EXECUTIVE
SOLAR ENERGY
FOR
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
RESIDENTIAL HEATING
MAY 1978
U.S. D.O.E.	U.S. D.O.E.	U.S. E.P.fl.
SEATTLE	RICHLAND	SEATTLE

-------
SOLAR ENERGY
FOR PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESIDENTIAL HEATING
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT
An Interagency Report by:
The U.S. Department of Energy
Region X Office of the
Regional Representative
The U.S. Department of Energy
Richland, Washington Operations
Office, and
The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region X Office
May 1978


-------
This Executive Summary is a condensation of a technical report that examines climatic,
technical, economic, legal, institutional, and environmental issues related to development of solar
energy for residential space and water heating applications in the Pacific Northwest.* The report
provides objective information for those considering installing a solar system.
AVAILABLE SOLAR ENERGY IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST
There is a wide variety of opinion regarding the practicality of solar heating in (for example) Seattle
which has a national reputation for dark, rainy winters. Some people believe solar heating is more
practical in Spokane or Boise where there is more winter sun. That is not correct.
To illustrate this point, a comparison of winter heating requirements and available solar energy for
various Northwest and selected other locations is shown in Table I on the next page.
'Throughout this report, "Pacific Northwest" and "Northwest" are used to indicate the geographical area
comprising the States of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.

-------
SOLAR RADIATION AND HEATING DEGREE-DAY
COMPARISON FOR VARIOUS NORTHWEST AND
SELECTED OTHER LOCATIONS
Table I
(A) (B)	(C=A/B)
Average Daily Average Monthly	Ratio of Solar Energy
Solar Radiation Heating Degree—	Received to Heating
Received During Days During	Degree—Days During
Location the Heating Season* the Heating Season** the Heating Season***
Richland, WA
720
690
1.04
Seattle, WA
520
660
0.79
Spokane, WA
660
920
0.72
Astoria, OR
560
610
0.92
Corvallis, OR
530
610
0.88
Klamath Falls, OR
810
840
0.96
Medford, OR
750
700
1.07
Boise, ID
810
820
0.99
Twin Falls, ID
840
860
0.98
Great Falls, MT
770
1,000
0.77
Boston, MA
680
800
0.85
Schenectady, NY
640
950
0.67
Chicago, IL
530
880
0.60
Madison, WI
710
1,100
0.64
~Average daily solar radiation (Btu/ft2 ) rounded to two significant digits, for the months of October through
March.
~~Heating degree—days (base 65°F) rounded to two significant digits, for the months of October through March.
Heating degree—days are a measure of temperature as it affects energy demand for space heating. For any one
day, it is equivalent to the difference between the mean temperature for the day and 65 F. The greater the
number of degree—days, the greater the heating demand.
~ ~~This ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of solar radiation received, column (A), by the heating degree
days, column (B). For Richland, Washington, for example, C=A/B=ggQ=1.04. The higher the number, the better
the location for solar heating.
-1-

-------
In summary, the following are conclusions of the report concerning available solar energy in the
Pacific Northwest:
•	Based only on climatic factors, the attractiveness of solar space heating is relatively uniform
throughout the Northwest. This uniformity is due to two related conditions. West of the
Cascade Mountains, it is cloudier, but more temperate; east of the Cascades, there is more
available solar radiation, but the winters are colder. These conditions roughly balance each
other. The Richland, Washington area and the Medford, Oregon area appear to be the most
attractive areas for solar heating applications.
•	Based on climatic factors, the attractiveness of solar space heating is better for all Northwest
locations studied than for a variety of other representative Northern U.S. locations surveyed:
Chicago, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin; Schenectady, New York; and Great Falls, Montana.
•	Based on a consideration of available solar radiation, solar water heating, which is not usually
affected by outside air temperatures, appears to be more attractive in clear-sky eastern portions
of the region.
•	Solar collection in Northwest latitudes is improved significantly during winter months by tilting
collector surfaces 45° to 60° above horizontal, facing south. Available solar energy on such
inclined south-facing surfaces is approximately twice that of horizontal surfaces during
November, December, and January.
TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The systems studied in this report include active and passive space and water heating applications as
well as solar heating for swimming pools.
Passive solar space heating systems collect energy through direct heat gain without use of pumps,
fans, or other mechanical equipment. In effect, the building itself becomes a live-in solar collector.
Considerable research on passive space heating systems suitable for the Northwest has been
performed at the University of Oregon. Initial results are impressive, suggesting that a properly
designed passive system can perform as well as or better than active* systems, although there is no
§imple or set way to calculate "years-to-break-even" because of the wide number of variables in
passive solar system design.
~An active solar system is one that uses coliectors, pumps, piping, fans, and other mechanical equipment to move
the heat collected.
-2-

-------
For example, the performance of a well-insulated house with a 12-inch thick concrete thermal
storage wall equal in area to 1/2 the house floor area has been computer simulated for different
cities in the Northwest. The results are as follows:
Percent Space Heating
City	Supplied by Passive Solar
Eugene, OR	59
Medford, OR	71
Seattle, WA	60
Spokane, WA	61
Boise, ID	71
To estimate the "years-to-break-even" for an active solar heating system:
1)	Determine the cost of conventional heating energy by calling your utility or
2)	Determine the approximate installed cost and collector area of the
are considering either from a solar system company estimate or a
estimating guide.
3)	Divide the estimated solar system cost by the number of square feet of solar collector area.
4)	If you use gas or oil, convert to an equivalent electricity price using Table II below.
TABLE II
Equivalent Energy Costs
Oil,*
Natural Gas,*
Electricity,
$/gal
$/therm
$/kwh
0.28
0.23
0.01
0.43
0.35
0.015
0.57
0.47
0.02
0.71
0.59
0.025
0.85
0.70
0.03
1.00
0.82
0.035
1.14
0.94
0.04
1.28
1.05
0.045
1.42
1.17
0.05
5) Select the appropriate Figure (I, II, III, or IV below) representing the city nearest to your
home,** draw a vertical line from your equivalent electricity cost to the estimated solar
system cost curve, and from that point draw a horizontal line over to the vertical axis. This
is the approximate "years-to-break-even" for an active solar heating system in your area.
~Assumes average furnace efficiency.
**For a more accurate result if you are not located near any of these cities, refer to the full technical report which
includes charts for 12 different Northwest locations.
heating fuel dealer.
solar system you
reliable published
-3-

-------
NEW CONSTRUCTION
COST OF ELECTRI CITY cents/kWh
This example illustrates how to find estimated "years-to-break-even" periods. Assume that you are
buying oil at $.57 per gallon, and that you have received a quote for an active solar system of $20
per square foot of collector. The electricity price equivalent (from Table II) is H per kwh. The
vertical dotted line is drawn up from the 2^/kwh and the horizontal line shows that it would take
slightly less than 13 years to "break even", that is, it would take 13 years for the system to pay for
itself.
-4-

-------
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
BOISE, ID
HOT WATER SYSTEM
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
COST OF ELECTRICITYcents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
HOT WATER AND HEATING SYSTEM
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
NEW CONSTRUCTION
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/KWH
FIGURE I Economic Analysis for Boise, ID

-------
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
CORVALLIS, OR
HOT WATER SYSTEM
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
NEW CONSTRUCTION
COST OF ELECTRICITYcents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
HOT WATER AND HEATING SYSTEM
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
FIGURE II Economic Analysis for Corvallis, OR
—6—

-------
SEATTLE, WA
HOT WATER SYSTEM
NEW CONSTRUCTION
1 2 3 4 5
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
14
12
10
5
ct
m
e
un
CtL
s
>
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
X
_L
1 2 3 4 5
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
HOT WATER AND HEATING SYSTEM
NEW CONSTRUCTION
5
>
UJ
s
az
ca
6

ADDED TO
-
EXISTING STRUCTURE
-
\$io/ft2c
.

¦

-,1	
1 i 1 i
1 2 3 4 5
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
1 2 3 4 5
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
FIGURE III Economic Analysis of Seattle, WA
7

-------
14 _
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
14 -
12 -
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0 -
SPOKANE, WA
HOT WATER SYSTEM
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
NEW CONSTRUCTION
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY centslkWh
HOT WATER AND HEATING SYSTEM
ADDED TO
EXISTING STRUCTURE
NEW CONSTRUCTION
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
COST OF ELECTRICITY cents/kWh
FIGURE IV Economic Analysis of Spokane, WA

-------
In summary, the following are major conclusions of the report concerning Northwest solar
economics:
•	Passive solar heating can often be integrated into new buildings as part of the architecture at
minimal additional cost. According to a University of Oregon study, some passive systems can
meet 60 to 70 percent of a residence's space heating needs in the Northwest. Passive systems can
be, dependent upon the design used, the most cost effective application of solar heating.
•	Currently, the most effective residential application of active solar heating in the Northwest is a
swimming pool heater. Typical "years-to-break-even" periods for solar swimming pool heaters
are less than ten years.
•	Currently, active solar space and water heating systems are less cost effective than the other
solar applications studied. Typical payback periods for active solar space and water heaters are
longer than ten years.
•	It appears that the solar/heat pump combined cycle studied by the Northwest Energy Policy
Project group has typical "years-to-break-even" periods longer than 15 years.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF SOLAR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT
There are various private and public law doctrines which may affect a solar user's right to sunlight,
and which may have an effect on the widespread use of solar energy. Briefly:
•	In general, present law does not adequately protect access to sunlight for users of solar energy.
•	Under present law, restrictive covenants can be a primary method for protecting access to
sunlight for new real estate developments. However, restrictive covenants do not usually provide
adequate protection for solar energy users in areas that are already developed.
•	The adoption of a "solar skyspace easement" law, under which easements negotiated between
private parties could be recorded in a standard format, would appear to offer improved legal
protection for many solar energy users in developed areas.
•	The use of restrictive covenants and solar skyspace easements can offer increased legal
protection for many users of solar energy while minimizing the need for modification of the
present legal system.
—

-------
• Any major modifications in the legal system, such as allocation of sunlight under the prior
appropriation system currently used for water allocation in the Western States, or under some
form of permit procedure, must be carefully considered to determine whether the resulting
increase in regulation can effectively solve the problems presented without creating serious
negative effects, such as over-restriction of adjacent property.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
There are minor potential air, water, solid waste, and health impacts of widespread solar
development. Both positive effects (reduced air and water emissions from conventional energy
sources) and negative effects (disposal of toxic fluids, increased glare, potential contamination of
potable water systems) exist.
Air pollution was also found to affect the availability of received solar radiation. Thus, air pollution
could impair the performance of solar heating systems.
The full report describes all the above issues in more detail. The report may be reviewed at the
Public Reading Area, U.S. Department of Energy, Room 1902, Federal Building, 915 2nd Avenue,
Seattle, Washington. A limited number of copies are available for distribution to interested parties.
-10-

-------