MBMG 99
OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF
GROUND WATER IN MONTANA
VOLUME 1
THE GREAT PLAINS REGION
by
Roger A. Noble, Robert N. Bergantino, Thomas W. Patton,
Brenda Sholes, Faith Daniel and Judeykay Schofield
1982

-------
n«"*
This report on characteristics of aquifers in Montana is a two-volume
study; Volume I has been compiled for the Great Plains physiographic province
and Volume II for the Rocky Mountains physiographic province of Montana. The
division into two volumes was necessary in order to facilitate descriptions of
the various aquifers that occur in these two distinct topographic and structural
provinces. This report contains descriptions of thickness, potentiometric
surface, structural configuration and water-quality data for the major aquifers
within each province.
These two volumes contain a compilation of existing hydrogeologic informa-
tion for the State. Because statewide hydrogeologic investigations have only
recently begun in Montana, there are many data gaps, especially for the deeper
aquifers, and consequently some information is still conjectural. Demands on
Montana's ground water are expanding because of increasing energy development
and agricultural requirements (especially irrigation). For new developments,
ground water is the only alternative left, as most of Montana's surface waters
are already over-appropriated.
Montana is currently quantifying its water use and consumption through a
water-right adjudication program. This program is being implemented by the
Department of Natural Resources and Conservation through Senate Bill No. 76.
The completion date for the adjudication program is April 30, 1982; therefore,
quantitative statistics for Montana's ground-water use will not be available
until after this date. The ground-water use section is thus based on estimates
of current trends.
This study on aquifer characteristics in Montana was .funded by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency through Contract No. GO-082-908-10, for the
PREFACE
"R 0
o
005 s"
\M
ii

-------
Underground Injection Control Program. The U.S. Congress enacted the Safe
Drinking Water Act (Public Law 93-523) for the purpose of protecting under-
ground sources of water from contamination caused by well injection. This
act mandated the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to establish the Under-
ground Injection Control Program for the purpose of preventing underground
injections that endanger ground-water resources. The Montana Bureau of Mines
and Geology's role in the Underground Injection Control Program is to identify
and characterize the aquifers in the State of Montana.
iii

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER	Page
PREFACE	ii
GENERAL STATEMENT 		1
Purpose and Scope 		1
Description of Montana 		1
Previous Investigations and
Sources of Information 		5
I.	INTRODUCTION TO THE GREAT PLAINS REGION 		6
Physiography 		6
Topography 		6
Surface Drainage 		7
Climate 		8
Cultural Geography 		11
Population	11
Land Use and Ownership	17
Geology	18
Stratigraphy 		18
Structure	19
II.	HYDROGEOLOGY BY AQUIFERS	23
Quaternary Unconsolidated Deposits 		23
Early Tertiary Fort Union Aquifer			26
Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers 		28
Judith River Aquifer 		29
Eagle Aquifer	31
Kootenai Aquifer 		32
Swift Aquifer	33
Madison Group 		34
III.	GROUND-WATER USE	36
Municipal and Domestic 		38
Agriculture	40
Irrigation	40
Livestock	41
Industry	41

-------
CHAPTER
Page
IV.	WATER QUALITY	43
Data Sources	43
General Water Quality 		44
Quaternary and Late Tertiary
Unconsolidated Deposits 		45
Fort Union and Wasatch Aquifers 		48
Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers 		50
Judith River Aquifer 		51
Eagle (Virgelle) Aquifer 		54
Kootenai Aquifer 		55
Jurassic Aquifers 		57
Mississippian Aquifers 		60
V.	SUMMARY 			68
VI.	REFERENCES CITED 		75
APPENDIX A: Well-numbering system 		76
APPENDIX B: Glossary of terms	78
APPENDIX C: Montana Water Law	81
APPENDIX D: Printout of injection wells
(available upon request)
APPENDIX E: Printout of water quality analyses
(available upon request)

-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE	PAGE
1-1 Drainage area in Montana	1
1-2 River basin inflow and outflow 		8
1-3 Population of counties and county subdivisions 		12-15
1-4 Well use by county	37
1-5 Comparison of selected elements and ions in waters .... 63-65

-------
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE	PAGE
1-1 Major drainage basins 		4
1-2 Mean annual runoff of major streams 	 9
1-3 County census subdivisions 		16
1-4 Stratigraphic column 		20
1-5 Tectonic map	21
1-6 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from Quaternary unconsolidated deposits ... 46
1-7 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from early Tertiary Fort Union aquifers ... 49
1-8 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from the Fox Hills-Hell Creek aquifers ... 52
1-9 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from the Judith River aquifer	53
1-10 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from the Eagle aquifer	56
1-11 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from the Kootenai aquifer	58
1-12 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from Jurassic aquifers 	 59
1-13 Frequency of occurrence compared to dissolved solids
in water from Mississippian aquifers 	 62
1-14 Diagram showing well-numbering system 	 77

-------
LIST OF PLATES
Plate


TF
211.11
E
Hell Creek-Fox Hills Aquifers
TF
211.29
E-W
Judith River Aquifer
TF
211.41
E-W
Eagle-Aquifer
TF
217.70
E-W
Kootenai Aquifer
TF
221.47
E-W
Swift Aquifer
TF
331.60
E-W
Madison Group
AT
211.07
E
Hell Creek Aquifer
AT
211.13
E
Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers
AT
211.21
E
Bearpaw Shale
AT
211.29
E-W
Judith River Aquifer
AT
211.39
E-W
Eagle Aquifer
AT
217.32
E-W
Basal Colorado Sandstone
AT
217.70
E-W
Kootenai Aquifer
AT
221.47
E-W
Swift Aquifer
AT
331.60
E-W
Madison Group
DS
100.10
E
Quaternary Unconsolidated Deposits
DS
125.50
E
Fort Union Aquifer
DS
211.11
E
Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers
DS
211.29
E-W
Judith River Aquifer
DS
211.39
E-W
Eagle Aquifer
DS
217.70
E-W
Kootenai Aquifer
DS
220.50
E-W
Jurassic Aquifer
DS
331.60
E-W
Madison Group
PS
331.60
E
Madison Group
Legend
TF - Thickness of formation
AT - Altitude of formation
DS - Dissolved solids
PS - Potentiometric surface
211.11 - Formation code
E - Eastern half of Montana's 1:500,000 scale map
W - Western half of Montana's 1:500,000 scale map
AVAILABLE AT CURRENT
COPYING RATES

-------
GENERAL STATEMENT
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report was prepared by the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology in
order for the State of Montana to comply with Federal requirements relating
to the Underground Injection Control Program. Existing hydrogeologic data
were used for the aquifer characterization maps and the descriptive narrative.
The aquifer characterization maps depict: (1) the areal and subareal extent;
(2) surface configuration; (3) thickness; (A) potentiometric surface; and
(5) water chemistry expressed as dissolved solids for the major aquifers in
Montana. The narrative describes the lithology, general hydrogeologic parameters
and potential well yields for individual aquifers. The inventory of injection
wells was compiled from information obtained from the Montana Oil and Gas
Commission. The inventory provides a listing of injection wells with locations,
owners, affected aquifers and injection rates. The report also contains a
section delineating well use by county. While broad in scope, this report is
designed to meet the needs of Federal regulatory agencies responsible for
writing and implementing regulations for underground injection.
DESCRIPTION OF MONTANA
Montana, the third largest state of the 48 contiguous United States, is
vast and diverse. It has an area of 147,138 square miles and a population of
786,690 (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1980); the average population density is
5.4 people per square mile. Most Montanans live in the major cities that are
geographically dispersed throughout the state. These cities are supported by
the surrounding rural communities. Although Montana is sparsely populated, it
- 1 -

-------
is rich in natural resources and is a prime producer of agricultural staples
for the nation. Montana's abundant natural resources include fossil fuels,
minerals, timber and water. These resources, however, are either fully appro-
priated or are being exploited rapidly.
In 1980, Montana's low-sulfur coal reserves were estimated to be in excess
of 120 billion tons (U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1976). Many coal deposits of the
Fort Union Formation are easily accessible through strip-mining procedures and
supply a substantial part of needed energy for the nation. Total coal production
for 1980 was 29,905,627 tons (Cole and others, 1981), of which 90 percent was
exported to other states. Montana also has projected oil reserves of 248
trillion barrels, an undetermined reserve of natural gas and unknown potential
for uranium resources (Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation,
1980).
Montana's mineral resources are of great economic importance to the State.
Montana ranks among the top five states in the production of antimony, silver,
copper, talc, vermiculite and bentonite (U.S. Department of Interior, 1979).
In addition to these commodities, Montana has significant deposits of lead,
zinc, tungsten, chromium, manganese, nickel, titanium, vanadium, platinum-group
metals, molybdenum, arsenic, iron, antimony, thorium and other rare earths.
Metallic and nonmetallic exploration activity in the State is increasing every
year.
Most of western Montana is heavily forested, and most of these forests lie
within designated state and national forests or parks. Timber harvesting occurs
on selected tracts within these forests and on privately owned land. The
volume of timber harvested in Montana from 1976 to present (1982) has decreased
because high mortgage rates have substantially reduced the number of new ,
- 2 -

-------
buildings being constructed.
Montana's water, both from ground-water reserves and surface-water flow,
is one of the State's most valuable resources, because it is vital to agricul-
ture, mining and power production. More than 43 million acre-feet of water
flow from the State each year; 65 percent of it originates in Montana (Montana
Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, 1976). Three major river
basins—the Columbia, Upper Missouri and Yellowstone—account for 97 percent of
this flow. Statistics concerning the drainage areas of the major river basins
are presented in Table 1-1, with the major drainage basins displayed in Figure 1-1.
TABLE 1-1
DRAINAGE AREA IN MONTANA
River basin
Area
(sq.
mi.
Percentage of
Montana's area
Percentage of
Montana's water
Columbia
Upper Missouri
Yellowstone
Little Missouri
St. Mary
25,152
82,352
35,890
3,428
648
147,470
17%
56%
24%
2%
	1%
100%
59%
17%
21%
1%
2%
100%
Of the 15 million acres of cropland in production in the State, 12.5
million acres are dryland and the remainder are irrigated. Montana's major
water use is the irrigation of these 2.5 million acres of cropland from both
surface-water and ground-water diversions. Agricultural demands, hydroelectric
generating facilities and instream-flow reservations have already claimed most
of the surface water. This surface-water demand has resulted in over-appropria-
tion of these waters, placing additional demands on ground-water resources.
- 3 -

-------
MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS
FIGURE 1-1

-------
Sources of potable ground water in certain areas are now limited.
For the purpose of this report, the State has been divided into the Rocky
Mountains region and the Great Plains region. Because geology, climate and
aquifer characteristics of the Great Plains region are significantly different
from those of the Rocky Mountains region, this natural physiographic division
was used to facilitate the aquifer descriptions in this report. The line sep-
arating the two divisions is not precisely the same as that used by geographers,
because it follows the eastern edge of rocks that were severely disturbed by
the Laramide orogeny rather than the actual mountain front, except where the
two coincide. The following is a compilation of data for each of the major
aquifers of the Great Plains region.
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION
The collection of data for this report was made possible by the cooperation
of the U.S. Geological Survey, especially Richard D. Feltis and William R.
Hotchkiss, who furnished essential information on particular aquifer units.
Other data were compiled from oil-well logs of the Montana Oil and Gas Commission,
various Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology and U.S. Geological Survey publica-
tions, numerous theses and dissertations and unpublished information generated
from water-well logs and records.
Water-quality data in this report were obtained from Montana Bureau of
Mines and Geology files. Additional analyses were collected from the U.S.
Geological Survey.
- 5 -

-------
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE GREAT PLAINS REGION
The Great Plains region of Montana extends from the eastern base of the
Rocky Mountains between 45° and 49° north latitude to Montana's eastern border.
Nearly two-thirds of the State's 147,138 square miles lie within this region.
Along the western edge of the Great Plains is a zone, as much as 25 miles wide,
that was tectonically disturbed during the formation of the Rocky Mountains.
Although mountains did not develop in this zone, the structure is generally so
complex that meaningful structural contour, isopach or potentiometric surface
maps could not be produced. For this reason the Disturbed Belt has been in-
cluded with the Rocky Mountains region in Volume II of this report, and the
western edge of the Great Plains region thus begins at the eastern edge of the
Disturbed Belt for this discussion.
Agricultural trade, based on livestock and grain production, is the main
economy of the region. Industry and retail marketing, however, are expanding
in importance. Oil-well drilling and coal-mining operations have grown rapidly
since 1974 when the need to develop additional domestic energy resources was
recognized. These operations are adding significant strength to the economic
base for the region, but are placing additional demands on the ground-water
resources of the region.
PHYSIOGRAPHY
Topography
The Great Plains region comprises almost two-thirds of Montana (roughly
92,400 square miles) east of the Disturbed Belt. This region is underlain by
flat to gently dipping sedimentary rocks. The rocks that form the surface are
- 6 -

-------
generally quite soft and have been eroded into open, rolling plains. Near some
of the major rivers and in areas of recent drainage changes, however, the plains
have been sharply dissected into badlands and isolated, flat-topped buttes.
Near the western edge of the plains, especially in central Montana, igneous
intrusions and extrusions have formed minor mountain ranges such as the Sweet-
grass Hills, the Bearpaw Mountains, the Little Rocky Mountains, the Big Snowy
Mountains, the Bighorn Mountains and the Pryor Mountains. Although many of
these folded mountains are high and rugged, they generally are not severely
disturbed by faulting as are rocks in the Disturbed Belt. Because useful
structural contour, isopach and potentiometric surface maps can be made up to
the bases of these mountains, they are included in the Great Plains region.
Altitudes within the area designated as the Great Plains region range from
1,864 feet above sea level at the Montana-North Dakota border where the Missouri
River flows out of the State, to 11,214 feet above sea level at the summit of
Crazy Peak in the Crazy Mountains.
Surface drainage
The upper Missouri River, the Yellowstone River and the Little Missouri
River comprise the major drainage systems of Montana's Great Plains region. The
upper Missouri River basin is the largest river basin in the State. It contains
approximately 56 percent of the land area, yet it discharges only 17 percent of
the water that annually leaves the State. Within the upper Missouri basin, there
are 38 reservoirs that have storage capacities of 5,000 acre-feet or more. Fort
Peck reservoir on the main stem of the Missouri River is the largest of these,
having a storage capacity of 19,410,000 acre-feet. The net reservoir storage
for the basin is greater than 25,000,000 acre-feet.
- 7 -

-------
The Yellowstone River basin in Montana includes 24 percent of the State's
area and annually discharges 21 percent of Montana's surface water. Yellowtail
reservoir (1,375,000 acre-feet) is the largest of seven reservoirs that have a
storage capacity of 5,000 acre-feet or more.
River-basin inflow and outflow figures for drainages in the Great Plains
region of Montana are presented in Table 1-2. The mean annual runoff of the
major streams for this region is represented schematically in Figure 1-2.
TABLE 1-2
RIVER BASIN INFLOW AND OUTFLOW (IN ACRE-FEET/YEAR)
Drainage Inflow Originating Leaving the Percentage origin-
		in the region region	ating in the region
Upper Missouri	4,513,000 3,420,000	7,933,000	43
Yellowstone	2,734,000 6,786,000	9,520,000	71
Little Missouri	55,930	132,500	101,430	70
Climate
Warm-to-hot summers, cold winters and scant precipitation characterize the
Great Plains region of Montana. In the Koppen system, the climate of the area
is classed as "steppe" (BSk). In the Thorntwaite system, the plains are classed
as "semiarid, microthermal, precipitation deficiency in all seasons" (DC'd).
Because Thorntwaite's map is more detailed than most regional climate maps,
additional climate zones are shown within the region. The mountains (based on
the data available at the time of compilation) are shown as "subhumid, micro-
thermal, precipitation deficiency in all seasons" (CC'd). Had the data been
available, an additional class would have been added for the eastern outliers
of the Rocky Mountains and classified as "subhumid, microthermal, adequate
- 8 -

-------
Scale
30	40	6Q	so m.I*.
I
VO
I SOURCE"
U.3 0 S Wot«r R»tourc«> Data For Montana Port I, 1969
Ecflh Stitnc** D«portcB«nt, Montono 8 to fa U«l»#r«itj
figure 1-2
MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF OF MAJOR STREAMS
Width of stream line corresponds to top width of channel. Mean annual discharge, in
thousands of cubic feet per second, is represented by channel cross section.
~5\

-------
precipitation in all seasons" (CC'r). Also, on the1summit of the Crazy
Mountains, additional classes of "humid, microthermal, precipitation adequate
in all seasons" (BC'r) and "taiga" (D') would be shown. In the Bighorn basin,
Thorntwaite shows a small area where the climate is "arid, microthermal, precip-
itation deficiency in all seasons" (EC'd).
The warmest average July temperatures occur along the Yellowstone and
Powder rivers where July maximum temperatures exceed 90°F. The coldest average
January temperatures occur in extreme northeastern Montana where average
January minimums are approximately 0°F. The difference in temperature between
the average monthly maximum and the average monthly minimum is about 80°F
Average temperatures moderate toward the western edge of the Great Plains. The
summers are cooler because of the altitude, and the winters are warmer because
of the proximity of Pacific air masses and because of the occurrence of chinook
(foehn) winds.
Although precipitation averages about 14 inches per year throughout the
plains region, amounts as low as 8 inches per year occur in some of the low-
lying valleys and in the rainshadows of mountains, and amounts as much as 18
inches per year (enough to support the growth of coniferous trees) occur on
some of the higher hills and plateaus. Most of the isolated mountain ranges
receive more than 20 inches of precipitation per year, thereby supporting
abundant conifers. Precipitation amounts of as much as 40 inches per year occur
on the summits of the Big Snowy, Little Belt and Bighorn mountains, and 60 inches
per year fall on the summit of the Crazy Mountains. Spring is the main season
of ground-water recharge, because this is usually the only time when there is
a surplus of precipitation, cool weather and little evapotranspiration.
Snowfall is scant over most of the Montana plains; the average is about
- 10 -

-------
40 inches per year. The average annual snowfall increases from east to west.
At the eastern border of the State, the average is about 30 inches per year, but
at the western edge of the plains, the average annual snowfall is about 50 inches
per year. The summits of the isolated mountain ranges of the plains receive
much more snowfall than the lower-lying plains : 100-200 inches per year on the
Little Rocky, Judith and Moccasin mountains; 200-300 inches per year on the
Bearpaw, Highwood and Bighorn mountains; and 300-500 inches per year on the Big
Snowy and Little Belt mountains and Crazy mountains. The moisture content of
a deep snowpack on these mountains helps assure abundant surface water during
warm, dry summers.
CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY
Population
Most of the Great Plains region is sparsely populated. The 1980 census
showed 393,063 persons living in this region. The average population density
of the region is 4.25 persons per square mile. Approximately 40 percent of
these people reside in five cities of over 7,000 population: Billings, Great
Falls, Miles City, Havre and Lewistown. The population distribution is sum-
marized in Table 1-3, with the county census subdivisions represented in
Figure 1-3.
The largest city of the Montana plains region is Billings, with a population
of 66,798 in 1980. Nearby subdivisions and towns raise the population of the
Billings marketing area to nearly double that figure. Billings is a home base
for most of the coal- and oil-exploration activity in the Powder River and
Williston basins, and is also a hub for livestock processing for south-central
and southeastern Montana.
- 11 -

-------
TABLE 1-3
POPULATION OF COUNTIES AND COUNTY SUBDIVISIONS
OF THE GREAT PLAINS REGION, MONTANA
County/County Subdivision
1980
1970
% Change
Big Horn County
Crow Reservation Division
Hardin Division
Northern Cheyenne Division
Tongue River Division
11,096
5,645
4,249
1,013
189
10,057
10.3
Blaine County
Chinook Division
Fort Belknap Division
Harlem Division
6,999
3,172
1,854
1.973
6,727
3,263
1,312
4.0
- 2.8
41.3
Carbon County
Carbon East Division
Fromberg-Bridger Division
Joliet Division
Red Lodge Division
Roberts Division
8,099
658
1,753
1,782
3,082
824
7,080
1,613
1,384
753
14.4
8.7
28.8
9.4
Carter County
Ekalaka Division
Little Missouri Division
1,799
1,100
699
1,956
1,135
821
-	8.0
-	3.1
-14.9
Cascade County
Belt Division
Cascade Division
Eden-Stockett Division
Great Falls Division
Great Falls North Division
Monarch-Neihart Division
80,696
1,626
1,559
862
70,600
2,514
277
81,804
1,406
1,354
866
260
-	1.4
15.6
15.1
-	0.5
6.5
Choteau County
Big Sandy Division
Fort Benton Division
Geraldine Division
6,092
9.998
2,866
1,228
6,473
2,127
3,066
5.9
6.1
6.5
Custer County
Miles City Division
Mizpah-Pumpkin Division
North Custer Division
Shirley-Ismay Division
13,109
11,846
511
383
369
12,174
7.7
- 12 -

-------
TABLE 1-3
(CONTINUED)
County/County Subdivision	1980	1970	% Change
Daniels County
2,835
3,083
- 8.0
Daniels North Division
2,709
	
	
Fort Peck Division
126
	
	
Dawson County
11,805
11,269
4.8
Dawson North Division
1,552
	
	
Glendive Division
10,253
	
	
Fallon County
3,763
4,050
- 7.1
Baker Division
3,235
3,471
- 6.8
Plevna Division
528
579
- 8.8
Fergus County
13,076
12,611
3.7
Denton Division
820
977
-16.1
Grass Range Division
617
721
-14.4
Hanover Division
765
899
-14.9
Lewistown Division
10,046
	
	
Roy Division
405
437
- 7.3
Winifred Division
423
492
-14.0
Garfield County
1,656
1,796
- 7.8
North Garfield Division
1,204
1,309
- 8.0
South Garfield Division
452
487
- 7.2
Glacier County
10,628
10,783
- 1.4
Cut Bank Division
4,540
	
	
Golden Valley County
1,026
931
10.2
Lavina Division
438
	
	
Ryegate Division
588
	
——
Hill County
17,985
17,358
3.6
Gildford Division
910
	
	
Havre Division
13,738
	
	
Rocky Boy Division
1,778
	
	
Rudyard Division
998
	
	
Wild Horse Lake Division
561
	
	
Judith Basin County
2,646
2,667
- 0.8
Geyser Division
542
644
-15.8
Hobson Division
920
960
- 4.2
Stanford Division
1,184
1,063
11.4
Liberty County
2,329
2,359
- 1.3
Chester Division
1,839
1,851
- 0.6
Joplin Division
490
508
- 3.5

- 13 -



-------
TABLE 1-3
(CONTINUED)
County/County Subdivision	1980	1970	% Change
McCone County	2,702	2,875	- 6.0
Circle Division	1,766 			
North McCone Division	936 			
Musselshell County	4,428	3,734	18.6
Klein Division	988	411	140.4
Melstone Division	656	623	5.3
Roundup Division	2,784 			
Petroleum County	655	675	- 3.0
Winnett North Division	189	457	-58.6
Winnett South Division	466	218	113.8
Phillips County	5,367	5,386	- 0.4
Belknap Division	206 			
Malta Division	4,242 			
Phillips South Division	390 			
Whitewater Division	529	—;- 	
Pondera County	6,731	6,611	1.8
Blackfeet East Division	148 			
Conrad Division	4,522 			
Valier-Dupuyer Division	1,588	2,080	-23.7
Powder River County	2,520	2,862	-11.9
Broadus Division	1,321	1,442	- 8.4
East Powder River Division	725	928	-21.9
Otter Division	474 			
Prairie County	1,836	1,752	4.8
Terry North Division	270	259	4.2
Terry South Division	1,566	1,493	4.9
Richland County	12,243	9,837	24.5
Fairview Division	2,267 			
Lambert Division	753 			
Savage-Crane Division	1,341 			
Sidney Division	7,882 			
Roosevelt County	10,467	10,365	1.0
East Roosevelt Division	2,134 			
Fort Peck Division	8,333 			
Rosebud County	9,899	6,032	64.1
Ashland Division	564 			
Forsyth Division	3,516 			
Northern Cheyenne Division	2,651 			
Rosebud Division	3,168 			
- 14 -

-------
TABLE 1-3
(CONTINUED)
County/County Subdivision	1980	1970	% Change
Sheridan County
5,414
5,779
- 6.3
Fort Peck Division
179
	
	
Medicine Lake Division
1,040
	
	
Plentywood Division
3,562
	
	
Westby Division
633
721
-12.2
Stillwater County
5,598
4,632
20.9
Columbus Division
2,387
	
	
Park City Division
1,223
822
48.8
Stillwater North Division
581
	
	
Sweet Grass County
3,216
2,980
7.9
North of Yellowstone Division
675
678
- 0.4
South of Yellowstone Division
2,541
2,302
10.4
Teton County
6,491
6,116
6.1
Choteau Division
3,481
	
	
Dutton-Power Division
1,198
1,298
- 7.7
Fairfield Division
1,812
1,719
5.4
Treasure County
981
1,049
- 8.2
North Treasure Division
288
427
-32.6
South Treasure Division
693
642
7.9
Valley County
10,250
11,471
-10.6
Fort Peck Reservation Division
1,283
	
	
Glasgow Division
6,636
	
	
Wheatland County
2,359
2,529
- 6.7
Harlowton Division
1,821
	
	
Judith Gap-Shawmut Division
538
	
	
Wibaux County
1,476
1,465
0.8
Pine Hills-St. Phillips Division
347
459
-24.4
Wibaux Division
1,129
1,006
12.2
Yellowstone County
108,035
87,367
23.7
Billings Division
86,493
	
	
Buffalo Creek Division
191
156
22.4
Huntley Project Division
2,905
2,179
33.3
Laurel Division
10,086
	
	
Northwest Yellowstone Division
1,669
	
	
Shepherd Division
2,550
1,226
108.0
South Yellowstone Division
4,141
1,320
213.7
Yellowstone National Park Division 275
64
329.7
- 15 -

-------
COUNTY CENSUS SUBDIVISIONS

-------
Great Falls, in north-central Montana, closely follows Billings, with a
population of 56,725, and is supported by surrounding subdivisions that double
its population. Great Falls is primarily a marketing outlet for grain and
livestock production. The city also is the site for operations of Malmstrom
Air Force Base, which contributes to the economy of the area.
Although the population of the Great Plains region of Montana has increased
by only 3.7 percent from 1970 to 1980, the population of Richland and Rosebud
counties has increased 24.5 and 64.1 percent, respectively. The population
growth in these counties can be attributed dominantly to oil exploration in
Richland County and strip mining of coal in Rosebud County. This rapid growth
usually produces a "boom" for the area and increases construction activity.
Land use and ownership
Roughly 60 percent of Montana's Great Plains region is used as pasture and
range for livestock grazing (this includes the open woodland areas used as
summer pasture as well as for timber operation). Twenty-five percent of the
pasture and less than 1 percent of the range are irrigated. The Great Plains
region has 13,138,066 acres that are classified as cropland, accounting for 22
percent of the land use in the region. According to the 1974 Census of
Agriculture, 54 percent of those 13,138,066 acres is classified as harvested,
and 5 percent is used as pasture (not included in the above class). Other
activities such as mining and petroleum operations, human habitations and
recreational areas account for the small remainder of land use.
About 60 percent of the Great Plains region of Montana is privately owned,
but State and Federal agencies administer large portions of certain counties.
The federally administered lands include game ranges, national forests, Indian
- 17 -

-------
reservations and lands that were either never homesteaded or were withdrawn
from homesteading at a later time. The State-owned lands include two sections
(school sections) out of nearly every township and school sections that were
traded out of Indian reservations, national forests, etc. The State land is
administered by the Department of State Lands, whereas Federal land dominantly
falls under the jurisdiction of either the Bureau of Land Management or the
U.S. Forest Service.
GEOLOGY
Stratigraphy
Sedimentary rocks of all geologic ages, from Precambrian to Quaternary,
underlie parts of the Great Plains region of Montana. The seas that repeatedly
covered Montana in the geologic past were comparatively shallow, but gradual
subsidence of the region allowed a great thickness of sediments to accumulate.
The thickness of sedimentary rock over Precambrian crystalline basement ranges
from 4,000 feet along the Sweetgrass Arch in west-central Montana to 15,000
feet in the Montana portion of the Williston basin.
The Precambrian sedimentary rocks are predominantly quartzite and argillite,
belonging to the Belt Group. The Paleozoic sedimentary rocks are mainly lime-
stone and dolomite, but shale is abundant also. Many of the Paleozoic units,
especially the Madison Group, are targets for oil exploration in the Big Horn
and Powder River basins and along the Sweetgrass Arch of the Great Plains region.
The Madison Group is also one of the most productive deep aquifers in eastern
Montana. Mesozoic sedimentary rocks are dominantly shale, but there are also
several sandstone units of great areal extent that are generally good aquifers.
The Fort Union Formation and Wasatch Formation are Cenozoic sedimentary
- 18 -

-------
units that contain abundant coal. Other important Cenozoic sedimentary forma-
tions are the Flaxville gravel, glacial deposits and alluvium. Almost all of
the Cenozoic formations are used for water supplies because they are at or near
the surface. Glacial deposits sometimes yield as little as 2 gallons per minute
(gpm), whereas alluvium may yield more than 1,000 gpm. The various stratigraphic
units and their time relationship are shown in Figure 1-4.
Structure
Most of the Great Plains region of Montana is underlain by sedimentary
rocks that have eastward dips, usually less than 5°. Reversals of this dip
occur only in open anticlines, synclines and domes. Near the mountains and
adjacent to the Porcupine Dome and the western flank of the Cedar Creek anti-
cline J dips exceed 30° for a few miles. The major structural features of the
Montana plains are shown in Figure 1-5.
The plains region has not undergone appreciable deformation since the end
of the Laramide in Eocene times. Small-scale, open folds occur in Oligocene
and Miocene formations of southeastern Montana. This deformation may be
evidence of small-scale compression or tectonism since these sediments were
deposited. Epeirogenic uplift of 1,500 feet has occurred in extreme eastern
Montana, and 4,000 feet of uplift has occurred near the Rocky Mountains. This
uplift is thought to have occurred since mid- or late-Pliocene, and may have
been accompanied by regional tectonic deformation.
There have been few recorded seismic events in eastern Montana since the
days of organized records in 1805. The absence of seismic events, however, does
not necessarily imply tectonic quiescence. A fault zone extending from Froid,
in northeastern Montana, through Brockton, on the Missouri River, to south of
- 19 -

-------
22x
5
22.5
37
55
635
141
195
230
280
310
345
395
435
500
570
900
1400
Pliocene
QUATERNARY
Colorado Group
Quadrant, Tensleep
Amsden
Big Snowy Group
Wasatch
Fort Union Formation
Hell Croek Fox Hills
Bearpaw
Judith River
Claggett
Eagle
Telegraph Creek
• Basin-filt Deposits
Montana Group
Ellis Group (Swift, Rierdon, Sawtooth!
Madison Group (Charles, Mission Canyon, Lodgepote)
Red River, Winnipeg
Bighorn
Pilgnm
Meagher
Wolsey
Flathead
[\\NNN] Periods of non-deposition or erosion.
Belt Group
Figure 1—4
- 20 -

-------
I
N>
LEGEND
MAJOR FOLD TRENDS
NORMAL FAULT
HIGH-ANGLE REVERSE FAULT
SHOWING DIP
STRUCTURE CONTOURS ON BASE
OF COLORADO SHALE
25	0	25	50	75	IOO MILES
I .... 1	I	I	1	1
TECTONIC MAP OF THE GREAT PLAINS REGION
FIGURE 1-5

-------
Weldon in McCone County (a distance of more than 100 miles) seems to have had
displacement of several tens of feet since the Wisconsin glaciation. The
recency of this faulting is suggested by the glacial deposits preserved in the
central graben of the fault but eroded from its flanks.
- 22 -

-------
II. HYDROGEOLOGY BY AQUIFERS
QUATERNARY UNCONSOLIDATED DEPOSITS
Above the Mesozoic and early Tertiary formations are several types of un-
consolidated deposits from which ground water may be derived. These unconsoli-
dated aquifers include: alluvium, colluvium, terrace deposits, eolian deposits,
glacial deposits, high-level gravels and the deeply weathered surface of some
sandstone formations.
Alluvium and terrace deposits are sinuous, river-lain sands, silts, gravels
and clays within or adjacent to present-day drainage systems. Alluvium and
terrace deposits are generally less than 30 feet thick along most drainages,
but may be as much as 200 feet thick along some of the major rivers. Colluvium
exists nearly everywhere, but it is rarely thicker than 15 feet except near the
base of slopes undergoing active erosion. Eolain deposits are quite thin also
(usually less than 10 feet thick) and sometimes are difficult to distinguish
from colluvium unless good exposures are available. Eolian deposits are commonly
found on the lee side of sandy hills and on the top of high river terraces.
Extensive areas of eolian deposits occur in glaciated northern Montana, but the
material does not resemble typical loess. Glacial deposits are found primarily
north of the Missouri River. The deposits left behind by the ice that advanced
as much as 50 miles south of the Missouri River have been largely removed by
post-glacial erosion. Glacial deposits are usually less than 50 feet thick,
but thicknesses greater than 100 feet occur in the Havre-Great Falls-Shelby
area; in the extreme northeastern corner of Montana; and where extensive terminal
or recessional moraines developed. High-level gravels are unconsolidated to
semi-consolidated, Miocene and younger, fluvial deposits. High-level gravels
adjacent to the isolated mountains of central Montana and those extending from
- 23 -

-------
the Beartooth and Bighorn mountains may have developed either as a result of
recent uplift of these mountains or from climatic change. The high-level
gravels 700 to 1,400 feet above the Missouri and Yellowstone rivers were de-
posited by river systems ancestral to these two rivers. Differential uplift,
glacial diversion and stream piracy have left many of these deposits as much as
75 miles from the present-day rivers. High-level gravels are generally less
than 50 feet thick but may be as much as 100 feet thick.
Although well yields of 1,000 gallons per minute or more have been obtained
from high-level gravels, terrace deposits, reworked glacial deposits and some
bedrock aquifers, alluvium typically yields more water to a well than any other
aquifer. The probability of obtaining water from alluvium and the shallowness
of a well neceissary to reach this water make alluvium the most-used aquifer in
the Great Plains region of Montana. This high usage of alluvium for wells
occurs because alluvial valleys often contain the best farmland and generally
have the greatest population density.
Terrace deposits within major river valleys adjacent to alluvium generally
yield more water than terrace deposits outside the main valley or where isolated
from alluvium. This difference in yield is largely a result of less ground-
water recharge to the higher or more isolated deposits.
Colluvium and eolian deposits are generally thin and rarely yield more than
10 gpm to a well. These aquifers were used mainly during the "homestead days"
when dug wells were common. Despite the low yield of water from these deposits,
the water was often satisfactory in quantity and quality to provide domestic
and stock water to the homesteader.
Well yields from glacial deposits are highly variable. Where the glacial
deposits are mainly heterogeneous silt, clay and sand (till), water is rarely
- 24 -

-------
obtained, but where glacial deposits have been reworked by running water
(glaciofluvial deposits, ice-marginal stream deposits, etc.), yields of more
than 1,000 gpm have been obtained. Generally, however, a yield of 5 to 10 gpm
may be expected from glacial deposits.
The quality of water from unconsolidated deposits is as variable as the
nature of the deposits themselves. Water from alluvium normally ranges from
300 milligrams per liter (mg/L) to 2,500 mg/L. The dissolved-solids content
increases where alluvial deposits are in contact with Cretaceous shale or
where it is influenced by salt migration from irrigated areas.
Water from colluvium or weathered bedrock contains few dissolved solids if
the parent material is a sandstone, but contains a large amount of dissolved
solids if the parent material is a siltstone or contains much shale.
Water from terrace deposits generally contains more dissolved solids than
does water from alluvium. These higher concentrations of dissolved solids
probably occur because there is less flushing of the terrace deposits by ground-
water movement. Terrace deposits that have been cultivated for many years or
that overlie shale also seem to contain water with higher concentrations of
dissolved solids.
High-level gravels often yield water with a low dissolved-solids content.
Because areas underlain by these gravels are often quite flat and cultivated,
water from these gravels is in demand for irrigation.
Fine-grained glacial deposits (till, drift and lacustrine deposits) usually
contain water with higher than average concentration of dissolved solids. This
condition probably results from tne admixture of salt-rich Cretaceous shale into
much of the glacial till. Glaciofluvial deposits, on the other hand, often
contain water with few dissolved solids.
- 25 -

-------
Unconsolidated deposits are widely used as aquifers throughout the Great
Plains region of Montana. The first well in the State was probably an alluvium
well, because the water table in alluvium is usually close to the ground surface
and the probability of obtaining water is very good—a strong consideration
when a well was made with the pickax and shovel. More water is probably with-
drawn from unconsolidated deposits (especially alluvium) than any of the other
aquifers. These shallow ground-water systems are highly susceptible to contamin-
ation and overuse.
EARLY TERTIARY FORT UNION AQUIFER
Only a few small patches of the Eocene Wasatch Formation are present in
Montana, and the Cretaceous-Paleocene Willow Creek Formation of the northwestern
Great Plains region has been little studied. For these reasons, the main forma-
tion addressed is the Fort Union Formation.
Continuous outcropping and maximum areal extent of the Fort Union Forma-
tion occur primarily in the eastern third of Montana. A large area of Fort
Union Formation that is separated from the main body lies in the Bighorn basin-
Reedpoint syncline area of south-central Montana. Small isolated patches, often
less than one square mile in extent, occur adjacent to the Bearpaw Mountains in
north-central Montana.
Erosion has removed the lower Tertiary deposits from much of Montana east
of the Disturbed Belt and has beveled much, if not all, of these formations even
where they are preserved. The lower Tertiary formations were not deposited as
a uniform, continuous blanket as were most of the previously deposited formations.
Tectonic activity of the Laramide orogeny was already producing major folds in
the nearly horizontal strata of the Great Plains region, and these lower Tertiary
- 26 -

-------
deposits are accordingly thick or thin depending upon the tectonic pattern that
was then current in their area of deposition. Over much of the Great Plains of
Montana, restored thickness of lower Tertiary deposits indicates an accumulation
of less than 1,500 feet. In the Bighorn and Powder River basins, however, lower
Tertiary formations are more than 8,000 feet thick.
The lower Tertiary formations in Montana were deposited entirely by fluvial
systems. Channel sandstones are common in the Tullock and Tongue River members
of the Fort Union Formation, and overbank siltstones and shales occur. Back-
water swamps in which lush, subtropical vegetation grew, were plentiful and of
long duration in southern Montana—especially during Tongue River time. Thick,
extensive coal beds attest to the presence of these swamps. Because lower
Tertiary sediments were deposited by fluvial systems, lithologic changes often
occur over short distances.
Ground water from lower Tertiary formations is obtained mainly from the
sandstone units and from the coal beds, but some water is obtained from clinker.
The water from the lower Tertiary formations is usually a calcium or magnesium
bicarbonate type and dissolved-solids concentrations range from about 500 mg/L
to more than 5,000 mg/L. The water quality and chemistry often reflect the
lithologic changes that are the result of fluvial deposition. Yields of water
from wells completed in lower Tertiary formations are typically less than 15 gpm,
but wells yielding as much as 50 gpm have been reported. The Fort Union Forma-
tion is the most widely used aquifer in eastern Montana; this is because of the
great areal extent of the formation and because water is often available from it
within 250 feet of the ground surface.
- 27 -

-------
FOX HILLS-HELL CREEK AQUIFERS
These uppermost Cretaceous formations once extended from western Montana
into the eastern Dakotas. Although erosion has removed much of the formations,
they still are present in eastern Montana. These formations also occur just
east of the Disturbed Belt, where they are referred to as the Horsethief Sand-
stone and St. Mary's River Formation. Throughout most of its extent, the Fox
Hills Sandstone is usually about 300 feet thick. In parts of east-central
Montana, however, it was eroded and often completely removed during Hell Creek
time. The Hell Creek Formation ranges in thickness from 500 to 1,100 feet.
The Fox Hills Sandstone was the last marine formation to have developed in
Montana. It was deposited as forset beds in a widespread delta that formed as
the Bearpaw Sea withdrew. Sandstone is its most abundant component, but silt-
stone and shale units are also present. The Hell Creek Formation is the upper-
most Cretaceous formation to be deposited in Montana. It is a fluvial deposit
that contains lenticular sandstone bodies and overbank silt and clay. Carbon-
aceous shale lenses provide evidence that swampy conditions existed during the
deposition of the Hell Creek Formation. Although the structural configuration
of the surface of these formations was formed by the end of the Laramide
orogeny, their present altitude was attained only during early Pleistocene as
the result of epeirogenic uplift.
In eastern Montana, these uppermost Cretaceous formations are sought as a
preferred source of water. Wells commonly penetrate several other water-bearing
zones that are close to the surface, but that water is cased off in order to
obtain the softer water contained in the Fox Hills and Hell Creek formations.
Total dissolved solids in these aquifers typically range from 500 mg/L to 1,100
mg/L. Yields of water from wells completed in these aquifers are also somewhat
- 28 -

-------
higher than those from aquifers nearer the surface. In many places, especially
in southeastern Montana, wells penetrating Fox Hills-Hell Creek formations will
have static water levels above that of the ground surface. Because many people
like to have flowing artesian wells as their water sources, these aquifers are
often preferred over shallower aquifers.
JUDITH RIVER AQUIFER
The Judith River Formation is a wedge of sandstone, siltstone and silty
shale overlying the Claggett Shale and underlying the Bearpaw Shale; all these
units are Cretaceous in age. Near the western margin of the Great Plains, the
Judith River Formation grades into the Two Medicine Formation and is more than
700 feet thick. Near the eastern border of Montana, the Judith River Formation
has thinned generally to less than 50 feet and is dominantly a silty shale. In
much of north-central Montana, the lower part of the Judith River Formation is
a fluvial, continental deposit and includes coal seams as much as 5 feet thick.
In south-central Montana, the lower part of the Judith River Formation is a
marine sandstone and is often designated as the Parkman Sandstone or Parkman
Member of the Judith River Formation. Although the Judith River Formation thins
eastward, east-west zones occur where the formation is considerably thicker than
it is either to the north or south. These east-west zones probably mark the
location of fluvial distributary channels or major, near-shore, submarine
channels that were later filled with sand transported by longshore currents.
The present structural configuration of the Judith River Formation was essentially
attained at the close of the Laramide orogeny. At that time, however, the top
surface of the formation was generally well below sea level except along the
major uplifts. The Judith River Formation was raised to its present altitude
during the early Pleistocene as a result of regional epeirogenic uplift.
- 29 -

-------
Well yields from the Judith River Formation range up to approximately
100 gpm. There is usually a good correlation between yield and total sand-
stone thickness for wells that fully penetrate an aquifer. Unfortunately,
most wells completed in the Judith River Formation do not fully penetrate it,
but stop when enough water for household or stock use has been obtained. Thus,
the yields from this aquifer usually reflect water needs rather than true
capacity of the aquifer. High drilling costs and low well yields have combined
to prevent development of this aquifer where it is substantially beyond 500 feet
below ground surface. Consequently, little is known about its water-yielding
capabilities or potentiometric surface with distance from the outcrop areas.
Water in the Judith River Formation is under sufficient pressure to cause
it to rise in a well considerably above the level at which it enters the well.
Flowing wells occur along the Missouri River between Little Rocky Mountains and
Larb Creek and along the Musselshell River (and its preglacial course) from
about Mosby to Beaver Creek.
The quality of water from the Judith River Formation can range up to
27,500 mg/L dissolved solids. The water with the fewest dissolved solids is
found close to recharge areas, and the more saline water is found in the eastern
part of the State where for formation contains more shale. Ground water that
stays in contact with salt-containing formations leaches the salts by solution.
In structurally low areas, this water rarely moves laterally, and the dissolved-
solids concentration of the water increases greatly. Wide ranges in water
quality occur even near the outcrops. These quality variations may reflect
lithologic differences.
- 30 -

-------
EAGLE AQUIFER
The Eagle Formation is one of the main aquifers in the northwestern part
of the Great Plains region of Montana. It is also commonly used in southern
Montana west of 108° west longitude. The areas in which this aquifer is highly
used correspond to the area of its outcrop and where the formation is less than
300 feet below the ground surface. The Eagle Formation is rarely more than
400 feet thick; its thickest section is near the western limit of the Great
Plains region where the formation is predominantly sandstone. Siltstone and
shale become dominant in the Eagle Formation with distance eastward from the
Disturbed Belt. East of 107° west longitude, the Eagle Formation contains so
much shale that it is often called the Gammon Formation or Gammon Shale and
includes the equally shaley Telegraph Creek Formation. The Gammon Shale is
exposed in the Black Hills uplift of southeastern Montana but contains so much
shale that only about five wells are known to obtain water from it. The yields
from these wells average less than 3 gpm, and the water can be used only for
stock watering. The Eagle Formation receives little use as an aquifer in
northeastern Montana because of its great depth below surface and scant yield
of water. In northwestern Montana and near Bowdoin Dome, water from the Eagle
Formation may contain natural gas. Cattle will drink this water after some of
the gas has escaped, but humans who try to use this water complain of a sulfur
taste.
In the areas where the Eagle Formation is highly used as a source of water,
the quality of its water is generally good. Dissolved-solids content of the
water is usually less than 1,500 mg/L and often less than 1,000 mg/L. Yields
of 500 gpm have been reported from the Cut Bank area, but yields generally
average less than 50 gpm.
- 31 -

-------
KOOTENAI AQUIFER
In latest Jurassic time, mountain uplift began in extreme western Montana
and eastern Idaho with the primary intrusion of the Idaho batholith. The
intensive mountain building of the Laramide orogeny was millions of years in
the future, but the steepened gradients formed by these newly emergent hills
produced streams that flowed eastward across swampy deposits that were to
become the Morrison Formation. At first the streams cut into the eroded
Morrison deposits, but as uplift ceased or was reduced in the west, the streams
began to deposit sand along their channels. In time, the channels coalesced
and migrated laterally. Eventually, sand blanketed most of eastern Montana to
a depth of as much as 100 feet. This sand now forms the basal unit of the
Kootenai Formation and is referred to as the Sunburst Sandstone, Cutbank Sand-
stone, the Third Cat Creek Sandstone, the Pryor Conglomerate or the Lakota
Sandstone. Following the deposition of this basal unit, crustal subsidence of
the continental interior allowed the Cretaceous sea to enter eastern Montana.
In this sea, the upper part of the Kootenai Formation was deposited. It consists
of maroon or red and green shale with local bodies of sandstone. Locally, fresh-
water limestone was deposited.
The basal sandstone unit of the Kootenai Formation is the main aquifer,
but in many places the upper sandstone units and the limestone unit produce
enough water for stock or domestic use. Throughout most of the central and
western Montana plains, where the Kootenai Formation is within 500 feet of the
surface, the Kootenai Formation is sought for its ground water. Although yields
as low as 10 gpm are sometimes obtained from the upper part of this formation,
yields of 300 gpm have been obtained from the basal sandstone. In many places
a well tapping the basal sandstone will produce flowing water.
- 32 -

-------
Chemical analyses of water from the Kootenai 'Formation show dissolved
solids ranging from less than 204 mg/L near outcrop areas in the Little Belt
Mountains to more than 14,000 mg/L in the Sweetgrass Arch near Cutbank.
SWIFT AQUIFER
The only Jurassic formation known to have sufficient water-bearing
potential to be considered an aquifer is the Swift Formation. This formation
is present throughout the Great Plains region of Montana except in the central
areas of the plains mountains from where it has been eroded. The Swift Forma-
tion generally thickens from west to east. It is about 100 feet thick along
the east edge of the Disturbed Belt and 400 to 600 feet thick along Montana's
eastern border. This greater thickness is caused by shale units which are
more abundant in the east than in the west. Throughout most of central and
western Montana the Swift Formation contains a total sandstone thickness of
40 to 150 feet. In eastern Montana, however, the total sandstone thickness is
commonly less than 50 feet and in many places is less than 25 feet.
Because the Swift Formation is at a considerable depth below land surface,
few wells have been drilled into it solely to obtain water; thus, most informa-
tion on its water-bearing characteristics comes from oil wells. This information
indicates that where total sandstone thickness is more than 100 feet (western
and central Great Plains region), wells will generally yield 50 gallons of water
per minute. In eastern Montana, where the Swift Formation is much deeper below
land surface and where the total thickness of sandstone is less, data are in-
sufficient to evaluate its aquifer characteristics.
Almost all chemical analyses of water from the Swift Formation are from
western and north-central Montana. These analyses show that water from the
- 33 -

-------
Swift Formation commonly contains less than 500 mg/L dissolved solids with 10
miles of the outcrop, but dissolved solids increase rapidly with increasing dis-
tance from the outcrop. Water with a dissolved-solids content of more than
4,000 mg/L is found in many places along the axis of the Sweetgrass Arch.
MADISON GROUP
The Madison Group aquifer extends across the entire Great Plains region.
It is absent only in a few small areas at the center of mountain uplifts where
it has been removed by emplacement of igneous rocks or by erosion. The Madison
Group is dominantly limestone, but its uppermost unit, the Charles Formation,
becomes increasingly an anhydrite with proximity to the center of the Williston
basin. In some places the limestone has been largely dolomitized. Throughout
most of eastern Montana, the Madison Group is more than 600 feet thick. A
maximum thickness of more than 1,000 feet occurs along a trough that extends
from the Big Snowy Mountains to the center of the Williston basin. Because of
its great potential as an aquifer, the Madison Group has been the object of an
extensive drilling and investigation program throughout the northern Great
Plains. Data are currently becoming available to make a reasonably detailed
evaluation of this aquifer, however, deep drilling depths have deterred
extensive development.
The test wells drilled through the Madison Group showed a great degree of
variability in yield of water from this aquifer. The yield was highly dependent
on fracture porosity, initial porosity and degree of dolomitization. Well
yields ranged from 20 gpm to more than 1,000 gpm. Data from oil-well drill-
stem tests are currently being compiled to determine the spatial variation in
water yield. Because the Madison Group is recharged with ground water in the
central areas of mountain uplifts, water in this aquifer is commonly under
- 34 -

-------
enough pressure to flow at the surface from any well that penetrates the aquifer.
In some places the pressure is great enough to produce a static water level
several hundred feet above the land surface.
The quality of water in the Madison Group is highly dependent on the com-
position of the Madison Group and the distance the water has traveled from area
of recharge or, more specifically, the amount of time it has spent within the
aquifer. Adjacent to the mountains, where the aquifer is recharged and where
the Madison Group is dominantly limestone, dissolved-solids content of the water
within the Madison Group is commonly less than 500 mg/L. Dissolved-solids con-
tent of the water increases within a few miles of the 500 mg/L isoline to more
than 1,000 mg/L, and then increases more slowly. Near the periphery of the
Williston basin, where the Charles Formation is largely an anhydrite, dissolved
solids again rapidly increase from 4,000-5,000 mg/L to more than 15,000 mg/L
within about 10 miles. The dissolved-solids content of water from the Madison
Group near the center of the Williston basin is greater than 300,000 mg/L, or
about 10 times that of seawater.
Water-bearing formations occur below the base of the Madison Group. Some
of these formations have great potential as aquifers. The well depth required
to obtain water from these formations exceeds 6,000 feet throughout most of
eastern Montana. Well depths of 16,000 feet are necessary to reach the base of
the deeper formations in the Williston basin. Because of these extreme drilling
depths and the sparse data on aquifer characteristics, these pre-Madison Group
formations are not included as aquifers in this report.
- 35 -

-------
III. GROUND-WATER USE
Information on water use in Montana prior to 1980 is extremely limited
because of a lack of accurate withdrawal-rate data. While communities have the
best opportunity to record water use, in most instances only new delivery
systems are equipped to measure discharge. Similarly, rural, agricultural and
industrial water users often have no means of measurement, and only estimates
can be made for these values. However, Montana is presently quantifying its
water use and consumption through a water-right adjudication program. This
program is being implemented through the Department of Natural Resources and
Conservation under Senate Bill No. 76. All water-use applications are to be
filed by April 30, 1982, and then will be reviewed and summarized. Better
estimates of precise ground-water and surface-water use will become available
after that date.
Major uses of ground water in the Great Plains region are for irrigation,
municipalities, industry, rural domestic use and livestock. Table 1-4 is a
summary, by county, from MBMG's well appropriation files of the various well
uses in this region. Most of these wells are completed in the Quaternary
alluvium or Tertiary and Cretaceous aquifers, although deeper aquifers are
exploited locally. The cumulative total of ground water withdrawn from the
Great Plains region is approximatley 114.41 million gallons per day (mgd), or
351.24 acre-feet per day. This value for ground water represents about 2
percent of the total amount of water diverted within the Great Plains region,
a value much lower than for most other western states. Even though 2 percent
is a small percentage, ground water is the only viable source of potable water
that can and will be further developed now that surface-water supplies are over-
appropriated in this region.
- 36 -

-------
TABLE I - 4
WELL USE BY COUNTY IN THE GREAT PLAINS REGION
COUNTY	COM	DOM	D+S	IRR	IND	PUB	STK	MU	OTH	NOT	TOTAL
RPT
Bighorn
3
199
180
7
18
10
377
39
41
13
887
Blaine
1
109
233
23
6
8
374
14
¦10
8
786
Carbon
1
611
269
13
2
13
202
55
63
8
1237
Carter
0
65
120
0
0
2
648
13
6
0
854
Cascade
22
904
417
14
5
U
233
62
53
1
1722
Chotcau
0
96
395
6
0
28
338
82
34
5
984
Cus ter
12
225
218
19
3
9
685
92
22
8
1293
Daniels
1
135
126
2
2
6
191
74
11
6
554
Dawson
13
362
338
17
17
14
693
89
30
4
1577
FalIon
0
62
235
3
8
7
568
28
8
6
925
Fergus
1
301
424
10
13
7
449
110
52
3
1370
Garfield
0
65
153
4
2
2
685
25
15
0
951
Golden Valley
0
50
115
3
0
0
276
17
3
0
464
Hill
0
345
319
12
9
21
226
70
25
4
1031
Judith Basin
2
175
150
15
3
8
308
60
15
1
737
Liber ty
0
66
102
2
0
3
116
33
7
1
330
McCone
2
133
167
10
0
7
486
25
12

851
Musselshell
0
235
311
6
2
9
823
33
14
21
1454
Petroleum
1
15
56
4
47
1
189
22
7
1
343
Phillips
2
162
435
20
8
7
476
29
21

1164
Pondera
0
36
148
2
(1
13
83
21
6
1
310
Powder River
1
226
216
28
3
9
1577
11
15
1
2087
Prairie
4
109
102
10
9
5
580
14
10
1
844
Richland
1
354
281
1 7
2 1
20
817
48
17
8
1586
Roosevelt
1
193
212
41
1 !
10
331
48
10
9
868
Rosebud
0
164
152
9
1 7
21
663
21
32
9
1088
Sheridan
0
112
224
5
b
12
185
26
19
4
593
Stillwater
3
453
215
7
5
6
394
40
30
1
1154
Sweetgrass
0
185
156
5
2
2
175
22
11
1
559
Teton
5
368
390
43
2
10
257
79
14
4
1172
Toole
0
23
88
4
1
1 1
123
47
14
2
313
Treasure
0
27
44
2
0
2
221
9
0
1
306
Valley
0
273
435
21
6
24
553
99
29
21
1461
Wheatland
1
64
57
8
2
2
288
26
10
0
458
Wibaux
0
51
188
5
2
7
405
23
12
1
694
Yellowstone
4
1711
544
152
17
'8
737
219
54
8
3464
Total
81
8664
8215
549
253
34 5
15732
1725
732
175
36471
COM- Community; DOM-Domestic; D+S-Domcstic and Stockwntor; IRR-1rngation; IND-Industrial; PUB-Public; STK-
Stockwater only; MU-Multiusc; OTH-Othcr; NOT RPT- Not Reported.
- 37 -

-------
MUNICIPAL AND DOMESTIC
A computer listing produced by the Montana Department of Health and
Environmental Sciences (1980) shows that there are 89 communities in the
Great Plains region of Montana that have a municipal water-supply system. The
total number of public supply systems exceeds 250, including trailer courts,
nursing homes and other institutions. Of the 89 communities, 13 rely exclusively
on surface water, another 8 use both surface and ground water and the remaining
68 communities depend solely on wells or springs for their water supply. Of
the 393,063 people who reside within the Great Plains region of Montana,
approximately 264,300 live in municipalities. Of these, 91,400 (35 percent)
depend exclusively upon ground water for their drinking and household needs;
they withdraw a total of about 19.06 million gallons of ground water per day.
Only a small percentage of this total is used to satisfy industrial or commercial
needs.
Although several different aquifers are used throughout the Montana plains
for municipal water, no study or examination has been made to determine which
aquifers are used. A cursory examination of the relationship of towns in the
plains to geology indicates that perhaps as many as 90 percent of these water
supplies derive their water from alluvium or other unconsolidated deposits. At
least two towns (Broadus and Ekalaka) obtain water from either the Fox Hills or
Hell Creek formations; several may obtain water from the Eagle and Kootenai
formations; and Lewistown obtains its water supply from a spring that emerges
from a limestone formation of the Madison Group.
The quality of water used by many of the communities in the Montana plains
region often exceeds the EPA's maximum recommended limits for dissolved solids.
Several systems distribute water that contains more than 1,500 mg/L, and the
- 38 -

-------
well supplying the town of Jordan has dissolved solids of about 1,800 mg/L.
Although these values greatly exceed the 500 mg/L recommended maximum, most
communities have no other source.
Iron is a problem for many community water systems. Most systems dis-
tribute water that contains less than the recommended maximum of 0.3 mg/L for
iron, but some greatly exceed it. Four community systems that distribute water
exceeding 4.0 mg/L in 1980 were North Harlem Colony, Wibaux, Wolf Point and
Wyola. Nitrates in water are a problem in some farming communities, both from
application of fertilizers and from degradation of water supplies caused by
saline seeps. The following community systems in 1980 delivered water with
exceptionally high nitrate values: North Turner Colony (35 mg/L), Flaxville
(28 mg/L), Conrad (21 mg/L), Coffee Creek (14 mg/L), and Denton (13 mg/L). In
addition, the water from several trailer courts was analyzed and found to contain
more than 7 mg/L. These latter high nitrate values may result from septic-system
effluent or related pollution. Fluoride values are generally well below the EPA
recommended maximum. Community systems that distributed water high in fluorides
in 1980 were: Sidney (5.1 mg/L), Circle (4.7 mg/L), Richey (4.2 mg/L), and
Lambert (4.0 mg/L). Several trailer courts also distributed water in 1980 that
exceeded 2.0 mg/L. Trace metals in water from public supply systems were all
usually within the recommended maximum. One exception was Lodge Grass with
0.805 mg/L of lead.
Domestic water is that which is used by all persons not served by a munici-
pal or community water system. For the most part, domestic wells primarily
belong to rural residents, although some subdivisions have individual wells.
There are approximately 17,000 domestic and stockwater wells in the Great Plains
region. Ground water from these wells provides 95 percent of the rural population
- 39 -

-------
with a potable supply. Rural inhabitants withdraw 25.85 million gallons per
day, most of which is consumed.
Domestic wells are commonly drilled until sufficient amounts of relatively
good quality water are reached, and for this reason, well yields are generally
small. For most rural inhabitants of the Great Plains region, ground water is
essential for their well being and livelihood.
AGRICULTURE
Agriculture is the largest ground-water user in the Great Plains region.
The principal use of ground water is for cropland irrigation with a secondary
use for livestock consumption.
IRRIGATION
There are about 1,347,740 acres of irrigated land in the Great Plains
region. However, the percentage of this acreage that is irrigated in any
given year is uncertain. Roughly 5.62 billion gallons per day (bgd) are diverted
to this acreage, of which 1 percent is withdrawn from ground-water sources.
Almost all of these irrigation wells are completed in the unconsolidated
alluvial aquifer. The Madison aquifer is also receiving renewed interest as a
deeper source of good-quality water.
Requirements for diversion are more than double consumptive use, resulting
in a return flow of 53 percent of the total diversion (DNRC, 1975). Consumptive
use varies with irrigation efficiency, rates of application and other factors
such as the crop, soil, precipitation, growing season and temperature. Nearly
all irrigation is used to raise crops and feed to support the livestock industry.
- 40 -

-------
LIVESTOCK
Stock consumptive use of ground water in the Great Plains region is
estimated to be 19.71 million gallons per day, of which 50 percent is withdrawn
from ground-water sources. Cattle and sheep account for most of the water
being consumed, with average daily consumption values of 15 and 3 gallons per
head per day, respectively. Pigs, horses and other livestock make up the
remainder of stock water consumed.
Stock water wells comprise the largest single category of permitted wells
in this region; roughly 43 percent of the wells in the Great Plains region are
used solely for stock-watering purposes. These wells tap all the aquifers
within the region and are usually completed when a sufficient yield is obtained.
In many cases these wells are the only viable source of water in the area for
livestock ranchers.
INDUSTRY
Ground-water withdrawals by industry are separated into two distinct con-
stituents: (1) the petroleum industry, which uses the largest quantity; and
(2) self-supplied industry, which withdraws only a minor amount.
Ground-water withdrawals by the petroleum industry fall into two major
categories—fresh water, which is developed solely for use in the secondary
recovery of crude oil; and produced water, which is withdrawn as a byproduct
of primary and secondary oil recovery. Estimates of the total petroleum ground
water withdrawn are highly variable, and for this reason an accurate value could
not be predicted. However, records show that there are 659 injection wells re-
injecting water for secondary recovery in the Great Plains region. According
to Montana's Oil and Gas Conservation Division (1980), these wells have an
- 41 -

-------
average daily injection rate of 15.06 million gallons per day (mgd).
Major aquifers used to produce water for secondary oil recovery include
the Fox Hills, Judith River, Eagle and Kootenai formations and the Madison
Group. The Madison aquifer has been the principal source of secondary recovery
water for most oil fields in this region.
Future projections of oil production within the Big Horn basin cannot be
made reliably. Much oil remains to be produced by secondary and tertiary
recovery methods, but economics will play a major role in whether or not this
oil is produced. It seems likely that with rising prices, oil production in
the basin, especially the percentage produced by secondary recovery methods,
will continue to grow, as will petroleum-industry water consumption.
The Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation defines
self-supplied industrial water as that which is obtained from a source of
supply by industry, as opposed to that provided by a municipality. An industry
is also considered to be self-supplied if any of the water it uses is obtained
from its privately owned water-supply facilities. The primary industrial use
of water is for condenser cooling, while smaller amounts are used for processing,
washing, conveying, air conditioning, boiler feeding and sanitation. Ground
water accounts for about 10.5 percent of the total water used by industry in
the Great Plains region. Approximately 3.47 million gallons of ground water
are used daily as self-supplied industrial water. A large percentage of this
water is consumed by industry. Examples of consumptive use are water that is
canned or bottled in foods or beverages, and water absorbed or chemically
combined into a manufactured product.
- 42 -

-------
IV. WATER QUALITY
DATA SOURCES
More than 3,000 water-quality analyses contained in the computer files
at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) were reviewed for the
Underground Injection Control project, with approximately 2,700 of these
analyses from the Great Plains region. Additional analyses were located and
reviewed from MBMG and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications, including
bulletins, memoirs, open-file reports, professional papers, hydrologic atlas
maps and unpublished reports. USGS Open-File Report 76-40, by William Hopkins,
provided much data relating to deeper aquifers in eastern Montana.
The MBMG water-quality file contains water-quality analyses generated by
the MBMG Analytical Division. Primary customers of this Division are the MBMG
Hydrology Division, the USGS Water Resources Division and the U.S. Forest
Service (USFS). The USGS Water Resources Division and the MBMG Hydrology
Division furnish water samples taken from ground-water sources within the
State of Montana to the MBMG laboratory for analysis, and the results of these
analyses become part of an integrated data bank. Approximatley 2,000 ground-
water analyses were completed and entered into computer's storage during the
USGS's Northern Great Plains project of recent years. Additionally, the computer
files contain data extracted from selected USGS and MBMG publications that
existed prior to the creation of the data bank. Documents such as USGS Water-
Supply Papers 599 and 600, covering ground-water resources for Rosebud, Treasure
and Yellowstone counties, have been coded and included in the file. Many
similar publications are yet to be included.
Appendix V contains a tabulation of those analyses in the ground-water-
quality system selected for this project. These analyses have been sorted by
- 43 -

-------
aquifer, and also according to township, range and section within the region.
Many of these have been plotted on the Dissolved Solids Map series included
with this report. Occasionally, points will appear on the listings that have
not been plotted on the maps, and conversely, points will appear on the maps
which are not contained in the tabulation. This has occurred because much of
the previously published data are not computerized and because the listings
may include data created since the compilation of the maps.
GENERAL WATER QUALITY
Ground-water quality data for eight aquifers or aquifer groups in the
Great Plains region were compiled. These aquifers included:
1.	Quaternary and Late Tertiary unconsolidated deposits
2.	Fort Union and Wasatch Aquifers
3.	Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers
4.	Judith River (Parkman) Aquifer
5.	Eagle (Virgelle) Aquifer
6.	Kootenai Aquifer
7.	Jurassic Formations
8.	Madison Group and other formations of
Mississippian age
The next sections will discuss the water quality of these eight groups in
terms of their dissolved solids concentrations expressed as milligrams per
liter (mg/L) and dominant cations and anions prevalent.
- 44 -

-------
Quaternary and Late Tertiary Unconsolidated Deposits
The MBMG water quality file contains 575 dissolved solids values reported
from 587 water quality analyses for water from Quaternary unconsolidated
deposits in the Great Plains region. The data base for this aquifer represents
a general overview of water quality for alluvial, glacial outwash, and glacial
drift deposits. However, because the MBMG has historically been involved in
research on subjects such as coal field and saline-seep hydrology, the data set
presents a bias towards waters characteristic of these hydrologic situations.
To lessen any bias, water analyses for waters produced by mine spoils have not
been included and multiple analyses for water from research wells have been
deleted. Even so, the water related to research sites is able to influence the
entire data set. For example, the average sulfate ion concentration of 3097 mg/L
for the unconsolidated formations includes approximately 50 analyses for saline-
seep waters with sulfate ion concentrations ranging from 10,000 to 50,000 mg/L.
Analyses such as these effectively increase the average dissolved solids
concentration.
The lowest dissolved solids concentration for water from the Quaternary
deposits is from a 56-foot deep well located in T. IS., R. 14 E., section
21 ACAD in Sweetgrass County. This well produces a calcium bicarbonate type
water having a dissolved solids concentration of 137 mg/L from an alluvial
aquifer closely related to the Boulder River. The highest reported dissolved
solids concentration is for water from a saline-seep research well at a saline-
seep research site in Fergus County. This well is located in T. 17 N., R. 15 E.,
section 7 AAAB and produced magnesium sulfate water with 68,095 mg/L of dissolved
solids for a water quality sample collected in 1979.
Figure 1-6 is a histogram showing the number of analyses in this data file
versus different ranges of dissolved solids concentrations. The most common
analyses are for water with less than 2,000 mg/L of dissolved solids. The
- 45 -

-------
175-
150-
125-
ino
1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 46 -

-------
histogram also indicates some trends in water quality in terms of dissolved
constituents. Waters with bicarbonate as the predominate anion were found in
127 of the 161 analyses within the dissolved solids concentration range of
0 to 1,000 mg/L. Above 1,001 mg/L of dissolved solids only 30 of 414 analyses
were for bicarbonate type water. The sulfate anion is present in all of the
dissolved solids intervals, but becomes exclusive in the higher concentrations.
Calcium, magnesium, and sodium cations are dominant in waters with dissolved
solids concentrations of less than 3,000 mg/L, but above 3,000 mg/L sodium
becomes predominate.
The late Tertiary unconsolidated rocks of the Great Plains regions consist
principally of the Flaxville Formation and its equivalents. Only four analyses
for waters from these deposits are in the data file. Dissolved solids for
these analyses range from 250 to 900 mg/L. Of these, three analyses reported
magnesium as being the dominant cation, and all four reported bicarbonate as
the dominant anion. The fourth analysis had calcium as the dominant cation.
Zimmerman (1960) reported four additional analyses from northern Blaine County,
Montana. These analyses ranged in dissolved solids from 300 to 1,430 mg/L.
Two of these waters were sodium bicarbonate, while the others were sodium
sulfate and magnesium bicarbonate waters.
The Flaxville Formation gravels underlie approximately 37 townships in
northeastern and eastern Montana. The formation generally occurs in isolated
patches except on the Big Flat north of Harlem and in the Plentywood-Scobey
area of northeastern Montana. In these latter areas, the Flaxville Formation
is an important water source, often providing the best quality water available
in the area, but elsewhere it finds relatively minor use as an aquifer.
- 47 -

-------
Fort Union and Wasatch Aquifers
Over 1,700 water quality analyses representing 1,330 individual wells or
springs are found for Early Tertiary aquifers of the Great Plains region in
the MBMG data bank. The data set represents a reasonable geographic overview
for these aquifers, but portions of it represent densely concentrated data
points in the coal fields of southeast Montana. The MBMG and USGS have had
a historic interest in the coal hydrology of these areas and research sites
have generated many water quality analyses to obtain detailed water quality
profiles. As in the Quaternary unconsolidated deposits data set, analyses
representing numerous samples from the same site or research well have been
deleted leaving one representative analysis. Detailed water quality descrip-
tions of many coal hydrology research sites are presented in Van Voast and
others, 1977, Van Voast, 1974 and Van Voast, 1975.
The lowest dissolved solids concentration of 111 mg/L was found in a
sample from a 71 foot deep well located in T. IN., R. 41 E., section 17 BBBB
in Rosebud County. This well produced a sodium bicarbonate water which was
unused at the time of sampling. The highest dissolved solids concentration of
9,578 mg/L was found in a sample from a 94 foot deep research well located in
T. 9 S., R. 44 E., section 7 BACD in Bighorn County. The water is unused and
is a sodium sulfate type. Figure 1-7 is a histogram of frequency of occurrence
compared to dissolved solids in mg/L for water analyses from the early Tertiary
Fort Union aquifer in the MBMG system. This chart shows that the bulk of the
analyses were for water less than 3,000 mg/L of dissolved solids and only 180
(14%) were for waters with greater than 3,000 mg/L of dissolved solids.
Virtually all of the higher dissolved solids samples were sodium or magnesium
sulfate waters. In the 0 to 3,000 mg/L range, as the dissolved solids
- 48 -

-------
700-
FIGURE ~ 1-7 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM EARLY TERTIARY FORT UNION AQUIFERS,
GREAT PLAINS REGION, MONTANA
-700
600"
500-
400
300-
200-
100
-500
NaHC03
MgS04
NaS04
OTHERS
(MgHC03) (CaHC03)
(CaS04) (NaC03)
l-MgS04
4g	 5-NaS04
1-NaHCQ-^
13 X 7
l-NaS04
2-MgS04 1-MgSO^
2. I 2 / I-N3SO4
=*»
1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
600
-400
-300
•200
•100
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 49 -

-------
concentration decreases the bicarbonate anion becomes more common with sodium,
magnesium and calcium the predominate cations. However, in the 0 to 1,000 mg/L
dissolved solids range the number of analyses reporting bicarbonate waters
becomes greater than the number of analyses reporting sulfate water.
Figure 1-7 does not indicate where in the Early Tertiary formations a
particular water type of dissolved solids concentration is likely to be found.
Lee (1981), in USGS Water Supply Paper 2076 discussing the geochemistry of
water in the Fort Union Formation within the Northern Powder River Basin, pro-
vided a good description of water qualities in these rocks. Lee correlated
665 samples from springs, wells less than 200 feet, and wells greater than 200
feet in depth with water chemistry and found distinct differences between these
three sources. Water from springs ranged from a low of 160 mg/L to a high of
5,260 mg/L and averaged 1,630 mg/L of dissolved solids primarily being a calcium
sodium sulfate type water. For wells less than 200 feet in depth, the dissolved
solids concentrations ranged from 110 to 6,300 mg/L, averaged 2,100 mg/L and
were primarily magnesium sodium sulfate type waters. The third category, wells
greater than 200 feet in depth, ranged in dissolved solids concentrations from
390 mg/L to 5,720 mg/L, averaged 1,400 mg/L, and were predominantly magnesium
sodium bicarbonate type waters. Lee suggested that water qualities in the
Fort Union formation of the northern Powder River Basin were controlled by a
static regional system overlain by smaller dynamic recharge-storage-discharge
cells.
Fox Hills-Hell Creek Aquifers
The regional Fox Hills and Hell Creek aquifers in eastern Montana are
represented by 278 water-quality analyses in the MBMG's water-quality files.
- 50 -

-------
Ground water from these formations is generally soft and is of good quality,
ranging in dissolved solids from 107 to 4,400 mg/L. The lowest dissolved-
solids value reported is from an 80-foot well in Sweet Grass County, which is
completed in the Hell Creek Formation. The water is used for domestic purposes
and is a sodium bicarbonate type. The highest dissolved-solids value of
4,421 mg/L was measured in water from a 350-foot stock well in Musselshell
County, and the water is a sodium sulfate type.
Figure 1-8 is a histogram of the number of analyses of waters versus
dissolved solids for the Fox Hills and Hell Creek aquifers. This histogram
shows that 223 of the 276 samples (81%) were for waters with less than 2,000 mg/L
of dissolved solids. There are no reports of waters containing more than 10,000
mg/L of dissolved solids in these aquifers. The frequency of higher dissolved
solids from the Fox Hills and Hell Creek formations is more often a sodium
bicarbonate type, with sodium sulfate becoming predominant as values above
1,000 mg/L occur.
Judith River Aquifer
MBMG's data file contains 221 analyses of Judith River Formation waters.
Measurements range from a low dissolved-solids value of 161 mg/L for water from
a 203-foot well in Wheatland County, to a high value of 27,500 mg/L for ground
water from a 200-foot well in Liberty County. The low value represents a
calcium bicarbonate type that is used for stock water. The high dissolved-
solids value is a sodium sulfate type that is unused.
Figure 1-9 is a histogram showing the number of analyses and dominant
water type plotted against values for dissolved solids. The three most common
water types in descending order are: sodium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate and
- 51 -

-------
140-
FICURE ~ 1-8 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM THE FOX HILLS-HELL CREEK AQUIFERS,
GREAT PLAINS REGION, MONTANA.
- HO
120-
- 120
116
ioo-;;
96
c/}
w
o
a
w
ps
o&
P
u
o
o
o
Pi
Cx]
80-
60-
40-
20-
0
1001
- 100
NaHCO-
NaSO/
CaHCO-;
OTHERS
(CaS04) (MgHC03)
(NaCl)
2001
	I*'p	 .							j
3001 '4001 '5001 '6001 '7001 '8001 '9001 MOOOCf

-80
r 60
C/}
W
o
a
w
pd
pi
P
o
u
o
o
pi
w
40
- 20
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 52 -

-------
C/3
w
o
z
w
pi
pi
!=>
o
a
o
pu
o
o4
w
	 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7.000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 53 -

-------
sodium chloride. Other water types reported include magnesium sulfate (8
occurrences), magnesium bicarbonate (2 occurrences), and calcium bicarbonate
(5 occurrences). The histogram shows that analyses with dissolved solids of
less than 2,000 mg/L are dominantly sodium bicarbonate waters, with sodium
sulfate becoming more common as dissolved solids increase. Variability in
water types appears to decrease as values of dissolved solids increase. Of
the 220 analyses, 162 or 74% contained less than 3,000 mg/L of dissolved
solids, and four analyses were for waters in excess of 10,000 mg/L. All
waters having dissolved-solids values of more than 5,000 mg/L were sodium
sulfate waters.
Eagle (Virgelle) Aquifer
The Eagle Formation of north-central Montana has 93 analyses on file in
the water-quality data bank. Waters range from a low dissolved-solids value
of 285 mg/L in a 91-foot well in southern Blaine County, on the northwest
flanks of the Little Rocky Mountains, to a high value of approximately 16,000
mg/L of a sodium sulfate water from a 91-foot flowing well in Toole County. A
dissolved-solids value of 13,000 mg/L of a sodium chloride water recovered
during a drill-stem test of the Shannon Sandstone in Bighorn County was also
reported. Both occurrences of dissolved solids in excess of 10,000 mg/L are
apparently related to oil and gas exploration work. The Shannon test was from
ground water between 2,300 and 2,350 feet below land surface.
Copious data points appear on the Eagle Formation DS map from the Cut Bank
area—an area of primary use for this aquifer. Data for this region are con-
tained in MBMG Bulletin 60, by E.A. Zimmerman. Analyses in this report are
from water samples taken between T. 32 N. to T. 37 N., and between R. 3 W. to
- 54 -

-------
R. 6 W., in Toole and Glacier counties. Values of dissolved solids in this
area ranged from 384 mg/L in a 160-foot well in T. 34 N., R. 5 W., section
35DC, to 5,210 mg/L in a 575-foot well in T. 36 N., R. 6 W., section 21CB.
According to Zimmerman (1960), the quality of the water in the Eagle Formation
varies locally in this area, but sodium is normally the predominant cation and
bicarbonate or sulfate the predominate anions.
Figure 1-10 is a histogram showing the number of analyses versus dissolved-
solids values for the Eagle aquifer. Of the samples in MBMG's data files, 45
(58%) had dissolved-solids values of less than 2,000 mg/L. Most of these were
sodium bicarbonate waters, with the second most prevalent type being sodium
sulfate waters. Other ground-water types represented were calcium sulfate (2
occurrences), calcium bicarbonate (5 occurrences), magnesium sulfate (2 occur-
rences), calcium bicarbonate (5 occurrences), and magnesium sulfate (1 occurrence).
Above the 2,000 mg/L level, sodium bicarbonate waters become less common and
sodium sulfate waters more prevalent. Sodium chloride waters also become more
common above this level.
Kootenai Aquifer
The water-quality data bank contains 130 analyses of Kootenai Formation
and Kootenai-equivalent waters. Equivalent formations included are the Cloverly,
the Fuson, the Lakota and the Second and Third Cat Creek sandstones. In addi-
tion to those analyses in MBMG's files, 20 analyses presented by Hopkins in
1976 were reviewed. Of the 130 samples, 108 are from wells or springs in an
area bounded by T. UN. on the south side and T. 18 N. on the north side, and
R. 9 E. and R. 35 E. on the west and east sides, respectively, in Judith Basin
and Fergus counties. Therefore, only a limited areal extent of these aquifers
- 55 -

-------
35-
FIGURE — I-10 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM THE EAGLE AQUIFER, GREAT PLAINS REGION,
MONTANA.
30"
:\U _,N .J
-30
NaHC03
NaS04
- 25
OTHERS
(NaCl) (MgS04)
(CaS04) (MgHC03)
(CaHC03)
~i	1	1	' "t 0
1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
¦35
- 20
r 15
10
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 56 -

-------
is represented, although this is their primary-use area. A low dissolved-
solids value of 204 mg/L was reported in water from a 690-foot well in Judith
Basin County; this water is a calcium bicarbonate type. A high dissolved-
solids value of 10,500 mg/L, representing a sodium chloride water, was reported
in drill-stem test water from an oil well completed in the Third Cat Creek
Formation in Stillwater County.
The histogram of Figure 1-11 shows that 121 (81%) of the 150 analyses
have dissolved-solids values of less than 1,000 mg/L. These waters are
primarily sodium bicarbonate (32%), calcium bicarbonate (37%), and calcium
sulfate (18%). So few samples exist in the higher values ranging between 1,000
and 5,000 mg/L, that water-type breakdowns are not valid; however, it does
appear that sodium chloride-type waters become moTe common. In the Cut Bank
area, the lower Kootenai-equivalent sands are oil and gas producers and contain
water ranging from 4,000 to 14,000 mg/L of dissolved solids.
Jurassic Aquifers
Of the 35 analyses (34 MBMG and 1 Hopkins) reviewed for aquifers in
Jurassic-age rocks, one contained 36,100 mg/L of dissolved solids. This water
was a sodium chloride-type from the Piper Formation and was obtained during a
drill-stem test at a well in eastern Valley County. In MBMG's data bank, the
highest value noted for dissolved solids was 4,245 mg/L from a 4,702-foot live-
stock well in northern Rosebud County; this is a sodium sulfate type water.
The lowest dissolved-solids value of 204 mg/L was for a calcium bicarbonate type
water from a 249-foot well finished in the Morrison Formation in Judith Basin
County.
Figure 1-12 is a histogram of water analyses plotted against values of
- 57 -

-------
140-
120
100-
80'
60-
40-
20-
FIGURE — I-11 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM THE KOOTENAI AQUIFER, GREAT PLAINS
REGION, MONTANA.
-140
21
Ullllllllllllllllll
ly.v.v.vlv^
NaHCO-:
CaHCOc
CaSO/
OTHERS
(MgHCOo)
(NaS04)
(NaCl)
(MgS04)
(NaC03)
(INCLUDES 20 ANALYSES
FROM HOPKINS,1976)
"""1	1	I	1	1	fuamaaa
0 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
120
-100
CO
w
o
¦80 w
-60
-40
-20
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 58 -

-------
35-
FIGURE ~ 1-12 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM JURASSIC AQUIFERS, GREAT PLAINS
REGION, MONTANA
-35
30-
-30
25-
20-
23
15-.'
10"
NaHC03
NaSO,
-25
CaHCO-:
OTHERS
(MgHC03)
(MgS04)
(CaS04)
(NaCl)
5-

20
15
- 10
- 5
I	i	¦	¦	i	i
0 1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 59 -

-------
dissolved solids. There are too few analyses represented to distinguish
definite trends in water type. It does appear, however, that calcium
bicarbonate-group waters predominate when dissolved-solids values are less
than 1,000 mg/L.
Mississippian Aquifers
MBMG's computer file contains 37 water-quality analyses for water from
Mississippian-age rocks. These analyses represent water sources in the western
and central portions of the Great Plains region. Many of the water samples
were obtained during research on warm-water wells and springs. Figure 1-13 is
a comparison of dissolved-solids values to the number of analyses from waters
from Mississippian-age rocks. Hopkins (1976) evaluated and classified an
additional 75 waters from Mississippian-age rocks. Feltis (1980) mapped
dissolved-solids values; ratios of sulfate to total anions; and ratios of
sodium plus potassium plus chloride to dissolved-solids values from Madison
Group rocks in the Great Plains region. These references plus others represent
a wealth of information and data that has been gathered for the Madison Group
because of the high interest in the water-yielding and water-quality character-
istics of these rocks relative to their potential for industrial water develop-
ment .
The highest dissolved-solids values reported occur iji the extreme north-
eastern corner of Montana, underlying portions of Sheridan, Richland and
eastern Roosevelt counties. In this area, dissolved-solids values of 100,000
mg/L are common, and values approaching 300,000 mg/L are reported. These waters
are sodium chloride brines associated with evaporite deposits within the
Charles and Mission Canyon formations of this portion of the Williston basin.
The highest dissolved-solids value in MBMG's files is for water from the Angela
- 60 -

-------
Hot Springs well in northeastern Rosebud County which has a value of 5,919 mg/L.
This well produces a sodium calcium chloride sulfate water from well perforations
placed between 8,152 and 8,183 feet below land surface-
Waters obtained from sources near the outcrops of Mississippian-age
rocks represent the other extreme and are very much lower in dissolved solids.
The lowest dissolved-solids value noted was from rocks of the Big Snowy Group
in Fergus County. A 225-foot well completed in these rocks produced a magnesium
bicarbonate water of approximately 256 mg/L. This water is used for domestic
purposes. Figure 1-13 shows that 30 of the 37 analyses in this small group had
dissolved-solids values of less than 2,000 mg/L with calcium sulfate being the
predominant water type. Most of these analyses represent waters in or relatively
near the outcrop areas for Mississippian-age rocks.
According to Feltis (1980), anion trends closely follow increases in
dissolved-solids values. Waters with low sulfate concentrations are generally
found near outcrops, but sulfate concentrations increase rapidly even a short
distance from the outcrop. Over most of the Great Plains region, sulfate con-
centration is greater than 50% of the total anion content of the water. In
both the Williston basin and Sweetgrass Arch areas, chloride becomes the
dominant anion. In these areas, Mississippian-age rocks produce oil and gas
and have sodium plus potassium plus chloride ratios to dissolved-solids values
of greater than 50 percent.
Table 1-5 compares selected elements and ions to drinking water quality
standards published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). However,
since no standard has been established for sodium plus potassium, an arbitrary
value of 250 mg/L has been selected as a reference point.
Based on these data, ground water in the Great Plains region is often of
poorer quality than that recommended by the EPA's standards. In the eight
- 61 -

-------
33-
30-
2!r
m
w
u
z
w
PS
PS
!=>
o
u
o
ptl
o
peS
w
20-
15-
lO
FIGURE — 1-13 FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
COMPARED TO DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN WATER
FROM MISSISSIPPIAN AQUIFERS, GREAT PLAINS
REGION, MONTANA
NaHCO-:
15
15
CaSO/
OTHERS
(CaHC03)
(MgS04)
(NaCl)
(MgHC03)
(NaS04)
0
	1	1	1	1	
1001 2001 3001 4001 5001 6001 7001 8001 9001 >10000
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
DISSOLVED SOLIDS IN MG/L
- 62 -

-------
TABLE 1-5
COMPARISON OF SELECTED ELEMENTS AND IONS IN WATERS OF THE GREAT
PLAINS REGION, MONTANA TO DRINKING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS4
AQUIFER	CONSTITUENTS NUMBER OF	% GREATER	% LESS	AVERAGE
AND VALUES THAN THAN CONCENTRATION
		STANDARDS	REPORTED	 STANDARD	STANDARD	IN MG/L	
Unconsolidated
Na+K(250)1
586
55
45
734.
Deposits
Fe(.3)2
547
27
73
1.

Mn(.05)
448
51
49
1.

CI(250)2
587
6
94
61.

S04(250)2
587
80
20
3097.

N(10)3
551
14
86
13.

Ds(500)2
576
89
11
4860.
Early Tertiary
Na+K(250)1
1333
56
44
394.
Formations
Fe(.3)2
1318
20
80
,

Mn(.05)^
1278
30
70
•

Cl(250)
1330
< 1
> 99
17.

S04(250)2
1331
70
30
809.

N(10)3
1328
2
98
1.

Ds(500)2
1333
92
8
1765.
Fox Hills-Hell Creek
Na+K(250) 1
278
77
23
447.
Aquifer
Fe(.3)2
254
17
83
.

Mn(.05)2
206
17
83
•

Cl(250)2
278
2
98
35.

SO4(250)2
278
48
52
432.

N(10)3
258
< 1
> 99


Ds(500)2
262
85
15
1284.
No standard has been set.
A concentration
of 250 Mg/L has been selected
as a point of
reference.
2
Secondary drinking water
standard in Mg/L




Primary drinking water standard in Mg/L
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976

-------
TABLE 1-5 CONTINUED
COMPARISON OF SELECTED ELEMENTS AND IONS IN WATERS OF THE GREAT
PLAINS REGION, MONTANA TO DRINKING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS4
AQUIFER	CONSTITUENTS	NUMBER OF	% GREATER	% LESS	AVERAGE
AND VALUES THAN THAN CONCENTRATION
	STANDARDS	REPORTED	STANDARD	STANDARD	IN MG/L	
Judith River
Na+K(250)1
221
85
15
869.
Formation
Fe(.3)2
221
26
74


Mn(.05)
189
22
78


CI(250)2
221
26
74
284.

S04(250)2
221
65
35
1102.

N (10)
218
8
92
7.

Ds(500)2
221
96
4
2756.
Eagle-Virgelle
Na+K(250)1
93
73
27
729.
Formation
Fe(.3)
93
18
82


Mn(.05)2
89
15
85


Cl(250)2
93
19
81
357.

SO4(250)2
93
49
51
696.

N(10)3
93
3
97
1.

Ds(500)2
93
87
13
2265.
Kootenai
Na+K(250)1
130
20
80
202.
Formation
Fe(.3)2
130
46
54
1.

Mn(.05)
121
28
72


Cl(250)2
130
4
96
78.

SO4(250)2
130
22
78
156.

N(10)3
130
0
100
a

Ds(500)2
130
48
52
769.
^ No standard has been set.
A concentration
if 250 Mg/L has been selected
as a point of
reference.
^ Secondary drinking water
O
standard in Mg/L




O
Primary drinking water standard in Mg/L
^ Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976

-------
TABLE 1-5 CONTINUED
COMPARISON OF SELECTED ELEMENTS AND IONS IN WATERS OF THE GREAT
PLAINS REGION, MONTANA TO DRINKING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS4
AQUIFER
CONSTITUENTS
AND
STANDARDS
NUMBER OF
VALUES
REPORTED
% GREATER
THAN
STANDARD
% LESS "
THAN
STANDARD
AVERAGE
CONCENTRATION
IN MG/L
Jurassic Age
Formations
Mississippian Age
Formations
Fe (.
Mn(
CI
Na+K(250)^
"-'.3)2
...05)2
v.. .1.(250) 2
SO^(250)2
N(10)3
Ds(500)2
Na+K(250)1
Fe(.3)2
Mn(.05)2
Cl(250)2
SO4(250)2
N(10)3
Ds(500)2
35
34
33
35
35
35
35
37
36
35
37
37
36
37
17
44
27
3
40
0
63
19
28
26
5
68
0
81
83
56
73
97
60
100
37
81
72
74
95
32
100
19
129.
1.7
.09
64.
386.
.7
951.
171.
.8
.04
115.
739.
.2
1448.
No standard has been set. A concentration of 250 Mg/L has been selected as a point of reference.
O
Secondary drinking water standard in Mg/L
^ Primary drinking water standard in Mg/L
4 Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1976

-------
aquifer groups, 68 percent of the samples had dissolved solids concentrations
of greater than 500 mg/L; four percent of the samples had nitrate (as N) con-
centrations greater than 10 mg/L; 65 percent of the analyses reported sulfate
concentrations of greater than 250 mg/L; and eight percent of the chloride
concentrations were greater than 250 mg/L. Manganese and iron are often
greater than the standards with 27 percent and 28 percent of the reported
values, respectively, exceeding them.
Water-quality analyses for water from the Judith River aquifer quite often
report dissolved solids concentrations greater than 500 mg/L. Water analyses
from this aquifer showed 96 percent of the samples had dissolved solids con-
centrations above that recommended by the standards. Early Tertiary, Quaternary
unconsolidated and the Eagle-Virgelle aquifers followed with 92, 89 and 87
percent of their water-quality analyses reporting dissolved-solids values
above 500 mg/L. Eighty-five percent of the analyses from the Fox Hills-Hell
Creek aquifer reported dissolved solids concentrations above the recommended
standard. Kootenai, Jurassic age, and Mississippian-age aquifers produced the
best waters in our data set with less than 50 percent of their analyses report-
ing dissolved-solids values greater than 500 mg/L.
Average concentrations of elements and ions shown on Table 1-5 substantially
vary between aquifers. The highest average sodium concentration was found for
water from the Judith River aquifer with a value of 869 mg/L. The lowest
average sodium concentration of 129 mg/L is reported for water from Jurassic-
age rocks. The lower average sodium concentration in water from these rocks
could be misleading and may actually be greater because of the limited number
of analyses. Iron concentrations appear greatest in water from Jurassic-age
rocks averaging 1.7 mg/L. Lowest average iron concentrations of .04 mg/L were
found in water from Mississippian-age rocks. Manganese values varied from
- 66 -

-------
1.1 mg/L in water from unconsolidated materials to .03 mg/L in the Fox Hills-:
Hell Creek aquifer. Chloride concentrations for the region varied from 357
mg/L for water from the Eagle-Virgelle aquifer to 17 mg/L for water from that
of early Tertiary aquifers. Chloride concentrations are generally very high
in Mississippian-age rocks in the Williston Basin portion of the region where
sodium chloride brines exist. Average sulfate ion concentrations range from
3097 mg/L for waters from unconsolidated deposits to 156 mg/L for water from
rocks of the Kootenai formation. The sulfate ion concentration for the uncon-
solidated deposits is elevated in our data set as the average contains concen-
trations from a number of analyses collected during research projects on
saline-seep waters and sulfate ion concentrations in saline-seep waters often
range between 10,000 and 50,000 mg/L. Nitrate averages range from 13 mg/L in
waters from unconsolidated deposits to .2 mg/L in waters from Mississippian
rocks. High nitrate values can be characteristic of fertilized acreages and
this average probably reflects their influence.
- 67 -

-------
V. SUMMARY
1.	Eight major aquifer systems have been identified within the Great
Plains region of Montana. These are the Quaternary unconsolidated deposits;
the early Tertiary Fort Union Formation; the Fox Hills-Hell Creek, Judith
River, Eagle and the Kootenai Formations, all of Cretaceous age; the Jurassic
Swift Formation; and the Madison Group of Mississippian age. Thickness maps
(isopachs), altitude of formation (structure contours) and dissolved solids
maps have been prepared for each of these aquifers. In addition, a potentio-
metric surface map was prepared for the Madison Group. Although considerable
research has been completed to compile these maps, other parameters such as
recharge rates, ground-water flow paths, the extent of interformational mixing
and values for transmissivity and storativity are poorly known. Other data
pertaining to the hydrochemical aspects of the formations are sparse, but are
continually being accumulated.
2.	Quaternary unconsolidated aquifers include: alluvium, colluvium,
terrace deposits, eolian deposits, glacial deposits, high level gravels and
the deeply weathered surface of some sandstone formations. Unconsolidated
deposits are composed of uncompacted gravels, sands, silts and clays which can
be either sorted or unsorted. Well yields are highly variable, ranging from a
few gpm to in excess of 1,000 gpm, depending upon location. Development of
these aquifers for drinking water, irrigation and stock uses has been extensive
because shallow drilling depths allow for an easily accessible water source.
Recharge to Quaternary unconsolidated deposits takes place through direct in-
filtration of precipitation streamflow loss, upward leakage from underlying
bedrock units and irrigation return-flow.
- 68 -

-------
Dissolved-solids concentrations range between 140 mg/L for alluvial
ground waters to a high of 68,000 mg/L for ground water from saline-seep areas.
3.	Throughout the eastern half of the Great Plains region the early Fort
Union Formation is the most important source of ground water. This formation
was deposited under a variety of sedimentary processes which accounts for the
numerous lithologies present. Most of Montana's large coal reserves occur as
seams in the formation.
The Fort Union is developed extensively by shallow domestic and stockwater
wells. Ground water is obtained primarily from the sandstone units and from
the coal beds, but some water is derived from clinker. Aquifer properties are
locally unpredictable because of the widely varying lithologies. The water
quality also often reflects the changing lithologies and is therefore dependent
upon location. Well yields are typically less than 15 gpm, but a few wells
have been reported to produce 50 gpm. The shallow drilling depths and wide
geographic extent of this aquifer propogates its widespread use.
4.	Underlying the Fort Union Formation are the uppermost Cretaceous sand-
stones, siltstones and shales of the Fox Hills-Hell Creek Formations and their
equivalents. These formations form an areally extensive aquifer across most of
the Great Plains region. Hydrogeologic data for this aquifer is sparse and
therefore aquifer parameters are not definitely known. Wells penetrating the
aquifer, especially in southeastern Montana, will likely have artesian con-
ditions. The water quality is generally very good with dissolved-solids
concentrations ranging between 100 and 4400 mg/L. The water is dominantly
characterized as a sodium bicarbonate type and for this reason it is relatively
soft. These favorable conditions make the Fox Hills-Hell Creek aquifer a
preferable ground-water source of municipal and domestic wells.
- 69 -

-------
5.	From the western margin through the central part of the Great Plains
region the Judith River Formation is present as a clastic wedge (more than 700
feet thick) thinning to the east. In much of north-central Montana, the lower
part of the Judith River Formation is a fluvial deposit and includes coal seams
as much as five feet thick. In south-central Montana, the lower part of the
formation is a marine sandstone and is often designated as the Parkman Member.
Because the lithologies of the formation and their thicknesses constantly
change, regional hydrogeologic parameters are poorly known.
Well yields from the Judith River Formation range from a few gpm to
approximately 100 gpm depending upon location. In some areas, the ground water
in the aquifer is under sufficient pressure to produce flowing artesian wells.
The water quality of the aquifer is highly variable and ranges from 161 to
27,500 mg/L of dissolved solids. Seventy-four percent of the water quality
analyses have values of less than 3000 mg/L, making the water suitable for
domestic and stockwater purposes.
6.	The Eagle Formation is a primary aquifer in the northwestern part of
the Great Plains region of Montana. In central Montana the Virgelle sandstone
occurs as the basal member of the Eagle Formation. Siltstone and shale are
dominant in the eastern portion of the region where the formation is often
referred to as the Gammon Shale. Decreases in well yields can be directly
correlated progressing to the east, as the formation becomes more shaley.
Yields of 500 gpm have been reported in the Cut Bank area, but generally
average less than 50 gpm. Around central Montana, well yields range between
5 and 20 gpm. Toward the east, the formation becomes so shaley and impermeable
that it is no longer recognized as an aquifer.
- 70 -

-------
Dissolved-solids concentrations of this aquifer range from 285 to 16,000
rag/L. The higher values of dissolved solids in excess of 10,000 mg/L appear
to be related to oil and gas wells. The water quality of the Eagle Formation
is generally good; 58 percent of the analyses reviewed have values of less than
2000 mg/L. Additional hydrogeologic data is needed to evaluate the potential
of this aquifer as future demands increase withdrawals. The aquifer is
extensively used in the Great Falls area where local overdrafts already have
been reported.
7.	The basal sandstone unit of the Kootenai Formation forms the main
aquifer of this formation. The unit is referred to by numerous local names
such as the Sunburnt Sandstone, Cutbank Sandstone, Third Cat Creek Sandstone,
the Pryor Conglomerate and the Lakota Sandstone. This sandstone unit is
approximately 100 feet thick and is tapped as a ground-water source where it
occurs within 500 feet of the surface. Yields of 300 gpm have been obtained
from this aquifer, but generally average between 10 and 25 gpm. Flowing
artesian wells occur where the aquifer is under a confined condition.
This aquifer serves as the main source of ground water for many residents
in central Montana.
Water derived from this aquifer generally is of very good quality with
81 percent of the 150 analyses having dissolved-solids values of less than
1000 mg/L.
8.	The only Jurassic formation known to have sufficient water-bearing
potential to be considered an aquifer is the Swift Formation, although a few
wells are known to produce water from the Morrison and Piper Formations. The
Swift Formation is present throughout the Great Plains region of Montana
- 71 -

-------
except in the central areas of the plains mountains where it has been eroded.
Wells penetrating Jurassic-age formations usually yield small quantities
of marginal to poor quality water. Dissolved-solids concentrations vary from
204 to greater than 4000 mg/L. Use of Jurassic-age aquifers is restricted
generally to outcrop areas, where the water quality has not deteriorated sub-
stantially and is not deeply buried.
9. The Madison Group aquifer extends across the entire Great Plains
region. It is absent in only a few small areas at the center of mountain uplifts
where it has been removed by erosion or emplacement of igneous rocks. The
Madison Group is dominantly limestone, but its uppermost unit, the Charles
Formation, becomes increasingly an anhydrite with proximity to the center of
the Williston Basin. Throughout the eastern portions of the Great Plains region
the Madison Group is more than 600 feet thick, attaining a maximum thickness
in the Big Snowy Trough of central Montana. Although the Madison aquifer
appears to have excellent potential for producing large quantities of water,
costs associated with deep drilling depths have deterred extensive development.
Wells penetrating the aquifer are reported to yield from 20 gpm to in excess
of 1000 gpm. Some of the wells are under sufficient hydrologic pressures which
cause flowing artesian conditions.
In central and north-central Montana, numerous large volume springs dis-
charge from the Madison aquifer. Giant Springs flowing 300 cubic feet per
second (cfs) and Big Springs flowing 160 cfs supply the municipalities of
Great Falls and Lewistown, respectively.
The water quality of the Madison aquifer depends on the water's residence
time in the formation and distance from where the group outcrops. The lowest
- 72 -

-------
dissolved-solids value was obtained from a well close to where the Madison
Group outcrops along the Big Snowy Mountains. These waters have a dissolved-
solids value of 256 mg/L and are a magnesium bicarbonate type. The concentra-
tion of dissolved solids increases rapidly toward the Williston Basin and
attains values of approximately 100,000 mg/L, representing sodium chloride
brines. Because of the extreme variability of waters from the Madison Group,
more hydrogeologic information is needed to assess the full potential of the
aquifer.
10. A precise tabulation of ground-water use by economic sector and
aquifer source is limited by the lack of accurate withdrawal-rate data, and
for this reason figures presented in this report are estimates of water use.
However, Montana is presently quantifying its water use and consumption through
the water-right adjudication program. Both surface- and ground-water claims
shall be filed prior to April 30, 1982, and will be adjudicated after that date.
Upon completion of the adjudication filings, the State will possess a written
record of all water rights quantified according to time and volume of use.
Municipal ground-water use totals 19.06 million gallons of ground water
per day. Slightly more than three-fourths (76 percent) of the communities of
the Great Plains region rely solely upon ground water for their drinking and
household needs. Estimates show that approximately 90 percent of these water
supplies derive their water from alluvium or unconsolidated deposits.
Current estimates indicate that ground-water supplies approximately two
percent (56.68 acre-feet per day) of the water used in the Great Plains region.
Agriculture is the largest ground-water user within the region, mainly for
irrigation needs. Roughly 5.62 bgd are diverted for irrigation, of which one
percent is withdrawn from ground-water sources.

-------
The petroleum industry is the largest commercial user of ground water in
this region. Both fresh and saline ground water are withdrawn and either used
for secondary recovery purposes or as a by-product produced during primary and
secondary oil recovery. The average daily injection rate is estimated to be
approximately 15.06 mgd.
Domestic water is that which is used by people not served by a community
system, usually rural residents. There are approximately 17,000 domestic and
stockwater wells in the Great Plains region providing 95 percent of the rural
population with a potable supply.
- 74 -

-------
VI. REFERENCES CITED
Cole, G. A., Daniel, J. A., Heald, D., Fuller, and Matson, R. E., 1981.
Oil and Gas Drilling and Coal Production Summary for Montana 1981.
MBMG Open-File Report 59.
Feltis, R. D., 1980, Dissolved Solids and Ratio Maps of Water in the
Madison Group, Montana. MBMG Hydrogeologic Map 3, Montana Bureau
of Mines and Geology.
Hopkins, W., 1976, Water Resources Data for Deep Aquifers of Eastern
Montana. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-40, 37 p.
Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences (1980).
Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Oil and Gas
Division: Annual Review for the Year 1980, Oil and Gas Volume 24, 44 p.
Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Water Resources
Division, October 1976, The Framework Report, Vol. One, 101 p.
United States Bureau of Mines: 1976-present, Keystone Coal Industry Manual.
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, PH680-V-28, Montana,
1980.
United States Department of the Interior, Minerals in the Economy of Montana,
1979.
Zimmerman, E. A., 1967, WAter Resources of the Cut Bank Area, Glacier and
Toole Counties, Montana, MBMG Bulletin 60, 37 p.
Zimmerman, E. A., 1960, Preliminary Report on the Geology and Ground-Water
Resources of Northern Blaine County, Montana, MBMG Bulletin 19, 19 p.
- 75 -

-------
APPENDIX A
WELL-NUMBERING SYSTEM

-------
WELL NUMBERING SYSTEM
In this report, locations are numbered according
to geographic position within the rectangular grid
system used by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.
The location number consists of as many as 12
characters. The first three characters specify the
township and its position south of the Montana base
line. The next three characters specify the range
and its position east of the Montana principal
meridian. The next two characters are the section
number. The next three characters designate the
quarter section (160-acre tract), quarter-quarter
section (40-acre tract), and quarter-quarter-quarter
section (10-acre tract), respectively, in which the
well is located. The subdivisions of the section are
designated A, B, C and D in a counterclockwise
direction, beginning in the northeast quadrant. When
more than one well is described within a 10-acre tract,
consecutive digits are added to the well number. For
example, as shown on Figure 1-14, well 05S54E16ACC is
the first well inventoried in the SW^ SW% NE^ sec. 16,
T. 5 S., R. 54 E.
- 76 -

-------
Diagram showing wall-numbering system.
Figure 1-14
- 77 -

-------
APPENDIX B
GLOSSARY OF TERMS

-------
Acre-foot - A unit for measuring the volume of water. It is equal to the
quantity of water required to cover 1 acre to a depth of 1 foot, and
is equal to 43,560 cubic feet or 325,851 gallons.
Alluvium - A general term for clay, silt, sand and gravel deposited by
running water as sorted to semisorted sediment.
Aquifer - A formation, group of formations or part of a formation that contains
sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities
of water to wells or springs.
Arid - A climate characterized by dryness, variously defined as rainfall
insufficient for plant life or for crops without irrigation; less than
10 inches of annual rainfall.
Artesian - Artesian is synonymous with confined. Artesian water and artesian
water body are equivalent, respectively, to confined ground water and
confined water body. An artesian well is a well deriving its water from
an artesian or confined water body. The water level in an artesian well
stands above the top of the artesian water body it taps. If the water
level in an artesian well stands above the land surface, the well is a
flowing artesian well; however, an artesian well does not have to flow.
If the water level in the well stands above the water table, it indicates
that the artesian water can and probably does discharge to the unconfined
water body.
Colluvium - A general term applied to a loose heterogeneous mixture of gravels,
sands, silts and clays deposited at the base of a slope.
Dissolved-solids concentration - The total dissolved minerals in water,
expressed as the weight of minerals per unit volume of water, without
regard to the type of minerals.
Disturbed Belt - A zone roughly 25 miles wide along the eastern mountain front
which was tectonically disturbed during the formation of the Rocky
Mountains, but mountains did not develop in this zone.
Eolian deposits - Sediments whose constituents were transported by the wind
(i.e. sand dunes).
Epeirogenic uplift - Primarily vertical movements which have affected large
sections of land.
Evaporite - A sedimentary rock dominantly composed of saline minerals which
become concentrated by evaporation of a solvent.
Fluvial - Pertaining to a river.
- 78 -

-------
Histogram - A vertical bar-graph representation of a frequency distribution
in which the height of bars is proportional to frequency of occurrence
within each class interval.
Igneous extrusions - Molten magma which has been extruded onto the surface
of the earth and cooled to a rock.
Igneous intrustions - Molten magma which has been emplaced into pre-existing
rocks and cooled to a rock.
Injection well - A well into which water or other fluids are pumped for
varying purposes such as disposal, secondary oil recovery or increased
yield.
Isopoch - A line drawn on a map through points of equal thickness of a
designated stratigraphic unit.
Laramide Orogeny - A time of deformation during which the Rocky Mountains were
developed, extending from late Cretaceous until the end of the Paleocene.
Lithology - The description of rocks in hand specimen and in outcrop on the
basis of such characteristics as color, structure and mineralogic
composition.
Loess - A widespread, homogeneous, commonly nonstratified deposit of windblown
dust that is generally believed to be Pleistocene age.
Mean annual runoff - The average yearly flow from rainfall or melted snow
which ultimately reaches a surface stream.
Microthermal - Pertaining to a climate characterized by low temperature.
Moraine - A mound, ridge or other distinct accummulation of unsorted,
unstratified glacial drift, predominantly till, deposited by the action
of glacier ice in a variety of topographic land forms.
Potentiometric surface - A surface which represents the static head. As
related to an aquifer, it is defined by the levels to which water will
rise in tightly cased wells. Where the head varies appreciably with
depth in the aquifer, a potentiometric surface is meaningful only if it
describes the static head along a particular specified surface or
stratum in that aquifer. More than one potentiometric surface is then
required to describe the distribution of head. The water table is a
particular potentiometric surface.
- 79 -

-------
Saline - A general term for naturally occurring soluble salts, such as sodium
chloride, sodium carbonate, sodium nitrate, potassium salts, etc.
Sedimentary - Formed by deposition or accretion of grains or fragments of rock-
making materials. Applied to	all kinds of deposits from the waters of
streams, lakes or seas and in a more general sense to deposits of wind
and ice.
Semiarid - A type of climate in which there is slightly more precipitation
(10-20 inches or 12-16 inches) than in an arid climate, and in which
grasses are the characteristic vegetation.
Static water level - The water level of a well that is not being effected by
withdrawal of ground water.
Steppe - An extensive, treeless grassland area generally considered drier than
the prairie.
Subhumid - A climate type that is transitional between humid and subarid types
according to quantity and distribution of precipitation.
Taiga - A swampy area of coniferous forest sometimes found lying between tundra
and steppe regions.
Unconsolidated deposits - Primarily clays, silts, sands and gravels that are
loosely arranged and not cemented together.
- 80 -

-------
APPENDIX C
MONTANA WATER LAW

-------
The appropriative doctrine of water rights, "first in time, first in
right," applies exclusively in Montana. Prior to 1973, a water right was
acquired by simply making a diversion and posting notice of such diversion.
A filing was to be made in the county office, but the courts had ruled that
even this was not required. The appropriator did have to put the water to
beneficial use. The appropriation of ground water to beneficial use prior
to January 1, 1962 was recognized as a water right for the first time by the
1962 Montana Groundwater Law, but surface rights with a priority preceding
that date were given priority over all prior or subsequent ground-water rights.
The 1973 Montana Water Use Act established a uniform central system for the
acquisition, administration and determination of all water rights. It also
mandated, the adjudication of all existing rights. The appropriator is required
to file for a permit with the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation
(DNRC), to obtain a new water right if it involved construction of a new
surface water diversion or impoundment, or a water well with an anticipated
beneficial use of more than 100 gpm. The DNRC was directed to issue permits if
applicants complied with certain conditions including the requirements that:
(1)	Unappropriated waters exist which the applicant can put to beneficial
use in the amount and at the time proposed in the application.
(2)	The rights of prior appropriators will not be adversely affected.
(3)	The proposed means of diversion or construction is adequate.
Beneficial use is defined as "a use of water for the benefit of the appropriator,
other persons, or the public, including but not limited to, agricultural
(including stock water), domestic, fish and wildlife, industrial, irrigation,
mining, municipal power, and recreational uses..."
who will appoint Water Masters to review the permit applications and that each
- 81 -

-------
water judge shall study and adjudicate all water rights granted thereby. Such
judges have now been appointed and they estimate that the water rights, both
surface and ground, for which applications are filed prior to April 30, 1982,
will be adjudicated within 10 years. When this occurs, the State and its water
users will, for the first time, have a written record of all water rights, in
Montana, quantified in time and amounts of water. For a compilation on the
rules and regulations pertaining to Montana's ground water, reference should
be made to the Montana Code Annotated, Volume 13, Sections 85-2-501 through
85-2-520.
- 82 -

-------