SUPERFUND
Records Of Decision
Update
From: Hazardous Site Control Division
To: EPA Regional Offices
May 28, 1985
INTRODUCTION
To date, over 60 Records of
Decision (RODs) have been
signed, approving a wide variety
of remedial activities across the
country. As an increasing
number of sites move through
the remedial pipeline, a growing
number of RODs will be approv-
ed by all 10 Regions and Head-
quarters. Many of you are work-
ing on RODs with similar
issues; issues that are being
discussed in other Regions, as
well as issues that have been
addressed in previously signed
RODs. This Records of Deci-
sion Update has been designed
to share information, and most
importantly, to identify informa-
tion contacts, to ease the
preparation of upcoming RODs.
Topics to be discussed in each
issue will include:
•	A summary of all signed
RODs, focusing on the deci-
sion itself, important issues,
and Regional and Head-
quarters contacts.
•	A list of upcoming RODs, also
describing the important
issues to be addressed and in-
formation contacts.
•	Special topics of interest
such as RCRA policy, cleanup
criteria, levels of risk, etc.
•	Other topics as suggested.
We hope you will find this first
issue helpful and informative. If
you have any questions or sug-
gestions to make it more useful
to you, please contact Lori De
Rose (FTS-382-3304). The next
issue will be distributed in mid-
June.
ROD SUMMARIES
Each issue of the Records of
Decision Update will begin with
a concise summary of recently
approved RODs. The summary
will focus on the salient points
of each decision and will
highlight important issues,
specific policy implications,
and other points of interest. The
name of a contact person at
both the Region and Head-
quarters will be provided in case
more detailed information is
needed. This first issue con-
tains summaries of 9 past RODs
(FY 1983-1984) that addressed
important technical and policy
questions. The next issue will
summarize an additional group
of past RODs (FY 1982 through
early FY 1985) that included
similarly important decisions.
PIJAK FARM, REGION II,
NEW JERSEY
(Approved 9/30/84 — Same deci-
sion, decision date, and issues
apply to the Spence site).
Description:
•Specialty and research
chemicals, in drums and free-
flowing liquids, were dumped
into a natural ditch and were
later covered with soil on this
87-acre site.
Decision:
•	First operable unit — removal
and offsite disposal of all
drums, lab packs, and visibly
contaminated soils to a RCRA
facility.
Issues:
•	Principal contaminants found
onsite are not priority
pollutants or Appendix C
wastes; however, they may
still present a threat to public
health and the environment.
Risk levels are unknown for
these contaminants. OERR
and ORD/OHEA (Office of
Health and Environmental
Assessment) will need to pro-
vide risk guidance for second
operable unit.
Contact:
•	Region II — Don Lynch
FTS-264-8216
•	Headquarters — Jim
Spatarella
FTS-382-7995
LONE PINE LANDFILL,
REGION II, NEW JERSEY
(Approved 9/28/84)
Description:
•45-acre landfill including
municipal and septage
wastes, 17,000 drums, and
several million gallons of bulk
liquid chemicals.
Decision:
•	First operable unit — installa-
tion of a slurry wall and multi-
layer surface seal. Leachate
collection and treatment, and
maintenance of reverse
hydraulic gradient.
Issues:
•	Offsite plume was not ad-
dressed. A supplemental ROD
will be prepared once the off-
site hydrogeologic investiga-
tion is completed.
Contact:
•	Region II — Joel Singerman
FTS-264-9589

-------
•	Headquarters — John
Kingscott
FTS-382-7996
HUDSON RIVER PCB,
REGION IIf NEW YORK
(Approved 9/25/84)
Description:
•	PCB contamination found in
submerged sediment hot
spots, exposed shoreline
deposits, dredge spoils on
banks, and in estuary sedi-
ments over a 50-mile stretch
of the Hudson River.
Decision:
•	Interim measure — in-place
containment of remnant
shoreline deposits using soil
cover. State will conduct a
dredging demonstration pro-
gram gsing funds from Sec-
tion 116 of the Clean Water
Act.
Issues:
•	The interim measure did not
meet all of the requirements
of TSCA because it included
containing PCBs above 50
ppm. However, the adverse
environmental impact of
removal outweighed the bene-
fits.
•	The primary route of exposure
is through consumption of
PCB contaminated fish.
Dredging to remove con-
taminated sediments was the
primary long-term solution
considered. It was rejected
due to the severe damage it
may have caused to the river
ecosystem. Information from
the demonstration dredging
program will be reviewed to
decide whether a cost-effec-
tive future remedy is
available.
Contact:
•	Region II — Rob Raab
FTS-264-1919
•	Headquarters — Jim
Spatarella
FTS-382-7995
KRYSOWATY FARM,
REGION II, NEW JERSEY
(Approved 9/20/84)
Description:
•	Waste disposal site including
about 500 drums of paint and
dye wastes, bulk waste, sol-
vents, and waste sludge.
Decision:
•	Excavate and dispose of con-
taminated soils and wastes at
an off site facility approved for
PCBs.
•	A permanent alternative water
supply will be provided to po-
tentially affected residences.
Issues:
•	Although there is no proven
threat to nearby residential
wells, it is cheaper to provide
public water than to conduct
an expensive monitoring pro-
gram. Fractured bedrock con-
ditions would have required
extensive monitoring to de-
tect offsite migration.
•	Onsite remedies were re-
jected due to locational fac-
tors. Site was inconsistent
with TSCA requirements for
disposal of PCB wastes.
Contacts:
•	Region II — John Czapror
FTS-264-8667
•Headquarters — John
Kingscott
FTS-382-7996
MATTHEWS ELEC-
TROPLATING, REGION
III, VIRGINIA
(Approved 6/2/83)
Description:
•	Electroplating facility's on-
site well was heavily con-
taminated with hexavalent
chromium. Ten residential
wells also had chromium con-
tamination.
Decision:
•	Provide municipal water ser-
vice to the affected neighbor-
hood.
Issues:
•	County requested a modifica-
tion to the proposed design,
including a larger water pipe
size and additional facilities
to accommodate future
growth. These modifications
were funded by the county.
This is a betterment issue and
requires close coordination
with Headquarters staff.
Contact:
•	Region III — Walt Graham
FTS-597-9387
•	Headquarters — Lisa Wood-
son
FTS-475-8246
BERLIN AND FARRO
LIQUID INCINERATION,
REGION V, MICHIGAN
(Approved 2/29/84)
Description:
•	Liquid waste incinerator site
included scattered waste in
buried drums, open lagoons,
and underground tanks.
Decision:
•	Excavate and dispose of
sludge, crushed drums, liquid
wastes, and visibly contami-
nated soil at a RCRA facility.
Solids will be landfilled, and li-
quids will be incinerated.
•	Additional sampling will be
performed to determine if
wastes have migrated below
visibly contaminated areas.
Issues:
•This was the first time that
locational criteria not specifi-
cally spelled out in the RCRA.
regulations were used in the^
selection of a remedy. Hydro-
geologic concerns made this
additional evaluation neces-
sary.
•	Incineration of wastes con-
taining both organics and
PCBs was considered, al-
though it was not required by
EPA regulations. The increas-
ed costs of incineration were
offset by improved long-term
environmental protection.
Contact:
•	Region V — Greg Kulma
FTS-886-3010
•	Headquarters — Kitty Taimi
FTS-382-2449
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN
HILLS, REGION V,
MINNESOTA
(Approved 9/19/83)
Description:
•	Municipal drinking water wells
are contaminated with volatile
organic solvents.
Decision:

-------
•	IRM action. Treatment of mu-
nicipal wells with granular act-
ivated carbon (GAC) to meet
peak summertime demands.
Issues:
•	A hydraulic connection to a
small private water system of
questionable quality was re-
jected in favor of hooking into
a larger, more reliable water
system.
Contact:
•	Region V — Karen Waldvogel
FTS-886-9292
•	Headquarters — Kitty Taimi
FTS-382-2449
OUTBOARD MARINE
CORPORATION (OMC),
REGION Vf ILLINOIS
(Approved 5/14/84)
Description:
•	Outboard motor manufactur-
ing plant on Lake Michigan
discharged PCBs, contamina-
ting sediments in Waukegan
Harbor and a tributary to Lake
Michigan as well as onsite
soils.
Decision:
•	Fund balancing used in the
selection of the recommended
alternative.
•	Offsite disposal of PCB-
contaminated hot-spots and
onsite containment of the
moderately contaminated ma-
terials.
Issues:
•	To meet the requirements of
TSCA, PCB-contaminated ma-
terial would have to be ex-
cavated and disposed of off-
site. This alternative cost more
than $75 million. The Fund Bal-
ancing provisions of CERCLA
and the NCP were used to se-
lect an option that is less ex-
pensive and only slightly less
reliable than the TSCA alter-
native.
Contact:
•	Region V — Jack Braun
FTS-886-4784
•	Headquarters — Nancy Willis
FTS-382-2347
REILLY TAR, REGION V,
MINNESOTA
(Approved 6/6/84)
Description:
• Creosote-bearing waste pollu-
ted the land surface and four
underlying aquifers. Pollut-
ants consisted primarily of
polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAHs) and related
coal tar derivatives. The sur-
ficial aquifer and two other
aquifers used as primary
drinking aquifers are con-
taminated.
Decision:
•	Groundwater treatment of the
primary drinking water aquifer
at one of St. Louis Park's wells
by granular activated carbon to
restore drinking water quality
and help prevent spread of
contamination.
Issues:
•	Used the "Ambient Water
Quality Criteria for PAH" to
target a health risk of 10 - 6 for
the sum of carcinogenic PAH.
Two technologies — ozone
and carbon — were evaluated.
Carbon was selected since it
could achieve the target health
risk of 10-6 within the same
cost range. The target health
risk of 10 - 6 was selected after
reviewing a range of risks
associated with treating con-
taminated groundwater for
public consumption. The level
was not selected to satisfy the
groundwater protection re-
quirements of RCRA Part 264.
•	An operational target of 280
mg/L total PAH (based on a
ratio of carcinogens to total
PAH calculated using site
data) was selected due to the
difficulty in monitoring for low
levels of carcinogenic PAH.
Contact:
•	Region V — Paul Bitter
FTS-886-7271
•	Headquarters — Kitty Taimi
FTS-382-2449
REMEDIAL
PROGRAM TARGET
PROJECTS
The attached chart lists RODs
scheduled for completion dur-
ing FY 1985. The threats or pro-
blems presented at the sites are
noted, as are the important
issues involved in each ROD.
Regional and Headquarters
contacts are also presented for
your use.

-------
REMEDIAL PROGRAM TARGET PROJECTS
FY 1985
Reaion
Site/State
Candidate
for
Detonation
Threat or
Problem
Issues
Regional
Contact
Headquarters
Contact
I
Baird & Maguire Inc.
MA
yes
Pesticides in
soils and ground
water
Alternate
concentration
level (ACL)
Bob Shatten
223-1722
Steve Hooper
475-6689

Beacon Heights L/F,
CT
yes 4/12
Landfill ieachate
in ground water
Treating
ground
water in
fractured
bedrock
Rich Cavagnero
223-1947
Steve Hooper
475-6689

Cannon Engr-
Plymouth, MA
yes
Surface tanks &
soils
—
Greg Roscoe
223-5911
Bill Kaschak
382-2348

Charles George
L/F, MA
yes 3/8
Landfill Ieachate
in ground water
RCRA
capping
Rich Leighton
223-1946
Bill Kaschak
382-2348

Groveland Wells, MA
no
Solvents in
ground water
ACL
Jim Ciriello
223-1946
Steve Hooper
475-6689

Hocomonco Pond, MA
yes
Creosote in soil,
ground water
ACL
Jim Ciriello
223-1946
Steve Hooper
475-6689

McKin Company, ME
yes 4/12
Volatiles in GW
ACL
Dave Webster
223-4909
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Nyanza Chemical, MA
yes 4/12
Metal sludges
ACL/on-site
RCRA
facility
Rich Cavagnero
223-1947
Bill Kaschak
382-2348

Plclllo Farm Site, Rl
yes 4/12
Organics in soil
& ground water
ACL
Dan Conklin
223-1928
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Western Sand &
Gravel, Rl
(Enforcement)
no 4/12
Volatiles and PAHs
in ground water
— —
Susan Patz
223-4923
Debbie Dalton
382-7788
II
Llparl Landfill, NJ
yes
Leachate
from landfill
Leachate
collection
and disposal
Sal Badalamenti
264-1873
John Kingscott
382-7996

Marathon Battery, NJ
possible
Cd contamination of
wetlands & river
Wetlands, env.
threat, no public
health threat
Joel Singerman
264-9589
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995 -

Olean Well Field, NJ
yes
TCE contamination
of ground water
Cleanup
levels
Pam Tames
264-2646
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Price Landfill, NJ
(enforcement)
no
VOCs, etc. in
ground water
Could be
settlement-
now going
NDD
Bob McKnight
264-7509
Hamid Saebfar
382-4839

Sinclair Refinery, NJ
yes
VOCs, etc. in
soil, ground
water
Split site,
cleanup
levels
Joel
Singerman
264-9589
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Swope Oil. NJ
yes
PCBs in soil
GW effect of site
on local
wells
Don Lynch
264-8216
John Kingscott
382-7996

Wide Beach, NJ
yes
PCBs in soil
Little
known
Joel
Singerman
264-9589
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

York Oil, NJ
yes
PCBs in soil
Possible bio
treatment
Bob Howe
264-1375
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Bog Creek Farm, NJ
yes
Volatiles
Seriousness
of health
threat—
potential
for inplace
treatment
Eric Swartz
264-1253
John Kingscott
382-7996

Burnt Fly Bog, NJ
no
Lead/PCBs in
soil/sediment
Excavation/no
containment
John Czaror
264-8667
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Combe Fill North, NJ
yes
Ground water
contamination
by VOCs
Probably
won't make
FY 85
Rich Schwartz
264-1252
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Gems Landfill, NJ
yes
Groundwater
contact with
landfill
GW cleanup-
feasibility of
RCRA cap
Ed Putnam
264-1873
John Kingscott
382-7996

-------
REMEDIAL PROGRAM TARGET PROJECTS
FY 1985 (Cont'd)
Candidate
for Threat or	Regional	Headquarters
Region	Site/State	Delegation	Problem	Issues	Contact	Contact

Glen Ridge Radiation,
NJ
no
Low-level
radiation
Off-site
disposal
location
Doug Johnson
264-8475
John Kingscott
382-7996

Goose Farm, NJ
yes
Ground water
and soil con-
tamination by
VOCs/exotics
Heavy PRP
involvement
Don Lynch
264-8216
Bob Quinn/
Jim Spatarella
382-7995

Helen Kramer L/F, NJ
yes
Ground water
contact with
landfill
—
Ed Putnam
264-1873
John Kingscott
382-7996
III
Douglasville, PA
yes 4/12
Waste oil located
in flood plain
Active
facility
still as
source
Rich Zambito
597-3535
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

Drake Chemical, PA
yes
Lagoons and GW
contamination
Flood plain,
adjacent
facility, RA
coordination
Bill Hagel
597-3161
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

Harvey-Knott, DE
yes
GW contamination,
drum
disposal
State
participation,
wetland assess-
ment, PCBs
Rich Zambito
597-3535
Lisa Woodson
475-8246

Lansdowne Radia-
tion, PA
possible
House contami-
nated with radio-
active materials
Relocation
Walt Graham
597-9387
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

McAdoo Associates,
PA
no
Soils contami-
nation
Fund
balancing;
partial
removal vs.
capping
due to
subsidence
threat
Dan Diliullio
597-3435
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

Moyers Landfill, PA
yes
LF with contami-
nated leachate
Gas
collection
for 20
years wanted
by PRP
Stephanie del Re
597-0517
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

Sand Gravel & Stone,
MD
yes
Soil coniamination,
shallow ground
water contamination
Complex
hydro-
geological
system
Roy Shrock
597-0913
Lisa Woodson
475-8246

Taylor Borough, PA
yes 4/12
Drum disposal
on top of LF,
minimal soil
contamination
Clean-up
criteria if
landfill is closed
by RCRA. Soils
around drum
disposal.
Joe Dugandzic
597-9023
Lisa Woodson
475-8246
IV
Miami Drum/
Biscayne Aquifier, FL
no
Regional ground
water contami-
nation
Plume is
no longer
identified with
any site. The
extra aquifer
is contaminated
Jim Orban
257-2930
Lisa Woodson
475-8246

NW 58th Street. FL
yes
Municipal land-
fill w/some
hazardous waste
Biscayne
aquifier. Accep-
tability of county
closure plan
Jim Orban
257-2930
Linda
Boornazian
382-7997

Whitehouse Waste
Oil, FL
yes 4/12
Soils, GWw/
organics and
metals
Length of GW
treatment
Jack Snider
257-2930
Ed Barth
382-7998

-------
REMEDIAL
PROGRAM TARGET PROJECTS
FY 1985 (Cont'd)
Region Site/State
Candidate
lor
Deleoation
Threat or
Problem
Issues
Regional
Contact
Headquarters
Contact
V Acme Solvent, IL
(1st Operable Unit)
yes
(delegated)
Contaminated
soils and GW
(metals)
Oelisting
Paul Bitter
Dave Favero
886-4742
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998
Arcanum Iron, OH
likely
Soil, ground
water contami-
nation with
lead & acid
No major
issues
Allen Wojtas
886-6941
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Charlevoix Municipal,
Ml
yes 4/12
Ground water
contamination
limited threat
(IRM to
provide
alternate water
supply.)
Maybe no action
ROD which will
allow contamina-
tion plume into
Lake Michigan
Jack Kratzmeyer
353-6449
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Fields Brook, OH
likely
Stream sedi-
ments contami-
nated with PCBs,
organics, heavy
metals
—	Disposal
facility for
PCBs
—	95% removal
as
"deminimus"
—	High en-
forcement
Allen Wojtas
886-6941
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Kummer L/F, MN
(1st Operable Unit)
yes
(delegated)
Water supply
—
Allen Wojtas
886-6941
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
likely
PCB contaminated
soils, ponds,
ground water
(extent unknown)
-	PCBs;
-	High
enforcement
Jay Plucinski
353-6316
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
LeHillier, MN
likely
Ground water
contamination
Municipal sup-
ply in place;
cannot be used
because of local
issues. Need to
force the state to
resolve.
Fred Bartman
353-6083
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Liquid Disposal, Ml
(1st Operable Unit)
yes
Soils, GW
contamination
Probably
won't make
'85
John Tanaka
353-9081
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998
Main St, IN
Yes
Public water
supply contaminated
w/solvents
No major
issues
Jonas Dikinis
886-7572
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Mid-State, Wl
yes
Contaminated
leachate, existing
cap inadequate
—
Bev Kush
886-6945
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
New Brighton, MN
(Operable Unit)
yes
Water supply,
TCE in
ground water
—
Karen
Waldvogel
886-9292
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998
Northernaire, Ml
(1st Operable Unit)
yes
Contaminated
soils and GW
Clean-up
levels
Mary Elaine
Gustafson
886-6144
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998
Old Mill, OH
yes 4/12
Contaminated
soil and
ground water
ACL; length
of time to
treat GW
Mary Tyson
886-3006
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
OMC, IL
no
Harbor sediments
contaminated
with PCBs
PCBs
site access
Dan Caplice
886-0397
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
Reilly Tar, MN
no
Ground water
contamination
by PAHs
Extent of
remedy, ACL
Paul Bitter
886-3007
Kitty Taimi
382-2449
Ed Barth
382-7998

-------
REMEDIAL PROGRAM TARGET PROJECTS



FY 1985 (Cont'd)


Region
Site/State
Candidate
for
Delegation
Threat or
Problem
Issues
Regional
Contact
Headquarters
Contact

Schmalz Dump, Wl
likely
PCB contami-
nation of
soil, pond
sediments
PCBs
Jim Knoy
886-0622
Carol Lindsay
475-6704

Verona Wellfield, Ml
likely
Contaminated
well field
WQStobe
met for
acetone during
the first month
of operation
Jack
Kratzmeyer
353-6449
Carol Lindsay
475-6704

Waucorda Sand, IL
likely
Ground water
contamination
State fund
for O&M
Long term O&M
Cindy Nolan
886-0440
Carol Lindsay
475-6704
VI
Bayou Bonfouca, LA
yes 4/12
Creosote waste
piles landfill/
drums
Soil cleanup
level
Don Porter
729-9712
Randy
Kaltrieder
382-2448

Cecil Lindsey, AR
yes 4/12
Low level
organics in
soil
No action vs.
limited action
Joe Cravens
729-9737
Randy
Kaltrieder
382-2448

Cleve Reber, LA
yes 4/12
Landfill/drums
with organics
Extent of
removal, if any
Steve Gilrein
729-2737
Randy
Kaltrieder
382-2448

Crystal Chemical, TX
no
Soils w/arsenic
Soil clean-
up levels
Steve Gilrein
729-9717
Ed Barth
382-7998

Triangle Chemical. TX
yes 3/8
Soils with
arsenic,
metals
ACL
Don Williams
729-9713
Ed Barth
382-7998
VII
Ellisville Sites, MO
(Rosalie & Callahan)
yes 4/12
Drums &
contaminated
soils
Offsite
disposal
Bob Feild
758-3931
John Kingscott
382-7996
VIII
Denver Radium Site,
CO
yes 6/25
Radioactive
contamination
(soils &
structures)
Acceptable
disposal
facility
John Brink
564-1525
Randy
Kaltrieder
382-2448

Woodbury Chemical,
CO
yes 3/8
Soils with
pesticides
Extent of
soil removal
treatment vs.
onsite closure
WaltSandza
564-1531
Randy
Kaltrieder
382-2448
IX
Celtor Chemical, CA
yes
Heavy metals
in soil
How clean
for soils
Nick Morgan
454-8918
Steve Hooper
475-6689

Del Norte. CA
yes
Pesticides in
soil, ground
water
ACL
Michele Dermer
454-8144
Steve Hooper
475-6689

Jibboom Junkyard.
CA
yes 3/8
PCBs, metals
in soil
Extent of
soil excavation
Nick Morgan
454-8918
Steve Hooper
475-6689
X
United Chrome, OR
yes
Hex-chromium
in soil, ground
water
ACL
John Meyer
399-1271
Steve Hooper
475-6689

-------