-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22630
who stated that the alternate standard
for inorganic hazardous waste disposed
of in lab packs should be expanded,
asnd that the treatment train proposed
by the commenters may effectively treat
certain organometallic wastes. The
Agency believes that a more effective
approach to managing inorganic and
organometallic wastes would allow
commingling of these wastes in an -
"organometallic" or "appendix IV lab
pack." The alternate treatment standard
of incineration followed by treatment to
achieve the treatment standards for the
EP toxic metals included in appendix IV
will effectively destroy the organ!cs and
immobilise the metal constituents. The
Agency, therefore, is not promulgating
the alternate treatment standard for
"Inorganic lab packs" as proposed, but
rather is promulgating an alternate
standard for "organometallic" or
"appendix IV lab packs."
The Agency is departing from its
proposed approach for inorganic
hazardous waste based on concern with
specifying stabilization as a treatment
standard for metallic waste streams
with varying treatability with no
requirement for verifying that
stabilization of the hazardous
constituents was effective. The Agency
is also concerned that die proposed
standard would create risks to worker
health and safety due to the need for
removal of inorganic waste from inner
containers prior to stabilization with
Portland cement Several commenters
claimed that such practices result in
unnecessary exposure of treatment
personnel, and increase the risk of
atctdents and resulting environmental *
exposure. The Agency was unaware of
these safety and environmental
concerns, and does not wish to increase
the risks associated with treatment of
these wastes.
Several commenters suggested that
the Agency allow corrosive (D002) and
reactive (D003) wastes in organic lab
packs, while others requested that they
be allowed in inorganic or-
organometallic lab packs. The
commenters stated that industry
experience with these wastes indicates
that they can be effectively treated by
incineration, and that recovery is not a
cost-effective or practical method of
treating these wastes. The Agency
agrees in part with the commenters.
Although Agency data show that some
corrosive wastes can be incinerated
effectively (54 FR 48422), many of these
wastes contain metal constituents that
may require further treatment The
Agency is concerned that incineration of
metal-bearing wastes without
verification may not be protective of
human health and the environment.
(Where the Agency specifies a
technology as the treatment standard,
treatment using the specified technology
satisfies the land disposal restriction
requirements, and analysis cf the
treatment residues i3 not required for
purposes of complying with part 258.)
The Agency, therefore, is prohibiting
D002 corrosive and D003 reactive
wastes from appendix V lab packs.
Rather, the Agency believes that the
alternate treatment standard for
Appendix IV organometallic lab packs,
which requires incinceration and
treatment to meet certain EP toxic metal
treatment standards, is more
appropriate for D002 and D003 wastes
because it requires incineration of
organic constituents that may interfere
with stabilization and verification that
treatment of metals has occurred. The
Agency, therefore, is including these
waste codes in appendix IV to part 263.
Generators may dispose of D002 and
D003 wastes in an appendix IV
(organometallic) lab pack along with
other wastes identified in appendix IV,
provided that the compatibility
standards in $ J 284.316 and 265.310 are
met
The Agency wishes to clarify that
where an appendix IV lab pack contains
listed hazardous waste with waste code-
specific treatment standards for
inorganic constituents that are also EP
toxic metals (5 261.24) (within the same
lab pack), the waste must be treated, at
a minimum, to meet the EP toxic metal
treatment standard. For example, an
appendix IV lab pack may contain
analytical samples of PD08 waste
(wastewater treatment sludges from
electroplating operations) which has
waste code-specific treatment standards
for cadmium, chromium, lead and silver.
These constituents are also EP toxic
metals. In comparing the F008 treatment
standards with the EP toxic metal
treatment standards for these
constituents, the F0C8 treatment
standards for cadmium, lead, and silver
are lower than their respective EP toxic
metal treatment standards, while the
F006 treatment standard for chromium is
higher. The applicable alternate
treatment standards for all of the metal
' constituents in this hypothetical analytic
sample, at a minimum, would be the
treatment standards for the EP toxic
metals.
The Agency further wishes to clarify
that where lab packs are combined with
other non-lab pack hazardous wastes
prior to or during treatment (e.g., prior to
- incineration), f S 268.41 and 268.43(b)
require that the entire mixture must be
treated to meet the most stringent
treatment standards applicable to th
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22631
where incineration only is specified as
the treatment standard.
Some commenters stated that there is
no sound basis for excluding waste
codes that already meet th&treatment
standards from disposal in their
respective lab packs. The Agency is not
opposed to extending the alternate
standards to such waste, but was
unaware that generators disposed of
treated waste (or waste that initially
meets the treatment standard) in this
manner. Numerous commenters have
expressed a desire to continue this
practice; therefore, the Agency is
revising the language in 40 CFR
268.42(c)(1) so that prohibited waste that
meets the applicable treatment
standards is not precluded from disposal
utilizing the alternate treatment
standards, provided that each waste
code(s) is listed in appendix IV or
appendix V. and the waste is disposed
of in the appropriate lab pack.
Several commenters stated that
incineration (or deactivation by
incineration) of small quantities of
reactive U and P wastes in lab packs is
proven to be safe and effective. The
commenters further point to the fact that
EPA proposed deactivation,
incineration, or thermal treatment for
several U and P waste codes that are
potentially reactive wastes, but failed to
include the applicable waste codes in
appendix IV. The Agency agrees with
the commenters that small quantities of
reactive U and P waste codes as
specified in the proposed rule (54 FR
43427-48428) can be safety packaged
and incinerated in a lab pack provided
•that the requirements for incompatible
waste in §§284.316 and 285J16 are met
The Agency is therefore amending
appendices IV and V to include several
additional U and P wastes codes. The
Agency also is including California list
PCBs and dioxin-containing waste
(t020-F023. F028-F028) in the lab pack
treatability group as proposed, but
reiterates that treatment of these wastes
requires more stringent performance
standards than wastes included in part
258 appendices IV and V (Le.. dioxins
must achieve a destruction and removal
. efficiency of 99.9999 percent and PCBs
must meet the technical standard in 40
CFR 781.70). Where generators choose to
commingle one or both of these wastes
with organic lab pack wastes listed in
appendices IV and V. the entire lab pack
must be incinerated to meet the more
stringent standard. The following
examples are provided for clarification:
(a) A lab pack containing dioxin-
containing waste. California list PCBs
and appendix V waste must be
incinerated according to the technical
standards of 40 CFR 781.70 and the
applicable requirements of parts 284.
285, and 268 (including all applicable
performance standards for dioxin-
containing waste).
(b) A lab pack that contains only
dioxin-containing waste (F020-23 and
F028-28) or a mixture of dioxin-
containing waste and organic hazardous
waste codes listed in appendix V to part
2S8 must be incinerated according to the
provisions in part 284 or 265 subpart O
(including the applicable performance
standards for dioxin-containing waste).
According to the provisions of today'B
final rule, generators may utilize the
alternate treatment standards if their lab
packs contain those wastes summarized
below:
(a)	"Appendix IV organometallic lab
packs" may contain the following
hazardous waste identified in appendix
IV:
(1)	Organometallic;
(2)	Inorganic;
(3)	Organic
(4)	0002 corrosives; and
(5)	D003 reactives.
(b)	"Appendix V organic lab packs"
may contain only those organic
hazardous wastes identified in appendix
V.
Lab packs which contain any hazardous
waste other than wastes listed in
Appendix V are not appendix V organic
lab packs, and may not use the alternate
treatment standard.
d. Other Requirements
EPA proposed that generators or
owners/operators who dispose of lab
packs according to the alternate
treatment standard must also meet the
requirements for lab packs specified in
40 CFR 264.316 and 265.316. Several
commenters expressed concern with the
provision that requires metal outer
containers (9 261310(b)) and
§ 265.316(b)), and pointed out that the
original intent of these regulations yas
to ensure adequate containment for lab
pack wastes that were being land
disposed with or without prior
treatment The commenters further
stated that lab packs destined for
incineration are generally put in fiber
packs that meet die Department of
Transportation (DOT) requirements (49
CFR 173.12) and are suitable for
incineration. The commenters requested
that the Agency allow the continued use
of fiber packs that meet applicable DOT
requirements. The Agency does not wish
to disrupt the use of fiber packs, and is
amending 3 § 3)4-316(b) and 286.316(b) to
allow their continued use.
The Agency is promulgating its
proposed approach with regard to
generator notification requirements, and
is requiring generators to list each EPA
Hazardous Waste Code on a notification
form and identify the applicable lab
pack categories. Several commenters
stated that the notification provision as
proposed is burdensome. The Agency
believes, however, that notification is
necessary in order for owners/operators
to verify that they are accepting for
treatment only those waste codes
covered under their permit. The Agency
reiterates that the provisions
promulgated in today's final rule do not
supersede permit requirements under
the RCRA hazardous waste program.
Generators or owners/operators who
intend to utilize the applicable alternate
treatment standard for hazardous waste
codes listed in appendix IV and
appendix V to part 268 must comply
with the notification, certification, and
recordkeeping requirements of 40 CFR
26&7(a) (7) and (8). They must also
comply with the provisions in sections
(a)(1), (a)(5). (a)(8). (b)(2) and (c). The
Agency is requiring generators utilizing
the alternate treatment standards to
state whether the lab pack is am
appendix IV or appendix V lab pack,
and certify that hazardous wastes
included therein are listed in fh®
applicable appendix. The Agency
emphasizes that lab packs containing
hazardous wastes other than those
listed in appendix IV and appendix V to
part 288 are excluded from the alternate
treatment standards for lab packs.
m.B Capacity Determinations
1. Determination of Alternative
Capacity and Effective Dates for
Surface-Disposed Wastes. Between May
8,1990, when this rule was signed, and
the date of its publication in the Federal
Register, EPA discovered and corrected
several discrepancies between the
capacity variances discussed in the
preamble and those included in the
regulatory language. For details on those
corrections, please contact those listed
in the additional information section at
the beginning of the preamble.
a. Total Quantity of Land-Disposed
Wastes. The capacity analyses for
wastes for which EPA is today finalizing
treatment standards were conducted •
using the National Survey of Hazardous
Waste Treatment Storage. Disposal,
and Recycling Facilities (the TSDR
Survey). EPA conducted the TSDR
Survey during 1987 and early 1988 to
obtain comprehensive data on the
nation's capacity for managing
hazardous waste and on the volumes of
hazardous waste being disposed of in or
on the land in 1968 (i.e.. land disposal).
-------
22632
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Survey data are part of the record for
this final rule.
Other major sources of data include
the National Survey of Hazardous
Waste Generators, conducted by EPA
during 1988 and 1939. This survey
includes data on waste generation,
waste characterization, and hezardous
waste treatment capacity in units
exempt from RCRA permitting. These
data are also part of the record for this
final rule.
For mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes,
EPA used data supplied by the U.S.
Department of Energy. Low-level
radioactive waste survey data from
individual states and State compacts
were also used, as were data summaries
in several overview reports on mixed
ladioactive waste.
The various land disposal methods
used in 1988 and the quantities of waste
they handled (excluding mixed
radioactive wastes) are presented in
Table III.B.l.(a). The data indicate about
5.7 billion gallons of the wastes for
which standards are being finalized
today were disposed of in or on the
land. This estimate includes 77 million
gallons that were stored in waste piles
for short-term storage purposes. These
stored wastes will eventually be treated,
recycled, or permanently disposed of in
other units. To avoid double counting,
the volumes of wastes reported as being
Btored in waste piles have not been
included in the volumes of wastes
requiring alternative treatment
EPA estimates that about 22 million
gallons of treatment residuals from
.minimum technology impoundments or
from impoundments that were replaced
by a tank (e.g., standard cement, steel
tanks] will require alternative treatment
EPA assumes that these wastes are now
being sent off-site for treatment
Consequently, this amount is included
as treatment capacity required in
today's rule.
Table lll.B.l .(a)—'Volume of Wastes by
Land Disposal Method For Which
Standards Are Bo«g Finalized
trmuiona of gallons/year)
Land disposal method
Storage:
Waste piles.
Surface impoundments.
Treatment
Waste pitas.
Surface impoundments.
Disposal:
Landftte		
Land treatments
Surface impoundments.
Underground injected	
Volume
Table lll.B.l.(a)—'Volume of Wastes by
land Disposal Method For Which
Standards are Beinq Finalized—
Continued
[millions of gallons/year]
Landdsp
osal method
Volume
Total. 		
5,701

77
2
30
22
949
81
62
5.068
In addition, 30 million gallons of
wastes were treated in waste piles, 52
million gallons were disposed of in
surface impoundments, 430 million
gallons were disposed of in land
treatment units or landfills, and 5.1
billion gallons were injected
underground. All of these wastes will
require alternative treatment capacity.
EPA notes, however, that the TSDR
Survey may overstate demand for
treatment capcity for wastewaters that
were treated or disposed of in surface
impoundments at the time of the survey
(1987 and early 1988). This
overstatement is due to the requirement
that impoundments receiving most
hazardous wastes must now be
retrofitted to meet minimum technology
requirements, or taken out of service, as
a result of RCRA section 3005(j). If an
impoundment continues to operate after
being retrofitted, it becomes a section
3005(j}(ll) impoundment provided that
the wastewaters are treated and
residues are removed annually.
Wastewaters that are not treated or
disposed of in surface disposal units, or
that are treated in section 3005(j)(ll)
impoundments, do not create any
demand for alternative commercial
treatment capacity.
EPA solicited comments on those ,
wastewaters currently disposed of in
surface units that require alternative
commercial treatment capacity. One
commenter mentioned that EPA did not
include volumes associated with surface
impoundments awaiting closure. No
commenter provided information on the
volumes associated with these
impoundments. Based on EPA's data,
approximately ten percent of the surface
impoundments that have submitted
closure plans are awaiting closure plan
approvals. EPA believes that most of
these impoundments removed liquid
hazardous wastes on or about
November 8.1988. EPA believes that the
remaining volume of wastewaters in
surface disposal units awaiting closure
is small Consequently, EPA did not
include in the capacity analysis
additional volumes associated with
surface impoundments awaiting closure.
(This discussion does not apply to
wastewaters destined for deepwell
disposal.)
EPA also requested comments on the
quantity of RCRA P and U waste codes
currently being disposed of in
deepweils. The TSDR Survey data
include some large-volume waste
streams containing P and U RCRA
codes. However, P and U wastes by
definition are discarded off-specification
products or residues and are usually
generated in small volumes. Facilities
disposing of these large-volume waste
streams in deepweils have indicated
that small volumes of P and U wastes
were mixed with large volumes of other
wastes, but the facilities were not able
to provide a specific volume for the
deepwell-disposed P and U wastes.
Since the facilities generally described
the volume of P and U wastes deepwell-
disposed as "very small," EPA has
assumed for the analysis of alternative
treatment capacity that the national
volume of P and U wastes needing
alternative capacity is less than 100,000
gallons. EPA also requested comments
on the assumption that the volumes of P
and U wastes being deepwell-disposed
are less than 100.000 gallons. -• *
EPA received several comment^
concerning deepwell-injected P and U
wastes. One commenter submitted data
indicating that their facility disposed of
20,458 gallons of U wastes by deepwell
injection in 1989. However, this
commenter has received a no-migration
petition approval and no alternative
capacity is needed. One commenter
indicated that EPA's methodology for
determining actual P and U volumes
was flawed resulting in artificially low
estimates, and believed that the true
volume of these wastes was large
enough to warrant a national capacity
variance (3.3 million gallons at the
commenter's facility alone). EPA has
reviewed these data and agrees that the
P and U volume at the second
commenter's facility is much larger than
previously assigned under the P and U
methodology of 100,000 gallons.
However, this volume has been
determined to belong to a stream that is
not a hazardous waste under Section
281.3(a)(2)(iv). The large volume of the
stream does not reflect the volume of P
and U wastes in the stream—which
resulted from de minimis losses—but
rather the total wastewater volume. This
volume, therefore, does not require
alternative treatment capacity.
Consequently, EPA is not changing its P
and U waste methodology and is not
granting a national capacity variance to
these wastes.
The following sections provide a
summary of the capacity analysis for the
-------
Federal Register / Vol.
56, No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22633
final rule. The detailed analyses are
presented in the background document
and all data are included in the public
docket.
b. Required Alternative Capacity for
Surface-Disposed Wastes. l3>A assessed
the requirements resulting from today's
final rule for alternative treatment
capacity for surface-disposed wastes.
Using primarily the TSDR and Generator
Survey data. EPA first characterized the
volumes of wastes for which treatment
standards are being established. Waste
streams were characterized on the basis
of land disposal method, waste code,
physical and chemical form, and waste
characterization data. Using this
information. EPA placed the wastes in
treatability groups associated with
applicable treatment technologies. The
waste volumes were then summed by
treatability group to determine the
amount and type of alternative
treatment capacity that would be
required when owners or operators
comply with the land disposal
restrictions being finalized today.
Based on this analysis, EPA estimates
that today's rule could affect about 5.7
billion gallons of wastes that are land-
disposed annually. This total includes 77
million gallons in short-term storage^
and 70 million gallons that already meet
treatment standards or that can be
treated on-site. Consequently, only
about 5.5 billion gallons will require
treatment to meet standards EPA is
promulgating in today's rule. Of this
total 513 million gallons were surface-
disposed (le„ excluding underground
injection), and the remaining 5 billion
gallons were underground injected. (See
Section 2 ^determinations of
alternative capacity and effective dates
for wastes injected underground.) EPA
estimates that treatment of these
surface-disposed and deepwell-injected
wastes will generate approximately 82
million gallons of residuals requiring
treatment before land disposal.
The volumes of surface-disposed
wastes by waste codes that require
commercial treatment and/or recycling
capacity to meet the standards that EPA
is promulgating today are presented in
Table DLB.l.(b). This table does not
include waste volumes that can be
treated on-site by the generator, nor
does it contain volumes of mixed
radioactive wastes.
As explained in section OLA of this
preamble. EPA is finalising treatment
standards expressed either as
concentration limits based on the
performance of the BOAT, or as a
specific treatment technology. When a
treatment standard la expressed as a
concentration limit, a specific treatment
method is not required to achieve that
concentration leveL However, the BDAT
(and comparable technologies), as
discussed in Section IILA* were used as
the basis for determining available
capacity. When the treatment standard
is expressed as a specific technology
(rather than a concentration limit), that
technology must be used.
Hie TSDR Survey contains data on
specific treatment processes at facilities.
The data enable EPA to identify specific
BDAT treatment (and comparable
treatment) in its assessment of both off-
site and on-site capacity. Therefore,
EPA believes that the capacity identified
as available for a specific treatment
technology will be capable of meeting
the BDAT standard, which has been
developed such that a well-designed and
well-operated BDAT treatment process
should be capable of meeting it
In the proposed rule, EPA established
criteria for differentiating between a
liquid and a solid waste because of the
variance for D001 sludges and solid&
EPA requested comments on the
proposed criteria, and during the public
comment period received two comments
requesting clarification of die sludge/
solid definition. EPA also received
several comments identifying additional
sludge/solid incineration capacity.
Commenters identified new units at
existing facilities and increased capacity
resulting from trial burns conducted
after the 1986 survey. Based on an
analysis of this information, EPA has
determined that there is adequate
capacity to incinerate D001 sludge/solid
wastes. Consequently, EPA is not
granting D001 sludge/solids a variance,
and the criteria proposed for
differentiating between a liquid and a
so lid are no longer necessary.
Table lll.B.l.(b)—Required Alterna-
tive Commercial Treatment/Recy-
cling Capacity for Surface-Dis-
posed Wastes
CmOon gaOons/year]
Waste coda
First THrd Codec
F008	
F019-
K004.
K017.
KQ21.
K031.
KD3S.
KB48.
KD49.
KOSO.
(COM.
raw.
•core.
Table ltl.B.i.(b)—Required Alterna-
tive Commercial Treatment/Recy-
cunq Capacity for Surface-Dis-
posed Wastes—Continued
CmiRon galons/year]
203
12a
at
<0.1
<0.1
0j8
<0.1
37.1
91.*
IIS
7&t
124
Waste code
K084.
K089-
K106-
P001_
P004-
POOS-
P010-
P011-
P01J
P015..
P018-
P020.„
P037-
P04S-
P050-
P068-
P069-
P070-
poei_
P067-
P092-
P1OS-
PI OS-
P115-
P120-
PI 23..
U007.
(J009..
U010-
U012.
U019-
U022-
U029-
U031.
UOM_
U007.
1(0*3.
U044.
U060-
U061 -
U081 _
U066-
U087
U077
U07S
U103
U105
U10S
U122
U129
U133
U134
U1S1
U1S4
U158
U159
U177
U180
U1BS
U188
U1B2
U209
U210.
U2t1-
U219-
U220.
Capacity
required
tor
surface-
disposed
waste*
U228.
U227.
U22S.
-------
22634
Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 108 / Friday. June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table tll.B.1.(b)—Required Alterna-
tive Commercial Treatment/Recy-
cling Capacity for Surface-Dis-
posed Wastes—Continued
(rrulSon gallons/year)
Waste code
U237					
0230		
U243.				
U249.		
S. cond Third Code:
F024..				
K105					......
P002_		
P003	-		
P0I4		
P066			
P067		
U002 			
IJ003	-				
U005				......
U008				
U014		
U021				
U032				
U047			
U057	_	_	
U070			
0073			
U060				
U083		
U092		
•U093	
U101	.
U106		
UI09			
U1I4				
U116				
U119			
U127	
U131				
U140-		
"U142...„	—		
U144		
U146...._				
U147_		
U149				
U161				
U162..._		
U165				
U168				
u;.0 					
U196				
U208				
U213			
U2-4				
U217		
U218				
U233...._	.......	.....
U244			
third Third Code:
000	1		
000	2	....					
0C03					
0004					
0006	
000	6			
000	7	
0008..
0009	
0010...
0011-..
001	2	
001	3	
001	4	
001	5		
0016	_
Capacity
reqoied
surface-
deposed
wasi43
Table ltl.B.1 .(b)—Required Alterna-
tive Commercial Treatment/Recy-
cunq Capacity for Surface-Ois-
posed Wastes—Continued
ImriSon gaUons/yearl
1 Multi-source leachate.
c. Capacity Currently Available and
Effective Dates. Table IILB.l.(c) presents
an estimate for each treatment
technology of the volumes of wastes
that will require alternative treatment
before land disposal to comply with the
standards finalized today. The amount.
of capacity that is available at
commercial facilities in each case is also
presented. Available capacity was
calculated using the TSDR Survey ar.d
other capacity data. Available capacity
is equal to the specific treatment
system's maximum capacity minus the
amount used in 1936. In addition, the
available capacity presented in this
section was adjusted to account for
wastes previously restricted from land
disposal by subtracting the capacity
required for land-disposed solvent
wastes. First Third wastes, and Second
Third wastes.
In general. Table QI.B.l.(c) indicates
that there is inadequate capacity for
certain technologies: combustion of
sludges and solids, mercury retorting,
acid leaching followed by chemical
precipitation, thermal recovery, and
vitrification.
For combustion of sludges and solids,
there is inadequate capacity for sludges
and solids derived from treating multi-
source leachate. for K048 through K052
nonwastewaters (temporarily), and doil
and debris. (See section IILB.3 for a
more detailed discussion.) However,
there is adequate capacity for aljrdther
wastes needing combustion of studaen
and solids. For mercury retorting; ftero
is inadequate capacity for high mercury
DOW, K106. and U151 nonwastewaters.
However there is adequate capacity for
other wastes needing this technology.
For acid leaching and chemical
precipitation, there is insufficient
capacity to treat low-mercury D009.
K108, P065, P092, and U151
nonwastewaters. For thermal recovery.
EPA has determined that there is
insufficient capacity for P087
wastewaters and nonwastewaters. For
vitrification, there is inadequate
capacity for arsenic nonwastewaters.
It is important to note that some of the
wastes, because of their actual physical
form, cannot be treated to meet
standards simply by using the
technology identified as BDAT. These
wastes must be treated through several
steps, called a "treatment train." EPA
assumes that the resultant residuals will
also need tu be treated using alternative
technologies before land disposal;
therefore, the total volumes reported
were assigned to appropriate
technologies.
The following sections discuss ihe
results of the individual capacity
analyses and effective dates for each
waste code included in today's final
rule. Table OI.B.l.(d) summarizes all the
surface-disposed wastes for which EPA
is granting a two-year variance. The
detailed basis for EPA's conclusions can
be found in the capacity background
document for this final rule.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22635
Table !II.B.1.(c)—Available and Required Alternative Commercial Treatment (Including Recycling) Capacity for
Surface-Disposed Wastes
[milforts of ga3ons/yr1
~ Tecfnology
Available
capacity
Required
capacity
Vanafca
*c.d seict-ing followed by c3l prec; :aron : 			


0
3
^e3
Valine cwtnnaton											
						
			
7
6
Mo
^-oniatior. 'chewed Sy -ne.-rr.caJ preccrtacon		_....	

	
6
3
No
£ aoqicaJ traatrent								


47
<•1
Mo
3 'JcocjJ veatrnent toJcwec by cfemica1 precipitation 					
					 .. .

14
<1
."-J
;cdation followed £y c.'-emtci! frencrtason								


28
7 ( No
C-9r,-'«U o»idation lo.towed 3> cfrcnium .-eduction and cnerrxal p-ecipttaSon		
				 	

2
2

rrecsicai fecipitaSon	 						 _ 				 . .


333
25
No
Chrorri-jm .-acixion fcio-A-sd 5v ;">emical precipitation .... 	 			
							

96
£5
MO
CcfT-iusiin of liquxJs	 _ 					
						

237
:s
No
Cc-ousiton of siudges.'scliJs			
				

41
•213
Ves
Vrfro/y retorting . 		 							
			

<1
3
res
.¦ieu-s'caton	—	 		
		 -

36
12
.'10
Secondary lead melting							


37
2

Su&fczatic" 	 			-			 		
						
		
»78
!58
¦So
Trerr-a) recoveryJ			 			—			
					

0
<1
.'es
=^7>al -pc-.-very jf cadmium tan^ves


<1
<1-
>io
Vacation	 .... - 							 					


0
22
<9S


1 T.Ts Jacte does no* c,ciuc!e mired raiioactve wastes, wtuch are receiving a national capacity vanance far all applicable treatment :ecnr;icgie5
J EPA .-as insufficient ..su 10 differentiate Setween low and f^h memory nonwastewaters. Consequently, EPA conducted a worst-case analysis and assicied all
;:o-*as:ewater .oluces to toth tha mgh corcertration and •cm concentration technologies fi.e, mercury retorting and acid leaching followed cy crietr.ical
p-ecoitaton. resoec'-.e'v). ~.-A r-ad no oata on ccn/reroal ac«J leaching and chemical precipitation capacity and beueves trere is insufficient capacity >o rreat T.ese
low rr»ercury nonwasiawaters.
' Excusing seco'riary smeivig st lead wastes
»For fun^er cjnficaton ol tna rumSer. see tfle discussion on KC48-K052.
Table lll.S.1 (d)—Summary of National
Ca?ac;ty Variances for Surface-
Disposed Wastes 1
Pacjired arMrraSve
•reaanent technology_
Acd leaching and
cf-erracai precipitation.
Contjus^or of sl'jdge'
iCtaJS
Wj-sjry fx'ocr*}
Secondary meting
Thermal recovery—
Vitnficatton		
v,'as:e code 'Prys*ai
form
0009 Low mercury
nonwastewater.
KI06 Low mercury
nonwastewater.
P085 Low mercury
nonwastewater.
P092 Low mercury
nonwastewater.
IJ151 Low mercury _
nonwastewater.
F039 1 Nonwastewater
K046 J
K049 '
K050 '
KOSt '
K052 3
0C09
Nonwastewater.
Nonwastewater.
Nonwastewater.
Nonwastewater.
Nonwastewater.
High mercury
nonwastewater.
K108 High mercury
nonwastewater.
P06S Wgh mercury
nonwastewater.
P092- High mercury
nonwastewater.
U1S1 High mercury
nonwastewater.
0008 Lead materials
before secordary
srre>t!rg.
P087 Nonwastewater/
wastewater.
0004 Nonwastewater.
K031 Nonwastewater.
K084 Nonwastewater.
K101 Nonwastewater.
K102 Nonwastewater.
Table 311.3.1 .(d)—Summary of National
Capacity Variances for Surface-
Disposed Wastes '—Continued
Required alternate
(reatmer.t technoioqy
Waste code/Physical
form

POtO Nonwastewater.
P011 Nonwastewater.
P012 Nonwastewater.
P036 Nonwastewater.
P038 Nonwastewater.
U136 Nonwastewater.
1 EPA is granting these wastes a two-year national
capacity vanance. ' except for KO*8-KOS2 non-
wastewaters. This table does not include mixed
radioactive wastes, which are receiving a national
capacity vanance for all applicable treatment tectv
	j teachate.
' For K048-K0S2 petroleum-refining norv
wastewaters. EPA 
-------
22836	Federal Register f VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
data for incineration and cement kilns,
EPA has determined that adequate
capacity exists to treat surface-disposed
D001 liquids wastes. Therefore, EPA is
not granting a national capacity
variance for these wastes.
EPA is promulgating deactivation as
the method of treatment for D001
ignitable reactives and oxidizers. EPA
has determined that sufficient capacity
exists for these wastes; therefore, EPA is
not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
For DC01 ignitable compressed gases,
EPA is promulgating deactivation as the
method of treatment EPA has
determined that adequate capacity
exists for these wastes; therefore, EPA is
not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
(b)	Corrosive Characteristic Wastes
(D002). EPA has identified three
treatability groups for D002 wastes:
acids, alkalines, and other corrosives.
EPA is promulgating deactivation, which
includes neutralization, as the method of
treatment for the D002 acid and alkaline
subcategories. In addition, recovery of
acids or bases is included as an option
far these standards. By definition,
wastes in these subcategories are
liquids; therefore based on the limited
number cf surface impoundments that
meet minimum technology requirements
and the ban on liquids in landfills, EPA
believes that few, if any. of these wastes
are surface-disposed. For the capacity
analysis, EPA assigned all D0Q2 wastes
to neutralization. EPA has determined
that sufficient neutralization capacity
does exist for acid and alkaline D002
v. jstes that are surface-disposed;
therefore, EPA is not granting a national
capacity variance for them.
For the D002 other corrosives
category. EPA is promulgating
deactivation as the method of treatment
These wastes can be deactivated using
chemical reagents or by other means. In
addition. EPA believes that these wastes
are generated in low volumes.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
rational capacity variance for them.
(c)	P.eactive Characteristic Wastes
(D003). For D003 wastes, EPA has
identified five treatabihty-groups:
reactive cyanides, explosives, water
reactives. reactive sulfides, and other
reactives. For D003 cyanides. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on alkaline chlorination, wet-air
oxidation, or electrolytic oxidation.
Although reactive cyanides account for
the majority of D003 generated wastes.
EPA believes that most are already
restricted from landfills by existing
regulations (40 CFR Part 264.312,
265.312). EPA believes that sufficient
capacity does exist for th<) volume of
surface-disposed D003 cyanide reactive
wastes; therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
For D003 reactive sulfides, EPA is
promulgating deactivation as the
method of treatment which includes
chemical oxidation. EPA believes
sufficient capacity does exist for the
volume of surface-disposed D003 sulfide
wastes; therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
For D003 explosive wastes, EPA is
promulgating deactivation as the
method of treatment Because most of
these wastes are already restricted from
land disposal by existing regulations
and are commonly burned and/or
detonated. EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
For D003 watsr-reactive wastes, EPA
is promulgating deactivation as the
method of treatment EPA believes that
these wastes are generated sporadically
and in low volumes and are not
typically land-disposed. Therefore. EPA
is not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
For other reactive D003 wastes. EPA
promulgating deactivation as die
method of treatment EPA believes these
wastes could be incinerated or
detonated openly and that there is
adequate capacity for treating the small
volumes that are surface-disposed.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(d) EP Toxic HaJogenated Pesticide
Wastes.
D012—Characteristic of EP Toxic for Endrin
D013—Characteristic of EP Toxic for Lindane.
D014—Characteristic of EP Toxic for
Methoxychiar
DOIS—Characteristic of EP Toxic for
Toxaphene
D016—Characteristic of EP Toxic for 2,4-0
D017—Characteristic of EP Toxic for 2.4,5-TP
For these EP toxic halogenated.
pesticide nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on incineration. For D012 and'
C015 wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
incineration or biological treatment as
methods of treatment; for D013
wastewaters, EPA has set incineration
or carbon adsorption as methods of
treatment; for D014 wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating incineration or wet-air
oxidation as methods of treatment; for
D016 and D017 wastewaters, EPA has
set incineration or chemical oxidation as
methods of treatment EPA has also set
biodegradation as an alternate method
of treatment for DO10 nonwastewaters.
EPA has determined that sufficient
treatment capacity exists for these
wastes; therefore, EPA is not granting
EP toxic pesticide wastewaters and -
nonwastewaters a national capacity
variance.
(2) Metal Wastes. This group include0
arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium, silver, thaliiui.
and vanadium wastes.
(a] Arsenic Wastes
DOM—EP Toxic for arsenic
K031—By-product salts genrated in ihe
production of MS MA and cacodyiic acid
K084—Wastewater treatment shidges
generated durihg the production of
veterinary pharmaceuticals from arsenic
or organo-arsenic compounds
K101—Distillation tar residues from the
distillation of aniline-bassd compounds
in the production of verterinary
pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organo-
arsenic compounds
K102—Residues from the use of activated
carbon for decolorization in the
production of veterinary pharmaceut'cals
from arsenic or organo-arsenic
compounds
P010—Arsenic acid
P011—Arsenic (V] oxide
P012—Arsenic (III] oxide
PC36—Dichlorophenylarsine
POM—Diethylarsir.e
U138—Cacodylic acid
For arsenic nonwastewaters^S'A is
promulgating concentration st&fards
based on vitrification. EPA has
determined that for some arsenic
nonwastewaters the standards can be
met with chemical or thermal oxidation
to the arsenate form followed by
chemical precipitation with iron salts
followed by arsenic stabilization of the
precipitate. This technology may be
inappropriate for all arsenic
nonwastewaters because crganics are
known to interfere with the stabilization
process. EPA believes vitrification will
work for all forms of arsenic
nonwastewaters. because high
temperatures are expected to destroy
the organo-metallic bonds, and
therefore, its performance is not limited
by the presence of organics. Thus, EPA
has assigned arsenic nonwastewaters to
vitrification for the capacity analysis.
The TSDR Survey indicates that no
commercial vitrification capacity exists.
EPA requested information on
commercial vitrification capacity, but
received no comments demonstrating
that this type of capacity exists.
Therfore, EPA Is granting a two-year
capacity variance to the surface-
disposed arsenic nonwastewaters listed
above.
For arsenic wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical precipitation. The
TSCR Survey and other capacity data
indicate that adequate chemical
precipitation capacity exists* therefore.
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday. June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22637
EPA is not granting arsenic wastewaters
a capacity variance.
(b)	Barium Wastes. For D005 and P013
wastewaters. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation: for D005 and
F013 (except as indicated below)
nonwastewaters. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
stabilization.
For P013 nonwastewaters with high
levels of organics, EPA is requiring that
these wastes be incinerated prior to
stabilization. Sufficient capacity exists
to treat surface-disposed D005 and P013
wastes. Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(c)	Cadmium Wastes. For D006
wastes, EPA is promulgating treatment
standards for three categories:
wastewaters, nonwastewaters, and
cadmium batteries.
For D008 wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical precipitation. For
D006 nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization or metal
recover}-. EPA believes that sufficient
capacity exists to treat surface-disposed
cadmium nonwastewaters and
wastewaters. Therefore. EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
For D006 cadmium batteries. EPA is
promulgating thermal recovery as the
method of treatment In the proposed
r-tle, EPA proposed granting D006
cadmium batteries a national capacity
variance due to alack of identified
recoveiy capacity. During the public
comment period, two commenters
• identified available commercial
cadmium battery recovery capacity
(these comments were available for
reply comments). EPA contacted these
commenters to verify their capacity.
Based on these contacts, EPA received
additional information and determined
tiidt adequate capacity for treating
surface-disposed cadmium batteries
exists. Therefore. EPA is not granting
0008 cadmium Datteries a national
capacity variance.
(d)	Chromium Wastes. For D007
chromium and U032 (calcium chromate)
wastewaters. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on t
chromium reduction followed by-
chemical precipitation; for D007 and
U032 nonwastewaters. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chromium reduction followed
by stabilization. EPA believes sufficient
treatment capacity exists for the volume
of these wastes. Therefore. EPA is not
granting-a national capacity variance for
them.
' (e) Lead Wastes.
D008—EP toxic for lead
PX10—Tetraethyl lead
U144—Lead acetate
U145—Lead phosphate
U148—Lead subacetate
KO09—Emissision control dust/sludge from
secondary lead smelting
K100—Waste leaching solution from acid
leaching of emission control dust/sludge
from secondary lead smelting
For D008 wastes, EPA is promulgating
standards for three categories:
nonwastewaters, wastewaters, and
lead-acid batteries. For D008
nonwastewater lead wastes, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization, except where the
waste contains significant
concentrations of organics. In this case,
these wastes may need to be incinerated
prior to stabilization. For D0G8
wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation. EPA believes
sufficient capacity exists for surface-
disposed D008 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters. Therefore. EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
D008 wastewaters and nonwastewaters.
with the exceptions noted below.
EPA is promulgating thermal recovery
as the method of treatment for lead-acid
batteries. Secondary lead smelters have
stated that they store these wastes in
piles prior to recovery. EPA has
indicated in a previous rulemaking that
the shells surrounding lead-acid
batteries are considered to be storage
containers (see 47 FR12318 and 40 CFR
284.314(f)(3)). Therefore, to the extent
that lead-acid battery storage meets all
the requirements of the LDR storage
prohibitions at 40 CFR 268.50, such
storage is permissible.
In the proposed rule, EPA solicited
comments on the management of other
D008 lead material at secondary
smelters. EPA also indicated that
storage of lead materials in waste piles
prior to smelting is a form of land
disposal, and as such these staging
areas are subject to the statutory
prohibitions. During the public comment
period. EPA received several comments
from the secondary lead smelting
industry regarding the storage of battery
parts prior to smelting. Several
commenters expressed concern that
EPA's determination that staging piles
are a form of land-disposal could force
them to close or operate out of
compliance while staging piles are
replaced by tanks (assuming tank
storage is viable). As a result of these
comments, EPA contacted several
secondary smelters to asses the
potential capacity impact of required
staging area reconstruction. Because of
Ihe large volume of batteries currendy
processed at smelting facilities whose
continued storage operation remains in
question. EPA is granting a two-year
national capacity variance to allow
storage of the batteries preceding
smelting. EPA is also reconsidering
whether certain forms of battery parts
storage meet the meaning of "land
disposal" under section 3004(k). In
particular, if battery parts (or other
wastes) are stored in 3-sided tank-like
devices on concrete inside buildings (the
present storage method of some
secondary lead smelters) the Agency is
not certain that the language and
policies underlying section 3004(k)
warrant designating such practice as
"land disposal." Given the two-year
national capacity variance in this rule,
however, the Agency need not make a
final decision on this point in this
rulemaking.
For P110. U144. U145. and U146
wastes. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
chemical oxidation followed by
chemical precipitation for wastewaters,
and stabilization for nonwastewaters.
Plia U144. U14S, and U146
nonwastewaters containing significant
concentrations of organics may Require
incineration prior to stabilization. EPA
believes sufficient capacity exists for
the small volume of these waStel that
are surface-disposed: therefore. EPA is
not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
EPA is revoking the no land disposal
standard based on recycling standard
promulgated in the First Third rule for
the non-calcium sulfate subcategory for
K069 nonwastewaters. For K069 calcium
sulfate nonwastewaters. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization. For K069 non-
calcium sulfate nonwastewaters. EPA is
promulgating recycling as the method of
treatment. For K069 wastewaters. EPA i3
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical precipitation. EPA
believes adequate capacity exists to
treat the volume of surface-disposed
K069 wastewaters a.id nonwastewaters:
therefore. EPA is not granting a capacity
variance for them.
For KlOO nonwastewaters. EPA is
revoking the no land disposal standard
based on the "no generation standards"
promulgated in the First Third rule.
Today. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
stabilization for the nonwastewaters
and chemical precipitation for the
wastewaters. EPA believes adequate
capacity exists to treat the volume of
surface-disposed KlOO wastes.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
capacity variance for them.
-------
22838
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
(f) Mercury Wastes.
D009—EP toxic for mercury
K071—Brine purification muds from the
mercury cell process in chlorine
production, where separately repurified
brine is not used
K106—Wastewater traatmer.t sludges from
the mercury cei! process in chlorine
production
P065—Meirury fuL-.inate
P0S2—Phenylmerciirc acetile
U151—Mercury
For D0C9, K106. and Ulol
wastewaters. EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation. For PG65 and
P092 wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
con-.en'ration standards based on
chemicui oxidation followed by
chemical precipitation. K071 wastewater
standards were promulgated in the First
Third nils and remain unchanged. It
shouid be noted that mercury-bearing
wastewaters containing hexavaient
chromium may require chromium
reduction prior to treatment of the
mercury. likewise, wastewaters
containing organics may require
chemical oxidation prior to treatment of
the mercury.
For met wury nonwastewaters, EPA is
establishing low mercury and high
mercury subcategories. For the high
mercury subcategory (greater than or
equal to 260 mg/kg), EPA is
promulgating roasting or retorting as
methods of treatment for 0009, K106,
and U151 nonwastewaters. For the high
mercury subcategory of P065 and P092
nonv'-astewaters, EPA is promulgating
incineration followed by roasting or
retorting as the method of treatment. For
" tile low mercury subcategory of D009;
K1O0, P065. P092. and U151
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on acid
leaching and chemical precipitation.
Treatment standards for K071
nonwastewaters were originally
promulgated in the First Third rile. In
the proposed Third Third rule, EPA
proposed to revise the standards for
K071 nonwastewaters with a high
mercury content. For this high mercury
subcategory. EPA proposed roasting or
retorting as methods of treatment For
the final rule, EPA is not adopting the
pioposed revisions to K071 wastes, and
the promulgated First Third BDAT
remains unchanged.
EPA believes sufficient capacity
exists to treat the volume of all surface-
disposed mercury wastewaters.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
Because current data do not provide
sufficient information on the volume of
uon waste waters that contain high and
low concentrations of mercury, EPA
conducted a worst-case analysis and
assigned all volumes of surface disposed
mercury nonwastewaters to both
mercury retorting and acid leaching
followed by chemical precipitation. EPA
has identified a small amount of
commercial mercury retorting capacity
(16,000 gallons]. There is insufficient
mercury retorting capacity for D009,
K106, and U151 nonwastewaters. Due to
the sporadic generation rate of P wastes
from year to year and the small amount
of available commercial mercury
retorting capacity. EPA is granting all
high mercury nonwastewaters a two-
year national capacity variance. EPA
has also determined that there is
insufficient commercial capacity for acid
leaching followed by chemical
precipitation; therefore, EPA is granting
low mercury D009, K106, P065, P092. and
U151 nonwastewaters a national
capacity variance.
(g)	Selenium wastes.
0010—EP Toxic for selenium
Pi 03—Selraourea
PU4—Thallium seienite
U204—Selenious acid
U205—Selenium disulfide
For selenium nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization. EPA has also
determined that vitrification or recovery
may be used to reach the standards. The
TSDR Survey and other capacity data
indicate that adequate stabilization
capacity exists. Therefore, EPA is not
granting selenium nonwastewaters a
national capacity variance.
For selenium wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical precipitation. The
TSDR Survey and other capacity data
indicate that adequate chemical,
precipitation capacity exists: therefore.
EPA is not granting selenium
wastewaters a national capacity
variance.
(h)	Silver Wastes.
DOll—EP toxic for silver
P099—Potassium silver cyanide
P104—Silver cyanide
Treatment standards for PC99 and
Pi04 nonwastewaters were promulgated
in the Second Third final rule. For P099
and Pi04 wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical precipitation. For
DOll, EPA is promulgating concentration
standards based on chemical
precipitation for wastewaters, and
recovery or stabilization for
nonwastewaters. EPA believes adequate
capacity exists to treat surface-disposed
DOll, P099, and PI04 wastewaters and
DOll nonwastewaters. Therefore, EPA is
not granting a capacity variance for
them.
(i) Thallium Wastes.
Pi V3—Thdliic oxide
Pin—Thaliijia seletLia
Pi IS—Thalliiira (I] sulfate
L'^14—Thallium II) aceta;e
U215—Thallium (I'l carbonan
(.'213—Thallium (l) chloride
U217—Thallium (Ij nitrate
For P113, F115, U214, U215, U216. and
U217. EPA is promulgating thermal
recovery or stabilization S3 methods of
treatment for nonwastewaters, ar.J
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation for wastewnlers.
For P114, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based or.
stabilization, vitrification, recoveiy fcr
nonwastewaten, and chemical
precipitation for wastewaters. Based nn
the TSDR Survey and other capjciry
data, adequate capacity exists for
surface-disposed thallium wastewaters
and nonwastewaters. Therefore, EPA is
not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
(j) Vanadium Wastes.
P119—Ammonium vanadate	!
P120—Vanadium pentoxide "
For P119 and Pi 20, EPA is ^ |
promulgating stabilization a3 the rre'.hor'
of treatment for nonwastewaters, and
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation for wastewaters.
Because adequate capacity exists for
chemical precipitation and stabilization.
EPA is not granting P119 and Pi 20
wastewaters and nonwastewaters a
national capacity variance.
(3) Treatment Standards for
Remaining F and K Wastes and U051.
These groups include certain F002 and
F0C5 wastes; F006 wastewaters and
F019; F024; F025; K001 and U051; wastes
from pigment production (K002 through
K008); K011, KOI 3, K014; KOI 5; K017 and
K073; K021; K022; K025, K023, K035. and
K083; K028, K029, K095, and K096; K032,
K033. K034, K041, K097, and K098
wastes; K038 and K037; K042, K085, and
K105 wastes: K044. K045. K046, KG47:
KQ48 through K052; K060; K061
wastewaters; and K088.
(a) Additional Treatment Standards
for F002 and FOOS Wastes. Treatment
standards for F002 and Fl>05 were
promulgated in the Solvents and Dioxins
rule. Today, EPA is revising the
treatment standards for F0U2 and F005
to account for four newly listed F902
and F005 constituents. Wastewatf r
concentration standards for F002
containing 1,1.2-Trichloroethane find
F005 containing benzene are based on:
biological treatment or steam stripping,
or carbon adsorption, or liquid
-------
F I Register / Vot 55. Me. Mft / Friday, June t, 1980 / Rules and Etegillattons:	22839
ex traction-Foe nonwastewaters,,
concentration standards- fat thaw two
solvents are based on iwmpratkwr. For
F005 containing, 2-Ethoxyethanol, EPA. is
promiirgiiing incinerationasthe method
of treatment for nonwastewaters, and
incineration or biodegradation aa
methods of treatment for wastewaters.
Fcr F005 wastewaters containing 2-
nitropropare, EPA is promulgating''
incinceration, or wet-air oxidation
followed by carbon adsorption; or
chemical oxidation' followed by carbon
adsorption as methods, of. treatment Far
FOCS nonwastewaters containing 2-
nitropropane, EPA is-requiring
incineration as the method of treatment
EPA believes that adequate treatment
capacity exists for these wastes;,
therefore, EPA is: not granting: a national
capacity variance for them.
(b)	F006 and F819> Wastes; For FQ0&
wastewaters, EPA is promulgating,
concentration standards based oa
alkaline chlorination foe cyanidea and
chromium reduction followed bjs
chemical precipitation for me talk EPA
believes thatadequate capacity exists
for the volume of surface-disposed FC08
wastewaters. Therefore,. EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
EPA is promulgating concentration
standards for F019 wastewaters based
on alkaline chlorination for cyanidea
and chromium reduction fallowed by<
chemical precipitation for chromium. In
the proposed ride, EPA proposed
treatment standards for amenable and
total cyanide in F018< nonwastewaters
based on wefc-airoxidatian. Due ta
insufficient! wet-air oxidation capacity*
EPA proposed, a national capacity
variance for these-wastes. In the final
rule, EPA is promulgating FBW-
nonwastewater concentration standard*
based on alkaline chlopination foe
cyanide* and stabilization far
chromium. Because sufficient treatment
capacity exists to treat the FW91
wastewaters and nonwastewetera^EPA
is not granting a natiaHalaapaatff
variance for them.
(c)F024	Wastes. EPftpBomnlg&ted
concentration standasdsfbfFU&fc
wastewaters and nonwastewaters in the-
Second Third rule based on rotary kiln
incineration fas the organic constituents,
in nonwastewaters, and rotary loin
incineration for organic. constituents
followed by chemical precipitation for
metal constituents in wastewaters
Today, EPA is. revising, certain: of these-
standards aadiiejpioauilgating.
concentration, standards based on
stabilization for metal eonstituenfes in>
F024 nonwastewaters; EPA is psoviding/
the option of incineration ia a treatment
method fortius waste La order ta remove
obstacles to acceptance. previously
createdbj the explicit standard for
dioxins and furaos.. Several commenters
responded to EPA.'s request for
information, indicating thai! the
treatment facilities were not accepting
the wastes due to the dioxin and furan-
standard. Today's, revisions to the
treatment standards ar? expected ta
ensure that sufficient capacity is
' available to treat F024, and-that all F024-
wastes containing; dioxins and furana
will be incinerated, thereby ensuring
effective traatment of these constituents.
EPA has determined that adequate-
capacity exists to treat these
wastewaters and nonwastewaters;
therefore,, EPA is net granting a national
capacity variance for than;
(d)	F025 Wastes^ On December 11»
1969 (54 FR 50988); EPA amended the
listing for F025 waste (.condensed light
ends, spent filters and filter aids; and
spent desiccant wastes from the
production, of certain chlorinated
aliphatics). The listing becomes effective
on June 11,1990. Most generators
already treat E025-aa if it were
hazardous, and some facilities,
commingle F024 and E025. Today, EPA.
is pmrniilgating concentration standards
for all categories of F025 wastewaters
and nonwastewaters based on
incineration. EPA has. determined that
no alternative treatment capacity ia
needed for FQ2S wastes. Therefore, EPA
is not granting these wastes a national
capacity variance, restricting land
disposal on August 8,1990..
(e)	K001 and U03i Wastes. EPA is-
promulgating revisions to the
concentration-based treatment
standards forKQBl organic&doe to a
mathematical error that was-made in the
the First Third rale. Since the treatment
standards foe UQ51 wastewaters and
nonwastawatam are- baaed on a transfer
of the performance of. K001, the
concentration-based standards foe U0S1
als»reflect this change. Foe the organlca
in KOQlandUOSl wastewaters and
nonwastewaters, EPA ia promulgating
concentration standards-based an.
incineration; EPA is. also, finalizing
concentration standards for lead, in K00L
and UQ51 based' on stabilization for
nonwastewatess and chemical,
precipitation for wastewaters. Sufficient
capacity exists foe treatment of both of
these wastes; therefore. EPA is not
gsantin&a national capacity variance for
them..
(H Wastes-, from Inorganic Pigment)
Production (KOOt.KOa* KGO* KOQS,
K006, K087, aodK8Q8)» EPA is amending
the not land disposal standard psevfously
promulgated Eta K004t KQQ5, KQ97. and
K008 nonwastewaters. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chromium reduction followed
by chemical precipitation for K0Q2, K003,
K004, KOOfl, and KQ0&wastewaters, and
alkaline chlorination followed by
chromium reduction followed by
chemical precipitation for K0G5 and
K007 wastewaters; For non waste walar
forms of these wastes* EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization. EPA believes
that sufficient capacity exists for
surface-disposed KD02, KQC3, K004,
K005, KOOft, K007, and K«X» wastewaters
and nonwastewaters; Therefore, EPA i»
not granting a capacity variance for
them; _
(g) K011. K013vand K014 Wastes.
Treatment standards for the surface
disposal of nonwastewater forms of
K011, K013. and K914 were promulsated
in the Second Third final rule. For KQ11.
K013, and K014 wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on wet-air oxidation. The TSDR
Survey indicates that sufficient capacity,
exists for the volume of surface^
disposed KOll, K013, and K01*
wastewaters Therefore. EPA isnot
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
(hj K0T5 Wastes. EPA is revoking the
no land disposal based on no-generation
standard previonsiypromulgated for
K015 (benzyl chloride distillation
wastes) nonwastewaters-because of the
reported generation of ash containing
this waste. Consequently, for K015
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards for five organic
and two metal constituents based on
incineration followed by stabilization.
Sufficient capacity exists to treat this
waste; therefore, EPA ia not granting a
national capacity variance for KU15
nonwastewaters.
(i) KOl^ and KD73 Wastes.
K0W—Hoavy and* (still bottoms) bom the
purification-column in the? production of
epichlorohyddn.
K073—Chlorinated hydrocarbon waste from,
the purification step of t&e dlaphragm cell'
process using graphite anodes in chlorine
production
In today's rule, EPA is promulgating
final treatment standards for K017 and
K073 wastewaters and nonwastewaters^
Concentration standards for the
wastewater and nonwastewater format
of these wastes are* based on>
incineration; Sufficient' capacity existB
to treat these, wastes.Therefore, EPA fs
not granting s national capacity
variance for K017 and K073 wastes.
K021 Wastea.
-------
22640
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday. June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
K021—Aqueous spent antimony catalyst from
fluoromethane production
Concentration standards are being
promulgated today for wastewater and
nonwastewater forms of K021 based on
Incineration. EPA is also promulgating
concentration standards for antimony
~onwastewaters based on stabilization
and antimony wastewaters based on
chemical precipitation. Sufficient
capacity exists to treat these wasteB.
Therefore, EPA is not granting K021
wastes a national capacity variance.
(k} K022, K025, K026, K035, and K083
Wastes. EPA is promulgating treatment
standards for K022 wastewaters and all
forms of K025, K026, K035, and K083
wastes. Treatment standards being
promulgated today for K025 and K083
would replace current treatment
standards of "No Land Disposal Based
on No Generation" that were
promulgated in prior rules.
For organics contained in K022, K035,
and K083 wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on: biological treatment or steam
stripping, or carbon adsorption, or liquid
extraction. Concentration standards
promulgated for metals in K022 and
K083 wastewaters are based on
chemical precipitation. For organics in
K035 and K083 nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on incineration. For metals in
K083 nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization of incinerator
For K025 and K026, EPA is
promulgating incineration as the method
oFtreatment for wastewaters and
nonwastewaters. In addition, EPA is
also promulgating liquid-liquid
extraction followed by steam stripping
followed by carbon adsorption as an
alternative method of treatment for K025
wastewaters.
EPA has determined that adequate
capacity exists for K022 wastewaters,
and the wastewater and nonwastewater
forms of K025, K026, K035, and K083.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for these
W&8t69.
(1) K028, K029, K095, and K096
Wastes.
K028—Spent catalyst from hydrochlorinator
reactor in the production of 1.1,1-
trlchloroe thane
K029—Waste from the product steam stripper
in the production of 1,1,1-tiichloroethane
K09S—Distillation bottoms from the
production of 1.1,1-trlchloroe thane
K096—Heavy ends from the heavy ends
column from the production of 1,1,1-
trichlore thane
Treatment standards based on
incineration were promulgated for K028
wastewaters and nonwastewaters and
the nonwastewaters forms of K029,
K095, and K096 in the Second Third rule.
Today, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards for organics in
K029, K095 and KO90 wastewaters based
on incineration. EPA is also
promulgating concentration standards
for metal constituents in K028
nonwastewaters based on stabilization.
Sufficient capacity exists to treat these
wastes. Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for K028,
K029, K095 and K096.
(m) K032, K033, K034, K041, K097, and
K098 Wastes.
K032—Wastewater treatment sludge from the
production of chlordane
K033—Wastewater treatment scrubber water
from the chlorination of cyclopentadiene in
the production of chlordane
K034—Filter solids from filtration of
hexachlorocyclopentadiene in the
production of chlordane
KM1—Wastewater treatment sludge from the
production of toxaphene
K097—Vacuum stripper discharge from the
chlordane chlorinator in the production of
chlordane
K08S—Untreated process wastewater from
the production of toxaphene
For K032, K033, K034. K041, K097, and
K098 wastewaters and nonwastewaters.
EPA is promulgating concentration
standards based on incineration.
Sufficient capacity exists for treatment
of these wastes: therefore, EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
(n) K036 and K037 Wastes. EPA
promulgated a treatment standard of
"no land disposal based on no
generation" for K036 nonwastewaters in
the First Third rule. EPA also
promulgated concentration standards
based on incineration for K037
wastewaters and nonwastewaters in the•
First Third rule. Today, EPA is revising ..
these treatment standards for the
nonwastewater form of K036 (still
bottoms from toluene reclamation
distillation in the production of
disulfoton) and the wastewater form of
K037 (wastewater treatment sludges
from die production of disulfoton).
Today, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards for K038
nonwastewaters based on incineration.
EPA believes that adequate capacity
exists for these surface-disposed K036
nonwastewaters. Therefore, EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
For K037 wastewaters, EPA is revising
the concentration standard from one
based on rotary kiln incineration to one
based on biological treatment EPA
believes that adequate capacity exists
for surface-disposed K037 wastewaters;
therefore, EPA is not granting a national
capacity variance for them,
(o) K042, K085, and K105 Wastes.
K042—Heavy ends or distillation residues
from the distillation of tetrachlorobenzene
in the production of 2.4,5-T
K085—Distillation of fractionation column
bottoms from the production of
chlorobenzenes
K105—Separated aqueous stream from the
reactor product washing step in the
production of chlorobenzenes
For K042, K085, and K105 wastewaters
and nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on incineration. Sufficient
capacity exists for treatment of these
wastes; therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(p) K044, K045, K046, K047 Wastes.
For K044, K045. and K047. EPA is
revoking the "no land disposal"
standard promulgated in the First Third
rule. EPA is promulgating deactivation
as the method of treatment for
wastewaters and nonwastewaters. EPA
has determined adequate capacity
exists to treat these wastes; therefore.
EPA is not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
Today, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards for K046
reactive nonwastewaters based on
deactivation followed by stabilization.
For K046 reactive wastewaters. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on deactivation and chemical
precipitation. Deactivation includes
chemical reduction or detonation. In the
First Third rule. EPA promulgated
treatment standards based on1
stabilization for K046 nonreactive
nonwastewaters. For K046 nonreactive
wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
deactivation followed by chemical
precipitation. EPA has determined that
adequate capacity exists for these
wastes. Therefore, EPA is not granting
them a national capacity variance.
(q) Petroleum Refining Wastes (K048-
K052). EPA 1b promulgating treatment
standards for organic constituents and
cyanides in K04&-K052 based on data
from incineration, solvent extraction.
For the metals in K04&-K052, EPA is
promulgating treatment standards based
on stabilization and chemical
precipitation. EPA is not revising the
promulgated BDAT treatment standards
for organic or metal constituents in
K048-K052 wastewaters, nor for cyanide
in nonwastewaters. In addition, today's
rule deletes the treatment standards
proposed for arsenic and selenium in
nonwastewater forms of K04&-K052
based on stabilization. Today's rule ulso
promulgates revised'treatment
-------
Federal Register /- Vd. 55* Mo. IOC / Friday, fvne 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22vMl
standards for nickel and. totalchromium,
in nonwaslewater formaof &04&-K052:
based on stahitirartrnr.
TheTSDR Survey indicates that
842.000 tona of K04S-K052 will require
treatment capacity (i.e., will be
displaced from land disposal and will
require treatment). EPA recognizes,
however, that this information is dated;
and to this end undertook to obtain as
current an assessment of demand for
treatment capacity as possible;
Based on informal contact with the
petroleum industry trsdi association, it
appears that the industry may be able to
manage approximately three quarters-of
thesa wattes on-site after August 1990)
in ways not involving land disposal
fprimarily in-honse incineration* use as:
fuel, or use in coking). (This figure is
based cn an informal survey of 93 API
member companies and assumes that
none of die pending no migration
petitions foe land treatment unita will be
rjrantadl However., this'estimate does
not account for the uncertainty and
timing of constructing and obtaining:
permits for on-site disposal/treatment
facilities.) Therefore, assuming.beat case
(i.e., on-site capacity is available),.this,
results in approximately 1B1.Q00 tons per
year of wastes that will require
alternative treatment capacity.
EPA estimated that 100,000 tons of
capacity for treatment of K048-K052
wastes existed in1 the-form of solid}
incineration capacity and fuel
substitution capacity (these wastes are
suitable for useas.alternative fuels in
industrial furnaces provided that they
are dewateredifirst). There is very little
commercial solvent extraction capacity
" presently on-line. (EPA knows of satire,
.imall volume mobile solvent extraction
units being.utilized in. California, but
these units provide limited volumetria
;reatment capacity.) Thns^basedon. -
these data, them would be a capacity
sh onfall of approximately 60,00a tons:as
of May 8i*
However, EPA is aware of one-large
comrr.eiciai incinerate!.which could
come on line after Magfctkkt could.
provi-Js additional substantial volumes
of cap3t.:iy (iM,00frton»nf raw annual
capacity in addition, to the 100,000 tons
of existing capacity): for f3Q4ft-KD52
wastes. This facility is presendy seeking
1 It was tin the basis of this analysis that EPA.
senior management tentatively eondtulfed that »
one-year notional-capacity extension mighi'b*
ranted. which draftdetraiinattonwaa>
i-ommunicateil to ail Interested parties. By letter lata
m April. a copy of whlchi* available iirttie docket
fhis was not a.SnaLEPA dedsSm-hoarever, and1
5PA continued to monitor the situation. The-
Jetermianton in the final rule reflects more
.'.ifbmdtion than was available to EPA' at the time
<-¦!. its tentative determination.
a ne-migratien variance from EPA
regarding disposal of scrubber water
into a deep injection welt If the petition
is granted, this facility would provide
sufficient capacity to accommodate -
treatment demand posed by petroleum
wastes. A final decision on the no-
migration petition is expected within the
next six weeks, (There could still-be-
short-term logistic difficulties associated
with getting.wastes to the facility and
the facility coming-on-line that could
prevent immediate utilization of this
capacity, however.}
EPA also recently became aware
(within- the fast two weeks) of additional
solids incineration-capacity which is
presently available that would provide
significant additional treatment eapacity
for petroleum wastes. This technology,
however, requires that wastes undergo a
specialized dewatering pretreatment
step. The treatment company presendy
has twa mobile dowatering pretreatment
units and (according toitsestimates)
can adds two additional! dewatering units
every three months-This-limited amount
of pretreatment equipment(there are
approximately 190 pefroteum facilities
to be serviced) could create a temporary
treatment bottleneck to usa the.
incineration capacity. (This information
appears to have been presented to the
petroleum industry by the treatment
company late hr 1989; so that EPA does
not see notice and! comment problems
vts-a-vts the petroleum industry in.
relying on the information in this-
rulemaking.)
Based on this infannatinn.EPA has
decided to grant & six-month, national
capacity variance for these wastes;
lasting; until November 7, T990; CFhis
effectivefy extends the industry's
prohibition compliance date three
months- ftom the. date, established in. the
first third rulemaking); EPA believes
that by this date, there wilt be adequate:
pretreatment capacity as well as
incineration and Aiel substitution
capacity to-satisfy demand. There also
maybe solvent- extraction capacity
available-by that date, although there
are sharply conflictmyestimates.inthe
record of how quickly solvent extraction
capacity canbe brought on-One. EPA
would be unjustified however in-
extending- tbe- national capacity
variance until solvent extraction
capacity is available. See S> Rep. No.
284,98th• Tfcus, EPA's decision
today is based on its best estimates of
when treatment capacity of any type
will be available to accommodate these
wastes.
EPA recognizes that these data are
not the most precise, in some cases. In
addition; EPA is concerned with using
data that.it obtains at the very end of
the rulemaking in making such decisions,
(albeit these data tend to corroborate
other existing information regarding
amounts of 3olids combustion capacity
coming on-line). Therefore, based on
further information provided to EPA,
EPA may amend the capacity extension
in today's rule (through tuaof
appropriate rulemaking procedures).
(r) K060 Wastes. Today EPA is
revoking the. "no land disposal" based
on a no generation standard
promulgated foe K06Q nonwastewaters
in the First Thirdrula~ instead, for K06O
nonwastewaters, EPA i& also
promulgating concentration standards
based on incineration. EPA is .
establishing concentration standards for
KOGO wastewaters based on biological
treatment.EPA believes- that, adequate
capacity exists for the volume of
surface-disposed K060,wastewaters and
nonwastewaters requiring treatment
Therefore, EPA is nat granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(s) K081 Wastes. Today, EPA.is
promulgating concentration standards
based on chemical reduction followed
by chemical-precipitation for K061
wastewaters. EPA believes adequate
capacity exists for the volume of
surface-disposed K061 wastewaters.
Therefore. EPA is not granting a
variance far them*.
(t) Revisions (a K0B6 Wastes. EPA
promulgated concentration standards
for KOSff solvent washes, in. the; First
Third rule based en incineration and
stabilization of ash for nonwastewaters,.
anrf incineration drnimmiff
reduction, followed by chronical;
precipitation for wastewaters! EPA is
promulgating: revised concentration
standards for all KSafr wastewater forms,
of these wastes; basedoa biologies!
treatment or wet-air oxidation followed
by carbon adsorptioniorchemicaL
oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption for organfes, chromium
reduction followed by chemical:
precipitation for metals, and alkaline
chlcrination for cyanfdes. For
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based'on
incineration fbrorganicx followed by
stabilization formetals. As a "worst-
-------
22642	Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
case" analysis, EPA included in the
capacity analysis conducted for First
Third wastes all of the K088 wastes
identified in the TSDR Survey.
Consequently, no additional capacity
will be required by today's rule, and no
capacity variance is being granted for
KG83 wastes.
(4) Treatment Standards for U and P
Wastes. Today's rule promulgates
treatment standards and capacity
determinations for wastewater and
nonwastewater forms of U and P wastes
(as defined in 40 CFR 281.33 (e) and (f)).
Treatment standards and capacity
determinations for other U and P wastes
that are listed specifically as metal salts
or organo-metallics are discussed in
previous sections of today's rule. This
section also includes a discussion of U
and P wastes that have been identified
as potentially reactive, primarily as
gases, or as cyanogens.
In the proposed rule, EPA grouped all
of the U and P wastes into various
treatability groups based on (1)
similarities in elemental composition
(e.g., carbon, halogens, and metals); and
(2) the presence of key functional groups
(e.g., phenolics, esters, and amines)
within the structure of the individual
chemical represented. EPA has also
accounted for physical and chemical
factors that are known to affect the
selection of treatment alternatives and
to affect the performance of the
treatment such as volatility and
solubility, when developing these
treatability groups. ~
While EPA presented the proposed
treatment standards and capacity
¦determinations for U and P wastes -.
according to these treatability groups,
the promulgated treatment standards
and capacity determinations are
presented as follows: (a) Concentration-
based standards for wastewaters; (b)
concentration-based standards for
non*astewaters; (c) technology-based
standards for wastewaters: and (d)
technology-based standards for
nonwastewaters.
(a) Concentration-Based Standards for
Specific Organic U andP Wastewaters.
EPA is promulgating concentretion-
based standards for those spfcrffic
constituents for which the U or P waste
is listed. For various reasons, EPA is
regulating additional constituents for
several U and P wastes.
U and P Wastewaters with
Concentration Standards Based on
Biological Treatment or Wet-Ait .
Oxidation Followed by Carbon
Adsorption
F004, P020, P022, F024, P037, P047 (4.8-
Dinitrocresol), P048, P060, P0S1P059. P060,
P077. P082. P101. Pi 23. U002. U003, U004.
uoos. uooa U012, uoia. uoia. U022. U024.
U02S. U027, U029. U03a U031. U038. U037.
U03B, U039, U043, U044, U04S. U047. U048.
U050, U051. U052. U087, U060, U061, U003.
U068. U067, U068, U070.U071. U072. U07S.
U078, U057, U078, U079, U08a U081. U082.
U083, U084. U101. U105, U10B. U10& Ulll.
. U112, U117, U118, U120, U121. U127, U128.
U129. U131. U137. U13& U140. U141. U142.
U152, U155, U157, U15& U1S9, U181. U182.
U185, U188. U169. U170, U172. U174, U179,
U180. U161. U183. U185, U187, U188. U192.
U196. U203. U207. U208. U209. U2ia U21L
U220, U22S. U22B, U227, U22& U229, U24a
(2.4-D acetic acid), U243, and U247
For these U and P wastewaters. EPA
is promulgating concentration standards
based on biological treatment, or wet air
oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption. EPA has identified sufficient
capacity for treatment of these
wastewaters; therefore, EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them.
(b)	Concentration-Based Standards
for Specific Organic U and P
Nonwastewaters. EPA is promulgating
nonwastewater concentration-based
standards for the following U and P
wastes, as proposed.
U and P Nonwastewaters with
Concentration Standards Based on
Incineration
P004, P020, P024. P037, P047, P048, POSO, P051.
P059, P060. P077, PlOl, P123, U002. U004.
UOOS, U009. U012. U01S, U019. U022, U024.
U02S. U027, U029, U03a U031, U038. U037.
UC39. U043. U044. U045. UM7. U048. UOSa
U051. U0S2, U080, U061, U063. U066, UC87.
U068, U07a U071, U072. U075, U076. U077,
U078, U079, U080, U081. U08Z. U083. U084.
U101. U105. U106, U108, Ulll, U112. U117.
U11& Uiza U121. U127, U128, U129, U131.
U137, U138. U140. U141, U142. U1S2. U1S5.
U1S7. Ul5a U1S9. U161, U162. U165. U169.
U17a U172, U174, U179, U180, U181, U183.
U18S, U187, U188, U1S2, U196, U203, U207,
U208, U209. U2ia U211. U220. U22S, U228.
U227, U228, U239, U240 (2.4-D acetic acid).
U243, and U247
For all of these specific organic U and
P nonwastewaters, EPA has identified
sufficient incineration capacity to treat
these nonwastewaters; therefore. EPA is
not granting a national capacity
' variance for them.
(c)	Technology-Based Standards for
Specific Organic U and P Wastewaters.
EPA is promulgating technology-based
treatment standards (Le« methods of
treatment) rather than concentration-
based constituent specific standards for
these wastes. EPA is promulgating wet-
air oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption or chemical oxidation
followed by carbon adsorption or
incineration as methods of treatment
Organic U and P wastes technology-
based standards are indicated below:
U and P Wastewaters With (Wet-Air
Oxidation, or Chemical Oxidation),
Followed By Carbon Adsorption; or
Incineration as Methods of Treatment
P001, P002, POOS, POOS, P007, P008. P014. POlfl.
P017. P018, P023, P028, P027, P028, P034.
P042, P045, P048, P047 (4.6-dinitrocresol
salts). P049, P054, P057, P05& P064. P066
P067. P069, P070, P072, P075, P084. P08&
P093. P09S, Pi02. Pi08, P118, P118. U0C1,
U0O6. U007, U008,U010. U011. U014. U015,
UO10. U017. U020, U021. U028. U033. U034.
U035, U041, U042, U046. L'049. U053. L'055.
U0S6. U0S9, U062, U064. U073. U074. U085.
U089, U09a U091, U092. U093, U094, U095.
U097. una U113. U114. una U119. ui2z
U123. U124. U125, U128, U130, U132. U143.
U147. U148, U149, U150, U153, U154. U156.
U163, U164. U166, U187. Uin. U173. U|78.
U177. U178, U182. U184, U189. U191. U193.
U194. U197. U200, U201. U202. U206. U213.
U218, U219. U222, U234. U238. U237. U238.
U240 (2.4-D salts and esters), U244. and
U24&
EPA has identified sufficient capacity
for these organic U and P wastewaters.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(d) Technology-Based Standards for
Specific Organic U and P
Nonwastewaters. EPA is promulgating
the proposed technology-based ~'
standards for the following organic U
and P wastes.
U and P Nonwastewaters With
Incineration as the Method of Treatment
P002, P007, P008, P014, P018, P017, P018. P022.
P023. P028, P027, P02& P034, P042. P04S.
P046, P047 (4.&-dinitrocresol salts). P049.
P054. P0S7, P05& P084, P086. P087. P069.
P07a P072, P075, P082. P084. P093. P09S,
P108. P118, P118. U003, U006, U007. uoia
U011. U014, U015, L'017, U020. U021, U028.
U033, U034, U03S, U038. U041. U042. U048.
U049. U057. U059, U082. U073, L'074. U091.
U092. U093, U095, U097, Ulia U114. U116.
Ullft Ul3a U132. U143, U148, U149, UlSa
U1S3. U156, U183, U184, U167, U168. U171.
U173. U178. U177. U178, U184, U19t. U193.
U194, U20a U202. U20& U218, U219, U222.
U234, U238, U237. U238, U240 (Salts and
esters), U244
Incineration or Fuel Substitution as
Methods of Treatment
P001, P003, POOS, P088, P102. UCOl. U008.
U018. U053, U0S5. U056. U064. U08S. U089.
U090, U094, U113, U12Z U123, U124. U12S.
U12a U147, U154, U166, U182. U188. U197.
U201. U213, U248
EPA has identified sufficient capacity
for all of these U and P nonwastewaters.
Therefore, EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
(5) Potentially Reactive P and U
Wastes. This subgroup includes the
following waste codes:
F006—Aluminum phosphide
POOS—Ammonium ptcrete
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22643
POT5—Beryllium dust
P056—Fluorine
P068—Methyl hydrazine
P073—Nickel carbonyl
P081—Nitroglycerin
P087—Osmium tetroxide
P098—Phosphine
P105—Sodium azide
PU2—Tetranitromethane
P122—Zinc phosphide
U023—Benzo trichloride
U086—N,N-Diethylhydrazine
U096—a.a-Oimethyl benzyl hydroperoxide
U098—1,1-Dimethylhydrazine
U099—1.2-Dimethylhydrazine
U103—Dimethyl sulfate
U109—1.2-Diphenylhydrazfoe
U133—Hydrazine
U134—Hydrofluoric add
U135—Hydrogen sulfide
U160—Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide
U189—Phosphorus sulfide
U249—Zinc phosphide (<10%)
These wastes either are highly
reactive or explosive or are polymers
that also tend to be highly reactive. For
the purpose of BDAT determinations,
EPA has identified four subcategories:
incinerable reactive organics and
hydrazine derivatives (POOS, P068, P081,
Pi05, P112, U023, U086, U096, U098.
U099, U103, U109, U133, and U180);
incinerable inorganics (P008, PO90, P122,
U135, U189, and U249); fluorine
compounds (P056 and U134); and
recoverable metallic compounds (P015,
P073, and P087). For incinerable reactive
organics and hydrazine derivatives, EPA
is promulgating incineration, fuel
substitution, chemical oxidation, or
chemical reduction as methods of
treatment for nonwastewaters, and
incineration, chemical oxidation,
chemicalreduction, carbon adsoiption,
or biodegradation as methods of
treatment for wastewaters. Because
EPA has determined that sufficient
treatment capacity exists for the small
volume of surface-disposed incinerable
reactive organic hydrazine derivates
(P009, P088, P081, Pi 05, P112, U023, U088,
U098, U098, U099, U103. U109, U133,
U160, and U188), EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
For all incinerablrinarganic
nonwastewaters, EPA is-promulgating
incineration, chemical oxidation, or
chemical reduction OTnftthods of
treatment For wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating incineration, chemical
oxidatioa or chemical reduction as
methods of treatment EPA has
determined that sufficient treatment
capacity exists for the small volume of
surface-disposed incinerable inorganic
wastes; therefore. EPA is not granting a
national capacity variance for them.
For fluorine compounds
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating
adsorption followed by-neutralization as
the method of treatment for P056
nonwastewaters, and neutralization or
adsorption, followed by neutralization
as methods of treatment for U134
nonwastewaters. For P056 and U134
wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
chemical precipitation. EPA believes
that adequate treatment capacity exists
for these wastes: therefore, EPA is not
granting a capacity variance for them.
In the proposed rule, EPA proposed
recovery as the method of treatment for
P015 wastes. During the comment
period, EPA received one comment
concerning P015 beryllium recovery, and
EPA verified that beryllium recovery
capacity does exist Because EPA has
determined that sufficient capacity
exists for P015 wastes, EPA is not
granting a variance for these wastes. For
P073 wastewaters, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards based on
incineration or chemical oxidation; for
P073 nonwastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based on stabilization. EPA has
determined that there is enough capacity
available to treat P073 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters; therefore, EPA is not
granting a capacity variance for them.
For P087 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters, EPA is promulgating
recovery as the method of treatment
EPA has determined that there.is not
sufficient treatment capacity for P087
wastewaters and nonwastewaters,. and
is granting these wastes a national
capacity variance.
(6)	Gases. This treatability group
includes the following groups: POTS
(Nitric oxide), P078 (Nitrogen dioxide),
and UU5 (Ethylene oxide). For P078 and
P078 wastewaters and nonwastewaters,
EPA is promulgating venting into a
reducing medium as the method of
treatment For U115, EPA is
promulgating thermal or chemical
oxidation as methods of treatment for
nonwastewaters, and incineration, or
chemical oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption, or wet-air oxidation '
followed by carbon adsorption as
methods of treatment for wastewaters.
Because no volumes of P078, P07S, and
U115 were reported as surface disposed
in the TSDR survey. EPA is not granting
a national capacity variance for them.
(7)	U and P Cyanogens. For the U and
P wastes containing cyanide. P031
(Cyanogen), P033 (Cyanogen chloride),
and U246(Cy anogen bromide), EPA is
promulgating incineration, chemical
oxidation, or wet-air oxidation as
methods of treatment for both
wastewaters and nonwastewaters. EPA
has determined that sufficient capacity
exists to treat these wastes; therefore,
EPA is not granting a national capacity
variance for them.
(8) Capacity Determination for Multi-
Source Leachate. (a) Definition and
Applicability. EPA defines multi-source
leachate as leachate that is derived from
the treatment storage, disposal, or
recycling of more than one listed
hazardous waste. Under today's final
rule, such leachate will be restricted
from land disposal Residues from
treating such leachate, as well as
residues such as soil and groundwater
that are contaminated by such leachate,
are also restricted from land disposal
under this rule. Leachate derived from a
single source must meet the standard
developed for the waste code from
which it is derived; therefore, such
leachate is not subject to the standards
developed for multi-source leachate.
(b)	Previous Treatment Standards.
EPA imposed land disposal prohibitions
on multi-source leachate in the Solvents
and Dioxins, California list and First
Third rulemakings. In the First Third
rule, multi-source leachate would have
to be treated to satisfy all the standards
applicable to the original wastes from
which the leachate is derived (see 53 FR
31146-150 (August 17,1988)). J5PA
revisited the issue of treatability of
multi-source leachate to address
concerns raised by the hazardous waste
management industry, and rescheduled
promulgation of a land disposal
restriction for multi-source leachate to
the Third Third rule in order to fully
study the most appropriate section
3004{m) treatment standards for multi-
source leachate and to reevaluate the
issue of available treatment capacity
(see 54 FR 8284 (January 27,1989)).
(c)	Final Treatment Standards. In
today's rule, EPA is promulgating one
set of wastewater and one set of
nonwastewater treatment standards for
multi-source leachate; these standards
would apply to residuals derived from
the storage, treatment or disposal of
multi-source leachate. For treating multi-
source leachate in the form of
wastewater, EPA is promulgating
concentration standards primarily based
on biological treatment followed by
chemical precipitation, or wet-air
oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption followed by chemical
precipitation for organic and inorganic
constituents. For nonwastewaters, EPA
is promulgating concentration standards
based on incineration for organic
constituents and on stabilization for
matala.
(d)	Volumes Requiring Alternative
Treatment or Recovery Capacity. EPA
relied on data from the TSDR Survey,
the Generator Survey, and other
capacity data to determine whether
sufficient alternative treatment or
-------
22544	Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
recovery capacity is available for multi-
source leachate.
Multi-source Ieachate is primarily
generated in landfills. However. EPA
recognizes that multi-source Ieachate
can also be generated at closed
facilities. Because only sparse data exist
on such Ieachate. EPA requested
comments on the characterization of
multi-source Ieachate at closed facilities
and on the volume of treated Ieachate
that is presently land-disposed in
surface disposal units. EPA also
requested the submission of current data
from interested parties on the volumes
of multi-source Ieachate generated, the
current management of such Ieachate,
the amount of residuals generated, and
the waste constituent composition of
multi-source Ieachate.
Several commenters suggested that
EPA has underestimated required
capacity for multi-source Ieachate
because Ieachate from closed landfills
and ground water from corrective
actions and CERCLA cleanups were not
considered. EPA did not obtain
adequate data to quantify the volumes
of such leachates and Ieachate
treatment residuals that might be
surface disposed. These surface-
disposed volumes, however, are not
expected to affect the national capacity
variance determination.
In addition to data from the TSDR and
Generator Surveys, EPA examined data
submitted as part of a Ieachate study
plan by four major companies managing
hazardous wastes at 17 facilities. EPA
evaluated this information to estimate
the volume of multi-source Ieachate
requiring alternative treatment
. (e) Determining National Variances.,
for Multi-Source Leachate. EPA
analyzed the alternative treatment or
recovery capacity for two categories of
multi-source leachate: wastewaters and
nonwastewaters.
Mcst multi-source leachate is
managed in wastewater treatment
systems and discharged via an NPDES
permit and/or to a POTW. EPA
estimates that over 41 million gallons of
multi-source leachate nonwastewater
residues are surface disposed.
Given the low volumes ¦^^•face-
disposed multi-source leachate
wastewaters and the adequate capacity
to treat these wastes, EPA proposed and
has decided not to grant a national
capacity variance for surface-disposed
multi-source leachate wastewaters. For
multi-source leachate nonwastewaters,
EPA is finalizing its proposal to grant a
two-year national capacity variance for
these wastes, because there is
insufficient incineration capacity.
Most commenters agreed with the
proposed variance for surface-disposed
multi-source leachate nonwastewaters.
However, a few commenters requested a
national capacity variance for surface-
disposed multi-source leachate
wastewaters. However, commenters did
not provide evidence of surface-
disposed volumes of multi-source
leachate wastewaters. EPA did not
revise the estimates of wastewater
volumes because no data were provided
showing volumes of multi-source
leachate wastewaters that are surface-
disposed. Also, as noted above, this
surface disposal must involve retrofitted
surface impoundments, under RCRA
section 3005Q), which ordinarily are
section 3005(j)(ll) impoundments.
Therefore, there should be little
additional demand for capacity for
displaced leachate wastewaters.
Commenters did not dispute this
analysis.
(9) Capacity Determination for Mixed
Radioactive Wastes, (a) Background.
EPA has defined a mixed RCRA /
radioactive waste as any matrix
containing a RCRA hazardous waste
and a radioactive waste subject to the
Atomic Energy Act (53 FR"37045,37046,
September 23,1988). Regardless of the
type of radioactive constituents that
these wastes contain (e.g., high-level,
low-level, or transuranic), they are
subject to the RCRA hazardous waste
regulations, including the land disposal
restrictions.
Radioactive wastes that are mixed
with spent solvents, dioxins, or
California list wastes are subject to the
land disposal restrictions already
promulgated for those hazardous
wastes. EPA has determined, however,
that radioactive wastes that are mixed
with First Third and Second Third
wastes will be induded in the Third
Third rulemaking (40 (311268.12(c)).
Thus, today's rule addresses radioactive
wastes that contain First Third, Second
Third, and Third Third wastes.
(b) Data Sources. The Department of
Eneigy (DOE) is a major generator of ,
mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes. For
data on DOE wastes, EPA used a data
set submitted by DOE. This data set is
based on a recent DOE survey and
contains information on mixed RCRA/
radioactive waste inventories,
generation rates, and existing and
planned treatment capacity at 21 DOB
facilities.
A variety of non-DOE facilities also
generate mixed RCRA/radioactive
wastes, including nuclear power plants,
academic and medical institutions, and
industrial facilities. A variety of
information sources were used to
identify the non-DOE generators,
estimate the quantities and types of
mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes that
they generate, and determine current
management practices and treatment
capacity. These sources included the
TSDR Survey, the Generator Survey,
and other studies. EPA believes that
these sources provide available
information on non-DOE mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes.
(c) Determining National Variances
for Mixed RCRA/Radioactive Wastes.
After investigating the data sources
noted above, EPA estimated that
approximately 393 million gallons of
radioactive waste mixed with First.
Second, and Third Third wastes will
require treatment Contaminated soil
and debris accounts for 193 million
gallons of this total. which also includes
wastes generated annually as well as
untreated wastes in storage. Although
DOE is in the process of increasing its
capacity to treat mixed RCAR/
radioactive wastes, data supplied by
DOE indicate a current capacity
shortfall for the treatment of First
Second, and Third.Third mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes. DOE indicated a
stabilization capacity of approximately
2.8 million gallons and a neutralization
capacity of approximately 400,000 '
gallons. The data, however, showed
significant alternative treatment
capacity shortfalls for all treatment
technologies, including stabilization and
neutralization. EPA's investigation of
non-DOE data sources showed a
significant lack of commercial treatment
capacity as welL Although one facility
was identified that manages a specific
type of mixed RCRA/radioactive waste,
data sources indicate a lack of sufficient
treatment capacity, for all treatment
technologies. TTius, EPA has determined
that sufficient alternative treatment
capacity is not available and is granting
a two-year national capacity variance
for mixed RCRA/radioactive waste
wastewaters and nonwastwaters.
One commenter indicated that the
proposed two-year national capacity
variance is unlawfully and
unnecessarily broad, and that EPA
should grant variances only for specific
waste streams. EPA disagrees with this
statement The capacity analysis was
based on detailed, stream-specific data
supplied by DOE as well as the best
available non-DOE data sources.
Although sufficient treatment capacity
may exist at certain facilities for certain
mixed RCRA/ radioactive wastes. EPA's
capacity analysis methodology is
designed to assess available treatment
capacity at the national level. (See
RCRA section 3004(h)(2).) EPA believes
the capacity analysis performed
demonstrates a mixed RCRA/
radioactive waste cap; city shortfall for
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday. June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22645
all alternative treatment technologies at
the national leveL
The same commenter indicated that
EPA must determine that available
treatment capacity existing for non-
radioactive RCRA hazardous waste is
inappropriate for mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes. EPA believes that
the lack of commercial mixed RCRA/
radioactive waste treatment capacity
was sufficiently demonstrated in the
proposed rule. Not only does the TSDR
Survey show a lack of permitted
treatment facilities accepting mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes, the most
recent data made available by States
and State low-level waste compacts
support the same conclusion. For the
reasons iterated here, EPA believes that
the national capacity variance for mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes is both
necessary and justified. All other
commenters addressing the national
capacity variance were in support of
EPA's proposal.
One commenter raised the question of
whether naturally-occurring radioactive
materials (NORM] containing RCRA
listed or characteristic hazardous
wastes fall under the definition of mixed
RCRA/radioactive wastes. The question
was also raised whether the national
capacity variance extends to these
materials. EPA believes that because
NORM are not regulated by the Atomic
Energy Act these materials do not fall
under the definition of mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes. EPA recognizes,
however, that insufficient alternative
treatment capacity exists to handle
these materials. Therefore, EPA Is
granting a two-year national capacity
variance to hazardous wastes mixed
with NORM.
EPA recognized that its information
for the proposed rule on mixed RCRA/
radioactive wastes generated and
managed by non-DOE facilities might
have been incomplete. Consequently,
EPA requested comments by interested
parties on the current generation of
mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes. Of
particular interest to kPa was
information on mixtures of radioactive
wastes and First Second, or Third Third
waste streams. Although several
commenters addressed problems
associated with the storage and disposal
of mixed RCRA/radioactive wastes,
only one commenter indicated that
additional data were available. Hie data
confirm the lack of available treatment
capacity and the commenter supports
the proposed national capacity variance.
Z Determination of Alternative
Capacity and Effective Dates for
Underground Injected Waste.
Today. EPA is prohibiting the
underground injection of virtually all
remaining RCRA section 3004(g) wastes,
including characteristic wastes, for
which no effective dates have been set
EPA is not acting on certain newly listed
or newly identified wastes. In the
proposed rule, EPA solicited comments
on die volumes and characteristics of
the wastes represented in this section,
aB well as any information on the
characteristics and volumes of any
multi-source leachate that is currently
being injected.
EPA received several responses to
this request One commenter submitted
data on the volume of U wastes (20,458
gallons) deepwell injected at its facility
in 1989. However, this facility has
subsequently received approval of its
no-migration petition. Another stated
that 3.3 million gallons of P and U
wastes are underground injected at its
facility. The facility has proved,
however, that this stream qualified for
the mixture rule exception under RCRA
section 281.3(a)(2)(iv), and is therefore
not considered a hazardous waste. One
commenter indicated it was injecting
7,200 tons of D004 waste at one of its
facilities. Further, one commenter stated
that it was injecting a wastewater
containing U115. Additionally, one
commenter submitted an underground
injection well survey. EPA
acknowledges these comments and has
incorporated them appropriately into the
capacity analysis.
EPA also received comments
pertaining to the form of certain wastes.
Several commenters indicated that the .
nonwastewater forms of D002, D003
(reactive cyanide), D007, and K014 were
injected and needed to be included in
the capacity analysis. EPA agrees that
nonwastewaters were not discussed for
many deepwell injected wastes and has
evaluated these waste forms for the
final rulemaking.
a. Effective Date Determinations for
Wastes with Treatment Standards in
Today's Rule
Consistent with the policy established
in previous land disposal restrictions,
EPA is restricting on August 8,1990, the
underground injection of all wastes,
with treatment standards in today's rule,
that are not currently being deepwell-
injected. This decision is consistent with
the intent of RCRA in moving hazardous
wastes away trom land disposal and
toward treatment Wastes that are not
currently being deepwell-injected are
listed in table in.B.2.fa).
The volumes of deepwell-injected
wastes that require alternative
commercial treatment and/or recycling
capacity are presented in table
nLB.2.(b). This table does not include
wastes that are currently being
deepwell-injected by facilities with
appropriate on-site alternative treatment
technologies for treating the waste.
EPA is establishing effective date
determinations for all underground
injected wastes in treatability groups. If
there is adequate available alternative
treatment capacity for all the injected
volume in a single treatability group,
then every waste in that group will be
restricted from underground injection. If
there is inadequate available alternative
treatment capacity for the injected
volume in a single treatability group,
then EPA is allocating as much of the
available capacity to the wastes
requiring treatment All remaining
wastes in the treatability group, for
which no capacity exists, will receive a
two-year national capacity variance.
EPA believes that this is most consistent
with Congressional intent which favors
both treatment over disposal and
minimal use of capacity variances. EPA
specifically solicited comments on this
approach: however no comments were
received during the public comment
period.
EPA recognizes that the effective
prohibition date of the Third Third rule
will critically affect the management of
large volumes of wastes disposed of on-
site in injection wells at a number of
facilities. On-site injection wells are
characterized by direct piping of wastes
from plant operations to the injection
facility. In contrast off-site injection
facilities receive manifested wastes
from other plant operations which are
transported directly to the injection
facility.
The injection wells at on-site facilities
are directiy connected to the plant
operations and, all totaled, handle at
least five billion gallons of hazardous
waste per year. In order to realistically
meet the treatment requirements for the
Third Third rule, the plant managers will
need time to make considerable
logistical adjustments such as repiping,
retooling, and development of
transportation networks at the plant
operation facility. Therefore, EPA does
not believe that treatment capacity is
available if there is no feasible way for
generators to transport their wastes to
the treatment facilities. EPA can
legitimately consider the time necessary
to do this in determining whether to
grant a national capacity variance.
EPA has relied on such logistic factors
in prior rulemakings to determine when
-------
22646	Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 /
Rules and Regulations
capacity 19 realistically available. EPA
notes that these same logistic factors do
not appear necessary to warrant any
extension for waste sent to off-site
commercial injection facilities as those
for on-site injection facilities. EPA
believes that facilities disposing of
wastes through off-site deepwell
injection already have these plant
adaptations and transportation
networks in place, and therefore do cot
require any extension of the effective
date. Consequently, EPA is using its
authority under section 3004(h) of RCRA
to provide a six-month extension
beyond the May 8.1990 statutory
prohibition date for all Third Third
wastes disposed of at on-site injection
facilities directly connected to plant
operations.
Table m.B.2(c] indicates the amount
of capacity available for treating
underground injected wastes, the
demand from these injected wastes on
each treatability groups, and which
treatability groups require capacity
variances. More information on EPA's
procedure for apportioning treatment
capacity in these treatability groups can
be found in the Third Third Background
Document for the treatability groups.
A number of the following treatability
groups account for relatively small (less
than 100,000 gallons/year) amounts of
underground injected wastes. EPA
believes that these small streams place
little demand on nationwide treatment
capacity.
Presented below are the treatment
technologies EPA used in the capacity -
analysis for all deepwell-injected
wastes. EPA selected these technologies
based on the BDATs used for
establishing the concentration and
technology based standards being
promulgated today. For the capacity
analysis. EPA assigned volumes of
wastes mixed with other wastes to die
appropriate treatment such that the
treatment standards for all Wastes'will
be met. Consequently, some of the
technologies listed below are treatment
trains that include the BDATuSSd to
determine the standard plus another
technology. Table ULB.2.(d) summarizes
the wastes for which EPA is granting a
two-year national capacity variance for
underground injected wastes.
Table lll.B.2.(a).—Wastes (Wit* Treat-
ment Standards) That Are Not Un-
derground Injected
[Prohibited from
Underground
1980]
Injection on August 8,
First Third Codes
K004, K008, K015 (nonwastawaters), KOI 7, K021
(wastewaters), K022 (wastewaters). K035, K036
(nonwastawaters), K037 (wastewaters),. K044,
K045, KIMS (reactive nonwastawaters and all
wastewaters), K047, K060 (wastewaters), K061
(wastewaters), K069 (CaS04 nonwastewatere
and all wastewaters). K073, K084, K085. K101
(nonwastawaters). K102 (nonwastewaters).
K106, P001, P004, P010, P012, P015, P016,
P018, P038, P037, P068, P070. P081, P082,
P084, P087, P092, P105. P108. P110. P115,
PI20, P123, U010, U016, U0I8, U02O, U022.
U029, UD36, U041, U043, U046, UOSO, U0S1,
U053, U061, U083, U064, U068, U067, U077,
U078, U088, U089, U108, U124, U129, U130,
U137, U1S5, U158, U171, U177, U160, U209,
U237, U238, U248, U249.
Second Third Codes .
K02S (Wastewaters), K028 (wastewaters), K029
(wastewaters), KM1, K042, K09S (wastewaters),
K098 (wastewaters), K098, K105, POO2, P003,
P007, PC08, P013 (wastewaters), P014, P026,
P027, P049, POM, P060, P066, P067, P07Z
P099, P104, P107, P112, P113, P114. U003,
U005, U011, U014, U01S, U021, U023, U025,
U026, U035, U047, U049, U0S7. U0S9, U060.
U082. U073, U083, U092, UC93. U094, U09S,
U097, U096, U099. U101, U109, U110, U111,
U114, U11B, in 19, U127, U128, U131, U13S,
U142, U143, U144, U146, U149, U150, U161,
U163. U164, U168, U172, U173, U174. U178,
U178, U179, U189, U193, U198, U203, U20S,
U206, U206, U213, U214, U215, U216, U217,
U218.
Third Third Codes
K003, KOOS
(wastewaters),
(wastewaters),
P024, P028.
P045. PO«,
P077, P07B,
pi 03, piie,
uo24, uoer.
U04A, U062,
1)078, U081,
U096, U117,
U132, U138,
U1SS, U156,
U164, U186,
U207, U222,
U246. U247.
(wastewaters), K006, K007
, K02S, K033, K034. K100
, POOS, P009, P017, P02Z P023,
P031, P033, P034, P03S. P042,
P047. P064, P06S, P073. P076,
P088, P093, P095, P096, P101,
Pi 18, P119, U004, U006, U017,
U030, U033, U038, U039, U042,
uosa, U071, U072, U075, U078,
(J0S2, U0S4, U085, U080, U091,
U12Q, U121. U123, U125, U128,
U139, U141, U145, U148, 0152.
U168, 111 67, U181, U182, U183,
U187. U1S1, U201, U202, U204,.
IJ22S, U234, U236, U240, U243,
Newly Usted Wastes
F02&
Table lll.B.2.(b).—Required Alterna-
tive Commercial Treatment/Recy-
cling Capacity for Underground In-
jected Wastes
[million gal ions/year]
Waste code
First Third Code
F006		
F019	
K011	
K013-
K014	
K031	
K086-
P005-.
P011	
P020	
P048	
POSO	
P058.
P059„
P069..
P102..
P122-
U007„
U009.
U012
U019
U031	
U037	
U044	
U074	
U103	
U105	
U11S	
U122	
U133-
U134-
U151._
U154_
U157„
U1S9.
U185..
U188..
U192-
U200-
U210-
U211.
U219-
U226„
U227_
U228-
Second Third Code
K097	
P057.
U002-
UOOS-
U032..
U070-
U080-
U108..
U138..
U140..
U147-
uiea_
U165-
U169-
U170..
U239..
U244-
Third TIM Code
0001	
D002	
D003-
0004..
D005..
D008..
Capacity
required tor
under-
ground
infected
wastes
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22847
Waste code
C007.
ooos.
0009.
D010.
0011.
0012.
0013-
0014.
0015.
0016.
Capably
required tor
under-
ground
iniected
201.2
33
1.2
95.2
03
2.3
U
8.4
23
23
Waste coda
0017	
FQ391
K002-
K032..
K083	
P05I	
POM	
P975..
U001-
U034..
Capacity
required tor
under-
ground
injected
2.3
15.1
0.1
<0.1
5.0
<0.1
-------
22848
Federal Register / Vol 55, No. 108 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Therefore, EPA is granting a two-year
national capacity variance to D003
(reactive cyanide) wastewaters and
nonwastewaters. This waste will be
restricted from injection on May 8,1992.
(3)	Alkaline Chlorination followed by
Chemical Precipitation. Treatment
standards based on alkaline
chlorination and chemical precipitation
are today being promulgated for F006
cyanide wastewaters and P019
wastewaters. As shown in Table
IILB.2.(c)t the available capacity of 0
million gallons is adequate to treat the
quantity of hazardous waste annually
deepwell-injected requiring this type of
treatment EPA is prohibiting these
wastes from underground injection on
August 8,1990. (For facilities with
injection wells directly connected to
plant production operations, the
effective date is November 8,1990, as
discussed at the beginning of this
section).
(4)	Biological Treatment For P020,
P048, U002, U009, U019, U031. U112.
U140. U159, U170, U188, U220. and U239,
EPA is promulgating concentration
standards based on biological treatment
for wastewaters. (EPA also determined
that the standards may be met using
wet-air oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption). Because there is adequate
biological treatment capacity for these
deepwell injected wastes, EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
them. (For facilities with injection wells
directly connected to plant production
operations, the effective date is
November 8,1990, as discussed at the
beginning of this section.)
' "(5) Chemical Oxidation followed by
Chemical Precipitation. EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
for P122 wastewaters based on chemical
oxidation. For the capacity analysis.
EPA assigned P122 wastewaters to
chemical oxidation followed by
chemical precipitation. EPA has
determined that adequate capacity
exists to treat P122 wastewaters:
therefore, EPA is not granting Pi22
wastewaters a national capacity
variance.
EPA is promulgating deactivation as
the method of treatment for D003
(sulfides), which includes chemical
oxidation. For the capacity analysis,
EPA assigned this waste to chemical
oxidation followed by chemical
precipitation. As indicated in Appendix
VI, EPA has identified other
technologies for treating these wastes.
The aggregate capacity of the additional
technologies is still insufficient for
treating these D003 wastes. Therefore,
EPA is granting a two-year national
capacity variance to D003 (sulfide)
wastewaters and nonwastewaters. This
waste will be restricted from injection
on May 8,1992.
(Q) Chemical Oxidation followed by
Chromium Reduction and Chemical
Precipitation. For D003 (explosives,
water reactives, and other reactives),
EPA is promulgating standards based on
deactivation. EPA did not have data in
sufficient detail to differentiate between
explosives, water reactives and other
reactives. Consequently, for the capacity
analysis, EPA has grouped these wastes
into one group. For the capacity
analysis, EPA assigned all volumes to
rlitmiml oxidation, chromium
reduction, and chemical precipitation.
As indicated in Appendix VI, EPA has
identified other technologies for treating
these wastes. Hie aggregate capacity of
the additional technologies is still
insufficient for treating these D003
wastes. Therefore, EPA is granting a
two-year national capacity variance to
these wastes, restricting D003
(explosives/reactives) wastewaters and
nonwastewaters from underground
injection on May 8.1992.
(7)	Chemical Precipitation.
Wastewater forms of DOM, D005, D008,
D008 (lead-non-battery), D009, D010,
DOll, F006, K031, P011, P056, U134, and
U151 represent those wastes best
treated by chemical precipitation. As
shown in table ni.E2.(c), the 331 million
gallons per year of available chemical
precipitation are adequate to treat the
quantity of hazardous waste annually
deepwell-injected requiring this type of
treatment EPA is prohibiting these
wastes from underground injection on
August 8,1990. (For facilities with
injection wells directly connected to
plant production operations, the
effective date is November 8,1990, as
discussed at the beginning of this
section).
(8)	Chromium Reduction followed by
Chemical Precipitation. Treatment
standards based on chromium reduction
and chemical precipitation are today
being promulgated for wastewater forms
of D007, F008, K002, POll. and U032. As
shown in Table IIL&2.(c). the 32 million
gallons per year capacity of available
chromium reduction and chemical
precipitation is inadequate to treat the
quantity of hazardous waste annually
deepwell-injected requiring this type of
treatment Excluding D007, however,
adequate capacity exists to treat the
remaining wastes. Therefore, EPA is
granting a two-year national capacity
variance to D007 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters. prohibiting this waste
from underground injection on May 8.
• 1992. For the remaining wastes, no
national capacity variance is being
granted.
(9)	Combustion of Liquids.
Combustion of liquids is the standard of
treatment for deepwell injected D001
(ignitable liquids), DOll, D012. D013,
DOM. D015, D016, D017. K032, K083.
K088. K097, P005, P050, P051. P057, P059.
P069, P075, P102. U001, U007, U008,
U012, U019, U034, U037, U044. U045,
U055, U058, U070, U074, U080, U103.
U105, U106, U112, U113, U115, U118,
U122, U133, U138, U147. U154, U157,
U159, U160, U162, U165, U169, U185,
U192, U194. U197, U200, U210, U211,
U219, U220, U226, U227, U228. U239, and
U244. Although U041, U077. U083, U084,
and U213 are also underground injected,
because they will be treated on-site,
their quantities are not included in
required capacity for combustion of
liquids. As shown in table QI.B.2.(c), the
219 million gallons per year of available
capacity are adequate to treat the
quantity of hazardous waste annually
deepwell-injected requiring this type of
treatment Therefore, these wastes will
be restricted from underground injection
on August 8,1990. (For facilities with
injection wells directly connected to
plant production operations, the
effective date is November 8,1990,. as
discussed at the beginning of this
section).
(10)	Mercury Retorting. Treatment
standards based on mercury retorting
are being promulgated for
nonwastewaters forms of D009 wastes.
As shown in table m.B.2.(c), the less
than .01 million gallons per year of
available mercury retorting capacity are
inadequate to treat the quantity of this
waste annually deepwell-injected
requiring this type of treatment EPA is
granting a two-year, national capacity
variance to the nonwastewater forms of
D009, restricting this waste from
underground injection on May 8,1992.
(11)	Neutralization. EPA is
promulgating deactivation as the
method of treatment for D002
wastewaters and nonwastewaters. For
the capacity analysis, EPA assigned ail
D002 adds and alkalines to
neutralization. As indicated in appendix
VI. EPA has identified other
technologies for treating these wastes.
The aggregate capacity of the additional
technologies is still insufficient for
treating D002 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters. Therefore, EPA is
granting a two-year national capacity
variance for the D002 wastewaters and
nonwastewaters, restricting this waste
from underground injection on May 8,
1992. Deepwell injected D002 liquids
with a pH less than 2.0, which received
a two-year national variance in the
California list"rulemaking, are required
-------
Federal Register / Vol. 53. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22643
to meet the California list treatment
standards on August 8,199a
(12)	Stabilization. For residuals
containing D005, DOGS, D007, DOOS [lead-
non-battery). D011. KQ02, K083. K08&,
and U032, stabilization is part of the
treatment train. As shown in Table
IILB.2.(c), the 265 million gallons per
year of available capacity are adequate
to treat the quantity of hazardous waste
residuals requiring this type of
treatment These residuals will be
prohibited from land disposal on August
8.1990. (For facilities with injection
wells directly connected to plant
production operations, the effective date
is November 8.1990, as discussed at the
beginning of this section.)
(13)	Wet-Air Oxidation. K011, K013,
and K014. represent all of the
underground injected hazardous wastes
addressed in today's rule that are best
treated by wet-air oxidation. As shown
in table HLB.2.(c), the less than 1 million
gallons of available capacity are
inadequate to treat the quantity of KOI 1
wastewaters, K013 wastewaters, and
KOI4 wastewaters and nonwastewaters
annually deepwell-infected requiring
this type of treatment. Therefore, EPA is
granting a two-year national capacity
variance to the wastewater forms of
K011, K013, and K014, and the
nonwastewater form of KOI4.
prohibiting these wastes from
underground injection on May 8.1992.
(14)	Wet-Air Oxidation followed by
Carbon Adsorption. For PQ58
wastewaters, treatment standards based
on wet-air oxidation and carbon
adsorption are being finalized today. As
shown in Table QL&2^c), the less than 1
fttillion gallons of available capacity-are
adequate to treat the quantity of P058
annually deepwell-injected required this
type of treatment therefore, EPA is not
granting a national capacity variance for
this waste. (For facilities with injection
WiUs directly connected to plant
production operations, the effective date
is November 8,1990, as discussed at the
beginning of this section.)
(15} Biological Treatment followed by
Chemical Precipitation or Wet Air
Oxidation followed by Carbon
Adsorption followed byiCft6mical
Precipitation. For F039 (multi-source
leachate) wastewaters, EPA is
promulgating concentration standards
based primarily on biological treatment
followed by chemical precipitation or
wet air oxidation fallowed by carbon
adsorption followed by chemical
precipitation. As shown in table
m.B.2.(c). the approximately 14 million
gallons of available capacity is
insufficient to handle the IS million
gallons of required capacity. EPA notes
that the 14 million gallons of available
capacity is the mnriymim available, as a
portion of this volume is contributed by
a facility that was scheduled to come
on-line in 1688. EPA was unable to
determine whether this facility is
currently operating. Because of the lack
of available capacity, EPA is granting a
national capacity for this waste.
b.	Response to Request for Data on
Underground Injected K014
Nonwastewaters.
EPA addressed the underground
injection of K011 and K013
nonwastewaters in the June 8,1989,
Second Third final rule. In that rule, a
two-year national capacity variance
was granted due to the lack of
alternative incineration capacity (>4 FR
26642). Action on K014 nonwastewaters
was deferred so that EPA could evaluate
information on the composition,
characteristics, and volumes associated
with this waste. EPA has received
information indicating that by
definition, K014 nonwastewaters are
being underground injected. Because
inadequate wet-air oxidation capacity
exists to treat K014 nonwastewaters,
EPA is granting a two-year national
capacity variance for the underground
injection of these wastes, restricting
K014 nonwastewaters from underground
injection on May 8,1982.
c.	Deepwell Injected Multi-Source
Leachate.
Commenters supported the proposed
capacity variance for underground
injected multi-source leachate. One
commenter provided data or additional
volumes of multi-source leachate that
are underground injected. Consequently,
EPA is updating its estimate of the
volume of underground injected multi-
source leachate by 1.5 million gallons.
EPA estimates that at least IS million
gallons of multi-source leachate
wastewaters are currently deep-well
injected and will require alternative
treatment capacity. EPA believes that
most multi-source leachate currently
underground injected contains both
organic and inorganic constituents. EPA
is promulgating concentration standards
for wastewaters primarily based on
biological treatment followed by
chemical precipitation, or wet-air
oxidation followed by carbon
adsorption followed by chemical
precipitation for organic and inorganic
constituents. Because there is
insufficient capacity to treat
wastewaters based on these treatment
technologies, EPA is granting a two-year
national capacity variance for mnlti-
source leachate that is underground
injected. This waste win be prohibited
from underground injection on May 8.
1962.	7
A Mixed Radioactive Wastes.
EPA requires radioactive wastes
mixed with RCRA-regulated solvents
and dioxins to meet LDRs and treatment
standards established for those solvents
and dioxins when mixed with
radioactive wastes. EPA currently has
no information on mixed radioactive
wastes that are underground injected.
EPA requested comments on mixed
radioactive wastes that are being
underground injected. EPA received no
information indicating that mixed
radioactive wastes were bein'g
underground injected; thus. EPA is cot
granting a national capacity variance for
them. These wastes will be prohibited
from underground injection on August 8,
1990.
3. Capacity Variances for Contcrr.ircted
Soil and Debris
Today, EPA is granting an extension
of the effective date for certain First
Second, and Third Third contaminated
soil and debris for which the treatment
standards are based on incineration,
vitrification, or mercury retorting; EPA is
also granting a national capacity
variance for inorganic solids debris
contaminated with D004 through DOll
wastes. RCRA section 3005(h)(2) allows
the Administrator to grant an extension
to the effective date based on the
earliest date on which adequate
alternative capacity will be available,
but not to exceed two years ". . . after
the effective date of the prohibition
which would otherwise apply under
subsection (d), (e), (f), or fg)." For First
third and Second Third wastes that have
heretofore been subject to the "soft
hammer" provisions (see section I.B&)
but for which treatment standards are
being promulgated today, EPA is
interpreting the statutory language "
* * * effective date of the prohibition
that would otherwise apply" to be the
date treatment standards are
promulgated for these wastes (i.e.. May
8,1990), rather than the date on which
the "soft hammer" provisions took effect
(i.e., August 8,1988, and June 8,1383,
respectively). EPA finds this the best
interpretation for two reasons.
Extensions of the effective date are
based on the available capacity of the
BDAT for the waste, so it is reasonable
that such an extension begin on the date
on which treatment standards based on
performance of the BDAT are
established. Furthermore, EPA does not
intend, in effect to penalize generators
of First Third and Second Third wastes
by allowing less time (i.e., 28 months
and 37 months, respectively) for the
development of needed capacity, while
-------
22650
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 108 / Friday. June 1. 1690 / Rules and Regulations
generators of Third Third wastes in the
same treatability group are allowed the
maximum 48 months (assuming capacity
does not become available at an earlier
date). The capacity extension will
therefore commence for First Second,
and Third Third wastes on May 8,1990,
and would extend (at maximum) until
May 8. 1992.
For the purpose of determining
whether a contaminated material is
subject to this capacity extension, "soil"
is defined as materials that are primarily
geologic in origin, such as silt loam, or
clay, and that are indigenous to the
natural geological environment In
certain cases, soils will be mixed with
liquids or sludges. EPA will determine
on a case-by-case basis whether all or
portions of such mixtures should be
considered soil (52 FR 31197, November
8,1986).
Debris is generally defined as
materials that are primarily non-geologic
in origin, such as grass, trees, stumps,
shrubs, and man-made materials (e.g~
concrete, clothing, partially buried
whole or crushed empty drums,
capacitors, and other synthetic
manufactured items). Debris may also
include geologic materials (1) identified
as not indigenous to the natural
environment at or near the site, or (2)
identified as indigenous rocks exceeding
a 9.5-mm sieve size that are greater than
10 percent by weight or that are at a
total level that based on engineering
judgment will affect the performance of
available treatment technologies. In
many cases, debris will be mixed with
liquids or sludges. EPA will determine,
on a case-by-case basis whether all or
portions of such mixtures should be
considered debris.
In addition. EPA has established a
specific treatability group for inorganic
solids debriB contaminated with D004
through D011 wastes. Wastes in this
treatability group are defined as follows:
nonfriable inorganic solids that are
incapable of passing through a ftSnnm
standard sieve that requite cashing,
grinding, or cutting in mechanical sizing
equipment prior to stabilisation, limited
to the following inorganic or metal
materials: (1) Metal slags (either dross
or scoria); (2) glassified slag; (3) glass;
(4) concrete (excluding cementitious er
pozzolanic stabilized hazardous
wastes); (5) masonry and refractory
bricks; (8) metal cans, containers,
drums, or tanks; (7) metal nuts, bolts,
pipes, pumps, valves, appliances, or
industrial equipment; ami (8} "scrap
metal" (as defined in 40 CFR 281.1(c)(8))..
EPA has determined that there is
inadequate treatment capacity for all
debris in this treatability group.
Therefore, EPA is granting inorganic
solids debris a national capacity
variance.
Analysis of the TSDR Survey data
indicated that a volume of
approximately 17 million gallons of soil
and debris contaminated with wastes
subject to this rule were land-disposed
in 1986. However, the Superfund
remediation program has expanded
significandy since that time. Plans for
remediation at Superfund sites Indicate
that the excavation of soil and debris
requiring treatment (including
incineration and subsequent land
disposal) will be far greater in 1990 than
in 1988. Because of the major increase in
the Superfund remediation program.
EPA has determined that capacity is not
adequate for incineration, vitrification,
and mercury retorting of Third Third
contaminated soil and debris. In
addition. EPA has determined that there
is insufficient treatment for inorganic
solids debris. Therefore, EPA is granting .
a two-year national capacity variance
for Third Third contaminated soil and
debris for which BDAT is incineration,
vitrification, or mercury retorting, and
all inorganic solids debris.
EPA is also granting a two-year
national capacity variance to all soil
and debris contaminated with mixed
RCRA/radioactive waste. EPA has
estimated that insufficient treatment
capacity exists to handle soil and debris
contaminated with mixed radioactive
waste.
EPA notes that if soil and debris are
contaminated with Third Third
prohibited wastes whose treatment
standard is based on incineration (or
other .technologies for which EPA
determines there is insufficient capacity)
and also with other prohibited wastes . ,
whose treatment standard is based on
an available type of technology, the soil
and debris would remain eligible for the
national capacity variance. This is
because th» contaminated soil and
debris, would still have to be treated by
some form of technology that EPA has
evaluated as being unavailable at
present However, there is one
exception to this principle. If die soil
and debris are contaminated with a
prohibited waste (or wastes) that is no
longer eligible for a national capacity
extension, such as certain types of
prohibited solvent wastes, then the soil
and debris would have to be treated to
meet the treatment standard for that
prohibited waste (or wastes). Any other
interpretation would result in EPA's
extending the date of a prohibition
beyond the dates established by
Congress, and therefore beyond EPA's
legal authority.
C. Ninety Day Capacity Variance for
Third Third Wastes
EPA is delaying the effective date of
the treatment standards in today's rule
for three months, or until August 8,1990
[except for those portions of the rule
delayed because of long-term national
capacity variances). EPA is taking this
step because the Third Third rule is of
unusual breadth (approximately 350
waste codes affected, plus all
characteristic wastes, multi-source
leachate, and mixed wastes),
complexity, and difficulty. Persons
having to comply must not only
determine what the treatment standards
are for their wastes, but must also
grapple with the interplay between
standards for listed and characteristic
wastes, certain new interpretations
regarding permissible and impermissible
dilution, and certain new tracking
requirements for characteristic wastes.
Although the Agency has made all
efforts legally available to communicate
its resolution of some of these matters in
advance of the May 8,1990, prohibition
date, most members of the regulated
community are just receiving notice of
the requirements with which they must
comply. It takes some reasonable
amount of time to determine what
compliance entails, as well as time to
redesign tracking documents, possibly
adjust facility operations, and possibly
segregate wastestreams which
heretofore had been centrally treated.
EPA believes that these legitimate
delays are encompassable within the
concept of a short-term national
capacity variance because part of the
notion of available capacity is the
ability, to get wastes to the treatment
capacity in a lawful manner.
Accordingly, the Agency is granting a
short-term national capacity variance
for three months.
The Agency emphasizes that during
this variance, all Third Third wastes,
that remain hazardous and that are
being disposed of in landfills or surface
impoundments may only be disposed of
in landfill or impoundment units that
meet the minimum technology standards
set out in S 288J3(h)(2). (See also section
m.D of today's preamble explaining that
a different principle holds for prohibited
wastes that are now nonhazardous.) In
addition, the recordkeeping
requirements of existing 40 CFR 268.7
(a)(4) and (b)(6) will apply during this
period. These provisions require a
certification that a restricted waste is
not subject to a prohibition for
enumerated reasons, such as existence
of a national capacity variance. EPA
does not intend, however, that
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22651
recordkeeping requirements apply to
characteristic wastes that have been,
treated to meet the treatment standard
daring this three-month period. The new
recordkeeping requirements applicable
to these situations in fact do not take
effect for three months based on the
Agency's determination that it will take
that long to understand how to use
them. Thus, tracking documents would
only be required for restricted wastes
that are hazardous wastes when sent •
'off-site. In addition, all existing
treatment requirements (e£* California
list requirements applicable during the
period of a capacity extension) are
applicable from May 8,1990 to August 8,
199a
D. Applicability of Land Disposal
Restrictions
1. introduction
Under RCRA, wastes can be
designated as "hazardous" in one of two
ways: (1) they may be specifically listed
based on EPA's evaluation of factors set
out in 40 CFR 261 subpart B ("listed
wastes"), or (2) they may be considered
.hazardous because they exhibit certain
indicator characteristics set out in 40
CFR part 281 subpart C ("characteristic
wastes").
A central issue in this rulemaking
concerns EPA statutory authority to
require full treatment for characteristic
wastes. Some industry commenters
argue that EPA lacks Jurisdiction over
characteristic wastes if the indicator
characteristic is removed before land
disposal. Environmentalists and the
treatment industry, on the other hand,
- argue thatEPA must in. all cases,..
require treatment of characteristic
wastes in the same	it would for
listed wastes. EPA disagrees with both
positions. Rather, EPA believes that the
statute provides EPA ample authority to
determine whether additional treatment
beyond removal of the characteristic is
necessary for particular types of wastes
to achieve the goals of the. statute.
In some cases, EPA is requiring
additional treatment beyond removing
the characteristic; in others, EPA deems
removal of the characteristic itself to be
sufficient especially where no toxic "
contaminants are specifically identified:
. finally, in several cases, EPA has
determined that there is only sufficient
information in the record to Justify -
treatment requirements to the
characteristic levels at this time. For .
theserespective wastes, data in the
administrative record is not adequate to
determine whether treatment below
characteristic levels is feasible to
minimize threats to human health and .
the environment for the wide range of
differing waste matrices encompassed
by a single characteristic waste code. In
these respective cases, EPA is
establishing a treatment level based on
its best Judgment on the information
currently available, and will review its
decision in light of new information in
tha future.
Another critical issue is whether or
not to prohibit dilution of characteristic
wastes as part of die IDR program. As
discussed below, to some circumstances ¦
a dilution prohibition is important to.
ensure actual treatment of the waste.
EPA is applying a dilution prohibition to
wastes which exhibit a characteristic at.
the point of generation, with two
exceptions.He first exception to the
dilution prohibition is for characteristic
wastes treated for purposes of CWA
requirements. CWArequirements,
including CWA dilution rules, serve
goals similar to die LOR dilution rules.
Relying on the CWA dilution rules will
generally accomplish the goals of the
LDR program without creating potential
inconsistencies or duplication in EPA's
regulations. A second general exception
to the LDR prohibitions is for
characteristic wastes that are
subsequently diluted and disposed in
injection wells authorized under the
SDWA. This exclusion is based, in part,
on EPA's evaluation that the disposal of
dilute^ unhazardous wastes into
appropriately confined Injection zones
would not constitute a threat to human
health and the environment EPA's
decision also is based on the
unnecessary regulatory burden that
would ensue from application of the .
LDR prohibitions on the SDWA program
regulating nonhazardous well disposaL
A more detailed discussion of EPA's
rationale and decision rules follow.
2. Legal Authority over Characteristic
Wastes
a. Introduction. One of the most
fundamental issues in this rulemaking is
whether the prohibition on the land
disposal of untreated characteristic
wastes applies at the point of generation
or at die point of land disposaL The
choice of approach will affect EPA's
ability to establish methods of treatment
(rather than allowing dilution to meet a
level), to apply a dilution prohibition, to
require treatment of constituents other
than those specifically addressed by the
characteristic, and to establish
treatment levels below characteristic
levels.
This issue arises from current
regulatory distinctions between
characteristic hazardous wastes and
listed hazardous wastes. Listed wastes,
and wastes derived from the storage,
treatment and disposal of listed wastes.
remain hazardous for all regulatory
purposes unless that waste is
spetifically delisted by Agency approval
of a delisting petition under 40 CFR
260.22. Thus, a listed hazardous waste
remains hazardous from the point of
generation through the point of land
disposal unless specifically delisted.
In contrast a characteristic hazardous
waste is no longer deemed hazardous
when it ceases to exhibit a hazardous
waste characteristic. 40 CFR 261.3(d)(1).
However, as discussed below, the
characteristic level is only one indicator
of hazard and, thus, removal of the
specific characteristic is not the same as
assuring that the waste is safe. Until
today, a hazardous waste characteristic
could be removed by treatment;
however, it could also be removed by
simple mixing or dilution. Thus, if LDR
requirements were applied only to
wastes which exhibit a characteristic at
the point of land disposaL EPA would be
unable to require full treatment or, in
some cases, any legitimate treatment of
wastes which exhibit a characteristic at
the point of generation.
EPA's proposed approach for both
treatment standards and applying a
dilution prohibition for characteristic
wastes received many comments. Most
commenters expressed concern about
the regulatory impact of these rules on
land disposal facilities regulated under
RCRA subtide D. There was particular
concern over the impact of the proposed
rules on existing wastewater treatment
trains regulated under the Pre treatment
and National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) programs,
pursuant to sections 307(b) and 402 of
the CWA, which use surface
impoundments not regulated under
RCRA subtide C. In addition, there were
many comments concerning the impact
of the proposed rules on the SDWA
program for nonhazardous injection
wells.
As discussed below, Congress has
. given apparendy conflicting guidance on
how the Agency should address land
disposal prohibitions for characteristic
wates. EPA believes it has authority to
reconcile these potential conflicts and to
harmonize statutory provisions to forge
a coherent regulatory system. (See
RCRA Section 1006(b)—"The
Administrator shall integrate all
provisions of (RCRA) for the purposes of
administration and enforcement and
shall avoid duplication to the mnvtmnm
extent practicable, with the appropriate
provisions of the (CWA and SDWA)".)
Within this authority EPA seeks to
further the policy of section <3004(m) to
treat hazardous waste prior to land
disposaL However, EPA may also take
-------
99*S9 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 108 / Friday. June t 1990 / Rules and Regulations
steps to address problems that could
arise from integration of LDR
prohibitions ia the context of the RCRA
Subtitle D. CWA and SDWA programs.
A more detailed discission of the legal
authority for this approach is provided
below.
. b. General Standard for Agency
Construction of Statutes. Chevron
UiLA. inc. T. NRDC, 467ILS. 837 (1884)
sets forth a two-step process for
determining whether to sustain an
agency's statutory interpretations. First
a court determines whether Congress
Hub spoken dlfprfly to precise
question at <»«'<»- If the 
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations 22653
waste prohibitions. Section 3004(d)(1)(C)
(emphasis added). Urns, EPA believes it
has statutory authority to take into
account all aspects of a waste stream in
determining appropriate treatment and
is not limited to considering merely one
specific "characteristic" that indicates
that die waste is hazardous in the first
hirtaniw.
EPA also has general authority under
RCRA section 3004 (a)(3) to establish
different criteria for determining when
wastes will enter and exit the hazardous
waste management system—La, when
they will initially be dtHjinfad as
hazardous waste end when they no
longer require RCRA subtitle C
management controls. For example, the
dean-closure standards for regulated
units diet hold characteristic wastes
require removal.of baz&riswfc—'			
- ^CEtftfcrfients even if the waste no longer
exhibits a hazardous characteristic. See
53 FR 8705 (March 19,1987). EPA also
has previously promulgated regulations
requiring that incinerators treating
hazardous waste be operated to a
certain efficiency even if a characteristic
waste in die waste feed ceases to
exhibit a characteristic somewhere in
the combustion process.
EPA believes that under the first test
in Chevron, Congress has neither
-mandfitedaorprepluded a poMot.		
generation approach. In this case the
"meaning or reach of a statute involve[s]
reconciling conflicting-policies."
Chevron, 467 U.S. at S46 (citation
omitted). Moreover, "a full
' understanding of the force of the.
statutory policy in the given situation
¦ has depended upon more than ordinary
knowledge respecting die subject
' matters subjected to agency
regulations." Id. Accordingly, EPA'
should make choices which represent "a
reasonable accommodation of
conflicting policies that were committed
to the agency's care by statute." Id.
In this regard, section 1006(b) of
RCRA provides EPA authority to
integrate provisions of RCRA and other
acts it administers, including the CWA
and SDWA, for purposes of
administration and enforcement Such
intonation must be consistent with die -
goals and policies of these acts. Under
this framework, EPA can analyze
potential overlaps between regulatory
programs in its decision-making. Where
the goals are consistent and uniform
administration or enforcement is
preferable, EPA may rely on one
regulatory framework instead of
applying potentially duplicative or
inconsistent regulations. Accordingly,
the Agency believes that it can .
harmonize potentially conflicting
policies by considering both the benefits
of a given approach and any regulatory
problems (including regulatory overlap)
that would be engendered by the
approach. The balancing may thus result
in different application of LDR .
requirements for certain classes of
facilities.
d. Agency Framework far Addressing
Treatment Standards for Characteristic
Wastes and Integrating (hem With
Other Regulatory Programs. The Agency
believes that it has authority to apply
LDR requirements at die point of waste
generation for characteristic wastes and
that such an approach will generally
better achieve the goals of the LDR
program. Specifically, EPA. believes it
has the authority ta g&tantaaaft fords
JD^rowf&e characteristic levels, to
specify methods of treatment and to
prohibit dilution for characteristic
wastes where necessary and
appropriate to further the goals of .the
statute. EPA recognizes, however, that
there are many far-reaching policy
considerations respecting the actnal
Implementation of this approach; For
example, a point of generation approach
could apply to management of waste
prior to RCRA subtitle D land disposal.*
LDR standards which require waste to
be treated to belotiTcharacteristic levels
would apply to wastes currently
destined for RCRA subtitle D facilities.
Application of the LDR provisions
would be a very significant change in
the regulatory scheme for these
facilities, and could cause major
administration and enforcement
problems far both EPA and these
facilities. For example. EPA currently
has no authority to enforce subtitle D
criteria against subtitle D facilities, and,
hence has no enforcement program for
these facilities. In order to ensure that
these facilities met the subtide C
requirements, the Agency would have to
implement an enforcement scheme that
addressed thousands of subtitle D
facilities. In addition, owners end
operators of subtide D facilities would
need to meet complex LDR tracking
requirements. Many may decide not to
accept partially treated characteristic
wastes rather than comply, thus,
diverting potentially large volumes of
non-hazardous waste to subtide C
facilities and potentially aggravating
capacity problems at subtide C
* Waita disposed into rcch units would used to
meet the treatment requirement* unless disposal Is
(1) into a "no migration" milt approved under 40
CFR part 148 cr 28& or (2) Into • surface
impoundment which meets the requirements of
RCRA taction 30080H11).
facilities.® As noted in the proposal at 54
FR 48491. some of these problems may
be addressed by future regulatory
revisions. EPA will continue to evaluate
this issue as it addresses standards for
the wastes identified by the new
Toxicity Characteristic (TC).
In addition, many of these potentially
affected subtitle D units contain wastes
that are regulated, in part, under the
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) and
pre treatment programs under sections
301,304,307, and 402 of the CWA and
the Underground Injection Control (UIC)
program under the SDWA. Requiring
treatment below characteristic levels or
imposing a dilution prohibition would
reqpin dgziSfiiant changes to the
operations of these facilities and create
problems of regulatory integration.
This is not to say that the section
3004(m) objectives carry little weight
with respect to characteristic wastes.
On die contrary, particularly with
respect to toxic wastes, these policies
are of critical importance. Moreover,
many of these potential
implementational problems may be
addressed by future rulemakings.
Section 1006(b) of RCRA requires the
Agency to integrate "for the purposes of
administration and enforcement" RCRA
subtitle C with the goals and policies of
other portions of RCRA, as well as other
statutes administered by EPA. In light of
this requirement and the absence of any
clear Congressional directive to apply
LDR requirements directly to subtitle D
facilities, the Agency must ask itself
whether the benefits of treating below
characteristic levels warrant the serious
implementation problems such as those
discussed above. This is particularly
true where the administrative record
contains inadequate data to set levels
below the characteristic level for the
many waste matrices represented by a
single characteristic waste code.
However, where the data is adequate,
- EPA believes it can successfully
implement treatment requirements
beyond removal of the characteristic, on
a case-by-case basis, without significant
disruptions to other regulatory programs
to further the goals of section 3004(m) by
requiring treatment beyond removal of
the characteristic. EPA is prepared to
reevaluate these issues in future
rulemakings based on further
information and experience with
implementing the LDR program.
The extent to which the treatment
goals of section 3004(m) are furthered by
• As noted below, EPA has provided a regulatory
structure to enforce, dilution rales which does not
Impact subtitle D faculties.
-------
Federal	/ VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Roles and Regulations
treatment beyond removal of the
specific characteristic and by
application of LDR dilution rules is
discussed below for certain classes of
wastes and certain classes of waste
management practices. EPA also will
consider section3004(g) and the
1000(b) of RCRA to integrate regulatory
programs. Accordingly, EPA's approach
is to balance both the extent oi
additional treatment provided from
treatment beyond removal of a
characteristic and regulatory integration.
concerns for LDR standards relating to
" characteristic wastes.10
Below; EPA addresses three separate
LPR wqaii i mm nt ^treatment levels,
methods of treatment, acdi&"a&A2 ..
prohibitions. In addition, EPA discusses
exclusions for some at tcese
requirements for certain practices
regulated under die CWA and SDWA-
3. Treatment Levels
a Knvimnmantnl rinnaiilarntlnna S
Section 3004(m] states that treatment
standards should substantially diminish
the toxicity or mobility and minimize
short-term and long-term threats. The
legislative history of this provision also
states that regulation under RCRA
should complement and reciprocally re-
enforce regulations under the CWA. S.
Rept at 16. EPA's framework for
developing best demonstrated available
technologies helps to ensure that
toxicity and mobility are minimized.
Additionally, die methods or levels
derived through the BDAT process also
minimize short and long-term threats to
human health and the environment -
Thus, In establishing BDAT, EPA seeks
to achieve substantial reductions in
toxicity and mobility, not merely
incidental or small reductions. Available
data and objectives of the land disposal
In detennlning tbat soma balancing of
competing section 300t(m) aiitM006(b)y3004{g}
Interests is necessary tn establishing prohfizitians
for characteristic waste*, the Ajjmcy to farther
ilul—mlfifaia that riw fcwwMml witfiiwl fa riw
CMft opinion \aVWTCm. 888P. 2d 35S (OC Or.
1989) and the Agency's response to that opinion (53
PR WHO {Feb. 28,1990}) U not (fiapuilOvB ta the
iliffmhig context of chmacteHstlc wastaa. Both the
opinion and &a Agency's napoaaa dealt with
•ttnattona when listed bandana wastes -mat
being disposed so tliafe were no competing interests
to balanca against Iha Section 30M(m) mandate.
Consequently, the Agency determined that tartB It
could develop * mznnrni concentration leveii
which establish when threats fan prohibited
wastes are minimized, it would opt for the certainty
of technology-based treatment standards to remove
miwgMTMflWiiwiniiiiy —wftnaxt wm fei
disposal of fcaordnawastea. 38 FB at ABU.
Characteristic wastes present a different situation,..
huwawet, doe to the potential disruption of other
to treatmeqt below the diaracteristlc levels in soma
restrictions program are both relevant
for determining the appropriate level of .
minimization in individaal cases.
Treatment to a characteristic level will
result in a substantial (eduction in die
toxicity or mobility of the characteristic
waste	EPA has evaluated in
this rulemaking. For example, EPA's
stabilization data for arsenic
demonstrated untreated EP toxicity from
41 to 6450 mg/L Treatment of these
wastes to the characteristic level of 5
mg/1 results in a reduction of 88 to
99.9%. The Agency also believes that
further treatment may, in some cases,
continue u> minimize threats to 1""""
health and the environment However,
for other waste treatability groups
At lj^rrtf*	gPA
believes it only has sufficient St- —
this time, to establish treatment levels at
the characteristic leveL See section in A
above.
. This section sets forth EPA's approach
for developing treatment standards for -
each category of characteristic-wastes.
The Agency based its decisions on the
data available at the time of this
rulemaking. See RCRA section
3004(d)(1). EPA plans to re-examine
these standards as new information
becomes available. In addition, EPA will
develop additional standards for the
newly-identified wastes in theloxidty
characteristic rule.
Today's rale reflects a decision to
take limited, but nonetheless significant
steps within the point of generation
framework. As * general matter, the
Agency believes that the goals of
section 3004(m) may require application
of standards which go beyond die
characteristic level (subject to
harmonization with section 3004(g)
policies) in some future cases. EPA
intends in the rulemaking for TC wastes
to evaluate more stringent treatment
levels for more treatability groups. This
would potentially require lower levels
for characteristic constituents and
treatment of other hazardous
constituents in a given characteristic
waste matrix. Tin phased approach in
today's ride is consistent with die
principle that an agency is entided to
the highest deference in deciding die
sequence and grouping in which it
addresses issues. Hazardous Waste
Treatment Council v. EPA, 881 F2d 277,
287 (D.C. Or. 1988) (upholding EPA's
construction of HSWA statutory
provisions in a way that allowed the
Agency to take one step at a time in
implementing the provisions under
HSWA]; Associated Gas Distributors v.
FERC, 824 F. 2d 981,1039 (HC (3c.
1987).
(1)	Taxic Wastewaters. EP toxic
inorganic wastewaters are primarily
destined for NPDES wastewater -
treatment systems, pre treatment
systems and UIC injection wells. Given
current data EPA could set treatment
levels about an order of magnitude
below die characteristic levels for some
of die EP toxic metal wastewaters.
Imposing treatment standards below the
characteristic level, however, could
have the effect of invalidating legitimate
methods of treatment involving surface
impoundments that are part of CWA
wastewater treatment trains
(equalization basins used to equalize
flows to centralized chemical
precipitation and sedimentation
treatment for example). A treatment
standard below characteristic levels
wouiif neetf jnet prior to placement
in a subtide D treatment impbuhaifo3?&- -
This would be so even though the
fanpoimdment might treat the waste for
purposes of CWA requirements. In
effect this could move BAT/PSES
standards from end-of-pipe to in-
process, requiring facilities to change
their existing wastewater treatment
systems or comply with internal waste
stream requirements that would overlap
with CWA requirements. Imposing such
standards on Class I non-hazardous UIC
disposal coujdinterferewith.protective
disposal practices with no
corresponding environmental benefit
(see discussion on dilution below).
As a result EPA is not imposing
treatment standards below
characteristic levels for such
wastewaters. Based on the information
in die rulemaking record virtually all
wastewaters are managed in the context
of CWA treatment impoundments or
UIC wells.11
(2)	Taxic nonwastewaters. With
respect to nonwastewaters exhibiting
the EP characteristic for metals, EPA
determined that BDAT is based on
vitrification of stabilization. These
technologies are matrix-dependent types
of treatment When considering
characteristic wastes, the amount of
diversity within a single waste code is
typically extensive. TUs is because,
unlike listed wastes, the characteristics
do not identify wastes from single
processes, single industries, or single
chemical species, but rather can come
from virtually any process or industry.
u If EPA should receive information in the future
indicating that signfflcant volumes of wastewater is
land disposed tn another context EPA will
reevaluate the issae of setting treatment levels
lower than the characteristic level for EP todc
metals Again EPA is ntflUng its considerable
diaoetfam to addrea* issues one at a time. See
HWTCm supra. 881F. 2d at ZBT.
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, Ne. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1890 / Rules, and Regulations	22655
Using available data, it is not possible in
this rulemaking, due to lack of time and
data on this diverse universe, to
subcategorize each characteristic waste
into treatability groups designed
specifically for certain industries or
processes. Thus, in considering what
treatment standards are achievable for
EP toxic metal nonwaste waters, die
Agency had to develop uniform
standards based on BDAT technology
that constitute all or most of the wastes
identified by the characteristic.
As discussed in section IDA. of the
preamble, the Agency is confident that
these wastes can be treated at least to
characteristiclevels. However, the
Agency is unable to treatment standards
below the' characteristic level are
achievable for all of such wastes.
Certainly, as shown by data submitted
by the waste treatment industry and
other commenters, some samples in
these waste categories can be treated to
levels below the characteristic, and
some to levels well below (an order of
magnitude or more, in some cases). The
Agency does not believe that these data
are sufficiently representative, however,
to warrant extrapolation to all waste
matrices under a given waste code.1*
See discussion in section IDA.
In reviewing the additional data
submitted by commenters, the Agency
was struck by the amount of diversity
. often present in the treatment data for a
particular characteristic, not only
confinning the-matrix-dependent nature
of the technology, but the difficulty of
finding a single numerical standard that
~~ would be~genera]ly achievable for all
wastes in that particular metal waBte
code. Another problem confirmed by
data is that many wastes exhibit
characteristics for more than one metal
and optimized treatment for one metal
can preclude optimized treatment for
another. Yet virtually all of the metal
treatability data in this record is for
treating only one metaL
Even if the Agency had enough data
to require treatment below the
characteristic levels for these wastes, it
would likely have to establish specific
treatability groups within die individual
codes (as done today to a limited
extent). Many of the difficulties in
assessing data noted briefly above, and
discussed in detail in the sections on
each characteristic metal, appear to be
industry or process specific. It should be
noted that the Agency expects that
treatment will result in levels slightly
"The treatment isdnstry data, fur example, was
often deficient in sscb infoimatioa as to whether -
and how concentrated characteristic wastes are
and back	for	flffarti
resulting from pretreatment mixing. Sm section IDA.
below the characteristic levels in any
case. This is because most treatment
technologies cannot easily be "turned
off" at precisely the characteristic level
and, thus, EPA believes the requirement
to treat to the characteristic level will
often result in further treatment
- For EP toxic pesticide
nonwastewatere, treatment is based on
a non-matrix dependent technology that
can reduce hazardous constituent levels
to orders of magnitude below the
characteristic leveL Thus, the types of
difficulties posed for EP metals-
assessing treatment achievability for a
wide variety of wastes treated by a
matrix-dependent technology—are not
presented for pesticide wastes.
Moreover, the pesticide wastes are
potent carcinogens, so that removing the
uncertainties of the threats they pose
when land disposed is highly desirable.
The Agency, thus, is establishing
treatment standards for these wastes
based on performance of optimized
destruction technology. EPA does not
believe the general regulatory
difficulties in implementing
requirement to treat below
characteristic levels are significant in
the context of subtitle D facilities as
there is a limited amount of this waste
in existence and the destruction of the
toxic constituents is a clear benefit over
other treatment approaches..
(3) Other Characteristic wastes. As
discussed in section IDA* for most
corrosive, reactive, and igni table
characteristic wastes, the Agency has
determined that the appropriate
treatment for these wastes is to remove
the characteristic. The environmental
concerns from the properties of
ignitability, corrosivity, and reactivity
are different from the environmental
concern from EP toxic wastes. Toxic
constituents can pose a cumulative
impact on land disposal even where
waste is below the characteristic level
Where wastes pose an ascertainable
toxicity concern, afe with high TOC
igni table wastes, and cyanide-bearing
and sulfide-bearing reactive wastes, the
Agency has developed treatment
standards that address the toxicity
concern and (in effect) require treatment
below the characteristic level As
discussed in section ISA* this-epproach
is important to address toxic
constituents in this waste. EPA does not
believe the regulatory problems in
implementing standards for this limited
number of streams will be significant
Otherwise, treatment that removes the
properties of ignitability. corrosivity,
and reactivity, fully addresses the
environmental concern from die
properties themselves. Further
discussion is contained in the preamble
dealing with each specific characteristic.
b. Regulatory Problems. In reaching
the approach set forth in today's rule,
EPA has considered the advantages of
additional treatment with the
difficulties in (1) implementing a
requirement to treat below
characteristic levels and (2) the effect of
such a rule on overlapping federal
environmental programs.
The characteristic leviel evaluated at
the point of disposal serves to
distinguish certain disposal practices
and facilities from other permitting and
regulatory requirements under Subtitle
C of RCRA. Many commenters argued
that there are significant advantages to
providing a clear regulatory boundary
which serves, in most cases, to separate
the jurisdiction of different
environmental programs. As discussed
above, LDR provisions that apply to
require treatment beyond removal of the
characteristic might require complicated
tracking and enforcement provisions
that would apply at many subtitle D
disposal facilities which are currently
not subject to any subtitie C
requirements. The most complicated of
such requirements would involve
enforcing levels below the characteristic
levels. To enforce and implement such
requirements, EPA would potentially
need to expand the universe of disposal
facilities covered by the LDR provisions
to perhapB thousands of facilities.
Requiring levels of treatment below
the characteristic level would also have
specific disruptive impact on practices
regulated, in part under the CWA. In
effect a treatment standard below
characteristic levels would need to be
met prior to placement in a surface
impoundment used in the treatment
process. EPA estimates that up to 2000
nonhazardous treatment impoundments
could be affected by a requirement for
treatment below characteristic levels.
There are other difficulties in applying
treatment standards below
characteristic levels to injection wells
regulated under the SDWA which are
described in detail below.
EPA does not believe that the current
technical data in the record justifies
treatment levels below characteristic
levels for the nonwastewater EP toxic
metals. Thus, EPA has not engaged in an
extensive balancing of regulatory
integration problems for the wastes in
this rule. For the EP toxic pesticides,
EPA believes treatment to the levels
provided for in the BDAT incineration
technology is important to destroy these
particularly dangerous pesticides.
Because there is a limited amount of.
these pesticides, EPA believes the -
-------
22856	Federal Register / Vol 55, No. 106 / Frtday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
environmental considerations outweigh
any difficulties in implementing the LOR
requirement to treat below the
characteristic level. For wastewaters,
EPA believes the regulatory difficulties
in integrating the CWA and SDWA
programs outweigh, the limited benefit
from additional treatment based on the
current information. Finally, EPA has set
requirements to removecertain toxic
constituents from certain ignitable and
reactive wastes. Some of these
treatment requirements are in the form,
of methods which are discnssed-below.
Again, EPA believes the environmental
benefit in terms of treatment outweights
die regulatory problems in providing
such standards for these wastes because
of the limited circumstances involving
such wastes.
4. Methods of treatment
a. Environmental Considerations. EPA
has express authority to specify
methods of treatment as the treatment
standard. As discussed above, this
necessarily entails a point of generation
approach. Imposition of these treatment
methods normally results in more than
the removal of the characteristic and
further m
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22657
solid waste programs under subtitle 0,
however, remain State and local
functions. Most States impose some set
of overall facility performance
standards; however, among the States,
specific design and operating standards
vary greatly.
Under the authority of sections
1008(a)(3) and 4004(a) of RCRA. EPA
promulgated the "Criteria fa
Classification of Solid Waste Disposal
Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR part
257), and subsequently issued minor
modifications to these Criteria. These
Subtitle O Criteria establish «n
-------
22658' Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1890 / Rules and Regulations
7. Exemption from LDR Prohibitions for
Characteristic Wastes Disposed Below
Characteristic Levels in Wells Regulated
under the SDWA
' a. Introduction. EPA has set out a
regulatory program under sections 1421,
1422, and 1425 of the SDWA which
CTH»aina "minimum requirements for
effective programs to prevent
underground injection which endangers
HHwirfng water sources." 42 U.S.C.
300h(b)(l). Class I deep wells inject
below die lowermost geologic formation
rmtaMng an underground source of
drinking water (USDW). 40 CFR
144.6(a).15 These wells are subject to
location, construction* and operating
requirements set out at 40 CFR parts 144
and 146. In addition, EPA may authorize
states to administer the UIC program. 40
CFR parts 145 and 147. There are
approximately 400 such wells currently
injecting only nonhazardous waste.
The large facilities that have these
wells often mix waste streams and '
through this mixing remove the
characteristic prior to disposal. A
dilution prohibition would require
restructuring of these facilities.
Alternatively, die facilities could apply
for a "no migration" variance under 40
CFR part 146.
b. Environmental Considerations.
LDR dilution rules for wastes currently
disposed of below the characteristic
levels in UIC wells would be limited to
toxic wastes. As discussed below, EPA
is generally providiggthat treatment of
ignitable, corrosive or reactive
wastewater may be accomplished.
simply by remoying the characteristic.
This could be accomplished by mixing.
(There are a few exceptions discussed in
the specific discussion on treatment
standards.) These general standards are
based on EPA's technical evaluation of
appropriate treatment for purposes of
3004{m) regardless of the disposal
scenario. Tims, for these particular
characteristic wastes, the application of
the part 2&8 dilution prohibition to
operators of nonhazardous waste
injection wells would not require any 1
additional treatment beyond what is
already occurring. Moreover, there is a
very limited amount of the pesticide
wastes D012-17, and EPA is unaware of
deepwell injection practices for these
wastes. Thus, die characteristic wastes
of concern'for UIC wells in this rule are
those that exhibit the characteristic of
EP toxicity for metals at the point of
generation.
EPA believes that die application of
dilution rules to these wastes, would not
further	threats to human
health and the environment
Specifically, EPA believes that disposal
of these metals by underground injection
at the characteristic level is as sound as
the treatment option. Native formation
fluids in injection zones already
substantial concentrations of these
metals. The addition of more metal-
bearing fluid below characteristic levels
would not appreciably alter these
concentrations. Moreover, the.
propensity of such metals to adhere to
and thereby, generally stay contained in
the injection zones makes the practice of
deep well disposal of such constituents
an MHiilmmnpntnlly 
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday! Jane 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
2265)
considerable disruption at facilities that
EPA generally considers safe. On
balance, EPA'believes it is appropriate
to exempt from the LDR prohibitions
characteristic waste disposed below the
characteristic level in these wells.
R Implementation ofRequirements for
Characteristic Wastes .. ,
In today's final rule, the Agency is
promulgating several new provisions
concerning implementation of the land
disposal restrictions for characteristic .
wastes. Specifically, the Agency is < •">
amending 40, CTR26&7 and adding 40
CFR26&9 to incorporate recordkeeping
requirements and special rales for -
characteristic wastes, and is revising die
current regulations is parts 281 and 282
regarding theidentification and
management of wastes that exhibit a
characteristic. In addition, die Agency is
clarifying which requirements apply
during the period of a national capacity
variance both to wastes that ate - -
prohibited oh the basis of exhibiting a .
characteristic only, and to wastes that
have applicable treatment standards as
both listed and characteristic wastes.
Finally, the Agency is clarifying whether
to apply the TCLP or EP analytical
methods to verify compliance with the .
treatment standards.
1. Overlap of Treatment Standards for
Listed Wastes that also Exhibit a
Characteristic!'
. The Agency Is today promulgating its
I approach with respect to
determining applicable treatment
standards for wastes that cany more
than one waste code.
(1)	Forwastes that cany mote than
one characteristic waste code, the waste
must be treated to meet the treatment
standard for each characteristic:
(2)	If a listed waste also exhibits one
or more hazardous characteristics, the
waste must be treated to-meet the
treatment standard for each of be waste
codes with one exception. Under that
exception, if the relevant constituents or
narrative characteristics are specifically
addressed in the treatment standard for
die listed waste, then the standard for ;
the listed waste operates in lieu of the '
standard for the relevant
characteristic's). •	—
One commenter suggested that EPA -
should require treatment incompliance-
with die most stringent treatment
standard rather than the most waste-
specific treatment standard. The Agency
disagrees, and EPA is following the
general principle set out in previous -
rulemakings that the more specific -
treatment standard takes precedence.
This is the principle EPA adopted with '
respect to California list wastes that are
covered by another treatment standard,
an analogous situation.See 52 FR 2S773
and 25776 (July 8,1987). At the same
time, when a listed waste exhibits a
characteristic that is not addressed by
the listed waste's treatment standard,
EPA believes it is necessary for that
characteristic to be treated to meet the
characteristic treatment standard.
Hie Agency received several
comments indicating that subjecting
listed wastes to treatment standards for
characteristics is a major shift in the
current regulatory program. As stated in
die proposed rule, the Agency believes
that to ignore the characteristic would
mean that the Third Third prohibition
for that characteristic is being ignored,
and that with respect to that constituent
die waste's toxicity or mobility is either
not being reduced or not being
minimized. Since this outcome would -
satisfy neither the statutory language
nor its policy. EPA is requiring
treatment As with the California list
wastes, EPA is applying this principle at
the point of generation, since otherwise
the treatment standard for the
characteristic constituent could be
ignored by removing the characteristic.
EPA is consequently promulgating new
requirements in § 26&A (b] and (c) as
proposed.
. EPA is further promulgating
provisions specifying that disposal of a
waste which at the point of disposal
exhibits a characteristic is prohibited
unless the treatment standard for that
characteristic component is above the
characteristic level: This approach is
again essentially the same as that which
EPA adopted for the analogous situation
involving California list wastes (see 52
FR 2S787), and is needed to ensure that
die statutory prohibition against
disposal of characteristic hazardous
pastes is not violated.
2. Revisions to Waste Identification
Requirements
A consequence of die Agency*d
interpretation that the prohibition for
characteristic wastes can apply
concurrently to wastes that also are
listed is a change in the initial
determination mat a generator must
make pursuant to 9 282.11. That section
presently sets out an either/or scheme
where if the generator determines that a
waste is listed, the generate? does not
need to determine whether die waste
exhibits a characteristic (40 CFR 282.11
(b)'and (c)). For purposes of compliance
' with part 268, however, the generator
would need to know if the waste .
exhibits a characteristic, even if the
waste is listed, because further
treatment of the waste is required if the
treatment standard for the listed waste
does not address the characteristic
property. Consequently, EPA is
amending section 282.11 to indicate" that
generators must determine whether
listed wastes also exhibit characteristics
of hazardous waste for purposes of
compliance with part 288.
In addition. 99 281.21—261^4 indicate
that wastes that exhibit the respective
characteristics and are not listed have
the designations D001-D017. However,
as discussed above, generators (and
other handlers) will need to know both
the listed waste code and the
characteristic waste code in the event a
listed waste also exhibits a
characteristic which is not addressed by
the treatment standard for the listed
waste. EPA is consequently amending
the language in these sections to
indicate that wastes that cany
characteristic waste codes may also be
listed wastes.
3. Wastes Subject to a Capacity
Variance
RCRA section 3004(h)(4) states that
during periods of national capacity
variances and case-by-case extensions,
hazardous wastes subject to those
extensions that are disposed in landfills
and surface impoundments may only be
dispose ±of if the landfill or surface
impoundment is in compliance with the
minimum technological requirements of
section 3004(o). EPA has interpreted this
language to mean that the landfill or
impoundment unit receiving such wastes
must be in compliance with the
minimum technological requirements,
9 288£(h)(2), and this interpretation was
sustained in Mobil Oil v. EPA. 871F. 2d
149 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
Under the present rule, it is possible
for prohibited characteristic wastes
subject to a national capacity variance
to become nonhazardous. For example,
certain D009 mercury wastes are subject
to a two-year national capacity
variance. It during the period of the
variance, such a waste was treated to be
nonhazardous by a means other than
retorting and was disposed of in a
landfill or surface impoundment
arguably the landfill or impoundment
unit would have to meet the minimum
technological requirements.
EPA doetf not read the statute or the
rules this way. Rather, section 3004(h)(4)
only requires compliance "with the
requirements of subsection (o)." Section
3004(o), in turn, only applies to units
subject to SubtiUe G. See also
9 288.5(h)(2), which likewise imposes -
minimum technological requirements
only on landfill and impoundment units
that are permitted or that have interim
status. Consequently, EPA dot" not.
-------
39BflQ Federal Register / VoL 55. Wo. 108 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regclatfong
interpret these provisions as requiring
subtideD landfill and surface
impoundment units receiving prohibited
wastes during a nations! capacity
variance to have to satisfy the minimum
technological requirements.
Finally, for wastes that are subfectto
mors than one treatment standard, the .
Agency- is clarifying that.during the.
period of a national capacity variance
for one of the wastes, the treatment
standards for any otherwaste codes
that have not received sueh a variance
most be met For example, if a K048
nonwastewater also exhibits the
characteristic for chromium, the waste-
has a six-month capacity extension as a
K048Hated waste, but no capacity
extension as a D007 characteristic
waste. Therefore, at a mftrJmtmi, the
waste most be treated to meet the
treatment standard for D007 (and any
other applicable characteristic treatment
standard] prior to land disposal. This
requirement ia consistent with the
Agency's approach in previous
rulemakings fat which it stated that in
setting the treatment standard, die
Agency fs making a more waste-specific .
determination; however, this
determination to not effect!re until the
capacity variance ends. Because
capacity exists to treat the characteristic
waste, the characteristic treatment
standards still apply, end the KM8
waste must meet the prohibitions far
characteristic wastes. The K048
treatment standard would then become
applicable when the national capacity
variance expires. See S3 FR 31188.
Furthermore, if such Bated/
characteristic wastes have been treated
so that they no longer exhibit any
characteristic and are to-be disposed of
on a surface impoundment or landfill,
the unit must meet the minimum
technology requirements set out in
section 3004{o), as required for listed
wastes during die period of a national
capacity variance.
4. Use pt TCLP v. EP Analytical Methods
for Compliance
The Agency proposed two
alternatives fat the proposed rate, that
treatment standards for characteristic
wastes either be a numerical standard
(typically lower then the characteristic
levial) oi be established at "the
characteristic leveL" See. e.g* 54 PR
48430/3. If the latter alternative were
adopted, the Agency did not specify
whether Un characteristic level would
be measured fay the EP test or by the
TCLP. The Agency did indicate in a
somewhat different context, however,
that it strongly prefers to use the TCLP
to measure compliance wherever
possible Id. at48432/3.
As stated in section OLD of today's
preamble, EPA is establishing treatn)eni
standards for most characteristic wastes
at the characteristic leveL The Agency
has determined that this level should be
measured by tha TQJP. This is die
protocol that large quantity generators
will use to assess this toxicity of their
wastes starting, on September 25,1890
and small quantity generators will begin
using on March 2&198L It ia also the
protocol used to measure the efficacy of
stabilization or other immobilization
treatment in most of the BDAT
standards. Most of the data submitted in
response to the Agency's proposal were
basied on the TCLP to measure treatment
performance, and these data indicate
(with a few exceptions) that treatment
to the characteristic level, as measured
by the TCLP. is achievable^ (These data,
incidentally, woe available for reply
comments, and the Agency received
dozens of reply comments on the data.)
Furthermore, if EPA were to establish
the EP as the protocol to measure
compliance with metal standards, then
regulated entities would have to subject
many wastes to both die EP (for
purposes of land disposal restriction
compliance) and the TCLP (for waste -
identification purposes). The Agency
prefers not to impose this type of
duplicative burden. Accordingly, the
Agency is adopting the TCLP as the
means of measuring compliance with the
metal standards for toxic characteristic
Third Third wastes in this rale, with two
exceptions. For lead characteristic
nonwastewaters and all
nonwastewaters containing arsenic as
the primary hazardous constituent (io,
D004, KQ31, K084, K101, KlQZ, P010,
P011, P012, P038, P038, and U136], the
Agency is specifying that if a waste does
not achieve' the nonwastewater
standard based on analysis of a TCLP
extract but does achieve the standard
based on analysis of an EP extract the
waste is in compliance with the
standard. The Agency is taking this
action because fee performance data
used to develop the treatment standards
for these wastes were based on EP
toxicity leachate data. A more detailed
discussion is provided in section QLA of
today's preamble.
5. Newly Identified TC Wastes
There ia one final interpretive point
dealing with die interplay of the EP and
the new TCLP. EPA interprets the
statute such that wastes that exhibit the
toxicity characteristic by the TCLP but
not the EP are not presently prohibited,
even if the constitueat cauatng the waste
to exhibit the TCLP is also a constituent
controlled by the EP. This is because
such wastes are newly identified
. pursuant to RCRA section 3004(gX4);
they were identified as hazardous after
November 7.1884.
6. Further Principles Governing
Applicability
a.	Other Statutory Exemptions or
Exclusions. The issues in this
rulemaking concerning when hazardous
wastes become prohibited from lend
disposal does not change the status of
other regulatory or statutory inclusions
or exclusions to the definition of solid or
hazardous waste found at 40 CFR 281.2-
.6. These provisions can override the
LDR point of generation evaluation to
keep wastes from being prohibited and
subject to a dilution prohibition or
treatment standard This result is
consistent with EPA's existing
regulation at 40 CFR 288.1.
EPA believes that different legal and
policy considerations under exclusions
from the statutory and regulatory
definitions of Bolid waste and hazardous
waste require an evaluation of the
status of die waste at the point of
disposaL Generally, these exclusions
address die status of the waste without
regard to a particular constituent
concentration, and thus do not involve
issues of treatment levels or dilution.
EPA has not fully analyzed these
exclusions and. in the absence of
specific justification, will continue to
provide exclusions from the land
disposal restrictions for waste excluded
from die definition of hazardous or solid
waste under 40 CFR 281.2-.8.
For example, solid waste does not
include solid or dissolved material in
domestic sewage. RCRA section
1004(27). EPA regulations further
provide that any mixture of domestic
- sewage and other waste that passes
through a sewer system to a Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW) for
treatment ia not solid waste. 40 CFR
281.4(a)(1). Thus, even if a waste is
hazardous at the point of generation, the
. domestic sewage exclusion would allow
land disposal of the solid waste at the
POTW without meeting treatment
standards under section 3004{m)
(assuming that there is no land disposal
of the waste before it becomes subject
to the domestic sewage exclusion).
b.	Restricted Wastes Versus
Prohibited Wastes. Consistent with the
cradle-to-grave mandate of RCRA's land
disposal restrictions, those who manage
hazardous waste will need to assesa
what LDR prohibitions apply at different
pointa in fee waste ajmaymant
process. First, generators of restricted
wastes mast assess whether the waste
is prohibited under the LDR. Restricted
waste ia defined by several conditions.
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22861
See 51FR at 4081B-40832 (November 7,
1988); 54 FR 38987,38988 (Sept 8,1989).
As discussed above, however, certain
statutory exemptions that would be
evaluated at the point of land disposal
may apply to restricted wastes.
Moreover, during either a national
capacity variance under section
3004(h)(2) or a case-by-case variance
under section 3004(h)(3), disposal of
certain restricted wastes into certain
units would not be prohibited. Also,
placement of waste in a "no migration"
unit is not prohibited land disposal, nor
is placement in an impoundment in
compliance with 40 CFR 2884. In
- addition, there are situations where
waste fan managed in a way. which
results in no land disposal. EPA outlined
which LDR prohibitions attach to wastes
managed under each one of the above
scenarios in 54 FR 38987,38988
(September 8,1989).
& Changes in Treatability Groups.
The question of whether a given waste
is going to prohibited land disposal is
complicated by die fact that wastes may
change form or treatability groups after
undergoing treatment Forexample,
treatment of a wastewater often
generates a nonwaste water sludge as
well as a treated wastewater. Also,
incineration of a nonwastewater can
generate a nonwastewater (ash) as well
as a wastewater (scrubber water). (A
treatability group is defined both in -
terms of the applicable waste code and -
the form the waate is in.) The specific
problem addressed here, whichoccurs
moat often with respect to characteristic
wastes, is the effect that changes in
"treatability groups have on the initial
status of a waste as prohibited or non-
prohibited.
First by way of background, the part
148 and 288 regulations generally divide
die universe of wastes potentially
subject to land disposal prohibitions
into two broad categories: wastewaters
and nonwastewaters. For purposes of
the LOR program, "wastewaters" are
generally defined to have less than IX
total organic carbon (TOC) and less
than 1% total suspended solids. Any
other waste stream is deemed a
nonwastewater. (There are certain
enumerated exceptions from certain
wastes such aB F001-F005 solvents, and.
KOll. K013, and K014 acrylonitrile
wastes. See generally J 28&2 in today's
rule, incorporating the various
. regulatory definitions.) Part 288 provides
for different treatment standards for
these two broad categories of waste. -
The standards may also have different
effective dates because of national
capacity variances. Treatment
standards for listed wastes apply to die
wapte.as generated as well as to all of
the residual wastes that are generated in
treating the original prohibited waste.
See 53 FR 31138,31145 (August 17,1988).
However, when EPA specifies a
treatment method as the treatment
standard, residues resulting from the
required treatment method are no longer
prohibited from land disposal (unless
EPA should specify other requirements).
54 FR 28594.28624.28630 dune 23,
1989)."
A change in treatability group during
the waste management process can
affect whether the waste prior to the
change in treatability groups is subject
to certain LDR requirements. The
following rales are important to
understand this point First, if a
treatability group, and treatment
residues in the same treatability group,
is not going to prohibited land disposal,
then neither the original waste nor the
residue is subject to the treatment
standards or to the dilution prohibition.
As a corollary, waste is prohibited if the
treatability group, or residues from die
same treatability group is land disposed.
This interpretation provides a clear line
of demarcation, avoids the enormous
difficulties of determining new points of
generation every time a hazardous
waste is altered in some respect and
avoids having an initial waste's status
as prohibited determined in all cases by
some later management of a residue
derived from the initial waste.
d. Examples. Several examples will be
useful to help clarify this point
Example 1. Listed wastewater A is
treated in a tank that yields two residue
streams: nonwastewater residue B and
wastewater residue C. The
nonwastewater residue island disposed
and the wastewater residue is
discharged pursuant to an NPDES
permit without being land disposed.
Only nonwastewater residue B is
going to prohibited land disposal
Moreover, residue B is a newly
generated hazardous waste belonging to
a different treatability group than the
original waste. See 53 FR 31209; 52 FR
25887 coL 1 (July 8,1987). The original
hazardous wastewater A is a restricted
waste, but not prohibited, and so is not
subject to the dilution prohibition in 40
CFR 28&3 or any treatment standard
under part 288. Wastewater residue C
IT A facility Is not allowed to dilate or peituiui
partial treatment oo a waste In order to switch the
applicability ot a nonwastewater standard to a
wastswattr standard at vice vena. See 52 FR 21012
(Jona 4,1887): bat see S2 FR 2S787 (Jane 8.1887)
noting special drenrnstanow when California H»t
'.waate* an Involved. Dewatering	(melt'
as filtration and ceotrifugation) that an designed to
separata wastewater from nonwastewater aw not
prohibited.
also is a restricted waste (due to die
"derived from rale" it carries the same
hazardous waste code under 40 CFR
part 281 as the original waste A), but it
is not a prohibited waste because the
wastewater treatability group is not
going to prohibited land disposal.
Example Z listed nonwastewater D is
treated to yield two nonwastewater
residues E and F (which carry the same
waste code as D based on the derived
from rule). Residue E is incinerated and
the ash is land disposed: residue F is
directly reused as a substitute for a
commercial chemical product In this
case, nonwastewaters D and E are
- subject to treatment standards and the
dilution prohibition. EPA does not want
impermissible dilution of
nonwastewater D to be the reason that
the nonwastewater residue E meets the
BDAT level Thus, since there is no ¦
change in treatability group between the
original point of generation and land
disposal for one residue of the original
waste D the part 288 prohibitions apply.
However, residue F is not a prohibited
waste because the definition of solid
waste excludes secondary materials
that are directly reused as substitutes
forcommerdal chemical products.
As illustrated by the above examples,
a unit treatment operation can be a
point of generation for certain
treatability groups. To assess what
prohibitions apply, one must first
determine whether any residues of the
listed waste go to prohibited land
disposal If no residues are land
disposed then part 288 treatment
requirements do not apply. If one or
more residues are placed in prohibited
land disposal the dilution prohibition
applies between the point of land
disposal and the point that a given
treatability group first exists. In example
1, that point is immediately after the
tank treatment operation. In example 2,
that point is the original point of
generation for nonwastewater D.
The rules regarding treatability groups
apply similarly to characteristic wastes.
TTie fact that a waste loses its
hazardous characteristic at some point
prior to land disposal does not
constitute a change in treatability group.
The fact that the derived from rule does
not apply to characteristic wastes is
irrelevant because the derived from rule
only affects hazardous waste status, not
treatability group determination (which
1b a function of physical form). To
determine if a characteristic waste is
prohibited, die decision is still made
based on whether the waste or any
residue in the same treatability group is
destined for land disposaL This
approach is necessary to assure that this
-------

Federal Register / VoL 55. Wo. IPS / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
level was met by treatment and not by
dilution. The following example helps
illustrate this decision rale.
Example 3i Wastewater J is BP toxic
for lead. It is treated in a tank and
generates a sludge K, that is non-
hazardon. The treated wastewater L,
which no longer exhibits a
characteristic, is then sent to a surface
impoundment far farther treatment, after
which it is discharged under an NFDES-
pennit The shtdge is sent to a landfilL
His shidge K is not a restricted
hazardous waste; notwithstanding that
it derives from treatment of a
characteristic hazardous waste. This is
because it is a new treatability group
which is not hazardous at point of
generation. The statnsof wastewaters J
and Lis determined by the special rales
for characteristic wastes managed in
CWA systems; therefore, they axe
prohibited wastes bet are not subject to
a dilution prohibition. Since wastewater
L meets the treatment standard when it
is land disposed, the disposal is legaL
Example 4. Electroplating wastewater
M which exhibits a hazardous
characteristic, is treated in a tank to
yield a treeted wastewater N and a
nonwastewater sludge O. the treated
wastewater N, which no longer exhibits
a hazardous flharartBrfaffc. is discharged
into a Class f injection well and the
sludge is sent to a fan end 9 268*7 (b)(4) and
(b)(5)).	The first point the Agency
wishes to address is the existing
requirements that apply when restricted
wastes are managed on-site. At a
minimum, certain recordkeeping
requirements are triggered. Section
2887(a) states that generators must first
determine whether their waste is
restricted. Section 288JfaX&) indicates
that generators must retain a copy of aO
demonstrations and other waste
analysis or documentation for all wastes
sent to either on-site as off-site
treatment, storage, or disposal. The
Agency interprets these two provisions .
to mean that ordinarily generators
managing hazardous wastes on-site
must determine if the waste is restricted,
and keep some documentation of that
determination plus some documentation
of where tfae restricted waste was
treated, stored or disposed—whether
treatment, storage, or disposal occurs
on-site or off-site. These recordkeeping
requirements for on-site management
are needed to implement the various
prohibitions or to account tor those
restricted wastes that for gome reason -
are not also prohibited. The Agency
notes briefly that certain wastes are not
subject to recordkeeping requirements
at ail by virtue of the exemptions from
all of part 288 that are contained in
sections 288.1 (b) and (e). (See 54 FR
38988 (Septembers, 1989) discussing
what a "restricted" waste is.)
The Agency is applying die existing
9 288.7 (a) and (a)(8) requirements to
characteristic wastes that are restricted
under today's final rule. These
requirements apply even when the
hazardous characteristic is removed
prior to disposal, or when die waste is
excluded from the definition of
hazardous or solid waste under 9 261.2-
' & subsequent to the point of generation.
Far example, if a characteristic waste is
npt prohibited because it is discharged
pursuant to a NPDES permit without
land disposal, some record must stfil be
kept indicating why the waste Is not
prohibited. (For example, a statement
that there is no lend disposal in the
system prior to theS 281.4 exclusion
would be kept in the facility's operating
record.) Hie rationale for this is that the
9 281.4(a](l) exclusion for domestic
sewage does not attach until the mixture
passes through the sewer system to a
POTW; in the fnterfm, the waste is
restricted. (See also section IHE.6 of
today's final rule.) Finally, this
infoimatfon should already exist in any
case, to justify the absence of subtitle C
regulation.
B. Tracking (Le. Notification/
Certification) Provisions Applicable to
Generators Shipping Wastes OS-Site
Under existing 9 2887(a), generators
. managing restricted wastes must
determine whether the wastes meet
applicable treatment standards on the .
point of generation, or are otherwise
exempt from those standards. Separate
tracking provisions apply to each of
these situations. Section 288.7(a) (1). (2),
end (3). In all cases, however, the
generator must prepare a notice for each
off-site shipment setting out the
hazardous waste identification number,
applicable treatment standard or
prohibition level, manifest number, and
available waste analysis data. If a
generator's waste meets the treatment
standard, the generator must prepare a
certification to this effect (EPA is thus
using the terms "tracking document"
and "notification and certification"
synonymously in the discussion that
follows.)
If a generator's characteristic waste
has been treated to meet the treatment
standard before it is sent off-site, EPA
believes that die existing tracking
scheme requires some modification.
There are two principal reasons to make
changes. Characteristic wastes that
meet treatment standards will be sent
(almost invariably) to subtitle D
facilities. EPA Is concerned that sending
part 288 notifications find certifications
-------
Federal Registo / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday. June 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22663
to.snbtiile D facilities could be
counterproductive. These facilities are
not familial with subtitle C paperwork .
and could easily mintnkfl the tracking
forma (La the notifications and
certifications) foi manifesto and refuse
to accept the shipment. Even if the forms
are not mistaken far manifests, the
subtitle D facilities could view the forms
a& describing hazardous wastes and
. refuse to accept the wastes. This could
retoh in a situation where scarce
subtitle C management capacity is used
for noa-haiArdous wastes because
subtitle D facilities are refusing the non-
hazardouswastes.
These potential misunderstandings
are probably solvable as subtitle D
operators become more sophisticated
and as EPA further implements its land
disposal restriction training and
guidance efforts. The Agnecy believes
further, however, that under today's rale
no important interest wouldbe
vindicated by requiring notifications and
certifications to be sent to subtitle D
facilities. When listed wastes are .
involved, the tracking document tells
disppsal facilities what standard the
waste must meet before it can be land
disposed. Treatment standards for most
characteristic wastes ate established at
characteristic levels, however. Thus,
these wastes can be land disposed in a
subtitle D facility when they no longer
exhibit a characteristic. Having a
generator cotify to an off-site subtitle D
facility that the waste no longer exhibits
a characteristic adds little or nothing to
the information the disposal facility
needs (o know t& dispose of the waste.
'That ia, the disposal facility already '
must determine that the waste no longer
exhibits a characteristic. Since under the
present rule, sending the tracking forms
to subtitle D facilities could normally
have only the counterproductive effects
discussed in the previous paragraph, .
EPA has determined that the tracking
fonns should not accompany shipments
from generators to subtitle D facilities.
(As noted below, the Agency i» adopting
the same approach for any shipments to
subtitle D facilities, so that a treatment
facility that has treated a characteristic
waste to meet a treatment standard also
would not send tracking documents to a
subtitle D disposal facility.) EPA
realizes that some of the treatment
standards in today's rule, notably those
for reactive cyanides and pesticides,
and the standards for characteristic
wastes that an treatment methods,
woold generally result in treatment
below characteristic levels, in these
cases, the tracking documents wonld
add information useful to a-subtitfe D
.facility. EPA is concerned enough about .
potential confusion and disruption of
subtitle D disposal practices, however,
that at this time the Agency believes it
the better decision not to require
tracking documents for this set of
wastes to go to subtitle D facilities.
By deciding that tracking documents
for prohibited characteristic wastes that
no longer exhibit a characteristic should
not go to subtitle D facilities, the Agency
is not deciding that notifications am)
certifications should not be prepared tor
such wastes. The Agency's concern is
where thoee notifications and
certifications are sent EPA believes,
and is requiring, that the notifications
and certifications be sent to the
appropriate EPA Regional Administrator
or his delegated representative, or to a
state authorized to implement the land
disposal restrictions. The person
preparing the notification and
certification must also'include the
identity and address of die facility
where the treated waste is sent,
including the address. This is die
approach the Agency adopted in an
analogous circumstance where sending
notifications and certifications to the
ultimate disposer would be
counterproductive or otherwise be ill-
advised See 3 28&7(b}{B) and 53 FR
31198 (Aug. 17.1988) (notifications and
- certifications of persons treating
hazardous wastes to produce hazardous
waste-derived products that are to be
used in a manner constituting disposal
are to send die notifications and
certifications to EPA or to an authorized
state, not to the ultimate user of ths
hazardous waste-derived product). By
requiring notifications and certifications
tn juppa KPA nUr> namiHwg that
a record is kept that the characteristic
waste has been treated to meet the
standard and not impermissibly diluted.
Generators (or treatment facilities, see
below) would also have to certify that
these requirements were satisfied. Thus,
the key objectives of the notification -
and certification provisions are
satisfied.
EPA is making some alight
modifications fn the notification form '
that would be sent to EPA (or to an
authorized state). This is because the
existing notification form refers to the
wn IT1 nnroVicr nrrrf mmrffpat rnnrfwf
when shipped. Since wastes no longer
exhibiting a characteristic have neither
an ID number nor a manifest number,
some small modifications are necessary.
While the notification fonn would not
contain hazardous waste codes, it must
contain a complete and accurate
description of the waste, including its
former hazardous waste classification.
In addition, although a manifest number
would not be included; the notifications
must clearly identify the faciGty
receiving the waste.
EPA is not amending the tracking
requirements for those characteristic
wastes that still exhibit a characteristic
when they are sent off-site. All of the
normal i 28&7(a)(l) notice requirements
fit this situation (Le. the waste has an ID
number; it does have to have a manifest,
etc.) and do not require any change. The
tracking document also would be going
to a subtitle C facility so that nose of the
counterproductive effects discussed
above with respect to subtitle D
facilities would occur. Thus, no changes
to existing rules are required.
Hie following examples illustrate how
the revised tracking requirements would
apply to generators of characteristic
wastes:
1.	Generator A generates a D008
nonwastewater that is sent off-site to a
treatment facility.
The generator would prepare a
S 288.7(a)(1) notice which would set out
the EPA hazardous waste number,
treatment standards, manifest number,
and any waste analysis data. Because
the waste is still hazardous, no revised
notice is necessary.
2.	Generator B generates a D008
nonwastewater that is not a spent lead
acid battery. Hie generator treats the
waste on-site to meet the treatment
standard and then sends it off-site for
disposal in a subtitle D landfill.
Generator B would have to prepare a
notice and certification to document that
the waste has met the treatment
standard and has not been diluted
impermissibly. Rather than send the
notification and certification to a
subtitle D facility, the generator would
send it Instead to die EPA Regional
Office or to an authorized state.
Included on the notification would be
the identity and location of the subtitle
D fadBty where the waste has been
sent
C. Tracking Provisions Applicable to
Treaters
EPA Is adopting the same approach
for treaters of characteristic wastes as it
is for generators. Thus, tracking
documents for shipments of
characteristic wastes that meet a
treatment standard, and therefore no
longer exhibit a characteristic of
hazardous waste, would be sent to EPA
or an authorized state (along with
information documenting the receiving
facility's location), not to a subtitle D
facility. The reasons are the same as
those far generators discussed above.
EPA is also making the same slight
-------
22684
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. June 1. 1990 / Rulea and Regulatjons
adjustments in the notification
requirement
Hie following examples illustrate how
die amended rules would apply to
treater*
1.	Treater A receives a D007
nonwastewater that it treats to meet the
treatment standard and sends to a
subtitle D landfill. The treater also -
generates a wastewater in the course of ~
treatment that does not exhibit a
characteristic.
The treater must prepare a notice and
•certification which it would send to the
EPA Regional Office or to an authorized
state. The wastewater generated during
treatment is not a prohibited waste
because it is a new treatability group
whose status as a non-prohibited waste
is determined when it (Le. die new
treatability group) is generated.
Therefore, pari 268 does not apply to the
wastewater.
2.	Treater B receives a high TOC
ignitable waste that it incinerates. The
ash. which no longer exhibits a
characteristic, is sent to a Subtitle D.
landfill.
The treater would prepare a
notification and certification and send
them to EPA or to an authorized state.'.
as in the previous example. At least at
this time, the Agency is not requiring
that tracking documents be sent to
subtitle D facilities, even when the
treatment standard is a designated
method.
D. Land Disposal Facilities
Under existing rules, subtitle C
jiisposalfacilitiea receiving prohibited
wastes must Keep copies of die notice'
and certification prepared by the
generator and/or the treater, must test
wastes (or waste extracts) at a
frequency specified in their waste
analysis plan (as modified in today's
rule), and must dispose of certain types
of wastes in minimum technology units.
Section 288.7(c) (1), (2), and (3). These
requirements do not fit well for the
characteristic wastes prohibited in
today's rule. The requirement of
disposal in minimum technology units
does not have any applicability at alL
Moreover, if a land disposal facility is a
subtitle D facility receiving non-
hazardous waste. EPA does not believe
that testing requirements are
appropriate to implement today's rule.
These facilities are already barred from
accepting hazardous waste and so must
ascertain if the wastes they are
receiving exhibit a characteristic. Thus,
since few of the treatment standards
adopted today require treatment to
levels below the characteristic, the
Agency believes that existing controls to
ensure against receipt of hazardous
waste will constitute sufficient
corroborative testing by a disposal
facility. The Agency is thus indicating
that the requirements of $ 28&7(c) do
not apply to Subtitle D disposal facilities
receiving wastes that no longer exhibit a
characteristic.
E. Changes in Certification to Reflect
Dilution Prohibition
EPA is also "wwntiig the
certifications of compliance required of
treaters and generators to state that the
treatment standard was not achieved by
a form of impermissible dilution. This
requirement of course, is already
contained in 8 26&3 and today's
amendment simply includes a reference
to this requirement in the certification.
(The existing certifiestion'for treatment
facilities in fact refers to the dilution
prohibition, but does so in an overbroad
manner by referring to all dilution,
rather than only impermissible dilution.
EPA is thus modifying this reference in
today's rule.)
G. The Dilution Prohibition as it Applies
to Centralized Treatment
1. Background
EPA discussed the issue of
permissible and impermissible dilution
of prohibited wastes at length in
previous rulemakings. EPA's existing
rules state that prohibited wastes
cannot be diluted in order to circumvent
a statutory or regulatory prohibition or
effective date. 40 CFR 26&3.1* The rules
also generally discourage aggregation of
wastes not amenable to co treatment by
providing that when wastes with
different standards for a common
constituent are combined for purposes
of treatment, the treatment residue must
meet the lowest applicable treatment
standard. 40 CFR 26841(b).
In interpretive preamble discussions,
the Agency explained that these rules
are not intended to discourage
legitimate centralized treatment and
that aggregation of wastes preceding
legitimate centralized treatment is not
considered to be impermissible dilution.
See 82 FR 25788 (July 8,1987) and
other notices there cited. However, the
Agency noted that centralized treatment
of incompatible wastestreams was not
legitimate treatment and constitutes
impermissible dilution. Id. For example,
it is impermissible dilution to aggregate
a heavily concentrated organic solvent
for which incineration is the appropriate
treatment technology with less
11 Although taction 28&3 Is written in terms of
"rssMctstf hanrdoas wastes. It applies equally to
the narrower class of prohibited hazardous wastes.
Sea M FR 38868 (Sept 8,1888) explaining the
applicability of tin dilution prohibition.
concentrated solvent streams for which
biological treatment is appropriate.19
In this rulemaking, EPA believes that
it is a necessary and responsible action
on the Agency's part to indicate how -
these existing rules apply when
prohibited characteristic wastes are
involved. Contrary to the views of some
of the commentere, this is not a new
issue unrelated to the general substance
of die Third Third rulemaking. Absent
discussion, the existing rules would still
apply to prohibited characteristic
. wastes, but the regulated community
would be unaware of how the Agency
interpreted their, application and would
be potentially unable to determine how
to conduct their operations in order to
comply with the dilution prohibition.
EPA also believes that further
clarification of the dilution rules with
respect to prohibited listed wastes is
warranted.
2. Summary of Proposal
EPA's proposal dealt with two
particular issues. The first was the
question of what constitutes legitimate
'treatment as opposed to impermissible
dilution. The Agency indicated that any
dilution that failed to meet the section
3004(m) standard of substantially
reducing the prohibited waste's toxicity
or mobility would be impermissible, and
further proposed to quantify this
statutory standard by indicating that
there must be some actual reduction in
the prohibited waste's toxicity or
mobility as a result of treatment 54 FR
48494. To satisfy this test the Agency
Indicated at a minimum that there would
need to be actual reduction through
treatment of at least one BDAT
constituent for each prohibited waste
that is treated. Id. EPA further proposed
that any dilution of a prohibited waste
to render it non-hazardous, in lieu of
treating, would be considered
impermissible. Id. at 48495. The Agency
solicited comment however, on whether
dilution could be considered a legitimate
form of treatment for certain prohibited
characteristic wastes. Id. at 48498.
These proposals were the focus of
many of the comments, most dealing
with the implications for wastewater
'* EPA notes that its authority to promulgate a
dilution prohibition rests not only on the land
disposal restriction statutory provisions and
Congressional directives (see in particular section
30M(m) and related statutory requi^ments for EPA
to establish pretreatment standards as a condition
to land disposal; see aim R Rep. No. 188,98th
Cong. 1st Seas. 38 (1883) and S. Rep. No. 294,88th
Cong. 1st Sen. 17), but in addition, the more genet
authority In section 3001(a)(3) to establish treatmei
standards "as may be satisfactory to the
Administrator" and "as may be necessary to protect
hmww health and the environment".
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, Jane 1.1990 / Rules and Regulations
22665
treatment systems that include land-
based treatment [often biological
treatment ponds) ok storage (for
example, holding ponds for corrosive
wastes that have bees neutralized by
dilution}. Commenters also correctly
viewed this issue as being intertwined
(at proposal) with the implications of
leqmn twahninit nf i-tiawirfwlrilff
WftftfBS	looy|^
More broadly still. the issue presents
another aspect of the question of
whether to determine if wastes are
prohibited at the point of generation or '
at the point of disposal.
3. Today's Action
The existing rules on dilution and .
EPA's interpretive statements regarding
those rales indicate that the (Station
prohibition has a two-fold objective: (1)
To ensure that prohibited wastes are
actually treated: and (2) to ensure that
prohibited wastes are treated by
methods that are appropriate far that
type of waste. ERA has acknowledged
that prohibited wastes which are
aggregated are not dihted
impermissibly if they are treated
legitimately in centralized treatment
systems; Irrespective of die dilution
inherent in such a system. Thus, if
"dilution" fa a legitimate type of
treatment, or a necessary-prefreatment
step fat a legitimate treatment system,
such dilution is permissible. Conversely,
prohibited wastes that are "treated" by
inappropriate methods, or sent to
treatment systems that do not treat the
wastes, are diluted impermissibly.
In applying these principles to
-characteristic wastes, EPA encountered
two major difficulties: first, the interface
with regulatory systems established
pursuant to the Clean Water Act and
Safe Drinking Water Act and second,
difficulties in being able to quantify the
proposal in a meaningful way. In section
HLD above; we have already discussed
the potential difficulties of Integrating a
full-scale dilation prohibition with the
Clean Water Act*s NPDE9 and
prefreatment regulations, and the Safe .
Drinking Water Acts UtC program. We
explain below the attempts EPA mads
to quantify the proposed standard, and
the obstacles the Agency encountered.
The Agency's proposal to require
reduction of a BDAT constituent as a
means of evaluating if impermissible
dilution has occurred did not indicate
how much reduction would be deemed
adequate, and thus without further
elaboration not only fails to provide
clear jpiidance bat also potentially fails
to achieve the objective of assuring that
wastes are treated by an appropriate
treatment method More importantly;
quantifying the extent of removal -
necessary to be considered legitimate
treatment leads to a very complicated
system given the lumber of prohibited
wastes, treatability jpoups. treatment
methods and treatment train'
ormfignrnHnnn.
Given these problems and
nnmplionHrmj EPA han AartAenf that the
most constructive course is to provide
additional Interpretive guidance on the
existing dilation prohibition contained
In ft 28&3, and to explain more fully how
those rules-would apply hi specific
situations. We also explain again how
we have determined to deal with the
interface between RCRA and other
wastewater regulatory programs.
a. The existing dilation prohibition
ordinarily would not apply to prohibited
characteristic wastes generated and
managed In treatment systems regulated
by the CWA orSDWA. As explained in
a previous section, EPA has determined
in most cases not to apply a dilution
prohibition to characteristic wastes that
are generated and managed in treatment
systems regulated under the CWA or
SDWA. EPA believes, however, that
where the Agency has established a
method as the treatment standard for a
characteristic wasteland that where
application of that method fa consistent
with and promoting of the objectives of
the Clean Water Act or the Safe
Drinking Water Act programs, then fee
method of treatment attaches to the
waste at the point of generation, and
dilution to change the treatability groop
to avoid application of the method is
impermissible. For example, hi this rale,
this is true of the ignitible
nonwastewaters containing greater than
10% TOC and the toxic pesticide
wastewaters (D012-17) if these wastes
are managed in wastewater treatment
systems regulated under the Clean
Water Act The treatment method far
these wastes is incineration, fuel
substitution, or some type of wastewater
treatment technology tint destroys '
oigmricn- Not only are these wastes
amenable to eonbostion treatment (or
other treatment that destroys arganics),
but they typically contain higi
concentrations of toxic organic
constituents whose destruction farthers
the RCRA goal of decreasing waste
toxicity and Mhrfrafatwg threats from
land disposal
Prohibiting dilution of these wastes
[i.en requiring application at a specified
treatment method) is entirely consistent
with the existing regulatory framework
of CWA's NPDES/pre treatment
programs. For example, the 10* TOC
Ignitible wastes are inappropriate far •
wastewater treatment as they would
overwhelm the capacity olmost
biological treatment systems. (As noted
in die preamble section describing the
D001 treatment standards. EPA in fact
developed the 10% TOC cutoff for
Ignitible wastes based on the outer limit
of design capacity for biological
treatment systems.] The Clean Water
Act effluent limitations guidelines and
the standards addressing these types of
wastes already contemplate that these
wastes will not be diluted, but rather
will be treated in the appropriate
manner.
Hie logic that forces this decision for
these wastes in a NPDES/pre treatment
Clean Water Act system is not equally
persuasive in the case of wastes '
disposed of by Injection. As noted in
section HLD. Class I deep wells inject
below the lowermost geological
formation containing an underground
source of Hrfnlrfng water. Deep wells are
not currently injecting wastes that
contain any of the pesticide constituents
found in D012-17 characteristic wastes.
Additionally, there Is not a design
concern of overwhelming the biological
treatment system in the deep well
scenario. In this instance, it is illogical
to force deep wells to utilize a specified
method as there is little concomitment
environmental or technical benefit
through its utilization. Therefore, in
today s Qnal rule, the Agency is
exempting deep wells from specified
methods and the dilution prohibition as
long as the characteristic is removed
before disposal
b. Dilution is considered to be an
acceptable method of treatment for non-
toxic characteristic wastes. Although
EPA proposed that the dilution
prohibition would cover all
characteristic wastes, the Agency
specifically noted that dilution might be
an acceptable type of treatment for non-
toxic characteristic wastes and solicited
comment on the issue. 54 FR 48498. After
considering the comments, the Agency
has determined that far non-toxic
hazardous characteristic wastes (/.a.,
wastes that exhibit a hazardous
physical or chemical property), it should
not matter how the non-toxic
characteristic property is removed so
long as it is removed. Thus, dilution is
an acceptable treatment method for
such wastes. (This issue Is discussed in
more detail in the sections on each
particular characteristic waste.). The
- Agency realizes that this approach does
not fully address the potential problem
of toxic constituents that may be present
in such wastes, nor encourages
minimtxation or recovery of non-toxic .
characteristic hazardous wastes. EPA '
has determined that these potential
problems should be addressed, if at aQ.-
-------
22668 Fa il Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
in other rulemakings (or potentially in a
reauthorized .statute) and ate too
difficult to resolve in this proceeding,
given die extraordinary pressures 4nd
limited review time imposed by the May
8 statutory deadline.
EPA also notes that it considers Ugh
TOC igni table nonwastewaters, reactive
cyanide wastes, and reactive sulfide
wastes to be toxic characteristic wastes.
As noted above, the high TOC igni tables
have been shown to frequently contain
high concentrations of organic toxicants.
Reactive cyanide and sulfide wastes
obviously contain toxic constituents.
Thus, dilution would not be an .
appropriate method of treatment for any
of these.
c. Determining when types of
treatment (including centralized
treatment) involving dilution an ¦
permissible. The Agency is able to
provide limited additional guidance
today on the issue of when treatment
¦methods involving dilution are
permissible. The issue frequently arises
when prohibited wastes are aggregated
for purposes of treatment. Firsts if the
wastes are all legitimately amenable to
the same type of treatment, and this
method of treatment is utilized for the
aggregated wastes, die aggregation step
is not impermissible dilution. Thus, it is
permissible (mid normally desirable) for
that are suitable for combustion to be
aggregated before combustion even
though the concentration of organics in
some of the wastes decreases. (See, for
example, the discussion for wastes
K04B-52.) On the other hand, as noted
above,aggregation of high "fOC
igni table wastes with igni table
wastewaters for centralized biological
treatment is not permissible. Biological
treatment is inappropriate for die high
TOC ignitable wastes, and the
aggregation step merely dilutes the high
TOC stream.
As noted above, EPA is unable to
quantify across-the-board what types of
treatment are appropriate for particular
prohibited hazardous wastes (both
listed and characteristic). Clearly, as
stated at proposal, units would have to
be doing some treatment (Ae, removing
toxicity or mobility of BOAT
constituents). In addition, treatment
units would have to be treating wastes
that are amenable to treatment in that
type of unit or by that type of treatment,
or, in die case of centralized treatment
units treating aggregated wastes, .
appropriately combining wastes for
common treatment An example of type
of treatment that is inappropriate for
treatment of certain prohibited wastes
would be biological treatment systems
used to treat prohibited wastes having,
treatment standards for metals.' In these
systems, metal removal is incidental and
nowhere as efficient as systems
designed to treat metals; biological
treatment systems are designed solely
for organic treatment (EPA notes, -
however, that since it is not applying
dilution rules for most characteristic
wastewaters, the above example would
only apply in cases-when a listed
prohibited metal-bearing wastewater—a
wastewater with treatment standards
for metals—was being treated in a
biological treatment unit If this
hypothetical biological treatment were a
surface impoundment EPA would not
view it as satisfying the requirement of
section 3005(j)(ll) and 8 268.4 that it be
conducting "treatment" See discussion
at 52 FR 25778-79 (July 8,1987) where
EPA determined in an analogous
rtiffiim«t
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June-1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22867
¦BBRI
biological treatment to be an
appropriate mode of treating metal*
bearing toxic wastes (£e.y wastes for
which there are treatment standards for
inorganic hazardous constituents). Any
metal removal is incidental because the
treatment technology is not designed to -
remove metals. In addition, removals
are at a rate that is considerably less
efficient than couldbe achieved by . .
• chemical precipitation or other forms of
wastewater treatment Thus, in the
example, dilution would be used as a
substitute for treatment of the listed
waste and would therefore be illegal
dilution and not treatment (See 54 FR
38968 (Sept & 1989) (dilution prohibition
applies to wastes managed in section
288.4 impoundments).)
- d. Facility D generates an EP toxic
nonwastewater that.it stabilizes to meet
the treatment standard. The waste's
volume increases 400 per rant as a result
of stabilization.
Althoughthere are too.few facts in .
this example to give a definitive answer,
-	normally this large an increase in waste :
volume would indicate that the
treatment standard is being achieved as
a result of dilution rather than
treatment, and therefore would be .
impermissible. :
H. Applicability of Today's Final Rule
to Mineral Processing Wastes
Section 3001(bj(3)(A)(ii) of RCRA
excludes from the hazardous waste
regulations (pending completion of
studies by this Agency) solid wastes
from the extraction, benefidation and
processing of ores and minerals. On
•-September-1,1989, EPA published a final
rule (54 FR 38592) that narrowed the
scope of this exclusion for 25
enumerated wastes that meet the
exclusion criteria of "high volume/low
hazard," as specified in the September 1
rule. EPA determined that five specific
mineral processing wastes clearly
remain within the scope of the -
exclusion, and 20 additional specified
mineral processing wastes remain
within the exclusion pending collection
of further volume and hazard data. All
previously excluded mineral processing
wastes, other than these 25 specified
wastes, that exhibit one or more of the -
characteristics of hazardous waste will~
no longer be excluded from the
hazardous waste regulations when the
final rule became effective on March l;
1999. On january 23,1990 (Bee 55 FR-
2322-2354), EPA published another final .
-	rule removing an additional five of these
wastes from the exclusion based on- ¦
additional volume and/or hazard data. ,
This final rule becomes effective on July
23.1990.
EPA believes that these previously,
excluded wastes are "newly identified'*
for the purpose of determining
applicability of the land disposal
prohibitiona Although technically the
wastes are not being identified by a new
characteristic, they are being brought
into the Subtitle C system after die
November 8,1984 enactment of HSWA. s
A permissible interpretation of RCRA
section 3004(g)(4), which is ambiguous
as to whether it applies to wastes first
brought into the Subtitle C system after
1984 due to regulatory re-interpretation,
is that wastes brought into the system
after the 1984 RCRA amendments may
be prohibited from land disposal under a
different schedule than those wastes
that were hazardous on the date of
enactment of HSWA, and also are not
subject to the statutory hard hammer.
The policy reasons for preferring this
interpretation are those that prompted
Congress to.establish a separate
prohibition schedule for other newly
identified and listed wastes: the need to
study such wastes separately, and
prioritization of hnrnmpr dates.
Consequently, because these wastes are.
considered to be newly identified, the
Agency must develop treatment
standards for them within six months of
their be ins identified as hazardous
wastes (RCRA section 3O04(g)(4)(q).
However, as stated above, these
wastes are hazardous because they
exhibit one or more of the
characteristics of hazardous waste.
Today's.rule promulgates treatment
standards for characteristic wastes. A
question, therefore, is whether the
treatment standards for characteristics
should apply to these mineral processing
wastes recently determined not to fall
withinthe Bevill exclusion. Put another
way, although as newly identified
wastes they are not subject to the hard
hammer. EPA has the choice of whether
to apply the treatment standards for
characteristic Wastes to them at tills
Hmn	-
The Agency has not yet performed the
technical analyses necessary to
determine if the treatment standards
promulgated today as BOAT for EP toxic
hazardous wastes or other characteristic
hazardous wastes can be achieved In
treating the various mineral processing
wastes. Therefore, EPA has determined
that these newly identified mineral
processing wastes am not subject to the
' BDAT standards promulgated today for
characteristic hazardous wastes. The
Agency plans to study the mineral
processing wastes in the future to
determine BDAT for these newly
identified hazardous wastes.
There are circumstances when newly
identified mineral processing wastes
can, however, be subject to existing
hazardous'waste prohibitions. In
particular, if the mineral processing
waste is mixed with other prohibited
wastes [Lsh any prohibited solvent
dioxin. First or Second Third hazardous
waste), it becomes subject to the
prohibition for the prohibited waste with
which it is mixed EPA also solicited
comment on applicability of California
list prohibitions, but has determined that
these prohibitions will not apply. See
section IILF for a discussion of this
issue.
Whether any of these prohibitions
would have immediate regulatory effect
would be determined by the
authorization status of the State in
which the waste is managed Because
the final rules removing wastes from the
scope of the Bevill exclusion are not
being adopted pursuant to HSWA, they
do not take effect immediately in
authorized States. Thus, in these States,
these mineral processing wastes would
only be hazardous wastes if they are
included within the scope of the State's
authorized program. If they are not they
would not be hazardous wastes until an
amended State's program including them
is authorized Only after authorization
would the land disposal prohibitions
apply in that State. These mineral
processing wastes would be hazardous
wastes in unauthorized States as soon
as the rule removing them from the
exclusion becomes effective. At that
time, any land disposal prohibitions that
apply to them also would take effect
The Agency, in the proposed rule,
solicited comment on whether the BDAT
treatment standards proposed for theEP
toxic metals are appropriate for the
newly identified mineral processing
wastes. Of the comments received,
almost all supported EPA's position that
the mineral processing wastes are
sufficiently different from other
characteristic wastes to warrant
additional analysis, and that the
statutory lia»nnn»i> and the California list
prohibitions apply only to those wastes
regulated as hazardous at the time of the
HSWA enactment
Several co mm enters argued against
die Agency's position on mineral
processing wastes. One commenter
stated that since EPA has extensive
information available from the listing
process, that should be sufficient to
develop BDAT treatment standards.
However, data collected and analyzed
for the purpose of listing a waste as
hazardous are different from those
required to perform BDAT analyses, 'n
addition, most of the analyses
-------
22868
Fbces^ B&gfoter / YoL 5Si No. 10S^ Friday. June 1. 19SX) / Rules and Regulations
performed have bee« to-determine if the
the scope of tha Itevill Amendment f&o.
high votaine/law hazard). Thu& the
Agenep does not agree: thatiehaa
anfRHpnt Aria harfatwrmtnwBPAT
wastes.
questiensioa whether tfan actual
treatment stMidards §K«wtheactaak
number or method) must be placed on
the generator notification form* as If it is.
aiiffirfpTrt' fn wrfpwiiiiai- ~>»» appropriate
applicable part of 4B CFR 28S.41. .42; or
.43. EPA's hrtefpretatifln las baeiii thai
regulation is the fial place by miltegal
interpratatitni o£ tha BaviH: Amenrfimat
in!980;saahaukinntbe considered
newly identified at this time. The
Agency disagrees' with; the- eo mm enter
that mineral processing wastes naimn>
be contiduedaewlv identified waatesi
Thesa wastes have become subject to
the subtitle C regulations subsequent t&
the enactment of HSW A. and thus need
not be subject ta the hard hammer mn
mnst trpgtmont ntfindllHf) fffll
characteristic-hazardous wastes ba
applied til them in this rale malting.
Certainly thera is sa indication ia either
-the statute astha legislative history that
in creating, a, O&moath deadline for
characteristicwaates. Congress
expected the Agency to address wastes
wilhin the scope of the Bevili
Amendment at tha time.of HSWA's;
promulgation-
I. Generator Notification Requirements
The generator notification
requirements sat forth ih 4(T CFR 288.7
specify t&atwften the generator has
determined, either through testingor
through knowledge of the waste, that die
waste is restricted and does not meet
the applicable treatment standards, the
generator mustwith each shipment of .
wastes notifir the treatment huffily fa
writing of the applicable treatment
standards and prohibition levels. Thisr
notice must include the EPA Hazardous
Waste Number, the corresponding
treatment standards andall applicable
prohibitions'set forth &r40 CPS 28&32or
RCRA section KWHdJ, the manifest
number associated with the shipment of
waste* and waste analysis data, where
available (40 CFR 288.7fa)fl)); If the
generator has1 determmed that the waste
being shipped is res«cte<£ but can be
land efisposed without ffethertreatment
the generator must submit to> the land
be listed comptotaly oiv the generator
notification fonnaentta the; treatment
stosagB'or disposal fadlity. Amanhnt of
indicated thai they be&eve tha euneot
regulations, can be interpreted ta allow
referencing rather than Hating tha
specific, treatment standards as pact of
the gpnecatee ootificatiaiLTha
commentets argued that referencing, tha
standards serves the same purpose, as
listing the specific treatment standards*
Furthermore, they stated that tha
notification forma are. becoming frwigpr,
more complicated,, and unwieldy as new
wastes and	twatmmt
standards are addidtathe Bat of wastes
restricted from land dlsposat and thus
Hating parti treatment atnrufnrrt nn thn
notification form, imposes an.
unnecessary burden on generators.
As proposed in tha Third Third notice
on November 22; 1989. [54 FR48438% the
Agency today is amending 40 CFR.2847
to allei* referencing tha Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR} rather than Bating,
each treatment standard. EPA solicited
comment in the Third Third proposed
rule on this action to determine if the
regulated community anticipated any
problems with referencing of the CFR,
and (0 determine the effect this action
would have on hazardous waste
generators. The comments EPS received
os the proposal were overwhefntingiyni
favor of allowing referencing the CFR.
Commenters stated that this action will
nigptfjpjinily wwliwm the paperwork
involved in handling the waste
as well as s certification stating thai the
waste meets tile applicable treatment
standards (40s CFR 288Jt&RZ}£- (ERA
reiterates that such dbtermfeatftm must
of course, be-accurate. Thtw, failure tc
accurately dafennMe a* wasted statne am
res&icted isa viokrtfrm of §2B8Jt (h)(1)!
or (a] (2), as weB as a
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 108 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22669
die agreement to apprise the subsequent
frnnriw 0f the land disposal restrictions
applicable to the waste.
/. Waste Analysis Plans and Treatment/
Disposal Facility Testily Requirements
In the proposed rule, EPAnoted that
9 9 288J(b) and (c) currently require
treatment and'disposal facilities to test
their wastes in order to ensure that they
are in compliance with applicable
treatment standards and prohibition
levels. EPA also noted that these
provisions require such testing to be
performed according tor the frequency
specified in the facility's S 284.13 or
§ 285.13 Waste Analysis Plan (WAP).
Although 9 9 284.13 and 285.13 require
that waste analyses contain enough
information to allow the owner/operator
to comply with die 40 CFR 288
requirements, die Agency noted that a
comment found in both of these sections
has created implementation problems.
The comment states, "the owner or
operator of an off-site (treatment
storage, or disposal) facility may
arrange for the generator of the
hazardous waste to supply part or all of
Ihe (waste analysis) information." This
language has been construed
erroneously as precluding EPA (or an
authorized State] from requiring the
owner/operator to conduct a detailed.
chemical and physical analysis of the
waste where the generator has supplied
the owner/opera tor with such waste
analysis information. Although EPA' -
stated in the proposal that it has
authority to require owner/operators to
" "test their wastes in such cases, the -
Agency stated its preference for
removing any ambiguities and modifying
die regulations in order to clarify EPA's
intent -
The Agency noted in the proposal its
belief that ordinarily, treatment and -
disposal facilities should do some
corroborative testing to ensure
compliance with LOR treatment
standards and prohibitions. Although
thereare certainly situations where test
data submitted by the generator. or the
knowledge of the generator, may
constitute an essential part of the
necessary information, EPA's proposal
was premised on a need to ensure that
the IJDR requirements are met prior to '
disposal. The Agency also noted that
such corroborative testing provides
records that may be useful in
ascertaining compliance with LDR
- requriements. Thus, EPA stated that
treatment and disposal facilities
normally should do periodic
independent corroborative testing of -
prohibited wastes, even if the generator
also tests the waste or otherwise
certifies 1hat it is eligible for land
disposal.
Given this context the Agency
proposed two approaches for specifying
the circumstances under which EPA
could require corroborative testing. Hie
first approach would allow off-site
facilities to arrange for the generator
and/or treater of wastes to supply all or
part of the waste analysis information
only if an EPA-approved WAP
affirmatively allows the generator and/
or treater to supply this information.
Since Interim status facilities do not
have their WAPs approved until their
permit applications are reviewed by
EPA (or the authorised State), such
facilities would no longer be able to rely
upon generator data under this
approach. Under the second approach,
the Regional Administrator or his
designate would determine the owner/
operator's testing frequency, but such
facilities would be required to conduct
waste analyses at least once a year.'
Since such an approach would be self-
implementing, no revisions to existing
permits would be necessary.
Numerous commenters pointed out
the advantages and disadvantages of
both approaches. The primary issues
raised by commenters related to the
flexibility and resources associated with
the proposed approaches. Several
commenters supported die flexibility
that the first approach would provide.
Individual facility circumstances can be
considered, which the commenter,
believed would result in appropriate
testing frequencies. The Agency agrees
with the commenters and continues to
believe that the frequency of testing is
best determined on a case-by-case basis
by the permit writer. This is because the
range of variables (eg* variety of
wastes managed, different types of
waste matrices, number of processes
invovled) is too broad to justify a single
national testing frequency. However,
evaluating the appropriate testing
' frequencies for every treatment and
disposal facility can be very resource-
intensive, a task that likely would take
several years to complete. Some
commenters expressed a preference for
specific minimum testing frequencies, in
part to establish a baseline level from
which to depart As stated above, a
required testing frequency is difficult to
specify for all facilities, and would be
excessive and redundant in some
situations while not being protective
enough in others. To address this
. problem, die Agency is developing
guidance to help identify what testing
frequency, based on site-specific
considerations, is reasonable and .
appropriate for treatment and disposal
facilities.
Several commenters stated that
corroborative testing by treatment and
disposal facilities is unnecessary where
generators supply such waste analysis
data. Some of these commenters felt that
testing should be required only where
the generator does not supply testing
data (/&, where the generator supplies
waste characterization data based only
on his knowledge of the waste or waste
generation process). EPA disagrees with
the commenters, and notes that the D.C.
Circuit in upholding EPA's 9 2847
testing framework, has expressed its
support for treatment and disposal
facility corroborative testing
requirements:
P)t ia the treatment facility's job to
transform waste otherwise deemed too
dangerous to permit into lanHfllU into
acceptable form. It is therefore not irrational
for the EPA to introduce a backup, arguably
"redundant" testing stage for these wastes
requiring treatment and even to consider this
a "critical" stage in the process.
888 F^d at 37a
The court also noted that such
corroborative testing is necessary for
dispoasl facilities:.
DJust prior to land disposal, waste must be
vigorously tested to confirm that it l» what
outers have represented it to be and that it
may permissibly be land disposed.
Id
Given these concerns, the Agency
today is promulgating an approach that
combines elements of both die proposed
approaches. EPA is revising the
comment in 99 284.13 and 285.13 to
implement this approach.
Under the final approach, treatment
and disposal facilities may generally
rely on information provided to them by
generators or treaters of the waste.
However, treatment and disposal
facilities must conduct periodic detailed
physical and chemical analysis on their
waste streams to assure that the
appropriate part 288 treatment
standards are being met Specifically,
today's final rule amends the comment
in 99 284.13 and 285.13 to make it clear
that the restricted waste testing
requirement (or other frequency
approved by the Agency) is not
superseded by the ability of the facility
to rely on information supplied by the
generator or treater. Also, with today's
change, 9 284.13 more clearly specifies
that EPA may, through the permit
require the owner or generator of a
treatment or disposal facility to conduct
periodic chemical and physical analysis
prior to treatment or other management
of wastes.
-------
22636	Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 10ft / Friday, fuag 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Interim sfetes£uuittes are subject to
the testing requirement for restricted
wastes. Interim status waste analysis
plana are developed by the facility and
maintained onrsiteh in accocdanee with
getf-impLementing procedures of
§ 2fi5il& Therefore, Interim atatua
facility owners ta operators should
ensure that thafe plan conforms wife
today's new requirement. E« example.
If tfca faaUU£a plan specifies total
reliance oa general or or heater-
provided tnfoiniatfant then the plan will
likely need to change ta reqpfra
appropriate testing {geeflacassfon
below regarding general Agpscy waste
testing eonaideratianB}>. Aisoi interim,
status facilities should update their
pending permit applications promptly to
ensure that the applications reflect the
most current information and today's
revisediegilatery requirements.
I£ a permitted facility wants to mnend
Its WAP to better address restricted
waste testing requirements* then tt
would follow the purirfl modification
procedures is f 27042 Under those1
modification procedures, a change, ta
indicate a different testing frequency
wouldmost Hkelyba. & Class Z
modification (see appendix I ta 9 270.42.
item B(l)).
EPA believes that tftere wiB be
sufficient tfine to incorporate
appropriatewaste analysis
requirements into the development of
permits for the approximately 1000
Interim tluliw IwuliiwiitiMiArfmap
facilities expected! to reeefeteRGRA
pemrfteia the next several yean. WAPs
fQf.P0RI)ittBO	wi" tE8ftbD8B(
facilities (inrftidhrg jngfrmratora) wilt be
examined no later than at permit
reissuance. Reevaluates of land
disposal facility permits wiH occur no
lata than the five yeac-permit review
required by 5 ^ttSOldk so WAP changes
can be accomplished atthsttime.lt
should also btt noted thai Jot permitted
facilities* EPA may address selected
WAPs eariier than the above timeframes
by using its general audmrity to reopen
permits whennew standards or
rpgi>lptiom» Ham* hgor* pmwmtyiftixi
(5270.4lCaK3)lv
For both permitted and frrterim states'
hrilititw, tits Agency retains its
. authority (particularly where-aravtsed
WAP has net been Agency-approved} ta
determine thaft, based on an inspection
or otha information the testing:
frequencies and/os protocols ae
inadequate at a particular fadlitjR. ta
such causkERfefarananthnriied State)
buinstih&BedUvterndnatingiaB
modifiying a facility's permit ar pursuing
an enforcement action.
In ordbr to afd permit writers and tns
regulated community in determining the
appropriate testingfrequencies-atbeth .
stages in time, the Agency expects ta
issue guidance soon which will further
address, these issues.
K. Testing of Waatca Treated in 90-Day
TmtfQFOmtamm
As noted In the November 2£ 198?
proposal treatment of prohfMed wastes
canductedin so-called SOdaytanfts (or
containers) regpbfed under } 2623* is
not presently subjectta-a waste analysts:
plan requirement 54 HI 46497..Thus,
there Es no regulatory vehicle for
determining testing frequency fa aucff
circumstances. In contrast under
7	288.7(bX treatment facilities treating
prohibited hazardous wastes must test ~
the treatment residBes that they
generate at a frequency determined by
their waste analysis pbm. ia aider to
flUfflttelB mmpllanwi arfth ^
nppHgnhhr twnrtnwinlritmrfwifa. Att
twwhwmli fartHH»» operating pmmiait*
to interim status or a full permit most.
have a waste analysis plan.
Therefore, to order to dose this
regulatory gap. EPA proposed thai
generators treating prohibited wastes in
8	28234 tanks and containers must
prepare a plan, justifying tha frequency
of testing they choose to adopt (54 FH
48497J. EPA disagrees with several
fyimTnoirtnro who contended thai
sufficient retaliatory mechanismsare
already in place for these units. Mast ¦
importantly, there fs no regulation at att
addressing testing frequency. Since a
substantial volume of hazardous waste
is treated fix these units* the issue of
testfngfrequency is viewed by the
Agency as Important for ensuring the -
integrity of the section 3004fm)
treatment standards. Furthermore,
today's imposition of a waste analysis
plan requirement—addressing, among
other issues testing, frequency—on
persons treating to 90-day tanks is
consistent wftb the Agency's
determination in the Solvents and
Dioxins final rufe that generators who
alsa treat must assume-the ssne
responsibilities as> off-site treeterfc See
51FR 40597); Put {mother way, EPA
beBeveetfcrt persons treating prohibited
wastes should ort&isily have the same
recosdbocpfag and deoanentatioB
responsibilitfos. whether the treatment
occurs off-site or to 9»duy tanks.
Tbeefarev in. todays final rnle^ the
Agency ia promulgating U» proposed
action with sevosd modifications in -
8 268.7(a)(4): in addition to the
modifications |md inaceariaace with
majority qf coi amenta)* the Agency ta
clarifying thai only generators treating
wastes ta comply with the applicable
RtlAT h»atm«nt KfamhwU four opposed
to wastes treated partially but receiving
further off-site treatment before meeting
the treatment standard}, are subject to
the new requirement toprepara a waste
analysis plan. Specifically, generators
treating prohibited wastes in 9 28234
tanks and contalaers to meet the
applicable BDAT treatment standard
mast prepare a plan detailing the
frequency of testing that is to be
conducted. The plan is to be justified on
detailed chemical and physical analysis
of a representative sample of the
prohibited wasfe(s) being treated and
must contain alt information necessary
to treat the waste(s) in accordance with
requirements of part 268 [see SS 264.1?
and fflff.13. from which these
substantive requirements are drawn)*
including.tha selected testing frequency.
Bvnmpla« of factors EPA would expect
to be included in the plan are:
discussion of the number of prohibited
wastes treated* thdr variability, and the
variability of the treatment process. See
section ILL) of today's preamble for more
detailed information on factors ta
include in the plan*
EPA does not believe however, that it
needs to reqpire waste analysis plans
from 90-day generators who treat
partially, but do not treat to achieve the
treatment standard. Such a requirement
would duplicate waste analysis plans of
the ultimate treatment facility. The
requirement that EPA is adopting today
is meant to dose an outright regulatory
gap which exists only when the 90-day
generator ia tha sole treater.
The plan will be self-implementing in
the sense that there is- no- requirement of
prior approval from any regulatory
entity; There is* however, a requirement
that the plan be retained as a facility
record, where it serves as the means of
justifying to enforcement officials why
the ftequency of testing, selected by the
facility is reasonable. Furthermore; aa
suggested by several commenters, this
plan should be filed with the EPA
Regional office or State within 30 days,
prior to the activity by some mechanism
that can verify delivery {e.g., return
receipt requested Federal Express; or
messenger). This provision wiB allow
the Agency or State an opportunity to
review the testing plan established. EPA
notes, however, that it reserves the right
at any subsequent time ta disapprove of
the testing plan. This review mei&amsm
should ease one commenter's concerns
about these ptan& befng self-
implementing and not subject to
regulatory review.
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
L Clarification of "P" and "If Solid
Wastes
1.	.Residues Remaining in Containers or
Inner Linen
In the November 22,1989 proposal,
EPA proposed several amendments to
clarify die existing language of 40. CFR
26133. The first amendment involved 40
CFR 28133(c), a provision that Eats
residue* remaining in containers or in
an inner liner that have held commercial
chemicd products listed in 40 CFR
281.33(e)j EPA believes that this
language was partially tnenor as it '
does not include residues remaining hi
mnUHnpw f»r in an tnnur tfnpr ¦
contaminated with the40€PR:26L33(f)
materials. All of the other provisions fa
40 CFR 281.33 refer ta both 40 CFR
26133 (e) and (f) wastes, and there is no
reason that 40 CFR 281.33(c) should not
as welL The omission results in fact
from an oversight, and is not based an
anychoice by the Agency.
Many commenters misunderstood the
Agency's intent by this clarification. It
was not our intent to subject WIT wastes
(La, non*acute l"'"*"* wastes) to the
triple-rinsing requirements of 40 CFR
2617(b)(3) as this section applies solely
to acute hazardous wastes. In 40 CFR
261-33(c), there is not a corresponding
reference, however, that residues
remaining In containers or in an inner
liner contaminated with "U" wastes are
subjectto regulation, unless empty as
defined in 40 CFR 2617{br)(l). TWs
omission could be read as allowing the
disposal of full containers of "U" Bsted
wastes. While this would dearly be an
incorrect reading, today's find action
corrects thisonrisskm. - . --
2.	SpiH Residues
In add&an, ERA proposed a clarifying
amendment to 40 CFR 26133(4 to be
codffied in 40 CFR 261.2 (b) and{c) to
state that residues of spills of
pnmwayrlal rlwmtral pmAirft tttlnH Jq
40 CFR 26133(e) and ffl-wiO be ¦
considered solid wastes if they are not
recycled witidnDO days of the spilL 54
FR 48493-94. The Agency's rationale
Was thflf fllthniiflh «irhnpiIloH matwHala
may be considered to be "abandoned"
under the existing regulatory language,
it might be more appropriate to establish
a specific tfcne period after which such
spills became solid wastes. Hie Agency
noted further that it ordinarily views
spilled commercial chemicals as solid
wastes becanse^he nature of a spill ¦
constitutes disposal, and because of the
difficulty of recycling spill residues in
such matrices as sofl or groundwater. Id.
In these instances, not eoly are spill
residues of commercial chemical
products unlike«ther40 CFR 28133 '
materialmen off-specification
products), but the Agency believes that
marginal claims ofrecyclability could be
asserted to avoid proper cleanup of
spills. &
While comments on this issue were
mixed, a number of commenters made
the point that this issue was
inappropriate for determination in the
Third Third rulemaking because it is not
directly related to the Land Disposal
Restrictions program. Given that these
comments have merit and considering
rtn miwhiBi nf hrniw that, rnnttt ho
decided undarthe pressing timetable
imposed by the statute, the Agency will
not go forward with the quantified
standard thatit proposed. ¦
Furthermore, the Agency believes that
this Issue can be addressed by
interpretation of existing regulations.
Under 40 CFR 26133, mere assertion of
intent to recycle a spill residue of a
commercial chemical product does not
automntfawlly immunize the spiB area
from RCRA subtitle C jurisdiction. The
generator has die bprden of proving that
the spilled material is not a solid waste,
and a generalized assertion does "not
satisfy the burden. See 40 CFR 281.2(f). .
Objective considerations that could be
. pointed to to satisfy this burden include .
whether the generator has begun to
recyde the spiH residue,-die length of
time die spill residue has existed, die
value of the spilled material, whether it
to technically feasible or technically
practical to recycle the spiH residue, and
whether there is any past history of the
company recycling this type of residue.
EPA repeats that assertion of intent to
recycle does not satisfy the generator's
burden of prooL Rather, there must be
objective indicators of intent, and the
indicators must be strong given that a
spill of hazardous material to soil or
groundwater Is normally a simple act of
disposal.
3. De Minimis Exception to die Mixture
Rule
In die context of the Third Third
proposal, several commenters requested
clarification of the scope of the mixture
rule exemption to the definition of
hazardous waste under 40 CFR
281.3(a)(2)(lv}. Thisprovision exempts
mixtures which contain amounts
of listed spent solvents (T-iiatad
solvents") nt other de madnua losses of
commercial chemical wastes ("P and U
wastes") from manufacturing operations
when these listed wastes are mixed with
other wastewater "the	of
which is subject to regulation under
either section 402 or section 307(b) of the
Clean Water Act (including wastewater
at facilities that have eliminated the
discharge of wastewater)." **
Commenters raised the issue of whether
disposal of such noctures via Class I
UIC wells allows the facility to claim
this exemption. In particular,
commenters expressed concern that
recent EPA statements regarding the
scope of this exemption imply that large
volumes of wastewater will require
treatment of the P and U wastes within
the wastewater stream before injection
of a Class I well and that capacity for
treatment of such wastestreams is not
currently available.
Before responding to these comments,
some background information is in
order. RCRA subtitle C generally
regulates as hazardous all mixtures of
listed hazardous wastes and other solid
wastes. One exception from this rule is'
for mixtures that "consistQ of
wastewater the discharge of which is
subject to regulation under either
section 402 or 307(b) of the Clean Water
Act (Including wastewater at facilities
which have eliminated the discharge of
wastewater) and: [contain specific
amounts of listed solvents or de minimis
losses of discarded chemical products]."
40 CFR 281.3(a)(2)(iv). This exception to
the mixture rale was established by
regulation on November 17,1981. See 48
FR 56582. A specific level for spent
solvents is established by the regulation
(either 1 ppm or 25 ppm). The regulation
sets a worst-case maximum
concentration of solvent within the
wastewater stream; the actual
concentration will almost certainly be
less. Conversely, there is no set
regulatory concentration for de minimis
loss levels of P and U wastes that are
listed in 40 CFR 28133(e) and (f).
In the 1981 interim final rule, EPA did
not exempt all de minimis mixtures
generated at aO facilities. Rather, EPA
limited die exemption as follows: "[The
exemption] applies only to wastewater
mixtures managed in wastewater
treatment systems whose discharge is
subject to regulation under * ° * the
[CWA]. This requirement will help to
prevent indiscriminate discharge of
wastes into wastewater treatment
systems because to do so would
jeopardize the generator's ability to
comply with its [CWA] discharge
requirements. * * • (T)he Agency
•• The exemption also covers mixture* of small
amoenta of listed harvdooa waste* to wastewaters
resulting from laboratory operations. 40 CFR
281J(a)(2)(Iv)(E). Also, them is similar, but not
fatal Itari, language contained tea final nde that
provided intarpmatbms of ocrtaw terms and
provisions of standards Cor hazardoos waste tank
systems (S3 FR3M7SI September 2.1968). Today's
notice is not changing the applicability of the
September 2.1988 final rule with respect to
hazardous waste tank systems.
-------
22672 Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
means to include all facilities which	simply because they have an injection	At Storage Prohibition .
generate wastewater which is	well on site. . ,, 	^	M	¦ .
^wha^dinto surface water or into a	WCweUsiMy.hoi^.be^TO	that there are concerns with its existing
^	discharp-facmtiM,^ those which	interpretation of the statutory storage
include thoM facilities (known as ^nro	have eliminated thekdisdiarge. To	prohibition set out in section 3004{j] of
dischargers') that have eliminated the	qualify as such a facility, it must satisfy	RCRA. Section 3004(j) provides that
dlschaip of^astmtv asa result °t	the definition of a "zero discharge"	storage of prohibited hazardous waste is
or by exceeding (/.a* doing better than),	facility outlined In the November 17, .	itself prohibited "unless such storage is
NPDES or pretreatment program	1981 regulation. To repeat the language	solely for the purpose of the
requirements.'46 FR 56584 (Nov. 17,	from the 1981 preamble discussing that	nf
1981). -	provision, '**(t)he Agency * * 0 means	ha«^i« waste as are necessary to
Furthermore, the applicability of the	to include those facilities [known as	facilitate proper recovery, treatment or
mixture rule exemption for P and U	*xero dischargers') that have eliminated	Pr<"^pql cnn""'""
wastes was limited to the introduction	the discharge of wastewater as a result	some storage may be prohibited even
of these wastes into wastewaters "in the	of, or by exceeding. NPDES ot	- where it.is not being used with the
normal handling of these materials.	pretreatment program requirements." 46	intent to circumvent the land disposal
either as raw products used in the	FR 56584 (Nov. 17,1981) [emphasis	prohibitions, and whether the storage
manufacturing process or as	added]. Thus, a UIC well will certainly	prohibition should only apply if storage
intermediate or chemical products used	qualify as a zoo discharge facility if die	is used as surrogate disposal.
in or produced by the manufacturing	facility injects the wastewater to comply	. To fully evaluate then" conrems. the
process*n [emphasis added] 46 FR 56586,	with NPDES permit conditions or an	Agency requested comment on an
f-Artnln commenters assert that die	applicable CWA effluent guideline. A	alternative interpretation of 40 CFR
mixture rule exemption currently applies	well at a facility which is not "subject to	26&50. Under the alternative approach,
to wastewater disposed of in a UIC welL	(CWA) regulation" under an NPDES	storage of prohibited wastes in tanks or
Specifically, these commenters argue	permit or an effluent guideline is not	containers pending the utilization of
first that all injection wells dispose of	within the scope of the language of the	proper treatment, recovery or disposal -
wastewater "die discharge of which is	mixture rule exemption. EPA notes that	capacity would not be prohibited. EPA
subject to regulation [under the CWA]."	this interpretation is fully consistent	provided two examples of allowable
Second, commenters argue that UIC , with its 1981 preamble, and thus does	storage under this alternative approach:
wells perse constitute a method for	not constitute a "change" in	, (1) Where a generator is storing
facilities to "eliminate * * ,* the	interpretation,, as suggested by certain	wastes in tanks for six weeks because
discharge ofwastewater." Commenters	commenters.	of a backup at an incinerator which the
further suggest that wastewater disposal	EPA notes, that, as a practical matter,,	generator has a contract to use; and
via UIC wells should be exempted as	the facilities concerned about the scope	(2) Where a treatment facility treats a
consistent with the purposes for the	of the mixture rule exemption are likely	prohibited waste to a level that does not
exemption expressed by EPA, L&, that	unaffected by today's clarification. Most	meet the treatment standard and then
such wastewater mixed with de minimis	of these facilities are, in fact in an	stores the waste before treating it again
levels of listed wastes are adequately , industry .category (organic chemicals)	. to meet the standard,
regulated by another statute. These	whose facilities are "subject to	EPA recognized in the proposal that
commenters express their belief that	regulation" under section 402 by virture	under die alternative approach, the
disposal o£ such mixtures down UIC	of the effluent guideline for that	phrase "utilization of proper treatment
wells would be-adequately controlled	category. See 40 CFR- part 414 (1989).	recovery or disposal capacity" needed
under the UIC regulations, and that	Thus, EPA does not believe that there	to be further defined. The Agency also
Injection was the environmentally sound - will be a problem with treatment	sought further comment on how a
method of disposal for these	capacity for P and U. wastes, because	temporal element might be added to the
wastewaters.	most wastewaters containing de	' phrase "pending the utilization * * *"
EPA does not agree completely with	minimis amounts of P and U wastes	in order to define the limits of the
the commenters' analysis of the scope of - now being injected are not hazardous	proposed approach. Commenters were
the mixture rule exemption. First	waste now being injected are not	also asked to address other potential
. injection of a fluid in a UIC well is not a	hazardous waste and will be unaffected	situations where they believed that an
"discharge" within the meaning of die	by today's rule. Nonetheless, EPA	overly literal reading of 3004{j) may
CWA. Injection wells can, in	wishes to caution such facilities that the	have consequences they believe
appropriate instances, constitute a	mixture rule exemption does not	Congress did not intend
practice which has "eliminated the	constitute a license to mix collected .	Many of the commenters supported
discharge of wastewater," but these	volumes of E, P, or U wastes into a	. the proposed broadening of the
instances must be evaluated on a case-	treated wastewater stream and then	allowable bases for storing prohibited
by-case basis. As the regulation states,	inject such, a stream. As EPA clearly	wastes. However, the commenters did
the issue is whether the "discharge" is	stated in 1981,the exemption is	nnt nffer nparffip. wnAnhln «ngy>aHnna
subject to section 402 or 307(b) of the*	designed to cover situations where	for defining tnrma mirh an "ponding"
CWA, not whether the facility is	¦ "variousspills or incidental losses" of	and "proper", as EPA noted was
-"subject to regulation" under section	solvents or commercial chemicals are	necessary. Without objective criteria for
402. A UIC welL whether or not the state "reasonably and efficiently managed by	defining the limits of allowable storage,
adopts ite regulations under 402(d)	being discharged into a plant's	EPA believes that the proposed'
addressing such a well, ianot a CWA • wastewater treatment system." 48 FR	reinterpretation will be very difficult to
discharge point Thus, facilities with ' 56584. EPA clearly did not assume that	implement and enforce. For example;
wells for injection of wastewater do not	facilities would attempt to avoid	does it matter how far in the future—
fall within the mixture rule exemption	treatment of such wastes.	five years, two years, six months—
-------
Federal-Register / VoL 55. No. 108 / Friday, Jane 1. 1980 / Rules and Regulations	22S73
proper treatment might be utilized? Must
there be a contract with a treatment
company? What if it is contingent or
contains option provisions? l^us, the
Agency is instead retaining its
longstanding interpretation of die
storage prohibition and is not finalising
the proposed alternative approach.
Under die existing approach, both
RCRA 3004Q)-and 40 €FR288£0 provide
that storage of prohibited hazardous
wastes Is itself prohibited ftmless ?uch
storage to solely for the purpose of the'
accumulation of such quantities of
hazardous waste as an necessary to
facilitate praperiecovery,' treatment or
disposal." Storage of prohibited wastes
is only allowed In non-laud based
storage units (£&. tanks and containers),
since land-based storage is a type of
land disposaL
Two major principles underlie the
storage prohibition: (1)-the need to
reduce the risks created by long-term
storage; and (2) the goal of the Land
Disposal Restri ctions, and HSWA
generally, to encourage the expeditious
use of alternative treatment
technologies. CL Hazardoui Waste
. TreatmentCooadiv;EPA. 888F.2d.-355
(D.C. Or. Sept 15,1989) ITHWTCnr)
where the court said:
Congress believed 1hat permitting storage
of large quantities of waste as > means of
forestalling treatment wouki involve health
threats equally serioos to those posed by
land disposal, and therefore opted in larga
part for a "treat as jroago" regulatory regime.
888F^d at 357.
Mechanisms such as national capacity
variances and case-by-case extensions.
are intendedlo address situations where
there is a jack of treatment capacity.
No firm time limit is .established
pursuant to 4 288J0. Generators and
owners or operators can store as long as
necessary. The legislative history-makes
it clear that the intent of RCRA 3G04Q)
and 9288^0 is to prohibit use of long-
term storage to circumvent treatment
requirements imposed by the Land
Disposal Restrictions. 129 Cong. Rec.
H8139 (daily ed. Octobers, 1983).
However, if prohibited wastes are
stored beyond one year, the owner/
operator has the burden of proving {in
the event of an enforcement action] that
such storage Is for the allowable reason;
prior to one year, EPA maintains die
burden of proving that storage has
occurred for the wrong reason.
. Finally, EPA reemphasizes that intent
is not a critical factor in determining
liability. In order to successfully enforce
this provision, die Agency need not
demonstrate that those storing
prohibited wastes have a particular
state of mind Rather, objective factors
such as the type and amount of waste in
storage and the time in storage still may
be relied upon as the key factors in .
' interpreting this provision. In
determining whether storage is lawful
the Agency trill continue to evaluate
these factors in light of its "treat as you
go" approach noted in HWTCm. EPA
notes, however, that the intent ofthose
storing prohibited wastes may be
relevant in the Agency's determination
regarding what type of relief, if any, to
seek in a civil or criminal enforcement
action.
deadlines under other statutory
programs, are factors which are
affecting the management of mixed
waste. EPA will further evaluate the
legal, policy, and factual issues relevant
to this matter. Since this issue is not
material to the requirements which EPA
must promulgate in order io meet the
May 8,1990 Third Third rule statutory
deadline, EPA will resolve this matter
separately from this rulemaking. The
Agency expects to issue its policy on the
mixed waste storage issue during the
next 90 days.
1. Storage of RadioactHre Mixed Waste js. Case-by-Case Extensions
Several commenters urged the Agency
to modify its existing interpretation of
the section 3004(0 storage prohibition as
it relates to radioactive mixed waste.
Mixed waste contains both a hazardous
waste component subject to RCRA
hazardous waste management
standards and a radioactive waste
component regulated under the Atomic
Energy Act tAEA). He commenters
asserted that there Is little or no
available permitted treatment or
disposal capacity for commercially
generated mixed waste, and that many
of these mixed wastes contain spent
solvents or California list wastes that
are not eligible for the national capacity
variance which EPA is granting for
mixed waste containing first second,
and third-third wastes. The commenters
emphasized that generators have no
practical Option rat to store their
prohibited mixed waste on-site, pending
the availability of treatment and
disposal capacity. The commenters .
stated that die Agency should not
interpret such storage as "surrogate
disposal" that violates section 3004(j),
since this feoterpretation would result in
a requirement allowing no possibility of
compliance by generators. The
commenters further asserted that
interpreting section 3004Q) in this
manner could give rise to an
inconsistency with the AEA, within the
meaning of RCRA section 1008(a).
EPA is aware of die difficulties posed
by the applicability of the section 3004(j]
storage prohibition to mixed wastes
under circumstances where there fa no
treatment or disposal capacity. These
issues and their effects on certain low-
level waste generators (e^, hospitals,
research institutions, universities], were
' also discussed at length in a recent
report developed by die Office of
Technology Assessment (OTA). (See
"Partnerships Under Pressure, Managing
Commercial Low-level Radioactive
Waste." OTA, November 1089).
EPA acknowledges that the current
shortage of treatment or disposal
capacity, and the requirements and
Under RCRA Section 3004(h)(3), EPA
can grant case-by-case extensions of the
prohibition effective dates for up to one
year beyond the applicable deadlines;
extensions are renewable once for up to
one additional year. On November 7,
1988, EPA published a final rule (51FR
40572) establishing the regulatory
framework to implement the land
disposal restrictions program, including
the procedures for submitting case-by-
case petitions.
To obtain a case-by-case extension,
the statute requires that the applicant
make the following demonstrations:
(1)	A binding contractual commitment
has been made to construct or otherwise
provide alternative treatment recovery,
or disposal capacity that protects human
health and die environment81
(2)	Due to circumstances beyond his
or her control, such alternative capacity
cannot reasonably be made available by
the applicable effective date.
(3)	If a surface impoundment or
landfill is used by the applicant to
manage the waste during the extension
period, the unit must meet the
requirements of section 3004(o). EPA has
interpreted these statutory provisions to
also require the following (see 40 CFR
288.5(a)):
(1)	A good-faith effort must be made
to locate and contract with treatment
recovery, or disposal facilities
nationwide to manage the waste in
accordance with restrictions by the
applicable effective date.
(2)	The capacity being constructed or
otherwise provided will be sufficient to
manage the entire quantity of waste that
is the subject of the petition.
11 Section 3804(b)(3) refers to "such alternative
capacity," referring hack to Section 300t(hH2).
which speaks of "alternative treatment, recovery, at
disposal capacity which protect* human health and
the environment." For disposal capacity, EPA
Interpret this language to mean « no-migration untt
See Sections 3001 (d)(1), felfll. aad (gHS). For
treatment and recovery capacity, the lehienia
refers to capacity that satisfies the Section JOOWni)
standard.
-------
22874
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Roles and Regulations
(3)	A detailed schedule for obtaining
required operating and constructing
permits, or an outline of how and when
alternative capacity will be available.
(4)	Adequate capacity is available to
manage the waste during theextension
period, documenting in the petition the
location of all sites at which the waste
will be managed.
After an applicant has been granted a
case-by-case extension, the applicant
must notify the Administrator as Boon as
he or si^e has knowledge of any change
in the demonstrations made in the
petition. In addition, the applicant must
submit progress reports, at specified
intervals, that describe the progress
being made towards obtaining adequate
alternative capacity, identify any delay
or possible delay in developing die
capacity, and describe the mitigating
actions being taken in response to the -
event See 40 CFR 28&5 (i) and (g).
Hie Agency has received a number of
inquiries on whether a proposed no-
migration petition or proposed
treatability variance would satisfy the
first statutory requirement That is,
could a proposed no-migration variance
or a proposed treatability variance .
constitute the "alternative treatment, :
recovery, or disposal capacity." If so,
and if the Agency were to grant a case-
by-case extension, this could provide
petitioners with additional time while
their no-migration petition or treatability
variance is being considered for final ..
approval
First, it should be noted thattheT
amount of time required to process no-
migration and treatability variances (for
other than injected wastes] is expected
to be 12-18 months due to the
6omplexity of the technical .
demonstration^ that must be made, and
their subsequent evaluation. On the
other hand, the case-by-case petitions
generally can be processed in about 6-8
months because the required
demonstrations are more
straightforward This could give the
petitioner about 8 months of relief: Some
petitioners believe that there are a
number of legitimate circumstances
where the few extra months gained -
would make the difference between
dosing a facility which ultimately will
be granted a valid variance request and
keeping it in operation.
In response to these inquiries, EPA Is
taking this opportunity to clarify that the
statutory requirement to obtain a -
"binding contractual commitment to
construct or otherwise provide
alternative treatment recovery, or .
disposal capacity" may be satisfied by a
Federal Register notice wherein the
Agency proposes to grant either a no-
migration extension, or a treatability
variance. The Agency believes that
EPA's proposing to grant either a
treatability variance petition or a no-
migration petition is sufficient
demonstration that the petitioner has
made a good faith effort to commit to
obtaining altentative protective disposal
capacity; any further commitment is
solely contingent on EPA's action at this
point In addition, die Agency's action in
proposing to grant the variance petition
-serves as a partial imprimatur that the
alternative capacity under consideration
wiQ prove to be protective; However,
the mere filing of a variance petition
prbvides no such guarantee (most of the
no-migration petitions for surface units
filed to date, for example, have proven
. technically deficient), thus cannot -
be deemed to satisfy the statutory
requirement
Of course, should EPA then grant a
case-by-case extension, that grant
would be conditional: if EPA denies the
no-migration petition or die treatability
variance, then the basis for the case-by-
case extension may no longer exist and
the variance will be terminated unless
there is additional basis for the
variance. In addition, when die no-
migration or treatability variance is !
granted* the case-by-case extension
automatically expires (since it is no
longer needed).
Because significant time and.
resources would have been expended on
the case-by-case petition review
unnecessarily if the no-migration
petition or treatability variance is
ultimately denied, EPA will begin
review of a case-by-case extension
petition only after receiving a clear
indication that the Agency has the
intention of proposing to grant die no-
migration petition or treatability
variance (and will not propose to grant a
case-by-case extension unless the >
Agency has actually proposed'to grant
the variance). Conversely, when the
clear indication is that the no-migration
petition or treatability variance will be
denied, tPA will not review the case-by-
case petition,'and this petitioner will be
notified at die same time he or she is
notified of the status of the other
petition*'
O. Applicability of California List
Prohibitions after May 8,1990
In the November 22,1989 proposal,
EPA discussed two issues relating to
California list wastes. 54 FR 48498. The
first issue is die question of continued
applicability of California list
prohibitions to wastes which are .
granted a national capacity variance in
today's rulemaking. The second issue is
whether California list prohibitions
apply to wastes that are first identified
and listedafter die date of-the HSWA
amendments. 54 FR 48498-99.
EPA discussed die relationship of
California list prohibitions to scheduled
wastes subject to a capacity variance
(either national or case-by-case) in the
preamble to the First Third rule. 53 FR
31188. The Agency established in the
First Third rule that although specific
prohibitions and treatment standards
take precedence over California list
prohibitions, during die period of a
capacity variance the California list
prohibitions continue to apply. EPA
included this discussion in the Third
Third proposal not to reopen the issue
but to put persons on notice that the
same reading applies to Third Third
wastes, including characteristic wastes.
In fact the few commenters on the issue
indicated that they agreed with and
were aware of the Agency's position
The Agency did solicit comment
however, on whether it would be
permissible to reevaluate whether die
California list prohibitions for acid
corrosive wastes would apply during the
period of a national capacity variance
for Third Third add corrosive wastes
(which are identical substances). .
Several commenters suggested that the
prohibition for California list corrosives
should not apply to Third Third
corrosives that are granted national
capacity variances in today's
rulemaking. The Agency disagrees with
this assertion and believes that not
applying the more generally applicable
California list prohibitions as an interim
prohibition is contrary to the literal
statutory language and enundations of
Congressional intent in the legislative
history. See S. Rep. No. 284,98th Cong.
1st Sess. 17. Also, given the fact that
these wastes have been restricted since
July 8,1987. it is illogical that the
Agency would grant these wastes a
capacity extension in today's
rulemaking. Therefore, a corrosive
waste that is injected underground is at
a minimum subject to the California list
prohibitions on August 8,1990.
The other issue on which EPA
solidted comment is whether newly
identified or listed wastes could be
covered by California list prohibitions.
Most of the comments supported the
Agency's tentative condusion that the
statutory language does not compel a
reading that California list prohibitions
apply, and further supported the view
that California list prohibitions should
not apply. EPA is adopting that reading
ip today's rule. As the Agency noted at
proposal there would be massive
dislocations in the regulated community
if California list prohibitions were to
apply to newly identified and listed
-------
FederaTRegtotar / Vol 55. Na 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22675
wastes. For example, if wastes
identified by die new Toxicity
Characteristic were HOCa, thus
triggering immediate California list
prohibitions, there would be immediate
prohibitions of these wastes rather than
the more phased schedule specified in
section 3004(g)(4). EPA does not believe
this result is desirable. In addition, die
Agency believes that the better reading
of the statute is that the California list --
prohibitions were not meant to apply to
wastes that are newly identified or
listed. Consequently, EPA is determining
today that wastes that are newly
identified and listed 21 are prohibited
only when the Agency takes specific
action with regard to them pursuant to
section 3004(g)(4).
Since die California list prohibitions
are superseded by more specific
treatment standards (with the caveat
that the prohibitions continue to apply
during capacity variance periods as
discussed above) with the promulgation
of the Third Third final rule, almost all
of die California list prohibitions will be
superseded by more specific
prohibitions and treatment standards.**
The California list prohibitions remain
applicable for (1) liquid hazardous
wastes that contain-over 50 ppm PCBs;
(2) HOC-containing wastes identified as
hazardous by a characteristic property
that does not involve HOCs, as, for
example, an ignitable waste that also
contains greater than 1000 ppm HOCs
. (but not an EP toxic waste that exhibits
the characteristic because it contains
one of the six chlorinated organic
' pestiddercQvered by the EP toxicity
characteristic); and (3) liquid hazardous
wastes that exhibit a characteristic and
also contain over 134 mg/1 of nickel
and/or 130 mg/1 of thallium.
Finally, EPA proposed that it would
delete the provision-specifying burning -
in boilers and furnaces as a specified
method of treatment for California list
HOCs (existing S 288.42(a)(2)) because
there are virtually no situations to which
the provision could apply. 54 FR 48499.
There was virtually no comment on this
point and EPA is finalizing this action
as proposed for the reasons stated at
proposal
u Newjy Identified means either newly subject to
anodstinychaiacteristic (&&. snch si those wastes
removed from the Bevill exchtskm] or subject to »
new characteristic. Newly listed wastes may still be
subject to any preexisting applicable characteristic
standards or CatifbraJa list prohibitiona tfummfug
from the characteristic.
" See 52 FR 29993 lAugust 12.1987) and 52 FR.
23773 (July 8.1887); see also 40 CFR 2B8J2(h) (HOC
prohibition superseded by treatment standard and"
effective date for a particular HOC).
IV. State Authority
A. Applicability of Rules in Authorized
States
Under section 3008 of RCRA, EPA
may authorize qualified States to
administer and enforce the RCRA
program within die State. Following
authorization, EPA retains enforcement
authority under sections 3008,3013, and
7003 of RCRA, although authorized
States have primary enforcement
responsibility. The standards and
requirements for authorization are found
in 40 CFR part 271.
Prior to HSWA, a State with final
authorization administered its
hazardous waste program in lieu of EPA
administering the Federal program in
that State. The Federal requirements no
longer applied in the authorized State,
and EPA could hot issue permits for any
facilities that the State was authorized
to permit When new, more stringent
Federal requirements were promulgated
or enacted, the State was obliged to
enact equivalent authority within
specified time frames. New Federal
requirements did not take effect in an
authorized State until the State adopted
the requirements as State law.
In contrast under RCRA section
3008(g) (42 U.S.C. 6928(g)), new
requirements and prohibitions imposed
by HSWA take effect in authorized
States at the same time that they take
effect in nonauthorized States. EPA is
directed to carry out these requirements
and prohibitions in authorized States,
including the issuance of permits, until
theState is granted authorization to do
so. While States must still adoRj -
HSWA-related provisions as State law
to retain final authorization. HSWA
applies in authorized States in the
interim.
With one exception, today's final rule
is promulgated pursuant to sections 3004
(d) through (k), and (m), of RCRA (42
U&C. 8924 (d) through (k), and (m)).
Therefore, it will be added to Table 1 in
40 CFR 271.1(j), which identifies the
Federal program requirements that are
promulgated pursuant to HSWA and
take effect in all States, regardless of
their authorization status. States may
apply for either interim or final
authorization for the HSWA provisions
in Table 1, as discussed in the following
section. Table 2 in 40 CFR 271.1(j) will
also be modified to indicate that this
rule is a self-implementing provision of
HSWA.
The exception is the clarifying
amendment to $ 281.33(c). This
clarification is not effective in
authorized States since the requirements
are not imposed pursuant to HSWA.
Thus, these requirements will be
applicable only in those States that do
not have interim or final authorization.
In authorized States, the requirements
will not be applicable until the State
revises its program to adopt equivalent
requirements under State law.
B. Effect on State Authorizations
As noted above, EPA will implement
today's final rule in authorized States
until their programs are modified to
adopt these rales and the modification is
approved by EPA. Because the rule is
promulgated pursuant to HSWA, a State
submitting a program modification may
apply to receive either interim or final
authorization under RCRA section
3008(g)(2) or 3008(b), respectively, on the
basis of requirements that are
substantially equivalent or equivalent to
EPA's. Hie procedures and schedule for
State program modifications for either
interim or final authorization are
described in 40 CFR 271.21. It should be
noted that HSWA interim authorization
will expire on January 1,1993 (see 40
CFR 271.24(c)).
Section 27X21 (e)(2) requires that
States that have final authorization must
modify their programs to reflect Federal
program changes and must subsequently
submit the modification to EPA for
approval. Hie deadline by which the
State must modify its program to adopt
these regulations is July 1,1991, in
accordance with section 271.21(e). These
deadlines can be extended in certain
cases (see section 271.21(e)(3)). Once
EPA approves the modification, the
State requirements become subtitle C
RCRA requirements.
States with authorized RCRA
programs may already have
requirements similar to those in today's
rule. These State regulations have not
been assessed against the Federal
regulations being promulgated today to
determine whether they meet the tests
for authorization. Thus, a State is not
authorized to implement these
requirements in lieu of EPA until the
State program modification is approved.
Of course. States with existing
standards may continue to administer
and enforce their standards as a matter
of State law. In implementing the
Federal program, EPA will work with
States under agreements to minimize
duplication of efforts. In many cases,
EPA will be able to defer to the States in
their efforts to implement their programs
- rather than take separate actions under
Federal authority.
States that submit official applications
for final authorization less than 12
mouths after the effective date of these
regulations are not required to include
-------
2287B	Federal Register J Vol 55. Nol. 108 / Friday, June 1.1S90 / Bales and Regulations
standards equivalent to these
lpgwlmHmig hi Auto nppllrnHm.
However, the State mast modify its
program by the deadline set forth in
§ 27L21{e). States that submit official
applications far final authorisation 12
months after the effective date of these
regulations most include standards
equivalent to these regulations in fteir
application. The geqiriraimantsa state
most meet when submitting its final
authorization application an aetlorthin
40CF12?La.
The regulations tefeig promulgated
today need not affect the State's
linAnynn^ fnjnrtton fin»«*»nl pun)
primary status. A State currently
authorized to administer the UIC
program under the SafeDrinldng Water
Act (SDWA) could continue to da so
nHthn.it pooting anrti/wJIy
these amendments. However, a State
which wished to implement Part 148 and
receive authorization to grant
ermnptfona from the land disposal
restrictions would have to demonstrate
that it had the requisite authority to
administer sections 30D4(f) and (g} of . ¦
RCRA. The conditions under which such
an authorization may take place are
summarized below and are rflsraiBradin
a July 15.1985 final rule (50 FR 28728].
r tjfntn TinfJmnantatM,
The following four aspects of the
framework established in the November
7.1988, rale {51 PR 40S72) affect State
implementation of today's rale and
impact 0UW actions on too iBguiuuci
community:
1. Under part 288, subpartC, EPA is
, treaters. starets, and'
disposers of certain typas of hazMdous
waste. In order to retain authorization.
Stales mast adopt the regulations trader
year) may be granted for specific
evaluate. Therefore, States cannot be
authorized for this aspect of the
program.
3. Under } 288.44, the Agency may
grant waste-specific variances from
treatment standards ia cases where it
can be demonstrated tht the physical
and/or chemical properties of the
wastes differ significantly from wastes
analyzed in devekspteg the treatment
standards, and the wastes cannot be -
treated to specified levels or Seated by
. can be no. less stringent than Federal
requirements.
t. Also under part 288, EPA is granting
two-year national variances from the
effective dates of the land disposal
restrictions based on an analysis of
recovery, or disposal capodty. Under
$268£, case-by-case extensions of Hp to
The Administrator of EPA is solely
responsible for granting	to As
effective dates because these
ilnl ii-iHirfiiWM mi ml rnftfU aw »
national basis. In addition. It is deer
that RCRA section 3004^3) isteads far
The Agency is solely responsible far
granting such variances since the result
of such «m action may be the
establishment of a new waste
treatability group. AU wastes meeting
the criteria of these new waste
treatability groups may also be subject
to the treatment standard established by
the variance. Granting such variances
may have national impacts; therefore,
this aspect of the program is not
ittJugated to th» fitateajj thjn Him
4 Under 12684 EPA may past
petitions of specific duration to allow
land disposal of certain hazardous
wastes where it can be demonstrated
that thrae will be no migration of
hazardous constituents for as long as
the waste remains hazardous. States
which have the authority to impose
restrictions may be	under
RCRA section 3006 to grant petitions for
exemptions from the restrictions.'
Decisions on atte-apedfic petitions do
not require the national perspective
required to restrict wastes or grant
tnr+nnaiona KPA Ha lnmilMng Inn
migration** petitions lor suiface
facilities at Headquarters, thoughthe
Statpsaiflybe authorlied to grant these
petitions in die future The Agency
expects to gain valuable experience an d
information from review of "no
migration" petitions which may affect
future land cfisposal restrictions
rulemakings, hi accordance with RCRA
section3004(1], EPA will publish notice,
of the Agency's final decision on
petitions in the Federal Register.
X. Effect Of the Land Dlspwml
t>	i	I	li		—			
KMBtBDOOSnO^nBOttUDV
Environmental Piuguuns
A. Discharges Regulated Under the
Glean Water Act
' As a resait of &e land disposal
extensions after cooswhing the i
riw tiwk ntiwHnmil fiamwn
which only the Administrator can
might switch from land disposal of
restricted Third Third wastes to
discharge to publicly-owned treatment
works (POTWs) in order to avoid
incurring the costB of alternative
treatment In shifting from land disposal
to discharge to POTWs. aa increase in .
human aad environmental risks could
occur. Also as a result of the land
disposal restrictions, hazardous waste
generators might illegally discharge their
wastes to surface waters without
treatment, which could cause damage to
the local ecosystem and potentially pose
health risks from direct exposure or
fltuna generators might treat their
wastes prior to discharging to a POTW,
but the treatment step itself could
increase risks to the environment For
example, if incineration were the
pretreatment step, metals and other
hazardous constituents present in air
scrubber waters could be discharged to
surface waters. However, the amount of
Third Third waste shifted to POTWs
would betindted by such factors as the
physical form of the waste, the degree of
pretreatment required prior to discharge,
and State and local regulations.
A Discharges Regulated Under the
Marine Protection. Research, and
. Sanctuaries Act
Thate could be a potential demand for
some of the hazardous wastes included
in today's rulemaking to be shifted from
land itinpmml to nrwii Hunting and
ocean-based incineration. If the cost of
wjanJiaim) iMnpnngl phin
transportation were lower than the cost
of land-based treatment, disposal and
transportation, this option could seem to
be an attractive alternative. In addition,
ocean-based disposal could seem
attractive to the regulated community if
land-based treatment were not
available.
However, die Ocean Dumping Ban
Act of1988 has restricted ocean
dumping of sewage sludge and
industrial wastes to existing, authorized
dumpers until December 31,1991, after
which"... it shall be unlawful for any
person to dump (sewage sludge or
industrial wastes) into ocean waters..
Therefore, the Ocean Damping dan Act
has made moot any economic or other
incentive to ocean dump industrial
hazardous wastes, including the wastes
subject to this regulation.
C. Wellhead Protection Regulated under
the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Section 1428 of the SDWA contains
requirements for the development and
implementation of state Wellhead
Protection (WHP) Programs to protect
wells aod weUfields which are used, or
may be used to provide drinking water
to pnbBc water systems. Under section
1428, each state must adopt and submit
to EPA for approval a WHP propam
that at a minimum:
[1) Sp»riB»« flip	/rf atnh» aggnriaa.
local governments, and.public water systems
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 100 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22877
in the development "»d implementation of
the WHP program;
(2)	For each wellhead, determines the
wellhead protection area (WHPA), aa defined
in section 1428(e) of SDWA. baaed on all
reasonably available hydrogeologic
Information on ground-water flow, recharge,
and discharge and other information the state
deems necessary to adequately determine the
WHPA;
(3)	Identifies within each WHPA all
potential human	of contaminants
which may have any advene health effects;
(4)	Describes provisions for technical
aadgtan^ finnnrial muHitaiwio,
iwipi«mipntnHn« of control measures,
education, training, and demonstration
prefects to protect the water supply within -
WHPAs Cram such contaminants; -
(5)	Includes contingency plans for the
location »hH provision of alternate drinking
water supplies for each public water system
in the event of well or wellfield
contamination by'such contaminants;
(6)	Requires that state and local
governments and public water systems
consider all potential sources of human
contamination within the expected wellhead
area of a new water well which serves a
public water system; and
(7)	Requires public participation in
developing the WHP program.
SDWA required all states to submit a
WHP program to EPA by June 19,1989,
for EPA review and approval. EPA has
received 29 state submittals for review.
SDWA requiies that all Federal
agencies having jurisdiction over any-
potential source of contaminants
identified by a state program under this
section shall comply with all the
requirements of the state program.
Any private or public entity subject to
the land disposal restrictions regulations
must also be in compliance with the
appropriate state's wellhead protection
program. Hie Agency reiterates that the
land disposal of hazardous wastes must
comply not only with the land disposal
restrictions and other RCRA regulations,
but with other environmental programs,
such as the Wellhead Protection
Program under the Safe Drinking Water
Act
D. Air Emissions Regulated Under the
Clean Air Act (CAA)
There are two air emission concerns
with respect to the land disposal
restrictions. The first is a cross-media
concern about air emissions that occur
as a result of waste treatment such as
incineration of metal-bearing wastes
causing metal emissions to the
atmosphere. Another concern is with air
emissions from the land disposal of the
treatment residue. Air emissions control
programs are under development using
both the CAA and RCRA to address
these concerns as discussed below.
Specific cross-medla.air emission -
concerns have been identified for
treatment technologies applicable to :
Third Third wastes, but EPA believes
that existing Clean Air Act controls
adequately address die potential
problems. Retorting of mercury sulfide
wastes can result in air emissions of
both elemental mercury and sulfur
dioxide (S02). The Agency has
promulgated a National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for mercury emissions under
section 112 of die CAA (40 CFR part 61,
subpart E). There are no Industry-
spetific national CAA control standards
for S02'emissions from retorting
mercury sulfide wastes. There are;
however, regulations for the prevention
of significant deterioration (PSD) of air
quality that would address not only
these SOZ emissions but also any
mercury emissions that are not
regulated by the NESHAP.
The NESHAP limits mercury
emissions to the atmosphere from
mercury processing facilities, mercury
cell chlor-allcali plants, and plants that
incinerate and/or dry wastewater
treatment plant sludges. In all these
cases, the NESHAP limits mercury
emissions across the entire processing
facility to the extent necessary to
protect human health. The NESHAP
would not apply to a dedicated mercury
sulfide waste retorting facility that is not
located in an ore processing or a
mercury cell chlor-alkali plant EPA is
addressing problems of potential
mercury emissions by requiring that
retorters either be subject to the
NESHAP or operate with the PSDs on
which the NESHAP was based*
Under section 165(a) of the CAA, all
new major stationary sources and major
modifications to existing sources of air
pollution must obtain a PSD permit If
the mercury of S02 emissions from the
retorting process were to come from a
major stationary source or a major
modification subject to the PSD
regulations and would be emitted in
significant amounts (greater than 0.1
tons per year of mercury or 40 tons per
Sear of S02), then such emissions would
e subject to best available control
technology (BACT) requirements. An air
quality analysis for mercury and S02
would also be required under PSD.
Moreover, an air quality analysis must
be conducted to demonstrate that the
S02 emissions would neither cause nor
contribute to violations of any national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)
or PSD Increment for SO2. Facilities that
are located in areas that have failed to
meet any NAAQS for S02 (Le„
designated nonattachment areas) and
emit more than 100 tons per year of SOZ,
must not only apply emission controls
that meet the lowest achievable
emission rate but also offset their
remaining S02 emissions by acquiring
federally enforceable emission
reductions from other nearby S02
emissions sources.
The Agency is also concerned
whether incineration of wastes
containing brominated organics or
organo-nitrogen compounds may
adversely affect air quality. The
presence of bromine complicates the
evaluation of incineration of these
wastes. A detailed discussion of the
Agency's approach for brominated
organics is contained in section IILAS.b
of today's preamble. A discussion of
potential nitrogen oxide emissions from
organo-nitrogen wastes is contained in
section IIIJL5.C.
There are several general regulatory
development programs under RCRA that
address treatment technology air
emissions. Hie Agency has initiated a
three-phased program under $ 3004{n] of
RCRA to address air emissions from
hazardous waste management units
other than incinerators. The first phase
addresses organic air emissions as a
class from two types of emission
sources. The first source category is
process equipment (pumps, valves, etc.)
that contact hazardous waste that
contain greater than 10 percent organic
compounds, including such as
distillation units and incinerators. The
second source category is certain vents
on various treatment technologies, such
as air or steam strippers. These
standards were proposed in the Federal
Register on February 5,1987 (52 FR 3748)
and are expected to be promulgated this
spring.
The second phase of standards
development under section 3004{n) of
RCRA addresses organic air emissions
as a class from tanks, containers, and
surface impoundments. Treatment
technologies that occur in tanks or
containers that are not controlled by the
Phase I standards would be controlled
by these standards. Wastes that would
be prohibited from land disposal may
continue to be managed in a surface
impoundment as long as the treatment
residuals that do not meet the applicable
treatment standards are removed from
the impoundment within one year of
entry into the impoundment These
standards will control air emissions,
from the management of wastes in the
surface impoundment These standards
are expected to be proposed in the
Federal Register this spring.
In the third phase of the section
'3004(h) standards development the
Agency will develop additional
standards for the sources addressed in
-------
228TB Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. June 1. 1390 / Rules and Regulations
the first two phases as necessaiy to
address residual risks.
In addition to the section 3004{n)
standards, general standards to control
both organic and metal wntastons from
the combustion of hazardous waste in
incinerators and other types of
combustion devices are under various
stages of development
In certain cases, waste treatment may
occur in treatment technologies that are
not required to obtain RCRA permits.
Guidance for the control of air emissions
from these sources, such as exempt
biological treatment tanks and recycling
units, is being developed under die
CAA.
None of fhe regulatory efforts
discussed above address air emissions
from the land disposal of treatment
residue in landfills, land treatment units,
or waste piles because the Agency
presently presumes that these units mil
only receive wastes that have been
treated to meet the BOAT requirements.
The Agency is considering whether to
propose regulations in a separate
mlonmUng te limit stir rnnratHnnn frrrm -
land disposal units seeking to kad
dispose of wastes onder a nomination
variance,
£ Clean Up Actions Under the
Comprehensive Enviivimnmtal
Response, Compensation, and liability
Act
The land disposal restrictions may
have significant effects on the selection
and implementation of response actions
that are taken under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). Thereare three primary
areas in which these effects may occur.
One area that may be affected by the
land disposal restrictions is in fee
selection of treatment standards at &e"
remedial action site. The cleanup
standards set at CERCLA sites are risk-
based, while treatment standards
developed under the land disposal
restrictions program are technology-
based. Therefore, the technology-based.
treatment standards may be store
stringent than the risk-based cteannp
standanfa developed based on the
CERCLA selection of remedy criteria,
and vice versa. Another matter that may
be affected is the treatment of soft and
debris contaminated with wastes
restricted from laud disposal
Contaminated sofl and debris are a
primary type of waste that most be
remediated at most CERCLA sites. In '
many cases, the soil matrix is different
from that of the industrial wastes far
which treatment standards are set
requested be granted a variance from
the treatment standard (§ 28844) or a
"no-migration" variance ($ 2B&B).
Finally, even though the hazardous
substances at a CERCLA remediation
site may have been disposed prior to tba
effective date of RCRA, if the action
involves removal of restricted wastes
after the prohibition effective data, the
land disposal restrictions are legally
applicable (51FR 40S77, November 7,
1988). See also Chemical Waste
Management v. EPA. 889 F. 2d at 1535-
37 (D.C. Or. lS&ty. For example, if a
waste is excavated from a unit treated,
and redisposed. EPA has indicated that
"placement" {sot RCRA section 3004(kJ)
of the waste in a land disposal unit has
occurred, and the applicable treatment
standards must be met (see 53 FR 31444
and 51445, Qecembera. 1388}.
However, if the waste is capped in
place, removal or "placement" has not
occurred, and the treatment standards
are not legally applicable.
F. -Applicability ofTreatment Standards
to Wastes from Pesticides Regulated
Under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, tmd Rodentidde Act
A number of generators of pesticide
waste that have heretofore been
comparatively unaware of the land
disposal restrictions may be regulated
under today's rulemaking. This will
require that die Agency develop
comply with the treatment standards or
. on how to comply with die requirements
of the land disposal restrictions.
Generators of atgniflmnt quantities of
pesticide P and U wastes are farmers
and commercial pesticide applicators.
Tlie provisions of 40 CFR 2B&70 and
288.1 exempt fanners from regulation
under the land disposal restrictions
program; however no such exemption
exists ibr commercial applicators. Such ~
generators of hazardous wastes have
traditionally land disposed their
pesticide wastes. With promulgation of
today's fiaal rule, these generators must
comply with the requirements of the
lmd disposal restrictions if they dispose
a restricted hazardous waste.
G. Regulatory Overlap of
PolychfometedBiphenyis (PCBs)
Under the Toxic Substance Control Act
(TSCAJ and RCRA.
Certain P and U wastes mntnin
PCBs. The PCB «»np«nan> of such a '
waste mixture is regulated primarily
under TSCA (although it may also be a
California list waste, and subject to
RCRA regulation (both substantive and
administrative as well)), while the listed
P or U component of the waste is
regulated under RCRA. Such a mixture -
of listed/PCB waste must"meet the
appbcaUe requirements under both
statutes. Such a waste must go to an
incinerator permitted under both TSCA
ami RCRA. Any ash residual from
incineration must meet the treatment
standard for the listed waste component
prior to IfH jflgpnottl
VL Regulatory Requirements
A. Regulatory Impact Analysis—Surface
Disposed Wastes
In accordance with Executive Order
No. 12291, the Agency has reviewed the
costs and benefits of today's final rule
and has determined that today's final
rule constitutes a "major regulation"
because it results In an annual cost to
the economy In excess.of $100 million.
Asa result of this determination, the
Agency has conducted a regulatory
impact analysis (RIA) in support of
today's final rule. The complete R1A
document Regulatory Impact Analysis
of the Land Disposal Restrictions for
Third Third Scheduled Wastes Final
Rule (April 24,1990), is available for
review in the public docket for today's
final rule. The complete document was
also submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget for review, as
required by Executive Order No. 12291.
This section of die preamble
summarizes the results of the regulatory
impact analysis of the final rule, as
detailed in the RIA document, as well as
comments received on the regulatory
impact analysis for the proposed rule.
Section VLAJ below describes the
universe of wastes and facilities
affected by today's rule. Section VLAJ
below summarizes the analysis of
human health and environmental
benefits attributable to today's rule.
Section VLAJ summarizes die economic
cost and impact analysis performed for
today's rule.
The Agency analyzed benefits, costs,
and economic impacts using the same
approach and methodology that was
used for the August 17,1968, First Third
final rule (53 FR 31138].84 The effects of
the final rule were estimated by
comparing post-regulatory management
practices and conditions with those
occurring under baseline conditions.
Two post-regulatory scenarios were
examined. Under the first scenario, the
"subtitle C" scenario, all treatment
residuals would be disposed of in
subtitle C units. For the second, "subtitle
D," scenario, all characteristic waste
treatoent residuals would be disposed
of in Subtitle D units. The baseline was
M For detailed information on the cost
methodology, «ee Hugukttoij Impact Anatysh of tfm
Land Dispomd SastrictJaoM on first Third Wastes:
Final Report, Aagnsl 1988.1CF Incorporated.
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No* 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22879
defined as continued land disposal of
wastes in units meeting minimum
technological requirements.
The Agency adjusted reported waste
management practices to reflect
compliance with the land disposal
restriction rules covering solvents and
dioxins, California list wastes, and First
and Second Tliird schednled wastes. In
making these adjustments, EPA
assumed that facilities would comply
with these other rules by the least costly
methods allowable. However, though
First Third soft hammerwastes were
examined under the first Third rule
Second Third soft hammerwastes are
included in today's analysis. Thus, all
First Third, Second Third, and Third
Third wastes have been addressed in
the land disposal restrictions rules
collectively.
1. Overview of Affected Wastes,
Facilities, and Management
Hie universe of waste and facilities
examined for the R1A was developed
from EPA's "National Survey of -
Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage,
Disposal, and Recycling Facilities"
(hereafter, the TSDR Burvey) and EPA's
1984 "National Survey of Hazardous
Waste Generators and Treatment
Storage, and Disposal Facilities
Regulated under RCRA in 1981"
(hereafter, the RIA Mail survey). Data
from these surveys have been updated
as part of the capacity analysis
accompanying this rulemaking (see
discussion in Section 3B). The data used
for the final regulatory analysis reflect
this updated data base and are
¦consistent wfth the data, used for thg
capacity analysis accompanying the
proposed rule.
As with past land disposal restrictions
RIAs, die TSDR and RIA Mail surveys
provide an overview of die number of
facilities treating, storing, and disposing
of waste; the quantities and types of
waste (by RCRA waste code) managed
at each facility; and the current practice
or method of treatment The adjusted
information contained in the two
surveys is accepted as the baseline (Le-,
pre-Third Third rule) practice for this
RIA.
Several commenters noted that the
quantities of waste estimated do not
include non-hazardous waste that may
have been affected by the Agency's
proposed dilution prohibition. In today's
rule, however, the Agency to allowing
facilities that discharge their
characteristic wastes under a NPDES
permit or dispose of it in a UIC well to
dilute. The Agency is also allowing
facilities that generate non-toxic'
characteristic wastes (with the
exception of high TOC ignitable
nonwastewaters, reactive cyanide
wastes, and reactive sulfide wastes) to
dilute their wastes in order to achieve
treatment standards. However,
characteristic wastes discharged
pursuant to an NPDES permit with a
" specified method, cannot be rendered
nonhazardous through dilution alone.
The Agency believes, therefore, that it
has accurately analyzed the impact of
today's rule.
Quantity of Affected Waste. Today's
rule affects approximately 277 million
gallons of waste per year as shown in
Table Vt-1. An additional 44 million
gallons (per year) of multisource
leachate may also be affected by today's
rule.
Table VM.—Third Third Rule
Quantity by Waste Type
On mffloo gaBons per year)
Tabi e Vt-3.—Third Third Rue
Volumes by Facsuty Type
[in iriBon gaSons per year]

VoL
Pa*
cant
Iqnllabta 0)001), cowmfre (D002),


and reactive waste* (0003)	
42
15
EP toode wastes (0004-0016) and



122
44
IKfrHf rnirtin
2
32
79
1
12
28
flf V'MBtffB
C8I wastes	'
Total
277
100

Characteristic wastes constitute the
largest volume of wastes covered by the
final rule. In addition to the 59 percent
identified as D001-D018, the waste
mixtures category is dominated by
characteristic wastes. Table VI-2 gives
the volumes of the most affected
characteristic wastes.
Table Vl-2.—Predominant
Characteristic Wastes by Volume
On tnOon gatons per year!
0008 (EPTodc for lead)-
0007 (EPToobc tor chromium).
0002(Corortw)
0001 (Igntlafale).
Mixtures d 0006 and I
0006 (Cadmium)-
0003 (Reacttwa)	
Affected Facilities. A total of 110
waste management facilities and nearly
1,70Q waste generators are affected by
today's final rule. Table Vt-3 provides a
breakdown of affected facilities and
their volumes managed.
FacOSes
Vol-
ume
Per-
cent
No. Of
lacO.
lies
Commercial FadStias—
Noncommercial
C~«Moa
212
69
NA
277
77
23
NA
100
37
73
1,688
1.796
OMf"*""


The affected facilities represent a
wide variety of industries in 22 major
industrial groups. A further examination
of the TSDR survey data reveals the
following information about the range of
industries with large volumes of Third
Third wastes.
The volume of commercial process
waste, which accounts for 77 percent of
the total waste volume, is distributed
across the following SIC groups:
•	Electric. Gas, & Sanitary Services
(SIC 49)	i 	43 percent
•	Services Not Elsewhere Classified
(SIC 89)-
44 • Chemicals A Allied Products (SIC
.Spercent
.7 percent
Hie volume of noncommercial process
waste, which accounts for 23 percent of
the total waste volume, is distributed
across the following Standard Industrial
Code (SIC) groups:
•	Non-classifiable Establishments (SIC
99) 	52 percent
•	Primary Metals Industries [SIC 33}~13 per-
cent
•	Petroleum Refining & Related
Industries (SIC 29)-	llO percent
•	Chemicals & Allied Products (SIC
28)	8 percent
•	CBI Facilities	
S3
41
17
17
9
e
7
	IS percent
Waste Management Practices. Based
on the TSDR survey, the RIA examined
five land disposal baseline management
practices: disposal in landfills, disposal
by land treatment disposal in surface
impoundments, treatment in waste piles,
and storage in waste piles. Table VI-4
provides a breakdown of these baseline
management practices by volume and
number of facilities. As shown,
approximately half of the waste volume
covered by the final rule is currently
managed In landfills. Landfills are also
the most prevalent baseline practice,
occurring at just over one half of the
affected facilities.
-------
•nastn Fe al Register / Vol 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table Vi-4.—ThirdThiro Rule
Baseuke Management Practices
On mflton gaSons par year]
Basefine practice
Volume
Percenl
FacBttec
212
' 6
2ft
27
3
. 77
2
10
10
• 1


Treatment waste pwan ¦
Disposal surface knpound*
Tojai* ¦
277
- - 100

a »	-»—	— ¦ ¦* « *« i mi	——		 * _.j|i
ejtcmci nsnoBQ 44 rnuovi j1""11* 01 fflURp
source loactinta
The quantity of multisource leachate
is not well characterized at present
However, the RIA estimates that over
150 million gallons of leachate are
generated (annually) creating up to 44
million gallons of leachate residue
subject to the land disposal restrictions.
Treatment practices in compliance -
with today's final rule significantly .
redistribute the quantities of waste
among managemnt practices. Most
important while 277 million gallons of
waste per year are land disposed under
baseline management practices (of
which 212 million gallons are landfilled),
206 million gallons of waste per year -
would be disposed of in lanHfilia under
the subtitle C sceiuuio as a result of
today's final rule and 208 million gallons
of waste per yew under the subtitle D
scenario. Thus, the final rule results in a
28percentreductionjta the volume of
Third Third wastes being land disposed
under the Subtitle C scenario, and a 25
percent reduction under the subtitle D
Scenario. Many of the wastes covered -
by the final rule are treated by chemical
precipitation or stabilization.
2. Benefits of the Final Rule
The final rale would result in several
benefits including reduced human health
risks, imroved safety at facilities, and
reduced ecological effects. As with -
previous land disposal restrictions, die ¦
Agency quantified the human health* .
-	benefits aind conducted a qualitative ¦
analysis of the other benefits.
Human Health Benefits. The ~
quantitative benefits analysis estimated
that over a 70-year lifetime, the final rule
reduces cancer cases by 318 and '
-	reduces die number of people exposed
to at least one noncarcmogen above
health-based criteria'by aboutMOO.-
Theae results are the same for both
scenarios.
In general the majority of cancer -
cases averted is due to reduced
inhalation exposure to benzene,
. acrylonitrilei phenanthrene, - .
tiuroanthene, dichloromethane and
other carcinogenic constituents in D0O1
ignitable wastes and mixtures of
ignitable and reactive wastes. The
majority noncardnogenic benefits Is due
to reduced ingestion of cadmium (D008),
chromium (D007), lead (D008), as well as
mixtures with these metals or mercury
and. D001 ignitable waste containing
pentaclorob enzene and methanol.
It is important to note that these
human health benefits are highly
. sensitive to the facility, (and population)
and waste .characterizations used for the
analysis. In fact the majority of human
health benefits is due to a limited
number of waste streams at a few
facilities. For example, over 4*000 of the
non-cancer "benefits" result from the
reduction of a highly concentrated
chromium waste that leaches to ground
water used as a drinking water source
for a populous Northeastern community.
And nearly 1,000 non-cancerHbenefitsH
are attributable to reducing high
concentration air releases of
pentachlorobenzene and methanol in a
land application and a landfill unit .
Similarly, over 200 of thecancercases
averted Tesult from reducing irir releases
of phenanthrene end fluroanthene in
land application units at two facilities.
What these examples reveal is the
relationship betweeh human health
benefits, and the attributes of a facility.
Given any data base, the facilities with. -
highly concentrated waste in densely
populated area*will significantly drive
thehuman health benefits results.
Therefore, we believe that the data
gives a true representation of reality by
the inclusion of these few driving
. facilities.
The Agency has not estimated
benefits attributable .to treating
multisource leachate residue because of
a lack of characterization and facility
data. However: the Agency, by way of a
screening analysis, developed a
hypothetical characterization of -
multisource leachate residue and
simulated releases at several well-
defined, facilities. While the. results are
extremely sensitive to-the assumptions
and hypothetical characterization, they
. showed the possibility of roughly 200
cancer and 200 non^cancer cases
avoided. Again, these results an highly
uncertain because of the lack of
sufficient data, but they do suggest that
the benefits associated with the
treatment of multisource leachate
residues may be significant
The Agencybelieves that the overall
benefit estimates are uncertain and may
overstate or underestimate the human-
health benefits of the proposed rule The
. RCRA Risk-Cost Analysis model does
not contain enough data to model all of
the constituents found in the Third Third
wastes. As a mult benefits of
regulating wastes with one or more of
these missing constituents may be
underestimated. This underestimate is
most likely to occur for wastes
containing pesticides, the sole
hazardous constituent of D012-D017,
and about 18 "P" wastes.
Human health benefits may also be
underestimated because the benefits
model only includes exposure via
¦ drinking water or air. Not estimated ere
the deleterious effects from consuming
of contaminated'food, such as fish
caught downstream of releases,
recreation exposure, due to contact with
polluted rivers, lakes, or streams, and
the averting of public benefits due to the
destruction of these recreational areas.
At the same time, benefits may be
overestimated due to conservative
exposure assumptions. Exposure
scenarios are based on drinking 2 liters/
'day for seventy years of contaminated
water or inhalation of 20 cubic meters/
day of air for seventy years.
Safety Benefits. In addition to adverse
human health effects, ignitable (D001)
and reactive (D003) wastes may pose a
general safety hazard. In the past land
disposal of these wastes has only been
allowed if the waste either is
deactivated or precautions are taken to
prevent accidental ignition or reaction.
Until the ignitable or reactive wastes are
deactivated, there is some continuing
risk that die precautions may fail,
resulting in fires, explosions, or release
of toxic gases. The final rule requires
deactivation of the approximately 24
milUfCTi gallons of D001 and D003 being
land disposed, thereby eliminating the
safety risk. However, this benefit is not
significant due to the popular practice of
deactivation currently employed by
facilities.
Environmental Benefits. The final rule
results in an overall reduction in toxic
releases to the environment thereby
reducing adverse effects to ecosystems.
The resulting improvement in ecological
health is extremely difficult to quantify
due to uncertainty in estimating
exposure levels and species populations.
However, the sensitivity of certain
species to hazardous constituents of
wastes covered by the final rule
suggests a very high potential for
ecological effects.
As an example, aquatic species are at
least two orders of magnitude more
sensitive than humans to arsenic (D004).
mercury (D009), silver (D011). lindane
(0013), methoxychlor (DOM), and
toxaphene (D015). Therefore, aquatic
ecosystems may be at some risk even
when there is no human health risk.
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 7 Friday. June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22681
Another way to look at the potential
for ecological effects is to consider the
proximity of land disposal facilities to
' waterbodies. A recant Agency study on
ecological risks showed that for a
sample of 52 National Priorities List
sites, almost 90 percent of the sites ..
posed a threat to freshwater ecosystems,
doe to their proximity to waterbodies.88
Wastes removed from some of these
sites may be subject to the treatment
standards promulgated in this rale.
Thus, the final rale reduces ecological .
risk associated with Third Third wastes
managed at these sites.
3. Costs
¦ The final rale results in an annual
incremental cost of approximately <353
million under the Subtitle D scenario'
and $440 million under the Subtitle C
scenario, and affects over 1,700 facilities
in 22 industrial sectors. Table Vl-S
summarizes the estimated incremental
costs associated with today's final rule
bywastetype.	¦
TABLEVt-5.—THIRD YhTRO Rule
Volumes and Incremental Cost
[MSon gafcns/yrand mfflon S/yr]
Table VW6.—Wastes Incurwnqthe
Most Incremental Cost
tin nfflon doBan/yearl
Table Vl-8.—Summary of Economic
Impact by Type of Facility—Sub-
title C
waste type
: VW-
una'
Cost (In doSsra)
0
SubStto
C
0001,0002, D003_
rwv4_rmia
42
122
2
32
79
SSI
123
IS
83
SI
$87
168
, IS
102
80
Listed waste
nm«K«mii0a

277
*353
*440

As expected, based an volumes, the
largest incremental cost is attributed to
the management of D008 [lead) waste.
Although the listed wastes are a small
volume and have the lowest total cost,
expensive treatment technologies such
as incineration result in a much higher
cost per volume treated. Conversely, the
corrosive wastes and mixtures with
corrosive wastes are relatively
inexpensive to neutralize, resulting in a
low cost per volume treated.
Five characteristic waBtea contribute
about 45 percent of the incremental cost
of the rule as shown in table VI-8. EP
toxic wastes for lead (D008) and
ignitable wastes (D001) are the two
single wastes that incur the most
incremental cost -
0008-
0001.
0007_
0009.
0004/D006/D007/DOOS-
0003	
0007/0008.
0001/0002/0007/0008-
0002	:		
" Summaryvf Boo/ogical Rfala. Assessment
Methodx.and JUsj Mmmgnrmmt Deciaioa in
Superfund cmdRCRA (EPArao-OS-89-OM) (ana
I 1889.
Economic
Impact
Nonoon*
MRtal
Com
Gener-
ator
Total
CompSaneo




ooat




(SMI)
2*
329
235
259
Affected




. tea.
-73
37
1,668
1,798

-



- aBwastf
• 3
NA
429
432
UIRNM




.s rtnnirii
• 0
NA
14
' 14'
.Affected




Mustiy




group#
. 12
9
18
22
The cost of treating D002corrosive
wastes attributed to the final rule may
be overestimated by as much as $5
million because some of these wastes
may be treated due to the California List
Land Disposal Restrictions rule (52 FR
25780). That rule established a
performance standard prohibiting land
disposal of wastes with a pH less than 2,
while die final p»i« establishes a
technology-based standard of
deactivation (Le« neutralization). The
Agency does not have' data on how
facilities are meeting the California List
standard. Without specific data about
the post£alifomia List practices, the
entire cost of neutralizing D0Q2 acidic
wastes were attributed to this final rule.
4. Economic Impacts
Tables VI-7 and VI-8 summarize the
cost and economic impact of die final
rule under subtitle D and subtitle C,
respectively. Compliance costs are the
tax-adjusted revenue requirements
needed to fond the incremental costs
discussed above. Significantly affected
facilities are those that either need to
increase costs by more than 5 percent or
their compliance costs exceed 5 percent
of their cash from Operations.
Table W-7.—Summary of Economic
Impact by Type of Facility— Sub-
title D
_ Economic
impact
Noncom-
mercial
Com
Gener-
ator
Total
CompRanoe




(SMB)
30
410
299
329
Affected




taca.
73
37
1,686
1,796
U^BmWHIJI
-**- - -
SVTOCtBQ
4
NA
952
556
Estimated




dosurea
0
M
14
14
Affected




-Industry .




groups
12
9
IS
22





The economic analysis estimates that
the final rule does not have a significant
effect on industry. The effects of the
final rule are distributed over a wide
range oflndustries in 22 major industrial
groups rather than concentrated in a few
industries.
Generators are the type of facilities
that incur the largest economic impact
The analysis estimates that 91 percent
of the compliance cost are borne by
.generators under both subtitle C and
subtitle D scenarios. Also, 33 percent of
the affected generators are significantly
affected under subtitle C scenario, and
25 percent are significantly affected
xinder subtitle D scenario.
The analysis estimates that 14
facilities would close as a result of the
final rule. By comparison, the First Third
rule was estimated to result in almost
200 closures. These 14 potential closures
represent less than 4 percent of die 429
significandy affected generators under
subtitle D scenario and less than 3
percent of the 552 significantly affected
generators under subtitle C scenario.
The TSDR survey identified only 2
small businesses that currently land
dispose Third Third waste. Neither is
significandy affected under the final
rule.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis—
Surface Disposed Waste
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq„ whenever an
Agency is required to publish a notice of
rulemaking, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RFA)
that describes the effect of the rule on
small entities (Le.. small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions). This
analysis is unnecessary, however, if the
Agency's Administrator certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic
effect on a substantial"number of small
entities.
-------
F« 1 Regster / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday. Jane 1. 1990 / Ru and Regulations
EPA evaluated the economic effect of
the final role on small entities, here
AnfinaA as firms employing fewer than
SO persons. Becauseof data limitations,
the Agency was. unable to include
generators of large quantities of Third .
Third wastes. The small business
population, therefore Included only two <
groups: all noncommercial TSDFs
employing fewer than 50 persons-and all
small quantity generators (SQGs) that
were also small businesses. Asa result
the effect of the final rule on small ...-
. businesses la underestimated^ However,
the Agency would not expect the
conclusions of the small business -
analysis, to significantly if die
generator data were available.
According to EPA's guidelines for
conducting.an RFA. if over20percent of
the pojpulation of small businesses,
«m»ll organizations, or small
government Jurisdictions is. likely to
experience financial distress based on
the costs of the *ul£ thai the Agency is .
required to consider that the rule will .
have a significant effect on a substantial
number of small entities and to perform
a formal RFA. EPA has examined the
final rule's effects on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility -
Act-	•
The economic analysis identified only
2 small businesses affected by the final
rule. Neither of the 2 would be .
significantly affected. The Administrator
therefore certifies that part 208 does not
have significant economic effects on a
substantial number of small entities. As
a result of this finding, the Agency has
not prepared a formal RFA.
C Regulatory Impact Analysis—
Underground Injected Wastes .
. The Agency has completed-a separate
regulatory impact analysis for
underground injeeted wastes affected by
today's final rule. The completed RIA
document Regulatory Impact Analysis
of Proposed Hazardous Waste Disposal
Restrictions For Class I Injection of'
Third Thirds List Wastes, is available in
thepublicdocket for the final rule.
There an 65 infection fadlities^of the
total number of Class I injection j .
facilities, injecting approximately 8
billion gallons of Third Third wastes
annually.'including over 47 billion
gallons of characteristic wastes.. These
Class 1 hazardous injection facilities are
required to either treat wastes, or file
"no migration" petitions as outlined in
40CFR part 148 [See 53 FR 28118
preamble for a more thorough discussion
of the no migration petition review.
process). Hie additional facilities
affected by today's rulemaking
substantially contribute to overall
compliance costs already incurred by
Class I injection well owners and
operators managing hazardous wastes
regulated by previous rulemaking.
The Agency analyzed costs and
benefits lor today's rule by using the
same approach and methodology
developed'in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis of the Underground Injection
Control Program: Proposed Hazardous
Waste Disposal Injection Restrictions
used for the July 28,1988 final rule (53
FR 28118) and subsequent rulemaking..
An analysis was performed to assess.
tha economic effect of associated
compliance costs for the-additional
volumes of bijected wastes attributable
to today's final rule.	'
Total compliance costs for injected
wastes are estimated-at $54 million
annually. Alternative treatment costs
are estimated at $537 million annually,
and no migration petition costs are
annualized at $1X3 million. The RIA
estimates that 17 facilities will
eventually treat their wastes, and.
therefore be significantly affected
economically by today's final rule. All of
these costs will be incurred by Class I
hazardous injection well owners and
operators.
Hie benefits to human health and the
environment in the RIA are generally
defined a» the reducedhuman health
risk resulting from fewer instances of
ground-water contamination. In general,
potential health risks from Class I
hazardous waste injection wells are
extremely low. However, die RIA
references a few isolated cases where
rides to human health and the
environment may be greater, but are Still
too low to quantify. These cases involve
possible grout seal failure around the
protective casing of an injection well,
and the occurrence of unplugged bore
holes around die injection well site. Of
studies-conducted to describe Class I
well problems, only six wells, or less
than, two percent of all Class I wells,
were reported to have experienced.
malfunctions that contributed to any •
contamination of the surface or an
underground source-of drinking water.
No- health-related problems attributed to
Class 1 injection were reported. -
D. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis—
Underground Injection Wastes
Owners and operators of hazardous
waste injection wells are generally
major chemical, petrochemical, and .
other manufacturing companies. The '
Agency is not aware of any small.
entities of injection wells that would be
affected by part 148 of today's final rale.
The Administrator therefore certifies
that part 148 and part 268 will not have
significant economic effects on a
substantial number of small entitles. As
a result of this finding, the Agency has
not prepared a formal RFA
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
Alt information collection
requirements in this final rule were .
promulgated in previous land disposal
restrictions rulemakings (including those
for die Underground Injection Control
Program) and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) at that
time. Since there are no new information
collection requirements being.,
promulgated today, an Information
Collection Request has not been -
prepared.
P Review of Supporting Documents
The primary source of information on
current land disposal practices and
industries affected by this rule was
EPA's.1888 "National Survey of
Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage,
Disposal, and Recycling Facilities" (the
TSDR Survey). The average quantity of
waste contributed by generator facilities
was obtained from EPA's "National
Survey of Hazardous Waste Generators
and Treatment Storage, and Disposal
Facilities Regulated under RCRA in
1981" (April 1984).
Waste stream characterization data
and engineering costs of waste
management were based on the
following EPA documents:
•	"Characterization of Waste Streams
Listedin 40 CFR Section 281 Waste
Profiles," Vols. I and II (August 1985);
•	"Characterization of Constituents
from Selected Waste Streams Listed in
40 CFR Section 281." Vols. I and D
(August 1985);
•	RCRA background and listing
documents for 40 CFR Section 261:
•	RCRA Section 3007 industry studies;
•	"RCRA Risk-Cost Analysis Model.
Appendix A: Waste Stream Data Base"
(March 1984):
•	Source assessment documents for
various industries; and
•	"1988-1987 Survey of Selected Firms
in the Commercial Hazardous Waste
Management Industry: Final Report"
(March 1988).
Financial information for the
economic impact analysis was obtained
from the 1982 Census of Manufacturers
and 1984 Annual Survey of
v Manufacturers. Producer price indices
v were used to restate 1984 dollars in 1990
terms.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 148,281,
282,284,285,288,270,271, and 302
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information. Designated facility,
Environmental protection, Hazardous
-------
Federal-Register / VoL 85. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22683
materials. Hazardous materials
transportation. Hazardous waste.
Intergovernmental relations. Labeling,'
Manifests, Packaging and containers.
Penalties, Recycling, Reportable
Quantities, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. Waste treatment and
disposal. Water pollution control. Water -
supply.
Dated: May 8,10901
F. Henry Hahtcht,
Acting Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 148—HAZARDOUS WASTE
INJECTION RESTRICTIONS
1.	Hie authority citation for part 148
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 3004, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act 42 U.S.C.
OSOletteq.
2.	Section 148.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
S 148.1
• • ' ~ • •
(d) Wastes that are hazardous only
betause they exhibit a hazardous
characteristic, and which are otherwise
prohibited under this part are not
prohibited if the wastes:
(1)	Are disposed into a nonhazaidous
or hazardous injection well defined .
under 40 CFR 144.0(a); and
(2)	Do not exhibit any prohibited
characteristic of hazardous waste
ldentifiedin subpart C of part 281 at the'
•point of injection. . '
3.	Section 148.14 is amended by
redesignating paragraphs- (d), (e), (f). and
(g) as paragraphs (e), (g), (h), and (j): by
revising the introductory text of newly
redesignated paragraph (j): and by
adding new paragraphs (d), (f), and (i) to
read as follows: ¦
9148.14 Waste specific proWblttoiie fli'st
uuTQ OTpTWi
(d) Effective August 8,1990, die
wastes specified in 40 CFR 261.31 as
EPA Hazardous Waste Number F008
(wastewaters] and F019; the wastes
specified in 40. CFR 28L32 as EPA
Hazardous Waste Numbers K004, K008,
K015 (nonwastewaters), K017.K021
(wastewaters), K022 (wastewaters),
K031, K035, K048 (reactive
nonwastewaters and all wastewaters), .
K060 (wastewaters), K081
(wastewaters), K069. (calcium sulfate
nonwastewaters and all wastewaters),
K073.K083, K084, K085, K088 (all but
solvent washes), K101 (high arsenic
nonwastewaters), K102 (high arsenic
nonwastewaters), and K10B; and the
wastes specified in 40 CFR part 28L33
as EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers
P0OtPO04.P005.P010, POll, P012, P015,
P016, P018, P020, P03& P037, P048, P05a
P058, P0S9, P088, P069, P070, P081, P082,
P084, P087. P092, P102, P105, P108, Plia
P115.P120, P122, P123, U007, U009, U010,
U012, U018, U018, U019, U022, U029,
U031. U038, U037, U041, U043, U044,
U046, uosa U0S1, U053, U061, U083,
U084, U068, U067, U074, U077, U078,
U088, U089, U103, U105, U108, UUS,
U122, U124, U129, U130, U133, U134,
¦U137, U1SJ^U154, U155, U157, U158,
U159, U171, U177, Ul8a U185, U188,
U192, U200, U209, U2ia U211, U219,
U220, U228, U227, U228, U237, U23&
U248, and U249 are prohibited from
underground iniection at off-site
injection facilities.
(f) Effective November 8,1990, the
wastes specified in paragraph (d) of this
section are prohibited from underground
injection at on-site injection facilities.
(1) Effective May 8,1992; the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 28132 and 281.33 as.
EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers K011
(wastewaters), K013 (wastewaters), and
K014 are prohibited from underground
- injection.
(j) The requirements of paragraphs (a)
through (i) of this section do not apply:
• • • • •
4. Section 148.15 is amended by
redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as
paragraphs (e) and (g); by revising the
introductory text of newly redesignated
paragraph (g); and by adding new
paragraphs (d) and (f) to read as
follows:
} 148.15 Waste spectfioproMbraons—
seoond tMitl wmtwu.
•	•	• ¦ •	t
(d) Effective August 8,1990. the '
wastes specified in 40 CTR 281J32 as
EPA Hazardous Waste Number K025
(wastewaters), K029 (wastewaters),
K041, KD42, K095 (wastewaters), K098 '
(wastewaters), K097, K098, and K10S;
and the wastes specified in 40 CFR part
281*33 as P002, P003, P007, P008, P014,
P028, P027, P049, P054, P057, P060, P068,
P067, P072, P107, P112, P113, P114, U002,
U003, U005, UOOa, U011, U014, U015,
uoza U021, U023, U025, U028, U032,
U035, U047, U049, U057, U059, U060,
U062, U070, U073»U080, U083, U092,
U093, U094, U095, U097, U098, U099,
uiot uioe, ui09, una um, uii4,
una U119, U127.U128, U131, U13S,
U138, U140, U142, U143, U144, U146,
U147, U149, UlSa U161, U182, U183, "
U184, U16S, U188, U169, U170, U172.
U173, U174, U178, U178, U179, U189,
U193, U196, U203, U205, U208, U208,
U213, U214, U215, U218, U217, U218,
U239, and U244 are prohibited from
underground injection at off-site
injection facilities.
•	ft	•	t	ft
(f)	Effective November 8,1990, the
wastes specified in paragraph (d) of this
section are prohibited from underground
injection at on-site injection facilities.
(g)	The requirements of paragraphs (a)
through (!) of this section do not apply:
ft	ft	ft	ft	ft
5. Section 148.18 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (c) as
paragraph (g); by revising the
introductory text of newly redesignated
paragraph (g); and by adding new
paragraphs (c), (d), (e), and (f) to read as
follows:
S 148.16 Wast* specific prohibitions—
tWrd tMrd wastes.
ft	ft	ft	ft	ft
(c)	Effective August 8,1990, the
wastes identified in 40 CFR 281.31 as
EPA Hazardous Waste Number F039
(multi-source leaichate); the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 281.32 EPA
Hazardous Waste Numbers K002, K003,
K005 (wastewaters), K008. K007
(wastewaters), K023, K028, K032, K033,
K034, K093, K094 and K100
(wastewaters); the wates specified in 40
CFR 28133 as P006, P009, P017, P022,
P023, P024, P028, P031, P033, P034, P038,
P042, P045, P048, P047, P051, P056, P084,
P065, P073, P075, P078, P077, P078, P088,
P093, P095, POM, P099, P101, Pi 03, Pi 09,
P118, P118, P119, U001, U004, U008,
U017, U024, U027, U030, U033, U038,
U034, U038, U039, U042, U045, U048,
U032, U0S5, U0S8, U068, U071, U072,
U075, U078, U079, U081, U082, U084,
U085, U087, U088, U090, U091, U098,
uii2, um Uii7, una ui2a U121,
U123, U125, U128, U132, U136, U139,
U141. U145, U148, U152, U153, U1S8,
Uiea U168, U167, U181, U182, U183,
U184, U188, U187, U191, U194, U197,
U201, U202, U204, U207, U222, U225,
U234, U238, U24a U243, and U247; and
the wastes identified in 40 CFR 281.21,
281.23 or 281.24 as hazardous based on a
characteristic alone, designated as D001,
D004, D005, D008, D008, D009
(wastewaters). D010, D011, D012, D013,
D014, D015, D018, D017 are prohibited
from underground injection at off-site
injection facilities.
(d)	Effective August 8,1990, mixed
radioactive/hazardous waste in 40 CFR
268.1a 288.11, and 288.12, that are mixed
radioactive and hazardous wastes, are
prohibited from underground injection,
(e)	Effective November 8,199a the
wastes aperified in.paragraph (c) of this
section are prohibited from underground
-------
22684 Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. Jane 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
injection at on-site injection farfiitw
These effective dates do not apply to die
wastes listed in 40 CFR 148.12(b) which
are prohibited from underground
injection on August 8,1990.
(I) Effective May 8,1992, die wastes
identified in 40 CFR 28122,28123 or.
28124 as hazardous based on a
characteristic alone, designated as D002
(wastewaters and nonwastewaters),
D003 (wastewaters and
"nonwastewaters), D007 (wastewaters
end nonwastewaters], and D009
(nonwastewaters) are prohibited from .
underground injection. These effective
dates do no apply to the wastes listed hi
40 CFR 148.12(b) which are prohibited
from underground injection on August 8,
1990.
(g) The requirements of paragraphs (a)
through (f) of this section do not apply:
PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
1 The authority citation far part 261
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6903,69121a). 6921.
8922, sod 693a
Subpart C—CharacterteScs of
Hazardous Waste
2. In 9 281.20, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
{26120
*	ft	ft	ft . "•
/
(b) A hazardous waste which is
identified by a characteristic in this
subpart is assigned every EPA
Hazardous Waste Number that is
applicable as set forth in this subpart
This number must be in complying with-
the notification requirements of section
3010 of the Act and all applicable
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements parts 262 through
285,288, and 270 of this chapter.
ft	ft	*	ft	ft
9261.23 Characteristic of rcactMty.
-~ * • « ' #•
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of reactivity has die EPA
Hazardous Waste Number of D003.
8. In 9 28124, parapaph (b)
introductory text is revised to read as
follows:
S 261.24 ToiMtyctiaractertsSa
~	ft' ftft	ft
(b) A solid.waste that exhibits the '
characteristic of toxicity has die EPA
Hazardous Waste Number specified in
Table I which corresponds to die toxic
contaminant """Hnj it to be hazardous:
ft	ft	ft	ft	ft '
Subpart D—Lists of Hazardous Wastes
7. Section 26131 is amended By
adding die following waste oode in
alphanumeric order.
828131. Hazardous wastes from non-
Industty
and EPA
waste N&
R339-
Lsachate resulting from (I).
or dtapowl ut
ctftflwrt by mm San
ons waste oode undsr
Subpart 0, or ftom a
mtature aI wastes cias-
sMed undsr Subparts C
and O of Ms part
(Laadata raariUng boa
the management of one
or more of the Mowing
EPA ItamiJuui Wastss
snd no other ImiwiIiiui
wastes retains tts hat
raS* r£i. OBFoai
F023, F028, F027, and/
orRHS.).
a In # 28121, paragraph fl>) is revised
to read as follows:
S2612t Characteristic of IpnHatoBty.
ft	ft	ft	•	ft
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of i^iitabffity has the EPA
Hazardous Waste Number of Don.
4.	In S 281-22, paragraph (b) is revised^
to read as follows:
926122 Charactertstte of cerrosMty.
ft	~	ft	ft	ft
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of corrosMty has the EPA
Hazardous Waste Number of D002.
5.	In $ 28123, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
8. Paragraph (c) of $ 28133 is revised
to read as follows: (the comment
paragraph remains):
{26133 Discarded wmnsfBlaf chemical
products. ofNapadflcaflan species,
9. Appendix VII is amended by adding
die following waste stream in
alphanumeric order to read as follows:
Appendix VII—Basis for Listing
Hazardous Waste
erA naiarooui
iNa
Hazardous constHuanta for
wfocn ttstoo
F038.
AO oonstttuents (or wNch traat-
mutt-souice
and non-
wastewaters) under 40 CFR
268.43(a). Table CCW.
(c) Any residue remaining in a
container or in an inner liner removed
from a container that has held any
commercial chemical product or
manufacturing chemical intermediate
having the generic name listed in
paragraphs (e) or (f) of this section,
. unless die container is empty as Hoflnml
in S 2817(b) of this chapter.
PART 262—STANDARDS APPLICABLE
TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
1.	The authority citation for part 282
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U&C. 6906,6912,6922,6923,
8924,6926, and 6937.
Subpart A—General
2.	Paragraph (c) introductory text of
8	282.11 is revised to read as follows:
9	262.11 Hazardous waste determination.
ft	ft	ft	ft	ft
(c) For purposes of compliance with 40
CFR part 288, or if the waste is not listed
in subpart D of this part the generator
must then determine whether the waste
is Identified in subpart C of 40 CFR part
281 by either
Subpart C—Pro-Transport
Requirements
3. Paragraph (a)(4) of § 282^4 is
revised to read as follows:
{262J4 Accumulation time.
(a) * * •
(4) Hie generator complies with the
requirements for owners or operators in
subparts C and D in 40 CFR part 265,
with ( 265.16, and with 40 CFR
2887(a)(4).
PART 264—STANDARDS FOR
OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT,
STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES
/
1 The authority citation for part 284
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905,6012(a). 6924. and
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules ana Regulations
22685
Subpart B—General Facffity Standards
2.	In 9 284.13, die comment following
Paragraph (a)(2] is revised to read as
follows:
'{284.13 General waste analysis.
(•)***
(2)* * *
[Comment: For example. the {unity's
record* of analyses performed on the waste
before the effective data of these regulations,.
af studies conducted on hazardous waste.
generated from processes similar to that
which generated the waste to be managed at
the facility, may be included in the data base .
required to comply with paragraph (a)(1) of
this section. The owner or operator of an off-
site facility may arrange for the generator of
the hazardous waste to supply part of the
information required by paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, except as othewise specified in
40 CTR 2S&7 (b) and (c). If the generator does
not supply the information, and the owner or
operator chooses to accept a hazardous
waste, the owner or operator is responsible
for obtaining the information required to
comply with this section.]
• ~ • • •
Subpart K—Surface Impoundments
3.	The introductory text of S 284.229 is
revised to read as follows:
9284429 Special requirements for
tgnHsNo or reactive wastes
Ignitable or reactive waste must not
be placed in a surface impoundment
unless the waste and impoundment
satisfy all applicable requirements of 40
CFR part 288, and:
Subpart L—Waste Piles
4. The introductory text of 8 284.256 is
revised to read as follows:
{284388 Special requirements for
Ignltablo or reectlve waste.
Igni table or reactive waste must not
be place in a waste pile unless the waste
and waste pile satisfy all applicable
requirements of 40 CFR part 288, and:
Subpart M—Land Treatment
5. The introductory text of 9 264.281 is
revised to read as follows:
9284381 Special requirements for
Ignltable or reactive wests.
The owner or operator must not apply
igni table or reactive waste to the
treatment zone unless the waste and the
treatment zone meet all applicable
requirements of 40 CFRpart 288, and:
Subpart W LandflBs
8. In 9 284312, paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (b) are revised to
read as follows:
8 284.312 Special requirements for
ignttaMe or reactive waste.
(a)	Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, and in 9 284.316,
igni table or reactive waste must not be
placed in a landfill, unless the waste
and londflll meet all applicable
requirements of part 288, and:
• • • • • •
(b)	Except for prohibited wastes
which remain subject to treatment
standards in subpart D of part 288,
igni table wastes in containers may be
landfilled without meeting the
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section, provided that the wastes are
disposed of in such a way that they are
protected from any material or
conditions which may cause them to
ignite. At a minimum, igni table wastes'
must be disposed of in non-leaking
containers which are carefully handled
and placed so as to avoid heat, sparks,
rupture, or any other condition that
might cause ignition of the wastes; must
be covered daily with soil or other non-
combustible material to minimize the
potential for ignition of the wastes; and
must not be disposed of in cells that
contain or will contain other wastes
which may generate heat sufficient to
cause ignition of the waste.
7. In 9 284.318, paragraph (f) is added
to read as follows:
9284418 Disposal of small containers of
hazardous wests In ovevpecfccd dnuite (lab
packs).
*****
(f) Such disposal is in compliance with
the requirements of Part 288. Persons .
who incinerate lab packs according to
the requirements in 40 CFR 288.42(c)(1)
may use fiber drums in place of metal
outer containers. Such fiber drums must
meet the DOT specifications in 49 CFR
173.12 and be overpacked according to
the requirements in paragraph (b) of this
section.
PART 268—INTERIM STATUS
STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND
OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND
DISPOSAL FACILITIES
1.	The authority citation for part 285
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U&C. 6908,6912(a), 6824,
6925, and 6933.
Subpart A—General
2.	Section 285.1(e) is revised to read as
follows:
9285.1 Purpoae, scope, and appBcebmty.
**'•*•
(e) The requirements of this part apply
to owners or operators of all facilities
which treat store or dispose of
hazardous waste referred to in 40 CFR
part 268, and the 40 CFR part 288
standards are considered material
conditions or requirements of the part
285 Interim status standards.
Subpart B—General Facility Standards
3. The comment at the end of
paragraph (a) of 9 285.13 is revised to
read as follows:
9 265.13 General waste analysis.
(e) * * •
(2) • • •
f-nmrmmh for example, the facility's
records of analyses performed on the waste
before die effective date of these regulations,
or studies conducted on hazardous waste
generated from processes similar to that
which generated the waste to be managed at
die facility, may be included in the data base
required to comply with paragraph (a)(1) of
this section. The owner or operator of an off-
site facility may arrange for the generator of
the hazardous waste to supply part of the
information required by paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, except as otherwise specified In
40 CFR 288.7 (b) and (c). If the generator does
not supply the Information, and the owner or
operator chooses to accept a hazardous
waste, the owner or operator is responsible
for obtaining the information required to
comply with this section.)
Subpart K—Surface Impoundments
4.	Hie introductory text of 9 285.229 is
revised to read as follows:
9 288£29 Special requirements for
Ignltable or reactive waste.
Ignitable or reactive waste must not
be placed in a surface impoundment,
unless the waste and impoundment
satisfy all applicable requirements of 40
CFR part 288, and:
• * * * * '
Subpart L—Waste Piles
5.	Paragraph (a) introductory text of
9 285J56 is revised to read as follows:
2WuW opoctai requirements tot
Ignltable or reactive waste.
(a) Ignitable or reactive waste must
not be placed in a pile unless the waste
and pile satisfy all applicable
requirements of 40 Oil part 288, and:
Subpart M—Land Treatment
¦ 8. The introductory text of 9 285.231 is
revised to read as follows:
-------
•psPK Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Roles and Regulations
1—i—^^
928&281 Spedal requirements for
ipiitabfe or reactive waste.
The owner or operator must not apply
ignitable or reactive waste to the
treatment zone unless tin waste and
treatment ante mbet aO applicable
requirements of 40 CFR part 288, and:
* * * * * ~
Subpart N—LandfiRe
7.	Paragraphs (a) introductory text
and (b) of § 26&312 aire revised to read
as follows:
J26&312 Special requirements for
Ignitable or reactive waste.
(a)	Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, and in 8 26&316,
ignitableor reactive waste must not be
placed in a landfill, unless the waste
and landfill meets all applicable
requirements of 40 CFR part 268. and;
t 0 . • * •
(b)	Except for prohibited wastes
which remain subject to treatment
standards in subpart D of part 268, -
igni table wastes fat containers may be
landfilled without meeting the
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section, provided that the wasterare
disposed of in such a way that they are
protected from any material or
conditions which may cause them to
ignite. At a minimum, igni table wastes
must be disposed of in non-leaking -
containers which are carefully handled ,
and placed so as to avoid heat, spades,
rupture, or any other condition that
might cause ignition of the wastes; must
be covered daily with soil or other non-
combustible material to n»intmtg» the ^
potential for ignition of fee wastes; arid •
must not be disposed of in cells that
contain or will contain other wastes
which may generate heat sufficient to
cause ignition of the waste.
8.	In S 28&316, paragraph (f) is added
to read as follows:
9 26&318 Disposal of small containers of
hazardous waste lo overpacked drums (lab
packs).
•	O " ~	•	•
(f) Such disposal is in compliance with
the requirements of 40 CFR part 288.
Persons who incinerate lab packs
according to the requirements in 40 CFR
288.42(c)(1) may use fiber drums in place
of metal outer containers. Such fiber
drums must meet the DOT specifications
in 49 CFR 173.12 and be overpacked
according to the requirements in
paragraph(b) of this section.
PART 268—LANQDISPOSAL
RESTRICTIONS
1. Hie authority citation for part 268
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U&C. 6906,8812(a), 682L and
6824.
SiApart A—General
2.	In S 288.1, paragraph (c)(3) is added,
and paragraph (c}{5] is removed, to read
as follows:
ywNkl iVpOI^ICOpi^MQippHBVInj*
W* .
(3) Wastes that are hazardous only
berause they exhibit a hazardous
characteristic, and which an otherwise
prohibited from land disposal under this
part are not prohibited from land
disposal if the wastes:
(i)	Are disposed into a unhazardous
or hazardous injection well as defined in
40 CFR 144.8(a); and
(ii)	Do not exhibit any prohibited
characteristic of hazardous waste at the
point of injection.
3.	Section 28&2 is revised to read as
follows: ¦»
fAMA lUfUllMiaaMalUJiUUIlilaAMl
9*00*2 pomuuwno wppwcMDWi wn pan*
When used in this part the following
terms have the meanings given below:
{a) Hahgenated organic compounds
or HOCs means those compounds
having a carbon-halogen bond which are
listed under appendix ID to this part
(b)	Hazardous constituent or
constituents means those constituents
listed in appendix VQI to part 281 of this
chapter.
(c)	Load disposal means placement in
or on the land and includes, but is not
limited to, placement in a landfill
surface impoundment, waste pile,
injection well, land treatment facility,
salt dome formation, salt bed formation,
underground mine or cave, or placement
in a concrete vault or bunker intended
for disposal purposes.
(d)	Noawastewaters are wastes that
do not meet the criteria for wastewaters
in paragraph (g)(8) of this section.
(e)	Polychlorinated biphenyls or PCBs.
are halogenated organic compounds
defined in accordance with-40 CFR
781.3.
(f)	Wastewaters are wastes that
contain less than 1% by weight total
organic carbon (TOC) and less than 1%
by weight total suspended solids (TSS)>
with the following exceptions:
(1)	P001, F002, FV03, F0O4, FOBS
solvent-water mixtures that contain less
than IX by weight TOC or less than 1%
by weight total F001, F002, F003, F004,
F005 solvent constituents listed in
S 288.41, Table CCWE.
(2)	KOll, K013, K014 wastewaters (as
generated) that contain less than 5% by
weight TOC and less than 1% by weight
TSS. •
(3) K103 and K104 wastewaters
contain less than 4% by weight-TOC and
less thanltt by weight TSS.
(g) Inorganic Solid Debris are
nonviable inorganic solids that are
incapable of passing through a 9.5 mm
standard sieve that require cutting, or
crushing and grinding in mechanical
sizing equipment prior to stabilization,
limited to the following inorganic or
metal materials:
(1)	Metal slags (either dross or scoria).
(2)	Classified slag.
(3)	Glass.
' (4) Concrete (Excluding cementitious
or pozzolanic stabilized hazardous
wastes).
(5)	Masonry and refractory bricks.
(6)	Metal cans, containers, drums, or
tanks.
(7)	Metal nuts, bolts, pipes, pumps,
valves, appliances, or industrial
equipment.
(8)	Scrap metal as defined in 40 CFR
281.1(c)(8).
4.	Section 288.3 is revised to read as
follows:
S26&3 Dilution prohibited as a substitute
for treatment.
(a)	Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, no generator,
transporter, handler, or owner or
operator of a treatment, storage, or
disposal facility shall in any way dilute
a restricted waste or the residual from
treatment of a restricted waste as a
substitute for adequate treatment to
achieve compliance with subpart D of
this part, to circumvent the effective
date of a prohibition in subpart C of this
part to otherwise avoid a prohibition in
subpart C of this part or to circumvent a
land disposal prohibition imposed by
RCRA section 3004.
(b)	Dilution of wastes that are
hazardous only because they exhibit a
characteristic in a treatment system
which treats wastes subsequendy
discharged to a water of the United
States pursuant to a permit issued under
section 402 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) or which treats wastes for
purposes of pretreatment requirements
under section 307 of the CWA is not
impermissible dilution for purposes of
this section unless a method has been
specified as the treatment standard in
S 288.42.
5,	In S288J, paragraphs (a)(l)(ii),
(a)(2)(i)(B),	(a)(3)(ii), and (a)(4) are
revised; new paragraphs (a)(7), (a)(8).
and (a)(9) are added; paragraph (b)(4)(ii)
is revised; the certification in paragraph
(b)(5)(i)	is revised; new paragraph
(b)(5)(iii) is added; paragraph (b)(7) is
removed and paragraph (b)(8) is
redesignated as paragraph (b)(7); the
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 j Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22887
introductory text fc> paragraph (c) ia
revised; and paragraphs (cg3) a£td{c)(4)
are removed, to read as follows:
8 (a) • • * *1UlyaU neonBmf^
(1) ' • V
- (if) The common ding treatment
standards for wastes ITO1-FD05.FQ39,
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
8288.32 orRCRA Sflcffan 3004jd}.
Treatment standards for dl other
restricted wastes may be referenced by
Inrlii/itng nn the notification At
subcategory of the waste, the
treatability group(s) of the waste(a), and .
the QFR sections) and paragraphs
where the treatment standards appear.
Where (he applicable treatment
«t»ndnr^a am mrpronncW an nparifted
technologies In $26842, the applicable
five-letter treatment code found In Table
1 of $268.32 [fi^,TNCIN. WETOX) also
must be an the notification.
(2) * * *
»*"«
. (B) Hie corresponding treatment
standards for wastes F001-RJ05. RJ39,
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
fr28&32orRCRA Section 30M(cB.
Treatment standards for all other
restricted wastesssay be referenced by •
including on the notification the
subcategory of th6 waste, the
treatability group(s) of the wasie(s).and
the CFR sectioned and parayaphs
where the treatment standards appear.
Where the applicable treatment
standards are expressed as specified
technologies in {.28842, the applicable
five-letter treatment code found in Table.
¦ 1 $288.42 (&&, INON. WETOX] ako
must be listed on the notification.
ft	ft	«	ft	ft
(3J * * ' -
(ii) Hie conespaoding treatment
standards for wastes R3O1-F0O5, FQ39,
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
8 288J2 or RCRA section 3004(d).
Treatment standards for all other
restricted wastes may be referenced by
including an the notification the
subcategory of the waste, the
treatability j£THip{&) of the waste(s), and
the CFR sections) and paragraphs
where tin treatment standards appear.
Where the applicable treatment
standards are expressed as specified
technodngies ia S26&42. the applicable
five-letter treatment code found hi Table
1 of i 288.42 (bjl, INON. WETOX) also
must be listed on the notification.
(4J If a generator is managing a
prohibited waste in tanks or containers
regulated under 40 CFR 282 34. and is
trea&tg such waste in such tanks or .
contours to meet applicable treatment
standards under Sohpart O of this part
the generator must develop and follow a
written waste analysis plan which
describes the procedures the generator
will cany oi^t to comply with the
treafenant standards. The plan must be
kept on-site in the generator's records,
and the following requirements must be
met
(1) The waste analysis plan mast be
basedonadetailedriienikaiiagd
physical analysis of a representative -
sample of the prohibited wastefs) being
treated, and contain all information
necessary to treat the wasted in
accordance with the requirements of
thisffmt including the selected testing
frequency.
{ii) Sudi plan nmst be filed with the
EPA Regional Administrator (or his
designated representative) or State
authorized to implement Part 288
requirements a minimum of 30 days
prior to the treatment activity, with
delivery verified.
(iii) Wastes shipped off-site pursuant
to this paragraph most comply with the
no tifi cation imqulnanents of 3288.7(a)(2).
(7)	If a generator is nmaagtag a lab
pack that contains wastes identified in
Appendix IV of this part and wishes to
use the alternative treatment standard
under £288.42, with each shipment of
Waste the generator must submit a
notice to the treatment fadfity in
accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this
section. The generator must also comply
with the requirements in paragraphs
(a)(5) and (a)(6) at this section, and must
submit the following certification, which
must be signed by an authorized
representative;
I aertify under penalty of law that I
personally have examined and aa familiar
-with the waste and that the lab pack contains
only die wastes specified in appendix IV to
part 288 or solid wastes not subject to
regulation under 40 CFR part 2B1.1 am awara
that there are significant penalties for
submitting a false certification, including the
possibility of fine or imprisonment.
(8)	If a generator is managing a lab
padc feat contains organic wastes
specified in Appendix V of this Part and
wishes to use the alternate treatment
standards under 3288.42, with each
shipment of waste the generator must
submit a notice to the treatment facility
in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of
this section. The generator also must
comply with the requirements in
paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(8) of this
section, and must submit the following
certification which must be^igned by an
authorized representative:
I certify under penalty of law that I
personally have examined and am familiar
with the waste through analysis and testing
or through knowledge °f the waste and that
the lab pack contains only organic waste
specified in Appendix V to Part 288 or solid
wastes not subject te regulation under 40
CFR Part 281. Jam aware that there are
significant penalties ior submitting a false
certification, including the possibility of fine
or impdmsMBt
(0) SmaH quantity generators with
tolling agreements pursuant to 40 CFR
282J0(e) must comply with the
uppHiyiKly notification and certification
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section for the initial shipment of the
waste subject to the agreement Such
generators must retain on-site a copy of
the notification and certification,
together with the tolling agreement for
at least three years after termination or
expiration of the agreement The three-
year record retention period is .
automatically extended during the
course of any unresolved enforcement
action regarding the regulated activity or
as requested by the Administrator.
(b) * * *
(4)	* • '
(ii)	Hie corresponding treatment
standards for wastes F001-F005, F038,
and wastes prohibited pursuant to
8 288^2 or RCRA Section 3004(d).
Treatment standards for all other _
restricted wastes may be referenced by
including on the notification the
subcategoiy of the waste, the
treatability group(s) of the waste(s), and
die CFR sections) and paragraphs
where the treatment standards appear.
Where the applicable treatment
standards are expressed as specified
technologies in {288.42. the applicable
five-letter treatment code found in Table
1 of $268.42 [e.g., INON. WETOX) also
must be listed on the notification.
(5)	• * *
W * * *
I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am familiar with
the treatment technology and operation of the
treatment process used to support this
certification and that based on my inquiry of
these individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining this information. I believe that the
treatment process has been operated and
maintained properly so as to comply with the
performance levels specified in 40 CFR part
268, subpart D, and all applicable
prohibitions set faith in 40 CFR 288J2 or
RCRA section 3004(d) without impermissible
dilution of the prohibited waste I am aware
that there are significant penalties for
submitting a fain certification, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment
ft	ft ' ft	ft	ft
(iii)	For wastes with treatment
standards expressed as concentrations
in the waste pursuant to 8288.43, if
compliance with the treatment
standards in subpart D of this pait is
-------
22888
Federal'Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
based in part or in whole on die
analytical detection limit alternative
specified in § 288.43(c), the certification
also must state the following:
I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am familiar with
the treatment technology and operation of the
treatment process used to rapport this •
certification andihat, based on my inquiry of
those individuals immediately responsible for
obtaining this information. I believe that the
nonwastewater organic constituents have
been treated by incineration in units operated
in accordance with 40 CFR part 284, subpart
O) or 40 CFR part 268. subpart Q, or by
combustion in fuel substitution units,
operating in accordance with applicable
technical requirements, and 1 have been
unable to detect the nonwastewater organic
constituents despite having used best good
faith efforts to analyze for such constituents.
I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting a false certification,
inrhiriing the possibility of fine and
tppFia/mniant.
(c) Except where the owner or
operator is disposing of any waste that
is a recyclable material used in a
manner constituting disposal pursuant
to 40 CFR 28&20(b), the owner or
operator of any land disposal facility
disposing any waste subject to
restrictions under this part must:
& Paragraph (a) of 82684 Is revised to
read as follows:
92884 LandflB and surface Impoundment
disposal restrictions.
(a] Prior to May 8,1990, wastes which
are otherwise prohibited from land
disposal under 528833(f) of this part
may be disposed in a landfill or surface
impoundment which is in compliance
with the requirements of { 288.5(h)(2)
provided that the requirements of this
section are met As of May 8,1990, this
section is no longer in effect
* * * • *
7. Section 2684) is added to subpart A
to read as follows:
826M Special ndea regarding wastes that
enhftWi characteristic.
(a)	Hie initial generator of a solid
waste must determine each waste code
applicable to the waste in order to'
determine die applicable treatment
standards under subpart D of this part
For purposes of part 288, the waste will
carry a waste code designation for any
applicable listing under 40 CFR part 281,
subpart D, and also one or more waste
code designations under 40 CFR part
281, subpart C where die waste exhibits
die relevant characteristic.
(b)	Where a prohibited waste is both
listed under 40 CFR part 261. subpart D
and exhibits a characteristic under 40 -
CFR part 281, subpart C, the treatment
standard for the waste code listed in 40
CFR part 281, subpart D will operate in
lieu of the standard for the waste code
under 40 CFR part 281, subpart C,
provided that the treatment standard for
the listed waste includes a treatment
standard lor the constituent that causes
the waste to exhibit the characteristic.
Otherwise, the waste must meetthe
treatment standards for all applicable,
listed and characteristic waste codes.
. (c) In addition to any applicable
standards determined from the initial
point of generation, no prohibited waste
which exhibits a characteristic under 40
CFR part 281, subpart C may be land
disposed unless the waste complies with
die treatment standards under subpart D
of thispart
(d) Wastes that exhibit a
characteristic are also subject to 9 288J
requirements, except that once the
waste is no longer hazardous, for each
shipment of such wastes to a subtitle D
facility the initial generator or the
treatment facility need hot send a
9 2B&7 notification to such facility. In
such circumstances, a notification and
certification must be sent to the
appropriate EPA Regional Administrator
(or his delegated representative) or State
authorized to implement part 288
requirements.
(1) The notification must include the
following information:
(1)	The name and address of the
subtitle D facility receiving the waste
shipment;
(ii)	A description of the waste as
initially generated, including the
applicable EPA Hazardous Waste
Numberfs] and treatability group(s);
(iii)	The treatment standards
applicable to the waste at the initial
point of generation.
(2)	The certification must be signed by
an authorized representative and must
state die language found in
9268.7(b](5)(i).
Subpart C—Prohibitions on Land
Disposal
8. Section 28845 is added to read as
follows:
$26845 WastespecWeprohftWone—
Vkl-J	»	
TTUfQ TraTQ WMwfc
(a) Effective August 8,1990, the
following wastes specified in 40 CFR
261.31 as EPA Hazardous Waste
Numbers FQ08 (wastewaters), F019, and
F039 (wastewaters): the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 28142 as EPA
Hazardous Waste Numbers K002; K003;
KD04 (wastewaters); K005
(wastewaters); K006; K008
. (wastewaters); K011 (wastewaters);
K013 (wastewaters), KD14
(wastewaters); K017; K021
(wastewaters); K022 (wastewaters); -
K025 (wastewaters); K026; K029
(wastewaters); K031 (wastewaters);
K032; K033; K034; K035; K041; K042;
K048 (wastewaters); K048
(wastewaters); K049 (wastewaters):
- K050 (wastewaters); K051
(wastewaters); K052 (wastewaters);
K060 (wastewaters); K061
(wastewaters); K069 (wastewaters);
K073; K083 (wastewaters): K084
(wastewaters); K085; K095
(wastewaters); K098 (wastewaters);
K097; K098; KlOO (wastewaters); K101
(wastewaters); K102 (wastewaters);
K105; and K106 (wastewaters); the
wastes specified in 40 CFR 261.33(e) as
EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers P001;
P002; P003; P004; P005; P006; P007; P008;
P009; F010 (wastewaters); P011 -
(wastewaters); P012 (wastewaters);
P014; F015; P018; P017; P018
(wastewaters); P020; P022; P023; P024;
P027: P028; P031; P033; P034; P038
(wastewaters); P037; P038
(wastewaters); P042; P045; P048; P047;
P048; P049; P050; P051; P054; P058; P057;
P058; P0S9; P060; P0d4; P085
(wastewaters): P086; P067; P088; P089;
P070: P072; P073; P075; P078; P077; P078;
P081; P082; P084; P088; P092
(wastewaters); P093; P095; P098; P101;
Pi 02; P103; P10S; P108; P109; P110; P112;
P113: P114: P115: P116; P118: P119; P120;
P122; and P123; and the wastes specified
in 40 CFR 281.33(f) as EPA Hazardous
Waste Numbers U001; U002; U003; U004;
U005; U008: U007; U008; U009; U010;
U011; U012; U014; U015: U018; U017;
U018; U019; U020; U021; U022; U023;
U024; U025; U028; U027; U029; U030;
U031; U032; U033; U034; U035; U038;
U037; U038; U039; U041; U042; U043:
U044; U045; U046; U047; U048; U049;
U050; U051; U052; U053; U055; U056;
U057; U059; U080; U081; U082; U083;
U064; U088: U067: U088; U070: U071;
U072; U073; U074; U075; U078; U077;
U078; U079; U080; U081; U082; U083;
U084; U085; U088; U089; U090; U091;
U0S2; U093; U094; U095; U098; U097:
U098: U099: U101; U109; U105; U106:
U108; U109; U110; Ulll; U112; U113;
UU4; U115; U118; U117; U118; U119;
U120 (wastewaters); U121; U122; U123;
U124; U12& U128: U127: U128; U129:
U130; U131; U132; U133; U134; U135;
U138 (wastewaters); U137; U138; U140;
U141; U142; U143; U144; U145; U148;
U147; U148; U149; U150: U1S1
(wastewaters): U152; U153; U154; U155;
U156; U157; U158; U159; U160; U181;
U102; U163; U184; U185; U166; U107;
U188; U169: U170:U171; U172; U173;
U174: U178; U177; U178; U179; U180:
U181; U182; U183; U184; U185; U188;
U187: U188: U189; U191; U192; U193;
-------
F.
1 Register / Vci 55. No. 108 / Friday, funa 1. 1990 / Rides and Regulations
22688
U194; U198; U197! U200; U201; U20£
U20& U204: U205; U206; U207: U208:
U20SS U21CC U211; U213; U214; U215;
U2W; U2I7S UHft TK19: U22Q; U22fc
U2ZS; U228; U227; U228; UCa« 1^38;
U237! U23ft U239; U240; U243; U244:
U248; U247; U248; U24B; and the
following wastes identified as
hazardou based on a riinracteristic
alone: DB0U D002, D003, DBM
(wastewaters), D005. D006; 13007; D008
(except for lead materials stored before
secondary smelting). D009
(wastewaters), D010, DOll, D012,D013,
D014, DDIS. D016. andD017 are
prohibited from land disposal.
(b)	Effective November 8,1990, the
following wastes specified in 40 CFR
281.32 as EPA Hazardous Waste
Numbers KD48 (nonwastewaters}. JC049
(nonwastewaters), KD50
(nonwmtewaters), K051
(nonwastewaters). andK052	/
(nonwastewaters j are prohibited from
land disposal.
(c)	Effective May8,1992. theloEtawing
waste specified in 40 CFR 28L31 as EPA
Hazardous Waste Nambers RB9
(nonwastewaters); die wastes specified
in 40 CFR 281.32 asEPA Hazardous
Waste Nambers K091 {nonwastewaters]:
K084 (nonwastewaters); K101
(nonwastewaters); K1Q2
(nonwastewaters); 1C106
(nonwastewaters); the wastes specified
in 40 CFR281.33(e) as EPA Hazardous
Waste Numbers P010(oou wastewaters};
P011 {nonwastewatera); Poc
(nonwastewaters); P038
(nonwastewaters); P838
(nonwastewaters); POOS
(nonwastewaters); P087
. .(nonwastewaters); and P092
(nonwastewaters); the wastes specified
in 40 CFR281.33(f) at EPA Hazardous
Waste Nambers U130
(nonwastewaters); and U151
(nonwastewaters); and the {allowing
wastes identified as hazardous based on
a characteristic alone; 13004
(nonwastewaters); D008 (lead materials
stored before secondary smelting}; and
D009 (nonwastewaters); inoiganic solids
debris as defined in 40 CFR 2B8£(a)[7)
(which «>«n applies tO*himiiiiim
refractory bricks carrying die EPA
Hazardous Waste Numbers KO48-K052);
and RCRA hazardous wastes that
contain naturally occurring radioactive
materials are prohibited from laud
disposal.
(d)	Effective May 8.1992,.hazardous
wastes Hated in 40 CFR288.12that are
mixed radioactive/hazardous wastes
are prohibited from land disposal.
(e)	Effective May 8.1992. the wastes
specified in this section having a
treatment standard in subparts of this
part based on Incineration, mercury
mtaitiji£ at v&ificatien, and which are
contaminated soil or debris, are
prohibited from land disposal.
(f) Between May 8,1990 and August 8,
1990, the wastes included in paragraph
{a) may be -disposed of in a landfill or
surface impoundment only if such unit is
in compliance with the requirements
specified in 8 2885(h)(2).
" (g) Between May 8,1990 and
November 8.1990. wastes included in
paragraph (b) of this section may be
Hlapnaaij qf in a luiWll nr mrrfnrn
tapoaadment oaly tf such is in
t!HHHf this section may be
disposed of in a Landfill or surface
Impoundment «dy if such unit is in
compliance with the requirements
specified in g 2885(h)(2).
(i)	The requirements of paragraphs (a),
lb), tc), (d), and (e) of this section do not
apply it
(1)	He wastes meet die applicable -
standards specified hi subpart D of this
part
(2)	Persons have been granted an .
wrmpHnn from a prabfMHmi pursuant
tea petition under 12884, with respect
to those wastes and units covered by
the pefitton;
(3)	The wastes meet die applicable
ogfoKHyfraj
paisuant to a petition granted under
$28844;
(4)	Persons have been granted an
extension to effective date of a
proUbkkm pnrsHnat to 8 288.5, with
respect to these wastes covered by the
extension.	~-
(0 To determine whether a hazardous
waste listed is 8 288.10,288.11, and
288.12 exceeds the applicable treatment
standards spedfied in 88 288.41 and
the initiflj ywBWtnf mnul t(wt a
representative sample of the waste
extract or die entire waste, depending
on whether the treatment standards are
expressed as concentrations in the
waste ertract. or the waste, or the
generator may vm knowledge of the
waste. IT the waste contains constituents
in excess of the applicable subpart O
levels, the waste is prohibited from land
disposal, mill ail requirements of part
288 are applicable, except as otherwise
specified.
9. Section288.40is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to read
as follows:
S26&40Appficab(Bty of treatment
standard*.
(a) A restricted waste identified in
? 288.41 may be land disposed only if an
extract of the waste or of the treatment
residue of the waste developed using the
test method in appendix I of this par*
does not exceed the value shown in
Table CCWE of 8 288.41 for any
hazardous constituent listed in Table
CCWE for that waste, with the following
exceptions: D004, D008, K031, K084,
KlOl KM2. P010, P011, P012, P038, P038,
and UU& Wastes D004, D008. K031,
IG384, K201, K102, P010, P011, P012, P038,
F03& and 0138 may be land disposed
only if an extract of the waste or of the
imuhwwii residue of the waste
developed using either the test method
in Appendix I trf this part or the tBst
method in appendix ~ of part 261 does
not exceed the value shown in Table
CCW of 8 288.41 for any hazardous
constituent listed in Table CCWE for
that waste.
» • « • •
(c) Except as otherwise specified in
9 288.43(c), a restricted waste identified
in 8 288.43 may be land disposed only if
the constituent concentrations in the
waste or treatment residue of the waste
do not exceed die value shown in Table
CCW of 8 288.43 for any hazardous
constituents listed in Table CCW for
that waste.
10. Section 288.41 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and Table
CCWE—Constituent Concentrations in
Waste Extract, to read as follows:
128841 Treatment standards expressed
as concentrations bi waste extract.
(a) Table CCWE identifies the
restricted wastes and the concentrations
of their associated constituents which
may not be exceeded by the extract of a
waste or waste treatment residual
developed using the test method in
Appendix I of this part for the allowable
land disposal of such wastes, with the
exception of wastes D004,0008, K031,
K084, K10L K102, P010, P011, P012, P038,
P038, and U138. Table CCWE identifies
the restricted wastes D004, D008, K031,
K084, K10L K102, P010, P011, P012, P038,
P038, and U138 and the concentrations
of their associated constituents which
may not be exceeded by the extract of a
waste or waste treatment residual
developed using the test method in
Appendix I of this part or appendix II of
40 CFR part 281 for the allowable land
disposal of such wastes. (Appendix n of
this part provides Agency guidance on
treatment methods that have been
shown to achieve the Table CCWE
levels for the respective wastes.
Appendix II of this part is not a
regulatory requirement but is provided
to assist generators and owners/
operators in their selection of
appropriate treatment methods.)
Compliance with these concentrations is
required based upon grab samples.
-------
22890 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1,1990 / Roles and Regulations
Table CCWE.—Constituent Concentrations in Waste Extract
Mlula	• -
nssn oom
Sag am
*- - - - - - *— *	*
nOQUBM mummxrt conswuent
CAS number
fOr rojUHWO
harmrtmm
OOftttttUOflt
concentra-
tion (mg/l)
0004-
TabtoCCW(n26&43_
OOOS-
Tabto CCW In 26&43_
0006-
Tabto CCW tn 26&43-
0007-
0008-
Tabto CCW tn 268L43-
Table CCW in 268.43-
Ananlo-
Barium-
Cadmiuu-.
Chromium (TotaO-
0009	(Low Menwy Oubcatopwy .
lass than 260 mg/kg Mercuy).
001	0	
0011.
Tabto 2 In 28842 and Table CCW In
26043.
Tabto CCW in 26843.
Mercuy-
Tatte CCW in 26843-
FOOI-fOOSl
Tabto 2 h 268.42 and TaUa CCW in
26843.
Selenium-
Savor	
Acetone-
FOO0-
Tabta CCW In 26843.
F007-
T6bto CCW'in 26843.
POOS.
Table CCW In 26843-
POOS.
Table CCW In 26843-
F011.
Table CCW in 268.43.
F012.
Table CCW In 26843.
P019-
F020-F023 and F026-F028 dtadn
Table CCW In 268.43.
ivSwtyt alcohol.
1*1. A	^	m -
UMDOn O8U0Q0h
Carbon I
CNoraberoam
Craaota (and craayOc add).
Cydohaxandna.
1,2-OicttorotenzBne «
Ethyl acetate	
Ethyttwnene	
Ethyl ether	
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-8
7440-47-32
7439-02-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
87-64-1
71-38-3
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-00-7
108-94-1
95-60-1
141-78-6
100-41-4
60-29-7
Mathyleno chloride.
Hi Hi a ^1^4 « -»	
¦ranyv wnyi Ratono-
Mothyl isobutyl ketone
1,1^-TricWoro-1A2-Tetrifluorethane_
TilUtfuiuothyume	
I WBUiwUUWIIHUMIW				
Xylene		
Cadmium™____
78-83-1
67-66-1
75-9-2
78-83-3
108-10-1
98-95-3
110-88-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
71-55-8
78-13-1
79-01-6
75-89-4
Chromtan (Total)-
Cadmium-
Qvomium (Total) -
Nckel.
9DW «m
CacMur
Chramhan (TotaQ.
Mefcal.
SBmt.
Cadmium.
Chromium (TotaO-
racket.
SBvar.
Cadmium.
Ctoomhon (Totai).
Nfckal-
Cadmium.
Chromium (Total)
Star.
Chromium (Total)-
HxCO&AD Hexachloro(a>eng>p-tfiox'
ins.
HMCOP^a HexactHorop-
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-02-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-22-4
¦7440-47-32
PaCOFVUI PortlacNorodibenzolufans—
TCOO-AB TefracNorodbarao-p-diaK-
feHL
24>Tttchlorephenol.
2.4,6-Trtcftlorophenoi.
I** A* A
88r06-2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
aos
5.0
1.06
aos
ais
2.82
0.125
0.65
aos
aos
0.05
5.0
02S
0.20
aos
0.0S
0.66
1.12
a079
1.12
1.0S
1.05
0.062
0.05
0.05
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<1 PPD
<1 PPb
<1 Ppb
<1 PP*»
<1ppH
<1 PP»
-------
Federal " Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22891
Table CCWE.—Constituent -Concentrations m Waste Extract—Continued
Wntooods
See also
Regulated haiarrtoiit constituent
CAS number
tor regulated
hazardous
GQAStttUBflt
concentra-
tion (mg/l)
Notv
stswatt
concentre*
lion (mg/l)
FQ24.
K001-
KDQ2-
K003.
K004-
K005-
KD08 (anhydrou)".
K006 (hydrated)J
K007
KD08.
K01S-
K02T.
K022-
K026-
K031.
KD48-
KD48_
' KD49-
K090-
K051.
K062-
K061 (Low Zhe fluhcatngoty ten
than 18% Total 2nc).
KDQ2-
Trtie CCW In 268.43.
Table CCW in 26843.
Table CCW In 26843.
TaUa CCW In 26643-
Table CCW In 26843.
Table CCW In 26843-
Table CCW in 26843-
TaWe CCW in 268.43-
Table CCW in 26843-
Table CCW in 26843.
Table CCW in 26843-
Table CCW In 26843-
Tabie CCW in 268.43-
Tabte CCW in 26843.
Table CCW In 26843-
Tabla Cdw In 26843-
TaMe CCW h 26843-
Table OCW in 26843.
Table CCW in 26843.
Table CCW in 26643-
TabieCCWini
Table CCW in 26843.
Table CCW In 26843.
2A4Q-Tetrachlorophenoi-
Rantaciitautihenol	
Chromium (Total)	
58-00-2
Antimony.
Barium	
Cadmium^
Cfiramlum (TotaO
'***
Merauy.
Selenium.
Chromium (Total)-
Chromium (Total).
Chromium (Total) -
Chromium (Total).
Chromkan (TotaO-
Chromlum (Total)-
Chromium (TptaO-
Chromkm (Total) -
Chremkan (Total).
Antimony		
Chromium (Total).
Nklml.———.
Chrom!unk(TotaI)-
Lead	¦
Chromiun (Total)..
fcflrl nl
RKNH
Chromium (TotaQ.
Chromium (Total)-
Nckal	
Chromium (TotaQ-
Chromkan (Total).
Nickel——.
CaiMum-
Chromium (Total).
KD69 (Calcium SUIata SubcatugoiyV	
KD71 (Low Mercury. Subcategory
Ina than 18 mg/kg Mercury).
' ~
Table CCW In!
Table ffin 26842 end Table CCW in
¦ 26843.	
Table. CCW In
Chromium (Total)-
CaMun.
Mercury.
H084-
Table CCW In 28843.
K068-
Tabla CCW In 26843-
Table CCW In 26843-
Araanle.
Chromium (Total).
K087.
K100-
Table CCW In 2B843.
Table CCW In 26843-
Cadmkan.
Chromlum (Total).
K101.
K102-
Kt06 (Low Meraay Subcategory—
lees than 260 mg/kg Mercuy—reel-
dues from RMERC).
K108 (Low Mercury Subeategory-
- less than 260 mg/kg M«rcury—that
are not residuea from RMERC).
Table CCW in 26843.
Aiaanlc.
Aisertc.
Table 2 In 26842 and Table CCW In
26843.
Tabta2ln 26842 and Table CCW In
26843.
Merewy.
Mercury.
87-88-6
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-02-0
7440-38-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
743942-1
7439-87-6
7440-02-0
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7439*92-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7439-88-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-38-0
7440-47-32
7440-02*4
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-02-0
7440-38-2
7439-82-1
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-43-9
7439-82-1
7439-87-8
7440-02-0
7440-38-2
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7439-82-1
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
7439-07-8
7439-87-8
<006 ppm
<001 ppm
NA
NA
NA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<0.05 ppm
<0.01 ppm
0073
0021
0.068
023
50
62
0.066
U
041
0.026
0J32
5.7
0.072
0.51
0.094
0.37
0.094
037
0.094
037
0.094
0J7
0.094
0.37
52
0.094
037
0094
0l37
1.7
02
023#
52
0l32
a073
0.021
0.088
SO#
ais
1.7
020
1.7
020
1.7
020
1.7
020
1.7
020
ai4
52
024
0l32
a094
027
an
024
ao2S
0088
5.6#
0094
027
051
0068
52
asi
so#
5.6#
020
0.02S
-------
22892 Federal Regster / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table CCWE—CowsiHUhwt CowaafiRAnows m Waste Extract—Continued
Waste coda
Sea also
Regulated hazardous conaOluent
CAS number
far regu lated
¦ hawdous
constituent
Wastewaters
concentra-
tion (nig/1)
Norv
wastewaters
concentra-
tion (ntgVl)
¦Ml*
TaW* CO**
	
7440-02-0
NA
032



»—pwwtaatmanttt—tarda haw baan baaad on g Laachatoanatysja but Ms doaa not preclude ttie use otTCiP analysis.
Hww woflto codes not obutMrtud into wntMatm MtfRonwutBinton.
NA—Not Appficabta. -	.
. TablfCCWE—Constituent CtMcatTRATioNS for Waste Extracts
Watfecotfe
Seeafeo
CommafctaT cfwpicsimnw
Roputotod h&zsntous
constituent
CAS number
for regulated
hazardous
con^tttwent
| *» - * ¦ .. A -	
wastewaters
concentration
(ma/I)
concentration
(fng/1)
P010.
P011-
P012-
P013-
P0Q8-
TatoteCCWto26&4a	
Table CCW to 26&.43U—.
^VoBVBw BDBm
Table CCW to 268l43l___
TeMsOCWfe)268i43k
P038-
P06S (Low Mercury Subcate-
gory—fess than 260 mg/kff
Mercuy*aa!dues Bom
RMERCX
P065 (Umt Martuy Subcat^
gory leu Ban 280 mg/kg
Mercury-lndnarator raat-
dun (and are rat residues
from RMERCJ).
Tabia COW In 268.43	
Table CCW in268.43	
TaUe 2 to 26042 and Tabte
OCVV In268.4a
TaM»2to28&42andTatol»
OCWk»&4a
Arsenic pantoodde-
raoBnB WOwDBi
Barium cyanfcte-
DIcMoraphenyiaratoe.
OteUiylaialno-
Araanto-
Arsenic.
Arsenic.
Mo«uiy Mnlnaia.
Merauy.

Mercury .
P092 (Lor Mercury subcate-
gory—lesa than 260 mg/ta^
Mercury mtfduea (ram
RMERQl
P092 (Low Memny Subcate-
gory—leas .
U204	
Table CCW to 2B&43	
Tafela-OCW to 268.43.
U209.
Tabte COW to 268L43 and to
Table 2 to 268/42.
Table CCW In 2S&43 and
TaMa2tom4Z
Tabia CCW to 268.43	
TabtoCCWto26&<
Lead phosphate.
Lead sub
Mercury.
Chromium (Total).
Arsenic -
lead
laart
Mereuy-
Mercury:
Mercury.
Selenium dlofldda-
Selenium sulfide.
Selenium.
Selenium.
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
7439-97-6
7439-07-6
7440-02-0
7440-02-0
7439-97-6
7439-97-6
7440-22-4
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7439-92-1
7782-49-2
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-38-2
7439-92-1
7439-92-1
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7782-49-2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—'TTjeee aaatment standards h»e been based on gLeactaiaanalysia but Ms does not pracfade me use at TCtPewaiysia-
*—These waste codas aw not subcataacrtead lntowoirtwintors and r
NAp-ftat AfpScsMa.	'
Section 288.42 is amended by revising
paragraphs (a) introductory text and
(a)(2). by removing paragraph8 (a)(3)
and (a)(4), by revising paragraph (b). .
and by adding paragraphs (c), (d), and
(e) to read as follows:
126142 Treatment standards expressed
asspeclttodtechnuloMlee.
(a) Hie follbwfng wastes In
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this
section and in Table 2 and Table 9 of
this section must be treated using die
technology or technologies specified in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) and Table 1
of this section.
•	O	•	+	•
(2) NonHquid hazardous wastes
containing halogenated organic
compounds (HOCsj in total
concentration greater than or equal to
1,000 mg/kg and liquid HOC-containing
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22693
wastes that are prohibited under
S 26&32(e)(l) of this part must be
incinerated in accordance with the
requirements of 40 CFR part 284, subpart
O or 40 CFR part 285, subpart O. These
treatment standards do not apply where
the waste is subject to a part 268.
subpart C treatment standard for
specific HOC (such as a hazardous
waste chlorinated solvent for which a
treatment standard is established under
§ 288.41(a)).
Table 1.—Technology Codes and Description of Technology-Based Standards
Doacnpaon of nonKNQHNMa sonon
Vsnttng of compressed gases Into an absorbing or reaulSig medta (La, sofld or Bqukl)—venting can be accomplished through physical release utSztng
values/piping; physical penetration ol the oontainet; and/or penetration through detonation.
Amalgamation of Hqukt HmwnM mercury oorrtarrtnated with radoactlve materials ulSzsng Inorganic reagents such as copper, zinc, nickel gold, and
flutfur that result In a nonflquiOL tanMoU ffn&lgsffl and thereby reducing potential emissions of elemental morcuy vapors to tfio air.
Btodegradatlon of organica or norHwetaBc Inorganics Oa. degradable Inorganics thai contain the elements of phosphurua. nHrogen. and sulfur) In units
operated under either aerobioor anaerobic conditions such that a surrogate compound or Indicator parameter has been substantially reduced in
concentration In the residuals (ag, Total Organic Carbon can often be used as an Ncator parameter (or the btodegradatlon of many organic
constituents that cannot be directly analyzed In wastewater residues).
Gabon adsorption (granutsted or powdered) ol non-metafflc Inorganics, organo-metaflfcs, and/or organic constituents, operated such that a surrogate
compound or Indicator parameter has not undergone breakthrough (ag, Total Organic Carbon can often be used as an incScator parametw lor the
adsorption of many organic constituents that cannot be cfiractty analyzed In wastewater residues). Breakthrough occurs when the carton has
become saturated with the constituent (or indicator paramotei) and substantial change In adsorption rats associated with that constituent occurs.
Chemical or oloctiolytlc oxidation utBzJng the following oxidation reagents (or waste reagents) or combinations or reagents; (1) Hypochlorite (e.g.
bleach); (2) chlorine; (3) chlorine dknddR (4) ozone or UV (ultraviolet light) assisted ozone: (5) parotides, (6) persulfates; (7) percWorates; (8)
permarigantes; and/or (8) other oxidizing reagants of equkralent efficiency, performed In units operated such that a surrogate compound or Indicator
parameter has been substantially reduced in concentration in the residuals (e.g, Total Organic Carbon can often be used as an Indicator parameter
(or the oxidation of many organic constituents that cannot be directly analyzed in wastewater residues). Chemical oxidation specifically includes what
¦ Is commonly reftnied to as alhalno cHorinatlon.
Chemical reduction utttlng the following reducing reagents (or waste reagents) or combinations of reagents. (1) Sulfur dioxide; (2) sodium, potassium,
or aftafl salts of sulfites, Usullites. metabisulfttes, and putyeUiytaw glycols (eg, NaPEG and KPEG); (3) sodium hydrasutflde; (4) femxn salts; and/
or 0) other reducing reagants of equivalent efficiency, performed In units operated such that • surrogate compound or indicator parameter has
substantia^ reduoed ^concentration In the residuals (04. Total Organic Halogens can often be used as an ImSeator parameter lor the reduction of
many haloganated organic constituents that cannot be dbeutfy analyzed in wastewater residues). Chemical reduction is commonly used tor the
iwiwon of wiBMm wiroiiiin 10 dw wwww wa.
Deactivation to remove the harartlim characteristics of a waste due to 8s Igrttabttty, eorrosMty, and/or resctMty.
Fuel substitution In units operated In accartanoe with appfcabte technical operating requirements.
VHiMcatlon of Ngh.level nUd ratfloecttve wastea In units in compliance with afl applicable radioactive protection requirements under control of the
Nucteir Regulatory Commission.
liOnautlon of wastes containing organica and mercury In units operated In accordance with the technical operating requirements of 40 CFR part 264.
subpart O and 40 CFR part 265, subpart 0. AS wastewater and nonwastewatar residues derived (rem this process must then comply with the
..cotraspondbig treatmeitt standania per wests code wtth consideration of any applicable subcategories (e.g, High or Low Mercury Subcategories).
Incineration in units operated In accordance with the technical operating requirements of 40 CFR part 264, subpart O and 40 CFR part 265, subpart O.
UquM-aquiri extraction (often referred to as solvent extraction) of organica from Squid wastes into an Immiscible solvent for which the hazardous
constituents have a greater solvent affinity, resulting in an extract high in organica that must undergo either Incineration, reuse as a fuel or other
recovery/reuse and a-raWnate (extracted Squid waste) proportionately low in organica that must undergo further treatment as specified in the
Macreencapsufaaon wBh surface coating materials auch as polymeric organica (04. resins and plastics) or with a jacket of inert inorganic materials to
substantially reduce aurtaoe eiposure to potential leaching medto. Macroencapsulatlon specifically does not include any material that would be
classified as a tar* or container acoording to 40 CFH 260.10-
KeutraBattan vrtth the tofloaring reagents (or waste reagents) or combinations of reagents: (1) Adds; (2) bases; or (3) water (including wastewaters)
resulting In a pH greater than 2 but less than t£5 as measured In the aqueous residuals.
No land disposal based on recycling.
Chemical precipitation of metals and other Inorganics as Insoluble precipitates of addes, hydroxides, carbonates. sulfides. sulfates, chlorides. Bounties.
. or phosphates. The Mowing reagents (or waste reagents) are typically und atone or in combination (1) Ume 0a. containing oxides and/or
hydranhtes of calcium and/or magnesium; (2) caustic (Lei, sotium and/or potassium hydmddea; (3) aoda ash 0a. sodum carbonate); (4) sodium
- sulfide; (B) fsnfostfate or ferric chloride; (6) alum; or (7) sodhan sulfate. AddWonal floculatlng, coagulation, or stmSar reagents/processes that
enltanue sludge dewatsring characteristics aw not precluded hw> ws.
Thermal recovery of BeryMum.
Recovery/reuse of compressed gases including techniques auch as reprocessing Of 'the gases (or reuse/resale; Storing/adsorption of impurities;
ramfadng (or dkaet reuse of resale: and uae of the gsa aa a fuel source.
Recovery of edda or bases utBzIng one or more of the following recovery technologies: (1) OfaUHaBon (Le^ thermal concentration); (2) ion exchange;
(3) ream or. solid adsorption; (4) reverse osmosis, and/or (5) incineration for the reoovery of acid—Note, this does not preclude the use of other
physical, phase separation or concentration techniques auch aa dacantaflon. IBM anon (Including ultrafiltration), and centrtfugation. when used Li
conjunction with the aboM toted recovery technologies^
Thermal reooMry of lead In secondary lead smeRera.
RMorthg or roasting In a thermal processing unit capeble of votatffldng mercury and aubeequently condensing the vdatUred mercury tor recovery. The
retorting or wasting untt (or facMty) must be subject to one or mere of ttte following (a) A National Emissions Standard for Hazardoua Air Pollutants
(PESHAP) (or mercury; (b) a Beat Avaflable Control Technology (BACT) or a Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) standard tor mercury
Impoeed pursuant to a Prevention of Slgnlllcanipelailutallcn (PSD) permit or (c) a state permit that eatabBshea emission limitations (within meaning
of Section 302 of the Ctoan Air "Act) tor mercury. Al wastewater and nonwastewatar residues derived from this process must then comply with the
-oorreapondng treatment standards par waste code wtth consideration of any applicable subcategory (04* High or Low Mercury Subcategories).
Reoovery of metals or Inorganics uffizing one or more of the following (tract physical/removal technologies: (1) Ion exchange; (2) resin or solid (La,
. zeofites) adsorption; (3) reverse osmosis; (4) chelation/aofrent extraction^ (8) freeze aystaflzatton; (8) ultrafiltration; and/or 6 simple precipitation (la..
. crywtaHratlon) Note: this does not preclude, the use of other physical phase separation or concentration techniques such aa dacantaflon, Btratlon
Qndudhg uftiafiHiattun). and centrtfugation. when used In conjunction with the above listed recovery technologies.
Reoovery of otganics utttdng one or mow of the foflowtng technologies: (1) OWBation; (Z) thin ffim evaporation; (3) steam stripping; (4) cartoon
adsorption. (5) cMoal Add extraction; (0) Squid-liquid extraction; (7) predpttaOon/crystafltiatlon (indufing freeze crysttfBzation); or (8) chemical pi
separation techniques (U» addWon of adds, bases, demuhWeta. or slmiar chemicals); Note: This does not preclude the use of other physical p
separation techrtques fauch as decantatlon. fltratlon Ondudhg ultrafiltration), and centrtfugation, when used in conjunction with the above listed
ftoovery tochnoloQtoft.
Thermal rocovary of metals or inorganics from non wastewaters In units defined in 40 CFR 260.10. paragraphs (1). (6), (7), (11)^ and (12). wdar the
oovnon Ov ^nou8DVTfUfnso8s^«
-------
22694 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 10fr / Friday, June 2, 1990 / Roles and Regulations
Table 1.—Technology Oooes and OescmpnoN of Technology-Based Standards—Continued
Tactmotaggr
Description of technnfcujy hwied ntfliviifd
RZINC
STASt.
SSTRP
WETQK
wthhk
ResmeMng in tor the pvpon'of raoovny of zinc high temperature metal recowy unite.
StaMlliallon w8h 9 ap8cw8d in wft fliapuawL
WW air aaddaflenportennod to ub8s operated such that a aunopate compound otindteatorpaa»atar has been substantially reduced In concenfratan
It the residuals (eta.Total Oganb Gubon can e&en be used aa an indicator parameter (01 the oxidation of many organic constituents that cannot
be (flreefly analyzed to wastewater residues}.
GanboSetf raaeSoa witb water tor highly mnrltim faorganlc.ar organie chemical* wife precautionary controls far protection at workers from potential
1 weft as precautfonaiy controls tor potential amission* of toafcflgvttable lewta of gases released during the reaction.
beaiment standard the ordar of appteailon Is specified In
"tb." (an abbreviation for "followed by"), then the Ave
Mors 1: When a cornWnaUon of then tethnotaglea &al. a twalment Mr) is nedfled as a
<268.42, Teua 2 by Moating the five letter technology coda that must ba applied fnt, then the
fatter technology code for the technology that must be qtpfletf next and so oni
Mtn« 2 When more thaw one tedinBloflr (or beabnent tain} aw anecHted as aSsmaffve treatment standards, the Ave totter
trains) am separated by a semicolon (J with tto last tethnutugy preceded by tha word "OH". This Indicates that any one of these 80A'
tiafnt eaft ho twflfi hy	itWh the*
r codes (or tha treatment
1 or treatment
Table 2.—Techmology-Based Stanoarosbv ROTA Waste Code
oode
See alto
Wasta daauipttjia and/or twalment subcategory
CAS No. far
Technology code
DOOI
DOOt
DOOt
DOOT
DOOt
DOOT
Dtftt"
OOC2
D002
D003
0003
0003
0003
0006
Dooa
0009
0009
00t2
0013
0014
D01S
0019
0017
RX»
Table CCW kl 26&43-
IgnHaMB UqukfS based on 261.21(a)(1)—
igmtable tiquMs based en 281Jl(aKl{—tow
TOC tgritabte UqJds Subcategory—Cess than
KM total uwiaiifcj caibun
Ignllabte Liquids based on 261.21 CaKU-High
TOC lyiWaUe Uquidb Subcategory—Greater
than or equal to 10* total organie carbon
tgnfliiMw oompressetf gases based on
281-21(a)(3).
20t-21(aX2)
OxMzers based on 261.21(a)(4).
Table CCWE to 2684*
andTabiaCCWln
Table CCWE to 26&4T
and Table CCW In
28&43L.
Ta» OCWh268*3—
-Add subcatBflwy based on 261.22(8X1) _
Aflka&w subcategory based on261.22(bK1)-
Othar oorrosfws based on 201.22(a)(2).
FleacHvo sutlldea based on 26r.23.
TiWaGCW in 2B&43	 2A6-TP
Table CCWE In 26&4t
and Table CCW to
268^43.
eoot-ss-t
94-75-7
93-73-t
OEACT
NA
NA
NA
NA
OEACT
OEACT
OEACT
OEACT
OEACT >
OEACT
OEACT
NA
NA-
NA.
OEACT.
FSU8S; RORGS; or
1NCIN.
OEACT**.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
DEACT.
RTHRM.
M£AOl
RUBK^orRMERC.
79-494
NA
BtOOe.-arMCHt
CMUItorlNQN
WETDX;orMCm
KOOQjorWCIM
CHOWJtOOOGrorlNCIN
CH09S% or MCW
(WETOX or CHOXO) ft CARS*
orMCM
RI4ERC.
NA.
NA.
NA.
NA.
NA.
NA.
INCtNL
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Roles and Regulations	22695
Table 2.—Technology-Bass) Standards by RCRA Waste Code—Continued
code
See also
WMfr descrtpaons and/or Oeabuwl subcategory
CAS Na tor
regulated
constituents
Technology code
FOOS
F024
K02S
K028
K027
K039
K044
KIMS
K047
K061
K069
K106
K113
K114
K11S
K116
P001
P0Q2
POOS
POOS
pooe
P007
P008
POOS
P014
P01S
P018
P017
P018
P022
P023
P028
P027
P028
Table CCWE In 268.41
andTatteCCWln
Table CCWE In 26&41
and Table CCW In
2S&43.
DIWIWW flODOni ffOnl OiO pBOMCWi 01 fWP^
boBM by th» station of
fl» |	I	aiOi * - ** -	^ I	«	^
Seftppmg to ttM von vw pfooucson ov iwoiyi
.•Li	-i . —
ooiyi pymm
^ a ia ¦ — — ^—-A *~¦***-«i_ 		1a.	i^iiuma
GenowQS ana flwWMfl roaouas ran toueno
dhoojMMtepwductfofl.
fllffCSlaftM Ow	dtettiytphoaphoro-
annuo acnaiineproaucoon or pnorus.
Wastewater trntaant aludoaa ben flw nmuteo-
. trtig and processing of explosives.
Spent whIxih bom ttie treatment of wastewater
Table CCW in 268.43	
Table CCWE la 2B&41
and Table CCW In
2S&43.
Table CCWE In 268.41
and Table CCW In
268.41
containing s^HotIvos.
Pink/red water Irani TNT operations.
Emission control dust/sludge from the primary
pwrturtloo at steel In electric furnaces (Wgh
Zlno Subcalogory prontor man or atpal to
15% total Zinc).
Enfeeiett control dust/sludge from eeoondaiy
lead smelting Neo-Celcium Sulfate g">»—mj"-
*¦ 		
Wastewater treatment atudpe from the mercury
089 process n cnoana pbocuctopi cntgn Mer-
cury SMfacatagory-flrBater than or etpnl to 2B0
mg/kg total mercury).
^	j - - - - -^ — .1J	- _ — J _			¦!	
wOnQBftsaQ KgUM! tiQnl OnOS iTOn) TO pUnUCSDOD
of tobienecfiamlne in tfio production of toliMO^
Jl - -I- a • -» —	-				- - ^ J—f	A — »	
owrone vn nyurogonmon ov uuwiuiucusnB.
yianaiB iron) mo punncaoon o» qommquiw *»
the production of totuBnotflanrin® hydroQflfr
BDOn Ov UffUUUwlUBflOl
Heavy enda from the purification of toluenetSame
la the pnoducSon of lolueneitaninevta hydro-
gonaoon oi (Miaioimwit
recovery
column In the production of toluene (Ssocyarv
ate via phosgeraaon of toluenedbmlntt.
Warfarin <>03%)	
l-Acetyl-2-ihiouraa.
Acrolein , , ,
AOyl-alcohoL
Aluminum phosphide.
S-Amlnoethy) 3-iaoatazolol-
4 ftmlnSpyiMne	
Ammonium piccsle _
iroopnenoi ibaasns dot) -
BeryOundugt.
Bls(chlorome(hy1)etber_
Brudne_
Table CCW in 268.43	
n I, ^ - - -m- ¦» «
wBIOOn QaUwQvo
ChlocoocfltnMflhydo ¦
H»CUoraphenyQt
tHMwOPrapONBaDa
^	-M L ' 1 ' '
omnsj^owonrm , ,
110-80-6
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
i
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
81-81-2
591-08-2
107-02-8
107-18-8
20859-73-8
2763-08-4
504-24-5
131-74-8
108-88-5
7440-41-7
542-88-1
598-31-2
357-57-3
75-15-0
107-a0-fl
5344-82-1
542-78-7
100-44-7
BIOOG: or INON
MCW
U£XT ft SSTRP ft CARBN; or
mem
mom
CARBI* or INCIN
CARBN; or INON
OEACT
OEACT
OEACT
NA
NA
NA
CARBN; or INON
CARBN; or (NON
CARBN; or INCtN
CARBN; or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or mem
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
CHOXD; CHRED; or INON .
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCIN
'(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCIN '
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BI006; or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD). ft CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or mem
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or mem
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
ormem
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or mem
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INON.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INON.
OEACT.
OEACT.
OEACT.
NLDBR.
RLEAD.
RMERC.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INON.
mem.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INQN.
CHOXD; CHRED; or
INQN.
INCIN.
INCtN.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
OffiED; or INQN.
INON.
RMETU or RTHRM.
INCIN.
INON.
INON,
INON.
INCIN.
INQN:
INON.
INQN.
-------
22896 Federal-Register / Vol 55, No. 108 / Friday, Juna 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table ^—Technology-Based Standards by RCRA Waste Code—Continued
waste ooacnpaons qm/qi treatment obocaiBgofy
CAS N& far
(wrarrtniw
OOHStttU0fltS
Technology code
Nonwastewatars
P031
P033
P034
P040
P041
P042
P043
P044
P04S
P048
P047
P049
P084
P0S6
P067
P068
P062
P064
POOS
P068
P087
P068
P069 "
P070
P072
P07S
P078
P078
P081
P082
P084
P08S
P087
P08S
P092
P092
P093
P0S8
PO90
Cyanogen.
Cyanogen chMtto-
feCycloheoiyMAtfnitraphenol-
0^-Pethyl O-pyrazinyl phoaphaolhloata
Otethytp-nfrophenyl phosphate	
C|ilmyhWntt
DQsopropytRuoroptiosphata (DFP)_
OfnUdtOStBtHMMMMMMMMMMMNB
INotunoK-
alpha. aft>h»OlnwthylphenelH)(land»e.
4,6-Oinitro-oooso< salts	
2,4-OitMobiureL.
Table CCW In 26643-
AzkkSne.
Ftuorlne-.
460-19-6
806-77-4
131-89-5
297-07-2
311-46-6
61-43-4
66-91-4
60-61-6
39196-18-4
Table CCWE In 26841
" and Table CCW In
28843.-
Table CCWE In 26841
and Table CCW in
26843.
RuoroflPBtamfcte^
Ruorotcette add, 8otifafln88ft»
§ ¦ - - - * - - - i -*
nocyanto ftrtti, etnyi aster..
Mercury AiMnatae (High Mercury Subcategory
greater thai or equal to 260 mg/kg total Mer-
cury—either iminerator residues or residues
from RMERC).
Mercury Mminater (AO nonwastewatars that ara
not incinerator residues from RMERC; regard-
less of Mercury Content).
2 MnlhylailiMlna-
Mstfiyl hydrazine-
122-09-8
634-62-1
641-63-7
161-66-4
7782-41-4
640-19-7
62-74-8
628-86-4
628-66-4
16752-77-6
76-66-8
60-34-4
wowyniicwaraer
Akficarb	
76-88-6
116-06-3
l-Naphthyf-2-tMourea.
racotbis and satta-
Nttrle oxide
Nitrogfycerfn..
64-11-5*
10102-43-9
10102-44-0
55-63-0 •
Table CCW in 26843	
N-NUroaotflmaOiytamine-
ti irti., I. - — iiitii i 11 * — * —
rwwrawwuiyiwyaimnB..
OclanwlhylpyiBphosphorainlda-
Osmkan estroddo	:	
EndothaO-
Tabie CCWE in 26&41
and Table CCW In
Table CCWE in 268.41
and Table CCW In
28843.
Phenyl mercury acetate: (Mgh Mercury Subcato-
gory—greater than or equal to 260 mg/kg total
Meruuy aBhoi lndnerator residues or resi-
dues from RMERC).
Phenyl tnarcuy acetatac (An nonwastnwatota that
era not incinerator residues and aw not rn^
dues from RMBWi regardless o> Mercury Con-
tent).
pumwyiHiiiifta
62-76-9
4649-40-0
152-16-9
20816-12-0
146-73-3
62-38-4
62-38-4
103-85-6
75-44-6
7803-61-2
CHOXD; WETOX; or INCIN
CHOXD; WETOX 0»

INON.
CHOXD; WETOX; or INCIN
CHOXD; WETOX; or

INON.
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
or INCIN

CARBN; or INCIN
FSUBS; or INCIN.
CARBN; or INCiN
FSUBS; or INON.
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft) CARBN;
INON. .
orlNON

CARBN; or INCIN
FSUBS; or INON.
CARBN; or INON
FSUBS; or INON.
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
or INCIN

(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
or INCIN

(WETOX or CHOXD) ft) CARBN;
INON.
or INON

(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
orlNON

(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
orlNON

NA
ADGAS lb NEUTR.
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
or INCtN

(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
orlNON

CARBN; or INON
FSUBS; or INON.
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
INON.
orlNON

NA
RMERC.
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD) (b CARBN;
orlNCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INON
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ: or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) 
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 108 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22697
table 2.—Technology-Based Standards by RCRA waste Code—Continued
Sw*o
Wosto ^Q0criptioM ftostsioflt subcsto^Qfy
CAS Na for
constituents
Technology code
Nonwastewslsrs
PI 02
P10S
PI 08
PI 09
P112
P113
PtIS
P116
P118
P110
PI 20
PI 22
U001
U003
U008
U007
U008
U010
UOIt
U014
U0T9
uoie
U017
U020
U021
U023
U028
U033
U034
U03S
U038
U041
U042
U048
U049
U053
U055
uose
UC57
U0S8
U099
U082
U064
Sodknazkfe.
Siyctinlno
TrtianBiuiualhane-
TahteCCWh 288.43	
Tatfe CCW In 268^3.
ThaSeodde.
TUtn (I) atftata-
TMuwiilurtwalda.
^ *->-«¦ - • - ' - ¦
MOKIUMNWItfUGinOi -
Table CCW in 263.43	
Table CCW In 288.43.
Ammonium vanadate-
Vaiimliwi pailuridw
Zinc Phosphide (<10%)_
AcetaktohydB		
TabtoOCW
-------
22898 Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table 2.—Technology-Based Standards by RCRA Waste Code—Continued
Sea also
Waste descriptions and/or treatment mbcaleQory
CASNoi tor
wgulatBd
hazardous
Technology ooda
Nonwastewaters
U073
U074
U08S
U088
U087
U089
U090
U091
U092
U003
U094
U09S
U098
U097
U09S
U099
U103
U109
U110
U113
U114
' ITI15
U116
U119
U122
U123
U124
U125
U128
U132
U133-
U134
U13S
U143
U147
U148
U149
U150
Sd'-OfcNoratwratfni
ds-1<4-0lciriaro4-tutane	
ti»»-1,4^)ichloi®-2-toutene_
1,23^-Otepootyfautane..
Q,0-01ethy< S-methytdithlophospftata-
Dtothyi trtB»strcl_
91-04-1
1478-11-6
1484-43-4
1815-60-1
3288-68-3
Dflrydiusahote.
3^-Omellwxytoamldine
Dtmeuiytamm.
66-63-1
Tabte CCW In 268.43	
p-OimBttiytamlnoaeubamane-
a.S'-OlmettiySMrakSna-
a^-DimeChyl benzyl hydroperoxide.
ufliwuiymiuuiiiyi Graonooa
1,1-0imea-
1^-ObnethyBiydneina-
Obnathyt sutfata.
1,2-Ofphenylhydrazlne-
apropytemlne 	
Ethyl acrytatn
A	*-»- iftHi 1II ¦ i Ji i — I ,	' -»
unywne nHsnocafijsfrac 8CQ«
Ethytona aaddo-J	
Ethylene thiourea-
Ethyl methane sulfonate-
94-68-8
119-00-4
124-40-3
621-00-9
67-07-6
119-03-7
80-15-0
79-44-7
57-14-7
540-73-8
77-78-1
122-66-7
142-84-7
140-88-6
111-64-6
78-21-6
08-45-7
6240-0
f	| . —' J
ruuiuu Boa.
Furan-
Furfural-
Qtyddaidehyda.
HtauiuWumjheiiaiie-
Tabte CCW In 26a43_
iiyorogen rjounoft..
Hydrogen Sufflde^
\ BflfcXTBtptoW ¦ ¦
. L » » ¦
Mawc annyGnoo H
Maionorttrfle-
Ueiphalan-
64-18-6
110-00-8
98-01-1
786-34-4
70-30-4
302-01-2
7664-39-3
7783-08-4
303-34-4
I
108-31-8
123-33-1
109-77-3
148-82-3
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX Or CHOXD) fb CARBN;
orlNON
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INC1N
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
CHOXD; CURED; CARBN;
BIOOQ; or INON
CARBN: or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or MCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orMON
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INCIN
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD)-1b CARBN;
or INCtN
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ: or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or MCIN
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ; or INCIN
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ; cr INON
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ; or INON
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ: or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
or INCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or MCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNON
CHOXD; CHREO; CARBN;
BIOOQ; or INON
NA
CHOXD; CHREO, or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or mem
.(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
INON.
INON
INCIN.
FSUBS; or INC1N.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INCIN.
FSUBS; or INCtN.
FSUBS; or INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INCtN.
INON.
INCIN.
FSUBS; or INON.
INCIN.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INON.
INON.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INCtN.
FSUBS: CHOXD;
CHRED; or INCIN.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INON.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INCIN.
CHOXD; or INCIN.
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
FSUBS; or INCIN.
INON.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
OWED; or INON.
ADGAS fb NEUTR; or
NEUTR.
CHOXD; CHRED; or
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INCtN.
INCtN.
INON.
-------
Federal Register / Vol 85, No. 106 / Friday, Jane 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22699
Table 2.—Technology-Based Standards by RCRA Waste Code—Continued
Seeadso
W&sts descriptions And/or biuitiiMit subcalBQory
CAS No. for
Iwiiwlrnw
oofvtttuonts
Technology codo
Nonwastewaten
U18t
U1S3
U154
U156
U160
triaa
U164
U168
U187
U168
U171
(1173
U176
ui^r
U178
U182
U184
U16S
U188
U191
U193
.11194
U197
U200
U201
11202
U206
U213
U214
U21S
U218
U217
U216
U219
U221
U222
11223
U234
U238
U237
U238
TaMs CCWE in 268141
sndTaUe CCW in
Mercury: (Hgtt Mercury ttobtatopoiy Qroatnr
than or equal to 260 mg/kg total Mercury).
Math|l cHoroceibonato-—
MeB nil athyt tatone permdde_
NUr^j ftp	ftl |H^ ¦¦ ¦¦ i unlifc. n
nnVSO mWQaOpVwMVfi
MnthylthfcHniill		
I^Naphthoqulnone-
1-NapMNyamine_	
Table CCW in 26843	
2-NapMMyamlns-
k< ttU—	_ **	¦	« - -
w-fucow) <1 o omanoummq,
fmitioa^N-oOiyturoa	;	
N-Mtroao-N-mathylurea	
u i n*., . —	i ,»l	.
muraw n iiwoiyweinaiie •
D—Matyfa
I
PentacMoroettiane .
1,34'entaJww..
Phosphorus su&de.
2-Plcoena	„
1,3-Propane suttone-
n-Propytamine-
p-Oomoqulnone-
Raaaplne-
Sacchartn and salts-
Streptoiatudn.
Table CCW in 268.43-
Ttable CCW in 268.43-
Table CCW in 26843-
Ttfito CCW in 26843.
(I)i
ThaUim(l)(
Thafflum (1) chlorida-
ThaBum (l}nNrata_
TNouraa-
Tobenedamine—.
- - - >- * - ¦ ¦ ' •
o»iuwmw nyoRMrapnoBa
Toluene dncy8Mto«
sym-TrMtrobenxene—
Trypan Blue.
UmcS mustard.
7439-87-8
74-83-1
87-68-1
79-22-1
1338-23-4
70-25-7
130-1S-4
134-32-7
91-69-8
79-48-0
1116-64-7
759-73-8
684-83-6
615-53-2
123-83-7
78-01-7
604-80-8
1314-80-3
109-08-8
1120*71-4
107-10-8
108-61-4
SHM
108-48-3
81-07-4*
18883-88-4
109-89-8
6533-73-8
7791-12-0
10102-45-1
62-65-8
82-66-8
25378-4S-8
638-21-5
28471-62-8
99-35-4
BHhJ ¦ ii A i ¦¦ i ¦ ¦
Gb^ CwfPBnWWn
72-57-1
68-75-1
81-794
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
CHOXD; CHRED; CARBN;
BIOOQ; or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) fb CARBN;
orlNON
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
OrlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INCtN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
NA
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
- orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
Of INGIN
(WETOX or CHOXD) ft CARBN;
or INON
CHOXD; CHRED; or INON
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
or MON
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
orlNCIN
(WETOX or
or INON
NA
NA
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
CHOXD)
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
(WETOX or CHOXD)
or MON
(WETOX or- CHOXD)
orlNCtN
CARBN; orlNCIN
(WETOX or CHOXD)
orlNCIN
CARBN; or INON
(WETOX or CHOXD)
orlNCIN ,
(WETOX or CHOXD)
orMCIN -
(WETOX or CHOXD)
or MON
(WETOX or CHOXD)
orlNCIN
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
ft CARBN;
RMERC.
INCJM.
FSUBS; or INCtN.
INON.
FSUBS; CHOXD;
CHRED; or INON.
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
CHOXD; CHRED; or
INON.
INON.
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
WON.
FSUBS; or INON.
RTHRM; or STABL
RTHRM; or STABL
RTHRM; or STABL
RTHRM; or STABL
INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
FSUBS; or INON.
INON.
INON.
MON. '
INON.
-------
22700
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 108 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table 2.—Technology-Based Standards by RCRA Waste Cooe—Continued
code
See also
Waste descriptions and/or tieatnienl gJbcaMpory
CAS No. tor
hazardous
corattuems
Technology code
Wastewaters
Nonwastewatera
U240
U244
U246
U248
U249
A 4 »«-«-»	1- -U- - - -» - - « - -»
z.4-«cnioropnanojiyaconc (sans and estersj.
THram „ , .	,. . .
Cyanogen bramhto.
94-75-7*
137-26-8
506-68-3
Warfarin (greater than or equg to 3%)_
Zhe Phosphide (<10%)		
81-61-2
1314-84-7
(WETOX or CHOXO) 8) CARBN;
or WON
(WETOX or CHOXD) lb CARBN;
orWCW
CHOXO; WETOX; or INON
(WETOX or CHOXO) ft CARBN;
or (NCtN
CHOXO; CHHED; or INON
INON.
INCtN.
CHOXO; WETOX; or
INCtN.
FSUBS; or INC1N.
CHOXO; CHRED; or
INON.
•CAS _	_		
" TNs waste coda exists In gaseous norm and is not categorized as waotowutsr or norwsontnmitor forms.
NA—Not Applicable.
Table 3.—'Technology-Based Standards for Specific RADtOAcnvE Hazardous Mixed Waste
Waste code
Waste descriptions and/or treatment subcategory^
CAS Number
Technology code
WoSwWalofS
Nonwastewaters
0002-
D004_
D005-
0006.
C007-
00081
0008..
0009-
0009-
Ratfioactive High Level Wastas Generated During the Reprocessing of Fuel Rods Subcate-
gory.
Radoactlve High Lewi wastes 43enereted During the Reprocessing of Fuel Rods Subcate-
001*
Radoactlve Hgh Level Wastes Generated During the Reprocessing at Fuel Rods Subcate-
gory. .
RatSoactlve Hgh Level Wastas Generated During the Reprocessing of Fuel Rods Subcate-
gory.
Raifioacflve High Level Wastes Generated During the Reprocessing of Fuel Rods Subcate-
goty.
Radioactive Lead SoCda Subcategory (Note: these lead sctids include. but are not Bmited to,
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22701
S 288.41, { 288.43, and Table 2 of this
section.
12. Section 288.43 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and Table
CCW—Constituent Concentrations in
Wastes, and by adding paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
} 268X3 Treatment alandaids wqimirt
as waste coitc6iitistloii8»
(a) Table CCW identifies the
restricted wastes and the concentrations
of their, associated hazardous
constituents which may not be exceeded
by die waste or treatment residual (not
an extract of such waBte or residual) for
the allowable land disposal of such
waste or residual. Compliance with
these concentrations is required based
upon grab samples, unless otherwise
noted in the following Table CCW.
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes
iif,	~ ~ ~
WBfliB 0000
Regulated haimdous ooroSuani
CAS No. for
hazardous
COAStftUOftt
		A —	
nBOUWulOfs
concentration
(mg/l)
concentration
(mg/kg)
0003 (Reactive cyanfctoa mbcateoo-
ly—based on 281.23_
Cyartdes (Amenable).
Cadmium	
Chromium.. • .
Lead	;	—
Cyanides (Total)	
Cyanides (Amenable).
Chromium (Total)	
Lead	
Nckei	
Cyanides 14
•0.014
-------
22702	Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1900 / Rules and Regulations
———^—¦—^—————^^
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
VYBSE0 0009
See al»
ftoQutstod tastious oonsffiuont
CAS No. for
hazantous
constituent
ooncwUiattuw
FQ2S (UghC ends subcategory).
FQZS (Spent ffltara/akb and
cants auteaSaguA.
F039-
TaMe CCWE in 26&41.
Blsg-ettiyihwyOphthalate.
Ovarium (Totai.
Nickel	
nihfihwm
1,2-OlcMoroethane	
1,1-acNoroethylane..
|*>. t ¦ ¦ * - _a . i i
canon isoacraonoo.
1,1,2-TrtcMoroetfttne.
» » « » •« *
inoBoroeinywne	
Vinyl chloride _____
Chlorofawn	
»»-*»¦ « ¦	-«-« —«j _
MBinyvBno cnvnoBM
^^ i ¦ - ¦	-«_»—»_»_
vBIDQn WFBCfiQWWw
1.1^TrtcWoroeftane-
-a.1	*i.—a—- —
i ncroorowiiywnff		
» »— -* 11 a, 11 i | .
vwiyv crooniiB—
HancNorobanzana-
HaaMChlororthana—
Acetone ________
AoanapMMns.
Acettnitrte™
a^cetyUmlnoSuorane-
117-81—7
87-72-1
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
67-6fr-3
107-06-2
79-38-4
75-0-2
56-23-6
79-00-6
79-01-8
75-01-4
87-66-3
75-9-2
58-23-5
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-01-4
116-74-1
87-68-3
67-72-1
87-64-1
206-06-8
83-32-9
75-05-8
9B-8S"2
AUtfcu
4-Aminoi)ipf>eny4_
AnBne	
Anftracana	
AradortOie.
Arodor1221_
Arador 1232-
Arodor 1242_
Arodor1248_
Aroctori2S4.
Araderl260.
eipfta-BHC	
beta-BHC.
dafta-BHC-
QHnWIRrW***
Sento(a)anthrac8ne—
Benzo(b)ftioranttiena-
BamoOOIIuawrthene-
BamoU)perytene_
8erao(a)pyrene.
53-96-3
107-13-1
309-00-2
92-67-1
62-53-3
120-12-7
12674-11-2
11104-28-2
11141-16-5
S3469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11066-82-5
319-84-6
319-85-7
319-88-8
56-89-9
71-43-2
56-55-3
205-99-2
207-08-9
191-24-2
50-32-8
BramodeMarametttana.
Bramomethana (methyl bromide)	
4-flronwphenyt phenyl after
n-eutyl alcohol.
Butyl banzyl phthalate
2-aeo«utyM,6-(flrttroptwnol-
* - - «- » « «
Lflraon wrocraonoe-
Cabon
-------
Federal Register / VoL 85. Wo. 106 / Friday. Jane 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22703
Table CON.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
Waste code
Sot also
Ragulatad hazardous constituent
CAS No. for
hazardous
conmituont
Wastewaters
concentration
(mg/l)
Cresd (nv and p-teomersJ-
CydotWxanone-
1,2-OB>romo-3-chloropropane	
1,2-Dtxonioethane (Ethylene (Sbro-
rridel
2.4-OlcMo»utiMiu»)(ttu)tlc add (2,4-
OU
ojf-000.
108-94-1
96-12-8
108-93-4
74-95-3
94-75-7
w-opo-
Ap'-OOE-
Pf'-OOE.
ftp'-DOT-
p^-WTT.
Nienzo(aJi)anthracene -
ntOicMorobenzene	
»PcMorobenzene.
p-Ofchtcratenzene..
UKiuonnauoromeinane-
1.1-Olchloroethan	e	
1.2-Oichloreethane..
1,1-Ofchtaoethytene	
trans-lj-OlcMoiaethene-
"2.4-Ochlorophenot_	
2,frOcMoropt)enol-
1 9JV+rtnmpmpnrvi •
«•*«-< .aJMrJllnffympa. v»
tran»-1.3-Olchloropropene	
OUdrin	
omnyi pmnam.
pOmethytamlnoazobenzBne-
£4-0hnethyl phenol	
Obnethyl phthatate-
Ohvbutyl phthatate.
1>OMttobenzene-
%4-OMtrophenol..
2^0fnSrotoluene_
2#CWtrotokiene_
OMMCtylphthalata..
13-Ojphenyl hydrazine
IXXinM	
OtadfOton	
Endosulfanl	
EndosuKan II 	
Endosulfan sulfate.
Endrtn.
Endrln aldehyde.
Ethyl acetate.
Ettiyl cyanide _
Ethyl benzene-
Ethyl ether_
bts(2-Elhy
-------
. i : ,	.	• . i • i
22704 Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 /-Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
- * - —«-
WtWlfl 6000
See also
Regulated fwwftHfff constituent
CAS No. for
hmdous*
oomtHufinl
concentration
(mg/l)
Non-
wastewaters
concentration
Hi |L ,, , nL I
MB«noBqicnor •>
4.< Molhyiono-bb^-chloroanlllne?-
Metliytane cttioride-
Mottiyt ethyl ketone	
Mothyl laobutyl tetooa-
Metty methaoyiata.
j| ¦ Ifc A	M	
RMwiyv vnenansuDonaxB*.
Mothyl paraMoo.
ii. ,lHi ..I., ,
Nttprauuno
72-43-6
58-49-5
101-14-4
78-09-2
78-93-3
108-10-1
80-62-6
pjfltroanfflne-
NBiotanama.
S-Nltro-o-toiukflne-
M | ft*- - — >		 - ¦
4-foDopnenoi«
U >Hh. ii ¦ ill i tfc I ii	ii
fHwWWflOiyiOTro ,
N-NHrosotSmethylamine .
N-Nttro*xfrivbutylaniine—.
NWresonwUiyleUiylaniiw-
M-fClrmonxxphofine	
N^ttroaoplpeiUna.
298-00-0
91-20-3
91-69-8
100-01-6
88-85-3
M g* *
100-02-7
55-18-5
62-75-9
924-16-3
N-Nttroeopyrro&fine.
59-89-2
100-75-4
930-55-2
56-38-2
PanlacWacbergBne-
PttttacMonxfiMnzo-p-dkBdns	
Pentachtoranttrobenzane
PemacMoraphenot ___
608-83-5
Phenanthrene-
PropananltiOa (ethyl cyanide).
82-68-8
87-86-5
62-44-2 .
85-01-8
108-85-2
298-02-2
107-12-0
23950-58-5
Pyrana-
Pyridbte-
Safrote-
SBmx (2.4.5-TP)-
2AS-T.
1A4A-Tolrttchlorobenzsne -
TeifttdilMwflwHffrfurana—
129-00-0
110-86-1
94-59-7
93-72-1
93-76-5
98-94-3
.2A7,8-TetiachlorodibenzD-p-dtadn-
1.1.1 ,2-To(i acHoroethane -
1,1A2-TatracWofoethane_
2&4,6-Tetfactiloroph8nol -
Totuene	
Tmaphene	
1^,4-TrtcHorobenzsoe-
1,1,1-Trtcwaoemane-
1,1 ^-Trichtaoemane-
TJihla ¦¦ i a Ii i ¦
Tncnwroeoiyiane
2,4^-TrtcMoroph«na<-
2A6-
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday. Jane 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22705
Table COM.—Constituent Goncentratioms m Wastes—Continued
lit .	
wusaoooa
See also
ftaQufatad fimrtm constfluant
CAS No. (or
hazardous
constituent
(m9")
Non-
wastewatera
cuncattiation
K002.
KD03.
K004.
Kooe.
Kooa.
K007.
K008.
Table CCWE In 26&41.
Taui OCWE In 288.4t_
Table CCWE in 26&41-
Table CCWEIn 26M1-
Tabto OCWE in 26841.
Table CCWE—	
Tatte CCWE In 288.41.
K009.
K010.
K011.
K013-
K014.
K01S.
TaWe CCWE in 268.41.
Kote.
K017-
K018-
KBT9-
Panachlorophend-
Ptwnanttnane.	
Toluene.
Xylenes (TotaQ.
Chraanfcan (Total).
Lead-
Chromium (Total).
Lead-
Chromium (Total).
Chromium (TotaQ -
Lead
Cyanktaa (Total)—
Chromium (TotaQ -
Lead.
Chromium (TotaQ.
Cyankfea (Total) _
Chromium (Total)
unuuK)nn«
CHorafom.
Acetonttrte-
Acrytanitifle.
Aoytamide-
Cyanide (Total) -
Aceiortlille	
Aaytontttie	
Cyanide (Total) -
I	, n.n ¦
Aoatonnrae	
AerytardMe „
AaytamUo.
Cyanide (TotaQ.
Anthracene-
Benxai cMoride.
Sua of Benzo(b)ftuoramt)ene and
Bonn(k)fluoranthena.
PtMMnHunwtt
Toluene
Chromium (TotaQ.
f^BUQl		
Haaachlorotoenzene—
HnacNarabutadiene-
HaaacMorocyclopentaifiene.
HaxacMoreethane.
TetncMorOethene——.
1,2-Olcfttoropropane _
1 A3-Tiichtoropropan» -
Rs(2TricMoroberaene.
1.1.1-Trichtooethane	
1,2-OicMoroethane	
87-86-5
85-01-8
129-00-0
108-88-3
7439-02-1
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
57-12-5
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
57-12-5
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
67-66-3
67-68-3
7S-0S-6
107-13-1
79-06-1
71-43-2
57-12-6
7S-05-8
107-13-1
79-06-1
71-43-2
57-12-5
75-0S-8
107-13-1
79-06-1
71-43-2
57-12-5
120-12-7
98-87-3
203-99-2
207-08-9
85-01-6
108-86-3
7440-47-32
7440-02-0
118-74-1
87-68-3
77-47-4
67-72-1
127-18-4
78-67-5
96-18-4
111-44-4
75-00-3
75-34-3
107-06-2
67-72-1
87-66-3
67-72-1
76-01-7
71-55-6
111-44-4
108-90-7
67-66-3
106-46-7
107-06-2
66-73-7
87-72-1
91-20-3
83-01-8
95-94-3
127-18-4
120-62-1
71-55-6 .
106-93-4
• 0.031
•0.031
•0028
•0.028
•0.032
•0.037
*23
*3i4
'Z9
'3.4
'US
*3.4
*2.9
"3.4
*a74
*2.9
'3.4
'2S
"3.4
*0.74
"2.9
*3.4
0.1
ai
38
aoe
19
ao2
21
38
aoe
19
0.02
21
38
ace
19
ao2
21
1.0
028
0.029
027
0.15
032
0.44
•0.033
•0.007
•0.007
•0.033
•0.007
*,0 0.85
',0 085
•.@0.033
•0.007
•0.007
•0.007
•0.007
•0.033
•0.007
•a007
•0.007
•0.007
•0.006
•0.007
•0.008
•0.007
•0.007
•a033
•0.007
•0.007
•aoi7
•apo7
•0023
•0.007
•0.007
-------
22706
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 /¦ Friday, Jung 1, 1990 /. Rules and Regulations
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations jn Wastes—Continued
Waste code
Seealao
Repulamd haitHrtnmt constituent
CAS No. far
restated
hazardous
constituent
Wastewaters
concentration
(mg/l)
1.1A2-Tatfachlo>aethan6-
K021 —
K022L
Table CCWE in 268141-
Tattle CCWE m 26&4t_
qtoutunn , ,
<"¦ . A . . « II Ian II III || J ijil
uvoon wOacnonoe.
Antimony _	
Toluene	
Ophanytanine.
70-34-8
1Z7-1S-4
67-66-3
56-23-6
7440-38-0
106-86-3
96-88-S
22-39-4
88-30-6
Sura o< Qptanytanrine andOiphenyi-
K023.
Chromium (TotaO-
Mefcet-
K024-

KQ28-
Table CCWE in 268.41_
PMhato ' aiihnllda (meaaaed
n «lift
mono 8CKQ.
piKnaw wnymn ¦ {pleasured
BkaAkAAA ¦ .iifl
nUnBK oOQ|>
1.1.1.2-TetracMoroethane.
1.1Aa-TrtracMururthaiw-
1.1.1-"Wefti03th8ne	_
1.1.2-TrieWorotfiane_
Cartrtum_
Ctamkm (Total).
lead	
KQ29.
K030.
Mcfcet	
CMorotarm	
1,2-Oicrtoroethane	
1,1-Oicftlulhylene-
1.1.1-fricMoroethane-
¦*«- ' liiln ilili
. viiyi uuuue.
^QcNQfobflnuMii
'p-OfcNomlMiuene..
HexacNorcbutadene-
I Iniaf.hlonjtMtiuflojH)-
HexacNoraprapeni
MntBcNerabemene-
PentacMoraetftane..
kwn.
K032.
Table CCWE in 288.4t_
ti2AS-Tetreohtorat)anien»_
TetracMoroethane	
t^,4>Ti4cMorebenzene	
Haxachlorapeniaifleiw
f>tnw4ana
108-05-2-
7440-47-32
7440-02-0'
85-44-0
85-44-0 ¦
75-34-3
87-88-3
87-72-1
76-01-7
830-20-8
79-34-8
71-65-6
70-00-8
127-18-4. -
7440-43-0
7440-47-32
7430-02-1
7440-08-0
87-88-3
107-06-2
75-35-4 .
7t-65-6
75-01-4
95-60^1
106-46-7
87-88-3
87-72-1
1888-71-7
808-83-5
78-01-7
95-84-3
127-18-4
120-82-1
7440-38-2
77-47-4
57-74-0
KOX.
' ' - - -m-». - - I -1^
nspacnof epowoe»
K034.
K03S-
Itexachlofocyclopentadiene	
MoncMflfnewelMMntMfiMiA
rWMwlRUiWjVN|WHOUIBIwMM«w«aMMM
1024-57-3
77-47-4-
77-47-4
83-32-0
Anthracene-^
Benz(a)anthra
8amoWp)wne_
Ctvyaene-
120-12-7.
56-85-3 .
SO-32-8 '
OCntiMMtnoan.
HUorana.
Mano(1,2d-cd)pyren&.
ffitewt# (m- and p-iaomara) -
218-01-0
53-704
208-44-0
88-73-7 .
103-39-5
o-ereaoL.
Ptwnanthrane.
K038-
K037.
Pyrene	
ObuHoton.
Dtatfoton_
91-20-3
85-48-7
85-01-8
108-85-2
129-00-0
K038 .
Tatuene.
K040.
K041.
K042.
Thuflpfmnfl
1,2,4,5-Tetr&cNorobenzene _
296-04-4
106-88-3
298-02-2
298-02-2
8001-35-1
95-94-3
95-50-1
•0.007
•0.007
*0.048
*0.057
•aeo
*0.080
0.010
*052
*0.40
NA
aoso
. 0-35
0.47
*0£4
•034
•0.007
•0.Q33
•0.007
•0X133
•0.033
•0.007.
•	0.007
•	0.007
•0.007
•0JXJ7
6.4
0.35
0.037
0.47
0.46
021
.0.025
0.054
0.27
•0.008
•0.008
•0-007
•0.033
NA
NA
•0.007
•0.017
•0.007
•0.023
0.79
*0.057
*0.0033
*0.012
-0.018
*0.057
*0.057
NA
NA
'0.059
NA
'0.059
NA
*0.068
NA
NA
*0:77
*0.059
'0.11
* 0.059
0.039
'0.087
*0.025
"0.025
*0.080
0.025
0.025
"0.009S
*0.056
" *0.088
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22707
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
Waste code
See also
Regulated haywitaw constituent
CAS Nq tor
regulated
hazardous
constituent
concentration
(mo")
K043.
oOcMorataRnna.
PantactdarabenaM.
1,24-TrtcMorobenzene-
2>-OlcNorephenol-
ZftOcMorephanel-
K040-
K048_
VgbtaCCWE In 26&41~
Table CCWE In 26841.
K049-
Tatta CCWE in 26441..
K050.
Table CCWE in 26&41.
K0S1.
Table. CCWE In 26&41-
K0S2-
Table CCWE In 28841.
2A5-TricMorophenol_
2A8-TricMaraphenol	
Ttftrachtauphenota (Total)-
Fantaclilorophanoi——
108-48-7
6084M
120-62-1
120-63-2
87-68-0
M A
08-06-a
87-88-6
79-01-8
HgMcHorodawaop-cacxlna	
PantacftlorodtenzoiMtoins	
Lsad.
Berao(a)pyrene-_-—_
Bteg-ethythaxyl)p
-------
22708
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
Waste eode
Sea also
mguatsa ndimiiniw comment
CAS No. tar
regulated
hazardous
constituent
Waotowators
concentration

pCresoi-
2;40methytplMncl.
Sh»B»eniene___
Pfearanthrene.
108-44-6
105-87-8
100-41-4
oi-aa-3
65-0V6
Cyanides (Total)—
Chrerafcjm (Total).
Land
KB8C-
Barao(a)pyrene.
KDB1.
MDBS.
MW0 COVE ta 368.41 art TaMa 2
In 26042.
Table CONE In 26&41
Cyanidea (Total).
Cadmium	
Qvornkjm (Total).
KckaL.
Chromium (Total).
KD69-
K071.
M73.
Table CCWE to 2684J
*•28142.
u %
T*tecc»ctea6a4i_
and Tibial
IVGRBIn
Cadmium.
Morcuy-
^ *	» - -».»—ij
.wanon tauacnonQa.
riiiiihwii
M083.
Tablo CCWE i) 2S&4U
MracMoroethane—
Tatracttoroethene	
t,1 >Trichlocoelhane-
Anfine.
Oipnenytamine-
Sum of Ofphenytamtna and Dtphenyt-
irtuuimilna.
108-05-2
108-68-3
57-12-5
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
71-43-2
50-32-8
91-20-3
108-05-2
57-12-5
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-02-0
7440-47-32
7439-82-1
7440-02-0
7440-43-9
7439-82-1
7439-87-6
56-23-6
67-68-3
67-72-1
127-18-4
71-65-6
71-43-2
82-53-3
22-39-4
88-30r6
WS84_
K085-
MckeL
CNorobenzene __
oOchlorobenxane..
m-OlcNorobenzane-
pOfcNorobenzene.
13,4-Trich)orob9nzene-
124,5-TetracWoraberaene..
PentacMorabemeno	
ItaaiJilumbertmne	
feodor 1018	
Aroctar 1221	
1pm
98-95-3
108-66-2
108-94-1
7440-02-0
7440-38-2
71-43-2
108-90-7
95-60-1
541-73-1
106-48-7
120-82-1
95-94-3
Aredor 1242.
1248.
1254.
K088.
Table CCWE In 268.41.
1260.
Aeatapttenone __.
Bia(2-ethy(he«yl)p»rthatet9-
ivttatyi alcohol-
606-93-6
118-74-1
12874-1, 2
11104-28-2
11141-16-5
53469-21-9
12872-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-62-6
87-64-1
aa_AO_4
A. - ** - - —	- * - - -
suyonuyipnoinw*
U-OcMorobenzena-
Oethyl phthalate.
117-81-7
71-36-3
65-68-7
108-94-1
95-60-1
Dimethyl pMMate.
tto-butyl phthatata.
GMtfldyli
Bhyl acetate.
Mafhyl ethyl ketone-
Mathylone cWpride,
84-66-2
131-11-3
64-74-2
117-84-0
141-76-6
100-41-4
67-56-1
108-W-1
76-03-3
75-09-2
•0.011
•0.033
•aoii
•0.033
•6.039
•a047
•0.011
•aoii
•a028
04
0.037
*••0.17
'•• 0.035
'••0.028
'••0.042
13
1.61
0.32
0.51
0.44
. 032
0.04
0.44
1.6
0.51
0.030
*0.057
*0.046
'0.055
'0.056
'0.054
'0.14
'0.81
*0.52
*0.40
NA
'0.068
0.039
0.38
0.47
0.79
*0.14
*0.057
'0.086
*0.036
*0.090
*0.055
*0.055
0.055
*0.055
*a013
*0.014
*0.013
*0.017
*0.013
*0.014
*0.014
0.28
0.010
*0.28
5.6
*0.017
0.38
0.088
*0.20
*0.047
*0.057
*0.017
*0.34
*0.057
*5.6
0.14
029
— *0.089
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22709
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
Waste code
See <
Regulated hszsfdous constituent
CAS No. tor
regulated
hazardous
uumUtuent
Wastewater*
concentration
(mg/l)
K087.
TafateCCWEIn 268.41.
K093.
K094.
K09S.
K096.
K097.
K098-
K099-
K100-
K101-
Table CCWE in 268.41_
K102..
Table CCWE in 268.41.
K103.
K104.
KIOs.,
Toluene.
1.1,1-
T lihli I ¦ tfc -*	
incraominyww.
Xylenes (total)	
Cyanides (Total) _
Chmrium (Total) -
Lead	
Chrysene	
Ruoranthara.
91-20-3
98-8S-3
108-68-3
71-fiS-S
79-01-6
57-12-8
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
208-96-8
71-43-2
218-01-9
206-44-0
tndano(1^3-od)pyrene_
Phenanthrene.
Toluene	
Xylenes	
Lead	
Phthafie anhydride (measured as
PMhafleadd).
Phthafie anhydride (measured as
BbduJU ..|J>
nUIIIWt men).
1,1,1 j-Tetrachkxoethane.
l,1£2-TetracNoreethane_
1,1,1,2-Tetrachioroethane-
1,1^2-TetracMoroethane-
Tetrachkyoethene	
1.1.2-Trichioroethane	
Trichloroethene
l>OicMorebenzene-
PentacMoroethane—
1.2.4-TrtcMorobeniene-
HeiachloiocycMwinatflene-
193-39-5
91-20-3
85-01-8
108-68-3
7439-92-1
85-44-9
85-44-9
630-20-6
79-34-6
127-18-4
79-00-5
79-01-6
67-72-1
78-01-7
630-20-6
79-34-8
127-18-4
79-00-5
79-01-6
541-73-1
76-01-7
120-82-1
77-47-4
57-74-9

2,4-Otchtorophenoxyacc(tic acid.
HexacMoredB>enzo-p-(Soxins—
1024-57-3
8001-35-1
94-75-7
PenlachlwodttienzoHHtelna	
Penlachloroditwniofuiaiw	 M
TetracMorotiMrao-p-daxins	
Teliaddoiiiinxjigoturafw , ,
Cadmium-:	
Chromium (Total).
Lead	
o-NHrean&ne-
Araenie	
Cadmium	
Mercury.....,
a E	^ M !¦ m m i
o-nmpnenoiM
Arsenic	
Cadmium	
Mercwy—
AnBne	
Benzene.
2,4-OMtrophenol-
Wtrotwnzene		
Aniline	
Benzene_
2,40nitrephenol.
Cyanides (TotaO—
CNorebenzene	
o-OctHorotMnzene-
7440-43-9
7440-47-32
7439-92-1
7440-38-2
7440-43-9
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7440-38-2
7440-43-9
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
62-53-3
71-43-2
51-28-5
98-95-3
108-95-2
62-53-3
71-43-2
51-284
98-95-3
108-95-2
57-12-5
71-43-2 .
108-90-7
95-50-1
'0.059
*0.068
'0.080
'0.054
'0.054
'032
1.9
0.32
0X37
•0.028
•0.014
•0X28
•0.028
•0.028
•0.028
•0.028
•0.008
•0.014
0.037
•0.54
•0.54
0.057
0.057
0X56
0.054
0X54
0.055
0.055
0.057
0X57
0.056
0.054
0.054
0.038
0.055
0.055
*0.057
'0.0033
*0.0012
'0.018
*0.0095
•1
•0.001
•0.001
•0.001
•0.001
•0.001
•0.001
1.8
0.32
0.51
• 0.27
0.79
0.24
0.17
0.082
•0.028
0.79
0.24
0.17
0.082
•4.5
•0.15
•0.61
•0.071
•	1.4
•	4.5
•0.15
•0.61
•0.073
•	1.4
'2.7
0.1'
O.OSi
0.08C
-------
22710 Federal Register / Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, Tune 1, 1900 / Rides and Regulations
Table CCW.—Constttusn.iiij - —¦-»-
wiCKai oyaoine	
Table CCWE In 268.41
Table CCWE In 26&41—
Mattel parathion.
tickel	:	
(Table)-
Cyaaides (Amenable).
rHWDonoBimiyvmne.
ParaWoa 	
Table 2 In 2B&42.
M-Nlbuaodliiwlliytamlne-
Phenytmercuy aoatate.
Table CCWE in 28841
and Table 2 in 288.42.
Famptitr-
Potassfcsa-eyanide-
Faanphur-
Cyanides (Total)-
Potassfcan steer cyanide _
Ethyl oyanide (Propsnenitrto).
Table CCWE in-26841—
(Amenable) _
Oyenidaa (Total).
Cyanides (Amenable).
Table CCWE to 28841	
			«» •+ »
cyamoe (nopaneraniei.
Selonton.
309-00-2
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
7440-38-2
57-12-6
57-12-8
88-8S-7
57-12-5
57-12-5
75-15-0
106-47-8
57-12-5
57-12-5
57-12-5
57-12-6
7440-38-2
90-57-1
7740-38-2
2S8-04-4
534-52-1
51-2B-5
939-88-8
33213-6-5
1031-07-6
72-20-8
7421-03-4
78-44-6
1024-57-3
485-73-6
57-12-6
57-12-5
7439-07-6
29S-00-0
7440-02-0
57-12-6
57-12-5
7440-02-0
100-01-6
62-75-9
56-36-2
7439-87-6
298-02-2
52-65-7
57-12-5
57-12-5
57-12-5
57-12-5
7440-22-4
107-12-0
7782-4S-2
*0.21
0.79
0.79
0.79
1.9
0.1
0.066
1.9
0.1
0.014
0.46
1.9
0.1
14
0.1
0.79
"0417
0.79
0.017
*0.28
*0.12
*0.023
"0.028
'0.029
*0.0028
*0.025
35
*0.0012
*0.016
*0.021
1.9
0.10
0.030
0.025
0.44
1.9
0.10
0.44
'0.028
'0.40
0.029
0.030
0.025
0.025
14
0.10
14
0.1
0.29
'0.24
*10
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1« 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22711
Table CCW.—CoNsrrruerr Concentrations in Wastes—Continued
coda
Commercial chanrical nanw
See otao
Regulated hanmtm« constituent
CAS N& far
(agisted
hazardous
constituent
Hon (mo/0
Pt04
WOO
PI 10
P1t3
P114
PltS
P119
PI 20
P121
PI 23
U002
U003
U004
UOOS
U009
U012
U018
U019
U022
U024
U02S-
U0Z7
U028
U029
U030
U031
U032
U038
1)037
U038
uon
U042
U043
U044
U045
U047
UM8
. U060
U0S1
U0S2
U057
U060
uoei
UOOS
UOOS
U007
U068
U069
U870
UD71
W72
UQ75
U078
U077
U078
U079
U080
U0S1
U002

TebleCCWEIn 268.41_
QfonUes (TotaQ-
Cffridti (AnMnsbts)^
Qau&M a——lJ.
oOTOB ijfBIBJB .
CiQBlJiiffeK-
TefcaaOiyl toad.
ThaOoodde
ThaBun
TlMfflumflJautfata^
Ammonia vuiisikti^
Vanadksni
Zne cyanide.
Table CCWE in 288.41
•nd TaHe 2 In 2KA2.
Table 2 in 268.42-	
Table CONE in 28041—
Table 2 In 28042	„
Table 2 tn 268.42	
Table 2 in 28042	

QWHIIw
VMm.
Cyanides (Totaft-
Acetone..
AoetonfMe.
Tabie2)n26042-
2-Acetytartnofluorene.
Aoytonfclle—_
SemManStrecena.
BeraoWpyrene-
BbCtaNoreattiyQeOMr.
Slag-oMoniaopnipyO ether.
Bbff-eSiyOwxyO ptMato.
fti ii ¦ ¦ ¦	ii /llnifc. A
uranonwiivNi iwwnyi unjtnuuy**
4-Bn*nophenyi phenyl ether	
n-Botyl ataohoi i
Calcium ohKNiiutu—
Cyanides (Amenable).
2-Aoetytajninoflue»ene ¦>
Benz(a)anthracene-
Benzo(a)pyrena-
Bat&cNoreeOiyQettwr-
0fl^vWPIMU|IQPf| vunr .
Blsg-ettiyOeiyO ptWate.
4., , «'¦		«
UeOf(m\Bpni 8nQ QBtrMW-
TabteOGWE in 86&41.
INUHMnRnW \M0u7l UUIIJBJh
48roHioplwflj^ piio^ ttfWiMHa
VnNRfl BCOlM n i	,,,
Omnium (TotaQ-
CNQfobnujlfitOMM
p-Qrtow-m-orasol-
2-CWoroettiyl vinyl.
Vlnyl J*jUu	
CMorotarm.
Table 2 in 288.42.
Tabto2fei26042.
CNoriane oi«Mm*>lu).
p.p'-OOe	
Ot)enzo(a^i)anmraoene_
1J20rowo-»c>iloropwpane ,
t^Oferamoethane (Ethylene dferenWe).
Dt-n-biityl ptuhalala.
nvOfcMonbenzene.
p-Ofclfcrcbeniana.
OMt-butyl pMhelate .
ntOcMorotoenzene-
vKMBomuamwumm*.
1.1-OicNoroethane_
4 AMakllMi^kAU
1 •^HABfmniOinaVW 
-------
22712
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1890 / Roles and Regulations
Table CCW.—Constituent Concentrations ih Wastes—Continued
ComwcU dwrtcafname.
See ^ao
ftoguteted haartom cmtWimil
CA8 No. tor
hazardous
oonsttuent
tion (mg/l)
U083
U084
U088
0093
U101-
0102
U109
uioe
U107
0108
0111,
0112
01*7
0118
U120 .
0121
0127
0128
0129
0130
0131
0134
0138
0137
0138
0140
0141
U142
0144-
U14S
0148 .
0161
0182
W15S
0157
0158
0159	.
0161
0162"
0168
0168
0169
0170
0172
0174
0179
0180
0181
0183
0185
0187
0188	-
0190'
0192 .
0196 '
0203
020+
U20S
0207
0208
U20»
0210
0211
0214
0215
0216
0217
0220
0225
0228
0227
IjtOcHowprepw-
l£OcNorapropam_
uHxnyi pnnu0«
Z+Obnethylp»wnol_
OknMiyl pMhatata^
2AOWtrotoluena _
2#OMrotohNm-
TaM>2ln26&42.
DMvoctyt pftthatata.
1,4-Oioxana.
1.2-OlcHorepropana..
d»l>OiehtareiMapiftara__
ttan»1,30eNi)iaprapytofw_
niaAkJ
Umyi piHMUIW
p-DliiiuaryUii-
Mercury-
»»¦*- - ¦ >» ¦
Mvranyvnuw.
Tabte CCWE in 26841 _
Table CCWE in 26&41_
Table CCWE In 26&41_
Table CCWE in 26841
and Table 2 In 288.42.
Kapona-
Lead.
Lead.
Mercury-
Mo Hi acrytanlMl
44' Mathytanobfa(2-cMoroarane>-
Metayl ethyl ketone.
Matti|4 iMbutyl ketone-
NWuiyi mraBijViiaai
A |JahaluMm m
«wnywno«innwna__-__.
4.4' UnlhytnnnWi(? chtaroanilnc)..
Rwuiyv «nyi munn«
78-83-1
120-68-1
143-60-8
7439-92-1
7439-92-1
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
128-98-7
91-80-6
56-49-6
Methyl isobutyl ketone.
Mettiy4 methacrylala	
101-14-4
78-93-3
108-10-1
80-62-6
2-ftaphthytamine—
Table 2 In 26842.
iH«BuMHHIU|fBnnBa
41 ||T^— ,, jinih I. _i_ ,
mtiuMouwuiyuunne	
frNtro-toUdbw.
5 Nltro o Mutfne.
PentacfttoronUrebenaene..
PaiilaUtoqbanwna-
PaniacWoronUrobemBiie-
91-20-3
91-69-8
98-96-3
100-02-7
924-16-3
55-18-5
100-75-4
930-55-2
AA M •
608-03-6
62-44-2
f— |, 				
niQHMif aflnyonov VMBBiM'ainnv
loadd).
nww aifiw pnurao V
toMhO- •
108-95-2
85-44-9
23950-68-5
Safcota-
ftnlaali	J*- » * -
CWWVUrI QwBOVU**Uai
8etankm Mtfdau
T,1 ,t>TatracMoreathana.
1.TA2-Tetiauhloioeltu»ia .
Table CCWE In 26Mt.
TaMaCCWEJn 2BBAU-
Satnfa-
Qrtflhiuro
SeMum-
< A i ¦
MitjylWIWWwWBWiw
1,1,1,2-TetracNoroeth8ne.
1.1A2>Tetrae«oroothane.
110-88-1
94-59-7
7782-49-2
7782-49-2
95-84-3
630-20-6
Cartww lalwiJtoUat-
Taflum(Daoaiat»	
ThaMunHOcartWMte-
*»--hi	nv	Ll—u- *
InBHUr^ifQiVOnOI.
Tha8um(l)nttfate_
Tahiana-
Table 2kn 28842-
Table 2 In 26842^
Tabta2 In 268.42.
TaWe 2in 28842-
ThaHun.
ThaSum.
Tr8iremQm8ttMna (Bronwtorrn)-
1.1.1-Triehtooethane	, ,
1.1.2-TricHoroe)hane—	,	
TMBum.
Totuena-
TribronMMhana (Bremotom).
1.1,1-Tricttormthane	
1|1|a.TilrJih»natha.M
79-34-6
127-18-4
96-23-6
7440-28-0
7440-28-0
7440-28-0
7440-28-0
108-88-3
75-25-2
7*45*6
79-00-6 ••
•085
*0038
*0038
'OS4
•ais
*0036
>054
• o»
>065
>054
»ai2
•a40
•034
»ai2
»ai4
•0XH8
*0.020
•0.055
*0.055
•0.00014
0X0014
0.023
aooi7
•0.057
*0X155
35
0.79
*00055
•0.10
5.8
0.081
0.0011
0.040
0.040
ao40
0.030
•0£4
0.081
*0.0055
•OS)
0£8
0.14
0.14
*0.059
•0.52
*0068
•0.12
•0.40
•0.40
*0.013
•0.013
•0.32
*0X155
*0.055
0.081
0.039
10J54
0.093
*0.014
0O81
10
lO
•0.055
0057
•0057
*0X156
*0.057
•0.14
•ai4
•aw
•0.14
*OX)80
•0.83
" *0054
— t(X0S4
-------
Federal Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22713
Ta£1£ CCW.—CONSTrTUQfT GONC&irRATIONS M WA8TES—Continued
OamnMNWchemU i
Sea also
RaguMad Marion corattuent
CAS No. tar
regulated
Hazardous
ten(mg/9
Bon 0054
OQ25
¦0l32
tt.72
*0.035
*029
>64
•0.10
>28
•10
28
• ais
1 TfMOnsm ttsnaarasiorvv ovDBMOconsQBioni wsfv MaDHSnoa. 0880a tpon MOMnoon n hm opwUBo w iwofoiHOt wct bw tocnracai
CFR ftt 284 Subpart Oar.flart 268 Subpart 0. or taaed upon cowbuaHoiKn teal aaMMirttonunBaapaiaingjw accordance appteaMa
tacj^jiiaycanayociifllaiicawtll»ttieaa>iialu>nntalandaidaacmrttoo>apwwMw»>»40CFR8ecboH2687.
*8sMd on analysts d ooanpoato saiiiilaB,
' A« analygad using SW-846 MaffodfotO; sampte giza: OJ-TO; (Jhi88a0on ttmo: one hour to ona tar fifteen minutaa.
NA—Not AppReaMa.
wqufcaments ot 40
" raquframanta. A
(c) Notwithstanding the prohibitions
specified in paragraph (a) of this section,
treatment and disposal fariHtfcwjnay
demonstrate (and certify pursuant to
8 28&7(b}(5]} compliance with the
treatment standards for organic -
constituents specified in this section
provided the following conditions are
satlsifiedi
' (1) The treatment for the organic
constituents were established based on
incineration in units operated in -
accordance with the technical
requirements of 40 CFR part 264. subpart
O or 40 CFR part 265, subpart O, or
based oa combustion in fuel substitution
units operating in accordance with
applicable technical requirements;
(2)	The organic constituents have been
treated using the methods referenced In
paragraph (c)(1) of this section and
(3)	Tub treatment or disposal facility
has been unable to detect the organic
constituents despite using its best good*
faith efforts as defined by applicable
Agency guidance or standards. Until
sudi guidance or standards are
developed, such good-faith efforts may
be demonstrated where the treatment or
disposal facility has detected the
organic constituents at levels within an
order of magnitude of the treatment
standard specified in this section.
13. Appendix IV is added to part 268
to read as follows:
Appendix IV—OxganometalHc Lab
Packs
Hazardous waste with the following
EPA waste codes may be placed in an
"organometallic" or'lAppendix IV lab
patefe"
POOt P002, POOS, P004, P005, POOa P007,
P008, P0O9.-PO13, POM, POM, POM,
P017. PQ18, P020, P022. P023.P024,
P025, P026, P027, POZB, P03t P034,
,P036> P037, POSd. P039. P040, P04t
' P042, P043, POM, PQ45, P047, P048,
P048, POHO, P05t P054, P058, P057,
P058, P0S9, Poea P062, P063, P064,
P065, P068, P067, P068L P069, P070,
P07tP072.P073.P074.P07S.P077,
P081.P082,P084P08BbP087.P088.
P089, P092.P093, P094. P09S. POBft
P097, P098, POOS, P101. P102. P103,
P104, PI05, P108, PI09, Plia P112,
Pitt. P114, P115, P118, Pitt, P119.
P120.P122.P123
U001, U002, U003, U004, U005, U008,
U007, U008, U009. U010, UOlt U012.
U014, U015i UQtt. U017, U018, U019.
U02aU021.U022.U023.U024.U025,
U026. U027, U028, U02a U030, U031,
U032. U033, U034, U035, U038, U037.
U038.U038.U04tU042.U043.U044.
U045, U048, U047. U048. U049. U050.
U05t U052. U053, U055. U056, U057.
uosB. uosa uooa uoei, uoez uoes.
U064, U066, U067, U068, U069. U070,
U07t U072.U073. U074, U075, UQ76,
U077, U078, U079, U08a U081, U082.
U083, U084, U08S, U088, U087. U088,
U089, U09a U09t U092, U003. U094.
U095, U096. U097. U098. U099, UlOt
U102. U103, U105. U106, U107, U108,
U10S, una Ullt Ull2. UU3, UU4.
U115. Ullfl, UU7, U118, UU9, Ul2a
Ul2t U122, U123, U124, U125, U126,
U127. U128, U129, Ul3a U131, U132.
U133. U134. U135, U136, U137, U136,
U137. U138, U139. Ul4a Ul4t U142.
U143. U144, U145, U146. U147, U148.
U149, U150, U152, U154. U153, U154,
U155, U156, U157, U158, U159, U160,
UlBt U162, U164. U165. U168, U167.
U168 Urn U170, U171, U172, U173.
U174. U176, U177. U178, U179, UlBO,
UlBt U182, U183, U1B4. U185. U188
U187. U18a U189, U19a UlOt U192.
U193, U194, U198, U197, U200. U201,
U202, U203, U204, U205, U206, U207,
U20& U20a U210, U21t U213, U214.
U219, U218, U217, U218, U219, U220,
U22t U222, U223, U22S. U22a U227.
U228. U234, U235. U238, U237, U23&
U23a U24a U243; U244. U248, U247.
U248.U24aU328.U3S3.U359
POOt P002.F003. FD04. P005, F006. FOia
F020, F021, F023, F024, F028, F027,
P028
KOOt K002, Kooa Kiooa KOia KOlt
KOI 3. KOI 4, KOI 5, K016, K017, K018,
KDiaK02aK02tK022.K023.K024.
KD25.K02aK027.K028.K029.K03a
K03tK032.K033.K034.K035.K038,
. K037. K038, K03a K040, K04t K042,
K043, K044, K04S, K046, K047, K048,
K04a K05tt KOSt K052, K054, K06a
K06tK064.K065.K06aK069.K07t
K073, K083, K084. K08S, K088, K087,
K093.K094.K09S.K09aK097.K098,
K099, K101, K102, K103, K104, K105,
Kill, K112, K113, K114. K115, K113,
K117, Klia K123, K124, K125, K12&
K136
TOO!. 0002, D003. D004, DOOS, D006,
D007, Dooa DOia DOlt D01& D013.
0014. ooiaroia 0017
U032, Ul3a U144. U145. U148, U183,
U214, U215, U2ia U217
14. Appendix V is added to part 268 to
read as follows:
Appendix V—Organic Lab Packs
Hazardous wastes with the following
EPA Hazardous Waste Code No. may be
placed in an "organic" or "Appendix V:"
POOt P002, P003. P004. P005, POOa P007.
pooa Pooa P013, P014, pois, poia
P017, POia P02a P022. P023, P025,
P024, P02B, P027, P028, P031, P034,
P038, P037. P038, P039, P04a P041,
P042, P043, P044, P045, P046, P047,
P04a P04a P05a P051, P054, P057,
P058, Pisa P06a P062, P063, P064,
P064, P065, P08a P087, P068, P089,
P07a P071, P072, P073, P074, P075,
P077.P08tP082.P084.P085.P087,
P08aP08aP092.P093.P094.P095,
P098, P097, P098, P099, PlOl, P102,
Pi03, Pi04, Pi05, Pioa Pi09, Plia
put P112. P113, P114, P115, Piia
pna Piia Pi2a P122, P123
uoot U002. Uooa U004. U005, uooa
. uoo7, uooa uooa uoia uoit U012.
U014, uois, uoia U017. uoia uoia
U02a U02t U022, U023, U024, U025,
U02a U027, U028, U029, U03a U031.
U033.U034, U035, U038, U037. U03a
-------
32714 Fe 1 Register / VoL 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
U039, U04t U042. U043. U044, U045,
U048, U047, U048, U049. U050. UOSt
U052. U053. U055, U0S6, U057.XJ0S8.
U0S9, U060, U081, U062, U063, U084,
U08* U067. U068, U069, U070, U07t
U072, U073, U074, U075. U078,11077,
U078iU07B.U0aaU081.U082.OQ83.
U084, U085. U088, U087. U088, U088,
U090, U091. U092, U093» U094. U095,
U096. U097, U098. U099. UlOt U102.
U103, U105.U106, U107. U108pUl09,
urn urn. U112. U113, UU4, uiis,
una, uii7, una una um ura,
U122, U123, U124, U12$ U128, U127,
urn um uisa urn ui32.um
U135.U137, U138, U139, Ul40,Ul4t
U142^U143*U147, U140, U149. UlSa
um U154, U155. U158, U157, U158,
uisa uiaamet maz, uies. ui&t.
mes. Uiea: Uio^ui68 uisa mm
Um.U172.U173, U174, U178, U177,
U178. U179, Ul8aUl81,Ul82, Ujl83,
U184, U18& U188 U187, U188, U189, .
Ul9a UlBtUlOZ, Ul9£ U194. U196, '
U197.U200.U201. U202. U203, U20S,
U206, U2Q7..U208, U209, U2ia UZ11*
U213, U214, U218. U218. U220, U22t
U222, U223. U22S, U22B, U227, U228,
U234.U235, U238, U237, U238, U239,
U240, U243, U244, U248.U247.U248.
U24a U328. U353, U359
F001.F002.F003. F004, F005, FOia F020,
F02tF023.F024.F02aF027.F028
KOOt kooa KOiaKOlt K013, K014.
- KOIS, KOI8. K017, K018, K019, K02a
K02J.K022.K023.K024.K025.K02a
KQ27.K02aK0SaK031.K032.Kb33.
K034, K03a K03a K037. K038, K03a
K04aK04tKQ42.K04aK044.K045.
, K048, K047, K048, K049, K05a K05t
K052.K0S4.K06a K085, K073. K083,
K084. K085, K08a K087, KD93, K094,
, K09& K09a K097, K09a K099, KlOt
V K102. K103, K104, KlOa Kilt K112.
: K113, K114, K115. K118, K117, K11&
! K123.K124, K12S, Kl2a K138
bbOt 0012. D013, D014.D015.D018,
D017,.
. 15. Appendix VI isadded to part28a
taread asiallows;
'i" i	•—
AppwHlh VI—gnmTnintmrfnd
Tedmologes to Achieve Deactivation of
Characteristics in Section 28&£Z
The treatment standard for many
subcategories of D001, D002. and D003
wastes as well as for K044.K045, and
K047 wastes is listed in 288.42 simply as
"Deactivation to remove the
characteristics of ignitability.
coirosivity, and reactivity". EPA has
determined that many technologies,
when used alone or in combination, can
achieve this standard. The following
appendix presents a partial list of these
technologies, utilizing the five letter .
technology codes established in 40 CFR
28042Table t Use of these specific
technologies is not mandatory and does
not preclude direct reuse, recovery, and /
or the use of other pre treatment
technologies provided deactivation is
achieved and these alternative methods
are not performed in units designated as
land disposaL
¦WM^oode/subcateuoiy
NoimrtwwtOT
Wastewaters
0001 tgnttabte Uquida basedon 281.2T{aXt) Low TOG HciiwKiUwwlot SubcalBpory (oontaining 1% to <10%
- TOQ. -	• •" r- "¦ i - •••'.• - .• -r ••• •• •
0001 Iflrttgbte Uquld« bindon^ftlJ1(a)<1) iQitoblo WagtBtKatBrSubcatBgoty (cuiuali*H) <1%-TOC)-:	
R0RG3-
INCtN.
WETOX_
CHOXO-
8(OOQ.
iva.
OOOf Qmprasstd Gases based an 261^1 (A)CT ¦	vf "" ¦
i I*
RCGAS.

OQtt jgntafcto naac»wi based On 2SlJ1(aX2) _
• .-i-
INCtN.
FSUBS.
AOQAS flx INCtN				
AOQAS ft. (CHOXD; Of CHRED).
WTRRX	:	
CHOXD-	;		

CHRED.
STABl—
0001 tgnSabieOxkSzns based on 261^1 (aX4>.
mciN-
CHRS5.
0002 Add Subcategory based on 2St22(aMU pH'tos® than or equal lb 2-
0002AkaSne Si tfyatfBgoiy basedon 2B1-^2(a)n).i»ah pHgwateif than cr equal to12A.
0002OtherConosbe*baaeden2ei«(a)<2) r"
mem.
RCORR-
NEUTR-
ucm_
NEirm_
INCW_
CHOXD-
OOOSWaterReacttasbasedon28l^3(a)(2^Pkand<4)~—,,^ '			
•	' - :• • '•.•••;	'.-X: "¦ :
0603 nosctl»>Sulgdes based on 261 ^3.
mcm_
STABl—
mem.
CHOXD.
CHRED.
. D003 Other Reacttoes based on
mcrn.
CHQXD-
CHRED.
RORGS
mem
WETOX
CHOXD.
BK30Q
aa.
na.
CHRED
mem
NEUTR
incin
NEUTR
INCm
CHOXD
CHRED
INCIN
HA ¦
CHOXD
CHRED
BIOOQ
INCIN
INCIN
CHOXD
CHRED
BIOOQ
CARBN
INCtN
CHOXD
CHRS)
BtOOQ
CARBN
-------
• /. c.*	r '• t r-Ml	\ i-r !! !¦)"/ \ I i	'
Federal Register /.Vol. 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations
22715
Ufa		J- *	«-	»		
Wwl GOQwSUDCBIBQOnr
NM4 WBSGBWOBr nOIMnl BUQJOB iiwmi TO (nWUFWUnnQ 8RO pnX688nQ Of 8PmMS«
CHOXD.
CHRED.
INCIN	
CHOXD
CHRED
8JOOG
KIMS Spanl carton (ram ttw treatment of msimnm containing AflMiMS-
CHOXD.
CHRED _
MPN.
CARBN
INCIN
CHOXD
CHRED
BIOOG
K047 PHi/rad water from TNT operations.
CHOXD.
CHRED -
mem.
CARBN
INCIN
CHOXD
CHRED
BIOOQ
CARBN
INCIN
Nola: "ita." atanda to "not applicable"; "lb." atanda tor "Mowed by".
16. Appendix VII is added to part 268.
to read as follows:
Appendix Vll.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDfls'
tCMnprahanilwaUat]
Waste coda
Wasta category
EraGOM an
OaBomtaBst-
liquid
hazardous
i	«- -*•	*
rouowg mv
gqulda ,
. atttaoSdor
'. Hudga, -¦
' oontaWng -
baa cyanides
¦«L .•
- oonoantnh
July a 1887.
-
than or equal
to 1.000 mg/l
or certain "
- me&a or
compounda of
- these metals
greater thaw
or equal to
m ptmnureon
-
wURVni at*.
towlSL
Uouid f—
July a 1987.
CaffomtaBst-.
waataa having-
apHlaas .
than or equal
to 2.
OaoHQC
. (Mnedaa
'July a 1987.

nttumtM


. ffiar contain
>•
Caflferrtatst-.
or aoual to
1,000 mg/l
- but laaa than
10000 mg/l
Liquid
harardoui
opntaMng >
PCSsflraatar-
tfMft Of equal
. toSOppm.
July a 1987.
Appendix VII.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDRs •—Continued
(Comprehensive Ust] -
Wilts oodi
wane fjiwgory
Effective date
Gritomte bt-.
Other Iquid and
ravaqrid
harardoue
oontaMng
HOCshtoM
Nov. a 198a
Gafitamta
greater than
¦ or equal to
1,000 mg.
Soa and debris
HOCsnot
(ram
CERCLA/
RCRA
oonecflve
Juiya 1989.
MULmU — *
lancnaa ibIm
SolanddeMs
HOCsbom
CBWXA/
RCRA
corrective
Nov. 8,1990.
0001
acDona.
M

(MM
ah
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
nrmj	
AB
0004	
Inorganic aofld
iWata.
0004	
000S_		
Inofpirtc sold
' iMb.
UayS. 1992.
Aug. a 199a
May a 1992.
0006	
0006	
ABothart
(norgwie told
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
mm
VBBUIHk
Alalia
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
nm» ¦
InvQHio sold
ihMt

0007	
AiOtfWffl
Inoganto
(Mrlai
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992. -
0006	
Lead add
Maya.1992.
ntw
M 	
Aug. a 199a
May a 1992.
0009	
Inorganic aofld
0009-—.	
Mgti mercury
non-
Maya 1992.

low mercunr
non-
Maya 1992.

Alothara
Aug. a 199a
Appendix VII.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDRs *—Continued
[Comprehensive Usd
Waste code ¦ Waste category
0010	
001	0	
001	1	
001	1	
001	2	
001	3	
0001	4	
0001	5	
0001	6	
0001	7	
FOOI-FOOS.
F001-F006.
F009-
F010-
F010-
F011-
F012-
F019-
FOSd-
P020.
F0Z1-
Inorganie tofid
Inorganic solid
ABothera-
Al	
Al-
Afl_
AS.
AH.
AS, (
Small quantity
CERCLA/
RCRA
initial
mixtures,
aoiMn^
containing
sludges and
CStCLA/
RCRA
Al.
	«
«no aeons*
AB<
AI_
Al_
Sol and debris.
Ald#w»s___
Sol and debris-J
Effective data
May 8.1992.
Aug. a, 1990.
May 8.1992.
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. 8.1990.
Aug. 8.1990.
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. 8.1990.
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. 8,1990.
Nov. 8,198&
Nov. a 1988.
Nov. 8,1990.
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. a 198&
July a 1989.
July a 1989.
July a 198a
July a 198a
Junes, 1991.
June a 1989.
July a 198a
July a 1989.
Aug. a 199a
Nov. a 1990.
Nov. a 1988.-
Nov. a 1990.
-------
22720
Federal Register / Vol 55» No. 109 f Friday, Jtmel, 1990 / Rules and Regulati s
Appbkm VII.—Effecttvb~ Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed l» THE LDRs ^-Continued
[CowyNMlw ml
Watt* 80di
F021
turans).
FQ24	
Afloflwra——
CAM
AO
EMM
fM wttffhhrta
nwfl '
mv
Set and debris—
F0Z7	

F028	
Sofl and debris—
BIM
fig
**88'	
CM

ROOT
Sot and debris—
K0011
«gi
KOOI.
KOOZ.
K003_
K0O4.
KOOS'-
Kooe.
K007*.
K008—
K023-
K02C-
KQ2S*
K028-
AB_

A»_
Afl_
AB_
Aft.
Aft_
Sofl and debria.
Sol anddabria—
AUottwa	
SaB andttebris.
ML.
SatantfdBMi.
SaB and t
Sat and debris.
Aft.
AB_
Soft and debris.
QwRVQUIVi
Se» and debria—
Nov. 8,196ft
Nov. A1890.
Nov. 811988,
Nov. 8,1800.
NOV. 8.1888.
June ft. 1991.
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8.1990.
June 8,1989.
Aug. 8,1990.
Nov. 811900.
Nov. 8119881
Nor. Skim
Nov. ft 1988:
Nov. 8.1990.
Nov. 8^ 1888.
Au» ft 199ft
May. 8^1892.
Aug. 8; 199ft
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. 8.1988.
Aug. ft	
Aug. 8,1980.
Aug. 8,199a
Aug.ft1990i
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. 8; 199a
Au» 811998.
JbnaS, 1991.
Junaftt98ft
JmeS, 1991.
JfeneftlMft
Au» ft 18601
ft 18891
ft 1891.
Aug. ft 1990..
Juaeft 18881
Jim ft 1991.
Aug. ft 1990.
ft 198ft
8,1991.
_ 8,188ft
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 188ft
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1988.
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. ft 198ft
Aug. ft 198a
Aug. 8.1888.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft. 1900.
Aug. ft 1988.
Aug." ft 1990L
Jtamfttttt.
Juno ft 198ft
Aug:ftt99a
Aug. ft 198ft.
Aug.ft 199ft
Au* ft 199ft.
Jwieft 199T.
JWWft 198ft
Jlmftfflftf.
Aug ft 198ft
Juneft 1
Aogft 199a
Juneft 198*
Juneft WW.
As® ft 19801
Appendix ' V1L—Effective Dates or
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
or mthe LDRS *—Gonfinaed
CCompreherafce UsU
Afpcxmx Vll.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed M THE LEtftS*—Continued
CComprBhansivB List]
• code
K106-
i category Effective data
High mercury
non-
Lom mercury ,
non-
May 8.1992.
Kay. ft 1992.
SoB and debris -
ABothem 	
Sol and debris.
AS others	
Aug. ft 199ft
June ft 1991.
Juneft 1989.
June ft 1991.
>8,1989.
Juneft 1991.
June ft 1989.
Jbneft 1991.
I ft 198ft
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft. 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. 8.199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
j. ft 1990.
NomwBlawatef J May ft 1992.
Aug. 8.1990.
May ft 1992.
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992.
Aug. ft 1990.
Afl-
Afl_
AH_
ao_
Waatowalnr ...
Namraetawater.
AO	
Waalawntnr
Nonwastawatar.
Sot and debris-
0«Ji	»
sod etna aeons.
SaB and debris.
Sofl and debria.
A8 others	
Sot and debris.
Al_
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
June ft 1989.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. 8,1990.
»ft 1989.
J 8,1989.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1992.
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1992.
Juna ft 1891.
June ft 1989.
) ft 1991.
June ft 1989.
Juieft 1991.
June ft 1989.
Aug. ft 1990.
June ft 1991.
June ft 1989.
JmeS. 1S91.
June ft 1989.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. 8,1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55. No. 106 / Friday, June 1. 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22717
Appendix VII.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed In the LDR8 «—Continued
f Comprehensive List]
Warts ood8 VtadBCStagvy EffsdhB data
P069.
P0S0-
AB_
POOS.
P0S6-
i mercury
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. & 199a
JunaS, 1991.
Jaw a 198a
Junes, 198a
Aug. 8,199a
May 8.1992.
Lowmmiy May 8.1992.
Al.
Al.
AB-
Sol and debris—
AB others i
Afl_
AB_
Al-
so* and deMa.
Wgh marcury
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8.199a
June 811991.
JuneS, 1988..
Aug. 81199a
Aug. a 199a
June 811988.
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8.189a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 81199a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8,199a
June 8,1991.
June 8.188a
May 811892.
Aug. 8.199a
June a 1891.
JuneS, 1888.
May 8,1992.
P092-
Loarmarauy May 8.1992.
Sol and debris.
AB othera—.
P098-
P098-
P099(s9ver)_
P099
(cyanides).
P099
(eyartdea/
Solanddebrfe.
AB othera
So* nd debris.
AB others—
AB.
sol ana 000ns.
ABi
Al.
Aug. 8.199a
MayS, 1882.
Aug. 8.189a
June 8,1991.
JunaS, 198a
May 8,1992.
Aug. 8,189a
Aug. * 199a
June 8.1991.
June8,1981
June 8,198a
Aug. 8,199a
JuneS, 198a
Jim a 198a
PI 01.
P102_
P103-
P104(s#»ar)_
P104 -
(cyanides).
PI 04
(cyanides/
P109-
P109.
Aug.8,199a
Aug. 8,189a
Aug. 8.198a
Aug. & 199a
JuneS. 1989.
r- June 8.1989.
AB.
Al-
so! and deMs-
Al others	
	*
ono ooon»~
AB<
Aug. a 199a
June 8.1989.
Maya 1992.
Aug. 8.1990.
June 8.199%
JuneS, 1989.
Appendix VIL—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in THE LDRS Continued
[Cotnpmheimv UsO
	^ —	>*l- _ A 		A		
WBUB OOOB W8SSB CMBQOqf
U003.
U003.
U004.
uoos.
U008.
UOOS.
U007-
U007.
UOOS.
U009.
U010.
U010-
U011.
U011.
U012-
U014.
U014.
U01S.
U01S.
U018.
U017.
U017.
U018.
U018.
UQ20.
U020-
U021.
U021.
U022.
U023.
AB-
Al.
AL
AL.
8ol and debris.
AO others—
Sol and debris.
All
Al_
AB-
AO-
AO.
Al.
AB-
A0-
Sol and debris -
Al i
Al.
AB-
8o« and debris.
Al othere.
Sol and debris.
AB othera
AO	
AO-
Sol and dabrfa.
AO others	
Sol and debris-
All
Sol and deMa
Al others	
Sol and debris
AB
Al.
QjJ|	-» -J-L. -j-
901 flnO OBDnl-
AB othera-—
Al	
AI-
Sol and debris.
Al others-
	« jUula
On OBDR8*
AO others-
AO	
AB.
Eltecttue date
Aug. 8.199a
June 8.1991.
Jim a 198a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,189a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8,199a
MayS, 1892.
Aug. 8,199a
May S, 1992.
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8,188a
June 8,198a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8.199tt
May 8,1992.
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. 8.199a
Mays, 1992.
Aug. SL 199a
May a 1992.
Aug. 8,199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. 8k 189a
May 8,1992.
Aug. a 199a
May 8,1892.
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. 8k 189a
May 8,1992.
Aug. 8,199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. 8,199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
May a 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug.ai99a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
jwa'i99i.
June a 198a
Aug. a 189a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. 8,189a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Appendix VII.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDRs •—Continued
[Comprehensive UsO
waste cooe waste category
U044.
U045.
U047-
U049-
U049-
UOSO.
U0S1.
U0S2.
UOSS.
U055.
U058.
U0S7.
U058-
UOSS.
UOSS.
U059.
U060-
U060.
U081.
U081.
U062.
U082.
U083.
U064.
UOSS.
U087.
U068.
U069.
U069.
U070.
U071.
U072.
U073.
U073.
U074.
U074.
U075-
U078.
U077.
U078.
U079.
U080.
U081.
U082.
U083.
U084.
UOSS.
U088.
U087.
U087.
U088-
U088-
U089.
U090.
U097.
U097-
U098.
U099.
U101.
U102.
U102.
U1Q3-
AB.
Afl.
Sol and dabrfa.
Al others	
AH	
Al.
901 ana osons-
All
AB.
Al.
AB.
Al.
Al.
AO.
AB_
Sol and debris.
AB othera	
Sol and debris.
Al othera-
son ano onra.
AB othera	
Sol and debris .
Al othera—_
Sol and dabria.
Al <
Al.
Al-
AB-
Al.
W-B	'
908 ana 000ns..
AS others
Al	
AO-
AO-
Sol and debris _
Al others—
Sol and dabria
Al
AB.
AB.
AB.
AB-
AB_
AB.
AB.
AB.
AB.
AO.
Afl„
AO.
SoB and dabria.
AB othera-
900 ana 000ns.
AB i
AB.
AB.
Sol and Debris—
AB othera	
so0 ana 000ns.
ABotfwra.
aos ana oBons.
Al others.
Al.
J J-i—¦ —
son ano deona.
All
Al.
Sol and dabria.
All
Al.
Al.
Al.
Effective date
Aug. 8,1
Aug. a 199a
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 1 L
Aug. a 199a
May a 1992.
Aug. 81199a
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
June a 1992.
June a 1
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
May a 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 199a
May a 1992.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a1
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 199a
June a 1991.
June a 1989.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1880.
Aug. a 1890.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 199a
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 199a
JuneS, 1991.
June a 1
June a 1991
June a 1969.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Maya 1992.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
Aug. a 1990.
.June a 1991
June a 1
Aug. a 1990.
-------
22718 Federal Register / Vol 55, No. 106 I Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Appendix VII.—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDRs »—Continued
UsO
Wuls code WlWCSllQOf^ ClfUUfce Jalfr
U10S-
U108-
U107.
U107-
U108.
U108-
U110-
U110-
U11t.
Ill 12-
U113-
U114-
U114.
U11S.
U116.
U11S.
U117.
in 18.
una.
U119.
U12Q-
U121.
U122.
U123-
U124.
U12S.
U12S.
U127.
U1Z8-
U12S.
U130-
U130.
U131.
U132.
U132-
U133.
U134.
U13S.
U138.
U136.
U137.
U138-
U140U1.
U141.
U142.
U143.
U143-
-U144.
U14S.
U146.
U147.
U148-
U14S.
U148.
in 49.
U1S0.
U150-
uist.
U161.
U151-
U1ST.
U182.
1/153.
So* and debris.
AlMMnL.—
Al.
So* and debris.
Al<
A».
Al.
Al.
Sol and debris.
Sol end debris.
A*_
Aa.
Snl and dews.
All
AM.
Sol and debris.
All
Al-
Al.
M-
SoB and debris
Afl others	
Afl	
AO.
AO.
Sol and debris.
AD others——
Soi and debris.
AO others	
Soil and debris.
High nwcu)
Lowmerouy
non-
Sot and debris.
SoisnddBbris-J
Aug. St 1980.
Aug. & 199a
Jte»ft1961.
JuneB, 196ft.
Aug. ft1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1960.
Aug. ft 1990.
Au» ft 199a
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1982.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
May ft 1992.
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. 8.199a
Aug. ft 189ft
May 8.1992.
Aug. ft 199ft
Au(^ ft 18801
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199a
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 1890.
Aug. ft 1890.
Aug. 8.199ft
Aug. 8,1990.
May ft 1892.
Aug. ft 1890.
Aug. ft 1990.
May 8.1992.
Aug. ft 189ft
Aug. ft 188ft
Aug. ft 188ft
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 188ft
May ft 1892.
*0.8,1980.
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug-ft 189ft
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 1880.
May ft 1882.
'/tog. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 1890.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1892.
Aug. ft 1890.
May ft 1882.
Aug. ft-188ft
May ft 1882.
Aug. ft 1880.
May ft 1992.
May ft 1992.
May ft 1992.
Aug.ft1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992:
Appcnow VII—Effective Dates of
Surface Disposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LDfls«—Continued
CCbmpreftenefc« UeO
Wnb oode Waste category
U153-
U1S4.
DISS.
U1S6-
U156-
U157.
U1S8.
U159.
U160-
U161-
U162-
U163-
U163-
U164.
U164.
U1BS-
U168.
U187_
U167.
U168.
U160.
U169.
U183.
U184.
U184.
uiea.
U186.
U187.
-U188.
U188.
U183.
U193.
U194.
U194.
U196.
Al otim.
Al	
Al.
Sot and debris.
Alt
Al.
Al.
Al.
Al.
Al.
ML
Al.
Soa and debris.
Al others	,
Sol and debris.
AB others —I-
AB	
Sol and debris.
AA others——
Al	
Al.
Afl.
AO.
Sol and debris.
ad <
Sol and debris.
Sol and debris.
AD others*—
Sol and debris.
AO others	
Aft.
Aug ft 188ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992.
Aug. ft 198ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug ft 199ft
Aug. ft 199ft
Aug.8,1990.
Mayft 1992.
Aug.-ft 199ft'
Mayft 1992.
Aug. ft 1980.
Aug. 8.1990.
Aug. ft 1980.
May ft 1992.
Aug. ft 1980.
May ft 1982.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
May 8.1892.
Aug. 8.1990.
Aug.ft1990.
May 8.1892.
Aug. ft 1880l
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1992.
Aug ft 199ft
May 8.1882.
Aug ft 1980.
Mayft 1892.
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. 8,1880.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug ft 1990.
Aug. ft 199ft
Mayft 1992.
Aug.8,1990.
Aug. ft 1990l
Aug ft 1990.
Aug ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1880.
Aug. ft 1880.
June ft 1881.
Juraft 1888.
Mayft 1882.
Aug.8,1990.
Aug ft 1990l
May ft 1992.
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992.
Aug.8,1990.
Aug.8,1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
May ft 1992.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992.
Aug. ft T990l
Aug.ftT990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Aug. ft 1990.
Mayft 1992.
Appendix VIL—Effective Dates of
Surface Deposed Wastes Regulat-
ed in the LORs*—Continued
CComprohonat— List)
Warts code Waste category
U206-
U207.
U208.
U209.
U210,
U211.
U213.
U214.
U215.
U218.
U217.
U218.
U218.
U219.
U219.
U220.
U234.
U234.
U238.
U235.
U238.
U238-
U237-
U237.
U238-
U238.
U23».
U240.
U240.
U243.
U244.
U244.
U248.
U247.
U248.
U248.
AB (
Al.
AO.
AB.
Aft.
Al_
Al.
Afl.
All.
Aft.
Sol and debris.
AB others	
Sol and debris.
AO)
AO.
Sol and debris.
SoO and debris-
AO others	
SoBsnd debris-
AO others	
Sol and debris.
Al others	
-Soland debris.
Afl (
Al.
p-f	»
909 sno aeons-
Afl(
AO-
Sol and debris.
Afl others	
AO	
AO.
AD-
AS.
Effect!* date
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
Aug.ft
Aug. ft
Aug. 8,
Aug. ft
Aug ft
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
Aug ft
Aug 8,
Mayft
Aug ft
Mayft
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
Juneft
June ft
Mayft
Aug. ft
Juneft
Juneft
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
Aug. 8,
Mayft
Aug 8,
June 8,
Juneft
Mayft
Aug. ft
May ft
Aug. ft
Mayft
Aug. B,
Aug. ft
Mayft
Aug ft
Aug. ft
Mayft
Aug ft
Aug. ft
Aug. 8,
Aug. ft
Aug. ft
188ft
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990.
1990l
1992.
1990.
1992.
1990.
1990.
1991.
1992.
1990.
1991.
1989.
1990.
1990.
19901
1990.
1992.
1990.
1991.
19891
1992.
1990.
1992.
1990.
1992.
1990.
199a
1992.
1990.
1990.
1992.
1990.
199ft
1990.
199ft
199ft
°THs table does not Include mixed radtoacBvc
wastes (from the First, Second, and Third Third
rutss) wMch are receiving a national capacity vari-
ance until May ft 1892 for al applicable treatment
ate being
loroetftane and 2-ntropnipane
for 1.1.2-trich.
wastewaters and
Standards are being promulgated for benzene
and MhoayeOanol lor wastewaters and non-
•Treatment standards for nonwastewaters de-
posed of aflec June ft 188ft-were promulgated June
8,1989.
•Treatment standards for nonwastewaters 
-------
Federal Register / Vol 55, No. 106 / Friday, lone 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations	22719
Appendix vill—National Qapabty LDR Variances for UIC Wastes ¦ Comprehensive Ust—Continued
Waste oodB
Waste category
Effect** date
^ - w* ¦ ^ *
CBUORm hl
CBOOffll RL
^ - ¦*- — « -
CMWnll 9SLm
0009.
F011.
F039-
K009.
K011	
K011	
K013	
K013	
KD14	
K016 (ifiuts)
K048	
K048	
K090-
K0S1-
K0S2-
K062.
KD71.
K104.
0003 (cyanides}
0003 fsuOdee)..
0003(i
0007.
0009.
¦ « it	*	» « * - 		 « «- ¦»
V10UBV1Q SH BBKSOS 8B9OG1B0Q nwi
any eoBd or rtrign oontaMng free cyanldee at comwnlia-
flans greater than or equal to 1.000 mg/l or containing
-certain metals or compounds of theM metals greater than or
equal to ino proraoon wm»
Liquid hazardous waits hairing a pH lass than or equal to 2	
WMWOUI Mn UHIBIIWJ nuj II on uwwwmmb ra
than 10400 mg/l but greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/L
All	:	
Al.
AS.
AS.
AS.
nign Mercury wonwiMUmMOf,
Low Morcuy NonMStoMMr.
¦ If- . A ¦ r *	
W88WWV.
AO	
AS.
AD-
AH.
AS.
AO.
AS.
AS.
AS.
AS.
Augusts, 1990.
August 8.1990.
Augusts, 1990.
Mays, 1992.
May 8,1992.
May 8,1992.
MayS, 1992.
MayS, 1992.
May 8,1992.
May 8.1992.
June 8,1991.
MayS, 1992.
Juna 8,1991.
June 8,1991.
MayS, 1992.
June 8,1991.
May 8.1992.
MayS, 1992.
June 8,1991.
August 8,199a
August 8,199&
August 8,199a
Augusts, 199a
August 8.199a
August 8.199a
Augusts, 199a
Augusts, 199a
¦Wastes that are deep wed disposed on-site receive a six-month variance, «Mh reatrtcttona affective in Nwomber 199a
kOwpw8Sin)ectedO502liquld8Mth a pH less than 2 must meet the CaWOmia Ust teatment standards on August 8,199a
^" - «L|. » «- »- L»	¦ ' - ' * - A I - 		«		 * 1^.	«
none tw QD6 m prowno tor mo conversance or *no reeoer.
PART 270—CPA ADMINISTERED
PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE
HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
PROGRAM
1.	The authority citation for part 270
continues to read as follows:
' Authority? 42 U&C. 6905,6912,6824,-6825,
6927,693a and 6974.
Subpart D—Changes to Pennit
2.	Section 27042, appendix I is
amended by redesignating item B(l)(b)
as B(l)(c), and adding item B(l)(b) as
follows:
S27042 Permit modification at the
request or in* permniM.
Appendix I to Section 270.42—
Classification of Permit Modification
& General FacWy Standards
i:
b> To Incorporate ohsngos i
ed with ROT (muM^urce teach-
er) sampbng or analysis methods*.
PART 271—REQUIREMENTS FOR
AUTHORIZATION OP STATE
HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAMS
1. Tits authority citation for part 271
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905,6912(a), and S92&
Subpart A-Requirements for Final
Authorization
2. Section 271.1(f) is amended by
adding the fallowing entry to Table 1 in
chronological order by date of
publication in the Federal Register
9271.1 Purpose and scope.
0) * * '
Table 1.—Regulations Implementing the Hazardous and Souo Waste Amendments of 1984
nunUyttlMi uolv
TUe of regulation
Federal Register reference
Effective date
June 1,1990.
Land Disposal neaMcHons torThfrd TNrd
Onsart pags nunbersl-
May 8.1990.
3. Section 271.1(f) ia amended by
revising the entry for May 8,1990 In
Table 2 to read as follows:
9271.1 Purpose and 8copet
0)*
-------
22720
Federal Raster / Vol 55, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 1990 / Rules and Regulations
Table 2.—Self-Implementing Provisions of the Hazardous and Soud waste Amendments of 1984
Effect*®
owNnpsnivninQ ixuvumi
RCRA titaflon
Federal Register reference
Maw A 1QM
ProWbWon on land disposal of 3/3 of
Bated waste*.

[June 1. 1990 and page numbers of
this document.]

	
PART302—DESIGNATION,
REPORTABLE QUANTITIES, AND
NOTIFICATION
1. The authority citation for part 302
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 102 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response. Compensation, and
liability Act of 198a 42 U.S.C. 9602: sees. 311
and 501(a) of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, 33 U.&C. 1321 and 1381.
2. Section 302.4 is amended by adding
the following entry in alphabetical order
under the column "Hazardous
Substance" and adding as the first
footnote, footnote f to read as follows.
Footnotes 1* and 4 are republished.
{3024 Designation of Hazardous
SutelBftCMe
Hazardous Substanoo
CASftN
Regulatory Synonyms
RQ
Rna) RQ
Codet
RCRA
Waste
Number
Category
MUD Souro* Laactats.
i*
F039
1 (0.454)
J McatastlM statutory source a* defined by 1.2, $ and 4 Mow. • .
4—Mcatas that the statutory aouco for designation of tws hazardous sutetanoe under CERCLA t» RCRA Section 3001.
1* Indicate! that the 1-pound RQ Is «(^ROLA statutory RQt
[FR Doc. 00-12028 Filed 9-31-00; 448 am J
-------
-------
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS (LDRs)
APPENDICES
A-1: Type of LDR Restriction in Effect for Each RCRA Hazardous
Waste Code
A-2IA-3: Treatment Standards and Effective Dates for So/vent- and
Dioxin-Containing Wastes and California List Wastes
A-4: Treatment Standards and Effective Dates for First, Second,
and Third Third Wastes
A-5: Treatment Standards and Effective Dates for F039 Multi-
Source Leachate
JUNE 1990
*** DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
Note: This Document Has Not Been Reviewed By EPA Please Refer to
Revised 40 CFR Part 268 To Verify All Information
-------
APPENDIX A-1
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR
EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE
A-1 (a) - Characteristic, Solvent- and Dioxin-Containing, and First, Second, and Third
Third Wastes
A-2(b) - California List Wastes
JUNE 1990
* * DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * *
-------
APPENDIX A1 (e)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a). 1
Watte Code2,3
TVP.W
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
CHARACTERISTIC WASTES (40 CFR 261.21-.24)



DOOI
Ignltable Waste a
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/00
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1892
D002
Corrosive Wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1902
D003
Reactive Wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90 - 518/92
Treatment Standards • specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
D004
Arsenic
Nonwastewatera
•5/8/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992


5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standards ¦ concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90 - 518/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992

Inorganic solid debris
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
0005
Barium
All, except as noted below
Inorganic solid debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1092
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
		A-1(a).2
Watte Code*¦'
Type***
Data* Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Commente
D006
Cadmium
All, except as noted below
Cadmium batteries
8/8190
818190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Inorganic solid debris
•518/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
D007
Chromium
All, except as noted below
Inorganic solid debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
D008
Lead
All, except as noted below
Lead materials before
secondary smelting
8/8/90
*5/8/90- 518/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992


5/8/92 ¦ Final
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised

Inorganic solid debris
'5/8/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
• Restriction In effect lor period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •**
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a)J
Waste Code2"*
Type4**
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
D009
Mercury
Nonwastewaters with high
mercury (>_ 260 mg/kg)
*518190 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992


518192 - Final
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastewaters with low
mercury (< 260 mg/kg)
*5/0/90 - 518/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992


5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and Debris
*5/8190 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992

Inorganic solid debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension! Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
D010
Selenium
All, except as noted below
Inorganic solid debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
D011
Silver
All, except as noted below
Inorganic solid debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90 - 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
D012
Endrin
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards ¦ concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190 - 518/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a).4
Waste Code2-3
Type*M
Dates Restricted7
iype of Restriction
Comments
D013
Undone
Nonwastowatera
Wastewaters
818/90
8/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•518/90 - 518/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
D014
Methoxyclor
Nonwastowatera
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
D015
Toxaphene
Nonwastowatera
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•518/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1892
D016
2,4-D
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90 - 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1802
D017
2,4,5-TP Sihex
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levela
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•518/90 - 5/8192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1892
• Restriction In effect tor period noted.	• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
•"SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * <">
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 5
Waste Code*3	type**'	Dates Restricted1 Type of Restriction	Commanta
USTED WASTES (40 CFR 281.31-.33)
F001-F005	All, except as noted below	11/8/86 - Final	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
Spent Solvents
Solvent wastes trom small	11/8/88 - Final	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
quantity generators (SQQs)
(>100 kg/month and <1000	*11/8186-11/8/88 National Capacity Extension/
kg/month)	Minimum Technology Requirements
Solvent wastes generated	11/8/88 - Final	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
trom CERCLAJRCRA
corrective actions (except	•1118186- 11/8/88 NaOoftal Capacity Extension/
contaminated soil and debrisf	Minimum Technology Requirements
Initial generator's solvent-	11/8/88 -.Final	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
water mixtures, solvent-
containing sludges or solids, *11/8/86 - 11/8/88 National Capacity Extension/
or nort-CERCLAJRCRA	Minimum Technology Requirements
corrective action soils with <
1 percent total (F001-F005)
solvent constituents
Soil and debris from	11/8/88	National Capacity Extension/	Extension expires 11/8/90
CERCLA/RCRA corrective	Minimum Technology Requirements
actions
F002 nonwasteweters and	8/8/90	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
wastewaters (1,1,2-
trichloroethane and 2-
nltropropane)
F005 nonwastewaters and	818/90	Treatment Standards	Final, unless standards revised
wastewaters (benzene and 2-
ethaxyethenol)
Restriction In effect for period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a).6
Waste Code*'
Type
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
F006
Electroplating
wastes
Nonwastewatara
Nonwastawatera (Cyanides)
818/88
718189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
818/90
*8/8/88 - 5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
FOOT
Electroplating
wastes
All
7/8/89
*8/8/88 - 7/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels or
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements (for underground Injected wastes)
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised;
extension expires June 8, 1991, lor
underground Injection only
F008
Electroplating
wastes
All
7/8/89
*6/8/89 -7/8/89
*8/8/88 ¦ 6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Minimum Technology Requirements
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
F009
Electroplating
wastes
All
7/8/89
*6/8/89 - 7/8/89
*8/8/88 - 6/8/89
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Minimum Technology Standards
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
F010
Metal heat-treating
wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*6/8/89 - 6/8/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8.1991
• Restriction In effect for period noted.	*** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * " *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (m) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).7
Watte Cod
iype™
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
F011
Metal heat-treating
wastes
Nonwastewaters
12/8/89
•7/8/89 - 12/8/89
•6/8/89 - 7/8/89
Final Treatment Standards - concentration levels
(110 mg/kg for total cyanides and 9.1 mg/kg for
amenable cyanides)
Interim Treatment Standards - F007, F008, and
F009 nonwastewater standards 0.o., S90 mg/kg
for total cyanides and 30 mg/kg for amenable
cyanides)
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
7/8/89
•6/8/89 - 718/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
F012
Metal heat-treating
wastes
Nonwastewaters
12/8/89
•7/8/89 - 12/8/89
•6/8/89 - 7/8/89
Final Treatment Standards - concentration levels
(110 mg/kg for total cyanides and B.I mg/kg for
amenable cyanides)
Interim Treatment Standards - F007, F008, and
F009 nonwastewater standards (I.e., 890 mg/kg
for total cyanides and 30 mg/kg for amenable
cyanides)
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
7/8/89
•6/8/89 - 718/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
F019
Aluminum coating
wastes
All
8/8/90
•8/8/88 - 518/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
•••SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * *
-------


APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)


TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(»).8
Waste Code"
type**'
Dates Restricted7
Type el Restriction
Comments
F020-F023
Dloxln wastes from
chlorophenol and
chlorobenzene
production
Ail, except as noted below
Soil and debris from
CERCLAIRCRA corrective
actions
11/am
*1118198 ¦ 11/8/90
Treatment Standards
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Nov. 8,1990
F024
Chlorinated
Aliphatic
Hydrocarbon
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Nonwastawaters (metals)
6/8/89 - Final
*6/8189-5/8190
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels and
specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*618189-6/8191
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1991
F02S
Condensed light
ends, spent filters
and filter aids, and
spent deslccant
wastes from the
production of
certain chlorinated
allphatlca
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90-5/8192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
(newly Bated waste)
Extension expires May 8, 1992.
F02S-02B
Dloxln wastes from
chlorophenol and
chlorobenzene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris from
CERCLAIRCRA corrective
11/8/88
*11/8/88-11/8190
Treatment Standards
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Nov. 8,1990.
production	actions
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * • DRAFT 6/00 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 9
Watte Code*'
Type4"3"'
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comment*
F039
Multi-source
leachate
Nonwastewaters
*518190-518192
518192 ¦ Final
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Extension expires May 8, 1902.
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
818190
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1002.
K001
Wood preserving
wastes
All, except as noted below
Organlcs
818188
818190
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - revised concentration
levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*818188-818190
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1000.
K002
Chroma yellow and
orange pigment
production wastes
All
8/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K003
Molybdate orange
pigment production
wastes
All
818/00
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K004
Zinc yellow
pigment production
wastes
Nonwastewatera
Wastewaters
818190
*818188-6/8/89
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards • no land disposal
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	*** DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ** *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LOR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'¦
A-1(a).10
Waste Code2"'
Type**'
Datee Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K005
Chrome green
pigment production
wastes
Nonwastewatars
Nonwastewaters disposed ot
after June 8, 1989
8/8/90
•6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K006
Chrome oxide
green pigment
production wastes
All
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K007
Iron blue pigment
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
Nonwastewaters disposed of
alter June 8, 1989
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K008
Qreen pigment
chrome oxides
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
*8/8/88-6/8/89
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
K009	Nonwastewaters	618189	Treatment Standards - concentration levels	Final, unless standards revised
Acetaldehyde
production wastes Wastewaters	6/8/89	' Treatment Standards - concentration levels	Final, unless standards revised;
extension expires June 8, 1991, lor
underground Infection only
Soil and debris	"6/8/89-6/8191	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension expires June 8,1991
Requirements
Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
4 * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICVON IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1faf.11
Waste Coda*"*
Type"'
Dates Restricted*
Type of Restriction
Comment*
K010
Acetaldehyde
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8180
*6/0/09-6/0/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Juno 8, 1891
K011
Acrylonltrlla
production wastes
Nonwastewatere
6/0/09
*0/0/00-6/0/09
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
0/0/90
*0/6/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soil hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/0/09-6/0/9?
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1991
KOI 3
Acryfonltrlle
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
6/6/09
*0/0/00-6/0/09
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Solt hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
0/9/90
*0/0/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Sott hammer provisions
Final, unless standards rsvfsad

Soil and debris
*6/0/094/0/9)
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1991
KOU
Acrytonttrile
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
818189
*6/0/00-6/0/09
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
SoA hammer pmvtskms
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
0/0/90
*0/0/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Solt hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil end debris
6/0/09
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8, 1991
• Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
•"SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
	A-1(s).12
Wsste Code*'
Type**'
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
KOI 5
Benzyl chloride
distillation wastes
Nonwastewaters
818190
*818/88-512189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no tand disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
818/90
*818/88-512189
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
K016
Carbon
Tetrachloride
production wastes
AH, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8188
818/88
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension!
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1990
KOI 7
EpkMorohydrin
production wastes
All, except as noted behw
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
KOI 8
Ethyl chloride
production wastes
All, except as noted behw
SoB and debris
8/8/88
8/8/88
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension!
Minimum Technology Requirements
Fbtal, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1990
K019
Ethylene dlchloride
production wastes
An, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/88
*818/88-8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension!
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8,1990
K020
Vinyl chloride
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/88
*818/88-8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1990
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6100 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(»).13
Waste Cod**-'
Type4-5-*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K021
Fluoromethanea
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
Nonwastewaters disposed of
alter August 17, 1988
8/8/90
*5/2/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastewaters (all)
*8/8/88-5/2/89
Treatment Standards - no land disposal


Wastewaters
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1002
K022
Phenol/acetone
production wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/88
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soil hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*8/8/88-8/8/90
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires Aug. 8,1090
K023
Phthallc anhydride
production wastes
All. except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Juno 8, 1991
K024
Phthallc anhydride
production
wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/88
*8/8/88-8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1090
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
***SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
AZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).14
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
Wart* Coda*'	iyp»iM	Date* Restricted7 Type of Restriction	Comments
K025
Nitrobenzene
production wastes
Nonwastewatera
Nonwas tewa tors disposed of
after August 17, 1988
Nonwastewatera (all)
Wastewaters
Soil and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*512/89-518190	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
*8/8/88-5/2/89	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-5/8/90	Sofl hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
K026
Methyl ethyl
pyridines
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards • specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K027
Toluene
dllsocyanate
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National. Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
K028
1.1.1-
Trichloroethane
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Nonwastewatera (metals)
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
8/8/90	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
Restriction In effect for period noted.
** * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
**'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).15
Waste Code*-*
VP*"'
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K029
1.1.1-
Trichloroethane
production wastes
Nonwastewatera
618189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Wastewaters
8/8190
*618189-518100
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•618/89-618/91
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1991
K030
Trichlomethytene &
perchloroethylena
production wastes
All. except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/88
•818/88-8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8,1990
K031
MSMA A cacodyllc
acid production
wastes
Nonwastewatera
•518/90-5/8/92
5/8/90 - Final
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Extension expires May 8,1892
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
•818/88-5/8/90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
•518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K032
Chlordane
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
•518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K033
Chlordane
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
•518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
• Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE '«*
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •••
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 16
Waste Codav
Type4"*''
Dates Restricted7
Typo of Restriction
Comments
K034
Chlordane
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8190
*518190-5/8192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K03S
Creosote
production wastes
All, except as noted below
818190
*818188-518190
Treatment technology - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K038
Dlaulfoton
production wastes
Nonwastewatera
Nonwastewatera disposed of
after August 17, 1983
8/8/90
*5/2/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastewatera (all)
*8/8188-5/2/89
Treatment Standards - no land disposal


Wastewaters
6/8/89
*8/8/88-6/8189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K037
Dlsulfoton
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Wastewaters
8/8/88
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - revised concentration
levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*8/8/88 - 8/8/90
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires Aug. 8,1990
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 17
Waato Code*'
lypo

Date a Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Commenta
K038
Phomta production
wastes
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
618/89	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*618189-618191	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
K039
Phorate production
Hlter cakes
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
6/8/89
*6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards ¦ specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
K040	All, except as noted below	6/8/89
Phorate production
wastes	Soil and debris	*6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
K041
Toxaphene
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*6/8/89-5/8/90	Soli hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K042
2.4,S-T production
wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*618/89-5/8190	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-518/92	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K043
2,4-D production
wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	*** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTBICVON IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
				A-1(a).18
Watte Code*"

Dates Restricted7
iype of Restriction
Comments
K044
Explosives
production wastes
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88 5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/0/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8.1992
K04S
Spent carbon from
explosives
treatment
AH, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
*5/8/90-518/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards • no land disposal
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
K046
Wastes from Lead-
based Initiating
compounds
Nonreactive nonwastewaters
Reactive nonwastewaters
8/8/88
8/8/90
*818/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters (reactive and
nonreactive)
8/8/90
*8/8/88-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
K047
TNT operations
waste
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90- 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restrict/on In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
' * 'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).19
Watt* Cod*2-*
T)fpe
,4M
Dataa Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comment*
K048
Petroleum refining
Industry wastes
Nonwastewaters
*5/8/90- 11/8/90 National Capacity Extension!
Minimum Technology Requirements
Wastewaters
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
K049
Petroleum refining
Industry wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
1118/90-Final
8/8/90
*818/88 - 8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
*5/8/90 - 1118/90 National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
11/8/90 • Final	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
8/8/90	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*8/8/88-8/8/90	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires November 8, 1990
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Originally restricted In First Third rule
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Extension expires November 8, 1990
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Originally restricted In First Third rvle
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Restriction In effect for period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).20
Wast* Code*-1
TVp.
,W
Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comments
K050
Petroleum refining
Industry wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
*518190-11/8/90
11/8/90 -Final
8/8/90
*8/8/88-8/8/90
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires November 8,1990
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Originally restricted In First Third rule
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K051
Petroleum refining
Industry wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
*518/90-13/8/90	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
1118/90 - Final	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
8/8190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
•8/8/89-818/90	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires November 8,1990
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Originally restricted In First Third rule
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In ellect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).21
Waste Coda2,1
Type

Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comments
K052
Petroleum refining
Industry wastes
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
•518190-1118190
11/8190 -Final
818190
•8/8/88-818/90
*5/8190-518/92
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity ExtensionI
Minimum Technology Requirements
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires November 8, 1990
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Rescheduled to Third Third rule; final,
unless standards revised
Originally restricted In First Third rule
Extension expires May 8,1992
K060
Coking operations
wastes
Nonwastewaters
Nonwastewaters disposed of
after August 17, 1988
Nonwastewaters (all)
Wastewaters
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/2/89-5/8190	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
*8/8/88-512/89	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
818/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*818/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
•5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1892
* Restriction In ettect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
•••SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 269 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICVON IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1M-22
Waste Code*"*
IVp.

Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comment*
K061
Electric furnace
steal production
wastes
Nonwastewaters • high zinc
(>_ IS percent total zinc)
Nonwastewaters - lour zinc
(< 15 percent total zinc)
*818188 - 8/8/91	Interim Treatment Standards - concentration
levels
8/8/91 - Final	Treatment Standards - specified technology
8/8/88	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Until August 8, 1091
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Wastewaters
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88 - 5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
K062
Steel finishing
spent pickle liquor
All
818/88
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K06 9
Secondary lead
smelting wastes
Nonwastewaters with calcium
sultate
Nonwastewaters without
calcium sulfate
Nonwastewaters without
calcium sulfate disposed of
after August 17, 1988
Nonwastewaters without
calcium sulfate (all)
Wastewaters
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*8/8/88-5/8190	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
*5/2/89-5/8/90	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
*8/8/88-5/2/89	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88 - 5/8/90	Soli hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------


APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)


TYPE OF LDR RESTRICVON IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).23
Waste Code*-'
TVp.w
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K071
Chlorine production
wastes
All
*8/8188-8/8/90
8/8/90
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Extension expires Aug. 8.1990.
Final, unless standards revised
K073
Chlorine production
wastes
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*818/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K083
Aniline production
wastes
Nonwastewatera - no ash
(<0.01 percent total ash)
8/8/90
*8/8188-5/2/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastewatera with
detectable ash and
wastewaters
5/8/90
*8/8/88 - 5/2/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*8/8/88 - 512/89
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
K084
Veterinary
pharmaceuticals
production wastes
Nonwastewatera
*5/8/90-5/8/92
5/8/92 - Final
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Fined, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * «
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a)£4
Waste Code2'3
Type4'5'*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K085
Chlorobenzene
production wastes
All, except as noted below
818190
*818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
K086
Ink production
wastes
Solvent washes, non-soil and
debris
8/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - revised concentration
levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Solvent washea, soil and
debris
*818/88-8/8/90
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Extension expires Aug. 8,1990

Solvent sludges and caustic
water and sludge
8/8/90
*8/8188-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
K087
Coking operations
wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/88
*8/8188-8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8,1990
K093
Phthallc anhydride
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
K094
Phthallc anhydride
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*618/89-6/8/91
¦ Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/
Minimum Technology Requirements
Find, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
• Restriction In effect for period noted.	' * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION **•
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a)J5
Wast* Code3-3
Type4-*1
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K095
1,1,1-trlchloro-
ethane production
wastes
Nonwastewatera
Wastewaters
6/8189
8/8100
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/8/89-6/8191
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1991
K096
1,1,1 trtchloro-
ethane production
wastes
Nonwastewatera
Wastewaters
6/8/89
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/8/89-6/8/91
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8, 1991
K097
Chlordane
production wastes
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K098
Toxaphene
production wastes
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
K099
2,4-D production
wastes
All
8/8/88
Treatment Standards ¦ concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • •
"'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF HOT RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(s).28
Waste Code1,1	Type4'5'*	Dates Restricted7 Typo of Restriction	Comment*
K100
Secondary lead
smelting wastes
Nonwastewaters
Nonwastewaters disposed of
after August 17, 1988
Nonwas tewatera (all)
8/8190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*512/89-518/90	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
•8/8/88-5/2189	Treatment Standards - no land disposal
Final, unless standards revised
Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
K101
Veterinary
pharmaceuticals
production wastes
Nonwastewaters with high	8/8/88
arsenic (>_ 1 percent total
arsenic)
Nonwastewaters (except for	8/8/88
soil and debris) with low
arsenic (< 1 percent total
arsenic)
Wastewaters	8/8/88
Soil and debris with low	8/8/88
arsenic (< 1 percent total
arsenic)
Soft hammer provisions
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Effective until EPA sets treatment
standards or May 8, 1990, when the
hard hammer Mis
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8, 1990
" Restriction In eHect lor perlod'hoted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (s) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1 (a).27
Watte Code*"'	7yp»w	Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction	Commentm
K102
Veterinary
pharmaceuticals
production wastes
Nonwastewatera with high
arsenic (>_ 1 percent total
arsenic)
Nonwastewatera (except for
soil and debris) with low
arsenic (< 1 percent total
arsenic)
Wastewaters
Soil and debris with low
arsenic (< 1 percent total
arsenic)
818(88
8/8188
818188
*818188 - 8/8190
Soft hammer provisions
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Effective until EPA sets treatment
standards or May 8,1090, when the
hard hammer falls
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension expires Aug. 8,1990
Requirements
K103
Aniline production
wastes
All, except as noted
Soil and debris
8/8/88	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88 - 8/8/90	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8,1090
K104
Nitrobenzene/
aniline production
wastes
All, except as noted
Soil and debris
8/8/88	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88 - 8/8/90	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires Aug. 8,1900
K105
Chlorobenzene
production wastes
All,- except as noted below
Soil end debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
•6/8/89-518/90	Soft hammer provisions
•5/8/90-518/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
" Restriction In effect for period noted.
• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a).28
Waste Code*'
Type4,5"*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Commenta
K106
Chlorine production
wastes
Nonwastewatera (high and
low arsenic)
Nonwaslewatars (high
arsenic)
•5/8/90-5/8/92
5/8/92 - Final
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastewatera (low arsenic)
5/8192 - Final
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
•8/8188-5/8)90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 0,1992
Kill a
Dlnltrotoluene
production wastes

To be determined
N/A
HSWA requires EPA to set standards
within six months of Hating, but no
hammers apply
K1128
Toluenedlamlne
production wastes

To be determined
N/A
HSWA requires EPA to set standards
within six months of listing, but no
hammers apply
K113
Toluenedlamlne
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
•6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
K114
Toluenedlamlne
production wastes
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
•6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards • specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
• Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • *
•••SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •••
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).29
Waste Coda*-'
iyp«
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(»).30
Waste Code"
iy»»w
Datea Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
K1380
Ethylene dlbromlde
All
To be determined
NA
HSWA requires EPA to set standards
within sbe months of listing, but no
hammers apply
P001
Warfarin. > 0.3
percent
All, except aa noted below
818/90
•818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P002
1 -Acetyf-2-thlourea
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•6/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P003
Acrolein
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expiree May 8,1992
P004
Aldrin
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
• Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).31
Waste Code*1'
iyp«w
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P005
Allyl alcohol
All, except as noted below
818190
*8/0/88-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*5/0/90-5/0/02
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8.1992
POOS
Aluminum
phosphide
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90
*518190-5/8192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P007
5-(Amlnoethyl)-3-
Isoxazolol
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
POOS
4-Amlnopyridine
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
POOS
Ammonium plcrate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
' * Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
"'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " * *
-------
APPENDIX A1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LOR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	A-1(a).32
Watte Code*'
rype^'
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P010
Arsenic acid
Nonwastewatera
*5/8190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992


5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8190
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debrla
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8. 1992
P011
Arsenic (V) oxide
Nonwastewatera
*5/8/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992


5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*818/88-5/8/90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debrla
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P012
Arsenic (III) oxide
Nonwastewatera
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992


5/8192 - Final
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8190
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In ettect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).33
Waste Code*'
Type4-**
Datee Restricted7
T^pe of Restriction
Comments
P013
Barium cyanide
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
P014
Thlophenol
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*618/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
' Extension expires May 8, 1902
P01S
Beryllium dust
All
8/8/90
*8/8/88 - 518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
P018
Bls-(chloro-methyl)
ether
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•818/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1092
P017
Bromoacetone
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-518192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1902
P018
Bruclne
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*818/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1002
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).34
Waste Code*-'
Type"*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P020
Dlnoseb
All, except as noted below
0/0/90
*8/8188 518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
. Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P021
Calcium cyanide
All
6/8189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
P022
Carbon disulfide
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unlesa standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P023
Chloroacetalde-
hyde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension! Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P024
p-Chloroanlline
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expiree May 8,1992
P026
1 -(o-Chloro-phenyl)
thiourea
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*618/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unlesa standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
* • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * °
-------
APPENDIX 4-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICVON IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a)J5
Waste Code
Type™
Datem Restricted7-
Type of Re friction
Comments
P027
Propanenltrile, 3-
chloro
All, except as noted below
8/0/90
*6/8/89-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1892
P028
Benzyl chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90
*5/8/90- 5/0/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1092
P029
Copper cyanides
All
6/0/09
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
¦ ¦ ¦¦
P030
Soluble cyanide
salts (NOS)
All
6/8/89
*8/8/88-6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
P031
Cyanogen
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P033
Cyanogen chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P034
4,6-Dlnltro-o-
cyclohaxytphenol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction in effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
*** SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a).38
Waste Coda
Typ^
Dataa Restricted7
Type ot Restriction
Comments
P038
Dlchlorophenyt-
arslne
Nonwastewatera
*5/8190-5/8192
5/8/92 - Final
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Extension expires May 8,1982
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Soli hammer provisions


Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P037
Dleldrin
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1892
P03S
Dlethyiarslne
Nonwastewatera
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1882


5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1882
P039
Dlsulloton
All, except as noted below
6/8/89
*8/8/88-6/8/89
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/8/89-6/8/91
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8, 1881
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
*** SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(»y37
Watt* Cod
Typo
AM
Da tea Restricted7 Type ot Restriction
Comment»
P040
O.O-Dlethyl o-
pyrazlnyt
phosphorothloate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-618/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
P041
Dlethyl-p-nltro-
phenyl phosphate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*8/8/88418/89
*6/8/89-6/8191
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
P042
Epinephrine
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1092
P043
Dllsopropyl
fluorophosphate
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
P044
Dlmethoate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
P04S
Thlofanox
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-518/92	National Capacity Extension/ Minimum
Technology Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	*** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* • 'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX 4-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE*
A-1(e).3B
Wast* Cede*"'
TVP*
«•
Date* Restricted7 Type at Restriction
Comment*
P040
Alpha, alpha-
DlmethylphonBthyt-
amlno
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards • specified technology
*5/8190-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P047
4,8-Dlnltro-o-cresol
and salts
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8.1992
P048
2,4 Dlnltrophenol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8190	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P049
2,4-Dlthlobluret
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standarda - apeclHed technology
*6/8/89-5/8190	'Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standarda revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P050
Endosulfan
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standarda - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P051
Endrin
All. except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standarda - concentration levels
*5/8/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standarda revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF U)R RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a^39
Watte Code*-*
iype
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LOR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCfM HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	A-ffaJ.40
Watte Code**
iyp«*M
Datea Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
poeo
Isodrln
All, except aa noted below
8/8190
•618/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standaida - concentration fovefo
Soil hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/9*5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P062
Haxaathyttetra-
phoaphaia
AU, except aa noted below
Soil and debrla
8/8/89
*6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unlesa standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
P063
Hydrogen cyanide
All
6/8/89
•8/8/88 - 6/8/89
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Son hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
P064
Methyl laocyanata
An, except aa noted below
Soil and debrta
8/8/90
•5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standaida - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unleaa standards revised
Extension expiree May 8,1992
P06S
Mercury fulminate
Nonwaatewatara (all)
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity ExtanalonlMlntnuMn Technology
Requirements
Extanabn expiree May 8,1992

Nonwaatewatara (high
mercury)
5l8f92-Final
Treatment Standarda - apecSled technology
Final, unless standarda ravtoed

Nonwaatowatara (low
mercury)
5/8/92 - Final
Treatment Standarda - concentration levela
Final, unleaa atandarda revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unleaa atandarda reviaed

Soil and Debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 288 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).41
Mfaato Cods4'

Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comment»
P06S
Methomyl
All, except aa noted below
818190
*618/89-518190
Treatment Standards - spec/Had technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unleaa standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190*18/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P067
2-Methylazlridlne
All, except aa noted below
818/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debrla
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P068
Methyl Hydrazine
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debrla
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P069
Methyllactonltrlle
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unleaa standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P070
Aldlcarb
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
***SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * e *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
		A-ffaJ.42
Watto Code*-'
Type4'"'*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P071
Methyl parathlon
All, except as noted below
618189
*8/8/88-6/8/09
Treatment Standards - concentration /avs/s
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*618189-6)8191
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension ejtp/res June 8,1991
P072
ANTU
All, except as noted below
818/90
*618/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8.1892
P073
Nickel Carbonyl
All
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, urUess standards mvlsed
P074
Nickel Cyanide
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
P07S
Nicotine and salts
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1892
P076
Nitric oxide
All
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
P077
p-Nltroanlllne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90 5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1892
P078
Nitrogen dioxide
All
8/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Final, unless standards revised
* Restrict/on In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE " " '
*'* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(apt3
Waste Code3-1
Type4-**
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P081
Nitroglycerine
All, except as noted below
a/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P082
N-Nltrosodl-
methylamlne
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

All
•8/8/88-518/90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P084
N-Nltroaomethyl-
vlrtylamlne
All, except as noted below
818/90
•8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - speclHed technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P08S
Octamethyipyro-
phosphoramlde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
•6/818*6/8/91
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
P087
Osmium Tetraoxlde
All, except as noted below
•5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8.1992


5/8/92-Flnal
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	• • * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •••
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued}
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 44
Watte Coda*-'
1VP*"'
Dates Restricted1
iypa of Restriction
Commanta
P088
Endothall
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190
*5/8/90-518/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8. 1092
P089
Parathlon
All, except as noted below
6/0/09
*8/8/88-6/8189
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/8/89-6/8/91
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8,1091
P002
Phenylmercuric
acetate
Nonwastowaters (all)
Nonwastewatera (high
mercury)
*5/8/90-5/8/92
5/8/92-Flnal
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Extension expires May 8,1002
Final, unless standards revised

Nonwastowaters (low
mercury)
5/8/92-Flnal
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Soft hammer provisions


Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1002
P093
N-Pherryithlourea
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8l92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 0,1002
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
• • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(b).4S
Waste Coda*®
TVpe

Dotes Restricted7 Type ot Restriction
Comments
P094
Phorale
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-6/8/89	Soft hammer provisions
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
P095
Phosgene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8190-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
P096
Phosphlne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P097
Famphur
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-6/8/69	Soft hammer provisions
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
P098
Potassium cyanide
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
P099
Potassium silver
cyanide
P101
Propanenltrile
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/00-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension expires May 8, 1992
Requirements
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	*** DRAFT 6/90 • DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
*** SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
		A-1(*).4S
Waste Code**
Type**'
Date a Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P102
Propargyt alcohol
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•8/8188-5/8190
Treatment standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and dabfia
*5/819*5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8,1982
P103
Seienourea
All
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
PI 04
Silver cyanide
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
PI 05
Sodium azlde
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P106
Sodium cyanide
All
618/80
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
P108
Strychnine and
aalta
All, except aa noted below
818/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standarda - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
PI 09
Tetraathyldlthlo-
pyrophosphate
All. except aa noted below
Soil and debris
618/89
•618/89-6/8191
Treatment Standarda • specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expiree June 0,1991
• Restriction In eflect lor period noted.	• • * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
••* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •••
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(m).47
Waste Code2-3
Type™
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
P110
Tetraethyi lead
All
818/90
*8/8188-516190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Pill
Tetraethytpyro-
phosphoramlde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
618/89
*6/8189-618/91
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Copacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
P112
Tetrenltromethane
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8189-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
P113
Thalllc oxtda
Nonwaatewaters
Wastewaters
6/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

All
*6/8189-5/8/90
Soft hammer provisions

P114
Thallium (1)
selanlta
All
8/8/90
*6/8189-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration standards
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
P11S
Thallium 0)
sulfate
Nonwastewatora
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

All
*8/8/88-5/8190
Soft hammer provisions

P116
Thlosemlcarbazlde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
Requirements
* Restriction In eflect tor period noted.	* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
Ar1(m)M
Waste Code"
TVP*
AM
Date* Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comments
P118
Trlchloromethane-
thlol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
018190	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/0/00-3/8/02	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P110
Ammonium
vanadate
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
0/0/90
0/0/90
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
P120
Vanadium
pentoxtde
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
AH
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*818/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
P121
Zinc cyanide
All
6/8/89
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unlma standards revised
P122
Zinc phosphide,
>10 percent
A/I, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - spec/Bed technology
•0/0/00-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
P123
Toxaphene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
•8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/02	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U001
Acetaldehyde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8. 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ML INFORMATION * * a
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).49
Watte Code*-'
Tyjn*"
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U002
Acetone
All, except as noted below
818190
*618189-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1892
U003
Acetonttrile
Nonwastewatera
Wastewaters
818190
818190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*5/8/90-518/92
*818/89-518/90
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Soft hammer provisions
Extension expiree May 8,1892
U004
Acetophenono
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8190-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1082
U005
o-Acetyiamino-
Huorene
All, except as noted below
818190
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1692
U006
Acetyl chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expiree May 8,1992
* Restriction in effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
0 * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).50
Waste Code**
iypow
Dates Restricted'
Type of Restriction
Comments
U007
Acryiamlde
All, except aa noted below
918/90
*818/8^5/8/90
Treatment Standarda • specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, uniesa standarda revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U009
Acrylic add
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standarda - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standarda revised

Soil and debria
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U009
Acrylonltriie
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, uniesa standarda revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U010
Mitomycin C
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
8/8I88-5I8/90
Treatment Standarda - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standarda revised

Soil and debria
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U011
Amltrole
All, except aa noted below
6/8/90
6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standarda - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, uniesa standarda revised

Soil and debria
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extenalon expiree May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
° * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 263 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ** *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LOR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).51
Watte Code*-1

Datea Restricted1
Type ot Restriction
Comments
U012
Aniline
All
818190
*818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U014
Auramfne
All, except as noted below
8/8190
*618189-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8. 1992
U01S
Azasertne
All, except aa noted below
818190
*618189-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Solt hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*518190-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U016
Benz(c)acrldlne
All, except as noted below
8/8190
*818/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U017
Benzol chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
*5/8190-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 0, 1992
U018
Benz(a)anthracene
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8188-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
. Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
	A-1(a).52
Watte Code**
iyp«w
Dates Restricted1
Type of Restriction
Comments
U019
Benzene
All, except as noted below
818190
*1818188-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U020
Benzeneaultonyi
chloride
All. except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U021
Benzidine
Afl, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•518/9*518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U022
Benzo(a)pyrena
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U023
Benzotrlchlorlde
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unleaa standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extenshn/Mlnhmm Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	*** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).B3
Watt* Coda*•*
¦type
AM
Dates Restricted1 Type of Restriction
Commute
U024
Bls(2-chloro-
ethoxy)methane
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1892
U025
Dlchloroetiiyi ether
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*6/0/09-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/00-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U028
Chlomaphazlne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/0/09-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U027
BJs(2-chlorolso-
propyl)ether
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/0/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*518190-518192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U028
Bls(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
U029
Methyl bromide
All, except as noted below	8/8/89
Soil and debris	6/0/09
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*0/0/00-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 0/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-lfaf.54
Waste Cod•*'
iyp«

Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comments
U030
Benzene, 1-bromo-
tptienoxy
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/8/80-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1002
U031
n-Butanol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*818188-518190
*518/90-518/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U032
Calcium chromate
All
818/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U033
Carbonyt fluoride
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8190-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1092
U034
Chloral
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards • specified technology
*518/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expiree May 8, 1092
U035
Chlorambucil
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
818190	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8/89-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1002
* Restriction in effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
**'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(s).55
Waste Code*-'

Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U038
Chlordane,
technical
All, except aa noted below
8/BI90
•818/88-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518190*18192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U037
Chlorobenzene
All, except as noted below
8/8190
•8/88/88*18/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90*18/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
1/030
Ethyt-4-4-dl-
chlorobenzllate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90*18192
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U030
4-Chloro-m-cresol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90*18/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U041
n-Chtoro-2,3-
epoxypropane
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/88*18/90
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90*18/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U042
Vinyl ether 2-
chloroethyl
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90*18/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements '
Extension expires May 8, 1992
• Restriction In effect tor period noted.	••• DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
"•SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMAVON • • •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(s).5»
Waste Code2-'
Type*5-*
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U043
Vinyl chloride
All, except as noted below
818190
*818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/905/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8,1992
U044
Chloroform
All, except aa noted below
818190
*818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U04S
Methyl chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U046
Chloromethyt
methyl ether
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8188-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unfesa etandarde revised

Soli and debris
*5/8/90- 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U047
Beta-chloro-
naphthalene
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*618189-5/8190
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U048
o-Chlomphenol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/9*5/8192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
*** SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1 (a). 57
Waste Coda*-*
iyp*w
Datee Restricted7
Type ol Restriction
Comments
U049
4-Chloro-o-
toluldlna,
hydrochloride
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
816190
*818189-518190
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revfsad
Extension expires May 8. 1992
U050
Chrysene
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*0/0/00-5/19/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity ExtanslonlMlnlmum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U031
Creosote
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
•0/0/08-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provlalons
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
•5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity ExtanslonlMlnlmum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U052
Creaola
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
0/0/90
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levela
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U053
Crotonaldahyde
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
•0/0/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U055
Cumene
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
0/0/90
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
• Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * 0
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
			 A-1(a).SB
Watte CodeM
Type4"*1*
Date* Restricted*
Type of Restriction
Comments
U0S6
Cyclohaxane
All, except as noted below
Soil and debrta
8/8190
*5/8/90*18/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extanslon/Mlnlmum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U0S7
Cyclohaxanone
Nonwaatewatera
8/8190
*6/8189-8/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Fined, unless standards revised

Wastewaters
8/8/90
*6/8/8*5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and Debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
uosa
Cyclophosphamide
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
6/8/89
*6/8/89-6/8191
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U059
Daurtomycln
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U060
ODD
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).59
Waste Cod***
iyp«w
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U061
DDT
All, except aa noted below
8/8/00
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soil hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U062
Dlallate
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/90-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U063
Dibenzo(a.h)
anthracene
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*818/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U064
1,2,7,8 Dlbemo-
pyrene
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U066 .
Dlbromo-3-chloro-
propane 1,2
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In ellact lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	A-1(s).60
IKute Code1'*
Type4'*''
Dates Restricted7
iyp* of Restriction
Comments
U067
Ethylene dlbromlde
All, except as noted below
818190
*818/88-518100
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*518/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U068
Methane, dlbromo
AO, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190
*518190-518192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U069
Dlbutyf phthalate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
618189
*818189-618191
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U070
o-Dlchlorobenzeno
All, except as noted below
818/90
*618/89-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U071
m-Dlchlorobenzene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
•5/8/90-5I8I92
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U072
p-Dlchlorobenzene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
* • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * "
***SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDP RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).61
Waste Code*'
1Vpa<*9
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U073
Dlchlorobenzldene
3.3-
All, except aa noted below
818190
*818/88-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/60-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U074
1,4-Dlch!oro-2-
butene
All, except aa noted below
818190
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U075
Dlchlorodlfluoro-
methane
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U076
Ethane, 1,1-
dlchloro-
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U0T7
Ethane, 1,2-dlchloro
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires Maty 8, 1992
U078
Dlchloroethylene,
1.1-
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
	t	
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY AIL INFORMATION * 4 *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-ffaJ.62
Watt* Cod
iyp*
Mt
Dates Restricted7 typa of Restriction
Comments
U079
1,2-Dlchloro-
ethylene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190
•518190-518192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U080
Methylene chloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*818189-518/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-518/82	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U081	AH, except as noted below	8/8/90
2,4-Dlchloro-phenol
Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U082	All, except as noted below	8/8/90
2,6-DkMom-phenol
Soil and debris	•518/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U083
Dlchforopropane,
1.2-
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
•8/8/89-5/8/90
•5/8/90-518/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U084
1,3-Dlchloro-
propene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
' Restriction In effect lor period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-ff0j.es
Waste Cwto**
7yp.
W
Date a Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comment*
U085
2,2-Bloxlrana
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
818/00	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/0/80-5/0/02	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U086
NJi Dlethythydra-
zlne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
"8/8/88-518/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/02	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U087
0,0-DlethytS-
methyt-dtthlo-
phosphate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/69	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*6/8189-618191	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U088
Diethyl phthalate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89
*6/8/89-618/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U089
Dlethylstll-bestrol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*0/0/00-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8190-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U090
Dlhydrosafrole
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/0/00-5/0/02
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
	 A-1 (a).64
Waste Coda*1

Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U091
3,3 Dimethoxyben-
zidino
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*518/90-518192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U082
Dlmothyiamlne
All, except as noted below
818190
*818189-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U093
Dimethylamlnoazo-
benzene
All, except as noted below
818/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U094
Dlmethytbemfa)
anthracene,7,12-
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U099
Dlmothylbamt-
dine, 3,3-
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/8*5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U096
alpha,alpha-
Dlmethyibenzyi-
hydroxyperoxlda
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 266 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	 A-1(a).t5
Waste Cod
Type4-*'
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
UOQ7
Dlmethylcarbamoyt
chloride
All, except aa noted below
0/8/00
•6/0/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*9/0/90-5/0/02
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U098
Dlmethythydrailne,
1.1-
All, except aa noted below
818/90
•618189-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U099
Dlmathyihydrazlne,
1.2-
Ml, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soli hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U101
Dlmethylphenol,
2.4-
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U102
Dimethyl phthalate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
6/0/09
6/0/09
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	 	 	A-1(a).66
Watte Code*'
Type4'8'*
Dates Restricted7
type at Restriction
Comments
U103
Dimethyl sulfates
All, except as noted below
018/90
'8/8/88-5/8/00
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and dabria
•5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U10S
2,4-DMtro-totuene
All, except u noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U106
Dlnltrotoluene,
2.6-
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•6/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U107
Dl-n-octyi phthalale
All, except as noted below
Soil and debrie
6/8/89
•6/8/89-6/8/91
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U109
Dloxane, 1,4-
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Restriction In effect for period noted.
• * * DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE " * •
* 4 SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
			 	 A-1(a).67
Watt* Code*'

Datea Rettrlcted7
typa of Restriction
Comments
moo
1,2-Dlphenyl-
hydrarina
All, except aa noted below
8/8100
*6/0/89-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standarda revised

Soil and debris
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1892
U110
Dlpropyiamlna
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U111
Dt-N-
Propylnltrosamlne
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extfinslon/Mlnlmum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1902
U112
Ethyl acetate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
0/0/90
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standarda - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1902
U113
Ethyl acrylate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
0/0/90
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standarda - apeclfled technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standarda revised
Extension expiree May 8, 1902
U114
Ethylenebls-
(dlthlocarbamlc
acid)
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90
•618/89-518/00
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standarda - apeclfled technology
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards re/vised
Extension expires May 8, 1002
* Restriction In ellact lor period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	Ar1(»).98
Waste Code*3
ryp.^
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
ill 15
Ethylene axlda
All, except as noted below
8/8100
*818188-518/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soli hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

SoU and debris
*518190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U116
Ethylene thiourea
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8189-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and dabria
*5/8190-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U117
Ethyl ether
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U118
Ethylmethacrylate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U119
Ethyl Methaneaul-
lonata
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
. National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements

U120
Fluomnthena
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria ¦
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
" Restriction In eflect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).6»
Waste Cod**'
iyp*
,W
Dates Restricted1 Type of Restriction
Comment*
U121
Trichloromono-
fluoromethane
All, except as noted below
Soli and debria
818/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/0/90-5/0/02	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1882
U122
Formaldehyde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debits
8/8/80	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*8/8/88-5/8/80	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1882
U123
Formic acid
All, except as noted below	8/8/80
Soil end debris	*5/0/90^/0/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1882
U124
Furan
Ml, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/80	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*0/0/00-5/0/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8.1092
U125
Furfural
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/80	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8. 1882
U128
Qlycldylaldehyde
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/80	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/0/90-5/0/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1882
Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * »
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	A-1(a).70
Watte Cod**-'
TV?*™
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comment*
U127
Hexachloro-
benzene
All, except aa noted below
8/8190
*618189-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debrta
*518190-518192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U128
Hexachlorobuta-
dlena
All, except aa noted below
818190
*818189-818190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/0/90-5/8/82
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8,1992
U129
Lindane
All, except aa noted below
818190
*818188-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debrta
*5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U130
Hexachlom-
cyclopentadlene
All, except as noted below
818/90
*8/8189-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
tun
Soli and dabris
*5/8190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Hexachloroethane
All, except aa noted below
818/90
*8/8189-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levela
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unlesa standards revised

Soil and debrla
*518190-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
Restriction In effect for period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF UJR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).71
Watte Code*-1
Type

Oat*e Rettrlctod7 Type of Restriction
Comments
U132	All, except as noted below	818190
Hexachlorophene
Soil and debris	*5/8/9*5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1892
U133
Hydrazine
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U134
Hydrofluoric add
Nonwaatewatera
Wastewaters
All
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
U13S
Hydrogen sulfide
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8190	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*618/89-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U136
Cacodylic acid
Nonwastewaters
Wastewaters
Soil and debris
*5/8190-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
5/8/92 - Final	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	 A-1(a).72
Wast* Code2-*
type***
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U137
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrana
AJI, except as noted below
8/8/80
*8/8199-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*5/8190-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U138
Methyl lodlda
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Sott hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/9/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U140
Isobutyi alcohol
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Sott hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/819*518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U141
Isosafrole
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U142
Kepone
AO, except as noted below
818/90
*6/8189-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*518/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * " *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION <"• *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
	 	 A-1(a).73
Watte Code*-'
Type**'
Date a Restricted7
Type ot Restriction
Comments
U143
Laalocarplne
All, except aa noted below
8/8190
*6/0/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*6/8/90-6/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U144
Lead acetate
All
8/8/90
*618189-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U145
Lead phosphate
AU
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
U148
Lead aubacetate
All
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U147
Malelo anhydride
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U148
Malelc hydrazlde
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U14 0
Malononttrlle
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
	 A-1(af.74
Wist* Code*-*
lypa***
Date a Restricted7
l>pa of Restriction
Comments
U1B0
Melphaian
All, except aa noted below
818/90
*618/89-518190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1S1
Mercury
Nonwastewatera
*5/8/90-518/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992

Wastewater
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1962
U152
Methactylonltrile
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1S3
Methanethlol
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U154
Methanol
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards • specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8190-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).75
Watte Cod
tyP®

Date* Restricted7 Type o1 Restriction
Comment*
U155
Methapyrllene
All, except as noted below
Soil and deMs
A/0/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*0/0/88-5/8/80	Soft hammer provisions
*5/0/90-5/0/82	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1S6
Methyl
chlorocarbonate
All, except as noted below
Soil and debrfa
8/0/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8190-518/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U157
3-Methytchol-
anthrene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debits
818190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/0/08-5/8/80	Soil hammer provisions
*5/8/80-5/8/82	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8. 1992
U158
4,4-Methytene-bla-
(2-chloroanlllne)
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/80	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/82	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1S9
Methyl ethyl ketone
All. except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U180	All, except as noted below	8/8190
Methyl ethyl ketone
peroxide	Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
6 Restriction In effect tor period noted.
-------
Xf»FEN3XA-t ft}
TYFE Of LDff HESTtl)CT70N IN EFFECT FOfl EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE COOf*
				_					 	 A-ff*K7«
•toils Cwrt"

Ds/»# Rtstncted'
Typ* oS n»rtrtci)Pfl
cotrafewat
i/rai
Usa^iaobulyl
A", azxfit jo nIM kA»
•mtS&SiSteO
SiMfinranf SBuufarafe - cofiifcTSSsfon te»:»
5o/f faunjTWfp,DJ^t&fi4
Bnaf, tm/esa standards mvbod

¦Foif'-snd u"»fto
*«ftSfrS,3Wi?
flaHtxiol Capatify &J»ns?£»,'fcfei(»J>urt7 TteMigy
Jtotfafwnanfc
EX&noiea swpftuy frfap J, f»*2
ilM
«aBV> msfljacrttate
b5„ icapt u flOJsrf b*few
a,>stW
••aawataae
Traatrourf ^UnaBnis ¦ cnnca/tbettoij/Smla
SaJMnsnanarptotteJam
fWaf, tffitesa sfBJ7rfan±» fflvisstf

Sa* anct««£-*i
-s/s/so-s/B/az
HaSooB) CepacJfy SxtatsJortM/nitniBrt T&cWrtvgy
Ae<}u£ema.Tta
SoWiAk «*=¦*! *fs* l>. r»2
i/iea
WAfa(hy(-^n®o-A^
Afl, «*cspfai rra»dfwto*
«w«?
*s;ajeWJMSra
TwatrfwH Slacc*in#» - spastfwj tschnalosy
St>* .hw^ivjj provteiws
uAi! stendatds i^viaati

Soffs^itebeS-
*sme*ie&2
AtociVM^CsipttcJ^ EdaoStejfWiAnanr Tfc^ttr^bgjp'
^ulwrait!
irlajfKJt ajrpi-Ba May ¦; ISjf
sy
!3Wp?!'lS.7M,7tJ
£Mfis)M Bogahw tiaffS, 1882
'flestftcSantoe0actlOfp^atSne>ad.	' ' * OStFT OO VtfT CITc Oh OUOTx -* - '
m"SBE AfHSED C=B?A?>f tx& lOVEfftFyAtL WfOSMAHCW - * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) {continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		 A-1 (»).T7
Wait* Code*-*
Type4-*'
Dates Restricted7
type of Restriction
Comments
U168
1,Naphthoquinone
All. except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1-87
1-Naphthyllamlne
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*,5/8/90-518192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U188
Napthyiamlne,2-
Nonwaatewatera
Wastowatera
8/8/90
8/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Final, unless standards revised
Final, unless standards revised

All
*6/8/69-5/8/90
Soft hammer firovlslons


Soil and debria
*518/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U169
Nitrobenzene
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration lave la
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U170
p-Nltrophenol
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*8/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*518/9*5/8/92.
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology .
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction in effect tor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
• * * SEE REVISEO 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		 A-1(a).78
Watte Code*-'
7
Datea Restricted7
Type of RaaMcUon
Commenta
U171
Nltropropane, 2-
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standarda - apeclfled technology
Soft hammer provMona
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
•6/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8. 1992
U172
N-nltroso-dLn-
butyiamlne
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•8/8/8*5/8/90
Treatment Standarda ¦ concentration lavela
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unlaaa standards revised

Sou and debria
•5/8/9*5/8/92
National Capacity Extenslon/Mlnlfnum Technology
Requlrementa
Extension expires May 6, 1992
U173
N-nlfroso-
dlethanolamlne
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requlrementa
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U174
N-nltroao-
dlethylamlne
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•618/89-5/8190
Treatment Standarda - concentration lavela
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extenalon/Mlnlmum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U178
N-Nltroso-N-
ethyiurea
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•6/8/89-5/8190
Treatment Standarda - specified technology
Soft hammer provlslona
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
•518/90- 5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requlrementa
Extension expires May 8, 1992
• Restriction In eflect lor period noted.	• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE •••
•"•SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • •
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).79
Waste Coda*"'	iyj»w	Date* Restricted7 Type ot Restriction	Comments
U177	All, except as noted below	818190
N-NHroso-N-
methylurea	*8/8/88-5/8190
Soil and debris	*5/8/00-5/0/82
U178	All, except as noted below	8/8/90
N-NUroso-N-
methylurethane	*8/8/89-5/8/90
Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8/92
U179	All, except as noted below	8/8190
N-Nltrosoplpert-dlne
*618/89-5/8190
Soil and debris	*5/8190-5/8192
U180	All. except as noted below	8/8/90
N-Nltrosopyrrol-
Idlne	*818/88-5/8/90
Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8/92
U181	A/I, except as noted below	8/8/90
5-NHro-o-toluldlne
Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8192
U182	All, except as noted below	8/8190
Paraldehyde
Soil and debris	*5/8190-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology	Final, unless standards revised
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension expires May 8, 1992
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Treatment Standards - specified technology	Final, unless standards revised
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension eiqilres May 8, 1992
Requirements
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Restriction In effect for period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).80
Watt* Coda*'
iyp#
,w
Data a Restricted7 Type of Raatrfctlon
Commonta
U183
Pentachloro-
benzene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/00	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U184
Pentachhroethane
All, except as noted below
SoU and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8190-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
'Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U185
Pentachloronltro-
benzene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debria
8/8/90	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U188
1,3-Pentadlena
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
•5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U187
Phenacetin
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
* Restriction In ellect lor period noted.
• * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(a).81
Wart* Code1-3
Type™
Dates Restricted7
Type ot Restriction
Comments
uiaa
Phenol
All, except aa noted below
818/90
*8/0/88-5/0/00
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debris
*5/0/00-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U189
Phosphorus sulfide
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*6/0/09-3/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Solt hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and tlebris
*5/0/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U190
Phthallc anhydride
Ml, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/09
*6/0/09-6/0/9/
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1991
U191
2-Plcollne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
0/0/90
*5/0/90-5/0/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U1B2
Pronamlde
All, except as ngted below
8/0/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
. National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
1,3-Propane sultone
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
*5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE " *
* * *SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDP RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE*
A-1(s)-82
Watt* Cod**-'
TVpo

Data a Restricted7 Type ot Restriction
Comment*
U194
1-Pmpanamlne
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/00-518/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U196
Pyridine
All, except aa noted below
Soli and debris
8/8190	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*6/8/89-5/8190	Soft hammer provisions
*518190-518192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
1/797
p-Benzoqulnona
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*518/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8.1992
U200
Reserpine
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer previsions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U201
Resorclnol
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U202
Saccharin &
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
			 A-1 (a). S3
Waste Coda**
T*paw
Dates Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U203
Sulrole
All, except aa notad balow
818/90
•8/8/89-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
•5/8/9*6/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U204
Selanloua acid
All
8/8/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Final, unless atandarda revised
U20S
Selenium disulfide
All
8/8/90
*6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless atandarda revised
U206
Streptozotocln
All, except aa notad below
8/0/90
*618/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - apeclHed technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless atandarda revised

Soil and debria
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U207
1,2,4,5-tetra-
chlorobenzene
All, except aa notad below
Soil and debria
8/8/90
•5/8190-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless atandarda revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
1/200
Terachloroethane,
1.1,1.2-
All, except aa noted below
8/8/90
•6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless atandarda revised

Soli and debria
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* • * SEE REVISED AO CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * «
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
		A-1(»).84
Watte Code*-'
Typ.<*4
Date a Restricted7
Type of Restriction
Comments
U209
Tetrachloro- ethane,
1.1.2,2-
Ml, except aa noted below
010190
*8/0/88-5/0/90
Treatment Standards • concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

SoU and debris
*5/0/00-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 0, 1002
U210
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
All, except aa noted below
010190
*0/0/00-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*510/90-510/92
National Capacity ExtenslonJMInlmum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 0, 1992
U211
Carbon
tetrachloride
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*0/0/08-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 0, 1992
U213
Tetrahydroturan
All, except aa noted below
0/0/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soli and debria
*5/0/90-5/0/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 0, 1992
U214
Thallium (1) acetate
chloride nitrate
All
0/0/90
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
1/2 J 5
Thallium (1)
carbonate
All
010190
*6/0/09-5/0/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
* Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF IDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).85
Waste Code**
type***
Datea Restricted7
type ot Restriction
Comments
U216
Thallium (1) chloride
All
818/90
*918189-518190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammar provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U217
Thallium 0) nitrate
All
818190
•618189-518/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised
U218
Thloacetamlda
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•6/8/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U21B
Thiourea
All, except as noted below
8/0/90
•6/8/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8192
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 6, 1992
U220
Toluene
All, except as noted below
8/8/90
•818/88-5/8190
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•5/8/90-5/8/92
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires May 8,1992
U221
Toluenedlamlne
All, except aa noted below
6/6/89
•6/6/68 - 6/8/89
Treatment Standards - specific technology
Soft hammer provisions
Final, unless standards revised

Soil and debris
•6/8/89-6/8/91
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Extension expires June 8, 1991
Restriction In effect tor period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (») (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE*
A-1(a).86
Waste Code*'	iyp«w	Dates Restricted7 Type of Restriction	Commenta
U222
o-Toluldlne
hydrochloride
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*518/90-518192	Notional Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U223
Toluene
dllaocyanata
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
6/8/89	Treatment Standards - specific technology
*8/8/88 • 6/8/80 Soft hammer provisions
*6/8/89-6/8/91	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8,1991
U225
Bromotorm
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*518/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U226
Methylchloroform
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90
*818/88-5/8/90
*518/90-518/92
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U227
Trlchloroethane,
1.1,2-
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8190-5/8/92 . National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U228
Trichloroettrylene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*8/8188-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect for period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(a).87
Watte Coda**
jyp*
,4M
Ditta Restricted7 Type of Restriction
Comments
U234
Sym-Trinttro-
benzene
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
819190
*619190-519192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expiree May 8, 1992
U23S
Trie (2,3-
Dlbromopropyf)
phosphate
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debrla
618/89
*6/0/89-5/8/90
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires June 8, 1891
U238
Trypan blue
All, except as noted below
Soil and debrla
8/8190
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - apecWed technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U237
Uracil mustard
All, except aa noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*818/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U238
Ethyl carbamate
Ail, except aa noted below
Soil end debris
8/8/90
*8/8/88-5/8/90
*5/8/90-5/8192
Treatment Standards - specified technology
Soft hammer provisions
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U239
Xylene
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*818/89-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
* Restriction In effect lor period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 • DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ***
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
AZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
	 A-1 (a). 88
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
Watt* Code*"'	lyp#***	Datee Restricted7 Type of Restriction	Comment*
U240
2,4-D salts £ eaten
AH, except as noted below
Soil and debris
818100
*518190-510192
Treatment Standards - concentration levels
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U249
Hexachloropropene
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
818/90	Treatment Standards • concentration levels
*518190-518192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
U244
Thlrain
All. except as noted below
Soil and debris
818190	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*818/89-518190	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8190-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U248
Cyanogen bromide
All, except as noted below
Soli and debris
818/90
*5/8/90-5/8/92
Treatment Standards - specified technology
National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U247
Methoxychlor
All, except as noted below
Soil end dobria
818/90	Treatment Standards - concentration levels
*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8, 1992
U248
Warfarin, <0.3
percent
All, except as noted below
Soil and debris
8/8/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology
*8/8/88-5/8/90	Soft hammer provisions
*5/8/90-5/8192	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology
Requirements
Final, unless standards revised
Extension expires May 8,1992
Restriction In effect lor period noted.
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a). 8 9
WaateCode*"'	jyp«w	Datoa Restricted7 Type of Restriction	Comments
U249	All, except ea noted below	818/90	Treatment Standards - specified technology	Final, unless standards revised
Zinc phosphide,
<10 percent	*8/8/88-5/8190	Soft hammer provisions
Soil and debris	*5/8/90-5/8/92	National Capacity Extension/Minimum Technology Extension expires May 8,1992
Requframents
Restriction In effect for period noted.
** * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * 6 *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (a) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE'
A-1(a).00
ENDNOTES
1.	This appendix does not address LDR restrictions tor deepwell-lnlected wastes or mixed radioactive wastes. For mom Information on deepwelt-ln/ected wastes, sea 40 CFR
140; for more Information on mixed radioactive wastes, see 40 CFR 268.
2.	Appendices A-2 (F001-F005, F020-F023, and F026-F02B), A-4 (First, Second, and Third Third wastes), and AS (Multi-Source Laachata) provide complete waste code
descriptions and, where appropriate, complete explanation of treatment standards and BDATs.
3.	If a site contains a RCRA listed or characteristic hazardous waste, the site manager should also determine whether the waste Is a California list waste. The restrictions for
California list wastes are summarized In Appendix A-1(b).
4.	EPA considers "wastewaters' to be wastes containing less than one percent total organic carbon (TOC) and less than one percent total filterable solids. All other
substances are 'nonwastewaters.'
5.	Soil and debris wastes are subject to restrictions listed under the category 'nonwastewaters,' except where noted otherwise.
6.	Inorganic solid debris applies only to D004 through D011 wastes. For a detailed definition of Ms treatability group, sea 40 CFR 268.
7.	All Third Third wastes were granted a ttuee-month national capacity variance; therefore, treatment standards for these wastes, unless noted otherwise, will be effective as of
August 8, 1000. During the period of May 8, 1000 and August 8, 1000, wastes must be disposed of In a unit that meets the RCRA minimum technology requirements.
8.	This waste was newly listed on October 23, 1985. EPA Is required to set LDR treatment standards for these wastes wHhln 8 months of the data of listing, but no hammer
provisions apply.
0. This waste was newly listed on February 13, 1086. EPA Is required to set LDR treatment standards for these wastes within 8 months of the date of listing, but no hammer
provisions apply.
10. This waste was newly listed on October 24, 1088. EPA Is required to set LDR treatment standards for these wastes within 8 months of the data of listing, but no hammer
provisions apply.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A1 (b)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA CALIFORNIA UST WASTES1
A-I(b). 1
Waste Coda*	iyp»v	Datea Restricted type of Restriction	Comment*
California List	Liquid RCRA hazardous	718/87	Nona - hard hammer restrictions apply
wastes	waste containing tree
Cyanides In concentrations
greater than 1000 mgll
Liquid RCRA hazardous	718187	None - hard hammer restrictions apply
waste containing metals In
concentrations greater than:
500 mgll for arsenic,
100 mgll for lead,
500 mgll for chromium VI,
500 mgll tor lead,
20 mgll for mercury,
134 mgll for nickel,
100 mgll for selenium, and
130 mgll for thallium
Liquid RCRA hazardous	718187	None - Codified prohibition levels
waste that Is a corrosive
waste with a pH less than or
equal to 2.0
Liquid RCRA hazardous	718)87	Treatment standard - specified technology
waste containing PCBa In
concentrations greater than
or equal to 50 ppm
RCRA hazardous waste
containing halooenated
organic compounds IHOCs)*
that are:
Dilute wastewaters greater	718187	Codified prohibition levels
than or equal to 1000 mgll
but less than 10,000 mgll
Liquid hazardous wastes and 818/88	. Treatment standard - specified technology
non-liquids greater than or
equal to 1000 mglkg
* Restriction In etlect lor period noted.
* * * DRAFT 6/00 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" * SEE REVISED 40 CFH PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-1 (b) (continued)
TYPE OF LDR RESTRICTION IN EFFECT FOR EACH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE1
A-1(b).2
IViift Cod**	Typo*"4	Dates Restricted typa of Restriction	Comments
RCRA/CERCLA soli and	1118198 - 1118/90 National capacity extension In effect until
debris greater than or equal	November 8, 1090
tolOOOmglkg	11/8/90
Final - Codified prohibition levels
RCRA hazardous waste
containing haloaenated
organic compounds IHOCs)*
that are:
Non-RCRAJCERCLA soil and 7/8/87 - 7/8/89	Minimum Technology Requirements	National capacity extension In effect
debris greater than or equal	until July 8, 1889
to 1000 mg/kg
7/8/89	Treatment standard - specified technology
1.	Under the LDRs, the California list prohibitions may continue to apply In circumstances when: (1) Liquid hazardous wastes contain over 50 ppm PCBs, where the PCBs are not
regulated by the treatment standards; (2) HOC-contalnlng wastes are Identified as hazardous by a characteristic property that does not Involve HOCs, such as an Ignltable
waste that also contains greater than 1,000 ppm HOCs; (3) Liquid hazardous wastes contain a total concentration of more than 134 mg/l of nickel and/or 130 mg/l of thallium
(because these two constituents are not regulated under the characteristic of toxicity); and (4) Wastes granted a two-year national capacity variance are also California Ust
wastes, until the treatment standards become effective.
2.	Appendix A-2 provides complete waste code descriptions, and where appropriate, complete explanation of treatment standards and BDATa.
3.	EPA considers "wastewaters' to be wastes containing less than one percent total organic carbon (TOC) and less than one percent total filterable solids.
4.	Soil and debris wastes are subject to restrictions listed under the category 'nonwastawaters,' except where noted otherwise.
6. See Appendix III to 40CFR 288 for a list of HOCs used to calculate whether a waste contains greater than 1,000 mg/kg of HOCs.
" Restriction In effect for period noted.	* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
<
-------
APPENDICES A-2 AND A-3
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES
FOR SOLVENT- AND DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTES AND
CALIFORNIA LIST WASTES
JUNE 1990
* * DRAFT-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * *
-------
A MA-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVEni- AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
ArZ1
Mfesfe
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCiP (mgll)1
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology
Effective Data
The following spent halogenated solvents used
Nonwastewaters3

Incineration for all constituents
November 8,1986, for all
In degreaslng: tetrachloroethytena.
Acetone
0.59

except
trichbroethylene, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-
*Benzene
3.7 (Total)


trlchloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, and
n-Butyl Alcohol
6.0

August 8,1090, lor those
chlorinated fluorocarbons; all spent solvent
Carbon Disulfide
4.81

noted with a •;
mixtures/blends used In degreaslng containing,
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.96


before use, a total of fen percent or more (by
Chlorobenzene
0.05

November 8,1988. for all
volume) ot one or more of the above
Cresols S Cresyllc Ackl
0.75

others, Including:
halogenated solvents or those solvents listed In
Cychhexanone
0.75

F002, F004, and FOOS; and still bottoms from
1,2-DkMombenzene
0.125

- Small quantity generators;
the recovery of these spent solvents and spent
Ethyl Acetate
0.75

• CERCLA/RCRA corrective
solvent mixtures.
Ethyl Benzene
0.053

action fnon-soil and debrisI:

Ethyl Ether
0.75

and

laobutanol
5.0

- Initial generator'e solvent-

Methanol
0.75

water mixtures, solvent-

Methylene Chloride
0.96

containing sludges and

Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.75

solids, and non CERCLAJ

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
0.33

RCRA corrective action soils

Nitrobenzene
0.125

with less than 1 Dement total

Pyridine
0.33

solvent constituents:

Tetrachloroathyiane
0.05



Toluene
0.33

and

1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
0.41



*1,1,2-Trichloroethane
7.6 (Total)

November 8,1990, for aO soil

1,1.2,-Trichloro-


and debris from CERCLAJ

1,2,2-trifluoroethane
0.96

RCRA corrective actions.

Trtchloroethyieno
0.091



Trlchlorofluoromethane
0.96



Xylene
0.15



"2-Ethoxyethanol
Treatment technology -
Incineration



*2-Nltropropana
Treatment technology -
Incineration


• •• DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* * * SEE REVISED AO CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT' AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.2
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCLP (rngll)1
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology*
Effective Date
F0O1
(cont)
Acetone
0.05
Steam stripping
'Benzene
0.07 (Total)
Biological treatment, steam stripping, carbon


adsorption, A liquid extraction
n-Butyl Alcohol
5.0
Steam stripping
Carbon Dlsutltde
1.05
Steam stripping
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.05
Biological treatment
Chlorobanzene
0.15
Biological treatment ft activated carbon
Cresols & Cresytlc Acid
2.82
Activated carbon
Cyclohexanone
0.125
Steam stripping
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.65
Biological treatment & activated carbon
Ethyl Acetate
0.05
Steam stripping
Ethyl Benzene
0.05
Biological treatment
Ethyl Ether
0.05
Steam stripping
Isobutanol
5.0
Steam shipping
Methanol
0.25
Steam stripping
Methylene Chloride
0.20
Biological treatment
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
0.05
Steam stripping
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
0.05
Steam stripping
Nitrobenzene
0.66
Steam stripping A activated carbon
Pyridine
1.12
Biological treatment 6 activated carbon
Tetrachloroethylene
0.079
Biological treatment
Toluene
1.12
Biological treatment & activated carbon
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.05
Steam stripping
*1,1,2-Trtchloroethane
0.030 (Total)
Incineration
1,1,2,-Trichloro-

1,2,2triHuoroethane
1.05
Steam stripping
Trichloroethylene
0.062
Biological treatment & activated carbon
Trlchlorofluoromethane
0.05
Biological treatment
Xylene
0.05
Activated carbon
'2-Ethoxyethanol
Treatment technology -


Incineration or


blodegradatlon

*2-Nitropropane
Treatment technology •


Incineration; (chemical


oxidation or wet-air


oxidation) followed by


carbon adsorption

November 8,1988, for all
except
August 8, 1990, for those
noted with a *;
November 8,1988, for all
others, Including:
-	Small quantify generators;
-	CERCLAJRCRA corrective
action (non-soil and debris):
and
-	Initial generator's solvent-
water mixtures, solvent-
containing sludges and
solids, and non CERCLA/
RCRA corrective action soUa
with less than 1 percent total
solvent constituents:
and
November 8, 1090. for all soil
and debris from CERCLA/
RCRA corrective actions.
DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
° • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART "O VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •
-------
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- aND DIOXM-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.3
Traatmant
Standards
MM)	TCLP (mg/1)1	Best Demonstrated
Code	Description	Constituent	(unless otherwise noted)	Treatment Technology*	Effective Data
F002 The following spent haiogenated solvents:	For IndMdual constituents, see treatment standards	See effective dates tor F001.
tetrachioroethytene, methylene chloride,	for F001 wastes above,
trichloroethytene, 1,1,1-trichloroethano,
chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-bichbro-l ,2,2-
trlfluoroethane, orthodlchlorobenzene,
trlchlorofluoromethane, and 1,1£-
trlchlofoethane; all spent solvent mbcture/bJonda
containing, before use, a total of ten percent or
more (by volume) of one or more otthe above
haiogenated solvents or those listed In F001,
F004, orFOOS; and still bottoms from the
recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
F003 The following spent non-halogenated solvents:
xylene, acetone, ethyl acetate, ethyl benzene,
ethyl ether, methyl Isobutyl ketone, n-butyl
alcohol, cydohexanone, and methanol; all
spent solvent mbdureslblends containing,
before use, only the above spent non-
halogenated solvents; and all spent solvent
mbdureslblends containing, before use, one or
mom of the above non-halogenated solvents,
and, a total of ten percent or mora (by volume)
of one or more of those solvents listed In F001,
F002, F004, and FOOS; and still bottoms from
the recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
For IndMdual constituents, see treatment standards
for F001 wastes above.
See effective dates for F001.
F004 The following spent non-halogenated solvents:
cresols and cresyllc acid, and nitrobenzene; all
spent solvent mixtures/blends containing,
before use, a total of ten percent or more (by
Volume) of one or more of the above non-
halogenated solvents or those solvents listed In
F001, F002, and F005; and still bottoms from
the recovery of these spent solvents and spent
solvent mixtures.
For Individual constituents, see treatment standards
for FOOt wastes above.
See effective dates for F001.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX Ar2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.4
Treatment
Standards
TCLP (mgfl)*	Bast Demonstrated
Coda	Description	Constituent	(unlesa otherwise noted)	Treatment Technology	Effective Data
F005 The following spent non-haJogenated solvents:	For Individual constituents, see treatment standards	See effective dates for F001.
toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, carbon disulfide,	for F001 wastes above.
Isobutanol, pyridine, benzene. 2-ethoxyethanol,
and 2-nltropropane; all spent solvent
mixtures/blends containing, before use, a total
at ten percent or more (by volume) ol one or
more of the above non-halogenated solvents or
those solvents Usted In F001, F002, or F004;
and atiO bottoms from the recovery ot these
spent solvents and spent solvent mixtures.
Wastes (excepit wastewater and spent carbon
Hexachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb
89.8909% DRE - Incineration for all constituents November 8, 1888, lor
from hydrogen chloride purification) from the
dioxlns

constituents In F020 wastes
production or manufacturing use (as a reactant.


except
chemical Intermediate, or component In a
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans
1
V

formulating process ) at tri- or


November 8, 1990, for F020
tetrachlorophenol, or of intermediates used to
Pentachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb
constituents In soli and
produce their pesticide derivatives. (This listing
dloxlns

debris from CERCtA/RCRA
does not Include wastes from the production ol


corrective actions.
hexachlorophene from highly purified 2,4,5-
Pentachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb .

trichlorophenol.
furans


Basis tor Listing: Tetra- and
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb

pentachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlns; tetra- and
dloxlns


pentachlorodtoerizoturana; tri- and tetra-



chiorophenols and their chlorophenoxy
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb

derivative acids, esters, ethers, amine, and
furans


other salts.




2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


2,4,6-Trlchlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


Pentachlorophenol
< 0.01 ppm

* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE " * *
° * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 25r ^RIFYALL INFORMATION * * •
-------

APF^^^m- A-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVE^KnD DIOXJN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.5
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCLP (mg/1)1
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology*
Effective Date
F021 Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
from hydrogen chloride purification) from the
pmduction or manufacturing use (as a reactant,
chemical Intermediate, or component In a
formulating process) of pentachfomphenol, or
of Intermediates used to produce its derivatives.
Basis for Ustlng: Penta- and
haxachlomdtbenzo-p-dloxlns; penta- end
hexachlorodlbenzofurans; pentachlorophenol
and Its derivatives.
Hexachlorodlbanzo-p- < 1 ppb
dtoxins
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans < 1 ppb
Pentachlorodibenzo-p- < 1 ppb
dtoxins
Pentachlorodibenzofumns < 1 ppb
< 1 ppb
Tetrachktrodlbemo-p-
dloxlns
Tetrachlorodibenzo-
furans
2.4.5-Trlchlorophenol
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol
2,3,4,6- Tetrachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
<	1 ppb
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.01 ppm
99.9999% DRE - Incineration for aO constituents November 8, 1088, for
constituents In F021 wastes
except
November 8,1990, for F021
constituents bi soil and
debris from CERCLAJRCRA
corrective actions.
* * * DRAFT 6190 -DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
• • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •'*
-------
APPENDIX A-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.6
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCLP (mgll)1
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology
Effective Date
Vfastoa (except wastewater and spent carbon
Hexachlorodib enzo-p-
< 1 ppb
99.090
9% ORE - Incineration for all constituents November 8,1888, lor
bom hydrogen chloride purification) from the
dloxlns


constituents In F022 wastes
manufacturing mo (as a reactant, chemical



except
Intermediate, or component In a formulating
Haxachlorodiboruofurana
1
V


process) of tetm-, penta-, or



November 8,1090, for F022
hexachlorobenzenes under alkaline conditions.
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
< 1 ppb

constituents In soil and

dloxlns


debris from CERCLA/RCRA
Bash tor Listing: Tetm-, penta-, ami



corrective actions.
hexachlorodlberuo-p-dloxtns, tetra-, penta-, and
Pentachforodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb


hexachlorodibenzohirans.
furana




Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb



dloxlns




Tetrachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb



furans




2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm



2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm



2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorvphenol
< 0.05 ppm



Pentachlorophanoi
< 0.01 ppm


•** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE *
* • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 IB&ERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPL A-i
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- AND DIOXJN-CONTAININO WASTES
Ari.7
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCLP(mgl1)'
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology^
Effective Date
Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
Hexachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb
89.9999% DRE - Incineration for all constituents Novembers, 1988, for
front hydrogen chloride purification) from the
dloxins

constituents In F023 wastes
production of materials on equipment


except
previously used for the production or
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans
%
V

manufacturing use (as sieactent, chemical


November 8,1990, for F023
Intermediate, or component In a formulating
Pentachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb
constituents In soO and
process) of trt- and tetrachlorophenola. (This
dloxlns

debris from CERCLAJRCRA
listing does not Include wastes from equipment


corrective actions.
used only for the production or use of
Pentachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb

hexachktrophene from highly purified 2,4,5-
furans


trichlorophenol.)




Tetrachiorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb

Basis tor Listing: Tetra- and
dloxfns


pentachlomdlbenzo-p-dkudns; tetra- and



pentachlorodlbenzofurans; trt- and tetra-
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb

chlorophenols and their chlorophenoxy
furans


derivative adds, esters, ethers, amine, and



other salts.
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


2,4,6-Trfchlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


Pentachloropheno!
< 0.01 ppm

* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* • • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A- 2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.8
Treatment
Standards
Waste	TCLP (mg/1)1	Beat Demonstrated
Code	Description	Constituent	(unless otherwise noted)	Treatment Technology3	Effective Date
F028 Wastes (except wastewater and spent carbon
fronj hydrogen chloride purification) from the ¦
production of materials on equipment
previously used for the manufacturing use (as a
reactant, chemical Intermediate, or component
In a formulating process) of tetra-, penta-, or
hexachlorobenzeno under alkaline conditions.
Basis for Listing: Tetra-, penta-, and
hexachkvodlbenzo-p-dloxlna, tetra-, penta-, and
hexachkuodlbenzofurans.
Hexachlorodlbenzo-p- < 1 ppb
dlcudns
99.9909% DRE - Incineration for all constituents
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans < 1 ppb
<1PPb
Pentachlorodlbenzo-p-
dlcodna
Pentachlorodibenzo-
furans
Tetrachtorodlbenzo-p-
dkadns
Tetrachforodtbemo-
furans
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,3,4,8-Tetrachlorophenol
Pantachlorophenol
<	1 ppb
<	1 ppb
<	1 ppb
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<0.01 ppm
November 8, 1989, for
constituents In F026 wastes
except
November 8, 1990, for F026
constituents In soli and
debris torn CERCLA/RCRA
corrective actions.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
• • • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART ' T VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • "
-------
APh A-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVE*,- AND DIOXIN-CONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.9
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment
Standards
TCLP (mg/1)1
(unless otherwise noted)
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology
Effective Date
Discarded unused formulations containing tri-.
Hexachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb
99.9999% DRE - Incineration tor off constituents Novembers, 1988, for
te(ra-, or pantachlorophenol or discarded
dkudns

constituents In F027 wastes
unused formulation containing compounds


except
derived from these chlorophenols. (This listing
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans
1
V

doaa not Include formulations containing


November 8, 1990, for F027
hexachtomphene synthesized from prepurffled
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
< I ppb
constituents In soil and
2,4,5-trlchlbrophenol as the sola component)
dloxlns

debris from CERCLAJRCRA



corrective actions.
Basis for Using: Tetra-, penta-, and
PentacNorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb

haxachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlns, tetra-, penta-, and
furans


hexachlorodlbenzofurans; tri-, tetra-, and



pentachlorophenols and their chlorophanoxy
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-
< 1 ppb

derivative acids, esters, ethers, amine, and
dloxlns


other salts.




Tetrachlorodlbenzo-
< 1 ppb


furans



2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


2,4,6- Trlchlorophenol
< 0.0$ ppm


2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
< 0.05 ppm


Pentachlorophenol
< 0.01 ppm

* • * DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE « * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •**
-------
APPENDIX A-2
TREATMENT STANDARDS SOLVENT- AND DIOXINCONTAININQ WASTES
A-2.10
Treatment
Standards
Waste	TCLP (mg/1)1	Best Demonstrated
Code	Description	Constituent	(unless otherwise noted)	Treatment Technology	Effective Date
F028 Residues resulting from the Incineration or
thermal treatment of soil contaminated with EPA
Hazardous Mteste Nos. F020, F021, F022, F023,
F026, and F027.
Basis for Listing: Tetra-, penta-, and
hexachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlna; tatra-, penta-, and
hexBchhrodlbenzofurans; til-, tetra-, and
pentachlorophenoi and their chlorophenoxy
derivative aclda, esters, ethers, amine, and
other salts.
HexacUorodlbemo-p- < 1 ppb
dloxins
Haxaohiorodlbenzofurans < 1 ppb
< 1 PPb
Pentachlorodlbemo-p-
dloxlns
Pentachlorodlbenzo-
furans
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-
dloxins
Tetmchlorodlbenzo-
iurans
2.4.5-Trichlorophenol
2.4.6-Trlchlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenoi
<	1 ppb
<	1 ppb
<	1 ppb
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.05 ppm
<	0.01 ppm
99.9990% Dft£ - Incineration for ail constituents November 8, 1988, for
constituents In F028 wastes
except
November 8,1990, for F028
constituents In soil and
debris from CERCLA/RCRA
corrective actions.
' Concentration In TCLP extract of the waste treatment residues based on practical detection limit
9 Other treatment methods may be used II the wastes meet the treatment standard concentration levels.
* Wastewaters are defined as solvent water mixtures containing one percent or less total organic carbon.
* • * DRAFT 6/90 -DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * "
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PAP TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •
-------
PB^H-9
ZTIV^uATES
APPEl\	
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTJVETRTES FOR CALIFORNIA UST WASTES'
A-3.1
Description
Prohibition
Constituent	Level
Treatment
Standard
Test
Method
Best Demonstrated
Treatment Technology
Effective Data
Liquid hazardous wastes, Including tree liquids
i •dated with solid or sludge, containing free
cyanides (cyanides amenable to chiortnation by
test method 9010 In SW-848 Is recommended) at
concentrations greater than or equal to 1,000
mgll ¦
Liquid hazardous wastes, Including free liquids
dated with any solid 6r sludge, containing
the following metals (or elements) or compounds
of these metals (or elements) at concentrations
greater than or equal to the prohibition levels
Liquid (aqueous) hazardous wastes having a pH
than or equal to 2.0
Dilute halogenated organic compounds (HOC)
wastewaters, defined as HOC-waste mixtures that
ere primarily water and that contain greater than
or equal to 1,000 mgll but less than 10,000 mgll
Other liquid hazardous wastes containing HOCs
In total concentration greater than or equal to
1,000 mg
Non-liquid hazardous wastes containing HOCs In
total concentrations greater than or equal to
1,000 mglkg
Soil and debris HOCs not from CERCLAJRCRA
corrective actions
1,000 mgll
NA
PFLT0
NA
July 8, 1987
Arsenic3
Cadmium3
Chromium W9
Lead3
Mercurf
NIckeT
Selenium3
Thalltunt'
500 mgll
100 mgll
600 mgll
500 mgll
20 mgll
134 mgll
100 mgll
130 mgll
pH<2.0
1,000 mgll
NA
NA
NA
1,000 mgll	99.99% DRE
> 1,000 mglkg 99.99% DRE
> 1,000 mglkg 99.99% DRE
PFLT3
NA
PFLT*
Test Method 8.2
In SW-848
applied to
total waste
PFLT*
TWA3
PFLT*
TWA5
PFLT4
TWA5
NA
PFLT4
TWA5
NA
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
July8,1987
July 8.1987
July 8,1987
Novembers, 1988
November 8,1988
July8, 1989
• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX AS
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR CALIFORNIA UST WASTES1
A3.2
Description
Constituent
Prohibition
Level
Treatment
Standard
Test
Method
Bast Demonstrated
Treatment Technology
Effective Date
Sott and debris HOCa trow CERCLAIRCRA
corrective actions
I
Uquld hazardous waste containing
pofychtorlnated blphenyia (PCBs) at
concentrations greater than or equal to 50 ppm
and lesa than 500 ppm
Uquld hazardous wastes containing PCBs greater
than or equal to 500 ppm
>1,000 mglkg 99.03% DRE
50 ppm PCBs 99.0909* DRE
50 ppm PCBs 00.0909% DRE
PFLT*
TWA9
PFLT*
TWA9
PFLT1
TWA9
Incineration
Incineration (In
accordance with 40
CFR 761.70) or
burning In a high
efficiency boiler (In
accordance with 40
CFR 761.60)
Incineration (In
accordance with 40
CFR 761.70)
November 8, 1090
July 8. 1087
July 8.1087
' Under the LDRa, California list prohibitions may continue to apply In circumstances when: (1) liquid hazardous wastes contain over 50 ppm PCBs, where the PCBs am not regulated by the treatment
standards; (2) HOC-contalnlng wastes are Identified as hazardous by a characteristic property that does not Involve HOCa, such as an Ignltable waste that also contains greater than 1,000 ppm HOCa;
(3) liquid hazardous wastes contain a total concentration of mote titan 134 mgll of nickel andtor 130 mgfl of thallium (because these two constituents are not regulated under the characteristic of
toxicity); and (4) wastes granted a two-year national capacity variance are also California list wastes, until the treatment standards become effective.
a Concentration level must be determined either by the filtrate from the paint titter free Uquld test (PFLT) or by knowledge of the waste.
a And/or compounds.
4 A paint Wter free liquid test (PFLT) must be used to determine If the waste contains free liquids.
9 A total waste analysis Is performed to determine V the concentration of HOCs Is above the prohibition level.
• * » DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------

-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES
FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES
JUNE 1990
* * DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * *
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.1
Was/•
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/l)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by *)
D001 Ignltable wastes.
Nonwastewalers
Ignltable Compressed Oases subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Ignltable Reectlves subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Oxidizers
Treatment technology - deactivation
Ignltable Liquids High TOC (t 10% TOC)
Treatment technology - Incineration; fuel substitution; or
recovery treatment
Ignltiable Liquids low TOC (> 1% TOC but < 10% TOC)
Treatment technology - deactivation
August 8, 1990
Deactivation.
Deactivation.3
Deactivation.9
Incineration; luel substitution; or recovery
treatment.
Deactivation.3
* * « DRAFT 6190 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEZ'FY ALL INFORMATION * * °
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.2
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis tor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by**)
noted by *)
0001 (continued)	Wastewaters	August 8, 1990
Ignltable Compressed Oases subcategory	Deactivation.3
Treatment technology - deactivation
Ignltable Reacthres subcategory	Deactivation.3
Treatment technology - deactivation
Oxidizers	Deactivation.3
Treatment technology - deactivation
Ignltable Liquids subcategory (<1% TOC, < 1%TSS)	Deactivation3
Treatment technology - deactivation
* • • DRAFT 6/90 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A 4.3
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample ' Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	EHacthre Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by ")
D002
Corrosive wastes.
Nonwastewaters
August 8, 1990
Alkaline subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Acid subcategory
Treatment technology • deactivation
Other Corrosives subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Wastewaters
Alkaline subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Acid subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Other Corrosives subcategory
Treatment technology ¦ deactivation
Deactivation.
Deactivation.3
Deactivation.3
Deactivation3
Deactivation.
Deactivation.'
August 8, 1990
* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEP'- Y ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.4
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by *)
0003
Reactive wastes.
Nonwastewaters
Reactive Cyanides subcategory
Cyanides (Total)	590
Cyanides (Amenable) 30
Augusts, 1090
NA
NA
Reactive Sulfides subcategory
Treatment technology - Deactivation
Explosives subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Water Reactlves and Other ReacOves subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Alkaline chlorinatlon.
Deactivation.3
Deactivation.
Deactivation.
* • • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.5
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgH)	As Basis for Standards
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by"}
noted by *)
0003 (continued)
Wastewaters
D004
Arsenic.
Reactive Cyanides subcategory
Cyanides (Total)	Reserved	NA
Cyanides (Amenable) 0.086	NA
Alkaline chlorirmtlonAugust 8, 1090
Reactive Sulfides subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Explosives subcategory
Treatment technology - deactivation
Water Reactlves and Other Reactives subcategory
Treatment technology ¦ deactivation
Deactivation?
Deactivation.J
Deactivation.3
Nonwastewatara
Arsenic
Wastewaters
NA
5.0*
Vitrification.
May8, 1992
August 8, 1990
Arsenic
5.0
NA
Chemical precipitation.
' • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" " • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VE^'FY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.6
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total fmglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by
noted by ")
DOOS Barium.
Nonwastewaters
Barium
Wastewater»
Barium
NA
100
100
NA
Chemical precipitation or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1900
August 8. 1990
DOOS Cadmium.
Nonwastewaters
Cadmium	NA	1.0
Cadmium Batteries
Treatment technology - thermal recovery
Wastewaters
Cadmium	1.0	MA
Stabilization.
Thermal recovery.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
Augusta, 1990
D007 Chromium.
Nonwastewaters
Chromium (Total)	NA
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)	5.0
August 8, 1990
5.0
NA
Chromium reduction followed by stabilization.
August 8, 1990
Chromium reduction followed by precipitation and
dewatering.
* * " DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERtF* ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND. AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.7
tVasfa
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by-)
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
Dooa
Lead.
0009 Mercury.
Nonwastewaters
Lead	NAS.O'
Lead Acid Batteries subcategory
Treatment technology - thermal recovery
Wastewaters
Lead	6.0NA
Stabilization.
Thermal recovery.
Chemical reduction lollowed by chemical
precipitation.
Nonwastewaters
High Mercury subcategory
(t 260 mglkg total mercury}
Mercury and organlcs
Treatment technology - Incineration ol mercury and
organlcs; or roasting or retorting
Inorganics (Including Incinerator residues)
Treatment technology ¦ roasting or retorting
Low Mercury subcategory
(< 260 mglkg total mercury)
Incineration; or roasting or retorting.
Roasting or retorting.
August 6, 1990
May 8, 1992 (extension lor
materials stored prior to
secondary smelting)
August 8, 1990
MayS, 1992
Mercury
NA
0.020
Acid leaching, stabilization, or Incineration.
* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* " * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.8
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Datea
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by ')
D009 (continued)
Wastewaters
Mercury
August 8, 1000
0.20
NA
Chemical oxidation! reduction followed by
chemical precipitation.
0010 Selenium.
Nonwastewaters
Selenium
Wastewaters
Selenium
NA
1.0
5.7
NA
Stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1900
August 8, 1090
D011 Silver.
D012 Endrln.
Nonwastewaters .
Silver
Wastewaters
Silver
NA
5.0
5.0
NA
Stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
Nonwastewaters
Endrln	0.13	NA	Incineration.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or blodegradatlon	Incineration or blodegradation.
Augusts, 1900
August 8. 1990
August 8. 1090
Augusts. 1990
* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO.NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEPfFv ALL INFORMATION » » *
-------
APPENDIX A~4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.9
Waste
Coda
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg	TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date
D013 Lindane.
D014 Methoxychlor.
D015 Toxaphono.
D016 2.4D.
Nonwastawatera
Lindane
Wastewaters
0.066
NA
Incineration.
Treatment technolgoy - Incineration or carbon adsorption Incineration or carbon absorption.
Nonwastawatera
Methoxychlor	0.10	NA	Incineration.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or wet-air oxidation	Incineration or wet-air oxidation.
Nonwastewaters
Toxaphene	1.3	NA	Incineration.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or blodegradatlon	Incineration or blodegradatlon.
Nonwastewaters
2.4-D
Wastewaters
10
NA
Incineration.
Treatment technology - incineration or blodegradatlon or Incineration or blodegradatlon or chemical
chemical oxidation	oxidation.
August 8, 1990
Augusts, 1990
August 0, 1990
Augusts, 1990
Augusts, 1990
Augusts, 1990
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" • 'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 266 TO VEPTf AUL INFORMATION * " •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.10
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Orab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Eltectlve Date2
D017
2,4,5- TP.
Nanwastewaters
2,4,5-TP	7.9	NA	Incineration.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or chemical oxidation Incineration or chemical oxidation.
Augusts, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * °
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.11
Treatment Standards
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
FOOt- For treatment standards for F001-F005, see
FOOS Appendix A-2, Solvents and Dloxlns
F009 Wastewater treatment sludges from	Nonwastewaters
electroplating operations except from the
following processes: (1) sulfuric acid anodizing	Cyanide (Total)	590
of aluminum; (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3)	Cyanide
line plating (segregated basis) on carbon	(Amenable)	30
steel; (4) aluminum or zlnc-alumlnum plating on	Cadmium (Total)	NA
carbon steel; (5) cleaning/stripping associated	Chromium (Total)	NA
with tin, line, and aluminum plating on carbon	Lead	NA
steel; and (6) chemical etching and milling of	Nickel	NA
aluminum.	Silver	NA
Alkaline chiorlnatlon for amenable and total
cyanides; stabilization of metals.
NA
NA
0.068
5.2
.51
.32
.072
August 8, 1988; Standard for
cyanide effective July 8, 1689
Wastewaters
Cyanides (Total)	1.2
Cyanides (Amenable)	0.88
Cadmium (Total)	1.8
Chromium (Total)	0.32
Lead	0.040
Nickel	0.44
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Alkaline chiorlnatlon tor amenable and total
cyanides; chromium reduction followed by
chemical precipitation for metals.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEP'FY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.12
Waqta
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
FOOT Spent cyanide plating solutions Irom
electroplating operations.
Nonwastewalers


Alkaline chlorlnatlon for amenable and total



cyanides; precipitation, settling, filtration and
Cyanides (ToUU)
590
NA
stabilization of metals.
Cyanides



(Amenable)
30
NA

Cadmium
NA
0.068

Chromium (Total)
NA
5.2

Lead
NA
0.51

Nickel
NA
0.32

Silver
NA
0.072

Wastewaters


Alkaline chlorlnatlon tor amenable and total



cyanides; precipitation, settling, nitration and
Cyanides (Total)
1.9
NA
sludge dewaterlng for metals.
Cyanides



(Amenable)
0.10
NA

Chromium (Total)
0.32
NA

Lead
0.04
NA

Nickel
0.44
NA

July 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
July 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1888)
• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * " SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.13
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any'
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards	Effective Date2
F008 Plating bath sludges from bottom of
plating bath from electroplating
operations where cyanides are
used In the process.
Nonwastewaters
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides
(Amenable)
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
590
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.066
5.2
0.51
0.32
0.072
Alkaline chlorlnatlon for amenable and
total cyanides; precipitation, settling
filtration, and stabilization lor
metals.
July 8, 1089 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Cyanides (Total)
Cyanides
(Amenable)
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Nickel
1.9
0.10
0.32
0.04
0.44
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Alkaline chlorlnatlon lor amenable and
total cyanides; precipitation, settling,
miration, and sludge dewaterlng lor
metals.
July 8. 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
* • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEP'^Y ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.14
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date2
FOOO Spent stripping and cleaning bath
solutions from electroplating
operations where cyanides are
used.
F010 Quenching bath residues from oil baths from
metal heal treating operations where cyanides
are used In the process.
Nonwastewaters


Alkaline chlortnatlon for amenable and



total cyanides; precipitation, settling.
Cyanides (Total
SO0
NA
llltrallon, and stabilization lor
Cyanides


metals.
(Amenable)
30
NA

Cadmium
NA
0.068

Chromium (Total)
NA
5.2

Lead
NA
0.51

Nickel
NA
0.32

Silver
NA
0.072

Wastewaters



Cyanides (Total)
1.0
NA
Alkaline chlortnatlon, for amenable and
Cyanides


total cyanides; precipitation, aetUIng,
(Amenable)
0.10
NA
Oltratlon, and sludge dewaterlng for
Chromium (Total)
0.32
NA
metals.
Lead
0.04
NA

Nickel
0.44
NA

Nonwastewaters


Incineration.
Cyanides (Total)
1.5
NA

Wastewaters


Alkaline chlortnatlon for amenable and total



cyanides; precipitation, settling, filtration, and
Cyanides (Total)
1.0
NA
sludge dewaterlng tor metals.
Cyanides



(Amenable)
0.10
NA

July 8, 1080 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
July 8, 1088 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1088)
June 8, 1080
June 8, 1089
• • • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * " SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEPH=Y ALL INFORMATION " ' *
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.1S
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis tor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "V
noted by *)
F011 Spent cyanide solutions from salt bath pot
cleaning from metal heat treating operations.
Nonwastewelers
Cyanides (Total)
110
NA
Cyanides


(Amenable)
0.1
NA
Cadmium
NA
0.066
Chromium (Total)
NA
6.2
Lead
NA
0.51
Nickel
NA
0.32
Silver
NA
0.072
Electrolytic oxidation followed by
alkaline chlorinatlon lor amenable and
total cyanides; precipitation, settling,
stabilization ol metals.
July 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Alkaline chlorinatlon lor amenable and	July 8, 1089
Cyanides (Total)
1.9
NA
total cyanides; precipitation, settling
Cyanides


nitration, and sludge dewaterlng for
(Amenable)
0.10
NA
metals.
Chromium (Total)
0.32
NA

Lead
0.04
NA

Nickel
0.44
NA

• • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEP'^ A.U. INFORMATION " " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.18
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
F012 Quenching wastewater treatment sludges from
metal heat treating operations where cyanides
are used In the process.
Nonwastewaters
Cyanides (Total)
110
NA
Cyanides


(Amenable)
9.1
NA
Cadmium
NA
0.066
Chromium (Total)
NA
5.2
Lead
NA
0.51
Nickel
NA
0.32
Silver
NA
0.072
Wastewaters


Cyanides (Total)
1.9
NA
Cyanide


(Amenable)
0.10
NA
Chromium (Total)
0.32
NA
Lead
0.04
NA
Nickel
0.44
NA
Electrolytic oxidation lollowed by alkaline
chlorinatlon lor amenable and total cyanides;
precipitation, settling, stabilization at metals.
July B, 1089
Alkaline chlorinatlon lor amenable and total
cyanides; precipitation, settling, nitration, and
sludge dowaterlng lor metals.
July 8, 1989
• • * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.17
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgfl)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date2
F019 Wastewater treatment sludges from the
chemical conversion coating of aluminum.
Nonwastewaters
Cyanides (Total)	5 00
Cyanides (Amenable)	30
Chromium (Total)	NA
NA
NA
5.2
Alkaline chlorlnatlon lor cyanides and stabilization August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
for chromium.	a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Cyanides (Total)	1.2
Cyanides (Amenable)	0.88
Chromium (Total)	0.32
NA
NA
NA
Alkaline chlorlnatlon for cyanides and chromium
reduction followed by chemical precipitation lor
chromium.
August 8, 1990 ((Restricted
as a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
F020- For treatment standards lor F020-F023, see
F023 Appendix A-2 (Solvents and Dloxlns)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.1B
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date
F024
Wastes, Including, but not limited to, distillation
Nonwastewaters


Incineration (as a method to destroy dloxlns and
June 8, 1989 lor all except
residues, heavy ends, tare, and reactor



lurans); stabilization lor metals. .
metals; August 8, 1990, for
cleanout wastes from the production of
Chromium (Total)
NA
0.073

metals (dloxln and luran
chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, having
Nickel (Total)
NA
0.088

concentration standards
carbon content from one to five, utilizing free
Lead
NA
0.021

dropped In Third Third rule
radical catalyzed processes. 1This list does not
2-Chloro-t,3



and replaced by a method of
Include light ends, spent lllters and filter aids,
¦butadiene
0.28
NA

treatment)
spent deslccants, wastewater, wastewater
3-Chloropropene
0.28
NA


treatment sludges, spent catalysts, and wastes
1,1-Dlchloroethane
0.014
NA


listed In §26(.32/.
1,2-Dlchloroethane
0.014
NA



1,2-Dlchloropropana
0.014
NA



cls-1,3-





Dlchloropropene
0.014
NA



trans-1,3-





Dlchloropropene
0.014
NA



Bls(2-ethylhexyl)





phthalate
1.8
NA



Hexachtorethane
1.8
NA


• * * DRAFT 6/80 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED AO CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A 4.19
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date1
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
F024
(continued)
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)	0.35
Nickel (Total)	0.47
2-Chloro-1,3
-butadiene	0.28
3-Chloropropene	0.28
1,1 -Dlchloroethane	0.014
1,2-Dlchloroethane	0.014
1,2-Olchloropropane	0.014
cls-1,3-
Dlchloropropene	0.014
trans-1,3-
Dlchloropropene	0.014
Bls(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate	0.038
Hexachloroethane	0.038
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Incineration (as a method to destroy dloxlns and
furans); stabilization lor metals. .
June 8, 1988 (dloxln and
turan concentration standards
dropped In Third Third rule
and replaced by a method ol
treatment)
F02S Condensed light ends, spent filters and filter
aids, and spent deslccant wastes from the
production of certain chlorinated allphatlcs.
Light Ends subcategory
Nonwastewaters
Chloroform	6.2
1,2-Dlchloroethane	6.2
1,1-Dlchloroethylene	6.2
Methylene chloride	31
Carbon tetrachloride	6.2
1,1,2-Trlchloroelhane	6.2
Trlchloroethylene	5.6
Vinyl chloride	33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
' • ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VER!FY ALL INFORMATION ' " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.20
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Ellectlve Date1
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by**)
noted by *)
F02S (continued')	Wastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1980
Chloroform
1,2-Dlchloroethana
1,1-Dlchloroethylene
Methylene chloride
Carbon tetrachloride
1,1,2-Tricholoethane
Trlchloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Spent Filters/Filter Aids
0.046*
NA
0.21*
NA
0.025*
NA
0.089"
NA
0.057*
NA
0.054*
NA
0.054*
NA
0.27*
NA
and Deslccanta
Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8. 1990
Chloroform
6.2
NA
Methylene chloride
31
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
6.2
NA
1,1,2-Trichlomethane
6.2
NA
Trlchloroelhytane
5.6
NA
Vinyl chloride
33
NA
Hexachlorobenzene
37
NA
Haxachlorobutadiene
28
NA
Haxachloroethane
30
NA
- * • DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* * ' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • " •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.21
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
F025 (continued)	Wastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1090
Chlorotorm
0.046*
NA
Methylene chloride
0.089*
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
0.057'
NA
1.1,2-Trlchloroethane
0.054*
NA
Trlchloroethytena
0.054*
NA
Vinyl chloride
0.27*
NA
Hexachlorobenzene
0.055*
NA
Hexachlorobutadlene
0.055*
NA
Hexachloroethane
0.055*
NA
F026- For treatment standards lor F028-F028, see
F028 Appendix A-2 (Solvents and Dloxlns)
F039 For treatment standards lor F039, see Appendix
AS (multi-source Leachate)
• * * DRAFT 6190 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * ' *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEF ^ALL INFORMATION • " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND. AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.22
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K001
Bottom sediment sludge Irom the treatment ol
wastewaters Irom wood preserving processes
that use creosote and/or pentachlorophanol.
Nonwastewaters


Naphthalene
1.5 (8.0)
NA
Pentachlorophenol
7.4 (37)
NA
Phenanthrene
1.5 (8.0)
NA
Pyrene
1.5 (7.3)
NA
Toluene
28(6.14)
NA
Xylenes
33(0.18)
NA
Lead
NA
0.51
Wastewaters


Naphthalene
0.031 (0.15)
NA
Pentachlorophenol
0.18(0.88)
NA
Phenanthrene
0.031 (0.15)
NA
Pyrene
0.028(0.14)
NA
Toluene
0.028(0.14)
NA
Xylenes
0.032(0.18)
NA
Lead
0.037 (0.037)
NA
Nonwastewaters


Chromium (Total)
NA
0.094
Lead
NA
0.37
Wastewaters


Chromium (Total)
2.9'
NA
Lead
3.4'
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration lollowed by stabilization.
Chemical precipitation ol scrubber water from
rotary kiln Incineration.
August 8, 1988 (Treatment
standards lor organlcs
revised In Third Third rule
and are effective August 8,
1690; old organic standards
() In effect as ol August 8,
1688)
August 8, 1988 (Treatment
standards lor organlcs
revised In Third Third rule
and are effective August 8,
1690; old organic standards
( ) In effect as ol August 8,
1888)
K002
wastes.
Chemical precipitation, sludge dewaterlng, and
llltratlon.
August 8, 1990
Chromium reduction, chemlcel precipitation, and August 8, 1990
sludge dewatering.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
" * • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VEP'™ ALL INFORMATION " * "
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.23
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **J
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
K0Q3 Molybdate orange pigment production wastes. Nonwaatewater
Chromium (Total)
Lead
NA
NA
0.094
0.37
Chemical precipitation, sludge dewatering, and
filtration.
Augusts, 1990
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
2.9
3.4'
NA
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and August 9, 1990
sludge dewatering.
K004 Wastewater treatment sludge from the
production of zinc yellow pigments.
Nonwastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
NA
NA
0.094
0.37
Chemical precipitation, sludge dewatering, and
filtration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989; no land
disposal based on no
generation from August 8,
1988, through June 8, 1989)
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
2.9
3.4'
NA
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and
sludge dewatering.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
• • * DRAFT 6/00 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • *
-------
APPENDIX A*
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.24
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TOP (mg/1)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date2
K005 Wastewater treatment sludge from the
production ol chrome green pigments.
Nonwastewaters


Chemical precipitation, sludge dewaterlng, and



filtration.
Chromium (Total)
NA
0.004

Lead
NA
0.37

Cyanides (Total)
NA
Reserved

Wastewaters


Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation,



sludge dewaterlng, and alkaline chlorlnatlon lor
Chromium (Total)
2.9*
NA
cyanides.
Lead
3.4'
NA

Cyanides (Total)
0.74'
NA

Nonwastewaters


Chemical precipitation, sludge dewaterlng, and



UltraOon. StahlllraHon lor hydrated chromium.
Anhydrous



Chromium (Total)
NA
0.094

Lead
NA
0.37

Hydrated



Chromium (Total)
NA
S.2

Wastewaters


Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and



sludge dewaterlng.
Chromium (Total)
2.0'
NA

Lead
3.4'
NA

August 8, 1000 (Restricted as
no land disposal based on
no generation or a soft
hammer waste as ol June 8,
1080)
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8. 1080)
K006
Chrome oxide green pigment production
wastes.
August 8, 1000
' • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
" * " SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.25
Waste
Coda
Daacriptlon
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Aa Basis tor Standards
Effective Date2
K007 Wastewater treatment sludge from the
production ol Iron blue pigments.
K008 Oven residue from the production ol chrome
oxide green pigments.
K009 Distillation bottoms from the production ol
acetatdehyde from ethylene.
Nonwastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Cyanides (Total)
NA
NA
NA .
0.094
0.37
Reserved
Chemical precipitation, sludge dewaterlng, and
filtration.
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Cyanides (Total)
2.9'
3.4'
0.74'
NA
NA
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, end
sludge dewaterlng, alkaline chlorlnatlon lor
cyanides.
Nonwastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
NA
NA
0.094
0.37
Chemical precipitation, sludge dewaterlng, and
nitration.
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Lead
2.9'
3.4'
NA
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and
sludge dewaterlng.
Nonwastewaters


Incineration.
Chloroform
6.0
NA

Wastewaters


Steam stripping lollowed by biological treatment.
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
no land disposal based on
no generation or a soft
hammer waste as ol June 0.
1088)
August 8, 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1080)
August 8, 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammered waste as ol
June 8, >009; no land
disposal based on no
generation from August 8,
1088, through June 8. 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammered waste as of
August 8, 1988)
June 8. 1989
Chloroform
0.10
NA
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• • - SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * ' "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.26
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg!1)	(or BP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date3
K010 Distillation side cuts from the production ol
acetaldehyde from ethylene.
Nonwastowatara
Chloroform
Wastewaters
Chloroform
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
0.0
0.10
NA
NA
Steam stripping followed by biological treatment. June 8, 1989
K011 Bottom stream from wastewater stripper In the
production of acrylonltrlle.
Nonwastewaters
Acetonltrile
1.8
NA
Acrylonltrlle
1.4
NA
Aciytamlde
23
NA
Benzene
0.03
NA
Cyanides (Total)
$7
NA
Wastewaters


Acetonltrile
38.0
NA
Acrylonltrlle
0.06
NA
Acrytamlda
19.0
NA
Benzene
0.02
NA
Cyanide (Total)
21
NA
Incineration.
Wet-air oxidation.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • ' •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES*
A-4.27
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCIP (mglt)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
KOI3 Bottom stream from acetonltrile column In the
production of aerytonltrile.
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
K014
the production of acryionltrlla.
Acetonltrile
1.8
NA
Aerytonltrile
1.4
NA
Acrytamlde
23
NA
Benzene
0.03
NA
Cyanides (Total)
57
NA
Wastewaters


Acetonltrile
38.0
NA
Aerytonltrile
0.06
NA
Acrytamida
10.0
NA
Benzene
0.02
NA
Cyanide (Total)
21
NA
i Nonwastewaters


Acetonltrile
1.8
NA
Aerytonltrile
1.4
NA
Acrytamida
23
NA
Benzene
0.03
NA
Cyanides (Total)
57
NA
Wastewaters


Acetonltrile
38.0
NA
Aerytonltrile
0.06
NA
Acrytamlde
10.0
NA
Benzene
0.02
NA
Cyanide (Total)
21
NA
Wet-alr oxidation.
Incineration.
Wet-alr oxidation.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1888)
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1088)
June 8, 1980.(Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1088)
August 8. 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1088)
• " * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.28
Waste
Coda
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by
noted by *)
Bost Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
K01S Still bottoms from the distillation of benzyl
chloride.
Nonwaatewatera


Anthracene
3.4
NA
Benzol chloride
6.2
NA
Benzo (b andlor k)


fluoranthene
3.4
NA
Phenanthrene
3.4
NA
Tolulene
6.0
NA
Total chromium
NA
1.7
Nickel
NA
0.2
Wastewaters


Anthracene
1.0
NA
Benzal chloride
0.28
NA
Benzofb andlor k)


lluoranthene
0.29
NA
Phenanthrene
0.27
NA
Toluene
0.15
NA
Total chromium
0 32
NA
Nickel
0.44
NA
Incineration followed by stabilization.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammered waste as of
June 8, 1989; no land
disposal based on no ash as
of August 8, 1988)
Chemical precipitation ol scrubber
water from liquid Infection
Incineration.
August 8. 1988
• * * DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * ¦ •
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A429
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	Aa Basis tor Standards	Effective Date3
¦ or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by ')
KOI8 Heavy ends or distillation residues from the
production of carbon tetrachloride.
K017 Heavy ends (still bottoms) from the purification
column In the production ol oplchlorohydrin.
Nonwastewaters


Hexachlorobemane
28
NA
Htxachlorobutedlene
5.6
NA
Hexachlorocyclo-


pentadlana
5.6
NA
Hexachloroethane
28
NA
Tetiachloroethene
6.0
NA
Wastewaters


Hexachtorobenzene
0.033
NA
Hexachlorobutadlene
0.007
NA
Hexachlorocyclo-


pentadlene
0.007
NA
Hexachloroethane
0.033
NA
Tetiachloroethene
0.007
NA
i Nonwaatewaters


1-2 Dlchloropropane
18
NA
1,2,3- Trlchloropropane
28
NA
Bis (2-chloroethyt) ether
7.2
NA
Wastewaters


1-2 Dlchloropropane
.85
NA
1,2,3- Trlchloropropane
.85
NA
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
.033
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration.
August 8, 1088
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 8, 1088
Incineration.
Incineration.
Wastewater treatment.'
August 8. 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8. 1088)
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1088)
' ' ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • ¦
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.30
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/lf	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
KOI8 Heavy ends from the fractionation column In
ethyl chloride production.
Nonwaatawaters
Chloroethanm	6.0
1.1-Dlchloroethane	6.0
1.2-Dichloroethane	6.0
Hexachlorobanzene	28
Hexachlorobutadlene	5.8
Hexachloroethane	28
Pentachloroethane	5.6
1,1,1-Trlchloro-
ethane	6.0
Rotary kiln Incineration.
August 8, 1988
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Wastewaters
Chloroethanm	0.007
Chloromethane	0.007
1.1-Dlchloroethane	0.007
1.2-Dlchloroethane	0.007
Hexachlorobenzene	0.033
Hexachlorobutadlene	0.007
Pentachloroothano	0.007
1.1.1-Trlchloro-
ethane	0.007
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 8, 1888
Incineration.
• • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.31
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
KOI9 Heavy ends from the distillation of ethylene
dlcNorlde In ethylene dlchloride production.
Nonwastewatera


Bls(2-chk>roethyl)


ether
5.6
NA
Chlorobemene
6.0
NA
Chloroform
6.0
NA
1,2-Dlchloroethane
6.0
NA
Hexachloroethane
28
NA
Napthalen*
5.6
NA
Phenanthrene
5.8
NA
Tetrachloroethene
6.0
NA
1,2,4-Trlchloro-


benzene
to
NA
1,1,1-TrhMoro-


othane
6.0
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration.
Augusts, 1988
' ' • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • " °
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, MID THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.32
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration for Any
Wasta	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgtl)	Aa Baals lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
K019 (continued)	Wastewaters	Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 0. 1088
Incineration.
BJa(2ctiloroethyl)
ether
0.007
NA
Chlombanzene
0.000
NA
Chloroform
0.007
NA
p-Dlchlorobenzene
0.008
NA
1,2-Dlchloroethane
0.007
NA
Fluorene
0.007
NA
Hexachloroethane
0.033
NA
Naphthalene
0.007
NA
Phenanthrene
0.007
NA
1,2,4,6-Tetrachloro-


benzene
0.017
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.007
NA
1,2,4-Trichloro-


benzene
0.023
NA
1,1,1-Trichloro-


ethane
0.007
NA
• * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ° * "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES*
A-4.33
1Haste
Coda
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Qtab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or CP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards	Effective Date2
K020 Heavy ends from the distillation
ol vinyl chloride In vinyl
chloride production.
K021 Aqueous spent antimony catalyst waste from
ftuoromethanes production.
Nonwastewatera


1,2-Dlchloroethane
8.0
NA
1,1,2,2-Tetra-


chloroethane
5.8
NA
Tetrachtoroathan*
6.0
NA
Wastewaters


1,2-Dlchloroethane
0.007
NA
1,1,2,2-Tetra-


cMoroathane
0.007
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.007
NA
Nonwastewaters


Chloroform
8.2
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
8.2
NA
Antimony
NA
0.23'
Wastewaters


Chloroform
.046'
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
.057*
NA
Antimony
0.60*
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration.
Augusts. 1908
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 8. 1088
Incineration.
Incineration followed by stabilization for antimony. August 8, 1990 (No land
disposal based on no
generation after August 17,
1988; soft hammer provisions
did not apply to waste
disposed of before August
17, 1988)
Wastewater treatment,a
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
' " ' DRAFT S/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
1 SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * "
-------
APPENDIX A~4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.34
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Graft or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
K022 Distillation bottom tars from the
production of phenol/acetone
from cumane.
Nonwastewaters
Acetophenone	19
Stan o/ Diphenyiamlne
& Dlphenytnltrosamine	13
Phenol	12
Toluene	0.034
Chromium (Total)	NA
Nickel	NA
Fuel substitution followed by metals stabilization. August 8, 1688
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.2
0.32
K023 Distillation light ends from the production of
phthallc anhydride from naphthalene.
Wastewaters
Toluene	.080*
Acetophenone	.010
Dlphenylamlne	.52*
Dlphanylnltroaamlne	.40
Sum of Dlphenylamlne and
Dlpheynlnltroaamlne	NA
Phenol	.03$
Chromium (Total)	0.35
Nickel	0.47
Nonwastewaters
Phthallc acid
(Phthallc anhydride)
28
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
One or a combination ol two or more ol the
following technologies: biological treatment,
steam stripping, carbon adsorption, liquid
extraction and others.
Chemical precipitation followed by vacuum
nitration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
Rotary kiln Incineration.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Phthallc acid
(Phthallc anhydride)
0.54
NA
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln June 8, 1989
incineration.
* • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
" " * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.35
Wasfa
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Data2
K024 Distillation bottoms Irom the production ot
phthallc anhydride from naphthalene.
Nonwaatewaters
Phthallc acid	28
(Phthallc anhydride)
Wastewaters
Phthallc add	0.54
(Phthallc anhydride)
Rotary kiln Incineration.
August 8, 1008
NA
NA
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 8. 1988
Incineration.
K02S
Distillation bottoms from the production of
nitrobenzene by the nitration of benzene.
Nonwaatewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Uquld-tlquld extraction followed by
steam stripping followed by carbon absorption: or
Incineration.
Incineration.
Uquld-tlquld extraction followed by steam
stripping followed by carbon adsorption or
Incineration.
K026 Stripping still tails from the production of methyl Nonwasterwatars
ethyl pyridines.
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Incineration.
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (No land
disposal based on no
generation after August 17,
1988; soft hammer provisions
did not apply before).
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste on June
8, 1989)
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
- ' ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.36
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Tola/ (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
KQ27 Centrifuge and distillation
residues from toluene dJIsocyarmto
production.
Nonwastawaters
Treatment technology
fuel substitution.
Incineration or
Incineration or fuel substitution.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 0, 1909
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption
or Incineration; or pretreatment (such as
biological treatment or chemical oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
K028 Spent catalyst from the hydrochlorinator reactor Nonwastawaters
In the production ot 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
Incineration followed by stabilization of metals.
1,1-Dlchloroathane
6.0
NA
trans-1,2-


Dichtoroethene
6.0
NA
Hexachlorobutadlene
5.6
NA
Hexachloroethano
28
NA
Pentachloroethane
5.6
NA
1,1,1,2-


Tetrachloroethane
5.6
NA
1,1,2,2-


Tetrachloroethane
5.6
NA
1,1,1-


Trichloroethane
6.0
NA
1,1,2


Trichloroethane
6.0
NA
Tetrachloroethylene
6.0
NA
Chromium (Total)
NA
.073
Nickel
NA
.088
Lead
NA
.021
June 8, 1989; August 8, 1990
for chromium, nickel, and
lead (restricted for first time
In Third Third rule)
' * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.37
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Cod*	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Baals lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by ')
K028 (continued)	Wastewaters	Incineration.	June 0. 1989
1,1 -Dlchloroethane
0.007
NA
rens-1,2-


Dlchtoroethone
0.033
NA
Hoxachlorobutadlene
0.007
NA
Hexachloroethane
0.033
NA
Hontachloroethane
0.033
NA
1,1,1,2-


TeUacMoroethane
0.007
NA
1.1.2.2


Tetrachtoroethane
0.007
NA
Tetrachloroethytene
0.007

1,1,1-


Trichloroethane
0.007
NA
1.1.2-


Trichloroethane
0.007
NA
Chromium (Total)
0.35
NA
Nickel
0.47
NA
Cadmium
6.4
NA
Lead
0.037
NA
• • • DRAFT 6/80 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' ' * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION - * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.38
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
K029 Waste from the product steam stripper In the Normastewaters
production of 1,1,1-trichhroethane.
Chlorolorm
1,2-Dlchloroethane
1.1-
Dlchloroethylene
1.1.1-
Trlchloroethana
Vinyl Chloride
Incineration.
June 0, 1089
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
Wastewaters
Chlorolorm	.046
1,2 Dlchloroethane	0.21
1,1-Dlchloroothylene	0.25
1,1,1- Trlchloroethana	.054
Vinyl Chloride	0.27
Wastewater treatment.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a aolt hammer waste as oi
June 8. 1080)
* * * DRAFT 6190 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX A~4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.39
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Data2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
K03Q Column bottoms or heavy ends from
the combined production of
trichloroathylene and
perchhroethytene.
Nonwastewaters
Haxachlorobutadlene	5.6
Hexachloroethana	28
Hexachloropropene	10
Pentachloroberuane	20
Pentachloroethane	5.0
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
beruene	14
Tetrachloroethena	6.0
1,2,4-TrUMoro-
benzene	19
Rotary kiln Incineration.
August 8, 1988
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Wastewaters
o-Dlchlorobenzene	0.000
p-Dlchlorobenzene	0.008
Hexachlorobutadlene	0.007
Hexachloroethana	0.033
Pentachloroethane	0.007
1,2,4,6- Tetrachloro-
benzene	0.017
Tetrachloroethene	0.007
1,2,4-TricNoro-
benzene	0.023
Concentrations In scrubber water from rotary kiln August 8, 1988
Incineration.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * "
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.40
Wasta
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TClf (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
K031 By-product salts generated In the
production ol MSMA and cacodyttc arid.
Nonwastewmters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
NA
0.79
9.6
NA
Vitrification.
Chemical precipitation.
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1688)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
KQ32 Chlordane production wastes.
Nonwastewatera
Hexechlorocyclopentadlane
2.4
Chlordane	0.26
Heptachlor	0.068
Heptachlor epoxide	0.066
Wastewaters
Hexachloro-
cyclopentadlene	0.057'
Chlordane	0.0033j
Heptachlor	0.0012'
Heptachlor epoxide	0.016
Incineration.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Wastewater treatment
August 8, 1990
August 8. 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CfTE OR QUOTE * • *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.41
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
ormgll)
(composite
noted by ')
TCLP (nigII)
(or EP. noted
by")
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K033 CMordana production wastes.
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
Augusts, 1090
Haxachloro-
cyclopontadlene
Wastewaters
2.4
NA
Wastewater treatment8
August 8, 1990
HaxacMoro-
cyclopentadlena
.057
NA
K034 CMordane production wastes.
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
AugustB, 1990
Hexachloro-
cyclopentadlene
2.4
NA
Wastewaters
Wastewater treatment
August 8, 1990
Hexachloro-
cyclopentadlene
0.057
NA
• ¦ • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.42
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K035 Wastewater treatment sludges generated
In the production ol creosote.
Nonwaslewatera
Acenaphttmne	3.4
Anthracene	3.4
Benz(a) anthracene	3.4
Benzo(a)pyrene	3.4
Chryaene	3.4
Dlbenz(a,h) anthracene 3.4
Fluoranthene	3.4
Fluorene	3.4
lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 3.4
Naphthalene	3.4
Phenanthrene	3.4
Pyrene	8.2
Wastewaters
Bem(a)anthracano	0.059"
Cluysene	0.058*
Fluoranthene	0.068"
Cresols (m- and p-
Isomers)	0.77
Naphthalene	0.059*
o-cresot	0.11
Phenanthrene	0.059*
Phenol	0.030
Pyrene	0.067*
Incineration.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste aa ol
August 8, 1988)
One or a combination ol two or more ol the
following: Biological treatment, steam stripping,
carbon adsorption, and liquid extraction.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
Augusts, 1988)
• * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
0 • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.43
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards	EHective Date2
K036 Still bottoms from toluene reclamation
distillation In the production ot
dlsulfoton.
Nonwastewaters
Dlsulfoton
Wastewaters
Dlsulloton
Rotary kiln Incineration.
0.1
NA
Biological treatment
0.025
NA
August 8, 1090 (No land
disposal based on no
generation after August 17,
1008; soft hammer provisions
did not apply before August
17, 1988)
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as ot
August 8. 1988)
K037 Wastewater treatment sludge from
the production ot dlsulfoton.
Nonwastewaters
Dlsulloton
Toluene
Wastewaters
Dlsulfoton
Toluene
0.1
28
0.02S (0.003)
0.080 (0.028)
NA
NA
NA
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration.
Biological treatment
August 8, 1988
August 8, 1990 (Standards
revised from First Third rule
standards In ( ) In effect as of
August 8, 1988
K038 Wastewater from the washing and
stripping ot phorate production.
Nonwastewaters
Phorate
Wastewaters
Phorate
0.1
0.025
NA
NA
Incineration.
Biological treatment
June 8. 1989
June 8, 1989
• * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' * • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.44
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP. noted
by")
Aa Basis tor Standards
Effective Date2
K039 Filter cake Irom the filtration.
oI diethyl phosphorodlc acid In
the production ot phorale.
Nonwaatewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatmant (such aa biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
KO40 Wastewater treatment sludge Irom
the production of phorate.
Nonwaatewaters
Phorate
Wastewaters
Phorale
0.1
0.025
NA
NA
Incineration.
Biological treatment
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
K041 Wastewater treatment sludge from
the production of toxaphene.
Nonwastewaters
Toxaphene
Wastewaters
Toxaphene
2.6
0.0095
NA
NA
Incineration.
Wastewater treatment
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a solt hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
• ' * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • «
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.4 5
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Wasta	Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by ')
K042 Heavy ends or distillation residues
from the distillation of
tetrachlorobenzene In the
production ot 2,4,5-T.
Nonwastewatara
1,2,4,5-Tetrachhro-
benzene	4.4
o-Dlchktroberaene	4.4
p-DkMorobenzene	4.4
PentatMorobenzene	4.4
1,2,4-Trtchtorobenzene	4.4
Wastewaters
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
benzene	0.055
o-Dlchlorobenzene	0.008
p-Dlchlorobenzene	0.090
PentatMorobenzene	0.055
1,2.4-Trlchlorobanzena	0.055
Incineration.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Wastewater treatment'
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8. 1989)
' * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX 4-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
4-4.46
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Boat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	4s Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
K043 2,6-Dlchlorophenol waste from the production Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	June 8. 1989
ol 2,4-D.
2,4-Dichlorophenol
0.38
NA
2,6- Dlchloroph enol
0.34
NA
Pentachktrophenol
1.9
NA
Tetrachloroethene
1.7
NA
Tetrachlorophonota


(Total)
0.68
NA
2,4,5-


Trlchlorophenol
8.2
NA
2,4.8-


Trlchlorophenol
7.8
NA
Hexachlorodiberuo-


p-dkuina
0.001
NA
Hexachlorodibenzo-


turana
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodlbanzo-


p-dkudna
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodlbenzo-


lurans
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbanzo-


p-dkudna
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodibenio-


lurana
0.001
NA
• • • DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.47
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Bast Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	Aa Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
K043 (continued)	Waatawatara	Incineration.	June 8, 1989
2,4-Dlchlorophenol
0.049
NA
2.8-DkMorophenoi
0.013
NA
Pentachkuophenol
0.22
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.006
NA
Tetrachiorophenota


(Total)
0.018
NA
2,4.6-


Trichlorophenol
0.018
NA
2,4,8-


Trlchlorophertol
0.039
NA
Hexachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Hexachlorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Pantachlorodlberuo-


p-dkudna
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-


lurans
0.001
NA
K044 Wastewater treatment sludges from the	Nonwastewaters	Deactivation1
manufacturing and processing of explosives.
Treatment technology - deactivation
Wastewaters	Deactivation3
Treatment technology - deactivation
August 8. 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
' • * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
* • 'SEE REVISED 40 CFFt PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " •
-------
APPENDIX J1-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.48
Waste
Cod•
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tot Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted .
(composite	by")
noted by ")
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
K045 Spent carbon from the treatment of wastewater Nonwastewaters
containing explosbes.
Treatment technology - deactivation
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - deactivation
Deactivation3
Deactivation3
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
no land disposal as of August
8. 1988)
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
no land disposal as of August
8. 1988)
K048 Wastewater treatment sludges horn
the manufacturing, formulation, and
loading ot lead based Initiating
compounds.
Nonwastewatera
Non-reactive
Lead	NA
Reactive
Lead	NA
Wastewaters
Reactive and Non-Reactive
Lead	0.037
Deactivation3 followed by stabilization.
0.18
0.18
NA
Stabilization.
Deactivation and chemical precipitation.
Augusta, 1988
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusta, 1988)
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ot
Augusta, 1888)
• • " DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.49
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by *)
K047 Pink/red water from TNT operations.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • deactivation
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - deactivation
Deactivation.3
Deactivation.9
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
no land disposal as ol August
8, 1988)
August 8, 1988 (Restricted as
no land disposal as of August
8. 1988)
KD48 Dissolved air flotation (DAF) float from the
petroleum refining Industry.
Nonwastewmters
Benzene
14
NA
Benzo(a)pyrene
12
NA
Bls(2-ethylhexyi')


phthalate
7.3
NA
Chrysena
15
NA
Dhn-butyl phthalate
3.8

Ethylbenzene
14
NA
Naphthalene
42
NA
Phenanthrene
34
NA
Phenol
3.6
NA
Pyrene
36
NA
Toluene
14
NA
Xylenes
22
NA
Total Chromium
NA
1.7
Nickel
NA
0.20
Solvent extraction or Incineration for organic and
cyanide constituents, and stabilization for metal
constituents.
November 8, 1990
(Rescheduled as a Third
Third waste; old standards
promulgated as of August 8,
1988, but waste restricted
under national capacity
variance from August 8, 1988
until November 8, 1990)
• • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.SO
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K046 (continued)
Wastewaters


Bemane
0.011
NA
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.047
NA
Bia(2-ethythaxyl)


phthalate
0.043
NA
Chrysene
0.043
NA
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
0.060
NA
Ethylbenzene
0.011
NA
Fluorene
0.050
NA
Naphthalene
0.033
NA
Phenanthrene
0.039
NA
Phenol
0.047
NA
Pyrene
0.045
NA
Toluene
0.011
NA
Xylenes
0.011
NA
Total cyanides
0.028
NA
Total Chromium
0.20
NA
Lead
0.037
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical
precipitation, and nitration of
scrubber water from fluidUed
bed Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Rescheduled
as a Third Third waste; old
standards promulgated as ot
August 8, 1988, but waste
restricted under national
capacity variance Irom
August 8, 1988 until August 8,
1990)
• * * DRAFT 6/90 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • •
• "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION " * •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.S1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tot Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "')
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date3
K049 Slop oil emulsion solids trom the petroleum
refining Industry.
Nonwastewatars


Solvent extraction or Incineration for organic and
cyanide constituents, and stabllliaOon or
November 8, 1990
(Rescheduled as a Third
Anthracene
28
NA
chemical precipitation lor metal constituents.
Third waste; old standards
Benzana
14
NA

promulgated as ol August 8,
Beruo(a)pyr«ne
12
NA

1988, but waste restricted
BlsfZ-ettrylhexyt)



under national capacity
phthalate
7.3
NA

variance from August 8, 1988
Chrysene
15
NA

until November 8, 1990)
Ethylbenzene
14
NA


Naphthalene
42
NA


Phenanthrene
34
NA


Phenol
3.6
NA


Pyrene
36
NA


Toluene
14
NA


Xylenes
22
NA


Cyanides (Total)
1.8
NA


Total Chromium
NA
1.7


Nickel
NA
0.20


' ' • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " "
-------
APPENDIX 4-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AMD EFFECTIVE OATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AMD THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.52
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Slanttewfa
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Simla Qrab 
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4. S3
Wasta
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Aa Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
KOSO Heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge from
the petroleum rellnlng Industry.
Nonwastewalera
Benzo(a)pytene
Phenol
Cyanides (Total)
Total Chromium
Nickel
12
3.6
1.8
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.7
0.20
Solvent extraction or Incineration lor organic and
cyanide constituents, and stabilization or
chemical precipitation lor metal constituents.
Novembers, 1990
(Rescheduled as a Third
Third waste; old standards
promulgated as of August 8,
1988, but waste restricted
under national capacity
variance Irom August 8, 1988
until November 8, 1990)
Wastewaters
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenol
Total cyanides
Total Chromium
Lead
0.047
0.047
0.028
0.20
0.037
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and
nitration o/ scrubber water from ttukttzed bed
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Rescheduled
aa a Third Third waste; old
standards promulgated as ot
August 8, 1988, but waste
restricted under national
capacity variance from
August 8, 1988 until August 8,
1990)
• • • DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
1 SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * • •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.54
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Qreb or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ">
noted by ")
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
K0S1 API Separator sludge from the petroleum
refining Industry.
Normastewaters


Solvent extraction or Incineration lor organic and
cyanide constituents, and stabilization or
November 8, 1990
(Rescheduled as a Third
Anthracene
28
NA
chemical precipitation tor mala/ constituents.
Third waste; old standards
Benzene
14
NA
promulgated as ol August $,
Benzo(a)anthracene
20
NA

1088. but waste restricted
Benzo(a)pyrene
12
NA

under national capacity
Bis(2-ethythexyi)



variance from August 8, 1888
phthelate
7.3
NA

until November 8, 1990)
Chrysene
15
NA


Dl-n-butyl




phthalate
3.6
NA


Ethylberuene
14
NA


Naphthalene
42
NA


Phenanthrene
34
NA


Phenol
3.6
NA


Pyrene
36
NA


Toluene
14
NA


Xylenes
22
NA


Cyanides (Total)
1.6
NA


Total Chromium
NA
1.7


Nickel
NA
0.20


* • ' DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 26ft TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.5S
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K051 (continued)
Wastewaters


Acenaphthane
0.050
NA
Anthracene
0.030
NA
Benzene
0.011
NA
Bemo(a)anthracane
0.043
NA
Bemo(a)pyrene
0.047
NA
Bla(2-ethythexyl)


phthalale
0.043
NA
Chrysene
0.043
NA
Dl-n-butyl phthalale
0.060

Ethyl benzene
0.011
NA
Fluorene
0.050
NA
Naphthalene
0.033
NA
Phenanthrene
0.030
NA
Phenol
0.047
NA
Pyrene
0.045
NA
Toluene
0.011
NA
Xylenes
0.011
NA
Total cyanides
0.028
NA
Total Chromium
0.20
NA
Lead
0.037
NA
Chromium reduction, chemical
precipitation, and nitration ol
scrubber water from fluldized
bed Incineration.
August 8, 1000 (Rescheduled
as a Third Third waste; old
standards promulgated as ol
August 8, 1088, but waste
restricted under national
capacity variance Irom
August 8, 1088 until August 8,
1600)
• ' ' DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * «
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.56
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or BP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K0S2 Tank bottoms (leaded) from the petroleum
refining Industry.
Nonwastewaters


Benzene
14
NA
Benzo(a)pyrene
12
NA
o-Cresoi
6.2
NA
p-Cravol
6.2
NA
Ethylbenzene
14
NA
Naphthalene
42
NA
Phenanthrene
34
NA
Phenol
3.8
NA
Toluene
14
NA
Xylenes
22
NA
Cyanides (Total)
1.8
NA
Total Chromium
NA
1.7
Nickel
NA
0.20
Wastewaters


Benzene
0.011
NA
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.047
NA
o-Crasol
0.011
NA
p-Cresol
0.011
NA
2.4-Dlmett>ylphenol
0.033
NA
Ethylbenzene
0.011
NA
Naphthalene
0.033
NA
Phenanthrene
0.030
NA
Phenol
0.047 .
NA
Toluene
0.011
NA
Xylenes
0.011
NA
Total Chromium
0.20
NA
Lead 0.037
NA

Solvent extraction or Incineration for organic and
cyanide constituents, and stabilization or
chemical precipitation lor metal constituents.
November 8, 1900
(Rescheduled as a Third
Third waste; old standards
promulgated aa of August 8,
1988, but waste restricted
under national capacity
variance from August 8, 1988
until November 8, 1000)
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation, and
nitration of scrubber water from fluldlzed bed
Incineration.
August 8, 1090 (Rescheduled
as a Third Third waste; old
standards promulgated as of
August 8, 1088, but waste
restricted under national
capacity variance from
August 8, 1088 until August 8,
1000)
' ' ' DRAFT 6/00 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * 1
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.S7
Treatment Standards
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by
noted by ")
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Aa Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K060 Ammonia still lime sludge horn coking
operations.
Nonwastewaters


Benzene
0.071
NA
Benzofa) pyrene
3.6
NA
Naphthalene
3.4
NA
Phenol
3.4
NA
Cyanides (Total)
3.2
NA
Wastewaters


Bene 0.17
HA

Benzofa) pyrene
0.035
NA
Naphtalene
0.028
NA
Pherol
0.042
NA
Cyanides (Total)
1.9
NA
Incineration.
Chemical reduction followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 0, 1800 (Restricted as
a soft hammer wasta as ol
August 8. 1088)
August B, 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8. 1088)
* • • DRAFT 6100 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* • ' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.58
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Aa Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
K061 Emission control dust/sludge from the primary
production ol steel In electric fumacas.
Nonwastewaters - Interim Treatment Standards6
Stabilization.
Augusts, 1089
High Zinc Subcategory
Cadmium	NA
Chromium	NA
Lead	NA
Nickel	NA
0.14
5.2
0.24
0.32
Nonwastewaters - Final Treatment Standards
High Zinc Subcategory
No land disposal based on recycling.
Low Zinc Subcategory (less than 15% total zinc)
Cadmium
Total Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Wastewaters
Cadmium
Total Chromium
Lead
Nickel
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.61
0.32
0.51
0.44
0.14
5.2
0.24
0.32
NA
NA
NA
NA
High temperature metals recovery.
Stabilization.
May 6. 1991
August 8, 1988
Chemical reduction followed by chemical
precipitators
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8. 1988)
• • • DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.59
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
, (composite	by *')
noted by "J
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Aa Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
K062
Spent pickle liquor generated by steel finishing Nonwastawatara7
operations of faculties within the Iron and atoel
Industry (SIC Codes 331 and 332).	Chromium
Wastewaters7
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
NA
NA
0 32
0.04
0.44
0.094
0.37
NA
NA
NA
Chromium reduction followed by chemical
precipitation.
Chromium reduction followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1989
August 8, 1988
K069 Emission control duat/aludge from secondary
lead smelting.
Nonwastewatera
Calcium Sulfate Subcategory^
Cadmium	' NA
Lead	NA
Non-calcium Sulfate Subcategory
Treatment technology - thermal recovery
Wastewaters
0.14
0.24
Cadmium
Lead 0.S1
1.6
NA
NA
K071 Brine putittcation muds from the mercury cell
process In chlorine production, where
separately prepurllled brine Is not used.
Nonwastewaters
Mercury
Wastewaters
Mercury
NA
0.030
0.02S
NA
Stabilization.
Thermal recovery.
Chemical precipitation.
Acid leaching and chemical oxidation
followed by washlng/dewatering of
solid residues.
Sulfide precipitation followed by
ttltratlon.
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 0, 1990)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
no land disposal as of August
8. 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1990)
August 8. 1988
August 0, 1988
• • • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.60
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	Aa Basis lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
K073 Chlorinated hydrocarbon waste from the
purification step of the diaphragm cell process
using graphite anodes In chlorine production.
Mercury
0.030
NA
Nonwastewatera


Carbon tetrachloride
6.2
NA
Chloroform
6.2
NA
Hexachlomethane
30
NA
Tetrachloroethane
. 6.2
NA
1.1,1-TrkMoroethane
6.2
NA
Wastewaters


Carbon tetrachlorine
0.057
NA
Chloroform
0.046
NA
Hexachloroetttane
0.055
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.056
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.054
NA
filtration.
Incineration.
Incineration.
August 8. 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
» * • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.61
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Bast Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mglt)	As Basis lor Standards	Eltectlve Date*
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
K033 Distillation bottoms from aniline production. Norrwaatewalara
Incineration.
Benzene	6.6
Milne	U
Dlphenytamlne	NA
Sum of Dlphenytamlne and
Dlphenylnltrosamlne	NA
Nitrobenzene	14
Phenol	1.4
Cyclohexaone	5.6
Nickel	30
Wastewaters
Benzene	0.14
Aniline	0.81
Dlphenytamlne	0.52
Dlphenylnltrosamlne	0.40
Sum ol Dlphenamlne and
Dlphenylnltrosmlne	0.40
Nitrobenzene	0.068
Phenol	0.039
Cyclohexanone	0.36
Nickel	0.47
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.088
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1900 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
Augusta. 1988)
Combination ol two or more ol the lollowing:
biological treatment, steam stripping, carbon
absorption liquid extraction and others.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
Augusts, 1988)
K084 Wastewater treatment sludges generated during Nonwastewaters
the production ol veterinary pharmaceuticals
tram arsenic or organoarsenlc compounds. Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
NA
0.79
5.6
NA
Vltrlllcatlon.
Chemical precipitation
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
sort hammer waste as ol
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a solt hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
• • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A4.62
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgfl)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
K08S Distillation or fractionation column bottoms
from the production ol chbrobenzenes.
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
Benzene
4.4
NA
Chlorobonzana
4.4
NA
o-Dkshlorobenzene
4.4
NA
m-Dkshlorobenzene
4.4
NA
pDlchlorobenieiw
4.4
NA
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4.4
NA
1,2,4,5-Tetrachioro-


benzene
4.4
NA
Pentachkmbenzene
4.4
NA
Hexachiorobenzene
4.4
NA
Arociar 1016
0.92
NA
Aroctor 1221
0.92
NA
Aiocior 1232
0.92
NA
Aroctor 1242
0.92
NA
Aroclor 1248
0.92
NA
Aroctor 12S4
1.8
NA
Aroclor 1260
1.8
NA
August 0, 1900 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
Augusta. 1909)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* ' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION « * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS MID EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.63
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waste	Single Orab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used .
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted bf ")
K085 (continued)
Wastewaters
Benzene	0.14
Chlorobenzenm	0.0S7
o-Dlchlorobfizene	0.088
m-Dlchlorobonzena	0.038
p-Dlchlorobonzene	0.000
1,2,4-Trichlombenzene	0.055
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
benzene	0.055
Pentachlorobenzane	0.055
Hexachfombenzene	0.055
Aroclar 1018	0.013
Aroclor 1221	0.014
Aroclor 1232	0.013
Aroclor 1242	0.017
Aroclor 1248	0.013
Aroclor 1254	0.014
Aroclor 1280	0.014
Wastewater treatment5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a aolt hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
• ' • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* • * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * »
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.64
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Ettective Date2
K086 Solvent washes and sludges, caustic washes
and sludges, or water washes and sludges
from the cleaning ol tubs and equipment used
In the formulation ol Ink Irom pigments, driers,
soaps, and stabilizers containing chromium
and lead.
Nonwastewaters


Acetone
160 (0.37)
NA
Acetophenone
0.7
NA
bls(2-ethylhexyl)


phthalate
28 (0.49)
NA
n-Butyl alcohol
2.6 (0.37)
NA
Cyclohexanone
NA (0.49)
NA
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
6.2 (0.49)
NA
Butytbenzytphthalate
7.9
NA
Diethyl phthalate
28
NA
Dimethyl phthalate
28
NA
Dl-n-bvtyl phthalate
28
NA
Dl-n-octyt phthalate
28
NA
Ethyl acetate
33 (0.37)
NA
Ethyl benzene
8.0)031)
NA
Methanol
NA (0.37)
NA
Methyl Isobutyl ketone
33 (0.037)
NA
Methyl ethyl ketone
36 (0.37)
NA
Methylene chloride
33 (0.037)
NA
Naphthalene
3.1 (0.49)
NA
Nitrobenzene
14 (0.49)
NA
Toluene
28 (0.31)
NA
1,1,1 -Trichloro-
5.6 (0.44)
NA
ethane


Trlchloroethylene
S.6 (0.31)
NA
Xylenes (Total)
28 (0.015)
NA
Cyanides (Total)
1.5
NA
Chromium (Total)
NA
0.094
Lead
NA
0.37
Incineration lor organlcs followed by stabilization
for metals.
August 8, 1988 lor chromium
and lead; August 0, 1990, lor
all other constituents
(Treatment standards revised
In Third Third rule and are
ettective August 8, 1990; old
standards ( ) are IneUect as
ol August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' ' *
« • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.6 5
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Dale2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
K086 (continued)
Wastewaters


Acetone
0.28 (0.01S)
NA
Acetophenone
0.01
NA
bls(2-ethythexyl)
0.28' (0.044)

phthalate
NA
n-Butyl alcohol
5.6 (0.031)
NA
Butyfbenzylphthalate
0.017'
NA
Cyckthexanone
.30 (0.022)
NA
1,2-Dlchloroberuene
.088 (0.044)
NA
Diethyl phthalate
0.2'
NA
Dimethyl phthalate
0.047'
NA
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
0.057*
NA
Dl-n-octyf phthalate
0.017'
NA
Ethyl acetate
0.34'10.031)
NA
Ethyl benzene
0.057 (0.01S)
NA
Methanol
5.6* (0.031)
NA
Methylene chloride
0.080' (0.031)
NA
Methyl ethyl ketone
0.28 (0.031)
NA
Methyl Isobutyt ketone
0.14 (0.031)
NA
Naphthalene
0.059* (0.044)
NA
Nitrobenzene
0.068' (0.044)
NA
Toluene
0.080' (0.020)
NA
1,1,1-Trichloroothane
0.054' (0.031)
NA
Trlchloroethylene
0.054* (0.020)
NA
Xylenes (Total)
0.32' (0.015)
NA
Cyanides (Total)
1.0
NA
Chromium (Total)
0.32 (0.32)
NA
Lead
0.037 (0.037)
NA
Concentration-based standards lor organlcs
based on biological treatment, steam stripping,
carbon adsorption, liquid extraction and/or other
wastewater treatment Chromium and lead
standards andlor chromium reduction followed by
precipitation and nitration. Cyanide standards
based on alkaline chlorlnatton.
August 0, 1089 lor chromium
and lead; August 8, 1090, tor
all other constituents
(Treatment standards revised
In Third Third rule and are
effective August 8, 1090; old
standards ( ) are IneHect as
of August 8, 1088)
• • * DRAFT 6/90 ¦ DO NOT CITE Ofl QUOTE
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX Art
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.66
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Was (a	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Dale*
or mg/1)	(orEP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
K087" Decanter tank tar sludge from coking
operations.
Nonwastewaters


Acenaphthalene
3.4
NA
Benzene
0.071
NA
Ctuysene
3.4
NA
Fluoranthene
3.4
NA
lndeno(1,2,3-cdy


pyrene
3.4
NA
Naphthalene
3.4
NA
Phenanthrene
3.4
NA
Toluene
0.65
NA
Xylenes
0.07
NA
Lead NA
0.51

Wastewaters


Acenaphthalene
0.028
NA
Benzene
0.014
NA
Ctuysene
0.028
NA
Fluoranthene
0.028
NA
Indenofl ,2,3-c 


pyrene
0.028
NA
Naphthalene
0.028
NA
Phenanthrene
0.028
NA
Toluene
0.008
NA
Xylenes
0.014
NA
Lead
0.037
NA
Rotary kiln Incineration.
Augusts, 1088
Chromium reduction, chemical precipitation and
Wtratlon ol scrubber water horn rotary kiln
Incineration.
August 8, 1888
* * * DRAFT 6/80 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX Ar4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.67
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Was I a	Single Grab or Comooalta Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "J
noted by*)
K093 Distillation light ends from the production of
phthallc anhydride from ortho-xylene.
Nonwastewaters
Phthallc acid
(Phthallc anhydride)
SB
NA
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Phthallc ackl
(Phthallc anhydride)
0.054
NA
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
K094 Distillation bottoms from the production oi
phthallc anhydride from ortho-xytena.
Nonwastewaters
Phthallc acid
(Phthallc anhydride)
Wastewaters
28
NA
Incineration.
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8 1989
Phthallc acid
(Phthallc anhydride)
0.54
NA
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.68
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Baal Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
' Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Elf active Datez
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
K095 Distillation bottoms from the production of
1,1.1- bkMoroelhane.
Nonwastawatara
1.1.1.2-
Tetrachloroettiane
1.1.2.2-
Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroathane
1.1.2-
Trlchloroottmna
TrkMoroethylmne
HaxaclUomethane
PentacMoroethane
Incineration.
June 8, 1988
9.8
S.8
8.0
8.0
5.8
28
S.8
NA
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
Wastewaters
1.1.1.2-
TetracMoroethane
1.1,2.2-
Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroathane
1.1.2-
Trichloroethane
Trlchioroathylana
Hexachloroethane
Pentachloroethane
Incineration.
0.057
0.057
0.058
0.054
0.054
0.055
0.055
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted <
a soil hammer waste as ot
June 8. 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * •SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * •
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.69
Waste
Coda
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration (or Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
K0B6 Heavy ends Irom the heavy end column from
the production ol 1,1,1- trichloroethane.
Nonwastewatera
Incineration.
Juno a, 1889
1.1.1.2-


Tetrachloroothane
5.6
NA
1.1.2.2-


Tetmchioroettmne
5.6
NA
Tetrachloroethylene
6.0
NA
1.1.2-


Trlchloroothana
6.0
NA
Trichloroethane
5.6
NA
1.3 Dichiorobenzene
5.6
NA
Pentachloroethane
5.6
NA
1.2.4-


Trichlorobmuene
19
NA
Wastewaters


1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-


ethane
0.057
NA
1,1,2,2- Tetrachloro-


athana
0.057
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.056
NA
1,1,2-Trichloro* thane
0.054
NA
Trichloroethane
0.054
NA
1,3 Dlchiorobenzeno
0.036
NA
Pentachioroethane
0.055
NA
1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene
0.055
NA
Incineration.
August 0, 1000 (Restricted as
a sott hammer waste as ol
June 0, 1909)
' • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* • • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 200 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ' *
-------
APPENDIX 4-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.70
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
(Vast*	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Baals lor Standards	Elfectlve Date3
or mg/1)	(or BP, noted
(composite	by
noted by*)
K097 Vacuum stripper discharge from the chlordane
cNorinalor In the production ot chlordane.
Nonwaafwatera
Incineration.
Hexachtoro-



cyclopentadlene
2.4
NA

Chlordane
0.26
NA

Heptachlor
0.066
NA

Heptachlor expoxkle
0.066
NA

Wastewaters


Incineration.
Hexachloro-



cyclopentadlene
0.0S7
NA

Chlordane
0.0033
NA

Heptachlor
0.0012
NA

Heptachlor epoxide
0.018
NA

Nonwastewaters


Incineration.
Toxaphene
2.6
NA

Wastewaters


Incineration.
Toxaphene
0.0095
NA

Augusts, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste es of
June 8. 1909)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8. 1989)
K098 Untreated process wastewater from the
production of toxaphene.
August8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
• * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.71
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg!1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mgll)	(or EP, rutted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
K099 Untreated wastewater from the production of Nonwastewaters	Chemical oxidation using chlorine.	August 8, 1988
2,4-dkMorophenoxyaceito add (2,4-D).
2,4-DlchlorophenaxyaCBtlc
acid
1.0
NA
Hexachktrodlbenzo-


p-dkudna
0.001
NA
Hexachlorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Pentachtorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Wastewaters	Chemical oxidation using chlorine. .	August 8. 1988
2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyacetic
acid 1.0
NA

Hexachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Hexachlorodlbenzo-


furans
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodlbenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodibenzo-


lurans
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodibenzo-


p-dloxlns
0.001
NA
Tetrachlorodlbenzo-
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * •
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " r
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.72
Waste
Coda
Description
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Constituent	Total fmg/kg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards	Effective Datea
turans
0.001
NA
KIOO
K101
Waste leaching solution from acid
Nonwastewaters


Stabilization.
leaching ol emission control




duatlsludge from secondary lead
Cadmium
NA
0.060

smelting.
Chromium (Total)
NA
5.2


Lead NA
0.S1



Wastewaters


For chromium, cadmium chromium reduction




followed by lima and auHlde precipitation lor

Cadmium
1.6
NA
lead. Chemical precipitation loUowed by sludge

Chromium (Total)
0.32
NA
dewaterlng.

Lead 0.81
NA


Distillation tar residues from the distillation ol
Nonwastewaters


VltrlHcation.
anlllne-based compounds In the production of




veterinary pharmaceuticals Irom arsenic or
o-Nltroanlllne
14
NA

organoarsonlc compounds.
Arsenic
NA
5.6"


Wastewaters


Chemical precipitation.

o-Nltroanlllne
0.27 (0.27)
NA


Arsenic
0.79(2.0)
NA


Cadmium
0.24 (0.24)
NA


Lead
0.17(0.11)
NA


Mercury
0.082 (0.027)
NA

August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soIt hammer waste or as no
land disposal as of August 8,
1988)
August 8, 1990
May 8, 1992 (Standards
replace high and low
subcategories from August 8,
1988)
August 8, 1990 Treatment
standards revised In Third
Third rule and are effective
August 8, 1990; old
standards ( ) In eflect as ol
Augusts, 1988)
• " • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE Oft QUOTE *• *
' • ' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ""
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.73
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Eltective Date*
K102 Residue Irom the use ol activated carbon lor
docotorization In the production ol veterinary
pharmaceuticals from arsenic or organoaraentc
compounds.
K103 Process residues Irom aniline extraction from
the production ol aniline.
Nonwastawaters


Vitrification.
o-Nitrophenol
13
NA

Arsenic
NA
5.6

Wastewaters


Chemical precipitation and nitration ol scrubber



water Irom rotary kiln Incineration.
o-nltrophenol
0.028 (0.028)
NA

Arsenic
0.79 (2.0)
NA

Cadmium
0.24 (0.24)
NA

Lead
0.17(0.11)
NA

Mercury
0.082 (0.027)
NA

Nonwastawaters


Solvent extraction followed by steam stripping ol



wastewater and Incineration ol spent solvent
Aniline
5.6
NA
Activated carbon adsorption of steam stripping
Benzene
6.0
NA
ellluent (water).
2,4-Dlnltrophenol
5.6
NA

Phenol
5.6
NA

Cyanides (Total)
5.6
NA

Wastewaters


Solvent extraction lollowed by steam stripping ol



wastewater and Incineration ol spent solvent.
Aniline
4.5
NA
Activated carbon adsorption ol steam stripping
Benzene
0.15
NA
eflluent (water).
2,4-Dinltrophenol
0.61
NA

Nitrobenzene
0.073
NA

Phenol
1.4
NA

May 8, 1992 (Standards
replace high and low
subcategories Irom August 8,
1988)
August 8, 1988 (Treatment
standards revised in Third
Third rule and ere effective
August 8, 1990; old
standards () In ettect as ol
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1988
• * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * " *
1 SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX J W
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND. AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.74
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Waata	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/H	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
K104 Combined wastewater streams generated from Nonwastawatara
nitrobenzene/aniline production.
Solvent extraction followed by steam stripping ol Augusts, 1088
wastewater and Incineration ol spent solvent
Aniline
8.8
NA
Activated carbon adsorption ol steam stripping
Benzene
8.0
NA
affluent (water).
2,4-Dlnltrvphenol
8.8
NA

Nitrobenzene
8.8
NA

Phenol
8.8
NA

Cyanides
1.8
NA

Wastewaters


Solvent extraction followed by stream stripping ol



wastewater and Incineration ol spent solvent.
Aniline
4.5
NA
Activated carbon adsorption ol steam stripping
Benzene
0.15
NA
effluent (water).
2,4-Dlrtltrophenol
0.81
NA

Nitrobenzene
0.073
NA

Phenol
1.4
NA

Total cyanides
2.7
NA

• • • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
1 SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A~4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.75
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (,mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by "j
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
K10S Separated aqueous stream from the reactor
product washing step In the production of
cNorobenzena.
Nonwastewaters


Benzene
4.4
NA
Chloroberuene
4.4
NA
o-DkMorobenzano
4.4
NA
p-Dlchlorobetaene
4.4
NA
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
4.4
NA
2.4,6- Trichlorophenol
4.4
NA
2-Chlorophenol
4.4
NA
Phenol
4.4
NA
Wastewater*


Benzene
O.U
NA
Chlorobenzene
0.057
NA
o-Dlchtorobenzene
0.088
NA
p-Dlchlorobenzeno
0.090
NA
2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol
0.18
NA
2,4,8- Trichlorophenol '
0.035
NA
2-Chlorfiphenol
0.044
NA
Phenol
0.039
NA
Incineration.
August 0, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
Wastewater treatment4
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as oA
June 8, 1989)
• * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION ' *
-------
APPENDIX JH
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.76
Waste
Coda
Description
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Slnala Grab or Composite Sample
Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by *')
noted by ')
Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Baals lor Standards
EltecOve Date2
K106 Wastewater treatment sludges trom the mercury
cell process In chlorine production.
Nonwastewaters
High mercury subcategory (t 260 mglkg)
Treatment technology - masting or retorting
Low mercury subcategory (< 260 mglkg)
Residues trom roasting or retorting
Mercury	NA	0.20
Non-residues
Mercury	NA	0.025
Wastewaters
Mercury	0.030	NA
Roasting or retorting.
Roasting or retorting.
Acid leaching.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1992 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soil hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
K111
Product washwatera from the production ol
dlnltrotoluene via nitration ol toluene.
No BOAT treatment standards promulgated. Land disposal
not sub/ect to soft hammer provisions because waste was
listed as a hazardous waste alter November 8, 1984.
None
K112 Reaction by-product water trom the drying
column In the production of toluenedlamlne via
hydrogenatlon ol dlnltrotoluene.
No BDAT treatment standards promulgated. Land disposal
not subject to soft hammer provisions because waste was
listed as a hazardous waste alter November 8, 1984.
None
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* ' • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.77
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Baals lor Standards	Effective Date*
or mgjl)	(or CP, noted
(composite	by mm)
noted by ')
K113 Condensed liquid light ends from the
production at toluenedlamlne via hydrogenatkm
ol dlnltroluene.
Normastswaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or
tuel substitution.
Incineration or fuel substitution.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1089
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption, or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
K114 Vlclnals from the purification ol toluenedlamlne Nonwastewaters
In the production ol toluenedlamlne via
hydrogenatkm ol dlnltrotoluene.	Treatment technology - Incineration or
tuel substitution.
Incineration or tuel substitution.
June 8, 1980
Wastewaters
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption
or Incineration; or pretreatment (such as
biological treatment or chemical oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
• • ' DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • " *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * "
-------
APPENDIX Ar4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.78
Waala
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis' lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
K115 Heavy ends from the purification ot
toluenedlamlne In the production of
toluenedlamlne via hydroganation of
dlnltrotoluene.
K116 Organic condensate from the solvent
recovery column In the production ot
toluene dilsocyanate via phosgenatlon
ot toluenedlamlne.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or fuel substitution; and
Nickel	NA	0.32
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment-or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration;
and
Incineration or fuel substitution; and
Stabilization (ot metals).
Carbon adsorption or Incineration; and
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
Nickel
0.47
NA
Stablizatlon (ol metals).
Nonwastewatars
Treatment technology - Incineration or
fuel substitution.
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - ciubon adsorption
or Incineration; or pretreatment (such as
biological treatment or chemical oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
Incineration or fuel substitution.
Carbon adsorption or incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
• • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPl..l)IX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND ThIRD THIRD WASTES1
A4.79
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Orab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date
P001
Warfarin, when present at
concentration > 0.3%
P0O2
1 -Acetyt-2-thiourea
P003
Acrolein
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - luel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed Augusts, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
~ * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND. AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.80
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Baals lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by *)
P004
Aldrln
POOS Ally! alcohol
Nonwastewaters
Aldrln
Wastewaters
Aldrln
0.066
0.021
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
lollowad by carbon adsorption
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8. 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as tit
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology (Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation)
lollowad by carbon adsorption; or incineration
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P006 Aluminum phosphide
Nonwastewaters
Technology standard - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
Wastewaters
Technology standard - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY AIM INFORMATION * * *
-------
APf-u..JIXA-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.B1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mgll)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis lor Standards
Eltective Date1
P007 5-(Amlnoethyl)-3- Isoxazolol
POOS 4-Aminopyridlno
P009 Ammonium picrate
Nonwastewalers
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8. 1090 (Restricted as
'a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewatars
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8. 1990 (Restricted i
a soil hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8. 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradatlon; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chemical August 8, 1990
reduction; or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; carbon August 8, 1990
adsorption; bktdegradation; or Incineration.
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * ' *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.82
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
P010
Arsenic acid
P011
Arsenic (V) oxide
P012 Arsenic (III) oxide
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
NA
0.79
5.8
NA
Vitrification.
Chemical precipitation.
NA
0.79
NA
0.79
5.8
NA
Vitrification.
Chemical precipitation.
5.8
NA
Vitrification.
Chemical precipitation.
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
soil hammer waste as ol
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
sort hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
Augusts, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusta, 1988)
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
soil hammer waste as of
August 9. 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
oft hammer waste as of
august 8, 1988)
* * ' DRAFT 6/90 ¦ DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.B3
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
POt3 Barium cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	110
Cyanide (Amenable)	9.1
Barium	NA
NA
NA
52
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorinatlon. Stabilization lor barium.
June 8, 1989; August 0. 1990
lor barium (constituent
restricted for first time In
Third Third rule)
P014 Thlophenol
P01S Beryllium dust
Wastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
Alkaline chlorinatlon.
1.9
0.10
NA
NA
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption;- or Incineration
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wef-alr oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or metal recovery
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or metal recovery
Thermal recovery or metal recovery.
Thermal recovery or metal recovery.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
• * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.84
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by *)
P016 Bls-(chloromethyl) ether
POt 7
Bromoacetona
P018
Brvclne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) fallowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8. 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8. 1090 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical, oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted i
a soft hafnmer waste as of
August 8, 1990)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorptioh; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1990)
* * * DFlM l 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* "SEE REVISED •» H PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.8 5
IVasfe
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mgll)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
P020
Dlnoseb
P021 Calcium cyanide
P022
Carbon disulfide
Nonwastewaters
2-sec-Butyh4,6-
dlnltrophenol
Wastewaters
2-sec-Bulyt-4,6-
dlnitrophenol
Incineration.
2.5
0.066
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	110
Cyanide (Amenable)	9.1
Wastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable)	0.10
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Carbon disulfide	0.014
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorlnation.
Alkaline chtorlnatlon.
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 6, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8. 1986)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
August 8. 1990
August 8, 1990
• * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.86
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	Aa Basis lor Standards
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by
Effective Date2
P023 Chloroacetaldehyde
Nonwaatewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowod by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1900
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed Augusts, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
P024 p-Chloroanlline
P026 1-(o-Chlorophenyl) thiourea
Nonwaslewatera
p-Chloroanlline
Wastewaters
p-Chloroanlllne
16
0.46
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8. 1990
August 8, 1990
Nonwaatewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8. 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted i
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * ¦ *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A4.87
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Data2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
P027 3-Chloropropionltrile
P028 Benzyl chloride
P029 Copper cyanides
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
AuguslO, 1990 (Restricted as
a soil hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as ol
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorinatlon.
June 8, 1989
110
9.1
NA
NA
Wastewaters
Alkaline chtorinaUon.
June 8, 1989
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable) 0.10
NA
NA
* • ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' * *
" * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * " "
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.88
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by ')
P030 Soluble cyanide salts not elsewhere specified Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
110
9.1
NA
NA
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorlnatlon.
June 8, 1089 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1088)
P031 Cyanogen
P033 Cyanogen chloride
Wastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
Alkaline chlorlnatlon.
1.9
0.10
NA
NA
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation;
or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation;
or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation; or
Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation; or
Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; wel-alr oxidation;
or incineration
Chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation; or
Incineration.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
solt hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation;
or incineration
Chemical oxidation; wet-air oxidation; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPtNDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.89
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
2-Cyclohexyl 4,6-dlnitrophenol
P034
P036 Olchlorophanytaralne
P037
Dleldrln
P038 Dlethylarslne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
AugustO. 1900
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8. 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
Dleldrln
NA
0.79
Nonwastewaters
Dleldrln	0.13
Wastewaters
0.017'
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic	NA
Wastewaters
Arsenic	0.79
5.6
NA
Vltrilication.
Chemical precipitation.
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
lollowed by carbon adsorption,5
5.8
NA
Vltrilication.
Chemical precipitation.
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1000 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8. 1988)
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
May 8, 1992
August 8. 1990
• • * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE « * •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.90
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date3
P039
Dlsulloton
P04Q
Diethyl 2-pyrailnyl phosphorothloate
P041
Dlethyl-p-nltrophenyl phosphate
Nonwastewatara
Dlsulloton
Wastewaters
Dlsulloton
0.1
0.017
NA
NA
Incineration.
Biological treatment.
Nonwastewatara
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
Nonwastewatara
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption
or Incineration; or pretreatment (such as
biological treatment or chemical oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Revised from
June 8, 1989 - originally soft
hammer as of August 8,
1988)
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
June 8. 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1B88)
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * ' *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPtnOIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A4.91
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis tor Standards
Effective Date3
P042 Epinephrine
P043 Dllaopropyi Huorophosphate
P044
Dimathoate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-elr oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 0, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewatera
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration
June 8, 1989
Juno 8, 1989
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
• • ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * "
-------
APPENDIX A~4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A4.82
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
. Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TOP (mg/1)	Aa Basis lor Standards	Effective Data2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
P04 5
Thlolanox
P046 alpha, alpha - Dlmethylphenethylamlna
P047
4,6 - Dlnltro-o-cresol salts
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-elr oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
Augusta, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed Augusts, 1080
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 0, 1090
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed Augusts, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
4,6 - Dlnltro-o-cresol 160
Wastewaters
Incineration.
NA
Augusts, 1990
Augusts, 1990
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
4,6 - Dlnltro-o-cresol
0 28
NA
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxldaton) lollowed
by carbon adsorption,5
• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • •
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPt,.~,iX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.93
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by ')
P04B 2.4 ¦ Dlnltrophenol
P049
2, 4 - Dllhlobiuret
POSO
EndosuHan
Nonwastewaters
2, 4 - Dlnltrophenol	160
Wastewaters
2, 4 ¦ Dlnltrophenol	0.12'
AM
AM
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Nonwastewaters
EndosuHan I
EndosuHan II
Endosullan sulfate
Wastewaters
EndosuHan I
Endosullan II
EndosuHan sullate
0.066
0.13
0.13
0.023
0.029'
0.029'
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 0, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as.
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
lollowed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
' ' ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
• * " SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.94
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mgH)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mgll)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
P051
Endrlne
P0S4
Aiiridine
P056
Fluorine
Nonwastewaters
Endrlne
Endrlne aldehyde
Wastewaters
Endrine
Endrlne aldehyde
Incineration.
0.13
0.13
0.0020
0.025'
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
Nonwastewatera
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption: or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
Augusts. 1990
August 8, 1990 (Restricted <
a soft hammer waste aa of
June 0, 1909)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration:	a soft hammer waste as of
Juno 8, 1689)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of compressed gases Into an
absorbing or reacting medium followed by neutralization
Wastewaters
Venting of compressed gases Into an absorbing August 8, 1990
or reacting medium followed by neutralization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990
Fluorine
35
NA
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.9 5
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by**)
noted by *)
P057
Fluoracetamlde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of '
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
P0S8
Fluoracetic acid sodium salt
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as ¦
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
P059 Heptachlor
Nonwastewaters
Heptachlor	0.066
Heptachlor epoxide	0.066
Wastewaters
Heptachlor	0.0012*
Heptachlor epoxide	0.016
NA
NA
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 T6 VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.96
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
P060
Isodrln
Nonwastewaters
Isodrln
Wastewaters
Isodrln
Incineration.
0.066
0.021
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1089)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
P062 Hexaethyltetaphosphate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
P063 Hydrogen cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
Wastewaters
110
9.1
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable) 0.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorlnatlon.
Alkaline chlorlnatlon.
June 8, 1080 (Restricted as'a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1088)
••• DRAFT 6100 ¦ DO NOT CfTE OR QUOTE •**
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.97
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)'
P064 Isocyanlc acid, ethyl ester	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	Augusts, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
* ** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.9B
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/l)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *J
P065 Mercury fulminate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - mercury retorting
(when > 260 mglkg total mercury)
May 8, 1992
Mercury retorting.
Treatment technology • incineration. All nonwastewaters that Incineration,
are not incinerator residues from mercury retorting; regardless
of mercury content.
Mercury (< 260 mglkg mercury
retorting residues	NA
Mercury (< 260 mglkg incinerator
residues)	NA
Wastewaters
0.20
0.025
Acid leaching followed by chemclal preclplatlon.
Acid leaching followed by chemical precipitation.
Chemloal precipitation.	Augusts, 1990
Mercury
0.030
NA
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.99
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
P066 Methomyl
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1984)
P067 2-Methylazlridine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.100
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
P068 Methyl hydrazine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; or Incineration.
Wastewaters.
Treatment technology - Incineration; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; carbon adsorption; or blodegradatlon
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation, chemical
reduction; or Incineration.
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1980)
Incineration; chemical oxidation; chemical	August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
reduction; carbon adsorption; or blodegradatlon. a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P069 Methyllactonltrile
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P070
Aldlcarb
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE** *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.101
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mgfkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P071 Methyl pamthlon
Noriwastewaters
Methyl parathlon
Wastewaters
Methyl parathlon
0.1
0.025
NA
NA
Incineration.
Biological treatment.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1888)
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P072 Alpha-naphthylthlourea (ANTU)
Noriwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treetment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
P073 Nickel carbonyl
Noriwastewaters
Nickel
Noriwastewaters
NA
.032
Stabilization.
Incineration or chemical oxidation.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
Nickel
0.44
NA
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
"¦'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.102
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P074 Nickel cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	110
Cyanide (Amenable)	9.1
Nickel	NA
Wastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable)	0.10
Nickel	0.44
NA
NA
0.32
NA
NA
NA
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline	June 8, 1989
chlorlnatlon for cyanide constituents;
precipitation, settling, filtration, and stabilization
tor metals.
Alkaline chlorlnatlon for cyanide constituents; June 8, 1989
precipitation, settling for metals.
P075 Nicotine and salts
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or cheiplcal
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
P076 Nitric oxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of compressed gases Into an
absorbing or reacting media
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of compressed gases Into an
absorbing or reacting media
Venting of compressed gases Into an absorbing August 8, 1990
or reacting media.
Venting of compressed gases Into an absorbing August 8, 1990
or reacting media.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.103
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P077 p-Nitroanillne
Nonwastewaters
p-NHroaniiine
Wastewaters
p-Nitroanillne
Incineration.
28
0.028
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
P078 Nitrogen dioxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of compressed gases Into an
absorbing or reacting media
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of compressed gases Into an
absorbing or reacting media
Venting of compressed gases Into an absorbing August 8, 1990
or reacting media.
Venting of compressed gases Into an absorbing August 8, 1990
or reacting media.
P081 Nitroglycerin
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; carbon
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1888)
* '* DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.104
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P082 N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
N-Nitrosodlmethylamlne 0.40'
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.'
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P084 N-NitrosomethyMnylamlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P085 Octamethytpyrophosphoramide	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	June 8, 1989
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters	Carbon adsorption or Incineration.	June 8, 1989
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and incineration
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.105
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P087
Osmium tetraoxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or metal recovery
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or metal recovery
Thermal recovery or metal recovery.
Thermal recovery or metal recovery.
May 8, 1092 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990
P088
Enothall
Nonwastewaters
Fuel substitution or incineration. August 8. 1990


Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration



Wastewaters
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8. 1990



by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.


Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical



oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration

P089
Parathion
Nonwastewaters
Parathion
Wastewaters
Parathion
0.1
0.02S
NA
NA
Incineration.
Biological treatment.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * 'SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.106
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P09S Phenyimercuric acetate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - roasting or retorting (> 260 mglkg
total mercury - incinerator residues or mercury retorting
residues)
Treatment technology - Incineration or wastes with organics
and mercury; or roasting or retorting (all nonwastewaters that
are not Incinerator residues or residues from mercury
retorting, regardless ol mercury content).
Mercury (< 260 mglkg residues
from mercury retorting) NA
Mercury (< 260 mglkg incinerator
residues)	NA
Wastewaters
Mercury
0.030
0.20
0.025
NA
Roasting or retorting.
Incineration or roasting or retorlng.
Acid leaching followed by chemical precipitation.
Acid leaching followed by chemical precipitation.
Chemical precipitation
May 8, 1692 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P093 N-Phenylthlourea
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.107
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP. noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by *)
P094
Phorate
Nonwastewaters
Phorate
Wastewaters
Phorate
0.1
0.02S
NA
AM
Incineration
Biological treatment.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P095 Phosgene
P096 Phosphlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.100
Treatment Standards



Maximum Concentration for Any


Waste


Slnale Grab or Composite Sample
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used

Code
Description
Constituent
Total (mglkg
TCLP (mg/1)
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date3



or mg/1)
(or EP, noted





(composite
by")





noted by *)



P097
Famphur
Nonwastewaters


Incineration.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a






soft hammer waste as of


Famphur
0.1
NA

August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters


Biological treatment.
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a






soft hammer waste as ol


Famphur
0.025
NA

August 8, 1988)
P098
Potassium cyanide
Nonwastewaters


Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
June 8, 1989





chlorinatlon.



Cyanide (Total)
110
NA




Cyanide (Amenable)
9.1
NA




Wastewaters


Alkaline chlorinatlon.
June 8, 1989


Cyanide (Total)
1.9
NA




Cyanide (Amenable)
0.10
NA


P099
Potassium silver cyanide
Nonwastewaters


Electrolytic oxidation fallowed by alkaline
June 8, 1989





chlorinatlon for cyanide constituents;



Cyanide (Total)
110
NA
precipitation, settling, filtration, and stabilization



Cyanide (Amenable)
9.1
NA
for metals.



Silver
NA
0.072




Wastewaters


Alkaline chlorinatlon; chemical precipitation for
June 8, 1989; August 8, 1990





silver.
for silver (constituent


Cyanide (Total)
1.9
NA

restricted for first time In


Cyanide (Amenable)
0.10
NA

Third Third rule)


Silver
0.29
NA


* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.109
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
P101
Ethyl cyanide (Propanenltrile)
Nonwastewaters
Ethyl cyanide
(propanenltrile) 360 NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990


Nonwastewaters
Ethyl cyanide
(Propanenltrile) 0.24 NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
P102
Propargyi alcohol
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusta. 1988)
P103
Selenourea
Nonwastewaters
Selenium NA 5.7
Stabilization.
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990


Selenium 1.0 NA


* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.110
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
PI04 Silver cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	110
Cyanide (Amenable)	9.1
Silver	NA
NA
NA
0.072
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorlnation for cyanide constituents;
precipitation, settling, filtration, and stabilization
for metals.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable)	0.10
Silver	0.29
NA
NA
NA
Alkaline chlorlnation; chemical precipitation for
silver.
June 8, 1989; August 8, 1990
tor silver (constituent
restricted for first time in
Third Third rule)
P10S
Sodium azlde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; carbon
adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P106 Sodium cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
110
9.1
NA
NA
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorlnation.
June 8, 1989
Wastewaters
Alkaline chlorlnation.
June 8, 1989
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable) 0.10
NA
NA
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
""¦SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.111
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
P107
Strontium sulfide
Removed from RCRA hazardous waste listings on 10/31188;
No treatment standards promulgated
NA
NA
P108 Strychnine and salts
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) fallowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P109 Tetraethyi dithlopyrophosphate
P110 Tetraethyi lead
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption, or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption and incineration.
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
Nonwastewaters
Lead
Wastewaters
Lead
NA
0.040
0.51
NA
Stabilization (Incineration may be needed when
contaminated with high levels of organlcs).
Chemical oxidation followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.112
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgH)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P111
Tetraethyl pyrophosphate
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
P112
Tetranitromethane
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chemical reduction; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation, chemical
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Fuel substitution, chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; carbon
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
P113
Thallic oxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
Thallium	0.14	NA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.113
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
P11.4 Thallium (I) selenlte
Nonwastewaters
Selenium
Wastewaters
Selenium
NA
1.0
5.7
NA
Stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
PI IS Thallium (!) sulfate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
Thallium	0.14	NA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
P116
Thiosemlcarbazlde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
"¦SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.114
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Dates
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
P118 Trichloromethane-thlol
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
P119 Ammonium vanadate
PI ?0 Vanadium pentoxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • stabilization
Wastewaters
Vanadium	20*
Stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
NA
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - stabilization
Wastewaters
Vanadium	28'
Stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
NA
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED AO CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.115
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Arty
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mgll)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mgll)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
P121 Zinc cyanide
Nonwastewaters
Cyanide (Total)
Cyanide (Amenable)
Wastewaters
110
9.1
NA
NA
Electrolytic oxidation followed by alkaline
chlorinatlon.
Alkaline chlorinatlon
June 8, 1988
June 8, 1989
Cyanide (Total)	1.9
Cyanide (Amenable) 0.10
NA
NA
P122 Zinc phosphide, > 10 percent
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
P123 Toxaphene
Nonwastewaters
Toxaphene
Wastewaters
Toxaphene
1.3
0.0095
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
lollowed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * '
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY AU. INFORM AVON * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.116
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U001 Acetaldehyde
U002
Acetone
U003
Acetonltrlle
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - luel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) tollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Acetone
Wastewaters
Acetone
160
0.28
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air caddatlon)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Acetonitrlle	0.17
Incineration.
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1890 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U004 Acetophenone
Nonwastewaters
Acetophenone
Wastewaters
Acetophenone
Incineration.
9.7
0.010
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
tollowed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* " - DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.117
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by ')
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U005 o-Acetylamlnofluorene
Nonwastewaters
2-Acetylamlno-lluorene 140
Wastewaters
2-Acetylaminofluorene 0.059*
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U006 Acetyl chloride
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U007 Acrylamlde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988);
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.118
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U008 Acrylic acid
U009 Acrylonitrile
U010 Mitomycin C
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
84
0.24
NA
NA
Nonwastewaters
Acrylonitrile
Wastewaters
Acrylonitrile
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.119
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *")
noted by ")
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
U011
Amilrole
U012
Aniline
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1690 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Aniline
Wastewaters
Aniline
Incineration.
14
0.81
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U014
Auramlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
• • * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.120
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U01S
Azaserine
U016 Benz(c)acridine
U017
Benzal chloride
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or cheihlcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1890
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.121
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
U01S Benz(a)anthracene
Nonwastewaters
Benz(a)anthracene
8.2
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U019
Benzene
U020 Benzenesullonyl chloride
Wastewaters
Benz(a)anthraene	0.059
Nonwastewaters
Benzene	36
Wastewaters
Benzene	0.14'
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.3
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.3
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* ** DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* ~ "SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.122
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
U021
Benzidine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or cherfilcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U022 Benzo(a)pyrene
U023
Benzotrichloride
Nonwastewaters
Benzo(a)pyrena
Wastewaters
Benzo(a)pyrena
8.2
0.061
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation,
chromium reduction; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction, carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMAVON * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.123
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U024 Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
U025 Dichloroethyl ether
U026 Chlomaphazine
Bls(2-chloroethoxy)
methane	7.2
Wastewaters
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)
methane	0.036
Nonwastewaters
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 7.2
Wastewaters
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 0.033
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.124
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
' (composite	by **)
noted by *)
U027 Bls(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
Bls(2-chloroisopropyi)
ether
Wastewaters
7.2
Bls(2-chlorolsopropyl)
ether	0.055*
AM
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
U028 Bls(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Nonwastewaters
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 28
Wastewaters
Bis (2-ethyihexyl)phthalate 0.54
Rotary kiln incineration.
June 8, 1989
NA
NA
Concentrations In scrubberwater from rotary kiln June 8, 1989
incineration.
U029 Methyl bromide
Nonwastewaters
Bromomethane (Methyl
bromide	15
Incineration.
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
Wastewaters
Bromomethane (Methyl
bromide	0.11'
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.12 5
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by *)
U030 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
4-Bromophenyl phenyl
ether
15
NA
Wastewaters
4-Bromophenyl phenyl
ether
0.055
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air mddatlon)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
U031
n-Butanol
U032
Calcium chromate
Nonwastewaters
n-Butyl alcohol
Wastewaters
n-Butyl alcohol
Nonwastewaters
Chromium (Total)
Wastewaters
Chromium (Total)
2.6
5.6
NA
0.32
NA
NA
0.094
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Chromium reduction followed by stabilization.
Chromium reduction followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.126
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U033 Carbonyl fluoride	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemlbal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
U034 Trichloroacetaidehyde (chloral)	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
U03S
Chlorambucil
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * 1SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.127
TreatmentStandards
Maximum Concentration for Any
¦Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U036
Chlordane, technical
U037
Chlorobenzene
U038
Chlorobenzliate
0.13
0.0033
Nonwastewaters
Chlordane (alpha and
gamma)
Wastewaters
Chlordane (alpha and
gamma)
Nonwastewaters
Chlorobenzene
Wastewaters
Chlorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Chlorobenzilate	0.1 o'
Incineration.
5.7
0.057
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.3
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Incineration.
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Augusts, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.128
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgH)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
U039 p-Chloro-m-cresol
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
U041
n-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane
U042 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
U043 Vinyl chloride
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Wastewaters
p-Chloro-m-cresol
14
0.018
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,s
August 8, 1990
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment, technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
2-Chloroethyl vinyl	0.057
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
Nonwastewaters
Vinyl chloride
Wastewaters
Vinyl chloride
Incineration.
33
0.27
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.129
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date1
U044
Chloroform
Nonwastewaters
Chloroform
Wastewaters
Chloroform
Incineration.
U045 Chloromethane (methyl chloride)
5.6
0.046
U046 Chloromethyl methyl ether
Nonwastewaters
Chloromethane (methyl
chloride)	33
Wastewaters
Chloromethane (methyl
chloride)	0.19'
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • •
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.130
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
U047 2-Chloronaphthalene
Nonwastewaters
2-Chloronaphthalene 5.6
Wastewaters
2-Chloronaphthalene 0.055*
AM
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or w6t-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U048 2-Chiorophenol
Nonwastewaters
2-Chlorophenol
Wastewaters
2-Chlorophenol
Incineration.
5.7
0.044
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
U049 4-chloro-o-toluidlne, hydrochloride
U050 Chrysene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as ¦
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Chrysene
Wastewaters
Chrysene
Incineration.
8.2
0.059
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.131
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
U051
Creosote
U052 Cresols (Cresyllc acid)
Nortwastewaters


Incineration lollowed by stabilization.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as




a soft hammer wgste as of
Naphthalene
1.5
NA

August 8 1988)
Pentachlorophenol
7.4
NA


Phenanthrene
1.5
NA


Pyrene
1.5
NA


Toluene
28
NA


Xylenes (Total)
33
NA


Lead
NA
0.51


Wastewaters


Incineration lollowed by chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as




a soft hammer waste as of
Naphthalene
0.031
NA

AugustB, 1988)
Pentachlorophenol
0.18
NA


Phenanthrene
0.031
NA


Pyrene
0.028
NA


Toluene
0.028
NA


Xylenes (Total)
0.032
NA


Lead
0.037
NA


Nonwastewaters


Incineration.
August 8, 1990
o-Cresol
5.6
NA


Cresols (m- and p-




isomers)
3.2
NA


Wastewaters


(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
August 8, 1990



lollowed by carbon adsorption,s

o-Cresol
0.11'
NA


Cresols (m- and p-
isomers)
0.77
NA
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.132
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U053 Crotonaldehyde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - luel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemlial oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
1/055
Cumene
Nonwastewaters
Fuel substitution or Incineration. August 8, 1990


Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration



Wastewaters
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990



by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.


Treatment technology - (Wet-air oxidation or chemical



oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration

U0S6 Cyclohexane
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE « * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.133
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U057 Cyclohexanone
!
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or incineration
Wastewaters
Cyclohexanone	0.36	NA
Fuel substitution or incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U058 Cyclophosphamide
U0S9
Daunomycln
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption and Incineration
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * 4
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
A-4.134
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date3
U060
DDD
Nonwastewaters
0,P'-DDD
P.P'-DDD
Wastewaters
0,P'-DDD
P.P'-DDD
Incineration.
0.087
0.087
0.023
0.023
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1980 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U061
DDT
Nonwastewaters


O.P'-DDT
0.087
NA
P.P-DDT
0.087
NA
O.P'-DDD
0.087
NA
P.P'-DDD
0.087
NA
O.P'-DDE
0.087
NA
O.P'-DDE
0.087
NA
Wastewaters


O.P'-DDT
NA
0.0039'
P.P-DDT
NA
0.0039'
O.P'-DDD
NA
0.023*
P.P'-DDD
NA
0.023*
O.P'-DDE
NA
0.031*
O.P'-DDE
NA
0.031
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR'QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.13S
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Bast Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Effective Date2
U062
Diallate
U063 Dibenz o (a.h) anthracene
U064 2,2,7,8-Dibenzopyrene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
NA
NA
Nonwastewaters
Dibenz o(a.h) anthracene 8.2
Wastewaters
Dibenz o(a.h) anthracene 0.055'
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology -(Wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.136
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U066
Dlbromo-3chloro propane
Nonwastewaters
1,2-Dibromo-3-
chioropropane
IS
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters
1,2-Dlbromo-3-
chioropropane
0.11*
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U067
Ethyiene-1,2-dichioro-
Nonwastewaters
1,2-Dibromoethane
(Ethylene dibromlde)
IS
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters
1,2-Dibromoethane
(Ethylene dibromlde)
0.078'
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U088
Dibromomethane
Nonwastewaters
Dibromomethane
15
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
Dibromomethane
0.11'
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 8/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* '¦"SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.137
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U069
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
Nonwastewaters
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
Wastewaters
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
28
0.54
NA
NA
Incineration.
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
U070
o-Dlchlorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
o-Dlchlorobenzene
6.2
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)


Wastewaters
o-Dlchlorobenzene
0.088'
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U071
m-Dichlorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
m-Dlchlorobenzene
6.2
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
m-Dichlorobenzene
0.036
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990
U072
p-Dlchlorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
p-Dlchlorobenzene
6.2
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
p-Dichlorobenzene
0.090'
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990
' * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.138
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mgfkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by"")
noted by *)
U073 Dichlorobenzldene,3,3-
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical.
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted i
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U074
U075
cls-1,4-Dlchloro-2-butene and trans-1,4-
Dichloro-2- butane
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Dlchlorodifluoromethane
Nonwastewaters
Dlchlorodifluoromethane ' 7.2
Wastewaters
Dlchlorodifluoromethane 0.23
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
Augusts, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.139
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U076
1,1 -Dichloroethane
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
U077 Ethane, 1,2-dichloro-
1,1-Dichloroethane	7.2
Wastewaters
1,1-Dichloroethane	0.059'
NA
AM
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Nonwastewaters
1,2-Dlchloroethane	7.2
Wastewaters
1,2-Dichloroethane	0.2l'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U078 Dlchloroethyiene, 1,1-
U079 1,2-Dichioroethylene
Nonwastewaters
1,1-Dlchloroethyiene 33
Wastewaters
1,1 -Dlchloroethyiene 0.025
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption 5
Nonwastewaters
trans-1,2-Dichioroethylene 33
Wastewaters
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.054
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* ' * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.140
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
U080 Methylene chloride
Nonwastewaters
Methylene chloride	33
Wastewaters
Methylene chloride	0.089'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8. 1989)
U081 2,4-Dichlorophenol
Nonwastewaters
2,4-Dichlorophenol	14
Wastewaters
2,4-Dichlorophenol	0.044'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
Augusts, 1990
U082 2,6-Dlchlorophenol
Nonwastewaters
2,6-Dlchlorophenol	14
Wastewaters
2,6-Dlchlorophenol	0.044'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Augusts, 1990
August 8, 1990
U083 Dichioropropane,1,2-
Nonwastewaters
1,2-Dichloropropane 18
Wastewaters
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.85'
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption 5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of '
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * • SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.141
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
U084 1,3-Dlchloropropene
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
U086 N, N-Diethylhydrazlne
cls-1,3-Dlchloropropylene 18
trans-1,3-
Dlchloropropylene 18
Wastewaters
cls-1,3-Dlchloropropylene	0.036*
trans-1,3-
Dichloropropylene	0.036'
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption.5
1/085
1,2:3,4-Diepoxybutane
Nonwastewaters
Fuel substitution or Incineration. August 8, 1990


Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration



Wastewaters
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990



by carbon adsorption; or incineration.


Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical



oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration

Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; fuel substitution; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
reduction; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' ' * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.142
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration (or Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	¦ Total (mg/kg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U087 O.O-Dlethyl-S-methyl dithlophosphate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption and Incineration.
Incineration.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
U088 Diethyl phlhalate
U089 Dlethylstllbestrol
Nonwastewaters
Diethyl phthalate
Wastewaters
Diethyl phthalat
28
0.54
NA
NA
Incineration.
Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - luel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1986)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.143
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or BP, noted
by"J
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
U090 Dlhydrosafrole
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chehilcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
U091 3,3-Dlmethoxybenzldine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
U092 Dlmethylamlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
A-4.144
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Effective Date
U093 Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - ihcineration
Wastewaters
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption?
p-Dimethylamlno-
azobenzone
0.13
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U094 Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene,7,12-
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
QNot-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U095 Dimethyibenzldine,3,3-
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.145
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
U096 a,a-Dlmethyl benzyl hydroperoxide
Nonwastawaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chromium reduction; or Inclneratfon
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradation; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium August 8, 1990
reduction; or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon August 8, 1990
adsorption; blodegradation; or Incineration.
U097 Dlmethylcarbamoyl chloride
Nonwastawaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U098 Dlmethylhydrazlne,1,1-
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chromium reduction; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
reduction; or Incineration.
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradation; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
adsorption; blodegradation; or Incineration. a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * - *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMAVON *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.146
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U099 Dimethyihydrazine.l ,2-
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chromium reduction; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction, carbon August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration.
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U101 Dimethyiphenol, 2,4-
Nonwastewaters
2,4-Dimethylphenol	14
Wastewaters
2,4-Dlmethylphenol	0.036*
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
U102 Dimethyl phthalate
Nonwastewaters
28
Dimethyl phthalate
Wastewaters
Dimethyl phthalate	0.54
NA
NA
Incineration.
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
June 8, 1989
June 8, 1989
* * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.147
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg!1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ")
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U103 Dimethyl sulfate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation,
chromium reduction, or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation, chromium
reduction, or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction, carbon
adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U105 2,4-Dlnltrotoluene
Nonwastewaters
2,4-Dlnltrotoluene
Wastewaters
2,4-Dlnltrotoluene
Incineration.
140
0.32
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wat-alr oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U106
Dlnltrotoluene, 2,6-
Nonwastewaters
2,6-Dlnltrotoluene
Wastewaters
2,6-Dlnltroltoluene
28
0.5 5
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.148
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
U107 Dl-n-octyl phthalate
Nonwastewaters
Dl-n-octyl phthalate
Wastewaters
28
NA
Incineration.
Incineration.
June 8, 1989
June 8. 1989
Dl-n-octyl phthalate
0.54
NA
U108
Dloxane,1,4-
Nonwastewaters
1,4-Dioxane
Wastewaters
1,4-Dioxane
170
0.12
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption *
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U109 1,2-Dlphenyihydrazine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation,
chromium reduction; or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.149
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U110 Dlpropytamine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U111 Dl-N-Propylnltrosamlne
Nonwastewaters
Dl-n-Propylnitrosamine 14
Wastewaters
Dl-n-propylnltrosamlne 0.40
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U112 Ethyl acetate
Nonwastewaters
Ethyl acetate
Wastewaters
Ethyl acetate
Incineration.
33
0.34
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
• * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.1 SO
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Slnole Grab or Composite 'Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mgH)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(orEP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U113 Ethyl acrylate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U114 Ethylenebls-(Dlthlocarbamlc acid)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
QNet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U115 Ehtylene oxide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.151
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by**)
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U116 Ethylene thiourea
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U117 Ethyl ether
Nonwastewaters
Ethyl ether
Wastewaters
Ethyl ether
160
0.12
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption?
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
U118 Ethyl methacrylate
Nonwastewaters
Ethyl methacrylate
Wastewaters
Ethyl methacrylate
Incineration.
160
0.14
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.152
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U119 Ethyl methanesulfonate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemlbal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
U120 Fluoranthene
Nonwastewaters
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
Fluoranthene
Wastewaters
Fluoranthene
8.2
0.068
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)	August 8, 1990
followed by carbon adsorption,5
U121 Trichloromonofluoromethane
Nonwastewaters
Trichloromono-
fluoromethane
Wastewaters
Trichloromono-
fluoromethane
33
0.020
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* •* DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.153
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
U122 Formaldehyde
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
U123
Formic acid
U124
Furan
Nonwastewaiers
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.154
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mgH)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by *)
U1SS Furfural	Nonwastewaters	Fuel substitution or Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or cherrllcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
U126 Qlycldaldehyde	Nonwastewaters	Fuel substitution or Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed Augusts, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
U1S7
Hexachiorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Hexachiorobenzene 37
Wastewaters
Hexachiorobenzene 0.055*
NA
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 9
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.155
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mgH)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U128
Hexachorobutadlene
Nonwastewaters




Hexachorobutadlene
28
NA


Wastewaters




Hexachorobutadlene
0.055*
NA
U129
Lindane
Nonwastewaters




alpha-BHC
0.066
NA


beta-BHC
0.066
NA


delta-BHC
0.066
NA


gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.066
NA


Wastewaters




alpha-BHC
0.00014'
NA


beta-BHC
0.00014'
NA


delta-BHC
0.023'
NA


gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.0017'
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of'
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 3
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.156
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U130 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Nonwastewaters
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
3.6
NA.
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Wastewaters
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
0.057
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption. 5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U131
Hexachloroethane
Nonwastewaters
Hexachloroethane
28
Incineration.
NA
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Wastewaters	(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)	August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
followed by carbon adsorption.5	a soft hammer waste as of
Hexachloroethane	0.055*	NA	June 8, 1989)
U132 Hexachlorophenene	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
* * •" DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------


APPENDIX A-4




TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.157


Treatment Standards


Waste
Code
Description
Maximum Concentration for Any
Slnale Grab or Composite Sample
Constituent Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1) (or EP, noted
(composite by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U133
Hydrazine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation;
chromium reduction; or Incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; carbon adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chemical reduction; carbon
adsorption; biodegradation; or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U134
Hydrofluoric acid
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - venting of gases followed by
neutralization; or neutralization
Venting of gases followed by neutralization; or
neutralization.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)


Wastewaters
Fluoride 35 NA
Venting of gases followed by neutralization; or
neutralization.
Augusts, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U135
Hydrogen sulfide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or incineration
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; or
incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)


Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; or Incineration
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; or
incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.158
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis tor Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U136 Cacodytlc acid
Nonwastewaters
Arsenic
Wastewaters
Arsenic
NA
0.79
5.6
NA
Vitrification.
Chemical precipitation.
May 8, 1992
Augusts, 1990
U137 Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Nonwastewaters
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 8.2
Wastewaters
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.0055'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U138 Methyl Iodide or lodomethane
Nonwastewaters
lodomethane
Wastewaters
lodomethane
85
0.19
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U139
Iron dextran
Removed from the hazardous waste
listing on 10/31188; no treatment
standards promulgated
NA
NA
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.159
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U140 Isobutyt alcohol
Nonwastewaters
isobutyl alcohol
Wastewaters
Isobutyl alcohol
Incineration.
170
5.6
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 19B9)
U141
Isosafrole
Nonwastewaters
Isosfrbie
2.6
NA
Incineration.
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
Isosfrole
0.081
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
U142 Kepone
Nonwastewaters
Kepone	0.13
Wastewaters
Kepone	0.0011
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U143 Lasiocarpine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
* * • DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.160
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U144
Lead acetate
U146
Lead subacetata
Nonwastewaters
Lead	NA	0.51
Wastewaters
Lead	0.040	NA
Stabilization (Incineration may be needed when August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
contaminated with high levels of organlcs).	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Chemical oxidation followe'd by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U145
Lead phosphate
Nonwastewaters
Lead
NA
0.51
Stabilization (Incineration may be needed when
contaminated with high levels of organlcs).
August 8, 1990


Wastewaters
Lead
0.040
NA
Chemical oxidation followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1990
Nonwastewaters
Lead
Wastewaters
Lead
NA
0.040
0.51
NA
Stabilization (Incineration may be needed when August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
contaminated with high levels of organlcs).	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Chemical oxidation followed by chemical
precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8,1989)
U147
Maleic anhydride
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * *SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.161
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standards
Constituent
Maximum Concentration tor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date1
U148 Malelc hydrazide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U149
Malononltrile
U1S0 Meiphalan
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) lollowed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * «
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST. SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Was/a
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.162
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Dembnstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mg/kg TCLP(mgH)	. As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U151 Mercury
Nonwastewaters
High mercury subcategory (>260 mg/kg)
Treatment technology - roasting or retorting
Low mercury subcategory (<260 mglkg)
Residues from roasting/retorting
Mercury
Non-residues
Mercury
Wastewaters
Mercury
NA
NA
0.030
0.20
0.025
NA
Roasting or retorting.
Acid leaching.
Chemical precipitation.
May 8, 1992 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U1S2 Methacryionitrile
Nonwastewaters
Methacryionitrile
Wastewaters
Methacryionitrile
Incineration.
84
0.24
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption*
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.163
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date2
U153
Methane thiol
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U1S4
Methanol
U15S Methapyrliene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
^Net-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Methapyrilene
Wastewaters
Methapyrilene
Incineration.
1. S
0.081
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * • *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.164
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mgfkg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U156 Methyl chlorocarbonate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or cherrilcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
U1S7 3-Methylchol-anthrene
Nonwastewaters
3-Methyicholanthrene
Wastewaters
Incineration.
15
3-Methyicholanthrene 0.0055
AM
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 0, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
U158 4,4-Methylene-bls-(2-chloroanlline)
Nonwastewaters
4,4-Methylene-bis-
(2-chloroaniiine)
Wastewaters
4,4-Methyiene-bls-
(2-chloroaniline)
Incineration.
35
0.50
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oiddation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * «
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.165
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by '*)
noted by *)
U1S9 Methyl ethyl ketone
Nonwastewaters
Methyl ethyl ketone	36
Wastewaters
Methyl ethyl ketone	0.28
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U160 Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide
U161 Methyl isobutyl ketone
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution; chemical oxidation,
chromium reduction; or incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • chemical oxidation; chromium
reduction; carbon adsorption; blodegradatlon; or incineration
Fuel substitution; chemical oxidation; chromium August 8, 1990
reduction; or Incineration.
Chemical oxidation; chromium reduction; carbon August 8, 1990
adsorption; blodegradatlon; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Wastewaters
Methyl isobutyl
33
0.14
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption?
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Qrab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
A-4.166
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U162 Methyl melhacrylate
Nonwastewaters
Methyl methacryiate 160
Wastewaters
Methyl methacryiate 0.14
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U163 N-methyl-n-nltro-n-nltrosoguanldlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U164 Methytthiouracil
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8. 1989)
U165 Naphthalene
Nonwastewaters
Naphthalene
Wastewaters
Naphthalene
Incineration.
3.1
0.059
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.167
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
U166 1,4-Naphthoquinone
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U167 1-Naphthylamlne
U168 2-Naphthlyamlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology • Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed Augusts, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
2-Naphthlyamlne	0.52*
AM
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.168
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U169
Nitrobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Nitrobenzene
Wastewaters
Nitrobenzene
Incineration.
14
0.068
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U170. 4-Nitrophenol
U171 Nltropropane,2-
Nonwastewaters
4-Nitrophenol
Wastewaters
4-Nitrophenol
29
0.12
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1980)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ***
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.169
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgl1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
U172 N-nltroso-dl-n-butylamine
Nonwastewalers
n-nitrosodi-n-butylamlne 17
Wastewaters
n-nitrosodi-n-butylamlne 0.40'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption?
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U173
N-nltroso-dlethanolamlne
Nonwastewaters
Treattnent technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemlcaf oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U174 N-nltroso-diethylamlne
Nonwastewaters
N-nitroso-diethylamlne
Wastewaters
Incineration.
26
N-nltroso-diethylamlne 0.40
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.170
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U176 N-nltroso-n-ethylurea
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U177 N-Nitroso-n-methylurea
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8. 1988
U178
N-nltroso-n-methylurethane
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1889)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED AO CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.171
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by ")
noted by ')
U179 N-Nitrosoplperidine
Nonwastewaters
N-Nitrosoplperidine
Wastewaters
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Incineration.
35
0.013
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or dret-alr oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U180 N-Nitrosopyrrolidlne
Nonwastewaters
N-Nitrosopyrrolidlne 35
Wastewaters
N-Nitrosopyrrolidlne 0.013'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U181
5-Nltro-o-toluidlne
U182
Paraldehyde
Nonwastewaters
5-Nltro-o-toluldine
Wastewaters
5-Nitro-o-toluldine
28
0.32
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.'
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August8, 1990
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.172
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U183
Pentachlorobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Pentachlorobenzene 37
Wastewaters
Pentachlorobenzene 0.055
NA
NS
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption*
Augusts, 1990
August 8, 1990
U184 Pentachloroethane	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) foilowed'by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
U185
Pentachloronltrobenzene
Nonwastewaters
Pentachloronltrobenzene 4.8
Wastewaters
Pentachloronltrobenzene 0.055'
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.173
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgjl)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
ormgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U186 1,3-Pentadiene
Nonwastewaters
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990
U187
Phenacetin
Treatment technology - luel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Phenacetin
Wastewaters
Phenacetin
16
0.081
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
U188
Phenol
Nonwastewaters
Phenol
Wastewaters
Phenol
6.2
0.039
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.9
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as ol
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * *
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Treatment Standards
A-4.174
Maximum Concentration lor Arty
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg!1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U189 Phosphorus sulfide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction, or incineration
Chemical oxidation, chemical reduction, or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation; chemical
reduction; or incineration
Chemical oxidation, chemical reduction; or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U191
2-Plcollne
U192
Pronamide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
Nonwastewaters
Pronamide
Wastewaters
Pronamide
Incineration.
1.5
0.093
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1960 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.175
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgtl)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Dates
or mgll)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by")
noted by *)
U193 1,3-Propane Sultone
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August B, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
Jun e8, 1989)
U194 1-Propanamine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
U196 Pyridine
Nonwastewaters
Pyridine
Wastewaters
Pyridine
Incineration.
16
0.014
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air {ixidation)
followed by carbon Adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
A-4.176
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date1
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by *')
noted by *)
U197 P-Benzoqulnone
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chenilcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
U200 Reserpine
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U201
Resorclnol
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) lollowed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.177
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Arty
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Bgsls for Standards	Effective Date2
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U202 Saccharin and salts
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemikal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U203 Safrole
Nonwastewaters
Safrole
Wastewaters
Safrole
Incineration.
22
0.081
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U204 Selenious Dioxide
U20S Selenium sulfide
Nonwastewaters
Selenium
Wastewaters
Selenium
Nonwastewaters
Selenium
Wastewaters
Selenium
NA
1.0
5.7
NA
Stabilization, vitrification,or recovery.
Chemical precipitation.
NA
1.0
5.7
NA
Stabilization, vitrification or recovery.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.178
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U206 Streptozotocin
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1090 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chenilcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U207
1,2,4,5-totra-chlorobenzene
U208
Nonwastewaters
1,2,4,5-tetra-chiorobenzene
Wastewaters
1,2,4,5-tetra-chiorobenzene
19NA
0.055 NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane
Nonwastewaters
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 42
Wastewaters
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane 0.057
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption *
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* "* DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
A-4.179
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Effective Date2
U209
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
U210 Tetrachloroethylene
U211
Carbontetrachlorlde
U213 Tetrahydrofuran
Nonwastewaters
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 42
Wastewaters
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane0.057'
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
Nonwastewaters
Tetrachloroethylene	5.6
Wastewaters
Tetrachloroethylene	0.056*
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
Nonwastewaters
Carbontetrachlorlde 5.6
Wastewaters
Carbontetrachlorlde 0.057*
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration '
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or incineration
Fuel substitution or incineration
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.180
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Coda	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date1
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U214 Thalllumf I) acetate
U215 Thallium (I) carbonate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
NA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
Thallium
0.14
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
Thallium (I) carbonate 0.14'	NA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8. 1989)
U216 Thallium (I) chloride
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
Thallium (I) Chloride 0.14'	MA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U217 Thallium (I) nitrate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - thermal recovery or stabilization
Wastewaters
Thallium (I) nitrate	0.14'	NA
Thermal recovery or stabilization.
Chemical precipitation.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
* * * DRAffT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.181
Waste
Coda
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration lor Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
ormg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by ')
Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
As Basis lor Standards
Effective Date1
U218
Thloacetamlde
U219
Thiourea
U220
Toluene
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical ¦
oxidation) tollowed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8. 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology ¦ Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
Nonwastewaters
Toluene
Wastewaters
Toluene
Incineration.
28
0.080
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.182
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U221
Toluenediamlne
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration or fuel substitution
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - carbon adsorption or Incineration; or
pretreatment (such as biological treatment or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption or Incineration
Incineration or fuel substitution.
Carbon adsorption or Incineration.
June 8. 1089 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
June 8, 1989 (Restricted as a
soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U222 o-Toluldlne hydrochloride
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U225 Trlbromomethane (Bromoform)
Nonwastewaters
Trlbromomethane
(Bromoform)
Wastewaters
Trlbromomethane
(Bromoform)
15
0.63
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.3
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
Treatment Standards
A-4.183
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date3
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U226 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Nonwastewaters
1,1,1 -Trichloroethang 5.6
Wastewaters
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.054'
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,s
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U227 1,1,2-Trfchloroethane
Nonwastewaters
1,1,2-Trichioroethane 5.6
Wastewaters	I
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.054'
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption,5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U228 Trichioroethylene
Nonwastewaters
Trichioroethylene
Wastewaters
Trichioroethylene
5.6
0.054
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.9
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6/90-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART $68 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND. AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.184
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U234 Syn-trinitrobenzene	Nonwastewaters	Incineration.	August 8, 1990
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters	(Wet-air oxidation or chemfcal oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or incineration.
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carifon adsorption; or incineration
U236 Trypan blue
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.
U237
Uraell mustard
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES1
A-4.18 5
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Waste	Single Qrab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	As Basis for Standards	Effective Date2
or mg/1)	(or EP, noted
(composite	by **)
noted by *)
U238 Ethyl carbamate
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U239 Xylenes
Nonwastewaters
Xylenes
Wastewaters
Xylenes
Incineration.
28
0.32
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption5
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U240 2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyacetlc
Nonwastewaters
2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyacetlc 10
Wastewaters
2,4-Dlchlorophenoxyacetlc 0.72
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
U243 Nexychloropropene
Nonwastewaters
Nexychloropropene	28
Wastewaters
Nexychloropropene	0.035'
Incineration.
NA
NA
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.5
August 8, 1990
Augusts, 1990
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * - SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
Waste
Code
Description
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
Constituent
A-4.186
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mg/1)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mg/1)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U244 Thlram
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology • (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
June 8, 1989)
U246 Cyanogen bromide
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation, wet-air oxidation,
or Incineration
Chemical oxidation, wet-air oxidation, or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation, wet-air oxidation,
or Incineration
Chemical oxidation, wet-air oxidation; or
Incineration.
Augusts, 1990
U247 Methoxychlor
Nonwastewaters
Methoxychlor
Wastewaters
Methoxychlor
0.18
0.25
NA
NA
Incineration.
(Biological treatment or wet-air oxidation)
followed by carbon adsorption.*
August 8, 1990
August 8, 1990
* * • DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
* * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ML INFORMAVON * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-4
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES'
A-4.187
Waste
Code
Description
Constituent
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration for Any
Single Grab or Composite Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Total (mglkg
or mgll)
(composite
noted by *)
TCLP (mgll)
(or EP, noted
by")
As Basis for Standards
Effective Date2
U248 Warfarin (greater then or equal to 3%)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - fuel substitution or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - (wet-air oxidation or chemical
oxidation) followed by carbon adsorption; or Incineration
Fuel substitution or Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted t
a soft hammer waste as of
Augusts, 1988)
(Wet-air oxidation or chemical oxidation) followed August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
by carbon adsorption; or Incineration.	a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
U249 Zinc phosphide (< 10%)
Nonwastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation, chemical
reduction, or Incineration
Wastewaters
Treatment technology - chemical oxidation, chemical
reductions incineration
Chemical oxidation, chemical reduction, or
Incineration.
Chemical oxidation, chemical reduction, or
Incineration.
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
August 8, 1990 (Restricted as
a soft hammer waste as of
August 8, 1988)
* * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR PART 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION '
-------
APPENDIX A-A
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD THIRD WASTES
A-4.188
Thla appendix does not address deepwoll Injoctod wastes. Treatment standards and effective dates lor these wastes are found /n 40 CFR 148. Treatment standards and
effective dates lor multi-source leachate are lound In Appendix A-5. Treatment standards tor mixed radioactive wastes are based on the nonwastewatar treatment standard
lor the hazardous waste; lor the other specific treatability groups lor mixed radioactive wastes, sae 40 CFR 268.
Effective date Is the date the treatment standards take effect lor all First. Second, or Third Third wastes, with the following exceptions: for soil and debris wastes
contaminated with First Third wastes for which BOAT Is Incineration, the effective dale Is August 8, 1990, based on a capacity extension. For soil and debris wastes
contaminated with Second Third wastes lor which BOAT Is Incineration, the effective data Is June 8, 1991, based on a capacity extension. For soil and debris
contaminated with Third Third wastes for which BOAT Is Incineration, mercury retorting, or vitrification, and 'inorganic solid debris,' the effective data Is May 8. 1992, based
on a capacity extension. Until these dates, soli and debris must be disposed of In a unit that meets the RCRA minimum technology requirements.
See 40 CFR 268 Appendix W for recommended technologies to achieve deactivation of these hazardous wastes.
Not applicable.
Detailed information on the basis of wastewater treatment standards by constituent can be found In the document entitled, 'Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology
(BOAT) Background Document for U and P Wastes and Multi-Source Leachate (F039), Volume 1: Wastewater forms of Organic U and P Wastes and Multi-Source Leachate
(F039) for Which There Are Concentration-Based Treatment Standards'
Effective until May 8, 1991. The effective date of final treatment standards for nonwastewaters is being deferred until after this date because of Inadequate high
temperature metals recovery capacity.
Standards do not apply to residues generated as a result of lime (Ca(OH)J treatment that are not classified as hazardous wastes according to 40 CFR 261.3(c)(2)(H),
unless they ere hazardous due to the characteristic of EP toxicity.
Emission control sludges generated as calcium sullate from secondary wet scrubbers using lime neutralization.
9
Emission control sludges that are not generated as a calcium sulfate from secondary wet scrubbers using lime neutralization.
-------

-------
APPENDIX A-5
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES
FOR F039 MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
JUNE 1990
* * DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * *
-------
APPL. X A-8
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 UULV-SOURCC LEACHATE
A4.1
Standards
Uwdrrhsm ConceiibuOon
Waste	tor Am/Sinafa Qrab Sample Best Denxxiatiatad Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLPfmgll)	Aa Bash tor Standards	EBactlve Date'
ormglt)
F039
Multi-Source Leachate
Normraatawatan


Acetone
160
MA*
AeenapMtalene
3.4
NA
AcenapMtana
4.0
NA
Acetophenona
9.7
HA
2-Acetylamlnoffuofene
140
NA
Acryionllrila
84
NA
Aldrtn
0.066
NA
Anttlne
14
NA
Anthracene
4.0
NA
Amclor 1016
0.92
NA
Aroclor 1221
0.92
NA
Aroclor 1232
0.92
NA
Amclor 1242
0.92
NA
Aroclor 1248
0.92
NA
Aroclor 1254
1.8
NA
Aroclor 1260
1.8
NA
alphfrBHC
0.066
NA
betaBHC
0.066
NA
delta-BHC
0.066
NA
gtvnmaBHC
0.066
NA
Benzene
36
NA
Benzo(a}anthracena
8.2
NA
Baruo(b)thioranthane
3.4
NA
B^ruo(k)tluoranthene
3.4
NA
Benzo(g,h,l)peiylene
IS
NA
Banio(a)pyrane
8.2
NA
Bromodichtoromethana
15
NA
Bromolorm
15
NA
Bromomathana (methyl


bromide)
15
NA
btcJnerallon for organic constituents end	May 8,1992
stabilization lor metal*.
• ' ' DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' ' *
'"SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * *
-------
APPENDIX A-8 (continued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F03B MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
A&.2
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration
Waate	for Any Single Qrab Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP(mgl1)	Aa Bash tor Standards	ESocOve Date1
ormgjl)
F039 Multi-Source Leachate (continued)
4-Bromophenyt phenyl
18
NA
ether


n-Butanol
2.6
NA
Butyl benzyl phthalate
7.9
NA
SaeoButyH,


6-dlnttropheno)
2.0
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
&6
NA
Chkxdane
0.13
NA
p-ChioroanBlna
18
NA
Chlorobenzene
5.7
NA
Chktmdlbmmomettiane
16
NA
CMoroetttane .•
8.0
NA
bla-(2-Chloroethoxy)


methane
7.2
NA
bia-(2 Chloroe0ryf) ether
7.2
NA
Chloroform
5.6
NA
bls-(2-Chlorolsopropyt)


ether
7.2
NA
pChloro-nrcresol
14
NA
Chtoromethano
33
NA
2- Chtoronaphthalena
5.6
NA
2-Chktrophenol
5.7
NA
SChknopropene
28
NA
Cluysene
8.2
NA
o-Cresol
5.8
NA
Cresol (m- and p- homers)
3.2
NA
1,2Dlbromo-3Chloro-


propane
IS
NA
1,2-Dlbromoethane (Ethylene

dibromlde)
15
NA
Dibromomethane
15
NA
2,4-Olchlorophenoxyacellc


acid (2,4 D)
10
NA
* • * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ' ' •
"¦'SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX. onttnued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 MULTI-SOURCE UACHATB
A-53
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration
Waste	' for Am Single Grab Sample Bast Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCU> (mgfl)	Aa Basts for Standards	Etfecfoe Date'
ormgll)
F039 Multi-Source Leactiate (continued)
op'-DOD
0.087
NA
p.p'-DDD
0.087
NA
o.p'-DDE
0.087
NA
p.p-DDE
0.087
NA
o.p'DDT
0.087
NA
P0-DDT
0.087
NA
DIbenio(a,h)an]}uocene
8.2
NA
m-DkMorobenzene
6.2
NA
o-DJchloiobenzene
6.2
NA
p-Dlchlorobenzena
6.2
NA
DkMorodUluommethane
7.2
NA
1,1-Dlchloroethane
7.2
NA
1,2-Dlchloroethana
7.2
NA
1, t -DJchtofoeOiytene
33
NA
bans- 1,2-DkMoroetttyiena
33
NA
2,4-Dichlorophartol
14
NA
2.6-D)chlorophenol
14
NA
l.2Dlchloropropane
18
NA
els-1,3Dlchlotopiopone
18
NA
trans- 1,3-DkMoropropene
18
NA
Dteldiin
0.13
NA
Diethyl phthalala
28
NA
2.4-Dbnethyl phenol
14
NA
Dimethyl phthalale
28
NA
Dl-nbutyl phthalale
28
NA
1,4-Dlnltrobenzene
2.3
NA
4,6-Otnltrocresol
160
NA
2,4Dlnltiophonol
160
NA
2,4Dlnltiotoluene
140
NA
2,6- Dlnltiotoluene
28
NA
Dlnocfyt phthalale
28
NA
Dl-npropylnllrosoamlne
14
NA
1,4-Dloxane
170
NA
• ¦ • DRAFT 8190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •
-------
APPENDIX AS (etnttmnd!)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 HUM-SOURCE UACHATB
A-8.4
Treatment Standard*
Maxlfnum Concentration
Waste	tor Any Singh drab Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCW (mglt)	As Basis lor Standards	Effective Data1
ormgll)
F039 Multi-Source Leachata (continued)
Dlsutfoton
8.2
NA
Endosuttan 1
0.066
NA
Endosvtfan 0
0.13
NA
Endosulfan sulfato
0.13
NA
Endrtn
0.13
NA
Endrtn aldehyde
0.13
NA
Ethyl acetate
33
NA
Ethyl benzene
6.0
NA
Ethyl ether
160
NA
bls(2EUiyihexy1) phthatata
28
NA
Ethyl methcrytata
160
NA
Famphur
15
NA
Fluorantheno
8.2
NA
Fluorene
4.0
NA
Fluorotrichloromothano
33
NA
Heptachlor
0.068
NA
Heptachlor epoxide
0.068
NA
Hexachlorobenzene
37
NA
Hexachtofobutadlene
28
NA
Hexachlarocyclopentadlene
4.8
NA
Hexachlorodibanityfurans
0.001
NA
He«achlorodlbemtyp-


dloxlna
0.001
NA
Haxachtoroethana
28
NA
Hexachloropropane
28
NA
lndeno(t,2,3,-c,d) pyrene
8.2
NA
lodomethane
65
NA
Isobutanol
170
NA
Isodtln
0.068
NA
Isosalrole
2.6
NA
Kepone
0.13
NA
MathacrytoniUHa
84
NA
Mothapyrllone
1.5
NA
• • * DRAFT 6190 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
' ' ' SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY AIL INFORMATION
-------
APPENDSt, onttnued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F03$ MtlLTt-SOURCE LEACHATE
MI
	Treatment Standards	'
Maximum Concentration
Waste	lor Any Single Qrab Sample Beat Demonatnted Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TOP (mgll)	Aa Bash lor Standards	Bfecthm Data'
ormgftf
F039 Multi-Source Leachate (continued)
Methoxychlor
0.10
NA
3Methylcholanthrene
15
NA
4,4-Methylene-bla- ¦


(2-chloroanlllna)
39
NA
Methylene chloride
33
NA
Methyl ethyl ketone
38
NA
Methyl tsobvtyt ketone
33
NA
Methyl methacrylate
160
NA
Methyl Parathlon
4.0
NA
Naphthalene
31
NA
p-NHroanlllne
20
NA
Nitrobenzene
14
NA
5-Nltro-o-totuldlne
28
NA
4-NIUophanol
29
NA
NNitrosodlethylamlne
28
NA
NNltroso-dt-nbutyiamtne
17
NA
NNItrosomethyiethyiamkia
2.3
NA
NNItrosomorpholine
2.3
NA
N NItrosoplpeildine
35
NA
NNilrosopynotidlna
35
NA
Parathlon
4.0
NA
Pentachlorobenzene
37
NA
Pentachiorodibenz&turana
0.001
NA
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-


dioxlns
0.001
NA
Pentachloronltrobenzena
4.0
NA
Pontachloroptianol
7.4
NA
Phenacetln
to
NA
Phenanthrena
3.1
NA
Phenol
0.2
NA
Phorate
4.0
NA
Propanenhrile
360
NA
Pronamide
1.5
NA
• • * DRAFT 8/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • • •
• * * SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION •
-------
APPENDIX 4-3 (continued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 MULTI-SOURCE UEACHATB
A-5.9
Waste
Code
Description
Treatment Standard!
Constituent
Maximum Concentration
for Any Single Qrab Sample
Total (mglkg TCLP (mg/1)
ormgll)
Boat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Utod
Am Basis lor Standards	Effective Date1
F039 Multi-Source Leachate (continued)
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safroh
SBimx (2,4,5- TP)
2.4.5-T
f.2.4,B-Tetrachk>fobenzene
Tetrachlorodibenio-turana
Tetrochtorodlbenzo-p-
dloxlna
I,1,1,2-Tebachloroe thane
I,1,2,2- Tetrachtoroethane
Tetrochlomethytena
2.3.4.6-Tetrachtofophonol
Totuona
Toxaphene
1.2.4-Trtchlorobeniene
1.1.1-TricNomethane
1.1.2-Trichktmethane
Trichloroethytene
2.4.5-TtkMorophonol
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol
1.2.3-	Trtchioropropane
1,1,2-Trichloro 1,2.2
trllluoroathane
Vtnyt chloride
Xytane(s)
Cyanides (Total)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Lead
0.2
NA
16
NA
22
NA
7.9
NA
7.0
NA
10
NA
0.001
NA
0.001
NA
42
NA
42
NA
6.6
NA
37
NA
28
NA
IJ
NA
10
NA
5.6
NA
5.9
NA
5.0
NA
37
NA
37
NA
20
NA
28
NA
33
NA
28
NA
1.8
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.23
5.0 (EP)
52
0.066
5.2
0.51
' " ' DRAFT 6/90 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * * *
'"SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX continued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
A-B.7
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration
Waste	lor Any Single Qrab Sample Bast Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgfl)	Am Basis for Standard*	EBectKm Date'
or mg/1)
F039 Multi-Source Leachate (continued)
Mercury
NA
0.025
Nickel
NA
0.32
Selenium
NA
8.T
Silver
NA
0.072
IWBIOIWIWb
Acetone
0.29
NA
Acenaphlhalene
0.059
NA
Acenaphthene
0.059
NA
Acatonftrile
0.17
NA
Acetophenone
0.010
NA
2-Acetytamlnolluorene
0.059
NA
Acrykmltrila
0.24
NA
Aldrin
¦ 0.021
NA
4-Amlnoblphenyl
0.13
NA
Aniline
0.91
NA
Anthracene
0.059
NA
Aroclor 1016
0.013
NA
Aroclor 1221
0.014
NA
Aroclor 1232
0.013
NA
Aroclor 1242
0.017
NA
Aroclor 1248
0.013
NA
Aroclor 1254
0.014
NA
Aroclor 1260
0.014
NA.
alpha-BHC
0.00014
NA
beta-BHC
0.00014
NA
daltaBHC
0.023
NA
gamma-BHC
0.0017
NA
Benzene
0.14
NA
Banzo(a)anttuacene
0.059
NA
Bemo(a)pyrene
0.061
NA
Bemo{b)ltiioranthena
0.055
NA
Biological treatment foOowed by chemical	August 8, 1990
precipitation, wet-air oxidation followed by cartxxi
adsorption followed by chemlca/ predpltaOon.
• • • DRAFT 6190- DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE
• SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •«
-------
APPENDIX A-3 (continuid)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F0S9 MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
A-B.8
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration
Waste	tor Any Single Grab Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mg/kg TCLP (mg/1)	Aa Basis for Standards	Effective Date1
Ormglt)
F039 MuW-Source Leachate (continued)
Benio(g.h,l)peryteno
0.0055
NA
Benzo(k)Buorartthene
0.059
NA
BromodlchloromBthane
0.35
NA
Bromomethane
0.11
NA
4Bromophenyt phenyl
0055
NA
ether


n-Butyl alcohol
5.6
NA
Butyl benzyl phthalata
0.017
NA
2-8ec-Butyl-4,6dlnltro-


phenol
0.066
NA
Carbon tetrachloride
0.057
NA
Carbon disulfide
0.014
NA
Chlordana
00033
NA
p-Chloroanlllne
0.4 6
NA
Chlorobeniene
0.057
NA
Chlorobenzilate
0.10
NA
Chlorodibromomathane
0.057
NA
Chloroethane
0.27
NA
bis (2Chloroethoxy)


methane
0.036
NA
bls(2Chloroethyf) ether
0.033
NA
2Chloroathy1 vinyl ether
0.057
NA
Chlorolorm
0.046
NA
bls-(2Chloioisofxof]yl)


ether
0.05 5
NA
p-Chloro-m-crosol
O.OIB
NA
Chloromethane (methyl


chloride)
0.19
NA
2 Chloronaphthalarte
0055
NA
2-Chlorophenol
0.044
NA
3-Chloropropene
0.036
NA
Chtysene
0.059
NA
o-Cresol
Oil
NA
• * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE * « *
• "SEE REVISED 40 CFR 269 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDn contbtued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F03» UUM-SOUHCE LEACHATE
A8.0
	Treatment Standards	
Maximum Concentration
Waste	tor An* Slnala Orab Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Bash lor Standards	EBecth/e Date1
ormgll)
F039 Muttl Source Leachate (continued}
Cresol (m- and p- Isomers)
0.77
NA
Cydohmanona
0.38
HA
1,2Dlbromo3chk)ro
0.11
NA
propane


1,2-Dlbromoettiane
0.028
NA
DBtromomethane
0.11
NA
2,4-DlchlQrophenoxyaCBtic


acid
0.72
NA
o.p'-DDD
0.023
NA
p.p'-DDD
0.023
NA
o.p'-DDE
0.031
NA
p.p-ODE
0.031
NA
ojt'-DDT
0.0039
NA
p.p'-DDT
0.0039
NA
Dtt>enzo(aJi)anthracone
0.055
NA
m-DkMorobemene
0.038
NA
o-Dlchtomberuene
0.088
NA
p-OkMomberuene
0.090
NA
DlchhrodUhiofomethane
0.23
NA
1,1 -Olchloroethane
0.039
NA
1,2Dlchloroethane
0.21
NA
1,1-DlcMoroethytene
0.029
NA
trans- 1,2-DhMoroethene
0.054
NA
2,4-OhMorophenol
0.044
NA
2.8-DkMorophenol
0.044
NA
1,2 DIcNoropropane
0.85
NA
cls-1,3Dlchloropropene
0.038
NA
trans-1,3 DkMoropropene
0.038
NA
DMdrin
0.017
NA
Diethyl phthalata
0.20
NA
pDlmethylamlnoaio-


benzene
0.13
NA
2,4-Dlmelhyt phenol
0.038
NA
• * * DRAFT 6190-DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE* * *
•" SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
APPENDIX A-5 (continued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AMD EFFECTIVE OAVES FOR RU» UULTt-SOURCE IEACHA1E
A-8.10
Treatment Standardt
Maximum Concentration
Waste	tor Any Single Grab Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatmant Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	As Baals for Standards	Effective Date'
or mgll)
F039 MultLSource Leachate (continued)
Dimethyl phthalate
0.047
NA
Dl-n-butyl phthalate
0.057
NA
1,4-Dlnitrobenzane
0.32
NA
4.6-DtnHrocresot
0.2B
NA
2,4-DtoHrophenol
0.12
MA
2,4-DbiHrohiene
0.32
NA
2,6-Dlnttrotoluene
0.55
NA
Df-noctyi phthalate
0.017
NA
Dl-n-propytnltrosoamlne
0.40
NA
1,2Dlphenyl hydrazine
0.087
NA
1,4-Dktxane
0.12
NA
Dlsulloton
0.017
NA
Endosullan 1
0.023
NA
Endosutfan tt
0.029
NA
Endosullan sulfate
0.029
NA
Endrin
0.0028
NA
Endrtn aldehyde
0.029
NA
Ethyl acetate
0.34
NA
Ethyl benzene
0.057
NA
Ethyl cyanide
0.24
NA
Ethyl ether
0.12
NA
bls-(2Ethylhexyl) phthalate
0.20
NA
Ethyl melhacrylate
D.14
NA
Ethylene oxide
0.12
NA
Famphur
0.017
NA
Fluoranthene
0.06 a
NA
Fluorene
0.059
NA
Heptachlor
0.0012
NA
Heptachlor epoxide
0.016
NA
Hexaclilorobenzene
0.055
NA
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.055
NA
Hexachlorocyiopentadlane
0.057
NA
Hexachlorodibenzo lurans
0000063
NA
• * * DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE • ' •
"'SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * •
-------
APPENDIX. onUmud)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 UULH-SOURCE LEACHATE
AB.lt
Treatment Standards
Maximum Concentration
Waste	for Any Single Grab Sample Best Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	Aa Baala lor Standards	EBacthre Date'
or mg/t)
F039 Uuttt-Source Leachate (continued)	Nexachtorodlbenzo-p-
dfaxfris
0.000063
NA
Haxachtofoethane
0.055
NA
Hexachloropropena
0.035
NA
tndeno(1,2,3,c,d)pyrene
0.0055
NA
lodomethane
0.10
NA
tsobutyl alcohol
5.6
NA
Isodrin
0.021
NA
tsosatrole
0.081
NA
Kepone
0.0011
NA
Methacrylonlbile
0.24
NA
MethapyrUene
0.001
NA
Methoxychlor
0.23
NA
3-Methylchloanthiena
0.0055
NA
4,4 Methylene-bla-


(2-chkiroanlllrte)
0.50
NA
Methylene chloride
0.009
NA
Methyl ethyl ketone
0.28
NA
Methyl tsobutyl ketone
0.14
NA
Methyl methaciyiate
0.14
NA
Methyl methansul/onate
0.018
NA
Methyl Paratlilon
0.014
NA
Naphthalene
0.059
NA
2Naphthytamlne
0.52
NA
p-Nltroanttine
0.028
NA
Nitrobenzene
0.068
NA
5- Nitro- o- tohildine
0.32
NA
4-NUrophenol
0.12
NA
NNItrosodlethylamlne
0.40
NA
NNitroso-dlnbutylamlne
0.40
NA
NNitrosomethytethytamlne
0.40
NA
NNItrosomorpholine
0.40
NA
N Nitrosopipeiidine
0.013
NA
¦ • " DRAFT 6/90 DO NOT Cm OR QUOTE * * •
•"SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • •
-------
APPENDIX A-5 (contimiid)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR FO39 MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
A-5.12
Treatment Standards
JMax/fnu/ii Concentration
Waste	for Any Single Qtab Sample Beat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP fmg/1)	As Baste lor Standards	Effective Oats'
ormg/1)
F038 Multi-Source Leachale (continued)
N-NltrosopyrroUdlne
0.013
NA
Paruthlon
0.017
NA
Penlachkmbemane
0.055
NA
Pentachlorodlbenzfr turana
0.000035
NA
PentacNomdlberuo-p-


dloxina
0.000083
NA
PentacMoronHrabeniena
0.055 ¦
NA
PentatMorophenol
0.089
NA
Ptianacetin
0.081
. NA
Penanthrene
0.059
NA
Phenol
0.039
NA
Phorate
0.021
NA
Pronamlde
0.093
NA
Pyrene
0.067
NA
Pyridine
0.014
NA
Safrote
0.081
NA
Sihrox (2.4,8-TP)
0.72
NA
2.4.&T
0.72
NA
1,2,4,5- Totrachhrobentene
0.055
NA
Tatrachlorodlbenityfurnns
0.000063
NA
Tetrochlofodibenz&fr


dloxina
0.000063
NA
2,3,7,8- TetracNorodlbeMO-


p-dloxln
0.000063
NA
1,t,t,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.057
NA
1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroeiltane
0.057
NA
Tetrachloroethene
0.058
NA
2,3,4,6- Tatraclitorophenol
0.030
NA
Toluene
0.080
NA
Toxaphane
0.0095
NA
Tribromomethane


(bromolorm)
0.63
NA
1,2,4 Trlctiloroboniana
0.055
NA
• " ' DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE - * •
* • • SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • * •
-------
APPENDIX continued)
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOft F039 MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE
At 19
	Treatment Standards	
Maxt/num Concentration
Waste	for Arty Slnola Grab Sample Boat Demonstrated Treatment Technology Used
Code	Description	Constituent	Total (mglkg TCLP (mgll)	Aa Basis lor Standards	Ettecthm Date1
ormglt)
F039 MiM-Source Leachate (continued)
1,1,1-TricMoroethano
0.054
NA
1,1,2-TrUMoroettiane
0.054
NA
TrkMoroethene
0.054
NA
Trlchloromonolluoro-
0.020
NA
methane


2,4,5-Trichlorophonol
0.19
NA
2,4,6-TrUMorophenol
0.035
NA
1,2,3-Trichloroptopani
0.85
NA
1,1,2-TricNoro-1,2,2-


trtlluoroethana
0.057
NA
Vinyl chloride
0.27
NA
Xylane(s)
0.32
NA
Fluoride
35
NA
Sulfide
14
NA
Antimony
1.9
NA
Arsenic
5.0
NA
Barium
1.2
NA
Beryllium
0.82
NA
Cadmium
0.20
NA
Chromium (Total)
0.37
NA
Copper
1.3
NA
Lead
0.28
NA
Mercury
0.15
NA
Nickel
0.55
NA
Selenium
0.82
NA
Silver
0.29
NA
Vanadium
0.042
NA
Zinc
1.0
NA
' • 'DRAFT 6190-DO NOT CITt OR QUOTE* ••
'"SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION • • *
-------
APPENDIX A-S
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND EFFECTIVE DATES FOR F039 MUM-SOURCE LEACHATE
A-5.14
End Wolii
1.	Effective date Is the date treatment standard* taka effect lor F039 wastes. For F039 nonwastewatan, EPA has grunted a two-year national capacity variance. For FOX wastewaters, EPA haa
granted a three month national capacity variance. UntB the effective dates, these wastes muat be disposed ctbia vnlt that meets the RCRA mtntmurn technology requirement*.
2.	Not applicable.
3.	AB wastewater treatment standards are based on composite samples.
• * * DRAFT 6190 - DO NOT CITE Oft QUOTE * * *
•"SEE REVISED 40 CFR 268 TO VERIFY ALL INFORMATION * * *
-------
-------
United Statas	Office of	Directive: 9347.3-01 FS
Environmental Profcaor Said Warn and	July 1989
Agency	Emergency neaporee
¦ftEPA Superfund LDR Guide #1
Overview of RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs)
Hie Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
• • PI* 98-616, signed on November 8, 1984 - • indnde specific provisions restricting the land disposal of RCRA
hazardous wastes. The purpose of these HSWA provisions is to ™the potential of future risk to human health
and the environment by requiring the treatment of hazardous wastes prior to their land disposal. This guide
summarizes m^i°f components of the land disposal restrictions (LDRs), outlines the types of restrictions
Imposed, and presents the compliance options specified In the regulation. Other Superfund LDR Guides are listed
at the end of this guide. More detailed guidance on Superfund compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
DEFINITION OF LAND DISPOSAL
The LDRs place restrictions on the land disposal
of RCRA hazardous wastes. The definition of land
disposal (or "placement,* which is synonymous with
land disposal") under RCRA includes, but is not
limited to:
any "placemen?" of hazardous waste in a landfill,
surf act impoundment, waste pile, injection weS,
land treatment faaEty, salt dome formation, salt
bed formation, underground mine or cave, and
concrete bunker or vault (RCRA §3004(k))
The LDRs apply only to RCRA hazardous wastes
that are land disposed or placed. They do not apply
to wastes that are discharged to surface waters (where
National Pollutant Discharge FHnrination System
(NPDES) requirements apply) or to Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (where pretreatment requirements
apply). The LDRs also do not apply to contaminated
ground water treated and supplied directly to
households (where Maximum Contaminant Levels
(MCLs) generally apply).
It is important to note that the LDRs apply
prospectively to wastes that are land disposed after the
effective date of the restrictions (La, the LDRs do
not require that wastes land disposed prior to the date
of the restrictions be removed and treated).
STATUTORY DEADLINES
HSWA (Greeted EPA to establish treatment
«rawHarrU for each of seven groups of RCRA
hazardous wastes by specific dates. These dates,
referred to as statutory deadlines, will eventually
restrict land disposal of all RCRA hazardous wastes,
as shown in Highlight L
Highlight h LDR STATUTORY DEADLINES

Grittnia Lkt W«te*
ttainwVbM
Cootririnfc nd QJMobui
Lta Sad ad Debs Ran
GBRfOA/KOtA Gaaeeriw
Second ThM Wata
TkUTbUVett
Nartjr Mi illffcil
8, 1986
JtalyS, 1S87
; 8,19B8
3, 1988
-------
The statutory	« are important because they
are the on which RCRA wastes become
"restricted," afrhnngh EPA has the authority to restrict
a waste before its statutory dftwflinn. For example, the
Agency has restricted certain Second Third wastes in
the First Third role and certain Third Third wastes in
the June 1989 Second Third rule.
STATUTORY WASTE CATEGORIES
The first category of wastes (refer to Highlight 1)
includes: the P001-F005 spent solvent-containing RCRA
wastes and the F020-FQ23 and FQ26-P028 diaxm-
/fmfgfnfng RCRA wastes. Hie second category, the
California list wastes, is a distinct category of RCRA
hazardous wastes described further in Superfund LDR
Guide #2. The three categories of scheduled wastes
(L&, First Third, Second Third, Third Third wastes)
at!	and flwwrtffitfg	wastes
identified as of November 8, 1984 (errinrftng the
solvent and dioim wastes mentioned above). EPA
ranked the scheduled wastes based on their toxicity
and volume and placed the highest taaaaty/volume
wastes in the "First Third.' Soil and debris (see
Highlight 2) contaminated with spent solvent' or
ami California list wastes generated
dining CERCLA response and RCRA corrective
actions were given a separate statutory dftarilinr.
Finally, wastes newly identified or listed after 1984
must have standards set within six months of their
idwifififatiftii iin» (or earlier if EPA promulgates the restriction
ahead of schedule). On that date, one of four types of
restrictions will apply:
L Tn-afm^nf rttnAarA* EPA may set one of three
types of treatment standards for restricted wastes:
¦	A concentration level to be achieved prior to
disposal (the most common type of treatment
standard);
¦	A specified technology to be used prior to
disposal; or
¦	A "no land disposal" designation when the
waste is no longer generated, is totally recycled,
is not currently being land disposed, or no
residuals are produced from treatment
All three types of treatment standards are
established based on the best demonstrated available
technology (BDAT) identified for that waste.
1	r-rhnofagy requirements during a national
capacity extension: When EPA sets a treatment
standard, it may grant a national capacity extension
(for up to two years) if sufficient treatment capacity
is not available for that waste. During a national
capacity extension, the treatment standards set for
a waste do not have to be met However, if wastes
that do not meet the standards are disposed of in
a landfill or surface impoundment the receiving unit
must meet the RCRA minimum technology
requirements (Le., double liner, leachate collection
system,, and ground-water monitoring).
When EPA sets treatment standards for Third Third
wastes in May 1990, it may grant a national capacity
extension, but only for up to two years. Therefore,
by May 1992, all national capacity extensions will
have expired. The only exception may be if EPA
grants an extension when it sets treatment standards
for newly identified wastes. Superfund LDR Guide
#3 provides additional information on the minimum
technology requirements.
3. Soft tiaimnw festricfirmv If EPA fails to set a
treatment standard for a First or Second Third
Highlight 2: DEFINITIONS OF SOIL AND
DEBRIS
Soil is defined as materials that are
primarily of geologic origin such as sand, alt,
loam, or day that are indigenous to the natural
geological environment at or near the
CERCLA site. (In many cases, sdl is mixed
with liquids, sludges, and/or debris.)
Debris is defined as materials that are
primarily non-geologic in origin such as grass,
stumps, aw^ man-made	as
concrete, clothing, partially buried whole or
empty drums, capacitors, and other synthetic
fnawnfartrtrrng ifwn« SUCfa 3S linCTS. (It dOCS
not indudc synthetic organic chemicals, but
may rncfrnfo marwial* mwramnntwl with these
chemicals.)
-------
waste by its statutory deadline, soft hammer
restrictions apply. The soft iwmiw requirements
place the following restrictions on the disposal of
m	and surface impoundments:
¦	Hie receiving unit most meet minimum
technology requirements; and
¦	Site managers (OSCs, RFMs. as generators)
most determine if treatment is practically
available. If treatment is practically available, the
site """ff most use the best practically
available treatment to treat wastes before
disposal; if treatment is not practically available,
the wastes may be disposed of without
treatment
Land disposal in other types of units, such as land
treatment units and waste piles, is £St restricted
under soft hammers, although an LDR notification
will be required for actions involving o&site
Hwpncil jn SUCh nni»t.
Soft	restrictions remain in effect until
EPA sets a treatment standard, or until May 1990,
when the hard	restrictions become
effective.
H»tA	restrictions: If EPA fails to set a
treatment standard by the statutory deadlines for
Solvent*	aw A California lift
wastes, or by May 8,1990, for any of the scheduled
wastes, the hard hammer restrictions prohibit all
land disposal of the affected waste until a
treatment standard is promulgated. To date, the
hard hammer has only fallen for certain California
list wastes.
Superfund LDR Guide #4 provides more
Mifftrmghftw gg flgft anH hard hammer restrictions.
LDR COMPLIANCE OPTIONS
EPA rrrognirai that not all wastes can be treated
to the LDR treatment «*a«Hai^jg ami that alternative
treatment standards	of ImH disposal may
provide significant reduction m the toxicity, mobility, or
volume of wastes and be protective of hmT"rn health
and the environment. The LDRs, therefore, provide
the following compliance options to meeting the
restrictions discussed above.
¦ Treatabffitv Variance: This notion a available when
EPA has set .a treatment standard as a
concentration level, but because a generator's waste
differs significantly from the waste used to set the
standard, the promulgated treatment standard cannot
be met Q£ the BDAT technology is inappropriate for
that waste. (For the purposes of the LDRs,
CERCLA site managers are considered generators
of hazardous waste.) Under a Treatability Variance,
EPA approves an alternate treatment standard that
must be met before that waste can be land
disposed. Superfund LDR Guides #6A and #6B
provide more information for obtaining Treatability
Variances for remedial and removal actions.
¦	Equivalent Treatment Method Petition: This option
is available when EPA has set a treatment standard
that is a meafied technology (e^, incineration).
Generators may use a different technology (e.g.,
chemical treatment) if they can demonstrate that
this technology will achieve a measure of
performance equivalent to that of the specified
technology.
a No Migration Petition: This option may be used to
meet any of the four types of LDR restrictions.
Under this option, generators may land dispose
wastes that do not meet the LDR restrictions if
.they can demonstrate there will be "no
migration" of hazardous constituents above health-
based levels from the disposal unit or injection zone
for as long as the wastes remain hazardous.
¦	Delisting. This option may be used to demonstrate
that a waste is unhazardous and, therefore, not
subject to any of the RCRA Subtitle C hazardous
waste regulations, including the LDRs. Delisting
only applies when the CERCLA waste is a listed
RCRA hazardous waste. (Characteristic wastes
need not be delisted, but they can be treated to no
longer exhibit the characteristic.) Generators must
demonstrate that: (1) the waste does not meet any
of the criteria for which the waste was listed as a
hazardous waste, and (2) other factors (including
additional constituents) do not cause the waste to
be hazardous.
Hie LDRs also permit a case-by-case extension of
up to two years, which allows a site-specific extension
of the effective date if a generator has a binding
contractual commitment for treatment capacity and can
show that no capacity currently exists anywhere in the
United States. This option, however, is generally not
appropriate for Superfund response actions.
SOIL AND DEBRIS WASTES
As rtiynwd earlier, the LDRs apply to soil and
debris when they are contaminated with a restricted
RCRA hazardous waste. Because of^the complex
-------
nature of many soil and debris matrices (as compared
with the industrial process wastes upon which the LDR
treatment standards were based), it may be difficult to
meet these standards for wastes mixed with soil and
debris. Consequently, the Agency is undertaking a
rulemaking that will set LDR treatment standards
specifically for soil and debris. Until that rulemaking
is completed, however, site managers may need to
obtain a Treatability Variance for actions addressing
contammatrd soil and debris.
OTHER LOR REQUIREMENTS
In addition to the four types of restrictions
described above, the LDRs also include the following
requirements:
¦	Storage Prohibition: The LDRs prohibit the
storage of restricted wastes (including soft hammer
wastes) unless storage is solely for the purpose of
g
-------
Urtttad Sons	Office of	Directive: 9347.3-02FS
Envlreniiantal Protection Solid Waste and	July 1989
AQancy	Emergency Response	
¦ftEPA Superfund LDR Gulde #2
Complying With the California
List Restrictions Under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
specific restrictions on the land disposal of RCRA hazardous wastes. California list wastes are a distinct
category of RCRA hazardous wastes that are restricted under the land disposal restrictions (LDRs). This guide
HffluM the California list wastes, summarizes their respective restrictions, and discusses their potential overlap with
other LDR treatment standards. More detailed guidance on California list waste restrictions and Superfund
MwnpKaww» with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
DEFINITION OF CALIFORNIA LIST WASTES
To be damnified as a California list waste, three
conditions must be met:
(1)	""¦» —— "¦"» a
waste;
(2)	The waste must be a liquid (Le^ it fails method
9095 Paint Filter Liquids Test [PFLT]), except for
Haloaenated Qm™ rnriin0™^ (HOCs^. which
may be liquid or non-liquid; and
(3)	The waste must exceed statutory prohibition levels
for specified constituents.
The types of wastes that may be California fist
wastes are: free cyanides, certain «¦«—»«, corrosive
wastes, PCBs, and HOCs. (HOCs are compounds
wrofainitig mhnu «wl ( halOgBB,	S] fluorine,
chlorine, bromine,	«wi aerating in their
molecular formula). Hie Agency has limited the
restricted HOCs to approximately 100 HOCs fisted in
Appendix m to 40 CFR Part 268. These restricted
HOCs mdude solvents, pesticides, PCBs, and dicixms.
These hazardous wastes are referred to as
California fist wastes because the State of California
developed regulations to restrict the land disposal of
wastes rrmtaming these constituents, and Congress
subsequently incorporated these provisions into the
1984 HSWA amendments to RCRA. Even if LDR
treatment standards have not been promulgated for
certain RCRA wastes (e£, Third Third wastes), these
wastes may be subject to California list restrictions.
If the Agency has promulgated a treatment standard
for a California list hazardous waste, the waste must
attain »haf treatment standard before disposal. If
the Agency has not set a treatment standard, the waste
must be treated to below the prohibition level (or
rendered non-liquid if a non-HOC waste) before it
may be land disposed.
CALIFORNIA LIST LDR RESTRICTIONS
The Agency has promulgated treatment standards
for PCB-confaining wastes and HQC-containing wastes
(except for dilute HOC wastewaters). The treatment
standards for PCBs and some HOCs became effective
on July 8, 1987.
The Agency has not set treatment standards for
the remaining California list wastes. Instead, the
Agency codified the statutory prohibition levels for
corrosive wastes and dilute HOC wastewaters and
allowed the hard hammw provisions to take effect for
free cyanides and California list metals. The
prohibitions on these wastes became effective on July
8,1987. The effects of these restrictions are the same:
prohibiting the land disposal of these wastes above the
prohibition levels.
Based on a finding of inadequate treatment capacity,
EPA granted a nationwide extension to the. effective
date for treating California list HOC wastes until July
8, 1989. The Agency subsequently rescinded the
variance, and the restriction for HOC wastes became
effective November 8, 1988. The Agency also granted
-------
an citcns'on of the effective date for HOC-containiiig
soil aad debris wastes until July 8, 1989, for sofl and
debris wastes not from CERCLA/RCRA corrective
actions, and until November 8,1990, for soil and debris
wastes from CERCLA/RCRA corrective actions.
California list wastes granted a national capacity
variance from the treatment standards may be disposed
of in a landfill or surface impoundment only if the
receiving unit complies with minimum technology
requirements (See Superfund LDR Guide #3). The
prohibition levels, treatment standards, and effective
dates for the California list wastes are presented in
Highlight 1.
OVERLAP WITH OTHER TREATMENT STANDARDS
As noted earlier, wastes most be RCRA listed or
characteristic wastes to be California list wastes.
Therefore, California list wastes may also be restricted
as solvent- or dioxm-containing wastes or as scheduled
wastes. For wastes covered by more than one LDR
standard, the LDR restriction* for the more specific
waste stream generally take precedence, once the
standard is promulgated. For example, P006 non-
wastewaters may be restricted under the California list
rule became the waste is a liquid and may contain
nickel above the statutory prohibition leveL The F006
treatment standard, which is expressed as a
concentration level, however, takes precedence over the
California list restriction (Le, codified prohibition
level).
The Agency has determined that soft hammer
wastes and wastes for which national capacity variances
have been granted remain subject to California list
prohibitions (i-c, if either of these waste types is
subject to a California list treatment standard or
statutory prohibition level, that treatment standard or
statutory level must be met before the waste can be
land disposed). If a California list treatment standard
is promulgated for a soft hammer waste, the more
stringent of the restrictions apply. For example, if a
non-liquid soft	waste contains 1,100 mg/kg
total HOCs, the waste most meet the California list
treatment standard of incineration or burning in a
boiler or industrial furnace before land disposal If a
liquid soft hammer waste contains 510 mg/1 lead (for
which no California list treatment standard exists), the
soft hammer restrictions apply. If treatment is not
available, the waste must at least be treated below the
prohibition level (Le^ 500 mg/1) or rendered non-liquid
and can only be disposed of in a surface impoundment
or lawHfin if the receiving nT"f meets minim i«n
technology requirements or has an equivalent waiver.
mgfcUgfc* 1 . PROHIBITION LEVELS AND TREATMENT STANDARDS
FOR CALIFORNIA LIST WASTES
ftHfiwU Lirt '
''"•"-I*"—*
frnhiWtla UwT
Stanriara*
Z£taetlva Data
7m Cyanlrt—
MaUds
Araaaic
Cadmium
Chronlta VI
Laad
Mascuzy
Hickal
SalmlisB
> 300 ppa
> SO ppa and < 300 ppa
Diluta Waatawatari
(<10,000 ag/kg)
Han-BiLuta Hutimtnt
and Ren-Liquids
Hpn-BCBA/CERTLA Soil
and Dabria
BCSA/CEBOA Soil and
Dabria
1000 os/L
300 ag/1
100 ag/1
300 ag/1
300 ag/1
20 og/1
134 ag/1
100 as/1
130 as/1
pfl < 2.0
30 ppa
30 ppa
(BOCa)
1000 ag/kg
1000 ag/kg
1000 at/kg
1000 ag/kg
— hard baaaar
BOSK — hard fcaanar
SOHX — Codifiad
prohibition lavala
XBCXBZBAXX0H aa ipael-
£iod tmdar TSCJL.
99.99991 DBS
IIHilHBKATIOH OK THZBMAL
DESTHDCTIOH is Boilar,
99.99991 DBS
BOSS — Coditlad
prohibition lavala
zscnmrioB 99.991 dbz
UCIHEHATIOH 99.99* ORE
xwcnrgRATica 99.99s drx
July S. 1987
July a, 1987
July 8.	1987
July 8,	1987
July 8.	1987
July 8,	1987
Nov. 8,	1988
July 8.	1989
How. 8.	1990
-------
CERCLA section 121(d)(2) requires that Superfund response actions comply with other environmental laws chat
are applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). A potential ARAR for CERCLA responses is
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) land disposal restrictions (LDRs) established under the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA). The LDRs prohibit the land disposal of restricted RCRA
hazardous wastes i"1m> these wastes meet treatment standards specified in 40 CFR Part 268, meet the minimum
technology requirements during a	treatment capacity extension, or satisfy the requirements of one of the other
available i*wwpHangt» options (Le, Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition, No Migration Petition,
or Delisting). This summarizes the types and effective dates of treatment standards and outlines how to
comply with the treatment standards and the mtwfrwnm technology requirements set during national capacity
^tensions. More	gni«4a«if* on Superfund compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
United States	Office of	Directive: 9347.3-03FS
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and	July 1989
Agency	Emergency naeponse
¦ftEPA Superfund LDR Guide #3
Treatment Standards and
Minimum Technology
Requirements Under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
TYPES OF TREATMENT STANDARDS
EPA i"« *»hihn«ii»<< treatment standards i*w^*r
the LDRs on the basis of the best demonstrated
available technology (BDAT) rather than risk-based
or health-based	"Best" is	33 thar
technology which offers the greatest reduction (based
on a statistical analysis) of toxicity, mobility, or volume
of the waste. To be "demonstrated.' a treatment
technology must be demonstrated to work at a full-
scale level (L&, technologies available only on a pilot-
or bench-sole are not considered demonstrated). To
be "available* a treatment technology must be
commercially available.
Within this framework, the Agency has esrahHihed
three types of LDR treatment standards:
¦	Concentration levels - which must be attained
before the wastes or treatment residuals may be
land disposed;
¦	Specified technologies - which must be applied to
the waste before the residuals may be land
disposed; anf*
¦	No land disposal - which prohibits land disposal
of certain restricted hazardous wastes.
Concentration Levels
The majority of the LDR treatment 'standards
promulgated to ^ are wnwurmfinB levels. For
wastes with treatment standards expressed as
1'iwwntminn^ any technology that <**" achieve the
required levels may be used unless the technology is
otherwise prohibited (Le^ the BDAT used by EPA to
set the standards need not be used).
To establish a concentration Ievel(s) for a specific
waste code (e£, K062), the Agency selects a subset of
the hazardous	found in the waste (known
as "BDAT constituents") and sets treatment standards
for each of these constituents. Although these wastes
may «*""fa««i	constituents, only the treatment
standards for the "BDAT constituents* must be met
before the wastes can be land disposed. The residues
from treatment of an originally liked waste (e^, ash,
scrubber water) are also liked RCRA hazardous wastes
(because of the 'derived from" rule), and therefore,
also are prohibited from land disposal unless they meet
treatment standards for the waste code(s) of the
original listed waste(s) from which they derive.
EPA has promulgated separate standards for
wastewaters and nonwastewaters for treatment
standards expressed as concentration levels. For LDRs,
wastewaters normally are defined as wastes containing
less than one percent total organic carbon (TOC) and
less than one percent total suspended solids. All other
matowaU (including soil and debris) are riawifirri as
nonwastewaters, except for F001-P005 wastes, for which
only the TOC is used to define wastewaters.
Concentrations of BDAT constituents in solid
residues from treatment must not exceed the
-------
nonwastewater concentrations. Similarly, the
concentration of BDAT constituents in wastewaters
from treatment (e^, incineration scrubber water) must
not exceed the wastewater concentrations. Highlight 1
provides an example of standards expressed as
concentration levels for K062 waste.
Highlight 1 • TREATMENT
STANDARDS FOR K062 WASTE
CunHuMil	Total Watte 7CLP
	fmg/n
Total	NA	(L094
Lead	NA	037
Total chromium	0-32	NA
Nickel	144	NA
Lead	(MM	NA
* KD62 wine is spent pickle Uqnor generated by
the itcd fiitkhwij opmtiQM of
wititin the iron and sted industry.
Specified TwfrwtoBtt
If a treatment standard is promulgated as a
specified technology, that technology most be used to
treat the waste unless an Equivalent Treatment Method
Petition is approved by the Administrator. To be
granted, such a petition must demonstrate that the
alternative technology achieves an equivalent measure
of performance. For example, the Agency has set the
treatment standard for California list PCB wastes
containing greater than 500 ppm PCBs as thermal
destruction. These wastes most be incinerated to
99.9999 percent destruction and removal efficiency
(DRE) under the LDRs before the ash from treatment
may be land disposed unless a Petition allowing an
equivalent treatment method is granted.
I
-------
Iwr<*t^T prgA Wa'"rHr",< Watfa*
Diarin-contaimng wastes (FQ2O-F023 and F026-
PQ28), include chlorinated dibenzD-p-diaxins (CDDs),
dibeiuufiirans (CDFs), and chlorophenok
The treatment standards eaqiressed as concentration
levels are based on incineration of contaminated sdL
flaunt funrnt analytical methods nifiwirf the
concentration levels attainable by the BDAT, EPA set
the treatment standards at the practical detection limits
(Le, l ppb) for most wastes. These standards are also
based on a TCLP analysis (40 CFR 268.41).
Although the LDR treatment standards for diaxin-
mwrniwmg wastes are concentration levels, the diasttt*
listing rale (50 FR 1978) requires special management
standards for certain types of units:
a Incineration in accordance with 40 CFR 264343
and 40 CFR 265352;
¦	Thermal treatment to 99.9999 percent DRE in
accordance with 40 CFR 265383; or
¦	Tank treatment, in accordance with 40 CFR
2642)0.
2 describes the LDR restrictions in effect
for solvent' and	RCRA hazardous
wastes.
California Liar ffjffflnlflH Wfffi
Hie California list rale established specified
technologies as the treatment standards for certain
California list wastes. Specifically, California list PCB
and halogenated organic compound (HOC) wastes
(except dilute HOC wastewaters) must be incinerated
or burned in high-efficiency boilers or industrial
furnaces.	3 provides the LDR restrictions in
effect for California list wastes.
Firrt Third Wastes
The First Third scheduled wastes include those
wastes that are intrinsically hazardous or are
high-volume wastes. EPA promulgated treatment
standards expressed as concentration levels and no land
disposal based on TWA and TCLP for certain First
Third wastes on August 17, 1988. First Third wastes
that do not have promulgated treatment standards are
restricted under the "soft hammer" provisions.
4 describes the LDR restrictions in effect for
certain First Third wastes for which the Agency has set
treatment
MINIMUM TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS
THAT APPLY DURING A NATIONAL CAPACITY
OTENSION
If	promulgation of treatment standards
the Agency determines that hwnffirienf treatment
capacity exists, the Agency may grant a national
capacity extension for a period of up to two years.
During the extension period, if wastes are to be land
disposed in surface impoundments or landfill*, the ""in
must comply with the RCRA Subtitle C minimum
technology requirements (Le^ double liner, leachate
collection system, and ground-water monitoring) under
RCRA 30Q5(j)(2) or (j)(4) or the receiving units must
have a retrofitting waiver under RCRA 3004(o)(2) or
30050 to be considered equivalent to the minimum
technology requirements.
Highlight 2 • EFFECTIVE DATES AND LDR RESTRICTIONS FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS
us* HiTAmna hbsxb

xn is xmcz
. as or auviiflm a. 1988
TO01 to 7003 (apaat
•olveat-eentalaiae
mitM)
fcwabac 8. 1984
oz lltwnhw 8, 1988*
Txaataant standards aa eoaeaatxatloa
lavala (TCLP)
F020 to F023.
F026 to 7028 (dlmrln-
centalnine nitul
Sovaofear 8, 1988
Traataant ataadarda aa eoaeaatxatloa
lava la (TOP)
eontaalnatad aith
aolvaat/dloxla
lBt Croa CE8CL4/BCHA
eorraetiv* aetioaa
8. 1988
Traataaot ataadarda aa eaaeaatcatlea
lava la (TCLPJ
Sail and dabrla
eontaaloatad with
aolvant/dloxin
Craa CZBCLA/BCBA
eorractlva aetioaa
Bowaabar 8. 1990
Hinlnrm tactaology roquiraMnta 12
dlapoaad of la landfill or auztaea
iopoaadsMat
* Soil ad dtbrii cootaaisad with aolvant-canfcalnlnt «ut« gratad • iutntory two-r«»r axtaaaiaa to
Hovobar S. 1968. All othar aolvant-contalnlm vaataa bMM eaatrtetad an lovaabar 8, 1986.
-------
Highlight 3 - EFFECTIVE DATES AND LDR RESTRICTIONS FOR CALIFORNIA LIST WASTES*7
California list PCB»
Liquid ad bob-liquid SOCs
Sail md dabrla eoataalBatad
with BOCa SSI CEBCLA/BC8A
oarraatlvw aetioas
sail —ut	contaminated
with BOCa froa QBCLA/8C8A
eoxzactlva aetioas
US
as cr
8, 1968
J®iy 8, 1987	Traataaat standards aa spaclfiad
tMhaolofrdaa)
Bovaobar 8, 1988	Traataant ataadacda aa apaelfled
t*ehnole*7(iaa)
July 8. 1989
aovilxr 8, 1990
Ntalsa technology raqulramats it
dlspoaad of la landfill or luxfaca
Klalm technology reqaircBeats if
dlapoaad of la landfill or turface
if Sao Saparftmd US (Soldo ** for soft aad hard
wastes.
restrictions la affect for r mining California llat
National capacity rttcmiona for several types of
wastes currently are in effect under the LDRs. For
example, soil and debris from CERCLA and RCRA
corrective actions that are wmfamtwqyyf with solvent,
difwrin, and California fist wastes have received an
extension until November 8, 1990. sol and debris
contaminated with First Third wastes for which the
BDAT is based on solids incineration have received an
extension until August 8, 1990. Land disposal of
wastes subject to national capacity extensions in units
other than surface impoundments and landfills (e^,
waste piles, land treatment units) is not subject to the
minimum technology requirements during such an
wtwuinj.
WASTES
4 • EFFECTIVE DATES AND LDR RESTRICTIONS FOR CERTAIN FIRST THIRD
lut or
tusts
OIBZXVI
US u—mii-i »¦ a EFFECT
as as woman s, i9ss
First Third wastes (aot
otherwise icosuntad far)*'
Aacuat 8, 1988
Ttaatmanr ataadarda aa eoaeaatratioa
lavela (TWA aad TCLP) aad (for a fan
eodaa) "bo laad disposal"
Sail and dabrla contaminated
with First Third waataa
for which anAI la ggm than
aolida laeiaaratlea
August 8, 1988
traataaat ataadarda as eoaeaatratioa
lovols (TWA aad TCL?) and "no laad
diapoaal*
Soil and dabrla contaminated
with First Third waataa
for which BOAT is aolida
iaeiaoratloa
Aacoat 8. 1990
(Halms tachaalogy rcquimaota if
dlapoaad af la landfill or aurface
Sm Superfuad US Soldo ** far aoft aad hard hannar raatrietlcas is effect for First Third waataa.
fc/ Inapt K048-U32 aad K071, which wan traatad a two-year extension until August 8, 19*0.
-------
N
United Stotee	Office of	Directive: 9347.3-04FS
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and	July 1989
Agency	Emergency Response		
&EPA	Superfund LDR Guide #4
Complying With the Hammer
Restrictions Under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
CERCLA response actions must comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) when they are determined to be applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs). Compliance with the LDRs will involve meeting the LDR treatment standards, mnrinwni technology
requirements daring a	capacity extension, the soft or hard hammer restrictions, or satisfying the requirements
of one of the other LDR compliance options (i-e-» Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition, No
Migration Petition, or Delisting). This guide discusses complying with LDR soft hammer and hard hammer
provisions, which an restrictions on the disposal of hazardous wastes if EPA does not promulgate standards by the
statutory	More	gnidanr* qq Superfund compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (QSWER).
SOFT HAMMER WASTES
If the Agency fails to set treatment standards for
First or Second Third wastes by their specified
statutory dtadlhw (August 8, 1988, and June 8, 1989,
respectively), the wastes become restricted under the
soft hammer provisions until EPA sets a treatment
standard for them, or until May 8, 1990, when the
"hard hammer" provisions will falL The soft hammer
provisions specify certain restrictions that may have to
be met before the wastes can be land disposed. The
hard hammer provisions prohibit all land disposal of
the wastes. Highlight 1 lists F- and K-wastes that are
soft hammer wastes (as of June 8, 1989).
Soft	Restrictions
The LDR soft hammer provisions prohibit the
disposal of wastes in surface impoundment or landfill
niiN rnilwr
(1) The receiving unit meets the RCRA minimnm
technology requirements (Le., the unit must have
two or more liners, a Icachatc collection system,
and a ground-water monitoring system) or have an
equivalent RCRA retrofitting waiver. These
waivers are described in RCRA §30050(2), which
requires that a unit be at least one-quarter of a
rnitu from an underground drinking source,
Highlight 1 - F and K SOFT HAMMER WASTES (as of June 8, 1989)*
Waste



Waste


Coda



BraislJEaa

F006
wastewaters


to**
waatawatar* and
aeawastewsters
row
wastewater*
ad iiiiniai
itawatar*
ION
waatawatar*

no*
wastewaters
ad soawai
itawatar*
nti
waatawatars

K008
wastewaters
ad noswaa
itawatar*
xott
waatawatar* aad
aeawastswaters
nu
wastewaters


xon
waatawatar* aad
neawaatawatar*
nis
wastewaters


nss
waatawatar* aad
aoawaatawatara
Ml*
wastewaters


cos*
wastewater* aad
nanwestewatera
U17
wastewater*
aad uuuwai
itawatar*
nss
waatawatars sad
aeawastewsters
U21
wastewaters


net
wastewater*

K022
wastewater*


n«s
waatawatar*

U23
wastewaters


nw
waatawatars

U29
waatawatar*


n«r
wastewater* ad
aoawastawatara
nsi
wastewaters
ittd BOBMl
itawatar*
n«a
waatawatars aad
noswaatewatara
nss
wastewaters
aad nonwai
itawatar*
BOl
soawastewatar*

W36
waatawatar*


C02
senwaatewater*

nu
waatawatar*
ad naawai
itawatar*
uos
wastewaters aad
nenwastewaters
n«a
waatawatar*
aad aaswai
itawatar*
Q.06
wastewaters aad
saawastewatecs
* for • complete Listing of toft ten mat* restrictions, liwladina all V aad 0 mtu that are restricted,
< alt with EPA Headquarters.
-------
RCRA $30050(4), which requires that the unit be
rifNognad and operated such that there will be no
migrating of haZardOQS	gmnnH of
surface water.
Waivers granted to units utilizing aggressive
biological treatment (RCRA §30050(3)) or
undergoing corrective action (RCRA §30050(13))
are not automatically considers! equivalent to units
in compliance with the minimum technology
requirements. However, they may satisfy the
§3004(o)(2) equivalency standard on a unit-by-unit
basis.
(2) Site managers (OSCs, RPMs) certify that they have
made a good faith effort to locate and to contract
with treatment and recovery facilities for treatment
that is "practically available." If such treatment is
"practically available,' the manager must use the
best practically available treatment (see Highlight
2) to treat the wastes before they are land
disposed. If there is no 'practically available"
treatment, the soft hammer wastes may be disposed
of without treatment in units meeting the
requirements listed in (1).
Soft	wastes disposed of in units other thai
surface wipiiwiwiwiM or	do not have to meet
the soft HammiM- restrictions before land disposal
However, these wastes must comply with the LDR
notification requirements and other LDR restrictions,
such as storage prohibition. (The storage prohibition
restricts the storage of soft hammer wastes unless it is
solely for the purpose of arnmwlaring sufficient
quantities to facilitate proper treatment, recovery, or
disposal.)
Soft Hammer Requirements for Notifications,
Certifications, and Demonstrations
When soft hammer wastes are land disposed or
treated off-rite, site managers must comply with the
LDR wnrifirariftit certification, and demonstration
requirements. When treatment and land disposal occur
on-site, site managers must only meet the
demonstration requirements. (The notification and
certification requirements are administrative
requirements and do not have to be met for on-site
actions.) The specific notification requirements,
mrinrfifig to whom and when they must be sent and
the required language from 40 CFR Part 268, are
shown in HigfrHght 3 for each of these categories.
California List and Soft Hammer Overlap
Certain soft t"""""1 wastes also may be California
list wastes, in which case they may be subject either to
the California list or soft hammer requirements. If a
waste is restricted by soft hammer and California list
restrictions, site managers should meet the more
stringent standard for the waste.
¦	If treatment standards have been promulgated for
a California list waste that is also a soft hammer,
the California list treatment standard must be met
for the waste before it is land disposed of into anv
type of unit. In this case, the soft hammer
restrictions and notification, certification, and
demonstration requirements do not apply.
¦	If treatment standards have sot been promulgated
for a California list waste that is also a soft
hammer, and the waste is to be land disposed in
a surface impo^m-nt ™ infill, one of two
situations may arise:
(1) If treatment is "practically available,' a site
manage must use the "best" treatment to meet
the soft hammer requirements.
Highlight 2 ° GUIDE TO 'PRACTICALLY
AVAILABLE" AND 'BEST TREATMENT
Available - Site managers aay
consider coat In determining what treatments
are "practically aval Labia" according to the
following mat ratio:
Coat of traataaat. shlnaent. and disposal
Coat of ahipaaat nd dlaposal
-	A ratio of 2.0 or greater (l.a., the cost
of treataent at laaat doubles the eoat of
disposing of tha waste without treataent)
ganaxally la not "practical";
-	A ratio between 1.3 and 2.0 generally is
practical unless, on a caae-by-ease basis,
tha sita manager can danrmstrate why thia
treataent should not ba considered
practical; and
-	A ratio of 1.9 or laas generally is
practical.
This coat ratio is anlv a auldalina far asking
decisions about practically available
treataanta; it is not « tula.
¦ Baat Traataaat - Of tha traataaat technologies
that are "practically available," site osnsgsrs
are required to use the technology that yields
the greataat environmental benefit. Ia
general, EPA favors recycling/recovery as the
best aethod for treating a waste, the next
beat general category of traatoant ia
dastraction (thermal or chemical), especially
far organic waataa. Where neither recovery nor
deatructicn ia available or appropriate,
lnobilisation of tha wastss nay be conaldered
"beat," aapeclally for inorganic wastes.
(2) If treatment is not "practically available," the
waste still must, at a	be treated t
below the California list prohibition levels
before being land disposed to satisfy the
California list restrictions.
-------
Highlight 3 • SOFT HAMMER NOTIFICATION, CERTIFICATION, AND DEMONSTRATION
REQUIREMENTS
XT UD DISPOSAL QCC0B8 9
as unmi nans
BomzcAizoB
(off-sita only)
Traataant or
disposal'
facility
raealving
MM t«
With aaefe
mat*
ahlpaant
Notification that tha waata la a soft hawmac
waata. S pacific intonation ineludaa:
-	SPA hasardous wasta maabar;
-	Any applicabla prohibitions (a.g., aoft
*»—»-» provision);
-	Manifest noabar asaoeiatad with shipment of
wasta; md
-	Haata analysis data, whara availabla.
asnncAzzaH -
12 traataant is
not practically
availabla
(off-sita only)
csmncAXxoB -
If traataant. jg
practically
availabla
- (off-sita only)
SPA Rational
Ataiaistrator
and
Disposal
facility
raealving
waata
EPA Ragional
Administrator
aad
Traataant
facility
raealving
wasta
At tiaa of
first waata
shijmant and
copy with
aacb wasta
shipment
At tiaa of
first waata
shipsant and
copy with
aacb wasta
ahijaant
Certification should appaar as follows:
"EPA sartlfiaa under panalty of law that tba
requirements of *0 CPS 268.8(a)(1) hava baan oat
and that diapoaal in a landfill or aurfaca
iapounrtnant is tha only practical alternative to
treatment currently availabla. SPA baliavas that
tho Information submitted is trua, accurate, aad
complete. EPA is awara that there ara signlfleant
panaltiea for subnitting falsa iaforaatlon,
tha poaaibility of fiaa and
ioprisosBant."
Cartlfication should appaar as follows:
"SPA eartifiaa under panalty of law that tba
requiraaants of *0 CPS 248.8(a)(1) hava baan
oat and that tha agency has coatraetad to traat
its waata (or will otharwiaa provlda traataant)
by tha praotieally availabla technology which
yialds tha greatest environmental banafit, as
ladicatad in ita demonstration. EPA beliavaa that
tho infornation submitted is trua. accurata, and
eoaplete. EPA is awara that thara ara aigaificant
penaltiea for subaltting falsa Information,
Including tha poaaibility of flna and
laprlsoneat."
DZMS8S1RATX0H -
If jjfl traataant
is available
(off-sita and
on-slta)
SPA Ragional At tiaa of	List of facilitias and facility officials
Administrator first waata contaetad, addresses, talapbona manbers, and
shipment	contact dataa. Also, a writtan diacuaalea of
whaa treatment or recovery is not practical
for tha waata.
DBUERHAXIOB -
If treatment
la availabla
(off-sita aad -
on-aita)
SPA Ragional
Administrator
At tiaa of
first waata
ahlpaant
Liat of facilitias and facility officials
contacted, addrasaas, talapbona mobara, and
contaot dataa. Provlda information on tha
ehoaaa traataant taebnology aalactad bacauaa
it provides tha graataat anviroaaantal banafit.
la both cases, site managers must meet the
appropriate soft hammer notification t iwtiliwifinH[
anri HwwmirtniHnn requirements.
If the waste will be land disposed in a unit other
than a surface impoundment or landfill (e^, waste
pile), the waste must, at a minimum, be treated below
the California list prohibition level before being land
disposed. The soft hammer restrictions do not apply,
and a site manager does not have to meet the soft
hammer notification, certification, and demonstration
More information on California list wastes and
their overlap with soft hammer wastes is found in LDR
Guide #2. A step-by-step process to comply with the
soft hammer restrictions is shown in Highlight 4.
-------
HARD HAMMER WASTES
The hard hammer provisions prohibit land disposal
of restricted wastes if EPA fails to promulgate
treatment standards by the statutory	for
solvent- and djonn-crmfaining and California list wastes
and by May 8, 1990, for all of the scheduled wastes.
The deadlines for these wastes are shown in Highlight
5. At present, the hard hammer provisions have only
fallen for California list cyanides and	EPA has
also codified statutory prohibition levels for. California
list corrosive wastes and dilate HOC wastewaters.
Codification of the prohibition levels has the same
as the hard !»¦"¦** fan* iwwi iti«pnoi
of these wastes is prohibited when wastes are found in
concentrations above the prohibition levels.
There are only two exceptions to the prohibition
on land disposal of the hard hammer wastes: rirlrving
and a No-Migration Petition. Delisting is a general
option for demonstrating that a listed waste is no
longer hazardous that is available under RCRA §260.20
asd §260.22. The process to obtain No-Migration
Petitions is specified in RCRA §26&6. To obtain a
Petition, disposal facilities demonstrate that there will
be no "'ption of hazardous	from
disposal unit or injection zone for as long as the waste
remains hazardous. This is a rulemaking petition and
is eipectftd to require extensive documentation.
Highlight 5: HARD HAMMER DEADLINES
Waste
Hard Hammer Statutory
Deadline
Solvent &
dioxin wastes
November 8, 1986
California
list wastes
iuly 8, 1987
CERCLA/RCRA
corrective action
soil and debris
wwir»iniiiafwl With
solvent and dionh
and California
list wastes
November 8, 1988
Scheduled wastes
(1st Third, 2nd
Third, and 3rd
Third wastes)
May 8, 1990
-------
3"«e:v«: 3i*r 3-c;?3
Enwenmenei Prowcaen SMWim^	Jwv'MS
*C>
-------
For on-site disposal. placement occurs whea wastes
are moved from one AOC (or oak) into another AOC
(or unit). Placement does not tut whea wastes are
left in place, or noted within a single AOC. Highlight
2 provides sceaarios of whea pi*Tmm does and does
sot occur, as defined ia the proposed NCP. The
Agency is cumat reevaluating the definition of
placement prior to the promulgation of the fiaal NCP,
and therefore, these scenarios are subject to change.
Highlight 2: PLACEMENT
Placement does occur whea wastes are:
¦	Consolidated from different
AOCs into a single AOC;
¦	Moved outride of an AOC (for
treatment or storage, for
example) and returned to the
same or a different AOC; or
¦	Excavated from aa AOC placed
ia a separate unit, such aa aa
iadaerator or taak that is within
the AOC and redeposited iato
the same AOC
Placement does not occur whea wastes
are:
¦	Treated ia situ;
a Capped ia place;
¦	Consolidated within the AOC or
¦	Processed withia the AOC (bat
not ia a separate unit, such at a
tank) to improve iu structural
stability (e^, far cappiag or to
support heavy machinery).
Ia summary, If ptacoMaf ea-attt or off*tte dots
not occur, the LDRa an see appUcihto to the
Superfoad actioo.
(2) IS THE CERCLA SUBSTANCE A RCRA
HAZARDOUS WASTE?
Because a CERCLA respoase must constitute
placement of a restricted argA	ware for
the LORs to be applicable, site managers must evaluate
whether the "«¦»—"»¦» if the CERCLA site are
RCRA hazardous wastes. Highlight 3 briefly describe*
the two types of RCRa hazardous wastes -listed inr
characteristic wastes.
Highlight 3: RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTES
A RCRA solid wis to* is hazardous if it is
littfid or exhibits a hazardous characteristic.
Listed RCRA	w"rr
Any waste listed ia Subpart D of 40
CFR 261, including
¦	F waste codes (Part 26L31)
¦	K waste codes (Part 26L32)
a P waste codes (Part 26L33(e»
a U waste codes (Part 26L33(f))
Qtaratfemrif ttrPA
Any waste ThiWriwj one of the following
characteristics, as defined ia 40 CFR 261:
• Ignitability
a Corrosivity
a Reactivity
a Extraction Procedure (EP)
Toxicity
* A MM «ana m *ay oatanal that « diacardad or
lapwl of (La. lined on art. mydad ia cattaia »aj«. or
cooadatad iflAaiaaitjr —ni lika). Tha «aata aaa? b«
Mtttf, ¦mmHid. Uqwd. or a ipaaiiwd paaoua aaianaL
Piriiiamni fraa om daflmaoa (*4. Sowanc u«t(i
iliit^) iffiw ia <0 CFR 261.4(a). Eaapoooi («.*.
taettU Ma) an fouad ta 40 CFR 261.4(b).
Site aaaagers are sot required to presume that a
CERCLA hazardous substance ia a RCRA hazardous
waste ualesa there ia affirmative evidence to suppc
such a finding. Site maaagen, therefore, should u.
'reasoeabie efforts* to determine whether a substance'
is a RCRA listed or characteristic waste. (Current
data coUecrioa efforts during CERCLA removal and
-------
remedial site investigations should be sufficient for this
purpose.) For listed hazardous wastes, if manifests or
labels are not available, this evaluation likely will
require fairly specific information about the waste (e.g*
source, prior use, process type) that is 'reasonably
ascertainable* within the scope of a Superfund
investigation. Such information may be	from
facility business records or from an examination of the
processes used at the facility. For stuoSfiOSis "sstes,
site managers may rely on the results of the tests
described ia 40 CFR 26L21 • 26L24 for each
characteristic or on knowledge of the properties of the
substance. Site managers should work with Regional
RCRA staff, Regional Counsel, State RCRA staff, and
Superftud enforcement personnel, as appropriate, ia
milnwj	Amtmi niimriftM
In addition to undemanding the two categories of
RCRA hazardous wastes, site managers will also seed
to understand the derived*from rale, the mixture rule,
and the contained-in interpretation to identify correctly
whether a CERCLA substance is a RCRA hazardous
waste. These three principles, as well as an
introduction to the RCRA	process, are
described below.
Derived-from Rale (40 CFR 26L3(c)<2))
Tie derived-from rule states that any solid wm«
derived from the treatment, storage, or disposal of a
Hated RCRA hazardous waste is itself a listed
hazardous waste (regardless of the concentration of
hazardous constituents). Far sample, ash and
scrubber water from the iaciaoadoa of a fitted waste
are hazardous wastes on the basis of the derived-from
rule. Solid wastes derived from a sjUBSUSttfe
hazardous waste are hazardous wastes aatf if they
exhibit a characteristic
Minora Rale (40 <71 ICUfe)®)
Under the mittan fldft, whea say	aad
a lists! hazardous laitt an mind, Che *¦*¦"> mixture
is a listed tuzardoos waste. For t1* if a
generator mixes a dram of fated F006 rlmroplatiwg
waste with a non-hazardous wastewater (wastewaters
are solid wastes • see Highlight 3), (he entire mimre
of the F006 and wastewater is a listed hazardous waste.
Mixtures of solid w«te» and characteristic hazardous
wastes are hazardous only if the mixture exhibits a
characteristic
Coataln«d4n Interpretation (OSW Memorandum dated
November 13, 1986)
The contained-in interpretation states chat any
msure of a nog.>>•» a CERCLA waste
is a RCRA hazardous waste, this waste also must be
for the LDRs to be aa applicable
requirement. A RCRA hazardous waste becomes a
restricted waste aa its HSWA	or
sooner if the Ageacy promulgates a standard before
the	Beeause the LORs are beiag phased ia
over a period of tine (see Highlight 4), site managers
may accd to determine what type of restrictioa is ia
-------
H%fcUgkt 4: LDR STATUTORY DEADLINES

Spcst SoiMat tad Otoa*>
Conamtni W«m
Ciliforeu Lin w«gta
RmThirf Warn
Sprat SoteaL Diexa-
Conoimnf, aatf Ciliforeu
Lot Sari tad Dtftnt Pro®
CSXO»RCSA Cormm
Smx* T*twi Wmm
Tktf Hurt Warn*
Noitf temafM
WlIM
effect at the time placement is to oecur. For example,
if the RCRA hazardous wastes at a site ate earreatly
under a natioaai capacity eaeasioe whea the CERCLA
decision	is	go meanders should
evaluate whether the response actios win be completed
before the eaensioa expires. If these wutes are
disposed of ia surface impiximlniftaa or	prior
to the expiratioQ of the —*—r~y the receiving unit
would have to meet mamni rcwhaotrny requirements,
but the wastes would eat haw to be treated to meet
the LOR treatment oaadarda.
APPLICABILITY DCTIRMINATIONS
If the site manager deteraiaes that the LORs are
applicable to the CERCLA response based oe the
previous three questions, the site minstiir muse (1)
comply with the LDR restrictioa ia effect, (2) comply
with the LORs by choming one of the LOR
compliance options (e.g* Treatability Variance, No
Migration Petition), or (3) invoke an ARAR waiver
(available only for oa»site actions). If the LDRi are
determined not to be applicable, then, for on-site
actions only, the site manager should determine if the
LORs are relevant and appropriate. The process for
deter"""'"!! whether the LORs are applicable to a
CERCLA action is summarized ia Highlight S.
Highlight S • DETERMINING WHEN LORS
ARE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS
.Somber 1 19M
JuiyS, 19T
Aufm 1 IKS
Vowabwl 1981
Jom s. m»
SUf 8. 1990
Wltftta 4 aeam of
rftantanna m a
-------
CERCLA response actions most comply with the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) when they are determined to
be applicable or relevant aad appropriate requirements (ARARs). (The Agency has decided, however, that the LDRs are not
relevant and appropriate for soil and debris wastes at this time.) For the LDRs to be applicable, the CERCLA response action
most constitute placement of a restricted RCRA hazardous waste (see LDR Guide #5). Compliance with the LDRs will involve
either meeting the LDR treatment standards, other LDR restrictions (e.g^ soft hammers), or satisfying the requirements of one
of the other alternate LDR compliance options (&£, Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition). This guide
outlines the process for obtaining and complying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that are contaminated with
RCRA hazardous wastes for which the Agency has set treatment standards. More detailed guidance on Superfund compliance
with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
Unttad Statas	Office of	Oiractiv* 9347.3-06FS
Environmental Protection Solid Was* and	July 1989
Agency	Emergency Response
6EPA Superfund LDR Guide #6A
Obtaining a Soil and Debris
Treatability Variance for
Remedial Actions
BASIS FOR A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
When promulgating the LDR treatment standards, the
Agency recognized that treatment of wastes to the LDR
treatment standards would not always be possible or
appropriate. In addition, the Agency recognized the
importance of ensuring that the LDRs do not unnecessarily
restrict the development and use of alternative and
innovative treatment technologies for remediating hazardous
waste sites. Therefore, a Treatability Variance process (40
CFR $268.44) is available to comply with the LDRs when
a Superfund waste differs significantly from the waste used
to set the LDR treatment standard such that:
¦	The LDR standard cannot be met; or
¦	The best demonstrated available technology (BDAT)
used to set the standard is inappropriate for the waste.
Superfund site managers (OSCs, RPMs) may need to
seek a Treatability Variance to comply with the LDRs when
managing restricted soil and debris wastes (see Highlight 1)
because the LDR treatment standards are based on treating
less complex matrices of industrial process wastes (except
for the dioxin standards, which are based on treating
contaminated soil). A Treatability Variance does not
remove the requirement to treat restricted sofl aad debris
wastes. Rather, under a Treatability Variance, alternate
treatment levels are	based on data from actual
treatment of soil, or best management practices for debris.
Although the specific justification required to obtain a
Treatability Variance may differ from site-to-site, site
managers generally will make this justification on the basis
of: (1) Available information on the performance capabilities
: of the technology(ie3) being considered; (2) Site-specific
conditions that may affect die implementation or
effectiveness of those technologies; and (3) The remediation
goals of the CERCLA response action.
At many sites, data from treatability studies conducted
during the RI/FS will suffice as justification for obtaining
a Treatability Variance. For example, if data from
treatability studies indicate that the full-scale operation of
a specific treatment technology cannot «m
-------
treatability studies and from remedial actions conducted at
other sites; and (3) Easting literature that describes the
effectiveness/limitations of specific treatment technologies.
Unless the surrogate data show that a technology operated
at full scale can r,n"268.44);
¦A statement of need and Justification for the proposed aetion (e.g., "data do not Indicate that full seals treatment
can consistently attain the LOR treataent standards for all waate areas, including tha moat contaminated areas, at the
' site.")
•a description of the soil or debris wests (e.g.. Information on the physical and chemical characteristics of the waste,
including waste analysis data) and dsacription of tha source of the contamination;
sif the soil and debris waate has been treated (e.g., treatability study), o* surrogate data are available, a description
of the treataent system (e.g.. process design, oporsting conditions) and explanation of why the LOR treataent standard
cannot be achieved using the treatment system or why the BOAS technology is inappropriate for the waste;
•	If the soil and debrla waste has not been treated, an explanation of why the BOAT treataent technology is inappropriate
or why treetaent of the waste will not be able to achieve the US treataent standards;
¦A description of tha aothodologles and equipment used to obtain representative saoplas, a description of the saopla
handling and preparation techniques, and a description of the QA/QC aeasursa for waste analysis and treataent.
¦A description of any alternative treatment oathods essoined by tha petitioner a description of the trsataant method that
the petitioner believes is appropriate to treat waate and aa Identification of the interim "treataent levels'* developed
by the lead agsney for the waste constituents or bast management practices; end
¦For each alternative for which a Treatability Variance is required, the specific treataent level range to be achieved
to comply with the LDRs through a treatability Variance (see	to deteraine these treataent levels).
OFT-aiTE
for off-site Treatability Variances, the documentation requirements above should ba extracted from the RI/7S report
and combined with the following information in a aeparata document;
•Petitioner's name and address and identification of aa authorised contact person (if different);
¦Statement of petitioner's interest in obtaining s Treatability Variance; and
*	This document may be prepared after the ROD is signed (and Treetabllity Variance granted) but will need to be compiled
prior to the first shipment of wastes (or treataent residuals) to the receiving treataent or disposal facility.
-------
w ttenort
The FS Report should contain the necessary information
(see Highlight 2) to justify a Treatability Variance using,
where appropriate, data and findings from the RI Report.
In the Detailed Analysis of Alternatives chapter of the FS
Report, a general discussion of why a Treatability Variance
is necessary should be included in the description of each
alternative for which a variance is required. This
description also should specify the treatment level range(s)
that the treatment technology would attain for each waste
constituent restricted under the LDRs and the primary
ffnntawiiwawu of concern identified during the Superfund
baseline risk assessment. (The more specific and detailed
information, such as relevant waste analysis data from
sampling, should be placed in an appendix to the report.)
In addition. under the Comparative Analysis of Alternatives
section, when rfivinwng the 'Compliance with ARARs
Criteria,* site managers should indicate which alternatives
wQl require a Treatability Variance to comply with the
LDRs.
Highlight 3 • SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR THE
PROPOSED PLAN
Description of Alternatives section
This alternative will comply with the LDRs through
a Treatability Variance under 40 CFR 268.44. This
Variance will result in the use of {specify technologr]
to attain the Agency's interim yeatment
levels/ranges" for the contaminated soil at the site
(see Detailed Analysis of Alternatives Chapter of the
FS Report for the specific treatment levels for each
constituent).
Evaluation of Alternatives section, under "Compliance
with ARARs'
The LDRs are ARARs for [Enter number] of [Enter
total number of alternatives] remedial alternatives
being considered. [Enter number] of the [Enter
total number of alternatives] alternatives would
comply with the LDRs through a Treatability
Variance.
fV"Tim"nirv,« Role in the	Prtsection
This Proposed Plan also seeks comment on the use
of a Treatability Variance to comply with LDRs for
each of the alternatives for which one is required.
VrooMed Wan
The intent to seek a Treatability Variance for a
particular alternative should be clearly stated in the
Description of Alternatives section of the Proposed Plan.
the Proposed Plan solicits public comment on all
of the alternatives and not just the preferred option, the
intent to obtain a Treatability Variance should be identified
for every alternative for which a Variance is required. This
opportunity for public rammmf on the Proposed Plan fulfills
the requirements for public notice and comment (off-site
actions only) on the Treatability Variance as required in
RCRA §268.44. Sample language for the Proposed Plan is
provided m Highlight 3.
Record of Decision
A Treatability Variance is granted and becomes effective
when the Record of Decision (ROD) is signed by the
Regional Administrator or Assistant Administrator/
OSWE3L The documentation provided in the ROD for a
Treatability Variance should be a concise synopsis of the
information provided in the FS Report In the Description
of Alternatives section, as part of the discussion of major
applicable requirements associated with each remedial
option, site managers should include a statement (as was
done in the FS report) that explains why a Treatability
Variance is justified and should list the treatment level
range(s) that the selected technology will attain for each
constituent. Sample language for the ROD is provided in
Highlight 4.
Highlight 4: SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR A
RECORD OF DECISION
PttqjptWB of Al»rnativ« section:
Because existing and available data do not
demonstrate that the full-scale operation of this
treatment technolo® can attain the LDR treatment
standards consistently for all soil and debris wastes
to be addressed by this action, this alternative will
comply with the LDRs through a Treatability
Variance for the wastes that cannot be treated to
meet the standard The treatment level range
established through a Treatability Variance that
[Enter technology] will attain for each constituent
as determined by the indicated analyses are:
Barium	0.1 • 40 ppm (TCLP)
Mercury	0.0002 - 0.008 ppm (TCLP)
Vanadium	02 - 22 ppm (TCLP)
TCE	95-99.9% reduction (TWA)
Cresols	90-99.9% reduction (TWA)
In the Comparative	section, under 'Compliance
with ARARs,' site managers should indicate which of the
alternatives win comply with the LDRs through a
Treatability Variance. Under the Statutory Determination
section (Compliance with ARARs), site managers should
identify the LDRs as an ARAR and indicate that a
Treatability Variance is being used to comply,
-------
HOW TO COMPLY WITH A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
FOR SOIL AND DEBRIS WASTES
SoU Wastes
Once site managers have identified the RCRA waste
codes present at the site, the neit step is to identify the
BDAT constituents of those RCRA waste codes found at
the site, and to divide these constituents into one of the
structural/functional groups shown in column 1 of Highlight
5. After dividing the. BDAT constituents into their
respective structural/functional groups, the aea step is to
compare the concentration of each constituent with the
threshold concentration (see column 3 of Highlight 5) and
to select the appropriate concentration level or percent
reduction range. If the concentration of the restricted
constituent is less than the threshold concentration, the
waste should be treated to within the rqiHf|tTHfo" rar'
If the watte concentration is above the threshold, the w.
should be treated to reduce the concentration of the waste
to within the specified percent reduction range. Once the
appropriate treatment range is selected, the third step is to
identify and select a specific technology that can achieve the
necessary concentration or percent reduction. Column 5 of
Highlight 5 fists technologies that (based on
performance data) can attain the alternative Treatability
Variance levels.
During the implementation of the selected treatment
technology, periodic analysis using the appropriate testing
procedure (Le-» total waste analysis for organic and TCLP
for inorganics) will be required to ensure the alternate
treatment levels for the BDAT constituents requiring control
are being attained and thus can be land disposed without
further treatment
Highlight 5. ALTERNATE TREATABILITY VARIANCE LEVELS AND
TECHNOLOGIES FOR STRUCTURAUFUNCTIONAL GROUPS
Structural
Functional
Group*
Concentration
Range
(ppm)
Ytoeehold
Concentration
(ppm)
ftccwit
Reduction
Rang*
Technologies that achieved
vvOonwwnovQ vmuvni
concentration guidance**
Hateganatad
Non-Polar
Aromrtea
05-10
100
8
1
8
BQBOBi inVTHnw UP 1 «Tv.
Sea WaMng. Tbamal Oaasuetan
Olonns
aooooi - 0.06
OS
80 - 90.0
OeeMorinaSon. Sol WaaNng, Tharmal Daatucton
PCS#
0.1-10
. 100
00-00.9
Thermal Oaacue&en
Mwtiddss
0.002 - o.ca
02
8
1
i
Thawi Dawuceen
Haiogsnatad
'PHaoota
OS-40
400
90-06
BWocpnal Timihl low Tamp. S>M<^
m iwv^, irwma mn\jb«vi
Hatogenatad
Aiionases
0.3-2
40
96-909
BtalogtotiTratfnarn. Low Tamp. St^speig. Sol Waaftng.
Tharmai Oeaeuceon
Cycftes
0.5-20
200
8
•
i
Thormal Oaasuceon
NKntM
Aromases
2.5 -10.0
10000
a
«
s
BtatagM Tratfnant Sot WaaMng
Thamal OeatueSen
HwanxyciKi
0.5-20
200
8
I
!
BetogMTmimM: Low Tamp. SSIpprg, Sol Waaftng.
Poiynudaar
Aremaaca
OS-20
400
06-904
i
OotagtailTtaamvi Low Tamp. S>M*^J. Sol wrnig.
OV«rPeiar
Oigaraca
05-10
100
s
«
8
Btato^otf Ttoaenant. Lear Tamp. Sttph& Sol VtaaMng.
Tfcamal Oaanueaen
;-uEy52ZiS.v'

• 		
Cadmurn
0.2-2
40
96-99.9
			 iiiiTrnr-Q
Laad
0.1 - 3
300
99 - 99.9
ImmnWnHnn. SaiWaaHno 1
Maraury
0.0002 - 0.006
0.06
8
1
8
		am in 1
¦Am rfhiiiniiy wqa» wuk nfiinwfr lam i
Othtr mrhtmktpu /way bt wrf ifmamMitf mdm or ortar mfbt
P"
i ndt

-------
Because of the variable and ¦*«—»»«¦
asaodated with uaeacavated wastes, from which only
t—f1*! data are available, treatment systems generally
. should bis riraignfd to achieve the more strtagent ead of the
treatment range (e£, 03 tor chromium, lee column 2 of
'	{) to ensure that the trcitBetu residuals from the
most contaminated potions of the waste M below the 'do
exceedance' levels (e^, 60 ppm for diromium). Should
data indicate that the treatmeat levels set through the
Treatability Variance are not being attained (Le* treatment
residuals are greater than the 'no exceedance' level), site
managers should consult with Headquarters.
Under Some circumstances, the need, to <**»'* a
Treatability Variance may not be evident until after a ROD
it signed. This situation may arise when: (1) initial
assumptions made during the RI/FS that the LDR
treatment standards would be met are proven to be
incorrect during the remedial design/action (RD/RA) phase;
or (2) previously undiscovered evidence is obtained during
RD/RA that the CERCLA waste confaim a RCRA
restricted waste and the LDRs are then determined to be
applicable but cannot be met In such situations, a site
manager would need to prepare an explanation of
differences (ESD) from the ROD and make it available to
the public to explain the need for a Treatability Variance.
In addition, unlike other ESDs that do not require public
comment under CERCLA section 117(c), if the ESD
involves granting a Treatability Variance, an opportunity for
public	would be required to fulfill the public
notice and comment requirements for a Treatability
Variance under 40 CFR $268.44.
Psferia Wa«ca
Site managers should use the same process for obtaining
a Treatability Variance described above for types of debris
that are able to be treated to the alternate treatment levels
(e^, paper, plastic). However, for most types of debris
(&&, concrete, steel pipes), which generally cannot be
treated, ste managers should use best management
practices. Drprmting oa the specific characteristics of the
debris, these practices may mdude decontamination (&g*
triple "¦*¦*{) or destruction.
LDR* IN SUPERFUND ACTIONS
Because of the important role the LDRs may play in
Superfund cleanups, site managers need to incorporate early
m the RI/FS the necessary investigative and analytical
procedures to determine if the LDRs are applicable for
remedial alternatives that involve the 'placement* of wastes.
When the LDRi are applicable, site managers should
determine if the treatmeat processes associated with the
alternatives can attain either the LDR treatment standards
or the alternate levels that would be established under a
Treatability Variance.
Site managers must first evaluate whether restricted
RCRA waste codes are present at the site, identify the
BOAT constituents requiring control, and compare (he
BDAT* constituents with the Superfund primary constituents
of concern from the baseline risk iMfrwacnt This process
identifies aQ of the constituents for which remediation may
be required. Once the viable alternatives are	in
the FS, site managers should evaluate those involving the
treatment and placement of restricted RCRA hazardous
wastes to ensure their respective technology procesa(es) will
attain the appropriate treatmeat levels (Le^ either LDR
treatment standard or Treatability Variance alternate
treatment levels for restricted RCRA hazardous wastes)
and, m accordance with Superfund goals, reductions of 90
percent or greater for Superfund primary contaminants of.
concern. The results of these evaluations are documented
in the Proposed Plan and ROD. An illustration of the
integration of LDRs and Superfund is shown in Highlight
6. An example of the process for complying with a
Treatability Variance for contaminated soil and debris is
presented in Highlight 7.
Highlight 6.
LDRs In th« RI/FS Process
5
-------
Highlight 7: IDENTIFICATION OF TREATMENT LEVELS FOR A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
At pan of the RL it has beea determined that nib to ooa location at a At coatata W06 warn tad emote (which ate tecotds indicste were
aa PDM waste). Aneaic tlao was found ia soils at a separate location. The baseline risk assessmeat irteatiffrrt TfinrT chromium, lead, and
atseaic as primaiy contaminants of concern. The eooceatntioa nags of all of the eoastiiwiuis found st the ate iachtded:
Tool Coerratrniuo TCLP	Total fhnmiiisissi	TOP
Coarttucat	(Bids)	fesA		(agflg)	tedL
Cadmum 1270 • 16J00 120 - 146 MM	100- 140 1 - 6-5
Chromium 3.160 • 4,390 30 • 56 SOmr	1 • 3 —
Cyanide* 80-150 1-16 Cresoto	50 - 600 JS - 4
Lead 500 ¦ 622 2 - 12J Aflaaie	800 .1900 3 -9
Four remedial alternatives an being considered: (1) Low temperature thermal itripping of tod contaminated with cresols followed by
—of the ash: (2) Snhfltration of the nil ia * mobile unit; (3) la-tim Bahfltrarion; asd (4) Capping of wastes. Each of these
alternatives am be evaluated to determine if they will result ia Bgmflcsnt reduction of the toxicity, mobility, or volume of the waste; whether
•placement* occurs; and. if "placement* occurs, whether the treatment will attaa LDR treatment oadards or alternative treatment levels
established through a Treatability Variance for the BOAT luusritwints requumg coned.
SEEP 1: IDENTIFY THE RESTRICTED COhBRIUEKIS
¦	Because PD06 and F004 wastes have been identified at the site, the Supcrfuad lite manager must meet the treatment standards or
alternate treatment levels established through a Treatability Variance for the BOAT constituents. These constituents are: Cadmium,
Ouomium, Lead, Nkfed, Silver, and Cyanide for F006 and Craois for FOM.
AND DIVIDE THE COfCTTTUENTS INTO THEIR STRUCTURAL/PUNCnONAL GROUPS (see Highlight 4):
s All of the F006 constituents are ia the iaoigauka structural/fuacttosai group.
¦ Cresols are ia the Other Mar Otpnk Compound! structural/functional group.
¦	Ia accordance with program goals, the preferred remedy also should result ia the effective reduction (Le- it least 90 percent) of all
pnmary constituents of concern (ia. Cadmium, Chiumiua. Lead, fid Arsenic).
SIEP 2: COMPARE THE CONCENTRATION THRESHOLD POUND IN RXGHUGRT5 TO TOE CONCENTRATIONS POUND AT THE
SnE AND (MOOSE EITHER THE CONCENTRATION LEVEL RANGE OR PERCENT REDUCTION RANGE FOR EACH
RESTRICTED CONSTITUENT.
Site	Threshold	Appropaatc Range	Range to be adieved
CnminHarino Crmratnrioa Ownimrino PewratRcrtocrioo	(cnmplianrr analysis)
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Cresols
120-
30 •
2 ¦
1 ¦
50-
146 ppm
56 ppm
12i ppm
6J ppm
600 ppm
>
<
<
<
>
40 ppm
120 ppm
300 ppm
20 ppm
100 ppm
X
X
X
95-99.9 Percent Reduction (TCLP)
05-6 ppm (TCLP)
0.1 - 3 ppm (TCLP)
0.5 - 1 ppm (TCLP)
90-99.9 Percent Reduction (TCLP)
STEP 3: IDENnFY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES THAT MEET THE TREATMENT RANGES
¦	HghHght 5 lists the technologies that achieved the alternate treatment levels for each sttuctwal/fuacrioaal group.
¦	Because cresols ate present ia relatively low concentrations (asumed for the purposes at this cample), a TCLP may be used to
determine if immobilisation results in a sufficient reducnoa of mobility of this muiued RCRA hazardous waste. (Measures to address
any wiauzation of organics during immobilization ptaeemu win be accessary.)
¦	Immobilization also will result ia the eOteHne redaction ia teachability (iA, it least 90 percent) at arsenic a Superfuad pnmary
contaminant of eoacem.
Alternative at TuS^Mahffi^tatan? '

Matt LDR Treatment
aata* tar BOAT OMteems
Meet TreattMBty Variance
Alternate Levels?
1. Low temperature stripptag/




Stabilization
Yes
Yes
No (aot for cresols) °
Yes
2, Stabilizatioa in mobile uait
Yes
Yes
No (aot for aeaols)
Yes
3. la-situ subiliatioa
Yea (Mobility)
No (LDRs aot ARARs) —
—
4. Capping in Place
No
No (LDR* ai
x ARARs) —
•
* Treatability studies conducted duriag RI/FS iadicited the staadatd could aot be net consistently for all sods contaminated with cresols.
¦ After ha laming the tradeoff* among alternatives with respect to the aiae evaluation criteria, the Agency determined that stabilization
of wastes in a mobile uait is the preferred alternative. The aot step ia to seek aad obtaia a Treatability Vananca for the preferred
alternative ia the Proposed Plan and ROD.
-------
United States	Office*	Dirocava 9347.3-07FS 1
Envhuuiienm Protection Solid Wast* and .	Decamoer 1939
Agency	Eme^ency Response
A EPA Superfund LOR Guide #6B
Obtaining a Soil and Debris
Treatability Variance for
Removal Actions
On-site CERCLA response actions most comply with the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) when' they are
determined to be applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). On-site CERCLA removal actions must comply
with the LDRs to the extent practicable when they are determined to be ARARs. The two factors that determine whether
the LDRs can be practicably complied with during a removal response are; (1) the urgency of the situation and (2) the scope
of the removal action to be taken. For the LDRs to be applicable, the CERCLA removal action must constitute placement
of a restricted RCRA hazardous waste (see Superfund LDR Guide #5). For the LDRs to be relevant and appropriate, [hey
must address problems or situations sufficiently similar to the circumstances of the release, or remedial action contemplated,
and be well-suited to the site. (See Superfund LDR Guide #7.) Compliance with the LDRs will involve either meeting the
LDR treatment standards, mewing other LDR restrictions (e^, soft hammers), or satisfying the requirements of one of the
other alternate LDR compKanre options («• g. Treatability Variance, Equivalent Treatment Method Petition). This guide outlines
the process for ohtatntng and complying with a Treatability Variance daring removal actions for soil and debris contaminated
with RCRA hazardous wastes for which the Agency has set treatment standards. More derailed guidance on Superfund
compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
BASIS FOR A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
When promulgating the LDR treatment standards, the
Agency recognized that treatment of wastes to the treatment
standards	gjjgg best	available
technology (BDAT) would not always be possible or
appropriate (RCRA $268.44). In addition, the Agency
recognized the importance of ensuring that the LDRs do
not unnecessarily restrict the development and use of
alternative and innovative treatment	for
remediating hazardous waste sites. Therefore, a Treatability
Variance process is available to comply with the LDRs when
a Superfund waste differs	from the waste used
to set the LDR treatment standard that;
¦	The LDR standard cannot be met; or
¦	The BDAT used to set the standard is inappropriate
for the waste.
During on-site removal	Superfund on-scene
coordinators (OSCs) must comply with the LDRs if the
LDRs are ARARs and compliance with the LDRs is
practicable. For removals involving off-site **»[** OSCs
must simply determine if the LDRs are applicable. When
managing restricted soil and debris wastes (see	1),
OSCs may need to seek a Treatability Variance to comply
with the LDRs h——far the standards
which are based on treating contaminated soil, the LDR
treatment standards are bued on treating less complex
matrices of industrial process wastes. A Treatability
Variance does not remove the	to treat
restricted soil and debris wastes. Rather, under a Variance,
aa OSC selects alternate treatment levels the Agency has
which are based on data from actual treatment
of soil or best management practices for debris.
Although the specific justification required to obtain a
Treatability Variance' may differ from site to site, OSCs
generally will make this justification on the basis o t (1)
available information on the performance capabilities of the
treatment tedmology(ies) bemg considered; (2) site-specific
i-nniliiimn fhaf may	the implementation or
effectiveness of those technologies; and (3) the goals or
scope of the CERCLA removal action.
1: SOIL AND DEBRIS
Sofl. Soil is defined as materials that are primarily of
geologic origin such as sand, silt, loam, or day, that
are mdigenousto the natural geologic environment at
or near the CERCLA site. . (In many cases, soil is
mixed with liquids, sludges, and/or debris.)
Debris. Debris is defined as materials that are
primarily non-geologic in origin, such as grass, trees,
jjjJ man-made	concrete,
rindilng partially-buried whole or empty drums,
njwwnw aitrf ntht-r	mafowalt
such as liners. (It does not include synthetic organic
but may include materials contaminated
with these chemicals.)
-------
At many removal sites, data from treatability studies or
from off-site facflitin that test waste samples may provide
justification for obtaining a Treatability Variance. For
mwiipi^ if tiara from treatability studies	that
full-scale operation of a specific treatment technology cannot
mn«tfwiriv meet the LDR treatment standards for ail soil
or debris (including the most contaminated waste areas of
the site), OSCs may use such data as justification to obtain
a Treatability Variance for the contaminated soQ and debris
that	be treated to tf** standard.
When site-specific treatability study data are not available,
Mirwgafa data from the application of	to wastes
of similar types may be used to assess the effectiveness of
treating soil and debris, and to help 'OSCs determine
whether a Treatability Variance is warranted. Potential
surrogate data sources include: (1) Treatability data bases,
such as the one developed by EPA's Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory; (2) Remits from treatability studies
and from response actions conducted at other sites; and (3)
F.iwring literature that describes the effectiveness/limitations
of specific treatment technologies. Unless the surrogate
data show that a technology operated at foil scale can
consistently meet the LDR treatment standards for all soil
or debris, OSCs should seek a Treatability Variance.
In some cases (especially when treatability studies are
not conducted), ^f»	whether a treatment
technology or process can attain the LDR treatment
standards may not be available. This situation may arise
when an innovative technology is being considered, or when
a 'demonstrated* technology is being applied to wastes for
which performance data do not exist. Under such
circumstances, OSCs may select a particular technology »r
the preferred alternative, if there are technically sr
reasons to believe that it will perform effectively. W...
there are no	data available that indicate
thai the LDR treatment standards can be met consistently
for all soil or debris, OSCs should seek a Treatability
Variance.
HOW TO OBTAIN A TREATABILITY VARIANCE FOR
SOIL AND DEBRIS WASTES
Once it is determined that a CERCLA waste is a soil or
debris, and that a Treatability Variance will be necessary
(La, the LDRs are applicable and practicable for the
removal action addressing soil and debris wastes, and there
is a reasonable doubt that the LDR treatment standards ran
be met consistently for all the wastes), OSCs should initiate
the process of obtaining a Treatability Variance.
In general. for on-site removal actions, the Treatability
Variance will be in the form of a memorandum attached
to the Action Memorandum, which documents the removal
action to be taken. This attachment should include the
accessary information to justify the need for a Treatability
Variance (see w,gt,Hg,>t 2). Treatability Variances for on-
site removal are approved by Regional Administators
or their designees.
Highlight 2 - IHII Hill IIIH 10 HB "rMr*>TTW»" IB a OZAXASQJXX TABXAKX MOCBAHDtU AKD S/CA 10 QBTAQ
A awn im Helium XBEAIABXIXXT 7&2Z4BCS mm i w mrr t matu. siwh'mmi
Information to bo included in a Treatability Variance Memorandum ad EE/CA for • tail and dsbrn Treatability Variance
during on-site ad off-site moral action* is listed below. For affiltt Treatability Variances. the complete list of
docimentation requirements shntild be combined ad submitted aa a separate ducuuieut.
. OB-SITE Aim Off-STTg
¦A statement of need and Justification fox the removal action (e.g., 'data do not iadieata that full-scale traataant can
eonaiatently attain the LD& traataant standards for all mat* areas,	the most contaminate® areas, at the site."):
•A description of the aoil or debris waste (i.e., information on the physical and chaaxcal characteristics of the waste,
InnlmUng waste analysis data) and description of tho source of the contamination;
¦If the loil and debris waata haa been treated (e.g.. treatability study), or surrogate data are available, a deaerijtion
of tho treatment system (e.g., proceas design, operating coaditiona) and explanation of why the LOR treatment standard
cannot be achieved using the treatment ays tea or why the BOAT tap tan logy la inappropriate tor the waata;
¦If the soil and dabrla waata haa not bean treated, a explanation of why the BOAT treatment technology is inappropriate
or "toy there is raaaonabla doubt that treatment of tha waata will ba able to achieve the L2& traataant standarsa;
¦A description of ay alternative treatment methoda essoined by tha petitioner, a description of tha traataant method that
tho petitioner believea is appropriate to treat wasta, and an identification of tha interim "traataant levels" developed
by tho lead agency for tho waata constituents or bast management practices;
¦A daacription of tha methodologies and equipment used to obtain representative samples. a description of the sample
handling and preparation techniques, snd a description of the QA/QC meaaursa for waste analysis and traataat; and
¦For tho salaotad removal action (emergency and time-critical) or fox each alternative for which a Treatability Variance
ia required (non-rime-critical removals), tha apeeific txeatmsnt level range to be achieved to comply with the LORs through
• Treatability Variance (saa FtnhUffhTi ft to datarmlna thaae traataant lave la and HlffHllrtlti T tor a example of the variance
process).
an-sm quit
¦Petitioner's name and address and identification of a authorized contact parson (if different); ad
¦Statement of petitioner's interest in obtaining a Treatability Variance (e.g., "This petition is being submitted to obtain'
a Treatability Variance to comply with the RCBA land diapoaal restrictions at the (Enter naaal site, at which a Superfund
' removal action ii occurring.").
-------
For off-site removal actions, an OSC must submit to
Headquarters a formal Treatability Variance petition
complying with the requirements of 40 CFR 268.44 for site-
specific variances. Because most removal actions involve
off-site actions, OSCs will generally have to prepare formal
Treatability Variance petitions, the process also should
local	«ii) an opportunity for public to
consistent with the proposed NCP administrative
record requirements.
Processes for obtaining a Treatability Variance depend
upon the type of removal action. These actions are
riassifird according to the expediency required in a given
titration: (1) emergency, (2) timeAzitical, and (3) non-
time-criticaL The process for obtaining a Treatability
Variance for each of these removal actions is described
below. Each of these actions are defined in Highlight 3.
Highlight 3 • DEFINITIONS1 OF EMERGENCY,
TIME-CRITICAL, AND NON-TIME CRITICAL
REMOVAL ACTIONS
Emergency - Emergency removal actions are those
responses to releases or threats of releases requiring
initiation of dean-up activity within hours of the lead
agency's	that a removal «"**"*»» is
appropriate.
Time-Critical - Time-critical removals are those
releases requiring initiation of on-site dean-up activity
within six mrmrh« of the agency's ^»?»rrw'"af"vn
that a removal action is appropriate.
Non-TIme-Critlcal • Non-time-critical removals are
those releases or threats of releases that do not
require initiation of on-site dean-up activity within six
,	of lead agency's *t»f»wiiiiiarirm Aaf a
removal- action is appropriate.
^ Defined in pretmble to propmed NCP.
Emergency and Time-Critical Aajma
There is no formal procedure Cor identifying and
analysing alternatives for emergency time-critical
removal acriom. Because of the need for a quick f«p"nv^
to a release, the removal action selection process may occur
at different stages of these removals, depending an the
threats present
Generally, a request for a Treatability Variance is a
mcmnr""*11™ »ttaeh*A to the Action Memorandum. During
emergency and some time-critical responses, however, there
may not be sufficient information available about the
for a Treatability Variance when the Action Memorandum
is signed. In those cases, the request for a Treatability
Variance should be a m»w»nran« that wiQ aid in determining whether an LDR
requiiement is applicable and selecting a recommended
action. The EE/CA process - is similar to the RI/FS
process and generally indudes sot steps:
Highlight 5 • SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR THE
EE/CA
D« grind cm of Alternatives:
This removal alternative will comply with the
LDRs through a Treatability Variance under
40 CFR 268.44. This Variance will result in
the use of [specify technolop) to attain the
Agency's interim "treatment levels/ranges" for
the contaminated soil at the site.
Evaluation of Alternatives:
The LDRs are applicable and can be
practicably met for [Enter number] of [Enter
total number of alternatives] removal
alternatives being considered. [Enter number]
of die [Enter total number of alternatives]
alternatives would comply with the LDRs
through a Treatability Variance.
-------
HOW TO COMPLY WITH A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
FOR SOIL AND DEBRIS WASTES
So3 Wa*™
Once the OSCs have identified the RCRA waste coow.
present at the site, the nes step is to identify the BDAT
miHtMiHut requiting control and to divide these
constituents into one of the structural/functional groups
shown in	1 of Highlight 6. After dividing the
BDAT	{mo their respective stracmral/fiinaionaJ
groups, the nes step is to compare the concentration of
each constituent with the threshold concentration (see
3 of	6) and to select the appropriate
level or percent redaction range. If the
EDgUiflfak 6 - ALTERNATE TREATABILITY VARIANCE LEVELS AND
TECHNOLOGIES FOR STRUCTURAL/FUNCTIONAL GROUPS
Structural
Functional
Qroupe
Concentration
Range
(ppm)
Threshold
Concentration
(ppm)
Percent
Reduction
Range
Technctogica that achieved
recommended effluent
concentration guidance*"



ESSSiH

HdQQflfUttd
Non-Pear
Arornaflca
OS -10
100
90-90J
Blotoqral Traaenant Low Tama Stnpomg.
Sal Washing. Thannai Oaseucoon
Otaona
000001 -oos
OS
90->99J
OeUHOrtnaDcn. Sod Wasmng, Tharmal Oestruc&on
pea*
ai -io
100
90-909
Blotagtcai Traatnent Oecrtcroueon. Sod Wasrtng.
Thaimai Oaseucaon
H6ftfdd88
0002-002
02
90 - 99.9
.Thannai Oaseuetton
HilOQIflMBfl
PtWIQlS
05-40
400
90-99
Bctogcai Traasnam. Low Tamo. Stripping.
Soi waaning. Ihamial Osssueaon
Hotoganaaa
AitoMies
05-2
40
95-909
Traaenant Low Tamp. Ssipping. Soil Wasmng.
Thermal Oaeeucaon
Hatogenned
. CyeScs
05-20
200
90-909
Tharmat Oas&ucaon
Nibxunj
AfOmflttCS
£5 -10.0
10000
99-9099
BlotogirH Traaemnt Sod Wasmng
TharmM Dastrucacn
ttatarocyc&cs
05-20
200
90°9O9
Sotoqirat Traaenant Law Tamp. Stripping. Sod Wasmng,
Th«ma< Oassucocn
PotynueMir
Aiamadce
05-20
400
95-909
Btatogicet Traaenant Law Tamp. Stnppng, Sod Wasmng,
Themrni Oeseueoon
Othar Polar
Organic#
05-10
100
90-909
Traaenant Low Tamp. Shpping. Soil Wasmng.
Thermal Oaseueaon


AnSmony
01-02
2
90-99
	Mi alii in
Araane
027-1
10
90-909
uiniuuuuiui sw wuiuiHj
Barium
01-40
400
90-99

Chromium
0.5-8
120
96 - 99.9

NkciwS
05-1
20
98-99J
uiBimiiiMiMi 909 wasmng
Satanum
0.005
0.08
90-99

Vanadium
02-22
200
90-99
(rrvnodttatton
Laao
* z
0.1-3
40
300
90«» 99.9
99-99J

Marcuy
00002-0.008
OOB
90-99
Immodcteatton
* TCLP aito way da igad *nriuam{mw» wtrt wtawnfr lam lattb oforgama Oua )mn tiw wm miomjt an iiiwrfmimmm
"* Odor udmoJopu mmyb* uiad if trtatabibtf mirfitl or 8tWin|Uii»iiiiiii —
¦	Site <^»MTKtepraf*n,t*
¦	Identification of removal action objectives;
¦	Identification of removal action alternatives;
¦	Analysis of removal action alternatives;
a Comparative analysis of resggaal action alternatives;
and
¦	Recommendation.of removal action alternative.
For non-time-critical removals, the information to justify
a Treatability Variance should be included in a
memorandum attached to the EE/CA. Public comments
on the Treatability Variance should be solicited for a period
of at least 30 days when the EE/CA is made available, in
accordance with the	record, requirements in
the proposed NCP.
-------
concentration of the restricted cumumwn is less tl the
threshold- concentration, the waste should be treated to
within the """•'¦'frimi range. Ifwaste
is above the threshold, the waste	be treated to
reduce the wnoq^jmiwi of the waste to the
percent reduction range. Ones XSSt appropriate treatment
range is selected, the third step is to identify and select a
specific technology that can achieve the necessary
concentration or percent redaction. fnhtmn 5 of Highlight
6 lists	that (based on —performance
data) can attain the alternative Treatability Variance levels.
For	artiwwc ilnrinj fh» jppUiiiMHhnii gf r)i»
seleaed treatment technology, periodic analysis using the
appropriate testing procedure (Le^ total.waste analysis for
organic* and TGLP for inorganics) will be required to
ensure that the alternate treatment levels for the BDAT
miKiimwiH requiring control are being attained, a*"^ fhw«,
can be land-disposed without further treatmenL
Because of the variable and uncertain characteristics
associated with mi excavated wastes, from which only
campling data are available, treatment systems generally
should be designed to achieve the more stringwit end of the
treatment range (**;, QJ for «-twYwwmwi, jee rnhnnn 2 of
Highlight 6) to ensure that the treatment residuals from the
most contaminated portions of the waste fail below the 'no
earifgdanni* levels (e.g., 6jQ ppm for chromium). Should
dan indicate that the treatmeat levels set through the
Treatability Variance are not being attained (Le., treatmeat
residuals are greater than the "no	level), OSCs
should consult with Headquarters.	8 provides a
specific case wantplr to illustrate how to obtain a
Treatability Variance.
Wastes
OSCs should use the same process described above for
obtaining a Treatability Variance for types of debris that are
able to be treated to the alternate-	levels (* g.
paper, plastic). However, for most types of debris (e^,
concrete, steel pipes}, which generally cannot be treated.
OSCs should use best management practices. Depending on
the specific characteristics of the debris, these practices may
mrtnrin decontamination (e^, triple rinsing) or destruction.
SUMMARY
Because of the important role the LDRs may play in
Superfund removals, early in the removal process, OSCs
need to incorporate the necessary investigative and analytical
procedures to determine if the LDRs are ARARs for on*
site removal alternatives that involve the "placement" of
wastes, and if compHaitnr with the LDRs is practicable.
When the LDRs are ARARs and compliance is practicable
(or for off-site actions, when LDRs are applicable'). OSCs
should determine if treatment processes can attain either the
LDR treatment standards or the alternate levels chat would
be	under a Treatability Variance.
Once removal alternatives are identified. OSCs should
determine if alternatives involve placement of restricted
RCRA wastes, and if so, identify the BDAT constituents
requiring control. Next. OSCs should evaluate those
alternatives that involve treatment and placement of
restricted RCRA hazardous wastes to ensure the technology
processes) will attain the appropriate treatment levels (Le..
either the LDR treatment standard or Treatability Variance
alternate treatment levels for restricted RCRA hazardous
wastes), and, in accordance with Superfund goals, reductions
of 90 percent or greater for Superfund primary contaminants
of concern). If a Treatability Variance is necessary, a
request for a Variance must be made in the Action
Memorandum (or in an amendment to the Action
Memorandum) and EE/CA Report, and public comment
solicited. The results of these evaluations are also
documented in the Action Memorandum and EE/CA
Report. The integration of the LDRs into the removal
actions is iSnstrated in Highlight 7.
Highlight 7 - LDRs IN THE REMOVAL PROCESS
-------
HIGHLIGHT 8: CASE EXAMPLE:
IDENTIFICATION OF TREATMENT LEVELS FOR A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
thai xaUs in one location at a ate wwuin F006 wastes and cresots (which site
found in soils it a teparata lomiian. Cadmium. chromium. lead, and arsenic were
The coiumnwon nan of ail of tte conanuena found at the ate inrludrrt-
Ai pan of the nuawil mvcstigaaaa it ha
adieus were an P004 mn). Aoenie ato
ts nmnminanw found in the highest
Ibat
fm/to).
TCLP
JmSL
Toad
fTr*"—*	(msfti)
TOP
JbBL
Ojwwmkmi
Cyanides
Lead
Z27D. 1&200
3460. 4J90
80. 120
soo - as
CO • 146
30- X
1.	16
2.	124
- «¦ '
PnGBn
Cicsois
Astnic
100-140
1 • 3
50.600
800. L900
1 - 6J
3S~ 4
3-9
H»ee removal altemarivea an being coniiriwtrrt: (1) Low rumpeiature ihcrmal mipping of sofi eonammated with aesols followed by
witMliminn of tte ash; (2) SlaWlirinnn of tte nil in a mobile unic and (3) In-«tu uahillminw Each of these alternative* must be evaluated
» dntnmiiini if ttey will result in	¦» reduction of tte toxicity, mobility, or volume of tte waste: whether "placement* ocean: and. if
'placcmcut' occua. whether tte anainii mil'main LDR treatment staadatds or alternative ariimrnl levels cttaIrtishrri through a Treatability
Variance for tte BOAT consmuenu lequixiug control.
STEP I: IDENllPY THE RESTRICTED CONSXZTUENES
¦	Because F006 and POM wastes tew been identified at tte site, tte Supetfund rite managirr must meet the treatment standards or alternate
treatment levels rwahlnlirrt through a Treatability Variance for tte BOAT conaitmrnn. These ccwsrimems ire: Cadmium, Chromium, Lead.
NickeL SBm and Q«da for F006 and **'--'¦*¦ for FOOl
AND DIVIDE THB 00N5IXXUENXS INTO THEIR STRUCTURAL/FUNCTIONAL GROUTS (see	6):
¦	All of the P006 constituents are in tte Tnmganra anmutal/ftinninnsl group.
¦	Cicsois an in tte Otter Mar Organic Compounds suwiutal/ftincrional group.
¦	In arrwrtamw with program goals, tte p«£mii»i remedy alio should remit in tte efltaive reduction (Le. at least 90 percent) of all primary
STEP 2CQMPARB1HBC0NCENIBA33ON THRESHOLD FOUND IN HKxHUOST 6 TO THE CONCENTRATIONS FOUND AT THE
gm AND fflOOSE EITHER THE CONCENTRATION LEVEL RANGE OR PERCENT REDUCTION RANGE FOR EAOl
RESTRICTED COtSniUENL
Sm	Thirshiitd	Appropaam Range	Range to be alucwl
CoatDant rminniiiiiuu r
40 ppm
30-
56 ppm
<
120 ppn
2 .
123 ppm
. <
300 ppm
1 •
&3 ppm
<
20 ppm
50 -
600 ppm
>
100 ppm
r is
>4ppm


X
X
X
95-99.9 Percent Reduction (TCLP)
0J • 6 ppm CTCLPl
0.1 - 3 ppn (TCLP)
(L5 • 1 ppm (TCLP)
X	90-99.9 Percent Reduction (TCLP)
Percent reductions for otgamcs based on tuMataaa have not been developed yet. Percent reductions oased on total waste assumed tor
-------
-ft EPA
United saw
Gnwonrmnul PtuquKjii
AQwey 	
Office ot
Solid Wast* and
EfTWQarcy Response
Oirectwe: 93*7 3-CflFS
Oecemoer 1969
Superfund LDR Guide #7
Determining When Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs) Are Relevant
and Appropriate to CERCLA
Response Actions
CERCLA Section 121(d)(2) specifies that oa-ute Superfund remedial actions shall attain 'other Federal standards,
requirements, criteria. limitations, or more stringent State requirements that are determined to be legally applicable
or relevant and appropriate (ARAR) to the specified circumstances at the site.' Ia addition, the National Contingency
Plan (NCP) requires that	removal actions attain ARAR* to the extent practicable. Qff-sitc removal and
remedial actions must comply with legally applicable requirements. This guide outlines the process used to determine
whether the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) land disposal restrictions (LDRs) established under
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) are "relevant and appropriate' to an on^itt CERCLA response
actios. (See Superfund LOR Guide #5 for determining when LDRs are applicable to CERCLA response actions.)
The guide also provides examples of when the LDRs are likely to be relevant and appropriate and when they are not.
With respect to contaminated soil and debris, EPA is umifrt airing a rulemaking to establish specific LDRs; until this
rulemaking is completed, EPA generally win sot consider the LDRs to be relevant and appropriate for soil and debris
contaminated with hazardous substances that are not RCRA restricted wastes. More detailed guidance on Superfund
compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).
LDR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE
DETERMINATIONS
For on-rite CERCLA responses that constitute
placement, aad for which the LDRs haw been,
determined not to be applicable (La, the wastes being
placed are not prohibited or restricted RCRA wastes),
site managers should evaluate whether the LDRs are
relevant and appropriate. As discussed ia the
CERCLA Camaliaaeg with Other Ln» Maaml fEPA.
August 8, 1968), relevant aad appropriate dedsions
require best professional jnd^neat of ste-spcctfic
factors to determine whether a lequitement addresses
problems or	tuflkianriy similar to the
arcuautaaces of the release, or remedial y*"*
contemplated, aad it wtitaated to the site, aad
therefore, is both inknaut aad appropriate.
Section 300.400(g)(2) of the proposed NCP [33 FR
at 51436 (December 21, 1988)1 ourfiaes a number of
factors pertaining to CERCLA timarinns aad pofmrial
ARARs which should be compared to determiae
whether a lequiiemcat is both relevant aad
appropriate. The bar pewinr ut factors to compare
whin evaluating the pofmrial relevaace aad
appropriateness of the LDRs are: (1) the action or
activities regulated by the requirement (e^, placement
oa the laad) aad the remedial action contemplated; (2)
the purpose of cherequirement aad the purpose of the
CERCLA action; (3) the whstancw regulated by the
requirement aad the substances found at the CERCLA
site; aad (4) the medium regulated or affected by die
requirement aad the medium contaminated or affected
at the CERCLA site. - These factors are evaluated to
determiae whether the circumstances of the release
aad ftmntial actios contemplated are such that use of
the LDR teqmlrtutents ia well-suited to CERCLV
response olgculies.
The evaluation of the	Qf » release
is rrmrtnrrrd as part of the remedial investigation,
during which information is collected oa contaminant
sources, p"*—routes of migration, and potential
humaa and environmental receptors of concern. The
results of this effort (which is ultimately documented
ia the site characterization aad baseline risk assessment
chapters of the RI/FS report) are used to establish
remedial action objectives for the areas or media
at the site that pose a threat to human
heafth aad the environment. The site*spccific
CERCLA response ubjeoam of the remedial action
should be compared with the purpose or
objectives of the LDRs as a first step ia determining
the »«¦* relevaace and appropriateness of the
LDRs (proposed NCP factors (a) aad (e)].
. The objective of the LDRs is to achieve
reductions ia the toxicity aad/or mobility of a
-------
hazardous waste, based on application of the best
demonstrated available technology (BDAT), prior to its
land disposal- While this objective will often be
compatible with remedial alternatives	to
destroy highly concentrated, toxic, and mobile materials
such as liquids, other remedial alternatives involving
treatment of the principal threats of a site may have
different objectives co which the LDRs are not well*
suited.
Once a decision is made that achieving BDAT
reductions in the toxicity and/or mobility of a waste
source is compatible with CERCLA response objectives
for the site, site managers should utilize information on
waste constituents and matrices collected as part of the
site characterization to evaluate whether a CERCLA
waste is "sufficiently similar" to a fisted RCRA waste
code or family of waste codes (e£* K04S-KQ52,
petroleum refining wastes) such that the LOR standard
for that waste code is appropriate for the CERCLA
waste.
In determining whether a CERCLA waste is
sufficiently similar, managers
whether the BOAT used to set the LDR standard
would be effective for the CERCLA waste.
(Technologies other than those used to set the BDAT
standards may be considered, although they must be
regarded as capable of meeting the promulgated
concentration requirements.) Although a constituent*
by-constituent analysis is not necessary for relevant
and appropriate determinations, a general comparison
of the waste constituents and matrices is useful for
identifying waste codes to which a CERCLA waste may
be similar, and therefore, helpful in the identification
of technologies that may be appropriate for
consideration.
If a CERCLA waste that consists of a complex
mixture of several different wastes occurs in a different
medium (e.g., soil) or matrix (BDAT standards may be
established for specified matrices, such as wastewaters,
oonwastewaters, or both) from what is specified for a
particular restricted waste code or rrmtthn
incompatible waste continents, use of BDAT may sot
be appropriate for that waste, and therefore, the LDRs
NOTE: If the LDRs are determined to be
relevant and appropriate requirements for a
CERCLA action (Le^ there is a dose match
between the CERCLA and LDR objectives, and
a close match between the constituents/matrix of
the CERCLA waste and the constituents/matrix
of the relevant RCRA waste code), but the
treatment process involved in the remedy does
not achieve BDAT levels in the field as
anticipated, a Treatability Variance establishing
alternate treatment levels should be sought
would not be relevant and appropriate [proposed NCP
factor (b)J. It has been the experience of the
Superfund program that Treatability Variances art
frequently necessary for soil and debris contaminated
with a restricted RCRA waste (see Superfund LDR
Guide #6A), because the promulgated LDR standards
are based on treating less complex matrices of
industrial process wastes. As a logical corollary to this
finding; the Agency believes that LDRs generally would
not be "relevant and appropriate* requirements for soil
and debris contaminated with aon-tvCRA restricted
wastes. However, the Agency plans to undertake a
rulemaking that win prescribe applicable standards for
the treatment of sod and debris contaminated with
RCRA-restricted wastes. In the future, these standards
may be relevant and appropriate to the treatment of
soil and debris contaminated with non-restricted wastes.
Examples illustrating the relevant and appropriate
determination process follow;
¦ A number of drums containing hazardous wastes
are discovered during a site investigation.
Although no written documentation or specific
knowledge of the source is available to identify
with certainty the origins of the wastes, the
laboratory analyses indicate that they contain very
high concentrations of a predominantly liquid
waste indicative of industrial waste streams.
Therefore, maximum destruction of the drum
contents is established as the remedial acti<
objective. Due to the general similarity of th.
bulk liquids to the spent solvents listed in the
F001-F005 waste codes, the CERCLA site
manager determines that use of incineration (oae
' of the BDAT identified in the solvent and dionn
rule for that family of waste codes) would be
technically suitable. Therefore, the LDRs would
be relevant and appropriate for an alternative
involving the treatment and placement of the
drummed waste.
a A CERCLA waste mixture from an unknown
source is found to consist of wastes similar to
F021 dioxin-containing wastes (Le., they contain
cqwyjftf«if« found in dw««i,u
-------
-------
Names and Locations op Commercial
Facilities Operating in 198*
-------
Names and Locations of Commercial
Facilities Operating in IS8*
Treatment
FaclTftv (IMW
Location
EPA f.0. Wo.
Combustion:
Incinerators
Combustion:
Kilns
AlchenvTran, Ina
BOT.Ina
CaldweB Systsma toe
Chsmicai Wasts Mansgemsnt Ine.
Chemical Warts Management Ina
ChamJcal Wast* Management, Ine.
Cnvirosafe Service of Texss
Gwtoesmental Systems Co.
Cleveland, CWo
Clarence, New York
Lenoir, North Carolina
EtneBs, Alabama
Sauget, Iffineis
Port Arthur, Texas
<3SX Thermal Oxidation Cotp.
IT Cor*
LWO, Ina
IWO, Ina
Omega Chemical Cop.
Radum Petroleum Ca
nouni Divuuinntvnii wffYvss
Rofina Environmental Services
Rofins Environmental Services
Roes Iwuineraitart Servicee, Ina
SCA Chemical Servicee, Ina
Gauffer Chemical Ca
Sautter Chemical Ca
Stauffer Chemical Ca
Thermal Kem, Ina (formerly Stables)
Aeh Grove Cadence
Aah Grave—foreman Cement
Aeh Grave Cftanute
Sue CIrde Atlantic Cement Ca
CinflnsSofits
Copley Cement Co
Florida Sofite
General Portland (Syatoc)
General Portland Cement
General Portland/LaFarge Ca
GSX Services of South Carafes
Ideal Cement Co
International Matrt Reclamation. Ca
VeoiiMiM ilnBle
MraUCKy 90189
i Portland Camem
Grser, South Carafes
Roebuck, S. Caraflna
Martinez, California
Calvert City, Kentucky
Clay, Kentucky
Whttler, California
Kansas Oty, Msaouri
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Bridgeport New Jersey
Deer Park, Texas
Grafton, OMo
IHnrrfs
Martinez, California
Baton Rougo, Louisiana
Houston, Texas
Roekhifl, South Carafes
Loutsvffle, Nebraska
Foreman, Arkansas
Chanuta Kanaaa
Ravenna New York.
Logsnsport, Indians
GreertCove Spring, Fl
Lebea California
Fredcnie, Kanaaa
Paulding. Ohio
Pfaewood, South Carolina
Satatoga Arkansas
Braoka, Kentucky
Bath, Penneytvanis
LafargsrtSsnsrai Portlsnd (Syatso)
LaWgh Portland Centers Ca
Marino Shaio Processors, tna
MM Forids Mining Ca
Natrsgansett Improvement Ca
NorttsCorp.
Oglssby Cemsnt Plant
Ohio Lima tna
San Juan Cement Ca
Corp,
Southwestern Portland Cemsnt
VUgtmaSofits
Camsntan. New Yortt
Morgan C8y, louisiait*
Lowefl, Rorida
Provldanea Rhods lafd
San Juan, Puerto Woo
Anoxia, Virginia
Fairbom, Ohio
Cascade, Virginia
0H098C539438
NYG0QC632372
NC0QS6871282
ALDQ00622464
. 1LQ098642424
TC00Q0838894
TCD980748107
ARO069748192
SC0058754789
SC0003380393
CA0000094771
KYD087438817
KYDO88438874
CAC042245001
M00073QZT609
LA0010395127
NJC053288239
TXDG55141378
OHO04S415665
ILD000672121
LA0008161234
TXD009099079
SCQ044442333
NED007260672
AR0981S12270
KS0031203318
NYD002Q69557
NC0003152642
INOC05081542
FLO004059083
CATC80C31S28
KS0980633259
0HD005048947
SCO070375985
ARD065316937
PA0087361015
KYD059568220
PA0002389S59
ALD981019048
OHO0Q5O48947
NYD055735807
LA09810S7708
FLD991275355
Rt0006807911
NY008046993S
1L098C613475
No IO assigned
PRM80S2S11S
VA04027S082
0HD981196779
No IO assigned
vi
-------
Treatment	ftdtttv ww
Location
EPA I.D. No.
Eaat Perm Manufacturing Co. Ina
GNS. Incorporated
GN8. Incorjwrated
Qui Coast Lead Ca
New Jersey Zna Ca
Sanders Load Co, Ina
Schuyfcfl Metais Corp
Sundvd Muatriaa
Stabilization
Afchem Tron
American Wad
BHS he
CasouBa Resouieoe
Cecos International Ina
Ceeoa bitamatenai, Inc.
Cacaa International, Ina
Caooa International Ina
Caeoa Intamatienai, Ina
Caeoa International, IneJBFl of 8.
Caeoa 1TN Qulfweat
Chew-met Servicee Ina
Chemical Conversion of Georgia
Chemierf Pollution Control
Chemical Processors Ina
Chemied Wasta Management
Chemni Waste Management
Chemieil Wasta Management
Chemical Waste Management, Ina
Chemtron Corp.
OOLandfa
Cresby A Overton Ina. Plant 2
Delaware Container Co, Ina
Diversified Sya Ina Storage Faa
Drug 4 Laboratory Oisposai Ina
East Coaat Environ. Service Corp.
Ecotctee, Ina
6>a» Chemical 4 Supply Ca
UIWIW WQfpb
EnvtafunMUi EnMprisM, Iml
BimnnMm nun ntwm
Polutton Control Ina
GSX Services, Ina
HuhBChemCarp
IT Corp Deriida
KyanaOl.tna
EfcCtuy Columbia Corp.
Mchigan Oiapoaal Ina
Northeast Environmental
Northland Chemical Ca
Omega Chemical Corp.
Oaeo Treatment Systems, Ina
Pacific Treatment Corp.
Peoria Oiapoaal Ca
Lyona Station, PA
FrtaoaTO
Loa Angela CA'
Tampa, R.
EBwood C8y. PA
rVMrVni V*A
Troy, AL
SanAnaonfaTC
Part Wayne, M
Cleveland, OH
Maywood.IL
Wright C9y, MO
Santa Maria, CA
Commerce City, CO
Livingston. LA
Cbtdnnatf,OH
WSSamsburg, OH
Bristol. CT
Roseta, L
Houston, 7X
>**¦	-1-^ , |M
nyniuuiiii mi
Vaidosta, OA
Bay Shore, NY
Seattle, WA
Newark, HJ
Sulfur. LA
Kettleman City, CA
Avon, OH
Calumet C3y, IL
Kent, WA
CeatsvSaPA
Athens, IN
	» IM
nViWII) Ml
New Haven, CT
OaytomOH
Houston, TX
York, PA
Cincinnati, OH
Watarbuiy, CT
Independence, OH
Qreer.SC
Reidsvflo.NC
BanidaCA
Cobras PA
Louisvtfa. KY
Waahougsi,WA
Oearbom,Kti
Devon, NY
Warwick, m
Whitfer.CA
Columbia, TN
SanOlegaCA
Peoria IL
vU
PA000233016S
TXDQ064S1Q9O
CA00978S1541
PLD004092839
PA0087S6101S
PA0002395887
ALD046481032
MO0030712822
7X099070968S
M0078911144
OH0980S69438
ILOQQ0716894
M00063S21228
CA002074812S
COO991300484
LA0000618298
OHOQ00816629
OHO 037433744
CTD000604488
ILO980700728
7X0980864078
MD096963194
GA0093380814
NY008278S429
WA002025794S
NJ0Q8921679Q
AL0000622464
LA0000771201
CAT000646117
OH0066060S09
IL0010284248
WA0991281787
PA0064375470 •
TN0034547141
MI009294792S
CT0089631956
OHC980700942
TXD074196338
PA0010154043
OHOO83377010
CT0072138969
OHOOS5S22429
SCOOS8754789
SC007Q37S98S
NC00006484S1
OH0001926740
CA0000060012
PA000064773S
KY0000821942
WA009230Q2SQ
MI0000724831
NY0057770109
R100400983S2
CA00422460Q1
TN 0980315779
CA0095894S56
IL000080S812
-------
Treatment
Paelltty namo
LflMtlWI
EPA I.D. Ho.
Stabilization
(aant'd)
Pstiuiouin Waste Ina
Solvent Recovery
Queen C8y Banal Ca
Ho Bin i Environmental Suvicii
Refine Envbonl S«v. of TX, toe.
SAW Wast*, Ina
Solvent Services Ina
Southern Chemical Redlining, ha
T«m	ine,
TW*State Steel Oram Co, Ina
ILS. Ecology Ina
USPCI
USPCI Grassy ML Fac3ty
Wastes Research Ine.
AS Worth Enterprisea
Attentate Energy Reseuicee
American Resource Recovery Corp.
Arivee Chemicals Ina
Avganio Industrlee
Boon»Blakesiae Ina
Bayday Chemical
Berkley Products Co* Ine.
Buda Oi Service Ina
Century 01 Ina
Chem Pik Corp.
Chemdene Corp.
Chemicai Waste Management
Chemtran Corp.
Chief Chemical A Supply Ina
Gayton Chemical Ca
Clean Herbora of Braintree Ina
Davie Chemical
Oelawore Container Co. tna
Detres Chemical Ind. Ina
Oiez Refinery Ca
Earth Industrial Waste Managl Ina
Ecoictea Ina
Bte Chemierf & Supply Ca
Enterprise Reooveiy System Ina
Environmental Prawning Setvicea
UIIUQWK
General Chemical Corp.
Holchem OBA Service Chemicsi
HukaQtetnCoip
nyviuuiuui nvcycws im
Industrial Solvents A Chemical Ca
Keystone ChemiesICa
KDMCa
KlorKIeenlna
Liberty Solvent A Chemical oa
MA J Solvents Co. Ina
M A M Chemical A Equip. Co, Ina
Mar*"*' Ina
MeGary Columbia Corpt
Milwaukee Solvents A Chem. Corp.
McKeeeen Envwosystema Ca
B*en8eld,CA
Ponce, PR
Cincinnati, OH
Baton Rouge, LA
Deer Park, TX
Kearny, MJ
SanJosaCA
Cape Girardeau, MO
QrayavBIa OA
Wayneka,OK
Stansbury Parfc, UT
East SL Louis. B.
Birmingham. AL
Memphis, TN
Oougiasvaia GA
Cottage Grave, W1
OewalL
Santa Gam,CA
Akron. PA
PhcenifcAZ
AWp.IL
Cranston. R1
Malvern, PA
EmeOaAL
Avon, OH
Haskefl,OK
Seuget, L
Kington, MA
LasAngelea.CA
CoatavSe, PA
LoeAngeiea,CA
Olez,AR
MMngton, TN
Dayton, QH
Houston, IX
Tonawanda, NY
Framingham, MA
KBgora,TX
Orange. CA
Bedford. OH
Tulsa OK
Yorit Haven, PA
Colmar.PA
San Antonio, TX
Cincinnati, OH
TVrinsbwg,OH
Atlanta* GA
AttaOa AL
Middlesex MJ
Wtotwugal,WA
Menomonee Falls, Wl
CAM8067327B
PR009101S622
OH0004477634
LA001039S127
TX0CSS14137S
NJ099129110S
CACCS9494310
M0098Q632954
TXD069482340
NVT330010000
OKOQ6S4S8378
VrrD99190174«
L0980700744
ALD094478793
GAC033502461
TN09912794S0
GA099Q740714
WB000808824
ILD091973Q68
CAT08OQ12263
PA00030C3894
AZD049318009
10099215303
RI00848C2842
PA00143S344S
ALO000622464
OH0066060609
QK0089761290
10066913327
MA0039322220
CA007021S3SS
PA0064375470
CA0020161642
AR009291S735
TNC000614321
GH0980700942
TX0074196338
MS000069317S
NJ0000808S88
NYD038641601
MA0019371079
TX0000742304
CAT000812333
0H00Q1928740
OKOOQQ632737
PA0098732118
PA000064773S
TX00S2849027
OHO980821862
OHOOS2324S48
GA004582117Q
ALD070513757
NJ00Q24S4S44
WA00923CQ250
W10023350192
PR009039971S
viii
-------
Treetment
Psollltv name
Location
6PA 1.0. Mo.
Solvent Recovery
(cont'd)
Wastewater Treat*
want of Organic*
Northland Chemical Co.
01A Solvent Process C&
Ofl A Solvent Process Ca.
Organic Chemieaia Inc
Padfie Treatment Coipi
nlBlfl MlflfUa ML
Prido Solvents and Cham. Cc,tnc
Rho-ChamCorpi
RnchemCo.
Safety*KIecA
Safety Maen Corp. Chicago R.C.
Safety-Ween Corp. Clayton RC.
Safety Ween Envirosyttems
SM Adenine.
Sol-Pro/Lflyblad
Solvent Recovery Corp.
Solvent Recovery Service d NJ
Solvent Recovery Seivics of NE
Solvent Resource Recovery Inc.
Solvent Service Inc
Southeastern Chemical and Solvent
Southern Chemieai Reclaiming Inc.
Spectral Inc.
Tri-State Steel Oram Co* Inc.
U.S. Steel Chemieais Co. inc
Unitek Environmental Servicea Inc.
Voda Patmleum Co.
Washington Chemical Inc
Waste Research A Redam.Cc. Inc
Wastes Research Inc
B-T/Energy Paeffiy
Casmafla Resources
International Inc
International. Inc
Bcoletec Inc
gmpak Inc Oeer Park
Environmental Processing Services
Erfewsy PoSution Control, Inc
Intercontinental Ternwtaie Cc
ITCorp. Vine Wi
Omega Chemical Corp.
Qsco Treatment Systems, Inc
RoSna EnwooServicaa of "DC, Inc
WViral nICBVi*/ 4CivU QT rW
Waste Research A Redam, Co, Inc
West Babylon, NY
Warwick, Rl
CA
<3randvffle,MI
SanOtsgcCA
AJhambra, CA
West Babylon. NY
tngiewood.CA
Phoenix, AZ
East Palo Ate, CA
Fort Wayne IN
Bgfc.0.
Toledo, OH
MoxeeCay, WA
Kansas dty, MO
Linden, NJ
Southington. CT
West CafroMon, OH
San Jose, CA
Sumter, S6
Cape GrarWeau.MO
Bkton, MO
GraysviUe, OA
RoseviiJe, Ml
Honolulu. HI
Long View. TX
Spokane, WA
Eau ©aire, Wl
East SL Louis, IL
Leuisvflle. KY
Santa Maria, CA
Cincinnati, OH
Niagara Falls, NY
Oayton,OH
Houston. TX
Oayton,OH
Independence, OH
Oeer Park. TX
Marines, CA
Whittier, CA
Columbia. TN
Oeer Park, TX
Linden, NJ
EauOave, WI
NYOQS7770109
R0O4OC983S2
COC980591184
CAC008302903
MI099Q8S8CC3
CA009S8945S8
CAO089446710
NY0QS7722284
fiMnntw vra
AZD980892731
CA0CQ94S2SS7
LD980613913
UOQOS48Q697
NJ0069039624
KYOQS3348108
OH098Q586804
WA0027543032
"MO0GC0610768
NJCC02182897
CTD009717504
OH009394S293
CAOOS9494310
SC0038273826
M00980632954
MOOOQQ218Q08
MI000652338S
H(T0006035U
TX0061287918
WA0037991528
WC990829473
ILO980700744
KY0000057190
CA0020748129
0HGQ0Q816629
NY0080336241
OH09807C0942
TX0097873149
OH0000608S88
OH009SS20429
CAG0C0094771
CA004224S001
TN0980515779
TXOOS5141378
NJ0QQ2182897
WI099082947S
Waatewater Treat-
ment of Inorganlce
Attentate Energy Resourcaa
American Waste Processing Ltd.
Casmalia Resources
Cecoa Intematienal
Cecoa Intematienal Inc
Cham Waste Managsment
Chem-Cear Inc
Chem-Oear Inc
Augusta. GA
Maywood, IL
Santa Maria. CA
Bristol CT
Niagara Palls. NY
Newark, NJ
Chester, PA
Chieago. It
GA0033582461
LOOQQ716894
CA002074812S
CTDOOC604468
NY0080336241
NJD089216790
PA0000731026
1000C808471
i*
-------
Treatment
Psdlltv nsms
Location
EPA I.P. Mo.
CSHjndfiB
Cmsby * Ovwten, Ina PH2
CyaneKsm
Dynecoi Corporstsd
EeelotM, Ins.
EmMtsCoip.
EmWti Caip. _
SmfranmsiiUi EAtMpdM Iia
Frentkr Chem.Waste Pnocese, Ina
Heritsgs Env. Services (HES)
(TCoipi VinsHl
LQ Sante tatt. V'*— Pft
NOnVrnWI UIVIIUMIVMi ra
Qsco TrMtmanS Systems, Inc.
Psdfio Trsstmsnt Cotp.
f,PA
I	Hi
CahMMteSy.IL
fefltWA
Ml
Dayton, CH
WutMrator Trsst-
msnt of Orginlet
and Metals
Southern Caiillnnia Cham. Co. Inc.
Sosetrassiy Inc.
TH>Stats Stsai Oram Co. Inc.
a , _ i	
incn uiwmuiiiiuii Mrnon
Triefl Environmental Services
Tricfl Environmental Services
USPC1 Grassy ML Facffiy
Waste Conversion, lnc>
Prontiar Cham. Waste Process, Inc.
Solvent Recovery Com.
USPCI
YM, PA
Qndnna&OH
MagaraPaitaiNY
Giaar.SC
inuniiipoiyit in
Martinez, CA
Pittsburgh, PA
Seatte, WA
Columbia. TN
S«nOiego.CA
Pones. PR
Santa PS Springs, CA
Kearny. NJ
GraysviDs. <3A
Muskegon Heights, Ml
Dayton, OH
Anbodi,TN
Stansbury PsrKUT
Hatfield, PA
Niagara Paito, NY
Kansas Oty. MO
Wsynoka, OK
OHOOOOTZ41S3
PA0000731Q2S
NY0000691949
IL8010284248
WA0M1281787
M0O98O11992
MI00742S9S68
OH0980700942
CTD093816813
PA0010184048
OH0083377010
NYD043818703
SCOOS8754789
IN009321S012
CA0000094771
PA0004838148
WA00S8367152
TN0980515779
CA00958945S8
PR0091018622
NJ0049881892
MI007258S755
OHOOB1290611
TN0000772277
UTD9913Q1748
PAO0S5S90592
NY0043818703
M00000610786
0X0065438376
X
-------

-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, O.C 20440
NOV 131986
OMIC1 OP
souo wasti and iMenosNCv nespor
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT RCRA Regulatory Status of Contaminated Ground Water
FROM: Marcia E. Williams, Director
Office of Solid Waste
TO:
Patrick Tobin, Director
Waste Management Division, Region IV
This is in response to your memorandum of September 18,
1986, regarding the regulatory status of ground water
contaminated with hazardous waste leachate. To answer this
question, one first has to determine the status of ground
'water. Under the regulations, ground water contained in the
aquifer is not considered a solid waste, since it is not
"discarded" in the sense of being abandoned, recycled,
or inherently waste-like as those terms are defined in the
regulations. See 40 CFR 261.2(a)-(d). Therefore, contami-
nated ground water cannot be considered a hazardous waste
via the mixture rule (i.e., tro have a hazardous waste
mixture, a hazardous waste must be mixed with a solid waste;
see 40 CFR 261.3(a)(2)(iv)). Nevertheless, ground water
contaminated with hazardous waste leachate is still subject
to regulation since it contains a hazardous waste. Therefore,
the treatment, storage, or disposal of ground water contaminated
with hazardous waste leachate must be handled as if the
ground water itself were hazardous, since hazar33us waste 1/
leachate is subject to regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA.
However, if the ground water is treated such that it no
longer contains a hazardous waste, the ground water would no
longer be subject to regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA.
1/ This memo more precisely explains the position on ground
water contamination presented in John Skinner's memo dated
December 26, 1984.
-------
2
Taking this Interpretation and applying It to the example
in your memorandum, the ground water containing a listed
hazardous waste, once collected, Is subject to regulation
under the hazardous waste regulations. However, if as a
result of treatment, the ground water no longer contains the
hazardous waste leachate, the ground water would no longer be
subject to the hazardous waste rules.
Tour letter also raises the question of treatment of
ground water within the context of corrective action. If the
corrective action is taken at an interim status facility In
compliance with a §3008(h) order, treatment can take place.
We are considering the possibility of amending the regulations
to clarify the relationship between corrective action and
the reconstruction ban (§270.72(e)). More broadly, the
Agency Is currently examining the issue of whether permits
should be required for any corrective actions. We are also
developing miles for corrective action under RCRA §3004(u).
Until this analysis Is completed, If the corrective action
takes place at a permitted facility, it can be handled as a
permit modification.
Please feel free to cail Matt Straus, of my staff, if
you have any further questions; his telephone number is ^75-
8551 (FTS).
cc: Hazardous Waste Division Directors,
Regions I-III and V-X
Gene Lueero, OWPE
Lloyd Guercl, OWPE
Mark Greenwood, OGC
Steve Silverman, OGC
-------
(m)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20460
OFFICE OF
SOUO WASTE ANO EMERGENCY RESPOND
JAN 24 B89
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
Status o£ Contaminated Groundwater and Limitations
on Disposal and Reuse
'3-^ "K-
Sylvia K. Lowrance, Directo
Office of Solid Waste
Jeff Zelikson, Director
Toxics and Waste Management Division
Region XX
Xn your memo of December 16, 1988 and the attached
materials, you stated your understanding of the current policy
on the classification of contaminated groundwater and described
issues which have arisen in California regarding reuse of
contaminated groundwater from a Superfund site.
You have accurately stated the effects of the "contained
in" policy which governs situations such as the one you'have
described. Briefly, a contaminated groundwater which has been
treated such that it no longer contains hazardous constituents,
need not be considered to be a hazardous waste, and beneficial
reuse of the water is permissible. We have not yet issued
definitive guidance on levels below which the groundwater is no
longer considered to contain hazardous wastes. Until such
definitive guidance is issued, the Regions may determine these
levels on a case-specific basis.
It is our expectation that ultimately the guidance on
levels of hazardous wastes which may remain will mirror the
levels in the De Minimis rule which is now under development
by OSW. I know that Region XX has been participating in the
Work Group discussions and reviews of this proposal and X urge
you to continue this involvement.
Xn its present form, the De Minimis approach contemplates
levels based on health-based standards (where available),
assuming direct exposure. With respect to the constituents
of concern at the Fairchild Superfund site — trichloroethane
-------
2-
and dichloroethylene — the levels remaining in the treated
groundwater are well below the MCLs and would therefore be
consistent with the De Minimis approach.
If you have additional questions, please contact David Fagan
at FTS 382-4740. Questions on the Oe Minimis rule should be
addressed to Robert Scarberry at FTS 382-4770.
cc: Tina Kaneen
Henry Longest
-------

UNH KU&1AI fcS ENVffiOHMEWTAt PWLH EM I OH AOtlltl
REGION «
215 Framont Sfraal .
San Francisco. Ca. 94108
1 s DEC 1988
MgMQgANDTTM
SUBJECT: RCRA Classification of Contaminated Groundwater as a
Hazardous Waste and the Associated Limitations on
Disposal and Reuse at Superfund Sites
Thank you for meeting with me and officials from the State
of California during your visit here December 9, 1988. Consis-
tent with our discussion then, the purpose of this memorandum is
to bring to your attention the problems associated with reuse of
extracted groundwater during the remediation of a Superfund site.
As outlined in the November 13, 1986 memorandum, rcra
Regulatory Status of Contaminated Ground Water, from Marcia Wil-
liams to Patrick Tobin in Region IV, (memorandum attached)
groundwater which contains a hazardous waste must be handled as
if it were a hazardous waste, subject to Subtitle C of RCRA.
This definition seriously limits the disposal or reuse options of
extracted groundwater which falls below health based criteria.
It is our understanding that Headquarters has been working
to eventually restructure the definition'of hazardous waste to be
concentration based. However, we have some immediate and practi-
cal problems to solve which are associated with the drought in
California and the urgent need to reuse extracted groundwater
when it meets criteria set to protect health and environment.
Zn that regard, we want to advise you on how we are handling
a specific and urgent situation at the Fairchild, San Jose Super-
fund site. As is common in all arid regions, California depends
heavily on groundwater for water supply. Due to < ary real con-
cerns associated with managing this limited resource, the
California State Water Resources control Board has mandat' 1 that
the extracted groundwater at Fairchild be employed in a reuse
program. The groundwater proposed for reuse falls well below
risk criteria designed to protect health and the environment.
FROM:
TO:
Sylvia Lowrence, Director
Office of Solid Waste
-------
The main contaminant at the site, trichloroethane or TCA, is less
than 50 ppb; the MCL for TCA is 200 ppb. The attached memorandum
-from tfefcen McKinley to me, and correspondence with the State and
FairchiId, provide more detailed information about "the site and
these issues.
While we hope that the definition of hazardous waste for
aqueous mixtures can be converted to a concentration basis
reasonably soon, ve must address the Fairchild, San Jose problem
now, upon submission of adequate data on groundwater quality and
monitoring frequency which documents that all contaminants are
significantly below appropriate drinking water standards and
other environmental protection standards, ve intend to allow
Fairchild to participate in the reuse program. He would conclude
that the treatment has been sufficient to remove the hazardous
vaste from the vater and (consistent with the November 13, 1986
Marcia Williams memo) that the groundwater is no longer subject
to the hazardous vaste rules. We support this reuse program as a
part of the Superfund cleanup and consider it a critical feature
in the overall conservation of a precious resource, if you have
questions, please contact me (FTS 454-7460) or have staff contact
Amy Zimpfer (FTS 454-7414) or Phil Bobel (FTS 454-7480). Thank
you for your attention to this matter.
Attachments
cc: Henry Longest
Bruce Diamond
Matt Strauss
Bob Dellinger
Lloyd Guard
' Barbara McGulancss
-------
' ^3 \
^25
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
N80I0NIX
215 Fiwmcnt Street
San Francisco. Ca. 94105
CON'IDENTIA
L
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECTS Reuse of Sxtzaotad around Water During Remediation of
FROM:
THROUGH:
TO:
a Superfund site
Amy Zimpfer, Section Chief
fiAiith Ibiv 13a
-------
Pairchild began attractin? groundwater as an interim remedial
measure at its San Jose site in early 1982 after tlie discovery
that a waste solvent tank at the facility had failed. The
release contained VCKA regulated wastes.
Currently, groundwater extracted in the Fairchild cleanup
is discharged under an NPDES pexnit to the storm severs leading
to Canoas creek. NPDES discharges are exempt from RCRA regula-
tion. For a good many of the extraction wells, concentrations of
are sufficiently low to permit discharge in compliance
with proposed NPDES effluent limitations (30 ppb TCA and 1.5 ppb
DCS) without treatment. In fact, the residual chemical con-
centrations in these wells are well below the health based drink-
ing water standards (MCLs are 200 ppb for TCA and 7 ppb for DCE).
Another two-year dry period has raised water conservation
awareness in California. As in most of the arid west,
groundwater supplies are depended upon heavily. Fifty percent of
water supplied to users in the Silicon Valley area is drawn from
local aquifers. The Santa Teresa groundwater basin, where the
Fairchild remediation is talcing place, has dropped as much as 18
feet below normal water table levels. The XBM NPL site also ex-
tracts groundwater from this basin in its cleanup program.
The State Water Resources Control Board (created in 1969,
along with the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards, by the
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act which established a
statewide program for control of all the waters of the state) has
responded to the conservation concerns associated with
groundwater remediation in a March 1988 hearing on the "waste and
unreasonable use of water". This hearing prompted amendments to
the current state orders governing interim cleanup actions at X
and Fairchild. Specifically, it dictated the pumping rates and
number of extraction wells at Fairchild and IBM, and it required
both companies to incorporate reuse into their final cleanup
plans or show why it could not be done. In IBM's case th6
Regional Water Quality Control (RWQCB) has ordered 100% reuse in
the final cleanup requirements. It is expected that the final
orders from the RWQCB will include a similar directive for the
Fairchild site.
Additionally, the RWQCB has established priorities for dis-
chargers under their NPDES program (see attachment): first
priority is reuse, second priority is discharge to POTW, least
preferable is the discharge to storm drain or surface water. It
is clear that reuse and water conservation measures are high
priorities.
The Problem
Currently, it appears that EPA is responsible for the most
significant barrier to reuse. The problem lies in the RCRA
definition of the extracted groundwater as a hazardous waste.
The only existing guidance on this subject is contained in the
November 13, 1986 memorandum from Marcia Williams, Office of
Solid Waste, to Region IV (see attachment). This memorandum
-------
states that groundwater containing hazardous vaste in det stable
^¦ouafcs «nie» jge treated as though it vara a hazardous waste, sub*
ject to all treatment, storage and disposal requirements under
Subtitle c of RCRA.
In the Fairehild example, the company is negotiating with
the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") to
supply extracted groundwater for dust control and compaction at
Caltrans' road construction sites. The definition of the Fair-
ehild extracted groundwater as a hazardous waste, despite the
fact that chemical concentrations are below health based stan- -
dards, aakes this, and other reuse options such as irrigation, a
problem. Zf the groundwater is a hazardous waste, reuse by land
application appears to be precluded because under RCRA, hazardous
wastes may be disposed of only at permitted hazardous waste
facilities. Even if the RCRA prohibition on disposal outside of
licensed disposal sites did not apply, other RCRA requirement^,
such as manifesting, recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
would make supplying extracted groundwater to Caltrans or other
third parties an impractical alternative to discharge. Zn es-
sence, this prohibition effectively prevents reuse of the pumped
groundwater and encourages the unreasonable waste of a precious
resource in areas of the country where water supplies are limited
or uncertain. Attached is the recent correspondence outlining
the State and Fairehild positions regarding this policy, and our
Region IX response.
Proposed Solution
RCRA delisting of the pumped groundwater has been suggested
as an alternative to this predicament. However, as you are
aware, the process is lengthy and cumbersome. More importantly,
it appears that delisting was not intended for the situation ve
have described here. We believe that extracted groundwater, with
chemical concentrations that fall below criteria designed to
protect the health and environment should be easily incorporated
into conservation and reuse programs.
The recent meeting with Sylvia Lowrence and conversations
with Barbara McGuinness of Headquarters Office of Solid Waste in-
dicate that a more flexible reading of the,Marcia Williams Novem-
ber 13, 1986 memorandum is possible. Ms. McGuinness informed us
that Region ZV has used the memo to make judgment calls regarding
the application of RCRA to extracted groundwater. Zn at least
one ease, Region ZV has determined that an treated groundwater
was no longer a hazardous waste because hazardous constituents
were effectively removed sufficient to protect health and the en-
vironment. We perceive this to be a practical approach for the
purposes of reuse and the flexibility to apply the same "judgment
call" to Region XX Superfund sites, specifically the Fairehild
•ite, where chemical concentrations in groundwater are below
health-based criteria, and where a reuse program is critical to
the overall conservation of the resource.
-------
Mors specifically, the only conta Lnant det cted in the off-
site groundwater which is under consideration for reuse, is TCA
ic near «t bmmbm Mm so 99b <«r «m murfsr m ^ar
TCA which is 200 ppb). Zt is our belief that these numbers do
not pose health or environmental concerns for reuse in irrigation
or road construction programs. However, in order to specifically
analyze the appropriateness of the intended reuse of the
groundwater extracted at Palrchild we have requested that the
coapany provide the following data:
a.	Concentration ranges of all known contaminants in the
aquifer which will be pumped (influent quality) ?
b.	Concentration ranges of.all known contaminants in the
water intended for reuse (effluent quality);
« «
c.	The monitoring and reporting frequency which will be
used for each pollutant.
Provided that the water will meet all applicable requirements, ve
hope to develop a practical solution which will not delay reuse.
We are requesting Headquarters response to our proposed
solution by December 30, 1988. Specifically, we would like Head-
quarters to clarify that the November 1986 memorandum allows the
flexibility to determine that an extracted groundwater "no longer
contains a hazardous waste" if the hazardous constituents have
been removed sufficient to protect human health and the environ-
ment, and therefore "would no longer be subject to regulation un-
der Subtitle C of RCRA."
Attachments:
1.	KWQCB Policy
2.	1986 Marcia Williams memo
3.	Correspondence regarding the Fairchild Site (six letters)
-------
.tto 5%,
or 	 rj»

|	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20460
APR 6 I9SC
O^'CE OP
SOCIO WASTE ANO EMERGENCY RESPONSE.
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
CERCLA Response Activities and the Land Disposal
Restrictions Program's Applicability at Plattsburgh Air
Force Base
Sylvia K. Lowrance, Direct
Office of Solid Waste

Stephen D. Luftig, Director
Emergency and Remedial Response Division, Region II
In a memorandum of February 12, 1990, Region II raised
several questions about the applicability of the Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs) program to a remedial action at a DDT spill
site. In summary, Plattsburgh Air Force Base had stockpiled
high-grade DDT pesticide on a storage pad, beginning in 1970. By
1972, all of the drums had corroded and either spilled or leaked
onto the ground, adjacent to the pad. As a result, the soil is
currently contaminated with DDT, a halogenated organic compound
(HOC), in excess of 1000 mg/kg in some areas. The facility has
been listed on the National Priorities List.
In completing the study of the site, several cleanup options
are being evaluated. However during this consideration,
questions arose as to whether the options would satisfy the LDRs.
Specifically, you ask for clarification on capacity variances,
treatability variances, and whether the treated waste can be
redeposited on-site.
Capacity Variances
In the Third Third proposal, a national capacity variance is
not proposed for U061 (DDT); the Agency believes that sufficient
incineration capacity exists for treatment of halogenated organic
wastes. However, the proposal further states that where soil and
debris are contaminated with First, Second or Third Third wastes
with a BDAT treatment standard based on incineration, a two-year
national capacity variance will be granted.
During a national capacity variance, if the waste is not
treated in compliance.with the BDAT treatment standard and is
disposed of in a landfill or surface impoundment, the landfill or
Prinud on Rteycltd yr.ptr
-------
surface impoundment must meet the minimum technological
requirements (MTRs) of 40 CFR 264 Subpart N. In addition, durinc
a national capacity variance the waste must meet any applicable
standard (e.g., California list prohibition) that normally would
be superseded by a more waste-specific standard such as that for
U061.
Soil containing HOCs in excess of 1000 ppm is subject to the
LDRs via the California list prohibitions. (See Part 268,
Appendix III.) At CERCLA/RCRA corrective action sites, this soil
has a national capacity variance that expires on November 8,
1990. As a result-, soils containing HOCs above the prohibition
level may currently be disposed of in landfills or surface
impoundments that meet the MTRs. After November 8, 1990, the
soil must be incinerated in accordance with 40 CFR 268.42(a)(2),
or meet any alternative standard established through a
treatability variance.
Treatability Variances
Superfund's guidance document, "Obtaining a Soil and Debris
Treatability Variance for Remedial Actions," outlines the process
to be followed for establishing alternative treatment levels for
RCRA hazardous waste. In this particular case, if a treat-
ability variance is granted for the California list HOCs and not
U061, the treated waste can be placed in a landfill or a surface
.impoundment only if it meets the minimum technological
requirements. This is due .to the fact that California list
prohibitions are a minimum requirement, and U061 is a First Thirc
"soft hammer" waste that will remain a restricted waste after May
8, 1990 (assuming that a national capacity variance is granted to
soils containing a waste with a BDAT treatment standard based on
incineration). See 53 FR 31188.
If a treatability variance is granted for U061, once the
alternative treatment level is satisfied, disposal may occur in
any Subtitle C unit. This results from the fact that the
alternative treatment standard established for U061 will
supersede the treatment standard for the California list HOCs.
For more detailed'information on obtaining a treatability
variance, you can contact Marc Turgeon of my staff at 382-7917.
On-site Pnits
Your final question was whether waste that has been treated
in compliance with the applicable Part 268 standard can be
redeposited on-site in the unit from which it was removed. The
answer, while not entirely clear, is in most cases "yes." In the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
final rule (signed February 2, 1990), page 267 states: "EPA
believes that it is appropriate generally to consider CERCLA
areas of contamination as a single RCRA land-based unit or
2
-------
'landfill'." Furthermore, in most cases these areas of .
contamination (AOCs) are not subject to the design and operating
requirements for Subtitle C landfills (40 CFR 264.301) because
they are existing portions of the landfill. Any lateral
expansion of the existing unit, however, would trigger the
minimum technological requirements of 40 CFR 264.301(c).
Given these facts, the design requirements are not
*ppiirahie when soil that has been treated in compliance with the
applicable part 268 treatment standard is redeposited on-site in
the existing AOC. However, as noted in Superfund Directive
9234.2-04FS, "RCRA. ARARS: Focus on Closure Requirements":
RCRA requirements that are not applicable may, nonetheless,
be relevant and appropriate, based on site-specific
circumstances. . . . For example, minimum technology [sic]
requirements may be considered relevant and appropriate for
one area receiving waste because of the high potential for
migration of contaminants in hazardous levels to ground
water, but not for another area that contains relatively
immobile waste.
A related question pertinent to on-site disposal is whether
redeposition of the waste into the AOC would cause the AOC to be
considered a replacement unit and thereby trigger the MTRs. In
short, the MTRs would not apply because the AOC is not receiving
"new" waste, and thus, is not being reused. (See attached
memorandum from Marcia Williams, Director, Office of Solid Waste,
to James Scarbrough, April 12, 1986, response #3.)
Finally, although the design and operating requirements
contained in Subpart N may not be applicable, there may be other
requirements that win be applicable. For example, RCRA closure
requirements must be met.
I hope this memorandum clarifies these issues. Some of the
issues that you raised regarding capacity extensions are not
fully resolved as the Third Third final rule is still under
development. If you have any further comments or questions
please contact Debbie Wood at FTS 382-4770.
ATTACHMENT
cc: Conrad Simon, Region II
Bob Carr, Region II
Henry Guzman, Region II
Jeffrey Gratz, Region II
3
-------

UNITES STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.VASni'.CTON 0 C i0-30
C^C-)0
-r* 12 m,
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Closure of a DOE Surface Impoundment Unit
that has. Lost Interim Status
FROM: Marcia Williams/ Director
Office of Solid Waste
TO:	James H. Scarbrough, Chief
Residuals Management Branch# Region IV
Thank you for your memorandum of December 30, 1985, in which
you requested clarification of several issues relating to the
closure of a DOE surface impoundment unit in South Carolina that
has lost interim status. This memo addresses your questions in-^
the same order in which you stated them. Your first issue is
further divided into two related issues.
1. Can hazardous waste be removed from a surface
impoundment unit, and then be placed back in
that unit at closure if it has lost interim
status?
Yes—if the wastes are removed during
closure for the purpose of treating them to
enhance the effectiveness of .the closure. The
closure period occurs after the active life of
the unit and calls for activities not normally
carried out during operation of the unit (e.g.,
application of the final cover). Removal of
waste, treatment, and replacement for the
purposes of enhancing the closure process
may be essential to assuring long-term integrity
aft. the closure (e.g., stabilization may be
required to prevent differential settlement of
thm final cover). Other activities which may be
necessary to effect proper closure of the unit
may also be allowed. (We note that a contrary
policy would merely act as a disincentive to
taking appropriate steps to enhance closure.)
-------
-2-
The position outlined a'icve is consistent
with closure regulation Language at §265.1.13(a):
"within 90 days after receiving the Sinai volume of
hazardous waste. .. the owner or operator must treat,
remove from the site, or dispose of on-site all
hazardous wastes..." (emphasis added). EPA took a
similar position regarding the closure of surface
impoundments after January 25, 1993 when it stated
that removal and replacement of waste in the same unit
after January 25, 193*!3 Joes not constitute "receipt"
of waste for the purposes of determining whether a un-it
is a regulated unit. (See attached letter from
Or. John Skinner to Dr. Reva Rubenstein, Director,
Institute of Chemical Waste Management, January 11,
1983, response *4.)
However, if the surface impoundment wastes
are treated with vastes from other units, the
combined treated wastes may not .be placed back
into the surface impoundment. Moreover, treat-
ment outsLie the unit inay, in some cases, require
a permit. For example, treatment may involve
constructing a unit with a capital investment of
greater than fifty percent of the capital cost of
an entirely new facility (see §270.72).
2. Would removal, treatment, and replacement of the
wast a in a surface impoundment unit as a part of
closure constitute "reuse" of the unit and, thus,
require the retrofitting of that unit with a
double liner?
As you knot, replacement units at interim
status facilities (as well as other specified
units) are subjected to the HSWA Minimum
Technology Requirements undar Section 3015(b).
Baaed on the legislative history of Section 3015,
£?&'• Guidance on Implementation of the Minimum
Togjjbiological *equir«ient3 of HSWA of 1984,
Rcibacting Liners and Leachate Collection Systems
(S84/530-SW-85-012), defines "replacement" as
occurring when: (a) the unit is taken out of
service (i.e., the unit has stopped receiving
waste or the "normal" rate of waste receipt is
significantly decreased); (*a) all or sifcstantially
all of the «aste is removed; and (c) the unit is
reused.
-------
EPA believes that the references in the
legislative history to a unit that is taken
out of service and "reused" indicate that
Congress intended the replacement requirements
to apply when the unit was in the process of
actively managing hazardous waste/ i.e., during
the active life. (See S,. Rep. No. 284, 98th
Congress, 2nd Session 24 (1983).) Since the
impoundment in question is removing, treating#
and replacing the waste as part of closure and
is not managing any new waste, it is not
continuing to operate and "reuse" does not
occur. Hence/ the double liner retrofitting
requirement does not apply when waste is
removed from an existing unit/ treated and
replaced in the same unit as part of an
approved closure plan.
. As part of closure/ can hazardous, waste be removed
from the Lost Lake area and placed in the settling
basin? Assuming this can be considered to be one
waste management area, is it acceptable to remove
waste from one part of the waste management area and
place it in another?
In reviewing the drawings contained in the
"Closure Plan for the M-Area Settling Basin and
Vicinity at the Savannah River Plant" (July 1985),
it is apparent that the waste in the settling
basis is the same as that found in the Lost Lake
area. In fact/ these two areas are hydraulically
connected by an open ditch such that these areas
could be construed to be a single waste manage-
ment unit for the purposes of closure. As such/
waste movement during closure from one part of a
single unit to another part of that unit is
permissible*•and may be desirable from an
envixooaental standpoint. In this case it would
appaiir that removal of waste from the Lost Lake
are
-------
-4-
will require retrofitting with a daubLe liner.
Mounding of waste or 3oiL« within the existing di'
-------
JAN | | ISS3
Or. Reva Rubenatein
Director
Institute of Chemical wait!
Management
National Solid waetea
Managament Aaaoelatlon
1120 Connecticut Avenue* H.w,
Haahlngton, D.C. 20036
Dear Or. Rubanataiht
Thia lattar la in raaponaa to your latter of. Oacambar 6,
1992r raqueating intarpratation of eloaura and poet-cloeure
requlraaante regarding land dlapoaal faeilitiee. Z hava
raapondad to your queetiona in the ordar praaantad in your
lattar and attachaent.
1.	Reeontouring tha final cover material and/or adjueting
lnplaca waata in tha aame unit aa required to aaintain tha
function of tha final cover aa a raault of aubaldence and
aattlaaant# doaa not eonatltuta receipt of hasardoua vasta
aftar January 2S, 1983. Thaaa actlone auat ba deacribad
in aach facility*a eloaura and poet-cloaure plana vhleh
auat ba' approved by tha Regional Admlnlatrator. Hodifiea~
tiona can ba aada to thaaa plana aa nacaaaary with Aganey
approval.
2.	Tha controllad irrigation of tha vegetative eover la allowed
In ordac to eatabllah vegetation during tha eloaura pariod
or to aaintain it during prolongad dry apalla in tha poet-
eloaura BMlod. . But tha ragulationa require tha final covar
to provififcloog-term minimisation of algratlon of liquid a
through^Hfcloaad landfill (J2«4.310(a)(1)), and to function
with mlnnaa aaintananca (J2«4.310(a)(2)). Thua, tha
guldanca docuaanta recommend that tha plant apeciee choaan
ba indigenous, require ainlaal or no additional moisture,
and ba aalaetad baaed en antleipatad moisture, light#
temperature, a lava t loo, and eoapetltlve cohabitants,. etc.
-------
7ti« cloaura and poat«cloavra plan* should contain • daacrip-
el on of why and whan tha irrigatioa nay *»a datamlnad to
&« nacaaaary (e.g., reoonaandad by local agronoaiat to
aeta&llafc ~•natation during a dry parlod), tha aaount and
frtqMBqr of wa tar application, and watar balanca analysis
shoving the effect of the irrigation watar on total annual
liquid input through tha final cowar.
CVA has available two raporta that prowide technical
informatics on thla subjact, entitled •Evaluating Cower
Syataaa for Solid and l«i«rtoa« tfacta* «W<7, Jeptaabar
1592« which discuaeca irrigation of plant cowr and othar
plast requireaentai and (2) •Hydrologie Siaulatlon on
Solid vaata Oiapoaal Sitae" Sv-atS, Scpteaber lfS3, wiiicl*
'it a computerised vatar balance aodel# to eweluate tha
probable hydrologie parforaaica of agisting or propoeed
landfill dcaigitc* Both of tha reporte ara available frca
tha Cowernmat Printing Offlea (IW-9S7 la Stooft Wo, S33-
0Od-CO22«-3 «S4,7S» S«-«4( it ItMt So. 055-4Q0-4022S-S
#14.00). KPA is currently revising tha nodal for "Uydsologla
• • illation on Solid Vasts Oiapoaal Sitae* to aaabla its
uaa la eetinatlag seepage through tha llaar as wall aa
throagh tha cower* Tha rawiaad nodal ahould ba available
aarly. la 1M3,
Your etateaent that 49 CTW Parts 2S4 and 2SS prohibit tha
addition of ball liquids to tha vaate nanageaeat ualt la
ao« quite accurate. Bulk liquid* ara alidad if tha site
la llnad and haa a leaefcata collection and rnotal aysten.
Liquids la tha laaehata collection eyctea auet ba reaored
during operation, clooura, and poat*«loaura. 2a general#
tha addition of liquids into tha anit during cloaura would
ba parslttad only if by doing ao tha facility and waata
will ba atabiliaed sconar« Aa you kao«f tha objective
daring and after closure is to reaove licaida and fcaa-p thaa
cat* If liquida ara addad during cloaura, tha eloeure parled
woald naad to ba extended uatll tha additloo atoppad,
•* . •
To fsrtbar clarify tha ibcti arplaaatloaa S mat eaphaelae.
four points* First# say liquid appllad to tha final cover
of a landfill to sustain vegetation eaiaaoc ba a fcasardoue
waata (Sfi6« tniot ba leachate tmlaaa it is ao longer a
laurdnflyuta)» aaaaot Mn tha vegetation# aad cannot
otiMnidupiif tha lntegri ty of tha final cover (e.g..
esuse lsgrosaert iafiltratlon because of daaaga eauaed by
p*)» Second*# liqalda nay not ba lajactad into tha waata
aftor eloeure (e.g.# lcechate recirculation by infaction)#
sinco thla la contrary to tha poat—cloaura objactiv* of
keeping liqalda out* Third, aa statad abo»a» liquids
coald bo allowed during eloaara# including laachata
-------
recirculation, lf» (a) there 1a, a liner and leachate
collection aystan, (b) leachate\ls ramoved from the
leachate collection system, (c) the addition of liquids
aervae to enhance cloaura (e.g., acealarataa aubeidence
lad stabilisation), rather tJun merely aerves aa a convaniant
way to dlaposo of tha liquids, and (d) the liquid addition
Is explained and Justified la tha cloaura plan* Such
eloeuro would no* be completed' until recirculation eeaaee.
Alao, recirculation of. a hasardoua waata (leachate) after
January 26, 1983 would sake tho unit a regulated unit,
aubjeot to-tho requirement a of Part 2(4* Z ahould point
out that raclreulation of a hazardoua waato (leachate) can
oceur during operation and would normally bo ebnaldarad an
operational rathor than closure*activity. Cloaura activities
aro thoae which-lead to stabilisation of tho unit in a
tiaely aanner aftar receipt of wastas haa eeaaed. Fourth,
tho characteristics and purpose of any liquids • to bo added
to tho landfill or to tho cover during or aftar eloaure
mat bo apecified In tho cloaura or post-closure plana and
approved by tho XA (or authorisad State)# including any
extension of tho eloaura period •• Such purpoae and extenelon
mist bo conslstsnt with tho environmental objectives specified
la Fart 264 or 265.
Landfills that are currently engaged in eo-dlspesal- of §
hasardoua and non-hasardoua waataa could coetlnue to accep£.
non-hasardoua waatss aftar January 23, IMSr^tvorder to *¦
complete a partially filled, hasardoua waate unit and close
under either 40 C?1 Fart. 265 or-Fart 264 requirements. Thla
asiuMi that tho owner or- oporator coop la tea tho call la a
tiaaly aanner, which generally means within tho 180 day
cloaura period# Zf tho closure cannot bo completed within
tho 180 days tho owner or operator muat apply to have the
cloaura period extended beyond 6 aoatha* for a specified
tlae period, aa provided 1a 40 CP* 263.113(b) or 264.113(b),
to allow tho waata to bo filled until tho dealgned elevation
la reached. Thla type of cloaura could bo approved If It
provldee' for a more environmentally sound eloaura*. and not
melrely for tho economic convenience of tho owner or operator,
tach extenelon -will be considered om a caae-by-caao baals.
Tho regulatory concern, lo closing tho landfill In aa expedient
a tlaoTjtt la practical 
-------
oc cloaure permit (e.g., tiae period; final contours, type
of waata)•
For the situation where a surface lapoundaant "closes as a
landfill.* before January 25, 1983, I presume you aean no
mora ha*»rdoua waatae received after January 25, 1933, but
cloaure fe.g.,dewataring, ate.) has not yat baan dona.
The vasts will be raaoved froa the surface impoundment,
solidified and replaced in tha aaae iapoundaent, to anaura
that it vill !>+«* tlva weight of tha cover. KPA doaa not
conaider thin replacement of waate aftar January 25, 1983,
to ba "receipt* of hasardoua vaata which would eonatituta
a 'regulated unit*. This daciaioa aaauaaa that tha
aolidifying aaterlal la not a hasardoua waate.
Por your:laat quaetion you deecrl&ed tha eaaa whara
aultiple:hasardoua waata tranehaa will eaaaa to receive
hasardoua waata on or bafora January 25, 1983, and whara
tha eloaura plan providee for a dalayad cloaura of a half*
fillad tranch for tha depoelt of aolidifiad hasardoua
waata froa cloaad and eappad tranehaa* Zn general# aucfc
•pla ceaent of aolidifiad hasardoua waata fro* tha cloaa4
tranehaa into tha reaerved half-fIliad trench* even at'
tha aaae facility* will ba conaidarad "raeaipt* of haaardouS^
waata such aa to eonatituta a "regulated* unit beeaua* tha
waata la received and diapoaad at tha facility unit aftar
January 2<» 1993* Z rafar you to tha July 24# 1982 retferal
Rao1star preamble discussion at 47 fit 32289 which describee
tha concept of a waata aanageaent unit* Whara landfills
conaiat of a sariaa of tranehaa which ara aaparataly lined,
aach tranch la a aaparata waata aanagaaant unit. Tha tranafar
of hasardoua waata froa ona unit to anothar aftar January 28,
199) therefore aakee tha receiving tranch or unit a "regulated*
unit*
Aa a aide note# Z should aantion that the cleiura
performance standard for interia etatua and for permitting
facilitiae la the.aaaa (40 C7* 244,111 and 40 £Tk 245.111).
The final cater or cap for landfilla cloaad uiider Part 244 or
245 standards should be aiailar. Significant diffarancea in
the design oflLtte cap ahould raault froa site specific factors
rather thauflBto type of penit a facility bae« Thua, many of
the ahove»ts apply to both Part 244 and 245 clceurj^
Z hope tlUTabove explanation* help clarify the ragulationa
for you* Should you have any further queatione with regard to
-------
till* r«Qul«tlon sffacts NSWA asabsrs plsass contact as or
rsd Lindsay of ay staff (382-4756).
Siacsrsly yours,
John H. Skinnac
Acting Diractor
Offica of Solid watts
ccs Ration* 2 — X (With incoming)
Hika Cook
Eilaan Clausaan
John Lahaan
Brucs waddla
Lisa Priadaan
Mark Grssnwood
Prad Lindsay
Cans Lucsro
Kan Shustsr
-------
«M «•« »Vt «W>H
REGION II
DATE:
PuH^fcCT;
Land Ban Concerns at a C2RCLA Pesticide (DOT) Spill Sit*
from:
Jeffrey Gratz, Projact Manager
Federal Facilities Section
TO:
Ton Ovandan
Land Disposal Restriction Branch (OS«333)
Plattsburgh Air Force. Base (PAF8), located in Clinton County, New
York, recently decided to perform a removal action at a. DDT spill
area. Because of an earlier ban on DDT application, PAFB
stockpiled its remaining high-grade DDT in a Defense
Reutilization and Kainenance Office (DRMO) storage yard beginning
in 1970. By 1972 all the drums had either spilled or had
corroded to the point where all DDT' had leaked onto the ground,
adjacent to the storage pad. The facility is on the National
Priorities List (NPL).
Recently, the Base completed its study of the area and determined
that most of the contamination resides in a drainage swale and
. that over time the contamination has spread to an area of
approximately 600'x 20' (see figure). DDT concentration in the
soil is as high as 1.5%. For the removal action, PAFB has
proposed to dig up the soil and treat it using a solvent
extraction process (a bench scale study utilizing this process
was recently completed). Based on a health and ecological
assessment (currently being review by Region II), PAFB has
proposed a clean up level of 10 ppm for DDT. After this level is
achieved in the treatment unit, PAFB proposes to redeposit the
soil in the drainage swale.
• There are several land ban concerns which Z have discussed with
you and would appreciate clarification. They are as follows:
1) Applicability of Capaoity Variance: The proposed land ban
restrictions for third-third scheduled wastes are somewhat
unclear:
a.	pg. III. B-28 states that "sufficient capacity exists
for treatment of halogenated organic wastes; therefore,
2PA is not proposing to grant a national capacity
variance for these wastes." ("these wastes" include
DDT (U061) for which the BOAT is a treatment level
based on incineration.)
b.	pg. III. B-94 states that "EPA is proposing today to
grant an extension of the effective date of certain
1st, 2nd, and 3rd 3rd contaminated soil and debris for
which the treatment standards proposed are based on
combustion ..."
In our discussions, it was determined that a capacity
RBUON II FORM 1S20-1 (*/M)
-------
variance ia applicable to this site and would bo effective
until May 8, 1992. Please confirm this interpretation.
2)	equivalent Treataent Method Petition or a Treatability
variance: since the referenced soil contains DDT (an
halogenated organic compound [HOC]) above 1000 mg/kg in some
areas, California List restrictions will also be applicable.
As of November 8, 1990, a RCRA/CSRCLA soil and debris
containing HOCs over 1000 mg/kg must be incinerated at
99.99% DRE. Please confirm this interpretation.
After November 8, 1990., would the facility need an
Equivalent Treatment Method Petition to show that the
solvent extraction method is equivalent to the treatment
standard for this California waste?
Or, would the facility have to apply for a Treatability
variance for RCRA/CERCLA soil and debris to show that the
DDT (in the halogenated non-polar aromatic structural
functional group) will undergo the recommended percent
reduction (90-99.9% - from Superfund LDR Guide #6A) using
the solvent extraction method? Is a Treatability Variance
applicable when the treatment standard of incineration
99.99% DR2 is specific to RCRA/CSRCLA soil and debris
(Highlight 1, Superfund LDR Guide #2)?
Based on discussions with you, the Treatability Variance is
applicable. Please confirm this interpretation.
3)	Must the treated soil go to a receiving unit that meets RCRA
minimum technology requirements or ean it be redeposited
o&aite (to the same area from which it was taken)?: Because
the hazardous waste (the DDT contaminated soil) is being
removed from the ground and treated in a treatment unit,
placement will occur and LDR is applicable. There are two
periods of concern:
a* Between May 8, 1990 and November 8, 1990, a national
capacity variance will be in place for the described
waste (this is assuming that these proposed regulations
go final and that the above interpretations are
correct).
b. After November 8, 1990, the waste will be subject to
California List restrictions and a Treatability
Variance (or Sguivalent Treatment Method Petition?)
would be required.
During either of these time periods, can the treated soil be
redeposited onsite? If the treated soil can be redeposited
onsite, does the "unit11 (in this case, the excavated area)
need to meet minimum technology requirements? Baaed on
discussions with you, the treated soil ean be redeposited
onsite and the "unit* does not have to meet minimum
-------
technology requirements. Pleas® explain the basis of your
interpretation (CERCLA, the Federal Regulations, EPA policy,
or guidance).
Because the facility is currently writing a Environmental
Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA), and has allocated funds to be
used on this project during this fiscal year, a quick response to
these issues is needed. Zf you have any questions please call me
at FTS 264-6667.
attachment
cc: R.	Wing PSB-FFS
V.	Pitruzzello PSB
N.	Morgan HQ
C.	Stein HWF
-------

-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound	CAS Number
Halogenated Organics
1. Halogenated Non-Polar Aromatic Compounds
Chlorobenzene	108-90*7
Chlorobenzilate	570-15-6
2-Chloronapthalene	91-58-7
1.2-Dichlorobenzene	95-50-1
1.3-Dichlorobenzene	541-73-1
1.4-Dlchlorobenzene	106-46-7
Hexachlorobenzene	118-74-1
Hexachlorophene	70-3-04
Pentachlorobenzene	608-93-5
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene	95-94-3
1.2.4-Trlchlorobenzene	120-82-1
Benzal Chloride	98-87-3
ODD	72-54-8
DDE	72-55-9
DDT	50-29-3
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene	77-47-4
2a. Dloxlns/Furans and their Precursors
Hexachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlns
Hexachlorodlbenzofurans
Pentachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlns
Pentachlorodlbenzo furans
Tecrachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxlns
Te tr achlorodlbenzo furans
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-dloxin	1746
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid	94
2.4.5-TP	(Sllvex)	93
01-6
75-7
72-1
2,4,5-T	93-76-5
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BDAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound	CAS Number
2b. PCBs
Aroclor 1016	12674-11-2
Aroclor 1221	11104-28-2
Aroclor 1232	11141-16-5
Aroclor 1242	53469-21-9
Aroclor 1248	12672-29-6
Aroclor 1254	11097-69-1
Aroclor 1260	11096-82-5
2c. Herbicides
2,4,5-T	93-76-5
2,4-D	94-75-7
3.	Halogenated Phenols. Cresola. Other Polar Aromatlcs
4-Chloroanillne	106-47-8
2-Chlorophenol	95-57-8
3,3'-Dlchlorobenzldlne	91-94-1
2,4-Dichlorophenol	120-83-2
2,6-Dlchlorophenol	87-65-0
4,4'-Methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)	101-14-4
Pentachlorophenol	87-86-5
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol	58-90-2
2.4.5-Trichlorophenol	95-95-4
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol	88-06-2
p-Chloro-m-cresol (4-Chloro-3-
nethylphenol)	59-50-7
Methoxychlor	72-43-5
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether	101-55-3
Pentachloronltrobenzene	82-68-8
4.	Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds
Bromodichloromethane	75-27-4
Brooomethane	74-83-9
Carbon tetrachloride	56-23-5
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene	126-99-8
Chlorodibromonethane	124-48-1
Chloroethane	75-00-3
Chloroform	67-66-3
Chloromethane	74-87-3
3-Chloropropene	107-05-1
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound
CAS Number
Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds (continued)
1,2 •Dibromo-3-chloropropane	96-12•8
1,2-Dlbromoethane	106-93-4
Dibronomethane	74-95-3
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butane	110-57-6
Dichlorodlfluoromethane	75-71-8
1.1-Dlchloroethane	75-34-3
1.2-Dichloroethane	107-06-2
1.1-Dlchloroethene	75-35-4
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene	156-60-5
1.2-Dichloropropane	78-87-5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene	10061-02•6
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene	10061-01•5
Methylene chloride	75-09-2
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane	630-20-6
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane	79-34-5
Tetrachloroethene	127-18-4
Trlbromomethane	75-25-2
1.1.1-Trichloroethane	71-55-6
1.1.2-Trichloroethane	79-00-5
Trlchloroethene	79-01-6
1.1.2-Trlchloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane	76-13-1
Trichloromonofluoromethane	75-69-4
1.2.3-Trichloropropane	96-18-4
Vinyl chloride	75-01-4
Hexachlorobutadiene	87-68-3
Hexachloroethane	62-72-1
Hexachloropropene	1888-71-7
Pentachloroethane	76-01-7
Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate	126-72-7
Iodomethane	74-88-4
Halogenated Cyclic Allohatlcs/Ethers/Esters/Ketones
Aranite
Aldrin
alcha-BHC
beta-BHC
140-57-8
309-00-2
319-84-6
319-85-7
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS FITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound
CAS Number
S. Halogenated Cyclic Aliphatics/Ethers/Esters/Ketonea (continued)
delta-BHC	319-
gamma-BHC	58-
Chlordane	57 •
Dieldrin	60-
Endosulfan I	939-
Endosulfan II	33213-
Endrin	72-
Endrin aldehyde	7421-
Heptachlor	76-
Heptachlor epoxide	1024-
Isodrin	465-
Kepone	143-
Toxaphene	8001-
2-Chloroethyl	vinyl ether	110-
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane	111-
Bls(2-chloroethyl)ether	111-
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether	39638-
3-Chloropropionitrile	542-
II. Non-Halogenated Organics
86-8
89-9
74-9
57-1
98-8
06-5
20-8
93-4
44-8
57-3
73-6
50-0
35-2
75-8
91-1
44-4
32-9
76-7
Nitrated Aromatic and Aliphatic Compounds
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol	88-85-7
1,4-Dinitrobenzene	100-25-4
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol	(2-Methyl-4,6-
dinitrophenol)	534-52-1
2,4-Dinitrophenol	51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene	121-14-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene	606-20-2
5-Nitro-o-toluidine	95-65-8
Methyl parathion	298-00-0
Parathion	56-38-2
4-Nitroaniline	100-06-6
Nitrobenzene	98-95-3
4-Nitzophenol	100-02-7
2-Nitropropane	79-46-9
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BDAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound	CAS Number
7.	Simple Non-Polar Aromatics and Heterocyclics
Toluene	108-88-3
1.2-Xylene	97-47-6
1.3-Xylene	108-38-3
1.4-Xylene	106-44-5
Isoafrole	120-58-1
Safrole	94-59-7
Pyridine	110-86-1
2-Picoline	109-06-8
Benzene	71-43-2
EChylbenzene	100-41-4
8.	Polvnuclear Aromatics
Acenaphthylene	208-96-8
Acenaphthene	83-32-9
Anthracene	120-12-7
Benz(a)anthracene	56-55-3
Benzo(b) fluoranthene	205-99-2
Benzo(k)fluoranthene	207-08-9
Benzo(ghi)perylene	191-24-2
Benzo(a)pyrene	50-32-8
Chrysene	218-01-9
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene	53-70-3
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene	192-65-4
Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene	106-46-7
Fluoranthene	206-44-0
rluorene	86-73-7
Indenol(l,2,3-cd)pyrene	120-58-1
Methapyrilene	91-80-5
3-Methylcholanthrene	56-49-5
Naphthalene	91-20-13
Phenanthrene	85-01-8
Pyrene	129-00-0
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound	CAS Number
Other Polar Organic Comoounds

2-Acetylaminofluorene
53-96-3
4 - Aoinob lphenyl
92-67-1
Aniline
62-53-3
3,3'-Diaethoxybenzidine
119-90-4
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
60-11-7
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
119-93-7
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
621-64-7
Diphenylamine
112-39-4
Diphenylnitrosaaine
86-30-6
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
122-66-7
1-Naphthylaaine
134-32-7
2-Naphthylaaine
91-59-8
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
924-116-3
N-Nitrosodie thylaaine
55-18-5
N-Nitrosodiaethylaaine
62-75-9
N-Nitrosomethylethylaaine
10595-95-6
N-Nitrosomorpholine
58-89-2
N-Nitrosopiperidine
100-75-4
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
930-55-2
Phenacetin
62-44-2
o-Cresol (2-Methylphenol)
95-48-7
p-Cresol (4-Methylphenol)
106-44-5
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
Phenol
108-95-2
Resorcinol
108-46-3
Acrolein
107-02-8
Carbon disulfide
75-15-0
Ethyl aethacrylate
97-63-2
Isobutyl alcohol
78-83-1
Ethylene oxide
75-21-8
Benzenethiol
108-98-5
2?Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone)
78-93-3
4- Me thy1-2-pentanone (methyl isobutyl

ketone)
108-10-1
Methyl methacrylate
80-62-6
Methyl methanesulfonate
66-27-3
Acetophenone
96-86-2
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound
CAS Number
9. Other Polar Organic Compounds (continued)
p-Benzoquinone	106-51-4
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate	117-81-7
Butylbenzyl phthalate	85-68-7
Diethyl phthalate	84-66-2
Dimethyl phthalate	131-11-3
Di-n-butyl phthalate	84-74-2
Di-n-octyl phthalate	117-84-0
1,4-Naphthoquinone	130-15-4
Acetonitrile	75-05-8
Ethyl cyanide	107-12-0
Methacrylonitrile	126-98-7
Disulfoton	298-04-4
Famphur	52-85-7
Phorate	298-02-2
Phthalic anhydride	85-44-9
1,4-Dioxane	123-91-1
Acetone	67-64-1
n-Butanol	71-36-3
Cyclohexanone	108-94-1
2-Ethoxyethanol	110-80-5
Ethyl acetate	141-78-6
Ethyl ether	60-29-7
Methanol	67-56-1
Pronamide	23950-58-5
III. Inorganics
10. Non-Volatile Metals
Barium
Beryllium
Chromium (total and hexavalent)
Copper	~.^
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Vanadium
.'J
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
•7440-47-3
7440-50-8
7439-92-1
* 7440-22-0
>'7440-22-4
7445-62-2
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
BOAT LIST COMPOUNDS WITHIN EACH STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL GROUP
Group/Compound	CAS Number
11.	Volatile Metals
Antimony	7440-36-0
Arsenic	7440-38-2
Cadmium	7440-43-9
Mercury	7439-97-6
Selenium	7782-49-2
Thallium	7440-28-0
12.	Other Inorganics
Cyanide	57-12-5
Fluoride	16964-48-8
Sulfide	8496-25-8
*** DRAFT - August 15, 1989 ***
-------
X
-------
EVALUATION FORM
OVERVIEW OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TRAINING COURSE
REGION: 		DATE: 	
1.	How would you rate the quality of the presentation? (circle one)
Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
2.	Were appropriate topics covered? (circle one)
Yes	No	Partially
Suggestions for additions or deletions: 	
• •
3.	How would you rate the quality of the visual aids? (circle one)
Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
4.	Did the review exercise (check one):
Help clarify the presentation? 	
Have little effect on understanding the presentation? 	
Add confusion to the presentation? 	
5.	How difficult was the review exercise? (circle one)
Too hard	Just about right	Too easy .
6.	What did you like best about the course? 	
7.	What did you like least about the course? 		
8.	Other comments or suggestions:
Please use the space below to write any other comments you have on any
aspect of the course: content, format, logistics, etc.
-------
REVIEW OF LDR FRAMEWORK
TRUE OR:FALSE
•Placement into a unit includes:
T oir
F
a.
f or
F
b.
;T or
F
c.
:T or
F
d.
Removal of wastes from a land disposal unit,
treatment, and redeposition of the wastes in the unit
Capping waste in place
Treatment in situ
Consolidation of wastes from other units or
contaminated areas into a land disposal unit
2.	Restricted wastes:
T or F	a. are those hazardous wastes for which an effective date
has passed, but a treatment standard is not in effect
_T "or F	b. are always subject to the prohibitions on storage and
dilution
• |T. or F	c. will all be prohibited by May 8, 1992
3.	',A treater incinerates a high TOC ignitable waste and sends the ash to a
^Subtitle D landfill and must send notification and certification to both
i.EPA and the landfill. T or F
4.	-Storage of a D008 nonwastewater lead acid battery stored on May 8, 1990
is permitted. T or F
5.	: Treatment facilities may not use generator or treater-provided
information. T or F
• . ... .¦
6.	.Waste analys^^l-aris are requiredforwastes treated to the treatment
'standards: ila9vrdLay tanks. T or F;
-------
MULTIPLE CHOICE
7. Treatment standards do not apply to the following:
a.	Wastes disposed of prior to the LDRs
b.	Small quantity generators exempt from RCRA
c.	Waste identified as hazardous solely due to a new characteristic
d.	All of the above
8. A national capacity variance:
a.	applies to wastes that differ significantly from those used to
determine BDAT treatment standards
b.	may be granted for a period of 2 years, with no renewal option
c.	exempts the specific waste from all LDR requirements
9. A facility is treating K042 wastewaters by solvent extraction and
achieves a pentachlorobenzene concentration of 0.04 mg/1. The BDAT for
this waste is incineration. The treatment standard for
pentachlorobenzene in K042 is set at 0.055 mg/1. The facility is
a.	already in compliance with the LDRs and no further treatment is
required.
b.	not in compliance with the LDRs and must incinerate its waste.
c.	not in compliance with the LDRs and additional solvent extraction
treatment is required.
10. Which, if any of the following generators is fully exempted from the
notification requirements?
a.	Generator A generates a D007 nonwastewater and treats it on-site
to meet the treatment standard and sends the residual to a
Subtitle D landfill.
b.	Generator B is a small quantity generator and has a signed tolling
agreement with a recylcler.
c.	Generator C generator is a 90-day generator and sends a partially
treated EP toxic nonwastewater to a commercial Subtitle C facility
for final treatment and disposal.
d.	None of the above.
-------
11.
Small Quantity Generators (SQG) with tolling agreements are:
a.	exempt from the dilution prohibition
b.	subject to one-time notification and certification requirements
c.	required to maintain notifications and certifications for five
years
d.	exempted from the land disposal restrictions
12. A treater receives a D007 nonwastewater that it treats to meet the
treatment standard and sends to a Subtitle D landfill. The treater also
generates a wastewater that does not exhibit a characteristic. Which of
the following statements are true?
a.	notification and certification is required for both wastes
generated
b.	notification and certification are sent to the Subtitle D
landfill
c.	notification and certification is required only for the residual
sent to the Subtitle D facility; notification and certification
are sent to the EPA Region or authorized State.
d.	b and c
-------
GUIDANCE ON COMPLYING WITH A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
FOR SOIL AND DEBRIS
EPA has developed guidance on obtaining treatability variances for
remedial actions in Superfund LDR Guide //6A (Attached). This guidance
outlines the major steps in the-treatability variance process:
(1)	Identify restricted constituents in contaminated soil.
(2)	Determine if the LDR effective date for the waste has passed.
(3)	Organize constituents into the appropriate structural-functional group
(1st column of Table 1).
(4)	•" Compare the concentration level of each restricted constituent to the
"threshold influent concentration" (TIC) (column 3 of Table 1).
If the constituent concentration is less than the TIC, the treated
waste concentration must fall within the specified concentration
range (2nd column of Table 1).
If the constituent concentration is greater than the TIC, the
treated waste concentration must fall within the specified percent
reduction range (4th column of Table 1).
(5)	Identify the appropriate treatment technologies to use to meet the
treatment ranges (column 5 of Table 1).
(6)	Analyze the treated waste to verify that interim guidance levels have
been achieved.
CASE STUDY
A site has soils and sludges contaminated with the high zinc subcategory
of K061 wastes (emission control dust/sludge from the preliminary production
of steel in electric furnaces). Jane Manager has analyzed the waste and
determined that the following constituents are present at these
concentrations:
Cadmium	65 ppm -	100 ppm
Chromium	45 ppm •	75 ppm
Lead	150 ppm •	225 ppm
Nickel	50 ppm -	95 ppm
Jane knows that K061 was regulated in the-First Third rule, and that the.
treatment technology for this waste is stabilization. However, she is unclear
how the LDRs apply to soils and sludges contaminated with this waste, because
Jane does not believe that the treatment standards can'be met at this site.
Step by step, using the attached sheet, assist Jane 16 determining if the LDRs
apply to this site, and if so, how to comply with a treatability variance.
She has filled out some preliminary answers.
-------
JANE'S SHEjBT
1. The effective date for K06I is:
ROQh.wastes. hope to %qe,G rtfa LDJfa, ibqeause they lore already regulated in
the Fiest Third nj^St-.
2. Effective date for soils contaminated withK061:;
3 . Wastes,tpot^nfcjLfilJtyf'needing, a $£«atafeility v^rtftjice:
All soils and sludges cpatagjinated with K061.
4. Interim guidance levels for treatability variance:
5. Technologies that will achieve these levels:
-------
CA^&TUlft '1SNSWERS
Determine If the effective date for the contaminating waste has passed:
K061 is a-sKir^e Third waste and has treatment standards based on
^sFtsBillzatiori'.': Irt ^TiCtft ^Ttoird rule .S^apikrit^ '«e6etislb"ns were
granted only to soil and debris requirJS^iniSifljeTrafeijdn'.
Therefore, the effective date of the LDRs for this waste is August
8, 1988;.
K061 sludges can probably be treated to the LDR standards, and
must be separated from the soils for traatnent.
If the waste cannot achieve the treatment standards for K061
soils, a treatability variance may be Requested, and land disposal
of the waste may occur if the interim guidance levels are
achieved.
Determine the interim guidance levels:
By looking at Table 1, you can show Jane that the concentration
levels focaos&i&Uft and nickel (65 -100 ppm arid 50 - 95 ppm,
respectively) ire higher- th&h th^'Ti&^'Tco£c entr atI oiu;Jevels fori,
chromium and lead (45 - 75 ppm arid 150 • 225 ppm, respectively)
are lower than' th& TIC."	tlM£^irit£riin^guidaucfe:/leve 1 s
for these constituents are
—	Cadmium	95 - 99.9% reduction
—	Chromium	0.5 - 6.0 ppm
—	Lead	0.1 - 3.0 ppm
—	Nickel®^- ^-	95 - 99.9% reduction
The technologies that, will achieve these levels are:
Immobilization; and
Soil washing.
Analyze the waste to ensure that the interim guidance levels have been
reached through the-applicable technologies.,
-------
Table 1. ALTERNATE TREATABILITY VARIANCE LEVELS AMD
TECHNOLOGIES FOR S^UCTMRAUFUNCTIOMAL GROUPS
Structural
PundMnai ;
Croups
Concentration
Ranoa ' •
$Pn) ^
Threshold
Concentration
«fP"0
Per cant
Reduction^
- Range _
Technologies that achieved
recommended effluent
oonoentrstlon guManco^";.


S5n
i&f: 'V '*»'
*• t's
< / < '. ?£ >
MpWWpaili: y. Si"-
nSnQBnaBKI
Nan-Polar
Aromafca.
0.5-10;:
100
90-999
BlobQleal Treatmant, low-tamp. Stripping. J.
CadllBMkfaM ^ rnr
-¦ - -
tmmoouon, 901 WHrang
StiMum
0.006
0.06 .
90-99
immaftMiaWon
vamtfum
02-20
aoo
90-99
• liniiUJUton
Cadmium
02-2
¦ -40
96 - 99.9
- ftnmoMMton. Soi Waahing
LMd
0.1-3
300
99-99.9
NivnuuwuDn, soi wiviiq
Manxry
0.0008-0,008
0.06;
90-99
Ui>nuiaia*»i
* TCLP also may bt tatd wtmn nottattint warn 4» wUdk orynua an not a pmapmt umMUuml t*at Sam bmn trtattd	m
ufVRobiEtotioti prtcuM*
•• Otouduiota&mvUuMdittmBl&mto&a^ji&mttoind^&^cmadhinlkiitkwfaMemMkmor
ptrettu-ndueaom flange.
S02014-1
-------