United States Office of Publication 9320.7-051
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and Jjone 1993
Agency Emergency Response
SERA Supplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Intermittent Bulletin
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G) Volume 3, Number 2
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
nsks to human health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
extended to September 30, 1994. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (June 1993) 4
How Sites Are Deleted* From the NPL . 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Removing Proposed Site 7
Lists and Data Summaries 8
Federal Facilities Section (by State) 9
Proposed Sites (by State) 14
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 17
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) 22
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 23
Federal Register Notices 25
-------
primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
program.
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100 An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991 It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 38 have designated top-priority sites. Six
of these sites have been deleted from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
• The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S.
Public Health Service has issued a health
advisory that recommends removing people
from the site.
• EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
• EPA anticipates it will be more cost-
effective to use its remedial authority
(available only at NPL sites) than to use its
emergency removal authority to respond to
the site.
Six sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
• Four are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York
City, NY (54 FR 48184, November 21,
1989), White Chemical Corp , Newark NJ
(56 FR 48438, September 25, 1991), and
Austin Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware
County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
1992)
• One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted from the NPL because
all appropriate response has been completed
(56 FR 46121, September 10, 1991).
• One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray
Summit, MO, was proposed on September
8, 1983 (48 FR 40674) but was dropped
from further consideration on February 11,
1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of an EPA
removal action, ATSDR had rescinded its
health advisory
?
-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances — petroleum, for example - from the
definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of
policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exists-
• The facilities are owned by persons who
have demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
• The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake
corrective action.
• The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-
by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites
• Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and
have little or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or
late filers, although they are technically
subject to RCRA, are not likely to be
cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and
so should be on the NPL. However, if such
facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA
may consider whether listing is necessary
• Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees
are not required to take corrective action for
releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u),
EPA does not have the authority to modify
a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action
until the permit is reissued. Many pre-
HSWA permits are for 10 years Since the
last pre-HSWA permit was issued pnor to
November 8, 1984, it could be 1994 before
EPA could modify some permits to include
corrective action. In these cases, EPA
believes CERCLA authorities will result in
the most expeditious cleanup.
3
-------
NPL Status (June 1993)
Sites on final NPL
• General Superfund Section
(1,076)
• Federal Facilities Section
(123)
1,199
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
1,270
• General Superfund Section
(51)
• Federal Facilities Section
(20)
71
Construction Completion List
161 *
States dropped from proposed NPL
• Policy issues (e.g., RCRA)
(43)
• HRS score below 28.50
(33)
7$
"All but 1 in General Superfund Section
• Facilities thai filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only Such facilities -- for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste ~ are not subject to Subtitle C
corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective fiUrs.
• Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA) Therefore,
this category should be 011 the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity
CERCLA Section 111(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities thai meet the
NPL eligibility requirements — eg, HRS scores ct
28 50 or greater - even if the Federal facility also is
4
-------
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
• Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
• Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
• Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
• Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore
not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the
NPL The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
incident if these releases are subject to financial
protection requirements under Section 170 of the
Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from any
processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities EPA
will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may
be deleted where no further response is appropriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria has
been met:
• EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
• EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
• A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from the NPL-
• The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
• The Regional Office obtains State concurrence
• EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and m a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment penod is provided.
• EPA responds to the comments and, if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial
action in the unlikely event that conditions in the
future warrant such action.
As of June 1993, 50 sites have been deleted from
the NPL, all in the General Superfund Section
5
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
• CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
• CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
• Revised July 16, 1982 (47FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements
• Revised March 8,1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
• Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 311801 as Appendix A of the NCP
• Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
• Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP
• Must be updated at least annually
• Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11, 1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
• First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
• First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR
47181)
• Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)
6
-------
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of June 1993, 79 sites (see page 17) have been
proposed for the NPLbut subsequently removed from
further consideration, most of them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites
were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
8
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
Oate
St
Site Name
Ci ty/County
Proposed
Final
AK
Adak Naval Air Station
Adak
10/92
AK
Eielson Air Force Base
Fairbanks K Star Bor
07/89
11/89
AK
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Greater Anchorage Bo
07/89
08/90
AK
Fort Richardson (US Amy)
Anchorage
05/93
AK
Fort Uainwright
Fairbanks N Star Bor
07/89
08/90
AK
Standard SteelSMetals Salvage Yard(USOOT
Anchorage
07/89
08/90
4 Final * 2 Proposed = 6
AL
Alabama Army Arrmunition Plant
Childersburg
10/84
07/87
AL
Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
Ami ston
10/84
03/89
AL
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
Huntsvilie
05/93
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
AZ
Luke Air Force 8ase
Glendale
07/89
08/90
AZ
Uilliams Air Force Base
Chandler
07/89
11/89
AZ
Tuna Marine Corps Air Station
Tuna
06/88
02/90
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 3
CA
Barstow Marine Corps Logistics Base
Barstow
07/89
11/89
CA
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
San Diego County
07/89
11/89
CA
Castle Air Force Base
Merced
10/84
07/87
CA
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Concord
02/92
CA
Edwards Air Force Base
Kem County
07/89
08/90
CA
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
El Toro
06/88
02/90
CA
Fort Ord
Marina
07/89
02/90
CA
George Air Force Base
VictorviIle
07/89
02/90
CA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Pasadena
02/92
10/92
CA
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (Site 300)
Livermore
07/89
08/90
CA
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USOOE)
Livermore
10/84
07/87
CA
March Air Force Base
Riverside
07/89
11/89
CA
Mather Air Force Base
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
McClellan Air Force Base (GW Contain)
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
Moffett Naval Air Station
Sunnyvale
04/85
07/87
CA
Norton Air Force Base
San Bernardino
10/84
07/87
CA
River bank Army Annum ion Plant
Riverbank
06/88
02/90
CA
Sacramento Army Depot
Sacramento
10/84
07/87
CA
Sharpe Army Depot
Lathrop
10/84
07/87
CA
Tracy Defense Depot
Tracy
07/89
08/90
CA
Travis Air Force Base
Solano County
07/89
11/89
CA
Treasure Island Naval Stat ion-Hun Pt An
San Francisco
07/89
11/89
21 Final + 1 Proposed = 22
CO
Air Force Plant PJKS
Waterton
07/89
11/89
CO
Rocky Flats Plant {USOOE)
Golden
10/84
10/89
CO
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
Adams Cocnty
10/84
07/87
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 3
CT
New London Submarine Base
New London
10/89
08/90
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
DE
Oover Air Force Base
Dover
10/84
03/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
FL
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Jacksonvilie
07/89
11/89
FL
Homestead Air Force Base
Homestead
07/89
08/90
9
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
J me 1993
Oate
St Site Norae City/Cotnty Proposed Final
FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station
FL Pensacola Naval Air Station
4 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 4
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
HI Schofield Barracks
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IA Iowa Amy Amnunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Lab (US006)
ID Hoimtain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Nfg Area)
IL Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NUR (USOOI
IL Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 4
KS Fort Riley
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
LA Louisiana Array Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
HA Fort Devens
HA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
HA Hanscon Air Force Base
HA Hateriala Technology Laboratory(US Array)
HA Natick Laboratory Amy Research,04E Cntr
HA Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
HA Otis Air National Guard /Camp Edwards
HA South Weymouth Naval Air Station
3 Final ~ 5 Proposed = 8
HD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
HO Aberdeen Proving Ground(MichaelsviIle LF
HD Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Middletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
CarterviIle
Savanna
Junction City
Paducah
Ooyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
8edford
Uatertown
Natick
Bedford
Falmouth
Weymouth
Edgewood
Aberdeen
BeltsviIle
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/84
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/B4
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
05/93
05/93
05/93
05/93
07/89
05/93
04/85
0A/85
05/93
11/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
02/92 10/92
10/92
08/90
07/89 08/90
11/89
08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
07/89 08/90
05/93
10/84 03/89
11/89
02/90
11/89
02/90
10/89
2 Final ~ 1 Proposed = 3
10
-------
national
Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section,
Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
Date
St
Site Name
City/Couity
Proposed
Final
HE
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Brunswick
10/84
07/87
HE
Loring Air Force Base
Limestone
07/89
02/90
ME
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Kittery
05/93
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
UN
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
Fridley
07/89
11/89
HN
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
Minneapolis
01/87
07/87
2 Final * 0 Proposed = 2
HO
Lake City Army Ainnu. Plant (HU Lagoon)
Independence
10/84
07/87
HO
Ueldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
St.Charles County
10/84
07/87
HO
Ueldon Spring Cuarry/Plant/Pitts(USOOE)
St. Charles County
07/89
02/90
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 3
NC
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
Onslow County
06/88
10/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
NE
Cornhusker Army Annum"tion Plant
Hall County
10/84
07/87
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
NH
Pease Air Force Base
Portsmouth/Newi rvgton
07/89
02/90
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
NJ
Federal Aviation Adnin. Tech. Cntr(USOOT
Atlantic County
07/89
08/90
NJ
Fort Dfx (Landfill Site)
Pemberton Township
10/84
07/87
NJ
Naval Air Engineering Center
Lakehurst
09/85
07/87
NJ
Naval Weapons Station Eerie (Site A)
Colts Neck
10/84
08/90
NJ
Pieatimy Arsenal
Rockaway Township
07/89
02/90
NJ
W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USOOE)
Wayne Township
09/83
09/84
6 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 6
NH
Cal West Hetals (USSBA)
Lemitar
06/88
03/89
NH
Lee Acres Landfill (USOOI)
Farmington
06/88
08/90
2 Final * 0 Proposed = 2
NY
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE)
Upton
07/89
11/89
NY
Griffiss Air Force Base
Rome
10/84
07/87
NY
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Plattsburgh
07/89
11/89
NY
Seneca Army Depot
Romulus
07/89
08/90
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
ON
Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE)
Fernald
07/89
11/89
OH
Hound Plant (USOOE)
Kiamisburg
07/89
11/69
OH
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
Oayton
06/88
10/89
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 3
OK
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
Oklahoma City
04/85
07/87
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
OR
Fremont Nat. Forest Uraniun Nines (USOA)
Lake County
05/93
OR
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
Hermiston
10/84
07/87
1 Final ~ 1 Proposed = 2
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
Oate
St
Site Ham
Ci ty/County
Proposed
Final
PA
Letterkermy Amy Depot (POO Area)
Franklin County
04/85
03/89
PA
letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
Chanittrsburg
10/84
07/87
PA
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Warminster Township
06/86
10/89
PA
Tobytiama Array Oepot
Tobytiama
07/89
08/90
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
PR
Naval Security Group Activity
Sabana Seca
06/88
10/89
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
R1
Oavisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
North Kingstown
07/89
11/89
fil
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
Newport
07/89
11/89
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
SC
Savannah River Site (USOOE)
Aiken
07/89
11/89
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
SO
Ellsworth Air Force Base
Rapid City
10/89
08/90
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
TN
Memphis Defense Depot
Memphis
02/92
10/92
TN
Mf lan Army A/nmxi i 11 on Plant
Mi lan
10/84
07/87
TN
Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
Oak Ridge
07/89
11/89
3 Final ~ 0 Proposed ¦= 3
TX
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Fort Worth
10/84
08/90
TX
Lone Star Army Aimuiition Plant
Texarkana
10/84
07/87
TX
Longhorn Army Amnuiition Plant
Kernack
07/89
08/90
TX
Pantex Plant (USOOE)
Pantex Village
07/91
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
UT
Hill Air Force Base
Ogden
10/84
07/87
UT
Honticello Hill Tailings (USOOE)
Honticello
07/89
11/89
UT
Ogden Defense Depot
Ogden
10/84
07/87
UT
Tooele Army Oepot (North Area)
Tooele
10/84
08/90
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
VA
(Defense General Supply Center
Chesterfield County
10/84
07/87
VA
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Hampton
05/93
VA
Marine Corps Corbat Development Command
Quantico
05/93
VA
Naval Surface Uarfare - Oahlgren
Oahlgren
02/92
10/92
VA
Naval Weapons Station - Torktown
Yorktown
02/92
10/92
3 Final ~ 2 Proposed = 5
UA
Bangor Naval Sitotaarine Base
SiIverdale
07/89
08/90
UA
Bangor Ordnance Disposal
Bremerton
10/84
07/87
UA
Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USOOE)
Vancouver
07/89
11/89
UA
Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Uaste Areas)
Spokane County
06/88
03/89
UA
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Tacoma
10/84
07/87
UA
Fort Lewis Logistics Center
Tillicun
07/89
11/89
UA
Hamilton Island LandfiIKUSA/COE)
North Bonneville
07/91
10/92
WA
Hanford 100-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
UA
Hanford 1100-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
UA
Hanford 200-Area (USOOE)
Benton County
06/88
10/89
12
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
June 1993
Date
St Site Narae City/County Proposed Final
UA Han-ford 300-Area (USOOE)
UA Jackson Park Housing Corp Iex (US Navy)
UA KcChord Air Force Base (Uash Rack/Treat)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Is (Seaplane)
UA Naval Air Station, Uhidbey Island (Ault)
UA Kaval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
UA Port Hadlock Detachment (US Navy)
VA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
15 Final ~ 3 Proposed = 18
W Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 Final « 1 Proposed = 1
WY F.E. Uarren Air Force Base
1 Final ~ 0 Proposed = 1
123 Final ¦* 20 Proposed = 143
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Uhidbey Island
Uhidbey Island
Keyport
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral County
Cheyenne
06/88 10/89
05/93
10/84 07/87
09/85 02/90
09/85 02/90
06/86 10/89
05/93
05/93
05/93
07/89 02/90
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June 1993
St
Sita Nam
Location
Notes
a
AK Federal Facility Sites
Adak Naval Air Station
Fort Richardson (US Army)
0 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites = 2
AL General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drun Co.
Del Amo Facility
GSF, Inc., Dunp
Stoker Company
Federal Facility Sites
Concord Naval Weapons Station
U General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 5
CO General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant}
Sroeltertoun Site
Sumitville Mine
3 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal facility Sites = 3
FL General Siperfund Sites
Broward Couity--21st Manor Dunp
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tanpa Plant)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpons Springs)
General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
HI General Superfind Sites
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
1 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sues = 1
Adak
Anchorage
Florence
Huntsvilie
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Inperial
Concord
Denver
Salida
Rio Grande County
Fort Lauderdale
DeLand
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Honolulu County
IA General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Waterloo
ID General Superfund Sites
8lackbird Mine
Triimph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
Lemhi County
Triimph
IN General Siperfund Sites
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
1
KY General Stperfml Sites
National Southwire Aluninun Co.
Federal Facility Sites
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
1 General Suserfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
HA General Superfund Sites
Blackburn & Union Privileges
Federal Facility Sites
Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology Laboratory(US Army)
Natick Laboratory Army Research,D&E Cntr
East Chicago
Hawesvilie
Paducah
Ualpole
Bedford
Uatertoun
Natick
14
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June 1993
St Sit* Mane Location
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
South Weymouth Naval Air Station
1 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 6
HO General Superfund Sites
Ordnance Products, Inc.
Spectron, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
2 General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
ME Federal Facility Sites
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
0 General Superfind Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
UN General Superfund Sites
Lake Elmo Airport /GW Contamination
1 General SLperfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
MS General Superfund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
2 General Si^xrftnd Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
KC General Superfund Sites
General Electric Co/Shepherd Farm
1 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites = t
NE General Superfund Sites
American Shizuki/Ogallala Electronics Co
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NJ General Superfund Sites
Horseshoe Road
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NM General Siperfund Sites
AT&SF (Albuquerque)
Rinchem Co., Inc.
2 General Superfund Sites ~ 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
MY General Si^serfund Sites
Onondaga Lake
Pfohl Brothers Landfill
2 General Si^aerfund Sites •» 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
ON General Siperfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesvilie Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
Worth Sanitary landfill
3 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites - 3
OK General Superfind Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
OR General SLperfund Sites
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Conram.
HeCormick & Baxter Creos. Co. (Portland)
Federal Facility sites
Fremont Nat. Forest Uraniifn Mines (USOA)
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
Bedford
Weymouth
Cecil County
Cecil County
Beltsvilie
Kittery
Baytown Township
Gulfport
Wesson
East Flat Rock
Ogallala
Bruno
Sayrevilie
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Syracuse
Cheektowaga
Painesvi(le
Oover
Dayton
Bartlesvilie
Multnomah County
Portland
Lake County
Notes8
15
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
June J 993
St Site Name Location Notes9
PA
General SuperfLrid sites
UGI Colurbia Gas Plant
1 General Siperfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
S
1
Colurbia
SC
General Siperfird Sites
Coppers Co., 'Inc. (Charleston Pint)
1 General SLperfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
s
\
Charleston
SO
General Superfund Sites
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Siperfurvd Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
_
1
Lead
TH
General Superfind Sites
ICG Iselin Railroad Yard
1 General Siperfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
_
1
Jackson
TX
General Superfund Sites
ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay
RSR Corp.
Federal Facility sites
Pentex Plant (USOOE)
Z General Superfund Sites ~ 1 Federal FaciLity Sites
3
Point Comfort
Oallas
Pantex Village
UT
General Siperfund Sites
Richardson Flat Tailings
1 Ceneral Sjperfuid Sites «¦ fl Federal F-aci lity Sices
1
Suimit County
VA
Federal Facility Sites
Lengley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Caibat Cevelopment Camand
0 General Superfund Sites ~ 2 Federal Facility Sites
2
Hampton
Ouartr ico
VI
General Superfund Sites
Tutu Wellfield
t General Superfuid Sites + 0 federal Facility Sites
_
1
Tutu
UA
General Superfund Sites
Pacific Sound Resources
Spokane Junkyard and Associated Prop
Tulalip Landfill
Vancouver Uater Station #1 Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
Jackson Park Housing Complex (US Navy)
Port HadLock Detachment (US Navy)
Puget Socrid Naval Shipyard Conplex
^ General SiperfuxJ Sites + 3 Federal Facility Sites
7
Seattle
Spokane County
Marysvilie
Vancouver
Kitsap Cointy
Indian Island
Bremerton
UI
General Superfvnd Sites
Ripon City Landfill
1 General Superfirid Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites
_
1
Fond Du Lac County
wv
Federal Facility Sites
Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 General Si4)erfird Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites
=
1
Mineral County
51 General Superfund Sites + 20 Federal Facility Sites
= 71
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
16
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St
Site Name
Location
Proposed
Score8
Otherb
AR
Allen Transformer
Ft. Smith
10/23/81
47FR 58476
12/30/82c
AR
Crittenden County Landfill
Marion
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/08/83
47FR 40658
AR
Magnolia City Landfill
Magnolia
10/26/89
54FR 43778
08/30/90
55FR 35502
AZ
Kingman Airport Industrial Area
K i ngman
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/21/84d
49FR 37070
AZ
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
Mesa
6/10/86
51FR 21099
02/08/91
56FR 5598
CA
FHC Corp. (Fresno PUnt)
Fresno
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Hewlett-Packard
Palo Alto
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
IBM Carp. (San Jose Plant)
San Jose
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
Fontana
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Kearney-KPF
Stockton
6/24/88
53FR 23988
08/30/90
53FR 35502
CA
Marley Cooling Tower Co.
Stockton
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Precision Monolithic, Inc.
Santa Clara
10/15/84
49FR 40320
06/10/86
51FR 21054
CA
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp.
East Palo Alto
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Signetics, Inc.
Sunnyvale
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Solvent Service, Inc.
San Jose
6/24/88
53FR 23988
08/30/90
55FR 35502
CA
Southern Pacific Transportation
Rosevilie
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CA
Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
San Jose
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
CO
Martin-Marietta(Denver Aerospace)
Uaterton
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
OC
USA Fort Lincoln 8arrel Site
Washington
10/23/81
12/30/82e
47FR 58476
OE
Old Brine Sludge Landfill
Delaware City
17
9/08/83
48FR 40674
09/24/84
49FR 37070
-------
Proposed Sites Removed Fran Consideration for NPL
Juie 1993
Date
Removed
St
Site Name
Location
Proposed
Score8
Other''
OE
Pigeon Point Landfill
Hew Castle
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/04/89
54FR 41015
FL
Oavidson Lurber Co.
South Miami
10/15/84
49FR 40320
06/10/86
51FR 21054
FL
Kontco Research Products, Inc.
Hoi Iister
10/15/84
49FR 40320
03/31/89
54FR 13296
FL
Pratt £ Whitney Air/United Tech
West Palm Beach
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
GA
Olin Corp. (Areas 1,2 & 4)
Augusta
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/04/89
54FR 41000
HI
Kunia Wells I
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
HI
Kunia Wells II
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
HI
Nilitani Wells
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
HI
Uaiawa Shaft
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
HI
Waipahu UelIs
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
HI
Uaipio Heights Wells II
Oahu
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91f
56FR 5598
IA
A.r. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Dubuque
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
IA
Chemplex Co.
Clinton/Camanche
10/15/84
49FR 40320
02/08/91
56FR 5598
IA
Frit Industries (Hixitooldt Plant)
Hurtsoldt
4/10/85
50FR 14115
10/04/89
54FR 41000
IA
John Deere (Difcuque Works)
Dubuque
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
IA
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Mount Vernon
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
ID
Flym Lunfcer Co.
CaldwelI
12/30/82
47FR 58476
09/08/83
48FR 40658
IL
Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
Sheffield
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
IL
Stauffer Chem (Chic Heights Pint)
Chicago Heights
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/04/89
54FR 41015
IL
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co
Roscoe
6/24/88
53FR 23988
08/30/90
55FR 35502
IS
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
St Site Name
Location
Removed
Proposed Score
Other
IN Firestone Industrial Products Co.
IN Mccarty's 8ald Knob Landfill
IN Parrot Road Dunp
ICS National Industrial Environ Serv
HI E.I. du Pont (Montague Plant)
MI Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
MI Hooker (Montague Plant)
MI Lacks Industries, Inc.
HI Lenawee Disposal Service, Inc. Landfill
HI Littlefield Township Ourp
HO Findett Corp.
HO Quail Run Mobile Hartor
HS Gautfer Oil Co., Inc.
HS Plastifax, Inc.
MT Burlington Morthern(Somers Plant)
NT Comet Oil Co.
HE Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
NE Phillips Chemical Co.
NJ Horstmarm's Durp
NJ Jame Fine Chemical
Noblesville
Mt. Vernon
New Haven
Furley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapids
Adr ian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Surmit
Gautier
Gulfport
Soniers
Bi I lings
Cozad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
9/1B/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41015
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
5FR 35502
09/08/83h
48FR 40658
02/08/91
56FR 5598
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/10/861
51FR 21054
10/04/89 |
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
02/08/91®
56FR 5598
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89 ¦
54FR 41000
19
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for MPL
Jiy>e 1993
Date
Removed
St
Site Name
Location
Proposed
Score6
Other''
NJ
Matlack, Inc.
Woolwich Township
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/04/89
54FR 41000
OH
General Electnc
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
June 1993
Date
Removed
St Site Name Location Proposed Score8 Other''
eQn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, Oec enter 30, 1982),
,a Federal facility site an so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
®Ho longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Si&stances and Disease Registry.
•On Expanded Eligibility List annomced July 23, 1982; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, Oecenber 30, 1982) because
JRemoved per SARA Section 118(p)
NOTE: The following four sites were proposed, removed, and then reproposed. In this case, the site has been listed:
- Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, OH, proposed Oecember 30, 1982 (47FR 58476); removed Septent>er 8, 1983 (48FR
40658); reproposed October 15, 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
These three sites have been reproposed under the revised HRS:
• Concord Naval Weapons Station, Concord, CA: proposed June 24, 1983 (53FR 23988); removed August 30, 1990 (55FR
35502); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• GBF, inc., Antioch, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015); reproposed
February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• Richardson Flat Tailings, Sumiit County, UT: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed February 11, 1991
(56FR 5598); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
21
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Total Sites)
June 1993
Final Proposed
State/Territory
Gen
Fed
Gen
Fed
Total
New Jersey
102
6
1
0
109
Pennsylvania
94
4
1
0
99
California
69
21
4
1
95
New York
79
4
2
0
B5
Michigan
76
0
0
76
Florida
47
4
4
0
55
Washington
33
15
4
3
55
Minnesota
38
2
1
0
41
Wisconsin
39
1
0
40
Illinois
33
4
0
0
37
Ohio
30
3
3
0
36
Indiana
32
1
0
33
Massachusetts
22
3
1
5
31
Texas
24
3
2
1
30
South Carolina
22
1
1
0
24
Virginia
19
3
0
2
24
Missouri
20
3
0
0
23
North Carolina
20
1
1
0
22
Iowa
18
1
1
0
20
Kentucky
18
1
1
20
Delaware
18
1
0
0
19
Colorado
12
3
3
0
18
New Hampshire
16
1
0
0
17
Connecticut
14
1
0
0
15
Tennessee
11
3
1
0
15
Alabama
10
2
1
1
14
Georgia
11
0
0
13
Utah
8
4
1
0
13
Arkansas
12
0
0
12
Louisiana
11
1
0
0
12
Maryland
7
2
2
1
12
Oregon
8
1
2
1
12
Rhode I si and
10
2
0
0
12
New Mexico
7
2
2
0
11
Oklahoma
9
1
1
0
11
Arizona
7
3
0
0
10
Idaho
6
2
2
0
10
Kansas
9
1
0
0
10
Maine
7
2
0
1
10
Nebraska
7
1
2
0
10
Puerto Rico
8
1
0
0
9
Alaska
2
4
0
2
8
Montana
8
0
0
0
8
Vermont
8
0
0
0
8
West Virginia
5
0
0
1
6
Mississippi
2
0
2
0
4
South Dakota
2
1
1
0
4
Hawaii
0
2
1
0
3
Wyoning
2
1
0
0
3
Guan
1
1
0
0
2
North Dakota
2
0
0
0
2
Nevada
1
0
0
0
1
Virgin Islands
0
0
1
0
1
American Samoa
0
0
0
0
0
Commonwealth of Marianas
0
0
0
0
0
District of Colombia
0
0
0
0
0
Trust Territories
0
0
0
0
0
Total 1076 1 23 5 1 20 1 270
22
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
June 1993
Final Proposed
Re® State/Territory Gen Fed Gen Fed Total
Iowa
16
1
1
0
20
Kansas
9
1
0
0
10
Missouri
20
3
0
0
23
Nebraska
7
1
2
0
10
54
6
3
0
63
Co Iorado
12
3
3
0
18
Montana
8
0
0
0
8
North Dakota
2
0
0
0
2
South Dakota
2
1
1
0
4
Utah
8
4
1
0
13
Wyoming
2
1
0
0
3
34
9
5
0
48
Cormonwealth of Marianas
0
0
0
0
0
American Samoa
0
0
0
0
0
Arizona
7
3
0
0
10
California
69
21
4
1
95
Guam
1
1
0
0
2
Hawaii
0
2
1
0
3
Nevada
1
0
0
0
1
Trust Territories
0
0
0
0
0
78
27
5
1
111
Alaska
2
4
0
2
B
Idaho
6
2
2
0
10
Oregon
8
1
2
1
12
Washington
33
15
4
3
55
49
22
8
6
85
Total
1076
123
51
20
1270
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
Sites
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
115
115
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
160
160
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
418
418
March 4, 1983 (48 FR9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
419
419
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL, 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
406
140
546
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
410
136
546
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #\ sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
538
4
542
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
538
248
786
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule 82)
540
246
786
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
540
278
818
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3)
541
277
818
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
| (Proposed Rule H4)
541
318
859
25
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
June 10, 1986(51 FR 2(054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
703
185
888
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 2J099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986(51 FR2LI09)
proposed RCRA policy, reopening of comment period for
5 siles
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
703
2481
951
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5573)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 11991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27629)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
802
149
951
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility siles)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23976)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
799:
318
1,177
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule it7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7,
4 proposed sites dropped)
8903
213
1,163
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
890
283
1.173
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule 89
8891
335
1.224
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
8S9
337
i
26
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
Number of Sites
Final
Proposed
Total
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
9813
213
1,194
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
981
238
1,219
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed
Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility
site)
1,010
209
1,219
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9,
1 proposed site dropped)
1,081
137
1,218
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
1,082
136
1,218
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10, 10
proposed sites dropped)
1,187J
20
1,207
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10,
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
1,1893
0
1.189
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
1.1883
1
1.189
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
1,188
23
1.211
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
1.1853
22
1.207
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
1,183'
52
1,235
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12),
first final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
1,2083,4
28
1.236
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
1,2023,4
54
1 256
27
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
Number of Sites J
Final
Proposed
Total
June 1993
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
i.w^4
71
1,270
'No Federal Register notice.
5Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section ll8(p).
'Reflects stte(s) deleted since last rule.
'Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
28
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
F *tier information, call Che Superfund Hotline, toll-free
24-9346 or (703) 920-9810 in Washing Ion, _DC
meuupolitan area, or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices
fistedbekw.*
For pvMcalions, contact
Public Information Center, PM-211B
401M Street, SW
Washington. DC 20460
202)260-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, OS-5204G
United States Environmental Protect on Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(703)603*8860
Reqion 1
Connecticut
New Hampshire
Maine
Rhode Island
Massachusetts Vermont
Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-1
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-2211
(617) 573-5707
Reqion 2
Hew Jersey
Puerto Rico
jw York
Virgin Islands
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-8672
Region 3
Delaware
Pennsylvania
District of Columbia Virginia
Maryland
West Virginia
Sue Assessment Section, 3HW73
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215) 597-8229
Region 4
Alabama
Mississippi
Florida
North Carolina
Georgia
South Carolina
Kentucky
Tennessee
Waste Management division
345 Courtland Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404) 347-5065
Reqion 5
Illinois
Minnesota
Indiana
Ohio
Michigan
Wisconsin
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 353-9419
Region 6
Arkansas
Oklahoma
Louisiana
Texas
New Mexico
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214) 655-6740
Reaion 7
Iowa
Missouri
Kansas
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913)551-7062 or S51-7595
Region 8
Colorado
South Dakota
Montana
Utah
Norlh Dakota Wyoming
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
(303) 294-7630
Region 9
American Samoa Guam Northern Marianas
Arizona
Hawaii Trust Territories
California
Nevada
Waste Management Division, H-l
75 Hawthorne Sueet
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415)744-1730
Region 10
Alaska
Oregon
Idaho
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, W A 98101
(206) 553-1677
% All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
accessed via (he Federal Telecommunications System (FTS).
------- |