PREIMPOUNDMENT STUDY
OF
WEST POINT LAKE, GEORGIA
TECHNICAL STUDY
TS03-71-208-001.2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
SOUTHEAST WATER LAB
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
ATHENS, GEORGIA
JANUARY 1972
-------
PREIMPOUNDMENT STUDY
OF
WEST POINT LAKE, GEORGIA
Robert F. Schneider
David W. Hill
M. Ronald Weldon
Ralph E. Gentry
U.S. Environmental Protection Ager:,
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center
Region 4 Library
61 Forsyth Street S.W.
muftiia, Georgia 30303
Technical Study
TS 03-71-208-001.2
Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
Southeast Water Laboratory
Surveillance and Analysis Division
Athens, Georgia
January 1972
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
SUMMARY 3
CONCLUSIONS 8
RECOMMENDATIONS 9
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA 10
CHATTAHOOCHEE WATERSHED 10
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE 10
THE STUDY AREA 12
STUDY METHODS 28
SAMPLING STATIONS 28
SAMPLING SCHEDULE 28
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES . 29
BIOLOGICAL ANALYSES 29
BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES 32
STUDY FINDINGS
PREVIOUS STUDIES 36
1970-1971 STUDIES 40
RAINFALL AND RIVERFLOW 40
CORRELATIONS OF FLOW WITH WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS .... 40
TEMPERATURE 44
COLOR AND TURBIDITY 44
pH, CONDUCTIVITY AND SOLIDS 46
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND 47
i
-------
Table of Contents cont'd
Page
ALKALINITY 49
CHLORIDE 49
NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS 49
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 50
IRON AND MANGANESE 51
DIUBNAL STUDIES 53
PHYTOPLANKTON 53
PERIPHYTON 53
MACROINVERTEBRATES 62
COLIFORM BACTERIA 65
ISOLATION OF SALMONELLA 73
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES FOLLOWING IMPOUNDMENT 83
GENERAL 83
PHYSICAL CHANGES 83
CHEMICAL CHANGES 84
BIOLOGICAL CHANGES 85
REFERENCES 87
APPENDICES
A Correspondence Requesting the Study
B Location of Sampling Stations
C USPHS Water Quality Data for the Chattahoochee River
Basin 1964, 1965, and 1966
D A Brief Biological Survey of the Chattahoochee River
and Selected Tributary Streams by William M. Beck, Jr.,
June 1965.
ii
-------
Table of Contents cont'd
APPENDICES cont'd
E Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data, Chattahoochee River
Basin, August and September 1970
F Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data, Chattahoochee River
Basin, February 1971
G Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data for a Diurnal Study
at Stations 5, 6, 10 and 12, Chattahoochee River Basin,
September 1970
H Phytoplankton Data for West Point Preimpoundment Surveys,
September 1970 and February 1971
I Seasonal Distribution of Invertebrates Collected from Artificial
Substrates in the Chattahoochee River and Major Tributaries
Within the West Point Lake (Preimpoundment Study)
J Georgia Water Quality Standards and Chattachoochee River
Classification
PARTICIPATING STAFF
iii
-------
FIGURES
Page
Figure 1. The West Point Gravity-type Dam Being Constructed
in the Chattahoochee River, Georgia 11
Figure 2. The Chattahoochee River Downstream from the West
Point Dam 11
Figure 3. Sampling Stations - Location Map Rear of Report
Figure 4. The Shallow Chattahoochee River Near Georgia Highway
109 Bridge Crossing 13
Figure 5. The Deering Milliken Industrial Water Intake. . . 14
Figure 6. The "Old" City of LaGrange Municipal Water Intake
on the Shoreline of the Chattahoochee River,Ga. . 14
Figure 7. The Newly Constructed City of LaGrange Municipal
Water Intake Designed for the Expected Reservoir
Depths 14
Figure 8. City of LaGrange, Hogansville Road Sewage Treat-
ment Plant. . 16
Figure 9. City of LaGrange, Yellowjacket Creek Sewage Treat-
ment Plant. 16
Figure 10. U. S. Rubber Company Textile Plant at Hogansville,
Georgia 17
Figure 11. The Franklin Aluminum Company on the Chattahoochee
River Near Franklin, Georgia 18
Figure 12. The City of Franklin, Georgia, Sewage Treatment
Plant 18
Figure 13. The Southeast Water Laboratoary Mobile Unit at
LaGrange, Georgia 30
Figure 14. Artificial Substrate Used to Collect Periphyton . 33
Figure 15. Artificial Substrate Used to Collect Macroinver-
tebrates 33
Figure 16. Dissolved Oxygen Profiles Upstream From West
Point Site (From Georgia Water Quality Board) . . 37
iv
-------
List of Figures cont'd
Page
Figure 17. Fecal Coliform - Geometric Means - Upstream From
West Point Site 38
Figure 18. Stream flow During the Survey Periods 41
Figure 18A.Coliform Counts Averages (Left and Right Banks) of
Station 12 at Franklin 42
Figure 19. Average Water Temperature During Survey Periods . . 45
Figure 20. Average Hourly Quality Varations at Stations 5,
6, 10 and 12, September 17, 1970 54
Figure 21. Comparison of Average Total Phytoplankton
Populations (Summer and Winter Survey Period) ... 55
Figure 22. Relative Density of Certain Invertebrates at
Each Station During the Summer Survey 63
Figure 22A.Relative Density of Certain Investebrates at Each
Station During the Winter Survey 64
Figure 23. Geometric Mean Total Coliform Densities at the
Chattahoochee River Stations 67
Figure 24. Geometric Mean Fecal Coliform Densities at the
Chattahoochee River Stations 68
Figure 25. Geometric Mean Total and Fecal Coliform Densities
at the Tributary Stations 69
Figure 26. Coliform Dieoff Pattern Within Chattahoochee River
Study Area Expressed in Percent of Initial Density
Entering the Study Area 71
Figure 27. Comparison of the Geometric Mean Total Coliform
Densities at the River Stations in Wet and Dry
Periods 74
Figure 28. Comparison of the Geometric Mean Fecal Coliform
Densities at the River Stations in Wet and Dry
Periods 75
Figure 29. Comparison of the Geometric Mean Total Coliform
Densities at the Tributary Stations in Wet Period
and Dry Period 76
Figure 30. Comparison of the Geometric Mean Fecal Coliform
Densities at Tributary Stations in Wet Period and
Dry Period 77
v
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table I. Sources of Municipal Pollution to the
Chattahoochee River ....
21
Table II. Sources of Industrial Pollution
27
Table III. Physical and Chemical Analyses
31
Table IV. Identification Scheme for Salmonella Suspects . . 35
Table VI. Comparison of Average Biomass and Relative
Abundance of Periphyton Summer 1970 and Winter 1971 .... 56
Table VII. Periphyton Population at Sampling Stations in the
Chattahoochee River and Tributaries (August 1970) 58
Table VIII. Periphyton Population at Sampling Stations in the
Chattahoochee River and Tributaries (February 1971) .... 60
Table IX. Bacteriological Data Summary 66
Table X. Coliform Densities-Rainfall. Periods Versus Dry
Periods 78
Table XI. Fecal Coliform Densities and Salmonella Serotypes
Recovered at Selected Stations During Summer Study 80
Table XII. Fecal Coliform Densities and Salmonella Serotypes
Recovered at Selected Stations During Winter Study 81
Table V. Rainfall Data
43
vi
-------
P EEIMP OUNDMENT STUDY
OF
WEST POINT LAKE, GEORGIA
INTRODUCTION
The Southeast Region, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Water Programs was requested by letter of 6 February 1970 from
the U. S. Army Engineer District, Savannah, Georgia, to conduct a
preimpoundment water quality study for the West Point Project.
Authorization for such a study may be found in Section 5c of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act (PL 84-660) as amended by PL 87-80,
PL 89-234, PL 89-753, and PL 91-224. Correspondence concerning the
study request is contained in Appendix A.
The Environmental Protection Agency extends its gratitude to the
following agencies and individuals for their cooperation with
Southeast Water Laboratory (SEWL) personnel during the survey:
• The U. S. Corps of Engineers and Mr. 0. B. Stewart, Jr.
Resident Engineer, for providing maps and pertinent
impoundment information.
• U. S. Geological Survey for providing streamflow data.
• Messrs. Hughes, Sherrer, White, Norsworth and Levens of
the City of LaGrange, Georgia, for arranging mobile
laboratory space.
• Mr. Roy Relihan and the National Climatic Center Office
in LaGrange, Georgia, for providing temperature and rain-
fall data.
-------
2
Personnel from the Southeast Water Laboratory conducted field
studies during August and September 1970 and February 1971 to deter-
mine annual seasonal varations in important physical, chemical and
biological water quality parameters within and immediately down-
stream from the future reservoir. Data from these seasonal studies
in conjunction with earlier study data (1)(2)(3) provided sufficient
information to describe preimpoundment water quality conditions.
-------
3
SUMMARY
The West Point Lake is to be located in west-central
Georgia in a 3,380 square-mile watershed. Seventy percent of the
watershed is farmland and 30 percent is industrial and residential
(largely the Metropolitan Atlanta area). The reservoir will
cover 25,900 acres at maximum power pool of 635 feet above mean sea
level. It is designed to provide hydroelectric power, flood control,
navigation, water supply and recreation. Preimpoundment water quality
was determined from U. S. Public Health Service studies in 1964,
1965 and 1966; from Georgia Water Quality Control Board studies in 1968
and 1969; and from EPA, SEWL studies in 1970 and 1971
1. The studies showed the following physical characteristics:
a. Maximum water temperatures ranged from 25O-290C during
the hot, dry summer periods.
b. Water color values did not exceed 65 cobalt color units and
generally averaged from 15 to 25.
c. During heavy runoff periods, the river, and to a lesser
degree, its tributaries became reddish in color due to
suspended clay sediment. Turbidity values reached highs
of 250 Jackson candle units, with average values of 23 to
55 in the summer and 46 to 96 in the winter.
d. Mineral content of the waters was low. Specific conductance
ranged from 33 to 84 ymhos/cm. Alkalinities seldom
exceeded 20 mg/1 as CaC03 while total dissolved solids rarely
exceeded 150 mg/1.
-------
4
2. Chemical Characteristics (EPA 1970-71 summer and winter studies
combined):
a. The pH of the waters in the Chattahoochee and tributary
streams varied 0.7 unit or less from pH 7.
b. At the station closest to Atlanta (Station 12 at Franklin —
the station farthest upstream) the dissolved oxygen content
was less than 5 mg/1 several times during the low flow periods
of August and September 1970 with a low of 3.4 mg/1. Down-
stream and tributary stations usually had values above 6 mg/1
even during the summer low-flow conditions.
c. At the same station (No. 12) the BOD^ value reached a maximum
of 2.8 mg/1 during stable summertime flows. Although this
value is low, it is nearly twice the next highest value
(1.5 mg/1) recorded at any other station studied in the
summer. Following winter rainstorms, BOD5 values reached
highs of 5.7 mg/1 in Wehadkee Creek (Station 13) and 5.2
mg/1 in the Chattahoochee at Station 10 (15 miles down-
stream from Franklin) reflecting the unstable wintertime
streamflows and associated flushing action.
d. Total organic carbon (TOC) reached a maximum of 14.0 mg/1 during
the 1970 and 1971 surveys at Station 10 following a very
heavy winter rain. Generally TOC averaged 3.5 to 6.5 mg/1.
e. Organic nitrogen (total kjeldahl nitrogen less ammonia
nitrogen) seldom exceeded 0.7 mg/1 except during high, winter
flows when it reached 1.4 mg/1 at several stations. Inorganic
nitrogen (sum of ammonia, nitrite and nitrate forms) ranged
from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/1.
-------
5
£. Total phosphorus consistently ranged from 0.2 to 0.4
mg/1 as F, one-half or less of which was the soluble form.
g. Total Iron content in the Chattahoochee water ranged from
0.2 to 73.0 mg/1. (Both extremes were from the Chattahoochee;
the high was about 5 times the mean — Sta. 10B in February
1970.) The dissolved iron concentration often exceeded 0.3 mg/1,
reaching a maximum value in August 1970 of 0.8 mg/1 at
Station 2, just downstream from the proposed dam site.
h. Total manganese station averages throughout the study area
ranged from 0.13 to 0.43 mg/1, and the average dissolved
manganese concentration ranged from 0.04 to 0.17 mg/1. The
highest single value for dissolved manganese (0.44 mg/1) was
recorded from Wehadkee Creek (Station 4). Six other stations
had dissolved manganese maximums ranging from 0.20 mg/1 to
0.25 mg/1.
3. Bacteriological Characteristics (for both summer and winter
EPA studies):
a. The arithmetic mean fecal coliform densities upstream from
Station 3 (just upstream from the proposed dam site) were in
violation of the present Georgia recommended recreation
standard of 1000 fecal coliforms per 100 ml.*
b. Station 12 (the farthest upstream station) yielded the
highest geometric mean total coliform density (66,000/100 ml)
and the highest geometric mean fecal coliform density
(5,100/100 ml) recorded during the study. These high
* Number currently under review. See discussion in text on page 67.
-------
densities, reflected upstream sanitary waste discharges
principally from the greater Atlanta area.
A 70 to 80 percent decrease in indicator densities occurred
in the river reach from Franklin, Georgia, to West Pont,
Georgia.
Fecal pollution was evident in Yellowjacket Creek as a
result of treated discharges from the City of LaGrange's
Yellowjacket Waste Treatment Plant and the Hogansville,
Georgia, Sewage Treatment Plant. Upstream from the Yellow-
jacket plant (Station 9) the geometric mean fecal coliform
density was 600/100 ml. Downstream (Station 8) densities
increased to a geometric mean of 1800/100 ml.
Minor fecal contamination appeared to be contributed by
wildlife and livestock, primarily in the tributaries
studies. Geometric mean fecal coliform densities were generally
less than 600/100 ml.
Rainstorms during both the 1970-71 seasonal studies caused an
expected rise in bacterial indicator densities. Additional
fecal contamination and nonfecal soil related coliform strains
were introduced into the streams by land runoff.
Serotypes of Salmonella were isolated at seven stations during
the summer study and at all 13 stations during the winter study.
The summer isolation came from five of the seven main-stem
Chattahoochee stations and from the tributary stations down-
stream from wastewater treatment plants.
-------
7
4. Biological Characteristics (1970-71 EPA studies):
a. In Yellowjacket and Wehadkee Creeks, over 90 percent (by
number) of the attached periphyton were filamentous blue-
green algae. Similar algal growth was found in the
Chattachoochee River during the summer study. At
Station 6 (about the mid-point of the proposed reservoir)
over 70 percent of the algae (by number) were attached
filamentous blue-greens.
b. Phytoplankton densities did not exceed 600 algal cells
per milliliter during the 1970 and 1971 surveys.
c. During the August-September 1970 low water study, the
Chattahoochee River benthos (bottom) from Franklin, Georgia,
to Station 10 (15 miles downstream) was biologically degraded.
A profuse benthic population of leeches, worms and snails
reflected an organically polluted environment. Farther downstream
and in the major tributaries, a healthy benthic faunal community
occurred.
-------
8
CONCLUSIONS
The potential for accelerated eutrophication and Its associated
nuisance problems are increased greatly by both past and current
municipal and industrial development in the West Point Lake
watershed.
Thermal stratification is expected to occur following impound-
ment. Associated hypolimnetic problems of low dissolved oxygen,
sulfide odors, and high levels, of dissolved iron and manganese
(which interfere with water supply uses) may also occur unless
corrective measures are taken.
Numerous isolations of Salmonella serotypes from the study area
indicate that several areas are hazardous for primary contact
recreation at the present time. Fecal coliform densities at
many stations violate recreational water quality criteria.
After closure of the dam, the increased residence time in the
lake will tend to dampen water quality variations now present
in the free-flowing streams and partially reduce bacterial
densities and water turbidity from preimpoundment levels to
levels acceptable for a variety of water uses.
Water quality should improve following completion of secondary
biological treatment and chlorination at Atlanta's R.M. Clayton
wastewater treatment plant (scheduled for May 1973). Most
other wastewater treatment plants in the Atlanta area that
discharge to the Chattahoochee River will also provide secondary
treatment and disinfection by that time. However, combined
sewer discharges from Atlanta during rains will probably cause
problems for years to come.
-------
9
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Postimpoundment studies should be conducted as soon as stable
conditions are reached within the lake and downstream from
the dam in order to determine water quality changes. If
adverse conditions exist, implementation of remedial measures
should begin as soon as possible.
2. Water suppliers should be kept advised by the Corps of Engineers
in cooperation with state agencies of the postimpoundment
concentrations of dissolved iron, manganese and sulfides. The
water suppliers may need selective water level withdrawal
techniques, water treatment modification, or other water quality
control techniques.
3. To preclude water quality problems associated with thermal
stratification of the reservoir, preventative measures must
be taken — primarily to avoid anaerobic conditions in the hypo-
limnetic zone. Preventative measures include, but are not
limited to, artificial destratification or direct oxygenation
of the hypolimnion without destratification (The former has
proven effective for large impoundments). The reservoir area
near the dam would require principal attention to avoid release
of poor quality water, but other areas may need treatment to
protect water supplies withdrawn from the reservoir.
4. Primary contact recreation should be restricted in upper reaches
of the proposed reservoir until bacterial quality is determined
at the time and immediately after filling (in consultation
with the Georgia Water Quality Control Board). Restrictive
zoning may be necessary in the future.
-------
10
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA
CHATTAHOOCHEE WATERSHED
The Chattahoochee River rises in the Blue Ridge Mountains in
northeast Georgia form the confluence of several headstreams. It
flows 235 miles southwestward across northern Georgia to West Point,
then turns southward forming the Georgia-Alabama and Georgia-Florida
boundaries until it joins the Flint River at Chattahoochee, Florida.
The combined waters of these two streams form the Apalachicola River
in Florida.
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE
West Point, Georgia, is the northern-most of five textile towns
in the central Chattahooc.iee Valley; the others are the Alabama towns
of Lanett, Shawmut, Langdale and Fairfax. Less than three miles north
of West Point (at River Mile 308.7*), the Corps of Engineers is
constructing the 5,978-foot-long, 95-foot-high, gravity-type West Point
Dam across the Chattahoochee River (Figures 1 and 2). When completed,
the dam will create the fourth largest impoundment on the Chattahoochee River
and will impound approximately 35 miles of the River, extending from
West Point upstream to Franklin, Georgia. The reservoir will serve the
multiple purpose of power, flood control, navigation, water supply and
recreation (4). The 28,400-acre lake (normal pool) will have more than
500 miles of waterfront shoreline. Principal streams flowing into the
* River mileage given in this paper is an upstream measurement beginning
at the mouth of the Apalachicola River in Florida.
-------
-
Figure 1. The West Point Gravity-type
Dam being constructed in the
Chattahoochee River, Georgia
(mile 308.7-September 1970)
~ W 4
Figure 2.
The Chattahoochee River down-
stream from the West Point Dam
(mile 308.6 - February 1971)
-------
12
reservoir will include the New River and Yellow;}acket and Wehadkee Creeks.
THE STUDY AREA
The preimpoundment study area of the Chattahoochee was from the
City of Franklin to West Point, Georgia (see Figure 3; Location Map
at rear of report). The river is very shallow in the study area
(Figure 4). The riverbed is composed of various combination of silt, clay,
sand and rock, and has an average gradient of 2.1 feet/mile in this
reach. In many place rock riffles cross it completely. The banks of
the main river and its tributaries have a dense cover of foliage making
river access difficult.
WATER SUPPLY
From Franklin, Georgia, downstream to the dam site, the river
has been classified for recreation (5). Within this area, there are
two water intakes. Deering Milliken of LaGrange has an industrial intake
in the main channel of the Chattahoochee River (Figure 5) and the City
of LaGrange a 2 mgd million gallon per day municipal water intake
(Figures 6 and 7).
SOURCES OF WASTES
Within the reservoir drainage basin the chief industries are
agriculture and textile manufacturing. An inventory of industrial
and domestic waste sources showed that three streams will carry major
amounts of wastewater into the proposed reservoir: Yellowjacket
Creek, New River and the Chattahoochee River.
Yellowjacket Creek will enter the impoundment 12.5 miles
upstream from the dam. This creek receives partially treated
-------
I - -- -
13
Figure 4. The shallow Chattahoochee River
near Georgia Highway 109 Bridge
Crossing (mile 316.2 - September 1970)
-------
14
Figure 5. The Deering Milliken Industrial Water
Intake, (mile 321.9 - February 1971)
Figure 6. The "old" City of
LaGrange Municipal Water Intake
on the Shoreline of the Chattahoochee
River, Georgia (mile 323.0 -
February 1971) .
Figure 7. The newly constructed
City of LaGrange Municipal Water
Intake Designed for the Expected
Reservoir Depths (mile 323.0 -
February 1971).
-------
15
municipal wastes from Grantville, Hogansville, and LaGrange (Figures 8 and
9), Georgia, with an estimated biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) waste load
of 650 population equivalents (PE) after treatment (Table I). The
municipal waste at Hogansville includes small quantities of industrial
wastes including that from the U. S. Rubber Company textile plant
(Figure 10).
The New River will enter the impoundment 24.7 miles upstream
from the dam. It receives treated domestic wastewater from Grant-
ville and Newnan with an estimated BOD load of 1,450 PE after treatment
(Table I). The William L. Bennell Company, an aluminum anodizing
industry, discharges inadequately treated wastewater into a tributary
of New River.
The Chattahoochee River is expected to be impounded by the
West Point Dam upstream to mile 343.0 in the vicinity of Franklin,
Georgia. The Franklin Aluminum Company, located in this area,
discharges inadequately treated process wastes to the Chattahoochee
River (Figure 11). The City of Franklin will discharge its treated
waste directly into the impoundment (mile 342.4) about 34 miles
upstream from the dam (Figure 12). Principal waste sources upstream
from Franklin are concentrated in the Atlanta metropolitan area.
Between Buford Dam and the City of Atlanta's Clayton Treatment
Plant, some 50 wastewater treatment facilities with a combined design
capacity of about 8.43 MGD discharge their effluents either directly
to the river or to one of its tributaries (2). Most of these facilities
-------
| |T"
16
Figure 8. Hogansville Road Sewage Treatment Plant,
City of LaGrange.
Figure 9. City of LaGrange, Yellowjacket Creek Sewage
Treatment Plant.
-------
Figure 10. U. S. Rubber Company Textile
Plant at Hogansville, Georgia
-------
Figure 11. The Franklin Aluminum Company on the
Chattahoochee River near Franklin,
Georgia (mile 342.9 - September 1970).
Figure 12. The City of Franklin Sewage Treatment
Plant, (mile 342.4 - February 1971).
-------
19
are small package plants or stabilization ponds serving subdivisions
or apartment complexes. About 90 percent of the wastewater is domestic,
with the remainder being tannery, metal plating and poultry processing
wastes. The two largest domestic facilities are Marietta's 1.5 mgd
trickling filter plant on Sope Creek and the 2.0 mgd trickling filter
plant on Rottenwood Creek.
An additional 0.2 mgd of treated domestic wastes and an undeter-
mined amount of industrial wastes, mostly metals and oils, are dis-
charged to Peachtree Creek, which joins the Chattahoochee River just
downstream from Atlanta's water intake structure and just upstream
from the R. M. Clayton Treatment Plant.
All of these wastewater sources contribute to the conditions
of the Chattahoochee River at mile 408.2. Between river mile 408.2
and 389.4, the City of Atlanta presently operates three wastewater
treatment facilities which provide primary treatment without
disinfection of effluents. These primary plants discharge 280,000 PE
of biochemical oxygen demanding materials (see Table I).
By May 1973 these wastes should be reduced to about 60,000 PE
(plus some allowance for municipal growth) through secondary activated
sludge treatment and disinfection. The R. M. Clayton Plant is under
construction for upgrading to secondary treatment; the Sandy Creek Plant
will be abandoned and its influent will be diverted to the Clayton Plant;
and the Utoy Creek Plant will be upgraded, with construction beginning
November 1971.
Fulton County's treatment plants discharging to the Chattahoochee
-------
20
will also be consolidated and upgraded to secondary treatment with
disinfection. The Big Creek Plant will be expanded from 0.7 to
10 mgd capacity. Construction for this plant will begin November 1971
for completion by January 1973. The presently overloaded March Creek
and Fulco plants will be abandoned. The Camp Creek Plant in south
Fulton County will be upgraded from primary to secondary treatment.
Cobb County's plants on the Chattahoochee will also be consolidated
and upgraded to secondary treatment with disinfection. By May 1973
Cobb County will operate only the new Chattahoochee Plant (presently
overdue on starting construction) and the South Cobb Plant.
By the time Atlanta's Clayton Plant is finished in May 1973, the
most significant pollution to the Chattahoochee from the greater Atlanta
area will be urban surface runoff and combined sewer overflow (by-pass
of treatment plants) during rains.
The importance of pastureland draingage as a waste source was
not overlooked; however, it was omitted from the sanitary inventory
presented in Table I and II because of the difficulty in pinpointing
or defining the impact of this source.
-------
TABLE I
SOURCES OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER *
County, City,
or Subdivision
Sewered
Population
Equivalent
Design
Flow
(mgd)
Treatment
PE Dis-
charged
Receiving Stream
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
Gumming
6,000
0.6
Oxidation Lagoon
1,800
Big Creek
120
Buford
5,000
0.5
Primary
3,500
Suwanee Creek
132
Marietta (Old East)
10,000
1.0
TF + Cl2
1,500
Sope Creek
114.5
Marietta (South)
10,000
1.0
TF + Cl2
1,500
Olley Creek
98
Marietta (Southeast)
20,000
2.0
TF + C12
3,000
Sottenwood Creek
111
Marietta (West)
10,000
1.0
TF + Cl2
1,500
Sope Creek
108
Marietta (New East)
15,000
1.5
TF + Cl2
2,250
Sope Creek
108
Marietta (Sope Creek
Farms)
660
0.066
Activated Sludge
+ ci2
109
Sope Creek
108
Air Force Plant 6 -
Lockheed Ba. Corp.
(Industrial)
30,500
3.5
Chem. Treatment
Nickajack Creek
106
Dobbins AFB (Domestic)
25,000
2.5
TF + Cl2
3,750
Nickajack Creek
106
Church Road
20,000
2.0
TF + Cl2
3,000
Nickajack Creek
106
Smyrna
4,000
0.4
TF + Cl2
600
Bohannon Creek
106
Fulton County (Big
Creek)
7,000
0.7
Activated Sludge
+ ci2
700
Willeo Creek
Camp Creek Plant
25,000
2.5
Primary + Cl2
17,500
Camp Creek
95.1
Cater Creek
Oxidation Lagoon
Cater Creek
Fulco Plant 10.000 1.0
*Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution 1
Primary
Control Facilities,
7,000
Vol. I,
Chattahoochee
Cities and Counties,
102
Georgia
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
Notes: TF - Trickling filter
CI2 - Chlorination
-------
TABLE I (cont'd)
SOURCES OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER*
County, City,
or Subdivision
Sewered Design
Population Flow
Equivalent (mgd) Treatment
PE Dis-
charged Receiving Stream
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
Marsh Creek
7,500
0.75
TF + Cl2
1,225
Chattahoochee
116
Stiibbs Road
Austell
80
5,000
0.008
0.5
Activated
+ ci2
Primary
Sludge
8
3,500
Deep Creek
Sweetwater Creek
98.2
Allyson Park S/D
3,200
0.32
Oxidation
Lagoon
Noses Creek
98.2
Atlanta Country Club
60
0.06
Activated
+ Cl2
Sludge
6
Chattahoochee
Blue Springs Mobile
Home Park
276
0.0207
Activated
+ ci2
Sludge
28
Acworth Lake
Bordeaux Apartments
1,500
0.150
Activated
+ Cl2
Sludge
150
Rottenwood Creek
111
Calloway Acres
470
0.047
Oxidation
Lagoon
Olley Creek
101
Church Road Plant
20,000
2.00
TF + Cl2
3,000
Nickajack Creek
106
Civitania Woods S/D
220
0.022
Oxidation
Lagoon
Nickajack Creek
106
Clarkdale
500
0.050
Primary
350
Sweetwater Creek
98.2
Cobb Gen. Hospital
1,500
0.150
Activated
+ CI2
Sludge
150
Olley Creek
101
Cochise S/D
500
0.050
Activated
+ ci2
Sludge
50
Chattahoochee
Cumberland Apartments
2,977
0.231
Activated
+ Cl2
Sludge
297
Cha t tahoo chee
Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution Control Facilities, Vol. I, Cities and Counties, Georgia
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
-------
TABLE I (cont'd)
SOURCES OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER *
County, City,
or Subdivision
Farmington S/D
Forest Acres S/D
Frontier Trails S/D
Golden Acres
Haven Hill (Mobile Home
Park)
Heritage Hills
Interstate North
Dev. Co.
Kenwood S/D
Maple Valley S/D
Regency Apartments
Riverbend Apartments
Rustic Village S/D
Seven Springs S/D
Sewered Design
Population Flow
Equivalent (mgd)
Treatment
260
260
150
560
640
1,850
700
400
580
3,000
240
500
0.026 Activated Sludge
+ ci2
Oxidation Lagoon
0.026 Oxidation Lagoon
0.015 Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Activated Sludge
0.042 + Cl2
0.064 Oxidation Lagoon
0.140 Activated Sludge
0.07 Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
0.040 Oxidation Lagoon
0.058 Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
0.300 Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
0.024 Oxidation Lagoon
0.050 Activated Sludge
PE Dis-
charged
26
15
56
185
58
300
50
Receiving Stream
Chattahoochee
Cha t taho o chee
Nickajack Creek
Sweetwater
Acworth Lake
Buttermilk Creek
Rottenwood Creek
Nickajack Creek
Nickajack Creek
Rottenwood Creek
Chattahoochee
Olley Creek
Sope Creek
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
106
98.2
111
106
106
111
101
114.5
* Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution Control Facilities, Vol. I, Cities and Counties, Georgia
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
-------
TABLE I (cont'd)
SOURCES OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER*
County, City,
or Subdivision
Shadow Bluff Apts.
South Cobb Plant
Terrell Mill S/D
Tree Top Apartments
Wallace Mobile Home
Park
Waverlv Woods
Westgate S/D and
Country Farm
Windy Hill Village 3,500
Woodland Brook Farms S/D 160
Vinings Height S/D
Douglasville 900
2,400
Atlanta (Clayton) 420,000
Sewered Design
Population Flow
Equivalent (mgd)
20,000
720
1,400
222
200
2.00
0.072
0.140
0.017
0.020
0.350
Treatment
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Aerate Lagoon
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
Oxidation Lagoon
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
0.016 Activated Sludge
0.090 Primary
0.240 Primary
42.000 Aeration +¦ Cl2
PE Dis-
charged
2,000
140
22
20
3 50
16
630
1,680
210,000
Receiving Stream
Chattahoochee
Chattahoochee
Sope Creek
Cha t taho o chee
Chattahoochee
Sewell Mill Creek
Olley Creek
Rottenwood Creek
Chattahoochee
Chattahoochee
Unnamed Stream
Unnamed Stream
Chattahoochee
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
95
114.5
101
111
93
93
107
* Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution Control Facilities, Vol, I, Cities and Counties, Georgia
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
-------
SOURCES OP MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER*
County, City,
or Subdivision
Sewered Design
Population Flow
Equivalent (mgd)
Treatment
PE Dis-
charged
Receiving Stream
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
Atlanta (Sandy Creek)
10,000
1.00
Primary
7,000
Chattahoochee
105
Atlanta (Utoy Creek)
90,000
9.00
Primary
63,000
Utoy Creek
101
Fairburn (Line Creek)
2,200
0.220
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
220
Line Creek
95
Fairburn (Spence Branch)
400
0.040
TF
60
Spence Branch
95
Union City
2,450
0.245
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
245
Deep Creek
95
Palmetto
6,000
0.600
Activated Sludge
+ ci2
600
Town Branch
86
Arnco Mills
7,000
0.700
Primary
4,900
Wahoo Creek
62
Newnan
7,500
0.750
Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
750
Mineral Springs
51 - 70
Newnan
3,500
0.350
Secondary
525
Cotton Mill Branch
Newnan
4,000
0.400
Secondary + Cl2
600
Snake Creek
Newnan
400
0.040
Activated Sludge
+ ci2
40
Sandy Creek
Sargent
600
0.060
Primary
420
Wahoo Creek
62
Grantville
Septic Tank
Yellowjacket Creek
35 - 44
Grantville
Septic Tank
Walnut Creek
* Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution Control Facilities,
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
Vol. I, Cities and Counties, Georgia
-------
County, City,
or Subdivision
Franklin
Hogansville
LaGrange (Shoal Ck.)
LaGrange Blue John
(Sewage)
LaGrange Yellowjacket
LaGrange Blue John
(Industrial)
TABLE I (cont'd)
SOURCES OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION TO THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER*
Sewered Design
Population Flow
Equivalent (mgd) Treatment
850 0.085 Activated Sludge
5,000 0.50 Activated Sludge
+ Cl2
2,500 0.250 TF + Cl2
2,500
10,000
51,000
3.500 TF + Cl2
1.00 TF + Clo
PE Dis-
charged
85
500
375
Receiving Stream
Chattahoochee
Yellowjacket Creek
Shoal Creek
Miles Upstream
From West
Point, Georgia
34
32
19 - 26
2.5
Aeration
375 Blue John Creek (Below Dam)
150 Yellowjacket Creek 32
1,530
(70%) Blue John Creek (Below Dam)
* Data based on Inventory of Water Pollution Control Facilities, Vol. I, Cities and Counties, Georgia
Water Quality Control Board, March 1971.
-------
TABLE II
SOURCES OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION*
Location
Atlanta
Atlanta
Name
Sonoco
Products
Municipal
Incinerator
Type of
Industry
Paper
Repulping
Waste
Incineration
Type of Waste
Process Waste
Non-combustible
Residues
Remarks
Has fiber recovery. Will discharge to
the expanded R. M. Clayton secondary
treatment plant when it becomes
operational.
Discharges to two large settling basins,
cleaned alternately. Elemental analysis
showed (mg/1 of total suspended plus
dissolved fractions): Zinc 2.3, Lead
2.0, Manganese 2.2, Aluminum 31.2, Iron
>6.2.
Newnan
Wm. L.
Bennell Co.
Aluminum
Anodizing
Acid, Cr, A1
Waste treatment is inadequate. Has
an equalization pond, but acid dis-
charges still occur. Effect on
receiving creek is severe but effect
on Chattahoochee is difficult to
measure.
Newnan
Franklin
Ga. Power Co.
(Yates Plant)
Franklin
Aluminum Co.
Electrical
Generators
Aluminum
Anodizing
Hot Water
Acid, Cr, A1
Has no cooling towers, will be in
violation if Ga. water quality standards
are changed to allow a 5°F maximum
temperature rise.
Waste treatment is inadequate. Not
in compliance with Ga. Water Quality
Control Board.
* Information supplied by Georgia Water Quality Control Board
NJ
•vl
-------
28
STUDY METHODS
SAMPLING STATIONS
Thirteen sampling stations were established for the study on
the Chattahoochee River and its principal tributaries between
Franklin and West Point, Georgia. Eight stations were established
in the main river channel; the remaining five were in the tribu-
taries along this 35-mile stretch of the Chattahoochee.
Chemical, biological and bacteriological sampling sites coin-
cided as closely as was physically possible. Cross-section samples
at third points were collected at all the Chattahoochee River sites
except Station 7. In the tributaries and at Station 7 mid-channel
samples were taken. During the summer reconnaissance it was
determined that sufficient mixing precluded the need for more than
one sample. All water samples were collected at a depth of one
foot. The location of these sampling stations is shown in Figure 3
(end of report). A description of the locations is presented in
Appendix B.
SAMPLING SCHEDULE
Originally, two sampling periods were selected for this study.
Based on previous weather records, a late summer period (August 10-21,
1970) was established to determine conditions of low-flow, warm
temperature, and a winter period (February 17-25, 1971) to determine
conditions of high-flow, cold temperature. Because of unseasonable
-------
29
rainfall it was necessary to collect samples at three summer
intervals (August 11-14; September 3-4; and September 14-18, 1970)
to obtain adequate seasonal data.
Water samples for physical, chemical and bacteriological analyses
were collected daily. A diurnal study at selected stations was con-
ducted on September 17, 1970. Grab sampling techniques (one sample
per day per station) were used for daily collections and hourly
sampling was done for the diurnal study. Time of the daily sampling
was staggered in order to complement the diurnal study. Samples for
biological analyses were limited to an investigation per station
per seasonal study.
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES
Measurements and analyses were performed either immediately
upon collection at the sampling site, within a few hours of collec-
tion at the mobile laboratory in LaGrange, Georgia (Figure 13), or
at the Southeast Water Laboratory in Athens, Georgia. The parameter
studied, frequency of measurement and location where analysis was
performed are presented in Table III.
The U. S. Geological Survey supplied flow measurements from
their Chattahoochee River gage (mile 306.7).
BIOLOGICAL ANALYSES
For plankton analysis, surficial grab samples of water were
collected twice at each station in the summer and once per station
-------
Figure 13. The Southeast Water Laboratory Mobile
Unit at LaGrange, Georgia
-------
31
TABLE til
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSES
Parameter
Frequency Of
Measurement
Where
Determined
Physical
Temperature
Color
Turbidity
PH
Conductivity
Chemical
Total Dissolved Solids
Suspended Solids
Dissolved Oxygen
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Alkalinity
Chloride
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Total Organic Carbon
Manganese
Iron
Daily & Diurnal
Daily
Daily
Daily & Diurnal
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily & Diurnal
Selected Times
Daily & Diurnal
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Field
Mobile Lab
Mobile Lab
Field & Mobile
Lab
Mobile Lab
Athens, Georgia
Athens, Georgia
Mobile Lab
Mobile Lab
Mobile Lab
Mobile Lab
Athens, Georgia
Athens, Georgia
Athens, Georgia
Athens, Georgia
Athens, Georgia
-------
32
in the winter. Total phytoplankton counts (number/ml) were deter-
mined in the Southeast Water Laboratory.
Artificial substrate samplers were used to collect periphyton
(Figure 14) and macroinvertebrates (Figure 15). Dipnet collections
were made at each station for additional qualitative information.
Analysis was done at the Southeast Water Laboratory.
BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES
All bacteriological samples were collected at a depth of
approximately one foot using a grab technique. Samples were placed
in ice and analyses were initiated within six hours after collection.
Total coliform densities were determined using the membrane
filter technique as outlined in Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater 13th Edition (7). The fecal coliform densi-
ties were determined using the membrane filter procedure of Geldreich
et W (which employs M-FC broth and an incubation temperature of
44.5°C).
Qualitative determinations for the presence of Salmonella were
made at selected stations using the modified swab technique of Moore.
(9) The swabs were suspended just beneath the water surface for a
3-5 day period, retrieved, placed in sterile plastic bags and returned
to the laboratory for analysis. Swabs were placed into wide-mouth jars
containing approximately 200 ml of 1 1/2 strength Tetrathionate Broth
with brilliant green added (1:100,000 w/v). The inoculated enrichment
was incubated for 18 to 24 hours at 41.5°C according to the procedure
of Spino.(lO)
-------
33
9ta>
Figure 14. Artificial Substrate Used to Collect
Periphyton.
Figure 15. Artificial Substrate Used to Collect
Macroinvertebrates.
-------
34
After primary enrichment, an inoculum was streaked onto Bismuth
Sulfite Agar (BS), XLD Agar, Taylor (XLD), and Hektoen Enteric Agar
(HE) plates and incubated at 35°C for 18-24 hours. Suspected
Salmonella colonies were picked from the respective plates and
subjected to the identification scheme outlined in Table IV.
The methods and media outlined in Table IV are described by
Ewing,(11) with the exception of the cytochrome oxidase and lysine
decarboxylase methods. Oxidase and decarboxylase activity was
determined using Patho-Tec-CO and Patho-Tec-LD* reagent impreg-
nated paper strips respectively.
Definitive serological identification of Salmonella isolates
was made at the Southeast Water Laboratory. The methodology used
was the standard serological procedures described by Edwards and
Ewing.(12) Verification of these identifications was made by the
Enteric Bacteriology Unit of the National Center for Disease Control,
Atlanta.
* Does not imply endorsement of this product.
-------
35
TABLE IV
IDENTIFICATION SCHEME FOR SALMONELLA SUSPECTS
Suspect colony (picked from differential plate)
1
Lysine Iron Agar
Alkaline slant and butt
with or without H2S
Acid slant and butt; Alkaline slant
and acid butt - DISCARDED
Urease Production
Positive
DISCARDED
Negative
Cytochrome
Oxidase
Positive
DISCARDED
Negative
Lactose; Sodium Malonate; Potassium Cyanide, Indole
Positive
DISCARDED
Negative
Lysine decarboxylase; Citrate, ^S, Motility
Negative
DISCARDED
Positive
Polyvalent 0 Antisera
Positive
Serological Identification
Negative
DISCARDED
Verification by NCDC
-------
36
STUDY FINDINGS
PREVIOUS STUDIES
In 1964, 1965 and 1966 some water quality data were collected
by the U.S. Public Health Service in the Chattahoochee River Basin.
Ten sampling sites were included in the area to be impounded by the
West Point Dam. Data are in the form of "STORET" printouts depicting
bacteriological, physical and chemical measurements (Appendix C).
The bacteriological data are adequate for the periods and locations
studied; however, data on most of the physical and chemical parameters
are insufficient for comparison with postimpoundment conditions.
In January 1970, the Georgia Water Quality Control Board published
data from their Chattahoochee River monitoring program for the calendar
years of 1968 and 1969.(2) These chemical, physical and bacteriologi-
cal data are based on monthly grab samples from eight sites in the
Chattahoochee between Atlanta and Franklin, Georgia. Dissolved
oxygen and fecal coliform profiles from that program are repro-
duced here as Figures 16 and 17.
In 1965, a U.S. Public Health Service investigation briefly
described the biological quality of the river and selected tribu-
taries. (3) The report included two stations in this preimpound-
ment study area: Station 9 and 12. Excerpts can be found in
Appendix D.
-------
FIGURE 16
10 r-
DISSOLVED OXYGEN PROFILES UPSTREAM FROM WEST POINT SITE
(FROM GEORGIA WATER QUALITY BOARO)
J i L
L_
KEY
STAT
RM.
STAT
R.M.
•
-•
Mean (1968 Data)
X
408. Z
e
389.4
§¦
Minimum (1968 Data)
X1
406.4
YL
368.4
o
-o
Mean (1969 Data)
m
403.5
Tar
368.4
o
-o
Minimum (1969
TZ
394.9
urn
366.2
"O"*
_L_
i n m
JSC
•bl m
STATIONS
T7TH
-------
FIGURE 17
FECAL COLIFORM -GEOMETRIC MEANS
UPSTREAM FROM WEST POINT SITE
(FROM GEORGIA WATER QUALITY BOARD)
"• Mean (1968 Data)
"O Minimum (1969 Data)
STATIONS
-------
39
1970-1971 STUDIES
Survey data from the summer and winter preimpoundment studies
are discussed together in this section to facilitate comparisons.
A tabulation of certain statistical values for the water quality
parameters measured is presented in Appendices E and F.
RAINFALL AND RIVERFLOW
Annual precipitation in the study area is 55.61 inches. Distri-
bution is relatively even throughout the winter, spring and summer
months. Records show 28 to 29 percent of the rain falls during
each of these seasons. The dry period is autumn when about 15
percent of the total rainfall occurs.
During the August survey, rainstorms slightly elevated the
riverflow. Turbidity fluctuations and other problems associated
with rainfall and runoff resulted in the postponement of the second
week of the summer, low-water level, study until September. Minor
showers occurred during the other survey periods but they caused
no major problems. Daily rainfall data for the summer and winter
survey periods are presented in Table V.
River discharge was measured by a Corps of Engineers gage on
Highway 27 near Franklin, and a USGS gage at Highway 29 near West
Point, Georgia. Figure 18 shows that streamflows in August and Sept-
ember were very close to the annual average flow of 4000 cfs, in spite
of the unseasonable rainfall. Flows during the winter survey were
far above the average flow. Large weekly fluctuations during the low
water study were closely correlated with dam releases from upstream
reservoirs.
-------
40
CORRELATIONS OF FLOW WITH WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Fluctuations in several parameter concentrations appear to corre-
late closely to streamflow fluctuations. The mechanism involved is
presumably suspension of sediment or flushing of land surface and
isolated bodies of water. Parameters that matched flow variations
fairly closely include: turbidity, total iron, total solids, dissolved
solids, total phosphates, total manganese, total organic carbon and —
to a slight extent — chlorides (Appendices E and F).
Both total and fecal coliforms (as shown for Station 12 in
Figure 18a) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (Appendices E and F) matched flow
to some extent, yet showed independent variations also. Ammonia concen-
trations increased with initial rises in stream flow and then
dropped quicker, or to a greater extent, than did streamflow. This
could be contributed to the scrubbing effect of the atmosphere by
heavy rains. Dilution had apparently become significant after initial
flushing.
In terms of total quantities of pollutants discharged, those
whose concentrations increased with flow were even more significant.
Or, illustrating this point in a different way: Figure 18a shows
concentration of fecal coliform on February 23 and 25 of 21,000 and
33,500 per 100 ml, respectively. However, in terms of total quantities
(the products of flow and concentrations); the February 23 data repre-
sents a 25 percent greater amount than does February 25.
-------
FIGURE 18
STREAM FLOW DURING THE SURVEY PERIODS
KEY
I, On nil Sarwy Q*««)
l«Mr DMr (970)
I I 3 4 9 « 7 • » tO II 12 IS M 19 IS >7 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 292930 31 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 9 10 II 12 13 *4 * 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 2S 27 2ft 29 30 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 ft Oil 12 13 K 15 «6 17 « 19 20 21 22 23 24 29 2* 27 29 29 30 31
AUGUST, 1970 SEPTEMBER, 1970 FEBRUARY, 1971
-------
FIGURE ISA
COLIFORM COUNTS (AVERAGE OF LEFT AND RIGHT BANKS)
OF STATION 12 AT FRANKLIN, GEORGIA
870,000#
770,000
/
/ 300,000
290
40
200
in
® ISO
24
j£Y
VUlAl A ¦ Ifi-1 ,
I0NN MDratM
Foool Conforms
100
o
o-
50
20
24
SEPTEMBER, 1970
-------
TABLE V
RAINFALL DATA*
(Inches)
Day
of
Month August 1970 September 1970 February 197I
10 0 0
2 0.09 0 0
3 0 0.60 0
4 0.13 0 0.35
5 0.43 0.04 0.85
6 0 0.25 0
7 0.17 0.11 1.03
8 0 0.80 0.80
9 0.05 0 0
10 0.95 0 0
11 0.48 0 0
12 T 0 0
13 0.20 0 0.52
14 0 0 1.63
15 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
17 0 0 0
18 0 0 0
19 0.09 0 0
20 0.48 0 0.74
21 0.28 T 0.34
22 T 0 1.25
23 0 0 0.05
24 0.47 0 0
25 0 0 0
26 0 0 0
27 0 0 0.83
28 0.10 0 0
29 0.05 0
30 0 0
31 0
* From the National Climatic Center, LaGrange, Georgia.
T represents a trace measurement for rainfall.
-------
44
TEMPERATURE
The study area is located in a temperate climate characterized
by short, mild winters and long, warm summers. Extremes include
temperatures approaching zero in winter and summer heat waves approach-
ing 100°F.
Water temperatures reflected the seasonal air temperature
changes and to a lesser degree the summer shading effect of over-
hanging shoreline vegetation. Water temperature in the main
Chattahoochee channel had the most variation. Measured temperatures
ranged from 21 to 28°C in summer and from 10 to 15.5°C in winter.
Shallow tributaries that were heavily shaded during the summer had
slightly lower water temperatures, measurements ranged from 21.5 to
26°C. In the winter the water temperature in the shallow tributaries
was closely correlated with changing air temperatures. Measured
temperatures ranged from 8 to 15.5°C (Figure 19).
COLOR AND TURBIDITY
The Chattahoochee River and its tributaries, the New River,
Yellowjacket Creek and Wehadkee Creek, from mile 343.1 to 306.7 were
low in color. Values ranged from 10 to 50 units* at all stations
during both warm and cold weather phases of the study. Water color
was caused by both organic and inorganic sources. This judgement
was based upon the fact that humic materials were observed in abun-
* One exception - a value of 65 color units was recorded in Yellow-
jacket Creek at Station 8 on February 23, 1971.
-------
30*
U 28
o
Ul
p 26
2
£ 24
2
Ui
»- 22
AUGUST, 1970
20
FIGURE 19
AVERAGE WATER TEMPERATURE DURING SURVEY PERIODS
SEPTEMBER, (970
W 24
J L
J L
3 4 5 6
10 II
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
CJ
o
UJ
oc
Z3
<
a:
ui
a
2
Ui
i-
FEBRUARY, 1971
KEY
| | TEMPERATURE OF CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
H TEMPERATURE OF TRIBUTARIES
-------
46
ance in the river and tributaries and inorganic sources such as
iron and manganese compounds were present in excessive amounts also.
Suspended silt, clay, and finely divided organic matter made
the river generally turbid. The phytoplankton population was sparse
and contributed little to the turbidity values observed. The amount
of turbidity fluctuated depending on stream flow and meteorological
conditions. Rainstorms that delayed the summer sampling reflected
themselves in maximum turbidity values of 125 Jackson Candle units.
In the winter, during high-flows, turbidity values reached maximums
of 250 Jackson Candle units. Normally, values were less than 50
Jackson units in the summer but were nearly doubled in the winter.
pH, CONDUCTIVITY AND SOLIDS
The pH values never varied more than 0.7 of a pH unit from neut-
rality. In highly productive waters, high pH values often occur as
the photosynthetic process of aquatic plants converts carbonate to
carbon dioxide thus increasing the hydoxide content. The lack of
a diurnal pH elevation in the Chattahoochee River and its tributaries
suggests that photosynthetic activity was insufficient to cause such
an equilibrium shift.
Low conductivity values were recorded at all stations during
both survey period. Wehadkee Creek (Station 4) had the lowest
dissolved mineral content as reflected by its conductivity measure-
ments (summer 44 to 69; winter 26 to 42 ymhos/cm). Elsewhere, average
warm weather measurements ranged, from 57 to 84 ymhos/cm while average
-------
cold weather results were lower, 33 to 59 pmhos. The slightly
lower values In Wehadkee Creek indicated that it was the only stream
under study that was not receiving an industrial or domestic waste
load.
Total dissolved solids were low but variable. In August and
early September 1970, intermittent rainstorms and upstream reservoir
releases caused unstable streamflow. These conditions were reflected
in the wide range of dissolved solid values, from 9 to 172 mg/1. The
third warm weather study, September 14-18, 1970, was conducted while
more stable streamflow conditions prevailed, and dissolved solids
ranged from 8 to 81 mg/1. These data were more characteristic of
the solids content to be expected during a warm, dry period. In
February 1971, streamflows fluctuated widely, and the dissolved
solids ranged from 27 to 128 mg/1 which was a smaller range than
during the first summer-study period.
Suspended solids somewhat paralleled the dissolved solids.
During the summer rainy period, suspended solids ranged from 19
to 90 mg/1. Cold weather samples reflected unstable streamflow
conditions with range values of 2 to 874 mg/1.
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
In view of the considerable amounts of waste entering the
Chattahoochee River (Tables I and II), the dissolved oxygen (DO)
and five-day biochemical oxygen demand (B0D5) were significant
parameters.
-------
48
The DO and BOD^ values obtained in the August and the early
September study were not representative of low-water, warm weather
conditions. Heavy rainfall and frequent water level fluctuations
because of the upstream reservoir releases caused as much as a
1.0 mg/1 increase in the DO and caused a modification in the BOD5
results. The data show a slight DO depression at Station 12 (4.5
mg/1) when compared to samples collected downstream (range: 5.0-
8.0 mg/1). The mid-September study was done during a representative
period of relatively warm weather with stable low-water conditions.
Dissolved oxygen values as low as 3.4 mg/1 were recorded at
Station 12 in mid-September (43 percent saturation). Downstream
measurements showed the riverwater was being reaerated. Summer DO
content of samples from Station 10 and downstream ranged from 5.0
to 8.8 mg/1; no values less than 62 percent of saturation was record-
ed. The September studies also showed that the BOD5 was being diluted
and/or assimilated with downstream water travel. Average BOD5 values
of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/1 at Stations 12A and 12B, respectively, were reduc-
ed to 0.7 and 0.4 mg/ at Stations 10A and 10B, respectively. Values
continued at these concentrations (or slightly less) downstream.
The cold weather survey was done at approximately the annual
peak flow period. High streamflow and the increased solubility of
oxygen in cold water resulted in DO concenrations at all stations
ranging from 4.6 to 11.5 mg/1. The BOD5 values increased during
the unstable, high-water conditions to a high of 5.7 mg/1.
-------
49
ALKALINITY
Total alkalinity concentrations did not exceed 36 mg/1 as CaCO^
and the average value for most stations was about 15 mg/1 as CaCOj.
This low buffering capacity existed during both seasonal studies.
Hardness was not measured, but previous records of the Georgia
Water Quality Control Board showed that a close correlation between
alkalinity and hardness existed in the Chattahoochee River(13). Thus
suggested that most water hardness in the basin is carbonate hardness.
CHLORIDE
Chloride values were far below concentrations likely to cause
a problem in the proposed reservoir. Measurements ranged from 2 to
10 mg/1.
NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS
Much research has been directed at the importance of major
nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus (or their components)
in promoting vegetative production. Nitrogen analyses made in this
study included the measurement of ammonia, (NH3), nitrite + nitrate
(NO2+NO3) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). Results showed
organic nitrogen (TKN minus NH^) and inorganic (NH^ plus NO2 and NO3)
nitrogen levels were appreciably lower in the summer than in the
winter. Summer concentrations of organic and inorganic nitorgen
ranged from 0.118 to 0.240 mg/1 and from 0.341 to 1.206 mg/1,
respectively. The summer data reflected utilization by plant growth;
none of the values are abnormal for surface waters in this section
of the United States.
-------
50
Phosphorus analyses included a measurement of total and soluble
phosphorus. Results Indicated a slight seasonal variation in total
phosphorus levels. Summer results, in the main river channle, ranged
from 0.17 to 0.76 mg/1 while winter results ranged from 0.15 to 0.98
mg/1. Tributaries generally had lower concentrations (e.g., 0.01 to
0.08 mg/1 in Wehadkee Creek). The upper limit of the ranges recorded
for the river were in excess of suggested allowable limits (0.1 mg/1
in flowing streams and 0.05 mg/1 P where waters enter a lake) (14).
Although nuisance phytoplankton growths were absent in 1970 and 1971,
there is a possibility that they may occur in the impoundment. Of
course, nutrients are necessary for high fish production and this
benefit must be balanced against other disadvantages.
TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON
The importance of organic compounds in plant nutrition is not
well known. Certain plants and animals are thought to utilize simple
organic compounds such as dissolved carbon, while bacteria are capable
of utilizing the more complex forms. In spite of incomplete knowledge
about the nutritional role of carbonaceous materials, excessive
amounts have been associated with nuisance growths and other water
pollution problems.
Water samples from the proposed impoundment watershed were
tested for total organic carbon content (TOC). The highest sumner-
time TOC value, 13.0 mg/1, was recorded in August at Station 6 in the
Chattahoochee River at the mouth of Yellowjacket Creek. In the past,
-------
Yellowjacket Creek had received a substantial amount of untreated
or partly treated domestic and textile industry wastes. At present
most of these wastes are treated, and TOC values reflect the
improved water quality conditions. Other summertime TOC values
ranged from 2 to 11 mg/1. The winter survey results were similar.
Ranges in TOC were 1 to 14 mg/1. Presently, these values seem to
be causing some problems. At Station 6 and in Yellowjacket Creek,
August data showed that 71 to 92 percent of the attached algae
(by number) were filamentous blue-greens. A similar, but unexplained
condition existed in Wehadkee Creek where maximum TOC values reached
10.0 mg/1. If upstream wasteloading is continued, an imbalance in
nutrients will occur and nuisance blue-green algae growths can be
expected.
IRON AND MANGANESE
Trace metals such as iron, manganese, molybdenum, cobalt, zinc,
etc. are present in all natural waters and are required in small
amounts in the metabolic process of plants. Iron and manganese are
of special concern in impoundment waters because of their potential
increase in solubility under reducing (anaerobic) conditions, resulting
in a build-up of dissolved forms. The dissolved forms, if excessive,
produce an objectionable taste, stain laundry, support undesirable
bacterial growths (i.e., from iron bacteria), and generally deterio-
rate water quality.
The multiple water uses planned for the Chattahoochee River
within and downstream from the West Point Lake include municipal
-------
52
potable water supply and process water supply for the textile industry.
It is desirable for municipal supplies that both iron and manganese
levels, in the dissolved form, remain at very low concentrations (<0.3
mg/1 for iron and <0.05 mg/1 for manganese in finished water) so as not
to interfere with consumer use.
In the summer, particulate iron values averaged from 1.453 to
5.530 mg/1 and particulate manganese averaged from 0.117 to 0.232
mg/1. Winter values were generally higher and averaged from 1.200
to 14.290 mg/1 for iron and from 0.030 to 0.430 mg/1 for manganese.
The highest value for particulate iron (73.0 mg/1) was found in
near flood conditions in February, and probably represents suspended
sediment. Much of this may become soluablized during and after
impoundment.
Dissolved fractions of these metals generally followed a similar
trend, that is, cold weather averages were generally higher. How-
ever, the highest single sample concentrations for dissolved iron
(0.8 mg/1) and dissolved manganese (0.440 mg/1) were recorded in
September at Station 2 — below the dam site — and Station 4 in
Wehadkee Creek, respectively. These values exceeded concentrations
levels suggested as maximums for potable and textile-process water
use. It is essential that the Corps of Engineers in cooperation with
appropriate state agencies maintain surveillance of these parameters
as the reservoir is filled and after impoundment, because the preimpound-
ment levels indicate water quality problems are probable in the pro-
posed lake.
-------
53
DIURNAL STUDIES
An intensive sampling schedule was established for one day
during the summer study. Four stations (5, 6, 10, 12) were sampled
hourly from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Samples were analysed for pH,
alkalinity, DO and temperature. In conjunction with other grab
sample data, these hourly analyses were useful in developing a repres-
entative record of quality. Diurnal variations for each parameter
are graphically shown in Figure 20. More detailed data are given
in Appendix B.
PHYTOPLANKTON
Nutrients in the Chattahoochee River were obviously being assim-
ilated by plant forms other than phytoplankton. The total population
of the free-floating algae did not exceed 600 cells/ml. In the late
summer study, the population values ranged from 33 to 495 cell per
milliliter. Winter study ranges from 80 to 583 cells per milliliter.
With such low densities, seasonal variations were not clear. The
summer and winter plankton data are graphically compared in Figure 21.
More detailed phytoplankton data are presented in Appendix H.
PERIPHYT0N
Study of the periphyton community revealed that the river's
greenish discoloration was due to masses of attached algae often
referred to as periphyton. The algal coating of submerged rocks
generally decreased from station-to-station downstream. Table VI
shows the relative abundance and biowass of periphyton in the study
area.
Comparison of summer and winter data clearly showed seasonal
variation. In late summer, the nuisance-producing blue-green algae
-------
FIGURE 20
AVERAGE HOURLY QUALITY VARIATIONS AT STATIONS 5,6,10812
SEPTEMBER 17,1970
V\
w
A
\ ^ \ i
TEMP
FLOW
00 .000 .300 ,600 .900 0700 K>00 .300 1600 .900 0700 .000 .3M 16^ .4) 0700 lolx) ,3^0 ,600
STATION 5
STATION 6
STATION 10
STATION 12
-------
FIGURE 21
COMPARISON OF AVERAGE TOTAL PHYTOPLANKTON POPULATIONS
(SUMMER AND WINTER SURVEY PERIODS)
600
550
500
450
400
350
KEY
SUMMER 1970 VALUES
(Averaged from Replicates)
WINTER 1971 VALUES
(Single Samples)
300
< 250
200
ISO
J 00
50 '
STATIONS
-------
56
TABLE VI
Comparison of Average Biomass and Relative Abundance of
Periphyton in the Summer 1970 and Winter 1971
(West Point Preimpoundment Survey)
Biomass Abundance
Station * Cgm/™2 ash free dry weight) (number of cells/mm )
Summer Winter Summer Winter
IL
24.88615
0.00261
2,041
1,132
IR
4.48000
0.01248
965
1,061
2L
no sample
0.00931
no sample
5,599
2R
12.81846
0.00199
22
3,447
3L
0.84293
0.00144
312
673
3R
32.62153
0.00052
531
288
4
5.97230
no sample
676
no sample
5L
23.26769
0.00253
1,064
2,784
5R
87.58769
0 .00143
411
2,605
6L
13.07384
0.00088
543
43
6R
25.33230
0.00590
224
7,073
7
1.99692
no sample
408
no sample
8
no sample
no sample
no sample
no sample
9
13.22153
0.00155
335
325
10L
8.96923
0.00629
no sample
463
10R
1.55384
0.00743
648
309
11
2.55076
0.00618
14
1,114.
12L
8.70153
0.00476
263
535
12R
127.12000
0.01868
89
1,627
13
6.32307
0.06925
353
540
* L represents left shore facing upstream.
* R represents right shore facing upstream.
-------
57
dominated certain stations (Table VII). Winter samples showed diatoms
were dominate (Table VIII). This cyclic trend is normal, but the
amount of periphyton build-up reflected very nutrient rich waters.
-------
Table VII 58
Periphyton Population at Sampling Stations
in the Chattahoochee River and Tributaries
ALGAE (number per mm^)
SAMPLE
TOTAL
BLUE. GREEN
GREEN
FLACFI
LATES
DIATOMS
INERT DIATOM
LOCATION
ALGAE
(pigmented)
SHEL
LS
s
to
3
O
CO
3
O
• i
o
¦H
¦Ul
0)
U
CO
Depth
Coccoid
4J
c
CD
s
CO
r-H
•H
Coccoid
4-J
£
§
(0
i—4
*r4
fcn
Green
Other
Centric
Pennate
Centric
Pennate
IR
Surf
965
0
0
3
7
0
0
13
942
4
125
1L
It
2,041
0
0
24
3
0
0
23
1,991
6
188
2R
II
22
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
12
1
6
2L
fl
no sample
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3R
II
531
2
0
0
0
0
0
69
460
17
153
3L
II
312
14
49
2
6
0
0
8
233
5
75
4
91
676
0
657
0
0
0
0
1
18
0
7
5R
If
411
0
114
4
130
0
0
15
148
7
98
5L
If
1,064
0
58
7
35
0
0
14
950
3
631
6R
If
224
0
158
0
37
0
0
10
19
1
18
6L
II
543
0
75
4
0
0
0
9
455
2
129
7
IV
408
0
77
4
0
0
0
2
325
0
113
8
II
no sample
-
-
-
-
"
-
-
-
-
-
-------
SAMPLE
LOCATION
TOTAL
ALGAE
§
c
o
vJ
U
(8
•M
CO
o.
dJ
a
9
10R
10L
11
12R
12L
13
Surf
14
648
no sample
14
89
263
353
Con't
59
FLAGELLATES
(pigmented)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DIATOMS
0
2
13
0
INERT DIATOM
SHELLS
10
64
250
347
0
0
2
0
6
3
84
54
-------
TABLE VIII
PERIPHYTON POPULATION AT SAMPLING STATIONS IN THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
(February 1971)
60
ALGAE (number per mm^)
SAMPLE
TOTAL
BLUE. GREEN
GREEN
FLAGELLATES
DIATOMS
INERT DIATOM
LOCATION
ALGAE
(pigme
nted)
SHELLS
o
Z
CO
3
o
<0
3
O
¦ 1
Station
Depth
-o
•rl
o
o
o
c
-------
SAMPLE
LOCATION
e
o
T-l
u
to
u
GO
10L
11
12R
12L
13
- Cotlt
61
flageliates
(pigmented)
u
o
0
0
0
0
Q
DIATCMS
o
•rA
U
U
c
(U
o
5
0
0
15
Q
(0
c
c
-------
62
MACROINVERTEBRATES
Seasonal succession, water velocity and pollution were found to
be three major factors that caused differences in the Chattahoochee
River invertebrate community.
Seasonal distribution studies (15)(16)(17) have shown that there
is no growing season common to all invertebrates, but generally
populations are more diverse in the winter. Summer and winter popula-
tions are recorded in Appendix I.
The importance of water velocity on the invertebrate community
was demonstrated by placing artificial substrates in pools and near
riffles. Invertebrates collected in the pooled areas consisted almost
entirely of midges and worms. In swift current areas, a diverse
fauna of insects, crustaceans, molluscs, and worms were found in the
substrate samplers. It was thought this information would be useful
in predicting population changes when the river becomes impounded.
Further discussion on this topic follows in the section titled, "Environ-
mental Changes Following Impoundment."
Pollution from Atlanta's waters formed sludge beds downstream that
covered portions of the Chattahoochee River's natural bottom. Profuse
numbers of sludge worms were found in this deposit. Near the Highway
92 between Fairburn and Douglasville bridge, the sludge worm population
was so dense that it gives a reddish-color to the river's shoreline.(18)
Predatory leeches that feed on the worms abounded in the river near
this bridge. The food web was simple — organic materials were consumed
by worms and the worms were eaten by leeches. As the food supply
diminished, the leech population decreased. Comparison of the summer
study biotic data from Station 12 with downstream stations showed this
pattern of a decreasing leech population (Figure 22). During these
-------
FIGURE 22
RELATIVE DENSITY OF CERTAIN INVERTEBRATES AT EACH STATION DURING
THE SUMMER SURVEY
#
2 l
>
QC
LU
UJ
X
o
o
o
X
<
<
X
o
Annelida
y.-l insects
NOTE:
This Schematic Not To Scale
SOUTHEAST WATER LABORATORY
ATHENS GEORGIA
WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER QUALITY OFFICE
SOUTHEAST REGION ATLANTA,GEORGIA
-------
/.i-^-'fe-------"-^^-— -¦ :- - —— '• .-^aa^s^ -- '
FIGURE 22A
RELATIVE DENSITY OF CERTAIN INVERTEBRATES AT EACH STATION DURING
THE WINTER SURVEY
oa
UJ
>
en
UJ
UJ
I
o
o
0
X
-------
65
summer studies, a substrate sampler at Station 12 contained 143
organisms. Of these, 122 or 85 percent were leeches. This and
other biotic data indicated Station 12 was a pollutional recovery
area. About 10 miles downstream, another sampler (Station 10) con-
tained 105 organisms and only 13 percent were leeches which indicated
a relatively clean water zone.
Pollution is rarely reflected by the presence of absence of a
single species or group. Yet in this study, the summer leech popula-
tion clearly delineated the pollutional effect from Atlanta's industrial
and municipal wastes. Winter time scouring and the dilution of wastes
by the high water altered invertebrate populations making the pollution
pattern indefinite.
COLIFORM BACTERIA
A total of 320 bacteriological samples were collected and analyzed
for total and fecal coliform bacteria densities. These results are
summarized in Table IX and graphically presented in Figures 23, 24 and
25.
The bacteriological quality of the Chattahoochee River within the
study area was adversely affected by wastes being charged from the greater
Atlanta area. The uppermost river station (Station 12, mile 343.1) had
the highest mean total and fecal coliform densities throughout the studies.
(Table IX and Figures 23 and 24.)
Additional waste from land runoff and treated domestic wastes from
the City of LaGrange's Yellowjacket Waste Treatment Plant entered the
river at mile 321.9. The steady decrease in the total and fecal coliform
levels continued at the stations downstream of Franklin, Georgia (Station
12). (Figures 23 and 24.)
-------
66
TABLE IX
BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA SUMMARY
Total . Fecal Number of
Station Coliforms/100 ml— Coliforms/100 ml— Determinations
1A*
17,000
820
16
IB*
18,000
1,000
17
2A
10,000
620
12
2B
10,000
820
12
3A
12,000
710
12
3B
9,800
560
11
4
2,000
200
17
5A
24,000
1,700
17
5B
25,000
1,600
16
6A
35,000
3,000
16
6B
35,000
2,400
16
7
44,000
2,900
16
8
17,000
1,800
16
9
4,200
600
16
10A
46,000
2,700
16
1QB
38,000
3,100
16
11
3,800
540
16
12A
60,000
5,100
16
12B
66,000
5,100
16
13
1,500
220
16
_1/ Geometric Mean
* A - right bank looking upstream; B - left bank looking upstream.
-------
FIGURE 23
GEOMETRIC MEAN TOTAL COLIFORM DENSITIES
AT THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER STATIONS
[New River
Yellowjacket Creek
Wehadkee Creeki
NOTE: STATION LOCATIONS NOT TO SCALE
SCALE
SOUTHEAST WATER LABORATORY
2,000
GEORGIA
ATHENS
1,000-
WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT STJUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER QUALITY OFFICE
ATLANTA .GEORGIA
FECAL COUFORMS /100 ml.
SOUTHEAST REGION
-------
FIGURE 24
GEOMETRIC MEAN FECAL COLIFORM DENSITIES
AT THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER STATIONS
New River
Yelfowjacket Creek
Wehadkee Creekj
West Point Dai
NOTE: STATION LOCATIONS NOT TO SCALE
SCALE
SOUTHEAST WATER LABORATORY
2,000
GEORGIA
1,000-
WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER QUALITY OFFICE
SOUTHEAST REGION
FECAL COLIFORMS /100 ml.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA
-------
100,000
FIGURE 25
GEOMETRIC MEAN TOTAL AND FECAL COLIFORM DENSITIES
AT THE TRIBUTARY STATIONS
KEY
10,000
STATIONS
-------
70
Using the geometric mean total and fecal coliform densities
at Station 12 to represent a theoretical 100 percent of the indicator
organisms entering the study area, a 70 percent reduction in total
coliform density and 80 percent reduction in fecal coliform density
occurred between this station and Station 1 (mile 306.7) at West
Point (Figure 26). The reduction in indicator densities should be
much greater after impoundment because of the cumulative effect of
dilution, settling and increased time of flow from the upper reaches of
the impoundment to the dam site.
That portion of the river within the study area is classified by
the State of Georgia for recreational use. The present bacteriological
standard for recreational waters adopted by the State of Georgia is a
monthly arithmetic mean of 1000 fecal coliforms per 100 ml. This stand-
ard is presently under review by the Environmental Protection Agency as
being too permissive. The National Technical Advisory Conmittee has
recommended a bacteriological criterion for primary contact recreational
waters not to exceed a log mean of 200 fecal coliforms per 100 ml.
The mean fecal coliform densities at every river station above
Station 3(mile 309.2) were in violation of the present recommended
recreational standard 100 fecal coliforms per 100 ml (Table IX). After
impoundment, assuming the proposed treatment facilities in Atlanta
are completed, the bacteriological quality of the water should be improved
and no difficulty encountered in meeting the present recommended bacter-
iological standard or a more restrictive standard in the lower portions
of the impoundment. However, there may be problems in the upper reaches
of the impoundment in meeting a more restrictive bacteriological standard
(e.g. 300/100 ml).
* The means expressed in the report are geometric means.
-------
FIGURE 26
COLIFORM OIEOFF PATTERN WITHIN CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER STUDY AREA
EXPRESSED IN PERCENT OF INITIAL DENSITY ENTERING THE STUDY AREA
FLOW
KEY
-# TOTAL COLIFORM
-O FECAL COLIFORM
NOTE:
STAT.
RJVI.
STAT.
R.M.
1.
306.7
6
321.5
2.
308.5
7.
323.0
3.
309.2
10.
328.0
5.
316.2
12.
343.0
11
11
2 3
6 7
STATIONS
10
12
-------
72
The tributaries within the study area were generally free of any major
point sources of fecal pollution, with one exception. Yellowjacket Creek
was influenced by treated waste discharged from the City of LaGrange's
Yellowjacket Waste Treatment Plant and Hogansville, Georgia, Sewage Treat-
ment Plant. The effect of these wastes is seen at Station 8 which had a
mean fecal coliform density of 1800/100 ml. This station was located
approximately one-half mile downstream from the Yellowjacket Waste Treat-
ment Plant outfall. Station 9, located on Yellowjacket Creek, upstream
from LaGrange, had a mean fecal coliform density of 600/100 ml.
New River (Station 11) had a mean fecal coliform density of 540/100 ml
which indicated no major fecal contamination. A sanitary survey in the area
indicated that livestock could account for some fecal contamination along
this tributary.
Wehadkee Creek appeared to be free from any major sources of fecal
contamination, as indicated by mean fecal coliform densities of 200/100 ml
and 220/100 ml at Stations 4 and 13 respectively. Wildlife and livestock
within the area possibly contributed small amounts of fecal waste to
Wehadkee Creek.
The bacteriological data collected during the summer and winter studies
were separated into rainfall periods (high flow conditions) and dry periods
(stable flow conditions). The rainfall data used in reporting the data
were obtained from the National Climatic Center, LaGrange, Georgia (Table V).
The data were separated in this manner to delineate the effect of land run-
off upon the bacterial quality of the streams. The rainfall period included
the first week of the summer study and the second week of the winter study.
-------
73
The remainder of the summer and winter studies constituted the dry period or
stable flow period.
As seen in Table X there were no appreciable differences in mean total
and fecal coliform densities between left and right bank stations at each
point in the river. These densities were averaged to give one total and one
fecal coliform mean at each point in the river and are graphically presented
in Figures 27 and 28. The mean total and fecal coliform densities were higher
during the rainfall period than during the dry period at nearly every station.
This is expected because of the additional fecal contamination and nonfecal
soil related coliforms introduced into the streams by land runoff.
Stations 2 and 3 were not sampled during the last week of the rainfall
period because of exceptionally high waters. The failure to obtain these
samples is reflected by lower total and fecal coliform densities at Sta-
tions 2 and 3 during the rainfall period (Figures 27 and 28). Had sampling
been possible during the heavy runoff period, a pattern of elevated indica-
tor levels similar to that presented at Stations 1 and 5 would have been
produced.
Generally, the smaller the stream the more noticeable the effect is
from land runoff. Examples of this pattern are seen at the tributary
stations (Figures 29 and 30).
ISOLATION OF SALMONELLA
TION OF saljiuh^"",
. ,• i rat or determinations, special qualitative
In addition to the indicator a
; selected stations for the genus Salmonella,
tions were made at seie
examina-
-------
ipOOJOOOi—
IOOJOOO
lopool
\poo
FIGURE 27
COMPARISON OF THE GEOMETRIC MEAN TOTAL COLIFORM DENSITIES
AT THE RIVER STATIONS IN WET AND DRY PERIODS
FLOW
-
NOTE'
KEY
STAT. RM.
STAT
RM
o—
—o
WET PERIOD
-
1. 306.7
6
321.5
2. 308-9
7.
3230
DRY PERIOO
1 309-2
ia
32ao
-
5- 3162
12.
3410
2 3
10
12
STATIONS
-------
FIGURE 28
COMPARISON OF THE GEOMETRIC MEAN FECAL COLIFORM DENSITIES
AT THE RIVER STATIONS IN WET AND DRY PERIODS
KEY
o—
-o WET PERIOD
-•# DRY PERIOD
NOTE-
STAT.
R.M.
STAT.
R.M.
1.
306.7
6.
321.5
2.
308.5
7.
323.0
3.
309.2
10-
328.0
5.
316.2
12.
343.0
FLOW
1 I
2 3
J_L L
6 7 10
STATIONS
12
-------
40,000
FIGURE 29
COMPARISON OF THE GEOMETRIC MEAN TOTAL COLIFORM
DENSITIES AT TRIBUTARY STATIONS IN WET ft DRY PERIODS
30|,000
KEY
20,000
STATIONS
-------
5,000 r-
FIGURE 30
COMPARISON OF THE GEOMETRIC MEAN FECAL COLIFORM
DENSITIES AT TRIBUTARY STATIONS IN WET 8 DRY PERIODS
4,000
§
2
§
i
K
3,000
2,000
1,000
KEY
9 II
STATIONS
-------
78
TABLE X
COLIFORM DENSITIES
RAINFALL PERIODS VERSUS DRY PERIODS
Rainfall Period Dry Period
Station
Total
Coliforms
100 ml 1/
Fecal
Coliforms
100 ml 1/
Total
Coliforms
100 ml 1'
Fecal
Coliform:
100 ml 1
1A*
44,000
2,000
6,600
300
IB*
38,000
2,100
7,700
400
2A **
13,000
820
8,500
510
2B **
16,000
1,100
7,600
470
3k**
18,000
1,200
9,400
500
3B **
9,400
920
10,000
390
4
3,500
400
900
71
5A
35,000
2,500
16,000
1,100
5B
43,000
2,200
14,000
1,100
6A
59,000
4,600
21,000
1,900
6B
69,000
3,800
18,000
1,400
7
82,000
4,100
23,000
2,100
8
23,000
3,500
13,000
820
9
9,100
1,700
1,600
150
10A
91,000
3,500
23,000
2,100
10B
63,000
4,500
23,000
2,100
11
10,000
1,200
1,100
190
12A
110,000
6,400
34,000
4,000
12B
130,000
7,200
33,000
3,400
13
2,200
570
3,400
63
1/ Geometric Mean
* A - right bank looking upstream; B - left bank looking upstream.
** Stations were not sampled during a one week rainfall period due to
exceptionally high waters.
-------
79
A total of 25 samples were analyzed for Salmonella during the summer and
winter studies. During the summer study seven serotypes were isolated at
seven stations, and during the winter study 16 serotypes were isolated at
12 stations.
Salmonella is a large serologically related genus comprised of some
1300 serotypes. Salmonella is probably the easiest enteric pathogen to
isolate from environmental waters. All Salmonella are considered pathogenic
for man, animals, or both. The presence of Salmonella is proof of fecal
contamination and establishes the potential of disease contraction result-
ing from water ingestion or contact.
The relative density of an indicator is generally viewed to indicate
the relative magnitude of wastes being discharged. Moreover, as the indi-
cator level increases, so does the probability of pathogen presence increase.
Tables XI and XII show the fecal coliform densities and Salmonella serotypes
recovered during the summer and winter studies. As shown, Salmonella were
isolated at stations when the mean fecal coliform densities were as low as
76, 79 and 86/100 ml and not isolated when the mean fecal coliform density
was as high as 1800/100 ml. The failure to isolate Salmonella at this high
FC level does not infer the insignificance of the fecal coliform group as
indicators of fecal contamination. Rather, the failure to isolate Salmonella
at higher fecal coliform levels possibly results from analytical inadequacies
(swab technique), sporatic discharge of these pathogens, availability of host
animals, or a combination of these factors. The recovery of Salmonella at
fecal coliform densities of less than 100/100 ml simply underscores the fact
that low indicator levels alone do not negate the possibility of pathogen
presence.
-------
80
TABLE XI
FECAL COLIFORM DENSITIES AND SALMONELLA SEROTYPES
RECOVERED AT SELECTED STATIONS DURING SUMMER STUDY
Mean
Stream Sta. FC/100 ml* FC/100 ml** Salmonella Serotypes Recovered
Chattahoochee R.
1
240
1,400
None isolated
II 11
2
300
1,000
S. typhimurium
TV 11
5
1,200.
3,000
S. thompson
II If
6
1,800
3,300
None isolated
11 II
7
1,800
5,600
S. rubislaw
II H
10
1,600
4,900
S. havana
11 It
12
3,300
23,000
S. muenchen
Wehadk.ee Creek
4
100
100
S. montevideo
Wehadkee Creek
13
110
100
None isolated
Yellowjacket Cr.
8
5,400
8,200
S. derby
Yellowjacket Cr.
9
520
8,900
None isolated
New River
11
510
3,600
None isolated
* Geometric mean fecal coliform density during period of swab suspension.
** Fecal coliform density on day of swab retrieval.
-------
81
TABLE XII
FECAL COLIFORM DENSITIES AND SALMONELLA SEROTYPES RECOVERED
AT SELECTED STATIONS DURING WINTER STUDY
Mean
Stream
Sta.
Chattahoochee R.
1A
640
1,500
S. cubana
it ii
2B
560
600
S. heidelberg. S. rubislaw,
S. infantis
" M
3A
630
1,100
S. arion, S. infantis
ii ii
5A
990
950
S. cubana, S. san diego,
S. heidelberg
ii ii
6B
1,500
900
S. newington. S. heidelberg
ii 11
7
2,300
2,100
S. heidelberg, S. infantis,
S. thompson
ii ii
10A
2,500
2,200
S. anatum, S. amager, S. blockley
M ii
12A
4,700
6,000
S. give, S. rubislaw, S. infantis
Wehadkee Creek
4
86
610
S. derby
Wehadkee Creek
13
79
970
b
Yellowjacket Cr.
8
130
200
S. typhimuriuoi, S. rubislaw
Yellowjacket Cr.
9
76
1,200
S. newington
New River 11
11
170
6,800
S. give
* Geometric mean fecal coliform density during period of swab suspension.
** FC density at station on day of swab retrieval (heavy rainfall previous night)
-------
82
Salmonella were isolated at five of the seven river stations where recovery
was attempted during the summer study and were isolated from every river station
during the winter study. These numerous isolations indicate that the entire
reach of the Chattahoochee River within the study area was potentially hazard-
ous for water contact activities at the time of the study.
The isolation of SL. rubislan during the summer study and S^_ heidelberg.
S. infantis and thompson during the winter study at the LaGrange water
intake (Station 7) emphasizes the need for adequate waste and water treatment
to remove these pathogenic bacteria.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES FOLLOWING IMPOUNDMENT
GENERAL
There are many well-defined water quality/enviornmental changes
which result from impoundment. Classical limnology references provide
much insight into results of impoundment. For the West Point project,
it is appropriate that some of the changes following impoundment be
discussed in this preimpoundment report — many of these changes are
beneficial but others may require that measures be taken to prevent
or mitigate undesirable conditions.
PHYSICAL CHANGES
Impoundment of the Chattahoochee River by the West Point Dam will
reduce water velocities and allow precipitation of suspended silt.
A delta is expected to develop at the reservoir's headwaters near
Franklin, Georgia. Downstream, the intermittently muddy waters of the
Chattahoochee should become clear.
The water temperature regime will be modified in the reservoir.
Spring temperature rises will be delayed and autumn temperatures
prolonged by impoundment. Summertime thermal stratification and allied
quality problems may be alleviated because the Corps of Engineers
is considering methods of artificial destratification. Without such
facilities, the formation of density currents and thermal stratification
can be expected to change normal temperature patterns downstream. The
amount of change would also depend on the withdrawal elevation for
reservoir discharges.
-------
84
CHEMICAL CHANGES
Predictions of future chemical changes usually includes considerable
uncertainty. In the West Point Reservoir these predictions are more
indefinite than usual because of pending projects that may enhance water
quality. The projects include: improved treatment of wastes entering
the river from the Atlanta area and an extensive artificial
destratification system for the proposed reservoir.
Presently, the West Point Dam site is well downstream from the
dissolved oxygen sag point caused by Atlanta's wastes. Occasionally,
during the summer, the dissolved oxygen level near Franklin, Georgia,
has fallen below 4 mg/1. However, the duration of low DO is so short that
no adverse effects have been directly associated with this fluctuation.
If thermal stratification is not extensive or prolonged, there should
be no oxygen deficiency problems in the new lake.
Leaching of materials from the newly in undated bottom should be
restricted largely to the early impoundment period. Although the
huge volume of water stored in the reservoir after impoundment should
provide sufficient dilution to prevent major problems, impoundment
will cause a short term build-up of dissolved constituents.
By the time impoundment is began, most waste discharges in the
watershed will be receiving secondary treatment. However, the residual
nutrients in these wastes, together with raw waste discharges during
rains from Atlanta's combined sewer system and surface runoff from both
urban and rural areas may be of sufficient quantity to produce luxuriant?"
algal growth. The possibility of this growth, which could interfere
with recreation and could increase water treatment cost, cannot be
ruled out on the basis of this study.
-------
85
Another possible deleterious effect of impoundment is build-up of
iron and manganese compounds in hypolimnetic waters. The soluble form
of these metals in the +2 valence state produce problems in water -
supplies by causing obnoxious tastes, odors, and stains. Since direct
lake water use includes potable and textile processing water supply, it
is desirable that iron and manganese concentrations be kept low. If
the Corps of Engineers installs a destratification facility in the
reservoir, soluble iron in the zone of influence will be reduced but
manganous forms may still be high unless the zone of destratification
influence extends over most of the impounded area (19). Possible solutions
to manganese problems for water supply purposes would be oxidation
treatment of raw water and/or selective withdrawal of low manganese
(usually epilimnetic) waters.
BIOLOGICAL CHANGES
Silt removal (decreased turbidity) and reduced water velocity are
two major environmental changes caused by impoundment that drastically
affect biotic conditions. (20)(21) While bacterial levels should be
reduced to acceptable recreational levels, the increased sunlight
penetration and the reduced velocity with adequate nutrients available
will probably increase plant productivity. In open water, plankton
productivity may greatly increase. Newly inundated reservoir arms and
coves will likely develop lentic rooted plants. These rooted plants
are basic food web elements and their biotic modifications are essential
to developing a productive, well-balanced lake environment.
Bottom fauna changes will be marked by the disappearance of stream
organisms and an increase in lake species. Certainly the stream-
-------
86
dwelling stoneflies, caddisflies, and mayflies will not tolerate such
reservoir conditions as reduced currents, deep water, or perhaps the
absence of oxygen near the lake bottom. In the relatively stationary
reservoir water, these flowing-water species will be replaced with
other organisms. One mud-burrowing mayfly, Haxagenia, common to the
Chattahoochee River should survive and perhaps thrive under the new
conditions brought about by the impoundment. However, the principal
benthic components will probably be various members of the Diptera and
aquatic worm groups found in all southeastern United States lakes.
Greater fish production and better fishing are expected in the new
lake because upstream pollution will be minimized by lake dilution and
more fish habitat will be provided. However, a reservoir is not the
solution to the Chattahoochee River pollution problem. Even with the
impoundment, the headwaters of the reservoir, near Franklin, Georgia,
may still be affected unfavorably by upstream pollution. The amount
of river used by reservoir fish will depend on the effectiveness of
pollution control program being implemented along the Chattahoochee
River.
-------
87
REFERENCES
1. SE Comprehensive Data - "STORET" printouts for Chattahoochee River
Basin 1964, 1965, and 1966 (Franklin to West Point, Georgia - 10
stations).
2. Georgia Water Quality Control Board, 1970. Water Quality Data -
Atlanta Area - Chattahoochee, Flint, and South Rivers - 1968 and
1969 Data, pp 1-66 (mimeo).
3. Beck, William, Jr., 1965. A Brief Biological Survey of the Chatta-
hoochee River and Selected Tributary Streams. USPHS, SE Compre-
hensive Water Pollution Control Project, pp 1-4 (mimeo).
4. Corps 1961 - Survey Report of Chattahoochee River-West Point.
5. Classification for Interstate Waters in Georgia.
6. Proceedings of the Conference in the Matter of Pollution of the
Interstate Waters of the Chattahoochee River and Its Tributaries,
July 1966.
7. American Public Health Association, 1965. Standard Methods for
the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Twelfth Edition.
8. Geldreich, E. E., H. F. Clark, C. B. Huff, and L. C. Best, 1965.
"Fecal Coliform Organism Medium for Membrane Filter Techniques,"
Journal AWWA, 57. No. 2.
9. Moore, B., 1949. "The Detection of Parotyphoid Carriers in Towns
by Means of Sewage Examination," Bull. Hyg.. 24, 187.
10. Spino, D. F., 1966. "Elevated Temperature Technique for the Iso-
lation of Salmonella from Streams," Applied Microbiology, 14, pp.
591-596.
11. Ewing, W. H., 1962. Enterobacteriaceae Biochemical Methods for
Group Differentiation. Public Health Service Publication No. 734.
12. Edwards, P. R., 1962, W. H. Ewing. Isolation and Grouping of
Salmonella and Shigella Cultures. U. S. Dept. of Health, Education,
and Welfare, Public Health Service.
13. Hall, Edward T., Water Quality Data - Chattahoochee River, Georgia.
(Georgia Water Quality Control Board, Atlanta - unpublished data.)
14. Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, 1968. Water Quality
Criteria. Report of the National Technical Advisory Committee to
the Secretary of the Interior, Washington, DC, p 234.
-------
88
15. Schneider, R. F., 1962. "Seasonal Succession of Certain Inverte-
brates in a Northwestern Florida Lake." Quart. Journ. Fla. Acad.
Sci. 25(2):127-141.
16. Neel, J. K., 1968. "Seasonal Succession of Benthic Algae and Their
Macroinvertebrate Residents in a Head-water Limestone Stream."
Journ. Poll. Cont. Fed. Part 2:10-30.
17. Egglishaw, H. J. and D. W. Mackay, 1967. A Survey of the Bottom
Fauna of Streams in the Scottish Highlands. Part III Seasonal
Changes in the Fauna of Three Streams, Hydrobiologic 30:305-334.
18. Tebo, L. , Jr. Biological Surveillance - Chattahoochee River,
Georgia (Environmental Protection Agency, Southeast Water Labora-
tory, Athens, Georgia - unpublished data).
19. Little, J. A., R. F. Schneider, B. J. Carroll. "Artificial De-
stratification Project at Allatoona Reservoir, Georgia." Report
from Southeast Water Laboratory to U. S. Corps of Engineers (mimeo).
20. Jackson, H. 0. and W. C. Starrett, 1959. "Turbidity and Sedimentation
of Lake Chautauqua, Illinois." Journ. Wildlife Man. 23(2):157-168
21. Jaag, 0. and H. Ambuhl, 1962. "The Effect of the Current on the
Composition of Biocoenoses in Flowing Water Streams." International
Conf. Water Poll. Res., London, England. 31-49.
-------
A-J.
APPENDIX A
Correspondence Requesting the Study
-------
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SAVANNAH DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 889
SAVANNAH. GEORGIA 31402
IN REPLY REFER TO
SASNE
25 February 1970
Mr. John A. Little
Chief, Impoundment Studies
Department of Interior, FWPCA
Southeast Water Laboratory
College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30601
Dear Mr. Little:
Inclosed are the original and three copies of DA Form 2544, Order for
Reimbursable Services, covering preimpoundment water quality surveys at
the West Point Project. Please sign and return two copies to the
Savannah District.
Additional funds will be obligated in FY 1971 as outlined in our letter
of 6 February 1970 to Mr. Thoman. A copy of your Regional Director's
letter of 11 February 1970 is also inclosed.
Sincerely yours
2 Incl
As stated
W. T. MOORE
Chief, Engineering Division
-------
A-3
INTRA-ARMY ORDER FOR
REIMBURSABLE SERVICES
For us* of this form, AR 37-108 and
All 37*110; the proponent agency Is
Office of tho Comptroller of fho Army.
1- RECEIVING OFFICE CONTROL NUMBER
2' ORDER
a NUMBER
PD 70-6
b DATE
17 Feb 70 *
| | FUNDED | | AUTOMATIC
3- CHANGE OROER
a NUMBER
b OATE
ORDERED BY (Command, Installation or Activity, and address)
(Include ZIP Coda)
U.S. ATngr Engineer District, Savannah
Corps of Engineers* P.O. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402
5. TO BE PERFORMED BY (Command, Installation or Activity, and
address) (include ZIP Coda)
Dept. of Interior, FWPCA
Southeast Water Laboratory
College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30601
S. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
It Is requested that FWPCA make prelmpoundment water quality surveys at the
West Point Project. FY 1970 funds 1n the amount of $5,000 reserved for reconnais-
sance and preliminary surveys In accordance with reference SASNE letter dated
6 February 1970 and Department of Interior acceptance letter dated 11 February 1970.
Additional funds to be reserved as required. Please identify all bills as follows:
PD 70-6-9260921-003046-05
7a NAME AND TITLE OF ORDERING OFFICER
FRANK H. POSEY, JR.
Chief, Special Programs Section
6 SIGNATURE
C OATE
17 Feb 70
ORIGINATING FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING OFFICE APPROVAL
•>. ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION
96X3122 Cnnztructian, General. CE. Civil
b. AMOUNT
is.ooo
e CHANGE
INCREASE amount DECREASE AMOUNT REVISCO AMOUNT .
Services to be performed pursuant to this order are properly chargeable to the appro]
ntinnc n. ntW accounts indicated above until . the expirati<
date of this order. w.y ¦ Mon* ¦ *..»
»ri-
3fl
10a. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF APPROVING OFFICER
> JAMES A. MACD0NALD, JR.
Finance and Accounting Officer
6. SIGNATURE
^ OsrrtJ-3 cyZyyirt-
ACCEPTING OFFICER -
11. the ABOVE TERMS «NO CUN
•. typed name and title of accepting officer
JOHN A. LITTLE
Chief, Impoumfcnent Studies
Ut 1 IWNS ARE SATISFACTORY ANU Wt "
tCm
c. DATE ACCEPTED
DA
FORM
OCT «4
2544
REPL ACES PREVIOUS EDITION OF T WIS FORM AND OA FORM 1619. » J AN 80, E. *»» ! »r»
OF WHICH WILL BE ISSUED AND USED UNTIL 1 OCT 68 UNLESS SOONER EXHAUSTED.
-------
A-A
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
OK
IOUTNIMT RKOION
SUITE *00
14*1
A'
Col. John S. Egbert, District Engineer
Savannah District, Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402
Dear Col. Egbert:
Thank you for your letter of 6 February 1970, requesting a
preimpoundment water quality survey at the West Point Project.
He are in essential agreement with the features of the study
outlined in your letter and in the Technical Studies Work Plan
(revised as of September 1969). Preliminary aspects of the work
will begin this fiscal year, and a request for reimbursement for
$5,000 will be sent during 4th quarter FY 70. The study will be
completed during FY 71 with quarterly billing for the remaining
$20,000.
During reconnaissance of the study area, the need for additional
sampling stations may be established. We feel that limited
additional sampling can be incurred within the cost frame which you
have outlined.
May I also express pleasure with the working relationships established
between our respective staffs. Studies such as this one at West Point,
qnd also at Allatoona Reservoir, will only improve our capability for
providing water quality control.
Sincerely yours,
John R. Thoman
Director
-------
A-5
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
SAVANNAH DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P. O. BOX 889
SAVANNAH. GEORGIA 31402
IN REPLY REFER TO
SASNE 6 February 1970
Mr. John R. Thomas
Regional Director, Southeast Region
Federal Water Pollution Control
Adminis tration
Suite 300
1421 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Dear Mr. Thoman:
Reference is made to discussions with Mr. J. A. Little of your Southeast
Water Laboratory and Mr. F. H. Posey of our Special Programs Section on
28 January 1970, in Athens, Georgia, concerning the Water Quality Pre-
Impoundment Survey for the West Point Project.
It was agreed that FWPCA personnel from the impoundment studies group
would perform the pre-impoundment survey outlined in the inclosed
Technical Studies Work Plan, dated February 1969, as revised through Sep-
tember 1969. This work will be performed at the twelve sampling stations
shown on page 4, analyzing the parameters listed on pages 5, 6, and 7, and
vising the methods and procedures agreed upon. It was further agreed that
this work could be performed within the estimated cost summarized on page 8.
The Savannah District will reimburse the Southeast Water Laboratory for the
cost incurred up to $25,000, which will include payment for all field
sampling, bacteriological and chemical analyses, data processing, report
preparation and reproduction, per diem, and transportation, and contingencies.
It was further agreed that the Southeast Water Laboratory would bill
Savannah District on a quarterly basis for services performed as follows:
a. Fiscal Year 1970: $5,000 for reconnaissance and preliminary survey,
locate and establxsh sampling stations, and compile and research existing
data.
b. Fiscal Year 1971: $20,000 for field investigations primarily in
August 1970 and January 1971 (and at other periods if required to establish
low flow, warm weather, and high flow, cold weather conditions), and for all
other work necessary to conqjlete the final report by 1 July 1971.
-------
A-6
SASNE 6 February 1970
Mr. John R. Thoman
Upon, receipt of notification from the Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration of your acceptance of the above described work, the
Department of the Army, Savannah District, Corps of Engineers, will obli-
gate the necessary funds.
To assist in your planning of this pre-impoundment survey, the following
West Point Project schedule is furnished:
Initiate Phase I - Reservoir Clearing 1 Jul 1971
Initiate Phase II - Reservoir Clearing 1 Dec 1971
River Closure Jun 1972
Begin Filling Nov 1972
Project Completion Sep 1973
You will be notified immediately of any significant change in the above
schedule; and, likewise, we would require that you notify us of any signifi-
cant departure from this letter of agreement and the inclosed Technical
Studies Work Plan.
It is indeed a pleasure to continue our cooperative endeavors in the inter-
est of maintaining a high quality environment.
Sincerely yours,
1 Incl
As stated
u
i-,: ^ //' 1 ' '
/^OHN S. EGBERT '
Colonel,/ Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
Copy Furnished w/incl
Mr. John A Little
Chief, Impoundment Studies
FWPCA, Southeast Water Laboratory
College Station Road
Athens s Georgia 30601
2
-------
OPTtONAi FORM NO. 10
MAY 1*62 COITION
OIA fPM U1 CPU 101-11.4
A-7
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO
: Files
date: February 3,1970
FROM : John A. little
subject : Vest Point Preimpoundment Study, Georgia & Alabama
Bob Schneider, Bobby Carroll, Mid I met in Athens on January 28 with Frank Posey and
Herb Darigo of the Savannah District, Corps of Engineers, to discuss the subject study. The
Corps had estimated that two 2-week long seasonal surveys would cost approximately $24,900,
for which we would be reimbursed if we agree to perform the work. Our reaction to the Corps
was favorable, and tentative dates for field studies were set for August, 1970, and during the
winter of 1970-71.
Some concern was expressed that clearing operations at the reservoir would interfere with water
quality investigations. A check with the district office revealed no problem:
July 1,1971-
December 1,1971 +-
June 1,1972-
November 1,1972 -
Clearing near dam to begin
Clearing upper reservoir to begin
Dam closure
Start filling
A fter exchanging necessary correspondence to initiate studies, we agreed to bill up to $5,000
during FY-70 in order to "get the study on the books"; For this initial sum and before this
fiscal year ends, a reconnaissance wiQ be made to detoniiine final sampling points (among other
things). Data available from past state and FWPCA studies in the area will also be collected
and analyzed. Mr. Otinger began the assemblage and analysis of past data some time back.
We agreed to a quarterly billing procedure with a final report completion flate sej- for spring,
John A. little
cc: Paul J. Traina
Robert Schneider
Bobby J. Carroll
4010—109
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
-------
OPTIONAL FORM MO. 10
MAY 1963 IOITION
OSA FPMR (4) CFW 101-11.6
A-8
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum
TO
Files
date: July 11, 1969
FROM : J. A. Little
SUBJECT: West Point Reservoir pre-impoundment study
Mr. Herb Rogers called today to inform me that a request for the subject
studies will not be made until next year (calendar year 1970). Clearing
operations will not begin at the reservoir site until 1971, therefore,
if we conduct our major effort next year there should be no major
interference from construction activities.
cc: P. Traina
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
-------
A-9
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
JTHEAST WATER LABORATORY
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30601
May 20, 1969
Mr. Frank H. Posey, Jr.
Chief, Special Programs Section
U. S. Army Engineer District, COE
P. 0. Box 889
Savannah, Georgia 31402
Dear Mr. Posey:
In our phone conversation last week you mentioned that
there might be a delay in your request for preimpoundment
studies on the West Point Reservoir project. I mentioned
at the time, and I would like to go on record now by
saying, such a delay would create problems with our studies.
In the past we have found that construction activities
interfere with water quality investigations, and we would
like to complete these investigations before construction
has advanced too far.
Sincerely yours,
John A. Little
Chief, Impoundment Studies
Incl 2
-------
B-l
APPENDIX B
Location of Sampling Stations
-------
iti
to.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
B-2
TABLE 1
LOCATION OF SAMPLING STATIONS
River
Mile Location
306.7 Chattahoochee River - West Point, Georgia,
above U.S. 29. Troup County, Georgia.
308.5 Chattahoochee River - Approximately 0.5 mile
downstream from the damsite. Troup County,
Georgia.
309.2 Chattahoochee River - Approximately 1,000 ft.
upstream from damsite. Troup County, Georgia.
314.4 Wehadkee Creek - Relocated State Route 244,
7.3 just east of State Line Road. Troup County,
Georgia.
316.2 Chattahoochee River - Georgia Hwy. 238, west
of LaGrange, Georgia. Troup County, Georgia.
321.5 Chattahoochee River - Georgia Hwy. 109, west
of LaGrange, Georgia. Troup County, Georgia.
323.0 Chattahoochee River - LaGrange water supply
intake station. Troup County, Georgia.
321.9 Yellowjacket Creek - Cameron Mill Road on
1.3 County Road S 2098, west of LaGrange, Georgia.
Troup County, Georgia.
321.9 Yellowjacket Creek - Youngs Mill Road, north-
13.2 east of LaGrange, Georgia. Troup County,
Georgia.
328.0 Chattahoochee River - Georgia Hwy. 219, north-
west of LaGrange, Georgia. Troup County,
Georgia.
335.2 New River - U.S. Hwy. 27, south of Franklin,
3.3 Georgia. Heard County, Georgia.
343.1 Chattahoochee River - U.S. Hwy. 27, Franklin,
Georgia. Heard County, Georgia.
314.4 Wehadkee Creek - Georgia Hwy. 60, west of
0.8 LaGrange, Georgia. Troup County, Georgia.
-------
APPENDIX C
USPHS Water Quality Data
for the
Chattahoochee River Basin
1964, 1965, and 1966
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST PFGION
CHATTAHOOCHFE» «IVFR
121910
CHATTAHOOCHEE
!3 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113SOSO
R WESTPT ABOV US29
2111204
00002
00007
00010
00020
00060
00070
00095
00300
00301
00304
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
01 ST ANCE
WATER
AIR
STREAM
TURR
CNDUCTVY
00
DO
ROO
FROM
* FROM
FR Y
TFMP
TEMP
FLOW
JKSN
AT 25C
SATUR
2 DAY
TO
RT RANK
MILES
CFNT
CENT
CUFT/SEC
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
PERCENT
MG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER
2
52
18
39
14
37
36
MAXIMUM
5.
30.0
24.0
7900.
74.
9.*
100.0
MINIMUM
3.
2.4
12.0
1970.
4?.
3.7
46.0
MEAN
4.
17.1
17.0
3806.
54.
6.1
56.0
LOG MEAN
4.
14.6
16.5
3591.
53.
8.0
87.3
6*/ 2/ 6
•*••••••••«•«»«««»•»««»»»««»
»•»«•»«*•»•
* » » • » « » • « 4 » «• <
00305
00310
00400
00403
00410
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
DATE PARAMFTER
ROD
ROO
PH
LA*
T ALK
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJCL
FROM
3 DAY
5 OAY
PH
CAC03
TOTAL
0ISS-1O5
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
TO
MG/L
MG/L
SU
SU
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
66/ 2/ 6
74
5.ft
0.5
1.7
1.4
1ft
7.10
6.60
*~92
6.9I
31
20.
14.
16.
16.
•<>»»« o« »««•»«•«•«»»»
»«»«•«»«•»•«
DATE
FROM
TO
oarameter
00*30
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
*G/L
00653
SOLP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLOfflDF
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AS*DISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
BA.D1SS
UG/L
01010
BERYLIUM
BEtOISS
UG/L
01020
BORON
R.DISS
UO/L
01025
CADMIUM
CD.DISS
UG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER 19 2 2 2 2 2
MAXIMUM 6. 30. 16. 0.02 2!. 5.
MINIMUM 3. 30. 14. 0.02 19. 5.
MEAN 4. 30. 15* 0*02 20. 5.
LOG MEAN 4. 30. 15. 0.0? 20. 5.
66/ ?./ 6
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
01030
CHROMIUM
C«.DISS
UG/L
01035
COBALT
CO.DISS
UG/L
01040
COPPER
CU-DISS
UG/L
01045
IRON
TOTAL
• JG/L
01046
IRON
FE.DISS
UG/L
01049
LEAD
PM.DISS
UG/L
01055
MANGNFSF
MN
UG/L
01056
MANGNESE
MN.DISS
UG/L
01060
MOLY
MOfOISS
UG/L
01065
NICKEL
NI.DTSS
UG/L
64/10/19
66/ 2/ 6
••••*••»»
DATE
FROM
TO
NUMBER
2
2
2
5
3
?
4
2
2
2
MAXIMUM
29.
?.
255.
1 175.
1.
11.
153.0
0. 1
13.
17.
MINIMUM
3.
1 .
?.
1.
0*
1.
0.4
0.0
5.
2.
MEAN
16.
2.
1 ?9 •
274.
0.
8.
39.6
0. 1
9.
10.
LOG MEAN
9.
1.
23.
14.
0.
6.
4.2
0. 1
8.
6.
PARAMETER
01070
PHOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AG.DISS
•JG/L
0101*0
STPONTUM
SR.DISS
UG/L
OlOftS
VANADIUM
V»DISS
UG/L
ni090
ZINC
7N*0ISS
UG/L
0110S
ALUMINUM
ALtTOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COL I
mfimendo
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
MPN CONF
/100ML
31615
FEC COLI
MPNECMEO
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
mfm-fcrr
/100ML
number
1
>
?
?
p
2
49
24
MAXIMUM
65.
0.2
14.
2.
90.
141.
noooooo*
6000.
MtNIMUM
65.
0.2
1 1.
2.
5.
11.
3100.
200.
MEAN
65.
0.2
14.
2.
48.
76.
281696.
1768.
LOG MFAN
65.
0.2
13.
2.
21.
39.
30256.
969.
66/ 2/ 6
-------
HEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
12193#
CH-05
S'SWR64 "8 -or <-*<*
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S0S0 ?lnm
DATE
FROM
TO
64/10/19
PARAMETER
0000?
HSAMPLOC
% F ROM
«T BANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR Y
MILES
00010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070 00095
TURR
JKSN
JU
NUMBER
2
47
19
MAXIMUM
3.
31.0
26.0
MINIMUM
3.
2*5
7.0
MEAN
3.
17.3
15.7
LOG MEAN
3.
14.3
14.7
66/ 2/ 6
DATE
FROM
TO
64/10/19
PARAMETER
00305
900
3 DAY
MG/L
66/ 2/ 6
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
00310
ROD
5 DAY
MG/L
25
3.3
0.5
1*6
1 *4
00400
PH
SU
38
7.30
6*50
6.85
6.85
00403
LAB
PH
SU
0041O
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
31
19*
11*
16*
16*
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
CNOUCTVY
AT 2SC
MICROMHO
14
7?.
37,
53.
5?*
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
##300 00301 00304
00 00 rod
SATUR p 0»»
"8/t PERCENT MG/L
U.7 113.0
5*8 73.0
8«6 88.0
8.5 87.6
00530 00610 00625
ammonia TOT KJEL
NH3-N N
MG/L MQ/L
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00630
N0?4N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
64/10/19
66/ 2/ 6
number
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
19
6.
2.
4.
3.
01000
01005
01010
01020
ARSENIC
BARIUM
0ERYLIUM
BORON
AS.OISS
BA.OISS
BE.OISS
B*I>ISS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
2
2
2
2
30.
15.
0*02
15.
30.
14.
0.02
15*
30.
15.
0*02
15.
30.
14.
0.02
15.
01025
CAOMIUM
COtOISS
UG/L
01030
01035
01040
01045
01046
OATE PARAMETER
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
iron
FROM
CR'OISS
CO.HISS
CU-OISS
TOTAL
FE«0ISS
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER
2
2
2
5
3
maximum
37.
2.
43.
765.
0.
minimum
1.
1.
2.
1.
0.
MEAN
19.
2.
23.
170*
0.
LOG MEAN
6.
1.
9.
11*
0.
01049
LEAD
PfUOISS
UG/L
01055
MANGNESE
UG/L
01056 01060
MANGNESE MOLY
MM.DISS MO.fllSS
UG/L
UG/L
01065
NICKEL
NIOISS
UG/L
2
4
2
2
2
20.
105.0
0.1
3.
20*
3.
0.2
0.0
2.
2.
12.
26.7
0*1
3.
11.
8.
1.8
0*0
2.
6.
66/ 2/ 6
01070
01075
O1080
01085
01090
01105
31501
31505
31615
31616
OATE PARAMETER
PMOS-T
SILVER
STRONTUW
VANADIUM
ZINC
aluminum
TOT COLI
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
FEC COL I
FROM
P-SPEC
AG«DI5S
SR.DISS
V*DISS
JN.OISS
ALtTOT
MFIMENOO
MPN CONF
NPNECMED
MFMoFCBR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
/IO0ML
/100ML
64/10/19
NUMBER
1
?
2
?
2
2
5
39
24
6
MAXIMUM
33.
0.2
15.
2.
77.
144.
82000.
240000.
8000.
2800.
MINIMUM
33.
0.2
14.
2.
16.
17.
56000.
3300.
490.
1100.
MEAN
33*
0*2
15.
2.
47.
81.
69000.
60136*
2637 •
1892*
LOG MEAN
33*
0.2
14.
2.
35.
49,
68132.
29578.
1809.
1713.
66/ 2/ 6
-------
WEST POINT STUOY 121938 CH-06
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER CMATT R 6A HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGE
13 GE0R6U
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE GDPH 16
1113S050 2111204
00002
00007
00010
00020
00060
00070
00095
00300
00301
00304
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
01STANCE
HATER
AIR
STREAM
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
00
ROD
FROM
% FROM
FR Y
TEMP
TEMP
FLOW
JKSN
AT 25C
SATUR
2 DAY
TO
RT BANK
MILES
CENT
CENT
CUFT/SEC
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
PERCENT
MG/L
65/ 8/12
NUMBER
17
17
17
MAXIMUM
31.0
9.1
117.0
MINIMUM
2.3
5.5
70.0
MEAN
34.3
6.8
84.2
LOG MEAN
20.3
6.8
83.5
65/ 9/ 3
00305
00310
00400
00403
00410
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
DATF PARAMETER
BOO
BOO
PH
LAB
T ALK
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
FROM
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
TO
MG/L
MG/L
SU
SU
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
65/ 8/12
number
17
17
17
MAXIMUM
3.3
7.20
28.
MINIMUM
0.5
6.50
13.
MEAN
1.5
6.75
16.
LOG MEAN
1.4
6.74
16.
65/ 9/ 3
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
01000
01005
01010
01020
01025
DATE PARAMETER
N021N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLIUM
BORON
CADMIUM
FROM
N
P04
P04
C
CL
AS.DISS
BA.DISS
BE.DISS
e.oiss
CO.DISS
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
65/ 8/12
65/ 9/ 1
number
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
17
5.
2.
4.
4.
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
01070
PHOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AG.DISS
UG/L
01080
STRONTUM
SR.DISS
UG/L
01085
VANADIUM
V.DISS
UG/L
01090
ZINC
ZN.OISS
UG/L
01105
ALUMINUM
AL»TOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
MPN CONF
/lOOMt
31615
FEC COLI
MPNECMED
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
65/ 8/12
65/ 9/ 3
NUMBER
17
17
MAXIMUM
24000.
4900.
MINIMUM
3100.
200.
MEAN
8635.
1247.
LOG MEAN
7374.
706.
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121940 CH-08
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER YELLOW JACKET CR S2098 W OF LAGR
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00007
00010
00020
00060
00070
00095
00300
00301
00304
DATE
PAWAMETER
HSAMPLOC
DISTANCE
WATER
AIR
STREAM
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
DO
BOD
FROM
* FROM
FR Y
TEMP
TEMP
FLOW
JKSN
AT 25C
SATUR
2 DAY
TO
RT BANK
MILES
CENT
CENT
CUFT/SEC
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
PERCENT
MG/L
64/ 8/23
NUMBER
29
13
30
12
30
29
MAXIMUM
30.0
24.0
293.
73.
10.0
97.0
MINIMUM
12.0
8.0
41.
30.
5.5
65.0
MEAN
20.0
17.0
127.
59.
8.0
85.0
LOG MEAN
19.3
16.1
102.
57.
7.8
84.4
65/ 9/
3
00305
00310
00400
00403
00410
00500
00515
00530
00610
OOf>2S
DATE
PARAMETER
BOO
900
PH
LAB
T ALK
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
FROM
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
TO
MG/L
MG/L
SU
SU
MG/L
MG/L
c mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
64/ 8/23
NUMBER
23
29
30
MAXIMUM
13.2
7.20
32.
MINIMUM
0.5
6.60
22.
MEAN
2.0
6.90
26.
LOG MEAN
1.4
6.89
26.
65/ 9/
3
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
01000
01005
01010
01020
01025
BATE
PARAMETER
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLIUM
BORON
CADMIUM
FROM
N
P04
P04
C
CL
AS.DISS
BA.OISS
BE.DISS
n.niss
CD.DISS
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
64/ 8/23
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
20
S.
1.
3.
3.
65/ 9/ 3
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
01070
PHOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AG.DISS
UG/L
01080
STRONTUM
SR.OISS
UG/L
01085
VANADIUM
V.DISS
UG/L
01090
ZINC
ZN.DISS
UG/L
01105
ALUMINUM
AL.TOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
MPN CONF
/I00ML
31615
FEC COLI
MPNECMED
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
64/ 8/73
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
65/ 9/ 3
29
490000.
23000.
143483.
94833.
18
130000.
4600.
32411.
22338.
-------
"EST POINT STUDY 12]945 CH-09
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER YELLOW JACKET CR NE LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
11I3S050 2111204
DATE
FROM
TO
65/ 8/12
PARAMETER
65/ 9/ f
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
00002
HSAMPLOC
« FROM
RT RANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR V
MILES
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
17
32.0
2.6
?1>B
18.6
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070
TURR
JKSN
JU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00300
00
HG/L
17
6.4
S.3
S.9
5.9
00301
00
SATUR
PERCENT
17
A4.0
60.0
70.1
69.7
00304
BOO
2 DAY
MG/L
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00305
ROO
3* DAY
MG/L
00310
BOO
5 DAY
MG/L
00400
PH
SU
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
OISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
65/ 8/12
65/ 9/ 3
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
log mean
17
3.2
0.7
1.5
1.3
17
6.90
6.50
6.72
6.72
16
32.
23.
27.
26.
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00630
NO2&N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
»04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AS,DISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
QA.OISS
UG/L
01010
BERYLIUM
RE,DISS
UG/L
01020
RORON
8.DISS
UG/L
01025
CADMIUM
CD.DISS
UG/L
65/ 8/12
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
65/ 9/ 3
17
3.
2.
2.
2.
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
01070
PMOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AG.DISS
UG/L
01080
STRONTUM
SR.DISS
UG/L
01085
VANADIUM
V.DISS
UG/L
01090
ZINC
7N.0ISS
UG/L
01105
ALUMINUM
AL.TOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENOO
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
*4PN CONF
/100ML
31615
FEC COLI
MPNECMEO
/100ML
31616
FEC COL I
MFM-FC8R
/100ML
65/ 8/12
65/ 9/ 1
number
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
17
240000.
24000.
106706.
85719.
17
79000.
1700.
19529.
12766.
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121960 CH-10
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE, RIVER CHATT R 6A HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00002
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT BANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR Y
MILES
00010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070
TURB
JKSN
JU
00095
CNOUCTVV
AT 2SC
MICROMHO
00300
00
MG/L
00301
00
SATUR
PERCENT
00304
ROO
2 DAY
MG/L
6"!/ 8/12
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
65/ 9/ 3
17
32.0
2.9
25.2
23.3
17
9.5
4.7
6.6
6.5
17
122.0
60.0
B1.4
80.2
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00305
BOD
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOO
5 DAY
MG/L
00400
PH
SU
00403
LAB
PH
Stl
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
65/ 8/12
65/ 9/ 3
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
17
3.4
0.7
1.6
1.4
17
8.10
6.50
6.77
6.76
17
26.
13.
17.
17.
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00630
N021N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
*G/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AStDISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
BAtOISS
UG/L
01010
BERYLIUM
BE.DISS
UG/L
01020
BORON
B.DISS
UG/L
01025
CADMIUM
COtOISS
UG/L
65/ 8/1?
65/ 9/ 3
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
17
5.
2.
4.
4.
01070
01075
01080
01085
01090
01105
31501
31505
31615
31616
DATE PARAMETER
PHOS-T
SILVER
STRONTUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
TOT COL I
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
FEC COLI
FROM
P-SPEC
AGtDISS
SR.OISS
V.DISS
ZNtDISS
ALtTOT
HFIMENOO
MPN CONF
MPNECMED
MFM-FCBR
TO ,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
/100ML
/100ML
65/ 8/12
NUMBER
17
17
MAXIMUM
130000.
4900.
MINIMUM
3300.
200.
MEAN
30171.
2076.
LOG MEAN
18696a
1302.
65/ 9/3
-------
WEST POINT STUD* 121980 CH-11
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE~ RIVER NEW R US 27 S OF FRANKLIN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111304
OATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
« FROM
RT BANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR Y
MILES
04010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070
TUR8
JKSN
JU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00300
00
MG/L
00301
00
SATUR
PERCENT
00304
BOO
2 DAY
M6/L
65/ 9/ 7
65/
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
24.0
14.0
20.3
20.0
15
8.3
6.8
7.7
7.7
15
94.0
75.0
84.1
84.0
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00305
BOO
3 OA*
MG/L
00310
800
5 DAY
•W/L
00400
PM
SU
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
65/ 9/ 7
65/ 9/29
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
IS
1.8
0.4
1.2
1.1
15
7.40
6.70
7.08
7.08
15
43.
29.
36.
36.
OATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00630
N021N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
•M5/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AStOISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
BA.DISS
UG/L
01010
BERYL IIJM
BE.DISS
UG/L
01020
BORON
BtDISS
UG/L
01025
CADMIUM
CD.DISS
UG/L
65/ 9/ 7
number
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
5.
2.
3.
3.
65/ 9/29
OATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
01070
PHOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AGtOISS
UG/L
01080
STRONTUM
SR.DISS
UG/L
010B5
VANADIUM
V*DISS
UG/L
01090
ZINC
ZN«DISS
UG/L
01105
ALUMINUM
AL.TOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
MPN CONF
/100ML
31615
FEC COLI
MPNECMEO
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
•5/ 9/ 7
NUMBER
15
15
MAXIMUM
7900.
1700.
MINIMUM
1100.
200.
MEAN
3067.
473.
L06 MEAN
2629.
348.
65/ 9/29
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121992 CH-12
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER CHATT R AT US 27 FRNKLN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE C-l GOPH IS
1113S050 6111204
OATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT BANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR Y
MILES
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070
TURB
JKSN
JU
00095
CNOUCTVV
AT 25C
M1CROMHO
00300
00
MG/L
00301
00
SATUR
PERCENT
00304
BOO
2 DAY
HG/L
6S/ 9/ 7
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
27.0
19.0
23.1
22.9
65/ 9/29
IS
8.1
4.8
6.4
6.4
15
88.0
55.0
73.7
73.2
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00305
ROD
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOO
5 DAY
MG/L
00400
PH
SO
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
00530
RES10UE
DISS-105 TOT NFLT
C MG/L MG/L
01)610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
65/ 9/ 7
65/ 9/29
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
3.6
0.8
2.2
2.0
15
6.80
6.20
6.51
6.50
15
19.
U.
14.
14.
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LPO4-T
P04
MG/L
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AStDISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
BA.DISS
UG/L
01010
BERYLIUM
BE.DISS
UG/L
01020
BORON
B.OISS
UG/L
01025
CADMIUM
CD.DISS
UG/L
65/ 9/ 7
65/ 9/29
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
6.
3.
5.
4.
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
01070
PHOS-T
P-SPEC
UG/L
01075
SILVER
AGoDISS
UG/L
01080
STROMTUM
SR.DISS
UG/L
01085
VANADIUM
V.DISS
UG/L
01090
ZINC
ZN.DISS
UG/L
01105
ALUMINUM
AL»TOT
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
31505
TOT COLI
MPN CONF
/100ML
31615
FEC COL I
MPNECMEO
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
65/ 9/ 7
65/ 9/29
NUMBER
15
15
MAXIMUM
540000.
110000.
MINIMUM
2300.
200.
MEAN
81840.
10813.
LOG MEAN
17620.
1840.
-------
VEST POINT STUDY "181 *83'
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER NEW R COUNTY Sao15 CORINTH
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00002
HSAMPLOC
ft FROM
RT BANK
00007
DISTANCE
FR Y
MILES
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00070
TURB
JKSN
JO
0009S -
CNOUCTVV
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00300
00
MG/L
00301
00
SATUR
PERCENT
00304
BOD
2 DAY
MG/L
65/ 9/ 7
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
15
24.0
1.8
19.3
17.3
IS
7.7
6.0
7.1
7.0
IS
86.0
68.0
77.2
77.1
65/ 9/29
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00305
BOO
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOO
5 DAY
MG/L
00400
PH
SU
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
0ISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
65/ 9/ 7
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
14
2.2
0.4
1.4
1.2
15
7.40
6.80
7.06
7.06
14
55.
33.
45.
65/ 9/29
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
01000
ARSENIC
AS.DISS
UG/L
01005
BARIUM
DA.DISS
UG/L
01010
BERYLIUM
BE.01SS
UG/L
01020
BORON
B.DISS
UG/L
01025
CADMIUM
CD.DISS
UG/L
65/ 9/ 7
65/ 9/29
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
14
4.
3.
4.
4.
OATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
65/ 9/ 7
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
01070
01075
01080
01085
01090
01105
31501
31505
31615
31616
PHOS-T
SILVER
STRONTUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
TOT COLI
TOT COL I
FEC COLI
FEC COLI
P-SPEC
AG.DISS
SR.DISS
V.D1SS
ZN.DISS
AL.TOT
MFIMENDO
MPN CONF
MPNECMED
MFM-FCBR
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
/100ML
/100ML
14
14
130000.
1700.
700.
200.
17014.
450.
7601.
340.
65/ 9/29
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121990
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVES CHATTAHOOCHEE AT US HMY 27 FRNKL
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE C-l
1113S050 2111204
00002
00007
00010
00020
00060
00070
00095
00300
00301
00304
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
DISTANCE
HATER
AIR
STREAM
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
DO
ROD
FROM
« FROM
FR V
TEMP
TEMP
FLOW
JKSN
AT 25C
SATUR
2 DAY
TO
RT BANK
MILES
CENT
CENT
CUFT/SEC
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
PERCENT
MG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER
27
13
29
14
22
21
MAXIMUM
20.0
25.0
7150.
70.
10.6
100.0
MINIMUM
2.8
8.0
1860.
39.
7.0
74.0
MEAN
13.2
17.8
3666.
57.
8.8
82.1
LOG MEAN
11.4
16.8
3257.
56.
8.8
81.8
66/ ?/ 6
00305
00310
00400
00403
00410
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
DATE PARAMETER
BOD
BOD
PH
LAB
T ALK
PESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
FROM
3 OAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
TO
MG/L
MG/L
SU
SU
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
64/10/19
NUMBER
7
21
14
MAXIMUM
4.2
7.00
18.
MINIMUM
1.8
6.50
10.
MEAN
2.7
6.84
15.
LOG MEAN
2.6
6.84
15.
66/ 2/ 6
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
01000
01005
01010
01020
01025
DATE PARAMETER
N021N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLIUM
BORON
CADMIUM
FROM
N
P04
P04
C
CL
ASaOISS
BAtOISS
HE.DISS
BtDlSS
CIHDISS
TO
MG/L
>4G/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
64/10/19
number
2
MAXIMUM
4.
MINIMUM
3.
MEAN
3.
LOO MEAN
3.
66/ 2/ 6
01070
01075
01080
01085
01090
01105
31501
31505
31615
31616
DATE PARAMETER
PHOS-T
SILVER
STRONTUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
ALUMINUM
TOT COLI
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
FEC COLI
FROM
P-SPEC
AGvDISS
SRtDISS
VtDISS
ZN.OISS
ALtTOT
MFIMENDO
MPN CONF
MPNECMED
MFM-FCBR
T0
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
/lftOML
/100ML
*4/10/19
66/ ?/ A
NUMBER
7
44
7
7
MAXIMUM
285000.
1600000.
23000.
6600.
MINIMUM
155000.
15000.
5000.
1400.
MEAN
234286.
328568.
14714.
4238.
LOG MEAN
226971.
175250.
13478.
3623.
-------
APPENDIX D
A Brief Biological Survey of the Chattahoochee River
and Selected Tributary Streams
by
William M. Beck, Jr.
June 1965
-------
D-2
During June 1965 a brief biological survey was made of the Chattahoochee River
and selected tributary streams for the purpose of determining the biological quality
of the waters in question. This survey was requested by the Atlanta office of the
Public Health Service
The period selected for this survey was predictably ideal in light of weather
records for past years but, unfortunately, proved to be a time of unseasonably high
rainfall, at least for the early part of the survey. This resulted in many of the
proposed areas of the Chattahoochee River, especially in the middle and lower
sections, proving to be either inaccessible or unworkable.
Results are presented in Table I which gives station numbers, locations, and
condition. It was felt that use of any scheme for reporting (the Biotic Index,
for example) was hardly worth while in view of the fact that the Chattahoochee
River within the area of this survey has reaches that are typical trout streams
as well as areas under impoundment with no flow at all. In this report condition
will be given as fine, satisfactory, questionable, poor, and grossly polluted.
In addition, certain conditional terms will be marked with an asterisk. This
designates the fact that these particular evaluations need further discussion.
TABLE I
Station
Stream
Countv
State
Condition
C-l 6-18
Chattahoochee R.
White
Ga.
Fine
C-2 6-18
Chattahoochee R.
White
Ga.
Fine
6-3 6-19
Chattahoochee R.
Gwinnett
Ga.
Satisfactory*
C-4 6-20
Chattahoochee R.
Fulton
Ga.
Fine
fc-5 6-20
Chattahoochee R.
Cobb
Ga.
Grossly polluted sewage
C-6 6-20
Sweetwater Creek
Douglas
Ga.
Fine
-------
D-3
TABLE I (cont
*d)
Station
Stream
County
State
Condition
C-7**6-21
Chattahoochee R.
Heard
Ga.
Questionable
C-8**6-21
Yellowjacket Cr.
Troup
Ga.
Fine
C-9 6-21
Long Cane Creek
Troup
G£l.
Questionable*
C-10 6-22
Flat Shoals Cr.
Harris
Ga.
Fine
C-ll 6-22
Sand Creek
Harris
Ga •
Fine
C-12 6-22
Mulberry Creek
Harris
Ga*
Satisfactory
C-13 6-23
Chattahoochee R.
Chattahoochee
Ga.
Questionable*
C-14 6-23
Chattahoochee R.
Chattahoochee
Ga.
Questionable*
C-15 6-23
Upatoie Creek
Chattahoochee
Ga.
Satisfactory
C-16 6-24
Uchee Creek
Russell
Ala.
Fine
C-17 6-24
S. Fork Cowikee
Creek
Barbour
Ala.
Satisfactory
C-18 6-25
Pataula Creek
Quitman
Ga •
Satisfactory
C-19 6-25
Small Creek
Quitman
Ga.
Fine
C-20 6-25
Chattahoochee R.
Henry
Ala.
Questionable*
C-21 6-25
Abbie Creek
Henry
Ala.
Fine
C-22 6-25
Chattahoochee R.
Houston
Ala.
Poor
C-23 6-25
Chattahoochee R.
Houston
Ala.
Grossly polluted
C-24 6-25
Chattahoochee R.
Jackson
Fla.
Satisfactory
** Correspond to Stations 12 and 8, respectively, in 1971 EPA report.
... To summarize briefly, the Chattahoochee River was found to be grossly
polluted at stations C-5 and C-23, evidence of lesser pollution was found at
stations C-7, C-13, and C-14, the remaining stations in this river proving to be
in satisfactory condition. . . .
-------
D-4
Location of Stations for Report by William M. Beck, Jr., June, 1965, "A Brief
Biological Survey of the Chattahoochee River and Selected Tributary Streams."
by Wilburn F. Holsomback
Station &
STORET No. Stream Location
C-7 Chattahoochee River Inside City of Franklin, Georgia, at bridge on
Ga. Hwy. 1 in Heard County.
C-8 Yellowjacket Creek County Rd. (Mill Wares Rd.) approx. 4 miles
N.W. of LaGrange, Ga. 1 mile W. of water works
in Troup County.
RAW DATA
Chattahoochee River. Station C-7. Heard County. Georgia:
Class I:
Class II: Amphipoda
Class III: Physa, Sphaeriidae, 2 Oligochaeta
Class IV: bettle ad., Veliidae
Class V: Hirudinea, mayfly n.
Yellow jacket Creek, Station C-8. Troup County,
Class I: Stenonema, Simuliidae, Psectrocladius
Class II: Gomphus, Cheumatopsyche, Hyalella azteca, Procladius
Class III: Oligochaeta, Ceratopogonidae
Class IV: Veliidae, Corixidae, Gerridae, bettle larvae, Elmid ad.
Class V: Hexagenia, Hirudinea, 4 mayfly n., Atherix, Crypotochironomus,
Polypedilum, Tanytarsus
-------
APPENDIX E
Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data
Chattahoochee River Basin
August and September 1970
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121910-A CH-01A
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER CHATTA R WEST POINT ABOVE US29
GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00300
00410
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00304
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
00
T ALK
LAR
CNDUCTVY
TURR
COLOR
ROD
ROD
from
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 DAY
? DAY
TO
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MICROMHO
JU
PT-CO-U
MG/L
MG/L
70/ 9/11
NIJMRFR
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
1
MAXIMUM
33.
28.0
7.4
18.
7.1
78.
78.
30.
0.6
0.4
MINIMUM
33.
?3.0
5.2
13.
6.8
41.
12.
10.
0.4
0.4
MEAN
33.
24.3
6.6
15.
6.9
58.
42.
16. *
0.5
0.4
LOG MEAN
33.
24.3
6.6
15.
6.9
57.
36.
14.
0.5
0.4
70/ 9/18
00650
00653
00625
00610
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
O0530
DATE PARAMETER
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N02&N03
CHLORIOE
T ORG C
RESiniiF
RFSTDUF
RFSlnUF
FROM
P04
"04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NtJMRER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.41
0.26
0.670
0.480
0.6
4.
6.0
163.
oq.
*8.
MINIMUM
0.23
0.19
0.220
0.020
0.5
3.
3.0
45.
14.
19.
MEAN
0.30
0.16
0.432
0.233
0.6
4.
4.5
100.
53.
46.
LOG MEAN
0.30
0.15
0.402
0.186
0.6
4.
4.4
93.
47.
44.
70/ 9/18
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
04 TE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
COLIFORM
EEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FE.OISS
MN
MN.OISS
IMEDENDO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
number
10
10
10
10
8
9
MAXIMUM
6300.
200.
340.0
70.0
21000.
1300.
MINIMUM
600.
100.
60.0
20.0
500.
10.
MEAN
3190.
157.
192.0
39.0
9825.
634.
LOG MEAN
2475.
15?.
165.9
35.6
6412.
359.
70/ 9/13
-------
WEST POINT STUOY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
121910-B
CH-OIR
CHATTA R WEST POINT AROVE US29
11 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
oono?
00010
00300
00410
0040"*
00095
00070
70515
on^io
00304
OATF PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
no
T ALK
LAR
CNOUCTVY
TURR
COLOR
ROD
ROD
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 OAY
2 OA Y
TO
RT RANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MICROMHO
JU
PT-CO-II
MR/L
MG/L
70/ 8/11
number
10
in
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
2
MAXIMUM
66.
28.0
7.5
19.
7.1
82.
71.
30.
0.8
0.2
MINIMUM
66.
23.0
5.6
14.
6.6
51.
.12.
10.
0.2
0.2
MEAN
66.
24.3
6.7
15.
6.9
61.
37.
18.
0.5
0.2
LOG MEAN
6*,.
24.3
6.6
15.
6.9
61.
31.
16.
0.4
0.2
70/ 9/18
««««#«« »«»«#»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» »»»»»»»»»» »»«»«»*»«»»»«»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
00650
00653
00625
00ft 10
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
no^O
DATE PARAMETER
T P04
S0LPO4-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N02S.N03
CHLORIOE
T ORG C
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
MFSinUF
FROM
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NELT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
C Mr,/L
Mfi/L
70/ 9/11
NIJMRER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
maximum
0.42
0.26
0.630
0.330
0.6
4.
5.0
154.
86.
68.
MINIMUM
0.?0
O.OB
0.270
0.110
0.5
3.
2.0
45.
10.
26.
"FAN
0.29
0.15
0.371
0.219
0.6
4.
3.4
96.
51.
45.
LOG MEAN
0.28
0.15
0.357
0.206
0.6
3.
3.2
90.
43.
44.
70/ 9/18
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
OATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
COLIEORM
EEC COL I
rPOM
TOTAL
EE.DISS
MN
MN.0IS5
IMEDENOO
ME-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ME/100ML
ME/1O0ML
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
9
9
MAXIMUM
6000.
250.
310.0
80.0
20000.
2000.
MINIMUM
700.
100.
no.o
20.0
1200.
130.
MEAN
3450.
174.
189.0
48.0
11544.
897.
LOG MEAN
2654.
166.
173.8
42.5
9240.
617.
70/ 9/1*
»*»*««»««««#»«»*•»**•**»«*»»»*»*»«*»
-------
wfST POINT STUOY 1?1911-A CH-02A
SOUTMFAST RFGIOM
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVFR CHATTAHOOCHEF R AT HAROLFY CR MO
GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
111 3S050 2111204
OATF
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT RANK
OO010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
omoo
00
MR/L
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAR
PH
SU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00070
TURR
JKSN
JU
7051 5
COLOR
PT-CO-II
oolio
ROD
5 HAY
MG/L
00304
oon
? DAY
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
maximum
MINIMUM
MF AN
LOG MEAN
9
33.
33.
33.
33.
8
28.0
23. 0
24.1
24. 1
8
7.4
5.6
6.6
6.6
9
17.
13.
14.
14.
9
7.0
6.8
6.9
6.9
9
78.
47.
59.
58.
9
63.
16.
37.
33.
9
30.
10.
17.
15.
1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.*
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
70/ 9/18
• •»«»*»««« *«»»»'» »»«« ««»«««
OATE
FROV
TO
parameter
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
006*53
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00630
M02&N03
N
MG/L
00940
CHLORIOE
CL
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00500
RFSIDUF
total
MG/L
0051*?
RFSTOUF
0ISS-10S
C MG/L
00^30
RFSinUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
70/ fl/n
NUMqFH
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MFAN
LOG MFAN
7
0.40
0.??
0.31
0.30
8
0.26
0.09
0.16
0.1*
7
0.390
0.210
0.307
0.30?
7
0.330
0.010
0.186
0.133
7
0.6
O.S
0.6
0.6
7
4.
3.
4.
4.
7
7.0
2.0
4.0
3.7
A
1*6.
54.
100.
94.
8
87.
22.
51.
48.
8
79.
24.
4*.
45.
70/ 9/18
»*•»«*«* tHKHHHHHtO »»« »»<>««» »«»-»«««»*«»» »««»«»»«««»«»«»*««» «»««»«»««« »«««««««-»«
OATF
FROM
TO
RARAMFTFR
010<»5
IRON
TOTAL
UG/L
01046
IRON
FE»OISS
UG/L
01055
MANGNESF
MN
UG/L
01056
MANGNESF
MN.DJSS
UG/L
31^01
COLTFORM
IMEOFNnO
MF/100ML
31616
FEC COL I
MF-C44.5
MF/100ML
70/ -i/11
NUMBER
7
8
7
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
6800.
300.
280.0
80.0
?70O0.
1600.
MINIMUM*
700.
100.
90.0
30.0
2400 •
100.
MFAN
3114.
178.
161.4
43.8
12113.
726.
LOG MEAN
2478.
165.
151.9
41.4
8907.
503.
70/ 9/1»
-------
WFST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST PFGION
OATTAHOOCH'Ff. »IVF«
CM-Q3B
cmattahoochef r at harolfy ca wn
11 GEORGIA
SOUTHFAST
CHATTAHOOCHEF
1U3S050 ?1U?04
OATF
PRO*
TO
da^AMFTFS
nnoo?
hsamploC
•«. FROM
^T RANK
00010
ulATF.R
TEMP
CENT
00300
00
MG/L
00410
T ALK
c Arm
MG/L
00403
LAR
PH
. SU
0009S
CNOUCTVY
AT ?SC
MICPOMHO
00070
tu»«
JKSN
JU
70S1S
COLOH
PT-CO-U
00310
POO
S HAY
"G/L
00104
»*on
3 OAY
MG/L
70/ «/n
NUMRf*
MAX IMUM
i^IMIMIJM
MF4«|
Lilf, MFAN
9
66.
66.
ft*,
ft*.
H
?h.o
*3.0
?4.1
?4. 1
*
7.4
S.6
6.6
6.6
9
17.
14.
15.
IS.
9
7.0
*.9
7.0
7.0
9
77.
47.
SH.
S7.
9
7ft.
1?.
40.
34.
9
3S.
10.
15.
16.
?
O.S
0.4
0.4
0.4
1
1 .*
1
1 .*
1 .A
71/ Q/Jn
OATF
"l)«
TO
^ArtAMFTE"
006SO
T P04
P04
MG/L
006S3
S0LP04-T
=04
MG/L
006?S
TOT KJFL
N
MG/L
0061 0
AMMONIA
NH3-N
mg/l
00630
Mn?*N0 3
N
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
00680
T OtfG c
C
MG/L
OOSOO
SFSIOIJF
TOTAL
MG/L
onsis
^FSTOIJF
oiss-io^
C MG/L.
00S30
ppsinuF
TOT NP"L T
MG/L
7*1/ R/1 1
"4X1 mum
u IM MtJM
MF»N
I. OS MF AN
7n/ 9/1^
»»»»»»«»>
3 A TF
rwrjM
TO
7
0.41
0.??
o.->?
0.31
7
0.?S
0.09
0.1*.
0.1^
7
0.S60
0 . ?60
0. 349
0. 33b
7
0.?90
0.130
0.?04
0.199
7
0.7
O.S
0.6
0.6
7
4.
3.
4.
4*
7
s.o
3.0
4.0
3.9
ft
159.
S4.
97.
93.
H
93.
1«.
SO.
46.
H
*<9.
4*.
4ft.
pA*AMFTFW
n]04S
TMON
TOTAL
UG/L
0 I 04*>
W.>M
FF.niSS
'JG/L
01 OSS
MANGNFSF
MN
UG/L
0 1 0S6
MANGNFSF
MN.OTSS
UG/L
31 SO 1
COL IFOUM
TMEnFNno
MF/lOOML
31616
FFC COLI
CF-C44.S
MF/1OOML
70/ A/1)
M | Jl^py
'! A X TM|JM
M
"FAN
I.O'i '*FAN
7
7400.
7S0.
3107.
?4P?.
H
ROO.
100.
?S8.
POO.
7
310.0
70.0
17?.9
1S6.0
7
90.0
10.0
SI.4
43. 3
40000.
?000.
1SSS0.
974?.
6
??00.
90.
979.
747.
7n/ o/)i
-------
«FST POINT STUOV
SOUTHFAST WFGION
C^flTTArtQOCHFp, <->IVE«
1?1913-A
CH-03A
CHATTAHOOCHEE * AT MAPLF C*. MO.
n GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
chattahoochef
nnsoso ?ui?04
«»«»««««» »»«»»«» »###««»#¦}» «»«««««« » » « »#««« »•»###»« •»« •»»»»»#» ««»»« «•««•#•#» #«««»« •»•»•»•»#««» »»»*« »»«-««»« « «»»
onoo?
00010
00300
004\0
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00304
")ATF PAPAMFTF"
HS4MPL0C
wATFR
no
T ALK
LAR
CNDUCTVY
TIJRO
OOLOU
non
POP
r»OM
<*. FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT ?5C
JKSN
5 OAY
? nAY
TO
ftT SANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
su
MIC^OMHO
JIJ
PT-CO-U
MG/L
Mfi/L
70/ H/l1
N'IMPFf?
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
Q
¦>
?
MAXIMUM
33.
28.0
7.6
Ift.
7.0
77.
73.
30.
0.7
n.4
MINIM!)M
V3.
?3.0
5.5
1 3.
ft.«)
49.
1?.
10.
0.4
o.l
'¦'FA IV
33.
24.?
ft.7 -
14.
ft."
57.
41.
17.
0.5
o.?
LOG MFflN
33.
?4.?
ft.7
14.
ft.9
57.
35.
IS.
0.5
o.?
70/ W/l^
00ft50
00ft53
006?S
OOftlO
00ft30
00940
OOftflO
00500
00515
00510
OATF HAkflMFTE*
T P04
S0LPO4-T
TOT KJFL
AMMONIA
N02R.N03
CHLORIOE
r ORG c
RFSIDUF
*FSTOUF
PFSinUF
FPOM
P04
°04
N
NH3-M
M
CL
c
TOTAL
OISS-105
TOT NFL
TO
«G/L
MG/.L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/L
MG/L
MG/L
C. Mr,/|.
MG/L
70/ X/ll
.Vi^apj
9
H
K
*
rt
fl
9
9
MAX IMUM
0 .A3
o.?ft
O.ftOO
0.370
O.ft
4.
ft.O
lftft.
98.
ftb.
I I'i I Mi )M
0.??
0.00
n.?oo
o.mo
o.s
3.
3.0
7?.
?4.
34.
*"F«N
0.33
0.15
0.334
0 . ?16
O.ft
4.
4.5
105.
55.
50.
l.OG MFAM
0.3?
0.11
0.317
o.?o?
O.ft
4.
4.4
10?.
51.
49.
70/ 9/18
TATF
FWf)M
TO
pAwAMFTFR
0 1 045
IRON
TOTAL
UG/L
01046
I WON
FE.DISS
JG/L
0105S
MftMGNFSh'
MM
UG/L
nms6
MANGNFSE
MN.OISS
UG/L
31501
COLIEOSM
IMEOFNOO
MF/100ML
3lftlft
FFC C0L1
MF-C44.S
MF/100ML
70/ «i/ll
*
9
3
9
«
«
MA
-------
•o^ST PQINT STUOY
SOUTHEAST PFGION
ChATTAHOOCHFR. PIVE*
i?i9n->3
CH-mn
CHATTAHOOCHFF •» AT maple C*. MO.
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHFAST
C.HATT AH00CHFF
1U3SOSO P111204
noon?
onoio
00300
ooaio
ooao3
0009s
00070
")ATF
FRO"
TO
70/ 3/U
70/ 9/ia
»««»»«»»
OATF
TO
70/ M/U
70/ q/l><
OATF
r»r)M
TO
70/ H/ll
70S1S
00110
KA^AMFTF"
HSAMPLOC
WATFSJ
00
T ALK
LAR
CNOUCTVY
TU»B
COLOR
son
ann
1 FROM
TFMP
CAC03
PH
AT ?SC
jksn
S OA Y
? nay
WT RANK
CENT
Mfi/L
Mr,/L
su
MICrtOMHO
JU
PT-CO-H
Mr,/L
"G/L
J
MMHOFR
>5
4
9
9
9
9
9
9
?
?
MAXIMUM
66.
?*. o
7.6
17.
7.0
7S.
78.
30.
o.s
0.7
"'INI Mi )M
66.
?3.o
S.6
] 3.
6.8
51 .
14.
10.
0.3
o.s
MFAN
66 .
24.?
6.*
1^.
7.0
S8.
41.
17.
0.4
0.6
LOG MF«N
i
66 .
?4.?
6. 7
IS.
7.0
S8.
34.
IS.
0.4
0.6
on6so
006S3
006?S
O0M0
OOIS30
00940
00680
0050O
00S1R
00^30
pa^AMFTFP
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N0?R.N03
CHLORIDE
T OHG C
SFsmuF
RFSIOUF
PFSIHUF
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
Oiss-io";
TOT NFLT
MCi/L
*G/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C Mr,/I.
mc,/l
IVjMPCt;
9
4
H
«
fl
H
9
9
9
MAXIMUM
0.4?
o.?s
0.400
0.??0
0.6
4.
6.0
1S7.
94.
69.
r.'INlWUM
0.?S
0.09
0 . ?30
o.oso
o.s
3.
?.o
63.
17.
?7.
rfC" AN
0.3?
0. IS
0.310
0. 1SS
0.6
3.
4.1
101 .
S4.
47.
LOG «F4M
i
0.31
0.1=;
0. 106
0.14?
0.6
3.
3.9
97.
4H .
AS.
144t44e9»4«44 4444J»4«4il»*444 4»»4»e4«4»4»i««»4S»«444»it«4(Ht»»4»«4«4»#444«»»»««»»4««4»«v4»44(t
01 04S
0 1046
010SS
01O56
31S01
31616
~M^A^FT^W
I«0M
IRON
MAMGNFSf
MAN5NFSF
COLIEOWM
FFC COL I
TOTAL
ff.diss
Mi\J
MN.OISS
imfofndo
MF-C44.S
U6/I-
ur,/L
llfi/L
UG/L
MF/1OOML
MF/]OOML
fV
*
9
9
7
H
MAXIMUM
7600.
3*0.
3?0 . 0
lon.o
?4000 .
1900.
MINIMIjM
inoo.
130.
«0.0
30.0
3«00.
110.
«FAN
3613.
?19.
178.8
6?.?
10014.
*??9.
LOG MF4M
?799.
?10.
16?.*
Sfl.S
84>U .
584.
i
H> • «««««« »*•»¦»¦&•»»»»•»*»»•»»»ft #
44«»»4444444»*4»44444»4(t»»44«4«S4»»»44444»444«»4444»44444444
-------
v»FST POINT ST'IOY
SOOTHFAST RFGION
Ch4TT AhQOCHFF~ RIVER
1;>191<3
CH-04
^F^OKEF CR HWY ?uu w LAGRANGE
13 GFO«GIA
SOOTHFAST
CHATTAHOOCHEF
unsnso ani?w
OATF
FMOM
TO
PAWAMETFB
onno?
MSAMPLOC
<* FROM
rtT RaNK
00010
WATFR
TFMP
CENT
00300
no
Mfi/L
00410
T ALK
cacot
MG/L
0040 3
LAH
PH
SU
00095
CNOUCTVY
AT ?5C
MICROMHO
ono70
TURR
JKSN
JiJ
7051=:
COLOP
PT-CO-U
00310
nor>
5 OAY
mr/l
OQ104
qon
? DAY
wR/L
70/ S/U
MU»4i»FP
"AXIMUM
MtNIMlIM
MEAN
LOG MFAM
10
?7.0
??.S
?1.9
?3.9
10
B.S
7.3
7.H
7.8
10
?3.
18.
PI .
10
7.P
7.0
7.1
7.1
10
69.
44.
55.
55.
10
70.
?0.
?9.
?6.
10
40.
10.
??.
?0.
?
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
?
n.3
0.1
0.?
0.?
70/ q/^
HATE
F»0-«
TO
PARAMETER
00650
T P04
P04
*G/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00S?S
TOT KJEL
"J
MG/L
OOMO
AMMONIA
NH3-M
MG/L
00630
N02S.N03
N
Mr,/L
00940
CHLORIOF
CL
MG/L
00680
ORG c
C
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
PFSintJF
0ISS-105
C mq/I.
00530
RESIDUE
TOT MFLT
MG/L
70/ R/]1
NlJ^flFR
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.08
O.O?
0.630
0.100
0.?
3.
10.0
105.
*1.
*>7.
"rNIMIJM
0.01
0.00
0.140
0.010
0.?
?.
?.o
55.
5.
•««.
MF AN
0.03
0.01
0.?75
0.141
0.?
?.
4.1
74.
??.
^3.
LOG MFAN
0.03
0.01
0.?3H
Oil 06
0.?
?.
3.7
73.
1*.
5?.
70/ ««»««««»»»«««»»4»«««»»«<» »«»
-------
joint
5 hay
Mr,/L
00304
non
"» oay
MG/L
70/ •4.0
ft.4
IS.
7.0
59.
4Q.
1*.
0.9
0.5
I,or, «FAM
33.
?4.0
ft.*
IS.
7.0
59.
38.
14.
0.9
0.5
71/ !>/!*
¦*«»»»«»«»
*«»«»»«»»»»««*«»•»«»•»«*
OOftSO
00ft53
OOft?S
OOftlO
00*30
00940
00*80
00500
00515
00530
")ATf fA^A^FTF"
T P04
SOLP04-T
TOT KJFL
AMMONIA
NO?M4Q3
CHLOWIOF
T 096 C
WFSinilF
«FSIOUF
BFSinUF
r jfiM
P04
»04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
niss-105
TOT NFLT
T"
Mr,/L
M(i/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/l
MG/L
'.|l |M.'lP ~t
1 1
10
10
in
]0
10
10
10
10
10
'•¦A* 1 Ml |M
n.4=;
o.?n
0.4*0
0.300
0.7
4.
1 1.0
?24.
Iftft.
5H .
•-¦IHIM.fM
n.??
0.01
O.PIO
o.bio
0.0
3.
?.o
4ft.
11.
31.
«-"F Ifl
n.3?
0.13
0 . 3?7
0.1 *9
0.5
3.
5.7
U«.
73.
44.
L )<¦> MF AN
0.31
(1.10
0.31 7
0.109
0.4
3.
5.?
10ft.
5ft.
44.
01145
0 1 04ft
01 OSS
0105ft
31501
3161*1
Hwl 1F1FJ
I WON
I WON
MANGNFSF
MANCjNFSF
COLIFO»M
FFC COLI
total
Ff.DTSS
MN
mn.hiss
IMFDFNDO
MF-C44.5
i)G/l
JG/L
iJG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
10
10
10
10
9
9
A * I IM
1 ftono.
?ftn.
540.0
?40 . 0
50000.
5100.
T 1 ».*! jM
?oo.
ion.
30.0
10.0
1900.
680.
t'SN
5 700.
170.
?0«.n
73.0
1585ft.
?05?.
•H- '
-------
WEST POINT 5TU0Y
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. river
l?l920-6
c.h-05«
CHATTAHOOCHEE R GA ?38 W OF LAGR
n GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
• »»«««««*»»««» «««-»«»««««»»««»¦»««»»»«»»»»»»
00002
00010
00300
00410
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00^04
, r>ATF PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
DO
T ALK
LAB
CNDUCTVY
TURR
COLOR
BOO
BOO
' F»OM
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 HAY
2 DAY
TO
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MICROMHO
JU
PT-CO-U
MG/L
MG/L
70/ /)/n
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
2
MAXIMUM
66.
?7.0
6.2
15.
7.1
67.
125.
35.
1.5
0.5
minimum
66.
22. 0
6.1
14.
7.0
44.
15.
10.
0.7
0.5
MFAN
66.
?4. 0
6.9
15.
7.1
59.
48.
16.
1 .0
0.5
LOG mean
66.
24. 0
6.9
15.
7.1
59.
37.
14.
0.9
0.5
70/ 9/l«
*•»•••••«•*•»••««•***«<•*•«•.*•« »»»»¦»»»»»»«•»»«»»»¦&« «•»««¦»•»¦»»»«•»¦»»«¦»»«•¦»« »*»»»«•«»»•«»«*•• ¦»«»»»«»»~»»»»
00650
00653
00625
00610
00630
009i»0
00680
00500
00515
00530
OATF PARAMETER
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N02S.N03
CHLORIDE
T ORG C
RESIDUF
RESIDUE
RESIOUF
FROM
P04
P04
N
MH3-N
N
CL
c
TOTAL
0ISS-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
Mf,/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ 8/1]
NUMBf.R
10
10
10
1ft
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.41
0.19
0.600
0.410
0.7
4.
7.0
202.
159.
^9.
MINIMUM
0.21
0.01
0.230
0.130
0.4
3.
3.0
52.
16.
27.
ME AN
0.3?
0.13
0.410
0.263
0.6
3.
4.B
109.
A6.
<*3.
LOG MFAN
0.31
0.10
0.392
0.250
0.6
3.
4.5
100.
53.
42.
70/ 9/18
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
OATF PAHAMETE"
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNF5E
COLIFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FE.OISS
MN
MNI.OTSS
IMEOF.NOO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ M/U
MJMRER
10
10
10
10
8
9
MAXIMUM
15000.
280.
360.0
70.0
42000.
5200.
MINIMUM
1000.
100.
70.0
10.0
2500.
440.
MEAN
5160.
167.
163.0
47.0
15150.
1766.
LOG MFAN
34AR.
155.
144.1
41.7
10711.
1271.
70/ «»/!»
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
121938-A
CH-06A
CHATT R GA HWY 109 K OF LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
»««««««««»«««»•*»«»«««*««««»•»«««««»«««««»*«««»«»•»•«•«»
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
MSAMPLOC
* FROM
RT BANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
DO
MG/L
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAH
PH
SU
00095
CNOUCTVY
AT ?5C
MICROMHO
00070
TURP
JKSN
JU
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-U
00310
pon
5 DAY
Mfi/L
00304
won
? DAY
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
maximum
minimum
MEAN
LOG MEAN
70/ 9/1*
10
33.
33.
33.
33.
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
10
25.5
22.0
23.9
23.9
10
8.4
5.3
7.1
7.0
10
?0.
12.
17.
lft.
10
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
10
74.
4ft.
SB.
57.
10
100.
15.
4ft.
38.
10
40.
10.
lft.
14.
3
l.l
0.7
0.9
0.9
?
0.7
0.4
n.s
0.5
00ft53
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
OOMO
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00ft30
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
00680
T OUG C
C
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RES I Dl If
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESinUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.40
0.23
0.500
0.440
o.«
4.
10.0
189.
138.
63.
MINIMUM
0.17
0.0ft
0.220
0.010
0.3
2.
2.0
54.
lft.
•15.
MEAN
0.30
0.15
0.359
0.227
0.5
3.
5.6
113.
69.
^4.
LOG MEAN
0.29
0.14
0.347
0.174
0.5
3.
5.1
105.
60.
40.
70/ 9/18
«4**«*«44»44»4444»>4»4»«««9«l>««»«4ft««444»«4«0ft«4>»«»»«>4<)4»4««««4«««4«4«44<><)«<>«4«<>
-------
fFST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
121938-R
CH-06B
CHATT R 6ft HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGF
GEORGIA
SOOTHFAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
11135050 77777777
»*«**•*•**»*«••••«««*»«*»«•**»»»•»»•««»»•*«»»»•»»«««««»««»«»« »»»•»¦»» »»««•»«
OATE
FROM
TO
pawamfter
00002
HSAMPLOC
* FROM
RT BANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
DO
MG/L
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00070
TURR
JKSN
JU
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-IJ
(10310
ROD
5 DAY
MG/L
00304
Ron
? day
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NUMRER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
70/ 9/1 ft
10
66.
66.
66.
10
?5.5
22.0
23.9
23.9
9
8.5
6.2
7.0
7.0
DATE PARAMETFR
FROM
TO
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
10
18.
12.
14.
14.
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
10
7.1
6.9
7.1
7.1
10
71.
46.
57 .
57.
10
125.
15.
53.
41.
10
4S.
10.
16.
14.
2
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.9
2
1 .3
0.7
1.0
1.0
**«-«•»*«*«*»»«»»•»*«»««* »««««»»« »»»»»«««««
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RFSIDUF
TOT NFLT
MG/L
70/ 8/11
70/ 9/18
NUMREH
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.46
0.24
0.600
0.580
0.8
5.
13.0
215.
171.
68.
MINIMUM
0.22
0.09
0.260
0.110
0.4
3.
3.0
52.
16.
21 .
MEAN
0.35
0.17
0.428
0.280
0.6
3.
6.5
120.
77.
43.
LOG MEAN
0.34
0.16
0.415
0.255
0.6
3.
5.7
110.
64.
40.
DATF PARAMETER
FROM
TO
01045 01046 01055 01056 31501
IRON IRON MANGNESE MANGNESE COLIFORM EEC COLI
TOTAL FEtOISS MN MM.DISS IMEDENDO MF-C44.5
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L MF/100ML MF/100ML
31616
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
8
9
MAXIMUM
15500.
260.
360.0
100.0
40000.
3700.
MINIMUM
1000.
100.
100.0
20.0
4400.
460.
MEAN
4950.
165.
205.0
53.0
19550.
2159.
L06 MEAN
3587.
156.
192.3
48.9
15595.
1779.
TO/ 9/18
-------
WF.ST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHFEt RIVFR
121939
CH-07
CHATTAHOOCHEE R
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050
AT LAG WATER INT
2111204
DATE
fhom
TO
PARAMETER
noon?
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT RANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
00
Mr,/L
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAR
PH
SO
00095
CNOUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00070
TURR
JKSN
JU
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-IJ
00310
POO
S DAY
MG/L
00304
ROD
? DAY
MG/L
70/ 8/11
NUMRFR
maximum
MINIMUM
MfAN
LOG MrAN
10
s.
5.
5.
5.
10
?S.O
21.0
23.4
23.4
9
8.0
6.0
7.0
ft.9
10
16.
11.
14.
13.
10
7.3
6.9
7.1
7.1
10
70.
44.
57 •
56.
10
130.
23.
54.
47.
10
40.
10.
17.
15.
3
I .0
0.*
0.8
0.8
2
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.9
70/ 0/18
ooito-innnt »»»«»«»*»»»»»»»»» »» »»»»»»»»#»» »»»»«»««•»»»»»»»*»»»»*»#»»»*######»»#•»#*•»«••»» *»»#*» ###«¦#»•»¦»¦»»»»#»#
DATE
FWOM
TO
PARAMETFR
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00500
RESIDUF
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
70/ H/ll
NUMRF»
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.45
0.18
1.030
0.720
0.8
5.
9.0
223.
174.
64.
MINIMUM
0.25
0.07
0.380
0.170
0.4
3.
4.0
62.
30.
14.
mean
0.35
0.14
0.630
0.400
0.6
4.
5.5
117.
76.
42.
LOG MEAN
0.34
0.14
0.595
0.364
0.6
4.
5.4
107.
67.
38.
70/ 9/1B
»*»»»***«»««»*«»#»»«•»•
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
DATE PARAMFTFR
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
COL IFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FF,DISS
MN
MN»OISS
IMEDENOO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
IJG/L
UG/L
me/IOOML
MF/10OML
70/ R/ll
NUMRFR
10
10
10
10
9
9
MAXIMUM
12800.
260.
300.0
100.0
72000.
5700.
MINIMUM
1200.
50.
130.0
20.0
9400.
1000.
MCAN
4790.
168.
220.0
49.0
33767.
2867.
LOG MFAN
3691.
153.
212.0
43.7
25999.
2321.
70/ 9/l«
-------
«*st fOiNT study
SOOTHFAST rfgion
ChATTAmOOChFF.
121940
CH-08
YFLLOV JACKET C« S2098 W OF LAG"
11 GEORGIA
SOIJTHF AST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
OATF
r^QM
TO
71/ 8/n
PAwA»»
0000?
HSAMPLOC
* FROM
i?T RANK
MijmaFR
MA* 1VIIM
MI'lIMIIM
mfan
IOG MfAN
00010
rfATFR
TEMP
CENT
10
?6. 0
!*1.5
?3.4
23.4
0O300
00
MG/L
10
8. 8
6.9
7*6
7.6
00410
T ALK
CAC&3
MG/L
10
3?.
??.
?8.
?7.
00403
LA8
PH
SU
10
7.3
A.8
7.?
7.?
00095
CNOUCTVY
AT ?5C
MICHOMHO
10
93.
54.
71.
70.
00070
TURR
JKSN
JU
10
110.
1«.
44.
36.
70515
COLOft
PT-CO-ll
10
40.
10.
21.
20.
00310
Ron
S DAY
MG/L
3
0.8
0.6
0.6
00304
won
? DAY
MG/L
?
1 .0
0.4
0.7
0.6
70/ Q/JH
00650
00653
006?5
00610
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
00530
1ATF t>A4A*FTFR
T PO«
50LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N0?&N03
chloride
T OKG C
*FSIOUF
RFSTDUF
RFSIOUF
F«0«
P04
i»04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
OISS-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ -1/11
h|l imhfu
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAV IMIJM
0.3?
0.?3
1.810
1.1 ?o
0.5
ft •
7.0
15?.
87.
71.
MINIMUM
0.0*
0.0?
0.?00
0.1 ?0
0.?
?.
4.0
66.
15.
43.
MP »N
0.18
0.09
0.660
0.425
0.3
3.
5.1
101.
4?.
*9.
I.OG MFAN
0.17
0.06
0.494
0.314
0.3
3.
5.0
98.
36.
«;8.
70/ <»/1*
01045
0]046
01055
01056
31501
31616
•»ATF PAkAMFTFO
IRON
IRON
MANGNFSE
MANGNESP
COLIFORM
FPC COLI
rwoM
TOTAL
FF.OISS
MN
MN.0I5S
imfdfnoo
MF-C44.5
TO
IJ6/L
JG/L
IIG/L
UG/L
MF/I (10 ML MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
70/ 4/1*
NIJMQFft
10
10
10
. 10
a
9
MAXIMUM
8600.
500.
600.0
^M.O «
7O000.
8200.
MINIMUM
1600.
l?o.
270.0
60.0
7000.
2600.
••FAN
3850.
2*0.
352.0
120.0
332*50.
462?.
LOG MFAN
3?07.
248.
339.9
107.?
27710.
4292.
»••••«
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
chattahoochfe. river
121945
CH-09
YELLOW JACKET CR NE LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
••»~»»»»«#»~•«»»»»•»»»»¦»¦»«»*»»»»•»»»*»»»»#•»•»»»~»»»»»»»»¦»»*«»»»#»»»«•«¦» «¦»»««•»»»«*« • •»«*»*«»»*«»«» «»»•»»
-------
WFST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
121960-A
CH-10A
CHATT R GA HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
11 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
DATE
FROM
TO
70/ 8/11
PArtAMFTE»
NUMRFR
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
O0O02
HSAMPLOC
* FROM
AT RANK
10
33.
13.
33.
33.
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
10
2*.n
?1.0
23.7
23.*
00300
no
MG/L
10
4.
*.1
105.
ft 0.
41.
70/ 9/18
»•»•»•»«»•«»»»*»«*»«»»#»»*»#~»»#*»»»«*»#»*»~#•*«»»«»#*»»*»•»**»«*«*»»#~«*»»*•»*»««**#»**»»»**»»«»•»#«»»»»•»»«»#»»»»«****»
01045
01046
01055
01056
31«501
31616
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESF
MANGNESE
COLIFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FE.OISS
• MN
MN.DISS
IMEDFNDO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
<1
9
MAXIMUM
10400.
250.
380.0
70.0
64000.
5900.
MINIMUM
1000.L
40.
110.0
10.0
8000.
900.
MEAN
4620.
137.
220.0
39.0
26750.
2978.
LOG MEAN
3632.
120.
201.0
33.5
20747.
2310.
70/ 9/18
-------
tfFST POINT STUDY 121960-R CH-10*
SOUTHEAST REGION
CmATTAHOOCHFE. RIVER CHATT R GA HtrfY 819 N W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
*)ATF PARAMETER
PROM
TO
70/ - ATF PARAMFTFH
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJFL
AMMONIA
N02*N03
CHLORIOE
T ORG C
RESIDUE
RESinUE
RFSIOUF
tqom
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
OISS-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MR/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
mg/L
70/ 8/11
NHMUFW
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.55
0.?4
1.100
0.79O
0.8
5.
10.0
196.
149.
60.
MINIMUM
0.2?
0.12
0.330
0.170
0.4
3.
4.0
57.
?3.
?5.
MF AN
0.37
0.15
0.645
0.47?
0.6
4.
5.8
116.
72.
44.
LOG MEAN
0.36
0.15
0.591
0.425
0.6
4.
5.6
107.
60.
43.
70/ 9/1*
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
ftATF PARAMETER
I HON
IRON
MANGNFSF
MANGNESE
COLIFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FE.OISS
MN
MN.OISS
tmeofnoo
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/l
JG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
Mi imhFR
10
10
10
10
8
8
maximum
10900.
220.
360.0
50.0
62000.
5000.
MINIMUM
iaoo.
50.
100.0
10.0
6100.
730.
MFAN
4460.
138.
217.0
39.0
25388.
2716.
LOG MEAN
3340.
124.
199.9
35.3
20059.
2102.
70/ 9/18
00002
HSAMPLOC
« FROM
RT RANK
00010
WATER
TFMP
CENT
00300
no
MG/L
00*10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAR
PH
SU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
ooo ro
TURB
JKSN
JU
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-U
00310
ROO
5 DAY
"G/L
00304
Ron
¦? DAY
MG/L
10
66.
66.
66.
*6.
10
26.5
21.0
23. a
23.7
10
7.3
5.0
6.5
6.4
10
IB.
13.
14.
14.
10
7.2
*>.9
7.0
7.0
10
84.
48.
60.
59.
10
120.
17.
55.
45.
10
45.
10.
16.
14.
2
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
?
1.0
0.8
n.9
0.9
-------
«FST POINT STUDY 12198q CH-H
SOOTHfAST REGION
CHATTAMOOCHFE* RIVER NFW R US ?7 5 OF FRANKLIN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
**•*••••••«•••*«••*»«•»»««•»««»»«»«»»*«»«»»»•««»««»«««»«»«»»«»»»«««»»«»«««»«»««««««»««««»««»«»«»«»««»«««««»«»««»»»«»««««
OOOfl?
00010
00300
0O410
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00304
1ATF PARAMFTER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
00
T ALK
LAR
CNOUCTVY
TURR
COLOR
ROO
ROO
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 OAY
? OAY
TO
RT RANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MICROMHO
JU
PT-CO-U
mg/l
MG/L
70/ A/11
number
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
MAXIMUM
2S.0
8.3
33.
7.3
110.
57.
45.
0.5
1.0
MINIMUM
21.5
5.6
18.
7.0
59.
10.
10.
0.2
0.9
MEAN
23.3
7.2
28. *
7.2
84.
23.
19.
0.3
0.9
LOG MEAN
23. 2
7.2
27 .
7.2
82.
20.
17.
0.3
O.U
70/ 9/1 ft
•••«•»•»»••»•»•»•»«»»•»«•»»»«»»»¦»»»»•»*»»•»*»»«»•»«»•»»»#»»**»»¦»»»«»¦»¦»~¦»«»«•»»»»»«¦»**«»«»*«««•» »»»»#«* »»«««»««»»»«« »»««»»«««»««»»
00650
00653
0O625
00610
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
00530
DATE PARAMETER
T POA
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N02&N03
CHLORIDE
T ORG C
3FSIDUF
RESIOUF
RFSinUE
FROM
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ fl/ll
MU^FR
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.35
0 .29
0.950
0.540
0.2
4.
11.0
101.
56.
90.
MINIMUM
0.24
0.1?
0.150
0.040
0.1
2.
4.0
69.
8.
39.
MEAN
0.30
0.19
0.474
0.254
0.1
3.
5.8
85.
22.
63.
LOG MFAN
0 .29
0. IB
0.404
0.201
0.1
3.
5.5
84.
18.
61.
70/ 9/18
01045
0104ft
01055
01056
31501
31616
OATF PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
COLIEORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
EE.DISS
MN
MN.OISS
IMEOENDO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
mf/iooml
MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
NlfMaFH
10
10
10
10
8
8
MAXIMUM
3000.
420.
470.0
140.0
30000.
3600.
MINIMUM
850.
150.
160.0
40.0
1200.
130.
mean
1725.
272.
253.0
92.0
10438.
1086.
LOG MFAN
1577.
257.
241.4
85.5
6964.
477.
70/ 9/1*
-------
«FST POINT STU&V
SOUTHFAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
121992-A
CH-12A
CH4TT R AT US ?7 FRANKLIN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
>»»»»««-»««»»<»» »«»«««»«•*»»«««•••
0000?
00010
00300
00410
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00304
OATF PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
HATER
00
T ALK
LAfi
CNOUCTVV
TURB
COLOR
BOO
800
PROM
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 DAY
? DAY
TO
RT RANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
su
MICROMHO
JU
PT-CO-U
MG/L
MG/L
70/ 8/]l
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
2
MAXIMUM
33.
27.0
8.4
?3.
7.?
92.
72.
30.
?.l
1 .4
MINIMUM
33.
21.0
3.4
1?.
6.9
4ft.
15.
10.
0.5
0.7
MEAN
33.
23.9
6.1
1ft.
7.0
64.
37.
15.
1.5
1.0
LOG MF AN
33.
23.9
5.9
IS.
7.0
63.
33.
14.
1.3
1.0
70/ 9/lf
006S0
00653
00625
OOMO
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
00530
TATF PARAMFTEP
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N02S.N03
CHLORIDE
T ORG C
RESIDUE
RFSIDIJF
RFSinuF
FROM
PO 4
P04
N
NH3-N
M
CL
C
TOTAL
0I5S-105
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ K/l|
NUMQFR
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAX fMWM
0.76
0. 38
1.720
1.700
0.9
6.
11.0
172.
130.
55.
MINIMUM
0.23
0.13
0.300
0.200
0.4
3.
3.0
53.
16.
26.
MF AN
0.39
0.1H
A.8?3
0.631
0.5
4.
6.6
100.
55.
45.
LOG MFAN
0.36
0.17
0.710
0.511
0.5
4.
6.1
95.
47.
44.
70/ 9/1*
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
OATF PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
.MANGNESE
COL IFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
EE.OISS
MN
MN.OISS
IMEOFNOO
ME-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ME/100ML
ME/100ML
7ft/ H/h
N< iwER
10
10
10
10
8
8
MAXIMUM
8000.
220.
380.0
60.0
130000.
23000.
MINIMUM
1000.
*0.
70.0
10.0
5700.
900.
MEAN
2560.
142.
1*4.0
39.0
38338.
6225.
LOG MEAN
2135.
132.
163.2
35. 8
24020.
2918.
70/ 9/JH
-------
WFST POINT STUDY 121992-B CH-12R
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER CHATT R AT US 27 FRANKLIN
11 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
00002
00010
OO300
00410
00403
00095
00070
70515
00310
00304
OATF PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
00
T ALK
LAR
CNDUCTVY
TURR
COLOR
non
ROD
FPOM
* FROM
TEMP
CACOl
PH
AT 25C
JKSN
5 OAY
? DAY
TO
XT RANK
CENT
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MICkOMHO
JU
PT-CO-U
MG/L
MG/L
70/ H/n
NUMBER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
?
MAXIMUM
6ft.
27.0
8.3
??.
7.1
8?.
80.
30.
?.«
1.4
MINIMUM
66.
21.0
3.7
13.
6.9
50.
15.
10.
1.0
0.1
MEAN
66.
23.8
ft.2
16.
7.0
60.
36.
15.
?.o
0.7
LOG MPAN
66.
23.a
ft.O
16.
7.0
60.
31.
13.
1.8
0 .A
70/ 9/18
00650
00653
00ft25
onftio
00630
00940
00680
00500
00515
00^30
1ATE PARAMFTFP
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
NO2S.N0 3
CHLORIDE
T ORG C
RESIDUE
RFSIOUF
RFSIDUF
FROM
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
0ISS-10*
TOT NFLT
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
70/ «/ll
Nl IMHER
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.69
0.38
1.860
1.500
0.3
ft.
8.0
167.
117.
61.
MINIMUM
0.23
0.13
0.260
0.010
0.4
3.
3.0
47.
16.
31.
MEAN
0.36
0.19
0.669
0.460
0.5
4.
4.9
97.
*>0.
47.
LOG MEAN
0.34
0.17
0.571
0.290
0.5
4.
4.6
91 .
43.
46.
70/ 9/1#
01 OAS
0104ft
01055
01056
31501
31616
OATF PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESF
MANGNESF
COLTFORM
FEC COLI
FROM
TOTAL
FE«DISS
MN
MN.OISS
IMEOFNO0
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ 8/11
NUMRER
10
10
10
10
8
9
"AXIMUM
7100.
200.
370.0
60.0
140000.
23000.
MINIMUM
1100.
60.
70.0
10.0
5300.
850.
MEAN
?700.
138.
1*1.0
38.0
42650.
6439.
LOG MEAN
12fl.
161.6
32.7
?4438.
3482.
70/ 9/l«
-------
WEST POINT STl/PY 121915 CH-13
SOOTHFAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER WEHADKEE C* HWY 238 SE LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 ?111204
»«»««»«»«»««»««»«««««*«»«««»«««««»««««»
9ATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT HANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
DO
Mfi/L
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00403
LAR
PH
SU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00070
TU»R
JKSN
JU
7051*5
COLOR
PT-CO-U
00310
ROD
5 OAY
Mfi/L
00304
ROD
2 OAY
MG/L
70/ ft/11
number
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3
2
MAXIMUM
25.0
8.3
36.
7.3
71.
57.
40.
O.ft
] .4
MINIMUM
22.0
7.4
18.
ft.8
4ft.
18.
10.
0.4
0.2
MEAN
23.4
7.B
23.
7.1
5*.
29.
24.
0.5
0.8
LOG MEAN
?3.4
7.8
23.
7.1
57.
27.
22.
0.5
0.5
70/ 9/1H
•••••••»«««•»««««•««»««»«««»« »»»«»«»»«« ««»««««« «»«»»»»««««»««»»»«»««»««««»»«»«««»<»<»
00550
00553
00625
ooftio
00*30
00940
00680
00500
00515
00530
OATF PARAMETER
T P04
S0LP04-T
TOT KJEL
AMMONIA
N024N03
CHLORIOE
T ORG C
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
FROM
P04
P04
N
NH3-N
N
CL
C
TOTAL
DISS-105
tot nelt
TO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
C MG/L
mg/L
70/ 8/11
NllMRER
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAXIMUM
0.04
0.20
1.040
0.540
0.2
3.
ft. 0
9ft.
44.
ft5.
MINIMUM
0.01
0.00
0. 120
0.040
0. 1
2.
3.0
5ft.
ft.
35.
MEAN
0.02
0.03
0. 289
0.210
0.2
2.
3.9
71.
?0.
52.
log mean
0.02
0.01
0.225
0.151
0.2
2.
3.8
71.
17.
51.
70/ 9/18
»••••»•«»«»»«•«»*»•«««»»*««»««*«»»»««««
01045
01046
01055
0105ft
31501
31ftl6
OATF PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
COLIFORM
EEC COLI
FRO**
TOTAL
EE.DISS
MN
MN«DISS
IMEDENOO
MF-C44.5
TO
UG/L
>J6/L
UG/L
UG/L
MF/100ML
MF/100ML
70/ H/ll
NUMHER
10
9
10
9
8
8
maximum
5300.
550.
420.0
300.0
5000.
920.
MINIMUM
1900.
100.
270.0
50.0
1500.
85.
MEAN
2730.
34ft.
324.0
178.9
3313.
253.
LOG MEAN
2579.
314.
320.4
157.0
3074.
180.
70/ 9/l«
»•*»##<~*»«#«#«##¦»** «innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnt# «#«##»««#««##«««##«»«•»»«
-------
APPENDIX F
Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data
Chattahoochee River Basin
February 1971
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121910*»A CH-01A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER 121910 A
PERIOO OF RECORD CHATTA R WEST POINT ABOVE US29
SCHNEIDER GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
OATE PARAMETER
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
7
2
3
8
8
MAXIMUM
33.0
15.0
210.
67.
10.1
3.0
1.9
7.2
17.
minimum
33.0
10.0
18.
35.
7.5
1.3
1.3
6.4
12.
MEAN
33.0
12.3
90.
53.
8.7
2.1
1.6
6.8
15.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.2
57.
52.
8.6
2.0
1.6
6.8
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIOUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
480.
441.
77.
0.540
1.920
0.57
0.70
0.11
11.0
8.
MINIMUM
72.
15.
39.
0.120
0.520
0.33
0.17
0.05
1.0
4.
MEAN
211.
155.
56.
0.299
0.819
0.43
0.36
0.08
5.3
6.
LOG MEAN
159.
69.
55.
0.275
0.740
0.42
0.32
0.07
3.6
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
OATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.D1SS
MN
MN»DISS
MFIMENOO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
53000.
300.
600.0
100.0
350000.
11000.
50.
MINIMUM
1300.
150.
70.0
20.0
5400.
150.
10.
MEAN
12550.
235.
271.3
61.3
113525.
4110.
26.
L06 MEAN
5108.
229.
191.1
54.4
45911.
2073.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
121910-8
CH-01B
CHATTA R WEST POINT ABOVE US29
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
00
BOO
BOO
BOO
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
M1CROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
a
8
8
8
8
3
4
8
8
MAXIMUM
66.0
15.0
180.
69.
10.S
3.3
2.0
7.2
16.
MINIMUM
66.0
10.0
20.
34.
7.3
2.0
1.4
6.6
12.
MEAN
66.0
12.1
84.
51.
9.1
2.5
1.8
6.8
14.
LOG MEAN
66.0
12.0
55.
49.
9.0
2.5
1.8
6.8
14.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
c mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
427.
363.
64.
0.500
0.940
0.53
0.63
0.10
12.0
8.
MINIMUM
61.
13.
33.
0.100
0.610
0.27
0.15
0.04
1.0
5.
MEAN
131.
132.
54.
0.271
0.754
0.39
0.30
0.07
5.0
6.
LOG MEAN
142.
66.
53.
0.246
0.747
0.38
0.27
0.07
3.6
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.DISS
MN
MN»DISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
6
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
27000.
280.
500.0
170.0
320000.
13000.
45.
MINIMUM
1300.
130.
80.0
40.0
4600.
480.
10.
MEAN
* 8725.
239.
263.8
77.5
94100.
4160.
26.
LOG MEAN
4519.
237.
203.7
70.3
37548.
2044.
23.
71/ 2/25
»******«
-------
WEST Pdfflf STUOf
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PER100 OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
cfl-02A
CHATTAHOOCHEE R AT HARDLEY CR MO
GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
« FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
Tl/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
33.0
13.0
23.
60.
11.2
2.7
7.2
18.
MINIMUM
33.0
11.0
15.
58.
9.1
1.6
6.7
16.
MEAN
33.0
12.0
20.
59.
10.3
2.2
6.9
17.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.0
19.
59.
10.3
2.2
6.9
16.
71/ 2/20
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
maximum
74.
22.
62.
0.230
0.530
0.54
0.24
0.10
3.0
5.
MINIMUM
65.
9.
49.
0.140
0.390
0.48
0.19
o.oft
1.0
4.
MEAN
70.
15.
56.
0.202
0.460
0.52
0.21
0.09
2.0
5.
LOG MEAN
70.
14.
56.
0.199
0.456
0.52
0.21
0.09
1.9
4.
71/ 2/20
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEtDISS
MN
MNtDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
maximum
1500.
270.
80.0
50.0
35000.
6700.
20.
MINIMUM
1400.
220.
70.0
30.0
4200.
230.
15.
MEAN
1450.
248.
77.5
42.5
17050.
2115.
16.
LOG MEAN
1449.
247.
77.4
41.6
13255.
963.
16.
71/ 2/20
-------
KEST POINT STUOY
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
121911-8
CH-02B
CHATTAHOOCHEE R AT HARDLEY CR MO
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
»••••••******••*«
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
66.0
13.0
24.
59.
11.1
2.6
7.1
17.
MINIMUM
66.0
11.0
12.
54.
9.2
1.6
6.7
16.
MEAN
66.0
12.0
19.
57.
10.3
2.1
6.9
17.
LOG MEAN
66.0
12.0
18.
57.
10.3
2.0
6.9
16.
71/ 2/20
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
ammonia
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
chloride
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
maximum
73.
15.
62.
0.320
0.440
0.53
0.22
0.13
3.0
5.
MINIMUM
64.
11.
51.
0.120
0.320
0.47
0.16
0.07
1.0
4.
MEAN
70.
13,
57.
0.222
0.402
0.51
0.19
0.10
l.a
5.
LOG MEAN
70.
13.
57.
0.210
0.399
0.51
0.19
0.10
1.6
4.
71/ 2/20
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEfOISS
MN
MN«DISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
number
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
1500.
300.
90.0
60.0
30000.
970.
20.
MINIMUM
1500.
230.
70.0
30.0
3600.
240.
10.
MEAN
1500.
275.
80.0
47.5
14900.
623.
15.
L06 MEAN
1500.
274.
79.7
46.1
11465.
555.
15.
71/ 2/20
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121913-A CH-03A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD CHATTAHOOCHEE R AT MAPLE CR. MO.
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
33.0
13.0
23.
60.
10.6
2.3
7.0
18.
MINIMUM
33.0
11.0
14.
56.
9.0
1.7
6.7
15.
MEAN
33.0
12.0
19.
58.
9.9
2.0
6.9
17.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.0
19.
57.
9.9
2.0
6.9
17.
71/ 2/20
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
74.
17.
63.
0.240
0.500
0.57
0.24
0.13
3.0
5.
MINIMUM
66.
11.
50.
0.130
0.380
0.49
0.19
0.07
1.0
4.
MEAN
70.
14.
56.
0.210
0.445
0.53
0.21
0.10
1.8
5.
LOG MEAN
70.
13.
56.
0.204
0.443
0.53
0.21
0.10
1.6
4.
71/ 2/20
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.DISS
MN
MN»DISS
MFIMENOO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
number
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
1700.
300.
80.0
70.0
32000.
1100.
20.
MINIMUM
1600.
200.
70.0
50.0
5600.
280.
15.
MEAN
1625.
258.
75.0
60.0
16900.
703.
16.
LOG MEAN
1624.
255.
74.8
59.2
14107.
626.
16.
71/ 2/20
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
121913-B
CH-03B
CHATTAHOOCHEE R AT MAPLE CR. MO.
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
OATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TUR8
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOO
BOO
LAB
T ALK
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
micromho
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
66.0
13.0
23.
57.
10.6
2.3
7.1
17.
MINIMUM
66.0
11.0
18.
52.
9.3
1.9
6.8.
13.
MEAN
66.0
12.0
20.
56.
10.2
2.0
6.9
16.
LOG MEAN
66.0
12.0
20.
55.
10.2
2.0
6.9
16.
71/ 2/20
*••**••««•«**«*»«***««**»*»*»»«««*»«»««««**«**«««*«*•««*«*«»*«*»««»«»««*««*««»«««*««««»#««»«««««««««*»»«««•««••«»•«««»«»
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
MAXIMUM
69.
17.
57.
0.230
0.440
0.56
0.23
0.11
2.0
5.
MINIMUM
61.
10.
47.
0.120
0.300
0.48
0.15
0.07
1.0
4.
mean
66.
13.
53.
0.190
0.365
0.52
0.20
0.09
1.5
5.
LOG MEAN
66.
13.
53.
0.185
0.362
0.52
0.20
0.09
1.4
4.
71/ 2/20
*•••*»•*••••••»•*»»*»**«»»*»•»»«*»»»»*•*»»»«•**«*»»*»•***»•»••*»**»»***»*»»»»•*»»***»»»»*»*»»»»*»»»*»•»»»»*»*•»»«•»»••««
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO.
FROM
TOTAL
FEtDISS
MN
MNtDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC PERCENT
NUMBER
4
4
4
4
5
5
4
MAXIMUM
1700.
300.
90.0
60.0
41000.
740.
20.
MINIMUM
1300.
230.
70.0
20.0
3600*
240.
10.
mean'
1475.
255.
80.0
40.0
16920.
570.
15.
LOG MEAN
1468.
254.
79.7
36.6
12826.
533.
15.
71/ 2/20
-------
WEHADKEE CR HWY 244 W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1U3S050 2111204
DATE PARAMETER
00002
00010
00070
0Q095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOO
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
« FROM
tew
JKSN
AT 2SC
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
7
3
3
8
8
MAXIMUM
15.0
80.
42.
10.8
0.9
1.6
7.2
17.
MINIMUM
8.0
13.
26.
9.0
0.3
0.4
6.6
9.
MEAN
11.9
37.
33.
10.1
0.6
r.i
6.9
13.
LOG MEAN
11.7
29.
33.
10.1
0.6
0.9
6.9
13.
71/ 2/25
DAfE parameter
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
from
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
mg/l
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
mg/l
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
136.
81.
55.
0.340
0.700
0.20
0.10
0.05
8.0
7.
MINIMUM
43#
2.
31.
0.040
0.110
0.11
0.02
0.01
1.0
3.
MEAN
76.
30.
46.
0.161
0.440
0.16
0.05
0.02
3.0
4.
LOG MEAN
70.
17.
46.
0.134
0.378
0.16
0.04
0.02
2.2
4.
71/ 2/25
-
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
date parameter
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEtDISS
MN
MN»DISS
mfimenoo
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
maximum
6100.
400.
300.0
170.0
4800.
2600.
50.
MINIMUM
1000.
180.
150.0
80.0
170.
40.
10.
MEAN
2688.
264.
221.3
131.3
1726.
764.
26.
LOG MEAN
2166.
257.
215.0
126.3
826.
239.
23.
71/ 2/25
WEST *<»*«, .STUOi^
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOO OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121920-A CH-05A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD CHATTAHOOCHEE R GA 238 W OF LAGR
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
/
00002 00010 00070 00095 00300 00304
HSAMPLOC HATER TURB CNDUCTVY DO BOD
* FROM TEMP JKSN AT 25C 2 DAY
RT BANK CENT JU MICROMHO MG/L MG/L
00305
BOD
3 DAY
M6/L
00310
BOD
5 DAY
MG/L
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
8
33.0
33.0
33.0
33.0
8
15.0
10.0
12.2
12.1
8
180.
21.
84.
59.
8
90.
35.
59.
57.
8
10.4
6.6
8.8
8.7
3
3.5
1.7
2.6
2.5
4
2.5
1.8
2.1
2.1
8
7.1
6.4
6.7
6.7
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
8
18.
13.
16.
16.
71/ 2/25
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
407.
345.
71.
0.730
1.530
1.07
0.68
0.12
10.0
10.
MINIMUM
82.
18.
43.
0.020
0.470
0.29
0.19
0.05
1.0
5.
MEAN
199.
137.
63.
0.416
0.985
0.52
0.34
0.08
4.9
8.
LOG MEAN
163.
70.
62.
0.279
0.897
0.48
0.31
0.08
3.6
7.
71/ 2/25
~##»~#~•»#»•»*~•»»»#****»»#*»**«****~*•»»»»»*»*##»»»»******#*»»#*»»#**»****«**»»**##*»*****»********»**»*«»»*¦»*#*»*»~#»»»*
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
date parameter
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
from
TOTAL
FEtOISS
MN
MNtDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
number
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
26000.
310.
500,0
150*0
280000.
9300.
45.
MINIMUM
1200.
170.
100.0
30.0
8400.
650.
10.
MEAN
8788.
224.
301.3
83.8
100050.
3000.
26.
LOG MEAN
4812.
220.
253.7
75.9
59010.
1931.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
tfCST PbINT STUDY 121920-B CH-05B
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
*ERJ°? REC0R0 CHATTAHOOCHEE R GA. 238 W OF LAGR
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
DATE PARAMETER
00002
00010
00070
0009S
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
7
8
3
4
8
8
MAXIMUM
66.0
15.0
180.
77.
10.3
3.1
2.6
7.1
18.
MINIMUM
66.0
10.0
21.
35.
6.4
1.8
2.0
6.4
12.
MEAN
66*0
12.2
84.
54.
8.8
2.5
2.3
6.7
15.
LOG MEAN
66.0
12.1
57.
52.
8.7
2.4
2.3
6.7
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
451.
398.
68.
0.540
1.200
0.97
0.65
0.12
9.0
8.
MINIMUM
74.
12.
42.
0.020
0.500
0.30
0.20
0.05
1.0
5.
MEAN
210.
152.
57.
0.341
0.841
0.51
0.37
0.08
4.4
6.
LOG MEAN
163.
67.
57.
0.248
0.816
0.48
0.34
0.08
3.2
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE»DISS
MN
MNfDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
29000.
350.
530.0
140.0
420000.
11000.
40.
MINIMUM
1300.
160.
90.0
30.0
7200.
520.
10.
MEAN
10063.
228.
278.B
81.3
117025.
3378.
26.
LOG MEAN
4942.
221.
210.4
73.4
56641.
2036.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121938-A CH-06A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD CHATT R 6A HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGE
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOD
bod
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
* FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
micromho
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
mg/l
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
7
3
3
8
8
MAXIMUM
33.0
15.0
200.
70.
11.0
2.7
4.1
7.4
18.
MINIMUM
33.0
10.5
20.
39.
6.1
1.2
1.9
6.5
11.
MEAN
33.0
12.8
90.
52.
8.7
1.7
2.8
6.8
16.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.7
60.
50.
8. 6
1.6
2.7
6.8
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS—105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
570.
500.
70.
0.440
0.980
0.52
0.67
0.12
10.0
7.
MINIMUM
60.
9.
40.
0.120
0.460
0.30
0.22
0.04
1.0
4.
MEAN
209.
154.
54.
0.296
0.717
0.39
0.35
0.08
4.0
6.
LOG MEAN
153.
69.
54.
0.275
0.693
0.38
0.32
0.08
2.7
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COH
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEtDISS
MN
MNrDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
17000.
280.
610.0
150.0
320000.
16000.
40.
MINIMUM
1100.
180.
60.0
20.0
12000.
1300.
10.
MEAN
6113.
224.
260.0
76.3
114250.
5263.
26.
LOG MEAN
3872.
221.
202.9
63.4
65238.
3S74.
22.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUOY 121938-8 CH-068
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOO OF RECORD CHATT R GA HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGE
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1U3S050 77777777
DATE PARAMETER
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
HSAMPLOC
HATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOO
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
« FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
7
8
8
7
3
3
8
8
MAXIMUM
66.0
15.0
200.
78.
9.5
3.6
3.7
7.2
19.
MINIMUM
66* 0
10.5
21.
40.
6.1
1.6
1.7
6.5
12.
MEAN
66.0
12.9
88*.
55.
8.4
2.6
2.5
6.8
16.
LOG MEAN
66*0
12.8
60.
54.
8.3
2.5
2.3
6.8
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
c mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
a
MAXIMUM
643.
583.
67.
0.620
1.400
0.59
0.84
0.16
9.0
8.
MINIMUM
67.
12.
41.
0.140
0.500
0.34
0.23
0.06
1.0
4.
MEAN
223.
169.
54.
0.375
0.876
0.45
0.40
0.10
4.3
6.
LOG MEAN
161.
73.
53.
0.346
0.840
0.44
0.36
0.09
2.9
6.
71/ 2/25
»»***«•*«»»*»«»»«»»»«»»«*««*««»»
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
OATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE»DISS
MN
MNtOISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
48000.
300.
760.0
230.0
480000.
12000.
50.
MINIMUM
1100.
170.
60.0
30.0
11000.
900.
10.
MEAN
11500.
224.
277.5
91.3
163875.
4750.
26.
LOG MEAN
4896.
219.
203.7
75.2
79466.
3259.
21.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121939 CH-07
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD CHATTAHOOCHEE R AT LAO WATER INT
SCHNEIDE* 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNDUCTVY
DO
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
7
7
7
7
7
5.0
13.5
190.
72.
10.9
5.0
JL0.5
19.
40.
5.9
5.0
11.9
87.
55.
9.6
5.0
11.9
56.
53.
9.4
71/ 2/25
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
»**«»««
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00304
BOD
2 DAY
MG/L
00630
N02&N03
N
MG/L
00305
BOD
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOD
5 DAY
MG/L
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
2
4
7
7
3.6
4.9
7.1
20.
2.2
2.6
6.3
12.
2.9
3.6
6.8
16.
2.8
3.5
6.8
16.
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LPO4-T
P04
MG/L
»**«»•****•«***»**
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
7
507.
67.
187.
131*
7
463.
11.
134.
53.
7
7
7
7
7
67.
0.930
1.900
0.60
0.78
33.
0.320
0.770
0.33
0.25
53.
0.623
1.304
0.47
0.42
52.
0.588
1.253
0.46
0.39
71/ 2/25
DATE
FROM
TO
71/ 2/17
PARAMETER
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
01045
IRON
TOTAL
UG/L
7
31000.
1100.
10086.
4670.
01046
IRON
FE.DISS
UG/L
01055
MAN6NESE
MN
UG/L
01056
MANGNESE
MNtDISS
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
7
7
7
7
310.
660.0
150.0
310000.
200.
100.0
30.0
15000.
234.
282.9
77.1
136143.
232.
219.6
66.7
84874.
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
7
13000.
1400.
5400.
3952.
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-U
7
45.
10.
25.
22.
71/2/25
7
0.18
0.02
0.09
0.08
»,**««
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
7
11.0
1.0
4.7
3.0
00060
STREAM
FLOW
7
7.
4.
6.
6.
00301
DO
SATUR
CUFT/SEC PERCENT
-------
WEST POINT STUOY 121940 CH-06
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOO OF RECORD YELLOW JACKET CR S2098 W OF LAGR
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1U3S050 2111204
DATE PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
00010
WATER
00070
TURB
00095
CNDUCTVY
00300
DO
00304
BOD
00305
BOD
00310
BOO
00403
LAB
00410
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
7
7
7
7
3
3
7
7
MAXIMUM
14.5
160.
47.
11.1
1.6
1.1
7.0
17.
MINIMUM
9.5
21.
32.
4.6
0.2
0.2
6.5
11.
MEAN
11.2
65.
39.
9.0
0.9
0.8
6.7
15.
LOG MEAN
11.1
48.
39.
8.7
0.7
0.6
6.7
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
c mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
287.
217.
72.
1.000
1.740
0.24
0.18
0.04
6.0
8.
MINIMUM
58.
8.
35.
0.140
0.400
0.12
0.05
0.02
1.0
3.
MEAN
114.
61.
54.
0.415
0.874
0.18
0.10
0.03
2.8
5.
LOG MEAN
100.
38.
52.
0.343
0.781
0.18
0.09
0.03
2.1
5.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
StREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEvDISS
MN
MN»DISS
MFIMENOO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
number
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
6800.
280.
940.0
80.0
50000.
17000.
65.
MINIMUM
1500.
190.
160.0
30.0
4000.
50.
10.
MEAN
2S13.
245.
338.8
66.3
16350.
3975.
31.
LOG MEAN
2195.
244.
280.8
63.3
10980.
652.
26.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121945 CH-09
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD YELLOW JACKET CR NE LAGRANGE
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
OATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
HATER
TUR8
CNOUCTVY
00
BOD
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
« FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CACC3
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
7
7
7
7
2
4
7
7
MAXIMUM
15.5
155.
42.
11.0
1.5
1.0
7.0
17.
MINIMUM
a.5
18.
27.
8.5
0.9
0.4
6.3
12.
MEAN
12.2
57.
34.
9.4
1.2
0.8
6.7
14.
LOG MEAN
12.0
41.
34.
9.4
1.2
0.7
6.7
14.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N021N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
217.
164.
57.
0.480
1.040
0.28
0.14
0.02
6.0
10.
MINIMUM
52.
6.
34.
0.060
0.190
0.12
0.04
0.01
1.0
3.
MEAN
<56.
50.
45.
0.197
0.562
0.18
0.07
0.02
2.6
5.
LOG MEAN
84.
29,
44.
0.156
0.480
0.18
0.06
0.02
2.1
4.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
OATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.DlSS
MN
MNfDISS
MFIMENOO
MFM-FC8R
TEMP
FLO*
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
number
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
11000.
280.
630.0
200.0
49000.
10000.
50.
MINIMUM
1500.
160.
160.0
70.0
200.
20.
10.
MEAN
3800.
231.
281.3
97.5
8369.
2066.
26.
LOG MEAN
3022.
227.
247.2
91.7
1884.
349.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121960-A CH-10A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD* OF RECORD CHATT R 6A HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
HATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOO
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
number
8
8
8
8
8
3
4
8
8
MAXIMUM
33.0
15.0
250.
75.
9.9
2.9
3.3
6.9
18.
MINIMUM
33.0
10.5
18.
36.
5.5
1.6
2.0
6.4
12.
MEAN
33.0
12.4
96.
53.
8.3
2.1
2.6
6.7
15.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.4
61.
52.
8.2
2.0
2.5
6.7
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
c mg/l
MG/L
MG/L
M6/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
MAXIMUM
814.
770.
65.
0.970
1.600
0.50
0.85
0.13
12.0
9.
MINIMUM
76.
15.
33.
0.260
0.670
0.33
0.22
0.04
1.0
4.
MEAN
247.
193.
54.
0.543
1.127
0.42
0.41
0.07
4.2
6.
LOG MEAN
174.
84.
53.
0.499
1.084
0.41
0.38
0.07
2.7
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE»OISS
MN
MNtOISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
64000.
360.
850.0
150.0
800000.
12000.
45.
MINIMUM
1100.
140.
90.0
30.0
25000.
1000.
10.
MEAN
10978.
224.
276.7
64.4
193125.
4338.
27.
LOG MEAN
3535.
218.
205.4
58.9
101298.
3329.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERI00 OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
121960-B
CH-10a
CHATT R GA HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
•••*»•••»••*»»»••»*«***••*••**»»**»»**«**»»*»*««*»«•«•««««*«««*«»«««*«*»««««**««»««*«««»»«»«««««««»»«•»««»«»»«••»««»«»««
OATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
* FROM
RT BANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00070
TURB
JKSN
JU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00300
DO
MG/L
00304
BOD
2 DAY
MG/L
00305
BOD
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOD
5 DAY
MG/L
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
71/ 2/17
71/ 2/25
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
3
4
8
8
MAXIMUM
66.0
15.0
250.
71.
9.8
3.3
5.2
7.0
19.
MINIMUM
66.0
10.5
19.
36.
5.9
1.5
1.0
6.4
12.
MEAN
66.0
12.4
93.
53.
8.2
2.3
2.9
6.7
15.
LOG MEAN
66.0
12.4
57.
51.
8.2
2.2
2.5
6.7
15.
»*««»«****••«*»»«•»•»»««»«*««*•**««««««««««»»««*«'»««**»««««»«««*«*«»«»*««*««««»«•««««««»*«•««*«•«•«
00500 00515 00530 00610 00625 00630 00650 00653 00680 00940
DATE PARAMETER RESIDUE RESIDUE RESIDUE AMMONIA TOT KJEL N02&N03
FROM
TO
TOTAL
MG/L
DISS-105 TOT NFLT NH3-N
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
N
MG/L
N
MG/L
T P04
P04
MG/L
S0LP04-T T ORG C CHLORIDE
P04
MG/L
C
MG/L
CL
mg/l
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
a
MAXIMUM
926.
87 4.
67.
0.770
1.860
0.49
0.98
0.16
14.0
9.
MINIMUM
73.
15.
36.
0.270
0.680
0.33
0.23
0.05
1.0
4.
MEAN
259.
206.
55.
0.504
1.044
0.41
0.42
0.10
4.1
6.
LOG MEAN
172.
76.
54.
0.475
0.997
0.40
0.38
0.09
2.7
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.DISS
MN
MN*DISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
73000.
400.
880.0
150.0
320000.
11000.
45.
MINIMUM
1200.
140.
80.0
30.0
28000.
2200.
10.
MEAN
14650.
224.
281.3
65.0
102750.
5363.
28.
LOG MEAN
5102.
213.
196.9
58.2
73572.
4467.
23.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121980 CH-11
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
-PJSSJS! REC0R0 NEW R US 27 S OF FRANKLIN
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
DATE PARAMETER
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOO
BOD
FROM
« FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 2SC
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
MICROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
3
4
MAXIMUM
14.5
150.
61.
11.2
1.0
1.0
MINIMUM
8.5
16.
27.
7.7
0.8
0.2
MEAN
11.2
58.
41.
9.1
0.9
0.6
LOG MEAN
11.1
43.
39.
9.0
0.9
0.5
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LPO4-
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
360.
306.
56.
0.400
1.050
0.24
0.30
0.21
MINIMUM
58.
6.
27.
0.100
0.350
0.06
0.16
0.05
MEAN
137.
88.
48.
0.285
0.734
0.17
0.23
0.11
LOG MEAN
109.
39.
46.
0.259
0.690
0.15
0.23
0.10
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
FROM
TOTAL
FE.DISS
MN
MN»OISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FC0R
TEMP
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
9400.
460.
450.0
70.0
23000.
13000.
50.
MINIMUM
1100.
180.
120.0
50.0
70.
37.
15.
MEAN
3950.
276.
228.8
58.8
7291.
3080.
30.
LOG MEAN
2934.
265.
203.5
58.0
2112.
606.
27.
71/ 2/25
00403
LAB
PH
SU
8
7.1
6.5
6.7
6.7
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
8
16.
10.
14.
14.
00680
T ORG C
C
MG/L
8
7.0
1.0
4.1
3.4
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
8
7.
3.
5.
5.
00060
STREAM
FLOW
00301
DO
SATUR
CUFT/SEC PERCENT
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121992-A CH-12A
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD CHATT R AT US 27 FRANKLIN
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TURB
CNOUCTVY
DO
BOO
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
M1CROMHO
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
7
7
7
7
7
2
4
7
7
MAXIMUM
33*0
14.0
210.
73.
10.9
3.1
4.4
7.0
19.
MINIMUM
33.0
11.0
19.
41.
5.9
1.3
2.1
6.5
7.
MEAN
33.0
12.5
82.
58.
9.1
2.2
3.5
6.7
16.
LOG MEAN
33.0
12.5
54.
57.
8.9
2.0
3.4
6.7
15.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
residue
AMMONIA
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
OISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
mg/l
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
902.
821.
81.
0.960
1.900
0.50
0.90
0.16
8.0
9.
MINIMUM
73.
10.
34.
0.280
0.780
0.30
0.24
0.05
0.0
5.
MEAN
257.
197.
58.
0.657
1.261
0.39
0.45
0.11
4.1
6.
LOG MEAN
175.
75.
56.
0.614
1.211
0.38
0.42
0.10
1.8
6.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FE.OISS
MN
MNtDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
8
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
maximum
49000.
360.
800.0
170.0
860000.
40000.
50.
MINIMUM
1300.
180.
80.0
40.0
22000.
1500.
15.
MEAN
10663.
234.
268.8
78.8
280000.
13113.
28.
LOG MEAN
4837.
229.
201.1
71.1
152225.
8734.
25.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERIOD OF RECORD
SCHNEIDER
121992-B
CH-12B
CHATT R AT US 27 FRANKLIN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 77777777
»***•*•*•*•»*•»•#•••**•••*•»*»•*****•**•#******««*•••******•••
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00002
HSAMPLOC
% FROM
RT BANK
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00070
TURB
JKSN
JU
00095
CNDUCTVY
AT 25C
MICROMHO
00300
DO
MG/L
00304
BOO
2 DAY
MG/L
00305
BOD
3 DAY
MG/L
00310
BOD
5 DAY
MG/L
00403
LAB
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
71/ 2/25
8
66.0
66*0
66.0
66.0
DATE
FROM
TO
PARAMETER
00500
RESIDUE
TOTAL
MG/L
8
15.0
11.0
12.8
12.7
8
200.
18.
86.
59.
8
73.
37.
54.
52.
8
11.0
6.1
8.7
8.5
3
3.0
1.2
2.0
1.9
4
4.3
3.5
3.9
3.9
8
7.0
6.5
6.7
6.7
8
19.
14.
17.
17.
»»»•»•¦&*«•»»#»•»»»¦»~»»«#»~»»»»»*»»»~»»»*•»»»# »#»»»'innnnnnt »«•»»»•»¦«•»«•»«•»¦»»»»¦»»«»«»
00515
RESIDUE
DISS-105
C MG/L
00530
RESIDUE
TOT NFLT
MG/L
00610
AMMONIA
NH3-N
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00630
N02&.N03
N
MG/L
00650
T P04
P04
MG/L
00653
S0LP04-T
P04
MG/L
00680
ORG C
C
MG/L
00940
CHLORIDE
CL
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MEAN
LOG MEAN
71/ 2/25
DATE PARAMETER
FROM
TO
8
845.
74.
257.
179.
8
717.
10.
189.
74.
01045
IRON
TOTAL
UG/L
01046
IRON
FE»DISS
UG/L
8
128.
49.
68.
65.
8
0.920
0.300
0.627
0.588
8
1.900
0.920
1.216
1.186
8
0.48
0.34
0.40
0.40
8
0.97
0.22
0.46
0.42
8
0.16
0.05
0.10
0.10
8
9.0
1.0
4.1
3.1
6
9.
5.
6.
6.
01055
MANGNESE
MN
UG/L
01056
MANGNESE
MN»DISS
UG/L
31501
TOT COLI
MFIMENDO
/100ML
31616
FEC COLI
MFM-FCBR
/100ML
70515
COLOR
PT-CO-U
00020
AIR
TEMP
CENT
00060
STREAM
FLOW
CUFT/SEC
00301
DO
SATUR
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
63000.
270.
840.0
170.0
880000.
27000.
50.
minimum
1200.
180.
70.0
40.0
32000.
1800.
15.
MEAN
12963.
229.
280.0
75.0
326500.
11375.
29.
LOG MEAN
5158.
227.
211.3
67.0
176282.
7763.
25.
71/ 2/25
-------
WEST POINT STUDY 121915 CH-13
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
PERI00 OF RECORD 4EHADKEE CR HWY 238 SE LAGRANGE
SCHNEIDER 13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00002
00010
00070
00095
00300
00304
00305
00310
00403
00410
DATE PARAMETER
HSAMPLOC
WATER
TUR8
CNDUCTVY
DO
BOD
BOD
BOD
LAB
T ALK
FROM
% FROM
TEMP
JKSN
AT 25C
2 DAY
3 DAY
5 DAY
PH
CAC03
TO
RT BANK
CENT
JU
micromho
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
SU
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
7
7
7
7
3
3
7
7
MAXIMUM
15.0
110.
55.
11.0
2.7
5.7
7.0
15.
MINIMUM
8.0
14.
26.
8.7
0.9
i.6
6.6
10.
MEAN
11.6
50.
37.
10.0
1.6
3.0
6.8
12.
LOG MEAN
11.4
38.
35.
9.9
1.4
2.5
6.8
12.
71/ 2/25
00500
00515
00530
00610
00625
00630
00650
00653
00680
00940
DATE PARAMETER
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
RESIDUE
ammonia
TOT KJEL
N02&N03
T P04
S0LP04-T
T ORG C
CHLORIDE
FROM
TOTAL
DISS-105
TOT NFLT
NH3-N
N
N
P04
P04
C
CL
TO
MG/L
C MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
71/ 2/17
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
154.
103.
68.
0.470
0.860
0.20
0.33
0.03
8.0
7.
MINIMUM
49.
2.
33.
0.050
0.140
0.10
0.02
0.01
1.0
4.
MEAN
90.
41.
48.
0.184
0.471
0.16
0.08
0.02
3.0
5.
LOG MEAN
82.
21.
47.
0.145
0.402
0.16
0.05
0.02
2.1
5.
71/ 2/25
01045
01046
01055
01056
31501
31616
70515
00020
00060
00301
DATE PARAMETER
IRON
IRON
MANGNESE
MANGNESE
TOT COLI
FEC COLI
COLOR
AIR
STREAM
DO
FROM
TOTAL
FEtDISS
MN
MNfDISS
MFIMENDO
MFM-FCBR
TEMP
FLOW
SATUR
TO
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
/100ML
/100ML
PT-CO-U
CENT
CUFT/SEC
PERCENT
71/ 2/17
71/ 2/25
NUMBER
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
MAXIMUM
6600.
290.
2600.0
250.0
5600.
3800.
50.
MINIMUM
1100.
200.
150.0
80.0
80.
14.
10.
MEAN
3225.
241.
553.8
127.5
1798.
1069.
25.
LOG MEAN
2582.
239.
322.4
116.0
714.
262.
22.
-------
appendix g
Statistical Summary of Water Quality Data
for a Diurnal Study at Stations 5, 6, 10 and 12
Chattahoochee River Basin
September 1970
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
00002
DATE TIME DEPTH HSAMPLOC
FROM OF % FROM
TO DAY FEET RT BANK
70/09/17 0700 33
70/09/17 0800 33
70/09/17 0900 33
70/09/17 1005 33
70/09/17 1100 33
70/09/17 1200 33
70/09/17 1300 33
70/09/17 1400 33
70/09/17 1500 33
70/09/17 1600 33
70/09/17 1710 33
70/09/17 1800 33
70/09/17 1900 33
00/00/00
STATION NUMBER 13
MAXIMUM 33
MINIMUM 33
MEAN 33
99/99/99
water0 t°alk° 00403
S? LtZ
LOG M®or su
26.5 L°® LOG
?6.0 5° 6.8
26.0 6.8
26.0 fa 6.7
26.0 >q 6.8
26.0 « 6.8
26.0 ,, 6.9
26.0 ,7 6.9
26.0 7.0
25.0 ;? 6.9
25.5 " 7.0
25.0 J J 7.0
25.0 * 6.9
15 7.0
13.0 >>
26.5 if 13.0
25.0 f* 7.0
25.8 :? 6.7
" 6.9
121920
CH-05
CHATTAHOOCHEE R GA 238 W OF LAGR
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00300
DO
MG/L
LOG
4.7 26.5
4.8 26.0
A.8 26.0
4.9 26.0
5.0 26.0
5.1 26.0
5.5 26.0
5.8 26.0
5.8 26.0
6.1 25.0
6.4 25.5
5.7 25.0
6.4 25.0
13.0 13.0
6.4 26.5
4.7 25.0
5.4 25.8
00010 00410 00403 00300
WATER T ALK LAR DO
TEMP CAC03 PH
CENT MG/L SU MG/L
20
6.8
4.7
20
6.8
4.8
21
6.7
4.8
19
6.8
4.9
19
6.8
5.0
18
6.9
5.1
17
6.9
5.5
16
7.0
5.8
15
6.q
5.8
14
7.0
6.1
15
7.0
6.4
16
6.9
5.7
15
7.0
6.4
13
13.0
13.0
21
7.0
6.4
14
6.7
4.7
17
6.9
5.5
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE• RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE
TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
WATER
T ALK
LAR
FROM
OF
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
0705
66
26.5
19
6.8
70/09/17
oao5
66
26.0
19
6.8
70/09/17
0905
66
26.0
19
6.7
70/09/17
1010
66
26.0
16
6.8
70/09/17
1105
66
26.0
19
6.8
70/09/17
1205
66
26.0
18
6.7
70/09/17
1305
66
26.0
16
6.8
70/09/17
1405
66
26.0
15
6.8
70/09/17
1505
66
26.0
14
6.7
70/09/17
1605
66
25.0
16
6.9
70/09/17
1705
66
25.5
15
6.9
70/09/17
1805
66
24.5
15
6.7
70/09/17
1905
66
24.5
16
6.8
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
13
13.0
MAXIMUM
66
26.5
19
6.9
MINIMUM
66
24.5
14
6.7
MEAN
66
25.7
17
6.8
<99/99/99
121920
CHATTAHOOCHEE R
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050
CH-05
GA 238 W OF LAGR
2111204
00300
00010
00410
00403
00300
DO
WATER
T ALK
LAB
DO
TEMP
CAC03
PH
MG/L
CENT
MG/L
SU
MG/L
LOG
4.9
26.5
19
6.8
4.9
5.0
26.0
19
6.8
5.0
4.6
26.0
19
6.7
4.6
5.1
26.0
16
6.8
5.1
5.1
26.0
19
6.8
5. 1
5.2
26.0
18
6.7
5.2
5.7
26.0
16
6.8
5.7
5.7
26.0
15
6.8
5.7
6.4
26.0
14
6.7
6.4
6.1
25.0
16
6.9
6.1
6.6
25.5
15
6.9 .
6.6
6.8
24.5
15
6.7
6.8
6.6
24.5
16
6.8
6.6
13.0
13.0
13
13.0
13.0
6.8
26.5
19
6.9
6.8
4.6
24.5
14
6.7
4.6
5.6
25.7
17
6.8
5.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE
TIME DEPTH
H5AMPL0C
WATER
T ALK
LAB
FROM
OF
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
072S
33
25.0
20
6.8
70/09/17
0820
33
25.0
19
6.9
70/09/17
0920
33
24.5
16
6.9
70/09/17
1020
33
24.5
19
6.9
70/09/17
1120
33
24.5
18
6.9
70/09/17
1220
33
24.5
16
6.9
70/09/17
1320
33
24.0
16
7.0
70/09/17
1420
33
26.0
16
6.9
70/09/17
1520
33
25.0
16
7.0
70/09/17
1615
33
25.0
16
7.0
70/09/17
1730
33
24.0
15
7.0
70/09/17
1825
33
24.0
16
7.0
70/09/17
1915
33
24.0
18
7.0
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
13
13.0
MAXIMUM
33
26.0
20
7.0
MINIMUM
33
24.0
15
6.8
MEAN
33
24.6
17
6.9
99/99/99
121938
CH-06
CHATT R GA HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE GDPH 16
1113S050 2111204
00300 00010 00410 00403 00300
DO WATER T ALK LAB DO
TEMP CAC03 PH
mg/l cent mg/l su mg/l
LOG
5.1
25.0
20
6.8
5.1
5.0
25.0
19
6.9
5.0
4.8
24.5
16
6.9
4.8
5.8
24.5
19
6.9
5.8
6.1
24.5
18
6.9
6.1
6.0
24.5
16
6.9
6.0
6.5
24.0
16
7.0
6.5
6.6
26.0
16
6.9
6.6
6.6
25.0
16
7.0
6.6
6.7
25.0
16
7.0
6.7
6.6
24.0
15
7.0
6.6
6.6
24.0
16
7.0
6.6
6.4
24.0
18
7.0
6.4
13.0
13.0
13
13.0
13.0
6.7
26.0
20
7.0
6.7
4.8
24.0
15
6.8
4.8
6.0
24.6
17
6.9
6.1
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE
TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
WATER
T ALK
LAB
FROM
OF
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
0730
66
25.0
18
6.8
70/09/17
0825
66
25.0
17
6.9
70/09/17
0925
66
24.5
16
6.8
70/09/17
1025
66
24.5
15
6.8
70/09/17
1125
66
24.5
17
6.8
70/09/17
1225
66
24.5
15
6.9
70/09/17
1325
66
24.0
15
6.9
70/09/17
1425
66
24.5
14
7.0
70/09/17
1525
66
24.0
15
7.0
70/09/17
1620
66
24.0
15
7.0
7«/09/17
1725
66
24.0
15
7.0
70/09/17
1820
66
24.0
17
6.9
70/09/17
1920
66
24.0
19
7.0
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
13
13.0
MAXIMUM
66
25.0
19
7.0
MINIMUM
66
24.0
14
6.8
MEAN
66
24.3
16
6.9
99/99/99
121938
CH-06
CHATT R GA HWY 109 W OF LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE GDPH 16
1113S050 2111204
00300
00010
00410
00403
00300
DO
WATER
T ALK
LAB
DO
TEMP
CAC03
PH
MG/L
CENT
MG/L
SU
mg/l
LOG
4.8
25.0
18
6. 8
4.8
5.0
25.0
17
6.9
5.0
5.3
24.5
16
6.8
5.3
5.8
?4.5
15
6. ft
5.8
5.9
24.5
17
6.8
5.9
5.9
24.5
15
6.9
5.9
6.5
24.0
15
6.9
6.5
6.6
24.5
14
7.0
6.6
6.4
24.0
15
7.0
6.4
6.4
24.0
15
7.0
6.4
6.5
24.0
15
7.0
6.5
6.3
24.0
17
6.9
6.3
6.1
24.0
19
7.0
6.1
13.0
13.0
13
13.0
13.0
6.6
25.0
19
7.0
6.6
4.8
24.0
14
6.A
4.8
5.9
24.3
16
6.9
6.0
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
water
T ALK
LAR
FROM OF
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO OAV FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17 0700
33
23.5
15
6.8
70/09/17 0600
33
23.5
14
6.8
70/09/17 0900
33
23.5
15
6.8
70/09/17 1000
33
23.5
15
6.8
70/09/17 1100
33
23.5
15
6.8
70/09/17 1200
33
23.5
14
6.8
70/09/17 1300
33
24.0
14
6.8
70/09/17 1400
33
24.0
15
6.9
70/09/17 1500
33
23.5
15
6.9
70/09/17 1600
33
23.5
16
6.8
70/09/17 1700
33
23.5
16
6.9
70/09/17 1800
33
23.5
20
6.8
70/09/17 1900
33
23.5
14
6.8
00/00/00
STATION NUMBER
13
13.0
13
13.0
MAXIMUM
33
24.0
20
6.9
MINIMUM
33
23.5
14
6.8
MEAN
33
23.6
15
6.8
99/99/99
121960 CH-10
CHATT R 6A HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
>0 300
00010
00410
00403
00300
00
WATER
T ALK
LAB
DO
TEMP
CAC03
PH
IG/L
CENT
MG/L
SU
MG/L
LOG
5.8
23.5
15
6.ft
5.8
5.8
23.5
14
6.«
5.8
6.3
23.5
15
6.a
6.3
6.3
23.5
15
6.8
6.3
6.1
23.5
15
6.8
6.1
6.3
23.5
14
6.8
6.1
6.3
24.0
14
6.8
6.3
6.1
24.0
15
6.9
6.1
6.3
23.5
15
6.9
6.3
6.4
23.5
16
6.8
6.4
6.0
23.5
16
6.9
6.0
6.3
23.5
20
6.8
6.3
6.4
23.5
14
6.8
6.4
13.0
13.0
13
13.0
13.0
6.4
24.0
20
6.9
6.4
5.8
23.5
14
6.8
5.8
6.2
23.6
15
6.8
6.2
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE
TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
WATER
T ALK
LAB
FROM
OF
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
0705
66
23.5
14
6.8
70/09/17
0005
66
23.5
14
6.8
70/09/17
0905
66
23.5
14
6.7
70/09/17
1005
66
23.5
14
6.7
70/09/17
1105
66
23.5
14
6.7
70/09/17
1205
66
23.5
13
6.8
70/09/17
1305
66
24.0
14
6.9
70/09/17
1405
66
24.0
15
7.0
70/09/17
1505
66
23.5
16
6.9
70/09/17
1605
66
23.5
14
6.7
70/09/17
1705
66
23.5
16
6.9
70/09/17
1805
66
23.5
16
6.7
70/09/17
1905
66
23.5
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
12
12.0
MAXIMUM
66
24.0
16
7.0
MINIMUM
66
23.5
13
6.7
MEAN
66
23.6
14
6.8
99/99/W
121960
CH-10
CHATT R GA HWY 219 N W LAGRANGE
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1113S050 2111204
00300
00010
00410
00403
DO
WATER
T ALK
LAR
TEMP
CAC03
PH
MG/L
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
6.1
23.5
14
6.ft
6.1
23.5
14
6.«
6.3
23.5
14
6.7
6.1
23.5
14
6.7
6.3
23.5
14
6.7
6.3
23.5
13
6.ft
6.3
24.0
14
6.9
6.3
24.0
15
7.0
6.3
23.5
16
6.9
6.4
23.5
14
6.7
6.1
23.5
16
6.9
6.0
23.5
16
6.7
5.9
23.5
13.0
13.0
12
12.0
6.4
24.0
16
7.0
5.9
23.5
13
6.7
6.2
23.6
15
6.ft
00300
00
MG/l
6.1
6.1
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.4
6.1
6.0
5.9
13.0
6.4
5.9
6.?
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE. RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
OATE -
TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
WATER
T ALK
LAR
FROM
OF
* FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
0700
33
21.0
15
6.7
70/09/17
0800
33
21.0
15
6.8
70/09/17
0900
33
21.0
14
6.9
70/09/17
1000
33
21.5
15
6.9
70/09/17
1100
33
21.5
15
6.9
70/09/17
1200
33
21.5
17
6.9
70/09/17
1300
33
22.0
15
6.8
70/09/17
1400
33
22.0
16
6.9
70/09/17
1500
33
22.5
18
7.0
70/09/17
1600
33
22.5
16
6.9
70/09/17
1700
33
23.0
18
6.9
70/09/17
1800
33
22.5
15
7.0
70/09/17
1900
33
22.5
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
12
12.0
MAXIMUM
33
23.0
18
7.0
MINIMUM
33
21.0
14
6.7
MEAN
33
21.9
16
6.9
99/99/99
121992
CH-12
CWATT R AT US 27 FRNKLN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE C-l GDPH 15
1113S050 6111204
00300
00010
00410
00403
DO
WATER
T ALK
LAB
TEMP
CAC03
PH
MG/L
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
6.5
21.0
15
6.7
5.8
21.0
15
6 . ft
5.7
21.0
14
6.9
5.7
21.5
15
6.9
5.8
21.5
15
6.9
5.7
21.5
17
6.9
5.7
22.0
15
6.«
5.7
22.0
16
6.9
5.6
22.5
18
7.0
5.6
22.5
16
6.9
5.5
23.0
18
6.9
5.3
22.5
15
7.0
22.5
12.0
13.0
12
12.0
6.5
23.0
18
7.0
5.3
21.0
14
6.7
5.7
21.9
16
6.9
00300
DO
MG/L
6.5
5.8
5.7
5.7
5. A
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.3
12.0
6.5
5.3
5.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 71/04/22
WEST POINT STUDY
SOUTHEAST REGION
CHATTAHOOCHEE* RIVER
00002
00010
00410
00403
DATE
TIME DEPTH
HSAMPLOC
WATER
T ALK
LAB
FROM
OF
% FROM
TEMP
CAC03
PH
TO
DAY FEET
RT BANK
CENT
MG/L
SU
LOG
LOG
LOG
70/09/17
0705
66
21.0
14
6.7
70/09/17
0805
66
21.0
16
6.9
70/09/17
0905
66
21.0
16
6.9
70/09/17
1005
66
21.5
14
6.9
70/09/17
1105
66
21.5
14
6.7
70/09/17
1205
66
21.5
14
6.9
70/09/17
1305
66
22.0
14
6.7
70/09/17
1405
66
22.0
17
7.0
70/09/17
1505
66
22.5
17
7.0
70/09/17
1605
66
22.5
17
7.0
70/09/17
1705
66
23.0
16
6.8
70/09/17
1605
66
22.5
17
6.9
70/09/17
1905
66
22.5
00/00/00
STATION
NUMBER
13
13.0
12
12.0
MAXIMUM
66
23.0
17
7.0
MINIMUM
66
21.0
14
6.7
MEAN
66
21.9
15
6.9
99/99/99
121992
CH-12
CHATT R AT US 27 FRNKLN
13 GEORGIA
SOUTHEAST
CHATTAHOOCHEE C-l GDPH 15
1113S050 6111204
00300
00
MG/L
LOG
5.9
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.7
5.9
5.6
5.5
5.7
5.7
5.5
12.0
5.9
5.5
5.7
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.5
21.5
21.5
22.0
22.0
22.5
22.5
23.0
22.5
22.5
13.0
23.0
21.0
21.9
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
14
16
16
14
14
14
14
17
17
17
16
17
12
17
14
16
00403
LAR
PH
SU
6.7
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.7
6.9
6.7
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.8
6.9
12.0
7.0
6.7
6.9
00300
00
MG/L
5.9
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.6
5.7
5.9
5.6
5.5
5.7
5.7
5.5
12.0
5.9
5.5
5.7
-------
H-l
APPENDIX H
Phytoplankton Data for
West Point Preimpoundment Surveys
September 1970 and February 1971
-------
Total
Algae
264
297
264
495
495
462
462
363
132
231
66
264
33
WEST POINT PHYTOPLANKTON
(September 14, 1970)
Algae (number per milliliter)
Blue
Green
Green
Flagellates
Inert
Diatoms
Filamen-
Filamen-
(pigmented)
Diatoms
Shells
Coccoid
tous
Coccoid
tous
Green
Other
Centric
Pennate
Centric
Pennate
0
1
0
0
0
0
33
198
66
66
132
0
0
0
0
0
66
99
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99
165
66
132
0
0
0
0
0
0
99
396
33
132
0
33
132
33
66
0
66
165
0
33
0
33
33
0
0
0
132
264
33
99
0
0
165
0
0
0
99
198
33
132
0
0
66
0
0
0
66
231
33
132
0
0
0
0
0
0
66
66
0
33
0
33
0
33
0
0
0
165
0
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
66
0
0
66
0
0
33
0
0
0
165
66
33
66
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
66
66
W
-------
Sta
Ho.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WEST POINT PHYTOPLANKTON
(September 18, 1970)
Total
Algae
Blue
Coccoid
Green
Filamen-
tous
Green
Coccoid
Filamen-
tous
Flagellates
(pigmented)
Diatoms
Inert Diatoms
Shells
Green
Other
Centric
Pennate
Centric
Pennate
297
66
0
0
0
0
0
66
165
66
0
264
0
0
33
0
0
0
99
132
0
165
132
0
0
0
0
0
0
99
33
33
66
396
0
0
33
0
0
0
66
297
33
99
429
0
0
99
0
0
0
66
264
33
99
429
0
0
99
0
0
0
99
231
33
132
231
0
0
66
0
0
0
33
132
0
165
231
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
198
0
132
NO SAMPLE
396
0
0
165
0
0
0
99
132
33
66
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
0
99
66
0
33
0
0
0
0
33
33
33
198
99
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
66
33
66
pa
i
lo
-------
Total
Algae
222
361
261
160
140
140
281
120
80
583
140
483
140
WEST POINT PLANKTON
(February 14, 1970)
Algae (number per milliliter)
Blue Green Green Flagellates Inert Diatom
Filamen- Filamen- (pigmented) Diatoms Shells
Coccoid tous Coccoid tous Green Other Centric Pennate Centric Pennate
0
0
101
0
20
0
0
101
0
20
0
0
60
40
40
0
20
201
0
60
0
0
80
20
40
0
20
101
0
20
20
0
40
20
20
0
20
40
0
0
0
0
60
20
40
0
0
20
0
40
0
0
60
20
0
0
0
60
0
20
0
0
80
20
40
0
0
141
0
0
0
0
0
40
40
0
0
40
0
20
0
0
20
20
20
0
0
20
0
20
0
0
161
20
80
0
20
302
0
40
0
0
80
20
20
0
0
20
0
40
0
0
181
20
60
0
101
121
20
40
0
0
80
0
20
0
20
20
0
20
PS
i
-------
1-1
APPENDIX I
Seasonal Distribution of Invertebrates Collected
from Artificial Substrates in the Chattahoochee River
and Major Tributaries Within the West Point Lake
(Preimpoundraent Study)
-------
APPENDIX I
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
TURBELLARIA
Planariidae *S 1 1 1
*W 1 1
ANNELIDA
Oligochaeta SI 4 34143 22 4 20
W 3 12 521 6 61 72 82 5
Hirudinea S
W 1 1 1 15 1 5
Dina parva S 2 4 3 3 4 25 14 9 122 67
W
OSTRACODA S 1
W
ISOPODA
Lieerus. sp. S
W 2 2
Asellus sp. S
W 1
AMPHIPODA S 1
W
Hyalella azteca S 2
W 2
Synurella sp. S 1
W
DECAPODA S 1 112 1 1
W 12 1
HYDRACARINA S 13444 15 22
W 1 1
COLLEMBOLA
Isotoma sp S
W
PLECOPTERA
Pteroiiarcys sp. S
W
* Sm August 1970; W- February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
Peltoperla sp. *S
*W 1
Taeniopteryx sp. S
W 11
Nemoura s.pp. S
W 1 1 14 4 7 39 30
Neoperla sp S
W 1
Neophasganophora sp.S
W 1 3 3
Acroneuria sp. S 7 5
W 2 15 3
Paragnetina sp. S
W
Isogenus sp. S
W
Alloperla sp. S
W 1 15
1
1
EPHEMEROPTERA
Tricorythodes
albilineatus S179 15 74 4 77 40 38 49 42 49 69 1 26 30 9 8
W
Caenia hilaris S 2
W
Ephemerella spp. S
W 931856 1 20 1 14
Centroptilum sp. S
W 114 2 1
Isonychia spp. S 510 4 1 179
W 14 1 1 35
Stenonema spp. S 4 26 10 18 13 54 34 11 61 9 20 6 6 8 6 6 2 20
W 4 25 19 18 10 20 26 30 35 5 65 1 9 6 10 1 42
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
Stenonema Carolina *S 2
*W
Stenonema exiguum S 3 6 4
W
Stenonema
interpunc tatum S 4 4 5 10
W
Stenonema proximum S 4 5
W
Stenonema rubrum S 2
W
ODONATA
Gomphus sp. S 1
W
Boyeria vinosa S
W 1
Hetaerina sp. S 1
W
Argia sp. S 233 2335 1
W
Argia moesta
putrida S
W 1 111
Argia translate S 2 1 2 1
W
HEMIPTERA
Veliidae S 1
W
Rheumatobates sp. S 1
W
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 1DR 11 12L 12R 13
MEGALOPTERA
Corydalus cornutus *S 3 1
*W 1
TRICHOPTERA
2
2 1
11 1 1 63
3 7 1 20
1
1 3
2
Hydropsyche sp.
S 1 5 2
1
23
W
2
1
13
Cheumatopsyche sp.
S
146
1 22
1
W
24
6
Chimarra sp.
S
W
1
Oecetis sp.
S
1
1
W
Pycnopsyche sp.
S
w
1
COLEOPTERA
Dineutus sp.
S
1
w
Helichus sp.
S
w
Stenelmis sp.
S
1
w
3
Macronychus
glabratus
S
1 2
w
1
1
Aneyronyx
variegatus
S
2
w
4 1
2
Unidentified
coleoptera
S
1
w
1
1
1
1
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
_ Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
DIPTERA
Tipulidae
Hexatoma sp. *S 1
*W
Simuliidae SI 4 1 2 2 8 67 29 23 4 64 44 228 8
W 6 2 17
Chironomidae
Conshapelopia sp. S 2
W 1 1
Ablabesmyia sp. S
W 11
Ablabesmyia
auriensis S 12
W 1
Ablabesmyia jante SI 1 3181 73
W
Ablabesmyia
mallochi SI 16 111
W
Ablabesmyia
ornata S 1
W 1
Procladius sp. S 9 1
W
Procladius
culiciformis S
W 1
Diamesa longimanus S
W 1
Brillia slavirons S
W 12 3 1
* S =August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACRO INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PRE IMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
L 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L
Organisms
Diplocladius sp. *S
*W 1
Hanocladius
alternantherae S 2
W
Hanocladius sp. 2
(Roback *57) S
W
Orthocladius sp. S
W
Orthocladius m. sp.
2
(Roback '57)
S
W
Cricotopus si).
s
W
Cricotopus m.sp.2
(Roback '57)
s
w
Cricotopus
bicinctus
s
w
Cricotopus
slossonae
s
W
Cricotopus
trifasciatus
s
w
Trichocladius sp.
s
w
Trichocladius
robacki
s
w
1
1 1
4 1 3 1
1 4 3 1 1 44 8
1
1
7
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
Stations
Organisms 1L 1R 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L 6R 7 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
Psec trocladius sp. *S
*W 1
Metriocnemus sp. S
W 13
Metriocnemus
lundbecki S
W 1
Corynoneura
(thienemanniella)
xena S 1
W 1
Parachironomus
pectinatellae S 4 1
W
Dicrotendipes sp. S 1
W
Polypedilum sp. S 1 11 1 3
W
Polypedilum
halrerale S
W 1
Polypedilum sp. A
(Roback '53) S
W 113 7
Tanytarsus sp. S
W 1
Tanytarsus sp. B
(Beck) S
W
2
1
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT SURVEY
(Per Limestone SamjSer Exposed for Five Weeks)
Organisms
Stations
Rheotanytarsus
exiguus
GASTROPODA
Physa sp.
Goniebasis sp.
PELECYPODA
Corbicula sp.
TOTAL SPP.
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS
*S
*W
S
W
S
w
w
S 11
w -
w -
RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF
THE MAJOR TAXA:
Worms
Crustaceans
Insects
Mollusks
S 2
W
S 1
w -
S 191
W
S 113
W -
1R
2L
2R
3L
3R
4 5L
5R
6L
6R
7
8
9 10L
1
1
1
1
3
1
11
6
5
2
6
14
2
25
10
7
1
3
1
1
1
8
12
8
7
10
15 11
11
19
13
12
6
5
11
5
12
9
5
2
20 11
20
-
26
3
17
9
6
67
108
41
110
70
746 355
105
200
123
206
29
18
105
12
50
35
23
11
103 92
138
111
10
100
29
27
1
6
4
0
0
0 6
7
1
8
28
0
0
16
4
13
5
2
1
0 7
77
-
7
2
0
0
9
0
1
1
0
2
0 4
5
6
4
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1 1
4
-
0
0
0
3
0
52
99
11
100
60
746 Ml
92
193
100
172
28
18
83
5
36
29
21
10
102 84
48
-
104
8
100
26
18
14
2
25
10
8
0 4
1
0
11
6
0
0
5
3
1
1
0
0
0 0
9
0
0
0
0
0
12 6
7 26
21 117
0
0
1
3
11
2
5
1
272 22
18 114
2 0
0 0
2
6
56
8
11
32
126
11
2
1
13
.14
2
20
13
88
22
34
56
17
22
293
173
0
0
2
1
291
172
0
0
*S = August 1970; W = February 1971
i
VO
-------
1-10
APPENDIX I (cont'd)
SUMMER AND WINTER MACROINVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS
FOR WEST POINT PREIMPOUNDMENT STUDY
(Per Limestone Sampler Exposed for Five Weeks)
_______ Stations
— IS 2L 2R 3L 3R 4 5L 5R 6L
RANGE *S 1-179 1-26 1-74 1-25 1-77 1-40 1-510 1-67 1-49 1-61
*W - 1-4 i_25 1-19 1-18 1-10 1-24 1-44 1-61 1
Stations
-6R' _ 1 8 9 10L 10R 11 12L 12R 13
s 1-49 1-69 1-11 1-9 1-44 1-228 1-9 1-122 1-67 1-179
W 1-35 2-5 1-65 1-15 1-9 1-9 1-39 1-6 - 1-42
* S = August 1970; W = February 1971
-------
APPENDIX J
Georgia Water Quality Standards
and
Chattachoochee River Classification
-------
J-2
RULES
OF
STATE WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
CHAPTER 730-3
WATER USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
7 30-3-.01 Purpo s e
730-3-.02 Definitions
730-3-.03 Water Use
Classifications
730-3-.04 General Criteria
for All Waters
730-3-.05 Specific Criteria
for Classified
Water Usage
730-3-.06 Exceptions
7 3 0-3-.07 Tr ea tment
Requirements
730-3-.08 Streamflows
730-3-.09 Mixing Zone-
730-3-.10 Notwithstanding
the Foregoing
730-3-.11 Effective Date
730-3-.01 PURPOSE - The purpose of this rule is to establish
water quality standards for prevention of pollution, enhancement of
water quality and protection of public health or welfare, in accor-
dance with the public interest in drinking water supplies, conser-
vation of fish, game and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricul-
tural, industrial, recreational and other beneficial uses.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
730-3-.02 DEFINITIONS - All terms used in this rule shall be
interpreted in accordance with definitions as set forth in the Act
and as otherwise herein defined.
(1) "Reasonable and necessary uses" mean drinking water
supplies, conservation of fish, game and other aquatic life, agri-
cultural, industrial, recreational and other legitimate uses.
(2) "Shellfish" refers to clams, oysters, scallops, mussels
and other mollusks.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
-------
J-3
730-3-.03 WATER USE CLASSIFICATIONS - Water use classifications
for which the criteria of this rulet are applicable are as follows:
(1) Drinking Water Supplies
(2) Recreation
(3) Fishing, Propagation of Fish, Shellfish, Game and Other
Aquatic Life,
(4) Agricultural
(5) Industrial
(6) Navigation
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p.416, as amended.
730-3-.04 GENERAL CRITERIA FOR ALL WATERS - The following
criteria are deemed to be necessary and applicable to all waters o
the State:
(1) All waters shall be free from materials associated with
municipal or domestic sewage, industrial waste or any ot er w
which will settle to form sludge deposits that become putresce ,
unsightly or otherwise objectionable.
(2) All waters shall be free from oil, scum and floating
debris associated with municipal or domestic sewage, n us *
waste or other discharges in amounts sufficient to e uns g
to interfere with legitimate water uses.
(3) All waters shall be free from material related to
pal, Industrial or other discharges which pro uc t-h' lealti-
odoi or other objectionable conditions which interfere with Ugiti
mate water uses.
(4) All waters shall be free from toxic, ^^Jes
and caustic substances discharged from murt P ^^^ which
or other sources in amounts, concentration
are harmful to humans, animals or aquatic
(5) The maximum permissible ^^^^^it^which are
in the waters of the State must confo j1nactive Materials", of
cited in Chapter 270-5-20, "Control ^ , »1U
the Rules and Regulations of the Georgia Department
Health.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416. «» amended.
730-3-.05 SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR "Quired"to
following criteria are deemed necessary and shall be requir
the specific water usage as shown:
-------
J-4
(1) Drinking Water Supplies -
(a) Those waters approved by the Georgia Department of
Public Health and requiring only approved disinfection
and meeting the requirements of the latest edition of
"Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards"; or
waters approved by the Georgia Department of Public
Health for human consumption and food-processing or for
any other use requiring water of a lower quality.
1. Bacteria: Fecal coliform not to exceed a mean
of 50 per 100 ml (MPN) based on at least four
samples taken over a 30-day period and not to exceed
200 per 100 ml in more than five percent of the
samples in any 90-day period.
2. Floating solids, settleable solids, sludge
deposits or any taste, odor or color producing
substances: None associated with any waste discharge.
3. Sewage, industrial or other wastes: None.
(b) Those raw water supplies requiring approved treatment
to meet the requirements of the Georgia Department of
Public Health and the latest edition of "Public Health
Service Drinking Water Standards" or which are approved
by the Georgia Department of Public Health for human
consumption and food-processing; or for any other use
requiring water of a lower quality.
1. Bacteria: Fecal coliform not to exceed a mean
of 5,000 per 100 ml (MPN) based on at least four
samples taken over a 30-day period and not to exceed
20,000 per 100 ml in more than five percent of the
samples taken in any 90-day period.
2. Dissolved Oxygen: Not less than 4.0 mg/1 at any
time; a minimum of 5.0 mg/1 at all times for waters
designated as trout streams by the State Game and
Fish Commission.
3. pH: Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5.
4. No material or substance in such concentration
that, after treatment, would exceed the requirements
of the Georgia Department of Public Health and the
latest edition of "Public Health Service Drinking
Water Standards".
-------
J-5
5. Temperature: Not to exceed 93.2°F. (34.0°C.) at
any time and not to be increased*more than 10°F.
above intake temperature. In streams designated as
trout waters by the State Game and Fish Commission,
there shall be no elevation or depression of natural
stream temperatures.
(2) Recreation - General recreational activities such as water
skiing, boating and swimming, or for any other use requiring water
of a lower quality. These criteria are not to be interpreted as
condoning water contact sports in proximity to sewage or industrial
waste discharges regardless of treatment requirements imposed on
such waters.
(a) Bacteria: Fecal coliform not to exceed a mean of
1 000 per 100 ml (MPN) based on at least four samples
taken over a 30-day period, and not to exceed 4,000 per
100 ml in more than five percent of the samples taken in
any 90-day period.
(b) Dissolved oxygen: Not less than 4.0 mg/1 except
that those streams designated as trout waters by the
State Game and Fish Commission must have a minimum of
5.0 mg/1 at all times.
(c) pH; Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5.
(d) Toxic Wastes, Other Deleterious Materials: None in
concentrations that would harm man, fish and game or
other beneficial aquatic life.
(e) Temperature: Not to exceed 93.2°F. (34.0°C.) at any
time and not to be increased more than 10°F. above intake
temperature. In streams designated as trout waters by
the State Game and Fish Commission, there shall be no
elevation or depression of natural stream temperatures.
(3) Fishing, Propagation of Fish, Shellfish, Game and Other
Aquatic Life; or for any other use requiring water of a lower
quality.
(a) Dissolved Oxygen: A minimum of 5.0 mg/1 at all
times for streams designated as trout waters by the State
Game and Fish Commission; a minimum of 4.0 mg/1 at all
times for waters supporting warm water species of fish.
(b) pH: Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5.
(c) Bacteria: Fecal coliform not to exceed a mean of
5,000 per 100 ml (HPN) based on at least four samples
taken ^ver a 30-day period and not to exceed 20,000 per
-------
J-6
100 ml in more than five percent of the samples in any
90-day period.
(d) Bacteria: (Applicable only to shellfish to be
commercially harvested.) Total coliform group not to
exceed a median MPN of 70 per 100 ml, and not more than
10 percent of the samples shall exceed an MPN of 230 per
100 ml for a 5-tube decimal dilution test (or 330 per
100 ml where a 3-tube decimal dilution is used) in those
areas most probably exposed to fecal contamination during
the most unfavorable hydrographic and pollution conditions.*
(e) Temperature: Not to exceed 93.2°F. (34.0°C.) at any
time and not to be increased more than 10°F. above intake
temperature. In streams designated as trout waters by
the State Game and Fish Commission, there shall be no
elevation or depression of natural stream temperatures.
-------
J-7
(5) Industrial: For processing and cooling water with or
without special treatment; or for any other use requiring water
of a lower quality.
(a) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 3.0 mg/1 and
not less than 2.5 mg/1 at any time.
(b) pH: Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5.
(c) Toxic Substances, Other Deleterious Materials: None
in amounts or concentrations that would prevent fish
survival or interfere with legitimate and beneficial
industrial uses.
(d) Temperature: Not to exceed 93.2°F. (34.0°C.) at any
time and not to be increased more than 10°F. above intake
temperature.
(6) Navigation: To provide for commercial ship traffic and
protection of seamen or crews.
(a) Bacteria: Fecal coliform not to exceed a mean of
10,000 per 100 ml (MPN) based on at least four samples
taken over a 30-day period and not to exceed 40,000 per
100 ml in more than five percent of the samples in any
90-day period.
(b) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 3.0 mg/1 and
no less than 2.5 mg/1 at any time.
(c) pH: Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5.
(d) Toxic Substances, Deleterious Materials: None in
concentrations or amounts that would damage vessels,
prevent fish survival or otherwise interfere with
commercial navigation.
(e) Temperature: Not to exceed 93.2°F. (34.0°C.) at any
time and not to be increased more than 10°F. above intake
temperature.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
730-3-.06 EXCEPTIONS - It is recognized that certain natural
waters of the State may have a quality that will not be within the
general or specific requirements contained herein; therefore, the
Board is empowered to make exceptions to the requirements upon
presentation of adequate justification.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
-------
J-8
730-3-.07 TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS - Notwithstanding the above
criteria, the requirements of the Board relating to secondary or
equivalent treatment for all waste shall prevail. The adoption of
these criteria shall in no way preempt the treatment requirements.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended,
730-3-.08 STREAMFLOWS - Specific criteria or standards set
for the various parameters apply to all flows on regulated streams.
On unregulated streams, they shall apply to all streamflows equal
to or exceeding the 7-day, 10-year minimum flow.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
730-3-.09 MIXING ZONE - Effluents released to streams or
impounded waters shall be fully and homogeneously dispersed and
mixed insofar as practical with the main flow or water body by
appropriate methods at the discharge point. Use of a reasonable
and limited mixing zone may be permitted on receipt of satisfactory
evidence that such a zone is necessary and that it will not create
an objectionable or damaging pollution condition.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
730-3-.10 NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING - The Board may
authorize deviations from such standards, as the public interest
may require or permit, consistent with Sections 2, 3(f), and 5(10)
of the Act.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
730-3-.11 EFFECTIVE DATE - This Chapter shall become effective
on June 13, 1967.
Authority: Ga. Laws 1964, p. 416, as amended.
-------
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER (HEADWATERS - WEST POINT DAM)
Stream
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Description
Headwaters to Buford Dam
Buford Dam to Atlanta (Peachtree Creek)
Atlanta (Peachtree Creek) to Cedar Creek
Cedar Creek to Franklin, Ga. (U. S. Highway 27)
U. S. Highway 27 Bridge at Franklin, Ga. to West Point Dam
-------
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER (WEST POINT DAM - GA. HWY. 91" AT NEAL'S LANDING)
Stream
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Description
West Point Dam to West Point Mfg. Co. Water Intake
West Point Mfg. Co. Water Intake to Osanippa Creek
Osanlppa Creek to Columbus, Ga. (14th Street Bridge)
Columbus, Ga. (14th Street Bridge) to Cowikee Creek
Cowlkee Creek to Great Southern Div. of Great Northern
Paper Company
Great Southern Dlv. of Great Northern Paper Company to
Ga. Hwy. 91 (Neal's Landing)
ft
c
o
«
o
*r4
00
•H
U
ts
60
u
<0
t4 U
4J
a
<0
0)
O
CO
(so
U
c «
3
o
•H
-------
CHATTAHOOCHEE, OCHLOCKNEE, AUCILLA AND LOWER FLINT RIVERS
Stream Description
Chattahoochee River Ga. Hwy. 91 (Neal's Landing) to Jim Woodruff Dam
Ochlocknee River Headwaters to Georgia-Florida State Line
Aucilla River Headwaters to Georgia-Florida State Line
(Including Aucilla Creek)
Lower Flint River Albany-Georgia Power Company Dam at Lake Worth to
Bainbridge - U. S. Hwy. 84 Bridge
Lower Flint River Bainbridge - U. S. Hwy. 84 Bridge to Jim Woodruff Dam,
Lake Seminole
-------
PARTICIPATING STAFF
Herbert C. Barden
Bobby J. Carroll
Wm. Rodney Davis
Ralph E. Gentry
Ray N. Hemphill
David W. Hill
Charles Holland
Wilburn F. Holsomback
John A. Little
Hoke S. Howard
Robert F. Schneider
Hugh C. Vick
M. Ronald Weldon
Tensey Whitmire
Roy A. Wiemert
Raymond T. Wilkerson
Microbiologist
Microbiologist
Chemist
Microbiologist
Chemist
Sanitary Engineer
Technician
Computer Operator
Sanitary Engineer
Technician
Aquatic Biologist
Technician
Aquatic Biologist
Stenographer
Technician
Technician
-------
FIGURE 3
i l i I t I A
imtta »t
ei sts
L*H£TT
CIOICU
^ i\ \/Z>f-
------- |