PROCEEDINGS OF THE
QUALITY CONTROL
EPA/INDUSTRY
SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
-------
PROCEEDINGS OF THE EPA/INDUSTRY
QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
HELD AT:
Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
Symposium Chairman:
Frank E. Johnson
Emission Development Testing
Chrysler Corporation
Detroit, Michigan 48288
-------
SUMMARY REPORT
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
INTRODUCTION:
This report summarizes the proceedings, information,
discussions and presentations made at the Fourth Quality
Control Symposium held at the Environmental Protection
Agency. Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, on October 5,
1977 .
As in the previous meetings, this symposium was a joint
EPA/Automotive Industry effort to discuss the Quality Control
techniques used to assure that a test facility is producing
valid.emissions data. Approximately 53 persons attended
the symposium and are listed in Appendix 1.
The symposium was conducted in the manner of the pre-
vious meetings in that informal comments and presentations
were encouraged. Because of this spontaneity, it is diffi-
cult to record a synopsis that flows with continuity.
The viewgraphs used in the presentations and additional
information are contained in the appendices.
- 2 -
-------
SYNOPSIS OF SYMPOSIUM:
The discussion of the presentations will follow the
general outline of the symposium. Agenda Items I, II, and
III have been combined because of their similarities.
Bruce Gardner, of Ford, presented a summary of quality
control checks performed on the test cell equipment. The
majority of Ford CVS systems are the venturi type. A list
outlining the actual quality checks, the techniques, fre-
quencies, and limits, is shown in Appendix 2.
Chrysler
Frank Johnson, of Chrysler, presented the quality
control checks performed on the test cell equipment. The
Chrysler facilities are connected to an on-line computer
system which contains the analyzer calibration data and has
analyzer range sensing capability.
Chrysler - Carbon Dioxide-Water Interference
A check list (Appendix 3) used by the Highland Park test
cell operators each shift was discussed. The Chrysler carbon
monoxide analyzers are equipped with pressurized carbon
dioxide filter cells and optical filters. Therefore, the
response to moist carbon dioxide is checked each shift. The
mechanism for performing this test is built into the bag analy-
zer benches.
Analyzers are spanned at the beginning of each shift on
the most sensitive range and are then checked on the two higher
ranges; allowable deviations are + 2% of the full scale range-
to-rarige. Analyzer ranges that are switched during a test are
spanned and zeroed. Chrysler believes in a mid-span check when
calibrating so that each time an anlyzer is spanned, a mid-span
check is made. Unadjusted mid span readings must be + 1 re-
corder division. Typical analyzer ranges at the Chrysler Chel-
sea Proving Grounds are:
HYDROCARBON CO (ppm) %_jCC>2 NOx (ppm)
(ppm Propane)
Ford
0-250
0-2000
0-4.0% 0-250
0-100
0-500
0-2 . 5
0-100
0-25
0-100
0-1.0
0-25
3
-------
Chrysler - NOx Converter Efficiency
The NOx converter efficiency is checked weekly with
a minimum acceptable efficiency of 90%, preferably 95%
or better. If the efficiency is less than 95%, corrective
action is taken.
Chrysler - Cell-to-Cell Correlation
On a weekly basis, at the Proving Grounds, a calibra-
tion gas standard of approximately 20-50% of the most com-
monly used range of the analyzers is analyzed at all test
sites.. The analyzers are spanned with the daily working
gases. A deviation of + 1 recorder division from the master
curve is cause for immediate action; a deviation of + .5
divisions initiates an investigation.
At the Highland Park facility, a gas blending station
has been installed and connected to the central calibration
system (Appendix 3). The blended gas is available to the
cell operator at anytime for a check of the analyzers. The
system blends two cylinders in a ratio of approximately 20%
Cylinder A to 80% Cylinder B. A system has been incorporated
in the bag analyzer benches (Appendix 3) so that the blended
gas can be read directly or the blended gas can be put in the
CVS bags and read from the bags. This enables the operator to:
1. Check the bag analyzer curves.
2. Check the integrity of the CVS bags.
3. Check the bag analyzer sample system.
4. Check the adequacy of the bag evacuation and purge'
sy s t em.
5. Check NOx converter efficiency.
This system was in a trial status at the present time but
a sample of the data generated was discussed (Appendix).
Chrysler uses the Heath PDP Constant Volume Sampler with
the. primary calibration performed using a Meriam Laminar Flow
Element. A typical calibration was shown (Appendix).
The Constant Volume Samplers sample integrity is checked
daily using a Critical Flow Orifice and propane gas. Typical
data are shown (Appendix). If the percent error is greater
than + 2% the cell is shut down and the cause of the disagree-
ment is located. In some instances this requires a CVS recali-
bration. Propane is used instead of carbon monoxide because
of the danger of using 100% carbon monoxide.
- 4 -
-------
Chrysler uses Hydrogen-Helium for the FID fuel instead
of hydrogen-nitrogen. Chrysler has used this blend and
believes this gives the correct hydrocarbon value, recogniz-
ing that this fuel will result in a 3% higher reading than
the hydrogen-nitrogen fuel.
General comments on the Chrysler central calibration
system were made. The forty-one stainless steel lines were
freon flushed and if the system has been static for awhile,
the NOx lines are run until a steady calibration value is
ob tained.
EPA
Don Paulsell made the presentation for EPA. Don described
the Sample Analysis Correlation (SAC) Program in which a blend-
ed gas is placed in a bag and read on all the light duty analy-
zer sites. The gas is blended using the system shown in Ap-
pendix 5. Control limits and control chart flags were discussed
and are listed in the Appendix.
The capabilities of the SAC Program include the .assessment
of site-to-site, range-to-range correlation and repeatability
plus the diagnosis of instrument problems. A complete listing
of the program capabilities is contained in the Appendix.
Don described EPA's analyzer calibration philosophy, empha-
sizing that overlapping cal gases are important to ensure range-
to-range continuity, and that this practice helps to pinpoint
standards that are deteriorating. A common manifold for span
gases eliminates the variability of calibration span gases from
site-to-site. EPA performs a span check/mid-span check and a
quarter-span check during calibration. A summary of the above is
contained in the Appendix.
Current EPA analyzer ranges are:
HC (ppm C3HQ)
0-250
0-100
0-50
LCO (ppm)
0-1000
0-500
0-250
0-100
HCO (ppm)
0-5000
0-2500
co2I
0-5 . 0
0-2 . 5
0-1.0
NOx (ppm)
0-250
.0-100
0-50
EPA - NOx Converter Efficiency
The NOx converter efficiency is performed once a week.
Although 90% is the corrective action limit, typical values are
98%. A mixture of 1% oxygen in Argon was discussed as a poten-
tial ozone source to decrease the sensitivity of the ozonator..
A mixer is located in the efficiency checker to ensure a uniform
gas .
- 5 -
-------
EPA - Carbon Dioxide-Water Interference
The carbon dioxide and water response on the carbon
monoxide analyzers is checked every six months. A typical
result of .5 ppm response is experienced, with less than 3
ppm b.eing the maximum allowable response. A Hopcalite (MSA
product) scrubber is used to remove the carbon monoxide from
the zero air zero gas (Appendix).
EPA - Tracer Gas Injections
Propane injections are performed weekly using the Critical
Flow Orifice technique.^ Don explained that the density of pure
propane is 52.72 gms/ft at 68°F and 1 atmosphere whereas di-
luted propane is 51.88 gms/ft3. EPA is installing CFO manifold
systems using the orifices supplied by Turner Corp. A copy of
this information is in the Appendix. EPA has determined that
the proper equation to use with a CFO kit is:
(SCFM) q = ' (AP + C) / /Tabs
Bomb mass testing is also used at EPA, generally in con-
junction with evaporative SHED's (Appendix).
EPA - CVS Systems
Don described the procedure used by EPA in calibrating the
PDP and CFV type sampler systems. The equations and plots used
can be found in the Appendix. EPA uses a LFE and collects eight
data points per calibration with a tolerance of + 1% of the
curve as acceptable data. EPA does not calibrate through the heat
exchanger as Chrysler does. A discussion concerning the trace-
ability to NBS of the Meriam Laminar Flow Elements followed.
EPA has sent LFE units to Colorado Engineering Experiment Station,
Inc., for recalibration. Copies of typical calibration data are
included in the Appendix. The question of how well the calibra-
tion .supp1ied by Meriam and a recalibration by the Colorado Engin-
eering Experiment Station, Inc., performed on a new unit agreed
was asked. No one present had ever had a new unit recalibrated;
only units having prior use had been recalibrated. It was stated
that the new units received from Meriam have a calibration trace-
able to NBS.
GM - Cell-to-Cell Correlation
Mike Briggs explained the technique used by GM to cross
check their bag sites. Weekly, a bag of high concentration and
a bag of low concentration exhaust emissions are generated using
a vehicle and CVS. The bags are initially checked on a reference
site, and then analyzed on each cell, operating or not. The
reference cell is changed each week. In order to correct for
- 6 -
-------
nitric oxide decay, the bags are read periodically on the
reference cell during the testing of the other cells. A
statistical analysis is made to identify outliers outside
of two sigma. Hydrocarbon results will differ and the
relative response of the FID is suspected. A GC analysis is
also performed on the bag. Mike stated that the mid-span
on all bag ranges is checked once daily and must be within
+ 2% of the value of the gas.
A zero and span check is performed per each bag group
and must be + 0.2 MV in the pretest and + 1.0 MV in the post-
test check. A digital voltmeter and recorder are used in the
test cells.
GM - NOx Converter Efficiency
The NOx converter efficiency is checked daily on the
most sensitive range of the analyzer and in accordance with
the Federal Register test procedure. The minimum acceptable
limit at GM is 98% efficiency. A leak check is performed in
conjunction with the efficiency check. Carbon dioxide and
water vapor interference on the carbon monoxide analyzers are
checked each month. Analyzers must meet the Federal Register
specifications.
Additional monthly checks include bag analyzer curves,
NDIR optimization, and the FID methane response to approximate-
ly 60 ppm methane-air mixture. An equivalent factor of 1.12 +
.02 to C0H0 is typical.
J o
GM - CVS System
Tom Slaughter discussed the CVS systems. The
GM systems are the Positive Displacement Pump type and are
connected to a data acquisition computer. The make-up air sup-
plied to the CVS is provided by an external air supply. Many
questions were asked concerning the make-up air and the system
used for controlling the humidity, etc.
GM - CVS Calibration
A daily propane injection is run on the CVS system using
the CFO technique. A + 2% agreement is required. GM uses the
real gas density of propane and assumes the purity to be 100%.
The initial calibration is performed using a LFE on the CVS out-
let. GM plans to use a Smooth Approach Orifice instead of the
LFE for calibrating the CVS systems because the LFE system cali-
bration changes as the unit gets contaminated.
- 7 -
-------
Agenda Items IV, V, VI, and VII are presented individually
as follows:
IV. Dynamometer Systems
Chrysler
Chrysler uses the Clayton, direct drive, variable
inertia flywheel and automatic roadload control
equipped dynamometers. The dynamometers are operated in
the automatic roadload mode with additional control pots
added to the initial system to enable the use of the auto-
matic roadload feature on non-standard horsepower settings.
In some instances, the dynamometers are operated in the
manual mode. Chrysler is planning to add 125 lb. increment
inertia weight capability, dial-a-horsepower thumbwheels,
and digital speed and horsepower meters to the existing
dynamometers, Distance measurement equipment has recently
been added to the dynamometers. The dynamometers are cali-
. brated every thirty days.
The roadload horsepower is checked each test as is the
speed calibration of the driver's aids. The inertia weight
engagement is verified by the test cell operator before
the test. A quick coastdown technique has been used by
Chrysler to spot check the dynamometer horsepower calibrations.
This technique can be performed after the dynamometer warm-up.
It requires that the same vehicle be used and instead of lift-
ing the vehicle from the dynamometer, the coast time is re-
corded while the vehicle remains on the dynamometer. This
technique is quick and provides immediate results when the
test site is equipped with an on-line data acquisition system.
The roller spacing on all of the dynamometers is 17.25
inches, except for three truck dynamometers, which have a
20.00 inch spacing.
Ford
Ford uses Clayton, direct drive, variable inertia fly-
wheel, roadload control dynamometers with 17.25 inch spacing.
The dynamometers are currently operated in the automatic road-
load mode. Weekly frictional horsepower and roadload horse-
power determinations are performed using the Federal coastdown
procedure. Ford has a special vehicle equipped with built in
lifts that reduces the amount of time required to perform coast-
d?wns. The driver's aid is checked daily by comparing the number
of dynamometer roller revolutions vs. the time at a specific
speed with an allowable tolerance of + 0.1%. The tach gener-
ator voltage versus speed calibration is checked bi-monthly
using a digital counter with a tolerance of + 10 rpm of the
set point.
- 8 -
-------
GM
GM uses the Clayton direct drive, automatic roadload
control dynamometers with 17.25 inch roller spacing. The
dynamometers are operated in the automatic roadload control
mode. The Clayton dynamometers electronics have been modi-
fied to provide thumbwheel horsepower selection capability.
Further modifications have been made as explained in EPA/
Industry Symposium f/1.
GM uses a computerized program utilizing the least
squares linear curve fit to generate the indicated horsepower
versus the actual horsepower data.
The dynamometer rollers have been machined to give a
uniform roller circumference and solid bearing supports have
been employed. The dynamometers have been aligned using a
laser beam.
A full dynamometer speed and horsepower verification is
performed every thirty days using a special coastdown vehicle.
The speed is calibrated using a line synchronized stroboscope.
A horsepower check is performed before and after each test.
EPA
EPA uses the Clayton direct drive variable inertia fly-
wheel, automatic roadload control dynamometers with 17.25 inch
roller spacing. EPA operates in the automatic roadload mode.
A chart showing the statistics for the distance traveled dur-
ing the various phases of the FTP and HWFE cycle was discussed.
The chart is contained in the Appendix. A brief summary is:
FTP (812 tests)
Cold transient - 3.6058 mi,
Cold stabilized - 3.9010 mi,
Hot transient - 3.6067 mi,
HWFE (691 tests) - 10.295 mi,
The rear roller revolutions are monitored using an en-
coder that gives 320 pulses per revolution, which are total-
ized at 10/rev.
The EPA calibration techniques and supporting data are
contained in detail in the EPA/Industry Symposium //I proceed-
ings .
- 9 -
-------
V. Total System Checks
Ford uses the exhaust flow simulator daily for a
total system check. The simulator uses critical orifices
to inject known amounts of emissions components.
Chrysler uses a correlation vehicle on a weekly basis
to cross check the total system of each cell. A hot 505
cycle is run using the running start technique. The
vehicle oil and water temperatures are stabilized using a
40 mph steady state prior to the test. On a monthly basis
vehicles are switched from the Proving Grounds and Highland
Park for a facility-to-facility comparison.
The correlation limits are:
HC
CO
NOx
CM
Ol
Gms/Mi.
1.40
8.5
3 . 3
600
% Variation
5.0
10 . 0
8 . 0
3.0
HC
CO
NOx
co2
Gms/Mi.
0.5
4 . 0
2 . 3
670
% Variation
10.0
15 .0
O
O
3.0
Typical data are contained in the appendix.
GM checks each site every day using a vehicle and
evaluates the data statistically using a two week moving
average. If a cell has two successive CO2/NOX readings that are
are outliers, the dynamometer is checked.
VW stated that an automatic driver reduces data variation
on cell-to-cell total systems checks.
Dick Lawrence, of EPA, discussed the effect that the
calibration of the thermometers can have on the KH factor.
If a facility is using ,a wet and dry bulb apparatus using
mercury thermometers that are not matchedj an error can be
introduced that will have a significant effect on the KH
factor. He further stated that EPA intends to purchase a
dewpoint instrument for evaluation.
Don Paulsell stated that an effective cell correlation
program should have both small (2000 lb. inertia) and a large
(4000 lb. inertia) vehicle involved in the program.
- 10 -
-------
VI.
SHED
Chrysler has 3 SHED's at the Proving Grounds, one
AESI and two Eller, equipped with internal and external
cooling. The AESI is 10' x 8' x 21' with a total volume
of 1680 ft.-^ and the Ellers are 10' x 10' x 24' with a
total volume of 2400 ft.^.
GM Proving Grounds has six SHED's, five with a volume
of 1850 ft.^ and one with a volume of 2560 ft.3. The
systems were designed by the MVEL. A list of the details
is contained in the Appendix.
VII. State-of-the-Art Diagnostic Techniques
Everyone involved in emissions testing is striving to
develop quality control monitoring techniques that can be
performed during the course of the testing. The amount of
non-productive time expended in performing the necessary
quality control checks can be reduced, while at the same
time providing the assurance that a facility is producing
valid data.
Don Paulsell discussed some of the EPA techniques that
are part of the data processing program for the FTP and
HWFE tests. A list of these parameters and the limits used
to assess abnormal data are shown in the Appendix.
- 11 -
-------
AGENDA
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES'
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - A:00 P.M.
I. Bag Analyzer
Cell-to-Cell Correlation
Daily Calibration - Range to Range Span Checks
NOx Converter Efficiency Check
Water and Carbon Dioxide Interference Checks
II. CVS Systems
Description of the CVS Systems
Method of Primary Calibration
III. CVS Systems Sample Integrity
Tracer Gas - Propane Injection
Bag Leak Checks
System Leak Checks
Hydrocarbon Hangup
- LUNCH 11:30 A.M. - 12:30 P.M. -
IV. Dynamometer System
Driver's Aid Calibration
Roller Revolution Monitoring - Distance
Measurement Equipment
Speed Check
Roadload Horsepower Check
Frictional Horsepower Check
Inertia Weight Monitoring and Horsepower
Monitoring During Test
V. Total System Checks
Correlation Vehicles
Mass Flow Simulator
. Analysis Techniques _ BKEAK _ 15 MIliuTES _
VI. SHED
Calibration
Leak Check
Propane Retention
Temperature Monitoring
Background Check
Vli-r.; State of the Art Diagnostic Techniques
Shortcomings of Present Methods
Productive (during the test) Techniques for
Quality Control
Special Equipment
I I
-------
1. Attendance List
APPENDIX
2. Ford Motor Company
Agenda Item I
Agenda Item II
Agenda Item III -
Bag Analyzer
CVS Systems
CVS Systems Sample Integrity
Chrysler Corporation
Agenda Item I
Agenda Item II
Agenda Item III -
Bag Analyzer
CVS Systems
CVS Systems Sample Integrity
4. General Motors Corporation
Agenda Item I - Bag Analyzer
Agenda Item II - CVS Systems
Agenda Item III - CVS Systems Sample Integrity
5. Environmental Protection Agency
Agenda Item I - Bag Analyzer
Agenda Item II - CVS Systems
Agenda Item III - CVS Systems Sample Integrity
6. Agenda Item IV - Dynamometer System
a. Ford Motor Company
b. Chrysler Corporation
c. General Motors Corporation
d. Environmental Protection Agency
7. Agenda Item V - Total System Checks
a. Chrysler Corporation
b. Environmental Protection Agency
8. Effect of Accuracy of Wet and Dry Bulb Measurement
on Kh Factor
9. Agenda Item VI - SHED
a. Ford Motor Company
b. General Motors Corporation
10. EPA In-Process Quality Control Techniques
•5
-------
A T T E
NDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name:
Roy J. Dennison
Company:
NHTSA,. Auto Fuel Econ., NFE-20
Address:
Washington, D. C. 20590
Telephone:
(202) 755-9384
Name:
N. E. March
Company:
Chrysler Corporation
Address:
P. 0. Box 1118, Detroit, Mich. 48288
Telephone:
(313) 956-4892
Name:
William G. Mears
Company r
Mobil Res. & Dev. Corp.
Address:
Paulsboro, N. J. 08066
Telephone:
(609) 423-1040, Ext. 2442
Name:
Shumpei Hasegawa
Company r
American Honda
Address:
394D Research Park Dr., Ann Arbor, Mi. 48104
Telephone:
(313) 994-8441
Name:
Paul Colpnorea
Company:
Ford Motor Co., Dearborn Emission Lab.
Addres s:
21500 Oakwood, Dearborn, Michigan
Telephone:
(313) 323-3726
Name:
Richard Morgan
-Company:
Allied Chemical Corp.
Address:
353 Cass Avenue, Mt. Clemens, Mich. 48043
Telephone:
(313) 469-2900
iS
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9 :00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Aaron R. Martin
EPA, Mobile Source Enforcement Div. (EN-340)
401 M St., S.W., Washington, D. C. 20460
(202) 755-2575
Name: Kevin Kott
Company: EG&G Automotive Research, Inc., Virginia
Testing Lab
Address: 6206 Gravel Ave. (Franconia)
Alexandria, Virginia 22310
Telephone: (703) 971-8823
Name: James W. Caldwell
Company: EPA-MSED (EN-340)
Address: 401 M St., S.W., Washington, D. C. 20460
Telephone: "(202) 755-9396
Name: Masafumi Yamazaki
Company: Nissan (Datsun) Motor Co., Ltd.
Address: 56O Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07024
Telephone: (201) 871-3555
Name: Kenneth E. Inman
Company: Chrysler Corporation
Address: P. 0. Box 1118, Detroit, Mich. 48288
Telephone: (313) 956-4056
Robert E. Rice
Chrysler Corporation (Proving Grounds)
Chelsea, Michigan
(313) 475-8651, Ext. 381
Name :
Company:
Addres s:
Telephone:
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
15
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
John L. Tichy
Chrysler Corporation
P. 0. Box 1118, Detroit, Mich. 48288
(313) 956-4892
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
Thomas A. Davis
Ford Motor Co. AAD60
17000 Oakwood Blvd., Dearborn, Mich.
(313) 337-9109
Name:
Company:
Address :
Telephone:
J. 0. Cha s e
D.O.E., Energy Research Center
P. 0. Box 1398, Bartlesville, Ok. 74003
(918) 336-2400
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
Dick Lawrence
EPA
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48105
(313) 668-4353
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
Robert Kopacz
EPA
Ann Arbor, Mich. 48105
(313) 668- 4386
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
John Kargul
EPA
Ann Arbor, Mich. 48105
(313) 668-4399
\ G
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name: Roger Dornberger
Company: EPA
Address:
Telephone:
Name: Thomas L. Slaughter
Company: General Motors Proving Grounds
Address' Milford Vehicle Emis. Lab., Milford, Mich
Telephone: (313) 685-5544
Name. ^ ^_ Pearsall
Company: . EPA
Address:
Telephone:
Name: Glen D. Reschke
Company: EPA
Address:
Telephone: (313) 685-4254
Name: A. E. Cleveland
Company: EPA, Certification Div. LDVB
Address:
Telephone:
Name: paul M. Reece
Company: EPA, Laboratory LDT
Address:
Telephone: (313) 685-4445
-------
.ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name: Robert Gilkey
Company: EPA A2 ¦
Address: Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Telephone: (313) 685-4397
Name: a. Papay
Company: Mercedes-Benz of N.A.
Address: One Mercedes Dr.,Montvale, N. J. 07645
Telephone: (201) 573-2642
Name: John D. Myers
Company: Clayton Manufacturing Co.
Address: 24750 Swanson, Southfield, Mich. 48075
Telephone: (313) 354-2220
Name: Carlo Cucchi
Company: Fiat
Address: Park Lane Tower West, Suite 1210
1 Park Lane Blvd., Dearborn, Mich. 48176
Telephone: (313) 336-3515
Name: Alan A. Morris
Company: American Motors Corp.
Address: .14250 Plymouth Road, Detroit, Mich.
Telephone: (313) 495-2960
Name: Mike Briggs
Company: General Motors Proving Grounds
Address: Milford, Mich. 48042
Telephone: (313) 685-5275
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name: E> Martin
Company: International Harvester Company
Address: 2911 Meyer Road, Ft. Wayne, Ind. 46803
Telephone: (219) 461-5685
Name: Potochnik
Company: Chrysler Corporation
Address: P> 0< Box ms, Detroit, Mich. 48288
Telephone: (313) 956-5060
Name: Kenneth L. Downing
Company: Chrysler Corporat ion
Address: 12206 E. Slauson, Santa Fe Springs, Calif. 90670
Telephone: (213) 698-3477
Name: George F. Mc Caskey
Company: Chrysler Corporation
Address: p. q. Box 1118, Detroit, Michigan 48288
Telephone: (313) 956-4959
Name: Walter Frankvoort
Company: Dutch Service of Metrology, van Swinden Lab
Alph. Diepenbrockhof 2, The Hague,
Address: Netherlands
Telephone:
070-6878 70
Names Ted Bayler
Company: NHTSA
Address: 400 7th St., S.W., Washington, D. C. 20590
Telephone: (202) 755-9384
_
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
®ame" Louis C. Broering
Company. Cummins Engine Co., Technical Center
Address: Columbus, Indiana
Telephone: (312) 379-6455
Name. Gerhard F. Lach
Company: VWoA
Address: 3560 Marino Rd., Toledo, Ohio 43609
Telephone: (419) 536-6470
Name: John H. White
Company: . ;epa
Address: ^nn Arbor, Michigan
Telephone: (313) 685-4255
Name: Bruce R. Gardner
Company:- Ford Motor Company
Address: 21500 Oakwood Blvd., Dearborn, Mich. 48124
Telephone: (313) 322-5227
Name: Serge M. DuBuc
Company: Emission Testing Lab., Environment Canada
Address: E.T.L., River Road, Ottawa, Ontario
Telephone: (613) 998-9590
Name: Geo Derrig
Company: Allis Chalmers Corp.
Address: Box 563, Harvey, Illinois 60426
Telephone: (312) 339-3300, Ext. 519
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name: John D. Harrod
Company: Cummins Engine Co., Inc.
Address: 1900 McKinley Ave., Columbus, Indiana 47201
Telephone: (812) 379-5335
Name: j_ M_ xrapp
Company: Cummins Engine Co., Inc.
Address: 1900 Mc Kinley Ave., Columbus, Indiana 47201
Telephone: (812) 379-5335
Name: Steve Whittier
Company: Ford Motor Co., Scientific Research Laboratory
Room E-2212
Address: 21500 Oakwood Blvd., Dearborn, Mich. 48121
Telephone: (313) 323-3301
Name: Geoffrey R. Jones
Company: Ford Motor Company, Emissions Test Lab.
Address: 1500 Enterprise Drive, Allen Park, Mich. 48121
Telephone: (313) 322-3458
Name: Daniel A. Reis
Company: Jeep Corp.
Address: 949 N. Cove Blvd., Toledo, Ohio
Telephone: (419) 470-7453
Name: Phillip Ingram
Company: General Motors Proving Grounds (V.E.L.)
Address: Milford, Michigan
Telephone: (313) 685-6376
-------
ATTENDANCE ROSTER
EPA/INDUSTRY QUALITY CONTROL SYMPOSIUM
INTRA-LABORATORY TEST SITE/EQUIPMENT
QUALITY CONTROL TECHNIQUES
October 5, 1977
9:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.
Name: E> H> Howell
Company: International Harvester Co.
Address: 2911 Meyer Road, Ft. Wayne, Ind.
Telephone:
Name: Bruno Rapetti
Company: Fiat - Italy
Address: Str. Del Drosso 145, Torino, Italy
Telephone:
Name: Wolfgang Groth
Company: Volkswagen of America
Address: 818 Sylvan Ave, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 07632
Telephone:
Name: Daniel R. Wamboldt
Companyr American Motors Corp.
Address: 5626 - 25th Ave.
Telephone:-Kenosha, Wis. 53140
^ame" Frank E. Johnson
Company: Chrysler Corporation
Address: p_ Box 1118> Detroit, Mich. 48288
Telephone: (313) 956-3135
Name:
Company:
Address:
Telephone:
—
-------
MISCELLANEOUS
QC CHECK TECHNIQUE
Wet/bry Psychrometer Sling Psychrometer
Test_Cell Vacuum Gauge Mercury Manometer
Barometer Calibration Mercury Barometer
FREQUENCY
Daily
6 Months
Monthly
ACCURACY
* 5 grains H^O/lb air
t .5 in Hg
1 .01 in Hg
APPENDIX 2 BRUCE GARDNER, FORD
-------
cvs/analyzer system
qc CHECK
TECHNIQUE
Analyzer Calibration
Gas Bottle
NOx Converter Efficiency per Fed. Reg.
CVS Flow Calibration
LFE
CVS Timers
Stopwatch-3 min.
CVS Verification
Mini-propane or
gravimetric
CVS Temperature
Recorder Calibration
Resistance
CVS/Analyzer System
Exhaust gas
simulator
FREQUENCY
ACCURACY
30 Days
7 Days
6 Months
30 Days
30 Days
! 1*
97%
t .05 const
* 1 sec.
+ 256
6 Months
+
Daily
t 5%
APPENDIX 2
BRUCE GARDNER
-------
Copy number— ?
CHPvsirs corporation fission development testing
B L 0 W F P CALIBRATION P R 0 fi P A M
••««»«o©
•CVS-HfATH 22 o
iLIbpation ppffopmfo on-«3/o2/77 or hcwney
0*E» SPEED NUmBFR thref
The LFE used VAW33??1R1
" IS IFF has A SLOPE OF 114.47 AN3 AN INTERCEPT OF 6.74
IE El F*ENT WAS MoUNTfr SfFpRt THE CVS
S ^Ff ALIBkATION *ITW B3r« BLCtotR H359
DELTA e
PUMP pPM
CFm
cf/rev
1
•
«
a
i
•
•
«
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
••••••
IS
135S.0
417
0
.3075
1ft
135*.n
415
6
• 3067
17
1354*?
~ 14
3
• 3059
18
1353*3
~ 13
9
• 3052
19
13S?»4
~U
7
• 304^
20
135l•*
~ In
4
• 3C37
21
135*.7
~ 09
2
• 3030
2?
134Q«9
~08
3
• 3023
23
1349*«
~ 06
A
• 3016
24
134« o J
~ 05
7
• 3009
25
1347.3
404
6
• 3003
26
134ft.4
~ 03
4
• 2996
27
134*«A
~ 0?
3
• 2990
28
1344.7
~ 01
2
• 2984
29
1343.M
~ Op
2
• 2978
30
I343*n
399
1
• 2972
31
l34?„i
39*
1
• 2966
3?
1341.?
397
I
• 29ft0
33
1340•4
396
3
• 2953
34
1339.-1
395
0
• 2949
3S
133P.7
394
1
• ?944
36
1337.P
393
1
• 2938
37
1336.9
39?
1
• 2933
38
133^•1
391
2
• 2928
39
1335.?
39n
2
• 2922
40
1334*4
389
3
• 29J7
Z 5
APPENDIX 3
-------
gfgps ft a if m tm
m m
yijii-W^CTaywi ni^WwlB .«*.* . !»!¦ |-| ->Y —
Mtksas^'po?'
-------
3.
uttTasgspBrnoei mxFicmos
em vvbaw zuktioh w/cro
cwmm
Vm&BBSm 3150
cos csssmemoa
d&iss 10-$'*) 7
* Potiiiv* •rron eay bo daa tot
I) A toraiM las
a) Cubic (eet par tawluelm (CVS Slav seta)
b> Ialat tanpeeateee
c) '. Bsdanwnd ewwtntiM
2). Aa tacraeaa iat
k)^Ialfis:>taitesa
c) fiara»tsls pmms
4) ilmlttlca canur
a) Spaa.
C8L1» WSgga CVS BD8SSS AVB2AGB 1 E3B0S* KMGIHgBR
1 /-** # ?
2 _J 1L fl.U o.*
S - 10 O-SlO'%
—— *-7
* _: is. -a.?[-13 up
i « 9 ** 0-¥[-0'9
* —2-1. -0-3/-Q-f _U£_
5 ¦ 11 ~l<0 J-bt UP
* • US 1'^ o-f W
* Utayttw errors aey be tea to dta opposite of aocb of tba sbow positive errors,
or to a law ia tba CV8 ar analytical eystm.
i Rny it>fl4lilOAS tCaofa&l &S&T*-
tl*. CVS NIA^ &€, ti3*d -fair t$*3&ln<^r
fCVsZ ~ ICP& % /0Q « ( ^
fcp»I.
^•~7 APPENDIX 3
-------
ROLLS QPFPATnp.q naTT.v CHECK LIST
PAHS: /£?-_?- 77 brl i h"l': / ROLLS: 2 ? OPERATOR: M. P. ^Q/?£A/ S£AJ
LEAK CHECKS
T«?. BENCH
CO2 DILUTE
CO2 EGR
ENG. BENCH
3AG BENCH
C.VoS. SAMPLE. SYS.
3AG ""#1
SAG £2
BAG #3
BAG #4
BAG #5
BAG #6
TUNE^stm PRESSTIRE cv-irv
OK
V
£
7?
T7"
~
Z
£
TONE
3AG BENCH
CO
C02
NOx
HC
T.P, BENCH
LO CO
SICO
co2
GAIN
samp. g. q2 p.
CO-
cat
ho'
EC
DILUTE
ECU
ENG. BENCH
LO CO
HI CO
CO 2
NO
HC
C.V.S. PARAMETERS
i'ilMP. J -
INLST..OEF;
PHSSS*
-j; i-
COg-grCk '
SANGER.121 'ZERO
DRY C^'.RESPQNSS
WET C0 2- RESPONSE
HY^gASS-:.'PLc:r, 'RATE r^v.rr
T.P. ™
C02 DXLt
C02 2GR
ESS. BENCH
a
-------
mmm
J
V)
¦9
k
n
X
j ^
1
x:
-------
ft V*-^4tv;-*
"V-
1 ' •- ¦ »'¦"¦
5'
I
\T)
"O
K
«""f>
nj
"X
> \
4
.K
-------
J_ | Ml
>
w
2!
t)
M
X
w
o
Ed
Z
CO
o
z
(Jt
J*
o
tv.
n
33
>-<
w
t-1
M
73 ¦
paqe 1« D D «n»atUeilctorY
Data * R»P-__
nni
liswNingwi • !jJ
05721 [T7S>g>-ygO \C
toil lingua |hm c*
.ISSUE
DATE
9-8-77
- ¦; - \
REV I
1
DATE |
1
-------
/tPPZ&b/'A I nbMusrt Ctfcz
-------
-------
fy-fifBAJ^f'K-3
3H
pr sjo/U>6 C tj*. 1
-------
)00 PPM C$ Ha
"726 PPM CO
COt
2o% o%
BAL. Nz
32 PPM A/O
0AL Ni
>
>t3
W
53
a
w
x
ti
c-l
o
33
5S
CO
o
3
o
EC
5«
~<
CO
r1
w
?3
COftRCLATtOH CHECH
mmzzRs $ F/ll
(A) OFF (B)
caub gas
^ T/NE 4/ 9
CVS &4<*
COMPOSITE MtXWftE
20 PPM C^Hq
!U5 PPM CO
J.8 % CO2.
4% oz
3AL. Nj>
MG CART mo/FtCtfr/O
/
a/ t common
2. A/OfiMfiLLf ClOSEO
1/M I 3 normally of
\(A) «
A/
dol'slE 7hrqw cmrEfi orr sw/rai
MOUNTED ON BAG CAFT7
¦ %
' c
ro f?£# p test <$/) s,
/.) ANALr71 2HMPL£ PUMP OH.
H.) SWITCH "OFF"/
60 CYCLE &PCGH THRU VfiRiOVS BftGS.
TO FILL BAGS.
/.) OPCON (N "SAG R£AD.
2.) SfiiMfLE PUMP "OFF.'
3.) 5WITC// TO "£/!& F/U\
q>) C YCl 5 OPCOM r/f\JU VH'\
UJ
£-14-71 DRS
-------
/e* .
MINI-PROPORTIONER® ^
805-2000 for 2 Gas Mixtures/805-2001 for 3 Gas Mixtures
A Portable, Extremely Accurate Gas Mixing System
The MINI-PROPORTIONER® is a portable, ex-
tremely accurate gas mixing system, Used to
blend two or three gases in exact proportions, it is
ideal for inert gas welding, atmospheres (forming
gas mixtures), generator cooling and other
commercial applications.
The MINI-PROPORTIONER® has important fea-
tures found only in very expensive stationary
proportioners. It is a demand type proportioner
with built-in mixed gas reservoir and regulator to
maintain constant pressure and flow of mixed
gas to the work station. High flow capabilities to
200 scfh and afour-station manifold permits up to
four operators to use the proportioner simul-
taneously.
This proportioner is easy to use. Simply con-
nect to gas supply, set supply regulators to 75 psi
and the proportioner does the rest. This unit has
no electrical requirements, weighs only 30
pounds and can be used anywhere.
Features
• Extremely accurate ± 0.5% of exact mixture.
• Each unit is factory set to meet usar's require-
ments.
* ¦ '3J> V ' '•••' '¦
• Simple to use
• Constant delivery pressure is maintained by a
built in regulator. Set at 15 or 30 psig.
• Economical
• Weighs only 30 pounds.
• A unique mechanical cycler precisely controls
mixing.
• Demand Proportioner utilizes a mixed gas res-
ervoir with s?.fetv relief valve.
• Manifold has 4 ou*fets.
• High gas f! -v capability — to 200 scfh.
Benefits
Accurate gas mixtures for protective welding
atmospheres.
Tamper proof — Operator cannot inadvertantly
change gas mixture.
Minimum set up time
4
Versatile
Eliminates the need to buy pre-mixed gas
Portable — easily carried and used anywhere
No electrical requirements
Minimum maintenance — no solenoids to
replace
Safety — Internal pressure protection
As many as 4 operators can use the MINI-
PROPORTIONER® at once.
For increased capacity two or more MINI-
PROPORTIONERS® may be used in parallel.
Specifications:
Inlet Connections:
Major Gas — 5/a-18 R.H. Internal
Minor Gas — 5/s-18 R.H. External for C02,
argon, helium or nitrogen
— 9/16-18 R.H. Internal for oxygen
— 9/16-18 L.H. Internal for
hydrogen
-------
MINI-PROPORTIONER® (continued)
Outlet Manifold has 4 ea. V N.P.T. Internal
Threads
2 Plugged
2 Valves with %-18 R.H.
Internal Threads
Delivery Pressure 15 or 30 psi (preset).
Inlet Pressure 75-100 psi depends on outlet
pressure.
Max Flow 160-400 scfh (most mixtures 200
scfh);
Capable of 2 or 3 gas mixtures in any proportion
— Gases include argon, C02, oxygen, nitrogen,
helium and hydrogen (except for explosive mix-
tures).
How To Order
1. Specify the stock number of the appropriate
proportioner.
Stock no. 805-2000 for mixing 2 gases.
Stock no. 805-2001 for mixing 3 gases.
2. Specify the gases to be mixed and the mix-
ture by percent of each gas.
3. Specify delivery pressure requirements.
NOTE: The proportioner is factory set to deliver
at 15 p.s.i.g. unlejs otherwise specified.
Equipment Required for Accurate Control
Regulators — The MINI PROPORTIONER® is calibrated at 75 p.s.i.g. inlet pressure. Two stage reg-
ulator's with deliveiy capability of 75 p.s.i.g. are recommended. Airco regulators are listed below:
Cylinder Regulators
Gas
Service
Stock
No.
2Vi" PSI
Pressure
Gauges
Max. Flow
CFH
Max. Work
Pressure
PSI
Connections
CGA No.
Inlet
Outlet
co2*
806-8005
200 & 2000
135
120
320
.830-14 R.H. Int.
"B" %-18 R.H. Int.
Argon
Nitrogen
806-8420
200 & 4000
975
100
540
.908-14 R.H. Int.
"B" %-18 R.H. Int.
. Argon
Helium
Nitrogen
; .806-9402
200 & 4000
975
100
580
.960-14 R.H. Ext.
"B" Va-18 R.H. Int.
Nitrogen
806-8427
200 & 4000
975
100
550
.908-14 L.H. Int.
"B" % -18 R.H. Int.
Hydrogen
806-9453
200 & 4000
975
100
350
.830-14 L.H. Int.
"B" »/.s-18 L.H. Ext.
Oxygen
8$B-8456
200 & 4000
975
100
540
.908-14 R.H. Int.
"B" 9/10-I8 R.H. Ext.
Helium
. 806-9458'.
200 & 4000
975
100
350
.830-14 L.H. Int.
"B" Va-18 R.H. Int.
*806-80% is an electrically heated C02 regulator.
Flow Control Equipment:
To fully benefit from the economies resulting
from proportioning gases, flow control equip-
ment should be used. Airco general purpose
(universal) flowmeters are listed for your con-
venience.
Fixed flow adapters are also available for use
where optimum constant flow r-.tes are known.
See ADI 1763 for details.
Universal Flowmeters
STOCK NO.
DESCRIPTION
FLOW RANGE
(S.C.F.H. AIR)
801-0430
Single Range
General Purpose
Flowmeter
3-56 @ 15 PSIG
4-68 @ 30 PSIG
805-1606
Dual Range
General Purpose
Flowmeter
Low
Scale
2-23 @ 15 PSIG
2-28 @ 30 PSIG
High
Scale
30-180@ 15 PSIG
35-220® 30 PSIG
5
-37
-------
C.V.S. SAMPLING SYPTE.Y CORRELATION
ROLLS 20
ROLLS 21]
ROLLS 22
ROLLS 2 3
ROLLS 24
r.OLLS 25
ROLLS26
ROLLS 27
SPAN
GAS
CALIB.
HC
CO
CO 2
NOx
O
O
%
JJ8-S
m. 7
3. oy
ZoTl
j fas
/y/o.a
3.04
20 7 7
/MZ
3.o 3
207.0
/fS.3
//// y
3.01
207> 7
/16.H
/yOf-6
J.oy
Zo7.S
nsj
/y// y
2^7.?
/7&s-
/V/6. y
S.03
Zo7>*i
xxxxxxx
XXXXlXXXXXXXXlXXXXXXXtf.
xxxxxxxxixxxxxxxx!
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX!
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX1
DIR.
FROM
BLEND.
HC
CO
CO 2
NOx
O
0
llsSZ
z.m
/va.D
I 66.^/
mz.z.
Z.CeO
SV8.C*
/1S7-6
2.6 1
/97.3
Z66.3
2o>3.^
2.4/
/yz?
/66*.6>
MW.O
2.6l
;66.6
ZO/o. Z.
2.6Z
/y^.7
\LCo.3
Zo2\.2
Z.Co\
/¥£. 7
XXXXXXX
xjpqc
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
xxxxxxxxi
XXXXXXXXl
XXXXXXXX1XXXXXXXX1
xxxxxxx!
XXXXXXXXX
BAG
#1
HC
CO
CO,2
NO*
0
Ib&Z
11*13
2.66
J&.4
M. 1
mo. i
^0
izirb
/67.6
/r?v.z.
2. C2
/Y1-6
/u:o
ms.3
2.3.1
/". 3
ZjeX.
Tz4%
/C6. S
ntz.f
2. to
ic±:3
mil
Z.6>C
/S"6. Z
IC,S>'3
muL
2.tt
H7 2
/66J
Zooj.c
2.6>Z
/Y&.6
/ 66.-ST
~ ZOZ.)
16>6.2
Zocti.%
2. 6Z
H7.0
/6s'/ J
2(?/i.S
2.^
/y^.7
XXXXXXX
BAG
#4
XXX3
HC
CO
CO2
NOx
XXXXXXXX
[<*¦'¦ ¦
0
. €)
, 1-
XXXXXXXii
/67J
M Y&.4
Z.teH
IH&H
[aaaaAa/s
/63-S
?80.7
•)
XXXXXXXX
166.9
2. 60
XXXXXXXX
/6S\J
Zoao>s?
Z. 60
J SCI
XXXXXXXX
/6£:a
/^75.7
2.6Z.
XXXXXXX
/66.3
200/.2
2. 62.
H7.3
XXXXXXXXX!
/6S". 6
ZoZ\M
~Z.Cs>\
/4f.l
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
xxxxxxx:-
nweocxfcx
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX
[XXXXXXX
kxxxxxx xx;
BAG.
#5
HC
CO .
CO2
NOx
%
-t-
/6b. 0
1133.1
2.6/
/Y 7./
1 66' 7
mZ.3
/66. 6
H76.7
2.61
/y7.s
i6V.fi
/??66
2.60
/<»•£. 6
/6<>:r
n?gj
2.6y
/V9
/1?K2L
2.60
/ 6-7.0
nn.&
Z-SS
If S.I I
XXXXXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXX>
XXXXXXX>
xKbhgGcx
bcxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxixxxxxxxxl
bcxxxxxx
(XXXXXXXXX
BAG
#6
HC
CO
C02
PQx
%
/66.1
mz.i
Z-63
IHJ.Z
IfcSY
°
H«.l
Z..6S
IH3.3 {
/67.0
2.0OZ.&
/ 2.62.
H8.\
It 7.^
I18Z4
Z. 61
m.4
/6S* 0
Zooo.o
Z.S1
ISC.C
\ l 66.1
2<*?5: Z
2. 6Z.
ISO-l
Z66.5-
Zooi.g
Z.&3
mn
1 66. /
Zo3Z.
-------
C.V.S. SAMPLING SYFTEK CORRELATION
CRITICAL FLOW BLENDER VJEEK OF UZS/TL
'
ROLLS 20
ROLLS 23
ROLLS 22
ROLLS 23
ROLLS 24
?.OLLS 25
ROLLS26
ROLLS 27
SPAN
GAS
CALIB.
HC
CO
co2
ife
O
O
<0
0
0
H8.S
H\Z.Z
2.01
Zol.C*
I7fi.fi
IH 10.0
Z.OH
Z&7. (a
imz
IHS3.1
2.01
Z01. 6
na.2
H8l 0
3.o3>
Zol-L
191.1
H81. /
2^07 •;
H &¦ H
mo.z.
3.0Z
Z075
XXXXXXX
xw
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
DIR.
FROM
BLEND.
HC...
CO
CO 2
Npx
%
0
0
9.Y
Zeiaz
2.65
H2.3
/d»7.2.
0
2oco.a
2.0Z
/Y6-f
/£»7.0
zoim
2.c*z.
/Y 75
xxxxxxx
XXXXI
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX)
BAG
#1
¦HC
ho,
NO*
0
0
* t-
\
Ko%&
'mn
2<*3
IS8.C*
l(ol
ims
2.C)
H&.B
/C7.3
Zoft.Co
2. <0(0
m.5
t Co
202 S". a
2.63
/€&. &
1113.0
Zxz
HZ. 7
IG7.I
Zozz.i
Z.c* 2
/y*3
XXXXXXX
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXX!
xxxxxxxx!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX!
BAG
#2
HC .
CO
C02
NOix
\
%
%
/6s:y
n&w
z. w
M.-L
/££.S
1138.2
2-6 3
f^ni
ZoKA
Z. c.1
H&o
/&?f
Zozz. 2
2.6 3
m.o
/67-f
2a5S.f
mrj
|
2c?3o.£s*|
^•^z. !
1
XXXXXXX
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx>
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXX!
BAG
#3
.¦W
'.CO'
'*®2
NOx
[V
<0
, '-¦¦¦¦. 1*
\
nn.i
2-6W
IHZ.Z.
1£>8>.M
2.CW
tL&.O
Zotz.l
2. Col
N8.1
IG8.1
Zoz^..sr
263
/Y6,1
/6a/
2oio. Z
2.6iT
i /Y6.2
IbC,.*)
ZOZC-. 2.
2.4Z.
HS.u
XXXXXXX
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
XXXXXXX^
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(XXXXXXXXX
BAG
#4-
HC
CO.
co2
NO>
0
*>-. Z
/70£V
z.&z
/YZZ.
/?YZ.3
2<2>Y
IXOH
1L&Z
Zofc.H
2.G.1
/i8.e>
1C.11
Zo&.l
2-6V
/yg.z
/677
2b
IH1-S
/4>*£
ZQ23./
2. (cC>
/Y32
/&£.Y
ZoZ*i.H
2GZ.
/S'O.7
5140 RAS 8/8/77 JT
fyPP£juj) k 3 C#* 1/
-------
HEftTH INTERNRTION RL, INC. (RICHWOUD INSTRUMENTS)
MOLUWE. SFMPLER NNITH REMOTE WLTER BOX
JdEfiEmMBMER, BIR INLET HEWED Rm\NftTER. CODLEB
. S\HQBB1LT. SLOWER
A SPEED LOUIS PiLUS PACEMAKER WDTDR
RfiU&E USEtl , 380 - 400. CFN\
Afi/>£vP/X 3
IP...
c/f*
-------
BAG CROSS-CHECK
- Z CONC. L£V£LS
- CORR. FOR NO DECAY
-STATISTICAL SEARCH
FOR OUTLIERS
¦ WEEKLY
VI
MlKE &M PG
-------
-ALL BAG, RANGES
-*2 % LIMIT
ZERO/SPAN
- PER BAG 'GROUP'
-"PRE' -.±0.2 mV
- 'POST'> * 10 *V
HZ.'
UK£ (2M#£
-------
m CONVERTER EFF
- FED. REG. PROCEDURE
¦ DAILY
¦LIMITS:
-98%
-LEAK CHECKS
MDfc V
H3
M «<£ &'GtS
-------
LEAK CHECKS
- PROPANE INJECTION
- BAG CROSS CHECK
¦ BULK STREAM LEAK
-SAMPLE SYSTEM LEAK
-------
MONTHL Y CHECKS
- H20 < C0Z INT
- BAG CURVES
- FID METHANE RESPONSE
¦NDIR OPTIMIZATION
ypp€A/oH 4
-------
CO, BAG CONCENTRATIONS
CVS REVS, 8„, AP
ROLL REVS
DVU
H fc.
/luxe sxids <2mp&-
-------
CVS SYSTEM
Descv'ipftoAJ
• PosYTYve D »*s p e n cajT Pu « p
• E. IccTrc^it Transducers - Pressure Te^pe^aT^re
• C©wTl*/tfOUS Mowito^iv^ of Q V S Rir] TesTtAt]
• E,x1cvwft.l Sec/rce of Diluti'ow /) Ir Supply
C a. I >' l> *"*• 1*«o^
• Not oa/ a. 3C"0«y Schedule
• £ a I i Li* fieri Vtfmif ied t>y Propose Inject/**/
• Propfcwe Pctr-Foi-wed D^'ily
• plou) Device - L FE
• LF E oa/ rAc Oottet
• PIam to use SAO Tec I,
• Ca It brA.t/0*> Revieu) atod Ul(i 'Ject'e>A>
HT
-------
-DAILY
- *27. AGREEMENT REQ'D
- ASSUME PURE PROPANE
¦ USE REAL &1S DENSITY
A-pfi£A/x*ft V
M 8
Ai"& 3&
-------
A NALV^ER CfiiL BR/Vtio^s
/}, H?M STROM E.MTS, RAN6£S^
/^ND CPtU6£A~rio/0 e\)/at/ons
TO PETECT PESiSAOftTloW />f\)D TO BETTER.
aST IM /VTE. VA L U£LS
£L. Range.-to-Ra6- Crte-c.ks
/. Sp/W, MtDSPflaJ, QTR.'SPAN
Aft#**)* S Dot) Paulsen-
-C
-o
-------
EPA Analy*e&
HC
LCO
HCO
250
looo
Sooo
loo
5c>0
Z5oo
So
ZSo
1 OO
EPA
Ranges
CQ^ N0X
S.o % 25o
Z.S% /OO
/. o % So
^ftc ¦P/kUseu^. ~ GPA-
-------
* _ I
5/~l C- Pp.Ot probleiws
/. SP/W /X ¦5~~ Dm Paulsen-
¦ 0\
-------
J1
NO X CoNueATBJZ. R PR C1 EAJCY
/, p£AFo£rt &AC£ P£i2. WEEK
2. r/vi//vio/v\ <=}0VO/ Typ/c/vtcy ^3+%
3. Mixea. //o Epfic/ewc-V lhecke^.
if- \%0^/A« FoK 0€©NE. Source.
CO^ /H2.Q ^T£«e FejZE/VCE.
1. Hopcfiu-re. + ££«o /)/R ^ CO/a) A)^
I I ^eAo
2. 3^»CO^/Aiz Bobbi^ed THftw /-/2O
3. 3 ppm w\AxiMOMf typically .S PPA\
Dot? &9u/s*u. -e**
-------
Sample. Analysis Correlation)
f\. OtJE Bfi>Gr/t>AY — f\LL LD AMACY€£R. SfTES
B. Ttoo U>£-£.« RoTAt i ors) SCHEDULE.
C. CorOTAoL. LlM ITS HC Co COj_ NO*
±lSiGMPt l.27o I.6Z .90% /.9 7.
C?. CorJT^oc. CLHAf^T Ft_A<=*s
~ S" Co/sJSecUTJl/£. "V—
/f/S" EXCEED 1 SI^/vtA
2/3 £^C££D 2. SIGAlfl
TEST ^KCCELPS 3
/)P/>E*3)/X S~ EtaU&MS£AL I&0A-
-------
E 3i
CVS CflLIBRftTI OM
f\. PJ>P TYPE.
"V .
Vc
^Tp.Pp
H
£P,V!
X*= «>l
AP
V = m /J
ap
y + b>
Kprv)T = n • AP +¦ a_
rems -6o
RpMA ~ s£comos
RpfV| = ^PMrt ^ 1.00 ±,01
^ KrtTto rpivl.
rf-Pfi£»2>/X £~
&AJ PfMgeU. -£P#
-------
CVS Calibration)
if.. JL
£>. CPV TYPE-
CI
rABs
= i.3%
o
Q
_ Qrvi£As_
QtH£o£.
Q-niS.128531^^
p = THROAT T>
-------
EPA Oil' -±
~7~/?/)c£
-------
DILUENT/SPAN
SELECTOR
CFo CROSSCHECK BA<=r-
BUEl^OE^ - SAE 77o/3*
VENT
FLOW
METER
0-2 SCFM
DIAMETER
0-60 PSI
0-60 PSI
SPAN
SELECTOR
BLENDING GASES
C3H8/AIR
N0/N2
C02/N2
C0/N2
/\ S~~
-------
TT&JErrB®!"
821 Park Avenue
Sycamore. Illinois 60178
(815) 395-4545
November 16, 1976
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Attention: Mr. Don Taulsell
Dear Mr. Taulsell:
Transmitted herewith are copies of Turner Company drawings S0-0001
and SO-0002 depicting our standard orifices and LP-3833, the filter
used with those orifices. As we discussed yesterday, we buy the
orifices from:
Starro Precision Products, Inc.
37 North Union Avenue
Elgin, Illinois 60120
Tel: 312/741-3382
And the filters are made by:
Sintered Metals Inc.
3390 Washington Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02130
If further Information is required or if I can be of assistance 1n
any way please contact me.
Very truly yours,
/eeorge Barton, P.E.
Manager, Operations Engineer
f^OTE '• "TtfC OAlPlCE- I** TtflS
PACKAGE. «*>AS CAuB&ATEJ>
Fo& A pRofiAWt
CfO AT £PA.
A Division of
Cleanweld Products, Inc
fiPPEA/bix 5"
J). Pth*i$£lL
-------
ART. NO.
OfiCVa PI ION
NO.
HOLE- 0\N
1 OE-(S>T \ F \ C. NT \ 0 M
P-40^o».R
£>0-00(>\-\3S,
ov-iS "ooos
_ ,0000
pumm - u\oY-\
BE.FORE. DI^ILUMG
3.
HOLE. DlK(SE.E_ CUKRT)
.0\5
.1-35 -
.OAOi.002.
>/A -ZT7 UNS-2N THD
PD .2/2.4.<5/.S.2.14
PART NO.
so-ooo\
-.3\3L HE.X
STOCK TOt
.\Q0 .094
DVK D\fV
"V^o +.000
•30° -.oos
¦ DIK
i. PLKtE.^
V .0*5X45°
A<*S
£. PLACES
S/> IC.fMWCIi
tt ore. r .0; t
X// OfC. ~ .001.
A».',t£ • r
O * \
TURNER CORPORA HON
n a-ov>;
i?
!6
—
S
QP.V
" ; r 7~
VO'Xn I-
-------
-------
P\RT fts.
LP-45?.A - R
LP
t-vmp»PTt&nj noix r>'i k i i ; s>.r i r i c t\~r i o»n
kc>. ^ |
si\cvCev.
J*. FLfv.SK
RE. PORE.
DAilllMG
SO-OOOcL- kZS
so
,C^5
a-.OOO^
-.0000
' : V
~ . 0 2- ¦>— -•«* V
¦2>
.Cfd.iPLMX-.-*" ~-
oo=>o
-.COO O
-.CO 05
oo&o
+ .0000
-.0005
01 SO +-000S
-.0000
PLM Ni
PLIMM - K\ FLNfert
BE-PORE. DRllumo
KOTE.:
K*CKH.L FLKSH
BLFORE.
DRlULlNGi
Note: THIS oKifice.
ia>As. tfS£T> po^
(V)£T&R/A)Gr CZritf
i;AiPa^- c£mcAt-
pLPU) CoaJ£>IT/£hOS-
7<2> PS/6-^ 90ftW1
FoA typical CVS.
.\S>0 DIK -1
¦D,0-°oo
.0<2>4 D\K
PART NO. /£•
SO-0002.
.01 R
E.CT \ 0 M K-K
M"1 1/4 D\fv RmD PCY
£RK^.S ROD
no. ooto i^n
* M ' "CO
T0'ff6» ' 7iOf4 (O
o
- .— q
r—.lei.St.0O2. DIN
*
I
.iSS DlK
.040± .00^-
-------
-------
ei
ci
<0
.i-
"©
.180
.117X005 Pi A
Change*
¦
I.
B b257l
kl8Q WAS .310
a 3/IQ/70 _tiq±.or? was cHAKarn to .int.oo*
,TOO''./7 /? HEL'ELAbE-
V-LCL-\ iLP-(fl07-\ iLF-^grl
LP .lP-WM j L p-^53-
' Lg^CiVvA 1
"*"¦ BRONZE1 olNrF.RF.D
POWDER^O JYHCROiN)
DO NOT SCALE DPAWINGS
STANDARD TOLERANCES
.XX DEC. i; 015
.XXX DEC. :t .005
ANGLE ± !•
SUPERCEDES I A
/ »
?5
)>)
uP
\y
)*)
>¦7)
FINISH:
SCALE
4.-"
NEXT
ASSEM.
D.L
DWG
Nixr
ASSEM,
CHKO I
-------
7.
A/05 TGAc£A&L&. LFL CAUg .
COLORADO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
OFFICE:
P. 0. Box 144
Boulder, Colo. 8C502
Phone: 3G J—443-1344
LABORATORY:
t. 0. Box 41
Nunn, CoLx 80648
Pbon: 303—-97-2340
CALIBRATION OF A MERIAM LAMINAR FL0W ELEMENT
MODEL: 50MC2-4SF SERIAL NUMBER: Y-72291R
FOR: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DATA FILE: EPA 1A DATE: 10 DEC 1976
INLET DIA: 4 INCHES THROAT DIA: 4 INCHES
TEST GAS: AIR STD DENSITY= 0.074916 LBM/CU-FT
AT STANDARD CONDITIONS OF 529.69—DEG-K* AND 14.696 PSIA«
DIFFt DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE IN INCHES OF WATER AT 70 DEG r
AC'FMS ACTUAL CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE
K FACTOR: ACFM*VISCOSITY/DIFF
REY NO: INLET(PIPE> REYNOLDS NUMBER
SCFM: STANDARD CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE # IS CALCULATED
F*oM CFV>
PRESS: PRESSURE AT INLET TAP IN PSIA
TEMP: INLET TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES RANK1NE
L
DIFF
ACFM
K FACTOR
REY NO
SCFM
PRESS
TEMP
1
1.216
66.71
5.5225
E-5
26791.
67.80
14.693
521.13
2
1 .809
99.29
5.5076
E-5
40073
101.20
14.698
519.77
3
2.392
130.38
5.4720
E-5
52612
132.90
14.703
519.91
¦:;4
2.975
161.70
5.4583
E-5
65151
164.65
14.696
520.23
5
3.587
194.70
5.4547
E-5
78366
198.15
14.699
520.59
6
4.188
226.13
5.4292
Z-3
90860
229.90
14.696
321.04
7.
4.816
259.23
5.4160
E-5
104080
263.49
14.703
521.40
8
5.406
290.88'
5.4163
E-5
116624
295.40
14.700
521.76
.9
6.019
322.67
5.3990
E-5
129236
327.48
14.699
522.03
10
6.658
356.30
5.3905
E-5
142392
361.42
14.696
522.21
11
7.274
388.26
5.3799
E-5
155250
393.71
14.702
522.57
12
7.621
406.01
5.3709
E-a
162263
' 411.61
14.703
522.73
13
7.627
406.08
5.3680
i-3
162216
411.52
14.698
522.80
, »y»
7.285
388.30
5.3752
E-5
155038
393.38
14.698
522.93
<*I5
5.433
291.04
5.4025
E-5
116178
294.82
14.699
523.02
.,il6
2.990
161.79
5.4561.
E-5
64604
163.92
14.699
522.93
l'7
1.209
66.37
5.5320
E-5
26566
67.36
14.708
522.39
18
0.640
35.37
5.5731
E-5
14148
35.87
14.703
522.48
.AVERAGE VALUES FOR ABOVE RESULTS:
Po M.7 PSIA DENSITY= 0.076074 LBM/CU-FT
T» 521.77 DEG R VISCOSITY= 1.0067E-6 LBM/INCH-SEC
Z" 0.99959 COMPRESSIBILITY FACTOR ^
c.
|4*.S x 'k!'*1
¦« J.0IS5 mo"* a
' jj
kjl/u It
2.
#K-» 110.4-
]•
OOS4, X<*
A Munp»pf» Corporation of Colorado for Soemttc and Educational Purposes
Tciting for ttie Public Sctcty
AfifiE/vbd
-------
s.
COLORADO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
OFFICE:
P.O. Box 344
Boulder, Colo. 80302
Phono: 30}—443-1344
LABORATORY:
P. 0. Box 41
Nunn, Colo. 80648
Phone: 303-897-2340
MQDELt 50MC2-4SF
DATA FILE: EPA1A
SERIAL NUMBEK: Y-72291R
DATE! 10 DEC 1976
X POINTS EXCLUDED FROM AVERAGES. K(AVE)= 5.4402E-5 ZDEV FROM K1
LCO) R/tOOO MTR HEAD L<0> -4 -3 -2 -1 0 ~! *2 *3 +4Z
08642086420864208642024680246802468024680
18 14.14 0.63951 0
17 26.56 1.209 1 0
2 40.07 1.8095 0
3 52.61 2.3919 0
16 64.6 2.9904 4 OS
5 78.36 3.5869 0
6 90.86 4.1884 . .0
7 104.08 4.8159 0
15 1 16.17 5.4334 8 OB
9 129.23 6.0188 0
10 142.59 6.6583 0
14 155.03 7.2849 11 0
13 162.21 7.6271 12 00
SpALE* ? 4
L0t 1.41 E+4 R 6.35 E+4
STt> DEV= 0.37 E-6
MAX DEV= 0.52 E-6
Mat 6.35 E+4 R 1.13 E*5
STD DEV= 0.19 E-6
MAX DEV/s -.27 E-6
Hit 1.13 E+5 K 1.62 E*5
STD DEV= 0.17 E-6
MAX DEV= 0.29 E-6
K= 5.52143 E-5
Z STD DEV= 0.666
2 MAX DEV= 0.936
K= 5.44286 E-5
% STD DEV=*0.351
Z MAX DEV=-0•494
K= 5.38779 E-5
2 STD DEV= 0.318
% MAX DEV= 0.529
RCAVEJ3 94591 K= 5.4402E-5
RtL0)= 32038. RCMD)= 80612. H(HI)= 142420.
K/K=
BASED ON
AT L= 8
1.01493
5 DATA PTS
CHAUV= 1.6
1 .00049 ^
5 DATA PTS
CHAUV= 1.597
0.99036
8 DATA PTS
CHAUV3 1.558
K » A + B+R «¦ C*R*R
Anv 5.5903E-5 B=-2.3589E-11
C= 6.5817E-17
y. ¦ X + Y**
-------
C/JL|BRflT/0/s) DATA
F06. LFE. #¦ _y- 722m
/a//d/76
.PftTA
Aj 1
u
'J
u :
i
6 7. SO
101,90
/2^,9o
Kt^A^
m, fs
QbZtf
34 712
3&IM3
391JI
mm
4/IS±
343^ S
*?4.
iM93
NAW
H. 7o3
/4. (cfru
/4AM
n^c*
H. loz
H.?oo
/ij.brt
m/ifa
N. 7oX
H 702
H (f/1
M.rfS
rt.CW
HAft
Pi 70S
H 703
±TfeBS_
SJl/3
Srt. 77
SMi
S$o.33
1&0.S9
Sctl.&l
&>l. 76
SM.03
5OC-"nfc*o O
TO <££LT Ibipo
\
I! i
*jj 0 5^.4'i °R iM.4'
, ii
:i Acfff^ * £CF^ .
/ ii
:l
• l'
! I
; 5
<<-/ =
7
!
CFr)^
FO
L> PS1
Hl.t.%
m.s v
*\j. * //o.
ACFfM .
x/srL^ 70-"
'ALEW\
£6,7/
W.3S
I (el. lO
IH 70
cP^r.^
Oto.SS
3^.£>7
35fc.3o
38$^£,
4C&<0l
4
^iSioSiTV
6x/ i to1
1,0057
1.0037
I.OoiT
i.oo»H
i,oort
1.0 ofb
I.OOfcl
/. oo(*l
|.W>7/
i.oovt
1,007*1
I.COfl
i.OQVZ
1,6 OS*/
/.00S&
/.OO^V
LOOlir
I.ool8
£SI
w=
X ,O0Sfk * >o
/0/tfS"
^¦K/0S
£>5^5*
5! 53 76
S^Uo
5"^3
&W7
SAiko
SAlUl
r.swo
r.3-TPu£.T>
-AP^-AP
-7
//o
V.P& SI
fofyo
lOHOgO
/Qi3S
IHJ&JJl
i $Z>50
l&.QIU
JS&38
lids if8
i%0^
ms
C 6
-------
ppdcfs^EO: ]?S'i':40 07-11-7/
O-ir out
«»» ar &Lf/'K caL'mkatIoN Cive A'JUYSJS «*»
««4 «»«
E'm Cel.IH AT TI'F
C AL T PWA TI ON ri A T(-
TFST SI TF Mltv-HF'
GAS ANALY'F'l
PIL'iFmT G'S
CONfrNTPA rin>: 11 rr
STA.MDAWD I A i wAir,r
O^E^AIOP ID MO
0: 0 V ;l_y/rl- WF Nnn-*
fl- 0- (1 INSTkU r 'JT ma MP
~v,i r»r t /.| th mo
pmipamE MnMM 1 ~"_/•!>
¦ >ViM*F MG;>i-.i. r LijjM
'r>p, \ ' I IS/;'it-
IH ( A|.m .j S Suiii-rr
220*7 ¦"LM'W OFCAL 1(1
SAV FLOW '' TH
"(Witm SI-T f-MNT
7f" > A IK PhFSS! 'f'F
FT"! fHFL mKi-.SSDkF
rrn sf,»<° PPFSS'WF
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ViLln UKFL. UPPEW LIMIT : 110.000
VALID Or.FL. L0V.FW LIMIT t -10.000
RftMGF change UPPE^ LI^IT : 100.000
KaNGE CHANGE LOwEK LIMIT : 20.000
full-scale (1001*) defl. s 100.000
full-scale (100%) voltage: 0.0
FULL-SCALE (100*) CONc. : 522.9
PfeCOPOE^ TY^E
FILF COMMr- MT : NOTE: * AX T w IS I 'I P»10 C
OPE°A TOP COMMENT : CFM vS r> F.> If K a V_V72^1'? '• 12/1n/7"
1 CYLINOFp
I M| •- Ml ir'i-
'•FTp.' |
-L< N'l 1
C'l IC-
MT-'A T T UNS
A' 1AL Y/c'
>J SIlif AL
CaLI«PATIOMl
CUKVE F I "DEVIATIONS 7
1 MUM8E-1
| J* .\h
I ~ GS 1
i-'ttTlO i
C Yl. I \"iF
•"f- ASUPEO
COtWEfTFi!
DATA |
*
%
* FROM LAST 1
1
1 Sl "•NI 1'
11 UENf 1
(MI.FN11FO)
CaLCdI.'• TFO
X
X
POINT 1
POINT
FULL-SCALF
CALIb«ATION 1
1
I X
1
11. 0
1
1
1
I
1
1 11 . 0
X 1
n.O 1
i). 0 1
0.0
Ss . <7
•<
1 2 • IS'1
l^.W
1
1
0.0
0.0
1
0.0 1
1
1 11 . ')
n.o 1
o.{» 1
97. *s
9 f. .40
1 1.090
ln.i)9'j
1
0.0
0.0
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
n.o 1
O.I) 1
12".-1
1 2 " . '*11
23.92(:
X 1
-0.084
-0.021
0.0 1
1
1 n.1)
0.0 I
1.0 1
1SJ.4S
is-.. r<
?->. /so
29.75D
X 1
-0.048
-0.015
0.0 1
1
1 n. 0
n. (1 1
0.0 1
1^2.10
191.77
J'i.«70
3b.S70
X 1
-0.175
-0.064
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
0.0 1
0 . i'i 1
223.26
223.^4
^»1 .*><0
41.rtMU
X 1
0.078
0.033
0.0 1
1
1 n.o
0.0 1
0.0 1
2C£-.OHi
?Si. ^
4 h . 1A 0
44.ISO
X 1
0.121
0.0S9
0.0 1
1
1 n.o
n.o l
.1.0 1
- o
S^+. Ooi)
S4.060
X 1
-0.099
-0.054
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
n.o 1
1.0 1
3W.OS
Tli. 1 1
60. 1!
X 1
-0.017
-0.013
0.0 1
1
1 11.11
0.0 l
O.il 1
^01.99
4< i'. 1 <
7s.^7o
76.2/0
X 1
0.035
0.027
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
n.o I
O.l! 1
3 2 4. 4 6
3E -+ . SS
7?.4So
72.{}Sii
X 1
0.024
0.017
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
. 0 1
". 0 1
. ?tj
2^.6 l
S-> . 33d
S4.1J0
X 1
0.1^8
0.082
0.0 1
1
1 0,0
0.0 1
o.O 1
1*0.19
1^'I.lM
^9.900
29. V 0<'
X 1
-0.008
-0.002
0.0 1
1
1 n.u
n.o l
0.1) 1
6U>. Ab
hi. I A
12.090
12.090
1
0.0
0.0
0.0 1
1
1 0.0
f.o I
1. 0 1
IS..'10
34 . ->6
s.400
h.40O
1
0.0
0.0
0.0 1
NONE IN>-
-------
#«•»» pPOOS^ff): 1 m0 07-11-77
>:> Vr« « »>:¦ »«»u
« »¦»
•*«« Af.My/'P CAL I skA [ IP'! r:l/Vt AMUrSIS »~*
<>»¦» ODD
FMO CAl[R AT TI F
CALTF«£TION OAT'-
T-ST ST TF NiitHK'
ft*S ANA! Y/Ff
fill l -SCAL* CONC
roNCFNT^Arion u tt
STAnnAHi) L AH RA; 'if
i>: o
n- o- 'I
h'l-Oi- A.IK"
K22.
HP''
1 ^
« VA L < ' '• Vc ¦ ¦¦•Vliv
I JST1 ; ¦<¦'*¦ f'T !A"F
K->a ' vo
c TK*i..i i.KaO
Ha^1 > ¦: ->t 1/ A -.''"lF
t IS A'i*-
i^i nr>
/¦ H! S^A'J TYPt
r-i^vK Fuut>-
OlOMFF fit
v- I(ii-U IfM¦» F-xCfOK
220* 7
EQUATIONS A ;n C ifFF T r I •- MTS
«»e«ae««a»«ee«»fe«a« -» »# ««¦»•»•
X = i
r
4 3 2
U5»X ~ A4«X ~ A3»X ~ A2»X ~ Al) = PPM PPOPANt/OZONE
C C C C
C AL IP - A TIOM =
A1 = 0.0
i.2 = 0.5411711F*ol
'3 = -0.1H2647-3E-02
<\4 = 0.0
as = n.o
C*LISd4IUtL
<>.
1.
2.
3.
A.
.
*.
7.
•
9.
10.
1
1--.
21.
27.
3p.
3/.
f.
4-.
5 «.
IAHi
0 T
"O I
*21
??l
*21
"11
I
t*o |
79|
1 <- I
5* I
031
__1
f 2—ii£L_3 LliLLn. L'iLt.
r_OFFl_rClIIJlJ.
11.
i ?.
'3.
'4.
1^.
I*.
i 7,
I ^ 4
14.
-"•n.
I
v * • "M i
ha . ^>H |
7o.04!
7< .Al I
n n . 7 * I
I
*"•*" .1/^1
¦n .a 7 i
9-...S2I
) I' •>. 1 M I
] ii7.SO |
_ I
? I .
2 <.
?¦-»
.
^V.
'¦I.
11'.
1)
}<'.
) 2' .
1
1 V*.
IA -.
I
1 J" .
I
*A I
171
SO I
-<3i
l-i
l
4 7 I
7 ' I
1 o I
-i '. |
n
n.
3?.
n.
14 .
**.
17.
H.
3
AO.
l**.l 1
1 71 ."<0
17*.Mi
1-1.' °
1-7.17
1^2.-=•
197.73
? 0 3 .' • 1
20rt.^u
213.US
" I .
<~ <.
.
<* .
A
">'] .
I
? 1 .->11 ^ 1.
??• .(i7 I -v.
2^ . 3 JI -j"*.
?3 -.V'l SA.
2 ' . 131 SS.
I
2A- . 0 7 I Sh.
?c .:i2l S7.
2S-.SSI SM.
2*" . 7s» I su.
2f'*->.02l *0»
i
It-YiJiUtiL.
2 7 1 .2 S
:> 7h.^7
2Hi.ev
2 "**.91
2^2.12
2*7.33
302.^3
307. 7 J
312.Mi
31H . 1J
nl .
h2.
*3.
">'+ .
*7.
hi.
70.
.J
OUAI.ITY COHTROL COM "FNTS
#»in)tnt»einnnnnt#i;-«»«j#innt
«»»««» CU"'VF NO I STOOtP ON (¦ ILI"
323.321 71.
326.SI I 72.
333.6v»l 73.
33t?.87l 7A.
3AA.0AI 75.
I
3A^.22I 7*.
3S301 95.
I
451.WOI 96.
«56.99 I 97.
"62.091 9e.
467.171 99.
472.261100.
J
I
477.34 I
482.42 t
487.4^I
492.5*I
497.63 I
I
502.691
507.75 I
512.81 I
517.8*1
522.91 I
1
*
-------
COLORADO ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION, D73.
P. 0. Box }kk
Boulder, Colorado 80302
Datet December 15, 1976
This is to certify that the instrumentation used in the
calibration of Merlam Laminar Flow Element
Model Mo. 50MC2-4SF Serial No. Y-72291R
is traceable to the Kational Bureau of Standards.
President ( Acting )
-------
16.
COLORADO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
OFFICE: LABORA-TORY:
P 0. Boi 344 P-0. Box 41
Boatdw, Cell. 53J0I f,'""'-
Phsne: 001—44J-1J44 J0J-W7-2J40
Date : December 15. 1976
This is to certify that the accuracy of the calibration
on Mertam Laminar Flow Element
Model No. 50MC2-4SF Serial No. Y-72291R
is Within plus or minus 0.4 percent of reading.
President ( Acting )
A Nonprofit Corporation of Colorado for Scicntttte and Educational Purpose*
Twting for the Public Saftfy
Proof pressure tests, Rowmotor collbcotiora, Get flow fojoo/ch spodaltstt
1°
-------
UJAl-'T ; ?~>7 -om
S~t£UE. Calou)£LC
Las. Te.cAf/v/icrA/si GEESX
prs *2-3 2.7-0/(f 3^-^1-11^0
Test Setup Fq^ LFe. Ca l./s.
Al4
sovKce.
TM^OTTUaXS.
VAcvS.
H£AT
£xcnAfi]&EA.
PkJUo CPV
/av .^w CrtiJ^nCtt-wvs."-
ywo-r*-
C***iw- LPa^z7g-
CPf ** 32-S" ~
CoPPL/L/
Cet&rtMM
P (ft-260 fsifi.)
P*1MA*Y V£NTtfftf
0.3S4-" D/A/h. TH««AT
tfCAT
EXCHAN
-------
COLORADO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
OFFICE;
P.O. 6o« 344
Boulder, Colo 80302
Phone: 303—443-1344
February 7, 1974
LABORATORY:
P. 0. Boi 41
Nann, Colo. 80643
Pboiw: 393—897-2)40
MKMO:
To our customers
ke: Shipping Methods, in order of preference
1. United Parcel Service ( where available)
Address: Colorado Engineering Experiment Station
Missile Site
Nunn, Colorado
Limitations: 100 lb. per day-
Insurance: $5,000.00 max.
Receipt is provided
2. U. S. Postal Service (parcel post)
Address: Colorado Engineering Experiment Station
P. o. lJox 41
Nunn, Colorado J0643
Limitations: 70 lb.
Length & Girth - 100" max.
Insurance: $200.00 max.
Uecclpt is provided if insured. If not insured, a
Certificate of Mailing costs 5 cents.
3. lius Package Express
address: Colorado Engineering Experiment Station
Fort Collins, Colorado
On arrival phone: 434-9365
Limitations: 100 lb. / package
5 packages / shipment
Length & Width & Height 2 141" max.
Height = 60" max.
Insurance: $250.00 max.
lleceipt is provided.
A Nonprofit Corporotion of Colorado for Scientific and Educational Purposes
Testing for the Public Safety
Proof pr«uure tests. Flowmeter calibrations, Gas flow research specialists
7
-------
/£.
MEMO: To our customers
February 7, 1
-------
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
1FFICE:
. 0. Box 344
. u.'der, Colo. 80302
. ,onc: 303—143-1344
LABORATORY:
P. 0. Box 41
Nunn, Colo. 80648
Phone: 303—S97-2340
: L. I BRAT I ON 0F A MERIAM LAMINAR FL0W ELEMENT
t-. J EL: 50MC2-8F S/N: F62502TR EPA TAG: 092015 ..
f 3: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ORDER: CD-7-20876-A;
i; TA FILE: EPA5 DATE: 18 AUGUST 1977
! _ET DIA: 6 INCHES THROAT DIA: 12 INCHES
. 5T GAS: AIR STD DENS ITY= 0.074916 LBM/CU-FT
XT STANDARD CONDITIONS OF 529.69 DEG R, AND 14.696 PSIA
f; "F: DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE IN INCHES OF WATER AT 68 DEG F
P "M: ACTUAL CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE
I- ."ACTOR: ACFM+VISCOSITY/DIFF.
t\ ; i0: INLET(PIPE) REYNOLDS NUMBER
S TM: STANDARD CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE
K :SS: PRESSURE AT INLET TAP IN PSIA
"i IP: INLET TEMPERATURE IN DEGREES RANXINE
L DIFF ACFM K FACTOR REY N0 SCFM PRESS TEMP
J
7 .625
2017.63
2.7072
E-4
519658
2006.61
14.701
532.79
•¦)
7.814
2064.82
2.6961
E-4
535063
2060.40
14.698
530.89
1
7.633
2019.37
2.7059
E-4
520135
2007.87
14.692
532.59
7 .444
1973.03
2.7107
E-4
508556
1 962.88
14.698
532.49
5
6.958
1849.40
2.7148
E-4
477947
1842.33
1 4.692
531.59
j
6.209
1655.89
2.7277
E-4
426565
1646.66
14.694
532.59
7
5.399
1443.24
2.7336
E-4
372000
1435.82
14.698
532.49
3
6.179
1649.66
2.7231
E-4
427611
1646.15
14.692
530.69
;
A. S73
1231.25
2.7520
E-4
317599
1225.31
14.694
5[32 . 1 9
t J
3.814
1029.03
2.7608
E-4
264819
1022.72
14.694
532.89
:¦ i
3.046
825.56
2.7729
E-4
212598
820.81
14.694
532.69
) 3
3.800
1027.02
2.7639
E-4
264652
1021.48
14.694
532.49
: 3
2.27 4
616.41
2.7724
E-4
158716
612.78
14.692
532.69
1 4
1.512
409.31
2.7704
E-4
105334
406.79
14.694
532.89
; 3
1 .374
372.54
2.7756
E-4
95690
369.82
14.691
533.39
1 5
1 . 1 48
312.93
2.7863
E-4
80667
311.31
14.694
532.39
1 7
0.933
254.29
2.7852
E-4
65624
253.15
14.696
532.09
1 3
0.7 19
196.08 .
2.7856
E-4
50600
195.16
14.691
531.99
1 9
0.934
254.24
2.7820
E-4
65637
253.12
14.692
531.89
AVERAGE VALUES FOR ABOVE RESULTS:
P = 14.694 PSIA DENS ITY= 0.07454 LBM/CU-FT
T- 532.3 DEG R VISCOSITY= 1.0224E-6 LBM/INCH-SEC
Z- 0.99965 COMPRESSIBILITY FACTOR
A Nonprofit Corporation of Colorado for Scientific and Educational Purposes
1
Testing for the Public Safety
^if
Proof pressure tests. Flowmeter calibrations. Gas flow research specialists
/j-PPSjoi,;* 5" N&1
-------
COJLOK/ULJO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATIOiN
INC
OFFICE:
.0 Box 344
3u I dpi, Colo. B03C2
none: 303—-WM3.H
LABORATORY:
P.O. Bo* 41
frfiMn, Colo. SO443
Phors: iOi—M7-2340
JOEL: 50MC2-8F
TA FILE: EPA5
S/N: F62502TR EPA TAG: 092015
DATS: 18 AUGUST 197 7
POINTS EXCLUDED FROM AVERAGES. KCAV£>= 2-7488E-4 ZDEV FR0M»KCAVE>J
.<0> R/1000 MTR R&AD LCO) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 + 42
086420864S0864206642024680246802463024680
18 50.59 0.71933 . 0./.
17 65.62 0.93317 19 * SO*
16 60.66 1. 1484 .i .0 .
1 5 95. 68 j. 3744 ....0.
14 105.33 1 .51 18 i...b
13 158.71 2.2744 * . /. 0
U 212.59 3.0456 . . . . U'. . 0
12 2 64.6 5 3.8 10 .30
9 317.59 4.5734 y. 10
7 372" 5.3993 . , . . i
6 426 .56 6.2091 8 . 00.... .
5 477.94 6.9575 0".. . . .
4 508.55 7.4436 1 .......00 4
3 520. 13 7.633 2 fi.O i
/
¦ALE,? 4
: 5.06 E+4 R 2.12 E + 5 K= 2.77965 E-4 K/K(AVE>- 1.01124
D DEV = 0.67 £-6 Z STD DEV= 0.242 BASED 0N 7 DATA PTS
X DEV= -.93 E-6 % MAX DEV=-0.334 AT L=14 CHAl)V/s 2.35
>: 2.12 E+5 R 3.74 E+5 K= 2.75666 E-4 K/K= 1.00287
0 DEV = 0.15 E-5 % STD DEV= 0.540 BASEO ON 5 DATA PTS
< DEV = -.23 E-5 Z MAX UEV=-0.836 AT L~ 7 CHAUV= 1.222
; 3.74- E + 5 R 5.35 E + 5 K= P.. 71224 E-4 K/Ktk Safety '
Piccf prcsvuro rcsis, Flawmoicr caljbrJfioni. Goi flow rojcaich specialists
-------
iu'VU O
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
OFFICE:
;. 0. Box 344
ouldcr, Colo. E0302
"Sore: 303—443-1344
LABORATORY:
P. 0. Box 41
Nunn, Colo. 80648
Phone: 303-397-2340
TA? EPA50UT
MBEft OF POINTS? 19
:AN VALUE OF X = 287868.
XAN VALUE 0F Y = 2.74875E-4
3TD ERROR OF Y = 3.17808E-6
r "LYFIT OF DEGREE 2 INDEX OF DETERM = 0.983963 WHAT NEXT? 2
7-.3M COEFFICIENT
2.73637E-4
- A. 29867E-
1 2
-2.21441E-
17
ACTUAL
Y-ACTUAL
Y-CALC
DIFF
PCT-DII
.•9658
2.707225>4
2.70424E-4
2.98425E-7
0. \ \
:35060
2.6961E-A
2.69998E-4
-3.87 643E-7
-0.144
i >0140
2.7059E-A
2.7041E-4
1.7 9595E-7
0. 066
5J8560
2.7 1 07E-A
2.70724E-4
3.46026E-7
0. 128
¦'¦'7 950
2.7148E-A
2.7 1524E-4
-4.42407E-S
-0.016
• 2657 0
2.7277E-4
2.72774E-4
-4.23702E-9
-0.002
:;2000
2.7336E-4
2.73974E-4
-6.13808E-7
-0.224
- ,?7610
2.7231E-4
2.7275E-4
-4•40094E-7
-0.161
:¦ 17 600.
.2.752E-4
2.75038E-4
1.6I621E-7
0.059
.-..4320
2•7 608E-A
2.75946E-4
1.34028E-7
0. 049
: 2600
2.7729E-A
2.76723E-4
5.67479E-7
0.205
'c.'. £> 4 6 50
2.7639E-4
2.75949E-4
4.41304E-7
0. 16
1 j8720
2.7724E-4
2.77397E-4
-1.57 166E-7
-0.057
iJ5330
2.7704E-4
• 2.77 939E-4
-8.98853E-7
-0.323
°';690
2.7756E-4
2.78023E-4
-4.63202E-7
-0.167
c.^667
2.7 863E-4
2.78146E-4
4.83548E-7
0. 174
t, ' 624
2.7852Z-A
2.7826E-4
2.60155E-7
0. 093
5'.'600
2.7856E-4
2.78363E-4
1.96902E-7
0.07 1
-o637
2.782E-4
2.7826E-4
-5.97522E-8
-0.021
S~ .) ERROR QF ESTIMATE FOR Y = 0.00153207
A Nonprofit Corporation cf Colorado fcr Scientific end Edueotionol Purpoici
Testing for the Public Safety
Proof prcssuro tests, Flowmeter calibrations, Goi flow research specialists
7
-------
e.C'JUOA'LrUJO
ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION
INC.
LAMINAR ELEMENT FLOW TABLE
Mf'UEL: bOMC2-8F S/N: F62b02TR EPA TAG: 092015
r 3 k : U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OkDER: CD-7-20876
C LI BRAT I ON DATA FILE: EPAb DATE: 18 AUGUST 1977
K FACTORS BASED ON LEAST-SQUARES FIT TO CALIBRATION DATA
FLOWRATES COrRECIED TO \ 4.696 PSIA AND 70 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
DIFF: DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE IN INCHES OF WATER AT 68 DEG F
Al>'M: FLOWkATE IN ACTUAL CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE
K FACTOR: ACFM*VISCOSITY/DIFF
HEY NO: INLET (PIPE) REYNOLDS NUMBER
SL'FM: FLOWKATE IN STANDARD CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE
Si ABOARD CONDITIONS: 14.696 PSIA AND 70 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
DIFF ACFM K FACTOR REY NO SCFM
C. 7 50
204.96
2.7834
E-4
53320
204.96
1 . COO
273.16
2.7822
E-4
7 1 061
273.16
! .25 0
34 1.25
2.7808
E-4
887 b 1
34 1.28
1 . j00
409•32
2.77 93
E-4
1 06479
409.31
1.7^0
All.2b
2.7776
E-4
1 2 4 1 b 1
47 7.24
2 . 000
b 4b.07
2.7 7 bS
E-4
1 4179b
545.07
2. 2b0
6 12.78
2.7739
E-4
1 b9408
6 12.73
2.500
680.36
2.77 18
E-4
176988
680.35
2,7dO
747.80
2.7696
E-4
194b33
747.80
3 . 000
81 b. 10
2.7673
E-4
212039
815.09
3 . 2d0
882.24
2.7 6 48
E-4
229^04
882.23
3.^00
949-22
2.7623
E-4
246926
9 49.21
3.7 bO
1 01.6.02
2.7b9=>
E-4
264303
1016.01
4 . 000
'1 082. 64
2.7 b 67
E-4
281633
1082.63
•i -• IJjO
1149.07
2.7,b37
E-4
298912
1149.Ub
-i • ^00
121b.29
2.7 b06
E-4
316140
1215.28
¦4.7^0
1281.31
2.7474
E-4
3333 1 3
1281.30
o. 000
13^7.12
2.744 1
E-4
350429
1347.10
o. 2b0
14 12.70
2.7 407
E-4
367^87
1412.68
b . dOO
147 8•Ob
2.7371
E-4
384500
1478.03
b . 7 b 0
1b43 . 1 b
2.7334
E-4
401437
15 43.14
6. 000
1608.02
2.7296
E-4
41831 1
1608.00
6. 2b0
1672.62
2.72b7
E-4
43b 1 18
1672.61
6. bOO
1736.97
2.7217
E-4
4b18b8
1736.9b
6. 7 50
1801.Ob
2.7176
E-4
468b28
1801.03
7 . 000
1864.86
2.7134
E-4
48b127
18 64.84
7 . 2b0
1928.38
2.7091
E-4
b016b3
1928.36
7 . mOO
"1991 .62
2.7047
E-4
b18104
1991.60
7 . 7 b 0
20b 4.b7
2.7001
E-4
534480
20b 4.b b
o. )00
2117.22
2.69bb
E-4
b 507 7 8
2117 .20
A Nonprofit Corporation of Colorado for Scientific end Educctionai Purposes
Testing for the Public Sofery
Pioof pressure tests, Flowmeter cohbrarians, Gcs flow research specialists
-------
DYNAMOMETER SYSTEM
QC CHECK
TECHNIQUE
FREQUENCY
1. Driving Aid Calibration Roll Revolution Count 30 Days
2. Tachometer Calibration Digital Counter
BiMonthly
3. Driving Aid Check
Roll Revolution Count Daily
U. Frictional HP-Road
Load HP Check
Coastdovm
Weekly
APPENDIX 6a
-xj
CO
ACCURACY
* 0.1 mph
t 10 rpm
1 0.1*
1 0.5 HP
BRUCE GARDNER, FORD
-------
1.
QUICK COASTDOWNS
AFTER COMPLETE DYNAMOMETER CALIBRATION AND COASTDOWNS
DATE IND HP @ 50 TIME ABSORBED HP
2-9-75 9.8 HP 13.8 sec 19.80 HP
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
2-10-75 9.8 13.4 20.39
13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
2-11-75 9.9 13-6 20.09
13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
2-12-75 9.8 13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
2-13-76 9.8 13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
APPENDIX 6b F. JOHNSON, CHRYSLER
1)
-------
2.
QUICK COASTDOWNS
CAR #2 58 ROLLS #27
COASTDOWN"WITH VEHICLE ON ROLLS AFTER TEN MINUTE WARM-UP
4500 LB., AUTO ROAD LOAD
DATE IND HP @ 50 TIME ABSORBED HP
2-2-75 9.8 13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
2-3.-75 9.8 13 .8 19. 80
13.8 19.80
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
14.0 19.52
2-4-75 9.8 13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
2-5-75 9.9 13.2 20.70
13.4 20.39
13.4 20:39
13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.6 20.09
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
2-6-75 10.0 13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
13.8 19.80
APPENDIX 6b F. JOHNSON, CHRYSLER
£0
-------
DYNAMOMETER SYSTEM
Gt»en>./
• in Tie Mtk.ft'c A7ct/fer/zeJi Le*.st S^vares Cuvve FiT
• Cot^^oTt^ Prol forw Cil*Co fc cv CC
CJ-i Hi tiojJ_
• Z^I-lVei-'S $id[ JLiuen+ity CUkt
• Foil Dyna.»*ttfi*fek SpteJl #.*jJ klcrsepou)e* VeirifiCQ.t>\>»> -3Od*>yi
' CActks 0e-Fovt Tesi"
• 1 hO Pw/sc/hev. Op tie*.! E »C0 Jetr
• Com putt*- /)a. to. flcgoitifiorf 7est***f
• /&4.ckmoja fit*phy fie WcCS
' Live - SyA/c hroHizeJi STVo ^ © Scape Speed Ce^lib pa."//**?
• C0A.stJU««u< \/elv»clt
T.L.S- /o/f/77
G.n. P. 6.
g> j
-------
PV U M OM/TO^/MG-
/) I WJ EN6AGEMEMT - M ICR.O SCO/TCH
D E-C ODE (2- /A
B. SPEED (R«) Tomus:
C. HP Readout f TEETH) USED TO T(2.I6GE£. Hp.
D. two Roll r.e\js cooMrE&s.
50
r
l)0A> tyHi LS&.1-
-------
_ ^ ^ isr- ^
ROLL REVS DATA
N-?I2_ ^ si'&ma ^S%cl. Miles
I fi3/K=r 1- S'fO?. 77.7 |.??„ 3-605? .*/-
j BA £> 2. <=1116. 10*5.5 2.3% 3.1010 /./
l.BARi
-------
HC
EMISSION LEVEL
GRAMS/MILE 1.40
MAXIMUM PERCENT
VARIATION 5.
HC
EMISSION LEVEL
GRAMS/MILE 0.5
MAXIMUM PERCENT
VARIATION
10. OX
VEHICLE CROSS CHECK LIMITS
CO NOx CO
8.5 3.3 600
10.0% 8.0% 3.0%
CO NOx C02
4.0 2.3 670
15.0% 10.0% 3.0%
APPENDIX
-------
ETLPLANKTION OF TERMS USED IN CROSS CHECK SUMMARY
MEAN". SUM OF DATA ENTRIES DIVIDED BY THE NUMBER OF
ENTRIES GWES PNERAGE VALUE OF DATA
STANDARD DEVIATION: GIVES THE PNERAGE TllFFERENCE. BETWEEN
THE INDIVIDUAL DATA ENTR^S AND THE K\EAN.
COMPUTED BY SUBTRACTING A "DATA ENTRY FROM THE
MEAN AUD SQUARING THE DIFFERENCE.THE SQUARED
TERMS ARE ADDED TOBETHER. AND THAT TOTAL IS DIN11DED
BY THE NUMBER OF ENTRIES MINUS OHE.THE SQUARE
ROOT OF THAT ANSWER IS THE S.D.
VARIANCE'. IS THE SQUARE OF THE STANDARD DEVIATION
PRECISION ()N PCX): IS A NORMALIZED VALUE OF THE STANDARD
DEVIATION. IT ALLOWS YOU TO COMPARE THE SPREAD OF A
SMALL NUMBER TO THE SPREAD OF A LftRGE NUMBER IN
A MEANINGFUL WAY.
COMPUTED BY DIVIDING THE STANDARD DEVIATION BY THE
WEAN. IN THIS CASE PRECISION IS GNEN IN PER CENT SD
THE ANSWER. IS MULTtPL\ED BY 100.
W\EAN*^i-aT
APPENDIX 7a
85
l-Z.9-1 Co
-------
CVS AMD ANALYTICAL UNITS CROSS CHECK
HIGHLAND PARK BMQIHEERIHQ
DEPARTMENT 5140
BH1MI9H PWWWVm tbstiw
DATE* UK of 9/19/77
VEHICLE TIMDl 313, 160 CIO, V AUTO. HAM*,
rur IMKTIAl 4000# V AC FACTO*
TUT TYMl HOT 405 H PLYING STAKT
BUIimi A. B. MOMMA
MODAL TEST KMULW
(in graM/allt)
MRHOO or
ANALYSIS
amjjt NUMBER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
i
HYDROCARBONS
r.i.o.
DOME .
.1*3
.947
.830
.831
.784
.817
.947
.973
.891
.885
.902
.896
1.037
1.003
1
rftTBfT
E.D.I.R.
S.82
3.82
3.72
3.38
3.73
3.66
3.72
3.70
3.79
3.76
4.11
4.10
3.66
3.60
•
1
1
DIOXIDE
M.D.I.R.
733
734
726
733
752
744
730
731
749
740
776
770
746
737
1
OXIDES Or NXTMXMBI
CRM*
.931
.941
.873
.874
.976
.919
.868
.876
.944
.874
1.016
.997
.966
.936
PUBL ECONOMY
rtmnrm imjmci
11.93
11.63
12.08
11.97
11.67
11.80
12.01
12.00
11.71
11.85
11.30
11.39
11.73
11.90
DISTANCE
WfTIAI -»W MTIfl
BOW
3.376
3.379
3.362
3.364
3.372
3.373
3.374
3.575
3.567
3.561
3.543
3.543
3.564
3.564
OOMWni (1) BOLLS » MMiviUkU Am U 4jmm mlMk&M.
APPENDIX 7a CHRYSLER
-------
CVS AMD ANALYTICAL UNITS CROSS CHECK
HIGHLAND PARK ENQINEBRINQ
DEPARTMENT 5140
EMISSION DEVELOPMENT TESTING
lllint VEIK of 9/19/77
VniCLk TESTED! 315, 360 CIO V AUTO TVAMS.
tiff INERTIA t 4000# V AC FACTOt
COMPCMMT ANALYSER (g/al)
MEAN
VARIANCE
a, STD. DEV.
REPEATABILITY
MEAN-2S
MEAN+2S
HYDROCARBONS
MODAL
.904
.006
.076
* 8.43*
.752
1.057
BAG
.688
•002
.039
~ 3.691
.609
.766
CARBON MONOXIDE
MODAL
3.771
.023
.139
4.221
3.452
4.089
BAO
3.740
.017
.129
3.441
3.482
3.998
CARBON DIOXIDE
MODAL
744.3
218.9
14.8
1.991
714.9
774.1
BM
733.8
139.7
11.8
1.611
712.2
759.4
OXIDES Or MlfROQEN
MODAL
.928
.002
.049
3.331
.829
1.027
BAO
1.264
.006
.079
6.281
1.106
1.423
FUEL ECONOMY
MODAL
11.79
.03
.23
1.961
11.32
12.25
BAO
11.93
•04
.19
1.381
11.56
12.31
DISTANCE
3.366
•000
.011
0.321
3.343
3.588
OOIMNVSHI) l«pMt«blilty for both bag tad nodal nwlti tr« within fch* llalu Mt forth In thi Chryiltr
pirfoiMaoi standard No.FF-6168 procadnra Bo* LP 461 E 123, aicapt nodal and bat K.
(2) Aatarlak danotaa oot of id»c.
oo
-o
APPENDIX 7a
CHRYSLER
-------
cvs ***** /^Lyric.^ umtts moss check
prflK Er^3itn:snrt^«
i: r'ivrr^Tr 5140
prrssiai devglopmsht tsstibs
DATS: HI of t/lt/77
VE3ICLB TSSTfDi 315, 160 CIO* V ADTO. HAM.
TSST INERTIA l 4O00# V AC VACT08
TEST TYPBl ®T Sb5 W FUUB ft AIT
ilMSKB: *• K. MOUIA
HQ TOT KE3QLT3
COMPONENT ANALYZED
(in gr«M/ail«)
termoo or
ANALYSIS
BOLLS NUMBER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 ] 27
r.i.D.
doun .
.703
.737
.634
.628
.646
.652
.712
.711
.690
.718
.681
.656
.705
.754
CABBON NOMOXIDS
X.C.I.B.
3.84
3.78
3.80
3.62
3.70
3.61
3.60
3.77
3.61
3.65
3.93
4.03
3.72
3.70
CAMBfm DIOXIDE
N.D.I.B.
743.5
743.1
722.5 .
730.1
726.4
726.9
726.2
731.8
735.5
731.2
762.0
757.4
735.5
729.2
oxides or nitrogen
CUBN.
1.353
1.398
1.180
1.172
1.301
1.233
1.190
1.212
1.219
1.149
1.318
1.313
1.345
1.318
FUEL ECONOMY
fAPBON IPiT HlfTS
11.81
11.81
12.15
12.03
12.09
12.08
12.09
11.99
11.94
12.01
11.52
11.59
11.94
12.04
MOOAL-BA0 RATIO
MUM
OQMMCHT9X (1) ««!< 20 UHAVAILABLX DUE TO DTK) EVALUATION
APPENDIX 7a CHRYSLER
-------
pJS A*?D ANALYTICAL UNITS C^CSSCnSCK
CHELSEA PROVING G" PUMPS
DISPART-?*:? 5150
VEHICLE CERTIFICATION
DATE i
VEHICLE TESTED
TEST INERTIA
TEST TYPE
EUSIKESR
September 26 and 27, 1977
655 (318 automatic w/catalyst)
4000*
Hot 505 v/flying start
T. Kueny
BAG DATA
COMPONENT ANALYZED .
(in arams/mile)
METHOD OF
ANALYSIS
ROT.TS N
UM3ER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 I fl
HYDROCARBONS
F.I.D.
.272
.300
.290
.334
.309
.285
.288
i
.317
CARBON MONOXIDE
N.D.I.R.
3.06
3.84
4.03
4.35
3.65
3.11
4.02
4.54
CARBON DIOXIDE
N.D.I.R.
5S4
559
550
561
553
558
559
563
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CHEM.
1.76
1.84
1.79
1.95
1.79
1.89
1.90
2.01
FUEL ECONOMY
CARBON BALANCE
15.85
15.68
15.93
15.61
15.86
15.75
1
I
15.68 jl5.55
DISTANCE
DIGITAL COUNTER
3.58
3.56
3.60
3.60
3.58
3.59
3.60
3.59
COMMENTS: 1) All tests were driven by the same person.
2) Cells 1 and 5 were tested on September 27; all other rolls were tested September 26
3) Chrysler Laboratory Procedure LP-461K-123 was followed with the exception that
single tests were obtained from each cell instead of the prescribed duplicates.
APPENDIX 7a
CHRYSLER
-------
CVS AND ANALYTICAL UNITS CROSSCHECK
CHELSEA PROVING GROUNDS
DEPARTMENT 5150
VEHICLE CERTIFICATION
DATS t
VEHICLE TEST!Dt
TEST XNERTXA l
TEST TYPE s
ENGINEER s
8«ptaab«v 26# 1977
855 (319 sutonatic w/catalyst)
4000*
Hot 505 w/flyiag start
T. Kueny
MODAL DATA
COMPONENT ANALYZED
(in arams/mlle)
METHOD OP
ANALYSIS
ROLLS N
rtJM3ER
1
2
3
4
5
6
i
8
HYDROCARBONS
r.i.D.
.283
.410
.332
.329
.338
.296
.300
.327
CARSON MONOXIDE
N.D.X.R.
2.14
2.48
2.74
2.81
2.49
2.22
2.66
3.29
CARBON DIOXIDE
N.D.Z.R.
S«4
»«7
563
566
567
561
564
569
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
CHEM.
1.65
1.75
1.74
1.90
1.76
1.86
1.86
2.02
FUEL ECONOMY
CARBON SAIANCE
15.61
15.50
15.61
15.53
15.51
15.68
15.59
15.43
EXHAUST VOLUME
MODAL-BAO RATIO
324
317
316
336
319
311
317
341
COMMENTS: i) Modal hydrocarbons from rolls 2 are excessively high with respect to both other
rolls and to bag results. Analyzer shift is suspected but the overall system
will be investigated.
2) Both exhaust volume and CO, data are high for the second consecutive week on
rolls «4.
APPENDIX 7a
CHRYSLER
-------
OVS KTD *Tmr,YTTCAT, CttTTS CROSS CHECK
HIGHL.V7D PAPJg EMGIKEERIKG
DEPARTMENT 5150
EMISSION DEVELOPMENT TESTING
DATE: September 26, 1977
VSrilCIJS TESTED: 855 (318 automatic w/catalyst)
TEST ISERTIA: 4000*
COMPONENT ANALYZER(g/mi.)
MEAN
VARIANCE
S, SID.' DEV.
REPEATABILITY*
MEAN-2S
M£A*J+2S
HYDROCARBONS
MODAL
3 A3
.327
.299
.0015
.0004
.039
.020
11.9
6.7
.249
.260
.405
.339
CARBON MONOXIDE
MODAL
BAG
2.60
3.83
.132
.285
.36
.53
14.0
14.0
1.88
2.76
3. 33
4.89
CARBON DIOXIDE
MODAL
BAG
565
557
6.70
19.3
2.6
4.4
.5
.8
560
548
570
566
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
MODAL
BAG
1.82
1.87
.0133
.0076
.115
.087
6.4
4.7
1.59
1.69
2.05
2.04
FUEL ECONOMY
MODAL
BAG
15.56
15.74
.01
.02
.08
.13
.5
.8
15.40
15.47
15.72
16.00
EXHAUST VOLUME
MODAL
CALC. j
323
111
10.5
3.3
302
344
COMMENTS: According to Chrysler Performance Standard PP-6168, maximum allowable percent
variation for a vehicle omitting at these levels is 10% HC, 15% CO, 10% NO and
3% C0~. Only modal hydrocarbons exceed this limit and is denoted with an x
asterisk.
2) Modal-bag agreement foe COj# NO and fuel economy is excellent; agreement for HC
and CO is poor but is influenced by the low emissions levels measured.
APPENDT X 7a CHRYSLER
-------
Correlations v^hicz_e_s £(,at'1
f\. Both swalu ArJb large, are:
D&stfcABt-E-.
B. Se.t schedule: Foe. sites Anid
develop A B^sel./aje_.
C. Mojito*, coast Do torsi At's Afte^
TE5T.
IX Plot £>AtA AM"D Do statistics
for. oaje. MofiJTrt P£#.tod (^9 resit)
( EXAMP^E. 2.TESTS /DA7 * 2o PAYS -r gsiras - 5/4 /
x ~7& jy>A, £W
r°
-------
DB WB H Kh % ^
74 64 75.2 1.001 0
73 63 72.0 .986 -1.5
72 62 68.9 .972 -2.9
71 61 65.9 .959 -4.2
BARO = 29.0"
EFFECT OF ERROR IN TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
FOR SAME T"
APPENDIX 8
DICK LAWRENCE
-------
QC CHECK
1. SHED Volume
2. SHED Background
3* SHED Leakage
SHED SYSTEM
TECHNIQUE
Propane Injection
k Hour Check
Propane Injection
_0
APPENDIX 9a
FREQUENCY
At Introduction
Yearly
Monthly
BRUCE GARDNER, FORD
ACCURACY
t 2%
.k gm max
h% in ¥ hours
-------
SHED SYSTLM
C e»€r* |
M-VEL Des^eA
• E. WcloffcMre
• Console
!
• Co' stein
E. fjclosvtt
GoiUotive Style Doo\r.
Piotft/Poov- Sea.!
TV>o - 420 cfri £eA/7>/f(/fft/ Ql»u)€\rS
McJli*y»n **>4 H i
"Pro* "Tyf. -3y Ctt/fraliev.
CO SylfgK
•I. A>tcr*»*l/y Mouw.Ted Coo 1 i«j^ S^ste*
Cl.se*-L OOp Servo Con tilled
V/*tcr - to- V/scfer Hc*i" E *c h*. *>|7 7
-------
EPA 21-1
XN-PRocess QC Techmisubs_
f\. Calibration (S>as Mon(To/z/*)&-
B. DVU HofLSEPovEjz. check op ^RLC
C. Test DAtA Rat»os a^d uftns
~~ VM/X 2// />ND 1/3
CO 2- ®A€> VtoTML. G(V\S
— BK
------- |