Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Final Report
TESTING OF 35 IN-USE DIESEL VEHICLES IN DENVER
Contract No* 68-03-2891
Task Order No, 3
Modification No, 1
prepared for:
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
May 22, 1981
651 chambers road, suite 200
303-343-8939
aurora, Colorado 80011
-------
Final Report
TESTING OF 35 IN-USE DIESEL VEHICLES IN DENVER
Contract No. 68-03-2891
Task Order No. 3
Modification No. 1
prepared for:
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
May 22, 1981
submitted by:
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
651 Chambers Road, Suite 200
Aurora, Colorado 80011
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 2-1
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 2-1
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN 2-1
r
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT 2-1
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection 2-1
2.3.2 Incentives for Owner Participation 2-2
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Selection and Screening Criteria 2-2
2.3.4 Test Vehicle Preconditioning Procedure 2-2
2.4 VEHICLE TEST FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT 2-2
2.4.1 Particulate Emission Test Equipment 2-3
2.5 VEHICLE TEST PLAN 2-4
2.6 LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES 2-4
2.6.1 Test Vehicle Preparation Procedures 2-4
2.6.2 Federal Test Procedure (Mass Exhaust Emission Test) 2-5
2.6.3 Highway Fuel Economy Test Procedure 2-6
2.6.4 Particulate Test Procedure 2-6
2.6.5 Four Speed Idle Test 2-7
2.6.6 Loaded Two Mode Test 2-7
2.6.7 After Test Procedure 2-7
2.6.8 Test Vehicle Depreparation 2-7
2.7 DATA PROCESSING PROCEDURES 2-8
2.7.1 Data Collection 2-8
2.7.2 Data Review and Editing 2-9
-------
2.7.3 Calculation of Test Results 2-10
2.7.3.1 Federal Test Procedure Emission Data 2-10
2.7.3.2 Highway Fuel Economy Test 2-10
2.7.3.3 Four Speed Idle Test 2-10
2.7.3.4 Loaded Two Mode Test 2-10
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1, Exhaust Emission Test Results by Model Year
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is designated under the
provisions of the Clean Air Act as having responsibility for the control and prevention of
air pollution. In order to fulfill these responsibilities, the EPA designs, conducts and
promotes surveys and studies of air pollution sources.
National programs to characterize and reduce air pollution from mobile sources are
developed and implemented through EPA's Emission Control Technology Division (ECTD).
Mobile emission control strategies developed by the ECTD are based, in part, on
projections of nationwide motor vehicle emissions. These projections are derived from
surveys designed to obtain emission data from representative samples of m-use vehicles.
With the recent changes m standards relative to emissions and fuel economy there
has been an increase in the population of diesel powered light duty vehicles. With this
increase the effects of diesel-powered vehicles are of relatively greater importance.
Accordingly, the EPA issued a Task Order contract to gather information regarding the
effects of altitude on gaseous and particulate emissions from diesel light-duty trucks and
passenger cars. This report describes the design and conduct of the project and presents
test results.
1-1
-------
2. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
2.1 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
This task order was performed to provide information on the various levels of
emissions for thirty five (35) m-use 1978 and newer model-year diesel-powered vehicles
operated in the Denver metropolitan area.
2.2 PROGRAM DESIGN
Testing was performed on a sample of thirty-five diesel vehicles recruited from the
Denver metropolitan area. Actual vehicle selection was co-ordinated with and approved
by the EPA project officer.
Vehicles selected for testing are detailed in Appendix A, Listing of Vehicles and
Test Parameters.
Upon arrival a: the laboratory, each vehicle was examined to insure that no
extensive modifications had been performed and that the vehicle was safe to operate.
Each vehicle received a single test sequence conducted to determine the as-
received level of emissions. The test sequence consisted of a basic engine status
inspection, a twelve to thirty-six hour soak, a non-evaporative Federal Test Procedure
with particulate sampling, a Highway Fuel Economy Test with particulate sampling, a
Four Speed Idle Test, and a Loaded Two Mode Test.
2.3 TEST VEHICLE PROCUREMENT
2.3.1 Test Vehicle Selection
The thirty-five vehicles selected for this task were procured from the Denver
metropolitan area. The test sample was comprised of fifteen light-duty pick-up trucks
(any make) and twenty passenger cars, seven of which were General Motors vehicles, five
of which were Mercedes Benz, three of which were Peugot and five of which were
Volkswagen.
Candidate vehicles were acquired exclusively through registration mailings. '
2-1
-------
2.3.2 Incentives for Owner Participation
The incentives provided to owners of test vehicles to encourage participation m the
program were
o Use of a late model, fully insured loan vehicle while testing was being conducted,
o A S100 U. S. Savings Bond, and
o Return of the owner's vehicle with a full tank of fuel.
2.3.3 Test Vehicle Selection and Screening Criteria
Those vehicle owners indicating a willingness to participate provided information
by filling m a postage-paid vehicle information reply card for a preliminary comparison
between the EPA approved vehicle list and their vehicle. If the vehicle was determined
to meet testing criteria and the owner remained willing to participate in the program,
the vehicle was scheduled for delivery to the laboratory for a physical inspection and
screening procedure.
Prospective test vehicles were given an examination for test suitability upon their
arrival at the laboratory and were accepted or rejected based upon this examination.
Any questions regarding vehicle test suitability were resolved by the EPA project
officer.
2.3.4 Test Vehicle Preconditioning Procedure
Following acceptance into the program, the test vehicles fuel tanks were drained
and then refilled to forty per cent capacity with Diesel-type II test fuel.
2.4 VEHICLE TEST FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT
The ATL test facilities and associated equipment utilized in this Task Order are
located at 19900 East Coifax Avenue, Aurora, Colorado. The laboratory is at an altitude
of 5,480 feet above sea level. Prior to testing, a representative of the EPA visited the
laboratory where facility and equipment procedures were checked. Typical emission
testing equipment was used m the conduct of the program excepting the particulate
measuring apparatus which is discussed on the following page.
2-2
-------
2.4.1 Paiticiilate Emission Test Equipment
The particulate emission sampling equipment consisted of a dilution air filtration
system, a tunnel, and sample collection system. E"cept for the filters, which are of
filter paper and charcoal construction, the filter housing is of stainless steel construc-
tion. The tunnel is also of stainless steel construction; the overall length of the tunnel
section is twelve feet and it is ten inches in diameter. The sampling system is a dual
pump design which allows collecting separate samples during each phase of the FTP. The
sampling system operates as follows:
Dilution air enters the assembly and is filtered. A particle, a charcoal and a final
filter assembly is provided for this purpose. After filtration, the dilution air enters
the tunnel where it is combined with exhaust from the vehicle. Vehicle exhaust
enters the tunnel through a four inch diameter, ninety degree bend elbow. The
point at which the exhaust is introduced to the dilution air stream is about one and
one-half feet from the outlet of the dilution air filter box. At this introduction
point a mixing orifice is installed. The mixing orifice, of seven inches in diameter,
is situated in the plane described by the four inch, ninety degree exhaust
introduction tube bend termination. This plane is perpendicular to the round wall
of the tunnel. From this mixing plane the diluted exhaust flows to the plane at
which it enters the transition piece which reduces stream diameter from the ten
mches of the tunnel to the lour inches of the CVS collection tube. This transition
is made in about one and one-half feet. The only obstruction from the mixing point
to the start of the transition piece is the sample probe. The CVS collector tube,
also of stainless steel construction, carries the dilute exhaust into the CVS. During
particulate testing, dilution air from the CVS filter box is closed off by means of
a flapper valve that is pneumatically activated. Beyond the flapper valve, dilute
exhaust flow within the CVS is normal. The tunnel and remote dilution box is
merely an extension of normal flow paths within the CVS.
The sample probes are one-half inch diameter stainless steel tubes. These tubes
face upstream and originate about ten feet from the dilution air exhaust mixing
point. From its point of origin the tube runs parallel to the tunnel for about five
inches, ma''es a forty-five degree bend, continues another three inches, makes
another forty-five degree bend and passes through the tunnel wall. Immediately
outside the tunnel wall, the filter assembly, which holds a forty-seven millimeter
diameter "Pallflex" filter (type 460A20), is situated. The particulate emissions are
collected on this filter. From this point the filtered sample continues through an
on-off valve, a pump, a flow control valve, a flowmeter and a dry gas meter. The
on-off valve is used to start and stop sample flow at the beginning and end of the
test phase. The pump moves sample through the filter. The flow control valve is
used to regulate the sample stream flow. This valve is manually adjusted
frequently and as necessary during the test. The dry gas meter is used to totalize
sample flow during the test phase. A solenoid valve wired into the bag sample
system directs the flow through one of two filter assemblies, allowing separate
collection of particulate emissions during each of the three phases of the FTP and
during the HFET.
2-3
-------
2.5 VEHICLE TEST PLAN
The test sequence performed at the ATL facility was
o A Federal Test Procedure (without evaporative test, with particulate sampling),
o A Highway Fuel Economy Test (with particulate sampling)
o A Four Speed Idle Test, and
o A Loaded Two Mode Test.
Prior' to this test sequence, the vehicles were soaked for twelve to thirty-six hours.
Following the test sequence, a procedural review was conducted to assure that
exhaust emission tests had been performed as prescribed by the EPA. If any problems
were determined, the vehicle was again soaked and tested.
After-test inspections were performed on the vehicles to determine the status of
certain engine components.
Vehicles were returned to their owners upcn completion of testing.
2.6 LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES
Each vehicle received a prescribed sequence of test and inspection procedures
during the course of the task. These procedures and others associated with the conduct
of the program included the following:
Vehicle Preparation
Federal Test Procedure
Highway Fuel Economy Test
Particulate Test Procedure
Four Speed Idle Test
Loaded Two Mode test
After Test Procedures
Test Vehicle Depreparation
Details of these tests and procedures are presented in the following sections.
2-4
-------
2.6.1 Test Vehicle Preparation Procedures
All vehicles selected for testing received a uniform series of preparation proce-
dures to maintain standard testing conditions and to avoid possible vehicle malfunctions.
After acceptance of a vehicle into the program, as-received fuel was drained and
the tank v. as then refilled to forty per cent capacity with Diesel-type II fuel. The pressures
of the tires on the drive wheels were adjusted to thirty-five psi for all test vehicles.
Test preparation procedures were performed m the laboratory at a location
separate from the soak and emission test areas.
2.6.2 Federal Test Procedure (Mass Exhaust Emission Test)
The Federal Test Procedure (FTP) was performed in accordance with procedures
specified m 42 Federal Register 124. Preconditioning requirements for this test include
a twelve to thirty-six hour soak period in an area with an ambient temperature between
20 and 30 degrees Centigrade (68 to 86 Fahrenheit). Each vehicle remained stationary
while soaking with the ignition m the unlock position, the transmission in neutral and all
accessories m the off position.
None of the vehicles acquired for this task received those segments of the FTP
which deal with evaporative loss measurements. Consequently, following the soak
period, test vehicles were moved to the dynamometer for the mass exhaust emission
segment of the FTP.
Before the test vehicle was placed on the dynamometer and secured, the proper
inertia weight and load adjustments were set. During those portions of the test with the
engine operating, the vehicle hood was opened and a cooling fan was placed in front of
the vehicle grille.
The Federal Test Procedure consists of three sequential segments: the cold
transient stage, the cold stabhzed stage and the hot transient stage. Sampling for the
initial cold transient portion was begun simultaneously with engine crank. This segment
continued for 505 seconds at an average speed of 25.6 miles per hour over a cumulative
2-5
-------
distance of 3.59 miles. At the 505 second point, the exhaust sample was diverted from
the first sample bag of the Constant Volume Sampler (CVS) to the second bag. This
marked the beginning of the cold stabilized portion of the test. This segment covers 3.91
miles at an average speed of 16.0 miles per hour. Its duration is 869 seconds. At the end
of this phase the engine was stopped, sampling was terminated and the vehicle was
soaked on the dynamometer for ten minutes. After soaking, the vehicle was restarted
and sampling was switched to the third CVS bag for 505 seconds at an average speed of
25.6 miles per hour. CVS sample and background bags were analyzed within ten minutes
after completion of each segment of the test.
2.6.3 Highway Fuel Economy Test Procedure
The Highway Fuel Economy Test (HFET) consisted of vehicle operation on the
dynamometer over a 10.2 mile, 765 second driving schedule with the vehicle in a
warmed-up condition. Before testing was begun, each vehicle was driven at high cruise
(50 mph) on the dynamometer for three minutes. Within one minute of the end of the
cruise period, the vehicle was brought to idle and the test begun. During the entire
driving schedule, CVS dilute exhaust was diverted into a sample bag. Sampling was
terminated at the end of the schedule and the content of the sample bag was analyzed.
Load settings, inertia weights and vehicle speed tolerances for the HFET were
identical to those used during the Federal Test Procedure.
2.6.4 Particulate Test Procedure
Samples of particulate exhaust emissions were collected for each of the three
phases of the FTP and for the HFET using the equipment described m Section 2.4.1. For
the FTP both sample systems were used. During the cold transient phase dilute exhaust
sample was drawn through the filter m filter assembly #1, at the 505 second point the
cold stabhzed phase began and sample was drawn through the filter m filter assembly #2.
During the ten minute soak a new filter was placed in filter assembly #1 which was then
2-6
-------
used during the Hot Transient phase. Filter assembly #1 ivas used during the HFET. The
weights of particulates collected were determined by weighing the filter before the test
and the combined particulate and filter after the test.
2.6.5 Four Speed Idle Test
The Four Speed Idle Test consisted of four operating modes (three modes for
vehicles equipped with manual transmissions) and was preceded by a six (+_ 1} minute idle
period wit)i the cooling fan on and the engine compartment open. At the end of the six
minutes, the vehicle was operated at curb idle in neutral, idle at approximately 2500 rpm
m neutral, curb idle in neutral, and for vehicles equipped wjih automatic transmission, at
curb idle in the drive position. Each of the operating modes was maintained for a
maximum of three minutes. Raw tailpipe samples were analyzed at each speed after
rpm and analyzer outputs had stabilized for a minimum of thirty seconds,
2.6.6 Loaded Two Mode Test
The Loaded Two Mode Test consisted o[ two steady state operating modes and was
preceded by a six (+ 1) minute idle period with the cooling fan on and the engine
compartment open. At the end of the six minutes, the vehicle was operated at low
cruise (thirty mph) for a maximum of three minutes. This operating mode was followed by
vehicle operation at idle m neutral for a maximum of three minutes. For the cruise
mode of this test a horsepower setting of 9-0 was used and dynamometer inertia weight
was set to the minimum level. Raw tailpipe samples were analyzed for each operating
mode after rpm and analyzer outputs had stabilized for a minimum of thirty seconds.
2.6.7 After Test Procedures
Vehicle engine equipment was checked after the test sequence to further document
test conditions. The status of certain engine components such as air conditioning and
turbo charging were noted and recorded.
2.6.8 Test Vehicle Depreparation
Before a vehicle was returned to its owner, the following procedures were
2-7
-------
performed:
1. Tire pressures were adjusted to their original levels.
2. Test vehicle fuel tanks were refilled to full capacity.
3. Visual checks were performed to assure that the general condition of the
vehicle was the same as when it was delivered to the laboratory.
2.7 DATA PROCESSING PROCEDURES
Accumulated raw test data and associated materials received a systematic review
of each test point in the task from initial generation to final processing. These data
accumulation and review procedures are described below.
2.7.1 Data Collection
Emission test procedures and laboratory conditions were monitored and controlled
through the use of strip chart recorders. These units provided a constant read-out of
data and also served to document test activities for later review. Test parameters
registered on the recorders included emission analyzer outputs, wet and dry bulb
temperatures of the air directed to the front of the test vehicle and dilute exhaust
stream temperatures. Driver and vehicle performance traces were also documented on a
strip chart recorder and included speed calibrations and calibration checks performed
before and after each test.
Sample flow rates, gas meter temperatures and readings and other data pertinent
to the particulate system were recorded on data forms.
A NOVA 2 minicomputer was utilized to collect and integrate CVS sample and
background bag emission data. Speed/time profiles were generated for each test
schedule by the computer and produced on the driver and vehicle performance trace.
The computer also totalized and recorded CVS mass pump revolutions during each
exhaust emission test segment.
Movement of each test vehicle through segments of the task was controlled
through and documented on various data sheets. All data forms were collected in test
2-8
-------
packets v. hich were assigned to each vehicle prior to testing. As testing progressed,
relevant sheets were completed, signed and returned to the packet by the appropriate
technician. Included in the packet were: all data sheets used to identify the vehicle,
data sheets used during tests, analyzer strip chart recordings, computer system sheets
and magnetic tapes, and all applicable temperature strip chart recordings.
Laboratory personnel were also furnished a form indicating the daily test schedule
including the order each vehicle was to be tested and the estimated duration of each test
segment. Preconditioning personnel were also furnished with a similar schedule
indicating the time each vehicle was to be placed in soak.
2.7.2 Data Review and Editing
Vehicle packets were reviewed for completeness, accuracy and compliance with
temperature and speed tolerances on a test by test basis. This review was performed as
soon as possible after each test to allow for a timely and appropriate solution to any
problems. The test packet was again reviewed after all tests had been completed. After
resolution of any discrepancies, the completed packet was forwarded to the data
processing department.
Data processing procedures included an additional review of packet contents by
personnel not directly involved m the original tests. Following this review, data from
the on-site NOVA 2 minicomputer and from the manually prepared data sheets were
combined into a single magnetic tape which was input to an offsite, time-share
computer. When obvious data entry errors had been resolved and corrected, a
computerized edit program was applied to the data. This program subjects each entry to
a test of reasonableness. If recorded information failed to fall within a predetermined
range, the computer indicated the presence of a possible error and identified the area
requiring investigation. Any discrepancies found at this stage were resolved either
through further clarifying information from test personnel, reference to test records or
through a partial or complete retest of the vehicle.
2-9
-------
When all problems were resolved, the data were reduced and printed for a final
review before the test was declared valid. The completed data packets were then
delivered to the EPA.
2.7.3 Calculation of Test Results
2.7.3.1 Federal Test Procedure Emission Data - Mass emission test results were
calculated using equations specified in 42 Federal Register 124. Fuel economy data for
this test were calculated using the carbon balance equation. Calculations were made
using distance constants of 3.59 and 3.91 miles respectively for the transient and
stabilized modes.
2.7.3.2 Highway Fuel Economy Test - Exhaust emission results for this test were
calculated using Federal Register equations and a distance constant of 10.242 miles.
Fuel economy was calculated using the mass emission results and the carbon balance
equation.
2.7.3.3 Four Speed Idle Test - Emission results from th2s test were comprised of
undiluted tailpipe concentrations and reported as measured.
2.7.3.4 Loaded Two Mode Test - Emission results from this test were comprised of
undiluted tailpipe concentrations and reported as measured.
2.7.3.5 Particulate Test Data - Results for this test were calculated using the flow rates
of the sampling system, filter weights, meter readings and other collected information
using the equations presented m Appendix J.
The results presented here are of a quantitative nature. The filters have been sent
to the EPA for qualitative analysis.
2-10
-------
TABLE 1
-------
TABLE 1
Vehicle Type &
Model Year
CARS 1980
1979
1978
ALL
TRUCKS 1980
1979
1978
ALL
EXHAUST EMISSION TEST RESULTS BY MODEL YEAR
DENVER DIESELS
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
# of Average
Veh Odom HC
7 10,713 0.79
9 26,262 0.53
4 38,273 0.70
20 23,222 0.66
2 11,092 1.48
6 16,866 1.27
7 43,855 1.33
15 28,691 1.33
CO C02 NOxc
1.67 448.4 1.03
1.83 352.4 1.38
1.68 364.9 1.07
1.74 388.5 1.20
2.34 538.8 1.43
2.51 547.8 1.38
3.92 522.3 1.52
3.15 534.7 1.45
Fuel Economy
FTP HFET
22.44 31.20
28.51 34.97
27.52 35.26
25.87 33.60
18.60 24.33
18.31 22.86
19.10 23.70
18.71 23.45
3-1
-------
APPENDICES
-------
a.PPENDIX A - LISTIKG OF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAMETERS
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
YR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
CYL - Number of cylinders
BBL - Number of carburetor Venturis (F: fuel injected)
T - Type of transmission (A: automatic; 2: semi-automatic;
3: 3-speed manual; 4: 4-speed manual; 5: 5-speed manual)
ENGINE FAMILY - Engine family
AC - Vehicle ecuippec uith air conditioning. IT: yes; ?1: no'
?T - ?l&1 tsr]k capacity ir. gallons
I.WT - Dynamometer inertia weight setting for Federal Test
Procedure
A.HP - Actual road load horsepower setting for Federal Test
Procedure
ACL - Was 1055 AHP added to simulate air conditioner
(M: manufacturer's certification AHP setting)
TEST NO. - Contractor run number
TEST DATE - Date of test (month/day/year)
DB - Dry bulb temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
WB - Wet bulb temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
BARO. - Barometric pressure (inches Hg)
A-i
-------
APPENDIX A
LISTING CF VEHICLE AND TEST PARAJ1ETZRS
DENVER DIESELS
C B
VEH. Y B
NO. YR HAKE MODL CID L L T
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
011
012
013
014
015
016
017
013
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
033
034
035
ENGINE FAMILY
78 G1C C150 350 8 F A 832J9
80 CHEV STAW 350 8 F A 03J9ZG
78 CMC C150 350 8 F A 832J9
79 VOLK RABB 090 4 F 4 D
80 0LC6 88 350 8 F A 03J9ZG
80 PONT BONN 350
80 CHEV C10 350
79 tERB 24CD 146
80 OLDS 88
8 F A 03J9ZG
8 F A 09J9Z
4 F A 79/2/L4D/24
F A 03J9ZG
78 IH SCOU 198 6 F 4 SD331
350 8
73 CHEV C10 350 8 F A 832J9
78 OLDS 98 350 8 F A 830J9
78 VOLK RABB 090 4 F 4 D
79 OLDS STAW 350 8 F A 930J9
80 FOOT BONN 350 8 F A 03J9ZG
79 GC C150 350 8 F A 932J9
78 MERB 240D 147 4 F 4 78/2/L4D/24
79 VOLK RABB 090 4 F 4 D
79 FEUG 504 141 4 F A XD
79 CHEV C10 350 8 F A 932J9
80 CHEV C10 350 8 F A 09J9Z
80 IIERB 300D 183 5 F A 80.21.35.30
79 fiERB 240D 146 4 F A 79/2/L4D/24
79 VOLK RABB 090 4 F 4 D
78 CHEV C10 350 8 F A 832J9
79 liERB 300D 183 5 F A 79/2/L5D/30
79 CMC C150 350 8 F A 932J9
79 QIC C150 350 8 F A 932J9
78 CHEV C10 350 8 F A 832J9
78 GC C150 350 8 F A 832J9
79 QIC C150 350 8 F A 932J9
78 PEDG 504 141 4 F A XD
79 G'lC C150 350 8 F A 932J9
79 PEUG 504 141 4 F A XD
80 VOLK RABB 090 4 F 4 D
A
A C TEST
C FT I.wr A.HP L NO.
N
TEST
DATE
Y 26 4500 19.5 M D002 01/06/8
Y 22 4500 13.2 M D028 01/09/8
N 26 4500 19.5 M D008 01/07/8
N 11 2250 7.3 M D005 01/06/8
Y 27 4000 12.2 M D007 01/07/8
Y 27 4000 12.2 M D009 01/07/8
Y 20 4500 17.0 H D010 01/07/8
Y 21 3500 12.6 M D006 01/07/8
Y 27 4000 12.2 M DC12 01/07/8
N 20 4000 15.6 M D042 01/13/8
N 26 4500
Y 27 4500
Y 11 2250
Y 27 4500
Y 27 4000
26 4500
21 3500
11 2250
18 3500
20 4500
20 4500
21 3500
21 3500
11 2250
N 26 4500
19.5 M D011 01/07/8
12.5 M D015 01/08/8
7.3 H D014 01/08/8
13.3 M D017 01/08/8
12.2 M D018 01/08/8
19.5 M D021 01/09/8
12.3 H D030 01/12/8
7.3 M D019 01/08/8
11.8 M L024 01/09/8
19.5 H D026 01/09/8
17.0 H D020 01/08/8
12.6 H D023 01/09/8
12.6 M D025 01/09/8
7.3 M D035 01/13/8
19.5 M D027 01/09/8
Y 21 4000 13.2 M D032 01/12/8
Y 26 4500 19.5 M D031 01/12/8
Y 26 4500 19.5 M D033 01/12/8
Y 26 4500 19.5 M D034 01/12/8
M 26 4500 19.5 M D038 01/13/8
Y 26 4500 19.5 M D041 01/13/8
Y 18 3500 12.3 M D036 01/13/8
Y 26 4500 19.5 M DD40 01/13/8
N 18 3500 11.8 M D037 01/13/3
N 11 2250 6.8 M D039 01/13/8
EB WB BARO.
54 24.71
55 24.78
77 56 24.54
74 51 24.67
76 57 24.54
76 57 24.54
77 56 24.54
77 53 24.53
77 54 24.58
76 57 24.78
76
77
76 54 24.58
75 55 24.57
76 54 24.50
78 53 24.74
77 50 24.83
74 50 24.54
76 57 24.79
77 59 24.75
77 51 24.57
75 56 24.78
73 55 24.78
75 51 24.70
76 53 24.78
74 55 24.74
75 55 24.82
77 54 24.70
76 53 24.72
78 55 24.73
74 56 24.77
77 55 24.72
76 55 24.74
75 55 24.75
76 52 24.72
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE it 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
A - 1
-------
APPENDIX 3 - LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
HAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
TESTfTYPE - Indicates the portion of the test or composite
BASE - Measured as-received from vehicle owner with
indolene fuel
COLD TRANS - Cold transient portion of test
COLD STABI - Cold stabilized portion of test
HOT TRANS - Hot transient portion of test
75 FTP - 1975 Federal Test Procedure composite
EMISSION RESULTS
(gin/mi) - Emission results measured in grams per mile
HC - Hydrocarbon emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon monoxide emissions in grams per mile
CO^ - Carbon dioxide emissions in grams per mile
N0xc - Oxides of nitrogen emission corrected for humidity in
grams per mile
FUEL ECON MPG - Fuel economy calculated by the carbon balance method in
miles per gallon
IHC - Hydrocarbon concentration with vehicle at normal idle,
measured with garage-type instrumentation in parts per
million hexane equivalent
ICO (act) - Carbon monoxide concentration with vehicle at normal idle,
measured with garage-type instrumentation in mole per cent
ICO (spec) - Carbon monoxide concentration with vehicle at normal idle,
as specified by the manufacturer (N/A: no specifications
available).
OTHER TESTS - Lists other emission factor tests conducted on the vehicle
HFET - Vehicle was used in Highway Fuel Economy test
SHORT TESTS - Vehicle was used in the series of Short Tests
B-i
-------
APPENDIX B
L1S1ING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. MODL
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
FUEL
—EMISSION RESULTS (gm/mi)- ECON
HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
001 1978 GMC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 28 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
002 1980 CHEV STAW 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 14 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
003 1978 GMC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 17 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
001 1979 VOLK RABB 090 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 46 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
005 1980 OLDS 88 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 6 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
006 1980 PONT BONN 350
IHC: 9 ppm hexane
ICO [act]
ICO [spec]
OTHER TESTS
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
HFET, SHORT TESTS
007 1980 CHEV C10 350
IHC: 14 ppm hexane
ICO [act] ~ ~ ""
ICO [spec]
OTHER TESTS
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
HFET, SHORT TESTS
2.03
1.67
1.52
1.70
0.75
0.56
0.51
0.58
1.67
0.99
0.81
1.08
0. 5^
0.34
0.54
0.44
0.85
0.32
0.27
0.41
0.50
0.31
0.28
0.34
1.84
1.25
0.93
1.29
3.24
2.82
2.86
2.91
2. 10
1.46
1.86
1.70
2.79
2. 12
2.01
2.23
1.58
0.78
1.38
1.11
2.29
1.14
1.95
1.60
1.98
1.17
1.82
1.51
2.50
2.07
1.85
2. 10
601.3
496.6
503.2
519.9
550.6
521.3
478.3
515.6
592.9
484.9
493.3
509.4
251.8
221.1
215.5
225.9
533.0
453.9
444.0
467.5
565.7
488.7
455.8
495.6
584.4
526.4
490.8
528.6
1.54
1.67
1.49
1.59
0.97
1.16
0.92
1.05
16.61
20.10
19.86
19.20
18.29
19.37
21.07
19.57
1.30 16.89
1.32 20.71
1.29 20.39
1.31 19.71
0.83
0.92
3?:H
56
0.85 46.39
0.88 44.44
0.93
1.08
0.88
0.99
0.97
1.19
0.92
1.07
1.38
1.61
1.41
1.51
18.87
22.28
22.72
21.59
17.84
20.70
22.15
20.39
17. 13
19.07
20.49
18.99
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE § 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
B - 1
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. MODL
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
FUEL
—EMISSION RESULTS (gm/mi)- ECON
HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
008 1979 MERB 240D 146 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 24' ppra hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CQ BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
009 1980 OLDS 88 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 12 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CQ BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
010 1978 IH SCOU 198 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 10 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [actl: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
011 1978 CHEV C10 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 21 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.1 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TtSTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
012 1978 OLDS 98 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 20 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
013 1978 VOLK RABB 090
IHC: 17 ppm hexane
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO
ICO [spec]: N/A ?CO
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
BASE HOT TRANS
BASE 75 FTP
014 1979 OLDS STAW 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 18 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 ?CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %C0 BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TtSTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
0.58
0.24
0.35
0.34
0.83
0.43
0.30
0.48
1.91
0.98
0.79
1. 12
1-31
1.18
0.81
1.10
1.64
1.17
0.90
1.19
0.64
0.38
0.46
0.45
1.80
1.23
0.91
1.26
2, 12
1.32
1.66
1.58
1.79
1.19
1.07
1.28
21.53
5.11
17.29
11.81
2.33
2.13
1.68
2.05
2.61
2.29
1.95
2.26
2.16
1.13
2.01
1.58
3.33
2.40
2.58
2.64
456.0
347.5
378.5
378.3
455.2
492.8
563.1
532.0
495.8
528.5
589.5
501.3
483.9
514.7
528.5
485.8
450.4
484.9
244. 7
213.2
210.3
218.9
598.6
514.4
492.6
525.8
1.85
1.54
1.73
1.66
0.98
1.19
0.96
1.08
22.06
29.05
26.62
26.65
18.05
20.77
22.23
20.50
1.93 16.88
2.04 18.73
1.78 If ""
1.94 1}
m
1.15
1.16
1.11
1.14
1.11
1. 19
1.19
1. 17
0.77
0.82
0.80
0.80
1.80
2.11
1.73
1.94
17.04
20.02
20.80
19.52
18.92
20.64
22.30
20.67
40.68
47.07
47.34
45.67
16.70
19.49
20.37
19.06
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD. SUITE It 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
B - 2
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. tiODL
NO. YEAR HAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
FUEL
—EMISSION RESULTS (gm/tni)- ECON
HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
015 1980 POHT BONN 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 39' ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.1 5&CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
016 1979 GHC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 19 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %C0 BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
017 1978 MERB 240D 147
IHC: 12 ppm hexane
ICO [act]
ICO [spec]
OTHER TESTS
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
0.0 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
N/A JCO BASE 75 FTP
HFET, SHORT TESTS
018 1979 VOLK RABB 090 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 28 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.1 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A £C0 BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
019 1979 ?EUG 50*4 mi BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 22 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.1 %C0 BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
020 1979 CHEV CIO 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 16 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
021 1980 CHEV CIO 350
IHC: 21 ppm hexane
ICO [act]
ICO [soec]
OTHER TESTS
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
0.0 $CO BASE HOT TRANS
N/A 2CO BASE 75 FTP
HFET, SHORT TESTS
4.05
2.78
2.44
2.95
2.45
1.39
1.10
1.53
0. 30
0.28
0.13
0.25
1.07
0.64
0.65
0.73
0.33
0. 16
0.26
0.22
0.96
0.92
0.82
0.90
2. 12
1.66
1. 34
1.67
4.46
2.74
3.03
3.18
3.56
2.58
2.32
2.71
1.17
1.14
0.81
1.06
2.01
1.25
2.36
1.71
3.63
0.95
2.64
".96
2.81
2.11
2.27
2.30
3.18
2.54
2.20
2.58
570.9
501.4
485.2
511.3
574.0
489.1
489.9
507.0
394. 1
3^5.6
331.9
351.8
246.8
223.2
224.3
228.3
440 . 1
316.0
373. 1
372.7
660. 3
530.8
549.7
562.6
607.2
540.3
521.6
549.0
0.75
0.90
0.73
0.82
1.36
1.40
1.51
1.42
1.29
1.26
1.22
1.26
0.88
0.91
1.01
0.93
1.12
1.18
1.02
1. 12
1 .40
1.51
1. 40
1.46
17.22
19.78
20.45
19-36
17.32
20.44
20.47
19.72
25.64
29.22
30.50
28.72
40.17
44.79
44.23
43.61
22.77
29.25
26.92
27.03
15.24
18.95
18.31
17.88
1.30 16.44
1.38 18.52
1.33 19.23
1.35 18.23
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE # 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
B - 3
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. MODL
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID TEST TYPE
FUEL
—EMISSION RESULTS (gm/mi)- ECON
HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
022 1980 MERB 300D 183
IHC: 12 ppm hexane
ICO [act]: 0.0 JCO
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
BASE HOT TRANS
BASE 75 FTP
0.46
0.47
0.36
0.41
0.44
0.31
0.29
0.33
BASE
COLD TRANS
1.01
3.75
265.2
BASE
COLD STABL
0.49
1.35
221.b
BASE
HOT TRANS
0.80
3- 65
225.4
BASE
75 FTP
0.68
2.47
234.7
BASE
COLD TRANS
1.48
3.16
618.8
BASE
COLD STABL
0.96
2.61
508.6
BASE
HOT TRANS
0.81
2.33
509.6
BASE
75 FTP
1.02
2.65
531.5
023 1979 HERB 240D 146 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 10 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %C0 BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A %C0 BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
024 1979 VOLK RABB 090
IHC: 14 ppm hexane
ICO [actl: 0.1 %CO
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO
025 1978 CHEV C10 350
IHC: 12 ppm hexane
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
026 1979 HERB 300D 183 BASE COLD TRANS 0.52
IHC: 21 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL 0.58
ICO [act]: 0.0 %C0 BASE HOT TRANS 0.32
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP 0.50
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
027 1979 GMC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS 1.59
IHC: 19 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL 1.54
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CO BASE HOT TRANS 0.90
ICO [spec]: N/A %CO BASE 75 FTP 1.37
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
028 1979 GMC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS 1.63
IHC: 25 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL 1.38
ICO [act]: 0.1 %CO BASE HOT TRANS 0.87
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP 1.29
OTHER TtSTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
1.20
1.06
1.03
1.08
2.58
2.05
1.66
2.05
2. 17
2.02
1.55
1.92
2.76
2.53
1.97
2.43
2.79
2.56
1.96
2.44
507.6
374.8
399.2
408.8
460.5
355.6
378.6
383.4
543.3
438.2
413.0
453.0
612.1
549.4
523.4
555.2
654.2
569.0
546.0
580.2
1.34
1.19
1.20
1.22
2.27
1.84
2.13
2.01
0.94
1.03
1.01
1.01
19.92
26.93
25.31
24.71
21.84
28.28
26.63
26.25
37.09
44.00
43.54
42.26
1.70 16.19
1.69 19.73
1.59 19.73
1.66 18.88
1.57
1.47
1.42
1.48
1.50
1.52
18.56
22.96
24.43
22.24
16.37
18.23
1.45 19.22
1.50 18.06
1.30
1.25
1.24
1.26
15.33
17.62
18.44
17.30
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES.INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE // 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
B - 4
-------
APPENDIX B
LISTING OF FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURE RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VE'H. MODL
NO. YEAR MAKE HODL CID TEST TYPE
FUEL
--EMISSION RESULTS (gm/mi)- ECON
HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
029 1978 CHEV CIO 350
IHC: 24 ppm hexane
ICO [act]: 0.1 JCO
i*
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STABL
BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
030 1978 GMC C150 350
IHC: ]4 ppm hexane
BASE COLD TRANS
BASE COLD STAEL
BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO
03 1 1979 GtlC CI50 350 EASE COLD TRAKS
IHC: 11 ppm hexane EASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: KFET, SHORT TESTS
032 1973 PEUG 504 141 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 57 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [actl: 0.1 SCO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
033 1979 GMC C150 350 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 14 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 SCO bASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
034 1979 PEUG 504 141 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 16 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [actl: 0.0 %CO BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TESTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
035 1980 VOLK RA3B 090 BASE COLD TRANS
IHC: 09 ppm hexane BASE COLD STABL
ICO [act]: 0.0 %CQ BASE HOT TRANS
ICO [spec]: N/A SCO BASE 75 FTP
OTHER TlSTS: HFET, SHORT TESTS
2.57
1.95
1.58
1.98
1.52
1.06
0.91
1.12
1.42
0.80
0.73
0.91
1.79
1. 44
1.08
1.41
0.49
0.28
0.19
0.30
0. 41
0.25
0.30
0. 30
3.60
2.94
2.58
2.98
1.24 3.53
1.46 2.77
1.09 2.34
1.32 2.81
3.27
2.40
2.46
2.60
2.72
1.38
1.91
1.80
3.12
2.63
2.09
2.58
1.78
1.01
1.00
0.90
1.70
1.34
628.4
490.3
517.5
526.2
613.4
503.5
503.9
526.2
602.7
522.2
519.9
538. 1
482.4
377.0
395.7
403.8
623.2
522.2
525.5
543.9
367.4
369.3
253.5
250.7
228.3
24 7.2
1.20
1.06
1.17
1.12
15.85
20.31
19.32
18.95
1.90 16.34
t.go 19.86
1.80 19.91
1.87 19.03
1.30 16.61
1.29 19.22
d5
1.30 1<
1.29 l!
1.07
1.06
0.96
1.03
1-33
1.38
1.38
1.37
20.72
26.66
25.38
24.85
16.06
19.17
19.12
18.42
1.35 23.17
1.4'
+6
1.27
1.39
0.89
1.09
0.87
0.99
2?:s5
27.37
37.97
40.23
^3.89
40.66
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES.INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD. SUITE II 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
B - 5
-------
APPENDIX C - LISTING OF FTP PARTICULATE TEST
RESULTS OH INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
'MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
DATE - Date of test (month/day/year)
TEST - Contractor Run Number
SEGMENTS - Indicates the cumulative sample of Cold Transient, Cold Stabilized
and Hot Transient portions of the related Federal Test Procedure.
CT - Cold transient
CS - Cold stabilized
HT - Hot transient
MILLIGRAMS - Filter weight gain measured in milligrams
CUBIC FEET - Vehicle exhaust volume measured in cubic feet
GRAMS - Particulates, in the vehicle exhaust, calculated in grams
GRAMS/MILE - Particulates calculated to grams per mile
C-i
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FTP PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEri. MODL MILLI CUBIC GRAMS/
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID DATE TEST SEGMENTS GRAMS FEET GRAMS MILES
001
1978
GMC
C150
350
01/06/81
D002
CT
CS
HT
6.900
7.000
6.850
2.46
4.32
2.53
5.737
5.690
5.516
1.598
1.455
1.537
002
1980
CHEV
STAW
350
01/09/81
D028
CT
CS
HT
3.710
2.310
4.340
2.50
4.47
2.46
3.041
1.821
3.597
0.847
0.466
1.002
003
1978
GMC
C150
350
01/07/81
D008
CT
CS
HT
3.720
2.700
2.970
2.48
4.32
2.48
3.053
2. 174
2.411
0.850
0.556
0.672
004
1979
VOLK
RABB
090
01/06/81
D005
CT
CS
HT
1.310
0.650
0.9^0
2.60
4.45
2.55
1.027
0.513
0.753
0.286
0.131
0.210
005
1980
OLDS
88
350
01/07/81
D007
CT
CS
HT
3.350
1.230
2.260
2.44
4.22
2.45
2.786
1.018
1.859
0.776
0.260
0.518
006
1980
PONT
BONN
350
01/07/81
D009
CT
CS
HT
3.810
1. 420
2.060
2.44
4.25
2.46
3.156
1.161
1.679
0.879
0.297
0.468
007
1980
CHEV
C (0
350
01/07/81
D010
CT
CS
HT
3.510
2. 540
2.510
2.51
4.23
2.49
2.815
2.413
2.036
0.784
0.617
0.567
008
1979
MERB
240D
146
01/07/81
D006
CT
CS
HT
3-300
2.960
2.610
2.51
4.37
2.43
2.693
2.379
2. 184
0.750
0.609
0.608
009
1980
OLDS
88
350
01/07/81
D012
CT
CS
HT
3.070
1.480
1.650
2.48
4.24
2.45
2.492
1.207
1.364
0.694
0.309
0.380
010
1978
IH
SCOU
198
01/13/81
D042
CT
CS
HT
9. 160
3. 120
7.650
2.45
4.24
2.43
7.671
2.575
6.396
2. 137
0.659
1.782
01 1
1978
CHEV
C10
350
01/07/81
D011
CT
CS
HT
2.700
2.690
5.900
2.49
4.37
2.49
2. 181
2. 144
4.796
0.608
0.548
1.336
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE it 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FTP PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. HODL
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID DATE
MILLI
TEST SEGMENTS GRAMS
CUBIC GRAMS/
FEET GRAMS MILES
012 1978 OLDS 98 350 01/08/81 DO 15
013 1978 VOLK RABS 090 01/08/81 D014
014 1979 OLDS STAW 350 01/08/81 D017
015 1980 PONT BONN 350 01/08/81 D018
016 1979 GI1C C150 350 01/09/81 D021
0" 7 1975 HEEB 24CC 14? 01/12/81 D030
0 ¦ 8 1979 VOLK P.ABB 090 01/06/81 DO 19
019 1979 PEUG 504 141 01/09/81 D024
020 1979 CKEV CIO 350 01/09/81 D026
021 1980 CHEV CIO 350 01/08/81 D020
022 1980 MERB 300D 183 01/09/81 D023
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
KT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
CT
CS
HT
4. 100
3.710
3.970
1.540
0.860
1.580
7.380
5.270
5.900
9.800
3.120
5.220
8.040
6.020
5.810
1.490
1.540
1.210
2. 4^0
1. 050
2.270
2.990
0.820
2.040
4.560
2.810
3.490
4. 170
3.930
3.660
1.600
1. 140
1.260
2.44 3.420
4.24 3.050
2.45 3.293
2.46 1.278
4.36 0.693
2.43 1.326
2.52 5.942
4.29 4.272
2.35 5.070
2.49 7.979
4.28 2.543
2.45 4.302
2.44 6.779
4.33 4.908
2.43 4.910
2.43
".33
2.49
1.230
1.253
1.000
2.55 1.960
4.36 O.815
2.50 I.&L5
2.50 2.449
4.34 0.661
2.43 1.707
2.48 3.758
4.28 2.298
2.48 2.843
2.50 3.387
4.33 3.179
2.50 2.980
2.41
4.35
2.47
1.363
0.923
1.044
0.953
0.780
0.917
0.356
0.177
0.369
1.655
1.093
1.412
2.222
0.650
1.198
1.888
1.255
1.368
0.343
0.320
0.278
0.552
0.2' 6
0.5 "14
0.682
0.169
0.476
1.047
0.588
0.792
0.943
0.813
0.830
0.380
0.236
0.291
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE # 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTIiiG OF FTP PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. MODL MILLI CUBIC GRAMS/
imO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID DATE TEST SEGMENTS GRAMS FEET GRAMS MILES
023
1979
MERB
240D
146
01/09/81
D025
CT
CS
HT
5.210
4.420
2.330
2. 49
4.37
2.43
4.285
3.552
1.952
1. 194
0.909
0.544
024
1979
VOLK
RABB
090
01/13/81
D035
CT
CS
HT
3.770
1.450
3.340
2.46
4.18
2.41
3.129
1.217
2.834
0.872
0.311
0.790
025
1978
CHEV
C10
350
01/09/81
D027
CT
CS
HT
8.000
6.140
6.090
2.45
4.31
2.50
6.630
4.986
4.973
1.847
1.275
1.385
026
1979
MERB
300D
183
01/12/81
D032
CT
CS
HT
2.900
2.540
2.020
2. 44
4.35
2.55
2.418
2.043
1.618
0.674
0.523
0.451
027
1979
GI1C
C150
350
01/12/81
D031
CT
CS
HT
7.720
3.270
3.830
2.53
4.32
2.46
6.287
2.662
3.192
1.751
0.681
0.889
028
1979
GMC
C150
350
01/12/81
D033
CT
CS
HT
3.270
3. 150
2.640
2.52
4.46
2.49
2.653
2.470
2.158
0.739
0.632
0.601
029
1978
CHEV
C10
350
01/12/81
D034
CT
CS
HT
5.830
3.000
3.700
2.47
4.25
2.52
4.812
2.468
3.005
1.340
0.631
0.837
030
1978
GiiC
C150
350
01/13/81
D038
CT
CS
HT
6.980
5. 160
5.400
2.48
4.33
2.41
5.991
4. 183
4.572
1.669
1.070
1.273
031
1979
GMC
C150
350
01/13/81
D041
CT
CS
HT
5.490
4.060
4.650
2.48
4.28
2.57
4.508
3-335
3.708
1.256
0.853
1.033
032
1978
PEUG
504
141
01/13/81
D036
CT
CS
HT
2.590
0.950
1.450
2.45
4. 32
2.46
2. 144
0.768
1.201
0.597
0.197
0.335
033
1979
GMC
C 150
350
01/13/81
D040
CT
CS
HT
5. 130
3.580
3.430
2.55
4.28
2.53
4. 151
2. 934
2.777
1.156
0.750
0.774
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE // 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
-------
APPENDIX C
LISTING OF FTP PARTICULATE TEST RESJLTS Oti INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
NO.
03^
035
i iODL
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
DATE
TEST
SEGMENTS
I1ILLI
GRAMS
CUBIC
FEET
GRAMS
GRAMS/
MILES
1979
PEUG
504
141
01/13/81
D037
CT
2.250
2.53
1.827
0.509
CS
0.700
4.42
0.555
0. 142
HT
1.180
2.42
0.996
0.278
1980
VOLK
RABB
090
01/13/81
DO 39
CT
2.360
2.54
1.894
0.528
CS
1.200
4.21
1.002
0.256
HT
1.930
2.53
1.559
0.434
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE it 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
c - 4
-------
Supplement, to Appendix C
Overall Federal Test Procedure Results
of Particulate Testing
Vehicle FTP
Number Results (gm/mi)
1 1.511
2 0.680
3 0.660
4 0.190
5 0.454
6 0.491
7 0.652
S 0.647
9 0.429
10 1.293
11 0.727
12 0.855
13 0.266
14 1.312
15 1.192
16 U45L
17 0.318
18 0.369
19 0.372
20 0.755
21 D.852
22 0.287
23 0.911
24 0.563
25 1.454
26 0.549
27 1.016
28 0.655
29 0.867
30 1.275
31 1.000
32 0.334
33 0.866
34 0.270
IS S.3b7
Average
0.739
-------
APPENDIX D - LISTING Or HIGHWAY FUHL ECONOMY
A\'D EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
EMISSION RESULTS
(gm/mi) - Emission results measured in grams per mile
HC - Hydrocarbon emissions in grams per mile
CO - Carbon monoxide emissions in grams per mile
CO2 - Carbon dioxide emissions in grams per mile
NO - Oxides of nitrogen emission corrected for humidity in
grams per mile
FUEL ECON MPG - Fuel economy calculated by the carbon balance method in
miles per gallon
D-j
-------
APPENDIX D
LISTING OF HIGHWAY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
FUEL
VEH. MODL - EMISSION RESULTS (gm/mi)- ECOH
NO. YEAR MAKE MODL CID HC CO C02 NOxc MPG
001
1978
002
1980
003
1978
004
1979
005
1980
006
1980
007
1980
008
1979
009
1980
010
1978
011
1978
012
1978
013
1978
014
1979
015
1980
016
1979
017
1978
018
1979
019
1979
020
1979
021
1980
022
1980
023
1979
024
1979
025
1978
026
1979
027
1979
028
1979
029
1978
030
1978
031
1979
032
1978
033
1979
034
1979
035
1980
GMC C150
CHEV STAW
GMC C150
VOLK RABB
OLDS 88
PONT BONN
CHEV CIO
MERB 2HOD
OLDS 38
IH SCOU
CHEV CIO
OLDS 98
VOLK RABB
OLDS STAW
PONT BONN
GMC C150
HERB 240D
VOLK RABB
PEUG 501
CHEV CIO
CHEV C10
MERB 300D
MERB 240D
VOLK RABB
CHEV C10
MERB 300D
GMC C150
GMC C150
CHEV C10
GMC C150
GMC C150
PEUG 504
GMC C150
PEUG 504
VOLK RABB
350 0.96
350 0.26
350 0.67
090 0.68
350 0.14
350 0.20
350 0.74
146 0.45
350 0.20
198 0.40
350 0.60
350 0.62
090 0.34
350 0.47
350 1.70
350 0.91
147 0.08
090 0.48
141 0.23
350 0.70
350 1.17
183 0.33
146 0.23
090 0.76
350 0.50
183 0.22
350 0.5^
350 1.09
350 1.36
350 0.80
350 0.62
141 0.58
350 1.09
141 0.22
090 0.32
1.6
445.9
0.9
356.1
1.3
423.2
1.1
181.0
0.7
344.3
0.8
329.4
1.2
395. 1
1.6
321.2
0.6
344.7
2.2
424. 1
1.1
400.5
1.3
338.7
1.1
177.4
1.4
394.4
1.6
332.4
1.8
414. 1
0.6
277.7
1.3
181.6
0.7
330.8
1.5
477.0
1.5
430.8
0.7
355.3
1.0
323.1
2.1
191.6
1.4
421.2
1.2
343.4
1.2
429.6
1.4
447. 4
1.8
441. 1
1.6
414.9
1.3
416.2
1.0
348.8
1.5
456. 1
0.5
323.5
1.0
201. 1
1.49 22.54
0.75 28.40
1.25 23.81
0.84 55.05
0.77 29.43
0.71 30.72
1.27 25.49
1.81 31.30
0.78 29.40
1.76 23.73
1.06 25.18
1.05 29.69
0.81 56.47
1.52 25.57
0.54 29.91
1.69 24.24
1.22 36.50
1.02 54.95
0.95 30.60
1.27 21.13
1.27 23.29
1.19 28.47
2.43 31.27
0.96 51.59
1.55 23.95
1.39 29.41
1.42 23.49
1.19 22.46
1.22 22.70
1.70 24.24
1.23 24.21
0.90 28.89
1.35 22.03
1.23 31.31
0.83 49.96
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE it 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
D - 1
-------
APPENDIX E - LISTING OF HFET PARTICULATE TEST
RESULTS OK INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
•MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
DATE - Date of test (month/day/year)
TEST - Contractor Run Number
MILLIGRAMS - Filter weight gain measured in milligrams
CUBIC FEET - Vehicle exhaust volume measured in cubic feet
GRAMS - Particulates, in the vehicle exhaust, calculated in grams
GRAMS/MILE - Particulates calculated to grams per mile
E-
-------
APPENDIX E
LISTING OF HFET PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH.
KO.
N'ODL
YEAS MAKE
¦iDDL CID DATE
973
980
973
979
980
980
980
979
980
978
GMC
CHEV
GMC
VOLK
OLDS
CI 50
ST AW
C350
RABB
88
PONT BONN
CHEV CIO
KERB 240D
OLDS 88
IH SCOU
350
350
350
090
350
350
350
146
350
198
01/06/81
01/09/81
01/07/81
01/06/81
01/07/81
01/07/81
01/07/81
01/07/81
01/07/81
01/13/81
978 CHEV C10 350 01/07/81
978 OLDS 98 350 01/08/81
973 VOLK RABB 090 01/08/81
979 OLDS STAW 350 01/08/81
980 PONT BONN 350 01/08/81
979 GMC C150 350 01/09/81
978 HERB 240D 147 01/12/81
979 VOLK RABB 090 01/08/81
979 PEUG 504 141 01/09/8".
979 CHEV C1D 350 01/09/81
93C- CHEV C10
930 MEfiB 30QD
979 MES3 240D
979
979
979
978
978
97 o
978
979
979
980
ME.R3
GilC
GMC
CHEV
GMC
GMC
PEUG
GMC
PEUG
VOLK
30DD
C1 50
C1 50
C10
C150
CI 50
504
C150
504
RABB
183
350
350
350
350
350
141
350
141
090
350 01/08/81
163 Q1/C9/81
146 01/09/81
?79 VOLK KA33 C
-------
APPENDIX ? - LISTING OF FOUR SPEED IDLE EMISSION
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VSri. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
TYPE - Test speed
IDLE (N) - measured with vehicle in neutral, at normal idle
2500 RPM - measured with vehicle at 2500 RPM (estimated RPM)
IDLE (N) - measured with vehicle in neutral, at normal idle
IDLE (D) - measured with vehicle in drive, at normal idle
HC ppmh - Exhaust hydrocarbon concentration in ppm hexane
CO % - Exhaust carbon monoxide concentration in mole per cent
NO ppm - Exhaust oxides of nitrogen concentration in ppm
F-i
-------
APPENDIX F
LISTING OF FOUR SPEED IDLE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER
DIESELS
VEH.
tiODL
NO.
YEAR
MAKE
I10DL
CID
TYPE
HC ppmh
CO %
NO ppr
001
1978
GMC
C150
350
IDLE
(N)
28
0.05
54
2500
RPM
25
0.03
63
IDLE
(N)
28
0.05
56
IDLE
(D)
36
0.06
89
002
1980
CHEV
STAW
350
IDLE
(N)
12
0.04
41
2500
RPM
13
0.04
28
IDLE
(N)
14
0.04
38
IDLE
(D)
13
0.04
93
003
1978
GI1C
C150
350
IDLE
(N)
14
0.05
33
2500
RPM
12
0.02
©3
IDLE
(N)
17
0.05
35
IDLE
(D)
22
0.06
57
004
1979
VOLK
RA6B
090
IDLE
(N)
43
0.04
85
2500
RPM
V
0.02
121
IDLE
(N)
46
0.04
81
005
1980
OLDS
88
350
IDLE
(N)
9
0.02
63
2500
RPM
8
0.03
45
IDLE
(N)
6
0.02
70
IDLE
(D)
6
0.03
114
006
1980
PONT
BONN
350
IDLE
(N)
9
0.02
63
2500
RPM
12
0.04
29
IDLE
(N)
Q
0.02
75
IDLE
(D)
8
0.03
115
007
1980
CHEV
C10
350
IDLE
(N)
11
0.03
49
2500
RPM
16
0.04
33
IDLE
(N)
14
0.03
50
IDLE
(D)
18
0.05
90
008
1979
MERB
240D
146
IDLE
(N)
20
0.01
133
2500
RPM
27
0.08
181
IDLE
(N)
24
0.01
150
IDLE
(D)
26
0.04
174
009
1980
OLDS
88
350
IDLE
(N)
10
0.02
67
2500
RPM
12
0.02
47
IDLE
(N)
12
0.02
69
IDLE
(D)
12
0.03
124
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS RAOD, SUITE // 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
F - 1
-------
APPENDIX F
LI3IINC OF FOUR SPEED IDLE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
VEH.
NO.
MODL
YEAR
HAKE
K0DL
DENVE R
CID
DIESELS
TYPE
HC ppmh
CO %
NO ppr
010
1978
IH
scou
198
IDLE
(N)
9
0.04
78
2500
RPM
11
0.07
108
IDLE
(It)
10
0.03
83
011
1978
CHEV
C10
350
IDLE
(N)
19
0.06
29
2500
RPM
T8
0.03
33
IDLE
CH)
21
0.05
28
IDLE
(D)
24
0.05
52
012
1978
OLDS
98
350
IDLE
(N)
17
0.05
30
2500
RPM
17
0.03
47
IDLE
(N)
20
0.05
35
IDLE
(D)
2k
0,05
59
013
" 378
TOLK
3A&B
2*0
IDLE
(H)
15
0.05
55
2500
FIRM
12
0.03
75
IDLE
(1)
1?
o.oG
54
314
- 579
OLDS
57A a
350
IDLE
(N)
16
0.01
TC
2500
3 PM
15
0.02
52
IDLE
(H)
18
0.04
77
IDLE
(D)
22
0.05
135
015
1980
PONT
BOM N
350
IDLE
(N)
28
0.07
24
2500
RPM
0.07
19
IDLE
(N)
39
0.06
35
IDLE
(D)
35
0.06
61
016
1979
GHC
C150
350
IDLE
(N)
17
0.05
59
2500
RPM
18
0.03
55
IDLE
(N)
19
0.04
67
IDLE
(D)
21
0.05
85
017
1978
HERB
240D
147
IDLE
(N)
12
0.02
84
2500
RPM
15
0.04
63
IDLE
(N)
12
0.02
81
013
1979
VOLK
RABB
O
CT\
O
IDLE
(N)
27
0.07
64
2500
RPM
24
0.03
112
IDLE
(N)
28
0.06
61
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC .
651 CHAMBERS RAOD, SUITE ft 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
F - 2
-------
N r r
\'EH
WO.
019
020
021
02?
023
024
025
026
027
APPENDIX F
OF FOUR SPEED IDLE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
MQDL
YEAR HAKE MODL CID TYPE HC ppmh CO % HO ppm
1979
PEUG
504
im
IDLE
CM)
18
0.07
43
2500
RPM
16
0.04
43
IDLE
CM)
22
0.06
40
IDLE
CD)
16
0.02
134
1979
CHEV
C10
350
IDLE
CIO
15
0.04
46
2500
RPM
14
0.03
41
IDLE
(N)
16
0.04
42
IDLE
CD)
17
0.05
86
1980
CHEV
C10
350
IDLE
CM)
16
0.05
33
2500
RPM
23
0.06
25
IDLE
CN)
21
0.05
35
IDLE
CD)
24
0.05
69
1 930
HERB
300D
183
IDLE
(N)
12
0.02
74
2500
R?H
12
0.03
42
IDLE
-------
APPENDIX F
LIST I 'JG OF FOUR SPLEi) IDLE EMISSIOIJ RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DEIH'ER DIESELS
VEH. MO DL
NO.
YEAR
MAKE
MODL
CID
TYPE
HC ppmh
CO %
NO ppn
028
1979
GMC
C150
350
IDLE
(N)
14
0.05
30
2500
RPM
30
0.11
16
IDLE
(N)
25
0.06
29
IDLE
(D)
27
0.06
65
029
1978
CHEV
C10
350
IDLE
(N)
22
0.07
26
2500
RPM
21
0.05
34
IDLE
(N)
24
0.06
33
IDLE
(D)
24
0.06
58
030
1978
GMC
C150
350
IDLE
(N)
12
0.03
57
2500
RPM
0.02
56
IDLE
(N)
14
0.03
57
IDLE
-------
APPENDIX G - LISTING OF LOADED TK'O MODE EMISSION
RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
MODL YEAR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement in cubic inches
MODE - Identifies the mode of the Loaded Two Mode Test
30 MPH - Vehicle at 30 miles per hour
IDLE (N) - Vehicle at idle, transmission in neutral
RLHP - Dynamometer load used in test
HC - Exhaust hydrocarbon concentration in ppm hexane
CO - Exhaust carbon monoxide concentration in mole per cent
NO - Exhaust oxides of nitrogen concentrations in ppm
G-i
-------
APPENDIX G
LISTING OF LOADED TrfO MODE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH.
NO.
MQDL
YEAR
HAKE
MODL
CID
MODE
KLHP
HC
ppmh
I
O I
O** 1
1
1
NO
ppm
001
78
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
9.0
26
28
0.04
0.04
147
65
002
80
CHEV
STAW
350
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
9.0
11
14
0.03
0. 03
101
50
003
78
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
9.0
12
16
o. 03
0.04
124
35
004
79
VOLK
RABB
090
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
39
50
0.03
0.04
331
99
005
80
OLDS
88
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
8
8
0.02
0.02
101
68
006
80
PONT
BONN
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
7
7
0.03
0.02
99
76
007
80
CHEV
C10
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
12
11
0.03
0.02
144
57
008
79
HERB
24 OD
146
30 MPH
IDLE (10
9.0
17
19
0.04
0.01
281
147
009
80
OLDS
88
350
30 MPH
IDLE (K)
9.0
Q
10
0.03
0.02
104
87
010
78
IH
SCOU
198
30 MPH
IDLE CM)
9.0
9
10
0.04
0.03
202
83
011
78
CHEV
C10
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
16
22
0.03
0.05
91
28
012
78
OLDS
98
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
22
26
0.03
0.04
111
36
013
78
VOLK
RABB
090
30 MPH
IDLE CM)
9.0
21
25
0.04
0. 04
222
75
014
79
OLDS
STAW
350
30 MPH
IDLE CN)
9.0
20
18
0. 05
0.03
180
94
AUTOIIOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC .
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE $ 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
G - 1
-------
APPENDIX G
LISTING OF LOADED TWO MODE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH. MODL HC CO NO
NO. YEAR HAKE HO DL CID MODE RLHP ppmh % ppm
015
80
PONT
BONN
350
30 MPH
9.0
33
0.05
64
IDLE (N)
37
0.06
35
016
79
GHC
C 150
350
30 MPH
9.0
19
0.04
169
IDLE (N)
18
0.03
64
017
78
MERB
240D
147
30 MPH
9.0
10
0.02
206
IDLE (N)
12
0.02
82
018
79
VOLK
RABB
090
30 MPH
9.0
22
0.05
284
IDLE (N)
24
0.05
93
019
79
PEUG
504
141
30 MPH
9.0
20
0.02
170
IDLE (N)
28
0.06
50
020
79
CHEV
C10
350
30 MPH
9.0
14
0.03
114
IDLE (N)
16
0.04
49
021
80
CHEV
CIO
350
30 MPH
9.0
17
0.04
128
IDLE (N)
20
0.04
37
022
60
MERB
300D
183
30 MPH
9.0
11
0.02
173
IDLE (N)
12
0.02
75
023
79
MERB
240D
146
30 MPH
9.0
9
0.04
321
IDLE CM)
9
0.03
172
024
79
VOLK
RABB
090
30 MPH
9.0
23
0.08
285
IDLE (N)
20
0.05
90
025
78
CHEV
CIO
350
30 MPH
9.0
11
0.04
164
IDLE (N)
10
0.04
66
026
79
MERB
300D
183
30 MPH
9.0
11
0.03
176
IDLE (N)
10
0.02
101
027
79
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
9.0
20
0.04
142
IDLE (N)
24
0.05
36
028
79
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
9.0
18
0.04
109
IDLE (N)
21
0.04
32
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE // 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
G - 2
-------
APPENDIX G
LISTING OF LOADED TtfO tlODE EMISSION RESULTS ON INDIVIDUAL VEHICLES
DENVER DIESELS
VEH.
NO.
MODL
YEAR
HAKE
HODL
CID
MODE
RLHP
HC
ppmh
CO
%
NO
PPm
029 '
7i"~
CHEV
C10
350
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
To
"l9
23
0.04
0.06
96
37
030
78
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
IDLE (N)
9.0
16
14
0.03
0.02
191
59
031
79
GMC
C150
350
30 MPH
IDLE
-------
APPENDIX H - LISTING OF SELECTED VEHICLE INFORMATION
Legend
VEH. NO. - Vehicle number
YR - Model year
MAKE - Vehicle make
MODL - Vehicle model
CID - Engine displacement m cubic inches
ODOMETER - Odometer reading as-received from vehicle owner
A/C - Is vehicle equipped with air conditioning
AP - Is vehicle equipped with air pump
CATALYST - Catalyst identification
None - Vehicle not equipped with catalyst
PB - Lead content of fuel as-received from vehicle owner
N/A - Not applicable
H-i
-------
APPENDIX H
LISTING OF SELECTED VEHICLE INFORMATION
DENVER DIESELS
VEH.
MO.
YR
MAKE
MODL
CID
ODOMETER
A/C
AP
CATALYST
PB
001
78
GMC
C150
350
36458
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
002
80'
CHEV
STAW
350
16153
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
003
78
GMC
CI 50
350
46367
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
004
79
VOLK
RABB
090
27431
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
005
80
OLDS
88
350
9336
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
006
80
PONT
BOMN
350
3922
YES
NO
NONE
H/A
007
80
CHEV
C10
350
809
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
003
79
MERB
240D
146
17377
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
009
80
OLDS
88
350
12567
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
010
78
IH
scou
198
30196
NO
NO
NONE
H/A
on
78
CHEV
C10
350
72699
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
012
78
OLDS
98
350
60786
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
013
78
VOLK
RABB
090
25657
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
014
79
OLDS
STAW
350
21319
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
015
80
PONT
BONN
350
9633
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
016
79
GMC
C150
350
29523
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
017
78
MERB
240D
147
39522
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
018
79
VOLK
RABB
090
23743
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
019
79
PEUG
504
141
24 324
NO
NO
NOME
N/A
020
79
CHEV
C10
350
9178
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
021
80
CHEV
C10
350
21374
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
022
80
MERB
300D
183
7884
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
023
79
MERB
240D
146
17128
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
ozn
72
VOLK
RABB
090
45903
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
025
78
CHEV
C10
350
41763
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
026
79
MERB
300D
183
37820
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
027
79
GMC
C150
350
700
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
028
79
GMC
C150
350
15986
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
029
78
CHEV
CIO
350
37895
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
030
73
GMC
C150
350
4 3605
NO
WO
NONE
N/A
031
79
GMC
C150
350
25830
YES
HO
NONE
N/A
032
78
PEUG
504
141
27128
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
033
79
GMC
C150
350
19978
YES
NO
NONE
N/A
03^
79
PEUG
504
141
21316
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
035
80
VOLK
RABB
090
15493
NO
NO
NONE
N/A
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,INC.
651 CHAMBERS ROAD, SUITE # 200
AURORA, COLORADO 80011
H - 1
-------
APPENDIX J
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
The total particulate emissions in grams for a given test phase are calculated
as follows:
qp L i , , Vmix x (FW A -FWj
Total Particulates = -. A B
GMV
Where: Vmix is the total dilute exhaust volume in cubic feet per test phase
corrected to standard conditions.
GMV is the total particulate system sample volume in cubic feet
per test phase corrected to standard conditons.
FW is the weight of the filter and particulates in grams collected during
the "test phase.
FW js the weight of the filter in grams before the test.
Vmix is calculated as specified m the Federal Register.
GMV is calculated as follows:
nx.„ (MR_ - MR.) x BAR x 530 x MCF
= E 1 im iSKT,.
Where: Sas meter reading in cubic feet at the completion
of tne test phase.
MRj is the dry gas meter reading in cubic feet at the beginning of
the test phase.
BAR is the ambient barometric pressure in inches Hg.
Tq is the temperature of the gas flowing through the dry gas meter
m degrees Fahrenheit.
MCF is the dry gas meter correction factor obtained through laminar
flow element calibration.
The particulate emissions in grams per mile are found per test phase by dividing
the total grams per phase by the standard distance constant. The weighted emission
results are found by applying the standard distance constants and using the weighting
factors and equations given in the Federal Register.
J-i
------- |