INTERSTATE LEAD COMPANY
SUPERFUND SITE
BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
JUNE 199/
U.S. EPA, REGION IV
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
ECOLOGICAL SUPPORT BRANCH
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605
-------
Date:
June 10, 1994
To: Kim Lanterman
Resource Project Manager
From: US EPA, Region IV, Ecological Support Branch and
ESAT, Region IV, Biological Assistance Team
Document Title/Description:
Final Report on the Biological Assessment of Streams in the Vicinity of ILCO
Inc., Leeds, Alabama. June 1994.
-------
1 of 14
INTRODUCTION
This document is an update of a preliminary report on the biological assessment of streams in
the vicinity of Interstate Lead Company (ILCO) Superfund Site, Leeds, Alabama, submitted
March 31, 1994, and incorporates chemistry data on water, sediment, and fish tissue samples
which was unavailable when the preliminary report was written. Previous studies (USEPA
1993a) have shown that these streams receive runoff and contaminants from the ILCO site.
The primary contaminant of concern (COC) is lead.
OVERVIEW
During the weeks of March 6 and 13, 1994, members of the U.S. EPA Region IV,
ESD/Ecological Support Branch accompanied by the ESAT Biological Assistance Team
personnel visited the ILCO site. Following a reconnaissance of the area, six sampling
locations were selected - three on Dry Creek (stations 03, 04, and 05), two on the unnamed
tributary to Dry Creek (stations 01 and 02), and one on a small tributary to the unnamed
tributary (station 0) (see map Fig. 1). The small tributary to the unnamed stream was
selected as a reference stream. The ground-truth survey conducted during reconnaissance of
the study area revealed that this small stream receives its water from a watershed adjacent to
but not directly influenced by the ILCO site. Stations 01 and 03 were chosen as background
stations for the unnamed stream and Dry Creek respectively.
At each sampling station, in-situ water chemistry was measured and a water and sediment
sample were collected. Also, a Rapid Bioassessment Procedure (RBP) Protocol I (USEPA
1989) was conducted that included a physical characterization of the sampling location,
habitat assessment, and a benthic macroinvertebrate survey. Finally, an attempt was made to
collect fish at each station.
At the time of collection, water and sediment samples were split. At the end of each day a
portion of each sample was shipped directly from the site to appropriate laboratories for
chemical analysis. Another portion of each sample was retained by the ESAT team for
toxicity testing. Chain-of-custody was maintained throughout sampling, shipping and testing.
-------
" of 14
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
APPROXIMATE SCALE
DRY CREEK?
< in rcc r >
[ inch = <00 ft
IN Ic . —
STATE
TRUCKING
COUpAN>
ENANC
VAULT §
BAFTtrTY
OECASINC
SuriTXR
\J
Figure 1.
Stream sampling locations,
ILCO, Inc.
Leeds, Alabama
March 1994
- SAMPUNG STATION
-------
3 of 14
METHODS
In-situ Water Measurements
Dissolved Oxygen (DO), pH, temperature, and conductivity were measured using a
calibrated YSI/Grant 3800 sonde unit. Alkalinity and hardness were determined later (within
72 hrs) in the laboratory using EPA approved methods (APHA 1992).
Water and Sediment Sampling
These were conducted according to EPA standard operating procedures (USEPA 1991). At
the time of collection, each water and sediment sample was split as follows:
Water
3 - 40 ml vials with teflon septum (for volatile organics)
1 - 1 liter polyethylene bottle (for metals)
1 - 500 ml polyethylene bottle (for total organic carbon)
1-4 liter amber glass jar (for pesticides/extractables)
1-4 liter cubitainer (for toxicity testing)
Sediment
1 - 2 oz. jar with teflon septum (for volatile organics)
1 - 8 oz. jar (for metals)
1 - 8 oz. jar (for pesticides/extractables)
1 - 8 oz. jar (for total organic carbon)
1-1 liter jar (for toxicity testing)
1 - whirl pack (for sediment particle sizing)
After collection, samples were stored on wet ice.
Rapid Bioassessments
These were conducted according to EPA Rapid Bioassesment Protocols for Use in Streams
and Rivers (USEPA 1989). A representative sample of benthic organisms were preserved in
alcohol.
-------
4 of 14
Fish Collections
Fish were collected using a Smith-Root Type VII backpack electroshocking unit. Stunned
fish were collected in a decontaminated fish net, handled with latex gloves, placed in a clean
plastic bag, and placed on wet ice. Within 48 hrs of collection fish from each sampling
station were subdivided into two equal portions (one portion wrapped in plastic, the other in
aluminum foil), frozen, and then shipped to the appropriate laboratories for chemical
analysis. The species composition of each sample was noted and recorded.
Toxicity Tests
The following toxicity tests were conducted on water and sediment samples according to
EPA Region IV Ecological Support Branch standard operating procedures (USEPA 1993b):
Water samples
Fathead Minnow 7-day Chronic Test (SOP VIII)
Ceriodaphnia 7-day Survival/Reproduction Test (SOP XV)
Selenastrum capricornutum 96 hr. Growth Test (SOP XX)
Microtox® Basic Test
Sediment samples
Ceriodaphnia 7-day Whole Sediment Test (SOP XV A)
Lettuce Seed Germination Test (SOP XVIII)
Microtox Basic Test (performed on sediment pore water)
RESULTS
In-situ Water Measurements
The results of in-situ water measurements (supplemented by laboratory determinations of
water alkalinity and hardness) are summarized in Table 1.
Rapid Bioassessments
Tables 2 and 3 summarize the results for RBP's. Copies of field data sheets for each
sampling station are included in Appendix A.
-------
5 of 14
Toxicity Tests
A summary of toxicity test results are listed in Tables 4 and 5. Copies of laboratory bench
sheets for each toxicity test are included in Appendix A.
Fish Collections
Electrofishing turned up bream, largemouth bass, and several minnow species at all three
stations on Dry Creek. At station 02 on the unnamed tributary the fish collection consisted
of bream, creek chubs, and minnows. Upstream at stations 0 and 01, only a few minnows
were collected.
Chemical Analyses
The metals content of sediment and whole body fish tissue samples are summarized in Table
6. At all sampling stations the lead level in the sediments exceeds the NOAA ER-L value of
35 mg/kg (Long and Morgan 1991). The levels at stations 02 and 05 also exceed the ER-M
of 110 mg/kg. Fish from stations 02 and 05 showed greatly elevated whole body lead
burdens. The nickel level at station 04 exceeds the ER-L of 30 for nickel. However, this
appears to be only a localized "hot spot," possibly derived from drainage of a nearby coat
hanger plant.
Appendix B contains copies of the results of all chemical analyses performed on water,
sediment, and fish tissue samples.
DISCUSSION
In spite of elevated levels of lead in the water and sediments of the unnamed tributary and
elevated levels of lead in the sediments of Dry Creek, the macroinvertebrate surveys and
toxicity tests indicate no impact from site-derived contaminants on the respective aquatic
communities. According to the RBP's, both Dry Creek and its unnamed tributary, as well as
the reference stream, provide suitable habitat for aquatic macroinvertebrates. This is
reflected by the existence of a diverse assemblage of benthic macroinvertebrates as shown in
the summary lists (Table 3), and specifically by an abundance of sensitive organisms such as
stoneflies (Plecoptera), Mayflies (Ephemeroptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera) at all
sampling stations on Dry Creek and the unnamed tributary.
Toxicity test results are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Sediment and water samples taken at
sampling stations under the potential influence of site-derived contaminants (stations 02 and
05) showed no toxicity when compared to their respective background station (01 and 03
respectively). In some cases test organisms exposed to samples from these downstream
-------
6 of 14
stations seemed to do better than organisms exposed to samples from background stations and
even better than laboratory controls, i.e., they produced more young (see Ceriodaphnia water
test), grew faster (see Fathead Minnow test), or reached a greater density (see Algae test).
Oddly enough, the poorest performance is seen in some test organisms exposed to water and
sediment from the reference stream (station 0). Both Dry Creek and its unnamed tributary
supported abundant fish populations. The lack of fish in the upper reaches of the unnamed
tributary (station 01) and the reference stream (station 0) probably reflect the intermittent
nature of water flow in these sections of the watershed (see USEPA 1993a).
In short, site-derived contaminants from ILCO Inc., even though present, appear to be
having no measurable deleterious effect on aquatic communities in Dry Creek and its
unnamed tributary. However, the greatly elevated whole body lead burden in fish tissue
(Table 7) does pose a potential risk to terrestrial communities and to human health. Schmitt
et al. (1984) considered lead concentrations exceeding 0.3 mg/kg in edible fish tissue to be
hazardous to human health. The fish tissue data and levels of lead in sediment (Table 6)
clearly indicate the transport of site-derived contamination off site. How far beyond station
05 the contamination has been carried is unknown.
In order to adequately address ecological and human health concerns and the extent of site
related contaminants in Dry Creek, further evaluation of forage fish, edible fish tissue, and
sediment is recommended.
-------
7 of 14
Table 1. Water quality measurements for streams in the vicinity of ILCO, Inc., Leeds, Alabama. March 1, 1994.
Sampling
Stations
Stream Water Quality Data
In-situ Measurements
Laboratory Determinations
Temperature
(C°)
Dissolved 02
(mg/1)
PH
Conductivity
(ji mhos/cm2)
Alkalinity
Hardness
(mg/1 CaC03)
0
(reference stream)
9.0
9.0
7.3
68
18
38
01
(bkgd on unnamed
tributary)
9.2
9.4
7.7
90
29
50
02
(unnamed tributary
immediately
downstream of site)
9.2
7.4
7.5
148
44
68
03
(bkgd on Dry Creek)
9.3
8.9
7.5
142
47
74
04
(Dry Creek above
confluence with
unnamed tributary)
9.1
9.6
7.2
152
36
58
05
(Dry Creek below
confluence with
unnamed tributary)
9.1
9.6
6.5
148
41
64
-------
8 of 14
Table 2. Summary of the Habitat Assessment Evaluation for streams in the vicinity of ILCO, Inc., Leeds, Alabama. March, 1993.
Sampling
Stations
Habitat Assessment Evaluation
Score
% comparability to
background
% comparability to
reference
Comparability Assessment
To Background
To Reference
0
reference tributary
110
-
-
-
-
01
background for unnamed tributary
114
-
104
-
comparable
02
unnamed tributary
103
90
94
comparable
comparable
03
background for Dry Creek
113
-
103
comparable
comparable
04
Dry Creek upstream of confluence with
unnamed tributary
114
101
104
comparable
comparable
05
Dry Creek downstream of confluence
with unnamed tributary
110
97
100
comparable
comparable
-------
9 of 14
Table 3. Macrobenthos qualitative sample list for six stream sampling stations in the vicinity of
ILCO Inc., Leeds, Alabama. March, 1994.
Relative Abundance: R = rare (< 3) C = Common (3 -9) A = Abundant (>10) D = Dominant (> 50)
TAXON
Station 0
(reference
tributary)
Station 01
(bkgrd for
unnamed
tributary)
Station 02
(unnamed
tributary)
Station 03
(bkgrd for
Dry Creek)
Station 04
(Dry Creek
upstream of
confluence)
Station OS
(Dry Creek
downstream
of
confluence)
Porifera
Hydro zoa
Platyhelmenthes
Tubellaria
Hirundinia
Oligochaeta
C
R
C
Isopoda
C
R
R
R
Amphipoda
R
R
R
Decapoda
C
A
C
C
A
C
Gastropoda
C
c
R
R
Bivalvia
R
D
C
Anisoptera
R
D
R
R
R
R
Zygoptera
D
R
A
C
C
R
Hemiptera
Coleoptera
R
C
C
Lepidoptera
Sialidae
R
Corydalidae
R
R
Tipulidae
R
D
R
Empididae
Simuliidae
Tabanidae
Culicidae
Chironomidae
C
C
R
C
Plecoptera
A
A
C
R
C
C
Ephemeraoptera
A
A
D
D
D
A
Tricoptera
A
R
C
C
R
C
-------
10 of 14
Table 4. Summary of toxicity test results on surface water samples collected in the vicinity of ILCO Inc., Leeds, Alabama.
March, 1994.
Sample
ID #
Sampling
Location
P. promelas
7-day chronic
Ceriodaphania
7 day Chronic
96 hour
Algal
Growth
Test
(fluorometer
units)
Microtox
LC501
Adult
% Survival
avg. wt
mg/fish
Adult
Survival
Average
# Young
0
Reference tributary
72.5
0.430
9
19.6
2.80
>100
01
Background for unnamed tributary
87.5
0.445
10
23.5
3.89
>100
02
Unnamed tributary immediately
downstream of site
100
0.449
10
28.2
4.75
>100
03
Background for Dry Creek
90
0.450
9
18.3
3.09
>100
04
Dry Creek upstream of confluence
with unnamed tributary
97.5
0.550
10
29.7
3.12
>100
05
Dry Creek upstream of confluence
with unnamed tributary
97.5
0.522
10
25.5
4.44
>100
lab control
97.5
0.447
10
27.0
NT
NT
1 - LC50 values calculated from 5 minute readings.
NT - Not tested.
* - indicates that the value for this station is significantly different statistically from the value for its corresponding background station.
Note: None of the values are significantly different from background values.
-------
11 of 14
Table 5. Summary of toxicity test results on sediment samples collected in the vicinity of ILCO Inc., Leeds, Alabama. March, 1994.
Sample
ID it
Sampling
Location
Ceriodaphnia
7 day Chronic
Lettuce Seed
Germination
(% germination)
Microtox
LC501
Adult
% Survival
Average
U Young
0
reference stream
100
18.5
0.62
>100
01
bkgd on unnamed stream
100
17.1
0.70
>100
02
unnamed stream immediately downstream
of site
100
19.6
0.85
>100
03
bkgd on Dry Creek
100
21.9
0.82
>100
04
Dry Creek above confluence with
unnamed tributary
100
17.0
0.92
>100
05
Dry Creek below confluence with
unnamed tributary
100
19.9
0.93
>100
Lab. Control
100
16.2
0.87
NT
1 - LC50 values calculated from IS minute readings.
NT - not tested.
* - indicates that the value for this station is significantly different statistically from the value for its corresponding background station. Note: None
of the values are significantly different from background values.
-------
12 Of 14
Table 6. Level of metals in sediment and fish tissue, ILCO, Inc.,
Leeds, Alabama. March 1994.
Station Number
Parameter
(mg/kg)
0
Reference
Stream
1
Unnamed
Tributary
(Background)
2
Unnamed
Tributary
(Downstream
of ILCO)
3
Dry Creek
(Background)
4
Dry Creek
(Upstream of
Confluence)
5
Dry Creek
(Downsteam of
Confluence)
Aluminum
4300
7500
3900
5100
4000
4400
Antimony
20UJ
20UJ
20UJ
20UJ
20UJ
20UJ
Arsenic
4.7
5
5.7
17
6.4
10
Barium
54
99
45
50
39
43
Beryllium
0.48J
0.92J
0.31J
0.59J
1.2J
0.78J
Cadmium
1.1U
1.4J
2.7
1.3U
1.1U
2.8J
Calcium
1400
10000
11000
3100
2300
9500
Chromium
12J
26J
16J
27J
17J
18J
Cobalt
7.6
12
6.4
7.5
9.1
8.1
Copper
3.8
13
13
7
9.4
13
Iron
15000
28000
14000
26000
18000
22000
Lead
46
47
1100
48
65
870
Magnesium
260
4000
4500
1100
590
1900
Manganese
490
1100
430
440
270
550
Mercury
0.15U
0.17U
0.16U
0.17U
0.15U
0.17U
Nickel
12
26
11
14
35
17
Potassium
240
680
330
320
370
330
Selenium
0.47UJ
0.48UJ
0.48UJ
1UJ
0.50UJ
0.53UJ
Silver
1.1U
1.2U
1.1U
1.3U
1.1U
1.3U
Sodium
14U
60
44
60
52
66
Thallium
0.24U
0.24U
0.24U
0.27U
0.25U
1.0U
Vanadium
14
16
11
18
16
13
Zinc
41J
140J
62J
62J
120 J
94]
Fish (whole body)
Lead Concentration
NA
NA
11.0
1.0
0.61
3.4
J - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
J - Estimated value. NA - Not analyzed.
-------
13 of 14
Table 7. Levels of lead in water, sediment, and fish tissue samples collected in the
vicinity of ILCO Inc, Leeds, Alabama. March 1994. Data is compared to water
quality criteria (USEPA 1992) and NOAA sediment guidelines (Long & Morgan 1991).
Sampling Stations
Criteria
Media
0
1
2
3
4
5
AWQC
Maximum
Concentration
AWQC
Continuous
Concentration
NOAA
ER-L
NOAA
ER-M
Water Og/1)
25
75
140
15
4
4
33.78
1.38
-
-
Sediment (mg/kg)
46
47
1100
48
65
870
-
-
35
110
Fish, whole body
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
11.0
1.0
0.61
3.4
-
-
-
-
NA - Not analyzed.
-------
14 of 14
REFERENCES
APHA. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 18th Edition. Greenberg, A.E., L.S. Clesceri,
and A. D, Eaton, eds. American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution
Control Federation. 1015 Fifteenth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20005.
Schmitt, C. J., F. J. Dwyer, and S. E. Finger. 1984.
Bioavailability of Pb and Zn from mine tailings as indicated
by erythrocyte ^-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALA-D)
activity in suckers (Pisces: Catostomidae). Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci. 41:1030-1040.
USEPA. 1993a. Work Plan for the In-House Remedial Investigation
at the Interstate Lead Company (ILCO) Superfund Site, Leeds,
Alabama, Operable Unit #2, September 1993. U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV. Prepared by:
Environmental Services Division, Environmental Compliance
Branch, Athens, GA; and Waste Management Division, South
Superfund Remedial Branch, Atlanta, GA.
USEPA. 1993b. Region IV Ecological Support Branch Standard
Operating Procedures for Hazardous Waste Site
Investigations. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IV Environmental Services Division, Athens,
GA, and prepared by ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc.,
Environmental Services Assistance Team, Athens, GA.
USEPA. 1991. Environmental Compliance Branch Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Environmental
Services Division, College Station Road, Athens, GA 30613.
USEPA. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams
and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. 440/4-
89/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Assessment
and Watershed Protection Division, Washington, D.C.
-------
APPENDIX A
Toxicity Test Bench Sheets
Rapid Bioassessment Field Data Sheets
-------
SOP XI
Rerision No. 3
Date: March 9, 1994
Page: 14 of 14
SHORT-TERM CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST - FISH WEIGHT DATA
Industry/Study: C ® Species: p. ^ ^ u~aJloj
Location: . >Vl— Analyst: Qo*>»nc/(~ ~
Date/Time: 3/2. f/*? ^ Oven Temp/Drying Time: IPS'
Sample
ID #
Foil ft
A
Wt. of Foil
(g)
B
Wt. of Foil
& Dried
Fry (g)
B-A
Total Dry
Fry Wt. (g)
C
Number of
Fry
Weighed
(B - A)/C
Average
Dry Fry
Wt. (g)
Remarks
lU
*
C'owVr0 ^
5(?
. 0 4.547
, 00ft foo
• O 0 5 > 3
i-ic
, 00 0S1 ^
n
. 0 0 31 $
, 0 OSCYL
lo
J7
.0 0 3 -T 1
' 0 07 1) Ca
. 00 335-
to
, 0 0 o'3'^i"
ry
• 60"S>7 1
'
0 0
, O 00
0 0^ J.|
c\
,ooOt|M
33
3 v
, 0 0 34 3
1 0 0
' O 0 4 ) 2,
10
,oo^f(3
35'
. OOH OS
, 00 T} i 5'
, 0 c- 4 | O
¦I 0
• 0 0 0 4 | 0
3r
—
1
3 4,
. 0 0 2.6 S
, D(W fl' ^
O O | MS
. 0 0 0 i -7 to
36^
37
¦ c;o37^'
. 0 0 d b <0
. - O % O ^
/ 0
, 000SOS
37
33
, '¦% 7
- OS'S
¦ 0 C ^ M 1>
>C
• OOOM M 3
3'y
¦
.
• c 0 M ^ i>
! 0
1000 43 3
Vo
. 0 o'M 8
. 067^^
, L-o Ll y-\
io
, 0 0 0 4 7-1
140
U<
¦0 0 3i"3
• 0 0 / 2- ^
1 c
, 0 00 3.7^'
V z-
, c> o3S /
< oo?^
¦ ooyj 7
10
,C?6>tf 3>£7
H*-
•
°o'i ' .?,/TT'
r-OO/bT)-
,
VY
,0 0 3 34-
, 0 0 7y-j
>0 0473
- 000 M7o
U
.00 3 43
, 00 "7-7 S"
>OOHJ>2-
c
. oo04l$()
Vl 7
.C'OZtfsT
. 0 t» c^~? 7
hr ') M UJ
.00 OH34>
V7
H
M 1 >-( ^
,0 cSZC.
10
'O0(fXSo
Si
f 3
¦003H-7
CidV-lt
' 0 0 4^
-------
Section VIII
Revision No. 3
Date: March 4,1994
Page: 14 of 15
SHORT TERM CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST » FISH SURVIVAL DATA
Industry/Study: -j- C O Species: ?' h0 & j
Location: lack* A ( Analyst: IK o / c' s
Date/Time: V II
Sample ID if
and/or
Concentation
Rep.
if
Number Surviving
Remarks
Day
0-,
Is
2„
3,
4u.
5r
6f
Ts
Cmk
1
/°
1 o
1"
I 0
K
i 0
IC
2
/O
i o
1 O
f°
10
,*
0 0
lo
3
fo
IV
1 o
fl>
10
11
1 0
1 0
.4
1 0
lo
10
fu
1 0
10
10
1
/
1
ru
i e
<\
2
/ 0
> 0
(O
/t>
10
It?
fo
3
1 o
1 0
to
ft
10
1 o
10
I 0
4
1 °
> 0
io
1
0
0
0
1
1
/"
(J
7
0
1 O
10
4
/o
>0
lv
fO
10
I 0
1 0
ID
Z_
1
/ 0
/«
lo
(9
1 0
t 0
) o
I 0
2
1o
(°
(O
fc
i c;
i 0
1 o
ID
3
fo
lo
1°
(*
1 0
i <)
1 c
I 0
4
fo
\°
(°
1 o
1 0
1 0
I 0
1
/b
fo
/°
i •
*\
/ ^
1 o
to
10
1 9
I 0
10
3
/c
N
(0
1 o
°\
*1
4
/o
/©
I °
°\
c1
°[
H
1
/o
/0
\'0
1 0
I 0
1 0
lo
2
/ 0
IQ
to
l o
1 "
1 0
lo
3
/ 0
to
10
i
<1
°\
4
10
10
'0
fo
i 0
1 6
1 O
|0
¦ K\yjruK \ 7.
5
1
) 0
1 (J
to
(°
I 6
1 0
1 O
1 0
2
f D
i a .
\o
1°
1 0
) o
1 0
1 0
3
/«>
I 0
16
to
1 0
1 o
\0
lo
4
1 0
>0
1°
1
1
*1
1
-------
Section XIII
Rerision No. 3
Date: March 10, 1992
\.ll rogc: 17 or 19
SHORT-TERM CILRONIC TOXICITY TEST - WATER CHEMISTRY AND SURVIVAL DATA
Industry/Study: TuC(? Dale/Time: //'Qg /f>«v
Location: AL. Analyst: . L.yus>S~
Species: I. p r^vr. «,U
Sample ID t or Cone.
DAVW C» k4t0 1
Dny
Remarks
0
1
3
5
«F
7
# Larrae Surriring
HO
Initial
"V
V. X.
i-".*
u-u- Final
s 0
Temperature
%S.o
¦tf.o
if. <5
25".»
2»'»0
pll
*K<1
1 <\
*7
M
Alkalinity
Hardness
«?<
Conductin'ty
^0
Salinity
0
Chlorine
Sample 1U if or Cone.
51
Dny
Remarks
0
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
Of Larrae Surriring
HO
Initial
I.*1
1 d
T, O
V>8
u.u. rmai
7-H
Temperature
W
5L6 '
2-T.^
pll
c.s
C-~L
(fit's
fc-r
Alkalinity
i Y
llardneu
3*?
Conductivity
CO
Salinity
0
Chlorine
Sample ID 1 or Codc.
J
Uny
Remark]
0
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
# Larrae Surriring
4'
MO
Initial
7.*\
7>-L
W.S
5, 0
4.1
W-U- HoaJ
61-4
Temperature
W.Q
%-SO
l$.o
> o
5-f'O
pll
TV
(,5
b • c?
(e> • '*>
Alkalinity
2-9
Hardness
$0
Conductivity
C{
Salinity
o
Chlorine
Data Sheet XEQ.l
-------
Section XIII
Rerision No. 3
Date: March 10,1992
^ ^ 2^ Foge: 17 of 19
SHORT-TERM CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST - WATER CHEMISTRY AND SURVIVAL DATA
IndusU7/Study: 1L CO Date/Time: ? -£-*1V
Location: fit L. Analyst: ^ . ^-twi/
Species: P. prowtks
Sample ID / or Codc.
Day
Remarks
X
0
l
3
«j4
5
f 6
7
I Larrae Surnring
4 0
H 0
Initial
3.x
v.*
*/. V
V,2_
u-u- Final
<"l.S
7.r
Temperature
7.S-*
2 i'.O
if.o
pll
t'°!
t.u
C.C
(t' L
l«-U
Alkalinity
Hardness
Conductivity
u-u- Final
Temperature
XS.o
2jT.a
2S\0
Pn
~>.i
fc.C,
i.i
fe. U
t.*7
Alkalinity
HI
Hardness
Conductiiity
Salinity
0
Chlorine
Sample ID # or Cone.
H
Day
Remarks
0
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
# Larrae Surriring
4
1S..0
l5.>
2S.&
^5.0
pH
C.°l
t-y
(?' J»
Alkalinity
3C
Hardness
Conductivity
Ho
Salinity
0
Chlorine
Data Sheet XEH.l
-------
Section XIII
Revision No. 3
Date: March 10, 1992
Pogc: 17 of 19
SHORT-TERM CHRONIC TOXICITY TEST - WATER CHEMISTRY AND SURVIVAL DATA
Industry/Study: i_ L C.O Dale/Time: ?- £ //•. oa A k,
Location: Lat^S 4 L Analyst: A?c.~dS/.. y \ ULvJif
Species: j>.
Sample ID # or Cooc.
Day
Remarks
s
Q
1
I
3
4
s
6
7
H Larrae Surriring
l\6
'i 0
Initial
V*
Y.f
1.0
Y.
pli
~7. 1
Cr. K0
G.n
(e>. ;f
U> L>
Alkalinity
Hi
Hardness
C V
Conductivity
10
Salinity
JO
Chlorine
Sample ID / or Cone.
Dny
Remarks
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
M Larrae Surriring
Initial
u-u- Final
Temperature
pli
Alkalinity
Hardness
Conductirity
Salinity
Chlorine
Sample ID 1 or Cone.
Day
Remarks
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
/ Larrae Surriring
Initial
u-u- Final
Temperature
pli
Alkalinity
Hardness
Conductirity
Salinity
Chlorine
3
Data Sheet XHI.l
-------
Su^v-f^£ UJ
sor xv
KeTuiuu No. 4
Dole: September 10, 1993
l'age: 18 of 20
SUMMARY DATA
Industry/Study: 2
Location: t , A
lhUi::
Analyst:
l.'OO
v>"»
StxjJrnrr)
/2. Lo /¦ U>e.t'y,'cJ^
Sample /
Afld/or
CoDcrotrftilon
Keplical e
Number
of Young
Number of
Surririog
Adulti
Young per I
Adult f
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
«
9
10
C&Vv4^
0 w w
l"T
w
~
1^
u-
J"F
U'
i—
>—
c-
i
3*
s
is-
< 4
1*}
Q>
(s
(0
t
i
1 ol oJ
ri
Ol^
:¦')
?i
¦ |
l-T
; 7
r/o
' 0
^7-0
$
I
1—
t-
L"
i--"
2
•*-
v_
C—'
«-—
\—
1^--
1
--
3
is
u'
—
fc—'
*»—
—-
i—
«-
4
1i 1
*
K)
-It1
•f
J
¦?
'2
3 o
5
V '
M
v'
~
\f
1/
IX
V/
6
.'-A
^^•^/
C¦»
(a
7
v/
iVr
7
7+r
\
?¦*»
t+4-
^*¦2.
\r*i-
7tt-
L. *!
ie> *r-
TolaJ
PJ
¦ ri
7
\ 7
r;^
ri.?^
l
1
u--
<—
u--
L--
1^-"
u^"
?
w'
3
1/
*"
U—
L--
L-
--
i—
4
5"
2-
•A"
3
yj
T
Y
V^l
41-
5
~
~
J
j
V
Lr'
V
/
6
fo f /
4+U
3 b
J'f
5-»l
-
1
"
I1 :¦ |ir 1 1 10 | zj.b
1
b
4
C-^/
r r
- J
5
Ji-
1/
i/
7+ 1
~
V
Ml
7->2-
~
MO
6
ff''-'
1
/u+ 1
1
a ^
V-/
q
0
7-< 2,
5'",
7
'3*2-
'V
il
/c
' '*/
1 X*
,C^1-
/3
1? "
Total
.u
¦)?
. ¦¦
-
' /
3' "
i 0
3
I
ts'
4^
iS-
V
2
~
~"
L^-
w—
c
i--
~-
3
1—~
I'
Al
W
4
0-
*
3
~
M
*
4
3
2
1.
>k-
5
V/"
1/
M
\S
1/
i-'
1
1
6
?
ytz.
'0
i~
7
i> /
r+ /
M (9
1,0
7
II * f
Il<<
y+<
/c
S
,
' L>. J
W
I
~
c-
•-
fc-»-
\s
2
**-
u-
l*—
W
3
w
w"
—
—
4
¥
h>
f
f
i
4
5"
V
M C1
5
1/
V
1/
1/
1/'
V
V
6
-------
sor xv
IltTuiou Nu. 4
Date: Sc|i(cuibcr 10, 1993
l'ngc: 18 uf 20
SUMMARY DATA ^
Industry/Study: O Lhilc: ^ I '.oopr^
Location: Analyst: /?, t-t*. ',/, /w. UJeJ^tcJU
Sample I
and/or
CoDcrotroLiion
Kf pbcoi c
Number
of Young
Number of
Surviving
Adulla
Young p«r
A dull
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT
—
U-
t-'
w"
—
W
C-*
O H*/
I P
U-"
—
V«-
—
.-
—
3 s
C e*\4r'' 1
« s
r
J"
5"
r
V
H
S-
V
Uf\
/
1/
»/
V
v/
~
« T
L
s
?~/
/n
10
l fr
7 W>
/"/4-f
(i*i
/?>*'
I £-
/ 3-* 1
¦ }
' V
/ 2-
/i.-#
1 olal
5
/ * i .
i r,
'1
- •:
K,
T-IrO
/O
2t 1
5
1
V"
U-
*—¦
2
-
fc—'
U^~
—
3
U-
w
—-
•—
»-
*-
—
4
<4
S~
J
3"l
V
-y
«V
Y
*v
\
5
v/ •
>/
~
i/
V
4/
6
|0
/•>
X
*f-o
* 1
14-/
%
/ O
/0 M
??-
7
'3
i 341
fr\ + 2-
,? */
/n11
3+1
/ in
/is>
no
1 Otfti
>1
•>,0
*> "J
'i ),
1\
'
Y\
inr'
1 2 5". 5"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Total | |
1 1
1 1
1
2
3
4
5
<
7
Totil
1
3
3
4
5
i
7
Told
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
1 olti | | | | |
S • T«l o* X • T«t or janlim dmd t ~ Nun»hfr of H»* -4 m Numfc«t of dfv»d )uun| M • Lo*t or rnUilnj
-------
ALGAL TOXICITY TEST
EPA, ESD, TES
AUG. 1990
INDUSTRY/STUDY! /_C O
LOCATION: Lc* Ao _ A- C.
INITIAL INNOCULUM: /Q; CO>0 tSJ£> Aug
ORGANISM: ^^u—* ^ f ex-*-*u*
ANALYST: Jft-fkan-X «rC
DATE COLLECTED: 3/ / / 9 V
DATE TEST STARTED: 3/ "S / f y 7.! P*n w
SM.»-**<< I. '3°
-try, a. c-l A JlCn
. 2.*? l/J/'ilu.
SAMPLE
ID #
INITIAL
BLANK
INITIAL
READING OF
REP #1
96 HR
BLANK
96 HR
REP /I
READING
96 HR
REP #2
READING
96 HR
REP #3
READING
COMMENTS
0
^ U7
J'4-Aji.e*-^
. ObQ,
. 0 8r1
.-|Ol
1
H.^S
¦Z..3 ^
Sa-^Cs +Uf
1
. oii
.10 7
. C
'0*f J
z*-4o
H.Ho
(>.**
k . <50
J £¦—¦*— ^ Cft
C Lia-^
n
. OIO
, 0 31-
2..
S',2-3
-------
s £ "Vc is w HV Tic ^
Mic
Study: ^ I- CO Date: 7 V
Location: /—^ I— Analyst: (>J g ) ^ i^/fhac^ Jj~
Sample
Reading
Time
Cuvette Number
1
2
3
4
5
p
Initial
C1 r
to8
/O^L
°j0
5 minute
X V
~71
6 o
3j~
2,4
15 minute
7b
¦S"?
3
Initial
% s-
°\-v
°\ 3
;o 3
2 ?
5 minute
7 5"
2P k
& "2-
13
5/
15 minute
W
S3
SO
Initial
/ ° I
C)H
n
/ oo
(Oj
5 minute
^ /
HJ
<1 2-
<7 y
15 minute
°>!
8 >
<^o
<1$-
iK b'
Initial
o
* 7
H
15 minute
HI
i r
ip
$ 3
-------
CLADOCERAN SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTION DAILY RECORD
Industry/Study:
Location:
Date Sample Collected:
Date Organism Hatched:
X- uo
6-g-g
i_a_
IjJf I u- i c4~/Ij
Sample ID #
Day
Replicate
Comments
1
2
3
4
s
6
7
8
9
10
Dm oo
1 f
s
1/
C/
u'
—
—
2
5-1/
t
7
6 u)
3
!
/
V
<>
y
IS
X
7r
H
ic;
* 0
1
id
%
i
Total
IS
/fc>
21
12.
/?
\°\
n
10
Z7>
fll~
1
-
>-
<—
i
•j.
N
f
V
5
7
£
5
t
r
r
6
s
J-
^ i
1
'/ '/
1
L
r
/
X
is
7
1
M
' l
7)
-7
/
%
Total
IT
/*
iH-
18
/?
10
2d
'ft
ni
01
1
u-
L-
o
C--
c~
<—
L--
2
U-—
C"-
L--
O"
c^-
c--
3
\
l/
1/
i/
K/
i/
l.'"
i/
i/
4
H
V
7-
/
V
S"
V
\s'
L.
C.'
5
*\
IT-
W
<4M
1
7
I
V
1
7
6
if
1/
f. /
1
/
6
7
¦l "
'J
<*\
*11
lt
6
o /"
7
Total
^s
X\-
0-X
1^
03
1
v—'
(*-
c-
—
I -
2
c-
u-
c^~
<—
o-
<;—
3
I
(/
(/
y
U'
y
c-
4
2-
3
L/
¦y
V
~L
L
¦_
5
t,
-------
SOP XV
ReTLsion No. 4
Dale: September 10,1993
Page: 18 or 20
SUMMARY DATA
Industry/Study: LC * Dale: J*- /— *7 V
Location: 4-l. Analyst: /Pf, ,h tcL /lUa.u
Sample 9
And/or
Concent riiion
KcpUcali
Number
of Young
Number of
Surviving
A dulls
Young per
Aduli
1
2
3
4
.5
6
7
8
9
10
i
—
-
2
~
ty
\y
~
\s"
~
—
3
--
L-
't
7-
V
p-
oS
4
V
7>
X
'f-
JL
I
i/
;
L--
v/
5
?
£
I
?
•7
n
c
7
"7
6
H
1
>s
f 1
to
r
j
A
7
1
7
H
-------
Section XVIII
Revision No. 3
Dole: November 19, 1993
l'nge: 13 of 18
SEED GERMINATION DATA
Industry/Study: XlHo- Analyst:
Location: , Au Start (Date-Time): 3Hlc'M £5-;)
Species: IW^-^fiuuriL LStop (Date-Time): £l&j!)
Sample ID ti or
Concentration
Rep.
H
it Seeds
Planted
H Seeds
Germinated
Proportion
Genninated
Remarks
(ZoivWo^
1
if
l\
ni
2
if
^-4-4= / <4
Av 1 $7
3
if
13
,r?
4
if
/*
0
r
1 i
.GO
2
IS
S
.S3
(XO ^ l»\ • ^2»
3
if
IO
. ** ^Cvrv-v <70
4
if
\0
. L7
J
1
1
if
l^
.go
f 1 U 1/0 ' Sc—
2
if
If
1.00
i "7
3
if
IO
¦ t /
CuA
4
if
,v^
J
3
1
if
IT-
.so
2
if
.i>0
3
lb
l*
.tl
CtO- &<\LHvy\
4
If
JS
•V
1
lb
13
.HI
$ocUs. clc*-~v ,
2
1 b
is
( .0°
d ^jurbu/" rcvo t-v. Cx>t 0 V
3
1 f
13
M, r^tjww\ £-
4
If
IH-
ic')3
Figure XVI1I.1
-------
Section XVIII
Reruion No. 3
Date: Norember 19,1993
Page: 13 or 18
SEED GERMINATION DATA
Industry/Study: 7. L?s>. Analyst: U,lOLe.tWi Stop (Date-Time):
Sample ID H or
Concentration
Rep.
a
H Seeds
Planted
ff Seeds
Germinated
Proportion
Germinated
Remarks
5"
1
1ST
IV
.cll
2
/if
If
) .o"
bvcurvN 14. I 4-
3
)'f
n
v (, >•>« .
4
If
13
OJQ. °l ?
2
3
4
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Figure XVI1I.1
-------
(po fie w
Microtox Data Sheet
Study: //Yjfl Date: 31 g | Q «-f
Location: L-uA*. , flt. Analyst: ^ u! / J
Sample
Reading
Time
Cuvette Number
1
2
3
4
5
Initial
9 >
6
3 r
z. -v
PoTe LOoie^,
0
Initial
KS
-77
5 minute
%%
7? 1
m
<7 <7
n%
15 minute
yj-
lo
79
7
15 minute
7 3
7/
7"2-
t> o
pi/T^c vjcltiK
2,
Initial
n
*7o
~-
H
Initial
8 l
J>
>Z_
5 minute
C» J
6> J
15 minute
cT
(o 3
6
-------
Quality Assurance Data
for Toxicity Tests
-------
INITIAL WATER CHEMISTRY
Industry/Study: Icq Date(s) Collected: ~ Analyst: /Z.
Location: Date(s) Analyzed: ? - *L - ^ V
d«c. im
Sample ff
Concentration
(%)
Temperature
(°Q
D.O.
(mg/L)
Conductivity
(^mhos)
pH
Alkalinity
(mg/L CaCOJ
Hardness
(mg/L CaCO,)
Salinity
(%o)
Chlorine
(mg/L)
Remarks
fi>v? 6?
//.J£
60
/. 5
/$
"T/
s.l-
//.<£/
is
7-V
X *1
£
7 o S i_
^.¦7
CK}$
¥Lf
L%
O
/VS
-?./
n
74
o
7W ^
*/. *
/f.lC
) 66
0
tl.3%
10
*?./
v r
i V
£)/K?
-x&s
n-
"7.*?
*7 2-
/ °j L
0
-------
SEED BATCH GERMINATION
Industry/Study: Q Analyst: M> tO-iu y i'
Location: . Start (Date-Time): 3/7
Species: LHfuce^ Stop (Date-Tinie): 3hilm
Seed Batch
Rep.
H
A Seeds
Tested
# Seeds
Genninntcd
Proportion
Germinated
Remarks
Park
'/2.
poLjxe^- p>a.f kxi
ttVO cLoJrt)
1
10
¦ fIO
h5 ffeArvC oU"? I*-*— i y -
2
10
*
.so (
^¦0. GPVh^ *3*7'$ A>
3
|0
%
1
•SO
J
4
10
)t>
/ .00
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
-------
Industry/Study:
Location:
Sample ID #:
Analyst:
>v I
/ S" * /
Organism Type:
Organism Age:
Organism Fed?
Aerated?
9 i o
< T_ t-l L*. <
h ^
Concen-
tration
(%)
Rep
/ Lire Organisms
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Temperature (°C)
PII
Alkalinity
(mg/L)
Hardness
(mg/L)
Conductivity
Otmbos/cm)
Salinity
(**»)
Chlorine
(mg/L)
0
24
48
96
0
24
48
96
0
24
48
96
rfn
1
£
0
O
S-G
^-1
1.1'
V
<*¦/
72.
• 3
2
0
a
AJ>L
3
0
0
4
5
0
o
1
5
0
6
2
s
0
0
3
5"
0
0
4
5
0
0
$C0
ffr"
Q
o
0
1-1-
W
-7V
^ £
\0oo
2
S
0
0
3
s
o
0
4
5
0
6
1
5
1
f-f
2
£
f
H
3
S
6
4
5
I
Jl.*
1
5
r
,5
t-T-
13
7.7
16
?sr
2
5
s
teTL
-cTL.
3
5
5
%
4
s
S
C' \
1
S
5
s
r.v
tf-«f
7-f
no.\
TC*<
»«7C
0 w
2
5
s
5
£X<-
/en.
3
5
5
S"
4
5"
5
5
Comments:
-------
Section XII
Revision No. 3
Date: March 7,1994
Page: 11 of 11
ACUTE FISH STATIC TOXICITY TEST DATA
Industry/Study: Q A ~ Start (Date-Time): JOf). Organism Type:
Location: Stop (Date-Time): ?>- lo / o ft. Organism Age: ^
Sample ID #: Chamber Size: / S~0 >~J . Organism Fed? hj>
Analyst: O— Sample Volume: /oo . Aerated? no
Concen-
tration (%)
Rep
# Live Organisms
Dissolved Oxygen
/ (mg/L)
Temperature
(°C)
PH
Alkalinity
(mg/L)
Hardness
(mg/L)
Conductivity
(/imhos/cm)
Salinity
(%«)
Chlorine
(mg/L)
0
24
48
96
0
24
48
96
0
24
48
96
O
1
lo
S
?
n%
n.t
22->
70-
ISO
2
/o
10
lo
10
ISO
1
to
1 0
1 o
10
2
>0
10
to
f 0
^00
1
10
3
-------
JL C o
Rapid Bloassessment Protocol I
3/// /-? /
Blosurvoy Field Data Sheet
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphylon 0 2 3
Filamentous Algae j^) 1 2 3
Macrophytes 0 1 3
Sllmoa
Macrolnvorlcbrotes
Flail
( °;
0
0
1
1
(b
4
4
0 = Absent/Not Observed
1 - Rare
2 - Common
3 - AbimJlanl
4 « Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(lndlciU Rtlitlvt Abund«nc« n - Rir», C - Common, A - Abundint, D - Domln»nl)
Porlfera
Anlsoplera R
Chlronomldae
H is
Zygoptera ^
Plecoptera f\ {2-)
Pi. jlmlnthw
Hemtptera
Ephemeroptera /\ (_ |
TUrbellarla
Coleoptera
THchoptern )
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoptera
IT
Other
Ollgochaeta CZ.
Slalldae
l3opoda O
Corydalldae
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldno ^
Decapoda O
Empldldae
Gastropoda
Slmullldae
Blvalvla
Tabanldae
Cullcldoe
Rare<3 Common 3-9 Abundanl>lO Dominant > 50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Slioet for ujo with Rapid Bioai je jjmont Protocol I.
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMENT FIELD DATA SHBBT
Nana o{ Hater Bnrlv 0 irt. Hit ft Station *_
Date ^// ^ / Investigator
Connenta (fit (-& ji ^ « ~l. 50* rubble,gravel,
aubaerged logs,
undercut banka.or
other stable habitat
i'1 18-20
30-50* rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
dealrable.
6-10
<10X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat is obvious.
0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS
Oravel,cobble, and
boulder are <25*
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
iU> 16-20
Oravel.cobble, and
boulder are 25-50X
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
11-15
Gravel.cobble, and
boulder are 50-75%
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
6-10
Gravel,cobble, and
boulder are >75X
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
0-5
3. <= 5 CFS
Cold; > 2 cfs
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfs
0.5 cfa
Hare; >5 cfs
2-6 cfs
vl-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
lA 11-16
6-10
0-5
OR
• i
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/a),deep
3 of 4 habitata
2 of 4 habitata
Doalnated by one
(>0.5a);slou,shallow
present. (Hissing
present. (Missing
velocity/depth
(<0.5a);fast(>0.3a/s)
riffles or runs
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deep; fast,ahallou
get lower score than
lower score.)
pool).
habitata all present
alas ing pools) .
18-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
4. CHAHNBL
ALTSRAT108
Little / no enlarge-
aent of island* or
point bare, and/or
no channe1laatlon
12-15
Soae new increase in
bar loraation.aostly
froa coarao gravel;
and/or soae channel-
liation preeent.
8-11
Moderate deposition
of nen gravel,coarse
aand on old and nan
bars;pools partially
filled w/ailt;and/or
eabankaents on both
banlca .
4-7
Heavy deposits of
tine aaterial, bar
developaent increase
Host pools filled v/
ailt;»nd/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOOR1NG
AHD
DKP0SIT10H
<5X of bottoa
affected.
14
12-15
6-30X affected.Soour
at constrictions and
steep grades. Soke
deposition in pools.
8-11
30-50X affeoted. >50X bottoa changing
Deposit and scour at nearly year long,
obitruotlons, bends, Pools absent due to
and constriotlons. deposition. Only
8oae filling of pools large rocks exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIFFLE
RAT10»«
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
and pools.
12-16
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occassional >25. Essentially a
In pools and riffles riffle or bend.Bottoa straight streaa. Flat
Bends provide habitat provide aoas habitat vater or shallow
Poor habitat.
\ 8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BAHK
STABILITY
Stable. Ho erosion
or baok failure.Side
slopes <30X.
8-10
Moderately stable
Infrequent erosion
aostly healed over.
Side slopes to 40X.
6-8
Moderately unstable.
Moderate erosion and
aids slopes to 80X.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-5
Unstable. Many eroded
areas. 6ide slopes
>60%. "Ran" areas
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
8. BAHK >80X of streaabank 50-79X covered by 25-4BX covered by <25% covered by
VEGETATIVE covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or
STABILITY or boulders and larger aaterlal. larger aaterial. larger aaterial.
cobbles.
°\ 8-10 6-8 3-6 0-2
9. STRBAMSIDE Doalnant vegetation
COVKR la shrub
0-10
Doalnant vegetation
ia of tree fora.
1
6-8
Doalnant vegetation
la graae or forbes.
3-5
>50X no vegetation
Doalnant aaterial is
soil,rock, bridge
aaterials,culverts,or
nine tailings.
0-2
COLUMH TOTALS
SCORE 1 I 0
_£o
-------
MILD DATA SHKZT
- L CO
tV// / f y
HTSIOU. CXJUUkC7UIZXATZO«
iimijui ion/r»«T»tjLH rcxru»ra
rc«doaia4at Iacrouadl«{ Ua4 tf««t
riald/Paatara^ Agricultural
i A 1
LaciI v«t«rib«d Croaita: / ioq«
25L.
Katia«t-
~•loclty
Partly opao
\-*V
<,cC,
Iaduatrial
Ot b • r
¦o tvldtAca
t•ti¦«t«d StrDapthi llfflo
0«a fr«a«at; Taa
rtctlr Shaded (^Ibsded
Obvious Jourcit
Bud ' I m Fool
Chaaaoliaad: Tai
3
*
l*dla«al Odori i lornl
(—' ^
1 a d i a a a t 0 11 • 1 ^Ab a a a t j
Mod• r a t a
$ avduat F«c
Cb * a 1 c a 1
t r o t u a o
Ka ••roblc
V.
fadlaaot Dapoalta: Slud^v livduat Pap«r rtbac
An tb« uodaraidaa of ito.«i which in aot d««ply aafc>dd«d black?
Iworqaolc 1»b«tf>t« Co»pc»«Q(i
l«i I Ct Iba 1 I «
>• r *5 AT"
lub«( nt> yyp<
t • C C a D t
Coayaaltlaa
la f *ap1 I a q 1r0a
B • d c oc k
Cabbi•
0 f a » a t
iiaJ
lilt
Clay
-;cio
(10 la.) 9
- (2.5-M la.) —
(0.1-1-5 I.. | _ 0^
> D(.«
H-2U
2-i4-a
I . 0 4-J.00-.« (Vrl
. 00 4 -. I < - a a
< . 00 4 -a_a | 1 li cM
21 'i.
Orq Ic Subit rtt • Co*pon«nt «
Jubat rit • T fp a
Oatrltvii
Huck-Mud
71* C 1
Ckarictirlitlc
II 1 ck 1 , Wood,
Coirn F I a o t
n» t • r 1 a I I (cronJ
I I 1 c k , ~ a r 7 r1o«
omiqIc ( r ro* i
QfY . J b a 1 1
/ a r c a a t
C««9«1Ul«t
I > Xf««
WAT X1 QUALITT
1
S ^ c oinoivtd o 1 ri.a !O. \ jp P« Coaductlvlty go Otb*r
Iaat t\ia»ot 1 a ) U»ad
Krtia Typa: Coldwatar Varavatar
Water Odora: lofa« I Sawa^a fatrolau* CbaaLcal Othar
Vatar 3u(ftc« O/la: Slick Ibaao Cloba rlacka ^aa»j
Turbidity! Claar Ml i^btTy Turbl & Turbid Opaqua Vatar Color
WIAT8CB CONDITIONS
photoobahi nunoti
J, j O^A.V.
3, H Pelt 2
-------
[ r. (vCif.SK,
S-hzM' OTs-)
-it
S -V-o V\4_ $rl f €- 5 & ^2. 5 p.")
1^ ( - •'''/(I *p)
J-^ ''q Z%f>.
Cycl^&u. i
77 j? u /!da.e_ I
2 *<.£,„ c-, 5 ' /' v
' ' \ '
U^-p1' dop^T^. I
-------
Rapid Bloossessment Protocol I
Blosurvey Field Dota Shoot
SfL Cc2>
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
0 (Ti 2 3
<§P 1 2 3
0 2 3
Perlphyton
Filamentous Algae
MBCrophytes
Slimes C-OSs 1 2
Macrolnvertebrates 0 1 2
Fish 0 (£) 2
3 4
3 CD
0 » Absent/Not Observed
1 - Rare
2 - Common
3 - Abunu«nl
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(lndlcil« Rtlillvi A6und«r>c« R - n«ri, C - Common, A - Vkbundint, D - Domlntnl)
Porlfera
Anlsoptera
Chlronomldae
izoa
Zygoptera
Plecoptera Q ( z. sf)
nelmlnlhes
Hsmlptera
Ephemaroptera pf (Is-p)
TUrbellarla
Coleoptera
Trlchoplern ( / if> J
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoptera
Other
Ollgochaeta (^.
Slalldae
Isopoda
)
Corydalldae R.
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldae ^
Decapoda A
Empldldae
Gastropoda
Slmullldae
Blvalvla
Tabonldae
Cullcldoe
Rare <3 Common 3-9 Abundant >10 Dominant >50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shoot (or ujo with Rapid Bioajjesjmont Protocol I.
-------
HAbllAI AbbtbbMBNI ribLU UATA 5HKBT L £ &
i» c trv-ot-Lc Station i O I
Wane of Water Body tA.v\ K i*i *••—¦<-A C \r>~<-a-L< Station i O f
Date y / & / ^ H I n v«d t If a tor \ <— I lid f Ip-M /C.G.
12 <-¦—- U H I— Jt 60X rubble,grave 1,
30-50X rubble,grave 1
10-30X rubble,gravel
<10X rubble,gravel
SUBSTRATE/
submerged Ion,
or other stable
or other stable
or other stable
AVAILABLE
undercut banks.or
habitat.
habitat. Habitat
habitat. Lack of
COVER
other stable habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat la obvious.
18-20
desirable.
11-15
0
1
CD
0-5
2. EMBEDDED-
~ rave 1¦cobble, and
Gravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
Gravel,cobble, and
NESS
boulder are <25X
boulder are 25-60X
boulder are 50-75X
boulder are >75X
surrounded by fine
ourrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
sedlBent.
sedlaent.
sedlaent.
[<& 16"20
11-15
0-10
0-5
3. <= 5 CFS
Cold; > 2 cfs
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfs
0.5 cfs
Hara; >5 cfs
2-5 cfs
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
11-16
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/s),deep
3 of 4 habitata
2 of 4 habitats
DoBlnated by one
( >0. 5a)", slow, shallow
preaent. (Hlsalng
present. (Hissing
velocity/depth
(<0.5a); fbbt(> 0.3b/b)
riffles or runs
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deepi fast,shallow
get lower score than
loner score.)
pool).
habitata all present
aiaaing pools).
18-20
!:r n-16
6-10
0-5
4. CHANH8L
ALTERATION
Little / no enlarge-
¦ent of lalanda or
point bare, and/or
no channelisation
\"b
12-15
Soae nau increase In
bar foraatlon.aostly
froa coarse travel;
and/or ion cbannel-
liatlon preaent.
8-11
Moderate deposition
of nan gravel,coarse
eand on old and nan
bsrs;pools partially
filled w/ailt;and/or
eabankaenta on both
banka.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine Material, bar
development increase
Host pool* tilled w/
sllt;and/or extensive
channelisation.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOOR1HO
AND
DEP0SIT10H
< 5X of botto»
affected.
12-15
6-30X aff«oted . floour
at oonatrlet lone and
steep gradea. Soae
deposition in poola.
8-11
30-60* affected.
Depoalt and scour at
obstructions, bends,
and coDStriatlons,
>50X bottoa changing
nearly rear long.
Pools absent due to
deposition. Only
Soae fllllni of poola larce rocks exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BKND,
POOL/RIFFLK
RATIO**
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
and poola.
12-16
7-16. Adequate dapth 16-25. Occassional >25. Essentially a
In pools and riffles riffle or bend.Bottoa straight streaa. Flat
Bends provide habitat provide aoae habitat aster or shallow
Poor habitat.
\\ 8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BAHR
STABILITY
Stable. No erosion
or bank failure.Side
slopes <30X.
B -10
Moderately stable
Infrequent erosion
¦ostly healed over.
9ide slopes to 40V
8 ...
Moderately unstable.
Moderate erosion and
•id* slopes to 60%.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-5
Unstable. Many eroded
areas. 8ide slopes
>80X. "Raw" areas
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
8. BANK > BOX of etreaabank 50-79X covered by 25-49X covered by <25X covered by
VBGETATIVR covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel oi
STABILITY or boulders and larger aaterial. larger Material. larger Material.
_ cobblea.
Cf 9-10 6-B 3-6 0-2
9. STREAMSIDE Dominant vegetation
COVER ia ehrub
9-10
Doainant vegetation
la of tree fora.
8
8-8
Doainant vegetation
is graaa or forbes.
3-6
>50X no vegetation
Doninant Material is
soll.rock, bridge
¦aterials.culverts,oi
nine tailings.
0-2
COLUMH TOTALS
SCORE /
M 2-
-------
5VU*oh ^
P-^p J+ Ct>r- -
L
I Z I ' ' . ,
cUJi-oi_ - f
r /n • .
^ ' Jj
c^j v-y- /
¦h7>k iJ
/cb^ ^ *4 ¦'/
-------
rSTJZCAL .JAJLACTItlXATU /VAfI* gUALZTT
fZXLO DATA SHXKT
Xcco
FBTSZCAXf CimCTUlUrXM
linilJLJi IQMC/IWfTBCAK PlXTtfltl
PcvdotiatBt l«rrousdla| Uad Oitx
foraat fUU/Pait«r« A^ricultaril
Locil Vataribvd lroai«a: Ioo«
Local Vataribad IPS Follutioai
latiaatad ltff«a Width ^ a .EatlaaCad Strtaa Dapthi BlfMa
¦o avid«aca
Obvloua Sourcn
Partly Op** ^fartly aliadad^) sbadad
5
¦(
Otha c
+T
a Fool
Cbaooaliiad: Taa
1 CDtHIlT/IUHTlATt!
ladlaaal Odora: lorail
Jadlaaat Oilai ^Xb a • a t
fadlaaot Dapoalta: Jludja
Stwaf• P«tr«l«ua Cbtilcal
11 1 Hod«r*t« Frofuaa
livduit Np«r ftb«r Saad
i vblch in aot d«*plf aataddad black?
JLa a • r o b 1 c
1« l 1CC Sba1 1 a
olc )«bilr•t• Co aptainti
Igbit fata Typa
Ivdrock
lavldar
C a b b I •
(2 r a ~ a I
S a a «i
lilt
ci«r
f • c c • a t
Co ap a a 1 t 1 • a
la I a ap 1 1o ^ if»>
^ 2o°1o
>2)4-as (10 la.)
i i - J (2.3-10 la.)
2-1 4-aa I • . I - J . 3 la.) _ ^
• . 0 <- J.01-mm (fr111r ) ?
.00<-.M-aa P lOTo
(,00<-i
(•lick)
Orvailc Jubit nit Co ¦ p o n • n t i
lubitr a C • Trp•
0*1 r I Ua
Muck-Nu4
*a r 1
: 1 c
flicki. W.od,
Coin* M tot
Hat•r i a 1i (CfO* I
I t ict , T•f y flai
Orpolc | rfom
Gray, Shall
fraqaaaCa
t • t c • a t
CoapoaItloa
la 5 a ap1 1 a q Xf«a
I CO '7
o
wuru QUALITT
(JO
r. R\ c Dlaaolvad Oiyf«a ICc° p« Coadu cl 1 v 1 ty Otbar
:(a J Ui«d ^ ^co
Itraaa Typa: Coldwatar Vtrivitar
Vitar OdorlI lofai1 Fatrolaua Cbaalcal
Malar jur(lea O/la: Slick Ibaaa Cloba flacha
(3
Turbldltyt Claar Qlll^htly TwcbldT^ Tutbld Opaqua Watat Color
WCA7IC1 C0«DITI0B3
FHOTOOBAFM HUHBC1
£ lis) I
-------
Rapid Bloassessment Protocol I
Blo8urvey Field Data Shool
J Ixs-V-t. O
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 2 3 4 Slimes 0 12 3 4
Filamentous Algae 1 2 3 4 Maerolnvertobrataa 0 1 (Jp 3 4
Macrophytes 1 2 3 4 Fish 0 1 CT) 3 4
0 » Absent/Not Observed 1 - Rare 2-Common 3 - Abundant 4 - Dominant
MACRO BENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST (Indicate Rtlillvt Abundinc* R • R«r», C - Common, A - Abundint, D - Dominant)
Porlfeni
Anlsoptera [?.
Chlronomldaa C. ( 2. rp)
'zoa
Zygoptera ^
Plecoptera (2-jj)
lelmlnthes
Hemlptern
Ephomaroptem £>
TLirbeilarla
Coleoptera
THchoptera
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoplera
Othor
Ollgochaeta
Slalldae
Isopoda
Corydalldao
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldao
Decapoda C,
Empldldse
Gastropoda Q,
Slmullldae
Blvalvla
Tabanldae
Cullcldoe
Rare <3 Common 3-9 Abundant >10 Dominant > 50 (Estimate)
Observations .
^ fW-O oi-AT'—. UvA &-/Lc (/"&-•-» U* cL
/\_P^_ V V V xVA I ^ t- ^ ^ ^
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shoet (or u»o with Rapid Bioai jc jjmont Protocol I.
-------
Kama of Hater Body
Pate -3/ 16 I V
HABITAT ASStSSMEHT FIELD DATA SHEET
C^L.* If
UV>vfl
Station «.
t< ,
OT_
Concents.
Tp
Inveatlaator t jj ^
=t_^u cSJi t*^*V j.
*J~C I
fv^^Vc^ IT Lc a
if
fc
CATEGORIES
HABITAT
PARAMETER
EXCELLEHT
OOOD
FAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
>50* rubble,grave 1,
30-50* rubble.gravel
10-30* rubble,gravel
<10* rubble.gravel
SUBSTRATE/
subaerged logs,
or other atable
or other stable
or other stable
AVAILABLE
undercut banks,or
habitat.
habitat. Habitat
hsbltat. Lack of
COVER
other atable habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat is obvious.
16-20
deairable.
11-15
6-10
0-5
2. EHBEDDKD-
~ravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
HESS
boulder are <25*
boulder are 25-60*
boulder are 50-75*
boulder are >75*
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
aedlaent.
sedlnent.
aedlaent.
sediaent.
(g 16-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
3. <5 5 CFS
Cold; > 2 cfa
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfa
0.5 cfs
Mara; >5 cfs
2-6 cfs
1-2 cfa
1 cfs
r\D
10-20
11-16
6-10
0-5
Un
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/s),deep
3 of 4 hsbltats
2 of 4 habitats
Doainated by one
(>0.5a);»lou,shallow
present. (Missing
present. (Missing
velocity/depth
( <0 . 5a)i fas t{> 0.3a/s )
riffles or runs
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deep; fast,ehallou
get lower score than
loner score.)
pool).
habitata all present
¦issing pools).
16-20
i-jS 11-16
6-10
0-5
4. CHAHHEL
ALTSRATIOH
Little / no enlarge-
aent of islanda or
point bare, and/or
no channelisation
12-15
Soae neu increase in
bar foraatlon.Bostly
froa coirig gravel;
and/or iot« channel-
liatlon present.
n
8-11
Moderate deposition
of new grave1,coarse
•and on old and new
bar«;pool* partially
filled w/alltjand/or
eabankaents on both
banka.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine aaterlal, bar
developaent Increase
Host poola filled w/
allt;and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOORIHO
AHD
DBP0S1T10H
<5* of bottoi
affectad.
\b
12-15
6-30* affected.Boour
at constrictions and
steep grades. Soae
depoaition in pools.
8-11
30-60* affected.
Deposit and scour at
obstructions, bends,
and constrictions.
>50X bottoa changing
nearly rear long.
Pools absent due to
deposition. Only
Soae filling of pools large rocks exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIFFLE
RATIO**
5-T. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
and poola.
12-16
7-16. Adequate depth 16-25. Occaailonal >25. Essentially a
In pools and riffles riffle or bend.Bottoa straight atreaa. Flat
Bends proride habitat provide aoae habitat water or ahallo*
Poor habitat.
D
8-11
4-7
0-3
7. BAHK
STABILITY
Stable. Ho eroaloo
or bank failure.Side
slopes <30*.
B-10
Moderately atable
Infrequent eroalon
aoatly healed over.
Side alopea to 40*.
6-8
Moderately unstable. Unstable. Many eroded
Moderate erosion and areas. 8ide slopes
side alopea to 60*.
High eroalon durin*
high t).om.
3-6
>60*. "Raw" aress
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
8. BAHK >80* of etreaabank 50-79* covered by 25-49* covered by <25* covered by
VBGETATIVB covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or
STABILITY or boulders and larger aaterlal. larger Material. larger aaterlal.
cobbles. J~1
B-10 I 6-8 3-5 0-2
9. STRBAMS1DB Doainant vegetation
COVER la shrub
9-10
Doainant vegetation
ia of tree fora.
6
6-8
Doainant vegetation
is graaa or forbes.
3-5
>60* no vegetation
Doainant aaterlal la
soil,rock, bridge
raterlale.culverts,or
Bine tailings.
0-2
C0LUM8 TOTALS
SCORE I0J>
s.L
±r
_r
-------
JUkcmiAAriui ;ati* guxLixi
rZKLD DATA SHCKT
JpLc o o
3//0/fX
riTIXCAI. GUJULCTUZIATXMI
¦ ioMc/r»iT»ijm rKxrtmta
Jradoaiaaat l«rtouadli| Uad tfiti
rocait •»t«r» Agricultural
Local tf«t«rihad Krsilta: Von* ~ f1
Local tfatarahad >M follutloa:
Kitia«t«d i(r««a Width
tf 1 gb Vatcr Mark
<4' .
UiT
To locity
ra rt ly Opaa
loduat rial
Oth* r
m .Jatlaatad Stnaa Dopthr Blffl
Fool
Chida«11 a ad: Ta •
i^i-
Caaopy Coveri Op*a
S CDIHtlT/IUHTIATI I
Sadlaaat Odors: loraal Savaga f«trol«ua Cb«aical
l*dia«at 011a:£b^ Slight Nadtrat* Profu««
f«dla«ot D*po*lta: 9ludf« l«vduat Fip«c fiber Jaad
kt • tha undcflldai of Ko^n which aca ao( damply ••t»d4«d black?
fnor 9«olc 5ibiU>t< Coap»>m( i
A-O aaroblc
1* I 1 ct tb«1 1 i
T • • . I o J
Igbitr*(> Typi
ladrock
• •«• 1 J« r
C«bbl•
Or1
laaJ
flit
Clar
Olnatar
Coapot U1
la liap1 1og k rm•
- 1GLn<
I « . l-l . 1 la.] 'I „-j
> lH-mm 110 1 ¦ • I ~
K-DI-m 13.5-1* la. )— ^0L~lo
.00 «- . «4-i
<.404 - (click)
Or^nlc iubi t r 11 * Co«pon»nti
Jubit r i t •
Try «
I c
0«(r ltui
Ruck - Hud
Hi r 1
Ctlcka, Wood.
Citti* M«ol
Kitiriala (C>0*)
11 « c t , T«ry no*
0 r 1 a a Ic ( TfOH)
0 r • 7 , 3 b • I I
r • f c • a t
Co spa il(lea
ta 5 up li A r < i
o7e
*kTil QUXLITT
Taaparatira
[A3-
Iait r«aa«ot ( ¦ ) Uaad
OUaol v«d Oiyi«a J fi
p. ^ Y5~
Caaducl 1 * Uy
ft?
P. /
Strata Typa: Coldwalar V*
tfatar Odori : lorxl lawi^a
Hatar Surfaca O/la:
Turbidltyi Claar
Patrolaua
Slick Sbaao Cloba
Slightly Turbid Turbid
ChaalcaI
rlacka
O p aqua
loo* 0 t h «
V o a a
Va tar Color
VXATHtl CONDITION
fHOT0a»XfM BUHBI1 2L *) 0*4
-------
Q T
pu^7. im r/u- mi h .,, ^
¦—¦'^~Z~- fli !~i-fl'; |".' ' - >"" J f'.' Jpj
O^KIA* e*.-v «-C^-T'-«_ ^ ( I I ¦ *7 },„ !
'^<''j ^ £"^7 ~~ I C>_* Ni //
/ ''
P -/ ( > **
J f ^ '>v^ ^ /, \/iX — ¦* / / '' ' ¦,
J- M O-j^- ¦ fy-A vrr.'C^/
(/'
-------
Ttco
Rapid Bloassessment Protocol I
Blosurvey Field Dnta Sheet
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 2 3
Filamentous Algao (^> 1 2 3
Macrophytes 0 2 3
Slimes 0
Macrolnvortobratea 0
Fish 0
2 3 4
J 3 ©
2 XZ> 4
0 » Absent/Not Observed
1 ¦ Rare
2 » Common
3 - Abundant
4 - Domlnint
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(lndlc«t« R«I«llv« W>undinc« R - Rir», C » Common, A - Abundint, D - Domlnint)
Porlfern
Anlsoptera R.
Chlronomldaa C*
l" '^ozoa
Zygoptera C- ( ~
Plecoptera P. f I v )
ielmlnthe«
Hemlptera
Ephemeroptera "D Cb*t>)
Tbrbellarla
_ 1 *. U' * 1 - 1 * *1 \
Coleoptera C. L u-v.Pl 10 Dominant > 50 (Estimate)
Observations
(Z ) C. VtiU. - '.( r)
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shaat for ujo with Rapid Bioajieument Protocol I.
-------
HABITAT ASSESS ME IIT FIELD DATA SHEET
Hano of Water Body J) V~^ t Station *
¦3 / ( ^ / Investigator X-.j C«-y ^Co—ft •
fh 11 3 I br<. I 1
Pa te
Concents
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATEGORIES
EXCELLEHT
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>50X rubble,grare 1,
submerged loia,
undercut banks.or
other stable habitat
18-20
30-50X rubble,grave 1
or other stable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30* rubble,(ravel
or other atable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
desirable.
8-10
<10X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat is obvious.
0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS
Qrevel.cobble, and
boulder are <25%
surrounded by fine
sedlaent,
\C^ 18-20
Qravel.cobble, and
boulder are 25-50X
surrounded by fine
sediment.
11-15
Qravel.cobble, and
boulder are 50-75X
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
6-10
Qravel.cobble, and
boulder are >75X
surrounded by fine
sediment.
0-5
3. <= 5 CFS
Cold; > 2 cfs
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfs
0.5 cfs
Hare; >5 cfs
2-6 cfs
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 n/a),deep
3 of 4 habitats
2 of 4 hsbltsts
Dominated by one
(>0.5a) ;alow,shallow
preaent. (Mlaaing
preaent. (Hissing
velocity/depth
(<0.5m);fsit(>0.3m/a)
riffles or runs
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deep; fast,shallow
get lowsr score than
lousr score.)
pool).
habitats all present
¦laslng poole).
16"20
11-16
8-10
0-5
4. CHANHBL
ALTERATIOH
Little / no enlarge-
ment of islands or
point bare, and/or
no channeIllation
2>
12-15
Sob* new increase In
bar formation,Boat 1.7
froa coarse gravel;
and/or some channel-
laation present.
8-11
Moderate deposition
of n«» gravel,coarse
Bind on old and new
bsrs;pools partially
filled */sllt;and/or
embankments on both
banks.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine saterial, bar
development Increase
Host pools filled u/
silt",and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
<5X of bottom
5-30X affected.Soour
30
-50X affected.
>50X bottom changing
SCOORIHO
affected.
at oonstrictlons and
Depo
ait and i
scour at
nearly year Ion*.
AMD
steep grades. Soae
obst
motions
, bends,
Pools absent due to
DEPOSITION
deposition In pools.
and
coDStriotlons.
deposition. Only
. \
Some
filling
of pools
lsrfe rocks exposed.
12-15
8-11
4-7
0-3
6. RUH/BKHD,
POOL/RIFFLE
RATIO**
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep rlfflaa
and pools.
1"X_
12-15
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occaaaional >25. Essentially a
in pools and rifflea riffle or bend.Bottom straight stream. Flat
Bends provide habitat provide soae habitat nater or shallow
Poor habitat.
8-11 4-7
0-3
7. BAHK
STABILITY
Stable. Ho erosloD
or bank failure.Side
slopes <30*.
9-10
Hoderately stable
Infrequent erosion
mostly healed over.
Side alopea to 40X.
a
e-B
Moderately unstable.
Moderate erosion and
side slopes to SOX.
High erosion durin*
high flow.
3-5
Unstable. Many eroded
areas. Side elopes
>60*. "Raw" areas
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
8. BAHK >80X of atreaabank 50-79X covered by 25-4SX covered by <25X covered by
VEGETATIVE covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, (ravel or vegetation, gravel or
STABILITY or boulders and larger material. larger Material. larger aaterial.
cobbles .
9-10 8-8 3-5 0-2
j n.
9. STREAMSIDE Dominant vegetation
COVER ie shrub
9- 10
Doalnant vegstatlon
la of tree form.
0-8
Doalnant vegetation
la grase or forbes.
. <)
3-5
>50X no vefetation
Doalnant aaterial le
soil,rock, bridge
sate rials,culverts,or
sine tailings.
0-2
COLUMH TOTALS
SCORE I \ ?)
LQ1_
n.
X.
-------
tBTJXCAL CXAJUCriai2ATX0tf/VA?St QUALXTT
TltL0 DATA SMCS**
vaiszcAi. amauzuriM
> X > AHIAJI KOMt/I»ST»tA* rtATV»tJ
fradoaloaat Jarrouadlaj Uad o««(
rocut f Uld/mtQf* Afrlettlt«tl\ l»»ld»atiil CoaatcciAl
Local v«t«rab«d Kroalia: Nod«rat«
Local Watorabad l?S 7ollutioat Vo ovldaaca
latlaatad Itraaa Width 1 *^Sf Eatlaatad Jtraaa Dopth ftlfflo H"S
ML- Valaclty i Daa Too lo
Factly Opoo Factly Skadad Sbadad
idoat1 a 1
tfoavy
c
Iadua
Soaa Fotoatlal lourcaa
Ob v 1 c
¦lgb Wator Nark
fool
otb* r
Zh fT.
Cbaaaollaod: T«a
Caao9T Covaci ^Qpoa
ICOI HI BT/S UHT1 ATI!
Sadlaaat Odor a( Hotmal
ft odlaon t Oila:
f«dlaaot Oapoalta: Jludfo
^Aba «»^)
Sava q•
S 1 i 9*t
Hod* r•t•
Ch •a 1c a 1
frtfuia
Ao a•r o b I c
C-
lawdu¦C
fip«r fIb•r
3 a a d
i)
Ballet Sb« 1 1 ft
An tba uadvraldaa of ito^aa vblcb ara sot da«ply «at >d4*d black?
foof^aolc l«b»Uat< Co»p«i«nt 1
o J
lubatrat*
Typ<
•«d(ock
l«« 1 J« r
C o b 5 I •
Q r « * a I
S ft a J
flit
Cla T
» J 3 4 -aa (10 la. )
44-n<-»« ( 2 . 3-10 la. )
2-H-mm (0.1-1.3 la.)
•.0<-i.00~»« (frltty)
.00 4-.14-aa
< . 00 1-u (.lick) ^ 3
t•c c aa t
Co ap a• 1 t 1 • a
la Ifpl lo^ 1 r • a
1c Tc
Of^ilc lubfttrftt* Co»pon«nti
Ruck-Hud
«irl
CW rtct >f 1 it 1c
flick*. v«od,
Csiri* M *o(.
• r 1 ft 1 a ( CTOn)
Slict, r.ry f1 a «
o r * 10t c < rto*i
Q r • y . 3 b • 1 1
rri'ji.ot a
t • t c fta t
Coapoiltloa
la I • • p I 1 a <;
/ 0 e '7a
VAT11 QUALITT
D-0 c 01 aaoNtd Oayf «a / C % 3 5? P* ^ Conductivity 111 otb«r 1/ 1
I a 11 cuaaot ( a ) Uaad ^^^^—____________
Straaa Typo: Coldvatar Waravatar
Wai«c Odora: loraal |«waf a r«trol«ua cb««lcal tfooa Othir
Matar Jurfaca O/la: Slick Jhaoa Cloba flacka Koaa
Turbldltyi Claar lllfbtly Turbid Turbid Opaquo W*t•r Color
VXAT1EI COMDITION9
FHOTOOl AFIf HUKBXS
-------
Rapid Bloassessment Protocol I
Blosurvey Field Dnto Shoot
JL CO
5" iA. l~l, O
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 (T)
Filamentous Algae (fp 1
Macrophytes 0 1
2
3
A
Slimes
0
1
2
3
4
2
3
A
Macrolnvertobrates
0
1
2
3
a>
G>
3
4
Fish
0
1
2
(3
4
0 - Absent/Not Observed
1 - Rare
2 - Common
3 - Abi/Yidant
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST (Indicate R»litiv» Abund«nc» n - R«r», C - Common, A - Abundini, D - Dominant)
Porlfera
Anlsoptera
Chlronomldao ^
~' '-ozoa
Zygoptera (f~
Plocoptera
lelmlnthes
Memlptera
Ephemeroptera
TUrbellarla
Coleoptera Q,
Trlchoptera
Hlmdlnea
Lepldoptera
Other I 1 K
Ollgochaeta
Slalldae
Isopoda
Corydalldae
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldae
Decapoda f\
Empldldae
Gastropoda R, (jk*
Slmullldae
Blvalvla t>
Tabanldae
Cullcldae
Rare <3 Common 3-9 Abundant >10 Dominant >50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Biojurvey Field Data Sheet for uto v/ith Rapid Bioaijejjmont Protocol I.
-------
nrVDllAI AJJCOOIIftlll Cl&LU UMA bdfcfcl
Wane of Vatar Body C KCt ^— Station « ^ ^
Date /15* V Investigator J-/"
Concente i-, fl.(g.C-j u.y -uerv-_ t » t,1
xl Co j.-fe ,u*h ,^UP~)
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATEOORIBS
BXCELLEHT
OOOD
fAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS
3. 5 CFS
4. CHAHNBL
ALTERATION
6. BOTTOM
SCOORIHO
AHD
DEPOSITIOH
>50* rubble,(ravel,
eubaerged logs,
undercut banka.or
other stable habitat
11 .*22?.
30-50* rubble,I rave 1
or other atable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30X rubble,gravel
or other atable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
dealrable.
6-10
<10X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat is obvious.
0-5
Orave1.cobble, and
boulder are <25*
surrounded by fine
eedlaent.
\% (16-20.
Orave1,cobble, and
boulder are 25-50*
surrounded by fine
eedleont.
11-16
Orayel.cobble, and
boulder are 50-75X
surrounded by fine
sedlaent.
6-10
Qravel.cobble, and
boulder are >75%
surrounded br fine
sedlaent.
0-5
Cold; > 2 cfs
Mara; >5 cfs
10-20
Slow (<0.3 ¦/•).deep
(> 0.5a);eiow,shallow
(<0.5a);faat(>0.3a/e)
deep) fast,shallow
habitats all present
18-20
1-2 cfs
2-5 cfs
0.5-1 cfs
*¦ 1-2 cfs
11-16 6-10
0.5 cfs
1 cfs
0-5
3 of 4 habitats
present. (Hissing
riffles or runs
get lover score than
Biasing pools
\50* bottoa changing
Deposit and scour at nearly year long,
obstructions, bends, Pools absent due to
and constriotions . deposition. Only
Boae filling of pools large rocks exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIIfLK
RATIO**
5-7. Variety of
habitat.I>eep riffles
and poola.
)3
12-15
7-16. Adequate depth 15-25. Occassional >25. Essentially a
in pools and riffles riffle or bend.Bottoa straight streaa. Flat
Rends provide habitat provide soae habitat vater or shallow
Poor habitat.
8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BAHK
STABILITY
Stable. No erosion Moderately stable Hoderately unstable. Unstable. Many eroded
or b&sk failure.Bide
slopes <30*.
9-10
Infrequent erosion
aostly healed over.
Side a lopes to 40*.
%
Moderate erosion and
side slopes to 60X.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-5
areas. Side slopes
>60X. "Raw" areas
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
8. BAHK >80X of streaabank 50-7BX covered by 25-49* covered by <25X covered by
VEGETATIVE covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, (ravel or vegetation, gravel or
STABILITY or boulders and larger aaterlal. larger Material. larger asterial.
cobbles.
9-10 6-8 3-5 0-2
9. STREAHSIDB Dominant vegetation
COVBR is shrub
Doalnant vegetation
is of tree fora.
Doalnant vegetation
is grass or forbes.
>50% no vegetation
Doalnant asterial is
COLUHH TOTALS
SCORE 1 1 'j
il-y
3o
-------
riXLO DATA. SHEXT
XLtO £>b«d Iroilti i^iloat^ Nodanta
Local Vitaribid ITS Tollutloni lo tTidaaca
Eatiaatad Itriaa Vldth ^ q^Eatlaatad Jtr«*« Dapthi llfMa
Ioduitriil
M««Ty
CE
loaa Totaatlal Joarcia
ObvUua Sourcaa
Iub AiL» Fool
Oth.c
\Vk .
¦ lgb Water Hack
Canapy Cavar t <£>
ICO tHIlT/IUHTlATI |
Sadiaaat Odori: loraal
Sadiaaat 0 11a: ^^bm~a^Tt^
Sadlaaot Dapoalts: Jludga
Y.iocitr \j£]*c. D«a f rt««ot: T«a *o ^ Ghana* 11 t«d; Taa lo
Partly Opaa Tartly Skadad Sbadad
Java^i pttrolaua
Slight Mod tlkta
favduat T a pa r
Cbailcal
frefuu
^"laadi
JLa aaroblc
c
1 a I 1 c t Iballa
Ira tba uodaraldaa of ito^ai vbicb an aot da«ply aat>dd»d black?
fnor^aolc l»b«tf>t« Coapaaaata
(77)
S u b a t rata
TTP«
fa(C4Qt
Coapai1t1t«
la l>apl la^ Uti
ladrock
¦ a* 1 da r
Cabbla
<3 ( a v a I
Saiii
Silt
Clay
> 2*<~«
<10 lm . »
<4-J5<-a- (2.3-10 la.)
2 - <<-*• (4.1-2.1 I a . J
• . 0 i - J . 0 • - aaa (frltty)j
.00 4-.!(•«>
<.004 - a~* tailed)
.f^o
<-e Olo
Of^ialc lubitf»t< Coipon»nti
lubatrata Typa
Oatrltui
Rucl-RMd
*a t 1
Chif«ct >r 1 «t 1 c
stick*, v.od.
Coin* f 1 i o t.
natarlili (C70*I
llicl , T•r y fI a *
O r 5 a a i c ( ffOfl)
O r • y . 1 b • I 1
t • i c • a I
Caapotitloa
I i S a > p 1 1 a 9 A t s •
/ccT0
VATCft QUALITT
Taipara t a r • 10.6 c Oiaiolvad Oiyfaa Id.bd p« Caaductlvlty I DCo Otbar
[«uat ( ¦ I U««a H ^ % C/Q
Strata Typa: Coldwatar Varavatar
Valat Odori : lotaiI Sawaga fatrolaua CbaalcaI loo« Other
Witar Jurfaca 0/la: Slick Shaaa Cloba flacka
Tutbldltyt Cl«»t Tmbl^ Turbid Ojmju. w»t«i Color
WIATBIM CO«DITIO»J ^ Ccro'
-------
, / . £_a W /i
S 0 <-( ^ c cjy { . ; I
1 h'
(fiU 1 ^ '
\T 0 (f Sy)
"PV-i t>-v e-. I -v<--^ (7^^
' ^ ^ J I
(J/^-^^-Kl*- 1 (Lc^ A ' VtiX ( [£ f \ . I
1/1'tv 0 ^ o^l • . ' , f
tf J
II
)' I
I-C^c f p^[ AA. Y~ f ^ -) — |
-------
a i n ~h\-vyij p^^ (--Co
f\rcc'J fftovrM 4- Ck-^/h/ 'IS "%/>, £ Ac
CT^se ch 0<£ A/A
c~ / i~f{of a (f L o -// c — o j /VV*> n 4
& I / j i ^ l\ a. ~~h* / (/.\ *~h/ ft •- ¦) d6 ^ Qlx, f0 r\ 0 M/d at
i j \\ i h . Ei [AS ( Ct,vi* &¦ d°- } 0(>'~^C ^A> dp. (/
L&w^r
/-r sPUci ^Uj L c^r i> a- / tk (^Orf)
' //
ol FL
ffdfu* Jbf't j-bks t* pQtxis v-
e-c// o^v/ Q Z^C (mQ.t)
^0 t 7^ ]3Q ^ f//""
-------
XLC*
O S~
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol I
Blosurvey Field Data Sheet
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 2 3
Filamentous Algae (JP1 12 3
Macrophytes 0 1 3
Sllmoa 0 1
Macrolnverlobrales 0 1
Flah 0 1
3 4
3 CX>
4
0 «• Absent/Not Obaarved
1 ¦ Rare
2 » Common
3 - Abi>ndant
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LISTfirvdic.t. flti.Uvt At>und «nc» R - R»r«, C - Common, A - Abundirrt, 0 » Oomlninl)
Porlfera
Anlaoptera p.
Chlronomldaa CL,
" 'tizoa
Zygoptera
Plocoptera 0 if }
helmlnthea
Hemlptera
Ephemaroptera (3> *p)
TUrbellarla
Coleoptera
THchoptara Q, (7-!^)
Hlmdlnea
Lepldoptera
Othor
Ollgocheeta
Slalldae
Isopoda
Corydalldae
Amphlpoda
TIpulldBe li.
Decapods
Empldldae
Gastropoda p
Slmullldae
Blvalvla Q,
Tabanldae
Cullcldne
Rare <3 Common 3-9 Abundant >10 Dominant > 50 (Eillmate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Sheet (or uio with Rapid Dioaijejjmont Protocol I.
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMENT FIELD DATA SIIBBT
Dane of Hater Body (D h ^ 0 V gf L- Station »
Date 2-/3-8 / *? ¥ Investigator / A*AH. J J" (¦**7 /~^y~
CnB«n>nta /OO ' Wg m t—<> —C—um.L-.
CATEGORIES
HABITAT
PARAMETER
EXCELLENT
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>50X rubble.gravel,
submerged loss,
undercut banks,or
other stable habitat
/^- <^nTTir>
30-10* rubble,grave 1
or other stable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
desirable.
6-10
<10X rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat is obvious.
0-5
2. EMBEDDED-
HESS
Oravel.cobble, and
boulder are <25X
surrounded by fine
sediment.
(Q 18-20
Gravel,oobble, and
boulder are 25-50X
surrounded by fine
sediment.
11-15
Orsvel.cobble, and
boulder are 50-75%
surrounded by fine
sediment.
6-10
Oravel.cobble, and
boulder are >75X
surrounded by fine
sediment.
0-5
3. <= 5 CFS
OR
>5 CFS
Cold; > 2 cfa
Harm; >5 cfs
10-20
1-2 cfs
2-6 cfs
11-16
0.5-1 cfs
1-2 cfs
6-10
0.5 cfs
1 cfs
0-5
Slow (<0.3 n/a ) ,deep
3 of 4 habitats
2 of 4 habitats
Dominated by one
( >0.5m)islow,shallou
(<0.5m);faet(>0.3m/s)
deep; fast.ahallou
habitats mil present
;_fc.
preaent. (Hlaaing
rifflea or runa
let lower acore than
miaa ing poo la).
11-15
present. (Hissing
rifflea/runa set
loner (core.)
6-10
velocity/depth
category (usually
pool).
0-5
4. CHANHBL
ALTERATIOH
Little / no enlarge-
ment of Islands or
point bars, and/or
no channelisation
I3T
12-15
Some new lncreaae In
bar formation,mostly
from coarse gravel;
and/or aoie channel-
isation preaent.
0-11
Moderate deposition
of new gravel,coarae
sand on old and new
bars;pools partially
filled w/allt;and/or
embankments on both
banks.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine material, bar
development Increase
Host pools filled w/
silt;and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOORIHQ
AHD
DEPOSITIOH
<5X of bottom
affected.
/ 3
12-15
5-30X affected.Soour
at oonatrlctlons and
steep grade*. Some
deposition in pools.
8-11
30-60% affeoted.
Deposit and scour at
obstructions, bends,
and coDstrlotlons.
>50X bottoa changing
nearly year long.
Pools abseDt due to
deposition. Only
Some filling of pools large rocks exposed.
0-3
4-7
6. RUH/BKHD,
POOL/RIULK
RATIO**
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
and pools.
12-15
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occassional >25. Essentially a
in pools and riffles riffle or bend.Bottom straight stream. Flat
Bends provide habitat provide some habitat water or shallow
Poor habitat.
[O 8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BANK
STABILITY
Stable. Ho erosion
or bank failure.Side
slopes <30X.
Moderately stable
Infrequent eroalon
mostly healed over.
Side slopes to 40X.
Moderately unstable. Unstable. Many eroded
Moderate erosion and areas. Side slopes
0-10 2
6-B
side slopes to BOX.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-5
>60%. "Raw" areas
frequent on straight
and (vends.
0-2
6. BANK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>80% of streambank 50-79X covered by 25-40X covered by <25% covered by
covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation. gravel or vegetation, gravel or
or boulders and larger material. larger material. larger material,
cobbles.
O 9-10 6-8 3-5 0-2
J.
STRBAMS1DS Dominant vegetation
COVER is shrub
B- 10
Zt'
Boslnant vegetation
la of tree form.
6-8
Dominant vegetation
is grass or forbes.
3-5
>50% no vegetation
Dominant material is
soli,rock, bridge
materia Is. culverts,or
mine tailings.
0-2
COLUHH TOTALS
SCORE 11 0
JfL
-------
fJXLO DATA, SMXXT
J7«- C O
utn. O S~
tiTixot f^jigmuTioi
¦ ifahaji iQMi/niTicm fmmn
fr*d«ain«at larrouodla| Uad tfiat
foraat rl«ld/Paatora Agricultural
Local Watarabad Kroaiaa: loo*
Local Watarabad IFS Pollutions
Coaaa rc 1 a 1
Sha dad
KitiaaCad ltr«aa Vldtb 3 * Katia«t*d 3 t r • a a Dapt b i air / i a ( r lua m Fool
¦ lfb Wat«r Hark J m *alocity _____ 0*a fraaaoti Taa lo v/^ Cbanaallaad: Taa
Cioapf Cava t I farCly Opa*
IIP IHfT/IUIITIATI t
Sadlaaat Odorat (lorn
l«dla«ot Ollat Cktft
O t y m
S I i flbt
S»dla«at Dapoalta: SUd^t
Ara tba uodaraidaa of ato^n vbicb a(a aot daaply aat>dd«d black?
rnorq«otc Sabatrata Co»p»««nt »
-------
APPENDIX B
Chemical Analyses
-------
FILE
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
~ ~~~~MEMORANDUM"' *****
DATE: 04/22/94
SUBJECT: Results of Metals Analysis;
9^-0316 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 8318D
FROM: Charles K. Hooper
Chief, laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: BILL EOKEY
Attached art the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you havi any questions please contact me.
AT
TACKKENT
-------
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
.se Number: 21694
project Number: 94-0316
Site: Ilco. Leeds. A1
Element
A. Water
Pb, Se, T1
Ca, Mg
Cd
Sb
Pb
B. Soil
Pb, Se, T1
Cd
Sb
Pb
Sb
Se
Zn
Be
Cr
Cd
Flag
Samples Affected
Reason
U All positives > IDL, but
< CRDL
U All positives > IDL, but
< 10X contaminant level
JN All positives with Fe
concentrations in solution
> 120,000 ug/L
J All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All by ICP with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
U All positives > IDL, but
< CRDL
JN All positives with Fe
concentrations in solution
> 120,000 ug/L
J All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All by ICP with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All
J All
J All positives
J All
J All
J MDGW82 & 83
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
Suspected positive interference
as noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Baseline instability
Suspected positive interference
as noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Matrix spike recovery - 62.5%
Matrix spike recovery = 61.5%
Matrix spike recovery = 156.2%
Matrix duplicate RPD ¦= 65.5%
Matrix duplicate RPD = 85.4%
% CV > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYi .NAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
^2/94
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316
•» SOURCE: ILCO
»» STATION ID: O
»» CASE NUMBER: 21694
» 9
SAMPLE NO. 84150 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: GW75
Uli/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Ulj/L
11000
ALUMINUM
470
MANGANESE
53U
ANTIMONY-
0.20U
MERCl'P.Y
4U
ARSENIC
26
NICKEL
72
BARIUM
2100
POTASSIUM
1U
BERYLLIUM
2U
SELENIUM
5U
CADMIUM
5U
SILVER
11000
CALCIUM
1600
SODIUM
25
CHROMIUM
1U
THALLIUM
21
16
COBALT . ,
COPPER AL-
log, C.A - -S. v-9-
NA
37
TIN
VANADIUM
24000
IRON
110
ZINC
25
LEAD
2200
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
**'REMARKS***
**'REMARKS**»
«•'FOOTNOTES*»»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYS aNAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV LJU, ATHENS. GA.
*!2/94
* *
* •
* *
• *
* *
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 1
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84149 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1015 STOP:
MD NUMBER: GW74
00/00/00
UG/L
18000
ALUMINUM
531)
ANTIMONY
3U
ARSENIC
140
BARIUM
1U
BERYLLIUM
5U
CADMIUM
35000
CALCIUM
29
CHROMIUM
21
COBALT
23
COPPER
41000
IRON
75
LEAD
12000
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
A<_
UG/L
1400
0 54
43
2600
30
5U
1900
NA
42
270
1U
MANGANESE/
MERCURY 3
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULIS
»»»REMARKS»»»
»»'REMARKS'»*
**'FOOTNOTES**«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
'K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSI AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
CK. _*/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84148 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
SOURCE: ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
STATION ID: 2 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER: MD NUMBER: GW73
3200
53U
21)
42
1U
5U
110/L
24000
8U
10U
8U
76000
140
5300
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER -
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•P- l uJO
C.< i-1
v..
UG/L
210
MANGANESE
0. 20IJ
MERCURY
i5U
NICKEL
1600
POTASSIUM
2U
SELENIUM
5U
SILVER
3800
SODIUM
1U
THALLIUM
NA
TIN
9U
VANADIUM
110
ZINC
ANALYT 1 i.AL RESULTS
••~REMARKS***
**»REMARKS***
••~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALVS. JAGEMtNT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS, GA. L- _2/94
METALS DATA REPORT
»* PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SAMPLE NO. 84147 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: P MEYER »»
»• SOURCE: II CO
CITY: LEEDS
ST: AL »•
~« STATION ID: 3
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94
0945 STOP: 00/00/00 «~
* •
• »
»• CASE NUMBER: 21694
* *
SAS NUMBER:
MD NUMBER: GW72
Ub/L ANAL Y I 1CAL KESHLIb UG/L ANAL Y I I I..AL REbULTS
860
ALUMINUM
81
MAMGAMESC
53U
ANTIMONY
0 20U
MERCURY
611
ARSENIC
15U
NICKEL
27
BARIUM
1600
POTASSIUM
1U
BERYLLIUM
2U
SELENIUM
5U
CADMIUM
5U
SILVER
22000
CALCIUM
13000
SODIUM
8U
CHROMIUM
1U
THALLIUM
10U
COBALT
NA
TIN
8U
COPPER
9U
VANADIUM
1600
IRON
29
ZINC
15
LEAD
3800
MAGNESIUM
»*»REMARKS»»» »»»REMARKS»»*
*«*FOOTNOTES»*»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYS NAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV - ATHENS, GA.
.2/94
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316
*« SOURCE: JLCO
»» STATION ID: 4
** CASE NUMBER: 21694
• *
SAMPLE NO. 84146 SAMPLE TYPE. SURFACEWA
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0845 STOP:
MD NUMBER: 6W71
00/00/00
Uti/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
HO/L
300
ALUMINUM
S2
MANGANESE
53U
AMTIMOMY
O.'.'OU
MERCURY
1U
ARSENIC
150
NICKEL
19
BARIUM
1500
POTASSIUM
1U
BERYLLIUM
2U
SELENIUM
5U
CADMIUM
5U
SILVER
18000
CALCIUM
6400
SODIUM
8U
CHROMIUM
1U
THALLIUM
10U
COBALT
NA
TIN
8U
COPPER
7. to-
9U
VANADIUM
720
IRON
14
ZINC
4
LEAD
3500
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL NESUL1S
«•'REMARKS'»»
'"REMARKS'"
• "FOOTNOTES'"
'A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
'K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYS
EPA-REGION IV
NAGEMENT SYSTEM
. ATHENS. GA.
.2/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 5
CASE NUMBER. 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84145 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFWTR
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0810 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: GW70
* t 1 I 1
III)/ L
ANALY 1 11.AL RESULTS
Uij/L
220
ALUMINUM
67
MANGANESE
53U
ANTIMONY
0.20U
MERCURY
Hi
ARSENIC
15U
NICKEL
18
BARIUM
1200
POTASSIUM
1U
BERYLLIUM
2U
SELENIUM
5U
CADMIUM
5U
SILVER
18000
CALCIUM
4600
SODIUM
8U
CHROMIUM
1U
THALLIUM
10U
COBALT
NA
TIN
8U
COPPER
9U
VANADIUM
660
IRON
17
ZINC
4
LEAD
3500
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESUL1'
»»»REMARKS»»*
»»»REMARKS»»»
»»'FOOTNOTES*»»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALVI *NAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
. Z2/9A
~» PROJECT NO. 94-0316
*» SOURCE: ILCO
~« STATION ID. 0
»» CASE NUMBER: 21694
* *
SAMPLE NO. 84151 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1430 STOP:
MD NUMBER: GW77
00/00/00
Mli/Kb
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•4300
ALUMINUM
490
MANGANESE
20UJ
ANTIMONY
O 15U
MERCURY
4 7
ARStMIC
12
NICKEL
54
BARIUM
240
POTASSIUM
0.48 J
BERYLLIUM
0.4/UJ
SELENIUM
1 . 1U
CADMIUM'
1 . 1U
SILVER -
1400
CALCIUM
14U
SODIUM
12J
CHROMIUM
0.24U
THALLIUM
7.6
COBALT
NA
TIN
3.8
COPPER
14
VANADIUM
15000
IRON
41J
ZINC
46
LEAD
33
PERCENT MOISTURE
260
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
**»REMARKS»»*
**»REMARKS»»»
»»*FOOTNOTES»*«
»A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
• R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALY ANAGEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
,22/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 1
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84155 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY. P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1655 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: GW82
mi.; /kg
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
7500
ALUMINUM
1100
20 UJ
ANTIMONY
0. 17U
5
ARSENIC
26
99 i
BARIUM
680
0.92 J
BERYLLIUM
0.48UJ
1 4J
CADMIUM
1,2U
10000
CALCIUM
60
26J
CHROMIUM
0.24U
12
COBALT
NA
13
COPPER
16
28000
IRON
140 J
47
LEAD
40
4000
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
ANALY111 AL NESUI IS
»*'REMARKS***
~••REMARKS'**
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALY. -XNAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
22/94
*» PROJECT NO. 94-0316
»» SOURCE: ILCO
~* STATION ID. 2
*» CASE NUMBER. 21694
* *
SAMPLE NO. 84154 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
MIj/KG
3300
20IJ 1
5 7
45
0.3KI
2.7
11000
16J
6.4
13
14000
1100
4500
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
AUSEMir. -
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM'
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RfSllLTS
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: GW81
Mli/Kli ANALYTICAL RESULTS
430 MANGANESE
0 16U MERCURY
11 NICKEL
330 POTASSIUM
0.48UJ SELENIUM
1.1U SILVERv
44 SODIUM
0.24U THALLIUM
NA TIN
11 VANADIUM
62J ZINC
36 PERCENT MOISTURE
»»'REMARKS'»»
»»'REMARKS'»»
» * * FOOTNOTES'» »
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
• R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALV. .NAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
2/94
** PROJECT NO. 94-0316
•» SOURCE: ILCO
*» STATION ID: 3
»» CASE NUMBER: 21694
» »
SAMPLE NO. 84153 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1600 STOP:
MD NUMBER: GW80
00/00/00
MO/Kfi
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5100
ALUMINUM
¦140
MANGANESE
20UJ
ANTIMONY
0. 1 7U
MERCURY -
17
ARSENIC
14
NICKEL
50
BARIUM ' „
320
POTASSIUM
0 59J
BERYLLIUM 7
1UJ
SELENIUM
1 3U
CADMIUM-
1 ,3U
SILVER
3100
CALCIUM
60
SODIUM
27J
CHROMIUM"
0.27U
THALLIUM
7.5
COBALT
NA
TIN
7
COPPER *'
18
VANADIUM
26000
IRON
62J
ZINC
48
LEAD
43
PERCENT MOISTURE
1100
MAGNESIUM
*»'REMARKS*»»
*»*REMARKS*»*
•»*F00TN0TES»*»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALV^ MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 04/22/94
METALS DATA REPORT
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SAMPLE NO. 84152 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: P MEYER *
*• SOURCE: ILCO
CITY: LEEDS
ST: AL »
*» STATION ID. 4
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94
1540 STOP. 00/00/00 »
»• CASE NUMBER: 21694
* •
SAS NUMBER:
MD NUMBER: GW79
MG/Kli ANAIYMCAL RESULTS MU/Kti ANALYTICAL RESULTS
4000
ALUMINUM
270
MANGAMCSE
20UJ
ANTIMONY
0. IbU
MERCURY
6.4
ARSENIC
35
NICKEL
39
BARIUM
370
POTASSIUM
1.2J
BERYLLIUM
0 50UJ
SELENIUM
1 . 1U
CADMIUM
1 . 1U
SILVER
2300
CALCIUM ,
CHROMIUM
52
SODIUM
17J
0.25U
THALLIUM
9. 1
COBALT
NA
TIN
9.4
COPPER
16
VANADIUM
18000
IRON
120J
ZINC
65
LEAD
36
PERCENT MOISTURE
590 MAGNESIUM
*»»REMARKS»»» »»*REMARKS»»»
»»'FOOTNOTES*»»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYi .NAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ATHENS. GA.
*2/94
» *
• *
* *
• *
PROJECT MO. 94-0316 —SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: ILCO 0± )
STATION ID:^Hr; & S
84156 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: GW83
GuJ 7%
Mli/KG
ANALY1 If.AL RESULTS
44uO
ALUMINUM
550
SOU J
ANTIMONY
0.17U
10
ARSENIC
17
43
BARIUM
330
0. 78J
BERYLLIUM
0.53UJ
2.8J
CADMIUM
1 .3U
9500
CALCIUM
66
18J
CHROMIUM
1U
8. 1
COBALT
NA
13
COPPER
13
22000
IRON
94J
870
LEAD
44
1900
MAGNESIUM
ANALVT11 .AL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MtRPURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
»»'REMARKS*»»
*»*REMARKS»»*
»*»F00TN0TES**»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Re:gion IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****MEM0RANDuK* ******
DATE: 04/22/94
SUBJECT: Results of Metals Analysis;
9^-0316 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NC: 8318D
FROM: Charles H. Hooper /* ch\*
Chief, ^aboratcry Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: BILL EGKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of zhe Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons t.hat these qualifiers were required.
If you have ar.y questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
-------
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
odse Number: 21694
Project Number: 94-0316
Site: Ilco. Leeds. A1
Element
A. Water
Pb, Se, T1
Ca, Mg
Cd
Sb
Pb
B. Soil
Pb, Se, T1
Cd
Sb
Pb
Sb
Se
Zn
Be
Cr
Cd
Flag
Samples Affected
Reason
U All positives > IDL, but
< CRDL
U All positives > IDL, but
< 10X contaminant level
JN All positives with Fe
concentrations in solution
> 120,000 ug/L
J All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All by ICP with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
U All positives > IDL, but
< CRDL
JN All positives with Fe
concentrations in solution
> 120,000 ug/L
J All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All by ICP with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 110,000 ug/L
J All
J All
J All positives
J All
J All
J MDGW82 & 83
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
Suspected positive interference
as noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Baseline instability
Suspected positive interference
as noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Suspected over correction as
noted in the contractor ICS
Matrix spike recovery = 62.5%
Matrix spike recovery = 61.5%
Matrix spike recovery = 156.2%
Matrix duplicate RPD ~ 65.5%
Matrix duplicate RPD ¦= 85.4%
% CV > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALY. ANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ^l>, ATHENS. GA
REPRINTED ON v.-, 06/94
** PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SAMPLE NO. 84841 SAMPLE TYPE:
FISH PROG
ELEM: SSF
COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
»* SOURCE. ILCO
CITY
LEEDS
ST: AL
** STATION ID: 2
COLLECTION START
03/10/94 1505 STOP
»* CASE
» *
NUMBER. 21694
SAS NUMBER. 8318D
MD
NUMBER. 2460
¦* •* r * r 4
-t f t i + r 1 *
1 t * + » -r i i
1 t t 1 * * *
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
_ MG/KO
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
38
ml urvl) iviut/i
1 o
MAMGAMESE
0.96U
ANTIMONY
0.06
MERCURY
1 U.J
ARSENIC
0 57U
NICKEL
1 7
BARIUM
2900
POTASSIUM
0.05U
BERYLLIUM
0 83J
SELENlUM
1 .2
CADMIUM
O 19U
SILVER
1 1000
CALCIUM
910
SODIUM
1U
CHROMIUM
O.05U
THALLIUM
1U
COBALT
N A
TIN
4U
COPPER
O 24U
VANADIUM
150
IRON
37J
ZINC
11
LEAD
400
MAGNESIUM
32/68/08 JE
* »
* *
* *
» f
* J
***REMARKS*«*
***REMARKS*«*
»»'FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
PROJECT WO. 94-0376
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID- 3
CASE NUMBER- 21691
SAMPLE AND ANALY.
EPA-REGION IV
**»»»*»***»»»*»*»»»*
SAMPLE NO. 84842 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
ANAGEMENT SYSTEM
jL), ATHENS. GA
REPRINTED ON
****** i
,06/94
SAS NUMBER 8318D
,»**,»»»»»*»*»*»»»»»**
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY LEEDS ST' AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1355 STOP 32/68/08 JE
MD NUMBER 2461
Mfj/K.G
o's5U
0 23UJ
1 . 1 J
0 05U
0 19U
15000
0.69
1U
2U
56
1
480
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
» '~J
0.06
O 57U
2700
0 98 J
1U
1 100
O 05U
MA
O. 24U
28J
MA ¦) A [ ¦ E
MERCURY
Ml CK F_l
POTASSIUM
SELEW1UM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VAM^DIUM
ZINC
t I I 1 + » I 4 t 1 1
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
* * *
» *
* *
* *
* *
* *
r t *
~~~REMARKS***
~~~REMARKS***
'"SEke.s k«r^ivN-K;u^^BE;KcT;^;KT?i ass ^is-saRM'sasi sjf*"™ MATER,aL
:s^T!SJ?wtt ^;vv^?.F8s«!s;Lrc§s;ss;ED».«;va!:5ESo}5e^^jrs;iNj,s!JD'-KALvs,s .s necessary fo„ vesica,,™
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYS
EPA-REGION IV
.NAGEMENT SYSTEM
. ATHENS, GA.
REPRINTED ON o~,J6/94
METALS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 4
CASE NUMBER 21694
* *
MG/KG
23 ALUMjMMtvf
0 98U ANTIMONY
0 21UJ ARSn-JTC
1 7 BARIUM
0 05U BERYLLIUM
0 20U CADMIUM
14000 CALCIUM
0 63 CHROMIUM
0 34U COBALT
5U COPPER
39 I RON
0.61 LEAD
440 MAGNESIUM
SAMPLE NO 84843
SAS NUMBER-
* + * + + »
ANALYTICAL RFS"L7S
SAMPLE TYPE. FISH
8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY. LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1215 STOP. 32/68/08
JE
MD NUMBER 2462
t i t * t *
Wp/y G
10
0 06
0 5f:U
2900
0 7 7J
0 20U
1 100
0 0-1U
NA
0 24U
22 J
* »
* *
* *
» *
* *
~ » t
MAMG At\it 3E
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
* * *REMARKS* * *
* * *REMARKS* * *
****A-AVERAGE*VALUE *NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES .J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESU^TIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. ^/ir. .
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALY, ANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ^l) , ATHENS, GA.
REPRINTED ON v. 06/94
** PROJECT NO 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84844
SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
PROG
ELEM: SSF
COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
** SOURCE- ILCO
CITY
. LEEDS
ST: AL
** STATION ID 5
COLLECTION START
03/02/94 0900 STOP
*» CASE
* *
NUMBER- 21694 SAS NUMBER
8318D
MD 1
NUMBER: 2463
* < * 1 *¦ *
* t j » t t s + i i
i * i t i
t 1 f t t ¥ I
1 tt* + t*T + * +
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
27
ALUM]MUM
o 7
MAMbANCSE
0.81U
ANTIMONY
0 04U
MLRCURY
0 23UJ
ARSENIC
0. 49U
NICKEL
0 4 7 J
BARIUM
2900
POTASSIUM
0.04U
BERYLLIUM
0 82,1
SELENIUM
0. 16U
CADMIUM
0. 16U
SILVER
13000
CALCIUM
990
SODIUM
1U
CHROMIUM
0.05U
THALLIUM
0.28U
COBALT
NA
TIN
1 .2
COPPER
0 20U
VANADIUM
41
IRON
30J
ZINC
3.4
LEAD
480
MAGNESIUM
* #
* •
* %
» *
* ~
* r *
**»REMARKS*»*
* "REMARKS* * *
* * * FOOTNOTES* * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****memorandum******
DATE: 05/11/94
SUBJECT: Results of Extractable Organic Analysis;
9A-0316 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 8318D
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: BILL BOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
-------
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21694 Project Number 94-0316
Site ID. Ilco, Leeds, AL
SAS Number 8318D
Affected Sample Compound or Fraction
Extractables
84845,84846
84845
Flag
UsedReason
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol J low internal standard
N-nitrosodiphenylamine J low internal standard
4-bromophenylphenylether J low internal standard
hexachlorobenzene J low internal standard
pentachlorophenol J low internal standard
phenanthrene J low internal standard
anthracene J low interna] standard
di-n-butylphthalate J low internal standard
fluoranthene J low internal standard
carbazole J low internal standard
pyrene J low internal standard
butylbenzy1phthalate J low internal standard
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine J low internal standard
benzo(a)anthracene J low internal standard
chrysene J low internal standard
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate J low internal standard
di-n-octylphthalate J low internal standard
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene J low internal standard
benzo(a)pyrene J low internal standard
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene J low internal standard
dibenz(a,h)anthracene J low internal standard
benzo(g,h,i)perylene J low internal standard
Pesticides
84845
dieldrin
Quantitation limit
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi>. ATHENS, GA.
05/.„/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84845 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1505 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO.: 2464
**
**
* *
* *
* *
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
.48U PHENOL
.48U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
.48U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
.48U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
.48U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
.48U 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
.48U 2-METHYLPHENOL
.48U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
.48U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
.48U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
.48U HEXACHLOROETHANE
.48U NITROBENZENE
.48U ISOPHORONE
.48U 2-NITROPHENOL
.48U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
.48U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
.48U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
.48U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
.48U NAPHTHALENE
.48U 4-CHLOROANILINE
.48U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
.48U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
.48U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
.48U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
.48U 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U 2,4,5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
.48U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.2U 2-NITROANILINE
.48U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
.48U ACENAPHTHYLENE
. 48U 2,6-DINITR0T0LUENE
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2U 3-NITR0ANILINE
.48U ACENAPHTHENE
1.2U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.2U 4-NITR0PHEN0L
.48U DIBENZOFURAN
.48U 2,4-DINITR0T0LUENE
.48U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
.48U 4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.48U FLUORENE
1.2U 4-NITROANILINE
1.2UJ 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
.48UJ N-NIT ROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
.48UJ 4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.48UJ HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.2UJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL
.48UJ PHENANTHRENE
.48UJ ANTHRACENE
.48UJ CARBAZOLE
.48UJ DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
.48UJ FLUORANTHENE
.48UJ PYRENE
.48UJ BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
.48UJ 3.3'-DICHL0R0BENZIDINE
.48UJ BENZ0(A)ANTHRACENE
.48UJ CHRYSENE
.48UJ BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
48UJ Dl-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE. . . .
.48UJ BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
.48UJ BENZO-A-PYRENE
.48UJ INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
.48UJ DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
.48UJ BENZOCGHI)PERYLENE
*»'REMARKS***
**'REMARKS***
* * * FOOTNOTES* * *
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,, ATHENS. GA.
05, w 94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE.NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84845 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1505 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO. : 2464 MD NO:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
5JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
1JN BIS(HYDROXYETHYL)DODECANAMIDE
5JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
2JN (ACETYLOXY)OCTADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
5JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
5JN OCTADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER (2 ISOMERS)
10JN OCTADECADIENAL
20JN CHOLESTEROL
20J 11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
»»'FOOTNOTES'»»
»A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ebo, ATHENS, GA.
05/.j/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84846 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1355 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO.: 2465
* *
**
• *
* •
• *
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
. 98U PHENOL
.98U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
.98U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
.98U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
.98U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
.98U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
.98U 2-METHYLPHENOL
.98U 2,2'-CHL0R0IS0PR0PYLETHER
.98U (3-AND/0R 4-JMFTHYLPHENOL
.98U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
.98U HEXACHLOROETHANE
.98U NITROBENZENE
.98U ISOPHORONE
.98U 2-NITROPHENOL
.98U 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
.98U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
.98U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
.98U 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
.98U NAPHTHALENE
.98U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
.98U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
.98U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
.98U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
.98U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
.98U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
. 98LL . 2_-CHLQR0NAPHTHALENE..
2.4U 2-NITROANILINE
.98U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
.98U ACENAPHTHYLENE
.98U 2,6-DINITR0T0LUENE
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.4U 3-NITROANILINE
.98U ACENAPHTHENE
2.4U 2,4-DINITR0PHEN0L
2.4U 4-NITR0PHEN0L
.98U DIBENZOFURAN
.98U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
.98U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
.98U 4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.98U FLUORENE
2.4U 4-NITROANILINE
2.4UJ 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
.98UJ N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
.98UJ 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.98UJ HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
2.4UJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL
.98UJ PHENANTHRENE
.98UJ ANTHRACENE
.98UJ CARBAZOLE
.98UJ DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
.98UJ FLUORANTHENE
.98U PYRENE
.98U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
.98U 3.3'-DICHL0R0BENZIDINE
.98U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
.98U CHRYSENE
6.0U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
.98U QI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
.98U BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
.98U BENZO-A-PYRENE
.98U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
.98U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
.98U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
**'REMARKS***
**'REMARKS***
'~•FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESu,
3EMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
05/. 94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE.NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84846 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1355 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO.: 2465 MD NO:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
70J 8 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
0.5JN BIS(HYDROXYETHYL JDODECANAMIDE
2JN TETRADECANOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
10JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
1JN PENTADECANOIC ACID
7JN HEXADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
10JN HEXADECANOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
10JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, METHYLESTER
5JN METHYLHEPTADECANOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
50JN CHOLESTEROL
1JN METHYLHEXADECANOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
»»'FOOTNOTES*«»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,, ATHENS. GA.
05/..,94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE NO.: 21694
************
SAMPLE NO. 84847 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
* * *
* * *
SAS NO.: 8318D
*********
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
.48U PHENOL
.48U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
.48U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
.48U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
.48U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
.48U 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
.48U 2-METHYLPHENOL
.48U 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
.48U (3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL
.48U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
.48U HEXACHLOROETHANE
.48U NITROBENZENE
.48U ISOPHORONE
.48U 2-NITROPHENOL
.48U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
.48U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
.48U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
.48U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
.48U NAPHTHALENE
.48U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
.48U HEXACHLOROBUT AD1ENE
.48U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
.48U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
.48U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
.48U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U 2,4,5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
48U z-chlqronaphthalene
1.2U 2-NITR0ANILINE
.48U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
.48U ACENAPHTHYLENE
.48U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1215 STOP: 32/68/08
D. NO.: 2466
**************************
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2U 3-NITROANILINE
.48U ACENAPHTHENE
1.2U 2.4-DINITROPHENOL
1.2U 4-NITROPHENOL
.48U DIBENZOFURAN
.48U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
.48U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
.48U 4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.48U FLUORENE
1.2U 4-NITR0ANILINE
1.2U 2-ME THYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
.48U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
.48U 4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.48U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.2U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
.48U PHENANTHRENE
.48U ANTHRACENE
.48U CARBAZOLE
48U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
.48U FLUORANTHENE
.48U PYRENE
.48U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
.48U 3.3'-DICHL0R0BENZIDINE
.48U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
.48U CHRYSENE
.48U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
.48U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
.48U BENZOCB AND/OR K) FLUORANTHENE
.48U BENZO-A-PYRENE
.48U INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
.48U DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
.48U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
JE
* *
**
* *
* *
* *
***
**'REMARKS**»
»«"REMARKS*»»
**'FOOTNOTES'»»
'A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV Ebi.
.GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS, GA.
05/ «/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE.NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84847 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO. : 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *«
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL «»
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1215 STOP: 32/68/08 JE »•
D NO.: 2466 MD NO: »»
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
3JN DODECANOIC ACID
0.8JN TETRADECANOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
2JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
0.8JN HEXADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
3JN (ACETYLOXY)OCTADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
50JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
2JN OCTADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
20JN CHOLESTEROL
20J 7 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*»'FOOTNOTES**»
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGAN!CS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS «GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG10N IV E$~. ATHENS. CA.
Ob, ,/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
CASE NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84848 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/02/94 0900 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO.: 2467
» *
* •
* *
• *
* »
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
. 75U PHENOL
. 75U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
.75U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
.75U 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
.75U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
.75U 1.2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
.75U 2-METHYLPHENOL
.75U 2,2'-CHL0R0IS0PR0PYLETHER
.75U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
.75U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
.75U HEXACHLOROETHANE
.75U NITROBENZENE
.75U ISOPHORONE
.75U 2-NITROPHENOL
.75U 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
.75U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
.75U 2,4-DICHLOROPHE NOL
.75U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
.75U NAPHTHALENE
.75U 4-CHLOROANILINE
.75U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
.75U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
.75U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
.75U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
.75U 2,4.6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
1.2U 2,4,5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
.75U 2-CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
1.2U 2-NITROANILINE
.75U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
.75U ACENAPHTHYLENE
.75U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2U 3-NITROANILINE
.75U ACENAPHTHENE
1.2U 2,4-DINIT ROPHENOL
1.2U 4-NITROPHENOL
.75U DIBENZOFURAN
.75U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
. 75U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
.75U 4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.75U FLUORENE
1.2U 4-NITROANILINE
1.2U 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
.75U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
.75U 4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
.75U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.2U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
. 75U PHENANTHRENE
.75U ANTHRACENE
. 75U CARBAZOLE
. 75U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
.75U FLUORANTHENE
. 75U PYRENE
. 75U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
.75U 3,3'-DICHLOROBE NZIDINE
. 75U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
. 75U CHRYSENE
.75U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
.75U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
.75U BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
.75U BENZO-A-PYRENE
.75U INDENO (1,2.3-CD) PYRENE
.75U DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
.75U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
••~REMARKS'**
**'REMARKS***
**'FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ES.
.GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
05, .,94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
CASE.NO.; 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84848 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/02/94 0900 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NO.: 2467 MD NO:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
0.5JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
3JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
2JN PENTADECANOIC ACID
0.8JN HEXADECENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
3JN (ACETYLOXY)OCTADECENOIC..METHYLESTER
2JN OCTADECADIENOIC ACID. METHYLESTER
50J 14 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
»»*FOOTNOTES»»«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athen's, Ga. 30613
*****memorandum******
DATE: 05/11/94
SUEJECT: Results of Pesticide/PCB AnaLysis;
94-0316 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NC: 8318D
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Duality Assurance Section
TO: BILL BOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Att.ached i;s a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons that, these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
-------
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21694 Project Number 94-0316
Site ID. Ilco, Leeds, AL
SAS Number 8318D
Affected Sample Compound or Fraction
Extractables
84845,84846
84845
Flag
UsedReason
4 , 6-dinitro-2-methylphenol J low internal standard
N-nitrosodiphenylamine J low internal standard
4-bromophenylphenylether J low internal standard
hexachlorobenzene J low internal standard
pentachlorophenol J low internal standard
phenanthrene J low internal standard
anthracene J low internal standard
di-n-butylphthalate J low internal standard
fluoranthene J low internal standard
carbazole J low internal standard
pyrene J low internal standard
butylbenzylphthalnte J low internal standard
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine J low internal standard
benzo(a)anthracene J low internal standard
chrysene J low internal standard
bis(2-ethylhexy1)phthalate J low internal standard
di-n-octylphthalate J low internal standard
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene J low internal standard
benzo(a)pyrene J low internal standard
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene J low internal standard
dibenz(a,h)anthracene J low internal standard
benzo(g,h,i)perylene J low internal standard
Pesticides
84845
dieldrin
Quantitation limit
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS JEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS. GA.
05/ M
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84845 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NUMBER: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1505 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NUMBER: 2464
* •
* *
* •
»*
» *
MG/KG
.001U
001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
001J
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
MG/KG
. 006U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
. 060U
. 012U
. 024U
.012U
.012U
.012U
. 012U
.012U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH.
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
MIXTURE)
/2
/2
1016)
1221)
1232)
1242)
1248)
1254)
1260)
/I
»»'REMARKS'«»
• "REMARKS'"
'"FOOTNOTES'"
•A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED 'NAI-INTERFERENCES 'J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESi,.
GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
05,
94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84846
SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1355 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NUMBER: 2465
* *
**
* *
• *
* *
MG/KG
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
001U
.001U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
OIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
MG/KG
. 006U
.001U
001U
.001U
.001U
. 060U
. 012U
. 024U
.012U
.012U
. 012U
.012U
012U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
**'REMARKS***
»»'REMARKS*»«
**'FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA RETORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESu.
3EMENT system
aTHENS, GA.
05/ . J4
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84847
SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1215 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NUMBER: 2466
* •
* *
* *
* •
* *
MG/KG
.001U
.001U
.001U
001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
MG/KG
. 006U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
. 063U
. 012U
. 025U
. 012U
. 012U
. 012U
. 012U
. 012U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/I
**'REMARKS***
•»»REMARKS*»«
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS. .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ei>. . ATHENS. GA.
05, , 94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84848
SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/02/94 0900 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
D. NUMBER: 2467
* •
*•
* *
• *
* *
MG/KG
.001U
.001U
.001U
001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
.001U
• 001U
.001U
.001U
OOJU
• 001U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-ODD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
MG/KG
. 007U
.001U
.001U
. 001U
.001U
.065U
. 013U
. 026U
.013U
. 013U
. 013U
. 013U
.013U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
•••REMARKS***
»«'REMARKS*»•
•"FOOTNOTES"*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
COLLEGE STATION RD.
ATHENS, GA. 30613
*****MEMORANDUM******
DATE: 05/17/94
SUBJECT: Results of Specified Analysis;
9 A - 03 16 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 8318D
FROM: Tom B. Bennett, Jr.
ESAT RPO
TO: BILL EOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project. These data replace those previously submitted to
you on these samples
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ATHENS. GA.
REPRINTED ON 05/. , d4
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*** ******************************
•» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84845 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE 1LC0
»» STATION ID: 2
** CASE NO.: 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D
******************************** ***
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER »•
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL **
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1505 STOP: 32/68/08 JE **
D. NO. : 2464 MD NO: »»
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
12 % LIPIDS
» * * FOOTNOTES* * *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS JEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. *THENS. GA.
REPRINTED ON 05/. . J4
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*** ********************************
»* PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84846 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
»» SOURCE: ILCO
»* STATION ID: 3
»« CASE.NO.' 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D
****************************** ***
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *»
CITY: LEEDS ST. AL **
COLLECTION START- 03/10/94 1355 STOP: 32/68/08 JE *~
D NO.• 2465 MD NO. *»
* »
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
5.8 % LIPIDS
*»*FOOTNOTES»«*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESi,.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*»»**»»»»***»»
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84847 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SAS NO.• 8318D
3EMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS, GA.
REPRINTED ON 05/ . J4
PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER »»
CITY: LEEDS ST AL **
COLLECTION START: 03/10/94 1215 STOP. 32/68/08 JE **
D. NO • 2466 MD NO- »»
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
6.5 % LIPIDS
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS iEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu, mTHENS. GA.
REPRINTED ON 05/
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*** *»*»»********»»*»**»************
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84848 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: ILCO
** STATION ID. 5
** CASE.NO.' 21694 SASNO.: 8318D
****************************** ***
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *»
CITY: LEEDS ST. AL **
COLLECTIOW START: 03/02/94 0900 STOP' 32/68/08 JE *»
D NO 2467 MD NO: »»
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
7.2 % LIPIDS
»**FOOTNOTES**»
»A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****memorandum******
DATE: 04/07/94
SUBJECT: Results of Purgeable Organic Analysis;
9A - 0 3 16 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 6318D
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: BILL EOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA OUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact rae.
ATTACHMENT
APE \ 3 1)94
-------
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21694 Project Number 94-0316 SAS Number
Site ID. ILCO, Leeds, AL
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction
Volatiles
84147
84152,84902
Extractables
84152
84154
84902
Flag
Used
acetone
acetone
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3 -cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
phenanthrene
anthracene
benzo(a)anthracene
chrysene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
common lab contaminant
common lab contaminant
erratic response factor
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
< quantitation
< qunatitation
< quantitation
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
limit
limit
limit
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quant
tation limit
tat
tat
tat
on limit
on limit
on limit
tation limit
< quantitation limit
Pesticides
None
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
******************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. TB
CASE NO.: 21694
******************
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESl.
84901 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
.GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1100 STOP. 00/00/00
04/ . .,94
SAS NO.. 8318D
~ ****»»*
D NO
* » * * *
GW76
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENEC1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-D]CHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
10U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
10U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
10U 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U BENZENE
10U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U BROMOFORM
10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE
10U CHLOROBENZENE
10U ETHYL BENZENE
10U STYRENE
10U TOTAL XYLENES
**'REMARKS***
•~~REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSI AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV E„w. ATHENS, GA.
0"., _u/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 0
SAMPLE NO. 84150 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1120 STOP.
00/00/00
CASE NO.
******
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
21694
» * * *
SAS NO.
D. NO.: GW75
*******
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROE THENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10V
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
»»*REMARKS*»*
*»*REMARKS»»«
*«*FOOTNOTES»»*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
«R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS. GA.
04/
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 1
CASE NO : 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84149 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1015 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW74
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10 u
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
»»«REMARKS»*»
»»»remarks**»
**'FOOTNOTES*»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ebi>. ATHENS, GA.
04,^/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NO.: 21694
>**»****»*»
SAMPLE NO. 84148 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0945 STOP. 00/00/00
SAS NO.:
D. NO.: GW73
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
1 . 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
* "REMARKS***
» *'REMARKS* * *
» "FOOTNOTES* «»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*******************
SAMPLE AND ANALYSI. AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV , ATHENS. GA.
* * * *
*********************
04, _ ^,/94
*****************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84147 SAMPLE TYPE- SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
~ * * * *
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
14N
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW72
****** *
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
10U 1.2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
1OU CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
10U 1.1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHANE
10U BENZENE
10U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U BROMOFORM
10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE
10U C.HLOROBENZENE
10U ETHYL BENZENE
10U STYRENE
10U TOTAL XYLENES
**'REMARKS***
** *REMARK,S**»
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb^. ATHENS. GA.
04, _ .,94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
»m 1>TTTT?T»*'»rTT*TTT'rtTTttT1'TT**Tr»
*» PROJECT NO 94-031 b SAMPLE NO. 84147 SAMPLE TYPE SIINKACtWA
** SOURCE. ILCO
»» STATION ID: 3
»» CASE NO : 21694 SAS NO.:
PHOU fcLEM- SS^ COLLECTED BY: P Mfc YbH
CITY. LEEDS ST. AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW72 MD NO: GW72
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
3JN HYDR0XYBEN2ALDEHYDE
*S,im hvDKi'ix yriFM^riT t ut'.jD
»«*FOOTNOTES»»»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS CEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb~ , ATHENS. GA.
04, _„/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE' ILCO
STATION ID. 4
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84146 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
* * * * *
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHL0R0ETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START 03/01/94 0845 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NO
GW71
» > *
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2-D1CHL0R0PR0PANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
»**remarks*»*
»»*REMARKS*«»
«»'FOOTNOTES*»»
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
-------
PURGEABLE ORGAMICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ES.,. ATHENS. GA.
04, _ .,94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
CASE NO.: 21694
**»»»»»**»»
SAMPLE NO. 84145 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFWTR
SAS NO.
t » * *
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0810 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.¦ GW70
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U
CHLOROMETHANE
10U
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
10U
BROMOMETHANE
10U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U
VINYL CHLORIDE
10U
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U
CHLOROETHANE
10U
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
10U
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
10U
1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U
ACETONE
10U
BENZENE
10U
CARBON DISULFIDE
10U
TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
10U
1.1-DICHLOROETHENEM.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U
BROMOFORM
10U
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
10U
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
10U
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
10U
CHLOROFORM
10U
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
10U
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U
TOLUENE
10U
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U
CHLOROBENZENE
10U
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
10U
ETHYL BENZENE
10U
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
10U
STYRENE
10U
TOTAL XYLENES
» *'REMARKS* * »
***REMARKS**«
* * *FOOTNOTES* » *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESc.
.GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS, GA.
04/../94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. TB
SAMPLE NO. 84156 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
CASE NO.
~ * * » »
21694
~ * * 1
SAS NO
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
12U CHLOROMETHANE
12U BROMOMETHANE
12U VINYL CHLORIDE
12U CHLOROETHANE
12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
12U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
12U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
12U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE
12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
12U CHLOROFORM
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
12U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST' AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1120 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NO.: DGW83
UG/KG
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
19
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
»*»REMARKS«*»
«**REMARKS*»*
*»*FOOTNOTES»*«
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS.
E PA-REG I ON IV Ebc.
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 0
CASE NO.: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84151 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.
~ * * *
UG/KG
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE )
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
aGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1430 STOP. 00/00/00
04,_„/94
D. NO.' GW77
*»*»*»*
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
14U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
14U CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
14U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
14U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
14U 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
14U BENZENE
14U TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
14U BROMOFORM
14U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
14U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
14U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE )
14U 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
14U TOLUENE
14U CHLOROBENZENE
14U ETHYL BENZENE
14U STYRENE
14U TOTAL XYLENES
26 PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS»»»
***REMARKS**»
*»»FOOTNOTES»»»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl,, ATHENS, GA. 04/^„/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84151 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE. ILCO
STATION ID: 0
CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY. LEEDS ST. AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1430 STOP: 00/00/00
D NO.: GW77 MD NO: GW77
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
100JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
V IINIDFnT i i Ffl I .I'lMPOllWOS
* * » FOOTNOTES* » »
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS CEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb^. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
***********************************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 1
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84155 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
~ * * * *
UG/KG
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1 . 2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1. 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
***** i
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY. LEEDS
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.
i * • t
GW82
UG/KG
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
25
04/ —./94
**********************
COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
ST: AL
03/01/94 1655 STOP: 00/00/00
*********************
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DI BROMOC.HLOROME THANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHL0R0BEN2ENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
* "REMARKS***
***REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS aGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
04/W94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
*** *»**»***»*»**»»»»*»»*»»»»**»»»
»« PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84155 SAMPLE TYPE' SOIL
*» SOURCE: ILCO
** STATION ID: 1
»* CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS K10. :
»*»*»**»»»***»»*»*»»»»»*»»*»**»*»
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY. LEEDS ST. AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1655 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW82 MD NO: GW82
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
2000J 4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*»»FOOTNOTES«»*
»A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
«R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS aGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV . ATHENS. GA.
04/„o/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84154 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO
UG/KG
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
PROG ELEM SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1620 STOP 00/00/00
D NO.: GW81
********
UG/KG
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
29
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1 , 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DI BROMOCHLOROME THANE
1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
»»*REMARKS»*«
* *'REMARKS* * *
* * * FOOTNOTES1* *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
04/Ou/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
***
»* PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84154 SAMPLE TYPE- SOIL
*~ SOURCE: ILCO
** STATION ID: 2
»» CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO.:
*»*»»»***»»»»**»»»»*»»»**»»»»»*»*
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START- 03/01/94 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.¦ GW81 MD NO- GW81
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/K.G
2000JN TETRAMETHYLBUTYLPHENOL
20000.) !.'¦< IINIDFNTTFJFn (.OMPOIINOS
»*»FOOTNOTES»»»
»A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESo.
jEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
04/v
, 94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE NO.: 21694
»***»»****»
SAMPLE NO. 84153 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.
r * * *
UG/KG
MU
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
141)
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 ,1 -DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
* * * *
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1600 STOP. 00/00/00
D NO.: GW80
UG/KG
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
14U
26
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHL0R0BEN2ENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
»»*REMARKS*»»
*«*REMARKS»»«
**»FOOTNOTES*»»
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESU, ATHENS, GA. 04/vjo/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84153 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM' SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
SOURCE: ILCO CITY. LEEDS ST. AL
STATION ID: 3 COLLECTION START- 03/01/94 1600 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE. NO. : 21694 SAS NO.: D NO.: GW80 MD NO: GW80
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/K.G
300JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
,-tOOO.I 6 IIN1(")FNT 1 F 1 FT) r.liMPOIINDS
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
**************
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ES_
* * * *
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
SAMPLE NO. 84152 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
CASE NO.
~ * * * *
21694
i t » 1
SAS NO.:
******
UG/KG
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
28NJ
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1 ,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE )
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROME THANE
¦GEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1540 STOP: 00/00/00
04/
-,94
* <
D. NO.: GW79
t ***** *
UG/KG
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
32
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
1.1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2. 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•~~REMARKS***
* * *REMARKS* * *
•~~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANALYZED ~NAI-INTERFERENCES ~J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS. GA. 04/..,94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
** PROJECT
NO. 94-0316
SAMPLE
NO. 84152 SAMPLE TYPE' SOIL
PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED
BY: P MEYER »«
»» SOURCE:
ILCO
CITY. LEEDS
ST. AL »»
*» STATION
ID: 4
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94
1540 STOP: 00/00/00 »*
»* CASE.NO
T t
: 21694
SAS
NO. :
D. NO : GW79
MD NO: GW79 »»
t *
ANALYTICAL RESULTS "JG/K.G
2000J 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
**»FOOTNOTES»»«
»A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS CEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV . ATHENS, GA.
04,_-/94
* * * *
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
SAMPLE NO. 84902 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
CASE NO.
» * * » »
UG/KG
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
16NJ
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
21694
~ * * i
SAS NO.: 8318D
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1510 STOP. 00/00/00
NO.: GW78
UG/KG
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
15U
35
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1 . 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS**«
* * «REMARKS» »»
**'FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS «GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS, GA.
04/^/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS - DATA REPORT
»»*
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84902 SAMPLE TYPE' SOIL
»* SOURCE: ILCO
»» STATION ID: 5
*» CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D
»»»»»*»»**»»*»***»#**»***»»*»**»»
PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY. LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW78 MD NO:
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
200JN DIHYDROMETHYLETHENYLNAPHTHOFURAN
200JN HEXADFf.ANOTf. Al.ID
200JN BENZOFLUORENE
4000J 6 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
«»*FOOTNOTES»»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environments] Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****MEMORANDUM******
DATE: 04/07/9A
SUBJECT: Results of Extractable Organic Analysis;
9^-0316 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 6318D
AL
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Qua 1ity Assurance Section
TO: BILL EOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons t.hat. these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
m 1 3 iw
-------
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21694 Project Number 94-0316 SAS Number
Site ID. ILCO, Leeds, AL
Flag
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction Used
Volatiles
84147
84152,84902
Extractables
84152
84154
84902
acetone N
acetone N
J
di-n-octylphthalate J
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene J
benzo(a)pyrene J
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene J
dibenz(a,h)anthracene J
benzo(g,h,i)perylene J
fluoranthene J
pyrene J
chrysene J
di-n-octylphthalate J
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene J
benzo(a)pyrene J
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene J
dibenz(a,h)anthracene J
benzo(g,h,i)perylene J
phenanthrene J
anthracene J
benzo(a)anthracene J
chrysene J
benzo(a)pyrene J
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene J
Reason
common lab contaminant
common lab contaminant
erratic response factor
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
< quantitation
< qunatitation
< quantitation
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
limit
limit
limit
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
tat
tat
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quantitat
on limit
on limit
tation limit
tat
on limit
on limit
< quantitation limit
Pesticides
None
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS jEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESL. .-.THENS, GA.
04/ . _,4
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 0
CASE NO.: 21694
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U PHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
10U 2-CHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 2-METHYLPHENOL
10U 2.2'-CHL0R0IS0PR0PYLETHER
10U (3-AND/0R 4-)METHVLPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
10U HEXACHLOROETHANE
10U NITROBENZENE
10U ISOPHORONE
10U 2-NITROPHENOL
10U 2.4-DIMETHYLPHEN0L
10U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETH0XY) METHANE
10U 2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
10U NAPHTHALENE
10U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
10U HEXACHLOROBUT ADIENE
iOu 4-CHLGR0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
10U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1011 HEXACHLORDCYCLOPENTAD]ENE (HCCPJ
IOU 2.4.6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
25U 2.4,5-1RICHLOROPHENOL
10U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITROANILINE
10U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10U ACENAPHTHYLENE
IOU 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAMPLE NO. 84150 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1120 STOP:
00/00/00
SAS NO.
D. NO : GW75
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
25U 3-NITROANILJNE
IOU ACENAPHTHENE
25U 2 ,4-DINITR0PHEN0L
25U 4-NITROPHENOL
10U DIBENZOFURAN
IOU 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
IOU DIETHYL PHTHALATE
IOU 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10(1 FLl/ORENE
25U 4-NITROANILINE
25U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
10'J 4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB;
25U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
IOU PHENANTHRENE
IOU ANTHRACENE
IOU CARBAZOLE
IOU D]-N-BUT YL PHT HALATE
10U FLUORANTHENE
10U PYRENE
iOu BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
O 0/_r*T^UI npftDClITT p T l|C
10(1 REN/Ol A.)ANTHRACENF
IOU CHRYSENE
10U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
IOU DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
IOU BENZOCB AND/OR K) FLUORANTHENE
10U BENZO-A-PYRENE
10U INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
IOU DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
IOU BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
»»»REMARKS»»«
•~~REMARKS***
*»»FOOTNOTES»*«
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
«K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. . ATHENS. GA.
04/ , J4
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 1
CASE NO.: 21694
*********************
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U PHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
10U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
10U 1,3-D1CHLOROBENZENE
10U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 1,2-DICHLOROBEN2ENE
IOU 2-METHYLPHENOL
10U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
10U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
10U HEXACHLOROETHANE
10U NITROBENZENE
10U ISOPHORONE
10U 2-NITROPHENOL
10U 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
10U 2.4-01CHLOROPHE NOL
10U 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
10U NAPH1HALENt
10U 4-CHLOROANILINE
10U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
iOU 4-CHLGRG-3-METHYLPHEN0L
1CU 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1011 HEXAf.HLORnr.Yr.LOPENTADIENE I HCCP I
10U 2.4,6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
25U 2.4,5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 2-CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITROANILINE
IOU DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
IOU ACENAPHTHYLENE
10U 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAMPLE NO. 84149 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1015 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO
D. NO.
t * * »
GW74
UG/L
25U
IOU
25U
25U
10U
IOU
10U
10U
1011
25U
25U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
IOU
IOU
IOU
10U
10U
i Gu
a r\i i
i
IOU
IOU
20U
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
10U
IOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FL IIORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-3R0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
UI-N-bU IYLPHTHALA I t
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BEN^VL BliTVL PHTHALATE
o o'.nirui npnocmrnTiic
RFNZOIA IANTHRM FNF
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZOfGHI)PERYLENE
•~~REMARKS***
»*.REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS tGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ES^. ATHENS. GA.
04/^/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84148 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NO.• 21694 SAS NO.:
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U PHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
10U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
10U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 1,4-DICHLOROBEWZENE
10U 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 2-METHYLPHENOL
10U 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
10U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
10U HEXACHLOROETHANE
10U NITROBENZENE
10U ISOPHORONE
1011 2-NI T ROPHENOL
10U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETH0XY) METHANE
10U 2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
10U NAPHTHALENE
10U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
10U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
10U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
10U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
10U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
10U 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
25U 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
10U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITROANILINE
10U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10U ACENAPHTHYLENE
10U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START- 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW73
*~»*********»~****~*#****#~*~»»
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U 3-NITROANILINE
10U ACENAPHTHENE
25U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
25U 4-NITROPHENOL
10U DIBENZOFURAN
10U 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
10U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
10U 4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10U FLUORENE
25U 4-NITR0ANILINE
25U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
10U 4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB;
25U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
10U PHENANTHRENE
10U ANTHRACENE
10U CARBAZOLE
10U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
10U FLUORANTHENE
10U PYRENE
10U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
10U 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
10U BENZ0(A)ANTHRACENE
10U CHRYSENE
10U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
10U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
10U BENZOCB AND/OR K) FLUORANTHENE
10U BENZO-A-PYRENE
10U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
10U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
10U BENZOCGHI)PERYLENE
«*»FOOTNOTES«»*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS iGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb^. ATHENS, GA.
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*******************************************
04, .,94
<*********************
* PROJECT NO. 94-0316
« SOURCE' ILCO
* STATION ID. 3
*
» CASE NO.: 21694
****»**»*****»*»*»«»*»
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12 PHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
10U 2-CHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 1,3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 2-METHYLPHENOL
10U 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
10U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
10U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
10U HEXACHLOROETHANE
10U NITROBENZENE
10U ISOPHORONE
10U 2-NITROPHENOL
10U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
10U 2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 1.2,4-TRICHL0R0BENZENE
10U NAPHTHALENE
10U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
10U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
10U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHENOL
10U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
10U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE ( HCC.P >
10U 2.4.6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
25U 2,4.5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
10U 2-CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITR0ANILINE
10U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10U ACENAPHTHYLENE
10U 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAMPLE NO. 84147 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0945 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NO.• GW72
UG/L
25U
10U
25 U
25U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
25U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
1011
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2. 4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENVLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
D1—N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZOCA.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
S.oC< V \ 1
\0^-O r?C'\
XOa ^ \ vi
»*«FOOTNOTES**«
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
«K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl. . ATHENS. GA.
04/
,94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84146 SAMPLE TYPE' SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE NO.: 21694
»»»»
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U PHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
10U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
1OU 1,3-DICHL0RO6ENZENE
10U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
10U 1,2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U 2-METHYLPHEN0L
10U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
10U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
10U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
10U HEXACHLOROETHANE
10U NITROBENZENE
10U ISOPHORONE
10U 2-NITROPHENOL
10U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
10U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
10U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
10U 1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
10U NAPHTHALENE
10U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
10U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
10U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
1CU 2-VETHYLNArHTHALENE
irill HE xai Hi OROCYt.l OPf-'NTAfM FNF (HC.l.P)
10U 2.4,6-fRICHLOROPHENOL
25U 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
10U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITROANILINE
10U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10U ACENAPHTHYLENE
10U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAS NO.:
CITY. LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0845 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW71
*****
UG/L
25U
10U
25U
26U
10U
10U
10U
10U
1011
25U
25U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
i Ou
1 nn
• w <->
KM I
10U
10U
1 ou
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITR0ANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-MITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHEN'YL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
Ul '-N-OUl YLPHIHALAIt
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
O o ' r> T i~ [_>' OP^DCintPiUic
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
*»*REMARKS***
**»remarks«*»
»»»FOOTNOTES»»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIL AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ei-. ATHENS, GA. 04,^/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** I************************************************************* *»»
*» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84145 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFWTR PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER **
** SOURCE: ILCO CITY- LEEDS ST: AL «*
** STATION ID. 5 COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0810 STOP: 00/00/00 *»
* * * *
»» CASE NO.: 21694 SAS NO.: D. NO.: GW70 »»
*»* »*****»»»»*»»»**»****»»****»****»»**»***»*»*»»»***»»*»»*»»*»»* *«»
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U
PHENOL
25U
3-NITR0ANILINE
10U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
10U
ACENAPHTHENE
10U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
25U
2 ,4-DINITROPHENOL
10U
1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
25U
4-NITR0PHEN0L
10U
1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U
DIBENZOFURAN
10U
1,2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
10U
2 ,4-DINITROTOLUENE
10U
2-METHYLPHENOL
10U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
10U
2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
10U
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
10U
FLUORENE
10U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
25U
4-NITROANILINE
10U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
25U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
10U
NITROBENZENE
10U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
10U
ISOPHORONE
10U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
10U
2-NITROPHENOL
10U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
10U
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
25U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
10U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
10U
PHENANTHRENE
10U
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
10U
ANTHRACENE
10U
1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
10U
CARBAZOLE
10U
NAPHTHALENE
10U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
10U
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
10U
FLUORANTHENE
10U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
10U
PYRENE
10U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
10U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
10U
2-methylnaphthalene
10U
3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
10U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCC.P)
1 ott
BENZOL) ANTHRACENE
10U
2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
10U
CHRYSENE
25U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
10U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
10U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
10U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
25U
2-NITROANILINE
10U
BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
10U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
10U
BENZO-A-PVRENE
10U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
10U
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
10U
2,6-DINITR0T0LUENE
10U
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
10U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
* "FOOTNOTES** «
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ATHENS, GA. 04, .„/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************** ***
*» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84151 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER **
** SOURCE' ILCO CITY- LEEDS ST: AL **
*~ STATION ID. 0 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 »*
CASE
NO : 21694 SAS NO ¦
D. NO.: GW77
t * » »
»**»»**»*»****»¦»»»*******
********
******************
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
440U
PHENOL
1 100U
3-NITR0ANILINE
440U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
440U
ACENAPHTHENE
440U
2-CHL0R0PHEN0L
1 100U
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
440U
1,3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
1 100U
4-NITROPHENOL
440U
1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
440U
DIBENZOFURAN
440U
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
440U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
440U
2-METHYLPHENOL
440U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
440U
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
440U
FLUORENE
440U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1 100U
4-NITROANILINE
440U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1 100U
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
440U
NITROBENZENE
440U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
440U
ISOPHORONE
440U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
2-NITROPHENOL
440U
HEXAC.HLOROBENZENE (HCB)
440U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1100U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
440U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
440U
PHENANTHRENE
440U
2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
440U
ANTHRACENE
440U
1,2,4-TRICHL0R0BENZENE
440U
CARBAZOLE
440U
NAPHTHALENE
440U
DI—N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
440U
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
440U
FLUORANTHENE
440U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
440U
PYRENE
440U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHENOL
440U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
440U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
440U
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
440U
HEXAf.HLOROr.VCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
440U
BENZO(A)ANTHRAfENE
440U
2,4,6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
440U
CHRYSENE
1 100U
2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
440U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
440U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
440U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1 100U
2-NITROANILINE
440U
BENZO(B AND/OR KOFLUORANTHENE
440U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
440U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
440U
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
440U
2.6-DINITR0T0LUENE
440U
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
440U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
26
PERCENT MOISTURE
* * *FOOTNOTES*•*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ATHENS. GA.
04/„o/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84155 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
SOURCE: ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST' AL
STATION ID. 1 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1655 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE
NO.: 21694 SAS NO :
D. NO.: GW82
> * * *
*****************************
* * * *
******************
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
440U
PHENOL
1 100U
3-NITROANILINE
440U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
440U
ACENAPHTHENE
440U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1 100U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
440U
1 ,3-DIC.HLOROBENZENE
1 100U
4-NITR0PHEN0L
440U
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
440U
DIBENZOFURAN
440U
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
440U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
440U
2-METHYLPHENOL
440U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
440U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
(3-AND/OR 4-)ME THYL PHE NOL
440U
FLUORENE
440U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1100U
4-NITROANILINE
440U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1 100U
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
440U
NITROBENZENE
440U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
440U
ISOPHORONE
440U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
2-NITROPHENOL
440U
HEXAC.HLOROBENZENE (HCB)
440U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1 100U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
440U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
440U
PHENANTHRENE
440U
2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
440U
ANTHRACENE
440U
1,2.4-TRICHL0R0BENZENE
440U
CARBAZOLE
440U
NAPHTHALENE
440U
Dl-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
440U
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
440U
FLUORANTHENE
440U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
440U
PYRENE
440U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHENOL
440U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
440U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
440U
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
440U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCC.P)
440U
BENZOIA)ANTHRACENE
440U
2.4,6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
440U
CHRYSENE
1100U
2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
440U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
440U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
440U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1100U
2-NITROANILINE
440U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
440U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
440U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
440U
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
440U
2,6-DINITR0T0LUENE
440U
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
440U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
25
PERCENT MOISTURE
**'FOOTNOTES**»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS aGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb„. ATHENS. GA.
04/_ ~/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 2
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84154 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
UG/KG
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
1100U
460U
1 100U
460U
460U
460U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
2-CHL0R0PHEN0L
1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENIE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
N-NIT ROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
8IS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2 .4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HC.CP)
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1620 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW81
*******
UG/KG
1 100U
460U
1 100U
1 100U
460U
460U
460U
460U
460U
1100U
1 100U
460U
460U
460U
1 100U
460U
460U
460U
460U
120 J
1 70J
460U
460U
460U
110J
460U
460UJ
460UJ
460UJ
460UJ
460UJ
460UJ
29
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITR0PHEN0L
DIBENZOFURAN
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXAC.HLOROBENZENE (HC.B)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE " ~ —— --
PYRENE ^ _ I
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE <
3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE ?
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE \
CHRYSENE ^
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZOCB AND/OR K) FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYREKIE
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE /
BENZOtGHI)PERYLENE /
PERCENT MOISTURE
y
<
r o >¦ J
i.\{ e / .v. (
•~~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS tGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi>, ATHENS. GA.
04/-_/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID. 3
CASE NO.: 21694
***********
SAMPLE NO. 84153 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1600 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: GW80
* * * *
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
440U
PHENOL
1 100U
3-NITR0ANILINE
440U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
440U
ACENAPHTHENE
440U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1 100U
2.4-DINITR0PHEN0L
440U
1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 100U
4-NITROPHENOL
440U
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
440U
DIBENZOFURAN
440U
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
440U
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
440U
2-METHYLPHENOL
440U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
440U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
440U
FLUORENE
440U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1 100U
4-NITROANILINE
440U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1 100U
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
440U
NITROBENZENE
440U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
440U
ISOPHORONE
440U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
440U
2-NIT ROPHE NOL
440U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
440U
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
440U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
440U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETH0XY) METHANE
440U
PHENANTHRENE
440U
2.4-DICHL0R0PHEN0L
440U
ANTHRACENE
440U
1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
440U
CARBAZOLE
440U
NAPHTHALENE
440U
Dl-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
440U
4-CHL0R0ANI LINE
440U
FLUORANTHENE
440U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
440U
PYRENE
440U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHVLPHENOL
440U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
440U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
440U
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
440U
HEXAC.HLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HC.r.P)
440U
BENZOlA)ANTHRACENE
440U
2 ,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
440U
CHRYSENE
1 100U
2.4. 5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
440U
BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
440U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
440U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1 100U
2-NITROANILINE
440U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
440U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
440U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
440U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
440U
INDENO (1,2.3-CD) PYRENE
440U
2,6-DINITR0T0LUENE
440U
DIBENZOtA.H)ANTHRACENE
440U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
26
PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES**«
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ebi,. ATHENS, GA. 04,-„/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84152 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
* SOURCE: ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
* STATION ID. 4 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1540 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE
NO.: 21694
SAS NO.: D. NO.: GW79
* * * *
***»»»»»********»
»»***»»*»*»»*»»*
»**********«*»»»*»
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
480U
PHENOL
1200U
3-NITROANI LINE
480U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
480U
ACENAPHTHENE
480U
2-CHL0R0PHEN0L
1200U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
480U
1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1200U
4-NITROPHENOL
480U
1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
480U
DIBENZOFURAN
480U
1.2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
480U
2.4-DINITR0T0LUENE
480U
2-METHYLPHEN0L
480U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
480U
2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
480U
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
480U
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL
480U
FLUORENE
480U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1200U
4-NITROANILINE
480U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1200U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
480U
NITROBENZENE
480U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
480U
ISOPHORONE
480U
4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
480U
2-NITROPHENOL
480U
HEXAC.HLOROBENZENE (HC.B)
480U
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1200U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
480U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
480U
PHENANTHRENE
480U
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
480U
ANTHRACENE
480U
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
480U
CARBAZOLE
480U
NAPHTHALENE
480U
Dl-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
480U
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
480U
FLUORANTHENE
480U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
480U
PYRENE
480U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
460U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
480U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
480U
3.3'-DICHL0R0BENZIDINE
48011
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (Hr.r.P)
480U
BENZOla)ANTHRACENE
480U
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
480U
CHRYSENE
1200U
2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
480U
BIS t2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
480U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
480UJ
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1200U
2-NITROANILINE
480UJ
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
480U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
480UJ
BENZO-A-PYRENE
480U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
480UJ
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
480U
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
480UJ
DIBENZOCA,H)ANTHRACENE
480UJ
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
32
PERCENT MOISTURE
•««F00TN0TES»**
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS aGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ES^. ATHENS. GA.
04, _ ,,94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 5
CASE NO.: 21694
*********************
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
51OU PHENOL
510U BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
51OU 2-CHLOROPHENOL
510U 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
510U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
510U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
510U 2-METHYLPHEN0L
510U 2,2'-CHL0R0IS0PR0PYLETHER
510U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
510U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
510U HEXACHLOROETHANE
51OU NITROBENZENE
51OU ISOPHORONE
51OU 2-NITROPHENOL
51 OU 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
510U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
510U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
510U 1,2.4-TRICHL0R0BENZENE
51OU NAPHTHALENE
510U 4-CHL0R0ANILINE
51 OU HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
510U 4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
510U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
510U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCC-PJ
510U 2,4.6-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
1200U 2,4,5-TRICHL0R0PHEN0L
510U 2-CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
1200U 2-NITROANILINE
510U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
510U ACENAPHTHYLENE
51OU 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAMPLE NO. 84902 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.: 8318D
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1510 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NO : GW78
*******
UG/KG
1200U
510U
1200U
1200U
51 OU
510U
510U
510U
510U
1200U
1200U
51 OU
510U
51 OU
1200U
370J
82J
51 OU
51 OU
620
620
510U
51 OU
3S0J
340J
51 OU
510U
660
26 OJ
130J
510U
510U
35
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITR0ANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-ME THYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DI PHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE P
ANTHRACENE \
CARBAZOLE —*
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE "
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3_JH.-DI.CHLQRQ&ENZIDJNE
/ BENZO!A(ANTHRACENE
Lchrysene —'
BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE ~
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYREN
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRy
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
1
0<3( ^
4
I.
"l-O (. lA*
{c C n yjc- O O
O
MATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIV
I ;< [%¦
" £ (V-O C*-
Q ZX. oO
I
EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
«*»FOOTNOTES**»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTl
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region ]7
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****MEMORANDUM******
DATE: OA/07/94
SUBJECT: Results of Pesticide/PCB Analysis;
9A - 03 16 ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: 831SD
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Qua 1ity Assurance Section
TO: BILL EOKEY
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
-------
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21694 Project Number 94-0316
Site ID. ILCO, Leeds, AL
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction
Volatiles
84147 acetone
84152,84902 acetone
Extractables
84152
84154
84902
Flag
Used
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g, h,i)perylene
phenanthrene
anthracene
benzo(a)anthracene
chrysene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
N
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
SAS Number
Reason
common lab contaminant
common lab contaminant
erratic response factor
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
low internal
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
standard
< quantitation
< qunatitation
< quantitation
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
low internal s
limit
limit
limit
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
tandard
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
recovery
tation limit
tation limit
tation limit
tation limit
tation limit
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quant
< quantitation limit
Pesticides
None
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84145
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 5
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSlb. AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ebo. ATHENS. GA.
04/ uo/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFWTR
********************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0810 STOP:
D NUMBER- GW70
00/00/00
UG/L
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0 10U
0. 10U
**********
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/L
0.50U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0.050U
0 050U
5.0U
1 .OU
2 OU
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 OU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
(AROCLOR
MIXTURE )
/2
/2
1016)
1221 )
1232)
1242)
1248)
1254)
1260)
/1
«»*REMARKS»»*
*»«REMARKS»*»
* * * FOOTNOTES" *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1 WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE MO. 84146
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 4
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS. GA.
04/U6/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
*************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START 03/01/94 0845 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NUMBER- GW71
UG/L
0 050U
0.050U
0 050U
0 050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/L
0.50U
0 10U
0. 10U
) 050U
).050U
5.0U
1 .OU
2 OU
1 .OU
1 OU
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 OU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/I
**'REMARKS***
***REMARKS***
**'FOOTNOTES*»*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. ATHENS, GA.
04/U6/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID: 3
CASE NUMBER- 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84147 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NUMBER-
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 0945 STOP.
D. NUMBER: GW72
00/00/00
UG/L
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
O. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/L
0 50U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0.050U
0.050U
5.0U
1 .OU
2 OU
1 .OU
1 OU
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 OU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
»«'REMARKS**«
»»'REMARKS**»
"•FOOTNOTES* »»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2 CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84148
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID. 2
CASE NUMBER- 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS, AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl. . ATHENS. GA.
04/ub/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NUMBER: GW73
* * *
UG/L
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0 10U
0. 10U
0 10U
0. 10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/L
0.50U
0. 10U
0. WU
0 050U
0.050U
5.0U
1 .OU
2 OU
1 .OU
1 OU
1 OU
1 .OU
1 OU
**********>
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
**'REMARKS**»
**'REMARKS***
* * * FOOTNOTES* * *
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84149
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID: 1
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl>. ATHENS. GA.
04/ue>/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1015 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NUMBER: GW74
UG/L
0 050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4 .4 '-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4 .4 '-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/L
0.50U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0.050U
0.050U
5.0U
1 .OU
2.0U
1 .OU
1 .OU
1 OU
1 .OU
1 OU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
»»»REMARKS»»»
*»'REMARKS**»
*»'FOOTNOTES'*»
»A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
'C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS iGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV E^.. ATHENS, GA.
OA, ,94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 0
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84150 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NUMBER-
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NUMBER: GW75
# * * »
UG/L
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.05OU
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
0. 10U
***********
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
******
UG/L
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
ENDOSULFAN
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN
4,4'-DDD (P
ENDOSULFAN
4,4'-DDT (P
EPOXIDE
I (ALPHA)
II (BETA)
.P'-DDD)
SULFATE
,P'-DDT)
**********
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.50U METHOXYCHLOR
0.10U ENDRIN KETONE
0.10U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
0.050U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
0.050U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
5 OU TOXAPHENE
1 OU PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
2 OU PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.0U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1 OU PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
/1
*»»REMARKS**»
»»*REMARKS»**
»«* FOOTNOTES"*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
»R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************:
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84151
SOURCE- ILCO
STATION ID: 0
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS AGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl-. ATHENS, GA.
04/uo/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST- AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1430 STOP. 00/00/00
D NUMBER: GW77
* * »
UG/KG
2. 3U
2 3U
2.3U
2 3U
2 3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
4.5U
4.5U
4.5U
4.5U
4.5U
4 5U
4.5U
»»»»»****»»
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/KG
23U
4.5U
4.5U
2.3U
2.3U
230U
45U
91 U
45U
45U
45U
45U
45U
26
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/I
*»REMARKS*»»
»«»REMARKS»«*
*»FOOTNOTES*•«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS
. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS aGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESo. ATHENS. GA.
04/uo/94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID: 4
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84152 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1540 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NUMBER: GW79
UG/KG
2.5U
2 5U
2.5U
2 5U
2.5U
2.5U
2.5U
2.5U
4.9U
4.9U
4.9U
4 9U
4.9U
4 9U
4.9U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4 .4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/KG
25U
4.9U
4.9U
2.5U
2.5U
250U
49U
99U
49U
49U
49U
49U
49U
32
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PC.B-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/1
»«»REMARKS»»»
»»»REMARKS»»*
*»»FOOTNOTES»*»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************:
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84153
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 3
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESu.
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
UG/KG
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
4 5U
4.5U
4.5U
4.5U
4.5U
4 5U
4.5U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
AGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
*************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1600 STOP. 00/00/00
D. NUMBER: GW80
04/wo/94
* * * *
UG/KG
23U
4.5U
4. 5U
2.3U
2.3U
230U
45U
91U
45U
45U
45U
45U
45U
26
***********
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/1
'"REMARKS'"
'"REMARKS'"
• "FOOTNOTES'"
'A-AVERAGE VALUE 'NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
'U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
'C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
*************»******:
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84154
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 2
CASE NUMBER: 21694 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS
EPA-REGION IV ESu.
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
AGEMENT SYSTEM
ATHENS. GA.
*************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
D NUMBER- GW81
04, __,/94
* * * * *
UG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.4U ALPHA-BHC
2.4U BETA-BHC
2.4U DELTA-BHC
2.4U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
2.4U HEPTACHLOR
2.4U ALDRIN
2.4U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
2.4U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
4.6U DIELDRIN
4.6U 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
4.6U ENDRIN
4 6U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.6U 4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
4 6U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.6U 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/KG
24U
4.6U
9.0U
2.4U
2.4U
240U
46U
94U
46U
46U
46U
46U
46U
29
**************
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/I
»»»REMARKS»»*
* * *REMARKS» * »
«»*FOOTNOTES*»»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********
SAMPLE NO. 84155
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESl. . ATHENS, GA.
04/
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 1
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1655 STOP: 00/00/00
D NUMBER- GW82
,94
*
UG/KG
2 3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2.3U
2 3U
2.3U
4 4U
4.4U
4.4U
4 4U
4.4U
4 4U
4.4U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
UG/KG
23U
4.4U
4.4U
2.3U
2 3U
230U
44U
89U
44U
44U
44U
44U
44U
25
***»»»***»
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/1
***REMARKS***
»»'REMARKS*»»
***FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Eb^. ATHENS. GA.
04,
94
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE: ILCO
STATION ID. 5
CASE NUMBER: 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84902 SAMPLE TYPE' SOIL
SAS NUMBER: 8318D
UG/KG
2.6U
2.6U
2.6U
2 6U
2 6U
2 6U
2 6U
2.6U
5 1U
5. 1U
8.2
5. 1U
5. 1U
5. 1U
5. 1U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: P MEYER
CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NUMBER' GW78
UG/KG
26 U
5 1U
7.0U
2 6U
2 6U
260U
51 U
100U
51 U
51U
51U
51U
51U
35
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PERCENT MOISTURE
/1
P - L 6^)
O.O
m
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
Cc]lege Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
*****memorandum-•¦-***••
DATE: 06/02/94
SUEJECT: Rc-suits of Specified Analysis;
9 4 - G 3 1 fc ILCO
LEEDS AL
CASE NO: 21694SAS NO: S318D
FROM: Charles H. Hooper
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: BILL EOXEY
Attached s:« the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project.
As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
REPORT wh-ch explains; the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ATTACHMENT
m
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS JEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESL>, ATHENS. GA. 06/~_, 94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
**» ****»******»****»»»*»»»»**»»*»»*»»*~**»*»*»*»»»*»»*»»*»»**»*** *»»
** PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84849 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *»
»* SOURCE: ILCO CITY LEEDS ST' AL **
** STATION ID. 5 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0810 STOP. 32/68/08 JE **
** CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D D. NO MD NO: 2478 *»
* * * »
*** ***** + ********************** + *#** + *•*************************** #*#
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
***FOOTNOTES*»«
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ES^. ATHENS. GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*** ****»***»»»»~**»»»**»**»»*»»**»»
»* PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84850 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
»» SOURCE. ILCO
*• STATION ID- 4
** CASE.NO.: 21694 SASNO.: 8318D
* *
**************
06/ .,94
**»»**»**»******#*»»**»»»»**»» »»»
PROG ELEM" SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *»
CITY. LEEDS ST: AL **
COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 0845 STOP 32/68/08 JE *»
D NO : MD NO: 2479 **
* *
* * »
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
***F00TN0TES«**
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ATHENS, GA. 06/
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO 84851 SAMPLE TYPE' SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
SOURCE ILCO CITY. LEEDS ST: AL
STATION ID' 3 COLLECTION START- 03/01/94 0945 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
CASE NO.' 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D D NO.: MD NO: 2480
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
8 1 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC. CARBON
~•~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS jEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu. mTHENS, GA. 06/
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84852 SAMPLE TYPE' SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
SOURCE ILCO CITY- LEEDS ST- AL
STATION ID- 2 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1015 STOP: 32/68/08 JE
CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D D NO. MD NO' 2481
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.6 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
»*»FOOTNOTES*»*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu, ATHENS. GA.
06/.. , 94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316
SOURCE ILCO
STATION ID. 1
CASE.NO.- 21694
SAMPLE NO. 84853 SAMPLE TYPE SURFACEWA
SAS NO.: 8318D
* *
tti
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
CITY- LEEDS ST: AL
COLLECTION START. 03/01/94 1045 STOP: 32/68/08
D. NO.: MD NO: 2482
JE
* *
* * *
RESULTS UNITS
3 9 MG/L
PARAMETER
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
*»*FOOTNOTES»»*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS JiEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,, mTHENS, GA. 06/. , 94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
»** ***
»» PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO 84854 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *»
** SOURCE- ILCO CITY. LEEDS ST AL *»
** STATION ID- 0 COLLECTION START 03/01/94 1120 STOP. 32/68/08 JE **
** CASE.NO. 21694 SAS NO : 8318D D. NO.: MD NO: 2483 **
# ~ » *
+ It*************##**********
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1 6 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
* »'FOOTNOTES* * *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ATHENS. GA. 06/._/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO 94-0316 SAMPLE NO 84855 SAMPLE TYPE. SOIL PROG ELEM- SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER **
SOURCE: ILCO CITY' LEEDS ST. AL **
STATION ID: 0 COLLECTION START 03/01/94 1430 STOP: 32/68/08 JE **
CASE NO.' 21694 SAS NO ¦ 8318D D NO MD NO: 2484 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
10000 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
7A % SOLIDS
**'FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS JEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu . mTHENS, GA. 06/, .
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
I*#**************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO 84856 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER
SOURCE ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL
STATION ID' 5 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1510 STOP: 32/68/08 JE *
CASE NO.: 21694 SAS NO.. 8318D D. NO MD NO 2485
t * * * * *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
18000 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
58 % SOLIDS
»*»FOOTNOTES*»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS jEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESi,. ^THENS. GA. 06/. . 3
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»#»»**»»»»»»•»**»»*»»»»»*###»*»****»»*»>**»
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84857 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *
SOURCE: ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL *
STATION ID: 4 COLLECTION START 03/01/94 1540 STOP: 32/68/08 JE **
CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO ¦ 8318D D NO MD NO' 2486
*
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
12000 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
55 % SOLIDS
••~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AMD ANALYSIS GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESo, ATHENS. GA. 06/ . , 94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84858 SAMPLE TYPE SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY- B CARTER »*
SOURCE. ILCO CITY LEEDS ST: AL **
STATION ID- 3 COLLECTION START 03/01/94 1600 STOP: 32/68/08 JE »*
CASE.NO.' 21694 SAS NO.: 8318D D. NO. MD NO: 2487 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
4200 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
70 7. SOLIDS
***FOOTNOTES»*»
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS .GEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV Ebc. ATHENS. GA. 06, .,94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*»»»*»»»**»*«*«*»«**»*»***•»»»»»¦»:»¦»**»«******»»»****»*****»***»» »»*
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84859 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER »*
SOURCE ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL »*
STATION ID: 2 COLLECTION START' 03/01/94 1620 STOP' 32/68/08 JE **
CASE.NO.. 21694 SAS NO ¦ 8318D D NO.. MD NO: 2488 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
13000 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
53 % SOLIDS
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS 3EMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESu . ^THENS, GA. 06;. .J
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0316 SAMPLE NO. 84860 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B CARTER *
SOURCE' ILCO CITY: LEEDS ST: AL *
STATION ID- 1 COLLECTION START: 03/01/94 1655 STOP: 32/68/08 JE »*
CASE.NO.: 21694 SAS NO : 8318D D NO MD NO' 2489 *
t
***********************************'***'*****'*********'************'*
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
7400 MG/KG TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
71 % SOLIDS
•~~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------- |