.N03 IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-DIS IPHOS-DISIT ORG C ICHLRPHYL®
* LAT - LONT, I IDEnT. I FLOW i TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL 1 I I ORTHO t C I A UC-/L »
* STCSET 9 U4TE TI*E DEPTHI NUMBER I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I KG/L P I M5/L P t MG/L I CORRECTS*
MONROE CR AT 6»I0GE
44 14 42.0 116 57 27.0 1
"153716 75/08/04
1500
0003 ¦
32409
8.0J
0.01K
0.67
0.22
0.14
0.12
8.0
75/06/06
1150
0003
32421
H.OJ
0.03
0.92
0.25
7.0
75/08/07
1235
1740
0003
32432
H.OJ
8.4
0.02
1.00
0.26
7.0
75/12/02
1020
0001
49652
21.0 J
0.0L
0.30
0.65
0.11
0.08
75/12/04
0830
0003
21.0
REISER R AT WE I SEP
-------
00
ro
• STATION tiJfr
1
las i
STREAM 1
NH3-N HOT KJEUN
02&.N33 IPHOS-TOT
PiiOS-UIS
Ph05-*0ISIT
CRi C ICHLRFhTL»
• LAT - LOW,
1
I5EnT¦ 1
flo* i
TOTAL 1
N 1 N
-TOTAL 1
ORTHO 1
C 1 A uG/L «
• STCWET a DATE TIm£ C
£PTH t
NUMBER 1
CFS 1
mG/L 1
H&/L 1
M(j/L 1
mG/l h>
KG/L f>
mG/L p 1
MG/l ICORfcECTO*
»««««««««««•«#«««
Ck. £S WEISE3 (SH fc.3-.81
4<, 14 31 .0 116 52 00.C 1
*153713 75/08/05
1005
0003
32406
13.0 J
0.02
0.85
0.94
0.50
0.30
0.25
10.0
75/08/06.
1000
0003
32418
13.0 J
0.03
0.04
0.32
9.0
1 020
0003
3?450
13.0 J
0.05
0.64
0.30
10.0
75/03/07
1015
0003
32429
13.OJ
0.01
0.90
0.30
a.o
1630
13.1
75/12/02
1 135
OOOl
49656
5. OJ
O.OIK
0.50
2.00
0.17
0.14
1135
0003
5.0 J
¦ rflSES R &6 WEISE3 IP"-1 p. 11
4<, 15 05.0 lib 46 32.n 1
"153712 75/08/05
0950
0003
32405
86.OJ
0.01
0.73
0.37
0.18
0.11
0.07
6.0
75/03/06
1120
0003
32417
66.OJ
0.03
0 .42
0.22
a.o
75/06/07
1135
0003
32428
86.OJ
0.04
0.37
0.23
10.0
1610
86.0
75/12/02
1200
0001
49657
990.. 0 J
O.OIK
0.82
O.OIK
0.55
0.01
1205
0001
4965a
990.OJ
0.01
1 .00
O.OIK
0.52
0.01
1205
0003
990.OJ
1210
0001
49659
990.OJ
O.OIK
1.20
O.OIK
0.57
0.01
WEISE» B AT OSGS 2660 IP" 15.1)
44 16 02.0 116 <.6 01.0 1
*153711 75/OB/OS
o
-------
»4»e««e«»9E43»»
00
u>
« S TAT I ON NA*E
1
LAB 1
STREAM |
NH3-N
1 TOT KJELI N024.N03 ¦
IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-OISIPHOS-OISlT
ORG C
1 OLRFfcYL'
» LAT - LONG
1
IOENT. 1
FLOW I
TOTAL
1 N
1N-10TAL
1 1
I
OUTnO 1
C
1 A uG/L •
* STORET « DATE TI«E DEPThI
MUH?3E^ 1
CFS I
MG/L
! HG/L
1 rtG/L
1 MG/L P 1
MG/L P 1
MG/L P 1
MG/L
I CORRECTD'
KEIThLY cs H.R MIDVALE HWY 95
44 29 35.0 116 <*3 05.0 1
#153704 75/06/05
1230
0003
3240 1
l.OJ
0.01
0.73
0.12
0.16
0.11
0.06
a.o
75/05/06
1330
COO 3
324 i 2
L.OJ
0.04
O.lti
0.17
3.0
75/08/07
1300
1.0
1400
0003
32424
l.OJ
0.03
0.12
0.13
13.0
75/12/03
0945
0001
49673
I .OJ
0.02
0.17
0.32
0.05
0.02
0945
0003
1 .OJ
WEISER ». AB MIOVALE
-------
• STATION NAME I LAB I ST SEAM I NH3-N (TOT K JELI N02&.N03 IPhOS-TOTIPKOS-DISIPHOS-DISIT ORG C ICKLSPHrL*
• LAT - LONG I IDENT. t FLOW I TOTAL i M IN-TOTAL I I t ORlnO i C I A uC-/L *
• 5T0PET » OaTE TIME OEPTnl NUMBER t CPS I MG/L I HG/L 1 MG/L I mG/L H I MG/L P I mG/L t* I MG/L ICORRECTO°
CITY of CAMBRIDGE ST?
44 34 30.0 116 40 01.5 2
•153785
75/06/05
1030
0001
32766
75/08/06
1015
1030
0001
0001
32718
32768
0 . 03 J
75/08/05
1030
COvP
0.1
75/06/06
1030
75/08/05
1202
C0"P
32708
0.1J
0.49
2.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
75/08/06
1202
1600
0001
32770
75/06/07
0945
0001
32771
75/08/06
0945
COMP
32728
0.1J
CO
-------
station NAME I LiS I STREAM I NH3-N HOT K JELI N02&.N03 IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-OISIPKOS-DISIT ORG C !CM|_RFHyI«
* LAT - LO-\G I I DENT. I FLOW I TOTAL I .V IN-TOTAL I I I OrtTHO I C I « UC/L •
• STOPET * L'iTE TImE DEPTHI NU"BEK I CFS I M&/L I HG/L I MG/L I MG/L P I M&/L P I M&/L P I HG/L I COR^ECTD-"
CITY OF COUNCIL STP
44 44 50.0 116 27 40.0 2
75/08/05
1345
1200
0001
32767
CC"P
32707
in
•
o
2.60
5.50
3.00
2.60
2.00
75/08/06
1200
1245
1300
OOOl
0001
32769
32717
0.5J
7S/OS/07
1200
oooi
32772
75/1S/G6
1200
COP
32727
0 .5 J
2.30
9.00
3.50
2.70
1.50
75/08/07
1200
75/12/03
1415
14)5
0001
0003
*•9694
0.2
0.01K
0.41
0.16 0•1B
0.02
HOP'vtT C»EEK AT COUNCIL
44 44 48.0 116 31 01.0 I
75/06/05
12?0
0003
32507
2 • 0 J
0.03
0.28
0.02
0.05
0.04
5.0
75/08/06
1245
1515
0003
32517
2.0 J
2.DJ
0.02
0.02
0.04
5.0
75/08/07
1300
0003
32529
2.0J
0.03
0.03
0.06
7.0
75/12/02
1330
0003
70.1
75/12/03
1400
1400
0 001
0003
49693
70.OJ
70. 0J
0.01K
0.16
a .ib
0.04
0.01
lEISf » 'T COWCtl. (-
-------
• STATION NAVE I LAS I STREAM I NH3-N ITOT KJELIN02&N03 IPHOS-TOTIPHOS-DISIPHOS-DISIT ORG C ICNL^Phyu®
* LAT - LONG I IDE.NT. I FLOW I TOTAL I N IN-TOTAL I I I OSTHO I C I A UG/L "»
» ST03ET a uaTE TIvE OEPTH.I NUmbLW I CFS I MG/L I MG/L I MG/L I mG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L P I MG/L ICOBk£CTO»
toEISER R E USGS GAGE 2515 RM94.5
44 56 sa.o
116
22
55.0 1
*153719
75/16/OS
1050
0003
32504
8.0 J
0.
75/08/06
1115
0003
32513
8.0 J
0,
75/06/07
1120
0003
32525
7.8
0.
75/lif/02
0003
22.0
75/12/03
1525
0001
49697
18.0
0,
1525
0003
18.0
75/12/04
0003
18.0
"ISE« R E TAMAPACK
HWY95-RM95.6
1
44 58 00.0
116
23
05.0 1
#153718
75/08/05
1020
0003
32503
10.0J
0
75/08/06
1050
0003
32512
10.OJ
0
75/06/07
1040
0003
32524
10. OJ
0
02
0.25
0.01K
0.07
0.03
7.0
OIK
0.01
0.06
0.05
7.0
OIK
0.01
0.06
0.05
6.0
OIK
0.20
0.07
0.06
0.01
2.01
03
0.47
0.01K
0.03
0.03
4.0
34.17
OIK
0.01
0.03
0.03
4.0
OIK
0.01
0.04
0.03
3.0
CO
CTl
-------
0£fttft044-o4-&ft4a0s-4i#oc40ft40000«04»ft44«40ft0404ii0ii4004O04-fi4400«ii40vi>4if040ftft4if-frftOft<»ftftft4ft0tt4i40ftOft044rOfrftft4040*ft0Oft000eft04»0o*4O'4ft44ft000
» S T £ T ION N£*E I L«8 ITOT COLIIFEC COL I IFECSTREP10. P • ODTI ALDRIN I BhC ICHLSD4NEI ODD I OD£ »
* LAT - LONG I IDENT. I MF IMF.NOO I KFM-FCB?!! KF M-ENT I WHL SMPL I WrtL SMPLIWhL SKPLIWHL SMPL I WHL SMPLIWHL SMPL®
« STCSET « DATE TIME DEPTHI NU"HER I /100ML I /100ML I /100ML I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L *
44444444 a 4 44»4400eft40ft44444 4*4444444404004 *4tt4#4 440444040 44404440444404440444ft 0044 ae««eae-G«ft »«<»«««»»«ea6»«« »««««««»« 444044440
44 14 42.0 116 57 27.0 1
75/08/04
1500
0003
32409
2800
920
1300
75/0ri/06
1150
0003
32421
1900
740
11 00
75/03/07
1235
0003
32432
2000
630
75/12/02
1020
0001
49652
1 C20
G 0 0 3
670
160
4SO
44 14 44.0 116 57 25.0 1
75/03/04
1430
0003
32410
460
150
510
75/08/05
1110
0003
324 35
1000
560
820
75/08/06
1200
0003
32422
640
180
890
0.001K
O.OOIK
0.003
O.OOSK
0.012
0.005
75/06/07
1200
0003
324 33
2700
370
1200
75/12/02
0930
0001
49650
0945
0001
49651
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
0.005K
O.OOIK
O.OOIK
04 6.S-.8)
44 14 31.0 116 52 00,
*153713
0 1
75/00/05
1005
0003
32406
10000
6000
1900
75/08/06
1000
0003
3241B
2300
1400
1700
1020
0003
32450
75/08/07
1015
0003
32429
3100
1300
1600
75/12/02
1135
OOOl
49656
1135
0003
1700
890
360
-------
* STATION MM£ | lab ITOT COlIIFEC COLI 1FECSTREP 10,P« OCT I ALURIN ! BhC |OL»OANE| DDO 1 03E »
*> LAT - LONG I I DENT • I MFIMENDO! MFM-FCBRIMF M-ENTIWHL SMPLIWHL SMPLIWHL S^PLI*HL SMPLIWHL SMPLIWHL SMPL«
• STO^ET < DATE time DEPTHI NUMRER I /1OOML I /100ML I /100ML I UG/L I UG/L t UG/L I "UG/L I UG/L I U3/L »
WEISEP fi A8 KEISEfi
-------
« STATION NAft I LAB ITOT COLIIFEC COL IIFECSTREPI 0,P* DOT I ALDRIN I 6 H C ICHLRDANE1 ODD I DOE »
* LAT - LONG i IDENT. t MF IMENDO IMFM-F CHS I f.F M-£KIT I 4HL SMPLIWHL SMPLI«-tL SMPLUHL SMPLiVHL SMPL I WHL S*PL*
6 STOffET # DATE TIME DEPTH I KU'-lBER I /1OOML I /1OQML I /100ML I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L ^ UG/L f UG/L I UG/L «
WEISE3 R. NR CAMBRIDGE rn£ CR N9 CiPBQIOf,€ HtfV 95
44 33 45.0 116 41 Ol.O 1
#153728 75/08/04
1530
0003
32501
790
340
260
7S/0d/06
1515
0003
32522
690
50
280
75/OB/07
1 525
0003
32534
630
660
110
75/12/03
1045
0001
49680
1045
0003
370
370
BO
00
W3
O.OOIK O.OOIK O.OQ2 0.005K O.OOIK O.OOIK
CITY CF CflWgPIOCE 57P
44 34 30.0 116 40 01.5
•153785
75/08/05
1030
0001
32766
75/08/06
1015
0001
32718
1030
0001
32768
75/08/05
1202
COKP
32708
75/08/06
1202
1600
0001
32770
75/08/07
0945
0001
32T71
75/08/06
0945
CGfP
32728
75/08/07
0945
75/12/03
1105
0001
49681
1105
0003
1500 1OOK
1400 20 220
3500 2500 4700
O.OOIK O.OOIK 0.007 0.005K O.OOIK O.OOIK
XEISEP P* USGS GAGE ?5fi5 hH 50.3
44 34 50.0 116 38 50.n 1
75/08/05
1550
0003
32511
75/08/06
1445
0003
32520
80
1 OK
30
75/08/07
1450
0003
32532
60
32
140
75/12/03
1200
OOOl
49685
1205
0001
49686
1205
0003
270
190
230
1210
0001
49607
-------
STATION NAHE I L48 ITOT COLtlFEC COL 11FECSTREP10.P' DOT I ALORIN I dHC ICHLRDANEI ODD I Q0£ »
LAT - LONG I IDENT. IMFIMENDQIKFM-FC8R1MF M-ENTIWHL SMPL I V»HL SMPLtWHL SMPL I WHL. SMP(_ I UHL SHPLtWHL S"PL*
STOPET » DATE TIME DEPTHI NUMBER t /100ML J /100ML I J\OOML ) UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L *
WEISEP R AT GOODRICH
(RM 57.2!
44 39 00.0 116 47
55.0 1
#153725
75/08/05
1510
0003
32510
50
34
75/08/06
1350
0003
32519
110
10K
75/06/07
1350
0003
32531
40
36
75/12/03
1250
0001
49688
•255
oani
49669
1255
0003
150
140
1300
0Q01
49690
*10 FK WEISE? NP MTH
AT HKY 9$ S
44 39 3<>.0 116 27
05.0 1
#153724
75/06/05
1430
0003
32509
300
320
75/06/06
1300
0003
32516
BOO
eo
75/08/57
1320
0003
32530
SO
28
75/12/03
1325
0001
49691
1325
0003
90
64
CITY OF COUNCIL STP
44 44 50.0 116 27
40.0 2
#153749
75/08/05
1345
0001
32767
2700
2700
1200
COMP
32707
75/0B/06
1200
1245
0001
32769
40
1DK
1300
OOOl
32717
75/06/07
1200
0001
32772
75/08/06
1200
COHP
32727
75/08/07
1200
75/12/03
1415
0001
49694
1415
0003
300
98
MOPNET CREEK AT COUMTIL
44 44 48.0 116 31
01.n 1
#153723
75/08/05
1220
0003
32507
460
420
75/0fi/06
1245
0 0 03
32517
600
120
75/08/07
1300
0003
32529
24000
10000L
75/12/03
1400
0001
49693
1400
0003
410
66
WE1SER R AT COUNCIL
(PM 68.8)
44 43 59.0 116 26
so.o i
#153722
75/08/05
1240
0003
3250B
170
170
75/08/06
1230
0003
32516
380
130
75/06/07
1245
0003
32528
430
420
75/12/03
1345
0001
49692
1345
0003
160
110
92
60
20
280
0.0OIK C.C01K 0.002
0.005K
0.002K
O.OOIK
410
590
l&O
80
ID
o
1000
420
0.001K 0.001K 0.001K 0.005K O.001K 0.001K
440
100
330 0
92
140
300
200
250
-------
ft o ft o4eeooeeea6e#e«»*4oaa*««*»«44a»aoaoo44e«o««oo»«ee««tfoo«»eeoeao4<(>ooett*4a4f>oae«*aoo««»o»aoe4e0«ee»e ft oftftftftftfteftftftft ftftftftft«« «s«»
• STATION NAME I LAB I TOT COLIIFEC CCLI IFECSTREP10.P¦ OOTI ALORIN I BHC ICHLRDANEI DDO I ODE *
• LAT - LONG I IDENT. I MFJMENDOIMFM-FCBRIMF M-ENTIWHL SMPLIWHL SMPLIWHL SMPLI WML SMPLIWHL SMPLIwhl SmPL»
• STOPET « DATE TIME DEPTHl NUMBER I /100ML I /100ML I /100ML I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L I UG/L »
W FORK WEISER R AT COUNTY RD BR
44 49 10.0 116 27 35.0 1
*153721 75/0-8/05
1130
0003
32505
400
220
270
75/08/06
1200
0003
32515
300
130
180
75/08/07
1215
0003
32527
360
160
330
75/12/03
1455
0001
49696
1455
0003
52
44
54
WEISER R AT FRUITV4LE (°f 76.9)
44 49 02.0 116 26 58.0 1
75/03/05
1150
0003
32506
1300
640
490
75/08/06
1145
0003
32514
740
100
320
75/03/07
1150
0003
32526
250
110
160
75/12/03
1440
0001
49695
1440
0003
220
10
10
WEISER R E USGS GAGE 251S RM94.5
44 56 58.0 116 22 55.0 1
*153719 75/08/05 1050 0003 3H504
75/08/06 1115 0003 32513
75/03/07 1120 0003 32525
75/12/03 1525 0001 49697
1525 0003
410
140
110
20
64
78
20
20
110
0.001K 0.001K 0.002
0.005K 0.001K
0.001K
tfElSEP R E TAMAPACK HWY95-PM95.6
44 58 00.0 116 23 05.0 1
#153718 75/08/05 1020 0003 32503 50 40 66 0.001K 0.001K 0.003 O.OOSK 0.001K 0.001K
75/06/06 1050 0003 32512 60 42 70
75/08/07 1040 0003 32524 160 30 40
-------
STaT'ON M~>E I 01T I UltlDWIN | TOKPHE^E I HCHL* II 4-fOCLOK (LINDANE I I I
L**T - LC'N,'* | 4HL ShkL I wnL S^r>L I WHL SMPlIwHL b^r-L t «ML S*PL 1 l^oO I *nL S^hlI I I
STO-jET « ")aTE TI"E OEf7H| u<3/L I UG/L I UG/L I u5/L I Ub/L I uG/L I uu/l ! I I
*EISE* R tT »E I^t* f*»'Y -J-j)
44 1» 44.0 llh 5 7 25.9 ]
«iS3717 7-j/0-/Q6
7t/12/02
1200
0^45
0(103
0101
0 . C 10
0.003K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
0.050K
0.060 K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
0.OlbK
0.015K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
LOWE* PAYETTE OUCH NH *£ISE«
44 04 03.0 ll* 56 17.0 I
•153715 75/06/06
1055
0003
0.010
O.OOlK
0.060K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
O.OlbK
O.OOlK
c«A?iP cp. is »i ab »e:se«
44 17 25.1 11A ~h 4o.O 1
*153710 75/06/06
0S.1O
0003
0•00 3K
0.001K
0.060K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
0.015K
O.OOlK
SEISES ft AT MIOVALE (> 1
«15j7?tJ 75/03/06
1515
0003
0.003K
O.OOlK
0.060K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
O.OlbK
O.OOlK
city of CAu.*Kior,e stp
44 34 30.0 11* 4,1 01.5 2
¦153785 7^/03/06
1015
0001
0.003*
O.OOlK
0.060K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
0.015K
O.OOlK
VEISpa U IT r,oon^IC-( (hm 57.?)
44 3^ Oft.O 114 47 55.0 1
»1537?5 7-i/l 2/03
1255
0O01
0.003K
O.OOlK
0•060K
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
0.015K
O.OOlK
CITY OF COU*JC IL ST-'
44 44 50.0 11* 27 40.0 2
•153744 75/08/06
1300
0001
0.020K
O.OOlK
0.06QK
O.OOlK
O.OOlK
O.OlbK
O.OOlK
WFISF" *¦ f IIS^S r,/.!-,F JSli wm-)4.S
44 bb bH.r lift 22 55.0 1
«1S371<5 75/12/03 1525 0001. 0.003K 0.001K O.OSOK 0.001K 0.001K 0.015K 0.001K
xEISE-' P E T«»»S4C-: H»f<)~i--'*c;5.6
44 SB 00.0 llf> 23 01.0 1
•153718 75/OtJ/Ob 1020 0003 0.003K 0.001K 0.060K 0.001K 0.001K 0.015K O.OOlK
------- |