ENVIRONMENTAL
JUSTICE
SMALL GRANTS
WORKSHOP
October 30-31, 1997
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
-------
'* ' svt
IWfJ
p*iv u
GAIL C. BRUBAKER
Director of Finance and Administration '
Environmental Hazards Assessment Progra
Medical University of South Carolina
m
171 Ashley Avenue
(803) 727-6439 Charleston, SC 29425-8010
(803) 727-6464 1-AX brubakeg@musc.edu
BERNADETTE HUDNELL, Ph.D.
Environmental Resource
Specialist
ov.,.,, 601-650-7313
/ v \
Department of Natural Resources
Office of Economic Development
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
P.O. Box 6013 • Philadelphia, MS 39350
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB 1 - Workshop Agenda
Listing of Workshop Participants
EPA Contacts on Grants & Financial Matters
TAB 2 - Organization Charts of Region IV
Executive Order No. 12898 - Federal Action to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
Nationwide List of 1997 EJ Small Grant Recipients
EPA's Environmental Justice Bibliography
Summary of Community Grant Programs in Region IV
EPA Guide to Federal Grant Resources for Community
Organizations, Tribal Organizations and Tribal
Governments (Prepared by Region VIII-Denver Colorado)
TAB 3 - Handout Material - Grants Administration
TAB 4 - Handout Material - Financial Management
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SMALL GRANTS WORKSHOP
October 30-31, 1997
Atlanta Federal Center
Conference Center D
Thursday. October 30. 1997
1:00 - Welcome & Introductions - JoBrown & Connie Raines
1:45 - Opening Remarks - Phyllis Harris
Regional Counsel & Director,
Environmental Accountability Division
2:00 - Overview of EPA programs and operations - Eddie Wright
Natalie Elington
2:15 - 2:45 - History of EJ program & regional vision - Connie
Raines/Kathleen Curry
2:45 - 3:00 - Break
3:00 - EJ Grants Program - Mary Settle
National EJ Small Grants Manager
Office of Environmental Justice
EPA Headquarters
...History, successes, Inspector General's audit findings,
future directions.
3:30 - Panel Discussion - Sharing Experiences
Moderator - Brian Holtclaw
Frances Henderson - Vanderbilt Univ.
Daisy Carter - Project Awake
Marvin Crafter - Hunt Educ. Center
Dean Canty - Catawba Indian Nation
James Branson - Appalshop, Inc.
4:15 - Brainstorm Session to identify grants/financial mgmt.
issues for discussion on 10/31
4:30 - Adjourn
-------
-2-
Fridav. October 31. 1997
8:45 - Introductions of Grants & Finance Staff - JoBrown
9:00 - Opening Remarks - Matt Robbins
Chief, Grants & Contract Branch
9:30 - 11:30 - The Grants Process
...Application Phase - Jo Brown
(Processes utilized in Region 4)
...Pre-Award Phase - Jo Brown
...Award Phase - Ethelreen -W411ianiB
... Post-Award Phase -
...Payments - Andrew Dunn & Stephanie Lankford
...Changes - Jo Brown
...Monitoring - Jo Brown
...Closeouts
...Roles and responsibilities of grantee, Project
Officer, Finance and Grants Staffs - Brenda Banks &
Betty Miller
...Financial Status Reports - Bill Rogers
...Audits
...The process, roles and responsibilities of
Inspector General and Grantees - Bill Rogers
...Q & A
11:45 ...Wrap-UP (Evaluation)
Noon ...Adjourn
-------
w v>
-------
E. J SMALL GRANTS WORKSHOP
ATTENDEES
Frances Henderson
Vanderbilt University Medical
School
Nashville, TN
F-615-343-0325
615-322-4179
Marvin Crafter
Hunt Educational & Cultural
Center
Fort Valley, GA
Daisy Carter
Project Awake
Coatopa, AL
Dr. Mildred McClain
Citizens for Environmental
Justice
Savannah, GA
F-912-822-9444
912-822-9714
F-205-652-4320
205-652-6823
F-912-233-5105
912-233-0907
Dean Canty
Catawba Indian Nation
Catawba, SC
F-803-366-8380
803-366-4792 x-232
Dani Johnson
Lawrence County School System
Lawrence, TN
F-931-762-7299
931-762-8102
Leslie Thornton
University of NC-Asheville
Asheville, NC 28804
F-704-251-6900
704-251-6104
Dr. Padma Uppala
Oakwood College
Huntsville, AL
F-205-726-7470
205-726-7493
Mr. Mark Keating
NC Cooperative Extension
Service
Northampton, NC
F-919-534-1827
919-534-2711
James Branson
Appalshop, Inc.
Whitesburg, KY
F-606-633-1009
606-633-0108/3486
-------
-2-
Rev. John E. Terrell
Concerned Citizens League of
America
Brandon, FL
Dr. Frank Ekpo
Bethune-Cookman College
Daytona Beach, FL
Dr. Burnadett Hudnell
Phillipin American Association
of Central Mississippi
Philadelphia, MS
Brenda J. Mi11saps
Emma Wheeler Homes Resident
Assoc., Inc.
Chat t anooga, TN
Ms. Debra Matthews
Alton Park/Piney Woods
Improvement, Corp.
Cha11 anooga, TN
Jackie B. Ward
Southern Organizing Committee
Atlanta, GA
Charles Utley
Hyde Park & Aragon Park Improvement
Committee
Augusta, GA
Roy C. Smith
Congaree Community Association
Hopkins, SC
Ms. Gail Brubaker
Medical University of SC
Charleston, SC
F-813-661-7567
813-685-7917
F-904-239-8316
904-255-1401, x-532
F-601-656-8510
601-650-7313
F-423-821-3283
423-821-1299
F-423-265-3347
423-266-2751
F-404-755-0575
404-755-2855
F- 706-798-7833
706-592-3988/3987
F-803-776-5586
803-776-5295
Susan Phaelan
Oakwood College
Huntsville, AL
-------
H
O
n
£
-------
WHO TO CALL??
GRANTS MATTERS:
Josephine Brown Environmental Justice Project Officer 404-562-9672
FAX- 404-562-9664
Ethelreen Murdix Grants Specialist 404-562-8426
Alicia Thomas E J Grants Project Officer- Waste Division 404-562-9672
FINANCE for PAYMENTS
404-562-8200
Fax- 404-562-8246
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Charles Walker
Andrew Dunn
Betty Miller-Barnard
Kristy Dickens
LaWanda Watts
Marie Wright
Lisa Henry
Judy McCIain
CLOSE OUT and FSR:
Ethelreen Murdix
Grants Specialists
404-562-8426
-------
TYPES OF AUDITS
• Internal
Audits
• External
Audits
VIEWGRAPH # 2
TITLE: Types of Audits
KEY POINTS:
Internal audits are performance audits that examine the
programs or operations of Federal agencies. (However, as
part of an internal audit, State agencies or assistance recipients
may be evaluated to provide further information about the
performance of a Federal agency.) Internal audits are used to
test the adequacy of an organization's regulatory compliance
and financial reporting. Additionally, they are used to test the
effectiveness of its resource management, operating
procedures, program results, and financial operations. Internal
audits may evaluate the entire organization or only one or two of
an organization's programs or operations. Internal audits of EPA
are conducted by the U.S. General Accounting Offi.ce (GAO) or
EPA's Office of the Inspector General (EPA OIG).
External audits are audits that examine a Federal agency's
assistance recipients. These audits are conducted by the EPA
OIG or its contractor, or, in the case of Single Audits, by the
recipient. They may be performed before, during, or after the
completion of a project. Examples of external audits include
single audits, pre-award audits, interim and final cost audits, and
indirect cost audits.
Single audits are financial and compliance audits of State
and local governments or universities and nonprofits that
are performed in accordance with OMB Circular A-128 (for
States, local governments, and Indian tribes), or OMB
Circular A-133 (for universities and other nonprofits). The
cost of a Single Audit is an allowable cost. Applicants
should either include audit costs in their indirect cost
rate or, if the cost is not included in the indirect cost
rate, as a direct cost to the grant.
10/1/96
7.2
-------
o
£
P
H I
H
-------
U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency
Region 04 - Atlanta, GA
-------
February 1997
U. S. Environmental 1| jn Agency - Region 04
100 Alabama Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303
Fax 404-562-8340
Office of Congressional
Affairs
Marilyn Allen (Acting)
404-562-8327
Regional Administrator
John H. Hankinson, Jr.
A. Stanley Meiburg (Deputy)
404-562-8357
Office of Public Affairs
Thomas Moore (Acting)
404-562-8344
Environmental Accountability
Division
Phyllis Harris
404-562-9655
Waste Management Division
Richard D. Green (Acting)
404-562-8651
Science and Ecosystem Support
Division
Russell Wright, Jr.
706-355-8500
Office of Policy & Management
Michael V. Peyton
404-562-8295
Water Management Division
Mike McGhee
404-562-9345
Air, Pesticides, Toxics
Management Division
Winston A. Smith
404-562-9077
-------
U.^K^roamental
Protection Agency
Region 04
February 1997
Office of Policy Management
404-562-8295
wmmmRmmm
Science & Ecosystem Support
Division
706-355-8500
Waste Management Division
404-562-8651
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
562-9099
RCRA Programs Branch 562-8440
Federal Facilities Branch 562-8458
Emergency Response & Removal Branch
562-8721
North Site Management Branch
562-8790
South Site Management Branch
562-8789
Regional Administrator
404-562-8357
Air, Pesticides, Toxics
Management Division
404-562-9077
> Air Planning Branch 404-562-9077
> Air & Radiation Technology Branch
562-9205
Pesticides & Toxic Substances Branch
562-8956
> Air & EPCRA Enforcement Branch
562-9155
Water Management Division
404-562-9345
* Geographic Planning & Technical Support
Branch 562-8566
Water Programs Enforcement Branch
562-8568
^ Surface Water Permits & Facilities Branch
562-8567
*>¦ Ground Water Drinking Branch 562-8515
>¦ Wetlands, Coastal & Water Quality Grants
Branch 562-85,67
Office of Congressional
Affairs
404-562-8327
Office of Public Affairs
404-562-8327
Environmental Accountability
Division
404-562-9655
> Office of General Counsel 562-9655
» Environmental Justice &
Community Liaison 562-9671
> Associate Director for Legal Support
562-9488 '
>• Associate Director for Technical
Support 562-9590
-------
Ft Ul uary 1997
Office of Congressional Affairs & Office of Public Affairs
Regional Administrator
John H. Hankinson, Jr.
404-562-8357
Office of Congressional
Affairs
Marilyn Allen (Acting)
404-562-8327
FAX 404-562-8335
Office of Public Affairs
Thomas Moore
(Acting)
404-562-8327
Press & Information Staff
Hagan Thompson
404-562-8327
FAX 404-562-8335
-------
February 1997
Office of Policy & Management
Information Management
Branch
Ron Barrow
404-562-8070
FAX 404-562-8052
GIS & Information Resources
Section
jffr-i'&fyjYi
Human Resources
Management Branch
404-562-8182
FAX 404-562-8152
Michael V. Peyton, Director
G. Alan Farmer, Deputy
404-562-8295
FAX 404-562-8300
EEO Officer
Rafael Santamaria'
404-562-8312
> f hrifS^VKVf> ^ ^ iY?M vKif va hvirWcVJ-fi
Facilities Management Section
>¦ Labor, Employee Relations &
Training Section
Planning & Analysis Branch
Cory W. Berish
404-562-8270
FAX 404-562-8269
Comptroller Branch
Janice Bramlett
404-562-8200
FAX 404-562-8210
>* Financial Management Section
Superfund Cost Recovery Section
*• Budget Operations & Reporting
Section
Grants & Procurement Branch
Matthew J. Robbins
404-562-8400
FAX 404-562-8413
>¦ Grants, IAG,& Audit
Management Section
Procurement Section
-------
Febri , £997
Water Management Division
Division'Director
MikeMcGhee
Beverly Banister, Deputy
404-562-9345
FAX 404-562-9318
Geographic Planning &
Technical Support Branch
Gail M. Vanderhoogt
404-562-9250
FAX 404-562-9224
> Geographic Planning & WQS Section
>- Technical Support Section
South Florida
Office
Richard Harvey
561-802-3153
Water Programs
Enforcement Branch
Mary Kay Lynch
404-562-9724
FAX 404-562-9728
Clean Water Act Enforcement Section
>*¦ SDWA Enforcement Section
Surface Water Permits &
A
i
Wetlands, Coastal, & Water
1
Ground Water/Drinking J
Facilities Branch
Quality Grants Branch
Water Branch J
Doug Mundrick
Tom Welborn
E. Stallings Howell |
404-562-9280
|
404-562-9355
404-562-9424 j
FAX 404-562-8692
FAX 404-562-9354
FAX 404-562-9329 1
i
y~ Surface Water Permits Section
> Wetlands Section
9
UST Section
t*- Construction Grants & SFR Loan Section
» Coastal Programs & Surface Water
Drinking Water Section
Quality Grafts Section
^ Ground Water Section
-------
February 1997
Waste Management Division
Office of Customer
Service
R OSAty//-J^/ZCcC/d
Division Director
Richard D. Green (Acting)
404-562-8651
Jewell Harper, Deputy
404-562-9170
FAX 404-562-8627
Enforcement &
Compliance Branch
Jewell Grubbs
404-562-9099
RCRA Programs
Branch
Narindar Kumar
404-562-8440
Office of Technical
Service
Elmer Akin
404-562-8634
Federal Facilities Branch
Jon Johnston
404-562-8458
Emergency Response
& Removal Branch
Doug Lair
404-562-8721
> North Enforcement &
Compliance Section
>¦ South Enforcement &
Compliance Section
** North Programs Section
»• South Programs Section
>~RCRA Services Section
»*DOE Section
*DOD Section
Emergency Response Oil Section
>* Removal Operation Section
Removal Management Section
-------
February 1997
Waste Management Division (Continued)
North Site
Management Branch
Robert Jourdan
404-562-8790
?i
South Site Management
Branch
Curt Fehn
404-562-8789
l
Program Services
Branch
Franklin Hill
404-562-8844
*- Section A
>• Section B
>• Section C
Section A
>¦ Section B
>* Section C
Information & State Programs
Section
Cost Recovery Section
-------
February 1997
Office of Quality
Assurance
Gary K. Bennett
706-355-8550
FAX 706-355-8803
kCdtisiiicSj
Science & Ecosystem Support Division
Russell L. Wright
Director
Allan £. Antley,
Deputy
706-355-8500
FAX 706-355-8508
960 College Station Rd.
Athens, GA 30605-2700
Office of Program &
Technical Operations
Betty Kinney
706-355-8511
Analytical Support Branch
Charles H. Hooper
706-355-8838
FAX 706-355-8803
rM'Titliiiii
Enforcement &
Investigations Branch
William R. Bokey
706-355-8604
FAX 706-355-8744
Ecological Assessment
Branch
Vacant
p~ Inorganic Chemistry Section
Organic Chemistry Section
»• Hazardous Waste Section
> Air & Water Enforcement Section
I
>*- Ecological Evaluation Section
-------
February 1997
Air Pesticides & Toxics Management
Division
Air & Radiation Technology
Branch
R. Douglas Neeley
404-562-5105
FAX 404-562-9095
Radiation & Indoor Air Section
*- Operating Source Section
Preconstruction/HAP Section
Air & GPCRA Enforcement
Branch
Beverly A. Spagg
404-562-9155
FAX 404-562-9163
Winston A. Smith, Director
James S. Kutzman, Deputy
404-562-9077
FAX 404-562-9066
*- Air Enforcement Section
EPCRA Enforcement Section
Air Planning Branch
Linda Anderson-Carnahan
404-562-9055
FAX 404-562-9019
Regulatory Planning Section
** Mobile Source & Community
Planning Section
Pesticides & Toxic Substances
Branch
Carol L. Kemker
404-562-8956
FAX 404-562-8972
Pesticides Section
*• Toxic Substances Section
-------
February 1997 Environmental Accountability Division
Office of General
Counsel
Phyllis Harris, Director
404-562-9655
FAX 404-562-9663
Associate Division Director
for Legal Support
William D, Anderson
404-562-9488
FAX 404-562-9486
Office of Water
Legal Support
Mary J. Wilkes
404-562-9488
FAX 404-562-9664
Office of Air/Toxic
General Law
Legal Support
Nancy L. Tommelleo
404-562-9571
FAX 404-562-9664
Office ofRCRA
Federal Facilities
Legal Support
Valeria A Heard
404-562-9521
FAX 404-562-9664
Office of Enforcement &
Compliance Assurance
Environmental Justice and
Community Liaisoi.
Connie S. Raines (Acting)
404-562-9671
FAX 404-562-9664
Associate Division Director
for Technical Support
Bruce P. Miller
404-562-9590
FAX 404-562-9598
Office of CERCLA
Legal Support
William B. Bush, Jr.
404-562-9538
FAX 404-562-9486
Office of CERCLA
Legal Support
Richard Leahy
404-562-9573
FAX 404-562-9664
Office of Environmental
Assessment
Heinz J. Mueller
404-562-9611
FAX 404-562-9486
Accountability Management
Branch
James S. Gordon
404-562-9616
FAX 404-562-9486
-------
5?
O
N>
00
\D
00
-------
Executive Order No. 12898
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1 -1. Implementation
1-101. Agency Responsibilities.
To the greatest extend practicable and permitted by law, and consistent
with the principles set forth in the report on the National Performance
Review, each Federal agency shall make achieving, environmental justice
part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects
of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-
income populations in the United States and its territories and possessions,
the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the
Commonwealth of die Mariana Islands.
1 -102. Creadon ofan Interagency Woritng Group on Eminrnmetaal Jus/ire.
(a) Within 3 months of the date of this order, the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency ("Administrator") or the Administrator's
designee shall convene an interagency Federal Working Group on
Environmental justice ("Working Group"). The Working Group shall
comprise the heads of the following executive agencies and offices or their
designees: (a) Department of Defense; (b) Department of Health and Human
Services; (c) Department of Housing and Urban Development;
-------
Executive Order No. 12898
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Bv the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
strategies in section 1-103 of this order, each Federal agency, whenever
practicable and appropriate, shall collect, maintain and analyze information
on the race, national origin, income level and other readily accessible and
appropriate information for areas surrounding facilities or sices expected to
have a substantial environmental human health or economic effect on the
surrounding populations, when such facilities or sites become the subject of
a substantial Federal environmental administrative or judicial action. Such
information shall be made available to the public, unless prohibited bv lan-,
and
(c) Each Federal agency, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect,
maintain, and analyze information on the race, national origjn, income level
and other readily accessible and appropriate information for areas surrounding
Federal facilities that are; (1) subject to the reporting requirements under
the Emergency P and Community Right-to-Know Act. 42 U.S.C- section
11001-11050 as mandated in Executive Order No. 12856; and (2) expected
co have a substantial environmental, human health, or economic effect on
surrounding populations. Such information shall be made available to the
public, unless prohibited by law.
(d) In carrying out the responsibilities in this section, each Federal agency,
whenever practicable and appropriate, shall share information and eliminate
unnecessary duplication of efforts through the use of existing data systems
and cooperative agreements among Federal agencies and with Scare, local
and tribal governments.
Section 4-4. Subsistence Consumption of Fish and Wildlife
4-401. Consumption Patterns.
In order to assist in identifying the need for ensuring protection of
populations with differential patterns of subsistence consumption of fish and
wildlife. Federal agencies, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall collect
maintain, and analyze information on the consumption patterns of populations
who principally rely on fish and/or wildlife for subsistence. Federal agencies
shall communicate to the public the risks of those consumption patterns.
4-402. Guidance.
Federal agencies, whenever practicable and appropriate, shall work in a
coordinated manner to publish guidance reflecting the latest scientific
information available concerning methods for evaluating the human health
risks associated with the consumption of pollutant-bearing fish or wildlife.
Agencies shall consider such guidance in developing their policies and rules.
Section 5-5. Public Participation and Access to Information
(a) The public may submit recommendations to Federal agencies relating
to the incorporation of environmental justice principles into Federal agency
programs or policies. Each Federal agency shall convey such recommendations
to the Working Group.
(b) Each Federal agency may, whenever practicable and appropriate,
translate crucial public documents, notices, and hearings relating to human
health or the environment for limited English speaking populations.
(c) Each Federal agency shall work to ensure that public documencs,
notices, and hearings relating to human health or the environment are
concise, understandable, and readily accessible to the public.
(d) The Working Group shall hold public meetings, as appropriate, for the
purpose of fact-finding, receiving public comments, and conducting inquiries
concerning environmental justice. The Working Group shall prepare for
public review a summary of the comments and recommendations discussed
at the public meetings.
Section 6*6. General Provisions
6-601. Responsibility for Agency Implementation.
The head of each Federal agency shall be responsible for ensuring
compliance with this order. Each Federal agency shall conduct incemal
reviews and take such other steps as may be necessary co monitor compliance
with this order.
6-602. Executive Order So. 12250.
This Executive order is intended to supplement but not supersede
Executive Order No. 122S0, which requires consistent and effective
implementation of various laws prohibiting discriminatory practices in
programs receiving Federal financial assistance. Nothing herein shall limit
the effect or mandate of Executive Order No. 12250.
6-603. Extatthe Order No. 12815.
This Executive order is not intended co limit the effect or mandate of
Executive Order No. 12875.
6-604. Scope.
For purposes of this order; Federal agency means any agency on the
Working group, and such other agencies as may be designated by the
President, that conducts any Federal program or activity that substantially
affects human health or the environment. Independent agencies are requested
to comply with the provisions of this order.
6-605. Petitions for Exemptions.
The head of a Federal agency may petition the President for an exemption
from the requirements of this order on the grounds that all or some of the
petitioning agency's programs, or activities should not be subject to che
requirements of this order.
6-606. Native American Programs.
Each Federal agency responsibility set forth under this order shall apply
equally to Native American programs. Io addition, the Department of che
Interior, in coordination with the Working Group, and, after consultation
with tribal leaders, shall coordinate steps to be taken pursuant to this order
that address Federally recognized Indian Tribes.
6-607. Costs.
Unless otherwise provided by law, Federal agencies shall assume che send
costs of complying with this order.
6-605. General.
Federal agencies shall implemenc this order consistent wich, and to che
extent permitted by, existing law.
6-609. Judicial Reviea.
This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the
executive branch and is not intended to, nor does it create any right, benefit,
or trust responsibility; substantive or procedural enforceable at law or equity
by a party against che United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.
This order shall not be construed to create any right to judicial review-
involving the compliance or noncompliance of the U nited States, its agencies,
its officers, or any other person wich this order.
William J. Clinton
The White House
U February 1994
President Clinton signed an Executive Order on Environmental Justice on
February 11, 1994.
Environmental Justice at Home and Abroad 9
-------
VO
vo
§
a
H
T
h-
ff
2
-------
1
Office of Environmental Justice Small Grants Program
FY 97 Award Recipients
Region I
For more information, please contact Region I Environmental Justice
Coordinator, Rhona Julien at 617-565-9454
Vermont
Vermont Institute for Environmental Health
$14,015
Vermont Institute for Environmental Health is a non profit organization that brings together
individuals with significant background and experience in grassroots organizing, policy and
science that will be directed to issues of environmental health and indoor air quality. This project
will allow this organization to build a strong indoor air quality coalition and address the health
effects of indoor air pollution and low level chemical exposures in schools and outdoor
environments.
New Hampshire
NH Coalition for Safety and Health $20,000
New Hampshire Coalition for Safety and Health is a non-profit, worker-centered educational and
advocacy organization devoted to improving workplace health and safety in New Hampshire.
This project will set up a training program that is diversified but focused to facilitate worker and
community awareness of potential health and safety threats to the employees and the community.
Rhode Island
Roger Williams Zoo $17,240
Roger Williams Zoo Docent Council serves as an educational arm of the Zoo and has been in
existence since 1975. The purpose of this project is to take teens to a new level of involvement
with Environmental Justice issues. The youth will actually get involved in collecting the data used
to make informed decisions and foster community change.
Olneyville Housing Corporation $20,000
Olneyville Housing Corporation is a non profit community based organization incorporated in
1989. Its' primary purpose for forming was to address the problems associated with an aging
housing stock, decline in owner-occupation, low income and often disenfranchised residents, and
other manifestations of a neighborhood in decline. This project will improve communication and
coordination among teenagers and community groups by providing learning opportunities about
risk reduction and pollution prevention to teens and younger children through summer programs.
Connecticut
-------
2
New Haven Land Trust, Inc. $20,000
The Urban Community Garden Project started in 1991, providing assistance to the establishment
and success of over 50 community gardens in low-income neighborhoods throughout New
Haven. The program will provide an extensive gardening program, consisting of training,
planting, pest control, and garden maintenance. The program will also conduct workshops in
compost and food preservation.
ONE CHANE, Inc.
$20,000
Membership in ONE/CHANE, Inc. is comprised of residents from the two poorest neighborhoods
in the city. The mission of this organization is to "Rebuild North Hartford" and develop and
provide training to residents to conduct health assessments in the neighborhoods adjacent to the
North Meadows landfill. The organization will conduct GIS Environmental Risk Mapping of 100
blocks to identify potential environmental risks and hazards.
New Haven Ecology Project, Inc. $20,000
Since 1991, the New Haven Ecology Project has developed programs for inner-city youth that
teach about the environment, food systems, and natural ecosystems. The purpose of this program
is to provide Adult Workshop Series for residents to target environmental and health concerns.
Massachusetts
NE Aquarium Corp/Education Department $19,958
This organization is in partnership with Coastal America and Boston Public Schools. Since 1987,
the Aquarium's Teacher Resource Center has focused on helping nurture teachers' ability to
incorporate aquatic environmental science issues into their classrooms. This project will develop
a cadre of middle school science teachers who are enabled to educate Boston's school children
about the unique environmental resources of Boston Harbor and the Harbor Islands, to support
teachers long-term professional development and access to environmental education resources in
support of science and environmental education reform initiatives, and to strengthen the
partnerships among NEAC, Coastal America and the Boston Public Schools.
Committee for Boston Public Housing, Inc. $20,000
CBPH was founded in 1981 and in 1984 created the Family-Community Resource Center to help
tenants assess social services and assemble resources to meet the needs in innovative ways.
This project will facilitate communication and information exchange and create partnerships
among stakeholders to address disproportionate, high and adverse environmental exposure.
It will also build community capacity to identify local environmental justice problems and involve
the community in the design and implementation of activities to address these concerns.
-------
3
Baystate Medical Center, Inc.
$20,000
Baystate Medical Center is non-profit and the Baystate Medical Center Children's Hospital is a
hospital within a hospital and has the largest outpatient pediatric Medicaid primary care practice
in Massachusetts. This proposal expands the focus of the SafeKids Coalition and will build on the
current Lead Task Force facilitated by the MA Department of Public Health and the broader
constituency of the Western Massachusetts SafeKids Coalition in order to strengthen partnerships
and communication. It will also provide Focus groups of community members who will be used
to develop the 'train the trainer' curriculum and awareness events. Surveys of participants will be
used before and after interventions to measure attitudes and beliefs about lead and carbon
monoxide poisoning.
Mass Health Research Institute, Inc. $19,998
Mass Health Research Institute is a private, non-profit organization founded in 1959 whose
primary mission is to assist public and private agencies, institutions and other organizations in
conducting research, demonstration and training projects for the public benefit. This project will
identify community needs and communication barriers to address public health risks by
coordinating, developing and disseminating resources and and implementing education plans for
Chinatown Communities.
ACE $20,000
(RA's discretionary
Fund)
Neighborhoods Against Urban Pollution (NAUP) is a collaborative effort of six Boston-based
neighborhood organizations and environmental non profits. NAUP was conceived to foster
resident mobilization as it relates to environmental problem solving. The project will improve its
neighborhood mapping and risk assessment methodology through an intensive partnership with
Egleston Square Neighborhood Association (ESNA). Assist 4 to 6 neighborhoods to implement
this improved model. ACE and ESNA will use GIS software to facilitate the neighborhood
mapping process and train residents to collect and interpret existing environmental data.
Jobs & Environment Campaign $19,955
This organization strives for economic and environmental justice and blend local action with
technical expertise in a nationwide effort to create sustainable communities that are more
prosperous, environmentally sound and socially just. This project will generate and enhance
communities' understanding of environmental and public health information as well as build
capacity to identify local environmental justice problems with community members to develop
survey and testing methodologies and identify mitigation strategies.
-------
4
Lawrence Grassroots, Initiative, Inc
$15,000*
This organization develops and sustains projects to mitigate issues of social, economic and
environmental justice in the City of Lawrence. This project will educate residents and businesses
of Lawrence, MA about toxics and hazardous substances in their community and create a
permanent, community-based local environmental justice council to promote citizen participation
in pollution prevention projects and environmental justice issues. Lawrence Grassroots will
partner with John Snow Institute for this effort.
Jobs for Youth $20,000*
Jobs For Youth (JFY), a non profit Community Based Organization, mission is to afford
economic development through job training. JFY targets low income, non-college educated
adults who live primarily in neighborhoods of Boston and who are unemployed or
underemployed. This project will provide these participants with the necessary skills to enter the
environmental services field, e.g. conduct training related to the detection, assessment and
evaluation of risks and human health effects from exposure to hazardous substances. Also
contribute to building a base of indigenous professional expertise within communities
disproportionately affected by environmental hazards.
The Passamaquoddy tribe is an indigenous Native American Tribe of eastern Maine/Maritime
Canada. The Pleasant Point Reservation is located in the most easterly region of the United
States. The Tribe depends on the estuarine and marine waters of the St Croix estuary,
Passamaquoddy Bay and Cobscook Bay to provide resources for the safe sustenance of present
and future generations. This project has a two pronged approach consisting of a toxics
monitoring program and a water quality program. Under the toxic monitoring program, marine
organisms will be tested for heavy metals and dioxin. The water quality program will consist of
sample collection and analysis for fecal coliform bacteria in closed shell fish.
Passamaquoddy Tribe - Indian Township $15,000*
This project is primarily research-oriented and specific to the problem of hazardous materials
transportation. Activities will include gathering data on the transportation of hazardous materials
through Indian Township Reservation . Information gathered will include content, volume and
frequency of shipment.
Maine
Passamaquoddy Tribe - Pleasant Point
$18,834
-------
5
REGION II
For more information, please contact Region II Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Melva Hayden at 212-637-5027
New York
Research Foundation/Bronx Community College, CUNY
$20,000
The Bronx Community College (BCC)/Research Foundation proposes to conduct a series of five
workshops on the Solid Waste Disposal Act and the Clean Air Act in low-income/minority Bronx
communities burdened by multiple environmental stresses. Project ECOJUSTICE will be
conducted by BCC's Community Education and Development Center in collaboration with the
Chemistry Department. Leaders and members of Bronx community based organizations will be
trained how to identify and address environmental violations and risks and environmental justice
issues.
New Cassel Environmental Justice Project (NCEJP) $20,000
This purpose of this project is to increase community awareness and educate residents living near
the New Cassel Industrial area through a quarterly newsletter, educational events and materials
and public meetings. The goal is to give residents the necessary information to recognize and
report water and air pollution problems and to get involved so that current and future use of toxic
chemicals will be reduced. New Cassel is home to over 16 sites listed on New York State's
Superfund registry and numerous other industrial facilities. The primary groups affected are New
Cassel's Haitian and Hispanic immigrants and African-American population.
Puerto Rican Family Institute, Inc. (PRFI) $20,000
This project focuses on obtaining and documenting information on mercury distribution at local
botanicas and the magnitude of mercury use in the Queens Hispanic community. Hispanics who
adhere to religions such as Santeria, Espiritismo and Santerismo often use mercury in their
cultural rituals. PRFI will produce and distribute bilingual education materials on the health risks
and problems associated with domestic mercury use. As the project develops, PRFI plans to
target their materials and outreach to Hispanic communities in the other boroughs.
Hope Unlimited International (HUI) $20,000
The goal of this project is to increase awareness in the South Bronx of risks associated with lead
paint and to empower the community to take necessary steps to reduce local risks. In partnership
with NYCDOH and Montefiorie Hospital, the project will train two people on lead abatement
who will then work directly in the community. HUI will teach residents how to identify primary
sources of lead and will facilitate lead screening and tests.
-------
6
Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation $20,000
The goal of this project is to increase the capacity of a network of 50 tenant associations to
develop and implement activities to ameliorate the problem of lead poisoning in their buildings
located in Northern Manhattan. Using the "train the trainer" method, this group will recruit
members from 50 tenant associations to give them the necessary tools to recognize lead poising
dangers (paint and pipes), to remove the lead source and to facilitate lead screening and tests.
International Youth Organization/AmeriCorps $18,398
The group proposes to address environmental justice issues in the northern portion (low
income/high minority) of Newark, NJ with a three-pronged approach: 1) help community
members identify environmental justice priorities through a series of environmental
education/communication workshops; 2) provide residents with skills and information to take
responsible action through community empowerment forums and; 3) conduct outreach to
generate community involvement and volunteer efforts to address environmental problems such as
lead poisoning, urban habitat degradation and brownfields.
Harlem Environmental Impact Project, Inc. $10,000
The organization plans to conduct a public outreach campaign on lead poisoning prevention and
reduction in the Harlem community. Through a technical database, the group will also track the
number of at-risk children identified, tested and found infected with lead poisoning. The outreach
campaign will include sponsoring environmental health workshops and clinics and making
presentations on "Inside Harlem", a public access cable program. The group will produce six
issues of a 10-page lead poisoning newsletter for Harlem residents.
Citizens Committee for New York City $19,974
The purpose of this proposal is to expand and continue the work of the Neighborhood
Environmental Leadership Institute (NELI) in the Bronx. NELI has already provided 250 low-
income Bronx residents interactive and experimental training in leadership, organizational
development and urban environmental issues. The group is developing an Environmental Justice
Resource Directory of private/public agencies that offer technical assistance and support to local
environmental issues. NELI, in cooperation with CUNY, is also providing training workshops on
tracking specific environmental issues and building organizational skills.
New Jersey
Ironbound Community Corporation $20,000
This purpose of this project is to develop the Ironbound Community Environmental Justice
Information, Education and Training Project (ICEJIETP). In collaboration with the New Jersey
Institute of Technology, this group will train community leaders to better understand
-------
7
environmental issues and to participate in the decision-making process. These community leaders
will also be trained how to build community coalitions and involve their fellow community
members in the process. The group will produce and distribute multi-lingual literature on local
environmental conditions and organize bi-monthly awareness conferences and workshops.
Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas $20,000
CATA proposes to continue their Safe Drinking Water Project in the Southern New Jersey farm
labor camps to empower farm workers to articulate the need for greater protection from well
water contamination. Some specific activities of the work plan include taking water samples from
the labor camp wells, making environmental assessments and disseminating information on the
test findings. Working through the migrant health clinics, CATA will also teach the farmers how
to protect themselves against contaminated drinking water and how to identify symptoms caused
by contaminated water.
Isles, Inc.
$20,000
This project will target the low-income/minority communities located around four brownfield sites
in Trenton and provide information on how and why the community should play a role in the
remediation and development plans of these contaminated properties. Isles will conduct
door-to-door interviews to assess the community's understanding of the sites and develop
materials outlining the site conditions, remediation processes and opportunities for community
participation. The group will host approximately 10 meeting/workshops for each of the four sites.
Citizen Policy and Education Fund of New Jersey $20,000
The purpose of this project is to work with parents and guardians of children in the low-
income/minority areas of Newark, Paterson/Passaic, Trenton and Camden to build their capacity
to identify sources of lead poisoning and to involve the community in the design and
implementation of activities to reduce this health risk. The project will recruit and train at least 80
parents think more critically in addressing lead poisoning and how to obtain assistance from local
health departments and property owners.
Puerto Rico
Comite Pro Costa Ventana, Inc.
$19,140
This project focuses on the Boca Ward community of Guaynilla, Puerto Rico which is also the
home of Tropical Fruits agricultural fields that are regularly sprayed with pesticides. This purpose
of the project is to educate the community on the laws regulating pesticide use and to build the
resident's capacity to identify misuses of pesticides, to protect their homes and families from
-------
8
unsafe exposure and to present their concerns to different government agencies involved.
Region III For more information, please contact Region III
Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Reginald Harris at 215-637-5027
District of Columbia
The Ballou and Anacostia Outreach Program
$20,000
The Environmentors Project
The Environmentors Project matches inner-city high school students with science and
environmental professionals for an eight month period of partnership whereby they will develop
projects designed to explore environmental issues of relevance. Thirty students from Ballou and
Anacostia High Schools will address the environmental problems affecting their community's
health and well-being. The project will encourage students to pursue careers in environmental
fields, engage in informed environmental activism and enlighten their communities.
An Intergenerational Project for Latino Communities
$20,000
National Hispanic Council on Aging
The goals of this project are to: 1) to build a Latino community's capacity to identify and
understand local environmental issues and how they impact their lives; 2) to facilitate the
development of environmental justice activities; and 3) to promote, facilitate communication and
information exchange among different stakeholders at the project site and other members of the
NHCoA network. These goal will be achieved through the establishment of an Advisory
committee, conducting a series of three community forums, and encouraging participants to
become advocates for environmental justice.
Community-based Hazardous Awareness Campaign $19,988
Howard University School of Social Work will conduct a training program on environmental
awareness and protection. The overall goal of the Community-based Promoters Training
Program is to enhance local groups and organizations in the recognition and control of
environmental hazards, personal protection, and health safety practices. Community groups and
organizations can then train and inform their communities.
Lydia's House Youth Environmental Club: Anacostia
Econet and Conservation Career Development Programs
$20,000
-------
9
The purpose of this project is two-fold. First, it will build the capacity of at-risk African American
youth to identify sources of water and solid waste pollution and to implement a waste
management initiative to address the problem. Secondly, this Environmental Justice Project will
expose and train 24 inner city youth between the ages of 16 and 21 to participate in conservation
career opportunities.
Maryland
Gwynns Falls Conservancy
$20,000
This project of the Gwynns Falls Conservancy serves to continue the completion of the Natural
Resource Inventory/Assessment Report of the Gwynns Falls. This report is a comprehensive five
year (1996-2000) environmental/ecosystem study, comprised of various long-term surveys of
leading indicators of the Gwynns Falls watershed. The report will be the starting point and
guideline for designing a justifiable and responsible environmental plan for the for the community,
and serve as the basis to gauge the effect and success of any implemented plan.
Environmental Education for Fairfield Farms
$20,000
The purpose of this project is to develop and present environmental awareness to the Greater
Fairmount Heights community and to develop strategies for environmental improvements in the
community. The POCDC will bring together residents and community constituents at four
community forums, including a career day for students, to discuss the impact of environmental
problems on the community and explore options for community cleanup.
Anacostia River Community Restoration Workshop
$20,000
The Anacostia Watershed Society will present an environmental awareness workshop for
instructors who teach at minority schools located within the Anacostia watershed in the District of
Columbia. The one-day workshop curriculum is designed to train teachers in the fundamental
issues related to the urban environment. These issues include the history of the Anacostia River,
impacts to the Anacostia River related to urbanization and industrial development, the
river/community connections; how improvements in the community will improve the quality of the
river, and what actions can be taken to restore the river.
Pennsylvania
Urban Environment: A Research and Education Project $19,960
Focusing on Nitrogen Dioxide as a Pollutant Source
The purpose of this project is to quantify the factors driving nitrogen dioxide concentration in the
home and to develop a model of nitrogen dioxide production, diffusion and dissipation in the
home. The model will then be used to predict potential occupant exposure levels with varying air
-------
10
flow configurations. This project will also empower community residents by facilitating their
participation in an advisory group and develop interventions which will alert community residents
to increased risks of asthma incidence due to factors in the indoor environment.
VIRGINIA
Environmental Justice Community Education Project $20,000
The goal of this effort by the Environmental Justice Technology Center (EJIC) is to develop a
methodology through Public workshops that will improve public awareness of outdoor and indoor
air quality health related issues. This process will involve the development of directed and
focused educational materials and workshops directed to urban minorities and environmental
justice communities.
Bayview Environmental and Community Action Plan $19,935
The purpose of this project is to begin a community-based self- help effort in the community of
Bayview. The participants will involve and educate Bayview's citizens, gain knowledge from
experts, build on partnerships, and implement effective action plans. First there will be an
environmental needs assessment, then the preparation of overlay maps of Bayview's
environmental planning area. Finally, the creation of the Bayview Environmental and Community
Action Plan.
Environmental Justice Assessment of Southampton County $20,000
The objective of this project is to characterize the potential impact of agricultural practices on
shallow, substandard private wells which are used predominately by low income and/or minority
households. The program goals are to (1) Enhance community understanding of environmental
and public health information systems and generate information on pollution in the community,
and (2) Identify necessary improvements in communication and coordination among all
stakeholders.
Mattaponi Tribe Proposal for Community Monitoring $18, 462
and Sustainable Tribal Development
This project will enhance tribal understanding of environmental and public health information,
environmental monitoring systems. This effort will help to generate information on the pollution
concerns of the tribe as well. This project will also improve the coordination and cooperation
between state, tribal and federal government agencies where they each have coinciding interests in
maintaining water quality and issues related to the fish population. The project will produce a
-------
11
Final Report and a video tape to be used by the tribal organizations and communities, as well as
other interested stakeholders.
Greener and Cleaner Richmond Initiative and "Adopt-a-Park" Program $20,000
Through the implementation of two programs; the Greener & Cleaner Richmond Initiative and the
"Adopt-A-Park" program, the City of Richmond will accomplish these goals: 1) low and
moderate income citizen will be able to gain appreciation for of Richmond's environment by
becoming shareholders in a portion of their surroundings; 2) neighborhoods and parks will
become be cleaned and made more aesthetically attractive; 3) the enhancement of the image of
and pride in Richmond's neighborhoods; 4) safety and environmental hazards would be removed;
5) the enlightenment and enrichment of the community with respect to environmental issues,
environmental justice, and sustainable development.
Region IV For more information, please contact Region IV Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Connie Raines at 404-562-9671
North Carolina
University of NC-Asheville - East Flat Rock Community $19,865
This project will establish a community "Lead Poisoning" prevention/education program for
children under age six and pregnant women located in a rural section of the Mid-Appalachian
Mountains, Henderson County, NC.
NC Cooperative Ext. Service - Northampton & Bertie Counties $19,986
This project will provide free screening of domestic drinking water for lead contamination to
minority and low income families in Northampton and Bertie Counties in northeastern North
Carolina. Families with elevated lead level detection in their drinking water will work with the
Health Department to determine the risk to family members, particularly children.
Florida
Concerned Citizens League of America $20,000
This project will set up health consultations with state and local experts to determine the levels of
pollution associated with phosphate mining and its processing operations; and, conduct
education/outreach programs for the community on how to deal with environmental problems.
Bethune-Cookman College, Daytona Beach $20,000
This awardee will work to educate minority community leaders, residents and students on the
human health threats of mercury in their homes and community.
-------
12
Tennessee
Alton Park/Piney Woods Improvement Corp $20,000
This project will promote and present public information and awareness programs to educate the
community on the health and environmental effects of the Chattanooga Creek dump site.
Emma Wheeler Homes Resident Association, Inc. $20,000
This project will present a series of public awareness programs and workshops designed to
disseminate information to the community about the Chattanooga Creek Superfiind site. Also,
will develop a visual aids display for the community using photographs describing environmental
hazards, and the effects of living in a polluted community.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center $20,000
Identify possible vectors of lead exposure and develop an environmental awareness program for
Hispanic migrant farming communities on lead exposure and the safe use and handling of
pesticides in their work environment.
Lawrence County School System $20,000
The City of Loretto, working in partnership with students and faculty from Loretto High School
and TVA's Environmental Research Center, will conduct extensive academic research and limited
laboratory research directed at discovering possible solutions for sludge removal.
Alabama
Oakwood College $20,000
Identify the impact of PCP and DDT on the health of residents in Triana. Educate residents on
environmental issues in their community by conducting workshops and research to identify high
risk individuals for cancer, and involving youth in health fairs and other activities.
Project Awake $20,000
Conduct workshops for the community on topics ranging from hazardous waste, pesticides,
community safety, health risk, groundwater and water quality.
Kentucky
Appalshop, Inc. Appalachian, KY; TN, VA & NC $20,000
This project will establish a network of organizations and activists who are working on environ-
-------
13
mental and social justice issues; develop a community based on line network; reestablish a
regional newsletter; and conduct workshops to educate the community on environmental issues.
Georgia
Citizens for Environmental Justice $20,000
Translate scientific and technical concepts and information underlying environmental justice
awareness into an understandable fashion to Savannah area high school students and
citizens in poor and minority neighborhoods.
Hunt Educational & Cultural Center $20,000
The awardee will conduct training covering health practices, water quality and environmental
safety for residents living around a superfund site.
South Carolina
Catawba Indian Nation
$20,000
Develop database for air quality inventory by conducting a source evaluation of reservation lands
and the surrounding community; develop public education strategies to inform and educate tribal
members of air quality problems; and, provide technical training for key tribal individuals on GIS
and Hach Water Quality Laboratory equipment.
Mississippi
Phil-Am Association of Central MS
$20,000
Develop community based education and training programs for parents and children of
disadvantaged communities in Central MS consisting of low-income Filipino-American, African
American and Choctaw Indian families.
Region V For more information, please contact Region V
Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Karla Johnson at 312-886-2737
Illinois
Lead Elimination Drive
$20,000
This project will build community-based capacity to address the issue of childhood lead poisoning
on the Westside of Chicago through a community-based lead job planning project. The project
will convene a committee of community leaders to initiate a community-based planning process to
-------
14
identify strategies and opportunities for training community residents as lead inspectors and
abatement workers, in order to provide low-cost community lead abatement ser- vice and to
create quality jobs for residents of communities suffering disproportionate exposure.
Victory Heights/Maple Park Community Association $19,900
This project will enhance the community's capacity to actively participate in brownfield
redevelopment through the development of a series of orientation and education modules that can
be used by community groups to enhance community understanding and assist in the identification
of issues and options to be considered in the process of brownfield site analysis, remediation,
maintenance, and reuse. These modules will be designed by a consortium of community groups,
local government staff, and university personnel in Chicago. The primary objective of the project
is to increase the ability of the community to participate in both the remediation and maintenance
planning for brownfield sites and to facilitate more efficient and cost effective redevelopment of
brownfield sites.
Community Health Partnership $19,984
This project will increase the capacity within the Latino farm worker population of Kankakee
County to reduce their own risk of injury and illness from pesticide exposure through peer-based
pesticide safety training and community-based environmental health education targeting Latino
migrant and seasonal farm workers and family members and to increase compliance with the U.S.
EPA Worker Protection Standard (WPS) through consensus building and collaboration among
the various stakeholders to promote full implementation of all provisions of the WPS throughout
Illinois. The project goals will be met through: (1) the Illinois WPS Stakeholder Committee
which will bring together individuals representing various segments of the agricultural industry,
health and safety specialists, pesticide regulators, and farm worker service providers and
advocates to develop consensus around tools to support full compliance with the WPS; and (2)
the recruitment, training and ongoing supervision and support of five farm workers who will serve
as environmental "promotores de salud"(health promoters) to provide pesticide safety education
and environmental health education to farm workers and their families.
Center for Neighborhood Technology $20,000
This awardee will work with industry and environmental stakeholders to educate dry cleaners on
the latest alternative technology to traditional dry cleaning and opportunities to convert to
emerging wet cleaning technology. The project will work in a three State area, including Illinois,
Indiana and Wisconsin, to outreach minority and underserved communities to expand the
opportunities for education and training in pollution prevention. Workshops will be offered for
dry cleaner's technical needs as well as for community members interested in wet cleaning as an
economic development source, including providing resource materials and a needs assessment for
the development of a tool kit to help minority communities evaluate if wet cleaning is a viable
economic development opportunity.
-------
15
Westside Alliance for a Safe and Toxic Free Environment
$20,000
This project will facilitate a community-based land-use and revitalization process that will: (1)
gather and evaluate the causes and effects of environmentally harmful land uses, potential sites of
concern, and potential industries for "Good Neighbor Agreements"; (2) host multi-media
presentations on these sites for communities on the Westside of Chicago; (3) facilitate a process
for each community to reach consensus on priority sites; and (4) work in partnership to develop
environmentally sound land uses plans.
Alta Sita Neighbors $20,000
This project will facilitate the direct involvement of neighborhood residents to participate in the
planning and implementation process of cleaning and maintaining vacant lots. Workshops will be
offered to residents on the health risks associated with illegal dumping and instruction on action
that can be taken to remediate these conditions. The project will (1) work with the residents to
identify the ten worst vacant lots in the neighborhood; (2) to work with property owners to
facilitate cleanup and maintenance of the vacant lots; and (3) work with the City to ensure action
is taken against property owners who are recalcitrant. The project will also develop a preventive
strategy designed to address illegal dumping in Alta Sita.
Project VIDA $20,000
This awardee will develop a participatory, interactive Environmental Justice project for the
Hispanic community of "Little Village" that will: (1) create an EJ youth and family organization in
the community; (2) develop, implement and evaluate a home toxic and asthma trigger inventory
and curriculum that emphasizes pollution prevention and risk reduction activities; (3) conduct a
community environmental inventory of toxic sources in and around Little Village;
(4) develop a mural program integrating EJ issues with cultural themes of the community; and (5)
develop educational materials and community forums around a neighboring
brownfield site with Superfiind status pending.
This awardee will facilitate an economic development project in the African-American and low-
income communities to mitigate local environmental inequities. The project will bring together
community-based organizations and government stakeholders for the purposes of community
education, empowerment and brownfields redevelopment. The goals of the project include: (1) to
mobilize and advocate for site cleanups or brownfields redevelopment; (2) to educate citizens
about environmental hazards; and (3) to develop a strategy for economic and environmental
sustainability.
Indiana
Indianapolis Urban League
$20,000
-------
16
Michigan
Legal Services of Eastern Michigan $12,434
This awardee will establish a community partnership that will provide lead education and outreach
to the low-income communities of Genessee and Saginaw Counties. The project will include: (1)
education regarding the hazards of lead poisoning in both the air and water; (2) development of a
resource database of agencies that may provide services to address lead poisoning; (3) referrals;
and (4) expansion of linkages with agencies that deal with either lead and/or housing issues to
establish and strengthen a community-based network to address lead poisoning problems.
Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services $20,000
This awardee will provide education and outreach for the predominantly Arab-American
community in Dearborn, Michigan, concerning the problems with environmental hazards in the
community and its effects on health, emphasizing childhood asthma and lead poisoning.
Minnesota
Grand Portage Band of Chippewa Tribe
$15,000
This project will enhance the community's understanding of environmental and public health
threats from mercury emissions and the resulting levels in the community food supply. The
project will include: (1) development of a report on mercury, results of any mercury studies which
have been conducted on mercury contamination of fish, and sources of mercury emissions on the
Grand Portage Reservation; (2) workshops and meeting with partners on the mercury problem at
Grand Portage Reservation; (3) working with local fishermen to gather fish and to have the fish
tissue analyzed for mercury concentrations, risk assessment of the fish data; and (4) creation of
brochures to document findings, and setting consumption recommendations, as needed.
Ohio
Environmental Health Watch
$19,716
This awardee will work in partnership with the Cleveland Health Department, community-based
organizations, and the Association of Parents to Prevent Lead Exposure (APPLE) to integrate
asthma control education with lead poisoning prevention education for parents. The project will:
(1) test the feasibility of expanding the scope of a lead hazard control program to include asthma-
related environmental hazards; (2) explore practical and no-cost or low-cost interventions to
reduce asthma-related household pollutants in low-income housing; and (3) assist neighborhood-
based organizations to integrate consideration of indoor pollution hazards into their existing
programs to develop affordable housing.
Wisconsin
-------
17
Wisconsin Citizen Action Fund
$20,000
This awardee will work to reduce the number of children in Milwaukee's predominantly African-
American "central city" that are lead poisoned by organizing a task force of "central city" parents
into an effective community force, mobilizing property owners, health care providers, the City of
Milwaukee, community-based organizations and churches to create lead safety zones in targeted
"central city" neighborhoods. The project will educate parents of lead poisoned children about
opportunities to make their homes more lead safe and will train a core of ten parents within the
larger parent-run task force to be directly involved in ongoing and new lead prevention efforts at
the local and State level.
Region VI For more information, please contact Region VI
Environmental
This project goal is to produce a monthly newsletter that will address environmentally sensitive
information and raise community awareness about local and State issues which pertain to
environmental justice. It will increase awareness and improve communication and coordination
within and among the local community, stakeholders and rural communities state-wide with
similar drinking water and solid waste disposal problems. The project will enhance community
understanding of environmental and public health information systems and provide information
that will encourage prevention of ground water and surface water pollution in the community.
This project will educate communities on environmental justice issues and pollution prevention
strategies along the Mississippi River chemical corridor. To achieve this goal, the Deep South
Center will train the residents on efficient use of computers to retrieve and disseminate
environmental information ("Computer Ready"); give residents information on the responsibilities
of local, State, and Federal agencies ("Who's Protecting You");and, review site specific
information on the sources of pollution in the targeted community("What's In My Air?"). To
build bridges of communication, the project will provide a series of meetings with representatives
from Federal, State and local environmental agencies.
New Mexico
Adelante RC&D Council, Inc.
$17,103
Justice Coordinator, Shirley Augurson at 214-665-7401
Arkansas
White River Environmental Protection Association
$ 4,507
Louisiana
Xavier University - Deep South Center for EJ
$20,000
The project will help stake holders address environmental justice problems. One workshop will
-------
18
be held on pollution related water quality problems in the watershed due to poor resource
management and environmental law, a separate workshop will be on solid waste disposal and
environmental law. This project includes four field trips for fourth and fifth grade students giving
hands on experience. The project will enhance understanding of environmental health information
and generate information on pollution in the community with an informational brochure on
pollution problems and solutions within Upper Pecos Watershed.
Rural Community Assistance Corporation $13,992
In this project the Corporation will coordinate and train low-income communities on the causes,
extent, prevention, reduction and elimination of water pollution in New Mexico. Water treatment
system operators will be trained on safe and proper operation and maintenance of water and
wastewater systems in four colonias in Dona Ana County. This information will provide an
enhanced capacity to solve problems, hire and supervise system operators and, work toward
compliance with Safe Drinking Water and Clean Water Acts requirements.
The Caddo Indian Tribe seeks to demonstrate effective approaches for providing clean water and
safe drinking water and identify the impact of illegal dumping on the following areas: Caddo,
Grady, and Washita Counties in Oklahoma. The project will provide awareness, education,
monitoring, assessment and training for volunteers regarding water sampling techniques. The
success of the project will be evaluated through increased participation in community programs
and a reduction in illegal dumping.
Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma $20,000
The purpose of this project is to develop policy and management plans to reduce water quality
risks and impairments due to nonpoint sources of pollution. Development and implementation of
tribal water quality standards program and a tribal solid waste management plan will provide
management tools for reducing nonpoint source impact on water quality. Environmental
education will be provided to the community through the "Blue Thumb" program. The target
audiences will include tribal, city, and county residents.
The goal of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) US-Mexico Border project is bi-national
understanding, treatment and prevention of environmentally-caused illness-particularly
respiratory health-in the US-Mexico border region. To accomplish this goal, PSR will increase
communications and cooperation between U.S. and Mexican physicians; facilitate citizen
understanding of and input into the region's environmental health policies, treatment and
Oklahoma
Caddo Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
$19,996
Texas
Physicians for Social Responsibility
$20,000
-------
19
prevention measures; work with local community groups on both sides of the border to develop a
Parents' Resource Guide to Childhood Respiratory Health.
Scienta Associates, Inc. $15,493
The goal of the Scienta Project is to provide a process for information and concerns to be
discussed throughout the community. This process will provide a forum for disparate parties to
learn each other's needs which will enable them to create a better communication process
between major industries and local disadvantaged communities. In addition, this project will
evaluate mitigation, minimization or compensation of disproportionate impacts.
Foundation for a Compassionate Society $19,914
The implementation of this project is challenged by the fact that many residents are disabled by
chronic illnesses. The benefits lie in working toward a healthier environment for future
generations. Success of the project will be evaluated by measuring community participation in
training and presentations and in reaching agreements with stakeholders on the prevention and
elimination of pollution.
Community Action Council of South Texas $19,111
This project will be known as the "B&E Dumpsite Clean up" and will serve the purpose of
bringing the area into compliance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act and the Clean Water Act. In
addition, the project will improve the appearance and the quality of life for the nine hundred
residents of the colonia. Aside from the environmental justice issues, the dumpsite clean up
project will also provide temporary employment to residents who will do some of the necessary
manual labor.
Esperanza Peace and Justice Center $20,000
This project will address air pollution and solid waste problems in San Antonio's East side and the
Martinez neighborhood through community education and grassroots organizing efforts. The
ESPERANZA has chosen residents in these areas as its target audience because of the compelling
nature of their circumstances and their established tract records for grassroots organizing around
environmental issues. About 80% of the project's resources will go to community education
efforts. The other 20% of resources will be devoted to grassroots organizing specifically aimed at
raising the target audience's awareness of the pollution problems posed by the Deely power plant.
American Institute for Learning $19,992
The purposes for the Fort Branch watershed project are to: (1) collect data on the watershed; (2)
train 5-7 at-risk youths to create an interactive tool for watershed wareness; (3) facilitate a
minimum of six workshops on watershed issues through community groups and three local
-------
20
elementaries; (4) increase the environmental awareness of at least 200 community members
around watersheds and non-point source pollution; and (5) impact the quality of watersheds by
improving the knowledge and resources of community residents and increase community action.
South Centeral Partnership for Environmental Technical Education Lamar
University- Port Arthur $19,898
The West Side Environmental Education Project will stimulate community awareness of
environmental concerns by educating West Side residents on environmental hazards in their
neighborhoods via quarterly meetings; encouraging investigations of community environmental
concerns including air and residential drinking water; leading hands-on investigations to facilitate
collection, monitoring, and analyses of air samples; encouraging West Side residents to take part
in solving its environmental problems and guide city government in formulating policies which
affect the safety and health of the community through town hall-style meetings.
Galveston-Houston Association for SMOG Prevention (GHASP) $19,990
This project will combine the development of an active Woodland Acres chapter of Mothers for
Clean Air with the broad objectives of increasing community awareness of air and solid waste
hazards, identifying environmental justice issues, and gathering further information regarding
pollution sources in or near the community. The project is expected to be completed in twelve
months, but the chapter will continue to exist beyond the funding period. At least five members,
by the end of the one year period, will have the ability to use a computer to communicate with
resource persons outside the community and access various databases.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) $60,000
Multisite Superfund Community Outreach and Education
This project is designed to assist minority and low income communities in health/safety measures
to be employed in locations having close proximity to Superfund sites. The project will consist of
community meetings, education and training sessions and development and distribution of
materials within affected communities.
Region VII For more information, please contact Region VII Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Althea Moses at 913-551-7649
Missouri
American Lung Association $20,000
The American Lung Association of Eastern Missouri has designed an Environmental Justice
Pollution Prevention project which highlights the EPA goals of improving communication among
stakeholders and enhancing critical thinking, problem solving and active participation of the
affected community. The project's focus will be to educate automotive body and repair shops in
pollution prevention techniques to reduce air emissions, reduce human exposure to toxins and
eliminate excess waste. This project will attain this goal by utilizing experts to assist with the
-------
21
design, training and implementation of the project; training teens and their peer outreach workers
to dialogue with automotive shop owners and their employees about cost saving pollution
prevention techniques as well as the health risks present in their workplace; and, evaluating the
knowledge and implementation of our identified pollution prevention activities at the facilities six
months after training.
Saint Louis University SI6,000
The awardee will provide a conference for Realtors and brokers, financial institutions, home
inspectors, and owners of rental property in the greater St. Louis Metropolitan area, which
includes Missouri and Illinois. The focus of the conference will be on policies and regulations
surrounding environmental hazards in residential properties.
Iowa
Siouxland District Health Department $20,000
The focus of this project will be ambient air quality, specifically carbon monoxide levels, that
lower income non-English speaking citizens are being exposed to in their homes and cars.
Cooperation with consumers, the Siouxland media, Sioux City Fire/Rescue departments, the
Siouxland CarMonoxide Coalition and La Casa Latina Center will be a key part of this project.
Midwest Assistance Program $20,000
The Midwest Assistance Program will work with the community of Toronto Iowa to address
wastewater discharge problems and resulting concerns about the quality of water in private wells.
Dallas County Environmental Health Department $20,000
The goals of this project are to increase the public awareness of risk factors in target populations,
gather data on the extent of disease due to risk factors, and improve communication and public
education by developing educational materials in Spanish.
Black Hawk County Health Department $19,979
Through the use of Geographic Information System technology, it will be the goal of this project
to evaluate existing programs, environmental problems and services provided to predominantly
African-American neighborhoods in the inner city of Waterloo, Iowa.
Iowa State University $14,000
This project will develop a GIS-based tool to prototype system that will allow us to investigate
-------
22
issues of environmental justice involving hazardous waste facilities, underground storage tanks,
and large hog farms in Iowa. The study will integrate a wide range of existing environmental,
socioeconomic, and demographic databases with ArcView GIS and S-Plus statistical analysis
software to test the overarching hypothesis that higher levels of environmental degradation in
Iowa are associated with race, ethnicity and income.
Kansas
Leadbusters $20,000
The Leadbusters project is an outgrowth of the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Coalition in
metropolitan Kansas City and a continuation of the "Lead-Safe KC" Project begun in mid-1994.
Lead will conduct a continuation of an environmental awareness campaign that covers the
metropolitan area but will be targeted to low income and moderate income urban neighborhoods
in the adjacent communities of Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas.
Wyandotte County Health Department $19,916
Wyandotte County Health Department provides public health and environmental services to all
citizens of the county. This project will partner with Parents as Teachers, Project Eagle, and
Head Start to reduce the risk of lead exposure to high risk families, with special emphasis on
children in Wyandotte County, through a coordinated community based education process.
Nebraska
NE Department of Health and Human Services Regulation and Licensure $20,000
The Indoor Air Quality and Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs propose a
cooperative approach to educate the people of under serviced communities in Nebraska on lead
and indoor air quality hazards and ways to reduce these hazards for young children and their
families. The ultimate goal is widespread education on two important issues in environmental
health minorities and low-income populations, childhood lead poisoning and indoor air quality.
Nebraska State Recycling Association $20,000
The Nebraska State Recycling Association (NSRA) is developing a Community Outreach
Implementation Program which is a key component of their overall inner-city restoration
initiative. It links together several active and proposed programs that NSRA's is coordinating
including: Facilitation of Inner-city Coalition on the Environment, BIS Data Base Phase I and
Phase 2 and the Green Building/Eco-Park Project.
Indian Center, Inc. $20,000
The Indian Center, Inc. in cooperation with the Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department
-------
23
childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program will address the hazards of lead based point facing
minority populations. The Indian Center through the Lead Program will offer educational classes
to Native Americans and other minorities and low-income people on environmentally acceptable
lead based paint hazard minimization.
Region VIII For more information, please contact Region Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Elisabeth Evans at 303-312-6053
Colorado
Cross Community Coalition (COPEEN)
$19,920
Family Resource Center
The Cross Community Coalition is serving as the umbrella agency for the Colorado Peoples'
Environmental and Economic Network (COPEEN). COPEEN's goal is to bring together
community-based grassroots people of color groups to build partnerships to address
environmental justice issues, improve coordination, communication, and information exchange
among these groups. This year's proposal has grown out of their current work of updating the
1990 Citizen Action report, "Poisons in Our Neighborhoods", which used Toxic Release Inventory
(TRI) data to document, by County and Zip Code, the amounts of toxic chemicals released into
communities in Colorado. During this research they discovered that there is a large amount of
data which is NOT included in the TRI reports which may impact a community. COPEEN has
identified areas where it is necessary to improve communication and coordination between
grassroots community-based organizations and local, state, and federal transportation entities in
the North Denver communities of Elyria, Swansea, Globeville and North Park Hill.
Office of the District Attorney - Fifth Judicial District $15,240
The purpose of this project is to assist local compliance with the Emergency Planning and
Community Right to Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) emphasizing target populations of Hispanic
and low income persons expected to be most at risk. The mechanism for the project is the funding
of a full time Coordinator to serve the Fifth Judicial District's Regional Emergency Planning
Committee (REPC). An analysis of the Superfund sites in the district is instructive in
understanding the target population most likely to be assisted by compliance with EPCRA.
National Association of Black Environmentalists (NABE) $20,000
The National Association of Black Environmentalists (NABE) is a local academic, scholarship,
and mentoring organization dedicated to attracting minority and disadvantaged youth into
environmental careers in the Denver, Colorado area. NABE is committed to enticing young
-------
24
people of color and/or disadvantage into environmental careers through a comprehensive
academic program that exposes students to a multiplicity of environmental disciplines. The
students served by NABE are low-income, minority and disadvantaged youth whose parents have,
by and large, not been educated beyond high-school. Of core NABE participants, approximately
73 percent have been placed in environmental internships with Colorado Center for Environmental
Management, Stapleton Development Corporation and National Parks Service. Two high school
graduates from NABE are now in college pursuing careers in chemical engineering and
environmental health respectively.
San Juan Basin Health Department $19,062
South Durango, a low income and predominantly Hispanic area, is one example of a population
that will benefit from this community-based approach. The residents of South Durango, as
represented by the South Durango Neighborhood Association (SDNA), feel this section of town
has born a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from the
commercial operation of the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad. This vintage railroad
is operated as a tourist attraction year-round, with 5-6 coal-fired locomotives in service during the
peak summer months. These train engines are kept idling overnight in the rail yard and
roundhouse on property located at the western border of this neighborhood. The emissions
generated by these engines blanket the neighborhood with soot and noxious-smelling coal smoke
that reduces visibility. Residents feel these emissions significantly impact their quality of life and
may contain chemical contaminants, particulate, and other hazardous substances which are a
significant health risk due to the long-term, repeated exposure to the smoke. Past air quality
studies have been conducted by the Air Pollution Control Division, the US Geological Survey,
National Park Service and Uranium Mine Tailing Remediation Act officials. No effort has been
made to consolidate this information into a user-friendly tool for community planning.
Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe
$20,000
This project will identify, assess and address inequitable environmental impacts from mining
operations to the White Mesa Community located in southeast Utah, eleven miles south of
Blanding . The White Mesa Uranium Mill owned and operated by Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc. is
located 5 miles from the tribal community. White Mesa Community consisting of 800 acres, 99%
tribal members mostly of the Ute Mt. Ute Tribe, an unemployment rate of 50-60% and a per
family annual average income of less than $5,000 is a separate part of the Ute Mountain Ute
Indian Reservation. An environmental consultant with technical expertise will be hired to analyze
and interpret existing data from semi-annual reports from the mill to the Nuclear Regulatory
Agency. The Tribe will establish communication with the State of Utah, Division of Radiation
Control and the Division of Water Quality regarding this issue which has had poor communication
in the past.
The consultant will be required to explain the assessment results and recommendations to the
-------
25
White Mesa Council and develop reports that can be easily interpreted by the Community members which will
enhance the understanding of environmental and public health issues.
This project will provide environmental education for low income inner-city residents through
Denver's Environmental Education Initiative. NDHC will develop a program that educates
residents about their environment. This project will be a model that brings the community, private
and public sector together to learn from each other and to formulate sustainable solutions through
workshops and community events.
Stapleton Development Corporation
$15,778
This project will provide opportunities to economically disadvantaged and ethnically diverse
youth, ages 15-24, learn about environmental issues by working on environmental work projects
along Sand Creek. This program will enable youth to obtain meaningful employment experience,
job and life skills training while providing valuable information about the environmental issues
affecting the northeast Denver metro community.
The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, located in north-central Montana, encompasses an area of
653,000 acres and is the home of the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes. It has a high
unemployment rate of 78% and a total resident population of approximately 3,600. The foremost
environmental concern of the Fort Belknap Community Council (FBCC) and Fort Belknap Indian
Reservation residents is the risk of water contamination from Montana's largest cyanide heap
leach gold mining operation - the Zortman and Landusky gold mines. These mines are located
adjacent to the Reservation's southern border and pose threats to the Little Rocky Mountain
Ecoregion and to the health of surrounding communities on the Reservation.
The project proposes to (1) inform and educate the community on water quality and safe drinking
water issues through a quarterly newsletter, two workshops (one on safe drinking water and the
other on water quality issues) and radio (KGVA Fort Belknap College radio station) forums and
programs, (2) seek to empower the community through workshops and radio forums and
programs so they may make more informed environmental decisions and actively participate in
environmental issues, and (3) build and expand community partnerships with environmental
organizations and agencies to promote local environmental justice issues. One half-time staff
person (Media Support Assistant) will be hired to implement this project.
Northeast Denver Housing Center
$20,000
Montana
Fort Belknap Community Council
$20,000
South Dakota
Jobs and Environment Campaign/Pine Ridge Reservation Ecology Initiative
$20,000
-------
26
This project is requesting funds to complete Phase 3 of the Ogalala Lakota Environmental
Empowerment Project (OLEEP) which is an on-going partnership/collaboration between Native
Ecology Initiative, an Indian-run, non-profit project, and the Ogalala Lakota Nation (OLN). This
partnership is designed to substantially improve the quality of existing environmental programs of
the OLN that have a direct impact on the Pine Ridge Reservation in the State of South Dakota.
This project will focus upon the rights of the Ogalala Lakota people to protect their groundwater
from pesticides.
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe $20,000
The Lower Brule Sioux Tribe is located in Lower Brule, SD. The project will analyze possible
contamination of drinking water from groundwater relative to the use of pesticides, herbicides anc
chemicals on irrigated lands on the reservation. This information will then be shared with
community members, through formation of an Environmental Review Commission representing
community stakeholders.
Sinte Gleska University $20,000
Sinte Gleska University is located on the Rosebud Sioux Reservation in Rosebud, South Dakota.
This project will conduct training of personnel from Native American tribes in the detection of
environmental contaminants, in the analysis of environmental data, and the use of environmental
analysis equipment.
Wyoming
Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes $20,000
The Wind River Environmental Quality Commission (WREQC), an entity of the Shoshone and
Arapaho Tribes (Tribes) of the Wind River Indian Reservation (Reservation), will conduct
research and findings of new innovative ways to reduce the exposure of tribal members to
potentially toxic waste and chemicals through a combination of efforts aimed at: recycling
research; general public education on a lean and safe environment; provide access to information
on hazardous materials; work with private and tribal programs on planning for pollution
prevention; collection and elimination of hazardous materials from individuals private homes.
WREQC will hold one Environmental Fair where all Reservation Schools can design posters on
pollution prevention and participate in seminars, and skits to better help the students learn about
keeping their neighborhoods' environment safe and clean. At the environmental fair, they will
invite various tribal, federal, state and private agencies to host a booth to disseminate their
information on pollution prevention and saving the environment.
-------
27
Utah
Utah Society for Environmental Education $20,000
The Jordan River Stewardship Project, Phase III directly targets environmental justice issues
related to clean water and solid waste for this low-income community near the Jordan River. The
goal of the project is to change the community's attitude about the river and their ability to resolve
environmental justice issues facing them. When this project started in 1995, many in the
community accepted the stereotypes associated with the "West Side" of Salt Lake and thought of
the river as a polluted dumping ground. Because of this project, many of these same people have
more pride in their community and think of the river's potential to be a beautiful riparian parkway
located in their backyard.
The purpose of this project is to maintain USEE'S presence in the community. USEE will continue
to improve and expand communication and information exchange; recruit additional stakeholders;
and educate the community about environmental justice issues and how they can address these
concerns. Specifically, USEE will continue to work as facilitator and liaison with schools,
community councils, other community groups and agencies; will publish a monthly newsletter that
informs the community about issues, events and celebrations along the river; and will broaden
community involvement and increase partnerships.
Region IX For more information, please contact Region IX Environmental
Justice Team, Katy Wilcoxen at 415-744-1565
Arizona
Don't Waste Arizona/Concerned Residents of South Phoenix $19,900
Environmental Justice Newsletter & Hotline for residents of South Phoenix. As a response
to the 1992 Quality Printed Circuits fire, Don't Waste Arizona, Inc has been active in helping to
educate the community on the environmental justice issues affecting them. The newsletter aims to
provide general and technical information to affected residents of the environmental issues related
to the QPC fire and the resources available to the community to help them respond to
environmental justice issues.
Hualapai Tribe $20,000
Used Oil Recycling Project. This project aims to protect the environment and natural habitat for
current and future generations through a preventative pollution plan. The project includes
generating a bimonthly newsletter that informs the community about recycling facility
programming, setting up community presentations and improving community access to the
environmental resource library at the local Transfer & Recycling Center.
Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Inc.
$19,973
-------
28
Household Hazardous Material Bilingual Education Materials Project. Sonora Environmental
Research Institute, Inc. will develop and distribute educational materials to schools and the
general public, both in English and Spanish, to be used in classroom education. The project will
incorporate workshops for teachers to enhance general and technical understanding of the issue of
hazardous materials, as well as engage in general outreach efforts to the pubic through
environmental forums and events.
California
St. Peter's Housing Committee $19,500
Lead Poisoning Outreach and Education. The project aims to improve lead-safety and prevent
lead poisoning among low-income and monolingual Spanish speaking tenants and workers in San
Francisco's Mission District. The project will utilize the Lead Safe Housing Advocacy Program
to assist tenants in assessing and reducing lead hazards in their homes before poisoning occurs and
the Lead Safe Work Program which addresses lead exposure caused by housing renovation and
maintenance that disturbs lead based paint.
Pre-School Coordinating Council, Inc $20,000
Lead Poisoning Prevention for Low-Income Minority Families. The project focuses on childhood
lead poisoning in the communities of Pittsburg, CA. The Coordinating Council will determine
the number of people in the targeted community capable of job-related, take home lead exposure,
educate employers and workers in these lead related businesses, inform families in older at-risk
residences about lead poisoning prevention, and increase the number of children screened for lead
poisoning.
Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles $20,000
Concerned Citizens in collaboration with Los Angeles Metropolitan Network of Churches will
develop a campaign to clean-up the toxic waste in South Central Los Angeles. The campaign
will include community outreach efforts, promoting cancer tests for residents; recruiting health
specialists to assist in developing a strategy to address health risks; and meeting with local and
state officials to develop effective clean-up schedule for the contaminated sites.
Ammonia Safety & Training Institute $20,000
Ammonia Safety Workshops. The Ammonia Safety & Training Institute will provide 20,
four-hour workshops to public and private stakeholders in Stockton, Bakersfield, Las Vegas and
Phoenix. The workshops are intended to enhance communication between public and private
sectors in the event of an ammonia incident and increase community awareness on ammonia
safety.
People United to Demand Environmental Rights (PODER)
$20,000
-------
29
Environmental Justice Empowerment Project. PODER, in collaboration with the Chinese
Progressive Association, will seek to improve communication between affected low income
communities of color in San Francisco. The project will focus on working with residents of the
Mission District and Chinatown communities to assess and prioritize their environmental justice
concerns. The project will include community outreach efforts, research and the creation of
educational materials. A subsequent campaign plan will be developed to address the identified
environmental justice concerns and conduct environmental summits for grassroots organizations
in low income communities in the city.
Pinoleville Band of Pomo Indians $20,000
Community Education and Planning Project. The Tribe is concerned about the impacts of past
land use decisions on the siting of operations which can present environment hazards within
and near the Pinoleville Indian Reservation. The project aims to develop a Restoration/Reme-
diation Strategy for Ackerman Creek. The Tribe will work closely with the Mendocino
Environmental Center and technical experts who can provide specific information to help build a
broader understanding of the environmental justice issues affecting the community. The project
will include community workshops as well as various media, including the Internet, to organize
and inform community members.
City of Oakland, Fire Services Agency $20,000
Hazardous Materials Awareness and Educational Program. The Fire Services Agency of the
City of Oakland has been awarded a grant to expand its neighborhood training program, Citizens
of Oakland Respond to Emergencies (CORE), to include a hazardous materials and community-
right-to-know component. The CORE project, in collaboration with the African American
Development Association, aims to foster greater understanding and spirit of cooperation
between government, local community based organizations, environmental advocacies and the
local citizenry.
African American Development Association (AADA) $19,000
Defensible Space Assessment (DSA). AADA, in collaboration with the city of Oakland's
Office of Emergency Services, will identify where hazardous materials are stored or transported
in a mixed land-use area in West Oakland and therefore where a need for community training and
education exists. Community members will be trained in toxics and hazardous materials to
ensure a safe and predictable response in the event of a chemical spill. This project also includes
a geographic assessment of current land uses, GIS mapping of West Oakland, and development
of a transportation hazard assessment report.
Communities for a Better Environment (CBE)
$20,000
-------
30
The LA CAUSA Student Initiative. This project aims to develop environmental leadership among
youth by engaging high school students at Huntington Park High School in classroom education
and site specific campaigns on environmental problems in southeast Los Angeles. Students will
learn a variety of skills, including air monitoring, computer research and data analysis.
Additionally, students will conduct various outreach efforts, including community workshops,
presentations and a city wide conference.
La Clinica de la Raza - Fruitvale Health Project, Inc. Oakland, CA $20,000
Lead Poisoning Education Project. This project focuses on the communities of Fruitvale and San
Antonio, two multicultural and diverse districts of the city of Oakland. The goal of the project
is to build community-based leadership to help empower residents to address lead exposure
issues in their community. The project will train community members as Health Educators
through its existing Escuela Para Promotores, provide information and education on lead
poisoning and the resources available to the community through the Casa en Casa model,
and carry out a community action that is originated, developed and implemented by community
members through a Casa en Casa group.
National Council of Negro Women, Inc. $16,500
Radon and Indoor Air Pollution Project. This organization promotes empowerment and unity
among women in matters affecting their environmental, educational, cultural, economic, social
and spiritual life. The project is designed to reduce public health risks of radon and indoor air
contamination by conducting and distributing 1,000 radon tests in the San Fernando Valley.
One goal of the project is to help institutionalize radon testing of homes and buildings and
prevention of other unhealthy indoor contaminants by developing strategies with key segments
of the community including real estate community, government officials, public health officials,
and school organizations.
Hawaii
Puna Malama Pono, Inc. $20,000
Air Pollution Monitoring Project. Puna Malama Pono (PMP) will conduct a community air
pollution monitoring project to develop a mechanism to respond to the pollution issues related to
a geothermal electric generating facility. Project participants will monitor and record air
emissions through a air pollution monitoring device and train community resident volunteers to
conduct random air emission monitoring using global positioning and air monitoring technologic
devices. The project seeks ultimately to reduce the environmental and health impacts related to
toxic air pollution by engaging community members, concerned health professionals and
governmental officials in air monitoring solutions.
Region X For more information, please contact Region X Environmental
Justice Coordinator, Joyce Kelly at 206-553-4029
-------
31
ALASKA
Chugachmiut $20,000
Tribal governments have been continually challenged by the lack of information and partici- pation
in NEPA issues. This project plans on addressing this continuing problem by coordina- ing and
supporting local tribal governments in the production of a "Tribal Guide to the NEPA Process."
Rural Alaska Community Action Program $19,953
The need for subsistence information is key to future environmental decisions in rural Alaska.
The focus of this grant is to transform hard copy subsistence maps into a digital format, ensuring
that the traditional uses of the land are readily available for communities, and compatible with
existing information, e.g. toxic sites and Superfund data.
Idaho
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes $20,000
Multi-level Aquifer Sampling: An assessment for determination of remediation activities at the
Fort Hall EDB site. An effort to build community capacity to identify local environmental
problems and be involved in the implementation of activities, this project will focus on assessing
groundwater contamination by a chemical used on the Reservation for at least 20 years.
Valley Family Health Care, Inc. $19,986
The project would be to increase environmental awareness among Hispanic migrant and seasonal
agricultural workers by addressing issues including pesticides, hazardous substances, safe drinking
water, and reducing water pollution.
Oregon
Ecumenical Ministries of Oregon — ROSS $20,000
The Russian Oregon Social Services will lead an educational effort focused on the Russian
speaking community of the Portland Metro area about the dangers of eating fish from the main
stem of the Willamette and Lower Columbia rivers.
Portland Art Museum —NW Film Center $20,000
This project would focus on the production of a half hour video documentary about neighbors
from some of the poorest, and ethnically diverse neighborhoods in the city as they address one of
their environmental concerns by monitoring their own air shed.
-------
32
Urban League of Portland $20,000
A Lead Poisoning Prevention Program to help low-income families with young children in North
and Northeast Portland, who are most at-risk to elevated exposure to lead, make informed and
responsible decisions about exposure to lead. This project will include outreach using culturally
appropriate information, community presentations, and mass media outlets, to reach an estimated
audience of 30,000 residents.
Heritage College $20,000
Groundwater Testing in the Toppenish Basin of the Yakama Indian Reservation to monitor the
health of humans and wildlife. This project would be another step towards allowing the
community to obtain information on the environmental concerns threaten their community.
Northwest Communities Education Center $11,300
This project would focus on the greater Yakima area, targeting a predominately migrant farm
laborer and Hispanic community, who would benefit from an educational campaign on proper
disposal of household hazardous waste.
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance $18,833
Based on past success of targeting diverse communities for environmental education efforts in
their primary languages, this project would focus on the production of a Safe Seafood Video
Project in eight Asian/Pacific Islander languages and Spanish. This allows non-native English
speakers to receive and understand information about the environmental threats directly effecting
their families.
Tacoma Urban League, Inc. $20,000
The target of this project would be risk communication, in an effort to empower and improve
dialogue with the Salishan low-income and disadvantaged community of Tacoma. Residents will
also be educated about household practices that are chemically of biologically hazardous to their
health and how they can take necessary measures to maintain a healthy Salishan community. .
-------
-------
MAJOR EVENTS OF THE EN\ __
NMENTAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT
1971
CEQ's annual report
acknowledges racial
discrimination adversely
affects urban poor and
the quality of their
environment.
A
1982
Warren County, North
Carolina demonstration
against PCB landfill.
1987
United Church of
Christ issues report entitled
Toxic Wastes and Race in
the United States.
1979
1983
1990
1990
Michigan Coalition Conference
releases Race and the Incidence
of Environmental Hazards
report.
1990
iy
Robert Bullard's study of an
affluent African American
community's attempt to block
the siting of a sanitary landfill
GAO report states that
3 of 4 hazardous waste
facilities in EPA Region 4
are in African American
communities.
~
Bullard publishes
Dumping in Dixie-
used as the first textbook
on environmental justice.
EPA Administrator establishes
the Environmental Equity
Workgroup.
1991
First National People
of Color Leadership
Summit inDC. adopts
the Principles of
Environmental Justice
1991
1992
EPA releases
Environmental Equity.
Reducing Risk for All
Communities report.
1992
EPA establishes Office
of Environmental
Justice
1992
1993
1993
EPA establishes the
National Environmental
Justice Advisory
Council.
1994
First of four meetings with
the Administrator on
environmental justice
issues.
National Law Journal
report, Unequal Environmental
Protection, alleges EPA
discrimination in enforcement.
Administrator Browner
makes environmental
justice an Agency
priority.
Interagency Symposium on
Health Research and
Needs to Ensure Environmental
Justice in Arlington, Virginia
1994
Clinton issues
Executive Order 12898
designating that 11 agencies
are accountable for
environmental justice.
1994
1994
University of
Massachusetts issues
study challenging
siting demographics.
1994
1995
First Interagency
Public Meeting on
Environmental Justice
in Atlanta, Georgia
1995
Interagency Working
Group on Environmental
Justice established.
UCC issues Toxic Waste
and Race Revisited,
strengthening association
between race and waste
facilities
Environmental Justice Strategies
due to the President
-------
PA51 Environmental Justice
Bibliography
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
Office of Environmental Justice (C'EJ) has developed.
, ail electronic environmental justice bibliography
as paixofits continuing efforts to promote
communication and public outreach.
The bibliography is a searchable database
that contains a range of information
related to environmental justice re-
sources- Users are able to search for the
names of government documents,, books, journal articles, newsletters,, arid;videotapes
related to a variety of environmental, justice .topics. The database'is designed., to- allow
users to specify a variety of criteria, such as tide, author, subject,, publisher, or'
EPA publication number, when searching for materials. To allow"
for more thorough.searches, each entry has been
assigned topical subject headings.
The environmental justice bibliography is a.work in. progress,,
and OEJ will continue to add information sources to:it_ Future-
versions of the bibliography will include^ help screens,
as well as functions to make searches more: efficients
The database can be downloaded through the World Wide Web it
http://www.ttemi. com/nejac/resource.litml
[f you do not have access to the World Wide Web and wish to receive
the datab ase on diskette, send a request to the address below.
To submit comments about, or provide additional references for,
the Environmental Justicz Bibliography, contact:
environmental justice. Biblio^raohv
O L
do Tetrs. Tech. EM inc.
1593 Spring Hill Road,. Suite 300
Vienna. Virginia 22182
nternet e-
iia.il: n2iac@Ltemi.c0m
^ 5
UJOW*'-
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BIBLIOGRAPHY
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
A. Philip Randolph Institute, Working for Environmental and Economic Justice and Jobs. (1976).
Abascal, Ralplf Santiago. "The Struggle for Environmental Justice: Legal Services Advocates
Tackle Environmental Poverty Law." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)459 (1995).
. "California Rural Legal Assistance and Environmental Justice." Chicano-Latino
Law Review, (v)14 (p)44 (Winter 1994).
"Access to Justice on Environmental Matters: A Case of Double Standards? - Greenpeace and
Others v Commission of the European Community." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)8 (n)l,
(p)l39 (1996).
Adams, John A. "The Mainstream Environmental Movement: Predominantly White Memberships Are
Not Defensible." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)25-27 (1992).
Adikema, Friday Chibembudu. "Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd., v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc.:
Broadening Citizen's Locus Standi." Southern University Law Review, (v)20 (n)l, (p)69
(Spring 1993).
Albrecht, S.L. "Equity and Justice in Environmental Decision Making: A Proposed Research
Agenda." Society and Natural Resources, (v)8 (n)l, (pp)67-72 (1995).
Allen, Leslie. "Who Should Control Hazardous Waste on Native American Lands?" Ecology Law
Quarterly, (v)14 (n)l, (pp)69-116 (1987).
Alley, Kelly D., Charles E. Faupel and Conner Bailey. "The Historical Transformation of a
Grassroots Environmental Group." Human Organization, (Spring 1996).
Almeida, Paul. "The Network for Environmental and Economic Justice in the Southwest: Interview
with Richard Moore." Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, (v)5 (n)l, (pp)21-54 (March 1994).
Alonso, W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University, (1964).
Alston, Dana, ed. We Speak for Ourselves: Social Justice, Race and Environment. Washington,
DC: Panos Institute, (1990).
Alston, Dana. "Black, Brown, Poor and Poisoned: Minority Grassroots Environmentalism and
the Quest for Eco-Justice." Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, (v)68 (1991).
. "Transforming a Movement: People of Color Unite at Summit Against Environmental
Racism." Sojourners, (v)21 (pp)30-31 (January 1992).
. "Transforming a Movement." Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)2 (p)l (Fall
1991).
"Alternative Policy Institute of the Center for Third World Organizing." Toxics and Minority
Communities: Issue PAC #2, (1986).
Ambler, Marjane. "On the Reservations: No Haste, No Waste." Planning, (v)57 (n) 11, (pp)26-29
(November 1991).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 2
American Association of Law Libraries, Environmental Equity Policy, Racism & Justice. Valencia,
CA: Duplicated by Mobiltape, (1994).
American Bar Association. Section of Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law, Forum
on Environmental Justice: April 29, 1994 Arlington, Texas, Arlington Hilton Hotel. Chicago,
IL: American Bar Association, (1994).
Anderson, Andy B. "Environmental Equity: Evaluating TSDF [Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facility] Siting Over the Past Two Decades." Waste Age, (pp)83-100 (July 1994).
Anderson, Christine Jezreela. The Hanford Nuclear Reservation and Radioactive Pollution in
the Columbia River Region: A Case of Environmental Racism; Possibilities for Environmental
Justice? Thesis (M.S.)—University of Oregon, (1994).
Anderson, J.E. "U.S. Population Distribution and the Location of Hazardous Waste Sites."
Population Association of America Annual Meeting, (April 1986).
Anderton, Douglas L. "Environmental Equity: The Demographics of Dumping." Demography, {v)31
(n)2, (1994).
Angel, Bradley. Toxic Threat to Indian Lands: A Greenpeace Report. San Francisco, CA: Greenpeace,
(1992).
Anonymous. "A Place at the Table: A Sierra Roundtable on Race, Justice, and the Environment."
Sierra, (v)78 (n)3, (p)50 (1993).
. "Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability with Environmental Justice."
National Wildlife Federation, (April 1994).
. "Environmental Policy Tainted by Racism: The Year in Review." The National Law
Journal, (v)15 (n)17-18, (p)S4,col.l (December 1992).
Anthony, Carl. "Why African Americans Should be Environmentalists." Racism Poverty and the
Environment, (v)l (p)5 (1990).
. "Rebuild the Cities: Urban Reconstruction." Earth Island Journal, {v) 7 (n)4,
(p)44 (Fall 1992).
Arrandale, Tom. "Environmentalism and Racism." Governing, (February 1992).
Asch, Peter and Joseph L. Seneca. "Some Evidence on the Distribution of Air Quality." Land
Economics, (v)54 (n)3, (pp)278-297 (1978).
Association of American Law Schools, Racism & Environmental Justice. Millersville, MD: Recorded
Resources Corp., (1994).
. 1996 AALS Annual Meeting: Environmental Justice, Parts 1-2. Recorded Resources
Corp., (1996).
Austin, D.F. Epidemiological Study of the Incidence of Cancer as Related to Industrial Emissions
in Contra Costa County, California. Report to the Environmental Protection Agency, (1984).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 3
Austin, Regina and Michael Schill. "Black, Brown, Poor and Poisoned: Minority Grassroots
Environmentalism and the Quest for Eco-Justice." Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy,
(v)l (n)l, (p)69 (1991).
Babcock, Hope. "Environmental Justice Clinics: Visible Models of Justice." Stanford Environmental
Law Journal, (v)14 (n)l, (p)3 (1995).
"Backyards, NIMBYs, [Not In My Back Yard] and Incinerator Sitings: Implications for Social
Movement Theory." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (p)25 (February 1993).
Bailey, Conner and Charles E. Faupel. "Environmental Justice: Mobilization of a Social Movement."
Proceedings of a Preconference of the 50th Annual Professional Agricultural Workers Conference,
Tuskegee University, (pp)51-60 (1993).
. "Movers and Shakers and PCB [Polychlorinated Biphenyl] Takers: Hazardous Waste
and Community Power." Sociological Spectrum, (v)13 (pp)89-115 (1992).
. "Environmentalism and Civil Rights in Sumter County, Alabama." Race and the Incidence
of Environmental Hazards, (pp)140-152 (1992).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and James H. Gundlach. "Environmental Politics in Alabama's
Blackbelt." In Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Ed. Robert
Bullard Boston, MA: South End Press, (1993).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and Kelly D. Alley. "Environmental Justice: Mobilization
of a Grassroots Social Movement." Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, (v)2 (n)4,
(P)3 (1994).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and Susan H. Holland. "Hazardous Wastes and Differing Perceptions
of Risk in Sumter County, Alabama." Society and Natural Resources, (v)V (pp)21-36 (1992).
Bailey, Conner, et al. "Environmental Justice and the Professional." In Environmental Justice:
Issues, Policies, and Solutions. Ed. Bunyan Bryant Washington, DC: Island Press, (1995).
Bari, J. and J. Kohl. "Environmental Justice: Highlander After Myles." Social Policy, (v)21
(n)3, (pp)71-77 (Winter 1991).
Barkham, J.P. "Environmental Needs and Social Justice." Biodiversity and Conservation, (v)4
(n)8, (p)857 (November 1995).
Barnett, P.G. Survey of Research on the Impacts of Pesticides on Agricultural Workers and
the Rural Environment, Working Paper No. 2. Davis, CA: California Institute of Rural
Studies, (1989).
Barry, Tom and Beth Sims. The Challenge of Cross Border Environmentalism: The U.S.-Mexico
Case. The Inter-Hemispheric Education Resource Center, Resource Center Press and Border
Ecology Project, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 4
Barsh, R. "Indigenous Peoples, Racism and the Environment." Meanjin, (v)49 (n)4, (pp)723-731
(Summer 1990).
Basquet, C.R. "Socioeconomic Factors and Cancer Incidence Among Black and Whites." Journal
of the National Cancer Institute, (v)83 (pp)551-557 (1991).
Baugh, Joyce A. and John H. Baugh. "African-Americans and the Environment: A Review Essay."
Policy Studies Journal, (v)19 (n)2, (pp)182-191 (1991).
Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. Economics, Environmental Policy, and the Quality of Life. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, (1979).
Beasley, Conger and J.C. Leacock. "Of Pollution and Poverty (Part III)." Buzzworm: The Environmental
Journal, (v)2 (pp)39-45 (September/October 1990).
Beasley, Conger. "Of Pollution and Poverty." Buzzworm: The Environmental Journal, (v)2 (n)3,
(pp) 10-17 (May/June 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty (Part II)." Buzzworm: The Environmental Journal, (v)2
(n)5, (pp)38-46 (September/October 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Reaping America's Unseemly Harvest." Buzzworm, (v)2
(n)3, (pp)40-47 (May/June 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Keeping Watch in Cancer Alley." Buzzworm, (v)2 (n)4,
(pp)39-45 (July/August 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Deadly Threat on Native Lands." Buzzworm, (v)2 (n)5,
(pp)39-45 (September/October 1990).
Been, Vicki. "What's Fairness Got to Do With It?: Environmental Justice and the Siting of
Locally Undesirable Land Uses." Cornell University Law Review, (v)78 (n)6, (pp)1001-1085
(September 1993).
. "Analyzing Evidence of Environmental Justice." Journal oflMnd Use & Environmental
Law, (v)ll (n)l, (p)l (1995).
. "Locally Undesirable Land Uses in Minority Neighborhoods: Disproportionate Siting
or Market Dynamics?" Yale Law Journal, (v)103 (n)6, (pp)1383-1422 (April 1994).
Belliveau, Michael, Michael Kent and Grant Rosenblum. Richmond at Risk: Community Demographics
and Toxic Hazards from Industrial Polluters. San Francisco, CA: Citizens for a Better
Environment, (1989).
Beloff, Michael. "The Injunction in Environmental Law." The New Law Journal, (v)142 (n)6545,
(p)428 (March 1992).
Bembry, L. and R. Woerner. "Environmental Justice - The New Kid on the Block." Journal of
Forestry, (v)92 (n)9, (p)68 (1994).
Bennet, James. "Hispanic Voters and the Politics of Sludge." New York Times, 5 March 1993,
(p)Bl.
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 5
Berkovitz, Dan M. "Pariah and Prophets: Nuclear Energy, Global Warming, and Intergenerational
Justice." Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, (v)17 (n)2, (p)245 (1992).
Binder, Denis. "Index of Environmental Justice Cases." The Urban Lawyer, (v)27 (n)l, (p)163
(Winter 1995).
"Black, Brown, Red, and Poisoned." The Humanist, (v)54 (n)4, (p)9 (July 1994).
Blackman, Stephen Edward. "Bad Faith and the EAJA: A Proposal for Strict Scrutiny of Government
Fee Litigation Under the EAJA [Equal Access to Justice Act]," Environmental Law, (v)20
(n)4, (p)975 (1990).
Blank, Linda D. "Seeking Solutions of Environmental Inequity: The Environmental Justice Act."
Environmental Law, (v)24 (n)3, (pp)l 109-1136 (July 1994).
Blowers, Andrew and Leroy Pieter. "Power, Politics and Environmental Inequality: A Theoretical
and Empirical Analysis of the Process of 'Peripheralisation'." Environmental Politics,
(v)3 (n)2, (pp) 197-229 (Summer 1994).
Boerner, Christopher and Thomas Lambert. Environmental Justice. St. Louis, MO: Center for
the Study of American Business, Washington University, (1994).
. "Environmental Injustice." Public Interest, (v)118 (pp)61-83 (Winter 1995).
Boerner, Christopher. Environmental Justice in the City of St. Louis: the Economics of Siting
Industrial and Waste Eacilities. St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
Washington University, (1994).
. Environmental Justice? St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
Washington University, (1994).
Bond, Richard G. Salvationists, Utilitarians, and Environmental Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Ramapo
College, (1976).
. "Salvationists, Utilitarians, and Environmental Justice." Alternatives, (v)6
(n)3,(p)31 (1977).
Booth, Annie L. and Harvey M. Jacobs. "Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation
for Environmental Consciousness." Environmental Ethics, (v)12 (n)l, (pp)27-43 (1990).
Boulard, G. "Combating Environmental Racism." Christian Science Monitor, (v)17 (p)8 (March
1993).
Bowden, Holly J. Environmental Justice in Contemporary American Politics. Norton, MA: Wheaton
College, (1995).
Bowen, W., M. Sailing and E. Cryan. "The Spatial Association between Race, Income and Industrial
Toxic Emissions in Cuyahoga County, Ohio." Annual Meeting of the Association of American
Geographers, Atlanta, (May 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 6
Bowyer, and Luke W. Cole. "Pesticides and the Poor in California." Race, Poverty and the
Environment, (v)2 (1992).
Boyce, J.K. "Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation." Ecological Economics, (v)l 1
(n)3, (pp) 169-178 (December 1994).
Boyle, E.P. "It's Not Easy Being Green: The Psychology of Racism, Environmental Discrimination,
and the Argument for Modernizing Equal Protection." Vanderbilt Law Review, (v)6 (n)4,
(pp)937-989 (May 1993).
Braden, Anne. "Environmental Justice = Social Justice." Labor Research Review, (n)20, (p)63
(Spring 1993).
Braile, Robert. "Is Racism a Factor in Siting Undesirable Facilities?" Garbage, (v)6 (n)2,
(pp)13-17 (Summer 1994).
Brajer, J. "Recent Evidence on the Distribution of Air Pollution Effects." Contemporary Policy
Issues, (v)10 (April 1992).
Brigham, E.F. "The Determinants of Residential Land Use." Land Economics, (v)41 (n)4, (pp)325-334
(1965).
Brion, Denis J. "An Essay on LULU [Locally Unwanted Land Use], NIMBY [Not In My Back Yard]
and the Problem of Distributive Justice." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,
(v)15 (n)3-4, (p)437 (Spring 1988).
Brown, Alice L. "Environmental Justice and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (The
Fair Housing Act)." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)741 (1995).
. "Environmental Justice: New Civil Rights Frontier." Trial, (v)29 (n)7, (p)48
(July 1993).
Brown, Phil and Edwin J. Mikelson. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, (1990).
Brown, Phil. Society and Health Working Group, Boston Massachusetts. (February 1994).
Browne, . "The Summit that Changed the Color of Environmentalism." Panoscope, (v)28 (pp)21-22
(1992).
Bruce, Calvin E. "Environmentalism and Student Activism." Black Collegian, (v)23 (n)4, (p)52
(March/April 1993).
Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai, eds. Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time
for Discourse. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1992).
Bryant, Bunyan, ed. Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions. Washington,
DC: Island Press, (1995).
Bryant, Bunyan. "Pollution Prevention and Participatory Research as a Methodology for Environmental
Justice." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)589 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 7
Bryant, Pat. "Tenants and Toxics." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)27 (Winter 1993).
. "Toxics and Racial Justice." Social Policy, (v)20 (n)l, (pp)48-53 (Summer 1989).
Bullard, Robert D. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Boston,
MA: South End Press, (1993).
. In Search of the New South: The Black Urban Experience in the 1970s and 1980s.
Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, (1991).
. "The Politics of Race and Pollution: An Interview with Robert Bullard." Multinational
Monitor, (v)13 (n)6, (pp)22-25 (June 1992).
. "Environmental Justice for All: It's the Right Thing to Do." Journal of Environmental
Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)281 (1994).
. Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco,
CA: Sierra Club Press, (1994).
. "The Threat of Environmental Racism." Natural Resources and Environment, (v)7
(n)3, (pp)23-26 (1993).
. "Solid Waste Sites and the Black Houston Community." Social Inquiry, (v)53 (pp)273-288
(1983).
. "Environmental Racism." Environmental Protection, (v)2 (n)4, (pp)25-26 (June
1991).
. "Ecological Inequities and the New South: Black Communities Under Siege." Journal
of Ethnic Studies, (v)17 (n)4, (pp) 101-115 (1990).
. "Environmental Justice for All." EnviroAction, (November 1991).
. "Just Transportation." Environmental Action, (v)28 (n)l, (p)19 (Spring 1996).
. "Waste and Racism: A Stacked Deck?" Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy,
(v)8 (pp)29-45 (Spring 1993).
. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview
Press, (1994).
. Invisible Houston: The Black Experience in Boom and Bust. College Station, TX:
Texas A&M University Press, (1987).
. "Environmental Disputes Resolution in Communities of Color." In Technology and
Environmental Interdisplinary Perspectives. Eds. Henry Gamery and James R. Fleming Akron,-
OH: University of Akron Press, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 8
. "Urban Infrastructure: Social, Environmental and Health Risks to African Americans."
The State of Black America, (1992).
. "Grassroots Flowering: The Environmental Justice Movement Comes of Age." The
Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (pp)32-37 (Spring 1994).
. People of Color Environmental Groups Directory 1994-95. Flint, MI: Charles Stewart
Mott Foundation, (1994).
. "In Our Backyards: Minority Communities Get Most of the Dumps." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp)l 1-12 (March/April 1992).
. "Race and Environmental Justice in the United States." The Yale Journal of International
Law, (v)18 (n)l, (p)319 (Winter 1993).
. "Overcoming Racism in Environmental Decision Making." Environment, (v)36 (n)4,
(p)10 (May 1994).
. "Environmental Racism and Land Use." Land Use Forum: A Journal of Law, Policy,
& Practice, (v)2 (pp)6-11 (Spring 1993).
Bullard, Robert D. and Beverly H. Wright. "The Politics of Pollution: Implications for the
Black Community." Phylon, (v)47 (n)l, (pp)71-78 (1986).
. "The Quest for Environmental Equity: Mobilizing the African-American Community
for Social Change." Society and Natural Resources, (v)3 (pp)301-311 (1990).
. "Environmentalism and the Politics of Equity: Emergent Trends in the Black Community."
Mid-America Review of Sociology, (v)12 (pp)21-37 (1987).
. "Mobilizing the Black Community for Environmental Justice." Journal of Inter group
Relations, (v)17 (n)l, (p)33 (Spring 1990).
. "Environmental Justice for All: Community Perspectives on Health and Research
Needs." Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (p)821 (1993).
. "Blacks and the Environment." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, (v)14 (n)l/2,
(pp) 165-184 (1987).
. "Blacks and the Environment." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, (v)14 (pp)165-84
(1987).
Bullard, Robert D. and Joe R. Reagin. "Racism and the City." In Urban Life in Transition.
Eds. Mark Gottdiener and C.G. Pickvance Newbury Park, CA: Sage,.
Burbank, . "Activists of Color are Confronting Environmental Racism." National Catholic Reporter,
(p)7 (October 1991).
Burch, William R. Jr. "The Peregrine Falcon and the Urban Poor: Some Sociological Interrelations."
In Human Ecology: An Environmental Approach. Eds. P. Richardson and J. McEvoy Belmont,
CA: Duxbury Press, (1976).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 9
Burke, Lauretta M. Environmental Equity in Los Angeles, Technical Report 93-6. Santa Barbara,
CA: National Center for Geographic Information & Analysis, Technical Report, (1993).
. "Race and Environmental Equity: A Geographic Analysis in Los Angeles." Geo Info
Systems, (v)3 (n)9, (pp)44-50 (October 1993).
Buttel, Frederick H. and William L. Flinn. "Social Class and Mass Environmental Beliefs:
A Reconsideration." Environment and Behavior, (v)l (pp)433-450 (1978).
Button, Gregory V. "What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You: The Right to Know and the Shetland
Island Oil Spill." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, (v)23 (n)2, (pp)241-263
(June 1995).
Byron, William J. Toward Stewardship: An Interim Ethic of Poverty, Power, and Pollution.
New York, NY: Paulist Press, (1975).
Cable, Sherry and Michael Benson. "Acting Locally: Environmental Injustice and the Emergence
of Grass-Roots Environmental Organizations." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)4, (p)464 (November
1993).
Cable, Sherry and Thomas Shriver. "Production and Extrapolation of Meaning in the Environmental
Justice Movement." Sociological Spectrum, (v)15 (n)4, (p)419 (October 1995).
California State Legislature, Senate, Urban Growth Policy Project, Prosperity, Equity, and
Environmental Quality: Meeting the Challenge of California's Growth: Final Findings
and Recommendations. (1991).
Camia, Catalina. "Poor, Minorities Want Voices in Environmental Choices." Congressional Quarterly
Weekly Report, (v)51 (n)34, (August 1993).
Canadian Environmental Network, The Green List: A Guide to Canadian Environmental Organizations
and Agencies. Ottawa, Ontario: The Canadian Environmental Network, (1994).
Capek, Stella M. "The "Environmental Justice" Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application."
Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (p)5 (February 1993).
. "Section On Environmental Health Policy: Environmental Justice. Regulation,
and the Local Community." International Journal of Health Services, (v) 22 (n)4, (p)729
(1992).
Capeless, Rosanne Gervasi. "History of Florida Water Law: Tracing the Ebb and Flow of Florida's
Public Trust Doctrine." Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, (v)9 (n)l, (p) 131 (Fall
1993).
Carkeek, Jennifer Dawn. Environmental Justice: Does It Exist in the United States? Thesis
(B.A. Honors—Economics)~Bucknell University, (1995).
Carnes, S.A. and A.K. Wolfe. "Research and Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Justice:
Implications for NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] Documentation." National Association
of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and Exposition: Environmental Challenges
- The Next Twenty Years (20th), (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 10
Caron, Judi Anne. "Environmental Perspectives of Blacks: Acceptance of the 'New Environmental
Paradigm'." Journal of Environmental Education, (v)20 (n)3, (pp)21-26 (1989).
Carroll, Ginny. "When Pollution Hits Home." National Wildlife 29, (pp)30-39 (August/September
1991).
Cassel, Thomas A.V. and Terence P. Walmsley. "Environmental Justice in Hazardous Waste Siting."
Journal of Environmental Law & Practice, (v)2 (n)6, (p)48 (May 1995).
"Cause for Immediate Concern: Minorities and the Poor Clearly are More Exposed." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp)38-39 (March/April 1992).
Center for Investigating Reporting and Bill Moyers, Global Dumping Grounds: The International
Trade in Hazardous Waste. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press, (1990).
Centner, Terence J., Warren Kriesel and Andrew G. Keeler. "Environmental Justice and Toxic
Releases: Establishing Evidence of Discriminatory Effect Based on Race and Not Income."
Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal, (v)3 (n)2, (p) 119 (Summer 1996).
Cerrell Associates, Inc., Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting.
Prepared for the California Waste Management Board. California: Cerrell Associates,
Inc., (1984).
Chance, Norman A. and Elena N. Andreeva. "Sustainability, Equity, and Natural Resource Development
in Northwest Siberia and Arctic Alaska." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
(v)23 (n)2, (pp)217-242 (June 1995).
Chase, A.R. "Assessing and Addressing Problems Posed by Environmental Racism." Rutgers Law
Review, (v)45 (n)2, (pp)335-369 (Winter 1993).
Chavez, V. "A Native American Perspective: Our Land and Culture, Your Sensitivity and Respect."
OTHER VOICES - Environment, Community Development and Race, (v)l (Summer 1991).
Cheakalos, . "The Battle for 'Cancer Alley' Dumps." Atlanta Constitution, 23 February 1992,
(p)B4.
Chisolm, J. "The Continuing Hazard of Lead Exposure and Its Effects in Children." NeuroToxicology,
(v)5 (p)3 (1984).
Chu, . "Dangers in the Workplace." Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)3 (p)10 (Spring
1992).
Churchill, Ward. Struggle for the Land: Indigenous Resistance to Genocide, Ecocide, and Expropriation
in Contemporary North America. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, (1993).
Clayton, Susan. "Appeals to Justice in the Environmental Debate." The Journal of Social Issues,
(v)50 (n)3, (p)13 (1994).
Clean Sites, Hazardous Waste Sites and the Rural Poor: A Preliminary Assessment. (March
1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 11
Coggin, Terrance P. and John M. Seidl. Politics American Style: Race, Environment and Central
Cities. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, (1972).
Cohen, Gary. "Toward a Spirituality Based on Justice and Ecology." Social Policy, (v)26 (n)3,
(p)6 (Spring 1996).
Cohen, Line. "Waste Dumps Toxic Traps for Minorities." The Chicago Reporter, (v)21 (n)4,
(April 1992).
Cohen, Maurie J. "The Spatial Distribution of Toxic Chemical Emissions: Implications for
Nonmetropolitan Areas." Society and Natural Resources, (September 1995).
Cole, Luke W. "Environmental Justice Litigation: Another Stone in David's Sling." The Fordham
Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)523 (Spring 1994).
. "Community-Based Administrative Advocacy Under Civil Rights Law: A Potential
Environmental Justice Tool." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)360 (1995).
. "Legal Services, Public Participation, and Environmental Justice." Clearinghouse
Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)449 (1995).
. "Remedies for Environmental Racism: A View from the Field (response to Rachel
D. Godsil, Michigan Law Review, (v) 90, (p) 394)." Michigan Law Review, (v)90 (n)7, (pp)1991-1997
(June 1992).
. "Civil Rights, Environmental Justice and the EPA: The Brief History of Administrative
Complaints Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Journal of Environmental
Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)309 (1994).
. "Empowerment as the Key to Environmental Protection: The Need for Environmental
Poverty Law." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)19 (n)14, (pp)619-683 (1992).
Coleman, Leslie Ann. "It's the Thought That Counts: The Intent Requirement in Environmental
Racism Claims." St. Mary's Law Journal, (v)25 (n)l, (pp)447-492 (1993).
Collette, W. "Somewhere Else USA: Fighting Back Against Chemical Dumpers." Southern Neighborhoods,
(v)9 (pp)l-3 (September 1985).
Collin, Dave. "Confronting Environmental Racism." Industrial Worker, (v)88 (p)10 (October
1991).
Collin, Robert W. "Environmental Equity: Law and Planning Approach to Environmental Racism."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v) 11 (pp)495-546 (Summer 1992).
. "Environmental Equity and the Need for Government Intervention." Environment,
(v)35 (n)9, (p)41 (November 1993).
. "Review of the Legal Literature on Environmental Racism, Environmental Equity,
and Environmental Justice." Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)l, (p)121
(1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 12
Collin, Robert W., Timothy Beatley and William Harris. "Environmental Racism: A Challenge
to Community Development." Journal of Black Studies, (v)25 (n)3, (pp)354-377 (January
1995).
Collins, S.S. "Environmental Justice: The Role of Epidemiology in Protecting Unempowered
Communities from Environmental Hazards." Science of the Total Environment, (v)184 (n)(l-2),
(pp)67-76 (1996).
Colopy, James H. "The Road Less Traveled: Pursuing Environmental Justice Through Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Stanford Environmental Law Journal, (v)13 (n)l, (p)125
(January 1994).
Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Politics, Endangered Peoples: Indigenous
Rights and the Environment. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado, (1994).
Colquette, Kelly M. and Elizabeth A. Henry Robertson. "Environmental Racism: The Causes,
Consequences, and Commendations." Tulane Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (pp) 153-207
(1991).
Colten, C. "Historical Hazards: The Geography of Relic Industrial Wastes." The Professional
Geographer, (v)42 (n)2, (pp)149-161 (1990).
Constanza, Chuck. Environmental Justice. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures,
(1995).
Coplan, K. "Protecting Minority Communities with Environmental Civil Rights Claims." New
York Law Journal, (August 1991).
Corburn, Jason. Pursuing Justice in Environmental Decision Making: Deliberative Democracy
and Consensus Building. Thesis (M.C.P.)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1996).
Cordera-Guzman, Hector R. "Lessons from Operation Bootstrap." NACLA Report on the Americas,
(v)27 (n)3, (p)7 (November/December 1993).
"Corporate Power and the Struggle for Environmental and Economic Justice." Beyond Law: Mas
Alia Del Derecho, (v)4 (n)12, (p)105 (April 1995).
Coughlin, S.S. "Environmental Justice: The Role of Epidemiology in Protecting Unempowered
Communities from Environmental Hazards." Science of the Total Environment, (v)184 (n)l,
(p)67 (May 1996).
Council of Planning Librarians, Environmental Discrimination: An Annotated Bibliography.
Council of Planning Librarians Bibliography Series no.306,.
"Cover Story. Tax Justice for the Earth." Friends of the Earth, (v) 24 (n)3, (p)7 (March 1994).
Coye, M.J. "The Health Effects of Agricultural Production: 1. The Health of Agricultural
Workers." Journal of Public Health Policy, (v)6 (pp)349-370 (1985).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 13
Crawford, Colin. "Strategies for Environmental Justice: Rethinking CERCLA Medical Monitoring
Lawsuits." Boston University Law Review, (v)74 (n)2, (p)267 (March 1994).
Cushman, John H. "EPA's New Focus on Threat to the Poor." New York Times, (January 1992).
Cutter, Susan L. "Race Class and Environmental Justice." Progress in Human Geography, (v)19
(n)l, (pp)107-118 (1995).
Cutter, Susan L. and William Solecki. "The National Pattern of Airborne Toxic Releases."
The Professional Geographer, (v)41 (n)2, (pp)149-161 (1989).
Cutter, Susan L., Danika Holm and Lloyd Clark. "The Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring
Environmental Justice." Risk Analysis: An International Journal, (v)16 (n)4, (p)517
(August 1996).
Cvetkovitch, George and Timothy C. Earle. "The Construction of Justice: A Case Study of Public
Participation in Land Management. (Green Justice: Conceptions of Fairness and the Natural
World)." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (n)3, (pp)161-179 (Fall 1994).
Davies, J. Clarence and Barbara S. Davies. The Politics of Pollution, 2nd, Edition. Indianapolis,
IN: Pegasus, (1975).
Davies, J.E. "Problems of Prevalence of Pesticide Residues in Humans." Pesticide Monitoring
Journal, (v)2 (p)86 (1968).
Davos, Climis A. "Group Environmental Preference Aggregation: The Principle of Environmental
Justice." Journal of Environmental Management, (v)22 (n)l, (p)55 (1986).
Day, Barbara. "Environmental Racism Puts Toxics in Communities of Color." Guardian, (v)42
(p)5 (April 1990).
. "Do You Have to be White to be Green." Earth Island Journal, (v)6 (p)41 (Spring
1991).
De La Pena, Nonny. "Fighting for the Environment." Hispanic, (pp) 18-23 (March 1991).
De-Shalit, A. "Environmental Policies and Justice Between Generations: On the Need for a
Comprehensive Theory of Justice Between Generations." European Journal of Political Research,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)307 (April 1992).
Denno, Deborah W. "Considering Lead Poisoning as a Criminal Defense." Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)20 (n)3, (pp)377-400 (1993).
Denton, N.A. and D.S. Massey. "Residential Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians by
Socioeconomic Status and Generation." Social Science Quarterly, (v)69 (n)4, (pp)797-817
(1988).
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station,
Auburn University, "Public Opinions and Attitudes Regarding Hazardous Waste in Alabama:
Results from Three 1988 Surveys." Rural Sociology Series No. 14, (p)128 (September 1989).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 14
Derman, Bill and Anne Ferguson. "Human Rights, Environment, and Development: The Dispossession
of Fishing Communities on Lake Malawi." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
(v)23 (n)2, (pp) 125-143 (June 1995).
Derr, P., et al. "Responding to the Double Standard of Worker/Public Protection." Environment,
(v)25 (n)6, (1983).
DiChiro, Giovanna. "Defining Environmental Justice: Womens' Voices and Grassroots Politics."
Socialist Review, (v)22 (n)4, (p)93 (October 1992).
Dinkins, Carol E. "Impact of the Environmental Justice Movement on American Industry and Local
Government." Administrative Law Review, (v)47 (n)3, (p)337 (Summer 1995).
Discrimination American Style: Institutional Racism and Sexism, 2nd Edition. Malabar, FL:
Krieger Publishing Co., (1978).
Doll, R. and R. Peto. "The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of
Cancer in the United States Today." Journal of the National Cancer Institute, (v)66 (pp) 1193-1308
(1981).
Dowie, Mark. "The New Environmentalism." Utne Reader, (v)52 (pp) 104-111 (July/August 1992).
Doyle, Kevin. "Environmental Justice: A Growing Movement." The Black Collegian, (v)24 (n)4,
(p)36 (March 1994).
Dubin, Jon C. "From Junkyards to Gentrification: Explaining a Right to Protective Zoning
in Low-Income Communities of Color." Minnesota Law Review, (v)77 (n)4, (pp)739-801 (April
1993).
Durett, Dan. Environmental Justice: Breaking New Ground. Washington, DC: Committee of the
National Institute for the Environment, (1994).
"EPA Watch." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)10, (p)445A (October 1995).
Easterling, J. Bennett and James S. Poles. "Environmental Justice: Implications for Siting
of Federal Radioactive Waste Management Facilities." Proceedings of the 5th Annual International
Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management. Part 1 (of 4) Las Vegas, NV, (1994).
Easton, Billy. "WHEACT for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)24 (n)4, (p)31 (Winter 1993).
Eckholm, E. and J. Scherr. "Double Standards and the Pesticide Trade." New Scientist, (v)77
(pp)221-243 (1978).
Ecologist, Whose Common Future: Reclaiming the Commons. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers,
(1993).
Edelstein, Michael R. "Global Dumping Ground." Multinational Monitor, (v)ll (pp)26-29 (October
1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 15
. Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential
Toxic Exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1987).
Edwards, Alan F. Environmental Protection, Accountability, and Social Justice: An Analysis
of Environmental Mediation. Thesis (Honors)-College of William and Mary, (1988).
Edwards, Mencer Donahue. "Sustainability and People of Color." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)4, (pp)50-52
(September/October 1992).
Eichstaedt, Peter H. If You Poison Us: Uranium and Native Americans. Santa Fe, NM: Red
Crane Books, (1994).
Ellis, Ralph D. "Quantifying Distributive Justice: An Approach to Environmental and Risk-Related
Public." Policy Sciences, (v)26 (n)2, (p)99 (May 1993).
Ember, Lois R. "EPA Giving Increased Priority to Environmental Equity Issues." Chemical &
Engineering News, (v)72 (n)4, (pp)22-24 (January 1994).
. "Minorities Still More Likely to Live Near Toxic Sites." Chemical & Engineering
News, (v)72 (n)36, (p)19 (September 1994).
"Empowerment Lawyering: The Role of Trial Publicity in Environmental Justice." Boston College
Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23 (n)3, (p)567 (Spring 1996).
Environmental Careers Organization, Beyond the Green: Redefining and Diversifying the Environmental
Movement. (1992).
Environmental Health Coalition, Toxic-Free Neighborhoods Community Planning Guide. San Diego,
CA: Environmental Health Coalition, (1993).
"Environmental Justice Advanced by Executive Order." Chemical Week, (v)154 (n)7, (p)15 (February
1994).
Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: Greenpeace, (1995).
Environmental Justice Cases: Cases Involving Challenges to Environmental Decisions that Raise
Claims of Race or National Origin Discrimination. Washington, DC: Lawyers' Committee
for Civil Rights Under Law, (1993).
Environmental Justice News. Washington, DC: General Board of Church and Society of the United
Methodist Church, (1993).
Environmental Justice Project. Legal Forum, Civil Rights and the Environment: Bridging the
Disciplines: The Environmental Justice Project of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights
Under Law. Washington, DC: Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, (1993).
Environmental Justice Transition Group, Recommendations to the Presidential Transition Team
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Environmental Justice. Washington, DC:
The Group,(1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 16
"Environmental Justice: An Issue for States." Proceedings of the 1996 7th Annual International
Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management, (1996).
"Environmental Justice: Racial Gerrymandering for Environmental Siting Decisions." Virginia
Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)665 (1995).
"Environmental Justice: Special Section." The Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (pp)32-43 (1994).
Environmental Justice: The 1993 Quinn, Ward, Kershaw Environmental Symposioum. Baltimore,
MD: University of Maryland School of Law, (1993).
"Environmental Justice: The Department of Energy's Response to Executive Order 12898." Proceedings
of the 1996 7th Annual International Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management Las
Vegas, NV, (pp)483-484 (1996).
Environmental Justice. Chicago, IL: National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc., (1995).
Environmental Quality and Social Justice in Urban America. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation,
(1974).
"Environmental Racism Claims Brought Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act." Environmental
Law, (v)25 (n)2, (p)285 (1995).
Environmental Rights: Law, Litigation & Access to Justice. London: Cameron May, (1995).
Environmental Risk, Environmental Values, and Political Choices: Beyond Efficiency Trade-offs
in Public Policy Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1993).
Epstein, Joel J. Law Enforcement Response to Environmental Crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, (1995).
Erickson, Kai. A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community.
New York, NY: W.W. Norton, (1994).
Ervin, Mike. "Company Will Not Build Plant; Lawyers Hail Victory. (Formosa Plastics Corp.
Will Not Add Another Factory to Louisiana's 'Cancer Alley')." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)7, (p)3 (October 1992).
. "The Toxic Doughnut: Toxic Wastes in Minority Neighborhoods." Progressive, (v)56
(n)l, (p)15 (January 1992).
"Ethnic Minorities - An Environmental Issue?" Ecos, (v)9 (n)3, (p)2 (1988).
"European Court of Justice: Case Reports." European Environmental Law Review, (v)5 (n)6,
(p)188 (June 1996).
"European Court of Justice: Environmental Cases 1995." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)8
(n)l, (p) 191 (1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 17
Evans, Lara. "Safeguarding Sacred Lands: On Tour for Environmental Justice." Winds of Change:
A Magazine for American Indians, (v)10 (n)4, (p)28 (Fall 1995).
Everson, Roy Arnold. "Bellona: Champion of Environmental Justice." The Norseman, (v)30 (n)2,
(p)10 (March 1990).
Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman
& Littlefield, (1995).
"Facility Siting, Section of Natural Resources, Energy and Environmental Law." Natural Resources
& Environment, (v)7 (n)3, (Winter 1993).
Fagge, . "The Hazardous Waste Controversy and the Struggle for Change." In Environmental
Racism: Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Fahsbender, John H. "An Analytical Approach to Defining the Affected Neighborhood in the Environmental
Justice Context." New York University Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (n)l, (p)120 (1996).
Fairley, P. "Environmental Justice - Economics Blamed in St. Louis Siting Disparities Study."
Chemical Week, (v)25 (pp)8-8 (June 1995).
Faupel, Charles S., Conner Bailey and Gary Griffin. "Local Media Roles in Defining Hazardous
Waste as a Social Problem: The Case of Sumter County, Alabama." Sociological Spectrum,
(v)ll (n)4, (pp)293-319 (1991).
Ferrante, Maria A. "Exploring Oral Traditions, Environmental Awareness, and Peace and Justice."
The Catholic Library World, (v)63 (n)3, (p) 163 (January 1992).
Ferris, Deeohn. "New Public Policy Tools in the Grassroots Movement: The Washington Office
on Environmental Justice." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)711 (Summer
1995).
Filosa, Richard M. "United States v. Goodner Brothers Aircraft, Inc.: Environmental Justice
or Disaster?" New England Law Review, (v)28 (n)l, (p)133 (Fall 1993).
Finkel, Adam M. and Dominic Golding. "Alternative Paradigms: Comparative Risk is Not the
Only Model." EPA Journal, (pp)50-52 (January/February/March 1993).
Fischer, Michael L. "Building Bridges: Common Causes Unite the Environmental Justice Movement."
The National Voter, (pp) 13-14 (June/July 1993).
Fisher, Elizabeth. "Risk, Justice and Independent Contractors: The Demise of the Rule in
Rylands v. Gletcher in Australia." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)7 (n)2, (p)199 (1995).
Fisher, Maria Ramirez. "On the Road From Environmental Racism to Environmental Justice."
Villanova Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (n)2, (p)449 (1994).
Fisher, Michael. "Environmental Racism Claims Brought Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act."
Environmental Law, (v)25 (n)2, (pp)285-334 (Spring 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 18
Fitton, Laura. A Study of the Correlation Between the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities
and Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Alternatives,
(1992).
. Environmental Justice: Annotated Bibliography. Washington, DC: Center for Policy
Alternatives, (1994).
Flynn-Siler, Julia. '"Environmental Racism': It Could be a Messy Fight." BusinessWeek,
(p) 116 (May 1991).
"Focus. Environmental Equity: A New Coalition for Justice." Environmental Health Perspective:
ehp, (v)101 (n)6, (p)478 (November 1993).
Foreman Jr., Christopher H. "A Winning Hand?" The Brookings Review, (v)14 (n)2, (p)22 (Spring
1996).
"The Forum: The Assistant AG [Attorney General] for Environment." The Environmental Forum,
(v)ll (n)l, (p)40 (January 1994).
Foster, Sheila. "Race(ial) Matters: The Quest for Environmental Justice." Ecology Law Quarterly,
(v)20 (n)4, (p)721 (1993).
Freeman, A. Myrick. "The Distribution of Environmental Quality." Environmental Quality Analysis:
Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, (1972).
Freudenberg, N. "Citizen Action for Environmental Health: Report on a Survey of Community
Organizations." American Journal of Public Health, (v)74 (n)5, (pp)444-448 (1984).
Freudenburg, William R. and Susan K. Pastor. "NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard] and LULUs [Locally
Unwanted Land Use]: Stalking the Syndrome." Journal of Social Issues, (v)48 (n)4, (p)39
(Winter 1992).
Friedman-Jimenez, George. "Achieving Environmental Justice: The Role of Occupational Health."
The Fordham Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)605 (Spring 1994).
Fugazzotto, Peter. "Angling for Environmental Justice." Earth Island Journal, (v)9 (n)3,
(p)19 (Summer 1994).
Funk, William. "Justice Breyer and Environmental Law." The Administrative Law Journal of
the American University, (v)8 (n)4, (p)735 (Winter 1995).
Furino, and Munoz. "Health Status Among Hispanics." Journal of the American Medical Association,
(v)265 (p)255 (January 1991).
Galacatos, Theodora. "The United States Department of Justice Environmental Crimes Section:
A Case Study of Inter- and Intrabranch Conflict." Fordham Law Review, (v)64 (n)2, (p)587
(November 1995).
Garcia, Arnoldo. "Environmental Inequalities." Crossroads, (v)16 (pp)18-19 (June 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 19
Gardner, Florence Catherine. Environmental Justice Organizing and Economic Change in the Southern
United States. Thesis (M.A. in Geography)~University of California, Berkeley, (1993).
Gauna, Eileen. "Federal Environmental Citizen Provisions: Obstacles and Incentives on the
Road to Environmental Justice." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)22 (n)l, (p)l (1995).
Gay, Kathlyn. Pollution and the Powerless: The Environmental Justice Movement. New York,
NY: F. Watts, (1994).
Gaylord, Clarice and Elizabeth Bell. "Environmental Justice: A National Priority." In Faces
of Environmental Racism. Eds. P. Wenz and Westra L. Rowman Littlefield Publishers, Inc.,
(1995).
Gaylord, Clarice and Geraldine Trotty. "Protecting Endangered Communities." The Fordham Urban
Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)771 (1994).
Gaynor, Kevin R. "Frontier Justice." The Environmental Forum, (v)8 (n)2, (p)23 (March 1991).
Gedicks, Al. The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles Against Multinational
Corporations. Boston, MA: South End Press, (1994).
Gelobter, Michael. "Toward a Model of 'Environmental Discrimination'." In The Proceedings
of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, (1990).
. "The Meaning of Urban Environmental Justice." The Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)841 (Spring 1994).
. "The Distribution of Outdoor Air Pollution by Income and Race: 1970-1986." Masters
Thesis, Energy and Resource Group, (1988).
. The Distribution of Air Pollution by Income and Race. Berkeley, CA: University
of California, Master's Project, Energy and Resource Group, (1989).
. Race, Class, and Outdoor Air Pollution: The Dynamics of Environmental Discrimination
from 1970 to 1990. Dissertation, (1993).
George, D.B. "Wastewater Environmental Justice in Small Communities." 212th American Chemical
Society National Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA, (August 1996).
Geradin, Damien. "Free Trade and Environmental Protection in an Integrated Market: A Survey
of Case Law of the United States Supreme Court." Journal of Transnational Law & Policy,
(v)2 (n)l, (p)141 (Spring 1993).
Gerrard, Michael B. "The Role of Existing Environmental Legislation in the Environmental Justice
Movement." St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)555 (1994).
Gianessi, Leonard and Henry M. Peskin. "The Distribution of Federal Water Pollution Control
Policy in the U.S.." Land Economics, (v)l (1980).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 20
Gianessi, Leonard. "The Distributional Effects of Uniform Air Pollution Policy in the U.S.."
Quarterly Journal of Economics, (pp)281-301 (May 1979).
Gibbons, A. "Does War on Cancer Equal War on Poverty?" Science, (v)253 (p)260 (1991).
Gilbert, Debbie. "Environmental Racism: Why Hazardous Waste Has Become a Civil Rights Issue."
Memphis Flyer, (v)141 (pp)9-ll (October 31/November 6 1991).
Giordano, Toni. "Environmental Justice: How Does It Influence the Permitting Process." Journal
of Environmental Permitting, (v)4 (n)l, (p)25 (Winter 1994).
Glaser, James M. "Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in
the South." Journal of Politics, (v)56 (n)l, (pp)21-42 (February 1994).
Glick, Richard D. "Environmental Justice in the United States: Implications of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights." The Harvard Environmental Law Review: HELR,
(v)19 (n)l, (p)69 (1995).
Glickman, Theodore S. and Robert Hersh. Evaluating Environmental Equity: The Impacts of Industrial
Hazards on Selected Social Groups in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Washington, DC:
Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 95-13, (1995).
Godsil, Rachel D. "Remedying Environmental Racism." Michigan Law Review, (v)90 (n)2, (pp)394-427
(November 1991).
Godsil, Rachel D. and James S. Freeman. "Jobs, Trees, and Autonomy: The Convergence of the
Environmental Justice Movement and Community Economic Development." Maryland Journal
of Contemporary Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)25 (1993).
Goldberg, Dan. "The Quest for Environmental Quality." MSWManagement, (pp)27-33 (March/April
1992).
Goldman, Benjamin A. The Truth About Where You Live: An Atlas for Action on Toxins and Mortality.
New York, NY: Times Books, (1991).
. "What is the Future of Environmental Justice?" Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)122 (April
1996).
. "Combating Environmental Racism." Chemistry & Industry, (v)2 (pp)72-72 (1995).
. Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability With Environmental Justice. Washington,
DC: National Wildlife Federation, (1993).
Goldman, Benjamin A. and Laura J. Fitton. Toxic Waste and Race Revisited. Washington, DC:
Center for Policy Alternatives, NAACP, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice,
(1994).
Goldsmith, M.F. "As Farmworkers Help Keep America Healthy, Illness May Be Their Harvest."
Journal of the American Medical Association. (v)261 (pp)3207-3213 (1989).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 21
Goldstein,. "Indoor Air Pollution: Exposure of Low-Income Inner City Residents." Environmental
International, (v)12 (pp)211-219 (1986).
Goodwin, Ellie. "Nexus of a New Environmentalism." Christianity and Crisis, (v)52 (p)54 (March
1992).
Gott, Nancy Christine. Environmental Justice and Participatory Democracy: An Emancipatory
Policy Proposal. Thesis (M.A.)—University of Nevada, Las Vegas, (1995).
Gottlieb, Robert and Andrew Fisher. "First Feed the Face: Environmental Justice Community
Food Security." Antipode, (v)28 (n)2,
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 22
Grinde, Donald A. and Bruce E. Johansen. Ecocide of Native America: Environmental Destruction
of Indian Lands and People. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers, (1995).
Grossman, Karl. "From Toxic Racism to Environmental Justice." E: The Environmental Magazine,
(v)3 (n)3, (p)28 (May 1992).
. "Environmental Racism." Crisis, (v)98 (n)4, (pp)14-17 (1991).
Hahn-Baker, David. "Rocky Roads to Consensus." The Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (p)41 (Spring
1994).
Hair, Jay D. "Providing for Justice as Well as Jobs." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)2, (p)30
(February-March 1993).
. "The Right to a Clean, Safe Environment." National Wildlife, (p)26 (August/September
1991).
Hall, Annabel T. "Testing for Environmental Racism: Prejudice, Profits, Political Power?"
Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, (v)14 (n)l, (pp) 107-133 (Winter 1995).
Hamilton, James A. The Influence of Environmental Justice on the Dioxin Controversy. Thesis
(M.S.^-Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1996).
Hampson, Fen Osier and Judith Reppy. Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, (1996).
Handy, Femida. "Income and Air Quality in Hamilton, Ontario." Alternatives, (v)6 (n)3, (pp)18-24
(1977).
Hare, N. "Black Ecology." The Black Scholar, (v)6 (pp)2-8 (1970).
Harmon, . "Environmental Plight of Reservations Spurs Indians." Atlanta Constitution, 20
May 1992, (p)A3.
Harrington, Sharon Carr. Challenging Race Discrimination in Environmental Law and Policy Making.
(December 1992).
Harris, Cynthia H. and Robert C. Williams. "Research Directions: The Public Health Service
Looks at Hazards to Minorities." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)40-41 (March/April 1992).
Harrison, D. and D.L. Rubinfeld. "The Distribution of Benefits from Improvements in Urban
Air Quality." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, (v)5 (pp)313-32 (1978).
Harrison, D., Jr. Who Pays for Clean Air: The Cost and Benefit Distribution of Automobile
Emission Standards. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, (1975).
Hart, Stacy. "A Survey of Environmental Justice Legislation in the States." Washington University
Law Quarterly, (v)73 (n)3, (p)1459 (Fall 1995).
Hartley, Troy W. "Environmental Justice: An Environmental Civil Rights Value Acceptable to
All World Views." Environmental Ethics, (v)17 (n)3, (p)277 (Fall 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 23
Hasler, L. Claire. "The Proposed Environmental Justice Act: 'I Have a (Green) Dream'." University
of Puget Sound Law Review, (v)17 (n)2, (p)417 (Winter 1994).
Hawkins, Perry Denoa. Environmental Justice: A Statistical Model of Landfill Development
in Mississippi. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Mississippi, (1995).
Hayes, Arthur S. "New Specialty Helps Poor Fight Pollution." Wall Street Journal, 3 October
1991, (p)3.
Head, Gurrero. "Fighting Environmental Racism." New Solutions, (p)38 (Spring 1991).
Hecht, Susanna and Alexander Cockburn. "Land, Trees, and Justice: Defenders of the Amazon."
Nation, (pp)695-701 (May 1989).
Heiderscheit III, John W. "Recent Judicial Developments on Environmental Justice." St. John's
Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)599 (1994).
Heiman, Michael K. "Race, Waste, and Class: New Perspectives on Environmental Justice."
Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)lll (April 1996).
Henderson, Douglas A. "Counsel's Corner: Lender Liability for Environmental Contamination-
Recent Guidance from EPA and Department of Justice." Banking Law Journal, (v)113 (n)9,
(p)918 (October 1996).
Henry, Sarah. "Dumping on the Poor." California Lawyer, (v)15 (n)8, (p)54 (August 1995).
Hernandez, Richard and Edith Sanchez. Cross-Border Links: A Directory of Organizations in
Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Albuquerque, NM: Inter-Hemispheric Education
Resource Center, (1992).
Hernandez, Willie G. "Environmental Justice: Looking Beyond Executive Order No. 12898."
UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, (v)]4 (n)l, (p)181 (1995).
Herrman, Pauline. "Human Environmental Crisis and the Transnational Corporation: The Question
of Culpability." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, (v)23 (n)2, (pp)285-290
(June 1995).
Hersch, Robert. Race and Industrial Hazards: An Historical Geography of the Pittsburgh Region,
1900 -1990. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 95-18, (1995).
Hester, R. "Participatory Design and Environmental Justice-Pas-de-Deux or Time Change Partners."
Journal of Architectural and Planning Design, (v)4 (n)4, (pp)289-300 (1987).
Higgins, Robert R. "Race and Environmental Equity: An Overview of the Environmental Justice
Issue in the Policy Process." Polity, (v)26 (n)2, (p)281 (Winter 1993).
Hill, David, ed. The Quality of Life in America; Pollution, Poverty, Power, and Fear. New
York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, (1973).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 24
Hill, Kelly M. Environmental Justice: Getting Onto the Public Agenda. Thesis (M.A.)-Colorado
State University, (1996).
Hilts, Phillip. "White House Shuns Key Role on Lead Exposure." New York Times, 24 August
1991.
Hinds, C. "From the Front Lines of the Movement for Environmental Justice." Social Policy,
(v)22 (n)4, (pp) 12-22 (1992).
Hird, John A. "Environmental Policy and Equity: The Case of Superfund." Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, (v)12 (pp)323-343 (1993).
Hoffman, Brent L. "Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Business Friend and Environmental Foe?" Dickinson
Law Review, (v)100 (n)l, (p)211 (Fall 1995).
Holman, Jeremy Thomas. Seeking Environmental Justice: The Environmental Justice Movement
and the Environmental Justice Act of 1993. Internship report (M.S.)-Miami University,
(1995).
Horn, J., ed. SEER Program: Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States: J973 -
1981. Washington, DC: National Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, (1984).
Howarth, Richard B. "Intergenerational Justice and the Chain of Obligation." Environmental
Values, (v)l (n)2, (p)133 (Summer 1992).
Howell, Frank M. and John K. Thomas. "The Spatial Visualization of Environmental Equity:
Toward an Understanding of Conceptual and Methodological Issues." Annual Meeting of the
Mid-South Sociological Association, Lafayette, LA, (1994).
Howorth, Laura S. "Role of Religion in the Environmental Justice Movement." Proceedings of
the 9th 1995 Conference on Coastal Zone Conference Location: Tampa, FL, USA, (1995).
Human Rights & Environmental Justice. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, (1993).
Hurley, Andrew. Environmental Inequalities: Class, Race, and Industrial Pollution in Gary,
Indiana, 1945-1980. (1995).
. "The Social Biases of Environmental Change in Gary, Indiana, 1945 - 1980." Environmental
Review, (v)12 (n)4, (pp)l-19 (1988).
lake, Robert W. "Volunteers, NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard], and Environmental Justice: Dilemmas
of Democratic Practice." Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)160 (April 1996).
Imam, Jafar and James S. Poles. "Incorporating Environmental Justice Measures During Environmental
Impact Statement Scoping." Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on
High Level Radioactive Waste Management Las Vegas, NV, (1995).
Inconclusive by Design: Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Federal Environmental Health Research.
Boston, MA: National Toxics Campaign, (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 25
"Incorporating Environmental Justice into Environmental Decision Making." National Association
of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and Exposition: Environmental Challenges
- The Next Twenty Years (20th), (1995).
Ingram, Helen. "Managing Transboundary Resources: Lessons from Ambos Nogales." Environment,
(v)36 (n)4, (pp)28-38 (May 1994).
Inhaber, Herbert. "OF LULUs, NIMBYS, and NIMTOOs [Locally Unwanted Land Use, Not In My Back
Yard and Not In My Term Of Office]." Public Interest, (n)107, (p)52 (Spring 1993).
Institute for Southern Studies, "People of Color Forge a Movement for Environmental Justice.
Special Issue." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (Winter 1993).
Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology, Conference [on] Environmental
Crisis-International Justice. St. Louis, MO: The Institute, (April 1972).
"Interview: Fighting for Environmental Justice." Multinational Monitor, (v)17 (n)4, (p)15
(April 1996).
Israel, Brian D. "An Environmental Justice Critique of Risk Assessment." New York University
Environmental Law Journal, (v)3 (n)2, (p)469 (1995).
Jaffe, Susan. "Bhopal in the Backyard? When the Folks Next Door are Industrial Polluters,
It's Time for aChat." Sierra, (pp)52-53 (September/October 1993).
Jarman, M. Casey. "Environmental Justice, Hawaiian Style." Proceedings of the 9th 1995 Conference
on Coastal Zone Tampa, FL USA, (1995).
Jetter, Alexis. "The Poisoning of a Dream (Environmental Activist Patsy Ruth Oliver)." Vogue,
(v)183 (n)ll, (p)213 (November 1993).
Johnson, Dirk. "Indians'Water Quest Creates a New Foe: Environmentalists." New York Times,
(December 1991).
Johnson, James H. and Melvin L. Oliver. "Blacks and the Toxic Crisis." Western Journal of
Black Studies, (v)13 (n)2, (pp)72-78 (1989).
Johnson, Jennifer L. "Empowerment Lawyering: The Role of Trial Publicity in Environmental
Justice." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23 (n)3, (p)567 (1966).
Johnson, Kirsten. "Publics, Workers, and Parathion: Equity Hazard Management." Environment,
(v)24 (n)9, (pp)28-38 (1982).
Johnson, Pamela E. "Two Steps Forward on Environmental Justice." Environmental Health Perspectives,
(v)102 (n)10, (p)836 (1994).
Johnson, Stephen M. "Federal Regulation of Isolated Wetlands." Environmental Law, (v)23 (n)l,
(P)l (1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 26
Johnson, W.R. "Should the Poor Buy No Growth?" Daedalus, (v)102 (n)4, (pp)165-190 (1973).
Jones, Samaria A. Grassroots Organizing and Environmental Justice: Developing Environmental
Attitudes and Opinions in the African American Community. Thesis (M.A.M.C.)--University
of Florida, (1995).
Jones, Stephen C. "Inequities of Industrial Siting Addressed." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)50, (p)20 (August 1993).
. "EPA Targets Environmental Racism." National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)49, (p)28
(August 1993).
Jordan, Charles. "Diversification, Minorities, and the Mainstream Environmental Movement."
Voices from the Environmental Movement: Perspectives for a New Era, (1992).
"Justice Department is Drawing Fire For Too Few Prosecutions as House Subcommittees Investigate
Suspected Roadblocks." Chemical and Engineering News, (v)70 (n)39, (p)37 (September 1992).
Kain, J.F. "Journey-to-Work as a Determinant of Residential Location." Regional Science Association
Proceedings, (v)9 (pp)137-160 (1962).
Kaminstein, D.S. "Toxic Talk." Social Policy, (v)19 (n)2, (pp)5-10 (1988).
Kanner, Allan. "Environmental Justice, Torts and Causation." Washburn Law Journal, (v)34
(n)3, (p)505 (Summer 1995).
Karliner, Joshua. Toxic Empire: The WMX Corporation, Hazardous Waste, and Global Strategies
for Environmental Justice. San Francisco, CA: Political Ecology Group, (1994).
Kasperson, R.E. and K. Dow. "Developmental and Geographical Equity in Global Environmental
Change: A Framework for Analysis." Evaluation Review, (v)15 (n)l, (pp)149-171 (1991).
Kasperson, Roger E. "Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk
Communication." Risk Analysis, (v)6 (n)3, (pp)275-281 (1986).
Kates, Robert W. and Viola Haarman Kates. "Where the Poor Live?" Environment, (v)34 (n)4,
(pp)4-l 1-25-28 (1992).
Kazis, R. and R.L. Grossman. Fear at Work: Job Blackmail, Job and the Environment. New York,
NY: Pilgrim Press, (1982).
Keck, Margaret E. "Parks, People and Power: The Shifting Terrain of Environmentalism." NACLA
Report on the Americas, (v)28 (n)5, (p)36 (March 1995).
Keeva, Steve. "A Breath of Justice: Along With Equal Employment Opportunity and Voting, Living
Free from Pollution is Emerging as a New Civil Right." ABA Journal, (v)80 (p)88 (February
1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 27
Kelly, Anne L. "Reinvention in the Name of Environmental Justice: A View From State Government."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)769 (Summer 1995).
Kennedy, Daniel B. "Facility Site Selection and Analysis Through Environmental Criminology."
Journal of Criminal Justice, (v)18 (n)3, (p)239 (1990).
Kennedy, Rivera. "Pollution's Chief Victims: The Poor." New York Times, 15 August 1992,
(p)A19.
Kimerling, Judith. "The Environmental Audit of Texaco's Amazon Oil Fields: Environmental
Justice or Business as Usual?" Harvard Human Rights Journal, (v)7 (p)199 (Spring 1994).
Kin, C. Kijang. "Endangering Lives, Contaminating the Environment." Race, Poverty and the
Environment, (v)3 (p)8 (Spring 1992).
Kleinman, Joel C. "Infant Mortality Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups, 1983-1984." Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report, (v)39 (n)SS-3, (pp)31-39 (1990).
Kneese, Allen V. and Blair T. Bower. Environmental Quality Analysis. (1972).
Knickerbocker, . "The Environmentally Disenfranchised." The Christian Science Monitor, (v)84
(p)ll (May 1992).
Koenenn, . "Backyard Battle: Minorities, Environmental Groups Joining to Combat Racism."
Los Angeles Times, 2 January 1992, (p)7E.
Kraft, Michael E. and Denise Scheberle. "Environmental Justice and the Allocation of Risk:
The Case of Lead and Public Health." Policy Studies Journal, (v)23 (n)l, (p) 113 (1995).
Krieg, Eric. "A Socio-Historical Interpretation of Toxic Waste Sites: The Case of Greater
Boston." The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, (v)54 (n)l, (pp)l-14 (1995).
Kruvant, W.J. "People, Energy, and Pollution." The American Energy Consumer, (1975).
Kuehn, Robert R. "The Environmental Justice Implications of Quantitative Risk Assessment."
University of Illinois Law Review, (v)1996 (n)l, (p)103 (1996).
Kverndokk, Snorre. "Tradable C02 Emission Permits: Initial Distribution as a Justice Problem."
Environmental Values, (v)4 (n)2, (p)129 (May 1995).
Kyte, John R. "Environmental Justice: The Need for Equal Enforcement and Sound Science."
The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, (v)ll (n)l, (p)253 (Fall 1994).
Labalme, Jenny. A Road to Walk: A Struggle for Environmental Justice. Durham, NC: Regulator
Press, (1987).
Laduke, Winona. Environmental and Social Justice. (1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 28
Laituri, Melinda and Andrew Kirby. "Finding Fairness In American's Cities? The Search for
Environmental Equity in Everyday Life." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (p)121 (Fall
1994).
Lambert, Thomas. A Critique of "Environmental Justice". Washington, DC: National Legal Center
for the Public Interest, (1996).
Lampe, David. "The Politics of Environmental Equity." National Civic Review, (v)81 (n)l,
(p)27 (Winter-Spring 1992).
Land Use Forum, "Environmental Equity: Confronting Racial Injustice in Land Use Patterns."
Land Use Forum, (v)2 (n)l, (Winter 1993).
"The Lands the Feds Forgot." Sierra, (v)74 (pp)44-48 (May/June 1989).
Lavelle, Marianne and Marcia Coyle. "Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental
Law." National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)3, (September 1992).
Lavelle, Marianne. "Minority Activists are Split on Superfund." The National Law Journal,
(v)16 (n)25, (p)3, col 1 (1994).
. "Environmental Racism Targeted; Congressional Hearing." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)26, (p)3 (March 1993).
. "Transition Meets With Minorities: Environmental Activists." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)15, (p)3 (December 1992).
. "EPA Responds to Concerns of Minorities on Cleanups." The National Law Journal,
(v)16 (n)36, (p)A12,coll (1994).
. "Poor Residents Say EPA Hasn't Got the Lead Out; Broken Promises of Regulators
and the NAACP [Nat'l Assoc. for Advancement of Colored People] Litter the Ground Near
a Vacant Foundry." The National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)8, (p)al,col.2 (1994).
. "Discrimination Probe Planned; House Committee to Investigate Environmental Racism."
The National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)4, (p)l, col.2 (1992).
. "Greens and Companies Lose Leader; Did NAACP's [National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People] Ben Chavis Switch Sides, or Work to Bring Opponents Together?" The
National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)l, (p)Al,col.4 (1994).
. "Help Sought from 'Green' Justice Panel." The National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)9,
(p)A16,coll (1994).
. "Residents Want 'Justice,' The EPA Offers 'Equity'." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)3, (September 1992).
. "EPA Enforcement to be Probed." The National Law Journal, (April 1993).
"Law: Exxon is Indicted for the Alaska Spill." Time, (v) 135 (n)ll, (p)54 (March 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 29
Lawless, Paul T. "City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund: Justice Scalia's Evolution
of the Plain Meaning Approach." Northern Kentucky Law Review, (v)22 (n)l, (p)l 15 (Winter
1995).
Lazarus, Richard J. "The Reality of Environmental Law in the Prosecution of Environmental
Crimes: A Reply to the Department of Justice." The Georgetown Law Journal, (v)83 (n)7,
(p) 1539 (September 1995).
. "Pursuing "Environmental Justice": The Distributional Effects of Environmental
Protection." Northwestern University Law Review, (v)87 (n)3, (p)787 (Spring 1993).
. "The Meaning of Promotion of Environmental Justice." Maryland Journal of Contemporary
Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)l (1993).
. "Distribution in Environmental Justice: Is There a Middle Ground." St. John's
Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)481 (1994).
Lee Kerr, Mary and Charles Lee. "From Conquistadors to Coalitions." Southern Exposure, (v)21
(n)4, (p)8 (Winter 1993).
Lee, Charles. "The Integrity of Justice: Signs of Environmental Racism in Minority and Poor
Communities." Sojourners, (v)19 (n)2, (p)22 (February 1990).
. "Developing Working Definitions of Urban Environmental Justice." Earth Island
Journal, (v)8 (n)4, (p)39 (Fall 1993).
. "Beyond Toxic Wastes and Race." Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from
the Grassroots, (pp)41-52 (1993).
. "Developing the Vision of Environmental Justice: A Paradigm for Achieving Healthy
and Sustainable Communities." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)571
(1995).
. "Toxic Waste and Race in the United States." In Race and the Incidence of Environmental
Hazard: A Time for Disclosure. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai Boulder, CO: Waterview
Press, (1992).
. "From Montgomery to Emelle: The Continuing Struggle Over Disposal of Toxic Wastes."
elsa, (pp)29-33 (October 1984).
Lee, P. "Environmental Justice for Asians and Pacific Islanders." Race, Poverty and the Environment,
(v)3 (Spring 1992).
Legacy of Lead: America's Continual Epidemic of Childhood Lead Poisoning. Washington, DC:
Environmental Defense Fund, (1990).
Levenstein, Charles, Rafael Moure-Eraso and Margeret M. Quinn. "Occupational Health and Environmental
Justice: The Establishment of the Work Environment Justice Fund." New Solutions: A
Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy. (v)6 (n)2, (p)84 (Winter 1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 30
Levy, Barry S. "Health and Social Effects of Worldwide Economic Transformation: Focus on
Occupational and Environmental Health." Social Justice, (v)22 (n)4, (p)77 (Winter 1995).
Lewis, Jack. "An Indian Policy at EPA." EPA Journal, (v)12 (pp)23-26 (January/February 1986).
. "The U.S. Colonias: A Target for Aid." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)61-62 (March/April
1992).
Lewis, Victor. "A Message to White Environmentalists." Earth Island Journal, (v)7 (n)4, (p)41
(Fall 1992).
Licenberg, Gary S. "Lowered Intent Requirements in Environmental Crimes Cases: What You Don't
Know Can Hun You." Criminal Justice, (v)7 (n)2, (p)28 (Summer 1992).
Lincenberg, Gary S. "Hazardous Wastes of Time When the Crime is Environmental." Criminal
Justice, (v)9 (n)l, (p)20 (Spring 1994).
Lindgren, . "Smog Affects Poor, Young Non-White." Los Angeles Times, 21 May 1992, (p)8.
Link, Terry. "Environmental Racism/Environmental Equity: A Bibliography." Green Library
Journal: Environmental Topics in the Information World, (v)2 (n)l, (pp) 17-22 (1993).
Livingston, M.L. "Transboundary Environmental Degradation: Market Failure, Power, and Instrumental
Justice." Journal of Economic Issues, (v)23 (n)l, (p)79 (March 1989).
Logan, John R. "Growth, Politics and Stratification of Places." American Journal of Sociology,
(v)84 (pp)404-416 (1978).
Logan, John R. and Harvey L. Molotoch. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press, (1987).
Loibl, G. and P. Kustor. "Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice: 4th Session."
Environmental Policy and Law, (v)25 (n)6, (p)311 (November 1995).
Lopez, . "A Declaration of War by Any Other Means." Harvard Law Review, (v)98 (p)1667 (1985).
Lord, Charles P. "Environmental Justice Law and the Challenge Facing Urban Communities."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)721 (Summer 1995).
Lord, Charles P. and William A. Shutkin. "Environmental Justice and the Use of History."
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)22 (n)l, (1994).
Louisiana Advisory Commitee to the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights., The Battle for Environmental
Justice in Louisiana... Government, Industry, and the People. Kansas City, KS: U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights Regional Office, (September 1993).
Louisiana Department of Environmental Justice, Final Report to the Louisiana Legislature on
Environmental Justice. Baton Rouge, LA: The Department, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 31
Love, Sam. "Ecology and Social Justice: Is There a Conflict?" Environmental Action, (v)4
(pp)3-6 (August 1972).
Lundy-Wade, Eleanor. Black Women's Role in the Struggle for Environmental Justice. Thesis
(M.S.)--University of Wisconsin-Madison, (1993).
Luper-Foy, Steven. "Justice and Natural Resources." Environmental Values, (v)l (n)l, (p)47
(Spring 1992).
Lynch, Barbara Deutsch. "The Garden and the Sea: U.S. Latino Environmental Discourses and
Mainstream Environmentalism." Social Problems, (v)40 (p)108 (February 1993).
Lyskowski, Kevin. "Environmental Justice: A Research Guide." Our Earth Matters, (Spring
1994).
MacLachlan, Claudia. "Tension Underlies Rapport With Grassroots Groups." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)3, (p)10 (September 1992).
MacLean, Alair. "Bigotry and Poison." Progressive, (v)57 (n)l, (p)14 (January 1993).
Mahaffey, Kathryn R. "National Estimates of Blood Lead Levels: United States, 1976-1980."
New England Journal of Medicine, (v)307 (pp)573-579 (1982).
Maitra, Priyatosh. "Malthus Revisited-Population, Poverty and Pollution." International Journal
of Social Economics, (v)8 (n)3, (pp)47-61 (1981).
Mak, H., et al. "Prevalence of Asthma and Health Service Utilization of Asthmatic Children
in an Inner City." Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, (v)70 (p)5 (1982).
Makhijani, Arjun. From Global Capitalism to Economic Justice: An Inquiry into the Elimination
of Systemic Poverty, Violence, and Environmental Destruction in the World Economy. New
York, NY: Apex Press, (1992).
Mandelker, D.R. Environment and Equity: A Regulatory Challenge. New York, NY: McGraw Hill,
(1981).
Mank, Bradford C. "Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation
and Equitable Compensation." Ohio State Law Journal, (v)56 (n)2, (p)329 (1995).
Mann, Eric. L. A. 's Lethal Air: New Strategies for Policy, Organizing, & Action. Los Angeles,
CA: A Labor/Community Strategy Book, (1991).
Manus, Peter M. "The Owl, the Indian, the Feminist, and the Brother: Environmentalism Encounters
the Social Justice Movements." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23
(n)2, (p)249 (Winter 1996).
Marella, Vincent J. "The Department of Justice Prosecutive Guidelines in Environmental Cases
Involving Voluntary Disclosure." The American Criminal Law Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)l 179
(1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 32
Martin, P. Field Duty, U.S. Farmworkers and Pesticide Safety. World Resources Institute Center
for Policy Research, #3, (1985).
Martin, P., R. Mines and A. Diaz. "A Profile of California Farmworkers." California Agriculture,
(v)6 (pp) 16-18 (1985).
Martinez, Elizabeth. "Defending the Earth in '92: A People's Challenge to the EPA." Social
Justice, (v)19 (n)2, (p)95 (Summer 1992).
. "When People of Color are an Endangered Species." ZMagazine, (v)4 (pp)61-64
(April 1991).
Mason, Deidre. "New Focus." Environmental Health, (v)103 (n)7, (p)149 (July 1995).
Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc., Massachusetts Environmental Justice Network
Training: Free Continuing Education for Pro Bono Environmental Advocacy. Boston, MA:
MCLE, (1995).
McCallum, M. Recreational and Subsistence Catch and Consumption of Seafood from Three Urban
Industrial Bays ofPuget Sound. Olympia, WA: Washington State Division of Health, (1985).
McCaull, Julian. "Discriminatory Air Pollution: If the Poor Don't Breathe." Environment,
(v)19 (pp)26-32 (March 1976).
McCoy, Charlie. "Scales of Justice: Saltwater Fisheries Law in Florida." Journal of Land
Use & Environmental Law, (v)5 (n)2, (p)613 (1990).
McDermott, J. Charles. "Balancing the Scales of Environmental Justice." The Fordham Urban
Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)689 (Spring 1994).
McWilliams, Douglas A. "Environmental Justice and Industrial Redevelopment: Economics and
Equality in Urban Revitalization." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)21 (n)3, (p)705 (1994).
Meeks, Patti A. "Justice Scalia and the Demise of Environmental Law Standing." Journal of
Land Use & Environmental Law, (v)8 (n)2, (p)343 (Spring 1993).
Merchant, Carolyn. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. New York, NY: Routledge,
(1992).
Metzger, Eleanor N. "Driving the Environmental Justice Movement Forward: The Need for a Paternalistic
Approach." Case Western Reserve Law Review, (v)45 (n)l, (p)379 (1994).
Meyer, Art. Earth Keepers: Environmental Perspectives on Hunger, Poverty, and Injustice.
Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press, (1991).
Meyer, Eugene L. "Environmental Racism: Why is it Always Dumped in Our Backyard? Minority
Groups Take a Stand." Audubon, (v)94 (n)l, (p)30 (January/February 1992).
"The Michigan Conference: A Turning Point." In EPA Journal. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul
Mohai (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 33
Minor, Jacqueline. "Environmental Cases in the European Court of Justice: 1991." Journal
of Environmental Law, (v)4 (n)l, (p) 159 (1992).
Mitchell, Carolyn M. "Environmental Racism: Race as a Primary Factor in the Selection of
Hazardous Waste Sites." National Black Law Journal, (v)12 (n)3, (pp) 176-188 (Winter 1993).
Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. "Race, Poverty and the Environment: The Disadvantaged Face
Greater Risks." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)6-8 (March/April 1992).
. "Environmental Racism: Reviewing the Evidence." Race and the Incidence of Environmental
Hazards: A Time for Discourse, (1992).
. "Race, Poverty, and the Environment." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)6-8 (1992).
Mohai, Paul. "Public Concern and Elite Involvement in Environmental Conservation Issues."
Social Science Quarterly, (v)66 (pp)820-838 (1985).
. "Black Environmentalist!!." Social Science Quarterly, (v)71 (n)4, (pp)744-765 (1990).
. "The Demographics of Dumping Revisited: Examining the Impact of Alternate Methodologies
in Environmental Justice Research." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)615
(1995).
Montgomery, L.E. and O. Carterpokras. "Health Status by Social Class and or Minority Status
- Implications for Environmental Equity Research." Toxicology and Industrial Health,
(v)9 (n)5, (pp)729-773 (1993).
Moreel, David. "Siting and the Politics of Equity." Hazardous Waste, (v)l (pp)55-59 (1980).
Morgan, Elizabeth S. Environmental Justice and the Robbins Incinerator. Thesis (M.A.)--University
of Illinois at Chicago, (1996).
Morrison, Denton E. and Riley E. Dunlap. "Environmentalism and Elitism: A Conceptual and
Empirical Analysis." Environmental Management, (v)10 (n)5, (pp)581-589 (1986).
Moses, M. "Pesticide-Related Health Problems and Farmworkers." AAOHN Journal, (v)37 (pp)l 15-130
(1989).
. "Environmental Equity and Pesticide Exposure." Toxicology and Industrial Health,
(v)9 (n)5, (pp)913-959 (1993).
Mossop, David. "Justice Statement: A Mixed Bag for Environmental Law." Environmental and
Planning Law Journal, (v)12 (n)4, (p)237 (August 1995).
Nadakavukaren, A. "People Living With Pollution." Greenpeace, (pp)8-13 (October/November/December
1991).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 34
Napton, M. and F. Day. "Polluted Neighborhoods in Texas, Who Lives There?" Environment and
Behavior, (v)24 (n)4, (pp)508-526 (1993).
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer Statistics Review: 1973-1986. Washington, DC: National
Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1989).
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Health of Black and White Americans, 1985-87,
Series 10: Data from the National Health Interview Survey, No. 171. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (January 1990).
National Conference of State Legislatures Environmental Justice Group, Environmental Justice:
A Matter of Perspective. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures, (1995).
National Council of Christ, "The Lumbee River, Lumbee Indians and GSX, Inc." The Egg: National
Journal of Eco-Justice, (pp) 10-11 (Winter 1987).
National Law Journal, "EPA Mulls Civil Rights Law at Hill Hearing." (March 1993).
. Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental Law, (v)15 (n)3, (1992).
Navarro, V. "Race or Class v. Race and Class: Mortality Differentials in the U.S." The Lancet,
(v)336 (pp) 1238-1240 (1989).
Nazaroff, W. and K. Teichman. "Indoor Radon." Environmental Science and Technology, (v)24
(pp)774-782 (1990).
Needleman, H.L. "The Future Challenge of Lead Toxicity." In Advances in Lead Research, Environmental
Health Perspectives. Eds. Lucier and Hook Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, (1990).
Neiman, Max and Ronald O. Loveridge. "Environmentalism and Local Growth Control: A Probe
into the Class Bias Thesis." Environment and Behavior, (v)13 (pp)759-772 (1981).
Nelson, A.C. "Price Effects of Landfills on Residential Land Values." Journal of Urban Planning
and Development, (v)118 (n)9, (pp) 128-137 (1981).
"New Movement Focuses on Minorities." The CQ Researcher, (v)6 (n)32, (p)752 (August 1996).
The New Resistance Southwestern Communities of Color Struggling for Environmental and Economic
Justice. New York, NY: Deep Dish TV, (1992).
Newman, Penny. "A Multi-issue, Multi-ethnic Women's Environmental Justice Movement is Sweeping
the Globe with a Mandate for Change." The Workbook, (v)19 (n)2, (p)93 (Summer 1994).
. "The Grassroots Movement for Environmental Justice: Fighting for Our Lives."
New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, (v)3 (n)4,
(p)87 (Summer 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 35
Newton, David E. Environmental Justice: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO,
(1996).
Nicholson, Mairbel N. and Ralph A. DeMeo. "Air of Equality: An Analysis of Florida's Environmental
Equity and Justice Act." The Florida Bar Journal, (v)68 (n)9, (p) 112 (October 1994).
Nieves, L.A. and D.R. Wernette. "Minorities and Air Pollution: A Prelimary Geo-Demographic
Analysis." Socioeconomic Research Conference II, (pp)27-28 (June 1991).
. "Breathing Polluted Air: Minorities are Disproportionately Exposed." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp) 16-17 (March/April 1992).
Nikitas, Margo. "The Silent Bomb: Racism, War, and Toxic Waste." Peoples Weekly World, (v)5
(p)13 (March 1991).
Nixon, Ron. "Environmental Justice." Black Issues in Higher Education, (v)12 (n)25, (p)27 1
(February 1996).
No, Anne K. "Environmental Justice: Concentration on Education and Public Participation as
an Alternative Solution to Legislation." William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy
Review, (v)20 (n)3, (p)373 (Summer 1996).
Noe, Francis P. and Rob Snow. "Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern." Journal
of Environmental Education, (v)21 (n)2, (pp)27-34 (1989).
Nordquist, Joan. Environmental Racism and the Environmental Justice Movement: A Bibliography.
Santa Cruz, CA: Reference and Research Services, (1995).
Norris, R. Pills, Pesticides and Profits: International Trade in Toxic Substances. New York,
NY: North River Press, (1982).
"Not in My Backyard: IR&R [Individual Rights and Responsibilities Section] Joins in Quest
for Environmental Justice: ABA [American Bar Association] House Passes Resolution."
Human Rights, (v)20 (n)4, (p)26 (Fall 1993).
Novotny, Patrick John. "Where We Live, Work and Play: Reframing the Cultural Landscape of
Environmental ism in the Environmental Justice Movement." New Political Science, (v)32
(p)61 (Summer 1995).
. "Organizing for Community Health." The Workbook, (v)19 (n)4, (p)148 (Winter 1994).
. Framing and Political Movements: A Study of Four Cases from the Environmental
Justice Movement. Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of Wisconsin-Madison, (1995).
O'Looney, John. "Framing a Social Market for Community Responsibility: Governing in an Age
of NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard] and LULUs [Locally Unwanted Land Use]." National Civic
Review, (v)82 (n)l, (p)44 (Winter 1993).
O'Neal, John. "Junebug Environmental Justice Festival." TDR, (v)38 (n)2, (p) 12 (Summer 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 36
Oberly, Jim. "Spearing Fish, Playing 'Chicken': Race and Class Warfare Over Fishing Rights
in Wisconsin." Nation, (v)248 (pp)844-846 (June 1989).
Okie, S. "Study Links Cancer, Poverty." The Washington Post, 17 April 1991.
Olson, Paul A. The Struggle for the Land: Indigenous Insight and Industrial Empire in the
Semiarid World. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, (1990).
Opheim, Teresa. "Profile: Larry Wallace." The Environmental Forum, (v)ll (n)4, (p)28 (July
1994).
Opotow, Susan and Susan Clayton. "Green Justice: Conceptions of Fairness and the Natural
World." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (p)l (Fall 1994).
Opotow, Susan. "Predicting Protection: Scope of Justice and the Natural World." Journal
of Social Issues, (v)50 (p)49 (Fall 1994).
Orr, L.L. Income, Employment, and Urban Residential Location. New York, NY: Academic Press,
(1975).
Ostheimer, John M. and Leonard G. Ritt. "Environment, Energy, and Black Americans." Sage
Research Papers in the Social Sciences (Human Ecology Subseries, No. 90-025), (p)38 (1976).
Otway, H. and B. Wynne. "Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox." Risk Analysis, (v)9
(n)2, (pp)141-145 (1989).
Pardo, Mary. "Creating Community: Mexican American Women in Eastside Los Angeles." A Journal
ofChicano Studies, (v)2022 (n)l-2, (p)39 (Spring-Fall 1991).
Payne, Karen W. and Carlos A. Ugarte. "Office of Minority Health Resource Center: Impact
on Health Related Disparity Among Minority Populations." Health Education, (v)9 (n)2,
(p)608 (1989).
Peace, Environmental, and Social Justice Group Directory. Ithaca, NY: Centerpeace, Center
for Religion, Ethics and Social Policy, (1990).
Pease, W. and R. Morello-Frosch. The Distribution of Air Toxics Emissions in the San Francisco
Bay Area: A Preliminary Environmental Justice Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Berkeley, School of Public Health, Environmental Health Program, (1995).
Penz, G. Peter. "Colonization of Tribal Lands in Indonesia: State Rationales, Rights to Land
and Environmental Justice." Social Action, (v)42 (n)2, (p)139 (April 1992).
"People of Color Summit Condemns 'Environmental Racism'." National Catholic Reporter, (p)5
(November 1991).
Perez, Nelson. "The Unconstitutionality of Waste Flow Control and the Environmental Justice
Movement's Impact on Incinerators." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, (v)22
(n)2, (p)587 (1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 37
Perfecto, Ivette and Velsquez Baldemar. "Farmworkers: Among the Least Protected." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (n)l, (pp) 13-14 (1992).
Perfecto, Ivette. "Pesticide Exposure of Farm Workers and the International Connection."
In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai
(1990).
. "Hazardous Waste and Pesticides: An International Tragedy." In Environmental
Racism: Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Perkins, Jane. "Recognizing and Attacking Environmental Racism." Clearinghouse Review, (v)26
(n)4, (pp)389-397 (1992).
Perlin, Susan A., R. Woodrow Setzer and Ken Sexton. "Distribution of Industrial Air Emissions
by Income and Race in the United States: An Approach Using the Toxic Release Inventory."
Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)l, (p)69 (January 1995).
Perrin, Constance. Everything in its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press, (1992).
Perrolle, Judith A. "Comments for the Special Issue Editor: The Emerging Dialogue on Environmental
Justice." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (p)l (February 1993).
Petrikin, Jonathan S. Environmental Justice. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, (1995).
Picard, Daniel C. '"Fish Consumption' and National Water Quality Criteria." Water Quality
Standards for the 21 st Century, (September 1992).
Pickle, L.W., ed. Atlas of the U.S., Cancer Mortality Among Nonwhites: 1950-1980, Table 2.
Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National
Institutes of Health, (1990).
"A Place at the Table: The Mainstream Environmental Movement has Rarely Looked Beyond its
Own White Nose." Sierra, (v)78 (n)3, (p)50 (May 1993).
Poirier, M. "Environmental Justice/Racism/Equity: Can We Talk?" West Virginia Law Review,
(v)96 (n)4, (p)1082 (1995).
Poirier, Marc R. "Environmental Justice and the Beach Access Movements of the 1970s in Connecticut
and New Jersey." Connecticut Law Review, (v)28 (n)3, (p)719 (Spring 1996).
"The Politics of Pollution: Implications for the Black Community." Phylon, (v)41 (n)l, (pp)71-78
(1986).
Pollock, Philip H. and Elliot M. Vittas. "Who Bears the Burdens of Environmental Pollution?
Race, Ethnicity, and Environmental Equity in Florida." Social Science Quarterly, (v)76
(p)294 (June 1995).
Pollock, S. and J. Grozuczak. Reagan, Toxics, and Minorities. Washington, DC: Urban Environment
Conference, Inc., (1984).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 38
Popovic, Neil A.F. "Pursuing Environmental Justice with International Human Rights and State
Constitutions." Stanford Environmental Law Journal, (v)15 (n)2, (p)338 (1996).
Portney, Kent E. "Environmental Justice and Sustainability: Is There a Critical Nexus in
the Case of Waste Disposal or Treatment." The Fordham Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3,
(p)827 (Spring 1994).
. Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities: The Nimby [Not In My Back Yard]
Syndrome. New York, NY: Auburn House, (1991).
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), "...And Justice for All" the Movement for Environmental Justice.
Louisville, KY: Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), (1996).
Proceedings of the 1990 National Minority Health Conference: Focus on Environmental Contamination.
Princeton, NJ: Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., (1990).
Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards.
Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, (1990).
Prout, Linda R. "The Toxic Avengers." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)48-49 (1992).
Puckett, Jim. "Disposing of the Waste-Trade: Closing the Recycling Loophole." The Ecologist,
(v)24 (n)2, (March/April 1994).
Puffer, H. Consumption Rates of Potentially Hazardous Marine Fish Caught in the Metropolitan
Los Angeles Area. (1981).
Pugliese III, Sebastian C. "Environmental Justice: Lower Barriers to Participation." Wisconsin
Law Review, (v)5 (p) 1177 (1995).
"The Quest for Environmental Equity: Mobilizing African-American Community for Social Change."
Society and Natural Resources, (v)3 (pp)301-311 (October/December 1990).
Raff, Murray. "The Renewed Prominence of Environmental Impact Assessment: A Tale of Two Cities."
Environmental and Planning Law Journal, (v)12 (n)4, (p)241 (August 1995).
Rajagopal, R. Environmental Justice. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, (1995).
Ramirez, Odessa. "The Loss of Native Lands and Economic Black-Mail." Social Justice, (v)19
(n)2, (pp)78-86 (Summer 1992).
Ratcliffe, K.L. "Fusing Civil, Environmental Rights: Hispanic Residents Claim Racism in Protest
Over Plan to Build Incinerator in Their Fertile Valley." Christian Science Monitor, (p)12
(May 1991).
Rauber, Paul. "Unsung Allies: The Greenest Group in Congress is Black." Sierra, (v)79 (n)5,
(p)37 (1994).
Reath, Viki. "EPA to Use Civil Rights Act in Siting Decision." Environment Week, (v)6 (n)36,
(p)l (October 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 39
. "EPA, Commission Investigating Civil Rights Allegations." Environment Week, (v)6
(n)40, (p)l (October 1993).
. "EPA to Probe Texas Environmental Justice Complaint." Environment Week, (v)7
(n)14, (p)l (April 1994).
Rees, J. "Equity and Environmental Policy." Geography, (v)76 (pp)292-303 (1991).
Rees, Matthew. "Black and Green: Race and Environmentalism." The New Republic, (v)206 (n)9,
(pp) 15-16 (March 1992).
Regan, Richard. Environmental Racism: An Annotated Bibliography. Washington, DC: Center
for Policy Alternatives, (1993).
Reich, Peter L. "Greening the Ghetto: A Theory of Environmental Race Discrimination." The
University of Kansas Law Review, (v)41 (n)2, (pp)271-314 (Winter 1992).
Reilly, William K. "EPA's Reilly Replies to 'Unequal Protection'." The National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)21, (p)16 (1993).
Residential Apartheid: The American Legacy. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Afro-American
Studies Publications, (1994).
Resolondraibe, Peri. "Environmental Concern and Economic Justice." World & World, (v)ll (n)2,
(p)147 (Spring 1991).
Robinson, W.P. "Uranium Production and its Effects on Navajo Communities Along the Rio Puerco
in Western New Mexico." In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds.
Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1990).
Rodgers, John Herrick. Collaborating Across Many Divides: Environmental Justice Groups and
the Mainstream Nationals. Thesis (M.A.)—University of California, Santa Barbara, (1995).
"Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring Environmental Justice." Risk Analysis, (v)16 (n)4,
(pp)517-526 (August 1996).
Rolednak, A.P. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Disease. London: Oxford UP, (1989).
Roman, . '"Environmental Racism' Rankles." The Washington Times, 25 June 1992, (p)Al.
Rosen, Sanford Jay. "Seeking Environmental Justice for Minorities and Poor People." Trial,
(v)30 (n)12, (p)50 (1994).
Ross, Heather E. "Using NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] in the Fight for Environmental
Justice." William and Mary Journal of Environmental Law, (v)18 (n)2, (p)353 (Spring 1994).
Ruben, Barbara and Joseph Smith. "Jaundiced Justice: The Nation's Largest Waste Company Claims
It Wants to Help Facilitate a Dialogue on Environmental Justice, But Grassroots Activists
Question Its Motives." Environmental Action Magazine, (v)26 (p)31 (Fall 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 40
Ruben, Barbara. "Grave Reservations: Waste Company Proposals Targeting Native American Lands
are Meeting with a Growing Pattern of Resistance." Environmental Action, (v)23 (n)l,
(pp)12-15 (1991).
Ruffins, Paul. "Mixing a Few More Colors into the Green." In Context, (v)25 (p)33 (1990).
. "Environmental Commitment as if People Didn't Matter." In Environmental Racism:
Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Russell, Dick. "Environmental Racism: Minority Communities and Their Battle Against Toxics."
Amicus Journal, (v)ll (pp)22-32 (Spring 1989).
Sachs, Aaron. "Upholding Human Rights and Environmental Justice." The Humanist, (v)56 (n)2,
(p)5 (March 1996).
. Eco-Justice: Linking Human Rights and the Environment, Worldwatch Paper No. 127.
Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, (1995).
. "Upholding Human Rights and Environmental Justice." In State of the World. Ed.
L.R. Brown Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, (1996).
Salazar, Debra J. Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activists Push the Frontiers of Forestry
and Politics. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, (1996).
Sandman, P.M. "Getting to Maybe: Some Communication Aspects of Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities."
Seton Hall Legislative Journal, (v)9 (pp)437-465 (1985).
. "Poisoning the Border." U.S. News and World Report, (p)37 (May 1992).
Sands, Philippe. "European Community Environmental Law: Legislation, the European Court of
Justice and Common-Interest Groups." The Modern Law Review, (v)53 (n)5, (p)685 (September
1990).
Sarangi, Satinath. "Bhopal Disaster: Judiciary's Failure - Satinath Sarangi." Economic and
Political Weekly, (v)30 (n)46, (p)2907 (November 1995).
Sarokin, David J. Environmental Justice: Co-Evolution of Environmental Concerns and Social
Justice. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, (1994).
. "Environmental Justice: Co-Evolution of Environmental Concerns and Social Justice."
Environmentalist, (v)14(n)2, (p) 121 (1994).
Satchell, Michael. "A Whiff of Discrimination? Racism and Environmental Policy." U.S. News
& World Report, (v)112 (n)17, (p)34 (May 1992).
Savage, E.P. National Study to Determine Levels of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides in
Human Milk. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, (1976).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 41
Savage, J.A. and Steve Stallone. "Breathing Fire: White Middle-Class Richmond Residents are
Finally Joining Poor Blacks and Latinos in Their Decades-Old Battle Against Chevron's
Pollution." San Francisco Bay Guardian (East Bay ed.), (v)26 (n)23, (1992).
Schaffer, Gwen. "Asian Americans Organize for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)25 (n)4,
(p)30 (Winter 1994).
Schemmel, Mathew L. and Bas de Regt. "The European Court of Justice and the Environmental
Protection Policy of the European Community." Boston College International and Comparative
Law, (v)17 (n)l, (p)53 (Winter 1994).
Schleifstein, . "Minister Focuses on Ecology." New Orleans Times Picayne, 27 March 1992,
(p)B8.
Schlossberg, M. Evaluating Environmental Inequity Using GIS and 1990 US Census Data: A Study
of Silicon Valley. San Jose, CA: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, San Jose
State University, (1995).
Schneider, Keith. "A Valley of Death for the Navajo Uranium Miners." New York Times, 3 May
1992.
. "Minorities Join to Fight Polluting of Neighborhoods." New York Times, 25 October
1991.
Schneider, Paul. "Respect for the Earth: The Environmentalism of Chief Oren Lyons Stems From
His Iroquois Heritage." Audubon, (v)96 (n)2, (p) 110 (March-April 1994).
Schueler, Donald G. "Southern Exposure." Sierra, (pp)42-49 (November/December 1992).
Schwab, Jim. Deeper Shades of Green: The Rise of Blue-Collar and Minority Environmentalism
in America. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Press, (1994).
Schwartz, Adam D. "The Law of Environmental Justice: A Research Pathfinder." Environmental
Law Reporter, (v)25 (n)10, (p) 10543 (1995).
. "Environmental Justice: A Survey of the Ailments of Environmental Racism." Howard
Scroll: The Social Justice Review, (v)2 (n)2, (p)35 (Summer 1994).
Schwartz, J. "Predictors of Asthma and Persistent Wheeze in a National Sample of Children
in the United States." American Review of Respiratory Disease, (p) 142 (1990).
Schwarzman, Mat. "Drawing the Line at Place: The Environmental Justice Project." High Performance,
(v)19 (n)2, (p)8 (Summer 1996).
Scott, William C. "Environmental Justice: A New Era of Community Empowerment, Political Activism,
and Civil Rights Litigation." Environmental Claims Journal, (v)7 (n)l, (p)5 (1994).
Seckinger, Cristina. "Evaluating the Real Environmental Health and Social Justice Status of
Your Community." Family and Community Health, (v)17 (n)2, (p)64 (July 1994).
"Seeking 'Environmental Justice'." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, (v)51 (n)34, (p)2257
(August 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 42
Seidman, Ethan. "What Color is Green?" Garbage, (v)4 (n)4, (p)14 (1992).
Seigler, Jane. "Environmental Justice: An Industry Perspective." Maryland Journal of Contemporary
Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)59 (1993).
Selcraig, Bruce. "Border Patrol." Sierra, (v)79 (n)3, (p)58 (May-June 1994).
Seley, J.E. and J. Wolpert. "Equity and Location." In Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste
Management. Eds. Oelgeschlager and Gunn and Hain (1983).
"Setting Environmental Justice in Space and Place: Acute and Chronic Airborne Toxic Releases
in the Southeastern United States." Urban Geography, (v)17 (n)5, (p)380 (July 1996).
Settles, Trish, Jason Webb and Antonio Alves. "Environmental Justice Law and the Challenges
Facing Urban Communities." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)735 (Summer
1995).
Sevrens, Gail. Environmental, Health, and Housing Needs and Non-Profit Groups in the U.S.
-Mexico Border Area. Arlington, VA: World Environment Center, (June 1992).
Sexton, Ken and Yolanda Banks Anderson. "Equity in Environmental Health: Research Issues
and Needs." Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (September-October 1993).
Sexton, Ken, Kenneth Ilden and B.L. Johnson. "Environmental Justice: The Central Role of
Research in Establishing a Credible Scientific Foundation." Toxicology and Industrial
Health, (v)9 (n)5, (p)685 (1993).
Sexton, Ken. "Environmental Justice: Are Pollution Risks Higher for Disadvantaged Communities?"
Health Environmental Digest, (v)9 (n)9, (p)73 (1996).
Shaffer, Gwen. "Asian Americans Organize for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)25 (n)4,
(p)30 (Winter 1994).
Shaikh, R.A., ed. Variations in Susceptibility to Inhaled Pollutants. Baltimore, MD: John
Hopkins University Press, (1988).
Shelton, B.A. Growth and Decline of Sunbelt Boomtown. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University
Press,.
Sheridan, Patrick. "Minorities, Low-Income Groups Most at Risk." Waste Technical News, (August
1992).
Shields, G. "Implementing the Executive Order of Environmental Justice at the U.S. Department
of Energy." National Association of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and
Exposition: Environmental Challenges-The Next Twenty Years (20th), (June 1995).
Shutkin, William A. "The Concept of Environmental Justice and a Reconception of Democracy."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)579 (Summer 1995).
Shutkin, William A. and Charles P. Lord. "Environmental Law, Environmental Justice, and Democracy."
West Virginia Law Review, (v)96 (pp) 117-1132 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 43
Sidawi, Steve. "The Historical Roots of Environmental Inequalities in a Planned Industrial
Suburb." Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago, Illinois,
(1995).
Siemens, Reynold. "Environmental Justice: The New Wave." Virginia Environmental Law Journal,
(v)14 (n)4, (p)567 (Summer 1995).
Sierra Roundtable on Race, Justice, and the Environment, "A Place at the Table." Sierra, (pp)51-58,-90-91
(May/June 1993).
Silver, K. "Minorities and Toxics." Exposure, (pp)36-37 (January/February 1984).
Singer, Brent. "An Extension of Rawls' Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics." Environmental
Ethics, (v)10 (n)3, (p)217 (Fall 1988).
Situ, Yingyi and David Emmons. "Teaching Environmental Crime in a Criminal Justice Curriculum."
Journal of Criminal Justice Education: JCJE, (v)7 (n)l, (p)147 (Spring 1996).
Slavin, J.P. "Environmental Nightmare Turns Haitian City Into Toxic Dust Bowl." National
Catholic Reporter, (v)27 (p)12 (September 1991).
Sly, Peter W. "EPA and Indian Reservations." Environmental Law Reporter, (v)20 (pp)10429-10437
(October 1990).
Small, Gail. "War Stories: Environmental Justice in Indian Country." The Amicus Journal,
(v)16 (n)l, (p)38 (Spring 1994).
Smith, Beverly McQueary. "Ethics, The Legacy of the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
and the Movement Toward Environmental Justice." Environmental Law Journal, (v)l (n)l,
(p)l (Fall 1994).
Snow, Donald. Inside the Environment Movement: Meeting the Leadership Challenge. Washington,
DC: Island Press, (1992).
Snow, Katrin. "Tribes' Activism Poses Hazard to Waste Industry's Health." National Catholic
Reporter, (v)28 (pp)13-14 (December 1991).
The Social Burdens of Environmental Pollution: A Comparative Metropolitan Data Source. Cambridge,
MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., (1977).
"Society." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)l, (p)22A (January 1995).
"Society." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)7, (p)309A (July 1995).
Solnit, Rebecca. Savage Dreams: A Journey into the Hidden Wars of the American West. San
Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, (1994).
Somsen, Hans. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)4 (n)8, (p)244 (August 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 44
. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)5 (n)3, (p)93 (March 1996).
. "European Court of Justice: Case Reports." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)5 (n)7, (p)215 (July 1996).
. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)4 (n)10, (p)276 (October 1995).
Southwest Organizing Project, Intel Inside New Mexico: A Case Study of Environmental and Economic
Injustice. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Organizing Project, (1995).
. Intel Inside...New Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Organizing Project, (1983).
Southwest Research and Information Center, The Workbook. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Research
and Information Center, (1991).
Spears, Ellen. "Freedom Buses Roll Along Cancer Alley." Southern Changes, (v)15 (n)l, (Spring
1993).
"Special Issue on Environmental Justice." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (February 1993).
"Special Issue. Latinos and the Environment." Race, Poverty & the Environment, (v)4 (n)3,
(Fall 1994).
Spillmann, Andreas. "Social Justice and Environmental Policy." International Journal of Social
Economics, (v)22 (n)3, (p)3 (1995).
Sprokkereef, Annemarie. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental
Law Review, (v)5 (n)l, (p)23 (January 1996).
Stafford, H.A. "Environmental Protection and Industrial Location." Annals of the Association
of American Geographers, (v)75 (n)2, (pp)227-240 (1985).
Starkey, Deb. "Environmental Justice Win, Lose or Draw." State Legislatures, (v)20 (n)3,
(p)27 (March 1994).
Starr, Judson W. "Turbulent Times at Justice and EPA: The Origins of Environmental Criminal
Prosecutions and the Work that Remains." The George Washington Law Review, (v)59 (n)4,
(p)900 (April 1991).
The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance. Boston, MA: South End
Press, (1992).
Stein, Eleanor. "Environmental Section Forms a New Committee on Environmental Justice." New
York State Bar Journal, (v)66 (n)2, (p)34 (February 1994).
Steinberg, Michael W. and Tim A. Pohle. "Environmental Justice and RCRA [Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act] Pemits: Nothing Is Quite What It Seems." Environment Reporter, (v)26
(n)22, (p)1025 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 45
Steinhart, Peter. "What Can We Do About Environmental Racism? Coping With Tendency to Build
Freeways, Prisons and Waste Facilities in Poor and Minority Communities." Audubon, (v)93
(n)3, (p)18 (May 1991).
Stonich, Susan C. "The Environmental Quality and Social Justice Implications of Shrimp Mariculture
Development in Honduras." Human Ecology, (v)23 (n)2, (p)143 (June 1995).
"Strategic Elements for Environmental Justice." Environmental Health Perspectives: ehp, (v)103
(n)9, (p)796 (September 1995).
Strategic Plan for the Elimiantion of Childhood Lead Poisoning. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease
Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1991).
Straw, Lawrence J., Jr. and Straw & Gilmartin. "Environmental Justice: Racial Gerrymandering
for Environmental Siting Decisions." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4,
(p)665 (1995).
Street, Richard. "Battling Toxic Racism: El Pueblo Para El Aire y Agua Limpio." Organizing
for Our Lives: New Voices from Rural Communities, (1992).
Streeter, Calvin L. and Jacqueline Gonsalvez. "Social Justice Issues and the Environmental
Movement in America: A New Challenge for Social Workers." The Journal of Applied Social
Sciences, (v)18 (n)2, (p)209 (Spring 1994).
Suagee, Dean B. "Turtle's War Party: An Indian Allegory on Environmental Justice." Journal
of Environmental Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)461 (1994).
Suro, Roberto. "Pollution-Weary Minorities Try Civil Rights Tack." New York Times, (p)Al
(January 1993).
Swanson, Sandra. "Can We Balance the Scales of Environmental Justice?" Safety & Health:
SH, (v)152 (n)4, (p)76 (October 1995).
Swanston, Samara F. "An Environmental Justice Perspective on Superfund Reathorization." St.
John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)565 (1994).
Szasz, Andrew. EcoPopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis,
MN: University of Minnesota Press, (1994).
. "Demographics of Proximity to Toxic Pollution: The Case of Los Angeles County."
(1993).
Taibi, Anthony D. "Environmental Justice, Structural Economic Theory, and Community Economic
Empowerment." St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)491 (1994).
Taliman, Valerie. "Saving Native Lands: One Woman's Crusade Against Environmental Racism."
Ms. Magazine, (v)4 (n)4. (p)28 (January/February 1994).
. "The Toxic Waste of Indian Lives." Covert Action, (v)40 (pp)16-19 (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 46
. "Toxic Waste Dumping in the Third World." Race and Class, (v)30 (n)3, (pp)47-56
(1989).
. "Stuck Holding the Nation's Nuclear Waste." Race, Poverty & the Environment,
(p)6 (Fall 1992).
Tarshis, Lauren. "Dumping on Minorities." Scholastic Update, (p) 16 (April 1992).
Taylor, Dorceta E. "Blacks and the Environment: Towards an Explanation of the Concern and
Action Gap Between Blacks and Whites." Environment and Behavior, (v)21 (n)2, (pp)175-205
(1989).
. "The Environmental Justice Movement." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (p)23 (January
1992).
Tesh, Sylvia N. and Bruce A. Williams. "Identity Politics, Disinterested Politics, and Environmental
Justice." Polity, (v)28 (n)3, (p)285 (Spring 1996).
Texas Environmental Equity and Justice Task Force, Recommendations of the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission. Austin, TX: Texas Network for Environmental Equity and Justice
Task Force, (August 1993).
Texas Network for Environmental and Economic Justice, Toxics in Texas & Their Impact on Communities
of Color. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Policy Studies, (March 1993).
The Environmental Law Institute, The Environmental Lawyer/The Environmental Justice. Washington,
DC: The Institute, (1993).
The National Law Journal, "Special Issue on Environmental Equity." The National Law Journal,
(September 1992).
Thigpen, David. "The Playground That Became a Battleground. (Kingsley Park Playground of
Buffalo, New York's Arsenic Contaminated Soil)." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)2, (p)14
(February/March 1993).
. "Peggy Shepard: Environmental Justice for All." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)6,
(p)44 (1993).
Thomas, John K. and Frank M. Howell. "Environmental Justice: Empirical Evidence and Conceptual
Prospects." Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association in Dallas, TX,
(March 1995).
"To Forge a Movement." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)30 (Winter 1993).
Tolba, Mostafa Kamal. "Global Environmental Justice." The International Journal of Humanities
and Peace, (v)9 (n)l, (p)78 (Spring 1992).
. Global Environmental Justice. Nairobi: Information and Public Affairs, UNEP,
(1990).
Tomsho, Robert. "Dumping Grounds: Indian Tribes Contend With Some of Worst of American's
Pollution." Wall Street Journal, 29 November 1990.
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 47
Torres, Gerald. "Keynote Address: Changing the Way Government Views Environmental Justice."
St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)543 (1994).
. "Environmental Burdens and Democratic Justice." The Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)431 (Spring 1994).
. "Environmental Justice: The Legal Meaning of a Social Movement." The Journal
of Law and Commerce, (v)15 (n)2, (p)597 (Spring 1996).
. "Class, Race and Environmental Regulation, Introduction: Understanding Environmental
Racism." University of Colorado Law Review, (v)63 (n)4, (p)839.
Toxic Struggles: The Theory and Practice of Environmental Justice. Philadelphia, PA: New
Society Publishers, (1993).
"Toxic Struggles." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)22 (Winter 1993).
"Toxic Waste and the African American Community." Urban League Review, (v)13 (pp)67-75 (Summer/Winter
1989).
Transportation, Environmental Justice, and Social Equity. Conference Proceedings. Held in
Chicago, Illinois on November 16-18. (July 1995).
Trask, M. "Native Hawaiian Historical and Cultural Perspectives on Environmenal Justice."
Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)3 (n)2, (1992).
Truax, Hawley. "Beyond White Environmental ism: Minorities and the Environment." Environmental
Action, (v)21 (pp)9-30 (1990).
. "Untold Suffering." Environmental Action, (v)24 (n)3, (pp)14-17 (1992).
. "Environmental Justice for All." Environmental Action, (pp)5-6 (November/December
1991).
Tsao, Naikang. "Ameliorating Environmental Racism: A Citizens' Guide to Combatting the Discriminatory
Siting of Toxic Waste Dumps." New York University Law Review, (v)67 (n)2, (pp)366-418
(May 1992).
Tyson, Rae. "Target of Toxins? Poor Communities Charge 'Environmental Racism'." USA Today,
24 October 1991.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Louisiana Advisory Committee, The Battle for Environmental
Justice in Louisiana: Government, Industry, and the People. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana
Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, (1993).
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Civil
and Constitutional Rights, Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, (1994).
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives, Environmental Issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 48
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Environmental Justice: Proposed Implementation Strategy.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Defense, Proposed Strategy for Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (January 1995).
U.S. Department of Energy, Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign
Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel: Appendix A. (March 1995).
. U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Environmental Justice Strategy: Executive
Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, (1994).
U.S. Department of Energy. Idaho Operations Office, Final Environmental Impact Statement:
Volume 1, Appendix L, Environmental Justice. (April 1995).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Healthy People 2000, National Health Promotion
and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, (1990).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Elements for Environmental Justice.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (January 1995).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Achieving Environmental Justice: A Draft
Departmental Strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Justice Guidance Concerning Environmental Justice.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Justice. Environment and National Resources Division, Environmental Justice:
A Bibliography. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Management Division, (1995).
U.S. Department of the Interior, Department of the Interior Strategic Plan: Environmental
Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Justice In the Matter of the
Fifth Meeting of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council." The Administrative
Law Journal of the American University, (v)9 (n)3, (p)623 (Fall 1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Tribes at Risk: Wisconsin Tribes Comparative Risk Project.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (October 1992).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, OSWER Environmental
Justice Task Force Draft Final Report: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (April 1994).
. "Environmental Protection: Has It Been Fair?" EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (March/April
1992).
. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (September 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 49
. Air Pollution and Health Risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1991).
. EPA's Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1990).
. Methodology for Estimating Population Exposure from the Consumption of Chemically
Contaminated Fish. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. EPA's Environmental Justice Strategy: Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (April 1995).
. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1987).
. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(February 1994).
. Air Pollution and the Public: A Risk Communication Guide for State and Local
Agencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risk For All Communities. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (1992).
. Symposium on Health Research and Needs to Ensure Environmental Justice: Recommendations.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1994).
. EPA Journal. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,.
. Toxics in the Community: National and Local Perspectives. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Task Force Draft Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (April 1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Administration and Resources Management, Environmental
Justice: 1994 Annual Report: Focusing on Environmental Protection for All People. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
. Environmental Justice Initiatives 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (February 1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS),
Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Nitrogen Oxides: Assessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1982).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides: Assessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1982).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 50
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide: Reassessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1984).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Assessment of
Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1988).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter:
Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (1982).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Integration
of Environmental Justice into OSWER Policy, Guidance, and Regulatory Development. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (September 1994).
. Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report. Executive Summary.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (May 1995).
. Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (May 1995).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. Factsheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (1995).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (May 1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Environmental Equity, Environmental Justice
Initiatives 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Environmental Justice, Environmental Justice
Strategy: Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Environmental
Equity: Reducing Risk for All Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1992).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Toxic Release
Inventory & Emission Reductions 1987-1990 in the Lower Mississippi River Industrial Corridor.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1993).
U.S. Federal Transit Administration. Office of Policy Development, Transportation—Environmental
Justice and Social Equity Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, (1995).
U.S. General Accounting Office, Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with
Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. General
Accounting Office, (1983).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 51
. Hazardous and Nonhazardous Waste: Demographics of People Living Near Waste Facilities.
Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, (1995).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Draft Strategic Plan: Environmental
Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice Response to the Proposed EPA Worker Protection
Standards for Agricultural Workers, (1988).
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, Proceedings: The First National People
of Color Environmental Leadership Summit. New York, NY: Commission for Racial Justice,
(1992).
United Church of Christ. Commission for Racial Justice, Toxic Wastes and Race in the United
States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristics of Communities
with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York, NY: Public Data Access. Inc., (1987).
University of Colorado Law Review, Natural Resource Issue: Race, Class and Environmental Regulation,
(1992).
Urban Environmental Conference, Inc., Taking Back Our Health, An Institute on Surviving the
Toxics Threat to Minority' Communities. (1985).
"Using the National Environmental Policy Act to Address Environmental Justice Issues." Clearinghouse
Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)436 (1995).
Valdivia, Enrique. "How Legal Services Clients Become Neighborhood Activists: Three Tales
of Texas Environmental Justice." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)418 (1995).
Valencia-Ospina, E. "The International Court of Justice and International Environmental Law."
Asian Yearbook of International Law, (v)2 (p)l (1992).
Vallette, J. The International Trade in Wastes: A Greenpeace Inventory. Washington, DC:
Greenpeace, (1989).
Vasquez, Xc. "The North American Free Trade Agreement and Environmental Racism." Harvard
International Law Journal, (v)34 (pp)357-379 (Spring 1993).
Vaughan, Elaine and Brenda Nordenstam. "The Perception of Environmental Risks Among Ethnically
Diverse Groups." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, (v)22 (n)l, (pp)29-60 (1991).
Villarosa, Linda. "Showdown at Sunrise." Essence, (pp)55-59 (July 1991).
Wagener, DK. "Equity in Environmental Health - Data Collection and Interpretation Issues."
Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (pp)775-795 (1994).
Waldman, Steven. "Lead and Your Kids." Newsweek, (pp)42-48 (July 1991).
Ward, Bud. "Environmental Racism Becomes Key Clinton EPA Focus." Safety & Health, (v)149
(n)3, (p) 183 (March 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 52
Wardzinski, Karen M. "Environmental Justice: What Does It Mean for the NPDES [National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System] Permit Program?" Environmental Regulation and Permitting,
(v)5 (n)2, (p)93 (Winter 1995).
Warrior, . "Dancing With Wastes." Christianity and Crisis, (v)51 (pp)216-218 (July 1991).
Washington Toxics Coalition, "Toxic Waste and Race." Alternatives, (v)9 (n)2, (p)5 (1990).
Wassertrom, R.F. and R. Wiles. Field Duty: U.S. Farm Workers and Pesticide Safety. Washington,
DC: World Resources Institute, (1985).
Waxman, Henry A. The Real Story Behind EPA's Environmental Equity Report: An Evaluation of
Internal EPA Memoranda. (1992).
. "Lead Poisoning a Threat to the Health of Our Kids." USA Today, 30 July 1991,
(p)9A.
Weaver, Jace. Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice.
Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, (1996).
Webster, Donovan. "Sweet Home Arkansas." Utne Reader, (v)52 (pp) 112-116 (July/August 1992).
Weinberg, B. "Toxic Racism Dumps on Low-Income Communities." Guardian, (v)43 (p)7,9 (August
1991).
Weinberg, Philip. "Environmental Protection in the Next Decades: 'Moving From Clean Up to
Prevention." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, (v)27 (n)3, (p) 1145 (April 1994).
Weintraub, Bernard A. "Environmental Security, Environmental Management, and Environmental
Justice." Pace Environmental Law Review, (v)12 (n)2, (p)533 (Spring 1995).
Weisskopf, Michael. "Minorities Pollution Risk is Debated: Some Activists Link Exposure to
Racism." Washington Post, (p)A25 (January 1992).
. "Strategy on Lead Turns Out Not to be Blitzkrieg." The Washington Post, 25 October
1991, (p)A25.
. "EPA's Two Voices on Pollution Risks to Minorities." The Washington Post, 9 March
1992, (p)A15.
Wells, Malcolm. "A Jigsaw Puzzle: Racism, Environmentalism and the Social Conscience of an
Architect." Whole Earth Review, (v)62 (pp)22-25 (Spring 1989).
Wenz, Peter S. Environmental Justice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, (1988).
Wernette, D. Minorities, Age Groups, and Substandard Air Quality Areas: An Analysis of Regional
and Urban Patterns. Argonne, IL: Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division
Argonne National Laboratory, (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 53
West, Patrick C. "Minority Anglers and Toxic Fish Consumption: Evidence of the State-Wide
Survey of Michigan." In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan
Bryant and Paul Mohai (1989).
. "Health Concerns for Fish-Eating Tribes?" EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)15-16 (March/April
1992).
Westbrooks, Aricka Marie. Wyandotte County, Kansas: A Study of Hazardous Waste and Environmental
Justice. Thesis (M.S.)-Iowa State University, (1994).
Wheeler, David L. "When the Poor Face Environmental Risks." Chronicle of Higher Education,
(v)40 (n)25, (p)A10 (February 1994).
White, J.M. "Distributive Justice and Environmental Ethics at Yucca Mountain: Another View."
The International Journal of Environmental Studies, (v)38 (n)2, (p)103 (1991).
Who Pays the Price? The Sociocultural Context of Environmental Crisis. Washington, DC: Island
Press, (1994).
Wigley, Daniel C. and Kristin Shrader-Frechette. "Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case
Study." Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, (v)9 (n)l, (pp)61-82 (1996).
Wilk, V.A. "The EPA Proposed Worker Protection Regulations - A Critique." Migrant Health
Clinical Supplement of the National Migrant Referral Project, Inc., (1988).
Wilkinson, C.H. "New Approach for Environmental Justice Impact Assessment." Annual Conference
of the National Association of Environmental Professionals: Practical Environmental Directions
- A Changing Agenda, (March 1996).
Williams, Guy O. "A Personal Commitment to Environmental Justice." St. John's Journal of
Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)585 (1994).
Williams, Serena M. "The Anticipatory Nuisance Doctrine- One Common Law Theory for Use in
Environmental Justice Cases." William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, (v)19
(n)2, (p)223 (Spring 1995).
Williard, W. "Environmental Racism: The Merging of Civil Rights and Environmental Activism."
Southern University Law Review, (v)31 (Fall 1992/Spring 1993).
Willoh, Don and Tom Collins. "Environmental Justice and TSD [Treatment, Storage and Disposal]
Siting Policies: Title VI is the Plaintiffs' Newest and Best Weapon, But Will It Succeed."
Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, (v)3 (n)2, (p)78 (1996).
Wink, Walter. "Ecobible: The Bible and Ecojustice." Theology Today, (v)49 (n)4, (p)465 (1993).
Wisner, Ben. "The Reconstruction of Environmental Rights in Urban South Africa." Human Ecology:
An Interdisciplinary Journal. (v)23 (n)2, (pp)259-288 (1995).
Wissow, L.S. "Poverty, Race, and Hospitalization for Childhood Asthma." American Journal
of Public Health, (v)78 (p)7 (July).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 54
Wiygul, Robert B., Sharon Carr Harrington and Florence T. Robinson. "Environmental Justice
in Rural Communities." West Virginia Law Review, (v)96 (n)2, (p)405 (Winter 1993).
Wolpert, Julian. "Regressive Siting of Public Facilities." Natural Resources Journal, (v)16
(p)103 (1976).
Women and the Environment: Crisis and Development in the Third World. New York, NY: Monthly
Review Press, (1991).
"Women's Environment & Development Organization - WEDO (Women and Environment)." WIN News,
(v)18 (n)4, (Autumn 1992).
Wong, O. and W.J. Bailey. "Cancer Incidence and Community Exposure to Air Emissions from Petroleum
and Chemical Plants in Contra Costa County, California: A Critical Epidemiological Assessment."
Journal of Environmental Health, (v)56 (n)5, (pp) 11-17 (1993).
"World Womens' Congress for a Healthy Planet: The North American Women's Regional Caucus Report."
Women & Environment, (v)13 (n)l, (p)6 (Fall-Winter 1991).
Wright, A. "Rethinking the Circle of Poison: The Politics of Pesticide Poisoning Among Mexican
Farm Workers." Latin American Perspectives, (v)13 (pp)26-59 (1986).
Wright, Beverly H. and Robert D. Bullard. "Hazards in the Workplace and Black Health." National
Journal of Sociology, (v)4 (pp)45-62 (1990).
Wright, R.G. "Hazardous Waste Disposal and the Problems of Stigmatic and Racial Injury."
Arizona State Law Journal, (v)23 (pp)777-800 (1991).
Yamamoto, Andrew J. "The Fight for Environmental Justice: New Skirmishes in the Battle Against
Injustice." Chicano-Latino Law Review, (v)14 (p)30 (Winter 1994).
Young, M.D. Sustainable Investment and Resource Use: Equity, Environmental Integrity, and
Economic Efficiency. Park Ridge, NJ: Parthenon Publishing Group, (1992).
Zah, Peterson. "Environmental Justice and Cultural Conflict." Tulsa Journal of Comparative
& International Law, (v)2 (n)l, (p) 129 (Fall 1994).
Zeff, Robbin Lee. Not in My Backyard/Not in Anyone's Backyard: A Folkloristic Examination
of the American Grassroots Movement for Environmental Justice. Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana
University, (1989).
Zimmerman, Rae. "Social Equity and Environmental Risk." Risk Analysis, (v)13 (n)6, (pp)649-666
(1993).
Zupan, J.M. The Distribution of Air Quality in the New York Region. Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins University Press, (1973).
Zwerdling, Daniel. "Poverty and Pollution." Progressive, (v)37 (pp)25-29 (January 1973).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE BIBLIOGRAPHY
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
A. Philip Randolph Institute, Working for Environmental and Economic Justice and Jobs. (1976).
Abascal, Ralplr Santiago. "The Struggle for Environmental Justice: Legal Services Advocates
Tackle Environmental Poverty Law." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)459 (1995).
. "California Rural Legal Assistance and Environmental Justice." Chicano-Latino
Law Review, (v)14 (p)44 (Winter 1994).
"Access to Justice on Environmental Matters: A Case of Double Standards? — Greenpeace and
Others v Commission of the European Community." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)8 (n)l,
(p)139 (1996).
Adams, John A. "The Mainstream Environmental Movement: Predominantly White Memberships Are
Not Defensible." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)25-27 (1992).
Adikema, Friday Chibembudu. "Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd., v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc.:
Broadening Citizen's Locus Standi." Southern University Law Review, (v)20 (n)l, (p)69
(Spring 1993).
Albrecht, S.L. "Equity and Justice in Environmental Decision Making: A Proposed Research
Agenda." Society and Natural Resources, (v)8 (n)l, (pp)67-72 (1995).
Allen, Leslie. "Who Should Control Hazardous Waste on Native American Lands?" Ecology Law
Quarterly, (v)14 (n)l, (pp)69-116 (1987).
Alley, Kelly D., Charles E. Faupel and Conner Bailey. "The Historical Transformation of a
Grassroots Environmental Group." Human Organization, (Spring 1996).
Almeida, Paul. "The Network for Environmental and Economic Justice in the Southwest: Interview
with Richard Moore." Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, (v)5 (n)l, (pp)21-54 (March 1994).
Alonso, W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University, (1964).
Alston, Dana, ed. We Speak for Ourselves: Social Justice, Race and Environment. Washington,
DC: Panos Institute, (1990).
Alston, Dana. "Black, Brown, Poor and Poisoned: Minority Grassroots Environmentalism and
the Quest for Eco-Justice." Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, (v)68 (1991).
. "Transforming a Movement: People of Color Unite at Summit Against Environmental
Racism." Sojourners, (v)21 (pp)30-31 (January 1992).
. "Transforming a Movement." Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)2 (p)l (Fall
1991).
"Alternative Policy Institute of the Center for Third World Organizing." Toxics and Minority
Communities: Issue PAC #2, (1986).
Ambler, Marjane. "On the Reservations: No Haste, No Waste." Planning, (v)57 (n)ll, (pp)26-29
(November 1991).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 2
American Association of Law Libraries, Environmental Equity Policy, Racism & Justice. Valencia,
CA: Duplicated by Mobiltape, (1994).
American Bar Association. Section of Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law, Forum
on Environmental Justice: April 29, 1994 Arlington, Texas, Arlington Hilton Hotel. Chicago,
IL: American Bar Association, (1994).
Anderson, Andy B. "Environmental Equity: Evaluating TSDF [Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facility] Siting Over the Past Two Decades." Waste Age, (pp)83-100 (July 1994).
Anderson, Christine Jezreela. The Hanford Nuclear Reservation and Radioactive Pollution in
the Columbia River Region: A Case of Environmental Racism; Possibilities for Environmental
Justice? Thesis (M.S.)—University of Oregon, (1994).
Anderson, J.E. "U.S. Population Distribution and the Location of Hazardous Waste Sites."
Population Association of America Annual Meeting, (April 1986).
Anderton, Douglas L. "Environmental Equity: The Demographics of Dumping." Demography, {v)31
(n)2, (1994).
Angel, Bradley. Toxic Threat to Indian Lands: A Greenpeace Report. San Francisco, CA: Greenpeace,
(1992).
Anonymous. "A Place at the Table: A Sierra Roundtable on Race, Justice, and the Environment."
Sierra, (v)78 (n)3, (p)50 (1993).
. "Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability with Environmental Justice."
National Wildlife Federation, (April 1994).
. "Environmental Policy Tainted by Racism: The Year in Review." The National Law
Journal, (v)15 (n)17-18, (p)S4,col.l (December 1992).
Anthony, Carl. "Why African Americans Should be Environmentalists." Racism Poverty and the
Environment, (v)l (p)5 (1990).
. "Rebuild the Cities: Urban Reconstruction." Earth Island Journal, {v) 7 (n)4,
(p)44 (Fall 1992).
Arrandale, Tom. "Environmentalism and Racism." Governing, (February 1992).
Asch, Peter and Joseph L. Seneca. "Some Evidence on the Distribution of Air Quality." Land
Economics, (v)54 (n)3, (pp)278-297 (1978).
Association of American Law Schools, Racism & Environmental Justice. Millersville, MD: Recorded
Resources Corp., (1994).
. 1996 AALS Annual Meeting: Environmental Justice, Parts 1-2. Recorded Resources
Corp., (1996).
Austin, D.F. Epidemiological Study of the Incidence of Cancer as Related to Industrial Emissions
in Contra Costa County, California. Report to the Environmental Protection Agency, (1984).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 3
Austin, Regina and Michael Schill. "Black, Brown, Poor and Poisoned: Minority Grassroots
Environmentalism and the Quest for Eco-Justice." Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy,
(v)l (n)l, (p)69 (1991).
Babcock, Hope. "Environmental Justice Clinics: Visible Models of Justice." Stanford Environmental
Law Journal, (v)14 (n)l, (p)3 (1995).
"Backyards, NIMBYs, [Not In My Back Yard] and Incinerator Sitings: Implications for Social
Movement Theory." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l,.(p)25 (February 1993).
Bailey, Conner and Charles E. Faupel. "Environmental Justice: Mobilization of a Social Movement."
Proceedings of a Preconference of the 50th Annual Professional Agricultural Workers Conference,
Tuskegee University, (pp)51-60 (1993).
. "Movers and Shakers and PCB [Polychlorinated Biphenyl] Takers: Hazardous Waste
and Community Power." Sociological Spectrum, (v)13 (pp)89-115 (1992).
. "Environmentalism and Civil Rights in Sumter County, Alabama." Race and the Incidence
of Environmental Hazards, (pp)140-152 (1992).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and James H. Gundlach. "Environmental Politics in Alabama's
Blackbelt." In Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Ed. Robert
Bullard Boston, MA: South End Press, (1993).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and Kelly D. Alley. "Environmental Justice: Mobilization
of a Grassroots Social Movement." Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, (v)2 (n)4,
(p)3 (1994).
Bailey, Conner, Charles E. Faupel and Susan H. Holland. "Hazardous Wastes and Differing Perceptions
of Risk in Sumter County, Alabama." Society and Natural Resources, (v)V (pp)21-36 (1992).
Bailey, Conner, et al. "Environmental Justice and the Professional." In Environmental Justice:
Issues, Policies, and Solutions. Ed. Bunyan Bryant Washington, DC: Island Press, (1995).
Bari, J. and J. Kohl. "Environmental Justice: Highlander After Myles." Social Policy, (v)21
(n)3, (pp)71-77 (Winter 1991).
Barkham, J.P. "Environmental Needs and Social Justice." Biodiversity and Conservation, (v)4
(n)8, (p)857 (November 1995).
Barnett, P.G. Survey of Research on the Impacts of Pesticides on Agricultural Workers and
the Rural Environment, Working Paper No. 2. Davis, CA: California Institute of Rural
Studies, (1989).
Barry, Tom and Beth Sims. The Challenge of Cross Border Environmentalism: The U.S.-Mexico
Case. The Inter-Hemispheric Education Resource Center, Resource Center Press and Border
Ecology Project, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 4
Barsh, R. "Indigenous Peoples, Racism and the Environment." Meanjin, (v)49 (n)4, (pp)723-731
(Summer 1990).
Basquet, C.R. "Socioeconomic Factors and Cancer Incidence Among Black and Whites." Journal
of the National Cancer Institute, (v)83 (pp)551-557 (1991).
Baugh, Joyce A. and John H. Baugh. "African-Americans and the Environment: A Review Essay."
Policy Studies Journal, (v)19 (n)2, (pp)182-191 (1991).
Baumol, W.J. and W.E. Oates. Economics, Environmental Policy, and the Quality of Life. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, (1979).
Beasley, Conger and J.C. Leacock. "Of Pollution and Poverty (Part III). " Buzzworm: The Environmental
Journal, (v)2 (pp)39-45 (September/October 1990).
Beasley, Conger. "Of Pollution and Poverty." Buzzworm: The Environmental Journal, (v)2 (n)3,
(pp)10-17 (May/June 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty (Part II)." Buzzworm: The Environmental Journal, (v)2
(n)5, (pp)38-46 (September/October 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Reaping America's Unseemly Harvest." Buzzworm, (v)2
(n)3, (pp)40-47 (May/June 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Keeping Watch in Cancer Alley." Buzzworm, (v)2 (n)4,
(pp)39-45 (July/August 1990).
. "Of Pollution and Poverty: Deadly Threat on Native Lands." Buzzworm, (v)2 (n)5,
(pp)39-45 (September/October 1990).
Been, Vicki. "What's Fairness Got to Do With It?: Environmental Justice and the Siting of
Locally Undesirable Land Uses." Cornell University Law Review, (v)78 (n)6, (pp)1001-1085
(September 1993).
. "Analyzing Evidence of Environmental Justice." Journal of Land Use & Environmental
Law, (v)ll (n)l, (p)l (1995).
. "Locally Undesirable Land Uses in Minority Neighborhoods: Disproportionate Siting
or Market Dynamics?" Yale Law Journal, (v)103 (n)6, (pp)1383-1422 (April 1994).
Belliveau, Michael, Michael Kent and Grant Rosenblum. Richmond at Risk: Community Demographics
and Toxic Hazards from Industrial Polluters. San Francisco, CA: Citizens for a Better
Environment, (1989).
Beloff, Michael. "The Injunction in Environmental Law." The New Law Journal, (v)142 (n)6545,
(p)428 (March 1992).
Bembry, L. and R. Woerner. "Environmental Justice - The New Kid on the Block." Journal of
Forestry, (v)92 (n)9, (p)68 (1994).
Bennet, James. "Hispanic Voters and the Politics of Sludge." New York Times, 5 March 1993,
(P)B1.
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 5
Berkovitz, Dan M. "Pariah and Prophets: Nuclear Energy, Global Warming, and Intergenerational
Justice." Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, (v)17 (n)2, (p)245 (1992).
Binder, Denis. "Index of Environmental Justice Cases." The Urban Lawyer, (v)27 (n)l, (p)163
(Winter 1995).
"Black, Brown, Red, and Poisoned." The Humanist, (v)54 (n)4, (p)9 (July 1994).
Blackman, Stephen Edward. "Bad Faith and the EAJA: A Proposal for Strict Scrutiny of Government
Fee Litigation Under the EAJA [Equal Access to Justice Act]," Environmental Law, (v)20
(n)4, (p)975 (1990).
Blank, Linda D. "Seeking Solutions of Environmental Inequity: The Environmental Justice Act."
Environmental Law, (v)24 (n)3, (pp) 1109-1136 (July 1994).
Blowers, Andrew and Leroy Pieter. "Power, Politics and Environmental Inequality: A Theoretical
and Empirical Analysis of the Process of 'Peripheralisation'." Environmental Politics,
(v)3 (n)2, (pp) 197-229 (Summer 1994).
Boerner, Christopher and Thomas Lambert. Environmental Justice. St. Louis, MO: Center for
the Study of American Business, Washington University, (1994).
. "Environmental Injustice." Public Interest, (v) 118 (pp)61-83 (Winter 1995).
Boerner, Christopher. Environmental Justice in the City of St. Louis. the Economics of Siting
Industrial and Waste Facilities. St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
Washington University, (1994).
. Environmental Justice? St. Louis, MO: Center for the Study of American Business,
Washington University, (1994).
Bond, Richard G. Salvationists, Utilitarians, and Environmental Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Ramapo
College, (1976).
. "Salvationists, Utilitarians, and Environmental Justice." Alternatives, (v)6
(n)3, (p)31 (1977).
Booth, Annie L. and Harvey M. Jacobs. "Ties That Bind: Native American Beliefs as a Foundation
for Environmental Consciousness." Environmental Ethics, (v)12 (n)l, (pp)27-43 (1990).
Boulard, G. "Combating Environmental Racism." Christian Science Monitor, (v)17 (p)8 (March
1993).
Bowden, Holly J. Environmental Justice in Contemporary American Politics. Norton, MA: Wheaton
College, (1995).
Bowen, W., M. Sailing and E. Cryan. "The Spatial Association between Race, Income and Industrial
Toxic Emissions in Cuyahoga County, Ohio." Annual Meeting of the Association of American
Geographers, Atlanta, (May 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 6
Bowyer, and Luke W. Cole. "Pesticides and the Poor in California." Race, Poverty and the
Environment, (v)2 (1992).
Boyce, J.K. "Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation." Ecological Economics, (v)l 1
(n)3, (pp)169-178 (December 1994).
Boyle, E.P. "It's Not Easy Being Green: The Psychology of Racism, Environmental Discrimination,
and the Argument for Modernizing Equal Protection." Vanderbilt Law Review, (v)6 (n)4,
(pp)937-989 (May 1993).
Braden, Anne. "Environmental Justice = Social Justice." Labor Research Review, (n)20, (p)63
(Spring 1993).
Braile, Robert. "Is Racism a Factor in Siting Undesirable Facilities?" Garbage, (v)6 (n)2,
(pp) 13-17 (Summer 1994).
Brajer, J. "Recent Evidence on the Distribution of Air Pollution Effects." Contemporary Policy
Issues, (v)10 (April 1992).
Brigham, E.F. "The Determinants of Residential Land Use." Land Economics, (v)41 (n)4, (pp)325-334
(1965).
Brion, Denis J. "An Essay on LULU [Locally Unwanted Land Use], NIMBY [Not In My Back Yard]
and the Problem of Distributive Justice." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review,
(v)15 (n)3-4, (p)437 (Spring 1988).
Brown, Alice L. "Environmental Justice and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (The
Fair Housing Act)." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)741 (1995).
. "Environmental Justice: New Civil Rights Frontier." Trial, (v)29 (n)7, (p)48
(July 1993).
Brown, Phil and Edwin J. Mikelson. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, (1990).
Brown, Phil. Society and Health Working Group, Boston Massachusetts. (February 1994).
Browne, . "The Summit that Changed the Color of Environmentalism." Panoscope, (v)28 (pp)21-22
(1992).
Bruce, Calvin E. "Environmentalism and Student Activism." Black Collegian, (v)23 (n)4, (p)52
(March/April 1993).
Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai, eds. Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time
for Discourse. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1992).
Bryant, Bunyan, ed. Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions. Washington,
DC: Island Press, (1995).
Bryant, Bunyan. "Pollution Prevention and Participatory Research as a Methodology for Environmental
Justice." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)589 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 7
Bryant, Pat. "Tenants and Toxics." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)27 (Winter 1993).
. "Toxics and Racial Justice." Social Policy, (v)20 (n)l, (pp)48-53 (Summer 1989).
Bullard, Robert D. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Boston,
MA: South End Press, (1993).
. In Search of the New South: The Black Urban Experience in the 1970s and 1980s.
Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, (1991).
. "The Politics of Race and Pollution: An Interview with Robert Bullard." Multinational
Monitor, (v)13 (n)6, (pp)22-25 (June 1992).
. "Environmental Justice for All: It's the Right Thing to Do." Journal of Environmental
Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)281 (1994).
. Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color. San Francisco,
CA: Sierra Club Press, (1994).
. "The Threat of Environmental Racism." Natural Resources and Environment, (v)7
(n)3, (pp)23-26 (1993).
. "Solid Waste Sites and the Black Houston Community." Social Inquiry, (v)53 (pp)273-288
(1983).
. "Environmental Racism." Environmental Protection, (v)2 (n)4, (pp)25-26 (June
1991).
. "Ecological Inequities and the New South: Black Communities Under Siege." Journal
of Ethnic Studies, (v)17 (n)4, (pp)lOl-l 15 (1990).
. "Environmental Justice for All." EnviroAction, (November 1991).
. "Just Transportation." Environmental Action, (v)28 (n)l, (p)19 (Spring 1996).
. "Waste and Racism: A Stacked Deck?" Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy,
(v)8 (pp)29-45 (Spring 1993).
. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview
Press, (1994).
. Invisible Houston: The Black Experience in Boom and Bust. College Station, TX:
Texas A&M University Press, (1987).
. "Environmental Disputes Resolution in Communities of Color." In Technology and
Environmental Interdisplinary Perspectives. Eds. Henry Gamery and James R. Fleming Akron,"
OH: University of Akron Press, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 8
. "Urban Infrastructure: Social, Environmental and Health Risks to African Americans."
The State of Black America, (1992).
. "Grassroots Flowering: The Environmental Justice Movement Comes of Age." The
Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (pp)32-37 (Spring 1994).
. People of Color Environmental Groups Directory 1994-95. Flint, MI: Charles Stewart
Mott Foundation, (1994).
. "In Our Backyards: Minority Communities Get Most of the Dumps." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp) 11-12 (March/April 1992).
. "Race and Environmental Justice in the United States." The Yale Journal of International
Law, (v)18 (n)l, (p)319 (Winter 1993).
. "Overcoming Racism in Environmental Decision Making." Environment, (v)36 (n)4,
(p)10 (May 1994).
. "Environmental Racism and Land Use." Land Use Forum: A Journal of Law, Policy,
& Practice, (v)2 (pp)6-ll (Spring 1993).
Bullard, Robert D. and Beverly H. Wright. "The Politics of Pollution: Implications for the
Black Community." Phylon, (v)47 (n)l, (pp)71-78 (1986).
. "The Quest for Environmental Equity: Mobilizing the African-American Community
for Social Change." Society and Natural Resources, (v)3 (pp)301-311 (1990).
. "Environmentalism and the Politics of Equity: Emergent Trends in the Black Community."
Mid-America Review of Sociology, (v)12 (pp)21-37 (1987).
. "Mobilizing the Black Community for Environmental Justice." Journal of Intergroup
Relations, (v)17 (n)l, (p)33 (Spring 1990).
. "Environmental Justice for All: Community Perspectives on Health and Research
Needs." Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (p)821 (1993).
. "Blacks and the Environment." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, (v)14 (n)l/2,
(pp) 165-184 (1987).
. "Blacks and the Environment." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, (v)14 (pp)165-84
(1987).
Bullard, Robert D. and Joe R. Reagin. "Racism and the City." In Urban Life in Transition.
Eds. Mark Gottdiener and C.G. Pickvance Newbury Park, CA: Sage,.
Burbank, . "Activists of Color are Confronting Environmental Racism." National Catholic Reporter,
(p)7 (October 1991).
Burch, William R. Jr. "The Peregrine Falcon and the Urban Poor: Some Sociological Interrelations."
In Human Ecology: An Environmental Approach. Eds. P. Richardson and J. McEvoy Belmont,
CA: Duxbury Press, (1976).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 9
Burke, Lauretta M. Environmental Equity in Los Angeles, Technical Report 93-6. Santa Barbara,
CA: National Center for Geographic Information & Analysis, Technical Report, (1993).
. "Race and Environmental Equity: A Geographic Analysis in Los Angeles." Geo Info
Systems, (v)3 (n)9, (pp)44-50 (October 1993).
Buttel, Frederick H. and William L. Flinn. "Social Class and Mass Environmental Beliefs:
A Reconsideration." Environment and Behavior, (v)l (pp)433-450 (1978).
Button, Gregory V. "What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You: The Right to Know and the Shetland
Island Oil Spill." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, (v)23 (n)2, (pp)241-263
(June 1995).
Byron, William J. Toward Stewardship: An Interim Ethic of Poverty, Power, and Pollution.
New York, NY: Paulist Press, (1975).
Cable, Sherry and Michael Benson. "Acting Locally: Environmental Injustice and the Emergence
of Grass-Roots Environmental Organizations." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)4, (p)464 (November
1993).
Cable, Sherry and Thomas Shriver. "Production and Extrapolation of Meaning in the Environmental
Justice Movement." Sociological Spectrum, (v)15 (n)4, (p)419 (October 1995).
California State Legislature, Senate, Urban Growth Policy Project, Prosperity, Equity, and
Environmental Quality: Meeting the Challenge of California's Growth: Final Findings
and Recommendations. (1991).
Camia, Catalina. "Poor, Minorities Want Voices in Environmental Choices." Congressional Quarterly
Weekly Report, (v)51 (n)34, (August 1993).
Canadian Environmental Network, The Green List: A Guide to Canadian Environmental Organizations
and Agencies. Ottawa, Ontario: The Canadian Environmental Network, (1994).
Capek, Stella M. "The "Environmental Justice" Frame: A Conceptual Discussion and an Application."
Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (p)5 (February 1993).
. "Section On Environmental Health Policy: Environmental Justice. Regulation,
and the Local Community." International Journal of Health Services, (v)22 (n)4, (p)729
(1992).
Capeless, Rosanne Gervasi. "History of Florida Water Law: Tracing the Ebb and Flow of Florida's
Public Trust Doctrine." Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, (v)9 (n)l, (p)131 (Fall
1993).
Carkeek, Jennifer Dawn. Environmental Justice: Does It Exist in the United States? Thesis
(B.A. Honors—Economics)-Bucknell University, (1995).
Carnes, S.A. and A'.K. Wolfe. "Research and Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Justice:
.Implications for NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] Documentation." National Association
of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and Exposition: Environmental Challenges
- The Next Twenty Years (20th), (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 10
Caron, Judi Anne. "Environmental Perspectives of Blacks: Acceptance of the 'New Environmental
Paradigm'." Journal of Environmental Education, (v)20 (n)3, (pp)21-26 (1989).
Carroll, Ginny. "When Pollution Hits Home." National Wildlife 29, (pp)30-39 (August/September
1991).
Cassel, Thomas A.V. and Terence P. Walmsley. "Environmental Justice in Hazardous Waste Siting."
Journal of Environmental Law & Practice, (v)2 (n)6, (p)48 (May 1995).
"Cause for Immediate Concern: Minorities and the Poor Clearly are More Exposed." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp)38-39 (March/April 1992).
Center for Investigating Reporting and Bill Moyers, Global Dumping Grounds: The International
Trade in Hazardous Waste. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press, (1990).
Centner, Terence J., Warren Kriesel and Andrew G. Keeler. "Environmental Justice and Toxic
Releases: Establishing Evidence of Discriminatory Effect Based on Race and Not Income."
Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal, (v)3 (n)2, (p) 119 (Summer 1996).
Cerrell Associates, Inc., Political Difficulties Facing Waste-to-Energy Conversion Plant Siting.
Prepared for the California Waste Management Board. California: Cerrell Associates,
Inc., (1984).
Chance, Norman A. and Elena N. Andreeva. "Sustainability, Equity, and Natural Resource Development
in Northwest Siberia and Arctic Alaska." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
(v)23 (n)2, (pp)217-242 (June 1995).
Chase, A.R. "Assessing and Addressing Problems Posed by Environmental Racism." Rutgers Law
Review, (v)45 (n)2, (pp)335-369 (Winter 1993).
Chavez, V. "A Native American Perspective: Our Land and Culture, Your Sensitivity and Respect."
OTHER VOICES - Environment, Community Development and Race, (v)l (Summer 1991).
Cheakalos, . "The Battle for 'Cancer Alley' Dumps." Atlanta Constitution, 23 February 1992,
(P)B4.
Chisolm, J. "The Continuing Hazard of Lead Exposure and Its Effects in Children." NeuroToxicology,
(v)5 (p)3 (1984).
Chu, . "Dangers in the Workplace." Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)3 (p)l0 (Spring
1992).
Churchill, Ward. Struggle for the Land: Indigenous Resistance to Genocide, Ecocide, and Expropriation
in Contemporary North America. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, (1993).
Clayton, Susan. "Appeals to Justice in the Environmental Debate." The Journal of Social Issues,
(v)50 (n)3, (p)13 (1994).
Clean Sites, Hazardous Waste Sites and the Rural Poor: A Preliminary Assessment. (March
1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 11
Coggin, Terrance P. and John M. Seidl. Politics American Style: Race, Environment and Central
Cities. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, (1972).
Cohen, Gary. "Toward a Spirituality Based on Justice and Ecology." Social Policy, (v)26 (n)3,
(p)6 (Spring 1996).
Cohen, Line. "Waste Dumps Toxic Traps for Minorities." The Chicago Reporter, (v)21 (n)4,
(April 1992).
Cohen, Maurie J. "The Spatial Distribution of Toxic Chemical Emissions: Implications for
Nonmetropolitan Areas." Society and Natural Resources, (September 1995).
Cole, Luke W. "Environmental Justice Litigation: Another Stone in David's Sling." The Fordham
Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)523 (Spring 1994).
. "Community-Based Administrative Advocacy Under Civil Rights Law: A Potential
Environmental Justice Tool." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)360 (1995).
. "Legal Services, Public Participation, and Environmental Justice." Clearinghouse
Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)449 (1995).
. "Remedies for Environmental Racism: A View from the Field (response to Rachel
D. Godsil, Michigan Law Review, (v) 90, (p) 394)." Michigan Law Review, (v)90 (n)7, (pp) 1991-1997
(June 1992).
. "Civil Rights, Environmental Justice and the EPA: The Brief History of Administrative
Complaints Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Journal of Environmental
Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)309 (1994).
. "Empowerment as the Key to Environmental Protection: The Need for Environmental
Poverty Law." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)19 (n)14, (pp)619-683 (1992).
Coleman, Leslie Ann. "It's the Thought That Counts: The Intent Requirement in Environmental
Racism Claims." St. Mary's Law Journal, (v)25 (n)l, (pp)447-492 (1993).
Collette, W. "Somewhere Else USA: Fighting Back Against Chemical Dumpers." Southern Neighborhoods,
(v)9 (pp)l-3 (September 1985).
Collin, Dave. "Confronting Environmental Racism." Industrial Worker, (v)88 (p) 10 (October
1991).
Collin, Robert W. "Environmental Equity: Law and Planning Approach to Environmental Racism."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)ll (pp)495-546 (Summer 1992).
. "Environmental Equity and the Need for Government Intervention." Environment,
(v)35 (n)9, (p)41 (November 1993).
. "Review of the Legal Literature on Environmental Racism, Environmental Equity,
and Environmental Justice." Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)l, (p)121
(1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 12
Collin, Robert W., Timothy Beatley and William Harris. "Environmental Racism: A Challenge
to Community Development." Journal of Black Studies, (v) 25 (n)3, (pp)354-377 (January
1995).
Collins, S.S. "Environmental Justice: The Role of Epidemiology in Protecting Unempowered
Communities from Environmental Hazards." Science of the Total Environment, (v)184 (n)(l-2),
(pp)67-76 (1996).
Colopy, James H. "The Road Less Traveled: Pursuing Environmental Justice Through Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Stanford Environmental Law Journal, (v)13 (n)l, (p)125
(January 1994).
Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Politics, Endangered Peoples: Indigenous
Rights and the Environment. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado, (1994).
Colquette, Kelly M. and Elizabeth A. Henry Robertson. "Environmental Racism: The Causes,
Consequences, and Commendations." Tulane Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (pp)153-207
(1991).
Colten, C. "Historical Hazards: The Geography of Relic Industrial Wastes." The Professional
Geographer, (v)42 (n)2, (pp) 149-161 (1990).
Constanza, Chuck. Environmental Justice. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures,
(1995).
Coplan, K. "Protecting Minority Communities with Environmental Civil Rights Claims." New
York Law Journal, (August 1991).
Corburn, Jason. Pursuing Justice in Environmental Decision Making: Deliberative Democracy
and Consensus Building. Thesis (M.C.P.)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1996).
Cordera-Guzman, Hector R. "Lessons from Operation Bootstrap." NACLA Report on the Americas,
(v)27 (n)3, (p)7 (November/December 1993).
"Corporate Power and the Struggle for Environmental and Economic Justice." Beyond Law: Mas
Alia Del Derecho, (v)4 (n)12, (p)105 (April 1995).
Coughlin, S.S. "Environmental Justice: The Role of Epidemiology in Protecting Unempowered
Communities from Environmental Hazards." Science of the Total Environment, (v)184 (n)l,
(p)67 (May 1996).
Council of Planning Librarians, Environmental Discrimination: An Annotated Bibliography.
Council of Planning Librarians Bibliography Series no.306,.
"Cover Story. Tax Justice for the Earth." Friends of the Earth, (v) 24 (n)3, (p)7 (March 1994).
Coye, M.J. "The Health Effects of Agricultural Production: 1. The Health of Agricultural
Workers." Journal of Public Health Policy, (v)6 (pp)349-370 (1985).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 13
Crawford, Colin. "Strategies for Environmental Justice: Rethinking CERCLA Medical Monitoring
Lawsuits." Boston University Law Review, (v)74 (n)2, (p)267 (March 1994).
Cushman, John H. "EPA's New Focus on Threat to the Poor." New York Times, (January 1992).
Cutter, Susan L. "Race Class and Environmental Justice." Progress in Human Geography, (v)19
(n)l, (pp) 107-118 (1995).
Cutter, Susan L. and William Solecki. "The National Pattern of Airborne Toxic Releases."
The Professional Geographer, (v)41 (n)2, (pp)149-161 (1989).
Cutter, Susan L., Danika Holm and Lloyd Clark. "The Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring
Environmental Justice." Risk Analysis: An International Journal, (v)16 (n)4, (p)517
(August 1996).
Cvetkovitch, George and Timothy C. Earle. "The Construction of Justice: A Case Study of Public
Participation in Land Management. (Green Justice: Conceptions of Fairness and the Natural
World)." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (n)3, (pp) 161-179 (Fall 1994).
Davies, J. Clarence and Barbara S. Davies. The Politics of Pollution, 2nd, Edition. Indianapolis,
IN: Pegasus, (1975).
Davies, J.E. "Problems of Prevalence of Pesticide Residues in Humans." Pesticide Monitoring
Journal, (v)2 (p)86 (1968).
Davos, Climis A. "Group Environmental Preference Aggregation: The Principle of Environmental
Justice." Journal of Environmental Management, (v)22 (n)l, (p)55 (1986).
Day, Barbara. "Environmental Racism Puts Toxics in Communities of Color." Guardian, (v)42
(p)5 (April 1990).
. "Do You Have to be White to be Green." Earth. Island Journal, (v)6 (p)41 (Spring
1991).
De La Pena, Nonny. "Fighting for the Environment." Hispanic, (pp)18-23 (March 1991).
De-Shalit, A. "Environmental Policies and Justice Between Generations: On the Need for a
Comprehensive Theory of Justice Between Generations." European Journal of Political Research,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)307 (April 1992).
Denno, Deborah W. "Considering Lead Poisoning as a Criminal Defense." Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)20 (n)3, (pp)377-400 (1993).
Denton, N.A. and D.S. Massey. "Residential Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians by
Socioeconomic Status and Generation." Social Science Quarterly, (v)69 (n)4, (pp)797-817
(1988).
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station,
Auburn University, "Public Opinions and Attitudes Regarding Hazardous Waste in Alabama:
Results from Three 1988 Surveys." Rural Sociology Series No. 14, (p)128 (September 1989).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 14
Derman, Bill and Anne Ferguson. "Human Rights, Environment, and Development: The Dispossession
of Fishing Communities on Lake Malawi." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
(v)23 (n)2, (pp)125-143 (June 1995).
Derr, P., et al. "Responding to the Double Standard of Worker/Public Protection." Environment,
(v)25 (n)6, (1983).
DiChiro, Giovanna. "Defining Environmental Justice: Womens' Voices and Grassroots Politics."
Socialist Review, (v)22 (n)4, (p)93 (October 1992).
Dinkins, Carol E. "Impact of the Environmental Justice Movement on American Industry and Local
Government." Administrative Law Review, (v)47 (n)3, (p)337 (Summer 1995).
Discrimination American Style: Institutional Racism and Sexism, 2nd Edition. Malabar, FL:
Krieger Publishing Co., (1978).
Doll, R. and R. Peto. "The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of
Cancer in the United States Today." Journal of the National Cancer Institute, (v)66 (pp) 1193-1308
(1981).
Dowie, Mark. "The New Environmentalism." Utne Reader, (v)52 (pp)104-lll (July/August 1992).
Doyle, Kevin. "Environmental Justice: A Growing Movement." The Black Collegian, (v)24 (n)4,
(p)36 (March 1994).
Dubin, Jon C. "From Junkyards to Gentrification: Explaining a Right to Protective Zoning
in Low-Income Communities of Color." Minnesota Law Review, (v)77 (n)4, (pp)739-801 (April
1993).
Durett, Dan. Environmental Justice: Breaking New Ground. Washington, DC: Committee of the
National Institute for the Environment, (1994).
"EPA Watch." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)10, (p)445A (October 1995).
Easterling, J. Bennett and James S. Poles. "Environmental Justice: Implications for Siting
of Federal Radioactive Waste Management Facilities." Proceedings of the 5th Annual International
Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management. Part 1 (of 4) Las Vegas, NV, (1994).
Easton, Billy. "WHEACT for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)24 (n)4, (p)31 (Winter 1993).
Eckholm, E. and J. Scherr. "Double Standards and the Pesticide Trade." New Scientist, (v)77
(pp)221-243 (1978).
Ecologist, Whose Common Future: Reclaiming the Commons. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers,
(1993).
Edelstein, Michael R. "Global Dumping Ground." Multinational Monitor, (v)ll (pp)26-29 (October
1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 15
. Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential
Toxic Exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1987).
Edwards, Alan F. Environmental Protection, Accountability, and Social Justice: An Analysis
of Environmental Mediation. Thesis (Honors)-College of William and Mary, (1988).
Edwards, Mencer Donahue. "Sustainability and People of Color." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)4, (pp)50-52
(September/October 1992).
Eichstaedt, Peter H. If You Poison Us: Uranium and Native Americans. Santa Fe, NM: Red
Crane Books, (1994).
Ellis, Ralph D. "Quantifying Distributive Justice: An Approach to Environmental and Risk-Related
Public." Policy Sciences, (v)26 (n)2, (p)99 (May L993).
Ember, Lois R. "EPA Giving Increased Priority to Environmental Equity Issues." Chemical &
Engineering News, (v)72 (n)4, (pp)22-24 (January 1994).
. "Minorities Still More Likely to Live Near Toxic Sites." Chemical & Engineering
News, (v)72 (n)36, (p)19 (September 1994).
"Empowerment Lawyering: The Role of Trial Publicity in Environmental Justice." Boston College
Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23 (n)3, (p)567 (Spring 1996).
Environmental Careers Organization, Beyond the Green: Redefining and Diversifying the Environmental
Movement. (1992).
Environmental Health Coalition, Toxic-Free Neighborhoods Community Planning Guide. San Diego,
CA: Environmental Health Coalition, (1993).
"Environmental Justice Advanced by Executive Order." Chemical Week, (v)154 (n)7, (p)15 (February
1994).
Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: Greenpeace, (1995).
Environmental Justice Cases: Cases Involving Challenges to Environmental Decisions that Raise
Claims of Race or National Origin Discrimination. Washington, DC: Lawyers' Committee
for Civil Rights Under Law, (1993).
Environmental Justice News. Washington, DC: General Board of Church and Society of the United
Methodist Church, (1993).
Environmental Justice Project. Legal Forum, Civil Rights and the Environment: Bridging the
Disciplines: The Environmental Justice Project of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights
Under Law. Washington, DC: Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, (1993).
Environmental Justice Transition Group, Recommendations to the Presidential Transition Team
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Environmental Justice. Washington, DC:
The Group, (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 16
"Environmental Justice: An Issue for States." Proceedings of the 1996 7th Annual International
Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management, (1996).
"Environmental Justice: Racial Gerrymandering for Environmental Siting Decisions." Virginia
Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)665 (1995).
"Environmental Justice: Special Section." The Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (pp)32-43 (1994).
Environmental Justice: The 1993 Quinn, Ward, Kershaw Environmental Symposioum. Baltimore,
MD: University of Maryland School of Law, (1993).
"Environmental Justice: The Department of Energy's Response to Executive Order 12898." Proceedings
of the 1996 7th Annual International Conference on High Radioactive Waste Management Las
Vegas, NV, (pp)483-484 (1996).
Environmental Justice. Chicago, IL: National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc., (1995).
Environmental Quality and Social Justice in Urban America. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation,
(1974).
"Environmental Racism Claims Brought Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act." Environmental
Law, (v)25 (n)2, (p)285 (1995).
Environmental Rights: Law, Litigation & Access to Justice. London: Cameron May, (1995).
Environmental Risk, Environmental Values, and Political Choices: Beyond Efficiency Trade-offs
in Public Policy Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1993).
Epstein, Joel J. Law Enforcement Response to Environmental Crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, (1995).
Erickson, Kai. A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community.
New York, NY: W.W. Norton, (1994).
Ervin, Mike. "Company Will Not Build Plant; Lawyers Hail Victory. (Formosa Plastics Corp.
Will Not Add Another Factory to Louisiana's 'Cancer Alley')." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)7, (p)3 (October 1992).
. "The Toxic Doughnut: Toxic Wastes in Minority Neighborhoods." Progressive, (\)56
(n)l, (p)15 (January 1992).
"Ethnic Minorities - An Environmental Issue?" Ecos, (v)9 (n)3, (p)2 (1988).
"European Court of Justice: Case Reports." European Environmental Law Review, (v)5 (n)6,
(p)188 (June 1996).
"European Court of Justice: Environmental Cases 1995." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)8
(n)l, (p) 191 (1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 17
Evans, Lara. "Safeguarding Sacred Lands: On Tour for Environmental Justice." Winds of Change:
A Magazine for American Indians, (v)10 (n)4, (p)28 (Fall 1995).
Everson, Roy Arnold. "Bellona: Champion of Environmental Justice." The Norseman, (v)30 (n)2,
(p)10 (March 1990).
Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman
& Littlefield, (1995).
"Facility Siting, Section of Natural Resources, Energy and Environmental Law." Natural Resources
& Environment, (v)7 (n)3, (Winter 1993).
Fagge, . "The Hazardous Waste Controversy and the Struggle for Change." In Environmental
Racism: Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Fahsbender, John H. "An Analytical Approach to Defining the Affected Neighborhood in the Environmental
Justice Context." New York University Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (n)l, (p)120 (1996).
Fairley, P. "Environmental Justice - Economics Blamed in St. Louis Siting Disparities Study."
Chemical Week, (v)25 (pp)8-8 (June 1995).
Faupel, Charles S., Conner Bailey and Gary Griffin. "Local Media Roles in Defining Hazardous
Waste as a Social Problem: The Case of Sumter County, Alabama." Sociological Spectrum,
(v)ll (n)4, (pp)293-319 (1991).
Ferrante, Maria A. "Exploring Oral Traditions, Environmental Awareness, and Peace and Justice."
The Catholic Library World, (v)63 (n)3, (p) 163 (January 1992).
Ferris, Deeohn. "New Public Policy Tools in the Grassroots Movement: The Washington Office
on Environmental Justice." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)711 (Summer
1995).
Filosa, Richard M. "United States v. Goodner Brothers Aircraft, Inc.: Environmental Justice
or Disaster?" New England Law Review, (v)28 (n)l, (p)133 (Fall 1993).
Finkel, Adam M. and Dominic Golding. "Alternative Paradigms: Comparative Risk is Not the
Only Model." EPA Journal, (pp)50-52 (January/February/March 1993).
Fischer, Michael L. "Building Bridges: Common Causes Unite the Environmental Justice Movement."
The National Voter, (pp)13-14 (June/July 1993).
Fisher, Elizabeth. "Risk, Justice and Independent Contractors: The Demise of the Rule in
Rylands v. Gletcher in Australia." Journal of Environmental Law, (v)7 (n)2, (p)199 (1995).
Fisher, Maria Ramirez. "On the Road From Environmental Racism to Environmental Justice."
Villanova Environmental Law Journal, (v)5 (n)2, (p)449 (1994).
Fisher, Michael. "Environmental Racism Claims Brought Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act."
Environmental Law, (v)25 (n)2, (pp)285-334 (Spring 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 18
Fitton, Laura. A Study of the Correlation Between the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities
and Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics. Washington, DC: Center for Policy Alternatives,
(1992).
. Environmental Justice: Annotated Bibliography. Washington, DC: Center for Policy
Alternatives, (1994).
Flynn-Siler, Julia. "'Environmental Racism': It Could be a Messy Fight." BusinessWeek,
(p) 116 (May 1991).
"Focus. Environmental Equity: A New Coalition for Justice." Environmental Health Perspective:
ehp, (v)101 (n)6, (p)478 (November 1993).
Foreman Jr., Christopher H. "A Winning Hand?" The Brookings Review, (v)14 (n)2, (p)22 (Spring
1996).
"The Forum: The Assistant AG [Attorney General] for Environment." The Environmental Forum,
(v)ll (n)l, (p)40 (January 1994).
Foster, Sheila. "Race(ial) Matters: The Quest for Environmental Justice." Ecology Law Quarterly,
(v)20 (n)4, (p)721 (1993).
Freeman, A. Myrick. "The Distribution of Environmental Quality." Environmental Quality Analysis:
Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, (1972).
Freudenberg, N. "Citizen Action for Environmental Health: Report on a Survey of Community
Organizations." American Journal of Public Health, (v)74 (n)5, (pp)444-448 (1984).
Freudenburg, William R. and Susan K. Pastor. "NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard] and LULUs [Locally
Unwanted Land Use]: Stalking the Syndrome." Journal of Social Issues, (v)48 (n)4, (p)39
(Winter 1992).
Friedman-Jimenez, George. "Achieving Environmental Justice: The Role of Occupational Health."
The Fordham Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)605 (Spring 1994).
Fugazzotto, Peter. "Angling for Environmental Justice." Earth Island Journal, (v)9 (n)3,
(p)19 (Summer 1994).
Funk, William. "Justice Breyer and Environmental Law." The Administrative Law Journal of
the American University, (v)8 (n)4, (p)735 (Winter 1995).
Furino, and Munoz. "Health Status Among Hispanics." Journal of the American Medical Association,
(v)265 (p)255 (January 1991).
Galacatos, Theodora. "The United States Department of Justice Environmental Crimes Section:
A Case Study of Inter- and Intrabranch Conflict." Fordham Law Review, (v)64 (n)2, (p)587
(November 1995).
Garcia, Arnoldo. "Environmental Inequalities." Crossroads, (v)16 (pp) 18-19 (June 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 19
Gardner, Florence Catherine. Environmental Justice Organizing and Economic Change in the Southern
United States. Thesis (M.A. in Geography)-University of California, Berkeley, (1993).
Gauna, Eileen. "Federal Environmental Citizen Provisions: Obstacles and Incentives on the
Road to Environmental Justice." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)22 (n)l, (p)l (1995).
Gay, Kathlyn. Pollution and the Powerless: The Environmental Justice Movement. New York,
NY: F. Watts, (1994).
Gaylord, Clarice and Elizabeth Bell. "Environmental Justice: A National Priority." In Paces
of Environmental Racism. Eds. P. Wenz and Westra L. Rowman Littlefield Publishers, Inc.,
(1995).
Gaylord, Clarice and Geraldine Trotty. "Protecting Endangered Communities." The Fordham Urban
Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)771 (1994).
Gaynor, Kevin R. "Frontier Justice." The Environmental Forum, (v)8 (n)2, (p)23 (March 1991).
Gedicks, Al. The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles Against Multinational
Corporations. Boston, MA: South End Press, (1994).
Gelobter, Michael. "Toward a Model of 'Environmental Discrimination'." In The Proceedings
of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, (1990).
. "The Meaning of Urban Environmental Justice." The Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)841 (Spring 1994).
. "The Distribution of Outdoor Air Pollution by Income and Race: 1970-1986." Masters
Thesis, Energy and Resource Group, (1988).
. The Distribution of Air Pollution by Income and Race. Berkeley, CA: University
of California, Master's Project, Energy and Resource Group, (1989).
. Race, Class, and Outdoor Air Pollution: The Dynamics of Environmental Discrimination
from 1970 to 1990. Dissertation, (1993).
George, D.B. "Wastewater Environmental Justice in Small Communities." 212th American Chemical
Society National Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA, (August 1996).
Geradin, Damien. "Free Trade and Environmental Protection in an Integrated Market: A Survey
of Case Law of the United States Supreme Court." Journal of Transnational Law & Policy,
(v)2 (n)l, (p)141 (Spring 1993).
Gerrard, Michael B. "The Role of Existing Environmental Legislation in the Environmental Justice
Movement." St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)555 (1994).
Gianessi, Leonard and Henry M. Peskin. "The Distribution of Federal Water Pollution Control
Policy in the U.S.." Land Economics, (v)l (1980).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 20
Gianessi, Leonard. "The Distributional Effects of Uniform Air Pollution Policy in the U.S.."
Quarterly Journal of Economics, (pp)281-301 (May 1979).
Gibbons, A. "Does War on Cancer Equal War on Poverty?" Science, (v)253 (p)260 (1991).
Gilbert, Debbie. "Environmental Racism: Why Hazardous Waste Has Become a Civil Rights Issue."
Memphis Flyer, (v)141 (pp)9-ll (October 31/November 6 1991).
Giordano, Toni. "Environmental Justice: How Does It Influence the Permitting Process." Journal
of Environmental Permitting, (v)4 (n)l, (p)25 (Winter 1994).
Glaser, James M. "Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in
the South." Journal of Politics, (v)56 (n)l, (pp)21-42 (February 1994).
Glick, Richard D. "Environmental Justice in the United States: Implications of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights." The Harvard Environmental Law Review: HELR,
(v)19 (n)l, (p)69 (1995).
Glickman, Theodore S. and Robert Hersh. Evaluating Environmental Equity: The Impacts of Industrial
Hazards on Selected Social Groups in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Washington, DC:
Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 95-13, (1995).
Godsil, Rachel D. "Remedying Environmental Racism." Michigan Law Review, (v)90 (n)2, (pp)394-427
(November 1991).
Godsil, Rachel D. and James S. Freeman. "Jobs, Trees, and Autonomy: The Convergence of the
Environmental Justice Movement and Community Economic Development." Maryland Journal
of Contemporary Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)25 (1993).
Goldberg, Dan. "The Quest for Environmental Quality." MSWManagement, (pp)27-33 (March/April
1992).
Goldman, Benjamin A. The Truth About Where You Live: An Atlas for Action on Toxins and Mortality.
New York, NY: Times Books, (1991).
. "What is the Future of Environmental Justice?" Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)122 (April
1996).
. "Combating Environmental Racism." Chemistry & Industry, (v)2 (pp)72-72 (1995).
. Not Just Prosperity: Achieving Sustainability With Environmental Justice. Washington,
DC: National Wildlife Federation, (1993).
Goldman, Benjamin A. and Laura J. Fitton. Toxic Waste and Race Revisited. Washington, DC:
Center for Policy Alternatives, NAACP, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice,
(1994).
Goldsmith, M.F. "As Farmworkers Help Keep America Healthy, Illness May Be Their Harvest."
Journal of the American Medical Association, (v)261 (pp)3207-3213 (1989).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 21
Goldstein,. "Indoor Air Pollution: Exposure of Low-Income Inner City Residents." Environmental
International, (v)12 (pp)211-219 (1986).
Goodwin, Ellie. "Nexus of a New Environmentalism." Christianity and Crisis, (v)52 (p)54 (March
1992).
Gott, Nancy Christine. Environmental Justice and Participatory Democracy: An Emancipatory
Policy Proposal. Thesis (M.A.)-University of Nevada, Las Vegas, (1995).
Gottlieb, Robert and Andrew Fisher. "First Feed the Face: Environmental Justice Community
Food Security." Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)193 (April 1996).
Gottlieb, Robert. "A Question of Class: The Workplace Experience." Socialist Review, (v)22
(n)4, (pp)131-166 (October/December 1992).
. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement.
Washington, DC: Island Press, (1993).
Gould, J.M. Quality of Life in American Neighborhoods: Levels of Affluence, Toxic Waste,
and Cancer Mortality in Residential Zip Codes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, (1986).
"Government." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)4, (p)171A (April 1995).
Graeve, Shurie Iftene. Nebraska's Peace, Social Justice, and Environmental Groups. Thesis (Honors)-University
of Nebraska, at Omaha, (1990).
"The Green Mowement for Environmental Justice and a Sustainable Economy." WIN News, (v)18
(n)4, (p)20 (Autumn 1992).
Greenberg, Miriiael R. "Social and Economic Effects of Hazardous Waste Management Sites."
Hazardous Waste, (v)l (p)387 (1984).
. "Tfteoving Environmental Inequity in Siting Locally Unwanted Land Uses." Risk Issues
in Healths Safety, (v)4 (pp)235-252 (Summer 1993).
Greenpeace Irtteinational Waste Trade Campaign, How to Make Your Community a Waste Trade Free
Zone: A
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 22
Grinde, Donald A. and Bruce E. Johansen. Ecocide of Native America: Environmental Destruction
of Indian Lands and People. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers, (1995).
Grossman, Karl. "From Toxic Racism to Environmental Justice." E: The Environmental Magazine,
(v)3 (n)3, (p)28 (May 1992).
. "Environmental Racism." Crisis, (v)98 (n)4, (pp) 14-17 (1991).
Hahn-Baker, David. "Rocky Roads to Consensus." The Amicus Journal, (v)16 (n)l, (p)41 (Spring
1994).
Hair, Jay D. "Providing for Justice as Well as Jobs." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)2, (p)30
(February-March 1993).
. "The Right to a Clean, Safe Environment." National Wildlife, (p)26 (August/September
1991).
Hall, Annabel T. "Testing for Environmental Racism: Prejudice, Profits, Political Power?"
Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, (v)14 (n)l, (pp)107-133 (Winter 1995).
Hamilton, James A. The Influence of Environmental Justice on the Dioxin Controversy. Thesis
(M.S.)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1996).
Hampson, Fen Osier and Judith Reppy. Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, (1996).
Handy, Femida. "Income and Air Quality in Hamilton, Ontario." Alternatives, (v)6 (n)3, (pp)18-24
(1977).
Hare, N. "Black Ecology." The Black Scholar, (v)6 (pp)2-8 (1970).
Harmon, . "Environmental Plight of Reservations Spurs Indians." Atlanta Constitution, 20
May 1992, (p)A3.
Harrington, Sharon Carr. Challenging Race Discrimination in Environmental Law and Policy Making.
(December 1992).
Harris, Cynthia H. and Robert C. Williams. "Research Directions: The Public Health Service
Looks at Hazards to Minorities." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)40-41 (March/April 1992).
Harrison, D. and D.L. Rubinfeld. "The Distribution of Benefits from Improvements in Urban
Air Quality." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, (v)5 (pp)313-32 (1978).
Harrison, D., Jr. Who Pays for Clean Air: The Cost and Benefit Distribution of Automobile
Emission Standards. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, (1975).
Hart, Stacy. "A Survey of Environmental Justice Legislation in the States." Washington University
Law Quarterly, (v)73 (n)3, (p)1459 (Fall 1995).
Hartley, Troy W. "Environmental Justice: An Environmental Civil Rights Value Acceptable to
All World Views." Environmental Ethics, (v)17 (n)3, (p)277 (Fall 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 23
Hasler, L. Claire. "The Proposed Environmental Justice Act: 'I Have a (Green) Dream'." University
of Puget Sound Law Review, (v)17 (n)2, (p)417 (Winter 1994).
Hawkins, Perry Denoa. Environmental Justice: A Statistical Model of Landfill Development
in Mississippi. Thesis (M.A.)-University of Mississippi, (1995).
Hayes, Arthur S. "New Specialty Helps Poor Fight Pollution." Wall Street Journal, 3 October
1991, (p)3.
Head, Gurrero. "Fighting Environmental Racism." New Solutions, (p)38 (Spring 1991).
Hecht, Susanna and Alexander Cockburn. "Land, Trees, and Justice: Defenders of the Amazon."
Nation, (pp)695-701 (May 1989).
Heiderscheit III, John W. "Recent Judicial Developments on Environmental Justice." St. John's
Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)599 (1994).
Heiman, Michael K. "Race, Waste, and Class: New Perspectives on Environmental Justice."
Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)lll (April 1996).
Henderson, Douglas A. "Counsel's Corner: Lender Liability for Environmental Contamination-
Recent Guidance from EPA and Department of Justice." Banking Law Journal, (v)113 (n)9,
(p)918 (October 1996).
Henry, Sarah. "Dumping on the Poor." California Lawyer, (v)15 (n)8, (p)54 (August 1995).
Hernandez, Richard and Edith Sanchez. Cross-Border Links: A Directory of Organizations in
Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Albuquerque, NM: Inter-Hemispheric Education
Resource Center, (1992).
Hernandez, Willie G. "Environmental Justice: Looking Beyond Executive Order No. 12898."
UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, (v)14 (n)l, (p) 181 (1995).
Herrman, Pauline. "Human Environmental Crisis and the Transnational Corporation: The Question
of Culpability." Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, (v)23 (n)2, (pp)285-290
(June 1995).
Hersch, Robert. Race and Industrial Hazards: An Historical Geography of the Pittsburgh Region,
1900 -1990. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 95-18, (1995).
Hester, R. "Participatory Design and Environmental Justice-Pas-de-Deux or Time Change Partners."
Journal of Architectural and Planning Design, (v)4 (n)4, (pp)289-300 (1987).
Higgins, Robert R. "Race and Environmental Equity: An Overview of the Environmental Justice
Issue in the Policy Process." Polity, (v)26 (n)2, (p)281 (Winter 1993).
Hill, David, ed. The Quality of Life in America; Pollution, Poverty, Power, and Fear. New
York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, (1973).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 24
Hill, Kelly M. Environmental Justice: Getting Onto the Public Agenda. Thesis (M. A.)-Colorado
State University, (1996).
Hilts, Phillip. "White House Shuns Key Role on Lead Exposure." New York Times, 24 August
1991.
Hinds, C. "From the Front Lines of the Movement for Environmental Justice." Social Policy,
(v)22 (n)4, (pp) 12-22 (1992).
Hird, John A. "Environmental Policy and Equity: The Case of Superfund." Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, (v)12 (pp)323-343 (1993).
Hoffman, Brent L. "Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Business Friend and Environmental Foe?" Dickinson
Law Review, (v)100 (n)l, (p)211 (Fall 1995).
Holman, Jeremy Thomas. Seeking Environmental Justice: The Environmental Justice Movement
and the Environmental Justice Act of 1993. Internship report (M.S.)-Miami University,
(1995).
Horn, J., ed. SEER Program: Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States: 1973 -
1981. Washington, DC: National Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, (1984).
Howarth, Richard B. "Intergenerational Justice and the Chain of Obligation." Environmental
Values, (v)l (n)2, (p)133 (Summer 1992).
Howell, Frank M. and John K. Thomas. "The Spatial Visualization of Environmental Equity:
Toward an Understanding of Conceptual and Methodological Issues." Annual Meeting of the
Mid-South Sociological Association, Lafayette, LA, (1994).
Howorth, Laura S. "Role of Religion in the Environmental Justice Movement." Proceedings of
the 9th 1995 Conference on Coastal Zone Conference Location: Tampa, EL, USA, (1995).
Human Rights & Environmental Justice. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, (1993).
Hurley, Andrew. Environmental Inequalities: Class, Race, and Industrial Pollution in Gary,
Indiana, 1945-1980. (1995).
. "The Social Biases of Environmental Change in Gary, Indiana, 1945 - 1980." Environmental
Review, (v)12 (n)4, (pp)l-19 (1988).
lake, Robert W. "Volunteers, NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard], and Environmental Justice: Dilemmas
of Democratic Practice." Antipode, (v)28 (n)2, (p)160 (April 1996).
Imam, Jafar and James S. Poles. "Incorporating Environmental Justice Measures During Environmental
Impact Statement Scoping." Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on
High Level Radioactive Waste Management Las Vegas, NV, (1995).
Inconclusive by Design: Waste, Fraud and Abuse in Federal Environmental Health Research.
Boston, MA: National Toxics Campaign, (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 25
"Incorporating Environmental Justice into Environmental Decision Making." National Association
of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and Exposition: Environmental Challenges
- The Next Twenty Years (20th), (1995).
Ingram, Helen. "Managing Transboundary Resources: Lessons from Ambos Nogales." Environment,
(v)36 (n)4, (pp)28-38 (May 1994).
Inhaber, Herbert. "OF LULUs, NIMBYS, and NIMTOOs [Locally Unwanted Land Use, Not In My Back
Yard and Not In My Term Of Office]." Public Interest, (n)107, (p)52 (Spring 1993).
Institute for Southern Studies, "People of Color Forge a Movement for Environmental Justice.
Special Issue." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (Winter 1993).
Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology, Conference [on] Environmental
Crisis-International Justice. St. Louis, MO: The Institute, (April 1972).
"Interview: Fighting for Environmental Justice." Multinational Monitor, (v)17 (n)4, (p)15
(April 1996).
Israel, Brian D. "An Environmental Justice Critique of Risk Assessment." New York University
Environmental Law Journal, (v)3 (n)2, (p)469 (1995).
Jaffe, Susan. "Bhopal in the Backyard? When the Folks Next Door are Industrial Polluters,
It's Time for a Chat." Sierra, (pp)52-53 (September/October 1993).
Jarman, M. Casey. "Environmental Justice, Hawaiian Style." Proceedings of the 9th 1995 Conference
on Coastal Zone Tampa, FL USA, (1995).
Jetter, Alexis. "The Poisoning of a Dream (Environmental Activist Patsy Ruth Oliver)." Vogue,
(v)183 (n)ll, (p)213 (November 1993).
Johnson, Dirk. "Indians' Water Quest Creates a New Foe: Environmentalists." New York Times,
(December 1991).
Johnson, James H. and Melvin L. Oliver. "Blacks and the Toxic Crisis." Western Journal of
Black Studies, (v)13 (n)2, (pp)72-78 (1989).
Johnson, Jennifer L. "Empowerment Lawyering: The Role of Trial Publicity in Environmental
Justice." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23 (n)3, (p)567 (1966).
Johnson, Kirsten. "Publics, Workers, and Parathion: Equity Hazard Management." Environment,
(v)24 (n)9, (pp)28-38 (1982).
Johnson, Pamela E. "Two Steps Forward on Environmental Justice." Environmental Health Perspectives,
(v)102 (n)10, (p)836 (1994).
Johnson, Stephen M. "Federal Regulation of Isolated Wetlands." Environmental Law, (v)23 (n)l,
(P)l (1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 26
Johnson, W.R. "Should the Poor Buy No Growth?" Daedalus, (v)102 (n)4, (pp)165-190 (1973).
Jones, Samaria A. Grassroots Organizing and Environmental Justice: Developing Environmental
Attitudes and Opinions in the African American Community. Thesis (M.A.M.C.)--University
of Florida, (1995).
Jones, Stephen C. "Inequities of Industrial Siting Addressed." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)50, (p)20 (August 1993).
. "EPA Targets Environmental Racism." National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)49, (p)28
(August 1993).
Jordan, Charles. "Diversification, Minorities, and the Mainstream Environmental Movement."
Voices from the Environmental Movement: Perspectives for a New Era, (1992).
"Justice Department is Drawing Fire For Too Few Prosecutions as House Subcommittees Investigate
Suspected Roadblocks." Chemical and Engineering News, (v)70 (n)39, (p)37 (September 1992).
Kain, J.F. "Journey-to-Work as a Determinant of Residential Location." Regional Science Association
Proceedings, (v)9 (pp)137-160 (1962).
Kaminstein, D.S. "Toxic Talk." Social Policy, (v)19 (n)2, (pp)5-10 (1988).
Kanner, Allan. "Environmental Justice, Torts and Causation." Washburn Law Journal, (v)34
(n)3, (p)505 (Summer 1995).
Karliner, Joshua. Toxic Empire: The WMX Corporation, Hazardous Waste, and Global Strategies
for Environmental Justice. San Francisco, CA: Political Ecology Group, (1994).
Kasperson, R.E. and K. Dow. "Developmental and Geographical Equity in Global Environmental
Change: A Framework for Analysis." Evaluation Review, (v)15 (n)l, (pp) 149-171 (1991).
Kasperson, Roger E. "Six Propositions on Public Participation and Their Relevance for Risk
Communication." Risk Analysis, (v)6 (n)3, (pp)275-281 (1986).
Kates, Robert W. and Viola Haarman Kates. "Where the Poor Live?" Environment, (v)34 (n)4,
(pp)4-l 1-25-28 (1992).
Kazis, R. and R.L. Grossman. Fear at Work: Job Blackmail, Job and the Environment. New York,
NY: Pilgrim Press, (1982).
Keck, Margaret E. "Parks, People and Power: The Shifting Terrain of Environmentalism." NACLA
Report on the Americas, (v)28 (n)5, (p)36 (March 1995).
Keeva, Steve. "A Breath of Justice: Along With Equal Employment Opportunity and Voting, Living
Free from Pollution is Emerging as a New Civil Right." ABA Journal, (v)80 (p)88 (February
1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 27
Kelly, Anne L. "Reinvention in the Name of Environmental Justice: A View From State Government."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)769 (Summer 1995).
Kennedy, Daniel B. "Facility Site Selection and Analysis Through Environmental Criminology."
Journal of Criminal Justice, (v)18 (n)3, (p)239 (1990).
Kennedy, Rivera. "Pollution's Chief Victims: The Poor." New York Times, 15 August 1992,
(p)A19.
Kimerling, Judith. "The Environmental Audit of Texaco's Amazon Oil Fields: Environmental
Justice or Business as Usual?" Harvard Human Rights Journal, (v)7 (p)199 (Spring 1994).
Kin, C. Kijang. "Endangering Lives, Contaminating the Environment." Race, Poverty and the
Environment, (v)3 (p)8 (Spring 1992).
Kleinman, Joel C. "Infant Mortality Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups, 1983-1984." Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report, (v)39 (n)SS-3, (pp)31-39 (1990).
Kneese, Allen V. and Blair T. Bower. Environmental Quality Analysis. (1972).
Knickerbocker, . "The Environmentally Disenfranchised." The Christian Science Monitor, (v)84
(p)ll (May 1992).
Koenenn, . "Backyard Battle: Minorities, Environmental Groups Joining to Combat Racism."
Los Angeles Times, 2 January 1992, (p)7E.
Kraft, Michael E. and Denise Scheberle. "Environmental Justice and the Allocation of Risk:
The Case of Lead and Public Health." Policy Studies Journal, (v)23 (n)l, (p) 113 (1995).
Krieg, Eric. "A Socio-Historical Interpretation of Toxic Waste Sites: The Case of Greater
Boston." The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, (v)54 (n)l, (pp)l-14 (1995).
Kruvant, W.J. "People, Energy, and Pollution." The American Energy Consumer, (1975).
Kuehn, Robert R. "The Environmental Justice Implications of Quantitative Risk Assessment."
University of Illinois Law Review, (v)1996 (n)l, (p) 103 (1996).
Kverndokk, Snorre. "Tradable C02 Emission Permits: Initial Distribution as a Justice Problem."
Environmental Values, (v)4 (n)2, (p)129 (May 1995).
Kyte, John R. "Environmental Justice: The Need for Equal Enforcement and Sound Science."
The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, (v)ll (n)l, (p)253 (Fall 1994).
Labalme, Jenny. A Road to Walk: A Struggle for Environmental Justice. Durham, NC: Regulator
Press, (1987).
Laduke, Winona. Environmental and Social Justice. (1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 28
Laituri, Melinda and Andrew Kirby. "Finding Fairness In American's Cities? The Search for
Environmental Equity in Everyday Life." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (p) 121 (Fall
1994).
Lambert, Thomas. A Critique of "Environmental Justice". Washington, DC: National Legal Center
for the Public Interest, (1996).
Lampe, David. "The Politics of Environmental Equity." National Civic Review, (v)81 (n)l,
(p)27 (Winter-Spring 1992).
Land Use Forum, "Environmental Equity: Confronting Racial Injustice in Land Use Patterns."
Land Use Forum, (v)2 (n)l, (Winter 1993).
"The Lands the Feds Forgot." Sierra, (v)74 (pp)44-48 (May/June 1989).
Lavelle, Marianne and Marcia Coyle. "Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental
Law." National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)3, (September 1992).
Lavelle, Marianne. "Minority Activists are Split on Superfund." The National Law Journal,
(v)16 (n)25, (p)3, col 1 (1994).
. "Environmental Racism Targeted; Congressional Hearing." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)26, (p)3 (March 1993).
. "Transition Meets With Minorities: Environmental Activists." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)15, (p)3 (December 1992).
. "EPA Responds to Concerns of Minorities on Cleanups." The National Law Journal,
(v)16 (n)36, (p)A12,coll (1994).
. "Poor Residents Say EPA Hasn't Got the Lead Out; Broken Promises of Regulators
and the NAACP [Nat'l Assoc. for Advancement of Colored People] Litter the Ground Near
a Vacant Foundry." The National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)8, (p)al,col.2 (1994).
. "Discrimination Probe Planned; House Committee to Investigate Environmental Racism."
The National Law Journal, (v)15 (n)4, (p)l, col.2 (1992).
. "Greens and Companies Lose Leader; Did NAACP's [National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People] Ben Chavis Switch Sides, or Work to Bring Opponents Together?" The
National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)l, (p)Al,col.4 (1994).
. "Help Sought from 'Green' Justice Panel." The National Law Journal, (v)17 (n)9,
(p)A16,coll (1994).
. "Residents Want 'Justice,' The EPA Offers 'Equity'." National Law Journal, (v)15
(n)3, (September 1992).
. "EPA Enforcement to be Probed." The National Law Journal, (April 1993).
"Law: Exxon is Indicted for the Alaska Spill." Time, (v)135 (n)ll, (p)54 (March 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 29
Lawless, Paul T. "City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund: Justice Scalia's Evolution
of the Plain Meaning Approach." Northern Kentucky Law Review, (v)22 (n)l, (p) 115 (Winter
1995).
Lazarus, Richard J. "The Reality of Environmental Law in the Prosecution of Environmental
Crimes: A Reply to the Department of Justice." The Georgetown Law Journal, (v)83 (n)7,
(p)1539 (September 1995).
. "Pursuing "Environmental Justice": The Distributional Effects of Environmental
Protection." Northwestern University Law Review, (v)87 (n)3, (p)787 (Spring 1993).
. "The Meaning of Promotion of Environmental Justice." Maryland Journal of Contemporary
Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)l (1993).
. "Distribution in Environmental Justice: Is There a Middle Ground." St. John's
Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)481 (1994).
Lee Kerr, Mary and Charles Lee. "From Conquistadors to Coalitions." Southern Exposure, (v)21
(n)4, (p)8 (Winter 1993).
Lee, Charles. "The Integrity of Justice: Signs of Environmental Racism in Minority and Poor
Communities." Sojourners, (v)19 (n)2, (p)22 (February 1990).
. "Developing Working Definitions of Urban Environmental Justice." Earth Island
Journal, (v)8 (n)4, (p)39 (Fall 1993).
. "Beyond Toxic Wastes and Race." Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from
the Grassroots, (pp)41-52 (1993).
. "Developing the Vision of Environmental Justice: A Paradigm for Achieving Healthy
and Sustainable Communities." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)571
(1995).
. "Toxic Waste and Race in the United States." In Race and the Incidence of Environmental
Hazard: A Time for Disclosure. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai Boulder, CO: Waterview
Press, (1992).
. "From Montgomery to Emelle: The Continuing Struggle Over Disposal of Toxic Wastes."
elsa, (pp)29-33 (October 1984).
Lee, P. "Environmental Justice for Asians and Pacific Islanders." Race, Poverty and the Environment,
(v)3 (Spring 1992).
Legacy of Lead: America's Continual Epidemic of Childhood Lead Poisoning. Washington, DC:
Environmental Defense Fund, (1990).
Levenstein, Charles, Rafael Moure-Eraso and Margeret M. Quinn. "Occupational Health and Environmental
Justice: The Establishment of the Work Environment Justice Fund." New Solutions: A
Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, (v)6 (n)2, (p)84 (Winter 1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 30
Levy, Barry S. "Health and Social Effects of Worldwide Economic Transformation: Focus on
Occupational and Environmental Health." Social Justice, (v)22 (n)4, (p)77 (Winter 1995).
Lewis, Jack. "An Indian Policy at EPA." EPA Journal, (v)12 (pp)23-26 (January/February 1986).
. "The U.S. Colonias: A Target for Aid." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)61-62 (March/April
1992).
Lewis, Victor. "A Message to White Environmentalists." Earth Island Journal, (v)7 (n)4, (p)41
(Fall 1992).
Licenberg, Gary S. "Lowered Intent Requirements in Environmental Crimes Cases: What You Don't
Know Can Hurt You." Criminal Justice, (v)7 (n)2, (p)28 (Summer 1992).
Lincenberg, Gary S. "Hazardous Wastes of Time When the Crime is Environmental." Criminal
Justice, (v)9 (n)l, (p)20 (Spring 1994).
Lindgren, . "Smog Affects Poor, Young Non-White." Los Angeles Times, 21 May 1992, (p)8.
Link, Terry. "Environmental Racism/Environmental Equity: A Bibliography." Green Library
Journal: Environmental Topics in the Information World, (v)2 (n)l, (pp)17-22 (1993).
Livingston, M.L. "Transboundary Environmental Degradation: Market Failure, Power, and Instrumental
Justice." Journal of Economic Issues, (v)23 (n)l, (p)79 (March 1989).
Logan, John R. "Growth, Politics and Stratification of Places." American Journal of Sociology,
(v)84 (pp)404-416 (1978).
Logan, John R. and Harvey L. Molotoch. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press, (1987).
Loibl, G. and P. Kustor. "Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice: 4th Session."
Environmental Policy and Law, (v)25 (n)6, (p)311 (November 1995).
Lopez, . "A Declaration of War by Any Other Means." Harvard Law Review, (v)98 (p)1667 (1985).
Lord, Charles P. "Environmental Justice Law and the Challenge Facing Urban Communities."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)721 (Summer 1995).
Lord, Charles P. and William A. Shutkin. "Environmental Justice and the Use of History."
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)22 (n)l, (1994).
Louisiana Advisory Commitee to the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights., The Battle for Environmental
Justice in Louisiana... Government, Industry, and the People. Kansas City, KS: U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights Regional Office, (September 1993).
Louisiana Department of Environmental Justice, Final Report to the Louisiana Legislature on
Environmental Justice. Baton Rouge, LA: The Department, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 31
Love, Sam. "Ecology and Social Justice: Is There a Conflict?" Environmental Action, (v)4
(pp)3-6 (August 1972).
Lundy-Wade, Eleanor. Black Women's Role in the Struggle for Environmental Justice. Thesis
(M.S.)—University of Wisconsin-Madison, (1993).
Luper-Foy, Steven. "Justice and Natural Resources." Environmental Values, (v)l (n)l, (p)47
(Spring 1992).
Lynch, Barbara Deutsch. "The Garden and the Sea: U.S. Latino Environmental Discourses and
Mainstream Environmentalism." Social Problems, (v)40 (p)108 (February 1993).
Lyskowski, Kevin. "Environmental Justice: A Research Guide." Our Earth Matters, (Spring
1994).
MacLachlan, Claudia. "Tension Underlies Rapport With Grassroots Groups." National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)3, (p)10 (September 1992).
MacLean, Alair. "Bigotry and Poison." Progressive, (v)57 (n)l, (p)14 (January 1993).
Mahaffey, Kathryn R. "National Estimates of Blood Lead Levels: United States, 1976-1980."
New England Journal of Medicine, (v)307 (pp)573-579 (1982).
Maitra, Priyatosh. "Malthus Revisited-Population, Poverty and Pollution." International Journal
of Social Economics, (v)8 (n)3, (pp)47-61 (1981).
Mak, H., et al. "Prevalence of Asthma and Health Service Utilization of Asthmatic Children
in an Inner City." Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, (v)70 (p)5 (1982).
Makhijani, Arjun. From Global Capitalism to Economic Justice: An Inquiry into the Elimination
of Systemic Poverty, Violence, and Environmental Destruction in the World Economy. New
York, NY: Apex Press, (1992).
Mandelker, D.R. Environment and Equity: A Regulatory Challenge. New York, NY: McGraw Hill,
(1981).
Mank, Bradford C. "Environmental Justice and Discriminatory Siting: Risk-Based Representation
and Equitable Compensation." Ohio State Law Journal, (v)56 (n)2, (p)329 (1995).
Mann, Eric. L.A.'s Lethal Air: New Strategies for Policy, Organizing, & Action. Los Angeles,
CA: A Labor/Community Strategy Book, (1991).
Manus, Peter M. "The Owl, the Indian, the Feminist, and the Brother: Environmentalism Encounters
the Social Justice Movements." Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, (v)23
(n)2, (p)249 (Winter 1996).
Marella, Vincent J. "The Department of Justice Prosecutive Guidelines in Environmental Cases
Involving Voluntary Disclosure." The American Criminal Law Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)l 179
(1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 32
Martin, P. Field Duty, U.S. Farmworkers and Pesticide Safety. World Resources Institute Center
for Policy Research, #3, (1985).
Martin, P., R. Mines and A. Diaz. "A Profile of California Farmworkers." California Agriculture,
(v)6 (pp)16-18 (1985).
Martinez, Elizabeth. "Defending the Earth in '92: A People's Challenge to the EPA." Social
Justice, (v)19 (n)2, (p)95 (Summer 1992).
. "When People of Color are an Endangered Species." ZMagazine, (v)4 (pp)61-64
(April 1991).
Mason, Deidre. "New Focus." Environmental Health, (v)103 (n)7, (p)149 (July 1995).
Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc., Massachusetts Environmental Justice Network
Training: Free Continuing Education for Pro Bono Environmental Advocacy. Boston, MA:
MCLE, (1995).
McCallum, M. Recreational and Subsistence Catch and Consumption of Seafood from Three Urban
Industrial Bays ofPuget Sound. Olympia, WA: Washington State Division of Health, (1985).
McCaull, Julian. "Discriminatory Air Pollution: If the Poor Don't Breathe." Environment,
(v)19 (pp)26-32 (March 1976).
McCoy, Charlie. "Scales of Justice: Saltwater Fisheries Law in Florida." Journal of Land
Use & Environmental Law, (v)5 (n)2, (p)613 (1990).
McDermott, J. Charles. "Balancing the Scales of Environmental Justice." The Fordham Urban
Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3, (p)689 (Spring 1994).
McWilliams, Douglas A. "Environmental Justice and Industrial Redevelopment: Economics and
Equality in Urban Revitalization." Ecology Law Quarterly, (v)21 (n)3, (p)705 (1994).
Meeks, Patti A. "Justice Scalia and the Demise of Environmental Law Standing." Journal of
Land Use & Environmental Law, (v)8 (n)2, (p)343 (Spring 1993).
Merchant, Carolyn. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. New York, NY: Routledge,
(1992).
Metzger, Eleanor N. "Driving the Environmental Justice Movement Forward: The Need for a Paternalistic
Approach." Case Western Reserve Law Review, (v)45 (n)l, (p)379 (1994).
Meyer, Art. Earth Keepers: Environmental Perspectives on Hunger, Poverty, and Injustice.
Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press, (1991).
Meyer, Eugene L. "Environmental Racism: Why is it Always Dumped in Our Backyard? Minority
Groups Take a Stand." Audubon, (v)94 (n)l, (p)30 (January/February 1992).
"The Michigan Conference: A Turning Point." In EPA Journal. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul
Mohai (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 33
Minor, Jacqueline. "Environmental Cases in the European Court of Justice: 1991." Journal
of Environmental Law, (v)4 (n)l, (p)159 (1992).
Mitchell, Carolyn M. "Environmental Racism: Race as a Primary Factor in the Selection of
Hazardous Waste Sites." National Black Law Journal, (v)12 (n)3, (pp)176-188 (Winter 1993).
Mohai, Paul and Bunyan Bryant. "Race, Poverty and the Environment: The Disadvantaged Face
Greater Risks." EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp)6-8 (March/April 1992).
. "Environmental Racism: Reviewing the Evidence." Race and the Incidence of Environmental
Hazards: A Time for Discourse, (1992).
. "Race, Poverty, and the Environment." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)6-8 (1992).
Mohai, Paul. "Public Concern and Elite Involvement in Environmental Conservation Issues."
Social Science Quarterly, (v)66 (pp)820-838 (1985).
. "Black Environmentalism." Social Science Quarterly, (v)71 (n)4, (pp)744-765 (1990).
. "The Demographics of Dumping Revisited: Examining the Impact of Alternate Methodologies
in Environmental Justice Research." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)615
(1995).
Montgomery, L.E. and O. Carterpokras. "Health Status by Social Class and or Minority Status
- Implications for Environmental Equity Research." Toxicology and Industrial Health,
(v)9 (n)5, (pp)729-773 (1993).
Moreel, David. "Siting and the Politics of Equity." Hazardous Waste, (v)l (pp)55-59 (1980).
Morgan, Elizabeth S. Environmental Justice and the Robbins Incinerator. Thesis (M.A.)—University
of Illinois at Chicago, (1996).
Morrison, Denton E. and Riley E. Dunlap. "Environmentalism and Elitism: A Conceptual and
Empirical Analysis." Environmental Management, (v)10 (n)5, (pp)581-589 (1986).
Moses, M. "Pesticide-Related Health Problems and Farmworkers." AAOHN Journal, (v)37 (pp)l 15-130
(1989).
. "Environmental Equity and Pesticide Exposure." Toxicology and Industrial Health,
(v)9 (n)5, (pp)913-959 (1993).
Mossop, David. "Justice Statement: A Mixed Bag for Environmental Law." Environmental and
Planning Law Journal, (v)12 (n)4, (p)237 (August 1995).
Nadakavukaren, A. "People Living With Pollution." Greenpeace, (pp)8-13 (October/November/December
1991).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 34
Napton, M. and F. Day. "Polluted Neighborhoods in Texas, Who Lives There?" Environment and
Behavior, (v)24 (n)4, (pp)508-526 (1993).
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer Statistics Review: 1973-1986. Washington, DC: National
Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1989).
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Health of Black and White Americans, 1985-87,
Series 10: Data from the National Health Interview Survey, No. 171. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (January 1990).
National Conference of State Legislatures Environmental Justice Group, Environmental Justice:
A Matter of Perspective. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures, (1995).
National Council of Christ, "The Lumbee River, Lumbee Indians and GSX, Inc." The Egg: National
Journal of Eco-Justice, (pp) 10-11 (Winter 1987).
National Law Journal, "EPA Mulls Civil Rights Law at Hill Hearing." (March 1993).
. Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental Law, (v)15 (n)3, (1992).
Navarro, V. "Race or Class v. Race and Class: Mortality Differentials in the U.S." The Lancet,
(v)336 (pp) 1238-1240 (1989).
Nazaroff, W. and K. Teichman. "Indoor Radon." Environmental Science and Technology, (v)24
(pp)774-782 (1990).
Needleman, H.L. "The Future Challenge of Lead Toxicity." In Advances in Lead Research, Environmental
Health Perspectives. Eds. Lucier and Hook Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, (1990).
Neiman, Max and Ronald O. Loveridge. "Environmentalism and Local Growth Control: A Probe
into the Class Bias Thesis." Environment and Behavior, (v)13 (pp)759-772 (1981).
Nelson, A.C. "Price Effects of Landfills on Residential Land Values." Journal of Urban Planning
and Development, (v)118 (n)9, (pp) 128-137 (1981).
"New Movement Focuses on Minorities." The CQ Researcher, (v)6 (n)32, (p)752 (August 1996).
The New Resistance Southwestern Communities of Color Struggling for Environmental and Economic
Justice. New York, NY: Deep Dish TV, (1992).
Newman, Penny. "A Multi-issue, Multi-ethnic Women's Environmental Justice Movement is Sweeping
the Globe with a Mandate for Change." The Workbook, (v)19 (n)2, (p)93 (Summer 1994).
. "The Grassroots Movement for Environmental Justice: Fighting for Our Lives."
New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, (v)3 (n)4,
(p)87 (Summer 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 35
Newton, David E. Environmental Justice: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO,
(1996).
Nicholson, Mairbel N. and Ralph A. DeMeo. "Air of Equality: An Analysis of Florida's Environmental
Equity and Justice Act." The Florida Bar Journal, (v)68 (n)9, (p)l 12 (October 1994).
Nieves, L.A. and D.R. Wernette. "Minorities and Air Pollution: A Prelimary Geo-Demographic
Analysis." Socioeconomic Research Conference II, (pp)27-28 (June 1991).
. "Breathing Polluted Air: Minorities are Disproportionately Exposed." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (pp)16-17 (March/April 1992).
Nikitas, Margo. "The Silent Bomb: Racism, War, and Toxic Waste." Peoples Weekly World, (v)5
(p)13 (March 1991).
Nixon, Ron. "Environmental Justice." Black Issues in Higher Education, (v)12 (n)25, (p)27
(February 1996).
No, Anne K. "Environmental Justice: Concentration on Education and Public Participation as
an Alternative Solution to Legislation." William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy
Review, (v)20 (n)3, (p)373 (Summer 1996).
Noe, Francis P. and Rob Snow. "Hispanic Cultural Influence on Environmental Concern." Journal
of Environmental Education, (v)21 (n)2, (pp)27-34 (1989).
Nordquist, Joan. Environmental Racism and the Environmental Justice Movement: A Bibliography.
Santa Cruz, CA: Reference and Research Services, (1995).
Norris, R. Pills, Pesticides and Profits: International Trade in Toxic Substances. New York,
NY: North River Press, (1982).
"Not in My Backyard: IR&R [Individual Rights and Responsibilities Section] Joins in Quest
for Environmental Justice: ABA [American Bar Association] House Passes Resolution."
Human Rights, (v)20 (n)4, (p)26 (Fall 1993).
Novotny, Patrick John. "Where We Live, Work and Play: Reframing the Cultural Landscape of
Environmentalism in the Environmental Justice Movement." New Political Science, (v)32
(p)61 (Summer 1995).
. "Organizing for Community Health." The Workbook, (v)19 (n)4, (p)148 (Winter 1994).
. Framing and Political Movements: A Study of Four Cases from the Environmental
Justice Movement. Thesis (Ph.D.)—University of Wisconsin—Madison, (1995).
O'Looney, John. "Framing a Social Market for Community Responsibility: Governing in an Age
of NIMBYs [Not In My Back Yard] and LULUs [Locally Unwanted Land Use]." National Civic
Review, (v)82 (n)l, (p)44 (Winter 1993).
O'Neal, John. "Junebug Environmental Justice Festival." TDR, (v)38 (n)2, (p) 12 (Summer 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 36
Oberly, Jim. "Spearing Fish, Playing 'Chicken': Race and Class Warfare Over Fishing Rights
in Wisconsin." Nation, (v)248 (pp)844-846 (June 1989).
Okie, S. "Study Links Cancer, Poverty." The Washington Post, 17 April 1991.
Olson, Paul A. The Struggle for the Land: Indigenous Insight and Industrial Empire in the
Semiarid World. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, (1990).
Opheim, Teresa. "Profile: Larry Wallace." The Environmental Forum, (v)ll (n)4, (p)28 (July
1994).
Opotow, Susan and Susan Clayton. "Green Justice: Conceptions of Fairness and the Natural
World." Journal of Social Issues, (v)50 (p)l (Fall 1994).
Opotow, Susan. "Predicting Protection: Scope of Justice and the Natural World." Journal
of Social Issues, (v)50 (p)49 (Fall 1994).
Orr, L.L. Income, Employment, and Urban Residential Location. New York, NY: Academic Press,
(1975).
Ostheimer, John M. and Leonard G. Ritt. "Environment, Energy, and Black Americans." Sage
Research Papers in the Social Sciences (Human Ecology Subseries, No. 90-025), (p)38 (1976).
Otway, H. and B. Wynne. "Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox." Risk Analysis, (v)9
(n)2, (pp) 141-145 (1989).
Pardo, Mary. "Creating Community: Mexican American Women in Eastside Los Angeles." A Journal
of Chicano Studies, (v)2022 (n)l-2, (p)39 (Spring-Fall 1991).
Payne, Karen W. and Carlos A. Ugarte. "Office of Minority Health Resource Center: Impact
on Health Related Disparity Among Minority Populations." Health Education, (v)9 (n)2,
(p)608 (1989).
Peace, Environmental, and Social Justice Group Directory. Ithaca, NY: Centerpeace, Center
for Religion, Ethics and Social Policy, (1990).
Pease, W. and R. Morello-Frosch. The Distribution of Air Toxics Emissions in the San Francisco
Bay Area: A Preliminary Environmental Justice Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Berkeley, School of Public Health, Environmental Health Program, (1995).
Penz, G. Peter. "Colonization of Tribal Lands in Indonesia: State Rationales, Rights to Land
and Environmental Justice." Social Action, (v)42 (n)2, (p) 139 (April 1992).
"People of Color Summit Condemns 'Environmental Racism'." National Catholic Reporter, (p)5
(November 1991).
Perez, Nelson. "The Unconstitutionality of Waste Flow Control and the Environmental Justice
Movement's Impact on Incinerators." Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, (v)22
(n)2, (p)587 (1996).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 37
Perfecto, Ivette and Velsquez Baldemar. "Farm Workers: Among the Least Protected." EPA Journal,
(v)18 (n)l, (pp)13-14 (1992).
Perfecto, Ivette. "Pesticide Exposure of Farm Workers and the International Connection."
In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai
(1990).
. "Hazardous Waste and Pesticides: An International Tragedy." In Environmental
Racism: Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Perkins, Jane. "Recognizing and Attacking Environmental Racism." Clearinghouse Review, (v)26
(n)4, (pp)389-397 (1992).
Perlin, Susan A., R. Woodrow Setzer and Ken Sexton. "Distribution of Industrial Air Emissions
by Income and Race in the United States: An Approach Using the Toxic Release Inventory."
Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)l, (p)69 (January 1995).
Perrin, Constance. Everything in its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press, (1992).
Perrolle, Judith A. "Comments for the Special Issue Editor: The Emerging Dialogue on Environmental
Justice." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (p)l (February 1993).
Petrikin, Jonathan S. Environmental Justice. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, (1995).
Picard, Daniel C. '"Fish Consumption' and National Water Quality Criteria." Water Quality
Standards for the 21st Century, (September 1992).
Pickle, L.W., ed. Atlas of the U.S., Cancer Mortality Among Nonwhites: 1950-1980, Table 2.
Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National
Institutes of Health, (1990).
"A Place at the Table: The Mainstream Environmental Movement has Rarely Looked Beyond its
Own White Nose." Sierra, (v)78 (n)3, (p)50 (May 1993).
Poirier, M. "Environmental Justice/Racism/Equity: Can We Talk?" West Virginia Law Review,
(v)96 (n)4, (p)1082 (1995).
Poirier, Marc R. "Environmental Justice and the Beach Access Movements of the 1970s in Connecticut
and New Jersey." Connecticut Law Review, (v)28 (n)3, (p)719 (Spring 1996).
"The Politics of Pollution: Implications for the Black Community." Phylon, (v)41 (n)l, (pp)71-78
(1986).
Pollock, Philip H. and Elliot M. Vittas. "Who Bears the Burdens of Environmental Pollution?
Race, Ethnicity, and Environmental Equity in Florida." Social Science Quarterly, (v)76
(p)294 (June 1995).
Pollock, S. and J. Grozuczak. Reagan, Toxics, and Minorities. Washington, DC: Urban Environment
Conference, Inc., (1984).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 38
Popovic, Neil A.F. "Pursuing Environmental Justice with International Human Rights and State
Constitutions." Stanford Environmental Law Journal, (v)15 (n)2, (p)338 (1996).
Portney, Kent E. "Environmental Justice and Sustainability: Is There a Critical Nexus in
the Case of Waste Disposal or Treatment." The Fordham Urban Law Journal, (v)21 (n)3,
(p)827 (Spring 1994).
. Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities: The Nimby [Not In My Back Yard]
Syndrome. New York, NY: Auburn House, (1991).
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), "...And Justice for All" the Movement for Environmental Justice.
Louisville, KY: Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), (1996).
Proceedings of the 1990 National Minority Health Conference: Focus on Environmental Contamination.
Princeton, NJ: Scientific Publishing Co. Inc., (1990).
Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards.
Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, (1990).
Prout, Linda R. "The Toxic Avengers." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (pp)48-49 (1992).
Puckett, Jim. "Disposing of the Waste-Trade: Closing the Recycling Loophole." The Ecologist,
(v)24 (n)2, (March/April 1994).
Puffer, H. Consumption Rates of Potentially Hazardous Marine Fish Caught in the Metropolitan
Los Angeles Area. (1981).
Pugliese III, Sebastian C. "Environmental Justice: Lower Barriers to Participation." Wisconsin
Imw Review, (v)5 (p)l 177 (1995).
"The Quest for Environmental Equity: Mobilizing African-American Community for Social Change."
Society and Natural Resources, (v)3 (pp)301-311 (October/December 1990).
Raff, Murray. "The Renewed Prominence of Environmental Impact Assessment: A Tale of Two Cities."
Environmental and Planning Law Journal, (v)12 (n)4, (p)241 (August 1995).
Rajagopal, R. Environmental Justice. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, (1995).
Ramirez, Odessa. "The Loss of Native Lands and Economic Black-Mail." Social Justice, (v)19
(n)2, (pp)78-86 (Summer 1992).
Ratcliffe, K.L. "Fusing Civil, Environmental Rights: Hispanic Residents Claim Racism in Protest
Over Plan to Build Incinerator in Their Fertile Valley." Christian Science Monitor, (p)12
(May 1991).
Rauber, Paul. "Unsung Allies: The Greenest Group in Congress is Black." Sierra, (v)79 (n)5,
(p)37 (1994).
Reath, Viki. "EPA to Use Civil Rights Act in Siting Decision." Environment Week, (v)6 (n)36,
(p)l (October 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 39
. "EPA, Commission Investigating Civil Rights Allegations." Environment Week, (v)6
(n)40, (p)l (October 1993).
. "EPA to Probe Texas Environmental Justice Complaint." Environment Week, (v)7
(n)14, (p)l (April 1994).
Rees, J. "Equity and Environmental Policy." Geography, (v)76 (pp)292-303 (1991).
Rees, Matthew. "Black and Green: Race and Environmentalism." The New Republic, (v)206 (n)9,
(pp)15-16 (March 1992).
Regan, Richard. Environmental Racism: An Annotated Bibliography. Washington, DC: Center
for Policy Alternatives, (1993).
Reich, Peter L. "Greening the Ghetto: A Theory of Environmental Race Discrimination." The
University of Kansas Law Review, (v)41 (n)2, (pp)271-314 (Winter 1992).
Reilly, William K. "EPA's Reilly Replies to 'Unequal Protection'." The National Law Journal,
(v)15 (n)21, (p)16 (1993).
Residential Apartheid: The American Legacy. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Afro-American
Studies Publications, (1994).
Resolondraibe, Peri. "Environmental Concern and Economic Justice." World & World, (v)ll (n)2,
(p)147 (Spring 1991).
Robinson, W.P. "Uranium Production and its Effects on Navajo Communities Along the Rio Puerco
in Western New Mexico." In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds.
Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1990).
Rodgers, John Herrick. Collaborating Across Many Divides: Environmental Justice Groups and
the Mainstream Nationals. Thesis (M.A.)-University of California, Santa Barbara, (1995).
"Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring Environmental Justice." Risk Analysis, (v)16 (n)4,
(pp)517-526 (August 1996).
Rolednak, A.P. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Disease. London: Oxford UP, (1989).
Roman, . '"Environmental Racism' Rankles." The Washington Times, 25 June 1992, (p)Al.
Rosen, Sanford Jay. "Seeking Environmental Justice for Minorities and Poor People." Trial,
(v)30 (n)12, (p)50 (1994).
Ross, Heather E. "Using NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] in the Fight for Environmental
Justice." William and Mary Journal of Environmental Law, (v)18 (n)2, (p)353 (Spring 1994).
Ruben, Barbara and Joseph Smith. "Jaundiced Justice: The Nation's Largest Waste Company Claims
It Wants to Help Facilitate a Dialogue on Environmental Justice, But Grassroots Activists
Question Its Motives." Environmental Action Magazine, (v)26 (p)31 (Fall 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 40
Ruben, Barbara. "Grave Reservations: Waste Company Proposals Targeting Native American Lands
are Meeting with a Growing Pattern of Resistance." Environmental Action, (v)23 (n)l,
(pp) 12-15 (1991).
Ruffins, Paul. "Mixing a Few More Colors into the Green." In Context, (v)25 (p)33 (1990).
. "Environmental Commitment as if People Didn't Matter." In Environmental Racism:
Issues and Dilemmas. Eds. Bunyan Bryant and Paul Mohai (1991).
Russell, Dick. "Environmental Racism: Minority Communities and Their Battle Against Toxics."
Amicus Journal, (v)ll (pp)22-32 (Spring 1989).
Sachs, Aaron. "Upholding Human Rights and Environmental Justice." The Humanist, (v)56 (n)2,
(p)5 (March 1996).
. Eco-Justice: Linking Human Rights and the Environment, Worldwatch Paper No. 127.
Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, (1995).
"Upholding Human Rights and Environmental Justice." In State of the World. Ed.
L.R. Brown Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute, (1996).
Salazar, Debra J. Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activists Push the Frontiers of Forestry
and Politics. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University, (1996).
Sandman, P.M. "Getting to Maybe: Some Communication Aspects of Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities."
Seton Hall Legislative Journal, (v)9 (pp)437-465 (1985).
. "Poisoning the Border." U.S. News and World Report, (p)37 (May 1992).
Sands, Philippe. "European Community Environmental Law: Legislation, the European Court of
Justice and Common-Interest Groups." The Modern Law Review, (v)53 (n)5, (p)685 (September
1990).
Sarangi, Satinath. "Bhopal Disaster: Judiciary's Failure - Satinath Sarangi." Economic and
Political Weekly, (v)30 (n)46, (p)2907 (November 1995).
Sarokin, David J. Environmental Justice: Co-Evolution of Environmental Concerns and Social
Justice. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, (1994).
. "Environmental Justice: Co-Evolution of Environmental Concerns and Social Justice."
Environmentalist, (v)14 (n)2, (p) 121 (1994).
Satchell, Michael. "A Whiff of Discrimination? Racism and Environmental Policy." U.S.News
& World Report, (v)112 (n)17, (p)34 (May 1992).
Savage, E.P. National Study to Determine Levels of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Insecticides in
Human Milk. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, (1976).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 41
Savage, J.A. and Steve Stallone. "Breathing Fire: White Middle-Class Richmond Residents are
Finally Joining Poor Blacks and Latinos in Their Decades-Old Battle Against Chevron's
Pollution." San Francisco Bay Guardian (East Bay ed.), (v)26 (n)23, (1992).
Schaffer, Gwen. "Asian Americans Organize for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)25 (n)4,
(p)30 (Winter 1994).
Schemmel, Mathew L. and Bas de Regt. "The European Court of Justice and the Environmental
Protection Policy of the European Community." Boston College International and Comparative
Law, (v)17 (n)l, (p)53 (Winter 1994).
Schleifstein, . "Minister Focuses on Ecology." New Orleans Times Picayne, 27 March 1992,
(p)B8.
Schlossberg, M. Evaluating Environmental Inequity Using GIS and 1990 US Census Data: A Study
of Silicon Valley. San Jose, CA: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, San Jose
State University, (1995).
Schneider, Keith. "A Valley of Death for the Navajo Uranium Miners." New York Times, 3 May
1992.
. "Minorities Join to Fight Polluting of Neighborhoods." New York Times, 25 October
1991.
Schneider, Paul. "Respect for the Earth: The Environmentalism of Chief Oren Lyons Stems From
His Iroquois Heritage." Audubon, (v)96 (n)2, (p)110 (March-April 1994).
Schueler, Donald G. "Southern Exposure." Sierra, (pp)42-49 (November/December 1992).
Schwab, Jim. Deeper Shades of Green: The Rise of Blue-Collar and Minority Environmentalism
in America. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Press, (1994).
Schwartz, Adam D. "The Law of Environmental Justice: A Research Pathfinder." Environmental
Law Reporter, (v)25 (n)10, (p)10543 (1995).
. "Environmental Justice: A Survey of the Ailments of Environmental Racism." Howard
Scroll: The Social Justice Review, (v)2 (n)2, (p)35 (Summer 1994).
Schwartz, J. "Predictors of Asthma and Persistent Wheeze in a National Sample of Children
in the United States." American Review of Respiratory Disease, (p)142 (1990).
Schwarzman, Mat. "Drawing the Line at Place: The Environmental Justice Project." High Performance,
(v)19 (n)2, (p)8 (Summer 1996).
Scott, William C. "Environmental Justice: A New Era of Community Empowerment, Political Activism,
and Civil Rights Litigation." Environmental Claims Journal, (v)7 (n)l, (p)5 (1994).
Seckinger, Cristina. "Evaluating the Real Environmental Health and Social Justice Status of
Your Community." Family and Community Health, (v)17 (n)2, (p)64 (July 1994).
"Seeking 'Environmental Justice'." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, (v)51 (n)34, (p)2257
(August 1993).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 42
Seidman, Ethan. "What Color is Green?" Garbage, (v)4 (n)4, (p)14 (1992).
Seigler, Jane. "Environmental Justice: An Industry Perspective." Maryland Journal of Contemporary
Legal Issues, (v)5 (n)l, (p)59 (1993).
Selcraig, Bruce. "Border Patrol." Sierra, (v)79 (n)3, (p)58 (May-June 1994).
Seley, J.E. and J. Wolpert. "Equity and Location." In Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste
Management. Eds. Oelgeschlager and Gunn and Hain (1983).
"Setting Environmental Justice in Space and Place: Acute and Chronic Airborne Toxic Releases
in the Southeastern United States." Urban Geography, (v)17 (n)5, (p)380 (July 1996).
Settles, Trish, Jason Webb and Antonio Alves. "Environmental Justice Law and the Challenges
Facing Urban Communities." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)735 (Summer
1995).
Sevrens, Gail. Environmental, Health, and Housing Needs and Non-Profit Groups in the U.S.
-Mexico Border Area. Arlington, VA: World Environment Center, (June 1992).
Sexton, Ken and Yolanda Banks Anderson. "Equity in Environmental Health: Research Issues
and Needs." Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (September-October 1993).
Sexton, Ken, Kenneth Ilden and B.L. Johnson. "Environmental Justice: The Central Role of
Research in Establishing a Credible Scientific Foundation." Toxicology and Industrial
Health, (v)9 (n)5, (p)685 (1993).
Sexton, Ken. "Environmental Justice: Are Pollution Risks Higher for Disadvantaged Communities?"
Health Environmental Digest, (v)9 (n)9, (p)73 (1996).
Shaffer, Gwen. "Asian Americans Organize for Justice." Environmental Action, (v)25 (n)4,
(p)30 (Winter 1994).
Shaikh, R.A., ed. Variations in Susceptibility to Inhaled Pollutants. Baltimore, MD: John
Hopkins University Press, (1988).
Shelton, B.A. Growth and Decline of Sunbelt Boomtown. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University
Press,.
Sheridan, Patrick. "Minorities, Low-Income Groups Most at Risk." Waste Technical News, (August
1992).
Shields, G. "Implementing the Executive Order of Environmental Justice at the U.S. Department
of Energy." National Association of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference and
Exposition: Environmental Challenges-The Next Twenty Years (20th), (June 1995).
Shutkin, William A. "The Concept of Environmental Justice and a Reconception of Democracy."
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4, (p)579 (Summer 1995).
Shutkin, William A. and Charles P. Lord. "Environmental Law, Environmental Justice, and Democracy."
West Virginia Law Review, (v)96 (pp) 117-1132 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 43
Sidawi, Steve. "The Historical Roots of Environmental Inequalities in a Planned Industrial
Suburb." Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago, Illinois,
(1995).
Siemens, Reynold. "Environmental Justice: The New Wave." Virginia Environmental Law Journal,
(v)14 (n)4, (p)567 (Summer 1995).
Sierra Roundtable on Race, Justice, and the Environment, "A Place at the Table." Sierra, (pp)51-58,-90-91
(May/June 1993).
Silver, K. "Minorities and Toxics." Exposure, (pp)36-37 (January/February 1984).
Singer, Brent. "An Extension of Rawls' Theory of Justice to Environmental Ethics." Environmental
Ethics, (v)10 (n)3, (p)217 (Fall 1988).
Situ, Yingyi and David Emmons. "Teaching Environmental Crime in a Criminal Justice Curriculum."
Journal of Criminal Justice Education: JCJE, (v)7 (n)l, (p)147 (Spring 1996).
Slavin, J.P. "Environmental Nightmare Turns Haitian City Into Toxic Dust Bowl." National
Catholic Reporter, (v)27 (p) 12 (September 1991).
Sly, Peter W. "EPA and Indian Reservations." Environmental Law Reporter, (v)20 (pp)10429-10437
(October 1990).
Small, Gail. "War Stories: Environmental Justice in Indian Country." The Amicus Journal,
(v)16 (n)l, (p)38 (Spring 1994).
Smith, Beverly McQueary. "Ethics, The Legacy of the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr.
and the Movement Toward Environmental Justice." Environmental Law Journal, (v)l (n)l,
(p)l (Fall 1994).
Snow, Donald. Inside the Environment Movement: Meeting the Leadership Challenge. Washington,
DC: Island Press, (1992).
Snow, Katrin. "Tribes' Activism Poses Hazard to Waste Industry's Health." National Catholic
Reporter, (v)28 (pp) 13-14 (December 1991).
The Social Burdens of Environmental Pollution: A Comparative Metropolitan Data Source. Cambridge,
MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., (1977).
"Society." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)l, (p)22A (January 1995).
"Society." Environmental Science & Technology, (v)29 (n)7, (p)309A (July 1995).
Solnit, Rebecca. Savage Dreams: A Journey into the Hidden Wars of the American West. San
Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, (1994).
Somsen, Hans. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)4 (n)8, (p)244 (August 1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 44
"European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)5 (n)3, (p)93 (March 1996).
"European Court of Justice: Case Reports." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)5 (n)7, (p)215 (July 1996).
_. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental Law Review,
(v)4 (n)10, (p)276 (October 1995).
Southwest Organizing Project, Intel Inside New Mexico: A Case Study of Environmental and Economic
Injustice. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Organizing Project, (1995).
. Intel Inside...New Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Organizing Project, (1983).
Southwest Research and Information Center, The Workbook. Albuquerque, NM: Southwest Research
and Information Center, (1991).
Spears, Ellen. "Freedom Buses Roll Along Cancer Alley." Southern Changes, {v) 15 (n)l, (Spring
1993).
"Special Issue on Environmental Justice." Social Problems, (v)40 (n)l, (February 1993).
"Special Issue. Latinos and the Environment." Race, Poverty & the Environment, (v)4 (n)3,
(Fall 1994).
Spillmann, Andreas. "Social Justice and Environmental Policy." International Journal of Social
Economics, (v)22 (n)3, (p)3 (1995).
Sprokkereef, Annemarie. "European Court of Justice: Case Report." European Environmental
Law Review, (v)5 (n)l, (p)23 (January 1996).
Stafford, H.A. "Environmental Protection and Industrial Location." Annals of the Association
of American Geographers, (v)75 (n)2, (pp)227-240 (1985).
Starkey, Deb. "Environmental Justice Win, Lose or Draw." State Legislatures, (v)20 (n)3,
(p)27 (March 1994).
Starr, Judson W. "Turbulent Times at Justice and EPA: The Origins of Environmental Criminal
Prosecutions and the Work that Remains." The George Washington Law Review, (v)59 (n)4,
(p)900 (April 1991).
The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance. Boston, MA: South End
Press, (1992).
Stein, Eleanor. "Environmental Section Forms a New Committee on Environmental Justice." New
York State Bar Journal, (v)66 (n)2, (p)34 (February 1994).
Steinberg, Michael W. and Tim A. Pohle. "Environmental Justice and RCRA [Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act] Pemits: Nothing Is Quite What It Seems." Environment Reporter, (v)26
(n)22, (p)1025 (1995).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 45
Steinhart, Peter. "What Can We Do About Environmental Racism? Coping With Tendency to Build
Freeways, Prisons and Waste Facilities in Poor and Minority Communities." Audubon, (v)93
(n)3, (p)18 (May 1991).
Stonich, Susan C. "The Environmental Quality and Social Justice Implications of Shrimp Mariculture
Development in Honduras." Human Ecology, (v)23 (n)2, (p)143 (June 1995).
"Strategic Elements for Environmental Justice." Environmental Health Perspectives: ehp, (v)103
(n)9, (p)796 (September 1995).
Strategic Plan for the Elimiantion of Childhood Lead Poisoning. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease
Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1991).
Straw, Lawrence J., Jr. and Straw & Gilmartin. "Environmental Justice: Racial Gerrymandering
for Environmental Siting Decisions." Virginia Environmental Law Journal, (v)14 (n)4,
(p)665 (1995).
Street, Richard. "Battling Toxic Racism: El Pueblo Para El Aire y Agua Limpio." Organizing
for Our Lives: New Voices from Rural Communities, (1992).
Streeter, Calvin L. and Jacqueline Gonsalvez. "Social Justice Issues and the Environmental
Movement in America: A New Challenge for Social Workers." The Journal of Applied Social
Sciences, (v)18 (n)2, (p)209 (Spring 1994).
Suagee, Dean B. "Turtle's War Party: An Indian Allegory on Environmental Justice." Journal
of Environmental Law and Litigation, (v)9 (n)2, (p)461 (1994).
Suro, Roberto. "Pollution-Weary Minorities Try Civil Rights Tack." New York Times, (p)Al
(January 1993).
Swanson, Sandra. "Can We Balance the Scales of Environmental Justice?" Safety & Health:
SH, (v)152 (n)4, (p)76 (October 1995).
Swanston, Samara F. "An Environmental Justice Perspective on Superfund Reathorization." St.
John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)565 (1994).
Szasz, Andrew. EcoPopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis,
MN: University of Minnesota Press, (1994).
. "Demographics of Proximity to Toxic Pollution: The Case of Los Angeles County."
(1993).
Taibi, Anthony D. "Environmental Justice, Structural Economic Theory, and Community Economic
Empowerment." St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)491 (1994).
Taliman, Valerie. "Saving Native Lands: One Woman's Crusade Against Environmental Racism."
Ms. Magazine, (v)4 (n)4, (p)28 (January/February 1994).
. "The Toxic Waste of Indian Lives." Covert Action, (v)40 (pp)16-19 (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 46
. "Toxic Waste Dumping in the Third World." Race and Class, (v)30 (n)3, (pp)47-56
(1989).
. "Stuck Holding the Nation's Nuclear Waste." Race, Poverty & the Environment,
(p)6 (Fall 1992).
Tarshis, Lauren. "Dumping on Minorities." Scholastic Update, (p) 16 (April 1992).
Taylor, Dorceta E. "Blacks and the Environment: Towards an Explanation of the Concern and
Action Gap Between Blacks and Whites." Environment and Behavior, (v)21 (n)2, (pp) 175-205
(1989).
. "The Environmental Justice Movement." EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (p)23 (January
1992).
Tesh, Sylvia N. and Bruce A. Williams. "Identity Politics, Disinterested Politics, and Environmental
Justice." Polity, (v)28 (n)3, (p)285 (Spring 1996).
Texas Environmental Equity and Justice Task Force, Recommendations of the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission. Austin, TX: Texas Network for Environmental Equity and Justice
Task Force, (August 1993).
Texas Network for Environmental and Economic Justice, Toxics in Texas & Their Impact on Communities
of Color. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Policy Studies, (March 1993).
The Environmental Law Institute, The Environmental Lawyer/The Environmental Justice. Washington,
DC: The Institute, (1993).
The National Law Journal, "Special Issue on Environmental Equity." The National Law Journal,
(September 1992).
Thigpen, David. "The Playground That Became a Battleground. (Kingsley Park Playground of
Buffalo, New York's Arsenic Contaminated Soil)." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)2, (p)14
(February/March 1993).
. "Peggy Shepard: Environmental Justice for All." National Wildlife, (v)31 (n)6,
(p)44 (1993).
Thomas, John K. and Frank M. Howell. "Environmental Justice: Empirical Evidence and Conceptual
Prospects." Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association in Dallas, TX,
(March 1995).
"To Forge a Movement." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)30 (Winter 1993).
Tolba, Mostafa Kamal. "Global Environmental Justice." The International Journal of Humanities
and Peace, (v)9 (n)l, (p)78 (Spring 1992).
. Global Environmental Justice. Nairobi: Information and Public Affairs, UNEP,
(1990).
Tomsho, Robert. "Dumping Grounds: Indian Tribes Contend With Some of Worst of American's
Pollution." Wall Street Journal, 29 November 1990.
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 47
Torres, Gerald. "Keynote Address: Changing the Way Government Views Environmental Justice."
St. John's Journal of Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)543 (1994).
. "Environmental Burdens and Democratic Justice." The Fordham Urban Law Journal,
(v)21 (n)3, (p)431 (Spring 1994).
. "Environmental Justice: The Legal Meaning of a Social Movement." The Journal
of Law and Commerce, (v)15 (n)2, (p)597 (Spring 1996).
. "Class, Race and Environmental Regulation, Introduction: Understanding Environmental
Racism." University of Colorado Law Review, (v)63 (n)4, (p)839.
Toxic Struggles: The Theory and Practice of Environmental Justice. Philadelphia, PA: New
Society Publishers, (1993).
"Toxic Struggles." Southern Exposure, (v)21 (n)4, (p)22 (Winter 1993).
"Toxic Waste and the African American Community." Urban League Review, (v)13 (pp)67-75 (Summer/Winter
1989).
Transportation, Environmental Justice, and Social Equity. Conference Proceedings. Held in
Chicago, Illinois on November 16-18. (July 1995).
Trask, M. "Native Hawaiian Historical and Cultural Perspectives on Environmenal Justice."
Race, Poverty and the Environment, (v)3 (n)2, (1992).
Truax, Hawley. "Beyond White Environmentalism: Minorities and the Environment." Environmental
Action, (v)21 (pp)9-30 (1990).
. "Untold Suffering." Environmental Action, (v)24 (n)3, (pp)14-17 (1992).
. "Environmental Justice for All." Environmental Action, (pp)5-6 (November/December
1991).
Tsao, Naikang. "Ameliorating Environmental Racism: A Citizens' Guide to Combatting the Discriminatory
Siting of Toxic Waste Dumps." New York University Law Review, (v)67 (n)2, (pp)366-418
(May 1992).
Tyson, Rae. "Target of Toxins? Poor Communities Charge 'Environmental Racism'." USA Today,
24 October 1991.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Louisiana Advisory Committee, The Battle for Environmental
Justice in Louisiana: Government, Industry, and the People. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana
Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, (1993).
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Civil
and Constitutional Rights, Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, (1994).
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives, Environmental Issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, (1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 48
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Environmental Justice: Proposed Implementation Strategy.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Defense, Proposed Strategy for Environmental Justice. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (January 1995).
U.S. Department of Energy, Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign
Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel: Appendix A. (March 1995).
. U.S. Department of Energy Proposed Environmental Justice Strategy: Executive
Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, (1994).
U.S. Department of Energy. Idaho Operations Office, Final Environmental Impact Statement:
Volume 1, Appendix L, Environmental Justice. (April 1995).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Healthy People 2000, National Health Promotion
and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, (1990).
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Elements for Environmental Justice.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (January 1995).
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Achieving Environmental Justice: A Draft
Departmental Strategy. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Justice Guidance Concerning Environmental Justice.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
U.S. Department of Justice. Environment and National Resources Division, Environmental Justice:
A Bibliography. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Management Division, (1995).
U.S. Department of the Interior, Department of the Interior Strategic Plan: Environmental
Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Justice In the Matter of the
Fifth Meeting of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council." The Administrative
Law Journal of the American University, (v)9 (n)3, (p)623 (Fall 1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Tribes at Risk: Wisconsin Tribes Comparative Risk Project.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (October 1992).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, OSWER Environmental
Justice Task Force Draft Final Report: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (April 1994).
. "Environmental Protection: Has It Been Fair?" EPA Journal, (v)18 (n)l, (March/April
1992).
. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (September 1990).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 49
. Air Pollution and Health Risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1991).
. EPA's Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1990).
. Methodology for Estimating Population Exposure from the Consumption of Chemically
Contaminated Fish. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. EPA's Environmental Justice Strategy: Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (April 1995).
. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1987).
. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(February 1994).
. Air Pollution and the Public: A Risk Communication Guide for State and Local
Agencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. Environmental Equity: Reducing Risk For All Communities. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (1992).
. Symposium on Health Research and Needs to Ensure Environmental Justice: Recommendations.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1994).
. EPA Journal. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,.
. Toxics in the Community: National and Local Perspectives. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (1991).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Task Force Draft Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, (April 1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Administration and Resources Management, Environmental
Justice: 1994 Annual Report: Focusing on Environmental Protection for All People. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
. Environmental Justice Initiatives 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (February 1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS),
Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Nitrogen Oxides: Assessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1982).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides: Assessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1982).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 50
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide: Reassessment
of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1984).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Assessment of
Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1988).
. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter:
Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (1982).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Integration
of Environmental Justice into OSWER Policy, Guidance, and Regulatory Development. Washington,
DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (September 1994).
. Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report. Executive Summary.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (May 1995).
. Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report. Washington, DC:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (May 1995).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. Factsheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (1995).
. OSWER Environmental Justice Action Agenda. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, (May 1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Environmental Equity, Environmental Justice
Initiatives 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1994).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Environmental Justice, Environmental Justice
Strategy: Executive Order 12898. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
(1995).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Environmental
Equity: Reducing Risk for All Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, (1992).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Toxic Release
Inventory & Emission Reductions 1987-1990 in the Lower Mississippi River Industrial Corridor.
Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1993).
U.S. Federal Transit Administration. Office of Policy Development, Transportation—Environmental
Justice and Social Equity Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, (1995).
U.S. General Accounting Office, Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with
Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. General
Accounting Office, (1983).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 51
. Hazardous and Nonhazardous Waste: Demographics of People Living Near Waste Facilities.
Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, (1995).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Draft Strategic Plan: Environmental
Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (1995).
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice Response to the Proposed EPA Worker Protection
Standards for Agricultural Workers, (1988).
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, Proceedings: The First National People
of Color Environmental Leadership Summit. New York, NY: Commission for Racial Justice,
(1992).
United Church of Christ. Commission for Racial Justice, Toxic Wastes and Race in the United
States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristics of Communities
with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York, NY: Public Data Access. Inc., (1987).
University of Colorado Law Review, Natural Resource Issue: Race, Class and Environmental Regulation,
(1992).
Urban Environmental Conference, Inc., Taking Back Our Health, An Institute on Surviving the
Toxics Threat to Minority Communities. (1985).
"Using the National Environmental Policy Act to Address Environmental Justice Issues." Clearinghouse
Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)436 (1995).
Valdivia, Enrique. "How Legal Services Clients Become Neighborhood Activists: Three Tales
of Texas Environmental Justice." Clearinghouse Review, (v)29 (n)4, (p)418 (1995).
Valencia-Ospina, E. "The International Court of Justice and International Environmental Law."
Asian Yearbook of International Law, (v)2 (p)l (1992).
Vallette, J. The International Trade in Wastes: A Greenpeace Inventory. Washington, DC:
Greenpeace, (1989).
Vasquez, Xc. "The North American Free Trade Agreement and Environmental Racism." Harvard
International Law Journal, (v)34 (pp)357-379 (Spring 1993).
Vaughan, Elaine and Brenda Nordenstam. "The Perception of Environmental Risks Among Ethnically
Diverse Groups." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, (v)22 (n)l, (pp)29-60 (1991).
Villarosa, Linda. "Showdown at Sunrise." Essence, (pp)55-59 (July 1991).
Wagener, DK. "Equity in Environmental Health - Data Collection and Interpretation Issues."
Toxicology and Industrial Health, (v)9 (n)5, (pp)775-795 (1994).
Waldman, Steven. "Lead and Your Kids." Newsweek, (pp)42-48 (July 1991).
Ward, Bud. "Environmental Racism Becomes Key Clinton EPA Focus." Safety & Health, (v)149
(n)3, (p) 183 (March 1994).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 52
Wardzinski, Karen M. "Environmental Justice: What Does It Mean for the NPDES [National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System] Permit Program?" Environmental Regulation and Permitting,
(v)5 (n)2, (p)93 (Winter 1995).
Warrior, . "Dancing With Wastes." Christianity and Crisis, (v)51 (pp)216-218 (July 1991).
Washington Toxics Coalition, "Toxic Waste and Race." Alternatives, (v)9 (n)2, (p)5 (1990).
Wassertrom, R.F. and R. Wiles. Field Duty: U.S. Farm Workers and Pesticide Safety. Washington,
DC: World Resources Institute, (1985).
Waxman, Henry A. The Real Story Behind EPA's Environmental Equity Report: An Evaluation of
Internal EPA Memoranda. (1992).
. "Lead Poisoning a Threat to the Health of Our Kids." USA Today, 30 July 1991,
(P)9A.
Weaver, Jace. Defending Mother Earth: Native American Perspectives on Environmental Justice.
Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, (1996).
Webster, Donovan. "Sweet Home Arkansas." Utne Reader, (v)52 (pp)l 12-116 (July/August 1992).
Weinberg, B. "Toxic Racism Dumps on Low-Income Communities." Guardian, (v)43 (p)7,9 (August
1991).
Weinberg, Philip. "Environmental Protection in the Next Decades: Moving From Clean Up to
Prevention." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, (v)27 (n)3, (p) 1145 (April 1994).
Weintraub, Bernard A. "Environmental Security, Environmental Management, and Environmental
Justice." Pace Environmental Law Review, (v)12 (n)2, (p)533 (Spring 1995).
Weisskopf, Michael. "Minorities Pollution Risk is Debated: Some Activists Link Exposure to
Racism." Washington Post, (p)A25 (January 1992).
. "Strategy on Lead Turns Out Not to be Blitzkrieg." The Washington Post, 25 October
1991, (p)A25.
. "EPA's Two Voices on Pollution Risks to Minorities." The Washington Post, 9 March
1992, (p)A15.
Wells, Malcolm. "A Jigsaw Puzzle: Racism, Environmentalism and the Social Conscience of an
Architect." Whole Earth Review, (v)62 (pp)22-25 (Spring 1989).
Wenz, Peter S. Environmental Justice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, (1988).
Wernette, D. Minorities, Age Groups, and Substandard Air Quality Areas: An Analysis of Regional
and Urban Patterns. Argonne, IL: Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Division
Argonne National Laboratory, (1992).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 53
West, Patrick C. "Minority Anglers and Toxic Fish Consumption: Evidence of the State-Wide
Survey of Michigan." In The Proceedings of the Michigan Conference on Race. Eds. Bunyan
Bryant and Paul Mohai (1989).
. "Health Concerns for Fish-Eating Tribes?" EPA Journal, (v)18 (pp) 15-16 (March/April
1992).
Westbrooks, Aricka Marie. Wyandotte County, Kansas: A Study of Hazardous Waste and Environmental
Justice. Thesis (M.S.)--lowa State University, (1994).
Wheeler, David L. "When the Poor Face Environmental Risks." Chronicle of Higher Education,
(v)40 (n)25, (p)A10 (February 1994).
White, J.M. "Distributive Justice and Environmental Ethics at Yucca Mountain: Another View."
The International Journal of Environmental Studies, (v)38 (n)2, (p)103 (1991).
Who Pays the Price? The Sociocultural Context of Environmental Crisis. Washington, DC: Island
Press, (1994).
Wigley, Daniel C. and Kristin Shrader-Frechette. "Environmental Justice: A Louisiana Case
Study." Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, (v)9 (n)l, (pp)61-82 (1996).
Wilk, V.A. "The EPA Proposed Worker Protection Regulations - A Critique." Migrant Health
Clinical Supplement of the National Migrant Referral Project, Inc., (1988).
Wilkinson, C.H. "New Approach for Environmental Justice Impact Assessment." Annual Conference
of the National Association of Environmental Professionals: Practical Environmental Directions
- A Changing Agenda, (March 1996).
Williams, Guy O. "A Personal Commitment to Environmental Justice." St. John's Journal of
Legal Commentary, (v)9 (n)2, (p)585 (1994).
Williams, Serena M. "The Anticipatory Nuisance Doctrine: One Common Law Theory for Use in
Environmental Justice Cases." William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, (v)19
(n)2, (p)223 (Spring 1995).
Williard, W. "Environmental Racism: The Merging of Civil Rights and Environmental Activism."
Southern University Law Review, (v)31 (Fall 1992/Spring 1993).
Willoh, Don and Tom Collins. "Environmental Justice and TSD [Treatment, Storage and Disposal]
Siting Policies: Title VI is the Plaintiffs' Newest and Best Weapon, But Will It Succeed."
Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, (v)3 (n)2, (p)78 (1996).
Wink, Walter. "Ecobible: The Bible and Ecojustice." Tlieology Today, (v)49 (n)4, (p)465 (1993).
Wisner, Ben. "The Reconstruction of Environmental Rights in Urban South Africa." Human Ecology:
An Interdisciplinary Journal, (v)23 (n)2, (pp)259-288 (1995).
Wissow, L.S. "Poverty, Race, and Hospitalization for Childhood Asthma." American Journal
of Public Health, (v)78 (p)7 (July).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
EJ Bibliography
EPA Office of Environmental Justice
Page 54
Wiygul, Robert B., Sharon Carr Harrington and Florence T. Robinson. "Environmental Justice
in Rural Communities." West Virginia Law Review, (v)96 (n)2, (p)405 (Winter 1993).
Wolpert, Julian. "Regressive Siting of Public Facilities." Natural Resources Journal, (v)16
(p)103 (1976).
Women and the Environment: Crisis and Development in the Third World. New York, NY: Monthly
Review Press, (1991).
"Women's Environment & Development Organization - WEDO (Women and Environment)." WIN News,
(v)18 (n)4, (Autumn 1992).
Wong, O. and W.J. Bailey. "Cancer Incidence and Community Exposure to Air Emissions from Petroleum
and Chemical Plants in Contra Costa County, California: A Critical Epidemiological Assessment."
Journal of Environmental Health, (v)56 (n)5, (pp) 11-17 (1993).
"World Womens' Congress for a Healthy Planet: The North American Women's Regional Caucus Report."
Women & Environment, (v)13 (n)l, (p)6 (Fall-Winter 1991).
Wright, A. "Rethinking the Circle of Poison: The Politics of Pesticide Poisoning Among Mexican
Farm Workers." Latin American Perspectives, (v)13 (pp)26-59 (1986).
Wright, Beverly H. and Robert D. Bullard. "Hazards in the Workplace and Black Health." National
Journal of Sociology, (v)4 (pp)45-62 (1990).
Wright, R.G. "Hazardous Waste Disposal and the Problems of Stigmatic and Racial Injury."
Arizona State Law Journal, (v)23 (pp)777-800 (1991).
Yamamoto, Andrew J. "The Fight for Environmental Justice: New Skirmishes in the Battle Against
Injustice." Chicano-Latino Law Review, (v)14 (p)30 (Winter 1994).
Young, M.D. Sustainable Investment and Resource Use: Equity, Environmental Integrity, and
Economic Efficiency. Park Ridge, NJ: Parthenon Publishing Group, (1992).
Zah, Peterson. "Environmental Justice and Cultural Conflict." Tulsa Journal of Comparative
& International Law, (v)2 (n)l, (p)129 (Fall 1994).
Zeff, Robbin Lee. Not in My Backyard/Not in Anyone's Backyard: A Folkloristic Examination
of the American Grassroots Movement for Environmental Justice. Thesis (Ph.D.)-Indiana
University, (1989).
Zimmerman, Rae. "Social Equity and Environmental Risk." Risk Analysis, (v)13 (n)6, (pp)649-666
(1993).
Zupan, J.M. The Distribution of Air Quality in the New York Region. Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins University Press, (1973).
Zwerdling, Daniel. "Poverty and Pollution." Progressive, (v)37 (pp)25-29 (January 1973).
Revised as of 05/02/97
-------
-------
-.«.CO eiwiHONMfcN i AL f KOTECHON AGENCY - REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 1997 (October 1996 - September 1997)
—
HfeBffi
—
assistance to eligible
community groups and
federally-recognized tribal
governments that are
working on or plan to carry
out projects to address
environmental justice
Issues.
To provide financial
assistance to environ-
mental and environmental
justice organizations so
that they can provide
assistance to community
groups and tribal
organizations for projects
that address environmental
justice concerns and use
pollution prevention as the
proposed solution.
efficiently address local
environmental justice issues
through active partnerships
with institutions of higher
education.
integrated solid waste
management systems
to solve mmicipal
sold waste
generations and
management
problems at the local,
regonal and national
levels.
10 support state, tribal, ""
and regional programs
that address the reduction i
or elimination of pollution
across all environmental
media: air, land, and
water.
, ''AVs', " ^
s ^ ¦» s
¦" "¦ ' X >
'-s"
* - :
*
4 s '
^ \
. ;v.* . o.
Any effected sommunity
ofgarteai^u®rareffy'» or
government
itfparfeatioBs must be
# * ¦. *
. ' *• s
: <• •? s
tfotpofitoWffies, •'
..goVeKinjent ,.$g$RC*e$
and Indian tribes. ,
State^sncies;;;8taJe y/JZ
orteMlgcvefnmems,
Award Amounts
Fiscal Year 1997
Up to $20,000 each
Up to $250,000 each;
total available nationally
$4.2 million
Up to $250,000 each
Typical award less
than $50,000.
No Individual limit;
total available nationally
$€ million
Tottl Awarded In:
•flsroslafear-.39d6f-:-
-, :;$^^l6te^<3ndly ;s
• . $208,322regionally
' $2 million tiatjonsliy .!*.
$a23,60G.mgtonafly •
.. :^0(:
:• :.V%*•
Matching Share
Required
1
No matching share
required.
Matching funds equal to
5% of the total project cost,
either monetary or in-kind
contributions.
5% non-federal government
matching share required.
5% non-federal
government matching
share required.
50% non-federal
government share of
project total required.
^^wceitonQue
S:: -<:? ;..:MarCh. ' r
:W--':WaCh-;V'S-;r'
^BBTselection
August
September
August
September
September
ilties
f^a?te aj54 lmpr«et» kf
^i^raejWall^aiityof
cOTirian(ty%:
• .::ha^irig:vvjde: application
orBddras^hgahlgh
prfoiity Issue,
• .enhanctogsWlsIn
addressing
environmental justice
Issues and problems,
• establishing or
e^patldng Information
systems for
communities,
• facilitating
communication,
informal ion exchange,
and community
partnerships, and/or
• motivating the public to
be more Conscious ol
environmental justice
issues, leading action to
address those issues.
:.*• Projects by community*,
'based erganiz^tonsaricf
.local goyemmentsthat
inflprove tie environmental
tjuafity of affected. ,
communities using
pollution prevention as a
primary solution.
Proposals that
encourage Innovative
approaches in using
pollution prevention to
address environmental
justice issues, and whose
activities and products can
be applied to other
communities
• Cooperative efforts with
business/industry to
address pollution
prevention goals
jyly tofem^twe%ay
:oc^emSwbelWeen.
••^nrtunitics brfcNsand: "
-iriftiiuilojis of higher
•edupatkm.to;
• address environmental.
justice'issues,
~ identify potluSon
sources,
• :train residents on their
rights and
responsibilities, and
• help resolve environ-
mental problems.
Through these partnerships
communities -will be
encouraged to become
involved in accessing
information from
environmental databases,
cleaning up and restonng
communities that have
environmental problems, and
surveying and monitoring
environmental quality
•>.C{^»pe
-------
SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAMS (Continued - page 2 of 2)
mwxx*vY,; x-:> j-W-
superftind Technical
s
tea
Purpose
To enable a groip of
Individuals who are affected
by a Superfund National
Priorities List (NPL) site to
obtain technical assistance in
Interpreting Information
regarding the site.
To empower states,
commurtties, and other
stakeholders in economic
redevelopment to work
together h a timely manner
to prevent, assess, safely
cleanup, and sustainably
reuse brownfields.
To provide communities funding for
establishing partnerships to
encourage environmentally and
economically sustainable business
practices.
To provide financial suppo:
for projects which design,
demonstrate or disseminaU
environmental education
practices, methods or
techniques.
€Uglble Applicants ^
tftn, Wmftt te-; •
..aoccBpcfe]^aa:ih;;;
:" s". "'y
Stetes,.c^es,:t ¦
iix^goyemrofents. tribes,
and ftc^iaiQdnpnpmSr:.. «•••• v
•organaatiorts.
education 3geott$g=
&wfyerelties,n«ipr<>fit:::
ot^zaftons,6tSte.:: -v.'.
wvipbnrnentaJ agenctss.-ari
npn-commercial educ&tiona
broadcast/rig aoeiiei&£
Award Amount
Rscal Year 1998
Up to $50,000 each initially;
for complex sites, additional
funds may be available.
$505,100 available regionally
Up to $200,000 each; total
available nationally
$5 million
Individual amounts not determined;
total available nationally $5 million
Up to $25,000 each;
total available regionally
$180,00-$200,000
petal Awarded In. . ;v
j$600,QO0regionEffly,-
r
$1?Q,COOreg1oqapy.; •
Matching Share
20% non-federal government
matching share required; in-
kind contributions may be
used to meet this match.
No matching share
required.
20% non-federal government
matching share required.
25% non-federal govemmer
matching share required.
^pjjcation que
if- AnytimeSftei;a«U&is •
proposed lor llsthg on the.
/ ^080-13,1997 •
.: N0tD«f!tBpd<| / •
November 15. .1997
Grant Selection
Announced
After community notification
period (30 to 60 days), review,
processing and approval.
March 1997
New Program
Not Available
Spring 1998 (April 22/ Eartl
Day announcement is
anticipated)
r j
Because.flrilyon&gramts.,
EPA encotla^agroiipste.:
::cbnsol«ate in orcferto ptovkte '
technkal aWstance to the ..
• mostwide(y representa&ve '. : .
grpup of intfvi&ials possible. '
•. To this end, EPA notifies
Hie community vta a. public
rwtjc© In the .(oosf nwspaper
if application i$ received
from an eligible group.
¦ To ensure citizen
involvement h Superfund
cleanup decisions
• To acquire a technical
advisor with appropriate
technical skids and
credentials t<) communicate
site-related Merman on
effectively to the community
¦ Cannot be used to develop
new information/data or
support legal actions
Demonstration pilots thai
jestassesanem. <"
idaWfi<^tfcB,.flharacier. •'
jzaflbn indtfeahujr .
• pfanningaf sites that are '.
threatened wrth
contahinafonby
- drecting special efforts
towardremoving regulatory
banierswtthoutsaCTttkang
pratefctitehes^and,
- facilitating coordinated
public and private efforts of
cleanup'and redevelop-
ment at the federal, state
and local levels.
• To bring together
community groups,
investors/lenders,
developers, and other
affected parties to address
the issue of cleaning up
contaminated sites and
placing 1hem back into
productive use
• Cannot be used at NPL
sites or to fund actual
cleanup
.* Proi^oMp^iioRtiand. •
jrisSMtons, ^veOTneriiand others :':-
tadeyetop focaJfy- appropriata tools
arid processes for j#%tfebfe
environment protection and
econorrtfc development -
> encourapoommuntty
iiwfesimeht in and commitment id
environmental protecfion and an . •
increasing understanding of the
dependence of long-term economic
health on the environment
• Build focal and regional capacity
for conducting and Implementing
sustainable planning
• Identity and design effective
models and tools for supporting
these priorities that can be widely
shared by communities nationwide
• Foster long-term investments ai
innovative sustainability efforts at
the community level
• .Applicants must,, ¦
.demonstratehow the; •
: proposed prqjecl isrteWdr
significantly improved,' has
thapofantial for wide '
application and addresses a
high priority environmental
issue..
• Projects MUST focus on
ONE of the following;
• improving environmental
education teaching skills;
- educating teachers,
students or public about
human health problems,
- building state, local or
tribal government capacity to
develop environmental
education programs,
- promoting environmental
careers among students;
- educating community
through community-based
organization; or
- educating general public
through print, film, broadcast
or other media
Contact Person
Rosemary Patton
Barbara Dick
Annette N Hill/
Thomas Moore
Richard Nawyn
Telephone Number
k
(404) 562-8866
(404) 562-8923
(404) 562-8287
(404) 562-8344
(404) 562-8320
Please contact, the person referenced to obtain additional information or application assistance.
-------
n
c
H
o
w
M
50
£
O
H
C/3
-------
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
A GUIDE TO
FEDERAL GRANT RESOURCES
FOR
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS,
TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
Prepared by
Region Mil
Environmental Justice Program
In Cooperation with
Tribal Assistance Program
Denver, Colorado
May 17, 1996
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A special thanks to all those people that assisted with the preparation of
this guide. However, a few deserve special recognition: the Region VIII
Library, the Environmental Justice Program staff, the NISH Print Shop
staff, the Tribal Assistance Program and Darron Vaughn Jeffries, an intern
from Elizabeth City State University, who prepared this first materials in
August 1995. Thank you for your continued support of the environmental
justice program.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction
II. Using The Guide
EI. Identifying Grant Resources
(See Page 4 For Complete List)
IV. Writing the Grant Proposal
• Suggestions/Strengths/Weaknesses
V. Completing Government Forms
• Checklist for State & Local Governments
• Checklist for Nonprofit Organizations
• Checklist for Tribal Governments
VI. Preparing a Budget, Determining Matching
and Indirect Calculations Requirements
VII. Intergovernmental Review Procedures
VII. US EPA Regional Contacts
-------
INTRODUCTION
-------
INTRODUCTION
On February 11, 1994, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898 on
environmental justice. The Order focuses Federal attention on the environmental and human
health conditions of minority communities and low-income communities and calls on agencies
to make achieving environmental justice part of their mission. The President wanted Federal
agencies to reinvent the way we approach environmental justice so that our day-to-day efforts
will be more effective in protecting the public health and environment.
The Clinton Administration believes that protecting our environment means protecting
our health—the health of our families, our neighborhoods, our economy and our children.
All Americans deserve clean air, pure water, land that is safe to live on, and food that is safe
to eat.
In response to the Executive Order, on April 3, 1995, Administrator Browner
introduced EPA's Environmental Justice Strategy. The purpose of this strategy is to help
bring justice to Americans who are disproportionatley affected by pollution: children
exposed to lead paint in old buildings, farm workers exposed to pesticides, people who fish
in polluted waters, and those who live near hazardous waste facilities.
One of the goals of the Environmental Justice strategy is to give the American people
better access to information they need about our government, as well as significant
opportunities to participate in shaping the government polices that affect and protect our
health and our environment. This guide, which identifies numerous federal grant resources
and programs focused on environmental protection for communities, Tribal governments,
local governments, grassroots organizations, Tribal organizations, environmental
organizations and others, is an important step toward proving protection for all.
1
-------
USING THE GUIDE
-------
USING THIS GUIDE
This guide is intended to be used as an informational resource tool for organizations
;eeking federal resources. Section ID contains 44 program descriptions/excerpts from the
1995 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. This annual publication is a comprehensive
summary of all federal assistance programs. Additionally, this information is in the
computer database FAPRS ( Federal Assistance Program Retrieval System). For information
about this database, contact:
Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog staff
General Services Administration
Ground Floor, Reporters Building
300 7th Street, S. W.
Washington, DC 20407
Telephone (202) 453-4126
A successful grant proposal is one that is well-prepared, thoughtfully planned, and
concisely packaged. The potential applicant or user of this guide should become familiar with
all of the pertinent program criteria related to the program from which assistance is sought
by referring to the information contact person listed in each program description before
developing a proposal to obtain information such as whether funding is available, when
applicable deadlines occur, and the process used by the grantor agency for accepting
applications. Applicants should remember that the basic requirements, application forms,
' formation and procedures vary with the Federal agency making the grant award.
Once a potential grantor agency is identified, call the contact telephone number
identified in Information Contacts and ask for a grant application kit. Due to reorganizations
and relocation by several Federal agencies, the user is encouraged to call for EPA programs
identified, the contacts listed in Section VII. WE APOLOGIZE FOR ANY
INCONVENIENCE but this guide is intended to be informative not inclusive.
The applicant should carefully study the eligibility requirements for each Federal
program under consideration. The applicant may leam that he or she is required to provide
services otherwise unintended such as a service to particular client groups, or involvement of
specific institutions. It may necessitate the modification of the original concept in order for
the project to be eligible for funding. Questions about eligibility should be discussed with the
appropriate program office. Deadlines for submitting applications are often not negotiable.
They are usually associated with strict timetables for agency review. Some programs have
more than one application deadline during the fiscal year. Applicants should plan proposal
development around the established deadlines. Most proposals are made to institutions rather
than individuals. Often signatures of chief administrative officials are required. Check to
make sure they are included in the proposal where appropriate.
2
-------
Proposals should be typed, collated, copied, and packaged correctly and neatly
(according to agency instructions, if any). Each package should be inspected to ensure
uniformity from cover to cover. Binding may require either clamps or hard covers. Check
with the Federal agency to determine its preference. A neat, organized and attractive
proposal package can leave a positive impression with the reader about the proposal contents.
A cover letter should always accompany a proposal. Make sure there is enough time
for the proposals to reach their destinations. Otherwise, special arrangements may be
necessary. Always coordinate such arrangements with the Federal grantor agency project
office (the agency which will ultimately have the responsibility for the project), the grant
office (the agency which will coordinate the grant review), and the contract office (the
agency responsible for disbursement and grant award notices), if necessary.
3
-------
IDENTIFYING GRANT RESOURCES
-------
SOURCE: 1995 - Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance
1. 11.302 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-SUPPORT FOR PLANNING
ORGANIZATIONS
2. 11.800 MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS
3. 11.802 MINORITY BUSINESS RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
4. 15.114 INDIAN EDUCATION-HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT PROGRAM
5. 15.143 TRAINING AND TECHINICAL ASSISTANCE-INDIAN TRIBAL
GOVERNMENTS
6. 16.583 CHILDREN'S JUSTICE ACT DISCRETIONARY GRANTS FOR NATIVE
AMERICANS
7. 66.001 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM SUPPORT
8. 66.003 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MANPOWER TRAINING
9. 66.009 AIR INFORMATION CENTER
10. 66.032 STATE RADON GRANTS
11. 66.419 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL STATE AND INTERSTATE PROGRAM
SUPPORT (106 GRANTS)
12. 66.432 STATE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISION
13 . 66.433 STATE/TRIBAL UNDERGROUND WATER SOURCE PROTECTION
TRIBAL PROGRAM
14. 66.435 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM (CLEAN LAKES
PROGRAM)
15 . 66.438 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
16. 66.458 CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR STATE REVOLVING FUNDS (STATE
REVOLVING FUND)
17. 66.460 NON POINT SOURCE IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS (319 PROGRAM)
4
-------
18. 66.461 WETLANDS PROTECTION STATE/TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
19. 66.463 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
RELATED STATE PROGRAM GRANTS
20. 66.467 WASTEWATER OPERATION TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM
21. 66.500 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION-CONSOLIDATED RESEARCH
22. 66.600 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONSOLIDATED GRANTS-
PROGRAM SUPPORT
23. 66.604 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE GRANTS TO SMALL COMMUNITY
GROUPS
24. 66.700 CONSOLIDATED PESTICIDE COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
25 . 66.708 POLLUTION PREVENTION GRANTS PROGRAM
26. 66.802 SUPERFUND STATE/TRIBAL SITE SPECIFIC COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENTS
27. 66.805 LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TRUST FUND PROGRAM
28 . 66.806 SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR CITIZEN
GROUPS AT PRIORITY SITES
29. 66.807 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE EVALUTION PROGRAM
30. 66.808 SOLED WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
31. 66.810 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS PROGRAM (TAGS)
32 . 66.926 INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL GENERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
33 . 66.950 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM
34. .66.951 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANTS
35. 83.530 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (EMI)-RESEDENT
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM
36. 84.120 MINORITY SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT
5
-------
37. 93.158 ADOLESCENT HEALTH CENTERS FOR AMERICAN INDIANS\
ALASKA NATIVES
38. 93.225 NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDS-HEALTH SERVICES
RESEARCH TRAINING
39. 93.612 NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
40. 93.905 INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH
41. 93.933 RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS FOR INDIAN
HEALTH
42. 93.954 TRIBAL RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF HEALTH
PROFESSIONAL INTO INDIAN HEALTH PROGRAMS
43 . 93.971 HEALTH PROFESSIONS PREPARATORY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
FOR INDIANS
44. 93.972 HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
6
-------
11.302
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT-SUPPORT
FOR PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS
(.Economic Development District Program; Redevelopment
Area Program; and Indian Program)
FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law
89-136, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3151, 3152.
OBJECTIVES: To assist in providing administrative aid to multicounty districts,
redevelopment areas and Indian tribes to establish and maintain economic development
planning and implementation capability and thereby promote effective utilization of resources
in the creation of full-time permanent jobs for the unemployed and the underemployed in
areas of high distress.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grants are used for staff salaries and other planning
and administrative expenses of the funded economic development organization.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: (1) Public bodies and other nonprofit organizations representing
groups of State-delineated and EDA-approved adjoining counties, which include at least one
area designated as a redevelopment area by the Secretary of Commerce and one or more
growth centers not over 250,000 population; (2) Indian Tribes; and (3) counties designated as
redevelopment areas or nonprofit organizations representing redevelopment areas or pans of
such areas.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Areas and regions of substantial and persistent unemployment
and residents (particularly unemployed and low income persons) of those areas.
Credentials/Documentation: Evidence that the governing body of the development
organization is at least 51 percent elected officials and broadly representative of the social,
economic and political groups in area.
7
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapptication Coordination: Submission of letter of interest and proposed work
program to the EDA Regional Office serving the area. State and EDA concurrence in
organization and boundary of multi-county district. An applicant should consult the office in
his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in
applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: The application is submitted through an the Regional Office.
Award Procedure: Applications for continuation grants are approved by the EDA
Regional Office Director or, in the case of new grantees, by the Assistant Secretary for
Economic Development.
Deadlines: Contact your regional/local EPA office.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 30 to 90 days.
Appeals: Not applicable.
Renewals: Grants are made for a 1-year period and are renewable if grantee's
performance is satisfactory; the area continues to exhibit distress, and the proposed work
program is acceptable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of 25 percent must be obtained
from nonfederal sources except for grants to Indian tribes. This may be in the form of cash
and in-kind contributions. The Secretary is authorized to fund up to 100 percent planning
support grants to Indian tribes.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Up to I year. Funds are released in two payments
over the course of the grant period.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly financial reports; progress reports five months and 10 months after
grant approval; annual updating of an Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP) due
on June 30 of every year.
Audits: State and local governments that receive financial assistance of S 100,000 or
more within the State's fiscal yc*: shall have an audit made for that year.
8
-------
Records: Financial records must be maintained until 3 years after the completion of
the grant project or submission of the final financial report, whichever is later, and be readily
available for inspection and audit. All financial and programmatic records, supporting
documents, statistical reports, and other records of grantees or subgrantees are required to be —
maintained by the terms of the agreement.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 13-205041452.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 S20,554,000; FY 93 est S20,254,0S, and FY 94 est
S20,254,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: S25,000 to SI 13,000; S58,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact your local/region EPA office.
Headquarters Office: Luis F. Bueso, Director Planning Division, Economic
Development Administration, Room H7319, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Washington, DC
20230. Telephone: (202) 482-2873.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Support to hire professional staff or the following
types of areas; a 10-county rural organization; a 5-County rural/urban organization; a
5-county rural organization that includes an Indian reservation; a 500,000 acre Indian
reservation; and a 30,000-acre Indian reservation.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Criteria for funding include: satisfactory
past performance, continued economic distress, and submission of an acceptable work
program The program presupposes continuing administrative support and new grants are
infrequent. Priorities for the selection of new grantees focus on the extent of persistent
economic distress, length of time potential grantee has been authorized or designated as a
district, quality of proposed work program, and interregional balance.
9
-------
11.800
MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
CENTERS
(MBDC)
FEDERAL AGENCY: MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AUTHORIZATION: Executive Order 11625, October 13, 1971; Department of Commerce
Appropriation Act, PublicJ-aw 103-121.
OBJECTIVES: To provide business development services for a minimal fee to minority
firms and individuals interested in entering, expanding or improving their efforts in the
marketplace. Minority business development center operators provide a wide range of
services to clients, from initial consultations to the identification and resolution of specific
business problems.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA)
competitively selects and funds approximately 100 MBDCs to provide management and
technical assistance to minority clients located in designated Metropolitan Areas (MAs)
throughout the country. Recipients of MBDC funds provide clients with advice and
counseling in such areas as preparing financial packages, business planning and counseling,
business information and management assistance, accounting guidance, marketing,
business/industrial site analysis, production, engineering, construction assistance,
procurement, and identification of potential business opportunities. The agency does not have
the authority to make loans to minonty businesses. Program funds are restricted to providing
management and technical assistance.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: There are no eligibility restrictions for this program. Eligible
applicants may include individuals, nonprofit organizations, for-profit firms, local and State
governments, American Indian Tribes, and educational institutions.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Recipient is to provide assistance to minorityowned businesses
or minorities interested in starting a business. Consideration will be given to (1) firms that
r-e currently operating a business and seeking to expand it; (2) current businesses that have a
need for assistance in order to survive. (3) other potential business persons who wish to enter
a business venture with a good probability for success; and (4) businesses that are current or
former participants in the Small Business Administrations 8(a) procurement assistance
program.
10
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Pre-award and post award conferences will be
scheduled for most MBDA projects.
Application Procedure: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Award Procedure: The application package will advise the applicant where to submit
the application. Each application will be reviewed and evaluated by MBDA. Name checks,
verification of academic credentials and pre-award audits may be required from applicants.
Deadlines: Deadlines for formal competitive awards are outlined in the Federal
Register and Commerce Business Daily.
Range of Approval/ Disapproval Time: From 4 to 6 months. Unsuccessful applicants
shall be notified in writing at the same time that notification is sent to the successful
applicant.
Appeals: All decisions are final. There is no administrative appeal process.
Renewals: MBDC awards are made for a period of one year with the possibility to
renew for up to tow additional years. Performance evaluations will be conducted, and
funding levels will be established for each of the three budget periods. The MBDC will
receive continued funding after the initial competitive year at the discretion of MBDA based
upon the availability of funds, the MBDC's performance, and agency priorities.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula. In
most program areas MBDA has established minimum requirements for matching or cost
sharing by the recipient. MBDCs are required to provide a minimum 15 percent cost sharing
through in-kind contributions and cash, including chent service fees. MBDA reserves the
right to decide on a case-by-case basis whether a nonfederal contribution is required in other
program areas so as to successfully implement the program.
Length and Time Pnasing of Assistance: For 1 to 3 years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Financial (quarterly and annually); narrative (quarterly and annually);
statistical reports on each client are required.
Audits: State and local governments that receive between S25,000 and S100,000
within the State's fwal year shall have an audit made.
11
-------
Records: Documents, papers, and financial records relating to the MBDC are required
to remain available to the Federal Government for 3 years from the date of submission of the
final financial status report. All financial and programmatic records, supporting documents,
statistical reports, and other records of grantees or subgrantees are required to be maintained
by the terms of the agreement. The grantee must retain records for three years after
completion of the project or submission of the final financial report, whichever is later, and
be readily available for inspection and audit.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 13-020141-376.
Obligations: (Cooperative Agreements) FY 93 S22,623,984; FY 94 est S25,165,600;
and FY 95 est S24,061,000.
Range and Average of Finaciall Assistance: S165,000 to SI,074,526; S218,000
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, MBDA funded business
development centers in approximately 100 locations that provided management and technical
assistance to minority business enterprise clients, of the 15,428 clients who received
assistance in fiscal year 1993, 10,906 represented actual operating business enteipnse chents.
Clients obtained S312.0 million in financial packages and S635.5 million in procurement
contracts.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Headquarters Office: Ms. Loretta Young, Acting Assistant Director, Office of
Operations, Room 5063, Minority Business Development Agency, Department of Commerce,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Telephone: (202) 482-1015.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: In FY 1993, a large accounting hum won the
competition to operate the MBDC in Houston that provides management and technical
assistance to eligible mi nority business clients to foster the development and operation of
businesses.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Competitive awards for the MBDC program
are made based on a panel evaluation of the applicant s demonstrated ability to provide
business assistance as described in the application. This evaluation includes other factors
such as capability and experience of staff assigned to the project, techniques, methodology,
resources and costs.
12
-------
11.802
MINORITY BUSINESS RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT
(PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)
FEDERAL AGENCY: MINORITY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AUTHORIZATION: Executive Order 11625, October 13, 1971; Department of Commerce
Appropriation Act, Public Law 103-121.
OBJECTIVES: The resource development activity provides for the indirect business
assistance programs conducted by MBDA. These programs encourage minority business
development by identifying and developing private markets and capital sources; expanding
business information and business services through trade associations; promoting and
supporting the mobilization of resources of Federal agencies and State and local governments
at the local level; and assisting minorities in entering new and growing markets.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements
or Contracts).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Funds will be used in support of the MBDA policy
statement on funding Resource Development programs. MBDA is charged under Executive
Order 11625 with fostering new minority business enterprises and maintaining and
strengthening existing firms to increase their opportunities to participate and receive the
benefits of our economic system. MBDA uses a portion of its program funds to award
contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to public and private sector entities which
have the greatest potential for developing access to capital, market, and other opportunities
on behalf of minority business. The performance of each funded recipient is evaluated on a
scheduled basis. Renewals are based on Agency priorities and performance of recipients.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Applicants for this program are established businesses,
professional organizations, individuals, trade associations and chambers of commerce.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Beneficiaries of this program are minority business
persons/firms.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: A preapplication conference may be scheduled for
resource development projects.
13
-------
Application Procedure: The standard application forms as furnished by the
Department of Commerce must be used for this program.
Award Procedure: The application package will advise the applicant where to submit-
the application. Each application will be re viewed and evaluated by MBDA. Name checks,
verification of academic credentials and pre-award audits may be required from applicants.
Deadlines: Deadlines for formal competitive awards are outlined in
the Federal Register and Commerce Business Daily.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 4 to 6 months. Successful and
unsuccessful applicants shall be notified in writing at the same time.
Appeals: All decisions are final. There are no administrative appeals.
Renewals: Resource development awards may be renewed after the successful
completion of the initial competitive project award, at the discretion of the agency for two
additional years without undergoing formal competition for participating in this program,
subject to the availability of funds and the satisfactory performance of the recipient.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Projects may require a mini mum amount of
cost-sharing in the form of in-kind contributions and cash.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: For 1 to 3 years depending on the
requirements of the projects.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Financial (quarterly and annually), narrative (quarterly and annually);
statistical reports are required.
Audits: Unresolved audit issues of a substantive nature may result in the recipient not
being considered for continuation of funding. State and local governments that receive
between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit.
Records: Documents, papers and financial records relating to the resource
development program are required to remain available to the Federal Government for 3 years
from the date of submission of the final financial status report. All financial and
programmatic records, supporting documents, statistical reports, and other records of funded
recipients are required to be maintained by the terms of the award document. The recipient
must retain records for 3 years after completion of the project or submission of the final
financial report, whichever is later, and be readily available for inspection and audit.
14
-------
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 13-0201-0-1-376.
Obligations: (Cooperative Agreements/Contracts) FY 93 S2,030,639
FY 94 est $2,250,000; and FY 95 est S2,317,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: S2,500 to S235,000;
$97,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact the nearest Minority Business Development
Agency.
Headquarters Office: Mr. C. Howie Hodges, Assistant Director, for Program
Development, Room 5096, Minority Business Development Agency, Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Telephone: (202)
482-5770.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: An organization received a contract award in the
amount of $178,228 under the 1993 competitive program. Activities included developing
export development training curriculum, seminars, a training manual and providing business
information to MBDA funded business assistance centers and the Minority business
Ipmmunity.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Competitive awards for the resource
development program are made based on a panel evaluation of the applications. This
evaluation includes such factors as capability and experience of staff assigned to the project;
techniques and methodology resources and costs.
15
-------
15.114
INDIAN EDUCATION-HIGHER
EDUCATION GRANT PROGRAM
(Higher Education)
FEDERAL AGENCY: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR
AUTHORIZATION: Snyder Act of 1921, Public Law 67-85, 42 Stat. 208, 25 U.S.C. 13.
OBJECTIVES: To provide financial aid to eligible Indian students to enable them to attend
accredited institutions of higher education.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Giants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds are to supplement the total financial aid
package prepared by the college financial aid officer. Funds are intended to assist students in
pursuing their undergraduate baccalaureate degree.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Must be a member of an Indian tribe, or, who is at least a
one-fourth degree Indian blood descendent of a member of an Indian tribe which is eligible
for the special programs and services provided by the United States through the Bureau of
Indian Affairs to Indians because of their status as Indians, be enrolled or accepted for
enrollment in an accredited college, have financial need as determined by the institution's
financial aid office.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Must be a member of an Indian tribe, be enrolled or accepted
for enrollment in an accredited college, have financial need as determined by the institution's
financial aid office.
Credentials/Documentation: Certificate of Indian blood; college financial aid
package; statement of acceptance by college, Bureau of Indian Affairs grant application.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Acceptance at a college or university and application
for financial aid from the college using their approved needs analysis system.
Application Procedure: Students must be accepted by a college or university. Application
forms are completed by applicant in accordance with instructions available upon request from
the Education Line Office, or tribal contractor administering the program for the applicant's
16
-------
tribal group. Completed forms are submitted to the students higher education:
at the appropriate office. ^
*•1
Award Procedure: When an award is granted, student is notified and
the applicant in care of college or university financial aid office.
Deadlines: Determined by the Education Line Office and/or tribal conua«^v«.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 6 to 10 weeks when all required documents
are submitted.
Appeals: From the administering office to agency/Area Education Program
Administrator, to Director, Office of Indian Education Programs, to Assistant Secretary -
Indian Affairs to Secretary of the Interior.
Renewals: Grants may be continued through undergraduate if student maintains
acceptable progress and academic standing. Renewal applications must be submitted annually
with updated grades or transcript.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Students are expected to take advantage of the
campus-based financial aid programs offered to all students, and any other scholarships
which may be available to them.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants are generally made for the academic
year on a quarter or semester basis. Grant is for a period not to exceed 5 years, or the period
of time required to complete the course of study.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: academic progress, change of courses, dropout
intentions, and graduation (degree received and date of graduation). Reports: Grade reports
of students applying for continuation of grants are to be submitted at the end of each
academic year.
Audits: None.
Records: None.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 14-2100-0-1-501
Obligations: (Total program funds including grants) FY 93 $29,280,000; FY 94 est
$29,395,000; and FY 95 est $29,791,000.
17
-------
Range.and Average of Financial Assistance: Average for fiscal year 1992 $425;
1993 $8,200; Range S350 to S7,450.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal years 1993, 14,800 students were assisted
each year.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Headquarters Office: Office of Indian Education Programs, Code 522, Room MS
3512-MIB, 1849 C Street^NW, Washington, DC 20240. Contact: Mr. Reginald Rodriguez.
Telephone: (202) 2084871.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Undergraduate applicant (typical): Student, single,
freshmen; 41/64 Oglala Sioux; Black Hills State College, South Dakota; major/minor,
Undecided; degree objective: BS; total budget $5740. Student Contribution S700, Pell S2200;
BIA S2800. Married or advanced degree applicant (typical): Student, married with three
family members; 1/2 Sioux Tribe; University of North Dakota; major-medicine/minor,
Biology; degree objective: MD; total budget $12,245; Pell $1625, CWS $1200, NDSL
$1200, SEOG $400, Student Contribution $700, BIA S5,900.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Any member of an Indian tribe served by
BIA. Enrolled in an accredited institution in pursuit of a regular or advanced degree. Must
have a demonstrated financial need as determined by the institution's financial aid office.
18
-------
15.143
TRAINING AND TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE-INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
(Self-Determination Training and Technical Assistance)
FEDERAL AGENCY: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR
AUTHORIZATION: Public Law 93-638, Section 103, as amended, 88 Stat. 2203.
OBJECTIVES: To aid Indian Tribes to exercise self-determination in accord with Public
Law 93-638.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Contracts); Advisory Services and Counseling;
Provision of Specialized Services; Training.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Application Procedure: Written resolution of governing body and submittal of grant
application.
Award Procedure: Grant application is approved or disapproved, ranked and
prioritized within the Area Office jurisdiction and funding recommendations are transmitted
to Central Office for final funding approval under revised regulations.
Deadlines: Contact your local regional EPA office.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 30 days after application is received by Area
office.
Appeals: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Renewals: Not applicable except when applicant is approved and funded as a
multi-year project.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
<
Formula and Matching Requirement: Not applicable.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Single year grants were awarded July 1,
1995 and will end on June 30, 1996.
19
-------
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: 6 month monitoring reports project year end final reports quarterly
programmatic and fiscal reports.
Records: As required by Grant Award.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 14-2100-0-1-452.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $19,830,000; FY 94 est $22,905,000; and FY 95 est
$24,004,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: May range from approximately $25,000
upward depending upon the service area population to be served.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During fiscal year 1994, 375 grants were awarded to
Indian tribes and 32 grants were awarded to off reservation Indian organizations. In fiscal
year 1995 , 564 grants will be awarded.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Information can be secured from the Agency
Superintendents and from Area Directors.
Headquarters Office: Division of Social Services, Office of Tribal Services, Bureau
of Indian Affairs, MS:310-SIB 1849 C Street, NW, Washington,. DC 20245. Contact: Betty
Tippeconnie, Code 45Q Telephone: (202) 208-2721.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Eastern Cherokee (North Carolina)
Comprehensive Child Welfare Program.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: 1) Proposals which best promote the
purposes of Title II of the Act taking into consideration the identified community need for
child and family service programs of the applicant, 2) The relative accessibility which the
Indian population to be served has to existing child and family service programs, and 3) The
extent to which the proposed program would duplicate any existing child and family service
programs emphasizing the prevention of Indian family breakup. Grants for on and near
reservation shall be limited to the governing body of the tribe to be served, while preference
for grants to off-reservation programs will be given to organizations demonstrating
substantial support from the Indian community to be served.
20
-------
16.583
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE ACT
DISCRETIONARY GRANTS FOR NATIVE
AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES
(Children's Justice Act for Native American Indian
Tribes)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE FOR VICTIMS OF
CRIME, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
AUTHORIZATION: Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (VOCA), as amended, Public Law
98473; Children's Justice and Assistance Act of 1986, Public Law 99401, as amended;
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Public Law 100-690, Section 1402 (g)(1), and the
Appropriations Act of 1994 for the Department of Commerce, Justice, the State, the
Judiciary, and Related Agencies.
OBJECTIVES: Fifteen percent of the first $4.5 million of funds from the Crime Victims
Fund that are transferred to the Department of Health and Human Services as part of the
Children's Justice Act are to be statutorily reserved by the Office for Victims of Crime
(O.C.) to make grants for the purpose of assisting Native American Indian tribes in
developing, establishing, and operating programs designed to improve the handling of child
abuse cases, particularly cases of child sexual abuse, in a manner which limits additional
trauma to the child victim and improves the investigation and prosecution of cases of child
abuse.
iTES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants; Direct Payments for Specified Use.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Funds are available specifically for the purpose of
assisting Indian tribes in developing, establishing, and operating programs designed to
improve (a) the handling of child abuse cases, particularly cases of child sexual abuse, in a
manner which limits additional trauma to the victim and (b) the investigation and prosecution
of cases of child abuse, particularly child sexual abuse.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Federally recognized Indian tribal governments and nonprofit
organizations that provide services to Native Americans. Specific criteria will vary depending
on the grant.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Native American youth who are victims of child abuse and/or
child sexual abuse.
21
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Application Procedure: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Award Procedure: Awards may be granted to nonprofit organizations that provide
services to Native Americans or State or local government. If an award is granted to a State,
the State will subgrant the monies down to private nonprofit and/or public agencies for the
purposes specified in the application, and in conformance with all general and special
conditions.
Deadlines: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 2 to 4 months. .
Renewals: Awards range from 12 to 36 months. Renewals are considered on a
case-by case-basis.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: There are no formula or matching
requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants are generally awarded for a 12 to 36
month time period.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Both quarterly and final financial report and a quarterly program
performance report.
Audits: State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000
within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit.
Records: Financial records, supporting document statistical records, and all other
records pertinent to a grant shall be retained for a period of three years.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 15-5041-0-2-754.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $553,491; FY 94 est $1,092 747; and FY 95 est
$675,000.
22
-------
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Not applicable.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Thirty-one tribal programs to improve the
investigation and prosecution of child sexual abuse cases have been funded.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: None.
Headquarters Office: Cathy Sanders, Program Specialist, Federal Crime Victims
Division, Office for Victims of Crime, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice,
633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20531. Telephone: (202) 514-6445.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Tribes will implement a variety of programs to
improve the way in which child sexual abuse cases are handled in Indian country. Examples
of some of the activities are: development of written protocols between agencies to minimize
the number of child interviews and improve case management; provision of child advocacy in
the court process; reduction in the amount of time required to investigate cases of child
sexual abuse; revision of tribal codes to include child abuse; establishment of special multi
disciplinary child interviewing teams; provision of specialized training for investigators and
judicial personnel; and increase the numbers of child sexual abuse cases prosecuted in tribal,
State, and Federal courts. Training and technical assistance for tribes in implementing the
grants awarded.
23
-------
66.001
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM
SUPPORT
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Air Act of 1963, Section 105, as amended Public Law 101-549.
OBJECTIVES: To assistJState, municipal, inteimunicipal, and interstate agencies in
planning, developing, establishing, improving, and maintaining adequate programs for
prevention and control of air pollution or implementation of national primary and secondary
air quality standards.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds may be used for costs specifically incurred
in the conduct of a State/Local Air Pollution Program project in accordance with the
purposes enumerated in the approved application. These include personnel costs, supplies,
equipment, training of personnel, travel, and other necessary expenditures during the
approved project period. Funds may not be used for construction of facilities, nor for
expenses incurred other than during each approved award period.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Any municipal, intennunicipal, State, or interstate agency with
legal responsibility for appropriate air pollution planning development and establishment of
air pollution control activities and operation of activities for grant support provided such
organization furnishes funds for the current year that are equal to or in excess of its
expenditures for the previous year for its air pollution program. The determination of
expenditures is subject to decisions based on provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable
grant regulations. This program is available to each State, territory and possession of the
U.S., including the District of Columbia.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Municipalities, intennunicipalities, States and interstate
agencies.
Credentials/Documentation: The application must supply evidence of legal authority
for air pollution control; evidence of the availability of nonfederal matching funds; evidence
that the Governor or his designated State agency has been given the opportunity to comment
on the relationship of the program to be funded to the State plan; and a workable program
officially adopted for the agency.
24
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapptication Coordination: Discussion with the applicable EPA Regional Office is
idvised for air program grant applications. The standard application forms are furnished by
the Environmental Protection Agency.
Application Procedure: Requests for application forms and completed applications
must be submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional Grants Administration Branch.
Application must meet the requirements of the grant regulations and will be reviewed to
determine merit and relevancy of the proposed project.
Deadlines: None.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Ninety days.
Appeals: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: State, interstate and intennunicipal programs
with an approved applicable State Implementation Plan may receive up to 60 percent Federal
funding. Not more than ten percent of the funds available shall be granted for air pollution
control programs in any one State. Up to one-half of one percent of the funds are to be made
available as a minimum to a State. However, award of these funds will be made only if the
agencies within the State meet the requirements of the act and grant regulations.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The terms of the grant shall be determined
at time of grant award.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: As specified in the grant award and through applicable regulations (usually
quarterly interim, and final progress and expenditure reports).
Audits: Subject to inspection and audit by EPA and Comptroller General. Periodic
audits should be made as pan of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal
control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. State and local
governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal
year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive between
525,000 and S100.000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance
with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
25
-------
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years
from the date of submission of the annual financial status report. If questions still remain,__
such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 $163,818,900; FY 93 est $174,588,600; and FY 94 est
$172,880,600.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $45,000 to $55,000; $50,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: For program information: contact appropriate EPA
Regional Office.
Headquarters Office: For program infonnation:Ronnie towsend, Air Quality
Management Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and
Radiation, MD-15; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Telephone: (919) 541-2498.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: 1) State Department of Environmental Protection,
Bureau of Air Control; 2) County Air Pollution Control; 3) State. Board of Health; 4) State
Air Control Board; 5) State Air Resources Board, and 6) Local Air Pollution Control
Agencies. Air pollution control program grants are provided to State and local control
agencies for purpose of operating programs that plan and implement activities to achieve
ambient air quality standards.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: The criteria for awarding air pollution
control program assistance giants arc provided in the 1990 Clean Air Act, Section 105, and
set forth in State and local assistance grant regulations. Some of the criteria considered for
award include the following: 1) No giant may be awarded unless the program contained in
the grant application meets the requirements of that has been approved by the Regional
Administrator. The State or local agency needs to prepare an adequate application. 2) No
giant may be awarded until the Regional Administrator has consulted with the official
designated by the Governors) of the State(s).Such consultation should consider the role of
the applicant in the enforcement of any applicable implementation plan and confirm that the
applicant's program will be generally compatible with the objectives of the applicable
implementation plan. 3) No grant may be awarded for any budget period when the estimated
26
-------
recurrent expenditures of nonfederal funds for the agency will be less than the recurrent
expenditures of nonfederal funds were for such agency during the preceding budget period.
4) No grant may be awarded unless the Regional Administrator has determined that the
agency has adequate air pollution control authority and necessary regulations to implement
such authority.
27
-------
66.003
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MANPOWER TRAINING
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1963, Section 103, as amended, Public Law
101-549 (Nov. 15, 1990), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To develop career-oriented personnel qualified to work in pollution
abatement and control. Grants are awarded for maintenance of environmental training
programs and to increase the number of professionally trained pollution control abatement
practitioners in State and local air pollution control agencies.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: In addition to the EPA general grant conditions, each
training grant is subject to the following conditions: (a) Recipients of assistance under
training grants must be citizens of the U.S., its territories, or possessions or lawfully
admitted to the U.S. for permanent residence, (b) The grantee shall not require the
performance of personal services by trainees receiving financial grant assistance, (c)
Generally, grants provide for student support through loans which are forgivable if the
student serves two years in a governmental air pollution program. Amount of support is
announced annually in program guidance issued by the program office.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Training grants are awarded to nonprofit academic institutions
in the U.S. and territories. Traineeships are awarded to individuals by these grantee
educational institutions. Trainees may be employees of state or local governmental air
pollution control agencies and others who desire a career in governmental air pollution
control work, but priority in awards is assigned to State/local air pollution control agency
personnel.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Nonprofit academic institutions; State and local air pollution
control agency personnel.
Credentials/Documentation: This program is excluded from coverage under OMB
Circular No. A-87.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Discussion with program office is advisable. The
standard application forms as furnished by . the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular
28
-------
No. A-102 must be used for this program. This program is excluded from coverage under
E.O. 12372.
Application Procedure: This program is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular
to. A-110. Requests for application forms and completed applications must be submitted to
the Grants Administration Division, PM 216, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC 20460.
Award Procedure: Each application shall be subjected to administrative evaluation to
determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and to technical and
program evaluation to determine the merit and relevancy of the project.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 90 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart F,
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of five percent cost sharing is
required of academic institutions.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The project period for a training grant may
not exceed three years. Traineeships may not exceed one year of full-time study.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Interim and final progress reports, expenditure, invention, and equipment
reports.
Audits: Giants are subject to inspection and audit by representatives of EPA and the
Comptroller General of the U.S., or any authorized representative. Periodic audits should be
made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal control to meet
terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the provisions of
OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," State and local
governments that xeceive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal
year shall have an aadit made for that year. State and local governments that receive between
$25,000 and S1O0J0OO within the state's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance
with Circular Na. A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the
programs in whidh they participate.
29
-------
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration
of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still
remain, such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the
matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $470,000; FY 95 est $400,000; and FY 96 est
$375,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $55,000 to $70,000; av $65,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: A total of 26 training courses were conducted
covering 14 subject areas for approximately 550 students at seven training centers during
fiscal year 1994. Ten graduate traineeships were supported in fiscal year 1994 and five are
expected in fiscal year 1995.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Individuals are encouraged to communicate with the
appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in .
Headquarters Office: For information concerning grant applications and procedures,
contact Environmental Protection Agency, Grants Administration Division, PM 216,
Washington, DC 20460. For program information, contact Ronnie Townsend, Information
Transfer and Program Integration Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Office of Air and Radiation, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711. Telephone: (919) 541-2498.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Not applicable.
30
-------
*6.009
AIR INFORMATION CENTER
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1963, as amended, Public Law 95-95, 42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To disseminate technical information, provide information on the published
literature on air pollution and to provide copies of EPA (and to a limited degree, other)
publications as long as supplies last.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Established by annual program guidance.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Information on the published literature and
publications can be used to plan, support, and facilitate many kinds of air pollution control
activity.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: literature searches axe made for: State and governmental air
pollution control agencies; U.S. territories and possessions; nonprofit citizens environmental
groups; foreign governments; and EPA grantees and on site contractors. Publications are
provided, while supplies last, to all parties upon request.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and local governments; nonprofit citizens environmental
groups; EPA grantees and on site contractors.
Credentials/Documentation: For literature searches, verification of requester's
identity is needed. For EPA contractors and grantees, project officer approval is needed.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: None.
Application Procedure: For literature searches, a letter or phone call describing the
subject upon which information is needed should be communicated to the EPA/ERC library.
To request copies of publications, a letter or telephone call specifying the item desired is
necessary. See INFORMATION CONTACTS for address and telephone number.
Award Procedure: Not applicable.
Deadlines: iWe.
31
-------
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Not applicable.
Appeals: Not applicable.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Not applicable.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Not applicable.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: None. Audits: None. Records: None.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0200-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Salaries and Expenses) Fif 94 est$42,716; FY 95 est $44,852; and FY
96 est $46,095.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Not applicable.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: There are 2,200 literature searches and 10,000
publications provided each year.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: None.
Headquarters Office: Library Services Office, Librarian, MD-35; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. Telephone: (919)
541-2777.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Not applicable.
32
-------
66.032
STATE INDOOR RADON GRANTS (SIRG)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Indoor Radon Abatement Act (IRAA), 15 U.S.C. 2661, Section 306;
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Title I, Section 10(a).
OBJECTIVES: IRAA Section 306 and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 10
authorizes EPA to assistlStates and Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in the development
and implementation of programs and projects reducing radon risks. Specifically, EPA will
award funds to: 1) establish effective radon programs among States, Territories, and
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes; 2) increase the number of homes and schools tested and
mitigated for radon; 3) encourage radon testing and disclosure in connection with real estate
transfers; 4) implement radon resistant construction standard in high risk areas; and S)
promote environmental equity through programs and outreach efforts directed at minority
populations.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The following activities are eligible for funding under
SIRG: radon surveys, public information and educational materials, radon control programs,
purchase of radon measurement equipment or devices, purchase and maintenance of analytic
equipment, training, program overhead and administration, data storage and management,
mitigation demonstrations, and toll-free hotlines. Funding for these eligible activities may be
used to develop State radon response programs. States may, at the governors direction,
provide assistance to local governments for public information, educational materials, radon
control programs and training.
RESTRICTIONS: The statute places the following restrictions on the use of Federal funds:
1) States may not receive continuation grant funding unless EPA determines that the State
satisfactorily implemented the activities funded by the grant in the preceding budget period,
2) State expenditures for measurement equipment/devices and mitigation demonstrations
cannot exceed 50 percent of the grant amount in a budget period, 3) State expenditures for
general overhead and program administration cannot exceed 25 percent in a budget period.
States may use grant funds for financial assistance to persons only to the extent that such
assistance is related to demonstration projects or the purchase and analysis of radon
measurement devices, and States may not use grant funds for the costs of EPA's Radon
Contractor Proficiency Program. References:
33
-------
EUGIMDtiyy
-------
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 90 days.
Appeals: Not applicable.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula. EPA
may provide States with up to 50 percent of allowable costs of approved SIRG Program
activities. Federally Recognized Indian Tribes are required to provide at least 5 percent of
allowable costs of the project.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants are funded on a 12-month basis
(yearly).
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Established by annual program guidance. To monitor the performance of
each State,J the EPA Project Officer and other Agency personnel will conduct mid-year (or
more frequent) site visits to states to inspect program activities first hand.
Audits: Subject to inspection and audit by EPA and Comptroller General. Periodic
audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal
)1 to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the
^x^^sion of Attachment P to Circular A-102, "Uniform Requirements for Grants to State and
Local Governments," audits shall be made of organizations carrying out this program at least
once every two years. These audits will be made in accordance with the General Accounting
Office guidelines, "Standards for Audit of Government Organizations, Programs, Activities
and Functions," and additional OMB guidance.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years
from the date of submission of the annual financial status report. If questions still remain,
such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $8,962,000; FY 95 est $8,158,000; and FY 96 est
$8,158,000.
35
-------
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: It is anticipated that Federal funding
will range from $5,000 to. $500,000 per applicant. The anticipated average Federal funding
per applicant is $150,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Established in fiscal year 1990, the State Indoor
Radon Grant Program has assisted States, the District of Columbia, Guam and numerous
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes to establish radon programs. The program is now
focused on achieving results in the areas of radon awareness, testing and mitigation. In 1992,
1993 and 1994, surveys were taken to assess levels of radon awareness testing, and
mitigation nationally and at the State level.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: For questions of a programmatic/technical nature, contact
the appropriate Regional Radon Office representative listed in .
Headquarters Office: Sheila Brown, Radon Division, 6604J, Office of Radiation and
Indoor Air, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
Telephone: (202) 233-9439.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: EPA will base its review of SIRG
applications on whether they reflect the program's goals and promote integrity in States' use
of grant funds. Pursuant to Section 306(e), if State applications exceed the funds appropriated
for award in a fiscal year, EPA will prioritize State activities based on the following criteria:
1) the seriousness and extent of the radon contamination problem to be addressed; 2) the
potential for the activity or project to bring about reduction in radon levels; 3) the potential
for the development of innovative radon assessment techniques, mitigation measures as
generator, or program management approaches which may be of use to other States; 4) the
potential for the activity to implement EPA's model radon-resistant building standards; 5) the
potential for the development of radon programs in high risk areas; and 6) the potential for
the activity to improve the effectiveness and viability of the State program.
36
-------
66.419
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL STATE AND INTERSTATE PROGRAM SUPPORT
(106 GRANTS)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act, Section 106, as amended, Public Law 95-217, 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To assist States (including territories, the District of Columbia, and Indian
Tribes qualified under Section 518(e)), and interstate agencies in establishing
and maintaining adequate measures for prevention and control of surface and ground water
pollution.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Broad support for the prevention and abatement of
surface and ground water pollution from point and nonpoint sources including permitting,
pollution control studies, planning, surveillance and enforcement; advice and assistance to
local agencies; training; and public information. Funds cannot be used for construction,
operation, or maintenance of waste treatment plants, nor can they be used for costs financed
by other Federal grants.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State and interstate water pollution control agencies as defined
in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Agencies making application for funds must
submit annually their pollution-control program to the appropriate EPA Regional
Administrator for approval. Requirements of the program are based on Section 106 of the
Act, and 40 CFR Parts. 35 and 130.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and interstate water pollution control agencies and
Indian Tribes qualified under Section 518(e) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments. State and interstate agencies show
compliance with 40 CFR 35, Subpart A.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Informal meetings are held between regional office,
State, territorial and Indian tribe applicant agencies concerning program preparation. The
37
-------
standard application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular
No. A-102 must be :sed for this program. The giant agreement must adequately reflect the
priorities identifiei n the State/EPA Agreement. This program is eligible for coverage
under E.O. 12372 Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should
consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for
more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance,
if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: The grants application must be submitted to the appropriate
EPA Regional Office, Grants Administration Branch (see Appendix IV of the Catalog).
This program is excluded~from coverage under A-110.
Award Procedure: Application is reviewed by appropriate EPA Regional Office and
if approved, is signed by the Regional Administrator.
Deadlines: Application forms must be submitted according to dates established by the
Regional Administrator.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 30 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 30 Subpart L.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula. As
stated in the Clean Water Act, appropriated funds are allotted among the State and Interstate
Water Pollution Control agencies on the basis of the extent of the water pollution problems in
the respective states. State allotment ratios are based on a count of pollution sources for each
state compared to a count of pollution sources in the Nation. Interstate allotment ratios are
based on the level of funding received in fiscal year 1973. Currently four factors are used in
the formula: municipal dischargers, industrial dischargers, power generators and feed lots.
Each State must maintain a minimum level of effort; see funding agency for further details,
and 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart A. The amount of actual State contributions vary widely.
Qualified Indian tribes are eligible for Section 106 funding on a population based formula.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: One year; payments are approved quarterly
and disbursed monthly.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Annual expenditure reports; semiannual program evaluations; revised
budget following reallocation of funds; other reports as Grant Agreement requires.
38
-------
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of
State and Local Governments," State and local governments that receive financial assistance
of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year.
State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the state's
fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance
with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years
from the date of submission of the annual financial status report. If questions still remain,
such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $86,035,000; FY 95 est $79,534,000; and FY 96 est
$80,700,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $40,000 to $3,455,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In each fiscal year, grants are awarded to encourage
and support the conduct of Water Pollution Control programs by the 50 States, six
territories, the District of Columbia, six Interstate Commissions, and Indian Tribes qualifying
under Section 518(e).
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: General Grant regulations and
Procedures, Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR Part 30); Handbook of Procedures,
State and Interstate Program Grants; Environmental Protection Agency, State and Local
Assistance Programs, Grants for Water Quality Planning, Management and Implementation
(40 CFR Part 35 and 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart A); "EPA Assistance Administration Manual,"
available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 on a
subscription basis, Order No.: NTIS UB/031.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in
Appendix IV of the Catalog.
39
-------
Headquarters Office: Carol Crow, Office of Wastewater Management, Office of
Water, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202)
260-6742.
RELATED PROGRAMS: 66.454, Water Quality Management Planning; 66.600,
Environmental Protection Consolidated Grants Program Support.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Grants to States for the administration of State
programs for the prevention, reduction and control of pollution. Activities funded include
administration of State NPDES permit programs; compliance and enforcement, monitoring,
and hazardous materials spills response.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Section 106 funds are awarded to State,
territory, interstate and Indian tribal agencies in accordance with overall water quality
management needs, the requirements of programs covered by these agreements, and annual
EPA Programs guidance.
40
-------
66.432
STATE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SUPERVISION
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Public Health Service Art, as amended; Safe Drinking Water Art of
1974, Public Law 93-523, as amended; Public Law 95-190; Public Law 96-16; Public Law
96-502; Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1986.
OBJECTIVES: To foster development and maintenance of State programs which implement
the Safe Drinking Water Art.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The funds are to be used to develop and implement a
public water system supervision program adequate to enforce the requirements of the Safe
Drinking Water Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State agencies designated by the Governor or Chief Executive
Officer of one of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islan
-------
Application Procedure: The grant application including State Program Plan, must be
submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional Administrator. This program is excluded from
coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110.
Award Procedure: State Program Plan is reviewed, and if approvable, signed by tKe
Regional Administrator.
Deadlines: Applications must be submitted 60 days before the beginning of the
agreed upon budget period.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Maximum of 60 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Funds appropriated each year are allotted on
the basis of State population (20 percent) as contained in the most currently available
Statistical Abstract; State land area (10 percent) as contained in the most currently available
Statistical Abstract; the number of community water systems in the State (56 percent) and the
number of non-community water systems in the State (14 percent); all water system
inventories being provided by the states. No State except American Samoa, Guam, the
Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territories of the Pacific, and the Virgin Islands may be
allotted less than 1 percent of the FY 89 appropriation. The five territories noted shall not be
allotted less than 1/3 percent of the FY 89 appropriation. Three percent of the
National total available grant funds are set-aside for Indian land activities in accordance with
the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1986. The formula factors and minimums are statutory and
the weightings are Agency imposed. Federal assistance is limited to 75 percent of eligible
costs, not to exceed the State allotment.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Annual grants. There is no restriction
placed upon the time permitted to spend the award. Awards released through letters of Credit
or reimbursement.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Annual onsite evaluation, final financial and progress report as set forth in
the grant agreement.
Audits: Grants are subject to inspection and audit by EPA. the Comptroller General
of the U.S., or any authorized representative. Periodic audits should be made as part of the
recipient's systems of financial management and internal control tc meet terms and conditions
42
-------
of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No.
A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," State and local governments that receive
financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit
made for that year. State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000
within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No.
A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which
they participate.
Records: Financial records including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years
from the date of submission of the annual financial status report or until any audit exceptions
have been resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $67,401,000; FY 95 est $70,000,000; and FY 96 est
$90,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: (FY 94) $113,400 to $3,992,600;
$1,121,658.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During fiscal year 1994, 57 States and territories
received grants.
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Financial Assistance for
Continuing Environmental Programs (40 CFR 35, Subpart A); General Grant Regulations
and Procedures (40 CFR Part 30). "EPA Assistance Administration Manual," available from
the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 on a subscription basis.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in
Appendix IV of the Catalog.
Headquarters Office: Craig Damron, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
(WH-550E) Drinking Water, Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC 20460 Telephone: (202) 260-5556 (use the same number for FTS).
RELATED PROGRAMS: 66.433, State Underground Water Source Protection.
43
-------
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Grant funds are utilized by the States for such
purposes as State regulation review, program plan developments, data management,
inventory of drinking water systems, public participation, technical assistance and
enforcement.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: (1) Adequacy of State's annual program
plan for the adoption and enforcement of drinking water regulations which are no less
stringent than the national primary drinking regulations. (2) Designation of a State agency to
receive the grant and be responsible for conducting the public water system supervision
program. (3) Compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 30 and 40 CFR 35.
44
-------
66.433
STATE/TRIBAL UNDERGROUND WATER SOURCE PROTECTION
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Public Law 93-523, as amended,
Public Law 96-63, Public Law 96-502, as amended; Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments
of 1986, Public Law 99-339,42 U.S. C. 300.
OBJECTIVES: To foster development and implementation of underground injection control
(UIC) programs under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The funds are to be used to develop and implement an
underground injection control program adequate to enforce the requirements of the Safe
Drinking Water Act. Major program elements and outputs are listed in the Annual Program
Guidance.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: States and Indian Tribes that qualify as States that have
delegated primary Enforcement Authority pursuant to SDWA amendments of 1986.
Beneficiary Eligibility: States and Indian Tribes.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Pre-application coordination with appropriate regional
offices recommended. Applications are subject to State and areawide clearinghouses review
pursuant to procedures in the proposed 40 CFR Part 19. The standard application forms as
furnished by the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for
this program. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as
the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State
requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for
review.
45
-------
Application Procedure: The grant application must be submitted to the appropriate
EPA Regional Administrator. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular
No. A-110.
Award Procedure: Program plan is reviewed, and if approved, and signed by the
Regional Administrator.
Deadlines: State program plans should be submitted to the appropriate Regional
Administrator by June 1.
Range of Approved/Disapproval Time: Approximately 60 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 30, Subpart L.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program operates under a formula which
uses criteria set forth in the SDWA, Section 1443(b)(4). Except for Indian Tribes, Federal
assistance is limited to 75 percent of eligible costs, not to exceed the State allotment. The
statistical factors used for allocation include 1) population of State, based on data from
Estimates, Statistical Abstracts, 1987 Census; 2) State land area, based on data from
Statistical Abstracts, 1980, Census and official updates; 3) injection practices by State, based
on data reported by States and maintained by EPA injection well inventory as of January
1994. For Indian Tribes, Federal assistance is limited to 90 percent of eligible costs.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Annual grants.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Established by annual program guidance. Annual on-site evaluation.
Audits: Giants are subject to inspection and audit by EPA, the Comptroller General
of the United States, or any authorized representative. Periodic audits should be made as part
of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal control to meet terms and
conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the provisions of OMB
Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," State and local governments
that receive financial assistance Of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have
an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and
$100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular
No. A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in
which they participate.
46
-------
Records: Financial records including all documents which support entries on
accounting records and substantiate charges to each grant must be kept available to person^
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three year;
from the date of submission of the annual financial status report, or until any audit
exceptions have been resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 est $10,401,000; FY 95 est $10,923,000; and FY 96 est
$10,500,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: FY 94 $33,100 to $1,001,300;
$184,211.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1994, 42 States had primacy for 36
full and 6 partial programs.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in_.
Headquarters Office: Francoise Brasier, Chief, Underground Injection Control
Branch, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Office of Water, (4602)
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone:
(202) 260-7077.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Grant funds are utilized by the States for such
purposes as State regulation review, program plan developments, data management,
inventory of injection facilities, identification of aquifers, public participation, technical
assistance and review, permit approval and enforcement, and surveillance and investigation.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: 1. Adequacy of State's annual program
plan for an enforceable underground injection control program; 2. compliance with
requirements of 40 CFR 30 and 35, and Executive Older No. 12367 (Revised); 3.
designation of a State agency to receive the grant and be responsible for coordinating the
underground water source protection program; 4. evidence that Federal grant funds will not
supplant the State's nonfederal funding committed to underground water source protection
efforts. For Indian Tribes 1. demonstration of State adequacy; 2. demonstration of the tribe's
intent, adequate legal authority and resources to implement specific program elements
outlined in 40 CFR 144, 145, 146 and 148.
47
-------
66.435
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM
(Clean Lakes)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 314, as amended, Public Law
95-217, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To provide financial assistance to States for assessing the water quality of
publicly owned lakes; diagnosing the causes of degradation in publicly owned lakes;
developing lake restoration and protection plans; implementing these plans to restore and
preserve the lake; and post restoration monitoring to determine the longevity and
effectiveness of restoration.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Available for allowable direct cost expenditures
incident to project performance plus allocable portions of allowable indirect costs of the
applicant, in accordance with established EPA policies REDO
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: By statute, State agencies and certain Indian Tribes (as
designated by Section 518(e) of the Water Quality Act of 1987). However, through written
interagency agreements, funds may be passed through to city and county governments or
other locally and municipally constituted authorities. This program is available to each State,
Indian Tribe (designated by Section 518(e), territory and possession of the U.S., including
the District of Columbia. After April 1, 1988, a State/Tribe must submit bi-annually an
approved Lake Water Quality Assessment to be eligible for assistance under the program.
Beneficiary Eligibility: The potential public interests served by the applicant
authority.
Credentials/Documentation: Cost will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular NO. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Discussion with program and regional offices is
essential. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 1237 "Intergovernmental Review
of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the
single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State
48
-------
requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for
review. Reference to the EPA Clean Lakes Program Guidance Manual is highly
recommended.
Application Procedure: Application forms and completed applications should be
requested from and submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. The standard
application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular No.
A-102 must be used for this program. An environmental impact assessment is required for
this program. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110.
Award Procedure: Each application shall be subjected to administrative evaluation to
determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and to program
evaluation; technical and extramural reviews determine the merit and relevance of the
project.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 90 days.
Appeals: No appeals procedure. However, revised proposals may be submitted. A
standard grant application should be prepared and submitted which will be reviewed in the
same manner as a new application and will compete for available funds.
Renewals: None. However, consideration is given to continuing, lengthy and
involved projects on a phased basis. The applicant is provided opportunity to apply for
subsequent phases.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of 30 percent cost sharing is
administratively required for lake diagnostic feasibility studies (Phase I), with a maximum of
$100,000. A minimum of 50 percent cost sharing is administratively required for
implementation projects (Phase II). A minimum of SO percent cost sharing is administratively
required for Lake Water Quality Assessments (30% in hardship cases), with a maximum of
$100,000 per study for two years. For post-restoration monitoring (Phase ID), funding
assistance up to $125,000 will be available and will require at least a 30 percent non-federal
match.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Approved project period may not exceed
three years for Phase I, four years for Phase n, five years for Phase HI and five years for
Lake Water Quality Assessments.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
49
-------
Reports: Quarterly interims and final progress, expenditure, equipment and invention
reports.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, that receive—
financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit
made for that year. State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000
within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No.
A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which
they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to report entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be maintain^ for three years from
the date of submission of the annual financial status report. If questions still remain, such as
those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-7801-0-8-304.
Obligations: FY 94 $4,973,000; FY 95 est $3,200,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: 1) Diagnostic-Feasibility Study (Phase
I) grants-$10,500 to $100,000; av $63,210; 2) Implementation Project (Phase II) grants:
$51,403 to $265,400; av $145,723; 3) LWQA: $1,000 to $100,000; over $53,700; and 4)
Phase HI $65,674 to $125,000; over $106,200.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Funded Phase I projects assist the recipient in
determining a lake's current condition and developing possible methods for lake restoration
and protection. Funded Phase II projects implement the most feasible restoration/protection
alternatives for a particular lake and its watershed. Such activities include watershed
pollution controls, BMP's, diversion and flushing of sediment and nutrients, shoreline
stabilization, phosphorus precipitation and inactivation, hypo limnetic withdrawal,
hypolimnetic aeration, sediment oxidation, sediment removal, and lake drawdown. Phase HI
Studies are to determine the longevity and effectiveness of various restoration techniques,
thereby advancing the science of lake restoration. Through fiscal year 1993, 49 States and 18
Indian Tribes have received Clean Lakes grants totaling approximately $139 million in
Federal funds. Since the program was initially funded in 1976, State and Tribal grants have
included 320 Phase I, 238 Phase n, 13 Phase m and 70 Lake Water Quality Assessment
grants.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
50
-------
Regional or Local Office: Individuals are encouraged to communicate with the
appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in .
Headquarters Office: For information concerning grant application procedures,
wiitact Environmental Protection Agency, Grants Administration Division, (3903F),
Washington, DC 20460. For program information, contact Frank Lapensee (4503F),
Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds,
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-7105.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: See PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: A Clean Lakes project must involve a lake
that is publicly owned. Evaluation of project proposals included considerations of: (1)
technical feasibility, (2) public benefits, (3) adverse environmental impacts, (4) improvement
in fish and wildlife habitat, (5) degree project considers "open space" policies, (6)
reasonableness of proposed cost relative to proposed work, (7) State priority ranking, and (8)
proposed operation and maintenance program.
51
-------
66.438
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 205(g), as amended, Public Law
95-217; Water Quality Act of 1987, Public Law 100-4, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To assist and serve as an incentive in the process of delegating to the States
a maximum amount of authority for conducting day-to-day matters related to the management
of the construction grant program. An oveniding goal is to eliminate unnecessary duplicate
reviews and functions.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: To defray expenses incident to the States' assumption
of full responsibility for the certification of the technical and administrative adequacy of
specifically required construction grant documentation. Responsibilities which may be
delegated include the certification of documents pertinent to the award of grants and related
activities. The Regional Administrator shall retain authority for actual award amendment and
termination of grants and payments; and shall make: (a) final determinations under the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, (b) final civil rights determinations, (c) final
procurement protest appeal determinations, (d) final resolution of audit exceptions, and (e)
determination that an overriding Federal interest exists in a particular project which requires
greater Federal involvement. Restrictions also include required adherence to specifically
defined functional areas/activities and output qualities which the State must maintain In
addition, EPA periodically monitors the State's program and the appropriateness and
adequacy of its outputs. Section 205(g) of the Clean Water Act, and 40 CFR Part 35,
Subpart A, require States to maintain 1977 level of effort unless there has been a general
non-selective reduction in the programs of the executive management agencies of the State.
References:
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State Water Pollution Control Agency, or other agency
designated by the Governor in any State, territory and possession of the U.S., including the
District of Columbia, and eligible Indian Tribes.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State agencies involved in the administration of the
construction grants program.
Credentials/Documentation: Formal agreement accompanying the application: (a)
naming the State agency, (b)itemizing the grant functions to be delegated, and (c) outlining
52
-------
organization, staffing, and EPA overview requirements. Costs will be determined in
accordance with OMB Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments. Summary:
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Pre-application assistance should be obtained from the
appropriate regional office. A delegation agreement must be executed between the State
agency and the Regional Administrator before award of the initial grant. The standard
application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular No.
A-102 must be used for this program (EPA form 5700-31, Application for Federal
Assistance, Short Form). This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372,
"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or
official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on
the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has
selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Requests for application forms and completed applications
must be submitted to the appropriate EPA regional office. Negotiation of the delegation
agreement constitutes a major part of the application procedure. This program is excluded
ffom coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110.
Award Procedure: Grant application and delegation agreement are reviewed by the
appropriate EPA regional office and, if approved, grant is awarded by the Regional
Administrator.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Established by annual program guidance.
Appeals: As described under 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart F.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Each fiscal year the Administrator may
reserve an amount not to exceed 4 percent of a State's annual allotment based on authorized
appropriations or $400,000, whichever amount is greater, for the purpose of making
construction management assistance grants to defray costs of performing the delegated
functions.
53
-------
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: No time limitation is placed on assistance.
Disbursements are made in accordance with prearranged schedules (supported by cost
documentation from the recipient agency). Grants should cover at least two full years of
operation.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Periodic reports (timed as specified in the agreement) are required from the
recipient agency. Evaluations will be conducted to review 205(g) grant expenditures,
progress in meeting benchmarks in the delegation schedule, and the achievement of annually
established program goals.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of
State and Local Governments," State and local governments that receive financial assistance
of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year.
State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's
fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance
with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to the grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years
after final settlement and if questions still remain, such as those raised as a result of audit,
related records should be retained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0103-0-1-304.
Obligations: Established by annual Agency budget.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $400,000 to $10,857,440; av
$1,652,071.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Fifty States plus Puerto Rico have received grants
and have been certified to conduct certain aspects of the grant program.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Interested parties may contact tne appropriate regional
office listed in_.
54
-------
Headquarters Office: Arnold Speiser, Municipal Support Division, 4204, Office of
Wastewater Management, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460.
Telephone: (202) 260-7377.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: State water pollution control agencies are
provided funds to defray expenses incident to the State's assumption of full responsibility for
the conduct of certain construction grants requirements. These activities include review and
certification functions, related to facilities plans and plans and specifications, inspections,
grant applications, construction contracts, financial management systems, technical and
administrative adequacy,_adequacy of requests for payments, O & M manuals, engineering
sub-agreements, change orders, etc. States may also transfer 205(g) funds into a State
Revolving Fund pursuant to C W A Section 205 (m). (See SRF initial Guidance.)
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Grants are given only to States and the
State must possess (or be able to gain) the expertise requisite to carrying out the delegated
functions. Agreements for such grants will stipulate the State's organizational unit (to carry
out the functions), staffing plan, accounting and auditing system, detailed statement on
delegated functions, and schedule for assuming additional delegated functions.
55
-------
66.458
capitalization grants for state revolving funds
(STATE REVOLVING FUND)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act, Public Law 95-217, as amended; Water Quality Act
of 1987, Sections 601 through 607, 205(m), Public Law 100-4.
OBJECTIVES: To create State Revolving Funds (SRFs) through a program of
capitalization grants to States which will provide a long term source of State financing for
construction of wastewater treatment facilities and implementation of other water quality
management activities (see 66.418).
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Fonnula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Capitalization grants are available to each State for the
purpose of establishing a clean water State revolving fund for providing assistance (1) for
construction of publicly owned wastewater treatment works, (2) for implementing nonpoint
source management activities included in State Plans developed pursuant to Section 319 and
(3) for developing and implementing an estuary conservation and management plan under
Section 320. The capitalization grant is deposited in the SRF, which is used to provide loans
and other types of financial assistance, but not grants, to local communities and
intermunicipal and interstate agencies. Assistance may be provided to persons for
implementing nonprofit source estuary management activities if provided for in State Plans
developed under Sections 319 and 320. Up to four percent of the grant amounts may be
used for the cost of administering the SRF.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: States, territories and possessions of the U.S., including the
District of Columbia may use allotments under Title n as grants for the construction of
municipal wastewater facilities. Indian tribes are not eligible to receive capitalization grants.
Beneficiary Eligibility: For loans and other financial assistance (but not grants) for
wastewater treatment facilities-local communities, intermunicipal, State, interstate agencies,
and Indian tribes. For nonpoint source management programs and estuary activities in
approved State Nonpoint Source Management Programs and Comprehensive Conservation
and Management Plans - the above public agencies and individuals if specified in the
approved plans and programs.
56
-------
Credentials/Documentation: To receive a capitalization grant, a State shall enter in
an agreement with the EPA Regional Administrator which shall include, but not be limited
to, the ten specifications set forth in Section 602(b) of the CWA. OMB Circular No. A-87,
"Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments"
applies to State grantees.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: An applicant (State) should seek preapplication
assistance from the appropriate EPA Regional Office. The State is required to prepare and
provide for public comment on a plan identifying the intended uses of the funds in the SRF
(an intended use plan) and how those uses support the goals of the SRF. The plan is to be
submitted no later than the application. An environmental impact statement is not required
prior to grant award; however, a State environmental review process must be applied to all
subsequent state assistance for wastewater facilities. This program is eligible for coverage
under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs". An applicant should
consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for
more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance,
if the state has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: The standard application for EPA nonconstruction grant
assistance (EPA Form 5700-33) is submitted to the appropriate Regional Office. The State
must certify in its application that it has the legal, managerial, technical and operational
capabilities to administer the SRF program competently and that it will comply with Federal
antidiscrimination laws and other applicable Federal statutes. Regulation 40 CFR Part 31
applies to the State. Establishment of the SRF is a prerequisite for a grant award.
Award Procedure: A grant application is reviewed by the appropriate Regional
Office and, if approved, the grant is awarded by the Regional Administrator under a
delegation of authority from the Administrator of EPA.
Deadlines: Applications should be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office no
later than July 3 of the year following the year of appropriation to allow sufficient time for
review and processing prior to the September 30 reallotment deadline.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approval time averages 45 days.
Appeals: As described in EPA's Regulation 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart t.
Renewals: For those portions of the State program that do not change from year to
year, a subsequent grant application may incorporate by reference relevant portions of the
previous year's application which have not changed.
57
-------
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: The Regional Administrator may award
capitalization grants from appropriations of fiscal year 1987-1990 Title II authorizations and
from appropriations of fiscal year 1989 to 1994 Title VI authorizations. The allotment of
Title II and Title VI SRF appropriations to the States is determined by a table of decimal
fractions ("formula") in Section 205(c)(3) of the CWA. The required State match is 20
percent of the amount of each Federal grant payment.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Funds are available for EPA's obligation to
the State during the fiscal year in which they are allotted and during the following year. The
State must agree to enter into binding commitments with recipients to provide financial
assistance from the SRF in an amount equal to 120 percent of each quarterly grant payment.
The State is also required to agree to expend all funds in the SRF in an expeditious and
timely manner.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Beginning the first fiscal year after receiving payments the State shall
provide an annual report to the Regional Administrator in accordance with the schedule
established in the grant agreement (generally not later than 90 days after the end of the fiscal
year in which the payments were received). The annual report shall describe how the State
has met the goals and objectives for the preceding fiscal year as identified in its intended use
plan, including identification of loan recipients, loan amounts, and loan terms and similar
details on other fonns of financial assistance provided from the SRF.
Audits: At least once a year EPA will conduct, or require the State to have
independently conducted, a financial and compliance audit of the SRF and the operations of
the SRF. State-conducted audits may be performed in conjunction with the Single Audit Act
of 1984. In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State
and Local Governments," State and local governments that receive financial assistance of
$100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State
and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal
year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance with
Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: As part of the annual review conducted by the agency to assess the State's
performance against activities identified in the intended use plan and annual report, and to
determine compliance with the terms of the capitalization grant agreement, the State or loan
recipient shall make available to EPA such records as the Regional Administrator reasonably
requires to review and determine State compliance with the requirements of the CWA.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
58
-------
Account Identification: 68-0103-0-1-304; 68-0103-7-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $1,196,000,000; FY 95 est $1,235,200,000; and FY 96
est $1,587,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $10,000,000 to $216,000,000;
$30,000,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: As of September 1994, 250 awards were made to 50
States, plus Puerto Rico. The estimate of awards in fiscal year 1995 is 51 (50 States plus
Puerto Rico).
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Program guidance issued January
28, 1988. A State Revolving Fund Management Manual was distributed in November, 1988.
Regulations include 40 CFR Part 31 and SRF regulations 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart K which
were issued in March 1990.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: EPA Regional Offices listed in Appendix IV of the
Catalog.
Headquarters Office: Don Niehus, State Revolving Fund Branch, Municipal Support
Division, (4204), Office of Wastewater Management, Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-7366.
RELATED PROGRAMS: 66.438, Construction Management Assistance.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: State revolving loan fund.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Grants are awarded to States that satisfy
the requirements outlined in the application procedure section.
59
-------
66.460
NONPOINT SOURCE IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS
(319 Program)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act (CWA), Title HI, Section 319(h).
OBJECTIVES: To assist States in implementing EPA (approved) Section 319 nonpoint
source management programs.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Funds are provided to States to carry out nonpoint
source projects and programs pursuant to Section 319 of the Clean Water Act as amended by
the Water Quality Act of 1987. Under Section 319 (h), funds awarded for implementing
States' nonpoint source management programs remain available for obligation by the State
for the Federal fiscal year in which they are awarded and for the subsequent fiscal year.
Other requirements under Section 319 (h) include: Nonfederal matching funds of at least 40
percent of project costs; maintenance of effort; proceeds of State grants may be used for
financial assistance to individual persons in the case of demonstration projects only: limit on
administrative costs; annual reporting; and EPA determinations of adequate State progress
before additional funding. Funding may be used only to support implementation of EPA
(approved) State nonpoint source management programs, as opposed to development of new
programs or plans. EPA guidance issued February 15, 1991 and updated for FY 94, and
June 24, 1993, identifies base priorities for funding. Additional priorities are contained in
annual guidance issued by EPA Headquarters and by EPA Regiqnal Offices. References:
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam,
Northern Marianas, Puerto Rico, Pacific Trust Territories, Virgin Islands, and Indian Tribes.
Grants are awarded to a single agency in each State designated by the governor as the lead
nonpoint source agency. The lead nonpoint source agency may distribute grant funds to other
organizations in accordance with its work program which is approved by EPA.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and local governments, interstate and intrastate
agencies, public and private nonprofit organizations and institutions. The lead nonpoint
source agency may distribute grant funds to other organizations in accordance with its work
program which is approved by EPA.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
60
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Pre-application coordination with the appropriate EPA
lal Office is recommended. The standard application forms as famished by the Federal
agency and required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program. This
program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of
contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be
followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Grant application must be submitted to the appropriate EPA
Regional Office (refer to Appendix IV of the Catalog for list of Regional Offices).
Award Procedure: Grant application must be submitted to the appropriate EPA
Regional Office to determine the overall adequacy of the application to meet the statutory
objectives.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: EPA generally awards grants within 60 days
after the application is submitted.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR part 31, Subpart F
Renewals: Not applicable.
tsooISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Nonfederal match of at least 40 percent of
project or program costs is required. The State must also meet maintenance of effort
requirements contained in statute.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: As determined in accordance with Section
319 (h).
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Annual expenditure reports are requested. Progress reports are generally
required at least semi-annually.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A- 128, "Audits of
State and Local Governments."
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
61
-------
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be kept for three years from
date of submission or the annual financial status report. If questions remain, records must be
retained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0103-0-1-304; 68-0103-7-1-304.
Obligations: (Giants) Section 319 (h): FY 94 $76,810,900; FY 95 est
$100,000,000; and FY 96est $100,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Not yet determined.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Grants have been awarded annually to all States.
Grant funds were used by States to implement portions of their NPS management programs.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in
Headquarters Office: Dov Weitman, Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch,
Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, Office of Wetlands, Ocean and watersheds,
(WH-553), EPA, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-7100
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Nonpoint Source implementation projects funded
include best management practices (BMP) installation for poultry wastes; design and
implementation of BMP systems for stream, lake, and estuary watersheds; and basin-wide
landowner education programs.
CRITERIA FOR SELEC" TNG PROPOSALS: Funds are aw: :ed to States in accordance
with Section 319 (h).
62
-------
*6.461
WETLANDS PROTECTION STATE/TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
EDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act (CWA), Public Law 92-500, as amended, Section
104(b)(3), 33 U.S.C. 1254(b)(3).
OBJECTIVES: To assist States and Indian tribes in developing new or enhancing existing
wetlands protection programs.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: These grants are intended to encourage State wetlands
protection program development or to enhance/augment existing effective State programs.
The projects that will be funded under this program should support the initial development of
a State"s wetlands protection program or support enhancement/refinement of a State"s
existing program. It is anticipated that funding will fall into two broad categories of projects:
(1) encouragement of developing new programs or (2) augmentation of ongoing, effective
State wetlands programs. Grant funds cannot be used for operational support of State
wetlands protection programs. Projects must clearly demonstrate a direct link to increasing a
State"s ability to protect its wetlands resources. References:
tLIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State agencies (wetlands protection, water quality (401
certification agency), and/or any State agency with wetlands related programs), Federally
recognized Indian Tribes, and interstate/inter-tribal agencies are eligible to receive funding.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and Tribal agencies involved in administering wetlands
protection programs or programs related to or complementary with wetlands protection
programs.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Pre-application coordination with appropriate regional
office is encouraged. The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and
required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program. This program is
eligible for coverage under E.O. 1237 "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An
applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his
63
-------
or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying
for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Complete application forms and forward to the appropriate
program contact.
Award Procedure: Grant applications are reviewed by the appropriate Regional
Office and, if approved, grant is awarded by the Regional Administrator. The Wetlands
Division will review regional decisions.
Deadlines: Established by annual guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Grants are usually approved within 4 months
of receipt of complete application.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart F.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Total grant project is the Federal share and
the required minimum State match. In this case, the required minimum State match is 20
percent of the total project costs. This does not preclude the State from putting additional
funds into the project.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The terms of the grant shall be determined
at time of grant award.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly interim and final progress and expenditure reports program
evaluations and other reports as required by the specific terms of the Agreement.
Audits: Grants are subject to inspections and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative. Periodic
audits should be made as part of the recipient" s systems of financial management and internal
control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the
provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," State and
local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State"s
fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive
between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State"s fiscal year shall have an audit made in
accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations
governing the programs in which they participate.
64
-------
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each grant must be kept available to personnel
i ized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration
< « years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still
remain, such as those raised as a result of audit related records should be retained until the
matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $4,149,000 FY 95 est $15,000,000 and FY 96 est
$15,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: In fiscal year 1994, EPA awarded 100
grants to 45 States, 18 Indian Tribes, and three territories. Grant awards ranged from
$16,000 to $316,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Funding in fiscal year 1994 focused on development
of State Wetland Conservation Plan, Section 404 Assumptions Assistance and Wetland
Protection Approach Demonstration Projects.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Doug Thompson, Water Management Division, EPA,
rvCgion I, Boston, MA 02203. Telephone: (617) 565-4422. Dan Montello, Water
Management Division, EPA, Region II, New York, NY 10278. Telephone: (212) 264-5170.
Barbara D'Angelo, Environmental Services Division, EPA, Region ID, Philadelphia, PA
19107. Telephone: (215) 597-9301. Eric Hughes, Water Management Division, EPA,
Region IV, Atlanta, GA 30365. Telephone: (404) 347-3633. Sue Elston , Water
Management Division, EPA, Region V, Chicago, IL 60604. Telephone: (312) 886-6115.
Beverly Ethridge, Environmental Services Division, EPA, Region VI, Dallas, TX 75202.
Telephone: (214) 655-2263. Diane Hershberger, Environmental Review Branch, EPA,
Region VII, Kansas City, KS 66101. Telephone: (913) 551-7573. Gene Reetz, Water
Management Division, EPA, Region VHI, Denver, CO 80202. Telephone: (303) 293-1568.
Phil Oshida, Water Management Division, EPA, Region IX, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Telephone: (415) 974-1971. Bill Riley, Water Management Division, EPA, Region X,
Seattle, WA 98101. Telephone:(206) 422-1412.
Headquarters Office: Lori Williams, Wetlands Division, Office of Wetlands, Oceans
and Watersheds (4502F), EPA, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone:
(202) 260-5084.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: None.
65
-------
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Each application will be reviewed by EPA
according to the following criteria: (1) Clarity of Proposal Work Plan (2) Success of
previous projects (3) Likelihood of Success (4) Transferability to other States (5) Potential
environmental results and (6) Investment/Commitment of State.
66
-------
66.463
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
RELATED STATE PROGRAM GRANTS
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Water Act, Public Law 92-500, as amended, Section 104(b) (3),
33 U.S.C. 1254(b)(3).
OBJECTIVES: To assist States and Indian Tribes in implementing new requirements
relating to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, such as
developing and implementing control strategies for combined sewer overflow and storm
water discharge problems, pre-treatment and sludge program activities and municipal
water pollution prevention.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Assistance will be targeted to States that commit to
specific activities. Eligible activities must be of a relatively short time frame (one to two
years) with tangible results. All projects should achieve and demonstrate results. Grants are
not to be awarded to fund ongoing State program activities. Typical projects will include
development of specialized model general permits for storm water; development of State
ISO control programs for targeted watersheds; development of approvable programs to
Implement the sewage sludge regulations; and development of pre-treatment measures to
minimize pollutants from CSOs. There will be $500,000 of fiscal year 1994 funds used by
States for implementing Municipal Pollution Prevention Program (MWPP) pilot programs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility. State water pollution control agencies, interstate agencies, other
public agencies and nonprofit institutions are eligible applicants.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State Water Pollution Control Agencies, interstate agencies
and other public agencies involved in NPDES related program implementation.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplication coordination with appropriate Regional
Office is required. The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and
required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program. This program is
67
-------
eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs."
An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in
his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in
applying for assistance if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Application forms and completed applications should be
requested from and submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional Office identified in Appendix
IV of the Catalog.
Award Procedure: Projects will be developed by potential grantees; reviewed,
approved, awarded and managed by Regions. States should contact the appropriate Regional
office for proposal and application institutions.
Deadlines: States should work with the appropriate Regional office to develop a
preliminary package or proposals and submit these to the Regions. Deadline established by
Region.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Regional review will be done within
approximately 60 days following submittals.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Not applicable.
Length of Time Phasing of Assistance: The terms of the grant shall be determined at
time of grant award, within the framework of a one to two year time span.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Semi-annual reports on progress to the Regions and an annual report to
Headquarters. A schedule showing interim milestones and the outputs that will be completed
by the end of the project period will also be included, as will any specific requirements
included in the grant agreement.
Audits: Grants are subject to inspections and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative.
Periodic audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management
and internal control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In
accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State and Local
Governments," State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or
68
-------
more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local
governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall
>-^e an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128," or in accordance with Federal
ind regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each grant must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration
of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still
remain, such as those raised as a result of an audit, related records should be retained until
the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0103-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $21,968,300; FY 95 $22,500,000; and FY 96 est
$22,500,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $25,000 to $500,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1994, a study of the extent and control
of floatables and development of model construction and general permits was completed.
fiULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: All procedures and requirements
I be in conformance with 40 CFR 31 "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
amruooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments" and OMB Circular Nos. A-87
"Cost Principles for State and Local Governments" and A-102„ "Grants and Cooperative
Agreements for States and Local Governments".
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in
Appendix IV of the Catalog for information on the grants administration process. For
information on programmatic or technical details contact the following Regional water
program staff: EPA Region I (Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, New Hampshire, Massachusetts
and Rhode Island): William Nuzzo, Water Management Division, John F. Kennedy Federal
Building, Room 2203, Boston, MA 02203, (617) 565-3480; EPA Region n (New York, New
Jersey, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands): Hank Mazzuca, Water Management Division, Jacob K.
Javitz Federal Building, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY, 10278, (212) 264-0376; EPA
Region HI (Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, District of
Columbia): Ken Cox, Water Management Division, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia,
PA, 19107, (215) 597-8211; Region IV (North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Kentucky, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida): Grace Deatrick, Water Management
69
-------
Division, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA, 30365, (404) 347-4450; EPA Region V
(Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana): Peter Swenson, Water Management Division,
230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL, 60604, (312) 886-0236; EPA Region VI (Texas,
Arkansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Louisiana): Gene Wossum, Water Management
Division, First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain Place, 1445 Ross Avenue, 12th Floor Suite
1200, Dallas, TX, 75202-2733, (214) 655-7170; EPA Region VH (Missouri, Kansas,
Nebraska, Iowa): Ted Gezzsert, Water Management Division, 726 Minnesota Avenue,
Kansas City, KS, 66101, (913) 551-7444; EPA Region VIE (Colorado, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, Wyoming, Montana): Janet LaCombe, Water Management Division, 999 18th
Street, Denver, CO 8020^ (303) 293-1593; Region IX (California, Arizona, Hawaii,
Nevada, Trust Territories): Mark Flachsbart, Water Management Division, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA, 94015, (415) 744-1906; EPA Region X (Washington, Oregon,
Alaska, Idaho): Jeanne Brown, Water Management Division, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
WA, 98101, (206) 553-1058. Headquarters Office: Lois Canada, Office of Wastewater
Management (WH-546), EPA, 401 M Street, SW., Washington DC, 20460. Telephone:
(202) 260-5807.
RELATED PROGRAMS: 66.419, Water Pollution Control_State and Interstate Program
Support; 66.454, Water Quality Management Planning.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Characterization of Wet Weather discharges from
tributaries; WWTFs; and CSOs; Stonnwater/CSO modelling; establishing administrative
program to process and approve stormwater permits; developing model State sludge program;
integration of watershed approach into NPDES program.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Projects will be selected based upon the
adherence to the national guidance, Regional/State priority; and National transferability.
70
-------
66.467
WASTEWATER OPERATOR TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, Section 104(g)(1)
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: By financing pilot programs, to substantially enhance the proficiency of
personnel engaged in the operations and maintenance of treatment works and related
activities.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Assistance supports the allowable direct cost
expenditures incidental to program performance and allocable portions of indirect costs in
accordance with applicable OMB Circular.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State agencies or the designated organizations of the States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Marianas, America
Samoa, the Trust Territories, and Native American Indian Tribes. The Indian Health Service
has provided technical assistance to the Native American Indian Tribes. Additionally, a "not
for profit institution" may also apply for funding if acting as a designated organization of the
State.
Beneficiary Eligibility: An activity which contributes to O&M improvements at
publicly-owned treatment works, including pollution prevention activities, may be funded.
Legislative history supports using appropriations for on-site O&M technical assistance to the
small sized publicly owned treatment work (POTWs) of less than 5 million gallons per day
(MGD) of wastewater flow, since many of these POTWs are exhibiting performance
problems and do not have readily available consultant" s technical assistance like those of the
larger POTWs.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with applicable
OMB Circular No. A-87 Cost Principles for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Discussion with the applicable Regional
Headquarters' wastewater management program offices is advised. The standard EPA
application assistance forms must be used for this program.
71
-------
Application Procedure: This program is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular
No: A-102 Uniform Administration Requirements for Grant- in-Aid to State and Local
Government. Request for application forms and completed applications must be submitted 4e
the applicable Regional or Headquarters Grants Administration office. Applications must
meet the requirements of the grant regulations and must be reviewed and approved by the
appropriate Regional or Headquarters' waste management program office prior to approval
by the Grants office. The review must include an administrative and technical evaluation to
determine adequacy, merit, and relevance of the proposal.
Award Procedure: If the pilot program proposed for funding is not a training
program or a research and development program then the application is not subject to an
"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs."
Deadlines: Historically, annual fiscal year funds have been appropriated by
Congress, and are generally available in January to the Headquarters wastewater management
program office so that the program office can fund applicants before the end of the fiscal
year. Applicants should ensure that its application and reviews meet this funding deadline.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Generally, 90 days after the grant application
is received by EPA.
Appeals: Procedures for appeals are outlined in General Grant Regulations, 40 CFR -
Part 31 Subpart F.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Generally 25 percent in kind service/goods or
matching funds is required however, a 5 percent matching fund may be appropriate in special
cases.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants may be awarded for a project
period not to exceed three years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly progress and final reports, annual expenditure reports, and other
reports as specified by the Assistance Agreement must be provided to the appropriate
Regional or Headquarters wastewater management program office.
Audits: Assistance Agreements are subject to inspections and audit by representatives
of the Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative.
72
-------
Periodic audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management
and internal control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements in
accordance with OMB Circular A-128 Audits for State and Local Governments, or in
accordance with the applicable Federal laws and regulations governing the assistance
agreement.
Records: Financial records and records which substantiate the reasonable and
allocable charges must be available to personnel authorized to examine EPA grant accounts.
All records must be maintained for three years from the date of submission of the annual
financial status reports. If questions arise, related records must be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0103-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $2,000,000 FY 95 est $2,000,000 and FY 96 est
$1,630,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: A State receives approximately
$35,000 to provide funds to on-site technical assistance providers.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Congress has appropriated over $28,000,000 under
the authority of Section 104(g)(1) between fiscal years 1982 and 1994. The progranTs "Ten
Year Report", identified that as of September 1992, 80 percent of the 4,000 POTWS had
achieved significant improvements in the operations and maintenance. There are over 15,000
publicly owned treatment works in the nation.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Charles Conway, EPA, Region I (WCM), One Congress
Street, Boston, MA 02203. Telephone: (617) 565-3517. John Mello, EPA, Region II
(2WM), 26 Fenteral Plaza, New York, NY 10278. Telephone: (212) 264-8349. Jim Kern,
EPA, Region Hi (3WM23), 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Telephone:
(215) 597-3423. Jim Adcock, EPA, Region IV (4WMD-MF), 345 Courtland Street, N.E.,
Atlanta, GA 30365. Telephone: (404) 347-6543. Russell Martin, EPA, Region V
(5WCT-15J), 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604. Telephone: (312) 886-0268.
Tom Reich, EPA, Region VI (6W-MT), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202. Telephone:
(214) 655-7169. Dan Rodriguez, EPA, Region VII (WMMF), 726 Minnesota Avenue,
Kansas, KS 66101. Telephone: (913) 551-7433. Pauline Afshar, EPA, Region VEH
(8WM-MF), 999 18th Street, Denver, CO 80202. Telephone: (303) 293-1169. Angela Ivey,
EPA, Region IX (W-2), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Telephone: (415)
744-1938. Clarence Oilman, EPA, Region X (WD-125), 1200 6th Street, Seattle, WA
98101. Telqjhone: (206) 553-2887.
73
-------
Headquarters Office: Richard Barber, Office of Wastewater Management, Municipal
Support Division (4204), 401 M St SW, Washington, DC 2C4610. Telephone: (202)
260-5823.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: The "Ten Year Report", established that as of
September 1992, 4,608 plants had been assisted and 80 percent had achieved significant
improvements in the operations and maintenance. The $5,000 Federal expenses per O&M
improvements was considered to be more cost-effective than litigating to bring a plant into
compliance.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: On-site wastewater O&M technical
applications managed by the Regions are evaluated based on the Headquarters wastewater
program office" s annual guidance. Other pilot program proposals will be considered by the
Regional and Headquarters wastewater program office base on the merits of the proposal.
Project objectives and requirements for applicants for other pilot project funding will be
negotiated on a case-by-case basis.
74
-------
66.500
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION-
CONSOLIDATED RESEARCH
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended, Public Law 95-95, 42 U.S.C.
7401 et seq.; Clean Water Act, as amended Public Law 95-217, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.;
Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 8001, as amended; Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976, as amended, Public Law 94-580, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.; Safe Drinking Water
Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-523; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, Public Law 92-516, as amended; Public Laws 94-140 and 95-396, 7 U.S.C.
136 et seq.; Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended, Public Law 94-469, 15 U.S.C. 2601
et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To support research to determine the environmental effects and therefore the
control requirements associated with Air Quality, Acid Deposition, Drinking Water, Water
Quality, Hazardous Waste, Toxic Substances and Pesticides to identify, develop and
demonstrate necessary pollution control techniques, and to evaluate the economic and social
consequences of alternative strategies for pollution control of energy systems. To support
research to explore and develop strategies and mechanisms for those in the economic, social,
governmental and environmental systems to use in environmental management.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Available for allowable direct cost expenditures
incident to research performance plus allocable portions of allowable indirect costs of the
institutions, in accordance with the established policies of EPA.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: This program is available to each State, territory and possession
of the U.S., including the District of Columbia, for public and private State universities and
colleges, hospitals, laboratories, State and local government departments other public or
private nonprofit institutions and individuals who have demonstrated unusually high scientific
ability.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and local governments, U.S. territories and possessions,
universities and colleges, hospitals, individuals.
75
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
PreappUcation Coordination: Discussion with the Office of Research and
Development laboratories is advisable for research cooperative agreement application. No
preapplication assistance is available for research grant applications. An environmental
impact assessment is required for this program. An applicant should consult the office or
official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on
the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has
selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Request for application forms and completed applications
must be submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency, Grants Administration Division,
PM 216, Washington, DC 20460.
Award Procedure: Each application shall be subjected to administrative evaluation to
determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and to program
evaluation; technical and extramural review determines the merit and relevance of the
project.
Deadlines: None.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 180 days.
Appeals: Contact your local EPA office.
Renewals: None. Standard grant application should be prepared and submitted which
Will be reviewed in the same manner as a new application and will compete for available
funds.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of 5 percent cost sharing is
required.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants normally funded on a 12-month
basis (yearly). Total approved project period may not exceed five years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly interims and final progress, expenditure, equipment and invention
reports.
76
-------
Audits: Giants are subject to inspections and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative. Federal
audits will be made to ensure that funds have been applied efficiently, economically, and
|effectively. Periodic audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial
management and internal control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other
agreements. State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or
more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local
governments that receive between $25,000 and S 100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall
have an audit made in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs
in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including ail documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until three years
from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still remain, such as
those raised as a result of audit, related records should be retained until the matter is
completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-010741-304.
Obligations: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements) FY 92 S70,843;875; FY 93 est
$79,505,394; and FY 94 est S72,075,494.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: FY 92) S 15,000 to S2,000,000;"
S227,334. (FY 93 est) S44,977 to S500,000; S158.821. (FY 94 est) S227,334.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Individuals are encouraged to communicate with the
appropriate EPA Regional Office.
Headquarters Office: For information on grant applications and procedures, contact
Environmental Protection Agency, Grants Administration Division, PM 216, Washington,
DC 20460. For program information, contact Director, Research Grants Staff, RD675,
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-7473.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: None.
77
-------
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: A proposal is judged for (A) scientific merit
in terms of: (1) strengths and weaknesses of the project; (2) adequacy of overall project
design; (3) competency of proposed staff; (4) suitability of applicant's available resources;
(5) appropriateness of the proposed project period and budget; and (6) probability that the"
project will accomplish stated objectives; and for (B) program interest in terms of: (1) the
need for the proposed research; and (2) relationship to objective(s) in an approved work plan.
78
-------
66.600
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
CONSOLIDATED GRANTS-PROGRAM SUPPORT
(Consolidated Program Support Grants)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended, Public Law 95-95, 42 U.S.C.
7401 et seq.; Clean Water Act, as amended, Public Law 95-217, Public Law 97-117; Water
Quality Act of 1987, Public Law 100-4, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, Public Law
94-580, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Public
Law 92-516, as amended; Public Laws 94-140 and 95-396, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; Safe
Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1986, Public Law 99-339, 42 U.S.C. 300(f) et seq.;
Safe Drinking Water Art of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-523.
OBJECTIVES: The consolidated program support grant is an alternative assistance delivery
mechanism which allows a State or local agency responsible for continuing pollution control
programs to develop an integrated approach to pollution control. An agency eligible for
assistance for two or more pollution control programs may consolidate its assistance requests
into a single application and receive a single consolidated award in an effort to reduce
administrative and application costs. The consolidated grants program does not represent
funding in addition to grants provided under individual authorities, but merely represents the
amount of consolidation taking place within the Agency's total grant appropriations.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Formula Grants.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Any State or local agency eligible to receive and administer
funds for more than one pollution control program.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and local agencies.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplication communications should be directed to the
appropriate EPA Regional Administrator. Deviations from procedures and requirements of
EPA assistance regulations which impede the development and administration of a
consolidated grant may be approved by the Director, Grants Administration Division in EPA
Headquarters. The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal agency. An
applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his
79
-------
or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying
for assistance, if the State has selected the program for revisw.
Application Procedure: The application should be submitted to the appropriate EPX
Regional Office.
Award Procedure: States will be notified of Federal assistance awards through the
Federal Assistance Awards Data System (FAADS).
Deadlines: Sixty days before beginning of proposed budget period.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Up to 90 days.
Appeals: Contact your regional/local EPA office.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Assistance is usually awarded for a one-year
period.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Progress reporting by the State or local agency and performance monitoring
by EPA will be the minimum necessary for sound program management. The minimum may
vary from agency to agency depending upon the specific agency's demonstrated management
abilities. There should be at least one progress report midway through the budget period.
This may be either written or unwritten at the discretion of the Regional Office. A financial
status report is required within 90 days of the end of the budget period.
Audits: State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or
more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local
governments that receive between S25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall
have an audit made in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs
in which they participate.
Records: All records including documents to support entries on accounting records
and to substantiate charges to each grant must be kept available to personnel authorized to
examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years from the date
of submission of the annual financial status report. If any litigation, claim or audit is started
before the end of the three-year period, the records must be retained until the litigations,
claims or audit findings have been resolved.
80
-------
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-01-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 $45,471,000; FY 93 est $46,500,000; and FY 94 est -
S44,400,000. (Note that these amounts do not represent additional appropriations, but levels
of consolidated effort within Agency's total grant appropriation.)
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: FY 92 range of assistance: $39,000 to
S5,450,000. Average assistance: S927,979.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office.
Headquarters Office: Richard Mitchell, Grants Administration Division, PM 216F,
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-6077 and
headquarters offices listed for applicable programs.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Projects have been funded which combined as few
as two of the eligible pollution control programs and as many as four.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Applications are approved if funds are
available.
81
-------
66.604
environmental justice grants to small community groups
OBJECTIVES: To provide financial assistance to grass-roots community- based groups to
support projects to design, demonstrate or disseminate practices, methods or techniques
related to environmental justice. Specifically, EPA will grant funding assistance to be used
for I. environ mental justice education and awareness programs; 2. environmental Justice
Programs (for example reforestation and pollution prevention programs); 3. technical
assistance in gathering anc^ interpreting existing environmental justice data, and; 4. technical
assistance to access available public information.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds shall be used to establish an education and
training program which shall include, at a minimum: 1. design, demonstration, or
dissemination of environmental justice curricula, including development of education tools
and materials; 2. design and demonstration of field methods, practices, and techniques,
including assessment of environmental and ecological conditions and analysis of
environmental and pollution problems; 3. projects to understand, assess or improve a specific
local environmental issue or a specific environmental problem; 4. provision of training or
related education for teachers, faculty, or related personnel in a specific geographic area or
region. Priority will be given to those projects which will develop: 1. an environmental
education practice, method, or technique which may have wide application; 2. an
environmental education practice, method, or technique which addresses skill or scientific
field in environmental Justice areas; an environmental educauon practice, method, or
technique which addresses an environmental issue. No funds made available for this program
shall be used for the acquisition of real property (including building) or the construction or
substantial modification of any building. Grant funds also are not available for use in
underwriting legal actions, including the preparation of court testimony and hiring of expert
witnesses.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Community-based grass root organization, other incorporatable
nonprofit organizations and Tribal Governments are eligible. Individuals may have their
organizations, institutions, government or association apply. Organizations must be
incorporated to receive funds.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Applications describing the planned program, the means
for executing |he program, and preliminary budget information must be submitted to the EPA
Regional Environmental Justice Offices.
Application Procedure: Potential applicants are to submit a preproposal to their
82
-------
respective Environmental Justice Office postmark by February 4, 1995.
Award Procedure: Applications must be submitted to the respective Regional
Environmental Justice Offices. This program is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular
No. A-110. An entity must comply with the State's intergovernmental review process. See 4U
CFR Pan 29.
Deadlines: For fiscal year 1995, the pre-application must be postmarked by February
4, 1995. Applicants selected for award will be notified and requested to furnish additional
information, if needed. EPA plans to award grants by July I, 1995.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: None.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Recipients of grants are expected to submit final reports for EPA approval
prior to receipt of the balance of grant funds.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Obligations: FY 93 $0; FY 94 est $507,000; and FY 95 est ,1,000,000. Individual
grants awarded under this program are not to exceed $10,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Fiscal year 1994 was the first year of the program.
The deadline for pre-applications was February 4, 1994. Seventy-one grants were awarded
with over $507,000 provided to community based nonprofit organizations and Tribal
governments.
83
-------
66.700
CONSOLIDATED PESTICIDE COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE
ASSURANCE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), Section
23, as amended, Public Law 92-516, as amended Public Laws 94-140 and 95-396, 7 U.S.C.
136 et seq.
OBJECTIVES:" To (a) assist States, territories and possessions of the U.S. including the
District of Columbia, and Indian Tribes in developing and maintaining comprehensive
pesticide programs that address all aspects of pesticide enforcement, and special pesticide
initiatives (b) sponsor cooperative surveillance, monitoring and analytical procedures (c)
encourage regulatory activities within the States.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Available for costs specifically incurred in purchasing
inspection supplies and equipment reimbursing State travel and per diem expenses associated
with the performance of grant outputs purchasing essential laboratory equipment and supplies
paying salaries for personnel performing inspections, analytical and/or managerial functions
related to grant activities, and for administrative costs associated with the performance of
grant outputs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State agencies having pesticide compliance program
responsibilities in each State, territory and possession of the U.S., including the District of
Columbia, and Indian Tribes.
Beneficiary Eligibility: States, Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments,
U.S. Territories and the District of Columbia.
Credentials/Documentation: The application must supply evidence of legal authority
to conduct pesticide compliance activities contemplated under the grant and a workable
program officially adopted for the agency. Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Discussions or informal meetings with Regional
program office concerning program preparation are advisable. Prior to approval of any
grants, the official State Pesticides Regulatory Agency must coordinate local pesticide
84
-------
enforcement efforts. The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and
required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program. This program is
eligible for coverage under E.0.12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs."
An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in"*"
his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in
applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: Requests for application form and completed applications
should be submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional Office (see Appendix IV of the
Catalog). The enforcement program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No.
A-110.
Award Procedure: Each application shall be subjected to administrative coordination
to determine adequacy in relation to grant regulations, and to technical and program
evaluation to determine merit and relevancy of the project. States will be notified of Federal
Assistance Awards through the Federal Assistance Awards Data System (FAADS).
Deadlines: Applications due sixty days prior to the beginning of the budget period,
normally August 1.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 60 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart F.
Renewals: Applicants must reapply.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Annual guidance requires a minimum of 15
percent cost sharing.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Projects are normally funded for a
12-month period. Payments will be on an advance letter of credit or reimbursement basis
recipient must request the initial advance payment on SF 270, Request for Advance or
Reimbursement.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: As requested in the Annual Program Guidance for inclusion in the grant
award quarterly with mid-year and year-end evaluations.
Audits: Cooperative Agreements are subject to inspection and audit by
representatives of the Comptroller General of the U.S. EPA or any authorized representative.
Periodic audits should be made as part of the recipient "s system of financial management and
85
-------
internal control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance
with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128. "Audits of State and Local Governments,"
State and local governments that receive financul assistance of $100,000 or more within the
State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that
receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State"s fiscal year shall have an audit
made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance with Federal laws and
regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each cooperative agreement must be kept available to
personnel authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for
three years from the date of the submission of the annual financial status report or longer if
questions still remain, such as those raised as a result of audit.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) Enforcement: FY 94 $16,124,600 FY 95 est $16,135,800 and
FY 96 est $16,133,600.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: States $22,300 (territory) to $628,200
av $214,172.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Since August 1994, 69 Pesticide Enforcement grants
have been awarded. Agencies participating in the Federal cooperative agreement program
receive funds to support and strengthen pesticide compliance monitoring, inspection, and
enforcement activities. Typical program activities for enforcement grants, which are
generally common to all cooperative agreements, include inspections and observations at
pesticide application sites to ensure user compliance with label directions and acceptable use
practices, inspections of pesticide products at producing facilities and in the retail
marketplace to ensure industry compliance with registration, classification, and labeling
requirements, and initiation of appropriate enforcement action when violations are detected
including civil and criminal prosecution, stop sale orders, seizures, recalls, and warning
notices. The States will also develop implementation plans for special pesticide initiatives.
States will be responsible for dissemination of information and materials related to these
pesticide initiatives.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in .
86
-------
Headquarters Office: John Neylan, Enforcement Planning Targeting, and Data
Division Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (2222A), EPA, Washington, DC
20460. Telephone: (202) 564-2385.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: State agencies participating in the Federal/State
cooperative agreement program receive funds to support and strengthen their pesticide
compliance programs, including pesticide compliance monitoring, inspection and enforcement
activities as well as special pesticide initiatives activities. Typical program activities, which
are generally common to all cooperative agreements, include inspections and observations at
pesticide application sitesjto ensure user compliance with label directions and acceptable use
practices, inspections of pesticide products at producing facilities and in the retail
marketplace to ensure industry compliance with registration, classification, and labeling
requirements, and initiation of appropriate enforcement action when violations are detected
including civil and criminal prosecution, stop sale orders, seizures, recalls and warning
notices. The special pesticide initiatives are new projects, which include the development of
State management plans for the protection of groundwater and endangered species from
pesticides and development of worker protection programs.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Each application will be reviewed by the
Environmental Protection Agency according to the following criteria: 1) Need: The need
fot the development, improvement and/or maintenance of a comprehensive pesticides
enforcement program within the State that includes enforcement, and new initiative programs
and that addresses existing environmental problems, potential problems, and/or existing
exposed populations related to the use of pesticides. 2) State Pesticide Activity: The relative
amount of pesticide production, formulation and use in a State, and the potential risk to
human health and the environment from pesticide misuse or abase. 3) Long Term Impact:
The potential of the cooperative agreement to have a long-term beneficial impact on human
health and the environment resulting from the comprehensive pesticide program. 4)
Effectiveness of program: The past level and effectiveness of the State pesticide program. 5)
Level of activity as indicated by such factors as numbers of farms and numbers of
applicators. 6) Magnitude of effort needed to accomplish expected outputs and products and
7) Ability to accomplish output goals.
87
-------
66.708
POLLUTION PREVENTION GRANTS PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC
SUBSTANCES, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Pollution Prevention Act of 1990, Section 6605.
OBJECTIVES: To support State and local level pollution prevention programs that address
the reduction of pollutants across all environmental media: air, land, and water.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The Pollution Prevention Grant Program has several
discrete grant programs administered by the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances in the EPA. These programs support the establishment and expansion of State
pollution prevention programs and address various sectors of concern such as industrial
toxics agriculture, energy, transportation, etc. Funds awarded under this grant/cooperative
agreement should be awarded to support innovative pollution prevention programs that
address the transfer of potentially harmful pollutants across all media - air, land, and water.
Such innovative programs should reflect comprehensive and coordinated pollution prevention
planning and implementation efforts. State agencies seeking funding under this grant program
should focus on, for example: Demonstrating the impact of institutionalizing multimedia
pollution prevention as an environmental management priority, establishing prevention goals,
and developing strategies to meet those goals Initiating demonstration projects that support
and test innovative pollution prevention applications and integrate the pollution prevention
ethic within both governmental and non-governmental institutions of the State or region Other
multimedia prevention activities, including but not limited to: Providing direct technical
assistance to businesses for whom lack of information is an impediment to source reduction
and providing training in source reduction techniques collecting and analyzing data to target
outreach and technical assistance opportunities and identifying regulatory and non- regulatory
barriers and incentives pollution prevention. Pollution Prevention Incentives for States
(PPIS): PPIS is intended to build and support State pollution prevention approaches and
methodologies. The grant program is focused on institutionalizing multimedia pollution
prevention as an environmental management priority, establishing prevention goals, providing
direct technical assistance to businesses, conducting outreach, and collecting and analyzing
data. References:
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Congressional appropriations language and the Pollution
Prevention Act of 1990 indicate that these funds should be used to support "State" pollution
prevention efforts. "State" includes the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United
88
-------
States, any agency or instrumentality of a State including State universities and all Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes. Local governments or other political subdivisions of the State are
*" jt instrumentalities of the State and are therefore not eligible to apply directly for funding.
rivate universities, private nonprofit organizations, and other private organizations are also
not eligible to apply directly for funding. However organizations excluded from applying
directly are encouraged to work with eligible State or interstate agencies in developing
pollution prevention proposals and be included as participants in the project. EPA strongly
encourages this type of cooperative arrangement.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Any State, interstate, and local
agency/organization/university, Federally-Recognized Indian Tribes, public nonprofit
organization/institution, profit organization, private organization, and quasi-public nonprofit
organization.
Credentials/Documentation: In cases where applicants are not clearly, by given
name, an instrumentality of the State, the applicant must provide proof that the applicant is
indeed a State or interstate Agency/Organization.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Applicalion Coordination: The Standard Form 424, 424A, and other forms as
provided by the Environmental Protection Agency must be used for this program. Applicants
are subject to the StateHs review. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372
"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs" (and the review requirements of Section
204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act). An applicant should
consult the Office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for
more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance,
if the State has selected the program for review. The single point of contact must notify in
writing, within thirty days of the Federal Register Notice announcing availability of funds,
the Grants Administration Division of the Environmental Protection Agency, whether their
State's official E.O. 12372 process will review applications in this program.
Application Procedure: Requests for information should be made to: Pollution
Prevention Division, MC7409, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W.,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-2237. Completed applications must be
submitted to the EPA Regional Pollution Prevention Programs for consideration for an
award. Applications must meet the requirements of the grant regulations and will be
reviewed to determine relevancy of the proposed project.
Award Procedure: Procedures for awards are outlined in General Grant Regulation
40 CFR Part 30.
Deadlines: Varies according to each EPA Regional Office.
89
-------
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 120 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 30, Subpart L.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Organizations awarded under this program
will be required to contribute at least SO percent of the total cost of their project (in dollars
or in-kind goods/services).
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants are awarded for a project period not
to exceed three years. Funds are released by a letter of credit.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Organizations that are awarded grant/cooperative agreement funds will be
required to submit semi-annual progress reports, during the life of the project, to the EPA
Proj&tt Officer. Each report will summarize funds expended, tasks accomplished, and results
achieved to date. A summary final report will also be required at the end of the project
period. This final report should include a discussion of the prospects for continuation, further
development of the pollution prevention effort, project evaluation and future direction.
Audits: Periodic audits should be made as part of the recipient's system of financial
management and internal control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other
agreements. In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State
and Local Governments", States that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within
the State" s fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State agencies that receive less
than $100,000 within the StateHs fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with
Circular No. A- 128, or in accordance with Federal laws and regulations governing the
programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel authorized
to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained for three years from the date
of submission of the annual financial status report. If questions still remain, such as those
raised as a result of an audit, related records should be retained until the matter is completely
resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
90
-------
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $6,000,000 FY 95 est $7,100,000 and FY 96 est
6,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $20,000 to $200,000 av $100,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During fiscal year 1993, grants totalling
approximately $6,000,000 were awarded under the Pollution Prevention Grant program.
Fifty-two State and Tribal agencies received grant funds through the Pollution Prevention
Incentives for States program.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in .
Headquarters Office: For program information: Pollution Prevention Division,
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, MC7409, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
401 M Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-2237.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: 1) Technical Assistance 2) Data Collection and
dissemination 3) Education for and outreach to business/government/academic personnel 4)
Training 5)environmental auditing 6) Technology transfer 7) Demonstration projects 8)
Integration of Pollution Prevention into State regulatory programs, or combinations thereof.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: The program has National Eligibility
Criteria which include the following: 1) The proposal should seek to build State pollution
prevention capabilities or test, at the State level, innovative pollution prevention approaches
and methodologies 2) Multimedia opportunities and impacts should be identified. A
multimedia pollution prevention program addresses the prevention of pollution across all
environmental media — air, land, and water 3) The proposal should address significant needs
of the State or region. Areas of significant risk reduction are targeted and integrated into
overall pollution prevention goals, objectives, and implementation strategies. Projects are
encouraged to address targeted high risk chemicals identified in the EPA Industrial Toxics
Project outlined in the Pollution Prevention Strategy (February 1991) or in other EPA
voluntary programs such as Green Lights 4) The pollution prevention activities of other
programs or organizations in the State or region should be integrated and leveraged into the
proposed program, as appropriate. Activities funded complement and augment pollution
prevention activities already undertaken by the State 5) Measures of success should be
identified. There is a reasonable expectation for significant accomplishments in pollution
prevention and there is an adequate system planned for measuring progress with
environmental and/or programmatic indicators and 6) Proposals should identify plans for the
long term implementation of a multimedia pollution prevention program beyond the initial
project funding period are identified. Regional specific criteria for selecting grants may also
be available and complement these national eligibility criteria.
91
-------
66.802
SUPERFUND STATE SITE SPECIFIC COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF SOIJD WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, Section 104, Public Law 96-510 Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, as amended, Public Law 99-499, 42
U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To determine level of hazard at sites listed in the CERCLA Information
System (CERCLIS) To undertake remedial planning and remedial implementation actions in
response to releases on the National Priorities List (NPL) contained in the National Oil and
Hazardous Substance Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300) to clean up the hazardous waste sites
that are found to pose the most imminent hazards to human health. To effectively implement
the statutory requirements of CERCLA 121 (f) which mandates substantial and meaningful
State involvement.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The Fund may be used to (a) conduct non-time critical
removal actions (b) perform preliminary assessments, site inspections, remedial
investigations, feasibility studies, and remedial design activities at sites listed in the CERCLA
Information System (CERCLIS) (c) conduct remedial action (i.e., clean up) at uncoptrolled
hazardous waste sites as listed on the National Priorities List (40 CFR 300) (d) support
CERCLA implementation activities and (e) identify Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs),
conduct settlement negotiations, take enforcement actions against PRPs, and oversee PRP
cleanups.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: States (and political subdivisions thereof), Commonwealths,
and U.S. Territories and Possessions, and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments.
Beneficiary Eligibility: States (and political subdivisions tnereof), U.S. Territories,
and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with 40 CFR
35, Subpart O and OMB Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments and other
supporting documentation provided by the Agency.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
92
-------
r Pre-Application Coordination: The standard application forms as furnished by the
Federal agency and required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program.
Consultation and preapphcation conference are recommended. This program is eligible for
coverage under E.O. 1237^, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant
should consult the office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her
State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for
assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Application Procedure: EPA Form SF-424 should be requested from, and the
completed form submitted to, the appropriate EPA Regional Office identified in Appendix IV
of the Catalog. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110.
Award Procedure. Final approval of application and supporting documentation and
o er o awar is ma e y the EPA Regional Administrator unless re-delegated to the
Regional Division Director.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 90 days.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 31, Subpart F.
Renewals. Extensions are available but not guaranteed. The original cooperative
agreemen is amen y using EPA Form 424 and submitting it to the Regional
Administrator. ®
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: None required for pre-NPL activities at any
S1fe °r °r rem . site was privately owned and operated at the time of disposal
of hazardous wastes. Matching requirements: 10 percent State, 90 percent Federal, for
rem a on o y site is privately owned and operated at the time of disposal of
°!!»S/w .. ' 50 percent State, 50 percent Federal, of all response costs if site
was. T .. , ^ °Pera at t*me °f any disposal of hazardous waste. (Note percentage may
vary). Tribal governments are not required, as States are, to share in the costs of Superfund
actions. r
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Funds awarded for duration of project,
SU °- 6 cons^nts ""posed by EPA. Money is released on a draw-down or a letter of
credit basis.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports. Quarterly progress reports, notification of significant developments,
93
-------
property inventory reports, procurement reports, and financial reports are required pursuant
to 40 CFR 35, Subpart O.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128,."Audits of
State and Local Governments," State and local governments that receive financial assistance
of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year.
State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State"s
fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance
with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Record retention requirements of 40 CFR 35, Subpart O, are imposed.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 20-8145-0-7-304.
Obligations: (Grants and/or cooperative agreements) FY 94 $78,900,000 FY 95 est
$100,000,000 and FY 96 est $100,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $30,000 to $700,000 av $522,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1994, all 10 EPA Regional Offices
awarded cooperative agreements to States.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Superfund Regional Administrators.
Headquarters Office: Carolyn Offutt, Chief, State and Local Coordination Branch,
Involvement Section, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, (52036), EPA,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (703) 603-8797.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Preliminary Assessments/Site Inspections,
Remedial Investigation, Feasibility Study, Remedial Design, Remedial Action (i.e., clean
up), PRP searches, RTFs negotiations RD/RA Negotiations, PRP oversight, Non-Time
Critical Removal Actions.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: For pre-NPL activities, including remedial
planning, site must appear on CERCLIS. For remedial planning and implementation, site
must appear on the National Priorities List of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 CFR 300). Each project is examined and selected on a
case-by-case basis based upon site ranking, availability of matching funds from the State,
availability of Trust funds, receipt of application and other criteria as determined by EPA.
94
-------
66.805
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TRUST FUND PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 9003(h)(7), as amended; Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, Public Law 94-580, as amended; Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, as amended, Public Law 99-499, 42
U.S.C. 6901 et seq. Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments—Anyone/general
public—BENEFICIARIES: 22;39
OBJECTIVES: To support State corrective action and enforcement programs that address
releases from underground storage tanks containing petroleum.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Program funds are to be used to provide resources for
the oversight and cleanup of petroleum releases from underground storage tanks (USTs).
States that have entered into cooperative agreements with EPA have the authority to respond
to petroleum releases from USTs using Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) Trust
funds where owners and operators are unknown, unwilling or unable to take corrective
actions themselves. States may also oversee responsible party cleanups. When the Trust
Fund is used, tank owners/operators are liable to the State for costs incurred and are subject
to cost recovery actions. Trust funds provide expertise and assistance to the Regions, States,
and tribal governments in developing and implementing corrective action programs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: State governments that have demonstrated the capability to
undertake effective corrective actions and enforcement activities and that have
entered into a cooperative agreement with EPA describing the State's uses of the Fund, and
Indian tribes via S.8001 grants.
Beneficiary Eligibility: General public and Indian Nations.
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplication coordination with appropriate Regional
office recommended. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12372,
"Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or
95
-------
official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on
the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has
sei ;ted the program for review.
Application Procedures: The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal
agency and required by OMB Circular No. A-102 must be used for this program. This
program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110.
Award Procedure: A cooperative agreement must be signed between EPA and the
State.
Deadlines: None.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 3 to 4 months.
Appeals: As described in 40 CFR Part 31.
Renewals: A renewal or extension of funds is possible.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: For funds awarded after
January 24, 1089, a 10 percent State cost share is required.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The cooperative agreement will place a
time restriction on funds.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly interim, final progress and expenditure reports; program
evaluations and other reports as required by the specific terms of the Agreement.
Audits: Grants are subject to inspections and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or by authorized representative. Periodic
audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal
control to meet terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. In accordance with the
provisions of OMB Circular No. A-128, "Audits of State and Local Governments," State and
local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's
fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Circular No. A-128, or in accordance
with Federal Laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration
96
-------
of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If
"uestions still remain, such as those raised as a result of audit, related records should be
jtained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 20-8153-0-7-304.
Obligations: (Cooperative Agreements) FY 94 $65,447,300; FY 95 $64,550,000;
and FY 96 $58,289,700.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Anticipated: $300,000 to $4,300,000;
$1,500,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: As of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1994, 49
states and six territories have cooperative agreements.
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Guide: Leaking Underground
Storage Tanks Trust Fund. Cooperative Agreement Guidelines.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: See Appendix IV Of the Catalog for list of Underground
Storage Tank Regional Program Manager addresses.
Headquarters Office: Dana S.Tulis, Branch Chief, Operations Branch, Office of
Underground Storage Tanks, EPA, Waterside Mall, 401 M Street, SW., (5403W)
Washington, DC 20460 Telephone: (703) 308-8891.
RELATED PROGRAMS: 66.804, State Underground Storage Tanks Program.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: A State must demonstrate the capability to
carry out an effective program of enforcement and corrective action for UST controlling
petroleum.
97
-------
66.806
SUPERFUND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
GRANTS FOR CITIZEN GROUPS AT PRIORITY
SITES
(Superfund Technical Assistance Grants)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, .Section 117(e), as amended, Public Law 96-510,
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, as amended.
OBJECTIVES: To provide resources for community groups to hire technical advisors who
can assist them in interpreting technical information cone -ning the assessment of potential
hazards and the selection and design of appropriate remedies at sites eligible for clean up
under the Superfund program.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: (a) Activities for which Federal funds may be used:
Federal funds may be used at sites listed or proposed for listing on the NPL to obtain
technical assistance in interpreting information with regard to the nature of the hazard,
remedial investigation and feasibility study, record of decision, selection and construction of
remedial action, operation and maintenance, or removal action, (b) Limitations on the use of
Federal Funds: Federal funds may not be used to develop new information, such as
conducting independent testing and monitoring activities at a sit?. Under CERCLA, as
amended, grant funds also are not available for use in underwriting legal actions, including
the preparation of court testimony and hiring of expert witnesses.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: EPA is authorized to make technical assistance grants (TAG)
available to any qualified group of individuals which may be affected by a release or
threatened release at any Superfund facility. "Affected" individuals are those who can
demonstrate direct effects from the site, such as actual or potential health or economic injury.
The recipient group must incorporate to receive funds.
Beneficiary Eligibility: This program will benefit groups of individuals affected by
Superfund hazardous w ste sites. This may include homeowners, land/property owners, as
well as any other individuals in the general public who live near a site or re otherwise
affected by it.
98
-------
Credentials/Documentation: At the time of the award, recipient must either be
incorporated or demonstrate that it has taken all necessary and appropriate actions to do so.
Recipients must show proof of incorporation no later than the time of the group's first
request for reimbursement for costs incurred.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
PreappUcation Coordination: 1) Groups wishing to apply for a TAG grant must first
submit to EPA a letter of intent. 2) If site work is already underway or scheduled to begin,
EPA will provide formal public notice (including mailings, and meetings) to other interested
parties that applications are being accepted. 3) Competing groups are encouraged to
consolidate and submit a single application. 4) Prior to submitting their application to EPA
(or concurrently), the applicant must submit the application to the State for Intergovernmental
Review which may take up to 60 days. An applicant should consult the office or official
designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the
process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected
the program for review.
Application Procedure: Applicants for technical assistance grants must submit the
following materials. 1) An original and two copies of EPA Form 424-33, "State and Local
Nonconstruction Programs." The primary application must have the original signature of the
Project manager, 2) A budget showing the proposed expenditure ofJfi!nds, and how the funds
and other resources, including the required 20 percent match, will be used to complete the
project. In addition, a more detailed budget is more likely or typically required for the first
budget period. For the puipose of this program, a budget period will be three years; and 3)
Part IV of the grant application, "Applicant Qualification," which should contain a narrative
statement showing compliance with evaluation criteria. 4) Part IV of the grant application
will also be critical for determining a group's eligibility for receiving a grant and their
management capabilities, and is particularly important in determining an award when there
are several competing applications. The SF Technical Assistance Grant HB (March 30,
1990), provides citizens' groups with detailed instructions for preparing part IV of the
application. The HB contains a blank application fonn.
Award Procedure: 1) The EPA Award Official (usually the Regional grants
administration office, which is called the Assistance Administration Unit (AAU). 2) The
AAU then performs an administrative review of the application, to insure that it is complete.
3) The AAU then forwards copies of the application to the Technical Assistance Grant
Review Team for programmatic review. The Team may include the Site Project Officer, the
Remedial Project Manager (RPM), the Community Relations Coordinator (CRC), an AAU
official, and other staff designated by the Regional Administrator. 4) The Technical
Assistance Grant Review Team performs the programmatic or technical review to select the
best proposal for the funding. 5) If the Review Team rejects an application the AAU sends a
rejection letter to the applicant outlining the reasons for rejection, and closes out the official
99
-------
administrative file. 6) If the application is approved, the Review Team sends a funding
recommendation to the AAU. Under no circumstances do the program staff notify the
applicant of a .vard approval. 7) If the application receives administrative and programmatic
approval for runding, the Project Officer then requests that the AAU prepare an assistance —
agreement which is signed by the Regional Administrator. Award offers are not mailed to
the recipient until five working days after the Award Offical signs the agreement (this
restriction does not ajpply to rejection, decrease, or withdrawal acdons). During this five-day
period, various EPA offices (the Office of External Affairs, EPA Headquarters Grants
Operation Branch (GOB), and the Office of Congressional Liaison) must be notified of the
award before any person outside the Federal Government is informed of the decision. 8) The
Project Officer must notify the Administrator in writing through the Office of External
Affairs. 9) The Project Officer must provide written notification to the Office of
Congressional Liaison (OCL) through the Headquaters Grants Operation Branch (GOB) of
the Grants Administration Division. GOB coordinates receipt of award notifications through
an award Notification Control Station. The AAU that processes the award must provide a
copy of page one of the assistance agreement to the award Notification Control Station at
GOB within one working day following signature by the Award Official. 10) The OCL
receives award notification from GOB and notifies the appropriate Congressional delegation
prior to notification of the recipient. This notification process serves oniy as an informational
function and does not require any response from the Congressional delegation. 11) The AAU
forwards a copy of the award document to the Regional Financial Management Office. 12)
At the end of the five-day waiting period, an original and one copy of the assistance
agreement is sent by the AAU to the applicant for signature. The applicant must either sign
and return the agreement to the AAU within three calendar weeks of the date the agreement
is postmarked or request an extension.
Deadlines: There are no fixed deadlines, except in one instance. That is, if EPA
receives an application and the site work has started or will shortly, other applicants are
given 30 days to express interest in being considered.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 4 to 9 weeks.
Appeals: Contact your local regional/local EPA office.
Renewals: Grant deviation requests are made at the end of the budget period and are
based on the January 30, 1990 policy directive which lists criteria for growth and deviation.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: 1) One grant per site, 2) $550,000 maximum,
or the initial grant and 3) 20 percent match (including in-kind contributions).
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Duration of Superfund cleanup activities
(six years on the average).
100
-------
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: 1) Progress reports. Each recipient shall submit quarterly progress reports to
EPA for the technical assistance grant project 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter.
Progress reports shall fully describe in chart or narrative format the progress achieved in
relationship to the approved schedule, budget, and the technical assistance grant project
milestones. Special problems encountered must be explained. 2) Financial status report. Each
recipient shall submit to EPA a financial status report annually, within 90 days of the
anniversary date of the start of the technical assistance grant project, and within 90 days of
the end of the grant budget period and project. A recipient shall submit to the Agency a
financial status report on SF-269 and the appropriate form to the State. 3) Final report. Each
recipient shall submit to EPA a draft of the final report for review no later than 90 days
prior to the
end of the grant project and a final report within 90 days of the end of the project. The
report shall document technical assistance grant project activities over the entire period of the
grant support and shall describe the recipient's achievements with respect to stated technical
assistance grant project purposes and objectives.
Audits: 1) Records and audit-recipient: (a) Each recipient shall keep and preserve full
written financial records accurately disclosing the amount and the disposition of any funds,
whether in cash or in-kind applied to the technical assistance grant project, and shall comply
with the terms and conditions, (b) Such records shall be retained for 10 years from the date
of the final Financial Status Report, or until any audit, litigation, cost-recovery and/or any
disputes initiated before the end of the ten-year retention period are settled, whichever is
longer. A recipient must obtain EPA's prior written approval to destroy records after the
record retention period. 2) Records and audit-contractor(s): (a) The recipient's contractor
shall keep and preserve detailed records in connection with the subagreement, reflecting
acquisition work progress, reports, expenditures, and commitments and indicating their
relationship to established costs and schedules, (b) The recipients shall require their
contractor(s) to keep such full written financial records to adequately establish compliance
with the terms and conditions of the subagreement. Such records shall be retained for three
years from closeout of the subagreement, unless audit, litigation, cost-recovery, and/or any
disputes are initiated before the end of the ten-year retention period. The contractor(s) must
obtain the recipients' written approval before it destroys any records after the retention
period.
Records: EPA (or the State if it is administering the grant) may perform interim
audits of a group's project costs and financial actions and transactions. The Project Officer
may request an audit at any time after the submission of an application, and may conduct a
final audit of the project. If the Agency, as a result of an audit, determines that the group
owes funds to the Federal government, the group will be required to reimburse the Agency
for that amount. The Agency will take appropriate legal and administrative actions to collect
the amount the group owes the Federal government if reimbursement is not made in a timely
manner. The Agency may offset the debt against other funds payable to the group under the
101
-------
assistance agreement. The Federal government also will charge the group a penalty of six
percent of the debt, handling chaises, and interest if it fails to pay within 30 days from the
date of the decision that the debt is owed. The interest rate will be the rate established by the
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification:
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 S3,200,000; FY 93 est S4,098,500; and FY 94 est
$4,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Up to a maximum of $50,000. We
expect most grants awarded prior to the commencement of a remedial investigation to be
$50,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Since the program began on March 24, 1988, 140
awards have been issued by EPA.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Questions may be directed to the EPA Regional Office
serving a particular state.
Headquarters Office: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Mail code:
5203G, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
Contact: Diana Hammer. Telephone: (703) 603-8775.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Each project provides funds to local groups of
citizens active at Superfund clean-up sites to hire independent technical advisors. Citizens are
looking to the advisors to help them understand proposed clean-up remedies, to better
understand the technical problem at the site, and to respond to EPA actions.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: EPA will determine if the group meets
specific administrative and management requirements. EPA will review a description of the
group's history, goals, and plans for using the technical assistance funds. Factors that are
particularly important in this evaluation process include: (1) The group's ability to manage
the grant in compliance with EPA grant and procurement regulations; (2) The degree to
which the applicant groups' members health, economic well- being, and enjoyment of the
environment are adversely affected by a hazardous waste site; (3) The group's ability to
inform others in the community of the information provided by the technical advisor; (4)
Broad representation of affected groups and individuals in the community; (5) Whether the
102
-------
applicant group is incorporated for TAG purposes. In general, a group must demonstrate that
it is aware of the time commitment, resources, and dedication needed to manage successfully
a TAG. Applicant groups should consult "The Superfund TAG Handbook" for detailed
instructions as to how such information should be presented.
103
-------
66.807
SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROGRAM
(SITE)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, Section 311(b), Public Law 96-510; Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, as amended, Public Law 99499.
(Reauthorized in 1990 for 3 more years).
OBJECTIVES: To establish a comprehensive and coordinated Federal program of research,
development and demonstration of the purpose of promoting the development of alternative
and innovative treatment technologies that can be used in response actions-under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA) program and to provide incentives for the development and use of such
technologies.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The demonstration program provides cost sharing
opportunity and assistance to developers of innovative technology at pilot- or full-scale to
reach commercialization through actual field demonstrations z.t uncontrolled hazardous waste
site". The emerging technology program assists developers o: technology at bench-scale in
achieving pilot- scale capability with potential acceptance into the demonstration program.
Technology developers (at pilot- or full-scale) selected for demonstration projects work with
EPA through cooperative agreements. In general, the developer must fund field operations of
the technology while EPA provides complete site preparation and evaluation services.
Assistance for emerging technology projects is available to technology developers (at
bench-scale) through competitive cooperative agreements. The purpose of the Emerging
Technology Program (ETP) is to foster the further development of technologies that are not
yet ready for field demonstration. The goal is to ensure that a steady stream of more
permanent, cost-effective technologies will be ready to be demonstrated in the field, thereby
increasing the number of viable alternatives available for use in Superfund cleanups. The
ETP will deal with innovative technologies for treatment, recycling, separation,
detoxification, destruction, stabilization, and material handling of hazardous wastes. These
emerging technologies will include, but not be limited to, chemical, biological, thermal, and
physical treatment processes. The ETP will provide 2-year funding to technology developers
that take promising bench/laboratoiy-scale technology to the pilot-scale. The ETP will pay up
to $150,000 per year, for a maximum of $300,000 over 2 years, available competitively to
any individual technology developer. In order to obtain second year funding, significant
104
-------
progress must be made during the first year. The first solicitation for ETP occurred in
September 1987.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: This program is available to any person or private sector
developer who has a new or innovative technology for recycling, separation, detoxification,
destruction, stabilization and material handling of hazardous constituents.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Private enterprises and the general public benefit from this
program.
Credentials/Documentation: This program is excluded from coverage under OMB
Circular No. A-87.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: EPA will accept proposals responding to yearly
solicitations in the Commerce Business Daily for emerging technology and demonstration
projects. An applicant should consult with the office or official designated as the single point
of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be
followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review.
Following project award, EPA will coordinate the Intergovernmental Review process.
Application Procedure: Applicants may contact William Frietsch, Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory, US EPA Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
Award Procedure: EPA will select developers from the yearly solicitation.
Technology available for demonstration will be matched with an appropriate site. The
developers and EPA will then enter into a cooperative agreement as noted above. Funding,
coordination and cooperative agreement formulation for emerging technologies will take
place after extensive, competitive review of proposals.
Deadlines: Applications must generally be received by 45 days after the solicitation
Range of Approval/Disapproval'. Time 120 days, or as noted in the solicitation.
Appeals: Contact your regional/local EPA office.
Renewals: In order to obtain second year funding for the ETP, significant progress
must be made during the first year.
105
-------
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: The total Federal funds for any full-scale field
demonstration as defined by SARA is limited to 50 percent of the total cost of the project,
not to exceed $3,000,000 per single project. An applicant must demonstrate that it cannot
obtain private financing on reasonable terms and conditions sufficient to cany out a
demonstration project before additional Federal assistance may be considered, subject to the
priorities of the demonstration project.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The cooperative agreement will include a
mutually agreed upon testing duration and schedule. Assistance is limited to the duration of
the project.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Progress reports by the developers and EPA will be specified in the
cooperative agreements. Monthly reporting may be required regarding the status of
developer-sponsored activities. EPA will provide quarterly status reports on the SITE
Program.
Records: Not applicable.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0107-0-1-999
Obligations: FY 92 S12,493,900; FY 93 est $17,626,00 1; and FY 94 est SI
7,000.000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Emerging Technology Program:
$121,000 to S300,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Requests for assistance should be handled through the
Office of Research and Development, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory. Contact: John
F. Martin, Chief, SITE Demonstration and Evaluation Branch, Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268. Telephone: (513)
569-7696.
Headquarters Office: Richard Nalesnik, Office of Environmental Engineering
Technology Demonstration, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW
(RD-681), Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-2583.
106
-------
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: The Shirco Infrared System was evaluated at two
Superfund sites, i.e., the Peak Oil site in Brandon, Florida, and the Rose Township site in —
Michigan. The Hazcon solidification/stabilization process was evaluated at the Douglassville,
Pennsylvania, Superfund site and the International Waste Technologies in site stabilization
process at a Miami, Florida, PCB site. Terra Vac's in situ vacuum extraction process was
tested in Groveland, Massachusetts. To evaluate the American Combustion burner, waste
from the Stringfellow site in California was brought to the USEPA's Combustion Research
Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas. Demonstration of Weston's thermal desoiption unit was
accomplished at Anderson Development Corporation Superfund site in Andrian, Ml.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Technologies are selected on the following
criteria: 1) destroy the contaminant or significantly reduce the contaminant toxicity; 2) can be
used-on-site: 3) widely applicable to a variety of sites and wastes; 4) offer a high potential
for solving critical problems that seemingly have no solutions; 5) have significantly lower
costs than current methods; 6) have significantly better performance than current methods; 7)
produce emissions effluents, and residues that are easy to manage from environmental cost
and health standpoints; 8) are easy and safe to operate; 9) perceived capability of the
developer to conduct the work; and 10) cost share to be provided by the developer .
107
-------
66.808
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Solid Waste Disposal Act, Section 8001, as amended; Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended; Public Law 94-580, 42 U.S.C. 6901
et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To promote use of integrated solid waste management systems to solve
municipal solid waste generation and management problems at the local, regional and
national levels.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Available for the allowable direct cost expenditures
incident to program performance plus allocable portions of allowable indirect costs of the
institution, in accordance with established EPA policies. Projects can include the following .
types of activities: training, surveys, education materials and programs, studies, and
demonstrations; but assistance to such projects shall not include any element of construction,
or any acquisition of land or interest in land, or any subsidy for the price of recovered
resources. Financial assistance to States, local, regional, and interstate authorities for the
development and implementation of plans approved by the Administrator.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: These funds can be awarded to the following types of nonprofit
entities: public authorities (Federal, State, interstate, intrastate and local), public agencies and
institutions; private agencies, institutions and individuals; and Indian Tribes. Profitmaking
organizations are not eligible.
Beneficiary Eligibility: State and local governments, U.S. territories and possessions,
and interstate agencies.
Credentials/Documentation: None.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Discussion with EPA Hsadquaners or the appropriate
EPA Regional Office is advisable. An applicant should consult the office or official
designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the
108
-------
process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected
i program for review.
Application Procedure: Requests for application forms and submission of completed
applications should be directed to EPA Grants Administration Division (PM-216-F),
Washington, DC 20460, or the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in Appendix IV of the
Catalog.
Award Procedure: Each application shall be subjected to administrative evaluation to
determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and program
evaluation criteria. Technical and extramural review determines the merit and relevance of
the project.
Deadlines: Varies from Region to Region. Contact appropriate Regional Office for
details.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 180 days.
Appeals: Contact your regional/local EPA office.
Renewals: None. A standard grant application should be prepared and submitted,
which will be reviewed in the same manner as a new application.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of 5 percent cost sharing is required.
Length ant Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants will normally be funded on a 12-month basis
(yearly). Total approved project period may not exceed three years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly interim and final progress, expenditure, equipment and invention
reports.
Audits: Grants are subject to inspection and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative. Periodic
audits should be made as part of the recipient's systems of financial management and internal
control to meet the terms and conditions of grants and other agreements. State and local
governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal
year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive between
$25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance
with Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which they participate.
109
-------
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate charges to each grant, must be kept available to personnel
authorized to examine EPA grant accounts. All records must be maintained until expiration^
of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. If questions still
remain, such as those raised during the three year project period as a result of an audit,
related records should be retained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0107-0-1-999
Obligations: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements) FY 92 S3,700,000; FY 93 est
$2,600,000; and FY 94 est S3,300,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: FY 92 S5,000 to S200,000; S 100,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Individuals are encouraged to communicate with the
appropriate EPA Regional Office.
Headquarters Office: For information concerning grant applications and procedures,
contact the Environmental Protection Agency, Grants Administration Division, PM-216,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-9266.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: (1) National Solid Waste Information
Clearinghouse: Provides information to the nation on solid waste management alternatives.
(2) Targeted Media Recycling Outreach: Funded television and radio commercials that
received over S80,000,000 in free airplay. (3) Peer Match Program: Provides technical
assistance to local government by matching local government experts with local governments
requesting assistance. (4) Report on Scrap-Based Manufacturing; funded production of a
report to assist communities in attracting scrap-based manufacturing. (5) Symposium on
Recycled Glass; sponsored the First National symposium on Recycled Glass.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: A proposal is judged for (A) technical merit
in terms of: (1) strengths and weaknesses of the project; (2) adequacy of overall project
design; (3) competency of proposed staff; (4) suitability of applicant's available resources;
(5) appropriateness of the proposed project period and budget; and (6) probability that the
project will accomplish stated objectives; and for (13) program interest in terms of: (1) the
need for the proposed project; and (2) relationship to program objectives.
110
-------
66.810
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS PROGRAM (TAGs)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Sections 10, and 28, Public
Law 94-469, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Innovative Technical Assistance Grants are offered to
improve the ability of States, Tribes and local communities to protect public health and safety
and involve the development of technical assistance or similar materials that could be used
directly or adapted by other States/Tribes or Local Emergency Planning Committees
(LEPCs). Projects which address extremely hazardous substances or high profile chemicals
and/or high risk areas are especially of interest. The grant money may not supplant State or
Tribal funds already being spent. Because these awards are being made under TSCA
authorities, all grant proposals must be related to activities involving chemicals subject to
regulation under TSCA.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Island,
Northern Mariana Islands, and Federally Recognized Indian Tribes.
Beneficiary Eligibility: States, Local Emergency Planning Committees, and local
emergency responders.
Credentials/Documentation: None.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: Discussion with EPA Headquarters is advisable. For
more information, contact the Grants Program Manager, Chemical Emergency Preparedness
and Prevention Office (CEPPO) (5101), EPA, Washington, DC 20460. The standard
application forms as furnished by the Federal agency and required by OMB Circular No.
A-102 must be used for this program. This program is eligible for coverage under E.O.
12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the
office or official designated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more
information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the
State has selected the program for review.
Ill
-------
Application Procedure: States and Indian Tribes must submit the original completed
application package and two copies to EPA Grants Administration Division (PM-216-F),
Washington, DC 20460.
Award Procedure: Grant applications will undergo a two-step review process.
Initially, Regional Office staff will evaluate each application and forward them to CEPPO
with comments'and a recommendation. Based in part on this preliminary Regional screening
process, the final funding decision will be made by a review panel which may include both
CEPPO and Regional Office staff, as well as other Federal agency representatives. EPA
Headquarters will be awarding the grants. The review process will concentrate on choosing
the best project concepts. Once the grant is awarded to the State Emergency Response
Commission (SERC) or Tribal Emergency Response Commission (TERC) or, if required by
State or Tribal procedure, a State or Tribal agency representing the SERC or TERC, with a
co-signature by the SERC chair or tribal chairperson, EPA will monitor the work in progress
and provide project guidance and oversight to the State and Tribes.
Deadlines: Established by annual program guidance.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 180 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula.
States/Tribes must contribute a match of 25 percent of the establishment and operations costs
of the project as described in TSCA Section 28.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants will normally be funded on a 12
month basis. Total approved project period should not exceed two years for a particular
project. A call for letters of intent and applications will be advertised annually via HQ and\or
Regions notifying States and Tribes.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Reports will be required on a quarterly basis to describe applicant" s
progress.
Audits: Not applicable. Records: Not applicable.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
112
-------
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $1,200,000 FY 95 est $1,500,000 and FY 96 est
51,500,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $50,000 to $100,000 av $50,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: During fiscal year 1994, 24 grant awards were
made to States and Indian Tribes for improving LEPC effectiveness, enhancing SERC Title
HI information management, and developing State accidental release prevention programs.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Any inquiries, contact the CEPP Coordinators .
Headquarters Office: LaVonne Johnson, Grant Program Manager, CEPPO/OSWER
(OS-120), EPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-6657.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Automated Emergency Management Information
System: Provides a ready source of emergency information to Federal, State, and local
authorities for the puipose of emergency planning and preparedness Text for Broadcast Press
Releases: Provides two themes, "You Have a Right To Know" and "Hazardous Material
Risks" Educational Videos: Each video describes to the viewer where the specific hazardous
substance may be found in the community and potential business types that would and would
not need to comply Chemical Emergencies and the Students" Right and Need to Know: An
Instructor Guide: Contains material on understanding comprehensive emergency
management programs and the various types of hazards Hazardous Vulnerability Analysis
Plan: Describes the geographic area of the Tribe, the potential hazards facing the Tribe, and
the emergency response capabilities/services available.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: In evaluating State and Tribal applications
for gTants under this program, EPA will consider the following factors: (1) Potential Benefit
to the chosen geographic area, State or Tribe. The projects should build State or Tribal, and
local capabilities. (2) Technical Soundness for addressing the identified problems and
feasibility of implementation. (3) Priority Need must be demonstrated by State or Tribal
applicants for assistance as set forth in TSCA Section 28. Determination of this priority need
will consider, to the extent feasible, the extent to which chemical accidents pose a risk to the
community within the State or Tribe. Risk factors include high population, high industrial
concentration, natural hazards (e.g., earthquake zones), accident history, and existing
preparedness, prevention and response capabilities. EPA will favorably consider grants that
concentrate on reducing the risk in a specific priority risk area. In addition, proposals which
promote environmental justice will be given additional consideration.
113
-------
66.926
INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL GENERAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Environmental General Assistance Program Act of 1992, Public
Law 102-497, Section 11,42 U.S.C. 4368b, as amended, (Public Law 103-155, November
24, 1993)
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: The following are eligible to receive financial assistance: (a) an
Indian tribal government; and (b) an intertribal consortium or consortia. An Indian tribal
government is any tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any
Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation (as defined in or established pursuant
to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. 1601, et seq.), which is recognized
by the U.S.Department of the Interior as eligible for the special services provided by the
United States to Indians because of their status as Indians. A consortium is a partnership
between two or more Indian tribal governments authorized by the governing bodies of those
tribes to apply for and receive assistance under this program.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Obligations: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements) FY 93 $7,500,000; FY 94 est
$8,400,000; and FY 95 est S6,000,000. (Public Law 104-497, Section 11 (h) authorizes S15
million to be appropriated for each fiscal year through 1998.)
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: S20,000 to $170,000; $60,000. (Note:
excludes two congressionally mandated projects of S0.5 million and $1.5 million, and $1
million and S2.5 million for FY 1992-1993, respectively.)
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: This was a pilot program initiated in fiscal year 1990
as the Multi-Media Assistance Program with 5151,000 for two projects with three tribes.
During fiscal year 1991 $1,700,000 of Agency funds were reprogrammed to provide 29
grants to 47 tribes. In fiscal year 1992, 60 new and continuation grants were funded from
S5,200,000 appropriated by Congress, including $2,000,000 for the two Congressional add-
ons. During fiscal year 1993, 100 new and continuation grants were funded from S7,500,000
appropriated, including 53,500,000 for the two Congressional add-ons. During fiscal year
1994, about 120 new and continuation grants were funded from S8,400,000 appropriated.
Funded activities have included environmental inventories, infrastructure and technical
assessment of capability needs, and planning and development activities to establish tribal
environmental programs.
114
-------
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Public Law 102-497, Section 11,
le 42 U.S.C.4368b, as amended by Public Law 103-155, November 24, 1993. The Agency
blished the interim final regulation for program implementation in the Federal Register on
December 2, 1993, 40 CFR Part 35, Indian Tribes: General Assistance Grants for
Environmental Protection Programs; Interim Final Role; 40 CFR Part 31, General
Regulations for Assistance Programs.
115
-------
66.950
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: National Environmental Education Act, Public Law 101-619, Section
5.
OBJECTIVES: To train educational professionals in the development and delivery of
environmental education and training programs and studies.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds shall be used to establish an education and
training program which shall include, at a minimum: 1. classroom training in environmental
education and studies including environmental sciences and theory, educational methods, and
practices, environmental career or occupational education, and topical environmental issues
and problems 2. demonstrations of the design and conduct of environmental fields studies and
assessments 3. development of environmental education programs and curricula, including
programs and curricula to meet the needs of diverse ethnic and cultural groups 4.sponsorship
and management of international exchanges of teachers and other educational professionals
between the United States, Canada, and Mexico involved in environmental programs and
issues 5. maintenance or support of a library of environmental education materials,
information, literature, and technologies, with electronic as well as hard copy accessibility 6.
evaluation and dissemination of environmental education materials, training methods, and
related programs 7. sponsorship of conferences, seminars, and related forums for the
advancement and development of environmental education and training curricula and
materials, including international conferences, seminars, and forums 8. supporting effective
partnerships and networks and the use of distant learning technologies and 9. such other
activities as the Administrator determines to be consistent with the policies of the Act. No
funds made available for this program shall be used for the acquisition of real property
(including buildings) or the construction or substantial modification of any building.
References:
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Institutions of higher education or other institutions which are
nonprofit (or consortia of such institutions).
Beneficiary Eligibility: Education (0-8), education (9-12), education (13+), nonprofit
institutions
116
-------
Credentials/Documentation: Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB
Circular No. A-87 for State and local governments.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Pre-Application Coordination: This program is excluded from coverage under
Executive Order 12372.
Application Procedure: EPA awarded a grant under this section to the University of
Michigan with a 3 year project period. Future funding will depend upon the grantees
performance and the needs of the Environmental Education program. EPA expects to
competitively select a new recipient in fiscal year 1995.
Award Procedure: This program is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular No.
A- 110.
Deadlines: Proposals for FY 95 are due April 28, 1995.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Awards will be made by October 1, 1995.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: EPA shall establish procedures for a careful and detailed review and
evaluation of the environmental education and training program to determine whether the
quality of the program being operated by the grantee warrants continued support.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: The grantee must provide 25 percent
matching funds for the project. The project has no statutory formula.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The training program grant will be for one
year budget period, 3 years project period.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: The grantee must submit quarterly, interim and final progress reports,
expenditure, equipment and invention reports, and other reports as required by the specific
agreement.
Audits: Projects are subject to inspection and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative.
117
-------
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each assistance agreement must be kept available to
personnel authorized to examine EPA assistance accounts. All records must be maintained
until the expiration of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report.
If questions still remain, such as those raised as the result of an audit, related records should
be retained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 68-0108-0-1-304.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 94 $2,000,000 FY 95 est $2,000,000 and FY 96 est
$2,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Not applicable.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Three awards have been made to the University of
Michigan for approximately $1.6, $1.8 and $2.0 million.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact the appropriate EPA Regional Office.
Headquarters Office: Kathleen MacKinnon, Environmental Education Specialist,
Office of Environmental Education, 1707 Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street
SW, Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-3335.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Basis and priorities for selecting proposals
are listed in Section 5 of Public Law 101-619, National Environmental Education Act.
118
-------
66.951
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANTS
(EEG)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: National Environmental Education Act, Public Law 101-619, Section
6.
OBJECTIVES: To support projects to design, demonstrate, or disseminate practices,
methods, or techniques related to environmental education and training.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds shall be used to establish an education and
training program which shall include, at a minimum: 1. design, demonstration, or
dissemination of environmental curricula, including development of educational tools and
materials; 2. design and demonstration of field methods, practices, and techniques, including
assessment of environmental and ecological conditions and analysis of environmental and
pollution problems; 3. projects to understand and assess a specific environmental issue or a
specific environmental problem; 4. provision of training or related education for teachers,
faculty, or related personnel in a specific geographic area or region; and 5. design and
demonstration of projects to foster international cooperation in addressing environmental
issues and problems involving the United States and Canada or Mexico. Priority will be
given to those projects which will develop; 1. a new or significantly improved environmental
education practice, method, or technique; 2. an environmental education practice, method, or
technique which may have wide application; 3. an environmental education practice, method,
or technique which addresses sltill or scientific field identified as a priority in the report
developed pursuant to Section 9 (d) of this Act; and, 4. an environmental education practice,
method, or technique which addresses an environmental issue which, in the judgment of the
Administrator, is of a high priority. Priorities are specified in the Solicitation Notice. No
funds made available for this program shall be used for the acquisition of real property
(including buildings) or the construction or substantial modification of any building.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Local education agency, college or university, State education
agency or environmental agency, not-for-profit organization, or noncommercial educational
broadcasting entity.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Education (0-8), education (9-12), education (13), nonprofit
institutions.
119
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Standard application form SF 424 must be used for this
program.
Application Procedure: Preapplication receipts during the late fail rather than early
winter as was the same in 1993. Potential applicants may submit an application package to
their respective Regional Grants Management Offices for giants $25,000 or less and to the
EPA Headquarters for grants greater than $25,000.
Award Procedure: Giants applications that are for a Federal share of $525,000 or less
are to be submitted to the respective Regional Offices. Grants applications that are for a
Federal share of greater than $25,000 are to be submitted to The Office of Environmental
Education (A107), 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 20460.
Deadlines: For fiscal year 1996, the completed preapplication packages are due in late
fall 1995; the targeted period for the awarding of grants is early spring 1996.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: 120 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: EPA shall establish procedures for a caref j1 and detailed review and
evaluation of the environmental education grants to determine whether the quality of the
program being operated by the grantee warrants continued support.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: Federal funds for any demonstration project
under this section shall not exceed seventy-five percent of the total cost of such project. For
the purposes of this section, the nonfederal share of project costs may be provided by. in-kind
contributions and other noncash support. In cases where the Administrator determines that a
proposed project merits support and cannot be undertaken without a higher rate of Federal
support, the Administrator may approve grants under this section with a matching
requirement other than that specified in this subsection, including full Federal funding. The
project has no statutory formula.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The training program grant may be
requested for a 12 month period. However, flexibility is possible depending upon the nature
of the project. Activities must be completed within the time frame of the budget period.
Concurrent grants to the same organization during the second year are not allowed.
120
-------
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Recipients of grants are-expected to submit final reports for EPA approval
prior to receipt of the balance of grant funds. Recipients of grants greater than'$5,000 may"
be expected to report on quarterly or semiannual progress, as well as final project
completion.
Audits: Projects are subject to inspection and audit by representatives of the
Comptroller General of the United States and EPA or any authorized representative.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to support entries on accounting
records and to substantiate changes to each assistance agreement must be kept available to
personnel authorized to examine EPA assistance accounts. All records must be maintained
until the expiration of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report.
If questions still remain, such as those raised as the result of an audit, related records should
be retained until the matter is completely resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identifications: Obligation (Grants) FY 92 S2,500,000; FY 93 S2,500,000,
and FY' 94 est S3,100,000. Grants under Section 6 for this program are not to exceed
S250,000. Twenty-five percent of all funds obligated under this section in a fiscal year are
for grants of not more than S5,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Not applicable.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact the appropriate EPA Regional . Office listed in
Appendix IV of the Catalog.
Headquarters Office: George Walker, Environmental Education Specialist, Office of
Environmental Education, A-107, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 260-3335.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Sases and priorities for selecting proposals
are listed in Section 6 of Public Law 101-619, National Environmental Education Act.
121
-------
83.530
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
(EMD-RESIDENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, STATE AND
LOCAL PROGRAMS AND SUPPORT, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY
AUTHORIZATION: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.; National Security Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; Defense
Production Act of 1950, as amended, 50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.; Federal Civil Defense
Act of 1950, as amended, 50 U.S.C. App. 2251 et seq.; Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act
of 1977, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To improve emergency management practices among State and local
government managers, and Federal officials as well, in response to emergencies and
disasters. Programs embody the Comprehensive Emergency Management System by unifying
the elements of management common to all emergencies: planning, mitigation, response, and
recovery. Training is conducted through three major curricular areas: Technical Programs,
which includes preparedness, and recovery; technological emergencies (e.g. , chemical spills,
radiation, etc., and natural disasters), Emergency Management Programs which conducts
realistic exercises in simulated, high-stress environments that promote teamwork among
jurisdictions; Executive Development which provides specific management skills for active
practitioners such as leadership, problem solving, planning, resource allocation, etc. After
taking a series of courses, the student may obtain the Professional Development Series
Certificate.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Training.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Acceptance into the specific courses is based on a need
to know the information and how it will be used for the benefit of the community. The
courses are not open to the general public. The primary audience is State and local
government officials.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Individuals who need emergency management training and are
assigned to an emergency management or civil defense position in State or local government.
Beneficiary Eligibility: The students and communities will benefit.
Credentials/Documentation: Individual applicants may be asked to provide
verification of their emergency management role and responsibilities, upon request.
122
-------
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Individuals interested in applying for training at the
Emergency Management Institute should contact their local or State emergency management
office for particular course information and eligibility.
Application Procedure: A General Admission Application, FEMA Fonn 75-5, is
completed and submitted through the local emergency management organization to the State
Emergency Management Director for approval. The approved application is forwarded to the
Regional Training Manager at the appropriate FEMA Regional Office for coordination with
the Support Services Branch at the National Emergency- Training Center in Emmitsburg,
Maryland.
Award Procedure: The application will be reviewed and the individual notified in
writing of his or her acceptance or non-acceptance. Notification is made approximately 45
days prior to the beginning of the class.
Deadlines: Applications for particular classes should be submitted as quickly as
possible"after receipt of the course catalog or announcement for the appropriate time period.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Applications are processed promptly after
receipt and notification is made approximately 45 days prior to the start of the class.
Appeals: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: None.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Indefinite.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: None.
Audits: There may be an evaluation following completion of particular courses to
determine the application of the information and the benefit derived by the community.
Records: Not applicable.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
123
-------
Account Identification: 5841014-1-999.
Obligations: (Direct program expenditure) FY" 94 est S5,472,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance; Not applicable.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: See EMI Catalog for listing of FEMA Regional Offices.
Headquarters Office: National Emergency Training Center, Support Services Branch,
16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727. Telephone: (301) 447-1000.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Individuals must meet individual course
prerequisites and be recommended by their State or local government for training.
124
-------
84.120
MINORITY SCIENCE IMPROVEMENT
(MS IP)
FEDERAL AGENCY: OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POSTSECONDARY
EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
AUTHORIZATION: Higher Education Act of 1965, Title X, Part B, Subpart 1, as
amended, Public Laws 89-329, 99498, and 102-325, 100 Stat. 1561, 20 U.S.C. 1135b,
1135, 1135d.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To assist institutions to improve the quality of preparation of their
students for graduate work or careers in physical and social science; (2) to improve access of
undergraduate minority students to careers in the physical and social sciences, mathematics
and engineering; (3) to improve access for precollege minority students to careers in physical
and social sciences and engineering through precollege enrichment programs conducted
through eligible colleges and universities; and (4) to improve the capability of predominantly
minority institutions for self-assessment, management and evaluation of their physical and
social science programs and dissemination of their results.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grant funds may be used for paying costs necessary for
improving and maintaining high quality science and engineering education programs in
minority postsecondary institutions, including salaries and wages, equipment and instructional
materials and supplies, travel related to the project activities, faculty development, and other
direct and indirect costs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Private and public accredited two and four-year institutions of
higher education whose enrollments are predominantly (50 percent or more) American
Indian; Alaskan Native; Black, not of Hispanic origin; Hispanic (including persons of
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Central or South American origin); Pacific Islander; or
any combination of these or other ethnic minorities who are underrepresented in science and
engineering may apply. Applications may also be submitted by professional, scientific
societies, and all nonprofit accredited colleges and universities which will render a needed
service to a group of MSIP-eligible institutions or provide in-service training for project
directors, scientists or engineers from eligible minority institutions.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Private and public accredited two-and four year institutions of
higher education whose enrollments are predominantly (50 percent or more) American
Indian; Alaskan Native; Black, not of Hispanic origin; Hispanic (including persons of
125
-------
Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Central or South American origin); Pacific Islander; or
any combination of these or other ethnic minorities who are underrepresented in science and
engineering will benefit. Also nonprofit science-oriented organizations, professional scientific
societies, and all nonprofit accredited colleges and universities will benefit.
Credentials/Documentation: Institutions must provide the information necessary to
establish their eligibility for participation in MSEP. The data on enrollment furnished to the
Once for Civil Rights to satisfy requirements for the "Fall Enrollment and Compliance
Report of Institutions of Higher Education" are acceptable. Applications must be signed by
the project director(s), the relevant department head(s),- and by an authorized organizational
official.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: The standard application forms as furnished by the
Federal agency for this program. An applicant should consult the office or official designated
as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State
requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for
review ~
Application Procedure: By submission of a formal application describing the planned
project and proposed amount of the grant.
Award Procedure: Panels of outside experts with knowledge of the fields covered by
the application review all applications. Grants awards are recommended to the Secretary by
the program office, in the order of merit.
Deadlines: Contact your local/ regional EPA office.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From three to six months.
Appeals: The project director may request, in writing, that the program reconsider its
action in declining any application.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: The program suggests that some institutional
contribution be included as part of program support. However, by law, this program has no
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: One to three years. Funds are awarded
annually and disbursed as required.
126
-------
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: The program requires interim reports from directors of projects having
duration of more than one year at the end of each academic year's activities. A substantive
technical report is required upon completion of the project for all funded projects.
Audits: Compliance with standard Department of Education requirements.
Records: Grantees are required to maintain standard educational and financial records.
Records are subject to inspection during the life of the grant and for five years thereafter.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 91-0201-0-1-502
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 $6,000,000; FY 93 est S5,892,000; and FY 94 est
$5,892,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: S19,500 to $467,256; $254,124 for
Institutional; $448,400 for Cooperative; S19,500 for Design Projects, and $55,431 for
Special Projects.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Division of Higher Education Incentive Programs, Office of
Postsecondary Education, Department of Education, Washington, DC 20202-5251. Contact:
Argelia Velez-Rodriguez. Telephone: (202) 260-3261
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: (1) A project is supporting a consortium of two
historically Black institutions to substantially increase the use and effectiveness of computer
assisted instruction (CAI) materials at the cooperating institutions and other minority
institutions nationwide. (2) Another cooperative project is supporting two institutions, a
historically Black college and a non-minority university from the northeast, to develop a
Comprehensive Interfaced Computerized Instructional System for Mathematics, Statistics and
Computer Literacy. (3) A project is supporting a university in South Texas with a
predominantly Mexican-American student population to implement an undergraduate student
research apprenticeship/faculty researcher mentorship program. (4) One project is assisting a
Native American institution to develop eighteen mobile science laboratory experiences to
deliver two basic science courses to students living in the Standing Rock Sioux Indian
reservation. (5) A project is supporting a non-minority university in California to improve a
pre-college enrichment program for minority youngsters.
127
-------
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Decisions are based primarily on the
scientific and educational merits of described activities and conformance with the objectives
of the program. Priority is given to applicants which have not previously received funding
from the Minority Science Improvement Program and to previous grantees with a proven
record of success, as well as to proposals that contribute to achieving balance among projects
with respect to geographic region, academic discipline and project type.
128
-------
93.158
ADOLESCENT HEALTH CENTERS FOR
AMERICAN INDIANS/ALASKA NATIVES
(Adolescent Health Centers)
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Health Service Amendments of 1992, Section 216, Public Law
102-573.
OBJECTIVES: To make financial assistance awards to Indian tribes and tribal and urban
Indian organizations to establish innovative school related and community based adolescent
health centers capable of providing health promotion and disease prevention services to
adolescents.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grants may be used in establishing and operating
programs designed to provide health promotion and disease prevention services to
adolescents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Any federally recognized Indian Tribe, Indian tribal
organization of federally recognized urban Indian organization. Preference is given to
applicants within the following IHS Areas: Aberdeen IHS, Alaska Native Health Service,
Billings IHS, California IHS, and Navajo IHS.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Individuals who are members of an eligible applicant tribe,
band, or group or village and who may be regarded as within the scope of the Indian health
and medical service program, and who are regarded as being Indian by the community in
which they live as evidenced by such Actors tribal membership, enrollment, residence on tax
exempt land, ownership of restricted property, active participation in tribal affairs or other
relevant factors in keeping with general Bureau of Indian Affairs practices in the jurisdiction.
Credentials/Documentation: Certification of Native Indian or Alaskan descent is
required for direct services.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
129
-------
Application Procedure: An IHS Grant Application Kit may be obtained from the
Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and Giants Operations, 12300
Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-5204.
Award Procedure: Grants are made directly by the Indian Health Service to applicant
agency, based on results of competitive review process.
Deadlines: Contact Headquarters Office for application deadlines.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Within 90 days of IHS deadline.
Appeals: Contact your local/ regional EPA office.
Renewals: Project periods are subject initially to 3 years with up to 2 additional years
following successful competitive review.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Not applicable.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Audits: State and local governments that receive between S25,000 and $100,000
within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit.
Records: The comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized
representatives, shall have the right of access to any books, documents, papers, or other
records of a grantee, subgrantee, contractor, or subcontractor, which are pertinent to the
HHS grant, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts and transcripts. Grantees are
required to maintain grant accounting records 3 years after the end of the budget period. If
any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records shall be retained
until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or until the end
of the regular 3-year period, whichever is later.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-03900-1-551.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 S450,000; FY 94 est S450.000; and FY 95 est
$450,000.
130
-------
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: Average award is $50,000 (for grants
competitively awarded).
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, eight new awards were issued. It
is anticipated that these projects will be continued in fiscal years 1994 and 1995.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Grants Management Contract: Ms. Kay Carpenter, Grants
Management Officer, Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and Grants
Operations, Indian Health Service, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human
Services, Twinbrook Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, MD
20852. Telephone: (301) 443-5204. Program Contact: Dr. Richard Kotomori, Chief, Special
Initiatives Branch, Office of Health Programs, Indian Health Service, PHS, DHHS, Parklawn
Building, Room 5A-41, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Telephone: (301)
443-4646.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: New program.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: (1) The apparent capability of the applicant
to organize and manage the proposed project successfully considering the adequacy of staff,
management systems, equipment and facilities; (2) the soundness of the applicant's plan for
conducting the project and for assuring effective utilization of grant funds (3) the adequacy
of the budget in relation to the scope of the project and available funds; and (4) the relative
effectiveness of the applicant's plan to carry out each of the requirements as set forth in the
application.
131
-------
93.225
NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE
AWARDS-HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
TRAINING
FEDERAL AGENCY: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH, PUBLIC
HEALTH SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.
AUTHORIZATION: Public Health Service Act, as amended, Public Law 99-158, 42 U.S.C.
288.
OBJECTIVES: To provide predoctoral and postdoctoral training opportunities in health services
research. Individual fellowships will be awarded directly to applicants for postdoctoral research
training. Domestic institutions will also be awarded grants to enhance predoctoral and
postdoctoral training programs and provide support to trainees selected by them. The purpose of
these awards is to provide fellows and trainees with both academic training and actual experience
in the application of research methods to the systematic analysis and evaluation of the
organization ion, financing, utilization, and delivery of health care services.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Individual fellowships are awarded to applicants seekinp
postdoctoral support for full-time health services research training. An institutional allowance
provided, upon request, to the sponsoring institution for each fellow. Also, research training
grants are awarded to institutions to provide support to trainees selected by the training prognuti
director at the grantee institution. This support is available for predoctoral and postdoctoral
trainees. Tuition and fees are allowable for trainees, and an amount for institutional expenses will
be provided. Indirect costs may be requested at 8 percent of allowable direct costs, or actual
indirect costs, whichever is less. Fellows and trainees who receive support are obligated to meet
payback requirements by an agreement to engage in full-time health services research and/or
related teaching for specified time periods after completion of the training. Discretionary funds
are available.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Domestic public or private nonprofit organizations or institutions
may apply for training grants. The applicant institutions must have or expand training programs
designed to develop competent investigators in the methods and techniques of conducting health
services research. State or local governments and U.S. Territories are eligible. Profit-making
organizations are not eligible. Individual applicants for fellowships must have received a doctc.-al
degree. All persons supported as fellows or trainees must be citizens or non-citizen nationals of
the United States, or have been lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
132
-------
Beneficiary Eligibility: Individuals and public or private nonprofit organizations or
ions, including State or local governments and U.S. Territories, are the beneficiaries of
^.jgram.
Credentials/Documentation: An individual applicant for a fellowship must document
receipt of a doctoral degree and acceptance by an appropriate institutional sponsor. Institutional
applicants for training grants must document their research and training experiences, staff,
curriculum, facilities, and other resources available.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: While there is no program requirement for preapplication,
informal preapplication consultation to prospective applicants is available upon request to the
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), and is recommended.
Application Procedure: Application forms and information about health services research
areas being supported are available from AHCPR.
Award Procedure: Applications are reviewed for scientific merit by a committee including
nonfederal consultants who are selected from appropriate scientific fields. All institutional
training grant applications are also reviewed by the National Advisory Council for Health Care
Policy, Research, and Evaluation. AHCPR considers the recommendations of the review
^—littee, the Council, pro
interest, and the availability of funds in the final selection of grantees. When such decisions
-------
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory; formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Individual fellowship support at the postdoctoral
level is limited to 3 years. Institutional training grants may be awarded for project periods up to 5
years. Awards are made on an annual basis and it is expected that obligations will be made
within the budget period awarded. After awards are issued, funds are released in accordance with
the payment procedure established by the grantee with DHHS, which may be an Electronic
Transfer System or a Monthly Cash Request system.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Annual and final progress reports are required. For institutional training grants, a
final progress report is due at the close of the project period. Annual financial status reports are
also required for Institutional National Research Service Awards. These Financial Status Reports
must be submitted within 90 days after the close of each budget period. Annual reports of
activities for tracking payback provisions are required of all fellows and trainees upon termination
of support.
Audits-:Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Records: Financial records, including all documents to substantiate charges, must be
maintained. Records may be destroyed 3 years after the end of the budget period if an audit
occurs and is completed by that time; if an audit has not occurred, records must be retained uit
3 years following the audit; or, if an audit is underway, until the resolution of audit findings.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-1700-0-1-552.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 92 $1,731,000; FY 93 est 51,745,000; and FY 94 est
$1,745,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: (Individuals) $20,000 to $33,000; $28,000.
(Institutions) $160,000 to S260,000, $200,000.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
134
-------
Headquarters Office: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), Public
h Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Suite 601, Executive Office Center,
East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852. Program and Grants Management Contact:
Ralph Sloat, Grants Management Officer. Telephone: (301) 594-1447.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Support is provided for training in the following areas:
epidemiology, biostatistics, geriatrics, health administration and public health, medical
information sciences, health policy and management, and organizational behavior.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: For Individual fellowship applications, the
following review criteria will be used: (1) the applicant's past academic and research
accomplishments; (2) research goals; (3) research training proposed; (4) qualifications of the
sponsor; (5) appropriatenessof training environment; and (preference reports. For Institutional
training grant applications, the following review criteria will be used: (1) goals of the proposed
training and probability of achievement; (2) substantive content,including courses offered; (3)
qualifications and responsibilies of program director and faculty; (4) ability to recruit trainees; (5)
extent of institutional participation through provision of necessary space, curriculum time,
financial support, and appropriate facilities; (6) documented cooperation of related agencies in
providing research experience; (7) proposed number of students; (8) methods for monitoring and
evaluating trainees; and (9) reasonableness of budget. In all cases, AHCPR will consider the
recommendations of the review committee, the Council program interests, and availability of
funds in making the final selection of grantees.
135
-------
93.612
NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS
FEDERAL AGENCY: ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Native American Programs Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-644;
Older Americans Act Amendments of 1987, Title V, Public Law 100-175; Indian Reorganization
Act Amendments, Section 215, Public Law 100;581; Older Americans Act Amendments of 1992,
Tide Vm, Public Law 102-375; 42 U.S.C. 2991 et seq.
OBJECTIVES: To provide financial assistance, training and technical assistance, and research,
demonstration and evaluation activities to public and private nonprofit organizations including
Indian Tribes, urban Indian centers, Alaska Native villages, Native Hawaiian organizations, rural
off-reservation groups, and Native American Pacific Island groups for the development and
implementation of social and economic development strategies that promote self-sufficiency.
These projects are expected to result in improved social and economic conditions of Native
Americans within their communities and to increase the effectiveness of Indian Tribes and Native
American organizations in meeting their economic and social goals.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants (Contracts); Direct Loans.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grants may be used for such purposes as, but not limited
to: (1) Governance Projects which assist tribal and village governments, Native American
institutions, and local leadership to exercise local control and decision-making over their
resources; (2) Economic Development Projects, which promote the long term mobilization and
management of economic resources necessary to achieve a diversified economy; and (3) Social
Development Projects which support local access to, control of, and coordination of services and
programs for the social benefit of community members. Funds may be used for Financial
Assistance Grants; Training and Technical Assistance; and Research, Demonstration and
Evaluation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Public and private nonprofit agencies, including but not limited to,
governing bodies of Indian tribes on Federal and State reservations, Alaska Native villages and
regional corporations established by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, such public and
nonprofit private agencies serving Native Hawaiians, Indian and Alaska Native organizations in
urban or rural nonreservation areas, and Native American Pacific Islanders (American Samoan
Natives, and indigenous peoples of Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana and the
Republic of Palau).
Beneficiary Eligibility: American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Native
American Pacific Islanders.
136
-------
Credentials/Documentation: Nonprofit organizations which have not previously received
program support must submit proof of nonprofit status.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: None
Application Procedure: Information regarding the availability of grant funds will be
published from time to time in the Federal Register as Program Announcements, which will
provide details on program objectives for which applications are being solicited and other
application requirements. The Administration for Native Americans will provide each applicant
agency with the appropriate forms for the application for Federal Assistance and instructions for
applying for grants from Administration for Children and Families programs. Applications should
be submitted to Administration for Children and Families, Discretionary Grants Management
Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 341-F.2, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201.
Award Procedure: All funds are awarded directly to the grantees.
Deadlines: Each program announcement specifies the due dates for submission of
applications.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Applicants will receive notice of
'al/disapproval approximately 120 days after receipt of application.
Appeals: Contact your regional/local EPA office.
Renewals: Not applicable.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula for
distribution of funds.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grantees may apply for competitive continuation
support within a project period of 1 to 3 years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Semi-Annual Financial Status Reports, Report of Federal Cash Transactions,
Project Progress Reports, and an annual Evaluation Report are required.
Audits: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
137
-------
Records: Financial records, supporting documents and all other dated records pertinent to
grants must be maintained for.a period of 3 years. If an audit is not completed by the end of the
3 year period, or if audit findings have not been resolved, records shall be retained until
resolution of the audit findings.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-153641-506.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $34,507,000; FY 94 est $38,627,000; and FY 95 est
$38,627,000. (Revolving Loan Fund) FY 93 $992,000; FY 94 est $1,000,000; and FY 95 est
$1,000,000 (NOTE: The funds in this program are also available for program contracts. The
amounts which can be used for such contracts cannot be predetermined.)
Range and Average of Financial Assistance (Tribal Grants): $50,000 to $1,200,000;
$125,000. (Urban Grants) $30,000 to $210,000; $100,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: The program currently serves all Native Americans.
Financial assistance is provided for Native American community projects, research, evaluation,
technical assistance and training. Cooperative initiatives with other Federal agencies have been
undertaken in the areas of employment, energy, social services, environmental and occupational
health, education, and housing. During the past four years, the Native Hawaiian Revolving Loan
Fund has disbursed 143 small business loans totalling 55.8 million.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Administration for Native Americans, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 348-F, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201
Contact: Sharon McCully, Director, Planning and Support Staff. Telephone: (202) 690-5780.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: (1) Improved Governance Capabilities; (2) Native
American social development projects; and (3) Native American economic development projects.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Specific criteria for selecting proposals for
funding are stated in each program announcement. In general, proposals are judged on the basis
of relevance to program objectives as stated in the program announcement, project viability,
community support, reasonable cost estimates, and qualifications of applicant organization and
personnel.
138
-------
93.905
INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Health Care Improvement Act, Section 208, Public Law 94-437, as
amended; 42 U.S.C. 1621g.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct research and developmental activities in areas of Indian health care
which further the performance of health responsibilities of the Indian Health Service.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: (1) basic epidemiology, risk factors and/or preventive
strategies involving chronic diseases; (2) understanding of behavioral changes and their
acceptance in Indian communities, regarding health promotion/disease prevention strategies which
rely on individual, family, or community acceptance of responsibility for improving health status;
(3) etiology, morbidity, adjunctive treatment alternatives or preventive strategies for dealing with
alcohol or substance abuse, mental health problems and their impact on non-afflicted family
members; (4) functional status, burden of illness or social support systems for health care of the
elderly, and estimates of demand for extended care services; (5) involvement of professional
~ ng in reproductive health care, infant care, patient education, compliance with self-care, and
ifluence of social support systems on the behavior of pregnant women, as well as questions
or job-satisfaction in nursing; (6)intervention alternatives for family dysfunction problems such as
interpersonal violence, alcohol or drug abuse, poor school or work performance, mental health
problems and inappropriate utilization of health services; (7) alternative configurations for the
delivery of health care services, including innovative approaches to provide staffing, funding
mechanisms, flexible benefits packages and/or more effective use of health care facilities; (8)
prevention, treatment and prioritization of oral health problems among the Al/AN people, with
particular interest in consumer attitudes and behavioral variables; and (9) other areas of concern
within the function al health care responsibilities of the Indian Health Service.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: There are two groups of eligible applicants: (1)
Federally-recognized Indian tribes and tribal organizations which are contracting with the Indian
Health Service; and (2) Indian Health Service components, including Service units and area
offices.
Beneficiary Eligibility: American Indian Tribes and Alaska Natives.
Credentials/Documentation: If the applicant is a tribe or tribal organization, support of
_the project must be evidenced by signature of the Tribal Chairperson or designee. If more than
139
-------
one tribe is affected, it is urged that letters of support be provided. If the applicant is an Indian
Health Service component, resolutions from tribes involved in the research and letter(s) of
support from Indian Health Service unit(s) affected by the proposed research must be submitted.
An Indian Health Service component must obtain clearance signatures from the Area Contracting
Officer if any purchasing, contracting, or consultant hiring actions are requested in the
project.Applicants must pro vide documentation of the process which will be established to
protect the confidentiality of data collected and the privacy of patients to include protection of
patient records.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplications are required as specifically requested in the
program announcement.An environmental impact statement is not required. Anyone interested in
submitting
an application under this program is encouraged to contact Ms. Donna Pexa, Program
Coordinator, for technical assistance. Telephone: (602) 295-2503. Application Procedure: The
standard application forms, as furnished by the Public Health Service and approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) must be used for this program. Application kits may be
obtained from the Indian Health Service Head quarters, Grants Management Branch. Telephone:
(301) 443-5204.
Award Procedure: Grants are awarded on a competitive basis with a thorough, objective
review to determine selection. Ineligible or in complete applications will be returned to applicants
without review. Applications are processed and grants are awarded by Indian Health Service
Headquarters.
Deadlines: For specific information on the application deadline, contact the Grants
Management Branch on (301) 443-5204.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Approximately 180 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Projects are required to resubmit and recompute each year for renewal of
awards.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Assistance is normally available for a 1-year
period. Expenditure of funding is limited by language in the annual appropriations legislation.
Payment of grant funds to tribal recipients is made through the Department of Health and Human
140
-------
Services (DHHS) Payment Management System (PMS). Information will be forwarded to
;es regarding the process of obtaining funds.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Quarterly and final program progress reports will be required. A final status
report is also required. Indian Health Service components shall comply with the same terms and
conditions applicable to nonfederal grantees.
Audits: State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more
within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year.
Records: Grantees are required to maintain grant accounting records for three years after
the end of a budget period. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving
the records has been started before the expiration of the three year period, the records shall be
retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or until the
end of the regular three year period, whichever is later.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-03904 1-551.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $400,000; FY 94 est $325,000; and FY 95 est $400,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $9,000 to $50,000; $30,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, 12 grants were issued. An estimated
11 grants will be issued in fiscal year 1994, eight new and three continuing grants; and
approximately 30 grants will be awarded in fiscal year 1995. This number includes both those to
tribes and tribal organizations and to Indian Health Service components.
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Program Contact: ms. uonna Pexa, Program Coordinator, IHS
Research ProgTam/OHPRD, 7900 South I. Stock Road, Tucson, AZ 85746 9352. Telephone:
(602) 295-2503. Grants Management Contact: Ms. Kay Caipentier, Grants Management Branch,
Division of Acquisition and Grants Operations, Indian Health Service, Public Health Service,
Twinbrooks Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852.
Telephone: (301) 443-5204.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
141
-------
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: The proposals win undergo a dual review
process. In the initial review stage, the technical review committee reviews an applications based
upon the following criteria: (I) specific aims; (2) background in research literature; (3) progress
report (for competing continuation studies only); (4) research design and methods to be used; (5)
data sources, management, quality control, and analysis; (6) originality; (7) importance of the
health problem(s) for the community(ies) service units involved; (8) importance of the health
problem(s) for all American Indian and Alaska Native people and the IHS Area; (9) setting of the
study; (10) utility of the product and experience to the community(ies) involved; (11) utility of
the product and experience to the IHS and other American Indian and Alaska Native people; (12)
budget; and (13) key personnel and research team.
142
-------
93.933
RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION
PROJECTS FOR INDIAN HEALTH
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Public Health Service Act, Tide m, Sections 301 and 327, 42 U.S.C.
241, as amended, Public Law 78-410.
OBJECTIVES: To promote improved health care among American Indians and Alaska Natives
through research studies, and demonstration project.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Federal assistance is to be used for the following purposes:
(1) research, analysis, and investigation of a broad range of issues affecting the health of
American, Indians and Alaska Natives; and (2) demonstration project and studies that provide
American Indians/Alaska Natives with impetus and involvement in their health care and that
promote improved health care to Indian people.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Federally recognized Indian tribes; tribal organizations; nonprofit
intertribal organizations; nonprofit urban Indian organizations contracting with the Indian Health
Service under Title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act; public or private nonprofit
health and education entities; and State and local government health agencies. Beneficiary
Eligibility: American Indians/Alaska Natives win be the ultimate beneficiaries of the funded
projects either directly or indirectly depending upon the nature of the project. For example,
those individuals who participate in research studies and receive services will be direct
beneficiaries while those impacted by policy changes resulting from analyses of Indian health care
issues will be indirect beneficiaries.
Credentials/Documentation: Depending upon the nature of the project, letters of support
or tribal resolutions may be required.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Not applicable.
Application Procedure: Information on the sub mission of applications may be obtained
from the Grants Management Officer, Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and
Grants Operations, Suite 100, Twinbrook Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-5204.
143
-------
Award Procedure: After review and approval, a notice of award is prepared and
processed, along with appropriate notification to the public.
Deadlines: Contact the Grants Management Officer, Headquarters Office tor inlormation
regarding application deadline dates.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 90 to 120 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Initial project period of up to 5 years, usually 3 years, with competitive
renewals for periods not to exceed a total project period of 5 years.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: The project period is limited to 5 years or less.
Within the project period, a continuation application must be submitted annually on a
noncompetitive basis for each year of support.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Program progress reports are due on a semiannual basis with the second report
submitted as part of the annual noncompetitive continuation application. A terminal progress
report is due within 90 days after the end of project support. Financial status reports are due
within 90 days after the expiration of each budget period with a final financial status report due
90 days following the end of the project period.
Audits: State and local governments (Indian tribal governments) that receive between
$25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made.
Records: The Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized
representatives shall have the right of access to any books, documents, paper, or other records of
the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor, which are pertinent to the grant, in order to make
audits, examinations, excerpts and transcripts.If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit, or other
action involving the records has been started before the end of the 3-year period, the records
must be retained until completion of the action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or
until the end of the regular 3-year period, whichever is later.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-039041-551.
144
-------
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $994,529; FY 94 est $806,000; and FY 95 est $1,000,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $30,000 to $534,287; $185,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, five projects were funded. In fiscal
year 1994, it is anticipated that three projects will be funded; and in fiscal year 1995, three
projects are expected to be funded.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Not applicable.
Headquarters Office: Program Contact: Mr. Douglas Black, Associate Director, Office of
Tribal Activities, Indian Health Service, Parklawn Building, Room 6A-05, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857. Telephone: (301) 443-1104. Grants Management Contact: Ms. M. Kay
Carpentier, Grants Management Officer, Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition
and Grants Operation's, Indian Health Service, Twinbrook Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook
Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone:(301) 443-5204.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: (1) Salish-Kootenai College, Pablo, Montana, is
developing computer based instructional modules for dental assistants; and (2) Indian
ibilitation, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, is conducting research on suostance abuse relapse
ction through treatment, job training/placement, and aftercare support services.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: The selection criteria are: Statement of
problem(s) requiring solution; need for assistance; results or benefits expected from the project;
approach or soundness of the applicant's plan for conducting the project; key personnel and their
capability to carry out the project; and adequacy of management controls. Consideration will be
given to the demonstrative aspects of the project and the compatibility of the project with the
overall goals and objectives of the Indian Health Service.
145
-------
93.954
TRIBAL RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INTO INDIAN
HEALTH PROGRAMS
(Tribal Recruitment)
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Health Care Improvement Act, Section 110, Public Law 94-437, as
amended, Public Law 100-713 and Public Law 102-573.
OBJECTIVES: To make financial assistance awards to Indian tribes and tribal and Indian health
organizations to enable them to recruit, place, and retain health professionals to fill critical
vacancies and to meet the staffing needs of Indian health programs and facilities including those
administered by the Indian Health Service (IHS).
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants; Project Grants (Cooperative Agreements).
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Establishing and operating programs designed to recruit and
retain health professionals into Indian health programs and facilities.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Any federally-recognized Indian tribe or tribal or Indian health
organization is eligible to apply.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Preference is given to those applicants who propose to recruit for
health programs and facilities that IHS has designated as Tier I sites for the IHS Loan Repayment
Program for physicians, nurses, and other health professions.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Not applicable.
Application Procedure: An IHS Grant Application Kit may be obtained from the Grants
Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and Grants Operations, Twinbrook Metro Plaza,
12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-5204.
This kit includes Standard Form PHS 5161-1 (Rev. July 1992); Standard Forms 424, 424A, and
424B (Rev. April 1988); Application Receipt Card - PHS 3038 (Rev. May 1990); Tier 1
Listings, Criteria for Tierl Equivalents, instructions for preparing the program narrative; and
IHS Application Check List.
146
-------
Award Procedure: Grants are made directly by the Indian Health Service to applicant
:y, based on results of competitive review process.
Deadlines: Contact Headquarters Office listed below for application deadline.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Within 90 days of IHS deadline.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Continuation applications must be submitted annually. Continuation funding is
subject to availability of funds, satisfactory performance, and continuing need of the IHS for the
program.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Payments of grant funds are made through the
Payment Management System or Electronic Transfer System. Information will be forwarded to
new grantees regarding the process of obtaining funds.
JiOST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Projects must have data systems to support administration and evaluation of the
project.
Audits: State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the
State's fiscal year shall have an audit.
Records: The Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized
representatives, shall have the right of access to any books, documents, papers, or other records
of a grantee, subgrantee, contractor, or subcontractor, which are pertinent to the HHS grant, in
order to make audits, examinations, exceipts and transcripts. Grantees are required to maintain
grant accounting records 3 years after the end of a budget period. If any litigation, claim,
negotiation, audit or other action involving the records shall be retained until completion of the
action and resolution of all issues which arise from it, or until the end of the regular 3-year
period, whichever is later.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-03904 1 -551.
147
-------
Obligations: (Grants and Cooperative Agreements) FY 93 $547,000; FY 94 est $547,000;
and FY 95 est $547,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $585,000 to $100,000.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, five awards were issued. It is
anticipated that five continuations will be funded in fiscal years 1994 and 1995, respectively.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local 'Office: None.
Headquarters Office: For program information, contact Mr. Darrell Pratt, Chief, Health
Professions Support Branch, Division of Health Professions Recruitment and Training, Indian
Health Service, Room 6-34, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
Telephone: (301) 443 4242. For grants management information, contact Ms. Kay Caipentier,
Grants Management Officer, Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and Grants
Operations, Indian Health Service, Twinbrook Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite
100, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-5204.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Not applicable.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Need - Is the need for the project justified? If a|
project targets urban Indian health programs; is there justification and documentation for
conducting activities at that site? Do proposed efforts complement and expand past recruitment
efforts? Approach - Are the objectives well stated? Is the applicant's work plan for conducting
the project sound and effective? Is the approach innovative? Are the activities proposed cost
effective and will they lead to effective recruitment, placement, and retention? Adequacy of
Management Controls - Is the applicant capable of successfully conducting the project both from
a technical and business standpoint? Is the proposed interaction with IHS staff adequate for an
application for recruitment of Federal staff? Is the budget sound in relation to the work plan and
does it assure effective utilization of grant funds? Are the facilities and equipment adequate? Key
Personnel - Regarding the position descriptions, are the qualifications of key personnel
appropriate and adequate to cany out the project? If a resume is provided, are the individual's
qualifications and experiences consistent with the position description and conduct of the project.
148
-------
93.971
HEALTH PROFESSIONS PREPARATORY
SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR INDIANS
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Health Care Improvement Act, Public Law 94-437, as amended.
OBJECTIVES: To make scholarships to American Indians and Alaska Natives for the puipose of
completing compensatory pre-professional education to enable the recipient to qualify for
enrollment or re-enrollment in a health professions school or curriculum.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Scholarship awards are limited to persons of American
Indian or Alaska Native descent. Awards are limited to a maximum of 2 years of full-time
scholarship Support under this section of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Scholarship awards are made to individuals of American Indian or
ka Native descent, who have successfully completed high school education or high school
valency and who have been accepted for enrollment in a compensatory, preprofessional
general education course or curriculum.
Beneficiary Eligibility: Individuals of American Indian or Alaska Native descent.
Credentials/Documentation: Students must submit proper documentation of Indian
eligibility verification from the college advisor that the courses or curriculum to be taken are
required to meet the applicant's deficiency and compensatory needs at the professional level and
represent the number of credit hours which the school considers as full-time or at least 6 credit
hours per semester for part- time.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplication is not required.
Application Procedure: Application forms and instructions are provided by the Indian
Health Service (IHS) Scholarship Program acting through the IHS Area Program Offices.
Application forms and required documentation (official transcripts, letter of acceptance by
college, curriculum verification, Indian eligibility, tuition verification, faculty evaluations) should
be submitted to IHS Headquarters for review and approval/disapproval.
149
-------
Award Procedure: Payments for stipends and books are made directly to the individual
applicant. Tuition payments are made to the college or university, upon receipt of an invoice.
Deadlines: Contact IHS Area offices for application deadlines. New applications axe
usually available to interested individuals in March with a submission deadline in mid-April.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Applicants are notified by September 30.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Continuation applications must be submitted annually. Continued funding
subject to availability of funds and satisfactory performance.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Tuition payments are paid upon receipt of
invoices from the universities. Stipend payments are paid monthly, for 10 months or for the
academic period if students attends summer school. Amount for books and other necessary
expenses are provided to student.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Students are required to submit copies of :heir official transcripts as they are
received. In addition, recipients must submit initial progress reports on forms supplied by IHS
and notifications of problems/changes .
Audits: Not applicable.
Records: Indian Health Service Scholarship Branch, IHS, maintains records on all
students. Records are maintained for 4 years after the final award payment, has been made.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-039041-551.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $1,873,182; FY 94 est $2,057,200; and FY 95 est
$2,159,643.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $13,182 to $26,019; $14,800.
150
-------
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: For fiscal year 1993, 135 new awards were made. For
J year 1994, it is anticipated that 50 new and 89 continuing awards will be made, and that
new and continuation scholarship awards will be funded in fiscal year 1995.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: See Appendix IV of the Catalog for Indian Health Service Area
Offices.
Headquarters Office: Program Contact: Mr. Linus Everling, IHS Scholarship Program,
Indian Health Service, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services,
Twinbrook Metro Plaza, Suite 100, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852.
Telephone: (301) 443-6197. Grants Contact: Ms. Patricia Lee-McCoy, Grants Scholarship
Coordinator, Grants Management Branch, Division of Acquisition and Grants Operations, Indian
Health Service, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Twinbrook
Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301)
443-0243.
RELATED PROGRAMS: None.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: In fiscal year 1994, new scholarship recipients will be
funded in the pre-professional categories of pre-nursing, premedical technology, pre-physical
therapy) pre-engineering, pre-sanitation, and pre-pharmacy only.
—ITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Applicant must be American Indian or Alaska
Native. Other elements considered are: (1) Academic performance; (2) faculty recommendation;
(3) stated reasons for asking for the scholarship; (4) goals of the individual; and (5) the relative
needs of the IHS and Indian health organizations for persons in specific health professions are
taken under consideration.
151
-------
93.972
HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIP
PROGRAM
FEDERAL AGENCY: INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AUTHORIZATION: Indian Health Care Amendments of 1988, Section 104.
OBJECTIVES: To provide scholarships to American Indians and Alaska Natives at health
professions schools in order to obtain health professionals to serve Indians. Upon completion,
scholar ship recipients are obligated to serve in the Indian Health Service or an Indian health
organization for each year of support with a minimum of 2 years.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants.
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Scholarships support students who pursue full-time or
part-time courses of study in health professions needed by the Indian Health Service (IHS).
Disciplines have included allopathic and osteopathic medicine, dentistry, nursing (baccalaureate
and graduate), public health nutrition (graduate), medical social work (graduate), speech
pathology/audiology (graduate), optometry, pharmacology and health care administration. Not all
disciplines participate each year. Scholarships may not be awarded to students who have
conflicting service obligations after graduation or who are not U.S. citizens at the time of
application. Recipients are required to perform 1 year of obligated service for each year of
scholarship support, with a minimum obligation of 2 years in the Indian Health Service, or in a
program conducted under a contract entered into under the Indian Self-Determination Act; or in
an Indian health organization assisted under Title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act;
or in private practice in a Health Manpower Shortage Area which addresses the health care needs
of a substantial number of Indians. Deferment for internship, residency, or other advanced
clinical training for medical, osteopathy, and dental students is generally not to exceed 3 years,
consistent with the specialty needs of the IHS. Currently, 4-year deferments may be granted for
obstetrics-gynecology and psychiatry residencies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: Individuals of American Indian or Alaska Native descent are
eligible. Applicants for new awards: (1) must be accepted by an accredited U.S. educational
institution for a full-time or part-time course of study leading to a degree in medicine,
osteopathy, dentistry, or other participating health profession which is deemed necessary by the
Indian Health Service; (2) he eligible for or hold an appointment as a Commissioned Officer in
the Regular or Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service; or (3) be eligible for civilian service
in the Indian Health Service.
152
-------
Beneficiary Eligibility: Individuals of American Indian or Alaska Native descent;ftill-time
:s of medicine or other health professions; prospective or currently Commissioned Officers
Regular or Reserve Corps of the Public Health Service; and, eligible civilians of the Indian
Health Service.
Credentials/Documentation: Students claiming Indian priority must submit proper
certification and documentation as specified in the application. All applicants must provide
transcripts of their latest academic work. All incoming freshmen are to provide copies of
acceptance letters for enrollment in school.
APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS:
Preapplication Coordination: Preapplication coordination is not required.
Application Procedure: Application forms and instructions arc provided by the Indian
Health Service Scholarship Program, acting through the EHS Area offices. Award Procedure:
Priority will be given to applicants who are prior recipients. Special consideration is given to
junior and senior level students whose specialty plans are in primary care fields. Criteria which
determine competitive ranking for awards may include: (1) work experience, referable
health-related in communities of health care need; (2) personal background from a community of
health care need; (3) career goals of primary care practice in serv ice to Indians; and, (4)
academic performance. Student financial need does not affect selection. Deadlines: Contact IHS
4iea offices for application deadlines. New applications are available to interested individuals
ly in March with a submission deadline in mid-April.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Applicants notified by September 30.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: Continuation applications must be submitted annually. Continued funding
subject to availability of funds and satisfactory performance.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: This program has no statutory formula or
matching requirements.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Tuition payments are paid upon receipt of invoices
from the universities. Stipend payments are paid monthly for the 12-month academic period. An
amount for books and other necessary expenses is provided to the student. Maximum length of
funding is a total of 4 years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
153
-------
Reports: Students are required to submit copies of their official transcripts as they are
received. In addition, recipients must submit initial and mid-teim progress reports on forms
supplied by IHS. Annual reports are required from schools indicating average student educational
expense.
Audits: Not applicable.
Records: The Indian Health Service Scholarship Program, maintains records for 7 years
following completion of obligated service or other disposition of the scholarship obligation.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 75-03960-1-551.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 93 $8,390,213; FY 94 est $8,782,000; and FY 95 est
$8,967,000.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $12,136 to $38, 222; $18,990.
PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1993, 153 new and 388 continuing
scholarships were awarded. It is anticipated that 462 scholarships will be awarded in fiscal year
1994, and 473 scholarships awarded in fiscal year 1995.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: Contact your local/regional EPA office.
Headquarters Office: Program Contact: Mr. Linus Everling, IHS Scholarship Program,
Indian Health Service, Public Health Serv ice, Department of Health and Human Services,
Twinbrook Metro Plaza, Suite 100, 12300 Twin brook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852.
Telephone: (301) 443-6197. Grants Contact: Ms. Patricia Lee-McCoy, Grants Management
Branch, Division of Acquisition and Grants Operations, Indian Health Service, Public Health
Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Twinbrook, Metro Plaza, 12300 Twinbrook
Parkway, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 443-0243.
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: In fiscal year 1993, there were 455 scholarships
awarded to students in the following categories: nursing, medicine, medical technology, health
administration, x-ray technology, optometry, dentistry, pharmacy, dental hygiene, dietetics,
masters of public health, health education, chemical dependency counseling, speech pathology,
health records, engineering, physician assistant, sanitation, and physical therapy.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: (1) academic performance; (2) faculty
recommendations; (3) stated reasons for asking for the scholarship; (4) goals of the individual;
and (5) the relative needs of the IHS and Indian health organizations for persons in specific health
professions.
154
-------
WRITING THE GRANT PROPOSAL
-------
WRITING THE GRANT PROPOSAL
NOTE: The User should first follow the directions in the program guidance. An example of
how to prepare an EI proposal, with some suggestions on what makes a good proposal is
included for your information. The following is given as a suggestion not direction.
There are eight basic components to creating a solid proposal package: (1) the proposal
summary; (2) introduction of organization; (3) the problem statement (or needs assessment); (4)
project objectives; (5) project methods or design; (6) project evaluation; (7) future funding; and
(8) the project budget.
The proposal summary outlines the proposed project and should appear at the beginning of
the proposal. It could be in the form of a cover letter or a separate page, but should be brief - no
longer than two or three paragraphs. The summary would be most useful if it were prepared after
the proposal has been developed in order to encompass all the key summary points necessary to
communicate the objectives of the project. It is this document that becomes the cornerstone of
your proposal, and the initial impression it gives will be critical to the success of your venture. In
many cases, the summary will be the first part of the proposal package seen by agency officials
and very possibly could be the only part of the package that is carefully reviewed before the
decision is made to consider the project any further.
The applicant must select a fundable project which can be supported in view of the local
need. Alternatives, in the absence of Federal support, should be pointed out. The influence of
the project both during and after the project period should be explained. The consequences of the
project as a result of funding should be highlighted.
The applicant should gather data about its organization from all available sources. Most
proposals require a description of an applicant's organization to describe its past and present
operations. Some features to consider are: A brief biography of board members and key staff
members. The organization's goals, philosophy, track record with other grantors, and any
success stories. The data should be relevant to the goals of the Federal grantor agency and
should establish the applicant's credibility.
The problem statement (or needs assessment) is a key element of a proposal that makes a
clear, concise, and well-supported statement of the problem to be addressed. The best way to
collect information about the problem is to conduct and document both a formal and informal
needs assessment for a program in the target or service area. The information provided should be
both factual and directly related to the problem addressed by the proposal.
156
-------
USEPA Re»i*x VQI
SUGGESTIONS/STREN GTSX "^EAKNESSFS
PREPARING AN EfmRONMENTAL JVIfTICE GRANT APPLICATION
May IT.
mis information is intended to help you pic togsta-1 compose proposal for the
Environmental Protection Agency s PAl &v^^ Justks please read
the attached Apphaoon Guidelines carefully - k B n0,
replace the official fiscal year guidance.
~ Target your audience carefully
With relatively smaU amounts of money to <™A witt. you m identi(y a mc
or community to worit with m order to devek* a prcgrani that will rive the return
for you dollars invested.
~ Build partnerships and alliances
You are strongly encouraged to enlist the inrnhmaofp^ whh similar or related goaIs
in the project and secure Uieir commitment of service Md/or Be ^
this by obtaining letters of commitment for the appe^ of wwk
partnerships early m your planning, since building allium ^ ^ ^ ^ effojt
~ Do some homework
Allow time to review the literature on environmental justice issues both within EPA and the
community you work.with. Find out what materials exist on the subject and procedures you
are planning to indude in your work plan. Use this information to back up your project
decisions or to explain why your group wants to do thincs a bit differently
~ Develop a project evaluation technique
Define as carefully and precisely as possible what it is von n„„,, u- ... . • • ^
. , . u c. 1 % u , ' 15 >ou want to achieve with this project
and how you will test how successful it has been. Ask vni.r«of . u
. 3 . . 1 „ 0 .. yourself what you expect to be
different once the project is complete? Outline a plan von «,;n ... » . c
. .. , . J r F >ou Wl^ use to measure the success of
your activities/project.
~ Develop a timeline
List the major tasks that will have to be completed to mm tho „ i„ -n.
, , , . „ . , ,, r . meei ?oals of the project. Then
break these into smaller tasks and lay them out m a schedule over the twelve months in an
annual grant period Determine what personnel, materials, and other resources you will need
to carry out the tasks. J
~ Develop a budget for a project not over $20,000
If your budget is larger than $20,000 find one piece of the project that can stand alone.
Apply for this grant to fund just that one piece of the larger project. Divide your budget into
categories such as peisonnel salanes/fnnge benefits, travel, equipment, supplies contract
costs, other.
157
-------
~ Stay within the format
This makes it easier for the reviewer to read and, therefore, understand your work plan.
Listed are some work plan suggestions.
A work plan describes the applicant's proposed project. Work plans must be no more
than five pages total. One page is one side of a single-spaced typed page. The pages
must be letter size (8 1/2" x 11"), with normal type size (10 or 12 cpi) and at least 1"
margins. The only appendices and letters of support that EPA will accept are a
detailed budget, resumes of key personnel, and commitments letters.
Work plans must be submitted in the format described below:
I. A concise introduction of no more than one page that states the nature of the
organization, how the organization has been successful in the past, purpose of the
project, project completion plans, target audience, and expected results,
n. A concise project description of no more than four pages that describes how the
applicant plans to meet at least two of the three evaluation criteria outlined in the
application guidance. Additional credit will not be given for projects that fulfill more
than two criteria.
HI. A conclusion of no more than one page discussing how the applicant will evaluate the
success of the project, including the anticipated benefits and challenges in
implementing the project.
IV. An appendix with no ore than two pages of resumes of up to three key personnel.
V. An appendix with one page letters of commitment from other organizations with a
significant role in the project. Letters of endorsement are not acceptable.
~ Communicate the nature of your project accurately, precisely, and concisely
Describe exactly what you propose to do, how you are going to do it, when you are going to
do it, who will benefit, and how you will know you are successful. Indicate not only what
you propose, but also what expertise your group possesses for doing it (include resumes).
EVALUATION OF YOUR PROPOSAL
Your proposal will be evaluated by a committee of EPA Headquarters and Regional
environmental justice personnel of diverse personal and professional backgrounds. Final
selection is based on a variety of factors, including geographic and socioeconomic balance,
diversity, cost of the project and how well the partnership benefits can be sustained after the
grant is completed. Below are some common strengths and weaknesses we see in proposals.
COMMON STRENGTHS
~ Project proposal developed solidly from within the community.
~ Broad based community support for a project which has the potential to impact local
people.
~ Good partnership with industry, community, and environmental groups. Good
coordination with a variety of community groups.
~ Proposal does a good job of outlining a complex problem and approach to solving it
did not overlook any major issues or key players.
~ Clear identification and background description of population to be served.
158
-------
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION
OF APPLICATION
STANDARD FORMS 424, 424A and 424B
1. STANDARD FORM 424: Must be signed by official who has authority to commit
applicant agency/organization performance.
Complete all items on the fonn, except Item No. 4 (Item No. 2 is optional), as
follows:
Item 3 - State Application Identified (SAI)
Item 6 - Assigned by IRS (obtain from Personnel Office)
Item 9 - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region vm
Item 10 - Insert Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title,
if known
Item 11 - Objective: Brief Description of Project
Item 13 - "Stan Date" and "Ending Date" should reflect amount of time
required to complete scope of work
Item 14 - a. Congressional District of your Agency
b. Congressional District of project
Item 15 - a. Federal funds requested
b. Recipient match
g. Total of sdl funds
Item 16 - If applicable
Item 17 - Debt statement
Item 18 - a, b, and c. Signature, title and date of Agency head who has
authority to commit funds for your organization
2. STANDARD FORM 424A: Complete both pages
Section A: BUDGET SUMMARY: Complete this section only if you are
requesting carryover and new funds.
Section B: BUDGET CATEGORIES: This should show the combined Federal
and non-Federal funds distributed by Object Class categories (see
Guide for Preparing Budget Detail for list of requirements).
Section C: NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES: Optional.
Section D: FORECASTED CASH NEEDS: Required for Construction Grams
and State Revolving Funds; all other programs are optional.
160
-------
Section E:
BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR
BALANCE OF THE PROJECT: Optional.
Section F: OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION: In Block No. 22, insert
percentage rate and dollar amount of the base on which you are
claiming indirect costs. Also, please attach a copy of the current
"Indirect Cost Negotiation Agreement." In Block No. 23, insert the
percentage of your targeted Minority Business Enterprises/Women's
Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE) "Fair Share" of contract/
subcontracts.
3. STANDARD FORM 424B, ASSURANCE: MUSXBESIGNED BY APPLICANT
AjGENCY/ORGANIZATION u£FIQAL WHO SIGNED THE SF-42&
161
-------
APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
DATE SUBMITTED
APPLICANT IDENTrETni
(Opa»asii Aianm it
Apjaauu
I. TYPE OF SUBMISSION
• DA IT R£CCr>'ED 8 V STATU j STATE APPLICATION Kt9UUta
t /<"" Profnms corrrra t, £q [2JT2
/pucinoo
Picaopiicuao
4. DATE RECEIVED BY
FEDERAL IDENTIFIER
~ Cotutnieaoo
C Construction
FEDERAL AGENCY
******* by OU-
0 \on-Coa»RtesoB
O Non-Conrovcoor
j* Arruuuii
Lifu Name: 1 OfTininnnrui Ujuu
ADDRESS (five cny. county, taic. ana xxo coaet:
Name un lelcpaoac ouooer oi (He penoo d ee «««»«««¦
ob maaert involving ttm ippljrtoon (frre in code).
7. Type of Applicant: lener tppippimt kmr a boo EH
A. Sob
B. County
C. Mnrnnpil
D. Towamp
E. linmua
F» lomiBumpii
G. Scecal Dinna
H. iadcpenaem School Dm.
L ~— <- ¦ -"-^i | ,
J. Pmrue Ucrmuty
ILIodas Tribe
L. Individual
M. Profit Oxgwtztooa
N. Oilier (Specify):
6. Employer idesnrmnon misiser asb/bm #7
Ot—11 /in ftwnil Ofllct
~ ~-~~~~~~~
1. Type of AppUaoon;
0 NEW O CoflBBBSoon 0 Rrrawn
n n
IfRnruioa. cacr appropriate Icsenii o boxies): L_ LJ
9. Nunc of Fedeni Afcocy: n -
£mwbmmi .fttim— Agmey ¦
Ksfwm *• Dantr. Cnltrmdt ttjtj 7tU
10. Ctaioi oi FricraJ Dometnc Aimnnrr Nnmtocr _ .,
.1—- r—j r—> r—i $** cnu Ttiii
hb-ddd
St*t• Omv
).Dtere*ieDunan Other (tpeafy):
Tide:
11. Dempcrre Tide of Applicant! Project:
Otftan*: Brttf Dtxaipmm* t/frtftet
12. Ami Affected by Project icmn. rwmmi. trim, etc.):
13. Proooied Proiea.
14. Caaminooaj DimcaOf:
. Son Due Fnrlmg Our i. Applrim Cn«|iiif DLmux b. Project Caafrrmamai Diana
wktrt yw ufflc* u It rmud. »t*n prtfta u ieemud.
j 13. FrmrarBd Fmrtmt:
16. li (opucaooa fuopa e by Stas Ern imrt Outer 12372 Piuoeu.'
l. Fedeni | S Ftdtrml Funds Rxffmsud |
i. YES TUi prnppucaoon «nu node trulcble u
(be Sua F.m wire order 12372 proem for imcw os:
DATE
b. Appixsffl | S Rraptrmt timtck 1
e. 5m | 1 |
d. LocaJ | S
b. NO ~ Pretna b oot corend by E. O. 1ZT72
0 or Preftia tuu not bees tctrrrnrt by Sam far imew
c. omer | S
f. hmi— | S
17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT7
Q Yet' If *Ytt." imrti an etpUtaoon O No
|. Total S T*U »f AS Fimdt
I!. TO TOE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ALL DATA ON THIS APPUCATION.TKEAP PLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT.
THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL
COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED.
Afttuj htd kmi tithanf) ta r»mmif fvaJj ferjeur erxajmaasm
b. Tide
Mmb tf Bfiud tad dttttd
c. Pboae
Niuficr
^ifnifiiir ef Aoaorscd Rrprru nncrt
¦ - -
c. Doe Sir~c
Prrnoui Ffltnran Not Us&btc Staadud Fon 42* -
Pw-iiuul by OMB rtmitir A
SAMPLE APPLICATION
-------
*• IUIMU
BUDGET INFORMATION - Non-Conslrucllon Programs
SECTION A • BUDGET SUMMARY
Hum I'fpgiam
I iiiii lion
¦ ¦I "Umiiy
I j I
I "l.llv
Catalog of Fcdeial
Domestic Assistance
Nunilier
(b)
Estimated Unobligated Fundi
Fedeial
(c)
Non-I:edeial
(d)
New or Revised Budget
Fcdeial
(c)
Non-Fedeial
(0
ToUl
(X)
SECTION B - BUDGET CATEGORIES
11 i il.|. i i l Calrgmies
2 I'l l •-"Min i
It I ihut Hrnenis
I I.IM I
I i|iii|iinriil
e Sii|'|'lirs
I l iHiii.irlu.il
|' < oll' llIK III>||
li I lllll'l
i
j InJiicii Charges
lm.il I in eel Charges (sum of 6a • 6h)
GRANT PROGRAM, FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY
(I)
(2)
(3)
<<)
IOTALS (sum of 61 ud 6J)
c""'1
,fO*
pfl#
it*0
pl]P
t
MHngwiiiii,1 I ¦"¦rmi'l'lVi'i'iUiUL
TOTAL
(5)
7. Piogiain Income
Authorized Tor l-ocal Reproduction
SAMPLE APPLICATION - BUDGET
NaM fcy OM» Qwodm A
-------
SECTION C - NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES
(a) Grant Program
(b) Applicant
(c) State
(d) Other Sources
(e) TOTAI S
S.
9.
10.
11.
12. TOTALS (sum of lines 8-11)
SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS
TOTAL for 1st Year
1st Quaner
2nd Quarler
3rd Quarter
4ih Quarter
13. Federal
14. Non-Federal
IS. TOTAL (sure of lines 13 and 14)
SECTION E - BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT
(a) Grant Program
FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (YEARS)
(b) First
(c) Second
(d) Third
(e) Founli
16.
1 17
1 ,8-
1 19.
'
20. TOTALS (sum of lines 16-19)
SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION
(Attach additional sheets if Necessary)
21. Direct Charges:
22. Indirect Charges:
23. Remarks
m rMiiiii i'#
firt.iiuj t>r "Mb nJm a
Authorized for Local Reproduction
~Indirec Utile
-------
'Mi Ai»Mi
-------
,U. Will comoiy. :: aDpncaoie. • itn :'..ou insurance
purcnase reauirements o: Section i
-------
CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED FORMS/INFORMATION FOR
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
~ STANDARD FORM 424, APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.
~ STANDARD FORM 424A, BUDGET INFORMATION-
NONCONSTRUCTION GRANTS.
~ STANDARD FORM 424B, ASSURANCES.
~ BUDGET DETAIL, INCLUDING A BREAKOUT OF NON-CASH (IN-
KIND) CONTRIBUTIONS. (See example.)
~ EPA FORM 5700-49, CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT,
SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS.
~ ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE. (If applying for
more than $100,000 of Federal funds.)
~ INTER-GOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES. (If program is
covered by stare process, application must be submitted to the appropriate
State Clearinghouse, at least 60 days prior to award.)
£2 Completed ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION SHEET.
[ [ Current or latest negotiated INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT. (If
indirect costs are being claimed.)
| | WORKPLAN: Should be prepared in accordance with the guidance provided
by your EPA Project Officer.
ALL FORMS MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT OFFICIAL WHO
HAS AUTHORITY TO COMMIT ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE.
ALL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS LISTED ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED
IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED.
167
-------
CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED FORMS/INFORMATION FOR
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
0 STANDARD FORM 424, APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.
Q STANDARD FORM 424A, BUDGET INFORMATION-
NONCONSTRUCnON GRANTS.
0 STANDARD FORM 424B, ASSURANCES.
0 BUDGET DETAIL, INCLUDING A BREAKOUT OF NON-CASH (IN-
KIND) CONTRIBUTIONS. (Sec example.)
Q EPA FORM 5700-49, CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT,
SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS.
0 ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE. (If applying for
more than $100,000 of Federal funds.)
~ PROCUREMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION (EPA FORM 5700-48).
Q INTER-GOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES. (If program is
covered by state process, application must be submitted to the appropriate
State Clearinghouse, at least 60 days prior to award.)
0 Completed ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION SHEET.
| | Currenr or latest negotiated INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT or
COST ALLOCATION PLAN. (If indirect costs are being claimed.)
| [ WORKPLAN: Should be prepared in accordance with the guidance provided
by your EPA Project Officer.
1 [ Other requested documents. (See attached.)
ALL FORMS MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT OFFICIAL WHO
HAS AUTHORITY TO COMMIT ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE.
ALL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS LISTED ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED
IN ORDER FOR THE APPUCATION TO BE PROCESSED.
168
-------
OTHER REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR
NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
Please provide the following information along with your application:
~ Copy of ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.
j j Copy of your ORGANIZATION CHART/BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
~ Copy of CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING WITH STATE FOR
NONPROFIT STATUS.
~ Copy of TAX NUMBER APPROVAL or APPLICATION TO IRA.
P] Authorized person to sign giants documents, including payment request.
"H Copies of any other information pertinent to your organization.
NOTE: No costs may be incurred until you arc notified that grant funds are obligated
to your organization.
Any person being paid directly under the grant must be an official employee
of your organization.
Any program income to be earned from this project must be reported in
advance of the award or as soon as this information becomes known.
160
-------
CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED FORMS/INFORMATION FOR
INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS
~ STANDARD FORM 424, APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.
~ STANDARD FORM 424A, BUDGET INFORMAHON-
NONCONSTRUCTION GRANTS.
~ STANDARD FORM 424B, ASSURANCES.
~ BUDGET DETAIL, INCLUDING A BREAKOUT OF NON-CASH (IN-
KIND) CONTRIBUTIONS. (See example.)
~ EPA FORM 5700-49, CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT.
SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS.
~ Completed ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION SHEET.
| | Current or latest negotiated INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENT. (If
indirect costs are being claimed.)
[ [ WORKPLAN: Should be prepared in accordance with the guidance provided
by your EPA Project Officer.
ALL FORMS MUST BE SIGNED BY THE TRIBAL CHAIRMAN.
ALL FORMS AND DOCUMENTS LISTED ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED
IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICATION TO BE PROCESSED.
170
-------
PREPARING A BUDGET,
DETERMINING MATCHING AND
INDIRECT CALCULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS
-------
GUIDE FOR PREPARING BUDGET DETAIL
There is no blank fonn to fill in to show itemization of Object Class Categories with
appropriate level of detail; therefore, please submit a separate sheet of paper with the
proper itemization as shown below.
CATEGORY
INFORMATION TO BE SHOWN
Personnel
Positions of staff required.
Number of estimated hours.
Salary of staff (annual or hourly rate).
Estimates of personnel cost, by position.
(NOTE: No cost to be included if this cost is in
the Indirect Cost Pool. Include only agency staff
to be utilized in whole or in pan on this project.
Time and distribution of effort records must be
kept by pay period.)
Fringe Benefits
Basis upon which fringe benefits are calculated
(i.e., salaries).
Travel
Purpose.
Estimated number of trips.
Destination.
Estimated cost.
Equipment
Number and type(s) of equipment to be
purchased.
Price of each piece. (NOTE: Equipment is
defined in 40CFR, Part 31.3 as "tangible, non-
expendable, personal property having a useful life
of more than one year and acquisition cost of
$5,000 or more per unit").
Supplies
• General breakout of supplies (i.e., office
supplies).
Contractual Services
• Nature of contract services.
• Estimated total cost of each contract.
Construction
• If applicable, give a breakout.
171
-------
Other; In-Kind
• Detail other items "with estimated cost of each.
(List items, title, time and cost being used for in-
kind match.)
Other/Direct
Attach a copy of the latest negotiated Agreement
with Cognizant Agency with your application.
Show dollar amount in Section B of the Budget
Sheet.
Show dollar base and percent rate in No. 22 of
Section F of the SF-424A form.
Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)
(No ICR Established
with Another Federal
Agency)
Applicants for small grants (which do not exceed
$100,000 in Federal funds), who wish reimburse-
ment for administrative costs, must prepare an
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal. The applicant is
required to retain their indirect cost rate
documentation in their files, subject to audit.
The exceptions are Fellowship grants, loans.
Senior Environmental Program, Continuing
Environmental Programs and State Revolving
Fund.
172
-------
GUIDE FOR MATCHING REQUIREMENTS
To determine matching requirements:
1. The portion of allowable project costs that a recipient or third party contributes
toward completing the project; i.e., non-Federal share, matching share.
2. Depends on statutory, regulatory, or program guidance issued from headquarters.
EPA has a policy for a minimum 5% match.
3. May be satisfied with cash, applicant in-kind contributions, or third party each or in-
kind contributions.
4. Contribution may not be paid with Federal funds or with property or services
received under another assistance agreement (except funds received under the Indian
self-determination act).
5. Contribution must be:
• Negotiated before and specified in the assistance agreement.
• Verifiable from records.
• Used exclusively for a single project. (It cannot be used if it has been or will be
counted towards satisfying a matching requirement of another Federal grant, or
any other award of Federal funds.)
• Properly allocable and allowable under the project.
6. Non-monetary Contributions (in-kind)
• The fair market value of a non-cash contribution to meet a recipient's cost sharing
requirement.
Examples are:
Facilities, such as office space and classrooms; laboratory equipment, such as
office machines or teaching aids.
Materials, such as office, mainrrmnn- or classroom supplies.
173
-------
1 GUIDE FOR CALCULATING RECIPIENT MATCH
i
To calculate recipient match:
1. The Federal share divided by the Federal percentage equals the total cost.
2. The total cost minus the Federal share equals the recipient share.
Examples:
$75,000 (Federal Share) 90% (Federal Percentage) = $83,333 (Total Cost)
S83.333 (Total Cost) - $75,000 (Federal Share) = $8,333 (Recipient Share) or 10
percent of the Total Cost.
-------
GUIDE FOR CALCULATING INDIRECT COST
AMOUNT BASED ON TOTAL DIRECT COST
To calculate the indirect cost amount based on the total direc: cost:
1. The total divided by the indirect cost rate, plus 1.
2. The total minus" the total direct cost equals the indirect cost.
Examples:
$78,947 (Total) 1.139 (Rate + 1) = 569,313 (Total Direct cost)
$78,947 (Total) - 569,313 (Total Direct Cost) =
S 9,634 (Indirect Cost Amount)
Check:
569,313 (Total Direct) x 13.9 (Approved Rate) =
S 9,634 (Indirect Cost Amount)
174
-------
REMINDER LETTER
4PM-CGA
Mr. Boyce Wells, Director
Kentucky Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection Cabinet
Capital Plaza Tower, 5th Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
SUBJ: Submission of the Final Financial Status Report (SF-269)
EPA Assistance Agreements: CD994499-94-0'
Dear Mr. Wells:
The budget period for the above referenced assistance agreement will end on
May 31, 1996. The purpose of this letter is to remind you that the Financial Status Report(s) (SF-269)
(FSR) must be sent to my attention no later than 90 days after the end of the budget period. The
"Guidance for Preparation and Submittal of the FSR" along with an SF-269 (long form) and 269A
(short form) can be accessed on the Grants Automated Application System. The long form is for use
where program income, refunds, rebates, credits, and/or third party contributions are involved during
the budget period.
Please note that if the FSR includes unliquidated obligations, you must mark the form "Interim"
and attach a schedule for liquidating these obligations. You must also request a time extension of the
FSR due date. A "Final" FSR must be submitted when all obligations have been satisfied.
Your assistance agreement also requires submission of a final progress report to EPA within 90
days of project period expiration. For you convenience your final progress report may be submitted to
this office along with your final FSR.
If your project will not be completed before expiration of the approved project period, you
must request an extension of the project/budget periods so that you may be reimbursed for any costs
incurred after the current expiration date. Your request for extension must be submitted with
appropriate justification to the EPA Project Officer shown on page one (1) of your EPA Assistance
Agreement (Form 5700).
If you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact
Ms. Ethelreen Murdix, Grants Specialist, at (404) 347-2200, Vmx 6792.
We appreciate your cooperation. Please do not hesitate to call if we may be of assistance.
Sincerely,
-------
M
es
-------
t
v«fcO STa*
f ^ ^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
W, 2 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
\L PBQit0<9 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-3104
/ 100 ALABAMA STREET, S.W.
4PM—GPB CLOSEOUT LETTER
Ms. Anna Mae Tobbe
Manager
Grants and Contracts
Research Administration
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
SUBJ: Solid Waste Management Assistance
Cooperative Agreement #Xl994849-95-0
Dear Ms. Tobbe:
We have completed our administrative review of your final
Financial Status Report (FSR), and the EPA Project Officer has
received and approved all required reports; therefore, we are
closing this Agreement.
Your records should be retained for three years from the
date of the submission of the final FSR, or until any litigation
claim, or audit which was started before the expiration of the
three-year period is completed and all issues resolved.
To ensure proper disposition of your records, please refer
to 40 CFR 30.501 of our "General Regulations for Assistance
Programs." Once the provisions of this regulation are satisfied
you may dispose of these records in accordance with your own
practices.
Sincerely,
Ed Springer, Chief
Grants, IAG, & Audit Management
Section
Office of Policy and Management
Enclosure
Recycled/Recyclable .Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer)
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ASSISTANCE ADJUSTMENT NOTICE
RECIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS:
Ms Anna Mae Tobbe
Manager
Grants and Contracts
Research Administration
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
PROGRAM Solid Waste Management Assistance
ASSISTANCE NUMBER X1994849-95-0
Budget Period 09/01/95 to 12/31/96
AMOUNT AUTHORIZED $58,000
BALANCE REMAINING $ -0-
fx] FINAL FSR REVIEWED AND APPROVED
I I CARRYOVERS AND ADJUSTMENTS
~ Funds being withdrawn from award and no longer available for use.
Balance being carried forth and will be available In accordance with the
award document
REFUNDS/DRAWDOWNS
Our records Indicate that you received $ in EPA assistance funds.
According to your FSR, you reported a total of $ for the Federal share earned of
total outlays and unliquidated obligations.
~ Since you received payments In excess of your actual requirements, you owe EPA a
refund of $ . Within 30 days from the date of this notice, please submit a
check showing the assistance number and made payable to the Environmental
Protection Agency to:
US Environmental Protection Agency
Financial Management Section
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
NOTE., Interest will be charged on the unpaid amount after the refund due date.
Please request payment of $ no later than or the funds will
be withdrawn and no longer available to you. If you have any questions concerning this
action, please contact the Grant Specialist assigned to this project, ,
at 404562-8426.
Your FSR Is subject to subsequent adjustment based on audit findings. This transmittal must not be considered the final action on this costs.
By: Grants Management Office
Date:
-------
v><° s,-v
J*
i^LJ
10
GUIDANCE FOR PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION
OF FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSR's)
AND
FORMS (SF 269A)
-------
GUIDANCE FOR PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION
OF FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSR's)
PURPOSE: Instructions for completing the Financial Status Report
are found on the back of Standard Form 269 and 269A. The following
guidance augments those instructions for clarification purposes.
If you have a question on any item, please contact the Grants
Specialist identified on the assistance award on which you have a
question.
BACKGROUND
What is the FSR?
The Financial Status Report is the report which provides an
accounting of the expenditures and obligations incurred during
the budget period of the project.
When is the FSR required?
EPA regulations [40 CFR 30.505(b), 31.41(b) and 35.6670]
require the submission of an FSR within 90 days after the end
of each budget period.
To whom is the FSR submitted?
The FSR should be mailed to:
Linda C. Mobley, Chief
Grants and IAG Operations Unit
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
NEED FOR TIMELY SUBMISSION OF FSR7 s
EPJ^ requires an FSR in order to determine the status of its
financial assistance funds. Timely submission of FSR's enables EPA
to make the best use of available funds, to determine any payments
due to or from the recipient, and to close out the preceding award.
Note: Failure to submit a complete and timely FSR lis described in
this guidance may result in delay of subsequent awards, delays in
processing reimbursements, or ultimately, annulment of the award in
accordance with 40 CFR 30.900 and 31.44. FSR's filed after the 90
day period will result in suspension of payment processing.
Page 1 of 5
-------
DEFINITIONS
What ig an obligation?
When EPA awards an assistance agreement, EPA incurs an
obligation to reimburse the recipient for the federal share of
the eligible and allowable cost incurred in accordance with the
terms of the assistance agreement. Similarly, when the
recipient executes, e.g., a contract or a purchase order, an
obligation to pay for goods and services has been incurred. In
both cases, obligation is not to be confused with expenditure
(i.e., cash disbursement to contractors or vendors).
What is an unliguidated obligation?
An unliguidated obligation is an obligation that has been
incurred but not yet paid.
What is an unobligated balance?
An unobligated balance is the difference between the total
authorized amount as set forth on the latest amendment of the
assistance award and the total amount of obligations (outlays
and unliquidated obligations) incurred by the recipient during
the budget period of the assistance agreement.
SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE
Basic instructions are shown on the back of the SF 269A and SF
269A. The following supplementary guidance is intended to clarify
and amplify the basic instructions.
Item 6 - Final Report
This should be checked "Yes" only if the FSR shows "SO"
unliquidated obligations on Line 10.d. In cases where
an amount is shown on Line 10.d., the FSR is, by
definition, Interim and not Final.
Item 8 - Funding/Grant Period
Enter the project period dates shown on Item 25 of the
assistance agreement (EPA Form 5700-20A). If Item 25 states
"continuous" or if the assistance agreement is a continuing
annual program agreement (See 40 CFR Part 35, ^Subpart A)
enter "continuous".
Item 9 - Period Covered By This Report
Enter the relevant budget period dates shown in Item 26
of the assistance agreement.
Page 2 of 5
-------
Item 10 - Transactions (SF 269A)
Columns I and II - For continuing program grants, leave
blank.
Line 10.a - Total Outlays
On the FSR submitted, whether interim or final,
enter the total gross program outlays for the
budget period. Please pay particular attention to
the definitions of program outlays, as stated on
SF 269 and SF 269A, for reports prepared on a cash
basis versus reports prepared on an accrual basis.
Note; Gross program outlays must always consist
of the total program costs incurred for the
applicable budget period and must be traceable to
and supported by your accounting records. The
portion of total outlays representing direct labor
incurred for the program must be traceable to and
supported by payrolls and individual time and
activity distribrution (time sheets) records and
reports.
Line 10.b - Skip to Line 10.c
Line 10.c - Federal Share of Outlays
What percentage of project costs has EPA agreed to
share as stated in your grant or cooperative
agreement? (Please type or print that percent in
the blank space in lO.c). Multiply that percent
by the amount reported on Line 10.a above. Insert
that amount here.
Line 10.b - Recipient share of outlays
Determine your share of the outlays reported in
Line 10.a above by subtracting the amount in Line
10.c from the amount in Line 10.a. Insert that
amount here.
Line 10.d - Total Unliguidated Obligations
Any obligations which have not been converted to
outlays, i.e., either not paid, or, if paid, any
payments not yet recorded in recipient's books.
This line must be zero on all fin'ial FSR's.
Otherwise the report is an interim report. If you
have no unliquidated obligations, enter "0". The
FSR should be checked as "Final" under Item 6,
(Unless the budget period is not completed).
Page 3 of 5
-------
If you have unliquidated obligations, enter the total
unliquidated amount, and the FSR should be checked
"no" under Item 6. (All unliquidated obligations
reported in 10.d must also show the federal and
recipient shares on lines 10.e and f). However, a
final FSR must be submitted immediately after those
obligations are liquidated. NOTE: For budget periods
ending 9/30/91, the grant/cooperative agreement
administrative regulations at 31.23(b) changes the
provision for unliquidated obligations and reads as
follows, "...(b) Liquidation of Obligations. A
grantee must liquidate all obligations incurred under
the award not later than 90 days after the end of the
funding period (or as specified in a program
regulation) to coincide with the submission of the
annual Financial Status Report (SF 269). The Federal
agency may extend this deadline at the request of the
grantee." Due to this new reauiremfent. all interim
FSR/s must include an attachment listing unliquidated
obligations with a schedule of anticipated liquidation
dates. A revised FSR must be submitted every other
month thereafter until all obligations are liquidated
and a Final Report can be made.
Line 10.f - Federal Share of Unliquidated Obligations
EPA's percent share of these obligations applied to
the amount in Line lO.d above.
There is always a federal share of any unliquidated
obligations which must be seated on Line 10.f or the
FSR will be returned as incomplete.
Line 10.e - Recipient share of unliquidated obligations
This figure is computed by subtracting Line 10.f from
Line 10.d.
NOTE: Unless 100% federally funded, there is always a
recipient share of unliquidated obligations. Note
also that the sum of the amount on Lines 10.e and 10.f
must equal the amount on Line lO.d.
Line 10.g - Total Federal Share of- Outlays and Any
Unliquidated Obligations
Enter the sum of Lines 10.c and 10.f or the maximum
amount of the EPA award dollars as shown in your
assistance agreement, whichever is the lesser.
Page 4 of 5
-------
Note (1): If the EPA award dollars per the
assistance agreement is in fact less than the
mathematical calculation of the Total Federal
Share earned for the reporting budget period,
please show an asterisk (*) by the amount on line
10.g. and in block 12 state that, "The federal
share calculated per actual total program outlays
(line 10.a) exceeds the federal share awarded.
Therefore the total federal funds awarded have
been earned."
NOTE (2): (For continuing annual program
recipients that are substantially overmatched).
Regardless of whether actual program outlays
reported on line 10.a are more or less than the
approved program budget estimate, you have earned
the total federal funds awarded for the budget
period if the statutory maximum federal share
applied to total program outlays is greater than
the total federal funds authorized (through the
latest amendment within the budget period), and
you should enter the total federal funds awarded
on line 10.g. If you have any questions about
this procedure you should call your EPA Grants
Specialist or Mr. Bill Rogers (404/347-2200) prior
to submitting the FSR.
Line 10.h - Total Federal Funds Authorized for This
Funding Period
Enter the amount of the federal funds authorized
by the assistance agreement, as amended, for the
budget period covered by the FSR.
Line 10.i - Unobligated Balance of Federal Funds
Subtract Line 10.h from Line 10.g. When EPA
receives an FSR showing an unobligated balance,
EPA takes action to either deobligate the amount
shown on this line, or, if the assistance
agreement is for a continuing program, process
the recipients' request(s) to authorize its use in
a subsequent budget period (carryover).
Item 12 - Remarks
Clean Air Act Section 105 Air Programs Only:
All non-recurrent cost included on Line 10.g must be
reported under Item 12. Each item purchased and the
unit cost must be reported. Expenditures for equipment
purchases with a unit acquisition cost of $5,000 or
more are considered non-recurrent.
Page 5 of 5
-------
FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
(Short Form)
(Follow instructions on the back)
1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element
San Francisco CA 94103
2. Federal Grant or Other Identifying Number Assigned
OMB Approval
Page
|
of
1
By Federal Agency
No.
E-009999-90-0
0348-0039
page
3. Recipient Organization (Name and complete address, including ZIP code)
Department of Environmental Fortune
21 Blackjack Street
Las Vagas, Nevada 89193
4. Employer Identification Number
886001536
S. Recipient Account Number or Identifying Number
N/A
6. Final Report
QYes QNo
7. Basis
O Cash El Accrual
8. Funding/Grant Period (See Instructions)
From: (Month. Day. Year)
10/01/89
To: (Month. Day, Year)
09/30/91
9. Period Covered by this Report
From: (Month. Day, Year) To: (Month. Day. Year)
10/01/89 09/30/90
' 10. Transactions:
I
Previously
Reported
n
This
Period
III
Cumulative
a. Total outlays
$260,000
b. Recipient share of outlays
130,000
c- Federal share of outlays
130,000
d.
Total unliquidated obligations
e.
Recipient share of unliquidated obligations
f.
Federal share of unliquidated obligations
g-
Total Federal share (Sum of lines c and f)
h.
Total Federal funds authorized for this funding period
i.
Unobligated balance of Federal funds (Line h minus line g)
11. Indirect
Expense
a. Type of Rate (Place "X" in appropriate bo*)
Q Provisional O Predetermined 1Z1 Final O Fixed
b. Rate FY90 20%
FY9I 25%
c. Base S 1 00,000
49.000
d. Total Amount
$32,250
e. Federal Share
$16,125
12. Remarks: Attach any explanations deemed necessary or information required by Federal sponsoring agency in compliance with governing
legislation.
13. Certification: I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this report is correct and complete and that all outlays and
unliquidated obligations are for the purposes set forth in the award documents.
Typed or Printed Name and Title
SUZANNE GOLD
Arrni inMng Off)rpr
Telephone (Area code, number and extension)
(702)555-7777
Signature of Authorized Certifying Official
Date Report Submitted
01/18/90
Standard Form 269A (REV 4-88)
Previous Editions not Usable Prescribed by OMB Circulars A-102 and A-l 10
-------
Yes No
~ ~ 8- Is the amount of total Federal outlays and unliquidated obligations
(line 10(g)) calculated in accordance with the maximum Federal share
allowed in the latest assistance amendment?
Explain:
Total Federal outlays and unliquidated obligations (line 10(g))
Yes No
~ ~ 9- Does the amount entered on line 10(h) agree with the total EPA funds
awarded in the assistance amendment?
Total Federal funds awarded (line 10(h))
10. Unobligated balance of EPA funds (line 10(i))
Date Project Officer notified of balance / /
Proposed use of unexpended balance (e.g. offset and/or additional
authority to fund subsequent budget periods)
Yes No
~ ~ 11- Is there a level of effort requirement for this assistance program?
If yes, does the non-Federal share reflected on the FSR meet the
required level of effort?
Yes No
~ ~ 12.a. Is the indirect cost rate used the approved negotiated rate for the
applicable period?
Yes No
~ ~ 12.b. Is the Federal share of indirect costs applied correctly?
2
-------
w
5
-------
OVERVIEW OF THE AWARD PHASE
Program Office/lab
Issues
Programmatic
Approval
Financial Management
Office (Regions)
Commits Fund*
Program Office
Prepared/approves
Funding
Recommendation/
Decision Memo
SRO Reviews Awards
Over Thresholds
f
C2| rA 0 notifies
hie <*d filUtt r*2TS
ConqreS'jlMa.l
GMO Prepares
Assistance
Agreement/ Amendment
Award Official Executes
the
Agreement/Amendment
Award mailed to
Applicant
-------
EXECUTION OF
THE ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT
#2,
-------
r
Til IM&/KA
Page 1 of 10
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EPA ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENT
PARTI - ASSISTANCE NOTIFICATION INFORMATION
1. ASSISTANCE ID NO.
EQ984240-97-0
3. DATE OF AWARD
2. LOG NUMBER
04-EQ-000
4. MAILING DATE
~~«..EEMENT TYPE
6. PAYMENT METHOD
IX ] Advance l I Reimbursement I I ACH Number
Cooperative Agreement
Grant Agreement
X
Send Payment Request to:
Financial Management Office
7. TYPE OF ACTION
NEW PROJECT
Assistance Amendment
8. RECIPIENT
PROJECT AWAKE
RT. 2, BOX 282
COATOPA, AL 35470
9. PAYEE
SAME AS RECIPIENT
EIN NO.
000-41 -3808
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
ALL
10. RECIPIENT TYPE
NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
11. PROJECT MANAGER AND TELEPHONE NO.
DAISY CARTER
PROJECT OFFICER
(205) 652-6823
12. CONSULTANT (WWT Construction Grants only)
N/A
13. ISSUING OFFICE (CITY / STATE)
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Grants Management Office
U.S. EPA, Region IV
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
14. EPA PROJECT / STATE OFFICER AND TELEPHONE NO.
J. BROWN, PROJECT OFFICER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA. GA 30303 (404) 562-9672
ETHELREEN MURDIX
GRANTS SPECIALIST (404) 562-8426
15. EPA CONGRESSIONAL LIAISON & PHONE
Barbara Brooks, (202) 260-5660
1 6. STATE APPL ID (Clearinghouse)
AL-082197-01
17. SCIENCE FIELD
18. PROJECT STEP
(WWT Construction Grants Only)
N/A
ATUTORY AUTHORITY
continuation page)
20. REGULATORY AUTHORITY
40 CFR PART 30
21. STEP 2 + 3 & STEP 3 (WWT Construction Grants Only)
*. Treatment Level
b. Project Type
c. Treatment Process
TI7A"
d. Sludge n<-»inn
22. PROJECT TITLE AND DESCRIPTION
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM
NEW AWARD. Safe and Clean Drinking Water: The objective of this project is to conduct
workshops in the community on topics related to groundwater, water quality & community
safety and health risks. Refer to application & workplan dated 3/7/97.
23. PROJECT LOCATION (Areas Impacted by Project)
City / Place
COATOPA
County
SUMTER
AL
Congressional District
1,2
24. ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CFDA Program No. <1 Title) 66.604
Environmental Equity
25. PROJECT PERIOD
09/22/97 - 09/21/98
26. BUDGET PERIOD
09/22/97 - 09/21/98
27. COMMUNITY POPULATION
(WWT Construction Grants Only)
N/A
28. TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST
$26,500
29. TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST
$26,500
FUNDS
FORMER AWARD
THIS ACTION
AMENDED TOTAL
30. EPA Amount This Action
$o
$20,000
31. EPA In-Kind Amount
32. Unexpended Prior Year Balance
33. Other Federal Funds
o
34. Recipient Contribution
6,500
35. State Contribution
o
36. Local Contribution
37. Other Contribution
vabJe Project Cost
$o
$26,500
Site Name
Document
FY
Approp.
Budget
Program
Object
Site/Project
Cost
Control
Organization
Element
Class
Organization
l
Number
S
C
A
L
01)
TJ0011
9798
B
04T1
J4X
4121
Obligation /
Deobllgatior
20,000
EPA Form 5700-20A (Rev. 5-82). Replaces previous editions and EPA Forms 5700-1A,B,C, and D, all of which are obsolete.
-------
-------
PART II ¦ APPROVED BUDGET
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0
Page 3 of 10
TABLE A - OBJECT CLASS CATEGORY
(Nofvconstrudion)
TOTAL APPROVED ALLOWABLE
BUDGET PERIOD COST
-1- PERSONNEL
$5,800
:RINGE BENEFITS
0
TRAVEL
1.380
4. EQUIPMENT
3.138
5. SUPPLIES
5.732
6. CONTRACTUAL
3.450
7. CONSTRUCTION
0
8. OTHER
7.000
9. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES
$26,500
10. INDIRECT COSTS: RATE % BASE
0
11.TOTAL (Share: Recipient 24.60% Federal 75.40%.)
$26,500
12. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
$20,000
TABLE B - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
(Non-const rudton)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
a. TOTAL (Share: Recipient % Federal %.)
13. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
TABLE C - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
(Construction)
1. ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE
2. PRELIMINARY EXPENSE
3. LAND STRUCTURES, RIGHT-OF-WAY
4. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING BASIC FEES
5. OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING FEES
6. PROJECT INSPECTION FEES
7. LAND DEVELOPMENT
8. RELOCATION EXPENSE
9. RELOCATION PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESS
10. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL
11. CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECT IMPROVEMENT
12. EQUIPMENT
13. MISCELLANEOUS
14. TOTAL (Lines 1 thru 13)
15. ESTIMATED INCOME (H applicable)
16. NET PROJECT AMOUNT (Line 14 minus 15)
17. LESS: INELIGIBLE EXCLUSIONS
- ADD: CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL (Share: Recipient % Federal %.)
20. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
EPA Form S700-20A (Rev 5-S2)
-------
'P
fimPLL
PART III - AWARD CONDITIONS J> / ' \l ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0 Page 4 of 10
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. This agreement is performance based and developed consistent with EPA's
policy on Performance Based Grants and Region IV's policy for Management
of Grants and Cooperative Agreements. The workplan constitutes the
recipient's and EPA's commitment to accomplish the program goals and
objectives. EPA's review and evaluation of performance under this agreement
and EPA's response to the findings of oversight will be carried out in
accordance with the stated policies.
2. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS
For awards $5,000 or less, the maximum dollar amount for advances is set
at a rate equal to 80% of the total federal share of the project. The remaining
20% of the total federal share of the project will be reimbursed to the recipient
upon satisfactory completion receipt of the final technical project work
products and the Financial Status Report (FSR). The recipient must request
this via Standard Form 270 "Request for Advance or Reimbursement" which
will be included in the award package.
For awards over $5,000 the criteria outlined in 40 CFR 30.22 and 31.21 are
to be followed. The EPA Project Officer must approve the final payment.
In addition, the recipient understands that the Federal assistance funds may
not be used to sue the Federal government or any other governmental entity,
nor may they be used for legal fees.
The Grantee will be required to submit quarterly progress reports to the EPA
Project Officer. These reports will be submitted at the end of each quarter
(i.e., January 31,1998, April 31,1998, July 31,1998. The EPA Project Officer
will not approve the final payment until an acceptable Final technical report
and an acceptable Final Financial Status Report are received.
The Financial Status Report should be sent to the Regional Grants Office and
the technical report should be sent to the Project Officer.
3. PROGRESS REPORT
Within 90 days after the end of the project period the recipient agrees to
submit two copies of the final technical project report. The report must clearly
address the items below:
A. An abstract or overview of the project in terms of its overall process
and outcomes. Indicate which eligible activities and/or EPA criteria
were addressed and how these were fulfilled.
B. Include information on the target audience, such as (local residents,
community activists, businesses, etc.) and demographics of the target
audience.
EPA Form 5700-20A (Rev. 5-82)
-------
¦fi-f/) PC
-------
PART III - AWARD CONDITIONS
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0
Page 6 of 10
4. MBE/WBE CONDITION
The recipient must ensure to the fullest extent possible that at least 8% minimum
MBE/WBE goal of Federal funds for prime or subcontracts for supplies, construction,
equipment or services are made available to organizations owned or controlled by
socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, women, and historically black
colleges and universities.
The recipient agrees to include in its bid documents this 8% minimum goal and
require all of its prime contractors to include in their bid documents for subcontracts
the negotiated "Fair Share" percentage.
To evaluate compliance with the "Fair Share" policy, the recipient also agrees to
comply with P.L. 102-389 and the six affirmative steps stated in 40 CFR 30.44(b),
31.36(e) or 35.6580 (a) as appropriate.
The recipient agrees to submit an SF-334 "MBE/WBE Utilization under Federal
Grants, Cooperative Agreements, and other Federal Financial Assistance", to the
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Coordinator beginning with the Federal Fiscal
Year Quarter the recipient awards its first contract and continuing until all contracts
and subcontracts have been reported. These reports must be submitted within 30
days of the end of the Federal Quarter (January 30, April 30, July 30 and October
30).
The form should be mailed to:
Grants Management Office
Environmental Protection Agency
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
EPA Form 5700-20A (Rev. 5-82)
-------
PART III -- AWARD CONDITIONS
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0
Page 7 of 10
In accordance with Section 129 of Public Law 100-590, the Small Business
Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988, the recipient agrees to
utilize and to encourage any prime contractors under the assistance agreement to
utilize small businesses located in rural areas to the maximum extent possible. The
recipient agrees to follow the six affirmative steps stated in 40 CFR 30.44(b), 31.36
or 35.6580 as appropriate, in the award of any contracts under this assistance
agreement. Compliance with this requirement will be monitored during management
review conducted by EPA.
5. PROJECT REVIEW
In order to permit EPA to access the adequacy of program progress, the recipient
agrees to participate annually in a detailed, on-site (if EPA travel budget permits),
evaluation. The evaluation will include an overview of the project and project
expenditures. The evaluation will be negotiated by the recipient (Project Manager)
and the EPA Project Officer, The recipient agrees to furnish a mid-year technical
progress report, if requested by the EPA Project Officer.
6. PUBLICATIONS
EPA encourages the publication of the results of its assistance programs. However,
before an assistance recipient may publish these results as an EPA product, it must
comply with EPA's publication review process. The following steps must be
completed:
A. The recipient submits three copies of the material it intends to publish to the
EPA Project Officer.
B. EPA reviews the material and provides the recipient in writing, with any
changes it wishes to suggest.
C. The recipient prepares a revised draft. In so doing, the recipient should make
every effort to accommodate the suggestions provided by EPA review.
D. If EPA agrees that the material is appropriate for publication as an EPA
document, the recipient must include the following statement:
EPA Form 570O-2M (Rw. 9-82)
-------
PART III -AWARD CONDITIONS
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0
Page 8 of 10
The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement
(number) to (recipient). It has been subjected to the Agency's publications
review process and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.
Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation of use.
E. If EPA does not agree that the material is appropriate as an EPA document,
the recipient may publish the materials for its own use if it includes with the
published material the following statement:
Although the information in this document has been funded wholly or in part
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance
agreement (number) to (recipient), it may not necessarily reflect the views of
the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred.
F. EPA also encourages recipients to publish reports independently in refereed
journals at any time. (A refereed journal is one which subjects material to
review by a panel of experts before publication.) In order to do so, recipients
must meet the following requirements:
1. Submit a copy of the material to be published to the EPA Project
Officer at the time it is submitted to the journal for publication.
2. After publication, submit three copies of the published material to the
EPA Project Officer.
3. Include the following statement in the published material:
Although the information in this document has been funded wholly or
in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under
assistance agreement (number) to (recipient), it may not necessarily
reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should
be inferred.
I
EPA Form 5700-20A (Rev. 5-32)
-------
PART III - AWARD CONDITIONS
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: EQ984240-97-0
Page 9 of 10
G. In accordance with 40 CFR 31.34 or 30.36(c), as appropriate, the Federal
Government has an unrestricted right to use any data or information
generated using assistance funds or specified to be delivered to EPA in the
EPA assistance agreement. The Federal Government has a royalty-free,
nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to use any copyrighted data in any
manner for Federal Government purposes.
7. PROJECT TYPE CONDITION
This agreement is a project cooperative/grant agreement subject to the terms and
conditions of the approved work program. Costs incurred prior to the date of award
as shown in block 3 are not allowable for reimbursement under this award.
8. LOBBYING
Pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, any organization described in
Section 501 (c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall not be eligible for
subgrants under this Agreement, unless such organization warrants that it does not,
and will not, engage in lobbying activities prohibited by the Act as a special condition
of the subgrant. This restriction does not apply to loans made pursuant to approved
revolving loan programs or to contracts awarded using proper procurement
procedures.
The recipient agrees that it will not use assistance funds (Federal or non-Federal
share) for lobbying or political activities, in accordance with OMB Circulars No. A-21
and A-122 and EPA guidance.
Pursuant to Section 18 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, P. L. No. 104-65, 109
Stat. 691, the recipient confirms that:
(1) it is not a nonprofit organization described in Section 501 (c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986; or
(2) it is a nonprofit organization described in Section 501 (4)(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 but does not and will not engage in lobbying activities
as defined in Section 3 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.
9. In order to comply with the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, the recipient will
complete and return the attached Payment Information Form ACH Vendor Payment
System, (TFS Form 3881) with the signed Assistance Agreement.
EPA Form 9700-20A (Rev. 9-82)
-------
10. Grantee is required to attend a 1 to 2 day conference to be held in Atlanta during the
Month of October, 1997. Travel expenses for this conference will be paid from this
grant award.
11. By accepting this assistance agreement, the grantee agrees to satisfy all of the
concerns from the Alabama Department of Environmental Management mentioned in
their letter of August 21, 1997, within 60 days of grant award.
PART IV
NOTE: The Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the Original returned to the Grants Administration Division for Headquarters
awards and to the appropriate Grants Administration Office for State and local awards'within 3 calendar weeks after receipt or
within any extension of time as may be granted by EPA.
Receipt of a written refusal or failure to return the properly executed document within the prescribed time, may result in the
withdrawal of the offer by the Agency. Any change to the Agreement by the recipient subsequent to the document being signed
by the EPA Award Official, which the Award Official determines to materially alter the Agreement, shall void the Agreement.
OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
The United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereby offers
assistance/amendment to the PROJECT AWAKE for 75.40 % of all approved
RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION
costs Incurred up to and not exceeding $ 20,000 for the support of approved budget period effort described
ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
in application (including all application modifications) cited in Item 22 of this Agreement
03/07/97 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM
DATE AND TITLE
_, included herein by reference.
ISSUING OFFICE (Grants Administration Office)
AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
Grants Management Office
Waste Management Division
U.S. EPA, Region IV
U.S. EPA, Region 4
61 Forsyth Street
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SIGNATURE OF AWARD OFFICIAL
typed name and title Richard D. Green
Acting Director, Waste Management Division
DATE
This agreement Is subject to applicable U.S. Environmental Protection Agency statutory provisions and assistance regulations,
accepting this award or amendment and any payments made pursuant thereto, (1) the undersigned represents that he is duly
authorized to act on behalf of the recipient organization, and (2) the recipient agrees (a) that the award is sub|ect to the
applicable provisions of 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter B and of the provisions of this agreement (Parts i thru IV), and (b) that
cceptance of any payments constitutes an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any found by EPA to have been
tarpaid will be refunded or credited In full to EPA.
In
BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION
SIGNATURE
TYPED NAME AND TITLE DAISY CARTER
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DATE
EPA Form I700-2QA (R«v. 5-82)
-------
PAYMENT INFORMATION FORM
ACH VENDOR PAYMENT SYSTEM
This form is used for ACH payments with an addendum record that carries payment-related information. Recipients of these
payments should bring this information to the attention of their financial institution when presenting this form for completion
1 1 All shaded sections must be completed.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: The Information being collected on this form Is required under the
provision of 31 U.S.C. 3322 and 31 CFR 210. This Information will be used by the Treasury Department to transmit
payment data, by electronic means, to vendor's financial institution.- Failure to provide the requested in may delay or
prevent the receipt of payments through the Automated Clearing House Payment System.
COMPANY INFORMATION
Name:
Address:
SSN/BK
internet EfnaB Address;
Contact Person Signature:
Telephone Number
Fax Number.
Contact Person Name and Tltk*.
DATE:
Contract Number
AGENCY INFORMATION
Name:
Address:
Contract Person Nam*:
Telephone Number
Fax Number
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION INFORMATION
Nam*
Address:
ACH Coordinator:
Hine-Olfllt Houtinft Trans* NumbeeT
Telephone Number;
F*xNumb«c
OeposanrAccountfWc
Depositor Account Number;
Type of Account:
OcheddnQ
' SavfnQ
Fax NumberT
Signature and Title of Representative:
Telephone Number,
TFS Form 3881
s-a
Department of the Treasury
Financial Management Servtoe
-------
REOUEST FOR ADVANCE
OR REIMBURSEMENT
(Set instructionn on back)
Approved by Office of Management and
Budget. No. 80-R0183
PAGE OF
1 PAGES
1.
TYPE OF
PAYMENT
REQUESTED
a. "X** on*. or botk torn*
r-» r—I REIMBURSE
1—1 AOVANCC U MENT
b. "X" tk* anboabU ±o*
D FINAL D PARTIAL
2. BASIS OF REQUEST
~ CASH
D ACCRUAL
J. FEDERAL SPONSORING AGENCY AND ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT TO
WHICH THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED
4. FEDERAL GRANT OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER ASSIGNED
BY FEDERAL AGENCY
5. PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST
NUMBER FOR THIS REQUEST
6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER
7. RECIPIENTS ACCOUNT NUMBER
OR IDENTIFYING NUMBER
8. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REQUEST
FROM (moiUJk, day, |tar)
TO {month, day. vw>
9. RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION
Niiw
Number
and Strut
Cttf, Stats
and ZIP CM*
t0* PAYEE (WKtr* ek*cM if Co b« Mwi u ixOtmt than %Um 9)
Noma
Nwmbrr
amd Strict
City. Stats
and ZIP Cod* :
11. COMPUTATION OF AMOUNT OF REIMBURSEMENTSfADVANCES REQUESTED
PROGRAMS/FUNCTIONS/ACTIVITIES ~
(a)
«»
<«>
TOTAL
(As of date)
a. Total program
outlays to data
$
$
$
$
b. Less; Cumulative program income
c. Net program outlays (Line a minus
line o)
d. Estimated net cash outlays for advance
period
a. Total (Sum of lines c & d)
f. Nonfederal share of amount on line e
g. Federal share of amount on line e
h. Federal payments previously requested
i. Federal share now requested (Line g
mtnua line h)
J. Advances required by
month, when request-
ed by Federal grantor
agency for use in mak-
ing prescheduled ad-
vances
1st month
2nd month
3rd month
12. ALTERNATE COMPUTATION FOR ADVANCES ONLY
a. Estimated Federal caih outlays that will be made during period covered by the advance
$
b. Lets: Estimated balance of Federal caih on hand as of beginning of advance period
c. Amount requested (Line a minus Itne b)
$
13.
CERTIFICATION
1 certify that to the best of my knowledge
and belief the data above are correct and
that all outlays were made in accordance
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL
DATE REQUEST
SUBMITTED
with the grant conditions or other agree*
ment and that payment is due and has not
been previously requested.
TYPED OR PRINTED NAME ANO TITLE
TELEPHONE (AREA
CODE, NUMBER.
EXTENSION)
This span for agency use
270-102
STANDARD FORM Z70 (7-76)
Prescribed by Ofllc* of lUnacarMnt and Budget
Clr. No.A-110
-------
w
-------
PRUDENT PROJECT OFFICER
CRITERIA FOR RECOMMENDING TIME EXTENSIONS
Is the extension necessary and reasonable for completion of the project;
i.e., what is the minimum time needed (necessary and reasonable) to
successfully complete the wort?
Has the recipient demonstrated good overall performance of the work?
Has the recipient demonstrated a good-faith effort to meet project schedules?
Are there extenuating circumstances outside the recipient's control, for example:
* Adverse weather conditions?
* Unexpected resource constraints, i.e., hiring or equipment freezes?
* Organizational and/or critical personnel changes?
* Third party match difficulties?
* Contracting and/or procurement problems?
Will the extension best serve the public interest?
-------
FACT SHEET
EXTENDING GRANT PROJECT/BUDGET PERIODS
—PART 31 (State, Local and Tribal Governments) AND OLD PART 30 RECIPIENTS
(Awards Made to Institutions of Higher Learning and Non-profit Organizations
Prior to 2/15/96)-
* Must obtain prior approval from the award official whenever there is a need to
extend the period of availability of funds.
—NEW PART 30 RECIPIENTS (Awards Made to Institutions of Higher Learning and Non-
profit Organizations On or After 2/15/96)-
* Are authorized to extend the expiration date of the award one time for up to 12
months without prior approval.
* Must notify the EPA award official in writing with the supporting reasons and
revised expiration date at least 10 days before the expiration date specified in the
award.
* This one-time extension may not be exercised merely for the purpose of using
unobligated balances.
-MEVUNUM DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FROM RECIPIENT AND/OR
PROJECT OFFTCER-
* Recipient request and justification
* Project Officer Decision Memo containing specific recommendation and discussion
of criteria used to develop recommendation
-------
n
o
w
to
E.
o
z
-------
-------
DOCUMENTATION
CANCELLED CHECKS
PAID BILLS
INVOICES
PAYROLL
^ TIME AND ATTENDANCE
RECORDS
>CONTRACT S
f* SUBGRANT AWARD DOCUMENTS
-------
-------
-------
: -'7V> -•/t's
, \\& . jj ^
\ ¦TTil
iVJ lUfi
¦¦
' i l-"'3 r
-:k)LSJ i:
¦-r-TT--^ —rri
. • T I t 1 ' 1 J
!i UA
ivXiSviiy i'U
3 j-; j:ip i-'ij h\\/f:( PJ >' l(vj[i (•¦'!' -/n
INDIVIDUALS,
PARTNERSHIPS
$600.00
= PARTS & MATERIALS
- SERVICES
- PRIZES AND AWARDS
™ CITHER INCOME PAYMENTS
-------
1
¦ MISCELIANE©U§ - $600.00
- INTEREST = 10.00
- BARTER/BROKEM - ALL
- CANCEL OF DEBT- ©®®»©0
-------
h: ¦ ¦ i
EWIC
-------
- A MUST FOR ALL INBIWUBtmS ;
*=¦ SOCIAL SECURITY NUMEEffi ©M
TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
- FULL NAME (DBA - IF APPOCABI.E)
» CURRENT ADDRESS
-------
-------
Direct Deposit of Grant Payment
1. Complete form SF 3881 and return to EPA.
- A payment can not be made until this
form is received.
- A new SF 3881 is required for each new
grant.
2. Mail Payment Request Form (SF 270) to the
EPA Finance Office.
3. Finance clocks-in or dates the SF 270 with the
date the payment was received in Finance.
4. Certification of payment will be made within
two workdays after the clock-in date.
5. Payment will be posted to your bank account
two to three workdays after the certification
date.
-------
REOUEST FOR ADVANCE
OR REIMBURSEMENT
(See tnscnicriorui on back)
Budget, NO. WJ-RQI83
PAGES
1.
TYPE OF
PAYMENT •
REQUESTED
a. "I" dm. or both boat
T—| |—| REIMBURSE.
U xwieic/, U ment
-------
INSTRUCTIONS
Please type or print legibly. Items 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 11c, lie, llf, llg, lli, 12 and 13 are self-explanatory;
specific instructions for other items are as follows:
Item £ zfry
2 Indicate whether - . prepared on cash or ac-
cr-jsd exoenditurc .-i.s. All requests for advances
shall be prepared on a cash basis.
4 Enter the Federal grant number, or other identifying
number assigned by the Federal sponsoring agency. If
the advance or reimbursement is for more than one
grant or other agreement, insert N/A; then, show the
aggregate amounts. On a separate sheet, list each
grant or agreement number and the Federal share of
outlays made against the grant or agreement.
6 tnter the employer identification number assigned by
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the FICE (institu-
tion) code if requested by the Federal agency.
7 This space is reserved for an acc-j;:number or other
identifying number that may be assigned by the
recipient.
3 Enter the month, day, and year for the beginning and
ending of the period covered in this request. If the re-
quest is for an advance or for both an advance and re-
imbursement, show the period that the advance will
cover. If the request is for reimbursement, show the
period for which the reimbursement is requested.
Note: The Federal sponsoring agencies have the option of
requiring recipients to complete items 11 or 12, but not
both. Item 12 should be used when only a minimum
amount of information is needed to make an advance
and outlay information contained in item 11 can be
obtained in a timely manner from other reports.
11 The purpose of the vertical columns (a), (b), and (c), is
to provide space for separate cost breakdowns when a
project has been planned and budgeted by program,
function, or activity. If additional columns are needed.
Item Entry
use as many additional terms as needed and in<_
page number in space provided m upper right; how-
ever, the summary totals of all programs, functions,
or activities should be shown in the "total" column on
the first page.
1 la Enter in "as of date", the month, day, and year of the
ending of the accounting period to which this amount
applies. Enter program outlays to date (net of refunds,
rebates, and discounts), in the appropriate columns.
For requests prepared on a cash basis, outlays are the
sum of actual cash disbursements for goods and serv-
ices, the amount of indirect expenses charged, the
value of in-kind contributions applied, and the amount
of cash advances and payments made to subcontrac-
tors and subrecipients. For requests prepared on an
accrued expenditure basis, outlays are the sum of the
actual cash disbursements, the amount of indirect ex-
penses incurred, and the net increase (or decrease) in
the amounts owed by the recipient for goods and other
property received and for services performed by em-
ployees, contracts, subgrantees and other payees.
lib Enter the cumulative cash income received to date, if
requests are prepared on a cash basis. For requo***
prepared on an accrued expenditure basis, ente
cumulative income earned to date. Under either i
enter only the amount applicable to program inc.
that was required to be used for the project oi
gram by the terms of the grant or other agreemen.
lid Only when making requests for advance payments,
enter the total estimated amount of cash outlays that
will be made during the period covered by the advance.
13 Complete the certification before submitting this
request.
OII-V '°M MQ
taSpng put iu*ui*»Minv jo nuio «q WW
(9l-O (UZ R1KM tmVQHVl*
esn fc>u«S> joj weds s|ta
-------
PAYMENT INFORMATION FORM
ACH VENDOR PAYMENT SYSTEM
This form is used for ACH payments with sn addendum record thai carries payment-related information. Recipients of these
payment5 should bring this information to the attention of their financial institution when presenting this form for completion
~ Al] shaded sections must be completed.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: The information b«lng collected ori this form I* required ur>der the
proviilon of 31 U.S.C. 3322 and 31 CFR 210. This Information will bo uted by the Treatury Department to transmit
payment data, by electronic meant, to vendors financial" Institution.- Failure to provide the requested In may delay or
prevent the receipt of payments through the Automated Ctoamg House Peymertt System.
COMPANY INFORMATION
N*rm:
Address: I SSN/E1
Internet Em»! Address:
CooUct Person Signature
Telephone Numben
Fee Numben
CcnUci Perron Nsme andTttie'
DATE;
Contract Number:
AGENCY INFC-^'ATrON
Narrx
Adiren
Contrad Per»on N«m«:
Tei«pho_< Number
Fix Number.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION INFORMATION
Narrw:
Address:
ACH Coordinator
Tttophor.* Number:
Fax Number
Nine-Otgtt Routing Tracs* Numfcrte.
Dd Till# erf Representative:
Teiephc* Number,
Fax Number:
TFS Form 3881
5-<7
Department of the Treatury
Flrunoai Mtot^rnent Service
------- |