ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ROCKY MOUNTAIN-PRAIRIE REGION
REGION VIII
CHEYENNE RIVER BASIN
DECEMBER 4, 1972
-------
SECTION A
NARRATIVE
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT SECTION
Narrative A
Basin Load Summary B
Planned Accomplishments C
Point Source Loads ^ Locations D
Ambient Water Quality Status E
Tactical Solution F
Point Source Reductions Required G
-------
CHEYENNE RIVER BASIN ACCOMPLISHMENT PLAN
1. PRIORITY AREA IDENTIFICATION
The Cheyenne River Dasin is roughly wedgelike in shape,
and includes the northeastern corner of Wyoming, the south-
western corner of South Dakota, the northwestern corner of
Nebraska, and the area through central South Dakota to the
Missouri River.
The number of river and shoreline miles covered by the
basin accomplishment plan are roughly estimated and include
the more important river systems with pollution problems.
They are as follows:
Cheyenne River 470+ mi.
Belle Fourche River 380+_ mi.
Uhitewood Creek 40+ mi.
Rapid Creek 70+ mi.
Total 960+ mi.
II. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT
Although the Dasin Plan encompases the entire River Basin,
it focuses in on the major point source problem areas. Potential
problems related to mining, agriculture, and power plant construc-
tion along the upper reaches of the Cheyenne, dictate that this
portion of the Casin be considered in depth in the future. The
present plan focuses on those portions of the Cheyenne River from
the western South Dakota border to its confluence with the Missouri
River on the eastern border along with tributaries having major
point source pollution problems. A total of 710 river miles are
included in the focused area of the plan, 400 miles of which do not
meet water quality standards during some part of the year.
a. Population in the entire Basin amounted to about
140,000 in 1970, over 90 percent of which reside
in the focused portion of the accomplishment plan
area. Major tourist influxes are experienced through
the Black Hills area during summer months and some
growth is occuring in the population centers.
b. In terms of total numbers present, industry and
industrial growth in the area are not problems.
However, there is a major industrial mining source
causing several hundred miles of stream to fall
below ambient water Quality standards. In addition,
there is a potential radiation problem posed by a
milling activity.
-------
Page 2 - Cheyenne River Basin Accomplishment Plan
c. Approximately 400 miles of the 700 miles of
river system under detailed consideration in
the plan are not meeting present or proposed
stream standards. Whitewood Creek, the Belle
Fourche River and the Cheyenne River are grossly
polluted by mine tailings and process wastes
from the Homestake Mining Company and municipal
wastes from the communities of Lead and Deadwood.
Fecal coliform and total suspended solids criteria
are oftem exceeded.
Nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment of Clack Hills
lakes and streams interferes with fish and wild-
life propagation, reduces aesthetic values, affects
domestic uses, and reduces recreational benefits.
The source of these nutrients are municipal waste
waters, domestic wastes from rural residential
developments, livestock wastes, agricultural fertili-
zers, and natural decomposition of organic materials.
Natural contributions outweigh man-caused contribu-
tions. The nutrient problem will be quantified and
solutions identified by the comprehensive water
quality management plan being developed by the Black
Hills Conservancy Sub-District through a grant
authorized under Section 3(c), PL 84-660 as amended.
Bacterial pollution occurs in the basin from livestock,
recreation activities, and from domestic wastes. Many
chemical pollutants occur naturally in the soils;
however, mining operations account for some.
d. Both South Dakota and Wyoming have approved Water
Quality Standards. These standards include water
quality criteria and plan of implementation. The
Standards need to be updated continuously to keep
current with changing technology and changing water
uses. Numerical criteria will have to be adopted
for certain parameters now covered by general criteria.
Whitewood Creek, from the Belle Fourche River to
headwaters, changes its classification from Class "B"
to Class "A" on December 31, 1973. A Class "B" stream
is one with no beneficial use assigned whereas a
Class "A" stream has an assigned beneficial use.
There are no classification changes expected in FY 1973.
-------
Page 3 - Cheyenne Kiver Basin Accomplishment Plan
e. Several of the necessary new or expanded municipal
treatment facilities are already under construction
or grant offers have been made. The major municipal/
industrial problem is the Homestake Mining Company
discharges and the Lead-Deadwood municipal wastes.
This problem along with seepage from uranium and
vanadium waste storage ponds of Mines Development Inc.,
and uranium tailings piles were subjects of a western
South Dakota Enforcement Conference in 1971. The
problem is still being assessed and recommendations
developed for the tailings and seepage problems.
However, the Homestake Mining Company and Lead and
Deadwood were put on an implementation schedule.
An environmental impact statement has been filed on
this project. At present the project is well behind
the established implementation schedule but this plan
should insure completion at the earliest possible
date, which is the first quarter of 1975.
f. Although many of the necessary new or expanded waste
treatment facilities are under construction or have
grant offers, there is an important need to continue
working with these groups to assure that construction
is completed as expeditiously as possible and that
the plant operation conforms to design standards.
g. During the night of June 9-10, 1972, disastrous floods
caused extensive damage and loss of life in Rapid City.
Lesser impacts occurred over a four county area within
the Cheyenne River Basin. The Mountain-Plains Federal
Regional Council was assigned the responsibility for
coordinating intermediate and long-term recovery efforts
of Federal agencies. As part of an overall State/Federal
management team, a Federal task force was given the
primary responsibility of coordinating Federal inputs
and working with state and local representatives. EPA,
as a member of both the council and the task force, is
involved in the area's recovery effort.
III. AGENCY AND/OR OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES
1. The water quality of the Cheyenne River Basin is to
meet existing and proposed standards by FY 1975.
-------
Page 4 - Cheyenne River Basin Accomplishment Plan
2. Immediate and visible reductions in pollution from
specific municipalities and industries polluting isolated but
substantial reaches of stream are estimated to be as follows:
BODc
TSS
FY
(1b/da)
(1b/da)
1973
448
317
1974
506
6,569
IV. APPROACH
The objectives outlined above will be achieved through the
following program elements and their listed activities:
1. Municipal Waste Treatment Construction Grants (AB 1164)-
assist in the financing and construction of nine new waste water
treatment plant improvements which will increase plant efficiency
and solve some of the water quality problems.
2. Refuse Act Permits (3B2124) - obtain letters of commit-
ments to reduce pollution loadings from several industries.
3. Operation and Maintenance (2B8163) - to ensure that
operation and maintenance practices are maximized.
4. Water Quality Planning (2B3149) - monitor 3(c) Grant,
assist in the upgrading of ambient and effluent standards, and
provide guidance in the effective management of the water resource
to maintain or improve water quality. Participate in flood recovery
program.
5. Water Quality Monitoring and Water Pollution Source
Surveillance (2B2147) and (3B1123) - carry out recommendations of
Enforcement Conference and assess impact of actions.
6. Manpower Training (2B7160) - to ensure that waste water
treatment plant operators are properly trained and stay current with
advancing technology.
7. Public Affairs (5T2215) - to carry out an aggressive Dublic
information program concerning pollution in the area.
8. Environmental Impact Statements Review (2B6117) - Review
environmental statements of construction grants projects and 3(c)
grant.
-------
INFORMATION SOURCES USED IN OBTAINING BASIN WASTE DISCHARGE AND
WATER QUALITY DATA FOR SOUTH PLATTE BASIN
RAPP Permit Applications
STORET Water Quality Data, including data from
a. USGS-EPA
b. State of South Dakota
c. Black Hills Conservancy Sub-District
d. Municipal Inventory
EPA DFIDC, Region VII, and Region VIII Report, "Pollution Affecting
Water Quality of the Cheyenne River System, Western South Dakota,
September 1971."
EPA, Region VIII Report, "Evaluation of the Impact of the Mines
Development, Inc. Mill on Water Quality Conditions in the Cheyenne
River, September 1971."
USPHS Report, "Summary Report on Quality of Interstate Waters Cheyenne
River, Including Beaver Creek, Wyoming-South Dakota, June 1962."
Black Hills Conservancy Sub-District Report, "Comprehensive Water
Quality Management Plan for the Black Hills Region, Plan of Study,
January 1971."
South Dakota Committee on Water Pollution, "Interim Basin Plan for
Central Missouri River Basin, South Dakota, January 28, 1972."
USGS-Compilation of Records of Surface Waters of the United States.
-------
SECTION B
BASIN LOAD SUMMARY
-------
PRIORITY BASIN WORK SHEET
Date
Name of Basin CHEYENNE RIVER
1. Area covered:
Headwaters to Lake Oahe
2. llfater quality objectives:
(a) (b) EPA Objective: (c)
Current Minimum Acceptable Actual Level at Accuracy
criteria Ambient Level Worst Time of Yr. [% +)
(see WQS) (See Table 4) (See Table 2) [Regional est.)
mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 + %
No standard except for intermittent streams"which is 30 mg/1.
90 90 6,500 10
S I URL I Minor Basin
ID No.
Regi on VI I I
State(s) South Dakota £•
Wyomi ng
Parameter
bod5
TSS
3. Estimated pollution 1oad—a 11 sources (average FY 72):
Load Accuracy {% ±)
(See Table 4)
pounds/day + %
BOD5 3,210 10
TSS 5,480,260 10
Estimated pollution load reduction required to meet EPA water quality
objectives derived from 2(c) - 2(b):
Required Reduction
( $. of Table 4)
pounds/day
Accuracy (% +)
bod5
TSS
+ %
594 10
5,477,529 10
Reduction firmly committed by FY 72 and prior year actions:
Year of Actual Reduction
BOD5
TSS
FY 73
1bs/day
448
317
FY 74
lbs/day
478
348
FY 75
lbs/day
510
381
FY 76
1bs/day
794
5,471,2$5
Additional reductions to be obtained by FY 73 and FY 74 commitments:
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
(See Table 4)
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
BOD5
0
28
109
109
JS_S_
0
6t221
_6_a6g
6j 360
-------
T «/"> '/^A *< <• A r i n 1 1 i i i r> v-i ^AUtio^AA >».._•. ^ « J .
iii^i lit p^i iuiiuii ui ^tfiai yci c Ape u tcu .
Year of Actual Increase
BOD(
TSS
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
2k
79
88
121
26
58
92
127
Total reductions to be obtained--sum of 5 and 6 above:
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY_74
FY_ 75
F_Y_7_6
1bs/day
1bs/day
1bs/day
1bs/day
bod5
448
506
'¦ 1 .f'
903
TSS
317
6,569
5,477
.645
9. Total reductions required-
-sum of 4 and 7 above:"
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
bod5
618
673
682
715
TSS
^i77, f>>k77>S87f>k77>62
5,477
,656
10. Year in which minimum acceptable water quality levels are to be achieved--
compare 8 and 9 above:
FY i
1 07
11. If figures for items 2 through 7 above are not available, please provide
estimate of when they will become available through monitoring and other
activities:
Are items 3, 5, and 6 above derived from detailed discharger inventories?
Yes
12. Key pollutants, if any, for which a weight or other quantity measure is
not appropriate:
(Note-special .problems and comments) other significant pollutants that
will be abated are toxic metals. Nutrients are also a problem in
the basin. The major nutrient load comes from
natural sources. The 3(c) grant will determine if it may be
necessary in the future to minimize the nutrient loads from
municipal facilities.
-------
SECTION C
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
-------
PLANNED ACCOMP* "RMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a ~r~] Sub-Elenent
b.f JPart. Sub-Eleni.
r. J I On. A r>»rt
2. Progran Sub-Elenent Title Water Quality Plannin
5. Geographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
')•-T— iTT" "Sir> J li ^Til'i^laTT^raTlW
3. Sub-Elecent No.
. 2B3T49
4.Sheet No.
6. Geo. Area Code
7.Priority
;3. Code
*• !
9. No
lO.SchcdDate
of Com.
1? . PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
73
74
t\\^
1
4/1/7 3
Review Nisi and WWTP application
0- 5
KS>v
2
4/1/73
Review Keystone WWTP application
0 ._£
!^\>
3
6/15/73
Review Hot Springs WWTP application
0.5
4
10/1/73
Monitor BHCSD 3(c) Planning Grant
1 .1;
0.5
3 \ \ \
5/15/74
Review Sturgis.WWTP application
0.4
xN
ndefinite Coordinate Flood Response
12/1/73
Assist in the development of effluent criteria for
industrial dischargers
8
continuing Monitoring Cheyenne River Basin Accomplishment Plan
fcY
V
S\
\
LV
t\\\ \
f 12.
FY 197 3
ip• 6.6 h3•
13. FY 1974
a. 3.0
b.
_U-2.
1 .0
c.S
0.8 0.6
laSL
ed by & Date
15. Reviewed by f. Date
16 . Approved forRPT0__
L. . . -
Planned A :.cotnplishn:cats
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL CEMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a i 1Sub-Eienent
b.( )?art. Sub-Elea.
r-.l Am a
J3 .Code
\
\
\
Kx
lO^chcdDate
3.K°4of Corp.
1 .
12/1/72
V1 / 7 3
•actts*i,T.[gr*u»t^rcr »*>*--¦,• «;
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Title water Quality Standarc
3. Sub-Elecent No,
s . 2B11 m-3
4.Sheet No.
5. Geographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
lL • ' PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
6. Geo. Area Code
7.Priority
73
Assist in evaluating water quality standards for streams for
the BHCSD 3(c) Grant
Assist in developing effluent criteria for the following
industrial dischargers:
Spearfish National; Fish Hatchery
Q.*t
0.2
lb
SUl
i\
\
k.
b^xi-z.
\
L\
\
LVX
8.
Vl/73
Bi rdsa 11 Sand & Gravel
Vl/73
Dakota Black Co.
Vl/73
Pete Lien & Sons, Inc
9/1/73
Ellsworth Air Force Base
9/1/73
Air Products £- Chemicals
12/1/73
Ki esli ng Oi1 Co.
0.2
0J2
0. |2
o- 2
0. 2
0. 2
f 12. FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & D/ite
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved rorRPIO. f,
b.'
ir^no—aw: '-¦tuti-'
«• 1 .0
b.
rrup" wh
¦.¦.rje. 'u¦-"".¦t.".. ,.ux j x- - rfnr;^
t:. j
-------
PLANNED ACCOM?L MENTS SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a / i Sub-Elenent
b.( Jpart. Sub-Elca,
.C..L- ,1G P-Q ^Ar.aa.
;3.Code
\
X
\
9, Ko.
10
— - wmnii'ip*
¦cd by & Date
15. Reviewed by 6 Date
16 . Approved forKPTO '
rr.r ji i lt ¦'jc • r .
. .... J
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMP* ^SHMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a /) Sub-Elenent
b.f J Part. Sub-Elea.
r.l J On. Ar r*n
3.Code
v\
9. No.
\
\
1 0
} 1
lO^chcdDate
of Corp.
10/31/72
11/15/72
12/1/72
1/1/73
1/15/73
1/15/73
3/1/73
3/15/73
8/15/73
9/1/73
9/30/73
10/1/73
1/15/7^
•12.
FY 19V3
b.
« ~ , Construction Grant
2. Prpgraa Sub-Elenent Title Qperati ons
5. Geographical Area Title
3. Sub-Element No.
2B8162
A.Sheet No.
6. Geo. Area Code
7.Priority
lLu
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
73
Complete construction of Hill City WWTP
0.2
Complete construct,!'on of-Spearfish WWTP
0.2
Work out agreement with BuRec to serve as a consultant on
the structural design of the .tai1ings- pond for Lead-Deadwood 0.2
Contact keystone tfnru state about possible constr. grant
0.1
Go thru state to get Nisi and to apply for grant
0. 1
Pre-application hearing for Hot Springs construction grant
0.05
Pre-application hearing for Keystone
0.1
Application for a yrant from Hot Springs
0.05
Complete plans and. specifications for the Lead-Deadwood WWTP
Begin construction of the Keystone WWTP
Approve plans for the Lead-Deadwood WWTP
Complete construction of Custer WWTP
0.4
Contact the state on Sturgis applying for a grant-for
interceptor sewer
7k
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.2
0. 10
13.
FY 1974
miwTwr
14. Prepr.rod by & Date
pwr.wn. in. ..»crr
15. Reviewed by & Dnte
Planned Accomplishments
.—, i _ Wl 11 »- a*. I ¦ .r
16.Approved forRP ;_oJ
j
-------
7LANHED ACCOMPLISHMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Ty£® Plan
n /' i Sub-EIenent
b.f J?art. Sub-Elen,
r.l lfipn. kmn
?3 .Code
9.Ko.
4
1 5
1 6
17
tss
18
lO^chcdDate
of Costp.
2/15/74
3-15-74
6/1/74
9/1/74
10/1/74
2. Progran Sub-EIenent Title
5. Ccographical Area Title
3. &ub-Eleaent No.
6. Geo. Area Code
JLL
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Pre-app1i cation conference-Sturgis
Application review, and process grant - Sturgis
Begin construct!'on' of Sturgi s interceptor
Complete construction of Keystone WWT-P
Complete constructs on of Nisi and WWTP
A,Sheet No.
7.Priority
73
0.4
74
0.1
0.1
0.1
3.2
0.4
19
20
21
10/1/74
Complete construction of Hot Springs WWTP
9/1/74
Complete construction of Keystone WWTP
12/1/74
Complete construction of Sturgis interceptor
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
22
11/1/75
Complete construction of Lead-Deadwood WWTP
1.5
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL TMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a / i Sub-Elcaent
b.f ]?art. Sub-Elca.
r..l Iflpn. Arc,-:
;3 .Code
[lOSchedDate
'.Ko J0
Comp,
Construction Grants
2. Program Sub-Elcneat Title Administration
3. ^ub-Eleaent No.
288316
4.Sheet Ko.
5. Geographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
II, PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
6. Geo. Area Code
Process construction grants for the following facilities:
£j
7.Priority J
73
74
\
V
0/31/72
Hi 11 Ci ty WWTP
11/15/72
Spearfi sh WWTP
10/1/73
Custer WWTP
0.1
Q. 1
0.1 0.1
i\\vi
k
9/1/74
Keystone WWTP
0.1
0.2
K
K
8
AJ
\
\
10/1/74
Ni si and WWTP
10/1/74
Hot Springs WWTP
12/1/74
Sturgis Interceptor
11/1/75
Lead-Dfeadwood WWTP
0.3 0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
> \ N N
[ 12. FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Dnte
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIoJ
i
j. 0.90
. a -j*.' zr t. 'ja r. r.x
b."
a. 0.90 lb.
I 1 I- "I»S mfWfm^rrl ¦» ^ 1 UMKl
1
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a -'I Sub-EIcnent
:S
b.f JPart. Sub-Elea.
c.riflen.. -Ar.e/i
cww>:c«ncn3ncco^3:3
„ ^ Operation and
2* Progran Sub-Elcoeut Tide Maintenance
5. Ccographlcal Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
1 «; i'i"1
3. $ub~Eleaent No.
2B8163
4.Sheet No.
6. Geo. Area Code
7.Priority
J.Code
\
9. No.
\
rv\
\
lO^chcdDate
of Co~p.
11
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
10/31/72
Prepare O&M manuals for the following facilities and OS-M inspections.
Hi 1 1 Ci ty WWTP 0.2
10/1./73
Custer WWTP
0 0 2'
Vl 5/74
Spearfi sh WWTP
0.2
9/1/74
Mt. Rushmore-Keystone WWTP
0.1
10/1/74
Lejid-Deadwobd WWTP
id/'/fo
Hot Springs WWTP
0.1
10/1/74
Ni slanrUVNTP
0 o 2
3onti nui'ng
Sturgi s WWTP
onti nui ng
Rapid City WWTP
0.1
^onti nui ng
Develop State )&M programs anC-review plant staffing' plans,
6,4-
IWWI
12. FY 1973
0.
0.1
0.2
0.2
0<
0.1
0.1
0.1
C.o
J
¦s
1.5
13. FY 1974
b.
a. 1.1?
mAtmnTiMiiTnnti;
14. Prepared by & Date
b.
15. Reviewed by & Date
•i •„ • i. r.nncra-VA'je.'rryo rrnrrrsrtfVw
rrTrrrcrw.
16 . Annrnved forrvPiuJ
i
Planned Ac.complishaents
-------
PLANNED ACC0MP7 "HMENTS" SCHEDULE
.L, TVpe of Plan
a .CO Sub-Eieaent
b.f JPart. Sub-Elea.
r.l ICpd. Ar",i
?3Cede
\
9. No.
&
k\:
\
i\\\A
105thcdDate
of Corp.
6-73
12.
FY 1973
0
b.'
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Title Water Supply
5. Ccographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin Pr
KUl'U.ri ¦> li.'fTW'U.
3. Sub-Elecaent No. A.Sheet No.
2C5226
6. Geo. Area Code
Dgram
7.Priority
JUL
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHXENTS
Conduct inventory of all public water supplies including information
concerning population served, treatment, production, and capacity
13.
FY 1974
14. Prepi i'cd by & Pete
15. Rcvleved by & Date
Planned /.:.cotnplishccnts
. ../..iiji'j1 v.
"J
16.Approved forKPIO i,
i
-------
PLANNED ACCOM?* ^SHMENTS- SCHEDULE
-------
PLANNED ACCOM' 5HMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
Sub-Elenent
b.f JPart. Sub-Elea.
£.1 ir>e.a
?3. Code
\
\
|105chcdDate
I N'o J,
I v \ \ \
N
of Cor-p,
4-1-73
6/15/73
10/1/73
6/1/74
»? r mjtKiiu3rcxacassKr.\iimmr.,.mmtuL^M^rvcj:jkm^r*'
Environmental Impact
2. Progran Sub-Elenent Title Statement Review/Water . 2Bbll7
5. CcoSraphlcal Area Title Cheyenne River Basi
n
3. ^ub-Eleaent No.
6. Geo. Area Code
11
FLANNEQ ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Complete EIS for Nisi and WWTP
Complete EIS for Hot Springs WWTP
Complete EIS for BHCSD 3(c) Grant
Complete EIS for Sturgis WWTP
4.Sheet No.
7 .Priority
22 Zit
1 .8
1 .8
2..0
.8
\\\
iX.
S\WN
\
i \\\ \
111
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
L
5.6
b.
a- 1 .8
b.
14. Prcpr.red by & Pete
.J
15. Revieved by & Date
"1
16.Approved forRPIO
I
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS' SCHEDULE
1. Ty£e of Plan
a / 1Sub-EIcnent
b.f JPart. Sub-Elea,
C- ¦' .UTpn. Arr,i
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Title Refuse Act Permi ts
5. Ccographlcal Area Title Cheyenne. Ri ver Basin
3. $ub-
nt No.
4.Sheet No.
6. Ceo. Area Code
7.Priority
;3 .Code
\
9. No.
\
IS
105chcdDate
qL Corp.
JJL_
FLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
73
74
10/31/72
S.D. Cement Plant-recommend connection to Rapid City Sewer 0.4
1/1/73
S.D. Cement Plant - Letter of commitment
0.5
1/1/73
Mines Development Inc. - seal storage for liquid uranium and vanadium.
mi 11 wastes.
0.6
0.6
W73
Pete Lien - Develop effluent criteria
0.5
:\-A
k:
K\\
\1
bo
\\ \ \
V/73
Spearfigh National Fish Hatchery-develop effluent criteria 0o5
VI/73
81rdsal1-develop effluent criteria
0.
4/1/73
Dakota B1ock-develdp .eff1uent criteria
0.5
6/1/73
S. Dakdta Cedent Plant - connection to Rapid City sewer
6/1/73
Spearfish NF'H - letter of corrrni tment
0.3
0.3
6/1/73
Birdsal1 - letter of commitment
0.3
6/1/73
Dakota Block - letter of commitment
0.3
6/1/73
Pete Lien - Letter of commitment
0.3
9/1/73
Ellsworth AFB - develop effluent criteria
0.4
0.3
9/1/73
Air. Products & Chemicals - develop effluent criteria.
0.4
0.2
12.
FY 1973
L
13.
FY 1974
b.
OUAtA«
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL .MENTS- SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
a / i Sub-Eleoenc
b. CD Part. Sub-Elea.
f -I lOn. Arm
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Title
Refuse Act Permi ts
(conti nued)
'3. Code
lO^chcdDate
ol-Conp.
5. Ccogrophlcal Area Title chf,vennR Rivfir Basin
3. Sub-Eleoent No.
¦3 B 21 2k
6. Ceo. Area Code
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Kiesling Oil - develop effluent criteria
Air Products '£¦ Chemicals- - letter of commitment
£11sworth-AFB - Letter of commitment
Ki esl i ng Oil. Co. - letter of commitment
Spearfish NhH - monitor
Bi rdsa.l 1 -'monitor
Dakota Block - monitor
Pete Lien - monitor
Ki esling Of 1 - moni tor
Air Products £- Chemicals - monitor
Ellsworth AFB - moni'tor
Mrnes Development, Into - monitor
U.Sheet No.
FY 1974
a- 6.0 b.
nojiuja mmnrHor
14. Prepa red by & Pete
0.2
15. Reviewed by & Date
Of* uijinfiwp i g'r>aiwragir.'.in;,,
-------
PLANNED ACCOM' 5HMENTS SCHEDULE
1. Type of Plan
q .CZD Sub-Elenent
b. CD Part. Sub-Elea.
-C.L .
£3 .Code
\
9. No.
t-Viit wttear
* „ „ , , Water Quality
2. Progran Sub-Element Title Mor|i corjnq
5. Ceographlcol Area Title Chevenne River Basin
C\
-v-
\!
\
t\\ \ \
u£
lO^chedDate
of
10/31/72
10/1/73
Vl 5/7^
9/1/7^
10/1/74
10/1/74
12-1-75
3'2|U2Wcent N°*
A.Sheet Hc>.
6. Geo. Area Code
7. Pr
11
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Establish wate.r quality monitoring stations & monitor the following
completed municipal facilities
Hi
Ci ty WWTP
Custer WWTP
Spearfish WWTP
Keystone-Mt. Rushmore WWTP
Hot Springs WWTP
Nisi and WWTP
Lead-Deadwood WWTP
FY 1973
0.25
b.'
73
05
icri.y j
74
0.2 0.
.05
.05
.01
0
J
13.
FY 1974
a.
¦o.2:
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Rcvteved by & Date |l6. Approved forR-Pr0_J
J
Planned A: compllshrcer.ts
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPl""RMENTS' SCHEDULE
,L. Type of Plan
n .(ZD Sub-Eienent
bI )Part. Sub-Elca.
c.! Iflpn. Arcn
;3 ..Code
\
\
2. Program Sub-Elcnent Title Manpower Training
9. No.
vx
vT
\\--\T
b:
\
i.\
S4
bvX
10j5chcdDate
of Corp.
conti nu.
conti nu,
conti nu.
conti nu.
conti nu.
12.
FY 197 3
j.
5. Geographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
3 • 5 ub—
nt No.
6. Geo. Area Code
11
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Support WWTP operator training programs
In-house manpower planning for WWTP
Develop manpower planning function
Work with Wyoming 'on development of certification prograrti
Coordinate field s;tudy training program for WWTP Operators
A.Sheet No.
7.Priority
1-2
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
13.
FY 1974
a. j r b.
rL'WjtUH'jal'-ftat uriirncrr
14. Prcpt.fcd by & Date
i tp" 'iiiUiiiHtrtffcmCJ i v i m'li
15. Reviewed by & Date
.r:. Iiy3uc=rg4-jc-m.-i' ^ 1 - —*- '
Planned Accomplishments
"I
16 . Approved forRPIO f.
, J
-------
PLANNED ACCOMP >HMENTS' SCHEDULE
I. Type of Plan
a /"I Sub-Eienent
b.f"]?art. Sub-Eleai.
c.l J.Ten. Ar^,i
;3 .Code
\
9.K0
\
?v
!\
h \
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Title Public Affairs
105chcdDate
of Corp.
10/1/73
conti nu
conti nu.
conti nu,
5. Geographical Area Title Cheyenne River Basin
3. $ub-^^cjQpt No.
6. Geo. Area Code
11
rLANN'ED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Assist BHCSD develop slide program for 3(c) Grant
Coordinate public information with state & private agencies
Utilize film documentaries and television to carry message oh'
water pol1ution
Publish articles in appropriate publications
A.Sheet No
• ¦- ^
Planned A:.compIishrccnts
-------
PRIORITY BASIM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: SEMI-Ai.'EUAL PREPARATIONS MILESTONES REPORT DATE SUBMITTED:
EFP.1P.3 VIM HALF, 19 2L BASIN: Cheyenne
— PREPARED BY: J. Tucker Water Resources Planner tfi 30B37-Li-C'k
an (Name) (Title)
cc
£ APPROVED BY:
(Name) (Title) (Initials)
MILESTONES
DATE f.-ILESTdNE
atta:;;:d or to be
ATTAINED
LIST ANY MISSING Oft INADEQUATE PREPARATIONS AND INDICATE
FCH EACH PERIOD Ifl CURRENT STATUS. DISCUSS THOSE NEEDING
HEADQUARTERS ATTENTION, INCLUDING REASONS, CORfcCTIVE
MEASURES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRESS. USE
SUPPLEMENTARY SHEETS AS NECESSARY.
CRITICAL IYQ DATA O-TAIf.TD
No
1/1/73
Will be supplied by BHCSD 3(c) Grant.
CRITICAL EFFLUENT DATA OGTAIKED No
1/1/74
Data supplied is by the industry. Need to co
more EPA effluent data collection.
KECE$SARY MOOELiriS COMPLETED NyA
ICCFR/FiilLY KVELGPIB FLAKS F02 AJiEA
ArFr.ii'.cD a::d co r.EVisicus weeded no
10/1/73
BHCSD 3(c) wiM meec requirements of fuM-'
developed plans.
STATE Pn:cr;IT£ES FOSi 1 I 5 YEAR J.EEDS
co;:ror,:.:cO v/mi Accc:.:rL!s:::;r:u plam Yes
»
EI7Ll'E!;T GUIDELINES FOR CRITICAL SOURCES
AV:';i/.r-LE Yes
v:a c.-iiiEriA CQVzni::G all c:iit;c;.l pr.r.AUETEf.s
in AriA A?rr.:vtD a;:d t;o revisions deeded no
1/1/73
BHCSD (3c) Grant will review criteria ano mak-u
recommendations if necessary.
usEDEsi:-:-:ATi3;:s a::d i:o::de«:iadatio!i
sute;:cj;ts for a:,ea v/Auas
AFPnG'vTD TiliD r.'O REVISIONS HEEDED No
ii ii i ¦¦
1/1/73
1 1
BHCSD (3c) Grant may recommend?upqrading o~
some streams. State has designated Whit=wood
Creek to chanqe use designation by 12/3V73.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES COVERING THE AREA'S
DISCHARGERS APPROVED AMD CONF08MED WITH
ACCOMPLISHMENT PLAN Yes
The pri mary -di schargers which .are' iocateo 3:cn:.
Whitewood Creek, are under implementation
schedu1es.and plan conforms. p ^
-------
SECTION D
POINT SOURCE LOADS AND LOCATIONS
-------
PRIORITY RANKING OF DISCHARGES IN CHEYENNE BASIN
Top Ten Grouping: Not in of priority within group
(1) Lead-Deadwood Sanitary District, S.D.
(2) Hi 11 Ci ty, S.D.
(3) Rapid City, S.D. JJ
(4) Ellsworth AFB: S.D. (Municipal) 1/
(5) Custer, S.D.
(6) Mines Development, Inc., Edgemont, S.D.
(7) South Dakota Cement Plant, Rapid City, S.D.
(8) upton, wy.
Fai th, S.D.
Hermosa, S.D.
Bel 1e Fourche, S.D.
Spearfish, S.D.
Hot Springs, S.D.
Sturgi s, S.D.
Nisi and, S.D.
Whitewood, S.D.
Newel 1, S.D.
(9) Ellsworth AFB^S.D. (industrial)
(10) USDI Spearfish National Fish Hatchery, S.D
\J Not a problem as such. Present facilities are adequate to take
care of needs beyond FY 76. Ranked high on priority list
because total treated wastes discharged is large relative to
other point sources in the basin.
2j Not a direct discharge - seepage impacts water quality - Also,
wind and water transport of uranium sand tailings into the
Cottonwood Creek - Cheyenne River system.
-------
ft
\r
3
3
oc
IV
t-
3
u
4
FRfeAfCH ctr.
(V
H
3
3
ex.
0
fr-
O
a:
FALLR.
Rm iqff
4;
\
RM V&fc
O.
h
3
3
z
o
H
a
5
4-
a
I *
3 J
» "J
* €
«/» A
u>
_i
h
«/>
Z
AMfcOSTUQR K«S.
<*- Devsuopjw^r co.
A EOG€f*OrtT
-o
06 Ave R etc.
KM nr
A A
r
«
a
flf
»-
(A
5
o
^Riw SoS *OU™ 0RHOT!>
STATE LlrtC
I
CHEYeNAte l<. WV0IVMN6
/MEAK SfcfcNCe*
A/OT5 I WOT Td SCdit
-------
*6
«r a
LL 3
o*h« pes.
X
u
«
U>
>
a
to
oo
CHgfiQVCtcA cHffy&NrtfR. 9 CH6RRN CK.
BCllE" ,-Fougcttc — see 3(fl)
A
feoxeupcc dr.
RAPID ck.
a.
*-
3
»/»
o
S
ce
ai
X
RVW liu
U)ASTA
R«H #S\
A
£
«
V-
0
*
o
_>
V-
iVt
—1>
3 ATT U 6 CIC.
/MOTS ; MoT TO SCftWB
-------
CHEYEUNE
STREAM
F'L&w/
Rive k.
Be U£~
poo'RC.HG'J
Lec;&N D
U)
at
8U7T£
*K
£Ci<
WHlTiHOOP
~*
r
to
G
t*
3
V-
V)
c*£e^
U-
NtCLanD WtfTf ft
*
fci
I
K
ft:
WJ
a.
i.
o,
5 ^
« *
S $
, ^
gl
Uj <-
^ •»
SPE*RV\;h 0*E£k.
-Be LLC ToUKtwe WV/TP
g^Tf
b *0
ijK k:
A
SOUTH DAKOTA
WVO MINdr
A SAMPUriG SThJiens m\ i{
class t Ft c fin oh
tioiC 'Not To SzALG
-------
PRIORIT ASIN ACCOMPLISHMENTS: ANNUAL WQ ACCOMPLISHMENT ~PORT
REGION VIII CALENDAR YEAR IS 1972 DATE SUBMITTED
PREPARED BY J. W. Tucker, Jr. Water Resources Planner TEL 303-837-4963
APPROVED BY
(Name) (Ti tie) (Initials)
AREA
POPULATION
(Based on 1970
Census)
River Miles or Area
Equivalent for Lakes,
Estuaries, Etc.
Meets Standards
(Miles and/or
Area)
Not at Standards
(Miles and/or
Area)
Basin Totals (Mi
Basin Miles
les and/or Area)
Area In Total
Total s
All Priority Basins
in Region
Basin
Basin Cheyenne River
140,000 +
830 +
400 +
980 +
Basin
Basin
i
I
1J Includes only major streams and streams that have a point discharge. Page_J—of—1
-------
SECTION E
AMBIENT WATER QUALITY STATUS
-------
TABLE II - A.M3IENT WATER QUALITY AT AREST DOWNSTREAM MOKnORIKS" STATION
Cheyenne River Basin
Data ) Minimum
. Listi ng) Maximum
Mean
IiA3IC - ::0/- APPLICABLE
KLO W
PH
,TEXP
°F
DO
TDS
TS.3
ORG-N
TOTAL
P
(FECAL)
(TOTAL)
GREASE
£c OIL
TOXIC
K^TALS
ot;:er
TOXICS
5-d^ BOD
EA3 2
FLO'!?
-
V :\?Z1 SOUFCS ;:o P.V. 1/
- .Tr:CC K)i:rr (headwaters)
1
J
i
Cheyenne River at
Edgemont, S. Dakota
Cob'
0.31
609
65
4,2
8.4
7.7
no value
25
10.5
0.2
11.8
8.6
1100
7100
3890
no data
0.0^
2.4)NH3"N
0.4).
0.00)
0.0
5.8
0.5
0
5100)Tot
1160)197
1 )
\
3 measure-
)-lments
none detec
0.1)Hg
0.3)Tot
0.2)mg/
ted
Numerous
parameters
Isee print-
out
! 0.5
i 9.4
2.9
2!o)NHg-N
0.4)
- 210)feca
\.65)col i
|
Cheyenne'River at Wasta
only major trib. between
Chis point & confluence
-no data
6.8
8.2
7.7
36 oF
16 oF
54 oF
6.7
12.2
8.6
20
1935
1390
40
6480 ;
, 1810 /
0.0)
1.0)N0i-N
0.4) ~
0.1-Sol. /
0.6 P04 /
0.4 PO4
220 )tot
18300)1967
11600)
no data
1
fluoride
1 ron
manganese
none
no data
is Elk Creek
\
0 )
1920)fecal
610 )co.lj/
1
Cheyenne River at Cherry
Creek 20-30 miles from
Cheyenne Arm of Oalne Res
'
New S
tati on.
Went int
o operat
ion July
1, 1972.
No Data
avai1ab1
e at thi:
t i me.
V
JJ Detailed river mil
ages wi
1 1 be a
vai1able
7/1/73
-------
TABLE II - AKBIEKT WATER QUALITY AT ."BAREST DOWKSTEEAX MONITORING' STATION
Data ) Listing - Minimum Cheyenne River Basin
Listing) Maximum
Mean
BA=IC PARA^TERS - i-'.G/L UiiS:!E APPLICABLE
FLOW
cf s
PH
.TEMP
°F
DO
TDS
T£3
TOTAL
p
(FECAL)
(total)
p ^ p T>
GREASE
& OIL
TOXIC
K2TALS
^ ot;;er
TOX ICS
5 Day
BOD
'..r.CL PC INT (hecdvatei"s)
Rapid Creek below Pactol
upstream from Rapid City
a 0 Oct 7.2
>170 Mai 8.6
it4.it 8.1
34
61
50
8.7
12.2
10.2
202
260
227
5
41
10
0 .00)NOo
0-33)as
0.07 ) fvj
No
Data
0)Fecal
r 1 ¦
])Col1.
0 )
No
Data
No data
No data
1 . 2
7.0
3.5
22)Feca1
6 )Strep
/-
Rapid Creek near Farming
dale - downstream from
Rapid City /about 20 mi 1 e
- o •
264C
7.6
8.8
8.0
34
82
63
6.4
18.7
10.8
370
935
676
10 '
773 '
1 36 y
0.45)N03
2-1 ) as
1 .2 )n
3.1)Sol.
1 ,2)P0if ;
3.6)Total
900 ) Tc
1 2, 200)C<
6,200 )MI
>ta 1
> 1 i No
data
No data
No data
3-9
30
12.2
t2oo!^i
170 r01
10 ).feca
11
1
j
/
juu
140)
1
Belle Fourche River at
Wyoming-S. i/akota state
1 i ne
3-4
917
125.2
6.6
8.6
7.8
No value
26)
ll)°c
7.5
10.6
9.4
432
2470
1271
No data
3.00)NH3
).75)as N
)• 1 i+)Tota
0.02
0.88
1 0.35
^jjotal
No data
0. 20)Hg-
0 . 50 ) Tot;
0.32)ug/l
1 a11
' meta1s
numero
0.8
4. 2
JS 1.5
D.30)N°2
3.17)no3
N
n )
2000)fee
340 )
al
pes t i c1d
However,
1i mi ted
number 0
(
.00 >
4.1 )no3
0.-59)
analyses
-------
TA3L2 II - AMBIEK'T WATER QUALITY AT ;'¦ \R2ST LOWAS'L?^1. 1-'.0::ITC?.I.\:0' STATION'
Cheyenne River Basin (continued) pg. 2
3/;ic PAivr.^/ms - ;-:g/l uaz.^ afflicav.ls
flow
PH
.TEMP
°F
CO
TD3
IS .3
|
] TOTAL
P
(F2CAL)
(total)
p/.r:T_._ _
CREASE
L OIL
s.
TOXIC
I-1FTALS
ot;:er
toxics
1
5 Dav
BOD
- .VF.OL J'ODrr (hecc.wc.tsro)
Belle Fourche River
near Elm Springs - less
than 30 miles from con-
c 11 iprirp wi rh thp
10
2860
374
6.6
9-0
7.9
*Jo value
29)or
10)
4.8
12.9
9.3
512
4410
1845
si0 data
°-01)nh,
0.72)3
0.25)as ^
0.0
¦ 3.3
0.6
20 )
2400)Tot
5600)
>
3:
No
Data
0.20)Hg-
0.80) ,
0.50 )u9'
T ComDle
L
metals £
pesti ci c
te 0.2
f 16
3
es
O.OONO9
2 )
Cheyenne River
u-zu as
0.07
0.11)N0o
9 '1 ) ^
z$E>o)
440)Feca
etc. ret"
to pri ntc
SE 1
!
3*2) ^
!
'
I
]_/ Detailed river mi 1 a<
jes wi 1
be avs
i1able 7
/l/73
-------
SECTION F
TACTICAL SOLUTION
-------
'JI VZ'A S^S IN Cheyenne
,:astb:a.TlR solif.ce _ra"ith
MILE BeaverTirT~58/35/30
PV/PN
Lbs.
Haste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.058
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
30
TDS
319
TSS
11.6
NH3-N
Org-N
Total -N
12
Total-P
4
Fecal Coin.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oi1
Toxic Metals
Other Toxics
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj. 73
FY 72 Commits
74 75 76
15.5
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Secondary
Design P.E.
Present P.E. 580
Effluent Requirements
]. 30 mg/1 BOD = 14.5 1bs.
2. 30 rng/1 55 = 14.5 lbs.
3!
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
127
FV 73 74 Commits i Expected Incr. ;
74 75 76 ; 73
73
74 75 76
Total Commits
mzzmr
73
74
75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
w
w
IsT
1ST
Not on needs list
Total Reduction
TzT—j—rrr
73
74 75 76
0/0/15.5/15.5
ITT
PV
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
-------
KIVLiI DAS IN Cheverine
WASTEWATER SOURCE Sturgis
RIVER i-HEE Bear Butte Creek 90/8(7727
PV/PN 8/7
Dresent
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj. |73
FY 72 Commits
74 75 76
Waste Parameter
!
Flow, MGD
1 .500
I
PH
1
Temp, °F
B0D5
67
25
0/0/0/0
TDS
2495
TSS
91
49
0/0/0/0
NH3-N
Org-ft
Total-N
95
Total-P
32
Fecal Coli .
Total Coli.
Grease & Ci1
1
Toxic Metals ;
i
...Other Toxi cs |
(IT
Not on needs list
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Stabilization ponds
Design P.E. 6000
Present P.E. 4536
Effluent Requirements
1 10 mg/1 55 = 42 lbs.
2. 10 mg/1 BOD = 42 lbs.
Type Sewer (Combined or (Separate))
Lbs.
FY 12 ,74 Commits
73
75 76
0/25/25/25
0/49/49/49
74T
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
1/2/3/4
1/2/3/4
T5T
Total Commits
T3) + _(4)
73 74 75 76
0/25/25/25
0/49/49/49
(6)
Total P,'duction PV
~J?A. + (5)
73
7d 75
76
0/27/28/29
0/51/52/53
(7)
-------
RIV ii R B AS IN Chevenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE Newell
Lbs.
RIVER MILE Dry Creek 90/98/12
Total Commits
Total Reduction
COKKENTS
Type of Facility Stabilization Lagoon
Design P.E. 790
Present P.E. 664
Effluent Requirements.
1. 30 mg/1 55 = 12.5 lbs.
2.30 mg/1 BOD = 12/5 lbs.
Type Sewer (Combined or (Separate)
Not on needs list
PV
3resent
1 Load
Pres. Reduc. Req d
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 72 ,74 Commi ts
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 .'4 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Waste Parameter
Flow, MOD
.050
DNA
PH
DNA
Temp, °F
DNA
bod5
141
2
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0
0
0/0/0/2
1
/ 7DS
(assume 90% remov
n)3fi.3i
1
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0
0
0/0/0/1
1
TSS
1
NH3-N
.5
Org-N
.5
Total -N
14
1
Total-P
5
1
Fecal Coli.
. 5
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
DNA
Toxic Metals !
DNA
• -Other Toxics !
QN&
C.)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
6.5
-------
Hi YEP. CfiSIN Cheyenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE Whitewood
RIVER MILE Whitewood Creek
PV/PN 8/7
Waste Parameter
90/110/16
Present Pres. Reduc. Req'dl
Load to Meet EPA Obj. 173 74 75 76
Flow, KGD
.03
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
8.5
TDS
379
TSS
13.
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
14
Total-P
5
Fecal Coll.
1
Total Coin.
i
Grease 5 011 |
Toxic Metals !
J
Other Toxics 1
FY 72 Commits
n (2)
COMMENTS
Type of Facility stabilization pond
Design P.E. flow - .08 M90 or 800
Present P.E. 689
Effluent Requi rements.
} 30 mg/1 = 7.5 lbs.
30 mg/1 = 7.5 lbs.
3.
Type Sewer (Combired or Separate)
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
W
Lbs.
FY 73 ,74 Commits
73 /4 75 76
Expected Incr.
Total Commits
Total Reduction
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
W
T3) + (4)
73 74 75 76
u/O/u/O
0/0/0/0
AIL
LH
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/1
0/0/0/6
T5T
(6)
(7)
Note: Whitewood Creek changes from Class B to Class A on Dec. 31, 1973
PV
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
1
1
.5
.5
1
1
.5
.5
DNA
DNA.
DNA
7
-------
RIVER HAS IN r.havenne
WASTLW'.TLR snilf.r.E I gaH-Deadwood & Homestake
RIVER ill LE Whi tewood "Creekiy 10/^0
PV/PN 1A2
Waste Parameter
F'iow, MGD
Pil
Temp, °F
B0D5
Ti'S
t;,s
N113-N
O.-g-N
Total-N
Tjtal-P
Fecal Coll.
Total Co1i.
G-ease & Oil
Toxic Metals
. Other Toxics
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
3-9
8.7
kh W
6b S
1 226
5.*+71 ,843
213
71
J20/100 ml \
1300/100 m
CN 268
251
'70,870
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
0/0/251/251
0/0/5,470,870/
5,^70,870
268
268
of Lbs.
FY 72 ,74 Commits
73
75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
-w
Expected Incr.
74 Tfle
73
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
15T
Total Conmn Is
Tnnz®:
Total Reduction
73 74 75 " 76
0/0/0/251
0/0/0/5470870
Til
COMMENTS
T/pe of Facility Lead-2 Imhoff tanks & septic tanks. Deadwood-number of direct discharges
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
EFfluent Requirements
1. 975 lbs. (30 mg/l ) BOD) .p 12/^1/7"?
2. 975 lbs. (30 mg/l) SS )atCer
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
W
T2] t- C5T
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/251
0/0/0/5,470870
T7T
PV
DNA
DNA
DNA
5
1
3
3
0.5
1
1
5
0.5
DNA
5
3
28
-------
RIVER BAS IN Chevenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE Nisi and
RIVER MILE Rpllfr Fourche 9Q/12P.
PV/PN 8/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.015
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
(25.51)
TDS
86
TSS
22
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
3
Total-P
1
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic Ketals '
1
Other Toxi cs |
Pres. Reduc. Req'dl
to Meet EPA Ob,j. 173
FY 72 Commits
74 75 76
7TT
22
18
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
Lbs.
FY 73,74 Commits
73
75 76
0/0/22/22
0/0/18/18
Expected Incr
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
Total Reduction PV
73 74 75 76 73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
W
0/0/22/22
0/0/18/18
EL
73 74 75 76
0/0/22/22
0/0/18/1J
U) UT
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Imhoff tank with open sludge drying beds
Design P.E. 210
Present P. E. 57 .. . , ¦ nn
Effluent Requirements Proposed system - 1.25 acre stabilization pond in Interim Plan
1.30 mg/1 55 = 4 lbs.
2.30 mg/1 BOD = 4 lbs.
3.
UY
(6)
(7)
Type Sewer (Combined or (Separate
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
7
-------
!;!I'ER BASIN Cheyenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE USD! Spearfish National Fish Hatchery
RIVER MILE Separfish Creek
Lbs.
COMMENTS
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Co-r.bir.ed or Separate)
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 7
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
1600 GPD
PH
8.7
Temp, °F
37 W 50 S
B0D5
95.2
0
TDS
TSS
329
0
NH3-N
8.6
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
12
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli. j
Grease & 0'1 J
Toxic Metals ;
Other Toxi cs j
'4 75 76
ExDected Incr.
Total Commits
j3T
741"
73 74 75 76 73 74 75
76
Total Reduction
T2) + (5T
73 74 75 76
Lat 44-28-51
Long 103-51-40
solids in water are unused feed & fish fecal
U)
15T
(6)
(7)
PV
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
6
-------
RIVtK BASIN tne.yenne
vJASTEVSATER SOURCE Spearfish
RIVER HILESpearfish Creek 90/148/10/10
PV/PM 8/7 . .,
Pres. Reduc. Req d
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
IDS
TSS
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & 0<1
Toxic Metals
Other Toxi cs
Present
Load
.75 MGD
313
2563
250
97
33
FY 72 Commits
to Meet EPA Obj.
250
187
250/252/254/256
187/189/191/193
Lbs.
FY 73,74 Commits
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
Expected Incr.
74
0/2/4/6
0/2/4/6
Total Commits
HE
TT
Total Reduction PV
75 76
3H
73 74 75 76
"W
(5T
T1 (2T
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Imhoff tank, trickling filter, final clarifier, open sludge drying beds
Design P.E. 6200 (1990)
Present P.i. 4661 . . . .
Effluent Requirements Proposed project - 105 Ac. stabilization pond This project is to
1 10 mg/1 SS = 63 lbs. include Spearfish Valley Sanitary Dist. (1910 people)
2. 10 mg/1 BOD = 63 lbs. Presently under construction
3!
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
(6)
(7)
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
7
-------
RIVER BASIN Cheyenne
'..'ASTEKATER SOURCE Bell Fourche ~
RIVER MILE Belle Fourche 90/ IbU
Lbs.
Total Commits
Total Reduction
COMMENTS
Type of Facility stabilization ponds
Design P.E. 4000
Present P.E. 4236
Effluent Requirements
1. 30 mg/1 S5 = 75 1 bs.
2. 30 mg/1 BOD = 75 lbs.
3!
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
300
PH
Temp, °F
bod5
70
0
0
TDS
2330
TSS
80
0
°
NH3-M
Org-N
Total-N
88
Total-P
30
Fecal Col 1.
Total Coli.
Grease & 0i1
Toxi c Meta 1 s j
I
Other Toxn cs |
,'4 75 76
Expected Incr.
7 3 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
(4)
73
HI
74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
"W
(6)
(7)
Not on needs list
PV
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
7
-------
,W ,'lR 3 AS IN r.hpypnne .
'.JASTEWATER SOURCE f^-j 1 lptt.e. Wyoming
RIVER HUE
PV//i\ ~
JJ6/3Q
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
PH
Temp, °F
E0Ds
TDS
TSS
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Ci1
Toxic Metals
Other Toxi cs
Present
Load
NO DISCHAR
TO A
WATERCOURS
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Corrmits
Expected Incr
74 75 76
Total Commits
"35T
HL
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
HI
HI
73 74 75
76
I5T
"Til 13
COMMENTS r .s
Type of Facility No treatment provided (discharged to larK^Stone Pile Creek (dry )J
Design P.E.
Present P.E. 3580 Appl. in June'71 - Bids are to be let soon
Effluent Requirements- Proposed Facility is an activated sludge plant w/polishing pond discharge vnn go to
1, agricultural irrigation - no receiving water course
2.
Type Sewer (Combined or(Separate^
16T
TTT
-------
IM'/lR BASIN r.hpypnnp
H£ye
WASTEWATER SOURCE El 1 sworth AFB - Rapid City
RIVES MILE Box Elder Ck. 152/32
TT
Lbs.
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
l73 74 75 76
73
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
1.35
PH
6.2
Temp, °F
DC35
20 mg/1
226 lbs.
0
1
0 1
TDS
5500 lbs.
1
TSS
NH3- N
11 mg/1
124
0
0
Org-N
Total-N
210 lbs.
Total-P
70 lbs.
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & 0*1 j
Toxic Metals '
Other Toxi cs i
74 75 76
W
Excected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Conmii Is
T3T~jr~W
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
T2J + (5)
73 74 75 76
"757"
T2l (3T
COMMENTS
Type of Facility High rate trickling filter with Anaerobic sludge digestion
Design RXI.flow 1.75 MGD
Present P.E. 10,000
Effluent Requirements - Not on needs list
1. 30 mg/1 B0D=338 lbs. Some improper industrial waste disposal taking place
Z. 30 mg/1 55 = 338 lbs.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
(6)
(7)
PV
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
3
3
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
11
-------
RIVER BASIN Cheyenne
WASTEWATER SOURCEUSAF~E11sworth flFB
VER MILE Box Elder, Cr.
Lbs.
Total Commits
Total Reduction
COMMENTS
TOLat 44-07-40 JJY
Type of Facility SJ^-o'fff™ aircraft dock area discharge Is computed on rainfall S paved dock area
7)
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1. 30 mg/1
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Con.bired or Separate)
PV
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 "Hiorram ts
FY 73.74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 \/5 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
0.066
PH
7.2 - 7.7
Temp, °F
varies w/
storm water
\
1
B0D5
5.6
0
1
1
1
TDS
335
!
1
TSS
28
12
0/0/0/0
0/12V12/12
0
0/12/12/12
0/12/12/12
0-5
!-:¦¦[ 3-N
0.5
Org-N
0.5
Total-N
0.5
Total-P
0.1
DNA
Fecal Coli.
DNA
Total Coli.
DNA
Grease S Oil
0.5
Toxi c Meta 1 s t
cn
.01 mg/1
Of CN
1
DNA
Other Toxi cs 1
\
fi R
-------
RIVER OASiK Chpyenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE" S. Dakota Cement Planir, Rapid City
RIVER MILE Unnamed to Rapid Cr.
PV/PN 7/8.5
Present | Pres. Reduc. Req'dl FY 72 Commits
Load
to Meet EPA Ob.i ¦ 173 74 _ 75 76.
0.1
8.5
65W
70S
3.1
257
19
Haste Parameter
7 i ow, KGO
PH
Temp, °F
,30D5
TDS
TSS
3rg-N
Total-M ^
}
Total-P j
Fecal Coll. j 20,000/100
Total Cor.. |21,000/10Cj
Grease I O11 j
Tox",c "etaIs ;
Other Toxics
3.1
19
20,000/100
21/000/1 CO
T~5 La t-44-05-72 (2V
Long 103-16-00'
0/20,000/0/0
21,000/100
21,000/100
21,000/100
T3T
Lbs.
FY 73 ,74 Comroits
73 '4 75 76
0/3/3/3
0/19/19/19
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
1ST
C°'""Type of Facility septic tank"1 overflow and resulting process water from portland cement wet process
Design P.EL
Present P.c,
Effluent Requi rements-
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Total Commits
T3T~t"l4l
73 74 75 76
0/3.1/3.1/3.1
0/19/19/19
Total Reduction
HE
PV
73 74 75 76
0/3.1/3.1/3.1
0/19/19/19
0/20M/100/20M/100/
20M/100
0/21M/l00/21M/l00/
21 ,000/100
0/20M/100/20M/100
21M/100/21M/l00/
21 M/l00
(6)
(7)
1
1
1
DNA
DMA
DNA
DNA
5
0.5
ONA
DNA
DNA
8.5
-------
VCR BASIN
¦ -."E'.'.'AJER SOURCE Rapid City
Thpypnrip
RiV-R nILE Rapid Creek 166/43
Pv/?i{ 3/13
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'dl
to Meet EPA Obj. I 73
FY 72 Commits
T1 [27
COMMENTS
Type of Facility-High rate trickling filter
Design P.E. design MGD 13.500
Present P.E. 42,300
Effluent Requirements
1 30 mg/1 BOD = 1001 lbs.
2. 30 mg/1 55 = 1001 lbs.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Lbs.
FY 73 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
23/46/70/95
25/51/79/107
T5T
Total Commi ts
(3) + (4")
Total Reduction
PV
73 74 . 75 76
23/46/70/95
25/51/79/107
TFT
mzizEr
73 74 /5 76
23/46/70/95
i 25/51/79/107
T7T
DNA
DNA
DNA
3
1
1
0.5
0.5
3
3
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
13
Not on needs list
-------
RIVER BASIN Cheyenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE til rdsa I I Sand & Gravel - Oral Sand PI ant, Rapid City
RIVER MILE
Lbs.
PV/PN_
rhpypnnp RM 227
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 72,74 Commits
Expected Incr.
Load
73 74 75 76
73 /4 75 76
73 74 75 76
Parameter
Flow, MGD
0.4
PH
7.6
Temp, °F
72s ice W
B0D5
11.2
TDS
781
TSS
6242
6,142
0/0/0/0
0/6,142/6,142/6,142
0/0/0/0
NH3-1N
Org-N
Total-N
i
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oi1
Toxic Metals
• Other Toxics
1
-
Total Commits
(3) + (4T
73 74 75 76
0/6,142/6,142/6,142
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)"
73
74 75 76
0/6,142/6,142/6,142
PV
(6r
(7)
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
3
COMMENTS Long 103-15-57
Type of Facility $ancj washing, aoprox 7 months/year
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1. 30 mg/1 100 lb. .
2.
3.
Type Sevier (Combined or Separate)
-------
RIVER BASIN Cheyenne
¦ .'ASTEWATER SOURCE Dakota Biock Co. Rapid City
RIVER MILE Headwater To Gi^'s Pond
—vm
Lbs.
PV/PN
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
900 GPD
PH
0.5
Temp, °F
212 .
bod5
.007
TDS
6
TSS
.06
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
0
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease L Oil
Toxic Meta is
Other Toxics
COMMENTS
'resent
Load
Pres. Reduc. Reo'd F^ 72 Commits
TT
76
Expected Incr.
73
74 75 76
73
Total Commits
~~V$) + WT
74 75 76
Total Reduction
T2) + (5)
PV
73 74 75
76
lat 44-0-35 long ^3 -10-39
Type of facility concrete Masonry Products - discharge is condensate from boilers
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combir.ed or Separate)
w
~VT
i
i
l
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
3
-------
P. i VEP. ESIN Chevenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE Pete Lien & Sons Inc. Quarry & Lime Plant, Rapid City
RIVER MILE Intermittent Stream - no name
DV/PN 13/2.5
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
0.1
PH
7.71
Temp, °F
53.5
BCD5
0.33
TDS
88
TSS
0
UH3-N
Crg-N
Total-N
Total-P
0.16
Fecal Coll.
Total Coli.
Grease l> Ci 1
Toxic Ketals !
I
Other Toxi cs |
nr
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
Lbs.
FY 72,74 Commits
73
75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
"W
"T4T
Total Commits
J3X
IK
73
74 75
76
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
PV
C0f'KcNTS ;Lat 44-06-49LWg 103-16-56
Type of Facility Limestone calcining producing lime products, water used to cool air-fuel distributors
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
(6)
(7)
1
1
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
2.5
-------
•M'.'ER LAS IN Cheyenne
l.'ASTEliAlER SOURCE Air products & Chemicals, Rapid City
;rVER MILE Intermittent stream to Rapid Creek
Lbs.
Total Commits
Total Reduction
PV
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73.74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
I
Load
73 74 75 76
73 74 7a 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
.00945
PH
7
Temp, °F
60 w 65 s
BOD-
3
0
0
DNA
TDS
28
1
TSS
1
i
DNA
NH3-N
DNA
Org-N
DNA
Total-N
ONA
Total -P
.0079
DNA
Fecal Coli.
DNA
Total Co 1 i -
DNA
Grease & Oil j
;
DNA
Toxic Metals ;
DNA
Other Toxi cs
DNA
COMMENTS L&t'44-03-20 Long ^3-11-30
Type of Facility cooling water used for compressors (industrial Oz)
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requi rements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Coir.oir.ed or Separate)
13T
(6)
(7)
-------
Cheyenne
P.l'.'L-R BASH!
WASTEWATER SOURCE Hi lT City
RIVER MILE Spring Creek 171/6iT"
P V/P.N "2/15.5
^resent
I Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd| rY 72 Commits
Lbs.
FY 72 ,74 Commits
to Meet EPA Ob.j. 173 74 75 76 73 74 75 76
.06
501bs.
344 lb.
27.5 lbs
131b.
4 lb.
45.lbs.
23 lb.
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
PH
Temp, °F
20D-
o
TDS
TSS
j
:;h3-n ;
Org-M !
Total-N I
Total-P J
Fecal Coli . j
Total Coli . j
Grease & Oi 1 I
I
Toxic Metals j
. Other Toxi cs (
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Trickling Filters (standard rate)
Design P.E. 900 (tourists)
Present P.E. 625 (tourists)
Effluent Requirements
1. 10 mg/1 ss=5 lb.
2. 10 mg/1 B0Dp5 lb.
3. 5
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
45/45/46/47
23/23/23/24
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
TW
Expected Incr
73 74 75 76
i 0/0.5/1/1.5
0/.2/.4/.6
Total Commit:,
73 74 75 76
45/45/46/47
23/23/23/24
Total Reduction
jiEzmr
73 74 75 76
45/45/46/47
23/23/23/24
"TsT
(6)
(7)
Construction has just been completed at Hill City o
Outfall line, Stabilization pond and polishing pond
PV
DNA
DNA
DNA
5
5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
15.5
-------
RIVER BASIN C.hevenne
'JASTEUAi ER SOURCE Hermosa
RIVER MILE
PV/PN
Rattle Creek 190/24
8/7
Present
Load
Waste Parameter
Fiov,, I-IGD
PH
Temp, °F
EOD5
Pres. Reduc. Req1d
to Meet EPA Ob.i73
FY 72 Commits
74 75 76
0.0125
(lOOgal/cajji/day)
IDS
TSS
r;H3-rJ
Org-N
Total-N
Tota".-P
Fecal Con.
Total Coli.
Grease & Ci1
Toxic l-'.etals
I
..Other Toxicsi
2
69
2.5
2.6
1
;d 1 &t~
COKKENTS
Type of Facility Stabilization lagoon
Design P.E. Design MOD = .028
Present P.E. 125
Effluent Requirements
]. 30 mg/1 BOD = 316"
2. 30 mg/1 SS = 316
Type Sewer (Combir.ed or(separa£p)
"W
Not on needs list
Lbs.
FY 72 .74 Conirmts
73 ;4 75 76
Expected Incr.
"73 74 75 76
TsT
Total Commits Total Reduction PV
T^r^DiZZT 12) ± 1
73 74 75 76 "
"W
73 74 75 76
TT
-------
st
?i/P
R i3AS IN fhpypnnp
V:ATEr< SOURCE" r.nst.er
R MiLc pypnrh Creek 195/55.
5/9.5
I
Present
Load
Haste Parameter
Flow, KGD
PH
Temp, °F
20=5
TDS
TSS
KHs-N
Org-N
7o:al-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Tocal Ccli.
Grease & Ci 1
Toxic Metals
-Other Toxi cs
Pres. Reduc. Req1d
to feet EPA Obj.
73
FY 72 Commits
76
74 75
IMax.490
iAve . 389
¦Mm .173
|Max 7.8
iMi n 7.5
j 162
j 17 88
I
: 144
I High 58
j 23
! 16,425/lOOnjl
130
82
n : flT
COMMENTS
Type of Facility-Trickling Filler
Design P.E. 9250 (tourists)
Present P.I. 3250
Effluent Requirements
] 10 mg/1 B0D=32 lbs.
2. 10 mg/1 SS 32 lbs.
Type Sewer (Coinlj i r.ed or (Separate)
1 30/135/140/145
82/85/88/91
"W
73
W
"W
Lbs.
To; a 1 Coi.v.;i '
Tot'il Reduction
74 Commits i Expected Incr.
(3) + (!
(2) ^ (d)
'4 ' 75 76 1 73 /4 75 lb
73 74 7s> 76
73 74 7a 76
] Assume 3%
5
i ,
! 162
j x390 j
0 0 0 j 0/5/10/15
i
130/135/140/145
130/135/140/145
1
o 0 0 ; 0/3/6/9
82/85/88/91
82/85/88/91
I
(6)
Grant offer out 3-31-71 for upgrading existing system plus
polishing ponds. Under construction
(7)
PV
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
3
0.5
DNA
DNA
9.5
-------
i¦ IVbR SASIN Cheyenne
'.-.'ASTEWATER SOURCE Hot Springs
¦51'.'Eft MILE Fall River ?WE~
PV/Pfl
8/7
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
PH
Present
Load
.7Ave
Temp, °F
B0D5
117
TDS
2439
TSS
178
NH3-N
Org-N
High
Total
92
Total-P
31
Fecal Coll .
Total Coli.
Crease & Oi1
Toxi c Metal s f
|
Other Toxi cs t
Pres. Reduc. Req'dl
to Meet EPA Obj. 173
FY 72 Commits
74 75 76
COMMENTS
T
59
120
Lbs.
FY 73,74 Commits
73
/4 75
0/0/59/59
0/0/120/120
76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Coirain is
kd::
Total Reduction
73 74
75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
0/0/59/59
0/0/120/120
74)
157
(6)
Type of FaciJMt^
in
HZ
0/0/59/59
0/0/120/120
121 (TT
grit chamber, comminuter, primary se+. tank, trickling filter, final set.tank, digesters
Design P.E.
Effl uent^Requi rements Proposed 70 acre stabilization pond - one 40 and one 30 - discharge to Cheyenne River
1. 10 mg/1 BOD = 58 lbs. No application yet
2. 10 mg/1 SS = 58 lbs.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
(7)
PV
73 74 75 76
DNA
DNA
DNA
1
T
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DNA
DNA
7
-------
VI;
Cheyenne
¦ iA i Lrs SOUKCL Mines Dev. Inc. (3 Edgemont
iVCi\ MILE Cheyenne & Cottonwood Cr. 205
!1V /!' i 1 6/9
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Flou, ;iGD
Pll
Temp, °F
B0D5
TDS
TSS
nh3-n
Org - ;'J
Total -N
Total-P
Fecal Col i.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic i'etals
Other Toxics
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc I'.-q'd
to Meet EP/\ C.ij.
Seepage
As far as Cot
6.3 t
Seepage also
tonwood Creek is coicerned, the seepage
o 6.4 near the confluence.
Eliminate seepage.
increases the disso
FY 72 Commits | FY 73. 74 Commits 1 Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76 j 73 74 75 76 I 73 74 75 76
ved sol ids level in
produces a significa
it pH drop: On the o
Cottonwood Creek.
•der of 7.0 DO 7.3 upstream -
3.0 jjcj/Hg on Cheyenne from 2.1 uq/V
Increased concentrations of dissolv
"01 (21 [37
radium-226 and uranium in Cottonwood
Creek; no significant increases in the
dissolved radioactivity levels in Cheyenne
River. Sealing ponds will eliminate the losses
of radioactive materials to the water
envi ronment.
upstream, however,1 this is not to be at
origin, jlron and vanadium con
ed seepage, j
W
Total Commits Total Reduction
(3) + (4) (2) + (5F
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
tributed to mill seepage. The difference
centrations are increased in the creek a
W
is of natural
the result of
Try
CO'inEi'JTS :
Tyoe of Faci 1 i ty
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requi renents"
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate
-------
,?IVER BASIS Chevenne
WASTEWATER SOURCE Upton, Wyo.
3 i V EK MILE Beaver Ck. 298/71
PV/Pii 8/7
I'resent
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req1dj
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
Waste Parameter
Flow. XGQ
lOOgped
COMMENTS
Type of Facility Stabilization Lagoons
Design P.E.
Present P.E. /'Zx-O
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sevier (Coii.bired or Separate)
Lbs.
FY 73 ,74 Coir-mi ts
73 /4 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
I 0/0/0/0
"(By-
Total Com,nits
nszizn:
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
(6)
Total Reduction PV
" (2) + 15) 1
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
0/0/0/0
(7)
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
DNA
DMA
DNA
7
-------
I .'Mil Cheyenne
i!;,¦ , >; U SOUUCL Kieslinq Oil Co. Osage , Wyo.
TAIil.i:
Mush Creek
li/j^
FTTFCcwmi ts ! JXlA- J^oinwrts^
73 74 75 X6" 73 74 75 76
Ot y-i!
T o t a 1 - N
Total -P
Fecal Col i.
Total Coll.
Grease & Oil
Toxic iistal s
Other Toxics . , _
~ni (2r
CO'-'h'Hi!TS: Lat. 43-48-05 Long. 104-26-30
Type? of Facility- Discharge occurs 2-3 times/year
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirer.ients
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
0/10/10/10
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
0/0/0/0
T&7
Total Commits Total Reduction
-7377^7(47 j
73 74 75 76
0/10/10/10
w
7T 74 75 . 76
0/10/10/10
TTT
PV
l)N A
1
0.5
DNA
1
1
UNA
DNA
DNA
1
DNA
DNA
4.5
-------
RIVER BASIN Chevenne .
K'ASTEMTER snwir. F key stone - Mt. Rushmore Sanitary Dist.
RIVER MTIF Rattle Creek 190/40
;; r——n~7__ Dor,'hI py 72 Commits
Waste Parameter
Flow, NGD
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
TDS
TSS
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & O'l
Toxic Metals i
Other Toxics
5resent
Load
NO DIRECT
DISCHARGE
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 W
73 ".'4
Expected Incr
73 74 "
Total Conmii t •
ZSCJ—151 . _
75 76 i 73 74 7b 76
Total Reduction
TT
T2T
"W
COMMENTS . , . u
Type of Facility unsewered privies, cesspools, septic tanks with soil absorption systems
Design P.E. 2880 (1990 w/tourists)
EfflueJtPR^qu\>e0JntsUrlStS) Proposed system - 2 phases Phase I - treatment facilities, aerated pood-followed bv a
1. 10 mg/1 BOD polishing pond (5.5 acres)
2. 10 mg/1 SS
Type'sewer (Combined or Separate) II - complete collection system at Keystone
-------
SECTION F
TACTICAL SOLLUTIONS
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
1
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actior.s
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Initiation Completion
Program
Element
FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
On a "worst" condition basis, violations
of Water Ouality Standards have occurred
in the Belle Fourche River below
Whitewood Creek and in the Cheyenne River
below Wasta.
Although the basin has little in the way
of heavy industry and a low population
density, it contains widespread water
pollution oroblems as a result of three
major factors. First, tourist traffic is
substantial in population centers
located in relatively small areas that
have noorly operated facilities. Second,
process wastes and minetailings from the
Homestake Mining ComDany and radium
nuclides introduced by seepage from Mines
Development, Inc. act as conservative
pollutants for several hundred miles
downstream. Third nonpoint sources as
yet unquantified create sediment and
solids problems. Collectively, these
discharges threaten the continued use of
Basin Surface waters for water supply,
agriculture, and recreation.
An Enforcement Conference was held to
consider the occurrence, distribution,
and significance of cyanide mercury,
and other metals pollution in western
South Dakota. The conferees made
several recommendations and approved
an iniDlementation schedule for the
abatement of these pollutants.^ These
recommendations will be discussed later
in the situation analysis.
1. Encourage and assist States to enforce WD
standards.
2. Assure proper completion of construction of
municipal facilities now underway and help
municipalities needing wastewater treatment
facilities to finance construction of these
facilities through our construction grant
program.
3. Assist the States in developing a comorehen-
sive monitoring program for waters in the
basin.
4. Obtain letters of commitment from industrial
dischargers to reduce the discharge of
pol1utants.
5. Assist state in conducting O&fl studies on all
WWTP in Basin
6. Assist states with operator training nrogram
for all WWTP in Basin.
7. Carry out recommendations of the enforcement
conference.
8. Continue with Black Hills 3(c) Grant
9. Review of environmental statements of
municipal facilities and 3(c) Grant.
* These actions will be changed to permit actions
immediately under the new legislation as soon
as guidelines are available.
Conti
Ongoing
fluing
12/31/75
Contir uing
Onaoina
3/73
Cont
12/1/74
continuina
nuing
Contlnui na
Onaoina
1/15/73
10/1/73
conti-nui ng
3B1^I 23
2B8162
2B8316
2B3149
2B6116
2B3149
2B2147
3R2124
2B1143
2B6116
2B8163
2B7160
3B1123
2B3149
2B1143
2B6117
.35
2.3
0.9
1.5
0.1
0.2
0.25
6.0
0.8
0.2
1.5
0.9
5.0
1.5
0.4
5.6
0.1
4.1
0.9
0.4
O.l
0.25
6.0
0.6
1.5
1.5
4.5
0.5
0.4
0.1
2.10
0.4
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.1
1.'
1.0
1.5
-------
2
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Situation Analysis
Whitewood Creek is presently classified
as a Class "B" stream or one that has
no designated beneficial use. The
State has scheduled a change in
classification of this Creek to Class
"A" after 12/31/73.
After the disastrous floods of June
9-10, 1972 in the Black Hills area,
Rapid City is considering rezoning
the flood plain area through the city
for recreational purposes. This may
mean reclassifying Rapid Creek through
the city from limited contact recrea-
tion to immersion sports.
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
10". Initiate an aggressive public information
campaign to create public awareness and
support for programs designed to abate and
control pollution in the Cheyenne River Basin.
11. Continue participation on flood recovery task
force.
12. Conduct inventory of all public water supplies
including information concerning population
served, treatment, production, and capacity.
13. Monitoring The Cheyenne Basin Accomplishment
Plan.
Dates
Initiation Completion
1/15/73
ongoing
11/72
ongoing
Continuing
indefinite
6/73
continuing
Program
Element
5T£215
2B3149
2B3150
2C5226
2B3149
FY 73
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
2.0
1.2
2.0
1.0
FY 74
1.0
0.5
1.0
FY 75
0.5
FY 76
0.25
0.5
i
-------
3
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Situation Analysis
1. MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
Many of the water quality problems in the
basin result from improperly treated
municipal and industrial wastes. To
maintain or enhance the water quality in
the basin, the strategy is to construct
eight municipal wastewater treatment
facilities and one Federal facility.
These facilities will reduce the average
daily BOD^ and TSS loads by 903 and
5,477,645 pounds respectively by FY-76.
However, to insure that these reduction
goals are realized, a strong O&M program
must be developed and maintained.
LEAD-DEADWOOD SANITARY DISTRICT
Whitewood Creek, the Belle Fourche River
and the Cheyenne River are grossly
polluted by mine tailings and process
wastes from the Homestake Mining Company
and municipal wastes from the cities of
Lead & Deadwood. The Lead-Deadwood
Sanitary District organized to develop
a sewerage system to treat municipal
and industrial wastes, recommended the
construction of a waste stabilization
pond which would provide for adequate
treatment of the combined wastes as well
as storage of tailings from the gold-
mining operations. An application for
$1.79 million in Federal assistance was
filed with EPA on 4/12/71. A draft ES
was prepared and a public hearing was
held at Deadwood 12/21-22/71.
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Regionalization was considered but was generally
found to be infeasible with the exception of the
Lead-Deadwood Sanitary District.
1. Work out agreement with BuRec to serve as a
consultant to EPA on the structural design of
the tailings pond.
2. Complete plans & specifications.
3. State & Federal approval of plans & specifica-
tions .
4. Award contract
5. Complete construction & place project in
operation,
6. Assist the State in establishing monitoring
stations above and below the WWTP for
monitoring of instream water quality. Also
monitor "quality of effluent.
Dates
Initiation Completion
11/1/72
10/1/74
12/1/72
8/15/73
9/30/73
3/1/74
11/1/75
Continuing
Program
Element
2B8162
2B8162
State
2B8162
2B8316
2B8162
2B8316
2B2147
0.2
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.5
0.1
1.5
0.1
.05
0.8
0.1
0.05
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
4
Recommended Actions
Dates
Program
Manpower Required
Situation Analysis
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Ini tiation
Completion
Element
(Prof.-
Man -
Mos.)
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
A final statement was transmitted
4/15/72 to CEQ and interested parties.
Grant offer was made 4/24/72. Please
note that this schedule is significantly
different from the approved schedule
of the Enforcement Conference. This is
because of the delay required to fully
evaluate environmental considerations.
Waste load reductions expected are
251 lb/da BOD5 and 5,470,870 lb/da TSS.
7.
Prepare O&M manual, assist state in
monitoring the operation and management of
the WWTP. Operator training.
10/1/74
Continuing
2B§163
0.2
0.2
0.2
HILL CITY WWTP
Existing facility causing public
health hazard to Spring Creek
concerning swimming and fishing.
New facility is now under construc-
tion. Waste load reductions
expected are 35 lb/day BOD^ and
28 lb/da TSS.
1.
2.
Complete construction of treatment facility
now underway.
Assist state in establishing monitoring
stations on Spring Creek above and below Hill
City WWTP. Also test quality of effluent
discharged after new treatment facility
begins operation.
12/70
10/31/72
2B8162
2B8316
2B2147
.2
.1
.05
.05
.0
CUSTER
3.
Prepare O&M manual, assist state in monitoring
the O&M of the WWTP, operator training.
2B8163
0.2
The existing project is causing a
public health hazard and pollution
problems on French Creek in regards
to fishlife and recreation. Grant
offer made for construction of new
treatment facilities plus upgrading
of present facilities on-3-31-71.
Presently under construction.
Expected waste load reductions are
90 lb/da B0D5 and 79 lb/da TSS.
1.
2.
3.
Complete construction of facility
Assist the city through the State in establish-
ing monitoring a station on French Creek below
Custer - also test quality of effluent
discharged after new treatment facility begins
operation.
O&M, manual and training.
12/70
10/73
10/1/73
Continuing
2B8162
2B8316
2B2147
.4
.1
0.2
.2
.1
.05
0.1
.05
-------
TABLE
III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
5
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Initiation
Completion
1/15/73
4/1/73
10/74
10/74
3/15/73
Indefinite
1/15/74
3/15/74
4/15/74
5/15/74
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76
NISLAND
Discharging high BOD & TSS loads to the
Belle Fourche River. Present system
consist of an Imhoff tank with open
sludge drying beds. Interim plan
identified a need for a 1.25 acre
stabilization pond. Town given a dead-
line by state of 1/72 for completion
of adequate facilities. At present
progress is very slow. Expected waste
load reductions are 22 lb/da BODc and
18 lb/da TSS.
STURGIS
Portions of the collection system is old
and in a poor state of repair. The
interceptor line to the treatment
facility is currently overloaded
primarily because of groundwater infil-
tration into the collection system. As
a result of the hydraulic ov erload, high
BOD5 and TSS loads are discharged.
Replacement of several collection lines
will relieve the overload on the inter-
ce ptor to a certain extent. Expected
waste load reductions are 12 lb/da BOD5
and 25 lb/da TSS.
1. Work with City and State to influence the City
to apply for a construction grant for FY-74.
2. Award grant
Review plans & specifications environmental
statement, complete project.
Prepare O&M manual. Assist state in monitoring
O&M of the WWTP. Operator training
If no interest is shown in abating, pollution
after completion of Task 1, encourage state
to proceed with enforcement action.
Work with State and City to encourage repair
and upgrading of collection system.
Contact state on Sturgis applying for Grant
if necessary after considering improvements
from collection system repair.
Preapplication Conference.
Application review and process grant award.
2B8162
2B8316
2B3149
2B8316
2B8162
2B6117
2B8163
3B1123
2B8162
2B8162
2B8162
2B8162
2B8316
2B3149
.2
.5
.1
.4
1.8
0.2
0.25
.1
.4
0.1
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.1
0.10
0.4
-------
6
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Situation Analysis
1
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Initiation Completion
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
FY 73 FY 74 FY 75 FY 76
Sturgis (continued)
RAPID CITTf
There is presently no problem with the
Rapid City WWTP. Plant has sufficient
capacity for the near future, however,
since Rapid City is the largest city in
the area and discharges a relatively
large effluent into a small stream,
operation and maintenance practices
should be monitored.
HOT SPRINGS
Present facility does not adequately
treat the city's wastes. Effluent
discharge to Fall River is creating
a hazard to public health. The city
is not presently totally sewered for
collection of wastes. Expected waste
load reductions are 59 lb/da BOD5
and 120 lb/da TSS.
5. Review specifications and environmental
statement, begin construction.
6. Complete construction and final inspection.
7. Assist in the upgrading of O&M practices.
1. "Monitor O&M practices of WWTP to insure opera-
tion at high efficiency.
2. Assist the city and state in establishing
monitoring stations above and below WWTP
outfall. Monitor
6/1/74
12/1/74
-Coi tinuing
Conl inuing
6/1/73
Continuing
1. Preapplication meeting
2. Work with State to influence Hot Springs to
apply for grant FY-73.
3. Award Grant
4. Review specifications, review environmental
statement, complete construction.
5. Prepare O&M manual. Assist State in monitoring
O&M program. Operator training.
1/15/73
3/15/73
6/15/73
10/1/74
10/1/74
2B8162
2B8316
2B6117
2B8162
2B8163
2B8163
2B2147
2B8162
2B8162
2B6117
2B8316
2B3149
2B8162
2B8163
0.1
.05
.05
.2
.5
.4
0.1
0.10
0.10
1.8
.2
0.1
0.1
0.05
1 .8
.1
.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
.1
0.1
0.1
0.05
0. 1
0.1
0.05
.1
.2
.2
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
7
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
DATES
PROGRAM
MANPOWER REQUIRED
SITUATION ANALYSIS
BY
SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
INITIATION
COMPLETION
ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
M0S)
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Hot Springs (continued)
6.
Assist the city thru the state in
establishing a monitoring station on Fall
River below Hot Springs also test quality
of effluent discharged after new treatment
facility begins operation.
10/1/74
Continuing
2B2147
.1
0.05
SPEARFISH
Facilities are overloaded and not
adequately treating the wastes of the
city. Discharge is adversely
affecting water quality of Spearfish
Creek, a high quality stream. Present
operating under a conditional state
permit. 105 ac stabilization pond is
presently under construction.
Expected waste load reductions are
250 lb/da BOD5 and 187 lb/da TSS.
1.
2.
¦y
3.
Complete construction of stabilization
pond.
Assist the city through the state to
establish monitoring stations on Spearfish
Creek above and below facility and monitor.
Prepare O&M manual. Assist state in
carrying out an O&M program. Operator
training.
12/1/72
11/1/72
11/15/72
Continuing
Continuing
ZBSlteZ
2B8316
2B2147
2B8163
.2
0.1
.05
0.2
.05
0.1
.05
KEYSTONE- MT. RUSHMORE SANITARY
DISTRICT
There is no direct discharge to a
Watercourse. Present types of
facilities are unsewered privies,
cesspools, septic tanks with soil
adsorption systems. The disposal
methods employed throughout the
District are inadequate and are
creating ground and surface water
quality problems plus a hazard to
public health. Original plans were to
construct a regional treatment facilit
at Harney and an interceptor line
from the facilities to Mt. Rushmore
and a partial collection system in
1.
2.
3.
4.
Work with city and state to influence
Keystone to apply for a construction
grant.
Review construction specifications for
Mt. Rushmore facility.
Pre-application hearing for Keystone.
Approve application.
1/1/73
3/1/73
4/1/73
3/15/73
ZB&lbZ
2B8316
2B8162
2B3149
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.S
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RISPONSIB1LITY
DATES
INITIATION
COMPLETION
7/1/73
9/1/73
9/1/74
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MPS)
KEYSTONE (continued)
Keystone. However, present plans call
for separate treatment facilities for
Keystone and Mt. Rushmore. Performanc
specifications for the Mt. Rushmore
treatment facility have been reviewed
and approved by EPA. Construction
is scheduled for completion in
July 1973.
INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES
Wastewater flows and concentrations
can be reduced and in some cases
eliminated through the implementation
of the Permit Program"thru letters
of commitments rom the various
affected industries. Our goal will
be to require industries to meet
water quality standards, to discharge
no effluents that have not had the
equivalent of secondary treatment,
and not to discharge toxic or
potentially toxic materials. This
will require the processing nine
letters of commitment. The industria
cischarges from Homestake Mining Co.
will be treated by the Lead-Deadwood
Sanitary District facilities.
* These actions will be changed
as soon as guidelines are avai
5. Award Grant
6. Begin construction
7. Complete Construction & Inspection
8. Monitor effluent. Assist Keystone thru the
state to establish necessary monitoring
stations.
9. Prepare O&M manuals. Assist state in
carrying out an O&M program. Operator
training.
9/1/74 Continuing
to permit actions immediately under the new
"able.
9/1/73
1 egi si ati on
Cont inuing
2B8316
2B8162
2B8162
2B8316
2B2147
2B8163
.1
.5
.2
.1
.05
0.1
.2
.1
.05
CtL
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
9
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
Initiation
Completion
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
MINES DEVELOPMENT INC.
Seepage from uranium & vanadium waste
1.
Sealed storage for liquid uranium and
10/15/71
1/1/73
3B2124
0.6
storage ponds enter Cottonwood Creek
vanadium mill wastes.
and the Cheyenne River in the vicinity
of the mill causing localized water
2.
Work with state and industry-to develop a
10/15/71
2/15/72
3B2124
0.6
quality degradation. Water and wind
plan for the stabilization and ultimate
transport of unstabilized sand tailings
.disposal of sand tailings.
are potential sources of water quality
degradation and increased levels of
3.
Water quality monitoring program EPA/State.
7/1/72
Continuing
3B2124
0.2
0.2
radiation exposure to the resident
population (via wind transport of
4.
EPA progress report to Conferees.
11/72
3B2123
0.05
particulates and radon-222 emissions).
SOUTH DAKOTA CEMENT PLANT
Septic Tank overflow into an unnamed
1 .
Recommend connection to Rapid City sewer.
10/31/72
3B2124
0.4
tributary to Rapid Creek causing
potential health hazard.
2.
Receive letter of commitment.
1/1/73
3B2124
0.5
3.
Actual connection.
6/1/73
3B2124
0.3
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
10
Recommended Actions
Dates
Program
Manpower Required
Situation Analysis
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Initiation|Completion
Element
(Prof
Man -
Mos.)
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
USAF ELLSWORTH AFB
Storm runoff from aircraft dock area.
Have applied for a permit.
1.
Develop effluent criteria to reduce solids
and other potentially toxic substances.
3/1/73
9/1/73
3B2124
2B1143
2B6116
2B3149
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
2.
Meet with AF officials to develop commitment
letter.
6/1/73
3/1/74
3B2124
2B6116
0.3
0.10
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
3/1/74
3/1/75
3B2124
0.5
0.2
SPEARFISH NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY
There is a potential for discharge
of nutrients and organic materials
to Spearfish Creek.
1.
2.
Develop effluent criteria to maintain or
improve present quality of effluent.
Commitment letter.
1/1/73
4/1/73
4/1/73
6/1/73
2B3149
3B2124
2B1143
2B6116
3B2124
2B6116
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.8
0.1
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
6/1/73
6/1/74
3B2124
0.5
0.2
KIESLING OIL COMPANY
Potential for discharge of oil and
sol ids to Mush Creek.
1 .
Develop effluent criteria to reduce the
discharge of dissolved solids and maintain
or reduce other potentially toxic materials.
6/1/73
12/1/73
3B2124
2B1143
2B3149
0.5
0.2
0.2
2.
Commitment letter.
12/1/73
3/1/74
3B2124
0.3
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
3/1/73
12/1/74
3B2124
0.4
0.2
-------
TABLE III - INILGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
n
Recommended Actions
Dates
Program
Manpower Required
Situation Analysis
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Ini tiati on|Completion
Element
(Prof.-
Man -
Mos.)
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
BIRDSALL SAND & GRAVEL ORAL SAND PLANT
Potential porblem from TSS discharges
into Cheyenne River from sand washing
operation.
1.
Develop effluent criteria for suspended
solids to include sedimentation ponds.
1/1/73
4/1/73
3B2124
2B1143
2B3149
0.5
.2
.2
2.
Letter of commitment.
4/1/73
6/1/73
3B2124
0.3
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
6/1/73
6/1/74
3B2124
0.5
0.2
DAKOTA BLOCK CO. RAPID CITY
Potential TDS problem.
1.
2.
Effluent criteria to maintain or reduce
solids if determined to be necessary.
Letter of Commitment.
1/1/73
4/1/73
4/1/73
6/1/73
2B1143
3B2124
2B3149
3B2124
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.3
3.
Ilonitor effluent to see if in compliance.
6/1/73
6/1/74
3B2124
0.5
0.2
PETE LIEN & SONS, INC. RAPID CITY
Discharging phosphorus and dissolved
solids.
1 .
Develop standards to maintain or reduce
nutrient and TDS loadings Commitment letter.
1/1/73
4/1/73
2B3149
3B2124
2B1143
.2
0.5
.2
2.
Commitment letter.
4/1/73
6/1/73
3B2124
.3
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
6/1/73
6/1/74
3B2124
0.4
0.2
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
12
Recommended Actions
Dates
Program
Manpower Required
Situation Analysis
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
In itiation
Completion
El ement
(Prof.-
Man -
Mos.)
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS - RAPID CITY
Cooling water used on industrial O?
compressors. Potential increase of
dissolved salts.
1.
Develop standards to maintain or improve
water quality.
4/1/73
9/1/73
3B2124
2B1143
2B3149
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
2.
Letter of coranitment.
9/1/73
12/1/73
3B2124
0.3
3.
Monitor effluent to see if in compliance.
12/1/73
12/1/74
3B2124
0.5
0.2
3. 3(c) Grant
A Section 3(c) grant was awarded to the
BHCSD, October 1, 1970 for a three-
year period ending October 1 , 1973.
The project is designed to meet the
requirements of 18CFR601 for the Basin
plan. The grantee submitted a project
amendment proposal earlier this year.
This proposal has as its objective
development of methods to control
pollution from rural residential de-
velopments in a mountain environment.
Accepted by the grantee 7/12/72.
1.
2.
3.
Provide continuous Regional office monitoring
of project until its completion.
EIS preparation.
Utilize information developed by this grant
in other similar areas throughout the region.
Ongoing
9/1/73
10/1/73
10/1/73
2B1143
2B3149
2B2146
2B3150
2B6117
0.4
1.5
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.3
2.0
4. Surveillance & Monitorinq
(a) Field study was undertaken to de-
termine the location and composition
of buried tailings materials including
abandoned tailings piles along Whitewood
Creek, the Belle Fourche River, and the
Cheyenne R. An aerial reconnaissance
survey to establish locations of de-
posits and piles was completed on 2/1/72.
1.
Report to Conferees
Ongoing
11/72
3B1123
0.05
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
13
Recommended Actions
Dates
Program
Manpower Required
Situation Analysis
By Sub Task & Organization Rer.ponsibility
Initiation
Completion
El ement
(Prof.-
Kan -
Mos .)
.
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
Field sampling of instream deposits
and along-shore tailings was completed
7/1/72.
(b) Cooperative (EPA/State) well water
sampling program to document any impact
of waste discharges from the Homestake
Mining Company on ground water quality
(parameters-zinc, copper, mercury,
selenium, cyanide, and arsenic). The
quarterly sampling of approximately 20
wells is in the process of being com-
pleted.
1.
2/
Analytical work remaining should be completed.
Report to Conferees.
Ongoing
Ongoing
11/72
11/72
3B1123
3B1123
1.0
0.05
(c) Comprehensive one-year study of
mercury in the fish & bottom sediment
of the Cheyenne Arm of Oahe Reservoir.
A cooperative fish sampling program
between EPA/Food & Drug Administration/
Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife/
State was developed. Field sampling
was completed 9/29/72.
1.
2.
Complete analytical work and report to
Conferees.
Recommend restriction of fishing in reservoir
if necessary.
1/1/73
2/1/73
3B1123
3B1123
1 .75
0.05
(d) In accordance with Conference rec-
orrmendations , EPA has initiated weekly
monitoring of radiological and chemical
concentrations for: (1) the mouth of
Cottonwood Creek; (2) Cheyenne River
upstream at the U.S. Highway 18 bridge,
(3) Cheyenne River downstream at the
State Highway 71 bridge, and (4) Cotton-
wood Creek upstream from Mines Develop-
ment, Inc. Presently samples are col-
lected by Edgemont resident under con-
tract to EPA. Radiation analysis done
in Cincinnati. Reg1on VIII does other
chemistry.
1 .
2.
3.
Continue supervising field sampling and
providing analytical work.
Progress report to Conferees.
Unscheduled sampling that may be required.
Ongoing
Ongoi ng
Until State
gets capa-
bi 1 i ty.
11/72
3B1123
3B1123
3B1123
2.0
0.05
2.0
2.5
-------
TABLE III - IN JEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
14
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
Ini tiation
Completion
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
Information concerning public water
supplies, especially in regard to
treatment types and capacities, is
i nadequate.
1. Conduct inventory of all public water
supplies including information population
served, treatment, production and capacity.
11-72
6-73
2.0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
15
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
Initiation
Completion
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
5. Manpower Training
Inadequate O&M of municipal WWTP is
1. Support WWTP operator training programs
Cont
inuing
2B7160
0.2
0.5
0.5
in part due to lack of training of
in Wyoming"and South Dakota.
the operators. Provision of required
numbers, and levels of competance of
2. In-house manpower planning for WWTP.
Cont
inui ng
2B7160
0.3
0.3
0.3
operating personnel will require
manpower planning and training programs.
3. Work with Wyoming and South Dakota on
Cont
inuing
2B7160
0.2
0.3
0.3
All plants discussed previously will
development of manpower planning function.
benefit from these actions.
4. Work with State of Wyoming on development
Cont
i nuing
2B7160
0.1
0.2
0.2
of certification program.
5. Coordinate Field Study Training Program
Cont
inuing
2B7160
0.1
0.2
0.2
for WWTP operators.
6. Publlc Affairs
1. Coordinate closely with State agency infor-
1/1/73
Continui ng
5T2215
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
mation personnel, as well as those in the
The general public is not aware of
private sector who have an interest in en-
the many things that it may do to help
vironmental improvement to insure that infor-
abate water pollution. The purpose
mation efforts are coordinated in terms of
of this program element is to create
theme and purpose.
public awareness and support for
programs designed to abate and control
2. Utilize film documentaries and 60-second
7/1/73
Continuing
5T2215
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
pollution in the Cheyenne River Basin.
television spots to stress the need for
quality water for all intended uses.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
16
Situation Analysis
Recommended Actions
By Sub Task & Organization Responsibility
Dates
Inn tiati on|Completion
Program
Element
Manpower Required
(Prof.- Man - Mos.)
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
Public Affairs - Continued
7. 1971 Flood Response
During the night of June 9-10, 1972
disastrous floods caused intensive
damage and loss of life in Rapid City.
Lesser impacts occurred over a four
county area within the Cheyenne River
Basin. The Mountain-Plains Federal
Regional Council was assigned the
responsibility for coordinating inter-
mediate and long-term recovery efforts
of Federal agencies. As part of an
overall State-Federal management team a
Federal task force was given the pri-
mary responsibility of coordinating
Federal inputs and working with State
and local representatives. EPA is a
member of both the council and the task
force.
3. Publish articles in various publications.
4. Assist the BHCSD develop a slide-sound pro-
gram on water pollution problesm in the
basin and possible solution. This is in
accordance with requirements of the 3(c)
grant now underway.
1. Continue participation on Flood recovery
Task Force.
2. Coordinate EPA response with other major
programs in area, i.e. (1) other elements
of basin Accomplishment Plan; (2) 3(c) water
quality management planning study; (3) solid
waste management planning study; and (4)
Western South Dakota Enforcement Conference.
3. Augment 3(c) study to analyze wastewater
treatment needs identified by State and
local redevelopment council and to evaluate
flood recovery programs in terms of basin
wide water quality objectives.
1/1/73
1/1/73
Ongoing
Ongoi ng
Conti nuing
10/1/73
Indef i ni te
Indefi ni te
5T2215
5T2215
2B3149
2B3149
1.5
0.9
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.2
0.50
0.25
11/1/72
1/1/73
2B3150
0.1
-------
SECTION G
POINT SOURCE REDUCTIONS REQUIRED
-------
TABLE IV - WATER QUALITY IMPE^'i ::-KHT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITE'-iS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: LEAD-DEADWOOD SANITARY DISTRICT
"7 QUA LITT- PA RA METERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITEMS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(2h hr - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED
(7-day - 10 y-r flc
(SEE ..T?3 <: 'Z'-3LZ
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7U
FY^
t
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
K U5
—/
*0
B0D5
meet with BuRec to
1. discuss future, role and
planned activities.
1226#
251
Class B Stream \J
;ias
A
'u
TSS
2. complete memo agreement
with BuRec.
5,471,845#
5,4
0,8"
0 *¦
CN
3. complete plans and
speci fi cations
268#
I
26c
-
4 State and Federal
approval of plans and
speci fi cations
5. award contract
6. complete construction
'and place project in
nppratinn
7. monitor
8. 0 & M
1
)
JJ Class B stream is or
e that has no designate
water use and no st
andar
ds.
2/ Class A stream has <
esignated use and appro
iriate standards.
1
-------
TABLE IV - WATER QUALITY IMFP,' THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
IHDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE: : HILL CITY
' 7E7 QUALITY - PARAMETERS
ACCRECATEU ACTION IT!v-iS
REQUIRED TOR REDUCTION
present waste loads
(2h hr - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
(7-day - 10 y-r ."1c i
(SEE i/QS t, TA2LZ I III
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7U
TV
75
FY
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7U
FY
75
trv
T'S
bod5
1. complete construction
of wastewater facility
50#
35#
Water quality station not
avai1able.
TSS
2. monitor
28#
13#
3. 0 & M
1
j
i
|
-------
TABLE IV - WATEI1 QUALITY IMPRi Y..OT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: CUSTER, S.D.
QUALITY- PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACi'ION ITENJEi
REQUIRED TOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(2U hr - ave)
V.'ASTE LOADS INDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
Al'.TI'JIP.'.TZj
(7-day - 10
(SEE 'OS "
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE l)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7!+
FY
T5
77V
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
Ti
75
TV
"o
bod5
1. complete WWT facility
162#
90#
Water quality station not
avai1able.
TSS
2. monitor
114#
79#
3. 0 & M
1
i
!
s
1
.
-------
TABLE IV - WATER QUALITY THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITE'tS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE';: MTNFS nFVFI flPMFMT,. I NT. 0 Fdqpmont.
QUALITY-PARA.'CTErtS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITEMS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PHE3EKT 1,'AGTE LOADS
(2h hr - ave)
V/AST12 LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
AYflCIP.VJZJ '..A I —
(7-doy - 10 y-2-- flc
(SEE I. TA31E III'
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7^
FY
75
FY
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FT
7h
ri
75
FY
I7'5
Aci di ty
1. recommend to company to
seal ponds & stabilize
ni1ps .
Waste loads are fror
ssepaqe arc! not
readily mpRsurab 1 e.
l
Urani um-radi um
2. Follow up on Western
South Dakota Enforcement
Conference recommendatio
IS
iron-^anadium
Tailings
.
-------
TADLfi IV - WATER QUALITY TilROUGil CO^LETIOII 0? ACTION ITEXS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE: SOUTH DAKOTA CEMENT PLANT, Rapid City
;ter quality- parameters
ACJOHlXJATiiD ACITOK lV&iS
REQUIRE) FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT I //.GTE LOADS
(2h hr - ave)
Y.'ASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TA3LE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
Ai.TTCi^V'.'i'Ej ....
(7-e-,y - 10 ye?:- fic
(SEE i.T^S c: TAE^E m .
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE l)
FY
72
T?V
73
FY
7^
17V
75
tpv
r-. y
to
(See TABLE II)
7Y
72
TV
73
TV
7^
n
W
"6
bod5
recommend connection to
Rapid City sewer.
3 ft
3
30
<
130
TSS
19#
19
773
<
773
tds
257 ^
257
935
<
935
Fecal Coli
20,000/100
loc
COO
m 1 .
1 2,, 200/1 00 ml
<
]2,;
loo
:oo
mt .
I
1
1
-------
TAELT3 IV - WATTll QUALITY IMPtt ii'JMiv!? TliKOUCII CO^'r^TIOK OF ACTION ITE'-!S
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLu^T^ OF SOURCE: NISLAND
; ".'.,1 QUALITY-PAR/iMCT.^S
ACJCIKttJAMJ ACTION ITKMS
HElUIRi'D I'XJIi iWXiCTION
PiiiioiiK'i' W.'.^TU LOAD:.;
(2!t hr - avc)
l.'Ao'Li] LOADS RKDUUTION
(SJiii TA3LS III)
Pa!;SL'?:T MT&i QUALITY
a:.vi';ip.''.v: j
(7-cliy - 10 y—¦ :"ic
(SZ2 i.^,3 TA2LI III':
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE l)
FY
72
FY
73
I7V
7b
FY
75
7?V
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
- 1.
75 ! ' -5
bod5
1. Get city to apply for a
construction -grant.
26#
22#
Water quality monitoring
station not available.
TSS
2. award grant
22#
18#
3. complete construction
4. 0 & M
5. monitor
!
1
1
-------
?Anr,I3 IV - VA'KI! QUALITY ItfPR' : '.FJiT Tli;(OUGII C'O.'fl'LETIOW OF ACTION ITE'-S
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OP SOURClv: HOT SPRINGS
I"5. QUALITY-PARA:-3TEnS
AUGHtXJATL'D ACTION ITM-B
R^UIRiO) TOR REDUCTION
Pili&JKT UAJTii LOADS
(2^ nr - ave)
V/Alil'Ii LOADS HJiDUCTION PRESENT WATER QUALITY
(SEE TA3LS III)
a;.Yi'jiP.-'.VL^i '...u.
(7-doy - 10 yorr fic
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
lh
vv
75
FY
76
(See TABLE il)
FY
72
FY
7?
rr
7^
FY
75
"o
-
B0D5
1 ,N preappl ication meeting
117#
59
Water quality information
not avai1able.
TS3
2. apply for grant
ITS11
120
1
3. award grant
4. complete project
5. OtK
6.^ mom tor
!
i
i
i
i
\
j
i
!
!
i
-------
T/\nr,u iv - wAWii quauvy i:r,i«to?: or action i?:^
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: spearfish, s.d.
" '/R QUALIFY- PAR/CATERS
agchegated actio:-; items
REQUIRED TOR REDUCTION
PiiL'SEi.'T WASTE LOADS
{2k hr - avc)
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE l)
bod5
1. complete WWT facility
313#
TSS
I. monitor
250#
3. 0 & M
1
V/ASTE LOADS HlJDUC'i'IOK
(SEE TABLE III)
¦ PiiESEi'iT WATER QUALITY
7Y
12
Ti
73
250
187
7-;
TV
75
T?V
76
/w.TICIP.-.TYIj
(7-d-jy - 10 y-r fic
(SEE 'OS 1-. TA2LE III
(See TABLE IIJ
Water quality monitoring
stations non-existent
FY
72
TV
11
•T jf
7^
FY
75
-------
TABfiii IV - WA'i'I-Ki QUALITY IMP® j-jto TliiiOUGII COWLEVION OF ACTION ITIMS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: STURGIS. S.D.
. ,7 QUALX7Y- ?A aA*-j7TER3
AGGREGATED ACTION ITEMS 1 PRESENT UASTE LOADS
R33UIRED FOR REDUCTION j (2^ hr - avc)
V:A 3T L'l LOAijG Ki:DUCTIOri
(SEE TABLE III)
PIUSiiNT WA'C&i QUALITY
(7-day - 10 yon* fie
(SEE V.-n.S c- TA21E III'
(From TA3LE IIjl)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7h
FY
75
FY
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
fy
75
" 3
bod5
1. Improve 0 & M_ practices
67#
12#
Water quality station
non-exi stent.
TSS
2. monitor
91#
25#
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
i ! i
1
!
;
-------
TAHr,I2 IV - UATEi! QUALITY IWPR< THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITE'-K
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER 0? SOURCE?: ELLSWORTH AFB
: :? QUALITY-PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED AUTIOfi X'i'i-'.MS
REQUIRED TOR REDUCTION
PRESErJ'i.1 V/ASTE LOADS
(2^ hr - avc)
WASTE LOADS HINDUCTION PRESENT WATER QUALITY
(SEE TA3LE III)
a;,i'lciP.'.'J-Tj -P. .......
(7-diy - 10 y:rr flc-
(SEE i."Q3 c: TA31E III)
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY FY
72 173
FY
7U
T7V
75
fy
76
(See TABLE 11)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7^
Tl
: ~j
' 6
TOS
1. Effluent standards
335
1
200
935
<
.935
TSS
2. letter of commitments
28
72# j
111
<
773
I
3. monitor
i
1
i
1
1
1
i
1
I
j
i
1
i
I
-------
TABLE IV - WATEl) QUALITY IMPP.i >>'JTOT THROUGH COIfi'LETION OF ACTION ITE'-IS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE.':: SPEARFISH NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY
QUALITY ?AP\AM2TERS
AGG l\ LiGAVJ-D j\CTIOR 1 'i'H'IS
RHQUIR1ID FOR REDUCTION
PHESEUT WASTE LOADS
(2U hr - avo)
M3TE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
Ai.VICIP.\'JiLj '...U.
(7-diy - 10 y;r:- fie
(SEE "O.S c: TA2LE III)
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7H
TTV
T5
FY
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
7-2
FY
73
FY
7^
Tl
75
TTV
"0
bop5
1. develop effluept criteria
95#
85
No water quali ty
monitoring of th'is strearr
TSS
2. commitment letter to
maintain or reduce
present quality of efflue
it 329
319
3. monitor
1
1
i
I
1
I
-------
tame iv - i/ATF.it quality iM?&'^^jvT tkhoucii completion of action ite-.lS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE: KIESLING OIL CO. OSAGE, Wy.
: QUALITY-PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITil-IS
REQUIRED TOR REDUCTION
?i ¦! EOEr;T LOADS
(2't hr - avc)
hAST'J LOAOG REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
A'.VICir.'.TCj
(7-coy - 10 o-r:- fie
(SEE i.^.5 c: TA21E III'
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
71*
T7V
75
FY
76
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
73
FY
7^
<5 !7,3
TDS
1. develop effluent criteri
10#
10
No monitoring 'station
avai1able.
2. letter of commitment
3. monitor
.
1
1
!
1
-------
TADIiI! IV - WATKIi QUALITY :!-jWT TliHOu'Gil COm'LETIOK OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOURC13 OR CLUSTKU OF SOURCK: BIRDSALL SAND & GRAVEL, Rapid City
:cu.ALi?Y-?^rvV-2?T£ns
ACJCRIiCA'i'ED ACTION l'iV.i-lS
RH1UIRED FOR REDUCTION
PHUGiiivr waste loads
(2^ hr - ave)
WA15TU LOADS HJiDUCTIOIi
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WA'L'lJR QUALITY
(7-day - 10 yorr fie
(SZl. i.^.S o. TA21S
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7h
vv
75
FY
To
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
T"/
7^
FY
75
FY
~'3
bod5
1. develop effluent criteria
11#
1
30
<
SO
TSS
2. letter of commitment
o ,2k2
5,14
773
<
'73
IDS
3. Mom tor
781#
20C
935
<
235
1 !
!
j
!
-------
TAfiLIC IV - WATi-il QUALITY T/.?R' >**.' : THROUGH COMi'LliTIOI'I OF ACTION XT1K5
INDIVIDUAL EOURCli: OR CLUSTER OF SOURCE.1:: DAKOTA BLOCK CO., Rapid City
" "1 OUALI7Y-PATvu-STSRS
AGGRiiGAYKD ACTION ITivS
RSiUIRtD TOR REDUCTION
wa^ts LOADS
(2U hr - ave)
V.'AliT:': LOADS lil^JUCTlON • PRiiSiiNT WATCR;QUALITY
(SKE TA13LS III)
(7-eoy - 10 yc-y." fie
(S2C 'o.s I. ta:le in
(From TABLE III)
(See TA2LF i)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7^
FY
75
FY
76
(See TABLE 11)
Ti
72
FY
75
n
7^
FY
75
Ti.
TDS
1. develop effluent criteria
6#
i
6//
935
<
935
2. commitment letter to
maintain or reduce amount
U T [Jul 1 U IdM Lb
3. monitor
1
;
1
1
1
| 1
! j
i
!
I
1
1
1
i
1
|
I
1
-------
TABLE IV - UATKlt QUALTVY IMPRhi':
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLU3TEU OF SOURCE:':
QUALITY- PATvV-lLTERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITEMS
R31UIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESEr.T '.JAijl'lj LOADS
(2't hr - ave)
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE i)
TDS
1. deve-lop effluent criteri
¦ Qo
00
00
1
1
2. letter of commitment
to not degrade w.g.
3. monitor
]
¦J'M'r TllliOu'CII COMi'LKTION OF ACTION IT1M5
: PETE LIEN S SONS, INC. Rapid City
vjastlO loads hinduction present waver Quality
(SEE TABLE III)
AM'ICI?.'.TJJ
(7-day - 10 y:-- flc*.
(SEE i.TJS <. TA2EZ
FY
72
T7V
73
FY
7;i
FY
75
FY
76
( See TABLE' II).
FY
72
FY
~3
i* 1:5
T~/
„ y
'
<
335
r
1
|
1
1
!
i
-------
i'Anr.3 iv - w:va cijhTj-a 3-wr viiiioucn c,o:-n>r.E,:io>J of .•\ctiok ite'-w
11'IDIVID'JAL SOURCK OR CL'u'STEli OF SOURCE: AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS
0Li ALI7Y - ?ARAMETTERS
ACC.KUJ/Yi'oD ACTIOK l'i'LiMS
R27UIRI£> FOR REDUCTION
v/.'lJt1: ioaps
(2't hr - avc)
V/ASTii LOADS HUDUC'i'IOU
(SSiS TABLE III)
PHiisiirrr v,'atl;> q-jality
(7-day - 10 ye-- fie
(sis i.os c- ta:-le hi
(From TABLE III)
( See TA3l,E I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
TU
75
FY
76
(See TABLE. II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7^
: 5 l-'5
TDS
1. develop effluent standard
; 28#
1
28
935
------- |