ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ROCKY MOUNTAIN-PRAIRIE REGION
REGION VIII
RED RIVER OF THE
NORTH BASIN
DECEMBER 4, 1972
-------
RED glVfll
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT SECTION
Narrative A
Basin Load Summary B
Planned Accomplishments C
Point Source Loads § Locations D
Ambient W.Q. Status E
Tactical Solutions F
Point Source Reductions Required G
-------
SECTION A
Narrative
-------
vy
I ' -TV \N
6 >rA ^-'"rj
—' s 1 \ r,;j.>i,iTon* » ^. •— » _ _
!r
\
UC»T .. ^\ . 1 •
100
/%._'*kw
na
^-1—•*-
v.- . iq? ^-,VA vui u7
)i* * im /•" 101 '.\ v\ I
Wr.5i- V--K""
"'¦'*J \*3^
' 97
' '»:)&--/ ,
—r v ¦/ -us i
¦\
'v.
113.,
*U.
', Vs.
r
"9 *" '-r;/^
¦Y il/Ar'-
0
-<-'82 \ 00 H"
81 / v
Js\V
V.< ^ si*-N \V\ .. b7 \y J" I • M
v,-^ I (f,s . ¦ •.... r -I
'"(:..,..l|..ih
rrtr'rt^y ¦ vM
>\ 0 Y\ <,'.t-- f ^ ~ - y-'
\ V *0^. V .c- IC ' i"Vf .
-
\'l ' • W-C-A', /»
C. r. '©"•A
1 • I IX V*J*', w vui
-------
RED RIVER - FIGURE 9
I. Priority Area Identification
The Red River of the North River Basin encompasses portions
of the States of North Dakota, Iowa and Minnesota and the Dominion
of Canada. The area of primary effort for Region VIII in this
Accomplishment Plan falls entirely within the State of North Dakota.
Just considering the mainstem of the Red River which borders Minnesota
and North Dakota, and three major tributaries (Red Lake River in
Minnesota, and the Sheyenne and Park Rivers in North Dakota), approxi-
mately 955 river miles are traversed. Seven hundred and eighty-two of
these miles fall under North Dakota's jurisdiction. The entire basin
covers approximately 38,000 square miles.
II. Problem Assessment
The Red River Basin involves three States, two EPA Regional
Jurisdictions, and drains into Canada. Consequently, the problem
includes institutional constraints and relations on an International,
interstate, and inter-regional level. As a result, the effort is
fragmented and the water pollution problem is not addressed with the
full amount of resources that are available.
a. Although the North Dakota population is relatively small,
247,000 people in 1970, the limited availability of quality
water supplies, the general widespread nature of the pollution
problem and the international aspects combine to make this an
important priority area.
b. Of the 782 river miles in North Dakota, 280 are estimated
to be out of compliance with North Dakota's water quality standards
some time during the water year.
c. The major industrial pollution in this basin results from
the operations of sugar beet mills.
d. In 1965 an Enforcement Conference was convened in order to
address the water quality problems in the Red River. The
Conference made several recommendations regarding large municipal
and industrial dischargers, including the four sugar beet mills.
The recommendations of this Conference as they relate to North
Dakota are reflected in this Basin Accomplishment Plan.
-------
2
e. The North Dakota standards and implementation schedule are
adequate. However, there is a problem of differing standards at
the Minnesota-North Dakota state line that must be resolved.
f. All major waste sources are presently under a schedule of
improvement and compliance so the main effort is directed
toward seeing that the schedules are maintained. However, due
to the diversity or wastes sources and the levels of nutrient
loadings, full compliance with water quality standards is not
assured.
g. Water quality surveys and plant effluent and discharge point
stream monitoring will be carried out to determine if additional
nutrient removal by point sources is required. Otherwise, no
additional treatment needs are identified at this time.
Another significant problem is the discharging of waste-
water effluent under ice thus causing an oxygen depletion. In
North Dakota, all the municipal systems except for Fargo, hold
their effluent through the winter and discharge during the Spring
and Fall months. Fargo is in the process of constructing a 580-
acre lagoon which will provide storage of its effluent through
the winter. American Crystal Sugar at Drayton is constructing
a recycling unit whereby the majority of its effluent will not
reach the stream system.
Because most dischargers release their wastes during Spring
and Fall which are also the times of peak sugar beet processing,
a large slug loading is experienced upon the river system at these
times. Proposed surveys in this plan should provide the additional
information needed to determine the stream effects of this practice
and any necessary recommendations for remedies. Special problems
may also come as a result of the low flows at reduced velocities
that prevent the river from being adequately flushed, thus, nutrient
balance and siltation may be more troublesome than in most other
cases.
h. The Basin covers part of three states, and the Dominion of
Canada, thus there are some interstate and international relations
questions to be considered.
i. Since the Basin also cuts across two EPA regions, Regions V
and VIII, and Region V has not designated the Red River Basin as
a priority basin, special coordination needs to be developed to
assure proper water quality management in the area.
-------
3
.II. Agency and/or Operational Objectives
It is EPA's objective to insure instream water quality standards are
not violated. The Regional office is utilizing (1) North Dakota State's
effluent requirements for municipal dischargers and (2) EPA/Industry
commitments as criteria for reaching this objective? These criteria
are:
Sugar Beet Industry B0D5 = 5#/Ton sliced beets processed
Fecal Coliform = 75 x lO^/Ton slided
beets processed
By FY 75, the BOD5 effluent requirements will be met by North Dakota.
An additional reduction of 356# TSS wi 1-1 be needed in FY 76 in order
to maintain compliance with the criterion. These conclusions apply
to North Dakota's portion of the pollution loading since no effluent
criteria have been established for industries in Minnesota.
Projected reductions to be realized by FY 73 and 74 are:
The DFIC Survey to be completed June 73 should reveal whether or not
recent improvements to several wastewater treatment plants in the basin
have resulted in water quality improvements.
The objectives outlined above will be achieved through the following
program elements and their listed activities:
1. Refuse Act Permits (3B2124) - obtain commitments* to reduce
pollution loadings from several key industries.
2. Municipal Waste Treatment Construction Grants (2B8164) - help
finance the construction of several new wastewater treatment plants
and wastewater treatment plant improvements which will increase
plant efficiency or solve some other water quality problem.
3. Water Quality Planning (2B3149) - approve a comprehensive water
quality management plan which will provide guidance for effective
management of the water quality.
4. O&M, Water Quality Monitoring, Water Pollution Source Surveillance
and Water Quality Enforcement (2B8163), (2B2147), (2B2148), (3B1123) -
assess impact of improvements and carry out implementation
schedules.
Municipal WWTP 25 mg/1 BOD5 in effluent
30 mg/1 TSS in effluent
FY 73
BOD5 60794 #/Day
TSS 13420 #/Day
FY 74
65248 #/Day
58456 #/Day
IV. Approach
*These commitment actions will be immediately converted to permit actions under
the new legislation as soon as guidelines are available.
-------
4
5. Environmental Impact Statements Review (2B6117) - assure that re-
sponsibilities assigned to EPA via the NEPA are observed and
environmental quality maintained and protected.
-------
SECTION B
Basin Load Summary
-------
I l\iV>U I I unjill ^1 ILL i
UU L. V.
SlUKti Minor basw
i Tn Mn fl7nl
& U I IV • Lrf / V-» I
fame of Basin Ro*h Pi upr n-p Nn^th [ Region \jt t t
-.S. -w ¦ » ¦ »¦- * " ' *•' i m i
1. Area covered:
Entire Basin
State(s) Mil—mTi
2. Water quality objectives:
(a) (b) EPA Objective: (c)
Current Minimum Acceptable Actual Level at Accuracy
criteria Ambient lievel Worst Time of Yr. {% + )
Parameter (see WQSj (See Table 4~) (See Table 2) ^Regional est.)
mg/1 mg/1mg/1 ±%
BOD5-25 mg/f] 'same as current
TSS -30 mg/ljef''uePt criteria
DO 5.0 mg/1
r
Stds . for .9 1
-------
T ^
i 11
c» •/*/> ^ r nr **¦ ^l-> ^ ^ ^ « Ax « J (
UI LWJCJ ill pu i I Ul IOII UI^LIIQI yci CApCVlCU •
Yesr of Actual Increase
B0D5
TSS
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
136
272
408
544
570
1140
1710
2280
8. Total reductions to be obtained—sum of 5 and 6 above:
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
1bs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
60794
65248
67998
67998
13420 ¦
58456
68186
68186
*
9. Total reductions required—sum of 4 and 7 above:"
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
BOD5
67946
68082
68218
68354
TSS
65245
65815
66380
V.
66950
1
10. Year in which minimum acceptable water quality levels are to be achieved--
compare 8 and 9 above:
TSS - FY 75 BOD5 - need additional commitment of 356# during FY 76
(To be determined prior to FY 76).
11. If figures for items 2 through 7 above are not available, please provide
estimate of when they will become available through monitoring and other
activities:
Are items 3, 5, and 6 above derived from detailed discharger inventories?
The best available.
12. Key pollutants, if any, for which a'weight or other quantity measure is
not appropriate:
(Note special problems arrd comments).
Figure 10 - Continued
-------
SECTION C
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOKPLIS! NTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 1
«¦ ''Hf rr«iicem
1. Typo of Plan
a .1 1 Sub-Eleoent
b.f ^Part. Sub-Elea.
C-.j... .l n.C.O-JV-AX£J3 _
10,SchcdDate
9.N°-of Cocio.
Nov. 72
2. Program Sub-Element Title Rs9 i() na 1 Administrate 3. S^ub^lement No.
5. Geographical Area Title
Red Ri ver of the North
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
6. Geo. Area Code
O io\
7.Priority
1L
ILANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Meet with Reg i onal Admi ni strator of Region V to devel op a working
agreement between the two Regions to accomplish' a total basin HQM
strategy . .
13.
FY 1974
a.
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
q-z2.--)z ^
rwtaa.'miuu ji a: < x. ¦ 1 'WBr':1::
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO.
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 2.
1. Type of Plan
a -i I Sub-Element
b.L-JFart. Sub-Eleo.
r.l On. Area
|3 .Code
lO^chedDate
of Copp.
2. Program Sub-Element Title
5. Geographical Area Title
3. Sub-Element No.
2BJ3142
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet Ko. g
1 nf 3 1
7.Priority j
11^
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
June 76
Bring about-the integration of North Dakota's and Minnesota's Water Quality
Management Plan through inter-agency cooperation.
^_J
June 76
Review and monitor development of the Water Quality Management Plan to ful-
V
fill the reguirements of 40CFR 35.
.8
June 76
Assist North Dakota in the basin planning activities.for the Red River of
X
the North.
July 73
Review and approve Water Quality Management Plan for Red River of the North
including Fargo SMSA
_L.IL
May 74
Assess impact of new legislation upon Water Quality Management Planning
and the Facilities Management Grants Program.
^0.
Sep 73
Work with Region V, HUD, N.D., Minnesota and Fargo-Moorhead SMSA to set uo
areawide planning organization.
.5£L
M.
^L
Oct 73
Model the Red River of the North using a Simplified Math Model.
JUL
Oct 73
Review the results of DFIC's proposed Water Quality Survey of the
Red River and recent wastewater treatment plant improvements.
.JL
12. FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
a.
b.'
b.
1.0
-4
AO-
14. Prepared by & Date
TA 9-25-72
15. Reviewed by & Date '16 ¦ A:r:roved forRPIO .ii
UP."—"TT -
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 3.
1. Type of Plan
a .1 i Sub-Element
b.f JPart. Sub-Elem.
c.l .ICeo.. Area
2. Program Sub-Element Title Hater Quality Planning
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No.
2B3149
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
2 Of 3
7.Priority
3.Code
9. No
S5
lO^chedDate
of Como.
JUL.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
June 76
Review and coordinate State Program Plans with Water Quality Management
10
plans and construction grants program.
Review and process seven construction grant applications to determine
their compliance with water quality management plans
Feb. 73
a. Amenia WWTP
.6
.5
1.3
June 75
b. Fargo Interceptor
Juns 75
Grafton Interceptor
June 75
d. Grand Forks Interceptor
June 75
e. Valley City Interceptor
^une 75
f. Wahpeton Interceptor
11
12
13
June 75
q. West Fargo Interceptor
June 76
Participate in seven preapplication meetings (See Table
June 76
Assess environmental impact of BOR's Garrison Diversion Prniprt
Evaluate the water quality effects of 4 proposed COF projects within thp Red
River Basin. Q_
JL
June 76
a. Kindred Reservoir:
FY 1973
13. FY 1974
b,'
r, Park Rivpr: and d. Crookston Reservoirs^
14. Prepared by~& Datet15. Reviewed by £ Date jlp.A~proved forRPIO
Tfl 9-25-72 j _J_ , __
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMt'L.. ^MENTS SCHEDULE n -
Page 4
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL .IMENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 5
1. Type of Plan
a J I Sub-Element
b.LJPart. Sub-Eleia.
r .1 r.p.n . A
'•t
nrnrw; ujnr
Ty^" "mz
MUNICIPAL WASTE TREAT
2. Program Sub-Elenent TitleMENT CONSTRUCTION GRANTS"
5. Geographical Area Title
Red River of the Nort
3.
-Element No,
4.Sheet No.
1 Of 3
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7 .Priority
13 .Code
9. No.
lO^chedDate
of Comp.
ILl.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
vX
Conduct preapplication meetings for 7 projects listed on 1 and 5 year needs list
(See Table 3)
*
\
Feb 73
a. Amenia WWTP (1 year needs list)
.2
June 75
b. Fargo Interceptor (5 year needs list)
June 75
'c. Grafton Interceptor (5 year needs list)
June 75
d. Grand Forks Interceptor (5 year needs list.^
June 75
Vallev Citv Interceptor (5 year needs list^
J"np 75
-L Mp^t. Fargn Tnt.prrpptnr ypar npprlc lict)
70 TF"
(3 of 6)
June 75
g. Grafton Interceptor (5 year needs list)
Complete the processing of construction grant applications and grant awards for 13
projects (See Table 3)
\
Aug 72
a. Valley City WWTP Imp.
.3
June 73
Abercrombie WWTP
\
Aug 73
c. Grafton WWTP Imp.
1.2
_LJL
Sv
Ms 12-
d. Wahneton WWTP Imp.
12.
*Y 1973
13.
FY 1974
a.
¦"*
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. ..MENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE
! 1. Type
of
Sub-
Plan
Element
2.
Municipal Waste Treatment
Program Sub-Element Title Construction Grants
3. S^-^fent No*
iw iTfcjm.TrriiiiMjiju*i|
4.Sheet No.
2 Of 3
j b .[_J Part
1 r .1 inp.n.
. Sub-Elem.
Arpa
5.
Geographical Area Title Red River of the
North
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
3. Code
9. No.
105chedDate
of Codd.
n.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Sep
73
e.
Farqo WWTP
.1 1 .0
Oct
*
73
f,
Farqo Water Filtration .1 1.?
Oct
73
g.
Amenia WWTP
1 1 .2
Jun
76
h.
Fargo Interceptor 0 3.0
Jun
76
i.
(3 of 6)
Grafton Interceptor
Jun
76
,i-
Grand Forks Interceptor
\^\\
Jun
76
k.
Valley City Interceptor
\\N^
Jun
76
1 .
WahDeton Interceptor
1
\\\'
¦Inn
76
m.
Wp<;t. Farcin Tntprr.entnr
3
Feb 74
Work with State to
improve the quality and frequency of inspections and
ps
O&M
surveys
.3 .3
4
Oct
73
Revi ew
DFIC's report that results from their survey of several WWTP's along the
[\V\
main stem of the Red River
0 .25
5
Jun
76
Use
State program plans to coordinate administration of construction grants |
L\\>
1.25 1.
25
\YW
12.
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
i.
b.'
a.
b.
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. _..4ENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 7
BtrmiMiwtfcawB
1. Type of Plan
a -f 1 Sub-Element
b.[ ]Part. Sub-Elem.
r .1 jfipn . Art»a
Municipal Waste Treatmen
2. Program Sub-Elenent Title (Construction Grants)
Geographical Area Title Red River 0f the North
3. Sub-
nt No.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
14.
7.Priority
3. Code
9. No.
lOSchedDate
of Comp.
11*.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
June 76
Update 1 and 5 year needs lis'
.3
Influence ND and the following municipalities to provide nutrient removal if such
a need is determined.
June 76
a. Fargo, North Dakota
WWTP
June 76
b. Grafton, North Dakota
WWTP Imp
A
June 76
c. Wahpeton, North Dakota - WWTP Imp
June 76
d. Valley City, North Dakota . - WWTP Imp
8
Encourage state and municipalities to expedite plant
.05
constructi on.
\
\V\\i
12.
l:
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
.50
b.
a. .90
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by 5 Date
16.Approved forRPIO
Planned Aficomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .IMENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 8
e- ¦ i.i.piwi ..i ...i, —i..
| 1. Type of Plan
a /" 1 Sub-Element
bJ 1 Par t. Sub-Elem.
r. J lOo. Arra
2. Program Sub-Element Title REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
3. Sub-Element No.
5T1214
4.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
5. Geographical Area Title pec| River of the North
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
[3. Code
9. No.
KXSchedDate
of Cothd.
11 . PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1
Nov 72
Encouraqe national fundinq of an environmental film to be used
t
in Reqion VIII .25 0
V\\.
?
,lune 76
Distribute to the news media items on environmental issues relatinq
to the Red River Basin .5 .5
3
June 76
Determine whether 7 construction grant projects satisfy the
Equal Employment Act requirements .25 .75
k\\v
k\\\
K\V
K\\
\\\
k\V
;\\\
\\W
12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.ADDroved forRPIO
t \oa «.
b.
a. 1.0 b.
—. "> n Jin .f>itr ¦ »— rmCY»7T»n~'"
LTrjT'jjmuE.1 u ! ¦ t, 'v_-.Lr.. ~ —i
J
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. ,
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 10
1. Type of Plan
a .i~] Sub-Element
b.f J Part. Sub-Elem.
r.l inp.n. Arra
¦ M.'f'Wx JU1T Tf*3LSTC.'UL.l.T
2. Program Sub-Elenent Title
0 & M
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-
>ent No.
A.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
Wf
7.Priority
S3 .Code
9. No.
lOSchedDate
of Conp.
UN-
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Conduct 14 0 & M inspections of completed or to be completed WWTP (See Table 3)
Aug 73
a. Valley City WWTP Improvements
.0
.30
Apr. 74
b. Fargo WWTP
,30
Apr. 74
c. Fargo Water Filtration
.30
Mav 74
Amen.ia WWTP
30
May 74
Abercrombie WWTP
May 74
Wahpeton WWTP Improvements
30
Jun 74
g. Grafton WWTP Improvements
.30
Oct 74
Park River Interceptor Ext. Force Main & Lift Station
.30
Jun 76
Fargo Interceptor
Jun 76
j. Grafton Interceptor
Jun 76
k. Grand Forks Interceptor "
Jun 76
1. Valley City Interceptor "
To noir
(3 Of 6)
iwwi
Jun 76
m.
Wahpeton Interceptor
¦Inn 76
p. West Fargo Interceptor
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
b."
14. Prepared by & Date
cat ¦¦er aw.-accrc-
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .{MENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 11
| 1. Type of Plan
| n -f 1 Sub-Element
5 b .f iPar t. Sub-Elea.
5 r .1 IHpo. A
2. Program Sub-Element Title 0 & M
3- No"
4.Sheet NoVj
? Of 9 8
5. Geographical Area Title RoH „iW +hQ
6. Geo^A^ea Code
7.Priority j
S3 .Code
9. No.
105chedDate
of ComD.
I
2
Feb 74
— -
Work with State to improve 0 & M and sampling procedures .6 .?
^\s
f
K\W
- " ••
KSSS
k\\v
1
\WV
1
\\\
IWW
1 12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
L .08
If-,- ¦¦¦ xn-— ¦ ¦ ¦ i mtu
b.'
ifgrx- ¦
a. .25 b.
ti.,*..,,, t " — — f ni-P ¦ ' m"'lJ
J
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI IENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE "12
2
l 1. Type of Plan
j: -n -l ~i Sub-Elcr.cnt
• ilV-riifwwrt't i
b Part. Sub-Elcn.
2. Program Sub-Elcpent TiticWater Pollution Source Sur
I a.
| lOjichcdDate
n - _
5. Geographical Area Title Rec) River of the North
r ' rV>'-'-*^ -i-
3. Sub-Eleoent No.
\j. 2B2148
jchM^rrMnc^rticn
A.Sheet No. |
1 Of 1
6. Ge
8?oi
rca Code
7.Priority
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Conduct monitoring study of 4 wastewater treatment plants if needed
to determine the impacts of improvements upon water quality.
a. Fargo WWTP
.25
b. Fargo Water Treatment
c. Grafton WWTP Imp
0
d. Wahpeton WWTP Imp.
0
0
Obtain water quality data to be imputted into STORET.
.75
.75
I
1
:s
FY 1974
b.
i (ii.w
14. Prcpm ?d by & Dnto
TA 9-22-72
rWiV'Jjnfy f i
Planned /v. zorjplishment
15. Reviewed by & Da tell 6. Approved forRPIO,
!¦ II. Jl' I I. ¦ >' . ^
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI 1ENTS S.CHEDULE
PAGE *
1. Type of
a.(_JSub-
b.( J Par t
e.' Ifipp
¦ .Code
\\X
y.\
n
\
L-\
9. Ko.
•1
;NV\ I
kv\ ,
SA v
K
\ M
^X\
V'-X
(\y
V A:
\\
Plan
Element
. Sub-Elem.
Area
10.3chedDate
Conp.
May 73
¦In 1 y 74
np>f 74
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area TitleRed River of the North
L..xcr*
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PA Gi.
1. Type of Plan
o -i~] Sub-Element
b.1 ]Part. Sub-Elexn.
g.' IHpo. Atpa
jo .Code
r
A
9. No.
105chedDate
of Cono.
2. Program Sub-Element Tltlcftefuso Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title pecj R-fver of North
3. Sub-Element No,
3 B 2 1 2 4
4.Sheet No.
2 of 4 '
6. Geo. Area Code
°7Q I
11^
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Otter Tail Power Co. - Wahpeton
7.Priority
June 73
a. Develop effluent criteria through RAPP
Sept 73
Obtain committment letter
0
Vs
USDI Baldhill Dam Nat'l Fish Hatchery - Valley City
May 7 3
a. Obtain committment to minimize pollution load
0 .
\
WvM
Amer
•larch 73
June 73
can Crystal Sugar, Drayton
Meet with company to resolve conflict over BOrK stH
Obtain another committment letter
.90
JL
.30 o
-n*-
Er 2. FY 1973
SecjbVast page
13.
FY 1974
a.
b.
ujlT
14. Prepared by & Date
Tl\- ai-'i
15. Reviewed by & Date
Planned Accomplishments
_iu
rgmrjoi:
16.Approved forRPIO
rm.V i .jucun
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 15
Type of Plan
a -i 1 Sub-Element
b.CHlParc. Sub-Elem.
.C.I .Ifiro
9. No.
105chcdDate
of Coop.
Feb 73
June 73
Jan 73
Mar 73
•» ;xrr^
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
UdMUBUj*,
3. Sub-Element No.
3B2124
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
UN-
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Armour Food - West Fargo
a. Negotiate with company to have them use the city sewer
b. Obtain commitment letter
a. Continue negotiations with company to define effluent criteria
b. Obtain commitment letter
A.Sheet No.
3 of 4
7.Priority
90
20
.4
0
0
.60
.9
Jun 73
Review the water quality management plan for Red River Basin and
10 June 75
11
May 73
Fargo-Moo'rhead SMSA
Establish a joint monitoring system with Region V to assess impacts
.4
of RAPP activities in Minnesota portion of Red River Basin. Continue program. 0 5.0
American Crystal Sugar, Moorhead
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesota and industry to agree upon
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI EKTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 16
1. Type of Plan
a -f I Sub-Element
b.f J Part. Sub-Eleai.
r .1 IT.pn
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Eler.cr.t
3B2124
6 • Geo »
. .JH Q1
Code
:7 .Priority
i
'r4.Sr.eit uc. f
1 4 of 4 i
3. Code 9. No
lOSchedDate
of Comp.
LL
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
11 July 74
b. Obtain commitment letter fWork with Region V)
12
American Crystal Sugar, E. Grand Forks
May 73
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesota, and industry to agree upon effluent
limitations
1.0
July 74
b. Obtain commitment letter (Work with Region V)
13
American Crystal Sugar, Crookston
May 73
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesota, and industry to agree upon effluent.
1imi tations
July 74
b. Obtain commitment letter (Work with Region V)
V
June 75
c. Monitor stream and effluent to detect pollution levels
14 Sept 73
15 June 76
JLJL
JUL
_LiL
V
16 June 76
Data Processing of Permits
1.0
2.2 jj
FY 1973
b."
13,
FY 1974
a- 1.0
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv c- Dst:e ! 1c . Aoorova
for?-? 10 j
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACC0M1 JMENTS" SCHEDULE
PAGE 1/
f 11 miiijiiw n
1. Type o£ Plan
n J ] Sub-Element
b .f JPart. Sub-Elem.
r.l JHpo. Arpa
—-T- .-It
2. Program Sub-Element Title Envi ronmental Impact
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No,
¦ 2B6117
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
7.Priority
(3 .Code
\
9. No.
1
lO^chedDate
of Coinp.
UN-
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
JUN 73
Review contents of Water Quality Management plans for Red River Basin
.3
.3
and Fargo-Moorhead SMSA
JUN 76
Evaluate environmental assessment for the water quality management plans, Red
River Basin and Fargo-Moorehead SMSA & 7 construction grant applications 1.5
1.0
a. Amenia WWTP
b. Fargo Interceptor
c. Grafton Interceptor
d. Grand Forks Interceptor
e. Valley City Interceptor
f. Wahpeton Interceptor
g. West Fargo Interceptor
JUN 76
Coordinate with Bureau of Reclamation in the development of the EIS
.3
_«_3_
for the Garrison Reservoir Water Project.
\
i\\Y
I 12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
¥¦ J8„ lb-
a. .11
b.
TA 9-25-72
Ig——PI'TT.1 7— ^ - - '.VI'/-. ; t :
'¦¦¦ ¦¦ tfcL'-fcPJ'lf ¦ iVn —ML 1 i *
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL IMENTS SCUEbULE
PAGE
. u.VtPUl *»»
1. Type of Plan
a J ?Sub-Element
b.( iPart. Sub-Elcm.
r J I Con . Arrr>
2. Program Sub-Element Title Water Quality Standards
5. CcogrAphical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No.
2B1143
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet NoVl
1 of 1
7.Priority
9. No
lOSchedDate
of Conp.
OCT 73
JUN 73
J-U
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Provide standards input to water quality model , develop & use model
Review N.D.' standards and determine need for changing the use
classifications. Check compatibility with Minnesota Water
Quality Standards and pending legislation.
1.2
2.0
¦.5
. 0
FY 1973
L\
.15
b.'
13.
FY 1974
a.
.16
b.
14. Prepare*.' by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
TA 9-22-72
Planned Accomplishments
16.Approved forRPIO
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 19.
#wernfWE
1. Type of Plan >
a •(-—j Sub-Element
b.H~)Part. Sub-Elem.
c.l ICpo. hrrn
I Water
K 2. Program Sub-Element Title Agency Grants
9. No.
v-3. June 76
105chedDate
of Cohp.
Oct 73
June 76
s2l?f!>9
ment No.
_L\Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
11 . '\ PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
A.Sheet No,
1, of 1
7.Priority
\
ReviewIC survey report and determine whether State 1 and 5 vear ne£ds_lis±.
to be chTngecT D T5
Review, coor)kjnate, and approve N. D. State Program Plan 1.25 1.25
Update 1 and 5 Vear needs list
] 2 _ FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
[i. .13
b/'
a. .15
b.
TA 9-?.?-72
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPl/. .IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 20
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 21
1. Type of Plan
a .{_~ Sub-Element
b.( J Part. Sub-Elem.
c.L JGeq.. Area
2. Program Sub-Eltnent Title Water Quality Enforcement
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-gj^^r.t No.
4. Stjeetj. Jio.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
3.Code
lO^chedDate
of Comp.
1U.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
JUN 73
Review Water Quality Management Plan for the Red River Basin and
Fargo-Moorhead SMSA.
.3
.0
Influence N.D. and the following municipalities to provide nutrient removal if such
a need is determined.
JUN 75
a. Fargo, N.D.
WWTP
.2
M
b. Grafton, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
.15
ii
c. Wahpeton, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
n
d. Valley City, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
SEP 74
Reconvene Enforcement Conference & Publish Report
5.0
3.0
JUN 76
Follow-up on recommendations coming from the enforcement
2.5
Conference.
JUN 73
Follow-up on the compliance schedule of Fargo's 180-day notice
.30
.2
JUN 76
Determine necessity of enforcement action for Drayton and other
possible potential 180-day notices (e.g. Drayton)
1.5
1.4
j 12. FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
ill
b."
a.
b.
TA 9-22-72
2.H. 'Ili L
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLH ENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 22
1. ?Y2~ of Plan
q J~ iSub-EicneaC
b.CZJPart. Sub-Elea.
Jvlm
[l05chcdDatc
?.Ko |
9-Ko M Cor-;p.
JUL 74
JUN 76
V ni«» i Mil ¦Tiiw
2. Progran Sub-Eleoeat Title Water Quality Enforcement
-Eleaent No.
4.Shec
5. Geographical Area Title "fled River of the North
6. Ceo. Area Code
0701
6*8? ¥
7.Priority
II
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Assist Enforcement in obtaining commitment letters for 11 industries
2.0
.6
Evaluate the' results of S&A1s.monitoring of the stream and effluent
for the 11 industries .from which commitments were obtained,
0'
2.0
llV
h
.77
FY 1973
b.'
13.
.91
FY 1974
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
« ¦ ¦ n
16.Approved fornPIO
¦ I II I I fAtfU1 ¦ jw-iiii IP
j
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE '23
rzci.v
I. Typ
I
iy?~ of Pl^n
a X J Sub-Elc:r.ent
b.! Jpcrt. Sub-Elea.
r .1 . A rr*>?
>3.Coda
lr~
r\
\
10,SchcdDate
9. No.of Co"ir>.
-1
V
\
!>•>
IySH
k\
i\\\J
!• \ \ \ "i
tf a v _x__L
fV\ \
W \|
i.
^\Ai_
June 73
June 74
June 74
June 73
{
^O^irtll - ¦mrm-e-t-Tir-r-. ¦» wr—m-m- ~-iTTr-i
2. Propran Sub-Elcnent TitlcTechnical Support & Assist
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No.
2B5154
6. Geo. Area Code
). Ar
0701
4.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
7.Priority
PLANNED ACCOMPLISKXENTS
Coordinate with and assist DFIC in a stream survey that is intended to see if in-stream
water quality has improved as a result of improvements 'to certain wastewater treatment
plants. 0.5 0
Supplement the DFIC Survey to determine the"water quality impact of subsequent actions
for improving water quality.
4.0
Conduct a water quality survey to determine a nutrient balance of the Red River System.
10
Review Water Quality flanagemont Plan for Red River Basin and Fargo-flcorhead
SI ISA.
.3
0
FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date 115. Revieved by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
.04
b.'
a* 1.2
b.
Wuif"
Tfl q_??_7? 1
V-wv-f-- ¦ ' ua-i1
-I
Planned ~A\ r ocplishrccnts
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGl ^4
1. Type of Plan
a -f ) Sub-Element
b.f JPart. Sub-Elem.
c-1 I frpo - Arpa
2. Program Sub-Element Title ^ater Quality Monitoring
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No,
2B2147
6. Geo. Area Code
. ..Q7Q1
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
7 .Priority
8. Code 9. No
lQSchedDate
of Comp.
ILjl.
PLAINED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Mil
Supplement-O&M effort to assure effective monitoring nf t.hp Waf.Pr Quality
JUN 76
Impact of WWTP improvements and/or construction.
.2
Work with Enforcement and Permits Branches to effectively monitor effluent
discharged from industrial sources.
.0
V
EX
15. Reviewed by & Date |15.A-?orovad forRPIO \
12.
FY 1973
3.,
.02 ¦
13.
FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
a-•.21
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI""MENTS SCHEDULE
page25
1. Type of Plan
a -i ~) Sub-Element
b.f JPart. S ub-Elem.
g.l IHpp. Arcn
.Code 9. No.
105chedDate
of ComPr
nunc&t;
2. Program Sub-Element Title Manpower Planning
3. Sub-Element No.
2B7161
5. Geographical Area Title Re[j pjygy 0f the North
11. PLANNED ACCOMPLIS1IHENTS
6. Geo. Area Code
Q7m
4.Sheet No,
1 of 1
7 .Priority
June 76
Work, with State on developing manpower planning function
.2
.2
2
June 76
In-house manpower planning - employment and training project .5 .5
% \ > \
12.
FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Revieved bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO j
j. .06
i
b.'
I - '
P
o
CD
b.
TA 9-22-72
JUUU''«IJI HM) JIJLBBPJI ¦ ~
L_UX^ -JILL A—JLl II
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 26
1. Type of Plan
a .1 1 Sub-Element
h-[ JPart. Sub-Elem.
r.l ir.pn Area
10.SchedDate
of Comp.
2. Program Sub-Element Title Direct training - Water
5. Geographical Area Title RpH Rivpr of the North
" - - T '
3.
>ub-Elecr.ent No.
Wi'--
'16 0
6. Geo. Area Code
iLu
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Assist O&M (2B8163) on the inspections of completed municipal wastewater
4,Sheet
_L_2±_
No. |
7.Priority |
APR 74
APR 74
facilities projects (14)
a. Fargo WWTP
b. Fargo Water Treatment
^05 ^5
.05
-J&
J UN 74
c. Grafton WWTP Imp.
J2L
OCT 72
d. Park River Interceptor
_Q5_
HAY 74
e. Amenia WWTP
-OS.
MAY 74
_L Abercrombifi WWTP
m.
may 74
q. Wahpeton WWTP Imp.
.05
h. Valley City WWTP Imp.
Fargo Interceptor
j. Grafton Interceptor
k. Grand Forks Interceptor
1. Valley City Interceptor
m. Wahpeton Interceptor
n. W. Fargo Interceptor
JL
.05
J£_j
(3 of 6)
j
13.
FY 1974
a.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date ? 16. Approved forBPIO ij
Planned Accomplishments
p.- V A-
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI IENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE :
1. Type of Plan
a -ii Sub-Elencnt
b.( JPart. Sub-Elco.
e-1 Arc,?
9. No
105chedDate
of Ccnn.
-•1
Dec 72
Jul 73
2. Program Sub-Element Title Operator Training - Watet
3. S^y^gment No.
4.^h^Qrt -jNo.
5. Geographical Area Title Re
-------
PM * 3ASIM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: SEMI-CTAL PREPARATIONS I.
KEGICil 'VIH
HALF/ 19 Hi
PuEPAP.ED SY: Terry Andersog
c:
o
(i$2me)
APPROVED 3Y:;
lKs:r,e]
Milestones
•c.iiiicAi ivq data c:tai::ed no
C."iri:.',L EFFLUENT DATA OGTAIuED NO
f.'ECEssA.riY r.".on£."Li::G cc;.:pleteo no
i:cfn/ruLLY scvacrEc plans rca a::ea
Ar.-r.ovcD and no r,EV!Sic:;s keeozd no
state pr.:c:;iiiEs fop. i a 5 year ;::eds
co;:;or.::.Eo v/it;i ,v:cc:.:;:Lisi;::r:^T plam
yes
EFFLUENT G^DELNIES EW C;;lTiCAL SOURCES
;v" 11 fc
r\ i ' l.j ¦ . {. c
NO
v:a cr.iTEniA cgvecinc all critical PAr.AtAETEf.s
!;! \rn ;.rr:.:vcD and i;q revisions deeded yes
use c:s;::;Aii2;:s a::q :;o::i::c!!Adat!G!{
STAiE"[;:iS FC.^ A!'.E A Y/AICHS YES
A;7;:ov:n and ::o .'Cvisions nif.ded
I^F'.Ef'ENI ATIGN SCHEDULES COVcRiNG Ti:E AREA'S
DISCHARGERS APPROVED AND CO'.ifOSMLD WITH..-•
Acco::«i'iisi;r.;LHT plan yi s
DATE {.!ILEST0li£
atta::;zo or to hi
ATTAINED
OCT 1972
JULY 1 , 1973
TCiiES REPORT DATE SUBMITTED:
BhS'if' River of the North
General Engineer ^
(Title)
(Title) [Initials)
LIST ANY Li IS SING Oil I!!ADEQUATE I'iltPA.IATIOMS AND INDICATE
fa EACH PERIOD I.1! CUMEilT STATUS. DISCUSS TliuSE NEEDING
I-IEADG'JARTERS ATTENTION, INCLUDING REASONS. COiViXTIVE
MEASURES, AEiD IMPLICATIONS rG.'l FUTURE PROGRESS. USE
SUPPLEMENTARY SHEETS AS NECESSARY.
'instrcaiu Water Quality needs to bo correlated more
closely with those times when discharges are permitted.
North Dakota requires holding or waste during ice cover.
However, insufficient data exists that identifies what
11 j n Innrliiuis occur duriiu: iii sciia rne .
Model is underway,
Water Quality Management Plan on schedule - money and
time will prevent detail analysis of a.11 waste sources,
Need effluent guidelines'for Armour Food and Union
Stockyards in W. Fargo , Minnkota Power Coop in Grand Forks,
TttVt—iri-n—. ¦ ¦ 1
Changes will be needed if national policy v/i 11 be to
;ti[jgrirncr nl 1—simrsrTs—fctrrecreati onal cl assi fi cBti on.
1965 Enforcement Conference established .iflie dates.
-------
SECTION D
Point Source Loads 5 Locations
-------
RIVER BASIN RED
WASTEWATER SOURCE
American Crystal Sugar-Drayton
TABLE 1
RIVER MILE 20b.
4 Red
PV/PN 9/1
FY 73
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
19 MGD Ave.
7.5 MGD Ave.
11.5 MGD Ave.
76 MGD Max.
63 MGD Max.
12.5 MGD Max.
PH
7.6
Temp, °F
46 Min.
72 Max. 5
63,044iVDay
BOD,-
415 mg/1;
60794
65 ,794#/D<
y
TDS
1078 mg/1;
170,906#/t
ay
TSS
102 mg/1;
13,420#/Day
13420
16,171#/Dc
y
NH3-N
15.2C mg/1;
2410#/Day
Org-N
:id
Total-N
ND
Total-P
MD-
Fecal Coli.
Mot Reportec
flay 75 x lO^/Ton
fiD
Total Coli.
Not Reportec
MD
Grease & Oi1
NA
Toxic Metals
[--'A
Sul fides
0.65 mg/1
¦ -Other Toxi cs
""07
13T
/ 4 75 76
2750
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 75
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
73 75 73 7o
•f
None, Recycle
15T
long. 97-09-00
11.5 MGD. Ave.
12.5 MGD Ave.
60794
13420
2750
75 x 106/To
(5)
COMMENTS
Type of Facility - Sugar Beet
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1 BOD5 = 0.5i?/Ton sliced beets - EPA requirements. .
2' Fecal coliform = 75 x 10°/ton of sliced beets - EPA requirements; or 41 x 10lu/day over intake
3!
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)
73
74 75
76
7.5 MGD Ave.
63 MGD Max
63,044#/Day
13,420#/Day
(7)
PV
-------
rivi i1 I'A'i III Red
t'JA:. 11 1IU11 It SU'JKIL Armour Food-West Fargo
illVl.i't MILE 25.1 Sheyenne River
PV/I'IJ 7/2
iAm i:
TH"
COrii'EriTS :
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
w
(3T
14T
(5)
~Wf
~UT
Present
Pres. Reduc. I'.cq'd
FY 72 Commits
IV 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) 4- (4)
(2) + (5)
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA (Jbj.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 "6
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.017
Est. 10% (.0017)
Pli
7.6
N/A
N/A
Temp, °F
bod5
TDS
TSS
Nll3-N
Org- K
45 U
68 S
54 mg/1;
5.4#/day
1597 mg/1
159.7 #/day
26 mg/ 1,
2.6 #/day
1.0 mg/1
0.10 #/day
n/d
No obj . as yet.
Probable connect
to San. Sewer.
Wil 1 locate exact
location of dis-
charge to sewer.
None
.5 #/day
15.9 #/day
.26 #/day
.01 #/day
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
1.63 mg/1
.16 #/day
115
.016 it/day
11 .5 #/day
Total Coll .
19,300
1 ,9300/day
Grease & Oil
Toxic lietals
84 mg/1,
8.4 #/day
N/A
1
8#/day
Other Toxics
N/A
Total Commits
Total Reduction
PV
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SQURCEFarqo (Construction underway) WWTP
RIVER MILE 441 Red
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY
72 Commits
FY
73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) +
(4)
i
t
(2) + (5
)
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
73
74 75 75
73
74 75 76
! 73 7-i 75 75
73
74
75
76
¦ 73
74 75
/ c
Flow, MGD
1 0 MGD Desi gn
7.0
1
1
PH
N/D
j
i
Temp, °F
N/D
1
1
I
BOD5 12000#/C
3500 #/Day
2044 #/day
2300
#/day (74)
19.2 19.2 19.2 19.2
2300
2300
0
C
2063
19.2 19.2
19.2
|
TDS
N/D
1
1
TSS /14040#/[
4200 "
2449
2449
#/day (74)
22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6
2449
2449
0
0
2472
22.6 22.6
22.6
NH3-N
N/D
i
i
Org-N
N/D
'
1
t
Total-N
N/D
1
1
1
Total-P
N/D
1
1
i
I
!
1
Fecal Coli.
N/D
!
j
1
j
1
3
Total Coli.
N/D
1
1
1
i
Grease & Oil
N/A
i
i
1
Toxic Metals
N/A
|
i
l
Other Toxics
N/A
. 1
\
/ - \
i
i
PV
.2! 3.0
.5
3.0
COMMENTS:
lypa of Facility - Trickling Filter followed by lagoons (580 acres)
Present^E 53*365 ^yr'2000^) 1130 PE/Yr. = 192.1 #B0D5/Day, Q = .11 mgd. increase/yr. BOD incr.
Effluent Requirements 1972 1973 1 974 1975 1976
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - 1456#/d 1479#/d 1501#/d 1524#/d 1547#/d
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 1751#/d 1775#/d 1801#/d 1832#/d 1860#/d
19.2#/day
1456#/d
30 mg/1 - SS - 1751#/d
3- Q = MOD
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate) ,
*This project is a special exception because of enforcement proceedings.
7.11
7.22
7.33
7.44
6.5*
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
I.'ASTlI.'ATlR SOURCE Union Stockyards-W. Fargo
RIVER IiILE ?5.1 Shpypnnp Ri vpr
TABLE I
Try
12r
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
i
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.917
1.0
PH
8.3
6.5 to 8.5
Temp, °F
bod5
TDS
41 w
69 s
10 mg/1
782 §/day
1293 9900
572 rt/day
None
TSS
460 5000
4,750 It/day
nh3-n
6 54.6
Org-N
IV D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
1.8 13.85
Fecal Coli.
360/100 ml.
Total Coli.
965/100 ml .
5000/100 ml .
Grease S Oi1
11/A
Toxic Metals
IV A
!
Oth^r Toxics
N/A
I
TTT
COMMENTS: Lat. 46-50-45 Long. 45-53-30
Type of Facility Holding sen washing, trough washing, water trough
Design P. E. ran over.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenents
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Total Commits
Total Reduction
(3) + (4)
73 74 75 76
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
"Y 73, 74 Commits
'3 74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
10%
None
4750 #/day
78
78
78
78
990
990
990-
990
500
500
500
500
5
5
5
5
1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
757
None
4750 #/day
(6T
550
78
78
78
390
990
990
990
5250
500
500
500
5
5
5
5
1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
T7T
Company and EPA are currently working on commits.
Better conservation practices should decrease waste loads.
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Fargo.
RIVER MILE 441 Red
PV/PN 5/5
N.D. Mater Filtration Plant
TABLE I
Total Comets
JT) + (4)
Tota> Recuci
(2) - I
ion
TT~"
PV
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, flGD
14.0
PH
7.0
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
40,000 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic "etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
36,500 #/day
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76"
40,000 #/day
FY 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 75
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
0 0
0 ; 0
0 0
40,000 #/day
"TO (21 (3T
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - Sludge handling facilities for water filtration plant.
Design P.E. - 53,365
Present P.E. - 35,000
Effluent Requirements
1.
2. 30 mg/1 SS-3500 ft/day
3.
Type Sewer (Combined ui Separate)
147
(6)
T77
DNA
DNA
5.0
i
i DNA
137
5.0
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Minnekota Power Coop. Grand Forks
RIVER MILE Red 298 Red
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
Exoected Incr. ! (3) + (4) i \2) * 1,5) i
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76 1 73 74 75 75 i /3 74 7o /o !
Flow, MGD
30 mgd
No increase unless j j j
plant expands fac. 1 ; :
PH
8
I i
Temp, °F
60 w
None
j 1
i i
85 s
i j
bod5
6 mg/1
i ' i
i
1500 #/day
i i
jo 0 0 o.o 0 0 0 j
TDS
200 mg/1 ,
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
50,000 #/day
i ; ;
1 0 0 4980 0 '4980 0 0 0
TSS
20 mg/1 ,
4980 #/day
0 0 0 0
0 0 4980 0
5,000 ff/day
1 ' i
nh3-n
0.2 mg/1
; i
i
50 lb/day
; j
Org-N
N/D
1 ¦ i
i :
Total-N
N/D
! ! 1
i I
Total-P
0.2 mg/1
1 ;
1 '
50 #/day
i I
) |
Fecal Coli.
N/A
1 ! ;
Total Coli .
N/D
i s i
Grease & Oil
N/A
1 ( ;
Toxic Petals
N/A
! 1 !
Other Toxics
N/A
i
i i i
10'" \nilTS :
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Reauirements
1.
2.
Lat. 47-56-25 Long. 97-2-40, steam-electric plant.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Otter Tail Power Co. Wahepton
RIVER MILE Red 545.2 Red
PV./PN
TABLE I
Total CoT.sits
TotlcI Redi;:"!
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
I Excecied Incr.
(3) - [-)
(2 j + ; 5)
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 75
73 74 75 76
I 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
14.3
1
!
PH
8.4
¦
Temp, °F
bod5
45 w
90 s
7 mg/ 1 --833 #/c
ay
i
|
TDS
TSS
nh3-n
Org-N
210 mg/1--250,OOC
#/day
6 mg/l--714 ff/da.y
.18 mg/1
21 #/day
N/D
No EPA Obj. de-
veloped as of 9/13
None
No increase unless
plant size is incr.
N/A
j
N/A j
1
Total-N
N/D
1
I
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
1
1
Total Coll .
N/D
i
i
)
1
Grease & Oil
N/A
i
I
Toxic Metals
N/A
1
1
Other Toxics
N/A
>
i
TTJ
127
COMMENTS:
Type of Facil i ty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Steam-Electric Plant Lat. 46-17-18 Long. 95-36-03
-------
P.IVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Pil1sbury-Grand Forks
RIVER MILE Red 298 Red
3/6
TABLE I
Total Corwits
Total Redaction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
1 Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5) !
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
! 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75 :
Flow, MGD
0.23
1 - ¦
1 i
•
1
1
j
1
PH
8.1
1
1
Temp, °F
68°F
i
|
bod5
20 mg/1
No EPA objective
None
None
No increase
N/A
n/a ;
37.2 #/day
expected.
1
TDS
4848 mg/1
1
i
9160 #/day
' j
TSS
10 mg/1
; |
19.1 #/day
: 1
1
NH3-N
.44 mg/1
1 1
1 j
.75 #/day
! 1 >
Org-N
N/D
! . . 1
1 ! 1
Total-N
N/D
!
,
.
Total-P
.026 mg/1
j
i
I
.050 if/day
Fecal Coli.
N/D
I 1
¦ 1 I
i
Total Coli.
N/D
1
! I
Grease & Oil
N/A
I i 1 .
111
i ! 1
Toxic Petals
N/A
; i i
1 1 i
Other Toxics
N/A
111!
1 ! 1 1
ttt
,0, ii'-'ErJTS:
Ty:e of Faci1lty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
T3T
Lat. 47-56-40
Long. 97-03-20
Water used for air conditioner cooling only.
(4T
(5)
(6)
~UT
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE USDI Valley City National Fish Hatchery, Valley City
RIVER MILE Sheyenne River 248 Valley City
PV/PN 2.5/7
.TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Ccnwizs I Expected Ir.cr.
iota! Co ""lis
\ozc~. P.edL
;"^T
73 74
75
76737475
76
73 74
75
76 : 73 74 75 76 ; 73 7^
75
Flow, MGD
10.9 x 10
PH
7.9
Temp, °F
39 W
85 S
bod5
4 mg/1 .9
TDS
0.1 mg/1
TSS
.14 mg/1 -
MH-j-N
J
0.75 mg/1
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
0.40 mg/1
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Petals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
.02#/
.05
No objective,
day
#/day
#/day
6 #/day
None
None
No increase unless
size is increased.
None
None
75T
UT
TH
Fish Hatchery
CC.'ii-'ENTS:
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
12]
Lat. 46-57-45
Long. 98-01-45
W
UY
TV
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE USDI-Baldhill Dam National Fish Hatchery-Valley City1
RIVER MILE Sheyenne River 248 Valley City
iWLE
lotal Coiumts
Tctai Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Coirmits
| Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
t -j ' , r - \
\ I; t- \z -
'.,'aste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75
73 74 75 76 >
Flow, I1GD
11.5 x 106 gal/
yr.
I
;
PH
-8.4
1
Temp, °F
bod5
TDS
39 w
85 s
6 mg/1
.15 #/day
0.1 .02 */da
No objectives.
y
No commits
None
None unless Hatcher
size is increased.
None
None |
i
;
TSS
25 mg/1 - 6.55
#/day
i
nh3-n
0.06 mg/1 - .01E
#/day
1
I
Org-N
N/D
!
i
¦
Total-N
v N/D
i
'
Total-P
0.20 mg/1 - .052
5. #/day
:
1
i
i
Fecal Coli.
N/D
j
'¦
Total Coli.
N/D
¦
!
Grease & Oil
N/A
!
Toxic Iletals
N/A
i
t
Other Toxics
N/A
!
!
tit
W
COMllEKTS:
Type of Facil ity
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Fish Hatchery Lat. 47-02, Long. 098-05
Discharge is intermittent.
W
Vi
-------
RIVER BASIM Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE ihermmhie (plant new under construction)
P--R '"ILE 501 Red
/ PN 2.5/7
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
FTov;, ,'IGD
PH
Temp, °F
BOD5 44.2
TDS
TSS 520
hh3-h
Org-fJ
Total-M
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic Petals
Cther Toxics
Present
Load
.096
7
N/D
132.6 #/day
(150 mg/1 )
156 #/day
190 mg/1
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/A
N/A
N/A
[Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
112.8 #/day
132 #/day
TH ' (21
cc::;;e:jts:
Type of Facility Lagoons (3 acres)
Design P.E. 350 - 1990
Present P.E. 260 - 1990
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (208) - 19.8 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (2502) - 24.0 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (or Separate)
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76"
118.8 0
143.4 0
0 0
"TTT
Tctal CoT,T.i ts
FY 73. 74 Commits I Expected IncrT 1 (5) + (4) j
' =r^ —1—-r~—'—=n1 — =Tc : -/ r, ~ic* 7 -
Tocil Reduction
""73 74 ~7"5 76 ; 73 74 75 76 i
75 76 I 73
L2.J_
(5;
jo 75
w
0 0
0 0
0 o
T5T
118.8 0 0 0 1112.8 0 0
0 ''143.4 0 0 0 ; 132 0 0
"W
TtT
1.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
-------
P. I'nSI
Red
SOURCE/ Amenia
R1VLR iiILE 426 (R.R. - confluence w/Rush River)
PV/Pil 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Flow, JIGD
.011
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
17 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
20#/day
nh3-n
N/D
Ory-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Col i.
N/D
Total Col i .
N/D
Gii'.ise & Oil
N/A
Toxic I'.etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
TT)
Pres. Reduc. i'.jq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
14.7 #/day
17.2 #/Day
(2T
TABLE I
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75
0 15.0 0
0 18
T3f
76
T~Y 73, 74 Commits 1 Expected Incr.
Total Commits
73 74 75 76
"747
73
74 75 76
W
73
HI
74
15.3 0
18 0
ill
75 76
W
COMMENTS:
T>pe of Facility - Present facilities - septic tanks, proposed future facilities - 2-cell waste stabilization lagoon system.
Dcs i gn P. E. - 1 50
Present P.E. - 100
Effluent Requirer.ients
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (208) - 2.3 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (256.2) - 2.8 #/day
3.
Type Sewer or Separate) No storm sewer.
Total Reduction
75T~
12T
14.7 0
17.2 0
Tn
PV
73 74 75 76
1.0
0.5
1 .0
DNA
2.5
-------
rivli; lam 11 Red
WASTE'./ATCR SOURCE Cavalier (assume 90% removal)
RlVTii MILE 196 Rush R. to Red to mouth
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
TTT
Tzl
1W
(47
COMMENTS:
Tyoe of Facility - 2-cell waste stabilization lagoon system (15.5 acres)
Design P.E. 1830 - 1992 (24.9 PE/Yr) lineal incremental growth
Present P.E. 1381
Effluent Requirenents
1 . 25 mg/1 - BOD - 208 - 99.9
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 250.2 - 120.0 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (£s)Qb^»£)dxxtr Separate)
No significant impact. Is not develope'd in Tables III & IV.
Code 1 will be used to indicate this fact on remainder of
table.
PV
r V / I H c. . J/ /
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. I!eq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
FY 72 Commits
I I'Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.48 mgd
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
70.5 #/day
0
0
0
48 #/day (est.)
0
)o not exceed ef-
(18 mg/1)
fluent allowances.
TDS
N/D
TSS
82.5 #/day
0
0 '
0
50 #/day (est.)
0
(22 mg/1)
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Col i.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
n/a
Other Toxics
N/A
L- it\
1 .0
0.5
1 .0
DNA
2.5
-------
: M i' hv,in . Red
v', I; 111! Sl'UKU- Drayton
[VI.K I.ILE 208 Red " .
r/\i:i i: 1
1 V / t H t~ • '
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc.
to Meet EP/1
Flow, I1GD
.33
PH
N/D
Tenm, °F
N/D
bod5
55.8 #/day
0
(20.3 mg/1)
TDS
H/D
TSS
65.7 #/day
0
24 mg/1
[IH3-N
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Feca1 Col1 .
N/D
Tot.il Col i.
N/D
Grease & Uil
N/D
Toxic lictals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
UT
!!>.q'd
I"Y 73 , 74 Commits
74
75 76
W
= 8.6 PE/Yr -1.5 #/day
COMMENTS:
Type or Facility ~ 10 acre - 2 cell lagoon system
Design P.E. 1250 ultimate (1990) 155
Present P.E. 1095
Effluent Requirements
1 25 mg/1 - 208 - 68.6 #/day - 1976 load to stream does not exceed 68.6 #/day
2 30 mg/1 - 250.2 - 82.5 #/day - 1976 load to stream does not exceed 82.5 #/day
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
Expected Incr.
"73 74 75 76
.15 .15 .15 .15
.17 .17 .17 .17
~(3) 4- (4)
73 74 75 76
(2) + (5)
73 '4 75 76
75T
W
Try
2.5
CODE 1
-------
Rivn: f;-%S ITJ Red
UlLi.'.viF.R SOURCE "Fairmount
TABLE I
RIVER MILE 462
1 73
1 CD
CL
py/TU 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc.
to Meet EPA
Flow, MGD
.12
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
TDS
21.0 #/day
20 mg/1
N/D
0
TSS
nh3-n
27.7 #/day
27 mg/1
N/D
0
Org - li
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coll.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic i'.etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
HT
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
1W
CO!ii'EIITS:
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requi rerients
1 . 25 mg/1 - BOD - 25.5 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 30.9 #/day
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
Lagoon system, 2 cells (5.20 acres)
462 ~ 1992 I8"3 PE/Yr
IY 73, 74 Commits
"73 74 75 76
W
Expected Incr.
73
74 75 76
Total Commits
HL
147
73 74 75 76
J5T
UT
Total Reduction pv
(2) - '
T5T
73 74 75 76
VT
1.0
.5
1.0
2.5
CODE 1
-------
I'rVl I il
Red
ii'..A 1 Li\ SOURCE Grafton
TABLE
. [ ,:l r I i L E 220 R.Park to Red to mouth
Total Commits
Total Reduction PV
7TT
to Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. (:eq'd
to Meet E!'A (ib/j.
FY 72 Commits
I'Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, fiGO
5.7 MGD
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
BOD5
1740 #/day
555 #/day
570 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Negligible
570 0 0 0
555 0 0 0
1.0
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
2088 ir/day
666 ;?/day
666 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Negl igible
666 0 0 0
666 0 0 0
1.0
NH3-H
N/D
Org- H
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & f;l
N/A
l)NA
Toxic Iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
UT
JTT
1W
UT
(77
co;-;i;e;jts:
Tyoe of Facility 2.5 acre aerated lagoon followed by 2 x 70 (140 acres) lagoon cells - grant 1972 - pretreatment of industrial waste.
Design P.E. 33,000 466 PE/Yr. = .047 mgd or population projection 5663-1970 to 6550-1970 assume no individual growth.
Present P.E. 24,600 Qinc/Yr. BOD5 inc. = 44 PE or 7.5 #/day qinc - 4400 GPD
Effluent Requirements BOD stream = .75 i?/day
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 1185 #/yr.
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 1425 #/Yr.
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
2.5
-------
i i!' i:i Red
S'.1.1: ;1 i.'-'ui:: SOUKIL Grand Forks
l:; Vl:: illLE
I Alii L J
2.5/7
298 Red
l.'.iste Parameter
Flow,
;igd
9.6
PH
N/D
Te mp,
°F
N/D
bod5
TDS
1992 #/day
(25 mg/1)
N/D
TSS
2340 #/day
(29 mg/1)
N/D
Orcj-1'!
N/D
Total
-N
N/D
Total
-P
N/D
Feca 1
Co 1 i.
N/D
Total
Col 1 .
N/D
Cre«.ir>
e & (Ji 1
N/A
Toxi c
iietal s
N/A
Ot her
Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
TT
Total Commits
Pres. Reduc. iirq'd
toMeetEPA (Jbj .
FY 72 Connin ts
7b
73 74
76
(27
l-Y 73, 71 Commits ! Expected Incr.
73
74 75
76
TTT
\4T
C0"i ir.iJTS:
Typo of Fac11 i ty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 1995 H/day
73
74 75 76
#/Day
37.5 37.5 3/.5 37.5
45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
73
W
m.
74 75
76
W
w
Total Reduction
IT) fPV
T2T
73
74 75
76
Based on pop. incr
and hydraulic incr
BOD & SS eff. req.
wi11 not be violatec
T77
1 .0
.5
1.0
DNA
2.5
2. 30 mg/1 SS
3.
Type Sewer
Waste stabilization lagoon system (600 acres) - the assump. is that proj. on 5-yr. needs list is extension of sewer system.
54 000 - 1992
39'oofi - 1Q7?J 7^0 P.E./Yr. Qinc - 075 MGD/Yr. @ 25 mg/1, BOD to stream - 37.50
' BOD stream = 37.50 #/day
1973 . 1974 1975 1976
BOD in Stream (Cap)
2400 #/day
Separate)
2043.6 #/d. 2088#/d. 2133 #/d. 2175 #/d.
BOD from plant 2028 #/d. 2087#/d. 2102 #/d. 2145 #/d.
SS will follow the same pattern, just factor figures.
-------
_Red_
riivn? iv,5in__
lv"'i r '.v i L.'i SOURCE Grand Forks Air Force Base
K'YlR ;iILE 298 ReT-
P'.'/Pii 2.5/7
TABLE I
HT
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. !:
to Meet EPA 0
Flow, "GD
3.3
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
537 )?/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
630 #/day
0
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic i'etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76"
T2T"
T3T
COM!iEIITS :
Type of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoon system (total 80 acres).
Design P.E. 10500 Anticipate no future increase in population.
Present P.E. 10500
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD (684#/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS (825#/day)
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
Total Commits
Total Reduction
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
— PV
:Y 73, 74 Commits
74
Expected Incr.
75 76 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75
76
0*
W
_L
1 .0
.5
1 .0
DNA
{5) (5) UT
CODE 1
Population increases assumed to be constant.
2.5
-------
Red
rii;Asni___
AS T\ 1 lI: SOURCE Hillsboro
TABLE I
iUVlI' ;;i'LE 319 - confluence with R.R.of North & Goose
T7
Total Commits
Total Reduction py
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. iluq'd
to Meet EPA Obj .
FY 72 Commits
! rr 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, '1GD
.36
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
66.6 #/day
0
0
0
Negl igible
0
0
(22.2 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
TSS
80.1 #/day
0
0
0
Negl igible
0
0
(26.0 mg/1)
iiH3-n
N/D
Ortj-i'i
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Col i .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
(2T
(67
1.0
5
1.0
2.5
COMilCiJTS:
Tyne of Facility - 2 cell waste stabilization lagoon system (17 acres) CODE 1
Design P.E. -2000 - 1990 project
Present P.E. 1335
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (75 #/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (90#/day) .2% linear increase in population (1960-1970) and pollution load ,04#/day BODc for FY 73
3- .05#/day SS for FY 73
Type Sewer Separate)
-------
,111 Red
Hi; lA'tJkU
Li sbon
II L I
'// i';i
2.5/7
441 - confluence of R.R. of North & Sheyenne R.
Waste "Parameter
Present
Load
Flow,
'".CD
.18
PH
N/D
Temp,
°F
N/D
eod5
TDS
99.0 #/day
(22 mg/1)
N/D
TSS
NH3-11
108 #/day
(26 mg/1)
N/D
Org-I'i
N/D
Total -
N
N/D
Total -
P
N/D
Fecal
Col i.
N/D
Total
Col i .
N/D
Grease
S Oil
N/A
Toxi c
iletal s
N/A
0' her
Toxics
N/A
TH"
Pres. Reduc. L' q'd
to Meet EP'A Ooj.
FY 72 Coiiinn ts
75
73 74
76
!"Y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
Expected lncr.
73 74 75 76
negl igible
negl igible
Total Commits
ITS + C4T~
73 74 75
76
T4T
T5T
T6T
Total Reduction PV
T5T~
72T
73
74 75
76
1.0
.5
1 .0
(2) (T>
COKnEilTS:
Type of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoon system (est. 22 acres) no data available).
Ppf™fPpEF " ?onn ] 1.938 #/day - BOD to stream Qinc/day/yr - .21 fIGD BOD inc./yr to stream = 1.938# but inc. in Q = .21 MGD
.25 mg/1 BOD eff. std. is not violated (increase = 1 mg/1)
TTT
2.5
1800 J 1>938 #/day - BOD to stream Qinc/day/yr
Effluent Requirentents
1 . 25 mg/1 - BOD - (lll#/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (135#/day)
3.
Type Sewer (>OOfi)tWte&>w; Separate)
CODE 1
-------
ci'.'in : • •:'• Red -
w'.,srLV:AT::< source Pflrk RiVPr (citvl
Rl'.'LP. ' 11LE ??o - confluence of Red River and P.R.
PV/PN P.5/7 .
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Flow,
MGD
.51
PH
N/D
Temp,
°F
N/D
bod5
TDS
105 #/day
(25 mg/1)
N/D
TSS
Nii3-n
123 #/day
(29 mg/1)
N/D
Ory-i'I
N/D
Total
N
N/D
Total-
P
N/D
Fecal
Co 1 i.
N/D
Total
Co 11.
N/D
Greise & Oil
N/A
Toxic
lietol s
N/A
Otlior
Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
Try
Pres. Reduc. i^q'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
T2r
TV 73, 74 Commits
74 75 76
"W
^ Fanlitv - 1-acre aerated cell followed by a 20-acre cell and a 10 acre cell
Desum P.E. " 3500 - (1990 popl proj . = 2200) Expected Increase - 0
Present P.E. " 1750
Effluent Requirenents
1 25 mg/1 - BOD - (105s7day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (127.5 #/day)
3.
Type Sewe- totttfmfcXWX Separate)
Total Commits
Expected Incr.
73
74 75 76
(3) + (4T
73 74 75 76
TsT
W
Total Reduction
(2) + (bT~
PV
73
74 75 76
1 .0
.5
1.0
TTT
2.5
-------
HIVI 1' HASH) Red
W^S"i L¦-• A1 E R SOURCE Pembina
k IV f. I-; i i i L E 1 58
PV/Pli 2.5/7
TABLE
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, iMGD
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
TDS
TSS
mh3-n
Org-fJ
T o t a 1 - N
Total-P
Fecal Coll.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic lieta 1 s
Other Toxics I
.18
N/D
N/D
35.7 #/day
(24 mg/1)
N/D
42 #/day
(28 mg/1)
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/A
N/A
¦ N/A
IPres. Reduc. Iloq'd
t.o Meet EPA C'jj ¦
"HT
co;-;.';e:jts:
Ty,;e of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoon system (23 acres]
Design P.E. - 2300
Present P.E. - 700
Effluent Requirenents
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 37.5 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 450 */day
3.
.J .
Type Sewer Separate)
Ty 73, 74 Commits
"73 74 75 76
Expected Incr
73 74 75 76
.25
.25 .25
.25 .25 .25
.25
T4T
Total Comini ts_
IK
HI
73 74 75 76_
Total Reduction
1^T5) ' PV
m
73 74 75 76
T5T
W
UY
1.0
.5
1.0
2.5
CODE 1
Population increased 1.8% per year during 1960-1970 decade.
Assume expected increase ~ 0.
-------
Ki'. i.!5
i'.i". I i] Red
bl'UIU-L Wahpeton
:ULL 549 Red
'I Ai;u
Total Commits
Total Reduction
(T)
T2T
13T
T4T
15T
T6T
T77
COMnEflTS:
Type of Facility - aerated lagoon followed by waste stabilization lagoon system (70 acres).
Design P.E. - 16500
Present P.E. - 10400 (overloaded, Population - 7000 - present lagoon capacity)] .340 P.E./Yr. inc.
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - (624 #/day)
2. 30 mg/1 SS - (750 #/day) CODE 1
3.
Type Sewer (tonbooxaatxaR Separate)
17.4#/day to stream BOD Q/Yr. - .09
BOD inc. = neg.
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. C<'q'd
to Meet EPA Olj.i.
FY 72 Commits
1 Y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
Expected Jncr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
PV
73 74 7b 76
1 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, !1GD
3.0
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
BOD 5
2091 #/day
1467 if/day
0 1467 0 0
negl igible
0 1467 0 0
1467 0 0 0
1.0
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
2510 #/day
1760 ff/day
0 1760 0 0
negligible
0 1760 0 0
1760 0 0 0
1.0
NII3-N
N/D
Orr;- il
N/D
T 01 a 1 - N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic i'.etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
|
2.5
-------
RIViK P..".SI i'J Red
WASTF'.'Al E!\ SOURCE Walhalla
IIIYEK MILE
TABLE I
196 confluence with Pembina and Red River of North
Total Commits
Total Reduction
ITT
727
W
W
T5T
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Keq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
I-Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5) !
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 , 74 75 76 '
Flow, HGD
.39
PH I
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
75.0 #/day
0
• 0
0
.25 .25 .25 .25
0
none needed
(23 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
TSS
88.5 #/day
0
0
0
.30 .30 .30 .30
0
none needed
(27 mg/1)
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total - P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
!
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
(6)
J PV
.5
UT
2.5
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - Two-cell waste stabilization lagoon (18.9 acres)
Design P.E. _ 2460
Present P.E. - 1471
Effluent Requirerients
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (81 #/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (97.5 #/day)
3.
Type Sewe1" Separate)
CODE 1
.3% population increase per year during 1960-1970.
-------
'-I"— Red
¦¦i: i l;-' SO'jRCL West Fargo-Shevenne River
;,1LL Shevenne 23.1
TACLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. K>-q' d
to Meet EPA OL>j .
FY 72 Coniiints
IV 73, 74 Commits
I ExDected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
| 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, I1GD
3.42
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
302.1 #/day
0
0
0
negllgi ble
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
354.0 #/day
0
0
negligi ble
0
0
HH3-r«
M/D
Org- N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Tecal Coll.
N/D
To ta1 Col l.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
"W
VT
DNA
Try
wr
w
COM? :E[JTS:
Tynii of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoons (168 acres) j Increase in load due to population is offset by increase in
Design P.E. - 24,609 (6,759 domestic + 17,850 industrial)." Q d t noDulation
Present P.E. . cg29
Effluent Requirements
1 . 25 mg/1 - BOD - 711 #/day.
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 855 #/day.
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
2.5
-------
vu: f.A'SIN Red ,
;;'.;ATi:i' SOURCE Valley City (New project is for the con-
TABLE I
1VL:< MILE 248.CTSTieyerine
PV/niJ 2.577
Waste Parameter
struction of force M.
and lift station)
Present
Load
Flow, I!GD
2.13
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
TOS
399 #/day
(23 mg/1)
N/D
TSS
iiH3-ri
469.5 #/day
(27 mg/1)
N/D
Org-II
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Tota1 Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
ITT
Pres. Reduc. Iicq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j ¦
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
UT
T3T
|!Y 73, 74 Commits
74
75 76
Expected lncr.
73 74 75 76
73
Total Commits
2K
W
74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2) + 15)
73
74 75 76
PV
l4f
15T
16T
17T
CO! li'iEiJTS:
Type of Facili ty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenents
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 444 §/day
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 532.5 #/day
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
3 cell waste stabilization lagoon (117 acres)
] 297 PE/Yr. BOD to system = 15.15 #/day/year Qin - .09 BOD to stream/y - 22 mg/1.
1.0
.5
1.0
2.5
-------
Red
W'.STiATTR SOURCE American Sugar, Hoorhead. Minn.
niVii: HILC 438 Red
rv/i'i: 7/2
TABLE 1
l.'r.slc Pa rants ter
Flow, I1GD
10 MGD
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
118,000
TDS
N/D
TSS
12,500
nh3-n
N/D
Org-iJ
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total - P
N/D
Fccel Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Credse & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
Total Commits
Pres. Reduc. ¦ • q1 d
to fleet EPA u:>j.
FY 72 Coii.nnts
"75
73 74
76
J y 73, 74 Conniits | Expected Incr.
74
75 76 I 73 74 75
76
~rn
COMMENTS:
Tyoe of Faci 1 ity
Desiyn P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenients
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
(2)
"(3T
III
JK
73 74 75 76
74T
"T5T
W
Total Reduction
(2) + (51
73 74 75 76
PV
TTT
Region V is responsible for Administering EPA programs in Minnesota.
-------
; >v; i1 r.;/,HI Red_
, '• i1 Vi\ ill! bOUUCL American Crystal, Crookston, Minn.
r::le 53 Red Lake
PV/Vil 7/2
lAiii.i: 1
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
5 MGD
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
BOO5
125,000 #/d
TDS
N/D
TSS
25 ,200 #/d.
NH3-II
N/0
Ortj-iJ
N/D
T 01 a 1 - N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Col 1 .
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease 8 Ui1
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Pres. Redui i's.-q'd
to Meet El'A Obj.
~rrr
COi iritiiTS:
Type of Facility -
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requi rements
FY 72 Coiiiiis 1 ts
73 74 75 76
72T
FY 73, 74 Commits
74
75 76
73
Expected Incr.
74
75 76
W
7^
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
73 74 75
76
Total Reduction
w
73 74 75
76
75T
W
3.0
.5
3.0
.5
ur
7.0
Region V is responsible for administering EPA programs in Minnesota.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Comb'ned or Separate)
-------
RIVLR BASIN
Red
W."5T['.;fMER SOURCE American Crystal-E. Grand Forks, Minn.
RIVLR MILE 293 Reef"
PV/PiJ 7/2
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Flow, i'GD
PH
Temp, °F
G0D5
TDS
TSS
nh3-n
Org-N
Total -N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli .
Grease & Oil
Toxic ;ieta 1 s
Other Toxics
Present
Load
4.5
N/D
N/D
75,000 #/ day
N/D
2600 if/day
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
—m
COiiriEUTS:
Type of Facil i ty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenents
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
~W
FY 72 Commits
73
74 75 76
TTT
FY 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
(3) + (4)'
73 74 75 76
W
W
"W
757
PV
73 74 75 76
"TTT
7.0
Region V is responsible for Administering EPA programs^ in Minnesota.
-------
RIVLR BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCti Ada, Minnesota
R I V l R i'i IL E Marsh River-Red
P7/P;i 2.577"
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
.186
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
35#/day
TDS
N/D
TSS 41
41#/day
NH3- N
N/D
Org-I-;
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
HT
Pres. Reduc. iloq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
72J
FY 72 Coniiints
73 74 75 76
IV 73, 74 Commits
73
74 75 76
"W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
Total Reduction
73 74 75
76
UT
T6T
3JT
73 74
+ (5)
75
76
PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
DNA
777
2.5
COMMENTS:
Tyoe of Facility - Secondary TF
Design P.E. 4600 bgsed Qn BQD increase = hydraulic increase - there fs no expected increase in loading to stream.
Present P.E. I860
Effluent Requirements
1. 3'9#/day B0D5 (25 mg/1)
2. 47#/day TSS (30 mg/1)
3-
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
CODE 1
-------
!' |'/! ]; i, 1II Red
W.v, I: \:i\ 11 !¦: SUUKCL "Bagley, "Minnesota
;;l VLR ;;ILL Clearwater ^'"Re'cr Cake
PV/l'il 2.57T
[Mil
taste Parameter
Present
Load
F1 ow, 11GD
.13
PH
N/0
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
26 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
30 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-F'l
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Ui1
N/A
Toxic iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
ITT
Pres. Reduc. l:;;q'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
12J
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
"W
cor mmEIITS :
Type of Facility - Secondary Trickling Filter
Design P.E. 1300
Present P.E. 1250
Effluent Requi renients
1. 27#/day BOD
2. 32#/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)-Information not available
V 73, 74 Comiin t s
'3
74
75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
JK.
W
IT 74 75 76
Total Reduction
T2y
PV
73
74 75 76
1.0
.5
1.0
DiNA
74T
W
(6)
~UT
2.5
CODE 1
-------
H 1 Vi l< II AS 1 N Red
U.'iSl LV'ATLR SOURCE Bai nesvi He . Minn.
R1V!_k i'lILE Millow-Deerhorn-Buffalo-Red
P V / P ;j 2.577
TABLL
Waste Parameter
Flow, I1GD
.15
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
>
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iletjls
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
TT
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - Secondary Activated Sludge
Design P.E. - 1560
Present P.E. - 1480
Effluent Requirerients
1. 31 #/day BOD
2. 37#/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate) - Information not available
Total Commits
'Y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
(3) + (4)
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
T5T~
[27
PV
73 74 75 76
1.0
.5
1 .0
W
W
J7T
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
Hivu: I'iA'iIN
Red
W'M : ;.'A1 L'R SOURCE Breckenridge, Minn.
I1IVEI: MILE Red
Ki ver
PV/l'lJ ? R/7
Present
Pres. Reduc.
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA
Flow, MGD
.35
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
70 #/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
86 #/day
0
nh3-u
N/D
Org-/J
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TAIiLC 1
Total Commits
Total Reduction
FY 72 Coi.'.mits
73 74 75 76
FY 73, 74 Commits
"73
74
75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
73
(3) + (47
74 75 76
rrr
COIii 1E1ITS:
Tyoe of Faci 1 i ty - TF
Design P.E. 5000
Present P.E. 3800
Effluent Requi rerients
1. 73 #/day BODr
2. 88264 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer XfcasteiOeckXKx Separate)
(2)
W
"(4T
TsY
CODE 1
W
12T
W
73 74 75 76
JPV
1 .0
.5
1 .0
"TTT
DNA
2.5
-------
V! I! BASIN
Red
TABLE
WAS : Ll.'AI EK SOURCE Crookston, Minn.
RIVLi: MILE Red Lake Rivpr-RpH Bivpr 53
Pf/Pil 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
2.31
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
450 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
525 #/day
mh3-n
N/D
Ory-IJ
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
feca1 Coli .
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Ui1
N/A
Toxic Metals
" N/A
Oilier Toxics
N/A
Try
Pres. Reduc keq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j ¦
FY 72 Commits
72y
COMiiENTS:
Type of Facility - Secondary stabilization pond.
Design P.E. - 14,394
Present P.E. - 7,700
Effluent Requirertents
1. 480 #/day BOD
2. 570 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (tXXl&m&W* Separate)
Total Commits
:Y 73, 74 Commits | Expected Incr.
'3 74 75 76 ! '73 74 75 7J_
HL
331
73 74 75 76
"74T
T5T
W
Total Reduction
(2) + f5T
PV
73
74 75 76
1 .0
.5
1.0
Trr
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
RIVER CAS IN Red
WASTEWATER SO'JRCE E. Grand Forks, Minnesota
RIVER MILE Red ftTver 29.3
PV/Ril 2.5/7
TABLE 1
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, riGD
2.25
PIH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
20.5 mg/1
387 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
25 mg/1
465 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Co 1i.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
COMMENTS:
Type of Faci 1 ity
TiT
Pres. Reduc. R^q'd
to Meet EPA OI).i ¦
T2T
FY 72 Coiiiiints
73 74 75 76
W
IY 73, 74 Commits
"73 74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
73
Total Commits
(3) + W
74 75 75
Total Reduction
T5T"
12T
73 74 75 76
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
DM
W
"TsT
T6T
T7J
2.5
Type ot hacuity - 2nd Stabilization Pond
Design P.E. - 14000 n The effi uent quality should remain the same assuming that the BOD increases at a rate
Present P.E. 7600 0f i7#/c/d and the hydraulic flow increases at a constant rate (100 g/d/c)
Effluent Requirements
Requi rer.ients
1• 25 mg/1 - 468#/day
2. 30 mg/1 - 561 if/day
Type Sewer (£xmtoonebootx Separate)
CODE 1
-------
niyii! p.asin Red
V¦,111)/\111: s'UUkU " Fosston, Minn.
I; 1 Vi i; [in r Poplar"Ri"ver-Sand "fill 1-Red River
l'V/C|J_ _ 2,5/TlL ,
Present
Waste Parameter Load
TAIil
Flow, riGD
8.19
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
858 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
1395 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TT)
Pres. Reduc.. U^q'd
to Meet EPA ()!).j -
T2T
FY 72 Cor.innL'-
7 b ""
" I"" V Y 73 . 7_1 j;ciiniM_i_ts_ J__ ExpecU-d incr.
73 74
76
73 " 74"" 75 76
"T3f
W
COMMENTS:
TyDe of Facility - 2nd Trickling Filter, waste stabilization ponds.
Design P.E. - 27,000 Population increase to BOD and SS loading of stream will
Present P.E. - 12,443 1 be offset by increase in hydraulic loading.
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 1710#/day
2. 30 mg/1 2070 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (Goroixw>®dxacfc Separate)
73 74 7b 76
T5T
lota 1 _Conmii ts_
T3) • ' V)
73 74
75 76
ley-
Total Reduction
Wl
T2T
73 74 75 76
1.0
.5
1 .0
DM
VT
2.5
CODE 1
-------
171 i: i;A:.Ii'J Re.cL
1-! *S 1 i.l1 LK bDUisLL Fosston. Minn.
TAI'.LI J
III V,Li! iHLC Poplar River-Sand Hill-Red River
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. ivq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Coiiinii ts
IV 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
PV
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, ilGD
1.45
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
9000 £/day
8700 #/day
8700 if/day
8700 #/day
8700 #/day
1.0
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
10500 #/day
10136 £/day
10136 #/day
10136 ?/day
10136 #/day
1.0
rm3-N
N/D
0rtj-M
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coll.
N/D
Greaso & (Ji 1
N/A
DNA
Toxi c Iletal s
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
I5T
TH (2) (37
COi'ii' iCiiTS:
Type of Facility - Pre-aeration basin followed by WSP, assume 2500 ppm potato waste which makes up .9 MGD (est.)
Design P.E. - 2170 (information very incomplete. This is only estimate. They are
Present P.E. - 1684] scheduled to do something about 2 x flow overload in 1974).
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - 300#/day
2. 30 mg/1 - 55 - 354.35 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (fccw^xtedoorx Separate)
(67
177
2.5
-------
Ml 7LP. i'/>SINj Red
TABLE
HA5T::¦!ATlR SOUKCE Frazee, Minn.
P.IVlR MILE Otterton-Red
PV/PiJ 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Flow, "GD
.3
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
60 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
69 if/day
nh3-m
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fccal Coll.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease S Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Ueq'd
to Meet EPA Ub.i.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
TTT
Tr
W
COmmENTS:
Type of Facility - 2nd Stabilization pond
Design P.E. 600
Present P.E. 500
Effluent Requi rerients
1 63 #/day BOD
2. 75 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (S&mbrtwetfxai* Separate)
Total Commits
Total Reduction
l:Y 73, 74 Commits
"73 74 75 76
74T
Expected Incr
73 74 75 76
HI
m
73 74 75 76
HI
T5T
PV
73 74 75 76
1.0
.5
1.0
~WT
W
~UT
2.5
CODE 1
-------
R 1 .'Lt'. !i;\S III Red
i-.Y.Slt"71£"SOURCE Hallock, Minn.
RIVER MILE Middle Fork of Two Rivers-Red
PV/Pi! 2.5/7
TABLE I
Total Commits
Waste Parameter
Flow, f'.GD
.15
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Focal Coli .
N/D
Total Col l .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
TtT
Pres. Reduc. Uoq'd
to Meet EPA Gbj.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
w
FY 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
T4T
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
T5T
(3) + (4)
73 74 75 76
T6T
Total Reduction
T5T~
W
73 74 75
76
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
irr
DNA
2.5
comhE;:ts:
Type of Facility - 2nd trickling filter
Design P.E. 2-900
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirerients
1 31 #/day BOD
2. 37 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (SawhxRKdxaic Separate)
CODE 1
-------
RIVER DAS IN Red
WAjTKl.'ATER SOURCE Mahnomen, Minn.
RIVER MILE Wild Rice River-Red
PV/ Pi J 2.5/7
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.39
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
78 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
90 #/day
nh3-m
N/D
Org-M
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Petals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
(1)
Pres. Reduc. Rcq'd
to Meet EPA Qb.j.
FY 72 Cominits
73 74 75 76"
12)
ITT
COMIiEUTS:
Type of Facility - Sec. Staui1ization pond.
Design P.E. 1500
Present P.E. 1 300
Effluent Requirements
1. 81 #/day BOD
2. 96 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (GoiBbooadxaK Separate)
Total Commits
i!Y 73, 74 Commit_s_
73 74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
in
14T
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)
73 74 75
76
"PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
DNA
iw
15T
W
ITT
2.5
CODE 1
-------
i IVI i: III Red
W¦ ¦ ¦. i i !:/> 1! K jL'UIxLL Haw]_^_LMi_nnesota„
iai'.i r t
•IVLP. "ILL Buffalo-Red
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. U^q'd
to Meet EPA 0!>j.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
Flow, flGD
.39
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
78 */day
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
90 #/day
0
0
Nll3-N
N/D
Org-H
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
1
Total Col i.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
i
1:Y 73, 74 Commits
73
74 75 76
TTT
CO'i'iCITS: .
Type of Facility - 2nd Stabilization Pond
Design P.E. 3000
Present P.E. 2500
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 81 ir/day BOD
2. 96 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
w
Expected Incr. _
73 7~4 75 76
757
73
Total Commits
i3r + (?r
Total Reduction
74 75 76
W
"(27
157
73 74 75 76
PV
1 .0
.5
1 .0
UT
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
rivr.R —
RI7lR MILE Red River
PV/P
TABLE I
2.5/7
te Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, ilGD
2.7
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
816 #/day
B0D5
N/D
TDS
960 #/day
TSS
N/D
NH3-N
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total - P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Petals
N/A
Other Toxics
| N/A
ITT
Total Commits
|Pres. RedTiC . !icq' d
to Meet EPA Ob.j ¦
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
r"Y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76~
Expected Incr
73 74 75 76
73
(3) +~pry
74 75 76
727
"W
T^T
Total Reduction
(T) H pv
"W
73 74
75 76
II. 0
.5
ll.O
T5T
16T
"TtT
DNA
2.5
C0:ii iEMTS :
Tyoe of Facility - Activated Sludge
Design P.E. 75,000
Present P.E. 46,000 (including ind. flow)
Effluent Requirements
1. 1190 #/day BOD
2. 1420 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (ftoxifcMXDeckxwx Separate)
CODE 1
-------
I;/' ¦, {f] Red
'iAll.U SUUKCl "PeTTcan"Rapids"
;i 11 E Pe 1 i can Ri ve r
2.577
TAIil I 1
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc
to Meet EPi"
Flow, !1GD
.15
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30#/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 §/day
0
Nll3-N
N/D
Org-[J
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Focal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
l;'; q1 d
FY 72 Coinnn ts
"7 5
73 74"
ITT
COMMENTS :
Type of Facility - 2nd Trickling Filter
Design P.E. 1600
Present P.E. 1350
Effluent Requirerients
1. 31 #/ day
2. 37 §/day SS
3.
Type Sewer GCxwitwxte&xxx Separate)
ITT
76"
l"Y 73, 74 Commits
"73 74 75 76
ExpecLcd Incr.
73 74 75 76
W
W
73
Total Commits
3HZZJ2L
74 75 76
Total Reduction
HI
73" 74
W
PV
75 76
1.0
.5
1.0
~UT
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
r. B",SIH Red,
TABLE I
1!-\S1 E'.'ATER SOURCE Roseau. Minn.
R1VLR mfLE Roseau River-Red in Canada
PV/PII 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc
to Meet EP
Flow, i'IGD
.114
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
120 §/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
150 #/day
0
Nll3-N
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Col 1 .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
FY 72 Coiii.iii ts
73 74 75 76
"V 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
rrr
CO!'"EilTS:
Typo of Facility - Primary Imhoff
Design P.E. 3500
Present P.E. 2300
Effluent Requirenents
1. 237 #/day BOD
2. 285 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer Cuxobooedoor Separate)
W
~wr
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
73
Total Commits
(3) + (4T
74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2) + (5T~
73
74 75 76
PV
1 .0
.5
1 .0
T5T
W
J7T
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
"Sit
Red,
i; \ ',i\ i [!' SOURCE Rpd Lake Falls. Mi nn.
RiVLi-i 111 LEI Clearwater R.-Red Lake-Red River
TABLE I
!'V,
2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.42
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
51 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
63 #/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic fietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Pres. Reduc. Ilcq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
TT
COfii-IEiiTS:
Tync of Facility WSP - secondary
Design P.E. 1700
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirerients
I . 87 #/day BOD'
2. 105 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (:Ocx>tK*i!et*>tK- Separate)
"T2T
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75"
76
13T
73, 74 Commits
74
75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
T3T~r-(4T'
73 74 75 76
747
W
"W
Total Reduction
T5T
W
73
74 75 76
PV
1.0
.5
.0
VT
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
I'] 711 I IN Red
WV l!'!\nK SO UK 1.1 Thief River Fails
!•; 1 VLi-: iill.L Rpd Lake River-Red River
P// 2.5/7
IAI1LI 1
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.65
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
130 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
152 #/day
NH3- U
N/D
Orcj- N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TTT
Pres. Reduc. !Vq'd
to Meet EPA O'j.j.
T2T
FY 72 Coiiiiu 11s
73 74 75 76
W
I'Y /3, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
W
Expected Incr.
73
74 75 76
T5T
Total Commits
HI
SE
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
HL
73 74
"+~75T
75
J6Y
TTT
CO! 11 IE'ITS :
Type of Facility - 2nd Trickling Filter
Design P.E. 12800
Present P.E. 10700
Effluent Requirements
1. 135 #/day BOD
2. 162 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (£xw±Mxi»ckxKx Separate)
CODE 1
76
¦ PV
1.0
.5
1.0
DNA
2.5
-------
•/? r ftu-n—Fttd -f rr€i"> f-aj}
Lf\Jsr&\r crcmbit Q
W W TP ^
s.
&
~D
«\>
(V
WC.i")n^ -f"<7 v
one
WIA
1
I
WTP /^\
^a^peicn( l
£Wr Jan pCl,jir
Co. ~
o>
r* « ««* •» _
N"1 wS U
A "*
u_
h
5 ^
° ^
o»
CQ
v\
£ cL
* t-
is £
LL
~o
^-a
o? h
C '5
* ->
&
Fair moan f
WWTP ~
->
A
0+t-cc /^/'l Ri'/zr
"R;ve»- MiU 5*49
¦Beis de S'/^itx fsii/er
hlcr-fh Dakcra
S-b^.i' e 'Line ^
S> c nth V>aIccfc^
<£{-&+& Line
Legend
Sampling Siaf/'cns
Minnesota
S -ta-be
Line
-T7VsJ'-S ci j^ake.
O C)i
y
pJoh '¦ M? h -bo S'ca U
-------
QfCvncI berks,
A1 Inn kohl^R
& rand Forks
U. S. /-)ir Fore e
Base.
/\ Pi I Is bury
£¦¦ Grand
paries Iv'^TP
Goose K'/Ve. r
cr
a.
*A
l*.
-v
O
—V-
£
i
M --
A '-<-
"-z.
ZS
^ "3:
-e
^ !v,
OQ vi
»
A t
^ "Z.
rs
C\_
K
£
_>-
V
<3
>
a.
CL
ia
~^5
h
\~
£
?
2
S-
•<3
>-
^ o
*T
' ^
•o
. -V
Ll
£
-V-
'.'^0
t c
\A
*S\
n c l^i' s / >'n y Sj-ah'cn
O C t f-y
flm in'ca*
Crysta.1 S~:
x —*
c
C
M
£
c
o
LI
R«fd l^ake Ri^zf
n
^ t
^ s
?
f
A
Wi'M R,'ce 1?/Vv>
>
oZ
~o
-
I
*K
V)
Sn -f-f a I
-------
aT
a.
•¦j
-c
Pembina wwtP
Un /'/d
N
c C\ W vVTt
A
Dray-/-.
/?w •*/ t'CVrv
/?rv,c4-^ / 5\ 1 / /i /*
-¦/-"-I —'/-"
a
£
£
V
-v
c£
_L
Ci.
t-
c
o
—i-
c-t-
<3
JL
F<2 r IR/ A? f
i?,V*r
7W//e S&&
220
eycnd
A Sampling Slatt'on
O Ci'f
y
I v e r M11 £ > 8
k
\>
V.
^0
Rl'A 30&
£
1 ive
R.-Vd^s
,
-------
o ^ ^ 1 j'
^ C r ys hi I S^jcir
—Moor hc'ct d
fimt si can
&>\ar
V'td fice/i^r A
Rltr crcmL'ie (j)
W W t p **j
1
¦>
&
~T3
cy
u.
s:
<*j
-K
I/)
'wrp \
Wahpefonf J
O-H-cr Tail Pcuis
Co.
y >
° ^
akctc^
Sj-A+t Line
A
O-hi-cr tail Ri'/zr
"R'/Ver Mill S4-£\
Sciz cle S/Vifx ^/V e /-
-------
POLLUTION SOURCES WITH PV > 3
1. American Crystal Sugar (Dfayton)
2. Armour Food - Fargo
3. American Crystal Sugar, C^ookston
4. American Crystal Sugar, Moorhead
5. American Crystal Sug-, E. Grand Forks
|
6. Fargo WWTP - Fargo
7. Union Stockyards - West Fargo
8. Fargo Water Filtration Plant (Fargo)
9. Minnkota Power Corp. (Grand Forks)
10. Otter Tail Power Co. (Wahpeton)
11, Pi ! "i <;hirrv/ fn>-ri - firsnrt rnrlec
PV
9.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
"5 n
-------
SECTION E
Ambient W.Q. Status
-------
CEITY 3AS CCOJ.lPLiSMMEJiTS: AWiliAL WQ ACCOf.'PLJSH.'ilEflTS REP02T
VIII
CALENDAR YEAR19 72_
!P££ED flY Terry L. Anderson
({lame)
:uCT) IIYl.
(k'amej
AREA
POPULATION
TOT,US ; •
L FtHSSjI'Y BASINS
ir.i KECICJJ
i-r-j _ R(-Sd Ri ver
ma mTteiiTonTy
lie | r', ou ra ry
S n .Rod Lake Tributa ry
Pcirk Tributary
. General Engineer
(Titlij
DATE SflSarKtt. Sep. 1972
T EL
(TitlcJ
(Initial
rim STANDARDS
(MILES ANI»/0a
1 "¦
152
280
120
1 70,-
river u.irs o.^ a^a
m mis,
ESlWfZS, ETC.
:;0T ATSTMDAfiCsj WSW TOT/IS {'Mil A^O/OS AREA)
(rants mm — -
AEEfi) ( 0171biilts
area i:k Tota-1 Ba*>iT1
240
25
£.r,i
ND 247,000
Minn.251,000
Tot. 500,000
392
305
53
15
173
85
522*
333*
... I l :
tstima-tes - also excludejall tributaries jvhere a water poij
iution problem wis not detected.
955*
ND 19170 Sq.Mi.
Minn, ir-1/2 total
total = 38340 sq,'
Of
-------
I
TABLE II - AMBIENT WATER QUALITY AT I'J'AKEST DOWNSTREAM MONITORING* STATION
Page 1 of 3
Red River of tho North Basin
Data from STORE!"
IiAi IC PARAKKT2R3 - KG/L UHKHE APPLICABLE
FLOW
PH
.TEMP
xxtfrc
DO
TDS
T£ .5
NII3-NO3
ME
TOTAL
P
UN VALUE 01
(FECAL)
(TOTAL)
FACT.
LY
GREASE
i OIL
TOXIC
METALS
.Wl„.
BOD
5-Day
sits •
EASE
flg:-:
cojr.cjjs ant) r.:-;.
Bois De Sioux River 68-72
RM 56
Wahpeton 380012 (ND)
6.8
8.0
8.7
0.0
9.6
29.0
5.2
9.9
13.5
200
452
1055
-
-
-
44 MFM-FCt
3382 MFIME
R -
NDO
Mj/JL
1.5
3.9
10.6
Red River Sz=L\w-12
05051510
Wahpeton (EPA-USGS.)
15
442
2000
6.0
8.1
8.9
0.0
9.5
27.0
5.5
9.8
15.2
232
311
448
0 0
.2 .2
.9 1.3
¦ .1
.2 "
.4
250 MFM-FC
3560 MFIMf
BR
NDO
Arsenic
0
2.3
7.0
.8
2.7
5.7
Red River RM446(68-72)
380002
Fargo (ND)
7.0
7.8
8.5
0.0
9.9
26.0
$s>
13.5 ¦
284
414
553
3265 MFM-f
(90960>IFU
CBR
ENDO
1.3
7.0
16.0
Red River />7 44! (69-72)
05054020
Below Fargp' (EPA-USGS)
IS
606
.4120.
7.1
<&
0.0
9.8
27.0
12.4
282
384
743
0 0
1.3 .5
11.8 2.7
.3
1.5
13.0
2400 MFM-f
f27080)MFIf
CBR
ENDO
Ar sgni c
3.5
8.0
3.1
8.4'
34.0
Red River ,£>7274 (69-70)
RRRR 274
Oslo, Minn. (Minn.)
7.6
8.0
8.3
0.0
2.4
13.0
8,7
10.4
12.8
2.0
33.3
440
.0. O
.2 .2
.k .8
.3
.4
.7
4230 MP NEC
(f518fl)MPN
MED
COMP
.9'
2.9
15
Red River /?A/-2-&(67-72)
05082500'
Grand Forks (USGS)
742
4780
47500
7.2
7.7
8.3
0
8.2
26.0
J
208
330
471
O
.3'
2.0
.03
: 03
.03
Arsgni c
3.9
13.0
|
Red River 68-72 )
360003
Grand Forks (ND)
7.2
7.9
8.8
0
9.1
24.0
&
14.1
320
533
1240
.2
.5
1.0
41 MFM-FCt
3970 MFIME
R
NDO
1.1
3.4
17.0
Red River 4^3 (69-70)
260505
Perley, Minn. (Minn.)
7.1"
•7.9
8.6-
0.0
2.5
13.0
12.2
2.0
" 18.2
148
O O
.7 .5 "
1.5 1.1
.4
.7
1 1
11100 MPNE
(4740fl>MPN
CMED
COMP
1.4
7.5
54
-------
i
TABLE II - AMBIENT W/.TEH QUALITY AT ;'!!/VREST DOWNSTREAM MONITORING' STATION
PAGE 2 of 3
Red River of the North Basin
ba-Tic parameters -¦ kg/l \jviKhl: aivlicaule
FLOW,
PH
.TEMP
' °C
DO
TD3
TS 3
NH3-IO3
ME
TOTAL
P
\N VALUE Or
(FECAL)
(TOTAL)
TACT,
1LY
GREASE
& OIL
TOXIC
METALS
mgLI...
BOD
5-Day
| ST?3.
EASE
FLO'..'
¦¦..'..'A AM) H,;-'.
Red River i'M^-8 (63-72)
380004
Drayton, N.D. (NO)
7.0
7.8
8.7
0
9.2
25.0
320
455
800
.1
.3
.5
190 MFM-FC
BR
n nn
fa/*-
0.3
2.6
* 7
Red River R/YI/sg (68-72)
380005
Pembina, N.D. (ND)
6.5
7.8
8.7
0
9.0
24.5
6.1
9.6
14.3
285
485
1040
.1
.3
.9
122 MFM-FC
1430 MFIM1
BR
NDO
0.4
2.9
10.0
Wild Rice RiJ^r' US (67-72)
05053000
Abercrombie (USGS)
.05
111
9260
7.1
7.9
8.6
0
10.8
25.0
no
1080
2840
0
.2
1.9
Phos-D
. 1
Wild Rice River^ ^(68-72)
380006
Cayuga, N.D. (ND)
7.4
7.9
8.3
0.0
7.4
24.0
6.2
9.9
11.9
560
962
1880
'.6
.6
.6
10 MFM-FC!
343 MFIMEf
R
DO
3.4
5.7
10.3
Otter Tail, N'V-'- (64-69)
RR0T-1
1 Mile from Mouth (Minn)
7.2
7.8
8.6
.5
15.5
26.7
6.1
8.7
13.6
290
333
380
12
73
230
0 U
.1 .2
.4 1 .0
. 1
.2
.4
1730 MPNEt
2470.-MPN (
MED .5
.5
ONF .5
Arseni c
5.0
1.5
3.2
4.8
Sheyenne Ri ver'x/1'-^(69-72)
05060600
Near Harwood, N.D. (USGS)
30
420
3200
7.1
8.0
8.6
0
9.6
24.5
; 13.6
260
600
965
0
.5
1.3
.1
' .4
1.0
Mrsem c
0.0
7.4
20
.5
3.8
25.0
Sheyenne fyh'!ac (68-72)
38ff007
Lisbon, N.D. (ND)
6.9
7.9
8.8
0
9.5
24.0
5.0
10.1
15.4
310
630
1840
.2
.4
1.4
400. MFM-FC
4000 MFIME
BR
NDO
1.4
4.1
16.0
Sheyenne (\/>) (67-72 )
05058700
Lisbon, N.D. (USGS)
16
290
4270
7.3
7.8
8.4
0.0
8.4
?8.fl
293
555
R?n
'
0
1.4
K 7
Phos-u
0
.1
•
0
26:$
-------
I
TABLE II
\
- AMBIENT WATER QUALITY AT AHEST DOWKSTREAM MONITORING STATION
Red River of the North Basin
PAGE 3 of 3
3.A3IC PARAMETERS - MC/L UJiLRE APPLICABLE
FLOW
PH
.T^-IP
DO
TDS
IS .3
NH3-NO3
M
TOTAL
P
:an val.onl
(FECAL)
(total)
PACT.
y
CREA.SE
& OIL
to:< ic
METALS
BOD
5-Day
STl>3.
rA3Z
FLO'.:
¦ ¦ v;--{ r.:-\
Sheyenne f?M/O - (69-70)
370013
North of West FaraofND)
7.0
8.0
8.4
0
2.7
12
13.9
2.0
24.0
1R4
0 0
.4 .3
2.2 1.3
.2
.4
1.6
1550 MPNEC
3250 MAN C
¦1ED
0MP
^3/1
.4
3.9
14.0
Goose River M/*VS (69-70)
05066500
Hi 11 sboro , N.D. (USGS)
2
40
273
7.5
7.8
8.4
0
8.5
24.0 -
820
1160
1520
Goose River IsMlS (71-72)
380027
Hi 11sboro, N.D. (ND)
7.3
7.8
8.3
0
10.4
22.0
5.2
9.6
13.1
430
704
1040
.2
.5
1.1
377 MFM-FC
6670MFIMEI-
BR
DO
1.7
2.5
4.4
Pembina River 4/1?40(68-72)
380011
Walhalla, ty'. D. (ND)
7.0
7.9
8.7
0
8.5
25.0
V072
14.3
280
576
800
-.1
.4
.8
27 MFM-FCE
1240 MFIME
R
ND0
.6
2.6-
6.1
Pembina Ri ver AvU>7<9(67-72)
05099600
Walhalla, N.D. (USGS)
10
615
6680
6.9
7.8
8.5
0
6.6
25
•
245
529
1200
WO3
0
.7
7.7
HhOg-L)
.4
3.9
Arsenic
0.0
4.0
10.0
Red Lake Ri ver /\V"^-SiC(64-65)
RRRL-56CBB14A55
56 Miles from Mouth (Minn)
7.1
7.7
8.9
.5
14.6
24,. 4
6.4
8.1
^ 10.8
14
167
920
.0^
.1
,3
.1
' .5
2.5
402 MPNEO'
1492 MPN C
ED
0NF
2.0
k.3
6.8
-------
SECTION F
Tactical Solutions
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN - SUMMARY '
PAGE 1
SITUATION ANALYSIS
About .half of the Red River Basin falls
within Minnesota which is under the
jurisdiction of EPA Region V. Three of
the largest dischargers in the basin are
located in Minnesota. They are American
Crystal Sugar at Crookston, E. Grand
Forks and Moorhead. There are about
20 municipalities with populations larger
than 1000 which discharge their treated
municipal wastes to the Red River Basin.
Some of these receiving waters are
primary recreation areas.
To date, our contacts with Region V and
t ie Minnesota State Department of Health
have not-yielded the information we need
to adequately assess the water quality
problems for the entire basin and to
develop an accomplishment plan strategy
that w.ill manage the water quality of the
entire basin.
Although Region VIII does not propose to
develop work loads for Region V, the
general needs in the Minnesota portion of
the Basin have been included herein in
order to .provide a complete picture of the
problem.-
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Meet with the Regional Administrator for
Region V and come to an agreement which
will inculcate a working relationship be- .
tween the two regions for all programs in
the Red River Basin. (Management Division-
R.A.'s Office)
(2) Inventory all point sources of water pol-
lution in the Minnesota portion of the
Red River Basin.
(3) Analyze the water quality impact of each
source and assign an allowable waste load
• to each.
(4) Obtain commitment letters from industry
which bind the industry to a specified
loading limitation to be accomplished
through an implementation schedule.
(5) Assess the discharge practices of wastewater
treatment plants in Minnesota and recommend
alternative methods which would improve
water quality throughout the discharge period.
(6) Review .'Minnesota water quality standards to
determine their adequacy in light of pending
legislation and compatibility with North
Dakota's standards.
(7) Influence North Dakota to conduct meaningful
0&M studies and sampling program for waste-
water treatment plants in the basin. (A&W DIV
Program Support and Program Planning Branches)
(S&A Div.-Surveillance and Tech. Support Br.)
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
NOV 72
OCT 72
JAN 73
MAR 73
OCT 72
MAY 73
MAY 73
JAN 73
NOV 72
DEC 72
FEB 73
JAN 74
MAY 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
FEB 74
II II
FEB 73
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
5T1214
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
2B1143
2B8163
2B8162
2B2147
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
.2
.3
.2
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PHOF - MAN -MPS)
1.0
.2
O
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
PAGE 2
SITUATION ANALYSIS
During winter months, the majority of the
Red River of the North is covered with
ice. As a result, the DO and coliform
concentrations in the river do not meet
state standards. To improve this con-
dition, several industrial and municipal
wastewater treatment plants have been or
are being expanded and upgraded. However,
some of these projects are behind schedule.
The Denver Field Investigations Center (DFIC)
is committed to a water quality survey cover-
ing previously sampled stations on the Red
River during 1965 and 1969-1970. Through a
comparison of results from earlier studies,
this study should determine whether the
exoected imorovement in water quality has
occurred as a result of the upgrading of
wastewater treatment facilities at Fargo, N.D.
Moorhead, Minnesota, and Abercrombie, N.D.
The DFIC survey will take place prior to the
completion of all new construction and
therefore, an additional water quality survey
will be required to document compliance with
standards.
RECOf-G-ENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(8) Establish a joint monitoring system of in-
stream water quality effluent discharges.
(Enforcement Div.-Permits and Enforcement
Branches)
(1) Encourage state and municipalities to expedite
plant construction. (A&W Division - Planning
Branch and Municipal Wastewater Branch)
(2) Coordinate with DFIC on this survey so that
appropriate action may be taken if expected
improvements do not materialize. Any necessary
.follow-up may include T&M surveys, operator
training or upgrading of facilities. (S&A
Division - Technical Support Branch)
(3) Perform water quality survey and make compara-
tive analysis with the 1965, 1969-1970, and
1972-1973 studies. (S&A Division-Technical
Support Branch)
(4) Initiate a comprehensive stream and effluent
survey to determine a nutrient balance in
the Red River of the North. Suggest recom-
mendations for a control program as required
by an analysis of survey results. Control
programs recommended may include agricultural
runoff control or nutrient removal by point
sources. (Technical Support Branch-S&A
Di vi si on)
DATES
INITIATION COXPLETIO:
OCT 73
JUL 72
DEC 72
DEC 73
SEP 73
JUN 76
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 74
JUN 74
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - I'UN - IlOSl
FY 73
3B2124
2B2147
2B3149
2B8162
2B5154
2B5154
2B5154
.05
.05
0.5
0 10
i
FY 74-| FY 7j | f Y 76
5.0
2.5
.2
1.0
1.0
0 0
0 1 0
1
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
PAGE 3
RED RIVER BASI^l SUM'IARY - Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
A recomnandation of the 1965 Conference con-
cerning pollution of the Red River of the Nortl
was that nutrient concentrations in the river
should be determined and sources located to
prevent excessive algae growth and subsequent
water quality degradation. Nutrients are
thought to enter the river from point sources
(industry and municipalities) as well as non-
point sources (agriculture).
Also, the Red River Basin is characteristic in
that low flows are common and waste discharges
generally occur during spring and fall. North
Dakota water quality standards do not apply fo
DO during the processing season for agricultur.
products if flows fall below the lowest 10% of
all monthly flows of record for either the
months of April or May. This DO Standard is
not identical to "innesota but each applies to
the main stem of the Red River.
A significant amount of water quality data is
continuously being gathered at Federal, State,
and other sampling stations in the Red River
Basin. Additionally, situations occasionally
arise when further data and/or onsite inspec-
tion is required for verification of discharges
All available data is not readily available for
use in analyzing water quality needs or improve
ments.
Several treatment facilities are being designee
to hold treated wastes during the winter and
discharge them during the following spring.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(5)
Review N.D. water quality criteria and use
classifications to determine their adequacy
and resolve differences between N.D. and
Minnesota.
Obtain data from the collecting agency, code
and insert into STORET system, and review
program. Also, make on-site inspections to
verify discharges. (SSA-Surveillance Branch)
Analyze the water quality of the Basin
using a simplified math model. The model will
¦reflect water quality throughout the basin
based upon low flow, waste loadinn, instream
water quality standards, and existing in-stream
water quality. (A&W Div.-Proaram Planning
Branch). Update in FY 74.
Utilize DFIC's proposed survey and S&A's
survey to see what improvements are being
made in the water quality as wastewater control
facilities are put into operation and to
determine the effects of soring discharoe on
water quality. (A&W Division-Program Plannina-
Planning-Proqram Support Branches)
(9) Reconvene the Enforcement Conference and
publish report.
(lO)Follow-up on the recommendations cominq forth
from the Enforcement Conference.
(11) Follow-up on the compliance schedule of Fargo's
180-day notice.
(7)
(8)
DATES
PROGRAM
>1A.\-PCT..:Z
R REQ'JI
REjj
INITIATION
COMPLETION
ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
:io5)
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY
May 73
Jun 73
2B1143
See Pa<
e 1, Su
Dtask
6.
SEP 72
JUN 76
2B2146
1
1.5
2.
2
2B2148
SEP 72
OCT 73
2B3149
1.0
1.0
SEP 73
OCT 73
2R8162
.25
2B3149
.40
2B4153
.25
FEB 73
SEP 74
3B1123
5.0
3.0
3B1124
2.0
1.0
SEP 74
JUN 76
3B1123
0
2.5
1.5
1.0
SEP 74
JUN 76
3B1124
0
1.6
.8
.8
SEP 72
JUN 73
3B1123
.30
.2
SEP 72
JUN 73
j
2B8102
.15
.1
1
j
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
PAGE 4
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTION'S
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
D.-xTIS
INITIATION
;
C:3'_ETI~5n ' ELEMENT
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN - SUMMARY Continued
Page 5
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Fully developed water quality management
plans are being developed for the Red
River Basin end Fargo-Moorhead SMSA by
North Dakota and Minnesota. Little
Coordination has been established between
the two states, Region V and Region VIII.'
Existing legislation calls for the approval
of fully developed water quality manage-
irent plans by July 1, 1373. New legis-
lation extends this date to July 1974 and
requires that areawide planning agencies ¦
bs designated to conduct water quality
planning. North Dakota does not have
the planning capability to fulfill the
desired role set forth in the new legis-
¦ 1 ati on.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Establish inter-region inter-state and
inter-community cooperation and coordination
for developing an integrated water quality
management plan for the Red River Basin to
be conducted on a continuing basis. (A&W
Division-Program Planning Branch)
(2) Monitor the progress of the water quality
management plans to assure adequate coverage
and detail which will satisfy the require-
ments of 40CFR35. (A&W Division-Program
Planning Branch)
(3) • Provide assistance to North Dakota and
Minnesota as it is needed to fulfill the
basin planning requirements.
(A&W Division-Program Planning Branch)
(4) Review of the Basin Plan for the Red River
of the North and the Metropolitan Plan for
Fargo-Moorhead on an intra-aqrency basis.
Assure consistency with Minnesota portions.
(5) Approve the water quality management plans
for the Red River Basin and the Fargo-Moorhead
SMSA.
(6) Assess impact of new legislation upon Water
Quality Management planning and Facilities
Management Grant Program.
(7) Work with Region V, HUD, States, and Fargo-
Moorhead SfISA to plan the best strategy for
creating districts that could do water
quality management planning under the new
leaislation. (A&W Div.-Program Planning Br.)
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
NOV 72
SEP 72
SEP 72
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73
JUL 73
SEP, 73
JUN 73
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUL 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUL 73
MAY 73
SEP 73
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
¦^2B3149
Reg. V
2B3149
Reg. V
2B3149
Reg. V
-2B3149
-206117
j 3B1123
3B2124
•-2B5154
Reg. V
2B3149
}2B3149
2B3149
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
.5
.4
.9
.3
.3
.4
.3
.50
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - HQS)
6 -.3
.6
.4
.3
-------
TABLE XII - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 6
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Arerican Crystal Sugar - Drayton, N.D.
Past discharges of flume water have created
excessive organic and solids loading. At
the last formal reeling with EPA on June 29,
1972, ACS agreed to operate a closed
flume system for the 72-73 campaign in order
•to reduce the BOD5 leading. RAPP guidelines
limit BCD5 to 0.5 lb/ton of sliced beet.
.'.CS believes that this is an- unreal istic
ricure because spray irrigation would have
to be used exclusively to meet the require-
ments. Therefore, they feel 1.0 lb/ton
\-epresents the best practicable treatment.
The plant uses total containrrent during
winter months and utilizes the "spring flush"
technique to drain their lagoons. No dis-
charge under ice cover is permitted under
SPA guidelines.
RED RIVER BASIN siIMMflPY - rnntinued
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Continue to meet with company to settle
disagreement on BOD5 loading limitation.
(2) Obtain additional commitment letter.*
(3) Monitor stream and effluent to detect
pollution levels.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
SEP 72
MAR 73
SEP 73
MAR 73
JUN 73
MAR 75
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
3B2124
3B2124
3B2123
3B2123
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
.30
.30
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MPS)
.2
0.05
\merican Crystal Sugar, Moorhead, Minn.
ACS at Hoorhead is a major contributor of
5OD5 and TSS to the Red River. However,
Region V is responsible for working with
"his company to establish an effluent re-
^;uirerrent that will be compatible with
:n-stream water quality criteria. To date,
,'uch a limitation has not been established.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota,
and industry to agree upon effluent
limitations¦(should be uniform with other
Sugar Beet Hi 11s).
(2) Obtain a coimiitment letter from the industry
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and in-stream
water quality to determine impact of and
compliance with commitments.
APR 73
MAY 73
JUL 74
MAY 73
JUL 74
JUN 75
'3B2124
Reg. ,V
3B2123
3B2124
Reg. V
3B2123
Reg. V
1.0
.10
.10
.2
*These commitment actions will be converted immed-
iately into permit actions under the .new legis-
lation as soon as guidelines are available.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY, Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
' ' — ^ w . UUI II IMI\I t WVIIWII'WWM
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - "OS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 7
American Crvstal Sugar, E. Grand Forks, Minn.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota, and
APR 73
MAY 73
3B2124
1.0
industry to agree upon effluent limitations
Reg. V
ACS at E. Grand Forks is a major contributor
(should be uniform with other Sugar Beet
of BOD5. and TSS to the Red River. However,
Mills).
Region .V is responsible for working with this
company to estatlish an effluent requirement
(2) Obtain a commitment letter from the
MAY 73
JUL 74
382123
.10
that will be compatible with in-stream water
industry.*
3B2124
.10
quality criteria. To date, such a limitation
Reg. V
has not been established.
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and instream
JUL 74
JUN 75 .
3B2123
.2
water quality to determine impact of and
Reg. V
compliance with commitments.
1
American Crystal Suqar, Crookston, Minn.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota,
APR 73
MAY 73
3B2124
1 .0
1.0
and industry to agree upon effluent limi-
Reg. V
ACS at Crookston is a major contributor of
tations (should be uniform with other
BOD5 and TSS to the Red Lake River, a large
Sugar Beet Mil Is).
tributary of the Red River. However,
Region V is responsible for working with
(2) Obtain a commitment letter from the industry*
MAY 73
JUL 74
3B2123
.10
this company to establish an effluent re-
3B2124
.1
quirement that will be compatible with
Reg. V
instream water qua!ity criteria. To date,
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and instream
JUL 74
JUN 75
3B2123
.2
such a limitation has not been established.
water quality to determine impact of and
Reg. V
compliance with commitments.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Pa no 8
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY- Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Arrrour rood-West Fargo, N.D.
A dye test study by EPA on March 29, 1972,
established that some of the v.'aste discharges
fron the processing operation reach the
p Sheyenne River instead of being routed to
the Fargo Industrial Park sewage treatment
facility. Armour has discovered a cross
connection in the sewer lines and a col-
lapsed sewer line on the stream bed to be
responsible for the discharge. The company
will either install a septic tank with an
underground disposal field or make a new
connection to the industrial park facility.
EPA is encouraging the latter alternative.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Negotiate with company and encourage a
sanitary sewer hook-up.
(2) Obtain commitment letter and follow-up with
inspection.*
(3) Monitor stream and effluent to detect pol-
lution 1evels.
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
OCT 72
MAR 73
JUN 73
FEB 73
JUN 73
.AUG 73
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
'3B2124
'3B2123
3B2124
3B212 3
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 7
.90
.20
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAX -MPS)
.2
Fargo, N.D. - Wastewater Treatment Plant
Located on Red River of the North. Project
consists of improvements to the wastewater
treatnerr; facilities. Present population
approximates 53,000 and a future population
of 85,000 is projected for 1992. Currently,
the city wastewater is treated by a trickling
filter plant which provides approximately
55« reduction of BOD and SS. A six-cell,
530-acre waste stabilization lagoon system
is presently under construction to provide
further reductiofi, or tertiary treatment
of municipal wastes discharged into the
Red River of the North. Nutrient removal is
net recuired at this time.
(1) Finalize construction, Inspection, put
plant into operation. (Air & Water Div.-
Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) 0&M Inspection.
(3) Monitoring of in-stream water quality impact,
(if needed), Surveillance & Analysis)
(4) If it is determined that nutrient removal is
required based on the water quality surveys
and analyses by S&A & DFIC, influence State
and municipality to modify existing facilities*
to provide for removal through construction
grants aid. (S&A MWW Planning)
SEP 72
APR 74
APR 74
APR 74
JUL 74
Jul 74
SEP 73
APR 74
MAY 74
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
2B8162
2B8163
-2B7160
I
2B2148
3B1123
2B8162
2B3149
1.0
.30
.05
.25
.2
.2
.2
.2
**Permits for municipal facilities will be used to
these needs as required.
m;et
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 9
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Union Stockyards - Fargo
The stockyards have liquid waste treatment
facilities constructed under a Federal re-
search, development and demonstration grant
and placed into operation in April 1971.
Normal operation routes all wastes to the
two-cell lagoon. But, during the winter
months, there is no significant pen drainage
or track washing. Watering trough overflow
combines with the domestic effluet from
the seotic tank and is byoassed to the
river, eliminating the use of a lift station.
The organic loading is low (20 mg/1) and
would presumably not benefit from treatment
in the lagoon system. An acceptable treatment
of wastes during winter months is being
investigated. Complete winter retention
might be achieved by decreasing water
trough overflow.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Continue with negotiations and determine
effluent reguirements. Encourage the
company to use better water conservation
practices.
(2) Obtain letter of commitment.*
(3) Monitor Stream and effluent to detect
pollution levels.
(Enforcement Di v.--Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
DATES
INITIATION ICOMPLETION
AUG 72
JAN 73
JAN 74
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
FY 73 FY 74-1 FY 75
I
JAN 73
MAR 73
JAN 75
3B2124
3B2723
3B2124
3B2123
.4
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF MAN - MPS)
.30
.60
.25
Fargo, N.D. - Water Treatment Plant
Project consists of improvements to the
sludge handling facilities of the water
treatment plant. Currently, 40,000 lbs/day
of suspended solids (lime sludge) is being
deposited in the Red River. Project is
currently out for bids and when construction
is complete 40,000 lbs/day of inert dried
lime sludge will be deposited in the Fargo
Sanitary Landfi11.
(1) Award contract, finalize construction,
inspection, put plant into operation.
(Air & Water Div. - Minicipal Waste Water
Branch)
(2) O&M Inspection (Air and Mater Div.-Municipal
Waste Water Branch)
(3) Monitoring (if needed by S/A)
SEP 72
APR 74
APR 74
SEP 74
OCT 73
APR 74
APR 74
OCT 74
2B8162
2B8163
2B7160
2B2148
.1
1 .2
.30
.05
.30
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 10
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
DATES
PROGRAM
MAN?OWE
R REQUIRED
SITUATION ANALYSIS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
INITIATION'
COMPLETION
ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
MOS)
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 7 6
Minnekota Power Coop., Inc. - Grand Forks
(1) Continue meetings with company to develop
JUN 72
MAR 73
3B2124
1.0
satisfactory effluent requirements-RAPP
Lignite or oil is burned to produce steam
Program.
for this 21 ,500 kw electrical generation
plant. The plant normally on cold stand-by
(2) Obtain commitment letter.*
MAR 73
MAY 73
3B2123
.4
operational basis and has not been used con-
3B2124
.4
tinuously for more than five days in the past
eight years. Expected operation is 700 hrs.
(3) Monitor effluent and stream after remedial
JUN 73
JUN 76
3B2123
.4
.05
.03
per year. However, during operation, the
measures are complete.
1
discharge is high in total solids concen-
tration. Permits has obtained a letter of
(Enforcement Div.--Enforcement and Permits
commitment from the company concerning
Branches)
another plant outside this basin. Effort
will now be shifted to this Grand Forks
pi ant.
Otter Tail Power Company - Wahepton
(1) Develop effluent criteria through RAPP.
DEC 72
JUN 73
3B2124
.4
Program.
Cooling water used in this steam generation
electric olant is discharged directly to
(2) Obtain Commitment letter.*
JUN 73
SEP 73
3B2123
.3
the Red River. The increase in dissolved
3B2124
.6
salts and thermal degradation impose a
(3) Monitor effluent and stream to detect pollution
OCT 73
JUN 75
3B2123
0.05
threat to the water quality. The COE trans-
levels.
ferred a copy of their discharge permit to
EPA on March 8, 1972. There have been no
(Enforcement Di v.-Enforcement and Permits
formal meetings with personnel from this
Branches)
plant as yet to improve the quality of their
effluent. Permits anticipates active
correspondence to begin late 1972.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 11
SITUATION AI1ALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(prcf - m-.n - ::cs)
INITIATION JCOMPLETIOX
FY 73| FY 74-
FY 75l FY 7c
USDI Baldhill Dam National Fish Hatchery -
Valley City, N.D.
The COE Permit dated October 5, 1971 describes
the hatchery operation as hatching and .rearing
various species of sport fishes in warm water
ponds, feeding the fish on organisms generated
through a natural food chain in the rearing
ponds. An organic pollution problem is pos-
sible from the discharges of fish fecal materia
and unused food. To date, no formal contacts
have been made with Bureau of Sport Fisheries
concerning their conservation practices.
Inter-agency cooperation will be obtained
to safeguard each agency's interests.
(1) Obtatn commitment from Game and Fish to
observe conservation practices to minimize
pollution load.*
(2) Monitor effluent and stream to detect potential
pollution load.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
FEB 73
JUN 74
MAY 73
JUN 74
3B2124
3B2123
.40
.40
USDI Valley City National Fish Hatchery,
Valley City, N.D.
The COE Permit dated October 5, 1971 describes
the hatchery operation as hatching and rearing
various species of sport fishes in warm water
ponds, feeding the fish on organisms generated
through a natural food chain in the rearing
ponds. An organic pollution problem is
possible from the discharges of fish fecal ma-
terial and unused food. To date, no formal
contacts have been made with Bureau of Sport
Fisheries concerning their conservation
practices. Inter-agency cooperation will be
obtained to safeguard each agency's interests.
(1) Obtain commitment from Game and Fish to
observe conservation practices to minimize
pollution load.*
(2) Monitor effluent and stream to detect potential
pollution load.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
FEB 73
JUN 73
MAY 73
JUN 74.
3B2124
3B2123
3B2123
i
t
.40
.40
.40
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL 'SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 12
RED RIVER BAS'IN SUMMARY-Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
.PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
.(PROF - MAN - NOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Pil'lsbury Food - Grand Forks, N.D.
ACOE discharge permit was forwarded to
our office on April 17, 1972 for the dis-
charge of air conditioner cooling water
to'the Red River. The discharge is high
in dissolved salts. As yet there is no
State standards for DS concentrations;
therefore, reefing will be initiated in
'an 'attempt to establish a v.'orkable DS
guideline. All sanitary wastes are
diverted to the municipal STP.
(1} Meet with company and State official and
develop a DS Standard.
(2) Develop effluent concentrations for plant
through RAPP program.
(3) Obtain corrmitment letter.*
(4) Monitor stream to detect pollution levels.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits branches)
JUL 73
JUL 74
DEC 74
FEB 75
JUL 74
DEC 74
FEB 75
FEB 76'
'3B2124
¦3B2124
3B2123
3B2123
0
1.0
0.2
0.15
0.15
1
0.05
Grafton, N.D.
(1) Process grant application, make grant, review
SEP 72
OCT 72
2B8162
1.2
,
plans and specifications, begin construction.
Located on the middle fork of the Park
(Air & Water—Municipal Waste Water Branch)
River which is a tributary to Red River
of the North. The present population is
(2) Finalize construction, inspection, put plant
AUG 73
AUG 73
2B8162
1.2
approximately 6000 and a 1990 design
into operation. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
fo-recast of 7000 is expected. The City
Waste Water Branch)
is currently serviced by a two-cell
waste stabilization lagoon which is
(3) 0&M Inspection, (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
JUN 74
JUN 74
- 2B8163
organically overloaded. The treatment
Waste Water Branch)
.2B7160
. 05
project as proposed in the grant appli-
(4) Monitoring (if needed by S/A).
cation consists of a 2.25 aerated pre-
OCT 74
OCT 74
2B2148 ,
• .30
treatment lagoon to treat the organic
overload modi fi cations to existing master
(5) If it is determined that nutrient removal is
MAY 74
JUN 75
381123
.15
.2
lift station, and a new lift station with
required based on the water quality surveys and
JUL 74 '
JUN 75
2B8162
.2
.2
forced irain. P)ans and specifications
analyses by S&A and DFIC, influence the State
II II
11 II
2B3149
.3
.2
furrently being prepared. Nutrient removal
and municipality to modify facilities to provid
3
not required.
for removal through construction grants aid.**
(S&A, MWW, Planning).
-------
TABLE III -
INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 13
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Wshoe ton, N.D.
Located on Red River of North. Present
population approximates 7100 people with
4500 students attending a local college.
The projected 1992 design population
will equal 15,500 people; At present,
the '..'aste load from the community is
handled by a two-ce11 waste stabilization
lagoon and is organically overloaded. The
proposed project will consist of the
addition to the existing lagoon system of
an aerated cell. The aerated cell will
considerably reduce the organic load to
t;,e lagoon system. Project is currently
out for bids. Nutrient removal not
¦included.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Continue processing construction oriented
activities, contract award, finalize con-
struction, inspection, put plant expansion
into operation.
(Municipal Waste Water Branch-Air & Water Div.
(2) 0&M Inspection. (Air and Waler Div.-
Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(3) Monitoring if necessary by S/A.
(4) If nutrient removal is required based on the
_water quality surveys and analyses by S&A
'and DFIC, influence the State and municipality
to provide for removal through construction
grant aid. (S&A, MWW, Planning). **
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
SEP 72
MAY 74
OCT 74
JUL 74
ii 11
AUG 73
MAY 74
M ^ n
OCT 74
JUN 75
JUN 76
JUN 76
PROCRAM
ELEMENT
2B8162
'2B0163
-2B7160.
•2B2148
3B1123
2B8162
2B3149
MANPOWER REQUIRED
. (PROF MAN - MPS)
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
.30
.05
.2
.2
Abercrombie, N.D.
Located on the Red River of the North.
The 1970 population is listed at 260 with
350 people projected for 1990. Currently
the town is served by septic tanks and
cesspools. The town is presently plan-
ning a sewer system and has requested a
construction grant for a lift station with
force main and a two-cell waste stabiliza-
tion lagoon systejn. A construction grant
has been processed and plans ana sDecificp-
tions are currently being prepared.
(1) Pas review, contract award, finalize con-
struction, put plant into operation and in-
spection' of facilities.
(A&W Div.-Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) 0&M Inspection (A&W Div.-Municipal Waste
Water Branch)
SEP 72
MAY 74
JUN 73
MAY 74
2B816?
2B8163-
2B7160
1.0
.30
.05
-------
TABLE XXI - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS pag9 14
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
(PROGRAM
'ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Park River, N.D.
1 Located on the South Branch of the Park
Siver which is tributary to the Red River
of the North. The 1970 population in
Park River by official census was 1 ,680,
and by the year 1990 a population of
2,200 is anticipated. The present treat-
ment facilities consist of a one-acre
aerated lagoon followed by one 20 and one
10-acre waste stabilization ponds operated
in series. The present project consists
of.a lift station with force main which
services an annexed area previously
utilizing septic tanks. Construction on
project is'essential ly complete.
(1) 0&M Inspection.
(Air & Water Div.-Municipal Waste Water Branch)
SEP 72
11 n
OCT 72
¦ I II
2B8163
2B7160
.30 "
.05
Anenia, N.D.
(1) Pre-application review and conference.
FEB 73
FEB 73
2B8152
.2
(Air and Water Div.-Municipal Wastewater
11 11
II , II
2B3149
.2
Located on the Rush River which is tribu-
Branch, Planning Branch)
tary to Red River of the North. The town
presently 1s served by septic tanks and
(2) Processing of grant application, grant offer,
APR 73
OCT 73
2B8162
1.0
1.2
cesspools. The 1970 population was re-
P&S review, contract award, finalize con-
•
ported as 100 people with a 1990 popu-
struction, put plant into operation and
lation of 150 people expected. The pro-
inspection. (Air and Water Di v.-Municipal
posed project will consist of a sewage
Waste Water Branch)
collection system and a two-cell waste
stabilization lagoon operated in series.
(3) 0&M Inspection. (A&W Div.-Municipal Waste
MAY 74
MAY 74
;2B8163
.30
Water Branch)
II II
II M
2B7160
.05
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
Pan*3 IS
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Valley City, N.D.
Located'on the Sheyenne River which is
.tributary to Red River of the North. The
1970 city population was reported at
7,843 with the 1970 project area popu-
lation recorded at 52. The 1992 projected
city population is 10,000 with 100 people
to be served by the project area. The
project will consist of a lift station
and force main to handle waste contri-
butions from an area previously unsewered.
Ultimate treatment of sewage will be pro-
vided by a two-cell waste stabilization
lagoon system.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Continue processing construction activities,
put plant into operation, inspection.
(A&W Div.-Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) 0&M Inspection. (A&W Div.-Municipal Waste
Water Branch)
(3) If nutrient removal is required based on the
water quality surveys by S&A and DFIC,
influence State and municiplaity to provide for
removal through construction grant aid'.
(S&A, MWW, Planning).
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
AUG 72
AUG 73
AUG 73
JUL 74
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(P.^OF - MAN - MOS)
FY 73
FY 74-
AUG 72 2B8162
AUG 73
AUG 73
JUN 75
2B8163
2B7160
2B1123
2B8162
2B3149
.3
.30
.05
FY 75
0.2
0.2
0.2
FY 76
0.2
0.2
Fi ve-Year Meeds Li st
Currently, there are six projects on the
North Dakota 5-year needs list which are
in the Red River of the North drainage
basin. They are as follows:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Fargo, N.D.
Grafton, N.D.
Extension
Grand Forks,of
Valley City,!
Wahpeton, N.D
West Fargo
D Interceptor
. Systems
Assumption
no data
available
here are no new treatment needs of major signi ¦
.icance in the basin forsaen at this time with
jie possible exception of nutrient removal.
(1) Pre-application review and conference.
(Air and Water-Municipal Waste Water Branch,
Water Quality Planning)
(2) Processing of application, grant offer, P&S
review, contract award, construction,
inspection, put plant into operation.
(A&W-Municipal Waste Water Section)
(3) 0&M Inspection. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
Waste Water Branch)
(4) Provide for nutrient removal as noted pre-**
viously on a case-by-case basis.
JUN 74
JUN 74
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 76
JUN 75
JUN 76
2B8162
2B3149
2B8162
2B8163
2B7160
!. 0
1.00
.15
..6
.6
3.0
1.00
.15
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 16
SITUATION ANALYSIS
r\DU nivrn nni ni -V/Uiiniiucu _
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
• BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROCRAM
' ELEMENT
1 MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - ::os)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
(7) Assess impact of new legislation upon the
Facilities Management Grants Program.
(A&W Division-Program Planning Branch)
APR 73
MAY 73
•2B3149
.25"
State Froaram PI an :
Yearly, the EPA reviews and assesses
North Djkota's water program. A State
Program Plan is submitted to EPA as a
requirement to obtain supolemental funding
from EPA fo^ the State's program. The
p-ogram plan contains information which
can assist other EPA operations.
(1) Coordinate State Program Plans with Basin
water quality management planning and con-
struction grants (i.e., one and five year
needs list, implementation schedule, standards,
program reviews). (A&W Division-Program
Planning, Program Support Branches)
(2) Update one and five year needs list.
(3) Approve North Dakota State Program Plan
OCT 72
0CT> 72
OCT \72
1
OCT 72
OCT 72
OCT 72
SEP 72
JUN 76
JUN'76 •
JUN'76 -
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
2B3149
2B8162-
-.284153
>B8162
2B4153
2B2146
2B4153
.5
..25
.25
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.5
.25
.25
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.4
.25
.2
\
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.4
.25
.2
.3
.3
.3
.0
Construction Grants Administration:
For each new municipal waste-water facilitie
grant application, about one man-month is
spent processing the application for
administrative purposes.
(1) Process seven new applications and complete
seven others. (See page 9 of Figure 7
SEP 72
JUN 76 -
.2B8316
2.0
3.0
3.0
!.0
EIS Reviews:
Environmental assessments are written for
each construction grant project and each
water Quality management plan. They need
to be reviev.'ed to determine whether an
EIS will be needed or a negative declar-
ation can be issued.
(1) Review two water quality management plans and
seven construction grant applications.
SEP 72 1
JUN 76 ^
2B6117
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 17
\RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
• SITUATION' ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 7<
Pianino Review of Construction Grant
' AddIications:
Too often construction grant applicants
are not fully aware of the planning
assets of the proposed project. Also,
it is a Federal regulation (40CFR601)
that planning criteria be met prior to
offering a grant.
(1) Review construction grant applications for
conformance to water quality management
plan, compliance to water quality standards,
and environmental impact. (A&W Division-
Program Planning Branch)
SEP 72
JUN 76
^ 2B3149
.6
-1.3-
1 .0
.5- -
Public demand for environmental news:
The success of the environmental program
in Region VIII is dependent upon public
backing and awareness. Also, public
cooperation helps EPA fulfill its regu-
latory responsibilities. As of yet, we
have not gained the full backing of the
people we represent (e.gr.the majority
do not know that we exist).
(1) Keep the public aware of EPA activities and
environmental problems within the Red River
• Basin via the news media.
(2) Encourage Headquarters to finance the cost
of producing documentary film on water
quality management of rivers in the Rocky
Mountain Region which would include the
Red River of the North. (Management Divislon-
Public Affairs).
SEP 72
I
SEP 72
JUN 76 -
NOV 72
5T1214 '
5T1214
.5 '
.25
.5
.5 1
.5
1
Manpower and Traininq:
02M of wastewater treatment plants de-
termine whether or not plant efficiency
v:ill be maintained at their design level.
Most wastewater treatment plant operators
are not educated to operate plants
correctly. Consequently, training needs
to be provided which will fill this gap.
(1) Monitor 5(g)! training course for approx.
20 WWTP operators in Wahpeton, N.D. area.
(2) Monitor 5(g)! training coiirse for approx.
15 WWTP operators in Grand Forks,N.D. area.
(3) Continue training support in Red River of the
North area.
(4) . Coordinate Field Study Training Program
for wastewater treatment plant operators.
(5) Work with State on developing manpower
planning function.
(6) In-house manpower planning-employment and
training project.
SEP 72
JAN 73
SEP 72 ¦
SEP 7t
SEP 72
SEP 72
DEC 72 -
JUN 73 '
JUN 76 -
JUNi76
JUN'76 —
JUNi',76
-2B7158
i>2B7158
•2B7158
.2B7158
^ 2B7161
¦*2B7161
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
0.1
.2
.5
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED KIVEK bASIn SUnriARY - Cuntinued
PAGE 18
SITUATION ANALYSIS
(1) The Garrison Reservoir Water Project
will result in water being diverted to
the Red River Basin for irrigation
purposes, (projected for 1978)
(2) Authorized COE reservoir on Sheyenne
River near Kindred, N.D.
(3) Authorized COE reservoir on Wild
Rice River near Twinn Valley, Minn.
(4) Proposed COE reservoir on Pembina
River near Park River, N.D.
(5) Proposed COE reservoir on Red Lake
River near Crooks ton, Minn.
Major water resources such as these
affect water quality in the basin. Pre-
caution must be taken to minimize the
environmental detriments resulting from
each project.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Assess the water quality impact of the pro-
posed project and work with the Bureau of
Reclamation to minimize the deleterious
effects during the remaining interim
planning stages. (A&W Division-Program
Planning Branch)
(2) Coordinate with the Bureau of Recreation
in the development and/or review of the
EIS for each project. (A&W Division-
Program Planning Branch)
(3) - Evaluate the effects of each COE project's
induced flow regulation on accomplishment
plant objectives. Work with COE to minimize
the deleterious effects during the remaining
interim planning stages. (Program Planning
_Branch-A&W Division)
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
SEP 72
JAN 73
JUL 74
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76 -
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
¦ 2B3149
'2B6117
'2B3149
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
.2
.3
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - .TIPS)
1.0
1.0
.5
l.Q
Each project that uses Federal monies for
construction must be cleared under the
Equal Employment Act.
(1) Determine whether 7 construction grant pro-
jects satisfy the Equal Employment Act
requi re'ments'.
SEP 72
JUN 75
5T1214
.25
.75
.75
Each Refuse Act Permit must be processed
and put on the computer for retrieval and
inter-office use.
(1) Process Permit Applications
bank.
and Set up data
SEP 72
JUN 76
3B2124
1.0
2.2
2.0
2.0
-------
SECTION G
Point Source Reductions Required
-------
TABLE ;v - WATER QUALl'JY IMPROVEMENT TIIHOtJGU COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: American Crystal Sugar, D rayton
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
ACCREGATED ACTION I'[ L'-IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE
(SEE T
LOADS REDUCTION
MJLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
Y
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(X^-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
|
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE T)
FY j FY
72 ! 73
FY FY
7-V 75
n
it
! , (See TABLE II)
Y
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F1!
7(
,1 BOD^
Resolve problem with
BOD5 loading limitation
and monitor to assurp
65,800 If/day
607
14
2750
\
i
1 5.7 mg/l max
- V
No
ins
rear
st<
anda
id
!
compliance with
commitments.
TSS
16,171 ///day
134
10
No data
No
ins
rpan
H
D.O.
dar.-
Total Coliform
6300/100 ml (mean)
5M/
lOOl
il
*Standard changes durir
flows fall below che a.\
g agricultural products pr
erage of the lowest 10% of
ncessing season. If the
all monthly flows of
1
record for cither the it
D.O. Standard does not
onths of April or May, whi
apply.
;hever is lower, then th
e
l
i
1
i
1
i
-------
TAB I L IV - WATER QUALITY IMTKOV ICMF-^T TIIK0UU1 COMPLETION OK ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL M)l KCE OR CLUSTER Q[- SOUUCLS : American Crystal Sugar, K. Grand Fork.q
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION J1!MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
r ' ...
i
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FyI FY
7-'»| 75
Ft
76
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
i
j bod5
Work with Region V to es-
tablish effluent require-
75,000 ///day
Det
mac
ermi
e re
pat
gar
1
.on wjill
ling jnee
be
led
17 mg/1
Nc
St
N.D
anda
. in
:d.
itre
im
i
TSS
ments and obtain commit-
ments.
2,600
red
ucti
oas
i
148 mg/1
Nc
St
N.D
anda
. in
:d.
itre
im
i
| DO
3.2 rag/1
>mg /
1
! . .
Total Coliform
3970/100
iOOO
'100ml
-------
TAiii : i ' - water olaUjY ;,'r;,,r i.'*,. .i liv.oiMi 10:; o; actio:: nEvs
INDIVIDUAL
-------
TABU- IV - WATER QUALITY IM!'ROVLMI..\T THKOUQI COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL ;¦()! KCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES : American Crystal Sugar, Crookston, Minn.
WATER OUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITI.'iS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT l.'ASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
!
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY ! FY
72 ! 73
FY
1 ;->
FY
75
FY
76
1
, (See TABLE II)
F\
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F")
7 C
bod5
Work with Region V to
125.000 ///dav
Det
irmii
lat-i
1 1
1
1
TSS
establish effluent re-
quirements and obtain
commitments.
25,200 ///day
mad
red
1 re
jctic
;ard
>ns.
ing
tieec
ed
DO
j Total Collform
1
1
-------
'I'M'. I ! IV - WA'l'EK QUALM'i I'll'KUVI'MI'.'M 'IIIWIICII t.i Ij 11' I. I-.'I 11.'N Ol'1 Al.TIOi'l I I'l.MS
INDIVIDUAL ;.iH ::CK OR CLUSTER Or" SOtilU.KS : Fargo WWTP
U'VIIR 0UAI.1TY PARAMETERS
ACCRECA'l F.D ACTION ] h :1S
REQUIRED FOR REDUCi'HiM
PRESENT WASTE. LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE IIT)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER
(7-d.iy-lO year flc
(SEE WQS & TABLE I
QUALITY
w)
II)
j
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABI.E T)
FY
72
TY
73
FY
/ A
FY
75
F"i
7£
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
i
i
1 BODq
Improvements under
3500 ///d
2300-
1
1
1 34 nWl
No
¦d
i TSS
4200 ///d
i
?4sn
No data
No
ins
:rear
st
nda
;d
DO
1
1
7 1
Srqg
'1
Total Coliform
27.000/100 Cmeanl
W
1 OOml
*Standard changes during ;
If the flows fall below
gricultural products proce
le average of rhp lnuinr in
ssing season.
£
of all monthly flows of r*
whichever is lower, then i
cord for either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
of April or May,
apply.
1
i
j
i
t
-------
I'Ar.M. iv - water iiiiAi.iii ,ii ,i' mnjHui i (i;iri,[, i'i nrj Of' aci'hjn i n M';
INDIVIDUAL : i nlUCK OR CLUSTER HI' .XI >1 H:CI-S : Union Stockyards, West Fargo
W.MIR QUALITY PARAMETERS
jAGGREGATED ACTION ! 1 I.MS
REQUIRED FOR RFDIK. 1 ION'
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - nvc)
l.'AKTF. LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE Til)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATE
(7-day-10
(SEE UQS &
D WATER
year flc
TABLE I
QUALITY
w)
II)
i
1
1
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE T)
FY
— O
FY
73
FY
/
FY
75
n
if
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
i
| BOD5
Determine effluent
requirements and monitor
782 if/d
Det
mad
red
srmi
b re
jcti
iati
;arc
ma_.
1
on wfi.ll
ing heec
be
ed
!
14.0 me/1
Ho
ins
rear
Stt
/
nrl^
i
1 TSS
5000 ft/d
184 mg/l
No
ins
rear
St;
nria
¦H
i
DO
2.9 mg/l
5mg
1
l
Total Coliform I
965/100
3250/100
5M/
.00ml
*Standard changes during ;
gricultural products proce
ssing season.
of all monthly flows of re
whichever is lower, then t
cord for either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
of April or May,
apply.
-------
TABJ I' Iv' - WATER OUALI'JY 1 Ml'UOVEME^T THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOi ;:CE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: Fargo Water Filtration Plant
l.'\ QUALTTY PARAMETF.RS
.AGGREGATED ACTION J I 1.7IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS | WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(24 hr. - ave) (SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1 (From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY FY
74 75
FY|
76f
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
76
!
1
! BOD 5
Improvements under
construction
34 mo /I
M
1
1
j TSS
40.000 it ID
10M
//P
No data
1
1
DO
2.3
mg/
Total Coliform
27,000/100 (Wan}
M/l
)0ral
^Standard changes during aj
If the flows fall below the
ricultural products proces
average of the lowest 10%
;ing season,
of all
monthly tlow's ol record tor
whichever is lower, then tt
either the months of Apri
e D.O Standard does not ap
L or May,
,ly.
-------
TA11I.! IV - WATER OUALI'n, 1' '.I'lIOVI,.'!!-, l.'T l"I!ROUf ill COMPLCTION OK ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SO! ;CE Oil CLUSTER 01' MHUiCFS : Armour Food - West Fargo
WATER OL'ALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION H • HS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT W\S7E LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE
(SEE Ti
„0ADS REDUCTION
vBLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QIIALI1 •>
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
i
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TAREE I)
FY j FY
72 1 73
FY
7-'.
FY
75
FY
76
. (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
i
bod5
Obtain commitments and
negotiate with company
to encourage a sanitary
5.4 ///d
De
mac
rec
ernn
e re
UCtl
nat
gar
ons
Ion
ling
ill
nee
l
be
ded
14.0 mg/1
Nt
ins
crea
n st
indc
rd
Suspended Solids
sewer hook-up.
2.6 ///d
II
-
1
1"
ii
184 mg/1
Nc
ln£
trea
D St
and;
rd
1
D. 0
II
,,
ii
2.. 9 rag/1
1
jTotal Coliform
19,300/100 ml.
If
11
M
3250/100 ml (mean)
5M/1
OOml
*Standard changes during ag
ricultural products proces
sing season.
If Lhe
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever is lower, then th
flows fall below che avef^j
ord for either the months <
e D.O. Standard does not aj
te or the lowest iuX
)f April or May,
iply.
•
i
-------
TAIil i. IV' - WATER OIJALin IMIWVUIIMT 'IIIKOIICII C< If ll'l .I'.T I ON 01' ACTION IT MIS
INDIVIPIJAL .".ut.KCi: OK CLUSTER or SOURCES: Otter Tail Power Co.. Wahpeton
\"[1K QUALITY PARAMETERS
jACCKI-CATED ACTION i i ! IS
IKLQUIKI-D FOR REDU(.T)
75
1
! , (See TABLE II)
_ FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F\
It
! bod5
Obtain commitment
letter & monitor
progress
833 ///d
Det
mac
rec
ermi
e re
UCtl
nat
gar
ons
^on
ling
ill
nee
!
I be [
ded :
i 5.7 mg/1
Nc
inE
trea
n st
i.
t
' TSS
714 /// d
1
1
i
no data
(1
1 ' '
I DO
-----
5.5 mg/1
3560/100 (mean)
jmg/
1
OOml
j Total Coliform
5M/1
^Standard changes during.ag
ricultural products proces:
;ing season.
If Llit; riuwy fall below ihe
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever ii; lower, then th
average of Lhe luwest 10?=
ord for either the months t
e D.O. Standard does not af
>f April or May, j
ply. 1
1
i
i
-------
TAB',I. IV - HATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOLACE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: Minnkota Power Coop. - Grand Forks
WATER OUALITY PARAMETERS
[AGGREGATED ACTION I'M'IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUC'T rG\:
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE 'I'ABLL III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WOS & TABLE III)
1
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY J FY
72 1 73
FY
7 4
FY
75
ri
H
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7
i
!
i BODc
i J
Develop water quality
effluent standards and
obtain commitments
1500 ///day
Det
mac
rec
ermi
e re
~ cti
lat:
garc
3ns
on
ing
ill
nee
be
led
1
17.0 mg/1
No
in-
;tre
m s
and
ird
TSS
5000 it/day
No data
No
in-
;tre<
m s
and
ird
1
DO
3.2 mg/1
5mg
'1
Total Coliform
Data not available
3970/100 ml
5000
/100ml
^Standard changes during agr
If the flows fall below the
whichever is lower, then thi
.cultural products process!
average of the lowest 10%
ng season.
D.O. Standard does not ap
f-Apni-trt -May,
ply.
1
1
•
i
i
t
-------
TABI r W - WATER QUALILY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETfON OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SO! 'iCE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES: Pillsbury-Grand Forks
.^ATI-R OUAUTY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITI.'IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCE! n.'I
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
<24 hr. - ave)
UASTE
(SEE T/
.OADS REDUCTION
iiSLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TADEE I)
FY | FY
72 1 73
ry fy
7 A| 75
n
it
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
j
! BODr
Develop effluent stds.
and obtain commitments
letter
37 .2/f/dav
Det
mad
red
jrmi
; re
jcti
lati
;ara
ins
on w
ing
ai
iee<
be
ed
17.0 mg /I
Nn
i ns
r par
srt
1
' TDS
9160 ///dav
No data
ft
i
DO
No data
ltl me/I
'i
Total Coliform
No data
1 3970/100ml
5M/
OOml
1
i
i
*Standard changes during agricultural products process
If the flows fall Lelow the [average of the lowes'.: 10%
of all monthlv flows of record for either the months o
ing season.
E April or Mav,
|
whichever is lower, then the D.O. Standard does not ap
jly.
. .
!
i
i
i
-------
TAI'.I I IV - WAT hit QIJA1.1 Ti I •il'KOVMKVr TIHIOUCil COMI'LliTION OF ACTION ITKMS
INDIVIDUAL SO. net; OK CLUSTER 01' MHXCKS : USDI-Baldhill Dam Nat'l Fish Hatchery, Valley City
1 MFR QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION i I !.:IS
REQUIRED FOR REDIK. i' h iM
PRESENT WAS l'E LOADS
(24 hr. - avo)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
~ O
FY
73
TY FY F'i
7 4 75 7(
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7A
FY
75
FY
7
1
1
! bods
Develop effluent standards
and obtain commitment lett
er < 1 ///day
Det
mad
srmi
; re
lat:
>arc
on wjill
inp nppr
be
i
16 mg/1
No
in-
tre.
m s
d.
1
1 TSS
6 ///day
red
acti
3ns
|
!
No Hata
No
in-
itret
m s
d.
1
I DO
5.0 me/I
5mg
'1
I
1
| Total Coliform
No data
4000/100ml
500
)/100ml
1
^Standard changes durina c
aricultural products prnrp
If the flows fall below tt
of all monthly flows of re
whichever io lower, then t
e average of the lowest 10
cord for either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
£
of April or May,
fippl v.
1
1
•
i
i
i
-------
TAI'.l.l. 1/ - WAT ICR QUAL1 IV 1' ll'itOVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETION 01'' ACTTON ITHMS
INDIVIDUAL So' KCE OR CLUSTER OF SOl'lIf;ICS : USDI Nat'l Fish Hatcherv, Valley City
'-.'riiCR OL'ALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I'li.MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - jvo)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS {. TABLE III)
(From TA13LE III)
(See TABLE I)
TY
72
FY
73
FY
1*Y
75
If
, (See TABLE II)
FY
75
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7
I
j BOD5
Develop effluent standard:
and obtain commitment
letter.
-------
TAUI r IV - WATER QUALITY IMPKOVLMEVr TIIKOUCII COMPI.hTION OF ACTION ITliMS
INDIVIDUAL Sw-i!CE OR CLUSTER 01 SOU'lCF,S : Abercombie WWTP
> IT i\ QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I'll MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCi 1 OK
PRESENT 1,'AS'l E LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III) ,
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY'
72
FY
73
FY
FY
75
n
76
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7 (
j
i BODs
Construct secondary
WWTP
133 ///d
119
1
1
nearest downstream
station is at Fargo-data
1
1 TSS
1 Sfi il/rI
.
14 3
1
DO
5mg
'1
Total Coliform
no data
iM/1
300ml
1
i
*Standard changes during ao
'iculturaZ products proces
sins season.
i If the flows fall below the'average of the lowest 10%
of all mont'Oy flows of recird for either the months o
whichever io lower then the D.O. Standard does no app
f April or Mav , !
lv.
•
1
I
-------
tai'.i iy
- WA'I !¦,!( (^IJAI. I I V r.i'l.'OVI-.NI.M' Tl il:U I Kill (.() f 11' 1.1 ¦, I' I (IN 0 I' ACTION I I'i' MS
INDIVIDUAL MK l;CE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES: Amenia
KAii:i( duality parameters
ACCRECATED ACTION Mi 'IS
required FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT ivAS'L'E LOADS
(24 hr. - nvi:)
WASTE
(SEE T/
/.IADS REDUCTION
U1LE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WOS & TABLE III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TAI'jLK I)
TT
~ O
FY
73
FY
/ -
FY
75
F1)
1(
, (See TABLE II)
FY
7 2
No
FY
73
ins
FY
J±
:rea
FY
75
i WQ
FY
_ 76
! bod5
Construct new WWTP.
17 (f/d ay
J !
i
i
1 IIo station on Rush River
j
• TSS
20 ///day
i
i
181 '
No
ins
:rea
1 WQ
;
]
j DO
™p,/
1.
!
Total Coliform
No data
O
O
o
! 100ml
^Standard changes during ag
"icultural products process
ing season.
of all monthly flows of reci
whichever i? lower, then thi
average ul the lowest 10?o
>rd for either the months o
D.O. Standard does not ap
f April or May,
ply.
- -
....
—
....
1
i
I '
(
-------
TAB].): IV - WATER QUALITY I IMPROVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOI -JCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: Wahpeton Wastewater Treatment: Plant
v.A'ITR QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I'll MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS | WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(24 hr. - nve) (SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
j
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY FY
72 1 73
FY'
/ 4
FY
75
F>
It
t
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7
i
BOD5
Construct improvements to
WWTP 2100 #/day
146
;
!
! 5.7
No
in-
itre
m W
IS.
i
! TSS
1
2500 ///day
176C
i
> j
No data
No
in-
;tre
m W
)S.
DO
5.5 rag/1
i. Om
?/i
Total Coliform
No data
3560/100 ml
;ooo
/lOOmL
^Standard changes during ag
"icultural products process
Ing season.
of all monthly flows of rec<
whichever is lower, then th<
>rd for either the months c
D.O. Standard does not af
f April or '•lay,
ply.
- - ¦ - ¦ • t ¦ - • • ¦ -
!
-------
TAIil 1' IV - WATER QUAIJ J i' I Ill'^OVKMK'.'T J1! IUJUC .11 COMI'l.KT LON 01' ACTION IT F.MS
INDIVIDUAL Mil >!CE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCl.S : Grafton, N.D. - Park River - Red River
IOTlK DUALITY PARAMETERS
{AGGREGATED ACTION J i i.'lS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT IMSTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT' WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE TT1)
1
(Trom TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
! A
FY
75
FY
7€
1 , (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7e
BOD5
Improvements currently
under way.
1740 ///day
570
1
| 54 rog/1
Nc
in-
3tre
im h
)S.
TSS
2760 ///day
1
380
j
i
l
| 148 mg/1
Nc
in-
s tre
im W
?s.
1
| DO
No Jata
¦9 mg/1
>mg/
1
Total Coliform
No data
47400/100 ml
5
300/
100ml
^Standard changes during ag
ricultural products proces:
ing season.
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever is lower, then th
ord for either the months t
e D.O. Standard does not ap
f April or May,
ply.
i
I
.
•
-------
TA1SI.1'. W ~ WATKR QUALITY I MI'KOVHMi-AT TllKOUfiff COMI'LKTLON OV ACTION 1TKMS
INDIVIDUAL S(H;KCE OR CLUSTER OF SOUUCLS: Fosston , Minnesota
W.vri K OUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION 1 *1 1 .-IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUC 1 1
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - aue)
l.'ASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE 1IT)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-IO year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLF III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
- n
FY
73
FY! FY
7-',! 75
n
7(
1 , (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
i
j
1 BOD5
Work with Region V to
determine needs.
9,000 ///day
Nee
wil
:ded
1 be
red
de
icti
:erm
ns
ned
1
No data
1
!
! TSS
10,500 ///day
DO
Total Coliform
1
1
1
1
------- |