IMMEDIATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
INTERSTATE STREAMS
DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE
United States Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Northeast Region
Boston, Mass.
APRIL 1967
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF TABLES 1
LIST OF FIGURES 1
I. INTRODUCTION 2
II. SUMMARY OF IMMEDIATE NEEDS 4
A. Delaware Estuary 5
B. Delaware Bay 21
C. Upper Delaware River 22
D. State of Delaware Not in the Delaware River
Basin 27
III. IMMEDIATE NEEDS 28
A. Delaware Estuary 28
B. Delaware Bay 30
C. Upper Delaware River 33
D. State of Delaware Not in the Delaware River
Basin 36
IV. COST 37
V. RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL 39
VI. BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS 41
A. Delaware Estuary 41
B. Delaware Bay 45
C. Upper Deliaware River 46
D. State of Delaware Not in the Delaware River
Basin 49
APPENDIX A
Municipal and Industrial Water Use and Waste
Water Inventory - Delaware Estuary
i
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. PAGE
I Costs of Immediate Needs 38
II Average Water Quality - Delaware River 44
III Summary of Flows - Delaware River 47
IV Frequency of Occurrence of 7- and
30- Day Low Flows - Delaware River 47
V Water Quality - Delaware River -
Section 2 48
LIST OF FIGURES
FIG. NO.
1 Location Map of Interstate Streams
in the Delaware Basin and the State
of Delaware
1
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This report focuses on the immediate needs to enhance and pre-
serve the water quality of the interstate streams in the Delaware
River Basin and in the State of Delaware (see figure 1). It directs
attention to specific known sources of pollution which must be
abated through programming actions within the next five years.
The report has been subdivided into four areas of concern:
(A) The Delaware Estuary, (B) The Delaware Bay, (C) The Upper
Delaware, and (D) The Interstate Streams in the State of Delaware
not in the Delaware River Basin. The information contained herein
has been compiled from the preliminary results of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Administration's (FWPCA) Delaware Estuary
Comprehensive Study (DECS), inventories and reports of the Delaware
River Basin Commission (DRBC), and from reports by the State Health
Departments of New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York. Field
surveys and detailed engineering studies have been performed by
the FWPCA only in the preparation of the estuary portion of this
report.
The listing of priorities for immediate needs are relative to
the Delaware River Basin and do not apply or relate to any other
priority system in the Northeast Region or in the country. Also,
the omission of any town, industry, or other establishment from
2
-------
II. SUMMARY OF IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
The priority for action in the report is based on quantitative
analyses of the effectiveness per dollar of meeting the dissolved
oxygen goals and/or on qualitative assessment of urgency.
"A" Priority is assigned to water quality controls
absolutely required to meet and maintain the minimum
desired water quality goals. (Note that because of
the magnitude of these "A" Priority controls and
their costs for the estuary, a sub-priority is assigned
to the dischargers and listed in order of decreasing
importance. This is done to give guidance to regulatory
agencies, enforcement branches, and the grants programs
concerning the order in which to allocate resources)
"B" Priority is assigned to controls that are
1) located within a regional problem area, 2) have
a relatively small effect on the total environment,
and 3) are necessary because present controls are
below adequate levels established by state and inter-
state agencies.
"C" Priority is assigned to controls of. known dis-
charges which cause local nuisance conditions in
streams of generally high quality and/or are in violation
of effluent requirements of state and interstate
agencies.
4
-------
A. Delaware Estuary
The basis for concern in the estuary is the restriction
or complete elimination of some legitimate and desired water uses.
For example:
(1) Water contact recreation is not officially
condoned because of extreme bacterial con-
tamination.
(2) Aquatic life is suppressed because of dis-
solved oxygen depletion, acid conditions,
and discharge of toxic substances.
(3) Recreational boating is restricted because
of the hazards of floating debris and poor
aesthetic appearance caused partly by raw
sewage discharged during stormwater overflow
of combined sewers.
(4) Intrusion of salt water, from the bay, while
not caused by pollutional discharges, imposes
limitations and economic losses on municipal
and industrial water users.
Listed below are the immediate controls needed to enhance the
estuary's water quality and to maintain the desired water use
and water quality objectives to the period 1975 - 1980.
5
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility j Cost
Municipality Treatment Capital Total2 Priority
County - State
Need
$
$
City of Burlington
Burlington - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 55% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
111,000
236,000
A-l
City of Philadelphia
(Northeast Plant)
Philadelphia - Pa.
Increase UOD
from 75% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
1,387,000
6,646,000
A-2
City of Philadelphia
(Southwest Plant)
Philadelphia - Pa.
Increase UOD
from 40% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
22,132,000
35,925,000
A-3
City of Salem
Salem - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 40% to
removal
85%
89,000
189,000
A-4
City of Camden
(Main Plant)
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 30% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
4,434,000
5,497,000
A-5
Pennsville Township
Salem - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 40% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
87,000
187,000
A-6
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs @ 3% over 20 years
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility ^ Cost
Municipality Treatment Capital Total Priority
County - State
Need
$
$
City of Penns Grove
Salem - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 40% to
removal
85%
86,000
179,000
A-7
Pennsauken 5 Merchantville
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 75% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
122,000
289,000
A-8
Marcus Hook Boro
Delaware - Pa.
Increase UOD
from 35% to
removal
85%
80,000
150,000
A-9
City of Wilmington
New Castle - Delaware
Increase UOD
from 20% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
9,938,000
13,301,000
A-10
City of Woodbury
Gloucester - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 40% to
removal
85%
120,000
212,000
A-11
Tinicum Township
Delaware - Pa.
Increase UOD
from 30% to
removal
85%
110,000
187,000
A-12
City of Paulsboro
Gloucester - New Jersey
Increase UOD
from 30% to
Disinfection
removal
85%
of effluent
107,000
205,000
A-13
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs @ 3% over 20 years.
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility
Municipality
County - State
Treatment
Need
Cost
Capital Total'
$ $
Priority
City of Philadelphia
(Southeast Plant)
Philadelphia - Pa.
City of Gloucester
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
Increase UOD removal
from 70% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
24,238,000 39,948,000
22,000
339,000
A-14
A-15
Oo
City of Chester
Delaware - Pa.
Central Delaware County
Sewer Authority
Delaware - Pa.
Increase UOD removal 1,554,000 2,259,000
from 30% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
Increase UOD removal 4,033,000 4,791,000
from 35% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
A-16
A-17
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs @ 3% over 20 years.
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility
Municipality
County - State
Treatment
Need
Priority
Lower Bucks County Joint
Municipal Authority
Levittown - Bucks - Pa.
Disinfection of effluent
vo
Hamilton Township
Mercer - New Jersey
Riverside Township
Burlington - New Jersey
Delran Township
Burlington - New Jersey
Disinfection of effluent
Disinfection of effluent
Increase UOD removal
from 65% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
Palmyra Boro
Burlington - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 65% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
Cinnaminson Township
Burlington - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 50% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
City of Camden
(North Plant)
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 70% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Typ©: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility
Municipality Treatment1 Priority
County - State Need
City of Delaware
New Castle - Delaware
Increase UOD removal
from 40% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
B
Haddon Township (Westmont)
Camden - New Jersey
Disinfection of effluent
B
Wood Lynne
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 40% to 85%
B
Mount Ephriam Boro
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 70% to 85%
B
Brooklawn
Camden - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 40% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
B
Woodbury Heights
Gloucester - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 20% to 85%
B
National Park
Gloucester - New Jersey
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Disinfection of effluent
B
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Municipal Discharges
Responsibility ^
Municipality Treatment Priority
County - State Need
Darby Creek Joint Sewer Disinfection of effluent B
Authority
Delaware - Pa.
Eddystone Township Increase UOD removal B
Delaware - Pa. from 35% to 85%
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary
Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
SIC
Treatment
Need
Estimated Costs
Capital Total'
Priority
Ruberoid
Gloucester City
Camden - New Jersey
Georgia § Pacific Corp.
Delair - New Jersey
Roebling
Roebling - Burlington
New Jersey
MacAndrews § Forbes
Camden - Camden - N.J.
E.I. DuPont, Repauno
Gibbstown - Gloucester
New Jersey
Monsanto
Bridge Port
New Jersey
Gloucester
2661
2631
3312
2631
2819
2818
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 20% to 85%
102,000 172,000
223,000 343,000
923,000 2,486,000
697,000 1,447,000
Increase UOD removal 4,329,000 16,118,000
from 35% to 85%
2,731,000 5,424,000
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs 0 3% over 20 years
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
SIC
Treatment
Need
Estimated Costs
Capital
Total'
Priority
New Jersey Zinc 2816
Gloucester City
Camden - New Jersey
Hercules Powder Co. 28
Gibbstown - Gloucester
New Jersey
Atlas Chemical 2818
New Castle - New Castle
Delaware
Tidewater 2911
Delaware City
New Castle - Delaware
Gulf Oil 2911
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
Atlantic 2911
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Control of acid discharge
Increase UOD removal
from 65% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 80% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 65% to 85%
546,000 5,087,000 A-7
728.000
310,000
362,000
819,000
643,000
882,000
A-8
A-9
A-10
2,099,000 2,560,000 A-ll
1,516,000 3,095,000 A-12
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs § 3% over 20 years
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary
Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
SIC
Treatment
Need
Estimated Costs 2 Priority
Capital Total
DuPont, Chambers
Deepwater - Salem - N.J.
Sun Oil
Marcus Hook
Delaware - Pa.
F.M.C. Corp.
Marcus Hook
Delaware - Pa.
Texaco
Westville
Gloucester - New Jersey
Allied Chemical
Claymont
New Castle - Delaware
Sinclair
Trainer - Delaware - Pa.
2818
2911-
281
2821
2911
2819
2911
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Control of acid
discharges
Increase UOD removal
from 75% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
24,410,000 58,416,000 A-13
2,618,000 6,047,000 A-14
196,000 1,178,000 A-15
974,000 1,701,000 A-16
1,140,000 1,975,000 A-17
738,000 2,238,000 A-18
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs 8 3% over 20 years
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
SIC
Treatment
Need
Estimated Costs
Capital
Total
Priority
Scott Paper 28
Eddystone - Delaware - Pa.
Mobil Oil 2911
Paulsboro - Gloucester - NJ
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
2,695,000 6,235,000 A-19
10,398,000 22,080,000 A-20
DuPont, Carneys 2892
Penns Grove - Salem - N.J.
DuPont, Edgemoor
Edgemoor - New Castle
Delaware
28
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Control of acid
discharges
Control of acid
discharges
5,309,000 24,555,000 A-21
020,000 7,148,000 A-22
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
(2) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance costs @ 3% over 20 years
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Industrial Discharges
Treatment
Need
Priority
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
Paterson Parchment § Paper
Bristol - Bucks - Pa.
SIC
2649
R.D. Wood § Co. 33
Florence - Burlington - N.J.
U. S. Pipe § Foundry Co. 33
Burlington - Burlington - N.J.
Tenneco Mfg. Co. 28
Burlington - Burlington - N.J.
B.F. Goodrich Industrial Prod. Co. 30
Riverside - Burlington - N.J.
H.K. Porter Co., Inc. 3351
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
U.S. Steel Corp., Products Div.
Delair, N. J.
The National Sugar Refining Co.
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
34
2062
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
SIC
Treatment
Need
Priority
Publicker Industries, Inc.
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
2085
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Harshaw Chemical Co.
Gloucester City - Camden
N.J.
2819
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
U.S. Gypsum Co.
Phila. - Phila.
Pa.
3275
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
U.S. Navy Base
Phila. - Phila. - Pa.
3731
Increase UOD removal
from 0 to 85%
Shell Chemical Co.
Woodbury - Gloucester- N.J.
2822
Increase UOD removal
from 60% to 85%
Boeing - Vertol Division
Morton - Delaware - Pa.
34
Increase UOD removal
from 35% to 85%
Scott Paper Co.
Chester - Delaware - Pa.
2621
Increase UOD removal
from 60% to 85%
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Delaware Estuary Type: Industrial Discharges
Responsibility
Industry SIC
City - County - State
Chester Processing Co. 3334
Chester - Delaware - Pa.
Penn Industrial Chemical Co. 2821
Chester - Delaware - Pa.
Phila. Electric Co. (Chester Plant) 4911
Chester - Delaware - Pa.
Phoenix Steel Corp. 33
Claymont - New Castle - Delaware
Avisun Corp., Polymer Plant 282
New Castle - New Castle - Delaware
Treatment1 Priority
Need
Increase UOD removal B
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal B
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal B
from 35% to 85%
Increase UOD removal B
from 0 to 85%
Increase UOD removal B
from 35% to 85%
(1) % removal of 1964 waste loadings
-------
OTHER WATER QUALITY PRACTICES
Responsibility
FWPCA
DRBC
Corps of Engineers
N.J., Pa., Del.
Need
Instream control of floating
debris with debris sweepers.
Priority
A
FWPCA (Technical
Advisory 6
Investigations)
DRBC
Instream artificial aeration
required to meet dissolved
oxygen goals in Burlington-
Bristol Area.
Phila., Pa.
Camden, N.J.
Trenton, N.J.
Wilmington, Del.
Immediate need to control and
disinfect discharges from com-
bined sewer stormwater overflow
and measures taken for eventual
elimination of combined sewers.
City of Phila., Pa. Disinfection of 50% of overflow
City of Trenton, N.J. Disinfection of all overflows
MANAGEMENT, INSTITUTIONAL, AND LEGISLATIVE NEEDS
Responsibility Need
FWPCA
DRBC
US Geological"Survey
N.J., Pa., Del.
A detailed implementation and
management plan for meeting
and maintaining water use and
quality objectives through time
including the following
components:
Priority
A
19
-------
Responsibility Need
US Geological Survey,, a.
N.J., Pa., Del.
N.J., Pa., Del. b.
FWPCA c.
FWPCA d.
DRBC
US Geological Survey
water quality surveillance
waste discharge sampling
long and short range water
quality forecasting and
control techniques.
coordinated data collection,
storage,and retrieval program
including currently updated
inventory of municipal and
industrial wastes.
Priority
A
A
A
N.J., Del., Pa. Upgrading and expansion of state a
water pollution control construction
grants and sanitary engineering
offices.
Upgrading of sewage treatment plant a
operations, efficiencies, employees.
State of Delaware Legislation for greater appropriations a
to the State Grants Program so that
maximum advantage may be taken of
Federal contributions to construction
grants.
20
-------
B. Delaware Bay
The concern for the Delaware Bay is to preserve its present
high level of water quality. This can be done by developing a
comprehensive plan for the Bay by the FWPCA.
Responsibility
FWPCA
DRBC
US Geological Survey
N.J.. Delaware
IMMEDIATE NEEDS
DELAWARE BAY
Need
A FWPCA sponsored comprehensive
study of the Delaware Bay. This
would entail efforts of several
state and Federal agencies.
Priority
C
FWPCA
Dept. of Commerce
Economic Development
Adm.
Delaware Water § Air
Resources Commission
Kent County
(See Figure 1,
Kent CcJunty Problem
Area),
Coordination of construction grants
programs of the Dept. of Commerce,
Economic Development Adm., and the
Dept. of the Interior's Federal
Water Pollution Control Adm. on pro-
viding funds for a proposed regional
interceptor and disposal system for
Kent County, Delaware
21
-------
C. Upper Delaware
The water quality of the Upper Delaware from Trenton,
N. J., through and including the East and West Branches, is
generally excellent. Two areas of concern exist.
First, is the elimination or reduction of several
local nuisance discharges.
Second, a continued effort by the DRBC's Tocks Island
Region Environmental Study Advisory Committee (TIRESAC) to
develop regional waste water plans to protect the water quality
of the reservoir. Listed below is a summary of the specific
needs in the Upper Delaware River.
22
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Upper Delaware Type: Municipal Discharges
Location
Ref. to
Fig. 1
Responsibility
Municipality
County - State
Immediate Need
Priority
M-l
Hamlet of Barryville
Highland
Sullivan - N.Y.
Sewerage System
Secondary Treatment Facilities
M-2
M-3
Hamlet of Narrowsburg
Sullivan - N.Y.
Village of Hancock
Delaware - N.Y.
Sewerage System
Secondary Treatment Facilities
Secondary Treatment Facilities
M-4
M-5
M-6
Village of Walton
Delaware - N.Y.
Village of Delhi
Delaware - N.Y.
Village of Stamford
Delaware - N.Y.
Sewerage System
Secondary Treatment Facilities
Sewerage System
Secondary Treatment Facilities
Secondary Treatment Facilities
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Upper Delaware
Type: Industrial Discharges
Location
Ref. to
Fig. 1
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
Immediate Need
Priority
1-1
N.J. Power and Light
Holland - Hunterdon - N.J.
Eliminate thermal discharges
1-2
Riegel Paper Co.
Hunterdon - N.J.
Increase to secondary treatment
1-3
Sanco Piece Dye Works
Warren - N.J.
Treatment Facilities
1-4
J.T. Baker Chemical Co.
Warren - N.J.
Increase to secondary treatment
1-5
1-6
1-7
Pearsall Chemical
Warren - N.J.
Penn Power and Light
Lower Mt. Betha1
North Hampton - Pa.
Metropolitan Edison Co.
Upper Mt. Bethal
North Hampton - Pa.
Increase to secondary treatment
Eliminate thermal discharges
Eliminate thermal discharges
-------
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Location: Upper Delaware Type: Industrial Discharges
Location
Ref. to
Fig. 1
Responsibility
Industry
City - County - State
Immediate Need
Priority
1-8
The Borden Co.
Cochecton - N.Y.
Secondary Treatment Facilities and/or
Process Controls
1-9
Dairymans League
Cooperative Assn.
Callicoon - N.Y.
1-10
Consumers Dairy Co.
Hancock- N.Y.
1-11
Mid-State Milk
Products Corp.
Hancock - N.Y.
1-12
Est. of E.S. Ramburg
Hancock - N.Y.
Secondary Treatment Facilities
1-13
Meadowbrook Dairy
Walton - N.Y.
Secondary Treatment Facilities and/or
Process Controls
1-14
Dairymans League
Delhi - N.Y.
1-15
Bloomville Packing Co.
Bloomville - N.Y.
1-16
Middletown Milk & Cream Co.
Fraser - N.Y.
-------
OTHER WATER QUALITY CONTROL NEEDS
Responsibility
DRBC
FWPCA
N.Y., N.J.
Pa.
Need
Continued planning by the Tocks Island
Region Environmental Study Advisory Com-
mittee for a prevention of pollution of
the Tocks Island Reservoir.
Priority
C
Corps of Engineers
Control of runoff from the construction
site of the Tocks Island Dam.
26
-------
D. Interstate Streams in the State of Delaware Not in
the Delaware River Basin
The immediate needs for this area are summarized below:
Location
M-7
Buntings
Branch
(See fig.
1)
IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS
Responsibility Immediate Need
H.H. Poultry Co.
Selbyville - Del.
Sewerage System and Com-
bined treatment of poultry
and domestic wastes.
Priority
C
(See fig. 1) Sussex County A comprehensive plan is C
needed for collection and
disposal of sewage.
27
-------
III. IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS
A. Delaware Estuary
The immediate pollution control needs summarized above
for the estuary in section II-A eminated from a five year compre-
hensive study by the FWPCA. The results of this study have been
under careful and detailed scrutiny of the states of Delaware,
New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, the Delaware River Basin Commission,
local governments, and the general public.
The results of the study were presented in the form of
five possible alternative levels of water quality and the associated
costs and benefits. From these alternatives it was possible for
the region's regulatory agencies to select a water quality objective.
The decision has been reached to achieve a water quality goal that
will require a minimum treatment level of 85% of oxygen demanding
material.
The specific municipalities and industries to be affected
by this decision, the magnitude of required treatment, and the
estimated costs have been summarized above. More detailed information
for these dischargers are included in the inventory in Appendix A.
It is recommended that to obtain the water quality objectives
desired by the estuary region's water users, immediate action be
taken to implement the immediate needs. Specifically the
following:
28
-------
(1) A detailed implementation plan should be formulated
through the cooperative efforts of the DRBC and the
FWPCA's Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study staff.
(2) A management program is needed to maintain the
desired objectives through time once they are
reached, and to determine the necessity for and
feasibility of higher objectives in the future.
(3) The immediate pollution abatement needs should
not, however, be delayed by the above planning
requirement. The states and Federal construction
grants programs should begin to focus efforts
on these needs. Liaison between the state
and federal regulatory bodies, industry, and
municipalities should be intensified.
(4) The FWPCA's Storm and Combined Sewer Pollution
Control Branch should continue its liaison with the
City of Philadelphia in providing demonstration
grants for control of the city's overflows.
(5) The FWPCA's Research and Development Office, Division of
Engineering Development, should consider demonstration
grants for large scale studies of instream aeration
in the estuary. This may require coordination from
Technical Advisory and Investigations, the DECS, and
the DRBC.
29
-------
(6) Acquisition of debris sweepers to enhance
the value of the estuary for recreational
boating should be further investigated with
possible funds from FWPCA or Corps of Engineers.
Since many of the major waste dischargers have made
preliminary feasibility and cost analyses and are quite aware
of what will be required of them, implementation should be pos-
sible with minimum delay. However, because political and financial
forces may present some problems, the "A" Priority for immediate
waste treatment needs in the estuary has been subdivided. An
analysis has been made to quantify the effectiveness in meeting
the dissolved oxygen objectives per dollar cost for each major
waste source. In the summary in Section II above, the waste
sources have been listed in order of decreasing importance by
industry and municipality. For example, the first industry, A-l,
would be the one where any demonstration grant money or special
enforcement effort should first be expended for maximum effectiveness.
B. Delaware Bay
One immediate pollution control need in the bay relates
to alternative solutions of a problem area in Kent County, Delaware.
The area includes the St. Jones River watershed where numerous
treated municipal and industrial wastes, including those from Dover
30
-------
Air Force Base, are discharged to small streams which merge in a
tidal marsh on route to the Bay. The water in these streams have
low levels of dissolved ox/gen and high bacteria counts. The
discharge of toxic wastes endangers nearby seed oyster beds in
the Bay.
Two alternative solutions to this problem have been
suggested by Kent County's consulting engineers. One is to col-
lect all secondary waste discharges in an interceptor which will
run down the St. Jones River valley to an outfall about four miles
into the Bay. The second is to collect the effluent of the
secondary plants in a regional interceptor, treat it in a tertiary
treatment plant, and discharge this effluent into the St. Jones
River. The discharge from the tertiary plant would be expected
to enhance the water quality of the St. Jones and increase its
potential downstream use.
According to the consulting engineers' report, in absence
of any aid program to the county the total annual cost of the
tertiary treatment system is substantially less than the cost of the
Bay outfall. However, with a 50% grant from the Economic Development
Agency the Bay outfall would be less costly for the county and thus
would be recommended as the final solution.
31
-------
The immediate need for this problem is to coordinate the
various interdepartmental federal demonstration and construction
grants programs on developing one of these alternatives.
Specifically, the grants programs for the Dept. of Commerce,
Economic Development Agency, and the Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration should, if possible, combine their efforts on this
project.
The general concern for the Delaware Bay is that of
preserving the water quality at its present high levels. The problem
is that a detailed and comprehensive study of the Bay has not been made.
Such a study would include definition of the Bays' hydrodynamic
characteristics, the effect of the estuary on the Bay, the Bay's
economic value to the region, the projected industrial and urbanized
growth, and the impact of this growth on the water uses and water
quality. Also, the oyster industry is being threatened by the
subtleties of water quality in the Bay. Some investigators cite
siltation from dredging operations as the cause for destruction of "
some oyster beds. Another threat is the "oyster drill" that attack
the oyster seeds. This problem relates to the salinity variation
in the Bay. Another cause might be the yet undefined effects of the
estuary water on the Bay.
Questions such as these would be the subject of an FWPCA
sponsored Delaware Bay Comprehensive Study.
32
-------
The Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study staff has
recommended that this effort become an extension of its present
responsibility in the estuary. Similar methodology as used in
the estuary study would be used. The immediate need then is to
formulate the details of this comprehensive study. This would
include coordinating the efforts of the states of Delaware and
New Jersey, the Delaware River Basin Commission, the Federal
Water Pollution Control Administration, and any other organizations
such as the Fish and Wildlife Service.
C. Upper Delaware River
The immediate needs in the Upper Delaware are to abate
several local nuisance discharges. These discharges result in
potential local health hazards, degraded aesthetics, and produce
a locally degraded environment.
The heated discharges of three steam electric generating plants
are also considered local nuisances. These discharges have been
reported to increase local temperature of the river as much as
25°F. The solution to these heat discharges is considered to be
the construction of cooling towers and the costs for abatement have
been estimated on the basis of these cooling towers. Other alternatives
could be used, such as lagooning or Jettying. However, consideration
of these would entail a much more detailed engineering study.
33
-------
The region of the Upper Delaware between Port Jervis,
N. Y., and Riegelsville, N. J., is the location of the planned
Tocks Island Reservoir and National Park. The influence of this
project on the development of this area is anticipated to over-
whelm the existing water supply and waste disposal facilities.
The Reservoir which will be completed by 1970 is expected to
attract a large seasonal influx of people and will stimulate
substantial growth.
The Delaware River Basin Commission has formed the Tocks Island
Region Environmental Study Advisory Committee to develop a regional plan.
This committee, composed of representatives of the Basin states
and Federal water resources agencies, will formulate and approve
plans for waste treatment facilities to preserve the water quality
in the area.
Studies are needed on the effects of the reservoir on
water quality and ecology of the river downstream and the effects
of the reservoir on local ground water supplies. Immediately needed
are controls on earth disturbance and sediment transport during the
construction phase of this project.
Another need for the upper Delaware is the design and
definition of alternative management programs to effectively control
the water quality of the river and its tributaries through time.
34
-------
The use of systems analysis and simulation techniques would allow
identification of potential problem areas and permit institution
of control measures before unsatisfactory conditions actually occur.
This would be the responsibility of the FWPCA comprehensive programs
working with the Delaware River Basin Commission.
35
-------
D. Interstate Streams in the State of Delaware Not
in the Delaware River Basin
Two immediate needs were isolated in this area. The first
is a small local nuisance condition on Buntings Branch Creek. According
to the Delaware Air and Water Resources Commission, the town of
Selbyville, and the H. 11. Poultry Co. are discharging raw sewage
via land runoff. One solution to this situation would be the combined
collection and treatment of the poultry and domestic wastes.
The other need relates to a comprehensive planning effort
needed for an area of Sussex County near the Atlantic Seacoast. (see
figure 1).
The problem is one of potential severe pollution in the
seacost area resulting from seasonal influx of up to 5,000,000
persons per year during the next 10 years. Presently, only a few of the
incorporated towns in the area have sewerage systems today. Some
of these are outdated and overloaded.
The immediate need, according to state and county
officials, is for federal government assistance to give technical
and financial support to develop a sound waste water collection and
treatment plan.
36
-------
IV. COSTS
The costs contained in this report have been estimated by
the staff of the Delaware Estuary Comprehensive Study, obtained
from the individual waste dischargers, or excerpted from reports
of the state and interstate agencies.
The costs for the Delaware Estuary represent the expenditures
required to meet and maintain the desired water quality objectives
to the period 1975 to 1980. The total cost given for each waste
source in Section II-A above is the sum of the capital expenditure
for waste treatment facilities and the operation and maintenance
costs for twenty years brought to a present value at 3%. The costs
have been summarized in the table below.
It should be noted that one category of costs for the estuary
includes that of treating wastes of an expanding economy. The
distribution of these projected expenditures is dependent on the
regional growth patterns in the area and thus cannot be designated
for any one or combination of present waste sources.
37
-------
TABLE I
Cost
A. DELAWARE ESTUARY
Ca^
Total
1
1. Treatment of A-Priority Municipal Wastes $68,650,000 $110,572,000
2. Treatment of B-Priority Municipal Wastes 5,428,000 7,837,000
3. Treatment of A-Priority Industrial Wastes 63,064,000 170,649,000
4. Treatment of B-Priority Industrial Wastes 10,890,000 13,150,000
5. Treatment of Projected Waste Loadings 77,025,000 137,928,000
6. Instream Aeration 3,510,000 7,540,000
7. Debris Sweeper 1,150,000 2,850,000
8. Disinfection of Stormwater Overflows 2,140,000 3,570,000
Total for Estuary $231,857,000 $454,096,000
B. DELAWARE BAY
1. Tertiary Treatment Plant for Kent County 9,827,000
and Related Treatment Facilities
2. Delaware Bay Comprehensive Study
Total for Bay
16,821,000
400,000
9,827,000 17,221,000
C. UPPER DELAWARE RIVER
1. Municipal
2. Industrial
1,940,000 2,187,000
8,410,000 14,430,000
Total for Upper Delaware 10,350,000 16,617,000
D. STATE OF DELAWARE - SELBYVILLE 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total for State of Delaware - 1,000,000
(1) Total present value of capital plus operation and maintenance
cost @ 3% over 20 years.
38
-------
V. RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL
1. The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) has adopted
a resolution to its Comprehensive Plan for a basin-wide pollution
abatement and control program. This program generally requires
a minimum of 85% reduction of oxygen demanding material and
disinfection of all domestic wastes including some portion of the
stormwater overflow.
2. The DRBC decision for the estuary is based predominantly on
the result of the FWPCA's five year comprehensive study. This study
used an interdisciplinary approach whereby engineering, biological,
economic, demographic, and socialogical aspects were investigated
and discussed at length with advisory groups. Forty-five major
municipalities and industries directly contributed to the develop-
ment of the program.
3. State of New Jersey has issued a directive requiring all
municipal sewage treatment plants to have a minimum of secondary
treatment.
4. Specific recent actions taken to control pollution include:
a. City of Philadelphia, Northeast Treatment Plant - Planned
modification of existing secondary plant to contact
aeration.
b. Wilmington Sewage Treatment Plant - Activated sludge
plant under construction.
39
-------
c. Camden Sewage Treatment Plant - Construction completed
for in-plant improvement.
d. Philadelphia Southwest Treatment Plant - Partial scale
operation of effluent chlorination for polyelectrolytic
solids removal.
e. Sun Oil Company - Major in-plant process and house-
keeping changes yielded 40% load reduction.
f. The Atlantic-Richfield Co. - Reduced waste flow by
instituting greater water reuse; estimated 20% load
reduction.
g. MacAndrews and Forbes Co. - A production process dis-
continued - 55% reduction of load.
h. Hercules Powder Co. - Final construction stages of
addition to present treatment facilities.
i. Monsanto Co. - Completed construction of acid waste
recovery unit.
j. New Jersey Zinc Co. - Completed construction of a
primary treatment facility.
k. Ruberoid Co. - Presently negotiating to discharge all
process waste to a municipal treatment plant.
1. DuPont de Nemours Co. - Have stated their intention to
reduce their present acid discharge by 50%.
m. City of Philadelphia passed a $25 million bond issue
as a first step in upgrading sewage treatment facilities.
40
-------
VI. BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Delaware Estuary
Characteristics
The 86 miles Delaware Estuary (see figure 1) receives
the drainage of approximately 11,330 square miles of the total
12,765 square miles In the entire Delaware River Basin. It
receives the wastes from about 6 million persons either directly
or by way of Its 23 major tributaries. Over one hundred industries
discharge their wastes directly into the estuary and/or use the
waters of the estuary for processing or cooling. Industrial waste
includes those for the metal processes, the chemical Industry, the
oil refining and petro-chemlcal industry, the pharmaceutical indus-
try, and the food processing industry. In addition, the estuary
receives organic and bacterial loadings from combined sewer over-
flows. The problems of this system are further complicated by
tidal oscillations which can directly transport wastes eight miles
upstream or downstream from Its point of discharge on a single
tidal cycle. Over several tidal cycles this zone of Influence can
extend many times the eight miles.
Water Quality
The water quality of the estuary at Trenton, New Jersey,
is generally excellent, but begins to deteriorate rapidly below that
point (see Table I). From Torresdale, Pennsylvania, to below the
41
-------
Pennsylvania-Delaware State Line the deterioration becomes extreme.
As a result of waste discharges, dissolved oxygen is almost com-
pletely depleted In some locations and gases £rom anaerobic de-
composition of organic deposits are produced regularly during the
summer. Coliform bacteria concentrations are very high in this
same stretch of river. Acid conditions in the river caused by
industrial waste discharges have been observed for several miles
above and below the Pennsylvania-Delaware State Line. Surface
discoloration due to the release of oil from vessels and surround-
ing refineries is a common occurrence from Philadelphia to below
the State Line. Overflows from confined sewerage systems result
in a discharge of fecal matter and other offensive solids, floating
material, and miscellaneous floatsam which would normally be trapped
by the treatment plant. This material represents one of the few
remaining types of discharges that can seriously affect the aesthe-
tics of the estuary by discharging visible evidence of raw sewage.
Floating debris from deteriorating piers and wharfs and from
natural runoff presents a hazard to recreational boating. The net
result is a polluted waterway which depresses aesthetic values,
reduces recreation, sport and commercial fishing, and inhibits
municipal and industrial water uses.
Intrusion of salt water from the bay, while not caused by
pollutional discharges, also imposes a limitation on municipal
and industrial water uses during periods of extended low flows.
42
-------
A mathematical modeling of the Delaware Estuary (I.e.,
categorizing the estuazy In specific mathematical terms) per-
mitted the evaluation of the independent effects of each of the
aforementioned waste discharges on the present level of quality,
and afforded an opportunity to formulate alternative control
programs to achieve specific objectives. This approach required
the development and application of new techniques of systems
analysis, operation research, and computer utilization to pro-
vide a rational basis for water quality Improvement.
43
-------
TABLE II
AVERAGE WATER QUALITY
DELAWARE ESTUARY
July Throueh September. 1964
River Water Diss. BOD M.F. Synthetic
Station Miles Temp. Chlorides Oxy. mg/1 pH Turb. Col. Phenol Detergent
Above
Mouth
°C
mg/1
mg/1
Units
#/100
ml (a)
mg/1
(ABS)mg/l
Trenton, N.J.**
134
25.8
7
-------
VI.
B. Delaware Bay
Characteristics
The Delaware Bay (see figure 1) covers an area of 782 square
miles. It receives the total drainage of the 12,765 square miles
Delaware River Basin. The Bay is also influenced to a large extent
by the Atlantic Ocean which causes tidal currents of 1 to 2 knots.
The bay is highly saline and dissolved oxygen levels are usually near
saturation.
The bay supports substantial oyster and commercial fishing
industries. Potential for recreation Including swimming, water skiing,
and sport fishing is high and adjacent marsh areas support multitudes of
wildlife.
The cause and effect relationship of water quality and effects
on water uses in the bay are unknown quantities. A comprehensive water
quality surveillance program has never been carried out. This would be
one of the major responsibilities of a Delaware Bay Comprehensive Study
by the FWPCA.
45
-------
VI.
C. Upper Delaware River
Characteristics
The upper Delaware River extends from head of tide at
Trenton, New Jersey, to the head waters in the East and West branches
of the Delaware in the lower New York State (see Figure 1). The
precipitation in the Basin averages 44 inches per year and is distri-
buted fairly evenly over the entire year. Stream flow is generally
abundant and water quantity is not generally considered a problem in
the Basin. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the historical flows In
the main stem of the Delaware.
Water Quality
The water quality in the upper Delaware is generally of
excellent quality. Above Port Jervis, New York, the dissolved
oxygen levels are near saturation, have low hardness levels, and
are of high clarity. Between Port Jervis, New York, and Riegelsville,
New Jersey, the dissolved oxygen decreases about 1 to 3 mg/1 below
saturation levels at some points. This is a result of increasing
population densities. The intra-state Lehigh River significantly
alters the quality of the Delaware, and does present a problem area.
However, the solution to this problem and abatement needs are beyond
the scope of this report, but will be Included In a later report on
the immediate needs in the intra-state streams In the Delaware Basin.
Between Riegelsville, N.J., and Trenton, N.J., the dissolved oxygen
is usually near saturation and the general water quality is excellent.
Table 5 summarizes the water quality for the upper Delaware River.
46
-------
Table III
SUMMARY OF FLOWS
DELAWARE RIVER
Miles Above Years Drainage Flow-cfs
Mouth of of Area Maximum Minimum Mean
Station Bay Record Square daily dally Annual
Miles
Trenton, N.J.
134.
,5
52
6,780
329,000
1,220
11,680
Riegelsville, N.J.
174.
8
58
6,328
340,000
870
11,070
Belvidere, N.J.
197.
,7
42
4,535
273,000
609
7,983
Montague, N.J.
246.
,3
24
3,480
250,000
412
6,080
Port Jervis, N.Y.
254.
,7
60
3,076
233,000
175
5,537
*Source - Surface Water Records of New Jersey. Flows at
Trenton are unadjusted for diversions above station.
Table IV
FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF 7- AND 30-DAY LOW FLOWS*
DELAWARE RIVER
Minimum Average Flow. CFS
Recurrence
Interval Trenton Riegelsville
(Years) 7 day 30 day 7 day 30 day
50
1300
1540
1020
1190
25
1350
1600
1180
1350
20
1380
1620
1210
1400
10
1480
1700
1350
1550
5
1600
1850
1510
1780
47
-------
Table V
WATER QUALITY
UPPER DELAWARE RIVER
Constituent
Montague,
N.J.
April-
Dec., 1961*
Delaware River
@ Martins Creek
Oct., 1962-
Sept., 1963**
Riegelsville,
N.J.
April-
Dec., 1961*
Trenton,N.J.
July, 1963-
June, 1964***
Mean concentrations In mg/1. except as noted
16.7
9.2
5.7 Min.
6.3-9.7
Temperature -
°C
Dissolved
Oxygen
Biochemical
Oxygen Demand
Chemical Oxygen
Demand
pH - (range)
Sulfates
Chlorides
Phosphates
Nitrites (N)
Nitrates (N)
Dissolved Solids
Hardness
Calcium &
Magnesium
Non-carbonate
Color - units
Turbidity - units
Specific
Conductance
(mlcromhos)
- No data
~Interstate Committee on the Delaware River
**Source - PHS National Water Quality Network
***Source - Delaware River Estuary Comprehensive Project
9.2
11.9
10.2
6.9 Min.
1.1
14
6.8-8.0
11
4
0.1
54
28
9
14
18.5
8.6
5.2 Min.
7.2-9.2
8.0
13.6
11.8
8.1 Min.
2.6
6.3-9.2
0.2
0.03
0.7
63
35
146
48
-------
D. Interstate Streams in the State of Delaware Not
in the Delaware River Basin
Characteristics
This area of the State of Delaware not in the Delaware
River Basin and the interstate streams therein are shown in the
shaded area on Figure 1. This area represents about 45% of the
total area of the state. Many of the streams in the state have
their origins in swamps or bogs. The slopes of most streams are
very slight. Rainfall in the area averages about 44 inches per
year.
49
-------
REFERENCES
1. Delaware Intra-state Water Resources Survey, State of
Delaware, 1959
2. Water Quality Control Study, Tocks Island Reservoir, Dept.
of the Interior, FWPCA, N. Y., N. Y., June 1966
3. Delaware Estmary Comprehensive Study, Preliminary Report
and Findings, Dept. of the Interior, FWPCA, Phila., Pa.
July 1966
4. Delaware River Basin Commission, Fourth Water Resources Program,
Trenton, N. J., November 1966
5. Comprehensive Sewerage Study, Kent County, Delaware,
O'Brien and Gere, Consulting Engineers, Syracuse, N. Y.,
January, 1967
6. Modem Sewage Treatment Plants, How Much Do They Cost?,
U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public
Health Service, 1964
7. Specifications and Costs, E. E. Seelye, Vol. II, John Wiley
and Sons, Inc., New York, 1946
8. Comprehensive Plan for the Prevention and Abatement of
Pollution , New York State Department of Health, June, 1964
-------
APPENDIX A
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER USE AND
WASTE WATER INVENTORY
DELAWARE ESTUARY
-------
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER USE AND
WASTE WATER INVENTORY
The Municipal and Industrial Water Use and Waste Water
Inventory contains a listing of all known significant water with-
drawals from and waste discharges to the Delaware Estuary and its
tidal tributaries.
The inventory does not include withdrawals and discharges
to the non-tidal portions of the estuary basin, except where such
data is directly relevant to or has a pronounced effect upon the
estuary proper. The water use data contained herein was compiled
between 1962-1966; the major portion of the waste discharge data
was obtained during the DECS waste effluent sampling program in
1964-65.
The individual entries are listed in geographical order from
upstream to downstream. When water withdrawals and waste discharges
for a given listing are sufficiently removed from one another, or if
a listing has multiple water withdrawals, a separate entry was made
for each. Also listed are physical features and landmarks which
might aid in the geographical location of the entries with respect
to the estuary.
-------
GENERAL INFORMATION
Column (1) Name and Location
Name of the municipality, municipal water company or industry
and location. Entries followed by a (1) were routinely sampled
during the DECS waste effluent sampling program.
Column (2) Mile
Approximate mileage location of each entry along the estuary,
including the upstream distance of the specified tributary (as
measured from a line drawn across the tributary mouth at the shore
line.)
Column (3) Estuary Section
DECS model section used for computational purposes.
Column (4) SIC Code
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) as determined for
each industry using Standard Industrial Classification Manual,
Executive Office of the President, Bureau of the Budget, 1957.
Four digit classification numbers are indicated whenever possible;
however, if undeterminable a two or three digit classification was
substituted.
Column (5) 1960 Census Population or Employees
For municipalities, the entry shows the 1960 population as
reported by the U. S. Bureau of the Census. For industries, the entry
shows the number of plant employees. Absence of a notation near the
-------
employee figure indicates a five day work week. Footnote (2)
indicates a six day work week and footnote (3) indicates a seven
day work week. Data obtained from 1962 Inventory, Municipal Waste
Facilities, Region II, USPHS Pub. No. 1065 Vol. 2 and the DECS
Water Use and Waste Water Inventory Forms.
Column (6) 1960 Estimated Population Served
Unbracketted figure represents the estimated population served
by the water supply facilities; bracketted figure represents the
estimated population served by the waste disposal facilities. Data
obtained from (1963 Inventory - Municipal Water Facilities, Region II,
USPHS Pub. No. 775 Vol. 2, 1964) and (1962 Inventory - Municipal Waste
Facilities, Region II, USPHS Pub. No. 1065, Vol. 2, 1963.
Column (7) Townships or Boros Served
The municipalities and/or townships served as determined from
existing USPHS water supply and waste water inventories (above) and
from direct contact with the municipality in question.
WATER SUPPLY
Column (8) Source of Supply
Source from which raw water supply is obtained. Specific streams
are named whenever possible. If an entry is served by another facility,
the mile location of the facility is given. Data obtained from 1963
Inventory - Municipal Water Facilities USPHS Pub. 775, Vol. 2 and DECS
Water Use and Waste Water Inventory Forms.
-------
Column (9) Quantity (MGD)
The average daily quantity obtained from the source of supply
(surface, wells, public). Water users totaling less than 0.10 MGD
were excluded from the listing. Data obtained from 1963 Inventory -
Municipal Water Facilities, USPHS Pub. No. 775, Vol. 2, DECS Water
Use and Waste Water Inventory Forms and direct contact with the
municipal representative.
Column (10) Treatment
Treatment processes employed before subsequent water use.
Municipal treatment facilities coded as per 1963 Inventory -
Municipal Water Facilities, USPHS Pub. No. 775, Vol. 2. Industrial
water treatment delineated as found in the DECS Water Use and Waste
Water Inventory Forms.
Column (11) Quantity (MGD)
Water quantities used by industries for sanitary, process
and/or cooling purposes. Data obtained from DECS Water Use and
Waste Water Inventory Forms.
WASTE DISCHARGE
Column (12) Flow to Stream (MGD)
Total waste flow from municipality or industry to the estuary
or surface watercourse immediately tributary to the estuary. If an
entry is served by another facility, the mile location of the facility
-------
is given. Data obtained from 1962 Inventory - Municipal Waste
Facilities, USPHS Pub. No. 1065, Vol. 2, DECS Water Use and Waste
Discharge Inventory Forms.
Column (13) Type of Waste
Qualitative breakdown of the nature of the waste discharge.
D - Domestic Waste
I - Industrial Waste
S - Storm Water Run-off
P - Process Waste
C - Cooling Water
Data obtained from DECS Water Use and Waste Water Inventory
Forms and direct contact with municipal representatives.
Column (14) Treatment
Treatment processes and/or waste reduction measures employed
before discharge. Municipal treatment facilities coded as per the
1962 Inventory - Municipal Waste Facilities, USPHS Pub. No. 1065, Vol.
2. Industrial treatment delineated as found in the DECS Water Use
and Waste Water Inventory Forms.
Column (15) Estimated % Removal of Oxygen Demanding Material
Percent removal of oxygen demanding material estimated from the
type of treatment process employed and/or obtained from the representa-
tives of the particular waste source.
-------
Column (16) Carbonaceous Oxygen Demand Load (tf/Day)
Carbonaceous oxygen demand loadings to the Delaware Estuary
as obtained from the following sources: 1) computed from sampling
data foT twenty-three (23) industrial and eight (8) municipal
sources; 2) calculated for the remaining industrial sources from
data provided on DECS Water Use and Waste Water Inventory Forms;
3) calculated for the remaining municipal sources from the estimated
1964 population served and 0.286 lb. Lc/capita/day in conjunction
with the treatment processes employed. (0.286 lb. Lc/capita/day
determined from DECS municipal sample data.)
Column (17) Receiving Stream
Surface watercourse to which waste is discharged. Data obtained
from 1962 Inventory - Municipal Waste Facilities, USPIIS Pub. No. 1065,
Vol. 2, and DECS Water Use and Waste Water Inventory Forms.
Column (18) Remarks
Comments pertinent to the water supply and waste discharge of
the individual sources.
-------
APPENDIX A
MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER USE AND
WASTE WATER INVENTORY
GENEPAL INFORMATION
WAT E R S UPPL Y
WASTE DISCHARGE
REMARKS
iU
ti>
_JL_
¦M
tfl
H\}
9)
(14)
<»>
<14>
(L»
(U>
tuu
titwn
StCtlM
SIC
Co*
c—am
•r
CatlMtod
PopwlOClOi
Urm4
¦ tone*
Toewklpe or ¦ of
»«rW< II twrply
Cualtty (MS)
TtMtaaat
0* (HCD) I n"
I Co
Tm
of
imu
TlWtMflt
latlaatad
1 l*w*al
of (tajtw
tlnrtlnt
CirbwMM
i»9IM Bnaat
LMd (t/Orny)
tectltin
SlIMB
turfaca
u*u
rotiic
Pro*
T1UTCM. M. t
1.4 ,
0
114,147
1*7,000
Tnttoi mmd parts
of Mai, RatlCM
m4 Lmm I^i.
OaliMii
llvar
12. *j
P-DC. C*l, TC,
(KTPS 8V), nu,
KCP, DC, MC
*
| •••
B uu
1 1M.0
WUUVlUfc, fA.
IM.)
0
I, TV
]),W0
n&nUvtlla n4 B fiilwui
pirti of Umt 1 tivor, .alia
IWuftiU mi PaIU II
T^o. ||
1.30
O.JO
'
P-CAS, *?, 80,
na, o (sa.)
I-AC, CAL. M. S.
rn, oc (will) 1
*
'
I IM
¦ Ml*
I U).l
ASU»Ui cuzx
133.*
0
tuvtcb pall Lin.
IZifi or Til*
1)).)
0
WLCMIOD tuuu 4
PLASTIC CO..
NOUISVIUI. FA.
1)1.4
m
M4
-
"
Palawara
Ckloir?,
foklle
0.25
0.03
a_
0.03
0.03
0.20 1 «•»
P-C
Born*
"
'
Dal wan
btoaq
Aloe OladUrs* to Itialclpal
•rttm.
mutsviui, n.
11).1
-
i.rvo
(1.000)
"
>•« Hila
11A.S
2.70
D-I
tcOJtbCm
tciDftrtC
310
DllMTI
bt«t7
nnsmts ranr
or a.j., uc..
112.4
2012
no
-
"
[Wlavaxa
MUc, balls
1.4)
0.45
0.20
taw
-
0.43
1.43
1.70
P-C
Mom
"
~
Dflatm
b(MT7
Aloe DlKbll|l to HaIcIhI
•poc^.
hum, a.J. ">
112.0
i
114,1*?
(141,710)
Trueoi. hti of
laHloo, Mli| 4
Iwtnn T«pt.
So* Hlla
1)4 6
19.70
D-4-
s
KPtbClo
S3
3.040
PilMd
biufr
numi comical a>..
mftlSVILU, PA.
1 il *
i
2SI
<" 140
"
"
toll*
-
9.40
*
—
*
0.20
0.20
0.20
c
l looea
-
-
rmic soviet ucnic
IB CAS CO.,
mra. i. j.
1)1.0
i
4*11
(1) „
¦
¦
OalMMT*
litau),
PvfclU
4)0.00
*
0.10
DMlHialllltlOB,
Cblof Iuk lao
0.03
0.03
430.00
130.00
C
¦avtrallaatloo
"
Dal Mat*
btuiy
TniBMit of MMtiililBi
waau Mtar only.
aossriau am
119.2
2
MMILTO T*».. B.J.
WB.J-J.O
2
"
4»,0)5
¦aalltsa Tmp.
Sm Mil*
IJ4.6
4.10
0
c Ptr I
»
1,700
Cmwldi
Crook
•OtDOTOMI. ¦•J.
120.1-0.}
2
"
4 .Trt
U«. »»»>
io,ton
(h ,000)
tordraCow mi port
of brltaton 1M.
WlU,
Sprios*
1.00
¦*
I-*, F, DC, KCP
-
o.ao
D
MtflM
DfrtlcMa
43
340
SlMkJ
Crook
¦OUUIUM TW.. B.J.
12I.2-I.O
2
"
-
(1.000)
ktHrt littiti
t— Mil*
12S.2-0.3
0.10
E>
C Ac t
S3
40
-
o. s. mn. oov..(1)
PAIKUSS IIUI, PA.
127.0
2
))12
M r.ooo
"
Dataware
(at wary,
walla
2*9. iO
1.00
'
MlMBtltlM,
Plliratloo,
Cklot lutlw
1.50
43.00
204.00
290.00
P-C
oil
thldotn,
dM. tIMt.
ia
4.00
•
"
P-CALT, TC. 0C,
*T», fr*. ni,
¦O, Tl, T*
*
*
4.4C
D
ItOtlq
Dfnn, Ul, P»
•3
3,140
Dilam
KatMrj
ptra ce.,
UIITOl, PA.
112.0
)
2*4*
«» 400
1 Dalwara
1 biwT
12.»
-
"
Wftcaiog,
mtriiiutioB,
fllltitlet
*
7.30
1
4.SO
12.30
P-C
HavtrallutlM,
Mtantitln
S3
200
Dilann
btMn
ntmtaa, ¦. j.
122.0
1
))
4W
|| Oilwm
|l bt«uy.
II Mile
1.4)
-
0.1)
SctMlac
"
1.03
0. 73
1.33
P-C
Ism
0
443
Dalmn
btoarr
-------
GENE*
IN
FOR
MAT ION
WATER SUPPLY ti WASTE DISCHARGE "
. REMARKS
(1)
<*>
14)
(i)
(•)
(10)
(ID n
(14)
(15)
(It)
«7I
(II)
-
Mi*
Itlotry
Met Ito
sic
Coo*
I960
Canaw*
fSpUllIlM
Of
19*0
btiMttd
hftlitUa
MrtW
TomaMpa or
lerot Sarvad
Sourca
of
Quantity QCS)
Traataaat
M QO
H flea*
I to
H ft"*
^ y QKD)
TJH
ol
Waata
Trtataaoc
j*"-""*
>f oanam
Otaaai
IM4 (#/Oay)
ItcaWlfll
Uriia
rah II
pifltU CO*1.. LTD..
MtSTOt, »*A.
120.0
4
2141
2)0
Dtlatin
bturr,
Mill*
1.50
0.15
-
to f tea leg
1.45
l.ftS
C
¦oat
oaiwara
binary
UKtOIUS POWDU 00..
BmLlBTOI. 1. J.
170.0
4
2«
<» US
Mailt
0.90
¦avtralltatlao,
Sofualag,
Qrtorloatloe
0.10
0.10
0.90
P-C
Ml Sa»aratloa,
Ch^lctl traat-
ant, bio-
aaratloe,
alorlactloa
85
140
Dalwara
bttny
g. s. Pirr * ru*sutv co..
lUALI.'ffl'p*, J.
119.5
4
)1
m
"
"
DtlMir*
btHty,
r*Ue
O.SO
"
0.40
Nona
o.»
0.50
0.10
0.55
P-C
¦ooa
0
160
Balarara
Zitsirr
Dlacbarsa u agolclMl
•yaeaa.
ntlSTOL ao*i. PA.
119.2
*
"
12,144
93.000
trliul ad part of
•rlacol ttop.
Dalwara
Eaturr
J.50
-
:
P-CAL.TC.KT,
KX.PtS.TDO
-
"
-
Saa |i
118.T-
ASSiSiVsn carer
in.a
4
orru cuu
ua.i
4
tUILIHCTUN, 1. J.
111.7
4
"
12,487
It .000
(13.000)
Mlli|tM od pert
of tafltattoa TWp.
Wall*
"
1,50
"
KPC.0C
-
"
-
3.00
D-S
CIPthlcf olc
35
2,000
Dalavara
Ettoary
tuuncir* nr., i. j.
HI.7-1.0
4
•
"
(j.000)
U Cora Mutt H Im Hi I*
n iu.»
0.10
0
AcCteSO
13
100
Am It eta*
Craak
WtSTOL CUtO, u.
111.7-0.1
4
"
U.»4
(ii.ooo:
Brtatol md Irliul
TWp.
taa Kilo
119.2
3.50
0
XlO^ttOOfth
IcgLa
90
620
Octar
Craak
turn * MAS CO., StltTOL.
pa. <1>
118.0
4
2121
«2.7H
Oalavaxa
tot hit.
Mailt.
P*llc
24.00
0.40
0.70
CblorlaatLoo,
Softening,
Filtration,
Daloaltatloe,
Olatlllatloa
0.13
4,95
19.80
24.75
P-C
la procatt acid
nesi«7t Mid
astractloa,
natiiittioe,
Sklnlni,
¦aotrallutloe,
Trlcklta* (lllva
SodUtaatatloa.
LttOIMt
97
2,3)0
Dalatara
EatMiT,
Ottar
Croak
Alao dlaehifia co amlclpal
ayacaa.
rf&Ltc swvia KucTtie
k «.as co., nuucTd,
N. 1.
117.7
3
4911
m
¦
"
Dilmn
titury,
P^»Uc
2U.00
"
0.15
DaalMrallutlaa,
Olatlllatloa
0.05
0.10
264.00
288.10
c
"
"
Dalavara
lltotfr
rfticu kvc. oo.,
BUXLIKIW, ¦¦ J.
lit.)
3
21
[» K
¦
"
Mailt
*
1.00
"
Noaa
0.10
0.40
1.00
P-C
Hi ileal traanaa,
ladlaaocatloa
35
1,400
Dalavara
tltufT
locaodary traataaat procaaa
praaaatly oadar 4atlta (1966]
IIBMHnn COB
115.4
3
run mnui AinmaiTT.
PA.
US. 4-1.0
3
"
29,0*2
(9.000
Pm of r«Ui Np.
Soa HI la
122.)
I.so
D
ACmSd^o
85
430
¦ukal^
ClMft
IT"""* nv., PA.
in. >
3
"
4,000
Part of ImilM
TWp.
Orlllad
Mailt
"
0.40
"
DO
"
"
Soa ML
104.1
M-VCUT, P. J., (DSLAUAU
civra uatu oo.)
11*.0
1
"
),«00
24,700
(7,KM]
hnrlf n< partatf
larllnjitoa, Dilriai
0*1mco, (dsavatar,
llv«rald« TV»i.
Mailt
2.00
"
i-A,ppt,a.
oca
'
"
'
1.50
0
aacirtdCpBco
83
430
Dalaran
latwrr
a' AL'< IT TUTIUS.
inaii, i. j.
114.5
J
22)
1*2
"
-
Mailt.
PlAllC
"
0.50
0.05
loftaalag
-
0.55
-
-
-
-
-
Madiarsa watt a co aalelyal
lyatM.
E. 1. DUKtt, COOMTU
UICVTS, PA.
11). •
6
2119
(J) |,
"
-
Dalttiri
Lttoarr
2.10
"
Plltratloa
-
"
2.10
2.10
c
¦ooa
-
*
Qatar an
Kataary
poqanuB cub
111.*
4
»wr.. iivwiOE
i. i.
no.»-?.o
4
10
m
"
"
Ualli
0.4)
"
Sooa
*
0.25
0.20
0.45
P
¦ooa
0
)20
taacacaa
Craak
lOMttlt vaata to aMlelpal
tyataa.
-------
GCNEf
Ul in
FOR
2
0
<
5
WATER SUPPLY
WASTE DISCHARGE 1
1 REMARKS
n>
tf>
-122-
14>
_iu
(7)
(1)
(»>
(10)
(11)
(U)
(14)
(191
(14)
(17)
(U)
-
Uli
btmtjr
IhIIw
lie
Ca4«
1 NO
CMMt
ftfilMlta
1*00
UtlMM
TOfwlatiM
Sm«4 -
TMMklpa at
tore* Sara*
IMTM
•1
QaatUy 0O)
Ttaalwiil
Um (MO>)
Plaa
ta
tma
Iff*
a!
«ut<
TrutMvt
tat laa tad
I illBMl
>t Wy®aa
Maaadlai
Cafbooacaoua
uoqrfas oaaaa
Load (#/Day)
lacalvlai
itria
H
a. t. ram oo., dr*i
iraaui, s. j.
IU.M.I
jdi
Imcbcii
Crwfc,
Kali*
1.05
rir
Sattllaa,
Plltraslaa,
pa tfjaoiu,
Saftaalig
0.43
0.43
1.03
P-C
CfcMffUl
111 "y11
—m—
Craah
Saaaatit aaata ta aaicip«l
wytm.
tirastM w„ ¦. j.
110.0-1.0
4
-
4,174
(•.400)
U«nldi mi pin
sf Klnnl4i Taj.
•aa lUla
113.0
1.00
D
4flUi
as
410
Baaaaeaa
Csaak
BOM TW.. 1. J.
110.7
4
¦
<1.300)
Killald* bl|kt(
to* Ml La
113.0
0.20
D
4S
1*9
btwy
tm prima titaant plat*
la Mia 1fc». ta ba
caaaalUctad ltta aoa plan,
panic l»al IMS.
PlIliBB/lU MB 00.,
nau., pa. (wmTMir
rtua run)
110.4
4
¦
1,002,512
1,000,000
Part af Kill, ad
part el Ihm1«
Oalatara
bturj
200.00
-
'
Mo,oa,cii,
"
laa n.
04.1,
4.A.WJ
raanrMi can.
109.4
4
¦inrna bon>, a. j.
104.0
•
-
3,124
(3,700)
UlVTtM
Saa HI La
107.3
0.39
0
PcCMctaCl
09
220
Daliaia
biwy
nunu no, i. J.
10M
•
¦
7,034
20,000
(1,100)
ritarn Bora at
pot «f Claalira
Walla
*
1.40
4,icr,oc
*
-
-
0.45
D
SCFtBOa
09
300
btaur
¦. k. pom oo.. nc.
piila., pa.
107.1
4
SOH
400
-
-
Dalarara
tataoy,
P*itc
0.10
"
0.10
—
-
0.20
"
*
"
"
•
-
-
Hidtaip ta aalclpal
tyataa.
fumOQ qon (old)
104.1
*
m i mm oo.. niu.,
ri.
10*.1-1.0
•
21
<» 2,400
-
•
btMTT,
P*llc
12.40
*
0.70
IA
0.70
"
12.40
12.40
C
aeaa
-
_
Da lama
¦•tatty
Ooaaatla «ati ta aaldpil
ayataa.
rauan atm
10.1
*
caoMinaaa iw., i, j.
109. WO
9
*
1,302
<4,soo:
AT|—>I< btttM
Im HI la
107.3
0.45
ft
crtb
50
445
Thraa C&aaaalaaaa 1«p.
traataaat plati ca ba
caaaalldatad ta cm plaat.
Cra*
ummT
UH.3-2.5
*
"
1,302
(3,300
Part af Cl«algi«
t»p.
Saa Ml la
107.3
0.35
0
ClPtCptcSo
IS
150
Craak
0.1. IIUL COM. ,P10PPCTI
on.. oiLua. a. j.
tOS.3-1.0
•
34
130
-
H p^iic
"
-
0.10
¦aaa
"
0.03
0.03
0.10
P-C
¦aaa
0
35
Cra*
miuoBfiu coo DIV.,
mu., m.
105.2
•
Mil
[» 145
"
¦
Oalatara
¦ataasy,
PAIIc
4.00
"
O.OS
Bailar aatar
0.03
0.10
3.90
4.00
c
ha.
-
*
Da lama
(•tatty
Oaaaatla aaata ta aaldptl
aya«.
puotpon cm on)
104.4
•
ccsacu-PACiPic oocr.,
DCUtt. ¦. J.
104.3
10
MSI
720
*
H BM Av«U*la
2.00
p
Ina-all flltara
39
7,590
Oalatn
btwir
niuBonu suctuc oo.
aiaOMB RATI01,
PVILA.. PA.
104. S
10
4911
(» 127
oala»ara
btMiy
3*0.10
Scraaalaa,
QUrtutt«,
flltratlao,
Sofusloc
1.20
544.90
IM.10
c
Bam
Dalarara
lataary
ptn»pia inwiiifuu,
N. J.
104.3
10
33,771
39,400
(24,000)
mrckatHlte mi
MTU af Cain,
Cbany Ull T*f-
*iu
4.10
I-A,SB,DC,PP8,
0
"
"
"
4.00
0
WCtftDtk
73
2,230
Dalaraia
Cataary
PiriiMiwii, pa..
pommai gum run
104.1
10
"
2,002,512
(973,000)
PUlaiillfel*
Saa Rlla
no.4
L44.74
D-I
-1
79
125,230
Oalarcra
Cataary
cabo. a. j., m
PLOT
101.0
10
*
"
(3,300)
Pert* af Coin
»iit««itlU
Saa HI la
104.2 m4
•7.9
2.50
0-1
70
1,130
Dalam
Bataary
aoora ina
102.0
11
-------
GENE
QAL IN
FORMATION
WATER SUPPLY
WASTE OlSCMAROe | REMARKS
(1)
(2)
O)
0)
(A)
0)
(•)
(~)
(10)
(U)
(12)
fl3)
(14)
(14)
(11) II —OH
-
Mlo
bn*n
itelUi
SIC
Co*
1M0
Cnni
fcyilrtUo
19*0
MlMtM
hftluUi
Itmd
TOMttblpt or
Inn bm4
Sovrco
of
Supply
QMBtlty (HCS)
lYutMtt
Dm QCB)
vicm
to
ttVMM
Typo
ol
WUtl
TNIOMI
UtlaBtOi
I 1WWU
>1 rma»
>—nilng
CUtCMHWI
ow Vmtat
U«i (#/Doy)
Aocalrtaj
Strata
HfMI
11
¦uooarttLD. ». J.
102.0-4.0
11
~
12,201
ui.ooor
WinriiU
Im Itiu
97.1
1.00
0
ClPcoCScBc
sm
Ce«p>r
Kloor
¦AOOM TWP.. R. J.
102.0-4.0
11
"
17,Off
(B0)
*0t C»lllBfWB>J
Sm mu
97. 8
0.20
0
Sd^TtaCBVr
ts
so
Cmpit
Unr
¦Wiai TW1*., N. J.
102.0-3.0
11
-
ir.w
(1.700)
»¦—t
i« mu
97.8
0.10
0
ClPtbCplo
cs
100
Coopor
Uvor
Kltt 4 001 UtLATU CO.,
citta, «. J.
101.4
11
2m
O) vjo
~
-
tetaxn
btaary,
PAUt
1.00
-
0.10
britloa,
fettling
0.03
o.ss
1.10
1.00
c
—
-
-
Dolvtra
btMfT
Plicblfp to —Ulptl
IT*t«.
mufinnu tucuic co.
mi mm rtATiOB,
niu., pa.
101.1
11
*«ii
(>) 1M
-
-
OilMin
btuiy,
P*llc
MS.70
"
0.IS
IcroM tn»,
CkUrlMlUe,
OalaAiillutln
"
0.1S
263.70
MS.80
c
¦aatrallaatlM
-
-
DilMn
btM>7
tiMMtt of Mlar tltalat
Ntor ooly.
VKS BATIOKA! SOQU
uiuuu oo., mu„ nu
101.0
11
20*2
in
Dolmn
bturr,
P*ll«
17.23
0.73
OhlorlaoHM,
bftMllt,
pa KjaiMt,
Plltratleo
o.os
2.AO
1S.U H 17.93
p-c
Boo*
0
1,370
OolJHAra
btHn
Dl«tbif|i to — lclp>l
lyatM.
jam ft. (TAB 4 00.,
101.0
11
10
ISO
-
*
DiImk
btwif,
P^lle
0.M
0.10
Co^llttlM,
PI1 trail tm
o.os
0.AS
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dlidwigi to «Mlctp«l
•you*.
uoto amrounm ar
100.0
12
mi
10,000
"
-
Dilvirt
bluip,
P*ttc
20. S3
0.90
nitritlM.
aierlutita,
tefualq
1.0S
2.OS
11.23
11.00
c
I(M
-
hlMn
btun
D1 a chars* to oslclptt
¦yatom.
cgnwiti DirruxiK
can., ntu., pa.
91. A
11
2009
o> 11]
DilMn
EatMry,
utiu.
P*llc
A.90
0.6S
2.IS
BolUr food
Oaloelaatloo
1.10
9.10
9.20
c
•OM
Dilmti
btMfr
UaefcAfft to obIcIhI
¦yatoo.
•MBS 00.,
miu.. m.
U.J
1)
2171
ISO
*
"
Dilwu*
btMfy.
| Mite
O.SO
0.10
•olUr watar
tnivnt,
Softool 03
-
0.1S
0.43
! -
-
-
-
-
-
Maduip to onlclMl
ayatas.
caioo. ¦. J..
hah ruvr (l>
11
"
117. 319
(120,000)
Part of Cadi*
Sm NIU
97.9
22. AO
fr-1-
a
3D
59,310
OolWAI*
btMir
Oatfor itit* orAara to prowl*
¦ acootorr tfamt (194S).
CAMDO. H. J.
97.9
13
"
117.919
40.000
Pert of Cadn
u*iia
-
22.00
-
P-A,CAL,DC,N,
S.PAl.I-l.CL.
PTt.A
"
"
bo Hi.
97.9
•
¦. j. «m co..
caioo omn«
97.9
13
117,919
24,700
Pert of fain | UaMa
Nm«An T«y. Q
"
2.20
-
O-CL.Pl.K
-
"
-
im m
97.9
¦. j. hath oo..
Mim mcrrs division
97.•
11
•2,300
ttiwciiwr, Cterrr !
¦111. Hillri.
ftrtm TWpo.,
Pi it, brtiniM,
«*llMrr,
miui,
UMNfltU,
LMl*. Itt.
iptniB, mit>,
km.
1 *11.
3.SO
OCI
Sm Tom*hi pa or koroa
Ml ll< for VMtO dllCbiT|«l.
"SSTVW00-
11.1
11
2*21
AM
"
-
Oolovora
btotrr,
ttolU.
P*llc
7.90
0.30
0.03
Plltrttlea,
SoftOfilD(
0.03
3. AO
2.40
7.OS
P-C
tncill flltora
IS
12,423
Dalann
btMfy
Ho—ttle woo to to wlc>p*l
ayitoo. Om prateetloa
oporoeUo unlottW la 194S
ratead 41idMi|o to S0AOIM.
WIM1IHM BJRftlC 00.
wmui nun,
mu., pa.
97.A
11
Af 11
10»
ttolam*
btmy,
P*llc
JA3.40
"
0.13
tenonitis,
CklarUtlia,
Softofllag,
IMMIlllutlot
"
1.03
312.70.
mi. n
c
Intrtllutlti,
MlantitlM
"
"
DiImi
lAtMfT
fnMaw of kolUr clttalnt
mtor oaly.
CABCILL ISC., H1U.. PA-.
• 7.2
1)
20
»
"
bl««n
btM*r.
Walla,
Pwfellc
0.10
0.03
0.03
Softaolot
"
0.03
0.13
0.13
c
warn
"
"
0il«in
btMfT
pcbucxzb inomiq.
UK., mu.. PA. *"
97.0
1)
20»
<»*»
"
"
btoivy.
HblU,
13.45
1.30
0.23
aitrtutiM,
tolttaiot
*
I.SS
8. IS
14.43
c
Bom
0
1.300
DalMn
btMfT
Hicfcuii to aalelMl
¦yttoa.
-------
GENERAL INFORMATION
WATER SUPPLY
WASTE DISCHARGE g REMAWfvS
(1)
(2>
<»
(<•>
<»>
<6)
(7)
(8)
(»)
(10)
(11)
(12)
f13?
(14)
(15)
(It)
(17)
(18)
N«e*
Nil*
k«ctlo>
ilC
Codi
1940
Cantua
Population
or
1940
UClBlM
KfaUtlo«
>«rv«d
taffitblp* or
atr«i Stmd
Source
of
Sopply
Quality (MS)
TraaCMnt
0m (MB)
Plow
Co
Itfaaa
tJH
of
UUU
TraatMni
IttlaiM
& baml
if OMyfam
Mortal
Ctftaaeaou
0Da—at
(Ml
SocolTlaa
strata
Surfaci
-•11
Public
Saa.
Free.
Cool.
97.0
Ausumi mo. n, j.
~ 7.0- J.O
1)
*
10.440
(10.500)
IoMm
Sm Ml*
97.8
1.50
0
CIFtCEcOSc
85
490
¦mw
Crook
COLLIKSUOOC *0*0. R. J.
97.»-).0
1)
"
17.990
(25,000)
rii1llii|wri1
Sm Hi la
97.8
2.00
D
GaScteAoOacDcr
•ce
83
1,180
li
QMLLTV mtO. H. J.
97.0-2.0
13
4.771
(4.900)
Ml y»
Sm Ml la
97.8
0.4C
0
safticics
85
230
ii
wooo-ltuz soto. 1. J.
97.0-2.0
1)
J.U8
O.200)
tHMnM
Sm R1U
97.9
0.XI
0
die
40
630
¦avtoo
CTMk
Mar otata orfin to frvrlAa
anoriilary tnitant (1963).
PIlLAfCLPllA. PA.,
soutuast urn rouurrioo
comm. puutt
M.t
1*
2,002,512
(485,000)
RUMlplili
8m HI la
110.4 m4
HJU 95.J-12.
107.40
D-I-
15
170,110
Otlatan
btiur
«dar lul|>.
c Bute id co.. cLoocxrra
cm, «. j. <*»
93.0
14
2*41
330
-
"
Da I Mara
Eat airy
4.50
-
0.20
4. SO
3.50
F-C
Dorr-OllMr
Flltar
35
15,910
Dtlwuf
Iicmh
"""" CmiCAL CO.,
cuncuTvs cm, i. j.
95« 1
14
till
150
Dalvan
btoarr,
Halla.
F«bllc
o.to
1.40
0.05
Softmlns
0.05
0.15
2.05
2.0C
F-C-
D
Hooa
0
200
Dalatara
latuirr
¦tw JUSCT 2UK 00..
cunami cm, s. j.<1)
95. A
14
2814
O) jjo
"
"
Oilartvi
latowr,
Holla,
Fobllc
0.05
2.50
8.00
Floccalatloa,
Flltritln,
Cfalorlaatloo,
Ira mml
0.05
2.20
8.30
10.5!
F-C-
0
Sadlaantatlen
0
9,540
Dolarara
Eotaary
Mlantatlao baala for
•stlra vaata una c^UtM
ta 19*5. BfflMOt plpallM
ll«ck-0,5
14
-
15,511
15,000
(20,000)
Cloacoator City
Ualla
"
1.80
"
I-AT,80,FA,
DC
"
"
"
4.9!
D
aaSMtafthiiw*
70
1.760
US TWoi
Cn*
Km to tniflMt plat alao
mini Uutviilo, a. J.
msrrtus, ¦. j.
91.2
14
4,951
4,500
UMtvtllo aad part
of m* UM
D^lfori
Hall*
"
0.50
"
A.DC.PPS.
(9-0.4)
~
~
"
Im ML
n.5*
0.5
KBXTTUIU. SSIQAffT
91.2
15
niUBtLTMU UATS8 CO..
ttuar filth rum.
FBIIA.. FA.
95.2-1).0
15
-
,002.512
184,500
"
Sdwrlhlll
Kl«ar
70.00
P~SO,0C,CAL,TC,
HB,FI*,/FCf/,
0C.CC.VA
"
~
"
Im H
M.I 8
M.7
PVlLAMLniA WATU 00..
germ un ran* fuutt.
FUU.. FA.
95.2-12.5
15
,002,512
404,200
| Schaflklll
| U**r
1)0.00
P-OC.TC.SO.OC.
CA^nr.tcH,
K.na.oA
"
"
"
IM St
10.7
NiumMu urnic a.,
fODTUIU ttATlOB.
P8ILA., FA.
95.2*9.5
15
4911
» 140
H IdnrUUI
II btaiiT,
If Pobllc
1)9.95
1.90
knolii,
OlartartlM.
Mmallud*
"
1.95
1)9.90
141.85
P-C
littrtllutliB,
lallntttlw
"
fcb^lklll
litvaiy
fran—l of p«rttoa of waata
una ooly.
ALL 110 CXSaCAL OOtf.,
SAIttTT Dir.. nau., PA.
95.2*5.5
15
295
X»
Mnrlklll
litwy,
Nkllc
0.85
0.15
krmim,
Ft Itrotloo
0.35
0.49
0.50
c
IBM
*
"
5«h«yUlll
KitMfy
hTMMO mmtm f amlelMl
ryataa.
i.i. wnm. tvu*i h.
95.2-5.5
15
2951
1,119
M^UIU
btMfy,
P*lle
5.25
0.85
•earn
0.15
0.10
5.85
5.0
C
"
stihoruiii
Utury
toMotle al prooosa voato
to MBldpil ryaeao.
-------
OCNCPAt INFORMATION 1 WATER SUPPLY
WASTE
OISCMA
RGE
REMARKS
0) 1 (J>
ID
(9)
(4)
(7) 1 (ft)
<»1
(10)
(ID
U21,
(14)
(IU.
dftl
-uu_
I1U
-
HIl
UtMf)
ftaatiaa
SIC
Codm
1 MO
hpulit lac
or
1*M
UtlMtH
POp«l«tlOa
MlV«d
rewsfclH or 1 Sovrca
Wit Sarvatf H •'
II suppir
Quantity (KB)
Traat*«al
Um (MB)
Plow
u
Strata
0«)
tm
«<
Mlti
TTMtarti
UtlaataA
»l Oayfaa
taantflet
lltMUl
CtftaMcmi
QOTan Ommat
Uld (1/8*7)
bttlvltt
luia
V. 1. crMftl u..
mu.. rt.
—rr-
TW
"
-
U«ikiU
iiittn.
PAIIC
—nr
brtnloi
B
u
k^Ull'
llCMff
tTUnic nriiuc oo..
pvua.. pa.
W. J-4.0
ii
m
1.440
fdMTlklll
btatry,
**llc
2*.40
0.70
Cblorlaattoa.
SoftMlDf
UjoatmC
0.10
9.00
21.00
Jft.JJ
W-
D
Oil ftaparwara,
MnUtttiM.
Aaalcal
Coaamlatloe.
brtawntlw.
n««Ml«aa
Slaftt* flltritlsi
•i iHlMritln
•9
11,*29
IcfcapUllI
btHtr
now Ml wait* loai affoctod
tarlag 1M9; *a*ca lootf
Wbral to 17,410 9!Uf.
m* oa oo..
RXU.. M. (1)
*9.2-).0
IS
Nil
l.ifto
-
I hk«UIU
btaur
ftft.10
Oaatul
Coagalatloo.
ledleast stloo,
fllmtl«B,
Cklarlutloa.
b(tnto|
0.10
10.00
99.00
JO. *9
P-C-
0
011 bftittot.
lAoff cob
»
12.900
Sck^lkll
bta*n
«!<¦ tus CM 00.,
pwm.. m.
*9.2-1.0
19
1743
101
M^UUI
faiwrr
0.10
Sm HI la 91.2 -
4.0
0.10
"
"
"
latar pantiwl trm Atlaatle
larialat Co. Uaata 41acfaar«a*
tO BMldMl *T*t«.
1UMD. MC..
«miui, a. j. <"
*1.*
IS
mi
im s»
Oilwui
bIMTT,
MalU
*. ao
4.00
ftcraaal^,
PlltratlM.
aiortutl*.
lafml^
0.10
9.20
1.90
ft. 19
P-C-
0
011 hpHHiT
19
l.*99
klawn
lataary
c, i. un ua,
WU., PA.
~ 1.0
19
1711
ha
btMi7,
*1U.
Pvfcllc
19.*9
1*. 99
1.09
Pileratloo,
Ckltrlftttlai,
bfrnloi
1.70
9.09
79. n
n.os
P-€-
0
mtrillMtln.
¦m*r mfl
md platlog miu
triitinr
0
4«0
Da law an
lataar?
rraat partloa of vaata ittaa
Bthar bMtli mA latetrlal
aaau to mIcIhI ayicai.
mmmmi am
*1.9
IS
1
SMIL OMIICAL 00..
nmotr. ¦. j.
*1.)
IS
2422
°> 2»
"
-
Iblla
'
1.20
•
aisrlattUi,
Muol^
o.os
l.ftS
n 1.95
P-0
b«nllutlaa,
Oil ia»aiitar.
flUmlaa
40
200
hlaran
Bataafy
(((lont tlyallaa IliAutu
to rim ckaeaal.
WMOT. 1. i.
IS
12.45J
12.>00
(11,000)
hllfeu, Hit *f
Dyihrt M-
Ml*
l.B
ft.0CI.IC. CM. 0)
1.00
D
Old
40
2.070
iMkn
CfMk
Mir atata iriin t« provtfta
HfMliry tmiaaar (1M9).
WOOOAOtT tore. 1. J.
tl.»-2.9
19
-
1.721
(2.000)
ftaa UU
•1.9-1.0
0.90
ft
TtfifBltil
20
900
HwftiiT
CTMh
AftTIOUL PAB. ¦. J.
n.9-1.0
IS
"
1.M0
1,400
(1,400)
M(«wl r»A tmd
Mft of Hut
taptfec* M<
Valla
0.10
"
DC(S«BBr Oaly)
"
-
"
0,49
P
C
a
no
Cnak
Mar it at* orAara to »to*lb
¦ naoHry tnUMtt (1*44).
«n wiw nr.. ¦. j.
n.o
IS
"
-
9.000
P«rt of (test
iwpcfarft Tvp.
Halls
-
O.ftO
"
oca.sa.ic,
(*-0.*)
*
-
"
ftM Hi
n>u
munuiu, pa.,
iootiwiit MTtt poluttkb
IMIIM. PLANT H)
*0.7
Ift
"
1.002.912
(**0,000)
mii*ivbii
9m WU
*9.2-11.0
lift.05
ft-I-
1
MMaMDfchLa
40
19*.200
blarm
btany
taooaduT tnttaot yroeaaa
•ftir telp
wnA am
•ft.ft
u
rtoun. «. J.
•I.W1.0
1ft
>.121
ft, 200
(T.aoo)
Pwlatoro mi paxta
of CnMrtdi aari
Unt Dattforft T«*pa.
Utlla
2.90
1-JM.DC.PP3,
KCP.KPC
0.70
0
ai|H to rivar ckmal.
NOUL OIL 00.,
PACTUM. ¦. J. (1>
•7. J
14
Mil
J) 1.721
OllMFI
btitn,
Utlla
J*.00
2,*0
OMul
TnitMt.
fail—tit>«a.
tofualtt.
OtlMlittloa
0.10
It. IS
17.45
M. 99
P-C-
0
oil Stfinun
IS
29.490
Balaraa
btairr
-------
GENERAL INFORMATION
WATER SUPPLY D WASTE OISCHAROK
REMAftrv^,
(<>
(!)
(4>
<»>
(6>
(')
(•>
<»>
(»0)
(11)
(12)
I lil
uppl)>
quoBtlty 0l»)
um cna>)
riM
to
tuto
typo
of
Moot
Troouoat
Ullnu4
I tinil
>f Oq*M
imnilni
CtffcOMOMOO
0)tyott Pinri
lAod (#/D*j)
Motiving
StroM
heiccus rauDM co..
MUSTWI. 1. J '«>
17.0
if
21
wmra
toil*
fw
TTff-
tj7«
0.10
i
P-C-
D
Losoee, Oil,
SklMfot,
tctlfUW Slafea,
SotflMatatlM
99
9,100
Mlmn
UtMry
cumull oca
9*.a
I?
1
CIMSTOW*. «. J.,
(cinwia tv?.
mtd TUAtmvr run)
17
"
2,920
1,500
(1.000)
Clbkiitw tad part
of Cntflvldi TWp.
Utile
'
0.40
DM
0.90
D
CtcSBcB
90
90
ClNMU
CfMh
irwartch Top. votor tniOMt
~ iMl.
e. i. suran. urnim
WDCXS. CIMSTOM. ». J.(
it.
17
2919
» 1,900
OtlMtn
bCMfy,
Holla
90.00
0.90
CblodWtlM,
Bel lor rotor
0.10
0.90
90.»
90.45
P-C-
0
mttiiiuiiis.
9oett*a, snt«
T^l
IS
34,190
DllMft
E» tatty
rniOMt of portloo of vmm
itroM ¦!;. AClMtte City
Bloctrle Co. pavtr plMC
loc«t«d m pmtoM. Coollat
Mtor flow ImIoM vicb All
dlod^orto* Opo'ottat ot
tf>rniltt«ly MO-hol f
cjpoclry teiog i«flla|
proira.
uror co.. tssutim. pa.
n.<
17
291)
[» 114
~
"
Dtlmn
UtMTf,
P*llC
11.00
0.0)
fc..
0.05
"
11.00
11.00
c
¦ooo
•
"
DoImoiw
btuir
OoMttlc "Mto to •Mlelpol
¦fStM.
finmm tree. tnofTtiu,
IK. . uuisrau. r*.
•s.
17
J123
990
"
"
Btlwrn
btMH,
Mile
4. 10
"
0.09
Mltr votor
twnnt
0.09
1.00
1.10
3.30
c
Locom
-
DolMon
btMTJ
Proaaa into to l^m,
dMHttc iuto CO MUclHl
OfOtoa.
OAATT OB
n.
17
om*t am join m
MTKII1T, MOT TV.,
p*.
0.1's.o
17
"
(100,000)
Pert of Doife? Nf.
Sot lull
9*.*-4.0
11.65
0
MMWWMie
DitaZyVv
83
1,160
BOA?
C.40
"
0.15
Bailor ««Ur
tniOmt
0.70
50.OS
90.05
c
Rom
"
"
ttolOMTO
btun
cm cub
94.9
17
pmiumlphi mm*
UATn 00.. OBM QBB
run, KKDU, m.
•*.•-4.0
17
"
"
119,000
P«rt of MoMi
MMlfkli
Cr«
CrMk
19.90
"
~
P-£AL,TC,Jfl,
SO.PU.D.KC,
DC
"
*
Sm tavaohlpo ot borM for
VMto dUeborgoo.
>0CIK.vma. DtVIIIOB.
miina, r&.
•4.0-).0
17
M
7,000
-
-
Mile
"
*
0.20
¦mo
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.09
p
8o4lMnt«tloe
15
40
Cm
Crook
DMItU MO to to MBlelMl
•jriM.
SCOTT MTD CO.. M
cartkita omsioa,
norma. pa.
M.9
17
29
<» 211
'
P*9lle
"
0.M
Hom
0.15
0.09
0.20
PK
¦•tftrolicoelM,
SollMBtOttOO
15
120
OolMtro
btaary
PrlMiy tcaotBMt foclllty
lMtollo9 la 1994.
musiLrau clcctuc co.
wum run.
oormn. pa.
•*.1
17
4911
CD 9)
m
Otlwin
bMivy.
PMU«
4)9.00
"
0.21
knnioi,
ChlorlMtlM,
OHlHntlllllM
0.45
5.40
951.90
954.05
p-t
¦oatrolliotlM,
SodlatKitloa
~
"
Do 1 Mora
Kotaory
OMMtle »uto to Milelpol
•7«tM. TraUMOt of portloc
of «Mto ttraM only
iisut cm
l).t
17
incmmi tw.. pa.
17
-
1,009
(1,000)
I
I
I
Sm Mil*
•4.9-4.0
0.50
0
Sb6hO**iWe»e
15
410
UJUjr
Crook
Asa awniMB *
onsoa od. , ana, n
n.i
17
17 J
2,5*1
Dalvtn
biMiy,
PMlle
O.H
0.*
¦MO
0.15
0.4<
0.50
Q.M
p-<
¦OM
*
Stlwm UdmuHc «hu to atmtclpol
Eataor? ImitM.
-------
OENCfi
rAi IN
WORi
NATION
WATER SUPPLY 1 WASTE DISCHARGE
RE MARKS
(1)
(2>
<»
w
(5)
14)
(7)
(»>
(10)
(il) H (12)
f")
(14)
(15)
(16)
«7)
(Li)
-
Nil*
Mmtj
Soetloa
MC
Co*
14*0
POfvlMlM
or
1440
SUiaOCod
hfalilUi
linii
TovooMpa or
Inm Iirn4
Sovrca
of
Supply
Quantity (HO)
Traatooat
n plow
H to
Uao (MB) II stxaaa
T7H
of
Uaota
Troataaot
lotlaoud
I Maoval
>1 Oman
Corboaocaoaa
Oxygen Doaaai
Load (#/Doy)
Mcaloiaf
Stroon
ioott rtrn 00.,
aaw, pa. 0)
2421
Bo Varan
latoary,
P^lle
16.25
0.35
aiortutloo,
Ploecolatloo,
Sadlmtatloo,
0.23
15.40
0.75 »
14.75
K
Unco flltratloa,
Air floatation,
Slodfa danurtBi
7,743
Diloura
tatoary
Doaootlc waato to aaldpol
ayatos. Tnitaat of portlw
of vooto Olfia only.
cnim cttn
•J. I
IS
unom KIT ALA 00.,
mini, pa.
n.)
IS
1»7
110
-
"
hAlle
"
"
0.50
Sollor watar
tnatoant
-
"
0.50
*
-
-
-
*
"
Dladiarfo to aaltlMl
oyous.
PIUABBMU gomt 00.,
miiu, pa.
•2.4
14
m
(1) M
Oolanro
litauy,
P*llc
0.20
"
0.20
Bollor watar
troataoot
"
0.10
0.30
O.JO
C
¦0D0
*
"
Dalataro
liturr
DobookIc woo to to aolclpal
ayotaa.
¦ nocusnc 00.,
ULUIU, PA.
O.O
!•
UJA
10
~
"
Dtlwtn
btwrr
0.20
*
Mom
"
0.20
"
0.20
P
tat000
»
'
"
Daaootlc waato to oalclptl
ayotaa.
POVmfAlU DflMTUU.
O0OCAL 00., IBIIU,
PA.
O.O
14
2*21
C» 172
~
'
DiImn
btairy,
POkllC
7 20
"
0.05
Qtlorloatloa
o.so
6.45
7.30
P-C
35
43
Dolararo
tatoary
TroocaHt of proeooo waato
oaly.
ItflMT HMD HCUOUK
00., cum, pa.
•1.9
IS
30
U
-
"
Dolararo
Eilwiy
0.30
"
-
Kollor vttir
"
-
0.30
0.30
C
too
-
"
lilaar
puuhhu mcntc co.,
ubihi rum. asma,
PA*
•1.2
14
4411
<» 14]
•
"
kl«n«
IKM17,
Pobllc
104.93
0.15
Scrooalas,
aiorlutiM,
Softening
0.60
104.50
110.00
P-C
taHnHiloa
13
"
tatoary
Tnacaaot of portloo of
vnu itna only.
OBtm, PA.
•O.S
IS
41,654
100,000
(100,000)
Switir, fUrcoa look
tm4 part of
lurrnwJlai araa.
Oetoraro
Crook.
(toaqoahinna
li«ir BuIb)
24.00
"
"
P-GAL,S0,N7?,
DC,PIS,DC
"
"
S.40
JM-
s
WWM|tOfrl»
30
10.1S5
Katoary
tutors m cunt
•0.4
IS
SINCLAIR ttNMUB CO..
man. pa. <*>
•0.4-1.0
!•
2911
(» 1,200
"
*
Dal wan
tllSMJI,
P*Uc
120.00
"
2.25
Oilorlnation,
Bollor (Md
tmtwat
0.25
7.00
115.00
U2.2S
P-C
011-wator
aoparotor
33
3,600
iuiw
¦oak
Crook
mc gov.. amuicj*
Tisoon oivitm,
iocdi nx, p*.
•0.4-0.5
!•
2U1
(3) 1,471
~
"
DllMTt
btMIT.
P*llc
5.60
"
1.05
Filtration,
Cblortoatlcn,
to(tnln|,
pM odjootaaat
0.55
1.65
4.45
5.35
P-C-
0
¦ootrollaotlon,
Mlantatlea
35
1,145
Harcoa
took
Crook
bo> no. PA.
74.4
14
"
1,294
(•.200)
lUrra toak, Lowar
Soo Nil*
•0.8
1.40
0
35
1,420
Oolararo
Katoary
iWMffn 00.,
MiocsKrr, h.j.
-------
GEM
:pal
NFO
PMATiON
WATER SU^^i-T
WASTE
DISCHARGE
REMARKS
(1)
U1
- ±1
W
I (4)
(8)
<»>
(10)
(ID
(12)
f")
(14)
(13)
(14)
U7>
<14>
t-a
mi*
IftWH
tectl
ry SIC
H C«4
1M0
C«Uut
• ToptilKU
1 1M0
Ifitlnitid
Mt fOpalAtla
ItMUttp* or
n Bores S«rrt^
Sowret
of
Supplj
QuaMlty
ota»
TraatMnt
Um (MO)
Plow
to
Stria
trv
of
uaat
TroAbvoc
mi—m
if Oinai
Ctftaacawi
(bqrtaa Oaan
Loarf <#/0ay)
butvloi
Straaa
n.i
n
y
tflLHIKm SOKUtl U4TD
oo., klupovti, on.
73.0
70
"
1,334
14,000
Vtlalagtoo
ftowf tat
Crook
2.70
"
P-CAL.TD.SI,
PtS.DC
8m Hi.
72.2
i
i. i. niwn, ticpcoa
mm, ikwow, ocl.
7).*
20
21
(» 6|e
litMy,
Mlit
24.70
1.80
Plttratloo,
pa tdloant
1.80
24.70
24.30
r-c
SorflOOBtWloa,
ItlBMfclBt
klmn
Eatoary
riaaioaol of portloo of waaco
una oaly. Effloaet 41a-
dMTt** caBttoll*4 for rolaaoi
at low tl4a terlat cartala
tlaoa of tba f«ar.
wlhiiu rata * Ltsn
00., wjkw, on..
73. J
20
I 4911
n
~
"
I Jtlwin
1 EitWfT
4oa.«
-
-
Qi torieatloo,p0
ai|at«it
0.1"
-
404.m
480.00
C
Wo.
-
-
Da lata re
Batoorv
viuiiBTaa. oa. (1)
n.i
31
"
133.»7
(223.000)
UlalMCM. Wmm
CmiI* mi part* of
¦•v Coatla Co»ty
ImIHIm
72.2 aatf
64.0
60.00
>-i-
s
CKMiIyBo
20
83.970
telaroro
lataaiy
Coaotroetlao of aacwndary
tniaat facility bopB lo
1943.
tflLHIKTM U4TXI CD..
V1U11KTCB, ML.
72.2
21
-
133.307
114.000
nbd«M
Sraodyvloo
Crook
23.00
-
-
P-CAL.TC.DC.H.
soi.ns.oc.vs
"
-
-
800 HI
72.2
wmiii tans coo.,
CSV., VUMKICi, ML.
12.2
21
~
133, JOT
19,200
Mutn viUntta
QirlatloA
tlvor
2.30
"
-
P-CAL.TC.N.
SO.PFS.DC
So* (It
72.2
iiTDta mm to.,
mat, on..
72.2
21
-
l,2»
ik.ooo
kbotn Mlalogtao
Halls
" "
3.60
-
A.M.KOI
"
-
So* m.
72.2
ram cten, 1. j.
72.0
21
4,170
14,100
(7.400)
Pinpi Crow
pini of l«|a,
Dppir Pra'i Met,
•Ml Oldmcn'i Twpa.
Ualla
0.90
Kf.K.CA,
PCS
1.00
0
crtb
40
1,430
Dal war*
latoary
Ondar atota ordara to proviso
aaeoniiry tnataaat (1943).
1. 1. mm, Ciwri
pour teas, ran
caon. ¦. j. <*>
71.2
21
2M2
<» 447
Ualla
3.40
Aoratloa,
PUtratloo,
Cfelorlootloo,
I no md pa
kdlautttlca
3.00
0.60
4.73
P-C
¦00a
0
8,480
Oilam
latoafr
data flow laclodaa 9***
Hka m *atar. BfflooM
plpolloa tlietana to rlar
ehaaaal.
ctttrm uvn
70.9
21
1. 1. wan. c—nni ..
won*, bbumd, 1. j}1
HJ
22
2811
(»*.!»
Dilwin
btiMrr,
Ualla
111.53
2.70
Cd^ildloa,
Ptltratloa,
Cklorlutloa
0.45
10.40
103.20
103.31
P-C
Intrilliitlot,
Oil SkUadn*,
Mlattitla, \
Soptlc Tab.
33
110.000
Dalarcn
lattnr
Ifflaaat ploolloa dladkartaa
to rloar eMaoal.
UIB* OMUL
M.I
22
ouruftTn opuatihc 00.,
22
4911
»> 245
Dilwirt
Catwary.
Ualla
203.00
0.80
C»i|al«tloe,
Sodtoaotatloo.
Ptltratloe,
SofcoalM*
CkUdMtlM,
Oostoaral1••cloa
0.13
4.60
197.OS
197.95
C
Soptlc T«ak
Oalarar*
litaiy
AT1AS CMUCAL USDSTltEt
IRC.. HV CASTU. OCL. <>>
M.)
22
2*11
(» Ml
Oalmn
iKwry,
ualla.
r*iic
14.40
1.30
0.10
O.ftO
13.20
10.10
P-C
fUm oqoalltotloo
¦ovtrallsatloe,
Activated Slodfo,
Sodlantattoo,
kptlc Tank a
80
4.733
Utaaxy
roomui w., 1. j.
47.0
2}
"
10,400
(lO.tlO)
Part •( UN? hsH
It* Tw*.
Ualla
"
0.8(
I-CL.A.m.0C,
(9-0.3) P-OC
CAi^vr.fv,
m.C4LM.S.B?
"
1.23
D
C
40
1.870
titwfy
9o4ar atoto ordora to prortia
aocoadavr intaat (1943).
m cAflii mill as.,
WtH CAfTU. ML.
44.0
2 4
"
4. AM
A.MO
tm CmtU
Drills*
Mill*
"
0.M
-
P-eC.CL,fBS
-
-
- B»~ W
I"'
Avisa onr., riu rum,
r» ami, ml.
24
212 t
> 120
*
-
ttolla
-
0.4!
-
•ollar «uir
troitnc
"
-
0.43
0.43
C
-
-
Ailaan
Satoarr
tfisn am., mna
run. m atru. ml.
»>s.«
"
"1
HI
*
~
(tolls
"
1.8
-
Daaarattoo,
S*(tnlt|
0.03
0.70
0.4)
0.32
c
ftfl Soptrator
»
370
Bilaw
|
Baatle vaata to aaldpat
•yataa.
-------
GENEI
RAL IN
FOR
MAT ION
WATfcR
WASTE OISCHARQC
REMARKS
(1)
(21
(4)
<»
<*>
(')
(1)
<•>
(10)
(ID II (12)
{"?
(14)
• (I5>
(16)
U7)
(18)
1*0*
mu
Uluiry
Sactioo
sic
Cota
11*0
C«uv»
Population
or
19*0
Utlaitid
l-opulatlor
TMUhlpi or
Sere* Sira4
iMCI
of
Supply
QunKltji (KD)
TrutMU
U ri«»
H t0
0m (MCD) H strta
rrp*
o(
Utlll
TTilUtnt
tetlMtatf
I Itaovil
>( Osygao
>«Madlfla
CtfbOMCfNI
Uxyfaft Daoan
load (#/Day)
Receiving
Streaa
f*oc.
nocture* oil co.,
BtUMMI CITT. ML.
1}.)
2*
Nil
f" 435
Dslaroo
btutf.
' Ualla
Utaslon,
Floeeolation,
flltratloo,
Chlortiutioa,
Joftniot
0.30
3. XI
ut.oo
2?ft.6d
r-c
la procaaa woata
ntriedM. ATI
Sifiriter,
Septic Toki
iaiwar*
laturr
PEA PATCH ISUUn)
*0.1
27
H
dclawhp rirr powoi t
Linirr co.. on., cm, kl.
*0.9
27
mi
90
"
-
Dal. Eatoary
1M.M
rw
CMorlootloo
See HI la 62.5
04.00 B 104,00
D-C
"
'
-
Otlaun
Catioiy
MUMtl CITT, DCLAUUi
40.1
27
*
1,451
1.700
(1,500)
telMf* City
Drilled
(toll*
"
0.20
-
I-AM.CAL^NS,
PT8.K
-
"
-
0.35
D
CI Bo
40
640
Dalarara
Rataary
OaWUIi-IXUMU GAJUi
U.I
it
1ALCN RITU
54.1
2$
SALfH. H. 1.
>«. Vl.O
21
"
• .Ml
9,000
(9.200)
U1m cad part of
QdstM TWp.
Ualla,
"
1.70
"
F-CAU.DC.AS.SO,
FIS.KC.DC
"
"
" 1
1.30
0
CXD
40
1,730
ftalw
Uotr
IMir MM* M4m to provl*
laeoodary craataoat (1943).
N. 1. HZI1Z 00.. ULCM,
N. J.
3t. 3-3.0
21
2035
600
'
"
S«laB
llw,
h*lle
1.4<
*
0.55
Clorlflutloa,
Cfaloriutioe
"
1.33
0.40 H "
*
'
-
-
UMt* la *r aprey
lrrl|itln< Seaaooal
(%. 4 Sot.)
AJKXM HOCK IMC CLASS GOV.
SAL0I. n. J.
M.VJ.0
21
1221
'» »7
'
"
M»lle
"
"
e.»
SofteaIds
0.10
"
0.20
I 0.10
c
loo.
"
"
Sola*
Urn r
taMtle waoto ead port loo
of coo It o( vtt** to aalclpd
•yita,
CATtfM CUSS VOUCS.
SALOI. K. J.
M.VJ.O
11
Mil
(» 2*o
-
"
**u«
'
"
0.25
Iom
-
0.10
0.1S n 0.07
c
Idw
"
"
Ulm
U«i
laoalaiar co anldMl
•yum.
U£OT ISLAND
35.0
»
listm roirr ¦ hotc ctm
1AT - Bins POUKMIT
44. )
10
------- |