Report on the Ecological Assessment of
Streams in the Vicinity of
General Electric/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site
March 1994
U.S. EPA, Region IV
Environmental Services Division
Ecological Support Branch
Athens, GA 30605
-------
1 of 22
Introduction
This document reports the findings of an ecological study conducted on Bat Fork Creek and
an unnamed tributary to Bat Fork Creek in the vicinity of the General Electric
(GE)/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site (hereafter referred to as the GE Site), East Flat Rock,
Henderson County, North Carolina. Previous studies reported by the North Carolina
Department of Health and Natural Resources (NCDEH&NR 1990) and the USEPA (1994)
indicated that potentially toxic compounds discharged by the GE plant may have entered Bat
Fork Creek. Studies (USEPA 1994) also indicated that a number of old GE waste disposal
and waste treatment sites located on three non-contiguous subsites (GE, Shepherd Farm, and
Seldon Clark) may be sources of toxic materials (USEPA 1994). Surface waters associated
with each subsite are as follows:
•Shepherd Farm Subsite - An unnamed stream (tributary to Bat Fork Creek) flows
adjacent to a 3 acre GE waste disposal area on the Shepherd Farm property.
•Seldon Clark Subsite - A ditch draining this 1 acre subsite (containing GE wastes)
carries water to Bat Fork Creek.
•GE Subsite - Bat Fork Creek drains this subsite. Numerous GE waste disposal
and waste treatment areas are located within the boundaries of this subsite.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of site-related contaminants on stream
biota in the vicinity of the GE subsites. The contaminants of concern (COC's) are
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's), heavy metals (primarily zinc and copper), acids, a
commercial biocide, and volatile organic compounds.
-------
2 of 22
Methods
On November 7-9, 1994 members of the Environmental Protection Agency Region IV,
Environmental Services Division visited the GE site. Based on a ground truth survey and
reconnaissance of the area conducted several weeks earlier, a total of 10 sampling locations
were selected for the current study - seven on Bat Fork Creek (stations 103, 104, 105, 106,
107, 108, and 109), two on the unnamed tributary (stations 101 and 102), and one on a ditch
draining the Seldon Clark subsite (station 110) (see map Fig. 1). Station 101 served as a
background station for the unnamed tributary. Stations 103 (upstream of confluence with the
unnamed tributary) and 105 (just upstream of the GE subsite) were chosen as background
stations on Bat Fork Creek. Surface water hydrology, land/water use, and wildlife resources
are discussed in the GE/Shepherd Farm RI/FS Workplan (USEPA 1994) and will not be
duplicated in this document. Photographs of sample stations are included in Appendix A.
At each sampling station, in-situ water chemistry was measured, water and sediment samples
were collected, and a Rapid Bioassessment Procedure (RBP) Protocol I (screening method for
detecting biological impairment) was conducted. Each RBP included a habitat assessment,
physico-chemical characterization, and a benthic macroinvertebrate survey. An attempt was
also made to collect fish at each station for tissue analysis.
At the time of collection, water and sediment samples were divided and portions of each
sample were labeled and packaged for transport to the appropriate laboratories for analysis.
Chain-of-custody was maintained throughout sampling, shipping and testing.
-------
Sampling Station
/N
N
Appromnatc Scale
0 500
11
Idon Clark
Tabor
Fork
104
Shepherd Farm
103
102
LOLL
Spring
Haven
Trailer Pic.
Oq j Unnamed Tributary
\ GSP!
Plant
108
/aste Treatment
Pond
107
Creek
0
Waste Treatment'
Pond
Figure 1. Sampling stations along streams in the vicinity o£ General Electric/Shepherd Farpi Superfund Site, East Flat Rock, North
Carolina. November 1994.
-------
4 of 22
Water Chemistry Measurements - In-situ Dissolved Oxygen (DO), pH, temperature, and
conductivity were measured using a calibrated Hydrolab® H20 Multiprobe. Alkalinity,
hardness, and turbidity were determined later (within 72 hrs.) in the laboratory using EPA
approved methods (APHA 1992).
Water and Sediment Sampling - was conducted according to EPA standard operating
procedures (USEPA 1991). At the time of collection, each sample was split as follows:
Water
2 - 40 ml glass vials (for volatile organics)
1 - 1 liter polyethylene bottle (for metals)
1 - 500 ml polyethylene bottle (for TOC-total organic carbon)
1 - 500 ml polyethylene bottle (for turbidity)
1-4 liter amber glass jar (for pesticides/extractable organics)
1-4 liter cubitainer (for toxicity testing)
Sediment
1 - 2 oz. glass jar (for volatile organics)
1 - 8 oz. glass jar (for metals)
1 - 8 oz. glass jar (for pesticides and extractable organics)
1 - 8 oz. glass jar (for TOC)
1-1 liter glass jar (for toxicity testing)
1 - whirl pack (for sediment sizing)
Immediately after collection, samples were stored on wet ice. Because chemical data is often
essential for interpretation of toxicity test results, samples were collected for a full scan of
chemical analyses as well as for toxicity testing. However, just prior to this ecological
study, US EPA Environmental Compliance Branch collected sediment and water from these
streams for chemical analyses as part of the Remedial Investigation/Feasability Study. To
-------
5 of 22
prevent excessive cost to the laboratories and duplication of effort, samples collected during
this ecological investigation were held pending results of toxicity tests. A clear toxic
response by toxicity test organisms would merit chemical analysis of sediment and water
samples.
Toxicity Tests - were conducted according to EPA Region IV Ecological Support Branch
standard operating procedures (USEPA 1993). Samples were kept at 4° C until toxicity tests
were initiated. Tests on water samples were initiated within 72 hours of sample collection.
Tests on sediment samples were initiated within 6 weeks of sample collection. The following
tests were performed on water and sediment samples:
Water samples
Ceriodaphnia 7-day Survival/Reproduction Test (SOP XV)
Selenastrum capricornutum 96 hr Growth Test (SOP XX)
Microtox® Basic Test
Sediment samples
Ceriodaphnia 7-day Whole Sediment Test (SOP XV A)
Lettuce Seed (Lactuca sativa) Germination Test (SOP XVIII)
Microtox Basic Test (performed on sediment pore water)
Toxicity tests were conducted in the EPA Region IV toxicity laboratory in Athens, Georgia.
Rapid Bioassessments - were conducted according to EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for
Use in Streams and Rivers (USEPA 1989). A representative sample of benthic organisms
from each sampling station was preserved in alcohol future reference.
-------
6 of 22
Fish Collections - were made using a Smith-Root Type VII backpack electroshocking unit.
Stunned fish were collected in a decontaminated fish net, handled with latex gloves, placed in
a clean plastic bag, and placed on wet ice. Within 48 hrs of collection, the species
composition of each sample was noted and recorded and the fish were frozen.
Subsequently, frozen fish from each sampling station were ground to a powder, subdivided
into two portions (one portion wrapped in plastic, the other in aluminum foil), and then
transported frozen to the appropriate laboratory for chemical analysis.
Results
Water Chemistry - The results of in-situ water measurements (supplemented by laboratory
determinations of water alkalinity, hardness, and turbidity), are summarized in Table 1.
Toxicity Tests - The results of toxicity tests conducted on water and sediment samples are
summarized in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. Copies of laboratory bench sheets for each test
are included in Appendix B.
Cladoceran (Ceriodaphnia dubia) 7-day Survival/Reproduction Test
None of the surface water samples collected on Bat Fork Creek and its unnamed
tributary were toxic to Ceriodaphnia. Adult survival and reproduction in all test
samples was not significantly different from survival and reproduction in laboratory
control water. None of the on-site sediment samples were toxic to Ceriodaphnia.
-------
7 of 22
Table 1. Water quality measurements for streams in the vicinity of General Electric East Flat Rock, North Carolina.
November 1994.
Sampling
Stations
Station
Description
Stream Water Quality data
In-situ measurements
Laboratory determinations
Temperature
(C°)
Dissolved
02 (mg/I)
PH
Conductivity
(^mhos/cm2)
Turb.
(NTU)
Alk.
Hardness
(mg/I CaCO,)
GE-101-SW
Background for
Unnamed Tributary
12.7
8.52
6.47
35.2
3.8
12
12
GE-102-SW
Unnamed Tributary
11.0
8.74
6.41
42.5
2.4
12
16
GE-103-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Spring Haven Trailer Park
9.9
7.69
6.25
24.9
6.2
7
8
GE-104-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Shepherd Farm
9.3
8.49
6.29
28.1
9.1
7
9
GE-105-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Background for GE Site
10.1
8.81
6.16
43.2
3.4
9
14
GE-106-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Inside GE Site
11.0
9.53
6.57
61.2
5.0
9
18
GE-107-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Below GE Discharge
9.2
13.72
7.19
442
14.8
18
20
GE-108-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Downstream of Sta. 107
10.9
11.67
6.61
349
13.3
20
18
GE-109-SW
Bat Fork Creek
Downstream of GE Site
11.0
9.82
6.56
70.8
5.9
12
18
GE-110-SW
Ditch on Seldon Clark Site
13.9
2.31
6.50
404
21.7
187
226
-------
8 of 22
Table 2. Summary of results of toxicity tests on surface water samples collected from
streams near General Electric, East Flat Rock, NC. November 1994.
Sample
ID #
Sampling
Location
Ceriodaphnia
7 day Chronic
Algae Growth
(mean cell density in
fluorometer units)
Microtox
LC501
(% sample)
Adult
Survival
Average
ff Young
GE-101-SW
Background for Unnamed Tributary
10
23.4
3.21
>100
GE-102-SW
Unnamed Tributary
10
24.6
2.99
>100
GE-103-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Spring Haven Trailer Park
10
37.2
4.08
> 100
GE-104-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Shepherd Farm
9
37.7
4.01
>100
GE-105-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Background for GE Site
10
31.2
3.33
>100
GE-106-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Inside GE Site
9
31.2
4.06
>100
GE-107-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of GE Discharge
10
35.5
0.63
> 100
GE-108-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of Station 107
9
34.1
0.78
>100
GE-109-SW
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of GE Site
10
32.6
2.68
>100
GE-110-SW
Ditch on Seldon Clark Subsite
10
33.7
3.00
>100
CONTROL
DMW
10
24.62/31.33
3.39
>100
1 - LC50 values calculated from 5 minute readings.
2 - Control for samples 101 through 105.
3 - Control for samples 106 through 110.
-------
9 of 22
Table 3. Summary of results of toxicity tests on sediment samples collected from streams
near General Electric, East Flat Rock, NC. November 1994.
Sample
ID ft
Sampling
Location
Ceriodaphania
7 day Chronic
Lettuce Seed
Germination
(% germination)
Microtox
LC502
(% Sam pie)
Adult
Survival
Average
# Young
GE-101-SD
Background for Unnamed Tributary
8
22.2
26
> 100
GE-102-SD
Unnamed Tributary
10
28.6
86
>100
GE-103-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Spring Haven Trailer Park
10
16.7
88
>100
GE-104-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Shepherd Farm
10
22.5
63
83.3
GE-105-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Background for GE Site
8
22.6
65
>100
GE-106-SD
Bat fork Creek - Inside GE Site
10
37.9
86
>100
GE-107-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of GE Discharge
9
33.6
73
> 100
GE-108-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of Station 107
10
30.1
90
> 100
GE-109-SD
Bat Fork Creek - Downstream of GE Site
10
26.6
83
>100
GE-110-SD
Ditch on Seldon Clark Subsite
9
29.0
49
>100
CONTROL
DMW
10
24.52/32.33
80
> 100
1 - LC50 values calculated from 5 minute readings.
2 - Control for samples 101 through 105.
3 - Control for samples 106 through 110.
-------
10 of 22
One off-site sediment (station 103) caused a significant reduction in the number of
young produced when compared to control sediment.
Freshwater Algae (Selenastrum capricornutum) 96 hr Growth Test
Not all algal test data could be analyzed statistically. At the termination of the test,
several flasks containing growing algae were found to have caps sealed to the mouth
of the flask by a film of condensed moisture, thereby cutting off gaseous C02
exchange to the atmosphere and severely limiting algal growth in those specific flasks.
If these "outliers" were ignored and mean growth in the remaining flasks examined
(Table 2, Appendix B), there appeared to be an inhibition of algal growth in samples
from stations immediately downstream of the point where the GE waste treatment
pond discharges into Bat Fork Creek (stations 107 and 108). Statistically this
observation could not be confirmed. However, test data from three other sampling
stations, 105, 106 and 109, could be statistically analyzed. Station 105 is the
background station for the GE plant site, station 106 is on-site but above the discharge
point for the treatment ponds, and station 109 is immediately downstream of the plant
site. Statistical analysis showed that the toxicity of surface water entering and leaving
the GE site was not statistically different and that no toxicity was detected.
Lettuce Seed (Lactuca sativa) Germination Test
Seed germination was significantly reduced in sediment from stations 101 and 110.
Station 101 was at the headwaters of the unnamed tributary (above the Shepherd Farm
-------
11 of 22
dump site); station 110 was taken from the ditch draining the Seldon Clark subsite.
None of the on-site samples (stations 106, 107, and 108) or remaining samples from
Bat Fork Creek and the unnamed tributary inhibited seed germination.
Microtox® (Photobacterium phosphoreum) Basic Test
Microtox tests did not detect toxicity in any of the surface water samples collected on
Bat Fork Creek and its unnamed tributary. Pore water from only one sediment
sample showed a slight toxic effect. This sample was taken from station 104 on Bat
Fork Creek (Shepherd Farm).
Rapid Bioassessments - The results of RBI's conducted on Bat Fork Creek and its unnamed
tributary are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4 summarizes the results of the Benthic
Macroinvertebrate Surveys conducted at each sampling location; Table 5 summarizes and
compares scores for the Habitat Assessments conducted at each sampling station. Habitat
scores for all stations were generally high except for station 110. This station received a
lower score because of channelization and a general lack of suitable habitat. Station 110 is a
drainage ditch. Copies of field data sheets are included in Appendix C.
Fish Tissue Analysis - The results of fish tissue analyses are shown in Table 6. Shaded areas
indicate levels of PCB's in whole body fish considered harmful based on information
reported by Eisler (1986). A list of fish species collected at each sampling station is
included Appendix C.
-------
12 of 22
Table 4. Macrobenthos qualitative sample list for 10 stream
sampling stations in the vicinity of General
Electric/Shepherd Farm Superfund site, East Flat Rock,
North Carolina. November 7-8, 1994.
Relative Abundance: R = rare (< 3) C = Common (3 -9) A = Abundant (> 10) D = Dominant (> 50)
TAXON
station
101
station
102
station
103
station
104
station
105
station
106
station
107
station
108
station
109
station
110
Porifera
Hydro zoa
Platyhelminthes
Tubellaria
Hirudinea
R
R
Oligochaeta
C
R
C
C
C
C
C
Isopoda
C
R
C
R
R
Amphipoda
C
Decapoda
C
C
C
C
C
C
Gastropoda
C
R
R
C
Bivalvia
Anisoptera
R
C
R
R
C
C
C
R
Zygoptera
C
A
C
A
A
C
C
Hemiptera
R
R
Coleoptera
R
R
C
R
C
C
A
Lepidoptera
Sialidae
Corydalidae
R
Tipulidae
C
C
R
R
C
R
R
R
R
Empididae
Simuliidae
C
C
A
A
R
Tabanidae
Culicidae
R
R
R
R
R
R
Chironimidae
c
c
A
A
C
R
C
A
A
D
Plecoptera
A
c
C
C
A
C
Ephemeroptcra
A
A
C
C
R
R
R
Tricoptera
A
A
C
D
A
C
R
R
-------
13 of 22
Table 5. Comparison of habitat quality for sampling stations on Bat Fork Creek and an unnamed tributary in the vicinity of General
Electric/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. November 1994.
SAMPLING STATIONS
Habitat Assessment
Station #
Station Description
Score
Habitat
Condition
%
Compatibility
to Background
Compatibility
Assessment
101
Background for Unnamed
Tributary
99
Good
100
-
102
Unnamed Tributary
114
Excellent
115
Comparable
103
Bat Fork Creek
(Spring Haven Trailer Park)
119
Excellent
-
-
104
Bat Fork Creek
Shepherd Farm
115
Excellent
-
-
105
Bat Fork Creek
Background for GE Site
125
Excellent
100
-
106
Bat Fork Creek
Inside GE Site
94
Good
75
Supporting
107
Bat Fork Creek
Downstream of GE Discharge
111
Excellent
88
Supporting
108
Bat Fork Creek
Downstream of Sta.107
120
Excellent
96
Comparable
109
Bat Fork Creek
Downstream of GE Site
117
Excellent
94
Comparable
110
Ditch on Seldon Clark Subsite
31
Poor
-
-
-------
14 of 22
Table 6. Results of fish tissue analyses, GE/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site, East Flat Rock,
North Carolina.
Sampling
Station
Pesticides
(mg/kg)
Metals
(mg/kg)
DDE
PCB-1248
PCB-1016
Copper
Zinc
102
0.050U
0.32J
0.030
1.7
34
103
0.050U
0.49
0.45U
0.88
39
104
0.051U
0.49
0.45U
0.91
39
105
0.18
1.6
1.5U
0.95
39
106
0.12
1.4C
1.0U
1.2
42
107
0.061
1.4C
1.0U
1.0U
26
108
0.093
1.9C
1.5U
0.86
44
109
0.19
2.8C
2.5U
0.95
31
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
C-Confirmed by GC/MS.
shaded values - Exceed levels of concern for total PCB residues (0.4 mg/kg fresh weight) in
whole body fish (Eisler 1986).
-------
15 of 22
Discussion/Conclusion
GE subsite
With one exception, there was no clear indication of toxicity in
water and sediment collected from the three sampling stations
(stations 106, 107, and 108) located on the GE plant site. The
single exception was the apparent inhibition of algae growth in
surface water collected from stations 107 and 108 (see results
section above). Water entering (station 105) and leaving
(station 109) the GE site was not toxic to any test organism.
The apparent on-site toxicity to algae may be a result of
elevated copper and zinc levels reported (NCDEH&NR 199 0) in the
effluent discharged into Bat Fork Creek from the treatment ponds
(see map Fig 1). The effluent enters Bat Fork Creek just above
station 107. The conductivity of stream water at stations 107
and 108 was a magnitude higher than for water at station 106
immediately upstream of the discharge point, indicating some kind
of ionic input at the point of discharge. Chemical analyses,
when available, should be able to confirm or dismiss the presence
of inhibitory levels of copper and zinc in water from station 107
and 108.
Another possible explanation for the apparent inhibition of test
algae in water from station 107 and 108 may not be related to
chemical toxicity. During sampling, the effluent entering Bat
Fork Creek from the treatment ponds was observed to be bright
-------
16 of 22
green in color. When mixed with water from Bat Fork Creek, the
creek water in turn became green. Microscopic examination of the
water samples from stations 107 and 108 revealed that the green
color was caused by native algae - predominately Scenedesmus sp.
A high density of ciliated protozoa was also observed in these
samples. The protozoa were not observed in upstream samples 106
and 105. It is possible that the lack of test algae growth in
surface water from stations 107 and 108 was the result of either
biological inhibition mediated by allelopathic chemicals produced
by the dominant Scenedesmus or a result of consumption by the
ciliated protozoa. To test this hypothesis, a second set of
algae tests were conducted in which surface water from stations
107 and 108 was filtered through glass wool before test algae
were introduced (see Appendix B). Microscopic examination of
filtered samples revealed that filtering effectively removed
nearly all ciliated protozoa and also some of the native algae.
Filtered and unfiltered samples were run side by side with
filtered and unfiltered controls. The same technical problem was
experienced with these tests as was encountered in the original
set of tests (see p. 10). However, disregarding "outlier" data
points, mean cell density showed clear-cut trends. Filtering
control water resulted in a slightly lower cell density,
indicating that perhaps filtering removed some nutrients or, less
likely, that some toxic material was washed from the glass wool
during filtration. In contrast, mean cell density in filtered
samples of water from stations 107 and 108 was higher than in
-------
17 of 22
unfiltered samples, indicating that some filterable component was
responsible for the inhibition of algae growth in the unfiltered
samples. In this case the filterable component appeared to be
biological. Therefore, biological factors could have contributed
to the lack of test algae growth observed in water samples from
on-site stations 107 and 108. However, growth of test algae in
filtered samples 107 and 108 was still noticeably less than
growth in control water, suggesting the presence of another
algae-inhibiting component. In this case, that component could
be the allelopathic substance or a site-derived chemical.
Rapid Bioassessments conducted on Bat Fork Creek confirm that the
creek is being impacted at on-site stations 107 and 108.
Although the quality of the habitat at 108, for example, was
comparable to that of the background (station 105), there was a
conspicuous lack of sensitive stream organisms, namely
Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and
Trichoptera (caddis flies), or EPT's. The habitat at station 107
was slightly less comparable, being rated as "supportive".
Comparing it with station 106, also rated as "supportive," we see
fewer EPTs. Again the impact may not be totally due to toxicity.
The "greening" of the creek water at stations 107 and 108
suggests an enrichment or eutrophication. The water quality at
these stations is more reminiscent of a pond than a stream
environment. EPT's are often scarce or absent in ponds.
-------
18 of 22
At the time this study was conducted, impacts to Bat Fork Creek
resulting from effluent discharged by the GE site appeared to be
minimal. The stream was recovering by the time the water flowed
off-site past station 109. At this station the higher
conductivity seen at stations 107 and 108 had dropped to a level
near that of station 106 located above the discharge point, water
or sediment samples from station 109 were not toxic to any of the
test animals, algal growth was not inhibited, and EPT's were
returning to the stream.
Shepherd Farm and Seldon Clarke subsites
Outside the GE plant site, no surface water samples prompted a
toxic response from any of the toxicity test organisms. However,
four sediment samples appeared to adversely affect at least one
test organism. Reduced production of young was observed in
Ceriodaphnia exposed to sediment from station 103, lettuce seed
germination was significantly reduced in sediment from station
101 and 110, and the Microtox test gave a slight toxic response
to sediment pore water from station 104. With the exception of
station 110, none of these sporadic toxic responses (outside of
the GE subsite boundaries) can be directly attributed to current
or former activities by GE. Station 101 lies on the unnamed
tributary upstream of the Shepherd Farm dump site. Chemical
analysis of sediment from this location revealed measurable
amounts of toluene and some indication of petroleum products (see
Appendix D). The presence of these chemicals suggests that paint
-------
19 of 22
thinners, gasoline, used motor oil, or some other form of
petroleum products may have been dumped near the stream at the
end of the cul-de-sac in the trailer park. Station 103 is
located on the upper reaches of Bat Fork Creek at the downhill
boundary of Spring Haven trailer park. It does not receive
direct drainage from the Shepherd Farm dump site. The source of
toxicity at this station again may be the result of local
dumping. Similarly, the slight toxicity exhibited by sediment
from station 104, which is located in the pasture of the current
Shepherd Farm property, may reflect the presence of residual
material derived from farm operations (herbicides, hydraulic
fluids etc.). Sediment from station 105, which is downstream of
104 and just above the GE plant site, was not toxic to any of the
toxicity test organisms. The remaining sediment that exhibited
toxicity is from station 110 on the Seldon Clark subsite. The
suspected toxicity to lettuce seeds exhibited by this sample may
be site derived. The sediment was collected from a ditch
draining a buried dump site on the Seldon Clark property.
However, a large iron grate at the head of the ditch and next to
the road again raises the possibility that the toxicity may be
derived from road runoff or periodic dumping of materials into
the ditch by local residents. Chemical data, when available,
should help identify the source of toxicity at this location as
well as at the other locations mentioned above.
-------
20 of 22
Fish Tissue
Chemical analyses of fish tissue revealed detectable levels of
DDE (Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene) and PCB's (Polychlorinated
Biphenyls) in whole body (forage) fish collected from stream
sample stations near the GE Subsite (Table 6).
DDE, a metabolite of the organochlorine insecticide DDT
(Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane), was present in fish collected
at stations 105 through 109. DDT, widely used throughout the
world from 1940 until 1973, was banned by the US EPA and declared
an environmental hazard due to its chemical stability
(persistence) and its solubility in fatty tissue. Due to
widespread use, DDT and DDE (as a breakdown product of DDT) have
over the years been slowly released into the environment.
Although present in fish tissue collected near the GE Subsite,
DDE is not considered a contaminant of concern for the
GE/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site.
PCB's, a group of synthetic halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons,
were used extensively in the electricity generating industry
until 1979 when legislation prohibited their manufacture and use
in the United States (Eisler 1986). PCB's are toxic compounds
that are highly persistent and fat soluble, properties that lead
to accumulation in the environment and biomagnification in the
food chain. Eisler (1986) indicated that among sensitive
species, total PCB residues in excess of 0.4 mg/kg in whole body
-------
21 of 22
fish were demonstrably harmful and should be considered evidence
of significant PCB contamination.
PCB's are a contaminant of concern for the GE/Shepherd Farm
Superfund Site. As shown in Table 6, PCB-1248 was present at all
stations where fish were collected, but concentrations were
highest in the vicinity of the GE subsite. Whole body fish
concentrations reported nationwide for PCB 1248 averaged 0.15,
0.14, and 0.8 mg/kg during 1976-1977, 1978-1979, and 1980-1981,
respectively (Eisler 1986). Concentrations of PCB 1248 near the
GE subsite ranged from 1.4 to 2.8 mg/kg, while the background
concentration (station 103) was 0.49 mg/kg. Station 103 was
considered a more suitable background than station 105 (toxicity
background) for comparison of fish data. Station 105 was less
suitable because of the short distance between stations 105 and
106 and the unimpeded movement of fish between those stations.
Fish tissue data collected during this study has confirmed the
presence of PCB's as an environmental concern in streams near the
GE Subsite, but this data does not target the specific source of
contaminants. Sediment and water chemical data, when available,
should help delineate the source(s) of PCB's and other
contaminants.
-------
22 of 22
REFERENCES
APHA. 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 18th Edition. Greenberg, A.E., L.S. Clesceri,
and A. D, Eaton, eds. American Public Health Association,
American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution
Control Federation. 1015 Fifteenth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20005.
Eisler, R. 1986. Polychlorinated biphenyl hazards to fish,
wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. U.S. Fish
Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85(1.7). 72 pp.
NCDEH&NR. 1990. General Electric-Hendersonville Toxicity
Examination, NPDES # NC0000507, Basin 040302. North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources; Water Quality Section. January 1990.
USEPA. 1994. General Electric/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site,
RI/FS Workplan. August 1994. U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IV, Athens, GA.
USEPA. 1993. Region IV Ecological Support Branch Standard
Operating Procedures for Hazardous Waste Site
Investigations. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IV Environmental Services Division, Athens,
GA, and prepared by ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc.,
Environmental Services Assistance Team, Athens, GA.
USEPA. 1991. Environmental Compliance Branch Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Environmental
Services Division, College Station Road, Athens, GA 30613.
USEPA. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams
and Rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Assessment and Watershed Protection Division. 401 M Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.
-------
APPENDIX A
Photographs of Stream Sampling Stations
-------
r-i
Photo 1. Station 101, Unnamed Stream (background),
upstream of Shepherd Farm waste disposal
subsite. Photo taken facing upstream.
Photo 2. Station 102, Unnamed Stream downstream
of Shepherd Farm waste disposal subsite.
Photo taken facing upstream.
-------
Photo 3.
Station 103, Bat Fork Creek. Photo taken facing upstream.
Photo 4. Station 104, Bat Fork Creek, downstream of confluence
with Unnamed Tributary. Photo taken facing upstream.
-------
Kioto 5. Station 105, Bat Fork Creek, upstream of the General
Electric subsite. Photo taken facing downstream.
Photo 6.
Station 106, Bat Fork Creek. Photo taken facing downstream.
-------
Photo 7. Station 107, Bat Fork Creek, downstream of General Electric
effluent discharge. Photo taken facing upstream.
Photo 8. Station 108, Bat Fork Creek. Photo taken facing upstream.
-------
Photo 9. Station 109, Bat Fork Creek, north of Tabor
Road. Photo taken facing downstream.
Photo 10.
Station 110, ditch draing the Seldon Clark
subsite. Photo taken facing downstream.
-------
APPENDIX B
Toxicity Test Bench Sheets
-------
2_
sor xv
ReTlsion No. 4
Dale: September 10,1993
Pate: 18 of 20
SUMMARY DATA
Industry/Study: GE
Locution:
11
Dole:
Analyst: -tAui
/ 4 \ U W
/a 3o
>\e s
Said pit $
and/or
CeDeeolritloo
K«|Uc*i»
Number
of Younj
Number of
Surviving
Adulii
Young fxr
Aduli
D»y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
V
V
V
v'
V
w
k'
>/
O
-
(Ldv^'oI
OtMwJ
2
v'
~
V
V
X/
1/
V
V
C"
~
o
3
4
Ic
fe
b"
t,
$¦
V
r
v/
Hi
4
~
V
L
10
~
3
1
5
s
n/
v/
9-
fe
V
y
e
13
^ i-
'3
cl
11
1 D
/ O
1 c
11
1 01?
7
y/
V
v/
?-
11
\/
w
~
Tot ft!
at
3-T
3-u
XI
7-1
K>
Mb
to
gf
1 o»ws
1
v'
1/
v'
~
V
>/
i/
V
Vv
v>
c
1
~
V
V
w'
V
v'
v'
V
l/
O
3
r
to
S-
4
b~
ir
(r
4
b
I
H ?
4 .
>y
ic
1~
V
1
1
1^
30
S
-f
S
s
V
0
V/
^'
V
¦Air
6
1 2-
13
V
l"5-
v'
1 0
I 7
1
vy
/ o
7
V
3
V
N
L.
/1
V
.3
•/
TolaJ
P-H-
"2-1?
/•?-
3?
If
liT
Hi
7-t
M
M-<5
to | as. v
6E
10'1'UX
1
~
i/'
V
i/
\s'
i'
(/
o
2
i/
V
v'
v'
i -
k'
0
3
t
fe"~
7-
(fr
L
t.
L
i
ir
s-S
4
I/'
(p
1/
1
V
1/
i
>/
Zo
S
7
5
s
7
1
y
v/
*7
SI
t
13
ti
1i_
11
¦<\;
IX
ll
11
~
<\o
7
i/
\T-
i
3
v/
V
~
V
~
11
To*»J
zu
Hi
zfe la? | it» l /r I -2.3
•2-S- 113
2-4G>
10
¦zi.ip
GC
I o?
1
w''
V
V
V
V
~
\J
O
2
V
\S
V
c-
V
\S
t/
O
3
S"
'}
M
V'
5"
iT
L
fo
so
4
f|
IC
V
~
(/
s
~
l
V/
2-7-
5
V/'
iy
v/
f?
1 0
/ o
cf
; /
;»
?
S
«
/S"
/to
/3
'i
l 2.
12-
1 c
11
11
1 IS-
7
1 2-
W
9
/ i
'7
11
<3
/ 2-
/ o/
<~
fe
3
/c
,1
S
' 0
M
1 1
« I
1 2.
/ 2.
M
/c/
t
1 3
1J-
II
/ -z-
1/
'4
1 U
'H
//r
7
t/
'1
II
1 3
/ts
?
1/
/"&'
VD
Total
3io
3<1
¦31
6~0
"33
3-fO
*
37.^
G£
I o Vv/JS
1
i/
~
V
~
~
~
~
~
k'
o
I
~"
~
\y'
~
w
V
v.-
w-
i/
o
3
3
S~
£~
3
Y
)
5"
U
.^7
4
x/
V
V
!/
£>"
-z-
7-
5
1 o
*
i"
r
/ 0
M
<
11-
M
1 o
1 -2-
/ 4
S
"f
i
-------
P2^2- SOP XV
ReTuion No. 4
Dale: September 10,1993
Page: 18 of 20
SUMMARY DATA
Industry/Study: G-t Dale: )' I j 9 y
Location: Analyst: - M u.'
(jOou^Ot Sr—-pl-es
SfcmpU /
•ad/or
Concentration
Kcpliralt
Number
of Yount
Nuabtr of
SorrlTini
Adulic
Young per
A dull
D"/
1
2
3
4
. .5
<
7
8
9
10
1
1/
V
~
1/
t.-
u'
~
O
-
2
~
V
w'
«¦
V-
V
~
n
CervvVviA
3
1/
H
V/
Ic
M
¦?
F
U
m
4
T-
V/
>/
\/
cl
1/
V
V
21
5
9
?
V
IO
1 O
S
V
7-
%
H
ip3
<
1
11—
13
1 O
) z-
M
!c-
/?>
11-
loo
7
V
1
11
IU
IT-
\y
n
'\r.
iX
IS
Total
T.-X-
13
3Y
3<)
¦2*
^3
=!a- Ivz.
2-1
3^ "
IO
3|-3
Gf
lottos
1
~
>/
V
k/
~
V
V
*
v v
v'
0
2
i/'
V
v'
w
V
W
V/
6
3
V
S"
3
c
b"
V
r
5"
3b
4
r
v/
le
V
v/
/
¦3
10
V
-2-fc
J
I
~
7
1
C1
cl
v/
~
S4
6
\ *3—
11-
1 c
Total
2-to
"3 0
J-S"
1
33
Zfe»
%?l
3i. 2_
&e
1
~
O
~
c
1/
1/
v
0
2
V
1/
V
1/
»/
s
0
3
~
(s
y
V
?
y/
?
fa
\/
1/
2-"?
5
T
t O
1^
> O
U
\/
V
<7
10
10
«
?
14
13
1 ^
•)¦©
If
13
1-2-
l|
ll
111
7
V/
K3
\T-
'4
?-
/
13
14
IS"
V
Total | lg
^ \*s | w | 30
3i -133 U/
3<7 1 1 3?S" 1 / O I3S-.S"
&£
1
~
1/
~
V
~
V
~
1/
~
O
2
V
~
»'
k
v'
V
V
~
O
3
L>
Cp
?•
T
4
In
er
\
V5"
4
V
5?
L1
v
V
\
v'
/«"
3
10
'1
\/
V
• 1/
I -z-
b
5"
?
Si
6
'fT
't
X
iH
13
3
lo
lo
1 t>
/o?
7
~
13
* 15
IH
|T-
.'¦?
IS
'4
I
«?•?-
Total
3 0
V*
1 0
%
"B
?
4u
6
II
1 (/">
is-
fT
II n
l¥
-1
//7
7
10
/ 3
|i
3
H
ll
7/
~
v/
»/
ft
2
/
v'
s
V
•V
v'
V
V
V
0
3
/
S"
5"
lo
r
.T
4
S~
S"
1
HI
4
H
v'
/
V
1
~
7-
1
3
11
?
/u
/ 0
)o
1 O
I'-
9-2.
<
1
1
IT
1 3
/«"
'V-
IH
1'¦>
ll
/O
/ 7"
7
i/
llr,
1
IS"
/7-
IT-
1,^
~
Vo 1 ^ViTl -V/ 1 1
2 3
Z/ 1 33?
lo
33.?
/ " T«l erfuilam X *» T«l •rfuilim imi t • Hwmkvf wt On 7*vn| -# * Number of )wrt| M ¦ Lett «r mlulng 4 • MaJ*
Figure XV.4 Shorl-Terni Chronic Toxicity Test -- Cladoceran Summary Data
-------
(ht1-
SOP XV
RemSoa No. 4
Dale: September 10,1993
Page: 18 of 20
SUMMARY DATA
Industry/Study:
Location:
Dole: //// i> fgy
Analyst: ¦ R..
Susplt t
ud/or
Coaecnlrsiloa
Htpllcalt
Number
or Yount
Nuaber of
Surrlvl&i
Adukj
Youn| per
A dull
1
2
3
4
. .J
t
7
8
9
10
OMu)
l
v/
V
~
v>'
y/
~
(X
t/
O
-
2
~
V
~
S
¦>'
~
t/
~
O
3
V
3
5*
s
le
L>
\/
V
*/
~
10
4
*1
\/
~
*/
V
~
1
M
i"
Lo
2®
i
1 0
7-
1 o
1 o
?
f O
8
\
P7
6
°\
V
-V
*/
yS
7'
tp
II
T-
3r
7
v/
<\
/ o
I'd
1 v
1 7-
V2-
5IX
Total
23
Xi
2-o
aq
3.?
2«|
1 2.
¦Zs-
m r
/ O
&e
lot %D
1
V
~
V
v'
k'
V
i'
i'
V
a
2
V
\/
V
i/
\S
i'
V
o
3
3
r?
V
H
Z-
y
1
y/
W
i3
4
y'
3
M
v/
"3
/
r
i a-
S
fT
*?
i
>
M
\o
¦?
6
//
F
t-
?
1
fT
5>
7
?
/'Z-
L
1
'f
/
SC
To(i]
5-fc.
at
—
.50-
lc!
n
il 1 —
?-o
ns
Gt
loisO
1
~
~
~
~
~
s
o
2
V
~
v'
~
V
V
V
~
~
i/
o
3
£
?>
:3.
H
6'
•7'
Y,
31
4
y
v/
\
~
"3
v
w/
V/
*
J
?
/<
7
t?~
'2
?
11
n
13
V
/«>3
Total
3 S" 133 |33L
33 1 /
v/
"2_
•2.
v/
V
~
13
4
7
*/
1
~
V/
\/
~
3
\/
~
11
3
/
-z.
2-
'V
3
¦i
1
5-
6
11
L>
3
to
io
V
(u
7
(ij
7
'3
M
I
1
1 0
f /
7_
?
~
Total
/V
?
/1
at
' ^r
11
II
y t-7-
/ o
/le- T"
Cr if
/oq Si>
1
v
~
y/
v/
~
~
~
i/
~
o
2
v'
~
V
~
~
~
v'
~
~
3
~
H
3
~
fi
5"
>y
3
^0
4
3
f
V
•2.
s/
/
~
~
7-
3
(e
1
?
b
7
L>
'f
1*
(
M
S
(a
1
U>
le
/O
1 5"
7
/2-
)%
?
1
~
5~
x/
~
V
M0
Total
3c;
?Y
P-IT
11
11*
i2-l
1\
2.^
i 2 T
/ Q
Pls.st
Gt
/c£"SJ>
1
¦y
~
~
~
~
V
i/
O
1
V
~
~
V
\/
~
V
O
3
4
3
~
3
>/
v'
v'
V
n
4
5*
~
M
V
1
r
U>
5"
¦2-Z-
5
?
S"
1 c
?
V3-
6
?
//
V
Id
Jp
?
; p
/
L 2,
7
\o
.9
/
/
!
-2-
~
s
iV
1 1
t~$r+ i:
~ " T«t tfl« X » T««l opnlim 4mt I - Numbw erf n« -* - NumbrT imi fount M » Lml m mtulng t » Malt
Figure XV.4 Short-Term Chronic Toxicity Test -- Cladoceran Summary Data
-------
p2- 2-
sorxv
RtTitloa No. 4
Dote: September 10,1993
Page: 18 of 20
SUMMARY DATA
Induslry/Sluity:
Location:
Dnlc: "/ici9¥
Analyst: ft. • L e ip's
Sample /
ud/or
Coocenlralloo
Da/
KcpUc al •
Number
of Youb|
Number of
Surviving
Adult*
Yould| ptr
A dull
1
2
3
4
. .5
6
7
a
9
10
1
V
~
v*
V
*¦
~
y
~
\y
0
3
H
H
S-
"i
"2>
6,
5"
3
"3
H
40
DkM.Ui
4
¦ir
l o
s"
"8
%
1
1
s
~
\/
5"
I 0
1 0
13-
1
2-
?
<
V
)
17-
1 l
' O
«?
(01
7
1*
1
1 3
I 3L
1?
f («
15-
) *
y
S"
1 1 1
Toll!
3s
IS~
3\
3 0
H 1-
3S"
?S"
"3-2 2,
1 O
3a. b
1 OfeS£>
1
~
V
~
»/
y
V
y
w-'
O
1
w
yy
y
f
w
~
O
3
£~
2
fT
3
H
S"
M
w
4 1
4
7-
t
5"
7-
51
9
rf
n 1
3
v
In
t 0
/n
?
l
/
/
^ 0
5Tf,
i
7?
.?
4
V
1 2-
1 7_
"3
/¦a.
1 <4
7
/s"
11
/4
) 2-
W
/V*
IX
/4
14
/fa
1 37
Total
4 1
"2^
3?
Vq
?S
^0 | q 0
4 2-
?, 7^
'0 im^i
&€
lO^SD
I
V
v'
\S
~
V/
v
1/
\s
0
1
V/
•y
\y
V
V
0
3
v/
V
V
L
£~
lo
4
<4
6
¥
M 3
4
I/'
?-
tf
7
h
7-
?
J
\/
/
/O
/
3
~
1
V
V
1
17
«
V/
**
1
-7-
11~
1 ~L-
?
y
(.?
•???
7
~
/-o
1 '
11
7-
/T-
5"
) 1
ll*
/o
Total |
30
|3 3-
^0
3 3-
2>f>
V 0
3 0 3-
1
G€"
1 08 Sp
I
>/
v/
v/
~
v/
»/
%s
v/
v/
x/
&
1
\J
J
~
v/
t/
1/
V
i/
v/
~
0
3
\
S
3-
5"
r
u>
3
5"
V
Mo
4
s
is
•>
>
°1
?-
7
7-
9-
t/
b- 5
5
1/
1
\/
1
1/
~
/
y
l
7
/ 3
6
n-
n
/ 0
* (
/ -z.
?
1 1
P
?
7
?
10
10
11
1'
iv
) l
1 0
I OH
Total
/*"
'ff
33
3t
3<4
3 3- 1 3ST
30|
1 O 13 0,1
/0?sp
1
~
~
~
1/
~
w/
«/
l/
0
2
~
*/¦
~
~
~
~
V
1/
0
3
s
?-
~
y
H
5"
"X
5~
1/
4
If
r
"3
ic
ft
fi
5
\/
1-
Ip
1
i
v/
v/
~
V-'
0-2>
6
y/
V
10
1 1
1 ~L-
y
(o<4
7
/ 0
1 *•
1 t
1
10
10
1 1
•2,
1 0
?
JUct
Total
Ma
%o
1 c
.9^
( X
3 S~
ilt
3-bl,
)0
3-fc.fe
IIDSfi
1
1/
v/
/
v/
y
v/
~
0
2
y/
V
~
~
¦ V
~
w
V
~
w
0
3
5"
3
M
S-
5"
S"
5"
r
3 7
4
?
7-
'3-
y
7-
X
<4 L,
3
V
~
5"
V
|
"2-
7-
•?¦
7-4
<
f?
?¦
•K
-------
ALGAL TOXICITY TEST
EPA, ESD, TES
AUG. 1990
INDUSTRY/STUDY: C~> E
INITIAL INNOCULUM:
(o, cruo /Lj?
LOCATION: £ - Pul tU; c k fV C ORGANISM: SA-i "1" U-w r | COT"
DATE COLLECTED: H/? - H / 3 ><7^ ANALYST: o~ . <\\n tA ks Let
DATE TEST STARTED: )l f °! / *7 V
Coj^op^/L-jr'* j
0iO2-O
O.OUC>
0.700
3 3D
2 .«S" 2_
i>E-| O' — i CO
O.OoT-
C>.0Z 3
O'C u'L
3 •
/< /?
7 0|
G C -1 C2~L - 5 v.OoH
0,02. r
¦oo'J
3 . ? 2-
3. 70
G/= -/or -i ^
O ,tt>
0.JL7-/
1 ,lo
t.V- 3
/ .2-6
/ ,9«r
G» (S- iCj - jtsj
O.OSH
0, D?3
0Ml\
z,7r
3- V7
3v
6>E-I (0~-5^
o lOofi
O.OT-S
.ov 7.
Z-
-------
STUDY: & € if
LOCATION: / -O
STARTING DATE/TIME |1/ 7 f f V
ENDING DATE/TIME 11/ O V
ANALYST
RELATIVE ALGAL GROWTH = T - B - IN
WHERE:
B = MEAN CELL DENSITY FOR 96 HOUR BLANK FLASK.
T = MEAN CELL DENSITY FOR TEST FLASK AFTER 96 H.
IN = MEAN INITIAL CELL DENSITY AT START OF TEST
INITIAL CELL DENSITY (IN) = (INITIAL READING REP #1) - (INITIAL BLANK)
SAMPLE
INITIAL
INITIAL
96 HR
96 HR
96 HR
96 HR
INITIAL
MEAN
READING
REP #1
REP #2
REP #3
CELL
CELL
ID #
BLANK
REP #1
BLANK
READING
READING
READING
DENSITY
DENSITY
(C orT)
CONTROL
0.000
0.020
0.000
0.700
3.300
3 520
0 020
2.487
GE101sw
0.002
0.023
0.002
3.460
1.170
3 010
0.021
2 524
GE102sw
0.003
0.024
0.003
2.500
1.300
3 530
0.021
2.419
GE103sw
0.005
0.026
0.009
4.110
1.710
0.984
0.021
2.238
GE104sw
0.025
0.046
0.012
3.860
1.100
4.230
0.021
3.030
GE105sw
0.004
0.024
0.010
3.680
2.250
4.140
0.020
3.327
GE106sw
0.004
0.025
0.007
4.560
3.820
3.890
0 021
4.062
GE107sw
0.812
0.916
0.513
1.260
0.750
0 670
0.104
0.276
GE108sw
0.667
0.671
1.200
1.430
1.260
1.980
0.004
0.353
GE109sw
0.054
0.073
0.471
2.750
3.430
3.340
0.019
2.683
GEIIOsw
0.008
0.028
0.007
2.560
3.420
3.110
0.020
3.003
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #1
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #2
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #3
/' 0.680]
) 3 280
3.500
^T437
CT.T47}
2.987
2.476
fTZTT
> 3.506
4.080
3.827
(T-067^
» 4.197
3.650
2.220_
4.110
4.532
3.792
3.862
0.643
(^TT135
<-0.226.
> CD.OSg,
> 0.776
2.260
2.940
2.850
2.533
3.393
3.083
\jJLX
\\j^
J 6 6
CELL DENSITY ESTIMATED BY:
(CIRCLE ONE)
a.) DIRECT COUNT IN cells/ml
b.) FLUOROMETRICALLY
cJf M >
> OO r
'*-c&
-------
ALGAL TOXICITY TEST EPA, ESD, TES
AUG. 1990
INDUSTRY/STUDY: GE C &-(-* J f ) INITIAL INMOCULUM:
O .MTD
0. 02.-L.
0. CJOO
1.15
5-'3o
*"-T7
-2.0%
CtJ^y "2- t
2.z U
10
if.7t
iff****- *f 4
«**> t*£<
w« ft« 1^-Jr*/ $ ** C *¦1 ¦»-!
G?t -lo,f
. 9 1/
4.2.0
j. rt
(0. / /
f . 5T4
uX^Otf »Uit
6t -^ap-
(-1 (+«rte/
' 3z 2.
.3*1
3. VI
3.3 r
br #3
Hr ¦ 5-.?
5 Lt*'* A*-e M-O
**+*1 * **¦—*> ^*"k •» pv».
Ifk/- kv^j
^ tj [cfn C*+iro(
^ ^ (t.
-------
1>
r- piuTlUZ-CD Hf S
STUDY: €>*- 1
LOCATION: E*-»f , A'-C-
STARTING DATE/TIME " /7 W ? V
ENDING DATE/TIME »»/ W>y
ANALYST 3". Jl J try
RELATIVE ALGAL GROWTH = T - B - IN
WHERE:
B = MEAN CELL DENSITY FOR 96 HOUR BLANK FUVSK.
T = MEAN CELL DENSITY FOR TEST FLASK AFTER 96 H.
IN = MEAN INITIAL CELL DENSITY AT START OF TEST
INITIAL CELL DENSITY (IN) = (INITIAL READING REP #1) - (INITIAL BLANK)
SAMPLE
ID#
INITIAL
BLANK
INITIAL
READING
REP #1
96 HR
BLANK
96 HR
REP #1
READING
96 HR
REP #2
READING
96 HR
REP #3
READING
INITIAL
CELL
DENSITY
MEAN
CELL
DENSITY
(C or T)
CONTRO
0.000
0.022
0.000
1.330
5.300
4.970
0.022
3.845
Cntrl filt'd
0.000
0.021
0.000
4.690
1.160
4.330
0.021
3.372
107
1.140
1.160
4.640
5.580
6.590
5.870
0.020
1.353
107 filt'd
0.297
0.330
2.260
3.980
4.400
4.760
0.033
2.087
108
0.840
0.911
4.200
3.560
6.110
4.560
0.071
0.472
108 filt'd
0.322
0.341
3.810
3.380
6.830
4.580
0.019
1.101
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #1
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #2
RELATIVE
GROWTH
REP #3
H.308^
5.278
4.948
4^69
0-139,
4.309
<0.920,
) 1.930
1.210
1.687
2.107
2.467
(•0,zu)
1.839
(0.28^
(07449,)
3.001
ro.7£*>
\
CELL DENSITY ESTIMATED BY: a.) DIRECT COUNT IN cells/ml
(CIRCLE ONE) b.) FLUOROMETRICALLY
-------
U Jf
vSi:i;n (."i [ ion i>.\ r \
Section Will
Rttisiun Nu. 3
l)ntc: Nini-inber 19, 1993
Tnyc: 13 ufIS
Industry/Study:
Location: ML.
Species: tfrt VCt Sm/
WtihtU
Start U>;ilr-Tiitie): //-/O-gV
Ship (Ic-'riniL*):
Sample ID ft or
Concentration
Rci>-
H
ti Studs
I'hinlc J
a Si/cik
(1 ti iiiiinliil
l'l I)|)i>i (inn
(.il'l IllilClll'll
IUiiiai Its
€0r\\yo\
1
tS
II
•n
¦)
2
!<
h
H
ri-_ _
fT
, n__
^3
¦Id \j
f .ftc -• c. t
3
>5
J
4
16'
ft 10\So
1
If
¦33 1
2
if
M
• n
1 £
3
if
f
>33
4
\f
%
' )3
& \0flLfco
1
ftT
IH
• 5 4>
4
If
,73
10* Sd
1
If
___!±
r4
• ?3
¦ Hi
)
2
if
I
3
If
ij-
i f
.yi
hoo
4
>S"
*
£2 W*D
1
If
• (>3
J
6t\o$*o
1
)f
)o
i
)
2
if
n
•G>0
/
3
If
53
• w
4
If
\7-
Figure XV1II.1
^ H&ls&s Oa-v-M -Q-* t£^4'-^cJL - wt'f
-------
SliKD C; I,K|M I|NA I K.)N DA I \
Set bun Will
RciLmum Nu. 3
Dole: Nim-mbcr 19, 1993
Tncc: 13 of IS
Industry/Study: /\11;11 >si: » ltu»\f f/W
Localiun: U-c^«/xiuv\lU N4* Simi u>.ii'¦¦Tinii'): //•/»¦ i*f
Species: Slop (I ):iii'-*l iiiii'):
Siunple ID H ur
Concentiiiliun
Rcji.
H
A Smls
I'hntnl
r SlTlls
(in miiuUil
I'l |I|HH (mil
tin niliiiitt il
Kumurks
1
/s"
It.
,'6o
2
IS
IM
c
3
/6
I 3
:i \o
4
lb"
13
,S(*
1
1.6'
lu
)
2
I tf
lb'
1 . CO
•7J
3
l-T
' 1
.73
4
1 b
?
V?>
1
/ 5"
13
, H
Gk »*t
2
IT
'1- -
. f1 *
(
3
IT
13
.V*
io
4
1 b
1 f
A3
]
If
1 3_
Vb
£\
2
i T
12-
/yo
/ .<3
3
If
13
I 0 C
4
if
'5
.%
1
1
15"
C1
i (oO
¦)
\\0 $D
2
if
*
/ .+=1
3
If
L
, HO
f
4
\T
.Ml
)
1
2
3
4
Figure XVlll.l
-------
v.
Microtox Data Sheet
Study: Date: // -!c ~°f V
Location: NC- Analyst: J ¦ hy
*
Sample
Reading
Time
Cuvette Number
1
2
3
4
5
pV©vs*/
Initial
*12
loH
^3
°i1
5 minute
nn
(>c1
-------
x .? X
Microlox Data Sheet
Studv: Date:
Location: /V <- Analyst: ^ • A^on/ef tity
Sample
Reading
Time
Cuvette Number
1
2
3
4
5
*>S
Initial
9 W
97
11
VT
5 minute
1 1
'7 t,
7-u
7o
15 minute
'o 1
7^
7 o
67
6?
146 J' u/
Initial
8C>
as
(si)
/J"
(s/J
5 minute
It
1 t
7o
15 minute
(o (0
(oS
\
C^fo J
lofe
(<+T)
xcl ^
Initial
\7
83
J7,
c? 0
5 minute
Ul
7 ">
ie>S
70
15 minute
cv
67
£,?
(.rTi \015*
Initial
^7
y v
5 minute
7t
7°
7o
71
7o
15 minute
?•>
71-
Initial
3^ 1
£ v 1
*/
S?
5 minute
7^
7^>
71
(**}
71>
15 minute
(*1
(f J
7^
7H
no *w
Initial
S"7
83
5 minute
"7-u
7J*
7^
7-r
7b
15 minute
7^
7 ^
7r
7b
Initial
5 minute
15 minute
-------
Microtox Data Sheet
Study: ^ (— .S>£ Av 11 / ?~c1 / 1 H
Location: £ o-n^ {Lc <^L( AI • Analyst: -5" ¦ ci^a \ s (v
Sample
Reading
Time
Cuvette Number
1
2
3
4
5
,7)l\*v^V-P
r ,*i
Initial
^ >
<5 V
^ 3
' 52.
5 minute
J t
V7
2<7
2 1
15 minute
70
sv
2
sr
<1??
5 minute
7/
7^
73
7
L*.
7Z.
to 7
6<= i ol IP
p*n^e iW>-^-*-
Initial
if
£ '>
1 L.
°to
5 minute
(c> /
6 /
7 v
"77
1 r
15 minute
5"v
Co "3
tr
no
Ge M s D
pel* uj
Initial
<7 V
£/
3-fc
S& /or Sf>
u/^
Initial
y ^
9b
?2-
9 T
5 minute
ir
7^
i>2"
*3
*3
15 minute
bf
7/
ly
74,
-------
Microtox Data Sheet
Study: &t-\jcP |0
sr
5 minute
<*>3
i &
7*
7c
15 minute
t,0
b (o
L) la
Co
£ o
5 minute
S3'
iy
5r
15 minute
? ^
if
71
or-j
*-
p
Jt"A
Initial
s>>
7 i-
^9
ei\
77
5 minute
-?i
&¥
S 7
?r
z/"
15 minute
7V
C* b
yr
Jfe
Pi »-
UVi w*-
YL». io&f of
{.tvtu Z «"£-
-------
APPENDIX C
Rapid Bioassessment Field Data Sheets
Summary of Fish Collections
-------
MILD DUTJL. SMCtT
nd«»l«»»t lnr«u«Jln Uld 0**i
ffCllt _
lald/faatara Afrlcaltml - laaldaatlal
¦ ••Ty
:1a I
other
Lacal Watafahad Iraiita/ Bona 9 Modarata
Local Kitirihtd MM Vsllutloai avidaac
titUitid ItDii Width | a . t~a 11 aa t ad Straaa Bapthi
llfb Watar Mark O.^1 ¦ Telocity Oaa Praaaati Ta*
Caaapy Cavart Opaa fartly Opaa ricttf shaded /
ItPtHf T/HI1IT1 ATf I
fedlaeat Odora: fi»raal
fedlaeat 011 a t
f«dlaaot Dtpolltl : Sludje
Poal
Cbanaallsadt Taa
JLD a • r o b 1 c
I.I let lb*1 I 1
o-~- ^ ~v
GP
Jrti
0(4
l*dr«ck
>•« 1 J« r
C•bb1•
0 r * » • 1
S •»«!
Itlt
C1»T
> 23(-*s (19 la. )
< (2.3-10 1* . »
2-H-mm | • . 1 - J . 3 la.}
I . 0 i- 2.90(gritty) —
.00<-.««-aa
( . 60 «-«jb liUck)
r«(c«oi
c* •Iti••
1 ffpi|a^ lf<
7 *r
2,o
Orotic tubi t i • ( 1 Coaoon*nt i
lMb« t r•t• Typ<
RuC k-Hm d
Ma r 1
I c
/• ( c (
C*apo*lClo«
• 3••o 1 i•o ir <
Sticks. tr«od,
Coin* f 1 1 o 1
Nt t•r 1 • I 1 (C TO* |
al
-------
habitat assessment field 1>ATa siibbt
Nubs of Water Bnriv Rc-V f-CrC- C/V.4-C C<— Station » j Q
| l/ J I Inveetigator <1
P&te
Concents.
f'U>-y-x / fa(Xt\ls Cc^
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATEUOR1RS
EXCELLENT
OOOD
f AIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>50* rubble,gravel,
subaerged logs,
undercut banka,or
other atabla habitat
16-20
30-50* rubble.gravel
or other atable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
U- 15
10-30* rubble,grave 1
or other atable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
deelrable.
1 0 ®-10
<10* rubble,grave 1
or otheT stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat ia obvious.
0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS
Oravel.cobble, and
boulder ere <25*
eurrounded by fine
sedlaent.
[g 16-20
Oravel.cobble, a nil
bouldor are 25-50X
surrounded by fins
eediaent.
11-15
0rnve1,cobble, and
boulder are 50-75*
eurrounded by fine
aediaent.
6-10
Oravel,cobble, and
boulder are >75*
eurrounded by fine
sedlaent.
0-5
3. 2 cfs
1-2
cfs
0.5-1 cfs
0.5 cfs
Harai >5 cfs
2-5
cfs
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/a).deep
3 of 4 1
habltata
2 of 4 habltate
Doainated by one
(> 0 . 5a) -, alow , ehellow
preaent.
(Kleelng
present. (Missing
velocity/depth
(<0.5a);faet(>0.3a/a)
r 1 f f lea
or rune
rifflee/runs get
category (usually
daepi fast,shallow
get lover
score than
lover acora. )
pool).
habltata all preaent
aiaalng
pools) .
IP 8"10
18-20
11-15
0-5
4. CHAHHBL
ALTERATION
Little / no enlarge-
aent of ialande or
point bare. and/or
no channelliation
is-
12-15
Soaa new increaee In
bar format Ion, »oe 11 r
froa coarae gravel;
and/or aoaa cbannel-
liatlon preaent.
6- 11
Moderate deposition
of new grsva1.coaraa
aand on old and nas
bar»;poola partially
(Iliad »,'ailtiand/or
eobankaents on both
banks.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine aaterlal, bar
davelopaent Increase
Moat poola filled "/
ailt;and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOURIHQ
AMD
DEPOS1TI0H
<5* of bottoa
affected.
IZ
12-15
t-JO* affectad.6cour
at oonatrlctlona and
ateep grades. Soa«
deroeltlon In poola.
1-11
30-50* affaoted. >50* bottoa cbanflnf
Depot It and acour at nearly rear Ions,
obetruetlone, bends. Poole absent due to
and cooitrlotlons. dapoaltlon. Only
Bona filling of poola large rocks sxposed.
4-T 0-3
6. FUN/BEHD, 6-7. Variety of
POOL/R111LE habitat.Daap rllflaa
BAT10»« and poola.
12*16
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occassional
In poola and rlfflee riffle or band.Bottoa
Bends provide habitat provide eoae habitat
6-11
,2i
4-7
>25. laeentlally a
straight atreaa. flat
aater or shallow
Poor habitat.
0-3
7. BAH*
STABIL1TT
Stable. Mo eroalon
or bank failure.Side
slopes <30*.
.10
8-10
Moderately atabla
Infrequent eroalon
•oatly healed over.
Side alop-ea to 40*.
6-9
Hoderetely unstable.
Moderate erosion and
aide alopea to 60*.
Hifh eroalon during
high flow.
3-5
Unstable. Many eroded
araaa. 81de alopea
>60*. "Fa»" areaa
frequent on straight
and bands.
0-2
6. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of streaabank
covered by vegetation
or boulders end
cobblee.
9-10
50-79* covered by 25-49* covered by <25* covered by
vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterlal. larger Material. larger aaterlal.
-0>-
6-0
3-5
0-2
6. ETRBAMSIDI Doalnant vegetation
COVER la shrub
Doalnant vegetetlon
le of tree fora.
Doalnant vegetation
it graaa or forbee.
6-10
1
6-6
3-5
>60* no vegetation
Doalnant aaterlal la
soil,rock, bridge
•aterials.culverts,or
sine tailings.
0-2
COLUHH TOTALS
SCOBS ^
-------
Rapid Bloasscssmcnt Protocol
Blosurvcy Field Dotn Shoot
/»!
n/sK1*
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
0 2 3
) 1 2 3
) 1 2 3
Perlphyton
Filamentous Algae
Macrophytes
Slimes (jJ^
Macrolnverlebralet 0
Fliti 0
A
4
©
0« Absent/Not Obierved
1 - Rare
2 ¦ Common
3 - Abundant
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST (indie it* FUiiUvt Abundmc* n . n«n, C - Common, A ¦ Abundtrrt, D « Dominant)
Porllera
Anlaoptera ]
Chironomldae Q_
Hydrozoa
Zygoptefa ^
Plscoptam f}
Platyhelmlnthes
Hemlptara
Ephamaropteri f-f-
Ibrbellarla
Colaopteia
Trlchoptera
Hlrudlnea
Lepldopteia
Otlier
Ollgochaeta
Slalldae
laopoda C _
Corydslldno
Amphlpodo
Tlpulldao
Decapoda
Empldldsc
Gastropoda
Slmullldor d
Blvalvla
Tabanldar
Cullcldnc
Rare <3 Common 3-
9 Abundant • 1U
Dominant >50 (Estimate
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shoet for ute with Rapid Biosj jenment Protocol I.
-------
fllLO DATA f&KKT
tl V") j-t*- iT^ / ^
mixcu amanzarzoc
iifMiu ton/nintm rttnmti
frt4taia«at IvirowaJial Uad 0««t
ri«14/rait«i« Africultiral
cmI v«t«rakffd Irtalii: loot Kodarit*
Local Vit«rah«d IfS Vollutloai lo •rldaftca
CatlaaCad ltr*aa Vldtb f m .Catlaatad Strata Daptht Klffla Q.I
llgh tfitar Hack Qt m Velocity
Caaapf Covin Opta Partly Op«a Partly Sbadad
¦ IPtHIIT/SmiTUTI I
Mdlatat Odora: loml
fadlaaot 011a: b % <
ladlaaot Dapoalta: Sludf*
la 1
Ioduatrial
01 b • r
/9 o Ua-J
jlo a • r o b I c
TTP«
l«drtck
!•«IJ«r
C#bb I «
Until
litJ
lilt
Clay
> 2)<-*a I 1 0 1 a . )
44-2 (2.3-10 1* . 1
i•.i-2.i in. »
t .04-2(irI tlx »
. 0 0 4 -.t 4 -«a
(.104 -u (•lick)
t•c cao t
Ca*pa«1t
1i 1 tap I 105 kr•a
40
30
z a
/ 0
Or
go
WJLTC1 QUALITY
Taapafatara
Oliaalvad Oijrfaa
P«
Caaduct1v1ty
Yaatraaaat(i) tf #ad
Itraia Typa: (Coldvat
Vatac Odorat Varaal
tfatar Jurfaca OlJ a * Xtlck
Turbidity
Slightly Turbid
Cbaalca I
Cloba Placka
Turbid Opaqua
VXATIE1 COMDITIOIJ
£> y°^
PHOTOOkAFM IUKIII
-------
HABITAT ASSESSHKIIT FIELD DATA SHSRT
^ st.tlen .102.
fane of Water Roriv ' r»"P- ^ Station «.
Pate I / / / ? Y Inv«Btif®tor ^
Coetenta.
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATEQORIRS
EXCELLENT
GOOD
TA1R
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>60* rubble.gravel,
subaerged logs,
undercut bank*,or
other atable habitat
2.0 16-20
30-50* rubble.gravel
or other atable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30* rubble,gr*»el
or other stable
hsbltet. Habitat
availability <
deelrabla.
6-10
<10* rubble,gravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat la obvious.
0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS
Oravel.cobbl*, and
boulder ere <25*
surrounded br fine
eedlaent.
"2.Q 16"20
Orave1,cobble. and
boulder are 25-50*
surrounded br fine
eedlaent.
11-15
Oreve1.cobblei and
boulder are 60-75*
surrounded by fine
eedlaent.
6-10
Oravel.cobble, and
boulder are >75*
eurrounded br fine
eedlaent.
0-5
3. <= 5 crs
Cold: > 2 cfs
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfa
0.5 cfs
Marat >6 cfa
2-6 cfa
1-2 cfs
1 c£e
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 CPS
Blow (<0.3 a/*).deep
3 of 4 habitat*
2 of 4 habltata
Doalnsted by one
(>0.5a);elov,ehallow
preient. (Mia*Ins
present. (Missing
velocity/depth
(<0 .5a);fest(>0.3a/e)
riffles or run*
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deepi fast,(halloa
get lover acore than
louer score.)
pool).
habltate all preeent
alee lng poola).
6-10
16-20
11-15
0-5
4. CHAWHEL
ALTERATION
Little / no enlerge-
aent of Island* or
point bar*, and/or
no channel lotion
13
12-15
Sob* neu increase In
bar foraetIon.aoetlr
fro* coaree gravel;
and/or aoaa cbannel-
iiatlon preaent.
8-11
Moderate deposition
of n«i gravel,coarae
sand on old and nan
bsr*;pool* partially
flllad «/allt[and/or
eabankaents on both
banks.
4-7
Heavy depoelts of
fine aaterlel, bar
developaent Increase
Hoat pool* filled »/
alIt,-and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOOR1HO
AHD
DEPOSITION
<6* of bottoi
affected.
/r
12-15
5-30* affacted.Boour
at oonatrlctlona and
eteep (radea. Soae
depoaltlon In poola.
e-ii
30-50% affeoted. >50* bottoa changing
Deposit tod scour at nearly Tear Ions,
ob*truotlont, bend*, Poola abaeot due to
and coostrlotlons. depoaltlon. Only
Boa* filling of poola larce rocks eipoeed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIffLE
RATIO**
6-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffle*
and pool*.
12-16
7-15. Adequate depth
In poole and riffles
Bend* provide habitat provide aoaa habitat
15-25. Occassional >25. essentially a
riffle or band.Bottoa straight strsaa. Flat
/>
e-ii
4-7
aster or shallow
Poor habitat.
0-3
7. BAHK
STABILITY
Stable. Mo erosion
or back failure.Bide
slopes <30*.
Modsrelaly stable
Infrequent sroalon
aoetly healed over.
Side slopes to 40k.
9-10
.8.
6-6
Moderately unstable.
Hoderste eroaloo and
side alopes to 60k.
High erosion during
high flo*.
3-6
Unstable. Hanr eroded
areas. Side slope*
>60*. "Raw* areis
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
6. BAHR
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of streaabank
covered by vegetetlon
or boulder* and
cobblea.
a b- io
50-79* covered br 25-49* covered by
vegetttlon, gr*v*l or vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterlal. larger aaterlal.
6-8
3-5
<251 covered br
vegetatloo. grevel or
larger aaterlal.
0-2
B. ETREAMSIDI
Doalnant vegetetlon
Doeinsnt vegetation
Poelnant
vegetation
>50* no vegetation
COVER
la shrub
1* of tree fora.
Is (rase
or forbea.
Doalnant aaterlel le
eoil.rock, bridge
asterIsIs.culverts.or
Bine tallinga.
B-10
8
3-5
0-2
COLUMN TOTALS
6C0RE I 1 4
JlL
OT
I o
-------
Rapid Blonouossincnt Protocol
Dlosuivey Field Dnlo Slicol
G / 0 2~
Blvslvla
Tnbnnldne
Cullcldnc
Rare <3 Common 3-
9
t huncjanl • U1
Sllmoa
MacroliiveMcbrnlis 0 1
n«h o 1,
J - Abundant
2 3 4
2 3 <2>.
® 4
4 - Dominant
Clilronomldit
50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shout (or uio with Rapid Uioanenment Protocol I.
-------
(r, L "> 'H- I u J
11 /XI m
¦o •vldtBC*
Obv
*-T
ritiicix, auuaniunoa
nmiu toK/iMTtiAw rtxmti
firttiiadlif Ltid Baal
faraat . ^rll ttatarabad liiiiti: loa* r\ Modarata
Local Vatarabad BfJ Nllutloai
Ittiaatad Itraaa Width _^e.» .Eatiaatad strata Daptbi llffla \ m lua (J .7- m roal O/^) >
¦ l«b Vatar Hark ~P ' a Valoclty _____ Oaa tralaatl Taa la _v/ Cbaaaallaadi Taa Bo
Caaapf Cavari Opaa P
ttPtntar/iuaiTHTti
ladlaant Od«tH' ltfa|J—Savafa othar
ladiaaot Olla^" JLbtaa(/
l.llct thalla 0 t h•r
V 7
.baaayy Sllfbt KadaraCa PraCuaa
t«dlB«ot D • p o • 11 j : Jludf* la vduit Np«r fib*r
Art tb« uid*rild«i of itA^ii which ara iot d»«ply »dd*d black ?
^TP«
••dr*ck
>•«1J« r
C*bb t •
3 ( * « « I
• • a J
lilt
CUr
> n<-** no ia. i
<4-J3i-«ua (].3*19 la. |
| fl . 1- 3 . 3 la . J
I.O*-2.f6-a« (1r1t t7)
. 0 0 4 ~.V 4-aa
( . l«(-u ( a 11 cfc )
P«(C«Ol
Ca•J 11•«
j ¦ f xpl |a^ kt • a
lo
3 O
lO
OmmIc lubi t f (• Co«p«
l«b> t r > t• Typ*
0*t rltMi
: 1 c
| War I
Iticki , w«od,
Curi* F 1 • a t
mt • r 111i | cron)
• I « c I . flo#
otfisle (rtoni
Q r • 7 . J b • 1 1
f
CoapoiItlo>
¦ 11 tp1 I>4 ir»«
KATI» QUALITY
Taaparataca T C Dlaaalvad Oiytaa 7'^ Pg Caaductl»ltr "Z^ > °i Otbar
laatiaaaatla I Oaad ^ ^ lj^| ^vu\ct.^i 3 cc/v-A
(¦oaa
Itraaa Typa : \Cold«it»i^^ Varavatar
Vital Odotai larail Satfa^a Fatrolaua Cbaalcal (¦oaaOlhar
Hatar Surfaca Oflat lllck Sbaaa Cloba rlacka
Turbidity ~""cTTajZ^ lllfbtlr Turbid Turbid Opaqua
r
triXTItl C0BDITto«J U; O. ¦ £> S 0 f
fKOTOOiArg BUM9C1
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMENT FIELD DATA SHEBT
Naee of Water BoHv B^T C-^L- Station »_LQ_2_
Date 11 t 1 V Investigator / ffa g-^*- 60* rubble.gravel,
30-60* rubble.gravel
10-30* rubble,gravel
<10* rubble,gravel
SUBSTRATE/
subaarged loga.
or other atable
or other stable
or other atable
AVAILABLE
undercut banka.or
habitat.
habitat. Habitat
habitat. Lack of
COVER
other atable habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat la obvious.
dealrabla.
~2p 16-2°
11-15
6-10
0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
Gravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
Gravel.cobble, and
Gravel.cobble, and
NESS
boulder are <25*
boulder are 25-50*
boulder are 50-75*
boulder are >75*
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
aedlaent.
sedlaent.
•ediaent.
sedlBent.
2.0 18-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
3. <= 5 cfs
Cold; > 2 cfa
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfa
0.5 cfs
Mara; >5 cfs
2-5 cfs
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
no
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
wn
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 B/e),deep
3 of 4 hsbitate
2 of 4 habitats
Dominated by one
(>0.5a);alow,ahallow
preeent. (Hlaalng
preaent. (Hiaslng
velocity/depth
(<0.5a);faet(>0.3s/a)
riffles or rune
riff lea/runt get
category (usually
deep; fast,shallow
get lover score than
lower score.)
pool).
habltata all present
aiaalng poola).
16-20
11-16
6-10
0-5
4. CHANNEL
ALTERAT10H
Little / no enlarge-
¦•nt of lalanda or
point bar*, and/or
no channelisation
IH-
12-15
Sob* new increase In
bar foraatlon.Boetly
froa coaree gravel;
and/or eoae cbannel-
laatlon present.
8-11
Moderate deposition
of new gravel,coarse
¦and on old and nan
bara;poola partially
filled B/allt;and/or
eabsnkaents on both
banka.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine Material, bar
development Increase
Most pools filled w/
allt;and/or extenelve
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOURIHO
AND
DEPOSITION
<5% of bottoa
affected.
.1.1.
12-15
5-30* affected.Scour
at oonstrlctlons and
steep (rede*. Soae
dapoaltlon In poola.
8-11
30-50* affeoted.
Depoalt and scour at
obstruotlona, bends,
snd constrictions.
6o»e filling of pool*
4-7
>50* bottoa changing
nearlr rear lone.
Pools abaent due to
deposition. Only
larie rocks exposed.
0-3
6. RUN/BIND,
POOL/RlFfLE
RATIO**
6-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
•fid pools.
I.C.
12-15
7-15. Adequate depth
In poola and rlfflaa
Bends provide habitat
e-ii
15-25. Occassional >25. Essentially s
riffle or bend.Bottoa straight stress. Flat
provide eoae habitat water or shallow
Poor habitat.
4-7 0-3
7. BANK
STABILITY
Stable. Ho aroslon
or back failure.Bide
slopes <30*.
B-10
Moderately atsble
Infrequent erosion
aoetly healed over.
Bide slopes to 401.
6-6
Hodsratsly unstsble.
Moderate erosion and
•Ida slopes to 60*.
High erosion during
bllb flow.
C~ 3-6
Unstable. Many eroded
areas. Side alopea
>60*. -Raw* areas
frequent on atralcht
and bends.
0-2
6. BANE
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of atreaabank 60-79* covered by
covered by vefetatlon vegetation, (ravel or
or boulders and larger aaterlal.
cobblea.
9-10 V 6-6
Doalnant vegetation Doalnant vaiatatlon
la ehrub la of traa fora.
26-49* covered by
vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterlal.
3-6
<25* covered by
vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterlal.
0-2
B. STRBAMSIDE
COVER
Doalnant vegetation
la grata or forbee.
e-io
8
6-6
3-5
"S"
>50* no vegetation
Doalnant aaterlal la
soil,rock, bridge
asterlals.culvsrts,or
Bins tailings.
0-2
COLUMN TOTALS
SCORE
-------
Rapid Dlonoucusment
(lloainvi.-y I'lulii Dntn
Prolocol I
Slieo I
Gt \D3
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC OIOTA
Perlpliylon 0 I
Filamentous Algoo (oy 1
Maerophyles fo) 1
©
Sllmo &
Mscioln /oi lct;r pi* 5
riflh
CP
2 3 4
dy <
© 3 4
0 « Absent/Hot Ob»ervod
1 » noio
2 - Common
J - Abundant
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTMOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(indic«ti Miitu* • Abundine# ft - n«n. c - Comn«n, A » Abundint, D« Dominant)
Porllera
Anlsopteia
Chlionomlda*
f\
Hydrozoa
Zygoplem
I'locopHra
Platyhelmlnlhaa
Hamlplern
1 pliemtroplara
TUrbellarla
Coleopleis
50 (Eillmate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Dam Slioet (or uto wiili Hopul Uioamnment Protocol I.
A 7
-------
rilLD DATA (NEST
rmicu. auurniuriM
lfl>*»IAJi IOIt/t»WKM HXTWII
fradaalaaat l«tt»mdl«| Laad Baal
Mald/Paatarq A?rlealtaral >•
• a: loaa ItiTf
Local Vltanbid If] Fsllutloat avldaaca It
(atlaatad Ittia* Width 1 a .Eatlaatad ltr>» Dapthi ll(Mi Q./
¦ Igk Vitir Hark | ¦ fdeclty Daa Fraaaati Taa
rartly Opaa Partly Shadad
5«vif« Ftlralatja Cbaalcal
S11qbc NodaraC* Prafuaa
iivduit r«p«r r ib« r
vblch iti set d««p!r )dd*d black?
Ioduttr1*1
Otb* r
^Ob*lout 3outcm)
S«dla«al Odora( ¦•raal
l*dl««ot OlUt CA
f«di»«at D«poalta: Sludj*
j£*\ r- v cK. 4
Bun Q _ m tool 0 . S ¦
Cb•na«11I•dl So
J 1 c
<£^|Er ^
C *3
»• I 1ct l h• 1 I«
T • •
looryalc lib»U»t< Coipfnt »
*7P«
l«df*ck
• ««1J« r
C.bb I •
Ori*• 1
f * • J
Silt
CUT
» n<-am (10 1» . |
n-jji-w (2.3-io i*. i
(0.1-1.5 In.)
t.04-1.00-»« (gritty)
.oei-.M-ti
(.104 -M ( • 1 1 C k |
f«(C«al
C«••1tI••
11 l»»p| lo^ tn
3D
"SO
HO
t • ( C • » I
rp?
0«(rItui
Kucl-Mud
f 1
Qificfrln lc
flick*. v*od.
C• • r•• fItat
n* t • r ! * I t ic ton i
11 «ci , T»ry r i 3f
Offlolc |fFO«l
Of if, ) h • 1 1
I» l««pll»< Ji r <
> So
Zo
*kTtB QUALITY
taapantin ? -3p C Olaaolvad Oajrfaa 8 ' H 7 P* b. 2^f Caaductlvltf 2*^ i I Otbar
laa t maaat I • I Oaad
Typa: 'Ajd«at«r) Warsvatar
Mitx Odorai loraa I la«iqa Patrolaua Cbaalcal /»ooa / Othar
Httar Surfaca Ofla: Slick Sbaaa CUba flacba
Turbldltyi Claar Cillfbtlr Turbid J Turbid Opaqua
CUD
WKATHta COBOITIOB3
S (A. ^ ^ ^ ccror^.
PHOTOOiAFM BUIfSKl
-------
HABITAT ASSESShEHT FIELD DATA SIIEBT
Hobo of Water nodv ft AT f~ P V- U. U_
Pnte I i / X / *7 V Investigator
Contftntl
StAtlO
-¦/of
Vl-V ^ C.OM cLt»
CATEQORISS
nnoi m
PARAMETER
EXCELLEHT
OOOD
rAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
>60* rubble.grave 1,
30-60* rubble.gravel
10-30X rubble,grevel
<10*
rubble
.gravel
SUBSTRATE/
aubaargad log*,
or other atabla
or other atable
or
other
atable
AVAILABLE
undercut bank*,or
habitat.
habitat. Habitat
habitat.
Lack of
COVER
other atabla habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat la
obvioue.
}75*
aurrounded br
f lne
aurrounded br fine
aurrounded br fine
aurrounded br fine
eediaent.
eediaent.
aadlaent.
eediaent.
2- O
18-20
11-15
0
w*
1
CD
0-5
3. <= 5 crs
Cold: > 2 cf*
1-2 cfa
0.6-1 cfe
0.5 cfa
Mara; >6 cfa
2-6 cfe
1-2 cfa
1 cfa
10-20
11-16
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 crs
61ow (<0.3 a/a).deep
3 of 4 habitat*
2 of 4 habitata
Doalnated br one
(>0.5a);elow,ahtllow
praaent. (Mlaalng
praaent. (Hlaelng
velocltr/depth
(«0.5a);fest(>0.3a/s)
riffle* or run*
rlfflea/runa get
categorr (ueuallr
daepi feat,ahalloa
gat lower acora than
loaar acora.)
pool).
habitata all preeant
aiaalng poola).
18-20
\S n'16
8-10
0-5
4. CHAHHEL
ALTERATION
Little / no enlarge-
¦•nt of leland* or
point bare, and/or
no channellaatlon
\±
12-15
Bo-a* ne» Inert*** in
bir foraation,Boatlr
froa coirit gravel;
and/or eoae cb*nn*l-
laation pr«i»nt.
9-11
Moderate deposition
of ne« gravel.coarse
aand on old and nea
baraipoola partiallr
(Iliad */ailt;and/or
eabankaenta on both
banka.
4-7
Heavr depoaita of
fine aaterlal, bar
davelopaent ineraaaa
Hoat poola filled w/
ailt;and/or «*ten*lT<
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOOR1HO
AND
DEP0S1T10H
<6* of bottca
af factad.
12-15
5-30* effected.Ocour
»t oon*trlet Ion* and
¦te*p grade*. Soae
deposition In rool*
8-11
30-50* affected. >50* bottoa changing
Depoalt and ecour at naarlr Taar long,
ob*truotlon», banda, Poola abaaot due to
and cooatriotlona. dapoaition. Only
Bob* filling of poola larie rock* expoeed.
4-7 0-3
6. RliN/BgHD,
pooL/Rimi
RATIO**
8-7. Tariatr of
hibltat.Deep rifflaa
and poola.
12-16
7-16. Adequate depth
in poola and rifflaa
B«nde provide habitat
a
8-11
16-25. Occaaalonal >26. laeentlallr a
rlffl* or band.Bottoa straight atraaa. Fla
prorida aoaa habitat water or ahalloa
Poor habitat.
4-7 0-3
7. BAHK
Stable.
, Ho aroalon
Moderately
atable
Moderately unatable.
Unstable. Many erode
STABILITY
or bank
failure.Bide
Infrequent
ero*Ion
Moderate eroeioo aod
araaa. Side alopea
a lope a <30*.
aoetlr heal<
id over.
• Ida
• lopes to 60*.
>60*. "Raw* areas
Side alopaa
to 40*.
High
eroaioo during
frequent on straight
high flo».
and banda.
9-10
8
o-e
3-6
0-2
0. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>•0* of atraaabank
covered br vegetation
or bouldere and
cobblaa.
C» 8-10
SO-79* covered br
vegetation, i:*i«l or
larger aaterlal.
e-e
25-49* covered br <25* covered by
vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel c
larger aaterlal. larger aatarial.
3-5
0-2
9. 6TPEAHSIDE Doalnant vegetation
COVER ia ahrub
Doalnant vegetation
ia of tree for*.
6-6
Doalnant vegetation
la graaa or forbee.
3
3-5
>60* no vegetation
Doalnant aatarial li
aoll.rock, bridge
aateriale.culverte.c
aine talllnga.
0-2
COLUHH TOTALS
2>±
SCORE
_LL£
-------
Rapid Bioasscssment Prolocol I
Blosurvey Field Data Sheol
C.E-
l»/l
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 1
Filamentous Algae ^ 1
Macrophytes 0 1
©
Sllmea 0 1
Macrolnvertebrnlas 0 1
Flali 0 1
&
' <£>
0 » Absent/Not Obaerved
1 « Rare
2 » Common
3 - Abundant
4 ¦ Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(lndic«i« Rtl«Uv« Afcundtnct R « n«n, C - Common, A« Abundant, 0 - Dominant)
Porltera
Anlaoplera
Chlronomldaa
Hydrozoa
Zygoptera
(¦)
Plocoplera
0-
Platyhelmlnthea
Memlplero
tphamaroptera
LL
Ibrtoellarla
Coleopteta
P^
Tilchoplara
V
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoptaia
OUier
Ollgochaeta
IZ
Slalldae
Isopoda
d
Corydalldao
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldno
Decapoda
EmpldlUnc
Gastropoda
(<
SIrnulllrlne
ft
Blvalvla
Tobnnldnc
Cullcldoe
l«L
Rare < 3
Common 3-
9
Abundant > 10
Dominant >50 (Eallmata)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shoet (or uie with Rapid Bioanenment Protocol I.
A-7
-------
riXLD DAT* IKIIT
L-^> Lr
J'
I er ¦ 1 O' J
7
f
niizcu cuuanzunM
iiruijui io»i/r»iTiiM rrntwui
Liid Vitt
raraat _ rUU/P«it«r^ Africnltural
Local tfatarabad Krtilia
Local Vttarabid VVS Pollutioai
Kitlaatt^ Itrtia Width 0,«\ ¦a Kltiaatid ltr««a Dapthi IlffU
¦ Iflb Vit«r Mark 0' Im falaclty Dim fra««ati Taa
Ieduatrial
Ciaapf Cevari Opaa
HfltWIIT/IUItTDlTt 1
ladlaaat Odori t(~ lorai]
l«dla«Bt Oils; / lib•
fadlaaot 0*poatta: Sludfa
Partly Skadad
Savi^a fatralcua Cbaatcal
Sllqbt Mad«ci(« rr«(ut«
livduat f*p»r r l b•t
m Buo 0 L m tool (J ^ % m
¦ a v/ Cbannalliadi !«• Mo V
JLo if rablc
ad black 7
taorgaalc C
ltdf«ck
t • « 1J • r
Cabbla
0 r • ~ • 1
J a a J
Silt
Claf
)2U-aa (10 1a. I
l o
no
OriillC )ublt rit • C o«pon»nt \
Ixbatrata Ty p «
Oatrltwa
Huek-Hwd
Ha ( 1
Ch • r a c t•r t a t I c
Click#, V«od,
C • • r a • f1iat
Hit • r 1 a I i IC fOflI
I I act , T•r j r!a •
Organic |T70«)
a r «T . Jb•1 1
fra^aiata
t • J • • O M ¦ q 1 f 4
f o
.—<70
QUJLLXTT
(o, ( e
Dlaaolvad Otf^aa
y. v
p«
4.3/
C.aduct1»1ty
W7.2-
Othar
laatfttaaat(i| Ua«d
Straaa Typa : ^Co 1 dwa t • r
Watac Odorai \>oraal^ fawagi
Vatar Surfaca Olli: Slick \lhaa«^
TurbldityifClaar lllfbtlr Turbid
ltua Cb« a 1c a 1
Claba rlacka
Turbid Opaqua
Sp tt A {>
U-
WKATICl COVDXTXOS5
PHOTOOBAPIf HUKBZI
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMRMT FIELD UATA SIIBRT _
H#ne of W»ter Body P) ^ ^ fl \Z (_!*¦'<¦'* Smtlon CP
Dsle /| / £ / ^ Y lnv«ail|Alor ' ' ^ ' * ) C / /1 I 60* rubble,(revel,
eubasrged Ion,
undercut benke.or
Other stable habitat
Zq.
18-20
30-60* rubble.gravel
or other stable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30* rubble,travel
or other atable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
desirable.
6-10
<101 rubble,(ravel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat la obvious.
0-6
2 EHBEDDED-
Oravel.cobble, and
Oravel.cobble, and
Oravel,cobble. and
Oravel.cobble, and
HSSS
boulder are <25*
boulder are 25-50*
boulder are 60-75*
boulder are >75*
aurrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
aedlaent.
sedluent.
aedlaent.
aedlaent.
jej 16-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
3. <= 5 crs
Cold! > 2 cfe
1-2 cfe
0.6-1 cfs
0.5 cfs
Kara: >6 cfs
2-5 cfe
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
11-16
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 crs
Slow (<0.3 a/e ) ,deep
3 of 4 hebltete
2 of 4 hsbltsts
Doalnsted by one
(>b.5a);sloii,ehellou
preeent. (Hliilng
present. (Hleslng
velocity/depth
(<0.5a);fast(>0.3a/e)
riffles or rune
riffles/runs get
category (ueually
deepi fast,eh*lloo
get lower score then
lower ecore.)
pool).
habitats all preeent
•issing pools).
18-20
J i> »'-»
6-10
0-5
4. CHAHHEL
ALTERATIOH
Little / no enlarge-
aent of island* or
point bara, and/or
no channe1 littIon
1H-
12-15
9oae nan lncreaie In
bar foraatlon,eoatlr
froe coarae (ravel;
and/or soae channel-
isation preeent.
8-11
Moderate deposition
ot new (ravel,coarae
aand on old and nee
bars;pools partially
filled w/ailtiend/or
eabankaente on both
benka .
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine aaterlal, bar
development Increase
Host pools filled v/
allt;and/or extant It*
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCO0R1H0
AHD
DIP0B1T10H
<6* of bcttc
affected.
/r
12-15
6-30* affected.Bcour
at oon«trlctlone and
ateep (radee. Soae
deposition In rools.
e-ii
30-50* affeoted. >50* bottoa changing
Deposit sod scour at nearlr rear long,
obstruction*, bends, Poole abaeat due to
and constrictions. deposition. Only
Boae filling of pools large rocks expooed.
4-T 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIM LB
RATIO'S
6-7. tarlety of
hibltat.Desp riffles
end pools.
/ £T 12-16
7-15. Adequate depth 16-25, Occassional >25. Essentially a
In poola and riffles riffle or bend.Bottoa stral(ht atreaa. Flo'
Bend* provide habitat provide eoae habitat water or shallow
Poor habitat.
8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BAHR
BTAB1L1TT
Stable. Ho erosion
or bask failure.Bide
elopee <30*.
6-10
Moderately stable
Infrequent erosion
aoetly heeled over.
Side slopes to 40*.
B
6-6
Hoderatelr unstable. Unstable. Many erode'
Moderate eroelon and areae. Bide alopee
aide alopee to 60V. >60*. "Raw" areos
Hlih trot Ion during frequent on atral(ht
bi(b tlow. and bands.
3-6 0-2
6. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of etreeabank
covered by vegetation
or boulders and
cobblea.
50-79* covered by
vegetation, (ravel or
larger aaterlal.
e-e
25-49* covered by «25% covered by
vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel o
lar(er aaterlal. lar(er aaterlal.
3-6
0-2
9. BTREAHSIDE
Doalnant
vegetal Ion
Doalnsnt
vegetetlon
Doalnant
vegetetlon
>50* no
vegetation
COVIR
is
ehrub
Is of
tree fore.
la graee
or forbea.
Doalnant
aaterlal is
soil,rock, bridge
aeterlele
,culverts,o
c
*
sine taillnge.
I 9-10
e-e
3-5
0-2
COLUMH TOTALS
SCORE
\0 V
a-;.
-------
Rapid Bloassessmont Protocol I ^-r | o 5"
uff
Bloaurvey Field Data Sheet
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Porlphyton 0 (& 2 3
Filamentous Algae (tp 12 3
Macrophytea (IT) 12 3
Slims* 0 (£> 2 3 4
MicrolrtvedebrsU i 0 12 £3^ 4
Flih 0 1 (X 3 4
0 - Absent/Not Obierved
1 - Ran
2 - Common
3 - Abundant
4-Dominant.,
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(indlc«t« ruiitlv. Abundinc* n-P«r*. C-Common, A - Abundant, D-Oomtn*ni)
Porllera
Anlacplira
R
Chlronomldae
c
Hydroioa
Zygoplerm
C
Plicoptara
A
Platyhelmlnthea
Hamlplera
Ephimaroptar*
c.
Tbrbellarta
Colaoptora
C
THchoptam
A
Hlrudlnea
R
Lepldoplar*
Other
Ollgochaeta
C
SUIIdiB
Isopoda
K
Corydttldse
R
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldae
C
Occapoda
O
Empldldae
Gastropoda
Slmullldaa
PL
Blvalvla
Tabonldae
Cullcldae
P-
Rare < 3
Common 3-
B
Abundint > 10
Dornln*nt>50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Sheet for uia with Rapid Bioassesiment Protocol I.
-------
fZtbO DATA fMEET
c
t-
I o t
/I/-?
mtiicjll ouuaamrzM
nyMiJUi iott/i»»TiiAii rmrtnm
frodosiaaat l«rco«idlt| Uad Oi«t
- fUU/riit«r« Afric«lt«ril — l«il4t«tUl
L«caI tfittcibad Croiitit loai^ Modotato^ liivy
Local Vitarihad IfS Pollution! " >o tvldaic*
K«tI«*Cid Straaa Width *2— h Eatiaatad Strtia D«pth~7 ItfTlV
llfb Vatar Hark j
Caaapy Covcci opoa
¦tDtHt*T/«PB«T»ATEt
otfd'ri if Baraal
fl od i a a a t 011 • j
Coaaorclal (To d u a t Otb»r
Chiaacliiidi 7«a
foot
JlZl
Bodrocfc
C* bb I •
o ( t * • 1
>1 It
Clay
(10 tm. |
H-2U-+m (2.3-19 la.)
2-ii-mm 1-2.3 In.)
I 0(i
/ o
•£a(
n«t*ri
-------
HABITAT ASSES5HEIIT FIELD DATA SIIBBT
llaae of Water Body V" ° ^ St.tlon » / 0£
(/?- / / j^ Investigator ^ ^ •*
fate
CoBtien to
CAT E00R1FS
HABITAT
PARAMETER
IXCILLEHT
OOOD
FAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
>60* rubble.gravel,
30-50* rubble.gravel
10-30* rubble.grevel
<10X rubble,grave 1
SUBSTRATE/
aubaerged loga,
or other atable
or other atable
or other atable
AVAILABLE
undercut benke.or
habitat.
habitat. Habitat
habitat. Lack of
COVER
other atabla habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat la obvious
deilrabla.
18-20
11-15
to
0-5
2. EMBEDDED-
Orave1.cobble, and
Orave1,cobble, and
Or ate1.cobble, and
Qravel.cobble, and
HESS
boulder are <25*
boulder are 25-50X
boulder are 80-75*
boulder are >75X
aurrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
aurrounded by fine
aurrounded by fine
aedlaent.
aedlaent.
aedlaent.
aedlaent.
16-20
]S~ n"15
6-10
0-5
3. <= 5 crs
Cold: > 2 cfa
1-2 cfa
0.5-1 cfa
0.5 cfa
Karat >5 cfa
2-5 cfa
1-2 cfa
1 cfe
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
OB
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/a).deep
3 of 4 habltate
2 of 4 habltata
Doainated by one
l>0.5a);elov,ahallou
preaant. (Hleaing
present. tHleeing
velocity/depth
(<0.5B);feat(>0.3B/a)
riffle* or run*
rlfflaa/runa gat
category (ueually
deep) taat.ahallos
get lower ecore than
lover acora.)
pool).
habitat* all praeent
aleelng poola).
j 18-20
11-15
9-10
0-5
4. CHAHHBL
ALTKRATIOH
Little / no enlarge-
aent of lalanda or
point bare, and/or
no channelisation
12-15
Sob* new lncraaaa In
bar foraetion,aoetlr
froa coarit (ratal;
and/or iom cbannal-
laatlon preeent.
AA
e-ii
Moderate dapoaltlon
of nan gravel.coarae
aand on old and naw
bare;poola partially
(Iliad »/alltland/or
aabankaanta on both
bank a.
4-7
Heavy deposit* of
flee Material, bar
developaent lncraaaa
float poola filled «/
allt;and/or extenelve
channelliatlon.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOOBIHO
AHD
DEP0S1T10H
<5X of bottoa
af factad.
12-15
5-J0X atfactad . Boour
at oonatr lctlona and
eteep (radaa. Soaa
dapoaltlon In poola.
e-ii
30-50X affeoted.
Depoelt and scour at
obatruotlonai bend*,
and cooetrlotlone.
Bob* filling of poola
4-T
3r..
>50* bottoa changing
nearly raar long.
Poola absent dua to
dapoaltlon. Only
large rocka expoaed.
0-3
6. RUH/BIHD,
POOL/RlTfLK
RATIO**
6-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep rllflaa
and poola.
7-15. Adequate depth
in poola and riffle*
B«nda provide habitat
12-16 IO
8-11
15-25. Occasional
riffle or band.Bottoa
provide eoaa habitat
4-T
>25. leeeotiallr a
atralght atreaa. flat
eater or ahalloa
Poor habitat.
0-3
7. BANK
STABILITY
Btabla. Mo aroalon
or bank failure.Side
alopaa <30*.
..<£1
9-10
Hoderataly stable
Infrequent aroalon
aoetly healed over.
Side alopaa to 40*.
6-6
Moderately unatable.
Moderate aroalon aod
aide alopaa to 60*.
High aroalon during
high flow.
C" 3-6
Dnatabla. Many eroded
araaa. Bida alopaa
>60*. "Fa»" araaa
frequent on gtralght
and bands.
0-2
B. BAHK
VKJETATIVI
STABILITY
>00* of atraaabank
covered by vegetation
or bouldera and
cobblaa.
9-J0
.51.
50-79* covered by
vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterial.
e-s
25-49* covered by
vegetation, travel or
larger aatarial.
3-5
<25* covered by
vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterial.
0-2
9. STMAMSIDI Donlnant vegetation
COVKR la ahrub
Dosinant vegetetlon
la of tree for*.
Doelnant vegetation
le iriee or forbee.
1
e-e
3-5
>50* no vegetation
Dominant aaterial ia
aoll.rock. bridge
aateriala.culverta.or
Bine tallinga.
0-2
COLUHH TOTALS
SCORE J±
-------
il/WW
Flnpld Biousscssment Prolocol I
Dloamvcy Field Dnln Shoot
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC DIOTA
Parlphyton 0 1 2 C]&
Filamentous Algao 0 12 3
Macrophytes 1 2 3
Slimes 0 1
Macrolnverlcbmles 0 1
Flili 0 1
0-Absent/Not Observed
1 ¦ Rare
2 » Common
3 - Abundant
4 - Dominant
MACROBENTMOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(indlcai« n«ittlv« Abundinc* n - M»>i. C - Common, A • Abundint, D • Domininl)
Porllera
Anliopleta
CMronomlda#
£
Hydroioa
Zygoplem
A
Plocoplar*
c
Platyhalmlnthea
Memlptera
fK
Epheiniioptara
R
TUrbellorlo
Coleopteis
R.
li Iciioptera
c.
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoplei a
Ollm r
Ollgochaela
Slelldie
Isopoda
z
Corydalldno
Amphlpodo
c
Tlpulldoo
Decopoda
c
Ernpldldnc
. .
Gastropoda
Simulllitnr
Blvalvls
Tobnnldnp
I
Cullddnr
'
Rare < 3
Common 3-
9
A1 > u i i 50 (Estimate
Observations
&
»~fcj? Ij ^ ¦ ("V». c :
o U t &
Figure G.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Shoct (or uta with Ropni Llioaneument Protocol I.
•\ 1
-------
fizrb DATA SMKtT
G t f ( O ~~-j-
MTizot. amanzurxoi
tmiijui ion/niT»m rixTtrn^
fradoainaat Ivrrtuadlif Uad Oiti
CoaatrcU I
Ieduitrift O
Ot b • c
Local Viutahid Iroiltir Ned«tati
Local Vit«nbi4 IFS follutioat tvldtBC*
Kittaatid Itrna Width 7 - m .Kltiaittd Strtta D«ptbI IlClla Q t
119b tfat«r Mack \
Obi
luo
ro.i Q, 3
Ciaapf Covari Op«a
«tOTWt»T/»U»«TlATtI
Velocity
firfly Op«a
Daa fraaaat: Taa lo y/ Cbana*11tad1 7*t
Partly Siiadad Ihadad
Sadlaaat Odor at lorail
J «d1a«a t Oils:
f«dla«ot O«poalt«: Sludfa
5«vif a Ntralaua Cb«alcal
Jllgbt frafui®
favduat Fip«r r lb# r
A r • th« uadariidta of ito.ia «htcb iri sot daapljr iddtd blacks
faorvialc f«batrat« Co-p*a«a(a
tic
y l.llcr Sb« I 1 •
T • • 9 •
T*rp«
ltdrack
a• «1J«t
c« bb 1 •
0 t a ~ • I
1 a ad
lilt
CI ar
> 2 5 < -m | 1 0 la.)
<4 -J34-M (2.3-10 la . I
l-H-nm t « . 1- 2 . 5 la.)
1 ,oi-2.oi-aa (*rl ttrJ
.0O4-.««-aa
t .90 <>ta (alid)
fxc«ot
Caay••1t I •a
la liapl Ib^ Ihi
yo
/O .
Or^aalc lubitrat* Coap<
jubit r11 « T*
0*UlUl
RuCk-Hud
Karl
: 1 c
r • r c • • 1
Caapoa1tloa
t• S••p I (•« lri<
ftIcki . Vted.
C«•r a • fI 1 a I
RKtrlala |CFO«|
lUct, f »t y r I a •
or^ialc ( rron 1
Qr«f, Jh«ll
rri^atati
3°
70
WATI* QUALJTT
Tasparatar* ^ ^ C Oltaolwd Oiy|aa 13.1Z- P. 7 < 1^ Ctaduc11 vl ty J^£Z_ Oth.c
lait riiB.it I ¦ I Ui.d |4- ^0^6 V
Vatar Odoia / faraal/ Savaqa Patrolaua Cb«alc*l Bona Oih«r
Vatar Surface Ollit
j£xih««« Cloba fl«cka (^»oi a^^
Turbldltyi Clear ^11 IfhtTy Tur^TH^ Turbid Opaquo tfator Color ^ j~
VKATItl COVOITlOtJ ^ O *
PKOTOOBAftt PUH»t«
-------
I'aoe of
HABITAT ASSESSMENT PlF.Ll) DATA SHRRT
>f Hater Rnri» C-vr>U c, i a 1.11> « I Q~l~
Pate I!/ y Inv*etIg* tor ra*-—/ / ^ V/'M-v Cf-
CoBBenta
CATEGORIES
HABITAT
PARAMETER
EXCELLENT
OOOD
MIR
POOR
I. BOTTOM
>5o* rubble.grsvel,
30-50* rubble.gravel
10-30* rubble.gravel
<10* rubble,gravel
SUBSTRATE/
aubaerged logs,
or other stable
or other atable
or other stable
AVAILABLE
undercut banks,or
hsbltat,
habitat. Hsbitst
habitat. Lack of
COVER
other stable habitat
Adequate habitat.
availability <
habitat la obvious.
desirable.
J g 16-20
11-15
6-10
1
o
«
IP
2. EMBIDDIO-
QreveI.cobble, and
Ora re 1,cobble, and
Orare].cobble, end
Oravel,cobble, snd
HE55
boulder are <25*
boulder are 25-50*
boulder are 50-75*
boulder are >75*
eurrounded by fine
surrounded by fine
eurrounded by fine
eurrounded by fine
sedlaent.
sedlnent.
eediaent.
aedlaent.
( 16-20
11-15
6-10
o
1
3. <= 5 CF8
Cold; > 2 cfs
1-2 cfs
0.5-1 cfs
0.5 cfs
Hare; >6 cfs
2-6 cfs
1-2 cfs
1 cfs
10-20
11-15
6-10
0-5
OR
>5 CFS
Slow (<0.3 a/a).deep
3 of 4 habltata
2 of 4 habitats
Doainated by one
(> 0.5b);alow,she 1 low
preaent. (Mlaalng
present. (Hissing
velocity/depth
(<0.5a);faat(>0.3b/b)
rlfflea or runa
riffles/runs get
category (usually
deep; fast,ehallow
gat lower acore than
lower score.)
pool).
habltata all present
b 1 aa 1 ng poo la).
16-20
6-10
0-5
4. CHAHIIBL
ALTERATION
Little / no enlarge-
aent of ialande or
point bars. and/or
no channelisation
12-15
Sob* new increaae In
bar foraat Ion.Boatly
froi coarae gravel;
and/or aoai cbannel-
1 ja 11 on preaen t.
I)
8-11
Moderate depoaitlon
of mi gravel,coarae
aand on old and n»o
bare;poole partially
flllad w/eiltjend/or
esbankaente on both
banka.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine Baterial, bar
development Increase
Moat pools flllad w/
allt;and/or extensive
channelization.
0-3
5. 80TTQH
SC0URIH0
AHD
DEPOSITION
<6* of bottoa
affactad.
5-30* affactad . Scour
at oonatrlctlona and
ateap (radaa. Soae
dapoaltlon In poola.
12-15
u
»-ll
30-50* affeoted. >50* bottoa changing
Depoalt aod acour at nearly Tear long,
obatruotlone, bends. Pools absent due to
and coostriotions. dapoaltlon. Only
Boae filling of poola large rocks exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEMD.
pooi/RirrLi
RATIO**
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Dasp riffles
and poola.
.it.
12-16
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occassional >25. Essentially a
in pools and rlfflaa riffle or band.Bottoa straight atrsaa. Flat
Bends provide habitat provide soas habitat eater or shallow
Poor habitat.
8-11 4-T 0-3
1. BAHR
ETAB1LITT
Stable. Mo arosloo
or buk fallurs.Bide
slopes <30*.
8-10
Boderataly atable
Infrequent erosion
aoetly haalad over.
Bids slop-as to 40*.
.£
fl-8
Hodsratelr unatable.
Moderate eroaioo aod
aids elopes to SOX.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-6
Dostable. Hany eroded
areaa. Side slopes
>60*. "Res" ar«*a
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
6. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of streaabank
covered by vegetation
or bouldere and
eobblee.
e-io
50-7W* covered br
vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterial.
25-49* covered by <25* covered by
vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or
larger aaterial. larger aaterial.
C9. io
6-8
6TREAMSIDE Doalnant vegetation
COVER la shrub
9-10
"Utii."
Doalnant vegetation
la of tree fora.
8-0
3-5
Doalnant vegetation
1« grata or forbes.
3-5
0-2
>50* no vsgststlon
PoBlnant BSterial le
soil,rock, bridge
Bate rials,culverts,or
Bine tailings.
0-2
COLUHM TOTALS
6C0PE 11 I
-------
Rapid Bfoassessment Protocol I
(0?
M/V^
Blosurvey Field Dotn Shoot
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Parlphyton 0 1 (g) 3 4
Filamentous Algae ra) I 2 3 4
Macrophytes (o/ 1 2 3 4
Slimes
Macrolnveitebralas
Flail
<& 1.
0 1
0 ^
3 4
4
& 4
0-Absent/Not Obterved
1 - Rnre
2 » Co mmon
3 - Abundant
4 » Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST (indict i« Afcundmc# n . n«n, C - Common, A • Aimndirrt, D » Domln«nl)
Porllere
Anlsoplera 1
Clilronomldae (7_.
Hydroioa
Zygoptera A
f'ltcoplera
Platyhelmlnthes
Hamlptera
Ephemeroptera
TUrbellarla
Coleoplera
Trlclioptara J?
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoplera
Oilier
Ollgochaela ^
Slalldao
Isopoda
Corydalldee
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldno
Decepoda (T^
Empldidoo
Gastropoda
Slmullldae
Blvalvla
Tabanldne
Cullcldne
Rare < 3
Common 3-9
Abundant ;¦ 10
Dominant >50 (Eallmate)
Observations ,
LO C<
^ S" O i—i >>
dp^\_ v >.»-*¦ ^ ~hJ*-* f
<_C U) L^c—K^A.
1
hi f
Figure 6.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Data Sheet for ule with Rapid Bioaneument Protocol I.
A-7
-------
ISLO DATA. SUClf
d. f /o e>
HTfZCAL OUUCTUZUTIM
umtjji tow/fiTHAH riArpin
fridoalBAit Serreu»dlefL»»d 0i«
rl*ld/Piit«r«Afrlcaltaral
ll*l
Otb*C
Local Vatarahad KroiUi; (loo* e* Hodarata l«tTy
«Tid«iC«
5th 2. t | N liTiiitid Jtraaa Dapchi llffla O i
On Praaaatl 7«i
Op*a ^firtly Op«t/ rartlf 3li«d*d
HDIHt»T/IU»«T.>T«.
Sadlaaat OdflfI i 3avaqa NU«l«ua Chaalcal
ladlaaot Olla : (Ab^lt^, SllqbC Xodtrat* frt fui#
Obvious
luo O . I—
t 9 • I
0. 3
Vtloelty
rirtly op«i
>o
)kld«d
ehaaaaX1 aad: T«i
Xa••roblc
l 2 54-u (10 1b.)
4 4-2U-+* (2.1-19 la . 1
3-4 4-aa | • . l-l . 5 la.)
t.OC-i.fla-a* (t r 111 y j
.004-.9ft-aa
(.904 -m lalicti)
F • c c • a t
Caapa•1t 1 ••
I¦ 1•¦p 1 1e « irii
§0 7,
/O
/o
Of^ia lc lubit r •I t C»«pen«wt i
lubitnt*
1X21
1 c
Ottrlui
RuCI
* • r 1
lUcki , V« o d ,
C••(•« ftiot
11r1•ti |crom|
Hid, ~ • r 7 r I a •
Organic If fOH I
0 r • y , J h • 1 1
rri^a««ti
fticial
C O »pO • I t t Q•
la 5 • *0 I I i4 l>r««
'2JO?'
i
VATtl QUALX7T
Taapvritar* 1 OWc
Iiatcna«at(i) 0a«d
Olnolvad Oin«a ( \ • ^ p*
¦'i-^ 4 C»*~
(o. U
Ca aduc 11 v 11y ^ ^
Otbar
Itraat Typa: Coldvatar
ttatac Odorai afaal/^
tfatar Jurfaca 0/la:
Turb1di ty i CIaaf
Varawatai
Sava^a I
Slick Sbaaa
illfbtly Turbid
l«ua Cb aalcal
Cl oba rl*cka
Turbid Opaqua
WKATBC1 CO«DtTtO«3
lo"F
J2._k^
PKOTOOSArv iUH»ri
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMENT FIELD DATA SIIBBT
I'aee of Water Body C-a-hX- Station » / & ^
Tate 11/ 7 / *7 V Investigator tc- L/1—
Concente I
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATIOORIKS
EXCELLENT
QOOD
TA1R
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>50* rubble,grave 1,
eubaerged loge,
undercut benka.or
other (table habitat
"V
16-20
30-50* rubble,grave1
or other (table
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10- 30% rubble,gravel
or other (table
habitat. Habitat
availability <
dealrabla.
8-10
<10* rubbLa,gravel
or other (table
habitat. Lack of
habitat la obvloua.
0-5
2. EMBSDDED-
Oravel.cobble
, and
0raie1.cobble. and
Oravel.cobble, and
Oravel, cobble. and
nsss
boulder are
<25*
boulder are 25-50X
boulder are 60-15*
boulder are >75*
aurrounded by
fine
rurroundsd by fine
surrounded by fine
aurrounded by fine
aedlaent.
eedleent.
eedlaent.
eedlaent.
I G
18-20
11-15
8-10
0-5
3. <= 5 CFS
OR
>5 CFS
4. CHANHBL
ALTEHATIOH
Cold; > 2 cfe
Hara; >i cfe
10-20
Slow (<0.3 a/e),deep
(>0.5a);elow,ehellow
(<0.5b);faat(>0.3b/b)
deepi feat .shallow
habltata all preeent
18-20
1-2 cfe
2-6 cfe
11-15
3 of 4 habltata
rreaent. (Hlaelna
rlfflea or rune
let lower acore than
el aa ln( poole).
11-15
.LSI.
0.5-1 cfe
1-2 cf(
6-10
2 of 4 habltata
present. (Hieelnf
r 1 f f lee/runa (et
loner acore.)
8-10
0.5 cfa
1 cfe
0-5
Doalnated by one
velocity/depth
cateiorr (usually
pool).
0-5
Little / no enlarge-
ment of ielanda or
point bare, end/or
no channelliatlon
13
12-15
Soae new lncreaae in
bar forvatIon,aoatIt
froa coarse gravel;
and/or loae ebannel-
laatlon preeent.
8-11
Moderate depoaition
of ne» gravel,coarae
eand on old and nev
bare;pool( partially
filled «/alit|and/or
eabankaenta on both
banka.
4-7
Heavy depoelte of
tine material, bar
development lncreaae
Hoet poole filled w/
allt;and/or extenaive
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCO0R1HO
AND
DEPOSITION
<6* of bottoa
affected.
IS-
12-15
6-30* affacted.Boour
at oonatrJctiona and
eteep grades. SoBe
depoaition In poola.
8-11
30-50* affeoted.
Depoalt end acour at
obatruotiona. bende.
and coditriotlona.
>50* bottoa cbanfini
nearly year long.
Pool( abeeDt due to
dapodtion. Only
8oae filling, of Poo la large rocke axpoaed.
4-T
0-3
6. RliH/BIHD,
POOL/RIFFLE
RATIO**
8-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep rlfflea
and poola.
/*>
12-15
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Occaaalonal >25. I»eentlally a
in poole «nd rlfflee riffle or band.Bottoa atraifht atreaB. Flat
Benda provide habitat provide aose habitat aatar or (halloa
Poor habitat.
8-11 4-7 0-3
7. BANK
STABILITY
Stable. Mo eroelon
or bank failure.Bide
alopea <30*.
Moderately atable
Infrequent eroelon
Boetly healed over.
Side alopea to 40*.
-fer-
9-10
0
8-8
Hoderately unetable.
Moderate eroelon aod
aide alopea to 60*.
High eroelon during
high flow.
3-5
Onetable. Many eroded
areaa. Bide alopea
>60*. "Raw" areaa
frequent on atralght
and bende.
0-2
6. BANK >80* of atreaabank 50-T9* covered br 25-49* covered by <25* eovered by
VEGETATIVE covered by vegetation vegetation, gravel or vegetation, (ravel or vegetation, (ravel or
STABILITY or bouldere and larger aaterlal. larger ¦atarial. larger material,
cobbles.
9-10 6-B 3-5 0-2
8. STREAMSIDE Dominant vegetation
COVER la ahrub
9-10
Doalnant vegetation
la of tree fora.
8-0
Dcalnant vegetation
la graae or forbea.
3-5
>50* no vegetation
Doalnant aaterlal la
soil,rock, bridge
¦ateriale.culverta.or
Bine talllnge.
0-2
COLUMN TOTALS
SCORE
XT
TV
1
-------
£e (0 8
1>/V/Tf
Rapid Bloir.'.ucssuiL'nt Piotocol I
Dlo3ui\cy n»ld Dnln SliciM
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC DIOTA
0 (p 2 3
Perlphyton
Filamentous Algoo
Macrophytea
SllmoB (oj 1. 2
Macrulii'ef lrt"nl» t 0 12
rial) 0 1 2
1
3
0» Absent/Not Observed
1 - Hare
2 » Common
J - Abundant
4 - Dominant
MACflOBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST(indiciH n«i»iK • Abundtnc# n.l\«n. C - Common, A » Abundmt, D » Domlninl)
Observations
Porlfera
Anliopltia
d
CMironomldaa
Hydrozoa
Zygoptem
c
f'lecoptara
Platylialmlnthoa
MamlplRio
Cphenmoptan
"Hjrbellarla
Coleoplf in
Tiichoplata
Hlrudlneo
Lapldopteta
Ollior
Ollgochacta (7^
Slalldac
laopoda
Corydnlnlro
Amplilpodn
"Tlpulldno
K.
Decapodn
Empldldnc
Gasttopodn
Slinullltlnr
Blvalvle
Tabnnldftr
Cullcldnr
1
Rare < 3 Common 3-
9
Aliwndanl • lu
Dominant >50 (Eitlmata)
Figure G.1-1. Bioiurvey Field Datn Sltoet for uta witli Mepid Uioauenment Piotocol I.
-------
Cp£ toB
/'/
;y?Ai?-.E::rr assessment sheet
1. Detection of inpair-cnt r' Irpa:r^ent ic1ecTed^j No impairment
Vt^Corpie'.e 1t e~u__2 -6) detected
(Stop here)
2. Biological irnpa :: ~.*n : : r..::; a : cr .
SentKjc mac r o: ir. t: : i--j: ,i • o b Otr.e. aquatic communities
V absence ot : ,i'a Per i pliy ton
dominance ji toie.-jnt groups _ filarentous
lov benthi: abur-.jar.ce other
lov taxa richncs; Macropn;. tes
other Sii~es
Fish
P i : «J t description ot C • ^ £ PT
Year and date u: ;. i • vt.",.
Suf.ev da u a . a : I .i o ; c ; :
lause: (indicate -.-.-or :auso) (gTjan i c er.r l cnnenT^) toxicants flow
habitat 1 i_,i'.a: . ins other
Estimated areal «¦ : t.-t of probien (m") and length of Stream reach
affected (n), .here ippiicable:
6. Suspected sourcets) ot problem:
point source rfiscrarge tnane. type of facility, location)
construction si•e runoff
combine1; St.or outfall
s i 1 v i cu 11 rjno.'f
animal lee".'.":
agr l cu! ; u: .i: :.i:v.::
urban rur.o::
ground -ate:
other
___ unknown
Briefly explain:
UtibiUk V-f. 0C-tA~k- ^ '2.O. o4
to fO —-tj (i l*.\ cr^Lj fix* L>A C& yi d <»
s^ ^ _
Figure 6.1-2. Impairment Assessment Sheet for use with macronu crtoforate Rapid Bioassessment Protocols.
-------
t.iLB DATA «*II.
6t" SiK^^-i
mixcu ciuiCTmuriM
IIHltM »Q»«/I»IT«KAM flATVltl
(ftJuluat ItfttiiadUf Laad Uaat
Faraal - //fl«ld/F«iUit^ Africaltaral - In
Lac a I Mttifihtd Iioalaa ^^¦ona Hadarata Baawy
illtftloai sfto avidaaca
».3« iP-r t a H aTfad Strata Dapthl llfMa
Coaaatcla1
Oth.r
Obt
lua
>9*1
'lib "alar Nark |-
Caaapf Catari Opaa
HDIIHW/iUHTIATt I
Sadlaaat Odata i^>«ta«^
fadlaaat Ollai ^biaat ^
ftadlaaat D.paaltai llwdf*
Oaa Praaaat t
Cbaaaaliaadl
Ot bar
r
¦adrack
r
Cabbt a
0 r a va I
Saa J
(lit
Clar
»ll«-aa (t« ta.)
«-l)(-aa (1.5-1# la.I
1-14-aa |«.1-1.1 la.)
««-m ( « r 111 r )
r«cc«Bt
CaapaaItIaa
a I aapl la^ ioa
10 ?o
*L>
i o
<.•04-u ( • I i ck |
Of^iiiC Co>pon«ftt i
: I c
0«t r1tn»
Xuc k-*w4
c I
ftlcta, Vted.
Ce • r • • f Uat
M* t•r 1 « 1 t ICion\
11«ct, T«fy fI a•
Off isle IffO«|
Ht«y . J h•I I
fri^actti
t • i c • • l
Ciapta1C1•¦
li S • I IHrn
sr°
yo
wirta qualitt
Taaparatata C Diaaalvad Oiyfaa pi _____ Caaductlvlty Othar
viatic* coiditioij -j
PN0T0akA»'« HUNItl
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMBIIT FIELD DATA SIIBBT
Haas of Water Body f-C'-k Station * (
Pate M/ / ¥ */ Investigator ^ /H Q-<* cL ^~~~J
Coonente.
HABITAT
PARAMETER
CATEGORIES
EXCELLEHT
OOOD PAIR
POOR
1. BOTTOM
SUBSTRATE/
AVAILABLE
COVER
>50* rubble,gravel,
aubaergsd logs,
undercut benke.or
other stable habitat
16-20
30-50* rubble,gravel 10-30* rubble,(ravel
or other atable or other stable
habitat. habitat. Habitat
Adequate habitat. availability <
. desirable.
J CJL 11-15 6-10
<10* rubble,grafel
or other stable
habitat. Lack of
habitat la obvious.
0-5
2. EMBEDDID-
HKSS
Orevel.cobbla, and
boulder are <25*
surrounded br fine
sedlaent.
18-20
.s.
Orare 1,cobble, and
boulder aira 25-50*
surrounded br fine
eedleent.
11-15
Oreve 1 ,cobbla, and
boulder are 80-75*
eurroundad br fine
eedlaent.
6-10
Gravel.cobble, and
boulder are >75*
aurrounded br fine
sedlaent.
0-5
3. <= 5 Cf6
OR
>5 CPS
Cold;
Nan
> 2 cfs
; >6 cf«
10-20
Slow (<0.3 a/a).deep
(>6. 5b);alow,ehallou
|(0.5a);Clit<>0.3a/e)
daapi fast,ahallou
habitate all present
16-20
4. CHAHHBL
ALTERAT10H
Little / no enlarge-
aent of ialanda or
point bara, and/or
no channel liatlon
1-2 cfe
2-6 cfs
11-15
3 of 4 habitate
preeent. (Hissing
rlfflea or rune
let lover acore than
alee Li\| poola ) .
9oaa neu increaae in
bar foraatlon.Boat It
froa coaree (ravel:
and/or aoae channel-
laatlon preaent.
0.5-1 cfs
1-2 cfa
6-10
2 of 4 habitate
present. (Hissing
riffles/runs cat
louer acore.)
8-10
0.5 cfa
1 cfe
0-5
Doalnated br one
velocltr/depth
cateiorr (usually
pool).
0-5
f<-\: 12-15 6-11
Moderate depoaltlon
of nea grsve1,coaree
«and on old and nee
bara;poola partially
filled */eilt|and/or
eebankeenta on both
banka.
4-1
Heavy depoalta of
fine •aterlel, bar
developaent Increaae
Host poola filled u/
allt;and/or extenelve
channelisation.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SCOORIHO
AHD
DEPOSIT10H
<5* of bottoa
affected.
.1.1
12-15
5-30* affectad.Ooour
at oonatr lctlons and
etesp iradea. Soas
d»roeltlon In poola.
e-ii
30-50* affeoted. >50* bottoa changing
Deposit and acour at nearlr Tear long,
obstructions, bends. Foola abaent due to
and codstrlotions. deposition. Only
8o»e filling of poola large rocka exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RUH/BEHD,
POOL/RIMLE
RATlO»«
5-7. Variety of
habitat.Deep riffles
and pools.
7-15. Adequate depth
in poole and riffles
Bends provide habitat provide aoae habitat
15-25. Occassional >25. Isseotlallr a
riffle or bend.Bottoa strslght streaa. Flat
.11.
12-16
6-11
4-7
¦atsr or ahallow
Poor habitat.
0-3
7. BANK
STABILITY
Stable. Mo erosion
or baok failure.Bide
slopes <30*.
.1
9-10
Hoderatalr atable
Infrequent erosion
aoetlr healed over.
91de elopes to 40*.
6-6
Hoderatalr unstable.
Moderate arosloo and
aide alopea to 60*.
High erosion during
high flow.
3-5
Unstable. Many eroded
araaa. Bide slopes
>60%. "Re*" areas
frequent on straight
and bends.
0-2
B. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>60* of atreeabank
covered br vegetation
or bouldere and
cobblea.
0-10
50-79* covered br 25-49* covered br <25* covered br
vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or vegetation, gravel or
larger aeterlal. larger aatsrlal. larger aatarlal.
±G>
8. STRSAHS1DE Doalnant vegetation
COVIR la ehrub
fl-8
3-5
0-2
Doelnant vegetation
la of tree fora.
10
9-10
Jill"
Doelnant vegetation
la graaa or forbee.
3-5
>50* no vegetation
Doelnant aatarlal la
aoil.rock. bridge
aateriale,culverts,or
Bine tailings.
0-2
COLUMN TOTALS
_Z1
SCORE
-------
I 0*1
\50 (Eillmale)
Observations
Figure G.1-1. Bioiurvey Field DaM Slioet for u>o wiih Hepiii Diosj mjment Protocol I.
*\ - 7
-------
>.4L0 DAT* »«CI1
I— j Jk ^ u
Q:
mtiicu auuanxunM
llmlli Wt/tHTKM HiTVIH
frodoaiaaat (arrouadlaf Ltid Otat
^fNld^T«it»n XfilciltKil
tacil Watarahod Iriitm S Madatata
Local tratorahad BM Vollutiaai Bo avldaaca
litUttid ltia«« tftdtb f)y, S~ « .C«tlBtt«d Str««a D«ptht llff 1*
Blfb V>t«r Ntik 0;*S" ¦ Valaclty _____ Dia frxaati Toa
Caatpf Cavart Op«a
UBimat/miiTHTti
lodlaaat Odor
otb*r
¦»t«7
CTf»a« Patoatial lootcia
J
obi
luo
JyA 4 ^ cr I j- cUa.
aM-
* a • 1
—-—. —.
ftrtly Op««
*o (£bTn
So
fart If 3 fcadad
Sh«d«d
Ch mm 1 e• 1
S«wa^« Patral
Slight Mod* r¦t•
tivdu•t t*
&r* tht ued«ntd«i a{ •(•••• vblch in tot d»«plf iddad bUcW
taor?«olc tmbatraf Co*p»»t
l«dla«ot Oils
l«dl*«ot Dapoiltf t Iludf«
Q
S a a
JLA««roblc to
1.1 let Ifa.l la
T.a V> fv/
lubitnta *TP*
l«dr*ck
!•«1Jar
C • b b I •
0 r <1
l«a«i
lilt
c i*r
~ 15<-u (10 I m . |
4 U}l(-ta (1.3-1# la. I
1-44-.. li.l-J.S In. I -
drlltr)
.004-.M-«a
<.i0i-u (•11ck i
t•c c «ot
Caapta1II••
t ¦ 1 tap Mag 1 r • a
! oC>
I e
0«t r11wa
KuCt -Mud
Ha ( 1
Itlcli . w«od.
C* a r• • f1•ol
Ritaclili ICfOfl|
I I •ct , V«ry r I a«
Organic ( Tton I
Of »j-, 3 b • 1 1
Fra^aaata
t a 3 • • p 1 1 a ^ JL r a •
— sr^
cLi
cS
<- ca *-y*—" \ ^
Taa^aratar* I *V 1 ^ C Dlaa«lv«d oiyfti 2 i3l pa C» * Caaductlvlty V
I»at(M>«at(i| Oaad __ S
-------
HABITAT ASSESSMENT FIELD CAT A SIIHBT
-cif'C-
H»B« of Water Body Dr"""i^ A 6-—-
|f fr—50* rubble.(ravel,
aubaariad loia,
undercut banka.or
other atabla habitat
16-20
30-50* rubble.grave 1
or other etable
habitat.
Adequate habitat.
11-15
10-30* rubble,(ravel
or other stable
habitat. Habitat
availability <
dealrable.
6-10
<10* rubble,travel
or other atabla
habitat. Lack of
habitat la obvious.
£~ 0-5
2. EHBEDDED-
HESS '
Oravel.oobbla, and
boulder are <25*
aurroundad by fine
aedlaent.
18-20
~ ravel .cobble, end
boulder are 25-60*
aurroundad by fine
eedlnent.
11-15
Orave1,cobble, and
boulder are (0-75*
aurroundad by fine
aedlaent.
8-10
Oravel,cobble, and
boulder are >75*
aurrounded by fine
eediaent.
0-5
3. <= 5 crs
OP
>5 CPS
Cold: > 2 cfa
Hare; >5 cfa
10-20
1-2 cfa
2-5 cfa
11-15
0.5-1 cfa
1-2 cfa
6-10
0.5 cfa
1 cfa
0-5
Slow (<0.3 a/a),daep
elcw.shsllow
(<0.5a);faet(>0.3a/s)
deep) fast.ahallov
habltata all preaent
18-20
3 of 4 habltata
preeent. (Hitting
rlfflaa or runt
gat lower acoia than
Blealng pool*).
11-15
2 of 4 habltata
preeent. (Hlaalni
rlfflea/runa |et
lower acora.)
8-10
Doalnated by one
velocity/depth
cateiory (ueually
poo 11.
5" 0-5
4. CHAHHEL
ALTERATIOH
Little / no enlarie-
aent of lelanda or
point bare, and/or
no ehannalliatlon
12-15
Soa* new Increase in
bar forest Ion, eoet It
froa coarse (ravel;
and/or eoae cbannel-
liatlon preeent.
#-11
Hoderate depoaltlon
of new travel.coarae
eand on old and new
b»rt;poole partially
(Iliad w/ellt|end/or
eabankaenta on both
bania.
4-7
Heavy deposits of
fine aaterlal, bar
davelopaent Increase
hoet pools filled u/
allt;and/or extenelve
channelization.
0-3
5. BOTTOM
SC00RIH0
AHD
DEPOSITION
<6* of bottoa
affacted.
12-13
6-30* affected.8 oour
at oonetrletlone and
ateep iradee. Scat
deroeltion In poola.
8-11
30-BOX affeoted. >50* bottoa chaining
Depoalt and aeour at naarlr rear loaf,
obstructions, bends. Poola absent due to
and cooetrlotloni. dapoaitlon. Only
Boat flllinj of poola large rocke exposed.
4-7 0-3
6. RliH/BEHD.
POOL/WILE
RATlOaa
7. BAHK
STABILITY
6-7. Variety of
hibltat.Deep rllflaa
and poola.
7-15. Adequate depth 15-25. Oecaaalonal >25. laaantlallr a
In poola and rltflaa riffle or band.Bottoa atralfht atraaa. flat
Banda provide habitat provide eoaa habitat water or shallow
Foot habitat.
12-15 8-11 4-T 3 0-3
Stable. Ho aroiloo
or bask failure.Bide
slopas <30*.
8-10
Boderately atabla
Infrequent aroalon
aoatlr healed over.
Bide alopaa to 40*.
8
e-e
Hodaratalr unatable.
Moderate aroaloo and
aide alopaa to 80k.
Hl(h aroalon durltu
hlih flow.
3-5
Ooatabla. Many eroded
araaa. Blda alopaa
>80*. "Raw" araaa
fraquant en atralcht
and banda.
0-2
8. BAHK
VEGETATIVE
STABILITY
>80* of atraaabank
covered by veietatlon
or bouldera and
eobblea.
I o #-i°
50-79* covered by
veietatlon. (ravel or
larier aaterlal.
8-6
25-49* covered by <25* covered by
vegetation, travel or veietatlon. (revel or
larier aaterlal. larier aaterlal.
3-5
0-2
B. 6TREAMSIDE Doalnant vegetation
COVER la ahrub
Doalnant veietatlon
la of tree for*.
Doalnant veietatlon
Is iriaa or forbea.
e-e
.....
5"
>50* no veietatlon
Doalnant aaterlal la
aoll.rock. bridle
¦aterla la.culverta.or
Bine taillnia.
0-2
COLUHH TOTALS
SCORE
_2_
"3.V
-------
Rapid Bloassessment Protocol I
Blosurvoy Field Data Sheet
6c
(DO
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF AQUATIC BIOTA
Perlphyton 0 1
Filamentous Algae 1
Mecrophytes (5^ 1
2 3
2 3 4
2 3 4
Slimes 0
Macrolnverlebrstes 0
Fish (IT)
3 4
1 4
1 4
0» Absent/Not Observed
1 - Rare
2 » Common
3 - Abundant
4 ¦ Dominant
MACROBENTHOS QUALITATIVE SAMPLE LIST (indicate n»l«dv» Atiundtnc* n . n»n, C • Common, A • AJujndirrt, 0 • Dominant)
Porlfera
Anlaoplera
Chlronomldae "p
Hydrozoa
Zygoptem
Plecoptera
Platyhelmlnthes
Hamlpleto
tphernaroplerm
Tbrfoellarla
Coleopleia f\
"trlchoptera
Hlrudlnea
Lepldoplera
Oilier
Ollgochaela fJ
Slalldao
Isopoda
Corydalldao
Amphlpoda
Tlpulldao
Oecapoda
Empldidac
Gastropoda
Slmullhlae
Blvalvla
Tabanldat
Cullcldoe
Rare <3 Common J-9 Abundant > to OomlnanO 50 (Estimate)
Observations
Figure 6.1-1. Bioturvsy Field Data Sheet tor ute with Rapid Biosuetiment Protocol I.
-------
Number and type of fish collected in streams in the vicinity of GE/Shepherd Farm
Superfund Site, East Flat Rock, North Carolina, November 1994.
Fish
Species
GE Sampling Stations
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Creek Chub
Semotilus
atromaculatus
5
26
50
46
32
20
4
15
23
Dace
Rhinichthys
atratulus
36
51
40
26
1
10
Bluehead Chub
Nocomis
leptocephalus
Sucker
Catostomus
commersoni
2
3
8
Bluegill
Lepomis macrochirus
1
2
Redbreast Sunfish
Lepomis aurltus
6
Sunfish species
Centrarchidae
7
Darter
Etheostoma sp.
1
Total Collected
5
26
87
97
72
46
15
28
39
Total Gram Weight
38
109
168
273
186
121
418
112
585
-------
APPENDIX D
Chain-of-Custody Forms
and
Results of Chemical Analysis
-------
\ o4 a
sEPA
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
REGION 4
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
913*^
39
1V
ft
PROJECT NO.
— £©^,'5, WftfoJECT LEADER
ct^-e§M-lg-K Ar,ub, >/W raw
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
COLLEGE STATION ROAD
ATHENS. GEORGIA 30613-7799
PROJECT ,
NAME/LOCATION
-/£keiaki*d ran**, ^vjpovvo^&fe, /wtk Oa^u^i
tSD SAMPLE TYPES ISAk/pLERS (SIGN) -4
1. SURFACE WATER
2. GROUND WATER
J. POTABLE WATER
4. WASTEWATER
5. LEACHATE
11. OTHER
6. SOIL/SCDMENT
7. SLUfcC
8. WASTE
ft. AIR
^T^TSH
STATION NO.
19
DATE
TIME
7
STATION LOCATION/DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
NO./REMARKS
LAB
USE
ONLY
i£LL
10
U-g
Urwvaw.*^ cB<^cJcj^v ovw^
\OA
to
W=3,
H3c
^tfac^rw t>,S
y
M^S" ?-S~"
10^
10
ikSl
ibSO
~
UA.tr«2c<.tw ixs>,
lo 3
lo
n-2
fWL Of. Clp^CIv.
Jtenct
*/
IQ3
lo
a-?
lfeK/
{0 M
vo
u-S
PHO
Ba^fuK-G".
ro4
10
ii=i.
1710
Fw k o . i£ope r
~
Hgrso
I©
ihl
o13d
frtferlG. QtS, ££,;
|B4-^
ibi
013b
Hgrsa.
To
vo
l(-^
ad uOTf>
U-'
HgTg3
t&p
iq
iiil
i2fe
tAhiLtCt <& uorf
~
\o"9~
10
u-1
fafc-Oc. £**> 6-
4^r
lo^
]0
11=1
Ofeo
och-Gc. [\g>, Cg.£
ucs-e^
lo"?
(o
M.
*f£e>(I^Cr at
[oV
LO
Uzl
tfo<
t
fW tWl Cr. cA~
10^
lpln-?U3i3
fW~ fb^k- dr. X)^- labo
REUNQUJ
(PRINT)
15
DATE/TIME
n-ts-^
\M^O
DECEIVED. BY.. \ v
(PRINT]I j) Ij^O. '
facN)
VaV^c
REUNQUiSHEO BY
(PRINT)
(SICH)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVEO BY
(PRINT)
1221.
REUNQUISHEO BY:
(PRINT)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY-
(PRINT)
RELINQUISHED BY
(PRINT)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY
(PRINT)
(SOW)
(SIGH)
OCH)
(SIGN)
DISTRIBUTION: Vl#ilte and Pink copies accompany sample shipment to laboratory; Pink copy retained by laboratory,
Wilte copy Is returned to samplers; Yellow copy retained by samplers
•U.S. (,PO* 1969- til - 1 H(t
4- 20599
(10/89)
-------
3<^a
SERA
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
REGION 4
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
COLLEGE STATION ROAD
ATHENS. GEORGIA 30613-7799
PROJECT NO. _
PROJECT LEADER^
REMARKS
cM-
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION^
W
II
n-f«r
U3o
~
^levx^eX" XV? tpLeu^W-i
|
/
s
9~<*0
M
l^LoO
J
11 v0Cu. Xcjc_
A
IS
/
3-(*>0
LI
U-/U
-tDoO
y
*
U Dew "Xte 8lc.uk
\
r
27-0
ll
U-iH
IH3D
^>TU :pKSL 30lwI<-
f '
p?o
II
11-14
Itft
*¦
XToe.
y
1
REUNOfiKHEQ BY: # Li^rr^ *
(print) v|S3Sp v ocfro^4.
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED «. v vV,
(PRINT) _T> V _A0 ,.7\C
RELINQUISHED BY:
(PRINT)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY-
(PRINT)
(SGN) A? I O/VL^f
Lt—lo—
IH30
(SCN)
(S1CN)
RELINQUISHED BY: ^
(PRINT)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY: |V
(PRINT) v
RELINQUISHED BY-
(PRMT)
DATE/TIME
RECEIVED BY:
(PRINT)
(SON)
(SIGN)
(SICK)
(SIGN)
DISTRIBUTION:
Wilte and Pink copies accompany sample shipment to laboratory. Pink copy retained by laboratory.
Write copy is returned to samplers; Yellow copy retained by samplers
GPO 1 9B'»- TIM fl»»
4- 2060(3'
0/89)
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA. ESD, REGION IV, ATHENS. GA
SAMPLE DATA LOG
SAMPLE NO. 95C91364 PROJECT NO. 95-0090
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/08/94
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
TESTS: PESTICIDES SCAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF
STATION 101
STORET STATION NO
1615 SAMPLE COLLECTION:
SAMPLE TYPE FISH
COLLECTED BY 6 BERRANG
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430
INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
ORGANIC SCAN
CONFIDENTIAL
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
REC'D BY D COLQUITT
SAS NO.
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91385 PROJECT NO. 95-0090
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/08/94
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
STATION 102
STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
1630 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430
INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
REC'D BY D COLQUITT
SAS NO.
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91386 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 103
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/08/94 1645 SAMPLE COLLtCTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B RFRRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR.
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91387 PROJECT NO. 95-0090
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/08/94
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN
PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
STATION 104
STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
1710 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP OATE/TIME 00/00/00
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430
INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
REC'D BY D COLQUITT
SAS NO.
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91388 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 105
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/09/94 0730 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA. ESD. REGION IV, ATHENS, GA
SAMPLE DATA LOG
SAMPLE NO. 95191389 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 106
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/09/94 0755 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. O INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91390 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 107
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/09/94 0850 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91391 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 108
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/09/94 0925 SAMPLE CULLbCTION:
RECEIVED FROM B RFRRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
CONFIDENTIAL
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
D BY D COLQUITT SEALED YES
SAS NO.
SAMPLE NO. 95C91392 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE FISH
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 109
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STuRET STATlUN NU CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/07/94 1223 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91393 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE BLKWA
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 200
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/17/94 1340 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'D BY D COLQUITT
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO SAS NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
SEALED YES
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA. ESD, REGION IV. ATHENS, GA
SAMPLE DATA LOG
SAMPLE NO. 95C91394 PROJECT NO. 95-0090
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/15/94
PROGRAM ELcMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE DRYICEBLK
STATION 250
STORET STATION NO CONFIDENTIAL
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO.
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
TESTS: METALS SCAN
1130
SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC'
INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
REMARKS
PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
D BY D COLQUITT
SAS NO.
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91395 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE DRYICEBLK
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 260
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/16/94 1200 SAMPLE COLLECTION:
RECEIVED FROM B BERRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR.
RFMARK^ RFUARK<;
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
CONFIDENTIAL
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
D BY D COLQUITT
SAS NO.
SEALED YES
SAMPLE NO. 95C91396 PROJECT NO. 95-0090 PROGRAM ELEMENT. SSF SAMPLE TYPE DRYICEBLK
SOURCE GE/SHEPHERD FARM STATION 270
CITY E FLATROCK STATE NC STORET STATION NO
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 11/14/94 1430 SAMPLE CULLtCTION:
RECEIVED FROM B BFRRANG SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 11/18/94/1430 REC
LAB CONTRACT CASE NO. 0 INORG SAMPLE NO ORGANIC SAMPLE NO
ORGANIC CONTRACTOR: INORGANIC CONTRACTOR:
PFUARKC PFftlAPk c
TESTS: METALS SCAN PESTICIDES SCAN ORGANIC SCAN
COLLECTED BY B BERRANG
CONFIDENTIAL
STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
D BY D COLQUITT SEALED YES
SAS NO.
-------
rnuj. LLnVtn* P. Pirxnnnq
ACTIVITY:
PROJECT ID: 95-0048
vviir nn i • vu
SPILL 10:
CHAIN—OF—CUSTODY RECORD
SITE NAME: GENERAL ELECTRIC
CITY, STATE: EAST FLAT ROCK/, NC
DATE SHIPPED: / /
AIRBILL:
CARRIER:
SHIPPED TO: US-EPA. REGION IV LABORATORY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OIV
C0LLE6E STATION ROAD
ATHENS. SA 30613-0801
ATTN: Debbie Colquitt
PHONE: 404/546-3111
' AS
AMPLE ID STATION
SSS3SSSSS sssssss:
6E-101-SD
TOXICITY! 1)
fiE-IOHD
TOXICITY! 1)
6E-10H&
TOXICITY! 1)
eE-ioi-sb
TOXICITY! 1)
DESCRIPTION
(1) 4A- 45513
(1) 4A- 45518
(1) 4A- 45523
(1) 4A- 45528
TOXICITY! 1)
GE-IOMD
TOXICITY!1)
K-lOWb
TOXICITY!1)
(1) 4A- 45543
(1) 4A- 45548
(1) 4A- 45553
(1) 4A- 45558
&EPA
United Stotes Environmental Protection Agency
Contract Laboratory Progom Sample Management Office
PO Bo* 818 Alexandria, VA 2231 3
703-557-2490 F7S 557-2490
Sediient
Sediient
Sediient
GE-105-sb
(1) 4A- 45533
TOXICITY! 1)
Sediient
11-08/0740 B. BERRANG
6E-106-5D
Sediient
11-07/1650 B. BERRAN6
(1) 4A- 45538
TOXICITY!1)
Sediient
Sediient
Sediient
11-07/1425 B. BERRAN6
11-07/1126 B. BERftAHG
11-08/1505 B. BERRAH6
NO. H6ij
White - LAB Copy for Return to Saiplers Yellow - LAB Copy Pink - Saipler's Copy Gold - Extra Copy
-------
PRQJ. LEADER: B. BERRftWG
ACTIVITY:
PROJECT 10: 95-0048
COMPANY: 6E
SPILL ID:
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
SITE NAME: 6ENERAL ELECTRIC
CITY, STATE: EAST FLAT ROCK/. NC
&EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Controct Laboratory Progom Sample Management Otfice
PO Bo« 818 Alexandria, VA 22313
703-557-2490 FTS 557-2490
- NO.
White - LAB Copy for Return to Samplers Yellow - LAB Copy Pink - Saipler's Copy Gold - Extri Copy
1164
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESQ, ATHENS, GA.
METALS DATA REPORT
a*********************************************************'
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91385 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 102 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
REPRINTED ON01/04/95
*********
*****************************
********
**********
MG/KG
0.60U
SILVER
2.5U
ARSENIC
NA
BORON
6.5
BARIUM
0.30U
BERYLLIUM
0.30U
CADMIUM
0.60U
COBALT
0.60U
CHROMIUM
1.7
COPPER
0.60U
MOLYBDENUM
1.2U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
1.8U
ANTIMONY
2.4U
SELENIUM
1.5U
TIN
18
STRONTIUM
3.0U
TELLURIUM
1.1
TITANIUM
6.0U
THALLIUM
0.60U
VANADIUM
0.60U
YTTRIUM
34
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.12
MERCURY
30
ALUMINUM
11
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
8000
CALCIUM
330
MAGNESIUM
33
IRON
830
SODIUM
2900
POTASSIUM
•~~REMARKS***
***REMARKS***
•~~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES M-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ~L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** J****************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91386 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
*• SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
** STATION ID: 103 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1645 STOP: 00/00/00 *
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.60U
SILVER
7700
CALCIUM
2.5U
ARSENIC
320
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
41
IRON
7.2
BARIUM
750
SODIUM
0.30U
BERYLLIUM
2800
POTASSIUM
0.30U
CADMIUM
0.60U
COBALT
0.60U
CHROMIUM
0.88
COPPER
0.60U
MOLYBDENUM
1.2U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
1.8U
ANTIMONY
2.4U
SELENIUM
1.5U
TIN
17
STRONTIUM
3.0U
TELLURIUM
1.9
TITANIUM
6.0U
THALLIUM
0.60U
VANADIUM
0.60U
YTTRIUM
39
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.22
MERCURY
46
ALUMINUM
9.9
MANGANESE
•"REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE #NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-HATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
REPRINTED ON01/04/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91387 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 104
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1710 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.60U
SILVER
7700
CALCIUM
2.5U
ARSENIC
320
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
56
IRON
7.8
BARIUM
790
SODIUM
0.30U
BERYLLIUM
2700
POTASSIUM
0.30U
CADMIUM
0.60U
COBALT
0.60U
CHROMIUM
0.91
COPPER
0.60U
MOLYBDENUM
1.2U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
1.8U
ANTIMONY
2.4U
SELENIUM
1.5U
TIN
16
STRONTIUM
3.0U
TELLURIUM
2.5
TITANIUM
6.Oil
THALLIUM
0.60U
VANADIUM
0.60U
YTTRIUM
39
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.20
MERCURY
66
ALUMINUM
9.1
MANGANESE
"•REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
"•FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
TALS DATA REPORT
****************************#*****#*****************************<
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91388 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BT: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: C FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 105 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
0.60U
3.0U
NA
9.0
0.30U
0.30U
0.60U
0.60U
0.95
0.60U
1.211
0.10U
1.8U
2.4U
1.5U
18
3.0U
1.5
6.0U
0.60U
0.60U
39
NA
0.13
41
5.8
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
SILVER
7900
CALCIUM
ARSENIC
320
MAGNESIUM
BORON
41
IRON
BARIUM
820
SODIUM
BERYLLIUM
2700
POTASSIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
"•REMARKS*"
"•REMARKS*"
"•FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATER1AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** ****************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91389 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: MC *
** STATION ID: 106 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0755 STOP: 00/00/00 *
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.60U
SILVER
8300
CALCIUM
1.8U
ARSENIC
330
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
33
IRON
8.3
BARIUM
810
SODIUM
0.30U
BERYLLIUM
2700
POTASSIUM
0.30U
CADMIUM
0.60U
COBALT
0.60U
CHROMIUM
1.2
COPPER
0.60U
MOLYBDENUM
1.2U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
1.8U
ANTIMONY
2.4U
SELENIUM
1.5U
TIN
17
STRONTIUM
3.0U
TELLURIUM
1.2
TITANIUM
6.0U
THALLIUM
0.60U
VANADIUM
0.60U
YTTRIUM
42
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.09
MERCURY
36
ALUMINUM
5.3
MANGANESE
"•REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
••~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATEO VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
***************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91390 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 107 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0850 STOP: 00/0C/00
MG/KG
1.0U
SILVER
3.0U
ARSENIC
NA
BORON
3.5
BARIUM
0.50U
BERYLLIUM
0.50U
CADMIUM
1.0U
COBALT
1.0U
CHROMIUM
1.0U
COPPER
1.0U
MOLYBDENUM
2.0U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
3.0U
ANTIMONY
4.0U
SELENIUM
2.5U
TIN
19
STRONTIUM
5.0U
TELLURIUM
1.3
TITANIUM
10U
THALLIUM
1.0U
VANADIUM
1.0U
YTTRIUM
26
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.06
MERCURY
63
ALUMINUM
6.5
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
12000 CALCIUM
400 MAGNESIUM
36 IRON
1000 SODIUM
2900 POTASSIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•~~REMARKS***
••~REMARKS***
~••FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE "NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-HATER1AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*• PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91391 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
*• SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
** STATION ID: 108 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0925 STOP: 00/00/00 *
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
0.80U
SILVER
9300
CALCIUM
2.4U
ARSENIC
360
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
110
IRON
8.6
BARIUM
960
SODIUM
0.40U
BERYLLIUM
2800
POTASSIUM
0.40U
CADMIUM
0.80U
COBALT
0.80U
CHROMIUM
0.86
COPPER
0.80U
MOLYBDENUM
1.6U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
2.4U
ANTIMONY
3.2U
SELENIUM
2.0U
TIN
18
STRONTIUM
4.0U
TELLURIUM
4.4
TITANIUM
8.0U
THALLIUM
0.80U
VANADIUM
o.aou
YTTRIUM
44
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.05
MERCURY
160
ALUMINUM
14
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•~•REMARKS***
"•REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI - INTERFERENCES M-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-HATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
REPRINTED ON01/04/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91392 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 109-
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1223 STOP: 00/00/00
a***************************************************************
MG/KG
0.60U
SILVER
3.0U
ARSENIC
NA
BORON
6.6
BARIUM
0.30U
BERYLLIUM
0.30U
CADMIUM
0.60U
COBALT
0.60U
CHROMIUM
0.95
COPPER
0.60U
MOLYBDENUM
1.2U
NICKEL
0.10U
LEAD
1.8U
ANTIMONY
2.4U
SELENIUM
1.5U
TIN
15
STRONTIUM
3.0U
TELLURIUM
4.1
TITANIUM
6.0U
THALLIUM
0.60U
VANADIUM
0.60V
YTTRIUM
31
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.07
MERCURY
200
ALUMINUM
16
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
8700
CALCIUM
340
MAGNESIUM
110
IRON
930
SODIUM
2800
POTASSIUM
"•REMARKS***
***RENARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
- - - ********************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91385
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 102
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
01/13/95
* * * *
MG/KG
0.05 Oil
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.050U
0.20U
0.30U
0.30U
0.30U
**********
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
>******
SAMPLE TYPE:
*****
*******
******************
*********
FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CIlY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
* * * *
******
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
DELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN 11 (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
/1
0.068U
0.050U
*******
******
MG/ICG
0.30U
0.32J
0.30U
0.030
3.0U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PCB-123Z (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
n
***REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
***REMARKS***
•~•FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL UAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91386 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 103 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1645 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
0.050U
ALDRIN
0.45U
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR
0.49
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.45U
0.050U
ALPHA-BHC
0.45U
0.050U
BETA-BHC
3.0U
0.050U
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.050U
DELTA-BHC
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.050U
DIELDRIN
0.050U
4,4'-ODT (P,P'-DDT)
0.050U
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
0.050U
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
0.050U
ENDRIN
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.062U
0.20U
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
0.050U
0.45U
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
0.45U
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
0.45U
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCHLOROANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIOE)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
a
•~•REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
***REMARKS***
~~•FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLOROANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
-* **************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91387 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 104 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1710 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.050U ALDRIN
0.050U HEPTACHLOR
0.050U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.050U AlPHA-BHC
0.050U BETA-BHC
0.050U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.050U DELTA-BHC
0.050U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.050U DIELDRIN
0.050U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
0.051U 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
0.050U 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
0.050U ENDRIN
0.050U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.050U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.20U CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
0.45U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
0.45U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
0.45U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
/1
0.45U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.49 PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
0.45U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
0.45U PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
3.0U TOXAPHENE
-- CHLORDENE /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
-- BETA CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
-- TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
-- CIS-NONACHLOR /2
-- OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE)
0.058U METHOXYCHLOR
0.050U ENDRIN KETONE
/2
•••REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
•••REMARKS***
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPT1VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
~~ **************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91388 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 105 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.084U ALDRIN
0.050U HEPTACHLOR
0.099U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.050U ALPHA-BHC
0.050U BETA-BHC
0.050U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.050U DELTA-BHC
0.050U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.050U DIELDRIN
0.061U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
0.18 4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
0.050U 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
0.050U ENDRIN
0.073U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.060U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
O.ZOU CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
1.5U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.5U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1.5U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
/I
1.5U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
1.6 PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
1.5U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
1.5U PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
3.0U TOXAPHENE
- - CHLORDENE /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
-- BETA CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
-- TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
-- CIS-NONACHLOR /2
-- OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE)
0.21U METHOXYCHLOR
0.061U ENDRIN KETONE
/2
***REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
•REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG10N IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
*** ***************************************************************
" PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91389 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
** STATION ID: 106 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0755 STOP: 00/00/00
**
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.090U
ALDRIN
1.0U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR
1232)
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR
1.4C
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR
1248)
0.090U
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
1,0U
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR
1260)
0.050U
ALPHA-BHC
1 .OU
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
1016)
0.050U
BETA-BHC
3.0U
TOXAPHENE
0.050U
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DELTA-BHC
ALPHA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
BETA CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DIELDRIN
GAMMA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.064U
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.12
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
TRANS-NONACHLOR
/2
0.051U
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.051U
ENDRIN
CIS-NONACHLOR
/2
0.051U
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2
0.064U
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.20U
METHOXYCHLOR
0.20U
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
0.064U
ENDRIN KETONE
1.0U
PCS-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.0U
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1.0U
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
"•REMARKS*" "'REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
MATERIAL
BY GC/MS
"~FOOTNOTES"*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. -. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
EPA-REGION IV
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
*** *******************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91390 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 107
ESd""/U HENsj GaT"" 01/13/95
******************************* ***
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG **
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC **
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0850 STOP: 00/00/00 **
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.082U
ALDRIN
1.0U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR
1232)
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR
1.4C
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR
1248)
0.076U
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
1.0U
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR
1260)
0.050U
ALPHA-BHC
1.0U
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
1016)
0.050U
BETA-BHC
3.0U
TOXAPHENE
0.050U
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DELTA-BHC
ALPHA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
BETA CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DIELDRIN
GAMMA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.072U
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.061
4,4'-DDE (P.P'DDE)
TRANS-NONACHLOR
/2
0.058U
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.058U
ENDRIN
CIS-NONACHLOR
/ 2
0.058U
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2
0.072U
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.20U
METHOXYCHLOR
0.20U
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
0.072U
ENDRIN KETONE
1.0U
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.0U
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1.0U
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
MATERIAL
BY GC/MS
"~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
"''A***************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91391 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ElEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 108 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.11U
ALDRIN
1.5U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR
1232)
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR
1.9C
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR
1248)
0.088U
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
1.5U
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR
1260)
0.050U
ALPHA-BHC
1.5U
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
1016)
0.050U
BETA-BHC
3.0U
TOXAPHENE
0.050U
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DELTA-BHC
ALPHA-CHLORDENE
12
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
BETA CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DIELDRIN
GAMMA-CHLORDENE
a
0.072U
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
12
0.093
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
TRANS-NONACHLOR
12
0.057U
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
12
0.057U
ENDRIN
CISNONACHLOR
12
0.057U
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2
0.072U
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.20U
METHOXYCHLOR
0.20U
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
0.072U
ENDRIN KETONE
1.5U
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.5U
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1.5U
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•"REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
MATERIAL
BY GC/MS
•"FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-HATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
"*********************************»*****************~****»*******
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91392 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 109 COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1223 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.15U
ALDRIN
2.5U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR
1232)
0.050U
HEPTACHLOR
2.8C
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR
1248)
0.12U
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
2.5U
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR
1260)
0.050U
ALPHA-BHC
2.5U
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR
1016)
0.050U
BETA-BHC
3.1U
TOXAPHENE
0.050U
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DELTA-BHC
ALPHA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.050U
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
BETA CHLORDENE /2
0.050U
DIELORIN
GAMMA-CHLORDENE
/2
0.076U
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.19
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
TRANS-NONACHLOR
/2
0.061U
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
/2
0.061U
ENDRIN
CIS-NONACHLOR
/2
0.061U
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2
0.076U
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.21U
METHOXYCHLOR
0.20U
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
0.076U
ENDRIN KETONE
2.5U
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
2.5U
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
2.5U
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS***
AR1248 INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM 1254-CALCULATED AS AR1248.
"•REMARKS*
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/12/94
EXTRACTABLF ORGAN ICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 913&4 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 101 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1615 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.2U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2.2U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2.2U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
2.2U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2.2U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.2U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.2U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2.2U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4.4U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2.2U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2.2U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
2.2U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2.2U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
4.4U 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
2.2U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2.2U 2-METHYLPHENOL
2.2U 2-NITROANILINE
2.2U 2-NITROPHENOL
2.2U 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
2.2U 3-NITROANILINE
2.2U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
2.2U 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2.2U 4-CHLOROANILINE
2.2U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
2.2U 4-MTROANlltNE
4.4U 4-NITROPHENOL
2.2U ACENAPHTHENE Hfr a
2.2U ACENAPHTHYLEN^ - .
2.2U ANTHRACENE
2.2U BENZ0(A)ANTHRACENE0'O°oq 33
2.2U BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE o.coMi"
2.2U BENZOCGHI)PERYLENE -
2.2U S-.rlZO-A-PYRENE O,oooqz3.
2.2U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
2.2U BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2.2U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2.2U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
2.2U CARBAZOLE
2.2U CHRYSENE
2.2U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
2.2U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
2.2U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
2.2U DIBENZOFURAN
2.2U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.2U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2.2U FLUORANTHENE
2.2U FLUORENE
2.2U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
2.2U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2.2U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2.2U HEXACHLOROETHANE
2.2U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
2.2U ISOPHORONE
2.2U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
2.2U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
2.2U NAPHTHALENE
2.2U NITROBENZENE
4.4U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
2.2U PHENANTHRENE
2.2U PHENOL
2.2U PYRENE
•"REMARKS***
"•REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINI HUH QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/12/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** ******************/***********
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91384 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 101
a********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
nty¦ f piATDnrv ct- wr
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1615 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
9JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
30JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN HEXADECENOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
40JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
60JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
100JN EICOSATETRAENOIC ACID, METHYL ESTER
30JN EICOSATRIENOIC ACID
30JN EICOSADIENOIC ACID, METHYL ESTER
--- HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)-
20JN ETHYL ESTER
80J 5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
N PETROLEUM PROOUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTJMATED VALUE *N-PRESUNPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*tC-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN «L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
T0T02SDISK:[EPADZC]PRODHEXT.LST;1
-------
EXTRACTaBLE organics data report
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
* * * *
*************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 913& SAMPLE TYPE:
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 102
*
FISH
***************
*********
********
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
**********
**************
***************
************
* * * * *
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.4U
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL
1,4U
BENZOCGHI)PERYLENE
1.4U
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.4U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.4U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1. 4U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.4U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.4U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1,4U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1,4U
B1S(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.4U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
CARBAZOLE
1.4U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1.4U
CHRYSENE
2.7U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.4U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4U
DI-NOCTYLPHTHALATE
1.4U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4U
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1,4U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.4U
DIBENZOFURAN
1.4U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.7U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.4U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.4U
FLUORANTHENE
1.4U
2-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U
FLUORENE
1.4U
2-NITROANILINE
1.4U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.4U
2-NITROPHENOL
1.4U
HEXACHLOROBUT AD IENE
1,4U
3,3' -DICHLOROBENZID1NE
1.4U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.4U
3-NITROANILINE
1,4U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.4U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U
INDENO (1,2,3 - CD) PYRENE
1.4U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U
ISOPHORONE
1.4U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1.4U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.4U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1.4U
4-N1TROAMILINE
1.4U
NAPHTHALENE
2.7U
4-NITROPHENOL
1-4U
NITROBENZENE
1.4U
ACENAPHTHENE
2.7U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.4U
PHENANTHRENE
1.4U
ANTHRACENE
1.4U
PHENOL
1.4U
BENZOCA)ANTHRACENE
1.4U
PYRENE
1.4U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•"REMARKS***
***REMARKS**
"•FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** *******************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91385 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 102
********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
4JN
DODECANOIC ACID
10JN
TETRADECANOIC ACID
7JN
PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
90JN
HEXADECENOIC ACID
200JN
HEXADECANOIC ACID
7JN
HEPTADECENOIC ACID
10JN
HEPATADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
50JN
OCTADECANOIC ACID
2JN
EICOSATRIENOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)
6JN
ETHYL ESTER
N
PETROLEUM PROOUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND HAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA. 12/13/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************** ***
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 913&S SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG **
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC **
** STATION ID: 103 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1645 STOP: 00/00/00 **
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2U
(3-AND/OR 4- )METHYLPHENOL
1.2U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.2U
1,2,4 -TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.2U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.2U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.2U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.2U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.2U
2,4,5 -TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL> ETHER
1.2U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.2U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
CARBAZOLE
1.2U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1.2U
CHRYSENE
2.5U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.2U
DI -N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.2U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.2U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.2U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.2U
D1BENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.2U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.2U
DiBENZOFURAN
1.2U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.5U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITR0PHEN0L
1.2U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.2U
FLUORANTHENE
1.2U
2-METHYLPHEN0L
1.2U
FLUORENE
1.2U
2-NITROANILINE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.2U
2-NITROPHENOL
1.2U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.2U
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZ1DINE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.2U
3-NITROANIL INE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.2U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.2U
INDENO (1,2,3- CD) PYRENE
1.2U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.2U
1SOPHORONE
1.2U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1.2U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.2U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.2U
N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1.2U
4-NITROANILINE
1.2U
NAPHTHALENE
2.5U
4-NITROPHENOL
1.2U
NITROBENZENE
1.2U
ACENAPHTHENE
2.5U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.2U
PHENANTHRENE
1.2U
ANTHRACENE
1.2U
PHENOL
1.2U
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.2 U
PYRENE
1.2U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
~"REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** ******************«f************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91386 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 103
********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1645 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
3JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
7JN DODECANOIC ACID
20JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
60JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
100JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
200JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
5JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
9JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
400JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
40JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
3JN EICOSATRIENOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)
30JN ETHYL ESTER
20JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PROOUCT
"~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES M-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
'K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR HAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA. 12/13/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************** ***
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 913&7 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG **
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARH CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC **
** STATION ID: 104 COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1710 STOP: 00/00/00 **
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.1U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.1U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.1U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.1U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.1U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.1U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.1U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.1U 2,4-DlMETHYLPHENOL
2.3U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.1U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.1U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.1U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.1U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
2.3U 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
1.1U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.1U 2-METHYLPHENOL
1.1U 2-NITROANILINE
1.1U 2-N1TROPHENOL
1.1U 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
1.1U 3-NITROANILINE
1.1U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.1U 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.1U 4-CHLOROANILINE
I.1U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
J.IU 4-MTROANILINE
2.3U 4-NITROPHENOL
1.1U ACENAPHTHENE
1.1U ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.1U ANTHRACENE
1.1U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.1U BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
1.1U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.10 BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.1U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.1U BlS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.1U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1.1U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.1U CARBAZOLE
1.1U CHRYSENE
1.1U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.1U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.1U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.1U DIBENZOFURAN
1.1U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1.1U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.1U FLUORANTHENE
1.1U FLUORENE
1.1U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.1U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.1U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.1U HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.1U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
1.1U ISOPHORONE
1.1U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.1U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1.1U NAPHTHALENE
1.1U NITROBENZENE
2.3U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.1U PHENANTHRENE
1.1U PHENOL
1.1U PYRENE
~REMARKS***
'REMARKS*
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** A*******************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91387 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 104
********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1710 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
10JN DODECANOIC ACID
30JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
10JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
100JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
200JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
10JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
20JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
600JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
80JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
9JN EICOSATRIENOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)
20JN ETHYL ESTER
10JN EICOSADIENOIC ACID, METHYL ESTER
50JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAl- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *l-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATER]AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND HAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
*******
****************
****************
* * * *
* * * *
~ * * * *
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91388 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 105
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
***************
************************************************
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.2U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.21)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.2U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.2U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.2U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.2U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.2U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
1.2U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.2U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
CARBAZOLE
1.2U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1.2U
CHRYSENE
2.4U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.2U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.2U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.2U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.2U
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.2U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.2U
DIBENZOFURAN
1.2U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.4U
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
1.2U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.2U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.2U
FLUORANTHENE
1.2U
2-METHYLPHENOL
1.2U
FLUORENE
1.2U
2-NITROANILINE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.2U
2-NITROPHENOL
1.2U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.2U
3,3'-DICHLOROBEN2IDINE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.2U
3-NITROANILINE
1.2U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.2U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.2U
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
1.2U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.2U
ISOPHORONE
1.2U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1.2U
N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.2U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.2U
N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DI PHENYLAMINE
1.2U
4-NITROANILINE
1.2U
NAPHTHALENE
2.4U
4-NITROPHENOL
1.2U
NITROBENZENE
1.2U
ACENAPHTHENE
2.4U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.2U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.2U
PHENANTHRENE
1.2U
ANTHRACENE
1.2U
PHENOL
1.2U
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.2U
PYRENE
1.2U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
***REMARKS*«
***REMARKS***
""FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** *******************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91388 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 105
********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
4JN PYR1DINECARBOXAMIDE
7JN DODECANOIC ACID
20JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
10JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
100JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
200JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
8JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
9JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
400JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
40JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYPROPYL)
20JN ETHYL ESTER
20JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, D1HYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
U PETROLEUM PROOUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/14/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************** ***
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 9138^ SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG **
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC **
** STATION ID: 106 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0755 STOP: 00/00/00 **
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.3U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.3U
BENZOCGHI)PERYLENE
1.3U
1,2,4 -TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.3U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.3U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.3UJ
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.3U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.3U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.3U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.3U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1.3U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.3UJ
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.3U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.3U
CARBAZOLE
1.3U
2,4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
1.3UJ
CHRYSENE
2.5U
2,4-DIMITROPHENOL
1.3U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.3U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.3UJ
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.3U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.3U
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.3U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.3U
DIBENZOFURAN
1.3U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.3U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.5U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
1.3U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.3U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.3UJ
FLUORANTHENE
1.3U
2-METHYLPHENOL
1.3U
FLUORENE
1.3U
2-NITROANILINE
1.3U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.3U
2-N1TROPHENOL
1.3U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.3UJ
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
1.3U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.3U
3-NITROAN1LINE
1.3U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.3U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.3U
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
1.3U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.3U
ISOPHORONE
1.3U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1.3U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.3U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.3U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
J.3U
4-NITROANIL1NE
1.3U
NAPHTHALENE
2.5U
4-NITROPHENOL
1.3U
NITROBENZENE
1.3U
ACENAPHTHENE
2.5U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.3U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.3U
PHENANTHRENE
1.3U
ANTHRACENE
1.3U
PHENOL
1. 3UJ
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.3UJ
PYRENE
1.3U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-N0T ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
T0T02$DISK:[EPADZC]PROOHMET.LST;1
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/14/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
A*****-***#********************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91389 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 106
a********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0755 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2JN DODECANOIC ACID
10JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
5JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
40JN HEKADECENOIC ACID
80JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
5JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
5JN HEPTADECAN01C ACID (2 ISOMERS)
100JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
20JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYPROPYL)
5JN ETHYL ESTER
5JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
~~~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO SE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
T0T02SDI SIC: [EPADZC] PROOHEXT. LST; 1
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/13/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** A**************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91390 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
** STATION ID: 107 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0850 STOP: 00/00/00
**
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.4U (3-AND/0R 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.4U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.4U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.4U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.4U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1-4U 2,4,6-TRlCHLOROPHENOL
1.4U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.4U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2.9U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.4U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
2.9U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.4U 2-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U 2-N1TROANILINE
1.4U 2-NITROPHENOL
1.4UJ 3,3'-DICHLQROBENZIDINE
1.4U 3-NITROANILINE
1.4U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U 4-CHLOROANILINE
1.4U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U 4-NITROANILINE
2.9U 4-NITROPHENOL
1.4U ACENAPHTHENE
1.4U ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.4U ANTHRACENE
1.4UJ BEN20(A)ANTHRACENE
1.4U BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
1.4U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.4U BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.4UJ BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.4U BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.4U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1.4UJ BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.4U CARBAZOLE
1.4UJ CHRYSENE
1.4U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.4UJ DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.4U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.4U DIBENZOFURAN
1.4U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
1.4U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.4UJ FLUORANTHENE
1.4U FLUORENE
1.4U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.4U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.4U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.4U HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.4U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
1.4U ISOPHORONE
1.4U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.4U N-NITROSODI PHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1.4U NAPHTHALENE
1.4U NITROBENZENE
2.9U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.4U PHENANTHRENE
1.4U PHENOL
1.4UJ PYRENE
'REMARKS***
***REMARKS***
"~FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES ~J-ESTIMATED VALUE ~N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ~L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** ******************t***********
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91390 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 107
*********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0850 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2JN PYRID1NECARBOXAMIDE
3JN DODECANOIC ACID
10JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
8JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
50JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
90JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
6JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
5JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
20JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)
20JN ETHYL ESTER
7JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
~"FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN 'L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/13/94
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** ************************************************************** ***
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91^91 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG **
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC **
** STATION ID: 108 COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0925 STOP: 00/00/00 **
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.4U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.4U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.4U
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1. 4U
BENZO-APYRENE
1.4U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.4UJ
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.4U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.4U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1.4U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.4UJ
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1.4U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
CARBAZOLE
1. 4U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1. 4UJ
CHRYSENE
2.9U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.4U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4UJ
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1,4U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.4U
DIBENZOCA,H)ANTHRACENE
1.4U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.4U
DIBENZOFURAN
1.4U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.4U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
2.9U
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
1.4U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.4U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.4UJ
FLUORANTHENE
1.4U
2-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U
FLUORENE
1.4U
2-NITROANILINE
1,4U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.4U
2-NITROPHENOL
1.4U
HEXACHLOROBUT AD IENE
1.4UJ
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
1.4U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.4U
3-NITROANILINE
1.4U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1,4U
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U
INDENO (1,2,3 - CD) PYRENE
1. 4U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.4U
ISOPHORONE
1.4U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1,4U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.4U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.4U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DI PHENYLAMINE
1.4U
4-NITROANILINE
1.4U
NAPHTHALENE
2.9U
4-NITROPHENOL
1.4U
NITROBENZENE
1.4U
ACENAPHTHENE
2.9U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1. 4U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.4U
PHENANTHRENE
1,4U
ANTHRACENE
1.4U
PHENOL
1.4UJ
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.4UJ
PYRENE
1.4U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTA8LE COMPCXJNDS - OATA REPORT
*** **************** *'* ************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91391 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 108
*********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/09/94 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
3JN DODECANOIC ACID
20JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
7JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
100JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
10JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
7JN HETPADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
40JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYPROPYL)
20JN ETHYL ESTER
30JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PROOUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE "NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------
EXTRAC7ABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 913^2
SOURCE: GE/SKEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 109
SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1223 STOP: 00/00/00
********
*****
************
**********
*****
******
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.5U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1.5U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
1.5U
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1.5U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
1.5U
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1.5UJ
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
1.5U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
1.5U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1.5U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.5U
BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1.5U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.5UJ
BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
1,5U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.5UJ
CARBAZOLE
1.5U
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1.5UJ
CHRYSENE
3.1U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
1.5UJ
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
1.5U
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
1.5UJ
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
1.5U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1.5U
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
1.5U
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
1.5U
DIBENZOFURAN
1.5U
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1.5U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
3.1UJ
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
1.5U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1.5U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1.5UJ
FLUORANTHENE
1.5U
2-METHYLPHENOL
1.5U
FLUORENE
1.5U
2-NITROANILINE
1.5UJ
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
1.5U
2-NITROPHENOL
1.5U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1.5UJ
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
1.5U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1.5U
3-NITROANILINE
1.5U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
1.5UJ
4-BROHOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.5U
INDENO (1,2,3 - CD ) PYRENE
1.5U
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
1.5U
ISOPHORONE
1.5U
4-CHLOROANILINE
1.5U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1.5U
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
1.5UJ
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1.5U
4-NITROANILINE
1.5U
NAPHTHALENE
3.1U
4-NITROPHENOL
1.5U
NITROBENZENE
1.5U
ACENAPHTHENE
3.1UJ
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1.5U
ACENAPHTHYLENE
1.5UJ
PHENANTHRENE
1. 5UJ
ANTHRACENE
1.5U
PHENOL
1.5UJ
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
1.5UJ
PYRENE
1.5U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•REMARKS***
***REMARKS**
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE
*NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
T0T02SDISK:[EPADZC]PROOHMET.LST;1
T0T02$DISK:IEPADZC]PROOHPCB.LST;1
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG10N IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
12/13/94
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS - DATA REPORT
*** ***************** *'* ***********
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91392 SAMPLE TYPE: FISH
" SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
** STATION ID: 109
*********************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1223 STOP: 00/00/00
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2JN PYRIDINECARBOXAMIDE
4JN DOOECANOIC ACID
20JN TETRADECANOIC ACID
8JN PENTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN HEXADECENOIC ACID
100JN HEXADECANOIC ACID
6JN HEPTADECENOIC ACID
10JN HEPTADECANOIC ACID (2 ISOMERS)
200JN OCTADECENOIC ACID, HEXYL ESTER
30JN OCTADECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID, HYDROXY(HYDROXYMETHYL)
40JN ETHYL ESTER
4JN OCTADECANOIC ACID, DIHYDROXYPROPYL ESTER
N PETROLEUM PROOUCT
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
TOT02$DISK:[EPADZCJ PRODHEX T.L ST;1
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
«• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91270 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG *•
*» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC *»
«• STATION
**
ID: 101-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1345 STOP: 00/00/00 »»
**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
**»FOOTNOTES*»«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS,MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91271 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG «»
»« SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC »»
** STATION
• •
ID: 102-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1110 STOP: 00/00/00 »»
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
»»*F00TN0TES»»*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91272 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
«» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC »«
** STATION
• *
ID: 103-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1030 STOP: 00/00/00 «*
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.8 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
**'FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•* PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91273 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
** SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC «»
«* STATION
• *
ID: 104-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
0900 STOP: 00/00/00 *«
**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
3.1 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
* "FOOTNOTES'**
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91274 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG *«
»» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC «»
•• STATION
*•
ID: 105-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
0740 STOP: 00/00/00 »«
**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
»*»FOOTNOTES**»
«A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91275 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG *•
»» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC *•
»» STATION
• •
ID: 106-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94
1650 STOP: 00/00/00 «•
**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
»*»FOOTNOTES**«
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
11/30/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91276 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 107-SW COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1550 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
10A MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
*»*FOOTNOTES«*»
• A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J—ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
11/30/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91277 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 108-SW COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1425 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
8.8 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
*«»FOOTNOTES**»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•• PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91278 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG *•
•» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC «»
»• STATION
*•
ID: 109-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94
1128 STOP: 00/00/00 *»
• *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
2.8 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
* * * FOOTNOTES* » *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91279 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG •*
«• SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC »•
** STATION
• •
ID: 110-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1505 STOP: 00/00/00 »«
**
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
3.9 MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
* * » FOOTNOTES* » *
»A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L~ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/30/94
SPECIFJFD ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91281 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
9!/St£EHl£D FARM CITY: E FLAT R0C ST: NC
STATION ID: 205-SW COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 0740 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
1.0U MG/L TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
»*'FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
11/21/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91270 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 101-SW COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1345 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.0U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.0U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOME THANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1.1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
«*»FOOTNOTES»«»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE «NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Tmf NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT ITAT ICM LImlT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
11/21/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91271 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 102-SW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1110 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE( 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1.2-DICHL0R0ETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
5.0U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1.1 —DICHLOROPROPENE
5 OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
2.7 J TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5. OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
S.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.0U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5. OU 1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
*«»FOOTNOTES«*»
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Twf wi.imre" IS THE MINIMI'S/! QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/21/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
»* PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91272 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
•» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC »•
** STATION
* *
ID: 103-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1030 STOP: 00/00/00 »»
• *
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.0U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.0U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5. OU TRICHLOROETHENE( TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5 OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5. OU TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROE THANE
5.OU TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
5.OU CHLOROBEN2ENE
5.OU 1,1.1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.0U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.0U STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2.3-TR1CHLOROPROPANE
5.0U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
» * * FOOTNOTES*•*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~ U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMRE" IS THE WIMIM'JM Q'JiMT ITAT ION' LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/23/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91273 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
»• SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC •*
** STATION
**
ID: 104-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
0900 STOP: 00/00/00 »»
* *
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1.2-DICHL0R0ETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5 OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.0U STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
t>. OU 1,2, 3-TRI CHLOROPROP ANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
« » * FOOTNOTES* * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT I TilTOW LIMI"
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
11/21/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91274 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 105-SW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 0740 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.0U 1.2-DTCHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE ( TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
0.70J TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
5.OU 1,1.2-TRICHLOROE THANE
0. 93J TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BEN2ENE
5.0U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5. OU O-XYLENE
5. OU STYRENE
5.0U BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.0U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
«*"FOOTNOTES*»»
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Tue IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/21/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91275 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE- GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 106-SW COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE( 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.0U TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROE T HANE
5.OU CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROFORM
5. OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.0U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5. OU TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
3.4J TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5. OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHL0R0BEN2ENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5. OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
*»'FOOTNOTES***
• A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED The WMRP" IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
11/21/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91276 SAMPLE TYPE:
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 107-SW
SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1550 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1OU CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.OU BROMOMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROETHANE
5.OU TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.0U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5 OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-D T CHL OROE THANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOME THANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROE THANE
1.8J TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROME THANE
5.OU CHL0R08EN2ENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHL0R0ETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.0U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5. OU 1,2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
**'FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMRE" IS TUE VINIM'JK O'JAfJT ITiTION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 11/21/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
»* PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91277 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
«« SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC •*
*» STATION
* *
ID: 108-SW
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94
1425 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.OU TR ICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5 OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.0U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
5.0U BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5. OU TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROE THANE
1.OJ TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5. OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.0U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.0U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5. OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
»»«FOOTNOTES»»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES «J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETE<~.TFp thf MUMRE" !S THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION! LIMIT
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
11/21/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91278 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 109-SW COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1128 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
SOU ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
S.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DICHL OROE THANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5. OU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROE THANE
1.7J TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU CM- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
* » * FOOTNOTES* » *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NliM?" IS TUE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 11/22/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91279 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: IIO-SW COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1505 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.0U 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5. OU TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
5. OU CtS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 2.2-DICHLOROPROP ANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.0U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5. OU 1 , 2-DTC.HLOROETHANE
5. OU BENZENE
5. OU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5. OU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5. OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHL0R0BEN2ENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.0U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
» "FOOTNOTES* »*
»A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED The NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 11/22/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91280 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM. SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 111-SW COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1700 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
5.OU VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROETHANE
5.OU TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5. OU 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5. OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1 „2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0U 2,2-DtCHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5.OU 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
5. OU 1,1 -DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5.OU 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENE( TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.0U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
5.OU 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.OU TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHL0R0BEN2ENE
5.OU 1,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.OU (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5 OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5. OU 1 ,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b.OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1,3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Twf wiimrfp tc the MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 11/22/94
PURGEA8LE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91281 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 205-SW COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 0740 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROME THANE
5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE
5.0U BROMOMETHANE
5. OU CHLOROETHANE
5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5.OU 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U ACETONE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE
5.OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
5.OU TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5. OU 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
5.OU CIS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.OU 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.OU BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROFORM
5. OU 1.1.1 -TRICHLOROE THANE
5.OU 1 ,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
5. OU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
5. OU 1 , 2-DT C.HL OROE THANE
5.OU BENZENE
5.OU TRICHLOROETHENEC TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU DIBROMOMETHANE
5.OU BROMODICHLOROME THANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
5.OU TOLUENE
5.OU TRANS-1.3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
5.OU 1,1,2-TRICHL0R0ETHANE
0.96J TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.OU 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.OU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.OU CHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.OU ETHYL BENZENE
5.0V (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
5.OU O-XYLENE
5.OU STYRENE
5.OU BROMOFORM
5.OU BROMOBENZENE
5.OU 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
b. OU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
5.OU O-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU P-CHLOROTOLUENE
5.OU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.OU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
* * » FOOTNOTES* * *
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~ U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZEO FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBEP IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
12/01/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91282 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 101-SD COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1345 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
62U CHLOROMETHANE
62U VINYL CHLORIDE
62U BROMOMETHANE
62U CHLOROETHANE
62U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
62U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
620U ACETONE
160U CARBON DISULFIDE
62U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
62U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
62U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
62U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
62U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
620U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
62U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
62U CHLOROFORM
62U 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
62U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
62U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
62U 1 .2-nir.HLOROETHANE
62U BENZENE
62U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
62U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
62U DIBROMOMETHANE
62U BROMODICHLOROME THANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
62U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
160U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
100 TOLUENE
62U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
62U 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
62U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
62U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
160U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
62U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
62U CHLOROBENZENE
62U 1.1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
62U ETHYL BENZENE
62U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
62U O-XYLENE
62U STYRENE
62U BROMOFORM
62U BROMOBENZENE
62U 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
62U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
62U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
62U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
62U 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
62U 1 .4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
62U 1.2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
»*»REMARKS»»* »»*REMARKS»»»
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
»»"FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~ U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETEfTFn ThF mi.imrfp IS THE VI MI MUM O'JANTITATICK LIMP
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
12/01/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91283 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 102-SD COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1110 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
42U CHLOROMETHANE
42U VINYL CHLORIDE
42U BROMOMETHANE
42U CHLOROETHANE
42U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
42U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE( 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
420U ACETONE
100U CARBON DISULFIDE
42U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
42U TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE
42U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
42U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
42U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
420U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
42U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
42U CHLOROFORM
42U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
42U 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
42U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
42U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
42U BENZENE
42U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
42U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
42U DIBROMOMETHANE
42U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
42U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
100U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
42U TOLUENE
42U TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
42U 1,1,?-TRICHLOROETHANE
42U TETRACHLOROETHENEC TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
42U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
100U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
42U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
42U CHLOROBENZENE
42U 1,1.1,2-TETRACHL0R0ETHANE
42U ETHYL BENZENE
42U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
42U O-XYLENE
42U STYRENE
42U BROMOFORM
42U BROMOBENZENE
42U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHL0R0ETHANE
42U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
42U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
42U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
42U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
42U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
42U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*»'REMARKS*»* ***REMARKS*»*
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
~ "FOOTNOTES* * »
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETEfTFn thf wiimrfp is THE VIMIM'JM CL'A.'.'TITATICW LJWI'
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
»» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91284 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
»» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC *•
** STATION
• *
ID: 103-SD
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1030 STOP: 00/00/00 *»
* *
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
50U CHLOROMETHANE
50U VINYL CHLORIDE
50U BROMOMETHANE
50U CHLOROETHANE
50U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
50U 1.1-DICHLOROE THENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLfcNE)
500U ACETONE
120U CARBON DISULFIDE
50U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
50U TRANS-1,2-DICHL0R0ETHENE
50U 1,1-DICHLOROE THANE
50U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
50U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
500U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
50U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
50U CHLOROFORM
50U 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
50U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
50U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
50U 1.2-DTCHLOROETHANE
50U BENZENE
50U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
50U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
50U DIBROMOMETHANE
50U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
50U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
120U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
50U TOLUENE
50U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
50U 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
50U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
50U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
120U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
50U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
50U CHLOROBENZENE
50U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
50U ETHYL BENZENE
50U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
bOU O-XYLENE
50U STYRENE
50U BROMOFORM
50U BROMOBENZENE
SOU 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
bOU 1 ,2.3-TR1CHLOROPROPANE
50U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
50U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
50U 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
50U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
50U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*»*REMARKS»*» »«»REMARKS»*»
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
»*'FOOTNOTES*»*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THF wi.iMRep IS THE MIUIM'JM C'JAf.'TITATICN LIWIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91285 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 104-SD COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 0900 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CHLOROMETHANE
46U VINYL CHLORIDE
46U BROMOMETHANE
46U CHLOROETHANE
46U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
46U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLLNE)
460U ACETONE
110U CARBON DISULFIDE
46U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
46U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
46U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
460U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
46U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROFORM
46U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
46U 1 , 2-Dir.HLOROETHANE
46U BENZENE
46U TRICHLOROETHENEC TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
46U DIBROMOMETHANE
46U BROMODICHLOROME THANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
110U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
46U TOLUENE
46U TRANS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
46U 1.1.?-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
110U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
46U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U ETHYL BENZENE
46U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
46U O-XYLENE
46U STYRENE
46U BROMOFORM
46U BROMOBENZENE
46U 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
4bU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
46U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
••~REMARKS*** **'REMARKS***
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
•••FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETETTFD THE NUMRFP IS TUE MINIMUM I TAT ION LIWIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91286 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
•• SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC **
»« STATION
**
ID: 105-SD
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
0740 STOP: 00/00/00 »•
* *
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
42U CHLOROMETHANE
42U VINYL CHLORIDE
42U BROMOMETHANE
42U CHLOROETHANE
42U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
42U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
420U ACETONE
100U CARBON DISULFIDE
42U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
42U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
42U 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
42U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
42U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
420U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
42U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
42U CHLOROFORM
42U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
42U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
42U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
42U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
42U BENZENE
42U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
42U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
42U DI BROMOME THANE
42U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
42U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
100U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
42U TOLUENE
42U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
42U 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
42U TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
42U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
100U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
42U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
42U CHLOROBENZENE
42U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
42U ETHYL BENZENE
42U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
42U O-XYLENE
42U STYRENE
42U BROMOFORM
42U BROMOBENZENE
42U 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
42U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
42U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
42U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
42U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
42U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
42U 1,2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
»*»REMARKS»*« »*»REMARKS»»»
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE «N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN »L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~ U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Thf mmurfp IS THE MINIMUM O'JAJ.'TITATICfJ LIMIT
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91287 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
•• SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC «»
»• STATION
* •
ID: 106-SD
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94
1650 STOP: 00/00/00 »*
• *
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CHLOROMETHANE
46U VINYL CHLORIDE
46U BROMOMETHANE
46U CHLOROETHANE
46U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
46U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLfcNE)
460U ACETONE
110U CARBON DISULFIDE
46U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
46U TRANS-1.2-DICHL OROE THENE
46U 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
46U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
460U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
46U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROFORM
46U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
46U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
46U BENZENE
46U TRICHLOROETHENEC TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
46U DIBROMOMETHANE
46U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
110U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
46U TOLUENE
46U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U 1 J,?-TRICHLOROETHANE
15J TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
110U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
46U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U ETHYL BENZENE
46U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
46U O-XYLENE
46U STYRENE
46U BROMOFORM
46U BROMOBENZENE
46U 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
46U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,4-DlCHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*»'REMARKS*•» »»«REMARKS»»»
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
»»'FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED The immmbfp k thf O'J—J'ITAT ICN LIMIT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
12/01/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91288 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
STATION ID: 107-SD COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1550 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
36U CHLOROMETHANE
36U VINYL CHLORIDE
36U BROMOMETHANE
36U CHLOROETHANE
36U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
36U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
360U ACETONE
89U CARBON DISULFIDE
36U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
36U TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
36U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
36U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
36U 2,2-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
360U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
36U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
36U CHLOROFORM
36U 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
36U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
36U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
36U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
36U BENZENE
36U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
36U 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
36U DIBROMOMETHANE
36U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
36U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
89U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
36U TOLUENE
36U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
36U 1,1,?-TRICHLOROETHANE
36U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
36U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
89U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
36U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
36U CHLOROBENZENE
36U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
36U ETHYL BENZENE
36U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
36U O-XYLENE
36U STYRENE
36U BROMOFORM
36U BROMOBENZENE
36U 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
3bU 1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
36U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
36U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
36U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
36U 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
36U 1,2-DICHL0R0BENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*»'REMARKS*»* »«»REMARKS»*«
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
«»*FOOTNOTES«»*
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED «NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
«K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED TMF niiurfp 15 tup MIS'IM'JV CUi^TITATICM LIV"
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91289 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
*» SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC »»
»» STATION
* *
ID: 108-SD
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94
1425 STOP: 00/00/00 *»
**
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
38U CHLOROMETHANE
38U VINYL CHLORIDE
38U BROMOMETHANE
38U CHLOROETHANE
38U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
38U 1,1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
380U ACETONE
96U CARBON DISULFIDE
38U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
38U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
38U 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
4.4J CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
38U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
380U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
38U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
38U CHLOROFORM
38U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
38U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
38U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
38U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
38U BENZENE
38U TRICHLOROETHENEC TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
38U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
38U DIBROMOMETHANE
38U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
38U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
96U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
38U TOLUENE
38U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
38U 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
38U TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
38U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
96U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
38U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
38U CHLOROBENZENE
38U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
38U ETHYL BENZENE
38U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
38U 0—XYLENE
38U STYRENE
38U BROMOFORM
38U BROMOBENZENE
38U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
38U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
38U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
38U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
38U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
38U 1,4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
38U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
**'REMARKS*** **'REMARKS***
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
* "FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED Thf niimbE" IS TUE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
12/01 /94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91290 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 109-SD
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
38U CHLOROMETHANE
38U VINYL CHLORIDE
38U BROMOMETHANE
38U CHLOROETHANE
38U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
38U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
380U ACETONE
96U CARBON DISULFIDE
38U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
38U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
38U 1.1-DICHLOROE THANE
38U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
38U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
380U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
38U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
38U CHLOROFORM
38U 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
38U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
38U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
38U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
38U BENZENE
38U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
38U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
38U DIBROMOMETHANE
38U BR0M0D1CHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/07/94 1128 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
38U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
96U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
38U TOLUENE
38U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROP ENE
38U 1,1.?-TRICHLOROETHANE
38U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
38U 1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PANE
96U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
38U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
38U CHLOROBENZENE
38U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
38U ETHYL BENZENE
38U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
38U O-XYLENE
38U STYRENE
38U BROMOFORM
38U BROMOBENZENE
38U 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
3BU 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
38U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
38U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
38U 1.3-DICHL0R0BENZENE
38U 1.4-DICHL0R0BENZENE
38U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
»»'REMARKS'*« '"REMARKS'"
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
***#A^AVERAGE VALUE »NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
»K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DFTEfTED Thf wi.imrfp IS THE MINIMUM S'Ji^TJT'TJON LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 12/01/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*» PROJECT
NO. 95-0048
SAMPLE NO. 91291 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
BY: B BERRANG **
•• SOURCE:
GE/SHEPHERD
FARM
CITY: E FLAT ROC
ST: NC •«
»* STATION
**
ID: 110-SD
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94
1505 STOP: 00/00/00 »»
* *
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CHLOROMETHANE
46U VINYL CHLORIDE
46U BROMOMETHANE
46U CHLOROETHANE
46U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
46U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
460U ACETONE
110U CARBON DISULFIDE
46U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
46U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 1,1-DICHLOROE THANE
46U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
46CU METHYL ETHYL KETONE
46U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROFORM
46U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
46U 1 2-DTC.HLOROETHANE
46U BENZENE
46U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
46U DIBROMOMETHANE
46U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CIS-1,3-DICHL0R0PR0PENE
110U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
46U TOLUENE
46U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
110U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
46U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U ETHYL BENZENE
46U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
46U O-XYLENE
46U STYRENE
46U BROMOFORM
46U BROMOBENZENE
46U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
46U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
»*»REMARKS»«» »»*REMARKS*»*
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
» »'FOOTNOTES* * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES »J—ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETEfTFn mmMRFP IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/01/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91293 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 205-SD
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 0740 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U CHLOROMETHANE
25U VINYL CHLORIDE
25U BROMOMETHANE
25U CHLOROETHANE
25U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
25U 1.1-DICHL0R0ETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
250U ACETONE
62U CARBON DISULFIDE
75U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
25U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
25U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
25U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
25U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
250U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
25U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
25U CHLOROFORM
25U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
25U 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
25U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
25U 1,2-DTCHLOROETHANE
25U BENZENE
25U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
25U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
25U DIBROMOMETHANE
25U BROMODICHLOROME THANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
62U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
25U TOLUENE
25U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
25U 1,1,?-TRICHLOROETHANE
25U TETRACHLOROETHENE( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
25U 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
62U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
25U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
25U CHLOROBENZENE
25U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
25U ETHYL BENZENE
25U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
25U O-XYLENE
25U STYRENE
25U BROMOFORM
25U BROMOBENZENE
25U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
2bU 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
25U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
25U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
25U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
25U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
25U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
• * * FOOTNOTES* * *
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE 'N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
»U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTFD twF niimwfp tuc 1 T"
-------
PURGEABLE ORGAN ICS DATA REPORT
********************
PROJECT NO. 95-0048 SAMPLE NO. 91292
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERO FARM
STATION ID: 111-SD
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/08/94
SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIM
*************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLAT ROC ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/08/94 1700 STOP: 00/00/00
* * * * *
*******************************************************
********
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CHLOROHETHANE
46U VINYL CHLORIDE
46U BROMOMETHANE
46U CHLOROETHANE
46U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
46U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
460U ACETONE
110U CARBON DISULFIDE
46U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
46U TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 1,1 - DI CHLOROETHANE
46U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
46U 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
460U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
46U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
46U CHLOROFORM
46U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
46U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
46U BENZENE
46U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
46U D1BROMOMETHANE
46U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
46U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
110U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
46U TOLUENE
46U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
46U 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
46U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
46U 1,3-D ICHLOROPROPANE
110U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
46U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANF
46U CHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U ETHYL BENZENE
46U (M- AND/OR P-)XYLENE
46U O-XYLENE
46U STYRENE
46U BROMOFORH
46U BROMOBENZENE
46U 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
46U 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
46U O-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U P-CHLOROTOLUENE
46U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
46U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
DATA REPORTED ON WET WEIGHT BASIS
***REMARKS**
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** ****************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91394 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
~~ SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
** STATION ID: 250 COLLECTION START: 11/15/94 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 *
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.20U
SILVER
10U
CALCIUM
0.60U
ARSENIC
2.0U
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
1.0U
IRON
0.20U
BARIUM
40U
SODIUM
0.10U
BERYLLIUM
40U
POTASSIUM
0.10U
CADMIUM
0.20U
COBALT
0.201)
CHROMIUM
1.0
COPPER
0.20U
MOLYBDENUM
0.40U
NICKEL
0.80U
LEAD
0.60U
ANTIMONY
0.80U
SELENIUM
0.50U
TIN
0.20U
STRONTIUM
1.0U
TELLURIUM
0.20U
TITANIUM
2.0U
THALLIUM
0.20U
VANADIUM
0.20U
YTTRIUM
0.72
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
NA
MERCURY
4.0U
ALUMINUM
0.20U
MANGANESE
~"REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
•~~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM SL'ANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** ****************************************************************
~~ PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91395 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
~~ SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
~~ STATION ID: 260 COLLECTION START: 11/16/94 1200 STOP: 00/00/50 *
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.20U
SILVER
10U
CALCIUM
0.60U
ARSENIC
2.0U
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
1.0U
IRON
0.20U
BARIUM
40U
SODIUM
0.10U
BERYLLIUM
40U
POTASSIUM
0.10U
CADMIUM
0.20U
COBALT
0.20U
CHROMIUM
1.6
COPPER
0.20U
MOLYBDENUM
0.40U
NICKEL
0.80U
LEAD
0.60U
ANTIMONY
0.80U
SELENIUM
0.50U
TIN
0.20U
STRONTIUM
1.0U
TELLURIUM
0.20U
TITANIUM
2.0U
THALLIUM
O.20U
VANADIUM
0.20U
YTTRIUM
1.2
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
NA
MERCURY
4.0U
ALUMINUM
0.20U
MANGANESE
•~~REMARKS"* ~•~REMARKS"*
~~~FOOTNOTES"*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUHPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRF^CfJCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON01/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** ****************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91396 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
** STATION ID: 270 COLLECTION START: 11/14/94 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 *
UG/BO
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/BO
0.20U
SILVER
10U
CALCIUM
0.60U
ARSENIC
2.0U
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
1.3
IRON
0.20U
BARIUM
40U
SODIUM
0.10U
BERYLLIUM
40U
POTASSIUM
0.10U
CADMIUM
0.20U
COBALT
0.20U
CHROMIUM
1.6
COPPER
0.20U
MOLYBDENUM
0.40U
NICKEL
0.80U
LEAD
0.60U
ANTIMONY
0.80U
SELENIUM
0.50U
TIN
0.20U
STRONTIUM
1.0U
TELLURIUM
0.20U
TITANIUM
2.0U
THALLIUM
0.20U
VANADIUM
0.20U
YTTRIUM
1.8
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
NA
MERCURY
4.0U
ALUMINUM
0.20U
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•"REMARKS***
•••REMARKS***
•"FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ONO1/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT
*** ****************************************************************
** PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91393 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG *
** SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC *
*• STATION ID: 200 COLLECTION START: 11/17/94 1340 STOP: 00/00/00 *
UG/L
2.0U
SILVER
6.0U
ARSENIC
NA
BORON
2.0U
BARIUM
1.0U
BERYLLIUM
1.0U
CADMIUM
2.0U
COBALT
2.00
CHROMIUM
2.0U
COPPER
2.0U
MOLYBDENUM
4.0U
NICKEL
8.0U
LEAD
6.0U
ANTIMONY
8.0U
SELENIUM
5.0U
TIN
2.0U
STRONTIUM
10U
TELLURIUM
2.0U
TITANIUM
20U
THALLIUM
2.0U
VANADIUM
2.0U
YTTRIUM
3.0U
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.2U
MERCURY
40U
ALUMINUM
2.0U
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L
0.10U
0.020U
0.010U
0.40U
0.40U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
~••REMARKS***
~"REMARKS***
•"FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
********************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91394
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 250
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
01/13/95
************
SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK
****************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CI'.Y: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/15/94 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
************************
************
UG/BO
O.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.50U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
DELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I (AIPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4' -DDT (P,P'-DDT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
/1
UG/BO
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
8.0U
0.40U
0.20U
*******************
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
/2
~~~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE FVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/13/95
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
' it*****************#*********************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91395 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
STATION ID: 260 COLLECTION START: 11/16/94 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.20U ALDRIN
0.20U HEPTACHLOR
0.20U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.20U ALPHA-BHC
0.20U BETA-BHC
0.20U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.20U DELTA-BHC
0.20U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.20U 0IELDRIN
0.20U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
0.20U 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
0.20U 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
0.20U ENDRIN
0.20U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.20U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.50U CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /I
1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
1.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
1.0U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
1.0U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
1.0U PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
8.0U TOXAPHENE
-- CHLORDENE /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
-- BETA CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
-- GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
-- TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
-- ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
-- CIS-NONACHLOR /2
-- OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2
0.40U METHOXYCHLOR
0.20U ENDRIN KETONE
***FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-EST1MATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
T0TO2MISK: [EPADZC] PROOHVOA. LST; 1
T0T02SDISK:[EPADZC]PROOPCBMISC.LST;1
-------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
01/24/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 2 70
913 96 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/14/94 1430 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/BO
0 .10U
0.10U
0.10U
0 .10U
0. 10U
0 .10U
0 . 10U
0 .10U
0 . 10U
0 . 10U
0.10U
0 .10U
0.10U
0 .10U
0 .10U
0.25U
0 . 50U
0.50U
0 . 50U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/BO
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
DELTA-BHC
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
/I
0.50U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.50U PCB-124B (AROCLOR 1248)
0.50U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
0.50U PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
5.OU TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE /2
ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE)
0.2 5U METHOXYCHLOR
0.10U ENDRIN KETONE
/ 2
~REMARKS'"
~REMARKS*
* * * FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/06/94
**********************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91394
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 250
*************************
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
40U (3-AND/OR 4OMETHYLPHEN0L
40U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
40U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
40U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
80U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
40U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
40U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
40U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
80U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
40U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
40U 2-METHYLPHENOL
40U 2-NITROANILINE
40U 2-N1TROPHENOL
40U 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
40U 3-NITROANILINE
40U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
40U 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
40U 4-CHLOROANILINE
40U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
40U 4-NITROANILINE
80U 4-NITROPHENOL
40U ACENAPHTHENE
40U ACENAPHTHYLENE
40U ANTHRACENE
40U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
40U BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK
***************************
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/15/94 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
********************
***
**
**
**
**
**************** ***
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
40U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
40U BENZO-A-PYRENE
40U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
40U BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
40U BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
40U BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
40U CARBAZOLE
40U CHRYSENE
40U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
40U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
40U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
40U DIBENZOFURAN
40U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
40U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
40U FLUORANTHENE
40U FLUORENE
40U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
40U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
40U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
40U HEXACHLOROETHANE
40U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
40U ISOPHORONE
40U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
40U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAM INE/DIPHENYLAMINE
40U NAPHTHALENE
40U NITROBENZENE
80U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
40U PHENANTHRENE
40U PHENOL
40U PYRENE
'REMARKS***
~REMARKS***
"~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/06/94
***************************************************************
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91395
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 260
-************************
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
40U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
40U 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
40U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
40U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHL0R0PHEN0L
40U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
80U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
40U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
40U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
40U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
40U 2-CHLOROPHENOL
80U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
40U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
40U 2-METHYLPHENOL
40U 2-NITROANILINE
40U 2-NITROPHENOL
40U 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
40U 3-NITROANILINE
40U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
40U 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
40U 4-CHLOROANILINE
40U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
40U 4-NITROANILINE
80U 4-NITROPHENOL
40U ACENAPHTHENE
40U ACENAPHTHYLENE
40U ANTHRACENE
40U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
40U BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK
***
**
**
**
**
************************************* ***
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/16/94 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
40U BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
40U BENZO-A-PYRENE
40U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
40U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
40U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
40U BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
40U CARBAZOLE
40U CHRYSENE
40U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
40U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
40U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
40U DIBENZOFURAN
40U DIETHYL PHTHALATE
40U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
40U FLUORANTHENE
40U FLUORENE
40U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
40U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
40U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
40U HEXACHLOROETHANE
40U INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
40U ISOPHORONE
40U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
40U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
40U NAPHTHALENE
40U NITROBENZENE
80U PENTACHLOROPHENOL
40U PHENANTHRENE
40U PHENOL
40U PYRENE
~"REMARKS**
^REMARKS***
~~~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
EXTRACTABLE ORGAN!CS DATA REPORT
****************4
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 270
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*****************************************
91396 SAMPLE TYPE: DRYICEBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/14/94 1430 STOP: 00/00/00
12/12/94
* * * * *
***********************************************
***********
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
20.UJ (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
20.UJ 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
20.UJ 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
20.UJ 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL
20.UJ 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20.UJ 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20.UJ 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
20.UJ 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
40.UJ 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20.UJ 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
20.UJ 2,6-D1NITROTOLUENE
20.UJ 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20.UJ 2-CHLOROPHENOL
40.UJ 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
20.UJ 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
20.UJ 2-METHYLPHENOL
20.UJ 2-NITROANILINE
20.UJ 2-NITROPHENOL
20.UJ 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
20.UJ 3-NITROANILINE
20.UJ 4-BROHOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
20.UJ 4-CHLORO-3-HETHYLPHENOL
20.UJ 4-CHLOROANILINE
20.UJ 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
20.UJ 4-NITROANILINE
40.UJ 4-NITROPHENOL
20.UJ ACENAPHTHENE
20.UJ ACENAPHTHYLENE
20.UJ ANTHRACENE
20.UJ BENZ0(A)ANTHRACENE
20.UJ BENZ0(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/BO ANALYTICAL RESULTS
20.UJ BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
20.UJ BENZO-A-PYRENE
20.UJ BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
20.UJ BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
20.UJ BIS(2-CHL0R0ETHYL) ETHER
20.UJ BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
20.UJ CARBAZOLE
20.UJ CHRYSENE
20.UJ DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
20.UJ DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
20.UJ DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
20.UJ DIBENZOFURAN
20.UJ DIETHYL PHTHALATE
20.UJ DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
20.UJ FLUORANTHENE
20.UJ FLUORENE
20.UJ HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
20.UJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
20.UJ HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
20.UJ HEXACHLOROETHANE
20.UJ INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
20.UJ ISOPHORONE
20.UJ H-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
20.UJ N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
20.UJ NAPHTHALENE
20.UJ NITROBENZENE
40.UJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL
20.UJ PHENANTHRENE
20.UJ PHENOL
20.UJ PYRENE
••~REMARKS***
•REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAl-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------
tfXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
12/01/94
PROJECT NO. 95-0090 SAMPLE NO. 91393
SOURCE: GE/SHEPHERD FARM
STATION ID: 200
SAMPLE TYPE: BLK.WA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: B BERRANG
CITY: E FLATROCK ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 11/17/94 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
20U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHEN0L
20U
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
20U
1,2,4-TRICHL0R0BENZENE
20U
BENZO-A-PYRENE
20U
2,2'-CHL0R0IS0PR0PYLETHER
20U
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
20U
2,3,4,6-TETRACHL0R0PHEN0L
20U
BISC 2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
20U
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20U
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
20U
2.4,6-TRICHLOROP HENOL
20U
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
20U
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
20U
CARBAZOLE
20U
2,4-0IMETHYLPHENOL
20U
CHRYSENE
40U
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20U
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
20U
2,4-DINITR0T0LUENE
20 U
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
20U
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
20U
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
20U
2-CHL0R0NAPHTHALENE
20U
DIBENZOFURAN
20U
2—CHLOROPHENOL
20U
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
40U
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
20U
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
20U
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
20U
FLUORANTHENE
20U
2-METHYLPHENOL
20U
FLUORENE
20U
2-NITROANILINE
20U
HEXACHLOROBENZENE CHCB)
20U
2-NITROPHENOL
20U
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
20U
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
20U
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
20U
3-NITROANILINE
20U
HEXACHLOROETHANE
20U
4-BR0M0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
20U
INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE
20U
4-CHL0R0-3-METHYLPHEN0L
20U
ISOPHORONE
20U
4-CHL0R0ANILINE
20U
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
20U
4-CHL0R0PHENYL PHENYL ETHER
20U
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
20U
4-NITROANILINE
20U
NAPHTHALENE
40U
4-NITROPHENOL
20U
NITROBENZENE
20U
ACENAPHTHENE
40U
PENTACHLOROPHEMOL
20U
ACENAPHTHYI.FNE
20U
PHENANTHRENE
OfVt
ANTHRACENE
20U
PHENOL
20U
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
20U
PYRENE
20U
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••FOOTNOTES***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE »N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
• U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMRfp IS THE MI'.'IM'JM O'JAf.'TITiTJOr; LIWIT.
------- |