Federal Facilities
Environmental Compliance
Prof ile

Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
July 1984

-------
Federal Facilities
Environmental Compliance
Profile

Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
July 1984

LIBRARY
US EPA Region 4
AFC/9thFL Tower
61 Forsyth St. 3.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303*3104

Arthur G. Linton
Federal Activities Coordinator

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES

REGION IV



Mai

or Media

Alabama

CWA

CAA

RCRA

USA Redstone Arsenal

X

X

X

USA Fort Rucker ATC

X





USA Fort McClellan



X



USA Anniston Army Depot

X

X

X

*USA Alabama AAP







*USAF Maxwe11/Gunter







*USVA Hospital, Tuskegee







NASA G.C. Marshall Space Center





X

TVA Fabius Preparation Plant

X





TVA NFDC Muscle Shoals

X

X

X

TVA Wilson Power Service Center







*TVA widows Creek Steam Plant

X

X



*TVA Brown Ferry Nuclear

X





*TVA Bellefonte Nuclear

X





*TVA Colbert Steam Plant

X

X



Florida







USN NAS Jacksonville

X

X

X

USN NAS Pensacola

X



X

USN NAS Cecil Field



X



USN Naval Training Center



X



USN NAS and Annex, Key West







USN NS Mayport

X

X



*USN Coastal Systems Center







*No Profile

-------
-2-



Mai

or Media



CWA

CAA

RCRA

*USN NAS Whiting Field







*USN NAS Saufley Field







*USN Fuel Depot, Jacksonville



X



USAF Patrick AFB



X



USAF Homestead AFB







USAF Elgin AFB



X



*USAF Hurlburt Field







USAF Tyndall AFB



X



*USAF Cape Canaveral AFS



X



USAF Mac Dill AFB





X

*USA Camp Blanding







NASA Kennedy Space Flight Center



X

X

*USCG Mayport Station







*Seminole Tribe - Big Cypress







*DLA DFSP Lynn Haven







*U.S. Department of Interior (DOI)
FWS Ding Darling National Refuge







*VA Hospital, Gainesville



X



*VA Hospital, Miami



X



*DOE Pinellas



X



Georgia







USA Fort Benning

X

X



USA Fort Gordon

X

X



*No Profile

-------


Ma"

or Media



CWA

CAA

RCRA

USA Fort Stewart

X

X



USA Hunter AA Field

X





*USA Camp Merrill, Dahlonega







U.S.M.C. Marine Corps Supply Center

X



X

USN Fleet Ballistic MSSB





X

*USN NAS Atlanta



X



USAF Air Force Plant #6

X



X

USAF Moody Air Force Base







USAF Dobbins Air Force Base







USAF Robins Air Force Base

X

X

X

USVA V.A. Center, Dublin



X



*USVA V.A. Hospital, Decatur



X



*USVA V.A. Hospital, Augusta



X



*USVA V.A. Hospital, Lenwood



X



*Department of Justice (DOJ)
Federal Law Enforcement
Training Center



X



*U.S.(DOI) FWS Okefenokee Refuge







Kentucky







USA Fort Knox

X





USA Lexington-Blue Grass
Depot Activity



X

X

USA Fort Campbell

X





USN Navel Ordinance Station



X



DOE Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

X

X

X

*U.S.(DOJ) Bureau of Prisons

Federal Correctional Institution







*No Profile

-------
-4-



Ma*

or Media



CWA

CAA

RCRA

*US Department of Labor - Whitney Young







*USDI NPS Mammoth Cave Great Onyx
Job Corps Center







*TVA Paradise Steam Plant

X

X



*TVA Shawnee Steam Plant

X

X



Mississippi







USA Mississippi AAP





X

*USA COE Experiment Station







USAF Columbus AFB







USAF Keesler AFB





X

*USN NAS Meridan







*USN Naval CB Center







*NASA National Space Technical Lab.







*USDA National Monitoring and Residue
Analysis Lab.





X

*TVA Yellow Creek Nuclear

X





*USDI BIA Choctaw School (4 Sites)







"Choctaw Utility Commission (6 Sites)







North Carolina







USA Fort Bragg

X



X

*USAF Pope AFB



X



*USAF Seymour Johnson AFB



X



USN MCB Camp Lejeune

X



X

USN MCAS Cherry Point

X

X

X

*USCG Support Center, Elizabeth City





X

*No Profile

-------
-5-



Ma-

or Media



CWA

CAA

RCRA

*USDA F.S.S.E. Forrest Experimental
Station







*Cherokee Indian Reservation (7 Sites)







*USDL Kittrell Job Center







South Carolina







*USA Fort Jackson



X



USAF Myrtle AFB







*USAF Charleston AFB







*USAF Shaw AFB





X

*USAF McEntire ANG Base







*USN M.C. Parris Island Depot







*USN MCAS Beaufort Air Station







*USN Beaufort Hospital







USN Naval Weapons Station







*USN M.C. Combat Vehicle Maintenance







*USN Charleston Shipyard



X

X

*DLA Defense Fuel Support Center



X



DOE Savannah River Operations

X

X

X

Tennessee







USA Milian Army Ammunition Plant

X

X

X

USA Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant

X



X

USA Holston Army Ammunition Plant

X

X

X

USN NAS Memphis

X

X

X

*USAF Arnold Engineering Development
Center



X



*DLA Defense Depot Memphis





X

*No Profile

-------
DOE Oak Ridge National Lab (K-10)

DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion
Plant (K-25)

DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

DOE Clinch River Breeder Reactor
*DOE Oak Ridge Animal Research Lab
*LJSDA F.S. Jacobs CCC Center
*TVA Allen Steam Plant
*TVA Bull Run Steam Plant
*TVA Gallatin Steam Plant
*TVA John Sevier Steam Plant
*TVA Johnsonville Steam Plant
*TVA Kingston Steam Plant
*TVA Watts Bar Steam Plant
*TVA Cumberland Steam Plant
*TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Plant
*TVA Sequayah Nuclear Plant

*No Profile

-------
& 1UIM1 MUflMl fCiUtiKAL f'ALi 1 LIT 1 Kb

COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984

NAME

OUT	II/IV(2)

OUT	11(4)

IN	1(2)

OUT	II/IV(2)

		CAA	CWA	RCRA	CERCLA

Alabama

USA Redstone Arsenal	IN	IN

USA Fort Rucker ATC	IN	OUT

USA Fort McClellan	IN	IN

USA Anniston Army Depot	IN	OUT

*USA Alabama AAP (GSA Sale)	IN	IN	IN	II/IV(1)

USA Maxwell	IN	IN	IN	I

USAF Gunter	IN	IN	IN	I

*USVA Hospital, Tuskegee	IN	IN

NASA G.C. Marshall Space Center IN	IN	IN	NONE

TVA Fabius Preparation Plant	IN OUT	IN	NONE

TVA NFDC Muscle Shoals	IN	IN	IN	1(1)

TVA Wilson Power Service Center IN	IN	IN	II

*TVA Widows Creek Steam Plant	IN	IN	IN	NONE

*TVA Brown Ferry Nuclear	IN	IN	IN	NONE

*TVA Bellefonte Nuclear	IN	IN	IN	NONE

*TVA Colbert Steam Plant	IN	IN	IN	NONE

TOXICS

DDT
PCB
PCB,Agents
PCB,Agents
NONE
NONE
NONE

PCB

NONE

NONE

PCB

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY' 84

WATER

NONE

NONE

WATER

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

RCRA

WATER

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

*No Profile

Page 1 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT federal facilities

COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984











EPA—IV

NAME
Florida

CAA

CWA

RCRA

CERCLA

TOXICS

TARGETS
FY' 84

USN

NAS Jacksonville

IN

OUT

OUT

11(11)

PCB

WATER

USN

NAS Pensacola

IN

OUT

IN

11(7)

PCB

WATER,RCRA

USN

NAS Cecil Field

IN

IN

IN

11(1)

PCB

NONE

USN

Naval Training Center

IN

IN

IN

NONE

PCB

NONE

USN

NAS and Annex, Key West

IN

OUT

OUT

I

PEST.

NONE

USN

NS Mayport

IN

IN

OUT

NONE

NONE

RCRA

*USN

Coastal Systems Center

IN

—

—

—

—

NONE

*USN

NAS Whiting Field

IN

—

—

—

—

NONE

*USN

NAS Saufley Field

IN

—

—

—

—

NONE

*USN

Fuel Depot, Jacksonville

IN

—

—

—

—

NONE

USAF

Patrick AFB

IN

IN

IN

I

PCB

NONE

USAF

Homestead AFB

IN

OUT

IN

II

NONE

NONE

USAF

Elgin AFB

IN

IN

IN

11(5)

DIOXIN

NONE

*USAF

Hurlburt Field

IN

—

—

—

—

NONE

USAF

Tyndall AFB

IN

IN

OUT

II

PCB

NONE

*No Profile

Page 2 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984

NAME

USAF Cape Canaveral AFS
USAF Mac Dill AFB
*USA Camp Blanding

CAA

IN
IN
IN

NASA Kennedy Space Flight Center IN

*USCG Mayport Station	IN

*Seminole Tribe - Big Cypress	IN

*DLA DFSP Lynn Haven

*U.S. Department of Interior(DOI)
FWS Ding Darling National
Refuge

*VA Hospital, Gainesville	IN

*VA Hospital, Miami	IN

*DOE Pinellas	IN
Georgia

USA Fort Benning	IN

USA Fort Gordon	IN

USA Fort Stewart	IN

*USA Hunter AA Field	IN

CWA

IN

IN

IN
IN

C

IN

OUT

RCRA

IN

OUT

IN
IN
IN
IN

CERCLA

11(3)

II

I
I
I
I

TOXICS

PCB

NONE

PCB
PEST.
PEST.
PEST.

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY 1 84

NONE

NONE

NONE

RCRA

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

*No Profile

Page 3 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984











EPA-IV



NAME

CAA

CWA

RCRA

CERCLA

TOXICS

TARGETS
FY' 84

*USA Camp Merrill, Dahlonege

IN

IN

—

NONE

—

NONE

U.S.M.C. Marine Corps Supply
Center

IN

IN

OUT

I

PCB

RCRA

USN

Fleet Ballistic MSSB

IN

IN

IN

NON E(4)

PCB

NONE

*USN

NAS Atlanta

IN

IN

—

II

—

NONE

USAF

Air Force Plant #6

IN

IN

OUT

11(1)

NONE

RCRA

USAF

Moody Air Force Base

OUT

IN

IN

II

PCB

NONE

USAF

Dobbins Air Force Base

IN

IN

IN

II

NONE

NONE

USAF

Robins Air Force Base

IN

IN

IN

II

PCB

WATER

USVA

V.A. Center, Dublin

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

*USVA

V.A. Hospital, Decatur

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

*USVA

V.A. Hospital, Augusta

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

*USVA

V.A. Hospital, Lenwood

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

~Department of Justice (DOJ)
Federal Law Enforcement
Training Center

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

*U.S.

[DOI) FWS Okefenokee Refuge

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

NONE

*No Profile

Page 4 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984

NAME

Kentucky

USA Fort Knox

USA Lexington-Blue Grass
Depot Activity

USA Fort Campbell

USN Navel Ordinance Station

DOE Paducah Gaseous Diffusion
Plant

CAA

IN

IN
IN
IN

IN

*U.S.(DOJ) Bureau of Prisons

Federal Correctional Institution IN

*U.S. Department of Labor -
Whitney Young

*USDI NPS Mammoth Cave Great
Onyx Job Corps Center

*TVA Paradise Steam Plant

*TVA Shawnee Steam Plant

Mississippi

USA Mississippi AAP

*USA COE Experiment Station

USAF Columbus AFB

USAF Keesler AFB

*No Profile

IN

IN
IN
IN

OUT

IN
IN
IN

CWA

IN

IN

OUT

IN

IN

IN

IN

IN
IN
IN

IN
IN
IN
IN

RCRA

IN

IN
IN

OUT

IN

IN

IN
IN

CERCLA

11(2)
I

NONE
NONE

I
I

TOXICS

PEST.

AGENTS
PCB
PCB

PCB

NONE

PCB
PCB

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY' 84

NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE

AIR
NONE
NONE
NONE

Page 5 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES





COMPLIANCE

STATUS







June 1984











EPA-IV

NAME

CAA

CWA

RCRA

CERCLA

TOXICS

TARGETS
FY' 84

*USN NAS Meridan

IN

IN

—

—

PCB

NONE

*USN Naval CB Center

IN

IN

IN

1(5)

DIOXIN

NONE

*NASA National Space Technical
Laboratory

IN

IN

IN

NONE

DIOXIN

NONE

*USDA National Monitoring and
Residue Analysis Laboratory

IN

IN

OUT

NONE

NONE

NONE

*TVA Yellow Creek Nuclear

IN

IN

—

—

—

NONE

*USDI BIA Choctaw School
(4 Sites)

IN

IN

—

—

—

NONE

*Choctaw Utility Commission
(6 Sites)

IN

IN

—

—

—

NONE

North Carolina













USA Fort Bragg

IN

IN

IN

1(1)

PEST.

NONE

USAF Pope AFB

IN

IN

IN

I

NONE

NONE

USAF Seymore Johnson AFB

IN

OUT

IN

I

PCB

NONE

USN MCB Camp Lejeune

IN

IN

IN

11(13)

PCB

NONE

USN MCAS Cherry Point

IN

IN

OUT

11(12)

PCB

WATER,RCRA

*USCG Support Center,
Elizabeth City

IN

IN

NONE

PCB

NONE

*No Profile

Page 6 of 9

-------
June 1984

NAME

*USDA F.S.S.E. Forrest
Experimental Station

*Cherokee Indian Reservation
(7 Sites)

*USDL Kittrell Job Center

South Carolina

*USA Fort Jackson

USAF Myrtle AFB

*USAF Charleston AFB

USAF Shaw AFB

*USAF McEntire ANG Base

USN M.C. Paris Island Depot

*USN MCAS Beaufort Air Station

*USN Beaufort Hospital

USN Naval Weapons Station

*USN M.C. Combat Vehicle
Maintenance

*USN Charleston Shipyard

*DLA Defense Fuel Support Center

DOE Savannah River Operations

*No Profile

SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

CAA	CWA	RCRA	CERCLA	TOXICS

IN

IN

IN

NONE

NONE

IN
IN

OUT IN
IN	IN

NONE
NONE

NONE
NONE

IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN

IN
IN
IN
IN

IN
IN
IN
IN
IN

IN

OUT
OUT

IN
IN

IN

OUT

OUT

IN

IN

I

11(2)
I

11(2)
I
I
I

PCB

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

NONE

PCB

OUT

OUT

II

TCE

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY' 84

NONE

NONE
NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE
WATER
Page 7 of 9

-------
SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

June 1984

NAME

Tennessee

USA Milian Army Ammunition
Plant

USA Volunteer Army Ammunition
Plant

USA Holston Army Ammunition
Plant

USA NAS Memphis

USAF Arnold Engineering
Development Center

*DLA Defense Depot Memphis

CAA

IN

IN

IN
IN

IN
IN

DOE Oak Ridge National Lab.(K-lO)	IN

DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion

(K-25)	IN

DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant	IN

DOE Clinch River Breeder Reactor	IN

*DOE Oak Ridge Animal Research

Laboratory	IN

*USDA F.S. Jacobs CCC Center	IN

*TVA Allen Steam Plant	IN

CWA

IN

IN

IN
IN

OUT

IN

OUT

IN

(

IN

IN
IN
IN

OUT

RCRA

CERCLA

OUT II & IV

IN	II

OUT
OUT

OUT

OUT

OUT
OUT

II
I

II

II
II

TOXICS

PCB

PCB

NONE
PEST.

PCB

PCB

PCB
PCB

NONE

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY' 84

WATER,RCRA

NONE

RCRA
NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE

NONE

WATER

NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE

*No Profile

Page 8 of 9

-------
June 1984
NAME

*TVA Bull Run Steam Plant
*TVA Gallatin Steam Plant
*TVA John Sevier Steam Plant
*TVA Johnsonville Steam Plant
*TVA Kingston Steam Plant
*TVA Watts Bar Steam Plant
*TVA Sequayah Nuclear Plant

TOTAL 126 Facilities
*No Profile

SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE STATUS

CAA

CWA

RCRA

CERCLA

TOXICS

EPA-IV

TARGETS
FY 1 84

IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN

IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN

NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE

Under CERCLA: I, II, III, IV shows the IRP Phase.

The figure in parenthesisi is the number of
CERCLA 103(c) notifications.

Page 9 of 9

-------
FEDERAL FACILITIES NPDES PERMIT STATUS

JUNE 1984

State

Total
Permits

Significant
Facilities
Permits

Current
Permits

Significant
Current
Permits

Total
Expired
Permits

New Permit
Applications

Alabama

46

15

26

15

20

3

Florida*

48

30

35

21

13

0

Georgia

41

14

41

14

0

0

Kentucky

77

12

57

7

20

1

Mississippi

48

19

30

9

18

10

North Carolina

* 45

12

36

12

9

0

South Carolina

21

11

20

11

1

1

Tennessee*

124

27

98

12

26

3

Total

450

140

343

101

107

17

*Non Delegated

States











Note: Permits

written by

Federal

Facilities

•Program except

for sixteen (16)



steam and nuclear plants.

-------
FEDERAL FACILITIES

Active

State Notifier	Part A

Alabama	23	9

Florida	53	12

Georgia	23	10

Kentucky	12	4

Mississippi	10	4

North Carolina	40	5

South Carolina	15	6

Tennessee	60	11

RCRA STATUS

Filed Part

A, but has	Has

since with- interim	Part B Part B

drawn	 status	requested issued

6 9	2 -

4 13	2 1

0 10	4 -

13	3-

0 4	11

24 5	7 -

16	3-

4 11	4 -

Note: Numbers in 3rd Column under "Filed Part A, but has since withdrawn" are not
included as a part of the numbers listed under "Active Part A" in Column 2.

-------
Federal Facilities
Hazardous Waste Storage Facilities
To Be Constructed

Region IV

Fiscal Year
to be
Budgeted

Alabama

Anniston Army Depot	85

Marshall Space Flight Center	84

Anniston	85

Fort McClellan	86

Huntsville DPO	84

Fort Rucker	84

Montgomery DPO	84

Florida

Naval Air Station - Cecil Field	84

Naval Station - Mayport	83

J.F. Kennedy Space Center	85

Key West DPO	86

Homestead AFB	83

Tyndall AFB	85

Eglin AFB	83

Orlando DPO	86

Patrick AFB	85

Jacksonville NAS	86

Pensacola NAS	83

MacDill AFB	85

Georgia

Robins AFB	85

Moody AFB	85

Fort Benning	85

Fort Gordon	86

Fort Stewart	85

Albany DPO	84

Kings Bay OSB	85

Kentucky

Fort Campbell	85

Fort Knox	83

Lexington DPO	86

Naval Ordinance Station	85

-------
Federal Facilities
Hazardous Waste Storage Facilities
To Be Constructed

Region IV

Fiscal Year
to be
Budgeted

Mississippi

Columbus AFB	85

Keesler AFB	83

North Carolina

Fort Bragg	86

Goldsboro AFB	83

Cherry Point MCAS	83

South Carolina

Naval Weapons Station	84

Charleston DPO	86

Fort Jackson	83

Parris Island MCS	86

Myrtle Beach AFB	86

Shaw AFB	83

Tennessee

Defense Depot - Memphis	85

Oak Ridge Operations	85

NAS Memphis	84

Note: High Priority Effort.

These hazardous waste storage facilities are to
be constructed by Defense Logistics Agency on
the facility named. They are to be permitted
to the base commander. Special effort will be
required to issue RCRA permits as quickly as
possible so construction will not be delayed.
The average permitting time will be 4 to 8
months as estimated by the various states.

-------
CERCLA
IR Program Description

The IR program is divided into four phases and is responsive to
CERCLA and E. 0. 12316.

Phase I of the IR program is an installation assessment. In

this phase, installation files are examined, current employees

and key former employees are interviewed, and the terrain and

facilities are examined. Limited soil and water sampling may

also be conducted to determine if contaminates are present.

Phase II is referred to as the confirmation phase. In this

phase, a comprehensive survey is conducted to define the problem

fully through environmental sampling and analyses and survey

data from all technical areas are interpreted and interrelated.

Phase III is referred to as technology base development. In

this phase, control technology is matched with specific contamination

problems at a given site to determine the most economical solution.

If control technologies do not exist, they are developed in this

phase.

Phase IV. the final phase of the IR program, is the operations
phase. This phase includes design, construction, and operation
of pollution abatement facilities, and the completion of remedial
actions.

Response to Imminent Hazards
The comprehensive IR process outlined here would be expedited in
the event that an imminent hazard to health, welfare, or the
environment were found.

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Redstone Arsenal
LOCATION: Huntsville, Alabama

I.D.: AL 213820742

MISSION: Headquarters Army Missile Command, Troop training
on missiles, ordinance development and training,
chemical warfare storage and training and missile
test ranges.

AREA: 8,650 acres
POPULATION: 25,000
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance. Present permit is current.

RCRA: Part A submitted. State inspected

May 4 & 5, 1983. Found them to be out of
compliance. Part B has been requested.

CERCLA: Notified; and has completed Phase I of the
IRP, now in Phase II of IRP.

TOXICS: Organics, inorganics, solvents, pesticides,
heavy metals, acids, bases, PCB.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: The AEHA surveyed the facility in September 1982

and a Water Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)
was conducted by the state on August 24-25, 1983.
Many 0 & M deficiencies were identified but
sufficient items have been corrected to bring
the facility into compliance. Sewage Treatment
Plant #4 has been reworked and its efficiency
and BOD removal has been improved. A $350,000
I&I program project to correct the infiltration
problem has been completed but the infiltration
problem has not been completely corrected.
Additional studies are needed to determine the
source of the uncontrolled infiltration. There
are no provisions being made to reduce the fecal-
coliform count as the state does not require
chlorination. The bypass pumps have been rewired
which corrects the previous problem of overload
kickout.

-------
Page 2

Redstone Arnsenal

The contract for a coalescent plate oil/water
separator has been completed; however, the
separator did not work properly during cold
weather because of lack of heat. A building
is being constructed around the oil/water
separator and a heater will be installed to
make the system operate properly during cold
weather.

RCRA: The state cited the installation under RCRA
for not regularly inspecting the hazardous
waste storage areas. The hazardous waste
materials were produced by a mission contrac-
tor on base, and are under the jurisdiction
of Redstone Arsenal. A RCRA inspection
program was started in June 83 and a hazardous
waste storage area has been designated. The
inspection program will continue on a regular
basis. A permitted hazardous storage area is
scheduled for the FY '85 abatement program.

CERCLA: The facility is presently completing Phase II

of the IRP program. They are in the process of
preparing groundwater assessment plans to be
presented to the state. The plans have been
held up until results have been obtained from
four new wells requested by the state. Two of
the four came in dry and two additional wells
will have to be dug.

ACTION

The Calgon Unit on the DDT ditch has been dis-
continued. The valve on the lowermost dam on
the ditch has been repaired. The state re-
quested that the DDT waste soils landfill be
regraded or recontoured and that well RS016 be
plugged and pulled. A request was submitted to
have this work done but funds have not yet been
received to go ahead with the project.

Check on actions for water and RCRA to attain
compliance.

CONTACT: Bill Schroder (205) 876-6122

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:	USA Fort Rucker Aviation Training Center

LOCATION:	Fort Rucker, Alabama

I.D.:	AL 213720776

MISSION:	Army aviation training and education facility.

AREA:	57,855 acres on base, 2932 off, 3114 leased.

POPULATION:	19,040

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection.

WATER: Out of compliance, NPDES is current. The facility
was inspected by the State on November 16, 1983
and violations of the permit were noted in a
letter dated November 23, 1983. Corrections are
being made and the facility is expected to be in
compliance by September 1, 1984.

RCRA: Part A submitted. Inspection made by State on

June 30, 1983. Was out of compliance administra-
tively.

CERCLA: Has completed Phase I. Phase II is essentially

complete. Six wells were dug around the sanitary
landfill which are continually monitored. No
special problems with contaminants to date.

TOXICS: Solvents, inorganics, heavy metals, damaged
ordinance, paint stripping, acids.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: There is a continuing problem with the sewage

treatment plant meeting the fecal coliform, BOD,
oil and grease limits. The chlorinators being
used were of the old type which do not inject in
proportion to the flow. An engineering survey
was made and a flow proportional chlorinator was
obtained. Other problems were identified which
need improvement. The facility was inspected by
the State on November 16, 1983, and deficiencies
were noted in sampling and analysis procedures,
equipment calibration, maintenance and record
keeping; washracks were discharged to storm

-------
Page 2.

USA Fort Rucker Aviation Training Center

sewers; also, the facility failed to comply with
certain items of permit # AL 0002178 dealing with
the installation of pollution control equipment and
evaluating discharges to groundwaters; there was
hydraulic overload of washracks from rainfall,
diversion valves needed inspection repair and con-
trol, and the facility failed to advise the State
and EPA as to the status of completion of the com-
pliance schedule items in Part 1 (B) of the NPDES
permit. All items, including some not covered
herein should be handled in accordance with pro-
cedures outlined in the letter of November 23, 1983.
Estimated compliance date is September 1, 1984.

RCRA: The facility was cited for administrative problems.
The problems related to the facility management
not following RCRA regulations. Presently, this
condition is being corrected. All toxics (PCB's)
or other hazardous wastes presently in storage
will be shipped to Emelle, Alabama or otherwise
disposed of in accordance with the regulations by
April 1, 1984.

ACTION

Track Phase II of IRP, check out RCRA management
team for actions under ISS compliance. Make
necessary improvements in the wastewater treatment
system to assure compliance with NPDES permit,
including infiltration problems.

CONTACT: Henry Dowling (205) 255-2541

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:
LOCATION:
I.D. :
MISSION;

AREA:

POPULATION:
COMPLIANCE

USA Fort McClellan
: Anniston, Alabama
: AL213720562

: Headquarters of U.S. Military Police and
Chemical Schools, plus Army Basic Training.

: 19,000 acres main base, 10,000 housing,
18,000 leased acres.

17,000 military, 3,000 civilians.

STATUS

NOTE: Winner of DOD Environmental Award for 1982.

AIR: in compliance by inspection.

WATER: In compliance. Treatment plant is operated
by the City of Anniston but owned by the
Army. Permit is issued to the City of
Anniston.

RCRA: State has not done an inspection. Facility
has submitted Part A.

CERCLA: Notified and ccpmpleted Phase I of IRP, phase

11	scheduled for '85.

TOXICS: Generates toxics - PCB's, TCE, other stored
toxics - solvents, paints, paint thinner,
dry cleaning fluid.

EROBLSM AREAS

No immediate problem areas. Phase ii should
be started as soon as possible. There are

12	sites in which chemical warfare gases
have been buried in the past. This may not
be considered an immediate problem because
such chemicals would have dissipated over a
period of time.

Fort McClellan will be the training center
for Chemical warfare School and a facility
is under construction for a specially
designed training facility. A Part B was
submitted, but wastes presently generated
by the school have been determined not to

-------
Page 2

USA Fort McClellan

be hazardous and will probably not require
a Part B permit at this time. A rejevalua-
tion will be done when the facility is on
line. The disposal system was designed to
meet RCRA requirements.

ACTION

Phase II of the IRP should be started
earlier, check on PCB management storage
and disposal, follow the development of
chemical agent training facility.

CONTACT:

Ray Clark -

(205) 238-3019

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

FACILITY: Anniston Army Depot
LOCATION: Anniston, Alabama
I.D.: AL 213820027

MISSION: Major industrial rework facility for

armored vehicles (tanks) and small arms
and is a general supply and maintenance
depot for various commodities including
chemical warfare agents.

SI2E: 15,200 acres

POPULATION:

4900 civilian employees and 35 military
personnel.

WASTEWATER:

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by source test. However,

present controls are expected to fail and
ANAD is under a court order to consider
semiannual air emission tests for partic-
ulates on 2 boilers. A construction
project is underway to modify stack
emissions by installing a bag pollution
control system.

Out of compliance; NPDES permit expired
June 10, 1982, and has not been reissued
by the state. Meetings were held with
the State in March and April of 1984,
to fix monitoring points, to determine
new permit parameters, and decide on a
plan of action . The State is in the
process of developing a new permit.

Interim Status - Out of compliance due to
administrative requirements. Interim
inspection - May 20, 1983. Part A is on
file. Part B has not yet been requested.

CERCLA* Notified - Phase I and II have been com-
pleted. Phase IV is underway. Ground-
water investigations are essentially
complete and a report is due in March
1984.

RCRAj

TOXICS:

Chemical warfare agents stored.

-------
Page 2

Anniston Army Depot

PROBLEM AREAS

AIR: ANAD is under a court order to consider semi-
annual air emissions test for particulates
on 2 of 5 boilers in Bldg. 401. Although
the system is presently in compliance, the
present controls are expected to fail. New
technology will be used (Hopper evacuation)
to control future emissions. Construction
was started in August of 1983 and should be
completed in FY '84.

WASTEWATER: Construction of a $7.0 million domestic and
industrial WWTP started in April 1980 and is
basically complete. However, the effluent
produced does not meet permit parameters for
Cd, Cr, and TSS. The designer Roy F. Wesson,
Inc., was retained to conduct a 60 day plant
and personnel evaluation during August 1983.
FFCA called for compliance by February 1982.
This was extended to July 1983 by the State.
ANAD has requested an extension to
January 1984 with a committment to a plan
of action for future construction. Founda-
tion dewatering at the Metal Finishing
Facility (400,000 gpd max) requires treat-
ment for chrome and TCE. A new permit is
needed. The NPDES Permit expired on
June 30, 1982. A draft proposed permit
was formulated in June 1982 but has not
been issued by the State. A meeting was
held at the AAD with the State on
February 14, 1984. The State insisted on
inplant monitoring and compliance with
permit requirements at the industrial
plant effluent outlet rather than after
the combined sanitary and industrial
outfall. Permit requirements were exceeded
for TSS in July, August, and October of
1983, for chrome in October, November and
December of 1983 and for cadmium in
October, November, and December of 1983
and for Cd, Ni, and Tss in January of 1984.

-------
Page 3

Anniston Army Depot

A new meeting was held with the State on
April 18, 1984, to establish monitoring
requirements, permit parameters and a plan
of action. No definite decision was
reached with the State. Facility personnel
claim they cannot meet the draft permit
requirements presented by the State because
the plant was designed to meet less
stringent permit parameters previously
agree to by the State and EPA. The
facility is planning improvements including
additional circulation and aeration, but
do not believe these improvements will
enable the system to meet the draft
requirements proposed by the State.

Additional construction will probably be
needed.

CERCLA: Investigation of 4 disposal sites, industrial
sludge pit (Z-l), sanitary landfill (Z-2),
inactive explosives leaching beds (Z-3, and
abrasive dust landfill (Z-6), revealed local
groundwater contaminates existed at sites
(Z—1) and (Z—3), Site (Z—1) contained various
forms of halogenated hydrocarbons, solvents,
metal hydroxide sludges and lubricants.
Methylene chloride and trichloroethylene
were in high concentrations. Site (Z-3)
leaching beds contained explosive washout
wastewater compounds such as TNT, RDX and
HMX; and these were found locally in medium
concentrations. A groundwater assessment
study recommended excavation of 37,000 cubic
yards of contaminated material from the (Z-l)
site. The Army elected to truck this
material to the Alabama Chemical Waste
Management site. This was completed in
February 1983 and only requires final
certification from the state. The ground-
water studies identified other possible
problems in the industrial area in addition
to those at the metal finishing facility.
There is a possible offsite contamination
which is under investigation. Site vists
will be necessary twice a year to keep
informed on actions taken by ANAD.

-------
Page 4

Anniston Army Depot

ACTION

Water pollution and air pollution problems
need resolution. Also, water monitoring
points and permit parameters need resolution;
air inspection will be needed when the hopper
evacuation project has been completed; NPDES
compliance inspection when the system is
fully operational. Keep informed about
CERCLA project development. Check on PCB
storage and disposal plans by DLA. Track
the development of the RCRA Part B permit
and compliance with permit provisions.

CONTACT:

R. M. Grant - (205) 235-6155

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:
LOCATION:
I .D. :
MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

Maxwell Air Force Base
Montgomery, Alabama
AL 570024182

High level officer training including
Air War College.

3,783 Acres

6,738

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:
WATER:

WASTEWATER:

RCRAs

In compliance by certification with regulation.

In compliance. The facility receives its water
from the City of Montgomery system.

In compliance. Sanitary wastewater is dis-
charged to the City of Montgomery Sewage System.
Industrial point source discharges covered under
NPDES permit AL-0003727 were not consistently
meeting standards. There were violations for
BOD, TSS, oil and grease for August and September
of 1983.

In compliance. Only small quantities of hazardous
wastes handled. Not classified as treat, storage
and disposal (TSD). All wastes are transported
off-base for disposal.

Phase I (preliminary assessment) showed 11 sites
needed investigation. The facility is presently
in Phase I of the program. The Phase II report
will show whether remedial action is necessary.

TOXICS: None identified.

PROBLEM AREAS

Correction of miscellaneous industrial discharges.

ACTION

Follow up on Phase II of IRP program.

Contact: Ralf Sanford - (205) 293-6908

CERCLA:

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Gunter Air Force Station
LOCATION: Montgomery, Alabama
I.D.: AL 570024185

MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

Part of Air University Command, design and
test computer systems for Air Force, and
train personnel.

367 Acres

2,820

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:
WATER:

WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

In compliance by certification with regulation.

In compliance. Water is obtained from City of
Montgomery system.

In compliance. Sanitary wastewater is tied
into the City of Montgomery system. However,
NPDES standards were not consistently being
met for industrial point source discharges
covered under NPDES permit AL0003719.

Violations for oil and grease were reported
for July and August of 1983.

In compliance. Only small quantities of
hazardous wastes are handled. Not classified
as TSD facilities. All wastes are shipped
off-base for disposal.

Notified. Phase I of IRP showed no sites which
needed investigation.

TOXICS: Some toxics handled, but no problems identified.
PROBLEM AREAS

Correction of miscellaneous industrial discharges

ACTION

None required,

Contact: Ralf Sanford - (205) 293-6900

-------
DATE: June 30, 1984

NAME: NASA G.C. Marshall Space Center
LOCATION: Huntsville, Alabama
AL 800013863

I .D. :
MISSION:

Space Research and Technology, Rocket
Development

AREA: 1,840 Acres
POPULATION: 3,000 Civilians, 1,000 Contractors
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: No significant discharge. In compliance.

WATER: In compliance, NPDES permit expired September
1981, and the State has not renewed the NPDES
permit for the industrial discharge. Domestic
wastes are managed by the Redstone Arsenal STP.

RCRA: Part A submitted; a revised part A will soon be
submitted to reflect changes. The State
inspected the facility in March 1983, and
found the facility in compliance with the
Interim Status Standards requirements.

CERCLA: Notified; not in a phased program. Monitoring
test wells have been installed around the
industrial waste lagoon which is the only
site of concern. To date monitoring has been
negative.

TOXICS: Solvents, de-greasers, heavy metals, cyanide.

PROBLEM AREAS

The State needs to issue new NPDES permit for
the new industrial treatment plant and
polishing lagoon. The old industrial lagoon
is now used for polishing. A flow-through
Bioassay was requested of EPA by the state.

This Bioassay was conducted in October 1983
along with a performance evaluation inspection.
The results will be used to write the new
NPDES permit.

ACTlOfo

Follow-up on 1980 PCB study. Check on NPDES
compliance and CERCLA monitoring.

CONTACT:

Larry Caddy - FTS/872-2763

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Fabius Preparation Plant
LOCATION: Jackson County, Fabius, Alabama
ID: AL 640090001

MISSION:

SIZE:
POPULATION:

Coal mining and coal preparation including
coal washing.

1,500 acres; washing plant 228 acres
2 (facility shut down)

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In Compliance.

WATER: Out of compliance because of low pH in runoff
from impoundments during heavy rainfall
events, but insufficient data is presently
available to define the facility as being
significantly out of compliance in accordance
with definition of "significant noncompliance"
referred to in Section 123.45(a) of the
Revised NPDES Regulations. TVA discontinued
the operation of the facility on
October 1, 1982. Present plans indicate the
facility may be transferred under a lease
agreement to another firm and operated under
a new permit with the same parameters.

RCRA: Part A was submitted but withdrawn.

CERCLA: No sites identified.

TOXICS: Sulfur, iron and manganese in wash water and
runoff water.

PROBLEM AREAS

If the facility is again placed in use, a new
wastewater treatment facility would be required
to meet the NPDES permit requirements. TVA
has no plans for building such a system; this
would be the responsibility of the new
operator. According to the TVA Environmental
Quality Section, runoff from the existing 228
acre tract would be taken care of by a
reclamation plan. If the tract is not leased
it will be TVA1s responsibility to reclaim
the area.

ACTION NEEDED

Follow-up on lease agreement.
Contact: Mike Hines - (205) 386-2971

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: TVA National Fertilizer Development Center
Muscle Shoals

LOCATION: Muscle Shoals, Alabama

I.D.: AL 640032093

MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

Development of the technology of fertilizer
production.

300 Acres

1,000 people

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:

WATER:

WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:
TOXICS:

In compliance by inspection with regulation.
The facility has been inspected by the State.

In compliance. The facility gets its raw
water from Wilson Lake with the intake located
in Fleet Hollow. Although PCB's have been
discovered at the adjacent Muscle Shoals Wilson
Power Service Center former disposal site, this
material has not been detected in the water
supply in dangerous amounts.

In compliance. The main wastewater treatment
system consists of an extended aeration pack-
age plant. Also, there are several point
source discharges which are permitted. A study
is underway to determine whether coal pile run-
off is between pH 6 and 9. If the effluent
exceeds these limits, corrective measures will
be taken to bring the pH into the proper range.

Part A has been filed. Part B has not yet been
called. The facility is in compliance with
interim status regulations. The facility has
a hazardous waste temporary storage facility.

Notification has been filed. The facility is
in Phase I of the program.

Acids and other toxics are handled at the
facility, but no special problems have been
identified.

-------
Page 2

TVA NFDC Muscle Shoals

PROBLEM AREAS

There is a possibility of coal pile runoff
not meeting the pH range from 6 to 9.

ACTION

Follow up on coal pile runoff.

Contact: Mike Hines - (205) 386-2971

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: TVA Muscle Shoals Wilson Power Service Center

LOCATION: Muscle Shoals, Alabama
I.D.: AL 640006746

MISSION:

Build and repair support equipment, transformers,
motors, etc. Handling and storage of electrical
equipment.

AREA: 80 Acres

POPULATION: 300

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. The Muscle Shoals Wilson Power
Service Center receives its water from the TVA
National Fertilizer Development Center which
obtains its water from an intake on Fleet
Hollow, an embayment on Wilson Lake. It was
feared that PCB's discovered in the landfill
disposal site behind the Wilson Power Service
Center would contaminate both the City of
Muscle Shoals and TVA water supplies which both
draw water from Fleet Hollow. A program
consisting of encapsulating the disposal site
with clay and protecting it from erosion has
been successful and PCB's in dangerous amounts
have not been detected in the water supplies to
date.

WASTEWATER: The system does not meet accepted standards
with regard to oil discharges at a point
source presently not permitted. A system is
being planned to collect and/or treat the
discharge to meet the required standards.

Money has been budgeted for FY'84. The
secondary wastewater system consists of a
septic tank and a buried sand filter.

RCRA: The facility is in compliance with interim

status regulations. Part A has been submitted.
Part B has not yet been called. In 1981, PCB's
were discovered in hazardous amounts in a
former landfill disposal site behind the Muscle
Shoals Power Service Center. A meeting was held

-------
Page 2

TVA Muscle Shoals Wilson Power Service Center

by the State, TVA and EPA representatives on
September 3, 1982, and a plan of action was
developed to control and contain the PCB's.

Areas where capacitors and containers were
known to be buried were excavated and the
materials were removed and disposed of in
accordance with RCRA regulations. PCB's were
contained in the main disposal site (X-25 yard)
by installing a culvert in the main drainageway,
regrading the area, and encapsulating it with
clay and then fertilizing and seeding the
area to prevent erosion. The area has been
continually monitored and no PCB's in dangerous
amounts have been found leaving the area or
in the water supply.

CERCLA: Notification was filed. The system is in

Phase II of the CERCLA program. "Several sites
were identified and several capacitors and
containers have been excavated and disposed of.
The status of groundwater contamination will
be made known when the Phase II report is
made, but it is expected to be negative
because of the heavy clay layers protecting
groundwater supplies.

TOXICS: PCB's handled and disposed of as indicated.

PROBLEM AREAS

Possible deterioration of PCB containers with
potential for future contamination of surface
or groundwater supplies.

ACTION

The present precautionary measures should be
adequate.

Contact: Mike Hines - (205) 386-2971

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Jacksonville Naval Air Station
LOCATION: Jacksonville, Florida
I.D.: FL170024412

MISSION: The Jacksonville NAS is a major operating
base for patrol aircraft and has a large
industrial complex with a naval air rework
facility for the repair and overhaul of air
frames and engines of naval aircraft. A
large technical training center is also
located at the base.

AREA: 3346 acres

POPULATION: 16,495

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

Out of compliance. The base has facilities foi
treating both domestic and industrial wastes
and a combined treating facility. The
treatment system is not consistently meeting
State and NPDES requirements for cyanide
heavy metals, TSS, oil and grease. Plans are
presently underway to correct pretreatment
and capacity requirements so that State and
NPDES permit requirements can be met. It is
estimated that construction will be complete
and the system will be in compliance by
January 1986.

The base does not presently meet established
standards. The base is under interim status
and they have filed a temporary operating
permit with the State of Florida. The facility
has been inspected by the State and some
violations were noted. Part A is on file but
this has been superseded by the Florida
permit. A covered storage area is planned
for FY'86 for handling solvents, fuel sludge,
degreasers, cleaners, used paints, thinners
and other hazardous materials to assure
compliance with RCRA storage criteria.

Notification has been filed. Initial assess-
ment studies (Phase I) have been completed.
Sampling and monitoring has begun on 11 sites
identified by the IAS study team as needing

-------
Page 2

Jacksonville Naval Air Station

further investigation. The results of the
confirmation study will be used to evaluate
the necessity of conducting mitigative
actions or cleanup operations. Two cleanup
actions have been completed by a contract
totaling $300,000. One involved construc-
tion of shallow trenches to intercept and
treat leacheate from an abandoned solvent
and petroleum wastepit. The other involved
removal and disposal of approximately 300
drums of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) con-
taminated soil from an area formerly used
to store transformers. A permit and certif-
ication is needed from the state to back-
pump test wells. The Navy has been accused
of depositing hazardous wastes in the Hipps
Road landfill. To date the Navy has no re-
cord of using this site.

Silvex - The Navy used this contractor to
dispose of their paint waste and solvent by
beneficiation burning. Silvex is now re-
quired to clean up the site and the State
may sue the Navy as a party in the cleanup.

TOXICS: The base handles and stores PCB's and other
toxic wastes prior to disposal.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: improvements are needed at the facility for
pretreating cyanide heavy metals, oil and
grease. The pretreatment of heavy metals
is inadequate which causes overloading
of the main treatment system. A new
electro-plating facility is presently being
constructed which should improve heavy metal
removal. Estimated Completion date for this
facility is April 1985. Also, oil and grease
from the naval rework industrial area and
the helicopter parking apron enters the storm
drains and violates water quality standards
in the St. Johns River. Design of an oil
separator unit was started in April 1984.
Construction of this unit is expected to
start in May 1985 and be completed in
December of 1985.

-------
Page 3

Jacksonville Naval Air Station

CERCLA: A superfund site has been identified and the
resulting conditions are being corrected.
The necessary corrective action involved
the removal of 300 drums of PCB contaminated
soil from a transformer storage area and
the construction of trenches to intercept
and treat leacheate from an abandoned
solvent and petroleum waste pit. Eleven
sites are presently being studied to deter-
mine the extent of mitigative or cleanup
actions required.

ACTION NEEDED

Heavy metal removals at the industrial waste-
water pretreatment system must be improved,
also, TSS at the main plant together with
flow recording and sampling devices.

Additional funding must be obtained and a
project implemented to correct the conditions
indicated. The facility has been proposed for
NPL hazardous ranking under CERCLA.

CONTACT: Bill Roche - FTS/947-2717

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Pensacola Naval Air Station & Public
Works Center

LOCATION: Pensacola, Florida

I.D.: FL170024610, FL170024567

MISSION: Major overhaul and rework facility for naval
aircraft including an industrial complex,
also facilities for pilot training. The base
contains administrative offices, housing
units, maintenance shops, and the essential
services for carrying out the mission.

AREA: 13,174 acres

POPULATION: 22,974
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.

WATER: Out of compliance. The plant is not complying
with Section 17-6.01(1) FAC requiring 90% or
better removal of suspended solids. Also,
heavy metal removals are not consistently
within State and/or NPDES requirements (pri-
marily Cr, Cd, and Cu). It is planned to
correct this condition by applying up to 1.5
mgd of treated wastes to the golf course by
spray irrigation. Also, the addition of the
new monitoring system, a flow meter for
industrial wastes, new sludge handling facil-
ities, and adjustment of the weirs on the
primary settling tanks should improve effi-
ciency. It is planned that the spray irriga-
tion system will be completed during the 3rd
quarter of FY'84.

RCRA: The PNAS generates, transports, treats,

stores, and disposes of hazardous wastes.
The facility has been inspected by the State
of Florida. Part A is on file. The base is
on an interim status with the State of Florida.
A temporary operating permit has been filed
with the State A 2,400 s.f. RCRA covered
storage area is planned for FY'84 and an 800
s.f. storage area is planned for FY'85 to
handle hazardous wastes. Materials handled
include paint, thinners, cleaners, pesticides,

-------
Page 2

Pensacola Naval Air Station & Public Works Center

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. The initial
assessment study, Phase I has been accom-
plished. A confirmation study is recommended
for seven potentially contaminated sites iden-
tified during the IAS. The confirmation
studies started during the first quarter of
FY'84. Sites identified are: Site 1 -
Sanitary Landfill; Site 2 - North Chevalier
Field Disposal Site; Site 17 - Transformer
Storage Yard; Site 21 Sludge Disposal at Fuel
Tank area; Site 22 Refueler Repair Ship Fuel
Disposal Site; Site 27 - Radium Dial Shop
Sanitary Sewer; and, Site 29 - Soil South of
Building 3460. Additional sites were added
after consultation with the state. A ground-
water monitoring program is in effect.

TOXICS: PCB's are stored prior to disposal. Any

toxics found in the Confirmation Studies will
be handled in accordance with RCRA and TSCA
Regulations.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: The water treatment system is not consistently
meeting State and NPDES heavy metal and
suspended solids removal requirements. Also,
the main wastewater treatment system is not
meeting the Florida requirement of 90 percent
or better removal of SS. It is planned to
correct this deficiency in the system by
applying up to 1.5 mgd of treated wastes on
the golf course by spray irrigation. This
will reduce the total poundage of SS in the
effluent. Violations were noted on occasion
for Cr, Cu, and Cd. The spray irrigation
system should improve their removal. Also,
adjustment of the weirs on the primary clari-
fier should improve efficiency. Problems have
been experienced in getting the contractor to
properly finish the contract. Completion is
scheduled for 3rd quarter of FY'84.

CERCLA: The Navy has been identified as a contributor
to materials deposited in a private landfill
at the Pioneer sand Company Landfill. Studies
are presently pending to determine whether the
wastes have contaminated the surrounding soils
and groundwater.

-------
Page 3

Pensacola Naval Air Station &

Public Works Center

ACTION

Participate in the Pioneer Sands mitigation.
Check on PCB disposal after January 1984.
Follow-up on water corrective actions. Call
RCRA Part B as soon as possible.

CONTACT:

Andy Leon -

FTS/948-2321

-------
DATE: June 30, 1984

NAME: U.S. Naval Air Station, Cecil Field
LOCATION: Duval County, Jacksonville, Florida
I.D.: FL170022474

MISSION: The base contains a master jet station which
serves to provide support for attack aircraft
of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet. It is the home
of Commander, Fleet Air Detachment Cecil
Field; Commander, Light Attack Wing One; one
Carrier Air Wing; twelve attack squadrons;
and a composite squadron detachment which
deploy to Sixth Fleet Carriers. The station
provides two training squadrons and a flight
physiological training center. The aircraft
intermediate maintenance department provides
complete overhaul facilities for jet engines.
The base contains a larger jet fuel and oil
tank storage area.

AREA!

19,564 acres

POPULATION: 9,359
COMPLIANCE' StATDS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. The expanded wastewater treat-
ment system is scheduled for completion in
FY'84. Some problems with oil in primary
clarifiers and flow exceeding design capacity.
No recent record of noncompliance is in our
files. An August 25, 1982 inspection of the
facility indicated that some improvement
could be made in checking flow recorded read-
ings and in taking samples. An oil/water
separator is to be installed to intercept oil
and grease from aircraft washrack and hanger
860 (FY184). Presently connected to sanitary
sewer system, this project will reduce oil
and grease received by the primary clarifiers
at the waste treatment facility. The effluent
outfall of the treatment system may have to
be modified because the state will not allow
any increase in the BOD discharged to Yellow
Creek.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has been inspectec
by the state. A temporary operating permit

-------
Page 2

U.S. Naval Air Station, Cecil Field

was filed with the state. The permit has been
challenged; a hearing is pending. A construc-
tion permit has been received from the state to
construct a new storage building in FY'84 to
store waste products from cleaning operations
in compliance with 40 CFR Part 761/ Annex III,
Paragraph 761.42. Construction has started and
the facility should be ready by 1st quarter of
FY'85.

CERCLA: Filed notification. The initial assessment
(Phase I) has been completed; Phase II was
scheduled to start March 1984.

TOXICS: PCB's are handled and stored prior to disposal.

PROBLEM AREAS

RCRA: When the temporary RCRA operating permit was
advertised it was challenged by a citizens
group which petitioned for a hearing. Contact
with the state indicated that the problem could
be worked out.

WASTEWATER:

The discharge point for the new wastewater
treatment system may need modification. The
state will not allow any increase in BOD into
Yellow Creek, the intended discharge point for
treated effluent from the new plant. Part of
the effluent may have to be spray irrigated or
pumped to a different waterway for discharge.

ACTION

Completion of wastewater treatment systems
scheduled for FY'84. Check PCB storage and
disposal.

CONTACT: Ed Dalducci - (904) 778-5620

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: U.S. Naval Training Center

LOCATION: Orlando, Florida

I.D.: FL170024736

MISSION: The base is used as a Naval Recruit Training
Center. The base consists of the Navy Annex
(McCoy), a training center, a warehouse annex
and the Herndon Annex at the airport.

AREA: 2,060 acres

POPULATION: 15,213

COMPLIANCE' StAtOS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. The present system (McCoy) gets
good BOD and SS removals and meets present
NPDES permit and state requirements, but would
not be able to meet future requirements for
Boggy Creek discharges upon expiration of the
present permit. The facility is presently ne-
gotiating with the city of Orlando with regard
to a contract for the disposal of Navy waste-
water. The current NPDES permit, which calls
for discharge by land application, or other
method of effluent disposal that will cease
discharge to surface water by February 1, 1985,
has been extended by FDER from February 1
of 1985 to February 1 of 1986 to give the Navy
time to complete negotiations and complete a
tie into the Orlando system. A revision needs
to be made to the NPDES permit to conform to
the change made by the FDER. The Naval Training
Center, Herndon Annex and Warehouse Area C are
presently tied into the Regional System.

RCRA: Small quantity generator.

CERCLA: The installation is not currently part of the

formal installation restoration program, but is
under evaluation for possible later inclusion.

TOXICS: A small quantity of PCB's are handled. PCB

equipment is in service. A new RCRA handling
and storage facility has been built.

-------
Page 2

U.S. Naval Training Center

PROBLEM AREAS

The Navy is presently negotiating with the
City of Orlando with regard to a contract for
the disposal of Navy wastewater. Spray irriga-
tion has been considered as an option.

ACTION NEEDED

Resolve wastewater treatment issue.

CONTACT: Frank Labozynski - FTS/848-4778

-------
DATE: June 30, 1984

NAME: Naval Air Station and Annex
Key West, Florida

I.D.: FL170024733

The complex consists of the following facilities:

Name

Boca Chica

Sigsbee Park Housing
Truman Annex
Trumbo Point
Naval Medical Clinic
Poinciana Housing
Demolition Key

AREA:
POPULATION:
MISSION:

5,524.9 acres
6,944

Area in Acres

4760
351
232
121
1.5
35.4
24

6944

Population

1000
3100
1136
940
18
750
0

The mission of the Key West Naval Air Station
is to maintain and operate facilities and
provide services and material to support
operations of naval aviation activities and
units of the operating forces of the Navy and
other activities as designated by CNO.

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.
However, a complaint was received from an
adjacent land owner during the summer of 1983
regarding excessive smoke from the Trumbo
Point facility at Fleming Key. The smoke was
apparently caused by the burning of obsolete
buildings for which the facility had a Florida
permit. The excessive smoke was caused by
the burning of wood containing creosote which
was a violation of the permit.

WATER: Out of compliance. The Poincianna Housing Area,
Truman Annex, the Trumbo Point facility and
the Regional Medical Facility have no waste-
water treatment facilities. Sewers from these
facilities tie directly into the City of Key
West mains and thence to an ocean outfall with-
out treatment. Potable water is supplied by

-------
Page 2

Naval Air Station and Annex

the "Navy" aqueduct which is now controlled
by the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority.

Water is obtained from the Biscayne aquifer
with wells at Florida City. The base has the
following sanitary, facilities:

Wastewater Treatment:

Naval Air Station, Boca Chica

This station has its own contact stabiliza-
tion wastewater treatment facility. The
system is generally in compliance but on a
few occasions it has not met NPDES and state
requirements with regard to suspended solids
removal and fecal coli count. The design flow
is sometimes exceeded due infiltration. The
fecal coli violations may be due to the use of
a fixed flow chlorinator. The chlorination
system should be revised so that it is propor-
tional to flow. This plant should also be
equipped with an alarm system for power
failure. A letter indicates that the neces-
sary revisions will be completed in FY'84.
It is probable that the Boca Chica sewer
lines should be protected from infiltration
by having them sliplined the same as is
presently being done at the Sigsbee Park
Housing Area, although infiltration problems
are not as severe at
this facility.

Inspection by the state on August 19, 1983
found the wastewater treatment plant out of
compliance with regard to TSS. It was also
noted that there was no alarm system for
power or equipment failures, no continuous
flow measurement was being maintained and
there was a question as to whether the plant
would be under a state certified operator.

Siasbee Park Housing Area

This facility has its own contact stabiliza-
tion wastewater treatment facility. The
system is generally in compliance but on a

-------
Page 3

Naval Air Station and Annex

few occasions it has not met NPDES and state
requirements with regard to suspended solids
removal and fecal coli count. Design flow is
sometimes exceeded due to infiltration prob-
lems. The fecal coli violations may be due
to the use of a fixed flow chlorinator. The
chlorination system should be revised so that
it is proportional to flow. This plant should
also be equipped with an alarm system for
power failure. A proportional flow chlorinator
and an alarm system are planned for FY'84.
The Sigsbee Park Housing Area sewers are pres-
ently being sliplined to correct the infiltra-
tion problem.

A letter was received from the state on
August 29, 1983 following an inspection on
August 19, 1983. The system was out of
compliance with regard to BOD and TSS and
other deficiencies were noted as follows:

There was no alarm system for power or
equipment failure, no continuous flow measure-
ment, plant is hydraulically overloaded and
there was a question as to whether the plant
operation will be under a state certified
operator. A compliance schedule was requested
within 30 days by the state.

Truman Annex

This facility has a sewage collection system
which ties into the city system and thense to
an ocean outfall without treatment. The
system is in violation of state and federal
standards.

Trumbo Point

This facility has a sewage collection system
which ties into the city system and thence to
an ocean outfall without treatment. The
system is in violation of state and federal
standards.

Demolition Key

The area has no sanitary wastewater treatment
system or sewers.

-------
Page 4

Naval Air Station and Annex

Poincianna Housing Area

This facility has a sewage collection system
which ties into the city system and thence
to an ocean outfall without treatment. The
system is in violation of state and federal
standards.

Naval Medical Clinic

This facility has a sewage collection system
which ties into the city system and thence
to an ocean outfall without treatment. The
system is in violation of state and federal
standards.

Proposed Systems

A three million dollar project was budgeted
by the Navy for FY'86 to pay for the Navy
portion of a proposed collection and waste-
water treatment system to take care of
wastewater at Key West. Because of the high
cost per capita, the system was never approved
by local authorities. This system would
collect and treat wastewater from the City of
Key West, Truman Annex, Trumbo Point, the
Poincianna Housing Area and the Naval Medical
Clinic which are presently not treated.
However, the completionof the system in the
near future seems questionable because of
economic problems. A ship to shore collec-
tion system was' proposed at the Trumbo Point
area which would tie into the city system.
However, in a letter dated September 7, 1983,
the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation refused to approve the tie into
the city system on the grounds that it would
violate the provisions of 17-4 of the Florida
administrative code. The City of Key West
has no wastewater treatment system and pres-
ently discharges direct to an ocean outfall
without treatment. The Naval Facilities
Engineering Command at Charleston, S.C.
requests that EPA resolve this issue. The
matter is currently under legal review by the
State of Florida and EPA. A similar ship to
shore sewer to the city system is also being
considered for Truman Annex.

-------
Page 5

Naval Air Station and Annex

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has been inspected
by the state and does not presently meet RCRA
requirements.

Boca Chica

The facility is presently deficient with regard
to storage space for hazardous materials. A
project has been planned to provide 3500 sf
of covered storage space for hazardous wastes
It is expected to be completed by FY 1985.
The project is presently in the design stage
(3-12-84) and a permit is being prepared. A
public hearing was held on 11-16-83 and no
serious objections were received. Pending
issuance of the permit, application for a
construction permit will be filed in June
1984, bids will be obtained and construction
will proceed. Items to be handled at this
facility include used solvents, used paints,
thinners, and other DOD chemicals. The
project is required to assure compliance with
RCRA storage cirteria 49 CFR 264/265.

Poincianna Housing Area

This site has no known hazardous waste problems
or facilities.

Truman Annex

The site has no known hazardous waste problems
or facilities.

Trumbo Point

The facility has a hazardous waste tank. The
tank is no longer used and a closure plan has
been filed.

Naval Medical Clinic

The site has no hazardous waste facilities.

Some potentially hazardous waste materials
are handled but not in large enough quantities
to qualify as hazardous waste.

Demolition Key

This is a munitions demolition area which
contains hazardous wastes. A permit has been
filed.

-------
Page 6

Naval Air Station and Annex

CERCLA: The CERCLA program for the Naval Air Station
complex at Key West (Installation Assessment)
Phase I will start in May '84. A comprehen-
sive survey will be conducted if Phase I
investigation indicates it is necessary.

PROBLEM AREAS

AIR:

WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

ACTION NEEDED

The issue as to whether the Navy should build
its own wastewater treatment facilities or
wait for the city to plan and help finance a
regional system should be resolved. Operation
of the Boca Chica and Sigsbee Park Housing
systems need to be improved and the Truman
Annex, Trumbo Plant, Naval Medical Clinic and
Poincianna Housing Area waste need to be
treated to meet state and federal standards.

Proper storage facilities should be provided
as soon as possible.

Action needed depends upon results of Phase I
Environmental Coordinator - FTS/350-6888

There are no known problems at present.

The facilities at Truman Annex, Trumbo Point,
Poincianna Housing Area and the Naval Medical
Clinic do not meet state and federal stand-
ards with regard to wastewater discharges.
The operation of the Boca Chica and the Sigsbee
Housing Area wastewater treatment systems need
to be improved particularly with regard to
fecal coli count and suspended solids removal.
Infiltration problems need to be corrected.
Whether or not the city will build a regional
system or the navy will build its own systems
needs to be resolved.

The facilities do not presently meet RCRA
requirements.

No special problem areas have been identified.

WATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:
CONTACT:

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Mayport Naval Base
LOCATION: Duval County, Mayport, Florida
I.D.: FL170023788

MISSION: The Mayport Naval Statio
the Atlantic Fleet. Its
provide logistic support
accompanying destroyers,
of the carrier fleet.

is a carrier base for
primary mission is to
for carriers and the
tankers and other units

AREA: 2,777 acres

POPULATON: 12,84 3

COMfrLlAhCfeT STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance but some problems with oil and
grease. Sewage is treated by an extended
aeration type activated sludge plant with a
capacity of 1.9 mgd. Separate treatment is
provided for bilge. Some oil violations were
noted in the effluent from the bilge wastewater
treatment plant, also, the main plant does not
meet TSS, BOD, oil, pH and FC removals on a
consistent basis. The facility has a few minor
deficiencies in one or more areas of flow
monitoring, sampling, analyses or data calcu-
lating and reporting procedures. Examples
include infrequent calibration of flow monitor-
ing equipment, improper refrigeration of samples,
and keeping thorough records. The self monitor-
ing program is good and the problems have no
major impact on data reliability. The flow
monitoring system for the back-up chlorine
contact chamber at the time of inspection by
EPA (July 15, 1983) had been out of operation
since March 1982. The system is used only when
maintenance is being performed on the primary
unit or when an emergency situation occurs.
The outdated flow monitoring system should be
upgraded at the earliest possible date if the
system is to be utilized. This will insure
compliance with flow monitoring requirements
given in the NPDES permit when the back-up
chlorine chamber is in use.

-------
Page 2

Mayport Naval Base

RCRA: The site has been inspected by the State. Some
minor violations were noted. Part A is on file,
Part B has been issued. A Florida construction
permit for a final standard hazardous waste
storage facility has been received and construc-
tion is underway. RCRA permit requirements
are not being met. A Notice of Violation was
issued by EPA on March 9, 1984.

CERCLA: Notification filed. The initial assessment is
scheduled for FY85.

TOXICS: Not known.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: Some problems with wastewater treatment as noted.

A consultant was hired to study the problem and a
report was just recently received. The recommen-
dations of the report will be evaluated and a
plan for correcting the problems will be formu-
lated in the near future.

RCRA: Certain violations of Permit No. FL9170024260
requirements were noted in a letter dated
March 9, 1984 from the EPA Waste Compliance
Section, Residuals Management Branch as follows:

Condition I.D. 14. Compliance Schedules (pages 6
and 7) of the subject permit which specifies that
within 180 days of permit issuance the Permittee
shall submit to the Regional Administrator a
closure plan for the interim status storage
facility. The due date for the submittal of
the closure plan was January 23, 1984.

Condition I.D. 14 specifies that reports of com-
pliance or noncompliance with, or any progress
reports on, interim and final requirements con-
tained in any compliance schedule of the permit
shall be submitted no later than 14 days follow-
ing each schedule date. The due date for this
report was February 6, 1984.

The facility will comply with the N.O.V. as
requested. The required information was submit-
ted to the State and not EPA. EPA retains the
right to enforce RCRA permits issued by EPA in
delegated States.

-------
Page 3

Mayport Naval Base

ACTION NEEDED

Bilge wastewater treatment needs to be improved
for oil removal. The main wastewater treatment
facility needs to improve SS, FC, oil, pH,
and BOD removals. Either the operation must
be improved or the system must be revised.

Plans need to be formulated to correct the
conditions based on the engineering report.

RCRA permit requirements must be met.
CONTACT: Carlos Rosado - (904) 246-5531

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Patrick Air Force Base
LOCATION: Cocoa Beach, Florida

I.D.: FL 572024404

MISSION: Patrick AFB provides location, facilities
and support services for Headquarters
Eastern Space and Missile Center and
other assigned tenant units. The base
provides airfield operations, shop support,
civil engineering services, housing,
security police, transportation, hospital,
commissary, base exchange and other
services common to Air Force installations.

AREA: 21,088 acres
POPULATION: 6,500
COMPLIANCE' STANDS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance. Base has three (3) NPDES
discharge permits and all three have
expired and need to be renewed. Draft
permits have been completed but a conflict
existed over nutrient loading and distri-
bution of this loading to the Banana
River. The three permits have been
combined into one permit. The nutrient
loading problem has been resolved and a
new permit will be issued pending receipt
of a revised 401 certification.

RCRA: Part A submitted. State inspected June
1983, found to be in compliance with
interim status standards regulations
under 40 CFR 265.

CERCLA: Notified, Phase I is to be funded in FY84.

In early October 1983 oil drums were un-
covered while excavating a building
foundation. Contents were analyzed as
uncontaminated waste oils buried by the
Navy years ago. The site is being inves-
tigated for other buried material. The
Phase I Installation Restoration Program
(irp) will identify other possible burial
sites.

TOXICS:

Organics, inorganics, PCB.

-------
Page 2

Patrick Air Force Base

PROBLEM AREAS

A revised 401 certification is needed
proceed with NPDES permit issuance.

ACTION

Reissuance of NPDES permits ASAP.

CONTACT: John Anderson - (305) 494-2623

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Homestead Air Force Base
LOCATION: Dade County, Florida
I.D.: FL572124037

MISSION: Tactical Fighter Training Base for training F-4

tactical fighter combat and maintenance crews for
replacement to tactical organizations worldwide;
maintain an air alert for all south Florida; and
maintain readiness to deploy/employ tactical
fighter support on short notice. Base contains
administration and maintenance units and 1600
housing and domitory units and support services.

AREA: 3,300 acres

POPULATION: 9,288
C6MEL1ANCE'STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: Out of compliance. The Homestead Air Force Base
completed the tie-in of the Base sanitary sewer
system to the regional wastewater treatment faci-
lity of the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority
on April 11, 1983. There will be no further
discharge from the permitted facility under
NPDES Permit FL0025089. Wastewater from the
aircraft washrack is not adequately treated
prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system.
Existing oil/water separator allows high levels
of oil to enter the collection system. A
project has been planned to alter the washracks
under the FY*85 program which will meet Florida
and Dade County requirements. Readiness require-
ments for emergency response for fire trucks
make it necessary to wash this equipment within
immediate vicinity of the fire station. A
project is planned to provide the necessary
facilities to prevent pollutants from entering
groundwater and surface water in violation of
Florida statutes. The project is now under
contract and is planned to be completed in
June 1984.

Fire Training Area - The present burn pit
lining may allow seepage of petroleum products
into groundwater. The training area is being
redesigned and relocated. The new facility
will confirm to State Regulations and Dade
County code when completed. It is scheduled to
be relocated during FY'85.

-------
Page 2

Homestead Air Force Base

Housing Area - Seasonal flooding causes improper
sewer operation and unsanitary conditions in
the Base housing area. A sewer diversion project
has been designed to relieve sewer overloading.
Money was appropriated for FY'83. The project
which includes diverting water from the upper-end
of the line is approximately 95% complete.

RCRA: The site has been inspected by the state. Part A
is on file but is superseded by the Florida per-
mit. A facility is being built for storage of
solvents and will be completed in approximately
9 months. The facility has filed for a temporary
operating permit. Expect to receive temporary
operating permit in two months.

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. Initial assessment
study Phase I has been accomplished. Eight
potential sites have been identified, primarily
oil spills. A confirmation study will be done in
FY'84. The Phase II a survey will start in May.

TOXICS: No toxics in significant quantities identified.

PR06LEM AREAS

Minor problem areas are associated with facili-
ties that drain to storm water systems such as
aprons, wash down areas and the fire training
area. However, these areas are being redesigned
and rebuilt to meet standards.

ACTION

No specific action needed unless sites identified
under CERCLA become major problems.

CONTACT:

Roland Allen - (305) 257-8795 or 6142

-------
DATE :

June 30, 1984

NAME:
LOCATION:
I.D. :
MISSION:

AREA!
POPULATION:

Eglin Air Force Base
Fort Walton Beach, Florida
FL 572024366

Headquarters for Air Force Systems Command's
Armament Division. The Division's primary
mission is to develop, test and initially
acquire all nonnuclear air armament for the
Air Force's tatical and strategic forces.
This mission encompasses the entire spectrum
of activities from research technology and
development planning to initial acquisition
of armament for the Air Force inventory.

464,000 acres

22,500

COMPLIANCE' St&TDS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance because of no discharge.

Present wastewater treatment system is de-
signed to treat and spray irrigate the
effluent. No NPDES permit is required. The
state of Florida issues an operations permit.

The Main Base Plant is operating under a
temporary operating permit. The plant was
designed for 0.5 mgd but the present flow
rate averages 0.7 mgd. A new plant is pro-
gramed for FY86. All other plants including
the Plew Housing Area plant and three small
plants meet the Florida standards of 90
percent treatment before spray irrigation.

RCRA: Part A has been submitted. Part B has been
called and submitted. A Part B permit has
been issued to Eglin AFB for the construction
of a new hazardous waste storage facility to
be completed by January 1, 1985. The last
inspection by the State was made in April
1983, and only minor administrative interim
status standards problems were found. The
facility is presently under a temporary
operating permit which expires April 1, 1985.

-------
Page 2

Elgin Air Force Base

CERCLA: Notified, completed Phase I of IRP; A draft
copy of Phase II IRP document has been com-
pleted. Comments on the report have been
forwarded to the contractor. A few tech-
nical problems need resolution before for-
warding the report.

TOXICS: Solvents, paint thinners, paint sludge.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: Capacity problems at the Main Base Plant
need to be solved. This is being handled
by constructing a new plant.

RCRA: The inspection made by the State in

April 1983, cited the facility for several
administrative deficiencies of the status
standards and the present waste storage
facilities were deemed inadequate. A new
hazardous waste storage facility is being
built and the administrative problems have
been resolved.

CERCLA: Phase I of the Installation Restoration

Progra IRP) has been completed. Phase I
and Phase II studies and Phase II draft
report and preliminary findings indicate
that there is no significant areas of
concern. It recommends continued well
monitoring in several areas. A copy of
the final Phase II report will be forwarded
as soon as a few technical problems are
resolved.

The Herbicide Orange which was test sprayed
at Elgin in the 1960's has been removed from
the IRP study because it is to be investi-
gated separately. There is an ongoing study
to monitor the effect of Dioxin. The studies
will center on the test spray grid area and
loading hard stand site on the base.

Recommendations to Air Force staff is to
continue their study effort in cooperation
with EPA and to better secure the hard stand
loading area.

ACTION NEEDED

Check recommendations of Phase II Report.

CONTACT: Harry Woolfgang

-------
DATE:	June 30, 1984

NAME:	Tyndall Air Force Base

LOCATION:	Panama City, Florida

I.D.:	AF572124124

MISSION: To provide air denfense combat ready forces
within the designated geographical area of
responsibility of NORAD operational control
and to equip, administer, train, and provide
personnel to develop, validate and test air
defense concepts, doctrines, tactics and
procedures.

AREA: 28,000 acres

POPULATION: 6,900

:OM£>LIAtoCfc' StAtOS

AIR: In compliance by inspection.

WATER: The main wastewater treatment plant's

effluent is pumped to the Bay County regional
lagoon located on Tyndall Air Force Base under
a lease agreement. DMR's for the drone STP
have not been submitted.

RCRA: Part A submitted. Last state inspection was
October 1982 and was found out of compliance
with interim status standards regulation under
40 CFR 265.

CERCLA: Notified, completed Phase I. Phase II field
work has been completed and a report is in
draft stage. Data from Phase II of this
Installation Restoration Program (IRP) will
be obtained from the AFRCE when completed.

TOXICS: PCB's.

f>k66LEM' AREAS

The main wastewater treatment plant is an
extended aeration STP with wet weather holding
lagoon and spray irrigation. The spray field
is under designed and ponding and is not oper-
ating satisfactorily. An agreement has been
reached with the State to tie into the Bay
County regional system by February 1984.

-------
Page 2

Tyndall Air Force Base

The tie-in is now complete and the new system
will be placed inoperation. Several needed
oil separators were reprogrammed from the FY'83
budget to the FY' 84 budget. These oil separa-
tors are needed to prevent oil from entering
the storm water drainage system.

RCRA compliance problems identified in 1982
were administrative interim status standards
violations and have been corrected.

ACTION

Track the Regional tie-in to Bay County and
its compliance.

CONTACT: Patricia Chilton - (904) 283-4354

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME
LOCATION
I.D.

MISSION

AREA:
POPULATION:

Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
Cape Canaveral, Florida
FL 570024407

The Eastern Space and Missle Center which
provides Research and Development to NASA
and the Air Force.

15,374 Acres

20,000

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by source test with regulation
WATER: In compliance.

WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

The facility does not have a state permit.
The facility is operating under NPDES permit
FL-0022071. The wastewater treatment system
discharges to a section of the Banana River
which is classified by the State of Florida
as "Outstanding Florida Waters". The facilit
is considered to be out of compliance by the
State. An on-site test in 1982 showed the
facility to be in compliance, but a bioassay
test in 1983 indicated toxics in the effluent
The facility has not been consistently meetin
the 0.87 mg/1 monthly average for phosphorus
which the State specified for this discharge.
A phosphorus removal system is being planned
and is expected to be completed in FY'85, but
the facility would like a review of the statu
requirements for phosphorus removal.

Part A is on file. Part B has been submitted
Three waste storage areas have been planned a
two of them have been completed. (Hanger R &
D site and Hanger U Building 1744). The othe
site is essentially complete and will be
ready for use by July 1984. The facility is
in compliance with interim State standards.

Notification has been filed. The facility is
in the initial assessment Phase I of the pro-
gram. Seven sites have been identified for

-------
Page 2

Cape Canaveral Air Force Station

further study. The work is being done in
conjunction with the Patrick Air Force Base
study.

TOXICS: Small amounts are handled but no special
problems have been identified.

PROBLEM AREAS

No special problems other than possible
further discussion of phosphate removal
problems.

ACTION

Money has been budgeted for a phosphate
removal facility. However, discharge
limitations for phosphorus and for
"Outstanding Florida Waters" need
clarification.

Contact: Bill Koslow - (305) 853-9525

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: MacDill Air Force Base
LOCATION: Tampa, Florida
I.D.: FL572124582

MISSION: The mission of the current host unit at

MacDill AFB, the 56th Tactical Fighter Wing,
is to train aircrews and maintenance personnel
for the F-16 multirole fighter and to maintain
worldwide deployment capability.

AREA: 5,621 acres

POPULATION: 8,000 military, 1,000 civilian

UJMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: in compliance by inspection.

WATER: In compliance, permit is current, in February
1984, the facility was sited by Florida and the
COE for a Section 404 violations of the CWA.
Mitigation is being planned by the facility'to
resolve the wetlands problems.

RCRA: Submitted Part A. Last state inspection was

made in November 1981, and was in compliance at
that time. The facility has submitted for a
temporary operating permit. The Defense Logis-
tics Agency is preparing a report for the
disposal of hazardous wastes. The facility is
awaiting the results of this report before
submitting Part B.

CERCLA: Notified; completed Phase I, IRP submitted.

Phase IIA field studies have been completed and
they are awaiting the report (Phase iib).

TOXICS: PCB, paints, paint thinner, solvents, paint

remover, acid cleaning solutions, methylethyl
ketone, trichloroethylene, carbon remover, dry
cleaning fluid.

EftOfeLEfo' AftfeAS

The Main Base Plant was out of compliance with
regard to TSS during the past month, a flow
monitoring device was being repaired.

ACllOfJ

Follow up on RCRA storage area and results of
Phase IIB Report.

CONTACT: Bob Moor© - (813) 830-2576

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: NASA J. F. Kennedy Space Center
LOCATION: Cape Canaveral, Florida
I.D.: FL800014585

MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

The J. F. Kennedy NASA facilities serve as the
main support facilities for receiving, inspec-
tion, checkout, launch, recovery and refurbish-
ment of space flights and space shuttle flight
hardware.

140,000 acres

13,000

COMELlAftCfc' STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. Most of the wastewater treat-
ment systems at the KSC NASA facility are small
activated sludge extended aeration type plants.
There are approximately 13 plants in operation
at the installation and several septic tank
systems. Some of the systems are not operated
continuously and some are operated at infre-
quent intervals. During the state inspection
of the facility on February 8-9, 1983, no defi-
ciencies were found in the operation of the
facility. However, money was funded for FY'83
to expand the treatment system in the VAB area
because the present system (STP #4) did not
have sufficient capacity to handle wastes from
the expanded VAP operations. The expansion of
the system had been completed.

RCRA* The facility does not presently meet established
standards. Part A is on file. Part B has not
been called. The facility has interim
status for operating, storage facilities at
KSC are required at strategic locations to
provide storage of hazardous waste prior to
pickup or shipment. Adequate shelter and
containment is required by RCRA and Florida
Administrative Code 17-30. Funding has been
obtained for several storage sites, the last of
which is scheduled for competion by 1985. A
chemical treatment facility for hazardous waste
is scheduled for completion in late FY'84.

-------
Page 2

NASA J.F. Kennedy Space Center

A solid waste incinerator is to be constructed
to allow KSC to transfer the 25 tons of waste
paper and wood collected weekly at the center
into heat energy at the central heating plant.
This will reduce space requirements at the KSC
landfill and oil consumption. Burn control
and monitoring equipment is being obtained for
the hypergol incinerator to meet State of
Florida Administrative Code 17-2 and EPA hazard-
ous waste incineration standards. Hypergol
incinerator modifications which include burn
control and monitoring equipment are scheduled
for completion in 1984.

CERCLAs This site has been inspected by the state. A
Phase I assessment has been made. Phase II
studies are underway and three sites have been
identified for further study.

PROBLEM AREAS

RCRA: Present RCRA treatment and storage facil-
ities are inadequate.

ACTION NEEDED

RCRA - Chemical treatment facilities are
needed to reduce the volume of hazardous wastes
and additional storage facilities are needed
for temporary storage prior to pickup or ship-
ment.

CONTACT: John Ryan - FTS/823-4049

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Fort Benning
LOCATION: Columbus, Georgia
I.D.: GA213720084

MISSION: Main training base for infantry, airborne and
officer candidates, ranger school, and three
Forces Command units. Contains housing units,
seven elementry schools and necessary services
and maintenance facilities.

AREA: 185,000 acres
POPULATION: 43,000

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. Some problems relating to oil,
grease and excessive SS in effluent at Kelly
Hill wash racks and at Engineer Yard. BOD
exceeded NPDES limits at the main plant on two
occasions during 1982, also, fecal coli on
October, November and December 1983, and TSS in
November and December 1983. Kelly Hill wash
rack has been redesigned and is planned for
FY'84. Funding is required to complete the
project. A project has been identified for the
engineer yard and will be planned in FY'84.

RCRA: Part A is on file. Under interim status with
state. Inspected by state January 1983. A
hazardous waste and hazardous material covered
storage area 3600 sq. ft. is planned for FY'84.
Items handled include xylene, unused paints,
thinners, blackoxide, sodium hydroxide, cr
acid, and other DOD hazardous chemicals. The
project is required to assure compliance with
RCRA storage criteria 40 CFR 264/265. The
state has negotiated a Consent Order to main-
tain interim status and has called their Part B.
The storage facility has been designed and funds
are programmed for construction in FY'84.

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. An initial assess-
ment was made by the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Agency (under contract
with a private company) and a report was com-
pleted in July of 1982. The report was negative;
no hazardous sites were found.

-------
Page 2

USA Fort Benning

TOXICS: PCB's and other toxicants handled and used.

No special problems identified except that
the storage facilities described under RCRA
are required. Onsite PCB storage is provided.
PCB's in storage were removed before the
January 1984 deadline.

PROBLEM AREAS

Wastewater - Improvement needed in oil, grease
and SS removals at Kelly Hill wash rack and at
Engineer Yard. On September 16, 1983 controll-
ed bypassing on STP No. 1 was necessary. State
was notified on September 14 and replied that
by passing of untreated wastewater was a viola-
tion of NPDES. A Consent Order and $5,000 fine
was imposed. The fine was later reduced to
$2,000.

ACTION NEEDED

Funds should be provided to correct waste oil
problems at the Kelly Hill wash rack and at
the Engineer Yard. Consent order signed - Sub-
mit part B to state. Hazardous waste storage
facility is funded for FY*84.

CONTACTS Carl Divingi - (404) 545-4766

-------
DATE: June 30, 1984
NAME: USA Fort Gordon

LOCATION: Fort Gordon, Georgia 30905

I.D.: GA213720368

MISSION: Army Signal Corps School - Communication

training, administrative offices, housing,
maintenance facilities and services.

AREA: 55,000 acres

POPULATION: 22,000

COMPLIANCE' StAfOS

AIR:
WATER:

RCRAi

CERCLA s

TOXICS:

In compliance by inspection with regulation.

Reports indicate the wastewater treatment
system (main plant) was in compliance. No
recent reports have been received on the
operation of the wastewater treatment systems.
A letter was forwarded to the Base Commander
July 8, 1983 requesting the reports.

Classified as small generator. Part A is on
file. The site has been inspected by the
state. The present landfill is being closed
and relocated because of possible leachate
problems. A 600 sq. ft. covered storage area
is being provided for hazardous materials.

Items handled include used solvents, thinners,
unused paints, oils and other hazardous chem-
icals. The project is required to assure
compliance with RCRA criteria 40 CFR 264/265.
Part B is not required.

Notification has been filed. The installation
is in the initial assessment stage Phase I of
the IRP. No sites were identified in the Phase
I studies which required further investigation.

Toxic materials are used and handled. No
special problems identified.

EftOfeLEM' AftEAS

Elimination of the landfill is the most pressing
problem. It is scheduled for closure by 1986.
The Base has permission to use the present land-
fill area on an interim basis. A permit is
being secured to operate a new landfill.

Reports on plant operation required.

-------
Page 2

USA Fort Gordon

ACTION

Assurance landfill project will be completely
funded so the 1986 date can be met. Insist
that the facility send DMR reports on sanitary
sewage treatment plant operation to EPA
Region IV quarterly.

CONTACT: Harold Pierce - (404) 791-6801 or 7824

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Fort Stewart

LOCATION: Fort Stewart, Georgia 31314

I.D.: GA214020872

MISSION: Base for 24th Mechanized Infantry Division.

Base includes firing ranges, maneuvering areas,
administration buildings, housing units, main-
tenance areas, schools and services.

AREA: 279,000 acres

POPULATION: 20,000

COfofcLIAfoCfc' Sl-AtOS

AIR;
WATER:

RCRAi

CERCLA:

In compliance by inspection with regulation.

The system is out of compliance, a new regional
wastewater treatment system is being constructed
on the base and the city of Hinesville and Fort
Stewart will be connected to the system when it
is completed except for the industrial system
The system is scheduled for completion in FY*85
The industrial wastewater treatment system will*
not tie into the Hinesville system but will
discharge treated effluent to Mill Creek.

Part A is on file. The installation was in-
spected by the State on March 2, 1983 and
July 26, 1983. The installation does not meet
ISS standards. Storage tanks and fluid level
indicators are being provided for waste oil in
the unit motor pools. Also, at the recommen-
dation of the State, the base is going to the
area method of landfill rather than trenches
because of the higher water table. An 1,000
sq. ft. covered storage area is planned for
completion in FY'85. Materials handled in*
elude used solvents, oils, unused paints, thin-
ners and other hazardous chemicals. Part B has
been called by the State.

Notification has been filed. The installation
is currently in Phase I (initial assessment)
monitoring wells at the old landfill indicate
there is no migration of pollutants off base.

-------
Page 2

USA Fort Stewart

TOXICS: Toxics are handled and used at the installation
but no special problems have been identified.

PROBLEM AREAS

Not meeting standards for wastewater and solid
wastes. New facilities should take care of these
problems. For some reason, the EPD issued a NOV
for the STP and denied construction of a potable
water well on grounds of exceeding STP capacity
which is false. Stewart and EPD due to discuss
this NOV. State has requested Fort Stewart to
submitt a revised RCRA Part A after negotiations
of a proposed Consent Order in early October.

Order was withdrawn.

Wastewater treatment system permit violations for
January 1984 were as follows:

Fort Stewart nujin plant - 71 percent BOD removal.
The plant cannot meet the required 85 percent BOD
removal and cannot meet facal-coli permit levels
during heavy rains.

Package Plant TAC-X - NH3 exceeded during low flow
Package Plant Evans Heliport - SS exeeded during
low flow

Package Plant Building 8052 ~ fiOD exceeded during
low flow

Package Plant Building 8584 - BOD exceeded during
weekend high flow

Package Plant Building 8664 - exceeded permit
requirements and was shut down and tied into main
plant.

ACTION NEEDED

Assure that industrial wastewater treatment
system can meet NPDES permit requirements secure
funds for RCRA storage facilities.

CONTACT: Dale Kiefor - (912) 767-2010

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: U.S. Marine Corps Supply Center
LOCATION: Albany, Georgia

I.D.: GA17000694

MISSION: The U.S. Marine Corps Supply Center is the

logistic supply center for the eastern U.S.A.
and the European theater. The base has 19
warehouses, a rework area, an administrative
area, housing and maintenance facilities.

AREA: 3,200 acres

POPULATION: 2,145
C6MEL1&KCS' STAfrOS

AIR: In compliance with regulations.

WATER: In compliance. The base has facilities for
treating both industrial and domestic wastes.
The industrial wastes are pretreated sufficiently
so that they can be combined with the domestic
wastes and receive final treatment meeting state
and NPDES requirements. However, a survey is
presently being made of the industrial waste
treatment system to ascertain whether improve-
ments are needed. Final report has not yet
been issued.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The project has been inspect-
ed by the state. Part B was filed on September
23, 1983. A project is planned for FY'84 pro-
viding 4,000 sq. ft. of covered storage area
for hazardous material wastes. Items handled
include: used solvents, oils, fuel sludges,
unused paints# thinners, degreasers, and other
hazardous material waste. The project is re-
quired to assure compliance with RCRA storage
criteria 40 CFR 264/265. The dried sludge from
the industrial waste treatment system is con-
sidered to be hazardous waste because of its
high heavy metal content and is shipped to
Emelle, Alabama, for ultimate disposal. A
Groundwater monitoring system was installed on
September 15, 1983 at the sludge drying beds to
determine if the groundwater is being contamin-
ated. Failure by the facility to provide a
groundwater monitoring system by November 19,
1981 under ISS caused a Consent Order to be
issued on September 28, 1983 and a $2000 fine
to be assessed. The state inspection of

-------
Page 2

U.S. Marine Corps Supply Center

of April 20, 1983 indicated violations of
40 CFR 265.13, 265.14, 265.15, 265.32, 265.90,
and 264.174. The two year variance granted by
EPD on May 18, 1981 expired in 1983. All
violations were mentioned in the Consent Order
and compliance rectified by November 23, 1983.
The facility can continue to operate under
conditions of the Order until Part B permit is
issued.

CERCLAs Notification has been filed. Initial assess-
ment studies for Phase I are underway. Field
studies to begin in August 1984.

TOXICS: Some toxic wastes are handled (PCB's) but no
special problems have been identified.

AfefcAS

No special problem areas have been identified
pending results of field studies for CERCLA
except as mentioned under RCRA section.

Follow the Part B development and ISS com-
pliance and Consent Order findings.

CONTACT: Phillip Ramsey (912) 439-5661

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USN Fleet Ballistic MSSB
LOCATION: Kings Bay, Georgia
I.D.: GA 170027395

MISSION: The base serves as a Fleet Balistic Missle

Submarine Base and Submarine Support Base for the
Atlantic Fleet. The base contains docks, wharfs
and support facilities, administrative offices,
family housing, maintenance shops and the neces-
sary utilities to serve the area.

AREA: 16,000 acres

POPULATION: 2412
COMfcLIAtiCfc'SfAtOS

AIR: Not yet inspected by State - no known problems.

WATER: In compliance. The base has a system for treat-
ing domestic waste, ship to shore waste and bilge
wastes. Operating records show the system is
presently meeting NPDES and state standards.

Some problems with oil and TSS in the past.
Improvements were made to the system in 1983 and
the system is now operating satisfactorily.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has not been in-
spected by the state. Items handled include
solvents, fuel sludges, degreasers, cleaners,
unused paints, thinners, and other hazardous
materials. The State has called for Part B. It
is due to be submitted by the end of April, 1984.
The Base presently has an interim 2880 sq. ft.
storage facility. The Base is Planning a Hazard-
ous Storage Bldg. (6400 sq. ft.) to be ready by
1969.

CERCLA: The installation is not currently part of the

formal Installation Restoration Program, but is
under evaluation for possible later inclusion. A
PCB transformer storage area was identified as
causing soil and possible ground water contamina-
tion. The PCB's were cleaned up in September of
1982.

TOXICS:

Transformers with PCB's are handled.

-------
Page 2

USN Fleet Ballistic MSSB

problem areas

None at present.

ACTION NEEDED

Completion of storage area for hazardous
materials. Transport PCB contaminated soil
and liquids in accordance with epa rules and
regulations40CFR761.

CONTACT: Mike Anderson - FTS/970-4620

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USAF Plant #6
LOCATION: Marietta, Georgia
I.D.: GA572024606

MISSION!

AREA;
POPULATION:

Construction and modification of airplanes.
Base includes administrative offices, man-
ufacturing facilities, services and mainte-
nance facilities. The operation is a GOCO
facility by Lockheed Georgia Company.

933 acres

150 AF (14,000 full operations with civilians)

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance. Main waste water treatment
plant is meeting NPDES standards. However,
there are problems with oil and fuel oil
entering the storm water system and possible
contamination of receiving surface water
streams and ground water from spills. It is
planned to provide oil/waste separators, con-
tainment curbs, basins and drains at 19
locations to prevent and/or contain spills of
oil and hazardous wastes. Money is budgeted
for FY85. Also, money has been budgeted for
FY84 to upgrade the industrial waste treatment
plant.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has been inspectec
by the state. Three batch holding tanks are
being repaired and/or relined to meet RCRA
compliance. A curb, sump and pump will be
installed (FY84) to contain waste spills from
the scrap trailer loading dock near Building
B31; and industrial waste treatment plant
sludge basin is to be eventually eliminated.
An alternative method of handling the materials
to comply with RCRA standards is being investi-
gated. Part B has been called and is under
review. AFP #6 received a RCRA NOV on Septmebe
16, 1983 siting ISS violations caused by failui
to notify state EPD of changes in groundwater
conditions on time specified in Georgia's
rules. Also, NOV discusses delays in permittii
due to funding. State, EPA and AF Plant #6

-------
Page 2

USAF Plant #6

CERCLAs

TOXICS:

PROBLEM AREAS

Oil in surface waters; disposal of contaminated
industrial wastes.

ACTION NEEDED

Money needs to be funded for oil/water sepa-
rators and an industrial waste treatment plant
project. Part B issues must be resolved ASAP
to allow RCRA permitting in early 1984. Facil-
ity owner/operator issue must be resolved to
complete Part B review.

have met on these issues. The state and AFP #6
are currently negotiating a consent agreement
which outlines activities and deadlines required
to attain a Part B permit.

Notice has been filed. Phase I of the IRP Survey
was completed in December 1983. There were ten
sites identified as needing further investigation
in Phase II. Phase I report is due for release
in April 1984.

Some toxics including PCB's are handled and used
but no special problems are identified.

CONTACT: J. Arnold - (404) 424-3760

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Moody Air Force Base
LOCATION: Valdosta, Georgia
I.D.: GA572124106

MISSION: To maintain a high worldwide deployment
capability in support of U.S. and allied
forces. Base for Rapid Deployment Force,
347th Tactical Fighter Wing. Base contains
administration buildings, housing, airport
facilities, maintenance facilities,
and services.

AREA: 3,700 acres

POPULATION: 6,826

AIR: Out of compliance. Floating sealed pans are
to be installed in four above ground JD-4
fuel tanks to control vapor emissions.

WATER: In compliance. Some problems existed in the
past with regard to ammonia violations.

This problem was corrected by improving the
aeration and recirculation. Also, the system
could be improved by installing a holding
basin ahead of the treatment plant and/or
correcting infiltration problems. An oil/
water separator was installed at the air-
craft washrack and placed in service during
March 1984. Fire fighting foam has in the
past on occasion been released to the sani-
tary sewer system. This material has a
high BOD and would overload the system.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The facility has not

yet been inspected by the state. Hazardous
waste material handling is to be upgraded
by the construction of a new hazardous
waste storage facility scheduled for FY87.
Materials to be handled include solvents,
fuel sludges, degreasing materials, cleaners,
unused paints, thinners and other DOD hazard-
ous chemicals. The project is required to
assure compliance with RCRA Storage Criteria
4CFR 264/265.

-------
Page 2

Moody Air Force Base

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. Phase I has
been completed. A DDT burial ground has
been identified and money has been budgeted
for FY 84 for monitoring wells and sampling
at old landfill areas.

In service electrical units will also be
tested for PCB contamination. No evidence
was found in the Phase I Studies that
hazardous contaminates migrated beyond
Moody AFB boundaries. Nearby off-base and
on-base water supply wells did not exceed
primary drinking water standards for pesti-
cides and heavy metals. A low permeability
clay layer exists at a depth of 100 to 150
feet. A limited Phase II monitoring program
is recommended for sites 3,8,12, and for
Mission Lake.

TOXICS: Toxics handled include degreasing fluid,
fuel sludges, thinner and other toxic
chemicals. Facilities planned should place
them under proper control.

PROBLEM AREAS

Storage of hazardous wastes. Control of oil
and foam into STP. Further study of hazard-
ous waste sites including Mission Lake.

ACTION NEEDED

Complete funding of necessary projects to
control pollution in wastewater and hazard-
ous waste sites.

CONTACT: Bob Strom - (912) 333-3070 or 3069

-------
DATE:	June 30, 1984

NAME:	Dobbins Air Force Base

LOCATION:	Marietta, Georgia

I.D.:	GA 571224306

MISSION: Air Force Reserve Base, reserve training
for C-130, F-4, Army helicopters, etc.

AREA:
POPULATION:
COMPLIANCE STATUS
AIR:

1,720 Acres

2,000 military and civilian

MATER:
WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

TOXICS:

In compliance by inspection with regulation.
The facility has been inspected by the State.

In compliance. Water is obtained from Lockheed.

In compliance. All wastewater is treated at the
Lockheed sewage treatment plant.

In compliance. Part A has been filed. Part B
has not been called. All hazardous wastes are
shipped to Fort Gillem for disposal at that
facility. Waste oils are handled by contract.

Notification has been filed. Initial Assessment
Study Phase I has been completed. Facility is
now in Phase II of CERCLA program.

Thinners and cleaners are handled at the facility,
but no special problems have been identified.

PROBLEM AREAS

No special problems.

ACTION

None required.

Contact: Bill Nealon - (404) 429-4803

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Robins Air Force Base
LOCATION: Houston County, Georgia
I.D.: GA571724330

MISSION: Robins AFB is an Air Force Logistics Command

Material Area Headquarters whose prime mission
is to supply parts and repair facilities for
the major aircraft in the Air Force inventory.
In addition, Robins AFB acts in a "systems
management" capacity for about 13 aircraft, 8
missle systems and about 150 federal stock
classes of materials.

AREA;

6,651 acres

POPULATION: 22,417
COMPLIANCE' StAtOfe

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.

WATER: The wastewater treatment system is now (as of
12/30/83) in compliance. The treatment plant
met all NPDES parameters during January 1984
but was out of compliance with regard to one
PH reading (5.5) and one ammonia reading (7.1
mg/1) for February of 1984. A flow recorder
should be installed at outfall 008 to insure
compliance with permit requirements. A flow
monitoring system should be installed at the
treatment plant effluent (outfall 009) to
ensure that all flows are measured accurately
and to comply with permit requirements. This
equipment is to be included in the FY 86 pro-
gram. Sample collecting, testing, and report-
ing, should be improved as recommended in the
EPA inspection Report of November 8-10, 1982.
Discharge Monitoring Reports of the main treat-
ment plant (May through July) showed violations
of ammonia nitrogen parameter. Ammonia strip-
ping facilities were completed in September of
1983, but there were problems with the founda-
tions and the plant failed to meet permit
requirements because of part of the system
being out of operation. The rebuilding of the
trickling filters, foundation corrections,
rebuilding of the carbon regenerator, correction
of chlorine weighing and miscellaneous equipment
repairs improved the efficiency of the plant.

-------
Page 2

Robins Air Force Base

All of these items have been completed with the
exception of the carbon regenerator which still
needs repair.

RCRA: The facility was inspected by the state in April
1983. The facility generates, treats, trnsports,
stores and disposes of hazardous wastes. Part A
is on file. On May 4, 1983, the base was notifi-
ed of being in violation of ISS regulations for
the handling, transporting and storage of
hazardous materials. This violation was satis-
factorily resolved on June 7, 1983. The hazard-
ous waste storage facilities at the base are
being evaluated with a DOD wide survey of all
installations and their respective disposal
requirements. As a result, this facility will
be reinstated as a DOD requirement, after
survey evaluation. A new hazardous waste
storage area, 7500 sq ft covered storage and
850 sq ft open storage area are budgeted for FY
1986. This is awaiting DPDS disposal actions.
A revised Part A was submitted on August 1,

1983.

CERCLA: Notification filed, Phase I completed and some
pollution problems identified. Phase II, sam-
pling and analyses of waste disposal sites to
verify the potential for groundwater contamina-
tion and migration is still in process. Phase
II B is scheduled for completion in June of

1984.	Phase IV of IRP, corrective action, has
been budgeted for FY 86. Sites with high
potential for contamination migration are the
sludge lagoon, Landfill No. 4 and 1979 DDT
spill. The facility has been proposed for NPL
hazardous ranking.

TOXICS: Some PCB's and toxic materials handled,
special problems.

No

PROBLEM' AREAS

Water - Some improvement is needed in the opera-
tion of the wastewater treatment system to meet
NPDES and State requirements on a continuous
basis. The improvements underway should solve
the problem.

-------
Page 3

Robins Air Force Base

RCRA: The hazardous waste storage facilities at the
base are planned for conversion by DLA. A new
hazardous waste storage facility is budgeted
for FY185.

CERCLA: Action necessary depends on results of Phase II
studies and the NPL ranking.

ACTION NEEDED

Necessary corrective action is underway except
for CERCLA which depends on completion of Phase
II B studies and NPL ranking.

CONTACT: Shawn Politino - (912) 926-6037

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:	V.A. Center, Dublin

LOCATION:	Dublin, Georgia 31021

I.D.:	GA360010264

MISSION:	Veterans Administration Center

AREA: 175 acres

POPULATION: 2,000

COMfrLlAftfcE' SfrAfrOS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulations.

WATER: No notice of violation from state. Assumed
to be in compliance. The wastewater treat-
ment system consists of a small package plant
designed to handle 0.175 m.g.d. of sanitary
sewage. No operation reports have been re-
ceived, so we have no assurance that the waste
treatment plant is in or out of compliance.
Facilities Engineer has agreed to forward
reports to EPA.

RCRA: The installation is classified as a small
generator. However, small quantities of
some hazardous materials show up in the
sewage sludge as follows: silver 203 ug/1,
barium 1091 ug/1, chromium 82 ug/1, copper 240
ug/1, lead 275 ug/1, aluminum 563 ug/1, other
elements were in trace amounts or were non-
hazardous.

CERCLA: No sites at the installation suspected of
containing hazardous wastes.

TOXICS: Small amount of some toxics handled in
hospital. No problems identified.

EfebfeLEh' Aftfe&S

Need reports of wastewater treatment plant
operation.

Insist that the facility send DMR reports
to EPA, Region IV quarterly.

CONTACT: Tim Averette - (912) 272-1210 - Ext. 424

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Fort Knox

LOCATION: Louisville, Kentucky

I.D.: KY 213721405

MISSION: Army basic and advanced training, armor
vehicle training, NCO training, ROTC
summer training program.

AREA: 109,000 acres

POPULATION: 37,438

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance, permit is current.

RCRA: Submitted Part A. State inspected November
1982, and the facility was in compliance.
Part B has been submitted and a hazardous
waste storage building is presently being
constructed and is scheduled for completion
during FY84.

CERCLA: Notification; Phase I, Installation Restora-
tion Program completed - The Phase I
report recommended no further investigation.

TOXICS: Pesticide/herbicide storage and management
facility is needed because present methods
and storage facilities are inadequate.

PROBLEM AREAS

Review of the DMR's show the facility in
compliance, but they are having problems
maintaining NPDES permit limits. Problems
are caused by the break down of the RBC
units which were installed to take care of
BOD and Ammonia. As of September 1983 over
half of these units are down and the facility
has been maintaining contiuned operations
through alternate processes. In accordance
with the Federal Facilities Agreements
executed in December 1980, it was planned to
have all these units back in operation by
July 1983. Because of problems between the

-------
Page 2

USA Fort Knox

C.O.E. and the manufacturer, repairs to the
RBC units has been delayed. It is planned
for repairs to start in October 1983 and
construction should be completed by July
1984.

The NPDES permit called for central wash
racks to be completed by July 1983. Because
of difficulties with the contractor, the date
of completion will be 4th quarter of FY184.

There are no RCRA problems. The facility is
planning to construct a new hazardous waste
storage facility in 1984 and will require a
Part B permit.

AtT16ft

Follow the correciton of the RBC units,
and the pesticide storage management problem
(residue management); make sure a Part B
permit is acquired prior to construction
of RCRA storage facility.

CONTACT: Van Smith - FTS/354-3629

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Lexington-Blue Grass Depot Activity
LOCATION: Lexington/Blue Grass, Kentucky
I.D.: KY213820105

MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

Lex'ihfrfcoh - storage of communication equipment,
repair and maintain communication equipment.
felue' Girksb - ammunition storage and demilitar-
ization of ammunition including chemical agents.

Lexington - 780 acres; Blue Grass - 14,596 acres

Lexington - 1,200; Blue Grass - 600

COftELtAftCfc' SftAtDS

AIR: In compliance by source test.

WATER: In compliance. Has three discharge permits
which are current.

RCRA: Part A submitted. State performed last inspec-
tion on June 24, 1983 and found the facility to
be in compliance. Facility is preparing Part
B. The state called for Part B on March 22,

1984.

CERCLA: Notified. Completed Phase I & II of the Instal-
lation Restoration Program (IRP). The report
indicated that no pollutants had crossed the
facility boundaries.

TOXICS: Organics, inorganics, acids, bases, heavy metals.

JPfeG&tfeM' AftfcAS

Even though the STP plant is functioning within
permit limits, a bypass and overflow problem
arises during heavy rain storms. A survey of
the system was made and problem areas have been
identified. It is planned to let a contract to
correct infiltration problems.

Under CERCLA they have completed both
Phases I & II of the IRP and the report recom-
mends no additional monitoring studies are
needed and indicates no major problem areas.

-------
Page 2

USA Lexington-Blue Grass Depot Activity

The state has requested that they continue
monitoring the wells for another two years
on a semi-annual basis or until results in-
dicates no further monitoring is needed.

ACTION

Continue to follow CERCLA monitoring and
correction of infiltration problems.

CONTACT:

Gerry Metcalf - FTS/353-2833 - Ext. 4201

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:
LOCATION:
I.D. :
MISSION:

Fort Campbell
Fort Campbell, Kentucky
KY214020140

To advance combat readiness of 101st Airborne
Battalion. Includes housing, training areas,
maintenance shops, administrative buildings
and services.

AREA: 105,397 acres

POPULATION: 37,107

COMfrLlAKCr STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulations.

WATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

TOXICS:

Out of compliance. The main treatment system
meets NPDES requirements but the bladder repair
area does not meet oil and grease standard for
discharges. An oil/water separator is planned
for the bladder repair area in the 4th quarter
of FY*84.

Part A is on file. The site has been inspect-
ed by the state. Scum on a wastewater treat-
ment plant digestor was found to contain in
excess of 50 ppm of PCB's. The removal of this
material to an approved disposal site was
completed on February 1, 1984. A 1200 sq.
hazardous covered material storage area is
being planned for construction in FY'85.
Materials handled include used solvents, oils,
used paints, thinners, and other DOD hazardous

chemicals.

Notification has been filed. No known sites
with pollution were identified.

A pesticides/herbicide storage facility was
completed in 1983.

ft.

EftftfeLEft' AftfeAS

Oil from bladder repair area. Projects under-
way should meet RCRA standards.

AfcTlbto

None other than that underway.
CONTACT: Neal Smith - (502) 798-3487

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Naval Ordinance Station

LOCATION: Louisville, Kentucky
I.D.: KY170024175

MISSION: Manufacture and rework various weapons

systems, components and accessories, such as
large gun mounts, missile handling equipment,
and missle components.

AREA: 132 acres

POPULATION: 24,000

CfctofcLlAfoCfe' StAttJS

AIR: In compliance by inspection.

WATER: Sewer system was connected into regional

system in fall of 1982. An NPDES permit is
no longer required.

RCRA: Part A was submitted. State inspected the
facility in April 1983, and found the
facility to be out of compliance with interim
status standards requirements. The state has
called for RCRA Part B application.

CERCLA: No involvement at this time.

TOXICS: PCB, solvents, paint, paint thinner, paint
remover, phosphate sludge, electo-plating
waste, chromic acid, sodium hydroxide sludge,
tetraethyl chlorine, waste cyanide solution.

J>fc06L£M' AREAS

The state is presently discussing volatile
air limits to control the spray painting
booths. Most of the air sources have been
permitted by the state.

The state has cited the installation for not
having an ISS, RCRA waste analysis plan for
the various hazardous waste stored and for
not having a completed training program.

They They were cited for not having lids on
hazardous waste collection drums containing
chemicals and for not storing them in areas
designated for hazardous waste storage. The
facility has acted for construction of a new
hazardous facility.

-------
Page 2

Naval Ordinance Station

The state has also asked that the facility
do an analytical analysis of their various
process vats in order to determine the con-
tents. The facility is presently performing
this analysis.

The state has also requested that certain
substances in the wastewater be registered as
hazardous waste. The facility has programmed
in the 1985 budget a reverse osmosis system
for reclaiming heavy metals from their plating
vats.

A letter dated February 15, 1984, from the
State Division of Waste Management, Enforce-
ment Branch, sites the facility for being in
violation of the Kentucky waste management
laws and regulations and an agreed order ex-
ecuted July 21, 1983 to resolve these viola-
tions. Major item of violation includes the
operation of a large drum container storage
area without a proper permit. An extension
was granted to the original order for han-
dling of the drums to January 2, 1984, because
of difficulties with the first contractor.
At this time, the second contractor is in
breach of contract and the state advises that
the continuing delays are unacceptable within
the framework of the Kentucky hazardous waste
management laws and regulations.

Follow the RCRA Part B development and issu-
ance. Resolve drum storage and disposal
issue. Secure funding for RCRA program and
wastewater treatment of heavy metals.

CONTACT: Doug Meadors - FTS/355-5011

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:	Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

LOCATION:	Paducah, Kentucky

I.D.:	KY 890008982

MISSION:	Production of highly enriched uranium.

AREA:	6040 acres

POPULATION:	1500
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by source test.

WATER: DMR's have indicated some problems with BOD and
pH, however, for the most part they are in com-
pliance. Permit has expired, application is in
house. State will issue the new NPDES Permit.

RCRA: Part A has been submitted to the state. Part B
has not been called. DOE has suggested that
their activities may not be covered by RCRA.
General Counsel (EPA) has ruled that DOE is
covered but the ruling did not say to what extent.
A meeting was held and a Memorandum of Understand-
ing between EPA and DOE was formulated as of
February 22, 1984. The MOU is intended to develop
a management strategy for these hazardous wastes
which are riot controlled exclusively by DOE.

CERCLA: Notified? the Kentucky Army Ammunition Plant,

which was the previous owner of this land, managed
a landfill in which possible hazardous materials
were buried. To date no action has been taken to
investigate this site. According to Mr. Baker,
water quality in a lake below the site indicates
there is no seepage of contaminants from the site.
We have no data on actual sampling and testing of
the water for chemical constituents. Sampling
should be done to assure there is no seepage of
contaminants.

TOXICS: PCN, solvents.

-------
Page 2

Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant

PROBLEM AREAS

The problem with the BOD and pH is reported to a
seasonal violation. It is attributed to heavy
algea growth during the summer months. They are
presently working on the problem and have not
found a satisfactory solution. The ESD performed
a compliance status inspection on December 7
through December 9, 1983. The inspection indicat-
ed that environmental controls were generally
satisfactory but some additional information was
needed.

ACTION

Follow the issuance of new NPDES Permit since KY
was delegated Federal Facilities NPDES on October
31, 1983. Request DOE to investigate old Army
landfill*

CONTACT:

Mr. Baker - FTS/355-6205 - Ext. 285

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

FACILITY: Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant

LOCATION: Picayune, Mississippi

I.D.: MS 213816123

MISSION: The facility produces new 155 mm military
artillery rounds.

AREA: 7,000 acres

POPULATION: 500 + (presently not fully active)

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:

Out of compliance.
EPA on February 2,
by July 31, 1984.

WATER:

RCRA:

CERCLAi

TOXICS!

Inspected by the State and
1984. Compliance is ordered
Since the facility cannot
meet the order a new agreement will be develop-
ed as a compromise to place the facility on
a compliance schedule. Several problems need
resolution (See problem areas).

In compliance. Permit is current. Wastewater
is presently being hauled to Port Arthur for
deep well injection while system is being re-
paired.

Part A is on file. Part B permit has been
issued. RCRA storage areas have been com-
pleted. The explosive waste incinerator
has not yet been completed.

Notification has been filed. Phase I of the
Installation Restoration Program was started
in October of 1983. A draft report has been
published. Significant cleanup is involved.

The following toxic materials are handled:
Sulfuric and nitric acids, phosphoric hydroxide,
caustic soda, chromic acid, sodium dichromate,
trichloroethane, Drew 201, Drew 205, Semcoll-RY.

PROBLEM AREAS

AIR: The facility was inspected by the State and
commission order No. 653-83 was issued on
September 20, 1983 siting violation of limits on
particulate matter for individual operations in
the projectile metal parts manufacturing area
(oDerations 1025A1, 1025A2, 2030, 3030, and the
weld band operations 1095A1, 1095A2, 1095A3, and
1095A4). Compliance is ordered by July 31, 1984

-------
Page 2

Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant

Projectile Manufacturing Building No. 1 is also
under a compliance order. There are problems
with the precipitators burning out. They are
scheduled to be fixed by March 15, 1984. The
compliance order calls for the system to be in
compliance by June 30, 1984.

Emission No. 5 - Coal Fuel Steam Generating Plant.
The first test was marginal so the State ordered
additional tests. Additional tests were tried but
the tests could not be accomplished because of poor
design of test components.

The explosive waste incinerator has not yet been
completed. Design problems are holding up its
completion. A demonstration test has not yet
been run for the incinerator.

There are no problems at present with emission
points 2,3, and 4 which are not yet on line. A
meeting is being held (3/2/84) to decide on a
course of action. Since the steam plant does
not work* the plant is being turned back to the
COE for resolution.

WATERS A new industrial waste water treatment plant was
construced and was being used when the cold spell
of December 24, 1983 to January 1, 1984 froze
piping and made the plant inoperative. A
repair project is presently underway. Wastes
are presently being hauled to Port Arthur by
tank truck in accordance with RCRA regulations
where they are being disposed of by deep well
injection.

CERCLA: A landfill which was once used by NASA but now
belongs to MAAP may contain hazardous material
in significant quanities according to a survey
report which as just been released in draft
form. The MAAP does not need the landfill area
for their operation so they intend to turn the
land back to NASA for cleanup.

ACTION NEEDED

(1)	Develop new agreement for air compliance and
complete necessary construction for compli-
ance with air standards.

(2)	Determine extent of cleanup required under
CERCLA program.

(3)	Complete repairs to waste water treatment

CONTACT: Duane Matherly - (601) 467-8933

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:	Columbus Air Force Base

LOCATION:	Columbus, Mississippi

I.D.:	MS571524060

MISSION:	Pilot training and minor repair,

AREA:	3,900 acres

POPULATION: Military 3,050; Civilian 602
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance. The facility presently has two
discharge permits. Permit MS0001473 was for
surface drainage. The permit expired in August
of 1980 and the state made an inspection of the
site on March 13, 1984 to determine the param-
eters required for this discharge or whether it
should be discontinued as requested by Columbus
AFB. More information was requested by the
state including chemical properties of biocides
used in cooling towers and volume of blowdown.
Permit MS0040258 is for the main plant. This
permit is due to expire in December 1984 and a
renewal application will be submitted.

RCRA: Part A submitted. Last inspection made by State
was in November 1983; no problems were indicated
and the facility was in compliance with ISS of
RCRA. However, the Defense Logistics Agency
(Memphis? TN) is scheduled to visit the facility
during the 4th quarter of FY'84 to discuss
plans for building a hazardous waste storage
facility.

tpppla. Phase I of the Installation Restoration Program
c&kci-a.	inspection) has been completed and a draft

reoort is essentially completed. The Final Re-
port is due in June 1984.

TOXICS! Solvents, pesticides, heavy metals, acids, PCB.

PROBLEM AREAS

None except State should make a RCRA ISS Inspec-
tion in 1984. The state is working to renew
the expired NPDES permit.

ACTION

Follow NPDES permit developments, PCB management
after January 1984.

CONTACTs Niles Cruthirds - (601) 434-7569

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:	Keesler Air Force Base

LOCATION:	Biloxi, Mississippi

I.D.:	MS571524164

MISSION:	Technical training in non-
medical training and elect

AREA:	3,545 acres

POPULATION:	23,000

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance.

WATER: In compliance. Miscellaneo<
permit has expired. The sti
reviewing the application fc
The main wastewater collect!
nected to Regional system.

RCRA: Presently in compliance. La:
made on November 1982. Part
mitted. A new hazardous wast
is needed. Part B will be pt

CERCLA: Phase I of the Installation R
was completed in January 1984
some survey work and has ideni
for study. The draft report c
studies recommended seven addi
further investigation.

TOXICS: Cutting oil mixed with fluores>
mixed paint, mercury, PCB.

PROBLEM AREAS

Complete the phasing out of PCBj
as transformers, oil switches a:
electrical devices that utilize*
tract was let in the winter of j
PCB management program.

ACTION

Pollow the development of the IR1
check on PCB management after Jai

CONTACTs John Durham - (fin-1*

-------
Page 2

Seymore Johnson Air Force Base

PROBLEM AREAS

Permitting of air facilities. Bringing
wastewater into compliance.

ACTION

Additional information has been requested for
some of the air equipment. This needs to be
furnished before permits can be finalized.
Planning needs to be completed and contracts
let for constructing the City of Goldsboro
sewage treatment plant.

Contact:

Donny Jones - (919) 736-5514

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Fort Bragg
LOCATION: Fayettevilie, North Carolina
I.D.: NC214020121

MISSION: Primary mission of Fort Bragg involves the training
logistical, and mobilization deployment support of
XVIII Airborne Corps, along with all assigned combat
support and combat service support elements and to
control and support an annual summer encampment for
advance ROTC cadets and assigned United States Army
Reserves and National Guard units.

AREA: 130,800 acres

POPULATION: 130,000

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER: In compliance, present NPDES permit is current.

RCRA:

CERCLA:
TOXICS:

Part A submitted. Classified as a small quan-
tity generator of hazardous waste, was deter-
mined to be in compliance by state inspection
in January 1983. The Base is presently on
Interim Status which will be terminated on
March 30, 1984. They must then meet the 90-day
requirement for the disposal of hazardous wastes,
Part B not required.

Installation restoration effort not required.

Trichoroethene, pesticides, herbicides, fungi-
cides, DS-2.

PROBLEM AREAS

No problem at this time. PCB contamination was
discovered along various roadside shoulders on
base in August 1978. The contamination was the
result of dumping by unknown sources (later
identified). After the discovery, a process was
started culminating in a report and clean up.
Actual clean up was begun in mid 1982 with final
completion on October 27, 1982. Restoration of
the excavated areas was completed November 2,
1982. The WWTP is equipped with RBC Reactors
that have defined failures of the shafts. COE
is investigating cause and corrective measures.

ACTION

Investigate IRP effort, check on RBC investigation.
CONTACTi Andrea Robinson - (919) 396-8207

-------
DATE: June 30, 1984

NAME:	Pope Air Force Base

LOCATION: Fayettevilie, North Carolina

I.D.: NC 570024475

MISSION: Providing tactical airlift support for

airborne forces and other personnel; and
for equipment, supplies and aeromedical
evacuation. Developing airlift tactics.

1,750 acres

9,665

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection with regulation,

AREA:
POPULATION:

In compliance. Water is derived from wells
limed and chlorinated.

In compliance. System ties into Fort Bragg
waste treatment system except for 3 oil/water
separators which meet standards.

In compliance. Part A has been filed. Part B
will not be filed. Material will transported
and stored at Fort Bragg.

Notification has been filed. Contractor has
been hired to do Phase I.

TOXICS: Cleaning fluids, thinners, etc. No identified
problems.

WATER:

WASTEWATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

PROBLEM AREAS

No special problems.

ACTION

CERCLA program needs to be speeded up.
Contact: Mr. Flading - (919) 394-2681

-------
iy/1 X Ci •

June 30, 1984

NAME:	Seymore Johnson Air Force

LOCATION:	Goldsboro, North Carolina

I.D.:	NC 570024474

MISSION:	Providing fighter support a

AREA:	4,300 acres

POPULATION:	18,090
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: The facility is in the proce
mitted. Additional informat
some equipment. All boilers
two paint spray booths and 1
remainder of the facilities a
of being permitted.

WATER:

WASTEWATER:

In compliance. Water is obta
wells located on base. Treat!
lime, sedimentation, filtrati<
and chlorination.

Out of compliance. The sewage
the City of Goldsboro system w
meet established standards. T
Goldsboro is under order from l
their sewage treatment plant,
a project which is in the PY*8L
bringing the system into compli

RCRA: Part A is on file. Part B has
The facility is on interim stat<
State and is in compliance with
measures. The facility has a st
area for PCB's and a hazardous «
area for paint thinners, solvent
presently being constructed.

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. In'
Study, Phase I has been accomplit

TOXICS:

PCB's, paint thinners and solved
at the base,	—

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME»	U.S. Marine Corps, Camp LeJeune

LOCATION:	Onslow County, North Carolina

I.D.:	NC170022580

AREA:	87,000 acres (112,000 acres with water areas)

POPULATION:	75,000
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:	In compliance by inspection with regulation.

WATER: In compliance, however, some problems primarily

ai w re9ar<* to BOD, SS, oil and grease.

Although the Courthouse Bay Sewage Treatment
Plant violated the NPDES permit requirements
for percent removal of BOD and SS for January
and February of 1984, the system is not sig-
nificantly out of compliance. Heavy flows from
oil/water separators have caused the plant flow
on occasion, to exceed design capacity; this
condition did not allow sufficient detention
time to remove the required 85% BOD and SS.
Construction of the new flow equalization basin
ahead of the plant should eliminate shock
loading of the plant during peak flows and
allow sufficient detention time. The construc-
tion contract has been completed and the equal-
ization basin is scheduled to start up in the
near future.

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has been inspected
by the State. Part B has been called and a
permit application is being submitted to the
state.

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. Phase I studies
are complete. Phase II studies are underway.
Of 76 potential sites, 22 sites have been
recommended for further field investigations
which are scheduled to start on April 15, 1984.
The chemical landfill site has the greatest
potential for groundwater contamination.

TOXICS:

PCB's handled prior to disposal

-------
Page 2

U.S. Marine Corps, Camp LeJeune

PROBLEM AREAS

The wastewater treatment system at Hadnot Point
also should be checked to see if it needs an
equalization basin and oil skimmers to improve
the efficiency of this plant.

Both the domestic water supply and the waste-
water treatment system at Courthouse Bay are
under capacity and are being expanded.

ACTION NEEDED

Depends on results of Phase II studies underway.
Check for groundwater contamination at chemical
landfill site. Check compliance of wastewater
treatment system.

CONTACT: Willard Price - (919) 451-5161 or 5988

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
LOCATION: Carteret County, North Carolina

I.D.: NC-170027261

MISSION: Cherry Point is the main Marine Corps Air
Station with training facilities, a rapid
deployment force and major rework facilities.

AREA: 11,000 acres
POPULATION: 15,000
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: Inspection has been made by state, permit

approvals in process. The facility has re-
ceived seven permits and 15 air permits are
in process.

WATER: In compliance. Problems existed primarily

with regard to fecal coliform, Cr, DO and oil.
Some problems are caused by oil from the Naval
Air Base Facility reaching School House Branch.
Skimmer dams are being provided in Mill Creek
and School House Branch. Miscellaneous dis-
charges are being connected to the industrial
system and a dissolved air flotation system
has been added for the treatment of oil*

An industrial waste sludge handling facility
is also being provided. The contract for
updating and repairs to equipment has been
completed. An oil-water separator, for which
funding was delayed, is scheduled for the end
of FY'84.

orPA- Part A is on file. The site has been inspect-
ed by the State. The site does not meet ISS
reauirements for RCRA. A meeting was held with
the state on March 20 to discuss the Part B
Droaram. A storage area for hazardous waste is
in the planning stage. Money has been budgeted
for a 3200 sq. ft. covered storage area for
hazardous materials but is awaiting DPD's
disposal actions. Items handled include sol-
vents PCB's, degreasers, cleaners, acid*
nasticides, paint thinners and other hazardous
SLmieals. This project is needed to assure
compliance with RCRA storage criteria 40 CFR

-------
Page 2

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

264/265. Also, the base has a converted SPCC
concrete pad with a curb and oil separator for
hazardous waste temporary storage.

CERCLA: Notification has been filed. An initial assess-
ment study has been prepared by Water and Air
Research Inc. of Gainesville, Florida. The
report identifies 14 potential pollution sites
which need further investigation. Site 10, and
old dump site, has the most potential for
stream pollution of the sites investigated. A
Phase II contract has been let for starting
work on July 1, 1984 on the 14 sites including
well drilling, sampling testing and monitoring.
The facility has a closure plan with the state
for two surface impoundments used for industrial
waste treatment plant sludge disposal. Pits
were closed 24 January 1983. The contract for
complete closure was awarded November 22, 1983.
The sludge pits were excavated and sludge re-
moved and the area capped by February 13, 1984.
Naval Air rework facility storage area was
closed up by April 1, 1983.

TOXICS: PCB's, acids and degreasing fluids handled at
the facility.

PROBLEM AREAS

WATER: Improvement is needed in the operation of the
wastewater treatment system to meet state and
NPDES requirements. The contracts completed
on March 11, 1984 were planned to bring the
treatment system into compliance but the main
deficiency appears to be in the operation of
the treatment system. On March 20, 1984, the
Cherry Point facilities engineer reported that
their wastewater system had become ineffective
and they were having trouble in meeting NPDES
standards particularily for chrome. They were
told to report the incident to the state. On
March 22 we received a report from the Naval
Investigation Service that they had two em-
ployees in custody which were charged with a
willful act of discharging chrome wastes into
the sewer system. The Federal Activities
Coordinator of EPA reported the incident to the
Regional Counsel for advisement. Consideration
is being given to holding a show cause meeting
with the marine facility management personnel
regarding the incident.

-------
Page 3

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

RCRA: A storage area is needed for hazardous wastes.

CERCLA: 14 possible pollution sites have been identi-
fied. Site 10, an old dump area, has the
greatest potential for polluting Slocum Creek.
The Phase II contract starting on July 1, 1984
should determine the remedial action required.

ACTION NEEDED

Improvement in wastewater treatment operation
to meet state and NPDES requirements. Construc-
tion of storage area for hazardous wastes. An
NPDES compliance inspection by ESD was perform-
ed in February 1984. A diagnostic inspection
by ESD is to be conducted in early May 1984 to
pin point operational problems.

CONTACTS Doug Nelson - (919) 466-3631

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME:

Myrtle Beach AFB

LOCATION:

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

I.D.:

SC572124821

MISSION:

Tactical Air Base Flying A-10 Aircraft

POPULATION:

3,420 Military, 700 Civilian

AREA:

3,793 acres.

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:
WATER:

RCRA:

CERCLA:

TOXICS:

In compliance by inspection.

In compliance. Tied into the Regional
Wastewater Treatment system in January 1982

Part A has been submitted. A state inspection
was made in July 1982. The facility was in
compliance with ISS requirements except for
five underground tanks which have since been
removed. The last inspection was made on
November 30, 1983. The facility was out of
compliance with regard to a dike around a drum
storage area and a sign in a hazardous waste
area which has been corrected.

Has completed Phase I of the IRP and is now in
Phase II. A draft report has been received on
the Phase II studies which recommends continued
monitoring except for the Myrtle Beach Pipe
Line Company property which had a major spill
The monitoring and cleanup work is being handled
by the Pipe Line Company.

Dry cleaning fluids, waste hydraulic fluids,
battery acid, carbon remover, paint stripper,
waste oil and aircraft fuels.

PROBLEM AREAS

Present problem deals with the construction of
a dike or removal of drums.

ACTION

Call Part B application for RCRA Permit.

Check compliance with pretreatment wastewater

standards.

CONTACTi Dick Sooza - (803) 238-7211

-------
DATE:	June 30, 1984

NAME:	Shaw Air Force Base

LOCATION:	Sumter County, South Carolina

I.D.:	SC 572124466

MISSION: The facility is under direction of the Tactical
Air Force Command. Aerial photographic recon-
naissance training is the primary base mission.

AREA:
POPULATION:

3,000 acres
10,000
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation.
In compliance.

WATER:
WASTEWATER:

In compliance. Plant consistently meets NPDES
requirements.

RCRA: Out of compliance. Part A has been filed.

The facility does not presently meet estab-
lished standards. Dikes are required around
a hazardous waste storage area and some ad-
ministrative requirements were violated
regarding proper indentification of wastes in
barrels.

rpprTA. Notification has been filed. Phase I has been
CERCLA. Notitica^ pha3e IIB has been started. Five

sites have been identified for study. No wells
have yet been drilled as of June 18, 1984.

TOXICS: Cleaning fluids, thinners, etc. No special
problems.

PROBLEM AREAS

RCRA: Storage areas.

ACTION

RCRA! Storage areas need revisions to meet

regulations

CERCLA. Wells need to be drilled and monitored.

Contact. Karl Chandler - (805) 668-290S

-------
DATE:	June 30, 1984

NAME:	Marine Corps Recruit Depot

LOCATION:	Paris Island, South Carolina

I.D.:	SC170022762

MISSION:

Training of marine recruits. Physical facili-
ties include administrative, training, housing
quarters and related community and support
facilities. Page Airfield, located in the
southern portion of the reservation, serves in

support of marine aircraft and training opera-
tions.

AREA: 8,034 acres
POPULATION: 7,696
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AlRs In compliance by inspection and regulations.

water- Out of compliance. During the winter months

some difficulty has been experienced in meeting
TSS permit requirements• Some corrective
measures have been made and the system has now
been in compliance except for TSS in February
of 1984. Funds have been requested for addition-
al improvements to the system consisting primari-
ly of improving recirculation facilities.

urnA- Part A is on file. The facility has been in-
sDected by the state. A study Is presently
bSino made and a project is being designed to
nrnvide a 400 sq. ft. covered storage area for
Sa«rdou2 material. The project is awaiting
nco? disoosal action. Part B has not yet been
~Ued b5?"he b«e i» proceeding with the
planning for Part B.

CERCLA:

TOXICS:

Notification has been filed. Phase I initf*7
assessment studies, are underway. '

Some toxics handled (beryllium), no special
problem.

PROBLEM AREAS

Improvement in wastewater treatment olanfr
operation and/or structural correction of
system is still needed to meet standards on *
consistent basis. A covered hazardous sto!-*^
area will be required.	torage

ACTION

Request BSD to conduct CSI in early 1984,

CONTACT x

Calvin Garnett - (803) 525-3897

-------
-jiN Weapons Station
jjUCATION: Charleston, South Carolina

I.D.: SC 170022620

MISSION: Provide material support for assi
weapons system and to perform add.
directed by the Naval Sea System c

AREAs 16,000 acres

POPULATION: 15,193

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance. An ammunition destruct
furnace was completed and brought on 1.
September 1983, Monitoring and testing
required by the Air Permit. Two series
tests have been completed and the system
appears to be in compliance.

WATER: Tied to the Beckeley County regional STP.

Part III of the NPDES is current. This
system is in compliance. The South Annex
has a seperate NPDES permit.

RCRA: Part A has been submitted. State last inspe
tion was August 10, 1983. State found facil.
out of compliance with interim status standar
(ISS) requirements. The facility is presently
submitting a revision to Part A for a storage
area which is scheduled to be completed during
the third quarter of FY'84.

CERCLA; Notified. Phase I of the Installation Restora-
tion Program (IRP) is completed. Preliminary
review of report was completed in August.

Final report was released in September 1983.

Five sites were determined to need confirmation.
Contracts have been let for well drilling and
testing at the sites.

TOXICSs Organics, inorganics, pesticides, heavy metal,
acids, bases, solvents, trichloromethane.

PROBLEM AREAS

The facility connected to the Berkeley County
Regional wastewater treatment system on
July 1, 1983. Part III type discharge remain

active.

-------
Page 2

USN Weapons Station

Under RCRA this facility is out of compliance
with the ISS requirements because of inadequate
inventory of sources of hazardous waste and
inadequate ground water monitoring. The Navy
has increased and improved its hazardous
waste program staff which should provide a
better management of ISS requirements.

The CERCLA program discovered five sites which
may be problem areas. These areas will be
addressed in Phase II of the IRP.

ACTION

Follow the development of IRP for CERCLA re-
commendations. Check on ISS compliance with
RCRA.

CONTACT:

Jessy Manes - (803) 764-7726 or 7626

-------
UHi'lfiS

June 30, 1984

NAME:	DOE Savannah River Plant

LOCATION:	Aiken, South Carolina 2980

I.D.i	SC890008989

AREA:	300 sq. mi.

POPULATION:	10,000

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: Savannah River Plant - In com]:
closed down (L & R Reactors)

SRP Area A - In compliance by
SRP Area C - In compliance by .
SRP Area D - In compliance by ;
SRP Area P - In compliance by s
SRP Area G - In compliance by i

WATER: Out of compliance. To meet NPD1
standards the following projects
planned or are underway: (1) Pa
control suspended solids, pH and
content of coat pile, ash basin,
and other miscellaneous dischargt
powerhouse locations, oil spill c
facilities, alternate ashbasins,
ing and segregating the liquid li
M-area. (2) Present waste water i
are inadequate and enlarged sanite
water facilities are being provide
G area, and 100 P area. (3) An eq
basin is being provided to stabili,
607-7A waste water treatment plant
day and night operation for greatex
(4) Larger package plants are being
in G and 200-F areas to replace the
existing plants. (S) A project is 1
signed to reduce the levels of radic
released and allow direct discharge
streams; treatment plants will be pr
contaminated cooling water. At the j
time, cooling water used in the sepai
areas which becomes contaminated with
activity is currently directed to a 1
retention basin from which water is d
to basins or surface streams depending
level of radioactivity. This practice
possible contamination of ground water

-------
Page 2

DOE Savannah River Plant

surface waters. The project will correct this
condition. (6) A liquid effluent treatment
plant is being provided for the Fuel Prepara-
tion Facility. At the present time process
waste from the Fuel Preparation Facility is
being discharged to an unlined basin. To
eliminate the use of the basin and allow for
its closure, the effluent must be treated to
meet NPDES requirements for discharge to a
surface stream.

RCRAs Part A is on file. The site has been inspected
by the state. The installation does not meet
ISS requirements. Several studies are underway
to determine the extent of soil and ground
water contamination including the following:
(1) organic contamination of groundwater is
currently being investigated in the fuel prep-
aration area. Methods for remedial actions are
being studied. (2) a project is being planned
to construct a containment area around the bulk
chemical storage facilities, to secure a land-
fill for the burial of solid wastes and facil-
ities to burn volatile solvent in the Beta
Gamma Incinerator. The project also controls
nH and includes heavy metals removal from seep-
»ae basins. Storage facilities at the plant
mav need expansion to take care of cleanup
Hork. An area is being provided for oil drum
and battery storage.

CERCLA- Notification has been filed. The site has been
CERCLA. wot!	^ Sfcate# organic contamination

of «ound water is currently being investigated

I rmp Dit waste disposal site and removal
J5 waste from the site as probable remedial
OI	Also, organic contamination of ground

acJ ® I, beina studied at the Silverton Road
mt.l.	specific	action, will

waste sit	p regult8 cf the studies and the

depend up tamination. Based on recommenda-
degr.e of contaminat ^ SQUth Carollna Depart-

tions ° ' ,th an(j Environmental Control, th.
ment of He	the gRp	Water stand*

1 interim basis, the suggested standard
ards, on • * , Academy of Science for
of the	tetrachloroethylene and 1, 1,

Trichlorethylene^tetrac^ ^ # ^ io_6

1-Trichloroet y Region IV recommends the

sEKViSj" 'svbr'

saaasss^j-j/!"

1,1,1-Tricholorethane 22 ug/l

-------
Page 3

DOE Savannah River Plant

TOXICS: Several toxic materials are handled at the
facility but remedial measures listed under
RCRA, CERCLA and waste water treatment should
give adequate control.

PROBLEM AREAS

Discharge of wastes in the CMP pit and at the
Silverton Road Waste site are suspected of
contaminating the groundwater and groundwater
aquifer. The degree of contamination found in
ongoing studies will determine the remedial
actions required. In addition, to ground water
contamination, major items of concern are the
impacts expected from the release of radioactive
materials which will be washed from Steel Creek
into the Savannah River and thermal impacts on
Steel Creek and it has been determined that the
amount of radioactive materials which will be
washed into the Savannah River upon start up of
the L-Reactor or operation of the total facility
will not endanger water supplies or be damaging
to human health or fish and wildlife. The
methods for controlling temperature are still
under study and may include a 1000 acre cooling
nond on Steel Creek. Other items of concern
are the pollutants which may reach surface
streams and ground water supplies from seepage
H*ains. ash basins, solid waste disposal areas
a£d discharges of liquid effluent from the
««naration areas and the fuel and target fabri-
cation areas. Most of these pollutants are
beina controlled by plans or projects unden*ay
residual pollutants left from the previous
SnLltion must be cleaned up under the CERCLA

or equivalent DOE program and protected

further contamination by the RCRA or DOE
from cu	and wa8te water treatment

Pr£?ects before the facility can be judged safe
from an overall environmental standpoint.

ACTION NEEDED

I ,w nation n66d6d is to fund the
wt^neceasary to assure that air and water
pr?it?£ standards are met and that the appropri-

SealicJlons necr«ry^o -^ -t^he^and

«Sare u'"d under

Water, RCRA and CERCLA.

-------
Page 4

DOE Savannah River Plant

All NPDES permits are up for renewal SCDHEC
has drafted these permits for all existing
discharges including the on-line reactors.
All discharges will be controlled at the
point source. Methods of heated water con-
trol and compliance is an issue as well as
the legal means of accomplishing compliance.

EPA, DHEC and DOE needs to meet to finalize
all NPDES permits for SRP.

L-Reactor cannot come on line until both EIS
and NPDES permit is final. Issues in the EIS
must be resolved. RCRA issues must be re-
solved at EPA Headquarters ASAP, in order to
call Part B applications under RCRA, all seep-
age ponds must be evaluated for closure.

CONTACT: Steve Wright - (803) 725-3957

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: Milan Army Ammunition Plant

LOCATION: Milan, Tennessee

I.D.: TN 213820582

MISSION: Load, assemble and pack ammunition for medium
caliber (40-105 mm) projectiles.

AREA: 22,500 acres

POPULATION: 16,050

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection.

WATER:

In compliance except for the coal pile run-
off. The industrial discharge permit has
expired and a draft was sent to the State in
July 1982 for comment and certification, but
the State has not yet certified the permit.
Domestic waste water permits (2) have been
modified and expire in 1985.

Submitted part A. Last State inspection was
juiv 1983. They were found in violation with
40 CFR 264, Interim Status Standards (ISS)

regulations.

Nr>»- i f led j Groundwater was found to be contam-
inated with explosive nitro bodies from TNT,
DOT and RDX. A closure plan has been de-
veloped tor the eleven (11) one cell lagoon
system causing this contamination. Pinal
approval from the State has been requested as

of October 3, 1983.

TOXICS, PCB, pesticides, herbicides, solvents, explo-
sives.

RCRA:

CERCLA:

PROBLEM AREAS

A meeting was held in January 1984 to resolv®
401 certification problems. The State of
Tennessee has held up the renewal of the NPDEs
permit because of a disagreement over the
limits for total nitro bodies. Action on this
has been going on since August 1982. The baa?
conflict is 1.0 mg/1 of total nitro bodies
versus 0.1 mg/1 the State has requested. The
Army intends to appeal this limit. Because of
the lack of Information on the toxicity of tnt

-------
Page 2

Milan Army Ammunition Plant

and RDX, the State set a detectable limit,
not a BAT limitr which we think should be
1.0 mg/1. The Army took action in April
1983 by petitioning EPA to establish a
final drinking water standard for TNT and
RDX. We are waiting for the State to back
off the Notice of Decision, August 1983,
so they can issue a 401 certification.
Because of the lack of progress on this
permit, corrective action on the coal pile
runoff was unresolved and compliance de-
layed. Through the efforts of the State
and EPA, the Army is proceeding to build
a treatment system to take care of the coal
runoff problem based on the draft permit
conditions.

RCRA: Most of the RCRA problems cited by the

State were administrative problems asso-
ciated with interim status. However, the
State did site them for open burning at
the dump sites. The Army is planning to
replace these burning sites with inciner-
ators that will take care of most of the
burning problems. Where a large item must
be destroyed, then a special permit will
be requested. The earliest funding for
such a project would be in 1986. Correc-
tive actions were discussed with the State
in late August 1983. Closure of the
lagoon system should be underway in early
1984.

a qurvev conducted by the Army Toxic and
Hazardous Materials Agency in 1980, in-
dicated groundwater contamination by TNT
rdx Interim source control measures
were implemented in 1981. Contamination
was detected off-post, but it is not con-
sidered to be a health problem. A study to
SIfine the nature and extent of contamina-
tion has been completed. A follow-up study

CndeJway at this time to further evaluate
the health hazard and measures that can be
taken.

The Army has been requested byMAAP to peti-
mX for establishment of final drinking
tion BPA	TNT and RDX. Explosives

U hli!! found in the MAAP water supply

J?®!, State cannot consider safe at any
SiScSn«!tion. Th. Army'. toxlcologlc.1

-------
Page 3

Milan Army Ammunition Plant

studies show that 49 micrograms per liter
for TNT and 35 micrograms per liter for
RDX are safe for human consumption. Studies
of long term effects by the Army have been
recently completed. A decision by EPA is
necessary to resolve this issue. EPA's
decision will be based on the Army's work.

ACTION

EPA needs to establish a drinking water
standard for TNT and RDX as soon as possible.
NPDES issue must be resolved prior to 401
certification. Call Part B for RCRA permit.

CONTACT:

Pat Brew - (901) 686-6965

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

FACILITY:
LOCATION:
I.D. :
MISSION:

AREA:
POPULATION:

Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant
Chattanooga, Tennessee
TN213820933

Production of TNT, DNT and nitric acid for
explosives. The facility is a government owned
plant but was operated by a contractor. The
plant is presently inactive.

7,200 acres

155

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:

permitted?"06' ^ eml3slon	«e

WATER: In compliance; permit is current; exDir**

April of 1985. A new permit will berloui-d
if a new explosive (EAK) is manufactured a
new permit for the manufacture of this material
is presently being worked on but the application
has not yet been made.	cation

RCRA: Part A has been submitted. The stat»	^

the facility in July of !983. The £|Cin?v i_f
presently in compliance. The Part B studv will
be made by the Huntsville Corps of Engineers.

CERCLA: The Phase II monitoring of the Installation
Restoration Program is complete. The report
should be available in the near future. Ground-
water contamination is expected due to past
burial practices and geologic formations.

TOXICS: Organics, inorganics, heavy metals, acids,
bases f PCB's.

PROBLEM AREAS

)

The facility does'not have any particular
ance problems at this time because it has h*T
on inactive status since 1977. Active environ
mental programs are in place and are kept cumm-
in case of activation. It is expected thatIhln
RCRA Part B is called, corrective action may be
required. Phase II IRP is expected to identifv
groundwater concerns.	*

-------
Page 2

Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant

ACTION NEEDED

Decide on paramenters for new permit if new
explosive (EAK) is produced. Check Phase II
monitoirng report for groundwater contaminatior

CONTACT: James Fry - (615) 892-0115 - Ext. 2122

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USA Holston Army Ammunition Plant

LOCATION: Kingsport, Tennessee

I.D.: TN213820421

MISSION: Production of RDX and HMX and/or composition
based on RDX/HMX.

AREA: 6,023 acres

POPULATION: 1,100

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by inspection.

WATER:

RCRA:

In compliance. NPDES permit has been extended.
Renewal of the NPDES permit is being processed.
Certification requested on August 25, 1983.
The facility was inspected by the state in
December 1983; no report has yet been received
from the state.

Submitted Part A. State inspected September
1983 and January 1984, and found them to be
out of compliance with regard to runoff, leach-
ate and wind dispersion at the open buring
around for waste explosives. Facility personnel
met with EPA during the first part of March and
the necessary corrections have been made to
bring the facility into compliance.

tercla- Notified; Phase II of the Installation Restora-

CERCLA. Not^ program (IRP) is in progress.

TOXICS: organics, explosives, solvents, acids.

PROBLEM AREAS

f

m accordance with the 1979 Federal Facilities

„itance Agreement a new industrial wastewater
^SJmeSt Plant went on line in October 1983.
several miscellaneous floor drains and the water

Dlant sludge line will not be connected
JiiiSse of the lack of funding. The renewed

establishes a schedule for these
NPDES	State 401 certification is needed.

submits

is scheduled for PY'85.

-------
Page 2

USA Holston Army Ammunition Plant

Explosive waste is disposed of by open burning
under state variance for air emissions. Explo-
sive waste is hazardous waste and requires
special management under 40 CFR 264/265. Storm
runoff from such burning areas requires control
and studies are underway examining the ground-
water and other alternatives of disposal.

Part B was requested in December '83 but the
facility has asked that this request be recinded
on the grounds that the existing regulations do
not cover open burning of waste explosives and
the regulations will not be promulgated until
1986.

Money was appropriated for working over the tar
pit site and the work has been completed.

ACTION

Issue NPDES after certification. Check on state
401 certification.

CONTACT: Mike Mills - FTS/854-0327

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: USN Naval Air Station
LOCATION: Memphis, Tennessee
I.D.: TN170022600

MISSION: Support training activities in aviation and
technical fields.

AREA: 3,200 acres

POPULATION: 18,000

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification.

WATER' In compliance, however, with some NPDES require-
ments. NPDES permit expired August 1980. Navy
plans to tie into POTW at Millington.

pr»A« Part A submitted. Last state inspection made
in April 1983. Deficiencies with Interim
Status Standards (ISS) requirements were noted.

rvprTA- Notified; Phase I Installation Restoration
CERC proaram (IRP) study near completion. Early
indication is that no serious problems exist.

TOXICS: Ammonia hydroxide, paint thinner, paint waste,
toxic.5.	paint remover, dry cleaning fluid,

solvents.

PROBLEM AREAS

Renewal application for the NPDES permit has
been at EPA since January 1980. Delay in
permit issuance has been caused by the failure
of the Millington Wastewater Treatment system
not preceeding as planned. Navy funding was
also delayed. Tie-in is expected in the early
part of 1985. The permit for the main plant
discharge will be eliminated but the oil—water
separaters will still require a permit.

The main wastewater treatment system is an old
Imhoff tank which is having considerable prob-
lems in meeting present permit limits. It
would not be cost-effective to upgrade this
system or to provide a new STP because of
commitments to tie into the Millington STP.
Punding delays from both the wastewater grant
program and OMB have been solved.

-------
Page 2

USN Naval Air Station

The five ISS administrative requirements in the
RCRA program have been corrected and another
hazardous waste inspection is needed.

ACTION

Proceed with issuance of NPDES for miscellaneous
sources not tied into city system.

CONTACT: George Robertson - (901) 872-5209

-------
DATE:	June 30, 1984

NAME:	Arnold Engineering Development Center

LOCATION:	Arnold Air Force Station, Tennessee

I.D.:	TNS72024044

MISSION: The mission of the facility is to support

the development of airospace systems through
testing and simulation.

AREA: 40,000 acres

POPULATION: 4,065

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation,

POTABLE WATER:

The main base is supplied with water from
Woods Reservoir which receives conventional
alum coagulation, settling, rapid sand
filtration and chlorination. The housing
area receives its water from deep wells
which is chlorinated and flouridated before

use*

waqtfwater- Out of compliance. The main plant wastewater
. treatraent system is a conventional secondary
trickling filter system with a heated
diaester, magnetic flow meter, flow recorder
arid sludge drying beds. This system generally
meets permit requirements except for fecal
coli count after heavy rains. The family
housing area is served by an extended aeration
olant This system was out of compliance during
Tanuarv and May of 1983 because of excessive
sattleable solids carryover. The landing strip
svstem was out of compliance in August 1983
Kcause of pH. The system generally meets
t-Amiirements except for the problem of carryover

aattleable solids and excessive fecal coli
Slmt which is probably due to excessive infil-
lation during storms. Plans for correcting
Jms D?oblem at Arnold Village are underway.

™»in olant system is also being considered
III! Possible work in correcting the infiltration
LKI but no plans are presently underway.

water permit was rev Led „ of

March 7, 1984.

-------
Page 2

Arnold Engineering Development Center

RCRA: Part A is on file. The site has been

inspected and does not presently meet RCRA
requirements. Part B is in process and was
scheduled to be submitted on April 19, 1984.
A letter has been forewarded. The EPA and
the Arnold Engineering Development Center
(AEDC) entered into a Federal Facility
Compliance Agreement on October 13, 1978 to
assure that the AEDC complies with the Toxic
Substance Control Act (TSCA) (15 USC 2601 et
seq) and implementing regulations. The
agreement is for the cleanup of PCB's which
occur at several of the plant facilities.

The schedule for the Federal Facility Compli-
ance Agreement is being met. However,
the following items remain to be completed:

(a)	Clean and purge the remaining plant
systems containing PCB's. Purging and
cleaning 26KF vaccum pumps. Scheduled for
FY84 - presently underway.

(b)	Dispose of Von Karman Facility (VKF) G-
p.nne Capacitors is underway - Scheduled for
completion September 1984.

(c)	Complete the remaining inventory non-
compliance line items.

CERCLA* The CERCLA program for the Arnold Engineering
CERCLA. t	t Center is currently in Phase I

linstallation Assessment). A comprehensive
Win be conducted pending completion
rtf Phase I and results of this survey. A
final report from the contractor doing the
Ph2se I Evaluation was due in the Spring of
1984. A preperformance meeting was held on

April 24, 1984.

PPOBLEM AREAS

.	has been forwarded and several

HCRAt A	p£B cieanup need to be completed as

indicated under RCRA.

treatment systems do not consis-
WATER: Wa8|;?wa*®*t NPDES and state standards.

tently	correct th. Infiltration

*32 main pUnt .y.t.».

-------
Page 3

Arnold Engineering Development Center

ACTIONS NEEDED

RCRAs Cleanup and purging of plant systems still
containing PCB's including the following:
(a) Purge and clean 26K vacuum pumps
and systems. (b) Dispose of Von Karman
facility 6-Range Capacitors, (c) Clean-up
remaining inventory non-compliance line items.

WATER: Infiltration problems in the main plant

system and at the housing area need to be
corrected. Plans are being planned for the
housing area but they should also proceed
with plans for correcting the main plant
system.

CONTACT: Mike Kimbrough - (615) 455-2611 - Ext. 5332

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: DOE Oak Ridge National Lab

LOCATION: Oak Ridge, Tennessee

I.D.: TN 890008981

MISSION: Diverse research and development activities;

reactor operations; radioisotope research.

AREA: 330 acres (26,790 acres of Oak Ridge in which
lab has activities).

POPULATION: 5,700
COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR: In compliance by certification with regulation,

WATER:

RCRAt

Out of compliance. The Oak Ridge National Lab
has a main wastewater treatment plant but has
several miscellaneous treatment systems and
discharges to White Oak Creek and Milton
Branch. Fifteen point source discharge have
been identified. The current permit for the
National Lab has expired. A new permit is in
process. The new permit will cover all dis-
charges but will combine some discharges for
convenience in monitoring. ORNL's main
sewage treatment plant fails to meet state
and NPDES standards, particularly with regard
to BOD and ammonia. A project is being planned
for PY85 which will meet the required discharge
limitations. However, infiltration in the sewer
lines needs to be corrected.

A coal yard runoff treatment system was recently
completed, however, the system does not have the
capability of handling sludge. Because of this
inability the system must be shutdown periodical-
ly to manually remove sludge. A project is
planned for FY84 which will continuously remove
the sludge and dewater it prior to disposal.
The water in White Oak Creek is known to have
radioactive contamination and its source must
be determined. Groundwater is also contamin-
ated.

The facility is out of compliance. The system
does not meet established standards. ORNL
generates significant quantities of wastes which

-------
Page 2

DOE Oak Ridge National Lab

are both radioactive and hazardous. These
wastes are largely organic in nature; ORNL does
not have any means to dispose of these wastes
and is presently storing them. A hazardous
waste incinerator is planned for FY 85. The
proposed facility will render the waste non-
hazardous so that the remaining ash can be
disposed of strictly as radioactive waste. a
material recovery facility is being planned for
FY 86 which will act as a single facility for
Oak Ridge where recovery operations for hazard-
ous waste can be performed. The facility is
needed both to minimize the amount of hazardous
waste shipped off site for disposal and to
allow recovery operations to proceed efficiently.

The ORNL did not have a storage area meeting the
required standards for handling hazardous wastes.
A storage area for drum storage is planned for
completion during FY 84.

ORNL's current facility for storing hazardous
wastes does not provide for the separation of
incompatible chemicals by fire barriers. Since
the facility has only one ventilation system,
vapors from these chemicals can easily mix. A
chemical waste storage facility is being planned
for FY 84 which will provide physically isolated,
separately, ventilated enclosures for six differ-
ent classes of chemicals.

Part B application was submitted for storage
facility in early 1983. Permit process is
complete but an issue as to whom it should be
issued to is being discussed. This is the
owner/operator question.

rpurLA* A oreliminary assessment of the ORNL was made

cekcla. £PpA on 1/25/83. Six solid waste sites were

identified dating back to 1943 when the plant
was opened. Groundwater samples were taken by
DEM from 100 wells and analyzed for 90 Sr, 137
Cs, 60 Co, 3 H and gross alpha. Full measure-
ments included water elevations, pH and conduc-
tivity. Details of the sampling are shown in
the report and indicate that both the ground-
water and White Oak Creek were contaminated
with radioactive materials. Further studies
are needed to define the problem and to recom-
mend a solution. Sites determined to contain

-------
Page 3

DOE Oak Ridge National Lab

hazardous wastes must be cleaned up in
accordance with RCRA regulations.

TOXICS: Toxic waste are handled at this facility and
a drum storage area is being planned for the
temporary storage of these materials.

PROBLEM AREAS

The wastewater treatment system needs to be
upgraded to meet NPDES and state standards
and all point source discharges must be in
eluded in the new permit. The source of
radioactive wastes discharged to White Oak
Creek must be determined and eliminated if
found hazardous. The system for handlina
hazardous waste must be improved as outlined

under RCRA.

A NOV dated October 26, 1983 was sent to DOE
outlining numerous environmental problems in
water, hazardous waste and radioactive waste
management.

ACTION

Staff discussion in the NOV. Meet to discuss
plan of action to resolve violations. Hold a
show cause meeting with DOE and state and
develop a MOU on action necessary to attain
compliance. Issue new NPDES based on new
NPDES application. RCRA issues must be resolv
ed and Part B applications called.

CONTACT: Wayne Hibbitts - FTS/626-1256

-------
DATE
NAME
LOCATION
I.D.
MISSION
AREA
POPULATION

June 30, 1984

DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Plant (K-25)

Oak Ridge, Tennessee
TN 890008981

Production facility for enrichment of uranium.

450 acres

2,500

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIRs In compliance by source test. A scrubber and
flouride manifold has been replaced which func-
tions to eliminate flouride. A meterological
tower is also being installed to help in the
administrative control of flouride emissions.

water- Out of compliance. The original permit was
inadequate and expired in 1980. K-25 is now
operating under a new NPDES permit which was
issued on February 21, 1984. Although, on
a few occasions, the wastewater treatment
systems showed noncompliance for various
parameters such as suspended solids, settle-
able solids, chorine residual, aluminum,
chromium, etc., in most cases, the wastewater
olants have met NPDES and state standards.
However, a treatment system to provide
neutralization of acidic coal pile runoff
is required to prevent pH violations under
NPDES permit No. TN 002950. This system is
scheduled for completion during FY'84. Also,
to meet NPDES requirements systems are being
orovided for the collection of lime sludges,
chromate discharge control, collection and
transport of nitrate wastes, acidic effluent
treatment, oil collection pits in storm
drains, rehabilitation of sanitary sewer
lines chromate sludge collection, neutral-
isation facility, uranium and transuranic
removal and a sludge treatment facility.
Ail items are planned for completion by
£y«87 Due to the extensive surface area
rii k-25, the existence of burial grounds,
°:d oossible areas of contamination from

soills and storage sites, consideration
Sust be given to the possibility of contam-

-------
Page 2

DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Plant (K-25)

inating storm water flows. Information is
needed on the location and characterization
of storm water outfalls and sediment trans-
port data especially with regard to the treat-
ment and holding ponds. The sanitary sewage
plant may receive some industrial wastes
and the NPDES permit was revised to include
the necessary parameters. The K-25 drinking
water plant is located on the Clinch River
about 4.5 miles downstream of the mouth of
White Oak Lake. The sediments of White Oak
Lake and Creek are known to contain consider-
able amounts of pollutants including radio-
active materials from operations and disposal
practices at ORNL. It is therefore likely
that water from the treatment plant and/or
sediments from the filter backwash contain
radioactive pollutants. The water and the
backwash lagoon sediments were checked to
determine the extent of contamination and
the permit was revised accordingly. Lab
wastes are presently discharged to a pond
at the front of the property. The TDHE
has suggested that a better way of handling
these wastes be devised and has suggested
batch treatment with the resulting sediments
being disposed of offsite at an approved
landfill* A master groundwater monitoring
urogram should be formulated with particular
attention being paid to known areas of
contamination such as old burial grounds.

orPA» The avstem does not meet accepted standards.
A waste oil storage facility is being con-
structed to provide for interim bulk storage
of waste oil and solvents that are contamin-
ated with uranium. The facility is necessary
to comply with 40 CPR 265* Ultimate disposal
will be by an incineration unit which is pres-
ently being built and scheduled for completion
in FY'84. An oil decontamination facility is
nlanned for FY 84 whereby enriched uranium
will be removed from waste oils and solvents
«o as to mitigate nuclear criticality concerns
•nrt thus allow for bulk storage and noncritica.
incineration. An incineratior with auxiliary
iSSJ£en£ for disposal of PCB and uranium
contaminated organic wastes is Planned for
completion in FY'86 to comply with the Toxic

-------
DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Plant (K-25)

CERCLA:

TOXICS:

Substances Control Act. A low level radio-
active waste facility is planned for
FY'86-87 for the treatment of solid and
liquid waste to meet the requirements of
proposed DOE order 05820, RCRA, and to meet
the intent of 40 CPR 61 (Class A waste).
Pond 1407B which receives wastewater from
the coal pile and the uranium decontamina-
tion facility and 1407C pond which contains
sediments from the 1407b pond should be
checked for RCRA wastes. Pond 1407C is not
lined and may leak. A plan for cleaning
out this pond has been developed.

A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was made
of the K-25 facility in July 13, 1983 by
the TDWM and EPA with guidance by K-25
personnel. There are three active and
three major inactive burial grounds on the
K-25 site. There are also several small
inactive sites. The active sites are (1)
the classified waste burial ground, (2)
contractors spoil area, (3) refuse glass
disposal area. The major inactive sites
include (1) Inactive scrap metal burial
site (2) radioactive burial site (3) class-
ified waste. The sites should be examined
for possible groundwater contamination, the
possibility of contaminated stormwater
runoff and for RCRA wastes, if the wastes
are found to be hazardous, a plan of dis-
posal must be developed.

PCB's and uranium are handled at the facil-
ity. See RCRA for method of disposal.

PROBLEM AREAS

.tb. Recent equipment replacements should correct
the problem with flouride.

vatfr• water and sediments in White Oak Creek are
* known to be contaminated with radioactive
materials. The source of the contamination
must be located and eliminated. Coal pile
runoff needs pH correction; the extent of
surface water and groundwater contamination

-------
Page 4

DOE Oak Ridge Gaseous Plant (K-25)

and eliminated. Coal pile runoff needs
pH correction; the extent of surface water
and groundwater contamination from burial
grounds, spills and dump sites needs to be
determined; and some treatment systems
need upgrading.

RCRA: The present system does not meet accepted
standards and needs revisions as outlined
under RCRA.

CERCLA: Suspected sites need detailed surveys to
determine whether hazardous materials are
present and the extent of groundwater and
surface water contamination. Where hazard-
ous materials are present, a plan of dis-
posal must be developed.

ACTION NEEDED

Obtain funds and completed planned facili-
ties. Clean up hazardous wastes as out-
lined.

CONTACT: Mike Travalini - FTS/626-0848

-------
DATE

June 30, 1984

NAME: DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

LOCATION: Oak Ridge, Tennessee

I.D.: TN890008981

MISSION: Producing nuclear weapons components; supporting
DOE weapons design laboratory; processing special
materials; supporting Oak Ridge and Paducah
installations; and, supporting other government

installations.

AREA: 5,460 acres

POPULATION: 6,629

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR* The facility is out of compliance with State and
Federal Air Standards. A bag house is being in-
stalled at the steam plant to control particu-
late matter. A Federal Facilities Compliance
Aareement was signed by DOE on April 14, 1982.
Final compliance is scheduled for boilers 1 and
2 in December 1984 and boilers 3 and 4 in De-
cember 1985. Sulfur dioxide is controlled by
coal sulfur content.

water- Out of compliance; discharges from Y-12 to East
WATER. out oi v CreeR an(J Bear Creek viQlate

Tennessee water quality standards. There is a
need for the reissuance of the NPDES permit to
Include all presently permitted as well as many
iinnermitted discharges. A memorandum of under-
ifandina (MOU) between the DOE, EPA, and the
JnHE was developed in May '83 to address com-
«??ance with pollution control standards at the
S ^facility. The MOU provides a plan of
action and strategy for gathering the necessary

which will aid in the development of
?!«norarv remedial measures and for the formu-
? ??«« 2e final plans for eliminating pollution
J ^ 5-12 Completion dates were set for all
pertinent If mi th. mo.t important are the

following*

1) The DOE submitted permit applications for
the steam plant, and cooling towers on December
15, 1983, and permit applications for area
sources and process sources February 15, 1984.
The DOE will submit final application infor-
mation on process discharges not requiring
treatment by April 1# 1984. 2) The DOE sub~
mitted a report to EPA and TDHE on July 1, 1983

-------
Page 2

DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

containing plans and specifications for th« war,

by-pass for use as spill prevention

The by-pass has been built. 3) The doe
a report on August 31, 1983 evain»nR submitted

ability and management practices for the n! Suifc"~
Sludge Disposal Area. However? adSition,fn ?°Pe
is still being collected. 4) The defied oh
ject objective of the MOU is to cease an 2«.
contributions, to the s-3 ponds, and to eliminate
the S-3 ponds as sources o£ contamination to
surface and groundwater. On September 1 iofti
DOE submitted a closeout proDosal whJt> / ,83'
plans and specifications LT	n ~ " ei

schedule. Upon elimination of the s-3
the DOE agrees to submit a plan and schedule
for rehabilitation of Upper Bear Creek si
Based on the review of data concerninc'the
Burial Ground Oil Pond, the DOE plans for fh-
elimination of the sources of pollution to the
pond and ultimate cleanup and closure of the
pond. 6) Isolation area - The DOE submitted
EPA and the TDHE a schedule for closure /in-
eluding plans for alternate disposal) on
November 1, 1983. 7) Oil Land Farm - The DOE
submitted to EPA and TDHE on January 31 1984
a report that included an inventory of e*f
contamination. The DOE plans to eliminate the
discharge. 8) East Fork Poplar Creek and Bear
Creek - A Task Force was established by EPA
DOE and TDHE to study the contamination and'
formulate a remedial plan for cleaning up the
two creek watersheds. 9) Groundwater Study for
Y-12 Facility - A limited groundwater study
investigating the hydrologic characteristics of
Bear Creek Valley disposal areas including the
isolation area, disposal pits, oil pond and
trenches and oil landfarm, the S-3 ponds, the
New Hope Pond sludge disposal basin, was sub-
mitted on December 30, 1983. The agencies are
discussing the conclusions. The DOE has sub-
mitted to TDHE and EPA a master monitoring plan
for groundwaters and surface waters of the
entire Y-12 facility which indicated all present
sampling locations and all parameters analyzed.
Temporary treatment measures have been instituted
at the Y-12 facility to treat wastes, a new
industrial wastewater treatment facility is
required at Y-12 to meet water quality standards.
Some wastewater is temporarily being treated at
the K-25 treatment plant. It is expected that the
final dates required for construction of the
treatment plant will be incorporated in a Federal

-------
Page 3

Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

Facilities Compliance Agreement executed bv EPA
and the DOE.

RCRA: The facility is in compliance with EPA hazardous
waste regulations until it is issued or denied
a full RCRA permit. Part A is on file. The
facility has been inspected by the state. However,
the facility has many sites which do not presently'
meet accepted RCRA standards. EPA has delegated
to the state the authority for Phase I. The
February 27, 1984 EPA/DOE MOU prevents the state
from taking actions under RCRA. The DOE plans
to provide a central location for disposal of
hazardous waste for the Oak Ridge facilities.
A notice of intent for an EIS has been announced.
Facilities are planned for the storage of oil
contaminated with toxic or radioactive substances,
however, money has not yet been appropriated. A
compliance evaluation inspection made by the TDHE
on February 23, 1983, identified several potential
sites which are under investigation. The sites
being studied are as follows:

1)	New Hope Pond (N.H.P.)

2)	Disposal area for NHP on Chestnut Ridge

3)	S-3 ponds

4)	"Isolation Area," "Disposal Pits," and "Oil
Land Farm"

5)	East Fork Poplar Creek, Bear Creek, and bank
areas along EFPC and other areas where
excavated materials may have been placed.

6)	Ditch leading to NHP and adjacent grounds.

7)	Groundwater adjacent to these disposal sites.

PCB contaminated oils and solvents were general-
ly disposed of in earth trenches by ground
burial. After is was discovered that there was
seepage from the trenches to Bear Creek, a pond
was built to intercept the waste. The RCRA
staff believe this would be a hazardous waste
impoundment and would be technically reviewed
per the.February 27, 1984 MOU.

CERCLAx East Fork Poplar Creek and its banks in some

areas and New Hope Pond are known to be heavily
contaminated with mercury. Bear Creek also is
contaminated with mercury but to a lesser
extent. Also, Bear Creek and East Fork Poplar
Creek are suspected of having received unknown
quantities of plutonium, lead, uranium, thorium,
berrylliumr and polychlorinated biphenyls and

-------
Page 4

DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

biphenyls and may be contaminated with these
materials. Tests are being conducted to deter-
mine the degree of contamination and the remedial
measure necessary for cleaning up the areas.

Also, if testing shows that the sludge placed
in the disposal site on Chestnut Ridge is
hazardous, appropriate remedial actions under
CERCLA and closure under RCRA technical require-
ments will be required. The S-3 ponds are
unlined and serve as holding and treatment ponds
for plating sludges, acids, stripping and cleaning
solutions, solvents, etc. The ponds are being
closed out and the remaining hazardous wastes
will be subject to appropriate remedial action
under CERCLA and proper closure under RCRA tephni-
cal requirements. The new industrial waste
treatment system will replace the ponds, the DOE
has awarded a contract to investigate the hydro-
logic characteristics of the Bear Creek Valley
disposal areas (isolation area, disposal pits, oil
pond and trenches and oil landfarm), the S-3 ponds
and the New Hope pond sludge disposal basin. The
results of this investigation will provide informa-
tion to assess site conditions, determine if
significant contamination to the groundwater has
resulted from operations, and assess the need and
feasibility of corrective measures.

PROBLEM AREAS

The main problem areas are as follows:

1.	The need for reissuance of NPDES permits to
include all presently permitted as well as unper-
mitted discharges to East Pork Poplar Creek and
Bear Creek.

2.	Mercury contamination of East Pork Poplar
Creek and Bear Creek including banks and flood-
plain along EFPC. Also, possible contamination
with other elements including Pb, U, Th, Be,
and PCB's. 3. Mercury contamination in New
Hope Pond, also, other pollutants. 4. Sludge
disposal area on Chestnut Ridge investigation
of possible groundwater contamination, also,
determination if wastes are hazardous. 5.
Discharges to S-3 ponds and potential contamin-
ation of ground and surface water from these
ponds.

-------
Page 5
DOE Oak

ACTION

-------
Page 6

DOE Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant

(6)	PCB's and PCB contaminated oils and materials
deposited in the "Isolation Areas, "Disposal Pita"
and "Oil Farm Area" must be deposed of in accordance
with PCB regulations under TSCA. The other waste
materials which are hazardous wastes must be
disposed of in accordance with the requirements of
the interception pond as a pollution source.

(7)	Construct the necessary storage areas for
handling hazardous wastes. Determine extent of
groundwater contamination. Take necessary remedial
measures.

(8)	Determine extent of radioactive discharges
and impact. Take remedial measures as required

(9)	An NPDES permit for K-25 has been issued to
accommodate Y-12 wastewater as an interim procedure

CONTACT: Mike Travalini - FTS/676-0848

-------
DATE:

June 30, 1984

NAME: DOE Clinch River Breeder Reactor (CRBR)

LOCATION:
MISSION:

Oak Ridge, Tennessee

The project is to demonstrate the feasibility
and practicability of a liquid metal Fast
Breeder Reactor Program. The goal of the
breeder program is to ensure that a proven
long-term electricity supply option is avail-
able on a prudent time scale.

AREA: 1,364 acres - Clinch River Consolidated Indus-
trial Park - 112.

POPULATION:

300 when in operation - present construction
crew 375.

COMPLIANCE STATUS

AIR:

WATER:

RCRA:
CERCLA:

TOXICS:

In compliance but funding has been terminated
except for clean up operations. Air pollut-
ants from grading operations is the only
problem remaining.

In compliance. An NPDES permit was issued by
EPA to control the discharge from the Reactor
and to control turbidity and solids in the
Clinch River resulting from erosion of soils
due to grading operations in site preparation,
Treatment ponds with sand filter dikes were
constructed to remove solids from runoff and
from gravel and truck washing. These facil-
ities will be used for grading and clean up

operations.

No RCRA problems with clean up of site.

No hazardous waste sites are known to exist
in the project area.

No problems involving toxics in clean up.

... ,

PROBLEM AREAS On November 1, 1983 the CRBRP was ordered to

close down operation. Congress failed to
provide a funding bill for its continued
construction causing termination of facilitv
construction. Presently, the only problem
remaining is to regrade the site and vegetate
it so that water quality standards are not

violated.

ACTION

CONTACT:

~ * w • —	

The site needs to be regraded and seeded in
such a manner that it will not erode and

Jerry Wing - (615) 455-2611 - Ext.

5332

-------