/
- DRAFT -
A PRIMER ON
PRIVATE SUPPORT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
INITIATIVES
October 26, 1989
Office of Cooperative Environmental Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C.
1
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
8
9
9
10
10
12
13
14
14
14
16
16
17
17
18
20
21
21
21
23
24
25
25
25
26
26
28
29
31
36
41
- DRAFT -
CONTENTS
FORWARD
INTRODUCTION
I. Sources of Support
A. Foundation Support
1. Independent Foundations
2. Company - sponsored Foundations
3. Operating Foundations
4. Community Foundations
5. Number & Size
6. Geographic Distribution
B. Corporate Support
II. Types of Support
A. Direct Support
B. In-Kind Support
III. Development Process
A. The "Case Statement"
1. The problem
2. Goals/Objectives
3. Methods^rograms
4. Strategic Positioning
B. Gift Market Research
1. Support Mix
2. Donor Identification
3. Donor Evaluation
4. The Campaign Goal
C. Campaign Structure & Execution
1. Program Budget(s)
2. Solicitation V ehicles
3. Campaign Schedule
4. Follow - Through
D. Sustaining Partnerships
1. Donor Recognition
2. Program Evaluation
3. Future Initiatives
IV. Reference
A. Fiscal Data of Foundations by Region and State
B. Foundation Center Cooperating Collections Network
C. Sample Budget
D. Alphabetical List of Foundations
2
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
] 2
- DRAFT -
FOREWORD
The enormous challenge of managing environmental quality in this nation is one that can
only be met through the collective commitment and cooperation of many public and private sector
organizations. A critical catalyst for this cooperation has been the non-profit environmental
organization that appeals to both sectors for support of its environmental management initiatives.
The results of these appeals are often co-funded programs and projects that rtiaximize the value of
all individual support contributions and spawn partnerships among organizations for the
environment in both sectors. To perpetuate this important catalyst role that these organizations play
in the partnership process and to supplement its own support, US EPA has prepared this primer
for obtaining private (philanthropic) support for environmental management initiatives.
3
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
1 6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
- DRAFT -
INTRODUCTION
During 1988, United States citizens, foundations and,corporations contributed an estimated
$104.37 billion to charitable causes, $21.8 billion more than the entire federal government spent on
non-defense goods and services during the year. Of this total less than one half of one percent was
contributed toward environmental initiatives. Although there may be several factors responsible
for the inadequate attention the environment has received, the most compelling is that the non-profit
environmental organizations (NPEOs) have not effectively cultivated support of their initiatives
within the organized philanthropic community. This primer was prepared to assist the non-profit
community in its efforts to obtain philanthropic contributions for environmental management
initiatives. It is hoped that the primer and any additional agency assistance will ultimately enable
the non-profit community to leverage increased philanthropic support for the environment in the
years ahead.
The primer is structured in four sections: the first and second describe the basic sources
and types of philanthropic support available to non-profit organizations; the third section provides a
systematic process for obtaining "appropriate" support for the organization's environmental
initiative; and the fourth contains valuable reference materials on information resource centers and
the major philanthropic institutions around the nation. NOTE: This primer is meant to be a
newcomer's introduction to the basic elements of philanthropy in the environment and not an
exhaustive manual on the subject. Therefore, its sections describe, in overview fashion, the
principal considerations that non-profit organizations must examine in securing funding for
environmental initiatives. The only deviation from this generic approach can be found in Section
HI, The Development Process, where selective texts and techniques are suggested because of their
proven value to newly formed organizations.
4
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
- DRAFT -
I. Sources of Support
There are four basic sources of philanthropic support.that account for the $104.37 billion
contributed to charities durii.g the last year of record (1988). These are individuals, bequests,
foundations and corporations. Individuals contributed 83.1 percent or $86.70 billion of the total
given during the year, principally through employee payroll deduction plans (i.e., Combined
Federal Campaign), unified campaign drives (e.g., United Way), and through direct donations to
charitable, non-profit organizations. Bequests or donations provided for by activated wills,
accounted for 6.7 percent or $6.79 billion of the total. Foundations were responsible for 5.9
percent or $6.13 billion of total dollars given, typically through direct cash grants to charitable
organizations and in some cases to individuals. Corporations round out the total with 4.6 percent
or $4.75 billion contributed through corporate giving programs.
Figure 1 Percentages of Giving by Source
($104.37/Total)
6.7%
($6.79 billion)
5
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
] 7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3 1
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
Cultivating individual and bequest support for specific environmental management
initiatives is somewhat difficult and cost-ineffective for independent non-profit organizations.
Such support is most effectively sought through unified planned-giving experts and charitable
campaigns that work through major employee payroll deduotion programs, (e.g., the
Environmental Federation of America's use of the Combined Federal Campaign). In contrast,
foundation and corporate support can be effectively sought by the independent non-profit
organization through a variety of approaches described in this primer. Given the operational
constraint on cultivating individual and bequest support, this primer will narrow its focus to
foundation and corporate sources of support.
A. Foundation Support
As of this publication, there are approximately 27,000 foundations operating in the United
States. They are divided into four distinct types of institutions -- Independent, Company-
sponsored, Operating, and Community foundations. All four types are created by an original
donation of funds or property to an institution or group to produce income -- an endowment. The
interest income derived from the invested assets (or corpus) of the foundation are then disbursed
on an annual basis in the form of grants to charitable organizations for a broad variety of publicly
beneficial purposes. The first three types of foundations are classified as private foundations under
the federal tax law, which levies a 2 percent excise tax on the foundation's net investment income
and requires each foundation to "pay out" a minimum of 6 percent of the investment assets in
grants to charitable purposes each year. The fourth type, Community Foundations, are classified
as "public charities", and as such, they are exempt from the excise tax and most of the other federal
regulations governing private foundations. Further distinctions between these institutions are
provided in the profiles below:
1. Independent Foundations - There are approximately 21,600 independent or "general
purpose" foundations in the United States. They are established solely for the purpose of making
grants available for charitable activities. Independent foundations are typically endowed by a
wealthy individual or family. As a result, organizational control (philosophical basis, management
style and decision making) is usually maintained by the original donor, family members, or in
some cases, by a bank trust officer on behalf of the donor.
Independent foundations have few external restrictions on their grant-making; however,
most have established fairly well-defined subject areas within which they concentrate their grant-
6
-------
J
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
1 6
17
1 8
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
making. The larger independent foundations reveal these subject areas of interest in annual reports
and in the annual financial returns (Form PF-990) required by the IRS. Approximately 70 percent
of independent foundations limit their giving to recipients located within their own geographic area.
The remaining 30 percent give within a broader geographic (multi-state) region or on a national
basis.
2. Company-Sponsored Foundations - These private foundations are established to make
grants to charitable activities usually within the communities where the parent company maintains
its operations. Although these foundations are initially endowed and annually supported by the
parent profit-making company, the foundation is a separate and independent non-profit
organization, legally distinct from the parent.
Organizational control of the company-sponsored foundation is exercised by a Board of
Directors typically composed of corporate officials and prominent members of the communities that
they serve. Their grant-making is usually focused on subject matter that relates to the company's
interests and activities. In practically all cases, the company-sponsored foundation is interested in
realizing some tangible retum-on-investment, preferably close to the community within which it
must maintain favorable relations. Company-sponsored foundations typically give smaller grants
than the independent foundations but usually in greater numbers. The grant-making interests of
company-sponsored foundations can be found in the annual PF-990, and in some cases, in the
annual corporate reports.
3. Operating Foundations - Unlike the independent and company-sponsored foundations the
operating foundation is established to conduct research and to provide direct services. Although its
original endowment is usually derived from a single source it receives contributions from a wide
variety of donors sympathetic to its charter (e.g., National Fish and Wildlife Foundation).
Operating foundations rarely provide grant support to other organizations except in instances where
such organizations actively implement some aspect of the operating foundation's annual work plan.
Organizational control is exercised by an independent Board of Directors. Operating foundations
are focused on specific issues with very defined missions and as such have limited utility to those
seeking support or collaboration on more general or broad-range environmental management
initiatives.
4. Community Foundations - Often referred to as "Public Charities" or "Community Trusts",
these public foundations are established to support charitable activities that benefit a very specific
geographic area (e.g., the Chicago Community Trust serves the Chicago metropolitan area).
7
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4 1
42
43
44
- DRAFT -
Community Foundations are capitalized by a pool of donors and trusts across the community it
serves. Organizational control and governance is maintained by an independent Board of Directors
that typically represents the diversity of the community. Grant-making is usually confined to social
welfare services and is strictly limited to charitable organizations operating within the geographic
area described in the foundation's charter. Only rarely, in instances where an "outside"
organization's activities significantly benefit the chartered community, will the foundation consider
grant-making to organizations based outside its area. This geographic limitation does impede the
utility of the community foundations to those seeking support for multi-state or national
environmental management initiatives. All community foundations publish annual reports that
contain their areas of concentration, financial data, and recently funded projects.
5. Number and Size of Foundations - According to the most recent IRS survey, there are
approximately 27,000 charitable foundations on record in the United States. Approximately
22,150 of these are considered "active", making annual grants of at least $1.00. The most
significant (and noteworthy for our purposes) among this group are those whose assets equal or
exceed $1 million and whose annual giving equals or exceeds $100,000.00. There are
approximately 5,148 foundations that make up this general category which accounts for over 97
percent of all private foundation assets and 92 percent of all grants awarded each year. Table #1
provides a breakout of these foundations across the four donor categories described above:
Table #1 Number and Size of Foundations
Independent Foundations
Company-Sponsored
Foundations
Operation Foundations
Community Foundations
Total
Number
%
Asset?
&
Total
Givins
Sl
4,100
79.6
75,659,139
84.1
3,722,658
70.7
781
5.2
3,937,760
4.4
983,087
18.7
107
2.1
6,300,908
7.0
265,223
5.0
160
3.1
4,018,526
4.5
295,492
5.6
5,148
100.0
89,916,333
100.0
5,266,460
100.0
Source: Foundation Directory-1988
Foundation Center, New York, NY
8
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
- DRAFT -
6. Geographic Distribution - Approximately half of the largest foundations in the nation are
based in the Mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes States. Those foundations held 57.4 percent of the
largest foundations assets and made 53.4 percent of all grant? awarded in the last year of record
(1988). The balance of the larger foundations and most of the growth in the philanthropic
community is located elsewhere. The Pacific West (California to Alaska and Hawaii) follows the
first two regions in total number of foundations, assets and giving and led the nation in the
establishment of new foundations. The West South Central, South Atlantic and greater
midwestern states follow the Pacific West followed in close proximity to total giving. The New
England, Mountain West and East South Central States round out the list with a significant number
of foundations providing generous support to a variety of charitable activities. Reference Table B
provides a brief statistical overview of the nations larger foundations by region and state.
B. Corporate Support
In addition to company-sponsored foundations, many corporations maintain their own
internal corporate giving" or contributions programs. These programs are funded through
percentage set-asides from the annual operating budget of the organization, and as such their funds
fluctuate from year to year contingent on the corporation's profitability. Although the current
number of corporate giving programs is unknown , it is estimated that approximately 25 percent of
all corporations operate such programs. Most of these corporations give approximately 1 percent
of their net earnings before taxes (NEBT), although they are allowed to give up to 10 percent
NEBT under the current federal tax laws.
It is important to note here that corporate giving programs are not necessarily established
for the public's benefit but rather to maintain good relations with the communities that surround
their corporate operations and the consumer communities that purchase their goods and services.
Information on corporate programs is usually excluded from the annual corporate reports but may
be Obtained directly from the public relations or corporate social responsibility offices.
9
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
II. Types of Support
Foundations and corporations support non-profit organizations in their pursuit of charitable
activities through both direct grants and "in-kind" contributions.
A. Direct Support
The three most common types of Direct Suppon are grants awarded to organizations for
capital support, continuing support and program or project support. A brief description of these
and other types of support is provided below:
Capital Support - Often referred to as "Bricks n' Mortar" suppon, these grants establish
endowments and funds for capital improvement projects, such as building construction,
land acquisition, facilities renovation, and equipment purchase.
Continuing Support - These are general puipose grants that are renewed on a regular
(usually annual) basis to be used to maintain the operations of an existing organization or
to capitalize the first few years of a new organization. Monies derived from continuing
suppon grants usually become pan of the organization's operating budget, and as such are
used to cover both administrative and program management costs.
Program Suppon - These are grants provided for a specific program or project. Grants
of this type are usually sought through a program proposal that identifies a specific
problem, a proposed solution and a detailed description of its implementation and overall
budgetary requirements.
In addition to these three basic types of suppon, foundations provide grants to non-profit
organizations for organizational development, technical assistance, public outreach, financial
management, research, education and training.
Organizational Development - Often referred to as "Seed Money" or start-up funding,
this type of suppon enables an organization to establish its initial administrative structure
and programs. A derivative of this type of suppon is the matching or "challenge" grant
which is made to match the funds provided by a previous donor or to challenge a
prospective donor into pledging a contribution to the charitable organization.
10
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
- DRAFT -
Technical Assistance - Some foundations provide grants to non-profit organizations for
management assistance. Such assistance could include program planning, fund-raising,
marketing and general promotion, or legal counsel. Thisjassistance may also be offered as
an in-kind service by foundation personnel.
Public Outreach - Often foundations provide grants to support conferences, symposia
and seminars that aid a non-profit organization in achieving its mission. In addition, many
foundations support the publication of conference proceedings, reports and other
publications that contain the results of foundation funded projects and research.
Financial Management - A variety of grants are available to assist non-profit
organizations in managing their finances. Key among these are grants for deficit financing,
emergency funds, program-related investments and outright loans. Grants made for deficit
financing reduce the recipient's indebtedness on a particular program or project by
providing the balance of needed funding not met through a contribution's campaign. This
so-called "gap" financing can also be used in some instances for mortgage payments.
Emergency funding is usually a one-time grant to cover an immediate budgetary short-fall
that jeopardizes a significant program in a particular year. Program Related Investments
(PRI) are no-to-low interest loans made by a private foundation for a non-profit
organization's project that directly relates to the foundation's mission or program
concentration. These loans are to be repaid within a specified period of time by the
recipients; however, in certain cases of superior program performance, the lender will
forgo the interest.
Research - Certain foundations provide grants for scientific investigations and clinical
trials that fall within their areas of program concentration.
Education and Training - Many foundations provide grants to non-profit organizations
to support fellowships, internships, professorships and a variety of special-purpose
scholarships. Many such special-purpose opportunities focus on natural resources
conservation, wildlife preservation and environmental protection.
1 1
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
1 8
- DRAFT -
B. In-Kind Sunnort
In addition to support through direct grants, many foundations, particularly the corporate
foundations and contribution programs can and do provide significant support to non-profit
organizations through in-kind contributions. Technical assistance and management consulting
services are the most common forms of such support, particularly in program promotion and
budgeting. One unique form of this service is the "loaned executive" arrangement where, in lieu of
a direct cash contribution, a corporation will detail a mid-to-upper level executive to a non-profit
organization as part of their own mid-career development program. Such loans can extend from
six to twelve months and thus become very significant contributions.
Other uniquely corporate forms of in-kind support include donations of the company's
used equipment, product inventory and the use of conference and meeting facilities. All of these
items represent substantial savings to the non-profit organization in administrative expenditures.
Finally, the prudent non-profit organization will seek opportunities to piggy-back the printing of its
promotional materials with the printing of its corporate sponsor's annual repor:. This in-kind
support can result in substantial savings to the non-profit organization, and usually a higher quality
document than it might obtain through a direct expenditure.
1 2
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
1 6
1 7
18
19
20
21
22
23
- DRAFT -
III. Development Process
The key to effectively obtaining philanthropic support for any non-profit environmental
management initiative is in building an effective, working partnership with the potentiaJ donor.
Such a partnership implies a set of similar interests, a common sense of the problems to be
addressed within the interest area, and a compelling set of reasons for your collaboration with the
donor in service to a specific community in need. It is the burden of the non-profit organization to
clearly define the partnership in these terms in both its written and personal appeals for support.
This section of the guide provides a four-phase, systematic process for building on-going
partnerships around the non-profit organization's environmental management initiatives. The first
phase entails clearly defining the organization's mission and methods in what is commonly called
the "case statement". The second phase involves strategic market research to identify prospective
partners/donors within the philanthropic community for the environmental management initiative.
The third phase is one in which appropriate solicitation vehicles are selected for the previously
identified prospects, and a formal campaign is executed to solicit support for the organization's
initiatives. The fourth and final phase entails solidifying new donor support and cultivating the
long-term partnership that should provide the organization with sustained support into the future.
1 3
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
A. The Case Statement
The case statement is a 5 to 10 page document that contains an organization's assessment of
the problem or need that it was created to address, as well as'the organization's goal, objective and
programs/projects it will pursue to ultimately solve the problem or meei the need. In addition, it is
the organization's opportunity to emphasize its unique ability to solve the problem relative to other
potential organizations within the service area. Developing the case statement is an excellent
exercise that all organizations should go through periodically to reinforce the clarity of the mission
internally, as well as to be able to communicate the mission externally to client groups and potential
funders. In regard to the latter audience, the statement will become the central focus of attention in
any formal written proposal submined for funding consideration. Each of the case statement
elements are described below:
1. The Problem - The first element of the case statement should provide a clear understanding
of the problem or need that the non-profit organization hopes to affect in some way. It begins with
a thorough description of the condition that is of concern. Stated in humanistic terms, the
description should identify all of the current or potential victims of the condition, the severity of its
impact; the specific geography affected, the period of time that it has existed and the time it is likely
to exist if unabated, and a description of known causal factors. In drafting the problem
assessment, it is important to avoid indicting references to any individuals or groups and to support
all claims with accurate statistical data and expert testimony. Unsupported claims and speculation
weaken the objectivity of the assessment, and as such should be stricdy avoided. It is also
important to ensure that the problem or need described is one that the organization has the general
capability to address.
For instance, a community-based environmental protection/conservation group could
realistically address a variety' of problems caused by local factors but could not be expected to
realistically address a problem like global warming, which is clearly beyond its scope of
capabilities. Finally, in drafting the assessment there should be a special effort made to avoid the
use of scientific and technical jargon. Nothing is more irritating to the general reader (the average
background of most foundation's staff) than verbiage that requires a textbook to comprehend. The
typical problem/needs assessment is 2 to 3 pages in length with additional appended tables or data
if necessary.
To illustrate the key pieces of the problem assessment, an excerpt of an assessment
developed by a non-profi; environmental organization operating in the Mid-Atlantic is provided
1 4
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
13
14
15
16
1 7
1 S
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
4 1
42
43
44
45
- DRAFT -
below. (Please note that the supporting statistical data and expert testimony has been omitted here
for brevity's sake).
The scope and complexity of the environmental problems facing the Mid-Atlantic
states continue to overwhelm independent public and private efforts to resolve
them. Problems like toxic air emissions, indoor air and radon pollution, coastal
degradation, goundwater and drinking water contamination, and hazardous waste
disposal directly or indirectly affect every individual and community in the region.
They threaten not only public health and the fragile ecology of the Mid-Atlantic but
also our economic vitality andiin turn, our ability to maintain quality of life
comparable with the rest of the nation.
Our inability to solve these problems lies principally in our inability to marshall the
level of resources, capabilities and collective commitment necessary to meet the
problems. This inability is the result of a continuous series of well-intended actions
taken by government, corporate and public interest organizations independently and
often in duplication of one another.
2.) The Goal/Obiecrives - Once the problem has been well-defined, the case statement should
provide a goal that describes an alternative condition that would exist if the component problems
were adequately addressed. This goal is usually stated in a succinct quotable sentence and
accompanied by a set of measurable objectives that the organization will meet to achieve its goal
ever time. Always stated in dynamic terms, the objectives should describe who needs to do what.
how much and bv when. Again, the Mid-Atlantic non-profit environmental organization heretofore
referred to as the "Institute" will serve as our example:
Goal: "Cooperation in environmental management across public and private
organizations within the Mid-Atlantic Region."
Objectives:
1.) The Institute will identify and address at least three complex environmental
problems currently facing the Mid-Atlantic on an annual basis.
2.) The Institute will increase by 1/2 the current level of public involvement in
community wide efforts to combat toxic pollution in the Region's cities within two
years of operation.
3.) The Institute will coordinate public and private environmental management
initiatives to reduce by 1/2 the amount of duplication of services that currently exists
in the Mid-Atlantic within the first three years of operation.
1 5
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
DRAFT
All three of these objectives provide measurable benefits that are expected to accrue from
actions taken by the Institute which, in time, will result in goal attainment. It is important to note
here that the objectives do not state how these measurable benefits are to be achieved, for this is
described separately in the third element of the case statement which is typically referred to as
"methods". The Goal/Objective statement will usually run about a paragraph in length.
3.) The Methods/Programs. This element of the case statement describes in detail how the
objectives and hence the goal will be achieved. Flowing logically from each of the objectives are
one or more programs carefully designed in whole or part to produce the desired benefit for each
objective. The methods element begins with a brief description of the process and rationale used to
arrive at each method or program proposed. The operation of the programs is then described with
special emphasis on how specifically the client group is served and the relative benefits derived
over the costs of program delivery. To support the latter emphasis, it is useful to cite any
previously successful (cost-saving) applications of the program model. The methods section
should also provide specific program performance targets that are expected on an annual time line.
This is particularly important, as many potential funders will want to see evidence of an internal
evaluation component described in the organization's programs. Such targets and evaluation
components enable the funder to track the amount of public service delivery they purchase with
each grant Therefore in order to maintain its competitive edge or strategic position in the market
of service providers it is critical that the organization continually strive to show a high-efficiency
track record in its service delivery. The methods should consume two to three pages.
4.) Strategic Positioning. Once the problem or need has been assessed, an "ideal future state"
is identified, and objectives and specific programs are described, it is time to emphasize the
organization's unique ability to solve the problem or meet the need. The objective of this final
element of the case statement is to drive home the fact that this organization, relative to this
problem, has the qualifications, the angle, and the ability to leverage more service deliver)' for the
grant dollar than other potential providers in the funder's grant-making region. This is a
particularly difficult element to write if the organization has no track record in the program area.
In this case, such an organization will need to rely on "borrowed credibility", that is the relevant
program experience of its Board of Directors or those that it will be working with in implementing
its programs. For those organizations with program experience in the area, this is the appropriate
place to flaunt it, providing emphasis on the direct benefits that others have received from the
organization's efforts within the area. In addition to qualified experience, the organization may
wish to emphasize the unique angle of approach it is proposing, particularly if components of the
approach have been successful elsewhere. For completely new, unproven approaches, the
16
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
organization might stress this as an opportunity for the funder to join into a unique pioneering
partnership that could result in a significant innovation in service delivery. Finally, the
organization should take this opportunity to identify any relevant organizations thai it may choose
to work with in implementing its programs. Assuming that these other organizations have
respectable track records, this provides the primary frrant-seeking organization an opportunity to
expand its credibility, whiie showing a willingness to join others in service to the community
where their own resources are too limited to effectively tackle the challenge independently.
Finally, e\idence of collaboration among non-profit organizations to achieve environmental results
is a movement many government and philanthropic organizations want to encourage. Such
collaboration does reduce duplication of effort, thereby liberating additional funding for more
service deliveiy and larger joint environmental efforts.
In summary, the case statement defines a problem or unmet need, suggests a viable
alternative state where the problem is solved or the need is met, describes what needs to occur and
how in order to achieve the state, and makes clear why the particular organization is best suited to
carry out the proposed mission.
B. Gift Market Research
Once internal clarity is reached and the case statement is developed, the organization must
conduct research to identify those prospective donors likely to sympathize with and support its
mission. This is an absolutely critical component of the development strategy which requires some
degree of effort, but it is not without very substantial rewards.
The process of researching donors begins with the determination of the type of support that
will be sought and the source to be tapped. This is followed by the composition of a donor list and
individual donor profiles. The process continues with the evaluation of the donor prospects and
their stratification into two separate groups, one for more customized attention than the other
during the actual contribution drive. The process concludes with the determination of a feasible
contribution campaign goal and specific targets to be approached when the campaign is enjoined.
Each element is described below:
1.) The Support Mix The type of support an organization will seek and the source of support it
will appeal to will be largely dependent on its state of organizational development and its success in
program performance. Generally, the newly established organization will be looking for start-up
1 7
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
or seed funding to develop itself internally and to develop a set of external programs. Without a
track record in successful program delivery, it will be considered a high-risk applicant for funding
by most foundations. To minimize risks, most foundations avoid requests for seed funding and
those that do provide such support usually do so in small amounts ($500 to $5,000). Corporate
foundations and giving programs are usually the best prospects for this type of funding (again, as
long as there is a clear geographic connection between the proposed activity and the corporation's
community of concern). Some independent foundations provide this type of funding although
again, in smaller, "safer" amounts.
Somewhat less difficult to obtain is program support. Independent, coiporate and
community foundations are likely to provide newly established organizations program support if
the proposed programs are clearly laid out, have a visible recipient population-in-need and if there
is some indication that the new organization will be successful in executing the program (i.e.,
borrowed credibility). All three of these prerequisites should be satisfied by the well-written case
statement discussed above. Finally, the newly established organization will find itself beyond the
reach of operating and capital support but well within the reach of a whole host of in-kind support.
Here again, the corporate funders can provide substantial support from used equipment to direct
staff assistance.
The more established organizations with strong records of program performance will find
program, operating, and capital support far easier to obtain. Here again, the inverse relationship
between risk and the amount of support available plays out - the more established an organization,
the less the risk to the funder and the higher the level of support This relationship achieves its
ultimate expression in the "mature" well-established organizations that mount very effective
program, operating, and capital support campaigns simultaneously each year. However, it is
worth emphasizing again that practically all successful non-profit fund raising efforts, large or
small, new or mature, rely on and are funded by a compelling case statement
2.) Donor Identification. Once the appropriate support mix is determined, prospective donors
are identified through a number of key data sources on foundations and coiporate giving programs.
Foundation Data Sources. For research on foundations, there is no better source of information
than the Foundation Center and its valuable publications. Although based in New York Gty, the
Center has a national network of cooperating collections and four major regional centers, housing a
complete set of their publications for the nation. Reference # B contains a list of these centers and
their phone numbers.
1 8
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
1 7
1 8
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
The foundation centers premier publication for foundation research is the "Foundation
Directory". The director)' is a biannual publication that provides information on the finances,
governance, and grant-making interests of the 5,000 or so largest foundations in the United States.
Although these foundations represent only 20 percent of all foundations in existence, they hold 97
percent of all private foundation assets and make 92 percent of all grants awarded each year. The
biannual directory is kept current during the intervening year by a supplemental publication that
contains updated information on the foundations in transition during that period.
In addition to the directory and its supplement, the Foundation Center produces what it
calls its "Comsearch Printouts" for a variety of charitable subject areas. For our purposes, the
Comsearch entitled "Grants for Environmental Law, Protection, and Education" is most valuable.
This annual publication contains all of the grants made to non-profit organizations in the United
States and abroad for the title subjects and contains extremely useful indices to grants by recipient
name, location, environment subject matter, and by the awarding (or grant-making) foundations.
It should be noted here that the indices of all the Foundation Center's publications allow the
researcher to identify potential foundation supporters first by subject, then by type of support
typically given and then by geographic giving area. Once a set of foundations is identified through
the index sequence, more detailed information on each foundation prospect can be obtained
through the Foundation Center's "Source Book Profiles". The profiles combine, information from
the Directory with information derived from annual reports and actual grants lists to form a
complete picture of the target foundation and its giving patterns.
Comparable to the Foundation Center's "Source Book Profiles" is the Taft Corporation's
"Foundation Reporter". This publication provides the depth of coverage the Foundation Director)'
provides but goes even further by providing biographical information on the officers and trustees
of the major foundations. Although the Foundation Center and Taft publications are the primary
sources of information on foundations, there are several other sources available through the
network of cooperating collections listed in Reference B.
Corporation Data Sources. Once again, the Foundation Center and Taft organizations dominate the
data trade on corporate philanthropy. The Foundation Center's "Corporate Foundation Profiles"
and Tafts' "Corporate Giving Directory" provide profiles on the largest corporate foundations and
giving programs. Again, the organizations' history, current governance, and biographical
information are contained in these volumes which are largely equivalent. An additional source of
information on the corporate side of philanthropy is available in the Public Management Institute's
1 9
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
) 1
1 2
13
14
15
16
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
(PMI) "Corporate 500 Directory of Corporate Philanthropy". Like the previous publications, the
PMI director)' provides an exhaustive background on the larger corporate giving programs fully
indexed by geographic region and subject matter.
Finally, detailed grant-making information on all private independent or corporate
foundations can be obtained through the Internal Revenue Service's collection of PF-990s. The
PF (private foundation)-990 is the annual financial reporting form required of all foundations by
the IRS. The form contains information on the foundations total contributions and gifts received;
gross income and expenditures; names, addresses and phone numbers of its managei-s; assets;
liabilities; net worth; and most importantly of all, its grants by recipient, purpose, and total amount
for the year. A complete set of PF-990s for all foundations is maintained by the Foundation
Center s New York and Washington offices and are available for viewing and photocopying
during regular business hours. Limited collections of PF-990s (usually containing foundation PF-
990s for just one state) are also available for public review at the institutions listed in Reference
Document B.
3.) Donor Evaluation. Once the appropriate mix of support and specific sources are selected,
the non-profit researcher should construct a profile on each prospective donor. Each profile should
contain the following important data found in the sources above: donor's formal (legal) name,
address, phone, fax and contact persons; total assets; annual administrative expenditures and net
earnings before taxes; total employees and plant locations (coiporates only); three-year grant
history (high, low, and average grant amounts); and professed or potential areas of environmental
interests. For the large gift market research effort (researching 100 .or more prospects), it is highly
advisable to enter this information into a "dBase" file which will allow automated indexing and data
manipulation. Although most of this data should be available in the reference directories described
above, it may be necessary to secure the annual report directly from the prospective donor.
Whether necessary to fill out the data or not, it is a good practice to secure the annual report and
any other material available from the donor for each profile constructed.
Next, each prospective donor is evaluated for its "giving potential" and general salience for
the environmental management initiative being contemplated. The three-year grant history is
particularly useful here as are the foundation's annual reports. The key objective here is to identify
the average grant amount that the donor has provided in the past to similar initiatives. The national
directories mentioned earlier do provide the average grant and the grant range for most foundations;
however, in some cases, it may be necessary to calculate it from the grants lists for the foundation.
Once the average grant amounts have been established, the research should set an "average grant
20
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
13
14
15
16
1 7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
threshold" below which a donor prospect would be considered a "general prospect", and above the
threshold a "major prospe ct". (The average threshold for most medium-sized development
campaigns is $10,000.) This process of stratifying the donor pool into two groups enables the
non-profit organization to develop a more customized appeal"to those foundations likely (based on
the grant history) to give larger dollar amounts. Within the private fund development field, it has
been statistically established that only 20 percent of the donor prospects under consideration for
any project will contribute 80 percent of the needed funding for an initiative. Conversely, 80
percent of the donor prospects will collectively contribute approximately 20 percent of the needed
funding. Therefore, it is most cost-efficient to place more energy into cultivating the "significant
few than the important many" as will be discussed in the next section of the guide.
4.) The Campaign Goal. Once the gift market research and evaluation are complete, a
preliminary campaign goal is established around which the formal development campaign will
revolve. The campaign goal (a specific dollar amount), is arrived at by calculating the statistical
average of all average grants given by each donor prospect being considered, multiplied by the total
number of donors, and the probability factor of success in a first-time development campaign
(approximately 0.15). Of course, the campaign goal will be subject to change as additional
prospects are identified or as the donor evaluation eliminates prospects from further consideration.
C. Camnaign Structure and Execution
In order to reach the campaign goal, the non-profit organization must structure and execute
a well-devised plan of action, customized to appeal to the interests of its specific pool of
prospective donors. Such a plan should provide: a set of realistic (relative to the estimated support
available) program/project budgets for its initiative; a set of appropriate solicitation vehicles for its
major and general donor prospects; a timeline or action schedule for its campaign, and follow-
through activities to secure campaign pledges.
1.) Program Budgets. Next to the case statement, the program budget is the most important
document to submit to a potential funder. It is an expression of how well the program proposal
has been thought out, and it is an opportunity for a potential funder to see how his/her investment
will be spent. Most foundations and corporations request three budget documents with each
proposal: The first is the actual project/program budget (revenue and expenses), the second is an
organization budget for the current operating year, and the third is an independently audited
financial statement from the most recent fiscal year. In addition, many foundations request a list of
21
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
- DRAFT -
other funding sources to which the application or proposal has been submitted and the results of
those submissions.
There are many formats available and fully acceptably for expressing an organization's
budget to a prospective donor. Most should cover personnel costs and non-personnel costs, and
where appropriate, any direct costs that a funding source may allow.
a.) Personnel. Most personnel components cover salaries and wages, fringe benefits,
and consultants and contract services. Salaries are typically shown by listing the number of
persons in each job tide series, the monthly salary attached to the position, and the percentage of
time that person is working on the proposed program multiplied by the number of months they will
work on the program. The totals for each position are then entered as a line item across three
columns: one for total program costs, one for the grant amount being requested, and one for the
amount expected to be donated by other funding sources. Fringe benefits are typically entered into
the budget under three line item headings: mandated benefits (e.g., workers compensation
insurance, unemployment insurance, etc.), Social Security (FICA), and voluntary benefits (e.g.,
medical, dental, life insurance, etc.). Consultants and contract services are shown in the budget as
they relate to the outside professional services that support the program mission.
b.) Non-Personnel Costs. These costs usually include office space, utilities, facilities
maintenance, rentals, leased items or equipment, supplies, travel, telephone and "other costs"
(e.g., postage insurance, etc.). Entries for each of these items should be as specific as possible
and should provide narrative rationale where appropriate to support the expenditure.
c.) Indirect Costs. These are costs that most non-profit organizations must meet to stay
in operation, in general, unavoidable overhead. Such costs are rarely identifiable with the
program being proposed but, if within reason, are generally accepted by funders as the non-profit
organization's "cost of doing business." Indirect costs are usually expressed as a percentage of the
total program budget or as a percentage of one or more line items. Prior to completing the budget,
clarification of indirect costs should be established with each prospective donor.
Finally, each detailed budget should be accompanied by a budget summary that gives the
major line item totals under the Personnel and Non-Personnel categories. Here again, three
columns should be used to show the total dollar amount of each line item for the total program, for
die total grant requested, and for the total of "other" donations received. Reference Document C
22
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
1 8
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
contains a sample budget and budget summary to further illustrate the typical budget components
and structure.
2.) Solicitation Vehicles - There are a variety of solicitation vehicles typically used during
development campaigns, such as direct mail, telephone appeals, special events, payroll deduction
campaigns, to name only a few. But from a cost efficiency standpoint, there are no better vehicles
than the personal appeal and the written grant request
The personal appeal is perhaps the most effective of all solicitation vehicles because it
involves the most tailored contact with the prospective donor ~ the face to face discussion. It
provides the funder an opportunity to interact with the recipient over particulars of the proposed
initiative and to get a "feel" for the organization's leadership. The personal appeal is typically
conducted by a member of the Board of Directors and/or by the organization's Executive Director.
It is essentially an oral presentation of the case statement and an offer to the prospective donor to
become a partner in the initiative. The personal appeal requires a significant amount of staff
preparation to be effectively executed. Such preparation includes the composition of an
abbreviated version of the case statement that is suitable for an oral presentation and a set of
donor-specific (relevant) talking points to be used by a board member during the discussion with
the donor. In addition, the staff must prepare pre-meeting correspondence requesting the meeting
and then confirming it, and follow-up (post-meeting) correspondence thanking the donor for the
opportunity to discuss the proposed initiative.
In addition to staff time, the personal appeal requires some time of the organization's
Board of Directors. To be specific, approximately 3 houis are required per donor visit, including
30 minutes to 1 hour of pre-briefing prior to the visit The most important element of the pre-brief
and the actual discussion is the specific request for assistance that will be made to the donor. This
is the point where the gift market research conducted earlier will play an essential role, for through
the research the organization will have determined the specific donor interest that the oral
presentation will need to appeal to and a reasonable level of assistance to request for the initiative.
Since the personal appeal is a relatively time-consuming solicitation vehicle, it is best to restrict its
use to major donor prospects (that 20 percent of all donors likely to provide 80 percent of the
assistance needed for the initiative).
For the remaining "general" donors identified as potential supporters for the initiative, this
primer recommends the use of the formal written grant request or program proposal. Although
some donors will have specific grant applications for prospective recipients to use, most will
23
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
1 8
19
20
: 1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
- DRAFT -
provide only general guidance in the preparation of an adequate proposal. To ensure that the
organization satisfies the full range of possible application requiren. it is recommended that the
following components be included in any and all .vritten request for assistance: a cover letter
summarizing the organization's mission/programs and the specific type and level of support
requested (signed by the Chairman of the Board or other authorized officer); a brief capabilities
statement; a fully detailed and documented case statement with an executive summary (1 1/2 pages
maximum) customized to each donor's interests; a specific set of program and operating budgets
and the organizations most recent fiscal audit; the organizations Federal/State Form-990 for the
previous year, a list of previous donors and current prospects; a list of the current Board of
Directors; and finally, proof of the organization's 501 (C)(3) status (i.e: the IRS certificate of tax
exemption).
Here again, adequate gift market research will reveal any additional requirements that a
particular donor may have of a prospective recipient. In certain cases, the full proposal just
described may not be required or even desired by a donor. In its place, a donor may request a
"pre-proposal letter" of 1 to 2 pages that describes the basic problem and the plan for its solution.
Even in such a brief format,the organization should include project objectives, logistics, a time
schedule, personnel, and financial resources available and sought. Where a request of this nature
is made, it is also typically an indication that a personal appeal or visit would be inappropriate until
the prospective donor has privately evaluated the initiative's linkage with its interests. If the pre-
proposal letter does coincide with the donor's interests, they will usually request either a
conference and or a full proposal to be submitted.
3.) Campaign Schedules - Most foundations and corporate giving programs have specific
periods of time each year that they consider new proposals for assistance. These periods are
usually revealed in the annual reports and in some of the national foundation directories. It is
important to respect these time periods and to meet all published deadlines for submissions. Where
these time periods are not spelled out in the institution's publications, a phone call should be made
for clarification. Where no specific deadlines exist, an effort should be made to determine when
the institution's board meetings take place and/or when its budget is composed for the coming
fiscal year. For most organizations, this period is usually in the Spring and or Summer, prior to
the beginning of the fiscal year (January 1). As a general rule the larger independent foundations
meet to consider proposed initiatives biannually in mid-winter and mid-summer and in some cases
quarterly. Small foundations and most corporate giving programs consider proposals only once a
year and again, usually in conjunction with the budget process. As program-based relationships
24
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
with donors develop over time, the non-profit environmental organization should be able to
synchronize its own budgeting process in relation to its primary sources of support.
4.) Follow-Through - An element that is absolutely critical to the ultimate success of any major
or general development campaign is adequate follow-through. In the case of the majors effon, a
follow-up letter of thanks should be sent after each personal appeal conference. The letter should
reiterate the main points made during the presentation and the invitation to participate as a partner in
the effort through the specified donation. It should always be signed by the principal board
member that made the visit and offer any additional clarification on the initiative and the assistance
request that might be necessary. In some cases, major prospects follow-through may also include
a personal phone call by a board member to the donor if a strong personal rapport developed
during the initial visit.
Follow-through for the general grant application effort should include post-application
correspondence (only after the published donor consideration period) and/or phone calls to
foundation or coiporate staff to determine the funding status of the initiative. In the case of
rejection, an effort should be made to determine why the initiative was not funded. An explanation
provided by the donor is valuable information that can significantly improve the organization's next
application. In either case, funding or rejection, the non-profit organization should be sure that
positive, constructive follow-through occurs with each donor to cap-off the well executed
development campaign.
D. Sustaining Partnerships
Once the campaign contributions begin to materialize, it is necessary to recognize donor
assistance provided for the specific environmental initiative and to build upon the new partnership
for future environmental initiatives.
1.) Donor Recognition - When donations are received, it is absolutely critical to provide
immediate recognition of the gift through a formal thank-you note from the Chairman of the Board.
This should be followed by full recognition of the assistance in any published materials the
organization produces relative to the programs/projects supported by the donors. In addition, all
donors for a particular operating year should be recognized in the annual report and listed a;
previous donors in succeeding annual reports. Finally, should the organization sponsor any
seminars, lectures, conferences or any special events, all previous donors should receive priority
invitations and complimentary admission.
25
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
1 8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
- DRAFT -
2.) Program Evaluation - In order to build an ongoing partnership with a donor around a
particular initiative, it is necessary to show the donor how effectively the organization has used the
contribution, in short, to show that the funded initiative has made a difference. To prove this latter
i
point, the organization must design and implement a program evaluation process. There are
usually two basic components to a program evaluation - one that focuses on the initiatives and
products and one that examines the process of its implementation.
The product evaluation should be designed to show the extent to which the program
achieved the objectives contained in the case statement. The reader will recall that each of these
objectives was stated in measurable terms of success, thereby providing a general target against
which each program element can be judged. The full product evaluation establishes how progress
towards the objective target will be assessed. Specifically it determines what type of data will be
gathered for each objective, what specific measure within each type will be sought and how the
data will be collected.
The process evaluation should be designed to determine how consistent the program was
implemented with the original plan, and how effective each program element or activity was in
regard to the program's overall effectiveness. The process evaluation, in contrast to the program
evaluation, is necessarily qualitative in construct And although qualitative, the process evaluation
should specify its general criteria for assessing the effectiveness of specific program elements. The
format used for the process evaluation is typically narrative, while the program evaluation tends to
be more numerical. It is recommended that the non-profit environmental organization formalize its
intent to conduct the product and process evaluations by including the written evaluation design in
its original proposal submitted to prospective donors. This should lend more reinforcement to the
notion that the non-profit organization intends to be a fully responsible service provider, and thus
will provide a better return on the philanthropic institution's charitable investment
3.) Future Initiatives - One long-term objective common to all non-profit environmental
organizations is continued progress toward their environmental goals. In order to maintain
progress, these organizations must continue to develop new initiatives and sustained philanthropic
support to implement them. Their ability to secure this support will depend in large measure on the
strength of the partnerships they are able to forge with the donor community. Toward this end, it
is suggested that non-profit organizations strive to understand as much as possible about their
partners' substantive interests, conventions and specific program needs. Through the type of
research described earlier, non-profit organizations can identify potential partners that closely align
26
-------
- DRAFT -
1 with their own interests and program aspirations. In time, through a succession of program
2 specific relationships, partnerships will begin to form, enabling the development of jointly
3 designed initiatives that maximize the perspectives, knowledge, talent and resources of donors and
4 non-profit organizations to create a new generation of philanthropic programs for the environment.
27
-------
- DRAFT -
1 IV. Reference
2
3 A. Fiscal Data of Foundations by Region and S,tate
4
5 B. Foundation Center Cooperating Collections Network
6
7 C. Sample Budget
8
9 D. Alphabetical List of Foundations
28
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1 3
14
15
- DRAFT -
Reference Document A
Fiscal Data of Foundations by Region
and State
29
-------
TABLE 4. FISCAL DATA OF FOUNDATIONS BV REGION AND STATE (All dollar figures expressed in thousands)
INTRODUCTION
Middle Atlantic 1,760 26.6 $ 37,321,871 34.9 $ 873,013 23.5 >2,459,354 33.7 $2,149,140 33.9
New Jersey 186 3,714,958 87,010 271,639 249,778
New York 1,219 25.334.787 587,519 1,653.620 1,414,296
Pennsylvania 355 8,274,126 198,484 534,094 485,066
East North Central 1,256 19.0 22,7^5,740 21.2 625,167 16.9 1,447,733 19.8 1,297,529 2P.5
Illinois 414 6.944,141 19i.264 490.727 435,358
Indiana 106 3,070,674 92,145 N 147^827 12^669
Michigan 222 7,661,877 96,712 413,953 388,031
Ohio 370 3,956.560 196,976 302,214 261 455
Wisconsin 144 1,082,488 46,069 93,012 85^016
Pacific 753 11.4 14,698,904 13.7 584,389 1S.8 887,797 12.2
Alaska
762,218 12.0
736
643,892
Oregon 42 484,895 11326 39^514 Js'SsO
Washington 92 694,856 30,936 61,280 71J45
California
Hawaii
Weft South Central
Arkansas
Louisiana
Oklahoma
Texas
South Atlantic
Delaware „ /is.az/ 6,942 45,690 35 411
District of Columbia 81 1,221,594 76,274 98.859 68 671
F'or'da 218 1,604,385 207,054 150,488 127 241
Ccor?,aJ 140 1,487,049 50,305 113,887 105*244
Maryland 119 1,183,889 243,600 87,289 77'l83
NorthCarotna 123 2,261,805 66,136 158,223 127 364
South Carolina 45 245 00S mooo mnon
Virginia
West Virginia
/est North Central
Iowa
New England
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Mountain
Arizona
Montana
vto Rico
Total
Noie: Figunt rrviy not add up due to rounding.
Number of
Gifts
Foundations
Percent
Assets
Percent
Received
Percent
Expenditures
1,760
26.6
$ 37,323,871
34.9
$ 873,013
23.5
>2,459,354
186
3,714,958
87,010
271,639
1,219
25.334.787
587,519
1,653.620
355
8,274,126
198,484
534,094
1,256
19.0
22,7^5,740
21.2
625,167
16.9
1,447,733
414
6.944,141
19 i.264
490.727
106
3,070.674
92,145
\
147,827
222
7,661,877
96,712
413,953
370
3,956.560
196,976
302,214
144
1,082,488
46,069
93,012
753
11.4
14,698,904
13.7
584,389
15.8
887,797
4
4,502
921
1,008
588
13,290,310
533,471
771,966
27
224,341
7,235
14,029
42
484,895
11,826
39,514
92
694,856
30,936
61,280
550
8.3
8,756,461
8.2
196,618
S.3
619,684
31
233,854
15.581
28,530
60
327,067
15,588
19,116
75
1,587,263
16,559
90,932
384
6,608,277
148,890
481,106
906
13.7
10,055,918
9.4
685,912
18.5
772,173
54
715,427
6.942
45,690
81
1,221,594
76,274
98,859
218
1,604,385
207,054
150,488
140
1,487,049
50,305
113,887
119
1,183,889
243,600
87,289
123
2,261,805
66,136
158,223
45
242,005
10,999
19,080
107
1,242,187
22,264
90,511
19
97,577
2,338
8,146
480
73
5,376,743
5.0
334,222
9.0
486,518
50
408,3C0
33,873
23,486
58
270,037
9,287
21,867
153
2,865,683
154,637
239,285
164
1,465,155
119,427
167,226
44
339,758
16,349
31,697
8
21,213
287
2,435
3
6,597
363
523
543
8.2
4,686,577
4.4
251,359
6.8
374,125
155
1,674,328
96,555
166,498
13
39,679
3,102
3,850
302
2,261,423
129,292
150,559
25
157,728
5,922
11,002
40
489,245
15,764
38,022
8
64,175
725
4,194
200
3.0
2,148,408
2.0
108,403
2.9
141,662
30
396,292
27,932
25,520
63
1,079,466
13,148
80,365
9
30.245
1,536
2,808
9
42,198
2,060
2,602
19
204,035
15,557
11,276
11
127,822
2,690
4,828
28
217,070
44,797
11,544
11
51,281
683
2,718
165
2.5
1,171,118
1.1
48,452
1.3
115,329
50
224,634
11,406
16,207
29
317,224
18,955
34,629
16
63,587
1,731
4,495
70
5b5,673
16,360
59,998
2
0.0
6,206
0.0
2,625
0.1
1,655
6,615
100.0
$106,939,947
100.C
53,710,160
100.0
$7,306,030
T< tal
Percent Giving Percent
8.5 498,161 7.9
26,680
15,397
68,481
387,602
10.6 638,983 10.1
16,625
74,499
6,743
6.7 435,368 6.9
„ 400,3C0 33,873 23,486 21 044
Ka.nsas 58 270.037 9,287 21,867 19'">14
Minnesota 153 2,865,683 154,637 239,285 209*949
J^'?sou[l 164 1,465,155 119,427 167,226 155 221
w««r|?n\ . 4o 339,758 16,349 31,697 27,801
North Dakota 8 21,213 287 2 435 1 846
South Dakota 3 a cq? tl->
294
5.1 340,696 5.4
1,674,328 96,555 166,498 150 585
Maine 13 *70 nm ,
3,327
u k- ,r AZbl,4Z3 129,292 150,559 141,435
Ph^liT^ " '57,728 5,922 11,002 8 890
Rhode Island 40 489,245 15,764 38,022 34 294
Vermont 8 M 17* 7-xl ...
2,164
1.9 120,052 1.9
r«?n«w f, 27,932 25,520 20 417
S?ho 81 1,079,466 13,148 80,365 68,562
«"hO 9 10 ->Af. i -> >r.D ...7
2,516
Nevada ,1 42,198 2,060 2,602 2,306
^adj . 19 204,035 15,557 11,276 9,963
K 11 127,822 2,690 4,828
",ah . 28 217,070 44,797 11,544 9 882
Wyoming 11 51,281 683 2.718 2.'395
CiI,AlSJj?,,,ral ™ «M52 1J 115,329 1.6 99,306 1.6
KwSdfv « 224,634 11,406 16,207 14-967
Kentucky 29 317,224 18,955 34,629 28 S'3
« «.SB7 ,>3, MS Mj]
70 CkC I/. lin rn Ana ».
51,993
0.0 1,042 0.0
THE FOUNDATION DIRECTORY
t-c
J^ir<
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
13
14
15
- DRAFT -
Reference Document B
Foundation Center Cooperating
Collections Network
3 1
-------
THE FOUNDATION CENTER COOPEPATING COLLECTIONS NETWORK
Free Funding Information Centers
Foundation Center publications on foundation and corporate giving are available for public use at the Center's four
libraries and at Cooperating Collections in every state.
You will find these publications:
Corporate Giving Directory
Tht Foundation Directory
The Foundation Directory Supplement
The Foundation Grantt Indax
Foundation Cranta Indax Bimonthly
Sou re* Book Profiles
National Dau Boo¦ ot Foundation»
Foundation Fundamantali
Foundation Granta to IndMduala
Center libraries and many Collections also have information or. fundraising and nonprofit management. A complete
set of IRS 990-Privale Foundation returns can be found at Center libraries in New York and Washington. Cleveland and San
Francisco have sets for the Midwest and West respectively. Collections which have 990-PFs for their state are indicated by (e).
Alabama
• Birmingham Public Library
2100 Park Place
Birmingham 35203
205-226-3600
Huntsville Public Library
915 Monroe St
Huntsville 35801
205-532-5940
University of South Alabama
Library Reference Dept.
Mobile 36688
205-460-7025
• Auburn University at
Montgomery Library
1-85 @ Taylor Rd.
Montgomery 36193-0401
205-271-9649
Alaska
Juneau Public Library
242 Marine Way
Juneau 99801
907-586-5249
• University of Alaska
Anchorage Library
3211 Providence Drive
Anchorage 99508
907-786-1848
Arizona
• Phoenix Public Library
Business & Sciences Dept
12 East McDowell Road
Phoenix 85257
602-262-4636
• Tucson Public Library
200 South Sixth Avenue
Tucson 85726-7470
602-791-4393
Arkansas
• Westark Community College
Library
5210 Grand Avenue
Fort Smith 72913
501-785-7000
• Central Arkansas Library System
Reference Services
700 Louisiana r'reet
Little Rock 7220^
501-370-5950
California
• California Community Foundation
Funding Information Center
3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1660
Los Angeles 90010
213-413-4042
• Community Foundation for
Monterey County
420 Pacific Street
Monterey 93940
408-375-9712
California Community
Foundation
13252 Garden Grove Blvd.
Garden Grove 92643
714-750-7794
Riverside Public Library
3581 7th Street
Riverside 92501
714-782-5201
California State Library
Reference Services, Rm. 309
914 Capital Mall
Sacramento 95667
916-322-4570
• San Diego Community
Foundation
525 "B" Street, Suite 410
San Diego 92101
619-239-8815
• The Foundation Center
312 Sutter Street, Room 312
San Francisco 94108
415-397-0902
• Grantsmanship Resource Center
1762 Technology Dr, Suite 225
San Jose 95110
408-452-8181
• Orange County Community
Developmental Council
1695 W. MacArthur Blvd.
Costa Mesa 92626
714-540-9293
• Peninsula Community
Foundation
1204 Burlingame Avenue
Buriingame 94011-0627
415-342-2505
• Santa Barbara Public Library
40 East Anaparnu
Santa Barbara 93102
805-962-7653
Santa Monica Public Library
1343 Sixth Street
Santa Monica 90401-1603
213-451-8859
Tuolumne County Free Library
480 Greenley Rd.
Sonora 95370
209-533-5507
Colorado
Pikes Peak Library District
20 North Cascade Avenue
Colorado Springs 80901
719-473-2080
• Denver Public Library
Sociology Division
1357 Broadway
Denver 80203
303-571-2190
Connecticut
Danbury Public Library
170 Main Street
Danbury 06810
203-797-4527
• Hartford Public Library
Reference Department
500 Main Street
Hartford 06103
203-293-6000
DATA.
25 Science Park
Suite 502
New Haven 06511
203-786-5225
Delaware
• University of Delaware
Hugh Morris Library
Newark 19717-5267
302-451-2965
District of Columbia
• The Foundation Center
1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington 20036
202-331-1400
Florida
Volusia County Library Center
City Island
Davton.- Beach 32014-446'
904-25: -3765
• Jacksonville Public Libraries
Business, Science & Documents
122 North Ocean Street
Jacksonville 32206
904-630-2665
• Miami-Dade Public Library
Humanities Department
101 W. Flaglc St
Miami 3313C
305-375-2665
• Orange County Library System
101 E. Central Blvd.
Orlando 32801
407-425-4694
Selby Public Library
1001 Boulevard of the Arts
Sarasota 33577
613-951-5501
• Leon County Public Library
Funding Resource Center
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee 32303
904-487-2665
Palm Beach County Community
Foundation
324 Datura Stree', Suite 340
West Palm Beach 33401
407-659-6800
Georgia
• Atlanta-Fulton Public Library
tvan Allen Department
1 Margaret Mitchell Square
Atlanta 30303-1089
404-688-4636
Hawaii
• University of Hawaii
Thomas Hale Hamilton Library
2SS0 The Mall
Honolulu 96822
808-948-7214
Hawaiian Community
Foundation
Hawaii Resource Room
212 Merchant Street
Sui'e 330
Hrnolulu 96813
806-599-57o7
Idaho
• Boise Public Library
715 S. CaDitol Blvd.
Boise 83702
-------
Caldwell Public library
1010 Dearborn Street
Caldwell 83605
206-459-3242
Illinois
Belleville Public Library
121 East Washington Street
Belleville 62220
618-234-0441
DuPage Township
241 Canterbury Lane
Bolingbrook 60439
312-759-1317
Donor* Forum of Chicago
53 W. Jackson Btvd, Rm. 430
Chicago 60604
312-431-0265
Evanston Public Library
1703 Orrington Avenue
Evanston 60201
312-866-0305
Sangamon State University
LBxary
Shepherd Road
Springfield 62794-9243
217-786-6633
Indiana
Allen County Public Library
900 Webster Street
Fort Wayne 46802
219-424-7241
Indiana University Northwest
Library
3400 Broadway
Cary 46408
219-980-6580
Indianapolis-Marion County
Public Library
40 Last Sl Clair Street
Indianapolis 46206
317-269-1733
Iowa
Public Library of Des Moines
100 Locust Street
Des Moines 50308
515-283-4259
Kansas
Topeka Public Library
1515 West Tenth Street
Topeka 66604
913-233-2040
Wichita Public Library
223 South Main
Wichita 67202
316-262-0611
Kentucky
Western Kentucky University
Helm-Cravens Library
Bowling Green 42101
502-745-6125
Louisville Free Public Library
Fourth and York Streets
Louisville 40203
502-561*8600
Louisiana
• East Baton Rouge Parish Library
Centroplex Branch
120 Sl Louis Street
Baton Rouge 70802
504-389-4960
• New Orleans Public Library
Business and Science Division
219 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans 70140
504-596-2583
• Shreve Memorial Library
424 Texas Street
Shreveport 71120-1523
318-226-5894
Maine
• University of Southern Maine
Office of Sponsored Research
246 Deering Ave, Rm. 628
Portland 04103
207-780-4871
Maryland
• Enoch Pratt Free library
Social Science and History
Department
400 Cathedral Street
Baltimore 21201
301-396-5320
Massachusetts
• Associated Grantmakers of
Massachusetts
294 Washington Street
Suite 840
Boston 02108
617-426-2608
• Boston Public Library
666 Boytaon Sl
Boston 02117
617-536-5400
• Western Massachusetts Funding
Resource Center
Campaign for Human
Development
73 Chestnut Street
Springfield 01103
413-732-3175
• Grants Resource Center
Worcester Public Library
Salem Square
Worcester 01608
508-799-1655
Michigan
• Alpena County Library
*211 North First Avenue
Alpena 49707
517-356-6188
University of Michigan-Ann
Arbor
209 Hatcher Graduate Library
Ann Arbor 48109-1205
313-764-1149
• Henry Ford Centennial Library
16301 Michigan Avenue
Dearborn 48126
313-943-2337
• Wayne State University
Purdy-Kresge Library
Detroit 48202
313-577-4040
• Michigan Stale University
Libraries
Reference Library
East Lansing 48824-1048
517-353-8818
• Farmington Community Library
32737 West 12 Mile Road
Farmington Hills 48018
313-553-0300
• University of Michigan-Flint
library .
Reference Department
Flint 46502-2186
313-762-3408
• Grand Rapids Public library
Business Dept.
60 Library Plaza
Grand Rapids 49503
616-456-3600
• Michigan Technological
University Library
Highway U.S. 41
Houghton 49931
906-487-2507
• Sauh Ste. Marie Area
Public Schools
Office of Compensatory
Education
460 W. Spruce Sl
Sauit Ste. Marie 49783-1874
906-635-6619
Minnesota
• Duluth Public Library
520 W. Superior Street
Duluth 55802
218-723-3802
• Southwest State University
library
Marshall 56258
507-537-7278
• Minneapolis Public library
Sociology Department
300 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis 55401
612-372-6555
Rochester Public Library
11 First Street. SE
Rochester 55902-3743
507-285-8002
Sl. Paul Public library
90 West Fourth Street
Saint Paul 55102
612-292-6307
Mississippi
(ackson Metropolitan Library
301 North State Street
Jackson 39212
601-968-5803
Missouri
• Clearinghouse for Midcontinent
Foundations
Univ. of Missouri
Law School. Suite 1-300
52nd Street and Oak
Kansas Chy (>4113-0680
816-276-1176
• Kansas City Public Library
311 East 12th Street
Kansas City 64106
816-221-9650
• Metropolitan Association for
Philanthropy. Inc.
5585 Pershing Avenue
Suite 150
St. Louis 63112
314-361-3900
• Springfielo-Greene County
library
397 East Central Street
Springfield 65801
417-866-4636
Montana
• Eastern Montana College Library
1500 N. 30th Street
Billings 59101-0298
406-657-1662
• Montana St?te Library
Reference Department
1515 E. 6th Avenue
Helena 59620
406-444-3004
Nebraska
• University of Nebraska
106 Love Library
14th & R Streets
Lincoln 68588-0410
402-472-2848
• W. Dale Clark Library
Social Sciences Department
215 South 15th Street
Omaha 68102
402-444-4826
Nevada
• Las Vegas-Clark County Library
District
1401 Eas' Flamingo Road
Us Vegas 89119-6160
702-733-7810
• Washoe County Library
301 South Center Street
Reno 89501
702-785-4012
New Hampshire
• New Hampshire Charitable Fund
One South Street
Concord 03301
603-225-6641
Littleton Public Library
109 Main Street
Littleton 03561
603-444-5741
New Jersey
Cumberland County Library
800 E. Commerce Street
Bridgeton 08302-2295
609-453-2210
The Support Center
17 Academy Street. Suite 1101
Newark 07102
201-643-5774
-------
County College of Morris
Masten Learning Resource
Center
Route 10 and Center Grove Rd.
Randolph 07869
201-361-5000 ext 470
• New Jersey State Library
Governmental Reference
185 West Slate Street
Trenton 08625
609-292-6220
New Mexico
Albuquerque Community
Foundation
6400 Uptown Boulevard N.E.
Suite 500-W
Albuquerque 87105
505-883-6240
• New Mexico State Library
325 Don Caspar Street
Santa Fe 87505
505-827-3824
New York
• New York State Library
Cultural Education Center
Humanities Section
Empire State Plaza
Albany 12230
518-474-5161
New York Public Library
Bronx Reference Center
2556 Bainbridge Avenue
Bronx 10458
212-220-6575
Brooklyn in Touch
One Hanson Place
Room 2504
Brooklyn 11243
718-230-3200
• Buffalo and Erie County Public
Library
Lafayette Square
Buffalo 14202
716-846-7103
Huntington Public Library
338 Main Street
Huntington 11743
516-427-5165
• Levittown Public Library
One Bluegrass Lane
Levittown 11756
516-731-5720
• The Foundation Center
79 Fifth Avenue
New York 10003
212-620-4230
SUNY/College at Old Westbury
Library
223 Store Hill Road
Old Westbury 11568
516-876-3156
• Plattsburgh Public Library
15 Oak Street
Piattsburgh 12901
518-563-0921
Adriance Memorial Library
93 Market Street
Poughkeepsie 12601
914-485-3445
Queens Borough Public Library
89-11 Merrick Boulevard
Jamaica 11432
718-990-0700
• Rochester Public Library
Business Division
115 South Avenue
Rochester 1460-'
716-428-7328
Stater Island Council on the Arts
One Edgewaier Plaza, Rm. 311
Staten Island 10305
718-447-4485
• Onondaga County Public Library
at the Galleries
447 S. Salina Street
Syracuse 13202-2494
315-448-4636
• White Plains Public Library
100 Marline Avenue
White Plains 10601
914-682-4480
• Suffolk Cooperative Library
System
627 North Sunrise Service Road
Bellport 11713
516-286-1600
North Carolina
Asheville-Buncomb Technical
College
Learning Resource Center
340 Victoria Rd.
Asheville 28801
704-254-1921 x300
• The Duke Endowment
200 S. Tryon Street, Ste. 1100
Charlotte 28202
704-376-0291
Durham County Library
300 N. Roxboro Street
Durham 27701
919-683-2626
• North Carolina State Library
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh 27611
919-733-3270
• The Winston-Salem Foundation
229 First Union Bank Building
Winston-Salem 27101
919-725-2382
North Dakota
Western Dakota Grants Resource
Center
Bismarck State Community
College
Bismarck 58501
701-224-5400
• The Library
North Dakota State University
Fargo 58105
701-237-8886
Ohio
• Public Library of Cincinnati and
Hamilton County
Education Department
800 Vine Street
Cincinnati 45202-2071
513-369-6940
• The Foundation Center
Kent H. Smith library
1442 Hantu Building
Cleveland 441 IS
216-861-1933
The Public Library of Columbus
and Franklin County
96 S. Grant Avenue
Columbus 43215
614-645-2275
• Dayton and Montgomery County
Public Library
Grants Information Center
215 E. Third Street
Dayton 45402-2103
513-227-9500 ext. 211
• Toledo-Lucas County Public
Library
Social Science Department
325 Michigan Street
Toledo 43623-1614
419-259-5245
Ohio University-Zanesville
Community Education and
Development
1425 Newark Road
Zanesville 43701
614-453-0762
Stark County District Library
715 Market Avenue North
Canton 44702-1080
216-452-0665
Oklahoma
• Oklahoma City University Library
2501 North Blackwelder
Oklahoma City 73106
405-521-5072
• Tulsa City-County Library System
400 Civic Center
Tulsa 74103
918-596-7944
Orecon
• Multnomah County Library
Government Documents Room
801 S.W. Tenth Avenue
Portland 97205
503-223-7201
Oregon State Library
State Library Building
Salem 97310
503-378-4274
Pacific Non-profit Network
Grantsmanship Resource Library
33 N. Central, Ste. 211
Medford 97501
503-779-6044
Pennsylvania
Northampton Community College
Learning Resources Center
3835 Green Pond Road
Bethlehem 18017
215-861-5360
• Erie County Public Library
3 South Perry Square
Erie 16501
814-451-6927
• Dauphin County Library System
101 Walnut Street
Harrisburg 17101
717-234-4961
Lancaster County Public Library
125 North Duke Street
Lancaster 17602
717-394-2651
• The Free Library of Philadelphia
Logan Square
Philadelphia 19103
215-686-5423
• University of Pittsburgh
Hillman Library
Pittsburgh 15260
412-648-7722
Economic Development Council
of Northeastern Pennsylvania
1151 Oak Street
Pittston 18640
717-655-5581
Rhode Island
• Providence Public Library
Reference Department
150 Empire Street
Providence 02903
401-521-7722
South Carolina
• Charleston County Library
404 King Street
Charleston 29403
803-723-1645
• South Carolina State Library
Reference Department
1500 Senate Street
Columbia 29211
603-734-8666
South Dakota
• South Dakota State Library
600 Governors Drive
Pierre 57S01-2294
605-773-3131
800-592-1841 (SD residents)
Sioux Falls Area Foundation
321 S. Phillips Avenue, Rm. 404
Sioux Falls 57102-0781
605-336-7055
Tennessee
• Knoxville-Knox County Public
Library
500 West Church Avenue
Knoxville 37902
615-544-5750
• Memphis & Shelby County
Public Library
1650 Peabody Avenue
Memphis 38104
901-725-8876
• Public library of Nashville and
Davidson County
6th Ave. N. and Union Si
Nashville 37211
615-259-6256
-------
Texas
Amanita Area Foundation
701st National Place I
800 S. Fillmore
Amarillo 79101
806-376-4521
• Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
University of Texas
Austin 78713
517-471-5041
Community Foundation of Abi'rne
Funding Information Library
708 NCNB Bldg.
402 Cypress
Abilene 79601
915-676-3883
• Corpus Christi State University
Library
6300 Ocean Drive
Corpus Christi 78412
512-994-2608
• El Paso Community Foundation
201 L Main
B Paso 79901
915-533-4020
• Teas Christian University Library
Funding Information Center
Ft Worth 76129
817-921-7664
• Houston Public Library
Bibliographic Information Center
500 McKinney Avenue
Houston 77002
713-236-1313
• Lubbock Ana Foundation
502 Commerce Bank Building
Lubbock 79401
806-762-8061
• Funding Information Library
507 Brooklyn
San Antonio 78215
512-227-4333
• Dallas Public Library
Grants Information Service
1515 Young Street
Dallas 75201
214-670-1487
• Pan American University
Learning Resource Center
1201 W. University Drive
Er'.nburg 78539
512-381-3304
Utah
• Salt Lake City Public Library
Business and Science Dept.
209 East Fifth South
Sah lake City 84111
801-363-5733
VlRMOKT
• Vermont Dept. of Libraries
Reference Services
109 State Street
Montpelier 05602
802-828-3268
Virginia
• Hampton Public Library
Grants Resources Collection
4207 Victoria Blvd.
Hampton 23669
804-727-1154
• Richmond Public Library
Business, Science, & Technology
101 East Franklin Street
Richmond 23219
804-780-8223
Roanoke Cty Public Library
System
Central Library
706 S. Jefferson Street
Roanoke 24014
703-981-2477
Washington
• Seattle Public Library
1000 Fourth Avenue
Seattle 98104
206-3B6-4b20
• Spokane Public Library
Funding Information Center
West 906 Main Avenue
Spokane 99201
509-838-3364
«
West Virginia
• Kanawha County Public Library
123 Capital Street
Charleston 25304
304-343-4646
Wisconsin
• Marquette University
Memorial Library
1415 West Wisconsin Avenue
Milwaukee 53233
414-224-1515
• University of Wisconsin-Madison
Memorial Library
728 State Street
Madison 53706
608-262-3242
Wyoming
• Laramie County Community
College Library
1400 Last College Drive
Cheyenne 82007-3299
307-778-1205
Australia
ANZ Executors & Trustees Co.
Ltd.
91 William St, 7th floor
Melbourne VIC 3000
648-5768
Canada
Canadian Centre lew Philanthropy
74 Victoria Street Suite 920
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2A5
416-368-1138
England
Charities Aid Foundation
18 Doughty Street
London WC1N2PL
01-831-7798
Japan
Foundation Center Library
of lapan
Elements Shinjuku Bldg. 3F
2-1-14 Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku
Tokyo 160
03-350-1857
MEXICO
Biblioteca Benjamin Franklin
American Embassy, USICA
Londres 16
Mexico City 6, D.F. 06600
905-211-0042
Puerto Rico
University of Puerto Rico
Ponce Technological College
Library
Box 7186
Ponce 00732
809-844-4150
Universidad Del Sagrado
Corazon
MMT. Guevarra Library
Correo Calle Loiza
Santurce 00914
809-728-1515 ext 357
U.S. Virgin Islands
University of the Virgin Islands
Paiewonsky Library
Charlotte Amalie
St Thomas 00802
809-776-9200 exL 1487
For information on becoming a Cooperation Collection contact:
Anne Borland
The Foundation Center
79 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
(212) 620-4230
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
1 2
1 3
14
- DRAFT -
Reference Document C
Sample Budget
36
-------
Budget Detail
Total Program
I. Personnel
A. Salaries & Wages
(I) Exec. Dir. @ $1,500/mo.
x 10% x 12 mos.
(1) Proj. Dir. @ SI,200/mo.
x 100% x 12 mos.
(2) Counselors @ $900/mo.
x 100% x 11 mos.
(1) Counselor* @ $900/mo.
x 50% x 11 mos.
(1) Secretary @ $750/mo.
x 100% x 12 mos.
Total Total
Total Requested Donated
$100,671.12 $78,362.62 $22,308.50
.$ 77,762.62 $58,479.12 $19,283.50
% 1 ^ —ii^——
$ 49,950.00 $43,200.00 S 6,750.00
Requested
$14,400.00
$19,800.00
$ 9,000.00
Donated
$1,800.00
$4,950.00
$43,200.00 $6,750.00
•This half-time counselor position is contributed to this program by another social service agency.
Total Total
B. Fringe Benefits
SUI—3.2% x $24,000
(California rates)
Workers' Comp. Policy
F1CA—6.13% x $43,200
Total Requested Donated
$ 12,148.62 $10,479.12 $ 1,669.50
Requested Donated
$
%
768.00
350.00
$ 2,648.16
Health Ins.—2 single employees @
$35/mo.; 2 employees with depen-
dents @ $98.00/mo.; x 12 mos.
(employer pays 100%); S 3,192.00
Extended Disability Ins.—4
employees @ $4.02/mo. x 12 $ 192.96
Vacation & Sick Leave—16 wks.
@ avg. salary of $208.00/wk. $ 3,328.00
Fringe benefits for donated
executive director based on
agency's total iringe benefit
percentage (24 percent) of salary
($1,800)
Fringe benefits for donated
counselor, based on donating
agency's total fringe benefit
percentage (25 percent) of salary
($4,950)
$ 432.00
$ 1,237.50
$10,479.12 $ 1,669.50
-------
C. Consultant & Contract Services
Consulting Psychologist (Dr.
Goodjoe, N. Y. Psychological Assn.)
4 hrs./wk. x $40 x 52 wks.
Evaluation Consultant (Dr.
Fastbuck, University Evaluation
Center) 10 hrs./mo. x 525/hr.
S 15,644.00 S 4,800.00 $10,864.00
S 8,320.00
x 12 mos.
5 3,000.00
Bookkeeping Services by Fold,
Spindle & Mutilate, Inc. SI50/mo.
x 12 mos.
S 1,800.00
(4) Volunteer tutors @ 5 hrs./wk.
ea. x 48 wks. x 52.65/hr.
S 2,544.00
S 4,800.00
$10,864.00
Non-Personnel
A. Space Costs
Office rent—1,200 sq. ft. @
S6.00/ft./yr.
$ 7,200.00
Tutoring space—contributed by
local private school: 1 classroom
20 hrs./wk. x S50/wk. x 48 wks.
S 2,400.00
Office janitorial @ 5100/mo
x 12 mos.
$ 1,200.00
Office utilities @ S125/mo. x
12 mos.
S 1,500.00
S 9,900.00
S 2,400.00
B. Rental, Lease or Purchase of Equipment
(1) Secretarial Desk @ 5150.00
S 150.00
(1) Secretarial Chair @ 565.00
5 65.00
(2) Desks <§> 5100.00
S 200.00
(2) Chairs @.565.00
S 130.00
(2) Desks donated by applicant
@ rental value of S5.00/ea./mo.
x 12 mos.
S 120.00
(8) Chairs donated @ rental value
of S5.00/ea./mo. x 12 mos.
$ 480.00
(4) File cabinets @ S55.
S 220.00
(2) Spendthrift typewriters @
530/mo. leased x 12 mos.
S 720.00
(1) Framed scenic wallposter of
Big Sur — donated
S 25.00
(1) Dynamite Copying machine
leased @ 550.00/mo. x 12 mos.
S 600.00
S 2,085.00
S 625.00
C. Consumable Supplies
Desk top supplies for 6.S staff @
$125.00/ea./yr.
S 81150
100 reams copypaper @ 52.75/ea.
and 5 toner refills @ 540.00 ea.
S 475.00
S 22,908.50 . SI9,833.50 S 3,025.00
S 12^00.00 S 9,900.00 S 2,400.00
S 2,710.00 S 2,085.00 S 625.00
S 1,287.50 S 1,287.50
—0-
S 1,287.50
-------
D. Travel
Local mileage for Project Director
100 mi./mo. @ 17c/mi. x 12 mos. S 204.00
Local mileage for (2) Counselors:
200 mi./mo. @ 17c/mi. x 12 mos. $ 816.00
Travel expenses for Project
Director to attend Grantsmanship
Center Training Program in Los
Angeles, June 11-15, 19—($325
tuition plus 6 days per diem
@ $33/day S 741.00
S 1,761.00 S 1,761.00
E. Telephone
Installation @ $260.00
(6) Instruments @ $45.00/ea./mo.
x 12 mos.
F. Other Costs
Postage
Insurance (Fire, Theft and
Liability)
$ 1,761.00
$ 260.00
$ 3,240.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 600.00
$ 750.00
—0—
$ 3,500.00 S 3,500.00
$ 1,350.00 $ 1,350.00
S 1,350.00 -0-
-------
Budget Summary
Total
Total
Total
Requested
Donated
Total This Grant
$100,671.12
$78^62.62
S22,308.50
Personnel
S 77,762.62
S58.479.12
SI 9,283.50
A. Salaries and Wages
J 49,950.00
S43.200.00
$ 6,750.00
B. Fringe Benefits
S 12,148.62
$10,479.12
S 1,669.50
C. Consultant and Contract Services
S 15,664.00
$ 4,800.00
SI 0,864.00
Non-Personnel
S 22,908.50
$19,833.50
S 3,025.00
A. Space Costs
S 12,300.00
S 9,900.00
$ 2,400.00
B. Rental, Lease or Purchase
of Equipment
$ 2,710.00
S 2,085.00
S 625.00
C. Consumable Supplies
S 1,287.50
S 1,287.50
—0-
D. Travel
S 1,761.00
S 1,761.00
—0—
E. Telephone
S 3,500.00
$ 3,500.00
-0—
F. Other Costs
S 1,350.00
$ 1,350.00
-0-
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
- DRAFT -
Reference Document D
Alphabetical List of Foundations
41
-------
FOUOAT1CNS
Tne folloving 11 an alphabetical I tit of foundations appearing in this voluae. including any geographic restrictions on
tne foundation's giving program a full luting o4 geographic. prograt. end type o< support lumtioni it orovijeo «itn tne
full luting of eacr. iounoattons grants in Section I Fieast re»c tnese limitations carrfuliy. as well at aoomonai
progra* ano apolicat'on information available in tne founoattor's report or other Foundation Center publics-ions, be*ore
applying for grant assistance. Aeettional information on founoitions Msteo Is cooes as follow
*-•100 largest foundttions. R--publishes an annual or periodic report. CS—coapany-sponsored founojtior. Cm--cd—intty foundation
Apell-Hanger foundation
SO: vest Mil. Ra. 616
Midland. T* 79701
Mai ling aooress.
f.C Bo* 430
Midlane. T* 79702
LM: Giving liaitee to Tl, preferably
vithin tti* Peraian Basin
I)
Aetna Life I Casualty Foundation, Inc.
IS! faraington Ave.
Ma-tford. CI 06146
LM: 6iving Mattes to organizations ,n
tne U.S
CS
•ATll Foundation
650 Madison Ave
Ne> York, MY 10022-3297
CS II
* trier ton Faaily Foundation
c/o Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd.
ill South Sing St
Honolulu. HI 96813
Mailing address:
c/o Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd.
P.O Bo. 3170
Honolulu. HI 96802
LM: Giving lialted to HI, student aid
for HI residents onl>
R
The Blandm Foundatior
100 Potegaaa i>e ».
Grand Rapids. 55m
LM. 6iving Halted to ie>. vitr. eapnasit
on rural areas; scneiarsnipi lianas
to graouatet of a'. Itasca County.
Hill City, or Raaer hijn school
r
Booth Ferris FoiMation
SO Broad St.
Ne» Yon, MY 10004
LM. Giving Halted to the Me« York, my.
Metropolitan area for social service
agencies and cultural organisations
R
•The Anaanson Foundation
9215 kilanire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
LM- Giving priaarlly in southern CA.
with Moftasis on tne Los Angeles area
Akron Co—jnity Foundation
One Cascaoe Plaza
Akron. OH 44306
LM- Giving priaarlly in Suaait County,
Oh
CM R
George I. Alden Trust
370 Miin St.. Suite 1250
Worcester, ma 01608
LM. Giving priaarlly in the Northeast,
•ith Mpnasii on eorceiter. ma
R
•Aaerican Express Foundation
c/o Aaeriut Express Coapany
Aaerican Express Tooer, mrld Financial
Center
Mr* Yort, MY 10285-4710
LM; 6iving prlaanly In AZ. CA, CO. FL,
6A, IL. •«, NC. NE, MY, TX, UT. MA.
Pa uc O.C. International Coaautees
include Asia/Pacific. Canada. Europe,
Latin Aaerica. and japan
CS
*Aaoco Foundation, Inc.
200 East Randolph Or.
Oiicego. H 60601
LM: 6ivtng priaarlly In areas of coapany
representation to assist eaawnities
CS R
•ARCO Foundation
SIS Soutn Flower St.
LPS Angeles. CA 90071
LM: Giving priaarlly in areas of coapany
operations, especially Anchorage, ajl.
Dallas, Tx. ano Los Angelas. Ca;
giving also en a national basis
CS R
The Vineant Aster Foundation
405 Park Ave.
Nev Yort. MY 10022
IM: Giving priaarlly in New York City,
MY
R
Atkinson Foundation
Ten test Orange Ave.
South San Francisco. CA 94080
LM. Giving priaarlly In San Mateo
County. CA. for schools, colleges,
anc other organizations: United
Methodist churches ano ctxircn
activities in northern CA. and
international grantaamng for
technical assistance, relief, and
population lasues
CS R
Avon Products Fcundation. Inc.
Mine vest 6»th St.
Ne» York. NY 10019
LM. Giving liaited to areas iaaesiately
Surrounding coapany operatipns in Nev
York City. Rye. and Suffem, NY;
Newark. D£; Atlanta, 6A; Sprtngdale,
OH; Pasadena. CA; and Morton Grove.
IL
CS
Msry Reynolds Baococfc Foundation, Inc.
102 Reynold! Village
vinston-Sale*. NC 27106-5123
LM: Giving priaarlly In NC and the
southeastern U.S.. aad to national
organizations
R
Benton Foundation
1776 K St.. N.v., Suite 605
Mshington. K 20006
The Mary Di*e Biddle Foundation
1044 nest Forest Hills Blvd.
Ovrhaa. NC 27707
LM: 6iving Halted to New York. NY. and
NC
R
The HI 11 tee Blngnaa FaMation
1280 Leader slog.
Cleveland. OH 44114
LM: Giving priaarlly in the (astern
U.S.. «ith soae eacftasis on tne
Cleveland. Oh, area
R
Borg-xarner Foundation. Inc.
200 South Michigan Ave.
Chicago. IL 60604
LM Giving priaarlly in the Chicago. IL,
area
CS R
¦The Boston Foundstion, Inc.
60 State St.. 6th Fl.
Boston, MA 02109
LM. 6ivlng Halted to the Boston, MA,
aetrooolitan area
0 R
The Boston Globe Foimutien
c/o The Boston Globe
135 willias T. Morrissey Blvd. Oor
Boston, MA 02107
LM: Giving priaarlly in the Boston, Mt.
Metropolitan area
CS R
Tne Bothln Fomdatien
873 Sutter St.. Suite B
San Francisco. CA 94109
LM: Giving priaarlly in CA. «lth
caput is on San Francisco. Mann,
Sonoas. and San Mateo couities
The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation,
Inc.
TT7 East Wisconsin Ave., Suite 2285
Milwaukee. *1 63202
R
Otto Breaer Foundation
65 East Fifth St.. Suite TOO
St. Paul. IM 65101
IM: 6lvlng Halted to IW. M). ana «]
•nere there are Braaer Bank
affiliates, and to organizations
addressing poverty in the city of St.
Paul
R
The Brpan Foundation, Inc.
2118 Melcti Ave.
P.O. Box 130646
Houston, TX T7219
LM: 6ivlng priaarlly in Tx. with
admits on Houston
-------
FORMATIONS
Tr» Buffalo Founcation
1601 Main-Seneca Bids
23? turn St.
Bkrtfilo. NV 14203-2760
IV 6iving priaarily tn Erie County, iff,
scholarships Mrote to local
resioents only
CM R
¦BurMngtO" Nortnem Founoition
1 It East fxth St
St. Paul. wo-
rn. 6ivtng priaarily tn areas of coapany
operations, particularly Seattle, WA
CS R
•Tht Bush Foundation
last 900 First Hit tonal Bank filog.
332 Minnesota St.
St. Paul. 6S101
IN: Giving prtaarlly In IM, ND, and SO
R
C S Find
469 Boneeian H»y
Freestone. CA 86472
«
Cabot Corporation Foundation. Inc.
9S0 winter St.
P.O. Bo* 9073
Mltha*. HA 02254-9073
LM. Giving priaarily tn coawnlttct naar
Cabot corporate installations in T>;
Douglas County. IL; St. Mary Parish
and Evangeline Parish, LA; Boyertom,
PA; kanarfia County. *V; and tralthaa.
HA
CS R
Die Louis Calder Foundation
230 Part Ave.. Re. 1630
Me* York. KT 10189
Ul: 6fvtng prtaarlly In H6* York. NY
R
¦Carnegie Corporation of Ne» York
4)7 Madison Ave.
Nev York. NT 10022
Ul: Giving prtaarlly in the U.S. Sow
grants m Sub-Sanaran Africa, South
Africa, and the Caribbean
R
¦Aaen 6. Carter Foundation
1212 toe Center
P.O. Bo* 1036
Fort Worth. T* 76101
LM: Giving lareely restricted to Fort
aortti and Tarrant Coxity, TX
Kary Flagler Cary &iarttab1e Trust
360 Fifth Ave., Ha. 6622
He* York. NT 10116
LM: Giving Hatted to He* York City, NY.
for uic M the eastern coastal
states for conservation
Saeiel n. and Mary Castle Foundation
c/o HavaH Cc—unity Mi.
112 Herenant St.. Suite 330
Honolulu, hi teats
LM: Giving Hatted to HI
R
Die Otaaplln Foundations
P.O. Boa G37
Proviosnee. RJ 02901-0637
LM: 6tv ir. Coo*. County, 11
CM *
The G'tfter Cincinnati Foundation
602 Care* To*er
441 Vine St.
Cincinnati. OH 46202-2617
LM. Giving Halted to tne greater
Cincinnati, IX, area
CM R
The Clart Foindation
30 fall St.
Nev York, NY tOOOi
LM: Giving priaarily in instate NT and
Ne* York City
Robert Sterling Clark Foundation. Inc.
tl2 East 64th St.
Nev York, NT 10021
LM. Giving priaarily in NY, vlth
eoprusis on Ne> York City; givtnt
nationally for reproductive freeooa
projects
R
¦The Clevelanfl Foundation
MOO Hama Bids
Cleveland. OH 44lis
LM 6iving Halted to the greater
Cleveland area. *ith pnaary eWiasis
on Cleveland. Cuyahoga, Lake, and
Geauga Counties. OH. unless specified
by Oonor
CM R
The Collins Foundation
90S Terainal Sales Bloc
Portland. OR 97205
LM Giving Halted to OR. vitn eaonastt
en Portland
R
The Colorado Trust
Orw Civic Center Plaza
1660 Broadway, Suite 87E
Oenver. CO 60202-9697
LM. 6iving priaarily tn CO
R
Coluabla Foundation
1160 Battery St.. Suite 400
San Francisco. Ca Kill
LM: Giving priaarily in northern CA.
•ttn aaphasts en the San Francisco
•ay Ar«a
The Colotus Foundation
1234 East Broad St.
Coluacus, (H 43205
LM: 6lving Halted to central Oh frea
iwrastrlcted finds
CX R
•Gaaunities Foundation of Tews. Inc.
4606 Live Oak St.
Dallas. TX 7S204
LM: 6ivlng priaarily tn the Dallas. TX.
area
« R
Micneel J. Connell Foundation
201 South Lane Ave . Suite 303
Pasadena. Ca gild
LM. Giving priaarily in southern CA,
with aapnasis en Los Angeles
Cooke Foundation, ltd
c/o Haven Coaaunity Founeation
212 Merchant St . Suite 330
Honolulu. HI 96SU
LM Giving lieite: to HI or to
organizations serving tne people o<
HI
R
Jessie B. Cob Charitable Trust
c/o 6rants Hanageaent Associates. Inc
230 Congress St.. Jrr Fl.
Boston. Ml 02110
LM: 6ivtng priaarily In He* England
R
Cnarles (. Culpeper Foundation. Inc.
B66 United Nations Plaza, Re. 406
Nev York. NY 10017
Cuanins Engine Foundation
600 Jackson St.
Coluacus, IN 47201
Mailing address:
Bo* 3006
IC 60614
ColuKuS. IN 47202-3005
LM: Giving priaarily in areas of coveny
operations, particularly the
Colianus. IN. area
CS
The Arttvr Vintng Davis Foundations
645 Riverside Ave.. Suite 620
Jacksonville. FL 32204
LM: Giving priaarily tn U.S. and Its
possessions and territories
R
Tne Dayton Foundation
1695 Kettering Tover
Dayton. OH 46423
LM: Giving Halted to ttie greater
Dayton. (H. area
CM R
•Dayton Midun Formation
777 Nicollet Hall
Minneapolis. *4 6S402
LM: 6iving priaarily m areas of oovany
operations including let. especially
the Tvin Cities aetropolttan area:
Ml. Mk. Ca. in, and TX; grants rarely
for national organizations or
progra«s
CS R
Decrees Faatly Foundation, inc.
419 TTilro Ave.
P.O. Be* 706
Marren. PA 16365
LM: Bwtng priaarily
-------
foundations
•Tne Aaron Oiaaond Foundation Inc.
1270 Ave o< the Aaericas. Suit* 2624
Mt» Vpri, MY 10020
LM. Giving Halted to Ne» York City NY
ft
Cleveland H. Doope Foundation, Inc
670 vest 247tn St.
Riveroale. N1 10471
LM Giving prturi); ir tat. Yon. NY,
the Near last. and national
organizations
R
¦Garaldine R. Dodpr Foundation. Inc.
95 Madison A*e.
P.O. Bo> 1239
Morrittoon. NJ 07862-1239
LM Giving prtaarlly Ir NJ, *>tn support
for local luaane groups llaiteo to
nj, ana support for otner local
projects Halted to tne
Morristovn-Madison area: iok giving
in the other medic Atlantic states
•no Ne* England, and to national
organisations
R
Dolfinger-McManon Foundation
en* Franklin Plaza, 15th Fl.
Phiiaoelphia. Pa 19102
IN Giving Maited to the greater
Philadelphia. PA, area
R
The villiaa H. Conner Foundation, Inc.
SOO Fifth Ave.. Suite 1230
Ne> York. NY 10110
R
Tne Herbert H. and Grace A. 0o«
Foundation
P.O. Box 2184
Midland, Ml 48641-2184
LM: 6ivtng Halted to Ml. prlaarlly
Mldlane County
ft
*Th0 Dufct EndOMent
200 South Tryon St.. Suite 1100
Oiarlotte, MC 28202
Additional office:
3329 Cnapel H111 Blvd.
P.O. Box 81307
Ourtiaa, NC 27717-1307
LM: 6iving prlaarlly in NC and SC
R
Jessie Ball duPont Religious. Oiantable
and Educational Fund
Florida National Bank Tow
228 kater St.. Suite 1200
Jacksonville. Fl 32202-4424
LM: 6iving prlaarlly in tne South,
•specially Fi. DC, and VA
•
¦Eastern Koda* Charitable Trust
c/o Eaataan Kodak Coapany
*43 State St.
Rochester, my 14650
LM: Giving prtaarlly in hlpi aaployacnt
locations, including Rocnaster, NY;
Klngsport, TN; Kinosor. CO; Coluttla.
SC; and Longvia*. Tk; giving
nationally only for higher education
Tne Eoucational Foundation o< Aaen:a
3S Cnurcn Lr
Mestport. CI 06880
6rem application office
23161 Ventura Blvo . Suite 201
woodland Hills. Ca 91364
R
El Pato Loeaunit> Founoation
Texas Coaaerct Bank Bloc • Suite 4616
El Paso. Tk 79901
LM. Giving liaitao to the El Paio. TX.
area
CM R
El Pour Foundation
Tan Lake Circle Or.
P.O. Bo> 188
Colorado Springs. CO 80906
LM. 6iving tinted to CO
R
Saautl S. Fels Fund
2214 Land Title Bldfi.
100 South Broad St.
Philadelphia. PA IBIIO
LM Giving Halted to the city of
Philadelphia, pa
R
The Field Foundation of Illinois, Inc.
13S South LaSalle St.
Diicago. IL 60603
LM 6iving priaaMly tn the Chicago. IL,
area
R
*The Fore Foundation
320 East 43rd St.
He* York. NY 10017
R
¦Ford Motor Coapany Fund
The AaeMcan Re
Dearborn. Ml 4(121
LM: Givirg prtaarlly in areas of coapany
operations natior-vlot. "Ith special
aaphasis on Detroit ane -he rest of
Ml
CS R
Mary 0. and Matter F. Fraar Eleaaosynary
Trust
c/o Bishop Trust Co.. Ltd.
140 South King St.
Honolulu. Ml 96813
Mailing address:
P.O. Box 2390
Honolulu. N1 96804-2390
LM: Giving prtaarlly in HI
R
The Frost Fowiostlen, Ltd.
Oierry Creek Plaza II, Suite 205
650 South Dierry St.
Denver. CO 60222
LM: Giving prlaarlly In tne Souttwett.
including Afi. CO. U, IN, TX. AZ, and
OK
It
Charles A. Fruaauff Foundation, Inc.
70 Pine St.
Me* Yort, MV 10270
R
Lloyd A. Fry FoiMation
13! South LaSallt St.. Suite igiO
Chi cage.. IL 60603
in Giving prtaarlly in the Chicago, IL,
area
R
Tne Fund for Mea Jersey
67 aas'.ington Si
East Oranpe. NJ 07017
LM Givinc priaarily In Nj or to
regional prograas that benefit NJ
R
Fund for the City ol Me> York, Inc.
121 Ave. of tne Aaertcas
Ma* York, NY 10013
LM: 6iving Halted to Me* York City
The B. C. 6aabte and P. *. Stogao
Foundation
821 Marguette Ave.. 600 Foshay Toaer
Minneapolis. tN 68402
LM- Giving Halted to the
Miimeaoolis-St. Paul. kM.
aetropol itan area
R
¦Gannett Foundation
1101 ailscn Blvd
Arlington, VA 22209
Note:
After Nov. 1. 1B89. the Foundation *111
be 1n Arlington. VA. Before Nov. 1.
1989. tne Foundation is tn Rochester.
NY.
LM: Giving prtaarlly tn ar«as of Gannett
Co.. Inc. operations in tne U.S. and
Canada
R
Gates Fowdatton
3200 Cherry Craek South Dr.. Suite 630
Denver. CO 60204-3247
LM. Giving liaited to CO, specially the
Denver area, except fo*
foundation-initiated grants
R
Gebole Foundation, Inc.
Hotel Jaaestoan Bldg., Ra. 308
¦laaastovn. NY 14701
LM: Giving prlaarlly in Chautauqua
County and. secondly, in neighboring
areas of eastern NY; giving tn other
areas only ahen the project ts
consonant »itn prograa objectives
that cannot be developed locally
¦General Electric Foundation
3135 Luton Turnpike
Fairfield. CT 06431
LM: Giving liaited to the U.S. and Its
possessions; grants to oaaasilty
funds Halted to areas anare the
coapany has a slpnf leant presence
CS R
General Electric Foundation, Inc.
3135 Easton Turnpike
Fairfield, a 06431
IN: 6ivtng 1 tatted to fgrtiri or
doaastic organizations Mae funds
•1)1 be (pent outside the U.S. and
ttt possessions
CS R
-------
KMCATKMS
•General Motor* Foundation. lnt
13-MS toner*! Motors BIOS
KM* tost brand Blvd.
Detroit, HI 48202
LM. Giving priaarily In plant cities
•here coapany hit Stgnlf icant
operations
CS
General Service Foundation
1146 ru'i St.. Suite 201
P.O. ioi Kit
Boulder. CO 80302
R
tallage Alexander Gerbode Fouxat ton
470 Coliaeu* Ave., Suite 209
San Francisco. CA 94133
LM: Giving priaarily to prpgrsas
directly (Meeting restoents of
Alaaeoa. Contra Costa, Mann. San
Francisco. and San Mateo eomties ir
CA. and Hi; on occasion ano ai a
••cone priority grants vill be Bade
in other northern Ca coaaunities
R
The RolUn M. Gerslacker Foundation
P.O. Bex 1945
Midland, hi 4(640
IN: 6iv1ng priaarily m Ml and OH
R
Richard and Rnooa Golaaan Fund
1090 Sanson St.
San Francisco, Ca 94111
LM: 6lvlng priaarily in the San
Francisco Bay Area. CA
R
Grand Rapids Foundation
209-C eater* Bldg.
161 Ottavt. N.«.
Grand Rapids. Ml 41503
LM: 61vlng Halted to Kent County. MI
« R
Allen P. 1 Josephine B. Green Foundation
P.O. Box S23
Mexico. M) 65265
LM: 6ivtng prlaarily m tne Mexico, IS.
area
R
"The George 6une Foundation
One Erievle* Plaza
Cleveland. (W 441 n-1773
LM: Giving prmrily tn northeastern OH
R
Diarlet Hayden Fomdatlon
Om Banners Trust Plaza
ISO Liberty St.
Nev York. NY 10006
LM: Giving Halted to the New York. NT
(including northern mj>, and Boston.
MA, eetrcpoHtan areas
R
The Maarst Femdatton, inc.
MB Seventh Ave.
Nev York. MY 10106*4061
Address for applicants free vest of the
Mississippi River:
Thoaa* lastnaa, v.P. and western Dir.
90 Me* Montgomery St.. Suite 1212
San Francisco. CA G4I0S
LM: Giving Halted to the U.S. and Its
territories
•11 lias Randolph Hearst Fouidation
US Seventh Ave.. 21tr Fi.
He» yon.. NT 10106-0057
Address (or applicants fro* veit of tne
MISSISSIPPI River:
Trwaii Lastnaa. v.p. and aestern dr.
90 Nev Montgoaery Si . Suite 1212
San Francisco. CA #4 ids
LM. Giving liaiteo to the U.S. and its
ttrrIterics
•Herricfc Foundation
KOO Coaerica Bldg
Detroit. Ml 48226
LM 6lving priaarily in Ml
'The villiaa and Flora Hewlett
Foundatio-i
(25 Middlefield Rd.. Suite 200
MenIs Part. CA 9402S
LM Giving Halted to the San Francisco
Bay Area. CA. lor regional grants
prograa; performing arts Halted to
the area In part
R
A V Kmter Trust. Inc.
633 Seventeenth St.. Suite 1780
Denver. CO 80202
LM Giving Halted to CO. >ith eephasis
en Denver
The Hyoe and vataon Foundation
437 Southern Blvd
Onathaa lovnship. M 07928
LM 6ivlng prlaarily in the NY-HJ
aetrppolitan area
R
The Indianapolis Foundation
615 North Alaeaaa St.. Re. lie
Indianapolis. IN 46204
LM: 6iving Halted to Indianapolis and
Marion County. IN
& R
'The Jaaet Irvine Foundation
One Manet Plaza
Spear Tover, Suite 1715
San Francisco. CA 94105
Southern CA office:
460 Nevport Center Dr.. Suite 646
He ¦port Beach. CA 92660
LM: Giving Halted to CA
R
George Frederick Jevett Foundation
One Marltiae Plaza
The Alcoa Bldg.. Suite 990
San Francisco. CA 94111
LM. Giving prlaarily in the Pacific
NDrttnest. with aaphasis on northern
to and eastern ma. particularly
Spokane, and in San Franciaeo. CA
R
Johnson Controls Foundation
6767 North Green Bay Ave.
P.O. Bex 691
Milwaukee. W1 63201
CS
The Johnson's Mas Fund, Inc.
1626 Hove St.
Racine, Ml 63403
LM: Giving prlaarily in in and the
Miovejt in areas of ommiy
operations
CS
¦V Alton Jones Foundation, Inc
433 Part St
Cnarlottetville. VA 22901
R
'Trie Joyce Foundation
135 South LaSalle St.. Suite 4010
Chicago. IL 60603
LM: Giving priaarily in the eidvestern
stales, including IL. I*. Ia. mi, m..
Oh. wl; Halted nu*er o'
conservation grants aaoe iri IC. SO.
KS. K), and «
R
The Greater Kansas City Caaaunity
Femoatton and Its Affiliated Trusts
127 test IOth Si.. Suite 406
Kansas City. MO 64105
LM: 6iving priaarily in five county
p-eater Kansas City. K). area
CM R
The Kantzler Foundation
900 Center Ave.
Bay City. Ml 46708
LM. 6iving Halted to the greater Bay
City. MI area
The J. M Kaplan Fund. Inc.
330 Madison Ave.
Nev York. NY 10017
LM: 6iving priaarily In NY, vith
eephasis on Ne* York city; and for
rural open apace and faraland
preservation program in NY State,
•itn eephasis on the Midsen River
Valley
R
•¥. M. Keck Fetfidatten
665 South FI over St.. Suite 3230
LPS Angeles, CA 90071
LM: Giving priaarily tn southern CA in
all categories swept hip*r
eOication. and eedicai research
R
*w. K. Kellogg Foundation
400 North Ave.
Battle Creek. MI 49017-3398
LM: Giving priaarily 1n the U.S.. Latin
taerica; the Caribbean and southern
African countries; Support also for
international feltoachip prograas in
ether countries
R
The Kettering Faalty Foxiest ion
1440 Kettering Tover
Dayton. OH 46423
R
The Kettering Find
1440 Kettering Tover
Oeyton. Oi 46423
LM: Siring prlaan )y In Oi
*F. m. Kirty FoMatien, Inc.
P.O. Box Kl
Marristovn. KJ 07963-0161
LM: Giving prlaarily in NY. Mj. PA. and
VA
Mebert J. Kleberg. jr. and Helen C.
Kleberg Foundation
TOO Mgrtn St. Mary'a St.. Suite UOO
San Antonio. Tx 76205
R
-------
FOUNDATION
Mnigftt Foundation
foe Ctiuot Plua
A*ron. Oh «4J0t
LK: Giving lii'tM to cms wwe
Knignt-Rioder nmgaDPI are
pusiisnee. Ca. CO. F.. Ga. In. ks.
«- Ml. m. K. NC. K. ON. PA. SC.
an: SD for Cities Preg'ar: Journalise
anc arts and Culture prograas art
national in scoce
I)
Koret Foundation
3! Ne» Montgomery St.. Suit* 1090
San Francisco. Ca 94105
l>: Giving liaited to the Kay ar«a
cowties of San Francisco, Aleaeda.
Contra Costa. Marin. Santa Clara, ano
San Mateo, CA. ana Israel
R
•(raft Foundation
Kraft Court
6lenviev, II 60025
LK: Giving to organizations having
national lapact or enicn benefit
CO—.init us vnere comny eaployees
live and «ort
CS
*Tne (retge Foundation
P.O. Box 3151
3215 kest Big Beaver Rd.
Troy. MI 48007-3151
R
•Joan B. Kroc Foundation
893S villa La Jolla Dr.. Suit* 201
La Jolla. CA 82037
IM. Giving priaariiy in the San Diego.
Ca, area for prograas serving a
particular ci—unity: giving also for
national prograas
R
Levi Strauss Foundation
1156 Battery St.
P.O. Boi 7215
San Francisco. Ca UHl
LM: Giving generally Halted to artas of
coapany operations in Afi, Ca, 6a, ky.
•6. Tn. My, im. TX. and VA. and
abroad
CS
•Longaoed Foundation, Inc.
1004 vilaingtcn Trust Center
Vitaington, Ot 19801
LM: Giving liaitM to DC, *id 6rMter
Kllaington; soae giving in PA
•Lyntfxirat Fomdation
Suite 701, Tailan eiog.
too test Martin Lutner King Blvd.
taattanooga. TN 11402-2561
IM. Giving liaited to the coutheastern
U.S.. especially foattanooga. TN
R
J. Roderick MaeArtfwr Foundation
9333 north MtlvatAee Ave.
Milts. IL 60640
•*hn 0. and Catherine T. MacArtfw
Foundation
*40 South Daaroorn St.
bilcago, 11 60603
R
¦torproot Foundation
400 Baker Bldg
Minneapolis. IK two:
LM- Giving priaa'ily in MiwiaapoliS'St.
Paul. im. »r«i
R
Maraag foundation
1120 Norvest Center
St. Paul, w 61 IP'
LM. Giving liaitec to im
R
•Marin coawnity Foundation
1100 Larkspur Landing Circle, Suite 165
Larkspur. Ca 94999
LM: Giving ItaitaO to Marin Cowity. CA
Cm R
•Robert R. MeCoraict Charitable Trust
435 Mo'tn Michigan Ave., Suite 770
Cnicagc. 11 6061i
LM. 6iving priaariiy in the Chicago, IL,
aetropolitan area
R
•MeCune Foundation
1104 Cutwualth Bldg.
31C Fourth Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
LM 61ving primarily 1n southwestern PA,
with eepnasis on the Pittsburgn area
R
ttGregor Fund
333 *ett Fort Bldg.. Suite 2090
Detroit. Ml 4(226
LM. 6iving prlaarily in Detroit. Ml;
grants tc private colleges and
universities liaited to IN; Ml. and
ON
R
McKesson Foundation. Inc.
foe Post St.
San Franeisco. CA 94104
LM- 6iv1ng prlaarily in the Bay Area of
San Francisco, CA, and m other
cities ahere the ceapany has a aajor
presence
CS R
*Maadot Foundation, Inc.
Vilson Historic Block
2922 S«iss Ave.
Dallas. TX 752W-4928
LM: Giving liaitad to Tx
R
The andre* *. 1*1 Ion Foundation
140 last 62nd Si.
Me* York, NY 10021
R
•Richard King Mellon Foundation
626 wtlliaa Pern Place
Pittsburg, PA 16219
LM: Giving prlaarily tn Pittcbur^i and
••stern Pa, except for nationwide
conservation prograas
R
Joyce Marti-Stlaor* Foundation
tie last 16th St.
Ne« York. NY 10003
R
•Metropolitan Life Fowdation
One Madison Ave
Me» York. NY 10010-3690
CS
•Fred Meyer Charitable Trost
1515 Soutrwest Flftt- Ave., Suite 600
Portlano. OR 97201
LM Giving priaariiy in OR, eicept for
Special prograas rfiich a 1st. tncluoe
ma. ID, in ano ax
R
Milbant Maaorial Fund
foe last 7ttn St.
Nev York, MY 10021
R
Milwaukee Foundation
1020 Mortn BroaOvay
Milvauket. VI 63202
lm. 6iving priaariiy in the Milsaukte.
«l. araa
Ot R
•Mobil Fowidation. inc.
150 last 42nd St.
Nev York. NY 10017
LM. Giving priaariiy in areas of coapany
operations in Ca, CO, ll. la. kj, ny,
TX, VA. and «a
CS
Morgan Guaranty Trust Coapany of Nev
York Charitable Trust
23 Mall St.
Nev York. NY 10015
LM: Giving priaariiy In the Nev York
City. ny. area, except for selected
institutions of hipwr education, and
International affairs
CS
•Charles Stewart Molt Foundation
1200 Mott Foundation Bldg.
Flint. Ml 46602-1651
R
•M. J. Itirdock Ouritablr Trust
703 Broadway, Suite 710
Vancouver, VA 9SG60
Mailing address:
P.O. Box 1616
Vancouver, u 98666
LM: 6iving priaanly tn the Pacific
Northwest. <«A. OR. ID, ITT. and «);
amort for ooaaunity projects only
in the Portland. OR/Vancouver, w,
area
R
The Nev Hawsfilre foaritaSle hr*3
foe South St.
P.O. Box 1335
Concord, Mi 03302-1338
LM: Swing Halted to IM
» R
The Me* Haven Foundation
foe State St.
Nev Haven, CT 0(616
IM: Giving priaariiy In greater New
Ha van. CT, and tn» low Maugatuck
River Valley
CM R
-------
FOmCATlONS
The Ne* Tort Co—.mity Trust
416 Madison »vt
Ne> York, NY 100"
LM 61*1% primarily in the metropolitan
Me* lor*, NY. iru
CM R
Tne He* York Tim Coapany Foundation,
Ine
229 west 43i-8 St.
Mr* York. NY 10036
LM Giving primarily in the Me. York,
NY, eetropolitan *r» and in
localities served by affiliates of
th* coaptny
CS R
Edvtre Jom modi* Foundation, inc.
12 East 67th St.
Mr* York. MY 10022
BusIWI office UOTUi
P.O. Box 162
Mashingten Depot. CT 06794
LM. Giving primarily in tr» metrooollten
Me* York. NY, ares for erts
organisations and ttwir educational
programs: St. Catherine's Island. GA.
•nd tne esstern stales for
conservation projects and population
control; and tnt Northeast for
private colleges ana universities
The Sawel Roberts Noble Founoat ton.
inc.
P.O. Bo> 2180
Ardmore, OK 71402
LM: 6ivlng prlaarily m the Southwest.
•1th aapnasis on OK
R
Northaest Area Foundation
Mest 978 First National Bank Blag.
St. Paul, tn 55101-1373
LM: Giving prlaarily In ID. U. IM, MT.
M). OR. SO. and wa
R
Oklanoai City Coaaunity Foundation, Inc.
US Park Ave.
Oklanoai City. OK 73103
Additional address:
P.O. Boa 1146
Oklahoaa City, OK 73101
LM: 6lving prlaarily In greater Oktanoaa
City. OK
Ol R
¦John m. 01 in Foundation, Inc.
100 Park Ave.. Suite 2701
He* York. NY 10017
R
¦Spencer T. and Ann *. 01 in Foundation
#25 Pierre Lac loot Bide.
7701 Forsyth Blvd.
St. Louis. *0 63105
LM. Giving prlaarily in the St. Louts,
K>. area
a
then Faelly Faimstion
S10 Interchange Plaza test
435 Ford ltd.
Minneapolis, IM 66426
III: Giving prlaarily 4n the Twin Cities.
IM, eetropolltan area
R
The Oregon Commjnity fo«xioation
1110 Yeon Bios
622 SouttMest Fifth Ave.
Portland. OR 97204
IN- Giving liaitao to OR
» R
'The David and Lucllt Packard Foundation
100 Second St.. Sunt 200
Lot Altos, CA 94022 •
LM. 6iving prlaarily in the SJh
Francisco and Monterey Bay. CA.
areas, iw giving also m the Pueblo
area of CO
I
The Ralph M. Parsons Foundation
1055 vilshire Blvd.. Suite 1701
Los Angeles. CA 90017
LM: Giving Halted to Las Angeles
County, CA, vtth the exception of
sow grants for mpier education
R
The utilise Peim Foundation
MSO Locust St.
Philadelphia. PA 19103-630S
LM. 6ivirig lieited to the Philadelphia.
PA, area, and Caaoen County. NJ
R
'The Charitable Trusts
Three Pkey-, Suite 501
Philadelphia. PA 19102-1105
R
The Philadelphia Foundation
Tvo Mellon Bank Center, Suite 2017
Philadelphia. PA 19102
LM: 6ivtng Halted to Philadelphia and
to Bucks. Oiester. Delavere. and
Montgaeery com ties In southeastern
PA, eacept for designated funds
Ol R
Ellis L. Phillips Fouidatlon
13 Dartaouth College M»y.
Lyae. IM 01768
LM- Giving priaarlly in northern Me*
England
R
The Pittsburgh Foundation
to OC To»er
625 Liberty Ave.. 10th F1.
Pittsburgh. PA 15222-1199
LM: Giving lieited to Pittlburpi and
Allepwny County. PA
Ol R
PPG Industries Foundation
(he PPG Place
Pittsburgh. PA 16272
IM: Giving priaarlly in areas of eoeeany
operations. «itn aapnasis en the
Pittsburg, pa, region
CS R
Primaries Foifidatton
Aaerlean Lane
P.O. Boa 3610
Croanvtcti. CT OMW-S6IO
LM: Giving prlaarily to national
organizations. vith soaa emphasis on
areas of ooapany operations
CS R
¦The Procter t 6a»lt F«nc
P.O Bo> 699
Cincinnati, Oh 45201
LM Giving priaarlly in areas m the
U.S and «nere the coapany and Its
subsidiaries have large
concentrations of eaployees: national
giving for higher education and
economic and public afiairs
CS
The Prospect Mill Fowdatton. Inc.
420 Leitngten Ave . Suite 1020
Mr* York. NY 10170
LM. Giving prtaaMly in the northeastern
U.S.. including NY, NJ. end Rl:
atcport for youth and social agencies
prlaarily in the NY area
Tne Prudential Foundation
15 Prudential Plaxa
Nesark, NJ 07101
LM. Giving priasrily in areas of Coepany
operations, especially Never*. NJ.
end In CA, Fl, kM, and PA
CS R
¦Public Welfare Foundation. Inc.
2600 Virginia Ave., N.v., Ra. 605
ttshtagton. DC 20037-1977
Rattab FoinaatIon for Catholic
Activities, Inc.
P.O. Bon 4019
•llaington. DE 19607
The Retirement Research Foundation
1100 Kelt Higglns Rd., Suite 214
Park Ridge. 1L 60068
LM: Giving Halted to tne MiOMSt-ll,
IN. IA, nr. Ml. 10. WI-and FL for
service projects not having the
potential of national tapact
2. Saith Reynolds Foundation, Inc.
101 Reynelda village
Vinston-Salem. tC 27106-6199
LM: Giving lieited to IC
R
•Sid ». Richardson Foundation
109 Main St.
Fort North. TX 78102
LM: Giving Halted to TX. vith emphasis
on Fort worth in the areas of the
arts and tuaan services, and
statevtae in the areas of health and
•ducat ion
R
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
1290 Ave. of the Americas
Net Tort, NT 10104
R
Rockefeller Faally Find. Inc.
1190 Ave. of the Aaoricas. Ra. MSO
Mrv York, NY 10104
R
"The Rockefeller Fomsatlon
1111 Ave. of the Americas
Men York, NY 10016
R
-------
FOlOCATIOKS
•Roc*«eli International Corporation
Trust
600 Cr®nt St.
PittMurpt, PA 153IB
LN 6ivtng primarily in ir«u of
eorporatt operations, except for
stltcteo national organizations and
universities wiitfi art sources Of
recruits
CS
Sewei Rubin Foundation, Inc.
777 united Nations Plua
«i> York, my 1001?
San Dttgo Coamjnlty Fowdatlon
MS B St.. Suite 410
San Diego. CA 92101
LM: Giving Halted to San Oiego County,
CA
Oi R
The San Francisco Foundation
685 Market St.. Suite 910
San Francisco, U 94105-9716
LM. Giving Halted to trie Bay ares, CA
counties of Alaaeda. Contra Costa.
Ma-in. San Francisco, and San Mateo
Cv R
Santa Barbara Foundation
IS last Carrlllo St.
Sant* Barbara. CA 83101
LM: Giving Halted to Santa Barpara
County. CA
D< ft
¦Sara* Scaife Foundation, inc.
P.O. Box 266
Pittsburgh, PA 15210
LM: Giving Halted to PA for culture,
neaith and recreation; giving
nationally for public policy programs
R
Sciwr1ng-P'.oufr> Foundation, Inc.
Che Giralea Fares
P.O. Bon 1000
Madison. NJ 07940-1000
LM: 6iving primarily 1n areas «nere
corporate sponsor has major
facilities. especially nj and tn
CS R
Ti* icwrsin Foundation, Inc.
315 "est 67th St.. Suite 20
Mew York. NT 10019
LM: Giving priearUy tn New York. NT.
for arts and aoclal aelfare
II
The Florence and John Setuunn
Fowdatlon
IS Par* St.
Itantclalr. NJ 07042
R
The She lan Foundation, Inc.
Ten Lesbard St., Suite ISO
San Francisco, CA 04111
Ut: filving primsrily in A2. CA. ID. Iff.
Ml. nv, OR. ITT, T*. «A. tft. and
¦astern CO; sow national giving
¦Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
UO Fifth Ave.. Hth Fl.
Me* York, NT 10111-0242
R
». v. Smith Oiaritable Trust
101 Bryn M>«r Ave . Suite 200
Bryn Nsvr. P« 19010
LM: Giving primarily in the Delavar*
Valley, including Pnilaoclpfiia and
its neighboring counties; grants to
colleges and hospitals (ior indigent
eare) by invitation only
Mne Starr Foundation
70 Pine St
Me> York, MY 10270
State Street Foundation
c/o Stat* Street Ban* end Trust Co.
P.O. Bon 351
Boston, Ml 02101
LM Giving primarily in Ml
CS R
Steelcas' Fotnoat ion
P.O. 6o> 1967
Grand Ranids. MI 49507
LM. Giving netted to areas of comany
operations, including Grand Rapids,
Ml; Orange County. CA; Ashvllle, NC;
Athens, At: and Toronto. Canada
CS R
¦The Marry and 6rac* Steele Founoation
441 Old Nevport Blvd.. Suite 301
Nevport Beach, CA 92663
lm. Giving primarily in Orange County.
CA
R
The Steele-Reese Foundation
c/o Messrs. Davidson. Daeson t Clark
310 Madison Ave.
Me« York. MY 10017
LM: Giving prlurlly in southern
Appslschia, particularly KY. and in
the Nortiwest. *ith eephasis on ID;
aowlsrsntp program lislted to
students free Leffit and Custer
counties, 10
I)
Kittle M. Strong Foundation
Cafritz Bldg., Suite 409
1625 I St.. N.V.
•athlngton. K 20006
LM: 6ivlng priaarlly in the Nashington,
DC. area
R
The Oiarles J. Strosacker Foundation
P.O. Bos 21S<
Midland. MI 48641-2164
LM: 6iving priaarlly in Ml. with
eapnasis on the city of Midland
It
Turtfii Fowdatlon. Inc.
2S0 Park Ave., ta. 628
He* York, NY 10177
LM: Giving Halted to the northeastern
•tates. »itn mmpnmsis on NY
R
Texaco Philanthropic Fowdatlon Inc.
2000 Mestchester Ave.
Milto Plains. NY 10650
LM: Giving priaarlly in areas of company
operations to local organisations:
support also for national
organisations that se-ve a large
segment oi the population
CS R
The Tinker Fomdstion. Inc.
65 last 69th St.
No York. NY 10022
lm 6ivtng Halted to projects releted
to Utln America. Spain, arc Portugal
R
Tht harry A. and Margsret 0. Tovsley
Foundation
670 City Canter Bldg.
220 last Huron St.
Arm Arbor. Ml 48104
LM Giving Halted to Ml. with eephasis
on Ann Arbor end vasntena* County
R
TRV Foundation
1900 Richaono Rd.
Cleveland. OH 44124
LM: 6lv1ng primarily in TTN plant
coma .initios, *ltn some septus is on
Cleveleno, Oh
CS R
Rose C. Tucker Charitable Trust
BOO Souttwest Fifth Ave.. 24th Fl.
Portland. OR 97204
LM: Giving primarily in OR. with
emeus is on the Portland metropolitan
area
R
Alice Tweed Tuohy Fowdatlon
1006 Santa Barbara St.
Santa Barpara. CA 93101
Mailing address:
P.O. Box 2678
Santa Barbara. CA 93120
LM: Giving limited to the Santa Barbara.
¦ CA. area
R
Tun-ell Fund
33 Ivorgreen Place
Last Orange. NJ 07018
LM: Giving limited to NJ, particularly
the northern urban areas centered in
Essex County, and to VT
R
(MM Btarttable Founoation
2211 Congress St.
Portland, IC 04122
LM: 6iv1ng primarily in IC; capital
grants limited to the greater
Portland area
CS R
Victoria Foundation. Inc.
40 South Fullerton Ave.
Montclair. NJ 07042
LM: Giving primarily in Essex County.
NJ. with cartas is en the greater
Memark ares
R
Virginia Environmental Endowment
1061 East Cary St.
Richmond, va 21219
Mi ling address :
P.O. Bos 790
Richmond. VA 23206-0790
LM: Swing limited to va. and the Ovto
River end (anaM River valley
regions, including TN. CM, KY. and W
R
-------
bivttt •allaee-Roader'a Ptgott Fund.
Inc.
1270 **•. Of th* Aaorica*. Suit* 2118
Nt> York MY 10020
LM: eivtns priaarily in Na* York City
and ttw nortnaatt; mm Kcecrt for
national prograu
Hit vallac*-ftead*r#t Digest Fund. Inc.
1270 »*«. of tn* taaneat. Suit* 2118
NO* York, NY 10020
IM: 6
------- |