DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
DESIGNATION OF A NEW
OCEAN DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITE
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
JUNE 1988
-------
^osr4%
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
343 COURTLANO STREET
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365
June 1988
Dear Reviewer(s):
Enclosed please find your copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for an Ocean Dredged .Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) in deep water
offshore Pensacola, Florida. Technical questions on the DEIS may be addressed
to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Region IV in Atlanta, Georgia
(404/347-2126 or FTS 257-2126); procedural questions may be addressed either to
EPA/Region IV or to the EPA Headquarters Office in Washington, D.C.
(202/382-5075 or FTS 382-5075).
Please provide any review comments by the end of the 45-day review period
on July 25, 1988 . Comments should be sent to EPA/Region IV
at the following address:
Reginald Rogers
Coastal Programs Unit
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
We look forward to your timely comments
EPA/Region IV
Atlanta, Georgia
-------
A \
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
343 COURTLAND STREET
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30369
DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR
DESIGNATION OF A NEW OCEAN DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITE
Comments or inquiries should be directed to:
Reginald Rogers
Wetlands and Coastal Programs Section
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
(404) 347-2126
(FTS) 257-2126
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
APPROVED BY
May 31. 1988
Date
Regional Administrator
-------
OGVER SHEET
DRAFT
HWnOWENEAL IMPACT STATEMENT
PCR
DESIGNATION OF A NEW
OCEAN DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITE
PENSAOQLA, FDCRIQA
Lead Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Cooperating Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CE)
U.S. Navy
Abstract: The proposed action is to designate and use a new ocean dredged
material disposal site (ODMDS) in the Gulf of Mexico south of Pensaoola,
Florida. The proposed action will be conducted in accordance with the
Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, Ocean Dunping
Regulations (40 CFR 220-229) and all other applicable laws and regulations.
The proposed action would cause the following adverse environmental effects:
(1) water quality impacts, (2) alteration of site bathymetry and sediment
composition, and (3) smothering benthic organisms. Water quality impacts
include increased turbidity, the possible release of sane chemical
constituents, and lowering of dissolved oxygen levels. These impacts would
be very temporary and localized and would not significantly affect water
quality of the region. Changes in site bathymetry will be minimized by
controlling the discharge point of the dredged material. Seme changes in
sediment composition and smothering benthic organisms are unavoidable
impacts of the proposed action.
For Further Information Contact:
Reginald Rogers
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Wetlands and Coastal Programs Section
345 Courtland Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
(404) 347-2126; FTS 257-2126
Laurens Pitts
Navy Facilities Engineering
Command
P.O. Box 10068
Charleston, South Carolina 29411
(803) 743-0797
Comments: Comments on the Draft EIS must be received by EPA at the above
address by July 25, 1988 .
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CCWER SHEET i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OIF FH3JRES vii
1.0 SUMMARY 1-1
1.01 Major Findings and Conclusions 1-1
1.02 Areas of Controversy 1-2
1.03 Issues to be Resolved 1-2
1.04 Relationship of Alternative Actions to
Environmental Protection Statutes 1-2
2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED PCR THE PROPOSED ACTION 2-1
2.01 National Environmental Policy Act 2-1
2.02 Marine, Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act 2-1
2.03 Pensacola Bcmeport Project 2-1
2.04 Other Needs 2-2
3.0 ALTERNATIVES 3-1
3.01 Introduction 3-1
3.02 Land Disposal 3-1
3.03 No Action 3-1
3.04 EPA Designated Nearshore Disposal Site 3-1
3.05 Selection of a New Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site . . . 3-1
3.06 Alternative Site A .... 3-2
3.07 Alternative Site B 3-3
i
3.08 Alternative Site C 3-3
3.09 Preferred Alternative 3-3
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Page
4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 4-1
4.01 Introduction . . . 4-1
4.02 Climatology and Meteorology 4-1
4.03 Geology 4-1
4.04 Bathymetry 4-1
4.05 Circulation and Mixing 4-2
4.06 Water Quality 4-2
4.07 Sediment Quality and Characteristics 4-2
4.08 Sediment Transport 4-3
4.09 Plankton 4-3
4.10 Benthos 4-3
4.11 Carmercial and Recreational Fisheries 4-5
4.12 Threatened and Endangered Species 4-6
4.13 Mineral Resources 4-7
4.14 Shipping 4-7
4.15 Coastal Amenities 4-7
4.16 Cultural Resources 4-7
4.17 Military Restrictions 4-7
5.0 ENVIRCMffiNEAL CONSEQUENCES 5-1
5.01 Introduction 5-1
5.02 Geographical Position, Depth of Water, Bottcm
Topography, and Distance frcm Coast 5-1
5.03 Location in Relation to Breeding, Spawning,
Nursery, Feeding, or Passage Areas of Living
Resources in Adult or Juvenile Phases 5-2
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Page
5.04 Location in Relation to Beaches and Other
Amenity Areas 5-2
5.05 Types and Quantities of Dredged Material Proposed
to be Disposed of, and Proposed Methods of Release,
Including Methods of Packing the Dredge Material,
if Any 5-2
5.06 Feasibility of Surveillance and Monitoring 5-3
5.07 Dispersal, Horizontal Transport, and Vertical
Mixing Characteristics of the Area, Including
Prevailing Current Direction and Velocity, if
Any 5-4
5.08 Existence and Effects of Current and Previous
Discharges and Dumping in the Area (Including
Cumulative Effects) 5-5
5.09 Interference With Shipping, Fishing, Recreation,
Mineral Extraction, Desalination, Fish and Shellfish
Culture, Areas of Special Scientific Importance, and
Other Legitimate Uses of the Ocean 5-5
5.10 The Existing Water Quality and Ecology of the Site
as Determined by Available Data or by Trend
Assessment or Baseline Surveys 5-6
5.11 Potentiality for the Development or Recruitment
of Nuisance Species in the Disposal Site 5-7
5.12 Existence at or in Close Proximity to the Site
of Any Significant Natural or Cultural Features
of Historical Importance 5-7
5.13 The Dumping of Materials into the Ocean will be
Permitted Only at Sites or in Areas Selected
to Minimize the Interference of Disposal
Activities with Other Activities in the Marine
Environment, Particularly Avoiding Areas of
Existing Fisheries or Shellfisheries, and
Regions of Heavy Commercial or Recreational
Navigation 5-7
IV
-------
TABLE OF OONTENTS
(Continued)
Page
5.14 Locations and Boundaries of Disposal Sites will be
so Chosen that Temporary Perturbations in Water
Quality or other Environmental Conditions during
Initial Mixing caused by Disposal Operations
.Anywhere within the Site can be Expected to be
Reduced to Normal Ambient Seawater Levels or to
Undetectable Contaminant Concentrations or Effects
Before Reaching Any Beach, Shoreline, Marine
Sanctuary, or Known Geographically Limited Fishery
or Shellfishery 5-8
5.15 If at Anytime During or After Disposal Site Evaluation
Studies, it is Determined that Existing Disposal Sites
Presently Approved on an Interim Basis for Ocean
Dumping Do Not Meet the Criteria For Site Selection
Set Forth in CFR 228.5 and 228.6, the Use of Such
Sites will be Terminated as soon as Alternate
Disposed Sites can be Designated 5-8
5.16 The Sizes of Ocean Disposal Sites will be Liudted
in Order to Localize for Identification and Control
any Inmediate Adverse Impacts and Permit the
Implementation of Effective Monitoring and
Surveillance Programs to Prevent Adverse Long-
Range Impacts. The Size, Configuration, and
Location of any Disposal Site will be Determined
as Part of the Disposal Site Evaluation or
Designation Study 5-8
5.17 EPA will, Wherever Feasible, Designate Ocean Dumping
Sites Beyond the Edge of the Continental Shelf
and Other Such Sites that Have Been Historically
Used 5-9
5.18 The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of
the Environment and the Maintenance and
Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity 5-9
5.19 Irreversible or Irretrievable Conmitment of Resources .... 5-9
5.20 Relationship of the Proposed Action to Other Federal
Projects 5-9
5.21 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Effects and
Mitigation Measures 5-9
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Page
6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 6-1
7.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 7-1
8.0 REFERENCES 8-1
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Selection of Alternative Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Sites . . . A-l
Appendix B: Currents Off Pensacola, Florida
1. Summary B-2
2. Current Analysis B-15
3. Model Analysis B-32
Appendix C: Environmental Protection Agency, Water
and Sediment Quality Data, Site B and
Site C C-l
Appendix D: Characteristics of Dredged Material
1. Physical/Chemical Data D-l
2. Effects of Sediment Fran Two Locations Near
Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station on
Representative Marine Organisms D-l2
3. Chemical Analyses of Sediments From Two Sites
Near Pensacola, Naval Air Station and Tissues of
Marine Organisms Exposed to the Sediment D-30
Appendix E: Benthic Studies
Site B November 1986 E-l
Site B April 1987 E-20
Site C November 1986 E-38
Site C April 1987 E-57
Data Analysis Results E-75
Appendix F: Demersal Fishes and Invertebrates, Site B and Site C . . F-l
Appendix G: Proposed Monitoring Plan G-l
vi
-------
list of tables
Table Page
1-1 Relationship of Alternative Actions to Protection Statutes
and other Environmental Requirements 1-3
5-1 Summary of the specific criteria as applied to alternative
ODMDS's 5-11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1-1 Location Map 1-5
3-1 Alternative GOMDS, EPA 1986 3-4
3-2 Areas Eliminated From Consideration 3-5
4-1 Bathymetry of ODMDS's in Feet 4-8
4-2 Artifical Reef Sites 4-9
4-3 Navigational Channels, Safety Fairways, Anchorage Areas . . . 4-10
4-4 Coastal Amenities 4-11
5-1 Alternative ODMDS's 5-13
vii
-------
1.0 SUMMARY
1.01 Major Findings and Conclusions. The U.S. Navy has determined that it
is in the best interest of the United States to provide a better mix of
ships in its traditional ports as well as to establish new hcroeports for a
battleship surface action group, an aircraft carrier battle group, naval
reserve vessels and mine sweepers on the Gulf Coast. At Pensacola, the Navy
will hcneport the USS Kitty Hawk and a naval reserve patrol craft. To
provide adequate navigation facilities for the USS Kitty Hawk, deepening of
the existing channel to the Naval Air Station is required. Approximately
4.1 million cubic yards of fine-grained material will be dredged during
construction of the turning basin and Pensacola Bay channel. In January
1987, the U.S. Navy prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
Gulf Coast Strategic Ecmeport Project. As part of that EIS, the Navy
evaluated a number of alternatives for the placement of this fine-grained
material. As a result of these evaluations, the need for designation of an
ocean dredged material disposal site suitable to receive fine-grained
material was justified. The location of the Naval Air Station and other
geographic areas are shown on Figure 1-1.
The Corps of Engineers maintains a civil works navigation channel fran the
Gulf of Mexico to the Port of Pensacola as well as a number of smaller
navigation channels in the area. In addition to these channels, numerals
channels in the area are maintained by local entities and private citizens.
The need for disposal of maintenance dredged materials is expected to
continue. An approved Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) for the
Pensacola area would serve as one possible alternative for the disposal of
fine-grained dredged material fran various local governmental and/or private
projects as well as accomodating construction material fran the improvement
of the channel to the Naval Air Station.
Several alternative ocean disposal areas have been considered in addition to
the preferred location. The existing EPA designated nearshore disposal area
was eliminated fran consideration due to the restriction that materials
placed in this site be predominately sand sized. A site off the continental
shelf was also considered and eliminated based on the cost associated with
transportation of dredged materials to the site, the costs associated with
surveillance and monitoring of the site, and the lade of environmental
advantage for use of the site over the preferred location. Sites between
the continental shelf location and the preferred location were eliminated
because coral and other invertebrate fauna occurs on sediment free rock
outcrops at depths of 80 to 100 feet off Pensacola. These resources beocme
more numerous with increasing depth towards the Mississippi-Alabama reef-
inter reef facies which occur along the shelf edge.
Extensive field investigations of alternative Sites B and C were performed
in November 1986 and February/April 1987. Although the sites are very
similar in nature, the results of these investigations indicate that Site C
would be more suitable for designation as an ODMDS due to its distance fran
existing artificial reefs, live hard bottom communities, shipping fairways,
and other coasted amenities. The increased distance associated with
transportation of the dredged material to Site C would be outweighed by the
1-1
-------
reduction of possible impacts to the marine environment associated with it's
use.
The proposed action is the final designation of a new ODMDS for the
Pensaoola area. The preferred new GCMDS is located within Alternative Site
C which covers approximately 17 square miles and is defined by the following
coordinates:
Site C is located outside state territorial waters approximately 11 miles
from the nearest beach. The actual size of the ODMDS and it's location
within Alternative Site C will be determined utilizing the results of a
numerical model (DIFID) which is currently being run by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center. This model simulates
transport of disposed material as it descends through the water column and
spreads over the ocean bottcm under varying hydrodynamic conditions. These
results will be coordinated as part of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement.
The impacts associated with the placement of dredged material would be
temporary and localized in nature and would not significantly affect the
long-term productivity of the site. A monitoring program would be
implemented at the designated GCMDS to measure impacts and to help prevent
any adverse long-range impacts.
1.02 Areas of Controversy. No areas of controversy have been identified.
1.03 Issues to be Resolved. There are no major unresolved issues.
1.04 Relationship of Alternative Actions to Environmental Protection
Statutes! The relationship of the alternative actions to environmental
protection statutes and other environmental requirements is presented in
Table 1-1.
30° 09' 35" N
30° 09' 35" N
30° 06' 36" N
30° 06' 36" N
87° 21' 05" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 21' 05" W
1-2
-------
Table 1-1
Relationship of Mtern«tivo fictions to Environriental Protection Statutes
and Other Environn»ntal Rvquirenants
Federal Statutes
No Rcti on
Site B
Site i
ftrchwological and Historic Preservation Ret. as anended. 16 (JSC -169. et
seq.
NR
FC
FC
Clean Rir Ret, as anended, 12 USC 1857h—7. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Clean Hater Ret, as anended. (Federal Mater Pollution Control Rct>
33 USC 1251. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Coastal Zone flanagenent Ret. as anended. 1? USC H51. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Endangered Species Ret. as anended. 16 USC 1531. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Estuary Protection Ret. 16 USC 1221. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Federal Uater Project Recreation Ret. as anended. 16 USC 1SO-K12). et
seq.
NR
NR
NR
Fish and Mildlife Coordination Ret. as anended. 16 USC 661. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Land and Uater Conservation Fund Ret. as anended. 16 USC 1601—1601-11.
et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Itarine Protection. Research and Sanctuaries Ret. 33 USC HO1, et seq.
NR
FC
FC
National Historic Preservation Ret. as anended. 16 USC 170a. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
National Environnent Policy Ret. as anended. 12 USC 1321. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Rivers and Harbors Ret. 33 USC 101. et seq.
NR
FC
FC
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Ret. 16 USC 1001. et seq.
NR
NR
NR
Mild and Scenic Rivers Ret. as anended. 16 USC 1271. et seq.
NR
NR
NR
Uniforn Relocation Assistance and Real Property Requisition Policies
Ret (PL 37-616)
NR
NR
NR
The 6ulf Islands National Seashore CGINJ Systen CPL 31-660?
NR
FC
FC
Coastal Barrier Resources Ret CPL 97-318)
NR
FC
FC
NOTES: The conpli^-nc* categories used in this table Mere assigned based on the follouing
defi ni ti ons s
FC. Full cortpliance—fill requirenents of the statute, E.O.. or other* policy and related
regulations have been net for this stage of coordination.
PC. Partial compliance—Son* requirenents of the statute. E.O.. or other policy and
related regulations renain to be net for this stage of coordination.
NC. Nonconpliance—None of the requirenents of the statute. E.O. „ or other policy and
related regulations have been net for this stage of coordinate on.
NR. Hot applicable— Statute. E.O., or other policy not applicable.
-------
Table 1-1 CConti nued>
Relationship of R1iernativo fictions -to Environnental Protection Statutes
and Other Environnental Requirenents
Executive Orders, lienoranda, etc.
No Action
Si te 6
Site C
Floodplain Managenent CE.O. 11388)
Protection of Hetlands CE.O. 11990)
Environnental Effects Rbroad of Major Federal Actions CE.O. 12111)
Analysis of Inpacts on Prime and Unique Farmlands CCEQ Me nor an dun, 11 Rug 80)
NR
NR
NR
NR
FC
FC
NR
NR
FC
FC
NR
NR
State and Local Policies
NR
FC
FC
State Hater Quality Criteria
NR
FC
NR
NOTES: The compliance categories used in this table Mere assigned based on the -following
definitions:
FC. Full conpliance—fill requirenents of the statute. E.O., or other policy and related
regulations have been net for this stage of coordination.
PC. Partial conpliance—Sons- requirenents of the statute. E.O., or other policy and
related regulations renain to be net for this stage of coordination .
NC. Nonconplianco—None of the requirements of the statute, E.O.. or other policy and
related regulations have been net for this stage of coordination.
NR. Not applicable— Statute, E.O., or other policy not applicable.
-------
>
~0
\\V\xx >
\\\\\\\\ , ,
* \WX\„\\V\\' .
\ \ \ N -.x '>'.
\ N > N ¦ * \
^\\\\
•- \V\\\\\WN
\ ^ \N V^\N vN v
\ y \ N \ \ V x \ \ \
v\\ \V« v. \
\ » \ \ N \ 1 \ ^ \ '
\\ v\ v\ • \ V
\ - \ - \l
. vN * \ ~ \
vN \\ " \
\N» W v \
m
oo
¦—o
\
-------
2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED PGR THE PROPOSED ACTION
2.01 National Environmental Policy Act. Hie National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared
for major Federal actions that may significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. This EIS has been prepared to fulfill the NEPA
requirements of several Federal agencies. First, the EIS will satisfy the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) need for designation of an Ocean
Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) under Section 102 of the Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA). Second, it will satisfy
the U.S. Array Corps of Engineers need for NEPA documentation relating to
permitting under Section 103 of MPRSA. The EIS will also satisfy the U.S.
Navy's responsibility under NEPA for ocean dredged material disposal
activities associated with their Pensacola Strategic Hcmeport Project.
2.02 Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. The dumping of all
types of materials into ocean waters is regulated by the Marine Protection,
Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (MPRSA). Section 102 of the Act
authorizes the EPA to designate sites for ocean disposal pursuant to
criteria established in this section. EPA Ocean Dunping Regulations and
Criteria (40 CER 220-229) establishes procedures and criteria for selection
and management of ocean disposal sites and evaluation of permits. Section
103 of the Act authorizes the Corps of Engineers to issue permits for the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean
waters. The purpose of the action is to ocmply with the provisions of the
MPRSA and 40 CFR 220-229 by providing the information required to evaluate
the suitability of the proposed site for designation as an ocean disposal
site as well as providing information required in the Corps of Engineers
permitting process.
2.03 Pensacola Hcmeport Project. The U.S. Navy has determined that it is
in the best interest of the United States to provide a better mix of ships
in its traditional ports as well as to establish new hcmeports for a
battleship surface action group, an aircraft carrier battle group, naval
reserve vessels and mine sweepers on the Gulf Coast. The Navy's Gulf Coast
Strategic Hcmeport Project will locate twenty-seven ships at eight sites
along the Gulf Coast. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Gulf
Coast Strategic Hcmeport Project was filed with the EPA in January 1987, and
is incorporated into this EIS by reference. At Pensacola, the Navy will
hcmeport the USS Kitty Hawk and a naval reserve patro? craft. The USS
Lexington, currently based at Pensacola, will be moved to Corpus Christi,
Texas, as part of the overall Gulf Coast Strategic Hcmeport Project. The
Pensacola Hcmeport Project will require deepening of the existing channel to
the Naval Air Station (NAS) in Pensacola. Approximately 4.1 million cubic
yards of fine grained new work dredged material that is not suitable for
beach nourishment is initially proposed for disposal in the new ODMDS. The
U.S. Navy has a need for a new ODMDS in which to place the material since
MPRSA prohibits the disposal of dredged material in the ocean except in
designated sites, the EPA designated nearshore site at Pensacola is
restricted to receive predominately sandy material, and there are no
practicable alternatives to ocean disposal of this material.
2-1
-------
2.04 Other Needs. The new CCMDS is being designated for predominately
fine-grained dredged material that does not meet the grain size restrictions
for use of the existing EPA approved near shore OOMDS (median grain size
greater than 0.125 ran and a ccrposition of less than 10 percent fines). The
new ODMDS is initially required for disposal of dredged materials frcm the
Navy Hcmeport Project at Pensacola. However, the site could also be used in
the future for maintenance material dredged frcm the Navy's channel, the
Pensacola Harbor Ship Channel or private dredging projects provided the
material meets the criteria specified in the MPRSA. Additional Section 103
permit review would be required prior to use of the new CCMDS for any
dredged material other than the initial 4.1 million cubic yards proposed for
disposal. Additional dredged material testing and NEPA documentation may
also be required. Only material that meets the Ocean Dumping Criteria (40
CFTl 220-229) would be placed in the site.
2-2
-------
3.0 ALTERNATIVES
3.01 Introduction. The proposed action addressed in this EES is the
designation of an environmentally acceptable and economically feasible ODMDS
in the Gulf of Mexico south of Pensaoola, Florida. The U.S. Navy proposes
to establish a new hcmeport at Pensaoola for the aircraft carrier USS Kitty
Hawk and one naval reserve patrol craft. The OSS Lexington, currently based
at Pensaoola, will be moved to Corpus Christi, Texas as part of the overall
Gulf Coast Strategic Hcmeport Project. The proposed project will require
deepening the existing channel to NAS Pensaoola. Approximately 4.1 million
cubic yards of new work dredged material from the turning basin and channel
is initially proposed for disposed. Die U.S. Navy has requested that EPA
designate an GGMDS off Pensaoola, Florida, for the anticipated disposal of
fine-grained dredged material that meets the criteria for ocean disposal.
3.02 Land Disposal. Land disposal alternatives are considered when
evaluating the need for ocean disposal as required in Section 103 MPRSA. As
required by NEPA, the U.S. Navy has oonpleted a Final Environmental Inpact
Statement (FEIS) for the overall Gulf Coast Strategic Hcmeport Project,
including the Pensaoola Hcmeport. Die Notice of Availability of the FEIS
was published in the Federal Register on January 23, 1987, and the Navy's
Record of Decision was published in the Federal Register on June 4, 1987.
Dredged material disposal alternatives, including land disposal, for the
Pensaoola Hcmeport Project were evaluated in the Navy's FEIS and will not be
repeated in detail in this EIS. The reader should refer to the Navy's FEIS
for a more complete discussion of the dredged material disposal alternatives
that were considered. Hie purpose of this EIS and the site designation
process in general is to determine an environmentally acceptable and
economically feasible ocean disposal site so that such a disposal option
will be available to meet the anticipated dredged material disposal needs.
3.03 No Action. The no action alternative is defined as not designating a
new ODMDS off Pensaoola, Florida. The no action alternative would not
provide an acceptable EPA approved ODMDS for use by the Navy or other
entities for the disposal of dredged material that is not suitable for beach
nourishment or is not predominately sandy in nature i.e. acceptable for
disposal in the EPA designated nearshore Gulf of Mexico disposal site at
Pensaoola.
3.04 EPA Designated Nearshore Disposed Site. Hie EPA approved nearshore
gulf disposal site located approximately 3 miles south of Pensaoola Pass was
considered for disposal of the 4.1 million cubic yards of material frcm the
Navy turning basin and bay channel. This disposal site was eliminated fran
consideration because the dredged material proposed for disposal does not
meet the grain size criteria for use of the site. Hie nearshore site has
been designated to receive materials which are predominately sandy in
nature.
3.05 Selection of a New Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site. As part of
the final designation for the interim disposal sites for Pensaoola, Florida,
Mobile, Alabama, and Gulfport, Mississippi, the EPA conducted an extensive
evaluation of a number of areas in addition to the existing interim sites
3-1
-------
(EPA 1986). As part of this process the EPA considered a mid-shelf area
south of Pensaoola and a deepwater area south of Mobile, Alabama. EPA
defined the mid-shelf area as extending seaward of the nearshore area to
depths of 200 meters (656 feet). In this area physical and biological
characteristics are influenced by seasonal oceanographic and climatic
patterns. EPA noted that, although the shelf off Pensaoola is characterized
by rock formations with associated corals and other invertebrates beginning
at depths of 80 to 100 feet, and becoming more numerous approaching the
reef-interreef facies along the shelf edge, there was at least one area
which might be devoid of these significant resources and therefore suitable
as an OCMDS (See Figure 3-1). In addition to this mid-shelf area, the EPA
also defined a deepwater alternative area sane 64 nautical miles south of
Mobile, in waters deeper than 1200 feet (See Figure 3-1). This area was
considered favorable by Pequegnat et al. (1978) because it was outside the
principal economic and sport fisheries regions, and the receiving capacity
of the deep gulf would ameliorate effects frcm disposal of dredged material.
Based on the evaluation of each of the sites relative to the criteria
outlined in the MPRSA, in particular the proximity of the interim sites to
the navigation channels and the ease of surveillance and monitoring of the
interim sites, it was determined that the interim sites provided the best
location for the OCMDS. As noted in paragraph 3.04 above, the Pensaoola
site was restricted to receive only sand sized dredged materials. Hie
information presented in the 1986 EPA FEUS entitled "Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Pensaoola, FL, Mobile, AL, and Gulfport, MS Dredged
Material Disposal Site Designation" is incorporated into this EIS by
reference. The EPA designated nearshore site is addressed in that FEUS.
Considering this information, a decision was made to evaluate the
possibility of designating a mid-shelf site for dredged material which did
not meet the sand size restriction applied to the EPA designated nearshore
site at Pensaoola. Three alternative Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites
(OGMDS's) were selected for detailed evaluation based on existing
environmental information and econcriic considerations. A site designated
for ocean disposal of dredged materials must be located within an
economically and operationally feasible radius frcm the point of dredging
called a Zone of Siting Feasibility (ZSF). Initially, an economic haul
distance was developed to define the area south of Pensaoola in which an
OCMDS could be economically located. Urat distance was determined to be 20
miles from Pensaoola Pass. Then, a selective screening process was used to
eliminate sensitive and incompatible areas within a 20-mile radius of
Pensaoola Pass from consideration as an OCMDS. The results of the selective
screening process are presented in Appendix A. Figure 3-2 presents a
composite of the areas excluded from consideration as an OCMDS. Three
alternative sites were then selected for detailed studies from the area that
remained in consideration for an OCMDS. Alternative Sites A and B are
located within Florida state waters (3 leagues or 10.4 statute miles); Site
C is located seaward of state waters.
3.06 Alternative Site A. Alternative Site A was a four square mile area
located approximately 13 statute miles southwest of Pensaoola Pass in depths
of 60 to 70 feet. During the initial field evaluation, this site was
eliminated because it had no apparent environmental advantages, would be
3-2
-------
more expensive to use than either of the two other alternative sites because
it was farther fran Fensaoola Pass, and was adjacent to Alabama state waters
which would complicate the coordination process.
3.07 Alternative Site B. Site B covers approximately 17 square miles as
defined by the following coordinates:
Die northern side of Site B is approximately seven statute miles southeast
of Fensaoola Pass. Depths in the area range from 60 to 87 feet and the
bottom is generally classified as hard.
3.08 Alternative Site C preferred Alternative). Site C covers
approximately 17 square miles as defined by the following coordinates:
The northern side of Site C is approximately eleven statute miles south of
Fensaoola Pass. Depths in the area range from 60 to 95 feet and the bottom
is generally classified as hard, sand shell.
3.09 Preferred Alternative. The proposed or preferred alternative is the
final designation of a new ocean dredged material disposal site for the
Fensaoola area. The preferred new site is located within the site referred
to above as alternative Site C. This site, centered at approximately 30°
08'N latitude and 87° 18* 35"W longitude, was evaluated and selected with
full cognizance of the site selection criteria set forth in 40 CFR 228.5 and
228.6. Alternative Site C meets the eleven specific selection criteria (See
Paragraphs 5.02 - 5.12 and Table 5-1). The site is large enough and deep
enough so that material disposed at the site will remain within the
designated site boundaries during normal circumstances and so that potential
impacts outside the site will be minimized. The site is within an
economically transportable distance, yet is sufficiently removed from
amenities such as beaches, fish havens, artificial reefs, and hard bottom
areas so that these will not be impacted.
Additional studies are currently underway utilizing a numerical model
(DIFID) available at the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
This model simulates transport of disposed material as it descends through
the water column and spreads over the ocean bottom under varying
hydrodynamic conditions. These results will be coordinated as part of the
Final Environmental Iirpact Statement and will be utilized, along with
comments received on this Draft EIS, to define the actual coordinates of the
area to be designated as the ODMDS.
30° 13' 30" N
30° 13' 30" N
30° 10' 26" N
30° 10' 26" N
87° 18' 17" W
87° 13' 00" W
87° 13' 00" W
87° 18' 17" W
30° 09' 35" N
30° 09' 35" N
30° 06' 36" N
30° 06' 36" N
87° 21' 05" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 21' 05" W
3-3
-------
3-4
-------
04
i
cn
n \W\
-------
4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
4.01 Introduction. This section contains a description of the existing
environment in the vicinity of the alternative CCMDS's. The information
will form the baseline for projecting environmental impacts that would
result from disposal of dredged material into either of the alternative
sites studied in detail. Die information presented in this section was
developed frcm the literature and frcm field evaluations conducted by the
EPA (EPA 1987) and by the Naval Oceanographic Research and Development
Activity (NORDA 1987).
4.02 Climatology and Meteorology. The Pensaoola area has warm summers and
mild winters. According to data from the National Oceanographic and
Atmospheric Administration (NCAA), the average annual temperature is 68°F
with 54 days having a maximum temperature of 90°F or higher and 18 days
having a minimum temperature of 32°F or lower. The average annual
precipitation at Fensacola is 61 indies and ranges frcm 29 to 90 indies.
Hie average annual wind speed for Pensaoola is 8.3 miles per hour with
prevailing winds from the south 18 percent of the time and frcm the north 22
percent of the time. The north and south winds generally have higher
velocities than east and west winds. On the average, hurricanes strike the
Pensaoola region about once every 17 years with fringe effects being felt
about every 5 years (NCAA 1986).
4.03 Geology, lhe Gulf of Mexico in the vicinity of Pensaoola is
characterized by the Mississippi-Alabama Shelf depositional system and the
western Florida barrier spit and island depositional system. The
Mississippi-Alabama Shelf extends frcm De Soto Canyon on the east to the
Mississippi River Delta on the west and frcm the barrier islands to the 200
meter (656-foot) contour. The shelf is frcm 20 to 30 miles wide off
Pensaoola with it's width increasing to the west. The shelf surface is
relatively smooth in the western portion of the gulf; however, south of
Pensaoola it becomes highly irregular. As the sand sheet thins towards the
east, the limestone karst topography of the West Florida Shelf predominates.
Coral and other invertebrate fauna occur on sediment free rock outcrops at
depths of 80 to 100 feet off Pensaoola becoming more numerous with
increasing depth. Hie Mississippi-Alabama reef-interreef facies occur along
the shelf edge and consists of a series of well-cemented carbonate and
terrigenous sand pinnacles about 1 mile wide with an average relief of 27
feet, interspaced by an unconsolidated sand-silt-clay mixture. The
Continental Slope from the Mississippi River Delta to the De Soto Canyon is
a region of sediment instability marked by active mudflows, slumping, and
erosional furrows and gullies. Evidence of recent slumping also exists in
the bottom of the De Soto Canyon approximately 40 nautical miles southeast
of Pensaoola (EPA 1986).
The Florida barrier spit and island system were formed during the
submergence of dune beach ridges in the Holocene period. This system is
composed of long narrow islands with sandy beaches and forms the northern
boundary of Mississippi-Alabama Shelf in Florida (EPA 1986).
4.04 Bathymetry. Bathymetry data for the alternative CCMDS's is presented
4-1
-------
on Figure 4-1. Water depths at Site B range fran approximately 65 to 88
feet and average 71 feet. At Site C, the depths range fran 60 to 95 feet
and average 76 feet.
4.05 Circulation and Mixing. A field study conducted between February and
June 1987 by the N3RDA shewed the nearshore currents off Fensaoola are wind
driven, parallel to the coast and obtained speeds up to 50 centimeters per
second (1.6 feet per second). The currents were uniform through the water
ooluran and within the two alternative disposal sites (NORDA 1987) (Appendix
B). Additional information oollected during a similar study during October
and November 1987 will be included in the FEIS.
The measured currents and wind data recorded at Pensaoola were used to
calibrate a numerical current model. The calibrated model was then used to
hindcast currents at the alternative disposal sites using winds recorded at
Pensaoola since 1948. The model showed that over long time periods,
currents at the disposal sites will be stronger and toward the west more
frequently than observed during the field study. Die model hindcast 100
centimeters per second (3.3 feet per second) currents during Hurricane
Fredric in 1979 as the strongest current during the forty year period of
record (NORDA 1987) (Appendix B).
4.06 Water Quality. Water quality data was collected by the EPA at the
alternative ODMDS's during November 1986, April 1987, and July 1987.
Samples were collected at the top, middle, and bottom of the water column
fran eight stations at each site. No significant difference in water
quality was observed between the alternative CEMDS's (EPA 1987) (Appendix
C).
Dissolved oxygen values measured during the EPA surveys ranged fran 4.7 to
8.1 parts per million (ppn). The maximum dissolved oxygen values always
occurred at the surface and the minimum values always occurred at the
bottom. Ihe maximum differential value between the top and bottom at any
one station was 3.2 ppn.
The temperature structure at the alternative ODMDS's was relatively
isothermal during the EPA surveys. The maximum temperature differential at
any one station was 3.2%. The range of temperature values was fran 19.0%
in April 1987, to 30.4% in July 1987.
Salinity values measured during the EPA surveys ranged fran 31.4 to 38.0
part per thousand (ppt). No significant salinity stratification was
observed during the surveys. The maximum salinity differential at any one
station was 4.5 ppt.
The percent light transmission was also measured during the EPA surveys.
Light transmission averaged 60 percent at a depth of 1-foot and was reduced
to approximately 2 percent at 60 feet.
4.07 Sediment Quality and Characteristics. Sediment samples were collected
fran 20 stations at each alternative CCMDS and analyzed for metals,
nutrients, oil and grease, pesticides and chlorinated hydrocarbons. As
4-2
-------
shown in Appendix C, all parameters were either below the minimum detection
limits or in very low concentrations (EPA 1987).
The sediments at each alternative ODMDS are predominately medium and coarse
sands as shown in Appendix C. The samples ranged frcm 88 to 99 percent
medium and coarse sand and averaged 96 percent.
4.08 Sediment Transport. At times, currents at the alternative ODMDS's are
sufficiently strong to transport the medium and coarse grained sand on the
sites. This is especially true under hurricane and other extreme weather
conditions. The maximum current projected for Hurricane Fredric was 100
centimeters per second and the maximum current observed by N3RDA in 1987 was
50 centimeters per second. Appendix B presents a summary of the measured
and projected currents at the alternative ODMDS's (NORDA 1987). A 50
centimeter per second current would transport sane of the medium size sand
but should not move the coarse sand. A 100 centimeter per second current
would transport the coarse sand. Bottom currents are expected to be 30
centimeters per second or less approximately 70 percent of the time. Medium
grain sand would not be moved by these currents.
4.09 Plankton. Over 900 species of 110 diatcm genera and 400 species of 61
dinoflagellate genera have been reported frcm the Gulf of Mexico. The
dominant ocmponent of phytoplankton in the Gulf of Mexico are diatoms
including Nitzschia seriata, Thalassiothrix frauenfeldii, Thalassionema
nitzschioides, Skeletonema costatum, Asterionella japonica, and Chaetoceros
spp. (Simmons and Thanas 1962). Exceptions to this are in silicate-depleted
waters or during red tides when dinoflagellates may become more abundant.
Dinoflagellates reported to have widespread distribution in the Gulf
include: Ceratium, Glenodinium, Goniodana, Pyrocystis, Gymnodinium, and
Peridinium. Hie highest diversity of phytoplankton has been reported frcm
areas affected by river discharges where both riverine and marine species
occur. Phytoplankton concentrations as high as 31,400 cells per liter have
been recorded by the State University System Florida Institute of
Oceanography (SUSIO) in waters frcm the mid-shelf area south of the
Mississippi Coast (SUSIO 1975). Peaks in abundance occur during the spring
and summer in estuarine and coastal areas and during the winter in offshore
areas (EPA 1986). No site specific studies of phytoplankton, however, have
been oonducted at the alternative ODMDS's.
Copepods are normally the dominant component of the zooplankton in the
vicinity of the alternative GOMDS's (EPA 1986). U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI) data indicate that, in nearshore and estuarine waters,
Acartia tonsa is the dominant species whereas Euchaeta, Eucalanus, and
Candacea are more abundant offshore (DOI 1974). In the mid-shelf region
south of Mississippi, Paracalanus has been reported in concentrations of
3036 individuals per cubic meter (SUSIO 1975).
4.10 Benthos. During the site designation studies a combination of side
scan sonar, continuous video recording, and still photography were utilized
to characterize the bottom and determine the presence of potential live/hard
bottom communities. Side scan sonar of both alternative sites B and C
revealed no features interpretive of live/hard bottoms. Real time
4-3
-------
observation of the video and subsequent review of all video recordings
revealed the homogeneity of alternative sites B and C. Die sites are
dominated by coarse and medium sand with varying amounts of shell fragments.
Sand waves at each site are oriented in a generally northeast to southwest
direction, however, many observations in alternative site B revealed a
tendency for a shift to a somewhat more east to west orientation. Sad wave
height and pattern was quite variable throughout each alternative site and
ranged fran approximately 2 indies with a dinpled pattern up to heights of 6
inches with a well defined regular pattern where wave crest and trough were
parallel. Intermediate heights of approximately 2 to 4 indies with an
irregular, or braided, configuration were also prevalent throughout each
site. The only biological feature present in the video/still photographs
was the sea pen, Virqularia presbytes. These octocorals are associated with
soft bottoms and have been recorded from North Carolina southeastward
through the Gulf of Mexico to Galveston, Texas.
Field surveys of the alternative QDMDS's indicate infaunal communities
characteristic of medium and coarse grain sediments of the northern Gulf of
Mexioo. Polychaetes are numerically dominant, typically making up over 50
percent of the individuals collected. Various species of molluscs and
arthropods also contribute to the overall community composition.
Folychaetes found to be dominant in alternative Site B include the
Paraonidae Cirrophorus spp., the Spionidae Aonides paucibranchiata,
Spioiahanes bcmbyx, and Prionospio cristata, Sabellidae, particularly
Fabrxciola trilobata, and an unidentified Serpulidae (designated as Genus
C)~. Abundant molluscs include the pelecypod Crassinella lunula ta and the
gastropods Caecum irnbricatum, C. pulchellum, and CaecunTsp. A. Arthropods
include numerous species of ostracods, the amphipods Ampelisca agassizi and
Metharpina floridana, the cumacean Cyclaslpsis unicornis, andthe tanaids
Apseudes"ip. H and Leptochelia sp. D. Other benthic species found in
abundance include cephalochiordates in the genus Branchiostcma, asteriods and
echinoids. Appendix E presents a full listing of all species collected at
Site B during November 1986 and April 1987. Mean density of individuals
fran Site B ranged frcm a low of 3571 per nr to a high of 15076 per nr in
November to a low of 9670 per nr and high of 23780 per nr in April.
Diversity is relatively high with individuals being somewhat evenly
distributed among the various taxa. The number of taxa per station ranged
frcm 122 to 205. Bicmass is highly variable between stations depending
primarily upon the percent contribution of molluscs to the total. Appendix
E presents a summary of the biological community parameters for Site B.
Q-mode cluster analyses indicate a high degree of similarity between the
sampling stations in alternative site B. This analysis, based on species
abundance, revealed greater than 65% similarity between the stations for the
November 1986 sanpling period and greater than 60% similarity for the April
1987 sanpling period. During November 17 out of 20 stations were 75%
similar or greater. Die remaining 3, stations 8, 16, and 13, formed a group
which was similar to the rest at the 67% level (See Appendix E).
Investigation of sediment texture of these three stations indicates a
significantly lower proportion of sediment in the coarse sand category and a
significantly higher proportion in the medium sand category than the
remaining 17 stations, this difference in sediment texture is reflected in
4-4
-------
the abundance and distribution of benthic species. Similar groupings are
also noted for the April sampling. R-raode cluster analyses were also
performed in which biological units were clustered based on their
distribution among the stations sampled. In these analyses a high degree of
similarity is recognized between species which were relatively equally
abundant at all of the stations and a lower degree of similarity between
those with spotty abundance.
Alternative Site C is also dominated by polychaetes. Abundant forms include
the Paraonidae, especially Cirrophorus spp., the Sabellidae, particularly
Eabriciola trilobata, the Spionidae, Prionospio cristata and Spiophanes
bcmbyx, and the Serpulidae Genus C. Dcminant molluscs include the
gastropods Caecum pulchellum, C. infericatum, and Caecum sp. A. Abundant
arthropods include numerous species of ostracods, the amphipod Microdeutopus
myersi and the tanaid Leptochelia sp. D. Other forms found with wide
distribution include Branchiostoma spp., asteriods and echinoids. Appendix
E presents a full listing of all species collected at Site C during the two
sampling periods. Abundance at Site C ranged between 10582 per m2 to 24168
per mz in November and 6531 per m2 to 19907 per m2 in April. Diversity at
Site C was somewhat higher than Site B due to the fact that distribution of
individuals among the various taxa was higher. Number of taxa per station
ranged from 154 to 196. Bicmass was also highly variable due to the
contribution of molluscs to the total. Appendix E presents a summary of
biological community parameters for Site C.
Q-mode cluster analysis of data fran alternative site C revealed similar
conclusions as with site B. In the November sampling 18 of the twenty
stations shewed 75% or greater similarity. Stations 7 and 16, which formed
an outlier group with about 61% similarity, again showed lower percentage of
coarse sand and higher percentage medium sand. Similar rationale applies to
the outlier groups formed of stations 7, 18+16, and 13+6 for the April
sampling period. R-mode cluster analyses revealed similar findings to those
discussed for alternative site B above. Appendix e presents the Q- and R-
mode dendrograms and the data matrix two-way contingency tables to
characterize the relationships resulting fran these analyses.
4.11 Commercial and Recreational Fisheries. A detailed study of commercial
and recreational fisheries in the area of the proposed ocean disposal sites
has not been conducted; however, information obtained from Escambia County,
Florida, and information presented in Pybas (1986) suggests that there are
numerous active reefs and proposed artificial reef sites offshore of
Pensaoola, Florida. Pybas (1986) provides locational information on ten
active reefs and Escambia County information suggests that an additional 17
sites are tentatively proposed as reef sites (See Figure 4-2). Of the ten
active reefs, one site (Escambia Site #15) is located in the southeast
quadrant of Site B and one site known as the "Russian Freighter" is located
just east of the east boundary of Site B. Of the proposed reef locations,
two are located in the southeast quadrant of Site C (Escambia Sites #3 and
#4). Artificial reefs in the project area are fished primarily for snapper,
grouper, triggerfish and amberjack.
The U.S. Army Engineer District, Mobile, Alabama, and the EPA, Athens,
4-5
-------
Georgia, sampled/ on May 19-20f 1987/ demersal fishes frcm alternative Sites
B and C. Appendix f contains a figure showing the location of the sample
sites and a list of the fishes and invertebrates collected.
A total of 49 species contained in 42 genera and 27 families were collected
at Site B. The results of the diel sampling of Site B indicate that the
cusk-eels (Ophidiidae) were by far the most abundant both frcm a total
species and total number of specimens per species standpoint. Dominant
cusk-eel species were Lepophidium qraellsi (blackedge cusk-eel), Ophidion
holbrooki (bank cusk-eel)/ and Otophidium~cniostiqtiium (polka-dot cusk-eel).
Other abundant species included Diplectrum formosum (sand perch), Stenotcmus
caprinus (longspine porgy), Prionotus martis (barred searobin), and Syacium
papillosum (dusky flounder). The results of the sampling at Site C indicate
a total of 31 species contained in 27 genera and 18 families. The dominant
species collected at Site C were Hemipteronotus novacula (pearly razor fish),
Trachurus lathami (rough scad), and Syacium papillosum.
Epifauna collected frcm Site B included crustaceans/ echinoderms, molluscs,
cnidarians and ascidians. Die most abundant crustaceans were Sicyonia
brevirostris (rock shrimp) and Portunus spinicarpus (crab). Hie most
abundant mollusc was Lolicto pealeii (squid), and the only cnidarian was
Virqularia presbytes. E£ifauna collected frcm Site C include crustaceans,
echinoderms, mollviics, and ascidians. Ihe most abundant crustacean was
Sicyonia brevirostris. The most abundant mollusc was Loliqo pealeii. A
list of epifaunal species collected frcm both sites is presented in Appendix
E.
Die alternative ocean disposal sites may also be utilized for shrimping
although shrinking appears to be limited to pink shrimp (Peneaus duorarum)
and rock shrimp. Information presented in Darnell and Kleypas (1987)
indicates that pink shrimp inhabit the area predominantly in the fall,
whereas, rock shrimp inhabit the area year round. Information presented in
the Fishery Management Plan for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
(Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council 1987) indicates that little or no
recreational fishery exists for pink shrimp or rode shrimp.
4.12 Threatened and Endangered Species. Endangered and threatened species
that do occur or that could potentially occur in the vicinity of the ODMDS's
are listed below:
listed species
scientific name
status
finback whale
humpback whale
right whale
sei whale
sperm whale
green sea turtle
hawksbill sea turtle
Kemp's ridley sea turtle
leatherback sea turtle
loggerhead sea turtle
Balaenoptera physalus
Meqaptera novaeanqliae
Euballaena qlacialis
Balaenoptera borealis
Physeter catodon
Chelonia mydas
Eretmochelys imbricata
Lepidochelys kempf
Dermochelys coriacea
Caretta caretta
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
endangered
threatened
4-6
-------
There are no other species proposed for listing. Also, no critical habitat
or proposed critical habitat occurs in the vicinity of the ODMDS's. This
information has been coordinated with the National Marine Fisheries Service
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (See Section 7.0).
4.13 Mineral Resources. According to the Minerals Management Service
(MMS), most oil and gas leasing has occurred in the Destin Dome area to the
east of the alternative ODMDS's. Leases have also been granted to the west
and south of the ODMDS's. There are no active or inactive oil and gas
leases within six miles of the alternative ODMDS's (MIS 1987).
4.14 Shipping. Both alternative ODMDS's overlap the navigation safety
fairway established for the Pensaoola Channel as shown on Figure 4-3.
4.15 Coastal Amenities. Coastal amenities located in the area include
parks, aquatic preserves, historic forts and national seashores which are
shown on Figure 4-4. The gulf beaches on Santa Rosa Island and Ferdido Key
are used extensively for recreational activities such as swimming, fishing
and sun bathing. Alternative Sites B and C are located approximately 4 and
8 miles, respectively, frcm the nearest aquatic preserve.
4.16 Cultural Resources. A literature search was conducted to determine if
significant submerged cultural resources such as historic shipwrecks were
located in the vicinity of the alternative ODMDS's. A number of recorded
wrecks are listed for the Pensaoola area; however, no wrecks were identified
in the vicinity of the alternative COMDS's (Berman 1972; Coastal
fiivironments, Inc. 1977; Fischer, Personal Communication, 1987; Lytle 1975,
NCAA n.d.). These results have been coordinated with the Florida State
Historic Preservation Officer (See Section 7.0).
4.17 Military Restrictions. There are no military restricted areas in the
vicinity of the ODMDS's.
4-7
-------
t I i J
STATUTE MILES
71
73
72
66
70
69
IB
73
65
69
72
75
75
70
72
69
70
76
80
76
70
74
64
67
72
76
65
60
64
71
83
87
W
SITE B
85
94
82
80
100
90 SITE C »
100
104
FIGURE 4-1
BATHYMETRY OF
ODMDS'S IN FEET
4-8
-------
SAFETY
fairway
©
18 a
A
19
ANCHORAGE AREA
A
17
©
A
16
©
SITE B
©
safety fairway
~
15
©
A
14
~
7
©
A
6
A
5
8
A
9
A
13
A
10
A
12
A
II
©EXISTING ARTIFICIAL REEFS
~ PERMITTED ARTIFICIAL REEFS
a PROPOSED ARTIFICIAL REEFS
-------
\
AL*BamA )
^ Fi-ORiDa
trSSiCOLfyf § ) / J
/ ( East SAy^^. "jh
Pe&SP^fE**\AC°LA - *
^ rr-37 <3 (F* ^ ^ CX V~^ ..SANTA ROSA SOUND"
g fTCvWS eeROnOtt* ] J ^ - *NT~ RObTfcLAND KV\V V \~> \
) m I 7 i\
\\\W\n / ImxaustaKAl A\\<
^\^\\\\ ^ 1 /vV »
>J /\\4 *»*»"«*" I I umvrmr A\\\\ \
£o A v\ / I j 1 *Vl A \\ \ \"Y
L v \ \\ / «»4 // // //A \\ v \ x \ ,
PA \*A / l / / X >\\\\\ \
I v^T<^ \ l \ / f—f—A \\ \ 4 \\\V> * '
few Lw
VA\\<\\ ^HL^/ yO \x \x\* \\ »\\
9£§*h\ \ \ \N x\v\ / / \\ \\ \\ n^-^njv'
if'/ 7
- A V • _^A,\\\\\ \\\\ ^^\ \X\X\ V\\\\\X,X- \\\N- \\\ \\X> \X 7 rnl~Wl
A\Wn
-------
~ — \ \ \ w \ *
v W \ S V \
-------
5.0 ENVIRGN4ENEAL CONSEQUENCES
5.01 Introduction. This section contains an evaluation of the
environmental consequences of designating and using a new OCMDS in the Gulf
of Mexico south of Pensaoola, Florida. Alternative OCMDS's are evaluated in
the following paragraphs relative to the five general criteria [40 CFR
228.5] and the eleven specific criteria [40 CER 228.6(a)] as required by the
Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. These criteria
identify factors that must be considered when evaluating alternative ODMDS's
to prevent unreasonable degradation of the marine environment.
5.02 Geographical Position, Depth of Water, Bottom Typography, and Distance
from Coast [40 CFR 228.6 (a)!]. The alternative OCMDS'S are located on the
shallow continental shelf off Pensaoola, Florida (See Figure 5-1). Site B
is located approximately seven statute miles from the coast and is defined
by the following coordinates:
and Site C is located approximately eleven statute miles fran the coast and
is defined by the following coordinates:
Water depths range frcm 65 to 88 feet at Site B and fran 60 to 95 feet at
Site C. Bottom topography of the alternative ODMDS's is relatively flat as
shown on Figure 4-1. In general, the shelf surface off Pensaoola is highly
irregular with the sand sheet thinning toward the east, where limestone
karst topography predominates. Coral and other invertebrate fauna occurs on
rock outcrops at depths of 80 to 100 feet and becomes more numerous with
increasing depth. The alternative ODMDS's have been located in areas of
sand bottoms to avoid inpacting areas which contain live bottom communities.
The material to be dredged fran the Navy turning basin is approximately 36
percent clays and silts, 63 percent sand and 1 percent shell. The initial
disposal of 4.1 million cubic yards will decrease water depths by
approximately four feet over 700 acres, assuming a ten percent bulking
factor for the sediment. Other management options are available for the
OCMDS which result in a thinner deposition layer over a larger area:
1) 1-foot over 2,800 acres; 2) 2 feet over 1,400 acres; 3) 3 feet over 930
acres.
The numerical model (DIFID) available at the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Stations is currently being utilized to simulate transport of the
disposed dredged material as it descends through the water column and
spreads over the bottom under varying hydrodynamic conditions. Input data
30° 13' 30" N
30° 13' 30" N
30° 10' 26" N
30° 10' 26" N
87° 18' 17" W
87° 13' 00" W
87° 13' 00" W
87° 18' 17" W
30° 09' 35" N
30° 09' 35" N
30° 06' 36" N
30° 06' 36" N
87° 21' 05" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 15' 43" W
87° 21' 05" W
5-1
-------
for the model consist of characteristics of the dredged material, the
proposed disposal site, and the disposal operation. Various sensitivity
tests relative to the actual environment are being conducted to investigate
disposal operations. The output of the model will include disposal mound
characteristics (horizontal dimensions, thickness of deposit, materials
deposited), whether the material remains within the limits of an artifically
applied boundary or moves out of this boundary, and what percentaged of the
disposed material is lost from the site, This information will be utilized
to determine the actual size and location of the ODMDS within the
alternative site studied. The final management plan will be developed in
coordination with concerned State and Federal agencies and will be
coordinated in the Fined EIS.
5.03 Location in Relation to Breeding, Spawning, Nursery, Feeding, or
Passage Areas of Living Resources in Adult or Juvenile Phases [40 CFR 228.6
(a) 2]. A great deal is known about the general life-cycle of fish and
shellfish in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Many of these species are
estuarine dependent, spending a portion of their life cycle in an estuary
such as Fensacola Bay. In general, the species spawn in the waters of the
Gulf of Mexico and eggs or larvae are carried by the currents into the
estuaries through the barrier island passes. Once in the estuary, the
larvae and juveniles congregate in the shallow bays and wetland areas.
After a season or more, the species then migrate through the pass into the
gulf where spawning occurs. Specific migration routes and actual location
of spawning areas within the northern Gulf are not well known, however the
passes between the barrier islands and shallow vegetated estuarine systems
are inportant in the life cycles of these species.
Alternative Sites B and C are located approximately seven and eleven statute
miles, respectively, frcm Pensacola Pass. Therefore, use of either site
should not affect migratory passage through the pass. The distance fran
important nursery and feeding areas is even greater since these areas are
located inside the estuary itself. In addition, the alternative sites are
not known to be located near any major breeding or spawning area.
5.04 Location in Relation to Beaches and Other Amenity Areas [40 CEft 228.6
(a) 3]^ Sites B and C are located seven and eleven statute miles,
respectively, south of the nearest beach. Beach and shore-related amenities
include Santa Rosa Island, Perdido Key, Gulf Islands National Seashore, Fort
Pickens, and Fort Pickens State Park and Aquatic Preserve. The aquatic
preserve boundary extends three miles into the gulf. The alternative
ODMDS's are located a sufficient distance offshore to prevent impacting
these amenities. Further protection is afforded since the predominate
currents are parallel to the shoreline and any migration of material from
the GCMDS would be alongshore rather than in an onshore direction.
5.05 Types and Quantities of Dredged Material Proposed to be Disposed of,
and Proposed Methods of Release, Including Backing the Dredged MaterialTTf
Any [40 CTR 228.6 (a)4]. The designated ODMDS will be used for disposal of
new work and maintenance material dredged frcm the Pensacola Bay area which
meets the criteria specified in Section 103 of the MPRSA. Initially, it
will be used for approximately 4.1 million cubic yards of sand, silt, and
5-2
-------
clay dredged for the Navy Haneport Project. The ODMDS may also be used for
the disposal of additional fine-grained dredged material in the future but
no immediate requirement is known. The dredged material will be transported
to the ODMDS and discharged by hopper dredge, hopper large or dump scow.
Analyses of the sediments initially proposed for discharge indicate that no
contaminants are present in unacceptable levels and that the material meets
the criteria specified in Section 103 of the MPRSA (See Appendix D). The
sediments proposed to be disposed were subjected to biological and chemical
testing to determine toxicity and bioaccumulation potential utilizing three
representative narine organisms. The toxicity of the sediments tested was
minimal. Exposure to the sediments for 10 days had little observable
adverse effect on lugworms (Arenicola cristata), oysters (Crassostrea
virginica) or pink shrimp (Penaeus duorarum). The suspended solid phase of
the sediments had little effect on mysids (Mysidopsis bahia) (EPA 1988a). No
chemicals of interest were bioaccumulated sufficiently frcm the sediments
tested to warrant concern. No pesticides or PCBs were detected in sediments
or animal tissues before or after the 10-day exposure. Several metals and
petroleum hydrocarbons were detected; however, the increase in
concentrations in tissues of lugworms, oysters, and shrimp was always less
than 3 times greater than concentrations in animals exposed to reference
sediments and appeared ecologically insignificant (EPA 1988b).
In addition to the required bioassay/bioaccumulation studies, sediment
samples were collected frcm eight stations during March and May 1986. The
results generally show that heavy metals and nutrient concentrations in the
sediments are at levels lower than would normally be expected in "natural"
sediments. However, the results show a slight enrichment in chranium at
four locations, mercury at one location and zinc enrichment at three
locations. All the locations are in the vicinity of the existing Navy
Turning Basin where the initial dredged material would originate. Although
sane heavy metal enrichment exists, the levels are not sufficient to warrant
capping of the dredged material with clean sediments.
Sediment samples were collected frcm 20 stations at each alternative ODMDS
and analyzed for metals, nutrients, oil and grease, pesticides, and
chlorinated hydrocarbons. All parameters were either below the minimum
detection limits or in very low concentrations (See Appendix C). The
sediments on each alternative ODMDS are predominately medium and coarse
sands as shown in Appendix B. The 4.1 million cubic yards of dredged
material consists of approximately 36 percent clays and silts, 63 percent
sands and 1 percent shell. Thus, the surface sediments on the ODMDS will
become somewhat finer immediately after the discharge. The ODMDS is
expected to become armored with sand and shell as the clay and silt is
winnowed out by the currents. Seme "clay balls" may also be present on the
surface due to the cohesive nature of seme of the material. These changes
would not pose a significant threat to the marine environment and would not
require capping of the dredged material.
5.06 Feasibility of Surveillance and Monitoring [40 CFR 228.6 (a) 5]. Hie
location of the alternative ODMDS's presents no special problems for
surveillance and monitoring. Sites B and C are located seven and eleven
-------
miles offshore, respectively. Water depths range from 65 to 88 feet at Site
B and from 60 to 95 feet at Site C. The size of the QDMDS will be limited
to facilitate monitoring and surveillance of the site designated. The
results of the modeling simulation discussed in Section 5.02 above will be
utilized to define the actual size and location of the site. In the absence
of this information, it is estimated that approximately 6 square miles will
be included in the ODMDS which would not present an unrealistic denand on
surveillance or monitoring activities. These water depths are amenable to
either surface sampling or diver collection and do not require the use of a
large oceanographic surface vessel. High turbidity may occasionally
restrict diver operations and photography but is not expected to be a
significant hindrance to surveillance and monitoring. Data collected at the
COOS's by the EPA in 1987 will serve as the baseline for future monitoring.
Site surveillance can be accomplished by air frcm Pensacola Municipal
Airport or by water frcm numerous facilities in Pensacola Bay. A proposed
site monitoring plan has been developed to determine the short and long term
impacts to the marine ecosystem associated with disposal of dredged material
into the ODMDS (See Appendix G).
5.07 Dispersal, Horizontal Transport, and Vertical Mixing Characteristics
of the Area, Including Prevailing Current Direction and Velocity, if Any
[40 CFR 228.6 (a) 6]. A field study conducted between February and June
1987 by the Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity (NQRDA) showed the
nearshore currents off Pensacola to be wind driven, parallel to the coast
and to obtain speeds up to 50 centimeters per second. The currents were
uniform throughout the water column and within the alternative ODMDS's.
The measured currents and wind data recorded at Pensacola were used by NCRDA
to calibrate a numerical current model. The calibrated model was then used
to hindcast currents at the alternative ODMDS's using winds recorded at
Pensacola since 1948. The model showed that over long time periods,
currents at the ODMDS's are stronger and toward the west more frequently
than observed during the field study. The model hindcast 100 centimeters
per second currents during Hurricane Fredric in 1979 as the strongest
current during the forty-year period of record (NORDA 1987).
This information and additional data on currents collected during October
and November, 1987 is currently being utilized in simulating the transport
of the disposed dredged material as it descends through the water column and
spreads over the bottom under varying hydrodynamic conditions as described
in Section 5.02 above.
The ODMDS's occupy a small area relative to the area of the continental
shelf near Pensacola. As noted in Section 5.02 above, changes in bathymetry
are small in relation to the water depths on the sites. Therefore, the
discharge of dredged material into either alternative ODMDS would have
negligible impact on the circulation and mixing of the shelf waters.
The fine grained dredged material proposed for discharge onto the ODMDS will
be more easily transported than the existing bottom materials; i.e. the
finer material can be moved by a lower current. Clay size particles can be
eroded by currents as low as 20 centimeters per second. These currents can
5-4
-------
be expected to occur up to 65 percent of the time. Thus, as stated above,
the clay and silt size particles on the surface of the ODMDS can be expected
to be winnowed out by the currents and the site will become armored with
sand, shell, and "clay balls." The fine grained particles should become
more difficult to erode over time as the material consolidates.
The environmental consequences of the transport of this fine grain material
on the marine ecosystem will vary depending on the proximity of the area in
question to the actual disposal location. Impacts within the designated
ODMDS would range from direct burial of benthic resources and increased
suspended solids concentrations in areas adjacent to the disposal location
to minimal impacts near the boundaries of the site. Impacts outside the
designated ODMDS will be minimal because: (1) the site is being sized to
contain the majority of the fine grained material under normal hydrographic
conditions and (2) the location of the site is being chosen to be a
sufficient distance from any unique resources or resources of special
concern. Under abnormal hydrographic conditions, i.e. hurricane conditions,
impacts due to the movement of ambient sediment particles would mask any
impacts due to movement of fine grained materials.
5.08 Existence and Effects of Current and Previous Discharges and Dumping
in the~Area (Including Cumulative Effects) [40 CTO 228.6 (a) 7]. There have
been no previous discharges within either alternative site. Hie only other
ODMDS in the area is the EPA-designated nearshore disposal site
approximately three miles south of Pensaoola Pass. It's use, however, is
limited to sandy dredged material containing less than 10 percent clays and
silts.
5.09 Interference With Shipping, Fishing, Recreation, Mineral Extraction,
Desalination, Fish and Shellfish Culture, Areas of Special Scientific
Importance, and Other Legitimate Uses of the Ocean [40 CFR 228.6 (a) 8].
Hie alternative ODMDS's chosen for detailed evaluation were selected to
minimize interference with the activities listed. See Appendix A for a more
detailed discussion of the site selection process.
Fish, due to their motile nature, would not be directly affected by the
discharge since they can avoid the area. However, seme species would be
indirectly affected due to the loss of benthic organisms which serve as a
food source for these species. These impacts would be localized to the
immediate area of the disposal operation and would be temporary in nature.
Chemical analyses and bioassays of the dredged material indicate that no
significant toxic effects are expected.
One permitted and two existing artificial fishing reefs are located in the
eastern quadrant of alternative Site B. Two sites are located within the
area chosen for detailed investigation while the other is on the eastern
boundary (See Figure 4-2). Use of the eastern side of alternative site B as
an ODMDS would impact the existing and permitted artificial reefs.
The eastern boundary of alternative Site C is located approximately 2 miles
due west of the nearest known fishing reef (Escambia County #7) and
approximately 3 miles from a permitted reef site. Two proposed artificial
5-5
-------
reef sites are located within alternative Site C and two sites are located
east and southeast of the eastern boundary of the site (See Figure 4-2).
Since the predominate currents are towards the west the use of alternative
Site C would not impact the known or permitted reef sites or those proposed
for establishment that are outside the detailed area of study. The proposed
reef locations within alternative Site C would be inpacted by designation
and use of an ODMDS in this area. This impact is not considered significant
since these are only two of over twenty proposed reef locations in the
vicinity of the alternative sites studied. In addition, there are other
areas within this general region which would be suitable for establishment
of artificial reefs.
There are no known areas of shellfish culture in the vicinity of the
alternative sites nor are there any known areas of special scientific
importance in the vicinity of either alternative site, therefore no impacts
to these resources would result fran the proposed action.
Mineral resources would not be significantly affected since there are no
active or inactive oil or gas leases within six miles of either OOMDS. Most
oil and gas leasing has occurred in the Destin Dome area to the east of the
alternative ODMDS's. Designation and use of a ODMDS and mineral exploration
and extraction are considered compatible uses therefore future use of an
ODMDS for these activities should not be in conflict.
The alternative ODMDS's overlap the shipping safety fairways (See Figure 4-
2). The western half of alternative Site B overlaps the north-south safety
fairway and the eastern one-third of alternative Site C overlaps this same
fairway. Use of Site B would not affect shipping since direct discharge
into the safety fairway would be prohibited and although predominant
currents are toward the west use of the eastern portion of this site would
not impact the safety fairway since the depth of water in this site is
sufficient to prevent any impacts from material that may migrate into the
fairway. Use of Site C would not affect shipping since direct discharge
into the safety fairway would be prohibited and material would not migrate
into the fairway since predominant currents are toward the west. Some
increase in traffic in the shipping lanes would be expected during the
disposal operation; however, no significant impacts would accrue due to this
action.
ttiere are no military restricted areas near the alternative sites;
therefore, no impact would accrue due to the designation and use of the
COMDS.
5.10 The Existing Water Quality and Ecology of the Site as Determined by
Available Data or by Trend Assessment or Baseline Surveys [40 CFR 228.6 (a)
§Y. Baseline surveys were conducted on the alternative GDMDS's during 1986
and 1987. The surveys show the water quality and other environmental
characteristics of the alternative ODMDS's to be typical of the northern
Gulf of Mexico where sand or sand/shellhash sediments predominate. The
results of the surveys are discussed in the Affected Environment Section and
presented in Appendix C (EPA 1987). In summary, neither of the alternative
sites possesses unique characteristics which would preclude it's designation
5-6
-------
and use as an ODMDS.
The alternative locations have been coordinated with the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act. The NMFS has determined that neither ODMDS would affect any
endangered or threatened species or any critical habitat (See Section 7.0).
The designation and use of a new ODMDS was coordinated with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service during review of the U.S. Navy Gulf Coast Strategic
Homeporting Project. In a letter to the U.S. Navy dated February 18, 1987
the Fish and Wildlife Service concurred that the proposed activity would not
affect any endangered or threatened species for which they have
jurisdictional responsibility (See Section 7.0).
5.11 Potentiality for the Development or Recruitment of Nuisance Species in
the Disposal Site [40 CFR 228.6 (a) 10]. Sane change in benthic species
composition on the designated ODMDS can be expected due to a difference in
grain size frcm the existing bottom. However, there is no evidence to
suggest that benthic species which would develop would be considered
nuisance species. Seme fecal coliform bacteria may b»; contained in the
dredged material; however, it is improbable that these species would beccme
established in either of the alternative sites due to the existing salinity
regime of the area.
5.12 Existence at or in Close Proximity to the Site of Any Significant
Natural~or Cultural Features of Historical Importance [40 CFR 228.6 (a) 11].
There are no recorded shipwrecks in the vicinity of the alternative ODMDS's
(Berman 1972; Coastal Environments, Inc., 1977; Fischer, Personal Communica-
tion, 1987; Lytle 1975; NDAA n.d.). Thus, no impact to cultural resources
would be expected to occur frcm the use of either ODMDS. There are no
natural features of historical importance in the vicinity of the alternative
COMDS's. These results have been coordinated with the Florida State
Historic Preservation Officer (See Section 7.0).
5.13 The Dumping of Materials into the Ocean will be Permitted Oily at
Sites or in Areas Selected to Minimize the Interference of Disposal
Activities with Other Activities in the Marine Environment, Particularly
Avoiding Areas of Existing Fisheries or Shellfisheries, and Regions of Heavy
Commercial or Recreational Navigation [40 CETt 228.5(a)]. The alternative
ODMDS's chosen for detailed evaluation were selected to minimize
interference with other activities of the marine environment. The avoidance
of live or hard bottoms was of paramount concern. The sites were selected
to minimize potential impacts to existing fisheries or shellfisheries and to
avoid any direct impact to navigation safety fairways, channels or anchorage
areas. As discussed in Section 5.09 above, two artificial reefs are located
within the southeast quadrant of alternative Site B and the artificial reef
knewn as the 'Russian Freighter' is located on the eastern boundary of the
site. There are no permitted or natural reef areas in the vicinity of Site
C. In addition to possible impacts to the artificial reefs, use of the
western portion of Site B could conflict with the designation of this area
as a navigation safety fairway. Use of Site C would not pose these possible
conflicts.
5-7
-------
5.14 Locations and Boundaries of Disposal Sites will be so Chosen that
Temporary Perturbations in Water Quality or other Environmental Conditions
during Initial Mixing caused by Disposal Operations Anywhere within the Site
can be Expected to be Reduced to Normal Ambient Seawater Levels or to
Undetectable Contaminant Concentrations or Effects Before Reaching Any
Beach, Shoreline, Marine Sanctuary, or Known Geographically Limited Fisher
or Shellfishery [40 CFft 228.5(b)]. The temporary perturbations in water
quality resulting from the disposal of dredged material are expected to be
reduced to ambient or undetectable levels within a short distance frcm the
release point. The location and boundaries of the alternative ODMDS's were
chosen to avoid impacts to any beach, shoreline or marine sanctuary. There
are no known geographically limited fisheries or shellfisheries near the
alternative ODMDS's; however, the National Marine Fisheries Service
periodically restricts the taking of certain species in gulf waters; i.e.,
King and Spanish mackerel, grouper, redfish and red snapper. Hie extremely
small area of the alternative ODMDS's in relation to the gulf waters
affected by the ban would make any potential impact to these species
negligible.
5.15 If at Anytime During or After Disposal Site Evaluation Studies, it is
Determined that Existing Disposal Sites Presently Approved on an Interim
Basis for Ocean Dumping Do Not Meet the Criteria For Site Selection Set
Forth in CEH 228.5 and 228.6, the Use of Such Sites will be Terminated-as
soon as Alternate Disposal Sites can be Designated [40 CTR 228.5(c)]. This
criteria is not applicable to the initial selection and designation of an
ODMDS.
5.16 The Sizes of Ocean Disposal Sites will be Limited in Order to Localize
for Identification and Control any Immediate Adverse Impacts and Permit the
Implementation of Effective Monitoring and Surveillance Programs to Prevent
Adverse Long-Range Impacts. The Size, Configuration, and Location of a
Disposal Site will be Determined as Part of the Disposal Site Evaluation or
Designation Study [40 CFR 228.5(d) ]T The size of the ODMDS will be limited
to localize any adverse impacts and to facilitate monitoring and
surveillance of the site designated. The results of the modeling simulation
discussed in Section 5.02 above will be utilized to define the actual size
and location of the site. In the absence of this information, it is
estimated that approximately 6 square miles will be included in the ODMDS.
A smaller disposal area would have potential problems with respect to
impacts occurring outside the disposal area. The nature of the material,
fine-grained sediments, and the physical oceanographic conditions require
that a larger site be designated. A management plan for use of the ODMDS
will be established utilizing the results of the modeling effort and
information on location of significant resources. This management plan will
specify location(s) and method of disposal. In addition, a monitoring
program will be implemented at the designated ODMDS to determine whether or
not disposal at the site is significantly affecting adjacent areas and to
detect the presence of long-term adverse effects. The proposed monitoring
program is discussed in Appendix G. Results of this monitoring program will
be used to modify, if necessary, aspects of the management plan.
5-8
-------
5.17 EPA will, Wherever Feasible, Designate Ocean Dunping Sites Beyond the
Edge of the Continental Shelf and Other Such Sites that Have Been
Historically Used [40 CFR 228.5(e)H There are economic and environmental
factors that make designation of an ODMDS beyond the edge of the continental
shelf in the area of Pensacola infeasible. It is not considered to be
economically feasible to haul the large volume of dredged material beyond
twenty miles frcm Pensacola Pass. Also, the habitats within the Gulf of
Mexico south of Pensacola become more environmentally sensitive with
increasing depth. Coral and other invertebrate fauna occurs on rock
outcrops at depths of 80 to 100 feet and becomes more numerous with
increasing depth (EPA 1986).
The Pensacola nearshore designated site has been restricted to receive
dredged material that is of a predominantly sandy nature; therefore, the use
of this site for fine grained material is not feasible.
5.18 The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and
the Maintenance and Enhancement of Loncj-Term Productivity. The designation
and use of the ODMDS should not significantly affect the long-term
productivity of the site. The construction of artificial fishing reefs on
the designated ODMDS would be prohibited; however, the ODMDS is very small
compared to the continental shelf near Pensacola and adequate space is
available for constructing artificial reefs such that no long-term impact to
productivity of organisms associated with these structures would result.
Commercial and sport fishing near the ODMDS would not be significantly
affected because the site is not known to be located in a limited fishery
area. It is not anticipated that short-term perturbations at the site will
significantly affect the long-term productivity of the region.
5.19 Irreversible or Irretrievable Commitment of Resources. Resources
irreversibly or irretrievably committed by use of the designated ODMDS
include the loss of fuel and monetary resources used to transport the
dredged material and the loss of benthic organisms smothered during disposal
operations. The manpower, energy and monetary resources required to monitor
the ODMDS would also be irreversibly and irretrievably committed.
5.20 Relationship of the Proposed Action to Other Federal Projects.
Designation of an ODMDS for fine grained material could potentially lead to
its use for other Federal projects. The most likely project to require use
of the site would be maintenance of the Pensacola Bay portion of the
commercial ship channel. Federally permitted private dredging projects
could also use the ODMDS in the future. However, none of the other projects
could use the site without proper permitting, environmental documentation
and testing of the dredged material. Only material that meets the ocean
dunping criteria would be allowed to be discharged on the site.
5.21 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Effects and Mitigation Measures.
The disposal of dredged material on the designated ODMDS would result in
unavoidable environmental impacts such as temporary increases in turbidity,
some heavy metals and nutrients. Most of the benthic infauna in the
discharge area would be destroyed. However, the benthic infauna would be
expected to recover over a 12 to 18 month period after the discharge is
5-9
-------
completed. Changes in the site's bathymetry and altering of the site's
sediment composition are also unavoidable impacts. Sane of the adverse
environmental effects associated with disposal activities can be reduced
through proper management of the QDMDS. The mounding of material can be
controlled by strict enforcement of the dump location and by periodically
surveying the site's bathymetry. Hie loss of benthic organisms and effects
outside the ODMDS can be minimized by confining discharges to the central
portion of the ODMDS. A monitoring program will be implemented at the
designated ODMDS to measure impacts and to help prevent any adverse long-
range impacts. The proposed monitoring program is presented in Appendix G.
5-10
-------
TABLE 5-1
SUMMARY OF THE SPECIFIC CRITERIA AS
APPLIED TO ALTERNATIVE ODMDS's
Criteria as Listed in
40 CFR 228.6
1. Geographical
position, depth of
water, bottcm
topography and distance
from coast.
2. Location in
relation to breeding,
spawning, nursery,
feeding, or passage
of living resource in
adult or juvenile
phases.
3. Locations in
relation to beaches
and other fishing
amenity areas.
4. Types and
quantities of wastes
proposed to be
disposed of and
proposed methods of
release, including
methods of packing
the wastes, if any.
5. Feasibility of
surveillance and
monitoring.
6. Dispersal,
horizontal transport,
and vertical mixing
characteristics of
the area, including
prevailing current
velocity, if any.
Site B
See Figures 5-1 and
4-1; 65-88 feet;
relatively flat; 7
miles from coast
May occur within area
but no unique uses are
known; nearest known
nursery or passage
areas are 7 miles or
more frcm site
Located 7 miles frcm
beaches and 4 miles
frcm aquatic preserve;
one permitted and two
existing artificial
reefs within site
Initially,
approximately 4.1 mcy
of sand, silt, and
clay released by
hopper dredge, barge,
or dump scow
Surveillance and
monitoring possible
by boat or plane
Currents are parallel
to coast at speeds
of up to 50 cm/sec
under normal weather
conditions; may
reach 100 cm/sec
during hurricanes
Site C
See Figures 5-1 and
4-1; 60-95 feet;
relatively flat; 11
miles from coast
May occur within area
but no unique uses are
known; nearest known
nursery or passage
areas are 11 miles or
more frcm site
Located 11 miles frcm
beaches and 8 miles
frcm aquatic preserve
two proposed artificial
reefs within site; two
proposed reefs east
of site
Same as Site B
Same as Site B
Same as Site B
5-11
-------
TABLE 5-1
(continued)
SUMMARY OF THE SPECIFIC CRITERIA AS
APPLIED TO ALTERNATIVE ODMDS's
Criteria as Listed
in 40 CER 228.6
7. Existence and
effects of current
and previous discharge
and dumping in the
in the area including
cumulative effects.
8. Interference with
shipping, fishing,
recreation, mineral
extraction,
desalination, fish and
shellfish culture,
areas of special
scientific importance,
and other legitimate
uses of the ocean.
9. The existing water
quality and ecology of
the sites as determined
by available data, and
by baseline surveys.
10. Potentiality for
the development or
recruitment of
nuisance species in
the disposal sites.
11. Existence at or
in close proximity to
the site of any
significant natural
or cultured features of
historical importance.
Site B
No previous
discharges
Site C
No previous
discharges
50% of site overlaps
safety fairway, no
direct discharge
allowed; three
artificial reefs in
site; other parameters
would not be affected
Water quality typical
of gulf waters and
bottom habitat typical
of sandy bottom
habitat in gulf
No nuisance species
are anticipated
No known impacts to
cultural resources or
any significant
natural resource
33% of site overlaps
safety fairway, no
direct discharge
allowed; other
panimeters would not
be affected
Same as Site B
Same as Site B
Same as Site B
5-12
-------
-------
6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS,
preparing this EIS:
The following people were primarily responsible for
Name/Education/
Organization
Henry A. Malec, M.E.
Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
Susan Ivester Rees, Ph.D.
Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
Dorothy H. Gibbens, M.S.
Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
R. Douglas Nester, M.S.
Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
Reginald G. Rogers, M.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IV
Christian M. Hoberg, M.S.
Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IV
Laurens M. Pitts, M.E.
Navy Facilities
Engineering Command
Expertise/Experience
Environmental Engineer:
15 years experience
environmental studies.
Oceanographer: 13 years
experience in coastal
navigation, beach nourish-
ment and education.
Archaeologist: 13 years
experience as cultural
resources specialist.
Biologist: 10 years
experience in biological
studies.
Ecologist: 29 years
experience in coastal
studies.
Environmental Scientist:
10 years experience in
marine studies, EIS
review.
Environmental Engineer:
16 years experience
in environmental
studies
Contribution
EIS Coordination
EIS Preparation,
Site Designation
Studies
Cultural
Resources
Fisheries
EPA Coordination
EIS Review
EPA Coordination
EIS Review
Navy Coordination
6-1
-------
7.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT. This Draft Environmental Imyact Statement is being
coordinated with the following agencies, groups, and individuals:
Federal
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Council on Environmental Quality
Department of Agriculture
Forest Service
Soil Conservation Service
Department of Commerce
National Marine Fisheries Service
National Ocean Survey
Office of Coastal Zone Management
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of the Interior
Bureau of Mines
Fish and Wildlife Service
Minerals Management Service
National Park Service
U.S. Geological Survey
Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Highway Administration
U.S. Coast Guard
Department of Defense
Pentagon
U.S. Air Force, Eglin Air Force Base
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Jacksonville District
Mobile District
U.S. Navy
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Southern Division Naval Engineering Facilities Ccmmand
Economic Development Administration
Environmental Government Affairs
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Power Commission
Food and Drug Administration
National Aeroautics and Space Administration
National Science Foundation
U.S. Senators
Honorable Lawton Chiles
Honorable Bob Graham
U.S. House of Representatives
Honorable Earl Hut to
7-1
-------
State
Governor of Florida
Honorable Bob Martinez
Florida Senate
Honorable W.D. Qiilders (1st. District)
Florida House of Representatives
Honorable Tan Tobiassen (1st. District)
Honorable Virginia Bass (2nd. District)
Honorable Tan Benjamin (3rd. District)
Honorable Bolley L. Johnson (4th. District)
Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Agriculture Advisory Council
Division of Forestry
Soil and Water Conservation Office
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Bureau of Laboratories and Special Projects
Bureau of Permitting
Bureau of Sanitary Engineering
Bureau of Special Programs
Groundwater Administration
NPDES Permits
Florida Department of General Services
Florida Department of Legal Affairs
Florida Department of Natural Resources
Bureau of Beaches and Shores
Coastal Coordinating Council
Division of Marine Resources
Division of Recreation and Parks
Florida Department of State
Bureau of Publication
Department of Archives, History and Records Management
Florida Department of Transportation
Bureau of Environment
Director of Road Operations
State Topographic Bureau
Florida Environmental Regulation Canmission
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Canmission
Florida Secretary of State's Office
Florida State Health Officer
Florida State Historic Preservation Officer
Florida State Treasure's Office
Northwest Florida Regional Planning Canmission
Northwest Florida Water Management District
Office of the Governor
Office of Planning and Budgetting
State Planning and Development Clearinghouse
Florida Marine Fisheries Canmission
7-2
-------
local
Apalachee Regional Planning Council
Escambia County Commission
Manager, City of Pensaoola
Mayor of Pensaoola
Honorable Vince Whibbs
West Florida Regional Planning Council
Pensacola Port Authority
University of Wfest Florida
Pensaoola Public Library
Pensacola Chamber of Commerce
Pensacola News Journal
Organizations and Public
Action
AGC
Alachua Conservation Council
Bay County Audubon Society
Citizens Committee 100
Conservation
Council on Clean Air
Ecology Action of Hollywood
Ecology Unlimited - Manatee Junior College
Environmental Action Group
University of Florida
Florida State University
Florida Presbyterian College
Environmental Affairs Ad Hoc Committee - Florida State University
Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida
Environmental Demonstration Center - Miami-Dade Community College
Environmental Information Center of the Florida Conservation Fund, Inc.
Envisions, Inc.
Florida Bass Chapter
Florida Coalition for Clean Water
Florida Conservation Foundation, Inc.
Florida Division IWLA
Florida Forestry Association
Florida League of Anglers, Inc.
Florida Local Environmental Regulation Association
Florida Lung Association
Florida Sea Grant Extension Program
Florida Soil and water Conservation Council
Florida State UAW-CAP Council - Environmental Committee
Florida State University
fMCCA
Gulf Coast TB
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission
7-3
-------
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute
Hillsborough Environmental Coalition
Information
International Women's Fishing Association
Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Lemon Bay Conservancy
Mana-Sota 88
Marine Environmental Sciences Consortium, Dauphin Island Sea Lab
Mote Marine Laboratory
National Audubon Society
National Wildlife Federation
Natural Resources Defense Council
Nature Conservancy
NE Florida Air Conservation Council
North Broward Environmental Action Ccmmittee
Organized Fisherman of Florida
Polk County Coalition for the Environment
Racal Survey, Inc.
Save Our Bays Association, Inc.
Sierra Club
Southeastern Fisheries Association, Inc.
Sport Fish Institute, Artificial Reef Development Center
Survive
Suwannee River Coalition
Trout Unlimited
University of Florida
University of Miami - RSMAS
University of South Alabama
University of South Florida
West Florida Lung Association
Wildlife Society - University of Florida
Ybor City Civitan Club
In addition, coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as required by Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 has been concluded. The National Marine Fisheries
Service in a letter dated December 14, 1987 concurred with the determination
that populations of endangered/threatened species under their purview would
not be adversely affected by the proposed action. The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service in a letter dated February 18, 1987 concurred with the
determination that populations of endangered/threatened species under their
jurisdiction would not be adversely affected by the proposed action. Should
additional information become available concerning possible impacts or
should the activity be modified, additional consultation would be requested.
Also, coordination with the Florida State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) has been completed. In a letter dated March 16, 1988, the SHPO
stated: " it is the opinion of this agency that the proposed offshore
dredge disposal will have no affect on any properties listed, or eligible
for listing, in The National Register of Historic Places."
7-4
-------
/y\
• I •
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Southeast Regional Office
9450 Koger Boulevard
St. Petersburg, FL 33702
December 14, 1987 F/SER23:TAH:td
Mr. N. D. McClure IV
Chief, Environment and Resources Branch
Department of the Army
Mobile District, Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 2288
Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001
Dear Mr. McClure:
This responds to your November 17, 1987, letter regarding the
proposed designation of new ocean dredged material disposal sites
(ODMDS) in the Gulf of Mexico south of Pensacola, Florida. You
stated that additional studies have been conducted to better
define the location of the ODMDS and enclosed a map with
coordinates of the proposed sites. The Navy's Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) served as the Biological Assessment (BA)
for the proposed project pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973.
We have reviewed the EIS and concur with your determination that
populations of endangered/threatened species under our purview
would not be adversely affected by the proposed action.
This concludes consultation responsibilities under Section 7 of
the ESA. However, consultation should be reinitiated if new
information reveals impacts of the identified activity that may
affect listed species or their critical habitat, a new species is
listed, the identified activity is subsequently modified or
critical habitat determined that may be affected by the proposed
activity.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Terry Henwood,
Fishery Biologist at FTS 826-3366.
Sincerely yours
Charles A. Oravetz, Chief
Protected Species Management Branch
cc: F/PR2
F/SER1
7-5
-------
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
ENDANGERED SPECIES FIELD STATION
2747 ART MUSEUM DRIVE
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32207
February 18, 1987
Commanding Officer
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Southern Division
Department of the Navy
2155 Eagle Drive, P.O. Box 10068
Charleston, S.C. 29411-0068
Dear Sir:
This 1s 1n response to your letter of February 4, 1987 regarding the
Section 7 consultation process for the United States Navy Gulf Coast
Strategic Homeportlng sites 1n Pensacola and Key West, Florida.
We have reviewed the information provided 1n the August 1986 Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the January 1987 Final EIS.
With regard to the proposed homeportlng facility, we concur with the
Navy's determination of "no adverse effect" to the following species:
West Indian manatee, bald eagle, red-cockaded woodpecker, and eastern
Indigo snake. We also concur with the Navy's determination of "no
adverse effect" to the Perdldo Key beach mouse from the construction
of the homeportlng, facility at Pensacola, Florida, as long as the
conditions stated 1n your February 4, 1987 letter are met. If these
conditions are adhered to, and the safety of beach mice present on the
site 1s ensured, we do not feel the construction of the project will
adversely affect the existence of the Perdldo Key beach mouse.
This does not constitute a Biological Opinion as described In
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. However, 1t does satisfy the
requirements of the Act and no further action on your part 1s
required. If modifications are made In the project or 1f additional
facts involving potential impacts on listed spedes arise, you should
contact this office.
FWS Log No. 4-1-87-084
11000, Code 202LP
Sincerely yours,
David J. Wesley
Field Supervisor
7-6
-------
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Jim Smith
Secretary of State
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
R.A. Gray Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
March 16, 1988 (904)488-1480
Mr. Earl G. Baham
Hoad, Planning Services Branch
Department of Navy
Commanding Officer, Southern Division
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
P.O. Box 10068
Charleston, S.C. 29411-0068
In Reply Refer To:
Louis D. Tesar
Historic Preservation
Supervisor
(904) 487-2333
Project File No. 880446
RE: October 27, 1987 letter, code 202LP
Cultural resource assessment request for proposed
dredge disposal from Pensacola Harbor Homeporting
Project at coordinates:
87° 23'00" 30° 05'00"
87° 23*00" 30° 15 ' 0 0 "
87° ll'OO" 30° 15'00"
87° ll'OO" 30° 15'00"
Gulf of Mexico, Florida
Dear Mr. Baham:
In accordance with the procedures contained in 36 C.F.R.,
Part 800 ("Procedures for the Protection of Historic and Cultural
Properties") , we have reviewed the above referenced project for
possible impact to archaeological and historical sites or
properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National
Ronjster of Historic Places. The authorities for these
procedures are the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
(Public Law 89-665) as amended by P.L. 91-243, P.L. 93-54, P.L.
04-422, P.L. 94-458 and P.L. 96-515, and Presidential Executive
Order 11593 ("Protection
.will Enhancement of the Cultural Environment").
As we discussed with your staff and the staff archaeologists
in the office of the Mobile District, Corps of Engineers, we are
ooncorned with the continuing exposure and erosion of shipwreck
viMiuiins and the remains of Ft. McRae on the west side of the
ivns.icola Bay entrance channel and along Perdido Key. This
p»oblem is the result of sand starving as the westward littoral
.11 i f t along Santa Rosa Island gets trapped in the Pensacola Bay.
i-'.n that reason in order to minimize or avoid the adverse impact
ti> significant archaeological resources, which would occur within
t lw* subject are do to increased erosion scour as a result of the
i-li.umol deepening, we recommend that all soil suitable for beach
7-7
\n h.n .>l.yu.il Research Florida Folklife Programs Mi«:oric Preservation Museum of Florida History
4.x?-::oo (9041 397-2192 ¦ViHiT-ZMi 19041488-1484
-------
Mr. Earl G. Baham
March 16th, 1988
Pnge 2
nourishment be used as such along the west bank of the channel
(the east end of Perdido Key) and along the Gulf beach of Perdido
Key.
With respect to the disposal of other dredge materials
within the above cited open water coordinates, then even though
wo have identified potentially significant historic shipwrecks
within that area (as well as several non-historic shipwrecks and
artificial fish reefs important to the local fishing economy), we
would have to conclude that its use as a dredge disposal site
would not affect the qualities which make such shipwrecks
eligible for listing in the National Register. Thus, if the
clean sand is used for beach nourishment, it is the opinion of
this agency that the proposed offshore dredge disposal will have
no affect on any properties listed, or eligible for listing, in
The Nat ional Reg ister of Historic Places.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact our office. Your interest and cooperation in
helping to protect Florida's archaeological and historical
resources are appreciated.
Sincerely,
^^George W. Percy, Director
Division of Historical Resources and
State Historic Preservation Officer
GWP/Tgv
rr: Dottie Gibbons
7-8
-------
8.0 REFERENCES
Berman, Bruce D. 1972. Encyclopedia of American Shipwrecks, Mariner Press.
Coastal Environments, Inc. 1977. Cultural Resources Evaluation of the
Northern Gulf of Mexico Continental Shelf, Volume II, Historical Cultural
Resources, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C.
Darnell, Rezneat M. and Joanie A. Kleypas. 1987. Eastern Gulf Shelf Bio-
Atlas. U.S. Department of the Interior/toinerals Management Service. OCS
Study MMS 86-0041.
Fischer, George W. National Park Service, Southeast Conservation Archeology
Center, Tallassee, FL, Personal Ccranunication, October 15, 1987.
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 1987. The Fishery Management
Plan for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico U:.ited States Waters.
Lytle, W. M. and F. R. Holdcamper. 1975. Merchant Steam Vessels of the
United States 1709 - 1868, Staten Island.
Minerals Management Service, Personal Ccmnunications, Doug Elvers, November
4, 1987.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NCAA). 1986. Local
Climatological Data, 1985 Annual Summary with Comparative Data, Pensacola,
Florida.
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, n.d. Automated
Wreck and Obstruction Inventory System.
Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity (NORDA). 1987. Currents off
Pensacola, Florida, by R. L. Pickett and D. A. Burns, NSTL Station, MS.
Pequegnat, W. E., D. D. 9mith, R. M. Darnell, B. J. Presley, and R. O. Reid.
1978. An assessment of the potential impact of dredged material disposal
in the open ocean. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, MS. Tech. Rpt. D-78-2. 642 pp.
Pybas, Donald W. 1986. Atlas of Artificial Reef in Florida. Florida Sea
Grant Extension Bulletin No. 13.
Simmons, E. G. and W. H. Thcmas. 1962. Phytoplankton of the eastern
Mississippi Delta. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. 8:269-298.
State University System Florida Institute of Oceanography (SUSIO). 1975.
Final report on the baseline environmental survey of the MAFIA lease areas
CY 1974. A report to the Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC.,
Contract No. 08550-CT5-30. State University System Florida Institute of
Oceanography. St. Petersburg, FL. 5 Volumes.
8-1
-------
U.S. Department of Interior (DOI). 1974. Final environmental impact
statement outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sale 36. Bureau of
Land Management, Washington, DC. 3 Volumes.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1988a. effects of sediment
fran two locations near the Pensacola, Florida, Nav; 1 Air Station on
representative marine organisms.
1988b. Chemical analyses of sediment from two sites near the Pensacola,
Florida, Naval Air Station and tissues of marine organisms exposed to the
sediment.
1987. Field Evaluation Studies of Alternative Dredged Material Disposal
Areas off Pensacola, Florida, 1987.
1986. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Pensacola, FL,
Mobile, AL, and Gulfport, MS Dredged Material Disposal Site Designation.
U.S. Navy (Navy). 1987. Final Environmental Impact Statenent, United
States Navy Gulf Coast Strategic Haneporting. Southern Division Naval
Engineering Facilities Command, Charleston, SC. 2 Volumes.
8-2
-------
APPENDIX A
SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE
OCEAN DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES
-------
APPENDIX A
SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE OCEAN DREDGED
MATERIAL DISPOSAL SITES
1. Introduction. Alternative Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites
(ODMDS's) were selected for detailed evaluation based on environmental and
economic considerations as outlined in Pequegnat et al., 1981. A site
designated for ocean disposal of dredged materials must be located within an
economically and operationally feasible radius from the point of dredging
called a Zone of Siting Feasibility (ZSF). Factors used in determining the
ZSF included: (1) cost of transporting dredged material to the disposal
site; (2) type of dredging/disposal equipment; (3) navigation restrictions;
and (4) political boundaries. Once the ZSF was established, an interagency
team reviewed existing information to determine areas within the ZSF which
should be eliminated for environmental reasons. The results of the
selective screening process are presented in the following paragraphs.
2. Establishment of the ZSF. It was determined that a 20-mile radius from
Pensacola Pass provided an economic haul distance for the material to be
dredged from the turning basin at the Pensacola Naval Air Station (Figure A-
1). In addition, the most likely dredging and disposal plant, hopper
barges, could easily work within this area of the Gulf of Mexico. The
western edge of the 20-mile radius extends into waters of the State of
Alabama, therefore this area was eliminated from consideration as part of
the ZSF. With the exception of the restrictions associated with the Federal
navigation channel at Pensacola no other navigation restrictions apply to
this area.
3. Navigation Channels, Anchorage Areas, and Safety Fairways. The entrance
channel to Pensacola Bay extends approximately three miles into the Gulf of
Mexico and is the only navigation channel that could potentially be affected
by the ODMDS. As shown on Figure A-2, a 1-mile buffer zone was established
adjacent to the channel to prevent any significant amount of material from
being carried back into the channel. Also shewn on Figure A-2 are the
anchorage areas and navigation safety fairways. These areas were not
specifically excluded from consideration as an ODMDS since they are located
in deep water and the ODMDS could be managed in a way that would not
conflict with their designated use.
4. Beaches and Recreation Areas. Due to the nature of the material to be
initially disposed in this site, predominately fine-grained materials, a
very conservative buffer zone was established to avoid any possibility of
impacting the beaches and recreation areas on Santa Rr-sa Island and Perdido
Key. These areas are known for their white sand beaches and clear blue
waters and it was felt that a 5-mile buffer zone was required to eliminate
the possibility of impact to these valuable resources (Figure A-3).
A-l
-------
5. Biologically Sensitive Areas. Within this area of the northern Gulf
coast, one major biologically sensitive resource are areas of live bottoms.
In addition to these areas, considerable resources have been expended for
the creation of artificial reefs which serve as significant fish havens.
Other biologically sensitive areas include fish nursery, spawning, and
migratory areas. The continental shelf is highly irregular off Pensacola
and its sand sheet thins toward the east, where limestone karst topography
predominates. Coral and other invertebrate growth occurs on rock outcrops
at depths of 80 to 100 feet and becomes more numerous with increasing depth.
Therefore, water depths greater than 100 feet were eliminated from
consideration. The eastern quadrant of the area within a 20-mile radius of
Pensacola Pass was also eliminated from consideration because of the
potential for hard bottoms. This includes all the area to the east of a
north-south line located seven miles from Pensacola Pass as shown on Figure
A-4. Artificial reefs are shewn on Figure A-5 and generally a 1-mile buffer
zone was established around existing and permitted reefs. The exception to
this was the existing reef in the southeast quadrant of Site B and the reef
known as the "Russian Freighter" located on the east boundary of Site B.
Little specific information was available relative to fishery resource
areas? however, the tidal pass and nearshore areas are known to be heavily
utilized during spawning and migration. These areas had already been
excluded from consideration in the 5-mile buffer zone established to protect
the beaches and recreational areas and it was felt that this buffer was also
adequate to protect spawning and migration.
6. Aquatic Preserves. The Fort Pickens Aquatic Preserve is shown on Figure
A-6. This Preserve was established by the State of Florida to provide an
aesthetic buffer around the State Park on Santa Rosa Island. The 5-mile
buffer zone established to protect the beaches and recreational areas is
considered to be adequate to protect the aquatic preserve.
7. Other Factors. Other factors were considered during the selective
screening process including: mineral resource exploration, cultural
resources, and the feasibility for monitoring and sur\eillance of the ODMDS.
All of these factors were considered but no additional areas were eliminated
from consideration because of them.
8. Selection of Alternative ODMDS's. Figure A-7 presents a composite of
all the areas eliminated from consideration as an ODMDS. Hie area remaining
in consideration was reviewed by personnel from the State of Florida and
Corps of Engineers in coordination with the EPA and the Navy to identify
alternative ODMDS's for detailed evaluation. Bottom contours were used to
select areas to be evaluated in detail. Areas of greatest relief were
avoided since they represent areas with the highest probability of
containing live/hard bottoms. Based on this review, three areas were
selected for detailed consideration. These three alternative ODMDS's are
shown on Figure A-8. Two of the sites (A and B) are within the State of
Florida's coastal waters (10.4 statute miles) and one site (Site C) is
beyond the limit of state waters.
A-2
-------
8. Study Approach. Once the three alternative ODMDS's were selected, more
detailed studies were planned and initiated. The first phase of study was
to survey the alternative ODMDS's using side scan sonar to characterize the
bottom and to locate any potential live/hard bottoms that should be avoided.
Alternative sites could be eliminated and additional ODMDS's selected if
live/hard bottom communities were encountered at any of the selected sites.
However, these initial surveys at Sites B and C indicated little possibility
for live/hard bottoms; they were considered to be the two most viable
alternatives and a survey of Site A was not initiated. Hie tasks and
methods used during the detailed studies of Sites B and C are discussed in
the following paragraphs.
9. Side Scan Sonar. The initial task was a bathymetric survey using side
scan sonar for characterizing the bottom and search for potential live/hard
bottom communities. Using a 100 KH transponder, transects traversing each
site were navigated at approximately 800-foot intervals. The goal was to
achieve a 40-percent overlap between transects. Actually, transect overlaps
ranged between 15 to 65 percent during the survey due to varying sea states
affecting the ship's course. Along each transect, navigation fixes of
latitude and longitude were entered on the ship's plotter and reoorded along
with a tape recorded verbal interpretation of the sid<; scan chart.
Accordingly, a real time analysis of the side scan information was
acconplished. If side scan sonar images of suspect bottom characteristics
were encountered at any point along the transect of suspect bottom
characteristics, coordinates for such areas were reoorded for subsequent
investigation by divers or Remotely Operated Vehicle (RCW). In all, a total
of 31 transects were conducted at Site B and 30 transects at Site C.
10. Photographic Records. The second task associated with site clearing
involved the use of a towed camera sled to obtain continuous video records
of transects spaced at 800-foot intervals covering each 6-square mile site.
Along each individual transect, navigation fixes of latitude and longitude
were recorded along with depth and entered on the ship's plotter. Spacing
between each fix was also at intervals of approximately 800 feet.
A total of 19 transects, each approximately 2 miles long, were completed at
Site C. Hie video survey of Site B was expanded eastward of the originally
delimited area which resulted in a total of 31 transects. Two
circumferential courses spaced at 800- and 1600-foot distances outside the
perimeter of each site and outside the termination of the 2-mile transects
were initiated, but were not completed in February 1987 due to foul weather
and technical problems which extended the length of the survey. These
surveys could not be completed in February because of the ship's schedule.
Another attempt to complete these transects in April 1987 was unsuccessful
because turbidity precluded acceptable video clarity. Figures A-9 and A-10
shew the video transects for Sites B and C, respectively.
Still photographs of bottom characteristics were taken by divers during the
benthic sampling at each site. Photographs were taken at random at each of
20 stations at Sites B and C (See Figures A-9 and A-10) during November 1986
and April 1987.
A-3
-------
11. Bottom Sampling. Bottom sampling included sampling for benthic
marcoinvertebrates, sediment chemistry and sediment particle size. These
areas are discussed below and sample stations are shown on Figures A-ll and
A-12. See Appendices C and E for results.
11.1 Benthic Macroinvertebrates. A total of 20 stations were sampled at
each site for benthic macroinvertebrates using round stainless steel hand
cores 10 cm in diameter and 15 cm long. The top end of each corer was
screened with 0.5 mm mesh. At each station, cores were taken by divers.
Each corer was pushed into the sediment to its full length (15 cm), capped
on the bottom end by the diver's hand, momentarily inverted and placed in a
cloth bag which was tightly secured to prevent escape of sediment and
organisms. All samples were sieved through 0.5 mm screens aboard ship,
placed in containers, and immersed in 10% seawater formalin solution with
rose bengal stain for transport to the laboratory. Identifications were
made to the lowest practicable limit, which in most cases was the species
level.
During the November 1986 survey, 15 replicate benthic macroinvertebrate
cores were taken at each station. At two of the 20 stations for each site,
15 additional cores, for a total of 30 reps, were taken to verify whether or
not the species saturation curve could be satisfied with 15 reps. This
information would be used to adjust the replication effort for the April
1987 effect.
The species saturation analysis established that 15 replicates were
sufficient to satisfy the curve at approximately the 80 to 85% level.
Accordingly, 15 replicates were also collected at each station during the
April 1987 survey.
11.2 Sediment Chemistry. During the course of macroinvertebrate sampling,
cores for sediment chemical analysis were collected with Teflon coring
tubes. Consistent with the macroinvertebrate sampling, core penetration was
to the 15 cm depth. All cores were refrigerated and iced for return to the
lab for analysis. Analyses include metals scan, pesticides, chlorinated
hydrocarbons, oil and grease, and nutrients (NH3, NO2+NO3-N, 1KN).
Sampling and analysis for only the metals scan and nutrients were repeated
during the April survey since pesticide, chlorinated hydrocarbon, and oil
and grease concentrations in the November samples were generally below
analytical detection limits.
11.3 Sediment Particle Size. Simultaneous with and in the same manner as
sediment chemistry sampling, cores were also collected during November and
April for sediment particle size analysis. Upon return aboard ship, all
cores were carefully decanted, frozen, and returned to the lab. Processing
was according to the wet sieve Modified Wentworth method.
12. Water Quality Sampling. During the November 1986 and April 1987
surveys, water quality sampling was conducted at eight stations at both Site
B and Site C. Although quarterly water quality sampling was planned,
extremely rough weather and sea conditions aborted sampling in February.
A-4
-------
The final quarterly sampling effort was conducted in August 1987.
Water quality sampling consisted of dissolved oxygen, salinity and
tenperature (DST) profiles at 5-foot increments fran surface to bottom.
Light extinction profiles were determined using 10-foot increments frcm
surface to bottom. After determination of the 90, 50, and 10% light levels,
water samples were collected, ccmposited, and a sanple extracted and
filtered for chlorophyll-a analysis during November and April surveys.
In conjunction with DST profiles, water samples were collected at surface,
mid-depth, and bottan for nutrient analysis.
13. Demersal Fishes. On May 19 and 20, 1987, demersal fishes were
collected at ten stations within each of the two disposal sites. Sampling
was conducted fran the Dauphin Island Sea lab Research vessel, the R/V
Verrill. Hie sampling method utilized was a 40-foot otter trawl, equipped
with a 0.25 inch mesh liner. Sampling began at 1445 hours on May 19, 1987,
and was oanpleted at 0450 hours on May 20, 1987. Travel times were
standardized at 20 minutes. Trawl catches fran each station placed in
separate 5-gallon buckets and fixed with 10 percent formalin. Fish
specimens larger than 4 inches standard length were slit to allow for proper
fixation. Appendix F presents a figure showing station locations and a list
of fishes and invertebrate collected.
A-5
-------
-------
-------
>
1
00
-------
-------
ST4TUTE Uh cc
>
1
safety fairway
a | anchorage area
2
*n2
^om
"V ui
3 SITE C
SAFETY
fairway
-------
N * * * ¦
V \ \
-------
-------
-------
VIDEO TRANSECTS
SITE B
A-14
FIGURE A-9
SITE B
VIDEO TRANSECTS
-------
--09'
--08'
--07'
VIDEO TRANSECTS
SITE C
A-15
FIGURE A-IO
SITE C
VIDEO TRANSECTS
-------
0 2
1 , 1
l_ .l 1
STATUTE MILES
w
14
• •
•
1 2
3
# #
•
10 n
18
174
^ • •
• ®
8 9
/SBk ^
4 15
at
13 12
w
19
« •
•
7 6
5 20
a
w
IG
SITE B
•
SEDIMENT SIZE, CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, STILL PHOTOGRAPHS
0
SEDIMENT ORGANICS
0
WATER QUALITY
FIGURE A-ll
SITE B
SAMPLING STATIONS
A-16
-------
I
STATUTE MILES
•
#
IB
M
•
•
•
1
2
3
w
19
10
W
ii
#
•
•
•
#
17
8
9
A
15
•
#
#
20
13
12
•
•
•
7
6
5
• SITE C
• SEDIMENT SIZE, CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, STILL PHOTOGRAPHS
O SEDIMENT ORGANICS
O WATER QUALITY
FIGURE A-12
SITE C
SAMPLING STATIONS
A-17
-------
APPENDIX B
CURRENTS OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
(R. L. Pickett and D. A. Burns,
Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity
August, 1987)
Chapter 1 Summary-
Chapter 2 Current Analysis
Chapter 3 Model Analysis
-------
Appendix B
CURRENTS OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
R.L. Pickett and D.A. Burns
August, 1987
Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity
NSTL Station, MS 39529 USA
B-l
-------
CHAPTER 1
SUMMARY:
CURRENTS OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
NAVAL OCEAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
NSTL STATION, MS 39529
B-2
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was funded by the Environmental Branch of the Naval
Facilities Engineering Command in Charleston, South Carolina, L.M. Pitts,
P.E., Engineer-in-Charge. The work was performed in NORDA's Physical
Oceanography Branch, headed by Dr. R. Hollman. Field operations were
carried out by Stephen Sova and Richard Myrick of NORDA, and Captain P.
Ladner and crew of the R.V. Tommy Munro. Contract support was provided
by Planning Systems Inc., MEC Systems Corp., and Offshore and Coastal
Technology, Inc. Wind data were provided by the Naval Oceanography
Command Detachment, Naval Air Station, Pensacola, and the National
Climatic Data Center, Ashville, North Carolina.
B-3
-------
ABSTRACT
Five months of observations off Pensacola, Florida showed nearshore
currents were wind driven, parallel to the coast, and attain speeds up to 50
cm/s (1.0 kn). Currents were uniform over horizontal distances of 10 km
(5.4 nmi), and down through the water column.
A numerical current model showed that over long time periods
currents in the region will be stronger and toward the westmore frequently
than those observed during the field period. The model also hindcasted 100
cm/sec (2.0 kn) current speeds during hurricane Fredric in 1979.
B-4
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This paper presents the results of an observation and model study of
currents off Pensacola, Florida. The purpose of this work was to document
currents in potential dredge spoil sites, as pan of the U.S. Navy's homeport
project. Chapter 1 summarizes results, Chapter 2 provides current analysis
details, and Chapter 3 describes model simulations. For the observational
program, four moorings with mid-depth and near-bottom current meters
were placed approximately 20 km (10.7 nmi) south of Pensacola in about 20
m (65.6 ft) of water (Figure 1). Current data were collected from February
to June 1987. During this same period, wind data were recorded at
Pensacola.
For the model study, the above observations were used to calibrate a
numerical current model. This calibrated model was then used to hindcast
currents in the same region using winds observed during the past 40 years.
In essence, the study showed that currents off Pensacola are wind
driven and parallel to the coast.
II. METHOD
A. Data
Eight calibrated acoustic current meters were placed in four
subsurface, taut-mooring arrays (each containing current meters at 9 m
(29.5 ft) below the surface, and 4 m (13.2 ft) above the bottom) off
Pensacola. Four arrays were used to estimate spacial variability of the
currents.
The four current meter locations A, B, C and D, are shown in Figure 1.
Currents were recorded from 6 February to 7 April 1987 at locations A and
B, and from 13 March to 18 June 1987 at locations C and D. The 4-minute
current samples recorded by the meters were edited, then averaged over
one hour intervals to eliminate meter noise and turbulence.
Wind speed and direction are routinely recorded at both the Naval Air
Station and the commercial airport in Pensacola. The wind records covering
the same time period as the current data were extracted, edited, and
averaged in the same manner.
B-5
-------
Figure 1. The four current meter sites south of Pensacola, Florida. Two
current meters (one at 9 m (29.5 ft) below the surface, one at 4 m (13.1 ft)
above the bottom) were installed at each site from February until June
1987. The dashed line is the 20 m (65.6 ft) isobath.
B-6
-------
B. Model
A 10-layer, 3.7 km (2 nmi) grid, numerical current model was driven
with observed winds. The bottom roughness coefficient was adjusted
until the model output matched the current meter readings.
Next, the model was run for a variety of winds that have been
recorded at Pensacola since 1948. The object was to calibrate the model
with observed currents, and then use it to estimate currents in other
seasons and years. Model currents were analyzed in the same manner as
the recorded currents.
III. RESULTS
A. Current Data
Over the current meter array spacing (about 10 km (5.4 nmi)), all
current meter records were nearly identical during the observation period.
As a result, combined statistics and histograms were calculated.
The mean current speed over the entire period (February to June
1987) for all current meters near 9 m (29.5 ft) below the surface was 14
cm/s (0.3 kn), and the standard deviation was 9 cm/s (0.2 kn). The mean
speed over the period for all meters near 4 m (13.1 ft) above the bottom
was 11 cm/s (0.2 kn), and the standard deviation was 6 cm/s (0.1 kn).
The frequency of occurrence of any current speed during the
observation period can be estimated from the combined histograms in
Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 shows that observed mid-depth currents exceeded
22 cm/s (0.4 kn) 20% of the time. Figure 3 shows that observed
near-bottom currents exceeded 16 cm/s (0.3 kn) 2 J% of the time.
Currents were generally parallel to the coast, which runs slightly
northeast of due east. Figure 4 shows the directions of all mid-depth
currents, and Figure 5 shows directions of near-bottom currents. At
mid-depths, 38% of the observed currents were toward the east and
northeast, and 41% toward the west and southwest. Near the bottom, 42%
were toward the east and northeast, while 36% were toward the west and
southwest. Hence currents parallel to the coast in both directions occurred
about equally as often.
The currents contained two major periodic components. The high-speed
component had roughly a 5-day period, and corresponded to weather
B-7
-------
o
CURRENT SPEED (CH/S)
Figure 2. Current speed probability plots for all currents 9 m (29.5 ft)
below the surface for all locations in Figure 1. Solid line is for observed
currents from February to June 1987, and dashed line is for modeled
currents from 1948 to present.
B-8
-------
o
CURRENT SPEED (CM/S)
Figure 3. Same as Figure 2 except for currents 4 m (13.1 ft) above bottom.
B-9
-------
Figure 4. Cumulative direction plots for all observed currents 9 m (29.5 ft)
below the surface for all locations in Figure 1 from February to June 1987.
North is at the top, and the bars show directions currents are going toward
(e.g., most currents were going toward the east). Dotted circles are percent
of time, thin bars are 0-15, next thickest 15-30, next thickest 30-45, and
thickest bars are greater than 45 cm/s 0.88 kn).
B-10
-------
Figure 5. Same as Figure 4, except for currents 4 m above the bottom.
B-ll
-------
changes. As fronts moved through the area, the wind-driven currents
moved with the east-west component of the wind. However, there was a lag
between winds and currents; the currents peaked about 17 hours after the
wind.
The low-speed periodic component was at 24 hours, and was due to the
tide. Tidal currents were generally an order of magnitude smaller than
wind-driven currents, and tended to rotate clockwise.
The winds directions were more scattered than the current directions.
For the winter-spring 1987 observation period, winds were often from the
north as Figure 6 shows.
B. Model Runs
The frequency of various current speeds over long time periods (40
years), was estimated by running the model with historical winds. The
histograms in Figures 2 and 3 show these model results. Figure 2 shows
that, over long time periods (and hence many severe storms), mid-depth
currents would be expected to exceed 46 cm/s (0.9 kn) 20% of the time.
Figure 3 shows that near-bottom currents would be expected to exceed 34
cm/s (0.7 kn) 20% of the time. As in the case of the observed currents,
model currents were coherent over the array spacing, and parallel to the
coast.
Historical winds blew from the southwest more than the winds did
during the observation period. Apparently southwest winds are common at
other times of the year. As a result, the model predicted more currents
toward the east than were observed during the winter and spring of 1987.
Currents for two hurricanes (Eloise, 1975 and Fredrick, 1979) which
had complete wind records and which passed near Pensacola were also
hindcast with the model. Both produced strong model currents toward the
west as the hurricanes approached, followed by strong currents toward the
east as they moved on north. The maximum current speed was 100 cm/s
(2.0 kn) during Fredrick.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The main conclusion from the observations is that nearshore currents
off Pensacola, Florida are controlled by the east-west component of the
wind. A wind with a strong component from the west will generate, after a
B-12
-------
Figure 6. Same as Figures 4 and 5 except for wind. Also directions are
"from" instead of "toward" (e.g., most winds came from the north).
B-13
-------
17 hour delay, a strong current toward the east. This current will move
parallel to the coast, and will be fairly uniform both horizontally and
vertically.
In similar fashion, a wind from the east will generate an equivalent
current toward the west. During the observation period, both of these
current directions occurred about equally as often.
The main conclusion from the modeling work, however, is that, over
long time periods, the above observations will be modified. The model
predicts that nearshore currents in the region will be stronger and more
often toward thewestthan were observed.
B-14
-------
CHAPTER 2
CURRENT ANALYSIS
CURRENTS OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
NAVAL OCEAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
NSTL STATION, MS 39529
B-15
-------
HOWE PORT CURRENT METER ANALYSIS
6 FEBRUARY 1967 - 7 APRIL 1967 DEPLOYMENT
OFF PENSACOLA BAT, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
Naval Ocean Research and Developnent Activity (NORDA)
1STL, Mississippi 39529
Prepared bjt
NEC Systeas Corporation
10629 Crestwood Drive
Nanassaa, Virginia 22110
Under Subcontract froa:
Planning Systeas Incorporated
115 Christian Lane
Slidell, Louisiana, 70456
9 June 1987
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
General
The acoustic current aeter (ACM) data were processed with frequently used
analysis techniques. The purpose of the analysis was to rapi
-------
and east-west relative to aagnetic north) and teaperature values as recorded by the
aeters were Inspected manually. The data were of high quality with the following
exceptions. The teaperature record for Array A at 17 a depth was not suitable for
analysis with bad values throughout the entire record. This current aeter also had
seven consecutive bad current values which slaply were replaced by the previous good
values since this small length of bad data would only affect two subsequently
determined 20 alnute vector averaged values. Table 1 suaaarlxes the data that were
analyzed.
The current aeasureaenta were next vector-averaged over 20 alnute tlae
Intervals centered on one-third hour tiaes (I.e. on the hour, on the hour plus 20
minutes, etc.). Vector averaging removes wave contamination which could be
important for the relatively shallow sensor depths. Temperature measurenents were
averaged over the same time periods. Yector-averaged current components were
rotated from the magnetic north reference used for the measurements to a true north
reference used for the analysis products. The following information was output to
magnetic tape at each 20 alnute tlae: data point 20 minute index (fro« 1 to the
number of 20 alnute values), original time series data point index corresponding to
the center of the 20 alnute time period, time in decimal days from the beginning of
the year, average value of east-weat component, standard deviation of this
component from the 20minute average, maximum absolute difference of this component
from the 20 minute average, average value of north-south component, a similar
standard deviation and maxlmm difference for this component, vector mean speed
computed from the averages of the two components, vector aean direction coaputed
frca the averages of the two components, average value of teaperature, and a aim liar
standard deviation and aaxlw absolute difference for teaperature. The 20 alnute
values of apead, dlreotlon, and teaperature vers used for subsequent analysis. The
B-17
-------
Table £-1 Data Information
Array Poaltlon Water Depth Meter Depth Starting Tlae Biding Tlae
(a) (a) (CST) (CST)
30.196 8
87.265 W
21
1220 6 Fab 87 0540 7 Apr 87
17
1220 6 Pab 87 0540 7 Apr 87
30.142 H
87.320 W
20
1220 6 Feb 87 0540 7 Apr 87
is
1220 6 Fab 87 0540 7 Apr 87
Starting and ending tines are for vector averaged values used in analysis.
B-18
-------
information on the aagnetio tape was preceeded bj a header reoord for each ourrent
Mt«r record and was provided to BORDA for archival. Table 2 provides the tape
format and an ezaiiple of the lnforaatlon on the aagnetlc tape.
Probability Distributions
Current speed and direction probability distributions and joint
probability distributions were calculated by counting occurrences within 10 ca/s
ranges, dividing by the total nuaber of aeasured values, and converting to
percentages. The distributions in the tables are provided in units of percent
multiplied by 100 (I.e. 100 » one percent). Occurrences on a boundary between two
ranges were counted In the higher of the two ranges. The joint distributions are
sunned over all speeds to provide direction distributions and over all directions to
provide speed distributions. The speed distributions are suaaed froa low to high
speed ranges to provide cumulative speed distributions (I.e. probabilities for
speeds to be less than the upper values of each speed range). The probability
distributions are accoapanled by the following suaaary statistics! vector aean
speed and direction calculated froa the north-south and east-west current
components, the scalar aean speed calculated by averaging all speeds regardless of
direction, the standard deviation of speeds about the scalar mean speed, the maximum
speed, and the minimum speed. The relative size of a vector mean speed compared to a
corresponding scalar mean speed Is a measure of directional variability. If a
vector aean speed is much smaller than a corresponding scalar aean speed, directions
of the individual aessureaents are highly variable. If a veotor aean speed is
almost as large as a scalar aean speed, Individual aessureaents tend to be uni-
directional over the aeasureaent time period.
B-19
-------
Table B-2
Magnetic Tape Format and Information
Daaalcy: 1600 bpi Typa: Oalahallad. 9 crack No. Flics: 4
Cod*: ASCII Racorda/Block: 32 Start of First Flic
Record Slta: 96 Block Slta: 3072 la balov. Not* folding
01967,Hoa« Port ftCM Bat* Array ft • 9»<31 ft>,KT"4 am °n ****• printar.
E-M,N-$
1
6
37.3139 -13.12
1.34
1.02
.24
.88
1.22
15.12
270.91
18.
.02
.02
*>
4
1 1
37.3270 -13.61
1.36
2.03
-1.02
1. 04
1.36
15.64
266.27
18.
3e
. 82
.03
'»
16
37.3417 -13.92
1.00
1.13
-.31
.69
1.22
13.92
268.74
18.
3i
.01
.01
4
21
37.3336 -14.72
. 77
1.30
-1.75
1.07
1.39
14.82
263.23
18.
37
.01
. 01
3
26
37.3693 -13.30
.31
.35
-3.13
1.42
1.00
15. 70
238.41
18.
37
.01
.01
e
31
37.3633 -17.36
.86
1.22
-3.84
1. 10 ,
1.50
17. 78
237.32
18.
33
.01
.01
?
36
37.3972 -19.06
.67
. 78
-4.99
.92
1.30
19. 71
253.34
18.
33
.02
.03
£
41
37.6111 -13.46
1.22
1.08
-6.77
. 74
1.01
16.88
246.33
18.
30
.01
.01
Q
46
37.6230 -13.89
.34
.69
-4.33
. 75
1.13
14.61
231.93
18.
32
.01
.02
Id
51
37.6389 -13.09
.31
.41
-3.40
.30
.38
16.03
250.29
18.
30
.00
.00
11
36
37.6320 -14.79
.32
.75
-3.63
1. 13
1.48
15.83
249.17
18.
30
.01
.01
12
61
37.6667 -14.34
.36
.93
-5.24
.02
.96
15. 46
250.17
18.
27
.01
.02
13
66
37.6806 - 14.33-
.66
1. 16
-5.30
.85
1.39
15.35
249.01
18.
2?
.01
.01
14
71
37.6943 -13.78
.33
. 78
-7.80
. 34
.81
13. 83
240.48
18.
23
.01
.01
13
76
37.7083 -14.29
.46
. 72
-7.09
1.04
1.24
15.95
243.61
18.
23
.01
.01
16
01
37.7222 -14.34
.33
.98
-6.28
.93
1.42
15.66
246.34
18.
24
.02
.03
1 7
86
37.7361 -13.33
. 39
.52
-7.21
.81
1.07
13. 16
241.39
18.
24
.00
.00
16
91
37.7500 -14.22
.39
¦ 78
-6.48
.7e
.90
15.63
245.30
18.
23
.02
.03
1?
96
37.7639 -12.89
.98
1.4S
-3.23
.69
1.13
13.91
247.92
18.
le
. 02
.03
20
101
17.777$ -10.fS
. e-S
1 . 10
-e. 94
. r 9
1.01
1 2. *0
237.45
IS.
i :•
.01
.02
11
106
37.7?17 -12.30
1 . 2?
1.33 -
11.24
1.60
2. SI
16.81
228.04
17.
w i>
. 06
. 10
% ».
* t
111
37.8036 -11.20
2. 13
3.42 -
12.34
• 53
. £ 1
16.66
222.23
17.
* i
.02
.03
B-20
-------
Tidal Analysis
Each current record was analyzed by least-squares techniques to provide
aaplltudes and phases of prlnary tidal constituents and to approximately remove
astronomical tidal currents from the current time series. The east-west and north-
south current velocity components were each represented by a time series of the form
where u Is a current component, dt Is the time Interval between samples (20 minutes),
(i-l)dt Is the time of the 1th sample relative to the starting time of the record, u0
is the mean value of the current component, N is the number of tidal constituents
considered in the analysis, cn is the amplitude of the nth constituent, cfa is the
radian frequency of the nth constituent, and <)n is the phase of the nth constituent.
The last equation can be written as
N
u(idt)
n=l
N
u(idt) = u +
o
+ b sin (or idt)
n n
n=l
where
B-21
-------
The cosine and tin* coefficients, ^ and bjj, were calculated so that the
given representation of current components by auaa of sinusoidal tidal constituents
provides the best least-squares fit to each measured current component. That is,
tidal constituents were determined to minimize the square of the differences
between the previous summation equations and each Matured ourrent coaponent.
This analysis was separately performed for each current aeter record using all
available data at 20 ainute Intervals*
Residual currents were calculated by vector subtraction of tidal currents
(calculated from the summation equations during the aeasureaent time period) from
the measured currents (referred to as total currents to avoid confusion). Residual
or nontldal currents include current contributions associated with large scale
circulation or prevailing currents, local wind-driven currents, internal waves,
thernohallne (i.e. density driven) currents, and currents related to nontldal sea
surface slopes. Nontldal currents may also include contributions at tidal
frequencies due to the presence of internal waves at tidal frequencies. Such tidal
frequency internal waves can be generated by interaction of aatronoalcal tides with
bottce topographic variations and the continental shelf.
There are mathematical requirements for mlniaua record lengths In order to
separate tidal constituents with nearly identical frequencies or periods. The
primary constituents that, were used are listed in the results by their common
abbreviations. Information about the constituents Is provided by Schureaan (1958)
and Hicks (1975)* Effects of not being able to resolve constituents with nearly
Identical frequencies Is often not a serious problea in using least-squares
analysis as a filtering method to separate tidal and nootllal currents because the
least-squares criterion forces good self-p red lotion agreesent whan only one of two
E-22
-------
similar frequencies Is used. Resolution of facta art aora aarloua for tidal
predictions at other times. Techniques to correct for effects of similar frequency
constituents are given by Shureman (1956).
For the tidal analysis results in this data report, the phases are
referenced to the start of the analysis (I.e. the tlae of the first 20 alnute data
point) for eaoh current meter record. The amplitudea are as provided by the
analysis and do not consider node factors which are described in the next paragraph.
In the field of tides, aaplitudes and phases are often given for use in the
following equation
where dg and K'n are tidal aaplitudes and phases. The parameter fQ is the node
factor for the nth constituent and ?n is the equilibrium arginent for the nth
constituent. The last equation generally is used for tidal predictions. Node
factors are specified for the nlddle of the year of the desired predictions and
equilibrium arguments are specified for the year, month, day, and hour of the start
of the predictions. Mode factors are functions of the year and the constituent of
concern, and are typically near unity plus or minus up to roughly 10$ for
constituents of most laportanoe. Equilibria* arguments range from 0° to 360° and
depend on the time and the constituent of concern, lode factors and equilibrium
argvnents are provided by Schureman (19J6)> Each tidal constituent has a known
N
n=l
B-23
-------
frequency* which can be written In degreea or radian* per hour, and the equilibria
argunanta adjust the phaae of the conatltuent of interest to the atart time of the
prediction*. By ape c If lying node factors and equilibria arguaenta for the atart
of an analyzed tiae aerlea and equating the previous suanatlon equatlona to the last
summation equation, calculated amplitudes and phaaes can be placed In the fora as
used by the last aquation. The phases, K'n, are sometimes called modified epochs.
Another equivalent approach to consider equilibrium argunenta Is to use the phases
as referenced to the start of the analysis and to have a tidal current prediction
program automatically adjust the phases to account for the* time interval between the
start of the analysis and the start of the predictions.
Relative importance of total, tidal, and residual currents can be estlaated
from the percent of the total variance that is nontidal. This la 100 multiplied by
the variance of the residual record divided by the variance of the total record.
For each current component, these results are shown with the constituents. These
percentages also represent the ratio of the non tidal current kinetic energy to the
total current kinetic energy. If a record is totally tidal, the percentage Is 0*
and, if a record is totally non tidal, the percentage Is ^00%. The Hone Port data
typically are greater than 95$ nontldal.
Spectral Analysis
Spectra were calculated by standard faet Fourier transform techniques
(e.g. Otnes and Enochscn, 1978). Fourier ooefflclenta of the two velocity
ooapooenta (north-south and east-west) were determined for sections of eaoh record
containing 4096 data points at the 20 alnute sampling interval. Short partial
B-24
-------
section* (205 data points) at the end* of eaeh record vera not ueed. Ho window waa
applied to the tiae aeries. Froa the Fourier coefficient*, kinetic spectra and
rotary spectra paraaetera were coaputed using techniques described by Gone11a
(1972) and Hooers (1973)* There are alnor aatheaatical errors in the latter paper
and these were corrected. Soae of theae errors were noted by Middle ton (1962).
During calculations, band averaging over Fourier frequencies was perforaed.
The utilized equations for rotary spectral analysis of the data are
summarized here. In the literature, there have been soae differences in the Banner
in which band averages of various paraaeters have been performed. The aaplltudea
of the anti-clockwise, A, and clockwise, C, rotating velocity ooaponenta are given
by
where a^ and b-j are the cosine and sine Fourier coefficients of the east-west
velocity component and ^ b2 are sijni^ar paraaeters for the north-south velocity
component. Corresponding phases are given by
tan $ = (aj-bjJ/faj+bp
tan e'= (-bj-ajJ/Uj-l^)
B-25
-------
Fran these, the following paraaeters were obtained:
Clockwise Energy Spectrum:
Er . C?.
Anti-Clockwise Energy Spectrua: - A
Difference Spectrua:
®D " EC " eA
Total Kinetic Energy Spectrua: E E^ + Eg
Rotary Coefficient:
RC - *C * EA
*c ~ ea
Rotary Ellipse Orientation:
* = I tan"1 ^sini£-f
2 I ACcos (#-<
Rotary Ellipse Stability:
- „ ACslndt'-gr * ~ ACcosltf-d)
where the overbars indicate averaging individual Fourier coaponents over each band.
Interpretations of the spectral definitions are relatively dear. Values
of all spectra are those for energy density, that is (ca/s)^/oph. The rotary
B-26
-------
coefficient varies between zero and one with the letter value occur lng for perfectly
circular botioo. The ellipse orientation is the dlreotloc. along vhloh the current
velocities are a aaxlaua. The ellipse stability varies between aero end one and is
a aeasure of the siallarlty of ellipses at the individual Fourier frequecnies within
each band. It approaches unity if there is little variation over a given band. The
tables of rotary spectra parameters also provide the degrees of freedom for each
frequency band. The degrees of freedom are twice the number of Fourier frequenoles
in each band aultlplled by the number of separate sections used to analyze each
record. The 90£ percent confidence intervals for kinetic energy spectra (total
spectrum in the tables) are given by
vEt < et < vEt
^v;0.05 *vr0.95
where v is degrees of freedoa, Ej is the total kinetic energy density for the band,
E't is true total kinetic energy density, and^ values are obtained from ohl-aquare
distributions.
B-27
-------
HOME PORT CURRENT METER AKALTSIS
13 MARCH 1987 - 18 JUNE 1987 DEPLOYMENT
OFF PENSACOLA BAY, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity (NORDA)
NSTL, Mississippi 39529
Prepared byi
NEC Systems Corporation
10629 Crestwood Drive
Manassas, Virginia 22110
Under Subcontract from:
Planning Systems Incorporated
115 Christian Lane
Slide11, Louisiana, 70458
17 July 1987
SUMMARY
This data report provides data analysis products which document currents
off Pensaoola, Florida, between 13 March and 18 June 1987* The data were oollected
during the seoond deployment of acoustlo current meters In the area. A previous
data report (Reference 1) describes currents during the first deployment.
Of the three ourrent meter reoords that were provided, there were two data
quality problems. The temperature record for Array C at 16 m depth was not suitable
for analysis with bad values throughout the entire record. This is of little
importance because the temperatures measured by the other meters adequately
describe temperatures in the area* The current reoord for Array C at 16 ¦ depth
contained several Incorrect sero values near the end of the record starting at 0240
on 8 May. These data were exoluded from further processing. Table 1 suaaarises
the data that were prooeaaed.
B-28
-------
Table B-3 Hone Port Deployment 2 Data Information
Array Poaltlon Water Depth Meter Depth Starting Time Ending Time
(a) (a) (CST) (CST)
C 30.200 N 21 9 0840 13 Mar 67 1140 14 Jun 87
87.233 W
16 0640 13 Mar 87 0220 8 Nay 87
(currenta only)
30.142 H 24 11 0920 13 Mar 87 1140 18 Jun 67
87.250 V
Starting and ending times are for vector-averaged values used in analysis.
B-29
-------
The data ware prooessed with frequently uaed analysis techniques which are
described In Reference 1. The only minor difference was that spectra were
calculated using blocks of 2046 data values (after veotor-averaglng to 20 minute
values). The following numbers of data values were used for each reoordi 6144
values (3 blooks) for Array C at 9 » depth) 4096 values (2 blocks) for Array C at 16 a
depth} and 6144 values (3 blooks) for Array D at 11 ¦ dapth. Since 4014 veotor-
averaged 20 alnute values were available for Array C at 16 a depth, tero values were
added to obtain the 4096 values required by the fast Fourier transform part of the
spectral analysis*
The 20 alnute values of speed, direction, and teaperature were used for all
analysis. These values also are provided on magnetlo tape In the same format as the
magnetic tape for the first deployment.
B-30
-------
REFERENCES
Gone11a, A., A rotary-component method for analysing meteorological and
ocaanographic vector tine aeriea, Deep-Sea Reg., 19, 833*646, 1972.
Hicks, S., Tide and Currant Glossary, National Ocean Survey, Rational Oceanic and
Ataoapherlo Administration, 1975*
Middle ton, J.H., Outer rotary croaa spectra, coherences, and phases (letter to
ed.), Deep-Sea Res., 29, 1267-1269, 1982.
Hooers, C.N.K., A technique for the cross-spectrum analysis of pairs of complez-
valued time aeries, with emphasis on properties of polarized components and
rotational Invariants, Deep-Sea Res., 20, 1129-1141, 1973*
Otnes, R.K., and L. Enochson, Applied Time Series Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New
York, 1978.
Schureman, P., Manual of Harmonic Analysis and Prediction of Tides, U.S. Coast and
Geodetic Survey, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958, reprinted 1971.
B-31
-------
CHAPTER 3
MODEL ANALYSIS
CURRENTS OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
NAVAL OCEAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
NSTL STATION, MS 39529
B-32
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION
2. AVAILABLE DATA
3. CALIBRATION
4. HURRICANE CURRENTS
5. CLIMATOLOGICAL CURRENTS
6. CONCLUSIONS .
7. REFERENCES
APPENDIX A -- CLIMATOLOGICAL STEADY-STATE CURRENT
MODEL RESULTS (Available under separate
cover.)
B-33
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
LIST OF FIGURES
Title
Site map showing location of study points A and B
Currents measured on Alabama shelf in the summer
of 1976 by Schroeder (1976)
Example of near-coastal currents in unstratified water.
(Note: There are basically two flow layers.)
Example of near-coastal currents in stratified water.
(Note: There are basically three flow layers.)
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site 8
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at Site 8.
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at Site B
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B
Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at Site B
B-34
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
(continued)
Figure
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Title
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at Site A
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B
Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at Site B
Storm tracks for Hurricanes Eloise (1975) and Frederic
(1979)
Hindcast currents at 9-meter level for Site B in
Hurricane Eloise
Hindcast currents at 9-meter level for Site B in
Hurricane Frederic
Example of calculated currents for Hurricane Eloise
Wind rose for the winds at Pensacola (Fla.) airport
Speed categories are 8 knots and reference circles
are 25%. Direction categories are in terms of
directions from which winds are coming
Current rose for velocities at top grid point for
Site A (approximately 2.0 meters below the water
surface). Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference
circles are 20%. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which currents are coming
Current rose for velocities at bottom grid point for
Site A (approximately 2.0 meters above the bottom).
Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference circles
are 20%. For consistency in comparison to the wind
roses, direction categories are referenced in terms
of directions from which currents are coming
B-35
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
(concluded)
Figure
28
29
30
31
32
33
Title
Current rose for velocities at top grid point for
Site B (approximately 1.9 meters below the water
surface). Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference
circles are 20t. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in terms
of directions from which currents are coming
Current rose for velocities at bottom grid point for
Site B (approximately 1.9 meters above the bottom).
Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference circles
are 201. For consistency in comparison to the wind
roses, direction categories are referenced in terms
of directions from which currents are coming
Cumulative distribution of current velocities at top
grid point for Site A
Cumulative distribution of current velocities at bottom
grid point for Site A
Cumulative distribution of current velocities at top
grid point for Site B
Cumulative distribution of current velocities at bottom
grid point for Site B
B*36
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title
B-4 Annotated example of currents at Site B from
Hurricane Eloise
B-5 Probabil ity matrix for currents at top grid point
for Site A.
B-6 Probability matrix for currents at bottom grid point
for Site A
B-7 Probability matrix for currents at top grid point
for Site B
B-8 Probability matrix for currents at bottom grid point
for Site B
B-37
-------
ABSTRACT
Using a multi-layered current model, currents at two proposed
dredged material disposal sites in the vicinity of Pensacola, Florida,
were investigated. The first step of this procedure involved calibra^
tion of the model with measurements taken at two levels at two separate
sites. Comparisons between modeled and measured data indicate that the
model predictions correspond quite well to the measurements at both
levels and both sites. These currents, due to the proximity of the
coastline, are directed primarily in the alongshore direction.
In the second part of this study, winds from two historical
hurricanes (Eloise and Frederic) were used to drive the current model.
Results indicate that, during such events, currents of about 1 m/sec can
be expected in the vicinity of the proposed dredged disposal sites.
These currents will be directed primarily in the along-coast direction.
In the final phase of this study, steady-state currents were
calculated for various wind speeds and directions. CIimatological wind
statistics were obtained for nearby Pensacola airport. These were
converted to overwater winds via the method of Resio and Vincent (1977).
These probabilities of wind speeds and directions were converted to
probabilities of current speeds and directions using the results of the
steady-state model runs. Results show that dominant current directions
are along the coast with the net current toward the east. The onshore-
offshore transport is low-velocity and about balanced in terms of their
percentage occurrences. Thus, any transports associated with these
currents should be directed primarily along the coast rather than toward
or away from the shore.
B-38
-------
PREDICTED CLIMATOLOGY OF CURRENTS AT TO SITES
OFF PENSACOLA BAY, FLORIDA
1. INTRODUCTION
During the last ten years the ability to predict accurate currents
has improved markedly as a better understanding of turbulence closure
and related mixing effects has been coupled into multi-layer numerical
models. Unfortunately, many of these models require large amounts of
computer time and related expenses, particularly for the case of fine-
scale applications in near-coastal locations. To overcome this problem,
OCTI has developed and employed in several studies a class of models
which incorporates a high-order turbulence closure scheme (in the
vertical dimension) into a multi-1ayered model. Since the grid spacing
in the horizontal is typically much larger than the spacing in the
vertical, a split timing can be used to optimize computer run time.
Careful studies of currents in water depths less than 30 meters, or
so, have demonstrated that the advective terms in such shallow coastal
areas tend to be much smaller than the local balance terms. Thus, the
three-component equations of motion can be approximated as
where z is the vertical space coordinate (positive upward), t is the
time coordinate, f is the coriolis parameter, U and V are the mean
velocities in the x and y directions, respectively, g is gravity, P is
the density of water, "JJS and vw are the Reynolds stresses, and v is the
(la)
fU + g| (-vw + Vjy)
B-39
-------
molecular kinematic viscosity. If we assume that the vertical pressure
distribution is hydrostatic and that mean vertical motions are much
smaller than the horizontal motions, we can reduce the solution in our
vertical dimension to equations for U and V only,
l2a) 51 = -9 57 ~ " + ~ v
(2b) $ - -g |n . fl) ~ (-W ~ V §|)
The existence of the Reynolds stresses, which result from temporal
averaging of the exact equations of motion, results in what is
classically called the closure problem of turbulence. In order to
reduce our system so that there are the same number of equations as
unknowns, it is necessary to parameterize the Reynolds stress terms in
equations 2a and 2b. The usual practice for parameterizing turbulent
stresses is to invoke the Boussinesq eddy viscosity/diffusivity closure
hypothesis, in which the turbulent fluxes of mean flow momentum are
approximated by the product of the eddy viscosity/diffusivity coeffi-
cient and the vertical mean flow strain rate. These closure expressions
are written as follows:
„ . — 3U
(3a) -uw = vt gy
and
(3b) -vw ¦ vt 1^
in which is the turbulent eddy viscosity/diffusivity coefficient.
The problem with this type of closure methodology is that one
trades one unknown quantity, the turbulent Reynolds stress, for another
unknown quantity, the turbulent eddy viscosity/diffusivity coefficient.
B-40
-------
If the eddy viscosity/diffusivity coefficient is not correctly
specified, then the turbulent stresses are, in fact, misrepresented.
To avoid this problem, a state-of-the-art modeling methodology for
calculating the vertical distribution of the eddy viscosity/diffusivity
coefficient is employed, namely, the two-equation (k-e) turbulence
closure approach.
The two-equation (k-e) turbulence closure model as presented by
Launder and Spalding (1974) is based on the following fundamental
principles. Unlike the kinematic molecular viscosity, v, the kinematic
turbulent eddy viscosity, is flow dependent and can vary in both
space and time. An approximation for the distribution of the turbulent
eddy viscosity is obtained by assuming that it is proportional to the
product of the characteristic velocity and length scales of turbulence,
namely:
(4) \>t « k1^-
in which k is the turbulence energy per unit mass defined
as J$(uu + vv + ww) or one half the sum of the normal Reynolds stress
components, and i is the macroscale of turbulence (a measure of the size
of the energy containing eddies). An inviscid estimate of the energy
dissipation rate per unit mass, e, is obtained when one assumes that the
amount of energy dissipated at the small scales of turbulence equals the
rate of supply at the large scales.
Again utilizing the characteristic velocity and length scales of
turbulence, dimensional considerations require that (Tennekes and
Lumley, 1972)
B-41
-------
Substitution of equation 4 into equation 5 yields a functional
relationship for the turbulent eddy viscosity in terras of the kinetic
energy of turbulence, k, and its rate of dissipation, e, specifically:
k2
(6) vt = C -
t v £
where is an empirical coefficient.
Transport equations required for the computation of the turbulence
energy per unit mass, k, and its rate of dissipation, e. may be derived
in an exact form from the Navier-Stokes equation. Unfortunately, con-
struction of the transport equations results in an additional closure
problem. The details of the"derivation af the transport equation for k
and e are given by Chapman (1982, 1983), in which the following set of
model equations are presented
(7a) US = _L 3Ji\ + v + tQL) 1 . G
1 ' 3t 3z * ak 3z t*- 3z' ^3z' J £
and
(7b) If ¦ af If' * Clvt k " C2 f2
where is the effective viscosity (v^ + v); and a£, Prandtl/
Schmidt numbers; and and C^, empirical constants. Estimates for the
empirical constants found in equations 7a and 7b were originally
obtained by applying the model equations to simple turbulent flows for
which data from careful experiments were available. OCTI has tested
B-42
-------
its k-e model against measured data in several studies ranging from
ice floes in the 8eaufort Sea to hurricane currents in the Gulf of
Mexico and found that the originally derived coefficients appear to work
well. Consequently, no adjustments have been made in the present model
to the value of the empirical coefficients listed below:
C = 0.09,
v
Cj = 1.44,
C2 = 1.99,
a^ = 1.00, and
a = 1.30.
e
Solution of the transport equations for the turbulence kinetic
energy, k, and its rate of dissipation, e, along with the transport
equations for mean momentum allows one to dynamically specify the
temporal and spatial distribution of the turbulent eddy viscosity,
In conjunction with the definition of the turbulent Reynolds stresses
(equations 3a and 3b), the equations and constants outlined above
constitute the complete (k-e) closure methodology.
The boundary condition at the air-water interface is obtained in
the finite difference scheme by simply setting
.(t)
(8a) (-uw + v 1^-) = -
and
x
32 z=0 pw
— 3 V Iv't'
(8b) (-W ~ v |i) ¦
" 2-0 PW
where t and t are the
* Jr
directions, respectively.
components of wind stress in the x and y
B-43
-------
The ocean bottom boundary condition is obtained using the "wall
function method" (Launder and Spalding, 1974) which is based on an
extrapolation of the log velocity profile.
Following along the lines of Blumberg and Mellor (1979), in the
mode splitting version of OCTI's multi-layered model, the solution to
the external driving mode is obtained by integrating the internal mode
equations over depth. In this context, the continuity equation becomes
(9) 4-- 0
where n is the water surface elevation, u and v are the depth-integrated
velocities for the x and y directions, respectively, and D is the total
water depth. Under the assumption of neglegible vertical accelerations
and neutrally-stable, incompressible water, we can represent the
momentum equations as
(10.) -If • + 9 -If ~ 5 -si- ~ »„»2S ~ Fx " 0
and
(10b) 4r * fU * 9 -3F * " "TT * "h'2* + Fy * 0
where is a horizontal eddy viscosity coefficient and Fx and Fy are
the external forcing mechanisms (wind stresses).
B-44
-------
2. AVAILABLE DATA
NORDA recently completed a two-month current measurement program,
with current arrays located as shown in Figure 1. The same points A and
B are the points of interest in the present study. Additional
information on currents in this general area has been taken by Schroeder
(1976) and by Murray (1975). Figure 2 shows a time series of currents
from the summer of 1976 at a site located in about 25 meters of water on
the Alabama shelf. As can be seen there, the general tidal currents in
this region are expected to be on the order of 10 cm/sec or so.
B-45
-------
Figure 1. Site map showing location of study points A and B.
-------
160 166 f72 V* ie*
190 1% 202 20C 2U
220 22G 23-'
-20
File :
Meter :
Latitude :
Longitude
N00676
0
30 I 0 N
86 5 0 S
196 20» 20C
Time (Julian Days)
Array :
Depth :
Start :
End :
NODC
20
2 JUN 1976
Figure 2. Currents measured on Alabama shelf in the summer of
1976 by Schroeder (1976).
B-47
-------
3. CALIBRATION
In order to calibrate OCTI's current model to the specific sites of
interest, we selected 2 three-day time increments from the overall set
of measurements from MEC. It is possible that stratification may play a
significant role in determining the precise nature of the onshore-
offshore transport process. As discussed by Murray (1975), the onshore-
offshore transport under neutral stratification forms a two-layer system
(Figure 3). Under stable stratification, the transport pattern shifts
into a characteristic three-layer regime (Figure 4). Without an inten-
sive multi-level measurement program and a coincident set of measure-
ments of water temperatures, it would be difficult to calibrate a model
which includes stratification effects. Consequently, for this study we
used the assumption of neutral stratification for all calibration runs
and final production runs.
It should also be noted that stability effects will tend to
diminish as the wind-driven circulation gets stronger, due to increased
mixing throughout the water column. Hence, although the effects of sta-
bility may be very important under low wind conditions, the assumption
of neutral stability should be quite acceptable for modeling moderate to
high wind conditions (say winds greater than 20 knots or so). Since
moderate to high wind events are likely to control the overall sediment
transport at the bottom, this assumption should also be adequate for
climatological modeling.
In OCTI's current model, the surface drag at the air-sea interface
is typically not used as a tuning parameter. Instead, the Large and
Pond (1980) form for a velocity-dependent drag coefficient is imposed.
B-48
-------
Direction, Degree*
iffshore -8 ~4~2 0 2 4 6 onshore
Direction
Speed
¦
O 2
I I i
® 8 10 12 14 16 is 20 a 10'1
Speed, m/eec
Figure 3. Example of near-coastal currents in unstratified water.
(Note: There are basically two flow layers.)
B-49
-------
Olfaction, degree*
Figure 4. Example of near-coastal currents in stratified water.
(Note: There are basically three flow layers.)
B-50
-------
Their form for the drag coefficient was obtained from an analysis of an
extensive field data set and 1s approximated by
CD - 1.2 x 10"3 W < 11 m/sec
CQ = (.49 ~ .065 W) x 10"3 W > 11 m/sec
where Cp is the (air-sea) coefficient of drag and W is the wind speed in
meters per second at a 10-meter reference height. This leaves two per-
tinent problems for calibration, the specification of a reasonable wind
field over the study area and the selection of an appropriate bottom
roughness parameter. For calibration purposes it would have been best
to have had good wind measurements at the sites of the current
measurements. However, since these were not available, winds for the
study area were obtained by kinematic analysis with nearshore wind
conditions estimated via the methodology described by Resio and Vincent
(1977).
The local wind data were obtained from the National Climatic Data
Center (NCOC) in Ashville, North Carolina. The most comprehensive data
set was available for the years 1948 through the present at the
Pensacola airport. The weather maps for the kinematic analyses for the
period of current measurements had to be special-ordered from the
National Weather Service office In Washington, D.C., because they were
not yet available at NCDC. After three sensitivity tests of the bottom
roughness parameter, a value of 1 on was found to yield reasonable
results and was used in all final calibration and production runs.
As pointed out in section 1, a quadratic stress law is assumed to
govern the boundary at the bottom of the water column. If It is
B-51
-------
desirable to convert the roughness length given here into a coefficient
of drag, the following relationship can be used
(11) Cj =
M(-f-)
0
where Cg is the coefficient of drag at the bottom, K is Von Karmen's
constant, z is the level at which the current is specified, and z0 is
the roughness height (1 mm in this case).
Figures 5-20 show a comparison between OCTI's model predictions
(with superimposed tidal currents added) and the measured currents for
g and 17 meters at Site A and 9 and 16 meters at Site B. For all cali-
bration runs and production runs, the depth at Site A was set at
22 meters, and the depth at Site B was set at 21 meters. This is
slightly larger than the depth at these sites reported by MEC; however,
they fit better with the overall bathymetric data available to us.
Velocities were calculated at 10 levels throughout the water column; and
the horizontal grid mesh size was 2 n.mi. in the primary area of
interest. The time periods covered are March 22-25 and 28-31, 1987. As
can be seen in these figures the overall current magnitudes and direc-
tions seem to agree reasonably well, particular in light of the lack of
accurate wind measurements at the site. All directions are referenced
as vectors in a standard mathematical coordinate system. Thus, 0°
represents a current heading east, 90° represents a current heading
north, 180° represents a current heading west, and 270° represents a
current heading south. In order to ensure that no spin-up effects were
included in these comparisons, only the last 3 days of each model run
are shown.
B-52
-------
36(3
315
27U -
22S -
CORTES I AN 1813 —
DIRECTION
135 -
Current Directions at Pensacale, Florida
87133220(3 - 8713326(3(3
Station fl — 9 meters
—MEASURED
PREDICTED
7
\>
.AJ^~
3X22
,
3/23 3/24
1987
3/25
Figure 5. Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A.
B-53
-------
3&u
315
27ia
T
225 -|
CARTESIAN 18U
DIRECTION
135
98-
45-
U
Current Oiroctions at Ponsacolo, Florida
07U322UU - 87(4326013
Station ft — 17 aaters
— MEASURED
- — PREDICTED
3/22
-V"
3X23 3/24
1987
3/25
Figure 6. Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at Site A.
B-54
-------
Current Directions at Pensacolo, Florida
BTU3220B - 8703260(4
Station B — 9 maters
MEASURED
PREDICTED
36U
315 -
w
% 1
\\
27a -
I
1 X
\V
225-
t \
\\
* ^ /y a,«aAv
CARTESIAH IBM _
'Orw-C*—1
DIRECTION
V
135 -
9(0-
45-
\
1
U -
\
3/22
1 1 1
3/23 3/24 3/25
1987
Figure 7. Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B.
B-55
-------
Curren-t Directions at Pansacolo, Florida
0713322190 - 8719326(98
Station B — 16 meters
MEASURED
PRtDICTtD
1987
Figure 8. Comparison of measured and predicted current directions
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at Site B.
B-56
-------
Current Speeds in c«/s at Pensacola, Florida
(37(432200 - 870326HU
Station ft — 9 meters
—- MEASURED
PREDICTED
1987
Figure 9. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds for
March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A.
B-57
-------
314
25 -
2U -
SPEED 15 -
(cn/s)
1U
Currant Speeds in cm/a a*t Pensacole, Florida
87IS322UU - 878326Ut3
Station fl — 17 ¦o'ters
MEASURED
• — PREDICTED
Figure 10. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at
Site A.
B-58
-------
Current Speeds in. cm/s at Pensacola, Florida
87B322UU - 87ia326UU
Station B — 9 meters
' MEASURED
- - predicted
35
3(4
25
2(3 -
SPEED
(cm/s)
v.
V
3/22
3/23
3/24
3/25
1987
Figure 11. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B.
B-59
-------
Currant Speeds in cm/a at Pensacola, Florida
8TB32ZBB - 8713326(913
Station B — 16 meters
MEASURER
PREDICTED
1987
Figure 12. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 22-25, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at
Site B.
B-60
-------
Current Directions at Peniacolo, Florid®
B7U3aaa» - svtMiaiuia
Station ft — 9 aeters
MEASURED
PREDICTED
2*713 -
CARTES ION 18a -
DIRECTION
135
913-
IS-
(3.
Vf\.
\
M
1 I"'
K
\
'UiLa£
3/28
3/29 3/3U
1987
3/31
Figure 13. Comparison of measured and predicted current direc-
tions for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at
Site A.
B-61
-------
36a
CARTESIAN 18U -
DIRECTION
13S-I
Current Directions at Pensacole, Florida
870328(M - 87134131 laid
Station ft — 17 Mters
— MEASURED
PHE
3/3B
' ¦ S\
-V
3/29 a/aa
1987
s4l a I*. A
3/31
Figure 14. Comparison of measured and predicted current direc-
tions for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 17 meters at
Site A.
B-62
-------
Current Directions at Pensecola, Florida
Q7U3ZQUU - Qviaiiaiiaia
Station 8 -- 9 motors
MEASURED
PRtUlCTtD
3&ia
315 H
27(3 -
S2S -
CARTESIAN IBM -
DIRECTION
135
9(3 -
45-
U
s- A
V \
1/
X
3X28
3X29 3X3M
1307
3/31
Figure 15. Comparison of measured and predicted current direc-
tions for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at
Site B.
B-63
-------
36B
DIRECTION
Curron-t Olractioni a"t Poniacala, F 1 or- i
-------
Current Speeds in cm/s o-t Ponsacolo, Florida
8713328013 - 87(34131(30
Slat i on R — 9 meters
I I I
3/28 3/29 3/3(3 3/31
1387
Figure 17. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site A.
B-65
-------
3a
25 -
2(3
SPEED is -
(cm/s)
ita -
s -
Currant Spoeds in cm/s at Psnsacola, Florida
Q7ia32Si3ia - 87
-------
Current Speeds in co/s at Psnsocolo, Florida
87(432800 - 87U<4U1UU
Station Q — 9 meters
MEASURED
PREDICT tD
-i
SPEED
(cm/s)
35
3U
25
2B
1U -
rvA
i\
AkN
r' /
t t
!/
A!;
V I
/
Dl
u-f
V
3/28
I
3/29 3/3(3
1987
3/31
Figure 19. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 9 meters at Site B,
B-67
-------
Current Speeds in ca/i at Pensecola, Florida
87ia328U<3 - B704U1UU
Station B — 16 meters
MEASURED
PREDICTED
1987
Figure 20. Comparison of measured and predicted current speeds
for March 28-31, 1987, in depth of 16 meters at
Site B.
B-68
-------
As expected in the comparisons, the current model can be tuned (via
the bottom roughness parameter) to match the magnitude of the peaks
quite well. Some problems with phasing of the predicted currents are
evident but these should not be important in climatological
applications. One point of interest in the comparisons is the rela-
tively good agreement in current directions. This is due to the
proximity of the shoreline to Sites A and B and suggests that the
steady-state approximation used in the climatological hindcasts should
provide a good overall representation of the actual currents.
B--69
-------
4. HURRICANE CURRENTS
In order to ascertain the possible effects of hurricanes on dredged
materials placed at the study sites, wind fields from two historical
hurricanes, Eloise and Frederic, were used to drive OCTI's current
model. The tracks of these storms are shown in Figure 21. Hindcast
currents at a nine-meter (from the top) level are shown in Figure 22 for
Hurricane Eloise and Figure 23 for Hurricane Frederic. Currents at
10 levels and bottom stress components are provided on magnetic tape in
the following format:
Header:
Currents:
(cm/sec)
date-time,
direction, velocity
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
depth of
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
level,
level,
level,
level,
level,
level,
level,
level,
1evel,
level,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
x-component,
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
y-component
Friction
Veloci ty:
x-component, y-component
Directions are given in the mathematical, cartesian system. The
x-direction is positive eastward and the y-direction is positive
northward. Table 1 shows an annotated example of currents at Site B
from Hurricane Eloise. Figure 24 shows a plot of the current direction
and speed at this time.
B-70
-------
(1979).
-------
360
315
270
225
CRRTESIRN 180
DIRECTION 135
90
45
.0
. 4 -
. 3 -
SPEED
C m/s) , 2 _
. 1 -
.0
¦J< »f; »>• f' ^ .fr
:|; t\i * ;[; ;|r ;|r * * * > J
9/22
9/24
Figure 22. Hindcast currents at 9-meter level for Site B in
Hurricane Eloise.
B-72
-------
+—4—+i—4"—4—H<—+<—+——+—*—4—+—
¦r"Trr»fKiii in- i i i
SPEED
( m/s)
9/12
9/13
1979
Figure 23. Hindcast currents at 9-meter level for Site B in
Hurricane Frederic.
B-73
-------
Table B-4
ANNOTATED EXAMPLE OF CURRENTS AT SITE B
FROM HURRICANE ELOISE
header line
I
DATE-TIME
= 79091303
W-SPEED
(KTS) = 48
.4 W-DIR
1.9080
170.4995
.5537
-.5461
.0914
3.8160
173.3940
.5398
-.5363
.0621
5.7240
175.9746
.5279
-.5266
.0371
7.6320
178.2775
.5171
-.5169
. 0155
9.5400
180.3303
.5071
-.5070
-.0029
11.4480
182.1561
.4971
-.4967
-.0187
13.3560
18'..7734
.4867
-.4856
-.0320
15.2640
185.1976
.4751
-.4731
-.0430
17.1720
186.4424
.4609
-.4580
-.0517
19.0800
187.5352
.4399
-.4361
-.0577
187.5352
.0758
-.0758
-.0100
depths
(neters)
cartesian
directions
(degrees)
current
speed
(n/sec)
111.9
x-conponent
of current
(n/sec)
y-conponent
of current
(n/sec)
B-74
-------
-18(3 (9 18(3
UELOCITV cm/s
CURRENT UELOCITV
CURRENT DIRECTION
Figure 24. Example of calculated currents for Hurricane Eloi
B-75
-------
5. CLIMATOLOGICAL CURRENTS
As the final phase of this study, OCT I's multi-layer current model
was exercised over a range of wind conditions typical of the study area.
For each case, the model was run from initial zero-current conditions to
a steady-state condition (typically 3 hours to 11 hours of simulated
time). No tidal effects were added; however, a reasonable approximation
to the combined tide/wind-driven current regime should be obtainable by
linear superposition. Thus, a convolution method can be used to gen-
erate the final combined current probabilities. If additional detail on
currents is needed relative to some threshold value, it appears that a
linear interpolation method should suffice to estimate currents between
any two velocities simulated.
The wind conditions simulated were from 0° through 315° azimuth in
45° increments (referenced here in standard meteorological terms of
winds out of a direction relative to north). Velocities simulated
ranged from 8 knots through 32 knots in 8-knot increments. Information
on all results for each case is provided in Appendix A and on magnetic
tape in the same format as described in Section 4.
Figure 25 shows a wind rose for the winds at Pensacola airport. As
seen there, winds at this site come from the southwest over 252 of the
time. However, winds out of the north and northeast also constitute a
significant portion of the winds in excess of 16 knots. As shown by
Reslo and Vincent (1977), the wind speeds offshore should be consider-
ably higher than those at this airport station (from as much as 2001 at
the lowest wind category to about 25X at the highest category shown).
On the other hand, the distribution of wind directions offshore should
not be much altered from those measured at this site.
B-76
-------
Figure 25. Wind rose for the winds at Pensacola (Fla.) airport.
Speed categories are 8 knots and reference circles
are 25%. Direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which winds are coining.
B-77
-------
Figures 26-29 show calculated current roses for the top and bottom
levels in the current model at Sites A and B. Tables 2-5 show the
probability matrices for these currents, and Figures 30-33 show the
cumulative distribution of current velocities. As can be seen in these
figures and tables, currents are primarily directed along the shore with
secondary maxima in the onshore offshore direction. The physical reason
for this is that, for winds within about 60 to 70X of parallel to the
coast, the current system develops into one with dominant alongshore
directions, while, for wind directions forming angles greater than */J%
of parallel to the coast, the current system sets up a slow onshore-
offshore circulation. Murray (1975) provides an excellent description
of the balance of forces (wind stress, coriolis acceleration, bottom
stress and surface slope) primarily responsible for this behavior.
Since the surface slope term always tends to oppose the wind stress term
for onshore-offshore winds, the currents in this direction always tend
to be somewhat small under steady-state conditions. This still can be
responsible for significant upwelling of cold water for offshore winds
but does not produce any high velocities directed onshore near the
bottom, such as would be required to transport substantial quantities of
bottom material to the shore.
As expected from the distribution of wind directions and speeds,
there is a predominance of currents out of the west (toward the east)
for both sites A and B. Since sites A and B are located in about the
same depth ano similar distances from the shorelines, the currents at
the top and bottom levels at these sites do not differ much from each
other. Most of the currents at the bottom levels are less than
0.4 m/sec with only a small percentage in the 0.4 to 0.6 m/sec category.
B-78
-------
Figure 26. Current rose for velocities at top grid point for
Site A (approximately 2.0 meters below the water
surface). Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference
circles are 201. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which currents are coming.
B-79
-------
Figure 27. Current rose for velocities at bottom grid point for
Site A (approximately 2.0 meters above the bottom).
Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference circles
are 20%. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which currents are coming.
B-80
-------
Figure 28. Current rose for velocities at top grid point for
Site 6 (approximately 1.9 meters below the water
surface). Speed classes are 0.2 m/sec and reference
circles are 20%. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which currents are coming.
B-81
-------
/
Figure 29. Current rose for velocities at bottom grid point for
Site B (approximately 1.9 meters above the bottom).
Speed classes are 0.2 ra/sec and reference circles
are 20*. For consistency in comparison to the
wind roses, direction categories are referenced in
terms of directions from which currents are coming.
B-82
-------
Table B-5
PROBABILITY MATRIX FOR CURRENTS AT TOP
GRID POINT FOR SITE A
0° 45°
4.75
2.13
21.51
0.00
3.17
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90° 135°
10.74 1.56
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
180° 225°
10.39 2.33
33.14 0.00
2.00 0.00
0.02 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
270° 315®
7.11
1. 06
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0 . 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-83
-------
Table B-6
PROBABILITY MATRIX FOR CURRENTS AT BOTTOM
GRID POINT FOR SITE A
0°
14.43
10.69
1.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
45°
3.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
O.GJ
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
90°
9.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
135°
3.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
180°
29.08
16.93
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
225°
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
270°
10.11
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
315°
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B-84
-------
Table B-7
PROBABILITY MATRIX FOR CURRENTS AT TOP
GRID POINT FOR SITE B
0° 45°
4 .68
2.10
22.30
0.00
2.32
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90° 135°
10.58 1.22
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
180° 225°
10.56 0.94
33.63 0.00
1.57 0.00
0.02 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
270° 31:'-
9.13
0.84
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
B-85
-------
Table B-8
PROBABILITY MATRIX FOR CURRENTS AT BOTTOM
GRID POINT FOR SITE B
0° 45°
17.40 2.67
12.90 0.00
0.33 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
90° 135°
6.50 1.90
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
180° 225°
30.20 4.50
16.01 0.00
0.32 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
270° 315°
6.06
1.21
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0 . 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0 . 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
0.00
0. 00
0. 00
B-86
-------
Cu.m vxl at ive Distribution. of Currents
Site A Top
Current Speed (M/Sec)
Figure 30. Cumulative distribution of current velocities at top
grid point for Site A.
B-87
-------
C-umval ative Distrib \j.t ion of Currents
Site A Bottom
Current Speed (M/Sec)
Figure 31. Cumulative distribution of current velocities at
bottom grid point for Site A.
B-88
-------
Cumulative Distribution of Currents
Site B Top
C i" e 111 Speed. (M/Scc)
Figure 32. Cumulative distribution of current velocities at top
grid point for Site B.
B-89
-------
Cumulative Distribution of Currcnls
Site B Bottom
Current Speed (M/Soc)
Figure 33. Cumulative distribution of current velocities at
bottom grid point for Site B.
B-90
-------
At the surface levels at sites A and B some currents exceed 0.6 m/sec.
It should also be noted that there appears to be an approximate balance
in the percentages of onshore-offshore currents.
Since the model runs for climatological purposes were each allowed
to attain steady-state conditions, transient effects, such as those
associated with changes in wind speeds and directions and tidal fluctu-
ations, are not present in the results shown here. However, about
two thirds of all of the measured currents at sites A and B are directed
at angles within 30 degrees of parallel to the coast; over 80 percent of
all measured currents greater than 20 cm/sec are aligned within these
same directed bands; and over 95 percent of all measured currents
greater than 40 cm/sec fall within these directions. Thus, although
transient effects are certainly present, they are not dominant features
of the current regime; and the representation of currents shown here
should provide a good overall picture of the expected currents.
B-91
-------
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this study we have employed a numerical model which incorporates
a k-e closure method in the vertical dimensions. Calibration of this
model has demonstrated that it can reasonably represent both the magni-
tude and structure of the currents in the vicinity of proposed dredged
material disposal sites A and B. Exercising the model with winds from
historical hurricanes (Hurricanes Eloise and Frederic), it was found
that alongshore currents of approximately 1 m/sec could be expected
during these events, with the dominant current direction along the
coast. Using climatological statistics of winds from nearby Pensacola
airport combined with steady-state runs of the current model, expected
current roses for the top and bottom levels in the model were con-
structed for sites A and B. These results indicated that the clima-
tological currents should be oriented primarily along the coast, with
only a small proportion of low current speeds directed normal to the
coast. Thus, any dispersion of dredged material should occur primarily
in the along the coast direction. Since the percentages of offshore and
onshore currents are approximately equal, the primary climatological
effect of the currents should be to disperse and dredge material in
extremely eccentric ellipses with the major axes parallel to the coast.
Since currents out of the west occur more frequently than those out of
the east, any associated net transport should be directed toward the
east.
B-92
-------
7. REFERENCES
Blumberg, A. F., and G. L. Mellor, 1979: A whole basin model of the
Gulf of Mexico. Proc., 6th OTEC Conf., G. L. Dugger, Ed.,
Washington, D.C.
Chapman, R. S., 1982: Numerical simulation of two-dimensional separated
flow in a symmetric open channel expansion using the depth-i integrated
two-equation (k-e) turbulence model. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Chapman, R. S., 1983: Two-equation, depth-integrated turbulence closure
for modeling geometry-dominated flows. Misc. Paper EL-83-3, U.S. Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Large, W. G., and S. Pond, 1980: Open ocean momentum flux measurements
in moderate to strong winds. J.. Phys. Oceanoqr., 11, No. 3, 324-336.
Launder, B. E., and D. B. Spalding, 1974: The numerical calculation of
turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Appl. Mech. and Enqr., 3.
Murray, S. P., 1975: Trajectories and speeds of wind-driven curents
near the coast. _J. Phys. Oceanoqr., 5, No. 2, 347-360.
Resio, D. T., and C. L. Vincent, 1977: Estimation of winds over the
Great Lakes. ASCE J. Waterway Port Coastal Ocean Div. 103, 265-283.
Schroeder, 1976: Personal communication provided from Dr. Rudy Hollman.
Tennekes, H., and J. L. Lumley, 1972: A First Course in Turbulence, MIT
Press, Cambridge, MA.
B-93
-------
APPENDIX C
Environmental Protection Agency-
Water and Sediment
Quality Data
Site B
Site C
-------
Site B
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
November 1986
April 1987
July 1987
SEDIMENT DATA
Sediment Nutrients
November 1986
April 1987
Heavy Metals
November 1986
April 1987
Pesticide/PCB/Extrable Organics
Grain Size Analysis
November 1986
April 1987
C-l
-------
PENSACOLA SITE B
SITE HATER NURTIENT ANALVSIS
NOVEMBER 1886
CONVENTIONAL
STA.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STA
PARAMETERS
BIO
Bll
B12
B13
Bll
B15
B16
B17
AMMONIA
TOP
.09
ND
.16
ND
ND
ND
ND
. 17
HID
.05
.15
ND
. 15
ND
ND
.38
.11
BOT
ND
.07
ND
. 11
ND
ND
ND
.06
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BOT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
n
TOP
.13
.21
.2
.28
.23
.23
.11 .
.21
¦
ts>
HID
.13
.8
.25
.21
.17
.21
.51
.22
BOT
.36
.23
.18
.3
.19
. 11
.18
. 16
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HID
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BOT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration in ng/1
ND = Not Detected at hininun Detection Linit
NR = Not Analyzed
Top - 1 foot beloH surface; Hid - 50K total depth; Bot = 1 foot above bottom
-------
PENSRCOLfl SITE B
SITE MHTER NURTIENT ANALYSIS
APRIL 1987
CONVENTIONAL STR. STR. STR. STH. Sffl. STR. STR. STR.
PRRRhETERS BIO BU B12 B13 B1H BIS B16 Bl?
AHHONIA
TOP ND .09 ND ND HD .09 HO ND
HID NO .08 ND NO NO ND NO ND
BOT ND ND .09 ND ND ND ND .0?
NITRRTE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP ND .1 ND ND NO ND .2? ND
HID ND ND ND ND NO .OS .25 ND
BOT ND .05 .05 ND ND ND .25 .09
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOP ND ND .35 ND ND ND ND ND
HID ND ND ND ND ND .29 ND ND
BOT ND .31 ND ND ND ND NO ND
TOTflL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP .02 NO ND ND ND ND ND ND
HID ND ND ND ND .0*1 NO ND ND
BOT .05 .02 .05 ND ND ND ND .02
Concentration in ng/1
ND = Not Detected at Minimum Detection Li nit
Top = 1 foot belou surface; Mid = SOS total depth; Bot = 1 foot above botton
-------
PENSRCOLR SITE B
SITE WRTER NURTIENT RNflLVSIS
JULV 198?
conventional sta. str. srn. str. str. str. str. str.
PRRAHETERS BIO Bll B12 B13 B11 B15 B16 Bl?
AHHONIR
TOP NO NO NO ND NO ND NO ND
HID ND NO ND ND ND NO ND ND
BOr ND NO NO ND ND ND NO NO
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP ND ND ND ND NO NO NO ND
HID ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BOT ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
n TOP .11 .31 .26 .56 .¦11 .1 .36 .3
HID 1 .33 .35 .38 .38 .35 .31 .36
BOT .33 .36 .13 .32 .55 .38 .3? .35
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND
HID NO ND NO ND ND ND ND NO
BOT ND ND ND ND ND .03 ND ND
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
TOP 1.2 ND 1.3 1.3 1 1 1 NO
HID NO NO 1 1.2 1 ND 1.6 ND
BOT NO ND 1 1.1 ND 1 1 ND
Concentration in ng/1
ND = Not Detected at HiniMun Detection Li nits
Top = 1 foot belou surface; Hid = 50K n«ter depth; Bot = 1 foot above botton
-------
SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS
SITE B, NOVEMBER 1988
CONVENTIONAL
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
PARAMETERS
B1
B2
B3
B1
B5
B6
B7
B3
B9
BIO
AMMONIA
2.6
2.9
7.9
6.1
7.9
6
6
7.6
6.2
5.3
TKN
90
88
89
130
120
HO
100
82
65
66
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
28
30
13
32
31
34
29
15
29
21
OIL AND GREASE
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
n
i
Cn
CONVENTIONAL
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
PARAMETERS
Bll
B12
B13
B11
B15
B16
817
B16
B19
B20
AMMONIA
5.7
1
3.1
2.8
ND
ND
3.8
5.6
1.2
ND
TKN
51
110
67
51
35
72
61
18
71
10
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
30
40
37
32
26
25
26
33
31
10
OIL AND GREASE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration in ng/kg
NO = Not Detected at Hininun Detection Linits
-------
SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS
SITE B, APRIL 1387
CONVENTIONAL
STH.
ST A.
5TA.
STH.
5TA.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STH.
STH.
PARAMETERS
B1
B2
B3
B1
BS
B6
B7
B8
B9
BIO
AMMONIA
5.8
12
8.9
9.6
8.9
8.2
10
10
16
5.3
TKN
53
71
19
58
61
55
58
50
65
67
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
12
18
6
7
ND
15
5
ND
5
9
OIL AND GREASE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n
I
cn
CONVENTIONAL
STA.
STA.
STA.
STR.
STA.
STA.
STH.
STH.
STA.
STH.
PARAMETERS
Bll
B12
B13
Bll
B15
BIS
B17
B.10
B19
B20
AMMONIA
10
6.6
11
7.4
8.2
12
9.8
9.1
8.1
15
TKN
71
55
85
71
85
83
66
66
61
73
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
7
13
8
6
8
10
22
21
6
22
OIL AND GREASE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Hininun Detection Linits
-------
SEDIMENT HERVV HETRL CONCENTRRTIONS
SITE B, NOVEMBER 1986
STB. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR.
ELEMENT B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B? B8 B9 BIO
Rg
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Rs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HD
ND
ND
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Co
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1.4
1.5
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.6
1.9
1.6
1.1
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Se
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Sr
50
96
160
76
48
54
45
76
32
100
Te
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Ti
3.9
2.6
2.4
3.4
2.6
4.5
2
14
4.2
1.5
V
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.1
1.5
ND
1.4
1
ND
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Z n
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HI
no
130
160
160
140
150
110
190
110
79
Mn
ND
2.?
3.2
2.9
ND
ND
ND
4.8
ND
ND
Ca
9300
13000
25000
11000
7600
7500
7600
11000
4900
16000
Mg
500
720
1500
720
610
720
700
710
610
350
Fe
280
320
410
420
420
450
270
340
260
200
Na
1800
2100 .
1900
1900
2000
1800
1800
2100
1500
1900
Concentration in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected Rt Mini mum Detection Linit
-------
SEDIMENT HEAVY1 NETAL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE B, NOVEMBER 1986
srn. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR.
ELEMENT Bll B12 B13 BH B15 B16 Bl? B18 B19 B20
Rg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Rs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cd
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
HD
ND
ND
Co
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1.2
1.1
1.8
1
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.9
2
1.5
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
Ni
ND
NO
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
Se
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sr
83
100
15
15
85
130
70
210
290
290
To
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ti
2
2.2
3.8
3.1
2.5
2.2
3.7
2.8
1.6
3.1
V
ND
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.2
1
2.3
1.8
1.1
y
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
1.5
1.2
Zn
ND
ND
ND
1
NO
NO
ND
1.1
1.1
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
R1
96
110
110
110
120
120
130
220
210
190
Mn
ND
3.5
2.6
ND
NO
3.9
ND
1.8
•
00
7.9
Ca
13000
11000
6800
7200
12000
17000
11000
37000
16000
18000
hg
73u
350
660
580
660
910
610
1100
2500
1500
Fe
200
180
350
320
120
310
260
660
790
510
Na
1800
1900
2500
1800
1600
3000
2000
2300
2700
2600
Concentrations in nq/kq
NO = Not Detected at Mininun Detection Linit
-------
SEDIMENT HERVV HETRL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE B, RPRIL 198?
STfl. STR. STfl. STfl. STfl. STfl. STfl. STH. STR. STR.
ELEMENT B1 B2 B3 B1 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 BIO
fg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ns
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Cd
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Co
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1.1
1.2
1.8
1.1
1.8
2.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.3
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
So
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Sr
61
50
70
160
82
98
91
17
71
17
To
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
Ti
1.8
1.7
2.8
I.E.
3.6
2.6
1.8
2.1
3.1
2
V
1
ND
1.3
1.5
1.1
2
ND
1.3
1.1
1
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
NO
ND
ND
2n
NO
ND
ND
ND
1
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HI
110
11
1200
110
160
230
110
120
110
110
Mn
ND
3.5
ND
1.3
3.1
5.3
3.1
ND
ND
ND
Ca
8000
8000
10000
12000
12000
15000
11000
7100
11000
7000
Ng
670
700
910
1100
810
960
660
710
910
700
Fo
290
270
310
110
510
630
270
290
230
280
Na
2100
2300
2200
2200
2100
2300
2600
2600
2800
2100
Concentration in rtg/kg
ND = Not Detectable at Mininun Detection Li nits
-------
SEDIMENT HERVV HETHL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE B, RPRIL 198?
STR.
STR.
STR.
STfl.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STR.
STfl.
STR.
ELEMENT
Bll
B12
B13
Bll
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B20
flg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HD
ND
ND
ND
HD
fis
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Co
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MO
ND
Cr
1.7
1.6
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.8
l.B
1.7
1.6
1.3
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5b
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Se
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
HD
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Sr
30
38
55
120
16
36
120
86
130
150
Te
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ti
3.7
3
3
2.5
3.3
3.6
1.5
3.1
2.2
6.1
V
1.1
1
1.3
1.3
NO
1.1
1.7
1.3
1.7
1.3
Y
NO
MD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Zti
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
1.7
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
HI
130
110
120
170
11
110
200
150
250
220
Mn
ND
2.7
ND
5
ND
2.7
5
3.8
7
5.6
Ca
1600
5500
9100
17000
6300
5000
16000
13000
20000
21000
Mg
630
710
710
1300
560
600
1300
810
970
1100
Fe
370
260
310
530
260
260
610
500
81
120
Na
1900
2100
2700
2500
2100
2600
2100
2100
2500
2600
Concentration in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Hinitiun Detection Li nits
-------
The following is a listing of pesticide, PCB, and extractable organic
compounds that were analyzed for in sediments from each of seven
stations in alternative Site B and alternative Site C during November
1986 and April 1987. None of the compounds on the list were detected
at any station in concentrations in excess of the minimum detection
limit. See Appendix A for a discussion of the sampling program.
Oil
-------
PESTICIDE/PCB/EXTRACTABLE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EXPOXIDE
ALPHR-BHC
BETfl-BHC
GRNMR-BHC CLINDANE)
DELTR-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
1,4'-DDT CP,P'-DDT)
4,T-DDE CP,P*-DDE)
4,
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OF SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE B
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, OCT. - NOV., 1986
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as % dry weight)
Medium Fine Coarse Medium Fine
Station Gravel Gravel Sand Sand Sand Silt Clay TOTALS
B1
0.00
0.00
3.91
0.03
40.34
0.11
54.69
0.06
0.09
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.41
0.31
99.47
0.53
B2
0.00
0.00
1.71
0.07
38.07
0.09
58.72
0.09
0.11
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.80
0.24
99.42
0.59
B3
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.03
28.46
0.07
69.31
0.09
0.16
0.01
0.07
0.03
0.94
0.28
99.49
0.51
B4
0.56
0.02
2.11
0.04
40.85
0.00
55.49
0.06
0.11
0.00
0.11
0.02
0.51
0.12
99.74
0.26
B5
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.02
43.64
0.13
53.76
0.06
0.11
0.00
0.13
0.05
0.60
0.14
99.60
0.40
B6
0.00
0.00
1.08
0.04
42.98
0.04
54.13
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.91
0.45
99.24
0.68
B7
0.00
0.00
1.85
0.02
46.03
0.08
50.78
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.91
0.09
99.70
0.30
B8
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.02
4.79
0.05
93.32
0.16
0.31
0.03
0.13
0.05
0.75
0.32
99.37
0.63
B9
0.00
0.00
1.17
0.01
62.13
0.07
35.67
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.80
0.04
99.86
0.14
B10
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.01
47.34
0.10
50.93
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.44
0.40
99.39
0.61
Bll
3.57
0.08
3.47
0.07
42.61
0.06
49.42
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.31
0.21
99.51
0.49
B12
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.03
51.12
0.04
47.38
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.10
0.01
0.17
0.32
99.52
0.48
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-13
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OF SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE B
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, OCT. - NOV., 1986
(Continued)
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as % dry weight)
Station
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Gravel
Coarse
Sand
Medium
Sand
Fine
Sand
Silt
Clay
TOTALS
B13
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.03
9.03
0.03
89.41
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.15
0.04
0.52
0.34
99.41
0.59
B14
0.00
0.00
0.88
0.06
57.88
0.11
39.96
0.07
0.04
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.56
0.33
99.38
0.62
B15
0.00
0.00
7.46
0.10
56.61
0.13
34.45
0.10
0.09
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.75
0.22
99.39
0.61
B16
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.00
12.66
0.00
86.26
0.04
0.09
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.30
0.12
99.83
0.17
B17
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
21.16
0.13
77.15
0.03
0.19
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.96
0.03
99.80
0.20
B18
0.00
0.00
3.02
0.06
40.53
0.17
54.04
0.07
0.25
0.00
0.19
0.06
1.34
0.25
99.38
0.62
B19
0.00
0.00
3.20
0.00
39.81
0.21
54.90
0.10
0.16
0.00
0.31
0.10
0.91
0.30
99.29
0.71
B20
0.00
0.00
7.60
0.08
46.75
0.15
43.58
0.04
0.20
0.02
0.30
0.11
0.95
0.22
99.37
0.63
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-14
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OF SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE B
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APRIL 1987
Inorganic Fraction subtented by organic fraction
(all as % total dry weight)
Station
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Gravel
Coarse
Sand
Medium
Sand
Fine
Sand
Silt
Clay
TOTALS
B1
0.00
0.00
2.48
0.04
41.47
0.06
54.71
0.09
0.09
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.82
0.15
99.64
0.36
B2
0.00
0.00
1.59
0.04
35.07
0.01
62.14
0.08
0.21
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.62
0.14
99.72
0.28
B3
0.00
0.00
1.54
0.05
41.72
0.16
55.89
0.05
0.16
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.33
99.34
0.66
B4
0.00
0.00
5.33
0.10
51.26
0.04
41.78
0.08
0.20
0.00
0.08
0.07
0.67
0.39
99.32
0.68
B5
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.08
41.95
0.13
54.38
0.10
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.77
0.32
99.30
0.70
B6
0.00
0.00
2.02
0.08
40.12
0.10
56.22
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.17
0.06
0.96
0.15
99.59
0.41
B7
0.00
0.00
2.44
0.05
48.20
0.08
47.71
0.00
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.95
0.34
99.43
0.57
B8
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.05
14.90
0.03
83.21
0.08
0.27
0.00
0.09
0.04
0.88
0.14
99.65
0.35
B9
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.00
39.34
0.06
58.82
0.06
0.08
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.87
0.27
99.57
0.43
BIO
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
32.62
0.04
65.17
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.11
0.00
0.70
0.80
99.03
0.97
Bll
2.48
0.05
2.80
0.06
43.07
0.06
49.82
0.04
0.16
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.94
0.36
99.36
0.64
B12
0.00
0.00
1.26
0.03
46.08
0.07
50.94
0.06
0.12
0.02
0.07
0.01
1.13
0.21
99.60
0.40
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" nay be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-15
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OF SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE B
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APRIL 1987
(Continued]
Inorganic Fraction subtented by organic fraction
(all as % total dry veight)
Station
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Gravel
Coarse
Sand
Medium
Sand
Fine
Sand
Silt
Clay
TOTALS
B13
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.01
31.51
0.06
66.65
0.07
0.11
0.01
0.11
0.07
0.42
0.40
99.39
0.61
B14
0.00
0.00
0.98
0.01
42.53
0.06
55.31
0.05
0.16
0.04
0.07
0.01
0.18
0.61
99.23
0.77
BIS
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.03
9.61
0.07
87.90
0.14
0.18
0.04
0.08
0.07
1.02
0.28
99.38
0.62
B17
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.10
25.90
0.13
70.19
0.07
0.18
0.01
0.07
0.04
0.56
0.40
99.25
0.75
B18
0.00
0.00
2.63
0.06
40.51
0.14
55.37
0.06
0.20
0.01
0.21
0.06
0.51
0.25
99.43
0.57
B19
0.00
0.00
3.64
0.05
38.96
0.13
56.12
0.05
0.13
0.00
0.13
0.02
0.71
0.07
99.68
0.32
B20
0.00
0.00
10.58
0.15
35.46
0.15
52.06
0.02
0.30
0.02
0.18
0.02
0.95
0.09
99.53
. 0.47
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-16
-------
Percent Light Transmission Through Water
Column. Pensacola, Florida, November 19?6
DEPTH (ft)
O
CO
oo
CO
z:
<
(Z
i—
IE
O
-------
Percent Light Transmission Through Water
Column, Pensacola, Florida, April 1987
DEPTH (ft)
z
o
tn
uo
CO
<
tn
I—
h-
o
-------
Penaacola Sice B Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature Records
from Water Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths, November 1986,
April 1987, July 1987
S tation
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved OxyRen(mg/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
TemperatureCC)
PF-BLO
November 1986
1
6.7
34.2
d23. 3
33
6.6
35.8
23.9
65
6.5
36.4
23.9
PF-B10
April 1987
1
7.6
36.8
20.1
32
5.6
37.7
19.3
64
5.3
38.0
19.4
PF-B10
July 1987
1
6.0
34.0
29.6
30
5.8
34.9
29.7
60
5.6
35.6
29.0
PF-B11
November 1986
1
6.9
34.3
23. 1
32
6.5
36.1
24.0
63
6.5
36.3
24.0
PF-B11
April 1987
1
7.9
35.3
22.0
30
5.8
37.0
19.7
60
4.7
37.0
19.2
PF-B11
July 1987
1
5.9
34.5
29.9
30
5.8
34.9
29.8
60
5.5
35.7
28.8
PF-B12
November 1986
1
6.7
35.4
23.3
32
6.6
36.2
23.6
64
6.4
36.9
24.1
PF-B12
April 1987
1
7.7
36.2
21.1
30
5.4
37.2
19.3
60
4.7
37.3
19.4
PF-B12
July 1987
1
5.9
35.0
30.0
30
5.8
35.5
29.5
60
5.3
35.8
28.5
C-19
-------
Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature Records from Water
Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths, Pensacola, Florida,
November 1986, April 1987, July 1987
S cation
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved 0xyKen(mg/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
Temperature(°C)
PF-B13
November 1986
1
6.7
35.6
23.3
34
6.65
36.4
23.7
68
6.4
36.9
24.0
PF-B13
April 1987
1
7.6
36.5
20.3
30
7.6
36.5
20.3
60
5.4
37.3
19.5
PF-B13
July 1987
1
6.1
33.8
30.3
30
5.9
35.1
29.7
60
5.5
35.7
29.0
PF-B14
November 1986
1
6.6
34.1
23.6
31
6.7
36.0
23.6
61
6.3
36.6
24.2
PF-B14
April 1987
1
7.5
36.6
20.0
32
5.1
37.6
19.0
64
5.0
37.4
19.5
PF-B14
July 1987
1
6.0
33.4
29.8
30
5.8
35.0
29.7
60
5.6
35.7
29.1
PF-B15
November 1986
1
6.7
35.3
23.4
32
6.6
36.1
23.7
64
6.4
36.7
24.0
PF-B15
April 1987
1
8.1
36.5
21.3
35
5.1
37.8
19.4
70
5.0
37.9
19.3
PF-B15
July 1987
1
5.9
35.4
29.8
35
5.8
35.4
29.5
70
5.4
35.9
28.5
C-20
-------
Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature Records from Water
Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths, Pensacola, Florida,
November 1986, April 1987, July 1987
S tation
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
Temperature(°C)
PF-B16
November 1986
1
6.55
35.9
23.6
34
6.45
36.2
23.6
68
6.5
36.5
23.9
PF-B16
April 1987
1
7.5
35.0
21.8
34
7.6
35.8
20.8
68
7.3
37.2
19.8
PF-B16
July 1987
1
6.0
34.4
30.1
30
5.9
35.2
29.5
60
5.4
35.8
28.5
PF-B17
November 1986
1
7.0
33.7
23.3
33
6.5
36.2
23.9
66
6.5
36.7
24.0
PF-B17
April 1987
1
7.7
36.1
20.8
34
5.7
37.4
19.4
68
5.3
37.4
19.1
PF-B 17
July 1987
1
6.0
34.3
29.5
35
5.9
34.4
29.4
75
5.2
35.2
29.0
C-21
-------
Site C
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
November 1986
April 1987
July 1987
SEDIMENT DATA
Sediment Nutrients
November 1986
April 1987
Heavy Metals
November 1986
April 1987
Pesticide/PCB/Extrable Organics
Grain Size Analysis
November 1986
April 1987
C-22
-------
PENSflCOLfl SITE C
SITE HATER NURTIENT RNRLVSIS
NOVEMBER 1986
CONVENTIONAL STH. STR. STB. Sm. STR. STR. STR. STR.
PARAMETERS CIO CU C12 C13 CM C15 C16 CI?
o
RHMONIR
TOP .15 ND .07 .1 NO ND NO .08
HID ND .08 .19 .2 ND NO ND .09
BOr NO ND .08 .08 ND ND ND ND
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO
HID ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND
BOT ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND
TOTRL KJELDRHL NITROGEN
TOP .21 .15 .1 .1 ND ND .36 ND
O? HID .2 .23 .33 .38 ND ND ND ND
BOT .11 .12 ND ND ND ND ND ND
TDTRL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP NO ND ND ND ND ND .02 ND
HID ND ND ND NO ND ND ND NO
BOT ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Concentration in ng/1
ND = Not Detected at Minihuh Detection Linits
Top = 1 foot beloH surface; Mid = 50H water depth; Bot = 1 foot above botton
-------
PENSACOLA SITE C
SITE HATER NUTRIENT ANALVSIS
APRIL 198?
CONVENTIONAL STA. STH. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
PARBHETERS CIO Cll C12 C13 CH C15 C16 CI?
AMMONIA
TOP ND MD .09 ND ND .0? ND .08
MID .09 ND ND .08 .08 .07 ND ND
BOT .08 ND ND ND .09 ND ND ND
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP ND .29 ND ND .21 ND .3 ND
HID .05 .27 ND ND .25 ND .28 ND
BOT ND .29 ND ND .26 ND ND .29
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
' TOP ND ND .1 ND 1.2 ND ND ND
NJ
-C* HID ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BOT ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
HID NO ND ND ND ND NO ND ND
BOT ND ND .01 ND ND ND ND ND
Concentration in ng/1
ND - Not De+.ectnble at Hininun Detection Linits
Top = 1 foot b*iou surface; Mid = 50H uater depth; Bot = 1 foot above botton
-------
PENSRCOLR SITE C
SITE WATER NURTIENT RNHLVSIS
JULV 1987
CONVENTIONAL STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR.
PRRRHETERS CIO Cll C12 C13 C11 CIS C16 CI?
HHHONIR
TOP NO NO ND ND ND ND ND ND
MID ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BOr ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOP ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND
HID ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BOT ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOP .50 .12 .3? .37 .31 .11 .37 .71
HID .31 .16 .3 .35 .21 .3 .67 .19
BOT .33 .32 .32 .31 .71 .33 .93 .11
TOTflL-PHOSPHORUS
TOP ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND
HID ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
BOT ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
TOTRL ORGRNIC CRRBON
TOP 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 ND NO 1.2 1.7
HID ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND ND
BOT ND NO 1 ND ND ND ND ND
Concentration in ng/1
ND = Not Detectable at Mini nun Detection Liriits
Top = 1 foot beloH surface; Hid = SOX Hater depth; Bot = 1 foot above botton
-------
SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS
SITE C, NOVEMBER 1986
CONVENTIONAL
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfi.
STfl.
STfl.
STfi.
STfi.
STfi.
STfi.
PHRflhETERS
CI
C2
C3
C1
C5
C6
C?
C8
C9
CIO
RHHONIR
2.5
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.7
3
?.l
7.2
TKN
55
51
66
77
56
58
12
56
17
69
TOTRL-PHOSPHORUS
21
30
21
31
21
16
23
23
27
35
OIL RND GREASE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
n
i
to
o-
CONVENTIONAL
STfi.
STfi.
STfi.
STfi.
STfl.
STfl.
STfi.
STfl.
5TR.
STfl.
PARAMETERS
Cll
C12
C13
C11
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
flMHONIfi
ND
1.9
ND
1.7
3.6
2.9
3
3.2
3.1
3.5
TKN
53
62
15
71
71
61
60
87
71
67
TOTRL-PHOSPHORUS
30
23
20
27
31
19
11
25
20
27
OIL RND GREASE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Hininun Detection Linits
-------
SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS
SITE C, APRIL 1907
CONVENTIONAL STfl. STfl. STH. STfl. STfl. STfl. STfl. STA. STfl. STfl.
PflRRHETERS CI C2 C3 C1 C5 C£ C? C8 C9 CIO
RHHONIR
7.7
20
13
9.6
6
6.1
9
TKN
67
78
95
110
12
16
72
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
ND
9
8
11
10
5
9
OIL RND GRERSE
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
n
i
M
-J
CONVENTIONAL
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STfl.
STH.
PflRflHETERS
Cll
C12
C13
C11
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
RHHONIR
10
7.7
13
8
8
9.3
9.1
10
11
8.8
TKN
51
26
76
61
15
120
61
72
51
72
TOTRL-PHOSPHORUS
3
17
17
6
11
28
ND
8
1
12
OIL RND GRERSE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Mininun Detection Li nits
-------
SEDIHENT HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE C, NOVEMBER 1986
STA. STH. STA. STA. STA. STfi. STA. STf). STA. STA.
ELEHENT CI C2 C3 CI C5 C6 C? C8 C9 CIO
fig
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
As
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Co
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5
ND
ND
ND
1.0
1.3
1.6
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Se
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sr
30
11
110
170
25
67
390
39
83
53
Te
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ti
5.9
10
2.3
3.5
2.7
3.0
3.1
1.1
7.1
11
V
ND
ND
1.1
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0
V
ND
ND
ND
1.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Zn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
fll
110
140
130
160
73
78
130
92
99
170
fin
ND
2.7
1.1
7.7
ND
ND
5.5
ND
3.1
3.9
Ca
•1200
8200
17000
21000
3600
6600
63000
5600
12000
7500
Mg
510
630
690
1200
120
510
1000
520
860
770
Fe
180
230
350
530
130
99
160
130
210
280
Na
2600
2900
2100
3200
2200
2600
1100
2100
2900
2900
Concentrations in rig/kg
NO = Not Detected at Minimum Detection Linits
-------
SEDIMENT HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE C, NOVEMBER 1986
str. sta. sta. sta. sta. srn. sta. sta. sta. srR.
ELEMENT Cll C12 C13 C11 CIS C16 CI? C18 C19 C20
Ag
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
As
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.1
NO
HD
ND
ND
Be
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Co
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1.0
ND
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.0
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
HD
ND
NO
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Se
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sr
130
99
39
92
120
330
100 .
39
21
69
Te
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Ti
3.1
1.9
9.2
3.2
2.6
5.1
5.7
11
1.1
3.0
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
2n
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
fll
110
76
90
120
110
210
110
100
99
120
Mn
1.1
ND
ND
3.9
1.3
9.2
3.9
ND
ND
2.6
Ca
18000
11000
5200
13000
1G000
51000
17000
6600
3500
8500
Mg
1100
660
510
720
980
1700
1100
580
190
650
Fe
210
150
150
310
270
370
190
160
150
170
Na
2800
2500
2100
2200
1800
1800
2100
3100
2100
3000
Concentrations in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Mininun Detection Li nits
-------
SEDIMENT HEAVV METAL CONCENTRATIONS
SITE C, APRIL 1987
STA.
STH.
STA.
STA.
STH.
STA.
STA.
STA.
STR.
STA.
ELEMENT
CI
C2
C3
CI
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
CIO
Ag
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
As
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Cd
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Co
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
1
1.5
1.7
1.2
1
ND
ND
1.0
1.1
1.2
Cu
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5b
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
Se
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sr
55
66
99
100
11
37
65
39
71
53
Te
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Ti
1.2
2.6
1.3
2.2
3.3
2.1
1.2
1.1
1.8
1.7
V
ND
ND
1.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Zn
NO
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ai
76
9-4
130
100
92
120
99
82
810
85
Hn
2.6
3.3
5 .
3.6
3
2.5
2.5
ND
2.9
3.9
Cd
9000
11000
16000
11000
6700
6700
7700
5600
11000
1600
hg
680
810
1200
830
510
510
570
520
1100
560
Fe
180
250
390
270
160
160
150
130
210
200
Na
2700
3800
3700
2500
2200
2500
3000
2100
2900
2100
Concentrations in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Mini mum Detection Li nits
-------
SEDIMENT HERVV METFIL CONCENTRRTIONS
SITE C, APRIL 198?
SFfl. STR. STR. STR. STH. STR. STR. STR. STR. STR.
ELEHENT Cll C12 C13 CH C15 C16 CI? C18 C19 C20
flg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Rs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ba
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Be
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cd
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Co
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cr
ND
1
1.2
1.5
1.3
1.9
1.2
1.2
1.2
ND
Cu
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ni
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Pb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Se
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sn
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sr
52
11
81
12
76
91
31
21
170
95
Te
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Ti
1.1
2.2
2.5
1.5
1.2
7.9
1.3
2
ND
1.3
V
ND
ND
ND
1.1
ND
1.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
V
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
Zn
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
1.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
fll
76
83
120
120
8?
350
63
83
790
65
Mn
19
ND
3.9
39
3.6
8.1
NO
2.7
3.7
2.8
Ca
6900
6300
13000
6500
10000
13000
1500
3100
19000
15000
Mg
520
520
1000
620
790
1000
160
510
810
810
Fe
190
200
200
310
250
180
130
150
180
110
Na
2000
2000
2600
2200
2200
3700
2100
3000
3600
2800
Concentrations in ng/kg
ND = Not Detected at Hininun Detection Li nits
-------
The following is a listing of pesticide, PCB, and extractable organic
compounds that were analyzed for in sediments from each of seven
stations in alternative Site B and alternative Site C during November
1986 and April 1987. None of the compounds on the list were detected
at any station in concentrations in excess of the minimum detection
limit. See Appendix A for a discussion of the sampling program.
C-32
-------
PESTICIDE/PCB/EXTRRCTRBLE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
RLDRIN
HEPTRCHLOR
HEPTRCHLOR EXPOXIDE
RLPHR-BHC
BETR-BHC
GRMHR-SHC CLINDRNE)
OELTR-BHC
ENDOSULFRN I PHTHRLRTE
2-METHVL-1,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTRCHLOROPHENOL
BENZVL RLCOHOL
1-CHLORORNILINE
DIBENZOFURRN
2-METHVLNRPHITHRLENE
2-NITRORNILINE
3-NITROANILINE
1-NITROHNILINE
HEXRDECRNOIC RCID
1,3-01CHLOROBENZENE
1.1-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS C2-CHL0R0ETHVL) ETHER
2,1-01NETHVLPHENOL
2,1-01CHLOROPHENOL
2,1,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1-CHLORP-3-HETHYLPHENOL
BENZO Cfi) RNTHRRCENE
CHRVSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZI01NE
DI-N-OCTVLPHTHALRTE
BENZO CB RND/OR K) FLUORRNTHENE
BENZO CB RND/OR IO FLUORRNTHENE
BENZO-R-PVRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PVRENE
DIBENZO CR,H) RNTHRRCENE
BENZO CGHI) PERVLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,1-DINITROPHENOL
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OP SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE C
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, OCT. - NOV., 1986
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as % dry weight)
Station
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Gravel
Coarse
Sand
Medium
Sand
Fine
Sand
Silt
Clay
TOTALS
CI
0.00
0.00
1.86
0.00
36.73
0.01
60.47
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.13
0.00
0.45
0.27
99.71
0.29
C2
0.00
0.00
1.78
0.01
37.52
0.01
58.64
0.01
0.25
0.03
0.18
0.00
1.54
0.01
99.92
0.08
C3
0.00
0.00
1.78
0.05
47.39
0.13
49.62
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.47
0.42
99.37
0.63
C4
1.39
0.03
2.61
0.04
30.18
0.17
63.19
0.08
0.44
0.01
0.39
0.11
0.97
0.37
99.17
0.83
C5
0.00
0.00
1.38
0.00
21.65
0.04
75.32
0.07
0.30
0.00
0.26
0.05
0.94
0.00
99.84
0.16
C6
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
56.15
0.00
42.21
0.00
0.07
0.02
0.14
0.00
1.02
0.24
99.74
0.26
C7
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.01
5.10
0.05
92.57
0.10
0.30
0.01
0.13
0.02
0.86
0.27
99.53
0.47
C9
0.00
0.00
1.02
0.02
53.14
0.12
44.76
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.53
0.23
99.55
0.45
CIO
0.00
0.00
2.53
0.07
48.36
0.14
47.66
0.09
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.25
0.68
98.91
1.09
Cll
0.00
0.00
3.24
0.01
6.61
0.02
88.84
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.90
0.00
99.90
0.10
C12
0.00
0.00
1.28
0.02
36.13
0.00
62.18
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.13
0.08
99.90
0.10
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-34
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OP SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE C
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, OCT. - NOV., 1986
(Continued)
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as % dry weight)
Medium Fine Coarse Medium Fine
Station Gravel Gravel Sand Sand Sand Silt Clay TOTALS
C13
C14
CI 5
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
2.32
0.08
1.22
0.01
2.08
0.07
3.67
0.04
0.11
0.00
0.51
0.05
0.19
0.01
12.25
0.02
42.76
0.11
33.95
0.08
16.07
0.09
44.09
0.12
35.01
0.03
20.03
0.10
17.33
0.02
85.96
0.07
53.17
0.08
63.60
0.07
78.54
0.14
51.04
0.09
63.63
0.07
77.35
0.14
80.79
0.10
0.16
0.01
0.23
0.04
0.26
0.01
1.19
0.03
0.10
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.32
0.04
0.19
0.00
0.13
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.11
0.02
0.51
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.03
0.12
0.09
0.15
0.04
0.76
0.24
0.65
0.42
0.60
0.08
0.58
0.58
0.64
0.15
0.69
0.19
0.83
0.43
0.52
0.66
99.59
0.41
99.21
0.79
99.73
0.27
98.98
1.02
99.56
0.44
99.68
0.32
99.16
0.84
99.17
0.83
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-35
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OP SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE C
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APRIL 1987
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as % total dry weight)
Station
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Gravel
Coarse
Sand
Medium
Sand
Fine
Sand
Silt
Clay
TOTALS
)
CI
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.02
27.64
0.07
69.97
0.08
0.12
0.00
0.10
0.01
0.60
0.66
99.15
0.85
C2
0.00
0.00
5.68
0.09
43.12
0.08
49.71
0.07
0.04
0.01
0.07
0.03
0.82
0.27
99.45
0.55
C3
0.00
0.00
4.26
0.13
42.11
0.10
51.66
0.08
0.18
0.03
0.23
0.06
0.79
0.38
99.22
0.78
C4
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.02
32.89
0.08
65.24
0.07
0.10
0.00
0.11
0.01
1.03
0.09
99.72
0.28
C5
0.00
0.00
1.12
0.05
22.95
0.06
74.26
0.12
0.10
0.02
0.16
0.02
0.83
0.28
99.43
0.57
C6
0.00
0.00
0.63
0.01
19.93
0.06
78.08
0.09
0.16
0.00
0.18
0.01
0.85
0.00
99.83
0.17
C7
0.00
0.00
0.74
0.02
13.33
0.01
83.97
0.06
0.28
0.00
0.10
0.04
1.23
0.20
99.66
0.34
C9
0.00
0.00
0.82
0.04
49.30
0.10
48.99
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.24
0.38
99.42
0.58
CIO
0.00
0.00
1.81
0.04
40.42
0.11
56.01
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.16
0.07
0.87
0.37
99.34
0.66
Cll
0.00
0.00
2.14
0.05
34.32
0.07
61.54
0.08
0.15
0.01
0.09
0.02
1.23
0.30
99.48
0.52
CI 2
0.00
0.00
6.49
0.09
32.89
0.12
58.67
0.11
0.30
0.02
0.22
0.05
0.66
0.38
99.32
0.77
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals, or other matter.
C-36
-------
PARTICLE SIZE* OF SEDIMENTS AT SELECTED STUDY STATIONS
PROPOSED OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITE C
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APRIL 1987
(Continued)
Inorganic fraction subtended by organic fraction
(all as I total dry weight)
Medium Fine Coarse Medium Fine
Station Gravel Gravel Sand Sand Sand Silt Clay TOTALS
C13
0.00
0.00
1.23
0.08
13.09
0.08
83.25
0.13
0.32
0.01
0.07
0.06
0.95
0.73
98.91
1.09
CI 4
0.00
0.00
1.24
0.01
44.89
0.01
52.76
0.01
0.08
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.73
0.21
99.74
0.26
C15
0.00
0.00
2.07
0.02
33.42
0.08
62.69
0.07
0,12
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.96
0.50
99.31
0.69
C16
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.02
9.11
0.02
88.71
0.12
0.13
0.00
0.15
0.05
0.84
0.69
99.09
0.91
C17
0.00
0.00
2.30
0.02
43.31
0.08
53.13
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.73
0.23
99.53
0.47
C18
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
3.81'
0.00
94.'18
0.14
0.22
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.85
0.49
99.29
0.71
C19
0.00
0.00
0.71
0.01
.29,73
0.01
68.16
0,03
0,09
0.01
0.17
0:01
0.86
0.20
99.72
0.28
C20
0:00"
0.00
1.26
0.02
25.00
0.04
72.'36
0.09
0.07
0.01
0.17
0.02
0.84
0.12
99.69
0.31
* Particle size headings are not indicative of the composition of the
material retained in sieving. For example, material reported under the
heading "Medium Gravel" may be wood, shells, minerals or other matter.
C-37
-------
Percent Light Transmission Through Water
Column, Pensacola, Florida, November 1986
20 40 60 80
0 20 40 60 80
0 10 20 30 40 50
20 40 60 80
C-38
-------
Percent Light Transmission Through Water
Column, Pensacola, Florida, April 1987
DEPTH (ft)
100"
I
z:
o
c/)
CO
z:
<
a:
h-
H-
x
o
PF C11
40 60 80
80 100
C-39
-------
Pensacola, Site C Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature
Records from Water Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths,
November 1986, April 1987, July 1987
Station
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved Oxygen(mg/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
TemperatureCC)
PF-C10
November 1986
1
6.45
36.4
24.1
34
6.45
36.4
23.8
68
6.45
36.7
24.2
PF-C10
April 1987
1
7.7
35.1
22.7
34
7.6
36.2
20.6
68
5.8
37.7
20.1
PF-C10
July 1987
1
6.3
31.8
29.7
30
6.0
34.8
29.7
65
5.2
35.7
28.2
PF-C11
November 1986
1
6.4
36.2
23.6
36
6.45
36.4
23.6
72
6.4
36.8
24.2
PF-C11
April 1987
1
7.8
34.7
•
CM
37
7.4
36.8
19.9
74
5.9
37.5
20.1
PF-C11
July 1987
1
6.3
31.4
29.7
35
6.0
35.3
29.6
70
5.3
35.9
28.1
PF-C12
November 1986
1
6.4
36.8
24.1
38
6.3
36.7
24.2
75
6.3
36.6
24.1
PF-C12
April 1987
1
7.7
34.5
21.9
39
7.6
36.0
19.9
78
5.7
37.0
20.0
PF-C12
July 1987
1
6.3
31.9
30.0
35
6.0
35.3
29.5
70
5.2
36.1
27.8
C-40
-------
Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature Recotis from Water
Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths, Pensarila, Florida,
November 1986, April 1987, July 1987
Station
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved Oxygen(n«/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
Temperature("C)
PF-C13
November 1986
1
6.4
36.4
24.0
36
6.4
36.4
24.0
72
6.4
36.6
24.1
PF-C13
April 1987
1
7.8
35.1
21.0
36
7.6
37.0
19.7
73
5.7
37.4
19.6
PF-C13
July 1987
1
6.4
32.0
30.1
35
6.0
35.0
29.7
70
5.4
36.0
28.0
PF-C14
November 1986
1
6.4
35.8
23.5
34
6.4
36.0
23.5
68
6.3
36.6
24.0
PF-C14
April 1987
1
7.15
35.6
21.9
38
7.0
37.2
19.7
76
6.7
37.3
19.6
PF-C14
July 1987
1
6.0
34.4
30.4
30
5.9
35.0
29.7
60
5.3
35.9
28.7
PF-C15
November 1986
1
6.0
24.2
39
6.0
-
24.2
77
6.0
—
24.2 ,
PF-C15
April 1987
1
7.7
34.7
21.6
37
7.6
36.4
20.1
75
5.8
37.7
19.8
PF-C15
July 1987
1
6.1
34.9
29.8
35
6.0
35.7
29.3
70
5.2
36.1
27.8
C-41
-------
Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity and Temperature Records from Water
Column Surface, Middle and Bottom Depths, Pensacola, Florida,
November 1986, April 1987, July 1987
Station
Sampling Period
Depth(ft)
Dissolved OxyKen(mg/L)
Salinity (o/oo)
Temperature(°C)
PF-C16
November 1986
1
5.8
37.0
24.5
45
5.8
37.0
24.9
95
5.8
37.0
24.8
PF-C16
April 1987
1
7.5
34.4
22.5
46
6.1
37.5
19.9
93
5.9
37.6
20.3
PF-C16
July 1987
1
6.3
32.2
30.4
40
5.8
35.3
29.4
80
5.6
36.3
27.3
PF-C17
November 1986
1
6.4
36.5
23.8
33
6.4
36.4
23.8
66
6.35
36.8
24.6
PK-C17
April 1987
1
7.7
34.7
22.9
33
7.8
35.4
20.6
66
6.0
37.1
19.7
PF-C17
July 1987
1
6.2
32.0
29.5
30
5.9
35.0
29.4
60
5.0
35.9
28.3
C-42
-------
APPENDIX D
Characteristics of Dredged Material
1. Physical/Chemical Data
2. Effects of Sediment From Two Locations Near the
Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station on Representative
Marine Organisms
3. Chemical Analysis of Sediment From Two Sites Near the
Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station and Tissues of
Marine Organisms Exposed to the Sediment
-------
APPENDIX D
Characteristics of Dredged Material
Physical/Chemical Data
Source: Navy 1987
D-l
-------
w
10*
•7"V
ft wwcom/i
VONJM STATION
KNSACOLA-MAVV m0MC»O«T
station location plan
D-2
-------
29
WENTWORTH SCALE-
SUWVWY
OF
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
REACH 1
1/
Gravel
S^atlonjtoSawple No. (Shell) Sand Clay
2/
S-1
S-2
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-1
S-5
S-1
S-2
S-2
S-3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-1
S-2
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
0.0
0.?
0.0
11.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
32.5
3.5
86.5
81.5
13.5
59.0
30.5
83.5
37.5
28.5
8.0
97.0
97.5
50.0
91.5
98.0
36.0
36.5
3.0
9.5
59.5
20.0
47.0
31.5
60.0
9-5
7.0
27.0
20.0
22.5
( 5.0 )
36.0 23.5
37.5
45.5
33.5
46.5
0.5 1.5
< 2.5 )
32.5 17.0
5.0 3.0
( 1.5 >
STATISTICS. PARAMETERS (FOLK'S)
Sorting
Median Coefficient Shewness
5.300
8.800
2.350
1.950
5-850
3.000
4.850
1.200
4.650
5.950
7.850
2.150
1.650
3.950
2.600
1.750
3.640
2.850
1.850
1.980
3.170
3.750
3.050
1.690
3.470
3.580
3.420
0.760
0.460
3.770
1.030
0.790
0.42
0.17
0.48
0.34
0.50
0.69
0.52
-0.12
0.53
0.26
0.14
-0.04
-0.08
0.32
0.31
-0.11
Kurtosls
0-80
0.76
5.65
3.10
1.06
0.97
1.10
1.76
1.31
0.82
0.65
1.15
1.38
0.94
1.74
1.02
S-1
S-2
0.0
0.0
97.0
97.0
3.0
3.0
2.550
1.250
0.610
0.690
0.25
0.10
1.29
0.92
S-1
S-2
0.0
1.0
97.5
96.5
2.5
2.5
2.500
1.700
0.500
0.720
0.23
-0.05
1.17
1.28
10
11
S-2
S-4
S-1
S-2
0.0
0.5
4.5
2.5
97.5
22.5
93.0
57.0
(
55.0
2.5
)
22.0
( 2.5 )
19.5 21.0
2.250
4.750
1.700
2.350
0.640
3.100
1-060
4.460
-0.29
0.46
-0.21
0.58
1.10
1.42
1.51
0.92
12
S-1
S-2
S-3
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.0
42.5
78.0
( 3.0 )
30.5 27.0
14.5 7.5
1.950
4.550
2.250
0.670
3.930
2.460
0.42
0.41
0.48
1.37
0.79
1.56
13
14
S-1
S-3
S-1
S-2
0.0
0.5
0.5
10.0
97.5
34.0
98.0
40.5
( 2.5 >
44.0 21.5
( 1.5 )
23.5 26.0
2.300
4.550
1.500
3.950
0.610
3.390
0.770
4.910
-0-07
0.32
-0.07
0.22
1.17
1.21
0.91
0.80
15
S-1
S-2
2.0
0.0
96.0
22.5
( 2.0 )
38.0 39.5
— Wentorth Seals Size Classifications:
Gravel(Sh*lI)/Sand Separation - 2.00 mm
Sand/Silt Separation - 0.0625 mm
Silt/Clay Separation - 0.0039 mm
1.350
6.350
"k.! Percent
1.280
4.090
-0.17
0.19
1.84
0.74
D-3
-------
SUMMARY
OF
GEO TECHNICAL data
REACH 2
WEHTHWORTH XH.tr- STATISTICAL PARAMETERS (FOLK'S)
Station No*
Sanple
Gr avel
No. (Shell)
Sand
Silt
Clav
Median
Sorting
Coefficient
Ske«ness
Kur tos1s
16
S-l
0.0 V
98.5
(
1.5 )
1.800
0.640
0.05
1.06
S-2
14.0
59.5
25.5
5.0
1.900
2.760
0.08
0l92
1 7
S-l
0.5
94.0
3.0
2.5
2.200
1.080
0.002
1.38
S-2
10.5
59.0
19.5
11.0
2.350
3.290
0.17
1.50
in
S-2
0.0
9J.0
0.5
4.5
1.700
1.040
0.19
1.96
S-J
t.o
33.5
43.9
22.0
4.450
3.800
0.33
1.30
19
S-l
0.0
98.0
(
2.0 )
1.850
0.790
0.02
1.09
S-J
1.0
25.5
41.9
33.0
5.900
4.040
0.20
0.89
- wentworth Seal* Slz« Classifications: 2/ Percent
Q avel(Shell)/Sand Separation - 2.00 mi
Sand/Silt Separation - 0*0629 mi
SI It/Clay Separation - 0.0039 mm
D-4
-------
SUMMARY
OF
GBOTECHNICAL DATA
(COMPOSITE SAMPLES)
REACH 1
WENTVORTH SCALE
Scatton No
Gravel
(Shell)
Silt
Reach I
1.1
68.6
30.3
D-5
-------
Sice Ihter/ELutriate Results NAS 1\imlng Basin and Pensaoola Bay Bit ranee Channel, 1984
"Cbntrol-
Uater
Station
Station
Station
Station
Station
Station
Sea
Quality
Parameter
1
2
3
4
5
6
Uater
Standard
Mercury - Site Water
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
Mercury - Elutriate (Avg.)
<•1
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
<.1
-------
Averaged Results of Sedlirat Analyses for Pensacda, Florida Sanples Oollected March 1986
Site Average
Constituent*
1
3
6
8
10
49
50
51
CtuBtal Material**
Al
34,400
10,835
1,385
565
284
14,850
3,595
13,795
83,200
Cd
0.245
0.055
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
0.09
0.08
0.0625
0.2
Cr
91.7
28
3.145
3.355
2.405
40.9
4.27
33
XX)
Pb
2.05
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.1
<1.0
12.5
Hg
0.175
<0.1
0.125
<0.1
<0.1
0.12
<0.1
<0.1
0X8
Zn
56.4
15.75
4.05
2.8
2.05
68.3
1A
26.5
70
Ga
13,860
11,900
6,225
6,775
2,000
34,750
27,900
20,900
41,500
Fe
26,350
3,895
602.5
434.5
255
7,125
3,640
6,500
56,300
TOG
98,500
23,500
5,500
4,000
4,000
38,000
9,000
15,500
—
CD3 as C
75,500
39,500
14,000
6,000
5,500
70,500
107,500
44,500
—
TKN
2,320
623
118.5
83.75
54.55
1,088
284
580.5
—
TP
2,045
726
122
108.5
91.75
470
608
724.5
1,050
Specific Organ!C8
N)
H)
N>
tO
to
to
N)
N)
**
Note: N) = None detected.
*All values In ag/kg ~~ dry weight.
tLess than values averaged using cne-half the detection Unit.
**Handbock of Chemistry and thyslcs 1984.
-------
Specified Detection Limits for Organic Compounds Tested
for in Pensacola Bay, Florida Water Sediment and
Elutriate Samples Collected May 1986 (Page 1 of 2)
Water Sediment
(ug/1) (ug/kg)
PAHs
Acenaphthene <10 100
Acenapbtylene <10 100
Anthracene <10 100
Benzo(a)anthracene <10 100
Benzo(a)pyrene <10 100
Benzo(b)fluoranthene <10 100
Benzo(ghi)perylene <10 100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene <10 100
Chrysene <10 100
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene <10 100
Fluoranthene <10 100
Fluorene <10 100
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene <10 100
Naphthalene <10 100
Pheranthrene <10 100
Pyrene <10 100
Phenols
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <1.0 300
2-Chlorophenol <0.5 800
2,4-Dichlorophenol <0.5 300
2,4-Dlmethylphenol <0.5 300
2,4-Dinitrophenol <1.0 300
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol <1.0 300
2-Nitrophenol <0.5 300
4-Nitrophenol <1.0 300
Pentachlorophenol <1.0 300
Phenol <0.5 300
2,46-Trichlorophenol <1.0 300
D-8
-------
Specified Detection Llnlts for Organic Conpounds Tested
for In Pensacola Bay, Florida Vatar Sediment and
Elutriate Saoples Collected May 1986 (Page 2 of 2)
Uater
Sedleant
frg/i)
(ug/kg)
PCB-1016
0.5
200
PCB-1221
0.3
200
PCB-1232
0.5
200
PCB-1242
0.5
200
PCB-1248
0.5
200
PCB-1254
0.5
200
PCB-1260
0.5
200
Aldrln
0.01
20
Alpha-BHC
0.01
20
Beta-BHC
0.01
20
Delta-BHC
0.01
20
Gaooa-BHC
0.01
20
Chlordane
0.25
20
4,4'-DDD
0.25
20
4,4'-DDE
0.25
20
4,4'-DDT
0.25
20
Dleldrln
0.25
20
Endosulfan I
0.05
20
Endosulfan II
0.05
20
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.25
20
Endrln
0.25
20
Eadrln Aldehyde
0.25
20
Heptschlor
0.01
20
Heptschlor Epoxide
0.01
20
Toxaphene
0.25
200
D-9
-------
Summary Results of Filtered Site Water and Elutriate Samples Collected from Pensacola Bay, Florida
In Hay 1986
Station 1
Station 49
Average
Applicable
Parameter
Uater
Elutriate*
Uater
Elutriate*
Seawatert
Florida Criteriat
Alkalinity (mg/L CaCo3>
106
144
104
128
Carbonate (mg/L CaCo3>
ND
ND
ND
ND
—
—
TKN (mg/L)
<0.1
0.87
<0.1
0.5
—
' —
TP (mg/L)
<0.03
0.087
<0.03
<0.03
0.07
0.1
TOC (mg/L)
3
41
3
32
—
—
Ca (mg/L)
352
347
355
363
400
—
Al (ug/L)
1,230
1,010
1,790
1,450
10
1,500
Cd (ug/L)
0.09
0.08
0.31
0.38
0.11
5.0
Cr (ug/L)
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.05
50
Fe (ug/L)
<10
<10
<10
<10
10
300
Pb (ug/L)
<0.2
0.47
<0.2
0.6
0.03
50
Hg (ug/L)
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.03
0.1
Zn (ug/L)
21
37
16
18
10
1,000
Anthracene (ug/1)
<10
<10
<10
11
—
—
Pheranthrene (ug/1)
<10
<10
<10
<10
—
—
2-Methyl-4,6-
dlnltrophenol (ug/1)
<1.0
3.6
<1.0
<1.0
— —
4-Nltrophenol (ug/1)
2.7
1.1
<1.0
<1.0
—
Phenol (ug/1)
<0.5
1.5
<0.5
<0.5
1.0
*Average of three values.
tHandbook of Chemistry and Physics 1984.
Note: Values less than detectable are averaged using one-half the detection limit. All other PAHs, phenols,
PCBs, and chlorinated hydrocarbons tested were below the limit of detection,
specific compounds and their detection limits.
-------
TKN and TOG Results from Pensacola Bay Sediment Cores
Collected March 1986
Site
Depth Below
Sediment Surface
(feet)
TKN
(mg/kg)
TOC
(mg/kg)
TKN/TOC
Rat lo
10
8-12
1,800
17,000
0.11
SB
0-2
655
5,000
0.13
14
0-4
89.4
300
0.30
5B
5-8
1,510
24,000
0.06
15
6-9.5
957
12,000
0.08
2
0-2
690
10,000
0.069
19
0-8
8.36
1,000
0.01
49
3-6
1,700
26,000
0.06
17
4.5-6
961
18,000
0.05
49
0-3
1,630
36,000
0.04
8
0-2.5
79.6
1,000
0.08
1
5-8
2,070
27,000
0.08
8
3-4
54.8
600
0.09
3
6-9
2,350
29,000
0.08
15
0-5
8.48
400
0.02
3
0-3
2,410
32,000
0.08
17
0.5-3.5
162
2,000
0.08
1
0-5
884
25,000
0.04
14
4.5-6
1,600
30,000
0.05
2
2-5
2,200
23,000
0.10
10
0-4
35.2
200
0.18
6
1-3.5
15.9
800
0.02
6
0-1
2,040
28,000
0.07
6
5.5-7
575
17,000
0.03
D-ll
-------
APPENDIX D
Characteristics of Dredged Material
Effects of Sediment From Two Locations near the Pensacola,
Florida, Naval Air Station on Representative Marine Organisms
D-12
-------
EFFECTS OF SEDIMENT FROM TWO LOCATIONS NEAR THE PENSACOLA, FLORIDA,
NAVAL AIR STATION ON REPRESENTATIVE MARINE ORGANISMS
Prepared by:
Dredged Materials Research Team
P.R. Parrish, Coordinator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Research Laboratory
Sabine Island
Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561-3999
Submitted to:
Susan Ivester Rees, PD-EC
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
109 St. Joseph Street
Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001
In partial fulfillment of:
IAG RW96932347-01-1
Draft Report: May 1988
Final Report:
D-13
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — PENSACOLA
Sediment to be dredged from near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval
Air Station was subjected to biological and chemical testing in
compliance with Section 103 of Public Law 92-532. A 10-day test to
determine toxicity and bioaccumulation potential was conducted with
sediment from two locations and three representative marine
organisms; a 96-hour toxicity test was conducted with a sensitive
marine crustacean and the suspended particulate phase (SPP) of each
sample and the reference sediment. Chemical analyses were performed
on each sediment sample, the reference sediment, and tissues from
each type of test organism before and after the 10-day test.
The toxicity of the two sediment samples and reference sediment
was minimal. Exposure to the sediments for 10 days had little
observable adverse effect on lugworms (Arenicola cristata), oysters
(Crassostrea virqinical or pink shrimp (Penaeus duorarum).
Survival of lugworms was 90% in the reference sediment are 92% in
Site 1 and Site 2 sediment; oyster survival was 100% in the
reference sediment and in Site 1 and 2 sediment; shrimp survival was
98% in the reference sediment, 94% in Site 1 sediment, and 96% in
site 2 sediment. The SPP of the sediments had little effect on
mysids (Mvsidopsis bahia). Survival in 100% SPP of all samples was
100%.
No chemicals of interest were bioaccumulated sufficiently from
the two sediment samples to warrant concern. No pesticides or PCBs
were detected in sediments or animal tissues before or after the
10-day exposure but several metals and petroleum hydrocarbons were
D-14
-------
detected. However, the increase in concentrations in tissues of
lugworms, oysters, and shrimp was always < 3 times greater than
concentrations in animals exposed to the reference sediment and
appeared ecologically insignificant.
Based on the tests that we conducted, sediments to be dredged
from near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station were not toxic
nor were chemicals in them bioavailable for accumulation to
concentrations of concern.
D-15
-------
ABSTRACT
A toxicity and bioaccumulation test was conducted with sediment
from two locations near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station.
Three types of marine organisms from benthic and epibenthic habitats
were exposed to sediment samples from each of the two sites for 10
days in flowing, natural seawater; a reference sediment collected near
Gulf Breeze, Florida, was used as a control. The purpose of the test
was to evaluate, in the laboratory, the toxicity of the sediment
samples and the potential for bioaccumulation of chemicals from the
sediments. A 96-hour toxicity test was conducted with the suspended
particulate phase (SPP) of each sediment sample; the purpose was to
compare toxicity of the whole sediment to that of the SPP.
The toxicity of each of the three sediment samples was minimal.
Exposure to the sediments for 10 days had little observable adverse
effect on lugworms (Arenicola cristata), oysters (Crassostrea
virginica.) or pink shrimp (Penaeus duoraruml. Survival of lugworms
was 90% in the reference sediment and 92% in Site 1 and Site 2
sediment; oyster survival was 100% in the reference sediment and Site
1 and Site 2 sediment; and shrimp survival was 98% in the reference
sediment, 94% in Site 1 sediment and 96% in Site 2 sediment.
The SPP of the sediments had no adverse effect on mysids
(Mvsidopsis bahia). Survival in 100% SPP of the reference sediment and
Site 1 and Site 2 sediment was 100%.
The results of the bioaccumulation test are reported in a separate
document.
D-16
-------
INTRODUCTION
In accord with an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(CE), Mobile District, tests were conducted with sediment from two
locations near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station to determine
toxicity to representative marine organisms and the potential for
bioaccumulation of chemicals from the sediment samples. Ten-day tests
with the solid phase (whole sediment) and 96-hour (h) tests with the
suspended particulate phase (SPP) of each sediment sample and a
reference sediment were conducted at the U.S. EPA Environmental
Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze (ERLGB), Florida, in February 1988.
The chemical analyses of sediments and animal tissues also were
conducted at ERLGB, and the results are reported in a separate
document.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test Materials
The sediments to be tested were collected by ERLGB personnel on 8
February 1988, at two sites designated by CE, Mobile District
( Figure D-l ) . The reference sediment was collected the same day from
near Gulf Breeze, Florida. All samples were transported to ERLGB on
the day of collection and placed in a large cooler where temperature
was maintained at approximately 4°C. Before testing, all sediment
subsamples of each sediment were combined in a large container and
mixed well. A characterization of the two sediment samples and the
reference sediment is contained in Table 1.
Sodium lauryl sulfate was used as a reference toxicant to gauge
the condition of the test animals for the SPP tests. The chemical
D-17
-------
used was manufactured by Sigma Chemical Company, No. L-5750, Lot 42F-
0039, and was approximately 95% pure.
Test Animals
For the solid-phase (whole-sediment) tests, three types of marine
organisms from benthic and epibenthic habitats were tested. They were
lugworms (Arenicola cristata), oysters (Crassostrea vircrinica), and
pink shrimp fPenaeus duoraruml. The polychaetes were purchased from a
bait dealer in St. Petersburg, Florida; the oysters were collected from
East Bay, near ERLGB; and the shrimp were purchased from a local bait
dealer. All animals were maintained for at least 48 h at ERLGB where
they were acclimated to test conditions.
Mysids (Mvsidopsis bahial for the SPP and reference toxicant
tests were cultured at ERLGB. Mysids (5+1 days old) were fed
Artemia salina nauplii (32 to 48 h post-hydration) during holding
and testing.
Test Water
Natural seawater pumped from Santa Rosa Sound into the ERLGB
seawater system was used for all tests. For the solid-phase test, the
water was not filtered as it was pumped into elevated reservoirs.
There it was aerated and allowed to flow by gravity into the wet
laboratory, where it was siphoned from an open trough into the test
aquaria. For the SPP tests, the seawater was filtered through sand and
20-jum fiber filters; salinity was controlled at 20 ± 2 parts per
thousand by the addition of aged tap water, and temperature was
controlled at 25 + 1#C by a commercial chiller and/or heater.
D-18
-------
Test Methods
Test methods for the solid-phase tests were based on those of
U.S. EPA/Corps of Engineers (1977) and methods for the SPP test were
after U.S. EPA (1985). To prepare for the exposure of lugworms,
oysters, and shrimp, approximately 7 liters (1) of reference sediment
was placed in each of fifteen 20-gallon (76-1) glass aquaria. This
resulted in a layer of reference sediment approximately 30 millimeters
(mm) deep. After about 1 h, seawater flowed into each aquarium at
approximately 25 1/h, and the system was allowed to equilibrate for
24 h. Then, the seawater flow was stopped, approximately 3.5 1 of the
appropriate sediment was added to each aquarium (resulting in a layer
about 15 mm deep), the sediment was allowed to settle for approximately
1 h, and the seawater flow was resumed. Then 10 lugworms were placed
in the back section and 10 shrimp and 10 oysters were placed in the
front section of each aquarium. (A nylon screen, 2-mm mesh, had been
inserted in each aquarium and secured with silicone sealant in order to
separate the lugworms from the predacious shrimp.) Ten test organisms
per replicate of each species were used for this test because this ,
number was sufficient to perform a statistical analysis of mortality
and the individuals were of such a size that sufficient biomass was
available for chemical analyses to determine bioaccumulation.
The five control (reference sediment) aquaria were prepared at
the same time and in the same manner as the sediment exposure aquaria
except that only the reference sediment was added to each aquarium.
The 10-day solid-phase test was conducted from 16 to 26 February
1988. Water temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen were
D-19
-------
recorded daily. Dead animals were noted and removed from the aquaria
daily. At the end of the exposure, the remaining live animals in each
aquarium were removed, rinsed with seawater to remove sediment, and
were placed separately in flowing seawater to purge their gut. After
24 h, they were placed in acid-cleaned glass jars, then frozen, and
later provided to the ERLGB Chemistry Laboratory for chemical analyses
to determine bioaccumulation. Animals from the test populations were
treated similarly before the test began to provide information on
background concentrations.
To prepare the suspended particulate phase (SPP) of the two
sediments and the reference sediment, 1,000 milliliters (ml) of chilled
seawater was added to a 2-1 Erlenmeyer flask. Then, 200 ml of well-
stirred sediment was added to the flask. More seawater (800 ml) was
added to the flask to bring the contents to the 2-1 mark. This 1-
part sediment:9-part seawater mixture was placed on a magnetic stirrer
and mixed for at least 5 minutes (min), and then allowed the settle for
1 h. The SPP was then decanted into a separate container, and pH and
dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations were measured. The SPP of the
reference sediment had to be aerated to increase the DO to acceptable
concentrations (> 60% of saturation). The appropriate volume of 100%
SPP in seawater of seawater only was added to 2-1 Carolina culture
dishes (the total volume in each dish was 11) to prepare the test
mixtures and control. The mixtures were than stirred for approximately
5 min; the DO, pH, temperature and salinity were measured; and test
animals were added to the dishes.
After water quality measurements and addition of animals, the
D-20
-------
dishes were stacked, with a cover on the top dish, and placed in an
incubator. The temperature controller was set at 20*C and the light
controller at 14 h light:10 h dark. The seawater in all treatments was
aerated at a volume estimated to be 100 cubic centimeters/min during
the tests.
Water quality was measured at 24-h intervals, and daily counts of
live animals were made. After 96 h, the number of live animals was
determined and the tests were terminated.
Tests with the SPP prepared from the sediments were conducted 22
to 26 February 1988; a reference toxicant test with mysids from the
same population was conducted at the same time.
Statistical Analyses
There was no statistical analyses of the data from the solid-phase
tests or the SPP tests because no median effect (50% mortality)
occurred. Mortality data from the mysid reference toxicant test were
subjected to statistical analyses, however. The 96-h LC50 (the
concentration lethal to 50% of the test animals after 96 h of
exposure) was calculated by using the moving average method (Stephan,
1977). The 95% confidence limits were also calculated.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sediment from two sites near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air
Station had little observable adverse effects on lugworms, oysters, or
pink shrimp after a 10-day exposure. Survival of lugworms was 90% in
the reference sediment and 92% in Site 1 and Site 2 sediment; oyster
survival was 100% in the reference sediment and in Site 1 and Site 2
sediment; and shrimp survival was 98% in the reference sediment, 94% in
D-21
-------
Site l sediment, and 96% in Site 2 sediment (Table 2).
The suspended particulate phase (SPP) of the sediments did not
cause any adverse effects on mysids. When up to 100% SPP was tested,
survival was 100% (Table 3).
i
Results of the reference toxicant test showed that the mysids were
in suitable condition for testing; the 96-h LC50 was 6.3 ppm with 95%
confidence limits of 4.8 to 8.4 ppm. Our experience and the literature
(Roberts et al., 1982) show that the 96-h LC50 of sodium lauryl sulfate
for mysids is usually 5 to 8 ppm.
D-22
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Folk, R.L. 1957. Petrology q£ sedimentary Rock. Hemphill
Publishing Co. Austin, TX, pp. 123-145.
Roberts, M.H. Jr., J.E. Warinner, F. Tsai, D. Wright, and L.E. Cronin.
1982. Comparison of Estuarine Species Sensitivity to Three
Toxicants. Archives of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology, 11:681-692.
Stephan, C.E. 1977. Methods for Calculating an LC50. In: Aquatic
Toyjgj-ty and Hazard Evaluation. ASTM STP 634, F.L. Mayer and J.L.
Hamelink, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, PA, pp. 65-84.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Corps of Engineers. 1977.
Ecological Evaluation of Proposed Discharge of Dredged Material
into Ocean Waters, Implementation Manual for Section 103 of Public
Law 92-532 (Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of
1972), U.S. Army engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,
MS, 24 pp. plus appendices.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1985. Oil and Gas Point
Source Category, Offshore Subcategory; Effluent Limitations
Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards; Proposed Rule.
FEDERAL REGISTER 50(165):34592-34636.
D-23
-------
Table 1. Characterization of two sediment samples from near the
Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station and a reference sediment from
near Gulf Breeze, Florida, for water content, silt-clay (< 62
micrometers), and organic carbon (Folk, 1957). Values reported are
means.
Sediment
Water m
Silt-Clav (%1
Organic Carbon f%l
Reference
64.5
45.0
6.2
Site 1
48.3
19.3
4.5
Site 2 .
22.8
0
0.5
D-24
-------
Table 2. Results of a 10-day laboratory exposure of lugworms
(&E£niS2la cristatal, oysters (Crassostrea yjlrginAcfl), and pink shrimp
(Penaeus duorarunl to sediment from near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval
Air Station, along with a reference sediment from near Gulf Breeze,
Florida. Numbers of animals that were alive at the end of the
exposure are given; numbers of animals per replicate at the beginning
of the test were 10 lugworms, oysters, and pink shrimp.
ReDlicate
Lucrworms
Ovsters
Shrimp
1
9
10
10
2
9
10
10
Reference
3
9
10
10
Sediment
4
9
10
10
5
9
10
9
Total
45
50
49
1
8
10
10
2
10
10
10
Site l
3
10
10
8
4
9
10
10
5
9
10
9
Total
46
50
47
1
10
10
10
2
10
10
10
Site 2
3
9
10
9
4
9
10
9
5
8
10
10
Total
46
50
48
D-25
-------
Table 3. Results of acute toxicity tests conducted with mysids
(Mvsidopsis bahia) and the suspended particulate phase (SPP) of
sediment from two sites near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station
and a reference sediment from near Gulf Breeze, Florida. The
percentage of animals alive after 96 hours of exposure is given.
Exposure Concentration (% SPPal
Test material Control 1% 10% 25% 50% 100%
Reference 100 90 100 80 100 100
Sediment
Site 1 90 100 90 90 100 100
Site 2 100 100 100 100 100 100
a The SPP (suspended particulate phase) was prepared by mixing 1 part
sediment with 9 parts seawater (v:v), allowing the mixture to settle
for 1 h, and decanting the unsettled portion.
D-26
-------
Temperature, salinity, and dissolved Oxygen measurements during a 10—day
lauu^Luiy exposure of marine organisms to sediments from near the Pensacola,
Florida, Naval Air Station and a reference sediment from near Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Table 4.
laboratory
Test dav
—3_ _4_ _5_ _6_ _7_ _JL_ _JL_ 10
Temp. (*C) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.5 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.0 20.0
Salinity 25.0 26.0 25.0 21.0 16.0 20.0 21.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
(/oo)
DO (PPml
Reference
Sediment
Rep. 1 6.8 7.2 6.6 6.5 8.0 7.9
2 3.8 6.7 5.2 6.3 7.7 5.2
3 4.1 7.0 6.6 6.9 8.0 7.8
4 2.5 6.9 6.6 6.5 8.0 5.5
5 4.8 6.9 7.0 6.8 8.1 7.8
Site 1
Rep* I 1*2 I*? §•§ I'l 5-1 8-1 7-8 7.9 7.9 7.7
2 I'} £•! Z-? 2*2 7*9 7-8 7-7 8-o 7.8
2 £*2 lm A f-f 7-i 7-8 8.1 7.6 7.6 5.9 7.8
1 I'l 1*2 f *2 7.0 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.7
5 3.8 6.9 5.0 6.0 7.8 7.7 7.1 7.5 7.5 7.6
Site 2
Rep. 1 6.9 7.1 7.0 7.4 8.1 7.9 7.7 7.8 8.0 7.8
2 4.9 6.7 5.3 6.4 7.6 7.7 7.5 6ll 7 8 7^7
3 5.8 6.5 5.5 5.5 7.4 7.6 7.1 ^7 7.7 7.6
4 5.2 6.7 6.5 6.8 7.9 7.8 7.4 6.1 7.7 7.6
5 6.7 7.1 5.5 7.2 8.1 7.9 7.4 7.9 7.9 7.9
8.0
7.4
7.8
7.8
6.7
5.8
5.6
4.0
7.9
7.6
7.1
7.5
6.7
6.7
6.8
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.7
-------
Table 5. pH measurements during a 10 day laboratory exposure of marine orqanisms
to sediments from near the Pensacola. Florida, Naval Air Station and a reference
sediment from near Gulf Breeze, Florida.
Test dav
-BIL
8 9 10
Reference
Sediment
ReP- J 8-00 8.06 8.07 8.05 8.06 7.96 7.99 8.06 8.05 8.04
2 f.14 7.98 8.06 8.06 8.06 8.03 8.02 8.04 8.04 8.03
3 8 • 15 8.04 8.06 8.06 8.07 7.96 8.01 8.04 8.06 8.04
4 8.02 8.05 8.07 8.06 8.06 8.04 8.09 8.07 8.03
5 8.13 8.07 8.10 8.09 8.09 7.98 8.04 8.06 8.10 8.09
Site 1
ReP- 1 8.18 8.06 8.09 7.98 8.07 7.99 8.05 8.08 8.08 8.06
2 8.07 8.07 8.10 8.03 8.08 7.99 8.05 8.06 8.09 8.07
? 8.05 f.09 8.12 7.99 8.08 8.04 8.04 8.06 8.07 8.07
i 8.10 8.13 8.03 8.07 8.03 8.05 8.06 8.07 8.08
5 8.11 8.09 8.11 8.03 8.09 8.03 8.03 8.08 8.09 8.05
Site 2
ReP- J 8.05 8.08 8.11 8.01 8.07 7.97 8.03 8.08 8.09 8.06
\ n'%\ o*n? i*34 1*21 1*81 2*92 8*06 8.09 8.09 8.07
? 2*22 2*22 8,14 8-08 8.06 7.97 8.03 8.08 8.09 8.03
i f*2£ 2*9$ 8.08 8.02 8.06 7.89 8.04 8.06 8.08 8.03
5 8.06 8.10 8.17 8.03 8.08 8.00 8.06 8.08 8.10 8.09
-------
•rv
ft wwoCOM/nxm itatiqm
Fipure D-l
p|MMOU'
-------
APPENDIX D
Characteristic of Dredged Material
Chemical Analyses of Sediment from Two Sites near the
Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station and Tissues of
Marine Organisms Exposed to the Sediment
D-30
-------
CHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SEDIMENT FROM TWO SITES NEAR THE PENSACOLA,
FLORIDA, NAVAL AIR STATION AND
TISSUES OF MARINE ORGANISMS EXPOSED TO THE SEDIMENT
Prepared by:
Analytical chemistry Section of
The Aquatic Toxicology Branch
James C. Moore, Section Chief
E.M. Lores, Research Chemist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Research Laboratory
Sabine Island
Gulf Breeze, FL 32561
Submitted To:
Susan Ivester Rees, PD-EC
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
109 St. Joseph Street
Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001
In partial fulfillment of:
Draft Report: May 1988
Final Report:
D-31
-------
ABSTRACT
Chemical analyses were performed on sediments from two sites
near the Pensacola, Florida, Naval Air Station and on three types
of marine organisms exposed to these sediment samples during a 10-
day bioaccumulation test conducted by the Dredged Materials Research
Team of the Gulf Breeze Laboratory. Five replicates of each sedi-
ment and type of organism were analyzed for residues of selected
chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides, PCBs, chlorpyrifos (Dursban),
petroleum hydrocarbons, and nine heavy metals. The purpose of these
chemical analyses was to determine if residues were detectable in
the sediments and if chemicals accumulated in tissues of organisms
exposed to the sediments. Two replicate samples of each type of
organism and sediment were analyzed before use in the bioaccumu-
lation test.
Residues of selected pesticides or PCBs were not detected in
sediments or animal tissues before or after exposure but several
metals were detected in sediments and in tissues of organisms before
and after exposure. Concentrations of cadmium and nickel in
oysters (Crassostrea virqinica) and lugworms (Arenicola cristata)
exposed to sediment from site 2 were statistically greater than
concentrations of metals in animals exposed to the reference
sediment. Concentrations of arsenic, copper and zinc were
statistically greater in oysters exposed to sediment from Site 1 and
in oysters exposed to sediment from Site 2 than those exposed to the
reference sediment. No statistically significant differences were
D-32
-------
determined for metals in shrimp (Panaeus duorarum). When
differences between mean values for organisms exposed to the
reference sediment and mean values for organisms exposed to a test
site are not greater than an order of magnitude, this difference
may not indicate a bioaccumulation potential without further
confirmation by a more definitive study. Aliphatic and aromatic
petroleum hydrocarbon residues were found in oysters, shrimp and
lugworms after the 10-day exposure study; however no statistically
significant differences could be determined.
D-33
-------
INTRODUCTION
In accord with an agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (CE), Mobile District, and EPA's Gulf Breeze Environmental
Research Laboratory (ERL/GB), chemical analyses were performed on
sediment collected from two locations near the Pensacola, FL, Naval
Air Station and on three species (shrimp, oyster, and lugworm) of
marine organisms exposed to these sediments during a 10-day
bioaccumulation test. Five replicates of each sediment and organism
were analyzed for the following chemical residues: PCBs, selected
chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides, chlorpyrifos (Dursban), selected
heavy metals, and two petroleum hydrocarbon fractions (aliphatic and
aromatic). These analyses were performed on sediments and organisms
before the bioaccumulation test and on organisms after the
bioaccumulation test. Chemical analyses were performed by gas-
liquid chromatography for pesticides, PCBs, and petroleum
hydrocarbons, and inductively coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy (ICAP) for heavy metals. Methods of chemical analyses
were modified and validated at ERL/GB, except for the petroleum
hydrocarbon method. This method was used as recommended by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers Implementation Manual (EPA/CE, 1977).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Test Sediments and Animals
Samples of sediments and test organisms were obtained from the
ERL/GB Dredged Materials Research Team prior to initiation of the
bioaccumulation test. After the 10-day exposure period, five
D-34
-------
replicates of each test organism from each test sediment, and the
reference sediment, were collected and maintained at - 4°C until
chemical analyses were performed.
Methods of Chemical analyses
A. Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides and PCBs
Tissue samples were weighed into a 150-mm by 25-mm screw top
test tube and homogenized three times with 10 ml of acetonitrile
with a Willems Polytron Model PT 20-ST (Brinkman Instruments,
Westbury, NY). Following each homogenization, the test tube was
centrifuged (1600x g) and the liquid layer decanted into a 120-ml
oil sample bottle. Seventy-five ml of a 2% (w/v) aqueous sodium
sulfate and 10 ml of petroleum ether were added to the bottle and
the contents shaken for 1 minute. After the layers separated, the
solvent was pipetted into a 25-ml concentrator tube and the
extraction with petroleum ether was repeated two more times. The
combined solvent extract was concentrated to 1 ml on a nitrogen
evaporator in preparation for cleanup.
Cleanup columns were prepared by adding 3 g of PR-grade
florisil (stored at 130°C) and 2 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate
(powder) to a 200-mm by 9-mm i.d. Chromaflex column (Kontes Glass
Co., Vineland, NJ) and rinsing with 20 ml of hexane. Tissue and
sediment extracts were transferred to the column with two additional
2-ml volumes of hexane. Pesticides and PCBs were eluted with 20 ml
of 5% (v/v) diethyl ether in hexane.
Quantitations of pesticides were made with external standard
methods. All standards were obtained from the EPA pesticide
D-35
-------
repository. PCB reference standard, obtained from U.S. EPA Chemical
Repository, Washington, DC, was described by Sawyer (1978).
Analyses were performed on a Hewlett-Packard Model 5710 gas
6 3
chromatograph equipped with a Ni electron-capture detector.
Separations were performed by using a 182-cm by 2-mm i.d. glass
column packed with 2% SP2100 (Supleco, INc., Bellefonte, PA) on 80-
100 mesh Supelcoport. Other gas chromatographic parameters were:
flow rate of the 10% methane-in-argon carrier gas, 25 ml/min; column
temperature, 190"C; inlet temperature, 200°C, and detector
temperature, 300°C.
Recoveries of PCBs and pesticides from spiked samples and
detection limits for pesticides and petroleum hydrocarbons are shown
in Table 1.
B. Heavy Metals
One to two grams of tissue or sediment were weighed into a 40
ml reaction vessel. Five ml of concentrated nitric acid (Baker
Chemical Instra-Analyzed) were added and the samples digested for 2
to 4 h at 70"C in a tube heater. Digestion was continued, with
vessels caped, for 48 h at 70°C. After digestion, samples were
transferred to 15-ml tubes and diluted to 10 ml for aspiration into
a Jarrell-Ash AtomComp 800 Series inductively-coupled argon-plasma
emission spectrometer(ICP). This instrument acquires data for 15
elements simultaneously. Method detection limits for each element
are given in Table 7 and are based on wet weight analyses. No
detectable residues could be found in method blanks. A solution of
ten percent nitric acid/distilled water was analyzed between samples
D-36
-------
to prevent carryover of residues from one sample to the next.
Standards were used to calibrate the instrument initially and
adjustments were made when necessary. Concentrations are reported
in two significant figures as our method allows, and were not
corrected for percentage recovery.
C. Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Ten grams of tissue or sediment were weighed into culture
tubes and extracted as described by J.S. Warner (1976). Sample
extracts were concentrated to approximately 0.50 ml for gas
chromatographic analyses. Analyses were performed on a Hewlett
Packard gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with flame ionization
detection (FID). Separations were performed by using a 182-cm by 2-
mm i.d. glass column packed with 3% OV101 on 100/120 mesh
Supelcoport. Helium carrier gas was used at a flow of 30 ml/min.
Quality Assurance of Chemical Analyses
All standards used for quantitations of pesticides were
obtained from EPA's repository in Las Vegas, Nevada. Standard
solutions of metals were obtained from J.T. Baker Chemical Co.,
Phillipsburg, NJ, and were Instra-Analyzed quality. Dotriacontane
was obtained from Alltech Associates, Deerfield, Illinois, and was
used as an internal standard to quantitate petroleum hydrocarbons.
A part of our quality assurance procedures includes
fortification (spiking) of samples of organisms and sediments with
selected chemicals to evaluate the entire analytical system during
the period of time quantitative analyses of test organisms and
sediments are performed. Separate samples were fortified with
D-37
-------
selected pesticides and petroleum hydrocarbons (Table 1), and metals
(Table 7). Reagent and glassware blanks were analyzed to verify
that the analytical system was not contaminated with chemical
residues that could interfere with quantitations.
Statistical Analyses
Residue data were analyzed according to guidance in the
Implementation Manual (EPA/CE, 1977). After calculations were
performed to determine whether variance of data sets were
homogeneous, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean
tissue concentration in animals exposed to each dredged material
sediment sample with mean tissue concentrations in animals exposed
to reference sediment. Nondetectable (ND) concentrations were
treated as missing values when analysis of variance procedures were
performed. When the calculated F-value exceeded the tabulated
value, Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-range test was used to
determine which dredged material mean tissue concentration was
significantly different from the reference mean tissue
concentration. These analyses were performed by using Statistical
Analysis System (SAS) procedures (SAS Institute Inc.).
D-38
-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analyses of Pesticides and PCBs
During these analyses, only oysters were available in
sufficient numbers to allow them to be used for spiking. However,
we believe that the results of spiked samples (Table 1) indicate
that the extraction and quantitation techniques were adequate for
determining concentrations of chemical residues in organisms and
sediments used in the bioaccumulation study. Results of reagent and
glassware blank analyses verified that residues of pesticides, PCBs,
petroleum hydrocarbons, metals, or other contaminants were not
present prior to the analyses of test organisms and sediments.
Before the bioaccumulation test, chemical analyses were
performed on samples of each group of organisms and sediments.
Results indicated that residues of pesticides and PCBs were not
present in concentrations above the detection limits. Residues of
pesticides or PCBs were not detected in replicate samples of the
reference sediment or sediment from Sites 1 and 2 (Table 2).
Detection limits were the same as those in Table 1.
After organisms were exposed to the reference sediment or Site
1 or 2 sediments for 10 days, they were analyzed for pesticides and
PCBs. Pesticides or PCBs did not accumulate in any of the
organisms exposed to the reference sediment (Table 3) or to sediment
from Sites 1 or 2 (Tables 4 and 5, respectively).
Analyses of Metals
Replicate samples of each group of organisms and sediment were
analyzed for selected metals before the bioaccumulation test and
D-39
-------
replicate samples of each organism were analyzed after the 10-day
bioaccumulation test. Metals detected in pretest animals are shown
in Table 6, along with method detection limit for each element.
Metals detected in sediments are shown in Table 7. Reagent blanks
for metals were analyzed at regular intervals with no residues
detected.
Concentrations of metals in replicate samples of oysters
exposed for 10 days to the reference sediment or Site 1 and 2
sediment are shown in Table 8. Test for homogeneity of variances on
concentrations of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), selenium
(Se), and zinc (Zn) (Tables 9 through 14) showed that transformation
of these data was not necessary. Analysis of variance of arsenic,
cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel and zinc concentrations (Tables 15
through 20) showed that significant differences were detected for
these metals at the 0.050 alpha level except for nickel and
chromium. However, due to insufficient number of detectable
quantities of chromium, analysis of variance should not be used as
the definitive statistical analysis in this particular case. It may
not fit the assumption used in analysis of variance procedures. An
alternative statistical analysis is suggested.
A Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-range-test was then performed
to compare treatment mean concentrations and determine if metals in
animals exposed to Site 1 and 2 sediment were different from those
exposed to the reference sediment. Results of these analyses
(Tables 21 through 24) showed that both Sites 1 and 2 were
different from the reference sediment for arsenic, copper, and zinc,
D-40
-------
and only Site 2 was different from the reference sediment for
cadmium.
Concentrations of metals in replicate samples of lugworms
exposed for 10 days to the reference sediment or Site 1 or 2 are
shown in Table 25. Results of tests for homogeneity of variance
(Tables 26 through 30) indicated that variances for all metals
except chromium were homogenous. Results from analyses of variance
tests for arsenic, chromium, and nickel (Tables 31 through 33)
indicated that nickel was the only metal with significant
differences at the 0.05 alpha level. A Student-Newman-Keuls
multiple range test (Table 34) showed that the mean concentration
of nickel in lugworms exposed to sediment from Site 2 was
statistically different from the mean concentration in lugworms
exposed to the reference sediment.
Concentrations of metals in replicate samples of shrimp
exposed for 10 days to the reference sediment or Site 1 or 2
sediment are shown in Table 35. Test for homogeneity of variances
(Tables 36 through 41) indicated that log transformation was
necessary for arsenic data. Because of similarity of means or
because means from the sites were less than means for the reference
sediment, no further analyses were necessary for cadmium and copper.
Since no detectable concentration of lead was found in shrimp
exposed to the reference sediment, no further analyses were
performed. No statistically significant differences could be found
for arsenic, chromium, or zinc using ANOVA (Tables 42 through 44).
Analyses of petroleum hydrocarbons
D-41
-------
Results from samples of organisms and sediments that were
analyzed for residues of both aliphatic and aromatic petroleum
hydrocarbons before and after the 10-day bioaccumulation test are
shown in Table 45. Pre-test animals contained detectable
concentrations of these residues; however, only lugworms and oysters
contained both aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons fractions. The
reference sediment contained higher concentrations of both
aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons than did Site 1 sediment.
Sediment from Site 2 did not contain detectable residues of either
fraction.
Shrimp exposed to the reference sediment for 10 days did not
contain consistently detectable concentrations of either aliphatic
or aromatic petroleum hydrocarbons for statistical comparisons
(Table 45). Many samples of shrimp and oysters (Table 46 and 47) or
lugworms (Table 48) did not contain detectable residues. Therefore,
statistical analyses could not be performed for aromatic hydrocarbon
accumulation in these organisms. Analysis of variance tests for
aliphatic hydrocarbon residues did not reveal significant
differences in oysters (Table 49) or lugworms (Table 50).
D-42
-------
LITERATURE CITED
SAS Users Guide: Basic, 1982 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
923 pp.
Sawyer, L.D. 1978. Quantitation of Polychlorinated Biphenyl
Residues by Electron Capture Gas-Liquid chromatography:
collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 61, 1282-291.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/Corps of Engineers. 1977.
Technical Committee on Criteria for Dredged and Fill Material,
"Ecological Evaluation of Proposed Discharge of Dredged
Material Into Ocean Waters; Implementation Manual for Section
103 Public Law 92-532 (Marine Protection Research,and
Sanctuaries Act of 1972), "July 1977 (second Printing April
1978), Environmental Effects Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineers
Waterways Experimentation Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Warner, J.S. 1976. Determination of Aliphatic and ARomatic
Hydrocarbons in Marine Organisms. Analytical Chemistry, 48,
No. 3, 578-583.
D-43
-------
Table 1. Percentage recovery of chlorinated hydr< irbon pesticides, and petroleum hydrocarbons
spiked in tissues of organisms and reference sediment used in a bioaccumulation study
with sediments from Pensacola, FL. Method detection limit for each compound is given
in jLtg/g wet tissue weight. Standard deviation is shown in parentheses.
Compound
Spike
Concentration
(Mg/g)
Lugworm Shrimp
N
Oyster
N Sediment
Method
Detection
Limit
(Mg/g)
Aldrin
0.010
a
a
17
83
(6.7)
3
71
(24)
0.0020
BHC Isomers
Alpha
0.0050
a
a
a
a
0.00080
Beta
0.010
a
a
a
a
0.0040
Gamma (lindane)
0.010
a
a
17
90
(7.7)
3
74
(13)
0.0020
Delta
0.020
a
a
a
a
0.0020
Chlordane
0.10
a
a
a
a
0.040
Chlorpyrifos (Dursban)
0.10
a
a
17
96
(12)
4
90
(1.3)
0.010
DDE
0.020
a
a
17
79
(14)
4
103
(15)
0.0040
DDD
0.040
a
a
17
88
(6.0)
4
90
(14)
0.0080
DDT
0.060
a
a
17
82
(7.3)
4
90
(8.3)
0.010
Dieldrin
0.020
a
a
17
95
(8.9)
4
79
(2.5)
0.0040
Endrin
0.020
a
a
17
96
(11)
4
70
(4.0)
0.010
Endosulfan I
0.020
a
a
a
a
0.010
Endosulfan II
0.020
a
a
a
a
0.010
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.10
a
a
a
a
0.050
Heptachlor
0.010
a
a
17
69
(13)
a
0.0020
Heptachlor epoxide
0.010
a
a
17
88
(13)
3
41
(27)
0.010
Hexachlorobenz ene
0.050
a
a
a
a
0.0020
Methoxychlor
0.10
a
a
17
88
(7)
a
0.030
Mirex
0.10
a
a
17
84
(8.6)
a
0.020
PCBs
0.50
a
a
a
a
0.10
Toxaphene
1.0
a
a
a
a
0.20
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Aliphataic
1.0-5.0
58
(36)
0.50
Aromatic
1.0-1.5
1
74
0.50
a Analytes were not spiked for recovery.
-------
Table 2. Concentrations of selected chlorinated pesticides and PCBs in replicate
samples of three marine organisms analyzed prior to a bioaccuraulation
study with sediments from Pensacola, FL.
ReDlicate
Lucrworm
ShrimD
Ovster
1
2
1
2
1
2
Aldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BHC Isomers
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Alpha
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Beta
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Gamma (1indane)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Delta
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlordane
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlorpyrifos (Dursban)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ODE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dieldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan II
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan Sulfate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Methoxychlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mirex
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCBs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Toxaphene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected; see Table 1 for detection limits.
-------
Table 3. Concentrations of selected chlorinated pesticides and PCBs in replicate samples of
three marine organisms analyzed after a 10- day exposure to a reference sediment
from Pensacola, FL.
Luqworm Shrimp Ovster
Replicate 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Aldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BHC Isomers
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Alpha
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Beta
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Gamma (lindane)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlordane
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlorpyrifos (Dursban)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dieldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan II
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan Sulfate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Methoxychlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mirex
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCBs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Toxaphene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected, see Table 1 for detection limits.
-------
Table 4. Concentrations of selected chlorinated pesticides and PCBs in replicate samples of
three marine organisms analyzed after a 10-day exposure to Site 1 sediment from
Pensacola, FL.
Ret)licate
Lucrworm
ShrimD
Ovster
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Aldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BHC Isomers
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Alpha
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Beta
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Gamma (lindane)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlordane
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlorpyrifos (Dursban)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dieldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan II
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan Sulfate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Methoxychlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mirex
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCBs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Toxaphene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected, see Table 1 for detection limits.
-------
Table 5. Concentrations of selected chlorinated pesticides and PCBs in replicate samples of
three marine organisms analyzed after a 10-day exposure to Site 2 sediment from
Pensacola, FL.
Luaworm Shrimp Ovster
Replicate 12345 12345 12345
Aldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
BHC Isomers
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Alpha
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Beta
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Gamma (lindane)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlordane
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chlorpyrifos (Dursban)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dieldrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endrin
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan II
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Endosulfan Sulfate
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Methoxychlor
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mirex
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PCBs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Toxaphene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected, see Table 1 for detection limits.
-------
Table 6. Concentrations of selected metals in tissues of organisms that were determined
as background residues before the organisms were used in a bioaccumulation study
with Pensacola sediment. Method detection limits for each element is given in
Mg/g wet tissue weight.
Pre-Test Concentrations in ua/a wet tissue weight
Oraanism
ReDlicate
Asa
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg_
Ni
Pba
Se
Zn
Shrimp
1
6.0
0.27
0.39
5.0
b
0.34
ND
ND
19
2
9.8
0.24
0.57
5.3
ND
ND
2.5
ND
18
Lugworm
1
6.3
ND
ND
3.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
8
2
5.0
ND
ND
4.2
1.4
ND
ND
ND
12
Oyster
1
7.1
0.25
0.25
6.1
0.77
0.29
ND
ND
160
2
5.3
0.23
0.27
6.4
ND
0.29
ND
ND
170
Method Detection Limits0
0.375 0.125 0.25 0.15 0.625 0.25 0.50 0.375 0.125
a Background subtraction techniques normally used could not be applied
due to interference from unknown elements that cause intense background
signal. Therefore, arsenic and lead values are reported as maximum possible
concentrations.
b Sample was contaminated by residues from standard that was analyzed
immediately before this sample.
c Based on final volume of 50 ml and a sample weight of 2 g (maximum sample
size).
ND = Not detected
-------
Table 7. Concentrations of selected metals in the reference sediment and Sites 1 and
2, near Pensacola, FL.
Sediment Concentrations in ua/a wet tissue weight
Location
Replicate
Asp
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg_
Ni
PbD
Se
Zn
Reference
1
2
2.2
ND
9.5
ND
ND
o
• |
3.1
ND
1
Site 1
1
14
ND
15
2.9
ND
6.1
11
ND
66
2
3.6
ND
16
4.4
ND
5.8
7.6
ND
106
Site 2
1
28
ND
26
6.6
ND
9.4
13
ND
50
2
1.2
ND
9.2
1.2
ND
3.4
ND
ND
51
ND = not detected; see Table 7 for detection limits.
a Interference from other metals prevented accurate quantitation.
k Usual background correction techniques could not be applied because
of the intense interference; therefore, without subtracting
background, lead and arsenic may be present but not in quantities
greater than these shown.
-------
Table 8. Concentrations of selected metals in samples of oysters from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study with the reference sediment from test sites 1 and
2, Pensacola, FL.
Sediment Concentrations in uq/g wet weight
Location
Replicate
Asa
Cd
Cr
Cu
m
Ni
Pb
Se
Zn
Reference
1
2.2
0.37
0.26
6.2
1.0
0.56
ND
ND
175
2
2 . 3
0.38
0.19
5.8
ND
0.51
ND
ND
165
3
1.8
0.21
0.15
3.4
0.76
ND
ND
ND
97
4
2.4
0.20
ND
3.9
ND
0.33
ND
ND
117
5
2 . 4
0.20
ND
3 . 7
ND
1.2
ND
ND
108
Site 1
1
2 . 5
0.26
0.14
5.3
ND
0.40
ND
ND
170
2
3.0
0.35
0.14
8.0
ND
0.35
ND
ND
260
3
2.8
0.35
ND
8.4
ND
0.51
ND
ND
270
4
3 .1
0.45
0.21
6.9
ND
0.45
ND
ND
220
5
3.3
0.47
0.29
8.7
ND
0.62
ND
ND
250
Site 2
1
4.0
0.59
0.63
14
ND
0.59
ND
ND
390
2
3.4
0.53
0.63
11
ND
0.49
ND
ND
310
3
3.7
0.51
0.24
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
330
4
3.0
0.52
0.24
7.9
ND
0.60
ND
ND
250
5
4.3
0.80
0.45
13
ND
1.2
ND
ND
350
ND = not detected
a Background subtraction techniques normally used could not be applied
due to interference from unknown elements that cause intense background
signal. Therefore, arsenic and lead values are reported as maximum possible
concentrations.
-------
Table 9. Statistical analysis of arsenic (jug/ . wet tissue) in samples of
oysters from the 10-day bioaccumulation, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
Sites
1
2
3
4
5
Sum of data, Ex =
2.2
2.3
1.8
2.4
2.4
11.1
2.5
3.0
2.8
3.1
3.3
14.7
4.0
3.4
3.7
3.0
4.3
18.4
Mean X =
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
2.22
24.89
2.94
43.59
3.68
68.74
CSS = Ex - fEX)2 =
n
Variance =
0.248
0.062
0.372
0.093
1.028
0.257
C = 0.257 = 0.623 where C = S2max: (S2max = largest variance)
0.412 ES2 (ES2 = sum of all variances)
Chi square (4,4) = 0.6287
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, variances are homogeneous and
transformation is unnecessary.
-------
Table 10. Statistical analysis of cadmium (ng, vet tissue) in samples of oysters from
the 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
Sites
1
2
3
4
5
Sum of data, Ex =
Mean X =
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
CSS = Ex2 - 1EX12 =
n
Variance =
0.37
0.38
0.21
0.20
0.20
1.36
0.272
0.405
0.0355
0.0089
0.26
0. 35
0. 35
0.45
0.47
1.88
0.376
0.736
0.0291
0.0073
0.59
0.53
0.51
0.52
0.80
2.95
0.590
1.799
0.0590
0.0148
C = 0.0148 = 0.477; see Table 9 for equation.
1.779
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than the tabulated Chi square value, variances are homogeneous
and transformation is unnecessary.
-------
Table 11. statistical analysis of chromium (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of oysters from
from the 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
1
0.26
ND
0.63
2
ND
ND
0.63
3
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
0.29
0.45
Sum of data, Ex =
0.26
0.29
1.71
Mean X =
0.26
0.29
0.57
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
0
0
0.0063
CSS = Ex2 - (T.X)2 =
9
•
0.0216
n
Variance =
•
•
0.0108
No further statistical calculations performed due to insufficient numbers of
detectable data values.
-------
Table 12. Statistical analysis of copper fig/g wet tissue) in samples of oysters from
the 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
1
6.2
5.3
14
2
5.8
8 . 0
11
3
3.4
8.4
11
4
3.9
6.9
7.9
5
3.7
8.7
13
Sum of data, Ex =
23.0
37. 3
56.9
Mean X =
4.60
7.46
11.38
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
112.54
285.95
669.41
CSS = EX2 - (EX)2 =
6.74
7.69
21.88
n
Variance =
1.685
1.923
5.472
C = 5.472 = 0.6026; see Table 9 for equation.
9.08
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, variances are
homogeneous and transformation is unnecessary.
-------
Table 13. Statistical analysis of nickel (jLig/g wet tissue) in samples of oysters from
the 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
1
0.56
0.40
0. 59
2
0.51
0. 35
0.49
3
ND
0.51
ND
4
0.33
0.45
0. 60
5
1.2
0. 62
1.2
Sum of data, Ex =
2. 60
2. 33
2 . 88
Mean X =
0.650
0.466
0.720
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
2.122
1. 129
2.388
CSS = EX2 - (EX)2 =
0.432
0.0437
0.314
n
Variance =
0.1442
0.0109
0.1049
C = 0.1442 = 0.554; see Table 9 for equation.
0.260
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, variances are homogeneous and
transformation is unnecessary.
-------
Table 14. Statistical analysis of zinc nickel (ng/g wet tissue) in oysters used
in the Pensacola study.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
Sites
1
2
3
4
5
Sum of data, Ex =
Mean X =
Sun of squared data,
Ex2 =
CSS = Ex2 - (EX)2 =
n
180
170
100
120
110
680
136
97800
5320
170
260
270
220
250
1170
234
280300
6520
390
310
330
250
350
1630
326
592100
10720
Variance =
1330
1630
2680
C = 2680 = 0.475; see Table 9 for equation.
5640
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, variances are homogeneous and
transformation is unnecessary.
-------
Table 15. Analysis of variance of arsenic accumulation in oysters from tiie 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Dependent Variable:
Source
Model
Error
Corrected Total
Analysis of Variance Procedure
PPM
DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr < F
2 0.06529 0.03264 20.98 0.0001
12 0.01867 0.001556
14 0.08397
C.V.
6.689
Root MSE
0.03945
PPM Mean
0.5897
-------
Table 16. Analysis of variance of cadmium accumulation in oysters from the 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source DF
Model 2
Error 12
Corrected Total 14
Sum of Squares
0.26289
0.12360
0.38649
C.V.
24.593
Mean Square
0.13144
0.010300
Root MSE
0.10148
F Value
12.76
Pr < F
0.001
PPM Mean
0.41266
-------
Table 17. Analysis of variance of chromium accumulation in oysters from the 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable: Log PPM
Source DF
Model 2
Error 2
Corrected Total 4
Sum of Squares
0.009722
0.001721
0.01144
C.V.
18.413
Mean Square
0.004861
0.0008608
Root MSE
0.02934
F Value
5. 65
Pr < F
0.1505
PPM Mean
0.1593
-------
Table 18. Analysis of variance of copper accumulation in oysters from the 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source DF
Model 2
Error 12
Corrected Total 14
Sum of Squares
115.8573
36.320
152.177
C.V.
22.266
Mean Square
57.9286
3.02666
Root MSE
1.7397
F Value
19.14
Pr < F
0.0002
PPM Mean
7.8133
-------
Table 19. Analysis of variance of nickel accumulation in oysters from the 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
a
I
tsi
DF
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source
Model 2
Error 10
Corrected Total 12
Sum of Squares
0.15737
0.79092
0.94829
C.V.
46.812
Mean Square
0.07868
0.07909
Root MSE
0.28123
F Value
0.99
Pr < F
0.4036
PPM Mean
0.60076
-------
Table 20. Analysis of variance of zinc accumulaiion in oysters used in the Pensacola study.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
DF
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source .
Model 2
Error 12
Corrected Total 14
Sum of Squares
90280
22560
112840
C.V.
18.689
Mean Square
45140.0
1880.0
Root MSE
43.3589
F Value
24.01
Pr < F
0.0001
PPM Mean
232.0
-------
Table 21. Comparison of arsenic residues that bioaccumulated in oysters used
in the Pensacola, FL, study.
S~ = MSE" =.|0.001556 = 0.0176
At the alpha = 0.05 level,
K
Q 3.00 3.65
Sx 0.0176 0.0176
LSR = QSx 0.0529 0.0642
Treatment means from computer printout
Ref Site 1 Site 2
2.22 2.94 3.68
Mean Comparison
K LSR Difference between means
2 0.0529 Site 1 - Ref = 0.72*
3 0.0642 Site 2 - Ref = 1.46*
* Indicates significant difference at alpha = 0.05
-------
Table 22. Comparison of cadmium residues that bioaccumulated in oysters used
in the Pensacola, FL, study.
Sx =a| MSE =jo.010300 = 0.
At the alpha = 0.05 level,
0454
K
Q
sx
LSR = qs;
K
2
3
3.00
0.0454
0.136
3.65
0.0454
0.165
Treatment means from computer printout
Ref
0.272
Site 1
Site 2
0.376 0.590
Mean Comparison
LSR
0.136
0.165
Difference between means
Site 1 - Ref = 0.104 n.s.
Site 2 - Ref = 0.318*
* Indicates significant difference at alpha =
n.s = not significantly different.
0.05
-------
Table 23. Comparison of copper bioaccumulation in samples of oysters used
in the Pensacola, FL, study.
Sx ='
MSE =
n \
3.02666 = 0.7780
5
At the alpha = 0.05 level,
K
Q 3.00 3.65
Sx O.7780 0.7780
LSR = QSx 2.334 2.839
Treatment means from computer printout
Ref Site 1 Site 2
4.60 7.46 11.38
Mean Comparison
K LSR Difference between means
2 2.334 Site 1 - Ref = 2.86*
3 2.839 Site 2 - Ref = 6.78*
*
Indicates significant difference at alpha = 0.05
-------
Table 24. Comparison of zinc residu that bioaccumulated in oysters used
in the Pensacola, FL, study.
S~ = .1 MSE =, 1880 = 19.39
5
At the alpha = 0.05 level,
K
Q 3.00 3.65
Sx 19.39 19.39
LSR = QSx 58.170 70.773
Treatment means from computer printout
Ref Site 1 Site 2
136 234 326
Mean Comparison
K LSR Difference between means
2 58.170 site 1 - Ref = 98.0*
3 70.773 Site 2 - Ref = 190.0*
* Indicates significant difference at alpha = 0.05
-------
Table 25. Concentrations of selected metals in sc< ies of lugworms from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study with sediments from two sites near Pensacola, FL,
and a reference sediment.
Sediment Concentration in ua/a wet tissue weight
Location
ReDlicate
As—
Cd
Cr
Cu
Hg
Ni
PbS
Se
Zn
Reference
1
3.9
ND
0.83
6.1
ND
0.75
1.8
ND
22
2
3.8
ND
3.6
5.4
ND
2.8
ND
ND
18
3
5.3
ND
1.2
4 . 6
ND
1.0
ND
ND
105
4
6.2
ND
1.4
7.2
ND
1.2
ND
ND
16
5
4.1
ND
0.77
4 . 5
ND
0. 63
ND
ND
13
Site 1
1
5.4
ND
0.59
2.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
24
2
4.6
ND
0.41
4.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
19
3
5.3
ND
0.29
3.8
ND
ND
ND
ND
21
4
4.6
ND
0.68
3 . 5
ND
1.9
1.9
ND
58
5
5.3
ND
0.38
3.3
ND
2.6
2.6
ND
13
Site 2
1
5.7
ND
7.5
2.8
ND
4.2
4.2
ND
36
2
5.0
ND
1.3
3.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
3
5.3
ND
2.2
3 . 4
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
4
6.5
ND
1.9
4.4
ND
2.6
2.6
ND
16
5
4.7
ND
0.32
3.4
ND
4.0
4.0
ND
19
ND - Not detected.
b Concentrations are given as the maximum amount due to interference from unknown
elements.
-------
Table 26. Statistical analysis of arsenic (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of lugworms from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1
3.9
5.4
5.7
2
3.8
4.6
5.0
3
5.3
5.3
5.3
4
6.2
4.6
6.5
5
4.1
5.3
4.7
Sum of data, Zx =
23. 3
25.2
27.2
Mean X =
4.66
5.04
5.44
Sum of squared data,
Zx2 -
112.99
127.66
149.92
CSS - Ex2 - f?X)2 =
4.412
0.6520
0.4880
n
Variance =
1.103
0.1630
0.4880
C = 1.103 = .6288; see Table 9 for equation.
1.754
Chi square (3,4)=0.7457
Since calculated C value is less than the tabulated Cchi square value? transformation-was
unnecessary.
-------
Table 27. statistical analysis of chromium (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of
lugworms from the 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 12
1 0.83 0.59 7.5
2 3.6 0.41 1.3
3 1.2 0.29 2.2
4 1.4 0.68 1.9
5 0.77 0.38 0.32
Sum of data, Ex = 7.80 2.35 13.22
Mean X = 1.56 0.47 2.64
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 = 17.64 1.207 66.49
CSS = EX2 - (EX12 = 5.47 0.102 31.53
n
Variance = 1.36 0.025 7.S8
C = 7.88 = 0.851; see Table 9 for equation.
9.26
Chi square (3,4.) =» 0.7457
Since calculated C value is greater than tabulated chi square value, transformation
necessary.
-------
Table 28. Statistical analysis of copper (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of lugworms from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1
6.1
2.8
2.8
2
5.4
4.6
3.2
3
4.6
3.8
3.4
4
7.2
3.5
4.4
5
4.5
3.3
3.4
Sum of data, Ex =
27.8
18.0
17.2
Mean X =
5.56
3.60
3.44
Sum of squared data,
M
X
to
II
159.62
66.58
60.56
CSS = Ex2 - (EX)2 =
5.052
1.780
1.392
n
Variance =
1.263
0.445
0.3480
C = 1.263 = 0.6143; see Table 9 for equation.
2.056
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than of Chi square value, transformation was
unnecessary.
-------
Table 29. Statistical analysis of nickel (/ig/g wet tissue) in samples of lugworms from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
l
0. 75
ND
4.2
2
2.8
ND
ND
3
1.0
ND
ND
4
1.2
1.9
2.6
5
0.63
2.6
4.0
Sum of data, Ex =
6.38
4.5
10.8
Mean X =
1.27
2.25
3 .60
Sum of squared data,
Zx2 =
11.23
10.37
40.40
CSS = Ex2 - (EX}2 =
3.098
0.2450
1.520
n
Variance =
0.7746
0.2450
0.7600
C = 0.7746 = 0.435; see Table 9 for equation.
1.779
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, transformation
unnecessary.
-------
Table 30. Statistical analysis of zinc (M9/9 wet tissue) in samples of lugworms from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
1
22
24
36
2
18
19
60
3
105
21
15
4
16
58
16
5
13
13
19
Sum of data, 2x =
174
135
146
Mean X =
34.8
27.0
29.2
Sum of squared data,
2x2 -
12258.0
4911.0
5738.0
CSS = Zx2 - fSXl2 =
6202.8
1266.0
1474.8
n
Variance =
1550.7
316. 5
368.7
Since the mean concentration for reference sediment samples was greater than the mean
concentration for Site 1 or 2, no further analyses were performed.
-------
Table 31. Analysis of variance of arsenic accu tion in lugvorms from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source DF
Model 2
Error 12
Corrected Total 14
Sum of Squares
1.5213
7.0160
8.5373
Mean Square
0.76066
0.58466
F Value
1.30
Pr < F
0.308
¦p»
c.v.
15.151
Root MSE
0.76463
PPM Mean
5.0466
-------
Table 32. Analysis of variance of chromium accumulation in lugworms from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Dependent Variable:
Source
Model
Error
Corrected Total
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Log PPM
DF
2
12
14
Sum of Squares
0.25287
0.46742
0.72000
Mean Square
0.12629
0.03895
F Value Pr < F
3.24 0.0749
C.V.
58.030
Root MSE
0.19736
Log PPM Mean
0.34009
-------
Table 33. Analysis of variance of nickel accumulation in lugworms from the 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent
Variable:
PPM
Source
DF
Sum of Scruares
Mean Scruare
F Value Pr < F
Model
2
10.14364
5.07189
7.30 0.0194
Error
7
4.8635
0.6947
Corrected
Total
9
15.0071
C.V.
Root MSE
PPM Mean
38.447
0.83353
2.1680
-------
Table 34. Comparison of nickel residues that bioaccumulated in lugworms for the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
A*? A~
Sx = - IMSE = 10.6947 = 0.3727
5
At the alpha = 0.05 level,
K
Q 3.00 3.65
Sx 0.3727 0.3727
LSR = QSy 1.118 1.360
Treatment means from computer printout
Ref Site 1 Site 2
1.27 2.25 3.60
Mean Comparison
K LSR Difference between means
2 1.118 Site 1 - Ref = 0.98 n.s.
3 1.360 Site 2 - Ref = 2.33 *
* Indicates significant difference at alpha =
n.s. not significantly different
0.05
-------
Table 35. Concentrations of selected metals in samples of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study with sediments from two sites near Pensacola, FL,
and a reference sediment.
Sediment Concentration in ua/a wet tissue weight
Zn
Location
Replicate
As—
Cd
Cr
Cu
m
Ni
PbS
Se
Reference
1
8.0
0.31
0. 67
13
SL
ND
ND
ND
16
2
7.9
0.15
0.30
10
SL
ND
ND
ND
11
3
7.8
0.15
0.33
14
SL
ND
ND
ND
14
4
9.3
ND
0.27
12
SL
ND
ND
ND
16
5
8.8
0.13
0.15
12
SL
ND
ND
ND
25
Site 1
1
8.8
0.23
0.85
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
18
2
11
0. 18
0.38
12
ND
ND
ND
ND
15
3
8.1
0.16
0.49
11
ND
0.71
1.1
ND
16
4
8.7
0.21
0. 27
9.1
ND
ND
1.5
ND
25
5
9.9
0.15
0.40
10
ND
0.61
1.4
ND
18
Site 2
1
9.6
0.12
0.49
9.9
ND
0.40
1.2
ND
14
2
9.8
0.15
0.24
12
ND
ND
1.5
ND
15
3
10
0. 13
0.23
10
ND
ND
1.2
ND
13
4
8.8
0.18
0.34
11
ND
0.57
1.8
ND
18
5
9.9
0.15
0.33
12
ND
ND
2.0
ND
20
ND = Not detected.
SL - samples lost
a Background subtraction techniques normally used could not be applied
due to interference from unknown elements that cause intense background
signal. Therefore, arsenic and lead values are reported as maximum possible
concentrations.
-------
Table 36. Statistical analysis of arsenic (ng/g wet tissue) in i. ies of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1 8.0 8.8 9.6
2 7.9 11 9.8
3 7.8 8.1 10
4 9.3 8.7 8.8
5 8.8 9.9 9.9
Sum of data, Ex = 41.8 46.5 48.1
Mean X = 8.36 9.30 9.62
Sxim of squared data,
Ex2 = 351.18 437.75 463.65
CSS = Ex2 - fSXl2 = 1.732 5.300 0.9280
n
Variance = 0.4330 1.3250 0.2320
C 1.325 = 0.665; see Table 9 for equation.
1.990
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is greater than tabulated Chi square value, transformation is necessary.
-------
Table 37. Statistical analysis of cadmium (Mg/g wet tissue) in samples of shrimp from the 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1
2
3
4
5
Sum of data, Ex =
Mean X =
Sum of squared data,
Sx2 =
CSS = Ex2 - (T.X)2 =
n
0.31
0.15
0.15
ND
0.13
0.74
0.185
0.158
0.0211
0.23
0. 18
0.16
0.21
0.15
0.93
0.186
0.177
0.0045
0.12
0.15
0.13
0.18
0.15
0.73
0.146
0.108
0.0021
Variance =
0.0070
0.0011
0.0005
Because of similarity of means or because mean for Site 1 was less than the mean
for the reference sediment, no further analyses was necessary.
-------
Table 38. Statistical analysis of chromium (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate
(n = 5)
Reference
1
Sites
2
1
0.67
0.85
0.49
2
0.30
0.38
0.34
3
0.33
0.49
0.23
4
0.27
0.27
0.34
5
0.15
0.40
0.33
Sum of data, Zx =
1.72
2.39
1.73
Mean X =
0. 34
0.47
0.35
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
0.743
1.33
0.633
CSS = Ex2 - (EX}2 =
0.151
0.197
0.034
n
Variance =
0.037
0.049
0.0086
C = 0.049 = 0.518; see Table 9 for equation.
0.0946
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, transformation was
unnecessary.
-------
Table 39. Statistical analysis of copper (/ug/< tissue) in samples of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1 13 16 9.9
2 10 12 12
3 14 11 10
4 12 9.1 11
5 12 10 12
Sum of data, Ex = 61 58.1 54.9
Mean X = 12.2 11.6 10.9
Sum of squared data,
Sx2 = 753.0 703.8 607.0
CSS = Sx2 - XSX12 = 8.80 28.68 4.20
n
Variance = 2.20 7.17 1.05
Since mean concentration in reference samples was greater than mean
concentrations in samples from Site 1 and Site 2, no further analyses
were performed.
-------
Table 40. Statistical analysis of lead (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5)
1
2
1
ND
ND
1.2
2
ND
ND
1.5
3
ND
1.1
1.2
4
ND
1.5
1.8
5
ND
1.4
2.0
Sum of data, Ex =
—
4.0
7.7
Mean X =
—
1.33
1.54
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 =
—
5.42
12.37
CSS = Ex2 - (EX)2 =
—
0.0867
0.512
n
Variance =
—
0.0433
0.128
ND = Not detected.
Since no detectable concentrations were found in reference samples, no
further analyses were performed.
-------
Table 41. Statistical analysis of zinc (ng/g wet tissue) in samples of shrimp from a 10-day
bioaccuuiulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Reference Sites
(n = 5) 1 2
1 16 18 14
2 11 15 15
3 14 16 10
4 16 25 18
5 25 18 20
Sum of data, Sx = 82 92 77
Mean X = 16.4 18.4 15.4
Sum of squared data,
Sx2 = 1454 1754 1245
CSS = Sx2 - 1EX12 = 109.2 61.2 59.2
n
Variance = 27.3 15.3 14.8
C = 27.3 = 0.475; see Table 9 for equation.
54.4
Chi square (3,4) = 0.7457
Since calculated C is less than tabulated Chi square value, transformation was
unnecessary.
-------
Table 42. Analysis of variance of arsenic accumulation in shrimp from a 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL, using transformed data.
Dependent Variable:
Source
Model
Error
Corrected Total
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Log PPM
DF
2
12
14
Sum of Squares
0.0081826
0.014265
0.022447
Mean Square
0.0004091
0.001188
F Value Pr < F
3.44 0.0659
C.V.
3.439
Root MSE
0.03447
Log PPM Mean
1.0023
-------
Table 43. Analysis of variance of chromium accumulation in shrimp from a 10-day bioaccumulation
study, Pensacola, FL, using transformed data.
Dependent Variable:
Source
Model
Error
Corrected Total
Analysis of Variance Procedure
PPM
DF
2
12
14
Sum of Squares
0.058973
0.383525
0.44249
Mean Square
0.02948
0.03196
F Value
0.92
Pr < F
0.4239
C.V.
45.917
Root MSE
0.17877
PPM Mean
0.3893
-------
Table 44. Analysis of variance of zinc accumulation in shrimp from a 10-day bioaccumulation study,
Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable: PPM
Source DF
Model 2
Error 12
Corrected Total 14
Sum of Squares
23.3333
229.6000
252.9333
Mean Square
11.66666
19.13333
F Value
0.61
Pr < F
0.559
C.V.
26.1404
Root MSE
4.37417
PPM Mean
16.733
-------
Table 45. Concentrations of aliphatic and aromatic fractions of petroleum hydrocarbons in
replicate samples of three marine organisms. Each group of organisms was analyzed
before and after exposure to sediment from Pensacola, FL, in a 10-day bioaccumulation
study. Concentrations are given in Mg/g wet tissue.
Sample
Origin
ShrimD
Lucrworm
Ovster
Pre-test
Sediment
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1 2
Pre-test
Animals
Aliphatic
0.80
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
17
17
NA
NA
6.8
3.6
NA
NA
NA
_
Aromatic
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
3.9
2.9
NA
NA
NA
2.5
ND
NA
NA
NA
— -
Site 1
Aliphatic
3.1
5.3
1.4
1.21
0.96
10
12
12
12
8.7
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.6
9.0
Aromatic
ND
ND
0.63
ND
ND
1.9
4.7
8.3
0.78
2.6
ND
0.96
ND
ND
ND
ND
Site 2
Aliphatic
ND
ND
1.1
3.9
ND
12
9.3
7.4
8.4
20
1.4
1.7
1.2
0.85
5.0
ND
Aromatic
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.5
4.9
5.1
2.9
44
ND
0.77
1.8
2.5
5.8
ND
Reference
Aliphatic
0.81
ND
SC
ND
ND
11
7.4
7.1
9.8
6.4
ND
0.88
1.4
1.6
1.8
16
Aromatic
ND
ND
2.5
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5
3.2
ND
ND
ND
1.3
ND = Not detected.
NA = Sample not applicable.
SC = Sample contaminated, unable to quantitate accurately.
-------
Table 46. Statistical analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons (/Ltc wet tissues) in shrimp
from a 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Sites
Reference 1 2.
ALH ARH ALH ARH ALH ARH
1
0.81
ND
3.1
ND
ND
ND
2
ND
ND
5.3
ND
ND
ND
3
SC
2.5
1.4
0.63
1.1
ND
4
ND
ND
1.2
ND
3.9
ND
5
ND
ND
0.96
ND
ND
ND
Sum Sx =
0.81
2.5
11.96
0.63
5.0
-
Mean X =
0.81
2.5
2.39
0.63
2.50
-
Sum of squared
data,
Sx2 =
0.656
6.25
42.02
0.396
16.42
-
CSS =
0
0
13.41
0
3.92
-
Variance =
•
•
3.35
•
3.92
-
ND = Not detected.
SC = Sample contaminated, unable to quantitate accurately.
Since only one detectable concentration was determined for the aromatic
and the aliphatic fractions in the reference samples, no further analyses
were performed.
-------
Table 47. Statistical analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons (/ig/g wet tissues) in oysters
from a 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Replicate Sites
Reference
1
2
ALH
ARH
ALH
ARH
ALH
ARH
1
ND
2.5
1.8
ND
1.4
ND
2
0.88
3.2
1.8
0.96
1.7
0.77
3
1.4
ND
1.3
ND
1.2
1.8
4
1.6
ND
1.3
ND
0.85
2 . 5
5
1.8
ND
1.6
ND
5.0
5.8
Sum Ex
=
5.68
5.7
7.8
0.96
10.15
10.87
Mean X
=
1.42
2.85
1.56
0.96
2.03
2.71
Sum of
squared
data,
Ex2 =
8.53
16.49
12.42
0. 092
30.01
43.72
CSS =
0.468
0.245
0.252
0
11.40
14.18
Variance =
0.156
0.245
0.063
2.85
4.72
ND = Not detected.
There were insufficient number of data points for aromatic hydrocarbons
to perform analysis of variance.
-------
Table 48. Statistical analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons (jug/g wet tissues) in lugworms
used in the Pensacola study.
Replicate Sites
Reference 1
ALH ARH ALH ARH AUj ARH
1 11 11 10 1.9 12 3.5
2 7.4 ND 128 4.7 9.3 4.9
3 7.1 ND 123 8.3 7.4 5.1
4 9.8 ND 123 0.78 8.4 2.9
5 6.4 ND 8.7 2.6 20 4.4
Stun Ex = 41.7 11.0 54.7 18.28 57.1 20.8
Mean X = 8.34 11.0 10.94 3.65 11.4 4.16
Sum of squared data,
Ex2 = 363.17 121.0 607.69 101.95 755.81 90.04
CSS = 15.39 0.0 9.27 35.12 103.72 3.51
Variance = 3.84 2.31 8.78 25.9 0.878
ND = Not detected.
C (ALH) = 25.9 = 0.808 Chi square (4,4) - 0.6284; see Table 9 for equation.
32.05
Since calculated C is greater than tabulated Chi square for ALH, variances are not homogenous and
transformation is necessary.
-------
Table 49. Analysis of variance of aliphatic petroleum hydrocarbon residue accumulation in
oysters from a 10-day bioaccumulation study, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent
Source
Variable:
Log PPM
DF
Sum of Scruares
Mean Souare
F Value
Pr < F
Model
2
0.0083266
0.004163
0.25
0.781
Error
11
0.181706
0.016518
Corrected
Total
13
C.V.
31.300
Root MSE
0.1285
Log PPM Mean
0.4106
-------
Table 50. Analysis of variance of aliphatic petroleum hydrocarbon residue accumulation in
lugworms from a 10-day bioaccumulation, Pensacola, FL.
Analysis of Variance Procedure
Dependent Variable:
Source
Model
Error
Corrected Total
C.V. Root MSE PPM Mean
31.964 3.27098 10.2333
PPM
DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr < F
2 27.46133 13.73066 1.28 0.3126
12 128.3920 10.69933
14 155.8533
-------
APPENDIX E
BENTHIC STUDIES
SITE B NOVEMBER 1986
SITE B APRIL 1987
SITE C NOVEMBER 1986
SITE C APRIL 1987
DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS
-------
SITE B NOVEMBER 1986
Biological Community Parameters
Biomass Data
Taxonomic List
E-l
-------
SITE B
BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY PARAMETERS
EPA—PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
Sample Type: MACROFAUNA
Sample Date (YY/MM/DD): 86/11/07
Sample Area
-------
Uet weight blomass Cor Pensacole, Florida, B Sice, Novenber 1986. All weights In grans.
STATION run
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 1
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP (
REP L
REP 8
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PFII
ANB.IDA
0.031
0.021
0.031
0.412
0.004
0.018
0.071
0.025
0.031
0.021
0.004
0.012
0.032
0.021
0.024
0.383
*81
AITttOrOM
0.031
0.017
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.004
O.OOS
0.004
0.007
0.023
0.004
0.007
0.004
0.001
0.002
0.130
*81
HOLUfitA
0.004
0.190
0.044
0.015
0.521
0.001
0.070
0.013
0.054
0.003
0.009
0.002
0.148
0.022
O.OOI
1.121
*11
ECNtRQSERRATA
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.001
O.OOI
0.005
0.015
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.030
*11
USCElLAtfOUS
0.000
0.001
0.007
0.001
O.OOI
0.053
0.002
0.004
0.009
0.003
0.002
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.089
TOTAL
0.077
0.229
0.121
0.634
0.532
0.081
0.149
0.053
0.114
0.053
0.019
0.022
0.183
0.044
0.029
1.733
STATION Tim
UP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 1
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP t
REP L
REP 8
REP II
REP 0
totals
*82
ANK1IM
0.024
0.008
0.020
0.613
0.015
0.032
0.034
0.004
0.074
0.271
0.003
0.013
0.005
0.619
O.OOS
O.S42
*12
AITttOPOH
0.003
0.007
0.008
0.041
0.003
0.002
O.OOI
0.007
0.014
0.083
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.041
0.007
0.180
*12
NOLUBCA
0.010
0.025
0.021
0.039
0.007
1.429
0.014
0.023
0.042
0.017
0.011
0.015
0.039
0.033
0.014
1.741
*12
ECHIRDKRIIAH
O.OOI
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
0.010
*12
HISCElLAtfOUS
0.003
0.015
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.004
0.011
0.003
O.OOI
0.002
0.007
0.003
0.041
TOTAL
0.043
0.055
0.052
0.124
0.027
t.445
0.052
0.034
0.134
0.303
0.024
0.034
0.051
0.100
0.030
2.534
STATION TV*
REP A
REP P
REP C
REP !
REP E
REP F
REP 8
REP H
REP 1
REP i
REP K
REP L
REP II
REP N
Kt «
10TALS
*13
ANSL10A
0.012
0.004
0.027
0.6(4
0.011
0.003
0.020
0.004
0.0S7
o.oto
O.OOS
0.015
0.003
0.003
0.014
0.204
*1)
AITHOKM
0.003
0.007
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.002
O.OOI
0.003
0.00.
0.013
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.048
*13
HOUIBCA
0.031
0.033
0.049
0.028
0.031
0.028
0.020
0.007
O.OOI
0.139
0.010
0.044
0.014
0.008
0.004
0.449
*83
ECH1R08ERMTA
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOS
0.000
O.OOI
O.OA
O.OOI
0.004
0.004
O.OOI
0.000
0.023
*13
MISCELLANEOUS
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.00)
0.001
0.002
0.003
O.OOI
4.000
0.003
O.OOI
0.003
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.005
0.035
TOTAL
0.049
0.051
0.084
0.054
0.048
0.040
0.050
0.013
0.042
0.IS4
0.030
0.071
0.030
0.014
0.025
0.781
STATIC* TIIW
R£P ft
REP 1
REP C
RET 1
REP E
rep r
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP 1
REP L
REP R
REP N
REP 0
TOTRLS
*14
ANffllM
0.024
0.020
0.004
0.942
0.007
0.004
0.005
0.010
0.014 '
0.012
0.017
0.011
0.045
0.009
0.010
1.140
*M
ABTHtOPOM
0.010
0.003
0.004
0.010
0.004
0.003
0.009
O.OOS
0.008
0.008
0.371
0.012
0.003
0.013
0.003
0.472
*14
NOLIUSCA
0.007
0.001
0.019
0.919
0.027
0.002
0.035
0.015
0.008
0.004
0.014
0.009
0.003
0.030
0.004
0.108
*84
ECNIROKMAIA
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.901
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
0.901
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.013
*•4
MISCELLANEOUS
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.001
O.OOS
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.005
0.003
0.034
TOTAL
0.04)
0.028
0.833
0.984
0.043
0.011
0.055
0.032
0.934
0.024
0.404
0.034
0.035
0.058
0.023
1.847
STATION HIM
KF A
REP 8
REP C
REP 1
REP C
REP F
REP S
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP N
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
*13
AttEUDA
0.003
0.017
0.013
0.929
0.032
0.128
0.007
0.022
0.004
0.009
0.011
0.102
0.012
0.019
0.011
0.423
*U
MTKMPOOA
0.003
0.004
0.011
0.910
0.014
0.002
0.007
0.010
0.904
O.OOI
0.011
0.023
0.015
0.002
O.OOS
0.124
PF83
DOLUJSCA
0.060
0.020
0.041
0.940
0.054
0.102
0.032
0.049
O.OS3
0.073
0.082
0.094
0.032
0.031
0.044
0.898
*15
CCHIHUCRMIA
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOS
0.901
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.005
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
0.000
O.OOS
O.OOI
0.001
0.025
*15
HISCELLAKOUS
0.001
0.003
0.003
O.M!
0.005
.0.004
0.004
0.043
0.002
0.VO2
0.009
O.OOS
0.033
0.003
0.007
0.109
TOTAL
0.070
0.047
0.100
o.ou
0.108
0.239
0.07S
0.105
0.068
0.084
0.113
0.224
0.137
0.034
0.070
1.381
STATION TAION
KEF A
REP 1
REP (
REP 8
REP E
ttPf
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP H
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
*14
AMRCLIOA
0.008
0.049
0.02*
0.005
0.015
0.008
0.014
0.009
0.019
0.009
0.003
0.009
0.004
0.018
0.038
0.238
*84
MTHMPOM
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.004
9.011
0.008
0.008
0.002
0.009
9.002
0.003
0.001
0.007
0.002
0.073
*84
houusca
0.023
0.004
0.021
0.045
0.032
0.027
0.023
0.038
0.009
12.040
0.014
0.029
O.OOS
0.038
0.011
12.383
*14
ECHINOOUMTA
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOS
O.OOI
0.003
0.000
O.OOI
9.044
0.001
0.001
0.011
O.OOI
0.093
*14
luscauNcous
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.007
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.003
O.OOI
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.054
TOTAL
0.039
0.042
t.ost
0.0*0
0.059
0.058
0.052
O.OU
0.033
12.040
9.089
0.043
0.014
0.078
O.OU
12.841
STATION TAION
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP 1
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP II
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
*17
AMEUDA
0.047
0.013
0.034
0.023
0.007
0.008
0.004
0.037
0.002
0.004
0.011
0.009
0.027
0.002
0.007
0.239
*17
ARTKROMOA
0.003
0.002
0.40}
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.007
0.013
0.010
0.002
0.002
0.024
0.034
0.003
0.005
0.323
*17
KOUUSCA
0.021
0.003
0.004
0.014
0.034
0.021
0.003
0.011
0.004
0.171
0.011
0.002
O.OOI
0.002
0.004
0.310
*17
EOUKUEVMTA
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.004
O.OOI
0.003
O.OOI
2.310
0.004
0.004
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
0.000
2.134
*17
niscelujceous
0.013
0.002
0.004
0.022
0.007
0.011
0.007
0.004
0.019
0.044
9.007
0.002
0.004
O.OOS
0.004
0.141
TOTAL
0.090
0.021
0.444
0.049
0.055
0.044
0.024
2.379
0.039
0.229
0.032
0.040
0.049
0.012
0.020
3.S49
STATION TAION
W A
REP 1
REP C
REP t
RIP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP I
REP i
KEP K
REP L
REP K
REP ¦
REP 0
TOTALS
*88
AUCL1DA
0.021
0.039
0.014
0.022
0.022
0.042
0.031
0.019
0.014
0.044
0.024
0.014
0.010
0.012
0.008
0.372
*M
ARTNOPOO*
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.011
0.003
0.002
0.008
9.004
0.003
0.003
0.004
O.OIS
9.073
*M
ROUUSCA
0.028
0.022
0.034
0.029
0.033
0.025
0.061
0.031
0.042
0.047
9.084
0.018
0.024
0.024
0.074
9.434
*M
ECHIttKUATA
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.004
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOI
v.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.090
0.001
9.008
*18
MISCELLANEOUS
0.044
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.002
9.010
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.007
0.106
TOTAL
9.099
0.044
0.054
0.058
0.044
0.099
0.132
0.027
0.043
0.123
0.124
0.037
0.050
0.044
0.10S
1.197
E-3
-------
station rim
IEP A
SEP 1
KPC
KP 1
REP E
REP f
KP 6
REP H
REP I
REM
REP K
RE? 1
REPS
REP H
REP 0
TOTALS
PfW MBCilH
0.006
0.020
0.043
0.012
0.023
0.029
0.019
0.023
0.031
0.037
0.014
0.039
0.009
0.028
0.010
0.391
PFI9 ttTWOPOM
0.009
0.012
0.024
0.024
0.007
0.004
0.001
0.004
0.047
0.018
0.014
0.014
0.023
0.014
0.003
0.244
PFI9 NOLUJSCA
0.010
0.114
0.009
0.007
0.024
0.017
0.012
0.029
0.019
0.022
0.019
0.003
0.017
O.OU
0.007
0.320
PFI9 rOUMOOMTI
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.020
P«1 HISCEUitfOUS
0.016
0.007
0.001
0.009
0.004
0.002
0.007
0.007
0.001
0.012
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.003
0.075
TOTAL
0.047
0.194
0.100
0.043
0.099
0.0S3
0.0)4
0.044
0.139
0.089
0.034
0.042
0.093
0.099
0.023
1.090
STATION TAW
SEP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP *
REP 1
REP J
REP t
REP I
REP II
REP N
KP 0
TOTALS
*110 MNEUM
0.055
0.010
0.017
0.027
0.009
0.003
0.043
0.042
0.039
0.023
0.037
0.004
0.011
0.012
0.008
0.344
PfllO MTKUPOM
0.009
0.003
0.008
0.001
0.017
0.003
0.002
0.02S
0.00)
0.003
0.009
0.00)
0.012
0.008
0.009
0.120
PTI10 MUUSCA
0.094
0.011
0.031
0.138
0.014
0.003
0.007
0.014
0.044
0.030
0.023
0.009
0.003
0.012
0.024
0.434
pfito equnokrraia
0.000
0.012
o.oot
0.002
0.003
0.000
0.013
0.001
0.002
0.00)
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.004
O.OOI
0.090
PfllO RISCEUAREOUS
0.009
0.024
0.007
0.009
0.003
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.049
TOTAL
0.1 If
0.049
0.084
0.184
0.048
0.014
0.048
0.109
0.089
0.040
0.074
0.020
0.034
0.037
0.044
1.059
tin ion ruoi
UP A
REP 1
IIP c
REPI
REP 1
REM
KP 6
REP 1
REP 1
REP J
KP K
REP L
REP N
REPR
KP 0
TOTALS
mil inaiH
1.004
0.014
0.002
0.011
0.009
0.004
0.003
0.017
0.073
0.002
0.028
0.042
0.018
0.034
0.018
O.W
Kin amum
4.002
0.009
0.023
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.001
0.018
0.009
0.004
0.014
0.001
0.012
0.009
O.OOS
0.1 IS
Will MLUBCA
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.001
0.091
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.033
0.054
0.101
0.003
0.004
0.039
0.012
0.333
Will EOUHOKMTI
0.000
0.027
0.000
0.008
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.090
pnii nscauMEous
0.012
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.003
0.031
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.003
o.oot
0.012
0.0T9
TOTAL
0.02)
O.OS7
0.034
0.029
0.041
0.018
0.012
0.091
0.143
0.043
0.148
0.044
0.038
0.081
0.048
0.8S4
BTITIQM Tim
REP A
REPI
KP C
REP 1
REP E
REP f
REP (
REP H
KP 1
REP i
REP I
REP L
REP N
REP N
BPO
TOTALS
prill maiM
0.017
0.007
0.012
0.019
0.003
0.012
O.OOI
0.004
0.017
0.010
0.010
0.004
0.013
0.011
0.029
0.149
Pf 112 ABTttOPOM
O.OJ3
0.004
0.004
0.013
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.011
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.019
0.118
PFI12 nuusu
0.0)4
0.003
0.004
0.013
0.013
0.009
0.003
0.004
0.007
0.010
0.010
0.001
0.191
0.010
0.002
0.274
PFI12 ECNiNQKRMTA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.012
mil Mscautfous
0.012
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.010
0.003
0.101
0.041
TOTAL
0.097
0.011
0.072
0.049
0.022
0.024
0.014
0.018
0.033
0.030
0.039
0.013
0.180
0.024
0.091
0.434
STATION TAIM
ttf A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
KP G
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
KP N
REP R
REP 0
TOTALS
Pf||) AMfltOA
9.012
0.041
0.012
0.008
0.014
0.030
0.048
0.072
0.041
O.OU
0.013
0.004
0.034
0.004
0.012
0.301
mi) AftTMPOM
0.004
0.01!
0.012
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.013
0.013
0.007
0.008
0.022
0.004
0.009
0.009
0.008
0.133
mi3 nouuscA
0.117
0.042
0.024
0.054
0.138
0.044
0.107
0.053
0.033
0.058
0.097
0.054
0.034
0.053
0.072
0.984
Pf 113 ECHlNOKHATA
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.003
mi) risceujmeous
0.012
0.003
0.001
0.010
0.302
0.009
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.004
O.OOI
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.394
TOTAL
0.147
0.119
0.049
0.077
0.498
0.102
0.173
0.094
0.083
0.082
0.093
0.044
0.081
O.OU
0.094
\.m
STATION TAIM
IEP A
RIP 1
REP C
REP 1
IEP £
REP F
UP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
KP «
REP N
KP 0
TOTALS
mil Anniu
0.010
0.003
0.034
0.003
0.026
0.004
0.002
O.OU
0.008
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.004
0.017
0.004
0.190
mi4 ARTHRSPUA
0.00)
0.014
0.018
0.003
0.008
0.007
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.004
0.008
0.004
0.082
mil IQLLUSCA
0.070
0.113
0.007
0.001
0.024
0.118
0.150
0.040
0.047
0.014
0.013
0.119
0.010
0.017
0.008
0.780
PTI14 EOUMKftMU
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
0.002
O.OOI
0.000
0.002
O.OU
mi4 RJSCELUUEOUS
0.00)
0.004
o.oot
0.001
0.001
0.002
O.OOI
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.002
0.021
TOTAL
0,007
0.134
0.042
0.018
0.043
0.1)2
0.134
0.084
0.080
0.024
0.024
0.134
0.022
0.043
0.022
1.093
STATION IAIOI
REP A
ft£P 1
IEP C
REP 1
HEP E
REP F
KP I
REP H
KP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
KP N
REP H
RCP 8
TOTALS
mis AfttllftA
0.029
0.0)0
0.003
0.024
0.023
0.019
0.007
0.047
0.028
0.027
0.0)5
0.020
0.024
0.020
0.002
0.342
PTIIS ARlttOPQDA
0.010
0.013
0.004
0.019
0.007
0.029
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.005
0.004'
0.004
0.013
0.005
0.003
0.135
PTIIS MLLUSCA
0.002
0.024
0.009
0.0)0
0.003
0.020
0.004
O.OOS
0.015
0.339
0.001
0.010
0.010
0.024
0.002
0.522
miS ECHIAOOERRATA
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
o.ooi
O.OOI
0.000
0.017
mis HtSCCLUSOUS
0.004
0.014
o.oot
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
O.OOI
0.003
0.038
TOTAL
0.044
0.081
0.020
0.07S
O.OI9
0.070
0.019
0.041
0.051
0.394
0.042
O.OU
0.952
0.093
0.010
1.054
STATION TAION
BE? A
REP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
rep r
REP &
REP H
REP 1
REP J
KP K
REP L
KP N
IEP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PTIli AflCLIM
0.000
0.029
0.003
0.010
0.040
0.098
0.002
O.OOI
0.038
0.079
0.023
0.008
0.034
0.017
0.011
0.313
PTIli ARTMHPOM
0.008
0.020
0.002
0.007
0.004
0.007
0.004
O.OOS
4.010
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.001
0.015
0.004
0.113
mi4 WLUSCA
0.049
0.0J7
24.017
O.OU
0.012
0.041
O.OSl
0.021
0.010
0.042
0.020
0.02B
0.099
0.010
0.241
24.449
PTIli EQJIRQ8ERMTA
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
O.ttO
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOI
0.009
mu RISCELLAIEQB
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.008
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.004
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
0.023
O.OOI
0.049
TOTAL
0.044
0.061
24.023
0.034
0.097
0.128
0.041
0.030
0.099
0.083
0.092
0.044
0.097
0.049
0.278
29.149
E-4
-------
imi(B TU.014
0.030
0.010
0.013
0.029
0.024
0.007
1.192
Pfll8
MTM0P8U
0.019
0.0J2
0.004
0.00)
0.021
0.011
0.004
0.004
J.013
0.009
0.411
0.010
0.019
0.010
0.007
0.149
Pflll
VLiusa
0.029
0.009
0.002
0.001
0.00)
0.002
0.003
0.002
¦).004
0.007
0.001
O.OOl
0.004
0.011
0.003
0.074
m\t
ECHIMKMTA
0.000
0.006
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.00)
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.018
Pf tl8
mstCLuwceus
0.009
0.009
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.008
0.001
0.009
0.00)
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.090
TOTAL
0.09)
0.0*1
0.0)2
0.8U
0.041
0.119
0.042
0.022
0.042
0.043
0.0)3
0.027
0.048
0.048
0.018
1.449
STATIM TAIQi
UP A
KP 1
KP C
KP ft
KP C
KP F
KP S
SEP H
KP 1
KP J
MP I
KP L
kp n
KP 9
KP 0
TOTALS
Pflll
Att&IBA
0.019
0.021
0.014
0.007
0.019
o.ooe
0.029
0.021
0.022
0.017
0.003
0.007
0.049
0.003
0.004
0.297
PF819
0.0<0
0.007
0.002
0.007
0.007
0.002
0.012
0.02)
0.008
0.012
0.021
0.009
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.14)
Pfll9
NQLUfSCA
0.001
0.009
0.02)
0.009
0.819
0.004
0.011
0.004
0.018
0.00)
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.00)
0.928
Pfll9
CDUNOaURATA
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.401
0.001
0.347
0.001
0.001
0.978
Pf Bit
IISCCUAKOUS
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.02)
O.OOl
0.00)
O.OQ9
0.001
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.094
TOTAL
0.074
0.0)4
0.040
0.04)
0.14)
0.010
0.097
0.093
0.092
0.0)9
0.0)3
0.022
0.44)
0.018
0.019
1.980
STATION TAIOa
KP A
kp i
KP C
KP 1
KP E
KP F
KP 6
KP H
KP (
KP J
KP K
KP I
REP R
KP N
REP 0
TOTALS
Pf|»
0.02)
0.0)4
0.014
O.OIf
0.020
0.001
0.019
0.009
0.019
0.01)
0.037
0.008
0.008
0.018
0.007
0.79)
Pf 120
AITHMPOOA
0.003
o.on
0.001
0.090
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.020
0.003
O.OOv
0.014
0.008
0.009
0.004
0.002
0.191
Pf 120
HOLIUSU
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
9.004
0.008
0.004
0.004
0.001
o.ooe
0.002
0.00)
0.071
PF820
COtlKOMSMATA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.vOI
0.*)0
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.011
PfttO
mscautfous
0.094
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.00)
0.002
0.003
0.001
O.OOl
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.013
0.004
0.109
TOTAL
0.090
0.054
0.0)1
0.077
0.0)7
0.011
0.030
0.03)
0.032
0.078
0.043
0.020
0.024
0.040
0.014
0.999
E-5
-------
TAI0NDH1C L1ST1N6
TAlONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPfl-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
s:::ss:s:ss=ssssss3ssssssssrs:ssssssssssssssssss::sss:ssssz:::s:s:ssss:ssssssss
ANNELIDA
0L16DCHAETA
0LI60CHAETA (LPID*
POLYCHAETA
AHPHARETIDAE
AHPHARETE SP.A
AHPHARET1DAE ILPIL)
AMPHICTEIS SCAPHOBRANCHIATA
ISOLOA PULCHELLA
NEL1NNA NACULATA
SABELLIOES SP.A
AHPHINOHIDAE
CHLOEIA VIRIDIS
PARAHPHlkOftt SP.B
ARABELLIDAE
ARABELLIDAE (LPIL)
DRILONEREIS L0N6A
CAPITELLIDAE
CAPITELLA CAPITATA
CAPITELLIDAE (LPIL)
HEDIOOASTUS (LPIL)
HED10HASTUS CALIFORNIENSIS
NOTOHASTUS (LPIL)
CHAETOPTERIDAE
HESOCHAETOPTERUS (LPIL)
SPIOCNAETOPTERUS OCULATUS
CHRVSOPETALIDAE
BHAUANIA HETEROSETA
PALEANOTUS SP.A
CIRRATULIDAE
CAULLERIELLA (LPIL)
CAULLERIELLA CF. ALATA
CHAETOZONE (LPIL)
CIRRATULIDAE (LPIL)
CIRRIFORHIA (LPIL)
mm (LPIL)
THARYI CF. ANNULOSUS
DORVILLEIDAE
0U6IA TENUIDENTIS
PETTIBONEIA OUOFURCA
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
SCHIST0HERIN6OS CF. RUDOLPHI
SCHIST0NERIN60S PECTINATA
EUN1CIDAE
EUNICE VITTATA
EUNICIDAE (LPIL)
LVSIDICE SP.B
FLHElLimm
"LPIL - Lowest Practicable
Identification Level FUttUKEMME aPIU
E-6
-------
TAI0N0H1C LISTING
TAIONONIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
09/01/87
THEROCHAETA SP.A
GLYCERIDAE
GLYCERA (LPIL)
6LYCERA DIBRANCHIATA
6LYCERA SP.A
GLYCERA SP.E
GLYCERA SP.I
GLYCERA SP.D
GLYCERIDAE (LPIL)
GONIADIOAE
GONIADA LITTOREA
GONIADIDAE (LPIL)
GONIADIDES CAROLINAE
HESIONIDAE
HESIONIDAE (LPIL)
HESIONIDAE GENUS D
HETEROPDDARKE FORHALIS
HETEROPODARKE LYONSI
PODARKE (LPIL)
PODARKE SP.E
PODARKEOPSIS LEVIFUSCINA
LUMfiRINERIDAE
LUHBRINERIDAE (LPIL)
LUHBRINERIDES DAY I
LUHBRINERIS (LPIL)
LUHBRINERIS LATREILLI
LUHBRINERIS SP.D
LUHBRINERIS SP.V
LUHBRINERIS VERRILLI
HAGELONIDAE
HA6EL0NA (LPIL)
HA6EL0NA SP.B
HAGELONA SP.C
HAGELONA SP.I
HALDAN1DAE
ASYCHIS EL0N6ATUS
AXIOTHELLA SP.A
BOGUEA ENIGHATICA
HALDANIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYIDAE
NEPHTYS PICTA
NEPHTYS SIHONI
NERE1DAE
CERATOCEPHAJLE OCULATA
CERATONEREIS (LPIL)
NEREIDAE (LPIL)
NEREIS (LPIL)
NEREIS HICROHHA
ONUPHIDAE
8I0PATM CltPREA
E-7
-------
TAXQNOHIC LISTING
TAXONONIC SPECIES LIST , 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1984
NOOREONUPHIS PALLIDULA
ONUPHIDAE (LPIL)
OPHELIIDAE
ARNANDIA HACULATA
OPHELIA OENTICULATA
OPHELIIDAE (LPIL)
TRAVISIA KOBSONAE
ORBINIIDAE ..
LEITOSCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
SCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
OWENIIDAE
OHENIA SP.A
OWENIIDAE (LPIL)
PARAONIDAE
ARICIDEA (LPIL)
ARICIDEA CERRUT1I
ARICIDEA PHILBINAE
ARICIDEA SP.A
ARICIDEA SP.E
ARICIDEA SP.H
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
ARICIDEA MASSI
CIRROPHORUS (LPIL)
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
LEVINSENIA GRACILIS
PARAONIDAE (LPIL)
PARAONIS PY60ENI6HATICA
PECTINARIIDAE
PECTINARIA 60ULDII
PHYLLODOCIDAE
ANAITIDES L0N6IPES
ETEONE LACTEA
EUHIDA SANGUINEA
6ENETYLLIS SP.A
HESIONURA SP.A
NYSTIDES BOREALIS
PARANAITIS SPECIOSA
PHYLLODOCE ARENAE
PHYLLODOCIDAE (LPIL)
PILAR6IDAE
ANCISTROSYLLIS HARTNANAE
LITOCORSA ANTENNATA
PILAR6IDAE (LPIL)
SI6AHBRA BASSI.
. SIGAHBRA TENTACULATA '
SYNELNIS ENIN6I
SVHELH1S KLAT71
PISIONIDAE .
PISIONE SP.A
E-8
-------
TAXQNOHIC LISTING
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
£PA-PENSA€OLA—SITE B—COLLECTED 'NOVEMBER 198i
8S38S8SS333SS&88SS33338883SSSS3SS88S8SSS3S3S3SSSSSSSSS8SSSSSSSSSSS3SSSSS333S3S:
POECILOCHAETIDAE
POECILOCHAETUS (LPIL)
P0LY60RDIIDAE
P0LV60RDIUS (LPIL)
f>OLVNOIOAE
HARhOTHOE (LPIL)
HARNOTHOE SP.B
NALN6RENIELLA SP.C
POLYNOIDAE (LPIL)
SABELLARIIDAE
SABELLARIA SP.A
SABELLIDAE
CHONE (LPIL)
EUCHONE (LPIL)
EUCHONE CF. INCOLOR
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
NE6AL0MNA BIOCULATUH
POTAMILLA (LPIL)
SABELlIIDAE (LPIL)
SACC0C1RRIDAE
SACCOCIRRUS SP.A
SERPULIDAE
HYDROIDES (LPIL)
HYDROIDES MICROTIS
HYDROIDES PROTULICQLA
PONATOCEROS AHERICANUS
PSEUDOVERMILIA OCCIDENTAL IS
SERPULA SP.A
SERPULIDAE (LPIL)
SERPULIDAE 6ENUS C
SI6ALI0NIDAE
SI6AL10N SP.A
SI6ALI0NIDAE (LPIL)
THALENESSA CF. SPINOSA
SPIONIDAE
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
DISPIO UNCINATA
LAONICE CIRRATA
MALACOCEROS (LPIL)
NALACOCEROS INDICUS
PARAPRIONQSPI0 PINNATA
POLYDORA CORNUTA
POLYDORA SOCIALIS
PRIONOSPIO(LPIL)
PRIONOSPIO CIRRIFERA
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
SCOLELEPIS SOUAHATA
SCOLELEPIS TEHANA
SP10 PETTIBQHEAE
E-9, •
-------
09/01/87
I338S83338S333S883388S3338
SPIONIDAE (LPIL)
SPIOPHANES mm
SPIOPHANES CF. HISSIONENSIS
SYLLIDAE
MANIA HELLFLEETENSIS
EURVSYLLIS TUBERCULATA
EXOGONE (LPIL)
EXOGONE ATLANT1GA
EI0E0NE DISPAR
EXOGONE LOWE I
ODONTOSYLLIS ENOPLA
OPISTHODONTA SP.A
PARAPIONOSYLLIS L0N6ICIRRATA
PIONOSYLLIS GESAE
PLAKOSYLLIS AUADR10CULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS (LPIL)
SPHAEROSYLLIS ACICULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEAE
SYLLIDAE (LPIL)
SYLLIDES FULVUS
TYPOSYLLIS AHICA
TEREBELLIDAE
LOINIA SP.A
POLYCIRRUS (LPIL)
POLYCIRRUS SP.F
POLYCIRRUS SP.I
TEREBELLIDAE (LPIL)
TRICHOBRANCHIDAE
TEREBELLIDES SP.A
TRICHOBRANCHIDAE (LPIL)
TRICHOBRANCHUS 6LACIALIS
ARTHROPODA (CRUSTACEA)
CRUSTACEA (LPIL)
AHPHIPODA
AhPHIPODA (LPIL)
AHPELISCIDAE
ANPELISCA (LPIL)
ANPELISCA AGASSIZI
AHPELISCA SP.A
ANPELISCA SP.C
ANPELISCA SP.L
ANPHILOCHIOAE
AHPHILOCHUS SP.C
6ITAMA CALITEMPLADO
AORIDAE
ACUM1WDEUT0PUS (LPIL)
ACUNiNODEUfOPUS SP.A
AORICAE (LPIL)
E-10
-------
TAXONQMIC LISTIM6
TAXONOMIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMER 1984
3SSS3S3SS33383333SS3S3S33S3S83333SS38S8S383S33S333S3SSSSS8SSSS3
AORIDAE 6ENUS B
LEHBOS (LPIL)
LEHBOS SHITHI
MICRODEUTOPUS HYERSI
ARI6ISSIDAE
AR6ISSA HAHATIPES
BATEIDAE
CARIHOBATEA CARINATA
CQROPHIIOAE
COROPHIUM (LPIL)
COROPHIUM ACHERUS1CUM
COROPHIUM ACUTUM
COROPHIUM SP.F
COROPHIUM SP.L
COROPHIUM SP.N
HAUSTORIIDAE
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS INTERMEDIUS
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS SP.B
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.B
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.C
ISHEIOAE
ISAEIDAE (LPIL)
ME6ANPH0PUS SP.A
PHOTIS (LPIL)
PHOTIS HELANICUS
PHOTIS SP.D
ISCHYROCERI0AE
CERAPUS SP.B
LILJEB0R61IDAE
LILJEBOR6IA (LPIL)
LILJEBORGIA SP.A
LISTRIELLA (LPIL)
LISTRIELLA SP.F
LISTRIELLA SP.G
LYSIANASSIDAE
HIPPONEDON (LPIL)
HIPPOMEDON SP.A
HIPPOMEDON SP.B
LYSIANASSA CUBENSIS
LYSIANASSIDAE (LPIL)
MELITIDAE
CERADOCUS SP.A
CERADOCUS SP.C
DULICHIELLA SP.B
ELASMOPUS (LPIL)
ELASNOPUS SP.C
ERIOPISA SP.B
HAERA (LPIL)
HAERA SP.D
E-ll
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTIN6
TAKONONIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
09/01/87
HELITIDAE (LPIL)
NEOHEGAHPHDPIDAE
NEOHEGANPHOPUS HIATUS
NE0NE6AMPH0PUS KALANI1
OEDICEROTIDAE
HONOCULODES NYEI
OEDICEROTIDAE (LPIL)
SYNCHELID1UH AHERICANUN
PHO XOCEPHALIDAE
NETHARPINA (LPIL)
NETHARPINA FLORIDANA
PLATYISCHNOPIDAE
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
PODOCERIDAE
POOOCERUS (LPIL)
PODOCERUS SP.B
SYN0P1IDAE
GAROSYRRHOE SP.B
TIRON (LPIL)
TIRON TRIOCELLATUS
TIRON TROPAKIS
CliHACEA
CUHACEA (LPIL)
BODOTRIIDAE
CYCLASPIS (LPIL)
CYCLASPIS SP.D
CYCLASPIS SP.O
CYCLASPIS UNICORNIS
DIASTYLIDAE
OXYUROSTYLIS (LPIL)
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.B
OXYUROSTYLIS 5P.C
NANNASTACIDAE
CAHPYLASPIS (LPIL)
CAHPYLASPIS SP.I
CAHPYLASPIS SP.L
CAHPYLASPIS SP.H
CAHPYLASPIS SP.O
CUHELLA (LPIL)
CUHELLA SP.6
CUHELLA SP.H
CUHELLA SP.I
DECAPOOA (NATANTIA)
DECAPODA NATANTIA (LPIL)
ALPHEIDAE
ALPHEISAE (LPIL)
ALPHEUS (LPIL)
ALPHEUS NORHANNI
HIPPOLYTIDAE
LATREUTES PARVULUS
E-12
-------
TA10N0HIC L1STIK6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
LUCIFERIDAE
LUCIFERIDAE GENUS A
PALAEItONIDAE
PALAENONIDAE (LPIL)
PASIPHAEIDAE
LEPTOCHELA (LPIL)
LEPTOCHELA PAPULATA
PROCESSIDAE
PROCESSA (LPIL)
PROCESSA HENPHILLI
SICVONIIDAE
SICYONIA (LPIL)
SICYONIA BREVIROSTRIS
SOLENOCERIDAE
SOLENOCERA (LPIL)
DECAPODA (REPTANTIA)
DECAPODA REPTANTIA (LPIL)
ALBUNEIOAE
ALBUNEA (LPIL)
ALBUNEA GIBBESII
CALAPPIDAE
CYCLOES BAIRDII
HEPATUS EPHELITICUS
DORIPPIDAE
ETHUSA HASCARONE AMERICANA
DR0H1IDAE
DROMIDIA ANT ILLENSIS
HYPOCONCHA ARCUATA
60NEPLACIDAE
GLYPTOPLAX SNITHII
LEUCOSIIDAE
EBALIA (LPIL)
SPELOEOPHORUS PONTIFER
HAJIDAE
BATRACHONOTUS FRA60SUS
HEHUS CR1STULIPES
INACHOIDES FORCEPS
HAJIDAE (LPIL)
PAGURIDAE
PA6URIDAE (LPIL)
PARTHENOPIDAE
HESORHOEA SEISPINOSA
PARTNENOPE GRANULATA
PARTHENOPIDAE (LPIL)
P0RCELLAN1DAE
PORCELLANA SAYANA
PORTUNIDAE
OVALIPES (LPIL)
PORTUNIDAE (LPIL)
E-13
-------
TAIONONIC LIST1N6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
333SS333SSS3333S3333=33=E=Sr3333383SS333333333S333333333333333S333SS333S3SE3333
RANIN1DAE
RANILIA SP.A
1SOPODA
ANTHURIDAE
ANTHURIDAE (LPIL)
APANTHURA NA6NIF1CA
PTILANTHURA SP.B
PTILANTHURA TRICARINA
IDOTEIDAE
EDOTEA (LPIL)
EDOTEA LYONS1
SEROLIDAE
SEROUS N6RAYI
LEPTOSTRACA
NEBALIIDAE
NEBALIA BIPES
HYSIDACEA
NYSIDAE
AMATHIMYSIS BRATTE6ARDI
ANCHIALINA TYPICA
BOUHANIELLA ILPIL)
BOWHAHIELLA PORTQRICENS1S
MYSIDAE (LPIL)
NYSIDOPSIS FURCA
OSTRACODA
OSTRACODA (LPIL)
CYLINDROLEBERIDIDAE
ANBOLEBERIS AMERICANA
ASTEROPELLA MACLAU6HLINAE
ASTER0PTERY6I0N OCULITRISTIS
SYNASTEROPE (LPIL)
OSTRACODA FANILY H
OSTRACODA FANILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY 1
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FANILY J
OSTRACODA FANILY J
PHILONEDIDAE
HARBAHSUS PAUCICHELATUS
PSEUDOPHILOHEDES ANBON
RUTIDERflAT1DAE
RUTI DERMA DARBYI
SARSIELLIDAE
EUSARSIELLA (LPIL)
EUSARSIELLA DISPARALIS
EUSARSIELLA ELOFSONI
EUSARSIELLA SIGACANTHA
EUSARSIELLA PILLIPOLLICIS
TRACHYLEftERIDIDAE
ACTINOCYTHEREIS SP.A
E-14
-------
TAXONOHIC L1STIH6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVENBER 1986
SS33338883833333333333S3S33S33S3S338888SSS3SS3SSSS&333388SSS3
ACT1NOCYTHERE1S SP.C
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.B
TANAIDACEA
TANAIDACEA (LPIL)
APSEUDIDAE
APSEUDES (LPIL)
APSEUDES PROPINOUUS
APSEUDES SP.H
(CALL IAPSEUDI DAE
KALLIAPSEUDES (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.A
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.C
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.D
LEPTOCHELIDAE
LEPTOCHELIA SP.D
NOTOTANAIDAE
TANAISSUS SP.A
BRACHIOPODA
BRACHIOPODA (LPIL)
CEPHALOCHORDATA
LEPTOCARDII
BRANCHIOSTOHIDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA (LPIL)
BRANCH1OSTOHA BERHUDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA FLORIDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA L0N6IROSTRUM
BRANCHIOSTOHA VIR6INIAE
CNIDARIA
ACTINIARIA
ACTINIARIA (LPIL)
ANTHOZOA (PENNATULACEA)
PENNATULACEA (LPIL)
ECHINODERHATA
ASTERQIDEA
ASTEROIDEA (LPIL)
ECHINOIDEA
ECHINOIDEA (LPIL)
NELLITIDAE
ENCOPE ABERRANS
HOLOTHUROIDEA
PHYLLOPHORIDAE
STOLUS C06NATUS
SYNAPTIDAE
LEPTOSYNAPTA CRASSIPATINA
OPHIUROIDEA
OPHIUROIDEA (LPIL)
AHPHIURIDAE
AHPHIODIA (LPIL)
E-15
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTIN6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LI5T
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
3S38338333S33388SS3SS3SS3333333SS:
isssssssssss:
09/01/87
AHPHIODIA TRYCHNA
AHPHIURA (LP1L)
AHPHIURA FIBULATA
AHPHIURIDAE (LPIL)
HEHICHORDATA
ENTEROPNEUSTA
BALANOBLQSSUS AURANTIACUS
HOLLUSCA
6ASTR0P0DA
GASTROPODA (LPIL)
ACTEDCINIDAE
ACTEOCINA BIDENTATA
ACTEOCINA CANDEI
ACTEDCINIDAE (LPIL)
ACTEONIDAE
ACTEON PUNCTOSTRIATUS
ATYIDAE
ATYS (LPIL)
ATYS SANDERSONI
CAECIOAE
CAECUM (LPIL)
CAECUH CUBITATUH
CAECUM IHBRICATUH
CAECUH JOHNSONI
CAECUM PULCHELLUH
CAECUH SP.A
CAECUH SP.C
CANCELLARIIDAE
CANCELLARIIDAE (LPIL)
CERITHI1DAE
SEILA ADAMSI
COLUHBELLIDAE
ANACHIS LAFRESNAYI
ANACHIS OBESA
HITRELLA LUNATA
NASSARINA 6LYPTA
CONIDAE
CONUS FLORIDANUS FLQRIDENSIS
CREPIDULIDAE
CALYPTRAEA CENTRALIS
CREPIDULA (LPIL)
CREPIDULA CONVEXA
CYCLOSTEHATIDAE
ARENE TRICARINATA
EPITONIIDAE
EPITONIUM (LPIL)
HARG1NELLIDAE
HARGINELLA (LPIL)
NAR6INELLA SP.C
E-16
-------
TAIOMMIC LISTIRS
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
SBBSSB333S3S3SS8333S3338SS3S3S333SS3aS338S3aa88SS383SS83S38S3SS3338SSS33SU33333
HELAMELLIDAE
HELANELLIDAE (LPIL)
NISO AE6LEES
STROMBIFOfHIIS (LPIL)
STRONBIFOfMIS AURICINCTUS
NATICIDAE
NATICA PUSILLA
NATICIDAE (LPIL)
POLINICES LACTEUS
SIGATICA SEHISULCATA
OLIVIDAE
OLIVELLA (LPIL)
OLIVELLA ADELAE
OLIVELLA FLORALIA
PYRAHIDELLIDAE
TURBONILLA (LPIL)
TURBONILLA CONRADI
TROCHIOAE
TROCHIDAE 5ENUS C
TURRIDAE
CRASSISPIRA TAHPAENSIS
CRYOTURRIS CITRONELLA
INODRILLIA SP.A
KURTZIELLA RUBELLA
TURRIDAE (LPIL)
TURRIDAE 6ENUS K
TURRITELLIDAE
TURRITELLA ACROPORA
TURRITELLIDAE (LPIL)
VITRINELLIDAE
VITRINELLA HELICOIDEA
VITRINELLIDAE (LPIL)
NUDIBRANCHIA
NUDIBRANCHIA (LPIL)
PELECYPODA
PELECYPODA (LPIL)
ARCIDAE
ANADARA (LPIL)
ANADARA TRANSVERSA
CARDIIDAE
CARDIIDAE (LPIL)
LAEVICARDIUH (LPIL)
CARDIT1DAE
PLEURONERIS TRIDENTATA
CORBULIDAE
CORBULA (LPIL)
VARICORBULA OPERCULATA
CRASSATELLIDAE
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
E-17
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAKONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
SS333SSS3S333333S3S3SSS2S3SS33SS3SSS3SS3S33S3335SS33S333S
CUSPIDARIIDAE
CARDIOHYA ORNATISSIHA
6LYCYHERIDIDAE
GLYCYHERIS UNDATA
HIATELLIDAE
HIATELLA SP.B
LEPTOMIOAE
HVSELLA (LPIL)
LINIDAE
LIHATULA (LPIL)
LIHATULA SP.A
LUCINIOAE
LIN6A AMIANTU5
LIN6A PENSYLVANICA
LUCINA SOHBRERENSIS
LUCINA SP.B
LUCINA SP.D
LUCINIOAE (LPIL)
LYONSIIDAE
LYONSIA (LPIL)
LYONSIA SP.A
HESOOESHATIDAE
ERVILIA CONCENTRICA
HYTILIDAE
CRENELLA DIVARICATA
NUCULIDAE
NUCIILA AE6EENIS
PANDORIDAE
PANDORA (LPIL)
PANDORA BUSHIANA
PANDORA TRILINEATA
PANDORIDAE (LPIL)
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
SENELIDAE
SEHELE BELLASTRIATA
SEHELE NUCULOIDES
SENELIDAE (LPIL)
TELLINIDAE
STRI6ILLA (LPIL)
TELLINA (LPIL)
TELLINA AEQUISTRIATA
TELLINA LISTERI
TELLINA TEIANA
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
THRACIIDAE
BUSHIA SP.A
THYASIRIDAE
THVASIRA TR1SINUATA
E-18
-------
TAX0MM1C LISTING
TAKONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PEHSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1986
88388888888838838888383338333333833888388383888888333388388333833333238833333833
UN6ULINIDAE
01PLQD0NTA PUNCTATA
VENERIDAE
CHIONE (LPIL)
CHIME INTAPUftPUftEA
CHIONE LATILIRATA
GOULDIA CERINA
PITAR (LPIL)
PITAR FULNINATUS
PITAR SP.C
VENERIDAE (LPIL)
VERTICORDIIDAE
VERTICORDIA ORNATA
POLYPLACOPHORA
POLYPLACOPHORA (LPIL)
SCAPHDPODA
SCAPHOPODA (LPIL)
DENTALIIDAE
DENTALIUH (LPIL)
DENTALIUN SP.H
5IPH0NDDENTALIIDAE
CADULUS (LPIL)
CAOULUS A6ASS12I1
CADULUS TETRODON
PH0R0N1DA
PHORONIS (LPIL)
PLATYHELNINTHES
TURBELLARIA
TURBELLARIA (LPIL)
RHYNCHOCOELA
RHYNCNOCOELA (LPIL)
SIPUNCULA
SIPUNCULA (LPIL)
ASPIDOSIPHONIDAE
ASPIDOSIPHON (LPIL)
ASPIDOSIPHON ALBUS
ASPIDOSIPHON HUELLERI
60LFIN6IIDAE
PHASCOLION STROHBI
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
SIPUNCULA FAHILY C
SIPUNCULIDAE
SIPUNCULUS NUDUS
E-19
-------
SITE B APRIL 1987
Biological Community Parameters
Biomass Data
Taxonomic List
E-20
-------
SITE B
BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY PARAMETERS
EPA—PENSACULA, FLORIDA
Sample Type: MACROFAUNA
Sample Date (YY/MM/DD): 87/04/24
Sample Area (sq. m.): 0.0079
STATION TOTAL MEAN TAXA TOTAL NO. MEAN STANDARD
NUMBER TAKA PER REPL. INDIVIDUALS DENSITY DEVIATION H' J' D
001
135
33.8
1146
9470
3360
3.91
0.80
19.02
002
168
46.6
2022
17063
8068
3.88
0.76
21.94
003
158
37.0
1571
13257
6226
3.77
0.74
21.33
004
171
46.2
1996
16843
10427
3.85
0.75
22.37
005
158
43.4
2161
18236
11166
3.62
0.72
20.45
006
160
40.0
1442
12168
5848
3.93
0.77
21.86
007
171
41.2
2102
17738
15996
3.51
0.68
22.22
008
193
54.6
2818
23780
8772
3.89
0.74
24.17
009
144
36.4
1745
14725
7289
3.25
0.65
19.16
010
164
40.3
1616
13637
3624
3.76
0.74
22.06
Oil
149
39.2
1282
10818
4327
4.00
0.80
20.68
012
142
40.0
1071
11297
5062
3.97
0.80
20.21
013
165
44.8
1392
11746
3643
4.24
0.83
22.66
014
164
45.7
2119
17881
3996
3.77
0.74
21.28
015
168
40.2
1617
13645
4657
3.82
0.75
22.60
016
153
37.1
1329
11215
3233
3.83
0.76
21.13
017
205
56.0
2641
22286
7577
3.94
0.74
25.89
018
184
47.0
2294
19358
8322
3.82
0.73
23.65
019
171
44.4
2005
16919
8736
3.66
0.71
22.36
020
162
36.7
1328
11206
6117
3.98
0.78
22.39
E-21
-------
Wet weight blooass
for
Pftni4cols, Florida,
fi Site,
, April
1987.
All wolghts
in grama.
STATION TUON
KP A
REP 1
KP C
KP 1
KP I
KP F
REP 6
REP N
REP I
KP J
KP K
KP L
KP H
KP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PHI
ANKUM
0.001
1.004
O.Olf
0.010
0.0S4
0.019
0.013
0.022
0.009
0.018
0.011
0.014
0.009
0.009
0.012
0.212
PTII
AAM9P0M
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.040
O.OOS
0.002
0.002
O.OOS
O.OOS
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.011
0.09S
PFBI
HOLLUSCA
0.000
0.401
0.002
0.009
0.019
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.014
0.003
O.OOS
0.002
0.0S8
0.047
0.008
0.134
Pfll
rhinqbeuata
0.040
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.021
0.001
0.034
0.000
0.001
0.012
0.000
0.023
0.001
O.OOS
0.001
0.147
*11
HIOEUJKOUS
0.001
0.00*
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.008
0.001
0.013
TOTAL
O.MS
0.0(4
0.021
0.023
0.123
0.031
0.074
0.027
0.029
0.0S9
0.021
0.042
0.033
0.071
O.OU
0.441
STAT l(M TAION
REP A
IEP 1
KP C
KP 0
KP (
KP F
KP 6
ID H
REP 1
KP J
REP K
REP L
KP 1
REPI
KP 0
TOTALS
PFI2
ANSI I DA
9.OH
0.023
0.014
0.049
0.047
0.033
0.014
0.020
0.0S4
O.OS3
0.02S
0.024
0.004
0.020
0.013
0.393
pfb2
AAfHfEOPQM
0.008
0.001
0.004
0.01S
0,001
O.OOS
0.004
O.OOS
0.024
0.008
0.092
0.018
0.002
0.002
0.003
0. Ill
rm
HOLLUSCA
0.023
1.024
0.003
0.043
0.006
0.010
0.010
0.013
0.009
0.067
0.001
0.013
0.003
0.024
0.004
0.283
PFB2
IOIIRSUMTA
0.001
0.001
0.011
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
0.009
0.000
O.OOO
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
0.02B
PFM
fllSCELLAKOUS
0.001
0.006
0.001
0.004
0.018
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.068
TOTAL
0.0)4
0.068
0.033
0.114
0.094
0.034
0.019
0.040
0.049
0.134
0.028
0.04S
0.019
0.030
0.024
0.887
STATION TAION
IEP A
01
KP C
KP 0
KP I
REP F
Rff 6
REP H
REP I
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP n
KP A
REP 0
TOTALS
PFU
AMCLIDA
0.028
0.017
0.012
0.017
0.037
0.007
0.012
0.043
0.016
0.027
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.018
0.210
PFBS
wllusca
0.004
0.004
0.001
o.tot
0.006
0.003
0.008
O.OS3
0.249
0.008
0.9*1
0.431
0.004
0.012
0.002
0.928
PFBS
EQHROOEHATA
0.013
0.047
0.000
0.001
0.000
O.OOS
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.024
0.014
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.111
PFBS
nsmiAffiPS
O.OOS
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.0S3
0.002
>.004
0.007
0.010
0.007
0.013
0.004
0.009
0.133
TOTAL
0.092
0.074
0.017
0.127
0.044
0.014
0.074
0.083
9.292
0.044
0.030
0.473
O.OSS
0.030
0.029
1.412
STIIIOI TAW
UP A
rep 1
KP C
KP 0
KP C
REP F
REP S
REP H
REP 1
REP i
REP K
REP L
REP N
REP 1
KP 0
TOTALS
PFB4
AMEL1EM
0.008
0.111
0.041
0.013
0.034
0.030
0.008
O.OS8
0.018
0.022
0.014
0.023
0.011
0.01?
0.021
0.363
PFB4
AftTttQPOM
O.OOI
0.001
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.004
0.014
0.010
0.003
0.002
0.008
0.004
O.OOS
0.001
0.001
0.071
PFB4
(QLLUSCA
0.006
0.003
0.010
0.024
0.040
0.017
0.032
O.OIS
O.OOS
0.004
0.009
0.003
0.007
0.002
0.003
0.198
PF84
EOHMKfiftAIA
0.00!
0.001
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.001
0.033
PFU
R18XLUUC0US
9.009
0.001
O.OOS
0.011
0.001
0.001
0.010
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.007
0.004
0.001
0.074
TOTAL
0.023
0.021
0.073
0.033
0.101
0.072
0.113
0.071
0.034
O.OSS
0.038
0.034
0.028
0.032
0.027
0.761
STATION WON
KP A
REP 1
KP C
KP B
KP {
REP F
REP fi
REP H
REP 1
REP 1
REP K
REP L
kp n
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFBS
ANNELIBA
O.OOS
0.001
0.014
0.004
O.Olf
0.083
0.008
0.002
O.OSI
0.013
0.034
0.021
0.072
0.021
0.014
0.307
PFBS
A8TKB0PQIA
0.009
0.004
0.003
0.004
O.OS9
0.019
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.008
0.003
0.013
0.003
0.004
0.013
0.130
PFBS
wllusca
0.147
0.007
0.011
0.019
0.028
0.037
0.033
0.020
0.021
0.022
1.638
0.041
0.094
0.029
0.023
2.210
PFBS
KHItfUEMATA
0.001
0.001
0.001
. 0.000
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.018
0.004
0.000
0.001
0.024
0.000
0.062
PF83
HISCEUAKOUS
0.540
0.001
0.004
o.ooo
O.OOS
0.011
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.037
0.611
TOTAL
0.721
0.022
0.0S7
0.027
0.090
0.131
0.0)2
0.024
0.0S7
0.043
1.703
0.079
0.123
0.071
0.091
3.340
STATION TAION
KP A
RD B
KP C
KP S
KP i
KP F
REP fi
REP H
REP I
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP n
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
*16
AttLIBA
0.007
0.012
0.01S
0.012
0.013
0.017
0.010
0.017
0.031
0.018
0.019
0.012
0.013
O.OOS
0.011
0.212
PFU
AtTKUPOOA
O.OOS
O.OOS
0.002
0.008
0.004
0.007
0.000
0.002
0.011
0.002
0.007
O.OOS
O.OOS
0.002
0.013
0.072
PF14
flOLLQSCA
0.027
0.001
0.002
0.012
0.090
0.077
0.001
O.OOS
0.004
0.002
0.0S1
0.029
0.019
0.001
0.008
0.247
PfR6
EOURQKRMTA
0.004
0.000
0.011
0.000
0.011
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.041
PFM
IUSCE1LAK0US
0.001
0.024
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.004
O.OU
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.073
TOTAL
0.044
0.042
0.029
o.on
0.084
0.104
0.014
0.024
0.047
0.028
0.071
0.037
0.038
0.013
0.037
0.6*9
STATION Til OR
REP A
REP 1
KP C
KP 0
REP C
REP F
REP fi
REP H
REP 1
KP J
REP 1
REP L
REP H
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFI7
AKIIDA
O.OB
0.008
0.010
0.01S
0.014
0.012
0.029
0.021
O.OS8
0.131
0.012
0.044
0.014
0.006
0.014
0.319
PFI7
MTBOPQM
o.ooa
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.014
0.007
O.OOS
0.020
0.013
0.009
O.OOS
0.010
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.107
PFI7
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.111
0.003
0.011
0.019
0.314
0.044
0.004
O.OOS
0.003
0.030
0.027
0.8<3
PFB7
EOHKBEMATA
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.007
0.013
0.001
0.000
0.008
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.008
0.000
0.042
PFI7
IISgllAtfOlH
0.022
0.01S
0.012
O.OOS
0.012
0.002
0.011
O.OU
0.004
0.010
0.012
0.01S
0.004
O.OOS
0.004
0.143
TOTAL
0.071
0.027
0.0S4
0.029
0.174
0.023
0.034
0.084
0.392
0.214
O.OSS
0.070
0.031
0.049
0.049
1.S38
station tmn
BP A
KP 1
KP C
0
REP I
RfP F
KP i
KP R
REP I
REP J
KP 1
REP L
rep n
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFB8
AMELIOA
0.011
0.0S9
0.081
0.028
0.014
0.0S4
0.0S8
0.040
0.022
0.014
0.730
0.044
0.077
0.034
0.022
1.780
PFM
AATttOPCtt
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.010
0.013
0.009
0.092
PFM
flOLLBSCA
0.044
0.042
0.074
0.190
0.037
0.044
0.047
0.034
0.034
O.OS9
0.072
0.034
0.124
0.113
0.014
1.012
PFM
EQUROIEKATA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.401
0.001
0.017
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.011
PFM
¦ISCEUAKQUS
0.001
0.002
0.010
O.OOS
0.001
O.OOS
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.013
0.007
0.034
TOTAL
0.071
0.108
0.174
0.224
0.034
0.111
0.091
0.081
0.084
0.043
0.124
0.107
0.214
0.202
0.033
2.4)1
E-22
-------
station run
V *
kp I
tO c
0 0
to t
to f
to 6
REP K
IE? 1
KP J
REP 1
REP L
to N
KP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
Pft9
MCLIM
0.044
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.011
0.011
0.009
0.008
0.009
0.003
0.011
0.008
0.014
0.005
0.199
*»9
AfeTMOPQM
4.004
0.003
o.ooo
O.OOA
0.011
0.001
0.003
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.0*4
0.006
0.009
0.001
0.071
*19
NUOSCA
0.042
0.002
4. on
4.001
0.007
0.014
O.OM
0.000
0.004
0.411
0.001
0.020
0.004
0.179
0.002
0.404
*19
CWMOOMri
0.002
0.003
0.010
0.008
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.029
0.011
0.001
0.003
0.077
Pfl9
NISCEUAK0US
0.010
0.002
0.007
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.009
0.641
0.002
0.004
0.000
0.007
0.002
0.014
0.003
0.717
TOTAL
0.104
0.019
0.121
0.026
0.034
0.030
0.047
0.471
0.019
0.029
( Oil
0.071
0.031
0.219
0.014
1.440
standi run
W 1
KF 1
KP C
to 1
KF £
to F
to fi
REP H
REP 1
KP J
Kb1 K
KP L
rep n
KP N
IEP 0
TOTUS
*110
ANKIIM
0.013
0.014
0.021
0.028
0.019
0.049
0.021
0.014
0.006
0.012
0.012
0.001
0.010
0.008
0.049
0.281
*110
AITHR8PQBA
0.010
0.004
0.002
4.009
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.002
0.004
0.009
0.003
0.001
0.009
0.004
O.OM
0.070
*110
H0UU5CI
0.079
0.001
0.023
0.022
0.271
0.016
0.309
0.033
0.022
0.030
0.021
0.009
0.007
0.019
0.090
0.914
*110
ECHIttKMITA
3,000
0.000
0.000
0.001
o.oe)
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.008
0.092
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
9.073
*110
msc&uueous
4.004
0.001
0.004
4.001
4.003
o.ooi
0.006
0.002
6.001
0.002
0.009
0.002
0.000
O.OOl
0.001
0.042
total
S.I02
0.034
0.090
0.062
0.309
0.069
0.339
0.094
0.034
0.061
0.093
0.017
0.023
0.033
0.103
4.383
sunn mm
KP 1
KP 1
KP c
to»
to t
to F
KP fi
KP H
REP 1
REP J
REP 1
REP L
REP 1
KP I
REP 0
TOTALS
*m
MffllM
0.010
0.09*
0.014
0.019
0.012
0.011
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.009
0.008
0.004
0.010
0.017
0.044
0.248
*in
AITB0PQM
0.009
0.002
0.009
0.001
0.011
0.001
2.009
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.009
2.072
*m
0.003
0.043
1.031
0.013
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.014
0.024
0.009
0.002
0.014
0.471
0.299
*iu
EOiiuKmia
0.000
0.001
4.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.044
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.094
*iu
niscauwoos
0.001
0.009
0.009
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.009
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.009
0.001
0.004
0.092
TOTAL
0.021
0.134
0.059
0.033
0.034
0.024
2.069
0.017
0.015
0.031
0.041
0.019
0.029
0.031
0.132
2.681
STATION TAIQN
KP A
hp i
tfp c
REP 1
to E
to f
KP fi
to H
REP 1
REP i
KP I
KP I
IEP n
REP 1
KP 0
TOTALS
*iii
MCLIM
0.009
0.072
0.017
0.010
0.021
0.014
0.022
0.021
0.008
0.009
0.089
0.014
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.248
*112
MI08POM
0.00*
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.019
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.039
*112
NQLUJ5CA
0.007
0.020
4.013
0.034
0.004
O.Olt
0.004
0.009
0.008
0.001
0.009
0.031
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.194
*112
EoiinoEmTi
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.010
0.003
0.000
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.026
*112
MISCELLANEOUS
0.001
0.004
4.001
0.002
0.017
0.002
0.010
0.0O4
0.938
0.020
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.008
1DTM.
0.020
0.049
0.034
0.049
0.049
0.034
0.031
0.047
0.960
0.027
0.120
0.090
0.000
o.ooo
0.000
1.479
STATION TAiON
KP 4
KP 1
KPC
kp i
lift
to F
REP fi
KP N
IEP I
KP J
KP t
KP L
REP H
REP 1
KP 0
TOTALS
*111
AOELIH
0.001
0.011
0.020
0.013
0.012
0.022
0.002
O.OIS
0.008
0.039
0.023
0.028
0.010
0.014
0.007
0.2)4
*11)
A8NUPQUI
0.004
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.006
0.009
0.016
0.007
0.013
0.003
0.020
0.002
*.003
0.093
*113
NLLUSCA
0.040
0.04?
0.979
4.012
0.013
0.047
0.009
0.019
0.053
0.004
0.006
0.014
0.024
0.003
0.033
0.895
*113
COUttSClNATA
0.000
0.001
0.000
4.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.019
*113
RISCEUAKOUS
0.004
0.004
0.022
0.002
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.032
0.021
0.001
0.113
NT*
0.094
0.064
0.419
4.030
0.031
0.063
0.014
0.037
0.088
0.095
0.048
0.091
0.087
0.044
0.043
1.354
STATIQi run
REP 1
KP 1
KP C
KP 1
KP E
KP F
KP 6
KP H
KP 1
KP J
KP K
KP L
KP n
REP »
KP 0
TOTALS
*114
ANKLIN
0.036
0.017
0.019
0.034
0.008
0.050
0.037
' 0.023
0.017
0.030
0.018
0.020
0.029
0.015
0.044
O.W
*114
A8THHPQM
0.011
0.003
0.009
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.002
0.003
0.009
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.072
*114
MOLLUSC!
0.079
0.060
0.010
0.034
0.032
0.048
0.018
0.010
0.024
0.019
0.021
0.019
0.011
0.020
0.047
0.444
*114
EOUttOOMTA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.026
O.OOO
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.018
0.019
0.000
0.000
0.014
0.001
0.080
*114
MSCELLAK0US
0.004
0.006
0.001
0.132
0.001
0.002
0.088
0.019
0.006
0.002
0.007
0.004
0.009
0.005
0.010
0.292
TOTAL
0.131
0.087
0.036
0.232
0.048
0.112
0.145
0.096
0.093
0.067
0.062
0.046
0.048
0.056
0.104
1.289
SIAT10N TAIOI
IEP A
KP 8
to c
KP I
KP E
REP F
KP 6
REP H
KP 1
KP J
KP t
KP I
KP <1
KP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
*115
AMEIIDA
0.019
0.008
0.023
0.015
9.016
0.033
0.019
0.019
0.008
0.045
0.012
0.008
0.022
0.023
0.082
0.392
*115
ARTU0P8M
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.028
0.003
0.004
0.006
0.004
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.020
0.087
*115
R0LUJSCA
0.032
0.027
0.003
4.021
0.067
0.029
14.211
0.025
0.014
0.004
0.003
0.017
0.008
0.015
0.021
14.495
*115
CttlMSOMTA
0.001
0.014
0.009
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.039
*115
HISCELUUEOUS
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.001
0.006
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.047
TOTAL
0.099
0.091
0.033
0.041
0.117
0.084
14.236
0.052
0.043
0.054
0.020
0.031
0.039
0.043
0.129
15.020
STATION TAIOi
KP A
KP 1
KP C
REP 1
REP E
REP f
KP fi
REP H
IEP I
REP J
KP K
REP I
KP H
KP 1
KP 0
TOTALS
*114
ARKLIM
0.021
0.012
0.022
0.021
0.006
0.030
0.023
0.014
0.014
0.024
0.018
4.006
0.012
0.028
0.007
0.798
*114
mrmsnu
0.003
O.OOl
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.012
4.009
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.010
0.008
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.074
*114
kuusca
0.023
0.021
0.012
0.010
0.098
0.034
0.021
0.073
0.094
0.030
0.006
0.009
0.009
0.107
0.019
0.482
*114
ECHIMBCUATA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
4.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.010
0.001
O.OOl
0.001
0.024
*114
IISCELUK0US
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.246
0.009
0.005
0.003
0.274
TOTAL
0.048
0.035
0.041
0.034
0.070
0.080
4.093
0.092
0.073
0.059
0.044
0.279
0.029
0.144
0.033
1.112
E-23
-------
STATICM HIM
UP A
ttP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP 1
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
Pf B17
wxaiw
0.014
0.080
O.OB
0.012
0.037
0.021
0.029
0.028
0.042
0.022
0.011
0.024
0.021
0.018
0.013
0.413
Pfll7
MTttOPOM
0.003
0.001
0.009
0.009
O.OOl
0.002
0.004
0.007
0.012
0.033
0.003
0.012
0.029
0.003
0.014
0.131
*11?
nuuscA
0.044
0.143
0.049
0.010
0.410
O.Oil
0.142
0.070
0.090
0.039
0.039
0.108
0.147
0.013
0.049
1.433
Pf 117
ECHIMOOCMTA
0.001
0.001
0.001
1.001
O.OOl
0.001
0.001
O.OOl
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.123
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.139
Pf 117
iiscauwous
0.00)
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.009
0.008
0.002
0.089
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.014
0.001
0.020
0.003
0.147
TOTAL
0.091
0.233
0.099
0.033
0.4SS
0.037
0.198
0.193
0.147
0.097
0.033
0.213
0.702
0.037
0.102
2.307
STATION TftlQI
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
KP L
REP H
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
frill
AttCUOA
0.019
0.018
0.024
0.023
0.008
0.034
0.017
0.013
0.034
0.071
0.049
0.017
0.031
0.014
0.044
0.440
Pflll
AITttflMM
0.003
0.013
0.009
0.002
O.OOl
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.021
0.011
0.003
0.004
0.017
0 003
0.093
Pfll8
MLLUSCA
0.003
0.029
0.002
O.OOf
0.001
0.004
0.009
0.023
0.030
0.041
0.023
0.004
0.044
0.020
0.003
0.249
Pflll
ECHWOCRMTA
0,004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
¦>.001
0.233
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.873
0.001
1.132
pflll
MSCEUAKOUS
0.001
0.003
0.014
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.002
4.004
0.001
0.003
O.OOl
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.044
TOTAL
0.032
0.044
0.049
0.034
0.012
0.074
0.028
0.047
¦). 090
0.349
0.089
0.024
0.012
0.929
0.073
2.002
STATION TAIU
HP A
REP I
REP C
REP I
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP N
ttP 1
REP i
REP t
REP L
REP It
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
Pfllf
AKLIBA
0.047
0.037
0.024
0.023
0.033
0.030
0.043
0,020
0.003
0.033
0.027
0.032
0.038
0.020
0.042
0.314
Pfll9
AftTMOPOfiA
0.006
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.023
0.009
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.008
0.003
0.019
0.032
0.003
0.018
0.141
Pftlt
flOLLUSCA
0.002
0.010
0.001
0.014
0.022
0.003
0.029
0.020
0.004
0.031
0.004
0.023
0.|>10
0.001
0.003
0.181
Pfllf
UMIM»»IATA
17.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.014
0.000
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.003
0.011
0.011
17.032
Pfllf
MSCELLAtfOUS
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.021
0.008
0.004
0.003
0.000
0.043
0.004
0.003
0.032
0.001
0.004
0.143
TOTAL
17.039
0.074
0.032
0.049
0.129
0.031
0.079
0.042
0.010
0.120
0.041
0.097
0.114
0.034
0.080
11.033
STATION TIION
HP A
ft£P 1
REP C
REP I
SEP E
REP F
REP 8
IEP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP I
REP II
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PflTO
ANNELIDA
0.002
0.019
0.023
0.032
0.038
0.009
0.041
0.010
0.034
0.022
0.033
0.004
o.oia
0.073
0.019
0.470
Pf 120
AATttOPOBA
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.040
0.008
0.014
O.OOl
0.030
0.003
0.007
0.009
0.003
0.022
0.004
0.144
Pf 120
NOLIUSCA
0.023
17.307
0.004
0.031
0.002
0.001
0.032
0.011
0.028
0.030
0.013
0.112
0.010
0.012
0.004
17.721
Pfl20
EDIIIOOEmTA
0,000
0.001
0.009
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.017
Pf 120
RISCELLAtfOUS
0.002
0.003
0.031
0.007
0.043
0.000
0.013
0.024
0.024
0.004
0.020
0.003
0.003
0.018
0.002
0.199
TOTAL
0.034
17.333
0.073
0.112
0.124
0.018
0.121
0.041
0.119
0.042
0.074
0.198
0.033
0.127
0.028
18.321
E-24
-------
TAXOIIOMIC L1ST1NB
rAlONOMC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
'PA-PEHSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
ANNELIDA
HIRUDINEA
HIRUD1NEA (LPIL) *
QL1WCHAETA
0LI60CHAETA (LPIL)
POLYCHAETA
ANPHARETIDAE
AHPHARETE SP.A
ANPHARETIDAE (LPIL)
ISOLDA PULCHELLA
SABELLIDES SP.A
AHPHINOMDAE
PARAWHIWME SP.B
APHRODITIDAE
APHR06ENIA SP.A
CAPITELLIDAE
CAPITELLIDAE (LPIL)
HASTOBRANCHUS VARIABILIS
NEDIOHASTUS (LPIL)
HEDIOHASTUS CALIFORNIENSIS
NOTONASTUS (LPIL)
CHAETQPTERIDAE
CHAETOPTERIDAE (LPIL)
HESOCHAETOPTERUS (LPIL)
SPIOCHAETOPTERUS OCULATUS
CHRYSOPETALIDAE
BHANANIA HETEROSETA
PALEANOTUS SP.A
CIRRATULIDAE
CAULLERIELLA CF. ALATA
CAULLERIELLA SP.A
CHAETOZONE (LPIL)
CIRRATULIDAE (LPIL)
THARYX CF. ANNULOSUS
DORVILLEIDAE
DORVILLEIDAE (LPIL)
PETTIBONEIA DUDFURCA
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
SCHISTOHERINEOS PECTINATA
EULEPETHIDAE
6RUBEULEPIS (LPIL)
EUNICIDAE
EUNICE VITTATA
EUNICIDAE (LPIL)
LYSIDICE SP.B
HARPHYSA SAN&UINEA
FLABELLIGERIDAE
FLABELLIGERIDAE (LPIL)
"LPIL - Lowest Practicable
Identification Level GLYCERIDAE
6LYCERA (LPIL)
E-25
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTIM6
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PEMSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
SSS335333S35SS3S33SSS3S333SSS33S33S333SS3SS333353SS353S3SSSS3333SS3S3SSS3S3SS33
ELYCERA AMERICANA
6LYCERA SP.A
60NIADIDAE
60NIADIDES CAROLINAE
HESIONIOAE
HESIONIDAE (LPIL)
HESIONIOAE GENUS 0
HETEROPODARKE FORMALIS
HETEROPODARKE LYONSI
POOARKEOPSIS LEVIFUSCINA
LUHBRIHERIDAE
LUHBRINERIDES DAYI
LUHBRINERIS (LPIL)
LliHBRINERIS LATRE1LLI
LUHBRINERIS SP.D
LUHBRINERIS SP.V
LUHBRINERIS VERRILLI
HA6EL0NIDAE
HAGELONA (LPIL)
HAGELONA SP.B
HAGELONA SP.C
HALDANIDAE
AXIOTHELLA SP.A
B06UEA ENI6HATICA
B06UEA SP.A
HALDANIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYIDAE
NEPHTYIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYS PICTA
NEPHTYS SIHONI
HEREIDAE
CERATOCEPHALE OCULATA
NEREIDAE (LPIL)
NEREIS HICROHHA
RULLIERINEREIS SP.A
ONUPHIDAE
DIOPATRA (LPIL)
DIOPATRA CUPREA
HOOREONUPHIS PALLIDULA
ONUPHIDAE (LPIL)
RHAHPHOBRACHIUH SP.C
OPHELIIDAE
ARHANDIA HACULATA
OPHELIIDAE (LPIL)
TRAVISIA HOBSONAE
OPHELLIDAE
OPHELINA DENTICULATA
ORBINIIDAE
LEITOSCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
E-26
-------
TAX0M0H1C LISTIH6
TAIHtOMC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEHSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/01/87
SCOLOPLOS SP.F
OMEN 11 DAE
GALATHOHENIA OCULATA
ONENIA SP.A
OMENIIDAE (LPIL)
PARAONIDAE
ARICIOEA (LPIL)
ARICIDEA CATHERIHAE
ARICIDEA CERftUTII
ARICIDEA PHILBINAE
ARICIDEA SP.A
ARICIDEA SP.E
ARICIDEA SP.H
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
ARICIDEA HASSI
CIRROPHORUS (LPIL)
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
LEVINSENIA GRACILIS
PARAONIDAE (LPIL)
PECTINARIIDAE
PECTINARIIDAE (LPIL)
PHYLLODOCIDAE
ANAITIDES LONGIPES
ANAITIDES MUCOSA
ETEONE LACTEA
GENETYLLIS SP.A
HESIONURA SP.A
NYSTIDES BOREAL IS
PARANAITIS SPECIOSA
PHYLLODOCIDAE (LPIL)
PILARGIDAE
ANCISTROSYLLIS (LPIL)
ANCISTROSYLLIS CAROLIHENSIS
ANCISTROSYLLIS HARTHANAE
ANCISTROSYLLIS JONESI
LITOCORSA ANTENNATA
SIGAHBRA (LPIL)
SIGAHBRA BASSI
SIGAHBRA HASSI
PISIONIDAE
PISIONE SP.A
POECILOCHAETIDAE
POECILOCHAETUS (LPIL)
POLYGORDIIDAE
POLYGORDIUS (LPIL)
POLYNOIDAE
HARHOTHOE (LPIL)
HARNOTHOE SP.B
LEPIDASTHENIA VARIUS
E-27
-------
TAKONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B
TAIOKOHIC LISTING
I—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
;SSSSSS3S3333S333S&SS33S3SSSSS5SSSS3S3SSS22
POLYNOIDAE (LPIL)
POLYNOIDAE GENUS H
SABELLARIIDAE
SABELLAR1A SP.A
SABELLIDAE
CHOW (LPILI
EUCHONE (LPIL)
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
HEGALOHHA BIOCULATUN
SABELLIDAE (LPIL)
SACCOCIRR1DAE
SACCOCIRRUS SP.A
SERPULIDAE
PSEUOOVERHILIA OCCIDENTALIS
SERPULIDAE ILPIL)
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
SIGALIONIDAE
SI6ALI0N SP.A
SIGALIONIDAE (LPIL)
SPIONIDAE
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
DISPIO UNCINATA
LAONICE CIRRATA
NALACOCEROS INDICUS
PARAPRIONOSPI0 PINNATA
POLYDORA CORNUTA
POLYDORA SOCIALIS
PRIONOSPIO (LPIL)
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
SPIO PETTIBONEAE
SPIOHIDAE (LPIL)
SPIOPHANES BOMBYX
SPIOPHANES CF. NISSIONENSIS
SYLL1DAE
BRAN1A WELLFLEETENS IS
EHLERSIA CORNUTA
EHLERSIA FERRU6INA
EURYSYLLIS TUBERCULATA
EI06QNE ATLANTICA
EXOGONE DISPAR
EIOGONE LOUREI
OPISTHOOONTA SP.A
PARAPIONOSYLLIS LONGICIRRATA
PIONOSYLLIS 6ESAE
PLAKOSYLLIS OUADRIOCULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS ACICULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEAE
SYLLIDAE (LPIL)
E-28
-------
TAHWOHIC LISTIM6
TAXOHOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEUSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/01/87
aggagagggagggagggaaggaaasaagaaaaaaagggggggggggggagsggggaaaaaaaaaagagaaaaaataagaa
SYLLIDES FULVUS
TYPOSYLLIS AtlICA
TVPOSYLLIS CF. LUTEA
TEREBELLIDAE
POLYCIRRUS 4LPIL)
TEREBELLIDAE (LPIL)
TRlCKOBftANCHIDAE
TRICHOBRANCMUS GLACIALIS
ARTHROPODA (CRUSTACEA)
CRUSTACEA (LPIL)
AHPHIPODA
AHPHIPODA (LPIL)
AHPELISCIDAE
AHPELISCA (LPIL)
AHPELISCA AGASSIZI
AHPELISCA PARAPACIFICA
AHPELISCA SP.C
AHPELISCA SP.L
AHPHILOCHIDAE
AhPHILOCHUS SP.C
AORIDAE
ACUHINOOEUTOPUS (LPIL)
ACUHINODEUTOPUS NA6LEI
ACUHINODEUTOPUS SP.A
AORIDAE (LPIL)
LEHBOS (LPIL)
LEHBOS SHITHI
HICRODEUTOPUS HYERSI
UNCIOLA SP.B
ARIG1SSIDAE
AR6ISSA HAHATIPES
COROPHIIOAE
COROPHIUH (LPIL)
COROPHIUH SP.L
COROPHIUH SP.H
HAUSTORIIDAE
PROTOHAUSTORIUS BOUSFIELDI
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.E
ISAEIDAE
ISAEIOAE (LPIL)
HEGAHPHOPUS SP.A
PHOTIS (LPIL)
PHOTIS NELAMICUS
PHOTIS SP.O
ISCHYROCER1DAE
CERAPUS SP.B
ERICHTHONIUS (LPIL)
LEUCOTHOIDAE
LEUCOTHOIDAE (LPIL)
E-29
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTIH6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEHSACOLA—SITE B™COLLECTED APRIL 1987
8833S3333S333S8333335S3SS23S33333S33333S338333383333338S3333333
LILJEB0R6IIDAE
LILJEBOR6IA SP.A
LISTRIELLA SP.F
LYSIAMASSIDAE
HIPPOHEDON SP.A
HIPPOHEDON SP.B
LYSIAMASSA ALBA
LYSIAMASSIDAE (LPIL)
NEL1TIDAE
DULICHIELLA (LPIL)
ELASHOPUS SP.C
NAERA SP.D
NE0HE6ADPHOPIDAE
NEOHEfiAHPHOPUS HIATUS
NEOHEGAHPHOPUS KALAMII
OEDICEROTIDAE
HONOCULODES NYEI
OEDICEROTIDAE (LPIL)
SYNCHELID1UH AHERICANUH
PHOXOCEPHALIDAE
HETHARPINA FLORIDANA
PLATYISCHNQPIDAE
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
PODOCERIDAE
PODOCERIDAE (LPIL)
PODOCERUS SP.B
STENOTHOIDAE
PARANETOPELLA SP.A
SYNOPIIDAE
6AR0SYRRH0E SP.B
T1RON (LPIL)
TIRON TRIOCELLATUS
TIRON TROPAKIS
CUHACEA
CUHACEA (LPIL)
BODOTRIIDAE
CYCLASPIS (LPIL)
CYCLASPIS BACESCUI
CYCLASPIS SP.D
CYCLASPIS SP.N
CYCLASPIS SP.O
CYCLASPIS SP.S
CYCLASPIS UNICORNIS
DIASTYL1DAE
OXYUROSTYLIS (LPIL)
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.B
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.C
NANNAST ACIDAE
CAMPYLASPIS SP.I
E-30
-------
TAXQNOHIC LISTING
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
SS3333S333SSSS3SS33333SS33S333388SSSSSS3S3SSS33S8S883333S38SSSS33S8SS333383S3SS3
CAHPYLASPIS SP.H
CAHPYLASPIS SP.O
CUMELLA (LPIL)
CUHELLA SP.6
NAMKASTACIDAE (LPIL)
DECAPODA (NATANTIA)
DECAPODA NATANTIA (LPIL)
ALPHEIDAE
ALPHEUS (LPIL)
PASIPHAEIDAE
LEPTOCHELA PAPULATA
PROCESSIDAE
PROCESSA HEHPH1LL1
SOLEHOCERIDAE
SOLENOCERA ATLANTIDIS
DECAPODA (REPTANTIA)
DECAPODA REPTANTIA (LPIL)
ALBUNEIDAE
ALBUNEA 6IBBESII
CALAPPIDAE
CALAPPA SULCATA
OSACHILA SEHILEVIS
DROHIIDAE
HYPOCONCHA ARCUATA
6QNEPLACIDAE
6LYPT0PLAX SM1TH1I
HAJIDAE
BATRACHONOTUS FRA60SUS
INACHOIDES FORCEPS
PA6URIDAE
PA6URIDAE (LPIL)
PINNOTHERIDAE
DISSODACTYLUS SP.B
PINNIIA SAYANA
PINNOTHERES OSTREUM
PORCELLANIDAE
EUCERAHUS PRAELONGUS
PORTUNIDAE
OVALIPES STEPHENSONI
ISOPODA
ISOPODA (LPIL)
ANTHURIDAE
APANTHURA NA6NIFICA
ANTIASIDAE
ANTIAS (LPIL)
IDOTEIDAE
EDOTEA (LPIL)
EDOTEA LYONSI
SEROLIDAE
SEROLIS NGRAYI
E-31
-------
TAX0NQM1C LISTING
TAXONOMIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEMSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 19B7
LEPTOSTRACA
NEBALIIDAE
NEBALIA BIPES
NYSIDACEA
HVSIDACEA (LPIL)
MVSIDAE
ANCHIALINA TYP1CA
BOUHAN1ELLA PQRTQRICEHSIS
MYSIDOPSIS FURCA
PROHYSIS ATLANT1CA
OSTRACODA
OSTRACODA (LPIL)
CYLINDROLEBERIDIOAE
AMBOLEBERIS AMERICANA
ASTEROPELLA HACLAU6HLINAE
SYNASTEROPE (LPIL)
OSTRACODA FAMILY A
OSTRACODA FAMILY A
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FAMILY i
OSTRACODA FAMILY J
PH HOMED I DAE
HARBANSOS PAUCICHELATUS
PSEUDOPHIL0MEDE5 AMBON
PSEUDOPHILONEDES ZETA
RUTIDERMATIDAE
RUT I DERMA DARBY I
SARSIELLIDAE
EURYPYLUS SP.A
EURYPYLUS SP.B
EUSARSIELLA (LPIL)
EUSARSIELLA DISPARALIS
EUSARSIELLA EL0FS0N1
EUSARSIELLA GETTLESONI
EUSARSIELLA GI6ACANTHA
EUSARSIELLA PILLIPOLL1CIS
EUSARSIELLA RADIICOSTA
EUSARSIELLA SP.E
EUSARSIELLA SP.F
EUSARSIELLA TEIANA
SARSIELLIDAE (LPIL)
TRACHYLEBERIDIDAE
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.B
TANAIDACEA
TANAIDACEA (LPIL)
E-32
-------
TAXQKOHIC LISTING
TAXONONIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
=:ss==:s3s3*sss:3:sss33s3s:s3s3rsss8sszsass«s:ss=33:sasssas3s:ss:s3rs3sss:ss3sss
APSEUDIOAE
APSEUOES PROPINBUUS
APSEUDES SP.H
APSEUDIDAE (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDIOAE
KALLIAPSEUDES (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.A
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.B
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.C
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.D
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.E
LEPTDCHEL1DAE
LEPTOCHELIA SP.D
NOTOTANAIDAE
TANAISSUS SP.A
BRACHIOPODA
BRACHIOPODA (LPIL)
CEPHALOCHORDATA
LEPTOCAROII
BRANCHIOSTOHIOAE
BRANCHIQSTOHA (LPIL)
BRANCHIOSTONA FLORIDAE
BRANCHIQSTOHA VIR6INIAE
CN1DARIA
ACTINIARIA
ACTINIARIA (LPIL)
ANTHOZOA (PENNATULACEA)
PENNATULACEA (LPIL)
ECHINQDERHATA
ASTEROIDEA
ASTEROIOEA (LPIL)
ASTROPECTINIDAE
ASTROPECTEN ARTICULATUS
ECHINOIDEA
ECHINOIDEA (LPIL)
MELLITIDAE
ENCOPE ABERRANS
HOLOTHURQIDEA
HOLOTHUROIDEA (LPIL)
OPHIUROIDEA
0PH1UR0IDEA (LPIL)
ANPHIURIDAE
ANPHIOOIA (LPIL)
ANPHIODIA TRYCHNA
HOLLUSCA
APLACOPHORA
APLACOPHORA (LPIL)
6ASTR0P0DA
6A5TRQP0DA (LPIL)
E-33
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/01/87
33888838888838388333333338353333888883388333333838338333335833333333333338388833
ACTEOCINIDAE
ACTEOCINA BIOEHTATA
ACTEOCINA CANDEI
ACTEOHIDAE
ACTEON PUNCTOSTRIATUS
CAECIDAE
CAECUM (LPIL)
CAECUM CUBITATUH
CAECUM IMBRICATUM
CAECUM PULCHELLUH
CAECUM SP.A
CAECUM SP.C
CANCELLAfiI1DAE
CANCELLARIA RETICULATA
COLUHBELLIDAE
ANACHIS LAFRESNAYI
HITRELLA LUNATA
NASSARINA 6LYPTA
CONIDAE
CONUS FLORIDANUS FLORIDENSIS
CREPIDULIDAE
CALYPTRAEA CENTRALIS
CREPIDULA (LPIL)
CREPIDULA MACULOSA
EP1T0NIIDAE
EPITONIUM (LPIL)
FISSURELLIDAE
LUCAPINELLA LIMATULA
t1AR61 NELL I DAE
NARGINELLA SP.C
HAR6INELLIDAE (LPIL)
NELANELLIDAE
NELANELLIDAE (LPIL)
NISO AEGLEES
STROMBIFORHIS (LPIL)
STROMBIFORMIS SP.H
NATICIDAE
NATICA PUSILLA
NATICIDAE (LPIL)
SI6ATICA SEHISULCATA
OLIVIDAE
OLIVELLA (LPIL)
OLIVELLA ADELAE
OLIVELLA FLORALIA
PYRANIDELLIDAE
TURBONILLA (LPIL)
TURBONILLA CONRADI
RETUSIDAE
VOLVULELLA PERSIHI.IS
E-34
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTINS.
TAIQNWIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PEMSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
333333338333333333333X3333883333383333X33333833333333883333333333333388333333833
TROCHIDAE
TROCHIOAE 6ENUS C
TURftlDAE
CEMMILLIA TtSA
CRASSISPIRA TAHPAENSIS
CRYOTURRIS CITRONELIA
IHODRILLIA SP.A
TURRIDAE GENUS K
TURRITELLIOAE
TURRITELLA ACROPORA
HUDIBRANCHIA
NUDIBRANCH1A (LPIL)
PELECVPOOA
PELECYPODA (LPIL)
ARCIDAE
ANADARA TRANSVERSA
ARCIDAE (LPIL)
CARDITIDAE
PLEUROMEHIS TRIDENTATA
CRASSATELLIDAE
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
6LYCYHERIDIDAE
6LYCYHERIS (LPILi
H1ATELLIDAE
H1ATELLA SP.B
LIHIDAE
LIHATULA SP.A
LUCIHIDAE
LUCINA S0NBRERENS1S
LUCINA SP.B
LUCINA SP.D
LUCIHIDAE (LPIL)
LYONSIIDAE
LYONSIA SP.A
HYTILIDAE
CRENELLA DIVARICATA
HYTILIDAE (LPIL)
NUCULIDAE
NUCULA AE6EENIS
NUCULA PROIIHA
PANDORIDAE
PANDORA (LPIL)
PANDORA ARENOSA
PANDORA BUSHIANA
PECTINIDAE
AR60PECTEN NUCLEUS
PECTINIDAE (LPIL)
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
E-35
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXOHOhIC SPECIES LIST 09/01/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
3838838388833833383333388338883*838838888888888888883383383888838833888333383333
SEHELIDAE
SEHELE EIELLASTRIATA
SEHELE NUCULOIDES
SEHELIDAE (LPIL)
SOLEHYACIOAE
SOLEHYA VELUM
SOLENIDAE
ENSIS MINOR
TELLINIDAE
STRI6ILLA HIRABILIS
TELLINA (LPIL)
TELLINA AEQUISTRIATA
TELLINA TEIANA
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
TELLINIDAE (LPIL)
THRACIIDAE
BUSHIA SP.A
THYASIRIDAE
THYASIRA TRISINUATA
UN6ULINIDAE
DIPLODONTA SP.C
VENERIDAE
CHIONE (LPIL)
CHIONE INTAPURPUREA
CHIONE LAT1LIRATA
SOULDIA CERINA
HACROCALLISTA HACULATA
PITAR SP.C
VENERIDAE (LPIL)
VERTICORDIIDAE
VERTICORDIA ORNATA
POLYPLACOPHORA
POLYPLACOPHORA (LPIL)
SCAPHOPOOA
SCAPHOPODA (LPIL)
DENTALIIDAE
DENTALIUN (LPIL)
SIPHONODENTALIIDAE
CADULUS TETRODON
PHORONIDA
PHORONIS (LPIL)
PLATYHELHINTHES
TURBELLARIA
TURBELLARIA (LPIL)
RHYNCHOCOELA
RHYNCHOCOELA (LPIL)
SIPUNCULA
SIPUNCULA (LPIL)
ASPIOOSIPHONIDAE
ASPID0S1PH0N (LPIL)
E-36
-------
TAIOHOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEMSACOLA—SITE B—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
3S2S8SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS3SSSSS3888S88888SSS3SSSS88SSSSSSSS
ASPIDOSIPHON ALBUS
ASPIDOSIPHON HUELLERI
B0LFIU6II0AE
PHASCOLION STROflBI
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
E-37
-------
SITE C NOVEMBER 1986
Biological Community Parameters
Biomass Data
Taxonomic List
E-38
-------
SITE C
BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY PARAMETERS
EPtt—PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
Sample Type: MACRQf-AUNA
Sample Date (YY/MM/DD): 86/11/07
Sample Area (sq. m.): 0.0079
STATION TOTAL MEAN TAXA TOTAL NO. NEAN STANDARD
NUMBER TAXA PER REPL. INDIVIDUALS DENSITY DEVIATION
H'
J'
101
188
52.8
2098
17704
5526
4.05
0.77
24.45
102
174
45.2
1583
13358
4869
4.12
0.80
23.48
103
176
44.2
1533
12936
6520
4.12
0.80
23.86
104
162
45.4
2119
17881
79B4
3.75
0.74
21.02
105
161
40.4
1516
12793
291!
3.86
0.76
21.85
106
160
42.3
1416
11949
294"*
4.02
0.79
21.91
107
167
37.8
1254
10582
3192
3.93
0.77
23.27
108
156
43.1
1577
13308
4315
4.05
0.80
21.05
109
165
43.7
1901
16042
6507
3.68
0.72
21.72
110
173
45.0
1873
15805
6521
3.97
0.77
22.83
111
190
48.6
1623
13696
7334
4.37
0.83
25.57
112
164
45.2
1937
16345
5293
3.82
0.75
21.54
113
175
45.6
1723
14540
7308
4.17
0.81
23.35
114
174
49.7
2524
21299
13163
3.64
0.71
22.08
115
173
50.8
1950
16455
5565
3.98
0.77
22.70
116
180
37.0
1541
13004
6410
3.81
0.73
24.39
117
186
48.6
2003
16902
5437
4.11
0.79
24.33
118
180
47.8
1743
14708
6358
4.15
0.80
23.98
119
190
60.0
2B64
24168
9910
4.13
0.79
23.74
120
196
51.0
2190
18481
5858
3.99
0.76
25.35
E-39
-------
Wet weight blooAfls Cor Pensacola, Florida, C Site, November 1986. AIL weights In grans.
51*1101 TUN
REP A
KP 1
RIP c
REP 8
KP I
KPf
KP 8
REP H
KP 1
REP J
REP K
REP I
REP R
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCI
RNCLIM
0.017
0.013
0.027
0.017
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.027
0.039
0.007
0.010
0.042
0.021
0.009
0.017
0.346
PfCI
ttnuroM
0.01*
0.004
0.011
0.021
0.003
0.004
0.019
0.018
0.014
0.004
0.042
0.036
0.010
0.044
0.007
0.277
ffCI
nunu
0.21*
9.000
0.018
0.021
0.003
0.334
0.021
0.004
0.003
0.334
0.022
0.132
0.013
0.003
0.017
1.397
PfCI
(CHUOKMIH
0.000'
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.004
0.000
0.009
0.002
o.ooo
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OOl
0.000
0.000
0.017
PfCI
RISCELUftas
0.001
0,002
0.033
0.003
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.009
0.002
0.009
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.092
TOT*
o.us
0.030
0.092
0.044
0.031
0.337
0.044
0.053
0.085
0.370
0.080
0.241
0.032
0.078
0.044
2.129
STATICH TAION
REP A
KP 0
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP f
tS> G
REP H
KP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP 1
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
pfC2
MtniM
0.034
0.019
0.003
O.OU
0.003
0.012
0.004
0.013
0.024
0.003
O.OU
0.013
0.030
0.037
0.009
0.235
PfC2
ttTHflPW
0.003
0.012
0.003
0.008
t.4s;
0.003
0.009
0.029
0.014
0.011
0.013
0.015
0.010
0.003
0.008
1.800
pfa
0.002
0.014
3.047
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.029
0.014
0.008
0.024
0.004
0.072
0.078
0.539
0.029
3.847
pra
EQIMQmMM
0.001
0.003
0.012
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.034
PfCJ
riscelureous
0.M9
0.001
0.003
0.018
0.001
0.009
O.OU
0.001
0.004
0.033
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.009
0.003
0.152
TOT*.
0.093
0.091
3.070
0.048
1.445
0.024
0.034
0.033
0.038
0.072
0.034
0.108
0.121
0.588
0.049
1.088
STATION TRIOR
VP A
KP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP f
REP S
REP H
KP I
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP M
REP I
REP 0
TOTALS
na
menu
0.01B
O.OU
0.043
0.014
0.014
0.013
0.034
0.038
0.008
0.007
0.194
0.002
0.019
0.033
0.024
0.503
PfCJ
0.003
0.014
0.004
0.013
0.006
0.018
0.032
0.008
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.034
0.190
PfC3
ROLLUSU
0.011
0.004
0.031
0.014
0.003
0.038
0.177
0.003
0.001
0.007
0.003
0.031
O.OU
0.028
0.002
0.384
PfCJ
CCHIKKtMTA
0.001
4.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
O.OOO
0.002
0.001
0.013
0.023
PfC3
mscouaous
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.015
0.004
0.010
0.004
0.001
0.004
O.OU
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.014
0.082
TOTAL
o.ou
0.030
0.122
0.048
0.042
0.074
0.233
0.058
0.013
0.024
0.174
0.040
0.039
0.092
0. Ill
1.184
STATIQM TAION
UP A
KP I
REP C
RIP B
RE? C
REP f
REP fi
REP H
REP 1
KP J
REP K
REP L
REP 1
REP R
REP 0
TOTALS
PfC4
ARKLIM
0.0*9
0.030
0.027
0.002
0.001
0.020
0.007
0.013
0.004
0.004
0.009
0.013
0.034
0.300
0.004
0.563
pw
mimm
0.009
0.029
0.004
0.010
0.013
0.023
0.014
0.023
0.043
0.015
0.008
0.025
0.013
0.009
0.013
0.254
PfC4
mollusc*
0.004
0.001
0.011
0.013
0.009
0.027
0.024
0.083
0.044
0.008
0.044
0.013
0.014
0.018
0.008
0.333
PfC«
EQHMOSERMTA
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.234
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OOl
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.245
PfC4
RISCELLAKOtt
O.OOl
0.004
0.009
0.001
0.013
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.008
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.015
0.001
0.002
0.073
TOTAL
0.084
0.013
0.031
0.242
0.037
0.074
0.030
0.124
0.104
0.033
0.048
0.034
0.080
0.329
0.027
1.(70
lUTin run
REP A
SEP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP f
REP 1
REP H
REP 1
KP J
REP 1
REP L
KP ft
KP a
REP 0
TOTALS
pra
MCLIM
0.011
0.010
0.030
0.014
0.004
0.024
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.008
o.ou
0.004
0.007
0.007
0.030
0.160
PfC5
tf TttQPOM
0.0)4
0.001
0.028
0.008
0.004
0.021
0.008
0.004
0.014
0.010
0.003
0.011
O.OIO
0.008
0.012
0.205
PfCJ
H0LLUSCA
0.041
0.024
0.031
0.018
0.024
0.044
0.003
0.038
0.032
0.008
0.017
0.038
0.019
0.031
0.024
0.498
PfCJ
EQIIR00ERMIA
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.013
PfC3
RISCELUUCOUS
0.00?
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.010
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.001
0.004
0.043
TOTAL
0.133
0.090
O.I J?
0.048
0.040
O.ilO
0.0)8
0.038
0.044
0.028
0.034
0.079
0.040
0.047
0.074
0.939
STillQN U10R
Kt ft
REP 1
REP C '
;4EP 0
REP f
REP 6
KP H
REP 1
REP J
KP I
REP L
REP II
KP M
KP 0
TOTALS
PfCI
amelim
0.003
0.002
0.018
0.024
0.007
0.003
0.013
0.041
0.017
0.009
0.012
0.034
0.020
0.009
0.011
0.223
PFCi
AM8UPQ8A
fOLLUSCA
0.009
0.004
0.001
0.018
0.010
0.318
0.012
0.009
0.009
0.008
0.019
0.021
0.019
0.010
0.010
0.478
PFC4
9.023
0.024
0.010
0.024
0.013
0.042
0.028
0.127
0.007
0.021
0.079
0.072
0.140
0.033
0.009
0.480
pfa
ECHIK08UMTA
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
pfti
R1SCELLAS005
0.002
O.OOl
0.001
0.001
0.034
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OOl
0.001
0.037
TOTAL
0.039
0.033
0.037
0.049
0.048
0.349
0.037
0.182
0.034
0.040
0.107
0.130
0.174
0.073
0.031
1.443
STMtQN TIIU
REP A
REP 1
REP C
KP 8
REPC
REP f
REP i
KP if
REP 1
HEP i
kp r
REP L
REP fl
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PfP
AHCLIM
0.011
0.014
0.013
0.014
0.080
0.043
0.102
0.009
0.040
0.049
0.014
0.004
0.008
0.010
0.045
0.489
PfCI
AITM0P0N
WLL3SCA
0.004
0.003
4.234
0.004
0.011
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.023
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.001
O.OOl
0.009
4.329
PfCI
0.071
2.370
0.010
0.021
0.017
0.001
0.074
0.021
0.002
0.003
0.080
0.008
0.013
0.014
0.014
2.723
PfC7
iiscauusous
O.OOl
0.001
0.000
0.007
0.002
0.034
0.001
0.247
0.001
0.003
O.OOl
O.OOl
0.017
0.005
0.002
0.323
TOTAL
0.094
2.388
4.277
0.048
0.M0
0.102
0.179
0.281
0.044
0.039
0.099
0.018
0.039
0.032
0.070
9.844
SIATIQK TAIQB
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 1
REP E
REP f
REP8
KP H
REP 1
REP J
KP 1
REP L
KP n
REPI
REP B
TOTALS
pfa
MCLIM
0.014
0.023
0.033
0.007
O.OU
0.044
0.003
0.013
0.071
0.034
0.018
0.011
0.003
0.014
0.047
0.445
PfCI
AfttttOPOOA
0.004
0.010
0.000
0.064
0.013
0.009
0.009
0.014
0.013
0.013
0.019
0.014
0.014
0.009
0.017
0.178
pfa
HOLLUSCA
0.092
0.112
0.018
O.OOl
0.003
0.004
0.007
0.442
0.002
0.099
0.003
0.009
0.002
0.005
O.OOl
0.744
pfa
cchiroscrmta
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOO
0.000
0.000
O.OOl
O.OH
pfa
MSCEUAK8US
0.001
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.006
0.008
0.009
0.001
0.009
0.002
0.010
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.059
TOTAL
0.093
0.149
0.043
0.013
0.083
0.048
0.034
0.481
0.089
0.171
0.044
0.044
0.021
0.034
0.088
1.477
E-40
-------
station tum
KP A
KP 1
REP c
KP t
KP E
KP F
KP i
KP 1
KP 1
KP J
KPI
KPL
KPI
BE? 1
KP 0
TOTU
ffCT
ANKLISA
9.01t
0.020
0.00]
O.MS
0.012
fl.OU
0.00)
0.004
0.020
0.013
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.047
0.003
0.220
PfC9
MTMRflNM
0.019
0.005
0.001
0.004
0.00)
0.004
0.013
0.019
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.024
0.100
0.214
PfCI
0.007
0.029
0.121
O.IIA
0.18
0.011
0.013
0.017
0.922
0.017
0.071
0.019
0.023
0.010
0.024
0.501
PfCI
catuaaaui
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.002
4.001
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.020
PfC?
msceuakous
O.OH
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.002
o.ou
1.00)
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OU
0.004
0.004
0.044
TOTAL
0.042
o.osa
0.1 IS
0.171
0.149
9.043
0.041
0.049
0.091
O.OU
0.041
0.023
0.034
o.oa
o.ia
l.lll
STATIOi mm
KP 1
KP 1
KP C
KP ft
kp E
KP f
KP i
OP 1
KP 1
KP i
KP K
KP L
KP 1
KP N
KP 0
TOTALS
PfCIO
AHCLIOA
0.042
9.027
0.007
0.030
0.024
0.011
0.013
0.033
0.075
0.004
0.001
0.013
0.003
0.041
0.044
0.311
PfCIO
AM8NP00A
0.001
0.007
0.419
0.004
0.012
0.009
0.017
O.OH
o.oot
0.008
0.731
0.010
0.011
0.014
0.000
0.811
PfClO
HQLlUStt
0.012
0.042
0.013
0.004
0.002
0.020
0.001
0.170
0.021
0.011
0.004
0.009
0.001
0.009
0.011
0.343
PfCIO
eaittKBttu
0.000
0.001
0.401
0.001
0.063
0.002
9.000
0.001
0.000
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.007
0.000
0.027
PfCIO
iisceuakow
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.007
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.013
0.004
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.044
TOT*
0.049
0.011
0.939
0.042
0.044
0.034
0.033
0.220
0.070
0.037
0.714
0.037
0.026
0.041
0.081
1.714
KPI ttP I IOC 01 » E KM B i Iff! KM Iff J ttP I KPl ttf H VI KM T0TAL9
PfCll
AMEL1M
0.017
O.OH
0.002
0.910
0.033
0.009
0.008
0.034
0.020
0.027
0.009
0.014
0.004
0.011
0.099
0.272
PfCll
MTMHVQOA
0.003
o.oto
0.003
0.924
0.907
0.007
0.002
9.010
0.017
0.017
0.004
0.013
0.009
0.004
o.oss
0.189
PfCll
0.002
0.017
43.399
0.119
0.010
0.024
0.013
0.033
0.010
0.013
0.093
0.023
0.004
0.008
0.032
43.946
Pftll
uhinooomta
0.000
0.001
0.020
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.031
PfCH
IISC&LAKOUS
0.002
0.020
0.091
0.010
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.013
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.082
TOTU
0.024
0.042
43.383
0.141
0.033
0.042
0.024
0.102
0.033
0.040
0.113
0.044
0.019
0.041
0.131
44.940
STATION UN*
KP A
KP t
KP C
KP 8
KP E
REP F
KP 6
KP H
REP 1
REP J
KP 1
REP L
REP 1
REP I
KP 0
TOTALS
PfCI J
AMELIH
0.011
0.018
0.014
0.014
0.023
0.008
0.008
1.018
O.OU
0.004
0.089
O.Ott
0.004
O.OOf
0.003
0.2S3
PfClJ
MTMttPOM
0.007
0.012
0.010
0.908
0.022
0.008
0.007
0.010
0.008
0.018
0.009
0.012
0.024
0.019
0.011
0.117
PfCl2
HOLLOSCA
O.OIS
0.013
0.010
0.923
0.124
0.024
0.003
0.003
0.094
0.022
0.001
0.006
0.011
0.039
0.009
0.388
PfCI2
ECMIN08EIMTA
0.000
0.001
0.090
0.900
0.004
0.003
9.000
0.000
0.001
0.008
0.001
o.oot
0.000
0.009
0.001
0.074
PfCI 2
IISCOLAKOUS
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.008
0.004
0.024
0.003
0.002
O.OOl
0.007
0.804
0.007
0.003
0.009
0.004
0.884
TOTU
O.OH
0.048
0.037
0.033
0.183
0.041
0.023
0.033
0.117
0.041
0.904
0.037
0.044
0.043
0.024
1.716
STATION mat
KP 4
KP 1
KP C
KP B
KP E
REP F
REP 6
REP 1
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP H
REP N
KP 0
TOTALS
PfCU
a
i
0.004
0.003
0.009
0.988
0.007
0.043
0.017
0.021
0.018
0.012
0.014
0.008
0.017
0.004
0.009
0.274
PfCI)
MTMPOSA
0.019
0.01?
O.OU
0.908
9.010
0.014
9.010
0.014
0.008
0.013
0.003
0.014
0.022
0.00)
0.007
0.769
PfCU
HOLLUSCA
0.097
0.123
0.043
0.933
0.023
0.040
9.013
2.282
0.042
0.044
0.017
0.073
0.039
0.027
0.019
2.899
PfCl3
ECHimUMTA
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.901
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
O.tfO
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.001
0.011
PfCI]
msouNsaus
0.003
0.004
0.004
9.902
0.003
0.002
9.001
0.003
0.902
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.00)
0.001
0.047
TOTAL
0.074
0.133
0.121
0.132
0.044
0.102
9.041
2.324
0.070
0.074
0.037
0.104
9.064
0.03?
0.033
3.440
STATION TAION
KP 4
KP 8
KP C
KP 0
KP E
KP F
KP 6
REP H
REP I
KP J
REP K
REP L
REP H
REPI
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCH
ANKLIDA
0.032
O.OH
0.033
0.901
0.012
0.007
9.039
0.011
0.127
0.043
0.010
0.022
0.010
0.0*5
0.012
0.443
PfCH
AAT10QPQBA
0.001
O.OIO
0.013
0.912
0.003
0.002
0.024
0.004
0.008
0.013
0.003
0.004
0.003
9.004
0.004
0.123
PfCH
ULLVSCI
0.024
0.004
0.001
0.027
0.007
0.003
9.041
0.020
0.011
0.007
0.004
0.007
0.109
0.409
0.009
0.474
PfCH
UHIKOSOMTA
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.001
9.00!
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.014
PfCH
IISCaUMEOUS
0.008
0.044
0.002
0.032
0.003
9.007
9.022
0.003
0.014
0.004
0.01)
0.044
0.007
0.904
0.009
0.242
TOTAL
0.073
0.074
0.041
0.101
0.031
0.020
9.121
0.041
0.143
0.091
0.032
0.100
0.131
0.(34
0.027
1.318
STATION TAHDI
KP A
KP 8
KP C
KP 0
KP E
KP F
KP 6
KP It
KP 1
REP i
REP K
REP L
REP H
kp a
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCIS
ANKLIBA
0.012
0.012
0.112
0.007
O.OH
0.003
9.013
0.003
0.008
0.021
0.017
0.020
0.003
0.028
0.019
0.194
PfCU
MIMPQ8A
0.003
0.004
0.908
0.003
O.OH
0.003
9.012
0.012
0.043
0.014
0.01)
0.012
0.012
O.OU
0.013
0.212
Pf CIS
HOUOSCA
0.004
0.011
0.943
0.012
0.019
0.083
9.009
0.017
0.018
0.017
0.001
0.028
0.037
0.03?
0.013
0.383
PfCIS
EQUHOOMTA
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
9.004
9.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.012
PfClS
mscaiMious
0.001
0.003
0.923
0.908
0.004
9.002
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.010
0.008
0.009
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.083
TOTAL
0.023
0.040
0.10?
0.933
0.047
0.101
9.038
0.033
0.014
0.049
0.043
0.044
0.034
0.988
0.048
0.884
SIATIQM T4IIM KM KM KM KP I KP t KP F KP 4 EP H HIP I KP J KM KPl KP « «£P » KM IDTttJ
FFCIt Wim 0.011 0.021 0.41) a.OI* O.OIJ O.OH O.IM 0.020 0.02J O.OH 0.027 0.011 0.01? 0.007 o.ou 0.M1
PFCU tttKttnW 0.001 0.0JS 0.007 0.001 0.001 0.022 0.020 O.OOJ 0.001 0.02J O.OOJ 0.012 0.00J 0.001 O.OH 0.148
PfCU 1I'«" 0.001 0.009 0.074 0.000 0.001 I.J84 0.034 O.OOJ 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.001 O.OOJ 0.010 0.001 I.JJ7
PfCU CCWWWWI* 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.000 0.000 0.004 0.000 O.OIJ 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.02) 0.0M
PFCU mSCaiMCOUS 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.012 J-OC3 O.OOl 9.Q03 0.00 ) 0.005 0.002 0.001 O.OOJ 0.008 0.003 0.041
JOtd 0.027 0.047 0.114 0.0J0 1.021 1.441 0.221 O.OIJ O.OW 0.0W 0.0J2 0.011 O.OJO 0.029 0.077 2.HI
E-41
-------
SEP A ttP I KP C «£P 0 Iff E REP f fl£P 6 KPH REP I REP J KP K REP L ttM KPN KPO TOTALS
pfcu anklim
0.017
0.094
0.007
O.OU
0.020
0.001
0.003
0.010
0.015
0.022
0.909
0.033
0.022
0.034
0.034
0.330
PFCI7 MTHHP©*
0.032
O.OJO
O.OU
0.004
0.020
0.007
0.008
0.010
O.OU
o.oto
0.011
0.013
0.004
0.006
o.oie
0.196
few iouusca
0.013
0.002
0.004
0.009
0.060
0.013
0.017
0.007
0.006
0.013
0.013
O.Otl
0.007
0.006
0.014
0.206
PfC!7 ECNINGSam?*
0.041
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.300
0.000
0.000
0.001
6.311
pfci; hisceluweoos
0.007
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.001
0.239
0.003
0.002
0.017
0.010
0.004
0.010
0.002
0.010
0.341
TOTAL
0.077
0.067
o.oie
0.012
0.10}
0.024
0.291
0.032
0.039
0.064
0.043
6.372
0.041
0.048
0.077
7.381
STATiOi TAItt
REP A
KP 1
KP c
REP I
REP E
REP F
SEP 6
REP H
REP I
REP J
SEP I
REP I
REP n
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PfClfl
ANNELIDA
0.021
0.047
0.017
0.043
0.018
0.031
0.032
0.010
0.013
0.020
0.033
0.011
0.038
0.028
0.033
0.448
PFCI8
AftTMflPIM
0.003
0.019
0.008
0.003
0.008
0.008
0.010
0.003
0.D19
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.012
0.007
o.ooe
0.129
PfClfi
WUUSCA
0.013
0.030
0.011
0.017
0.019
0.036
0.022
0.077
4.142
0.013
0.034
0.033
0.028
0.109
0.027
0.633
PFC18
EOUNUCMTA
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
•i.OOl
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
PFCI8
MKtllASflUS
0.033
0.002
0.286
0.004
0.023
0.001
0.001
0.001
".004
0.007
0.00
0.001
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.400
TOTAL
0.092
0.098
0.323
0.074
0.070
0.116
0.063
0.093
0.201
0.047
0.102
0.060
0.081
0.144
0.071
1.639
KPt REPI REP C Btf 0 REP E R£P F tfft UP H SEM REP J KM REP L KPII REP I
PFCI9
ANNELIDA
0.027
0.041
0.028
0.027
0.023
O.OU
0.023
0.042
0.036
0.123
0.022
0.034
0.023
0.060
0.023
0.589
PFCI9
AITHMftBA
0.009
0.024
0.022
0.017
0.021
0.008
0.023
0.016
0.018
0.012
0.027
0.007
0.016
0.004
0.006
0.230
PFCI9
HOLLUSCA
0.011
0.039
0.213
0.248
0.093
0.062
0.020
0.014
0.100
0.040
0.036
0.001
0.073
0.074
0.039
1.074
PfCH
ECHJMKMttTA
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
0.000
0.001
0.000
O.OOO
0.003
PFCI9
MISCELLANEOUS
0.001
0.008
0.023
0.004
0.023
0.014
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.001
0.012
0.008
0.014
0.006
0.004
0.133
TOTAL
0.049
0.112
0.288
0.296
0.161
0.093
0.070
0.079
0.180
0.176
0.997
0.077
0.131
0.144
0.072
2.029
STATlOfl TAltt
REP A
SEP I
REP C
REP 0
REP I
REP f
SEP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
KP K
REP L
REP R
REP I
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCM
ANNELIDA
0.033
0.010
0.037
0.037
0.022
0.009
0.049
0.030
0.021
0.012
0.003
0.033
0.033
0.063
0.860
1.298
PFC20
AftTKBPQSA
0.003
0.022
0.009
0.026
0.016
0.028
0.009
0.020
0.013
0.003
O.OOl
0.011
0.014
0.013
0.003
0.201
PFC20
ROLLUSCA
0.032
0.010
0.033
0.033
0.069
0.096
0.013
0.073
0.133
0.146
0.061
0.032
0.040
0.047
0.020
0.934
PFC20
ECHINOBCMATA
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.010
PFC20
MISCELLANEOUS
0.001
0.002
0.008
0.009
0.001
0.009
0.010
0.018
0.366
0.019
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.004
0.009
0.460
TOTAL
0.078
0.114
0.109
0.107
0.108
0.143
0.082
0.163
0.333
0.180
0.071
0.077
0.091
0.131
0.894
2.903
E-42
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTIN6
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/2S/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NQVEHBER 1987
33S33333883S38S3S83SS8S3SSS38883888S38338&a8888a388*888S8a3a&3SS8888SS3aSS38S833
ANNELIDA
HIRUDINEA
HIRUDINEA (LPIL)*
*TPIL - Lowest Practicable
Identification Level
0LI6OCHAETA
0LI6OCHAETA (LPIL)
POLYCHAETA
AHPHARETIDAE
AMPHARETIDAE (LPIL)
ISOLDA PULCHELLA
NELINNA NACULATA
SABELLIDES SP.A
AHPHINOHIOAE
CHLOEIA VIRIDIS
PARAHPHINONE SP.B
APHRODITIDAE
APHR06ENIA SP.A
ARABELLIDAE
ORILONEREIS LONGA
CAP!TELLIDAE
CAPITELLIDAE (LPIL)
NASTOBRANCHUS VARIABILIS
HEDIQHASTUS (LPIL)
HEDIOHASTUS CALIFORNIENSIS
NOTQHASTUS (LPIL)
CHAETOPTERIDAE
CHAETOPTERIDAE (LPIL)
CHRYSOPETALIDAE
BHAHANIA HETEROSETA
PALEANOTUS SP.A
CIRRATULIDAE
CAULLERIELLA (LPIL)
CAULLERIELLA CF. ALATA
CHAETOZONE (LPIL)
CHAETOZONE SP.I
CIRRATULIDAE (LPIL)
CIRRIFORHIA (LPIL)
THARVX CF. ANNULOSUS
DORVILLEIDAE
DQRVILLE1DAE (LPIL)
PETTIBONEIA DUOFURCA
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
SCHISTQHERIN60S (LPIL)
SCHIST0NERIN60S CF. RUDOLPHI
SCHISTONERINGOS PECTINATA
EULEPETHIDAE
EULEPETHIDAE (LPIL)
6RUBEULEPIS SP.A
EUNICIDAE
EUNICE VITTATA
E-43
-------
TA10NQHIC LISTIH6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/23/87
EPA-PENSACQLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
EUNICIDAE (LPIL)
LYSI01CE SP.B
HARPHYSA SANSUINEA
FLABELLI6ERIDAE
FLABELLIGERIDAE (LPIL)
THEROCHAETA SP.A
GLYCERIDAE
GLVCERA (LPIL)
SLYCERA AMERICANA
SLYCERA DIBRANCH1ATA
GLYCERA SP.A
SLYCERA SP.I
SLYCERA SP.P
BONIADIDAE
GONIADA LITTOREA
60NIADA HACULATA
SON!ABIDES CAROLINAE
HESIONIDAE
HESIONIDAE (LPIL)
HESIONIDAE GENUS D
HETEROPODARKE FORHALIS
HETEROPODARKE LYONSI
PODARKEOPSIS LEVIFUSCINA
LUHBRINER1DAE
LUHBRINERIDAE (LPIL)
LUHBRINERIDES DAYI
LUNBRINERIS (LPIL)
LUNBR1NERIS LATREILLI
LUNBRINERIS SP.D
LUNBRINERIS VERRILLI
NA6EL0NIDAE
NAGELONA (LPIL)
HAGELONA PETTIBONEAE
NAGELONA SP.B
HAGELONA SP.C
NAGELONA SP.I
HALDANIDAE
AXIOTHELLA SP.A
BOGUEA ENIGNATICA
B06UEA SP.A
HALDANIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYIDAE
AGLAOPHANUS VERRILLI
NEPHTYIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYS PICTA
NEPHTYS SIHONI
NEREIDAE
CERATOCEPHALE OCULATA
NEREIDAE (LPIL)
E-44
-------
TAIOXQHIC LISTING
TAXOHQHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACQLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
08/29/87
NEREIS (IPIL)
NEREIS MICROHM
RULIIERINEREIS SP.A
ONUPHIDAE
OIOPATRA CUPREA
DIOPATRA TRIDENTATA
NOOREOMIPHIS PALLIDA
OPHELIIDAE
AftftANDIA MCULATA
OPHELIA DENT ICifl.ATA
OPHELIIDAE (LPIL)
TRAVISIA HOBSONAE
ORBINIIDAE
LEITOSCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
LEITOSCOLOPLOS FRA6ILIS
ORBINIIDAE (LPIL)
SCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
SCOLOPLOS RUBRA
OHENIIDAE
6ALATH0NENIA OCULATA
QHENIA SP.A
OHENIIDAE (LPIL)
PARAONIDAE
ARICIOEA (LPIL)
ARICIDEA CATHERINE
ARICIDEA CERRUTII
ARICIDEA PHILBINAE
ARICIDEA SP.A
ARICIDEA SP.E
ARICIDEA SP.H
ARICIDEA SP.L
ARICIDEA SP.T
ARICIDEA SP.X
ARICIDEA TAYLOR!
ARICIDEA HASSI
CIRROPHORUS (LPIL)
C1RR0PH0RUS BRANGHIATUS
LEVINSENIA 6RACILIS
PARAONIDAE (LPIL)
PARA0N1S PY60EHI6HATICA
PECTINARIIDAE
PECTINARIIDAE (LPIL)
PHYLL0D0C1DAE
ANAITIDES SROEHLANDICA
ANAITIDES L0N6IPES
ANAITIDES MUCOSA
ETEONE LACTEA
6ENETYLLIS SP.A
HESIONURA SP.A
E-45
-------
TAUMOHIC LISTIH6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSAGOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
08/23/87
:33S3S3S8SSSS8838833SS83888S33333333S833388SS3S8S8S88
8388833833888883338:
HYSTIDES BOREALIS
PARAHAITIS SPEC10SA
PHYLLODQCE ARENAE
PHVLLODOCIDAE (LPIL)
PILAR6I0AE
ANCISTROSYLLIS (LPIL)
AKCISTROSVLLIS HARTIWNAE
LITOCQRSA ANTENMATA
SI6AHBRA BASSI
SIGAHBRA TENTACULATA
PISIONIDAE
PISIONIDAE (LPIL)
P0ECILIH9METIDAE
POECILOCHAETUS (LPIL)
P0LY60RDIIOAE
POLYEORDIUS (LPIL)
POLYNOIDAE
POLVNOIDAE (LPIL)
SABELLARIIOAE
SABELLARIA SP.A
SABELLIDAE
CHONE (LPIL)
EUCHONE (LPIL)
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
POTAMILLA SP.E
SABELLIDAE (LPIL)
SACCOCIRRIDAE
SACCOCIRRUS SP.A
SERPULIDAE
SERPULA SP.A
SERPULIDAE (LPIL)
SERPULIDAE 6ENUS C
VERHILIOPSIS ANNULATA
SI6ALIONIDAE
SI6ALI0N SP.A
SI6ALI0NIDAE (LPIL)
THALENESSA SP.C
SPIQNIDAE
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
LAONICE CIRRATA
NALACOCEROS (LPIL)
HICROSPIO PI6HENTATA
PARAPRIONOSPIO PINNATA
POLYDORA (LPIL)
POLYDORA CORNUTA
POLYDORA SOCIALIS
PRIONOSPIO (LPIL)
PRIONOSPIO CIRR1FERA
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
E-46
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTIHS
TAXONQMC SPECIES LIST 08/23/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
SCOLELEPIS SSUAHATA
SPIO PETTIBQNEAE
SPIQNIDAE (LPILI
SPIOPHANES BOHBYI
SPIOPHANES CF. HISSI0NEN5IS
SYLLIME
MANIA MELLFLEETENSIS
EHLERSIA FERRUfilNA
EURYSYUIS TUBERCULATA
EXOSONE ATLANTICA
EIOGONE DISPAR
nam lourei
HAPLOSYLLIS SP0N6IC0LA
ODONTDSYLLIS ENOPLA
OPISTHODONTA SP.A
PMAPI0N0SYLL1S LONSICIRRATA
PIONOSYLLIS GESAE
PLAKOSYLLIS OUASRIOCULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS ACICULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEAE
SYLLIME (LPIL)
SYLLIDES FULVUS
TYPOSYLLIS AHICA
TYPOSYLLIS CF. LUTEA
TYPOSYLLIS SP.C
TEREBELLIDAE
POLYCIRRUS (LPIL)
POLYCIRRUS SP.F
POLYCIRRUS SP.6
TEREBELLIDAE (LPIL)
TRICHOBRANCHIOAE
TR1CHQBRAHCHUS SLACIAL1S
ARTHROPODA (CRUSTACEA)
CRUSTACEA (LPIL)
AMPHIPODA
AHPHIPODA (LPIL)
AKPEL1SCIDAE
ANPELISCA (LPIL)
AHPELISCA A6ASSIZI
ANPELISCA SP.A
ANPELISCA SP.C
ANPELISCA SP.L
AORIDAE
ACUHINODEUTQPUS (LPIL)
ACUHINODEUTOPUS MA6LEI
ACUH1NODEUTOPUS SP.A
AORIDAE (LPIL)
LEHBOS (LPIL)
E-47
-------
TAXOWMIC LISTIN6
TAXOMOttlC SPECIES LIST 08/25/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C™COLLECTED MOVEHBER 1987
»»»»Ba«si3««sssa»snsa«sa3a3«snaes3ssgaaga
LEMBOS SHITHI
H1CR00EUT0PUS NYERS1
ARI6ISSIDAE
AR6ISSA HAHATIPES
BATEIDAE
BATE I DAE (LPIL)
CARINOBATEA CARINATA
COROPHIIDAE
CffiQPHIIDAE (LPIL)
COMPHIUH (LPIL)
COROPH1UH ACUTUH
COMPHIUK SP.F
COROPHIUH SP.L
COROPHIUH SP.H
HAUSTORIIDAE
ACANTHOHAUS TORIUS SHOEMAKERI
ACANTHOHAUSTQRIUS SP.B
HAUSTORIIDAE (LPIL)
PROTQHAUSTORIUS BOUSFIELDI
PRQTOHAUSTORIUS SP.B
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.C
ISAEIDAE
ISAE1DAE (LPIL)
HEGAHPHOPUS (LPIL)
HE6AHPH0PUS SP.A
PHOTIS (LPIL)
PHOTIS HELANICUS
PHOTIS SP.D
LILJEB0R6IIDAE
LILJEB0R6IA (LPIL)
LILJEBORGIA SP.A
LILJEBORBIIDAE (LPIL)
LISTRIELLA (LPIL)
LISTRIELLA SP.F
LISTRIELLA SP.6
LYSIANASSIDAE
HIPPONEDOH SP.A
HIPPOHEDON SP.B
LYSIANASSA (LPIL)
LYSIAKASSA CUBENSIS
HELITIDAE
DULICHIELLA (LPIL)
DULICHIELLA SP.B
ELASHOPUS (LPIL)
ELASItOPUS SP.C
HELITIDAE (LPIL)
NEOHEGAHPHOPIDAE
NE0HE6AHPH0PUS HIATUS
OEDICERCTIDAE
WMOCULODES WYEI
E-48
-------
TAXOWMIC LISTIH6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
08/25/87
a8S33a88S83SS88aa3S888883S3S8SS838S333S8S383S33S38S8SS3338883838333SS3S8&3S3S3S3
SYNCHEL1DIUH AHERICANUH
PHOXOCEPHALIDAE
HETHARP1KA FLQRIMKA
PLATVISCHMOPIDAE
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
PODOCERIOAE
POOOCERUS (LPIL)
PODOCERUS SP.B
SYN0P1IDAE
GAROSYRRHOE SP.B
SYNOPIIDAE (LPIL)
TIRON (LPIL)
TIRON TRIOCELLATUS
TIRON TROPAKIS
CUHACEA
CUHACEA (LPIL)
BODOTRIIDAE
BODOTRIIDAE (LPIL)
CYCLASPIS (LPIL)
CYCLASPIS SP.D
CYCLASPIS SP.N
CYCLASPIS SP.O
CYCLASPIS UNICORNIS
DIASTYLIDAE
OXYUROSTYLIS (LPIL)
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.B
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.C
NANNASTACIDAE
CAHPYLASPIS (LPIL)
CAHPYLASPIS SP.I
CAHPYLASPIS SP.N
CAHPYLASPIS SP.O
CUHELLA (LPIL)
CUHELLA SP.6
CUHELLA SP.H
DECAPODA (NATANTIA)
DECAPODA NATANTIA (LPIL)
ALPHEIDAE
ALPHEIDAE (LPIL)
ALPHEUS (LPIL)
ALPHEUS NORHANNI
PASIPHAEIDAE
LEPTOCHELA PAPULATA
PENAEIDAE
PENAEUS (LPIL)
PROCESSIDAE
PROCESSA HEMPHILLI
S1CY0NIIDAE
SICYONIA BREVIROSTRIS
E-49
-------
TAIQNOMC LISTIK6
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEHBER 19B7
08/25/87
33338388883888338388338383333833383333338338333833333388333383338838388883333338
SICY0N1A PARRI
SICYOHIIDAE (LPILI
SQLENOCERIDAE
SOLENOCERA ATLANTIDIS
DECAPODA (REPTANTIA)
DECAPODA REPTANTIA (LPILI
ALBUNEIDAE
ALBUNEA 6IBBESII
DROHIIDAE
DRON1D1A ANTILLENSIS
HYPOCONCHA ARCUATA
60NEPLACIDAE
FREVILLEA HIRSUTA
BLYPTOPLAJ SH1THII
LEUCOSIIDAE
EBALIA SP.B
EBALIA STIHPSONII
SPELOEOPHORUS PONTIFER
HAJIDAE
BATRACHONOTUS FRAbOSUS
!NACHOIDES FORCEPS
HAJIDAE (LPIL)'
PA6URIDAE
PA6URIDAE (LPIL)
PARTHENOPIDAE
CRYPTOPODIA CONCAVA
HETEROCRYPTA 6RANULATA
HESORHOEA SEISPINQSA
PARTHENOPIDAE (LPIL)
PINNOTHERIDAE
PINNIKA (LPIL)
P INN IU SAY ANA
PORCELLANIDAE
EUCERAHUS PRAELQN6US
PORTUNIDAE
PORTUNUS SP1NICARPUS
KANTHIDAE
NANOPLAX XANTHIFORM1S
ISOPODA
ISOPODA (LPIL)
ANTHURIDAE
APANTNURA HA6NIFICA
PTILANTHURA SP.B
IDOTEIDAE
EOOTEA (LPIL)
EDOTEA LYONSI
SEROLIDAE
SEROUS H6RAYI
LEPTuSTRACh
NEPALIIDAE
NEBALIA BIPES
E-50
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTINS
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/23/87
EPA-PEHSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
«SSS88nS88Sa8S38S8388SSSSSSSSaS3S8SS6S388SSSa8l38SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS883S3S8S8SS8SS
HYSIDACEA
HYSIDACEA (LPIL)
HYSIDAE
AMATHINYSIS (LPIL)
ANCHIALINA TYP1CA
BONHAMELLA PORTORICENSIS
HYSIDOPSIS FURCA
OSTRACODA
OSTRACOOA (LPIL)
CYLINDROLEBERIDIDAE
AtlBOLEBERIS AHERICANA
ASTERQPELLA HACLAUGHLINAE
ASTEROPTERY6ION OCULITRISTIS
SYNASTEROPE (LPIL)
OSTRACODA FAMILY A
OSTRACODA FAMILY A
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FAMILY J
OSTRACODA FAMILY i
PHILOMEDIDAE
HARBANSUS PAUCICHELATUS
RUTIDERMATIDAE
RUTIDERMA DARBY I
SARSIELLIDAE
EUSARSIELLA DISPARALIS
EUSARSIELLA ELOFSONI
EUSARSIELLA 6I6ACANTHA
EUSARSIELLA PILLIPOLLICIS
TRACHYLEBERIDIDAE
ACTINOCYTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCVTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCYTKEREIS SP.B
TANAIDACEA
TANAIDACEA (LPIL)
APSEUDIDAE
APSEUDES PROPINQUUS
APSEUDES SP.H
APSEUDIDAE (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDIDAE
KALLIAPSEUDES (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.A
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.B
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.C
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.D
LEPT.OCHEL I DAE
LEPTOCHELIA SP.D
E-51
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOH1C SPECIES LIST , 08/25/87
EPA-PENSACQLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
NOTOTANAIDAE
TANAISSUS SP.A
BRACH10P0DA
BRACHIOPODA (LPIL)
CEPHALOCHORDATA
LEPTOCARDII
BRANCHIOSTOHIDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA (LPIL)
BRANCHIOSTOHA FLDRIOAE
BRANCHIOSTONA LONGIROSTRUH
BRANCHIOSTOHA VIRGINIAE
CNIDARIA
ACTINIARIA
ACTINIARIA (LPIL)
ACTINIARIA (LPIL)
ECHINODERHATA
ASTER01DEA
ASTEROIDEA (LPIL)
ASTROPECTINIDAE
ASTROPECTEN ARTICULATUS
ASTROPECTINIDAE (LPIL)
ECHINOIDEA
ECHINOIDEA (LPIL)
ECHINOIDEA (LPIL)
OPHIUROIDEA
OPHIUROIDEA (LPIL)
AHPHIURIDAE
AMPHIODIA (LPIL)
AHPHIODIA TRYCHNA
AHPHIURIDAE (LPIL)
AHPHIURIDAE 6ENUS B
ECHIURA
ECHIURA (LPIL)
HEHICHORDATA
HEHICHORDATA (LPIL)
HOLLUSCA
6ASTR0P0DA
GASTROPODA (LPIL)
ACTEOCINIDAE
ACTEOCINA CANDEI
ACTEONIDAE
ACTEON PUNCTOSTRIATUS
ARCHITECTONICIDAE
ARCHITECTONICA NOBILIS
ATYIDAE
ATYS (LPIL)
ATYS SANDERSONI
CAECIDAE
CAECUM (LPIL)
E-52
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIG SPECIES LIST 08/25/87
EPA-PENSACQLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEHBER 1987
ssssssssssssssssssssssssssasssissssssssssassssszsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssess
CAECUM CUBITATUH
CAECUM IHBRICATUM
CAECUM PULCHELLUN
CAECUM SP.A
CAECUM SP.C
CANCELLARI1DAE
CAMCELLARIA RETICULATA
COLUMBELLIDAE
ANACHIS LAFRESNAYI
NASSARINA 6LYPTA
CON1DAE
CONUS FLORIDANUS FLORIOENSIS
CREPIDULIDAE
CALYPTRAEA CENTRALIS
CREPIDULA (LPIL)
CREPIDULA CONVEXA
CREPIDULA MACULOSA
CREPIDULIDAE (LPIL)
EPITONIIDAE
EPITONIUH (LPIL)
FISSURELLIDAE
FISSURELL1DAE (LPIL)
MAR6INELLIDAE
6RANULINA OVULIFORMIS
MAR6INELLA (LPIL)
HAR6INELLA SP.C
MELANELLIDAE
NISO AEGLEES
STROHBIFORHIS (LPIL)
STR0M81FDRM1S AURICINCTUS
NATICIDAE
NATICA PUSILLA
NATICIDAE (LPIL)
POLINICES LACTEUS
SIBATICA SEMISULCATA
SINUN (LPIL)
SINUH PERSPECTIVE
0LIV1DAE
JASPIDELLA SP.A
OLIVA SAYANA
OLIVELLA (LPIL)
OLIVELLA ADELAE
OLIVELLA FLORALIA
PYRANIDELLIDAE
TURBONILLA (LPIL)
TURBONILLA CONRADI
RETUSIDAE
VOLVULELLA PERSINILIS
TEREBR1DAE
TEPEBRA DISLOCATA
E-53
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAIONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/25/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
33333388888388338833335333333333333383353338383383333333333338333338883385338333
TEREBRIDAE (LPIL)
TROCHIDAE
TROCHIDAE GENUS C
TURRIDAE
CRYOTURRIS CITRQNELLA
INODRILLIA SP.A
KURTZIELLA RUBELLA
TURRIDAE (LPIL)
TURRIDAE GENUS K
TURRIDAE GENUS L
TURRITELLIDAE
TURRITELLA ACROPORA
PELECYPODA
PELECYPODA (LPIL)
ARC IDAE
ANADARA TRANSVERSA
ARC!DAE (LPIL)
CARD11DAE
CARD11DAE (LPIL)
LAEVICARDIUN (LPIL)
LAEVICARDIUN LAEVI6ATUH
CARDITIDAE
PLEUROHERIS TR1DENTATA
CHAMIDAE
ARCINELLA CORNUTA
CRASSATELLIDAE
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
HIATELLIDAE
H1ATELLA SP.B
LIHIDAE
LIMA PELLUCIDA
LIMATULA SP.A
IUCINIDAE
DIVARICELLA 9UADRISULCATA
LINGA SP.A
LUCINA (LPIL)
LUCINA SONBRERENSIS
LUCINA SP.B
LUCINA SP.D
LUCINIDAE (LPIL)
PARVILUCINA HULTILINEATA
LYQNS1IDAE
LYONSIA SP.A
NESODESflATIDAE
ERVILIA CONCENTRICA
HYTILIDAE
CRENELLA DIVAR1CATA
NUCULIDAE
NUCULA AEGEENIS
E-54
-------
TAX0N0H1C LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/25/87
EPA-PENSACOIA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
8SS8S88SSS33SSSSSSS:SSSSSSSSSSSSS3SS8SSSnSSSS8SSSSSSSSSa»SSSSSSSSSSSSSS:S3SSSSS
PANDORIDAE
PANDORA (LPIL)
PANDORA BUSHIANA
PECTINIDAE
AR60PECTEN (LPIL)
PECTEN RAVENELI
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
PELECYPODA FAMILY D
SENELIDAE
SENELE BELLASTRIATA
SENELE NUCULOIDES
SEHELIDAE (LPIL)
SOLENYACIDAE
SOLEHYA VELUM
TELLINIDAE
STRI6ILLA (LPIL)
STRI6ILLA HIRABILIS
TELLINA (LPIL)
TELLINA AEQUISTRIATA
TELLINA LISTERI
TELLINA TEXANA
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
THRACIIDAE
BUSHIA SP.A
THYASIRIDAE
THYASIRA TRISINUATA
VENERIDAE
CHIONE (LPIL)
CHIONE INTAPURPUREA
CHI ONE LATILIRATA
60ULDIA CERINA
MACROCALLIST A HACULATA
PITAR FULHINATUS
PITAR SP.C
VENERIDAE (LPIL)
VERTICORD11DAE
VERTICORDIA ORNATA
POLYPLACOPHORA
POLYPLACOPHORA (LPIL)
SCAPHOPODA
SCAPHOPODA (LPIL)
SIPHONODENTALIIDAE
CADULUS (LPIL)
CADULUS A6ASSIZII
CADULUS SP.C
CADULUS TETRODON
PHORONIDA
PHORONIS (LPIL)
PLATYHELNINTHES
TURBELLARIA
TURBELLARIA (LPIL)
E-55
-------
TAXOMOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST 08/23/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED NOVEMBER 1987
SSS3SS8368SS3883333SSaSSSSSS33a3S8a8S3S8S3SS888S8aSSSSaS3SS3SeSS35SSSSS8SSS338«S
RHYNCHOCOELA
RHYNCHOCOELA (LPIL)
SIPUHCULA
SIPUHCULA (LPIL)
ASPID0S1PH0NI9AE
ASPIDOSIPHOH (LPIL)
ASPIOOSIPHON ALBUS
ASPIDOSIPHON HUELLERI
6QLFIN6I1DAE
G0LFIN6IA (LPIL)
PHASCOLION STROHBI
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
SIPUHCULA FAMILY C
SIPUNCULIDAE
SIPUNCULUS NUDUS
E-56
-------
SITE C APRIL 1987
Biological Community Parameters
Biomass Data
Taxonomic List
E-57
-------
SITE C
BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY PARAMETERS
EPA-PENSACOLA, FLORIDA Sample Date (YY/MM/DD): 87/04/27
Sample Type: MACROFAUNA Sample Area (sq. m.): 0.0079
STATION
TOTAL
MEAN TAKA
TOTAL NO.
HEAN
STANDARD
NUMBER
TAXA
PER REPL.
INDIVIDUALS
DENSITY
DEVIATION
H'
J'
D
101
168
45.5
1731
14607
6824
3.91
0.76
22.40
102
171
46.0
1408
11881
4347
4.19
0.81
23.45
103
170
43.4
1457
12295
4366
4.11
0.80
23.20
104
171
41.6
1589
13409
6103
3.78
0.74
23.06
105
173
42.4
1266
10683
3149
4.23
0.82
24.08
106
168
41.4
1157
9763
3662
4.31
0.84
23.68
107
141
27.4
774
6531
2000
3.97
0.80
21.05
108
170
41.0
1073
9054
2330
4.37
0.85
24.22
109
156
40.2
1511
12751
6321
3.85
0.76
21.17
110
177
45.6
1536
12962
4345
4.14
0.80
23.99
111
169
42.6
1726
14565
7565
3.72
0.73
22.54
112
175
43.8
1625
13713
4177
3.86
0.75
23.53
113
154
36.4
950
8016
2555
4.32
0.86
22.31
114
181
48.0
2033
17156
7785
3.82
0.73
23.63
US
170
46.4
1974
16658
9394
3.58
0.70
22.27
m
147
38.8
1330
11223
4435
3.99
0.78
23.08
117
174
47.6
1588
13400
4528
4.19
0.81
23.47
118
161
43.7
1583
13358
1928
3.89
0.77
21.72
119
178
49.2
2359
19907
7435
3.72
0.72
22.79
120
171
42.8
1247
10523
4192
4.31
0.84
23.85
E-58
-------
Wet
vtlght blomass
for
Pensaco!
La, Florida,
C Slct,
April
1987.
All valghcs
In grams.
STATION TAW
REP A
RET 1
REP C
REP R
REP E
REP F
REP t
REP N
REP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP H
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCl
AXXEUfift
0.054
0.011
0.007
0.010
0.023
0.014
0.011
0.009
0.009
O.OOJ
0.017
0.012
0.014
0.034
0.012
0.242
RFC I
MTmPOM
O.OOi
0.009
0.002
0.007
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.008
0.003
0.003
0.059
PfCI
nqllusci
0.020
0.007
0.028
0.032
0.233
0.004
0.024
0.022
0.003
0.018
0.003
0.008
0.094
0.134
0.002
0.474
PFCI
ECMWWHATA
0.001
0.074
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOO
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
0.084
PFCI
HISCELLAMEOUS
0.010
O.OM
6.060
O.OIS
0.022
0.014
O.OOI
0.009
0.007
0.005
0.010
0.014
0.008
0.001
0.007
0.130
TOTAL
0.064
0.108
0.036
0.049
0. JOS
0.0J7
O.OJ9
0.040
0.021
0.030
O.OJJ
0.037
0.127
0.199
0.024
1.189
STATION TAlCBI
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
REP fi
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP I
REP II
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC2
ANNELIDA
0.014
o.oto
0.012
0.01V
0.004
0.014
0.049
0.006
O.OJJ
0.017
0.011
0.038
0.012
0.011
0.043
0.299
PFCJ
JUtTMWOOA
0.004
0.008
O.OOJ
o.oev
O.OOJ
O.OOI
0.011
0.004
O.OOJ
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.010
0.012
0.003
0.084
PFC?
HOUUSCA
0.024
O.OJI
0.007
0.049
O.OU
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.023
0.019
0.015
0.033
0.04J
0.004
0.004
0.277
PFC2
ECMINQKRMTA
0.001
0.017
O.OOI
0.023
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.053
pfc2
MSCRLAffOUS
0.001
0.003
O.OOI
0.009
0.002
0.004
O.OOJ
0.020
0.004
0.001
O.OOI
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.071
TOTAL
0.046
0.071
0.024
0.107
0.020
0.02B
0.048
0.0J7
0.045
0.04J
0.0J4
0.080
0.0*8
0.032
0.057
0.764
STATION IAIQN
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP I
REP J
REP 1
REP L
REP n
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PFCJ
ANNELIDA
0.031
0.02J
0.008
0.012
0.003
0.017
0.004
0.012
0.023
0.078
0.015
0.010
0.026
0.0)4
0.014
0. J34
PFCJ
ARTHROPOD*
0.013
0.004
0.020
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.000
0.004
0.007
0.004
0.019
0.002
0.004
0.013
0.002
0.100
PfCJ
IWLLUSCA
0.012
0.024
0.010
0.010
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.007
0.002
0.097
0.020
O.OOJ
0.002
0.023
0.022
0.249
PfCJ
ECHINODEDIATA
O.OQJ
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.024
O.OOO
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
0.0(.
0.008
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.045
PFCJ
MISCELLANEOUS
0.004
0.002
0.048
0.004
O.OOI
O.OOJ
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
0.002
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.003
0.081
TOTAL
0.097
0.054
0.087
0.034
0.013
0.027
0.012
0.024
0.0J4
0.181
0.07'
0.023
0.034
0.032
0.044
0.609
STATION TAION
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
AEP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP n
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PfC4
ANNELIDA
0.014
0.021
0.042
0.023
0.028
0.024
0.009
0.004
0.005
O.OJ3
0.017
0.015
0.045
0.010
0.007
0.307
PfC4
ARTKROPODA
0.010
0.004
O.OOJ
0.003
O.OOI
0.005
O.OOJ
O.OOJ
0.004
0.004
O.OOJ
0.003
0.009
0.005
O.OOJ
0.069
PFCI
ROLIUSCA
0.021
0.031
0.047
0.044
0.017
0.011
0.012
O.OJJ
0.013
O.OIB
0.013
0.005
0.033
0.033
0.002
0.373
PFC4
ECHINODERHATA
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.023
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.014
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.034
PfC4
NISCaLWEOUS
0.001
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.008
0.005
0.004
0.399
0.004
O.OOI
0.034
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOI
0.4S0
TOTAL
0.049
0.079
0.117
O.OB!
0.07)
0.031
0.0J4
0.044
4.622
0.042
O.OU
0.040
0.091
0.031
0.014
1.4ft
STATION TAION
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP i
REP K
REP L
REP I*
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC3
ANHELIOA
0.014
0.028
0.024
0.028
0.017
O.OJJ
0.019
0.011
O.OOJ
0.0J9
0.035
O.OJ4
0.013
0.057
0.013
0.375
PfCJ
ARTKROPODA
O.OOi
0.002
O.OOJ
O.OOJ
0.004
0.012
0.005
0.014
0.004
0.020
0.011
0.007
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.108
PfC5
nOLLUSC*
0.004
0.020
0.011
0.005
0.049
0.038
0.023
0.004
0.010
0.017
0.001
0.097
0.043
0.04&
0.014
0.404
PFC5
ECHINODERHATA
0.007
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
0.008
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.212
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.267
PFC5
RISCELLAKOUS
O.OOI
0.001
0.002
0.021
0.004
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.025
0.010
0.003
0.020
0.023
0.014
0.002
O.OOI
0.134
TOT*
0.035
0.052
0.041
0.05B
0 097
0.092
0.049
0.058
0.269
0.062
0.047
0.144
0.076
0.109
0.037
1.268
STATION TAION
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
REP S
REP N
REP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP N
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC6
ANNELIDA
0.029
O.OOi
0.021
0.097
O.OIS
0.014
0.027
0.007
0.023
0.024
0.011
0.020
0.011
0.021
0.009
0.351
PFC4
ARTKROPODA
0.004
0.007
0.014
0.019
0.008
O.OOI
0.008
0.072
O.OOJ
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.034
0.003
0.134
PFtt
HOLLUSCA
0.019
0.005
0.014
0.217
0.014
1.012
0.020
0.007
0.017
0.678
0.110
0.002
0.009
0.090
0.043
2.462
PFC4
EOHNNEMRTA
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
0.011
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
0.072
ffCA
HISCCLLANEOUS
0.324
0.007
O.OOi
0.005
0.002
0.000
0.005
0.004
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.028
0.593
TOTAL
0.37b
0.024
0.044
O.UI
0.052
l.OJO
0.041
0.011
0.043
0.904
0.IJ2
0.031
0.023
0.131
0.084
J.562
STATION TAION
REP A
REPI
REP C
REP 9
REP E
REP F
REP &
REP H
REP I
REP J
rep r
REP L
REP H
REP 1
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC7
ANNELIDA
0.023
0.020
O.OU
O.OJI
0.014
0.020
O.OIS
0.024
0.015
0.032
O.OJ4
0.034
0.043
0.016
0.048
0.416
PFC7
ARTHROP8M
I.S07
O.OOJ
0.002
O.OOI
0.009
0.010
0.004
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOJ
0.008
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOJ
0.004
1.564
PPC7
HOLLUSCA
o.ow
0.010
0.017
0.008
0.007
0.012
0.004
0.004
0.011
0.003
0.017
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.137
PFC7
ECHMOOCRRATA
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
O.OOI
0.001
0.000
0.000
O.MI
0.013
PFC7
HlSCEUANEOUS
0.001
0.110
O.OOI
o.ooo
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OU
O.OOI
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.147
TOTAL
1.344
0.13
O.OJ4
0.044
O.OJJ
0.044
0.027
0.0J4
0.041
0.04J
0.04J
0.039
0.052
0.024
0.038
2.277
STATION TAION
REP A
REP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
REP F
REP i
REP H
REP I
REP J
REP K
REP L
REP n
REP 1
REP Q
TOTALS
PFCB
AJMUQA
o.oir
0.014
0.011
0.097
0.014
0.024
0.019
0.029
O.OU
0.009
0.018
0.022
0.010
O.OU
0.012
0.344
PFC8
ARTKROPODA
O.OOI
0.002
0.008
0.003
0.003
0.001
O.OOJ
0.005
0.006
0.002
0.002
O.OOJ
0.004
O.OOI
0.007
0.062
PFCfl
HOLLUSCA
0.719
0.027
0.032
0.005
O.OOJ
0.024
0.004
0.555
0.010
0.003
0.008
0.003
O.OU
0.011
0.051
1.412
PFC8
ECHINOfiERHATA
O.OOI
O.MI
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.000
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.013
PfC8
NISCELLUEQUS
O.OOI
O.OOJ
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.004
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.071
0.000
0.002
0.002
O.OOI
0.020
O.OOI
O.lll
TOTAL
0.746
0.047
0.03J
0.110
0.024
0.057
0.028
0.390
0.101
0.013
0.031
O.OJJ
0.030
0.046
0.072
2.003
E-59
-------
STATION TAION
KP A
KP 1
KP C
KP 0
KP I
KP F
REP 6
REP H
KP I
KP J
KP I
REP L
KP H
KP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC9
amelioa
0.015
0.010
0.029
O.OM
0.913
0.002
0.006
0.024
0.020
0.017
0.003
0.013
0.023
0.014
0.009
0.218
Pftt
AftTHWOU
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.001
0.901
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.012
0.004
0.030
0.003
9.014
O.OOI
9.003
0.091
PFCf
MJUUSCA
9.011
0.004
0.019
0.013
0.904
0.010
0.012
0.00!
0.023
0.009
0.002
0.014
0.018
0.024
9.003
0.149
PFCT
ECNINOKRMTA
0.000
0.024
0.001
0.002
0.901
0.008
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.OM
0.000
0.003
0.002
O.OOI
9.004
0.033
PFH
HlSCELAtfOUS
0.004
0.007
0.003
0.009
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.036
TOTAL
0.012
0.047
O.OSfl
0.033
0.921
0.028
0.028
o.ou
0.038
0.029
0.033
0.034
0.042
0.034
0.028
0.387
STATION TAION
Iff A
KP 1
REP C
REP 1
KP E
REP F
REP 6
REP N
REP 1
REP J
KP I
KP L
REP II
REP N
KP 0
TOTALS
PFC10
MQCL1DA
0.013
0.011
0.014
0.031
9.907
0.008
0.027
0.031
0.013
0.908
0.007
0.047
0.010
0.015
0.003
0.238
PfCIO
AATHMflKA
0.002
9.004
0.004
0.003
0.903
0.003
0.920
O.OM
0.013
0.007
0.008
0.005
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.100
PfCIO
IO.LUSCA
0.011
0.040
0.003
0.023
0.103
0.014
0.912
0.094
0.020
0.012
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.012
0.363
PfCIO
ECMHKIMM
O.OOt
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.MO
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
0.001
9.001
0.009
0.000
0.007
O.OOI
0.014
PfCIO
fllSCELLAKOUS
0.003
0.019
0.010
0.019
0.003
0.014
0.004
0.009
0.009
0.003
9.009
0.003
0.011
0.003
0.004
0.118
TOTAL
0.032
0.071
0.0)1
9.079
0.114
0.040
0.044
9.149
0.057
0.0!!
0.031
0.041
0.028
0.034
0.027
0.857
STATION TAW
KP A
KP 1
REP C
REP 1
REP 1
REP F
REP i
REP H
KP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP H
REP I
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCll
ANNELIM
0.047
0.019
0.019
0.023
0.020
9.023
0.023
0.015
0.022
0.029
0.018
0.003
0.006
0.005
0.013
0.287
Pf Cll
ARTWQPOM
o.m
0.004
0.009
0.002
0.004
0.003
0.913
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.005
O.OOI
0.014
0.017
0.093
PFCII
HOLLUSCA
o.ou
0.003
0.033
0.002
0.004
0.003
O.OOI
9.011
0.003
0.017
0.015
0.004
0.011
0.009
0.003
O.Ui
PfCll
CDilROKRItAIA
0.001
0.012
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.900
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
0.007
0.028
PFC11
MISCELLANEOUS
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
9.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.001
O.OOI
0.002
0.004
0.067
O.OW
TOTAL
0.109
0.041
0.043
0.029
0.033
0.031
0.043
9.031
0.029
0.038
o.ou
0.014
0.021
0.032
0.107
0.677
STATION TAION
REP A
KP 1
REP C
REP D
REP E
KP F
REP 6
REP H
KP I
REP J
REP K
KP L
REP II
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCl2
AHCLIDA
0.032
0.003
0.009
0.003
0.039
O.OIO
0.009
0.009
0.024
0.018
0.139
0.008
0.084
0.012
0.018
0.434
PfCl2
(unttopott
O.OOI
0.008
0.003
9.009
0.006
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.007
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.024
0.007
0.002
0.010
PFC12
ULLDSCA
0.006
0.009
0.032
9.032
0.017
0.040
0.005
0.003
0.044
0.023
0.013
0.012
0.068
0.014
0.038
O.JW
PfCI2
EDMNQKMATA
0.000
0.001
o.cot
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
O.OOI
0.002
O.OOI
O.OOI
0.013
PfCI2
MSCOLAtfOUS
0.005
0.002
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.077
0.003
0.002
0.059
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.034
0.204
TOTAL
0.044
0.023
0.071
9.047
0.083
0.042
0.022
0.094
0.079
0.049
0.218
0.023
0.182
0.039
0.093
I.I!!
STATION TAIQM
KP A
REP 1
KP C
KP 1
REP E
kp r
REP t
REP H
KP 1
REP J
KP K
REP L
KP II
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PKI3
HBaiH
0.015
0.019
O.OM
0.018
o.ou
0.012
O.OM
0.003
0.018
0.011
0.011
O.OU
0.004
0.007
0.024
0.771
PfCI3
AftTWOPSM
0.029
0.002
0.076
0.029
0.003
0.003
9.017
0.002
0.006
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.007
0.003
0.006
0.202
PfCI3
MLLUSCA
0.005
0.003
0.011
0.014
0.013
0.276
0.015
0.010
0.006
0.044
0.216
0.541
0.017
0.018
0.014
1.22!
pfcn
CCMINQSEMATA
0.002
0.00!
0.001
9.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
9.901
0.001
1.771
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
O.OOI
O.OOI
1.783
PfCIJ
AlSCfLLANEOUS
0.004
0.011
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.010
0.003
0.001
0.402
0.003
0.000
0.002
0.003
0.007
0.005
0.068
TOTAL
O.ttl
0.034
0.178
0.049
0.031
0.312
9.043
0.019
0.033
1.834
0.231
0.384
0.032
O.OU
0.032
3.349
STATION TAIOI
KP A
KP 1
REP C
SEP 0
REP E
KP F
KP fi
KP H
REP I
REP i
REP K
REP L
REP n
REP I
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCl4
ANNELIM
0.013
0.021
0.021
0.028
0.007
O.OIJ
0.044
0.013
0.002
0.011
O.OU
O.OOI
0.032
0.133
0.014
0.391
PfCH
ARTMUHO*
0.003
o.oie
0.004
0.004
0.004
9.001
9.004
0.002
0.013
0.001
0.06*
0.004
0.009
0.006
0.003
0.084
PfCI4
IttlUSCA
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.021
9.003
0.038
0.095
0.004
0.003
O.Ow
0.003
0.009
0.035
0.005
O.Jlf
PfCH
CCHIMOKMATA
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.091
9.033
9.001
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.944
PfC14
ftlSCtUANEQUS
0.001
0.001
0.009
0.048
0.006
9.001
O.OU
0.000
0.003
0.006
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.043
0.003
9.189
TOTAL
0.027
0.044
0.040
0.063
0.041
9.033
9.142
O.tll
0.023
0.022
0.049
0.011
0.031
0.219
0.029
0.947
STATION TAIQM
REP A
REP 1
REP C
KP 0
REP E
CP F
REP 6
KP H
KP 1
REP J
KP K
KP L
REP H
REP *
REP 0
TOTALS
PfCl3
MOaiDA
0.022
0.024
0.004
0.016
0.032
9.013
9.004
0.002
0.017
0.039
0.027
0.017
0.022
0.038
0.049
0.330
PfCI5
ARTKRQPttA
4.003
0.007
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.003
O.OOI
0.017
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.018
O.OOI
0.003
9.977
PfCIS
ROLLVSCA
2.534
0.03S
0.033
0.007
0.004
0.024
0.003
0.034
0.004
0.028
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.024
0.008
2.734
PfClS
(CHIKOOEAflATA
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
O.OOI
0.091
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.008
O.OOI
0.002
0.002
O.OOI
0.022
PfCIS
niSCCHANCOUS
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.134
0.003
0.002
9.001
9.902
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.002
0.004
9.202
TOTAL
2.343
0.070
0.047
0.184
0.043
0.046
0.014
9.939
0.043
0.073
0.048
0.028
0.031
0.047
0.063
3.3B7
STATION TAION
KP A
REP 1
KP C
REP 1
KP E
KP f
REP 6
REP H
KP 1
REP J
REP i
KP L
rep n
KP N
KP 0
TOTALS
PFC16
AKOL18A
O.OM
0.041
0.044
0.020
0.039
0.030
0.020
9.012
0.015
0.021
0.063
0.030
0.040
0.027
9.043
0.373
PFCU
AATMtOPOM
0.149
9.001
0.004
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
9.003
0.004
0.004
0.000
0.004
0.002
0.109
PfC16
IOXUSCA
0.037
0.016
0.078
0.000
0.004
0.033
0.092
9.033
0.020
0.032
0.017
0.001
0.037
0.012
O.OOI
0.221
PTC16
EOUNOKRMTA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.002
O.OOI
0.001
9.001
0.090
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
O.OOI
0.003
0.013
PfCti
RlSCCLUtfOU!
0.001
0.007
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
O.OOI
0.002
0.900
0.001
9.001
0.030
total
0.234
0.091
0.132
0.023
0.048
0.091
0.027
0.033
0.037
0.038
0.087
0.039
0.077
0.045
0.074
1.138
E-60
-------
STATION TAION
REP A
MP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
REP 1
REP J
REP K
REP I
REP H
REP N
REP 0
totals
PFCI7
ANNELIDA
0.015
0.023
0.009
0.048
0.007
0.018
0.013
0.007
0.034
0.008
0.023
0.033
0.028
0.032
0,020
0.330
ffCl 7
fWTWlOPOOA
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.010
0.003
0.004
0.007
0.049
PFCI7
BOILUSCA
0.033
0.004
0.003
0.208
0.003
0.043
0.020
0.026
0.004
0.013
0.022
0.032
0.003
0.018
0.002
0.«54
PFCI7
[GHINOOERRATA
0.001
0.001
0.038
0.000
0.001
o.oot
0.001
0.001
0.001
o.oot
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.031
PFCI7
MSCELLANtOUS
0.014
0.019
0.001
0.013
0.003
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.006
0.007
0.023
0.002
0.0)0
0.003
0.004
0.141
TOTAL
0.066
0.vS4
0.032
0.273
0.019
0.049
0.039
0.042
0.030
0.033
0.073
0.098
0.047
0.042
0.044
1.047
STATION TAION
REP A
*EP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP f
REP 4
REP H
REP I
REP J
REP K
REP L
SEP n
REP N
REP 0
TOTALS
PFC18
AUEUOA
Q.034
0,024
0.013
0.010
0.032
O.WS
0.024
0.017
0.014
0.019
0.018
o.on
0.028
0.011
0,031
0.346
PfClB
ARTHROPOD!
0.002
0.002
0.009
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.013
0.003
0.003
4.019
0.001
0.002
0.008
0.009
0.003
0.08ft
PFcie
ROILUSCA
0.030
0.003
0.011
0.139
0.031
0.044
0.004
0.019
•i 028
0.339
0.014
0.018
0.J14
0.004
0.014
1.058
PFCI8
EQIINODEMATA
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
v. 001
0.001
0.383
o.oot
0.000
0.000
0.001
0,393
fFCIS
MISCELLANEOUS
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.001
0.383
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.013
0.001
0.001
0.470
0.002
0.003
0.902
TOTAL
0.071
9.034
0.039
0.137
0.088
0.447
0.030
0.042
0 031
0.423
0.617
0.044
0.820
0.028
0.034
2.987
STATION TAIQN
REP A
KP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP H
SEP 1
REP J
REP I
REP L
REP n
REP *
REP a
TOTALS
PfClt
AINELiM
0.034
o.oie
0.031
0.012
0.031
0.028
0.020
0.069
0.014
0.004
0.020
0.027
0.013
0.011
0.013
0.347
PFCI9
ARIHROPOM
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.003
0.0*4
PFCI9
W.UISU
0.012
0.013
0.033
0.042
0.026
0.488
0.337
0.003
0.002
3.634
0.614
0.028
0.492
0.597
0.740
7.Ill
PFCI9
ECHINODERMTA
0.001
0.401
0.001
0.000
0.004
0.001
0.401
0.000
0.03B
0.001
0.001
0.001
O.M!
0.001
0.001
O.M'j
PFCI9
fllSCElLANEQUS
0.003
4.011
0.003
0.004
0.018
0.010
0.023
0.014
0.006
0.003
0.010
0.011
0.002
0.009
0.017
0.148
TOTAL
0.0)7
0.031
0.074
0.044
0.083
0.331
0.384
0.092
0.042
3.447
0.431
0.073
0.310
0.622
0.794
7.723
STATION TAIQN
HEP A
REP 1
REP C
REP 0
REP E
REP F
REP 6
REP tt
REP 1
REP J
REP t
REP L
REP It
REP N
rep a
TOTALS
PFC20
AKNEUOft
0.075
0.011
0.027
0.018
0.011
0.043
0.014
0.021
0.004
0.010
0.013
0.012
0.012
0.007
0.0)1
0.2i9
PfC20
AfiTHWWBA
0.010
0.004
0.002
0.009
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.00)
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.019
PFC20
NUUSCA
0.002
0.027
0.043
1.004
0.003
0.004
0.028
0.043
0.004
0.004
O.OM
0.018
0.003
0.021
0.047
0.267
PfC20
ECHlNOKfUIATA
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
O.OOI
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
O.OM
0.001
0.001
0.001
4.010
0.021
PFC20
NISCELLANEOUS
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.022
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.008
0.011
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.079
TOTAL
0.039
0.033
0.074
0.034
0.023
0.037
0.068
0.078
0.01)
0.014
O.C..
0.043
0.026
0.037
0.093
0.69'
E-61
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
*LPIL - Lowest Practicable
Identification Level
ANNELIDA
QLI60CHAETA
OLIEOCHAETA (LPIL)*
POLVCHAETA
AHPHARETIDAE
AHPHARETE SP.A
AHPHARETIDAE (LPIL)
ISOLDA PULCHELLA
HELINNA NACULATA
SABELLIDES SP.A
ANPHINOHIDAE
CHLOEIA VIRIDIS
PARAHPHINQHE SP.B
APHRODITIDAE
APHRQGENIA SP.A
ARABELLIDAE
DRILONEREIS LONGA
CAPITELLIDAE
CAP I TELL IDAE (LPIL)
MEDIOHASTUS (LPIL)
N0T0HASTU5 (LPIL)
CHAETOPTERIDAE
SPIOCHAETOPTERUS OCULATUS
CHRYSOPETALIDAE
BHANANIA HETEROSETA
PALEANOTUS SP.A
CIRRATULIDAE
CAULLERIELLA CF. ALATA
CHAETQZONE (LPIL)
CHAETOZONE SP.A
CIRRATULIDAE (LPIL)
THARYX (LPIL)
THARYX CF. ANNULOSUS
DORVILLEIDAE
DORVILLEIDAE (LPIL)
PETTIBONEIA DUOFURCA
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
SCHIST0HERIN60S CF. RUDOLPHI
SCHIST0MERIN60S PECTINATA
SCHISTOMERINGOS SP.D
EULEPETHIDAE
EULEPETHIDAE (LPIL)
ERUBEULEPIS SP.A
EUNICIDAE
EUNICE VITTATA
EUNICIDAE (LPIL)
LYSIDICE SP.B
HARPHYSA SANGUINEA
FLABELLI6ERJ DAF
THEROCHAETA SP.A
E-62
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
GLYCERIDAE
GLYCERA (LPIL)
GLYCERA SP.A
60NIAOIDAE
GONIAOA LITTOREA
60NIADIDAE (LPIL)
GONIADIDES CAROL INAE
HESIONIDAE
HESIONIDAE (LPIL)
HETEROPODARKE FORMALIS
HETEROPODARKE LYONSI
PODARKEOPSIS LEVIFUSCINA
LUHBRINERIDAE
LUHBRINERIDAE (LPIL)
LUHBRINERIDES DAY I
LUHBRINERIS (LPIL)
LUHBRINERIS JANUARII
LUHBRINERIS LATREILLI
LUHBRINERIS SP.D
LUHBRINERIS VERRILLI
HAGELONIDAE
HAGELONA (LPIL)
HA6EL0NA PETTIBONEAE
HAGELONA SP.B
HAGELONA SP.C
HALDANIDAE
AXIOTHELLA HUCOSA
AXIOTHELLA SP.A
BOGUEA ENI6HATICA
BOGUEA SP.A
HALDANIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYIDAE
AGLAOPNAHUS VERRILLI
NEPHTYIDAE (LPIL)
NEPHTYS PICTA
NEPHTYS SIMONI
NEREIDAE
CERATOCEPHALE OCULATA
NEREIDAE (LPIL)
NEREIS HICROHHA
RULLIERINEREIS SP.A
ONUPHIDAE
DIOPATRA CUPREA
KINBERGONUPHIS SP.E
H00RE0NUPH1S PALLIDULA
ONUPHIDAE (LPIL)
ONUPHIS EREHITA OCULATA
RHAHPHOBRACHIUH SP.C
OPHELIIDAE
ARMANDIA MACULATA
E-63
-------
TAXQNOHIC LISTING
TAXONQHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
OPHELIA DENTICULATA
TRAVISIA HOBSONAE
ORBINI1DAE
LEITOSCOLOPLOS (LPIL)
ORBINIA RISERI
SCOLOPLOS SP.H
OWEN11DAE
6ALATH0WENIA OCULATA
OWEN1A SP.A
OWENIIDAE (LPIL)
PARAONIDAE
ARICIDEA (LPIL)
ARIC1DEA CATHERINAE
ARICIDEA CERRUTII
ARICIDEA PHILBINAE
ARICIDEA SP.A
ARICIDEA SP.E
ARICIDEA SP.H
ARICIDEA SP.L
ARICIDEA SP.X
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
ARICIDEA MASS I
CIRROPHORUS (LPIL)
CIRROPHORUS BRANCH IATUS
LEV1NSENIA GRACILIS
PARAONIS PY60ENI6HATICA
PECTINARIIDAE
PECTINARIA (LPIL)
PECTINARIA 60ULDII
PECTINARIIDAE (LPILI
PHYLLODOCIDAE
ETEONE LACTEA
6ENETYLLIS SP.A
HESIONURA SP.A
NYSTIDES BOREALIS
PHYLLODOCIDAE (LPIL)
PILARGIDAE
SIGAHBRA BASSI
SYNELHIS EUINGI
POECILOCHAETIDAE
POECILOCHAETUS (LPIL)
POLYGORDIIDAE
P0LY60RDIUS (LPIL)
PQLYNOIDAE
HARHOTHOE (LPIL)
HARHOTHOE SP.B
POLYNOIDAE (LPIL)
SABELLARIIDAE
SABELLARIA SP.A
E-64
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEKSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 19B7
3SSSSSSSSS5SSSSSSSS:SS:SSSSSSSS6SS88SSSS8S33S:SSSSSSS3SSSSSSSSSS
SABELLIDAE
CHONE (LPIL)
EUCHONE (LPIL)
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
POTANILLA (LPIL)
POTANILLA SP.E
SABELLIDAE (LPIL)
SACCOCIRRIDAE
SACCOCIRRUS SP.A
SERPULIOAE
SERPULIDAE (LPIL)
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
SIGALIONIOAE
SI6ALI0N SP.A
SIGALIONIDAE (LPIL)
SPIONIDAE
AONIDES PAUC1BRANCH1ATA
DISPIO UNCINATA
LAONICE CIRRATA
MALACOCEROS (LPIL)
MALACOCERQS INDICUS
PARAPRIONOSPIO PINNATA
POLYDORA CORNUTA
POLYDORA SOCIAUS
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
SCOLELEPIS SQUANATA
SPIO PETTIBONEAE
SPIONIDAE (LPIL)
SPIOPHANES BOMBYX
SPIOPHANES CF. H1SSIONENSIS
SYLLIDAE
BRAN IA WELLFLEETENSIS
EURYSYLLIS TUBERCULATA
EXOGONE ATLANTICA
EXOGONE DISPAR
EXOGONE- LOUREI
OP1STHODONTA SP.A
PARAPIQNOSYLLIS L0N6ICIRRATA
PIONOSYLLIS GESAE
PLAKOSYLLIS QUADRIOCULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS ACICULATA
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEAE
SYLLIDAE (LPIL)
SYLLIDES FULVUS
TYPOSYLLIS (LPIL)
TYPOSYLLIS AtlICA
TYPOSYLLIS CF. LUTEA
TEREBELLIDAE
LOINIA SP.A
E-65
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOMIC SPECIES LIST 09/11/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
33338838388853833333383333333338833333333833388883338883838338388888333333838333
POLYCIRRUS (LPIL)
TEREBELLIDAE (LPIL)
TRICHOBRANCHIDAE
TRICHOBRANCHUS 6LACIALIS
ARTHROPODA (CRUSTACEA)
CRUSTACEA (LPIL)
AHPHIPODA
AHPHIPODA (LPIL)
AHPELISCIDAE
AHPELISCA (LPIL)
AHPELISCA A6ASSIZI
AHPELISCA BICARINATA
AHPELISCA SP.C
AHPELISCA SP.L
AHPELISCA SP.N
AHPHILOCHIDAE
AHPHILQCHUS SP.C
6ITANA (LPIL)
6ITAN0PSIS (LPIL)
AORIDAE
ACUHINQDEUTOPUS (LPIL)
ACUHINODEUTOPUS NA6LEI
ACUHINODEUTOPUS SP.A
LEHBOS (LPIL)
LEHBOS SMITH!
HICRODEUTOPUS HYERSI
UNCIOLA (LPIL)
UNCIOLA SP.B
ARIEISSIDAE
AR6ISSA HAHATIPES
COROPHIIDAE
COROPHIUH (LPIL)
COROPHIUH ACHERUSICUH
COROPHIUH SP.L
HAUSTORIIDAE
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS (LPIL)
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS SP.B
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS SP.H
ACANTHOHAUSTORIUS SP.L
PROTOHAUSTORIUS (LPIL)
PROTOHAUSTORIUS BOUSFIELDI
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.E
PROTOHAUSTORIUS SP.6
ISAEIDAE
HEGAHPHOPUS SP.A
PHOTIS (LPIL)
PHOTIS HELAMICUS
PHOTIS SP.O
ISCHYROCERIDAE
ERICHTHONIUS BRASILIENSIS
E-66
-------
TAIQNOHIC LISTING
TAXONONIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
8883833888833333333333588338888383338833383;
09/11/87
LILJEB0R61IDAE
LILJEB0R6IA SP.A
LISTRIELLA SP.F
LYSIANASSIDAE
HIPPOHEDON SP.A
HIPPOHEDON SP.B
LYSI All ASSA (LPIL)
LYSIANASSA ALBA
LYSIANASSIDAE (LPIL)
HELITIDAE
ELASHOPUS SP.C
QEOICEROTIDAE
HONOCULODES NYEI
SYNCHELIDIUM ANERICANUH
PHOXQCEPHALIOAE
HETHARPINA FLORIDANA
PLATYISCHNOPIOAE
EUDEVENOPUS HONOURANUS
POOOCERIDAE
POOOCERUS SP.B
STENOTHOIDAE
PARAMETOPELLA CYPRIS
PARAHETOPELLA SP.A
PARAHETOPELLA SP.B
STENOTHOE (LPIL)
SYNOPIIDAE
6AR0SYRRH0E SP.B
SYNOPIIDAE (LPIL)
TIRQN TRIOCELLATUS
TIRON TROPAKIS
CUNACEA
CUNACEA (LPIL)
6000TRIIDAE
CYCLASPIS (LPIL)
CYCLASPIS SP.D
CYCLASPIS SP.N
CYCLASPIS SP.O
CYCLASPIS UNICORNIS
DIASTYLIDAE
OXYUROSTYLIS (LPIL)
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.B
OXYUROSTYLIS SP.C
NANNASTACIDAE
CANPYLASPIS SP.I
CANPYLASPIS SP.N
CAHPYLASPIS SP.O
CUHELLA SP.G
CUNELLA SP.H
DECAPQDA (NATANTIA)
DECAPOOA NATANTIA (LPIL)
E-67
-------
TAKONOHIC LISTING
TAXOHOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PEHSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
3:333333333333333333333333333333333*3=3333333333333333338333333333333333333338X3
PASIPHAEIDAE
LEPTOCHELA PAPULATA
PROCESS I DAE
PROCESSA HEMPHILLI
SICYONIIDAE
SICYONIA TYPICA
SOLENOCERIDAE
SOLENOCERA ATLANTIDIS
DECAPODA (REPTANTIA)
DECAPODA REPTANTIA (LPIL)
ALBUNEIDAE
ALBUKEA GI8BESII
CALAPPIDAE
CYCLOES BAIRDII
DROhlIDAE
HYPOCONCHA ARCUATA
S0NEPLAC1DAE
6LYPT0PLAX ShITHII
LEUCOSIIDAE
SPELOEQPHORUS PONTIFER
MAJIDAE
BATRACHONOTUS FRA60SUS
PAEURIDAE
PAGURIDAE (LPIL)
PARTHENOPIDAE
CRYPTOPODIA CONCAVA
PINNOTHERIDAE
DISSODACTYLUS (LPIL)
DISSODACTYLUS SP.B
PARAPINNIXA BOUVIERI
PINNOTHERES OSTREUH
PINNOTHERIDAE (LPIL)
ISOPODA
ANTHURIDAE
APANTHURA RA6NIFICA
ANT IASIDAE
ANTIAS SP.B
IDOTEIOAE
EDOTEA LYONSI
SEROLIDAE
SEROLIS HERAYI
LEPTOSTRACA
NEBALIIDAE
NEBALIA BIPES
hYSIDACEA
HYSIDACEA (LPIL)
HYSIOAE
AhATHIHYSIS BRATTE6ARDI
ANCK1ALINA TYPICA
E-68
-------
TAXOMOHIC LISTING
TAXONOMIC SPECIES LIST 09/11/87
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
333S3SB3S3BX8333333333aSS3333S33333333S833333S=33S3333333X3S3S33SS=33333S33SS33;
BOUMANIELLA PORTORICENSIS
MYSIDOPSIS FURCA
PROHVSIS ATLANTICA
OSTRACODA
OSTRACODA (LPIL)
CYLINDROLEBERIDIDAE
ANBOLEBERIS AMERICANA
ASTEROPELLA HACLAUfiHLINAE
ASTER0PTERY6ION OCULITRISTIS
PARASTEROPE SP.A
SYNASTEROPE (LPIL)
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY H
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
PH HOMED I DAE
HARBANSUS PAUCICHELATUS
PSEUDOPHILOHEDES (LPIL)
PSEUDOPHILOHEDES AMBON
PSEUDOPHILOMEDES FERULANUS
PSEUDOPHILOHEDES POLYANCISTRUS
PSEUDOPHILOHEDES ZETA
RUTIDERHATIDAE
RUTIDERMA DARBY I
SARSIELLIDAE
EURYPYLUS (LPIL)
EURYPYLUS SP.A
EURYPYLUS SP.B
EUSARSIELLA (LPIL)
EUSARSIELLA CARINATA
EUSARSIELLA OISPARALIS
EUSARSIELLA ELOFSONI
EUSARSIELLA 6ETTLES0NI
EUSARSIELLA 6I6ACANTHA
EUSARSIELLA PILLIPOLLICIS
EUSARSIELLA RADIICOSTA
EUSARSIELLA SP.E
TRACHYLEBERIDIDAE
ACTINQCYTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.A
RETICULOCYTHEREIS SP.B
TANAIDACEA
TANAIDACEA (LPIL)
APSEUDIDAE
APSEUOES PROPINQUUS
APSEUDES SP.H
KALLIAPSEUDIDAE
KALLIAPSEUDES (LPIL)
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.A
E-69
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAKONQHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACQLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
SSSSSS3SS3SSSSSSS38S3SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS33333SS8SS3S3SSr8S
KALLIAPSEUOES SP.B
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.C
KALLIAPSEUOES SP.D
LEPTOCHELIDAE
LEPTOCHELIA SP.D
NOTOTANA1DAE
TANAISSUS SP.A
BRACHIOPODA
BRACHIOPODA (LPIL)
CEPHALOCHORDATA
LEPTOCARDII
BRANCHIOSTOHIDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA (LPIL)
BRANCHIOSTOHA FLORIDAE
BRANCHIOSTOHA L0N6IROSTRUM
CNIDARIA
ACTINIARIA
ACTINIARIA (LPIL)
ANTHOZOA (PENNATULACEA)
PENNATULACEA (LPIL)
ECHINODERHATA
ASTEROIDEA
ASTEROIDEA (LPIL)
ASTROPECTINIOAE
ASTROPECTEN (LPIL)
ECHINQIDEA
ECHINQIDEA (LPIL)
HELLITIDAE
ENCOPE ABERRANS
HOLOTHUROIDEA
HOLOTHUROIDEA (LPIL)
OPHIUROIDEA
OPHIUROIDEA (LPIL)
ANPHIURIDAE
AHPHIODIA TRYCHNA
HEMI CHORDATA
ENTEROPNEUSTA
BALANOGLOSSUS AURANTIACUS
MOLLUSCA
APLACOPHORA
APLACOPHORA (LPIL)
6ASTR0P0DA
EASTROPODA (LPIL)
ACLIDIDAE
ACLIDIDAE GENUS A
ACTEOCINIDAE
' ACTEOCINA CANDEI
ACTEONIDAE
ACTEON PUNCTOSTRIATUS
E-70
-------
TAIONOMIC LISTIK6
TAIONQH1C SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
S888888888SS833338333333SS3888SS888SSS388S33S83838S3SSSS33SSSS5S33SSS3S3S3333383
CAECIDAE
CAECUM (LPIL)
CAECUM CUBITATUH
CAECUM IHBRICATUM
CAECUM PULCHELLUM
CAECUM SP.A
CAECUM SP.C
COLUHBELLIDAE
AHACHIS LAFRESNAYI
NASSARINA 6LYPTA
CONIDAE
CONUS FLORIDANUS FLQRIDENSIS
CREPIDULIDAE
CALYPTRAEA CENTRALIS
CREPIDULA (LPIL)
CREPIOULA MACULOSA
CREPIDULIDAE (LPIL)
CYCLOSTREMATIDAE
ARENE TRICARINATA
EPI TON11DAE
EPITONIUH (LPIL)
MAR6INELLIDAE
6RANULINA OVULIFORMIS
NAR6INELLA (LPIL)
MAR6INELLA SP.C
MELANELLIDAE
MELANELLIDAE (LPIL)
NISO AEGLEES
STROMBIFORHIS (LPIL)
NAT1CIDAE
NATICA PUSILLA
NATICIDAE (LPIL)
POLINICES LACTEUS
SI6ATICA SENISULCATA
OLIVIDAE
JASPIBELLA SP.A
OLIVELLA (LPIL)
OLIVELLA ADELAE
PYRAHIDELLIDAE
TURBONILLA (LPIL)
TURBONILLA CONRADI
RETUSIDAE
VOLVULELLA PERSIHILIS
TROCHIDAE
TROCHIDAE &ENUS C
TURRIDAE
CERODRILLIA THEA
CRY0TURR1S CITRONELLA
INODRILLIA SP.A
E-71
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAKONOHIC SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
09/11/87
KURTZIELLA RUBELLA
TURRIDAE (LPIL)
TURRIDAE GENUS K
TURRITELLIDAE
TURRITELLA ACROPORA
NUDIBRANCHIft
NUDIBRANCHIA (LPIL)
PELECYPODA
PELECYPODA (LPIL)
CARD!TI DAE
PLEUROHERIS TRIDENTATA
CORBULIDAE
C0RBUL1DAE (LPIL)
CRASSATELLIDAE
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
CUSPIDARIIDAE
CARDIONYA (LPIL)
BLYCYHERIDIDAE
GLYCYHERIS (LPIL)
LIHIDAE
LIMATULA SP.A
LIHIDAE (LPIL)
LUCINIDAE
LINBA PENSYLVANICA
LUCINA NASSULA
LUCINA SOMBRERENSIS
LUCINA SP.A
LUCINA SP.B
LUCINA SP.D
LUCINIDAE (LPIL)
LYONSIIDAE
LYONSIA SP.A
HYTILIDAE
CRENELLA DIVARICATA
HUSCULUS LATERALIS
NUCULIDAE
NUCULA AE6EENIS
NUCULA PROXIHA
PANDORIDAE
PANDORA (LPIL)
PANDORA ARENOSA
PANDORA BUSHIANA
PANDORA TRILINEATA
PECTINIDAE
PECTINIDAE (LPIL)
SEHELIDAE
SEHELE BELLASTRIATA
SEMELE NUCULOIDES
SEHELIDAE (LPIL)
E-72
-------
TAXONOHIC LISTING
TAXONOH1C SPECIES LIST
EPA-PENSACOLA—SITE C—-COLLECTED APRIL 1987
SS38SS838SSS33SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS38S3833SSS3SS33S3SSSSSSSSSS
SOLEHYACIDAE
SOLENYA VELUM
SDLENIDAE
ENSIS HlHOft
SOLENIOAE (LPIL)
TELLINIDAE
STRI6ILLA HIRABILIS
TELLINA AEQU1STRIATA
TELL IHA LISTERI
TELLINA TE1ANA
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
TELLINIDAE (LPIL)
THRACIIDAE
BUSH!A SP.A
THYAS1RIOAE
THYASIRA TRISINUATA
UN6UL1NIDAE
DIPLODQNTA SP.C
VENERIDAE
CHIONE (LPIL)
CHIONE INTAPURPUREA
MACROCALLISTA HACULATA
PITAR (LPIL)
VENERIDAE ILPIL)
VERT ICORD11DAE
VERTICORDIA ORNATA
POLYPLACOPHORA
POLYPLACOPHORA (LPIL)
SCAPHOPODA
SCAPHOPODA (LPIL)
DENTALIIDAE
DENTAL IUH (LPIL)
SIPHONQDENTAL11DAE
CADULUS SP.C
CADULUS TETRODQN
PHORONIDA
PHORONIS (LPIL)
PLATYHELMNTHES
TURBELLARIA
TURBELLARIA (LPIL)
RHYNCHOCOELA
RHYNCHOCOELA (LPIL)
SIPUNCULA
S1PUNCULA (LPIL)
ASPIDOSIPHONIDAE
ASPIDOSIPHON (LPIL)
ASPIDOSIPHON ALBUS
ASPIDOSIPHON MUELLERI
60LFIN6IIDAE
ROLFIM&iA (LPIL)
E-73
-------
TAIONOHIC LISTING
TAXQNOHIC SPECIES LIST 09/11/07
EPA-PEHSACQLfl—SITE C—COLLECTED APRIL 1987
sssssssssasssssssssssssssssssssssassrsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss:
PHASCOLION STROKBl
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
SIPUNCULA FAMILY C
E-74
-------
DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS
E-75
-------
8
16
13
20
19
18
17
5
10 '
3
15 •
12-
6-
4-
9 •
2-
1-
11-
14-
-JD
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
Q-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE B; NOVEMBER, 1986
E-76
-------
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
CAECUM SP. A
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
PARAMPHINOME SP. B
EUSARSIELLA ELOFSONI
AMPELISCA AGASSIZI
CYCLASPIS UNICORNIS
CYCLASPIS SP. D
LEPTOCHELIA SP. D
EXOGONE LOUREI
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
TYPOSYLLIS AMICA
PLEUROMERIS TRIDENTATA
APSEUDES SP. H
ELASMOPUS Sf>. C
BHAWANIA HETEROSETA
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEI
HARBANSUS PAUCICHELATUS
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
METHARPINA FLORIDANA
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
LYSIDICE SP. B
TRICHOBRANCHUS GLACIALIS
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEA
ASPIDOSIPHON MUELLERI
CAECUM CUBITATUM
CAECUM IMBRICATUM
CAECUM PULCHELLUM
GONIADIDES CAROLINAE
MICRODEUTOPUS MYERSI
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
2
b
3a
3b
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
R-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE B; NOVEMBER, 1986
E-77
-------
Data matrix of station and species groups compiled from classification analysis doidrograms for Pensacola, ft, survey, "B" site, Novenier 1986.
ABC D E
STATION:
8
16
13
20
19
18
17
5
10
3
15
12
6
4
9
2
1
11
14
7
06TRAC0DA FAMILY I
31
84
144
39
147
45
50
92
62
88
107
158
147
176
245
71
17
130
20
78
ACNIDeS PHJCIHUNCHIAEA
10
51
0
44
51
41
71
67
70
80
50
53
62
63
61
72
56
72
50
9
1 CAEOM SP.A
1
0
0
4
14
2
32
16
33
110
44
60
78
34
155
41
48
11
54
82
FAERICICLA TKUCBAXA
19
13
0
3
8
7
21
8
35
11
30
19
30
18
86
28
41
18
12
86
PARAfFHUOE SP.B
2
2
1
22
14
24
5
17
11
11
38
55
11
23
86
37
21
23
15
42
HJSARSIEIJ A ELOFSGNI
14
25
41
4
1
4
7
15
23
7
5
16
10
16
25
19
8
12
13
7
MFEUSCA AGASSIZI
4
38
9
2
8
8
15
18
21
21
9
21
23
24
17
30
13
9
6
16
CTOASPIS UNI03RNIS
10
9
13
11
8
10
23
5
21
11
24
12
12
9
15
18
4
5
33
13
CKOASPIS SP.D
13
6
24
1
7
4
30
5
13
10
10
5
14
13
3
17
9
13
15
12
2 LHTOOfiUA SP.D
22
23
29
181
59
30
25
19
34
7
27
11
27
27
20
16
30
24
11
21
BSOGOC U3JREI
7
19
22
5
12
21
25
19
24
10
13
17
7
42
6
18
16
56
8
0
CRASSINELLA UJNULAIA
6
1
6
10
21
11
8
22
7
15
35
15
8
14
20
20
10
11
18
3
TYPOSYLLIS AMICA
10
3
28
6
36
17
33
41
5
8
25
14
20
15
28
8
11
19
10
5
FLHBOERIS TfUDQTCAXA
12
5
21
2
2
2
60
33
36
72
12
21
22
16
34
40
20
0
34
30
AFSHJEEj SP.H
0
2
5
7
18
12
2
14
0
4
8
11
14
27
22
16
30
10
14
10
)a ELA90FUS SP.C
11
0
18
42
31
49
5
11
0
7
8
39
44
26
42
16
16
15
3
3
IBAMMOA HnEKSEIA
1
0
2
58
30
27
2
6
2
2
16
7
9
5
21
9
10
I
3
2
SFHAEROSYLLIS PTRIFHiOPSIS
0
0
0
3
2
1
0
3
22
29
13
22
32
- 15
35
15
29
52
28
9
,b FRtJTODCKVILLZA KEFERSIEINI
0
0
0
8
17
9
0
8
26
35
22
14
15
2
103
6
13
5
11
48
HARBAMsUS PAUCKMIATUS
34
12
33
4
2
5
11
7
5
2
3
4
1
6
2
8
5
2
5
2
TWJ.TKA VHSIOOUCR
39
55
34
7
13
2
28
17
6
3
4
4
9
14
8
13
2
5
5
1
MHHARP1NA FLORIDANA
7
20
11
10
16
7
8
15
5
3
11
7
2
7
3
2
5
7
4
2
CTRRCRCRUS ffiANdOAIUS
20
5
6
5
17
12
10
14
I
2
12
6
5
11
9
6
6
9
2
7
t, LYSIDICE SP.B
1
1
9
29
8
5
4
25
3
4
5
5
8
6
5
14
7
8
2
4
UUCHDERANQUS (FACIALIS
11
6
11
7
5
2
15
16
6
3
10
9
13
22
22
10
2
0
0
2
PRICN36P10 OUSTA1A
5
1
3
4
5
3
5
5
9
2
6
7
19
15
21
11
7
12
0
23
SlWVUWfTj.TS rernBONEA
11
19
18
2
0
3
10
9
4
3
2
7
10
8
10
4
0
3
2
19
ASPID06IFHON M1HJFRT
2
0
1
11
19
4
14
19
5
4
2
15
7
8
11
1
4
3
12
12
CAECUM OrenAUM
22
14
15
2
21
5
33
44
25
19
7
2
0
0
7
7
5
1
18
0
CAECUM IMERICAIUM
154
88
523
7
52
50
503
259
135
210
26
20
28
17
36
79
58
15
0
12
CABQJM PUUCHEUJJM
788
315
0
1
10
10
1120
1461
120
219
13
9
7
5
6
138
21
6
0
8
5 GCNIADIDES OWXJNAE
0
0
1
27
2
16
8
33
2
1
19
2
3
9
1
9
48
3
9
0
MICRODEUnXUS MfEKSI
16
0
18
62
14
19
5
5
8
0
7
6
1
2
1
0
0
3
3
2
SBRHJLIDAE C5NJS C
3
4
0
44
288
58
1
375
0
1
185
199
291
56
853
1
1
0
I
9
EUDEVEN3PJS HDNDURANUS
10
48
27
1
0
1
31
2
0
5
0
1
7
0
0
6
0
0
L
6
-------
15
5
13
11-
12
9
6'
4 ¦
19'
18"
14"
2-
10'
1-
3-
17 ¦
8-
7'
20-
16-
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
Q-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE B; APRIL, 1987
E-79
-------
APSEUDES SP. H
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
GLYCERA SP. A
CAECUM IMBRICATUM
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
EXOGONE LOUREI
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
CAECUM SP. A
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
3-
AMPELISCA AGASSIZI
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
TYPOSYLLIS AMICA
CRENELLA DIVARICATA
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
PLEUROMERIS TRIDENTATA
ARMANDIA MACULATA
OWENIA SP. A
PARAMPHINOME SP. B
ASPIDOSIPHON MUELLERI
PIONOSYLLIS GESAE
SPHAEROSYLLIS PIRIFEROPSIS
3,
CAECUM PULCHELLUM
SPIOPHANES BOMBYX
GONIADIDES CAROLINAE
LYSIDICE SP. B
CYCLASPIS SP. N
SABELLIDES SP. A
ARICIDEA SP. H
METHARPINA FLORIDANA
PARAPRIONOSPIO PINNATA
CAECUM SP. C
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
ELASMOPUS SP. C
BHAWANIA HETEROSETA
KALLIAPSEUDES SP. B
POLYGORDIUS (LPIL)
!h
I
100
75 SO
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
25
R-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE B; APRIL, 1987
E-80
-------
Data matrix of station and species groups compiled from classification analysis dendrogram for Pensacola, FL survey, "B" site, April 1987.
A
B
c
D
STATION:
15
5
13
11
12
9
6
4
19
18
14
2
10
I
3
17
8
7
20
16
APSQJDES SP.H
22
69
17
10
31
56
45
49
39
26
72
101
45
70
59
25
17
20
15
0
ACOTDSS PAUCIBRANQOAIA
32
36
47
32
29
26
18
37
25
34
40
69
18
44
31
50
26
3
14
4
GLYCStA SP.A
19
13
11
20
25
20
21
24
27
29
30
29
28
31
23
22
19
18
13
Lb
CAECUM DQKICA1UM
77
112
47
31
21
12
11
29
28
67
158
48
123
27
30
201
224
11
6
70
PRIONOSPIO CRISTAIA
68
58
30
12
22
7
12
54
35
105
34
54
79
28
15
109
78
0
19
34
1
EXQQCNE LOUREI
30
25
28
31
14
3
18
63
8
17
33
55
18
15
29
56
86
1
2
22
FABRICIOLA TRILOBfflA
8
10
33
14
18
24
29
50
10
9
30
17
12
24
38
41
178
494
0
b
CAECUM SP.A
3
6
63
44
50
96
44
64
26
33
49
34
31
56
93
23
0
125
8
2
PROTODOWILLEA KEFEKSTtlNI
3
15
22
45
40
93
73
49
30
33
57
27
23
87
79
14
0
249
31
U
AMPELISCA AGASSIZI
IS
7
7
11
4
9
14
19
3
8
6
8
32
13
7
6
38
11
3
4
CRASSDffillA UUNUIAIA
8
13
25
12
14
13
18
20
14
24
28
24
11
7
14
39
43
15
20
2
TYPOSYLLIS AM1CA
14
16
11
14
7
6
19
17
24
24
12
12
10
7
15
31
43
19
11
2
CR0ELLA DIVAR1CAXA
7
13
21
9
10
12
18
13
12
15
14
8
12
8
16
27
68
21
2
12
CIRKOFiaOJS ERANCHIAIUS
29
24
10
11
12
14
13
25
11
35
6
11
14
4
3
28
24
14
6
H
2
PLEURttERIS TRIDEJfEAlA
7
2
14
19
6
15
6
10
3
3
21
21
19
16
16
41
56
30
I
1
AWWOIA MAQJLAIA
3
5
4
14
6
10
5
13
5
5
20
16
14
13
13
13
18
4
2
4
OHEMA SP.A
12
26
4
11
14
12
10
31
7
4
12
13
2
7
22
4
16
7
9
0
PARAWHDOE SP.B
4
13
11
8
6
41
26
21
14
34
12
27
10
22
34
9
2
58
46
0
ASPXD06IRCN MJELLERI
4
14
10
15
9
20
15
16
21
7
22
9
5
13
7
9
4
42
18
2
PICN3SYLLIS GESAE
6
12
5
10
10
10
6
18
12
18
5
8
3
0
9
15
2
25
0
1
SPHAEROSYULIS PIRIFEROPSIS
I
9
5
19
20
12
32
22
4
4
28
28
12
15
46
I
1
7
0
1
CAECUM RILCHEUJUM
123
405
58
9
13
14
2
5
5
12
229
106
236
14
21
397
408
26
I
155
SPlOPHAfES BQMBYX
246
76
101
136
57
100
89
102
100
123
227
211
173
115
143
210
232
81
19
206
3
ocNiAomes carounae
0
28
10
7
2
1
3
46
8
54
19
28
I
12
4
7
0
1
10
0
LYSID1CE SP.B
2
9
2
3
3
2
8
13
19
10
4
5
2
2
3
7
0
6
49
0
CYCLASP IS SP.N
6
0
6
6
5
7
1
7
2
1
22
4
2
5
3
4
3
0
I
SABELLTOS SP.A
2
5
4
2
2
1
10
9
0
0
4
5
6
1
5
5
20
0
0
I
ARIdDEA SP.H
2
6
13
2
6
8
10
3
I
6
I
3
1
2
1
6
5
22
1
2
4
(•EIHARPINA FIORUVWA
25
14
21
8
2
7
6
1
13
10
2
6
9
3
30
30
2
23
31
PARAPRIONDSPIO PDMAIA
13
8
11
7
12
2
15
6
6
13
2
3
9
1
1
34
47
2
0
49
CAECUM SP.C
8
8
5
4
I
2
0
2
1
2
5
2
9
0
0
48
53
1
0
b
ARICIDEA TAYU0R1
3
2
4
I
3
3
1
2
4
8
1
I
0
0
0
12
10
1
6
20
SERHJUDAE GENUS C
51
269
64
46
114
580
247
254
430
331
0
I
0
1
1
3
34
LI 7
b
ELASM3PUS SP.C
1
1
0
0
0
3
2
2
3
0
1
1
0
1
19
2
5
21
4
0
5
EHAHANIA ffiTEKOSEIA
1
1
4
1
0
0
10
10
7
21
0
1
0
2
2
1
I
2
79
0
KALLIAPSEUDES SP.B
0
0
2
2
0
2
0
I
0
I
0
I
' 0
0
0
1
2
20
0
0
POLYOORDIUS (LPIL)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
91
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
27
-------
20
18
13
19
14
3
12
15
4
17
10
8
1
11
6
5
7
16
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
Q-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE C5 NOVEMBER, 1986
E-82
-------
OSTRACODA FAMILY I
LEPTOCHELLA SP. D
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
EXOGONE LOUREI
MICRODEUTOPUS MYERSI
EUSARSIELLA ELOFSONI
ELASMOPUS SP. C
AMPELISCA AGASSIZI
TYPOSYLLIS AMICA
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
CAECUM IMBRICATUM
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
METHARPINA FLORIDANA
EDOTEA LYONSI
PLEUROMERIS TRIDENTATA
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
ASPIDOSIPHON MUELLERI
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
ARICIDEA CERRUTII
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
TRICHOBRANCHUS GLACIALIS
AXIOTHELLA SP. A
STREPTOSYLLIS PETTIBONEA
N
CYCLASPIS SP.
CAECUM CUBITATUM
APSEUDES SP. H
LYSIDICE SP. B
!F
2a
2b
2c
PARAPIONOSYLLIS LONGICIRRATA"
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
CAECUM SP. A
PARAMPHINOME SP. B
CAECUM PULCHELLUM
POLYGORDIUS (LPIL)
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
BRACHIOPODA (LPIL)
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
50
25
R-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE C; NOVEMBER, 1986
E-83
-------
Data macrlx of station and spec lea groups compiled from classification analysis dendrogram for Fensacola, PL survey, "C site, November 1986.
A
B
C
D
E
20
18
13
19
14
3
12
15
4
9
2
17
10
8
1
11
6
5
7
L6
OSHVOBA FAMILY I
200
132
147
330
173
140
323
283
315
14/.
2't\
132
280
112
233
59
232
167
7
0
LECTOOELIA SP.D
169
42
85
63
33
68
96
88
120
62
5H
142
41
110
66
73
120
119
219
281
1
FABRICIOLA TRXLOBAIA
22
169
71
147
231
35
60
50
6
24
84
184
170
166
286
69
10
3
4
10
KNEES PAUCIERANQOAXA
63
27
30
48
60
52
73
82
20
57
71
94
88
38
70
75
20
11
7
16
raoootc lojrei
3
61
16
23
40
22
27
19
9
16
52
42
45
19
79
40
6
5
5
9
MKarannros wersi
295
12
51
57
2
8
21
25
220
21
4
10
0
10
32
27
47
51
42
41
WSmsmiA ELOFSCNI
16
17
43
50
5
4
2
10
3
3
12
7
0
2
46
20
23
4
3
0
ELASCPUS SP.C
10
6
33
26
17
16
45
24
38
14
82
4
24
9
30
42
16
19
3
I
AMPQJSCA AGASSIZl
3b
18
45
78
16
26
20
31
34
40
32
38
44
57
UA
37
40
46
13
3
.a
Twosmis »acA
71
18
36
59
18
29
14
21
30
17
32
18
23
21
28
42
19
19
15
7
TELUNA VFKSiamt
56
41
55
61
8
7
22
19
24
23
16
12
6
7
15
20
47
51
8
2
CAECUM MRICMUM
77
137
102
172
39
6
11
16
28
26
12
14
15
17
21
0
17
18
7
2
HUDGVtXJtUS WMXAMUS
18
52
41
88
9
4
1
3
8
10
6
18
15
57
37
15
45
16
6
2
fOHARPINA FUORHWNA
16
8
29
10
5
10
9
20
18
6
10
9
10
22
5
11
12
15
2
2
EDOTEA UtOSI
lb
9
19
17
13
7
4
6
9
10
8
8
15
10
12
5
11
18
6
I
pianosus uueojkea
12
19
14
48
16
17
13
9
8
18
28
13
18
15
23
10
7
10
0
0
b
OlASSINELLA IUNULAXA
7
4
11
19
20
20
14
15
11
24
16
11
17
6
11
19
6
6
I
0
ASFID06IHEN HUUffll
7
7
5
13
23
11
25
23
25
36
14
23
37
U
22
9
6
20
2
0
coronaus branchiaius
4
6
5
17
12
13
19
18
10
4
12
6
7
13
8
16
15
7
12
11
ARICIDEA (BOOTH
4
27
9
14
15
15
4
8
4
6
10
22
6
36
24
IB
8
4
3
7
PROTODOBVIUEA KEFEKjTEINI
5
4
2
15
32
13
13
14
8
32
10
42
57
11
7
3
5
1
2
5
UtiaOBUMHJS GLACIALIS
39
12
19
52
15
10
8
14
5
1
7
8
4
19
32
46
1
1
5
5
c
AXKXIHEL1A SP.A
39
28
2
23
11
7
7
7
6
0
6
4
13
15
23
8
.2
0
3
0
SOEFFOSnUS PETTIBCNEA
20
10
3
22
22
3
13
14
12
6
11
28
17
44
37
20
2
2
3
0
ClfCLASPIS SP.N
8
15
0
26
9
13
2
7
14
10
24
30
5
1
10
0
11
5
0
0
1
CAECUM CUHHAUM
3
12
16
21
15
7
2
20
24
15
4
6
10
2
2
1
9
16
0
I
j
APSQJDES SP.H
4
0
1
0
15
20
13
24
17
33
50
12
49
9
33
11
8
16
0
8
LYSID1CE SP.B
12
I
7
5
0
16
35
18
17
9
18
7
13
4
16
8
1
1
1
7
PARAPICN06YLLIS LatlCBWXIA
«
6
2
7
14
3
17
7
6
0
4
30
15
5
16
11
0
2
5
5
ARICTDEA IMfUJU
7
10
I
16
4
4
4
10
4
1
3
5
3
7
9
8
0
2
16
55
4
PRIDN36PIO QUSTAIA
11
10
0
30
51
6
4
3
0
0
13
15
11
20
50
1
0
0
0
10
CAECUM SP.A
1
2
0
62
50
27
43
27
17
95
35
85
67
7
10
0
2
8
0
0
PMummne sp.b
0
0
1
16
24
14
8
9
17
23
5
23
18
2
2
3
0
0
0
4
CAECUM PULCHELUM
23
87
51
133
15
4
5
I
8
2
0
I
5
9
5
0
.11
a
14
3
c
POLYOORDIUS (U>IL)
31
58
35
0
I
1
2
1
2
0
3
3
3
35
4
12
0
0
37
30
J
SEBRJUDAE GH4US C
0
0
0
2
652
214
236
264
378
479
3
0
I
0
10
0
31
42
7
15
uwchiopooa (im)
2
2
22
0
4
2
3
1
4
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
9
250
4
1 .
41
-------
19-
17-
1-
14*
10*
2-
15-
11-
3*
12-
9-
5-
4-
8-
20-
13-
6-
18-
16"
100
75
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
Q-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE C; APRIL, 1987
E-85
-------
EURYPYLUS SP. B
PODARKEOPSIS LEVIFUSCINA
LYSIDICE SP. B
PARAMPHINOME SP. B
APSEUDES SP. H
CRASSINELLA LUNULATA
TYPOSYLLIS AMICA
GLYCERA SP. A
CRENELLA DIVARICATA
AMPELISCA AGASSIZI
CIRROPHORUS BRANCHIATUS
EXOGONE LOUREI
AONIDES PAUCIBRANCHIATA
ASPIDOSIPHON MUELLERI
EUDEVENOPUS HONDURANUS
METHARPINA FLORIDANA
PARAPRIONOSPIO PINNATA
CAECUM IMBRICATUM
PLEUROMERIS TRIDENTATA
ARICIDEA CERRUTII
OWENIA SP. A
NEPHTYS SIMONI
CAECUM SP. A
PROTODORVILLEA KEFERSTEINI
FABRICIOLA TRILOBATA
SPIOPHANES BOMBYX
PRIONOSPIO CRISTATA
Zh
T-1
J
CAECUM PULCHELLUM
TELLINA VERSICOLOR
ARICIDEA TAYLORI
POLYGORDIUS (LPIL)
LUMBRINERIDES DAYI
SERPULIDAE GENUS C
ARICIDEA SP. H
NEPHTYS PICTA
HETEROPODARKE LYONSI
ARICIDEA WASSI
THARYX CF. ANNULOSUS
LUMBRINERIS VERRILLI
DrJ
100
_l
75 SO
LEVEL OF SIMILARITY
25
R-MODE ANALYSIS, SITE C; APRIL, 1987
E-86
-------
Data matrix of station and species groups canpiled from classification analysis dendrograms for Pertsacola, FL survey, "C sice, April 1987.
A B C D E
STATION:
19
17
1
14
10
2
15
11
3
12
9
5
4
8
20
13
6
18
16
7
EUtOTYUJS SP.B
9
4
17
5
h
11
2
3
2
<4
10
1
1
2
3
2
3
0
0
0
P0DAKKB3PSIS LEVIFUSCINA
6
5
2
4
5
4
15
12
4
3
5
2
5
5
12
5
5
0
0
0
1 LYSIDICE SP.B
5
5
10
6
9
3
16
5
7
12
11
17
17
3
0
2
I
I
0
1
PAfWHTOIOt SP.B
16
0
3
33
47
9
19
14
7
7
27
0
10
3
3
0
1
1
0
0
APSEUDES SP.H
18
20
19
22
29
15
15
25
23
21
27
28
44
9
11
7
2
0
5
U
CRASS BELLA UJNULAIA
19
27
21
22
17
18
19
7
17
22
13
25
20
5
9
8
6
9
2
12
TYF06YLLIS AK1CA
18
26
30
9
19
17
18
18
15
24
27
21
22
12
11
15
10
9
8
13
GtfCEXA SP.A
10
14
16
21
15
11
14
21
29
12
20
13
9
10
11
6
7
6
8
12
(SBJQIA DIVAR1CAXA
20
26
20
37
30
14
24
18
31
42
9
20
12
4
17
11
12
18
10
29
ArtfllSCA AGASSIZI
11
23
11
6
4
7
17
16
16
12
9
15
13
11
18
16
7
9
6
7
cnnmPHaajs branchiahis
17
4
11
16
10
10
19
18
10
20
4
10
9
9
19
13
17
11
8
25
EXOQCNE UDUREI
7
15
47
34
35
27
14
16
20
IB
22
11
17
8
13
8
11
50
3
I
ACNUJES PftJCIHWNCHIAIA
20
22
15
22
28
23
40
33
23
18
38
10
20
20
15
9
7
4
4
0
2 ASPIDOSIPHON HJELLQU
24
27
43
18
28
16
16
13
18
36
22
41
24
5
22
20
11
1
2
1
EUEEVQCRJS HCNXJRANUS
47
22
18
6
23
15
10
5
6
7
23
13
7
22
22
30
33
4
2
0
teiHARPINA FURIDANA
14
9
2
7
11
6
5
10
10
10
4
13
3
17
22
30
26
29
9
4
PARAHUCMEPIO PINNAIA
4
14
1
13
8
7
6
10
16
9
3
9
8
23
19
13
17
32
103
9
CAECUM IMBRICAim
40
15
27
13
5
27
6
3
10
8
7
12
16
21
15
9
18
47
10
5
PIHJWMRIS TRIDENIAIA
37
15
22
11
17
9
4
7
10
6
11
2
3
9
11
7
6
17
0
1
ARICEDEA OEERljni
10
14
9
9
7
8
9
10
8
7
1
1
5
12
8
0
6
15
3
1
OWNIA SP.A
11
7
6
14
5
10
6
12
15
9
8
2
8
5
9
6
3
7
2
3
NEPHKS SDCNI
4
17
4
8
9
12
16
14
16
8
6
4
5
10
7
13
10
8
10
1
CABOJM SP.A
157
71
88
61
fc
53
M
35
23
29
39
4
12
I
41
3
5
2
0
I
PBOTCUCByiLLEA KEFEXSTEINI
131
36
50
86
85
31
21
28
17
13
39
2
15
2
14
2
8
1
1
0
3 FAHUCIOLA TRUOBAIA
529
120
323
176
158
31
23
19
21
72
38
26
10
42
20
38
9
227
6
1
SPIOPHANES BOMBYX
73
57
65
82
60
86
61
64
64
20
33
29
33
117
67
40
73
204
132
6
PRICN06PIO OUStAXA
20
43
44
57
56
63
51
54
75
9
45
12
25
48
91
6
41
34
53
0
CAECUM PUICHELOIM
17
3
23
6
U
6
5
5
1
3
0
0
6
30
3
1
2
90
6
4
4 TFU TNA VERSICOLOR
4
5
6
2
2
2
2
1
5
3
3
12
9
14
6
14
6
24
10
3
ARICIDRA TAJLCRI
4
6
6
3
4
3
8
9
6
1
3
10
11
10
0
4
2
9
25
7
POLYQORDHJS (LPIL)
38
1
1
6
7
0
7
1
0
1
9
I
0
25
9
5
15
80
15
0
IJUMHUNERIDES DASfl
0
7
5
10
7
9
9
16
7
9
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
SERHJLIDAE GENUS C
8
1
42
390
1
5
499
386
179
336
354
84
339
1
0
57
65
2
1
23
ARICIIXA SP.H
53
23
20
5
3
6
0
1
2
0
0
5
4
6
3
6
5
7
0
2
5 NEPKTYS PICIA
I
1
I
2
2
0
0
2
1
0
7
3
5
4
2
4
19
2
3
fEESGPaWWE LYONSI
2
2
0
1
1
3
8
2
2
7
0
7
6
6
7
0
16
6
0
0
ARICTDEA UASSI
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
20
4
17
3
11
23
4
4
0
THARYX CF. ATOULOSUS
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
4
4
9
16
8
I
IDMBRINERIS VERRnj.T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
I
4
2
21
-------
APPENDIX F
Demersal Fishes
and
Invertebrates
Site B
Site C
-------
I . I
STATUTE MILES
_ B-/ B-2
—2^
8-S _ B-4 i
SITE B
—JL6 B-T
, B-6
JHO _ b-9
C-l
C-2 C-3
c-r c-6
SITE C
C-8 C-9 c~10
FIGURE F-l
DEMERSAL FISH
SAMPLING SITES
C-4
C-5
-------
SAMPLING CHRONOLOGY
PENSACOLA, FLORIDA OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE
DEMERSAL FISH CHARACTERIZATION
MAY 19 - 20 , 1987
MAY 19. 1987
ARRIVE AT DISL 0800 HOURS
DEPART DISL 0900 "
EN ROUTE TO SITE C, TRANSECT 4, STATION C-8
ARRIVE AT STATION C-8...7980 - V - 13183.1
7980 - Y - 47055.0 1445 "
NET OVER 7980 - W - 13183.2
7980 - Y - 47055. 0 1446 "
NET FISHING 13186.1
47055.0 1451 »
*NOTE THAT CABLE LENGTH IS 5:1 OR ABOUT 500 FEET
TRAWL COMPLETE 13192.5
47055.0 1511 "
NET UP 13193.6
47055.0 1517 "
NET ON DECK 1319 3.6
47055.0 1518 "
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-9
ARRIVE AT STATION C-9...13200.0
47055.0 1525 n
NET OVER 13200.0
47055.0 1526 H
NET FISHING 13200.2
47055.0 1530 "
TRAWL COMPLETE 13207.1
47054.9 1550 "
NET UP 13207.9
47054.8 1555 "
NET ON DECK 13207.6
47055.0 1556 HOURS
F-2
*DISL - Dauphin Island Sealab
-------
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-10
ARRIVE AT STATION C-10..1321fi.0
47055.0 1603 "
NET OVER 13216.0
47055.0 1604 "
NET FISHING 13217.7 (DEPTH 75 FEET)
47055.0 1607 n
TRAWL COMPLETE 13224.0 (DEPTH 80 FEET)
47055.0 1627 "
NET UP 13224.7
47054.9 1630 "
NET ON DECK 13224.7
47054.9 1632 "
EN ROUTE TO TRANSECT 3, STATION C-5
ARRIVE AT STATION C-5...13226.0
47060.0 1650 "
NET OVER 13226.0
47060.0 1651 "
NET FISHING 13225.0 (DEPTH 70 FEET)
47060.0 1653 "
TRAWL COMPLETE 13217.5 (DEPTH 75 FEET)
47060.0 1713 "
NET UP 13216.6
47060.0 1715 "
NET ON DECK 13216.6
47060.0 1718 "
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-6
ARRIVE AT STATION C-6...13211.1
47060.0 1725 HOURS
NET OVER 13210.0
47060.0 1726 "
NET FISHING 13209.0 (DEPTH 68 FEET)
47060.0 1730 "
TRAWL COMPLETE 13202.4 (DEPTH 68 FEET)
47060.0 1750 "
F-3
-------
NET UP
NET ON DECK
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-7
NET OVER
NET FISHING
TRAWL COMPLETE
NET UP
NET ON DECK
NET OVER
NET FISHING...
TRAWL COMPLETE
NET UP
13201.7
47060.0 1753
13201.7
47060. 0 1755
1803
13194.3
47060.5 1804
13194.1 (DEPTH 65 FEET)
47060. 0 1808
13186.9 (DEPTH 58 FEET)
47060. 3 1828
13186.1
47060.3 1830
13186.1
47060. 3 1832
1852
13181.4
47065. 3 1853
13182.8 (DEPTH 54 FEET)
47065. 0 1856
13188.7 (DEPTH 57 FEET)
47065. 1 1916
13189.4
47065.1 1918
ARRIVE AT STATION C-7...13194.0
47060.0
EN ROUTE TO TRANSECT 2, STATION C-2
ARRIVE AT STATION C-2. ..13181.1
47065.0
NET ON DECK 13189.4
47065.1 1920
-------
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-3
ARRIVE AT STATION C-3...13202.0
47065.0 1931
NET OVER 13202.0
470G4.9 1932
NET FISHING 13203.8 (DEPTH 60 FEET)
47065.0 1935
TRAWL COMPLETE 13211.6 (DEPTH 65 FEET)
47065.0 1955
NET UP 13212.4
47065.0 1957
NET ON DECK 13212.4
47065.0 1959
EN ROUTE TO STATION C-4
ARRIVE AT STATION C-4...13216.0
47065.0 2005
NET OVER 13216.0
47065.0 2006
NET FISHING 13217.7 (DEPTH 67 FEET)
47065.0 2009
TRAWL COMPLETE 13224.1 (DEPTH 67 FEET)
47065.0 2029
NET UP 13225.0
47065.0 2031
NET ON DECK 13225.0
47065.0 2034 HOURS
EN ROUTE TO TRANSECT 1, STATION C-l
ARRIVE AT STATION C-l...13202.1
47067.6
NET OVER 13202.1
"
(DEPTH
53
FEET)
....2055 "
(DEPTH
55
FEET)
....2115 "
F-5
-------
NET UP 13192.6
47067.5 2118 "
NET ON DECK 13192.6
47067.5 2121 "
SITE C SAMPLING COMPLETED AT 2135 WHILE
EN ROUTE TO SITE B, TRANSECT 4, STATION B-10
ARRIVE AT STATION B-10..13222¦4
47074.0 2149 "
NET OVER 13224.4
47074.0 2150 "
NET FISHING 13224.5 (DEPTH 55 FEET)
47074.5 2153
TRAWL COMPLETE 13230.8 (DEPTH 62 FEET)
47074.0 2213 "
NET UP 13231.5
47074.2 2215 "
NET ON DECK 13231.5
47074.2 2217 »
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-9
ARRIVE AT STATION B-9...13240.0
47074.0 2230 H
NET OVER 13240.0
47074.0 2231 HOURS
NET FISHING 13240.2 (DEPTH 67 FEET)
47074.0 2233 "
TRAWL COMPLETE 13246.1 (DEPTH 73 FEET)
47074.0 2253 "
NET UP 13246.0
47074.0 2255 "
NET ON DECK 13246.0
47074.0 2257 ¦
F-6
-------
EM ROUTE TO TRANSECT 3, STATION B-8
ARRIVE AT STATION B-8...13258.7
47078.0 2313
NET OVER 13258.7
47078.0 2314
NET FISHING 13257.0 (DEPTH 70 FEET)
47078.0 2318
TRAWL COMPLETE 13250.6 (DEPTH 70 FEET)
47078.0 2338
NET UP 13249.9
47078.0 2340
NET ON DECK 13249.9
47078.0 2343
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-7
ARRIVE AT STATION B-7...13245.1
47078.0 2353
NET OVER 13245.1
47078.0 2355
NET FISHING 13242.1 (DEPTH 70 FEET)
47078.0 2358
MAY 20, 1987
TRAWL COMPLETE 13235.4 (DEPTH 60 FEET)
47077.9 0018 HOURS
NET UP 13234.5
47077.7 0020 "
NET ON DECK 13234.5
47077.7 0023 "
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-6
ARRIVE AT STATION B-6...13230.5
47078.1 0030 "
NET OVER 13230.1
47078.1 0031 "
NET FISHING 13228.0 (DEPTH 58 FEET)
47078.0 0035 "
F-7
-------
TRAWL COMPLETE
NET UP
NET ON DECK...
NET OVER
NET FISHING
TRAWL COMPLETE
NET UP
NET ON DECK
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-4
NET OVER
NET FISHING
TRAWL COMPLETE
NET UP
NET ON DECK
13221.6 (DEPTH 58 FEET)
47078. 5 0055
13220.6
47078.3 0057
13220.6
47078. 3 0100
0108
13226.0
47082.2 0110
13226.2 (DEPTH 60 FEET)
47082. 2 0115
13232.4 (DEPTH 58 FEET)
47081.9 0135
13232.7
47082.0 0139
13232.7
47082.0 0142
0154
13241.0
47082. 3 0155
13242.4 (DEPTH 58 FEET)
47082.2 0158
13248.7 (DEPTH 65 FEET)
47082.2 0215
13249.2
47082.2 0220
13249.2
47082.2 0223
EN ROUTE TO TRANSECT 2, STATION B-5
ARRIVE AT STATION B-5...13226.0
47082.0
ARRIVE AT STATION B-4... 13241.0
47082.3
F-8
-------
EN ROUTE TO TRANSECT 1, STATION
B-3
ARRIVE AT STATION B-3...13261.1
47085.3.
0237
n
NET OVER 13260.9
47085.0.
0239
n
NET FISHING 13258.6
47084.3.
(DEPTH
65
FEET)
,...0243
H
TRAWL COMPLETE 13252.0
47085.0.
(DEPTH
63
FEET)
,.. .0303
n
NET UP 13251.9
47085.0.
,.. .0307
n
NET ON DECK 13251.9
47085.0.
0310
n
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-2
ARRIVE AT STATION B-2...13244.0
47085.0.
0325
R
NET OVER 13244.4
47085.0.
0326
HOURS
NET FISHING 13242.0
47085.0,
(DEPTH
50
FEET)
0330
n
TRAWL COMPLETE 13235.4
47085.0.
(DEPTH
50
FEET)
0350
n
NET UP 13033.9
47085.0,
0358
n
NET ON DECK 13033.9
47085.0,
....0400
n
EN ROUTE TO STATION B-l
ARRIVE AT STATION B-l...13230.0
47085.0,
....0403
n
NET OVER 13230.0
47085.0
0404
n
NET FISHING 13228.0
47085.0
(DEPTH
60
FEET)
0407
n
TRAWL COMPLETE 13022.0
47085.2
(DEPTH
60
FEET)
0427
it
F-9
-------
NET UP
13219.3
47085.0
0429 "
NET ON DECK 13219.3
47085.0 0432 "
SITE B SAMPLING COMPLETED AT 0450 HOURS WHILE
EN ROUTE TO DAUPHIN ISLAND SEALAB.
ARRIVE DISL AT 1010 HOURS, TRIP COMPLETE.
F-10
-------
PEHSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES - FISH SPECIES LIST
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
SPECIES
B-J,
M
fi-3
M
fi-5
M
JH
H
B"?
HQ
Ra1a eqtanteri?
2
1
Gvmnothorax niaronaralnatus
1
1
3
1
Ariosoma balaericum
8
1
2
4
3
2
9
6
5
3
Hildebrandia flava
1
Paraconaer caudilimbatus
1
1
2
2
1
1
Oohichthus ocellatus
1
1
1
Etrumeus teres
1
1
1
Svnodus foetens
1
1
2
1
1
1
Svnodus so. (larvae)
1
Trachinoceohalus mvoos
1
4
2
2
1
3
6
3
3
7
Halieutichthvs aculeatus
1
1
1
1
Qqcpcephatos puMffpp?
1
1
Uroohvcis reaia
2
2
3
2
3
1
3
1
toMPhidi™ qtttltall.
10
38
32
171
141
93
64
35
117
Oohidion oravi
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
3
QnhMton MbtppKi
9
10
28
22
14
10
17
20
5
7
OtoDhidium omostiomum
1
30
23
8
3
14
25
5
5
Centrooristis ocvurus
6
1
37
1
4
4
1
4
6
4
Centrooristis ohiladelohica
5
Diolectrum formosum
11
5
3
6
15
20
7
7
8
20
Serraniculus oumilio
2
Trachurus lathami
1
4
3
1
3
1
5
Haemulon aurolineatum
5
17
2
4
2
62
1
F-ll
-------
PENSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES - FISH SPECIES LIST (Continued)
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
SPECIES B-l B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 B-10
OrthoDristis chrvsootera 2
16
4
3
1
4
3
9
Paarus Daarus 3
3
5
2
2
2
2
1
Stenotomus caDrinus 3.111 4.103
460
61
135
588
33
32
15
Sciaenid sp.
1
HemiDteronotus novacula
1
SDhvraena borealis
1
Microaobius carri
1
PepjUus bmtt
1
1
9
2
12
8
Prionotus martis 8
10
16
6
31
9
4
36
14
4
Prionotus salionicolor
1
1
2
1
Prionotus scitulus 2
5
1
7
2
1
Prionotus tribulus
1
1
1
1
1
Scoroaena brasiliensis
1
AncvloDsetta ouadrocellata
1
Bothus robinsi
3
3
Citharichthvs macrons 3
1
1
3
5
2
3
6
4
EtroDUs rimosus 2
1
20
2
2
4
1
1
Svacium Dapillosum 13
4
6
4
9
6
5
22
18
3
Gvmnachirus melas
1
1
SvniDhurus minor 1
2
6
5
6
4
6
13
2
Svmohurus urosDilus
1
Aluterus schoeDfi 1
1
7
1
2
2
1
Aluterus scriDtus
1
1
Monacanthus hisDidus
1
LactoDhrvs auadricornis
1
1
F-12
-------
PBHSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES - FISH SPECIES LIST
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. ST A. STA. STA. STA.
SPECIES
Q-X
c-i
C-3
-------
PENSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES - FISH SPECIES LIST (Continued)
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
SPECIES C-l C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10
Prionotus scitulus 2
Prionotus tribulus 2 11
Ancvlopsetta auadrocellata 2 1 1
Citharichthvs macrons 5 14 6 2 5 1
Etropus rimosus 1 11
Svacium papillosum 712117 6 211
Honacanthus hispidus 1 11
Sohoeroides dorsalis 1 1
F-14
-------
PEHSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES
INVERTEBRATE SPECIES LIST - SITE B
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
immmm yaxa ti bj sj ts b-6 b-7 b-s b-9 b-io
CRUSTACEA
Slcvonla brevirostris 5 8 59 67 31 20 67 135 96 8
Solenocera atlantidis 8 58 181 117 90 53 79 146 59
Hegopenasw faopicaHs l l
Penaeus duorarum 1
Penaeus aztecus 1 l
Pontonia domestica 1
Scvllaras chacei 1
Porceliana savana 1
Alftunea qjifrtftgii l
Dromidia antiliensis 115 2 2 1
CfltaPPfl 1
Pondochela sp. 1
Parthsnm sp. 1
kfrOPUmiMS aqassizil 1
Portunus spinimanus 1 2 4 5 3
Portunus spinicarpus 3 14 3 3 8 8 12 4
ECHINODERMS
Luidia clathrata 12 1 1 2 3
Astropecten duplicates 111 l
Echlnaster sp. 1 1
Encope michelini 11 5 1
F-15
-------
PENSACOLA OFFSHORE DISPOSAL SITES
INVERTEBRATE SPECIES LIST - SITE B
(Continued)
STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA. STA.
IHVERTEBRATE TAXA B-l B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-8 B-9 fclfl.
MOLLUSCS
Loliqo pealeii 42 105 495 322 104 211 95 36 155 228
QctPPUS vulgaris 1 1
Pleuiobranchaea hedgpethi 5 2 1 1 3 10
Araopecten qibbus 2 9 11 32586
Bnsvcon spiratam 111 1
Efictsa javeneli 3 13 5
CMIDARIAH
Viraularia presbvtes 1 2
ASCIDIAN (LPIL)* 13 3 1
*LPIL - Lowest Practicable Identification Level
F-16
-------
PENSACOLA OFFSHORB DISPOSAL SITES
INVERTEBRATE SPECIES LIST - SITE C
INVERTEBRATE TAXA
STA.
_Ci_
STA.
STA.
_£J_
STA.
j£li_
STA.
JL5_
STA.
_£±_
STA.
SzL.
STA.
C-8
STA.
_£J_
STA.
JcM
CRUSTACEA
Sicvonia brevirostris 25
fateMCSSa jitl,ant;idi? 20
Trachvoenaens constiictns 1
heptocMa DdDulata
OxallBea.
ECHINODBRMS
Laiiii Clathrata
Astrooecten duplicates
Bchlnastgi: sp.
BnCfififc nichelini
Clvpeaster prostratns
MOLLUSCS
Loliqo Pealell 553
Qeiacus. vulgaris 1
Pleuiobranchaea hedgpethi 5
Bwgycon sptratp 1
frwrecten qibbus
ESEifiH raveneli
Laevicardium laeviqatum
Stsnflfilax sp.
ASCIDIAM (LPIL) *
10
12
1 243 934
1
1
5
1
40
52
13
5 92
17
"LPIL - Lowest Practicable Identification Level
F-17
-------
APPENDIX G
PROPOSED MONITORING PLAN
-------
APPENDIX G
PROPOSED MONITORING PLAN
1. Introduction. The EPA conducted surveys of the proposed ODMDS in 1987
(See Appendices A,C,D,E,and F). The data collected during these surveys will
serve as the baseline for the proposed monitoring plan. The ODMDS will be
monitored once during the first year following its initial use. Side scan
sonar, photography, and chemical analysis will be initiated early in the
year. However, benthic and fish sampling will be delayed until later in the
year to avoid bias from the short term impacts of dredged material disposal.
Future monitoring requirements will be determined based on the results of
the first year's monitoring. The proposed monitoring plan is discussed in
the following paragraphs.
2. Side Scan Sonar. A bathymetric survey using side scan sonar will be
conducted to characterize the bottom. Transects will be located at
approximately 800-foot intervals to provide approximately 40 percent overlap
between transects. Transect spacing will be adjusted as necessary to provide
adequate overlap, depending upon the transponder used. Navigation
coordinates will be recorded on the side scan printout at approximately 800-
foot intervals along with an interpretation of the side scan data. Any
unusual bottom characteristics will be marked on the chart for subsequent
investigations by divers or ROV, if considered necessary.
3. Photographic Records. A towed camera sled will be used to obtain a
continuous video record along transects spaced at 800- foot intervals.
Navigation coordinates and depth will be recorded at approximately 800-foot
intervals along each transect. Video coverage will be adjusted as necessary
to insure coverage of the area affected by dredged material disposal. Still
photographs of bottom characteristics will be taken at random by divers at
each benthic sampling station.
4. Bottom Sampling. Bottom sampling will include sampling for benthic
macroinvertebrates / sediment chemistry and sediment particle size. These
areas are discussed in the following paragraphs and sample stations are
shown on Figure G-l.
4.1 Benthic Macroinvertebrates. A total of 11 stations will be sampled for
benthic macroinvertebrates with 15 replicates taken at each station. Samples
will be collected by divers using round stainless steel hand corers 10 cm in
diameter and 15 cm long. The top end of each corer will be screened with
0.5 mm mesh. Each corer will be pushed into the sediment to its full length
(15 cm), capped on the bottom end by the diver's hand, momentarily inverted
and placed in a cloth bag which will be tightly secured to prevent the loss
of sediment and organisms. All samples will be sieved through 0.5 mm
screens aboard ship, placed in appropriate containers, and immersed in 10%
formalin/seawater solution with rose bengal stain for transport to the
laboratory.
G-l
-------
4.2 Sediment Chemistry. Sediment will be collected from 11 stations for
sediment chemical analysis using Teflon coring tubes along with the benthic
macroinvertebrate sampling. Core penetration will be 15 cm depth. All
cores will be refrigerated and iced for return to the laboratory for
analysis. Analyses will include a metals scan, pesticides, chlorinated
hydrocarbons, oil and grease, and nutrients (NH^, NC^+NCL-N, TKN). Sampling
for sediment chemistry will be adjusted as necessary depending on the
results of the initial survey.
4.3 Sediment Particle Size. Samples will be collected for sediment '
particle size analyses simultaneously with and in the same manner as
sediment chemistry sampling. All cores will be carefully decanted and frozen
aboard ship prior to shipment to the laboratory. The samples will be
processed according to the wet sieve Modified Wentworth method.
5. Water Quality Sampling. Water quality sampling will be collected at
six stations. Water qualitysampling will consist of dissolved oxygen,
salinity and temperature profiles at 5-foot increments from surface to
bottom. Light extinction profiles will be conducted at 10-foot increments
from surface to bottom. After determination of the 90, 50, and 10% light
levels, water samples will be collected, composited, and a sample extracted
and filtered for chlorophyll-a analysis. Water samples will be collected at
surface, mid-depth, and bottom at each sampling station for nutrient
analysis.
6. Demersal Fishes. Demersal fishes will be collected from 10 stations
{See Figure F-l) using a 40-foot otter trawl equipped with a 0.25 inch mesh
liner. Trawl times will be standardized at 20 minutes. Trawl catches from
each station will be placed in appropriate containers and fixed with 10%
formalin. Fish specimens larger than 4 inches standard length will be slit
to allow proper fixation.
G-2
-------
? ?
1 1 1
STATUTE MILES
SITE C
• SEDIMENT SIZE, CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, STILL PHOTOGRAPHS
O SEDIMENT ORGANICS
o WATER QUALITY
FIGURE G-l
SITE C
SAMPLING STATION
G-3
------- |