VEHICLE TESTING
TO
DETERMINE FEASIBlLITY
OF
EMISSION INSPECTION AT ALTITUDE
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
19900 East Colfax Ave.
Aurora, Colorado, 80011
for the
Environmental Protection Agency
Contract 68-01-01+39
September, 1972
L
-------
EPA-420-R-72-100
VEHICLE TESTING
TO
DETERMINE FEASIBILITY
OF
EMISSION INSPECTION AT ALTITUDE
by
Douglas R. Llljedahl
Harold E. Porter
Automotive Testing LaboratorIes. Inc.
19900 East Colfax Ave.
Aurora, Colorado/ 80011
for the
Environmental Protection Agency
Contract 68-01-OU39
September# 1972
-------
EPA Review Nottee
This report has been reviewer! by the Environmental
Protection Agency and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of the
Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention
of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
I i
-------
ABSTRACT
A laboratory study was conducted on 1968 through 1972 model
vehicles at altitude to evaluate vehicle emission reduction
concepts Investigated and applied at lower elevations.
Since vehicle exhaust hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
emissions are IntrInsIca11y high at higher elevations, It
was suspected that emission reducing strategies might not
prove significantly beneficial at higher elevations.
Furthermore, emission reduction factors by engine mainte-
nance are not defined.
The study quantitatively defined hydrocarbon and carbon
monoxide emission reduction at about 15% and 10% re-
spectively. Oxides of nitrogen emissions remained unchanged.
Direct maintenance cost to achieve this reduction is about
$12.00 per car.
Key mode and idle emission Inspection concepts both proved
to be beneficial In arhipvlnp pml
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
I Conclusions 1
II Recommendations 3
III IntroductI on 5
IV Experimental Design 11
V Test Program Description 15
VI Test Results and Data Analysts 31
VI I Acknowledgements U9
VI 11 References 51
IX Glossary 53
X Appendices 55
v
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
1 Computer Plot of Attrition Curve 18
2 Flow Chart of Registration Data 20
Development
3 Exhaust Emission Data Reported from 25
1975 FTP and Key Mode Operation
U Engine Diagnostic Analysts Report 26
5 Vehicle Test and Maintenance Flow Chart 28
6 Distribution of Test Sample by Make 32
and Model Year
7 1975 FTP Hydrocarbon and Carbon UU
Monoxide Emissions Determined by
HC and CO Rejection Rates
vl I
-------
TABLES
Number Page
1 Distribution of Passenger Cars by Model 21
Year in Colorado as of July, 1972
2 Distribution of 75 Vehicle Sample, by 22
Make and Model Year
3 Key Mode Operation 23
k Maintenance Status of 75 Vehicle 3U
Sample as Received
5 Distribution of Maintenance Costs - 35
75 Vehicles
6 75 Car Sample Emission Data Before 36
and After Maintenance
7 Analysis of 1975 FTP Emission Data 37
8 1975 FTP, and CKMC and IC Correlation 39
9 Relative Ranking of Highest HC 1*0
Emi tting Vehicles
10 Relative Ranking of Highest CO 41
Emi tting VehIcles
11 Mean 1975 FTP Emission Levels at 20, h3
30, and U0| Registration Rates for
CKMC, IC and 1975 FTP
12 Cost Effectiveness by Rejection Rates 1*5
13 Cost Effectiveness Comparison of IC U7
and CKMC Inspection and Rejection
ix
-------
SECTION I
CONCLUSIONS
1. At a nominal cost limitation of $25.00 per car, the
mean dlrect cost expected to be Incurred as a result
of engine maintenance and adjustment Is about $12.00
as Indicated by a sampling of seventy-five 1968
through 1972 model passenger cars.
2. The change in fuel economy measured before and after
maintenance of the seventy-five car sample Is insig-
nificant.
3. Engine maintenance resulted In mean reductions of
exhaust hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide of statis-
tical significance while emissions of oxides of
nitrogen remained unchanged.
i*. With reference to emission inspection, key mode in-
spection exhibits greater correlation with 1975 Fed-
eral exhaust emission test procedures than does in-
spection by idle emission concentration.
5. Passenger car exhaust emissions can be better iden-
tified by key mode emission inspection than by In-
spection of idle emission concentration only.
6. Reduction of exhaust hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide
Is more cost effective by Idle emission inspection
than by key mode inspection at 10, 20, 30, i»0 and
50 percent rejection rates.
1
-------
SECTION I I
RECOMMENDATIONS
This program was designed to evaluate practical solutions
to a complex problem under laboratory conditions. It
was not within the scope of the study to define all of
the variables associated with the problem nor to develop
emission reduction factors under field conditions nor to
develop long term cost effectiveness factors. It Is
recommended/ however that field evaluations be conducted
and long term cost effectiveness be determined.
In consideration of several factors found to exist with
respect to engine adjustment It is suggested that field
evaluation be preceeded by orientation and training
sessions for vehicle maintenance personnel. In the con-
duct of such a program, It Is recommended that the same
concepts of emission Inspection and rejection which were
evaluated In this study be applied.
It is known that vehicle emissions at altitude are In-
trinsically high. With reference to emissions at alti-
tude^. a quantity of new data was developed by this study.
It is recommended that this data be compared with equiv-
alent data developed at lower elevations to further Iden-
tify differences and the Implied potential requirement
for greater emission reductions. Additionally/ data
should be further examined to Identify any significant
trends in. high emissions with respect to parameters such
as engine size, vehicle weight, etc., not investigated
by this study.
Although concepts Investigated by this study are not new,
their significance may not be fully understood nor
appreciated. Field evaluation would serve as a proving
grounds where Information on a more practical level would
be generated. This information will provide additional
Input by which a program of greater magnitude would be
guided. It Is therefore recoironended that a pilot program
be instituted and evaluated prior to the establishment
of a mandatory emission inspection and maintenance program
of any significance.
3
-------
SECTION 11 I
INTRODUCTION
Background
Motor vehicles are recognized as a major source of a?r
pollution In major cities throughout the United States. As
a result/ methods are presently being sought by which
vehicle pollution can be reduced.
Starting within the State of California# laws were enacted
to regulate emissions of certain defined harmful pollutants
from motor vehicles. Subsequent!y, standards for motor
vehicle emissions have become more Inclusive and more
stringent, both as a result of statewide efforts of Cali-
fornia regulatory agencies, and n*>re recently by the nation-
ally directed activities of the U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. As a result of these efforts, new motor
vehicles ha*e been produced In compliance with emission
standards for several years at generally lower emission
tevels for each successive vehicle model year. However, In
an effort to continue to reduce emissions from motor
vehicles, many problems continue to exist.
Although motor vehicles comply with Federal Emission
Standards when manufactured, several factors remain as
obstacles to continued low emission vehicle operation. As
vehicles become older and accumulate mileage, deterioration
In engine component parts and accessories tends to occur
which Is accompanied by corresponding changes In emission
Tevels. These changes are generally in a direction con-
sidered to be undesfreabie. Studies have shown that this
tendency can be reversed through corrective maintenance and
adjustments (Reference 1). These same studies indicate that
emissions are not maintained at manufacturer's standards by
the maintenance to which vehicles are normally and volun-
tarily exposed. Thus, In an effort to minimize the contri-
bution of motor vehicles to undestreable loading of the
atmosphere, It Is considered necessary to Investigate other
methods of maintaining low emission levels. Hence, studies
have been Initiated to Investigate feasibility of mandatory
emission inspection and maintenance (Reference 2).
The State of Colorado Is presently considering the establish-
ment of a mandatory vehicle emission inspection and mainte-
nance program. An Independent contractor was selected to
conduct a feasibility study. Specifications for the study
are detailed and comprehensive, and the Colorado Health
Department expressed a desire to have the study completed
5
-------
in time to review the results prior to the 1973 Colorado
Legislative Session. With a completion date as a main
consideration/ the Health Department decided to proceed with
the study without the Inclusion of an actual testing program.
Following the decision to proceed, reservations concerning
a void In emission data taken at altitude were expressed.
Additionally/ the advisability of using sea-level emission
data to fulfil certain critical requirements of the Colorado
study was questioned. Automotive Testing Laboratories/ Inc.
(ATL) responded by submitting a proposal to conduct vehicle
emission tests at altitude. The proposal was submitted to
Region VIII of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The Regional EPA Office, headquartered in Denver/ Colorado/
and the EPA Office of Air Programs at Ann Arbor/ Michigan
recognized potential deficiencies in the Colorado study and
contracted with Automotive Testing Laboratories/ Inc. to
provide current emission data to supplement the Colorado
Study.
Statement of the Problem
Approximately U percent of the population of the United
States live at elevations of 3000 feet or more above sea-
level. Privately owned passenger cars are similarly distri-
buted throughout the U.S. and about k percent of registered
vehicles are operated at elevations above 3000 feet.
Passenger car registrations in the State of Colorado alone
exceed one million vehicles in 1972. As Is the situation
in cities at or near sea-level In elevations/ population
centers located at higher elevations are exposed to high
levels of air contamination. Studies conducted during the
past several years Indigate motor vehicles to be a major
source of atmospheric contamination in virtually all of the
larger cities of the U.S./ regardless of geographic setting.
Although volumes of data have been collected and analyzed
concerning methods by which motor vehicle emissions can be
controlled/ relatively little data is available with respect
to vehicle emissions at altitude* The Environmental Pro-
tection Agency/ has gathered emission data from vehicles
operating in the Denver Metropolitan Area. In support of
two studies previously conducted (References 3 and k),
recent test results show carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon
emissions to be significantly higher at higher altitude and
emissions of oxides of nitrogen to be lower.
In addition to changes in altitude/ a major factor known to
affect emissions Is the frequency and quality of maintenance
to which a vehicle Is exposed. To a large extent/ mainte-
nance practices are dictated by the environment in which a
vehicle Is required to operate. A marginal electrical
6
-------
system, for example/ Is more likely to receive attention In
a northern climate as cold weather approaches and engine
starting becomes Increasingly more difficult. In turn,
emissions are expected to decrease as poorly operating com-
ponents are properly adjusted and maintained. Thus,
exhaust emissions in the Rocky Mountain Region, or more
specifically, the State of Colorado, are affected not only
by altitude, but are also indirectly influenced by
climatological conditions.
Colorado's feasibility study of vehicle emission Inspection
was precipitated as a result of the poor quality of atmos-
phere over Metropolitan Denver. Previous studies indicate
that emissions from motor vehicles are a major contributor
to Denver's poor atmospheric quality. Furthur, comparative
data Indicates motor vehicle emissions In Denver are greater,
because of the higher elevation, than at lower elevations on
a per mile basis. Because of the unique combination of
elevation, climate, and vehicle maintenance and adjustment
practices resulting from this combination, It Is suspected
that emission Inspection and maintenance concepts proven
elsewhere may not necessarily produce the same results when
applied In Colorado.
Purpose of the Study
The overall purpose of the study Is to provide the Environ-
mental Protection Agency with data to assist local air
pollution regulatory bodies In developing effectual emission
control and abatement programs. With respect to the Rocky
Mountain Region, the State of Colorado Is now evaluating
methods by which emissions from motor vehicles can be con-
trolled. Other mountain states will undoubtedly find it
necessary to do likewise. Before EPA can assist and
recommend programs, certain specific information must be
obtained, which should be Investigated In the environment
In which problems exist. Various concepts of motor vehicle
emission control have been investigated In other areas of
the United States. Many of them have been shown to be too
complex and uneconomical to be applied on a scale broad
enough to have an impact on the environment. In the State
of Colorado, Interest has been expressed In a few concepts
which have been shown to be practical elsewhere. Several of
these concepts are presently under evaluation with respect
to a mandatory motor vehicle emission and inspection and
maintenance program. Therefore, this study is designed to
provide Information relative to:
Effectiveness of engine maintenance and adjustments
as a method of reducing exhaust emissions from motor
vehicles.
7
-------
Establishment of dlrect costs to the motorist
expected to be Incurred as a result of engine mainte-
nance and adjustments.
Evaluation of Key Mode and Idle Inspection pro-
cedures as potential emission identification regimens.
Development of correlations between the Federal
Emission Test Procedure and Key Mode exhaust emission
concentration measurements and Key Mode mass emission
measurements.
Expansion of baseline exhaust emission data developed
at Denver's elevation.
This study then, Is to provide additional information
relative to the effectiveness of emission control concepts
as applied in the Colorado environment.
Scope of the Study
The scope of the study consists essentially of three phases.
They are:
To develop a current compilation of
Colorado Motor Vehicle Registration
data.
To conduct exhaust emission tests and
maintenance on a representative sample
of vehicles.
To compile and analyze test and
maintenance data as generated by testing
and maintenance procedures.
General Specifications of the Study
One of the main considerations In the conduct of an Investl-r
gational study of this nature Is that of sample selection.
In order to develop data which adequately describes a
particular situation It is normally desireable to select a
sample which Is representative of a larger population,
preferably by a method of randomized selection. However,
regardless of the care with which an experiment Is designed,
for one reason or another, some bias Is Inadvertently Intro-
duced Into the experiment.
Another segment of the study which requires special consider-
ation Is that of engine maintenance. To evaluate the
effect of maintenance, vehicles were scheduled for initial
tests In the condition In which they were received.
8
-------
Maintenance was then performed and the vehicles were re-
tested. Some doubt existed as to the basis for determi-
nation of the degree of maintenance and the speclftc areas
In which It was to be performed. After careful consider-
ation/ the decision was made to place a limitation on
maintenance costs for each individual vehicle based on
typical labor rates and retail parts costs. It was furthur
decided that# based on a subjective evaluation, engine
maintenance and adjustments would be performed only In those
areas known to affect emissions. Carburetlon and ignition
malfunctions and misadjustment would receive priority.
Several concepts in vehicle emission Inspection have been
developed and evaluated during the past several years. It
was not the Intent of this study to re-evaluate these
concepts. Previous investigation, as Indicated by the EPA,
show the Clayton Key Mode (Reference 5) to be high on a list
of potential Inspection methods for state programs.
Although emission inspection at engine Idle is a less
deslreable Inspection method, the State of Colorado expres-
sed Interest with regard to Inclusion In Its study as a
potential Inspection regimen. Both of these methods are
Included for evaluation.
Although the study was completed In a relatively short
period of time, a large quantity of new data was developed.
Analysis of the data was performed In those areas considered
to be critical to satisfy certain requirements of the Colo-
rado emission Inspection feasibility study. In the develop-
ment and subsequent presentation of data, care was taken to
assemble and report data in its entirety so as to facilitate
the use of this data by other interested organizations.
9
-------
SECTION IV
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
As the study was Initially conceived, It was logical that
It should be divided into three distinct, but Interacting
phases. This section describes the consideration given to
the development of each phase.
Phase I
The first phase of the study consists of the development of
current Colorado motor vehicle registration data and
selection of a vehicle test sample.
The State of Colorado had included a requirement for pro-
jected motor vehicle registration data in Its feasibility
study specifications. Data was to be developed in order to
establish an emission reduction forecast, as a result of
applied emission reduction concepts. Const deration was
given to the anticipated effort Involved in accurately
predicting motor vehicle registrations and to the detail
which was thought to be ultimately required. At the outset,
it was believed that reasonably good correlation could be
established between the Federal Test Procedure and Key Mode
mass emission data. It was furthur believed that corre-
lation could be established between Key Mode concentration
and mass emission data. Assuming these correlations would
be established, additional emission data could then be
developed by less complex and costly test procedures. The
conclusion was that registration data should be produced
in as much detail as possible so subsequent data could be
expanded to more accurately predict emission Inventories.
This phase of the study was designed in such a manner that
projections could be made more comprehensive at but slight
increase In overall effort.
Prior to initiation of the testing program it was considered
necessary to have at least a segment of the registration
data compiled. The desire was to have current registration
data available for selection of vehicles for emission
sampling. Since 1972 calendar year Passenger Car Regis-
tration Data have not been published. It was necessary to
make projections of 1972 data from data published in
previous years.
There are numerous ways by which a sample can be selected.
Theoretically, a purely random method of sample selection
would have yielded a sample which would have been repre-
sentative of the population and totally satisfied the intent
11
-------
of the study. However/ due to limits of access to the
population, a purely random sample was not feasible. Sub-
jective reactions of vehicle owners who wish to participate
or not to participate tend to bias a sample even if access
were not limited. Owners of a particular vehicle, by make,
or model year, or in some condition of repair, etc. are
enthusiastic or are not enthusiastic about participation.
In the design of this study these factors were considered.
The conclusion finally reached was that compromises in
sample selection would have to be made. Although compro-
mising approaches were carefully considered prior to
adoption, bias in the sample Is known to have been intro-
duced and its effect Is difficult to evaluate.
Phase 11
The second phase of the study was to consist of conducting
exhaust emission tests and maintenance on vehicles selected
In Phase I.
In the process of selecting emission test procedures, it was
considered desireable to choose a procedure which most
accurately determined representative emission levels. As a
secondary consideration, It was desireable to select a
procedure used previously to evaluate vehicle emission
levels In the Denver area (Reference 6). The 1975 Federal
Test Procedure was subsequently chosen as the primary test
procedure since it satisfied both requirements.
Consideration was then given to the selection of less
complex emission inspection 'procedures. The Colorado
feasibility study specifications expressed Interest in two
procedures, the Idle test and the Key Mode Test. EPA,
Region VIII, expressed an interest in the Key Mode pro-
cedure since, of the many short test cycles developed, the
Key Mode procedure appeared to satisfy many of the require-
ments for a short inspection procedure. Key Mode was
subsequently selected as the short test cycle. The Idle
test procedure was also included since data at Idle could
be extracted from the Idle mode of the Key Mode procedure
with little additional effort.
With respect to engt-ne maintenance and adjustment some
uncertainty initially developed as to specifications to
which engines would be adjusted. The uncertainty developed
as a result of purported changes In original factory speci-
fications commonly practiced by local maintenance organ-
izations to improve engine performance at altitude. After
conferring with the EPA Project Officer and in consideration
of restrictions imposed by Federal Regulations (Reference 7),
It was decided that original factory specifications would be
maintained (one exception to be discussed later).
12
-------
There are several approaches which can be taken with respect
to an evaluation of the effect of engine maintenance in
controlling emissions. For example/ a sample could be
dlvtded into sub-sets. One sub-set would receive an idle
adjustment only and another a complete engine tune-up.
Subsequent analysis of data would reveal the Individual
effectiveness of each procedure. This was not the approach
employed by this study, however. First of all, the size of
the sample did not permit division of the sample into sub-
sets. Secondly, the tactic employed here was that of estab-
lishing a maximum emission reduction factor which could be
expected as a result of a rather extensive maintenance and
adjustment program.
Phase 1 11
The third phase of the study consists of the analysis of
data.
In consideration of the fact that very little emission data
is available at Denver's altitude, the program was designed
to accumulate as much new data as practical within economic
restraints of the program. This was accomplished.
In the analysis of data it was thought that primary con-
sideration should be given to those areas that were of
express Interest In the Colorado Study. Upon examination
of the specifications for the Colorado Study, It was con-
cluded that the testing program should be designed primarily
to determine effectiveness and costs of engine tune-up and
the ability of Key Mode and Idle inspection to identify
emissions. Analysis and subsequent presentation of data
were designed to show the results of this determination, and
a comprehensive statistical analysis Is provided.
13
-------
SECTION V
TEST PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Previous sections have described the background and stated
the problems In emission control at higher elevations. A
description of the purpose and scope.of the study were also
presented along with some of the special considerations
Involved In the design of the program. In order that the
results of the study may be better understood, this section
is presented to describe the step by step procedure under-
taken to complete each phase of the program.
Development of Colorado Motor Vehicle Registration Data
Several organizations assemble, process/ and publish auto-
motive statistical data. As a result/ data relative to
vehicle registrations and original equipment sales Is avail-
able In several different forms.
In order to minimize discrepancies which may have been
introduced as a result of variation in the collection and
processing of data, a single prominent source of statistical
data was selected. This source also supplies data to auto-
motive statistical publications. Vehicle registration data
for calendar years 1963, 1965/ 1967/ 1968/ 1969, 1970 and
19^1,,was assembled from copies of automotive publications
or as directly supplied by the statistical firm. Additional
copies of automotive publications were obtained which
contained data relative to automobile sales by model year,
make, body style and original equipment. Original factory
sales data was then extracted for vehicle model years 1955
through 1972 and organized for subsequent analysis.
It was known that the task of predicting motor vehicle
registrations was to be a relatively large one. A large
quantity of data processing was involved. It was decided
that the major part of the data would be processed by
computer. In order to develop a computer program which
would process and project registration data, it was first
necessary to develop preliminary Information. This was
accomplished by manual plotting of data. Plots were com-
pleted on a quantity of registration data by Years in
Service versus Percent Remaining in Service by vehicle make
and model year. After a number of plots were completed, it
was obvious that certain similarities existed In the data.
Furthur examination revealed that each make of vehicle
exhibited distinct failure characteristics. It was subse-
quently concluded that failure characteristics by make
(Chevrolet, Ford, Plymouth, etc.) were sufficiently similar
15
-------
so as to permlt treatment of data by the same method over
several model years.
The next step In the process was that of selecting equations
to which empirical data would best fit.
Examinations of manual plots of published registration data
showed the existence of three distinct characteristics in
data. The first was; in the year in which a vehicle model
was first Introduced, registrations were far below those for
the same model in the subsequent year. The explanation is
that In any given registration year, all new model vehicles
had not been sold as of the final registration date. Regis-
tration years and model years do not coincide. Secondly,
all model vehicles continue to appreciate for several years
after introduction. This appreciation Is probably coinci-
dent with the Influx of population to the state. Thirdly,
upon reaching a peak in registrations, a relatively smooth
depreciation curve begins to develop. In order to establish
reliable predictions of vehicle registrations It was neces-
sary to develop equations for the three segments as just
descr i bed.
The development of an equation for the first segment, that
of a sudden increase in registration data in the first year
after Introduction, was a relatively simple operation. Data
from previous years was examined and a simple factor was
established from which fIrst-year-after-introductIon data
could be predicted. Independent factors were developed for
each make of vehicle.
The.second equation developed was obtained by doing a least
squares fit to empirical data from registration files. An
equation was developed for each vehicle make.
The selection of a third equation which described the
vehicle depreciation curve was completed by a more difficult
procedure. In the development of product lines, manu-
facturers frequently use equations to predict long term
failures based on a short term test. Listed among equations
are Lognormal, Gumbel, Binomial, and Welbull. Of all
equations In these general forms, it was thought that one
of the four would best fit vehicle registration depreci-
ation curves. All equations were tested and it was found
that Welbull distribution best fit the data. This method
was subsequently used to describe the third segment of
registration attrition curves and an equation was estab-
lished to describe each make of vehicle.
16
-------
Figure 1, Computer Plot of Attrition Curve, Is an actual
plot based on registration data from past years and pre-
dicted registrations from future years. The plot shown is
for 1961 model year Plymouths previously registered or
predicted to be registered in Colorado. In the Illustration/
zero (0) Years in Service corresponds to the middle of the
calendar year in which the vehicle was originally sold, in
this case, 1961, and 10 Years In Service corresponds to
mi d-1971.
As previously discussed, it was decided that predicted
registration data should be developed in as much detail as
practical and should include data on 1955 through 1972
vehicle model years since they comprised over 95fc of Colo-
rado passenger car registrations. Specifications for a
catalog of predicted vehicle registrations were established
which contained projections of registrations of 1955 through
1972 models by:
Model Year
Make
Model
Vehicle Weight
Engine Displacement
Transmission Type
Carburetor Type
Vehicles Registered In Colorado as of mid-year
1971
1972
1973
197U
1975
Procedures were then developed to compile and process the
data.
First, the following tables were extracted from automotive
publi cat ions:
1. Model Year Passenger Car Production, by Makes
(manufacturer, make, model, units sold as a percent
of total).
2. Standard Engines - Ratings and Performance
(manufacturer, make, model, engine displacement,
curb weight).
3. Optional Engines - Ratings and Performance
(manufacturer, make, model, engtne displacement,
curb wei ght).
17
-------
0 18 3
4
5
10
15
20
100* -»
R
~
2
E
F
n
~ F
2
A
~ 2
1
90* -~ F
N
~
2
I
~
N
+
G
+
2
80* - +
I
~
N
~
S
~
2
E
70* - +
R
~
V
~
I
+
C
2
E
60* -~
~
~
50* -~
~
~
F
~
~
40* -~
~
*
F
~
30* -~
~
~
F
~
20* -~
~
F
~
10* - +
~
F
~
~
F
~
F
0 1 2 3
4
5
10
IS
20
'
YEARS
IN SERVICE
F
= FIT (PREDICTED)
R
» REGISTRATION
2
= BOTH
YEAR =
1961
Figure 1, Computer Plot of Attrltlon Curve
18
-------
U. Model Year Factory Installation of Selected Equipment
(transmission# automatic, manual 3-speed# manual
(~-speed; engines# V-8# (i cylinder).
5. Exhaust Fuel and Cooling System
(manufacturer# make# model# carburetor type)
A listing was then established and column headings were
assigned. Data was then transferred from the automotive
publication in terms of percent of sales by make, model#
engine# transmission# and carburetion into appropriate
columns. Figure 2# Flow Chart of Registration Data
Development# shows the method by which vehicle registration
data was compiled. Upon completion of the compilation#
computer input tapes were punched# input# and combined with
attrition curves which had been developed for each make and
model year. The Colorado Motor Vehicle Registration Catalog
(Predicted) was then printed.
Based on catalog data# predicted registration of 1955-1972
model passenger cars for Colorado was obtained for years
1972 through 1975.
A summary of 1972 data is shown in Table 1# Distribution of
Passenger Cars by Model Year in Colorado as of July# 1972.
It is interesting to note that more than half of the pas-
senger cars currently registered in Colorado are not as yet
equipped with factory Installed exhaust emission control
systems.
Test Sample Selection
In selecting a sample of vehicles for testing# a purely
randomized selection would be Ideal. However# as mentioned
earlier# this approach was not feasible. A compromlse
approach was then recommended which consisted of randomly
selecting vehicle owners from passenger car registration
files# addressing correspondence to them and requesting
participation. Due to a technicality in Federal laws# this
method proved to be too cumbersome in view of time limita-
tions placed on the program. An alternate approach to
secure vehicles was then developed.
A news release was prepared and submitted to the news-media
which described the program in general and Indicated a
method by which car owners could express their desire to
participate. The release was carefully worded so as to
avoid mention of maintenance to be performed or any Item
thought to possibly Introduce bias beyond that which seems
to be Inherent In public oriented programs. Participation
was encouraged by offering a $25 U.S. Savings Bond to those
19
-------
Figure 2
Flow Chart of Registration Data Development
20
-------
Model Year Number
Regi stered
Percent of Total
1972
EXHAUST
60, 373
5.86
19 71
114,933
11.1*
1970
EMISSION
90, 5*0
**.74
8.80
1969
96,131
9.29
1968
CONTROLLED
99,661
9.68
1967
91,039
8.80
1966
9*,156
9.09
1965
89,1*53
8.70
1964
76,017
7.33
1963
NOT
62,956
6.06
1962
31,768
55.3%
3.03
1961
CONTROLLED
34, 750
3.32
1960
29, 295
2.83
1959
17,7*8
1.76
1958
6,98*
0.68
1957
5,157
0. *9
1956
*,5*3
0. *9
1955
3,69 7
0.39
195U
and earlier
2?,U5
2.?Q
1,
032,552
100.01
Table 1, Distribution of Passenger Cars by Model
Year In Colorado as of July, 1972
(Predlcted)
owners whose vehicles were finally selected for testing. A
negative thought developed with respect to the Savings Bond.
Concern was, the Savings Bond would attract an economic
segment of the population with an immediate need for finan-
cial assistance. However, this was quickly dispelled with
the realization that Bonds were not Immediately convertible,
and considering vehicle model years from which the sample
was to be selected, all potential participants were In
roughly the same economic situation.
The news release produced the desired response. A telephone
number was indicated, by which candidates could express a
desire to participate. Upon receipt of a call from a candi-
date, the desire to participate was first determined, then a
detailed explanation of the program was offered. In all,
268 calls were handled. A comprehensive analysis of vehicle
distribution was not performed on the total sample of
vehicles offered for testing. However, the validity of the
21
-------
sample ts Indicated by the fact that seventy-five of seventy-
five vehicles# by make and model year, originally designated
to fit sample specifications were selected from the group.
Sample Specifications
The study was designed to Investigate emissions from a repre-
sentative sample of seventy-five vehicles from model years
1968 through 1972 (factory equipped exhaust emission control
systems) qpftrat;jng In the Denver Metropolitan area,. Design
considerations included vehicle selection in proportion to
appearance in the population by make and model year. In
some instances it was necessary to combine groups over two
or more model years. Table 2, Distribution of 75 Vehicle
Sample, by Make and Model Year, shows the sample which was
ultimately selected and tested. Upon verification of sample
fit, participating vehicles were scheduled for testing and
maintenance.
Make
No.
of
Vehlcles
by
Model
Year
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
Total
Am.Motors
1
1
2
Bui ck
1
1
1
Cadi 11ac
1
1
Chevrolet
2
3
3
3
3
lk
Chrysler
1
1
2
Dodge
1
1
1
1
U
Ford
2
U
3
3
3
15
Imper1al
0
LIncoln
1
1
Mercury
1
1
1
1
l;
Oldsmobile
1
1
1
k
Plymouth
1
1
2
1
1
6
Pontiac
1
1
2
2
6
Imports
2
3
3
2
2
12
Total
10
15
18
17
15
75
Table 2, Distribution 75 Vehicle Sample by
Make and Model Year
Vehicle Emission Testing
Upon receipt of a test vehicle, an inspection was performed
to determine Incoming condition with respect to dents,
scratches, etc., safety, and Integrity of the exhaust system.
22
-------
After the vehicle was determined to be acceptable, it was
moved into the laboratory to begin the specified 12 hour
temperature soak prior to testing.
The primary emission test by which vehicles were tested were
those specified by 35 Federal Register 219, Part II, Nov-
ember 10, 1970 and as amended in 36 Federal Register 55,
March 10, 1971, the 1975 Federal Test Procedure. Modifi-
cations to the analytical system were not incorporated and
vehicle operation was continued beydmT the 505 seconds of
the hot transient portion of the test for a full 1372
seconds. Key Mode emission tests were then performed.
Key Mode testing consists of vehicle operation at three
conditions described as high cruise, low cruise, and idle.
Table 3, Key Mode Operation, Indicates vehicle speed and
dynamometer loads at which Key Mode tests were conducted by
weight categories of vehicles.
Mode
Vehicle
Vehicle
Dvnamometer
WeUht;
Soeed
Load
(lbs)
(Mph)
(Hp)
High
Over 3800
U9
29
Crut se
2800-3800
U5
23
Under 2800
37
1U
Low
Over 3800
33
11
Crulse
2800-3800
30
9
Under 2800
23
5
Idle
-
-
«¦
Table 3, Key Mode Operation
1975 Federal Exhaust Emission Tests were conducted according
to specified procedures except as noted earlier. Key Mode
emission data was obtained by two methods. By the first
method a small sample of exhaust gas was pumped from the
tailpipe of the vehicle to the analytical system and con-
tinuous traces of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (C02),
hydrocarbon (HC), and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) concentra-
tions were recorded. The sampling period started after
traces stabilized and was continued for a period of two
minutes. Coincident with tailpipe sampling, the constant
volume sampler (CVS) sample circuit was energized and a
dilute sample of exhaust was collected in the sample bag.
23
-------
The second method of obtaining data was to subsequently
analyze the dilute sample bag for CO, COo, HC, and N0X.
Calculations were then performed. Emission data was subse-
quently reported as shown in Figure 3, Exhaust Emission Data
Reported from 1975 FTP and Key Mode Operation. Vehicle
maintenance was completed and the sequence of emission
testing was repeated on the following day.
Engine Diagnosis. Malntenant^ and Adjustment
It was not the Intent or this study to evaluate Idle or Key
Mode inspection as potential diagnostic procedures. Rather,
the primary concern was that of establishing direct costs
expected to be incurred by the vehicle owner as a result of
a fairly extensive Inspection and maintenance procedure.
Therefore, several methods of diagnosing engine malfunction
and maladjustment were initiated.
During Key Mode Operation, engine diagnostic console
(oscilloscope) leads were attached to the engine, and
ignition patterns were observed by the vehicle operator.
Simultaneously, continuous tailpipe exhaust emission traces
were observed by the Instrument operator. Apparent mal-
functions were noted. Upon completion of the first series
of emission tests the vehicle was removed from the dyna-
mometer and other Inspections were performed. Diagnostic
reports from vehicle and instrument operators and diagnos-
tician were combined and a decision was made as to correction
of indicated malfunctions. Observations of ignition oscil-
loscope traces Indicated general ignition system condition.
In some cases, marginal malfunctions, such as wear on the
distributor cam, air/fuel ratio unbalance, low or high spark
plug firing voltages, etc., were Indicated. However, mal-
functions were considered a* requiring attention only if
severe enough to cause Incipient misfire or abnorna 11 y TTi gh
tailpipe emissions as observed on analytical console re-
corders. Subsequently, directinspection of engine parts
either reinforced or weakened conclusions with regard to
suspected malfunctions. Figure k. Engine Diagnostic Analy-
sis Report, Indicates the extent of diagnosis and the areas
in which diagnosis was performed. Labor charges to correct
malfunctions were estimated based on a Flat Rate Manual for
mechanics at a labor rate of $10.00 per hour. Parts costs
were determined from retail prices normally charged by a
local automotive parts supplier.
With respect to specific items, general guidelines were
established and tolerances assigned. In some instances, it
was merely necessary to determine If an item was operational
or not. This was the situation with respect to the .heat
riser and PCV valve, and for air Injected engines, the air
2U
-------
TEST
C«R
M.MPER:
NUPEER:
ECC54
CC12
AFTER
D YN A"OME T 6 R EMISSICK
1975 FECEKAL TEST
RESUTS LSINC
FPCCtCLRES
YFAR "AKE ~'CnFL CYL
1S72 FCC GALAX 8
CIC BPL
*.00 2
CCCP 1N R T
10413 4C0C
R CFP
12.C
MC
Y
EVP E*F
Y A I
FCV TRANS
Y A
GPANS PF1 MILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
fPC
1975 CCPPriSITF
3.28
54 .2?
622 .5
7.25
12.36
SI Ct'LATEC IS72 CCLC
3.63
64.7?
6 44.6
2.2C
11.75
S I PULAT EC 1S 72 HTT
3.C2
46. 3 1
6C7.4
3.2E
12.91
CriD TRANSIENT GRAMS
15.33
2St.lt
2212.7
12.77
-11. S 2
COLD STAe11.1 21T CRA«S
ii.ee
18
-------
I DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS REPORT
CAR NO
•
Function
S
u
Labor
Parts
Air Cleaner
Heat Riser
Carb. Choke
PCV Valve
A1r Pumo
Check Valves
1
Gulo Valve
i
Air Hoses
!
01st. Can
1
Rotor
Condensor
Col 1
Idle Soeed
Soec Act.
Dwel 1
SDee Act.
Tlmlnc
Soec Act.
P1uK Conditlon-ldle
Carb-ldle CO
I '
Plug Cond1t1on-HI«h C.
Carb-Hlih C. CO
Plug Conditlon-Low C. ,
i ;
i
Carb-Low C. CO
i '
Plui Wires
1
¦
Polnts
|
Detonation
j
Blowbv
Valves
1
Figure k, Engine Diagnostic Analysis Report
26
-------
pump, check valves, gulp valve, and air hoses. In other
instances, such as inspection of the air cleaner element, a
subjective evaluation was required. Air cleaner elements
were scheduled for replacement if either oil soaked or if a
moderate tap of the element against a hard surface indicated
the existence of excessive dust. Elements that were merely
discolored were not replaced. Idle rpm was adjusted If more
than 25 rpm out of specifications^ I gn l tlori tlmlng was
changed if more than 2 degrees out, and dwell was adjusted
If out or manufacturers tolerance. The distributor cap was
inspected and replaced |f r.rar.ltpd or if evidence of arcing
was noted. Contact points and distributor rotor were In-
spected and replaced at indication of moderate to severe
pitting or mis-alignment.If point replacement was neces-
sary," new condensers were also installed. When mi s-f I re was
noted during Key Mode operation, spark plugs were removed,
inspected and replaced If elements showed signs of erosion
or if moderate to severe deposits were noted. Spark plugs
were replaced in complete sets where inspection indicated
malfunction of one or more. Plug wires were generally
examined; however, none were found to be defective. Indl-
catlon of blowby, exhaust valve leakage, and detonation was
also evaluated during Key Mode operation. After completion
of diagnosis, and maintenance and Ignition adjustment, a
lean best Idle adjustment was performed (minimum fuel at
Idle for best engine Idling characteristics). ~ "
In the above discussion, carburetor choke adjustments were
not mentioned. Upon receipt of the first few vehicles, It
was noted among other things, t^at choke adjustments (bi-
metallic spring wprp 1 panor fhan sperifted bv the
manufacturer^A casual survey of maintenance organizations
in the Denver area revealed that a common complaint from
vehicle owners was that of engine flooding during attempted
coid weatner starting. Generally, fhp flooding was attri-
buted to choke settings which were too rich for this alti-
tude.As a result. It was falrlv common practice to set
choices leaner than snpr 1 f 1 pH.' Since cold weather startl ng
can be cri tical In the Colorado environment, 11 was deci ded
that choke settings would not be altered unless severely
out of specification.
A similar situation developed with respect to l^nltion
tlmlng. The same dealerships surveyed In regard to choke
settmgs, reported that ignition timing was normally ad-
vanced from factory specified settings bv 3 to 6 degrees.
Since ignition fiminp i«t loss critical with regard to engine
starting and operation, it was decided that factory specifi-
cations tor timing would be maintained. — _
27
-------
Upon completion of engine diagnosis and maintenance/ the
vehicle was positioned in the temperature soak area in
preparation for final emission tests. Figure 5, Vehicle
Test and Maintenance Flow Chart shows the sequence through
which a vehicle was routed from the time it was received
until it was returned to the owner.
Figure 5, Vehicle Test and Maintenance Flow Chart
Qual1tv Assurance
In the design stages of the study/ the obvious requirement
for quality data was recognized. As a result/ a system of
28
-------
equipment check*; wa«; Instituted and maintained at prescribed
regularity throughout the program.
Initially, all test equipment was inspected and determined
to be in good operating condition. txnaust gas analytical"
equipment was calThratea using gas blend concentrations Ts
j dent 11" I ed by EPA tn Its Ann Arbor Laboratory* Anal yt I cal
Instrument calibration curves were determined by the least
squares method. Propane recovery tests and thermal con-
verter efficiency checks were then performed and the chassis
dynamometer was calibrated for speed and load, with load
calibration determined by the coast down technique. Propane
recovery, converter efficiency and dynamometer calibrations
were performed according to the Federal Register referenced
earl Ier.
As testing commenced, propane recovery and thermal converter
efficiency checks were performed on a dally basis. Propane
recovery tolerances were maintained at.plus or minus 2 per-
cent and converter efficiency at 100 percent as nearly as
could be determined. Extensive leak checks were also per-
formed on a daily basis. With regard to individual emission
tests, the tailpipe sample probe was blocked and the
analytic system was leak checked before each test series.
Analytical system calibration checks were performed at
frequent Intervals during individual testing sequences.
Data Reduction and Analysis
Reduction of emission data as reported for the 1975 Federal
Test Procedure was accomplished In accordance with pro-
cedures specified In the Federal Register (Reference 7).
Emission data Is reported for CO, C02, HC, and NOx as
measured from cold transient, cold stabilized, hot transient,
and hot stabilized sample bags. Data from the hot stabi-
lized portion of the test was not used In calculating
emissions as reported for the 1975 Federal Test Procedure.
Emission data is also reported for simulated 1972 Federal
Test Procedures. Simulated 1972 Cold data was obtained
from the sum of individual exhaust gas components In grams
from the cold stabilized and cold transient sample bags
divided by 7.5 (the length of the driving cycle in miles).
Likewise, Simulated 1972 Hot emission data was obtained
from the sum of components in the cold stabilized bag and'
the hot transient bag divided by 7.5. Dynamometer Emission
Results Using 1975 Federal Test Procedures by individual
car are presented in the appendix. 1975 Composite, Simu-
lated 1972 Cold, and Simulated 1972 Hot data are reported
in grams per mile for HC, CO, CO2, and NOx. Fuel economy
(MPG) Is also reported for each test segment and for com-
posite data as computed by a carbon balance method
29
-------
(Reference 8). Data for Cold Transient, Cold Stabilized,
Hot Transient, and Hot Stabilized segments of the test are
reported in total grams for HC, CO, C02, and N0X.
Data from Key Mode Emissions is reported for High Cruise,
Low Cruise, and Idle. Composite Key Mode emissions are also
reported. Composite Key Mode emissions were determined by a
multiple regression analysis of modal data from Key Mode
operation explained In Appendix B, Key Mode Regression
Analysis Equations. Key mode data is shown as concentration
in parts per million (ppm) carbon for HC, ppm for N0X, and
percent for CO and CO2. Mass data for Key Mode analysis Is
shown In grams per mile for High and Low Cruise, and grams
per minute for Idle. Composite mass Key Mode data is shown
i n grams per mi 1e.
After emission tests were completed and data was reduced,
statistical analysis was performed on emission data devel-
oped during the program. Mean, standard deviation, and
range calculations of pertinent data were performed by
individual vehicle through all cars by year, make, and gross
vehicle weight. Correlation factors and estimates of error
were established between 1975 FTP and Idle and Key Mode
emission data. Effectiveness of emission reduction Is
shown by the 1975 FTP, and Idle and Key mode, for CO, HC,
and NO*. Determinations were made of the ability of Key
Mode and Idle inspection to Identify high emitters at 20,
30, and i»0 percent rejection levels for CO, HC and NOx
emissions and direct consumer costs were established for
engine maintenance and adjustment.
30
-------
SECTION VI
TEST RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSIS
This section describes the vehicle sample/ results of
emission tests on sample vehicles in the condition In which
they were received, maintenance performed on the sample,
and emission results obtained as a result of that mainte-
nance. Also presented are repair cost estimates and
statistical analysis of emission data.
Test Sample
Seventy-five 1968 through 1972 model vehicles were selected i
for testing In proportion to appearance In the population '
by make and model year. Distribution of the sample was not
forced beyond make and model year. It was assumed that
additional sample distribution by model, engine, trans-
mission, etc., would occur In a random manner and would
therefore satisfy sample requirements.
Figure 6, Distribution of Test Sample by Make and Model Year
gives indication of the validity of the sample ultimately
tested with respect to the sample required. The first
number in parenthesis indicates the desired sample, (1), the
second number Indicates actual selection, 1. Horizontal
lines indicate model year combinations designated by origi-
nal sample specifications from which vehicle selections
could be made.
A furthur indication of the validity of the sample is shown
by distribution of transmission and engine types. Sales
data published in 1970 (mean sample model year) reports the
distribution of transmission sales during 1970 for passenger
cars at 90 percent of vehicles sold with automatic trans-
missions and 10 percent of vehicles sold with manual trans-
missions, as compared to sample distribution of 87 percent
and 13 percent respectively. Likewise, distribution of
engine types in 1970 was reported for sales of V-8 engines
at 89 percent and 6 and U cylinder engines at 11 percent
compared with sample distribution of 86 percent and 1U per-
cent respectively for American made passenger cars. In .
general, the sample was found to be representative of the
1968 through 1972 model passenger car population.
Maintenance
One of the primary considerations of the study was to deter-
mine the extent of maintenance required to correct engine
malfunction or mis-adjustment In the 75 car sample. Methods
by which malfunctions or mis-adjustments were determined
were described earlier. With respect to mis-adjustment,
31
-------
Make
No.
of
Vehlcles
By Model
Year
1972
1971
19 70
969
1968
Total
Am.Motors
(1) —
(1)
— (1)1
1)1-
-(1)
(2) 2
Buick
(1)1 —
(1)
(1)1
1)1
(1)1
(U) U
Cadi 1 lac
(1) 1—
(1)
--(I) —
1) -
-(1)
(1) 1
Chevrolet
(2)2
(3)3
(3)3
3)3
(3)3
(1U)1U
Chrysler
(1)1 —
(1)
— (1)
1)1-
-(1)
(2) 2
Dodge
(1) ~
(1)1
(1)1
1)1
(1)1
(It) 14
Ford
(2)2
(U)U
(3)3
3)3
(3)3
(15)15
Imperi al
(1) —
(1)
— (1) —
1) -
-(1)
LIncoln
(1) —
(1)
—<1)1—
1) -
-(1)
(1) 1
Mercury
(1) —
(1)1
(1)1
1)1
(1)1
(it) 4
01dsmobl1e
(1) —
(1)1
(1)1
1)1
(1)1
(U) U
PIymouth
(1)1
(1)1
(2)2
1)1
(1)1
(6) 6
Pontlac
(1) —
(1)1
(1)1
2)2
(2)2
(6) 6
imports
(2)2
(3)3
(3)3
2)2
(2)2
(12)12
Total
10
15
18
17
15
(75)75
Figure 6, Distribution of Test Sample by Make and Model Year
tolerances around factory specifications were established
for idle rpm, ignition timing/ and point dwell. Adjustments
were performed if outside tolerances of:
~. 25 rpm for Idle speed
± 2 degrees for Ignition timing
specifications for point dwell
and choke adjustments were performed if:
choke angles (bi-metalllc spring)
were 2 notches lean of specifications
or richer
Go/no-go inspections were performed to determine condition
of:
heat riser
PCV valve
and for air Injected engines:
a i r pump
check valve(s)
32
-------
gu 1 p va 1 ve
air hoses
Subjective evaluations determined the condition of:
the air cleaner element
and instrumentation coupled with subjective analysis
indicated condition of:
distributor rotor
di strIbutor cap
contact points (and condenser)
spark plugs
i gnltion wi res
In addition, dynamometer operation Indicated:
blowby
detonation
All vehicles received lean best idle adjustments.
Table U, Maintenance Status of 75 Vehicl
shows the general condition of vehicles
celved and as determined by diagnosis.
Table U, idle spef* ' g"t «-i r,r, fimln*
frequently trr""* Ka mi*; 'fiflfi
specifications for idle speed and igniti
on Emission Specification Labels affixed
vehicles at the point of manufacture. I
that Incoming status of maintenance and
were determTned singularly, without rega
ments also out of specifications, e.g.,
point dwell.
e Sample As Received,
as they were re-
As indicated by
wI ffmc fpnct
i££S,
Oddly enough,
on timing now appear
to late model
t should be noted
adjustment I terns
rd for other adjust-
1gni tion timi ng and
Of the 75 vehicles diagnosed with regard to I terns 1 through
1U In Table k:
All vehicles required some attention. Furthur:
75
67
U8
26
15
2
(100|)
(89%)
(6i»%)
(35%)
(20%)
(3%)
requlred
requi red
requlred
requlred
requlred
requlred
attention
attent ton
attention
attentI on
attentIon
attention
to
to
to
to
to
to
1
2
3
k
5
6
or
or
or
or
or
or
more
more
more
more
more
more
terns
terns
terns
terns
terns
terns
In addition, one vehicle required major replacement of
emission control parts.
33
-------
1 tem
Status As
Received
Satis
Adi Cleanlne Repl
75 Vehicles
Req
R«?q.
Rea.
1.
Idle Speed
9
66
N/A
N/A
2.
Ignltion Timing
9
66
N/A
N/A
3.
Po i nt Dwel1
36
39
N/A
N/A
i».
Choke Angle
62
13
N/A
N/A
5.
Heat Riser
75
0
0
N/A
6.
PCV Valve
7k
N/A
0
*1
7.
Air Cleaner
Sk
N/A
**2
19
8.
Rotor
7k
N/A
N/A
1
9.
Dist. Cap
75
N/A
N/A
0
10.
Points & Condensor
61
N/A
N/A
lk
11.
Spark Plugs(sets)
63
N/A
N/A
12
12.
1gni tion Wi res
75
N/A
N/A
0
13.
Detonat1 on
75
N/A
N/A
N/A
11*.
Blowby
7U
N/A
N/A
N/A
17 Vehicles
15.
Air Pump
16
N/A
N/A
*1
16.
Check Valve
16
N/A
N/A
*1
17.
Gulp Valve
16
N/A
N/A
*1
18.
Air Hoses
16
N/A
N/A
*1
* Emission Controls
Removed *~
Oil
Bath
Table k, Maintenance Status of 75 Vehicle Sample
As Received
Maintenance Costs
In the determination of maintenance costs, the labor rate was
assumed to be $10.00 per hour (typical local rates are
$10.00 to $12.00 per hour). To fix charges with respect to
labor for engine maintenance, a Mechanics Flat Rate Manual
was referenced and charges were estimated in accordance with
listed flat-rate schedules. Independent estimates were
determined for each vehicle. Estimates do not include labor
incurred for diagnostic procedures. However, It is esti-
mated that diagnosis by direct Inspection was completed in
less than 0.2 hours at a cost (base, $10 per hour) of less
than $2.00 per vehicle. Total costs Incurred In repair and
adjustment for the 75 car sample Is:
Labor $611.00
Parts $272.U5
Total $883. i»5
3U
-------
and the mean cost per vehicle Is:
Labor $ 8.15
Parts $ 3.63
Total $11.78
The initial specifications of the program fixed a nominal
maximum cost to repair each vehicle at $25.00. However/
during actual performance of the maintenance phase of the
study, several vehicles were found to require repairs in
excess of $25.00. With respect to three of these vehicles,
replacement of spark plugs was required in addition to other
maintenance. In referencing the flat rate manual, it was
noted that labor allocated for spark plug replacement
appeared to be unusually high due to interference from an
existing air conditioning compressor or similar item. In
consideration of the general condition of each engine in
question, it was concluded that neither spark plugs nor
other items as a group could be Ignored. Cost estimates
include charges for complete maintenance on the three
vehicles. Table 5, Distribution of Maintenance Costs - 75
Vehicles, shows maintenance cost distribution for the sample
in $5.00 Increments.
Vehicles
Cost Range
Labor
Parts
Total
Mean
(No)
<%>
(Cum?;)
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
1
1
1
40. 00-M.99
24. 00
16.13
40.13
40.13
0
0
1
35.00-39.99
0
0
0
0
3
4
5
30.00-3U.99
56.00
UU.22
100.22
33.40
5
7
12
25.00-29.99
82.00
52.15
134.15
26. 82
5
7
19
20.00-2U.99
59. 00
56.40
115.40
23.08
9
12
31
15.00-19.99
102.00
49.50
151.50
16. 83
9
12
43
10.00-1U.99
70.00
38.70
108.70
12.08
33
44
87
5.00- 9.99
190.00
15.35
205.35
6. 22
10
11
100
0 - U.99
28.00
0
28.00
2.80
75
100
•
611.00
272.45
883.45
11.78
Table 5, Distribution of Maintenance Costs - 75 Vehicles
Fuel Economy
As mentioned earlier, fuel consumption data was calculated
for each segment of the test. Mean miles per gallon (mpg)
as calculated from the 1975 FTP emission data Is:
Before Maintenance 15.19 mpg
After Maintenance 15.27 mpg
35
-------
which represents a mean Increase in fuel mileage of 0.08
miles per gallon. Assuming an annual mileage accumulation
on a per vehicle basis of 12,000 miles and fuel cost at
$0.35 per gallon, fuel costs would decrease from $276.50 per
year to $275. 05 per year or $1.1+5, an insignificant amount.
Emission Reduction
Emission data is reported for the 1975 FTP, Key Mode and
Idle test procedures. Both mass (grams per mile) and con-
centration data is reported for Key Mode procedure. Con-
centration data is reported for the Idle test. The 1975
Federal Test Procedure is considered as the primary standard.
The sample was tested in two phases of the program. „ The
first series of tests was conducted on the vehicles in the
condition In which they were delivered to the laboratory
(before). The second series of tests was conducted after
maintenance and adjustments were performed (after). Table 6,
75 Car Sample Emission Data Before and After Maintenance,
sTiows emission levels measured by each test procedure" afTd
indicated emission reductionr Data reported for Key Mode i s
composite data developed from multiple regression analysis.
Mass emissions are indicated in grams per mile (g/m) for CO,
HC, and NOx. Emissions by concentration (cone) are in mole
percent (%) for CO, and parts per million (ppm) for HC and
N0X. HC ppm is in terms of parts per million carbon as
measured by a flame-ionization detector.
Test Procedure
1975 FTP (Mass)
Key Mode (Mass)
Key Mode (Cone)
Idle (Cone)
1975 FTP (Mass)
Key Mode (Mass)
Key Mode (Cone)
Idle (Cone)
1975 FTP (Mass)
Key Mode (Mass)
Key Mode (Cone)
Idle (Cone)
Mean Emission Levels
fHy")Before
Reduct ion
5.70g/m -
1.78g/m
34 74 ppm
5493r»pm
CO Before
71.79g/m -
22.16g/m
1.92%
3,51%
NOxBefore
3.07g/m
2.24g/m
770ppm
9 7 ppm
HC After
* 4.82g/m
1. 51 g/m
3048ppm
3788ppm
co After
63.68g/m
19.81g/m
1. 74%
2. 28%
N0xAfter
3.03g/m
2.16g/m
766ppm
131ppm
Absolute
0.88g/m
0.27g/m
426ppm
1705ppm
8.lOg/m
2.35g/m
0.18%
1.23%
0.04g/m
0.08g/m
I* ppm
-34ppm
Percent
15.44
15.17
12.30
31.04
11.28
10.60
9.40
35.04
1.30
3.57
0.05
-35.05
Table 6, 75 Car Emission Data Before and After Maintenance
36
-------
Analyses of Emission Data
Test data Is presented in detail in the appendix to the
study. A statistical analysis was performed relative to
emission data on tests before maintenance and on tests after
maintenance. Table 7, Analysis of 1975 FTP Emission Data,
shows the results of that analysis. Acceptance limits were
established at 99 percent for T-tests. On this basis, HC
and CO emissions showed significant Improvement after mainte-
nance. N0X remained unchanged. Appendix D shows a similar
analysis of Key Mode Mass data, Key Mode Concentration data
and Idle Concentration data. T-tests were not performed on
Key Mode Mass, Key Mode Concentration and Idle Concentration
data since 1975 FTP data Is considered the standard.
Analysts
Mean
Standard Deviation
Maximum
Mi nimum
Range
Computed T Value
Analysis
Mean
Standard Deviation
Maximum
Mini mum
Range
Computed T Value
Analysis
Mean
Standard Deviation
Maximum
Mi nimum
Range
Computed T Value
HC Before
(g/m)
5.70
3.88
30.lt
1.59
28.55
HC After
IsZml
li.82
2.39
17.02
1.33
15.69
-2.33
CO Before
(fi/m)
71.79
33.56
19U.2U
22.1*7
171.77
CO After
(g/m)
63.68
30.99
197.00
19.08
177.91
-3.67
N0X Pqfqre
IsZml
3.07
1.09
6.60
1.23
5.37
NOy After
U/nr)
3.03
1.00
5.50
1.U2
*». 09
-0.U2
Improvement
LsZml All
0.88 15.U0
Improvement
laZml (*>
8.10 11.30
Improvement
SMml All
0.01* 1.30
For a decrease (single-ended test), t0>gg ° -2.326
given d.f =oo (Reference 9)
Table 7, Analysis of 1975 FTP Emission Data
37
-------
At this point It should be noted that the decrease In CO
emission for the sample was not accompanied by an increase
in NOx emission as would normally be expected. A change in
ignition timing is known to have significant effects on
emissions of N0X. It is believed that N0X emissions did not
significantly change partially due to this phenomenon.
Maintenance organizations reported the practice of advancing
ignition timing from specifications. In consideration of
the potential significance of reported practices, engine
data was examined and mean basic timing was found to be
advanced 2.3 degrees from specifications. All vehicles were
set to specifications prior to re-testing, or In effect were
retarded a mean 2.3 degrees. Retarded Ignition timing is
known to reduce emissions of N0X.
Good agreement (see Appendix D) is indicated between 1975
FTP data, Key Mode Mass data, and Key Mode Concentration
data In terms of indicating improvement in emissions. In
making this comparison, however, it should be remembered
that composite Key Mode mass and concentration data were
established by a best fit multiple regression analysis to
1975 FTP data. As furthur indicated by the above referenced
tables, emission reduction predicted by Idle concentration
data relative to 1975 FTP results is relatively poor.
Identification of High Emitters. Inspection Correlations
One of the primary purposes of the study is to establish
correlations between the 1975 Federal Test Procedure and Key
Mode and Idle inspection. Perhaps of equal Importance Is to
determine the relative effectiveness of Key Mode and Idle
inspection In Identifying high emitters. it can be assumed
that the better the correlation between 1975 FTP and an
inspection procedure, the greater the ability of the In-
spection procedure to identify emissions at any level.
With respect to Key Mode data, two different regression
analyses were performed for HC, CO and N0X for both CKMC and
CKMM. While details are given In Appendix B, the first
regression analysis provided a least-squares fit of 1975 FTP
data to the three modes of the Key Mode test. This analysis
resulted in constants by which each mode was multiplied to
obtain a Composite value for the Key Mode.
The actual Composite Key Mode values were computed using
these constants. These composite values were then compared
with 1975 FTP data using a second regression analysis. The
results of this second analysis are presented In Table 8,
1975 FTP, and CKMC and IC Correlation. Although several
correlations were determined and presented In the appendix,
only CKMC and IC are presented here.
38
-------
Analvsls
Values
CKMC
IC
HC
CO
NOv
HC
CO
NO*
1ntercept
-0.325
29.25U
0.768
3.058
47.249
2.770
Regression
Coeff i c1ent
0.002
21.050
0.003
0.000
7.068
0.002
Std Error
of Reg Qoef
0. 000
1.566
0.000
0.000
0.966
0.009
Computed
T-Value
20. (*80
13.445
15.531
11.520
7.320
2.657
Correlation
CoeffIclent
0. 860
0.742
0.787
0.6 88
0.516
0.213
Std Error
of Estimate
1.661
21.846
0. 6U5
2.362
27.900
1.022
Table 8, 1975 FTP, and CKMC and IC Correlation
The correlation coefficient Is a statistical measurement
which is computed from the correlations between pairs of
values. For 1 to 1 correlation (that is# where each value
of x predicts exactly the measured value of y, and that
value of y predicts exactly the measured value of x), the
value of the correlation coefficient equals one (R=1.000).
If a value of x predicts a strange value of y and that value
of y predicts a value of x which is radically different than
the original x, then the value of the correlation coef-
ficient would be close to zero (e.g. R=0.010). Correlation
coefficients of less than 0.700 are often considered to be
poor, with values nearer 1.00 considered to be better.
Emission data from all tests, both before and after mainte-
nance were combined to determine correlations. Based on the
analysts presented in Table 8, it can be seen that greater
correlation exists between 1975 FTP and CKMC emissions for
HC, CO and NOx than between 1975 FTP and IC emissions. It
can therefore be assumed that the ability of Composite Key
Mode Concentration data to Identify high emitters Is greater
than that of Idle Concentration. With emission data
generated by this study, this assumption can be tested.
In order to empirically evaluate the ability of CKMC and IC
to Identify high HC and CO emissions, 1975 FTP results were
sorted and Identified by car number. Sorting was accom-
plished for both HC and CO from highest to lowest emissions.
39
-------
From Table 9, Relative Ranking of Highest HC Emitting
Vehicles# the effectiveness of CKMC and IC in identifying
high HC emissions can be evaluated. Similarly/ relative
ability to identify highest CO emitting vehicles can be
evaluated from Table 10. Ranking is from high to low as
determined independently for HC and CO emissions as measured
by the 1975 FTP.
1975 FTP
CKMC
IC
Ranki ne CarNo
HC(e/m)
Ranki ne
HC(DDmC)
Ranki ne
HC(DDmC)
1
72
30.14
1
14,079
2
29,965
2
51
16. 52
2
9,255
8
23, 638
1 5
*71
15.56
8
8, 009
5
22,595
5%^4
6
12.13
7
7,350
1
17,589
5
*68
12.02
5
7, 206
7
17,206
6
* 8
9.21
10
5, 690
6
13,903
1 7
*11
8.95
3
5,493
X
11,331
10%—8
53
8. 28
6
5,462
X
10,775
9
32
7.97
X
4,456
10
10,775
10
73
7.92
X
4,430
X
9,036
11
*42
7.63
X
4,147
15
8, 863
12
49
6. 74
14
4,114
X
8,689
13
59
6. 74
X
3,997
X
7, 820
1 1»»
*63
6.66
12
3,973
3
7,681
201—15
18
6.54
X
3,954
4
7,646
* vehicles In
hi ghest
20$ CO also
x Indicates greater than 15 in
ranking
Table 9, Relative Ranking of Highest HC Emitting Vehicles
With reference to the ability of CKMC and IC to identify
high emitters; for the highest emitters of HC at 20%
rejection:
CKMC Identified 10 of 15 vehicles by HC
IC Identified 10 of 15 vehicles by HC
for the highest emitters of HC at 10% rejection:
CKMC Identified 7 of 8 vehicles by HC
IC Identified 6 of 8 vehicles by HC
for the highest emitters of HC at 5% rejection:
40
-------
CKMC identified 2 of it vehicles by HC
IC Identified 2 of it vehicles by HC
It should be noted that the correlation coefficient for IC
versus 1975 FTP is relatively high for identification of HC
emissions by Idle Concentration HC Inspection. It would
therefore be expected that emission identification by this
procedure would be reasonably good.
1975 FTP
CKMC
IC
Ranklne CarNo
CO(g/m)
Rank!n*
CO(moU)
Ranklne
COtmoU)
1
*71
194. 2
3
5.5«t
U
8.U7
2
* 8
167.5
1
4.97
X
8.U7
1 3
67
m. o
X
4.61*
X
8.lt7
5% U
58
125.9
X
It.63
8
8.lt7
5
*«t2
121.U
7
It. 60
2
8.37
6
20
119.8
1U
It.37
X
7.39
1 7
*63
110.3
2
3.90
X
7.13
QO
O
H
*68
109. 8
13
3.38
X
7.07
9
10
106.4
k
3.18
3
6. 79
10
12
105.2
X
3.18
X
6. kl
11
75
103.6
9
3.13
10
6. ^1
12
37
103.0
6
2.88
X
6.30
13
1
102. 2
X
2.81
It
6.07
1 l«i
*11
100.7
8
2.79
9
5.93
20% 15
26
95.2
X
2.75
X
5.68
* vehicles in highest 20% HC also
x Indicates greater than 15 in ranking
Table 10, Relative Ranking of Highest CO Emitting Vehicles
For the highest emitters of CO at 20% rejection:
CKMC Identified 10 of 15 vehicles by CO
IC Identified 7 of 15 vehicles by CO
for the highest emitters of CO at 10% rejection:
CKMC Identified i» of 8 vehicles by CO
IC Identified 2 of 8 vehicles by CO
for the highest emitters of CO at 5% rejection:
itl
-------
CKMC Identified 2 of k vehicles by CO
IC identified 0 of U vehicles by CO
The correlation coefficient Is considerably lower for IC
identification of CO emissions by CO inspection than for a
similar Identification by CKMC inspection. This Is
evidenced by the observation just described.
High HC emissions do not necessarily coincide with high CO
emissions. However, six vehicles appear In the highest 20%
by both HC and CO sorting. With reference to the appearance
of the six vehicles In the highest 20% for both HC and CO
ranked groups:
CKMC Identified the same 5 of 6 vehicles common to
both groups, but failed to identify one as being in
either group.
IC Identified the same 3 of 6 vehicles common to both
groups, but failed to Identify 3 by HC Inspection and
2 by CO Inspection as being In either group.
Therefore, based on correlation coefficient, the assumption
that CKMC Inspection has greater ability to Identify high
emitting vehicles than IC, is supported.
Emission Reduction bv Rejection Rates
Rejection rates were established at 20, 30, and 40$ levels
for HC and CO from tests conducted before maintenance.
Rejection rates were established for Composite Key Mode
Concentration (CKMC) and Idle Concentration (IC) testing.
Mean emission levels for the total sample were then
determined for each rejection rate using 1975 FTP data as
the standard measure. Reductions were computed assuming
vehicles rejected were subjected to maintenance and
remaining vehicles were not. Table 11, Mean 1975 FTP
Emission Levels at 20, 30, and i»0% Rejection Rates for
CKMC, IC and 1975 FTP indicates emission levels by each
procedure.
From data shown in Table 11, maximum reduction achieved for
HC emissions Is by 1975 FTP at the k0% HC rejection level.
Idle Concentration (IC) appears to be next most effective
at a 40% HC rejection rate.
With regard to CO, maximum reduction was achieved by IC at
a k0% rejection rate, followed by the 1975 FTP at the k0%
CO rejection rate.
42
-------
BasI s
Mean Emissions bv
1975 FTP
HC(*/m>
C0(n/m)
1975 FTP (Before)
5.70
71.79
3.07
CKMC 20% HC Rejection
5.17
69.89
3.04
CKMC 30% HC Rejection
5.02
68.46
3.04
CKMC 40% HC Rejection
4.99
68.37
3.00
1975 FTP (Before)
5. 70
71.79
3.07
CKMC 20% CO Rejection
5.46
69.30
3.08
CKMC 30% CO Rejection
5.46
67.87
3.10
CKMC 40% CO Rejection
5.35
66.71
3.07
1975 FTP (Before)
5.70
71.79
3.07
IC 20% HC Rejection
5.01*
69.42
3.05
IC 30% HC Rejection
14.96
67.16
3.04
IC 1)0% HC Rejection
4.92
66.00
3.02
1975 FTP (Before)
5. 70
71.79
3.07
IC 20% CO Rejection
5.44
66.92
3.04
IC 30% CO Rejection
5.28
64.89
3.01
IC 40% CO Rejection
4.88
64.48
2<99
1975 FTP (Before)
5.70
71.79
3.07
'75 FTP 20% HC Rejection
4.99
69.09
3.07
•75 FTP 30% HC Rejection
4.89
67.54
3.05
'75 FTP «*0% HC Rejection
4.86
67.47
3.04
1975 FTP (Before)
5.70
71.79
3.07
•75 FTP 20% CO Rejection
5.46
67.25
3.08
•75 FTP 30% CO Rejection
5.35
65.61
3.13
•75 FTP 40% CO Rejection
4.94
64.88
3.11
Table 11, Mean 1975 FTP Emission Levels at
20, 30 and 40% Rejection Rates for CKMC, IC
and 1975 FTP
Figure 7, 1975 FTP Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide Levels
Determined by HC and CO Rejection Rates, is a plot of data
presented in Table 11. Figure 7 furthur illustrates that
inspection by Idle Concentration is the more effective
method of inspection in achieving reductions of both CO
and HC.
It should be pointed out that emission reduction by emission
Inspection is a concept and not a means to achieve emisston
reduction In Itself. Further, discussion relative to
emisston reduction by inspection Is not Intended to imply
43
-------
CKMC
o
--x X
IC
—r-
1975 FTP
-r-
X.
o
-X
20% 30% i»0%
20% 30% U0%
REJECTION RATES
¦HC as determined by CO rejection
¦HC as determined by HC rejection
CKMC
IC
20% 30% U0%
20% 30% i»0%
REJECTION RATES
o-C0 as determined by CO rejection
x*C0 as determined by HC rejection
20% 30% U0%
HC EMISSIONS
1975 FTP
1 1 1
liJ
w • X
S oK
S- XT
< -
en
o
i * i
i i i
W
- O X
I /
•O X
1 i »
K O -
J 1.
// ¦
» i i
72
70
68
66
6V
20% 30% U0%
CO EMISSIONS
Figure 7, 1975 FTP Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide
Emissions Determined by HC and CO Rejection Rates
-------
that an effective Inspection procedure Is an effective
diagnostic procedure. It should be remembered that engine
diagnosis was accomplished by relatively extensive efforts*
The inspection concept Is intended to serve only as a
means of rejecting high emitting vehicles and to Indicate
a requirement for corrective maintenance.
Cost Effect 1vpness
Cost effectiveness data is determined solely on the basis of
reductions in grams per mile for HC and CO and direct
maintenance cost. Costs of Inspection equipment and
diagnosis are not considered. Cost effectiveness is
determined by the equation:
CE«vehI cl e fraction relected X total reduction for fraction
total costs for fraction
Cost effectiveness as determined from the equation was
plotted for Composite Key Mode Concentration inspection
by HC and CO rejection. Plots are shown In Appendix C.
Table 12/ Cost Effectiveness by Rejection Rates was de-
rived from the plots and shows cost effectiveness at 10/
20/ 30/ 40 and 50% rejection rates.
flelectl on
Cost Effectiveness
bv Relectlon Basts
Rate(£)
CKMC
IC
HC Rel
ectlon CO Relectlon HC Relectlon
CO Rel
ectlon
HC
_££_ HC _£2_
HC
CO
HC
_£2_
10
0.028
0.11 0.010 0.12
0.042
0.12
0.016
0.26
20
0.042
0.19 0.018 0.24
0.052
0.22
0.032
0.46
30
0.050
0.26 0.027 0.36
0.058
0.33
0.0U8
0.56
40
0.056
0.32 0.036 0.47
0.062
0.42
0.063
0.65
50
0.061
0.39 0.045 0.60
0.065
0.49
0.074
0.71
Table 12/ Cost Effectiveness by Rejection Rates
From Table 12/ it can be seen:
Inspection by CKMC and rejection by HC Is more cost
effective In reducing HC than inspection by CKMC and
rejection by CO.
Inspection by CKMC and rejection by CO is more cost
effective in reducing CO than inspection by CKMC and
rejection by HC.
-------
Inspection by IC and rejection by HC Is more cost
effective In reducing HC than Inspection by IC and
rejection by CO.
Inspection by IC and rejection by CO Is more cost
effective In reducing CO than inspection by IC and
rejection by HC.
Further:
Inspection by IC and rejection by HC Is more cost
effective In reducing HC than inspection by CKMC
and rejection by HC.
Inspection by IC and rejection by CO is more cost
effective In reducing CO than Inspection by CKMC
and rejection by CO.
Therefore:
Inspection by IC Is more cost effective.
The conclusion that Inspection by IC is more cost effective
than inspection by CKMC is based on the assumption that the
emission reducing tactic to be employed is rejection of both
HC and CO at equal rates. To more clearly demonstrate cost
effectiveness differences which may be expected between IC
and CKMC Inspection and rejection, the following Is
presented:
At# say, a 20% rejection rate, IC by HC rejection
is more cost effective In reducing HC than CKMC by
a factor of 1.2i»
At a 20% rejection rate, IC by CO rejection Is more
cost effective In reducing HC than CKMC by a factor
of 1.78
At a 20% rejection rate, IC by HC rejection Is more
cost effective In reducing CO than CKMC by a factor
of 1.16
At a 20% rejection rate, IC by CO rejection Is more
cost effective In reducing CO than CKMC by a factor
of 1.92
-------
Rejection Rate
ComDarlson Factors
- CE IC/CE CKMC
<*)
HC Refection
CO Reiection
HC _£Q_
_ii£_
10
1.50 1.09
1.60 2.17
20
1.21* 1.16
1.78 1.92
30
1.16 1.27
1.78 1.56
i»0
1.11 1.32
1.75 1.38
50
1.07 1.26
1.6I» 1.18
Table 13, Cost Effectiveness Comparison of IC and
CKMC Inspection and Rejection
Table 13, Cost Effectiveness Comparison of IC and CKMC
Inspection and Rejection, shows the relative cost effective-
ness benefit of IC inspection over CKMC inspection.
47
-------
SECTION VI I I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mr. D. Douglas Graham of Spltzer Electrical Co. Is
acknowledged for hts valuable assistance.
Clayton Manufacturing Company is acknowledged with
respect for Its efforts in the design of the key mode
cycle.
The support of the program by the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Region VIII is acknowledged. A sincere
thanks is especially directed to Mr. Dale Wells, Project
Director, for his diligent efforts and valuable assis-
tance.
A very special acknowledgement and thanks to the members
of the staff of Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
for the expert and efficient manner In which they performed
their assignments. Thanks to Mr. W.J. Becktel, Jr., Mr.
A.J. Fugleberg, Mr. S.W. Sargent, and Ms. G.A. Cunningham.
UQ
-------
SECTION VI I I
REFERENCES
1. Roensch, M.M., "Exhaust Emission Control - Maintenance
vs. Inspection,11 APCA Paper, (June 27, 1968).
2. Northop Corporation, in association with Olson
Laboratories, Inc., "Mandatory Vehicle Emission In-
spection and Maintenance," State of California,
Air Resources Board, Contract ARB1522 (December 10,
1971).
3. McMichael, W.F., and Rose, A.H., Jr., "A Comparison
of Automotive Emissions in Cities at Low and High
Altitudes," Air Pollution Control Association, An-
nual Meeting, Toronto, Canada (December 10, 1971).
it. Domke, Charles J., and Rose, A.H., Jr., "Exhaust
Emissions from Vehicles Equipped with Production
Exhaust Control Devices," AlChE Annual Meeting, Los
Angeles, California (December, 1968).
5. Cllne, E.L., and Tinkham, L., "A Realistic Vehicle
Emission Inspection System," Clayton Manufacturing
Company, El Monte, California, APCA Paper 68-152.
6. Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc., "Study of
Emissions from Light Duty Vehicles In Six Cities,"
EPA Contract No. 68-0U-00U2 (unpublished as of this
date).
7. Federal Register, "Control of Air Pollution from
New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines,"
Volume 35, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 10,1970).
8. Wiers, Ward W., and Scheffler, Charles E., "Carbon
Dioxide (C02) Tracer Technique for Modal Mass Exhaust
Emission Measurement," SAE Paper 720126 (January
10-lif, 1972).
9. Dixon, Wilfrid J., and Massey, Frank J., Jr.,
Introduction to Statistical Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book
Co., Inc., New York (1957).
51
-------
SECTION IX
GLOSSARY
Propane Recovery - A method of checking the constant
volume sampler system whereby a known quantity of propane
Is released Into the system and compared with the quan-
tity of propane recovered In the sample bag.
Thermal Converter Efficiency - A method to determine
the rate of conversion of NO to N0X in the thermal con-
verter of a chemllumlnescent NOx analyzer.
Coast Down Technique - A method to determine frlctional
power losses in a chassis dynamometer whereby actual
loading can be more accurately calibrated.
53
-------
APPENDICES
55
-------
SECTION X
APPENDICES
A Test Equi pment
B Key Mode Regression Analysis and Scattergrams
of Emission Inspection Correlations
Tables 1 thru 12: Scattergrams, 1975 FTP
vs CKMC, CKMM, IC, IM
for HC/ CO, N0X
Tables 13 thru 2
-------
Page-
Table 3: Cars in Operation In 197U 286
Table •»: Cars In Operation In 1975 287
Detailed Registration Data. 288
5*s
-------
APPENDIX A
TEST EQUIPMENT
Test results for the study were based on Inferences from
electronic and mechanical test equipment and instrumentation.
The overall accuracy of the study is therefore limited by
design, quality and calibration of test equipment. In the
design of this study, the Federal Register was considered
to be the standard by which testing techniques and quality
and accuracy of instrumentation were established. In order
that test results may be clearly understood, the following
list of equipment used In the conduct of the study is
provided.
Test Equipment
Clayton Chassis Dynamometer, Model CT-200, with variable
Inertia flywheel assembly and low torque bridge and power
meter
Marquette Engine Diagnosis Console, Model M-200
Automotive Environmental Systems, Inc. Constant Volume
Sampler
Beckman Instruments, Model 315A, Carbon Monoxide and Carbon
Dloxtde Analyzers
Beckman Instruments, Model t»00, Hydrocarbon Flame-
lonization Detector
Thermo-Electron, Chemllumlnescent NO, NO* Analyzer
Texas Instruments, Inc., Servo-Riter II Strip Chart
Recorders
Calibration Gas Standards analyzed by the Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs
59
-------
APPENDIX B
KEY MODE REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND SCATTERGRAMS
OF EMISSION INSPECTION CORRELATIONS
The Key Mode test as run for this program resulted In
six values each for emissions of HC, CO and NOx:
1. High Cruise Concentration
3. Low Cruise Concentration
5. Idle Concentration
2. High Cruise Mass (gm/mi)
Low Cruise Mass (gm/mi)
6. Idle Mass (gm/min)
It was apparent that these results should be combined to
comprise two composite results from the Key Mode...one for
concentration and one for mass. We elected to perform a
multiple regression analysis upon the data to determine a
least-squares best fit for emission results from the 1975
Federal Test Procedure. The following results were
obtained:
CONCENTRATION
Hydrocarbons
Composite » -0.30931 ~ 0.00121 (HI. Cr.)
~ 0.00018 (Lo. Cr.) ~ 0.00031 (Idle)
Carbon Monoxide
Composite = 28.8 ~ 13.02 (Hi. Cr.) ~ 2.1U (Lo. Cr.)
~ i».58 (Idle)
Oxides Of Nitrogen
Composite = 0.752 ~ 0.00055 (HI. Cr.)
~ 0.00081 (Lo. Cr.) ~ 0.00158 (Idle)
MASS
Hydrocarbons
Composite » 1.2U7. ~ 0.657 (Hi. Cr.) + 0.217 (Lo. Cr.)
+ 1.567 (Idle)
Carbon Monoxide
Composite = 23.7 ~ 0.527 (HI. Cr.) + 0.230 (Lo. Cr.)
~ 1. 31*2 (Idle)
61
-------
Oxides of N1trogen
Composite » 0.789 ~ 0.235 (HI. Cr.) + 0.173 (Lo. Cr.)
+ 0.623 (Idle)
We derived a great deal of satisfaction when by these
operations/ the following correlation coefficients were
obta i ned:
We felt that the composites obtained by this method were
difficult to visualize for two reasons: 1.) The concen-
tration data has values which look like mass data/ and
2.) The mass data has multipliers and constants which
result In numbers that don't look like "averages."
We elected to change the factors of the equations such
that the sum of the multipliers would be 1.000 This
would result in composite concentration values that look
like concentrations and both sets of data would look more
like "averages." The resulting equations:
CONCENTRATION
Hydrocarbons
Composite = 0.712 (HI. Cr.) + 0.106 (Lo. Cr.)
CONCENTRATION
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxi des of Ni trogen
R = 0.860
R = 0.71+3
R = 0.788
MASS
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Ni trogen
R = 0.891
R » 0.815
R = 0.824
~ 0.182 (Idle)
Carbon Monoxide
Composite = 0.659 (Hi. Cr.) + 0.109 (Lo. Cr.)
~ 0.232 (Idle)
Oxi des of Ni trogen
Composite = 0.187 (Hi. Cr.) + 0. 276 (Lo. Cr.)
~ 0.537 (Idle)
62
-------
MASS
Hydrocarbons
Composite ¦ 0.269 (HI. Cr.) ~ 0.089 (Lo. Cr.)
+ 0.6U2 (Idle)
Carbon Monoxide
Composite = 0.251 (HI. Cr.) ~ 0.110 (Lo. Cr.)
+ 0.639 (Idle)
Oxides of Nitrogen
Composite s 0.228 (HI. Cr.) * 0.169 (Lo. Cr.)
~ 0.603 (Idle)
were used to compute the composite figures in the program.
Thus, the value presented for hydrocarbon CKMC is the value
computed by the first equation following the word CONCENTRA-
TION In the above set, and the oxides of nitrogen value for
CKMM Is found using the last equation presented Immediately
above.
The following pages of this appendix present scattergrams
of emission data measured by two different methods. The
Intent of this work Is to present data in a format such
that the reader can visually Inspect relationships
existing between emission test results.
For the data in which one axis Is 1975 EPA Test Procedure,
a "line of best fIt" has been shown, and mathematical
information concerning that line Is included on the scat-
tergram. This line represents 1975 EPA Test Procedure
values which would be predicted from the other variable.
The equation represented by the line Is one of the fol-
low! ng faml1y:
'75 EPA Value a Intercept ~ Reg. Coef. X (Value of
other variable)
Statistical Information concerning the Standard Errror
of an Estimate, the Standard Error of the Regression
Coefficient, a computed value for T (with 7** Degrees of
Freedom) and the Correlation Coefficient Is also
presented.
63
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
0.I5E+4
0.00E+4
INTERCEPT
REG RESSI ON"COEFFICT2HTVY-.
-0.325. .
"0V00171
STD. ERROR OF REG. COEF.
COMPUTED T-VALUE.V•
>. 0•00008
."V 20.430
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT....
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIHSTE".
*
24.0
1
32.0
0 . 860
1V66
t
40.0
• + >
f
48.0
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." ~ '
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table 1, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMC for HC
6U
-------
pptf
60E+4-
jf~\M E*4-
i
0
N
C
E3.20E+4-
N "
T
R
A
T2.80E+4-
1
0
N
2.40E+4-
2.00E+4-
I.60E+4-
I.20E*4-
0.80E+4-
0.40E+4-
0.00E+4-
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
»
0.0
~
8.0
INTERCEPT.
3.058
regressiotrrDEnrfTJTWf.v.".".-.-; 0700047
STD. ERROR OF* REG. COEF .0.00034
COMPUTED T-VALUE. V. . . . .V.VWV 1 1V52
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT 0.688
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTItfATEVVV 2V362
»
16.0
»
24.0
»
32.0
t
40.0
t
48.0
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDl DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X*
IS PRINTED."' ' " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC.
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA/ COLORADO 80011
Table 2, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IC for^HC"^)
65
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
15.0-
13.5-
12.0-
10.5-
INTERCEPT.
REG RESS10N"'C02FrcCTENr."7YYVVV
1.247.
2Y44I
STD. ERROR OF REG. COEF 0.102
COMPUTED T-VALUEV.WW 23V92
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
STANDARD" ERROR OF ESTIMATEVW
0.391
IV 47 5
»'
32.0
r
40.0
-+
•y
48.
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN"NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN
IS PRINTED. ~ " "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 830T1
Table 3, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMM for HC
66
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
10.0-t
I
0
L
E
9.0-
M
A
S
S
8.0-
7.0-
6.0-
5.0-
4.0-
3.0-
2.0-
1.0-
0.0-
INTERCEPT 3.354
REGRESSION" "C0EFFrCTENT7777777 2717 6
STD. ERROR OP REG. COEF• •••« .0*162
COMPUTED T-VALUE.7.....V.YV7Y 137446
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT 0.7.42
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMHTE777 27183
t
0.0
t
8.0
t
1-6.0
t
24.0
»
32.0
«
40.0
t
48.0
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDi DIGITS SHOVN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." * *
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES» INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table i», Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IM for HC
67
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
6.00-
5.40-
4.80-
4. 20'
3.60-
3.00-
2.40-
1.80-
1.20-
0.60-
0.00-
INTERCEPT 29.254
REG RESSI ON" "CDEynCTSNT.'VVVVVV 21V0 50
STD. c,RROR OF HEG« CO EF. ..•• .1.566
COMPUTED T-VALUE.V.....7.YYY7 137445
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT 0.742
STANDARD ERROR"OF'ESTIMftTEVYV 2IV35
50
t.
100
' f
150
t'
200
t
2S0
-~>
't
300
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT# AN 'X'
IS PRINTED."
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES# INC.
19900 E. COLFAX# AURORA# COLORADO 600T1
Table 5, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMC for CO
68
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
10.0-
9.0-
8.0-
7.0-
6.0-
S.0-
4.0-
3.0-
2.0-
1.0-
0.fl-
at 2
I I
> /»
11
11
1 11
INTERCEPT•••••••••••••••••• *
REG RES SI ON" TOEFFXriSNT;.V.;v;.j
STD. ERROR OF REG. COEF. ...
COMPUTED T-VALUE.V...;.V.7V\
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT......
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMHTEVVV
47.25
7V068
0.966
7 V 3 23
0.516
27V90
50
t
1 50
t
200
T
250
t
300
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X*
IS PRINTED. " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 80011
Table 6, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IC for CO
69
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
C
0
M
P
0
s
1
T
E
K
E
Y
M
0
D
E
M
A
S
S
INTERCEPT 23.72
reg ress i o;j""cosrFrcTEMTVv:-;vr: 2V39 s
STD. ERR03 OF REG. COEF .0»A23
CuMPUTEb T-VALlfi:.- 17-39
CORRELATION COEFFICIEMT . 0.815
STANDARD ERROR "OF ESTIMATE"."."." I3V88
i ¦»"" ~ f---
150 200 250
¦ + >
300
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN *X'
IS PRINTED." " "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC...
19900 E. COLFAX*"AURORA* COLORADO 800TI
Table 7, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMM for CO
70
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
INTERCEPT
REG RESSI OH" "C0EITTCTE!1TYY7V7YV
STD. ERROR OF REG. COEF
COMPUTED T-VALUE.V.....7.77YV
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMATEVVV'
44.49
1V998
0.204
97831
0.627
257 35 "
»
200
» "
250
t
300
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEQENDi DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." " "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 80011
Table 8, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IM for CO
71
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
C ~ ../ I
e. + » y i i
N1.25E+3-+ 1 ./ . . 1 .
T + I ../.111
R +" L I /. .1
A ~ 1 . . 11 .2/ 11 .
T. + U 1 1/. . I 1
I1.00E+3-+ .1 I •..../ 1 1.1
0 + .1 Mil/-. . 1.1
N + . I .1 Ll42L 11 .
+ i . .i . y\ t i i i
~ .11 .122 .L 1
0.75E+3-+ . 1 2 .1/. 11 .
+ L 3 .lAl2 I
+ . 1 .1 /ll. 11 1
~' 1.31 . .323/.. 1 .1
+ 1 . 11. / 1 3.1
0.50E+3-+ . 1 126 .2 . 211
" ' 1 X I 1
+ .3 /U 11
+ .13/1.1
~ l/l
0.25E+3-<-' /
0.03E+3-+----+-^---+--
f \f "" ' ' 1 f *~'t" » t
0.00 1.2a ,2.40 3.60 4.80 6.00 7.20
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." " ~
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19903 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 830T1
Table 9, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMC for NOx
72
-------
OXIDES or NITROGEN ALL TESTS
EMISSIONS BY 197 5 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDt DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'Xa
IS PRINTED. - -
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 80011
Table 10, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IC for NOx
73
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
C
0
M
P
0
s
1
T
E
K
E
?
M
0
0
E
M
A
S
S
» » t t t i
0.00 1.20 2.40 3.60 4.80 6.00 7.20
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X*
IS PRINTED. "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC., .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table 11, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs CKMM for NOx
7U
-------
X
0
L
E
M
A
S
S
1.50-
1.35-
1.20'
1.05-
0.90-
0.75-
0.60-
0.45-
0.30-
0.15-
0.00-
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
INTERCEPT a.90S
REG RES SI ON'"COEFFICIENT"." .1Y493
STD. ERROR OF REG. COEF. .... 0.797
COMPUTED T-VALUE.V V.VYYV 1YB73
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT 0.152
STANDARD ERROR OF ESTIMHTEWV i"."034
II
2 18 .
a . .1.1
mi.. ism
. .31111421522
111221 13 2 121
11/1
I
1 1 I
21 1
11 222 .11.
22 2 1 .11111
32233211 2
112 11
11
-«•>
t' '
0.00
1.20
"»
2.40
' l
3.60
t
4.80
... f...
6.00
»
7.20
EMISSIONS BY 1975 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." " "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA/ COLORADO 800T1
Table 12, Scattergram, 1975 FTP vs IM for NO*
75
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
1.50E+4-
c
0
M
P.
01.35E+4-
S "
1
T
E.
1.20E+4-
K
E
Y
M1.05E+4-
0
D
E
O0.90E+4-
0
N
C
E
N0.75E+4-
T
R
A
T
I0.60E+4-
0
N
0.45E+4-
0.30E+4-
0.15E+4-
0.00E+4-
1
.1
311
. 211
.1 634
. 11322 2
1. 52742
12437322
13214311
1432
1414
2321 . 2
1 . .1
22 11
. .1
11
1 .
0.3
...f....
5.0
f
10.0
• - • i •
15.0
t
20.0
»" '
25.0
30.0
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT/ AN 'X'.
IS PRINTED." ...
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA/ COLORADO 830'fl
Table 13
Scattergram, Simulated Hot, 1972 FTP vs CKMC for HC
76
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
4.00E+4'
I "
0
L
E
3.60E+4-
C *
0
N
C
E3.20E+4'
N
T
R
A
T2.80E+4'
1 "
0
N
8.40E+4-
2.00E+4-
1.60E+4-
1.20E+4-
0.80E+4-
0.40E+4-
0.00E+
221
1
I
t II
24 t
2 122 21
11152343
236618511
2264X331
1322424 2
2 1
1 1
0.0
t
S.0
i
10.0
t
15.0
t
20.0
»
25.0
t
30.0
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X'
IS PRINTED. " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 80011
Table 1U
Scattergram, Simulated Hot# 1972 FTP vs IC for HC
77
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
15.0-
13.5-
12.0-
10.5-
9.0-
7.5-
6.0-
4.5-
3.0-
1.5-
11
1
1
.. 1
...L 31
111431..
3488311
349731
2874211
..22673431
1152 1
2
11
¦+>
0.0
-"f
5.0
l
10.0
»
15.0
r "
20.0
.... t_..
25.0
y
30.0
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDl DIGITS SHOUN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." ~ "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table 15
Scattergram, Simulated Hot# 1972 FTP vs CKMM for HC
78
-------
HYDROCARBONS At-L TESTS
II
11 1
. I .2
1 11
11324
4I4X51 . .
11 .278734 1 1 I
214179341
64311
»
0.0
r
5.0
t
la.a
t
15.0
T
20 >0
t
25.0
30
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND* DIGITS SKO'JN ON GRAPH HEPRESEN7 THE NUUBETt OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ASE COINCIDENT, AN •*'
15 PRINTED." - -
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING tABORATORlESj INC.
I«900 E. COLFAX.. AtmOHA, COLORADO 8001' 1
Table 16
Scatt^fgram, Simulated Hot# 1S72 FTP vs 1M for HC
79
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
5.40-
4.80-
4.20-
3.60-
3.00-
2.40-
1.80-
1.20-
0.60-
0.00-
I 1
.1
11
II
1
. i ..i a i
1 l H2 i. . .
I 11.. u 1 i
1 . 21 1
I I.
11 . 1 .1 . 11 LI 1.1
1..1U 1 1
11.
. 1
1 .
. 1
I
12..
1
12
U 2 . .112 .
3 .1. . 1.1 . 1
. .HI 1 1 21 . .
1 LIL 2 . 11
.111 .1. 1 . .
1 111.11 11
3 1 1
12
1
1
' f
120
V
150
0 30 60 90
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." " ~
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table 17
Sea ttergram, Simulated Hot, 1972 FTP vs CKMC for CO
80
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
10.0-
9.0-
8.0-
7.0-
6.0-
5.0-
4.0-
3.0-
2.0-
1.0-
0.0'
2 111 1
1
1
2
1 1
2
1
II 1
1
I
11
1
111
1 1
11 II
11 21 I
1 II
11 21 31
1 11 11
1 I
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
I 111
12 1 2
211 I
II 1 1 1 1
21 .121 I I
11311211 1 1
¦+-1--+1——+-I-
» i'""
30 60
2 1
I 1
90
t ""
120
t
I 50
'»
180
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED. ' " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC.
19900 E. COLFAX# AURORA. COLORADO 80011
Table 18
Scattergram, Simulated Hot/ 1972 FTP vs IC for CO
81
-------
100-
90-
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
80-
70-
60-
50-
40.
30-
20-
10-
00-
1..
..I
1
2
2
1JL
1..
.. —I
1 ..II
2 .1 3 1
1... 1 2.
..113 1
22.
.12 JL .l . .
.. 2 1 3.11 1 . 1
1 2 ..'11. 1.2..
12 .12 .1 1
.121 11122 I
1..82311111
.111111
111
2
.+1—+ + +
r~ f
30 60
1 1
1
1.. !..
12 . 1
1 .
1 .1
2 1
1
1.1 1 ..
11 1
21 1
12
90
_»
120
t
150
-+>
"i
160
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
" DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT^; AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." " " ~ "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIESj INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA/ COLORADO 800T1
Table 19
Scattergram, Simulated Hot, 1972 FTP vs CKMM for CO
82
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
60.0-t
54.0-
48.0-
42.0-
36.0-
30.0-
24.0-
18.0-
12.0-
6.0-
0.0-
11
1 .
2 1
1
1
11
1
I
I . . I .
11 .11
1 .1 .
1 . I .1. . . 11
. .1 . 11 11 1
1111 1
.1 .1
11.1 .12
.1 .111 2 . 1
.11 11.1. . 1
1 .111111
1 11.3 1
2 .2 U 21
111 2 1
1.2.1. 11
13 .1 I .1 . 2
23212221 1 1 1 11 1
1UI-1---1+ + H
» » t »
0 30 60 90
"t
120
t
150
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." - - .
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES^ INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA# COLORADO 800T1
Table 20
Scattergram, Simulated Hot/ 1972 FTP vs IM for CO
83
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
2.50E+3-
C "
0
M
P
02.25E+3-
S "
1
T
E
2.00E+3-
K
E
Y
75E+3-
MI.
0 "
0
E
CI.53E+3-
0
N
C
E.
M1.25E+3-
T " *
R
A
T.
I1.00E+3
0
N
0.75E+3-
0.50E+3-
0.25E+3-
0.00E+
1
U1
.1
112
. I '
1 ¦
1 '
.2
12 3
I.! . .
. 1 L.I
I : .1.1
123 2 U .
1 •
i'
. i ¦.
i '. -i
.311
1
I. .2 2
11 .2112 . .
2 . 1 . . 11 :
3 1. 211 1. .
.12. U
143L- 1 .1
1
2. . .1
. 1 • 1.1 1211.
1' .1 U
. .3 13 U
.111 1.1
1 • 1 < 1
.2
12
.1
1 :
1
I I
I
11 <
II
1 !
I'
1 '
' "« ; i •» i » r »-
0.00 1.20 2.40 3.60 4.80 6.00 7.20
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND; DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." " "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, IMC. .
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 800T1
Table 21
Scattergram, Simulated Hot, 1972 FTP vs CKMC for N0X
8U
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
1.00E+3-
I
0
L
E
0.90E+3-
C "
0
N
C
EB.80E+3-
N
T •
R
A
T0.70E+3-
1 "
0
N
0.60E+3-
0.50E+3-
0.40E+3-
0.30E+3-
0.20E+3-
0.I0E+3-
0.00E+3-
0
00
I
1
2
1
I
II
11
1
> 1
> 1
11
I 1111 IT II
1 1 11 1
I 111 1321 11 II
3 12 11 11111 112
112 22 32 I 3 21 1 3 11
. 211123 14231 11 .2 21 I
1 11212 12 1 11
1 1
--~4 + —+
» » » » "
1.20 2.40 3.60 4.80
1
1
11
t
6.00
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDl DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 800T1
Table 22
Scattergram, Simulated Hot# 1972 FTP vs IC for NOx
85
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
C
0
M
P
0
s
1
T
E
K
E
?
M
0
0
E
M
A
S
s
~00-»
• ••+
+
~
+
• 40-V
.
+
+
+
.80-+
* "+
+
+"
+'
.20-+
.. ..4
+
+
+
.60-+
"'+
+
~
~
.00-+
..
~
~
~
.40-+
..
+
*•
*
.80-+
+
~
+
.20-+
..
~
~
V
• 60-+
+
+
+
.00-+—
" "f
0.00
1
1 2
.. 8
1 1
7.3'..
21 1
2"
1
.. i
JL .1
II 1
1 ....
JLL.
.. 1111.
I S 12 I
121 1 1
......' I
..111
I
1
L
..
1 LI 1 I .
_.l .1 Jl 1
11...I 11..
2 1113 1211
222 1 22..
2.. 21 1 1
21 22
21 11 1
4 1 '
.... 1 I
a .. . i
i i i .
11 21
1
.1
1..
1
11
1..
1
..t
1.20
2.40 3.60
~"f
4.80
r
6.00
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT; AN 'X1
IS PRINTED. " " "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC...
19900 £. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 800T1
Table 23
Scattergram, Simulated Hot, 1972 FTP vs CKMM for NO*
86
-------
OXIDES OF NltROGEN ALL TESTS
I
D
L
E
M
A
S
s
1.50
1.35-
1.20-
1.05-
0.90-
0.75-
0. 60'
0.45-
0.30-
0.15-
0.00-
2 11
2 . Ill 1 . .
.111.3 113
.22 13 2121111. 3
..122.24 144211 3331 223 13
1121112 14111 3 1111 1
1
2 .
. 12 .
21 111
U 121
1
1 1
1
-~>
f
0.00
.t
1.20
»
2.40
»
3.60
t
4.80
»
6.00
t
7.20
HOT START EMISSIONS BY SIMULATED 1972 EPA PROCEDURE
LEGENDS DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT# AN •X*
IS PRINTED." . . -
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES# INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX# AURORA# COLORADO 830T1
Table 2k
Scattergram, Simulated Hot# 1972 FTP vs IM for NOx
87
-------
HYDROCARBONS ALL TESTS
1.50E+4-
C "
0
M
P .
01.35E+4-
S "
1
T
E .
1.20E+4-
K
E
Y
M1.05E+4-
o •
D
E
G0.90E+4-
0 "
N
C
E
N0.7 5E+4-
T
R
A
T
10.60E+4-
0 "
N
0.45E+4-
0.30E+4-
0.1SE+4-
0.00E+4-
I
1 1
I
. I
2 21 . .
I 1 .11
1 2325.1 1
1 .13411
2 13591 .
24247411
42244
22411
. 2242 .
1.2231 1
1 1
2 31
1
2
' t'
0.0
t
2.0
T'
4.0
6.0
» "
8.0
»
10.0
...
12.0
COMPOSITE KEY MODE MASS
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." ~ "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLORADO 800TI
Table 25, Scattergram, CKMC vs CKMM for HC
88
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE ALL TESTS
6.00-1
5.40-
4.80-
4.20-
3.60-
3.00-
2.40-
1.80-
1.20-
0.60-
0.00-
1
1
1
21
1 1
111
1
3 2
1 2 2
221. L . . 1
.2 I 1 U 1
.1 11 . 1 .
I . .1 . .1
1 .1 2113 11
2 111
3 21 2
211 1 3 1
.1 11822 1
311. 1.11
. . 2121
11. 2 31
12 11
11
1
1 I
1 1
1 1
1
0.0
. *"
12.0
" »' "
24.0
t
36.0
t
48.0
f "
60.0
»
72.0
COMPOSITE KEY MODE MASS
LEGEND:
DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X*
IS PRINTED."' ...
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES# INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA# COLORADO 800T1
Table 26, Scattergram, CKMC vs CKMM for CO
89
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN ALL TESTS
2.S0E+3-
C
0
M
P
02.25E+3-
S "
1
T
E
2.00E+3-
K "
E
Y
Ml •75E+3-
0 "
D
E
C1.50E+3-
0 "
N
C
E .
N1 . 25E+3-
T
R
A
T .
II.00E+3-
0 *"
N
0.75E+3-
0.50E+3-
0.25E+3-
0.00E+3-
I
. I
111
1 12 2
2 3 1.
1 11111
I .12 212 1 1
14 1 1
... 1221. 12
11 I 111..
21 13111 .
1 2 2 1 . 11.
LI 11 11.224 1 I
1.12 .1.1.1 .
1121 11.11 12
... ai. i . .
11 211 .1 1 1
2 1 11
1 2
11
.. .1
11
a.
11 2
0.00
" f
1 .20
f
2.40
t
3.60
t"
4.80
t
6.00
COMPOSITE KEY MODE MASS
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." " "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES; INC., .
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA, COLORADO 8031" 1
Table 27, Scattergram, CKMC vs CKMM for NO*
90
-------
APPENDIX C
MAINTENANCE AND COST DATA
Appendix C contains detailed data on maintenance required
and costs incurred. It should be noted that maintenance
charges were determined on the basts of actual maintenance
performed as opposed to Indicated maintenance required.
Rather subtle differences exist with respect to the two
bases. For example; one vehicle was received with idle
speed out of specifications/ another with idle speed within
specifications. With reference to the vehicle out of
specif I cat Ions, labor was charged to adjust that vehicle
to lean best Idle. With reference to the second vehicle/
labor was charged for idle adjustment only if it was
determined that the engine/ although idling at the proper
speed/ was not set at a lean best air/fuel mixture. A
similar situation exists with respect to ignition timing
and point dwell. If adjustment of point dwell caused
ignition timing to come into specifications/ a charge to set
ignition timing was not Incurred.
irflfrpr Estimates
To establish labor hours for engine repair and adjustment/ a
flat rate manual was referenced. Allowable labor as listed
in the manual is shown by Individual repair and by combi-
nation of repairs where/ for repair of the same Items/
combined repair charges are less than the total of Indi-
vidual repair charges. In estimating costs by Individual
vehicle/ the combined or lower costs are used. To establish
cost estimates for parts/ a retail parts catalog furntshed
by a local supplier was referenced.
To facilitate presentation of maintenance data, codes have
been assigned and are used in tables which follow. Toler-
ances were established around manufacturers specifications
and are:
Idle speed
Ignition timing
Igni tion dwel1
Choke angle
± 25 rpm
~, 2 degrees
spec!fications
2 notches lean of
specifications
Maintenance Codes
In Sample Maintenance and Costs tables, idle speed is shown
as plus (+) or minus (-). Plus indicates that idle speed
for the engine as it was received was higher than specifi-
cations and minus indicates a speed lower then specifi-
cations. The Numerals following (+) or (-) indicate the
91
-------
number of rpm higher or lower than specifications. A blank
space Indicates the vehicle was received with idle speed in
specifications (within +, 25 rpm).
Ignition timing on engines as they were received is indi-
cated In a like manner. Plus (+) indicates basic engine
timing was advanced from specifications and minus (-)
indicates It was retarded as received. The numeral indi-
cates the number of degrees advanced or retarded. A blank
Indicates engine timing was within specifications (+ 2
degrees).
Ignition point dwell is similarly reported. Plus ( + )
indicates dwell greater than specifications and minus (-)
Is less than specifications. The numeral Indicates the
number of degrees outside specifications. it should be
noted here that dwell time (degrees) Is not always specified
as having tolerances; 28 to 32 degrees and 30 degrees.
Dwell is reported as -2 for a dwell of 26 degrees in
the former and -U for a dwell of 26 degrees in the latter
example.
With regard to the discussion of choke angles presented
earlier in this report/ choke angles are considered to be
rich (R) as received If set richer than 2 notches lean of
specifications. A choke was considered as being lean (L)
If It failed to supply the fuel necessary to cold start the
vehicle for the before maintenance test within a reasonable
length of time (normally 20 seconds). Choke angles were
considered rich (R) If richer than the above noted specifi-
cations and lean (L) If It failed to supply sufficient fuel
for cold starting as just described.
Heat risers and PCV valves were considered as satisfactory
If functional (all parts were free and operating), and
unsatisfactory if binding or locked. An X in the tables
indicates the part was removed or disconnected from the
engine. The same is true for the air pump# check valve#
gulp valve and connecting air Injection hoses# where
existent. An X opposite blowby indicates that blowby was
observed during Key Mode operation. Detonation was not
apparent from any vehicle.
With regard to remaining I terns (air cleaner# rotor# cap#
contact points# spark plugs# and ignition wires)# a blank
indicates the Item was found to be satisfactory# a one (1)
Indicates cleaning was required# and a two (2) Indicates
replacement was required.
All items found to require adjustment# cleaning# or replace-
ment as Indicated In Sample Maintenance and Costs tables
92
-------
were attended to; exceptions are designated by X for Car
No. 51. On this vehicle# the PCV valve was connected;
however, other items (the air injection system) had been
removed and were not available to be re-installed.
Additional Maintenance Required
Seventy-five vehicles were tested# received maintenance# and
were re-tested. Diagnosis Indicated that extensive repair
(in excess of nominal $25.00 limitation) was required on
three (3) vehicles# two (2) in the area of carburetion and
one (1) Including not only carburetion# but also replacement
of air Injection emission controls which had been removed.
Vehicles requiring additional maintenance are indicated
adjacent to ADD'L WORK REQ'D by an estimate of additional
cost necessary to place vehicle In "normal" operating
condltlon.
93
-------
CAR WD:
1
1
5
5
6
7
I
9
10
LL
IDLE SPEED
IGNITION TIMING
fGKITIGN DWELL
CHOKE ANGLE
-2 5
*2
R
-175
+l*
R
+50
+6
-6
-110
+ 3
~160
+a
-255
-3
-2
-110
+3
-2
R
+ 100
+12
-70
+3
-2
-60
*k
-3
-U»0
-fc
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
AIR PUMP
CHECH VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
AIR CLEANER
2
2
2
2
i
2
2
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POtNTS
SPARK PLUGS
IGNITION WIRES
2
2
2
2
BLQWSY
DETONATION
AOD'L WORK REQ'D
LABOR, ACTUAL
PARTS, ACTUAL
TOTAL, ACTUAL
7.00
5,83
12.13
19.00
15.55
5*.55
13.00
3.96
22,96
13.00
3.96
22.96
10.00
io. aa
10.00
€.63
lb. 53
9.00
9.06
71.00
6.00
6.00
8.00
$.00
18.00
10. SO
18.80
6.00
6.&0
Table 1A, Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO:
12
13
lk
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IDLE SPEED
+ 300
-«*0
-125 -125
-195
-50
~ 60
-50
-55
IGNITION TIMING
~ 8
+21
~ 3
*k
~ 3 +3
-2
+ 3
~ 3
-6
IGNITION DWELL
-10
~ 3
+ 1
-2 +8
-3
~ l*
-2
CHOKE ANGLE
R
R
R
L
L
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
l£>
CTI
AIR CLEANER
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS
SPARK PLUGS
IGNITION WIRES
BLOWBY
DETONATION
ADD 1L WORK REQ'D
LABOR# ACTUAL
PARTS, ACTUAL
TOTAL# ACTUAL
5.00 19.00
8.52
7.00 11.00
5.38 5.83
5.00 27.52 12.38 16.83
8.00 10.00 10.00 20.00
6.63 5.33 12.56
8.00 16.63 15.33 32.56
5. 00 7.00 7.00
U.73
5.00 11. 73 7.00
Table IB, Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO: 23 2k 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
IDLE SPEED -120 -30 -75 -30 +30 +170 -200 -150 -1U0 -210
IGNITION TIMING +U +3 -6 +6 +6 +3 -3 +6 +3
IGNITION DWELL -2 +8 -8 +5 -8 +11 -3
CHOKE ANGLE
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
to AIR CLEANER
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS
SPARK PLUGS
IGNITION WIRES
BLOWBY
DETONATION
ADD'L WORK REQ'D
LABOR, ACTUAL 13.00 6.00 11.00 1U.00 5.00 11.00 5.00 5.00 U.00 7.00 9.00
PARTS, ACTUAL 3.89 U.37 13.20 13.20 10.08 5.38
TOTAL, ACTUAL 16. 89 10. 37 2U.20 27. 20 5.00 21.08 5. 00 5.00 U.00 7.00 1U.38
Table 1C, Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO:
3«»
35
36
37
38
39
<*0
1»1
1+2
U3
kk
IDLE SPEED
IGNITION TIMING
IGNITION DWELL
CHOKE ANGLE
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
+ 30
~5
-70
+U
-U0
-5
~ 1
-30
~ 8
-30
~ 3
-3
-35
-90
-U
-90
-3
+ 1
+ U0
~ 3
-10
oo
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
AIR CLEANER
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS
SPARK PLUGS
IGNITION WIRES
BLOWBY
DETONATION
ADD'L WORK REQ'D
LABOR/ ACTUAL
PARTS/ ACTUAL
TOTAL, ACTUAL
7.00 2.00 U.00 7.00 5.00
2
2
6. 00
3.03
5.00
8. 00
k. U6
7.00
3.12
5. 00 2.00
7. 00 2. 00 It.00 7. 00 5.00 9*03 5.00 12.U6 10.12 5.00 2.00
Table ID/ Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO:
U 5
1*6
1*7
U8
U9
50
51
52
53
5i*
55
IDLE SPEED
IGNITION TIMING
IGNITION DWELL
CHOKE ANGLE
~ 150
-5
~ 120
~ 3
~ 2
-80
-8
-2
~ 50
~ 5
-100
-3
-300
~ 3
+ 12
-50
~ 3
-7
R
-100
-50
~ 3
-1*
~ 3
~ 2
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
X
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
X
X
X
X
AIR CLEANER
1
2
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS
SPARK PLUGS
IGNITION WIRES
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
BLOWBY
DETONATION
ADD'L WORK REQ'D
LABOR, ACTUAL
PARTS, ACTUAL
TOTAL, ACTUAL
2.00
2.00
1*.00
ft.00
17.00
16.13
33.13
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
1>*.00
11.76
25.76
X
230.00
9.00
6.63
15.63
13.00
5.33
18. 33
2.00
2.00
9.00
5.1*3
H*.«*3
3.
6.
9.
Table IE, Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO:
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65 66
IDLE SPEED
-80
-100
-60
-150
+ 30
-150
~ 200
~ 100
-30
-110 +30
IGNITION TIMING
~ 3
-3
~ 5
~ 5
-3
~ 3
-3
~ 4
-3 -7
IGNITION DWELL
-3
-3
~ 6
~ 3
-1
~ 10
CHOKE ANGLE
R
R
HEAR RISER
PCV VALVE
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
AIR CLEANER
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS 2 2
SPARK PLUGS 2
IGNITION WIRES
BLOW0Y
DETONATION
ADD'L WORK REQ'D
LABOR, ACTUAL 2.00 5.00 5.00 24.00 12.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
PARTS, ACTUAL 16.13 3.92
TOTAL, ACTUAL 2.00 5.00 5.00 40.13 15.92 7.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Table IF, Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
CAR NO:
67 68 69 70 71 72
73 7 *» 75
IDLE SPEED +35 +100 -50 -100 -70 -180 -100
IGNITION TIMING +16 +3 +13 +11 *k *12
IGNITION DWELL -10 -10 -6
CHOKE ANGLE R R
HEAT RISER
PCV VALVE
AIR PUMP
CHECK VALVE
GULP VALVE
AIR HOSE
AIR CLEANER 2 2
ROTOR
CAP
CONTACT POINTS
SPARK PLUGS 2 2 2
IGNITION WIRES
BLOWBY
DETONATION
ADD'L WORK REQ'D 63.U5
LABOR/ ACTUAL 5. 00 11.00 5.00 2.00 17. 00 Hi.00 7.00 U.00 4.00
PARTS/ ACTUAL 13.20 7.8k 5.31 5.50
TOTAL/ ACTUAL 5. 00 2U. 20 5.00 2.00 2fc.8U 19.31 7.00 U.00 9. 50
Table 1G/ Sample Maintenance and Costs
-------
REJECTION BY HC CKMC
100-
.090-
.080-
.070-
• 0 63-
.050-
.040-
.033-
.020-
.010-
.000-
2 1
2111 1 1
121 1 1
1
1 21 1
2 1
11 1
1 1
1 1111
1 21 1 1
1 1 1
111 1
1 11
1 1
111 12
1 1
1 . 11
1 1 1
1 1
20
40 60 80
PERCENT REJECTION
»
100
- + >
t
1 20
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE MUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT* AN "X*
IS PRINTED. " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC.
19930 E. COLFAX/ AURORA/ COLORADO 833T1
Table 2, Cost Effectiveness Plot
102
-------
.100-
>090-
.080-
E
F
y
E
C
T
I .070-
.060-
.050-
.040-
.030-
.020-
.010-
.000-
REJECTION BY HC IDLE CONCENTRATION
1
. .111
11211 1
11211
1 1 II
2 2 2
21 1
12
I .
I 1
1 I
111 111 11
11 1 11
11 1 111
1 1 1
2 I
1 I
. 2
1
20
40 60
PERCENT REJECTION
80
t
100
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT# AN 'X'
IS PRINTED. "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 30011
Table 3, Cost Effectiveness Plot
103
-------
REJECTION BY CO CKMC
.100-
H
•• •
C
C
0
.090-
s
•" * *;
T
E
F
.080-
. 1 .
F
** • * *
1 12 1
E
I I .2 I .2 1
C
11 1 .112111 1
T
1 .1211
I
.070-
1
V
E
N
E
S
.063-
s
.050-
11
l
11
• 040-
2
1
. .1.
Ill
.030-
11
1111
12
.1 1
1
1 .1 .
1
.020-
2 11121
t
* *
2
1
.010-
1
2
L
1
• 000-
f
f ' » t" f
0 20 40 60 80 100 1
PERCENT REJECTION
LEGEND: DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED." ....
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC...
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table U, Cost Effectiveness Plot
104
-------
REJECTION BY CO IDLE CONCENTRATION
.100-*
H " >
C +
+
C +
0 .090-+
S "
T +
~ 2
E + .212
r .080-+ .. i
F " + .... .1
E + .11.1. .2 . . .1
C + I .11 12.21 1L 12
T + ..11 1 111 .1 .1
1 .070-+ .11 11111
V ~ .11
E + 1
N ~
E + 11
S .060-+ 2
S " +
+
+
+
.050-+
•+
'4
4
4
.040-+
..
4 It.
+ 2 2 .11
+ 1
.030-+
.. j
+ .2
+ .1
+ It
.020-+ 1 1
+ .1
+ .. 1
+..1..
. +11
.010-+ 1
+ .
+ 1
+
+
.000-+—--+ + + + : + + + '- + + + + + >
,.y 1 f. f _...y
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
PERCENT REJECTION
LEGENDl DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAW NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED.' - - . - .
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA30RAT0RIES> INC....
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 800T1
Table 5, Cost Effectiveness Plot
105
-------
REJECTION BY HC CKMC
1.00-
0 0.90-
S
T
E
T 0.80-
F
E
C
T
1 0.70-
V
E
N
E
S 0.60-
S
0.50-
0.40-
0.30-
0.20-
0. 10-
0.00*
121
12
11212
11
1 2
1. 21
.11
1.1
1
.1 I
1 2
11
. .1 .1.1
11 11
.211
11
.1 .2 .1
.11 1
.1 1
1 .
2 1
20
40 60 80
PERCENT REJECTION
t
100
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON.GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X'
IS PRINTED."' " "
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA# COLORADO 800T1
Table 6, Cost Effectiveness Plot
106
-------
REJECTION BY HC IDLE CONCENTRATION
1.00-
0.90-
0.80-
0.70-
0.60-
0.50-
0.40-
0.30-
0.20-
0. 10-
0.00-
12
12 112
12 11
1 11
I 1
11 21 11
. I
111
1
1
. i
11
111
1
1 .1
I 1
. .1
11 .11.
1 1
1
11
11
1
.11
I 1.
.1111
.1.
11
1
1 1
20
40 60
PERCENT REJECTION
80
t
100
-+»
t
120
LEGENDt DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN 'X*
IS PRINTED." * "
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19930 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 803T1
Table 7, Cost Effectiveness Plot
107
-------
REJECTION BY CO CKMC
1.00-1
C " "+
0 +
~
C ~
0 0.90-4'
S " ~
T +
+
E +
F 0.60-+
T " '+ .LI .12
E + 11 . . I
C ~ ... 2 12.1.1 . ...
T + 112. 21U12U...
1 0.70-4 .1 11 LI
V + .1 1
E + 1
N +
E + 2
S 0.60-+
S " + .1
+ 1
+
~
0.50-+ 1
" +
+ I .
+ mill
+
0.40-+ 1 1
+"
+ 11
+ .1
0.30-+ 1
" '+ I. 2
~ .11
+' .LI
+ 11 1. .
0.20-+' II
+ 1
+
+' .1
. + 1
0.10-+
"+'
+ 1
+ 11..
+ 1
0.00-+.---+----+----+----+—--+----+—--+—
"I t" t f t ' " t
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
PERCENT REJECTION
LEGEND! DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN *X'
IS PRINTED."
.AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. .
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 890T1
Table 8, Cost Effectiveness Plot
108
-------
1.00
REJECTION BY CO IDLE CONCENTRATION
0 0.90
S
T
E
F 0.80
F
E
C
T
1 0.70
V
E
(J
E
S 0.60
S
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0. 10
0 . 00
. 1
2 1 1.12
. .1 .1
.1 LI .2 .21 1
1 11 1 1
LI 111
1 .
. 1
. .2 .
11 1
2121
I. . .1
.1. 11L.1.
1.1 111 ,
1
21
.1
1
11
11
20 ' 40 60
PERCENT REJECTION
80
V
100
• + >
' t
120
LEGENDS DIGITS SHOWN ON GRAPH REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COINCIDENT
DATA POINTS. IF MORE THAN NINE ARE COINCIDENT, AN »X'
IS PRINTED." " "
..AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC...
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLORADO 8007I
Table 9, Cost Effectiveness Plot
109
-------
APPENDIX 0
TEST SAMPLE AND EMISSION TEST DATA
Appendix D contains a description of the sample, emission
results and other test parameters. Abbreviations and codes
are used extensively throughout the data. The following
information is provided to define test codes and abbrevi-
ations and to designate units of measurement.
Vehicle and Test Cqdes
TEST NUMBER: ATL test designation
CAR NUMBER: ATL vehicle designation
BEFORE: before maintenance data designation
AFTER: after maintenance data designation
YEAR: model year for which vehicle was manufactured
MAKE: first four letters of vehicle make
MODEL: first five letters/numeral(s) of vehicle model,
exception: TBIRD is Thunderbird
CYL: number of engtne cylinders
CID: cubic Inch displacement of engtne
BBL: number of barrels In carburetor
ODOMR: number of miles indicated on odometer
INRT: curb weight of vehicle plus 300 lbs, rounded to
nearest 250 lb increment for vehicles weighing less
than 3000 lbs and to nearest 500 lb increment for
3000 to 6000 lb vehicles, also, dynamometer inertia
weight used for emission testing
RDHP: actual horsepower setting established at 50 miles per
hour for 1975 FTP as calibrated and determined by
coast down technique
A/C: Y indicates vehicle Is equipped with air conditioning
N indicates vehicle is not equipped with air
condltioning
111
-------
EVP: Y Indicates vehicle Is equipped with an evaporative
emission control system
N indicates vehicle is not equipped with an evaporative
emission control system
EXH: NO indicates vehicle is not equipped with an exhaust
emission control system (or it has been removed)
Al indicates vehicle is equipped with an air injection
exhaust emission control system
EM indicates vehicle is equipped with engine modifi-
cations for exhaust emission control
PCV: Y indicates vehicle is equipped with a positive crank-
case ventilation system
N indicates vehicle is not equipped with a positive
crankcase ventilation system
TRANS: Indicates transmission type, A for automatic, S-3 for
standard 3 speed, S-U for standard I* speed
Emi sslon Data Unlts
MPG: miles per gallon as calculated by carbon balance
technique from CVS bag data
1975 COMPOSITE: 1975 FTP emission tests results; units are
in grams per mile for HC, CO, CO2, N0X
SIMULATED 1972 COLD: composite results from COLD TRANSIENT
sample bag and COLD STABILIZED sample
bag, units are in grams per mile for
HC, CO, C02, N0X
SIMULATED 1972 HOT: composite results from HOT TRANSIENT
sample bag and COLD STABILIZED sample
bag; units are in grams per mile for
HC, CO, CO2,. N0X
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS: results from COLD TRANSIENT sample bag;
unit is total grams in bag
COLD STAB ILIZED GRAMS: results from COLD STAB ILI ZED sample
bag; unit is total grams in bag
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS: results from HOT TRANSIENT sample bag;
unit Is total grams in bag
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS: results from HOT STABILIZED sample bag;
unit is total grams in bag
112
-------
SPEED: actual speed at which the vehicle was driven during
Key Mode operation
COMPOSITE: composite Key Mode emission data derived from a
multiple regression analysis of modal data
CONC: abbreviation for concentration; units are parts per
million as carbon for HC, mole percent for CO and C02
parts per million for N0X
MASS: mass emissions as measured in CVS sample bag for each
mode; units are grams per mile for HIGH CRUISE and LOW
CRUISE and grams per minute for IDLE
113
-------
ATI CAR
NO.
YEAR
MAKE
MODEL
CYL
CID
PRL
ODOMR
1 NRT
RPHP
AZC
JL¥£
EXH
PCV
TRANS
1
1970
CHEV
CHEVE
8
350
2
37585
3500
11.2
N
N
EM
Y
A
2
1970
FORD
LTD
8
429
4
47496
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
3
1969
PLYM
FURY3
8
318
2
59290
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
4
1969
FORD
LTD
8
429
4
33441
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
*-5
1972
CHEV
CAMAR
8
307
2
7879
3500
11.2
N
Y
EM
Y
A
6
1968
PONT
GTO
8
389
4
68841
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
S-4
* 7
1971
PLYM
BARRA
8
318
2
18585
3500
11.2
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
8
1968
FORD
TBI RD
8
4 29
4
27986
4500
12.7
Y
N
EM
Y
A
* 9
1971
CHEV
C-10
8
350
4
12787
4000
12.0
N
N
A1
Y
S-4
10
1969
CHEV
NOVA
8
350
2
32731
3000
10. 3
N
N
Al
Y
A
m
1971
FORD
PINTO
4
122
2
7103
2250
8.8
N
Y
Al
Y
S-4
*12
1972
FORD
GALAX
8
400
2
10393
4000
12.0
Y
Y
Al
Y
A
*13
1972
PLYM
SATEL
8
318
2
8513
3500
11.2
N
Y
EM
Y
A
14
1969
PONT
CATAL
8
400
2
75644
4000
12. 0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
15
1968
CHEV
IMPAL
8
327
4
46072
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
16
1970
CHEV
CAPRI
8
400
2
32533
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
17
1969
OLDS
TORON
8
455
4
52867
4500
12.7
Y
N
EM
Y
A
18
1969
FORD
MUST A
8
428
4
31426
3500
11.2
N
N
Al
Y
A
19
1969
AMMO
440
6
232
1
69119
3500
11.2
N
N
EM
Y
A
*2 0
1972
CHRY
NEWPO
8
400
2
10730
4500
12.7
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
21
1970
LINC
CONTI
8
460
4
20038
5000
13.4
Y
N
Al
Y
A
22
1970
DATS
510
4
97
2
12449
2500
9. 4
N
N
Al
Y
A
23
1970
PLYM
SATEL
8
318
2
12922
3500
11.2
N
N
EM
Y
A
24
1969
FORD
LTD
8
390
2
35655
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
25
1970
PONT
CATAL
8
400
2
17070
5000
13.4
Y
N
EM
Y
A
Table 1A, Test Sample As Equipped
-------
ATL CAR
m*.
YEAR
make
MODEL
CYL
CID
26
1970
OLDS
VISTA
8
350
>27
1971
FORD
MAVER
6
200
*28
1971
CHEV
NOVA
6
250
29
1970
VOLK
SEDAN
4
97
>30
1971
TOYO
COROL
4
71
31
1970
DODG
DART
8
318
32
1970
MERC
MARQU
8
36
1972
CHEV
MONTE
8
It02
37
1970
AMMO
AMBAS
8
360
38
1970
FORD
GALAX
8
390
39
1968
DODG
POLAR
8
318
-* 40
1972
FORD
LTD
8
itOO
*41
1971
OLDS
TORON
8
l»55
42
1968
PLYM
FURY2
8
318
*43
1971
DATS
510
U
97
>44
1972
VOLV
142S
It
121
45
1970
VOLK
1600
-------
ATL CAR
NO.
YEAR
MAKE
MOP EL
CYL
CtP
* 51
1968
OPEL
KADET
4
91
52
1968
FORD
FAIRL
8
289
-# 53
1972
VOLV
142S
l*
121
¦X 54
1971
MERC
MONTE
8
400
-^55
1971
PONT
SAFAR
8
400
56
1968
BUI C
SPEC 1
8
350
57
1969
CHEV
IMPAL
8
350
58
1969
OLDS
DELTA
8
455
59
1968
PONT
TEMPE
8
350
60
1969
DODG
DART
6
225
61
1970
BUI C
ELECT
8
455
^ 62
1971
CHEV
IMPAL
8
(«00
63
1969
CHRY
300
8
383
61*
1970
FORD
MAVER
6
250
65
19 6 8
VOLV
144S
4
121
66
1970
PLYM
FURY
8
440
*6 7
1971
FORD
LTD
8
351
68
1970
CHEV
CAMAR
8
307
69
1969
VOLK
CAM PM
4
97
-*70
1971
DODG
COLT
if
97
.71
1968
CHEV
IMPAL
8
307
72
1969
CHEV
CHEVE
8
396
73
1968
CHEV
BE LA 1
8
307
74
1969
VOLK
SEDAN
4
97
*75
1972
BUI C
LESAB
8
350
Table 1C,
QPOMR
INRT
RPHP
AZJL
EVP
EXH
PCV
TRAN
46438
2250
8.8
N
N
N
Y
S-4
42332
3500
11. 2
Y
N
EM
Y
A
19175
2750
9.9
N
Y
EM
Y
S-4
9939
4500
12.7
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
10868
5000
13.4
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
23493
3500
11.2
N
N
EM
Y
A
35953
4000
12. 0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
11323
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
77968
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
21739
3000
10.3
N
N
EM
Y
A
38759
4500
12.7
Y
N
EM
Y
A
13300
4500
12. 7
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
34481
4500
12.7
Y
N
EM
Y
A
29780
2750
9.9
N
N
EM
Y
A
17054
3000
10. 3
Y
N
EM
Y
A
27056
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
21739
4500
12.7
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
25707
3500
11.2
Y
N
EM
Y
S-3
48310
3000
10.3
N
N
EM
Y
S-4
17247
2250
8. 8
N
Y
EM
Y
S-4
63396
4000
12.0
Y
N
EM
Y
A
40423
3500
11.2
Y
N
A 1
Y
A
72571
4000
12.0
N
N
EM
Y
A
33994
2000
8.3
N
N
EM
Y
S-4
10125
4500
12. 7
Y
Y
EM
Y
A
Sample As Equipped
ML
2
2
2
2
i+
2
4
2
2
1
4
2
4
1
2
4
2
2
1
2
2
i+
2
1
it
Test
-------
CATEGORY
MEAN
CARBON MONOXIDE
STANDARD
DEVIATION MAXIMUM MINIMUM RANGE ITEMS
AS
RECEIVED
QVW
1800-2799
46.95
26.69
100.68
22.47
78.21
15
2300-3799
65 V 9 6
26V3S
109V84
27V64
82Y20
20
3800-3799
87V55
33V88
194V24
38V44
155V80
35
4800-5799
59V25
20 V 84
89V78
35V43
54.35
¦ 5
MODEL YEAR
1968
87.1 1
44.75
1.94.24
27.64
166.60
15
1969
80V79
2IV98
1.2SV89
37V26
88V62
1.7
1970.
65Y69
28V03
109V84
22V 61
8 7.'.'24
18
1971
55V47
32V76
144V04
22V47
121V57
15
1973
68'.'9 5
32 V 59
119V75
28V 98
90V77
10
MANUFACTURER .
Ml. MOTORS
78.12
35.11
102.95
53.30
49*65
2
BUYCK
84V22
13V 60
103V57
72V34
31 '.'53
4
CADILLAC
46V 6 6
46.92
.46.66
46V 66
0 .00
1
CHEVROLET
80V39
40V79
194V24
39V50
154V74
14
CHRYSLER
103Y29
20V9I
119V7.5
79 V 7 6
39V99
3
DODGE
52Y30
16V22
,75V15
39V06
.36V09
.4
FORD
70Y76
45 V13
167V50
22V47
145Y04
15
IMPERIAL
0.00
*****
-**'*'**
*****
-**'*'**
0
LINCOLN
89Y78
90.51
89.78
89.78
0.00
1
MERCURY
62V24
20V85
87V74
37V26
50.48
4
OLDSMOBILE
91Y20
28V46
1.2SV89.
56 V 64
69V25
4
PLYMOUTH
74V21
27 V 35
1 21V 41
35V45 .
85V97
6
PONTIAC
71V7 3
21.83
88Y38
35V43
52V95
5
IMPORTS
52Y57
24V67
87V56
22 V 61
64V95
12
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
Q.W
1800-2799
47 . 24
24.21
98.52.
19.08
79.44
15
2800-3799
54V47
20V96
99V40
21V75
.77 V 65
20
3800-3799
77 V14
34 V 9 2
197V00
35V.94
161V06
35
4800-5799
S5Y71
12V83
70V27
35V 62
34V65
5
.. MODEL YEAR
1968
80.79
46.56
1.97.00
21.75
175.24
1.5
1969
67V80
21V 49
104V98
37V34
67V64
17
1970
56V 2 6
23V93
. 86V85
24V85
62V00
18
1971
48V39
27 V10
130V32
19V08
11IV23
15
1972
67V32
26V48
127V42
35V94
91 ".'48
10
MANUFACTURER . .
m• MOTORS
55.1 1
5.09
58.70
51.51
7.19
2
BUYCK
62 V 8 5
25V73
86V85
37V43
49V41
4
CADILLAC
53V92
54V02
53V92
53V92
0V00
.1
CHEVROLET
73V50
40V36
197V00
33 V 1.9
163V81
14
CHRYSLER
103Y03
2IV44
1 27'."42
87 V17
40V25
3
DODGE
49'.'40
1 1V3 1
64 V 67
37V34
27V33
.4
FORD
60V82
40V 21
150Y08
19Y08
130V99
15
IMPERIAL
0.00
*****
-*****
*****
-**"*'**
0.
LINCOLN
70Y27
72.97.
"70.27
70.27
0 • 00
1
MERCURY
51V04
16 V 21
74V97
39V7 5
35Y21
4
OLDSMOBILE
82V78
21V02
104V98
56V76
48V22
4
PLYMOUTH
62V 1 3
24 V 7.4
99V92
32V15
67V7 6
6
PONTIAC
58V86
20 V19
86V66
35V 62
51V04
.5
IMPORTS
53 V 3 5
24 V15
98V52
24V85
73V67
12
Table 2, Emission Data by GVW, Model Year,
Manufacturer, Before and After Maintenance
117
-------
HYDROCARBONS
STANDARD
CATEGORY MEAN DEVIATION MAXIMUM MINIMUM RANGE ITEMS
AS
RECEIVED
QVW
1800-2799
4.927
3.778
16.52
2.41
14.11
15
2800-3799
6V246
5V931
30".' 14
3Y26
26Y88
20
3800-3799
6.023
2V437
I5VS6
1.V70
13Y86
35
4800-5799
3V558
1VI 14
4V29
1V59
2V70
5
. MODEL YEAR
1968
7.673
4.059
16.52
3.82
12.71
15
1.969
6V845
6V055
30V14
3V98
26V16
17
1970.
4.824
2 • 217
12.02
2V4L
9V61
18
1971
4"."424
1V674
8V95
2V41
6V54
15
1972
4 ."27 7
2". 021
8Y28
1V59
6V69
10
MANUFACTURER
AM. MOTORS
4.514
.753
5.05
3.98
1.06
2
BUICK
5V018
1.V023
6".'15
3V82
2V33
4
CADILLAC
1V591
1V61 2
1V59
1V59
0V00
1
CHEVROLET
8V077
7V261
30 VI4
1V70
28V44
14
CHRYSLER
6V5.68
Y233
6Y74
6V30
0V44
3
DODGE
4"." I 60
V612
5'."04
3Y69
1V3S
.4
FORD
5V284
1V932
9V21
2Y80
6V41
15
IMPERIAL
0.000
*****
-**'**
*****
-*'***
0
LINCOLN
3Y823
3.834
3.82
3.82
0*00
1
MERCURY
5"."410
1.7 95
7Y97
4V01
3"." 9 6
4
OLDSMOBILE
4.9 80
,V7 10
5V53
3V94
1 '."59
4
PLYMOUTH
4V7 58
1V508
7 ".*63
3'."26
4". 37
6
PONTIAC
6YS0 2
3".'3 1 2
12 V13
4 V 1 4
7V99
5
IMPORTS
5V133
3V97 3
I6V52
2V41
14 V11
12
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
GVW
1800-2799
4.554
3*844
1.7.02 .
2.20
14.82
15
2800-3799
4 .47 9
J.Y956
11V82
2V7 3
.9.10
20
3800-3799
5V27 6
1.V855
12"."40
IV 8 8
10V53
35
4800-5799
3V830
1.528
5V16
1V33
3V83
5
. MODEL YEAR
1.968
6.696
3.640
17.02
2.90
14.13
1.5
19 69
4V7 23
•'947
.6V7 3
2V7 3
4V00
17
1.970
4V789
2V310
.11V82
2V43
9V40
1.8
1971
3V629
IV163
5.7 1
2.20
3V51
1.5
1972
4V034
2V090
8V69
1V33
7V35
10
MANUFACTURER
AM. MOTORS
4.552
.425
4.85
4.25
0.60
2
HJTCK
4'.'1 57
.'.'942
5V18
2V90
2V28
4
CADILLAC
1V 3 3 2
1 '.'342
.1V33
l'."33
.0.00
.1
CHEVROLET
5Y37 8
3Y090
12V40
1V88
10V53
14
CHRYSLER
6V233
V67 6
6V7 3
5V46
1 ".'27
3
DODGE
4V090
1 '.'402
5Y37
2V73
2V64
.4
FORD
4." 5 60
1V755
8Y30
2V34
5V97
15
IMPERIAL
0 V0 3 0
*****
-**"**
*****
-*"***
0
LINCOLN
4V977
5.060
4.98
4.98
0 • 00
I
MERCURY
4V462
'."886
5 V 3 7
3V47
f.'89
4
OLDSMOBILE
4V444
.".'495
5V04
3V83
IV 21
4
PLYMOUTH
4." 501
1.Y488
6V50
2V86
3V63
6
PONTIAC
5V445
1'.'3.7 6
7V65
3V85
3V81
.5
IMPORTS
5V087
4Y1 64
17 ".'02
2Y20
14Y82
12
Table 3, Emission Data by GVW, Model Year,
Mantifacturer, Before and After Maintenance
118
-------
CATEGORY
MEAN
OXIDES Or NITROGEN
STANDARD
DEVIATION MAXIMUM MINIMUM RANGE ITEMS
AS
RECEIVED
qw
1800-2799
2.720
1.181
5.894
1 .226
4.668
15
2B00-3799
37091
7993
47743
17445
37298
20
3800-3799
3'.'089
7996
57263
17295
37968.
35
4800-57 99
3V880
17675
67596
27292
4*7303
5
. MODEL YEAR
1568
2.972
1.113
5.263
1.295
3.968
15
1969
37460
17059
57031
17437
37594
17
L970
27925
.7732
47094
17445
27649
1.8
1971
37046
17523
6759.6
17285
57311
15
1972
2'."840
7936
47415
17226
37189
10
MANUFACTURER
AM. MOTORS
3.865
.212
4.015
3.716
.299
2
EUTCK
2.970.
17290
47899.
27199
27700
4
CADILLAC
27771
27775
27771
27771
07000
.1
CHEVROLET
3'." 1 38
17036
57263
17295
37963
14
CHRYSLER
27434
1.7032
37498
17437
27061
3
DODGE
27735
1.7257
47550
1.7818
27732
.4
FORD
37435
17303
57894
17285
47609
15
IMPERIAL
0V003
*'*>**
-'<***
mV***
-¥***
0
LINCOLN
2.292
2.302
2.292
2.292
0.000
1
MERCURY
37299
17357
47743
17465
37278
4
OLDSMOBILE
2." 659.
7 666
37647
2721.9
17428
4
PLYMOUTH
27881
.7400
37337
27412
7926
6
PONTIAC
37699
17899.
67596.
1.7692
47903
.5
IMPORTS
27679
7741
37761
17226
27535
12
AFTER
MAINTENANCE
GVW
1800-2799
2.756
.961
4.603
1.415
3.189
15
2800-3799
37095
7912
47889
17558
37331
20
3800-3799
27950
7943
57183
17487
37696
35
4800-5799
4." 177
17285
57505
27760
27745
5
. MODEL YEAR
L968
2.827
.820
4.285
1.538
2.747
15
19 69
37319
17020
57183
17940
37243
1.7
1.970
37326
.790 2
57399
17583
37815
1.8
1971
27974
17194
. 57505
17415
47091
15
1972
27407
7828
4717 2
17526
27646
10
MANUFACTURER
/M. MOTORS
4. 187
.501
4.542
3.833
.709
2
BUTCK
37267
17283
57183
27455
27728
4
CADILLAC
277 60
2777 5
27760
27760
0.000
.1
CHEVROLET
27684
7881
47285
17538
27747
14
CHRYSLER
27323
77.19
37152
17877
1727$
3
DODGE
37091
17135
47397
1.77 05
27691
.4
FORD
37129
17047
47603
17415
37189
15
IMPERIAL
0.000
*****
-'****
*****
-*!***
a
LINCOLN
47203
4.382
4.203
4.203
3 . 000
i
MERCURY
37629.
17169
47889
27298
27591
4
OLDSMOBILE
27761
7352
37020
27243
77 76.
4
PLYMOUTH
37045
.7915
47563
27032
27531
6
PONTIAC
377 45
17688
57505
17947
37558
.5
IMPORTS
277 1 4
7675
37501
17526
1797 5
12
Table i», Emission Data by GVW, Model Year#
Manufacturer, Before and After Maintenance
119
-------
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURES
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CAR t BEFORE AFTER IMP BEFORE AFTER IMP BEFORE AFTER IMP
0001
4.88
4.1 1
0.77
102.2
78.1
24.1
1.45
1.58
-0.14
0002
5.08
8.30
-3.22
65.6
83.6
-18.1
3.26
2.01
1 .25
0003
4.86
6.03
-1.17
65.6
78.4
-18V 8
3V34
2.43
0.91
0004
6.21
5.53
0.68.
86.2
54.4
31 .8
4.26
4.22
0.04
0005
5.'02
4.61
0.41
49. 2
49.5
-0V3
2.22
1V56
0.66
0006
12.13
7.65
4.48
88. 4
43.2
45.2
2.34
2.22
0.12
00 07
4.21
3.23
0.98
,79.7
40.6
39.1
2.41.
2.64
-0.23
0008
9.21
7.41
1.80
167.5
150". 1
17.4
2.51
1 .58
0.93
0009
6.35
5.65
0.7 0
73.4
79 V 1
-5V7
2.66
2.04
0.62
0010
5.83
4.59
1 V24
106.4
76.0
30.4
3V53
3.30
0.23
0011
8.95
3.85
5.10
100.7
59.3
41.3
1.28
1.41
-0.13
0012
4.66
3.28
1.38
105.2
54.2
51.0
4.41
3.25
I. .'17
0013
3.26
2.86
0.40
67.7
60.1
7.6
3.28
2.03
1 .'24
001.4
5.2L
5.22
-0.02
80.'6
66.8
1 3V8
3.77
3.65
0.12
0015
5.21
5.84
-0.63
50.5
101.3
-50V9
3.97
2V51
IV 47
0016
5.41
4.22
1.19
74. 1
68.2
11.8
3.65.
3.33
'0.33
00J.7
5.16
4.49.
0.67
87.V 1
93V3
-6.2
2.31
2.24
0.07
0018
6.54
5.61
0.94
91.9
99.4
-7.5
IV 9 9
3.35
-1.36
0019
3.98
4.25
-0.27
.53.3
.51.5
1V 8
4.01
4.'54
-0V53
00 20
6.30
5. 46
0.84
119.8
127 V 4
-7V7
2 V 3 7
1 .88
0.49
0021
3.82
4.98
-1.15
89.8
70.3
19.5
2.29
4.20
-1.91
00 22
3.22
2V50
0.7 2
33.3
37.3
-3V9
3.76
3. 1 6
0.60
0023
4.0 1
3. 83
0 V1 9
35.4
32.2
3 V 3
2.96
3V01
-0V05
0024
5.20
4.81
0.39
7 4 V 5
78.0
-3V5
5V03
3.43
1V 61
00 25
4 . 29
5.16
-0.87
67.8
62V0
5.8
4.09
5.40
-1.31
0026
5.29
5.04
0.25
95.2
76.1
19 . 1
2.22
2.85
-0.63
0027
2V80
2V3A
0.46
24.2
19. 1
5.1
5 V 89
4.60
IV 29
0028
3.42
2.91
0 V 51.
39.5
33". 2
6.3
3 V 87
3'."06
0.81
00 29
2 V 58
2V7 8
-0.21
44.4
38.0
6V3
2 V 43
3.00
-0.58
00 30
4.27
3 .28
0.99
46.2
42.8
3.5
2.12
3V24
-1VI 2
0031
3.82
5.23
-1.41
39. 1
48.0
-9.0
1.97
3.00
-1 .03
0032
7.97
3.98
3.99
65.8
39.8
26.1
3 .'49
3V06
0.44
00 33
6". 15
4.20
1V95
7 2.0
37.4
34.6
4.90
5V18
-0.28
00 34
1.59
1V33
0V26
46.7
53V9
- 7 V 3
2V77
2.7 6
0.01.
00 35
3.96
3.41
0V55
27 V 6
21 .8
5V9
4V33
3.52
0.81
0036
1 .70
1.88
-0. .18
.42.4
52.1 .
-9.7
2.89
1.99
0.9.0
00 37
5V05
4.85
0". 1 9
10 3.0
58.7
44 V 2
3.72
3.83
-0.12
0038
3.93
4 V 1 5
-0.22
50.4
39.8
1.0 V 6
2.98
3.07
-0.09
0039
5.04
5.37
-0.33
75 V 2
64.7
10V5
2 V 60
3V26
-0.66
0040
3V33
3 V 14
0."19
38.4
35.9
2.5
4". 18
4.17
0.01
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES/ INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA* COLO. 80011"
Table 5A, Emission Data by Car by 1975 FTP
120
-------
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING 1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURES
HYDROCARBONS
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CAR #
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
0041
3.94
3.83
0.11
56.6
56.8
-0.1*
3.65
3.02
0.63
0042
7.63
6.'50
IV13
121.4
99.9
21.5
2V88
3 V 60
-0.72
0043
a: 7 6
5.58
-2.82
37V9
36V2
IV6
2.83
3V50
-0V68
0044
4.03
8V69
-4.65
29.0
90.0
-61V0
2.60
2.20
0.40
0045
2.41
2.43
-0.02
22V6
24.9
-2V2
2.86
3 .01
-0V15
0046
2.41
2.20
0.21
27.1
28.6
-1.5
1.65
1.75
-0.10
0047
5.34
5V37
-0V03
37 V 3
42. 6
-5V3
4'.' 7 4
4V89
-0V15
0048
4.33
5.03
-0.70
87.7
75.0
12V8
1.46
2.30
-0V83
0049
6V74
6V51
0.23
79V8
94V5
-14V7
3V50
3V15
0.35
0050
4.60
2.50
2V10
22 V 5
25V 3
-2V8
2.36
3 ".08
-0V72
0051
16.52
17.02
-0.50
'86.7
98.5
-11.8
3.49
2.97
0.51
005 2
5.57
5.27
0.30
36.6
33V6
3V0
3V68
3V60
0V08
0053
8V28
4.73
3.54
87V6
66 V 9
20V7
1V 23
1V53
-0V30
0054
4.01
3.47
0V53
58 V1
46.8
1 1V3
3V49
4V27
-0.V78
00 55
4V14
3V85
0.30
35.4
35V6
-0V2
6'.'60
5V51
1 "."09
00 56
3.82
2.90
0.92
78.8
44.0
34.8
2.20
2.45
-0.26
0057
5.07
3.72
IV35
90.0
..40 V 2
49V9
2.96
2V62
0.34
0058
5V53
4.42
1V11
1 25V9
105V0
20 V 9
2.46
2V93
-0V47
0059
6.74
5.34
1.V40
86.5
86.7
-0V2
1V 69
1.95
-0V25
0060
4.08
2.73
1.36
52.2
37V3
14.9
4V55
4V40
' 0V15
0061
5.51
5.18
0.34
82.4
86.8
-4.4
2.33
2.73
-0.40
0062
4.54
2.99
IV 5 5
..44V0
44". 6
-0V6
3V39
3V29
0V09
00 63
6.66
6.7 3
-0V07
110.3
87V2
23". 2
1 ".'44
1.94
-0V50
0064
2.96
3.08
-0V1 2
26 VI
27V4
1V3
3 V 67
4 V17
-0.50
0065
4". 7 2
3.5 1
IV 21
57.9
42.0
15V9
3V36
3V47
-0.11
0066
4.58
4.56
0.02
. 75.4
.61 .5
13.9
2.42
4.56
-2. 1.4
0067
.6V27
. .5V7 1
0V56
1.44.0
1 30.3
13V7
1V67
IV 49
0'.ia
0066
12.02
11 '."82
0.20
109V 8
86 V1
23V8
3V09
3V90
-0V81
0069
5.97
4V03
1.94
64.9
68.3
16V7
3.02
2.72
0*30.
0070
3'."69
3.03
0.66
42.7
. 47 .5
-4V8
1.82
1V71
0.11
0071
15.56
12.40
3.16
194.2
197.0
-2.8
1.30
1.54
-0.24
007 2
30.14
4 V 28
25*86
8IV 7
69.9
11. 8
3 .69
2V 57
1.12
0073
7 .92
6.27
IV 6 5
67.9
59V6
8V3
5V26
4V28
0V98
0074
4.42
4.29
0.13
.7 3V3
66.8
6.6
2.81
2.02
0V80
0075
4.60
4V35
0.25
103 V 6
83.1
20. 5
2.46
2V71
-0V25
MEAN
5.70
4.82
.0.88
71.79
63.68
.8.1
3.07
3.03
0.04
PERCENT
15V 44
1IV 3
1V33
STD. DEV. 3.88 . 2.39
MAXIMUM "30V14 17V02
MINIMUM 1V59 IV33
RANGE 28VS5 15V69
COMPUTED T "-2.33 "
.33.56 .30.99
194V 24 19.7V30
28V47 .19V08
I71V77 177V91
-3.67 -
1.09
6V60
1V23
5V37
1.00
5V50
1V42
4V09
-0.420
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA/ COLO. 80011"
Table 5B, Emission Data by Car by 1975 FTP
121
-------
CAR
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0008
000.9
0010
0011*
0018
0013
0014
0015
0016
0017
0018
0019
0020
00 2 f
0022
0023
0024
0025
00 26
0027
00 28
0029
00 30
0031
0032
0033
0034
0035
00 3 6
00 37
0038
0039
0040
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING KEY MODE TEST PROCEDURES
(CONCENTRATION)
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
3754
3895
-141
3.38
3.48
-0.10
413
636
-223
4147
4049
.98
2 .70
3.22
-0V52
713
487
225
3172
3013
.159
1.43
2. 10
- 0 67
830
460
370
4430
3322
1 107
2".27
0.93
1.34
948
1019
-71
3370
2928
442
1.31
IV 50
-0.19
512
358
1 54
3892
1577
2315
1.75
0.17
1.58
761.
615
146
2675
2295
..380
1.80
0.94
0V85
611
668
-56
5461
3631
1829
3'.'90
3V68
0.22
478
294
184
2670
3322
-652
0.7.6
1.39
-0V62
455
57.2
-116
3933
3046
887
3V13
2V09
I'.'04
863
818
45
7350
4412
2938
4.37
1.79
2.58
364
549
-185
2864
2215
648
2»46
J.V20
IV26
832
713
118.
2715
2230
484
r.73
1.65
0V08
.829
.427
401
2646
2598
48
- 0.92
0.57
0.V34.
1045
1122
-77
3336
4037
-701
0V80
2V47
-1V67
895
593
302
3215
3058
I 56
1.89
2. 12
-0.23
908
918
-9
2124
2124
.. -0
0'.'94
1.08
-0.14
490
479
11
2S59
1808
1051
2"«63
2.15
0.49
.328
.532
-203
3117
3748
-630
I'.'89
lV7.fi
0 VI 3
1019
117.0
-1 50
3635
4001
-366
2.88
4". 11
-IV22
698
410
288
1325
31 65
-1839.
1.39.
1.87
-0.49
299
643
-344
2245
1203
1041
0 '.'7 1
0V62
-0V10
647
416
231
3267
3057
21.0
0.96
1.V06
-0.10
.641
560
81
3555
3136
419
2".' 03
1.V79
0V24
1187
.898
289
1999
2700
-701
l'.l 1
1.04
0.07
784
1249
-465
3067
369.5
-627
2.42
1.96
0.46
.620
774
-154
2927
2615.
312
0.95
0V78
0 V1 6
1.031
980
50
2384
1941.
.443
1V05
0V62
0.23
1089
.818
270
1767
1881
-.113
1V11
1.16
-0V05
885
1187
-301
3997
2307
1690
1.39
0.68
0V7 I
512
787
-274
3674
4244
• -570
2.22
1.73
0.48
561
916
-355
3590
3321
268
1.V93
1 "."48
0.45
.909
.806
102
3260
2422
838
1.43
0V63
0.79
1206
1470
-263
697
613
83
1.00
1V37
-0V37
.399
345
53
3282
3282
0
0V70
0V76
-0V06
1293
956
336
1152
1223
-71
' 1.22
1.24
-0.02
.487
.394
.92
3221
3216
.4
1 ".'7 9
1.19
0V.61
1244
1 108
135
2412
2926
-514
0.94
1". 13
-0". 19
596
67 5
-.79
3157
3458
-30.1
2". 37
2V53
-0V1 6
801
905
-103
2298
2179
119
1"."16
0V92
0V24
973
895
77
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, COLO. 80011"
Table 6A, Emission Data by Car by CKMC
122
-------
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING KEY MODE TEST PROCEDURES
(CONCENTRATION)
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CAR #
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
0041
17.61
1059
702
0.55
0.43
0.1 i
.655
.480
174
0042
3113
3060
52
1V49
1.28
0721
1056
1 130
-74
0043
1002
1772
t.770
0748
0755
-0707
478
591
-1.12
0044
2732
4541
-1809
1.J.5
3760
-2746
547
423
123
0045
1444
1069
375
0V17
0717
-0700
829
714
114
0046
3339
3045
294
0.81
1.07
-0.26
..594
.741
-147
0047
3953
3630
323
0V4S
0764
-0717
1290
1533
-243
0048
3453
3900
-446
2781
2735
0746
448
599
-150
0049
3972
3973
-1
2Y7 5
3721
-0747
738
518
220
0050
2932
2808
124
0.60
0782
-0722
741
783
-41
0051
9255
8743
511
4.63
5. 17.
-0.54
800
562
238
00 52
3794
4609
t81.4
0766
1701
-0735
896
898
-1
0053
8009
4098
3910
- 4764
3747
1717
.291
.359
-68
0054
2216
1949
266
0787
0758
0.29
1.103
1109
-6
0055
2888
2336
552
0V86
0754
0732
1289
1194
95
0056
2519
1890
628
1.67
0.65
1.02
.594
614
-20
0057
3398
2464
933
2718
0749
1769
1039
964
74
0058
3125
27.25
400
3.18
2755
0763
586
665
-79
0059
3360
3151
209
2702
2717.
-0715
.609
.633
-23
0060
2901
2609
292
1787
1791
-0703
1320
1121
198
0061
3297
3105
192
1.45
1.52
-0.07.
593
797
-204
00 62
I7.R2
2143
-361
1.48
1727
0721.
735
926
-190
0063
4114
399.8
115
4.60
4709.
0.51
392
378
.14
0064
2642
29.14
-272
1.09
1721
-0712
694
.864
-170
0065
3045
3114
-68
2712
1799
0713
960
I0S1
-91
0066
2736
2986
-2S0
2.42
1.83
0.S9
690
1070
-380
0067
4456
3752
704
5754
4728
1726
501
.376
125
0068
7206
7483
-276
2". 7 9
2747
0732
967
1152
-184
0069
2700
2334
..366
177.7
1734
0744
982
984
-1
0070
3651
2608
1042
3.18
3744
-0726
580
593
-13
0071
..5492
5043
.. 449
4.97
4*61
0.35
589
678
-88
0072
14079
1793
12285
1V 44
1728
0716
.838
.523
314
0073
5690
4792
898
2705
1771
0734
1.325
1179
145
0074
3160
2230
929
2.67
2700
0767.
1103
867
235
0075
2649
2974
-325
1V53
1741
0711
717
697
20
MEAN
3474
3048
.426
1.92
1.74
0.18
770
766
4
PERCENT
12.3
974
....
0.05
sto. dev.ma
1262
1 -17
1. is
.871
.284
MAXIMUM
T4079
6744
5754
SVL7
1325
1534
MINIMUM
. 607
614
0V17
0717
.891
.294
RANGE
13382
8130
5V 3 7
5700
1033
1239
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES# INC.
19900 E. COLFAX# AURORA# COLO. 80011"
Table 6B, Emission Data by Car by CKMC
123
-------
CAR .
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0008
000.9
0010
0011
0012
0013
0014
0015
0016
00J7
0018
0019
0020
0021
0022
0023
0024
00 25
0026
0027
0028
0029
0030
0031
0032
0033
0034
00 35
0036
0037
0038
0039
0040
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING KEY MODE TEST PROCEDURES
(MASS)
HYDROCARBONS
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
3.19
2.06
1.13
2.54
2". 15
0V39.
1.32
1.44
-0.1 1
2.39
1.81
0.58
1V19
1.36
-0.17
1.64
0.95
0.69
1.33
1.1.0
0.23
3.33
2 V14
1 V19
1.25
1.39
-0.14
1.77
1.44
0.33
l".65
J. 20
0.45
IV 53
1.27
0.27
1.33
!". 16
0.17
1.55
1 . A6
0.09.
1.83
2 V 1 3
-0.31
1.58
V. 53
0.06
1V 29
1.35
— 0 .06
2.02
1.53
0.49
1V23
1.7 9.
-0.56
2.04
2.21
-0.17
1 .01
1.94
-0.93
0V89
0.37
0V52
1.41
1.V62
-0.21
1.82
1.50
0.32
1.01
1". 54
-0.53
1.75
1.50
0.24
1 .04
0.72
0.33
0V99
0.84
0.15
0.50
0.54
-0.04
0V96
0.81
0.15
1.81
2.03
.-0.23
IV 8 9
1.70
0.18
1V77
1.06
0.70
0.66
0.59
0.07
1.57
IV 66
-0V10
0.79
0.78
0.01
IV80
IV 7 2
0.08
1.22
IV 65.
-0.44
1.V52
1.61
-0V08
IV 3 3
1.26
0.07
CARBON MONOXIDE
BEFORE AFTER IMP
29.1
32.7
-3.6
23V0
29.3
-6V2
19.9
23V 2 .
-3V2
27 V" 3
1.6 V 0
1 1.3
10.7
13.8
-3V2
18.6
.2.6
16.1
23 V 9
11.5
12.4
61.3
50V1
I IV2
9.1
18.8
-9V8
35V4
23.6
1 1V9
45.3
16.4
28.9
39.7
18.6
21.0
39.0
25V3
I3V7
-1.3V8
9.5
4.3
I 1.3
31.2
-20.0
19.7
22.9
-3.3
13.4
14.4
-1V 0
38 V 3
38 V 8
-0V5
17.3
17. 1
.0.2
39.9
52V3
-I2V4
21.4
27.0
-5.6
. 6V7
.7.4
- 0 V" 7
10 V 2
13V9
-3.7
24.0
22.0
2.0
14.7
12 V 4
2.3
27.9
17.8
10.0
8V7
6V4
2V3
7V8
8.1
-0.3
7.7
7V9
-0V3
9V8
7V5
2V2
22.9
16.1
6.8
21. 7
15V4
6.2
1 8.4
9.8
.8.7
23.3
33.6
-10 ". 3
9V1
10 V" 5
-1V5
25.2
24.9
0.3
28.7
1.9 V 3
9V4
14.5
18V0
-3V5
23.9
24". 6
- 0 V 7.
19.9
15V8
4. 1
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
1.56
1.73
-0. 17
2. 1.1
l.V'34
0.77
2.1.3
1.32
0.81
3V1.1
2V95
0 V16
1.11
1.06
0.06
2.09
2.76
-0.67
1.V76
1.V73
0.04
1.58
1.18
0 . 40'
IV 68
1 V9.0
-3V22
2.20
2 V 10
0.09
0.87
1.12
-0.24
2.72
2V"01
0.72
2V35
1V22
1.13
3V08
3V33
-0.25
3. 16
1.9 6
1.20
2.S3
2.29
0.24
2*00
1V82
0V18
1.44
1.86
-0V41
2V50
2.67.
-0V17
2 V 13
1.31
0V82
1.24
2.57
-1.33
IV 91
IV" 18
0V73
1V96
1.65
0.32
3.54
2V7 6
0V78
2.41
3.64
-1V23
1.88
2.14
-0.25
2V63
2V48
0.15
2.68
2V00
0.68
1.V77
2V15
-0V38
IV 27
1V91
-0V64
1.22
2.26
-1.04
2V73
2V47
0 V 27
4.42
4.78
-0.36
2.07
1.70
0V37
3 .50
2.86
0.64
2.19
1.82
0.38
3 V 14
3V29
-0V15
2.02
2V35
-0V33
2.02
2V19
-0V17
3.46
3V04
0V43
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. COLFAX* AURORA, COLO. 80011'
Table 7A> Emission Data by Car by CKMM
12k
-------
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS
USING KEY MODE TEST PROCEDURES
(MASS)
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CAR *
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
0041
i .09
0.79
0.30
10.5
,9.9
0.6
2.68
1.93
0.75
0042
I'.'66
1.44
0.21
17". 5
14.2
3.3
a V10
3.28
-0V18
0043
0.41
a. 67
-0V27
4.3
4.6
-0.3
1 .41.
1 .49.
-0.08
0044
0.93
1V2S
-0.36
8.9
26.2
-17.4
IV 31
0V7 1.
0 . 60
0045
0V48
0.47
0.00
0V9
1V0
-0.1
2 V15
1V71
0V45
0046
0.7.3
0.77
-0.04
5.8
7.3
-1.5
1.10
1.48
-0.38
0047
2V15
1.V69
0.46
6. I
7V3
-1V 2
3 V 63
4V16
-0VS3
0048
1.36
1 .60
-0V24
3 2 V 9
27.6
5V2
1 V24
IV 60
-0V37
0049
2.25
2.30
-0.05
34.9
44V4
-9.5
2.42
1V 64
0V78
0050
1.05
0V79
0.25
4.1
6.5
-2.4
1.55
1V97
-0.42
0051
6.73
6.04
0.69
39.3
51 .5
-12.2
1.75
1.35
0.40
0052
1.87
2.16
-0V29
8V3
14". 5
— 6.2
2V66
2V 50
0 V16
0053
3V37.
1.V30
2V07
38V3
28.7
9. 6
0V71
0.88
-0.17
0054
1.01
1.26
-0V26
-1 2V4
9V0
3V4.
3.58
3V57
0V01
0055
J. 7 8
1V56
0.22
13.1
10V2
2V9
4V95
4V4S
0V47
0056
1..22
0.96
0.25
20.2
7.4
12.8
2.01
2. 10
-0.09
0057
I.'5 8
1.V26
0.32
26. 6
5V5
21.0
2V76
2". 5 3
0.23
0058
l'."80
1.50
0.31
46.2
33'. 1
13.1
2V 32
2-17
0". 1 4
0059
87
1.V8.2
0.05
22.0
26V2
-4.3
IV 64
IV 00
0.63
0060
IV26
IV12
0.14
18.5
16 V 8
1 "«"6
2V92
2". 51
0V41
0061
£.82
1.82
0.00
24.0
21.9
2.1
2.09
2.52
-0.43
00 62
1.00
1.42
-0.V42
21 .0
16 V 6
4 V 5
IV 83
2V73
-0V90
0063
3.06
IV 91
1.15
46.6
46.9
-0V3
1V06
1.10
-0.04
0064
0.98
0V94
0.04
. .9.7
.8.7
JV0
IV 81
2V08
-0V28
00 65
IV08
0.80
0.29
1 6.8
15V5
1V4
2V07
2.23
-0V16
0066
1 .59
2« 16
-0.56
33.V
25.5
7.6
2.10
2.71
-0.61
0067
2.27
1V84
0.43
56". 7
38V7
18V1
1V25
0V89
0V36
0066
4.57
4.48
avaa
37V9
32V3
5.6
2V65
3V25
-0 . 60
0069
0V76
0V77
-0.0.1
1 3V4
1.J.V2
2V1.
1.V59
IV 50
0V09
0070
0.91
0.77
0.13
1 2.4
11.3
r.'i
1V17
1V35
-0V18
0071
-.2.90
2.85
-.0.05
47.9
44.3
3.6
1.75
1.74
0.01.
007 2
11V 20
0.80
10'.'40
25V7
20V9
4.8
3V61
2V 20
1V 41
0073
2V28
2V7 5
-0V«6
21.7
1.9 V 2
2.5
3.82
3V40
0.42
0074
0.85
0.74
0 V1 1
1 6V0
12 ". 2
3V7
2.40
2 V1 3
0V27
0075
1.60
1.67
-0.06
26." 2
21V 5
4.7
2V57
2 V 24
0.33
MEAN
1.78
1.51
.0.27
22.16
19.81
..2.35
2.24
2.16
0.08
PERCENT
15VI7
10Y60
3V57
STD. DEV,j[.45
0.83
13.08
12.08
0.84
0.84
MAXTMUfl
TIV2B
6V04
6IV29
5SV3S
4*94
4V78
MINIMUM
..0V41
0V37
0V92
l'."03
0V71
0V70
RANGE
I0V79
SV 67
60V 37
51V31
4V24
4V08
•¦
AUTOMOTIVE
TESTING
LABORATORIES/
INC.
19900 E. COLFAX# AURORA*
COLO. 80011'
Table 7B, Emission Data by Car by CKMM
125
-------
CAR <
0001
0002
00 0 3
0004
000 5
000 6
0007
0008
0009
0010
00JLI
0012
0013
0014
0015
0016
0017
0018
0019
00 £0
0021
00 22
0023
00 24
0025
00 26
0027
00 28
0029
0030
0031
00 32
0033
0034
0035
0036
0037
0038
0039
0040
IDLE CONCENTRATION
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
3477
4169
-692
4.02
3.75
0.27
104
108
.-4
4482
2854
1627.
2.43
0.88
1755
.88
196
-108
3647
4169
-521
1.26
3.706
-1780
102
.75
.26
9036
3578
5458
6.41
1710
5731
64
173
-109
6324
4899
1425
3775
3.70
0704
51
55
-4
7645
1428
6217.
5.56
0.15
5.41
34
34
-0
..4864
2332
2531
6.30
0 • 94
5736
63
78
-IS
13903
6533
7370
8.37
7V88
0749
54
60
-6
8688
8688
e
2". 7 4
4739
-1765
42
.60
-18
5907
2889
3018
5.93
2.83
3709
96
157
-61
17 206
4725
12480
8.47.
3.06
5.41
9
.79
-69
4516
2541
19.7 5
6.41
2774
3767
85
106
-21
4064
2889
1175
5V26
4 . 29
0797
.83
.77
6
3578
27 43
834
- 2770
0.88
1782
105
162
-57.
3056
5559
-2503
0 V 5 2
6.09
-5757
108
77
31
33.0 6
3028
27 8
1.23
1.81
-0.58
74
119
-44
2106
1706
400
0.09
0V10
-0702
54
109.
-!55
8862
3821
5040
4 . 5.9
3723
1736
..53
181
-128
4134
57.33
-1599
3V18
0.55
2763
121
279
-158
3821
4169
-347
4779
6714
-1735
81
69
11
2889
399.5
-1106
2.62
2.86
-0.24
103
.88
15
2778
1713
10.64
0". 1 1
1782
-1771
203
109
94
3404
2228
1 175
0V7.0
0716
0.54
1 19
164
-45
5246
1776
3470
5716
1714
470.2
.96
137
-41
5733
6880
-1 147
5701
3788
1713
109
196
-87
110 9
3473
-2364
5.16
2.60
2.56
62
.76
-14
3508
27 32
.7.75
4V14
3757
0.756
95
102
-7.
4864
3682
1 181
4.91
3715
1777
80
79
1
.2503
2854
-351
2.50
2735
0715
73
67
5
10774
1351
9422
2790
0740
2753
43
69
-25
2118
2848
' -730
0.69
0.35
0.34
210
188
.21
3473
1480
1993
2.90
0749
2741
113
239
-126
6324
2002
4322
5.46
0773
4773
74
318
-244
1358
1393.
-34
2766
3723
-0757
.58
.60
-.1
3543
3271
271
2 V 9 5
2766
0729
144
129
15
1584
1324
260
3.33
2.82
0.51
.48
56
-7
3543.
2784
758
5 V 06
1756
3750
114
216
-102
1741
2367
-626
0.35
0720
071 5
1.53
145
7
2245
2465.
-219
0.55
0731
0725
.146
1.51
-4
2819
1671
11 47
2790
0776
271 4
102
192
-89
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC*
19900 E. COLFAX/ AURORA# COLO. 80011"
Table 8A, Emission Data by Car by IC
126
-------
IDLE CONCENTRATION
HYDROCARBONS CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CAR #
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
BEFORE
AFTER
IMP
0041
2426
2228
198
1.03
1 .01
0.02
.60
82
-22
0042
2562
2489
73
0V99
0765
0734
110
87
22
0043
1007
976
31
0Y86
0737
0749
46
58
-1.2
0044
347.3
87 58
-5284
. 2782
6799.
-4718
59
45
14
0045
2419
1685
733
0721
0721
0 . 00
61
67
-6
0046
3376
3473
-97
1.13
1.49
-0.36
.81
.78
3
0047
4864
2645
2218
0721
0718
0703
105
149
-43
0048
1393
3237
-1843
2724
0741
1782
56
240
-183
0049
4238
4169
. 69
3740
4706
-0766
51
.67
-15
0050
4343
2670
167 2
0V16
1742
-1727
94
116
-21
0051
29965
25862
A102
8.47
8.47.
0.00
..22
.44
-22
00 52
1497
3126
r.1628
0V43
1.61
-1718
163
136
26
00 53
23637
5212
18425
8". 47.
6717
2730
.44
.63
-19
0054
2750
2054
695
" 1V 91
0792
079.8
L00
184
-83
0055
3508
2958
549
3VI0
1794
1717
103
97
" 6
0056
4273
1532
2740
5.68
0.51
5.16
61*
120
t.58
0057
5559
1727
3832
7 V13
0711
7702
82
19.5
-112
0058
4343
2437
1905
6707
2767.
373.9
.78
117
• _44
0059
2952
2297.
..654
0748
0761
-0713
121
214
-93
0060
3126
1821
1304
0798
0709
0789
232
200
31
0061
2152
2402
-249
0.13
0.66
-0.52
in
157
-46
00 62
1463
21.41
-678
0Y12
0741
-0730
807
315
49.1
0063
a>52
3126
..625
3V70
1762
2708
..75
88
-12
0064
1828
3125
-1297
0708
0718
-0710
108
.478
-369
00 65
3960
3995
-34
3757
3740
0717
111
125
-14
00 66
2784
2750
34
3.42
2.09
1.33
64
62
..2
0067
5038
2778
2259
6V79
2794
3785
78
98
-19
0068
22594
24054
-1460
8747
8747
0 .00
42
38
' 4
0069
..4099
21.24
19.75
4729
2726
2703
74
49
25
0070
11330
5177
6153
7739
5769
1771
60
53
6
0071
..7680
6081
'..1599
5.S0
3.02
2.48
151
438
-287
0072
17588
3132
14455
4796
3710
1786
48
40
.8
0073
1077.4
47 25
6049
5702
0717
4785
69
279
-210
0074
7819
3612
4206
7707
3723
3784
21
.77
-56
0075
3202
2778
423
3715
1749
1765
125
164
-39
MEAN
5493
3788
1105
3.51
2.28
1.23
97
131
. -34
PERCENT
31*04
35704
-35705
STD. DEV.5296
336S
2.49
8.08
93
87
MAXIMUM
29.965
25863
8V47
8V47
688
478
MINIMUM
1007
976
0708
0709
10
3S
RANGE
28958
£4887
8739
8738
798
443
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC*
19900 E. COLFAX. AURORA* COLOi 80011"
Table 8B, Emission Data by Car by IC
127
-------
Analysis
HC Before
HC After
Improvement
U/m)
U/m)
(*/m) (3:)
Mean
5.70
U. 82
0.88 15.1*0
Standard
Devi at ion
3.88
2.39
Maximum
30.1U
17.02
Mi nimum
1.59
1.33
Range
28.55
15.69
Computed
T Value
-2.
33
Analysis
Co Before
PQ After
ImDrovement
U/m)
(t/m)
U/m) U)
Mean
71.79
63.68
8.10 11.30
Standard
Devi at ion
33.56
30.99
Maximum
19U. 2U
197.00
Mi ni mum
22.1*7
19.08
Range
171.77
177.91
Computed
T Value
-3.
67
Analvsis
N°* Before
NO* After
ImDrovement
(«/m)
(tf/m)
(ir/m) (2)
Mean
3.07
3.03
O.OU 1.30
Standard
Devi at ion
1.09
1.00
Ma x1 mum
6.60
5.50
Mi nimum
1.23
1.U2
Range
5.37
U. 09
Computed
T Value
-0.
1*2
For a decrease (single-ended test)/ tg.gg * -2.326
given d.f « ® (Reference 9)
Table 9A, Analysts of 1975 FTP Emission Data
128
-------
Analysis
HC Before
HC After
ImDrovement
(fi/ni)
U/m)
U/rn) U>
Mean
1. 78
1.51
0.27 15.17
Standard
Devi at Ion
1.U5
0.83
Maximum
11.20
6.01*
Minimum
0.1*1
0.37
Range
10.79
5.67
Analysis
CO Before
CO After
Imp^yenient
(n/m)
U/m)
U/m) U>
Mean
22.16
19. 81
2.35 10.60
Standard
Devi at 1 on
13.08
12.08
Maximum
61.29
52.35
Mlnimum
0.92
1.03
Range
60.37
51.31
Analysis
NO* Before
N0x After
ImDrovement
(e/m)
(g/m)
(g/m) m
Mean
2. 2U
2.16
0.08 3.57
Standard
Devi at I on
0. 8U
0.8U
Maximum
. 91*
I*.78
Mlnlmum
0. 71
0.70
Range
i». 2U
U.08
Table 9B/ Analysts of Key Mode Mass Emission Data
129
-------
Analvsis
H£ Before
HC After
ImDrovement
(DDm Carbon)(DDm Carbon)
(DDmC) (£)
Mean
3i*7i»
30U8
1+26 12.30
Standard
Deviation
1910
1262
Maximum
1U079
87M*
Mi nlmum
697
61U
Range
13382
8130
Analvsis
CO Before
CO After
ImDrovement
Mean
1.92
1.7U
0.18 9.U0
Standard
Deviati on
1.17
1.12
Maximum
5.5U
5.17
Mi nlmum
0.17
0.17
Range
5.37
5.00
Analvsis
NO* Before
NO* After
ImDrovement
{ppm)
(ppm)
(ppm) (%)
Mean
770
766
U 0.05
Standard
Deviation
271
284
Maximum
1325
153U
Mi nlmum
291
294
Range
1033
1239
Table 9C/ Analysis of Key Mode Concentration Emission Data
130
-------
Analvsls
HC Before
HC After
ImDrovement
(DDm Carbon)(DDm Carbon)
( DDfTlC ) (*)
Mean
5«*93
3788
1705 31.0«*
Standard
Devlat ion
5296
3862
Maximum
29965
25863
Mlnimum
1007
976
Range
28958
21*887
Analysis
CO Before
CO After
ImDrovement
(mole %)
(mole i)
(mole*) (*)
Mean
3.51
2. 28
1. 23 35.01*
Standard
Deviat ion
2.1*9
2.08
Maximum
8.U7
8.1*7
Mini mum
0.08
0.09
Range
8.39
8.38
Ana 1*5U
NO * Before
N°x After
Impr.o Yemen t
(DDm)
-------
TEST NLMeFR: FCC19
CAP MJP6EP: 0CC1
EEFCBE
CYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS IS IN; C
1S75 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
Yc AR M AK F MCDEL CYL TIC RPL CCCMR IM?T RCHF A/C EVF EXH FCV TRANS
1970 CHF.V Ct-EV E fi 350 2 37585 35CC 11.2 f> N EM Y 4
GRAMS PER M I L F
1975 CCMPDSI7F
KC
4. sa
cc
1C2.24
CC 2
A 5 3 . S
KCX
1.45
PPG
14. 14
SIMUL A TE C 1S72 CCLC
SIMULMFC 1 <572 HCT
5 . 6C ICS.21 163.6 1.37 13.64
4.34 Sfc.SE 446.6 1.5C 14.53
COLD TRANSIFNT GPAMS 25.C3 405.15 15SC.8 5.73 14.CS
CCLC S T A E I L 17PC GRAMS 16.S9 413.<56 1EE6.1 4.53 13.24
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 15.58 313.3? 1463.5 6.74 16.21
HOT STABILI7EC GRAMS 15.20 285.CS 1S76.S 6.2S 13.86
44444444*44*4444*44444»*4«*4444«*
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCOE EMISMCNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MFC
HIGH CRUISE ^5 CGNC 3925
MASS 4.C8
3.S3 12.27 11C6
63.7S 4S2.1S 4.24
14.S6
LCK CRUISF 30 CCNC 3C80 C.5S 14.23 561
MASS 5.78 S.ll 3 51.26 3.17
23.2C
IDLE
0 CCNC 3477 4.C2 12.IS 1C4
MASS 2.46 18.87 S5.1E C.1C
C .CC
COMPOSITE 25 CONC 3754 3.3E
MASS 3. 19 29 .C7
4 13
1.56
AUTC*CTIVE TESTING LAPCRATTR I ES , INC.
1S900 F. CCLFAX, M.«CF«, CCLC. 8CC11
132
-------
TEST MPRER: ECC26
CAR NUMBER: CCC1
AFTER
OYNAMfMETFR EKISSICN RESILT5 LSUG
1
-------
TEST MfPER: ECC2C
CAR NLNEER: CCC2
EEFCPE
DYNANCNETER F^ISSICN FESLLTS ISINO
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR PAKE CCDEL CYL CIC PEL CCCNP I NR 7 RCHF A/C EVP EXK PCV TRANS
1970 FCRC L TO 8 429 4 47496 400C 12. C Y N E" Y A
GRAYS PEP MLF
1975 CCPOSITF
HC CO CC2 NCX MPC-
«
5.CS 6 5.5E 5 € A .
¥ PC-
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 4238
MASS 6.52
3.31 14.44 1434
60.19 543.22 5.55
13.53
LGVi CRUISE 33 CCNC 2958
MASS 3.1C
C .6 5 It.32 1,4 73
16.32 49C .74 4.£1
16.92
IDLE
C CCNC
NASS
4462
0.8C
2.43 15.C5
9.5e 72.62
88
C .C5
C.CC
CCMPCSITE 71 CCNC 4147 2.7C
MASS 2.54 23.C2
7 13
2.11
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAHCRiTCR I ES , INC,
1990C F. CCLFAX, AIP.C»A, CCLC. 9CC11
134
-------
TEST MJ*?ER: EC027
CAR MlPBcR: CCC2
AFTER
OYNAMC^ETER EMSSICN RESULTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECIRES
YFAR VAK E fCDEL CVL CIC EeL CCCHR INS T RCt-P A/C EVP FXH PCV TRANS
1970 FCRC LTD e 429 4 A75 17 4C0C 12.C Y N Ef Y A
GRA^S PFP f ILF HC CO CC2 NC> MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
8.30
83. 64
<14.5
2.CI
11.S3
SIVULATEC 1972 CCLC
13.59
IC7.14
62 2.2
1.91
1C.67
STfULATEC IS 72 HOT
4.32
65.91
6CE.C
2.C8
12.28
CflLD TRANSIENT GR 'MS
05.99
593.53
2C13.8
6.56
10. 1C
CtlLD STARILIZEC GRAfS
15.93
21C.05
2659.9
7.73
11.28
HOT TRANSIENT GRAfS
• It.44
2 84.24
1899 .S
7.88
13.55
HOT STAeiLWEC GRAPS
14.17
164.57
26CS.3
8.2C
11.76
***********
* * * *
* 4 « *
*****
* * * *
* ~ * * *
ANALYSTS CF KEY-KOE EMSSICNS
SPEFO HC CC CC2 NCX PFG
UGH CRUISE 49 COSC 4516 A.46 12.13 eg4
MASS 5.11 91. 97 .473.66 3.52 14.C3
. LDK CRUISE 33 CCNC 295e C.96 14.44 e55
MASS 2. 75 21. 59 * 32.41 2.59 If.75
IDLE 0 CONC. 2854 C.8E 14.44. 196
HASS 0.83 5.95 118.57 C.I7 O.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 4C49 3.22 487
fASS 2.15 29.26 1.34
AUTC^CTIVE TESTING LAPCRATCP 1£S , INC.
199CC E. CCLFAX, tlRC.Pt, CCLC. 8C011
135
-------
TEST NLHBER: ECC24
CAF NU^eEH: CCC3
BEFCRE
CYN4Mn«ETER E" ISS ICN PESILTS USING
1S75 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YFAP fflKE PfDEL CYL C T C RPL CCCVR INRT R CHF A/ C EVP F>H PCV TRANS
1969 PL Y V FLRY3 6 318 2 5929C 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP M I LE
1975 CCKFCSITE
HC
4.8 6
CC
65.62
CC2
5 2J.1
NCX
3.34
PPG
13.SC
SlfULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 l-PT
6.33 E6.C2 524.2 3.It 13.11
3.15 5C.24 52C.6 3.47 14.57
COLD TRANSIENT GR A" S 32.6 1 448.99 1774 .2 12. C4 12. 5S
CCLD STABILIZFC GRAfS 14.SC 196.15 2157.2 11.63 13.65
(-CT TRANSIFNT GRAPS 13.22 1EC.63 1747 . 1 14 .42 15.66
HOT STABILIZEC GRAPS 15.06 193.87 2I1E.2 11.22 13.SE .
ANALYSIS GF KEY-PCCE EPISSICNS
SPEEC
HC
CO
CC2
NO
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3056 1.7C 13.85 1859
KA SS 2.79 44.e3 .474 .74 6.2C 16.C7
LCto CRUISE 33 CONC 313? C.79 14.74 1569
MASS 2.43 16.52 392.66 4.C5 20.89
IOLE
0 CONC 3647 1.26 13.45 1C2
MASS 0.56 10.73 EC.67 C.C5
C.CC
CCPPCS ITE ?7 CCNC 3172 1.43
MASS 1.32 IS.92
63C
2.13
AUTCPOTIVE TESTING I ARCPATCP I ES , INC.
1990C E. COLFAX, AlPCRA, CCLC. 5CC11
136
-------
TEST KUMFER! EC032
CAP PER : CCC3
/FT EP
CYNA*CMETER 6K I SS ICN PESILTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YE AR wbkE WCOEL CYL CIC RPL CHCPR 1NRT PCHF A/C EVF EXK FCVi TRANS
1969 PL YP FLHY3 8 318 2 59299 4C0C 12.C Y N EM * A
GPAvs PEP wjlE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC 2 NC X fPG
6.C3 78.44 525. C 2.43 13.34
SIKULATEC 1972 COLC
SIfULATEC 1972 HCT
8.66 99.6 5 53 6.4 2.34 12.36
4.C4 62.4 3 516.4 2.5C 14.2C
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 48.73
COLD STA61LI2ED GRAPS 16.25
HOT TRANSIENT GR Af S 14.C8
HCT STABILI2EC GRACS 16.C3
*««««»«**«««««<
518.22 1776.2 7.9t 11.84
229.15 2246.7 9.5E 12.9C
239.11 1626.2 9.14 15.85
267.26 2Ce5.C 8.58 13.42
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
*FG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 2715
PASS 2.88
2.C9 13.65 1222
52.17 . 49C.29 4.32
15.3;
LCVi CRUISE 33 CCNC 3028
MASS 2.47
1.56 13.£5 72C
3C.64 36C.24 1".62
21.4C
IDLE
C CCNC 4169 3.C6 12.72 75
PASS C.69 1C .49 66.96 C.05
C.CC
CCMPOSITE 27 CCNC 3013 2.1C
MASS 1.44 23.1?
46C
1.32
At'TCCT I VE TESTING L ARC P A IC R IE < , INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AI.PCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
137
-------
TEST NUM8ER: E0025
CAR NUfeER: CCC4
eEFORE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS USING
1ST5 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECURES
YEAR MAK F MODEL CYL CIO BBL CDCMR INRT RCt-P A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 FCBD LTC 8 429 4 33441 ACOC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NO X MPG
6.21 86.2C 53e.8 A.26 12.83
SIMULATED 1<572 COLO 6.72
SIMULATED 1972 HCT 5.84
92.29 555.9 4.11 12.33
81.6C 526.C A.38 13.24
COLD TRANSIENT CRAMS 2ft.?? 319.03 1967.5 17.71 12.74
COLD STABILIZED GR A P S 24.14 373. 1 4 22C1.6 13.13 11.97
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 19.63 238.86 1743.1 19.69 14.91
HCT STABILIZED GRAMS 21.34 309.62 2152. 1 13. Ct 12.67
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCDE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NOX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC 3369
MASS 4.08
1.49 14.99 2!ie
41.77 549.65 1C.18
14. 18
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3647
MASS 3.46
1.09 15.36 1628
28.47 446.37 4.40
17.74
IDLE
0 CONC 9036 6.41 11.79 64
MASS 1.53 21.35 61.94 C.C8
o.cc
CCMPCSITE 27 CCNC 4430 2.27
MASS 2,39 27.26
948
3.11
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA8CRMCRIES, INC.
19900 E. C flL F 4 X » ALR'CRA, CCLC . 80011
138
-------
TEST NUM8ER: EC031
CAP M.FBEB: 0CC4
AFTER
CYNAMQMETEfi EMISSION RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TFST PROCEDURES
YEAR MAKE MO')E L CYL CIC BBL CDC^R INRT BCHP 4/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1969 FCP.C LTO 8 429 4 33461 4CC0 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CO
CC2
NO X
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.53
54.3f
611.7
4.22
12.46
S IMULATED 1972
COLC
5.64
66.5C
63C.1
4.20
11.83
SIMULATE!) 1972
HOT
5.45
45.24
597.8
4.24
12.98
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
23.64
292.89
2198.9
18.54
11.89
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
18.67
2C5.81
2527.C
12.94
11.78
HOT TRANSIENT
GRA^S
22.2C
133.45
1956.3
18.82
14.54
HOT STABILIZED
GRAMS
16.84
138.37
2466.4
13.49
12.52
* « *
* • * *
« # * 4 *
~ * *
* * « « «
« « » ~ *
ANALYSIS OF
KEY-MODE
•EMISSIONS
SPEED .
HC
CO
CC2
fkCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
3300
1.07
13.79
2788
MASS
3.77
3 6.71 .
483.83
9.53
16.CC
LOW CRUISE 33
CCNC
3035
C.22
14.CC
1531
MASS
2.8C
16.34
421.28
4.13
19.54
I OLE 0
CONC
3578
1.1C
13.59
173
MASS
0. 85
7.01
113.12
C . 14
o.oc
COMPOSITE 27
CONC
3322
C .93
1C 19
MASS
1.81
16. CC
2.95
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES
19900 F. COLFAX, AUPCCLC.
. INC.
30011
139
-------
TEST NUMEER: E0029
CAR NUMBER: CC05
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN RESULTS USING
1575 FEOERAL TEST PROCEDURES
year MAKE MODEL CYL cm RRL CDCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1972 CHEV CA"ER 8 307 2 7879 350C 11.2 N Y AI Y S-3
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX M PG
5.02 49.21 449.8 2.22 It.AC
SIMULATFD 1S72 COLD 5.11
SIMULATED 1972 HCT A.72
51.34 457.5 2.21 16.C4
47.6C 444. C 2.22 16.68
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 22.95 236.59 1545.6 9.46 16.34
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 17.66 148.44 ieE6.C 7.14 15.76
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 17.72 20e.59 1444.2 9.53 17.78
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 16.24 149.03 ie67.6 6.e7 15.92
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2917 0.89 14.14 2285
MASS 1.81 13.76 3C1.28 4.44
27.1C
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 1344
MASS C.95
C.4 3 12.C5 228
4.93 342.11 C .50
25.24
IDLE
0 CCN'C 6324 3. 75 12.27 51
MASS 0.97 10.43 61.21 0.C3
o.oc
CCPOSITF 25 CON'C 3370 1.31
MASS 1.19 10.66
512
1.11
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LARCRAT CP IES , INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, ALRCR/W CCLC. 80011
l
-------
TEST ' MHBER: ECC37
CAB MJMB ER t 0005
AFTER
^ DYNAMOMETER EMISSICf. RESLLTJ ISING
1975 FEOERAL TEST PRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CTC 9PL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP FXH PCV TRANS
1972 CHEV CAHER 8 307 2 7898 35C0 11.2 N Y AI Y S-3
GRAMS PER PILE
HC
CC
CC2
NOX
MPG
1975 COFGS1TE
4.61
49.5C
471.2
1.56
15.8C
(SIMULATED 197?
CCLC }
5.OS
54.3C
4ec.4
1.57
15.31
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
4.2J
45.88
464.3
1.55
16. 2C
CPLD TRANSIENT
GRA"S
22.76
262.97
1556.1
6.65
15.92
CCLD STABILIZEC
GRAMS
15.39
144.25
2C47.C
4.92
14.76
hOT TRANS IE^
GRAMS
It.AS
iss.ei
1434.9
6.69
18.C5
HOT STABILIZED
GRAMS
14.61
150.26
1S33.S
4.81
15.47
«• * »
* * ~ *
~ * ~ *
* » * ~
# ~ « * *
* * * » *
ANALYSIS OF
KEY-MCDE EMISSIONS
SPEED
HC
CO
CO 2
NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
2715
1.17
14.53
1492
MASS
3.C8
22.7?
312.16
3.97
24.90
LOW CRUISE 23
CONC
97fc
C.52
14.14
2CC
MASS
1.06
13.C7
287.72
0.74
26. 56
IDLE 0
CCNC
4899
3.7C
12.19
55
MASS
0.68
10.47
62.CC
C.C4
c.oc
CCMPCSITE 20
CONC
2928
1.5C
358
MASS
1.36
13.84
1.06
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L ABC R
19900 E. COLFAX, ALRCRA,
ATCRIES
CCLC.
, irvc.
ecc 11
U1
-------
TEST Mf PER J ECC30
CAR NUMBER: C006
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER F«ISSICN RESLLTS L SI KG
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MCDFL CYL CID E?L CCOR INRT RCHP A/C EVP E XH PCV TRANS
196F PDNT OTP e 389 4 68841 4C0C 12.C V Y A1 N S-4
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CnwpOSITE
HC CC CC2 NOX CPG
12.13 88.ie 5E1.3 2.34 11.74
SIMULATED 197? COLC
SIWULATEC 1 <572 HOT
ib.21 U6.4e see.2 2.22 ic.74
7.55 67.IP 576.2 2.44 12.62
COLD TRANSIENT GPA"S 102.29
COLD STARILIZEC GPAfS 34.27
HOT TRANSIENT GRAVS ?2.35
HOT STABILIZED GRAPS 32.2®
533.32 1S67.S S.14 1C.3S
340.2<5 2443.6 7.48 11. 11
163.53 1E77.6 1C.6C 14.74
318.7C 241E.S 7.49 11.35
*********************************
ANALYSTS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEEO HC CO CC2 NOX
f PG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3300
MASS 1.97
1.07 13.75 2768
3.3 < 4*6.<56 6.62
17.52
LOW CRUISE 3C CONC 142e
C.3C 13.36
£17
MASS 1.79 7.80 4C6.88 3.34
2C.96
IDLE
0 CCNC 7645 5.56 7.CI 34
MASS 1.53 26.51 56. <5 5 C.C3
C.00
COMPOSITE 26 CONC 3892 1.75
MASS 1.64 18.64
761
2.09
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LARCRATCPIFS. INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AURCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
1U2
-------
TEST NUMBER t ECC38
CAP NUMBER: 0C06
AFTER
DYNAMQHETER FMISSICK PESLLTS LSING
1975 FECFRAL TEST FRCC ECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CIC HEL CCCMP HPT RChP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1968 PGNT GTD e 389 1 6Ee6C 1CCC 12.C Y Y AI N S-1
GRAMS PEP MILE
K'
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
7.65
**4
CM
•
5C1.9
2.22
11.92
SIMULATEH 1972
COLC
12.31
73.C2
516.1
2.15
13.29
SIMULATEC 1972
HOT
1.12
2C.72
196.1
2.27
16.13
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAYS
75.95
161 .7e
1736.1
1C.C9
12. C 3
COLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
16.59
e 5. e 3
2 131.1
6.C6
11.77
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11.29
69.56
1566.7
1C.96
IE.65
HOT STABILIZED
GRAMS
15.51
72.57
1916.3
6.12
16.25
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 19 CCNC. 1567
MASS 1.92
0.17 13.0C 25=6
<1.17 163.76 9.56
17.92
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 1897 C.25 12.72 113
MASS 1.96 5.26 1C7.6C 3.28
21.1C
IDLE
G CONC
MASS
1128
0.41
C.15 9.71
1.35 69.52
31
C.C5
C.CC
COMPOSITF
26 CCNC
MASS
1577
C. 95
C.17
2.57
6 15
2.76
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L />EC R /> 1C R I E S INT.
1990C E. COLFAX, ALRCA, CCLC. 8C011
1«»3
-------
TEST M'MEER: EC035
CAR MPeER: CCC7
EfFCPE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN RESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE. MCPEL CYL CIO 9PL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXh FCV TRANS
1971 PLYM eARRA e 318 2 18595 35CC 11.2 Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PEP MILE
1975 C CM PC SITC
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
A.21 79.68 512. C 2.41 13.tS
SIfULATCC 1S72 CCLC A.60
SI MUL AT EC 1<572 HOT 3.SI
88.5t 523.6
72.<5E 5C3.2
2.46
13.15
14.13
COLC TRANSIENT GRAMS 18.<52 328.61 1852.4 <3.42 13.3V
CCLD STABILIZFC GRAMS 15.58 335.56 2C75.C 6.17 12.S3
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 13.76 211.81 USE.7 1C.2S 15.67
HCT STABILIZEC GRAMS 3C3.43 2C36.5 £.17 13.4C
ANALYSIS CF K EY-MC C E - EM S S I CN S
SPEEC HC CC CC 2 NC>
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2019
MASS 2.20
C.62 13.65 1376
21.24 516. C3 5.17
16.CI
LOW CRUISE 3C . CCNC 3324
MASS 2.68
1.02 13.73 1183
22.S4 372 . 5 1 3. 27
11.35
IDLE
0 CCNC 4864 6.3C 1C.46 63
MASS C.78 25.1C 68.13 C.C5
O.OC
COMPOSITE
25 CC NC
MASS
2675
1.33
1.6C
23. PS
611
1.76
AUTCfCTIVE TESTING LA PCRATCR IES. INC.
1 <590C E. COLFAX, HRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
1UU
-------
TEST NLMBEP: ECC46
CAP NLMeER: 0C07
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS LSING
1575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECtJRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC BR I CCCP" I:NRT PCI-P A/C EVP E*H PCV TRANS
1971 PLYM EARRA P 310 2 1E6C7 35CC 11.2 Y Y EM Y A
GRAB'S PER MILE HC CC CC2 NC* MPG
1575 COMPOSITE 3.23 40.62 527. 6 2 .64 14. EC
SIMULATED 1572 CCLC 3.50 48.22 54C.2 2.55 14.2C
SIMULATED 1572 HCT 3.C2 34.65 51E.1 2.71 15.29
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.11
212 .65
1675.1
5.71
14. 4C
COLD
STAEIL WfC
GRAM?
12.17
148.97
2172.4
5.44
14.02
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
10.5C
112.72
1713.6
1C .85
16. 5C
HOT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
10.79
1C7.65
2175.2
5.C5
14.42
*********************************
ANALYSIS cf key-mcde emssicns
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2176 1.C4 14.74 1415
MASS 2.37 26.46. 522.17 5.23 15.56
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3C2P C.8C 15.C5 1338
PASS 2.27 14.S6 335.57 2.<39 24 .C4
IDLE 0 CCNC 2332 C.94 15.C2 78
MASS C.41 5.C2 73.7C C.C5 C.OC
COM PCS IT F 26 CCNC 2255 C.S4 (fg
MASS 1.10 11.45 1.73
AllTCMCTlVP TESTING L A PC P 4 TC R I E S , INC.
19900 E. r.GLFAX, ALRCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
11*5
-------
TEST MMBER: ECC36
CAR NUMBER: CCC8
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESULTS ISING
1 <375 FEDERAL TEST PRCCEOUKES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CID RBL CDCMR INRT RCI-P A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1968 FORD TR IRC 9 429 4 27986 4500 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PFP KILE
1975 CCPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NOX MPG
9.21 167.5C 6CC.S 2.51 9.S7
SIMULATED 197? CCLC
SIMULATED 1 <;72 HOT
10.45 175.52 63S.5 2.63 9.39
8.24 161.46 571.6 2.43 10.46
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 42.84
CCLD STARILIZEC GRA^S 35.S4
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 25.SP
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 33.6C
558.28 22(52.4 11.7C 9.86
758.1C 2514.2 7.99 8.98
452.83 1774.5 IC.2C- 12.66
712.82 2265.4 7.68 9.82
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 50 CONC ' 3578 3.1C 12.67 1540
MASS 3.75 72.55 465.25 5.57
15.07
LOW CRUISE 35 CCNC . 3612 3.06 12.86 6C5
MASS 2.99 63.83 373.86 1.64
18.41
IDLE
0 CCNC 13903
MASS 3.20
8.37 7.85 54
56.43 78.41 0.C5
C.OC
CGMPOSITE 28 CONC 5461 3.9C
MASS 3.33 61.2S
478
1.58
AUTCMCTIVE TFSTING LABCRATCP IES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. SCO 11
H6
-------
TEST M'MPFR: E0C45
CAP MlKBEBs CCC8
AFTER
DYNAMOMETE R EMISSION RESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURES
YEAR HAKE MODEL CYL CIT 8BL CDTMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1968 FC1RC TEIRC 8 429 4 28008 4500 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
7.41 150. CE 593.9 1.50 10.44
SIMULATEC 1972 COLD
SIMULATED 1972 HDT
9.17 163. tC 6C5.e 1.49 9.98
6.C9 139.87 5E4.9 1.65 10.81
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
•T*
•
CO
593.98
2C56.9
6.16
10.41
CCLO
STAeiL IZEO
GRAMS
27.19
633.C5
24 £6 . <
5.C4
9.61
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
CO
•
>
416.01
ISO C.3
7.32
12.44
HCT
STABILIZER
GRAMS
23.51
576.13
2419.3
5.C3
1C.09
*********************************
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE -EMSSICNS
SPfEO HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 50 CONC 2958 2.82 13.56 1C29
MASS 3.68 7C.29 .541.21 4.4C
13.43
LCW CRUISE 35 CCNC 3167
MASS 2.8t
3.57 13.14 272
71.93 4C3.65 0.81
16.94
IDLE
0 CONC 6533 7.8E 9.49 60
MASS 1.40 38.42 74.83 C.C6
C.CC
CCMPCSITF 28 CONC 3631 3.*8
MASS 2.14 5C.1C
294
1.16
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX, AIRCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
1U7
-------
TEST NUMPER: EC043
CAR NLC6ER: CCC9
BEFORE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN RESLLTS USING
1975 FFDERAL TEST F RCC ECIRE S
YFAR MAKE MODEL CYL CtD BBL ODCMR LNRT RDI-P A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 CHEV C-1C 8 350 4 12707 4CGC 12.C N Is AI Y S-4
GRANS PFR ^ILE HC CO CC2 NOX NPG
1975 COMPOS ITF 6.35 73.42 526. 5 2.66 13.45
SIMULATED 1972 CCIC 7.29 89.87 542.2 2.62 12.59
SIMULATED 1972 HOT 5.64 61.Ce 513.E 2.69 14.19
CCLD TRANSIENT CRAMS 31.30 417.37 1SCC.2 12.12 12.24
CCLD STA61LIZFD GR AMS 23.37 256.62 2 174.C 7.54 12.93
HOT TRANSIENT GRA*S 18.94 201.OC 1679 .7 12.67 15.82
HCT STABILIZEC GRAMS 22.4C 245.26 2131.E 8.14 13.25
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MODE EMISSICNS
SPFFD HC CO C02 NCX MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 1167 0.25 13.76 1492
MASS 1.34 7.91 S5C.35 6.C4 15.71
LCVi CRUISE 33 CCNC 2437 C.9C 14.14 573
MASS 2.C9 22.24 42C.43 1.62 19.28
IDLE 0 CONC 8688 2.74 9.97 42
MASS 1.09 7.26 41.26 C.C5 O.OC
CCMPCSITE 27 CCNC 2670 0.76 455
MASS 1.25 S.C7 1.60
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES? INC.
19900 F. CCLFAX, ALRORA, CCLC. 8CC11
1U8
-------
TEST NUMBER: E005C
CAP MKeER: 0CC9
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS USING
1*575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CIC B8L CDOMR INRT RChF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 CHFV C-1C 8 350 4 128C5 4CCC 12.C N N AI Y S-4
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC
5.65
CO
79.1C
CC2
553.t
NCX
2.C4
MPG
12. 8C
SIMULATEC 1972 CCLC 6.73
SIMULATED 1972 HOT 4.83
95.49 566.6 2.C5 12.03
66.73 542.3 2.C3 13.44
CCLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 3C.96
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 19.53
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 16.69
HOT STABILIZED GRAVS 19.52
445.5C ie9C.l e.86 12.09
27C.66 2374.7 6.52 11.96
229.8C 1692.2 6.74 15.43
291.46 2134.9 5.65 12.92
*********************************
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSIONS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC 1984 C.73 14.14 1743
MASS 2.3C 19.42 . 531.49 6.55
15.64
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3098 C.98 12.72 797
MASS 2.75 24.42 396.32 2.17
2C.C8
IOLF
o ccnc 86en 4.39 ic.55 • 60
MASS 0.81 17.62 68.07 0.C6
C.OC
COMPOSITE
?7 CONC
MASS
3322
l.?9
1.39
18.82
572
1.90
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA ACRATCR I ES, INC.
1990C F. COLFAX, ALRCfiA, CCLC. 3C011
1U9
-------
TFST NUMBER: ECC44
CAR NUMEER: 0C10
BEFORE
OYNAMQMETER EMISSICN RESLLTS LSirvG
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECURFS
YEAR MAKE MCTFL CYL CIC ePL CCCMR INST R CH F A/C EVP EXK PCV TRANS
1969 CHFV NOVA 8 350 2 32731 3CCC 1C.3 N N AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC 2
NCX
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.83
106.44
473.8
3.53
13. 5C
SIMULATED 1*572
CCLC
7.65
125.06
485.8
3.26
i2.ee
SI^ULATEC 1^7?
HPT
4.46
92.39
414 . 7
3.73
14.27
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
37.31
523.84
itce.5
11.C6
12.75
CDLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
20.C7
414.1C
2C35.C
13.36
12.47
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
.13.3=
278.85
145C.2
14.64
16.84
HCT STABILIZEC
GRAMS
lfl.CS
374.53
lecc.t
13.69
14.C2 .
«****»«*
« « *
* * * *
~ * 4 4
4**4
4 * 4 « *
* * * * *
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEED
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45
CCNC
3404
2.56
14. ce
2247
MASS
3.14
57.72
447.17
7. CI
16.26
LOW C.UISE 30
CCNC
4C99
3.2C
13.56
1453
PASS
3.06
56.43
3.3 6.54
3.34
2C.4E
IDLE 0
CCNC
5907
5.93
11.54
96
MASS
I .02
23.CE
64.99
C.C6
C.OC
COMPOSITE 25
CCNC
39 3 3
2.13
663
MASS
1.77
35.44
2.20
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRfTCBIES
19900 E. COLFAX, AURORA, CCLC. ;
, INC.
SCC11
150
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC49
CAR NUM8ER s 0C10
AFTER
OYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESULTS USING
1575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YE«R MAKE MCDEL CYL CID BBL CCCMR INRT KChF tfC EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 CHEV NCVA 8 350 2 32739 30CC 1C.3 N N AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1ST; COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
4.59 76.C4 474.A 3.30 14.64
SIMULATED 1572 COLO
SIfULATEC 1972 HCT
6.55 99.93 4e2.4 3.C9 13.49
3.11 58.02 46E.4 3.45 15.64
CCLO TRANSIENT GRIPS 35.90 482.69 U27.fi 11.11 13.CC
CCLD STARIL IZEC GRAMS 13.22 2tt.lt 1 «9C.2 12.C< 13.99
HOT TRANSIENT GR APS IC.14 lte.37 1522.9 13.83 17.87
HCT STAeiLIZEC C-P.AMS 12.18 22C.21 ie74.2 11.69 15.18
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 3073 2.C5 13.17 2146
MASS 2.e6 47.79 4C8.44 6.49 16.Ce
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 3132 2.C2 12.67 1261
MASS 2.44 33.IE 329.68 2.22
22.86
IDLE
0 CCNC 2889 2.83 11.95 157
MASS 0.71 12.43 89.63 C.13
C.CC
CCMPCSITE 25 CCNC 3046 2.C9
MASS 1.44 23.5S
818
2.1C
AUTOMCTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCRIES, INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, AlRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
151
-------
TEST NLM6ER: ECC47
CAR MMEER: CCll
eEFCRF
DYNAMOMETER emission results using
1575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YFAR MAKE NCI)EL CYL CIC BEL CCCMR INRT PCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1971 FCRO PINTO 4 122 2 71C3 225C 6.8 N Y AI Y S-4
GRAMS PER MILE
I<375 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
8.S5 ICC.66 24C .2 1.28 2C.87
SIMULATEC 1972 CDLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
10.13 11C. .14 24C.2 1.1? 19.
e.C6 S3.5? 24C.1 1.31 21.56
CCLO TRANSIENT GRA"S 39.62 112.55 £26.6 4.56 2C.31
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 36.37 413.52 S74.S 4.34 IS.71
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 24.06 287. ^7 625.8 5. e 5 24.OC
HOT STABILIZE!: GRAMS 34.28 4C1.23 929 .4 3.eC 2C.55
«*«««*»**«****#
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPFED HC CC CC2 NGX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CONC
MASS
4864
3.C6 12.86
2.68 104.33 264.33
1666
3.54
2C.39
LCW CRUISE 23 CONC 7124
MASS 3.C3
7.42 9.74 176
e3.52 163.63 C.3C
2S.23
IDLE
0 CCNC 172C6
MASS 1.C2
8.47 6.33 9
15.6C 21.62 0.C2
0.0C
COMPOSITE 2G CONC 735C 4.37
MASS 1.65 45.34
364
0.67
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LARCRATCR I ES, INC.
199CC E. COLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
152
-------
TEST MJPRER: E0055
CAR M«PER: CC11
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESLLTS ISINC
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YF4R MAKE fCDEL CYL C10 RBI CDC^R INRT ROP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 FORD PINTO 4 122 2 7122 2250 6.8 N V AI Y S-4
GRAPS PER KILE HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
1*575 COMPOSITE 3.e5 59.35 271.8 1.41 23.61
SIMULATED 197? COLO 4.29 65.89 274.6 1.38 22.74
SI HULA TEO 19 72 HOT 3.52 54.41 269,7 1.44 24.31
CCLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 18.3ft 265.73 92C.3 5.58 23.29
CCLO STABILIZED GRAMS 13.81 22e.45 1139.C 4.76 22.24
HOT TRANSIENT GRAfS 12.62 179.63 E83.8 6.C5 26.96
HCT STAEIL I2EC GRAPS 12.62 218.96 1C76 .6 4.73 23.47
ANALYSIS OF KEY-PCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED PC CO CC2 NCX KPG
UGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 4238 1.C9 14.CC 24C1
MASS 2.41 18.68 163.9e 4.4e 44.31
LOU CRUISE 23 CCNC 5038 4.72 11.79 238
MASS 2.34 55.11 21C.e6 C.40 29.21
IDLE 0 CONC 4725 3.06 13. C8 79
MASS 0.53 8.05 51.94 C.C5 C.CC
CCMPCSITE ?0 CCNC 4412 1.79 549
MASS 1.2C 16.41 1.12
AUTC^DTI VP TESTING L AF>.C R AT CR 1E S , INC.
199CC E. CGLFAX, AUP.CRA, CCLC. 9CC11
153
-------
TEST MfBER: ECC4B
CAP MlMfiER! CC12
BE FCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICP^ RESULTS USING
1975 FECEPAL TEST PRCCECliRES
YEAR MAKE NCHEL CYL CIC RRL CCCR INRT RCFP A/C E\
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CDNC 25C6 1.81 14.11 2516
MASS 2.71 '49.1C 521 .69 9.22 14.66
LC> CRUISE 33 CCNC 2430 0.95 14.47 1174
MASS 1 .33 24 .C3 414 .66 3.29 19.49
IDLE
0 CCNC 1516 6.41 1C.79 85
MASS 1.07 38.63 9e.64 C.ll
O.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC
MASS
2664
1.53
2.46
39.65
832
2.72
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCR/TCRIES. INC.
199CC E. COLFAX, AlKCRA, CCLC. 3CCI 1
154
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC54
CAR NUMBER! CC12
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER FM ISS ICN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PPCCtCLRES
YFAR M AK E MCOEL CYl TIC 8RL CCCMR INRT RChP A/C EVP EXK FCV TRANS
1S72 FCRO GALAX 8 <>00 2 10413 4C0C 12.C Y Y AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
HC CO CC2
3.28 54.23 623 .5
3.63
3.C2
CfLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 15.33
COLD STABILIZET GRA«S 11.E6
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 1C.76
HOT STABILIZFC GPAMS 11.63
64.72 644.e
46.31 (CI.A
296.16 2212.7
189.22 2623.6
15E.13 1931.8
179.9C Z£C?.C
NCX
? .25
3.2C
3 . 21
12.77
11.20
13.43
1C.61
KPG
2.36
1.75
2.91
1.9 2
1.59
4.66
2.12
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCCE -EMISSICNS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX
KPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 2193
C.9E 14.23 2247
MASS 2.46 33.59 . 51E.SC t.72
15.37
LOW CRUISE 33 CONC 18C4 C.51 14.47 894
MASS 1.71 9.48 4ie.44 2.45
2C.3C
IDLE
0 CCNC 2541 2.74 13.33 1C6
MASS C.7C 14.33 113.35 C.1C
C.CC
CCMPCS1TE 27 CCNC 2215 1.2C
MASS 1.27 IE.63
713
2.01
AUTGMCTIVF TESTING LAetPtTCR I ES, INC.
19900 E. CXLFAX, HRCRA, CCLC. BCfll
155
-------
TEST NLP6EK: ECC52
CAP MIME EP: OC13
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PROCEDURES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYl CIC PBL CDCMP INRT RCHF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1972 PLYM SATEL 8 318 2 8513 35GC 11.2 N Y EM Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 CCMFOSITE
HC
3.26
CO
67.7C
CC2
S2S.1
NCX
3.26
m PG
13.79
SIMULATED IS72 CCLC 3.65
SIMULATFC IS72 HCT 2.96
8C.62 542 .9 3.C4 13.C8
57.96 51E.6 3.46 14.38
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 16.CC 354.5C 1774.E 13.21 13.64
CCLD STABILIZED GRAMS 11.39 250.12 2296 .E 9.56 12.5E
HCT TRANSIENT GRAMS 10.84 1E4.57 1594.C 16.36 16.95
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 12.78 ' 27C.65 2C46.5 11.98 13.65
ANALYSIS GF KEY-MCDE iMISSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2361 C.95 13.91 2378
MASS 2.39 22.94 464.45 7.91
17.53
LOW CRUISF 3C CONC 2778
1.36 14. C3 1261
MASS 2.19 159.3C 146.CC 3.C2
22. C9
IDLE
0 CCNC 4064 5.26 11.16. 83
MASS C.77 24.65 e6.54 C.C6
C.OC
COMPOSITE 25 CONC 2715 1.73
MASS 1.33 39.C3
829
2.35
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
199CC E.. COLFAX, KKCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
156
-------
TEST KLCPEfi: E0C61
CAP NLMeER: CC13
AFTER
OYNAMCMETEP EMISSICN PESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE KCOFL CYL CIT BeL CCCMP INRT PCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1972 PLYM SATAL 8 318 2 8539 35CC 11.2 N Y Ef Y A
GRAMS PER ^ILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NC> MPG
2.86 60.14 545.C 2.03 13.73
SIMULATED 1972 COLC 3.It
SIMUL A TEC 1972 HCT 2.64
67.93 563.3 2.C2 13.1C
54.26 531.2 2.C5 14.25
COLO TRANSIENT ORJMS 13.C7 266.43 1936.1 8.24 13.39
CCLO ST AG 1LIZFC GRAMS 10.61 223.CI 2266 .6 6.68 12.83
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS . 9.21 183.97 16S5.7 8.46 16.14
HOT STABILI ZEC GRAMS 10.42 241 .6C 2173.C 6.29 13.26
«***« *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE 6MISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
KPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CONC 2037 1.16 13.76 11C6
MASS 2.23 41.76 485.65 3.95
15.95
LCH CRUISE 30 CCNC 24C2
MASS 1.91
C.9E 14.CC 676
21.14 365.5C 1.68
22.00
IDLE
0 CCNC 2889 4.29 11.66 77
MASS 0.60 19.62 85.e6 C.C6
O.OC
CCMPHSITF 25 CCNC 223C 1.65
MASS 1.16 25.35
427
1.22
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING L A RC<> A TCP I ES . INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALKCP A » CCLC. 8C011
157
-------
TEST MJCBERs ECC53
CAR NUMBER: CC14
fiEFCPE
DVNAMOMETFR EMISSICN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YFAR MAKE MCDEL CVL CIC BPL CCCMR INBT RCFP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 PCNT CATAL H 400 2 75644 4000 12.C V N EM v *
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMPCSITE
HC CO CC2
5.21 ec.5f 511.e
NCX MPG
3.77 12.es
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
6.29 ICO. 6 3 561. A 3.5 2 12.04
1.39 65.16 521.3 3.96 13.62
CCLO TRANSIENT GRA«S 28.93 496.4C 195S.1 12.CI 11.16
COLO STABILIZED GRAMS ie.2fc 258.3C 2251.2 11 .36 12.63
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 11.61 232.67 1778.2 15.36 11.61
HOT STAfMLIZEC GRAMS 17.51 219.07 2227.2 11.11 13.05
ANALYSIS OF KEV-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
M PG
UGH CRUISE 19 CONC 2280
MASS 2.71
C.13 11.CC 2711
11.13 519.11 9.66
16.31
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3508
MASS 3.29
1.29 13.79 17e3
21.33 387.27 4.EE
2C.43
IDLE
0 CONC
MASS
3 5 7 e
0.83
2.7C
12.86
12.45
92.73
1C5
C.C9
o.oc
COMPOSITE 77 CCNC 2646 C.92
MASS 1.55 13.76
1045
2. c e
AUTCMCTIVF TESTING L#PCPATCP IES, INC.
19900 F. COLFAX, flRCFA, CCLC. SCC11
158
-------
TEST MlNBER: ECCfcO
CAR NLMEER s CC14
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESILTS ISINC
1975 FFOERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CIC PPL COCfO INpT PChF A/C EVP EXh FCV TPANS
1969 PCNT CATAl 8 <.00 2 75671 4CCC 12.C Y N £M Y A
GRAPS PEP MLE
t-C
CC
CC 2
NCX
KPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.22
66.83
579.8
3.65
12.7C
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
6.64
92.55
591.3
3.23
11.75
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
4.15
47.43
571.2
3.97
13.52
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
32.94
529.21
1965.3
9.72
11.2C
CCLC STABILIZED GRAMS
16.82
164.ee
2469.1
14.52
12.33
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.33
190.82
1815.C
15.26
15.05
HOT STABILIZED GPA*S
16.01
122.46
247C.5
14.84
12.64
4 * 4 4 4 4 4
4*4#
4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4. 4
4 4 4 4 4
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-NCDE
-EMSSICNS
SPEEH
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
2430
0.47
14.22
2935
MASS
2.91
11.68
537.62
1 C .69
15.76
LCW CRUISE 33
CONC
3473
1 .CC
13.76
1821
MASS
3.C4
25.99
3es.95
4.84
20.22
IDLE 0
CONC
2743
c.ee
13.42
162
MASS
C. 63
5.82
1C6.89
C.12
O.CC
COMPOSITE 27
CCNC
2598
C.57
1122
MA 5 S
1.46
9.51
3.33
AliTOMCT I VE TESTING L ARC P < TC R"I E S
19900 E. COLFAX, ALPCRA, CCLC.
, INC.
accn
159
-------
TEST NtPEERt EC058
CAR hL^GER: 0C15
E E FORE
DYNAMOMETER EPISSICN RESULTS CSINC
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECtRES
YEAR PAKE PODEL CYL CIO BEU CRCPR INRT RChF A/C EVP F XH PCV TRANS
1968 CHEV I f PAL 8 327 4 46C72 4C00 12. C Y N E P Y A
GRAPS PER NILE
1975 COPFOSITF
K CC CC2 NCX PPG
5.21 SC.At 552. C 3.<57 13.73
SIMULATED 19 7? COLC
SIPLLATEO 1972 HCT
5.33 52.79 573.9
5.12 43.69 537.2
4.16 13.22
3.83 14.14
COLD TPAN SI EAT GRANS 21.26 240.68 2C66.9 18.15 12. 94
CCLO STARILIZEC CRAPS 18.73 155.25 2237.3 13.C8 13.5C
HOT TRANSIENT GR APS . 19.64 2C9.96 1791.6 15.62 14.89
HCT STAEILIZEC GRAPS 19.77 21C.84 2 U4.E 1C.C4 13.67
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCDE EPISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3195 C.7Z 13.65 2672
PASS 4.C6 2C.91 54E.73 1C.87 14.9E
LOW CRUISE 33 CONC 4760
2.13 13.14 1261
MASS 4.29 46.eE 4CC.3C 3.7e ie.27
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
3056
0.55
C.52 13.65
1.36 76.4 6
ice
C.C8
O.OC
CCMPO SITE 27 CGNC 333ft C.eC
MASS 1.83 11.26
895
3. 16
AUTCPCTIVE TESTING L AH'C.R ATCR I E S, INC.
19900 E . r.CLFAX, A L P-C R A .t CCLC. 8CC 11
160
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC67
CtK NUMEER! 0C15
AFTER
CYN4MCMETEP EMISSION RESILTS LSING
1975 FECEPAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR " AK E VCCEl TYL CIC EEL CCCfR 1NRT RCHP i/C EVP EXH PCV TPANS
1968 C HE V [MPAL 8 327 4 46C91 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2
5.84 101.32 539.1
NCX PPG
2.51 12.42
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SI ~'ULATEC 197? t-CT
6.22 IC6.84 556.5
5.56 97.15 525.6
2.57 11.96
2.45 12.EC
COLD TRANSIENT GRA"S 24.77 405.75 1972.1 11.66 12.C9
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 21 . 85 395. 55 22C4.9 7.65 11.e4
HOT TRANSIENT GPAMS 19.e6 333.C9 1727.3 1C.75 .12.99
HOT STABILIZED GRANS 20.63 278.2C 2C99.7 6.47 12.42
ANALYSIS CF KEY-KCDE EMSSICNS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3473 1.42 13.62 2115
MASS 3.88 23.2< . *69.49 7. 16
16.68
LCW CRUISE 22 CCNC 521? 3.9C 11.92 593
MASS 4.59 7C.15 255.77 1.66
16.52
IOLE
0 CONC 5559 6.C9 1C.24 77
MASS I.C6 22.74 68.47 C.C8
C.CC
CCNPCSITE 27 CCNC
MASS
4C37 2.47
2.13 21.23
592
1.96
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCRIFSt INC.
199CC E.. COLFAX, ALP.CR/s, CCLC. «CCU
161
-------
TEST NUM e ER' ECC59
CAR MfEEP: CC16
E E FORE
CYNAMOMETEP FffSSICN RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCEDLRES
YEAR MAKE MCPEL CYL CIC RBL CCCMR I NRT POP A/C EVP EXt- FGV TPANS
1970 ChEV CAPRI 8 400 2 3255? 4CCG 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP f ILE l-C CC CC2 NCX f>PG
19 75 CCMPOSITF 5.41 74.CE 526.7 3.65 13.-44
S I Ml)L AT F D I'D 72 COLC 6.9C 99.31 534.7 3 . It 12.5C
SIMULATEC 197? HCT 4.29 55.C4 52C.7 4*G2 14.35
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
34.C3
513.96
18C9.2 1C.23
11.52
CCLD
STABILIZED
GRAMS
1 7.7C
23C.e£
2?CC.7 13.51
13.C9
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.48
iei.95
17C4.4 16.66
15.97
HOT
STABILIZED
GRAP'S
16.15
167.7 1
2175.5 14.G8
13.77
» * *
~ * $ ~' *
« * «
* 4 * $
« » 4 4
~ * * *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-^CCE. E> ISSICNS
SPEEC . HC GG CC2 NGX CFG
HIGH GRUISE 49 C.ONC 3219' 2.43! 1:3.08 2C5 3
MASS 3.60 ft 2.3! 489.45 7.39 14.87
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3028 C.66 14.23 1781'
MASS 2.76 1C.87 4Cl.e6 4.E4 2CV82'
IDLE 0 CCNC 33C6 1.23 2.25 74
MASS C.58 4.4 3 65.17 0.C5 C.CC
CCMFCSITE 27 CCNC 3215 1.89 9C8
MASS l1. 5 8 19.68. 2 .53
AUTCMOT IVE TESTING L AB CRAT'C PIES. INC..
1990C E. COLFAX, AtRCRA, CCLC . 9CC11
162
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC66
CAP NLMEEP: CC16
AFTER
OYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS USING
1975 FEflERAL TEST FRfCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MC9FL CYL CIC 6PL CCCNR UiRT RChF t/C FVP EXh PCV TRANS
197C CHEV CAPRI 8 400 2 32575 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PFR MILE
HC
cc
CC2
NGX
f PG
197? COMPOSITE
<1.22
62.24
556 .6
3.33
13.29
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
A.99
83.26
566.1
3.06
12. 5C
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
3.64
46.28
552 .2
2;52
12.97
COLD TRANSIENT GPAMS
22.92
451.23
166C .3
1C.85
12.21
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS
14.54
173.25
2265.2
12. a
12.78
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS
12.79
174.42
1764.1
14.41
15.49
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS
14.33
152.39
2357.6
12.86
12.97
« * * *
~ « ~ *
* * * « 4
* « « *
* 4 • *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSIONS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NC>
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CONC 3122
MASS 2.25
2.66 12.64 ie;9
£6.2 E .4 e1 . ce 5.87
14.<35
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 2611
MASS 2.23
0.37 14.Ce 1878
6.46 4C6.CE 5.18
21. C2
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
302?
C. 65
1.81 13.51
e.74 96.11
1 IS
C. 13
O.OC
COMPOSITE
27 CCNC
MASS
3C58
1.53
2.12
2? .95
918
?.29
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRATCPIESt INC.
1990C F. COLFAX, MPCRfi, CCLC. SC01I
163
-------
IE ST NLMBER: ECC64
CAP NUMBER: 0C17
'BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESULTS USING
1ST5 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE MCDFL CYL C TD 88L CDCMP IhRT ROP */C EVP EX> PCV TRANS
1969 OLDS TCRON 8 455 4 52e67 45CC 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
5.16 £7.11 6 6 £ • 5 2.21 1C.e 4
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATEC 197? HCT
6.39 113.86 teCil 2.10 1C.13
4.24 66.52 655. 7 2.47 11.44
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 32.35
CCLD STAEILIZEC GRAMS 15.55
HOT TRANSIENT GRA*S 16.27
HOT STAR I LI ZED GRAMS 14.30
6 C 8 .21 2252.4
245.7t 2747.5
256.16 22CC.5
176.24 27C2.2
7.14 9.53
E.5 6 1C.77
9.97 12.25
8.49 11.33
> 4 4 4 *44**
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC " 2C83
MASS 2.9 5
1.17 14.59 1434
24.9£ 6,67.44 6.6€
12.17
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 2420 1.42 14i56 72C
MASS 2.61 36 .92 26 6 .IE 2.66
26.79
IDLE
0 CCNC 21C6 0.C9 13.11 54
MASS 0.41 C•61 76.27 C.C5
C.CC
CCMPCSIT E 27 CCNC 2124 C.94
MASS 1.29 13.36
490
2.00
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCR IES , INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, ALPCRA, CCLC. 8CO 11
16U
-------
TEST MNPEB: ECC7C
CAR MPeEP: CC17
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMSSICN RESLITS LSINC
1S75 FEDEPAL TEST PRCCEOLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL C.YL CIC PHI CDCPP INRT PCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRAILS
1969 OLDS TCPGN rt 455 4 52ee5 45CC 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PFR VILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
fPG
19 75 CCMPDSITF
4.49
93.31
661. £
2.24
1C.57
SIMULATED 1572
CCLC
4.9 fi
UC.6S
<56.6
2.C6
1C.C3
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
4.12
ec.i9
669.1
2.38
11.02
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
2C. 83
507.76
2434.fi
7.13
9.86
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
16.55
322.44
28C4.7
e.35
1C.19
HOT TRANSIENT
GR APS
14.36
279.CC
2213.3
9.5C
12.C5
HOT STAEIL1ZEC
GRAMS
13.S5
1 e 2.12
2E88.4
9. 18
10.65
*«**««**
* * *
* « * »
• 4 4 4.4
* * *
4 4 4 * *
~ 4 4 4
ANALYSIS Cf
KEY-MCOE
EMSSICNS
SPEED
K
CC
CC2
KCX
PPG
UGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
2222
1.43
14.44
12C3
MASS
2.SB
42.27 .
647 .3C
5.56
12.32
LCW CRUISE 33
CCNC
2107
1.1C
14.65
747
MASS
2.56
30.21
26 5 .22
2.E3
27.76
IOLE 0
CCNC
l'C6
C.1C
14. Cfi
1C9
MASS
C.49
C .6E
1C7.37
C. 12
C.OC
CCMPC SITE 27
CCNC
2124
I .C£
479
MASS
1.35
14.3<
1.82
AUTCfCTIVE TfiSTIN.G L AP.CP A T CR I E S ,
INC.
1S90C E. COLFAX, ALRCP*. CCLC. 8CC11
165
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC65
CAP MJMEERt 0C16
eEFCRE
OYNAfQMETER EMISSION RESULT'S USING
1S75 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECURES
YEAR HAKE MCCEL CYL CID BRl CCCMP INRT RChF »/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1S6S FCRC HLSTA 0 428 4 31426 350C 11.2 Is N A1 Y A
GRAMS PER HILE HC CC CC2 NCX fPG
1S75 COMPOSITE 6.54 SI.52 573 .2 l.SS 12.Ct
SIVULA TEC 1S72 CCLC 7.74 St.62 575.6 1.S8 11.e4
SIMULATED 1 ^ 72 HOT 5.64 88.37 571.4 2.CC 12.23
CCLC TRANSIENT GRAMS 3 2-5= 34S.91 2C10.3 £.55 12.21
COLD STA0ILIZFC GRAHS 25.43 374.66 23C6.4 6.2S 11.52
HCT TRANSIENT GRAHS 16.67 2E7.8S 1S7S.1 6.71 12.CE
HCT STA0ILI7EC GPAHS 21.C8 353. 5S 227S.5 6.1C 11.62
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE •EflSSICNS
SPEED . HC CC CC2 NCX KPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 1532 2.46 11.56 S52
PASS 2.22 77.62 581.SI 4.8S 12.53
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 1463 1 .6C 1C.77 46C
MASS 1.S2 46.CS 457.S5 1.78 16.6C
IDLE 0 CONC 8862 4.SS S.52 53
MASS 1.S6 21.54 85.51 C.C5 O.CC
CCv PCS IT E 25 CCNC 2859 2 .63 328
MASS 2.C2 38.31 1.44
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA8CRATCR IES» INC.
1990 C F. COL FAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 3CC11
166
-------
TEST MMBER: ECC71
CAR M'PeER: 0018
AFTER
OVN4»»OMETER EMISSION RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPOC ECLRES
YEAR PAKE VCDEL CYL CIC BRL CCCfR INPT Rt>P A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1969 FORO ULSTA e 428 4 3144C 35CC 11.? N N AI Y A
GRAHS PFR PILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE EPISSICKS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
1975 CCMPOSITE
5.61
99.40
62E.C
3.35
11.11
SIMULATED 197? CCLC
6.67
i i7.ee
646.4
3.12
10.44
SIMUL AT EC 1972 HCT
4.ec
65 .46
(14.1
3.53
11.66
COLD TRANSIENT GRAPS
27.77
496.46
2295.5
11.66
1C.26
COLO STASILIZEC GRAPS
22.29
367.46
2552.3
11.75
1C.61
HCT TRANSIENT GRAPS
13.71
253 .6C
2C53.6
14.72
13.C3
HOT S T A BIL I Z E C GRAMS
19.23
•
CM
Pi
2569.3
13.21
1C.87
PPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CCNC ' 1376 2.IS 11.79 1328
mass l.ss 7c.ec sei.se 5.39 13.11
LCK CRUISE 3C CONC 1254
PASS 1.55
1.C4 11.72 74C
37.84 457.4E 2.85
17.07
IDLE
CCNC
MASS
3821
1.34
3.22
IC.43
26.41 131.7?
181
C. 23
C.OC
CCPPGSITE 25 CCNC
MASS
18C8 2.15
i.53 3e.ei
532
1.86
AU T CPC T.I VF TF.STINC LAPCRATCRIESt INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, iLRCRAi CfLC. 8CC11
167
-------
TEST KUfeER: E0C68
CAB MMBER: CC19
EEfCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RFSILTS USING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEA" MAKE rCPEL CYL CIH B3L COtf'R I;NR T RCt-F A/C EVP EXH FC* TRANS
1969 ACMC 440 6 232 1 69119 35CC 11.2 N N EM * A
GRAMS PER HIE
1975 CCMPHSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX WPG
3.98 53.3C 425.2 4.CI 17.07
SIfULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIfULATFC 1972 HCT
4.39 56.36 434.5 4.13 16.59
3.67 5C.SE 4ie.3 3.93 17.46
CGLD TRANSIENT GRAKS t8.87 249.24 15JS.e 15.96 16.16
COLO STABILIZED GRAI-S 14.CS 173.47 16Se.6 15.CC 17.CI
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 13.44 2C8.92 143E.4 14.47 17.57
HCT ST APIL12EC GRAMS 13.89 169.16 1627.9 14.6C 17.69
ANALYSIS CF KEY—"CDE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2778 1.77 13.56 2479
MASS 2.83 40.7S . 426 .33 7.61
17.e3
LOW CRUISE 30 CCNC 3647 1.35 13.56 1621
MASS 2.42 25.£4 314 .13 4.C6
24.57
IDLE
0 CONC 4134 3.IE 12.<52 121
MASS 0.39 6.63 51.74 C.C6
C.CC
CGM PCS IT F 25 CCNC 3117 1.89
MASS 1.23 17.32
1C 19
2.5C
AUTCMCT I VE TESTING L A B CR A T C R I E S , INC.
1
-------
1EST NLMeER: ECC75
CAR MMfiER: OC19
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER Ef ISS IC^ PESLLTS LSING
1975 FFOEPAL TEST FPCCECURES
YEAR PAKE MCDEL CYL CIC fifil CCCKR INRT BCh F A/C EVP E XK PCV TRANS
1969 AM*C 44C 6 232 1 61133 35CC 11.2 N N EM Y A
GRAPS PER MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX PPG
A.25 51.51
-------
TEST MMRER: ECC69
CAR NUME ER! CC20
EEFCRE
DYNAMQ^ETEP EVISSICN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEOERAL TEST FPCCECURES
YEAR MAKE PCPEL CYL CIC BUI CCCMP INPT RCFF A/C EVP FXI- PCV TRANS
1972 CHRY NFInPO 8 4CO 2 1C730 45CC 12.7 Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PER PILE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1-375 CCMFOSITE 6.3C 11«5.7 5 5Ee.C 2.37 11.1?
SIMULATEC 197? CCLC 8.17 131.52 5 S 7.6 2.39 1C.73
SIMULATED 1972 HOT 4.89 11C.87 5EC.E 2.25 11.56
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
41.48
525.51
2C26.4
1C.73
1C.9C
COLD
STABIL I ZE0
GR »MS
19.83
46C.83
2156 .C
7.17
10.57
HCT
TRANSI ENT
GRAFS
16.86
37C.7C
less.6
1C.18
12.82
HOT
STAEIL IZEC
CRAMS
19.98
481.6 3
22??.9
6.52
1C.65
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCOE EMISSICNS
SPEED
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC
MASS
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC
~'ASS
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
KC
3647
1.38
3230
3.53
3821
0.86
CC
CC
2.SC 12.
75.OC 524 .
C.92 11.
47.9? 134.
4.79 11.
21.76 S8.
NO
1520
6.C2
1372
1.15
81
C.C?
MPG
13.5E
17.1C
C.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 363 5 2.EE
MASS 2.C4 39.92
6?e
2.13
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAtfCRATCP I E S» INC.
1990C E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
170
-------
TEST MJfeEP: EC074
CAR MMBEB: CC20
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EK I SS IC^ RESLLTJ LS ING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC BRL CCCMR INRT PCHF A/C EVP E*K PCV TRANS
197? CHRY KE^PC 8 400 2 10748 4500 12.7 Y Y EM V A
GRAMS PFR HUE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.46
127.42
593.8
1.88
1C.98
SIMULATEC 1972
CCLC
6.14
133.83
617.4
1.89
1C.51
STfULATEC 1972
HCT
4.95
122.5£
576.C
1.87
11.36
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
26.30
496 .66
214C.1
e.sfc
10.62
COL0 STAeiLIZEC
GRA"?
19.74
507.C4
24SC.4
5.61
1C. 24
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
17.40
412.33
162S.5
8.4C
12.84
HOT STARILIZFC
GRAMS
19.37
544.13
22 e 5.1
4.91
10.71
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE -Ef ISS ICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CON'C 39S5 4.11 E.C5 e55
MASS 4.EC *55.47 54C.2E 3.66
12.(2
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3752 2.5E 13.11 797
PASS 3. 52 61 .27 445.IS 2.57
16.11
IDLE
0 CCNC 4169 6.14 11.C4 69
MASS C.94 33.61 S6.CE C.C7
C.CC
CCMPCS ITE 27 CCNC 40C1 4.11
MASS 2.21 52.35
410
1.31
AUTCfCTlVE TESTING L A B C ft A T C R I E S , INC.
19900 F. CGL FAX, /H.RCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
171
-------
TEST NUMeEP: ECC72
CAR NLMEER : CC21
EEFCBE
CYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MfPEL CYL CIO fl»L CDCMR INRT RChP A/C EVP EXH FCV TPANS.
1970 LINC CCNTI 8 460 4 20C38 5CCC 12.4 Y N AI Y A
GRAMS PER PILE HC CO CC2 KCX MPG
1975 CCMFOSITE 3.62 fi.lt 742.7 2.29 9.94
SIKULATEC 1972 COLC 4.E7 1C1.33 759.5 2,30 9.53
SIMULATEC 1972 HCT 3.C3 81.C7 729.9 2.29 1C.27
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 25.13 493.95 2634.C 7.74 9.32
CCLD STAEILIZeC GPAVS 11.41 266.CI 3C62.5 9.SC 9.75
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 1 1. 34 34 1 .99 2412.C 7.66 1C.89
HOT STAEILIZEC GRAMS 14.3C 216.7e 3C4S.2 9.9C 9.99
ANALYSIS OF KEY-NCOE EMS5ICNS
SPEEC K CC CC 2 NCX PPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 1045 1 .33 14.32 7C3
MASS 1 . 56 44.5 1 724.1« 3.59 11.15
LOk CRUISE 33 CCNC 523 C.35 13.91 4<*2
MASS C. 74 11.C4 643.C3 2.13 13.44
IDLE C CCNC 2889 2.62 12.59 1C3
MASS 0.81 14.1C 1C E.77 C.1C C.CC
CCPCSITE 27 CCNC 1325 1 .3S 299
MASS 1.01 21.4 C 1.24
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LABCPATCP 1 E5 , INC. .
1990C F. COLFfiX, M.RCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
172
-------
TEST PES: ECC79
CAR MjfE ER : C021
AFTER
CYNAKCMETER EPISSICI\ PESLLTS ISING
1975 FEOERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YFAR MK E ~'CDEL CYL CIC BEL COOP [W
-------
TEST NCMRER: ECC73
CAP MJPeER: CC22
BEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PESLLTS LSINC
1975 FECEPAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC BEL COCNP INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 DATS 510 4 97 2 12449 2?CC <5.1 N N AI Y A
GRAMS PER PILE KC
1975 COMPOSITE B.22
SIMULATEC 1972 COLC 3.63
SI MULATEC 1972 HCT 2.SO
CCLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 15.C3
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 12.23
HOT TRANSIENT GPAMS 9.54
HOT STAPILIZtC GRAMS IC.29
CC CC 2 KC>
33.34 33C.2 3.76
37.85 345 .C 3.75
29.94 319.C 3.7
164.32 131C.S
119.54 1277.1
17
11
1C4.96 1115,2 17
120.C3 1191.5 1C
4***4*4**t***4***«4**4**«*
MPG
22.te
21.41
23.73
2C.11
22. SC
24.61
24.27
******
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE -EMISSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NOX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 2054 0.67 11.41 2C92
MASS 1.78 12.77 361.56 t.Ce
23.CC
LCW CRUISE 23 CCNC 2611
MASS 2.09
2.2? 9.67 fC5
29.62 29C.63 2.99
25.e9
IDLE
C CCNC
MASS
277fl
0.35
C.ll 6.95
0.39 24.77
203
C.C4
C.CC
CCMFCSITE 20 CCNC 2245 C.71
M*SS C.69 6.72
647
1.91
AUTCMCT IVE TESTING LAPCRATCR I ES , INC,
1990C E. COLFAX, iLRCPi, CCLC. HOC 1 I
17U
-------
TEST ' M.PBEP5 ECC78
CAP MMPER: CC22
AFTER
CYNAMRMETER EMSSICN RESLLTS USING
1975 FEOERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR «AKE fCCEL CYL CIC BEL CCCPR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1970 DATS 510 4 97 2 12468 250C 9.4 N N AI Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 CCMFCSITE
HC CO CC2 NOX MPG
2.SO 37.2E 372 .7 3. 16 2C.26
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 19 72 HOT
3.45 45.51 286 .9 3.17 ie.97
1.70 31.C7 361.9 3 . 1 5 21.39
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 19.C3 2C2.C3 13ft.1
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 6.e7 139.31 1515.E
HOT TRANSIENT GRAKS 6.50
15.11
e.t5
93.73 USE.4 15.CI
HOT STABILI ZEC GRA^S 6.C4 127.92 1363.3
e .ce
ie.43
19.52
23.79
21.3e
44444*44*44««44444444444444*4444«
ANALYSIS CF KFY-MCCE EHSSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX
KPG
UGh CRUISE 37 CC1NC 115C
MASS C.91
C.5S ll.tS 15ES
13.C3 37C.59 4.46
22.61
LOK CRUISE 23 CCNC 690 C.9C 1C.24 257
PASS 0.22 16.29 3C2.11 C.63
27.12
IOLE
0 CCNC
MASS
1713
C. 17
1.82 £.66
3.65 37.69
1C 9
C.C9
C.OC
COMPOSITE 2C CCNC 12C3 C.62
MASS 0.37 7.39
416
1.18
AUTr.VQTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRIESt INC.
19«0C F. CCLPAX, ALRCRA. CCLC. 30C11
175
-------
TEST MJMeFR: EC076
can NUMBER: 0C23
EEFCRE
CYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR WAKE MODEL CYL CIC PPL COCMR INRT RCHF A/C EVP FXH PCV TRANS
1970 PL YM SATEL 8 318 2 12922 35CC 11.2 N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1-575 CfMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
<*.01 35.
-------
TEST NUMBER* EC085
CAP NLMEER: CC23
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRE S
YEAR MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC B*L CDC^R INRT RCHF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 PLYM SATFL 8 318 2 12930 350C 11.? N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER FILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC? NCX MPG
3.83 32.1! 56C.4 3.CI 14.29
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC 4.67
SIMULATED 197? HCT 3.18
48.75 581.e 3.C5 13.?3
19.63 544 .2 2.97 15.22
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 22.45 3C8.30 2006.9
CCLO STAEILIZEC GRAMS 12.61 57.24 2356.5
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS ll.?fl
HGT STABILIZED GRAMS 12.61
9C.C2 1725.3
66.14 2266.4
11.C4
11.E5
1C .43
lc.ei
12.69
13.79
17.C9
14.21
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCOE -EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CPU ISE 45 CCNC 3237 1.42 13.42 1318
MASS 3.73 4 5.88 521.5C 5.C9
14.71
LCW CRUISE 20 CCNC 3271
MASS 2.97
C.e2 14.14 875
16.69 426.35 2.43
19.28
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
2228
0.55
C . 16 13.51
C.81 94.4C
164
C. 12
C.CC
CCMPCSITE 25 CCNC 3057 1.C6
MASS 1.62 13.87
560
1.65
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCRIES , INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AIRCPA, CCLC. SCC11
177
-------
TEST NLMBER: ECC77
CAR MMeER: CC24
6EFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESLLTJ ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCEDLRES
YEAP MAKE KCDEL CYL CID eel CDCMP INRT RChP A/C FVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 FORO LTD B 390 2 35655 4CC0 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILF
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO C02 NCX MPG
5.20 74. 5C 5 3 3.3 5.C3 13.36
SIMULATED 19 7? CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
5.e7 78.36 545.i 4.93 12.96
4.69 71.5e 524.1 5.10 13.67
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 24.7C 266.55 1879.5 19.72 13.68
CCLD STAEILIZEC GRAMS 19.32 321.17 2211.8 17.28 12.34
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 15.83 215.66 1718.9 21.CC 15.42
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 17.75 267.22 21C2.3 17.87 13.29
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCOE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CG CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 4 9 CCNC 316 1
MASS 3.70
1.43 13.e5 3152
35.76 518.96 11.28
15.18
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC
MASS
3300
1.36 14.14
2.84 24.26 41C.8S
2C15
5.18
19.44
IDLE
0 CCNC 5246 5.16 11.66 96
MASS 0.89 19.27 79.11 C.15
O.OC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 3555 2.C3
MASS 1.82 23.96
1187
3.54
ALTCMPTIVE TESTING LA0CPATCP IES, INC.
199CC E. CflLFiX, ALRCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
178
-------
TEST MJP8ER: ECCB4
CAR M,feEP: CC24
AFTER
DYnirtCFTE' P«IS51C* PESLL1S LSUG
19TS FEOfRiL TES1 FPCCECLRES
rF« FAKE fCDEL CYL CJC *eL COC^P rMl! PCHP iVC EV» PCV rfli\S
1569 FORC ITC 9 310 i J5t7t 4CCC li-C * K - F.r 1 A
CRAMS PER f]LP
HC
cc
CC 2
MIX
*PG
CCC.FDSTTF.
4.81
7S.0 1
557.^
3.43
\i .ec
SIVtiLATfC 1S72 CCIC
5.73
•Jb.21
57C.E
3-14
12.C2
SIfULATF.C 1S72 HCJ
4.11
64,27
546.1
3.t4
13.45
COLO TRANS 1 EM GRAMS
26.53
462 .6C
1
-------
TEST M'MeER: ECC82
CAP MHEEP: CC25
eEFCflE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PESLLTS LSINO
1975 FECERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CID BUL CDCMR 1NRT RChF A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1970 PCNT CATAl 8 400 2 17070 5C0C 13.4 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP PILE
1975 CCMPO SITE
K CO CC2 NCX MPG
4.29 tl.lt 615.4 4.C9 12.11
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
5.CI 79.7E 634.4 3.63 11.45
3.75 58.69 599.5 4.45 12.66
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 21.10 310.20 2267.7 12.94 11.52
COLC STABILIZEC GR AMS 16.46 288.12 25C5.1 14.26 11.39
HOT TRANS I FN T GRAMS 11.7C 152.02 1991. 1 19.C8 14.34
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 16.88 274.42 2462.7 14.41 11.63
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCOE -EMSSICNS
SPFED HC ' CC CC2 KCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 1104 0.16 13.19 1527
MASS C .98 3.87 594.1C 7.C3
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC
MASS
IDLE
0 CO N'C
MASS
1595
1.5C
5733
C. 95
C.84 13.6
19.7C 419.7
5. C 1 1C. 7
18.1C 71.1
1633
4.44
1C9
C.10
14.76
19.55
O.OC
CCMFOSITE 27 CCNC 1999 1.11
MASS l.Cl 14.7C
784
2.41
AUTC^CTIVC TESTING LARCRATCR IES, INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AlP.CKA, CCLC. 3CC11
180
-------
TEST M>BEP: ECC89
CAR NLM0ER: CC25
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TtST PRCCECURES
YEAR make MCOEL CYL CIC BBL TDCMR INST RCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1970 PONT CATAL 8 400 2 17093 5000 13.A Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMPPSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
5.16 -61.96 54C.5 5.4C 13.61
SIMULATED 197? CCLC 5.65
SIMULATFC 1 ? 72 HOT 4.EC
74.5C «57.7 5.1C 12.84
52.49 527 .5 5.63 14.25
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
21.43
293.17
2C19.3
2C.1C
12.84
COLO
STARILIZEO
GRAMS
?C. 9 3
275.55
2163.5
10.14
12.8e
HCT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.C8
118.16
1792.5
24.C5
16.C5
HOT
STABILIZED
GRAMS
21.53
261.45
2C93.6
19.99
13.33
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSIONS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NGX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 1621
MASS 2.00
C.35 13. C3 2734
3.47 522.18 1C.65
16.6e
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 27C8
MASS 2.66
C.92 13.39 2363
19.14 419.
-------
TEST NLMRER: ECC83
CAR NUMEEP: 0C26
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESLLTS LSINC
1S75 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECURES
YEAR CAKE MCDEL CYl CIC BEL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1970 OLDS VISTA 8 350 4 50224 45CC 12.7 Y N AI Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
I"575 CCMFPSITE
HC CC CC2 NOX MPG
5.29 95.16 517.8 2.22 13.C2
SI MUL A TEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
6.C8 106.87 53C.9 2.C3 12.AC
4.69 £6.37 sce.c 2.3t 13.52
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 27.33 442.33 1649.1 7.55 12.36
CCLD STAE1LIZEC GRAMS 18.27 359.2C 2132.4 7.68 12.45
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 16.92 288.55 1677.5 1C.C4 14.8E
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 17.26 317.32 2112.1 7.e0 12.e6
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCOE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NO
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3404
1.89 13.28 1744
MASS 3.64 47.88 476.42 6.23
15.76
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 416S
MASS 3.57
2.2C 12.78 967
4C.C7 383.E7 2.50
19.44
IDLE
0 CCNC 11C9 5.16 9.36 62
MASS 0.7C 17.91 61.15 C.C6
C.OC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 3067 2.42
MASS 1.75 27.87
6 2C
1.88
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING L AB CR A-TC P IE S, INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, ALRCPA, CCLC. 3CC11
182
-------
TEST NUMBER: ECC88
CAR NUMBER! CC26
AFTER
CYNA^OMETER. FHISSICt> PESLLTS USING
1975 FECERAL TEST PPCCEOLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL COOMR INRT RChP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 OLOS VISTA 8 350 4 5C245 45C0 12.7 Y N AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE HC CO CC2 KOX MPG
1975 CCHPOSITE
u
•
in
76.C6
5C7.2
2 - 85
13.86
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
5.96
92.49
521.4
2.66
12.99
SI ML'L A TEC 1972
HOT
4.34
63.66
496.4
2.99
14.6C
COLO TRANS IFNT
GRAMS
27.C4
431.24
iec'5.6
1C.20
12.65
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
17.69
262.41
21C5.1
9.73
13.32
HOT TRANSIENT
GR AWS
14.65
215.16
1611.6
12.73
16.23
HOT STABILIZED
CRAMS
15.E4
19S. 17
2C17.9
1C.61
14.44
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCG EMISJICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NC*
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3578
MASS 3.7C
1.94 13.56 1961
41.12 464.37 6.62
16.47
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 4e64
PASS 3.40
1. e 7 13.36 13 5 7
35.3C 3T3.2C 3.57
2C.27
I OLE
0 CCNC 3473 2.60 11.92 76
MASS. 0,32 5.66 39.94 C.C4
C.CC
CCNPCSITE 27 CCNC 3695 1.56
MASS 1.5C 17.63
774
2.14
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAHCRATCRIES . INC.
199C0 E. COLFAX, 4LRCR/i, CCLC. 8CC11
183
-------
TEST MCPER: ECC86
CAR MJNEER: 0027
BEFCRE
OYNAMOMETEH EMISSION RESULTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CVL CIC PPL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXh PC\i TRANS
1971 FCRC MAVER t 200 1 162C9 275C 9.9 N Y EM Y A
GRAMS PFR MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMPCSITE
2.8C
24.19
411.5
s.es
19.43
SIMULATED 197?
CCLC
3.14
28.15
425.7
5.92
18.56
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
2.54
21.2C
4GC.7
5.EE
2C.15
COLO TRASS I ENT
GRAMS
13.15
lit.52
1*34.1
23.57
ie.48
CCLO STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
10.42
-------
TEST MIPCER: ECC<) MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF 2.34 19.CE 3E3.C 4.«C 21.15
SIMULATED 19 72 CCLC 2.59 21.27 399.1 4.£C 2C.21
SIMULATED 1972 HCT 2.15 17.44 37C.E 4.46 21.99
cclo
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
10.67
75.44
1417.0
19.88
2C.71
COLD
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
e.77
e4.o;
1576.1
lt.1 1
19.75
HOT
TRANS!ENT
GRAMS
7.33
46.73
12C4.9
17.32
24.9e
HOT
STAPIL IZEC
GRAMS
e. 16
71.26
1555.7
14.47
20.25
ANALYSIS CF KEY-KCOE EMISSIONS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NCX
NPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CONC 2691
MASS 2.21
C.19 13.85 4142
2.21 3fC.ee 9.84
23.9E
LCW CRUISE 23 CCNC 19C8 C.1C 14.14 5f3
MASS 1.25 C.7C 3 C £.3C 1.2C
28.tC
IDLE
C CC1NC
MASS
2732
0.C1
3.57 12.U
9.04 t C . 20
1C2
C.C6
o.cc
COMPOSITE 20 CCNC 2615 0.76
MfiSS C.72 6.41
9eo
2.4e
AUTCVCTIVE TESTINC LAPTPATCP I ES, INC.
1990C E. CGLFAX, filRfoi, CCLC. 0CC11
185
-------
TEST NLMPER: ECC87
CAP NL"EEPs 0C28
eEFCRE
DVNAMGMETEP FMISSICN RESLLTS LSING
1*375 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR HAKE MCDFL CYL CIC BBL CDCMP INRT RCFF A/C EVP EXh FCV TRANS
i<571 CHEV NCVA 6 250 1 15462 35CC 11.2 N Y E M 1 A
GRAMS PER NILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NC* PPG
3.42 39.50 451.1 3.67 16.99
SIMULATED 1972 COLC
SIMULATFC 1972 HCT
4.60 63 .6C 451.5 3.52 15.73
2.54 21 .32 45C.E 4.14 16.C9
CCLD TRANSIFNT GRA^S 24.73 39C.24 1533.C 13.8C
CPLO STAEILIZEC GRAMS 9.77
HCT TRANSIENT GRAPS 9.25
HCT STARILI ZFC ORAfS 9.93
et.ec i e 5 2. e 12.ti
73.11 1527.5 ie.42
59 .35 1 7 5 f . 7 12.45
14.61
It.97
19.45
18.2C
44444444*444444*4444444«44*4«4**4
ANALYSIS CF KEY-WCCE FMSSICNS
SPEEC hC CC CC 2 NC>
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CGNC 1675
MASS 1.76
C.15 14.14
2 . 5fc 465. 1 1
2595
e.35
16.76
LOW CRUISE 3C CCNC 2889 0.51 14.44 2C61
MASS 2.16 6.15 332.34 4.42
ICLE
0 CCNC
MASS
4864
C.5C
4.91
10.15
11.46
39.19
,ec
C.C5
0.00
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 23e4 I.C5
MASS C.99 7.81
1C89
2.68
AUTCMCT1VE TESTING LAHCRATTP I ES, INC,
199CC E. COLFAX, A L P C R 4 » CCLC. flCC 1 1
186
-------
TEST REP : ECC98
CAP NUMBER: OC?0
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESUTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
VFiR MAKE MCDEL CVL CIC BeL CDC*P IKRT ROP A/C EVP E>H PCV TRANS
1971 CHFV NOVA fc ?50 1 155C3 35CC 11.2 N V EM V A
GRAMS PER KILE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMFCSITE
2.91
23.IS
4Si.t
2.C6
15.92
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
4.07
57.7C
iC4.6
2.77
14.64
SIMULATED 15 72
HPT
2.C3
14.7C
<92.3
3.26
17.C7
CCLO TRANSIFNT
GRAMS
22.83
375.49
173C.1
1C.65
13.59
COLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
7.72
57.26
2C54.6
9.SI
15.61
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
7.51
52.94
1417.2
14.73
16.64
HOT STABILIZED
GP A" $
5.91
57.64
2C29.2
1C.12
16.C2
«*»»»«**
* « ~
~ ~ * *
~ * » 4
* * » « *
* * * *
« * * * «
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCOE E^'ISSIC^S
SPPEO HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CONC 1356 C.24 14.41 1876
HASS 1.44 5.71 «e9.32 «»24 17.71
LOW CRUISE 30 CONC 2861 C.6C 14.41 1569
MASS 2.03 13.22 333.C5 3.26 24.72
I01.E 0 CONr: 366? 3.15 12. TC 79
•wa:-. i :.'¦*? !i.\l 52.44 C.C5 c.cc
TMPCSITE ,>* Of 1941 0.e2 618
MASS C.64 8.11 2.00
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L/BCPATCP IES t INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, aRORA, CCLC. 8C011
187
-------
TEST NLM8ER: ECC9C
CAR NUKEFR: 0C29
BEFORE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS ISING
1-9 75 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECIRES
YFAP MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC BEL CDCMP INRT PChP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 VOLK SECAN
-------
TEST NLMeEP: EC106
CAR MMeER: CC29
AF T ER
OYNAMQMETER EMISSION PESLLTS USING .
1975 FECEPAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE NCCEL CYL TIC PPL CCCMP INRT POP A/C EVP E XH PCV TRANS
1970 VOLK SEDAN 4 97 1 27E2C 2CCC e.3 N N EM Y S-4
GRAMS PER PILE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMFGSITE
2.78
38.04
3C8.5
3 .CC
23.62
SIMULATEC 1«72
CCLC
3.CO
14.72
3Ce.£
3.C7
22.92
SIMUL AT EC 1972
HCT
2.(-2
33.CC
3Ce.3
2.95
24.17
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
12.16
217.62
992.6
11.37
2 3.67
CCLC STARIL I 2EC
GRAMS
1C.37
117.77
1322.7
11. 66
22.24
HOT TRANSIENT
GUAMS
9.26
129.7C
988.5
1C.48
26.61
HOT STABILIZEC
GRAMS
11.38
127.Ct
14 92.1
1C .46
19.84
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE -EKISSICNS
SPEED . HC CC CC2 NGX
MPG
KIGH CRUISF 37 CONC 1671
MASS 1.C9
C.9f 13.73 4528
1A.93 .2£2.ti 8.C9
26.76
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 1619
MASS C.8C
C .78 13.82 1125
1C.39 217-C 5 l.tC
37.75
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
2854
0.27
2.35 12.
4,78 38 .85
67
0 .05
O.OC
COMPOSITE 2C CCNC 18 81 I.It
MASS C. 54 7.95
1187
2.15
8UTCNCT !VE TEST INC L4RCRtTCR IES, INC.
1990C E. CCLfSX, M.Krp«, CCLC. 80C11
189
-------
IES1 NL^REP: ECIOO
CAR NLfEER: CC3G
0EFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS ISINC
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR M AK E PCCEL CYL CID PBL CCCMR INRT RChP A/C FVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 TGYC CCPCl A 712 28311 25CC 9.4 Y Y AI Y S-4
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
A-27 46.23 264.C 2.12 25.43
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC 4.24
SIMULATEC 1972 HCT 4.29
49.24 269.5 2.C9 24.72
43.97 259.9 2.14 2t.CC
CCLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.C7
191.73
957.8
7.93
24.94
COLD
STABILIZEC
GRAMS
17.74
177.55
1C63.5
7.73
24.51
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.44
152.2C
ee5.6
8.29
27.77
HOT
STA6ILI2EC
GRAMS
20. C3
171.e7
1C 16.2
£.21
25.4C
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EPISSICKS
SPEEG HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC " 2367
C.67 11.36 24C1
MASS 1.87 12. 13 .279.72
.29 29.23
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 33C6
MASS 1.80
3. f 4 e . 2 E 161
44.6C 162. CC C.33
37.4!
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
10774
C.46
2.9C 7.66
2.84 13. EC
43
C.C1
C.CC
COMPOS ITF 20 CCNC 3997 1.39
MASS C.96 9.77
512
1.27
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L A«?C P «TCP IES » INC.
199CC F. CCIFAX, /(LHCR«, CCLC. gCCll
190
-------
16£ I NLPBERs EC 10'
CAR NUMPER: CC30
AFTER
CYNAPOMETEP EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MKE KCOEL CYL CIC PPL CCCMJ INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 TCYC CGPCL 4 71 2 2832e 25CC 5.4 Y Y AI Y S-4
CRAMS PER HILF
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
ypc
1975 CCMFCS1TE
3.28
42.77
2C2
e
2.24
22.25
SIPULATEC 1972
CCLC
3.43
50.47
2C7
3
3.11
22.4C
SIMULATED 157?
HOT
3.17
36.55
3C1
1
3.33
24.12
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.11
237.16
1C33
C
C.22
'o
*T
•
(M
COLD STABILI2EC
GRAMS
12.59
141.37
1272
1
3.13
22.35
KOT TRANSIENT
GRAfS
11.20
135.76
585
5
1.67
26.22
HOT STA8ILIZEC
GRANS
12.60
145.C7
1297
2
2.67 ,
21.82
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-CCCE
EC I
SIGN
SPEEO
HC
CC
CC
NCX
PPG
UGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
2402
0.41
11.
£
2368
MASS
i.ee
6.92
273 .
7
7.57
30.71
LOV CRUISE 23
CCNC
33C6
3.15
7.
6
460
MASS
2.16
46.74
154.
C. 58
32.4C
IDLE 0
CCNC
13 51
G.4C
8.
1
65
MASS
C. 16
1.C4
25. 2C
0.C3
C.OC
COMPOSITE 20
ccnc
23C7
C.6E
787
MASS
0.81
7.54
1.51
AIJTCMCTIVE TESTING L ADC P t TCR IE S . INC.
1S9CC F. COLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 80C11
191
-------
TEST MMPEP: EC103
CAR MJ^etR: CC31
EEFORE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCEOLPES
YEAR HAKE fCOEL CYL CIC PPL CCCPR INST RChF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 DCDG CART 6 318 2 245C7 35CC 11.2 If N EM ¦> A
GRAMS PFR KILE
1975 COMPOSITE
hc co cc? ncx m
3.e2 39.Cf nt.3 1.97 15.1C
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SI MJLATEC 1972 HCT
4. 16 48.2e 52e.s i.eo 14.41
3.56 32.11 5C6.7 2.C9 15.67
CCLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 17.38 241.3G 1 755 .C 4.57 14. e 5
COLD ST4GILIZFC GH/SMS 13.8C 12C.77 2211.9 (.<55 14.C2
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 12.59 12C.C7 15 g e. 5 8.75 17.88
HDT STARILIZEC GRAMS 13.61 92 .16 21 1 1 .3 8.39 14.SI
«»»««*»# «**««»«»*»**»**
ANALYSIS CF KEY-KCDE -EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 30 25
MASS 4.37
2.9e 12.86 730
75. C8 4 £ 3 . 3 1 2.64
14.48
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 4655
MASS 3.64
1.17 13.lt 12 C 7
2C.33 3 52 . f 7 3.C6
22.47
IDLE
C CCNC 2118 C.69 13.62 210
MASS C. 48 2 .78 <53.82 C.16
C.CC
Cr^PCSITE
25 CCNC
MASS
3674
1.81
2.22
22.86
56 1
1.22
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LARCRATCP IES , INC.
19900 E. COLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
192
-------
TEST K*BEP: ECUC
CAR NUPeER: CC31
AFTER
dynamometer emission resllts using
1975 FECERAL TEST PRCCECIRES
YEAR WAKE KCCEL CYL CIC BEL CCCKR INRT RCFP A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1970 DODG CART 8 31fl 2 2453C 35CC 11.2 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILF
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
PPG
1975 CCfFCSITE
5.23
'48. C?
M4.5
2.CC
14.66
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
5.67
59.73
52S.C
2.49
13.9C
SIMULATED 1S72
HCT
4.6S
3S.2C
5C3.5
3.3e
15.34
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
23.tO
322.7*
16 5 6.1
t.es
13.32
CCLH STAeiLIZEC
GRAMS
18.9?
125.23
2 ICS .2
11.ei
14.4S
HCT TRANSIENT
GR APS
17.76
168.81
1 it7 .3
13.58
It.35
HOT STAeiLIZEC
GR ACS
19.7C
10C.8S
2CC7.2
14.11
15.3S
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 4447
MASS 4.75
2.3S 13.33 13St
55.56 .483.tC 5.28
15.2C
LCV. CRUISE 3C CCNC 5261
PASS 4.44
C.87 13.65 2C77
15.75 36C.35 5.7t
21.25
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
2848
C.Sfc
C . 3 5 1 ? . 3 1
C.63 S2.S1
iee
C. 13
O.CC
COMPOSITE
25 CCNC
MASS
4244
2.C3
1.73
16.CS
Sit
2.26
AL'TQWCTlVE TESTING L A PC P * T C P I E S t INC.
19900 F. CCLFAX, HRCRA, CCLC. 6CC11
193
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC104
CAR KIP-BER : CC 32
BEfCBE
DYNAMOMETER EM ISS ICN PESLLTS LSINC
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCC ECliRE S
YFAR MAKE C L CYL CID get CCCMP I.NRT RCHP A/C EVP E#h PCV TRANS
1970 MERC MARCU 8 429 2 12956 450C 12,7 N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NC*
KPG
1975 COMPOSITE
7.97
65. Si
593.3
3.49
12.34
SIMULATED 1972
COLC
1C.26
76.42
6C5.2
3*34
U»75
S1 MJLAT FC 1972
HCT
6,23
57.82
f E4.3
3.61
12.62
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
46.60
339.41
2C49.9
12.99
ii.sc
COLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
3C.37
<33.71
24EE.9
12.C7
11.61
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
16.36
199.93
1E93.4
15.C 1
14.39
HOT STAeiLIZFO
GRAMS
15.99
?C9 .63
2425,8
12.2C
12.22
ANALYSIS r.r KEY-^CDE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX
MPO
HIGH CRUISE 40 CCNC 3647
1.9e 13.65 2193
MASS 4.31 46.S8 5CC.C2 8.1:
15.lt
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 34C4 C.92 14,CC 1628
MASS 3.21 18.6? 426 .C€ 4.e5
IS.12
IDLE
C CCNC 3473 2.9C 12.ee 113
MASS C.69 12.22 66.3C C,1C
C.CC
CCVPCSITE 27 CCNC 3590 1.93
MASS 1.89 21.6 7
9C9
2.73
AUTCVCTIVE TESTING I APCR A T C B I E S , INC..
1990C E; COLFAX, «LRCA, CCLC. 9CC11
19U
-------
TEST NIJMPER: E0111
CAP KKeER: CC 32
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR HAKE KCDEL CYL CIC BEL COOP I NAT RCHF A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1970 MERC MAPCU 8 429 2 12973 450C 12.7 N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
3.98 39.75 65C.6 3.C6 12.27
SIMULATEC 1972 CCLC 1.78
SIMULATED 19 72 HCT 3.37
55.59 664.2 2.94 11.62
27.81 64C.6 3.15 12.61
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
22.61
319.33
2 184.8
11.64
11.79
CCLD
STABILIZED
GRAMS
13.21
97.5E
2 796.5
1C.4C
11.46
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
12.C9
11C.99
2CCE.2
13.19
14.64
HOT
STABILIZEC
GRAMS
11.57
69.97
26e6.3
1C.33
12. 1C
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 3821 1.97 13.62 1922
MASS 4.19 46.65 5C4.87 7.29
15.Ct
LCK CRUISE 33 CCNC 3126 C.83 14.2C 1241
MASS 2.83 17.C3 439. C6 3.e6
1E. 76
ICLF
0 CONC
MASS
1480
0.51
C.4S 13.82
2 .92 144.4e
239
C. 25
C.CC
CCMPC S I TE 27 CCNC 3321 1.4E
MASS 1 •7 C 15.45
eC6
2.47
AUTCMfTIVF TESTING LACCRATCP IES , INC,
1990 C E. CCLFAX, A LP CP i• CCLC. 8CC11
195
-------
TEST MPBEP: EC 11A
CAR MJ^PEP: CC33
BEFCPE
DYNAMCMETEP EMISSICN PESILTS LSINO
1975 FECEPAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDFL CYL CIC RRL CCCMR INRT BCHP A/C EVP E*h PCV TRANS
1969 BUIC SFORT 0 4QO 4 39637 450C 12.7 Y K EM Y A
GRAMS PEP PILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CO CG2 NCX MPG
6.15 72. C4 555.9 4.9C 12.93
S1MULA TED 197? CCLC
S I MULATEC 1972 HOT
6.76 84.65 578.2 4.82 12.16
5.69 62.52 535.C 4.96 13.59
COLC TRANSIENT GRAMS 2e.C8 3(5.79 2C92.C 22.27 ll.fiC
COLO STA6ILI2ED GRAMS 22. 56 269.C8 2244.4 13.66 12.52
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 20. C8 199.92 1798 .3 23.35 14.94
HCT STAEILIZFC GRAMS 22.74 274.CZ 22CC.5 15.33 12.68
44444*44444*4444 444 4 44444*4**4**4
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NO
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 2465
MASS
LOK CRUISE 33 CCNC
MASS
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
CCMFCSITE ?7 CCNC
MASS'
3.25
3341
3.39
6324
C .93
3260
1.77
13
1
it
17
1
ie
47 12.69
i 7 3 2
69 4E5.3E 14.93
14 1C.89 1724
17 368 .23 5.66
46
4C
43
43
11.21
69.11
74
C. 1C
1 2 C 6
4.42
17.22
20.51
O.CC
AUTTMCTIVE TESTING LA9CPATCR IES , INC..
199GC E. CCLFAX, filPCRA, CCLC. 0CC11
196
-------
TEST NUMRFR: ECUS
CAP MJHEEP: CC33
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER Em I ss icn PESllIS using
1575 FEDERAL TEST PPCCECtRES
YEAR MAKF MCDEL CYL CIC RBL CDCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1969 BUIC SPORT e 400 4 39*54 45CC 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC 2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
4.20
37.42
(24.3
5.18
12.79
SIMULATED 1972
CCLD
4.60
.45.65
653.9
5.46
12.C3
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
3.90
31.23
6C2.1
4.97
13.42
CCLD TRASSIENT
GRAMS
18.15
2C7.27
2224.6
27.64
11.96
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS
16. 32
135.12
256S.5
13.32
12.1C
HOT TRA^IENT
GRAMS
12.92
99.13
1946 .1
23.97
15.17
HOT STAB 1LIZE C GRAMS
15. C9
117.45
2234.e
13.24
13.9C
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCOE
EMSSICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
2593
0.61
12.92
2948
MASS
2.C5
17.5C .
479.e5
15.27
17.23
LCW CRUISE 33
CCNC
1995
C.9C
12.13
2146
MASS
2.C2
25.67
371 .61
6.77
21.29
IDLE 0
CONC
2CC2
C.73
12. CC
318
MASS
0.52
3.9P .
1CC.3C
C.25
C.CC
CCMPCS1TE ?7
CCKC
2422
0.63
147C
MASS
1 .Cfc
9 • 7(
4.7e
AUTOMOTIVE TFSTING LAPCBATCR IES
1990C F. CCLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC.
, IK.
eccn
197
-------
TEST MPBER: EC 115
CAR MJPEER: 0C34
eEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EflSSICK PESLLTS IS1NC
1975 FECERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR WAKE PCOFL CYL CID BflL COfPR INRT RCHF A/C EVF EXH PC\i TRANS
1972 CADI CEV1L 8 472 4 5122 5COC 13.4 Y Y AI Y A
GRAPS PEP MILE HC CO CC2 NC> PPG
1975 COMPOSITE 1.59 4t.tf 629.5 2.77 9.81
SIPULA TEC 1972 CCLD I.E5 51.65 881.9 2.89 9.19
SIPULATEO 1972 HCT 1.39 42.9C 789.9 2.68 10.34
CCLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
9.04
237.19
3CE6.6
13.28
9.32
COLO
STAPIL I 2EC
GRAf S
4.85
150.20
3 5 Z 7 .9
E.4C
9.C7
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRANS
5. e i
171.52
239C. 1
11.7C
12.12
HOT
STAEILIZFC
GRAPS
5.2C
224.39
32TE.2
t.3e
9.4C
*444444*444*444444444444444 4 *4***
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCDE EMSSICNS
SPEED . HC CC CC2 NC X PFG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CGNC 489 0.57 12.El 1328
PASS C .78 19.9C f 57 .C9 7.39 12.89
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 951! 1.29 11.44 454
PASS 1 . 37 49.CE 493 . tE 1.97 15.48
IDLE 0 CCNC 1358 2.fc6 1C.5C 5e
PASS 0.51 20.2C 13C .61 C.C9 C.CC
COP PC SITE ? 7 CCNC 697 1 .OC 399
PASS C.66 23.3C 2.C7
AUTCPCTIVF TESTING LAPCRATCP IES , INC.
1990C E. CCIFAX, />U°CR«, CCLC. 8CC11
198
-------
TEST MMBEF: EC120
CAP MMPER: CC34
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICK RESLLTS CSINC
1975 FEOERAL TEST PRCCECCRES
YEAR HAKE MODEL CYL CIO BBL CDOMR IKRT RChP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1972 CADI OEVIL 6 472 4 5X39 5000 13.4 Y Y AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE HC CO CC2 MOX MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
1.33
53.92
£37 .2
2.76
9.62
SIMULATE!) 1972 COLC
1.44
59.26
est.9
2.97
9.0C
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
1.25
49.90
7«6.C
2.60
1C.14
r.PLO tra*iSIpNT r.eMy«
6; 94
?*4.1t
3174.e
14.14
r. c:
TL') r.T».PRI/rr CM"?'
*.
-------
TEST MtfEER: EG 117
CAR M.PPER s CC35
EEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN RESLLTS LSING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YFAP MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC RBL CDCMR INRT RCFP 4/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
156 9 FCRD F 41 PL 6 209 2 A 7255 35CC U.2 N £« Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
3.St
27.6'
456,7
4.33
16.11
SIMULATEO 1972
CCLC
4,36
36.55
515.2
4.53
15,18
SIMULATED 1=7?
hgt
3,65
2C.9 1
4.17
16,09
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
17.51
173.51
ieu.6
2C.35
15.19
CCLD STABILIZEC
GRANS
15.27
ICC .65
-------
TEST NLPBEP: EC12e
CAP NOM0 ER! CC35
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESILTS LSIKG
I<575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CI C PGL CCCMR IK.RT RCFP A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1968 FHRC FAIRL 8 289 2 42271 35CC 11.2 N N Ef Y A
GRAMS PEP MILF
197 5 CCMFOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MFG
3.41 21.75 5CE.1 3.52 16.1C
SI^ULATER 197? CCLC 3.6C
SIMULATEC 1972 HOT 2.27
28.39 528.5 3.94 15.24
16.75 492.6 3.2C 16.e3
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.91
15e.97
191C.2
21.51
14.71
COLO
STABIL1ZEC
GRAMS
11.C6
53.94
2C53.E
6.C5
15.77
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.43
71.69
1641.C
15.93
le.ic
l-OT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
13.64
EC.26
2166. C
1C.6C
14.68
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICKS
SPEEC HC CC CC 2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 3219 C.35 14.14 275C
HASS 3. 6C e.C2 .419 .26 9.43
17.35
LOW CRUISE 30 CONC 3717
MASS 3.23
C.41 13.E5
9.84 3e7.12
1396
3.80
21.57
IDLE
0 CCNC 3271 2.66 13.11 129
MASS 0.64 11.65 ES.2C C.ll
C.CC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 3282 C.76
MASS 1.66 1C .54
956
2.86
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRfTCPlES? INC.
19900 E. C0LF4X, 4LRCRC, CCLC. 6CC11
201
-------
TEJ1 NUMBER: ECUS
CAP MMEER: 0C36
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCC ECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC GEL CCCMP JNRT RCFF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1972 CHEV MCNTE 8 402 4 4662 4CGC 12.C Y Y AI Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMFOSITE
HC CC CC2 N£X MFG
1.70 42.42 660.5 2.89 11.83
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
SIMULATEC 1972 HOT
1.84 43.44 699.6 2.97 11.51
1.60 41.6? 666.1 2.83 12.C9
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
8.46
140.97
227C.6 14.72
12.91
COLD
STABILIZED
GRAMS
5.30
ie4.84
2976.6 7.53
1C.44
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
o>
•
o
CD
127.56
2C18.E 13.67
14.51
HOT
STAfilLIZEC
GRAMS
5.10
187.84
2848.9 6.£8
ic.es
* «
« * * 4 * *
* * *
* ~ ~ *
« » * *
» * ~ #
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEED . HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 1042 C.75 11.51 1741
MASS 1.4ft 26.23 541.C8 7.96
15.17
LCH CRUISE 33 CCNC 1I5C
MASS 1.45
1.13 1C.72 5C8
44.43 456.CI 2.C3
16.79
IDLE
0 CCNC 1584 3.33 1C.6C 48
MASS 0.42 21.42 1C6.32 C.C6
C.CO
CCMPOSITE 27 CCNC 1152 1.22
MASS 0.79 25.16
487
2.19
AUTGVGTIVE TESTING L* PCRiTCR I ES , INC.
1990C F. COLF/SX, ^IRCPA, CCIC. eCCll
202
-------
TEST NLMPER! EC13C
CAP M.MEER: CC36
/FT EP
CVN'/MOMETEP Ef ISS ICN PESILTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCFCLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CIC P<»L CCCMR INRT RCI-F A/C EVP EXh PCV -TRANS
1972 CHEV MCNTE 8
402 4
46EC 4CCC
12. C
V Y AI
Y A
CRAMS PER KILE
HC
CC
CC2
NO *
MPG
197= COMPOSITE
1.68
52.14
666 .4
1.99
11.81
SIMULATED 1972
cnic
2. 18
57.2E
66G. 1
2.CO
11.35
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
1.65
48.26
65C.1
use
12. IE
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11.n
221.C3
2 2 5 2.6
9.41
12.34
CCLO ST4E1LIZEC
GPSMS
5.1?
2Ce.fcC
2
-------
TEST NliMgER:- EC 122
CAR NLMeER: CC27
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN BESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE fTDEL CYL CID Bei CDCMR IKRT RCHF */C EVP EXhPCV TRANS
1970 AMMC AVHAS 8 360 2 26651 ACCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER PILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMFPSITE
5.C5
1C2.95
5CS.4
3.72
12.96
SIMULATED 1972
COLC
5.78
115.21
516.6
3.52
12.44
SIMULATED 1972
HC T
4.49
9 3 .7 C
5C4.1
3.87
13.38
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
24.92
436 .76
179C.C
14.77
12.72
COLD STAeiLIZFC
GRAMS
t8.45
4Z7.35
2C64.4
11. 6C
12. ie
HOT TRANSIENT
GR CMS
15.22
275 .41
1696 .C
17.40
14.93
HOT STABILIZED
GRAMS
17.25
374 .98
21C5.6
ii.es
12.47
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCOE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC
MASS
307(3 1.04 14.36 3299
3.59 37 .99 5C€. C4 1C.97
15.3E
LCVi CRUISE 33 CCNC
MASS
3662
1.71 13.53
3.41 33.22 393.37
2C92
3.34
19.51
IOLE
0 CCNC 3543 5.C6 1C.91 114
MASS 0.83 24 .2E E8.2t C.13
C.CC
CCMPCSITE 27 CCNC 3221 1.79
MASS 1.60 26.7C
1244
3.14
AUTQPCTIVE TESTING LARCRAT CP I ES , INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
20U
-------
TEST MKeER: EC135
CAR NOEEP : CC37
AFTER
DYNAMCVETEP EMISSICN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL. TEST PROCECLRES
YEAR HAKE PCDFL CYL
1970 AMMC A^BAS 8
CIC PPL
360 2
CCCMR. INRT
26673 4C0C
RCHP
12.C
A/C EVP E >H
Y N EM
PCV TRi
V
GRAMS PER NILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMFCSITE
4. 65
58.7C
532 .£
2.e3
13.91
SIMULATED 19 7?
CCLC
5.11
73.CC
528.2
3.51
13.21
SIMULATED IS 72
HCT
4.66
47.92
52E.7
4.C8
14.39
CCLD TRANS1FM
GRAMS
22.65
349.CC
1766.1
13.73
13.51
CCLO STAeiLIZEC
GRA^S
15.7C
198.47
225C.4
12.59
12. 12
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
19.22
16C.92
1714.6
17. SS
16. C2
HOT STAPILNEC
GRAMS
15.75
166.67
2179.E
12.ce
13.59
*«**««*«
ANALYSIS 1
DF KEY-MCDE
-Ef ISSICAS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NO
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CONC
3237
1.11
13.76
29C4
MASS
3.59
37.4 7
4«6.43
1C .43
15.72
LOW CRUISE 33
CCNC
3 e21
1.59
13.56
1 7 C 5
MASS
3.37
34.9 6
3e7 .34
4.76
19.66
IDLE 0
CCNC
2764
1.56
12.26
216
MASS
C.71
9.54
111.51
C . 19
C.CC
COMPOSITE 27
CONC
3216
1.19
11C8
MASS
1.72
19.35
2.29
AUTCPCTIVF TESTING LA0CPATCR I E S
, INC .
199CC F. CGLFiX, ilRCRi, CCLC. RCC11
205
-------
TEST Nlif'EEP: EC123
CAR MEMBER: CC38
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISS1CN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCEDtRES"
YFAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC RBL CCCMR 1NRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1970 FORD GALAX e 390 2 58311 4000 12.C V N EM Y A
GRAMS PFR KILE
1975 CCHPOS ITE
SIMULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
HC CO CC2 NOX
3. 93 SC.41 6E9.6 2.98
4.41 59.7C 7C7.4 2.64
3.58 43.4 1 676.2 3.C9
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
19.25
277.4C
2 3 64.6
ic.ec
CCLO
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
13.82
17C.36
292C.1
1C.5C
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.CC
155.21
215C.5
12.67
HOT
STABILIZED
GRAMS
13.83
166.24
2614.5
1C.C3
* * * M « « • M M M M M I M M M M M
MPG
I. AC
C.93
1.78
1.26
C.6 1
3.35
c.ee
» * ~
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC 2541 1.C5 14.14 1682
MASS 3.23 34.35 5E9.9C 6.63
13.61
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 2698 1.7C 13.85 777
MASS 2.78 44.6? 491. 1C 2.45
15.61
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
1741
0.15
0.35 14.2C
1.52 114.22
153
C.16
C.CC
CCMPCSITF 27 CONC 2412
MASS 1.22
0.94
14.53
596
c • C 2
AUTCMCTIVF TESTING L-'ARC R'A'TCR IES , INC.
19900 E." CCLFAX", flCRCRi, CCLC. 3CC11
206
-------
TEST NLMBER! EC134
CAR NUMeER: CC30
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESLLT5 ISING
1975 FECEPAL TEST PRGCECURES
YE«P HAKE MCPE-L CYl C1C EPL CCCMP ;I NR T PCI-P A/C EVP EXI- PCV TRANS
157C FORD GALAX e 390 2 5E355 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PFR MILE
HC
cc
CC2
NC*
CPG
1975 CfMFOSITE
4.15
39.ec
614.7
3.C7
12. 9C
SIMUL4TEC 1972
CCLC
4.19
*
(hi
CD
00
637.6
2.C7
12.37
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
4.12
36.71
597.4
3.C7
13.33
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
17.65
2C2.4E
217C.5
12.92
12.77
COLO STAGILIZEO
GPAMS
13.73
126.65
2611.7
1C.1C
12.CI
HOT TRANSIENT
GPAMS
17.16
lie.7i
l£6e.E
12.94
15.07
HOT STABILI2EC
GRAMS
13.63
14C.94
25C2.4
5.17
12.39
******
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC
MASS
LCH CRUISE 23 CCKC
MASS
IOLE
0 CONC
MASS
3028
3.75
32C2
3.24
2367
C.56
1.35 13.
-32. 551.
1.87 13.
47.33 447.
0.20 14.
1.04 116.
1937
7.45
9C4
2. S3
145
C.24
MPG
13.54
16.72
O.OC
CCf PCS ITE 27 CCNC ?92f> 1.13
MASS 1.65 lfi.OC
675
2.35
AllTC^C T I VE TESTING LAflC»ATCP I ES , INC.
1S900 F. COLFAX, ALRCR«, CCLC. 8CC11
207
-------
TEST NIPPER: FC139
CAP NIIMEER! CC39
BEFORE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESILTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CI C RBI CnCMR INRT ROF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
I960 DCDG POLAR 8 318 2 5£22C 4CCC 12.C N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
f PG
1975 CCMFOSITF
5.C4
75.15
«ei.i
2.6C
14.4E
SI MUL AT EC 1S72
CCLC
fc.72
lCC.Cf
«ec. i
2.2C
13.52
SI Mill A T FC 1 <572
HGT
3.78
56.36
^81. e
2.91
15.29
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
35.ae
556.6A
1543.8
5.41
12.85
CCLD STABILIZED
GRAMS
15. C5
193.82
2CS7.C
11.12
14.23
HOT TRANSIENT
GRA«S
13.28
228.9C
1554.6
IC.67
16.6C
HOT STAeiLIZFC
GRAMS
13.E2
153.72
2C 15 . e
11.22
14.9C
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
EC ISS
ICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC 2
NC>
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CONC
33Ct
3.C8
13.C3
1511
MASS
3.62
71.79
454.C9
5.32
15.4C
LOW CRUISE 33
CCNC
3717
2.16
13.2E
16 46
MASS
3.CI
41.27
355.19
4.44
2C.73
IOLE 0
CCNC
?245
C.55
13.56
146
MASS
C.43
2.C9 .
64.16
C. 1C
0.CC
CCMPOSIT E 27
CCNC
3157
2.37
PCI
MASS
1.52
23.9C
2 .C2
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LAECPATCPIES
1S<»CC E. COLFAX, HRCRi, CCLC.
, INC.
PCC 11
208
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC147
CAR NllHE EP: CC39
AFTER
CYNAMOMETEP EMfSSICN RESILTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCEClRES
YEAR V AK E CCOEL CVL CIC flflL CCCMP INRT RCHF A/C EVP EXt- FCV TRANS
1968 DOOC PCLAP £ 318 2 58238 4CCC 12.C N N EP V A
GRAMS PEP MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NC*
MFG
1975 CCMFOSITE
5.37
64.67
474.e
3.26
15.CI
SI^ULATEC 1972
COLC
6.9ft
74.16
475 .2
2.85
14.51
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
<1.17
57.52
474.4
3.57
15.41
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
35.54
373.46
155C.7
6.63
14.45
COLD STAeiLWEC
GRAMS
16.65
182.71
2C13.4
14.78
14.57
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.63
24e .67
1544.6
12.CC
16.4C
HOT STABIL I ZEC
GRAMS
IA . 39
152.CC
19E1.1
13.96
15. 13
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCCE EPISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CPUISE 49 CCNC 3647
MASS 3.65
1.44 12.8? 1545
76.71 456.35 5.56
15.12
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3891 1.67 13.3t 1976
MASS 3.15 3k.44 362.41 5.Ce
2C.73
IDLE
0 CCINC 2465 0.31 13.33 151
MASS C.45 2.C9 77.14 C.1C
C.CC
CCMPCSITE 27 CCNC 345R 2.53
MASS 1.61 24.6C
9C5
2.19
ALTCMC TIVE TESTING LAfiCP A TCP IES , INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX, JIRCRA, CCLC. 6CC11
209
-------
TEST MfBERS EC 113
CAR HPBER: CC4C
EEFCBE
DYNAMOMETER I S£ICK PESILIS IS INC
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YF AR MAKE KCDEL CYL CIC 8RL CCCMR INRT PCFP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1972 FCRO LTC 8 400 2 6450 4CC0 12.C Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PEP fILR
1975 COMPOSITE
FC CO CC2 NCX MPG
3.23 20.^4 til.3 4.18 12.33
SIMULATED 1 *572 CCLC 3.41
SIMULATED 197? H(1 T 3.12
46. C< 673 .9 4.19 11.75
32.49 634.2 4.17 12.61
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 16.64 224 .49 2345 .E
CCLO STAPIL12FC GRAMS 10.42 12C.9e 27CE.e
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 12. c.l
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 1C.C5
124.21 2C41.5
153.61 256C.C
17.9C
13.52
17.76
12.1C
11.62
11.69
14.23
12.C9
44«44«**«4«4444»444«4444444«44»*»
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMSSICNS
SPEEO HC CC CC 2 NCX
¥ FG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC
2228
C.87 13.94
29C4
MASS 2.76 30.55 5E3.64 11.64
13.91
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC
1873
C . 5 1 14.11
MASS 1.E8 12.35 461.51
1396
4.44
ie.29
IDLE
C CCNC 2819 2.9C 12.45 1C2
MASS C.65 17. C2 99.67 C. 10
O.CC
COMPOSITE. 27 CCNC 2298 1.16
MASS 1.33 19.91
973
3.46
AUTCMCT IVE TEST I N G L A P C R A 1C R 1 E S , INC.
199CC E. CHLFAX, 4LRCRA, CCLC.'flCCll
210
-------
TEST MMPER: EC14e
CAR MIPeEPJ CC40
/> F T EB
OYNAMO"ETER EMISSION PESLITS IS INC.
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CID 6eL CCCfR INRT RCHF A/C EVP E XV- FCV TRANS
197? FCRC LTD 8 400 2 6472 4C0C 12.C Y Y EM V A
CRAMS PER fILF
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMPDSITE
3.14
35 .94
t<1.7
4.17
12.23
SIMULATED 197?
COLD
3.54
46.55
68C.E
4.C6
11.64
SIMULATEC 19 72
HOT
2.84
27.93
647.3
4.26
12.72
COLD TRAf,SIENT
GRAMS
16.53
254.63
2263.9
17.13
11.88
CCLD STAEILI2EC
GRAPS
1C.C4
94.26
2E22.4
13.22
11.42
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11.26
115.25
2C32.6
ie.6o
14.45
HOT STABILIZED
GRAWS
9.99
92.24
2723.1
12.35
11.62
**«««***
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
-EPISSICNS
SPEEC
KC
CC
CC2
NCX
PPG
UGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
2332
l.ce
13.94
2479
MASS
2.E4
38.24
563.35
9.72
14.CE
LOW CRUISE 33
CCNC
2C19
C.76
14.14
1261
PASS
2.CI
ie.69
461.57
4.13
17.91
IDLE 0
CCNC
1671
0.76
13.65
192
MASS
0.50
6.49
141.49
C.2C
C.OC
COMPOSITE ?7
CCNC
2179
C.92
695
MASS
1.26
15.ec
3.C4
AUTOMOTIVE TFSTING LAPCP1TCR I ES . INC •
199CC F.. COLFAX, /ilttCPA, CCLC. fiCCll
211
-------
TEST MMB ER: EC 1 A3
CAP NUfFEP: CC41
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESLLTS LS INC
1S75 FEOERAL TEST FRCCECIPES
YE AR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC QEL CCC»»P INRT PCHF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 CLDS TCKCN 8 455 4 29C35 5CCC 13.A V Y E M Y A
GRAMS PER NILE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMPOSITE 3.94 56.64 472.C 3.65 11.51
SI MJL ATE C 19 72 CGLC 4.28 64.08 7CC.5 3.45 1C.S1
SIWULATEC IS72 HCT 3.69 5C.42 65C.4 3.65 12.CI
CCLD TRANSIENT OR/MS 16.81 291.94 2567.C 15.C? 1C.56
COLD STABILIZED GRA^s 15.26 194.65 26E7.C 12.25 11.27
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 12.39 183.51 2191.1 15.12 12.91
HCT STAEILI Z EC GRAMS 15 . 12 193 .82 2713.9 11.2C 11.1E
44444«44*44*44««4444*4**** * *44**9'
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEFC HC CC CC2 NO* MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC ' 142fl C.31 14.35 1859
MASS 1.P9 9.42 .631.45 £.78 13.65
LCh CRUISE 33 CCNC 2854 1.44 13.65 1C19
MASS 3.CC 39.61 499.21 3.8C 15.6C
ICLE 0 CCNC 2426 1.C3 12.19 6C
MASS C.49 5.95 86.81 0.C6 O.OC
COMPOSITE 27 CONC 1761 C.55 655
MASS 1.C9 1C.52 2.68
AUTCNfTIVE TESTING LA PCRA TCP IES , INC.
199CC ?. r.CLFAX, £ L R C R A , CCLC. 8C011
212
-------
TEST NUMeEP: EC 155
CAP Mj^eER: CC41
#FTER
DVNAMOWFTER EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
1975 FECEPAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAH MAKE MODEL CYL CIC RBL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXW PCV TRANS
1971 GLDS TCRCN 8 455 4 29C35 5CCC 13.4 Y Y EM V A
CC2
744 .
GRAMS PER MILE HC CC
1975 CCMPOSITE 3.83 56.76
SIMULATED 1972 COLC 4.24 .65.35 767,
SIMULATEC 1972 HCT 3.52 50.28 727,
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
16.65
3C5.31
2656.1
11.69
1C. 19
CCLD
STAEIL IZFC
GRAMS
15.18
1E4.EJ
3C94.6
1C.56
9.99
HCT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11. 19
152.2?
2362.6
12.35
12.04
HCT
STABIL IZEC
GRAMS
12.(5
119.3<
2<96.9
1C.C1
1C.63
NCX
3.C2
2.97
3.C6
MPG
IC.53
io. ce
ic.es
ANALYSIS OF KEY-MCCE EMISSIONS
SPEEC. HC CO CC2 NO
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 523
MASS 0.7C
0.21 14.C8 1C29
6.43 .747.C2 5.7 A
11.73
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC
MASS
264 5
1.C3 13.ft
2.99 37.1C 517.34
^ 1.3
3.28
15.22
10LE
C CONC
MASS
2228
0.53
1.C1 12.45
6.61 1C5.63
82
c.ce
C.CC
COMPOSITE ?7 CCNC 1C59 C.43
MASS C.79 9.92
4ec
1. S 3
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRATCP IES • INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AI.RCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
213
-------
TEST MfRER: EC144
CAP MIMEER! CC42
0EFCPE
CYKAMCMETER EMISSICN PESILTS UINO
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR "AKE MCDEl CYL CIC EPL CCCMP INR T RCHP A/C EVP E XH PCV TRANS
1568 PlYM FIP.Y2 8 318 2 56018 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
CRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMFOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MPC
7.63 121.41 495.5 2.88 12.54
SIMULATEC 1972 CGIC
SI "ULATEC IS 72 HCT
9.9C 134. C7 5C9.5 2.84 11.9C
6.66 111.8 "l 4 6 4.9 2.SI 13.C6
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
38.43 '
!38.5f
1754.6
1C.61
11.94
CCLO
STAEILI2EC
CRAMS
28.35
466.97
2C66.7
ic.6e
11.86
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
21.62
372. C3
1569.9
u.ll
CM
•
HOT
STAeiL IZEC
CRAMS
20.47
2 35.94
2C76.6
16.17
13.65
ANALYSIS CF K EY-MC C E EMSSICNS
SPEED t-C CC CC2 NCX
M PG
HCH CPU ISF 49 CCNC 3195 1.79 13.66 2347
MASS 3.56 49.59 496.75 8.62
15.15
LOU CRUISE 33 CCNC 35C6
MASS 3.23
1.2C 13.82 2C61
24.17 412.63 6.15
19.32
IDLE
0 CONC 2562 C.99 13.56 11C
MASS C. 64 3.e2 e2.66 C.C9
C.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 3113 1;49
MASS 1.66 17.54
1C 56
3. 10
AUTCGT ! VE TESTINC LAeCRATCP IES , INC.
1990C F. enLFAX. AIRCRA , 'CCLC . 8CC11
2U
-------
TEST MMGEPs EC157
CAR M.HEEB : CC42
AFTER
CYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS LSIKG
1975 FECERAL TEST PPCCECIRES
YEAP HAKE MCDEL CYL CIC BRL CCCMP INRT PCFF A/C EVP EXF FCV TPANS
1568 PLYM FURY2 8 318 2 56064 4C0C 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP MUF
FC
CC
CC2
NC>
MPG
IS75 CCMPOSITE
6.5C
99.9 2
5Cf .3
3. 6C
12.9E
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
7.94
12B.38
5ie.4
2.97
11.95
SIMULATEC 1972
l-CT
5.41
78.4!
5CC.7
4.C6
13.89
CCLO TRAr*SIENT
GR AMS
3 5.15
527.25
17f3.2
11. 15
11.94
COLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
24.39
435.57
21C5.1
11.11
11.96
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
16.16
152.7f
165C.C
19.45
16.75
HCT STAEIL1ZPC
GRAMS
16.68
125.ee
2C1C.7
16.4C
IE.It
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
-EMISSICNS
SPEEO .
HC
CO
CC2
KCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
3161
1.63
13.42
2479
MASS
3.46
44.5!
515.94
9.39
14.92
LCW CPU ISE 33
CCNC
3369
c.ec
13.53
2278
MASS
3.C4
18.53
421.99
6.5e
19.33
IDLE 0
CCNC
2489
0.65
12.66
87
MASS
C.38
1 .61
<7.19
C.C5
C.OC
COMPOSITE 27
CCNC
30 £0
I .2f
1130
MASS
1.44
14.25
3.28
AUTCMOTIVE TESTING I AI?C R A TCP I E S , INC.
1990C E. Cni.F/SX, ALRCR ' » CCLC . 8CC11
215
-------
TEST MfRER: EC 150
CAP MfPER: CC43
EEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECI.RES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC RBI CCCMR INPT POP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 DATS 510
-------
TEST MPRER: EC 16C
CAR NU^EEP: CC43
AFTER
CYNAKC^ETER E^I SSICN PFSLLTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLPES
YEAR HAKF PCDEL CYL CIO eBL CDCfP INRT PCFP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 DATS 510
-------
TEST MMPER: EC151
CAR NLMeER: CC44
etFCPE
DYNAMQMFTEP FMISSICN PESLLTS USING
1*375 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YFAR MAK* MCDEL CYL CIC PPL COCMP INRT PCHF A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1972 VCLV 142S 4 121 2 6ie5 275C 9.9 N Y EM Y S-4
GRAMS PER PILE
1975 CCMPOSITF
HC CC CC2 NCX PPG
4.C3 28.S8 324.2 2.6C 22.26
SIMULA TEO 1S72 COLC 4.71
SIMULATEC 1972 HCT 2.53
33.41 226.1 2.59 22.63
25.64 222.£ 2.61 22.79
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
2C.9C
136.66
1149.7
1C .69
22.67
CCLD
STAE1L I ZEC
GRAMS
14.40
111.89
1J95.7
E. 77
22.6C
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
12. C6
SC.41
1125.4
1C.79
25.2C
HCT
STARILIZEC
GRAMS
15.CB
111.22
12C2.5
6.C2
22.49
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCCE EMISSIONS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX mfg
HIGH CRUISE 37 CONC 2566 0.79 12.97 2C92
PASS 1.09 14. C9 361 . 11 5 .C5 22.ae
LCW CRUISE 23 CCNC 2437 l.OC 12.86 469
MASS 1.25 16.35 244.13 C.E4 32.49
IDLE 0 CCNC 3472 2.82 1C.43 59.
MASS 0.46 5.5 1 28.9C C.C3 O.OC
COMPOSITE 20 CCNC 2722 1.15 547
mass c.93 e.ee 1.21
AUTCwniVE TESTING L A BC R A T C P I E S , INC.
1990C E. CCL FAX, ALPCHA, CCLC. «CC 1 1
218
-------
TEST M>BEP s EC159
CAB NLM8ER: CC44
t FTER
DYNAMOMETER FMtSSICN PFSLLTS LS1NG
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCEDLRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC EPL CCCMR INRT POP A/C EVP E XH PCV TRANS
1972 VCLV 142S 4 121 2 62C6 275C 9.S N Y EM Y S-4
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 COFOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
8.69 89.95 3C9.C 2.20 ie.64
SIMULATED 1S72 CCLC
SIMULATED IS72 HCT
13.45 116.42 2C3.C 1.7fc 16.e4
5.1C 6S.82 313.5 2.53 20.27
CCLO TRANSIENT G°.Awc 78.96 554.5t S36.1 A.43 15.76
CCLD STA61LIZEC GRAMS 21.20 320. 12 1234.3 f.74 17.98
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 16.34 2C3.6C 1C16.8 IC.25 23.41
HOT STARILI2EC GRAMS 22.23 2=5.64 1397.C 8.88 17.74
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 37 CONC 35C8
MASS 2.16
2.74 12.72 1744
37.65 273.14 2.6 7
26.26
LCV. CRUISE 23 CCNC 4238
MASS 2.ce
4.81 1C.5E 279
57.C5 2C2.ie C.49
29.84
I CLE
0 CCNC 8758 6.9S 7.7C 45
MASS 0.81 16.47 29.28 C.C2
O.CC
COMPOSITE 2C CCNC 4541 3.6C
MASS 1 .28 26.2?
423
C.71
AUTOMOTIVE TFSTING LABCPMCR 1ES» INC.
199QG F.. COLFAX, AlHCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
219
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC221
CAP NUMEER: CC45
BEFCBE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESLITS LSING
1575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL
197C VCLK ltOC
CYL i
4
C1C BEL
57 C
CDCMR URT
48183 2 i C C
PCHP
5.4
A/C FVP EXF
N N EM
PCV TRAN!
Y S-4
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NO
MPG
1975 CCM FC SITE
2. 1
22.61
346 .6
2.86
22.85
SI MULATEC 1572 CCLC
3.CO
29.86
349.C
3.C5
21.97
SIMULATEC 1572 HCT
1.56
17.13
344.E
2.72
23.56
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.16
174.02
1155. C
13.25
21.48
COLD STABIL1ZEC
GRAB'S
e.3i
49.91
1422.5
5.65
22.45
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
6.35
78.61
1163.5
1C.73
24.67
HCT STA6ILI2EC
CRAMS
7.55
69.14
1454.8
1C.42
21.C5 .
*4444444
4 4 4
4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
4*444
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE
EMISSICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NOX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37
CONC
1254
C.15
15.C5
3368
MASS
C.51
2.6?
361 .C4
8.27
24. 17
LCW CRUISE 23
CCNC
1C45
C.1C
13.71
624
MASS
C • 66
C.63
27C.C4
1.27
32.57
IDLE 0
CCNC
24 19
C.21
13.22
61
MASS
0.27
0.16
53.4E
C.C5
C.OC
COMPOSITE 2C
CCNC
14 44
C.17
829
MASS
C . 48
C.52
2.15
ALTCMCTIVF TEST INC I *ecRAT CP I ES
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC.
, INC.
ecci i
220
-------
TEST HfetR: EC234
CAR NLPEER: CC45
AFTEP
DYNAKONETER EMSSICN PEStLTS LSING .
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR PAKE fCOEl CYL C1C RPL CCC^R INRT RCHF A/C EVP E>H PCV TRANS
1970 VCLK. 160C 4 97 C 48204 250C 9.4 N N EK Y S-4
GRAPS PER VILF
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
HPG
1975 CCMFOSITE
2.43
24.e?
359.4
3 • C I
21.93
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
2.98
31.05
265 .C
2.e7
21. C4
SI fliLATEC 1972
HOT
2.CI
2C.1E
255.1
3.12
22.65
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.IC
173.85
1225.4
11.16
2C.93'
COLD STABILIZED
GRAPS
8.29
58.99
15C2.3
1C.35
21.15
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAP S
6.77
92.35
1161.1
13. C3
24.49
HOT STAEILIZEC
GR A K S
7.90
13 . C 2
1499.9
1C.67
21.11
*«*««***
~ * * ~
* * * * *
* * *
» * » * *
» * » * «
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-VCCE
•EMSS
ICN S
SPEED •
HC
CC
CC2
NC*
y pc
HIGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
941
C. 19
14.14
2726
MASS
0.77
2.5£
32C.46
6.11
27.24
LCVi CRUISE 23
CCNC
866
C. 1C
12.17
6 25
KASS
I.C9
1.22
25 7.25
1.69
23.9 C
IOLE C
CCNC
1685
C . 2 1
12.4 4
67
CASS
G.26
C.39
4«.84
C.C5
C. CC
COMPOSITE 20
CCNC
1069
0.17
714
MASS
C.47
I.C3
1.71
AUTCfCTIVF- TESTING L AHC!»A TCP I F S
19900 E. COLFAX, M.RCPA, CCLC.
, INC.
RCC1 I
221
-------
TEST NLM6ER: EC222
CAR ^EEP s CC46
eeFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESLLTS LSING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR PAKE MCDEL CVL CIC PRl CCCMP INRT PCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 OATS 51C 4 71 2 24774 2250 e.8 N N EM Y S-4
GRAMS PFR MILF HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMFOSITF 2.41 21 .CI 242.3 1.65 2 6. = C
SIMULATED 1^72 CCLC 2.71 29.18 26 6 .7 1.63 27.56
SIVULATEC 1972 HOT 2.19 25.46 257.4 1.66 29.26
CCLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
1 1 .98
127.19
941.3
6.54
27.57
COLO
STAEIL I 7EC
GP A*S
£.37
91.66
1C73.6
5.69
27.56
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
8.C4
99.43
657 .1
6.ec
31.29
HOT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
8.57
IC1.27
1C 4 2 .1
5.2C
2 7.91
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCRE EMSSICNS
SPEFD HC CC CC 2 NC»
PPG
UGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 3334
MASS 1.69
C.65 12.66 2CS2
9.C9 3C2.64 4.15
27.62
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 33C6
1.55 14.74
6C5
MASS 1.32 15. C7 199.e3 C.e3
39. I 1
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
3376
0.24
1.13 14.14
2.92 24.5C
81
C.C2
C.CC
CfMPrSITE 20 CCNC 3339 C.fil
MASS C.73 5.61
594
1.10
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRtTCP I ES, INC.
1990C E. COLFAX, il'PCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
222
-------
TEST MJPEEPs EC233
CAR M-feER5 CC46
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS LSINC-
1975 FEOEPAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL CHCMR INRT RChP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1*571 OATS 510 4 71 2 24797 22 5C 6.8 N N EM V S-4
GRAMS PEP PILE K CO CC2 N'CX MPG
1975 CCMFOSITE
2.20
28. 59
254.4
1,75
29. ce
SIMULATEC 1972
CCLC
2.72
32.11
2(4.1
1. 5 f
27.55
SI MIJLA TEO 1972
HGT
1.61
25.S3
247.C
1.87
3C.34
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
1 1.13
138.es
= 48.1
5.32
27. C5
CCLO STARlLIZEC
GRAMS
9.29
1C1.92
1C33.C
6.53
2P.C5
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
4.26
92.57
819.7
7.52
33.22
HOT STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
9.35
93.3e
1C54.6
fc .77
27.85
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSJICNS
SPEEO HC CC CC2 NCX
MFG
UGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 2e71
KA S S 1.7fl
C.85 14.41 2434
14.25 2£t .«5 5.72
26.32
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 3413
MASS 1.45
?.2C 13.28 777
18.2C 1S6.36 C.91
36.79
IDLE
0 CONC
MASS
3473
C.25
1 .49
2.65
12.5?
27.65
76
C .05
C.CC
CCMPOSITE
2C CCNC
MASS
3045
0.77
1.07
7.27
741
1 .46
AUTCMTTIVE TFSTING LAPTPATCP I ES , INC.
1S9CC E. CCLFAX, ALRCPit CCLC. 8CC11
223
-------
TEST M.KRERJ EC232
CAR NLMBER : CC47
etfCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESllTS LSINC
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLPES
YEAR MAKE MCHFL CYL CIC PPL fDCMP INP.T ROF A/C FVP EXt* FCV TRANS
1969 MERC CCMET 8 302 ? 24514 35CC |1.2 Y IV EH Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 CCMFdSITE
HC
5.34
ro
37. It
ce?
51C.E
NCX
4.74
MRG
15,IS
SIMULATED 1S72 CCLC
SIMULATED IS7? HCT
5.32 42.9? 525.3 4. 7C 14,51
5. 35 32,95 496,S 4.77 15,75
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
21,25
197.91
16E4.1 IS. 1C
I A. 37'
CCLC
S T A e I L I 2 E C
CRA^S
le.ts
124. 5C
2C65.4 It,17
14,65
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
21.43
12 2 »f C
14.4C,S 19.43
17. 1C
HOT
STABILIZED
GRAMS
17.59
ICC.OC
1E7^ , 3 14,5E
14.43
* «
******
* • *
* * * «
* * * *
»*<«*<*»»
« « ~ ~ *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-"CCE EMJSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NC*
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CONC 3647
MA S S 4.26
0.5E 15.14 3221
17.6} 4S6.61 11.1?
1£ .5C
LCW CRUISF. 30 CCNC 4447
MASS
3.S3
C.5E 14.54 2324
S.ei 394,14 t.is
21. 1C
IDLE
0 CCNC 4844 C,21 11,79 ¦ IC5
I
mass i.oi c.ee e4.2i c,c7
o.oc
COMPOSITE 25 CC NC 3953 0 .46
MASS 2.15 £,Cf
1290
3.63
AU TC "CT I VE TESTING L«HCRATCRJE< , INC.
1990C E, CCLFAX, /*L»COA, CCLC, 3CC11
224
-------
TEST NI.PREP: EC23S
CAR NUPeER: CC47
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESLLTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR H«KE PCDEL CYL CIC RBI fCCP INRT RCFP A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1969 PERC CCMET 8 302 2 24541 350C 11.2 Y N EH Y A
GRAMS PER PILF
1975 CCPFOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
5.37 42.61 49C.5 4.£9 15.5C
SIPULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 197? HCT
5.96 44.26 5C4.7 A.91 15.CI
4.92 41.37 479.8 4.e7 15.99
COLD TRANS I FN'T GRAPS 24.44
CPLC STA61L I ZEC GRAPS 20.?7
HOT TRANSIENT GRAPS 16.42
HCT STA6IL IZEC GRAPS 19.37
*«»**»«««««*«*<
153.26 1794.6 19.95 15.36
178.67 1 c c c. 6 16.91 14.66
121.61 16C7.5 19;tl 17.41
12e.?7 1966.7 17.12 15.36
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE EPISSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NO
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 3786 C.82 14.44 35C7
MASS 4.22 <2.22 492.99 12.14
16.45
LOW CRUISE 30 CCNC 4273
MASS 2.74
C.61 14.C6 2943
12.1C 367.44 7.eC
21.37
IOLE
0 CCNC
MASS
2645
0.48
c.ie
C .4C
13.39
7C.29
149
C.12
c.cc
CCPPCS1TE 25 CCNC 3630 C.64
MASS 1.69 7.27
1533
4.16
AUTCPCTIVE TESTING LAeCP11 CP I ESt INC.
19S0C F. CCLFflX, «i«CRl>t CCLC. 8CC11
225
-------
TEST NLMPEP: EC240
CAR Mi^eFP: CC48
BfFCRE
CYNAMCMETER EN IS S IC r FFSILTS t-SINC
1975 FEOERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCPEL CYL CIC PPG
4.33 67.74 376.3 1.46 16.81
SIMULATEO 1972 COLC 4.68
SIfULATEC 1972 HCT 3.92
<5^. 5C 391.3 1.44 15.95
81.14 268 .5 1.48 17.52
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 2C.66 378.5? 132e.2 6.37 16.35
COLD STARILWEC GRAMS 15.94 345.1! 16C6.2 4.45 15.59
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 13.44 263.39 1157.E 6.67 2C.14
HOT STAPILI7EC GRAfS 14.77 314.45 1592.5 4.41 16.C7
ANALYSIS CF KF Y-M CDE. EM SS I CN S
SPEEO KC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 3925
MASS 3.47
3.C6 11.72 1492
63.4C 342 .78 4.25
19.64
ICk CRUISE 3C CCNC 3821
MASS 3.11
3.49 E.35
61 .96 234 .4E
1.29
26.Ct
IDLE
0 CPNC 1393 2.24 9.78 56
MASS 0.24 15.85 lCe.54 C.C4
C.CC
CCMPCSITE ?5 CCNC 3453 2.81
MASS 1.36 32.85
448
1.24
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING I APTRA 7 CP I ES , INC.
1990C E. COL FAX, 4LRCRA, CCLC. 8CC 11
226
-------
TEST M;»»eEP: EC245
CAR NLMPFR J CC4 8
iFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION RESLLTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL cm BPL CCCMH INRT RCFF A/C EVP E FCV TRANS
1968 WERC CCMET 6 200 1 35997 35CC 11.2 N N A! V S-3
GRAMS PEP PILE
HC
cc
CC2
NC>
MPG
1975 CCMFOSITE
5.C3
74.97
366.5
2.3C
17.ec
SIMULATEC 1972
COLC
5.71
87.72
379.6
2.15
16.62
SIMULATED 197?
HOT
4.52
65.34
356.4
2.41
IE. 81
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
24.4?
3e5.07
1356.C
9.14
15.95
COLO STARILIZtC
GRAMS
18.43
272.ee
1492.5
7.CC
17.32
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.45
217.17
118C.4
11. C6
2C.7C
HOT STAPILIZFC
GRAMS
16.38
255.45
1534.9
7.58
17.25
ANALYSIS QF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NO
MPG
HIGH CRUISF 45 CONC ^tC3C
MASS 2.61
2.9C 11.51 1627
48.2C 346.27 2.95
20.67
LCK CRUISE 3C CCNC 4169
3.31 8.37
6E9
MASS 3.57 58.2? 247.75 1-85
25.4C
IHLE
0 CCNC 3237 C.41 E.76 240
MASS C. 82 14.24 11C . 1 <3 1.C2
o.oc
COMPOSITE
2 5 CCNC
MASS
39CC
i.ec
2.35
27.61
599
1 .CC
AUTCMCT1VE TESTING LADCPA TCP I ES , INC.
1990C E. CfLFAX, SIRCPA, CCLC. 30C11
227
-------
TEST MMBER: EC241
CAR NUHEEP: CC49
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PFSLLTS LSINC
IS75 FECEPAL TEST FPCCECUSES
YEAR MKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL ("COR IMT PCt-P A/C EVP EXW PCV TRANS
19f>8 ORY NFUYG 8 383 4 38455 45CC 12.7 Y K EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCNFCSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX MFC
6.74 79.76 564.6 3.5C 12. IE
SIMULATED 1*972 CCLC
SIMULATED 197? HCT
8.21 82.04 597.C 3.21 11.64
5.63 78.C3 5 7 5 .3 3. 72 12.44
CCLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 39.CI 324.52 2C27.6 9.E4 12.1C
COLO STABILIZED GRAMS 22.59 28C.SC 2439.8 14.22 11.61
HCT TRANSIENT GR/MS 19.66 3C4.44 1874.9 12.66 12.46
HOT STAEILIZEC GRAMS 2 1 . 73 262.22 2272.; 12.C1 12.C2
*** **** **44*****4444444444 4 4*444*
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE .EPISS1CNS
SPEED t-C CC CC 2 NO
MPG
UGH CPU ISF 49 CCNC 38S1
2.9C 12.2e 1627
MASS 4.64 7e.24 535.57 6.7;
12.22
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 4C64 2.CI 13.51 1492
MASS 4.17 46.76 435.67 4.98
17. C5
I OLE
0 CCNC 4238 3.4C 11.54 51
MASS C•90 15.76 65.21 C.C7
C.OC
CCMFCS IT E 27 CCNC 3972 2. 75
MASS 2.25 34.65
7 3 E
2.42
AUTCHCTIVfr TESTING LAECPMCP1ES, INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
228
-------
TEST M.M8ERJ EC246
CAP NLMeEP: CC45
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EM.ISSICN PESllTS USING
1575 FEDERAL TEST FPCCEOLRES
YE«R MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC RPL CDCMR INRT RCHF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1968 Cf-RY NEWYC 8 383 4 ' 38471 4 5CC 12.7 Y N EM Y 4
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 COMPOSITE
K CC CC2 NCX PPG
£.51 54.5C 6C1.E 3.15 11.55
SIMULATED 1572 COLC
SI MIILA TEC 1572 HCT
7.71 112.15 61C.C 2.87 1C.55
5.6C 81.IE 555.6 3.36 12.C2
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
35.38
546.14
2C4S.2
6. 16
1C.77
COLD
STABILIZED
GRAMS
22.42
255. C2
2 52 6 .C
13.4C
11. 2C
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.61
313.e4
154C.6
11.81
13. C2
HCT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
22.43
32C.55
242 E . 2
11.55
11.42
• *
*44*44
* 4 «
* * 4 *
* * * 4
4 4 4 *4
4*444
4 4 4*
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSIONS
SPEED HC CO CO 2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC 2925 3.31 12.85 1125
MASS 4.77 9C.ee 515.61 4.7C
13.14
LCH CRUISE 33 CCNC 2960 2.66 12.C5 1C1C
MASS 4.15 65.64 426.78 3.C4
16.21
IDLE
0 CGNC 4169 4.C6 11.16 67
PASS 1.01 21.73 53.42 C.C5
C.CC
CCWPCSITE 27 CCNC 1972 3.21
MASS 2.3C 44.35
t ie
1.64
AUTC^CTJVF TESTING LARCRATCPIES» INC,
1S90C E. CCLFAX, UPCRA, CCLC. 6CC11
229
-------
TEST M*eERs E0212
CAR MifBEB: CC5C
eEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMSS1CN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
VF»P *AKE NCPEL CYL CIC BPL CCC^R INPT RCFP A/C EVP EXF FCV TRANS
1971 FCRC P INTD 1 91 1 326C9 225C 6.e N Y EC Y S-1
CRA«S PER KILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CC CC2
1.60 22.<17 2S2.S
NCX NPG
2.36 25.91
SIPULATEC 1972 COLC
SICULATEC 1972 HCT
4.92 32; 1C 3 C1 • 1 2 .28 21.26
1.35 15.2C 266.5 2.12 27.31
CCLD TRANSIENT GPAMS 16.C2 191.12 1C32.C
COLD STABILI2EC GRAPS 2C.90 16.32 1226^2
HOT TRANSIENT GRAKS 11.70
HOT STAPILIZEC GRAfS 20.2C
67.6E 537.1
53. C£ 166C.6
€.27
8.61
9.3 l
6.3C
23.12
25.11
3C.CE
18.96
««*444«**44*44**444444*444*4*4*4*
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEC FC CC CC2 NCX
NPG
FIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 2615
MASS 1.79
C.76 13.91 26ft
12.29 295.75 5.99
27.77
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 2127 C.52 13.76 593
PASS 1.21 6.2e 215. E? C.91
36.7£
IDLE
0 CCNf 1313 C.16 11.16 91
MASS C.71 C.56 37.56 C.C5
C.CC
CC^PPSITE 20 CCNC 2932 C.fC
KASS 1.C5 1.13
711
1.55
AITCPCTIVE TESTIKC LA ECPATCR IES, I NC.
1990C E. C CL F A X » ' LRCR'» CCLC. 0CO11
230
-------
TEST M'PBER: EC252
CAR MJ^eER: CC50
AFTER
OYNAPCMETER FMSSICN RESLLTS ISINC
I«;75 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR WAKE KCOEL CYL CIC Bet CDC^P INRT PChF A/C EVP EXt- PCV TRANS
1971 FCRC. PINTO 4 94 1 3262? 225C E.8 N Y EN Y S-4
GRAPS PER KILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
PPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
2.50
25.29
31C.5
3.C8
24.E6
SIMULATED 1972
COLC
2. 79
31.6E
316.C
3.C6
23.77
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
2.2R
2C.4e
3C6.4
3.C9
25.76
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAPS
11.79
149.01
1C35.4
11.52
24.87
COLD STAeiL I JEC CRA^S
9.15
ee.tc
1334.9
11.44
22. ei
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAFS
7.95
64.9e
962.6
11.72
29.82
HOT STABIL1ZEC GRAPS
a.eo
151.8C
1355.5
11.2 C
21.14
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-PCDE
¦EMSSICNS
SPEEO
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
27 84
C .67
14.11
3C36
PASS
1.96
10.57 .
296.79
i.ee
27.86
LCV. CRUISE 23
CCNC
32C2
1.C7
13.33
59 5
MASS
1.33
14.57
199 .23
c.et
39.35
IDLE 0
CflNC
267C
1.42
13.C5
116
PASS
0.23
3.56
41.97
C.C5
C.OC
CCPFCSITE 20
CCNC
28C8
C .62
783
PASS
C.7S
6.54
1.97
AUTCPCT I VF TESTING LAECPATCPIES
1990C E. COLFAX, «LRCRA, CCLC.
, INC.
3CC11
231
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC243
CAP MMEER: C051
e E F C R E
CYNAMCMETER EMISSION pesllts ISINC
1975 F EDFR AL TEST FPCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE MCTEL CYL CIC RRL CCCfP INRT PChP A/C EVP EXK PCV TRANS
1
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 17
CCNC
37eft
4.C3
12.16
2169
MASS
2.86
74.47
322.19
5.62
19.87
LOW CRUISE 23
CCNC
1C 4 2 €
3.93
1C.CE
139.6
MASS
6.33
57. 5C
212.2C
2.4C
27.61
IDLE C
CGNC
29965
8.47
3.92
22
MASS
8.4 1
22.41
14.7C
C.C2
C.CC
COMPOSITE 20
CCNC
9255
4.63
ecc
MASS
6.73
3 9.34
1.75
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LAPCRATTPIES
199CC E. CfL FAX, fl IR C R /"» CCLC.
, INC.
8CC 1 1
232
-------
TEST NLMBER: EC253
CAR NLPEER: CC51
AFTER
OYNAMOMETER FMISSICN FESILTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECL3ES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL i
196B OPEL 'KAOET 4
riD BPL
91 2
CCCMR IN. IT
46459 225C
ROP
e.e
A/C EVP EXI-
N N NO
PCV TR
Y S
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CO
CC2
NC*
MPG
1975 CCMPCSITE
17.C2
98.52
295.4
2.97
17.67
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
17.55
LC9.15
282. C
2.92
17.49
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
It.£2
SC.51
3CE.4
3. CI
17.8C
COLO TRANSIENT
GR AM S
52.68
366.21
1C25.2
12.43
18.39
CCLO STAEILIZEC
GRAf S
79.98
452.3e
ices.E
9.47
16.72
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
45.7C
22t. A3
12CC.S
13.12
19.1C
HOT STA8ILI7FD
GRAfS
et. £2
4 33.32
1393.6
1C.35
14.59
********
* * *
* * * *
* * * * 4
* * »
*****
* * * *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE
E* ISS ICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NC>
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
4169
4.42
11.92
1E99
MASS
3.35
74. 16
321 .et
4.91
19.83
LOW CRUISE 23
CGNC
1CC79
6.52
9.3C
682
MASS
4.88
87.C4
192 .e9
1.23
25.61
IDLE 0
CCNC
'25 fi 62
8.47
4.92
4 A
MASS
7.33
36.5C
25.79
C.C3
C.OC
CCMPCSITE 20
CCNC
6 7 A3
5.17
562
MASS
6.04
51.51
1.35
AtlTCMCTIVE TESTING LA0CRMCP IES
19*500 E. CCLFAX, AIRCPA, CCLC.
, INC.
eccu
233
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC244
CaP MMeER: CC52
eEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCOE L CYL CIC REL CCCMP ! N;RT POF A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1968 FfRC FAIRL f
2P9 2 42
232 35CC
11.2
y N EM
i A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NC>
MPG
1«;75 COMPOSITE
5 .57
36.6 1
511.7
3.69
15.17
SI MULATFD 191?
COLC
6.30
51.92
SIS.5
3.49
1^.34
SIMULATEC 1972
HCT
5.C2
25.C7
5 C 5 . E
3.03
15.87
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAM S
27.33
298 .5 E
17E2.2
13.66
13.9C
COLO STABILIZEC
GPA^S
IS.S3
9C.82
2114.C
12.51
14.78
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
17.72
97.17
1679.6
16 .19
17.21
HOT STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
19.40
89.22
2132.1
12. eo
14. 6S
« « 4
« 4 « » »
« « * «
* * *
» » * *
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
EMISSIONS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NOX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45
CONC
4516
C .83
13.76
2324
MASS
5.CI
26.3E
4 E1.6 4
8.47
16.52
LCVi CRUISE 30
CCNC
2aas
C.35
13.56
1415
MASS
2.62
8.44
364.79
3.92
23. C5
IDLE 0
CONC
1497
0.43
13.53
163
MASS
C.45
1 .19.
£6.58
C.ll
C.CC
CC«PCSITE ?5
CCNC
3794
C .66
e96
MASS
1.87
8.31
2.66
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA3CRATCPIES
1990C E. r.CLFIX,
-------
TEST MM8FRS EC251
CAR NLMPER s CC52
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PESILTS USINC
1575 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC BRL rDCMR INRT RChiF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1*568 FCRC FAIRL 8 289 2 4232C 350C 11.2 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP KILE
K
CO
CC2
NO
MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
5.27
33.61
5C3.6
3.60
15.54
SIMULATFC 1972 COLC
5.67
35. C5
52C.2
3.69
14.85
SIMULATED 197? HCT
4.58
29.4e
451. C
3.53
16.1C
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS
22.e4
186.61
1865.1
15.57
14.57
CCLD STAPILI7EC GRAMS
15. 66
1C6.5 7
2C36.5
11.7C
15.13
HOT TRANSIENT GR«MS
17.67
114.55
1646.C
14.77
17.27
HOT ST&BILI2FC GRAMS
15. B2
117.76
2C82 .2
1C.82
14.72
***,********
4*4*
~ * * *
* * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-»CDE EMISSICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 45 CONC
4899
0.54
13.76
2324
MASS
5.24
30.76
477.55
7.53
16. 4C
LOW CRUISE 3C CCNC
5212
C • 87
13.15
1463
MASS
4.36
2C.12
364.57
3.68
21.72
IOLE 0 CONC
3126
1.61
13.33
136
MASS
C.56
7.12
64.31
C.ll
C.OC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC
4tC5
1.C1
858
MASS
2.16
14.45
2.5C
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L Af?C R ATCR I E S , INC.
19900 F.. COLFAX, AIRCPA, CCLC. 3CC11
235
-------
1FST MMBEP: EC251
C»R KLMPEP: CC£3
BEFCPE
CYNAMC^ETER EMISSION PESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YE«R M AK E MCDEL CYL CIC BBL CCCMP INR T RCI-P A/C EVP E>H FCV TRANS
1972 VCLVQ 112S 1 121 2 19175 275C 9.9 N Y EM Y S-1
GRAMS PER HUE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
8.28 £7.54 262.9 1.23 19.89
SIMULATEC 1972 COLC 8.11
SIMULATED 1972 HGT 8.16
89.11 293.5 1.24 19.35
66.36 274 .6 1.14 2C.33
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 26.ft 279.33 ICeS.C 6.61 20.21
CCLO STAfllLIZEC GRAMS 36.ie 389.2C 1114.3 3.12 16.6C
HPT TRANSIFNT GRAMS 21.69 256.51 9 5 E . 1 5. 15 22.51
HOT STABILIZFC GRAMS 36.C5 363.61 12C1.1 3,62 17.81
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE -EMISSIONS
SPEED hC CC CC2 NO
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CONC
MASS
1313 3.66 12.19 1115
3.19 66,37 3C8.23 2.77
21.C7
LOW CRUISE 23 CONC 58C3
MASS 3.C9
6.21 1C. 13 2Ce
82.75 191.41 G.34
26.87
IDLE
0 CCNC 23637
MASS 3.19
8.17 6.92 11
19.69 26 • 63 C.C3
o.oc
COMPOSITE
2C CCNC
MASS
6CC9
3.37
1.61
38 .31
291
C.71
ALTCMCTIVE TESTING LAPCPATCR I ES , INC.
1990C E-. CCLF4X, HPCRA, CCIC. 8CC11
236
-------
TEST MCBEB: EC262
CAR MJ*£ERs CC53
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS li ? IM C-
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC PPL CDCMR INRT RCI-F A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
197? VCLVC 1A2S A 121 2 19195 275C 9.9 N Y EK Y S-A
GRACS PEP ULE t-C CO CC2 NCX MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
A.73
tt.et
3C7.A
1.53
2C . £3
SIMULATEC 1972 CCLC
A.93
67.5C
nt.3
1.67
2C.2A
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
A.59
66.3 7
299.2
1.A2
21. 3C
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS
16.99
ZC9.55
11A1.6
6.C2
21.32
fCLD STABILIZED GPA«S
19.SS
296.6C
12A5.5
A.5C
19.32
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS
IA. A 2
201.11
996.E
6.1A
23.9C
HCT STAPILIZEC GPAfS
19.87
288.73
1173.1
A.23
2C.29
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE fMIJSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 3752
MAJS 2.75
2.7E 12.61 1 AAA
A9.56 .325.29 3.51
21.62
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC A516 A.77 11.36 12A
MASS 2.A1 40.37 22C.2S C.37
27.59
IDLE
0 CCNC 5212 6.17 1C.CA 63
MASS C.53 15.13 37.57 0.C3
C.OC
COMPOSITE 2C CCNC A09* 3.A7
MASS 1.3C 28.75
359
c.ee
AUTCMCTIVF TESTING LAPCPATCR I ES , INC.
199CC F. CTL FAX, /*IRCP*, CCLC. 8CC11
237
-------
TEST NLMBER: EC255
C«P NCMEER: CC54
REFCPE
0YN4MCMETER E^ISSICN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST"FPCC ECLR E S
YEAR MAKE MTDEL CYL CIC BEL CDCMR INPT RCFF A/C EVP E>H PCV TRANS
1971 MERC KCNTE 8 400 2 9939 4JCC 12.7 Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMFCSITE
HC
4.CI
cc
58. n
CC2
594.9
NO
3.49
MPG
12.74
SICULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 19 72 HOT
4.45 69.37 fclt.C 2.3e 12.C5
3.(7 49.65 578 .S 4.33 13.32
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 19.C6 291.C3 2216. 2 2.13 11.e9
CCLO STABILIZED G° AM S 14.34 229.22 ZAC4. ] 15.74 12.2C
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 13.1? 143.17 1937.7 It.72 14.75
HOT STABILIZED C-PAfS 13.36 2C4.1C 234 1 .9 13.55 12.66
* * * *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEED . HC CC CC2 NCX
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC 2075 C.65 14.53 3175
MASS 2.39 19.17 53e.95 11.84
15.44
LOU CRUISE 33 CCNC 2245 C.9C 13.65 1685
MASS 1 .79 2 5. e 7 4 14 .25 4 .E3 19.34
IDLE
0 CCNC 275C 1.91 13.42 ICC
MASS C.32 7.47 77.78 C.11
O.CC
COMPnSITF ?7 CCNC 2216 C.e7
MASS 1.C1 12.43
1103
3.56
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCP IES, INC.
199CC E. COLFAX, ALPCRi, CCLC. 80C11
238
-------
TEST NLMRER: EC261
CiP MMeER: CC54
AFTER
DYMMPMETER EMISSICN RESULTS ISING
1575 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECliRES
YFAR MAKE . MCUEL CYL CIC eeL CCCfP I^RT PCI-P i/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1971 MFPC fCNTP 8 AOO 2 SS57 A5CC 12.7 Y Y EM Y A
CRAMS PER MILE
1575 CCMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 KCX CPG
3.A7 Aft.82 63A.C A.27 12.3S
SIMULATED 1S72 CCLC 3.80
SIMULATED 1572 HCT 3.23
57.68 6 52.1 4.23 11.8C
38.6! 62C.3 A.31 12.66
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.68
265.C2
221C.3
16.66
12.15
CCLD
ST A EILI 2 EC
GRAMS
12.A3
167 .5";
26EC.A
13. C5
11 .AS
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11.27
122.26
1S71.7
,1<5.2A
1A . 7.J
HOT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
11.5A
162.25
2573.2
1A.ES
11.S7
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISJICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NC*
MFC
HIGH CRUISE AS CGNC 1915
MASS 2.A3
C.52 1A.53
29CA
13.73 66S.C5 11.21
iA.ee
LOW CRUISE ?3 CCNC 2CC2
MASS 2.61
C.61 1A.CE 176C
13. 3C A 3 A . £ A J.A3
19.21
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
205A
C.59
C.S2 IA.1A
6.A5 111.AC
1 E A
C. 15
C.CC
CCMPOSITE ?7 CONC 19A9 C.5E
MASS 1.26 S.C3
11C5
3.57
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LABCBATCR IES , INC.
1S9CC E. CCLFAX, fLRTRA, CCLC. 8CC11
239
-------
TEST NUPRER! EC258
CAP hUfeER: CC55
6 E FCF E
CYNAMDMETER FMISSICN RESULTS ISINC
1
-------
TEST NLMeER: EC267
CAR HUMeER: CC55
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PESLLTS LS1NG
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR M AK E HCDEL CYL CIC BRL CCCMP IMU RCHP »/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 PCNT SAFAR 8 400 4 1C687 5C0C 13.A Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PER MUE
1975 CCMFCSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX >PG
3.85 35.62 7C5.3 5.51 11.51
SIMULATED 1972 CCIC 4.35
SIMULATED 1972 KCT 3.47
47.14 718.6 4.78 11.04
26.93 eS!.C t.CS 11.9C
COLD
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
18.20
24C.94
244C.2
IE.42
11. 3C
COLD
STABILIZED
GRAMS
14.41
112.64
2«=51.C
17.41
io.ec
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11.6?
89.34
2261.7
2E.CC
13.33
HOT
STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
14.63
113.C5
29C3.9
17.35
1C.96
ANALYSIS CF KEY-KDE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 2141
MASS 2.96
C.22 13.91 3446
6.86 6C7.74 14.59
14.16
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 2576 C.36 13.£5 1E3
MASS 2.81 IC.C3 47E.S7 6.4
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
CCMFCSITE 27 CCNC
MASS
2958 1.94 12.83 9
0.80 11.59 114. E2 C.l
2336 C.54 119
1.56 10.23 4.48
17.6e
C.CC
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCP I ESt INC.
I190C E. CCLFAX, ALSCPA, CCLC. qCCll
241
-------
TEST M>BEP: EC259
CAR NLMEER: CC56
EEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESILTS CSINC
IS75 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CVL CIC PPL CCCMP INRT RCt-P A/C EVP EXh PCV TPANS
1968 BUIC SPEC I 8 350 2 23*93 35CC 11.2 N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILF
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX PPG
3.82 78.82 4e5.7 2.20 11.33
SIMULATED 1972 COLC 4.41
SIMULATEC 19 7? HOT 3.36
93.92 497.8 1.98 13.51
67.44 476.t 2.2i 15.CI
enLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 18.42
CCLO STAeiLIZEC GRAMS 14.49
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 10.73
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 13.64
373.31 ltEfc.6 7.£2 13.94
321.CI 2C46.4 7.C5 13.12
174.73 1527.9 1C .6 7 17.7C
306.79 1993.6 6.88 13.61
ANALYSIS CF KEY-NCDE EMSSICNS
SPEEC . HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2054 C.71 14.14 2169
MASS 2.19 17.C4 486.CC 7.40
17. 14
LCK CRUISE 30 CCNC
2629
1.52 13.42
MASS 2.36 28.42 375.54
56 5
1.78
20.82
IDLE
0 CCNC 4273 5.6f 9.12 61
MASS 0.65 19.97 55.16 C.C4
C.CC
CCMF0SITE
25 CCNC
MASS
2519
1.22
1 .67
2C.16
594
2.CI
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCPIESt INC.
199QC E. COLFAX, «LRCP/S CCLC. RCC11
21*2
-------
TEST HP8EP: FC266
CAR NUPPER: CC56
AFTER
CYNAMOMETER EM I SS ICh RESLLTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCEOCRES
YEAR VAK E PflDFL CYL CID BPL CCCMR I;NRT RCFP A/C EVP EXH PC\I TRANS
1968 BUIC SPEC I 8 350 2 235 10 35CC 11.2 N N EH Y A
GRAPS PER HUE HC CO CC2 NCX HPG
1975 COMPOSITE
2.90
44.C3
53C.7
2.45
14.62
SIHULATEC 1972
CCLC
3.5C
65.35
54C.9
2.18
13.6C
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
2.44
27.94
523 .C
2.66
15.5C
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAVS
16.54
369.06
1762.8
6.25
13.57
CCLO STAPILIZEC
GRANS
9.75
121.07
2293.6
e.ic
13.63
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
8.56
88.5C
1628.8
11.86
18.11
HC T STARILI2EC
GRAMS
8.67
103.72
2215.8
8.52
14.25
ANALYSIS CF KEY-KDE 5 IS S IC N S
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
fPG
HIGH CRUISE.45 CCNC 1984
HASS 2 . 1A
C.7t 14.14 2169
18.83 462.96 7.37
17.
LCh CRUISE 30 CCNC 187C
HASS 1.63
0.53 12.33 566
11.21 365.5C 2.12
22.94
IDLE
C CONC 1532 C.51 12.19 12C
MASS 0.38 2.26 83 .A4 C.C9
C.OC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 1B90 0.65
HASS C.96 7.11
614
2.1C
AUTCNCTIVE TESTING LARCRA 1CR IES , INC.
1990C F. COLFAX, A L R l R A , CCLC. 9CCU
2U3
-------
TEST MfeEP: EC26C
CAB MME ER: CC57
eEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER FMISSICN PESLLTS LSINC
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR M/iKE fCCEL CYL CIC B8L CCCMP INRT RCKP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 CHF. \i IMF4L 8 350 4 35553 ACOC 12.C Y K EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMPPSITE
5.C7
9c.c;
45C.3
2.96
14.65
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
5.94
1C2.5C
455.C
2.5 6
14.C3
SIMULATEC IS72
HOT
4.41
0C.65
446.7
3.25
15.16
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
2 A . S f»
384.09
1521.9
'9.58
14.75
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
19.59
3e4.fet
189C.6
9.77
13.41
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13. 46
22C.23
1455.8
14.56
17.59
HOT STAB ILIZEC
GRAMS
18.35
342.2 J
1661.9
1C.E4
13.95
4*444*44
* * *
4 4 4 4
* * * * *
4*4*
* 4 ~ *
4 4 4 4 4
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCOE
EMSSICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MFG
UGH CRUISE 19
CQNC
2854
1.17
14.35
2788
MASS
2.87
26.49
456.36
8.99
17.56
LCW CRUISE 33
CCNC
334 1
1.C4
14.14
1744
MASS
2.60
23.81
3 41.C 1
3.99
23.C3
I OLE 0
CONC
5559
7.13
9.9 2
82
MASS
C. 90
2 7.C9
56.e9
0.05
o.oc
COMPOSITE 27
CCNC
3398
2.IE
1C39
M/l ss
1.58
26.56
2.76
AUTCNCT I VE TESTING L AeCRMCR I-ES .
INC.
1990C P. COLFAX, AlRCPf, CCLC. ffCCll
2UU
-------
TEST MjMeER: EC265
CAP MifeEP: CC57
AFT Efl
CVNAMCMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS LSIKC
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE
1969 CHFV
MCDEL CYL CIC BPL CDCMRINRT PCH
IMFAL 8 350 4 35976 4CCC 12.
GRAMS PER KILE
HC
CO
cc
1975 CCMPOSITE
3.72
4C.I7
516
2
2.62
15.07
SIMULATED 1972 CGLC
4.53
59. 3C
517
2
2.22
14.25
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
3.10
25.73
515
c
2.93
15.74
COLD T°Af*S I EKT GRAMS
21.17
332.75
1676
7
7.64
14.33
CGLD STAEILI2EC GRAMS
12.84
112. C2
22CC
2
9.C2
14.19
HOT TRANSIEM GRAMS
1C.4C
ec-ss
U45
7
12.95
17. ec
HOT STABILIZE!! GPAMS
11.C2
72.26
221C
4
9.69
14.54
A/C EVP EXH PCV TRAKS
V K EM Y A
NCX
MPG
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE E^ISSlC^S
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 2548
MASS 2.67
0.56 14.59 2556
12.76 456.53 6.C2
16.31
LCH CRUISE 23 CCNC 3167
MASS 2.66
C.9C 14.14 1453
18.35 25S.92 2.56
22.42
IDLE
C CCKC
MASS
1727
0.48
C.ll 14.26
C .64 96.91
195
C. 16
C.CC
CCMFCSITE 27 CGNC 2464
MASS 1.26
C .49
964
2.53
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING IAfiCPeTCR IES , INC.
199CC E. CCLFAX, AL°CRA, CCIC. flCCll
2k5
-------
¦JEST NUMPEPs EC263
CAR NUMBER: CC58
EEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS LSING
l<375 FEDERAL TEST PRCCEDLRES
YEAR **«KE MCCEL CYl tin BBL CCCMP INR T RC»-P A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 OLDS CELTA 8 455 2 11323 4C0C 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP KILE HC CC CC2 NGX MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
5.53
125.89
557.1
2.46
11.53
SIMULATEC 1972
CCLC
6.33
129.12
575.<
2.42
11.15
SIMULATEC 1972
HOT
4.92
123.44
543.2
2.48
11.83
COLO TRANS IFNT
GRAMS
26.31
4C6.44
2CCe.7
1C.7C
11 • 9 C
CCLD STAB IL12EC
GRAMS
21.17
561 .96
23Ce.l
7.4e
1C.52
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.73
363.87
1765 .E
11.13
13.62
HOT STABILIZEC
GRAMS
20.41
552.55
2225.9
7.22
10.85
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMJSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NC>
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CONC
MASS
28C2 2.67 13.19 1659
3.36 72.87 53C.46 7.95
13.5£
LOW CRUISE 33 CGNC 3202
2.87 12.92
£64
MASS 3.10 i2.lt 42J.34 2.75
16.71
inLE
0 CCNC 4343 6.C7 S.92 72
MASS 0.97 32.95 e4.11 0.07
0.0C
COMPOSITE 27 CONC 3125 3.18
MASS 1.8C 46.18
586
2.22
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCP 1ES, INC.
199CC E. COLFAX, ALRCR A , CCLC. SCCll
2U6
-------
TEST NLMBEP: EC276
CAR NUMBER: ocse
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMSSICN PEHLTJ ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR WAKE MCCEL CYL CIC eeL CCCMP I NO T R CI- P A/C EVP £*K PCV TRANS
1969 OLDS HELTA 8 455 2 113A7 4CCC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER *ILE
IS 75 CCMPOS1TF
HC CC CC2 NC> MPG
4.42 1C4.96 55 9.9 2.S3 12.05
SIMULATED IS72 COLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
5.C8 112.53 5eS.3 2.9C 11.38
3.92 99.29 537.1 2.55 12.61
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 21.13 4C0.12 1S63.3 12.46 12.1?
COLD STAPILIZEC GRAMS 16.99 442.ee 2426.7 9.22 1C.76
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 12.39 3CC.76 1596.1 12.EC 15.42
HOT STAEILIZFC GRAMS It.54 412.e4 2444.9 9.72 1C.9C
444444*4*44* 4 4 *44444444444444444
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISJICNS
SPEEC l-C CC CC 2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 27 32
MASS
2.tf 13.28
3.26 61 .20 52C.e7
1821
7.C 6
14. 2C
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3167 2.82 12.El 99C
MASS 2.83 62.45 4C3.9C 2.92
17.43
IDLF
0 CCNC 2437 2.67 12.45 117
MASS C.58 16.99 HE.98 C.12
C.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 2725 2.55
MASS 1.50 33.C9
665
2.17
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LARCRA TCP I ES, INC.
199CC E. CDLFAX, JIRCP*. CCLC. fiCCU
2k7
-------
"IE£ 1 NLPPEP: EC264
CAR NUMBER: CC59
6 EFCRE
CYNAMOMETER EPISSITN PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECURES
YEAR PAKE PCDEL CYL CIC eRL CCCPR INRT PCFF t/C EVP E XF PCV TRANS
1968 PCNT TEPPE 8 350 2 77<=68 4CCC 12.C Y N E P Y A
GRAMS PER PILE HC CC CC2 NC> PPG
19 75 COMPOSITE 6.74 86.^8 52C.7 1.69 13. 14
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC 9.28 £4.44 533.9 1.65 12.79
SIPULATEC 1972 HCT 4.81 88.C3 51C.E 1.72 13.4C
COLD TRANSIENT GRAPS 51.C6 31C.4C 1761.9 6.C2 13.4e
CCLD STA8IL12EC GRAPS 18.58 322.e 7 2242.4 6.35 12.21
HOT TRANSIENT GRAPS 17.54 337.34 15EE.4 6.5E 14.95
HCT STAPILIZEC GRAvS 16.EC 247. 74 2U4.6 6 .68 13.15
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE EPISSICNS
SPEEC HC CO CC2 NCX PPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 35C8 2.7E 12.92 1316
PASS 4.17 74.23 4E3.65 4.76 14.52
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 3C63 C.9C 13.33 1125
PASS 2.71 2C.91 395.51 3.CC 20.3e
IDLE 0 CCNC 2952 C.48 11.66 121
PASS C.79 1.61 76.9C C.C8 C.CC
COPFCSIT E 27 CONC 336C 2.C2 £C9
PASS l.e7 21.96 1.64
AUTOPCT J VE TESTING LA ECKtTCP IES , INC.
1990C E. COL F A X » aiRCPA, CCLC. 8CC11
2k8
-------
TEST NUMBER: £0275
CAR NUMBER: 0C59
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
IS75 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR HAKE MCDEL CYL CIC BBL CCCMPINRT PCHF i/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1968 PONT TEHPE 8 350 2 779eC 4CCC 12.C Y N EH Y A
GPAMS PFR M I LF HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.34
66.66
56C.5
1.9 5
12. 4e
SIMULATED 197?
CCLC
6.64
90. A2
573.6
1.82
12. ce
SIMULATED 1972
(-CT
4.16
e3.52
55C.6
2.C4
12. 8C
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
32.37
373.27
1E46.1
6.46
12.82
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
17.4C
2C7.f«
2456.1
7.2C
11.45
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.32
318.£5
1672.4
8.12
14.63
HOT STABILIZED
GRAMS
i5.es
255 .Cfc
2416. C
7.41
11.96
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE EMSSICNS
SPEEO HC CC -CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CONC 3429 2.9E 12.81 1280
MASS A.26 84.E6 455.43 1.7C
14.79
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 26e0
mass 2.;;
C.88 13.42 1C £7
2C.6E 294.36 3.C5
2C.46
IDLE
0 CONC
MASS
2297
0.7C
C.61 12.23
4.16 1C £ . 9 6
2 14
C. 17
O.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CONC 3151 2.17
MASS 1 .82 26.?3
633
l.CC
AUTCCTIVE TESTING LAHCRATCR I ES. INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, />LRCP£, CCLC. 8CC11
2U9
-------
TEST MfPEB: EC272
CAR NLPfiER: CC6C
BEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER E^^ISSIC^ RESLLTS LSINC
1575 FFDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR "AKE MCOEL CVL CIC 8BL CCCf'P INRT RChP A/C EVP EXI- PCV TRANS
1969 DCOG DART 6 225 1 21739 3CCC 1C.3 N N EP Y A
GRAMS PER PILF
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC
. C 8
cc
5 2.2'
CC2
4C5.7
NC X
4.55
MPG
17.79
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC 5.52
SIMULATEC 197? HOT 2.99
7C -1 < I 4.C2 16.62
38.71 4C4.C 4.95 16.77
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 29.41 404.6f 1 23 5 .C
COLD STABILIZEC GRAMS 12.07 121.53 1724.2
HCT TRANSIENT GftAfS 1C.37
HOT STABILIZEC GRA^S 11.26
1C.26
19.87
168 .82 13C t . 2 17.25
SC.Si 1599.1 19.61
15.75
17.55
2C.26
19.29
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC 2 NC*
MFC
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2819
MASS 2.75
2.42 13.56 24C1
57.66 42C.26 7.78
17.14
LCW CRUISE 30 CCNC 3063
MASS 2.13
C .90 14 .23 2788
17.4<5 226.37 6. 23
24. 56
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
3126
0.52
C.9 £ 13.56
3.24 5C.49
232
C . 14
O.CC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 29C1 1.87
MASS 1.26 18.47
1320
2.92
AUTCfCT TVE TESTING LAeCRATCR I ES, INC,
19900 E. COLFAX, ALRCR/i, CCLC. 3C011
250
-------
TEST KfBER: EC284
CAP MMEER: CC60
AFTER
CVN4M0METER EMSSICN PESLLTS LSING
1 «575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE *CDEL CYL CIC PEL CCCKP INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 OCDG CART fc 225 1 21757 3CCC 1C.3 N N EM Y A
GRAMS PF.R MILE
1975 CCMFCSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX *PG
2.73 37.34 4C1.C 4.4C 15.C2
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC 2.57
SIMULATEC 15 72 HCT 2.54
42.34 416.6 4.43 1S.CE
33.57 365.2 4.37 IS.75
CCLD TR«NSIENT G»AMS 13.07
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 5.24
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 5.84
1-0T STAeiLIZFC GRAMS <3.26
263.CE 1462.5 14.34 16.56
54.4e 1662.4 ie.50 15.25
157.3C 1256.6 13.E7 2C.34
62.24 1646 .E 17.27 .15.31
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE -EMISSIONS
SPEED K . CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2722 2.62 13.35 244C
MASS 2.67 53.73 4C7.2E 7.25 17.81
LOW CRUISE 3C CCNC 3122
MASS 2.30
1.5C 13.71 2C52
26.81 315.45 4.68
24.41
IOLE
0 CCNC 1821 C.C5 12.72 20C
MASS 0.31 C.63 5C.17 C.1C
C.CC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 26C9 1.51
MASS 1.12 16.84
1121
2.51
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LA3CRA TCP IES, INC,
1590C E. COLFAX, fllKCRA, CCLC. eCCU
251
-------
TEST M'MPER: EC273
CAR M.M6EP: CC61
EEFCRF
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN PESLLTS IS INC
1975 FEDERAL TEST PPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL CDC R 1 NRT. RCHF A/C EVP EXH FCV TRANS
1970 3UIC ELECT 8 55 4 3B759 45CC 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PEP NILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
t-C CO CC2 NCX MPG
5.51 62.45 5 6 £.. 7 2.33 12.43
SI MJLATEC 197? CCLC 6.21
S1"ULAT FC IS72 HCT 4.96
97.26 574.6 2.C9 11.92
71.26 565 .9 2.5C 12.e4
COLO
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
27.64
372.28
ie4C.5
e .79
12.94
CCLD
STABILIZEH
GRAMS
18.95
3 5 7.33
247C.2
7.32
11. C9
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
18.42
177. ce
1774.C
11.44
15.4C
HOT
STABILI?EC
GRAMS
19.53
354.86
2394.5
6 .96
11.36
ANALYSIS CF KEY-CCDE EMSSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISF 4? CCNC 3439 1.59 13.14 1992
PASS 4.C9 61.96 4E6.34 7.54
14.92
LCK CRUISE 33 CCNC 43C8 3-4 A 12 . 19 624
PASS 4.21 7C.77 371.12 1.62
17.97
IDLE
C CCNC 2152 C.13 12.51 111
PASS 0;55 I.C4 ICC.68 C.ll
C.CC
CCMFCSITE 27 CCNC 3297 1.45
MASS 1.R2 24.CC
593
2.C9
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCPATCP I E S « IK.
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALKCPA, CCLC. RCCU
252
-------
TEST N L.M e E R: EC283
CAR NLIM E ER s CC61
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLITS LSING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR WAKE MCOEL CYL CIC BPL CCC*R INRT RChP A/C EVP EXt" FCV IRAK'S
197C BUIC ELECT 8 455 4 3e7£3 45CC 12.7 Y (\ EM Y A
GRAMS PER NILE
K
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
5.18
86.e*
6C4.5
2.73
11.76
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
5.48
97.6S
62C.2
2.63
11.25
SIMULATEO 1912
HCT
<1.60
78.67
592.5
2.8C
12.18
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
22.29
4CC.49
2021.9
11.74
11.94
CCLD STABILIZEC GRAMS
20.31
332.lt
2629.9
8 .CC
10.66
HCT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15. 66
257.es
i e 14. i
12.97
14.33
HOT STA8ILIZEC CRAMS
20.16
333.29
2 547.7
7.97
1C.94
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
EMISS
ICNS
SPEED
HC
CC
cr 2
NO
KPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
3126
1.64
13.76
2634
MASS
3. 76
52.Si
5CE.4C
8.58
14.76
LCV CRUISE 33
CCNC
4169
2.87
12.97
ess
MASS
3.95
58.3A
3E4 .26
2.75
18.23
ICLE 0
CCNC
24 02
c.ee
13.11
157
MASS
C.71
3.49
113.C5
C. 16
O.OC
COMPOSITE 27
CCNC
31C5
1.52
797
MASS
I.e2
21 .94
2.52
AUTC^CTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES
1990C E. COLFAX, ALPCPA, CCLC.
, INC.
eccn
253
-------
IfiSl UMBER: EC274
CAR MJMEER: CC62
EEFCRE
OYNAMCMETER FMISSICN RESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECCRES
YFAR MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC PPL CCCMP INRT PCKP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 CHEV IfPAL 8 400 2 132CC A £ C C 12.7 > Y EM Y A
GPAMS PFR MILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NCX PPG
4.54 43.9t fcEl.l 2.39 11.65
SIMULATFC 1972 CCLC 4.12
SIMULATEC 1972 HOT 4.86
64.13 7C2.5 3.C8 1C.91
26.7*1 465.1 2.42 12.27
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 20.20
COLD STAEILI2EC CRAMS 1C.69
HCT TRANSIENT GPAMS 25.78
HOT STABIL I ZEC GRAMS 35.<59
3et.99 2274.5 1C.78 11.03
94.01 21^3.
-------
TEST NLMBERs EC282
CAR NLMeER: CCf2
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE ITDEL CYL CtC PRL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP E*H PCV TPANS
1971 CHEV I^PAL 9 400 ? 13318 A?OC 12.7 Y Y EH Y A
GRAMS PFR HUE HC CO CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMFCSITF
2.99
44. 56
678.9
3.29
11.74
SIMIJL4TED 19 72
CCLC
3.20
50.45
6ec.c
2.97
11. 5f
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
2.63
4C. 12
678.1
3.54
11.87
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.S3
266.57
21C1.1
9.80
12.6e
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
10.19
111.79
299E.7
12.46
1C.69
HOT TRANSIFNT
GRAMS
11.C7
189. 12
2Cf7.3
14.11
13.44
HOT STABILIZED
GPAMS
9.20
£3.49
2725.C
11.18
n.ee
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCOE EMISSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NC>
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 222A
MASS 3.CC
1.77 14.14 16SS
59.91 612.C2 7.41
12.44
LCW CRUISE 33 CONC 16C2 0.25 13.51 1569
MASS 1.99 5.44 517. 6£ 5.28
16.72
IDLE
0 CCNC 2141 C.41 13.SI 315
MASS C. 6 7 1.44 97.59 C,24
C.CC
COMPOSITE
27 CGNC
MASS
2143
1.42
1.27
16.56
9 26
2.73
AtJTCfCTtVE TESTING L/»RCH ATCR I E S , INC.
199CC F. CCLFSX, AlPCRf, CCLC. 9C011
255
-------
TEST NLMPER: FC299
CAP NUMEER: CC63
BEFCRE
DYNAMCMETER FMISSICN FESLLTS ISING
1<57S FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIPES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC PPL CCCMP INRT RC(- F A/C EVP EXh FCV TRANS
1969 CHRY 3GC 8 383 4 34481 450C 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
1975 CCMPCS1TE
hC CC CC2 NCX MPG
6.66 11C.3* 5C7.6 1.44 12.6E
SIMULATEC 1972 COLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
8.17 IC8.39 518.5 1.35 12.At
5.52 1 11 .83 AS? .5 1.50 12.86
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 38.39 337.74 1744.4 4.5C 13.55
CCLD STAEILIZEC GRAMS 22.85 475.16 2142.1 5.62 11.5E
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 18.57 363.57 16C3. e 5.65 14.55
HOT STAEILIZEC GRAMS 2C.71 422 .23 2 133 .8 5 .59 11.9E .
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 4204
5.31 11.41
620
MASS 5.58 1C4.09 445.62 2.48
14. IE
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC 4134
MASS 5.62
3.88 12.27 675
79.63 3 E3 . 64 2 .71
16.91
IDLE
0 CCNC 3752 3.7C 12.16 75
MASS 1.65 17.94 87.15 C.C6
C.CC
CCMPC S1T E 27 CCNC
MASS
4114 4.6C
3.C6 46.55
39 2
1.C6
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LARCRATCPIFS , INC.
1990C E. CHLFAX, AI.RCSA, CCLC. 8CC11
256
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC301
CAR NUME ERs CC63
AFTER
OYNAMOMETER EMISSION PFSILTS USING
1<575 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDF L CVL CIO RSL CCCMR INRT RLI-P A/C FVP E XH PCV TRANS
1969 CHRV 300 fl 383 4 344S7 45CC 12.7 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CCMFOSME
HC
6.73
CO
87.17
CC2
£44.4
NCX
1.S4
MPG
12.67
SIMULATEC 1*572 CCLC 8.69
SIMULATED IS7? HOT 5.25
94.26 547.S 1.66 12.31
81.81 541.S 2.CC 12.S6
COLO TRANSIENT GRAMS 44. 65
CCLO STAEILI2EC GRAMS 20.53
HHT TRANSIENT GRAMS 18.£4
HOT STARILIZEC GRAMS IS. 54
319.54 18C7.6 6.34 13.26
387.55 23C1.5 7.6C 11.52
225.SS 1762.4 7.41 14.93
326.47 228 1.2 7.6S 12.CI
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSIONS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
MFG
UGH CRUISE 4S CCNC 4134 5.CI 11.S2 778
MASS 4.76 124.65 44S.85 2.85
13. 46
LOW CRUISE 33 CCNC 4566 4.53 12 .C5
7 C 1
MASS 4.13 6S • 3 < 367.6S 2.11
17.C6
IDLE
0 CCNC
MASS
3126
0.41
1.62 13.42
9.0C S3.6S
£8
C. 15
O.CC
COMPOSITE ?7 CCNC 3S98 4.CS
MASS 1.S1 46.61
378
1.1C
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRATCB IE J t INC,
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALR C I? A > CCLC. eCCll
257
-------
TEST M.MEER: EC300
CAR NLMEER: CC64
eEFCRE
0YNAMDMET ER FMISSICN RESULTS USI^G
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL CDCNR INRT RCHF A/C EVP EXH FCV TPANS
1970 FCRC KCVEP 6 250 1 257A0 2">5C 5.5 N N EM Y A
GRAMS FER CI IE K CO CC2 KCX KPG
1975 CCMPOSITE 2.56 26.C7 355.? 3.67 15.56
SIMULATED 1572 COLC 3. 16 33.57 4C6.1 3.e2 16.SI
SIMULATEC 1572 HCT 2.ei 2C.41 286.7 3.56 2C.82
COLO
TRANSIENT
GPAMS
12.37
193.54
144C.6
16.15
IE. 22
CCLC
STAPILIZEC
GRAMS
11.34
58.25
162C . 1
12.45
15.62
HOT
TRANSIENT
GRAMS
5.75
54.ei
128C.C
14.15
22.27
HOT
STAEIL I ZEC
GRAMS
1 1.03
61.92
1577.C
11.55
2C.06
ANALYSIS CF KEY-FCOE EMISJICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 KCX PPG
UGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 2917 1.55 13.73 2672
MASS 2.45 34.75 365.76 6.56 2C.8C
LOW CRUISE 23 CCNC 2153 C.51 14.26 533
MASS 1.56 6.36 25 1.5C 1 . 13 25. C2
I CLE 0 CONC 1828 O.CE 13.15 1C8
MASS C.29 C.35 51.14 C.C5 C.CC
COMPOSITE 20 CCNC 2642 I.C5 654
MASS C.53 9.6 £ 1.81
AUTCMPTIVE TFSTING L APC P t T C R. I E S , INC.
15SCC E. COLFAX, A LRTP i , CCLC. f? C C 11
258
-------
TEST MICPER: EC202
CAR KCeFP: CC64
AFTER
CYNACGCETEP EC ISS ICN PESILTS ISINC
1975 FEOERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR MAKE CCDEl CYl CIO Ret COCCR INRT RChP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRAMS
1970 FCPC CAVER 6 250 1 29e02 215C S.S N N EC Y A
GRAMS PER KILE
IS75 CCMPOSITE
HC
3.08
CC
2 7 .
-------
TEST NLMfiER: EC303
CAR NUMBER: 0C65
eEFCPE
CYN4MCMETEP FMISSIC* RESULTS USING
1975 FECERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE MCCEL CYL CIC BEL CCCMR JMU RCFF A/C EVP E*H PCV TRANS
1963 VOLV 144S 4 121 2 17C54 3CCC 1C.3 Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER VILE
1975 CCVFCSIT E
HC
A. 72
CC
57.89
CC2
25C.2
NGX
2.36
PPG
19.53
SIHJL4TEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
6.56 71 .34 363.7 3.61 17.92
3.33 47.74 24C.C 3.17 2C.93
C.CLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 35.61 329 .9E 13C2.6 16.67 16.81
COLD STAPILI7EC GRAMS 13.55 2C5.C9 1425.5 1C.44 19.15
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 11.44 152.94 1124.2 13.33 23.21
HCT STAeiLIZEC GRAMS 1C.27 163.29 1379.9 9.CC 2C.54.
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCDE EMISSICNS
SFEEC
HC
CC
C
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2917
MASS 2.51
2.12 12.6e 25C2
41.9? 3 76 .C< 6.73
19.6C
LCVi CRUISF 3C CCNC 2332
MASS 1.46
C.61 14.44 16C8
9.99 297.14 2.98
28.C5
ICLE
0 CCNC
MASS
396C
C. 43
2.57 12.89
8. 15 42 .2C
111
C.C5
C.CC
CCMFCS1TE 25 CCNC
MASS
3045 2.12
1.C8 16.83
96C
2 .07
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING L Ae C R A 1 C P I E S , INC.
1990C E. CGLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
260
-------
TEST NL'HfiER: EC313
CAP MjNBEP s CCfc 5
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER FVISSICN PESLLTS LSINC
1975 FETERAL TEST FPCCECIRES
VFAP P AK E NCOEL CYL CIC eEL CCCNP INRT RCI-F A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1963 VCLV 144S 4 121 2 17C7e 3CCC 1C.2 Y N E P Y A
GRAMS PF« KILE
HC
CC
CC2
NC *
*FG
1975 CCMPOSITE
3.51
42.02
372 .4
3.47
19.81
SI HULA TED 1972
COLE
4.72
47.32
39C.S
4.C7
18.55
SIfULATEC 1972
HCT
2.59
38.C3
356.4
3.C2
2C.e9
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
24.71
202.8t
1398.8
19.44
18.1C
COLD STARILIZEC
GRAPS
1C.71
152.CI
1 532 . E
11. C7
18.99
HOT TRANSIENT
GPAPS
8.74
133.2C
1155.1
11.62
23.35
HCT STAeiLI?EC
GRAfS
10.34
158.83
1473.5
9. 1C
19.53
« * * * 9 *
ANALYSIS CF KEY—MCDE EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CCNC 2SP7 1.98 13.85 2E42
PASS 2.10 41.25 373.16 7.40 20.03
LOVi CRUISE 30 CCNC 2454
KASS 1.18
C.56 14.44 1665
£.51 2S1.EC 2.98
28.83
IDLE
0 CON'C
PASS
3995
0.20
3.4C 13.CC
fc.54 42.C8
125
C.C6
C.CC
COMPOSITE 25 CCNC 3114 1.99
PASS C.eC 15.47
1G5 1
2.23
AUTTf CT IVE TESTING L,ADC R A TCP I E S t UC.
1990C E. CCLF/SX, AlPCRA, CCLC. SC011
261
-------
TEST M."BER: EC3C4
CAB MMeEP: 0C66
EEFCPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLITS ISING
1975 FFCERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR "«KE MCDEL CYL CK RPL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP E >H PCV TPANS
1970 PL YM FLRY 8 440 4 27C56 4CCC 12.0 Y N EM Y A
GR4MS PER MILE
1575 COMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 NO* PPG
4.58 75.42 5C1.C 2.42 14.C5
SIMULATEC 1972 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HOT
5.43 86.6C 514. S 2.36 13.32
3.94 66.82 49C.5 2.45 14.65
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 22.<55 340.Ct 1EZS.5 1C.65 13.34
COLD STABILIZED GRAMS 17.79 31C.96 2C32.5 7.24 13.3C
HOT TRANS IFNT GRAMS 11.75 1SC.2C 1646.1 11.If 16.4C
HPT STAeiLIZEC GRAMS 15.<=9 iS3.27 2C46.6 7.48 13.4C
44444*44*44*44*«44444**44«44444 4 *
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE Ef ISS ICKS
SPEED HC CO CC2 NCX
f FG
UGH CRUISE 49 COKC 2778 2.56 12.32 13S6
MiSS 3.42 7C.91 485.65 5.53
14.64
LOW CRUISE 33 CONC 2367 C.9C 11.77 1A53
MASS 2.5C 26.51 4C2.23 4.74
IS.71
IDLE
0 CCNC 2784 3.42 e.49 64
MASS C.7C 19.43 76.45 C.C6
C.OC
COMPOSITE 27 CONC 2736 2.42
MASS 1.59 33.13
690
2. 10
AUTCMOTIVE TESTING LARCR*TCR I ES, INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX, AI.RCR4 » CCLC. 8CC11
262
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC312
CAR NUMPEPJ 0C66
AFTER
OVNAMCMETER EH ISS IC^ FESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC BBL CCCMP IKRT PCFF i/C EVP EXF PCV TRANS
1970 PLYH FURY 8 440 4 27C71 4CfcC 12.C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
KPG
1975 CCMP0S1TE
4.56
61.49
524. C
4.56
14.02
SIMULATED 1972
COLC
5.26
75.2!
5 3 7.5
4.29
13.24
SIMULATED 1972
HOT
4.C2
51.11
513.9
4.77
14.67
COLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
22.44
344.79
ie74.1
15.7C
13.C7
COLD STABILI2EC
GP APS
17.15
219.62
2157.2
16.49
13.41
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
12.97
163.72
1696.7
19.27
16.29
HOT STAeiLIZFC
GRAMS
12.73
ie3.5£
2174.2
17.23
13.7C
ANALYSIS CF
KFY-MCCE EMISSICN'S
SPEEC
HC
CC
C02
NO*
MPG
HIGH CPUISE 49
CCNC
3098
2.C9
12.(4
1976
MASS
5.48
65.49
475
6.61
14.95
LOW CRUISE 33
CCNC
2645
C.7C
11.(9
244C
MASS
2.77
16.45
4C9.41
6.93
20.C(
IDLE 0
CCNC
2750
2.C9
8.(2
MASS
c.ta
11.41
71.C5
C.C5
C.CC
CCMPCSIT E 27
CCNC
2966
1.83
1C7C
MASS
2.16
25.54
2.71
AUTGMCTIVE TESTING LA0CR
1990C E. CCL F A x , fLRCRA,
MCP IES
CCIC .
, INC.
accu
263
-------
TEST Mi*eEP: EC310
CAP flUeEH: CC67
e IF CPE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCOEl CYL CIC fiBL CCCMP INRT RChP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1971 FCRC LTD 8 351 2 21739 ^50C 12,7 Y Y EM V A
GRAMS PEP MILF
HC
cc
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 COMPOSITE
6.27
144.04
47E.9
12. 2E
SIMULATED 197?
CCLC
7.19
UG. 6?
4E£.f
1.(2
11.64
SIVULATFC IS 72
t-CT
5.36
*31.46
411,6
12.61
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
34.24
631. 8C
1649.3
4,91
11.82
CCLO STAB 1LIZFC
GRAMS
21 .90
573.36
2C1 £ , 5
7.?3
11,46
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
16,30
412.69
1521,4
14,59
HOT STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
20.11
555.2E
H5S.4
6,25
u. ee
«**«*« 4*
~ » «
« # * «
* ~ « ~ «
* * *
~ * ~ ~ *
!» * ~ ~ >»
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
EK1SSICNS
SPEEC
hC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
4412
i.ce
11,11
MASS
4.77
121.56
42 E . 72
2. e i
14,03
LOVt CRUISE 33
CCNC
3 7 5?
2.75
13.19
1163
MASS
3.C4
55.77
366 ,9C
3,36
15. IS
I CLE 0
CCNC
5038
6.79
1C.31
7e
MASS
1*1^
31.44
5 ,2 C
C.C6
c.oc
COMPOSITE 27
CONC
4456
5.54
?PV
MASS
2,27
56.74
1.25
AUTGNCTIVE TESTIS LASCPfTCPIES
199CO E. COLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC.
. INC.
eccu
261+
-------
TEST NUMBER: E0314
CAP NUMeER: CC67
AFTER
OYNAMGMETEP EMISSICN RESULTS USING
IS75 FEOERAU TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CYL CIC Bet CCCMR INRT RCI-P A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 FCRC LTD 8 351 2 21761 450C 12.7 Y Y EM Y A
GRA«S PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
1975 CCMPOSITE
5.71
130.32
543.5
1.49
11.62
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
7.55
148.49
546.2
1.4C
11.06
SIMULATE: 1972
HCT
4.33
116.61
539.9
1.55
12.C9
CCLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
39 .34
616. 9C
1635.6
4.91
11. 1C
COLD STABILIZED
GRAMS
17.29
496.81
2275.7
5.6C
11.C2
HCT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.ia
377.73
1773.6
6.C4
13.46
HOT STAP1LIZEC
GRAMS
15. 7C
455.CE
2291.7
5 .6C
11.22
ANALYSIS HF KEY-MCCE fMISSIC.NS
SPEFO HC CC CC2 KCX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 49 CCNC
MASS
4C99 5.36 II. 2E 547
4.36 1C6.95 444.9 5 2.C6
14.21
LCK CRUISE 33 CCNC 3CS1 1.94 13.56 636
MASS 2.94 39.IS 392. CI 2.27 19.2C
IOLE
0 CCNC 277fl 2.94 13. C5 58
MASS 0.63 11.77 67.26 C.C6
C.CC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 3752 4.2E
MASS 1.64 38.67
376
C. 89
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LAPCRATCRIESt INC,
19900 E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
265
-------
TEST MMeER: EC315
CAP KLP6ER J CC68
eEFCPE
OVNAKOMETEP EMISSION RESULTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MODEL CU CIC BEL CDCMP INRT RChF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
197C CHEV. CAMER 8 307 2 257C7 3*CC 11.2 Y N EM Y S-3
GRAMS PER PILE
1975 COMPOSITE
FC CO CC 2 NO MPG
12. C2 ICS.81 449.7 3.C9 13.4e
SIMULATEC 19 72 CCLC
SIMULATED 1972 HCT
12.15 121.-46 466.6 2.93 12.76
11.93 1C1.C7 135.5 3.21 14.C9
COLD TRANSIFNT GRAMS 37.96 417.20 167C.2 13.63 13.01
CCLD STA8ILIZEC GRAMS 53.13 163.8E IE41.2 6.37 12.51
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS 36.31 294. 11 1122.C 15.69 16.26
HOT STABILIZEC GRAMS 54.16 168.31 1769.7 8.51 12.81
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE.EMSSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 N'CX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45 CONC 3647
MASS 4.C7
1.59 14. C3 29C4
35.6C 425.97 6.87
16.CC
LOW CRUISE 30 CCNC 469C 1.81 12.43 1471
MASS 3.99 31.CI 3 31.19 3.47
22.34
IDLE
0 CONC 2 2 594
MASS 4.85
e.47 6.96 42
40.CC 41.C3 0.C7
C.OC
COMPOSITE 25 CONC 72C6 2.79
MASS 4.57 37.91
967
2.65
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR 1ES . INC.
199CC E. CCLFAX, ALPCKA, CCLC. 8CC11
266
-------
TEST NLMBER: EC318
CAR NUMEER: CC68
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER EHISSICN RESULTS USING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECURES
YEAR MAKE- MCCEL CYL CIC BeL CCCMR INRT RCFF A/C EVP E>h PCV TRANS
197C CHF\i CAMAR 8 307 2 25728 35tC 11.2 Y K EM Y S-3
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MPG
10 75 COFOSITE
11.82
66.CI
429. C
3.9C
14.EC
SIMULATED 1572
COLC
12.18
94.7C
44C.2
3.59
14.19
SIMULATEC 1972
HCT
11.56
79.56
420.6
4.14
15. ?C
COLC TRANSIENT
GRAMS
39. 46
353.48
i;e7.e
15.32
14.33
CCLD STABILIZED
GRAMS
5i.ee
356.ec
1714.1
11.59
14. C6
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14.79
239.8E
144C.4
19.44
16.86
HOT STABILIZEC
GRAMS
54. CC
379.57
1672.7
11.17
14.C4
ANALYSIS CF
key-mcce
.EMSSICNS
SPEEC
HC
CO
CC2
NOX
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 45
CCNC
3647
1.17
14.47
3268
MASS
4.C7
28.97
458.62
1C.9S
17.22
LCW CRUISE 30
CCNC
4794
1.46
14.14
1 £9 9
MASS
3.£6
26.36
34C.68
4.27
22.57
IOLE 0
CONC
24054
8.47
6.92
38
MASS
4.74
34.63
26.57
C.C4
C.CC
CCfPCSITE 25
CCNC
74e3
2.47
1152
MASS
4.48
32. 3C
3.25
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRIESi INC.
1990C E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
267
-------
TEST MM8ER: EC316
CAR MKEER: CC69
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER EMISSICN RESUTS ISING
19 75 FECERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YFA9 MAKE MCDEL CYL CIT 9RL CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP E XH PCV TRANS
1969 VCLK CAMPM 4 97 1 4831C 3CCC IG.3 N N EM Y S-^
GRAMS PFR MILF
HC
CC
CC2
NO
*PG
1975 CCMFOSITF
5.97
84.93
323.4
3.C2
IE.72
SIMULATEC 1972
COLC
8.21
91.7C
32 "5.5
3. C2
17.90
SIMJLATEr 1972
HOT
A.29
79 i 82
32C.4
3.CI
19.39
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
41.51
269.79
iict.e
1C.99
17.87
CCLO STABILI2EC
GRAMS
20. C8
317.99
1349.7
ii.ee
17*92
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
12.C6
28C.64
1C53.C
1C.92
21.22
HOT STAPILI7ED
GRAMS
17.38
29C.1*
14C5.5
12.16
17.89
********
4 4 4
4 4 * *
* * * * *
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 *
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCDE
EMISSICNJ
SPEED
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
MFG
HIGH CRUISE 45
CONC
2315
l.ll
14.14
3446
MASS
1.26
17.23
23C.16
5.72
34.C9
ICVi CRUISE 30
CCNC
¦ 2889
2.43
13.2E
lice
MASS
l.ie
21.tC
163.59
1.51
4C.25
ICLE 0
CONC
4C99
4.29
ic.e2
74
MASS
0.49
10.45
39.69
C.C5
C.OC
CCfPCSITE 25
CCNC
27C0
1 .77
9e2
MASS
C.76
13 i 3 E
1 .59
AUTCCTIVE TESTING LARCRA1CR IES
1990C E. CCLFAX, ALRCPA, CCLC.
, INC .
80C 1 1
268
-------
TEST NLMPEP: EC317
CAR NCMeER : CC69
AFTER
OYNAMOMETER emissicn pesllts using
1975 FFCEPAL TEST FRCCFCLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC Ret CCCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
1969 VCLK CAMPM 4 97 1 48332 3CCC 1C.3 N N EM Y S-4
CRAMS PEP MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NC*
MPG
1975 CCMFCSITE
4.C3
68.21
3C3.3
2.7 2
21. C4
SIMULATEC 1972
COLf!
<>.33
69.15
3C8.9
3.17
2C.65
SIMULATEC 19 72
hCT
3.80
67.6 1
299.1
2.39
21.33
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
15.79
252.81
1C97.4
13.15
21. C5
CCLD STABIL1ZEC
GRAMS
16.(8
265.79
1219.1
1C .60
2C.29
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
11 .85
241 .28
1C24.4
7.31
22.56
HOT STABILIZED
GR«MS
16.87
256.55
12£ £. 1
1C.3C
19.64
ANALYSIS OF
KEY-MCCE
.EMSS
ICNS
SPEEC
K
CC
CC2
NC X
MPG
UGH CRUISE 45
CCNC
2360
1.C7
14.C3
36CC
MASS
1.29
15. 5E
215.2C
5.43
36.53
LOW CRUISE 3C
CCNC
2524
2.CI
11.54
lC4e
MASS
1.44
2C.55
165.63
1.41
43.99
I OLE C
CCNC
2124
2.26
12. C3
49
MASS
0.46
7.92
32.C9
C.C4
c.cc
CCHFCSITE 25
CCNC
2334
1.34
9 £4
MASS
C. 77
11.23
1.5C
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAPCRfTCPIESt INC.
1990C E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
269
-------
TEST MJMeER: EC319
CAR NLfeER: CC7C
EEFCRE
DYNAMOMETER E*»jssiCh PESLITS USING
19 75 FEDERAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR HAKE MCOEL CYL CIO BBL CDCMR INRT RCHP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1971 DCDG CCLT
4
97 2 17247 2250
e.e
N Y EM
Y S-4
CRAWS PEP MILE
HC
cc
CC2
NCX
MPG
1*575 COMPOSITE
3.69
42. 74
291. C
1.62
24.ce
SIMULATFC 1972
CCLC
4 . 49
46.ce
313.1
1.65
22.26
«IMULATFC 1972
HOT
3.C9
4C.22
274.4
1.94
25.64
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
20.26
161.39
1236.6
6.5C
20.89
CCLO STABILIZED
GRAMS
13.42
ie4.2 1
1 IC9.8
5.89
23.78
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
9.78
117.44
947.9
£.69
27.94
HOT STA'RI L I ZEC
GRAMS
13.C7
2C1.79
115E .3
5.92
22.61
44*4444*4
4 4 4
* * * *
4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4
* 4 * 4 4
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
• EMSSICNS
SPEED .
HC
CC
CC 2
NC>
MPG
UGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
1845
2.35
14.66
2479
MASS
1.26
ii.ee
3.29.36
4 .64
25,3C
LCW CRUISE 23
CCNC
2553
2.6 1
14.CC
327
MASS
1.51
26.64
233.11
C. 59
31.44
TOLE 0
CCNC
11330
7.39
1C.5C
ec
MASS
c.te
9.75
2C.36
C.C3
C.CC
COMPOSITE 2C
CCNC
3651
3. i e
seo
MASS
C .91
12.36
1. 17
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LA PCPA TCP IES
199DO E. CCLFAX, Al.RCR/, CCLC. i
, INC.
B0C1 1
270
-------
TEST NU^fiEP: EC328
CAR NLMEER: CC7C
AFTER
DYNAMOMETER FN I SS IC^ PESLLTS LSING
1975 FEDERAL TEST PPCCEDLRES
YEAR KAKE MCDEL CYL CID Bf>L CDC"R INRT RChF A/C EVF E XH FCV TRANS
1971 OCDG CCLT 4 97 2 17259 225C 6.e K Y EM Y S-4
GRAMS PER PILE
HC
CO
CC2
NC>
MPG
1975 CPMPOSITE
3.C3
47.54
2EE.1
1.71
23.91
SIMULATED 197?
CCLC
3.49
58.1C
293.6
1.6C
22. 4S
SIMULATED 1572
HCT
2.69
39.57
283.9
1.76
25.11
COLD TRANSIENT
GRAMS
14. 62
261.71
1C25.C
6.55
21.92
COLD STADILIZEC
GRAMS
11.36
174.07
1177.C
5.48
23.C7
HOT TRANSIENT
GP'AMS
0.63
122.73
952.4
7.68
27.71
HOT STAPILIZEC
GRAMS
9.94
166.IE
1 146.<
5.57
23.79
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SPEED . FC CC CC2 NC>
MPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 1967
MASS 1.56
3.23 15.3C 2179
14.C2 327. C9 5.4 3
25.15
LCVi CPUISE 23 CCNC 25C6
MASS 1.42
2.52 14.2? 364
2 5.94 227.13 C.51
32. 69
IDLF
0 CCNC
MASS
51 77
C. 35
5.69 11.92
7.7C 26.74
53
C.C4
C.OC
COMPOSITE 2C CCNC 26C8 3.44
MASS C.77 11.2S
593
1.35
*UTCMCTIVE TFSTING IAECRA TCP I ES , INC.
199CC E. CCLFAX, 4iRC»i, CCLC. flCOll
271
-------
TEST NUMBER: EC320
CAR KveERJ CC71
8 F FCRE
CYNAMOMETER emissicn results lsing
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECIRES
YEAR make MCDEL CU CIC PEL CDCMR INRT RChF A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1968 CHEV I P PAL 8 ?07 2 63396 4CCC 12.C V N EM V A
GRAMS PEP PILE
HC
CO
CC 2
KCX
PPG
1975 COMPOSITE
15. 56
194.24
434.8
1.30
11.26
SIMULATED 1972
CCLC
21. C2
269.44
42 6.4
C.73
9.7C
SIMULATED 1S72
HCT
11.45
137.51
439.6
1.72
12.87
COLO TRANSIENT
CRAWS
100.C8
1396 .80
14EC.2
2,4 2
6.14
COLO STAEILIZEC
GRAMS
57.54
124 . C2
1732.5
3.C7
11.84
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAPS
28.34
4C7.29
1564.6
9.63
14.17
HCT STAEILIZEC
GPA^S
30. C2
439.85
196 7 .9
11.74
12.45
* 4 *
* ~ * »
4 « * * *
~ * »
* * * ~ *
~ * * n #
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
. EMSS
I.CNS
SPEEC
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 49
CCNC
4934
5.26
12.19
13C9
MASS
6.15
1C4.5C
472.68
5.26
13.57
LCW CRUISE 33
CCNC
5490
4.57
12.51
1C1C
MASS
5.C9
84.15
372.51
2.96
17.1C
IDLE C
CCNC
76 6C
5.5C
11.54
151
MASS
1.23
19.37
56.22
C.C8
c.cc
CCMFOSITE ?7
CCNC
5492
4 .9 7
se9
MASS
2.9C
47. it
1.75
AUTCMCT IVF TESTING LABCPATCPIES
19900 E. CCLFAX, ALPCRA, CCLC.
, INC.
8CC 1 1
272
-------
TEST NLMfiEPs EC327
CAP NLMEEP: C071
*FTER
DYNAMOMETER EMISSION PFSLLTS LSIKG
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLRES
YEAR HAKE MCPEL CYL CIR eRL CCCMP INRT RCI-F A/C EVP EXH PCV TPANS
1S68 CHEV IMP4L 8 307 2 b34l7 4CtC 12. C Y N EM Y A
GRAMS PFR MILE HC CC CC2 NCX MPG
1975 CCMPOSITF
12.4C
197.CO
45S.6
1.54
11. C2
S I MULATFD 19 7?
COLC
16.68
252.64
457.6
1.09
S.81
SIMULATED 1S72
HCT
9.18
155.C2
4(1.1
i.ee
12.14
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAMS
8C.S3
12C6.CS
153S.S
3.C4
8.61
COLD STAGILIZEC
GRAMS
44. 15
666.71
18S1.S
5.14
11.CI
-HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
24.69
473.94
1566.3
6.S3
13.61
HOT STAeiLIZEC
GRAMS
26. 18
4C5.86
2C1S.5
1C.68
12.51
ANALYSIS OF KEY-KCOE EMSS1CNS
SPEED . hC CC CC2 NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 47S4 5.41 12.IS 1212
MASS 6.C3 1C6.2E 461.S2 4.EC
13.74
LCW CRUISE 33 CCNC
f ASS
IDLE
4.57 12.51
5.CI 83.88 371. = 4
942
2.S3
0 CCNC fiC81 3.02 13.31 438
PASS 1.22 13.11 7S.16 C.24
17.14
C.OC
COMPOSITE 27 CCNC 5043 4.tl
MASS 2.65 44.2E
678
1.74
AUTOMOTIVE TFSTINC LABfRiTCPIES , INC.
1«39CC E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 9CC11
273
-------
TEST M^RER: EC321
CAR MJf* P E R : CC72
e e f r p e
DYKSTKEIE" f^l SSICf^ PFSLITS LSINC-
1975 F EUERAL TEST FHrCEClRES
Y E #R MAKE KCDEL CYL CIC Ret CCC*R IKRT RCHP A/C EVP E)h PCV TRANS
1 <969 CHEV CHEVE 8 396 4 AC<.23 15CC 1L.2 Y N A I Y A
GRAPS PEP "ILE
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
197S CCMPCSITE
3C. 14
t I . 7 2
<51.7
3.tS
12.44
SIMULATED 1972 CCLC
34.52
S 7 • 14
5 15.2
3. 7C
11 .45
S1 fULATED 1972 HCT
26.64
69.71
473.S
3.68
13.32
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS
14 7.40
2 56.12
1SC6.3
17.51
ic.e5
CCLO STAeiLWFC CRAKS
11 1.40
314.15
1S5E.I
IC.25
12. C7
bCT TPA^VlEM CR AC S
65.<2
186.<5
15S5 .5
1 7.3<
14.95
HOI StARI L I ZEC GRAB'S
ICS.27
33S.C2
iete.1
e.se
12.46
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCCE ECISSICKS
SPEED
HC
CC
CC 2
f FG
HCM^CttUME COKC 132C«
MASS. 23.54
C.64 1C .65 275C
21.7f 5C7.27 12.*5
14.45
.^«;pCfkilt€ )C CCkC 139C3 1. C7 S.65 1057
HASS 19.<91 35.e! 4C1.CC <>.21 It.SI
I Bit
0 CCKC 17588
kass *.e2
4.St f.7e 48
24. 7S 53.6* C.C5
c.cc
*CPW?SITE 25
CC*C 14C79
MASS 11.20
1.44
25.66
638
3.61
iUTrfCTIVF TESTING lAPCRMCF IES, IK.
1990C E. COL FAX, AlRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
27U
-------
TEST MMPfft: EC326
CAP KLfeEH: CC72
AFTER
CYNAvr-'FTCR f^ISSICN FfHLTS tSINC
IS 75 FE0EP41 TEST FPCCEC13ES
YEAR MAKE ¦KCOEl CYL CIC Hei CCC"F I NR T Pm «/C £VP E*h PCV TRAKS
1969 CHEV ChFVE 8 396 4 4C445 35CC 11.2 Y N AI Y A
C-PAMS PEP HLF
hC
CC
CC 2
NC*
PPG
1975 COMPOSITE
4.?e
69.94
562.5
2.57
12.96
SIMULATED 1972 COLC
5.75
e9.71
5 E 3 .3
.2.47
11.9S
SI "ULATEC 1S72 HCT
3.17
55.C2
54t.E
2.<4
13.e4
CCIC TPAKStENT GRA»«S
29.48
4CC.S5
2CE1. 1
11.77
11.59
CCLO STARILI2EC CAMS
13.64
2 71.91
22^3.6
6.79
12.4C
HOT TRANSIENT GRAMS
10. IB
14C.77
1EC7.3
12.99
15.77
HfT STAeiLIZEC GRAMS
13.4C
26C.24
21(4.1
e.3e
13.11
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMSSICNS
SFFEC »-C CC CC2 NC>
PPG
UGH CRUISE *5 CCNC 155C C.ee 12.76 ie45
MASS 1.25 27.72 535.1C 7.St
15.29
tCW CBU1SE 30 CCNC 1112 1.3S 11.74 5e3
CASS 1.34 35.68 422.4.5 1.99
IE.45
IDLE
0 CONC 3132 3.1C 1C.24 40
MASS 0.53 15.6S e3.66 C.C7
C.CC
COMPOSITE
2? CCNC
MASS
1793
C.80
1.2E
2C.91
523
2. 20
AUTCOTI VF TFSIING IAeCPA TCP IES» INC.
199QC E. COLFAX, AIRCPA, CCIC. 3C011
275
-------
fFS1 EC324
CAR NUffifRs CC73
eFFCPE
cynamc«etep f»mssicn =esuis lsisg
1975 FECERAL TFSJ FPCCECLRES
YEAR fAKF fCDFL CVL CIC "HI COCMP I MM RCI-P A/C f:VO EXK PCV TRANS
1 c68 CHEV P. E L AI 8 307 2 72571 4CCC 12.C N N EM Y A
GR4"S PEP KILE
1975 CCMPOSITE
HC CO CC2 MIX PPG
7.«;? 47.e<; 479.1 5.26 i4.5t
SICULATFC 19 7? CCLC e.7?
SIMULATED 19 72 HCT 7.32
15.ec <94.5 5.17 13.89
61.93 44 7.4 5.34 15.14
CCLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 34.66 340.C5 1 774 .4 19.62 13.44
CCLD STAOIU/EC GRA!"S 3C. 51 228 .4? 1934.2 19.14 14.35
HCT TRANSIENT GRAPS 24.37 236 .C4 1572.7 2C.ee 14. C9
HOT STAPIU12PC CRAH 27.9ft 2C8.22 1954.4 2 1 - 2 C 14.47
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCCE EMSSICKS
SPEED hC CC CC2 NC>
PPG
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 4586
MASS
1.55 14.44
!C 12
5 .44 41 .91 5C4.44 11 . f. 1
14.95
LCw CRUISE 33 CCNC 4377 l.Ct 14.2C 2449
KASS 4.27 2e.l8 392.75 7.55
19.77
IPLE
0 CCNC 1C774 5.02 13.85 69
fASS C.6e 1C.73 34.41 C.Ct
C.CC
CCP PCS IT E 27 CCNC 569C 2.C5
MASS 2.2e 21.74
1325
3.62
AUTCfOTIVE TESTING LAPCPA ICR I fS, INC.
1900C E. CPLFAX, ALRCRA, CCLC. eCCU
276
-------
TP5T MMFER: EC330
CAP MJfEFR: CC73
Af TEP
CYKA^CVETFP f I SS TCN FESUTS USING
1975 FE0EP4L It SI FBCCECLRES
YEA1* MAKE fCCFL CVL CIC P"L CCC.fF l*P7 F!>F t/C EVP EXh PCV TRANS
I960 ChEV P EL 41 8 307 2 72595 4CCC 12.C N N EM Y A
GRAMS PER HUE
HC
CC
CC 2
NC X
MPG
19 7 5 COMPOSITE
fc.27
59.62
5C4.2
4.26
14.42
SIMULATED 1972
COLC
6. e4
6f>.f»9
524 . £
4.32
13.6C
SIMUIATFC 1972
HCT
5.A4
"52.65
48E.7
4 • 2 6
15.1C
CCLC TRANSIENT
GRAMS
29. 1C
344.C5
1f7S .4
16.78
12.94
CCLO STAeiLIZFC
GRAMS
22. 16
172.62
2C it. <
15.61
14 . 3 C
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
21.59
222.25
16C9.1
16.33
16.C4
t-OT STAeiLIZEC
GRAMS
21. C3
12C.55
2CCC.2
16.26
15.2C
ANALYSIS CF KEY-fCOE EMJSICNS
SPEEC HC CC CC2 NCX
UGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 4fl29 2.2C 14.18 2AI
MASS 5.59 52.97 493.37 f.6
LCfc CRUISE 33 CCNC 465-5
IDLE
C CONC
MASS
4725
1.3?
2.12 1*.CC
C.17 13.11
4.68 <57.27
IIS
MASS 4.42 j?6 • 59 3eC.2C 5.<5
27
C. 7
CCMPCSITE 27 CCNT 4792 1.71
MASS 2.75 IS.21
1 179
3.4C
AUTCTTIVE TFSTING LA8CPATTRIES~ INC.
I990C E. COLFAX, AIRCRA, CCLC. 8CC11
MFC-
14.9?
2C.43
C.CC
277
-------
1EST MJPeERS EC325
CAR NLPPER s CC74
EEFCPE
. DYNAMOPET EP EMISSIPN RESLLTS ISING
1975 FEDERAL TEST FRCCECLRES
YEAP *AKE VTOEL CYL CIC BPL CCC^R INR T RChP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 VCLK SEDAN 4 97 1 33994 2CCC 6.3 N N EM Y S-4
GPAPS PER NILE
1975 COMPOSITE
HC CC CC2 NO PPG
4.42 7 3.32 299.1 2.81 2C.79
SIPULATEC 1972 CCLC 4.79
SIPULATEC 1972 HCT 4.15
78.57 3C3.5 2.SI 2C.14
69.35 295 .6 2.75 21.31
COLD TRANSIENT GRAMS 17.63 298.06 1C5E.C 12.39 20.55
COLD STABILIZED GPAVS 18.27 291.22 1216.C 9.42 19.76
HOT TRANSIENT GRAYS 12.£5 228.93 1CCC.S 11.17 23.2C
HOT STABILIZED GRAMS 16.72 28C.lt 1132.1 e.16 21.CI
ANALYSIS CF KEY-PCDE EPISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
PPG
HIGH CRUISE 37 CCNC 2C89
1.7 C 14.71 3678
PASS 1.59 28.93 346.19 £.73
22.45
LCW CRUISE 23 CCNC
PASS
2353
2.4( 14.14
1.35 23.46 21C.26
14 72
2.29
35.42
IDLE
0 CCNC 7819 7.C7 1C.74 21
MASS C.48 9.6C 23.32 C.C4
C.OC
CDPPGSITE 20 CONC 316C 2.67
MASS 0.85 15.96
11C3
2.4C
AUTCPCTIVE TESTING LACCRATCP I ES. INC,
19<5CC E. CCLFAX, ^IRCRA, CCLC. 8C011
278
-------
TEST M.MRER: EC329
C«P MMEER: 0074
AFTER
CYNAMOM ET EP EMISSION RESLLTS LSING
1975 FEPEPAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR MAKE MCDEL CYL CIC PPL CCCMP IN tt T RCFP A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
1969 VCLK SEDAN 4 97 1 34C15 2CCC £.3 N N EM Y S-4
GRAMS PER MILE
HC
CC
CC2
NCX
KPG
197? COMPOSITE
A.29
66.71
297.7
2.C2
21. 4C
SIMULATFC 1972
CCLC
A.57
71.22
3C3.6
2.20
2C.7C
SI^ULATEC 197?
HOT
4.C8
63.4C
293.1
1.67
21.95
CPLC TRANSIENT
GRAMS
16.71
274.CI
1C94.2
1C.17
2C.62
COLD STA8ILI2EC GRAMS
17.57
26C.16
1164.4
fc .36
2C.79
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.Ct
215.32
1C14.C
7.7C
23.32
HOT STAPILI2FC GRAMS
17.64
255.24
1153.6
5.54
21.2C
> 4 4 » 4 ~
ANALYSIS CF
KEY-MCCE
Emis;
ICNS
SFEEC
HC
CO
CC2
NCX
MPG
UGH CRUISE 37
CCNC
1950
1.61
14.59
2711
MASS
1.44
2B.32
326 .21
6. 12
23.tC
LOW CRUISE 23
CCNC
1741
2.C7
14 .29
1163
MASS
1.33
2C.52
217.59
1.53
35.05
IDLE 0
CCNC
3612
3.23
13.26
77
MASS
C. 37
4.51
33.57
C.C4
C.CC
CCMPnSITE 20
CCNC
223C
2 .CC
6 6 7
MASS
0.74
12.25
2.13
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LfPCP#TCP IES
199CC E. COLFAx, AiRCRA, CCLC.
, INC.
eccn
279
-------
TEST M>PER: EC338
CAP KffiEP: CC 75
eEFCRE
DYNAvnvETER EMISSION RFSllTS LSING
1 <375 FECEPAL TEST PRCCECLRES
YEAR M AK E PCCEL CYL C IC BRl CCCVP INRT P.Ch F A/C EVP EXH PCV TRANS
197? BLIC LESAH 8 350 4 10125 45(k 12.7 Y Y EM Y A
GRAMS PER MILE
1975 CrMFOSlTE
HC CC CC2 NCX ?PG
4.60 1C3.57 5S4.7 2.46 11.54
SIMULATED 1S7? CCLC
SI MIL A TFC IS 72 HCT
5.C3 1C6.31 <12.S 2.47 11.IS
, ALRCRfl. CCLC. g C C 11
280
-------
TEST MMBER: EC342
CAF NUf-PEP: CC75
AFTER
CYN'AWCMETER FMISSICK PESLLTS LSHG
1975 FEDERAL TEST FPCCECLPES
YEAR MAKE MCOEL CYL CIC PeL CCCMR INRT RCHF «/C EVP EXK PCV TRANS
1072 BUIC L ESAB fl 350 4 1C144 45CC 12.7 > 1 EM > A
GPAMS PER MILE HC CC CC2 NC> MPG
1S75 CCMPnSITE
4.35
83.09
625.9
2.71
11.56
SIMULATEC 1972
CQLC
4 .18
9C.96
646.6
2.80
11.C7
SIMULATED 1972
HCT
4.11
77.16
61C.2
2.64
11.96
CCLO TRANSIENT
GRAB'S
17.55
311 .93
2259.4
13.5C
11.59
CCLD STABILIZED
GR H*. S
17.56
37C.27
259C.4
7.49
1C.62
HOT TRANSIENT
GRAMS
13.24
2C8.42
1966.1
12.28
13.ec
HGT STABlLIZEC
GRANS
15.65
294.81
2644.4
7.29
1C. 66
ANALYSIS CF KEY-MCCE EMISSICNS
SPEED HC CC CC2 NCX
PFG
MGH CRUISE 49 CCNC 29C3 1.32 14.74 2C15
*ASS 3.35 41.62 547.47 7.51
14.26
LCW CRUISE 32 CCNC 3T£fc
PASS 3.4fi
2.49 13.lt 9C2
52.30 299.63 2.63
1E.C7
mLE
0 CCNC
MASS
2778
C.71
1.49 14.14
6.25 ice.ee
164
C.14
c.cc
COMPOSITE 27 CONC 2974 1.41
MASS 1.67 21.=2
6 9 7
2.24
AIITCCTIVE TESTING L A >?C P I TCP I E S , INC.
199CC E. COLFAX, 4LRCR4, CCLC. eCCU
281
-------
APPENDIX E
PREDICTED 1955 THROUGH 1972 MODEL
PASSENGER CARS IN COLORADO
Predicted passenger car registration data Is presented
on the following pages. Predictions are based on methods
described elsewhere In the study. It should be noted
,that data tends to be less reliable for each subsequent
year.
It is possible to predict data for model years 1973, 197U
and 1975 using registration data presented In this sec-
tion. However, predicted data for new model years would
probably be unreliable. It can be seen from the data
presented, that there is a great deal of scatter In
registration data by make and model year, and a good
fit would be difficult to establish.
283
-------
PASSENGER CARS IN OPERATION AS OF JULY 1, 1972 (PREDICTED)
Model Year
Make
' 72
'71
1 70
'69
'68
•67
•66
'65
'64
'63
'62
'61
'60
' 59
'58
'57
'56
vn
w
1
AMMOT
2099
U239
21U5
3092
231(3
2528
3036
3374
3633
3900
1149
1822
2002
1042
372
132
10
2
BUICK
1934
3402
4201)
U 39U
5529
4694
4646
4555
4227
3644
3132
2011
1168
623
15
23
73
8
CADI L
907
11+98
1760
1567
2063
1908
1715
16.29
1559
1486
1444
1049
1080
671
35 3
300
22
2
CHEVR
10709
19137
16475
18535
21594
17305
20407
20576
20438
15552
4523
8538
8205
4855
3114
2149
2412
2322
CHRYS
942
1840
1459
2121
2983
2596
3017
2120
1545
1332
898
596
341
205
106
2
11
0
DODGE
3295
5575
4832
5855
5940
4211
5406
5027
4091
2732
673
1221
1085
484
5
4
9
0
FORD
14147
24480
21935
18569
15612
18742
21476
21447
14681
13532
4664
7721
5144
3428
350
1070
1016
737
IMPER
91
128
179
229
239
293
184
212
265
158
125
87
75
50
23
0
0
0
LINCO
U81
720
581
765
1(99
564
565
425
386
295
313
260
126
30
13
16
17
1
MERCU
2540
it 330
3323
4018
1(117
5184
3568
3383
2792
2308
2516
1960
1152
89
151
122
160
114
OLDSM
2311
4194
4429
b882
5012
5486
5468
4918
4668
3494
3376
1755
1178
803
19
106
150
155
PLYMO
4 789
8098
6279
6969
7281
6039
6676
6649
4325
3470
665
1659
1285
610
1
3
18
0
PONTI
2450
4 389
4945
6801
9057
8070
7269
6963
6178
4700
3538
1397
1957
971
91
144
138
154
IMPOR
13678
32909
16994
18334
17592
13419
10423
8175
7229
6353
4752
4674
4497
3887
2371
1086
507
201
-------
PASSENGER CARS IN OPERATION IN COLORADO AS OF JULY 1, 1975 (PREDICTED)
_ Model Year
MaKe,.
¦72
'71
' 70
'69
*68
•67
'66
'65
•61*
'63
'62
'61
'60
'59
'58
'57
'56
'55
AMMOT
1*239
<*389
2218
3193
2<*17
2606
2920
311*6
31*33
31*1*8
160
1215
1332
551*
209
61*
2
0
BUICK
5U02
3530
1*356
1*51*8
5716
U6 76
1*599
1*1*1*9
1*025
3316
2267
1771*
872
350
0
1
8
• 0
CADI L
1U98
1569
18b0
1635
2150
1981*
1702
1607
1523
11*81*
136U
9 U8
993
1*99
213
181
1
0
CHEVR
19137
19651
16907
19009
211*76
17080
19863
19567
19561
10603
537
61*71
6119
3072
1852
615
1181
1212
CHRYS
18U0
1878
11*89
2163
30HO
2591
2998
2086
1U89
1233
328
U86
21*5
12<*
56
0
0
0
DODGE
5575
5767
1*992
60U3
5936
1*198
5357
1*908
3867
2182
139
918
713
310
0
0
0
0
FORD
21*1*80
25200
22561
19085
151*57
18331
20569
19870
1291*3
11633
1001
6156
3U61
2001
63
1*11*
502
362
IMPER
128
132
18U
236
2<*6
301
180
202
2i*<*
137
99
55
1*1*
30
8
0
0
0
LINCO
720
7 5 U
608
798
520
556
5U9
1*01*
357
263
261*
25U
101*
10
3
3
I*
0
MERCU
U530
1*1*03
3378
1*083
1*181*
5037
3389
3108
2<*50
190U
1891*
161*1*
802
12
77
50
79
56
OLDSM
l»19U
1*35 3
1*591
SOS1*
6113
5Uit7
536b
"*710
1*266
2059
2582
1072
522
1*02
0
25
U5
1*5
PLYMO
8098
8312
61*1*1
71UU
7269
6008
6581
61*28
1*026
3017
89
12U6
791*
330
0
0
1
0
PONTI
I* 389
¦*536
5106
7015
9 3 3U
7959
707i»
6630
5692
1*1*09
291* 5
702
11*01*
562
16
33
39
51
IMPOR
32909
31*791
17913
19271*
181*50
11*01*3
10313
8037
701*7
6121*
¦*1*92
1*363
¦*107
31*59
201*6
90<*
1*05
117
-------
PASSENGER CARS IN OPERATION IN COLORADO AS OF JULY 1. 197U (PREDICTED)
. . . Mode) Year
• 7fl 1 KQ 'KB 1 K7 1 K F. "KS >RL Ict I c 9 IK1 lcn Icq
UflKe
' 72
'71
' 70
'69
*68
'67
'66
'65
6 U
'63
*62
'61
'60
'59
'58
'57
'56
'55
AMMOT
U389
U 5 38
2291
3295
2U92
2506
2722
2799
3157
2885
2
697
783
2 U0
104
26
0
0
BUICK
3530
3658
4509
4702
5695
l»629
4493
U 2 36
3663
2798
1139
1505
602
168
0
0
0
0
CADI L
1569
16U1
1920
1703
2236
1969
1678
1569
1U67
1U83
1256
828
895
31*3
110
98
0
0
CHEVR
19651
20166
17338
18904
21197
16625
18889
179U2
18U2U
5328
7
4512
U229
1728
981
92
1*71
5<*3
CHRYS
1878
1916
1518
2205
303<«
2575
2950
2010
1378
1062
22
375
156
6U
25
0
0
0
DODGE
5767
5958
5153
6038
5918
4160
5230
U638
3U27
1066
6
635
<•21
179
0
0
0
0
FORD
25200
25920
23188
1889 5
15118
17557
19057
17518
1063U
9001
U5
t»638
2100
1023
6
126
218
159
IMPER
132
136
190
243
253
295
172
186
212
109
70
26
20
15
2
0
0
0
LINCO
75U
788
634
831
512
540
523
37U
317
221
208
2U8
81*
2
0
0
1
0
MERCU
it U0 5
1*1* 76
3
-------
PASSENGER CARS IN OPERATION IN COLORADO AS OF JULY 1, 1975 (PREDICTED)
3 Model Year ,
Make
'72
'71
'70
'69
'68
'67
•66
•65
'64
•63
'62
'61
'60
¦59
*58
•57
'56
'55
AMMOT
4538
4687
2364
3397
2397
2337
2422
2327
2800
2249
0
332
397
82
46
9
0
0
BUICK
3658
3787
4662
4684
5637
4522
4278
3855
3090
2092
288
1218
377
67
0
0
0
0
CADI L
1641
1712
2000
1771
2218
1941
1639
1512
1386
1482
1117
695
789
213
47
46
0
0
CHEVR
20166
20681
17243
18659
20633
15810
17321
15586
17019
1649
0
2848
2677
848
455
6
147
204
CHRYS
1916
195*
1548
2201
3015
2534
2843
1861
1186
807
0
271
87
27
9
0
0
0
DODGE
5958
611.9
5149
6021
5865
4062
4943
4111
2699
136
0
399
219
92
0
0
0
0
FORD
25920
26639
22957
18480
14479
16265
16801
14392
79 30
5945
0
3277
1130
448
0
29
81
61
IMPER
136
140
195
249
247
281
158
162
168
77
41
8
7
7
0
0
0
0
LINCO
788
822
660
819
497
514
484
333
268
174
150
243
67
0
0
0
0
0
MERCU
44 76
4549
3488
4031
3860
4395
2732
2250
1540
999
490
1017
288
0
13
5
14
10
OLDSM
U513
4672
4915
5190
5957
5118
4695
3621
2632
7
711
152
19
48
0
0
1
1
PLYMO
8525
8739
6592
7096
7129
572 7
5924
5203
2710
1499
0
549
190
63
0
0
0
0
PONTI
4683
4830
5427
7130
8958
7375
6205
5368
4115
3707
1665
41
507
116
0
0
1
2
IMPOR
36673
38551)
19751
21156
19104
13661
9883
7551
6453
5431
3932
3546
3154
2484
1360
549
222
22
-------
YR
PAKE
MC06L
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CAR6
REGISTERED
PROJECTED—MID ""
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1571
72
73
74
75
72
AKKC7
GREML
2750
232
A
1
C
229
463
*eo
496
72
AMMOT
GREKL
275C
232
S3
1
C
253
522
541
559
72
ACKCT
HCPNE
3GC0
232
A
1
c
289
585
6C6
626
72
AMMOT
HOPNh
3CCC
232
S3
i
0
125
254
263
272
72
AKMCT
HCRNE
3500
36C
A
2
c
25
51
53
55
72
AMMOT
HOPNE
3iCC
3tC
S3
2
c
11
22
23
23
72
AMMCT
MAT AC
3500
232
A
1
c
117
237
246
'254
72
AMMOT
MAI AD
35CC
232
S3
1
c
6
13
14
14
72
AMMCT
MAT AC
4GJC
3G4
A
1
c
25C
5CJ
523
541
72
AC.MOT
MATAD
40CG
304
S3
I
G
14
29
30
31
72
AMMCT
ANBAS
3500
258
A
1
C
5
1C
IC
11
72
AMMCT
AMBAS
4C0C
304
A
2
0
368
744
771
797
72
AMMCT
JAVEL
30C0
232
A
1
G
26
52
54
56
72
AMMCT
JAVEL
3C00
232
S3
1
0
3
6
6
6
72
AMMOT
JAVEL
3C0C
232
S4
1
c
1
3
3
3
72
AMMCT
JAVEL
35GC
36C
A
2
c
150
304
314
325
72
AMMOT
JAVEL
350G
36C
S3 -
2
0
17
36
37
38
72
AMMCT
JAVEL
35CC
360
S4
2
0
9
18
19
19
72
BUICK
SKVLA
33CC
35C
A
2
0
550
965
10C5
1042
72
BUICK
SKYLA
3500
350
S4
2
0
5
9
1C
1C
72
BUICK
LESAH
45C0
35C
A
2
c
479
843
875
9C6
72
BUICK
CENTU
45GC
455
A
4
c
200
352
366
379
72
EUICK
ELECT
5CCC
455
A
4
e
3 56
696
723
.749
72
BUICK
RI VIE
45CG
455
A
4
c
116
2C4
212
22C
72
BUICK
STAViA
C
0
C
0
0
106
1E7
194
2CI
72
CACIL
CALAI
50CC
472
A
4
c
65
ICG
113
118
72
CADIL
DEVIL
5C0C
472
A
4
0
647
1C65
1120
1171
72
CADIL
FLEET
50GC
472
A
4
c
69
113
119
124
72
CAOIL
ELCCR
5CCC
50C
A
4
G
124
206
216
225
72
CHEVR
VEGA
2500
14C
A
1
C
651
1236
1269
13C2
72
CHE VP
VEGA
25C0
140
S3
1
0
382
682
701
719
72
CHEVR
VEGA
25CG
140
S4
1
G
531
949
575
1CGG
72
CHEVR
NOVA
35CC
25C
A
1
0
507
9C6
930
955
72
CHEVR
NCVA
35G0
25G
S3
1
c
1G1
1EC
185
19C
72
CHE VR
f\CVA
35CG
250
S4
1
c
12
22
22
23
72
CHEVR
NCVA
35CC
307
A
2
c
534
954
9ec
1CC6
72
CHEVR
HCVA
350C
307
S3
2
c
1C6
19C
1S5
2C0
72
CKEVR
NOVA
350C
307
S4
2
c
12
23
24
24
72
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
250
A
1
0
120
214
220
226
72
CHtVR
CHEVE
35CC
25C
S3
I
c
3
7
7
7
72
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
25C
S4
1
c
4
7
7
7
72
CHEVR
CHEVf
35CC
307
A
2
0
1701
304 C
3122
3204
72
CHEVR
CHEVE
3S0C
307
S3
2
c
56
IOC
1C?
1G6
72
CHEVR
CHEVE
35GC
307
54
2
c
58
103
ict
ICS
72
CHEVR
CHEVR
4CCC
25C
A
1
c
59
106
109
112
AUTCMCTIVE_ test IlvG JL|#|CR#T_CB IE_Sf _ INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, ALRCRA» CCLC.
288
-------
YR
KAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTEREC
PROJECTEC-MID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
72
CHEVR
CHEVP
4CCG
25C
S3
1
0
0
G
0
0
72
CHEVR
CHEVR
4G00
35C
A
2
C
1992
3561
3656
3752
72
CHEVR CHEVP,
4CC0
400
£3
2
0
15
27
28
29
72
CHEVR
CAHER
35CC
2 5C
A
1
0
53
94
97
99
72
CHEVR
CAfEX
35G0
250
S3
1
0
7
13
13
14
72
CHEVR
CAPER
3 5 CO
25C
S4
1
0
6
11
11
11
72
CHEVR
CAPER
3500
307
A
2
0
488
873
896
92C
72
CHEVR
CAPER
3ECC
307
S3
2
c
49
124
127
130
72
CHEVR
CAPER
350C
307
S4
c
57
1C2
1C5
1C7
72
CHEVR
CORVE
35C0
350
A
4
0
59
106
108
111
72
CHEVR
CCRVE
350C
35C
S4
4
G
69
124
127
130
72
CHEVR
STAhA
G
0
C
0
1G51
1879
1929
I960
72
ChRYS
KE^PC
45C0
36G
A
2
G
54C
1055
1C77
1C98
72
CHRYS
NEhPC
4500
36C
S3
2
C
7
13
14
14
72
CKRYS
3GC
4500
400
A
4
C
125
244
249
255
72
CHRYS
NEWYO
4 SCO
400
A
4
0
180
352
359
366
72
CHRYS
ST Ah A
0
0
C -
0
68
173
176
180
72
COCGc
DART
300C
19 8
A
1
C
625
1C58
1094
1131
72
DCDGE
CART
3C0C
198
S3
1
C
54
91
94
98
72
DODGE
DART
30CG
198
S4
1
0
6
11
12
12
72
DODGE
DART
35CC
318
A
2
C
285
462
498
515
72
CCDGE
DART
35CC
312
S3
4
C
24
41
43
44
72
CCDC-E
DART
35C0
318
S4
4
c
3
5
c
5
72
DCDGE
CHALL
35C0
198
A
1
c
5
9
1C
10
72
CCDGE
CHALL
35CC
198
S3
1
c
0
c
0
0
72
CCDGC
CHALL
35CC
198
S4
1
c
c
C
c
0
72
CODGE
CHALL
35C0
225
A
1
c
. 7
12
13
13
72
DCDGE
CHALL
35C0
225
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
72
CCDGE
CHALL
35CC
225
S4
1
c
c
G
0
0
72
DCDGE
CHALL
35C0
318
A
2
c
179
303
313
324
72
CODGE
CHALL
35CC-
318
S3
2
c
11
20
2C
21
72
CCDGE
CHALL
35C0
318
S4
2
c
1C
18
ie
19
72
CODGE
COFCN
35CC
225
A
1
c
42
72
74
77
72
DCDGE
CCPCN
35CC
225
S3
1
G
1
2
2
2
72
DCDGE
CCPCN
35CC
225
S4
1
c
0
0
c
C
72
CODGE
CCPCN
35C0
318
A
2
c
727
1230
1272
1315
72
DODGE
CCRCN
35C0
318
S3
2
G
25
42
43
45
72
DCDGE
CCPCN
3500
318
S4
2
c
9
15
15
16
72
DODGE
CGFLN
35CC
44G
A
4
c
37
64
66
68
72
CODGE
CCRCN
3SC0
44 C
S3
4
c
1
2
2
2
72
DODGE
CCPCN
35CC
44 C
S4
4
c
c
C
c
0
72
CODGE
CHARG
3 5CC
225
A
1
c
6
11
12
12
72
DCDGE
CHAPG
3SCC
225
S3
1
c
0
c
C
0
72
CCDGE
CHARG
35CC
225
S4
c
c
c
C
0
72
DCDGE
CF.APG
3500
318
A
?
c
i le
*99
2Cf
213
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR IES» IhC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLC.
289
-------
YR MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REC-ISTEREC
PROJECTED-MID
01SP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1571
72
73
74
75
72 00DGE
CHARG
35CC
318
S3
2
0
4
6
7
7
72 CCDGE
CH/RG
35C0
3X8
S4
2
C
1
2
2
2
72 COOGE
CHAKG
35C0
44 0
A
4
C
13
22
22
23
72 DCDGE
CHARG
3500
440
S3
4
C
C
C
0
0
72 CCDGE
CHARG
35CC
44C
S4
4
C
0
0
0
0
72 COOGE
PCL/R
4000
225
A
1
C
1
2
2
2
72 DGCGE
PCLAR
4CGC
225
S3
1
C
0
0
0
0
72 CCDGE
POLAR
4000
318
A
2
0
425
720
745
769
72 DCDGE
PCLAR
40CG
318
S3
2
c
1
2
2
2
72 CODGt
MONAC
4500
360
A
2
c
148
250
259
267
72 CCDGE
HCNAC •
45CC
44C
A
4
0
148
25C
259
267
72 CODGE
STAfcA
0
0
0
0
c
370
626
647
669
72 FORD
PINTC
2250
98
A
I
0
957
1656
1705
1754
72 FORD
PINTO
2250
98
S4
1
0
11C1
1906
1962
2018
72 FCRC
MAVER
300C
17G
A
1
c
8 1G
14C3
1444
1485
72 FORD
MAVER
3CC0
170
S3
1
c
227
393
405
416
72 FCRD
HAVER
3000
302
A "
2
c
1C2
176
182
187
72 FORC
MAVER
3000
3C2
S3
2
c
28
49
51
52
72 FCRD
TCRIN
35C0
250
A
1
0
222
384
395
4C7
72 FORD
TCP IN
35C0
25C
S3
1
0
9
15
16
16
72 FCRC
TCP IN
*3500
25C
S4
1
c
2
4
4
4
72 FCRD
TOR IN
350C
302
A
2
0
ie73
3241
3337
3432
72 FORD
TCRIN
35C0
3C2
S3
2
c
76
133
136
140
72 FCRD
TCPIN
35G0
302
S4
2
0
21
37
38
39
72 FCRC
TOR IN
35 CC
351
A
4
c
4C2
695
716
736
72 FORD
TCRIN
35CC
351
S3
4
0
16
28
29
30
72 FCRC
TOPIN
35C0
351
S4
4
¦ 0
4
8
e
8
72 FCPD
FCPD
4000
240
A
1
0
32
56
58
59
72 FCRC
FOPC
40CC
24 C
S3
1
0
0
0
c
0
72 FCRD
FCRC
4OC0
302
A
2
0
3247
562C
5785
555G
72 FCRO
FORO
4C0C
4CC
A
2
c
3280
5677
5844
6C10
72 FCRD
MUSTA
3000
250
A
1
c
106
183
188
194
72 FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
25 C
S3
1
c
12
22
22
23
72 FCRD
MUST A
30C0
25C
S4
1
c
6
1C
11
11
72 FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
302
A
2
0
976
1689
1739
1788
72 FCRD
MUSTA
3CC0
302
S3
2
0
117
202
206
214
72 FORD
MUSTA
3CCC
3C2
S4
2
c
57
S9
102
105
72 FCRO
TBIRD
45CC
429
A
4
0
290
503
5ie
532
72 FORD
STAWA
C
C
C
0
0
232
402
414
426
72 IMPER
LERA*
5CCG
440
A
4
c
90
128
132
136
72 LINCO
CONTI
50C0
460
A
4
c
270
405
424
443
72 LINCC
KARK4
5GC0
46C
A
4
c
210
314
329
344
72 MERCU
M0N1C
35CC
25C
A
1
c
44
75
76
78
72 MERCU
HONTE
35CC
302
A
2
c
476
812
826
840
72 MEf-.CU
MONTR •
4S0C
351
A
2
0
105
179
182
166
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCR1ES, IKC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AUPCPA» CCLC.
290
-------
YR
f.AKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARB
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PRCJECTE0-K1D
72 73 74 75
72
HERCU
MARCU
45CC
429
A
4
C
131
224
228 232
72
72
KERCU
KERCU
CCLGA
CCKET
35C0
3CC0
351
17C
A
A
2
1
0
0
573
366
978
625
994 1C11
635 646
72
72
MERCU
HERCU
CCKET
COMET
3CCO
3CCC
170
3C2
S3
A
1
2
C
C
1C2
225
175
384
178 181
391 397
72
t-ERCU
CCKET
3CC0
302
S3
2
0
43
1C7
109 111
72
72
HERCU
CLDSM
STAV.A
F-85
C
35C0
C
35C
C
A
0
2
0
0
448
1131
764
2052
777 790
213C 22C8
72
72
GLDSM
CLOSM
f-f5
F-b5
35CC
35C0
35C
350
53
54
2
2
0
C
9
206
16
375
17 17
369 404
72
OLDSH
DELTA
4ECC
35C
A
2
0
465
844
876 908
72
72
CLOSK
OLDSM
DELTA
98
4500
45C0
455
4 55
A
A
4 .
4
0
0
372
376
676
682
702 728
7C8 734
72
72
CLDSK
CLDSH
TCRCN
STAVA
500C
C
455
C
A
C
4
0
c
c
130
175
237
31S
246 255
330 342
72
PLYKC
VALIA
3UC0
1S8
A
1
c
969
1672
1717 1761
72
72
PLYKC
PLYK.C
VALIA
VALIA
30C0
3CC0
196
198
53 *
54
1
1
c
c
194
13
328
22
336 345
22 23
72
72
PLYKC
PLYK.O
VALIA
VALIA
3 5 CC
35CC
340
34C
A
S3
2
2
0
c
345
67
584
114
600 615
117 120
72
PLYING
VALIA
35CC
340
S4
2
0
4
7
7 8
72
72
PLYMO
PLYKC
SATEL
SATEL
35C0
35C0
225
225
A
S3
1
1
0
c
52
2
89
4
91 94
4 4
72
72
PLYMO
PLYK.C
SATEL
SATEL
35C0
35C0
225
318
S4
A
1
2
0
0
10
616
17
1042
17 18
1C7C 1C98
72
PLYMO
SATEL
35C0
4C0
S3
2
C
11
19
19 20
72
72
PLYKC
PLYKC
SATEL
FURY
3500
4CC0
4CC
225
S4
A
2
1
c
c
7
77
13
13C
13 13
133 137
72
72
PLYKC
PLYK.C
FURY
FURY
4000
4CG0
318
383
S3
A
1
2
c
0
17
1464
30
2476
3C 31
2541 2607
72
PLYKC
FURY
4000
383
S3
2
0
339
573
5Ee 6C3
72
72
PLYK.C
PLYKC
BARRA
BARRA
35CC
35CC
198
198
A
S3
1
1
0
0
18
2
31
3
32 33
3 3
72
72
PLYKC
PLYKC
BARRA
3APBA
35CC
3 SCO
318
34C
S4
A
1
2
0
c
2
51
4
87
5 5
SC 92
72
PLYKC
BARRA
35CO
34 C
S3
2
0
5
9
9 9
72
72
PLYMC
PLYHO
QARR /
3ARR A
35C0
4CCC
34C
383
S4
A
2
4
0
0
7
33
13
55
13 14
57 58
72
72
PLYKC
PLYKC
BARRA
BARRA
4000
4C00
34C
340
53
54
4
4
0
c
3
5
5
e
6 6
e 8
72
PLYMO
STAWA
0
0
0
0
0
423
715
734 753
72
72
PCMI
PCKTI
LEKAN
L E K # K
3 SCC
3500
25C
25C
A
S3
1
1
C
0
26
C
47
C
48 50
C 0
72
72
PCMI
POM I
LEKAM
LEK.9N
4000
4CCC
4CG
4CC
A
S3
2
2
c
c
520
7
932
13
963 994
13 14
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING
LABCRATCR1ESf INC.
199C0 E. COLFAX AVENLE, AUFCRA, CCLG.
291
-------
YR MAKE HQCEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTEREC PRCJECTED-HID
D1SP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
462 828 855 883
15 27 28 29
280 502 519 536
117 209 216 223
249 *47 462 477
72
PONTI
FIRE8
350C
2 5C
A
1
c
11
2C
2C 21
72
PCNTI
FIREE
3 SCC
25C
S3
1
0
0
1
1 1
72
PCNTI
FIREE
35CC
35C
S4
1
0
0
1
1 1
72
PCNTI
FIREE
3SCC
40C
A
2
c
189
338
35C 361
72
PCNTI
FIRES
35CC
400
S3
2
0
13
. 23
24 25
72
PCNTI
FIREE
35CC
4CC
S4
2
c
12
23
23 24
72
PCNTI
ST Ah A
0
0
C
0
0
252
452
467 483
72
IKPCR
VCLK5
225C
C
C
0
c
6323
15213
16C83 16953
72
IMPCR
TCYCT
2500
0
0
0
0
2C54
4942
5225 5508
72
IHPGR
DATSU
225C
0
cv
c
0
1117
2688
2842 2996
72
IMPCR
OPEL
2250
0
c
0
0
924
2224
2251 2479
72
IMPOR
VOLVO
3CC0
0
c -
c
0
496
1194
1262 1331
72
IKPCR
CTKER
2250
0
0
0
c
2761
6644
7C24 74C4
72
PCNTI
CATAL
4500
350
A
2
0
72
PCNTI
CATAL
45C0
400
A
4
0
72
PCNTI
ECIVNE
4500
455
A
4
0
72
PCNTI
GRANV
4500
455
A
4
0
72
PCNTI
GKANP
4CCC
4CC
A
4
0
-------
YR MAKE MODEL KfclGUT ENG. TRANS C
DISP TYPE T
RB REGISTERED
PE JULY 1971
PKCJECTED-MID
72 73 74 75
71
AMMCT
GREML
275C
232
A 1
229
463
4GC
496
512
71
AMMCT
GREML
275C
232
S3 1
258
522
541
559
578
71
AMMCT
HCPSE
3CCC
232
t 1
2£S
585
606
626
64 7
71
AHMOT
HCRivE
30CC
232
S3 1
125
254
263
272
280
71
APMCT
HCRNE
3500
360
A 2
25
51
53
55
56
71
AHMOT
HCPNc
35C0
360
S3 2
11
22
23
23
24
71
AMMCT
MAT All
3500
232
A 1
117
237
246
254
262
71
AMMCT
M AT AD
3 5CC
232
S3 1
6
13
14
14
15
71
AMJ'CT
MAT AD
4CCC
3C4
A 1
25C
5C5
523
541
559
71
AMMOT
MATAD
4CCC
3C4
S3 1
14
2S
3C
31
32
71 AMMCT AMe AS 350C 258
71 "AMMCT AM8AS 4CCO 3C4"
71 AMMCT JAVEL 3CC0 232
71 AMMCT JAVEL 3000 232
71 AMCT JAVEL 30C0 232
A 1
5
1C
10
11
11
A 2
368
744
771
797
t»23
A 1
26
52
54
56
58
S3 1
3
6
6
6
6
S4 1
1
3
3
3
3
A 2
15C
3C4
314
325
336
S3 - 2
17
36
37
38
39
54 2
9
18
19
19
20
A 1
12
22
23
24
25
S4 1
C
C
C
C
0
71 AMNCT JAVEL 35CC 36C
71 AM. MOT J A V EL" 350C 360"
71 AMMCT JAVEL 3500 360
71 BUICK SKYLA 3500 250
71 BU1CK SKYLA 3SC0 25C
71
euiCK
SKYLA
3500
350
A
2
550
969
10C5
1042
1C78
71
buick
SKYLA
35C0
350
S4
2
5
9
10
10
10
71
BU1CK
LESAB
4500
350
A
2
479
843
875
906
.938
71
BUICK
CENTU
45CC
455
A
4
2C0
352
366
379
392
71
BUICK
ELECT
5000
455
A
4
396
696
723
749
775
71
SU1CK
RIVIE
45C0
455
A
4
116
204
212
22C
227
71
BUICK
STAkA
0
0
C
1C6
187
194
2C1
2C8
71
CAOIL
CALAI
5000
472
A
4
7
11
12
12
13
71
CA01L
UEVIL
5000
472
A
4
692
1143
1198
1252
13C7
71
CADIL
FLEET
5CG0
472
A
4
73
121
. 127
133
139
71
CADIL
ELDCR
50C0
5C0
A 4
133
220
231
241
252
71
CHEVR
VEGA
25CC
140
A 1
691
1236
1269
13G2
1336
71
CHEVR
VEGA
250C
140
S3 1
362
682
7C1
719
737
71
CHEVR
VEGA
25C0
140
S4 1
531
949
975
lOCO
1C26
71
CHEVR
NCV A
350C
25C
A 1
EC7
906
93C
955
979
71
CHEVR
NOVA
35C0
250
S3 1
101
180
185
19C
195
71
CHEVR
NOVA
350C
25C
54 1
12
22
22
23
23
71
CHEVR
NOVA
350C
3C7
A 2
534
954
980
10C6
1C31
71
CHEVR
NOVA
350C
3C7
S3 2
1C6
19C
195
2CC
205
71
CHEVR
NOVA
35C0
3C7
S4 2
13
23
24
24
25
71 CHEVR CHEVE _35C0 2SC _ A
71 CHEVR CHEVE 35C0 250 S3
71 CHEVR CHEVE 35CC 25C _ S4
71 CHEVR CHEVE 350C 307 A
71 CHEVR CHEV£ 35C0 307 S3
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING L
1S9C0 E. CCLFAX AVEN
__12C_
3
4_
17C1
56
_214
7
7
22C
226 232
7 7
7 7
3C4C 3122 32C4 3266
100 103 1C6 ice
ECRATCfilES, INC.
E, AURCRA, CGLC.
293
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
(•EIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTEREC
PRCJECTED-MIO
D1SP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
71
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
307
S4
2
se
1C3
106
1C9
112
71
CHEVR
CHEVR
4000
250
A
1
59
1C6
109
112
115
71
CHEVR
CHEVR
4000
250
S3
1
C
C
C
C
C
71
CHEVR
CHEVR
4000
350
A
2
1992
3561
3656
3752
3648
71
CHEVR
CHcVR
4000
4C0
S3
2
15
27
28
29
30
71
CHEVR
CAMER
3500
25C
A
1
53
54
97
99
102
71
CHEVR
CAPER
35C0
25C
S3
1
7
13
13
14
14
71
CHEVR
CAKER
35CC
250
S4
1
6
11
11
11
12
71
CHEVR
CAMER
35CC
307
A
2
486
873
896
920
943
71
CHEVR
CAKER
35CC
3C7
S3
2
69
124
127
13C
134
71
CHEVR
CAMER
35CC
3C7
S4
2
57
1C2
105
1C7
110
71
CHEVR
CCRVE
3500
35C
A
4
59
1C6
ICE
111
114
71
CHEVR
CCRVE
35CC
35C
S4
4
69
124
127
13C
134
71
CHtVR
STAfcA
0
C
C
0
1051
1879
1929
198C
2030
71
CHRYS
KEkPC
4500
383
A
2
54C
10 55
1C77
ICS 8
112C
71
CHRYS
NEfcPO
45CC
3e3
S3
2
7
13
14
14
14
71
CHRYS
30C
4500
440
A -
4
125
244
249
255
260
71
CHRYS
NEKYG
45CC
400
A
4
1EC
352
359
366
374
71
CHRYS
ST Ah A
0
C
C
0
88
173
176
1EC
183
71
DCDGE
DART
3CC0
198
A
1
t25
1C58
1C94
1131
1167
71
CCDGE
DART
3000
196
S3
1
54
91
94
96
101
71
DCDGE
DART
3CCC
198
S4
1
6
11
12
12
12
71
CODGE
DART
3500
34C
A
2
265
482
498
515
531
71
CCOGE
CART
3 5 CC
340
S3
4
24
41
43
. 44
46
71
CCDGE
DART
35CC
340
S4
4
3
5
5
5
5
71
CCOGE
CHALL
3500
198
A
1
5
o
10
1C
1C
71
DCDGE
CHALL
35CC
198
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
71
CCOGE
CHALL
3500
198
S4
1
0
0
c
0
0
71
CODGE
CHALL
350C
225
A
1
7
12
13
13
14
71
CCDC-E
CHILL
3 500
225
S3
1
0
0
c
0
0 ¦
71
DODGE
CHALL
3 5CC
225
S4
1
C
C
0
0
0
71
CCDGE
CHALL
3500
383
A
2
179
3C3
313
324
334
71
CCDGE
CHALL
3500
383
S3
2
11
20
2C
21
22
71
DODGE
CHALL
350G
383
S4
2
10
16
18
19
19
71
CCDGE
CCRCN
3500
2-25
A
1
42
72
74
77
79
71
CODGE
CORCN
35C0
225
S3
1
1
2
2
2
2
71
CODGE
CCRCN
35C0
225
S4
1
0
C
C
C
1
71
CODGE
CORCN
35CC
316
A
2
727
1230
1272
1315
1357
71
CCOGE
CCRCN
3500
318
S3
2
25
42
43
45
46
71
CCDGE
CCRCN
35CG
318
S4
2
9
15
15
16
17
71
DCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
440
A
4
37
64
66
66
70
71
DCDGE
CCRCN
3500
44 C
S3
4
1
2
2
2
2
71
CCDGE
COPCN
3500
440
S4
4
C
0
0
C
0
71
CODGE
CHARG
350C
225
A
1
6
11
12
12
12
71
CCDGE
CHARG
35CC "
225
S3
1
G
0
C
0
0
AUTCHGTIVE TESTING LABCPATCR IES_,_INC_.
19900 E. CCLrAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLC.
29U
-------
(0
firL —
MC §CO > Mo* ~*yO Jlo\*H~^-*
rU-J- M. - / & yr
//C - /S~ %
/i/o. - —
icL /Co-^t ^ ^ /^.Q Q /
I' ojju^ sy^^ctoU.— JL*4lA yitr^ /~~ /
J. ^xJax^uU^j ^ Co^t: JL0JuZCs<~
a^cUjL Mo& Qjt iOf ZO}1 Oj 40j ^ £~Q ffis^JujL Aj^cct^-
4" /o ^ (].£>¦ ^Cr^^^tLer^- ^j£tJvZ4 £jj£ -?,OQ<3 -6C CTL JL^m.
j_
,£&JLtLsc£cer^ frf
-PA^JT
%^gSLsLspY~i. ^LuL* ^>v- /V^M^cjhs
~s6&-e- ^3sts6- -
M<97>£ —
/!*~-tX~a-~e qk. CcTH-C- .
J? db~ (3^C ~~
fr "~
-------
ur
|, &jbdU£-^
-------
-X- flLx. -tuXr
6LrU.
?j2L~ uJL^-'-t 1/Aaw i
^z
^-£>Cs£l.<- —
^CO 6CNX-<3 oMlsaJL ye^OJL^
$a^tt*
C <^/Vc_
— yl^s^ ^p^Z£*-J- X^cZjt^j
_J2^~—
-------
(/J<^A_ XUxMuaJLxXl^C
jL^JjU^ h~^*-Lst$ OO'i^lA- j\J^&
^ /l&^t-^&ir-i*- JLr-y !(L
us-&~d
pfl% "T^-^UJ-
Art /Jo - £¦. /A, S3, no, 3? ?L . 4-0. +1-. S3 7S
_, / / /- —j -/ y~ —/ 7~ —
-------
C-OLoe.^i5o Sua vf y
En i si i o fo i_i=uSi_s /Jpre/e. CoA/eecrwe A//» iajtsm a ajcf
For. ini. vehicles
Test Mo-
HC
E.xcess
co
Excess
¦ 5"
4t6/"*
+ /.2-/
*-
44.5-
•h Jo, S"
/2-
3-2.3
*
S4.1.
V- t£.^-
y 3
ZK
Cc>.)
+ a/./
2o
*
3.0&
/ 2.1.4*
V ffM.
H
M 3
53.4 *
V /*?
2£
IM
-*¦
£¦1.)
V /3'/
4-0
3-/4-
2S-.9
*4-
?.£03 -j- •. b 3 £,7.3/ -j- &¦ % • ^
MC M EA AJ IS 19 % OV£ft STA*JJ>A/lt>
Co Ml£/)<0 /s 7.3- % OVE£- STA*JD*I*LE>
SIs-hicle^
*¦ A 0V££_ /973. 5T/)aJ7>A><2ps
^ % 7=C>fZ. M(L
90 % ro/2. C<3
-------
YR
MAKE
MCCEL
VEIGUT
ENG.
TR AKS
CARS
REGISTERED
PROJECTEC-MID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
71
DCOGE
CHAPG
3500
225
S4
1
0
0
0
0
0
71
DCOC-E
CHARG
35C0
318
A
2
118
199
206
213
220
71
DCOGE
CHARG
3 SCO
318
S3
2
4
6
7
7
7
71
OOOGE
CHARG
35C0
318
S4
2
1
2
2
2
2
71
CCDCE
CHANG
3500
44 C
A
¦ 4
13
22
22
23
24
71
COCGE
CHAPG
35CC
440
S3
4
C
0
0
0
0
71
CCOGE
CHARG
350C
44 C
S4
4
0
0
0
0
0
71
CCDC-E
PCL*R
40C0
225
A
1
1
2
2
2
2
71
DCDGE
PCLAR
4000
225
S3
1
C
0
0
0
0
71
OOOGE
POLAR
4CC0
383
A
2
425
720
745
769
794
71
CCOGE
PCLAP
4000
383
S3
2
1
2
2
2
2
71
DODGE
MONAC
45CG
383
A
2
148
250
259
267
276
71
OCOGE
MCNAC
4500
383
A
4
146
250
259
267
276
71
OOOGE
STAWA
0
0
0
C
370
626
647
669
690
71
FCRD
PIKTC
22S0
98
A
1
957
1656
1705
1754
1 £03
71
FORO
PINTC
225C
98
S4
1
1101
19C6
1962
2018
2074
71
FCRD
MAVER
30C0
17C
A -
1
eic
14Q3
1444
1485
1526
71
FCRC
HAVER
3CCC
17C
S3
1
227
393
405
416
428
71
FCRD
MAVER
30CO
302
A
2
1C2
176
182
1E7
192
71
FCRD
HAVER
30CC
302
S3
2
28
49
51
52
54
71
FCRD
TCP IK
3500
250
«
1
222
3e4
395
4C-7
418
71
FORD
TORIN
3500
250
S3
1
9
15
16
16
17
71
FCRD
TCRIK'
3500
250
S4
1
2
4
4
4
4
71
FORD
TCRIN
35CC
351
A
2
ie73
3241
3337
3432
3527
71
FCRD
TOPIN
3500
351
S3
2
76
133
136
140
144
71
FORD
TORIN
3ECC
351
S4
2
21
37
38
39
40
71
FORD
TORIN
3500
351
A
4
402
CS5
716
736
757
71
FCRD
TORIN
35C0
351
S3
4
16
28
29
30
31
71
FCRD
TOPIN
3500
351
S4
4
4
8
E
8
8
71
FCPD
FOPD
4000
240
A
1
32
56
58
59
61
71
FCRD
FCRD
4000
240
S3
1
C
0
C
C
0
71
FORD
FORD
4CC0
351
A
2
3247
5620
57e5
595C
6116
71
FCRD
FORD
40C0
400
A
2
32EC-
5677
5644
601C
6177
71
FCRD
MUSTA
3CC0
250
A
1
106
183
1E8
194
199
71
FCRD
MUSTA
30 CO
2"50
S3
1
12
22
22
23
23
71
FCPC
MUSTA
30C0
25C
S4
1
6
10
11
11
11
71
FCRD
MUSTA
3000
302
A
2
976
1689
1739
1788
1838
71
FCRD
MUSTA
300C
302
S3
2
117
2C2
2oe
214
220
71
FORD
MUSTA
3000
3C2
S4
2
57
S9
102
105
108
71
FCPC
TBIRD
4500
429
A
4
29C
503
518
532
547
71
FORD
STAKA
0
0
0
0
232
402
414
426
438
71
IMPER
LEEAR
50C0
440
A
4
90
128
132
136
140
71
LINCO
CCNTI
500C
460
A
4
270
405
424
443
463
71
LIfv'CC
MARIO
5GC0
460
t
4
21C
314
329
344
35S
71
MERC I)
MONTE
3500
25C
A
1
44
75
76
78
79
AUTCFCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR IE£« INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE* AURORA, CCLC.
295
-------
YR MAKE MODEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTERED PRCJECTEC-K1D
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
71
KERCU
MCNTE
35CC
351
A
2
476
812
826
840
854
1
KERCU
KERCU
MGNTR
K.ARCU
4500
4500
40C
429
A
A
2
4
1C5
131
179
224
182
228
186
232
189
236
71
71
KERCU
KERCU
COL'GA
COMET
35CC
3CCC
351
17C
A
A
2
1
573
366
978
625
994
635
1011
646
1027
656
71
KEPCU
CCKET
3CG0
170
S3
1
1C2
175
178
181
184
71
71
MERCU
KERCU
COMET
CCKET
3CG0
3GC0
302
302
A
S3
2
2
225
63
384
1C7
391
1C9
397
111
4C4
113
71
71
MERCU
CLGSH
STAWA
F-85
0
3500
0
250
G
A
0
1
44e
13
764
24
777
25
79G
26
8C3
27
71
CLCSM
F-85
35CC
25C
S3
1
0
0
0
0
0
71
71
GLUSM
GLDSH
F-85
F-65
35C0
35CC
250
35G
S4
A
1
2
C
1131
G
2C52
G
2130
C
2208
0
2286
71
71
OLDSM
CLOSM
F-65
F-85
35C0
3500
350
35C
53
54
2
2
9
9
16
16
17
17
17
17
18
18
71
CLDSM
DELTA
45GC
350
A
2
465
844
876
9CS
940
71
71
CLCSK
GLDSM
DELTA
98
45 CO
4500
455
4£5
A "
A
4
4
372
376
676
682
702
708
728
734
754
760
71
71
CLDSM
CLDSM
TCRGN
STAVA
5000
C
455
0
A
0
4
0
130
175
237
318
246
330
255
342
264
354
71
PLYKG
VALIA.
3GOO
198
A
1
969
1672
1717
1761
18C5
71
71
PLYK.O
PLYKC
VALIA
VALIA
30CG
3COO
198
198
53
54
1
1
154
13
328
22
336
22
345
23
354
• 24
71
71
PLYKC
PLYK.O
VALIA
VALIA
350C
350C
318
318
A
S3
2
2
345
67
584
114
600
117
615
120
631
123
71
PLYKC
VALIA
35 CO
318
S4
2
4
7
7
8
8
71
71
PLYMO
PLYK.C
SATFL
SATEL
35C0
35CG
225
225
A
S3
1
1
52
2
89
4
91
4
94
4
96
4
71
71
PLYMO
PLYK.C
SATEL
SATEL
3500
35CC
225
383
S4
A
1
2
1C
616
17
1C42
17
1C7C
18
1C98
18
1125
71
PLYMO
SATEL
35CC
383
S3
2
26
44
46
47
48
71
71
PLYK.C
PLYMC
SATEL
FURY
35C0
4CCC
383
225
S4
A
2
1
17
77
3C
130
31
133
31
137
32
140
71
71
PLYKC
PLYMC
FURY
FURY
40GC
4CCC
225
3«3
S3
A
1
2
17
1464
3C
2476
30
2541
31
26G7
32
2672
71
PLYKC
FURY
400G
383
S3
2
33S
573
568
603
618
71
71
PLYKC
PLYKC
BARK A
B APR A
3500
3500
198
198
A
S3
1
1
18
2
31
3
32
3
33
3
34
3
71
71
PLYMO
PLYKC
t)ARR A
BAP.RA
35C0
35CG
198
340
S4
A
1
2
2
51
4
e7
5
9C
5
92
5
94
71
PLYKC
BARRA
35C0
34C
S3
2
5
9
9
9
10
71
71
PLYKG
PLYK.C
BAPRA
BAPRA
35CC
4CGG
34 C
36 3
S4
A
2
4
7
33
13
55
13
57
14
58
14
60
71
71
PLYKC
PLYKC
BARRA
BAFRA
40G0
40C0
363
383
53
54
4
4
3
5
5
8
6
8
6
8
6
9
AUTOKCTIVE TjSTING LABORATORIES. INC.
19900 E. COLFAX AVENUE, AURORA, COLO.
296
-------
VR HAKE "MODEL WEIGHT ¥nG~. TRANS CAR8 REGISTERED PRCJECTEO-KID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
71
PLYHC
STAWA
0
0
0
c
423
715
734
753
771
71
PCNTI
LEMN
3500
25C
A
1
26
47
48
50
52
71
PCNTI
LEKAN
35CG
25C
S3
1
C
C
0
0
0
71
PCNTI
LEP Ah
400C
400
A
2
659
1181
1221
126G 1300
71
PGNTI
LEMAN
4CCC
4C0
S3
2
9
16
17
17
18
71
PCNTI
CATAL
45CC
350
A
2
462
626
855
683
911
71
PCNTI
CATAL
45C0
4C0
A
4
154
276
285
294
3G3
71
PONTI
ECNNE
45CC
455
A
4
28G
502
519
536
552
71
PONT I
GRAN V
45CC
455
A
4
117
2C9
216
223
230
71
PCNTI
GRAKP
4C0C
400
A
4
249
447
462
477
492
71
PONTI
FIRE6
3 5 OC
25C
A
1
11
2C
2C
21
22
71
FCNTI
FIREE
35C0
250
S3
1
C
1
1
1
1
71
PCNTI
FIREe
35C0
25C
S4
1
C
1
1
1
1
71
PCNTI
FIRE6
35GC
400
A
2
IB*
338
35C
361
37 3
71
PCNTI
FIREB
35CC
4C0
S3
2
13
23
24
25
25
71
PCNTI
FIRE8
350C
40C
S4
2
12
23
23
24
25
71
PCNTI
STAkA
0
C
o -
0
252
452
467
483
498
71
IHPCR
VCLKS
225C
0
0
0
£323
15213
16C82
16953
17823
71
IHPCR
TGYCT
2SCC
C
0
0
2054
4942
5225
5508
5790
71
IHPCR
DATSU
22SC
C
c
c
1117
2688
2842
2996
3149
71
IKPCR
OPEL
22 SC
C
c
0
924
2224
2351
2479
2606
71
IKPCR
VOLVO
3C0C
0
0
c
496
1194
1262
1331
1399
71
IKPCR
CThEfl
2250
0
0
0
2761
6644
7C24
14C4
7784
297
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARB
REGISTERED
PROJECTEO—M10
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
70
AMKCT
HOPNE
3COO
199
A
1
234
213
221
22E
235
70
AMMCT
HCRNE
30CC
199
S3
I
113
1C3
107
111
114
70
AMMCT
KCRNE
3C0C
232
A
1
214
195
202
209
215
7C
AKMCT
HGP^ E
3000
232
S3
1
72
66
68
70
72
70
AMMCT
HCRNE
30CC
3C4
A
2
£7
79
82
85
87
70
AMKCT
HCRNE
3CCC
304
S3
2
29
26
27
28
29
7C
AMMGT
RE EEL
35CC
232
A
1
213
195
20 2
2C8
215
7C
AMMCT
REBEL
35CC
232
S3
1
40
37
38
35
40
70
"Ammct
REBEL
3 SCO
232
S4
1
7
6
6
6
7
70
AHMUT
REBEL
35CC
304
A
1
222
203
210
217
224
70
AMMGT
REBEL
35CC
3C4
S3
2
42
38
39
41
42
7C
AMMCT
REBEL
350C
304
S4
2
7
6
6
7
7
70
AMMCT
AMEAS
35 CO
232
A
1
46
42
43
45
46
70
AMMCT
AMBAS
3500
232
S3
1
2
2
2
2
2
70
AMKT
AMBAS
4CGC
304
A
2
571
521
539
557
575
70
AMMCT
AMBAS
4CC0
304
S3
2
26
26
27
26
28
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
3CCC
232
A -
1
39
36
37
38
40
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
3CC0
232
S3
1
1C
9
9
10
¦ 10
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
3CC0
232
S4
1
4 -
4
4
4
4
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
35CC
3C4
A
2
ise
iei
187
193
199
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
3500
3C4
S3
2
£2
47
49
50
52
70
AMMCT
JAVEL
3 5CC-
304
S4
2
22
20
21
22
23
70
AMMCT
AMX
35C0
36C
A
4
16
15
15
16
. 16
70
AMMCT
AMX
35CC
360
S3
4
24
22
23
24
24
70
BUICK
SKVLA
3500
25C
A
44
41
43
44
46
70
EllICK
SKYLA
35CC
25C
S3
1
C
0
0
0
0
70
BllICK
SKYLA
3500
250
S4
1
0
0
0
0
c
70
euick
SKYLA
3500
350
A
14B7
1396
1447
1457
1548
70
BUICK
SKYLA
3500
350
S3
18
17
17
ie
IS
70
BUICK
SKYLA
3500
350
S4
2
16
15
16
16
17
7C
EUICK
LESAB
45C0
350
A
2
£68
815
844
874
9C3
70
BUICK
LESAB
45C0
455
A
4
2e9
271
281
291
301
70
BUICK
WILDC
45CC
455
A
4
426
4C0
414
429
443
70
BUICK
ELECT
45C0
455
A
4
e42
750
819
847
Bib
, 70
BUICK
RIVIE
•45C0
455
A
4
257
242
250
259
2b6
70
BUICK
STAV.A
0
C
0
226
212
220
227
235
70
CADIL
CALAI
50C0
472
A
4
12C
122
136
144
15C
70
CAC1L
DEVIL
50CC
472
A
4
1262
13C1
136C
142C
1479
70
CAOIL
FLEET
5C0C
472
t
4
127
139
145
152
15E
7C
CADIL
ELDCR
sccc
500
A
4
183
185
194
202
211
70
CHEVR
NCVA
3000
153
A
1
14
13
13
14
14
70
CHEVR
NOVA
3CCC
153
S3
1
3
3
3
3
3
70
ChEVR
NCVA
30C0
153
S4
1
1
0
0
0
0
70
CHEVR
NGVA
35CO
23C
A
1
1155
1059
1087
1115
11C6
70
CHEVR
NOVA
35CC
23C
S3
1
3C1
276
283
291
289
AUTOMOTIVE _TESTING LAJ3CRATCR IES» INC.
199CG E. CCLFAX AVEKtE» ACRCPA» CCLCV
298
-------
1
YR PAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-FID
DISP
TYPE
TVPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
70 CHEVR
NOVA
35C0
230
S4
1
81
74
76
78
78
7C CHEVR
NGVA
35GC
35C
A
2
926
849
872
894
869
70 CHEVR
NOVA
3500
350
S3
2
241
221
227
233
232
70 CHEVR
NOVA
3SC0
350
54
2
65
59
61
63
62
70 CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
23C
A
1
193
177
181
186
185
7C CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
23C
S3
1
1C
9
9
9
9
70 CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
23C
54
1
22
20
21
21
21
70 CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
35C
A
2
2781
2550
2617
2684
2669
7C CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
35G
S3
2
146
134
137
141
14C
70 CHEVR
ChEVE
3500
350
S4
2
321
294
302
31C
3C8
. 70 CHEVR
eiSCA
4CCC
250
A
1
15
14
14
15
15
70 CHEVR
BISCA
4CC0
250
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
70 CHEVR
tISCA
4GCG
35C
A
2
620
56£
583
598
595
7C CHEVR
BISCA
4000
350
S3
2
13
12
12
12
12
7C CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
25C
A
1
3C
27
28
29
28
7C CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
250
S3
1
C
0
0
C
C
70 CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
35C
A -
2
1176
1C78
1106
1134
1128
7C CHEVR
BELAI
40CC
350
S3
2
25
23
23
24
24
70 CHEVR
IMPAL
40C0
250
A
1
145
133
136
140
139
70 CHEVR
IKPAL
4000
25C
S3
1
3
2
2
¦a
2
70 CHEVR
IHPAL
4CCC
350
A
2
5669
5198
5335
5471
5441
70 CHEVR
IKFAL
40CC
350
S3
2
121
111
114
117
116
70 CHEVR
CAPRI
4C00
350
A
4
977
£96
919
943
-938
.70 CHEVR
CAhER
35CC
230
A
1
81
74
76
78
78
70 CHEVR
CAMER
35CC
23C
S3
1
13
12
12
12
12
7C CHEVR
CAKER
35CC
23C
S4
1
16
15
15
16
16
70 CHEVR
CAPER
35CC
35C
A
2
726
665
683
700
696
70 CHEVR
CAPER
3500
35C
S3
2
118
108
111
114
113
70 CHEVR
CAC.ER
3 SCO
35C
S4
2
149
136
14C
143
142
70 CHEVR
CORVE
3500
350
A
4
45
41
42
43
43
70 CHEVR
CORVE
35CC
3 5C
S4
4
ice
99
1C2
104
104
70 CHEVR
STAViA
C
0
0
0
164C
1EC4
1543
15£3
1574
70 CHRYS
NEKPC
4500
383
A
2
960
848
865
862
899
70 CHRYS
3CC
45CC
44C
A
4
219
194
198
2C2
206
70 CHRYS
NEKYO
4500
44C
A
4
31-6
279
285
290
296
7C CHRYS
STAkA
0
C
0
0
155
137
140
142
145
70 DCCGE
CAPT
3CCC
198
A
1
243
235
243
251
251
70 CODGE
DART
3CCC
198
S3
1
45
43
45
46
46
7C DCCGE
DART
3000
198
S4
1
7
7
7
7
7
70 DCCGE
DART
35C0
340
A
2
ICS
1C2
105
1C8
1C8
70 DCDGE
DART
3500
340
S3
2
19
19
19
2C
20
70 DCDGE
DART
35CC
340
S4
2
3
3
3
3
3
70 CCDGE
CHALL
35C0
225
A
1
93
9C
93
96
96
70 DCDGE
CHALL
3500
225
S3
1
21
21
21
22
22
¦ 70 CODGE
CHALL
35CC
225
S4
1
16
15
16
16
16
AUTOMCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR1ES, IKC^
19900 E. COLFAX AVENUE. AliRCRA, CCLC.
299
-------
YR HAKE HCCEL WEIGHT EKG. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PROJECTED-HID
D1SP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
70
OCOC-E
CHALL
3500
383
A
4
576
559
577
596
595
70
70
DODGE
DCDGE
CHALL
CHALL
35C0
35CC
363
383
A
A
4
4
135
ICC
131
97
136
1C1
140
1C4
140
1C4
70
70
DCDGE
CCDGE
COPCN
CCFCN
35CC
35C0
225
225
A
S3
1
1
124
3
120
3
124
3
128
3
128
3
7C
CCDGE
CCPCN
35CC
225
S4
1
7
7
7
e
8
70
70
CGDGE
CCDGE
CGRCM
CORCN
35CC
35C0
318
318
A
S3
2
2
7(5
21
742
21
166
21
791
22
790
22
70
70
CCDGE
CCDGE
CCRCN
CCPCfo
35C0
3500
318
383
S4
A
2
4
47
254
46
246
47
254
49
262
49
262
. 70
CCDGE
CCPCN
3500
383
S3
4
7
6
7
7
7
7C
70
CCDGE
CCDGE
CCPCN
CCRCN
35 CO
35CC
383
440
S4
A
4
4
15
127
15
123
15
127
It
121
16
131
70
70
DCDGE
CCDGE
CGRCK
CORCN
35CC
35CC
440
44C
53
54
4
4
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
8
3
8
7C
CCCGE
CHARG
35CC
225
A
1
2
2
2
2
2
70
7C
CCCGE
CCDGE
CKARG
CHAPG
35C0
35CC
225
225
53 -
54
1
1
C
C
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
r>
C
70
70
CCCGE
CCDC-E
CHAPG
CH/RG
35C0
35C3
44C
440 ¦
A
S3
4
4
520
7
5C4
7
521
¦ 7
537
7
537
7
7C
CCOOE
CH/RG
35CC
44C
S4
4
41
40
41
42
42
70
70
DCDGE
CCDGE
PCLAR
PCL#R
45CC
45CC
318
318
A
S3
2
2
699
2
678
2
701
2
723
2
723
. 2
7C
7C
DODGE
CCDGE
FC-MC
STAWA
4500
0
383
0
A
C
2
C
345
ect
335
see
346
607
357
627
357
626
7C
FCRD
HAVER
2750
17C
A
1
2C66
2C21
2C79
2136
2115
70
70
FORD
FORD
HAVER
FALCC
275C
30CC
170
200
S3
A
1
1
579
372
566
364
583
375
599
365
593
381
70
70
FCRC
FORC
FALCO
FALCC
3CC0
3CCC
200
3C2
S3
A
1
2
62
86
81
84
63
86
£5
£9
£4
ee
7C
FCRD
FALCC
3CC0
302
S3
2
19
18
19
19
19
70
70
FORD
FCRD
FAIRL
FAIRL
35CC
35CG
25C
25C
A
S3
1
1
471
47
460
46
473
46
487
49
482
49
70
7C
FORD
FCRD
FAIRL
FAIRL
35CC
4CCC
25C
302
54
A
1
2
25
3CS7
24
3020
25
2116
25
32C3
25
3171
70
FORD
FAIRL
4C0C
302
S3
2
314
3C7
316
325
322
-
70
70
FCRD
FORD
FAIRL
CUSTG
4CC0
4CCG
302
24C
S4
A
2
1
164
13
160
12
165
13
17C
13
166
13
70
7C
FCRO
FCRD
ClISTC
CUSTC
4GCC
4CCC
240
302
S3
A
1
2
C
13C5
0
1277
C
1313
C
135C
C
1337
70
FCRD
CLISTC
4000
302
S3
2
13
12
13
13
13
7C
70
FCRD
FCRC
GALAX
GALCX
4CCC
40C0
240
24C
A
S3
1
1
92
1
90
1
92
1
95
1
94
1
7C
70
FCRD
FCRD
GALAX
C-ALAX
4CC0
^CCC
3C2
3C2
A
S3
2
2
4757
97
46 54
94
4787
97
4920
ICC
4871
99
AUTCPCTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCR US,_ INC_._
1S9CC E. CCLFAX AVEME, ALRCPA." CCIC.
300
-------
V R
PAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENC.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRGJECTED-MID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
70
FCRD
LTC
40G0
351
A
2
1949
19C6
1961
2015
1995
70
FORD
LTC
4CCC
351
S3
2
39
38
40
41
4G
70
FCRD
MUST A
3CCG
20C
A
1
271
265
272
260
277
70
FCRD
MUSTA
30CC
20C
S3
1
52
51
52
54
53
70
FCRO
MUSTA
30CC
200
S4
1
39
38
39
4C
40
70
FORD
ML'STA
3CCC
302
A
2
eee
869
894
916
9C9
70
FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
302
S3
2
171
1(8
173
177
176
7C
FORD
MUSTA
3CCC
302
S4
2
130
127
130
134
133
70
FORD
MUSTA
350C
351
A
4
tie
6C5
622
639
633
7C
FCRO
MCSTA
3500
351
S3
4
119
117
12C
123
12 2
70
FCRD
MUSTA
35CC
351
S4
4
9C
88
91
93
92
70
FORD
TBIRC
45C0
429
A
4
626
614
632
649
643
70
FCRD
STAhA
C
0
0
3EC6
3724
383G
3936
3697
70
IMPER
CRCVtN
50CG
440
A
4
96
103
106
109
112
7C
IMPER
LEeAR
5CCC
440
A
4
7
7
7
6
8
70
L1NCC
CCNTI
5CC0
46C
A
4
288
363
379
396
4U
70
LINCO
MARK3
5CC0
460
A
4
233
218
227
237
247
7C
MERCU
MOME
35C0
25C
A
1
iec
166
169
171
174
7C-
MERCU
MCNTt
35CC
25C
S3
1
8
e
8
8
e
70
HERCU
fCKTE
35CC
250
S4
1
K
5
5
5
5
7C
MERCU
MONTE
35CC
302
A
2
12C4
1114
1132
1151
1169
70
KERCU
MCNTE
35G0
302
S3
2
56
54
55
55
56
70
MERCU
MCNTE
35C0
3C2
S4
2
37
34
35
36
36
70
KERCU
MONTR
4CC0
390
A
2
171
158
161
163
166
70
HERCU
MONTR
4CCC
390
S3
2
C
0
0
C
0
70
KERCU
MAPCU
45CC
390
A
2
171
158
161
162
166
70
MERCU
MARCU
45CC
39C
S3
2
0
0
0
0
0
7C
MERCU
MARCU
45C0
429
A
4
215
198
2C2
205
2C8
70
MERCU
COLGA
35CC
302
A
2
565
522
531
54 C
548
70
MERCU
COUCA
35C0
302
S3
2
30
28
26
29
29
70
MERCU
COLC-A
35CC
•302
S4
2
17
15
16
16
16
70
MEP.CU
COUGA
35CC
351
A
4
377
348
354
360
365
70
MERCU
COUGA
3SC0
351
S3
4
20
18
19
19
19
70
MERCU
COUCA
3530
351
S4
4
11
1C
1C
10
11
70
MERCU
STAM
C
C
0
0
731
676
6e7
696
710
70
CLDSM
F-85
35CG
25C
A
1
51
4 5
47
46
50
70
OLDSM
F-85
35CC
250
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
70
CLDSH
F-85
35C0
250
S4
1
1
1
1
1
1
7C
C-LDSM
F-85
4CC0
35C
A
2
2397
2142
2221
2299
2378
70
OLDSM
F-85
4CCC
350
S3
2
24
22
23
23
24
70
CLDSM
F-e5
4CC0
350
S4
2
74
66
69
71
74
70
OLCSM
F-85
4CCC
455
A
4
1G2
91
94
97
101
7C
CLDSM
F-85
4CCG
455
S3
4
1
C
0
1
1
70
CLDSM
F-85
4CCC
455
54
4
3
2
2
3
3
70
CLDSK
DELES
45CG
350
A
2
95C
849
8BC
911
943
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCR IES» IKC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AUfiCRA, CCLC.
301
-------
YR HAKE HOCEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CAR0 REGISTEREC PROJECTEC-MID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
7C
CLDSH
DEL88
45C0
455
A
4
761
68C
705
73C
755
70
70
CLCSM
CLDSK
98
TOPCN
45C0
45C0
455
455
A
A
4
4
768
221
686
197
711
205
737
212
762
2 IS
70
70
CLDSM
PLYKG
ST Ah A
VALIA
0
BOCC
C
198
G
A
0
1
358
1129
320
1C 57
331
1CE4
343
1111
355
111C
70
PLYHO
VALIA
3CCC
198
S3
1
312
292
3CC
3C7
3C7
70
70
PLYKG
PLYKC
VALIA
VALIA
3GC0
35CC
193
318
S4
A
1
2
46
311
43
291
44
299
45
3C6
45
3C6
70
70
PLYKC
PLYK.O
VALIA
VALIA
3 5 CO
35CC
313
318
53
54
2
2
66
12
EC
11
62
12
84
12
64
12
70
PLYKC
VALIA
35CC
340
A
4
116
ICS
112
115
114
7C
7C
PLYHO
PLYHC
VALIA
VALIA
35CC
35CC
34 C
34C
53
54
4
4
32
4
30
4
31
4
31
4
31
4
7C
70
PLYHO
PLYKG
EELVE
BELVE
35CC
35GG
225
225
A
S3
1
1
1C6
6
99
6
101
6
104
6
1C4
6
70
PLYHO
BELVE
35CC
225
S4
1
15
14
14
15
15
70
7C
PLYHC
PL Yf,0
EELVE
HELVE
3500
35C0
318
318
A
S3
2
2
9C9
55
e»2
52
873
53
895
55
894
55
70
70
PLYKD
PLYKC
EELVE
BELVE
35C0
35CC
318
383
S4
A
2
4
131
112
123
1C5
126
108
129
111
129
11C
70
PLYKC-
EELVE
35CC
383
S3
4
6
6
6
6
6
7C
7G
PLYHO
PLYKC
BELVE
FUPY
35GG
4CCC
383
225
S4
A
4
1
16
113
15
1C5
15
ICE
16
111
16
111
7C
70
PLYHO
PLYKG
FURY
FUPY
4GCG
4CC0
22 5
318
S3
A
1
2
C
2124
0
1989
C
2C4C
0
2C91
C
2C86
7C
PLYHO
FURY
4C0C
318
S3
2
17
16
16
16
16
70
7.0
PLYK.O
PLYKC
FURY
FURY
4000
4CC0
440
44 C
A
S3
4
4
. 22
C
21
0
21
C
22
0
22
0
70
70
PLYKC
PLYMC
BARRA
BARRA
3500
35C0
225
225
A
S3
1
1
4C
3
38
3
38
3
39
3
3S
3
70
PLYKC
BAFRA
35C0
225
S4
1
11
1C
11
11
11
1
j
•J -J1
o ©
PLYKC
PLYKG
BARRA
BARRA
35CC
35CC
383
383
A
S3
2
2
3CC
28
281
26
288
27
295
27
295
27
70
70
PLYHO
PLYKC
BARRA
ST AM
35C0
0
383
C
S4
C
2
• 0
86
542
80
5C7
82
52C
85
533
84
532
70
PONTI
7EHPE
35C0
25C
A
1
131
117
121
125
129
70
70
pcnti
PONTI
TEKFE
TEHPE
3500
35CC
25C
25C
53
54
1
1
6
1C
5
9
6
S
6
9
6
9
o o
r- r-
PCNT1
PCNTI
TEKFE
TEK.PE
40GG
40CC
40C
4CC
A
S3
4
4
1299
65
1162
58
1199
60
1237
62
1275
64
70
PCNTI
TEKPE
40CC
400
S4
4
99
69
SI
94
97
70
70
PCNTI
PCNTI
CATAL
EXECU
4 500
45CC
350.
4CC
A
A
4
1687
21 £
15C9
195
155E
2C1
1607
2C7
1656
214
7C
70
PCNTI
PCNTI
BCNNE
GPANP
45CG
4GC0
455
40C
A
A
4
4
671
499
600
446
620
461
63S
475
659
49C
AUTOKCTIVE TESTING LA8CPATCRI ES» INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE, ALKCPA,"CCLC.
-------
YR
MAKE
HDD EL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TA4KS
c*Re
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-HIO
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74 75
70
PCMI
FIPEB
35C0
250
«
1
18
16
17
18 18
70
PONTI
FIREB
35CC
25C
S3
1
1
1
1
1 1
70
FCNTI
FIFEB
35C0
25C
S4
1
2
2
2
2 2
7C
PONTI
FIREB
35C0
350
it
2
277
248
256
264 272
70
PC NT I
FIREE
3500
350
S3
2
25
22
23
24 24
70
PONTI
FIREB
35C0
350
S4
2
42
37
3 9
4C 41
70
PCNTI
STAfcA
0
0
0
0
47C
421
434
446 462
70
IMPCR.
VOLKS
225C
C
0
C
6tC5
7856
8261
87C5 9130
70
IHPGP
TOYCT
25C0
0 .
0
0
2795
2552
2<9C
2G28 2966
70
IKPCR
DATSL
225C
0
c
0
152C
i3ee
1463
1536 1613
70
IMPCR
CPEL
2250
0
0
c
125E
1148
121C
1273 1335
70
IMPCR
VCLVC
30 CO
c
0
0
675
616
650
663 716
70
IKPCR
GTFER
225C
c
0
c
375E
3430
3616
3EC2 3987 •
303
-------
yr"
KAKE
hcoel
WEIGHT
eng;
TRAKS
CAKE
REGISTERED
PRGJECTEC-MID
OISP
TVPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
69
AHMGT
AMERI
3000
199
A
1
571
681
703
726
748
69
AMMOT
AMERI
3CC0
199
S3
1
265
315
326
336
347
69
ACC.CT
AMERI
30CC
199
S4
1
IB
22
23
24
24
69
AMMOT
AMERI
3CCC
29C
A
2
2e
34
35
36
37
69
AKKCT
AMERI
30C0
290
S3
2
13
15
16
16
17
69
AMMOT
AMERI
3CCC
29C
S4
2
0
1
1
1
1
69
AKMGT
REBEL
3500
232
A
1
2C4
243
251
259
267
69
AMMCT
REeEL
35CC
232
S3
1
13
16
17
17
18
69
AKKCT
REEEL
35C0
290 .
A
2
239
284
294
3C3
313
69
AMMOT
REEEL
35CC
29C
S3
2
16
19
19
2C
21
69
AKH.CT
AMBAS
3500
232
A
1
5B
70
72
74
77
69
AMMCT
AMBAS
35CC
232
S3
1
3
4
4
4
4
69
AMXCT
AKEAS
4CC0
290
A
2
617
735
759
7 64
8C8
69
AMHOT
AMeiS
40C0
29C
S3
2
36
43
45
46
47
69
AKKCT
JAVEL
3G0C
232
A
1
7C
63
86
69
92
69
AMMOT
JAVEL
30CC
23 2
S3
1
ie
22
23
23
24
69
AMKCT
JAVEL
3000
232
S4
1
10
12
13
13
13
69
AMMOT
JAVEL
35CC
29C
A
2
215
256
265
273
2e 2
69
AKHCT
JAVEL
35C0
29C
S3
2
E7
68
70
73
75
69
AHKCT
JAVEL
35C0
290
S4
2
32
39
40
41
42
69
AKf.CT
AtfX
35C0
290
A
4
30
36
37
39
40
69
AKKCT
AMX
35 CC
29C
S4
4
46
58
60
61
63
69
BUICK
SPEC I
350C
25C
A
1
54
48
50
51
51
69
BUICK
SPEC I
35CC
25C
S3
1
1
1
1
1
1
69
dUICK
SPcCI
35CC
35C
A
2
1297
1162
1203
1243
1239
69
euiCK
SPEC I
35CC
350
S3
2
35
32
33
34
34
69
BUICK
LESAd
45C0
35C
A
2
1363
1222
1264
1307
1302
69
8LICK
kILCC
45C0
430
A
4
5C2
449
465
461
479
69
EUICK
ELECT
45CC
43C
A
4
991
888
919
951
947
69
BUICK
RIV1E
45C0
430
A
4
3 9C
349
362
374
373
69
euiCK
STAVA
C
0
0
0
266
238
247
255
254
69
CADIL
CALAI
5000
472
A
4
124
118
123
126
133
69
CADIL
DEVIL
50CC
472
A
4
1222
1158
12C9
1259
1310
69
CADIL
FLEET
500C
472
A
.4
130
124
129
134
140
69
CACIL
ELDCR
5CCC
472
A
• 4
174
165
172
179
187
69
CKEVR
CORVA
27SC
164
A
2
37
34
35
34
34
69
CHEVR
CCP.VA
27 5 0
164
S3
2
7
6
6
6
6
69
CHE VR
CCPVA
275C
164
S4
2
7
6
6
t
6
69
CHtVR
CHEV2
3CCC
153
A
1
3E
35
36
36
35
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
153
S3
1
14
13
13
13
13
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
153
S4
1
3
2
2
2
2
69
ChEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
23C
A
1
lClfc
933
957
952
939
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
23C
S3
1
3E3
351
3tC
356
353
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
3uCC
23C
S4
1
£3
76
78
77
76
69
CHE VP
CHEV2
3CCC
327
A
2
561
515
528
525
518
AUT0PCT1VE TESTING LABCRATCP 1ESj,_I
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AURORA. CCLC.
304
-------
YR
MAKE
MOCEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARe
REGISTERED
PROJECTEC-KID
01SP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
30C0
327
S3
2
211
193
198
197
195
69
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
327
S4 .
2
45
42
43
42
42
69
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
23C
A
1
328
301
308
307
3C3
69
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
230
S3
1
4C
37
36
37
37
69
CHEVR
CHfcVE
35CC
230
S4
1
4 S
45
46
46
46
69
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
327
A
2
2685
2461
2523
2510
2477
69
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
327
S3
2
332
3G4
312
31C
306
69
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CG
327
S4
2
4C7
373
383
3E0
376
69
CHEVR
BISCA
4000
250
A
1
29
27
27
27
27
69
CHEVR
BISCA
4000
250
S3
1
1
1
1
1
1
69
CHEVR
BISCA
4000
327
A
2
657
602
618
614
606
69
CHEVR
BISCA
4000
327
S3
2
27
25
25
25
25
69
CHEVR
EELAI
400C
250
A
1
44
4C
41
41
40
69
CHEVR
BELAI
4000
250
S3
1
1
1
1
1
1
69
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
327
A
2
1247
1143
1172
1165
1150
69
CHEVR
BELAI
400C
327
S3
2
51
47
48
46
47
69
CHEVR
IMPAL
4000
250
A "
1
213
195
200
199
197
69
CHEVR
IKPAL
4000
250
S3
1
e
8
8
8
8
69
CKEVR
IMPAL
4CCG
327
A
2
6C12
5510
5651
5620
5547
69
CHEVR
IMPAL
4000
327
S3
2
25C
2 29
235
234
231
69
CHEVR
CAPRI
4CC0
327
A
¦ 4
1C55
967
992
9e6
973
69
CHEVR
CAPRI
4000
327
S3
4
21
19
2C
2C
19
69
CHEVR
CAMER
35CG
23C
A
1
ie3
168
172
171
169
69
CHEVR
CAKEP.
35G0
230
S3
1
58
54
55
55
54
69
CHEVR
CAKER
3500
23C
S4
1
76
69
71
71
70
69
CHEVR
CAPEF,
3500
327
A
2
1C4C
953
977
972
959
69
CHEVR
CAP.EP,
35C0
327
S3
2
334
306
314
312
3C8
69
CHEVR
CAPER
3500
327
S4
2
431
395
4C5
4C3
398
69
CHEVR
COP VE
35CC
350
A
4
70
64
66
65
64
69
CHEVR
CORVE
350C
350
S3
4
3
2
2
2
2
69
CHEVR
CCRVE
35CC
350
S4
4
266
243
250
248
245
69
CHEVR
STAKA
C
0
0
0
1EC7
1656
1699
1689
1667
69
CHRYS
UEVPC
45CC
383
A
2
1393
1230
1254
127S
1276
69
CHRYS
NEWPC
45CC
383
S3
2
2
2
2
2
2
69
CHRYS
300
45C0
440
A
4
319
282
287
293
292
69
CHRYS
NEWYC
45CC
44C
A
4
4fcC
4C6
414
422
421
69
CHRYS
STAKA
0
0
C
0
226
199
203
207
2C7
69
DCCGE
DART
3CCC
170
A
1
1234
1C78
1112
1111
11C8
69
DCDC-E
DAF.T
3CC0
170
S3
1
124
1C8
112
111
111
69
GCDGE
OART
3CCC
170
S4
1
103
90
93
93
93
69
DCDGE
DART
3CC0
318
A
2
676
59C
6C9
6C9
607
69
DOCGE
DART
30CC
318
S3
2
68
59
61
61
61
69
DCDGE
DART
3CCC
318
S4
2
56
4S
51
51
51
69
DODGE
CORCM
35CC
225
A
1
12C
1C4
108
108
107
69
DCDC-E
CCPCN
3500
225
S3
1
5
4
4
4
4
AUTCHGTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
199C0 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLG.
305
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECIED-KIO
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
69
DCDGE
COFCN
35C0
225
S4
1
11
9
1C
1G
1C
69
CODC-E
CORON
35CC
318
A
2
leee
1475
152 2
1521
1516
69
DCDC-E
CCPCK
3£CC
316
S3
2
77
67
69
69
6S
69
DCDGE
CCPON
3500
316
S4
2
155
139
144
143
143
69
CCDGE
CCFCN
350C
440
A
4
67
58
6C
6G
60
69
DCDCE
CCfiCN
35CC
44C
S3
4
3
2
2
2
2
69
CCDGE
CCPCN
35CC
44C
S4
4
6
5
5
5
5
69
DCDGE
PCLAR
4CCC
3ie
A
2
55E
487
503
502
5C1
69
CCDGE
PCLA3
4COO
318 .
S3
2
1
0
1
1
1
69
DCDGE
MONAC
<1CCC
318
A
2
159
139
143
143
143
69
CCDGE
PCMC
4CCG
318
S3
2
C
0
C
C
C
69
COCGE
HONAC
4CCC
383
A
4
17
15
15
15
15
69
CCDGE
fCKAC
4C0C
383
S3
4
G
0
0
C
0
69
CGCGE
CKARG
35CG
225
A
1
4
3
3
3
3
69
CCDGE
CHARG
3500
225
S3
1
C
0
C
C
0
69
DCDGE
CKARG
35CC
225
S4
1
0
0
c
C
0
69
DCDGE
CKARG
4000
440
A *
4
843
736
76 C
760
757
69
CCDCE
CHARG
4CCG
44G
S3
4
1C
8
9
9
9
69
DCDGE
CK/RG
40C0
440
S4
4
62
71
74
74
74
69
DCDGE
STAWA
0
0
0
621
542
56C
5 59
55e
69
FCRD
FALCC
30C0
17C
A
1
192
185
191
189
184
69
FCRD
FALCC
300C
17C
S3
1
65
63
65
64
63
69
FCRD
FALCC
3CC0
200
A
1
191
1E4
189
iee
183
69
FCRD
FALCO
3 CCC
200
S3
1
65
63
65
64
62
69
FORD
FAIRL
35CG
25C
A
1
435
419
431
426
417
69
FORD
FA JRL
35CC
25C
S3
1
44
42
43
43
42
69
FORD
FAIRL
35CC
25C
S4
1
23
22
22
22
22
69
FCRD
FAIRL
350C
302
A
2
2861
2758
2835
28C7
2745
69
FORC
FAIRL
35CC
3C2
S3
2
29G
280
288
285
278
69
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
302
S4
2
151
146
150
149
145
69
FORD
CUSTO
4CCC
240
A
1
22
21
22
22
21
69
FORD
CUSTC
40CO
24C
S3
1
C
0
0
0
0
69
FORD
CUSTO
4CC0
3C2
A
2
1177
1135
1167
1155
1130
69
FCRD
CUSTC
4000
302
S3
2
24
23
23
23
23
69
FCRD
GALAX
4C0C
24C
A
1
84
81
• 83
83
81
69
FGRD
GALAX
400G
240
S3
1
1
1
1
1
1
69
FCRD
GALAX
4CCC
302
A
2
4374
4217
4334
42S1
4197
69
FCRD
GALAX
4000
302
S3
2
89
ee
68
£7
85
69
FCRD
LTD
4CC0
302
A
2
1792
1727
1775
1758
1719
69
FCRD
LTD
4CCG
3C2
A
2
36
35
36
35
35
69
FCRD
KUSTA
3CC0
200
A
1
22C
212
218
216
211
69
FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
20 C
S3
53
51
52
52
51
69
FORD
ML'STA
3CCC
2CC
S4
1
36
35
36
35
34
69
FCRD
HUSTA
35CC
250
A
165
178
183
1 £2
178
69
FCRD
KUSTA
35CC
250
S3
1
44
43
44
44
43
AUTCKGTIVE TESTING LABCRAJCRIE S.. INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLC.
306
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARe
REGISTEREC
PROJECTEC-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
69
FORD
HUSTA
35C0
25C
S4
1
3C
29
30
29
29
69
FCRD
HUSTA
35C0
3C2
A
2
1546
1490
1531
1516
1483
69
FORD
HUSTA
35CC
3C2
S3
2
373
36C
370
366
358
69
FCRD
HUSTA
35CC
302
S4
2
254
245
252
249
244
69
FORD
HUSTA
35CC
351
A
2
256
247
253
251
245
69
FCRD
HUSTA
35CC
351
S3
2
61
59
61
6C
59
69
FCRD
HUSTA
35CC
351
S4
2
42
4C
41
41
40
69
FCRD
TBIRC
45CG
429
A
4
5C7
489
5C2
497
486
69
FORD
STAkA
C
C .
0
0
3500
3374
3468
3433
3358
69
IKPER
CRCh'N
5000
440
A
4
149
132
136
139
143
6S
IHPER
LEBAR
SCCC
440
A
4
1C9
96
99
1C2
1C5
69
LIKCC
CCNTI
55CO
460
A
4
481
478
498
519
511
69
LINCO
MARIO
5CCC
46C
A
4
289
286
299
311
3Cfc
69
HERCU
MC-KTE
3500
25C
A
1
196
17e
181
184
179
69
HERCU
MCNTE
35C0
25C
S3
1
12
11
11
11
11
69
HERCU
MONTE
3500
250
54
1
3
3
3
3
3
69
HERCU
MCNTE
3500
302
A *
2
13C4
1186
1205
1225
1190
69
HEPCU
HCKTE
3500
302
S3
2
ei
74
75
76
74
69
HERCU
HCKTE
35CC
302
S4
2
25
23
23
23
23
69
HERCU
HGNTR
40CC
39C
A
2
166
169
171
174
169
69
HEPCl1
HCNTR
4CC0
390
S3
2
C
C
C
C
0
69
HERCU
MARC'U
45C0
39C
A
2
186
169
171
174
169
69
HERCU
MARCU
45C0
390
S3
2
0
0
0
C
0
69
HERCU
HAP AU
45C0
429
A
4
233
212
216
219
213
69
HEPCU
CGUGA
3500
351
A
2
1243
1130
1149
1167
1134
69
KERCH
CCL'GA
35CC
351
S3
2
1C4
94
96
97
95
• 69
HERCU
CCUGA
3500
351
S4
2
43
39
39
40
39
69
HERCU
STAKA
0
0
0
0
794
722
734
746
725
69
CLDSM
F-85
3500
25C
A
1
52
48
50
52
51
69
CLDSH
F—65
35C0
250
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
69
CLDSH
F-85
35C0
25C
S4
1
2
2
2
2
2
69
OLDSM
F—65
35C0
35C
A
2
2149
1980
2050
212C
2105
69
CLDSM
F-E5
35C0
35C
S3
2
39
26
37
38
38
69
OLDSH
F-85
35C0
35C
S4
2
112
1C3
107
111
110
69
OLDSH
DELe8
4CC0
390
A
2
1215
1119
1159
1198
119C
69
OLDSH
DELC8
4CCC
350
S3
2
1 S
1
1
1
1
69
OLDSH
DEL68
4CC0
455
A
4
974
697
928
960
953
69
OLDSH
DELE8
4CC0
455
S3
4
0
0
0
0
0
69
GLDSH
98
45C0
455
A
4
963
9C5
937
969
962
69
CLDSH
TOPON
4500
455
A
4
283
260
270
279
277
69
CLDSH
STAKA
C
0
a
0
45£
422
437
452
448
69
PLYHC
VALIA
3CC0
17C
A
1
8J5
SC5
£25
624
820
69
PLYHC
VALIA
30C0
17C
S3
1
164
1E4
156
156
157
69
PLYMO
VALIA
3CC0
316
A
2
73
69
7C
7C
70
69
PLYMO
VALIA
3CCC
318
S3
?
14
13
13
13
13
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCRIESt INC.
199C0 E. COLFAX AVENUE* AURCRAt COLC.
307
-------
YR
HAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARe
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PRCJECIEC-MID
72 73 74 75
69
PLYMO
EELVE
35CC
225
A
1
140
132
135
135
134
69
69
PLYMC
PLYMC
BELVE
EELVE
35C0
3500
225
225
53
54
1
1
6
38
6
36
6
37
6
37
6
37
69
69
PLYMO
PLYMO
BELVE
BELVE
3500
35C0
318
316
A
S3
2
1783
84
1679
79
1721
81
1719
81
171C
61
69
PLYMC
BELVE
35C0
318
S4
490
462
473
473
470
69
69
PLYMC
PLYMC
FURY
FllPY
4000
4CC0
225
225
A
S3
1
1
47
C
44
0
46
C
45
C
45
0
69
69
PLYMC
PLYMC
FLRY
FURY
40CC
40 CO
318
318
A
S3
2
26C1
34
2450
32
2512
33
2508
33
2494
32
. 69
PLYKO
BARB A
3 C CC
225
A
i
61
58
59
59
59
69
69
PLYMC
PLYMO
fi AFP A
SARR A
3CCC
30 CO
225
225
53
54
i
1
3
8
3
7
3
8
3
8
3
8
69
69
PLYMC
PLYMC
eARRA
BARRA
3500
35C0
318
318
A
S3
2
215
12
2C2
12
207
12
2C7
12
206
12
69
PLYMC
BAPRA
35CC
318
S4
2
29
27
28
26
28
69
69
PLYMC
PCNTI
STAkA
TEMPE
0
35C0
0
250
C
A
1
722
237
689
219
706
226
705
233
702
229
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
TEKPE
TEMPE
35CC
3SCC
25C
250
53
54
1
16
29
14
27
15
28
15
28
15
28
69
PC MI
TEMPE
35C0
400
A
1796
1655
1707
1759
1735
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
TEMPE
TEMPE
35 CC
35CC
40C
40C
53
54
4
4
122
22 2
112
2C5
115
211
119
218
117
215
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
CATAL
CATAL
4500
45CC
40C
40C
A
S3
4
2084
6
1920
5
1980
5
2C41
6
2013
6
69
PCNTI
EXECL'
45CC
4CC
A
4
269
248
256
263
260
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
EXECU
BCNN'E
45CC-
45CC
4CC
420
S3
A
4
4
C
829
0
764
C
788
C
812
0
801
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
ECNNE
GRAKP
45C0
40CO
420
400
S3
A
4
4
2
439
2
4C5
2
417
2
4 3C
2
424
69
PCNTI
GRANP
4CC0
400
S3
4
1
1
1
1
1
69
69
PCNTI
PCNTI
FIREE
FIREE
35C0
35C0
250
2 5C
A
S3
1
1
75
11
69
1C
71
1C
73
11
72
10
69
69
PCNTI
PONTI
FIREE
FIREe
35CC
35CC
25 C
4CC
S4
A
1
4
13
481
12
443
12
457
13
471
12
465
69
PCNTI
FIREB
35CC
400
S3
4
72
67
69
71
70
69
69
PONTI
PCNTI
FIRE8
STAVA
35CC
0
400
0
S4
C
4
0
85
583
78
537
80
554
83
571
82
563
69
69
IMPOR
IMPCR
VQLKS
TQYCT
22 5C
2 5CO
C
0
0
0
0
0
9699
2117
9289
2Ci7
9766
2131
10242 1C719
2235 2339
69
IMPCB
OPEL
225C
0
0
c
1644
1574
1655
1736 1817
69
69
1NPCR
IMPOR
DATSU
FIAT
2250
2CCC
c
0
0
c
c
0
10 56
748
1C12
716
1C63
753
1115 1167
790 827
69
IMPCR
OTHER
2250
0
0
0
3676
3712
39C3
4CS3 42E4
308
-------
VR
HAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
OISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARE
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PRCJECTEE-H1D
72 73 74 75
68
AMMOT
AMERI
3CCC
199
A
1
SC4
425
439
453
435
68
68
A PMCT
AH.MGT
AKERI
AHERI
3C0C
3CCC
199
29C
S3
A
1
2
27 e
IS
235
16
242
17
25C
17
240
17
68
68
APKCT
ANKCT
ACER I
REBEL
30C0
3500
290
232
S3
A
2
1
11
261
9
221
9
228
9
235
9
226
68
APFCT
REEEL
35CC
232
S3
1
32
27
28
29
28
68
68
AKHCT
Af'fCT
REEEL
REBEL
35C0
35CC
2SC
29C
A
S3
2
2
220
27
186
23
192
23
198
24
190
23
68
68
A/'f'CT
AMPCT
AMBAS
AKEAS
35CC
35C0
232
232
A
S3
1
1
41
C
34
C
35
0
36
0
35
0
. 68
AFC.CT
AMEAS
35CC
29C
A
2
479
405
418
430
414
68
68
A KNOT
AHf.CT
AHBAS
JAVEL
35CC
300C
290
232
S3
A
2
1
10
100
9
85
9
87
9
9C
9
86
00 CO'
<4 «o
AMMCT
APKCT
JAVEL
JAVEL
3C0C
3C00
232
232
53
54
1
1
19
15
16
13
16
13
17
14
ie
13
68
AHMCT
JAVEL
3CCC
29C
A
2
219
185
191
197
190
68
68
AKKCT
AKKCT
JAVEL
JAVEL
300C
3CC0
290
2SC
53 -
54
2
2
42
34
35
29
36
29
37
30
36
29
CO 00
* o
AHCCT
AMMOT
AMX
AMX
35C0
35CC
29C
29C
A
S4
4
4
38
31
32
26
33
27
34
28
23
27
68
AKHOT
STAKA
0
0
0
0
381
322
332
343
229
68
68
BUICK
euicx
SPECI
SPECI
35C0
350C
250
250
A
S3
1
1
99
2
113
3
117
117
3
115
3
68
68
BUICK
euiCK
SPECI
SPECI
35CC
35C0
25C
350
54
A
1
2
1
14CE
1
16C8
1
1663
1
1656
1
164C
68
DUICK
SPECI
35CC
350
S3
2
38
43
44
44
44
68
68
euiCK
BUICK
SPECI
LESAB
3500
4CCC
350
35C
S4
A
2
2
17
1274
2C
1456
2G
1505
2C
1499
20
1484
68
68
BUICK
BUICK
LESAB
VtlLDC
4000
45CC
350
430
S3
A
2
4
2
471
2
538
3
556
3
554
2
548
68
buick
MILCC
4500
43C
S3
4
C
C
C
C
0
68
68
BUICK
euiCK
ELECT
RIVIE
45C0
45C0
430
430
A
A
4
4
929
34 e
1C61
297
1C96
411
1C92
4CS
1G81
4C5
^ *
CD OB
BUICK
CAD 1L
STAKA
CALAI
0
5C0C
0
472
0
A
0
4
246
13E
281
151
291
157
290
164
267
162
68
CADIL
DEVIL
5CCC
472
A
4
1356
I486
1548
1610
1597
68
68
CAOIL
CADIL
FLEET
ELCCR
5CC0
5CCC
472
472
A
A
4
4
146
241
160
265
167
276
174
287
172
284
68
68
CHEVR
CHE VR
CORVA
CCRVA
2750
275C
164
164
A
S3
2
2
9C
22 •
96
23
95
23
94
23
92
22
68
CHEVR
CORVA
275C
164
S4
2
16
17
17
17
17
68
68
CHEVR
CHEVR
CHEV2
CHEV2
3CCC
3CC0
153
153
A
S3
1
1
9
2
10
. 2
1C
2
9
2
9
2
68
68
CHEVR
CHEVR
CHEV2
CHEV2
30C0
3CCC
153
23C
S4
A
1
1
C
S7e
0
1C39
C
1C33
0
1020
0
993
AUTCFCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCB IES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE* Al'FCRA, CCLC.
309
-------
VR
PAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-WID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
300C
230
S3
1
23 E
253
252
249
242
68
ChEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
230
S4
1
46
49
49
48
47
66
CHE VR
CHEV2
30C0
307
A
2
369
392
390
384
374
68
CHEVR
CHE V2
3CCC
307
S3
2
9C
95
95
94
91
68
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
3C7
S4
2
17
18
18
18
17
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
23C
A
1
497
528
525
519
5C5
68
CHEVR
CHE VE
3SCC
23C
S3
I
79
84
83
£2
eo
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
23C
S4
1
71
76
75
74
72
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
307
A
2
1957
2079
2068
2041
1986
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
350C
307
S3
2
312
331
329
325
316
. 68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
307
S4
2
2ei
299
297
293
285
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
396
A
4
341
362
36C
355
346
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
396
S3
4
54
57
57
56
55
68
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
396
S4
4
49
52
51
51
49
68
CHEVR
3I5CA
3500
25C
A
1
46
51
51
50
49
68
CHEVR
EISCA
35CC
25C
S3
1
3
3
2
3
3
68
CHEVR
BISCA
4CCC
3C7
A -
2
651
691
688
679
661
68
CHEVR
EISCA
4CC0
307
S3
2
* 46
51
51
EC
49
6e
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
25C
A
1
91
96
96
95
92 ¦
68
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
250
S3
1
6
7
¦ 7
7
6
68
CHEVR
BELAI
4C0C
307
A
2
1230
1307
1299
1263
1248
68
CHEVR
BELAI
40CC
307
S3
2
91
96
96
95
92
68
CHEVR
IHPAL
4CCC
25C
A
I
44C
467
465
459
. 447
68
CHEVR
IMPAl
4CC0
250
S3
1
32
34
34
34
33
68
CHEVR
IfcPAL
4CCC
307
A
2
5941
6313
6278
6196
6031
68
CHEVR
IMPAL
4000
307
S3
2
44C
467
465
459
447
68
CHEVR
CAPRI
4CG0
307
A
2
11C8
1178
1171
1156
1125
ee
CHEVR
CAFRI
4C00
307
S3
2
22
24
23
23
22
68
CHEVR
CAP.ER
. 35C0
230
A
1
258
275
273
27C
262
18
CHEVR
CAKER
35CC
23C
S3
1
99
1C5
1C4
103
ICO
68
CHEVR
CAKER
3500
230
S4
1
9C
96
95
94
92
68
CHEVR
CAhER
' 3£CC
307
A
2
934
992
987
974
948
68
CHEVR
CAfER
3500
307
S3
2
357
3ec
378
373
363 '
68
CHEVR
CAMER
35CC
307
S4
2
327
347
345
341
332
68
CHEVR
CCRVE
35 CO
3*2 7
A
4
5C
54
. 53
53
51
68
CHEVR
COP VE
3 SCO
327
l
4
3
3
3
3
3
68
CHEVR
CORVE
3500
327
S4
4
233
247
246
243
236
68
CHEVR
STAKA
0
0
C
C
2272
2414
24C1
237C
23C7 ¦
68
CHRYS
NEWPC
4000
383
A
2
1489
1733
1767
1763
1752
68
CHRYS
KEVFC
4000
383
S3
2
4
5
5
c
5 "
68
CHRYS
300
4500
440
A
4
336
392
399
3S9
396
68
CHRYS
3CC
45 CC
440
S3
4
1
1
1
1
1
68
CHRYS
NEfcYO
45C0
440
A
4
49C
571
582
581
577
68
CHRYS
STAVA
G
C
C
0
239
279
284
264
282
68
CCEGE
DART
3CC0
17C
A
1
945
9C5
9C4
9C1
e?3
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCD*TCRIES> INC.
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AC'RGRA, CCLC. '
310
-------
YR CAKE KGDEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARE REG1STEREC PROJECTEC-MID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 13 74 75
68
OCCGE
DART
3CCC
170
S3
1
113
1C8
1C8
ice
107
68
68
DCDGE
DODGE
DART
DART
3CC0
30CC
170
273
S4
A
1
2
23
315
22
3C2
22
301
22
300
22
298
68
68
CCDGE
DCCGE
DART
DART
3CCC
30C0
273
273
53
54
2
2
37
7
36
7
36
7
36
7
35
7
68
DCDGE
DART
3500
34C
A
4
53
51
51
51
50
68
68
DCDGE
DCCGE
DART
DART
35C0
3500
34C
- 34C
53
54
4 '
4
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
6
1
CO cu
>o >0
DCDGE
CODGE
CCRCN
CGRCN
35CC
35CC
225
225
A
S3
1
1
183
IS
175
18
175
18
175
18
173
18
68
DCDGE
CCRCN
35CC
225
S4
1
6
6
6
6
6
68
68
DODGE
DCCGE
CORON
CCRCN
35CC
35C0
273
273
A
S3
2
2
1C71
113
1C25
1C8
1024
1C8
1021
1C8
1012
107
00 CD
ALRCRA, CCLC.
311
-------
YR HAKE KCDEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PRCJECTED-H1D
D1SP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
68
FCRD
GALAX
4CCC
3C2
S3
2
90
B3
E2
EC
77
68
FCRD
LTD
40CG
3G2
A
2
1523
1402
1388
1358
13CC
68
FCRC
LTD
4CCC
3C2
S3
2
6
5
5
c
5
68
FCRD
HUSTA
3CC0
20C
A
1
609
560
555
543
520
68
FCRC
KUSTA
3CCG
2 GC
S3
1
191
176
175
171
163
68
FORD
HUSTA
3CCC
20C
S4
1
48
44
44
43
41
68
FCRC
MUSTA
3CCC
289
A
2
1469
1353
1339
131C
1255
68
FORD
ML'STA
3CCC
289
S3
2
463
426
422
413
395
68
FCRD
MUSTA
3GC0
289
S4
2
116
1C7
1C£
1G4
99
68
FCPD
TEIRC
45CG
39C
A
4
6C9
561
556
543
520
68
FCRD
ST AM
0
0
0
0
2916
26E6
26 59
26C1
2491
68
IKPER
CRCfeN
5CC0
440
A
4
134
14C
144
148
145
68
IKPER
LEEAP
500C
44 C
A
4
93
98
1C1
1C4
1C1
68
LINCC
CCNTI
55C0
462
A
4
325
376
391
385
374
68
LINCG
MARK3
5CCC
462
A
4
105
122
127
125
122
68
HEPCU
MGNTE
35CC
20C
A
1
1C4
ICC
102
99
94
68
HERCU
MONTE
3SCG
20C
S3-
1
8
8
8
8
7
68
KERCU
MONT E
35CC
2GC
S4
1
2
2
2
2
1
68
HERCU
MONTE
35CC
3G2
A
2
1G3C
996
1012
983
933
68
HERCU
MONTE
35 CC
302
S3
2
65
62
83
ei
77
68
HERCU
MONTE
35CC
3C2
v>
2
21
20
21
2C
19
68
KERCU
MONTR
4000
390
A
2
661
639
650
631
599
66
HERCU
MONTR
40GG
390
S3
2
2
2
2
2
2
68
KERCU
K.CNTC
4GC0
390
A
2
162
157
159
155
147
68
HERCU
MGNTC
4GCC
390
S3
2
C
C
0
C
0
68
HERCU
M/PCU
4C0C
39C
A
4
2C6
2CC
2C3
197
187
68
MERCU
COLGA
35CO
3G2
A
2
1C96
1C60
1077
1046
953
68
KERCU
CCUGA
35CC
302
S3
2
132
128
13C
126
12C
68
KERCU
COLGA
350C
302
S4
2
34
32
33
32
30
68
HERCU
STAkA
C
0
C
0
707
664
695
675
641
68
CLDSM
F-85
35CC
25C
A
1
78
86
89
89
87
68
CLDSK
F-85
35CC
25 C
S3
1
2
2
3
3
2
68
CLDSM
F-85
35C0
25 C
S4
1
4
5
C
5
5
68
CLCSM
F-65
35CC
35C
A
1
165
162
186
187
183
68
CLDSM
F-e5
35CC
350
A
2
79
87
90
£9
68
68
CLCSM
F-85
35C0
35 C
S3
2
26
29
3C
3C
29
68
CLDSK
F-E5
35 CC
35 C
S4
2
48
54
56
55
54
68
CLDSM
F-85
35 C C
400
A
4
313
346
358
356
349
68
CLDSK
F-85
35CC
40C
S3
4
1C
11
12
12
11
66
OLGSM
F-85
35CC
4CC
S4
4
19
21
22
22
21
68
CLDSK,
DELKC
4CCC
35C
A
2
994
11CC
1138
113C
11C9
68
CLDSM
DELMO
4CCC
350
S3
2
2
3
3
3
3
68
CLDSK
DELTA
45CC
455
A
4
796
881
911
905
888
68
OLDSM
98
4 5 CC
455
A
4
EC4
89C
92C
914
897
68
CLDSK
TCPCN
450C
455
A
4
217
24 L
248
246
242
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCPIES, INC.
199C0 E. CCLF4X AVENUE, AURORA, CCLC.
312
-------
YR
" MAKE
MO O EL
WEIGHT
ENG."
TRANS
CARe
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEC-HIC
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JUL Y 1971
72
73
74
75
68
GLDSH
STAVA
C
0
0
0
378
418
432
429
421
68
PLYKC
VALIA
3CC0
17C
A
1
644
626
625
621
613
68
PLYHO
VALIA
3CCC
I7C
S3
1
146
144
143
143
141
68
PLYHO
VALIA
3000
273
A
2
57
55
55
55
54
68
PLYKC
VALIA
3CC0
273
S3
2
13
12
12
12
12
68
PLYKC
eELVE
35C0
225
A
1
153
187
1£7
1E6
183
68
PL Yf.O
BELVE
3SCC
225
S3
1
15
15
15
14
14
68
PLYKO
eELVE
3500
225
S4
1
3C
29
29
29
28
68
PLYHO
BELVE
350C
273
A
2
1442
14C2
1399
1392
1372
68
PLYHO
BELVE
35C0
273
S3
2
116
112
112
112
110
68
PLYMG
EELVE
350C
273
S4
2
226
22C
22C
21£
215
68
PLYf.O
FURY
4CC0
225
A
1
75
73
72
72
71
68
PLYHt
FURY
AC CO
225
S3
1
2
2
2
2
2
68
PLYHO
FURY
4CC0
318
A
2
3C5S
2973
2968
2953
2911
68
PLYKC
FURY
4000
318
S3
2
97
95
94
94
93
68
PLYHO
VIP
40C0
318
A
2
138
135
134
134
132
68
PLYKC
BARRA
3000
225
A -
1
92
e?
89
89
87
68
PLYHO
BAPRA
3CCC
225
S3
1
6
6
6
6
6
68
PLYKC
3AFRA
3CC0
225
S4
1
1C
9
9
9
9
68
PLYHO
3APRA
3CCC
318
A
2
234
228
227
226
223
68
PLYK.C
BARRA
3000
318
S3
2
18
17
17
17
17
68
PLYHO
BARRA
30CC
318
S4
2
25
24
24
24
24
68
PLYKC
BARRA
3500
340
A
4
8
8
8
8
7
68
PLYKC
BARRA
350C
340
S3
4
0
0
0
C
0
68
PLYKO
BARRA
35CC
34C
S4
4
G
c
0
C
0
68
PLYKC
STAVA
C
0
C
0
833
81C
see
8C4
793
68
PONTI
TEHPE
3500
25C
A
1
SCO
412
425
419
4C8
68
PONTI
TEHPE
35C0
25C
S3
1
32
35
36
35
34
68
PCNTI
TEK.PE
35CC
250
S4
I
48
52
54
53
51
68
PCNTI
TEHPE
35CC
35C
A
2
1986
2159
2225
2194
2135
68
PCNTI
TEKPE
35C0
350
S3
2
168
183
iee
186
161
68
PONTI
TEK.PE
35CC
350
S4
2
252
274
283
279
271
68
PCM I
TEK.PE
35CC
40C
A
4
116
126
13C
12E
125
68
PCNTI
TEKPE
35CC
400
S3
4
24
26
26
26
25
68
PCNTI
TEKPE
35CC
40C
S4
4
14
16
16
16
15
68
PCNTI
CATAL
45CC
400
A
4
2191
23ei
2453
242C
2354
68
PCNTI
CATAL
45CC
400
S3
15
16
17
17
16
68
PCNTI
EXECU
45CC
4CC
A
283
3C8
317
313
205
68
PCNTI
EXECU
45CG
400
S3
4
2
2
2
2
2
68
PCNTI
BONNE
45CC
4CC
A
4
875
951
98C
966
94C
68
PCNTI
GRANF
45GC
400
A
4
464
5C4
52C
513
499
68
PCNTI
FIREB
35C0
250
A
1
1C4
114
117
115
112
68
PCNTI
F1PEB
35C0
250
S3
1
20
22
23
22
22
68
PONTI
FIREB
35CC
25C
S4
1
25
27
28
28
27
68
PCNTI
FIREe
35CC
35C
A
2
5C1
£45
561
554
539
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING IABCRATCRIES, IKC.
199CC E. CCLFAX AVENUE, ALiHCRA, CCLC.
313
-------
YR KAKE KOCtL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTERED PRCJECTED-M10
DISP TYPE TYPE JlltY 1971 72 73 74 75
68 PCNTI FI BE E_ 35C0 35C_ S3 2 S9 1C7 111 __1 CS _ _1C6_
68 PONTI FIREB 35CC 350 S4 2 123 133 137 135" 132
68 PCNTI STAkA C 0 0 C 616 6C9 6SC 66C 6fc2
31U
-------
YR
PAKE
MCCEL
MEICHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECIED-KIO
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
67
AKMCT
AKERI
3Q0C
199
A
1
437
483
49E
479
447
67
AKMCT
AMERI
3CC0
1SS
S3
1
257
284
293
2E2
263
67
AK.HCT
AK.ER I
30C0
199
S4
1
1C
11
12
11
11
67
AFMCT
PEeEL
35C0
232
A
1
400
443
456
439
409
67
AMMCT
REEEL
35C0
232
S3
1
48
53
55
53
49
67
AKMCT
REBEL
35CC
232
54
1
5
6
6
6
5
67
AKMCT
REBEL
35CO
290
A
2
338
374
386
371
346
67
AfMCT
REBEL
35CC
25C
S3
2
40
45
46
44
41
67
AKKCT
KEfcEL
35C0
29G
S4
2
4
5
5
5
4
67
Af FCT
AKEAS
35C0
232
A
1
1C6
117
121
116
1C8
67
A*KCT
AMEAS
35CC
232
S3
1
4
4
4
4
4
67
AfKCT
AMUAS
35C0
290
A
2
414
453
472
454
423
67
Af.wCT
AHEAS
35CC
2SC
S3
16
18
19
18
17
67
AMMCT
KARL I
3500
232
A
1
2C
22
23
22
21
67
AMMOT
MARL I
35CC
232
S3
1
0
0
0
C
0
67
AfMCT
t-.APLI
35C0
232
54
1
c
0
C
C
•
67
AMPGT
MARLI
35CC
290
A -
2
126
140
144
133
129
67
AfKCT
MARLI
35C0
290
S3
2
2
2
3
2
2
67
AHMOT
MARLI
35CC
290
54
5
5
5
5
5
67
buick
SPEC I
3500
225
A
1
123
135
134
133
13C
67
euiCK
SPEC I
35C0
225
S3
1
4
5
5
5
5
67
BUICK
SPECI
35C0
225
S4
1
1
2
2
2
2
67
BUICK
SPEC I
35C0
300
A
2
1CS6
1203
1199
1187
1159
67
BUICK
SPECI
3500
300
S3
2
. 42
46
46
46
45
67
BUICK
SPECI
35C0
30C
S4
2
17
19
18
18
18
67
euiCK
LESAB
4CC0
340
A
2
114C
1251
1247
1234
1205
67
BUICK
LESAB
4CC0
340
S3
2
1
1
1
1
1
67
BUICK
tilLDC
4500
430
A
4
485
532
530
525
513
67
BUICK
kILCC
45C0
430
S3
4
0
0
C
0
0
67
BUICK
ELECT
45CC
43 C
A
4
825
9C6
902
893
872
67
BUICK
ELECT
45C0
430
S3
4
0
0
C
0
0
67
BUICK
RIVIE
45CC
430
A
4
321
353
351
348
340
67
BUICK
STAKA
C
C
C
214
235
234
232
226
67
CADIL
CALAI
5CCC
429
A
4
175
192
2CC
198
195
67
CACIL
DEVIL
50CC
4*29
A
4
1216
1338
1392
1361
1362
67
CAOIL
FLEET
50C0
429
A
4
147
161
168
166
164
67
CACIL
ELDCR
50C0
429
A
196
215
224
222
219
67
CHEVR
CORVA
27SC
164
A
2
149
148
146
143
136
67
CHEVR
CORVA
2750
164
S3
38
37
37
36
34
67
CHEVR
CORVA
275C
164
S4
2
32
32
32
31
29
67
CHEVR
CHEV2
32CC
153
A
1
34
34
33
32
31
67
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
153
S3
1
12
12
12
12
11
67
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
153
S4
1
2
2
2
2
2
67
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
194
A
1
43C
428
422
411
391
67
CHEVR
CHEV2
3000
194
S3
1
iei
160
15e
154
146
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABGRATCR1ES» INC._
19900 t. CCLFAX AVENUE, AUKCRA, CCLC.
315
-------
YR K.AKE MODEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PROJECT EC-HID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
67 CHEVR CHEV2 3CC0 _194 ._ S4 1 35 35 35 34 32
67 CHEVR CHEV2 3CCG 2E3 A 2 ISC 149147 143 136
67 CHEVR CHEV2 3CC0 2e3 S3 2 56 55 55 53 SI
67 CHEVR CHEV2 3CCC 283 S4 2 12 12 12 11 11
67 CHEVR CHEVE 3CCC 23C A 1 466 465 45S 447 425
67
CHEVR
CHEVE
30CC
23C
S3
1
?9
99
57
95
90
67
CHEVR
CHEVE
30CO
23C
S4
1
1C2
1C1
ICO
97
93
67
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC-
283
A
2
1£4 1
1632
1611
1568
1491
67
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
233
S3
2
349
347
343
334
317
67
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
283
S4
2
359
357
352
343
326
67
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
250
A
1
73
72
71
69
66
67
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
25C
S3
1
e
8
7
7
7
67
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
250
S4
1
c
G
C
C
0
67
CHEVR
BISCA
4CCG
283
A
2
65 C
647
638
621
591
67
CHEVR
BISCA
4000
283
S3
2
71
71
7C
68
65
67
CHEVR
GISCA
40C0
283
S4
2
e
8
8
8
7
67
CHEVR
BEL A 1
4000
250
A -
1
136
137
135
132
125
67
CHEVR
BELM
4CCC
25C
S3
1
IE
15
14
14
13
67
CHEVR
EEL/I
4C0C
250
S4
1
1
1
1
1
1
67
CHEVR
BELAI
4000
283
A
2
123C
1224
12C8
1176
1118
67
CHEVR
EEL* I
4000
283
S3
2
136
135
133
129
123
67
CHEVR
BELAI
4C CO
283
S4
2
16
16
16
15
IS
67
CHEVR
IKPAL
4CC0
250
A
1
528
525
518
5C4
479
67
CHEVR
IKFAL
4CCC
250
S3
1
58
58
57
55
53
67
CHEVR
IMPAL
40CG
2SC
S4
1
7
7
7
6
6
67
CHEVR
IKPAL
4CCC
263
A
2
47C1
4675
4614
4491
4271
67
CHEVR
I MP#L
40C0
283
S3
2
519
516
509
496
471
67
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
283
S4
2
63
63
62
6C
57
67
CHEVR
CAPRI
4CCC
283
A
2
997
992
979
953
9C6
67
CHEVR
CAPRI
4CGC
283
S3
2
UC
1C9
108
1C-5
ICC
67 CHEVR CAPRI 4CCC 283_ S4_2 13 13 13 12 12
67 CHEVR CAKER 3u00" 23C A 1 268 266 263 256 243
67 CHEVR _CAKEF._ 300C 230 S3 1 1C6 1C5 1C4 1C1 96
67 CHEVR CAKER "3000 230 S4 1 1C2 1C2 ICO St 93
£7 CHEVR CAKER 35G0 327 A 2 739 735 726 706 672
67
CHEVR
CAKER
35C0
327
S3
2
293
291
2 £ 8
2 80
266
67
CHEVR
CAKER
3 5 CC
327
S4
2
283
2ei
277
27C
257
67
CHEVR
CORVE
35CG
327
A
4
21
21
21
20
19
67
CHEVR
CORVE
3 5CC
327
S3
4
4
4
3
3
3
67
CHEVR
CCRVE
35C0
327
S4
4
187
186
164
179
17C
67
CHEVR
STAViA
C
0
0
C
1859
1849
1825
1777
1689
67
CHRYS
NEhPC
4CCG
383
A
2
15C5
1718
1714
17C3
1676
67
CHRYS
NEhPO
4CCC
363
S3
2
4
5
5
5
5
67
CHRYS
300
45C0
44C
A
4
281
32C
320
318
312
67
CHRYS
3CC
45C0
440
S3
4
G
0
C
0
0
AUTCKCT1VE TESTING LABORATORIES, IhC.
199CC E. COLFAX AVEM'E, AURORA, CCLC.
316
-------
YR
HAKE
HOCEL
MElGtiT
ENG.
TRANS
CAR6
RECISTERED
FRCJECT ED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
67
CHRYS
NEWYO
45C0
440
A
4
463
551
550
546
538
67
DODGE
DART
3CC0
17C
A
1
722
721
719
713
696
67
DCCGE
DART
3CCC
17C
S3
1
146
146
146
144
141
67
DCDGE
DART
3CC0
17*
S4
1
14
14
14
13
13
67
DODGE
DART
3GCC
273
A
2
225
225
224
222
217
67
DCDGE
OAPT
3CC0
273
S3
2
45
45
45
45
44
67
DCOGE
DART
3CC0
273
S4
2
4
4
4
4
4
67
DCDGE
CORCN
3500
225
A
1
145
145
144
143
139
67
CGCGE
CORCN
35CC
225.
S3
1
9
9
9
9
9
67
CCDCE
CCPCN
35C0
225
S4
1
2
2.
2
2
2
67
OCOCE
CORCN
3500
273
A
2
109t
1CS5
1092
1082
1C56
67
CCDGE
CCPCN
3500
273
S3
2
71
71
7C
7 C
68
67
CODGE
CORCN
35CC
273
S4
2
2C
20
20
19
19
67
OCDGE
POLAR
4000
318
A
2
316
377
376
373
364
67
DCOGE
PCLAR
40GG
318
S3
2
7
7
7
7
7
67
CCDGE
POLAR
4000
318
S3
2
C
0
0
0
0
67
DCOGE
PCLAR
40C0
383
A -
2
252
251
251
248
243
67
CCDGE
PCLAR
4CGC
383
S3
2
K
5
5
5-
4
67
CCDGE
PCLAR
4CGC
383
S4
2
C
0
0
0
0
67
CODGE
HONAC
4C0C
383
A
2
214
214
213
211
2C6
67
CCDGE
MCNAC
4CCC
383
A
4
71
71
71
7C
68
67
CCDGE
CHARG
40CG
318
A
2
236
236
236
233
2 28
67
CCDGE
CHARG
4CCC
318
S3
2
4
4
4
4
4
67
CODGE
CHARG
40CC
318
S4
2
15
15
15
15
15
67
DCDGE
STAKA
G
G
C
0
522
521
52C
515
503
67
FCRC
FALCC
3CCC
17C
A
1
532
527
515
494
457
67
FCRD
FALCO
3C0C
170
S3
1
243
241
236
226
209
67
FCRD
FALCC
30CC
289
A
2
iec
178
174
167
155
67
FCRD
FALCC
30G0
289
S3
2
62
ei
79
76
70
67
FCRD
FAIPL
30C0
2C0
A
1
258
255
249
239
221
67
FCRD
FAIRL
3CCC
200
S3
1
43
43
42
40
37
67
FORD
FAIRL
3G0C
200
S4
1
14
14
13
13
12
67
FCRD
FAIRL
3000
289
A
2
1417
14C3
1372
1314
1218
67
FORD
FAIRL
30CC
289
S3
2
241
239
. 233
223
207
67
FCRD
FAIRL
3CCC
2*89
S4
2
78
77
76
73
67
67
FCRD
CLSTC
35CC
24C
A
1
64
63
81
78
72
67
FCRD
CUSTO
3500
24C
S3
1
5
5
5
5
4
67
FCRC
CUSTC
4CGC
289
A
2
1545
1549
1515
1451
1345
67
FCRD
CUSTO
4CCC
289
S3
2
1C1
IOC
98
94
87
67
FCRD
GALAX
40CG
240
A
1
223
221
216
2C7
192
67
FCPD
GALAX
4CCC
240
S3
1
14
14
14
13
12
67
FCRD
GALAX
40CC
289
A
2
4159
4117
4027
3857
3573
67
FCRD
GALAX
4CCC
289
S3
2
27C
267
261
25C
232
67
FCRD
LTC
4GC0
240
A
1
58
57
56
54
50
67
FCRD
LTD
4CC0
240
S3
1
¦3
3
3
3
3
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRIES. INC.
199C0 E. COLFAX AVENUE# AURORA, CCLC.
317
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
67
FORD
LTD
4000
289
A
2
1C63
1C73
1049
1CC5
931
67
FCRD
LTD
AC CO
289
S3
2
7C
69
68
65
60
67
FCRD
MUSTA
3COO
200
A
1
9 62
952
931
892
£26
67
FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
200
. S3
X
353
349
342
327
303
67
FCRD
HUSTA
3CCC
20C
S4
1
1C3
102
100
96
89
67
FCRD
MUSTA
3000
289
A
2
2244
2222
2173
2C81
1928
67
FORD
MUSTA
3CC0
289
S3
2
824
816
798
764
708
67
FORD
MUSTA
3CCC
289
S4
2
241
239
234
224
207
67
FCRD
TEIRC
45C0
39C.
A
4
727
720
7C4
674
625
67
FCRD
STAWA
0
0
0
0
2723
2696
2637
2525
234C
67
IP.PER
CHCHN
5CCC
44C
A
4
229
262
269
263
251
67
IKPER
LEEAK
50CC
440
A
4
26
30
31
31
29
67
UNCO
CCNTI
55C0
462
A
4
J 24
564
555
539
514
67
KERCU
CCK. ET
35 CO
200
A
1
235
280
272
258
237
67
HERCU
COMET
35CC
2CC
S3
1
4C
48
46
44
40
67
KERCU
COMET
35CC
200
S4
1
9
11
11
1C
9
67
HERCU
COMET
35 CC
289
A "
2
466
579
562
534
490
67
HERCU
COMET
35 CO
289
S3
2
83
99
96
92
84
67
HERCU
COMET
35CC
289
S4
2
20
23
23
22
.20
67
KERCU
KCNTR
40C0
390
A
2
673
8C1
778
729
679
67
KERCU
MONTR
40C0
39C
S3
2
5
6
6
5
5
67
KERCU
KOI.'TC
40 CC
39C
A
2
269
32C
311
295
271
67
HERCU
MONT C
AC CC
390
S3
2
2
2
2
2
2
67
KERCU
CCUGA
3500
289
A
2
2C61
2476
2406
2285
2C99
67
KERCU
COUGA
35CC
289
S3
2
16
19
19
18
16
67
KERCU
STAWA
C
rt
W
C
0
431
514
499
474
435
67
CLDSM
F-65
35C0
25 C
A
1
101
116
115
113
108
67
CLDSM
F-85
35CC
250
S3
1
3
4
4
4
3
67
CLDSM,
F—8 5
3500
25C
S4
1
c
6
6
6
6
67
CLDSM
F-85
3500
33C
A
2
1396
16C4
1593
1563
1497
67
CLCSM
F-85
3500
33C
S3
2
5C
57
57
56
54
67
CLDSM
F-85
35CC
330
S4
2
8C
93
92
90
86
67
CLOSH
F-85
35C0
33C
A
4
174
2C0
199
195
187
67
CLDSM
F-85
35 CC
33C
S3
4
6
7
7
7
6
67
OLCSM
F-85
35CC
33C
S4
4
1C
11
11
11
1C
67
CLDSM
F-85
35CC
400
A
4
7
8
e
8
8
67
CLDSM
F-85
35CC
4CC
S3
4
2
3
3
2
2
67
CLDSM
F-85
35 CC
40C
54
4
4
4
4
4
4
67
OLDSM
DELMC
45CC
33C
A
2
466
536
532
522
5C0
67
CLDSM
DELKG
45C0
425
A
2
466
536
532
522
5CC
67
CLDSM
DELTA
4SC0
425
A
2
722
831
£25
8C9
775
67
CLDSM
<58
4500
425
A
2
687
789
784
769
726
67
CLDSM
TORCN
45C0
425
A
2
1££
216
214
2 1C
2C1
67
CLDSM
STAWA
C
0
0
0
332
282
379
272
256
67
PLYKO
VAL1A
3CCC
17C
A
1
536
536
533
525
508
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LAECRATCPIE_S. INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, ALRCRA, CCLC.
318
-------
VR
P.AKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARE
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PRCJECTEC-MIO
72 73 74 75
67
PLYKO
VALIA
3C00
170
S3
1
168
168
167
165
159
67
67
PLYHO
PLYKC
VALIA
VALIA
3000
3OC0
273
273
A
S3
2
2
45
14
45
14
45
14
44
13
42
13
67
67
PLYKO
PLYKC
BELVE
6ELVE
35C0
3500
225
225
A
S3
1
1
257
4C
297
39
295
39
291
39
281
37
67
PLYKC
BELVE
35C0
225
S4
1
36
36
36
35
34
67
67
PLYKC
PLYKO
BELVE
EELVE
35C0
35C0
273
273
A
S3
2
2
731
se
73C
se
726
97
716
96
692
93
67
67
PLYKO
PLYMO
BELVE
BELVE
35C0
35 CC
273
44C
S4
A
2
4
69
15
E9
15
88
15
87
15
84
14
67
PLYKC
EELVE
35CC
44C
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
67
67
PLYMO
PLYMC
BELVE
FL'RY
35C0
4CC0
440
225
S4
A
4
1
1
116
1
116
1
115
1
114
1
11C
67
67
PLYMO
PLYKC
FliRY
FURY
4CCG
4G0C
225
318
S3
A
1
2
3
2361
3
2363
3
2351
3
2318
3
2241
67
PLYMO
FURY
40C0
318
S3
2
73
73
72
71
69
67
67
PLYKC
PLYKC
VIP
BASRA
4000
30CC
318
225
A -
A
2
1
It?
137
168
136
167
136
165
134
160
129
67
67
PLYKC
PLYMO
BAFRA
BARRA
3000
30CC
225
225
53
54
1
1
1$
16
18
16
18
16
16
16
17
15
67
PLYKC
BARRA
3000
273
A
2
343
343
341
336
325
67
67
PLYMO
PLYMO
BARRA
BARRA
3GGC
3CCC
273
273
53
54
2
2
46
41
46
41
45
41
45
41
43
• 39
67
PLYKO
STAKA
C
0
0
0
636
635
631
623
6C2
319
-------
VR MAKE MOOEL kEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARe REG ISTEREC PRCJECTED-MD
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
66 AMHCT
66 AKVCT
6ft AMMGT
66 AKKCT
66 Af.KCT
AMERI
AKERI
AMERI
CLASS
CLASS
30CC
3C-C0
3CCC
3500
35CC
66
A^CT
CLASS
3 5 CO
232
S4
1
12
12
12
11
1C
66
Af.rtCT
CLASS
35CC
287
A
2
19C
199
191
176
158
66
AVKCT
CLASS
35CC-
207
S3
2
56
61
59
55
49
66
AP.MGT
CLASS
35CC
237
S4
2
3
3
3
3
3
66
AfKCT
CLASS
35C0
327
A
2
69
93
69
e3
74
66 AKMCT
66 AMMCT
66 AKHCT
66 APMCT
66 APKCT
CLASS
CLASS
AMEAS
AKB AS
A KB AS
66 AKKCT
"66 AKKCT
_66AfKCT
66 AMMCT
66 APKCT
AHE AS
APBAS
APBAS
AMCAS
Af E AS
35CC
35C0
3 5 C C_
35CC
35CC
327
327
232
232
232
S3
27
28 27
25
23
S
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARfi
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-MID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
66
CAOIL
CALAI
5CCC
429
A
4
236
236
234
23C
225
66
CACIL
DEVIL
5CCC
429
A
4
1247
1235
1225
12C8
1180
66
CAOIL
FLEET
50CC
429
A
4
174
173
171
169
165
66
CACIL
cLDCR
5CCC
429
A
4
71
70
70
69
67
66
CHEVR
CCRVA
2750
164
A
242
337
328
312
2C6
66
CHEVR
CORVA
27EC
164
S3
2
96
95
92
87
80
66
CHEVR
CGflVA
2750
164
S4
155
157
153
145
133
66
CHEVR
CORVA
2750
164
A
4
146
144
14C
123
122
66
CHEVR
CCRVA
275C
164
S3
4
41
40
39
37
34
66
CHEVR
CCRVA
275C
164
S4
4
te
67
65
62
57
¦ 66
CHEVR
CHEV2
275C
153
A
1
25
25
24
23
21
66
CHEVR
CHEVZ
2750
153
S3
1
1C
10
10
9
8
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
27JC
153
S4
1
2
2
2
2
2
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
194
A
1
2ES
286
278
264
242
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
194
S3
1
120
119
116
11C
1C1
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3000
194
S4
1
27
26
26
24
22
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
30C0
230
A
1
289
286
278
264
242
66
CKEVR
CHEV2
3OC0
230
S3 , 1
120
119
116
11C
1C1
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3COO
23C
S4
1
27
26
26
24
22
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
283
A
2
136
134
131
124
114
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
283
S3
2
56
56
54
52
47
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
263
S4
2
12
12
12
11
10
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
327
A
4
82
£1
7S
75
. 69
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
30GC
327
S3
4
34
34
33
31
28
66
CHEVR
CHEV2
3GG0
327
S4
4
7
7
7
7
6
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
194
A
1
3EC
375
365
347
318
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
194
S3
1
ICC
98
96
91
83
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
194
S4
1
1C1
99
97
92
84
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
230
A
1
236
233
227
216
198
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
23C
S3
1
62
61
59
56
52
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
230
S4
1
62
62
60
57
52
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
283
A
2
1C38
1024
997
948
869
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
283
S3
2
273
269
262
249
228
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
283
S4
2
276
272
265
252
231
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
327
A
4
472
466
454
432
396
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
327
S3
¦ 4
124
122
119
113
1C4
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
327
S4
4
125
124
120
114
1C5
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
396
A
4
236
233
227
216
198
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
350C
396
S3
4
62
61
59
56
52
66
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
396
S4
4
62
62
60
57
52
66
CHEVR
BISCA
3 5 CO
2 5C
A
1
130
128
124
ne
108
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
25C
S3
1
19
18
18
17
16
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
25C
S4
1
a
3
3
2
2
66
CHEVR
615CA
35C0
2£3
A
2
435
429
418
397
364
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
283
S3
2
64
63
61
5G
53
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LAGCRA1CPIES» MC.
1S9CO E. CCLFAX AVEKUEt ACRCRA, CCLC.
321
-------
YR
HAKE
MOCEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
C
RE
REG1STEREC
PRGJECTEC-K1D
DISP
TYPE
T
PE
JULY 1971
72
73
7A
75
66
CHEVR
BISCA
350C
283
SA
1C
10
10
9
8
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
327
A
282
278
271
258
236
66
CHEVR
EISCA
35 CC
327
S3
A 1
A1
AC
38
3A
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
327
SA
6
6
6
6
5
66
ChEVR
BISCA
35CC
396
A
9
9
9
8
7
66
CHEVR
EISCA
35CC
396
S3
1
1
1
1
1
66
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
396
SA
C
C
0
C
0
66
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
25C
A
258
25A
2A7
235
216
66
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
25C
S3
3£
37
36
3A
31
66
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
25C
SA
6
6
6
5
•5
66CHEVP BELAI AOOO 283 A
66 CHEVR BELA1 ACCO 283 S3
66_ CHEVR ' BELM AC CO 283 SA
66 CHEVR BELAI AOOO ~327 A
66 CHEVR BELA1 ACCO 327 S3
66 CHEVR BELA 1 AOCO 327 SA
66 CHEVR BELAI" ACOO 396 A -
66^ CHEVR BELAI AOCC 396 S3
66 CHEVR BELAI AOCC 396 SA
66 CKEVR IMPAL 35C0 25C A
£6 2 852 e 2 9 76 9 72 3
127 125 122 116 1C6
_2_1 2C 20 19 17
56C 553 538 512 A69
62 81 79 75 69
13 13 13 1J 1J_
ie6 18A 179 17C 156
27 27 26 25 23
A A A A 3
£55 8AA 821 781 716
66
CHEVR
IKPAL
35CC
25C
S3
1
126
12A
121
115
1C5
66
CHEVR
IMPAL
35CC
25C
SA
1
21
2G
2C
19
17
66
CHEVR
IMPAL
35CC
283
A
2
2863
2826
275C
2615
2398
66
CHEVR
I f PAL
3500
283
S3
2
A 22
A17
A C-6
386
35A
66
CHEVR
IHFAL
3500
283
SA
2
7C
69
67
6 A
59
66
CHEVR
IMFAL
35CC
327
A
A
1E59
1835
1786
169 £
1557
66
CHEVR
IKPAL
35C0
327
S3
A
27A
271
263
25C
230
66
CHEVR
IMPAL
35C0
327
SA
A
A5
A5
A3
A1
38
66
CHEVR
IKPAL
35C0
396
A
A
619
611
595
566
519
66
CHEVR
IMPAL
35CC
396
S3
A
91
90
87
83
76
66
CHEVR
IMPAL
35C0
396
SA
A
15
15
1A
13
12
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
AOCC
283
A
2
379
37A
36A
3A6
318
66
CHEVR
CAP* I
ACCO
283
S3
2
56
55
53
51
A6
66 CHEVR CAPRI ACCO 283 SA 2 9 9 8 8 7
66 CHEVR CAPKI AOOO 327 A A 5C6 A99 A86 A62 A2A
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACCO
327
. S3
7A
73
71
68
62
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
AOOO
327
SA
12
12
11
11
1C
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACCO
396
A
253
2A9
2A3
231
212
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACCO
396
S3
37
36
35
3A
31
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACCO
396
SA
6
6
5
5
5
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACOO
A27
A
126
12A
121
115
1C6
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
AC CC
A27
S3
18
18
17
17
15
66
CHEVR
CAPRI
ACCC
A27
SA
3
3
2
2
2
66
CHEVR
CAKER
3500
23 G
A
67
66
65
61
56
66
CHEVR
CAfER
35CC
23C
S3
17
17
17
16
1A
AUTCMCTIVE
TESTING L
BCRATCPIES
, I *C .
1990C E
. COLFAX AVEN
E» AUKCRA t
CCLC.
322
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CAR6
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEO-fID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
66
CHEVR
CAMER
350C
230
S4
1
18
17
17
16
15
66
CHEVR
CAHER
350C
283
A
2
1S1
189
184
175
160
66
CHEVR
CAPER
35CC
283
S3
2
50
49
48
46
42
66
CHEVR
CAC.ER
35CC
283
S4
2
51
5C
49
46
42
66
CHEVR
CORVE
3£CO
327
A
4
16
16
15
14
13
66
CHEVR
CCFiVE
35CC
327
S3
4
3
3
3
3
3
66
CHEVR
CORVE
35CC
327
S4
4
166
164
159
152
139
66
CHEVR
CORVE
35C0
427
A
4
4
¦ 4
a
3
3
66
CHEVR
CORVE
35CC
427
S3
4
0
C
C
C
0
66
CHEVR
CCRVE
35C0
427
S4
4
41
41
3S
38
34
66
CHEVR
STAKA
C
0
0
0
2278
2248
2188
2081
1908
66
CHRYS
NEfcPG
40 CO
383
A
2
1764
176C
1749
1721
1658
66
CHRYS
NEK PC
4CCC
383
S3
2
7
7
7
6
6
66
CHRYS
30C
45CC
383
A
4
456
457
454
447
431
66
CHRYS
30C
45CG
383
S3
4
1
1
1
1
1
66
CHRYS
NEfcYO
45CC
44C
A
4
564
563
559
550
530
66
ChRYS
NEhYG
45C0
440
S2"
4
2
2
2
2
2
66
CHRYS
STAkA
C
C
C
224
223
222
218
210
66
CCDC-E
DART
3000
170
A
1
S7C
566
563
55C
520
66
CCDGE
DART
3CC0
170
S3
1
12e
128
127
124
117
66
CCXGE
DART
30C0
17C
S4
1
11
11
11
1C
1C
66
DODGE
DART
3CC0
225
A
1
503
502
497
485
459
66
CCDC-E
DART
3000
225
S3
1
113
113
112
1C9
¦ 103
66
CCDGE
DART
3CC0
22S
S4
1
10
10
9
9
9
66
DODGE
CART
3CCC
273
A
2
ICE
184
182
178
168
66
DCOGE
OART
3CC0
273
S3
2
41
41
41
40
38
66
CCDGE
DART
30C0
273
S4
2
3
3
3
3
3
66
DGDGE
CCRCN
35CC
225
A
1
352
352
349
341
322
66
CCDGE
CCRGN
35CC
225
S3
1
41
41
40
39
37
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
225
54
1
1C
10
10
9
9
66
DODGE
CORCN
35CC
273
A
1
573
572
567
553
523
66
CCDGE
CGRCN
35C0
273
S3
1
67
66
66
64
61
66
CODGE
CORCN
35CC
273
S4
1
16
16
16
15
14
66
DCDGE
CCRCN
3500
318
A
2
516
515
51C
498
470
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
3-18
S3
2
6C
60
5S
58
55
66
CCCGE
CCRCN
35CC
318
S4
2
14
14
14
14
13
66
DCDGE
CCRCN
3500
361
A
2
277
276
274
267
252
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
3500
361
S3
2
32
32
32
31
29
66
DGCGE
CCRCN
350C
361
S4
2
7
7
7
7
7.
66
DODGE
CCRCN
35CC
383
A
2
133
133
132
129
122
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
35CC
383
S3
2
15
15
15
15
14
66
CODGE
CORCN!
35CC
383
S4
2
3
3
3
3
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
426
A
4
57
57
56
55
52
66
DCDGE
CGRCN
35CC
426
S3
4
6
6
6
6
6
66
CCDGE
CCRCN
3£CC
426
S4
4
1
1
1
1
1
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LAECPATCR IESt INC.
19900 E. COLFAX AVENUE» AURCRA, CCLC.
323
-------
YR HAKE MOO EL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTERED PRCJECTED-PID
OISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
66
CODGE
MONAC
4CCC
383
A
2
253
252
250
244
231
66
CCDGE
KCMC
4000
3B3
S3
2
1
1
1
1
1
66
DCDC-E
HGNAC
40 CO
383
A
4
126
126
125
122
115
66
CCDGE
MONAC
4CCC
383
S3
4
C
C
0
0
0
66
CODGE
MONAC
4CC0
440
A
4
42
42
41
40
38
66
CCDGE
MCNAC
4CCC
440
S3
4
C
C
C
C
0
66
DOCGE
CKARG
4CC0
318
A
2
24 2
241
239
233
220
66
CODGE
CHARG
4CCC
318
S3
2
C
0
0
C
0
66
CCDGE
ChARG
40 OC
361
A
2
4C
40
39
36
36
66
DCDGE
CHARG
40CC
361
S3
2
C
C
0
C
0
66
DCDGE
CHARG
40C0
383
A
2
ICC
ICO
99
97
91
66
DCDGE
CHARG
4CC0
383
S3
2
C
c
C
C
0
66
DCDGE
CHAP.G
4C00
426
A
4
2C
2C
19
19
18
66
DODGE
CHARG
4CC0
426
S3
4
0
0
C
0
0
66
CCOGE
STAWA
G
0
C
0
£3C
828
821
801
757
66
FORD
FALCC
3CCC
17G
A
1
38
37
35
32
29
66
FCRD
FALCO
3CC0
17C
S3 -
1
32
31
3C
27
24
66
FCRD
FALCC
3CC0
2CC
A
1
36
35
34
31
27
66
FORO
FALCC
3CCC
20C
S3
1
3G
30
28
26
23
66
FCRD
FALCC
3CC0
289
A
2
656
642
6 15
569
5C2
66
FORD
FALCC
3CCC
289
S3
2
547
535
512
475
418
66
FCRD
FAIRL
3CCC
200
A
1
342
334
32C
297
262
66
FORD
FAIRL
3CCC
20C
S3
1
31
30
29
27
23
66
FCRD
FAIRL
3CC0
200
S4
1
77
75
72
67
59
66
FCRD
FAIRL
350C
28 9
A
2
859
840
804
745
657
66
FCRC
FAIRL
35C0
289
S3
2
78
76
73
67
59
66
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
289
S4
2
194
190
182
i6e
148
66
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
39C
A
2
6CC
587
562
521
459
66
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
39C
S3
2
54
53
£1
47
41
66
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
39C
S4
2
126
133
127
118
1C4
66
FORD
FAIRL
35CC
39C
A
4
2CC
195
187
173
153
66
FORD
FAIRL
35C0
390
S3
.4
18
17
17
15
13
66
FCRD
FAIRL
35C0
390
S4
4
45
44
42
3S
34
66
FCRD
CtSTO
3SCC
24C
A
1
228
223
213
198
174
66
FORD
CUSTO
35C0
2"4C
S3
1
25
25
24
22
19
66
FCRD
CUSTO
4GC0
289
A
2
1C51
1C28
985
912
EC4
66
FORD
CUSTO
4CCC
289
S3
2
118
115
11C
1C2
9C
66
FCRD
CUSTO
40CC
352
A
2
64C
625
599
555
469
66
FCRD
CUSTCi
40 CO
352
S3
2
71
7C
67
62
55
66
FORD
CUSTO
4CCC
390
A
2
17C
166
159
148
130
66
FCRD
CUSTC
4CC0
390
S3
2
19
18
17
16
14
66
FCRD
CUSTO
4 COC
427
A
4
21
2G
19
18
16
66
FCRC
CUSTC
4CC0
427
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
66
FCRC
CUSTC
4CCC
426
A
4
21
20
19
18
16
66
FCPD
CUSTO
40CC
428
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
AUTCMGTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR1ES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURORA, CCLC.
32U
-------
YR PAKE MODEL hEIGHT Ef>G. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PRCJECTEC-MID
D1SP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
66
FCRD
GALAX
4C00
240
A
1
477
466
447
414
365
66
66
FORO
FCRD
GALAX
GALAX
4000
4GCC
240
289
S3
A
1
2
53
2199
52
2151
5C
2C6C
46
19CE
41
1682
66
66
FORO
FCRD
GALAX
GALAX
4000
4CCG
289
352
S3
A
2
2
247
122e
241
13C9
231
1253
214
1161
189
1C24
66
FORD
GALAX
4CC0
352
£3
2
150
147
14C
13C
115
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
GALAX
GALAX
4CCG
4CCC
39C
3SC
A
S3
2
2
356
4C
349
39
334
37
3G9
34
273
30
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
GALAX
GALAX
40C0
4CCC
427
427
A
S3
4
4
44
5
43
4
41
4
38
4
34
3
66
FCRD
GALAX
4CC0
428
A
4
44
43
41
38
34
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
GALAX
LTC
4CCC
4CGC
428
24C
S3
A
4
i
5
1C4
4
1C1
4
97
4
9C
3
79
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
LTD
LTC
4CC0
4CCC
240
289
S3
A
1
2
11
4EC
11
465
10
449
1C
416
8
367
66
FCRD
LTC
40C0
289
S3
2
53
52
50
46
41
66
66
FCRD
FORO
LTC
LTD
4000
4GC0
352
352
A -
S3
2
2
292
32
32
273
30
253
28
223
25
66
66
FCRD
FORD
LTC
LTD
4CC0
4CC0
390
39C
A
S3
2
2
77
8
76
8
72
8
67
7
59
6
66
FCRD
LTD
4000
427
A
4
9
9
9
8
7
66
66
FCRD
FORD
LTD
LTD
4CCC
4CCC
427
428
S3
A
4
4
1
9
1
9
1
9
C
8
0
7
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
LTD
HUSTA
4CC0
35CC
428
200
S3
A
4
1
1
1549
1
1515
1
1451
C
1344
0
1185
66
FCRD
MUST A
35CC
20C
S3
1
742
726
695
644
568
66
66
FCRD
FCRD
HUSTA
HUSTA
35C0
35CC
2CC
289
S4
A
1
2
175
2166
171
2119
164
2C29
152
18EC
134
1657
66
66
FCRD"
FCRD
HUSTA
MliSTA
35CC
35CC
2B9
289
53
54
2
2
1C38
244
1015
239
972
229
SCI
212
794
187
66
FCRD
TB1FC
45GC
390
A
4
6S5
641
614
569
5C1
66
66
FORD
FCRD
TBIRC
S7AVA
450C
0
428
0
A
0
4
4
72
29C4
71
2841
68
2721
63
2520
55
2222
66
66
1MPER
IHPER
CRGfcN
LEEAR
55CC
55CC
440
440
A
A
4
4
167
22
162
21
158
21
151
20
139
18
66
LINCO
CONTI
55C0
462
A
4
573
565
549
522
483
66
66
HERCU
HERCU
CCMET
CGMET
35CC
35CC
200
2CC
A
S3
1
1
419
117
4C7
113
386
107
355
99
311
87
66
66
HERCU
HERCU
CCKET
COKET
35C0
35CC
200
2PS
S4
A
1
2
45
369
44
378
42
359
38
329
34
289
66
HERCU
CCHET
35CC
289
S3
2
ice
1C5
ICC
92
EC
66
66
HERCU
KERCU
COHET
CQfET
35CC
35GC
269
39C
S3
A
2
4
42
346
41
336
39
319
36
293
31
257
66
66
MERCll
KERCU
CCKET
CCCET
35CG
35C0
39C
39C
53
54
4
4
96
36
• 93
36
89
35
81
32
71
28
AUTGKOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCP1ES, INC.
199C0 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLC.
325
-------
YR MAKE MOCEL WEIGHT ENG^TRANS CARB PEGISTEPEC PRGJECTED-M1D
OISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
66 MERCU MONTR 45CC 390 _A 4 7_64 742 705 648 568
66 MERCU MONTR 4500 3 S C S3 4 14 13 12 11 10
66 KERCU MCMC 45CC 390 A 4 433 421 400 367 322
66 MERCU MCNTC 45C0 390 S3 4 7 7 7 6 5
66 KERCH STAWA C 0 C C 84£ e24 782 719 631
66
OLD SM
F-85
3SCC
25C
A
1
128
127
125
119
109
66
OLDSM
F—85
35CC
250
S3
1
6
6
6
5
5
66
OLDSM
F-E5
35CC
25C
S4
1
9
9
9
9
8
66
CLOSK
F-85
35CC
330 .
A
2
1C4C
1032
1C13
97C
886
66
GLDSM
F-E5
3£C0
33C
S3
2
51
51
50
4£
43
66
OLDSM
F-85
3500
33C
S4
2
78
77
76
73
66
66
CLDSM
F-e5
35CC
4CC
A
4
5CC
497
486
467
427
66
CLDSK
F-85
35CC
400
S3
4
24
24
24
23
21
66
OLDSM
F-E5
35CC
400
S4
4
37
37
36
35
32
66
CLDSM
JETST
40CC
33C
A
2
172
171
166
161
147
66
CLDSM
JETST
40CC
330
S3
2
0
0
C
0
0
66
CLDSM
JETST
4CCC
330
A -
4
74
73
72
69
63
66
CLDSM
JETST
4CCC
33 C
S3
4
0
0
0
0
0
66
CLDSM
DYNAM
45C0
425
A
4
740
735
. 721
69C
631
66
CLDSM
DYNAM
45C0
425
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
66
OLDSM
DELTA
4500
425
A
A
1C47
1C39
1C2C
976
692
66
CLDSM.
DELTA
4500
425
S3
4
3
3
3
2
2
66
CLDSM
ST #PF
450C
425
A
4
76
76
74
71
- 65
66
OLDSM
STARF
4 5 CO
425
S3
4
C ¦
0
0
C
0
66
OLDSM
98
45C0
425
A
4
836
830
815
7ec
713
66 CLDSM
TCRCf.
45C0
425
A
4
315
313
207
294
26S
66 OLDSM
STAkA
0
0
0
0
356
356
349
334
3C5
66 PLYKC
VALIA
30CC
170
A
1
435
433
427
413
3£4
66 PLYKC
VALIA
30CC
17 C
S3
1
159
158
156
151
14C
66 PLYKC
V ALIA
3000
225
A
1
340
328
332
322
3CC
66 PLYKC
VALIA
3CC0
225
S3
1
124
123
122
118
109
66 PLYKC
VALIA
3000
273
¦ A
2
74
74
73
7C
66
66 PLYKC
VALIA
3CC0
273
S3
2
27
27
26
25
24
66 PLYKC
BELVE
3500
225
A
1
335
333
329
316
296
66 PLYKO
BELVE
35CC
225
S3
1
59
59
£8
56
52
66 PLYKC
BELVE
3500
225
S4
1
19
19
19
18
17
66 PLYK.O
BELVE
35CC
318
A
2
460
• 4E8
451
436
406
66 PLYKO
BELVE
3500
3ie
S3
2
ei
El
79
77
71
66 PLYMC
BELVE
35CC
318
S4
2
27
27
26
25
24
66 PLYFC
EELVE
35C0
361
A
2
263
261
25t
249
232
66 PLYKO
BELVE
3500
361
S3
2
46
46
45
44
41
66 PLYKG
BELVE
35CC
361
S4
2
IE
IE
15
14
13
66 PLYKO
BELVE
35CC
383
A
2
131
130
129
124
116
66 PLYfC
BtLVE
35CC
383
S3
2
23
23
22
22
20
66 PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
2e3
S4
2
7
7
7
7
6
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR 1ES, INC.
199CC E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AbRCPA, CCIC.
326
-------
YR
HAKE
HOOEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
OISP
TRANS
TYPE
CAR 8
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
FRCJECTEC-MD
72 73 74 75
66
PLYMO
EELVf
3SCC
426
A
4
125
124
122
118
110
66
66
plymc
PLYMO
BELVE
EELVE
35CC
35 CC
426
42 £
53
54
4
4
22
7
21
7
21
7
2C
7
19
6
66
66
PLYM.C
PLYMO
FURY
FURY
40CC
400C
225
225
A
S3
1
1
166
12
165
12
163
12
158
12
147
11
66
PLYMC
FUPY
4CCC
225
S4
1
2
2
2
2
2
66
66
PLYHO
PLYMC
FURY
FURY
4CC0
4QCC
318
310
A
S3
2
2
1191
91
1185
9C
1168
es
1129
86
1C51
80
66
66
PLYMO
PLYMC
FURY
FURY
4GC0
4000
318.
383
54
A
2
4
2C
714
20
711
2C
7C1
19
677
18
631
66
PLYMO
FURY
4CCC
383
S3
4
54
54
53
51
48
66
66
PLYMO
PLYMC
FUPY
FL'RY
4000
4CCC
383
440
54
A
4
4
12
3C9
12
3C8
12
3C3
11
293
11
273
66
66
PLYMC
PLYM.C
FURY
FUPY
4CCC
4CCC
440
440
53
54
4
4
23
5
23
5
23
5
22
5
20
4
66
FLYMC
VIP
40CC
3ie
A
2
14
14
14
13
12
66
66
PLYMC
PLYMC
VIP
VIP
4CCC
4 Li CO
383
44C
A -
A
4
4
115
57
114
57
112
56
1C9
54
1C1
¦ 50
66
66
PLYMC
PLYMC
BAPRA
BAPRA
3CCC
30CC-
17C
17C
A
S3
1
1
24
3
23
3
23
3
22
3
21
3
66
PLYMC
BARRA
3000
17C
S4
1
4
4
4
4
4
66
66
PLYMO
PLYMC
BARRA
BAPRA
30CC
3CCC
225
225
A
S3
1
1
45
6
45
6
45
6
43
6
40
5
66
66
PLYMO
PLYMC
BAPRA
BAPRA
30 CC
35C0
225
273
S4
A
1
2
9
17C
9
169
9
167
8
161
8
150
66
PLYMC
BARRA
35CC
273
S3
2
24
24
24
23
21
66
66
PLYMC
PLYMC
BAPRA
STAWA
35CC
0
273
0
S4
C-
2
0
34
798
33
794
32
783
32
757
30
7C4
66
66
PONT I
FCNTI
TEMPE
TEMFE
35CC
3500
230
23C
A
S3
1
1
565
S6
558
95
543
92
517
ee
476
81
66
PCNTI
TEMPE
35 CC
23C
S4
1
14£
146
142
135
124
66
66
PCNTI
PCNTI
TEMPE
TEMPE
35CC-
3ecc
326
326
A
S3
2
2
167C
2E4
1647
2EC
16C3
273
1526
26C
1406
239
66
66
PCNTI
PONTI
TEMPE
CA1AL
35C0
4CC0
326
389
S4
A
2
2
438
19C2
432
1876
42C
1825
40C
1738
368
1601
66
PCNTI
CATAL
4CC0
389
S3
2
21
21
20
19
17
66
66
PCNTI
FCNTI
STARC
ST/PC
45CC
45CC
389
365
A
S3
2
2
394
7
389
7
379
7
360
6
332
6
66
66
PC-MI
PCNTI
BCNNE
BCNNE
45CC
45 CC
389
389
A
S3
4
4
1C96
21
ICS 1
20
1C52
20
1CC1
19
922
17
66
PCNTI
GRAKP
45CC
389
A
4
354
349
34C
324
296
«o
-------
VR MAKE HOCEL WEIGHT ENG. TRAKS.CARE REG1STEREC PRCJECTED-KID
PISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 12 73 74 75
65 AMHOT AHEPI 3CCC 196 A 1 365 351 327 291 242
65 AKPCT A WEB r 3C CO 196 S3 1 155 US 139 123 1C2
65 APFCT AMERI 3CC0 232 __A 2 . 243 234 218 194 161
65 AMMCT AMERI 3CC0 232 S3 2 1C3 99 92 82 68
65 AHHCT CLASS 3CCC 199 A 1 39fc 38C 355 315 2t2
65
AC.K.CT
CLASS
3CC0
199
S3
1
i6e
161
15C
134
111
65
65
AMMGT
AKKCT
CLASS
CLASS
3CC0
3CC0
232
232
A
S3
2
2
26C
lie
269
114
251
106
223
94
185
78
65
65
AMMOT
APCCT
CLASS
CLASS
3CCC
3CCO
287
267
A
S3
2
2
164
6S
158
67
147
62
131
55
109
46
65
AMPOT
CLASS
3CCC
327
A
4
93
89
83
74
61
65
65
AP.KCT
AP.MCT
CLASS
AMeAS
30CO
35CC
327
232
S3
A
4
2
1
36
251
35
234
31
208
26
173
65
65
AKfcCT
APPCT
AMBAS
ArtBAS
35C0
33CC
232
287
S3
A
2
2
lie
63
1C6
61
99
56
ee
5C
73
42
65
AKKCT
AC.8AS
35CC
287
S3
2
26
25
24
21
17
65
65
AP.KCT
AKMCT
AM£AS
AMEAS
35CC
35CC
327
327
A "
S3
4
4
36
15
34
14
32
13
28
12
23
1C
65
65
AHKCT
APKCT
('A RL I
HAPLI
35CC
35 CC
327
327
A
S3
4
4
21
9
2C
8
IS
e
16
7
14
5
65
AMKCT
STAVA
0
0
C
0
766
736
687
611
5C8
65
65
euiCK
BUICK
SPEC I
SPECI
35C0
35 CC
225
225
A
S3
1
1
315
32
312
32
3 05
31
2SC
29
264
27
65
65
BU1CK
BUICK
SPEC I
SPECI
35CC
35 CC
3C0
300
A
S3'
2
2
941
96
932
95
SIC
93
866
EE
788
6C
65
BUICK
LESAB
35CC
3CC
A
2
1147
1136
111C
10 57
S61
65
65
BUICK
EUICK
LESAI3
NILCC
35C0
45CC
300
401
S3
A
2
4
5
551
5
55C
5
53e
C
512
4
466
65
65
BUICK
QUICK
WILCC
VilLCC
45CC
4£00
4CI
425
S3
A
4
4
2
185
2
183
2
179
2
170
2
155
65
EUICK
kILCC
45C0
425
S3
4
C
C
C
0
0
65
65
EUICK
EUICK
ELECT
ELECT
45CC
45CC
401
401
A
S3
4
4
514
2
5C9
2
497
2
473
2
431
2
65
65
EUICK
EUICK
ELECT
ELECT
45CC
45C0
425
425
A
S3
4
4
171
C
169
0
165
0
157
C
143
0
65
BUICK
RIVIE
45 CC
401
A
4
215
213
208
198
180
65
EUICK
RIVIE
45CC
401
S3
4
1
1
1
C
C
65
BUICK
RIVIE
45C0
425
A
4
71
71
69
66
60
65
EUICK
RIVIE
45C0
425
S3
4
C
C
C
0
C
65
BUICK
STAkA
C
0
C
0
Q37
334
326
310
282
65
CACIL
CALAI
50CC
429
A
4
291
2 86
284
27e
268
65
CADIL
DEVJL
5CCC
424
A
4
1140
1131
1115
1089
1049
65
CACIL
FLEET
5GC0
429
A
4
210
2C8
205
2CC
193
65
CHE VR
COP.VA
27 5 C
164
A
2
liec
1149
1093
1C02
870
65
CKEVR
CCKVA
2750
164
S3
2
295
267
273
251
218
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCRIES» UJC.
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURORA, CCLC.
328
-------
VR
HAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEC-C.ID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
CHEVR
COPVA
275C
164
S4
747
727
691
634
55C
65
CHEVR
CORVA
275C
164
A
A
353
383
364
334
290
65
CHEVR
CORVA
275C
164
S3
4
9£
95
91
83
72
65
CHEVR
COPVA
275C
164
S4
4
249
242
23C
211
183
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
30C0
194
A
1
4(6
473
45C
413
358
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
194
S3
229
223
212
194
169
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
3GC0
194
S4
11
11
1C
9
8
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
23C
A
419
4C8
388
356
309
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
23C
S3
1
I'.l
192
182
167
145
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
30C0
23C
S4
1
1C
9
9
8
7
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
327
A
142
138
132
121
1C5
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
327
S3
4
67
65
62
57
49
65
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
327
S4
4
3
3
3
2
2
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CC0
194
A
1
594
578
55C
5C4
438
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CCC
194
S3
1
157
192
183
167
145
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CCC
194
S4
1
?C
88
84
77
67
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CC0
230
A
1
534
520
495
453
394
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CCC
230
S3
1
178
173
164
151
131
65
CHEVR
CHEVE
3C0C
23C
S4
1
61
79
75
69
60
65
CKEVR
CHEVE
30C0
283
A
2
1247
1214
1155
1C59
92C
65_CHEVR CHEVE _30CC 283 S3 2 ^415 4C4 384 352 3C6
65 CKEVR CHEVE 3000 283 S4 2 1«C 185 176 142 14C
±5 CKEVR CHEVE 3CCC 327 A 4 EJ4 576 550 5C4 436
65 CKEVR CHEVE '3000 327 S3 4 197 1S2 163 167 145
65 CHEVR CHEVE 3CC0 327 S4 4 _90 8e 84 77 67
65 CHEVR BISCA 3500 23C A 1 3C6 3CC 285 261 227
65 CHEVR BISCA 35CC 23C S3 1 55 £3 51 46 40
65_CHEVR BISCA 35CC 230 __ S4 1 14 13 13 12 1C
65CKEVR BISCA 35CC 283 ~ A 2 525 511 486 445 387
65 CHEVR BISCA 35C0 283 S3 2 S3 91 E6 79 69
65_CKE VRBISCA35CC 283 S4 __2 24 23 22. 20 J8_
65
CHEVR
BISCA
3500
327
A
4
5CC
4E6
462
424
368
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
327
S3
4
89
87
E2
75
65
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
327
54
4
23
22
21
19
17
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
396
A
4
25C
243
231
212
184
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
396
S3
4
44
43
41
37
32
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
396
S4
4
11
11
10
9
8
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
409
A
4
83
81
77
7C
61
65
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
4C9
S3
4
14
14
13
12
10
65
CHEVR
bisca
35CC
409
54
3
3
3
3
2
65
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
230
A
1
5E8
573
545
499
434
65
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
23C
S3
1C-5
1C2
97
89
77
65
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
230
S4
1
27
26
25
23
20
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
283
A
2
1CC2
976
92E
851
739
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4OC0
283
S3
2
179
174
166
152
132
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. Al'RCRA, CCLO.
329
-------
YR
HAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEC-FID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 19 71
72
73
74
75
65
CHE VR
BELAI
AC CC
283
S4
46
45
43
39
34
65
ChEVR
BELAI
4000
327
A
4
954
929
883
eic
7C4
65
CHEVR
liELAI
40CC
327
S3
4
17C
166
158
145
125
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
327
S4
4
44
43
41
37
32
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CGC
396
A
A
477
464
441
4C5
352
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
396
S3
4
85
83
79
72
62
65
CHEVR
liELAI
4C0C
396
54
4
22
21
20
16
16
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCG
409
A
159
154
147
135
117
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
4C9
S3
4
28
27
26
24
20
65
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
409
S4
4
7
7
6
6
5
65
CHEVR
IHPAL
3 5 CO
230
A
1
228
222
211
194
168
65
ChEVR
IKPAL
35C0
23C
S3
1
4C
2S
37
34
3C
65
CHEVR
IMPAL
35CC
23C
S4
1
1C
10
9
9
7
65
CHEVR
IKFAL
4GC0
283
A
2
369
379
36C
33C
287
65
CHEVR
IKFAL
4CCG
283
S3
2
69
67
64
59
51
65
CHEVR
IKFAL
4GC0
283
S4
2
18
17
16
15
13
65
ChEVR
IMFAL
4GC0
327
A
4
271
361
343
314
273
65
CHE VP.
IKPAL
40C0
327
S3
4
66
64
61
56
48
65
CHEVR
IKFAL
4CGG
327
S4
4
17
16
15
14
12
65
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
396
A
4
185
180
171
157
136
65
CHEVR
IKPAL
4CC0
396
S3
4
33
32
30
2e
24
65
CHEVR
I HPAL
4CCC
396
S4
4
8
8
7
7
6
65
CHEVR
IKFAL
4CCC
4CS
A
4
61
60
57
52
45
65
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
4C9
S3
4
11
1C
10
9
8
65
CHEVR
IKPAL
4CCG
409
S4
2
2
2
2
2
65
CHEVR
CAPRI
4CCC
396
A
537
523
497
456
396
65
CHEVR
CAPRI
4000
396
S3
4
121
118
112
102
89
65
CHEVR
CORVE
35CC
327
A
4
195
ISC
iei
166
144
65
CHEVR
COPVE
3 5 CO
327
S3
4
49
47
45
41
36
65
CHEVP
C G V E
35C0
327
S4
4
123
12C
114
1C5
91
65
CHEVR
STAVA
0
0
G
C
37G3
3604
3427
3143
2730
65
CHRYS
hiEKPG
45CC
383
A
2
1165
1158
114C
1C98
1C16
65
CHRYS
MEWPC
45CC
3e3
S3
2
8
8
8
7
7
65
CHRYS
30C
4 5 CO
383
A
4
320
318
313
3C2
279
65
CHRYS
BCC
45C0
363
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
65
CHRYS
KEKYC
45C0
413
A
4
485
482
475
457
423
65
CHRYS
NEWYC
45CC
413
S3
4
3
3
3
3
2
65
CHRYS
STAWA
0
0
0
146
145
142
136
128
65
DQCGE
DART
3CCC
170
A
1
4E5
480
469
443
393
65
COCGE
DART
3CC0
17C
S3
146
145
142
134
119
65
CODGE
DART
3C0C
17C
S4
1
2G
20
20
19
It
65
CCDGE
DART
3CCC
225
A
1
452
448
437
413
366
65
CCDGE
DART
30CC
225
S3
1
136
135
132
125
11C
65
CCDGE
DART
3CCC
225
S4
19
19
IE
17
15
65
DODGE
DART
3CC0
273
A
193
191
187
176
156
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCF,IES»_1KC_.
19900 E. CCL FAX AVENGE» AURORA, CCLC.
-------
YR
KAKE
HOD EL
WEIGHT
ENG.
Trans
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTEC-KID
DISP
type
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
CODGE
DART
3000
273
S3
2
58
58
56
53
47
65
DODGE
DART
3CCC
273
S4
2
e
8
8
7
6
65
DODGE
CCRCN
30C0
225
A
1
361
358
35G
330
293
65
DODGE
CORON
3CCC
225
S3
1
65
64
63
59
52
65
DODGE
CCRCN
35G0
273
A
2
37 C
367
358
338
3C0
65
CODGE
CORCN
35CC
273
S3
2
66
66
64
61
54
65
CCCGE
CCP.CN
35C0
31tJ
A
2
439
435
425
4C1
356
65
COCGE
CGRON
35CC
318
S3
2
79
78
76
72
64
65
DCDGE
CORCN
35GC
361.
A
2
219
217
212
2CC
178
65
DODGE
CORCN
35CC
361
S3
2
39
39
38
36
32
65
DCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
383
A
4
73
72
70
66
59
65
CGDGE
CCRCN
35CC
383
S3
4
13
13
12
12
10
65
DCDCE
PCL#R
40G0
383
A
2
364
361
352
2 a a
295
65
DCDGE
POLAR
4CC0
383
S3
2
7
6
6
6
5
65
CCDGE
POL#R
4000
413
A
4
218
216
211
199
177
65
DODGE
POLAR
4CC0
413
S3
4
4
4
4
3
3
65
CCDGE
PCLAR
40C0
426
A
4
14£
144
140
133
118
65
CCCGE
PCLAR
4CC0
426
S3
4
2
2
2
2
2
65
DCDGE
HON AC
45C0
383
A
2
166
167
163
154
136
65
DCDGE
MCMC
45C0
383
S3
2
2C
20
19
18
16
65
DCDGE
MONfC
4500
413
A
4
1C1
ICC
98
92
82
65
DCCGE
MONAC
4500
413
S3
¦ 4
1
1
1
1
.1
65
CCDGE
HCNiC
45C0
426
A
4
67
66
65
61
54
65
DCDGE
CCNAC
45C0
426
S3
- 4
1
1
1
1
1
65
DODGE
STAWA
G
G
0
0
733
727
7C9
670
594
65
FCRC
FALCC
2750
170
A
1
409
392
363
32C
263
65
FCRD
FALCC
275C
170
S3
1
285
273
253
223
183
65
FORD
FALCC
275G
170
S4
1
19
16
17
15
12
65
FORD
FALCC
30CG
200
A
1
392
376
348
307
252
65
FORD
FALCO
3C00
200
S3
I
274
2£2
243
214
176
65
FORD
FALCO
3CC0
20C
S4
1
18
17
16
14
11
65
FCRD
FALCC
3000
289
A
2
179
172
159
140
115
65
FCRD
FALCC
3CCC
289
S3
2
125
12C
111
96
ec
65
FORD
FALCC
3CCC
289
S4
2
£
8
7
6
5
65
FCRD
FAIFL
3CCC
2CC
A
1
477
457
424
373
3C7
65
FCRD
FAIRL
30G0
200
S3
1
176
169
156
138
113
65
FORD
FAIRL
3CCC
289
A
2
1C94
1047
970
855
7C3
65
FORD
FAIRL
3C0C
289
S3
2
4C4
387
359
316
260
65
FORD
CUSTO
35C0
240
t
1
291
279
258
227
187
65
FCRD
CUSTG
35G0
240
S3
1
40
38
35
31
26
65
FCRD
CUSTO
40C0
289
A
2
1174
1125
1C42
919
755
65
FCRD
CL'STO
4000
289
S3
2
163
156
144
127
1C-4
65
FCRD
CUSTO
4COO
352
A
2
399
382
354
312
256
65
FORD
CUSTO
4CC0
352
S3
2
55
53
49
43
35
65
FORD
CL'STO
4CCC
39C
A
4
352
337
312
275
226
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCPATCRIES, INC.
1990G E. CGLFAX AVENUE* ACRCRA, CCLC.
331
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-MID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
FCRD
CUSTO
40CC
390
S3
4
48
46
43
38
31
65
FORD
CUSTO
4CG0
427
A
4
131
126
116
102
84
65
FCRC
CL5TC
4000
427
S3
4
18
17
16
14
11
65
FCRC
GALAX
35C0
240
A
1
557
534
494
436
358
65
FCRD
GALAX
350C
24 C
S3
1
77
74
68
60
49
65
FORD
GALAX
4CCC
289
A
2
2248
2153
1995
1759
1445
65
FCRC
GALAX
4CC0
289
S3
2
312
299
277
244
2CG
15
FORO
GALAX
4CCC
352
A
2
764
732
678
598
491
65
FCRD
GALAX
4CC0
352
S3
2
ice
1C1
94
82
66
65
FCRD
GALAX
4CCC
390
A
4
674
646
596
527
433
65
FCRC
GALAX
4C0C
390
S3
4
93
E9
e3
72
60
65
FCRD
GALAX
400C
427
A
4
251
241
223
197
161
65
FORO
GALAX
4CCC
427
S3
4
34
33
31
27
22
65
FCRC
LTC
4000
24G
A
1
117
112
104
91
75
65
FCRD
LTD
4CC0
240
S3
1
16
15
14
12
1C
65
FCRC
LTC
4000
289
A
2
472
452
419
369
303
65
FCRC
LTD
4GCC
289
53
2
65
62
56
51
42
65
FCRD
LTC
4000
352
A
2
160
153
142
125
1C3
65
FCRD
LTD
4C0C
352
S3
2
22
21
19
17
14
65
FORD
LTC
4CC0
39C
A
4
141
135
125
110
91
65
FCRD
LTD
40 CO
390
S3
4
19
18
17
15
12
65
FORC
LTC
40CG
427
A
4
52
50
46
41
34
65
FCRD
LTD
40C0
427
S3
4
7
7
6
5'
4
65
FORD
FUSTA
30C0
2GC
A
1
1111
1C64
985
869
714
65
FCRC
FUSTA
30CC
20C
S3
1
661
633
5E6
517
425
65
FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
2CC
54
1
3CC
287
266
235
193
65
FCRD
MUSTA
3GC0
289
A
2
2C10
1925
1763
1572
1291
65
FCRD
MUSTA
3CCC
289
S3
2
1196
1145
1C61
935
768
65
FCRD
MUSTA
30CG
289
54
2
558
535
495
437
359
65
FCRD •
TBIRD
45CC
390
A
4
794
76C
705
621
510
65
FORD
STAhA
0
• 0
C
0
3031
2903
269C
2371
1948
65
IMPER
IMPER
550C
413
A
4
217
211
20 2
1£6
161
65
LINCO
CONTI
550C
4 3G
A
4
436
424
4C4
374
332
65
FERCU
CCKET
3000
20C
A
1
517
491
451
396
327
65
FERCU
COF.ET
3CCC
20C
S3
1
213
2C2
186
163
134
65
KERCU
COFET
3000
2C0
S4
1
59
56
51
45
37
65
KERCU
COFET
3CCC
289
A
2
491
466
428
376
31C
65
FERCU
CCKET
3GC0
289
S3
2
2C2
192
176
155
128
65
FERCU
CGKET
¦ 30 CO
289
S4
2
56
53
49
43
35
65
FERCU
MONTR
4C0C
39G
A
2
472
44E
412
361
298
65
FERCU
HCNTR
4CCC
390
S3
2
14
13
12
1C
8
65
MERCU
MCN'TR
400C
427
A
4
314
298
274
241
198
65
FERCU
HCNTR
4CCC
427
S3
4
c
8
8
7
5
65
FERCU
FONTC
40CG
390
A
2
273
260
239
209
173
65
MERCU
MONTC
4C0C
39C
S3
2
e
7
7
6
5
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCR IE_Sf_INC.
19900 E. CCLfAX AVENUE» ALRCRAt COLO.
332
-------
YR
MAKE
MOCEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARB
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEDrMID
DISP.
TYPE
TYPE
JLLY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
MERCU
HONTC
40CC
427
A
4
182
173
159
139
115
65
C.ERCU
MCNTC
4000
427
S3
4
5
5
4
4
3
65
MERCU
STAKA
C
C
C
0
74C
7C3
646
566
467
65
CLDSH
F-e5
35CC
225
A
1
122
119
114
104
88
65
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
225
S3
1
8
7
7
6
5
65
CLOSM
F-85
35C0
225
S4
1
11
10
10
9
8
65
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
33C
A
2
622
611
585
534
450
65
CLOSM
F-85
35C0
33C
S3
2
41
40
38
35
29
65
QLCSH
F-85
35CC
33C
S4
2
56
55
53
48
41
65
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
33C
A
4
376
369
353
323
271
65
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
33C
S3
4
24
24
23
21
17
65
CLOSM
F-85
35C0
33C
S4
4
34
33
32
29
24
65
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
400
A
4
124
122
117
1C6
90
65
CLDSH
F-65
35CC
400
S3
4
8
e
7
7
5
65
GLDSM
F-E5
35CC
40C
S4
4
11
n
10
9
8
65
CLCSH
JETST
4CC0
33C
A
4
465
456
437
399
336
65
CLCSM
JETST
4CCC
33C
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
65
CLDSH
DYN68
45G0
425
A
2
969
951
910
832
700
65
CLDSH
DYN88
45CC
425
S3
2
4
• 4
4
4
3
65
CLCSM
DEL88
45C0
425
A
2
798
763
750
6es
577
65
CLDSH
DEL88
45CC
425
S3
2
4
3
3
3
2
65
CLCSK
STAPF
4500
425
A
4
131
129
123
113
95
65
CLDSH
STARF
45C0
425
S3
4
C
0
C
0
0
65
CLDSH
98
4500
425
A
4
806
7S1
757
692
582
65
CLDSH
98
45C0
425
S3
4
4
3
3
3
2
65
CLCSK
STAk'A
C
0
0
C
381
374
358
327
275
65
PLYMO
VALIA
3CCC
170
A
1
376
370
356
333
290
65
PLYMO
VALIA
3CC0
17C
S3
1
159
157
152
141
123
65
PLYKC
VALIA
3CC0
225
A
1
266
262
253
236
205
65
PLYHO
VALIA
3CCC
225
S3
1
112
111
107
ICC
87
65
PLYMO
VALIA
3CCC
273
A
2
£6
84
82
76
66
65
PLYMO
VALIA
3CCC
273
S3
2
36
36
34
32
28
65
PLYMC
eELVE
35C0
225
A
1
374
369
357
332
288
65
PLYMO
BELVE
35CC
225
S3
1
104
1C3
99
93
£C
65
PLYHO
BELVE
35CC
225
S4
1
19
19
19
17
15
65
PLYKC
BELVE
35C0
273
A
2
171
169
163
152
132
65
PLYMO
DELVE
35C0
273
S3
2
48
47
45
42
37
65
PLYHO
EELVE
35CC
273
S4
2
9
9
8
8
7
65
PLYHC
EELVE
35C0
318
A
2
216
215
2C6
193
168
65
PLYMC
BELVE
35CC
318
S3
2
e
6
5
- 5
4
65
PLYHC
eELVE
350C
318
54
2
11
11
11
1C
8
65
PLYMC
BELVE
35CC
361
A
2
163
161
156
145
126
65
PLYMO
BELVE
3 5 CO
361
S3
2
45
45
43
4C
35
65
PLYKC
BELVE
35C'C
361
S4
2
e
8
8
7
6
65
PLYHO
eELVE
35CC
383
A
4
1C9
107
104
96
84
ACTCKCTIVE TESTING LABCMTCP 1ES» INC*
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE t AlPCRA, CCLC.
333
-------
YR
MAKE
MCCEL
WEIGhT
ENG.
TRANS
cabb
REC-ISTEREC
PRCJECTED-XID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
PLYKC
eELVE
35C0
383
S3
4
3C
3C
29
27
23
65
PLYKC
BELVE
35C0
383
54
4
5
5
5
K
4
65
PLYKC
BELVE
35C0
426
A
4
54
53
52
4£
42
65
PLYMC
BELVE
35CC
426
S3
4
15
15
14
13
11
65
PLYKC
BELVE
3 5 CC
426
54
4
2
2
2
2
2
65
PLYKC
FURY
4CC0
225
A
1
252
248
24C
223
194
65
PLYK.G
FURY
4000
225
S3
1
22
22
21
2 C
17
65
PLYKC
FURY
4C CC
225
S4
1
7
7
6
6
5 '
65
PLYMO
FURY
4GCC
318
A
2
1161
1145
1107
1030
896
65
PLYKC
FURY
4CC0
318
S3
2
IC5
1C3
IOC
93
61
65
PLYMO
FURY
4CGC
3ie
S4
2
33
33
32
3C
26
65
PLYMC
FURY
400C
383
A
2
7C6
696
673
627
545
65
PLYMO
FURY
4CCC
383
S3
2
64
63
61
56
49
65
PLYKC
FURY
4000
383
S4
2
20
,2C
19
IE
15
65
PLYKC
FURY
4G0C
426
A
4
235
232
224
209
181
65
PLYMC
FURY
40CC
426
S3
4
21
21
2C
16
16
65
PLYK.O
FUPV
40CC
426
S4
4
6
6
6
6
5
65
PLYKC
BARRA
. 3CC0
17C
A
1
78
76
74
69
¦ 60
65
PLYK.C
BARRA
3CC0
170
S3
1
14
14
13
12
11
65
PLYMO
BARRA
30CC
17 C
S4
1
22
21
21
IS
17
65
PLYMC
BARRA
3CC0
225
A
1
37
36
35
32
28
65
PLYMC
BARRA
3CCC
225
S3
1
6
o
6
6
5
65
PLYMC
BARRA
3CC0
225
S4
1
10
• 1C
10
9
8
65
PLYMO
BAPRA
3CCC
273
A
2
256
252
244
227
197
65
PLYKC
BARRA
3OC0
273
S3
2
47
46
44
41
36
65
PLYMC
SARRA
3CC0
273
S4
2
72
72
69
64
56
65
PLYKC
STAV.A
C
0
0
0
839
827
799
744
647
65
PCNTI
TEMPE
35CC
215
A
1
4C5
395
376
346
304
65
PONTI
TEMPE
35 CC
215
S3
1
71
69
66
61
53
65
PCNTI
TEKPE
3500
215
S4
1
111
108
1C3
95
83
65
PONTI
TEMPE
35CC
326
A
2
e34
ei2
773
712
626
65
PCNTI
TEK.PE
350C
326
S3
2
147
143
136
126
no
65
PCNTI
TEMPE
35CC
326
S4
2
229
222
212
195
171
65
PCNTI
TEKPE
3500
389
A
2
531
517
492
: 453
398
65
PCNTI
TEKPE
35CC
3B9
S3
2
94
91
87
6C
70
65
PCNTI
TEKPE
35C0
389
S4
2
145
141
135
124
109
65
PCNTI
CATAL
40C0
389
A
2
1398
136C
1295
1193
1048
65
PONTI
CATAL
40CC
389
S3
2
27
26
25
23
20
65
PCNTI
CATAL
43CC
389
S4
2
26
25
24
22
19
65
PCNTI
CATAL
4000
421
A
4
599
5E3
555
511
449
65
PCNTI
CATAL
40C0
421
S3
4
11
11
10
1C
8
65
FONT I
CATAL
4CCG
421
S4
4
11
1C
1C
9
3
65
PCNTI
ST ARC
4000
3S9
A
2
2C5
2CC
19C
175
154
65
PCNTI
STARC
4CC0
389
S3
2
4
3
3
3
3
65
PCNTI
STARC
4C0C
389
S4
2
3
3
3
3
2
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCFIES, IKC.
19900 E. COLFAX AVENUE, AliRCRA, CCLC.
334
-------
YR
KAKE
MOOEL
UEICHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTEREC
PROJECTED—MID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
65
PCNTI
STARC
4000
421
A
4
88
£5
81
75
66
65
PONTI
STARC
4CC0
421
S3
4
1
1
1
1
1
65
PCM I
STARC
4000
421
S4
4
1
1
1
1
1
65
PONTI
BCKNE
45CC
389
A
4
791
770
733
675
593
65
PGNTI
BCNNE
4500
389
S3
4
15
15
14
13
11
65
PONTI
BONNE
45CC
389
S4
4
14
14
13
12
11
65
PCNTI
ECNNE
45C0
421
A
4 "
339
33C
314
289
254
65
PONTI
BONNE
45CC
421
S3
4
6
6
6
5
5
65
PCNTI
BCNNE
4500
421
S4
4
6
6
5
c
4
65
PCNTI
GRAKP
45CC
389
A
4
330
321
306
282
247
65
PCNTI
GRANP
45C0
389
S3
4
t
6
6
c
4
65
PCNTI
GRANP
45C0
369
54
4
6
6
5
5
4
65
PCNTI
GRANP
4500
421
A
141
137
131
12C
1C6
65
PCNTI
GRANP
4 5 CO
421
S3
4
2
2
c
2
2
65
PONTI
GRANP
4500
421
54
4
2
2
2
2
1
65
PONTI
STAkA
0
0
0
0
538
524
499
459
404
335
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
FRCJECTED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY l'J71
72
73
74
75
64
8UICK
ELECT
45CC
401
A
4
891
859
811
746
662
64
BUICK
ELECT
4500
401
S3
4
7
.6
6
6
5
64
EUICK
ELECT
45 CC
425
A
4
£91
859
611
746
662
64
EUICK
ELECT
4500
425
S3
4
7
6
6
6
5
64
BUICK
RIVIE
45CC
425
A
4
934
900
851
782
694
64
BUICK
P I V IE
45C0
425
S3
4
7
7
6
6
5
64
BUICK
STAUA
C
f\
W
C
0
1029
992
938
862
765
64
CADIL
CALAI
50CC
429
A
4
92C
899
856
779
657
64
CADIL
DEVIL
50C0
429
A
4
2S46
2677
2 740
2493
21C i
64
CADIL
FLEET
50C0
429
A
4
460
449
428
389
326
64
ChEVR
CCRVA
2750
164
A
2
32
32
31
3C
28
64
CHEVR
CCRVA
275C
164
S3
2
9
9
9
8
a
64
CHEVR
CCFVA
2750
164
S4
2
27
27
26
25
24
64
CHEVR
CCRVA
275C
164
A
1
32
32
31
30
28
64
CHEVR
CCRVA
275C
164
S3
1
9
9
9
8
8
64
CHEVR
CCRVA
27 EC
164
S4
1
27
27
26
25
24
64
CHEVR
CH.EV2
3CCG
194
A
1
28
?7
27
26
24
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
194
S3
1
15
15
14
14
13
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
194
S4
1
0
0
C
0
0
64
CHEVR
CHt V2
3CCC
230
A
1
28
27
27
26
24
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
30C0
23C
S3
15
15
14
14
13
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CC0
23C
S4
C
0
0
C
0
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
30CC
283
A
2
e
8
£
7
7
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
3C0C
283
S3
2
4
4
4
4
4
64
CHEVR
CHEV2
3CCC
263
S4
2
C
0
0
0
0
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
30CC
194
A
1
26
26
25
24
23
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CCC
194
S3
1
10
10
10
9
9
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
30CC
194
S4
1
3
3
3
3
2
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CCC
23C
A
1
26
26
25
24
23
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CC0
230
S3
1
10
1C
S
9
9
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
3CC0
23C
S4
1
3
3
3
3
2
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
3500
283
A
2
79
77
76
73
69
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
35CC
283
S3
2
3C
30
29
28
26
64
CHEVR
CHEVE
35C0
283
S4
2
9
9
9
9
8
64
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
23C
A
1
19
19
19
18
17
64
CHEVR
BISCA
35G0
23C
S3
1
5
5
4
4
4
64
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
230
S4
1
1
1
1
0
0
64
CHEVR
BISCA
4CC0
283
A
2
29
39
38
37
34
64
CHEVR
BISCA
4CCC
283
S3
2
1C
1C
9
9
9
64
CHEVR
eisca
4000
283
S4
2
2
2
2
1
1
64
CHEVR
BISCA
4CCC
327
A
4
26
25
25
24
22
64
CHEVR
BISCA
40C0
327
S3
4
6
6
6
6
5
64
CHEVR
BISCA
4CCC
327
S4
4
1
1
1
1
1
64
CHEVR
BELAI
3500
23C
A
1
37
36
35
34
32
64
CHEVR
BELA1
35CC
230
S3
1
9
9
9
8
AUT0KCTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRIES » INC^
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AORCRA, CCLC.
336
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARB
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-M1D
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
. 74
75
64
CHEVR
BEL AI
35CC
23C
S4
1
1
1
1
1
64
CHEVR
BELAI
40C0
283
A
2
74
73
71
68
65
64
CKfcVR
BELAI
4CC0
283
S3
IS
19
16
17
16
64
CHEVR
BELAI
40 CO
283
S4
3
3
3
3
3
64
CHEVR
BELAI
4000
327
A
4
40
39
38
37
35
64
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
327
S3
4
10
10
10
9
9
64
CHEVR
BELAI
40C0
327
S4
4
2
2
2
1
1
64
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
40S
A
4
e
7
7
7
7
64
CHEVR
BELAI
4000
409
S3
4
2
2
2
1
1
64
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
409
S4
4
0
0
C
0
0
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
230
A
1
ICE
106
1C4
100
94
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4000
230
S3
I
28
27
27
26
24
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCt
23C
S4
1
5
5
5
5
5
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4C00
283
A
216
213
2ce
20C
189
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4GCC
283
S3
56
55
54
52
49
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CC0
283
S4
2
11
11
11
1C
10
64
CHEVR
1HPAL
4CCC
327
A
117
115
113
108
1C2
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
40C0
327
S3
4
3C
30
29
28
26
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
327
S4
4
6
6
6
5
5
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
40CC
409
¦ ¦ A
4
23
23
22
21
20
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
409
S3
4
6
6
5
5
5
64
CHEVR
IMPAL
4C0C
409
S4
4
1
1
1
1
1
64
CHEVR
CORVE
3500
327
A
4
7
6
6
6
6
64
CHEVR
CORVE
3500
327
S3
4
2
1
1
1
1
64
CHEVR
CCRVE
35C0
327
S4
4
c
E
&
5
5
64
CHEVR
STAWA
0
0
0
1C7
ie4
iec
172
164
64
CHRYS
NEhPO
4000
361
A
2
***~
****
•***
9831
9081
64
CHRYS
MENPC
4000
361
S3
2
164
154
148
139
128
64
CHRYS
3CC
4000
383
A
2
3234
3050
2919
2745
2539
64
CHRYS
30C
40CC
363
S3
2
45
43
41
39
36
64
CHRYS
30C
40CC
413
A
662
624
597
563
520
64
CHRYS
3CC
4CC0
413
S3
4
9
8
8
7
7
64
CKRYS
NEWYO
4500
413
A
4
446
42C
402
379
350
64
CHRYS
STAVA
0
C
0
1529
1442
13EC
130C
1201
64
DODGE
DART
30C0
17C
A
361
358
345
319
275
64
DGOC-E
DART
3CCC
17C
S3
1
128
127
122
113
97
64
DCOGE
DART
3000
170
S4
1
26
26
25
23
20
64
DCDGE
OART
30C0
273
. A
47
47
45
41
36
64
DCDGE
DART
3CCC
273
S3
2
16
16
16
14
12
64
DCDGE
OART
3G00
273
S4
2
¦a
3
1
3
2
64
CODGE
330
35C0
225
A
1
39
38
37
34
29
64
DCDGE
33C
3500
225
S3
6
6
5
5
4
64
CODGE
33C
35CC
225
54
1
1
1
0
0
0
64
DCOGE
33C
3SC0
318
A
2
78
78
75
69
60
64
DCDGE
330
35CC
318
S3
2
12
12
11
10
9
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES* INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AURCRA, CCIC.
337
-------
e J3C
E 330 .. .A
. IG17 33C
350C
B3
S4
2
J
0
v
C '
y" 33C
35CC
4i.',
J
4
i 5
15
13
\?.
. ¦.J3C
J5C(
?26
S3
4
-¦)
2
2
2
\
-.-t 33C
21
S4
f.
' C
G '
0
0
UCDCE 44C
3SCC
225
A
1
5R
£7
55
5 ¦
¦¦¦ i
64
COCGE 440
35CC
..'25 .
S3
1
9
e
e
r
b
64
crnGE 440
35CC
27*
S4
1
1
1
1
1
1
A 2 iW i; 6 1C4
53 2 18 16 It 16 > .
54 2 3 3 it _ 2 2
A 2 35 . 35 34 31 2i
bi 2 5 5 5 4 4
54 2 ' C C C C 0
A 4 23 23 22 20 17
5 3 4 3 3 3 3 2
54 4 0 0 C 0 0
A 1 is. 19 16 17 15
&4
DCDGE PCLAR
zi cc
JL? ¦
S3
I
3
3
2
2
2
'-4
CCDC-E
r' 1 AR
J5CC,
iZb
S4
1
C
0
0
0
0
64
DGCGF.
' 1 a R.
35 CC
:ia
A
2
40
39
38
35
30
64
DL 1" 1
1. L f R
3SCC
.-jib
32
2
6
6
c
5
4
64
PI UU
.'ll.AR
35CC
318
S4
2
1
1
C
0
C
64
cor,:.L-
< l.^n
3SCC
'¦i S3
A
2
12
12
11
10
9
64
C( >' •
n, 11) k
'J5GU
383
• S3
2
1
1
1
1
1
64
CLilU:
. ;.!.?/<
3 5 CC
383
• 54
2
0
0
c
c
0
64
DCDGE
iTUR
i 5C0
426
A
4
B
7
7
7
6
. OIlGf
'J0I. Aft
¦) see
426
S3
4
1
1
1
1
0
¦ f 1 < - P
PCL/iH
-.CO
4 26
S4
4
0
C
C
c
c
..;ioge
CORCN
35C0
273
A
2
11c
1C9
105
97
84
.4
o<.-E
CORCN
3500
27 3
S3
2
17
16
16
15
13
• ¦ ^ f., E
CORON
35G0
2 ?3
2
2
2
2
2
2
c:
-|80
4000
I ft'
¦ 2
32
32
31
29
25
l.-l L
-IMC
4CC>.
fc I
S J
2
C
0
0
0
0
¦'
t\tnj
4000
•it; i
'1
2
21
21
21
19
16
1 L,
-1c 1'
-3
2
C
0
0
0
0
' I->7
"680
4000
2
18
17
17
16
13
CS
..ciiLi
.t.,c6C
4CC0
383
S3
2
C
0
0
C
0 .
J4
^CDGE
MONfC
4000
383
A
4
£
8
7
7
6
64
CGCGE
MONAC
4CC0
383
S3
4
C
0
0
0
0
64
CCOGF
ST/V#
0
0
0
0
ie?
1E7
iec
167
144
64
FCRL)
1 ALCC.
2750
144
A
1
148
145
137
121
S5
V)
FORD
FALt.
27 5C
144
S3
1
115
112
106
94
74
¦" n,"r.TIVE TESTING LABORATORIES? INC.
i'ACO fc. CCLFAX AVENUE > AURORA, CCLC.
")GE 'i40_ j
• 0 a.;!'! 3
64_C(' • 3SLc
64 DCDrr- .^C 3 500 . u.i
: ¦-: s:cc ..3.1
64 LCDC-E 4Mi 3500 .«i!j
64 DCDGE 440 3500 426
64 DCDGE 440 35CC <-?6
64 DCOGE '44C' VS
64 DCDGE PCLIR JiiCi", >?5
338
-------
VR
KA KE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
C
RB
REGISTERED.
PRCJECTED-MID
DISP
TYPE
T
PE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
64
FORC
FALCC
2750
144
S4
18
17
16
14
11
64
FCRD
FALCC
275C
17C
A
55
54
51
45
35
64
FCRO
FALCO
27 SC
17C
S3
43 .
42
39
. 35
27
64
FCRD
FALCC
2750
17C
S4
6
6
6
5
4
64
FORO
FALCO
275C
20C
A
29
29
27
24
19
64
FCRC
FALCC
275C
20C
S3
23
22
21
ie
14
64
FCRD
FALCO
275C
20C
S4
3
3
3
2
2
64
FCRD
FAICC
30C0
260
A
63
61
58
51
4C
64
FCRD
FALCO
3CCC
26C .
S3
49
48
45
4C
31
64
FORD
FALCC
30C0
26C
S4
7
7
7
6
4
64 FORD FAIRL 3CCC 17C A_
64 FORD FAIRL 3CC0 17C S3
_6^ FORO FAIRL 3CCO 20C
64 FCRD FAIRL 30C0 200 S3"
64FCRD FA1RL 3CC0 260 A
JtL
32
36
17
1E4
66
62
55
43
31
29
26
2C
35
"33
29
23
16
15
13
1C
iec nc isc us
64 FCRD
64 FORD
64_ FCRD
64 FCRD
64 FCRC
FA1RL
FAIRL
FAIRL
CUSTO
CUSTC
3CC0
3CC0
3CCC
4CCC
40C0
2 6C
289
239
2C0
200
S3
A
S3_
A
S3
El
72
23
46
15
«L
7C
22
47
15
6C
66
21
44
14
_71_
58
_19_
39
12
_56_
46
IS
31
10
_64_FCRD
64 FCRD
64 FORD
"64 FCRD
64 FCRD
CUSTO
CUSTC
CUSTO
CUSTO
CUSTO
4CC0
40CG
4CCC
4000
4CC0
289
'289
352
352
39C
S3
A
S3
A
33
11
33
11
34
33 31
10
33
1C
33
1C
31
1C
31
27
9
27
9
27
21
7
21
7
22
64
FCRO
CUSTC
4CCC
390
S3
4
11
1C
1C
9
7
64
FORO
GALAX
4C00
289
A
2
- 549
536
506
449
353
64
FCRD
GALAX
4000
289
S3
2
91
89
84
74
58 ¦
64
FCRD
GALAX
4CC0
289
S4
2
34
33
31
28
22
64
FORD
GALAX
4CCC
352
A
2
329
321
304
269
212
64
FCRD
GALAX
4C0C
352
S3
2
54
53
50
44
35
64
FORO
GALAX
40CC
352
S4
2
2C
20
19
16
13
64
FCRD
GALAX
4CC0
39C
A
4
219
214
2C2
179
141
64
FCRD
GALAX
4CC0
390
S3
4
365
356
337
299
235
64
FORD
GALAX
4CC0
390
54
13
13
12
11
8
64
FCRD
MUSTA
3000
20C
A
1
82
80
76
67
53
64
FORD
MUSTA
3CCC
2CC
S3
1
53
51
48
43
34
64
FCRD
MUSTA
30C0
2C0
S4
1
32
31
29
26
2G
64
FORD
MUSTA
3CC0
289
A
2
225
219
207
184
145
64
FCRD
MUSTA
3000
289
S3
144
140
132
117
92
64
FCRO
MUSTA
3CC0
289
54
2
88
86
81
72
56
64
FORD
TBIRC
4500
390
A
4
21E
213
201
178
14C
64
FORD
STAKA
0
0
0
599
585
553
4 9C
386
64
IfPER
IMPER
55C0
413
A
4
»***
**4*
****
****
7929
64
LINCG
CONTI
55CC
430
A
4
281
265
243
211
168
AUTCMCTIVE TESTING L
1S90C E. COLFAX AVEIV
ECRATCRIES» INC.
E, AURCRA, CCLO.
339
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JL'LY - 1971
72
73
74
75
64
HERCU
COHET
3CCC
170 :
A
1
42
40
37
33
28
64
HERCU
CCHET
30CC
17C
S3
1
16
16
15
13
11
64
HERCU
COHET
3CCC
17C
S4
1
3
3
2
2
2
64
HERCU
CCHET
3CCC
200
A
1
37
36
33
3C
25
64
HERCU
COMET
3CC-C
200
S3
1
14
14
13
11
1C
64
HERCU
CCHET
3CCC .
20C
S4
1
2
2
2
2
1
64
HERCU
COMET
3CC0
26C
A
2
40
39
3fc
32
27
64
HERCU
CCHET
3CC0
26G
S3
2
16
15
14
12
10
64
HERCU
COHET
3000
26C
S4
2
2
2
2
2
2
64
HERCU
CCHET
3GCQ
289
A
2
3C
29
27
24
•20
64
HERCU
COHET
3CCC
289
S3
2
11
11
1C
9
' 8
64
HERCU
CCHET
30CO
289
S4
2
2
2
1
1
1
64
HERCU
MCNTR
45CC
39C
A
2
64
62
57
51
43
64
HERCU
MONTR
45C0
390
S3
2
3
3
3
2
2
64
HERCU
MONTE
45CC
39C
A
2
4G
' 38
36
32
27
64
HERCU
HCNTE
45C0
39C
S3
2
2
2
1
1
1
64
MERCU
STAhA
C
0
C
C
65
63
59
52
44
64
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
225
A
1
9C
82
72
6G
45
64
OLDSM
F-85
35CC
225
S3
1
11
10
8
7
5
64
CLDSH
F-85 .
35CC
225
S4
1.
4
4
¦a
. 3
2
64
OLDSM
F-85
35CC
33 C
A
2
342
315
276
228
173
64
CLDSM
F-65
3500
33C •
S3
2
42
38
34
28
21
64
OLDSM
F-85
35C0
33 C
S4
2
18
16
14
12
9
64
OLDSM
F-85
35C0
330
A
4
2G8
265
232
192
146
64
OLDSM
F-e£
35C0
33C
S3
4 .
35
32
28
23
ie.
64
CLDSH
F-85
35CC
33C
S4
4
15
14
12
1C
7
64
OLDSH
JETST
400C
33C
A
2
¦ 403
. 370
324
266
204
64
CLCSH
JETST
4C0C
33C
S3
2
2
2
1
1
1
64
OLOSM
DYNE 8
450C
394
A
2
934
858
753
621
473
64
CLDSH
DYN88
45C0
394
S3
2
5
s
4
3
2
64
CLDSH
SUP88
45CC
394
A
4
151
139
122
ICO
76
64
CLDSH
SUP88
45C0
394
S3
4
C ¦
0
C'
0
0
64
CLDSM
STARF
450C
394
A
4
85
78
6 8
56
43
64
OLDSH
STARF
45C0
394
S3
4
0
0
C
0
0
64
CLDSM
98
45C0
394
A .
• 4
369
339
298
246
167
64
CLDSH
98
45CC
394
S3
4
2
2
1
1
1
64
OLDSM
STAkA
C
C
0
0
233
214
188
155
118
64
PLYPC
VALIA
3CCC
17C
A
1
106C
1015
S27
78C
bll
64
PLY HO
VALIA
30 CO
17C
S3
1
443
424
367
326
239
64
PLYHC
VALIA
30CO .
17C
S4
1
1C7
1C3
94
79
58
64
PLYHG
VALIA
30CC
273
¦ A
2
232
222
203
171
125
64
PLYHC
VALIA
3C00
273
S3
2
S7
93
85
71
52
64
PLYHC
VAL IA
20CC
273
S4
2
23
22
2C
17
12
64
PLYHC
EELVE
3CC0
225
A
1
77
73
67
56
41
64
PLYHO
BELVE
3CCC
225
S3
1
16
15
14
11
8
AUTGHCTIVE TESTXSG^LAECR/JCR 1ES,_INC
19900 E. CC-LFAX AVENUE, ALRCRA, CCLG.
3U0
-------
YR
HAKE
"KGOEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTEO-KID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
64
PLYKC
EELVE
3000
225
S4
1
3
3
3
2
2
64
PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
31 &
A
2
S3
89
81
68
50
64
PLYKC
BELVE
3 SCO
318
S3
2
19
18
17
14
1C
64
PLYKO
BELVE
35CC
316
54
2
4
4
4
3
2
64
PlYKC
EELVE
3ECC
361
A
2
56
54
49
41
30
64
PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
361
S3
2
11
11
10
E
6
64
PLYKC
EELVE
35CC
361
S4
2
2
2
2
2
1
64
PLYKC
EELVE
350C
3e3
A
4
42
4C
37
31
23
64
PLYKC
BELVE
35CG
383
S3
4
8
8
7
C
4
64
PLYKO
eELVE
35CC
363
S4
4
2
2
1
1
1
64
PlYfC
BELVE
35CC
426
A
4
14
13
12
1C
7
64
PLYKG
BELVE
35CC
426
S3
4
2
2
2
2
1
64
PLYKC
BELVE
3500
426
54
4
0
0
C
C
C
64
PLYKC
SAVOY
35C0
225
A
131
126
115
97
71
64
PlYKC
SAVCY
35CC
225
S3
1
27
26
24
2C
14
64
PLYKC
SAVOY
35CC
225
S4
1
6
6
c
5
3
64
PLYKC
SAVOY
35CC
31E
A
2
lfct
153
14C
117
86
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
318
S3
2
33
32
29
24
18
64
FLYMC
SAVOY
350C
316
S4
2
6
7
7
6
4
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
35C0
361
A
2
97
93
es
71
52
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
361
S3
2
2C
19
17
15
11
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
3500
361
S4
2
5
4
. 4
3
2
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
3JCC
383
A
4
73
69
63
53
39
64
PLYKC
SAVGY
35 CO
383
S3
4
15
14
13
11
e
64
PLYKC
SAVOY
35C0
383
S4
4
3
3
3
2
2
64
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
426
A
4
24
23
21
17
13
64
PLYKC
SAVOY
3500
426
S3
4
5
4
4
3
2
64
PLYMO
SAVCY
35C0
426
S4
4
1
1
1
C
0
64
PLYMO
FURY
35CC
225
A
1
274
262
239
201
147
64
PLYKC
FURY
3500
225
S3
1
57
54
5C
42
30
64
PLYHC
FlIRY
35CC
225
S4
1
14
13
12
10
7
64
PLYKO
FURY
3500
316
A
2
332
318
291
244
179
64
PLYKC
FURY
35C0
318
S3
. 2
69
66
60
51
37
64
PLYMO
FURY
35C0
318
S4
2
17
16
15
12
9
64
PLYKC
FURY
35C0
383
A
• 4
151
145
132
111
81
64
PLYKC
FUF.Y
35CC
363
S3
4
31
3C
27
23
17
64
PLYKC
FURY
35CC
383
S4
4
7
7
6
5
4
64
PLYKC
FURY
35C0
426
A
4
50
48
44
37
27
64
PLYKC
FURY
35 CO
426
S3
4
10
10
9
7
5
64
PLYKO
FURY
35C0
426
S4
4
2
2
2
1
1
64
PLYKC
STAKA
0
0
C
0
661
633
578
486
357
64
PONTI
TEMPE
35C0
215
A
1
431
417
388
337
261
64
PCNTI
TEKPE
35C0
215
S3
1
98
95
89
77
59
64
PONTI
TEMPE
35CC
216
S4
1
E4
81
75
65
50
64
PCNTI
TEKPE
3500
326
A
2
39C
377
351
305
236
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRlESt INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRAt CCLC.
311
-------
VR MAKE MODEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PRGJECTEC-MIC
OISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
__66 80 7C 54
73 66 59 . 46
19 8_ 184 16C 124
45 42 36 28
38 36 31 24
969 9C2 764 6C7
42 39 34 26
323 3CC 261 2C2
14 13 11 8
156 145 126 98
64
PCNTI
STARC
4CCC
389
S3
2
7
6
6
5
4
64
PCNTI
STARC
40CC
421
A
4
54
52
48
42
32
64
PCN11
ST#RC
4CC0
421
S3
4
2
2
2
1
1
64
PCf> TI
BCNNE
4500
389
A
4
497
46C
447
389
3C1
64
PCM I
BCNNE
45GG
389
S3
4
21
21
19
17
13
64
PCNTI
ECNNE
45CC
421
A
4
165
160
149
129
100
64
PCM I
6CNNE
45C0
421
S3
4
7
7
6
5
4
64
PCNTI
GRANP
45CC
389
A
4
275
265
247
215
166
64
PCNTI
GRANP
450C
389
S3
4
12
11
1C
9
7
64
PCNTI
GRANP
45C0
421
A
4
91
ee
82
71
55
64
PCNTI
GRANP
45C0
421
S3
4
4
¦ 3
3
3
2
64
PCNTI
ST/WA
C
0
0
0
314
304
283
246
190
3U2
64
PCNTI
TEMPE
35CC
326
S3
2
89
64
PCNTI
TEKfE
35C0
326
S4
2
76
64
PONTI
TEKPE
35C0
3e9
A
4
2C5
64
PCNTI
TEKPE
35C0
389
S3
4
47
64
PCNTI
TEFPE
3 SCO
389
S4
4
40
64
PCNTI
CATAL
4C0G
3e9
A
2
1CC2
64
PONTI
CATAL
4000
389
S3
2
43
64
PCNTI
CATAL
4000
421
A
4
334
64
PCNTI
CATAL
4CC0
421
S3
4
14
64
PCNTI
STARC
4C-C0
389
A
2
162
-------
YR
MAKE
P.OCEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEO-MIO
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
. 74
75
63
AKHCT
AMEPI
300C
196
A
1
619
569
503
421
328
63
AMCT
AKEFI
3C0C
196
S3
1
567
521
461
386
3CC
63
AfKCT
CLASS
3CCC
196
A
1
164G
1514
123?
112C
873
63
AMHCT
CLASS
3COC
196
S3
1
1510
1386
1227
1026
800
63
APKCT
AMBAS
35CG
327
A
2
167
154
12t
114
88
63
AKHCT
AMBAS
35CC
327
S3
2
153
141
124
1C4
81
63
EUICK
SPEC I
3CCC
198
A
1
3S4
371
331
264
213
63
euick
SPECI
3CCC
198
S3
1
53
50
45
38
28
63
EUICK
SPEC I
300C
215
A
2
575
540
492
415
31C
63
euick
SPECI
3C0C
215
S3
2
72
68
62
52
39
63
EUICK
LESAB
4000
401
A
2
1326
1246
1134
956
715
63
euiCK
LESAB
4CCC
4C1
S3
2
12
12
11
9
7
63
euiCK
WILCC
4GCC
4C1
A
4
369
365
332
28C
209
63
BUCK
l» ILCC
4CCC
4C1
S3
4
3
3
3
2
2
63
euiCK
RIVIE
40CC
401
A
4
312
293
267
225
168
63
BUCK
RIVIE
40C0
401
S3
4
3
2
2
2
1
63
EUICK
ELECT
45C0
4C1
A
4
47E
449
409
345
257
63
euick
ELEC1
45CC
401
S3
4
4
4
4
3
2
63
BUICK
STANA
0
0
0
0
244
23C
2C9
176
132
63
CADIL
CAC1L
SOCO
390
A
4
14E6
1485
1484
1483
14£1
63
CHEVR
CORVA
275C
145
A
2
969
739
5C4
253
78
63
CHEVR
CORVA
2750
145
S3
2
128
98
66
33
10
63
CHEVR
CHEV2
2750
153
A
1
15
11
E
¦ 4
1
63
CHEVR
CHEV2
27EC
153
S3
1
8
6
4
2
0
63
CHEVR
CHEV2
275C
194
A
1
1545
1178
8C3
403
124
63
CHEVR
CHEV2
275C
191
S3
1
829
64C
436
219
67
63
CHEVR
B1SCA
35C0
236
A
1
372
282
193
97
30
63
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
236
S3
1
133
1C1
69
34
10
63
CHEVR
eiSCA
35CC
283
A
2
424
331
225
113
35
63
CHEVR
BISCA
3500
283
S3
2
155
lie
£1
4C
12
63
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
327
A
4
424
331
225
113
35
63
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
327
S3
4
155
118
81
4C
12
63
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
236
A
1
in
546
372
1E7
57
63
CHEVR
SELAI
4000
236
S3
1
257
196
133
67
20
63
CHEVR
BELAI
4CCC
283
A
2
£36
638
435
2ie
67
63
CHEVR
BELAI
40CC
283
S3
2
2CC
228
156
78
24
63
CHEVR
BELAI
4CC0
327
A
4
826
638
435
218
67
63
CHE VP
BELAI
4G00
327
S3
4
2C0
228
156
78
24
63
CHEVR
IHPAL
4CCC
236
A
1
1753
1337
911
456
141
63
CHEVR
IKPAL
4G0C
236
S3
1
628
479
327
164
50
63
CHEVR
IHPAL
4C0C
283
A
2
2C45
1560
1C63
534
165
63
CHEVR
If.PAL
40CC
283
S3
2
723
c 59
2ei
191
59
63
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
327
A
4
2C45
1560
1C63
534
165
63
CHEVR
IP.PAL
40 CO
327
S3
4
723
""559
281
191
59
63
CHEVR
CO*VE
3 SCO
327
A
4
42
. 32
22
11
3
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR 1ES» INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AURCRA. CCLG.
3U3
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
63
CHE VR
CORVE
35CC
327
S3
4
lfeS
-429
86
44
13
63
CHE VR
STAtiA
C
0
0
0
264]
2C14
1373
69C
213
63
CHRYS
NEWPO
AC CO
361
A
2
7C3
695
643
553
-421
63
CHRYS
NEWPO
4CC0
361
S3
2
28
28
26
22
17
63
CHRYS
3C0
4CCC
383
A
2
231
228
211
182
136
63
CHRYS
300
4CCC
383
S3
2
9
9
e
7
5
63
CHRYS
NEW YO
45C0
413
A
4
266
262
243
209
159
63
CHRYS
N'EViYC
45C0
413
S3
4
1C
1C
9
8
6
63
CHRYS
STAWA
0
0
0
0 .
98
97
89
77
58
63
DCCC-E
CART
30CC
17C
A
1
7 49
7C6
564
275
35
63
DCDGE
DART
30C0
17C
S3
1
321
3C2
241
lie
15
63
CCDGE
33C
35CC
225
A
1
125
118
94
46
5
63
DODGE
33C
35CC
225
S3
1
39
37
29
14
1
63
DOCGE
33C
35C0
318
A
2
22 e
225
179
87
11
63
CCDGE
33C
35CC
318
S3
2
74
7C
56
27
3
63
DCDGE
44C
35CC
225
A
1
91
e6
69
33
4
63
CCDGE
44C
35C0
225
S3
1
28
27
21
1C
1
63
CCDGE
44C
3500
318
A
2
174
164
131
64
8.
63
CCDGE
440
35 CC
318
S3
2
54
51
41
2C
. .2
63
CODGE
PCLAR
4CCC
225
A
1
79
74
59
29
3
63
CODGE
PCLAR
40 CC
225
S3
1
24
23
IE
9
1
63
CODGE
POLAR
40CC
318
A
2
169
159
127
62
7
63
CCDGE
POLAR
4CC0
318
S3
2
53
50
4G
19
2
63
DCCC-E
P0500
4000
383
A
2
55
52
42
2C
2
63
DCDGE
P05CC
40 CO
383
S3
2
11
10
E
4
0
63
CCDGE
880
4CC0
361
A
2
128
121
96
47
6
63
CCDGE
68G .
4000
361
S3
2
1
1
0
0
0 ,
63
DCDGE
CU68C
4COO
361
A
2
128
121
96
47
6
63
DCDGE
cueeo
4000
361
S3
2
1
1
0
• i 0
0
63
CCCGE
STAWA
C
0 .
0
0
343
324
258
126
16
63
FORD
FALCC
2750
144
A
1 .
1C7C
965
829
641
424
63
FCRD
FALCO
2750
144
S3
1
1C45
946
813
629
415
63
FORD
FALCC
275C
221
A
2
152
137
118
91
60
63
FCRD
FALCO
2750
221
S3
2
149
135
116
89
59
63
FORD .
FAIRL
3CCC
17C
A
1
423
3ei
328
253
167
63
FCRD
FAIRL
300C
17C
S3
1
246
222
19C
147
97
63
FORD
FA5C0
35C0
221
A
2
1179
1C63
914
7Q7
467
63
FCRD
FA5CG
35C0
221
S3
2
665
6ie
531
411
271
63
FORC
CUSTO
30GC
17 G
A
1
409
365
317
245
162
63
FORD
CUSTG
3CC0
17C
S3
1
238
214
184
142
94
63
FORC
CU5CC
3500 ,
221
,A
2
628
566
487
376
248
63
FORD
CU5CC
35C0
221
S3
2
365
329
283
219
144
63
FCRD
GALAX
35CC
223
A
1
20
18
15
12
8
63
FORD
GALAX
3500
223
S3
1
5
5
4
3
2
63
FCRD
GALAX
350C
26C
. A
2
3732
3366
2893
2238
1478
AUTOKCTIVE TESTING LAECP ATCP I ES_,_ INC
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AijRCRA, CCLC.
3UU
-------
VR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-MID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
63
FCRD
GALAX
3S00
26C
S3
2
1C52
949
816
631
417
63
FCRD
TBIRD
45C0
390
A
4
611
550
473
366
242
63
FORD
STAWA
C
C
C
0
2465
2223
1911
1479
976
63
IMPER
IMPER
5COO
413
A
4 ¦
171
i:e
137
ICS
76
63
LINCC
LINCC
55CC
430
A
4
337
295
262
221
174
63
KERCU
CCKET
275C
144
A
1
<69
532
439
334
230
63
MEPCU
CCKET
27 5 C
144
S3
1
371
295
243
165
127
63
KERCU
CCMET
2750
221
A
2
161
12e
ICS
CC
55
63
MERCU
COMET
2750
221
S3
2
89
71
58
44
30
63
MERCC
METEO
3500
170
A
1
2C
16
13
10
7
63
FERCU
METEC
35C0
17C
S3
1
5
4
a
2
1
63
HERCU
METEO
35CC
221
A
2
215
171
141
107
74
63
MERCU
METEO
35C0
221
S3
2
55
43
36
27
ie
63
KERCU
MONTR
45CG
39C
A
2
636
665
548
416
267
63
MERCU
KONTR
45C0
390
S3
2
29
23
19
14
1C
63
HERCU
MONTE
45CC
350
A
4
8C
64
52
40
27
63
KERCU
MCNTE
4500
390
S3
4
2
2
1
1
0
63
HERCU
STAWA
0
C
C
0
364
269
239
162
125
63
CLDSM
F-85
30C0
215
A
2
647
724
427
9C
1
63
CLOSH
F-85
3CCC
215
S3
2
l'C9
93
54
11
0
63
CLDSM
JETST
4C00
330
A
4
144
123
72
15
0
63
OLDSH
JET ST
4GC0
330
S3
4
18
15
9
1
0
63
CLDSf
DYN88
4500
394
A
2
1489
1273
750
159
2
63
CLDSM
DYN88
45 CC
394
S3
2
7
6
3
0
c
63
CLDSM
SUP88
45C0
394
A
4
453
3e7
228
46
0
63
CLDSM
SUP88
45CC
394
S3
4
2
1
1
0
0
63
CLDSM
STARF
45C0
394
A
4
2CC
171
101
21
0
63
CLDJM
STARF
45C0
394
S3
4
1
0
0
0
0
63
CLDSM
98
4500
394
A
4
576
492
29C
61
0
63
CLDSM
98
4500
394
S3
4
2
2
1
0
0
63
CLDSM
STAWA
0
0
0
0
234
20C
lie
25
0
63
PLYKO
VAL1A
30C0
170
A
1
915
830
722
559
358
63
PLYKO
VALIA
3000
170
S3
1
514
467
4C6
314
201
63
PLYPG
SAVCY
3500
225
A
1
154
140
122
94
60
63
PLYNG
SAVOY
35C0
225
S3 •
1
48
44
38
29
19
63
PLYKC
SAVOY
35C0
318
A
2
293
266
231
179
115
63
PLYMO
SAVOY
35CC
318
S3
2
92
83
72
56
36
63
PLYNO
BELVE
35C0
225
A
1
156
142
123
95
61
63
PLYKO
BELVE
35CC
225
S3
1
49
44
3e
30
19
63
PLY MO
BELVE
35C0
318
A
2
297
269
234
181
116
63
PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
318
S3
2
93
64
73
57
36
63
PLYPC
FURY
35CC
225
A
1
ie8
171
148
115
73
63
PLYf'C
FURY
35C0
225
S3
1
59
53
46
36
23
63
PLYfO
FURY
35C0
318
A
2
358
325
282
216
140
63
PLYMO
FURY
35C0
318
S3
2
112
1C2
88
68
44
AL'TCKCTIVE TESTING LAGCRATCR1ES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE« ACRCPA, CCLG.
3U5
-------
YR MAKE MODEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTERED PROJECTED-KID
OISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
63
PLYVO
ST AWA
0
0
0
0
487
443
365
29e
191
63
PCNTI
TEMFE
3C0C
194
A
1
479
455
427
394
359
63
PCKTI
TEPPE
3GGC
194
S3
1
171
163
153
141
128
63
PONTI
TfcMFE
30CC
326
A
2
296
281
263
244
221
63
PONTI
TEMPE
3CCO
326
S3
2
1£6
100
94
87
79
63
PCNTI
CATAL
40CC
389
A
2
1644
1562
1465
1354
123 2
63
PONTI
CATAL
4CCC
389
S3
2
86
82
77
71
64
63
PCNTI
ST ARC
4CCC
389
A
2
315
300
281
26C
236
63
PONTI
STARC
40C0
389
S3
2
16
15
14
13
12
63
PCNTI
ROME
450C
389
A .
4
836
795
745
689
627
63
PCNTI
BONNE
45CC
389
S3
4
44
41
39
36
33
63
PCNTI
GKANP
45C0
389
A
4
567
539
5C5
467
425
63
PCNTI
GRANP
45G0
389
S3
4
29
26
26
24
22
63
PCNTI
STAhA
0
C
C
0
351
333
312
289
263
3U6
-------
VR
Make
MODEL
HEIGHT
"ENG.
TRANS"
"care"
REGISTERED
PPCJECTED-HIO
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
62
AKKCT
AMERI
30C0
196
A
1
531
167
23
0
0
62
AHHCT
AMERI
3CCC
196
A
1
454
143
19
C
0
62
AffCT
CLASS
30CC
196
A
1
1269
4CC
55
C
0
62
AKHCT
CLASS
3CCC
19fc
S3
1
ices
3"42
47
C
0
62
AKHCT
AMEAS
35CC
327
A
2
161
5C
7
0
0
62
AMNCT
AHEAS
35C0
327
S3
2
137
43
t
c
0
62
BUICK
SPECI
3OC0
198
A
1
615
53C
383
192
48
62
BUICK
SPEC I
3CCC
198
S3
1
56
82
59
3C
7
62
euicK
SPECI
30CC
215
A
1
431
371
268
135
34
62
8UICK
SPECI
30CO
215
S3
1
67
57
41
21
5
62
BUICK
LESAE
45CC
401
A
¦2
1191
1C25
742
373
94
62
euicK
INVIC
45C0
401
A
4
353
303
22C
11C
27
62
EUICK
PIVIE
45G0
401
A
4
75
65
47
23
5
62
BUICK
ELECT
45C0
401
A
4
523
45C
326
163
41
62
euicK
STfcfcA
G
C
C
C
283
244
176
88
22
62
CADIL
CACIL
50CC
390
A
4
1536
1443
1363
1255
1116
62
CKEVR
CORVA
275C
145
A -
2
114C
283
33
C
0
62
CHE VR
CCRVA
275C
145
S3
2
1235
307
36
C
0
62
CKEVR
CHEV2
275C
153
A
1
ice
26
3
C
0
62
CKEVR
CHEV2
2750
153
S3
1
71
17
2
C
G
62
CHEVR
CHEV2
275C
194
A
1
1349
335
39
c
0
62
CKEVR
CKEV2
2750
194
S3
1
SG3
224
26
c
0
62
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
236
A
1
375
93
11
0
C
62
CKEVR
BISCA
35CC
236
S3
1
141
35
4
0
0
62
CHEVR
BISCA
35C0
283
A
2
7CC
174
2C
0
0
62
CKEVR
BISCA
35CC
282
S3
2
264
65
7
c
0
62
CKEVR
BELAI
4000
236
A
1
7(6
195
23
C
0
62
CKEVR
BELAI
40CC
236
S3
1
296
73
8
c
0
62
CKEVR
BELAI
4CC0
283
A
2
1467
364
43
0
0
62
CKEVR
BELAI
4GGG
283
S3
2
552
137
16
0
c
62
CHEVR
IMPAL
4CCC
236
A
1
1593
396
47
0
0
62
CKEVR
IHPAL
4000
236
S3
1
ttl
149
17
0
' 0
62
CKEVR
IMPAL
4CCG
263
A
2
2971
738
87
1
0
62
CKEVR
IKPAL
40C0
263
S3
2
1121
278
33
c
0
62
CHE VP
CORVE
35CC
327
A
4
66
16
1
G
0
62
CKEVR
CCRVE
35C0
327
S3
4
66
¦ 16
1
¦ G
0
62
CHEVR
STAVA
C
C
0
0
2375
590
7C
0
0
62
CHRYS
NEV.PC
4GCC
361
A
2
735
514
188
12
0
62
CKRYS
KEKPG
40 CC
361
S3
2 •
IE
13
4
0
0
62
CKRVS
3CC
4CCC
383
A
4
227
159
58
3
0
62
CKRYS
3CC
4C00
3ea
S3
4
5
4
1
C
0
62
CHRYS
NEK YO
45C0
413
A
4
2C4
143
52
3
0
62
CHRYS
NEW YC
45 CO
413
S3
4
5
3
1
0
0
62
CHRYS
STAWA
0
C
0
C
85
59
21
1
0
62
CCOGE
LANCE
30CC
17C
A
1
251
£9
18
C
C
AUTGHCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCB IES, IK.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE. AURCRA, CCLC.
3k7
-------
VR
HAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS C
Re
REGISTERED
PPOJECTEC-MIC
DISP
TYPE T
PE
JULY 1571
72
73
74
75
62
DCDGE
LANCE
3000
17C
S3
132
47
5
C
0
62
CCDCE
DART
35CC
225
A
2CC
71
14
C
0
62
DGDGE
DART
35CC
225
S3
43
15
3
0
0
62
DODGE
DART
35CC
318
A
358
128
26
1
c
62
DODGE
DART
35CC
318
S3
77
27
5
C
c
62
DCCGE
POLAR
35CC
361
A
ice
38
8
C
0
62
DCDGE
POLAR
35C0
361
S3
23
8
1
C
c
62
DCDGE
POLAR
35CC
3 63
A
126
45
5
C
c
62
DCDGE
POLAR
35C0
383
S3
27
9
c
C
0
62
DGCGE
POLAR
35C0
413
A
126
45
9
C
0
62
DCDGE
POLAR
35CC
413
S3
27
5
2
C
0
62
COOGE
STAhA
C
0
0
377
134
27
1
0
62
FCRC
FALCC
275C
144
A
1119
4C7
67
3
0
62
FORD
FALCO
275C
144
S3
1049
382
82
3
0
62
FORD
FAIRL
3OC0
17C
A
61S
225
4£
2
0
62
FORD
FAIRL
3CC0
17C
S3
441
160
34
1
0
62
FORD
FAIRL
3CC0
226
A "
1C45
382
E2
3
0
62
FORD
FAIRL
3000
2 2t
S3
747
272
56
2
0
62
FCRD
GALAX
4C00
223
A
556
202
43
1
0
62
FCRC
GALAX
4CC0
223
S3
156
57
12
0
0
62
FCRD
GALAX
4000
292
A
33C7
12 C 3
25E
11
0
62
FCRD
GALAX
4000
292
S3
932
339
72
3
0
62
FCPC
TBIRD
45CC
390
A
651
237
5C
2
c
62
FORD
STAV.A
c
0
0
2181
753
17C
7
0
62
IKPER
IMPER
5CCC
413
A
159
124
55
65
40
62
LINCO
LINCO
5CCC
43C
A
271
312
263
2C7
149
62
MERCU
CCKET
275G
144
A
7 2t
62C
467
282
120
62
MERCU
COMET
27£C
144
S3
35t
338
254
154
66
62
MERCU
METEC
3CCC
170
A
58
84
63
36
16
62
MERCU
METEO
3CCC
17C
S3
34
29
22
13
5
62
MERCU
METEC
30CC
221
A
403
344
259
156
67
62
MERCU
METEO
3CCC
221
S3
141
121
91
55
23
62
MERCU
MCN1R
4000
223
A
13
11
8
E
2
62
MERCU
MONTR
40C0
223
S3
C
0
C
0
0
62
MERCU
MONTR
4000
292
A
767
655
453
258
127
62
MERCU
MONTR
4C0G
292
S3
36
31
23
14
6
62
MERCU
STAta A
0
0
0
323
276
2C8
125
53
62
CLDSM
F-85
3CCC
215
A
643
587
449
278
123
62
CLDSM
F-85
3000
215
S3
77
71
54
33
14
62
CLDSM
DYNES
45CG
394
A
1435
131C
1C01
621
275
62
CLDSK
DYN88
4500
394
S3
7
6
5
•a
1
62
CLDSM
SCPE8
45CC
394
A
451
412
315
155
86
62
CLDSM
SUP68
45CC
394
S3
2
2
1
C
0
62
CLDSM
STARF
43C0
394
A
324
295
2 26
14C
62
62
CLDSK
STARF
450C
394
S3
1
1
1
C
C
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LABORATORIES,,INC.
199CC E. COLFAX AVENUE. AURORA• CCLC.
3 U8
-------
VR
PAKE
HOOEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARB
TYPE
RECISTEREC
JULY 1971
PRCJECTED-MID
72 73 74 75
62
CLDSH
98
4500
394
A
4
541
493
377
234
1C4
62
62
CLOSK
PLYKC
STAfcA
VALIA
C
30C0
C
17C
0
A
0
1
215
5C1
196
154
150
2C
93
0
41
C
62
62
PLYWCi
PLYMC
VALIA
SAVCY
3CCC
35C0
17C
225
S3
A
1
1
37C
ite
98
44
13
6
c
c
0
0
62
PLYHO
SAVCY
35CC
225
S3
1
58
15
2
c
0
62
62
PLYKC
PLYK.O
SAVOY
SAVOY
35CG
35C0
318
318
A
S3
2
2
2 3C
79
61
21
8
2
c
c
G
0
62
62
PLYKC
PLYKC
eELVE
BELVE
35CO
35CC
225
225
A
S3
1
1
ICt
36
28
9
3
1
c
c
0
0
62
PLYKC
BELVE
3500
318
A
2
144
38
E
c
. c
62
62
PLYKC
PLYKC
BELVE
FURY
35C0
35CC
318
225
S3
A
2
1
49
125
13
33
1
4
c
c
c
0
62
62
PLYKC
PLYKC
FURY
FURY
35CC
35CC
225
318
S3
A
1
2
43
17C
11
45
1
t
c
c
0
c
62
PLYK.C
FL'RY
35CC
318
S3
2
58
15
2
0
0
62
62
PLYKC
PCNTI
STAWA
TEKPE
C
30CC
0
195
o -
A
C
1
271
743
72
659
9
546
c
42e
0
310
62
62
PCNTI
PCMI
TEKPE
CATAL
30CC
4CG0
195
389
S3
A
1
2
ite
12S8
166
1151
138
95E
1C8
74£
78
541
62
FCNTI
CATAL
40CG
389
S3
2
6E
tc
5C
39
28
62
62
PCMI
PCNTI
STARC
STARC
4CCC
4CG0
389
389
A
S3
2
2
288
15
255
13
212
11
166
8
12G
6
62
62
PONTI
PCNTI
BCNNE
BCKftE
4CC0
400C
389
389
A
S3
4
4
7C1
36
621
32
517
27
404
21
292
15
62
PONT I
GRANP
4CCC
389
A
4
2785
2470
2C55
16C6
1162
62
62
PCNTI
PCNTI
GRANP
STAWA
4000
0
389
0
S3
0
¦ 4
0
14
356
13
315
1C
262
e
2C5
6
148
3U9
-------
VR HAKE MODEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGIST ER EC PPGJECTED-PID
D1SP TYEE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
61
APKCT
AMERI
30C0
196
A
1
441
323
215
123
. 58
61
61
AMMCT
AKWCT
AMERI
CLASS
30CC
35C0
196
196
S3
A
1
1
452
717
331
525
221
350
126
2CC
60
95
61
61
AMMGT
ACKCT
CLASS
CLASS
35CC
350 J
196
25C
S3
A
1
2
734
25
538
18
358
12
205.
7
97
3
61
AKHCT
CLASS
35CC
25C
S3
2
26
19
12
7
3
61
61
AKKCT
AHKCT
AKEAS
AMfcAS
3500
35CC
327
327
A
S3
2
2
69
71
5G
52
33
34
19
19
9
9
61
61
6UICK
BUICK
SPEC I
SPECI
3CCC
30C0
215
215
A
S3
2
2
627
97
562
' 9C
513
8C
435
67
352
55
61
BUICK
LESAB
45C0
364
A
2
£37
776
685
581
470
61
61
BUICK
BUICK
LESAB
1NVIC
45C0
45CG
364
401
S3
A
2
4
9
24 E
8
2 3C
7
203
6
172
5
139
61
61
BUICK
BUICK
INVIC
ELECT
45G0
45CC
401
4C1
S3
A
4
4
2 .
271
2
251
2
222
1
188
1
152
61
BUICK
ELECT
45CG
401
S3
4
3
2
2
2
1
61
61
BUICK
CAC1L
STAVA
CAC1L
0
5CC0
0
390
0
A
- 0
4
69
1119
64
1C48
57
947
48
826
39
694
61
61
CHE VP
CHEVR
CORVA
CCPVA
275C
2750
145
145
A
S3
2
2
1277
75C
1C26
6 C 2
777
456
542
3ie
342
2C1
61
CHEVR
CHEV2
2CCC
153
A
1
141
114
86
60
38
61
61
CHEVR
CHEVR
CHEV2
BISCA
30CC
35CC
153»
236
S3
A
1
1
£3
483
66
see
5C
294
35
205
22
. 129
61
61
ChEVR
CHEVR
BISCA
BISCA
35CG
35GC
236
2e3
S3
A
1
2
236
615
191
494
145
374
1C1
261
63
164
61
CHEVR
EISCA
35CC
283
S3
2
302
243
164
12£
• 81
61
61
CHEVR
CHEVR
BELAI
BEL A I
35CG
35G0
236
236
A
S3
1
1
648
319
521
256
394
194
275
135
173
85
61
61
CHEVR
CHEVR
BELAI
EELAI
4CG0
4CCC
283
283
A
S3
2
2
825
4C6
<63
326
502
247
350
172
221
1G8
61
CHEVR
1MPAL
35CC
236
A
1
9£8
793
601
419
264
61
61
CHEVR
CHEVR
IMPAL
IMPAL
35C0
4CCG
236
283
S3
A
1
2
4£7
1258
391
1C1C
296
765
206
533
130
337
61
61
CHEVR
CHEVR
IKPAL
CORVE
4000
3GCC
283
283
S3
A
2
4
619
44
497
36
377
27
263
19
166
12
61
CHEVR
CORVE
3CCC
283
S3
4
26
21
16
11
7
61
61
CHEVR
CHRYS
STAItA
NEhPO
G
4CCC
C
361
C
A
0
2
1111
367
£92
325
676
265
471
205
297
148
61
61
CHRYS
CHRYS
30C
NEkYO
45C0
45CC
413
413
A
A
4
4
116
150
1C3
133
£4
ICE
65
83
47
60
61
CHRYS
ST# KA
0
0
C
0
37
it
27
20
15
61
61
DCDC-E
DCDC-E
LAIvCE
LAKCE
3GC0
3CCC
17C
17C
A
S3
1
1
334
S3
267
74
20C
55
139
38
87
24
61
61
DODGE
DCCGE
DAR1
DART
3GCC
3CC0
225
225
A
S3
1
1
287
EC
229
63
172
48
119
33
75
20
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAeCRATCPIES, IKC.
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE, ALRCRA, COLC.
350
-------
VR
MAKE
MODEL
~EIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-MID
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
61
DODGE
DART
30C0
318
A
2
5C1
4C1
3C1
2C8
131
61
CODGE
DART
3000
318
S3
2
139
111
84
58
36
61
DODGE
POLAR
35CC
361
A
2
71
56
42
29
18
61
DODGE
POLAR
3500
361
S3
2
19
15
11
8
5
61
FORD
FALCG
2750
144
A
1
1523
1278
1019
766
542
61
FCRD
FALCC
275C
144
S3
1
1662
1563
1246
938
663
61
FORD
FAIPL
35G0
223
A
1
352
296
236
177
125
61
FORD
FA1PL
3500
223
S3
1
173
145
116
£7
61
61
FCRC
FAIPL
35C0
292
A
2
733
615
490
369
261
61
FORD
FAIRL
35CC
292
S3
2
361
303
241
182
128
61
FCRD
GALAX
40C0
223
A
1
5£5
491
391
294
2C8
61
FORD
UAL AX
4CC0
223
S3
1
2££
241
192
145
1C2
61
FGRD
GALAX
4000
292
A
2
1215
1C 19
813
612
432
61
FORD
GALAX
40C0
292
S3
2
598
502
4CC
301
213
61
FCRC
TBIRO
45C0
390
A
4
57
48
38
28
20
61
FORC
TBIRD
45C0
390
S3
4
1
0
0
0
0
61
FCRD
STAKA
0
0
o -
0
921
773
616
464
328
61
IMPER
IMPER
50CC
413
A
4
114
87
55
26
7
61
LINCO
LIKCC
5500
430
A
4
259
260
254
248
242
61
KERCU
CCMET
275C
144
A
1
845
737
618
497
382
61
KERCU
COKET
2750
144
S3
1
518
451
379
305
234
61
KERCU
METEO
4000
223
A
1
43
38
32
25
19
61
KERCU
MET EC
4000
223
S3
1
26
23
19
15
12
61
KERCU
METEO
4CCC
292
A
2
131
114
96
77
59
61
KERCU
METEO
4000
292
S3
2
ec
7C
59
47
36
61
KERCU
HCNTR
4000
292
A
2
292
255
213
172
132
61
KERCU
MONTR
40C0
292
S3
2
179
156
131
105
81
61
MERCU
STAWA
0
0
0
0
128
112
94
75
58
61
CLDSM
F-85
3CC0
215
A
2
263
188
115
53
16
61
CLCSM
F-E5
3CCC
215
S3
2
263
188
115
53
16
61
CLDSK
88
45CC
394
A
2
1394
999
61C
281
86
61
GLDSM
66
4500
394
S3
2
16
12
7
3
1
61
CLDSM
98
45C0
394
A
4
335
240
146
67
20
61
CLOSM
98
45C0
394
S3
4
4
2
1
0
0
61
CLCSM
STARF
45C0
394
A
4
60
43
26
12
3
61
CLOSK
STARF
45CC
394
S3
4
0
0
C
C
0
61
CLDSM
ST Ah A
C
0
C
0
ice
78
47
21
6
61
PLYFO
VALIA
3CC0
17C
A
1
45E
363
273
1£9
120
61
PLYKG
VALIA
3000
17C
S3
1
365
29C
218
151
96
61
PLYMO
SAVOY
35CC
225
A
1
ice
85
64
44
28
61
PLYKC
SAVCY
35C0
225
S3
1
38
20
23
16
10
61
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
318
A
2
162
128
96
67
42
61
PLYKC
SAVCY
35C0
318
S3
2
57
46
34
24
15
61
PLYKO
BELVE
35C0
225
A
1
102
81
61
42
27
61
PLYKC
EELVE
3500
225
S3
1
36
29
21
15
9
AUTOMOTIVE TESTING LAECRATCRIES. INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AL'RCRA, CCLC.
351
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-HID
4
OISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1S71
72
73
74
75
61
PLYMO
BELVE
35CC
318
A
2
125
99
74
52
33
61
PLYMO
BEL VE
35C0
318
S3
2
44
35
26
18
11
61
PLYMO
FIRY
3SC0
225
A
1
1C6
84
63
44
28
61
PLYPO
FURY
35C0
225
S3
1
38
30
22
15
10
61
PLYKC
FURY
- 35CC
318
A
2
13C
1C3
77
54
34
61
PLYMO
FURY
35CC
318
S3
2
46
27
27
19
12
61
PLYMC
STAHA
0
C
0
C
249
197
148
103
65
352
-------
VR
PAKE
KCDEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
OISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARB
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PRGJECTEO-MID
72 73 74
i
75
60
AKMCT
AFERI
30CC
196
A
1
379
276
164
1C8
54
60
6C
AMMGT
AhPCT
AMERI
CLASS
3CC0
35CC
196
196
S3
A
X
1
388
SC3
283
659
188
436
110
257
56
13C
60
60
AKMGT
AKMCT
CLASS
CLASS
35C0
3SG0
196
25C
S3
A
1
2
924
52
675
38
449
25
264
15
133
7
60
AHMCT
CLASS
35CC
25C
S3
2
53
39
26
15
7
60
60
AfKCT
AH.KC'T
AMBAS
AM3AS
35C0
3 SCC
327
327
A
S3
2
2
72
74
52
54
35
35
2G
21
10
1G
60
60
CUICK
BUICK
SPEC I
SPECI
30GC
3CC0
215
215
A
S3
2
2
67
16
54
13
41
10
2e
7
17
4
60
BUICK
LESAB
4500
364
A
2
757
614
45e
316
196
60
60
BUCK
BUICK
LESAB
INVIC
45CC
45C0
364
401
S3
A
2
4
8
216
6
175
5
131
3
9C
2
56
60
60
QUICK
euicK
1NVIC
ELECT
45 CC
45GC
401
401
S3
A
4
4
2
3C3
1
246
1
163
1
126
0
79
60
Bt'ICK
ELECT
45C0
401
S3
4
3
2
2
1
0
60
60
BUICK
CAOIL
STAWA
CADIL
0
5CCC
0
390
c •
A
• 0
4
63
1105
51
1C79
38
992
26
894
16
788
60
60
CHEVR
CHE VR
CORVA
COFVA
2750
2750
140
140
A
S3
I
1
676
514
7C1
411
522
3C7
361
212
228
134
60
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
236
A
1
512
4C9
305
211
133
60
60
CHEVR
CHEVR
B1SCA
EISCA
35C0
35C0
236
283
S3
A
1
2
252
651
2C1
521
15C
386
1C4
268
65
170
60
60
CHEVR
CHEVR
BISCA
BELAI
35CG
35C0
283
236
S3
A
2
1
321
7C9
256
567
191
422
132
292
83
165
60
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
236
S3
1
249
279
208
143
91
60
6C
CHEVR
CHEVR
BELAI
BELAI
35CC
35CG
283
283
A
S3
2
2
9C2
444
721
355
538
265
372
183
235
116
60
60
CHEVR
CHEVR
IMPAL
I MPAL
35C0
35CC
236
236
A
S3
1
1
962
4e3
785
3E6
585
288
4C4
199
256
126
60
CHEVR
IHPAL
35C0
283
A
2
12 SC
999
745
515
326
60
60
CHEVR
CHEVR
IMPAL
CORVE
35C0
3GCG
283
283
S3
A
2
4
615
42
492
34
367
25
253
17
160
11
o o
<0
CHEVR
CHEVR
CCRVE
STAWA
300G
0
283
•o
S3
0
4
0
25
1324
20
1C59
14
789
1C
545
6
345
60
CHRYS
NEKPO
4000
383
A
2
2C9
171
122
78
43
60
60
CHRYS
CHRYS
3C0
NEtiYO
45CC
45C0
413
413
A
A
4
4
13
6C
11
49
7
35
5
22
2
12
60
60
CHRYS
DC0GE
STAfcA
LANCE
0
30C0
0
361
C
A
C
?
11
53
9
29
6
25
4
15
2
7
60
DC0GE
LANCE
3CC0
361
S3
2
14
10
7
4
2
60
60
DCCGE
DODGE
DART
DART
35G0
35CC
225
225
A
S3
1
1
356
99
26C
72
171
47
1C1
28
52
14
60
60
DCDGE
DCDGE
DART
DART
3 5 CO
35CC
318
318
A
S3
2
2
623
173
455
127
299
83
176
49
92
25
AUTGHCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCR IES« IKC.
1990C E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURORA, CCLC.
353
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CAR6
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEC-K1D
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
60
DODC-E
POL/R
35CC
383
A
4
126
92
60
35
18
60
CCDGE
POLAR
35C0
383
S3
4
35
25
16
9
5
60
FORO
FALCO
275C
144
A
1
1C16
735
494
30C
161
60
FCRD
FALCC
2750
144
S3
1
1242
£98
6C4
366
197
60
FORD
FA1RL
35C0
223
A
1
461
333
224
136
73
60
FCRD
FAIPL
35C0
223
S3
1
227
164
11C
67
36
60
FORD
FAIRL
35CG
292
A
2
958
tS3
466
283
152
60
FCRD
FAIPL
35CC
292
S3
2
472
341
2 29
139
75
60
FORD
GALAX
40CC
223
A
1
324
234
158
95
51
60
FCRD
GALAX
40 CO
223
S3
1
159
115
77
47
25
6C
FCRD
GALAX
4GC0
2S2
A
2
674
487
328
199
107
60
FCRD
GAL/X
40 CO
292
S3
2
232
240
161
96
52
60
FCRD
TB1RD
4GCC
352
A
4
4CC
289
194
11B
63
60
FCRD
TBIPC
40C0
352
S3
4
8
5
3
2
1
60
FCRD
STAkA
0
0
G
0
£33
6C2
405
246
132
, 60
1HPER
IMPER
50CO
413
A
4
IC7
74
44
20
6
60
LINCC
LINCO
55CC
430
A *
4
145
125
104
64
66
60
OLCSM
F-E5
3CCC
215
A
2
36
27
19
12
6
60
CLDSH
F-85
300C
215
S3
2
36
27
19
12
6
60
CLDSM
88
45C0
371
A
2
1119
841
596
371
21C
60
CLDSM
86
45C0
371
S3
2
13
10
7
4
2
60
CLDSK
96
4 5C0
394
A
4
24C
iec
126
79
45
6C
0LD5M
98
45CO
394
S3
4
2
2
1
0
0
60
CLDSM
STAhA
C
0
G
0
62
61
42
27
15
60
PL YKG
VALIA
30C0
17C
A
1
4 87
277
122
33
4
60
PLYKC
VAL'IA
3CCC
17C
S3
1
3E8
221
9£
26
3
60
PLYKC
SAVOY
35C0
225
A
1
258
147
65
17
2
60
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CO
225
S3
i
92
52
23
6
0
60
PLYfC
6ELVE
35CC
225
A
1
211
120
53
14
1
60
PLYNG
EELVE
35CC
225
S3
1
75
43
19
5
0
6G
PLYKC
FURY
350C
318
A
2
197
112
50
13
1
60
PLYKC
FURY
35CC
318
S3
2
7C
40
17
4
0
60
PLYMC
STAfcA
C
C
0
0
265
151
67
ie
2
60
PCNTI
TEfPE
3CC0
195
S3
1
56
40
24
13
5
60
PC N'T I
CATAL
4CC0
339
A
2
797
542
335
111
80
60
FCNTI
CAT/L
4CC0
309
S3
2
22
15
9
4
2
60
PCNTI
VENTU
4C00
389
A
2
241
164
101
54
24
60
PCNTI
VENTU
4CC0
389
S3
2
6
4
2
1
C
60
PCNTI
STARC
4CC0
389
A
4
199
135
83
44
20
60
PONT I
STARC
40CC
369
S3
4
5 ¦
3
2
1
0
6C
PCNTI
BONNE
45CC
389
A
4
374
254
157
84
37
60
PONTI
ECNNE
4500
389
S3
4
1C
7
4
2
1
60
PCNTI
S T # k A
C
C
C
170
116
71
38
17
60
*ERCU
CCKET
2750
144
A
1
541
42C
301
193
1C8
60
HER CI!
CChET
27 5 C
144
S3
1
331
257
184
118
66
AUTCMC'l IVE TESTING LAEOfiATCR IES,_JNC_.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE." AUCRA, CCLC."
351*
-------
VR MAKE MODEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGISTERED PRCJECTED-f ID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
60 HERCU MONTR 4500 312 A 2 665 516 37C 236 133
60 KERCU MGNTR 45G0 312 S3 2 57 44 32 20 11
_60_KERCU ST AHA 0 0 0 0 S23 717 514 33C 186
355
-------
YR 'HAKE MODEL WEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARB REGI STEREO PRC JECTED-K.ID
. DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
59
AMMCT
AMERI
30CC
196
A
1
330
196
104
45,
15
59
AMKCT
AMtRI
3oeo
196
S3
1
365
216
115
50
16
59
AK.KCT
CLASS
2 5CC
ise
A
1
172
1C2
54
23
e
59
AKKCT
CLASS
3500
196
S3
1
ISO
113
60
26
8
59
AMMOT
CLASS
35 CC
250
A
2
172
1C2
54
23
8
59
AKKCT
CLASS
35C0
25C
S3
2
190
113
60
26
8
59
AMKCT
AMBAS
3500
327
A
4
33G
196
104
45
15
59
AKKCT
AKEAS
35CC
327
S3
4
265
216
115
5C
16
59
BUICK
LESAB
45 CC
364
A
n
493
3G7
172
82
32
59
EUICK
LESAB
45C0
364
S3
2
5
3
2
1
0
59
BUICK
INVIC
45C0
401
A
4
246
153
86
41
16
59
BUICK
INVIC
45CC
401
S3
4
2
1
1
C
0
59
EUICK
ELECT
45CC
4 CI
A
4
246
153
86
41
16
59
EUICK
ELECT
45C0
401
S3
4
2
1
1
C
G
59
CACIL
CADIL
5CC0
390
A
4
819
67C
499
342
213
59
CHRYS
HINDS
40CC
3 83
A
2
23C4
15C8
1CC4
565
277
59
CHRYS
SARAT
45C0
363
A -
4
2370
1633
1C33
561
2e5
59
CKRYS
NE hYO
45C0
413
A
4
237C
1633
1033
581
285
59
CCOGE
CORCN
3500
230
A
1
16
1C
6
3
1
59 DCDCE CORCS 35CC 23G S3 1 1 0 0 C C
59 CCDGE CCRCN 35C0 326 A 2 • 70 45 27 14
59 DCDGE CCBCN 35C0 ~326 S3 2 4 2 1 C 0
59_ CCCGE RCY£L _40GC 361 A 4 157 1C1 61 31 ¦ 13
59 DCOGE ROYAL 4GCC "361 S3 4" 10 6 3 2 0
59 FCRD FAIRL 35CG 223 A 1 1G5 72 46 26 13
45 31 2 C 11 5
253 244 156 90 46
IS 1 IC4 66 36 IS
44 2C- IS 11 5
0 C 0 0 c
59 1MPER
IMPEP
5CCC
412
A
4
5363
3427
20C1
1022
447
59 LINCC
LINCC
5CC0
43C
A
4
73
49
29
15
6
59 KERCU
MCNTR
40CC
312
A
2
42
14
4
C
0
59 KERCU
M0N1R
4CC0
312
S3
2
1
C
0
0
0
59 HERCU
MONTC
45C0
363
A
4
42
14
4
c
c
59 MERCU
MONTC
45C0
383
S3
4
1
C
0
0
c
59 CLDSM
88
45CG
371
A
2
32C
44
5
c
0
59 OLDSM
88
45C0
371
S3
2
2
0
C
0
c
59 OLDSy,
98
45C0
394
A
4
32C
44
5
0
0
59 CLDSM
98
45C0
394
S3
4
2
0
0
0
0
59 PLYKD
SAVOY
35C0
230
A
1
102
59
30
11
3
59 PLYMG
SAVOY
35CC
230
S3
1
37
22
11
4
1
59 PLYK.C
SAVOY
35CC
318
A
2
232
135
18
27
8
59 PLYPC
SAVCY
3500
318
S3
2
85
49
25
9
2
59 PLYKO
8ELVE
35CC
23C
A
1
102
59
30
11
3
AUTGKCTIVE TESTING LA8CRATCR IES»_ INC.
1S9CC E. CCLFAX" AVENUE," /UKCRA, CCLC.
59
FCRD
FAIRL
3500
223
S3
1
59
FORD
FAIRL
35C0
292
A
2
59
FCRD
FAIRL
350C
2S2
S3
2
59
FCRD
TBIRD
4GC0
352
A
4
59
FCRD
TBIPD
40C0
352
S3
4
356
-------
YR
MAKE
HOOEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARB
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1971
PROJECTEG-KID
72 73 74
75
59
PLYFC
EEIVE
3500
230
S3
1
37
22
11
4
1
59
59
PLYKG
PLYKC
6ELVE
BELVE
3500
350C
3l£
318
A
S3
2
2
232
es
135
49
68
25
27
9
8
2
59
59
PLYKO
PLYKO
FURY
FURY
35C0
35C0
230
23 C
A
S3
1
1
102
37
59
22
30
11
11
4
3
1
59
PLYfrC
FURY
3SCC
318
A
2
232
135
68
27
8
59
59
PLYMO
PCNTI
FURY
CATAL
35C0
4CC0
318
389
S3
A
2
2
85
328
49
197
25
lCfc
9
5C
2
20
59
59
PCNTI
PCMI
CATAL
STARC
4CC0
4QCC ¦>
389
389
S3
A
2
2
9
328
c
197
3
1C6
1
50
C
20
59
PCNTI
STARC
40C0
369
S3
2
9
5
3
1
0
59
59
PCKTI
PCMI
BCNKE
eCNNE
4500
45CC
389
389
A
S3
2
2
328
9
197
5
106
3
5C
1
20
C
59
59
CHE VR
CHE VR
DELRA
OELRA
35C0
35CC
236
236
A
S3
1
1
475
246
3C6
16C
177
92
88
46
36
19
59
CHEVR
OELRA
350C
283
A
2
247
159
92
45
19
59
59
CHEVR
CHEVP.
DELRA
DISC A
35CC
35C0
283
236
S3 *
A
2
1
129
190
83
122
48
71
23
35
9
14
59
59
CHEVR
CHEVR
E1SCA
elSCA
35CC
35C0
236
283
S3
A
1
2
99
285
64
ie3
37
106
18
52
7
21
59
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
283
S3
2
148
95
55
27
11
59
59
CHEVR
CHEVR
BELAI
6ELAI
3500
35CG
236
236
A
S3
1
1
3C4
ne
1S6
1C2
113
59
56
29 •
23
12
59
59
ChEVR
CHEVR
BELAI
BELAI
35CC
35C0
283
2£3
A
S3
2
2
36C
198
245
128
141
74
7C
36
29
15
59
CHEVR
CCRVE
3CCC
2 83
A
2
ie
U
£
1
59
CHEVR
CORVE
3CC0
283
S3
2
9
6
3
1
0
357
-------
YR
HAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PROJECTED-KID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
58
AF.KCT
AKERI
3C0C
196
A
1
CC
47
26
13
5
58
AMKLT
AMERI
3000
196
S3
1
es
52
29
14
6
58
APKCT
CLASS
35C0
196
A
1
2C
11
6
3
1
58
AMMOT
CLASS
35C0
19£
S3
1
22
13
7
3
iv ....
58
A**CT
CLASS
35CC
25C
A.
2
12
7
4
2
0
58
AHKCT
CLASS
3 5CC
25C
S3
2
13
8
4
2
0 -
58
Af-P.CT
AMeAS
35CC
327
A
4
15
9
E
2
1
58
AHMOT
AMEAS
3 5CC
327
S3
4
17
10
5
2
1
58
EUICK
SPECI
4C0Q
364 ,
A
2
3C
C
C
C
G
58
BUICK
SPEC I
4CCC
364
S3
2
0
0
0
0
0
50
EUICK
CEKTU
45CC
364
A
2
329
7
c
c
0
58
EUICK
CEMU
45CC
364
S3
2
4
C'
C
c
0
58
euiCK
SUPER
4500
364
A
4
91
2
0
c
c
58
BtICK
SUPER
45C0
364
S3
4
1
0
0
c
0
58
EUICK
RGADM
5GCG
364
A
4
134
3
c
C
0
58
BUI CK
ROACM
5CC0
364
S3
4
1
n
c
C
C
58
BUICK
LIMIT
5CCC
364
A -
4
24
0
G
0
0
58
BUICK
LIMT
5CCC
364
S3
4
0
0
0
0
0
58
CAD1L
CAOIL
5CCC
365
A
4
SBC
352
213
no
46
58
CHE VR
DELPA
3500
236
A
1
1661
1C 60
63C
334
154
58
CHE VR
DELRf
35CG
236
S3
1
£77
CO
329
174
80
58
CHE VR
DELPA
35CC
283
A
2
674
551
328
173
EC
58
CHEVR
DELRA
3 5CC
283
S3
2
456
288
171
90 -
42
58
CHE VR
BISCA
350G
236
A
1
672
423
252
133
61
58
CHEVR
BI SCA
3 500
236
S3
1
350
221
131
69.
32
58
CHEVR
bisca
35 CC
283
A
2
1CC9
636
378
2CC
53
58
CHEVR
BISCA
35CC
283
53
2
526
322
197
104
48'
58
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
236
A
1
821
518
30E
163
75
58
CHEVR
BELA1
35CC
236
S3
1
428
270
160
85
39
58
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
283
A
2
1346
£49
5C5
267
124
58
CHEVR
BELAI
3500
283
S3
2
7C3
443
263
139
64
58
CHEVR
CORVE
3CGC
283
A
2
66
43
25
13
6
58
CHEVR
cap.vE
3CCC
283
S3
2
35
22
13
7
3
58
CDDGE
CGPCN
35C0
23 C
A
1
10
R
2
1
0
58
OCO GE
CCPCN
3500
23C
S3
1
0
0
C
0
0
58
CCDGE
COPCN
35C0
325
A
2
13
7
4
1
0
58
CCDGE
CORCN
35CC
325
S3
2
C
C
0
C
c
58
OCDC-E
RCYAL
40CO
325
A
2
124
66
35
15
5
58
CCDGE
RGYAL
4C0C
325
S3
2
7
4
2
1
C
58
DODGE
CUSTO
4QCC
350
A
4
55
30
15
7
2
58
DCOGE
CUSTC
40CC
350
A
4
3
1
1
C
0
58
FCRC
CUSTO
35C0
223
A
1
141
1
0
0
0
58
FCRD
CLSTC
35C0
223
S3
1
60
C
C
0
0
58
FCRD
CUSTC
35C0
252
A
2
25
G
0
c
0
58
FGRD
CUSTC
35CC
292
S3
2
11
0
c
C
C
AUTOKCTIVE TESTING IABCRATCRIES, INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE* AURORA, CCLC.
358
-------
VR HAKE
HOC EL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
CARE
RECISTEREC
PROJECTED—1*. ID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
58 FORD
FA1RL
3ECG
223
A
1
146
1
0
0
0
58 FCRD
FAIRL
35CO
223
S3
1
ti
0
c
c
0
58 FGRD
FAIRL
35CO
292
A
n
0
c
c
0
58 FCRO
FAIRL
25CC
292
S3
33
c
c
c
0
58 FGRD
FA5CC
35CC
223
A
1
SO
1
0
c
0
58 FCRD
FA5CC
35C0
223
S3
ill
CD
c
C
c
0
58 FCRD
FA5CC
35C0
.332
A
4
122
1
0
0
0
58 FCRD
FA5CC
35CC
332
S3
4
52
0
c
0
0
58 FCRD
T6IRC
40CC
352 .
A
54
0
C
c
0
58 FCRD
TBIRD
4000
352
S3
4
1
0
0
c
0
. 58 IKPER
IKPER
5CCC
43C
A
4
2C47
349
o
5
c
58 LINCC
LINCC
50CC
430
A
4
55
23
8
2
0
58 t-ERCU
HCNTR
4500
383
A
4
ie
4
1
C
c
58 MERCK
MONTR
45C0
383
S3
4
c
0
c
c
c
58 KERCU
MCNTC
45C0
383
A
4
3
0
C
c
0
58 HERCU
MCNTC
45CC
383
S3
c
0
c
c.
0
58 KERCU
PARKL
45C0
430
A -
4
29
• 7
1
c
0
58 HERCU
PARKL
45CC
43C
S3
4
C
0
C
c
0
58 GLOStt
88
45C0
371
A
32
15
7
3
1
58 CLDSM
88
45C0
371
S3
C
0
0
0
0
58 CLDSK
suipes
4500
371
A
4
229
1C4
53
23
9
58 CLDSM
SUP68
45C0
371
S3
4
2
0
0
0
0
58 CLCSH
98
45C0
371
A
4
65
30
15
6 .
2
58 CLDSK
98
45 CC
371
S3
4
C
0
0
C
0
58 PLYf.G
PLAZA
35CG
23C
A
1
237
8
C
c
G
5e PLYP.O
PLAZA
35C0
230
S3
87
3
0
c
0
58 PLYfO
PLAZA
35CC
318
A
28
1
c
0
0
58 PLYFC
PLAZA
35CC
318
S3
10
0
0
c
0
58 PLYKO
SAVCY
35CC
23C
A
1
38
1
c
c
0
58 PLYKC
SAVCY
3500
230
S3
1
14
c
c
0
G
58 PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
318
A
38
1
c
c
0
58 PLYKC
SAVCY
35C0
318
S3
14
0
0
0
0
58 PLYKC
6ELVE
35CC
230
A
1
48
1
C
c
0
58 PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
230
S3
1
17
C
C
c
0
58 PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
318
A
2
24
0
0
c
0
58 PLYKC
BELVE
35C0
318
S3
2
8
0
0
0
0
58 PLYMO
FURY
40CC
318
A
2
68
2
c
0
0
58 PLYKC
FURY
4CCC
318
S3
2
25
C
c
c
0
58 PONTI
CHIEF
4CCG
37C
A
2
293
0
c
c
0
58 PCNTI
CHIEF
40C0
370
S3
2
e
C
0
c
0
58 PONTI
SUPCH
4GCC
370
A
2
93
c
0
0
0
58 PCNTI
SUPCH
4CC0
370
S3
2
2
0
c
c
0
58 PCNTI
STARC
40CC
37C
A
4
81
0
• c
c
0
58 PCNTI
STARC
4CCC
370
S3
4
2
0
c
c
0
58 PCNTI
BCNNE
4CCC
37C
A
4
144
0
0
0
0
AUTCCCTIVE TESTING LABCRATCRIES, INC.
1990C E. CCIFAX AVENUE. AlKCRA, CCLC.
359
-------
YR HAKE MOOEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARe REGISTERED PRCJEC1EC-KID
DISP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
56 PCNTI BONNE 40OG 370 S3 4 4 0 C 0 0
360
-------
YR
"HAKE
MODEL
hEIGHT
ENG.
TRANS
caret
REGISTERED
PRCJECTEC-MIO
D1SP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
57
AMHC7
HOPNE
40CO
327
A
2
47
23
11
4
1
57
AWCT
HCKNE
4CCC
327
S3
2
£2
26
12
5
1
57
AMMGT
METRC
ZZiC
91
S3
1
48
23
9
3
57
AKMCT
RAP.EL
30C0
196
S3
1
26
13
t
2
0
57
AMHCT
NASH
ACCC
196
S3
1
38
19
9
3
1
57
EUICK
SPECI
450C
364
A
2
ICO
3
C
C
0
57
BUICK
SPECI
45 CC
364
S3
2
1
0
0
C
0
57
EUICK
CEMU
45C0
364
A
4
315
10
c
C
0
57
BUICK
CEML
45C0
364
S3
4
3
0
0
C
0
57
EUICK
SUPER
45C0
364
A
4
112
3
0
c
0
57
BUCK
SUPER
45CC
364
S3
4
1
0
0
c
0
57
BUICK
ROACH
45C0
364
A
4
13C
4
0
c
0
57
BUICK
RGADP
45G0
364
S3
4
1
0
0
c
0
57
CADIL
CACIL
5C0C
365
A
4
474
299
181
97
46
57
CHEVR
I5C
35 CC
236
A
1
1640
£04
144
21
1
57
CHEVR
15C
35CC
236
S3
1
856
263
75
11
0
57
CHEVR
150
35CC
265
A
2
164G
5C4
144
21
1
57
CHEVR
15C
35CC
265
S3
2
£56
263
75
11
0
57
CHEVR
15C
35CC
283
A
2
23C1
708
2C2
30
1
57
CHEVR
15C
35CC
2E3
S3
2
12C1
369
ICS
15
0
57
CHEVR
21C
35CC
236
A
1
1640
504
144
21
1
57
CHEVR
21C
35CC
236
S3
1
856
263
75
11
0
57
CHEVR
210
35C0
265
A
2
1316
404
iiJL
17
1
57
CHEVR
21C
35CC
265
S3
2
687
211
60
9
0
57
CHEVR
21C
35CC
283
A
2
2132
656
187
28
1
57
CHEVR
210
35CC
283
S3
2
1113
342
97
14
0
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
236
A
1
1147
352
IOC
15
c
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
236
S3
1
55S
184
52
7
0
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35CG
265
A
2
2132
656
ie7
28
1
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
265
S3
2
1113
342
97
14
0
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
283
A
2
2463
757
216
32
1
57
CHEVR
BELAI
35 CC
283
S3
2
1286
395
113
16
1
57
CHEVR
CCRVE
3000
263
A
2
161
49
14
2
c
57
CHEVR
CGRVE
30CC
283
S3
2
84
26
7
1
0
57
CKPYS
W Ift'CS
45CC
354
A
4
31
C
C
• 0
0
57
CHRYS
SARAT
4 5C0
354
A
4
15
0
0
0
0
57
CHRYS
NEWYO
45C0
392
A
4
80
C
c
c
0
57
CHRYS
3.0 C
45CC
392
A
4
186
1
0
c
0
57
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
220
A
1
2E2
2
0
c
0
57
DODGE
CORLN
35C0
230
S3
1
18
C
c
0
0
57
DGCGE
CCRCN
35CC
325
A
2
188
1
c
c
0
57
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
325
S3
2
12
C
c
c
0
57
CCDGE
ROYAL
40C0
325
A
2
62
0
0
c
0
57
CCDGE
RCYAL
40CC
325
S3
2
4
0
c
0
0
57
CCDGE
CLS1G
40C0
325
A
4
94
' 0
0
c
0
AUTCKCTIVE TESTING LABCRMCR 1ES» IKC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE* AURCRA, CCLC.
361
-------
YR
HAKE
MODEL
KEIC-HT
ENG. TRANS
CARE
REGISTERED
PRCJECTED-KID
DISP TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72 73
74
75
57
CCDGE
ClISTO
40CO
325 S3
4
6
0 0
0
.0
57
FCRO
ClISTC
350C
223 A
1
2498
899 348
ICS
24
57
FCRO
CUSTC
3 5'CO
223 S3
1
1C70
385 149
45
10
57
FCBD
CUSTO
3CCC
272 A
2
2 97
1C7 41
12
2
57
FCRD
CUSTC
3CC0
272 S3
2
127
45 17
5
1
57 FGRO FAIPL
35CC
223
A
1
2C81
749
29C
88
20
57 FCKO FAIRL
35CG
223
S3
1
£92
321
124
37
8
57 FORD FAIRL
35C0
272
A
2
1C69
2e4
148
45
10
57 FCRD FAIRL
35C0
272
S3
2
458
164
63
19
4
57 IKPER IKPER
5CCC
392
A
4
C
C
C
C
C
57
LINCO
LINCO
5CCC
36e
A
4
84
16
.3
0
0
57
MEPCU
KCNTR
4CC0
312
A
2
141
53 ;
21
7
2
57
KERCU
MCKTR
4CC0
312
S3
2
3
1
C
C
0
57
KERCU
KCKTC
4CC0
312
A
4
141
53
21
7
2
57
KERCU
KOMC
4GC0
312
S3
4
3
1
0
C
0.
57
HERCU
TURNP
45CC
368
A
4
31
12
4
1
0
57
KERCU
TU^NP
45CG
368
S3
4
C
0
C
0
0
57
CLDSM
88
. 4500
371
A
4
282
55
12
1
0
57
OLOSM
£8 •
45CG
371
.S3
4
2
0
C
0
o .
57
CLDSM
SUP88
45C0
371
A
4
146
c £
6
1
0
57
CLDSM
SCP68
45CC
371
S3
4
1
• 0
0
C
0
57
CLDSX
98
450C
371
A
4
1C8
21
4
0
0
57
OLOSM
98
45C0
371
S3
4
C
0
0
c
0
57
FLYMO
PLAZA
35C0
23C
A
1
247
1
G
c
0
57
FLYKC
PLAZA
35CC
2 30
S3
1
91
0
0 .
c
0
57
PLYKO
PLAZA
35CC
277
A
2
31
c
C
C
0
57
PLYKG
PLAZA
35GG
277
S3
2
i 11
0
c
0
0
57
PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
23C
A
1
111
: c
c
0
0
57
PLYMO
5 A VCY
35CC
23G
S3
1
40
0
c
c
0
57
PLYCC
SAVCY
3SCC
3G1
A
2
43
0
C
0
0
57
PLYPC
SAVCY
35CC
'301
S3
2
15
0
c
c
c
57
PLYKC
EELVE
35CC
230
A
1
37
c
0
0
0
57
PLYPC
eELVE
35CC
23C
S3
1
13
c
0
c
0
57
PLYKC
BELVE
35CC
3C1
A
2
- 62
G
0
0
-0
57
PLYfC
BELVE
35CC
301
S3
2
- 22
C
c
G
0
57
PLYPC
FURY
4CCG
318
A
4
- €6
0
: c-
0
0.
. ¦¦
57
PLYKC
FURY
4000
318
S3
4
31
c
0
G
0
362
-------
YR
MAKE
MODEL
HEIGHT
ENG.
DISP
TRANS
TYPE
CARE
TYPE
REGISTERED
JULY 1S71
PROJECTEC-MID
72 73 74
75
56
FORO
CL'STO
35CC
272
S3
2
55
25
12
5
2
56
56
FCRO
FORO
FAIRL
FMRL
35C0
35CG
233
233
A
S3
1
1
365
156
165
70
ei
35
35
15
13
5
56
56
FCRD
FORO
FAIRL
FAIRL
35CC
35C0
292
292
A
S3
2
2
345
156
165
70
81
35
35
15
13
5
56
FCPO
TE IRC
3500
292
A
2
214
57
4C
2C
7
56
56
FCRD
L1KCO
TBIRO
LUCO
35C0
45C0
292
368
S3
A
2
4
S2
C
41
C
2G
0
8
> 0
3
0
56
56
TlERCU
HERCU
MCMR
MONTR
4CCC
400C
312
312
A
S3
2
2
52
1
9
0
2
C
0
c
0
0
56
HERCU
MONTC
40C0
312
A
2
41
7
1
c
0
56
56
HERCU
CLDSM
MOKTC
68
4GCC
40C0
312
324
S3
A
2
2
1
35
0
15
0
7
c
3
0
1
56
56
GLDSM
CLDSM
88
Sl'P 88
4GC0
40CG
324
324
S3
A
2
4
0
2ES
0
126
0
62
c
27
0
10
56
CLDSM
SUP68
4CCG
324
S3
4
2
1
0
C
0
56
56
CLDSM
CLOSM
98
98
4500
45G0
324
324
A
S3
4
4
35
C
15
0
7
0
. 3
C
1
0
56
56
PLYMO
PLYMO
PLAZA
PLAZA
35CC
35C0
23C
23C
A
S3
1
1
246
9C
58
. 21
17
6
3
1
0
0
56
PLYMO
PLAZA
35CC
27C
A
2
55
13
3
0
0
56
56
PLY KG
PLYMO
PLAZA
SAVOY
35C0
35CC
27C
23C
S3
A
2
1
20
61
4
14
1
4
G
C
c
0
56
56
PLYfC
PLYKO
SAVCY
SAVOY
3500
35C0
23C
27C
S3
A
1
2
22
44
5
10
1
3
0
0
0
0
56
PLYKC
SAVCY
3 SCO
27C
S3
2
16
3
1
c
c
56
56
PLYKC
PLYCC
8ELVE
BELVE
35CC
35CC
23C
230
A
S3
1
1
66
24
15
5
4
1
1
c
0
0
56
56
PLYHC
PLYMC
FUPY
FURY
- 4GCG
4CCC
303
3C3
A
S3
2
2
84
30
20
7
5
2
1
c
0
0
56
PCNTI
CHIEF
4CC0
317
A
2
433
13
0
c
0
56
56
FONT I
PCNTI
CHIEF
STARC
4CCC
4CCC
317
317
S3
A
2
2
12
144
0
4
c
c
c
c
0
0
56
PONT1
STARC
4CC0
317
S3
2
4
0
0
0
0
363
-------
1 YR
MAKE
MODEL
WEIGHT
ENG.
TRAKS
CARe
REGISTERED
PPCJECTED-HID
DISP
TYPE
TYPE
JULY 1971
72
73
74
75
E5
AMMCT
hASP
35CC
2C2
S3
1
C
1
0
c
0
55
AWC-T
HCRKE
40GC
32C
S3
2 .
C
1
C
0
0
55
BUICK
SPEC I
40C0
264
A
2
C
C
C
c
0
55
BUICK
SPEC 1
4CCC
264
S3
2
0
0
0
0
0
55
etiCK
SUPER
4CCC
322
A
2
C
4
C
0
0
55
BUICK
CEKTU
4C00
322
A
4
C
1
0
c
0
55
BUICK
ROACM
45C0
322
A
4
C
1
0
c
0
55
CADI L
CADIL
45C0
331
A
4
0
1
0
c
0
55
Chevr
15C
35CC
236
A
1
C
317
165
74
27
55
CHEVR
150
350C
236
S3
1
c
293
152
66
25
55
CHEVR
150
35CC
265
A
2
C
223
116
52
19
55
CHEVR
150
35C0
265
S3
2
0
ie2
95
42
16
55
CHEVR
210
35C0
236
A
1
C
381
195
69
33
55
CHEVR
21C
3500
236
S3
1
0
352
ie3
E2
31
55
CHEVR
210
35CC
265
A
2
C
290
151
66
25
55
CHEVR
210
35CC
265
S3
2
c
237
124
55
20
55
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
236
A
1
0
296
154
69
26
55
CHEVR
BELAI
35CC
236
S3
1
0
273
142
64
24
55
CHEVR
BELAI
3500
265
A
2
C
448
234
1C4
39
55
CHEVR
BELAI
35C0
265
S3
2
c
366
191
85
32
55
CHEVR
CORVE
3000
265
A
2
C
122
63
28
10
55
CHEVR
CORVE
3CCC
265
S3
2
c
265
148
66
25
55
CHRYS
vises
4CC0
301
A
2
c
0
C
C
0
55
CHRYS
IMPER
45CG
331
A
4
c
0
0
C
0
55
CCDGE
CCRCN
35C0
27C
A
2
C
0
G
0
0
55
CCDGE
RCY/L
35CC
27C
A
2
c
0
0
C
0
55
DCDGE
ROY/L
3500
27C
S3
2
0
0
C
c
0
55
DODGE
CUSTO
35CC
27C
A
2
c
C
0
c
0
55
CCDGE
CUSTC
35C0
270
S3
2
c
C
c
c
C
55
CCDGE
CUSTO
35CC
23C
A
1
0
0
0
c
C
55
DODGE
CUSTC
35C0
230
S3
1
c
0
c
c
0
55
FORD
MAINL
35CC
223
A
1
C
~69
34
14
5
55
FCRO
NAINL
3 5 CO
223
S3
1
C
276
136
59
23
55
FCRD
KAIKL
3500
272
A
2
C
28
12
6
2
55
FORD
PA I ML
35CC
272
S3
2
c
26
13
6
2
55
FCRC
CUSTC
35C0
223
A
1
C
•72
35
15
6
55
FCRD
CUSTO
35C0
223
S3
1
c
72
35
15
6
55
FCRD
CUSTC
35CC
272
A
2
C
151
74
32
12
55
FCRD
CUSTO
35CC
272
S3
2
c
37
18
e
3
55
FCRD
FA1RL
3500
223
A
1
C
1C7
52
23
8
55
FCRD
FAIBl
35CC
223
S3
1
C
71
35
15
5
55
FCRD
FAIRL
35CC
272
A
2
0
1C7
52
23
6
55
FCRD
FAIPL
35CC
272
S3
2
c
26
13
5
2
55
FCRD
TB IRC
35C0
292
A
4
0
53
26
11
4
55
FCRC
TBIKC
35C0
292
S3
4
c
13
e
2
1
AUTCMGTIVE TESTING L AECR.A TCR 1ES , INC.
19900 E. CCLFAX AVENUE, AURCRA, CCLC.
361*
-------
YR PAKE KCDEL HEIGHT ENG. TRANS CARE REGISTERED PRCJECTED-HID
P1SP TYPE TYPE JULY 1971 72 73 74 75
55 LIKCC LINCC
4500
341
A
4
0
0
c
0
0
55 KERCU MCN1R
40C0
292
A
2
0
0
0
0
0
55 KERCH MCKTR
4CC0
292
S3
2
c
c
0
c
c
55 HERCU MANIC
4CCC
292
A
2
c
0
0
0
0
55 K.ERCU KCMC
40CO
292
S3
3
c
0
c
0
0
55 OLOSM £8
4CCC
324
A
2
c
11
5
2
1
55 CLDSM 88
40C0
324
S3
2
c
c
c
C
0
55 cldsm supee
4CCC
324
A
4
0
90
44
20
8
55 CLDSK 98
4CC0
324
A
4
0
11
5
2
1
55 PlYKC PLAZA
35CC
23C
A
1
0
20
e
1
c
55 PLYKC
PLAZA
35CC
23C
S3 1
C
62
24
5
c
55 PLYK.O
PLAZA
35C0
26C
A 2
0
6
2
0
0
55 PLYKC
PLAZA
35C0
26C
S3 2
0
16
4
1
0
55 PLYKO
SAVOY
35CC
23 C
A 1
0
10
3
c
C
55 PLYKC
SAVCY
35CC
23C
S3 1
c
10
3
c
0
55 PLYKC
SAVOY
35CC
26C
A 2
0
34
10
2
0
55 FLYMO
SAVOY
35CG
26 C
S3 2
0
14
4
c
0
55 PLYKO
EELVE
3SC0
23C
A 1
c
21
6
1
c
55 PLYKC
BELVE
3500
23C
S3 1
0
9
2
c-
c
55 PLYMO
BELVE
35CC
26C
A 2
0
24
7
1
0
55 PLYKC BELVE 35CG 26C S3 2 0 6 1 C C
55 PCNTI CHIEF 4000 2e7 A 2 0 0 0 0 0
j>5_PCKTI CHIEF 40C0 267 S3 2 0 C C C 0
55 PC'NTI STAPC 4CCC 287 A 2 0 0 0 0 0"
55 PGNTI STARC 4000 287 S3 2 0 0 C C 0
365
-------
"bsST^" P(yM tpi"IQ-W
LOV-v.
:m
v ,
•CD U^s&A O^A^I .^W)aQ lh€^^VrtuK^> doXe 3*0 Wjfl
JuQ^Ctdbi
_ w-w^.v\,.\.\<.\y p^CaJbrcAjULcg-
>"} W^O^ ^ C-^wJ^lXuA. 4-0 OL^pAAClC-J^
i«A"ivoX^ |U\un4skv\
•^(^) dU.^S) yoigj^c^ (LtKTLtr*- Oh*^ O-^jxgA <3 ^x2U
uTVn _a._
_>-
XQ SAVvv^>fi- ^flicfc>V^; ^--dv-C^O V~~ dLoAo-eA^i^ct_J
$L&cJL\ \/M&Jfc-a. o-^. yj-g-C-io^g, vyv&ifl-g-
@) &tasA . 4x>f" (XA-Q ri ) <*a/v Q-ja-^ W^Aia^^fuAigAS - |Uo (tft/l>g| 4^-^1 |^XuAjZ-S
Cy\ I^aaa^ ^f-e>iui><-g'(--tiixJP<
0 fi> J I *¦ a^fict-c,-p
i^lAiiTUiU^^ Y a*Ma % fl^Lgu^tSf
83V- ccffVcIt^ / y ~ rA
• ®V- CC^lt-VA,*^ / 1/
VA^CVTCWU^-S . (^OAJchXV
u-ro-^- b J^jJU-<_ ^UmZ. -^A^" ¦
*S> jO^tac. S. ^-d\ A &xkA Qgy cr^, pJXj2.(^AC--ir-®--^[ t-"- *^S
A^SS . -. (^1 y
*J-e-&'t-fc<-la-'\>^-:l" . ^ C t & ) L>^ ^ CA/iftj- • V^y\-^g ^ t.-a^-*-c-^g-C
-------
' \l-g- '/> gjr^Y )&>e>SSfX-itXtAl-«--5 -—^ i^
\A\A jC^XjzA ^Acfr H/Cog^g. ~C«a^."( f"V-o<_ -
_co_l.da-3_1-
0-^) g-VS -^~o Cf^oJLo^ ~^ju\
\o } O-Vj S Vo -Kn^
HC, OO^
Md'iS ^ <lO)n I^-cIkO^ Lc/v-t ¦. ^ oiA_.i ->
_^CrOi
/ o-j fa .aASvoir (y-To{(A^<^\
c-o r-ro Jls>eAu_rgA^>t
------- |