t j 4'
Mil C i
Chemical A
Interstate
Water Supply
April 1975
-------
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF
INTERSTATE CARRIER
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
APRIL 1975
-------
FOREWORD
Under Reorganization Plan #3 of 1970, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was
established and assigned the responsibility of certifying water supply systems serving interstate
carriers. The responsibility was formerly vested in the Public Health Service, Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare as authorized by Public Law 410 of the 78th Congress, Section 361
of the PHS Act, as amended, and the Interstate Quarantine Regulations.
Interstate Quarantine Regulations require that water supply systems serving -planes, trains,
buses, and vessels engaged in interstate corrorierce comply with certain minimum health and safety
standards, as set forth in the Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards (1962). The EPA
published "A Guide to the Interstate Carrier Water Supply Certification Program," in June 1971,
which was revised in 1973. This Guide compiled various policies and procedures that had been
developed over the years and provided a specific basis for classification depending upon the degree
of compliance with the Drinking Water Standards (DWS). Systems are certified annually based on
data and recommendations submitted by the States. Systems in substantial compliance with the DWS
are classified as Approved; those with significant deviations from the quality, surveillance,
facilities or operational requirements of the DWS are Prohibited. A Provisionally Approved
classification may be granted if it is judged that the deviations, although significant, do not
IO
SQ
-------
pose an imminent and substantial danger to health. EPA's publication, Inventory of Interstate
Carrier Water Supply Systems provides the classification status of all interstate carrier water
supply systems. Whenever a system is prohibited, immediate notice is given to the Food and Drug
Administration, who advises the various carriers that they may no longer take on water from the
system in question.
This publication consists of the most recent chemical data submitted by the EPA regional offices
on the interstate carrier reporting forms through March 1, 1975. The data have either been
furnished by the State agencies concerned with the certification program or are from analyses
performed by EPA laboratories. More recent chemical data may be available and can be obtained by
contacting the State health department concerned or the EPA regional office.
Iron, manganese, and total dissolved solids are the three most common constituents that failed
the limits of the DWS. The substances that have failed the constituent limits of the DWS for a
recommended or mandatory limit are flagged accordingly. Occasionally, concentrations are less
than the detection limit of the analytical method used and the results are expressed "<". When
the limit of detection of the analytical method used is greater than the DWS limit, it is impossible
to determine whether or not the substance meets the constituent limit of the DWS. Concentrations
-------
not flagged because the DWS limits vary with the temperature. The current DWS does not contain
limits for sodium, alkalinity, hardness, pH, or mercury. A limit for mercury has been proposed
and mercury concentrations failing to meet the proposed value are flagged. Although several
CCE values were flagged by the computer, they may not be all the values that should have been
flagged. The 1962 limit was 0.2 mg/1 using a high-flow carbon adsorption method. A newer method,
using a miniaturized low-flow method, has significantly higher yields and it has been proposed that
the limit using the new method be 0.7 mg/1. There is no indication on the report forms concerning
which method was used. Therefore, values over 0.7 mg/1 fail to meet the limit without consid-
eration of the analytical method and values less than 0.2 mg/1 likewise meet the limit. Reported
values between 0.2 mg/1 and 0.7 mg/1 may or may not meet the limit. It depends on the method
used. If it is necessary to know whether or not the sample met the limit it will be necessary
to contact the State or the water utility.
Table I summarizes chemical and related water quality criteria and the effects of the con-
stituents in drinking water. Table II summarizes the extent of non-compliance with the DWS. When
there are both recommended and mandatory limits for a single constituent, Table II shows only the
number of supplies failing the mandatory limit.
Questions relating to the Interstate Carrier Water Supply Certification program and this
-------
listed inside the back cover, or to:
Mr. Roger D. Lee, Chief
Surveillance and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Supply Division (WH-450)
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
James H. McDermott, P.E.
Director
-------
TABLE I
CHEMICAL AND RELATED WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
Chemical Substance
Alkyl Benzene
Sulfonate (ABS)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chloride (CI)
Chromium
(Hexavalent) (Cr+&)
Copper (Cu)
Carbon Chloroform
Extract (CCE)
Cyanide (CN)
Fluoride (F)
Iron (Fe)
Recommended*
Limit (mg/1)
0.5
0.Q1
250.
1.0
0.01
0.8-1.7**
0.3
Mandatory*
Limit (mg/1)
0.05
1.0
0.01
Q.Q5
0.7***
0.2
1.4-2.4**
Effect
May cause undesirable taste and foaming.
Indicative of sewage pollution.
Toxic. Poisoning is cumulative and frequently fatal
Toxic. Affects heart, blood vessels, and nerves.
Toxic. May cause vomiting. Responsible for adverse
renal arterial changes in man.
Chlorides cause unpleasant taste.
Toxic
May impart an undesirable taste and cause vomiting.
Causes a blue stain to fixtures.
Indicator of organic residues (man made and natural)
Toxic
Aids in prevention of dental caries. Excessive
fluoride may cause mottled and discolored teeth.
Bitter or astringent taste. Water may be
brownish and could discolor laundry and stain
fixtures.
Lead (Pb)
0.05
-------
Manganese (Mn)
Mercury (Hg)***
0.05
0.002
Nitrate (NO3) 45.
Selenium (Se)
Silver (Ag) ^.Q5
Sodium****
Sulfate (SO4) 250.
Total Dissolved 5.Q0.
Solids (TPS)
Zinc (Zn) 5.
Impairs taste of beverage including coffee and tea.
Produces a brownish color in laundered goods.
Toxic. Has long retention time within the human
body and has serious effects on the human nervous
system and the brain, and damages developing
human tissue.
Toxic. Nitrate poisoning may occur in infants
during first few months of life.
Toxic. May increase incidence of dental caries.
A potential carcinogen.
Imparts a permanent blue-grey discoloration to the
skin, eyes, and mucous membrane.
Has been implicated in the cause of hypertension
and heart disease.
Unpleasant taste. Acts as a laxative. Makes
coffee bitter.
May cause Unpleasant taste.
Zinc salts may impart a milky appearance to the
-------
Related Factors
pH (Hydrogen Ion
Concentration)****
Alkalinity
(as CaC03)****
Hardness
(as CaCC»3)****
7.0-8.5 (World Health
Orgn. - International)
1963
30-500 (EPA, Water
Quality Criteria)
80-100 (American Water Works
Association Goal)
pH may interfere with effective disinfection. Wide
variations from a neutral pH are indicative of
pollution. Water with a pH less than 6.5 is
corrosive and could remove metals, such as lead,
from pipe.
High alkaline waters are unpalatable.
Hard waters require large amounts of soap to
produce foam or lather. Hard water toughens
vegetables cooked in it, and forms scales in
boilers, water heaters, pipes, and utensils.
*U.§. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards (1962)
Recommended limit should not be exceeded where other more suitable supplies are or can be made available.
Mandatory limit, when exceeded, constitutes grounds for rejection of the supply.
**Range depends on temperature
***Proposed for 1975 Federal Drinking Water Standards
-------
TABLE II
EXTENT OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH
1962 USPHS DRINKING WATER STANDARDS
SAMPLES WHOSE MINIMUM
SAMPLES FAILING DWS SAMPLES FAILING DWS DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
ANALYSES*
RECOMMENDED LIMIT
MANDATORY LIMIT
THAN THE DWS
SUBSTANCE
REPORTED
NO.
%
NO.
%
NO.
%
ABS
354
1
0.3
Arseni c
566
5
0.9
22
3.9
Barium
502
Cadmium
594
7
1.2
Chloride
684
n
1.6
Chromium
598
2
0.3
Copper
615
CCE
83
3
3.6
Cyanide
297
21
7.1
109
36.7
Flouride**
664
Iron
684
59
8.6
Lead
592
2
0.3
1
0.2
Manganese
669
5.8
8.7
6
0.9
Mercury
512
13
2.5
38
7.4
Nitrate
640
Selenium
418
1
0.2
Si 1ver
485
2
0.4
Sulfate
625
21
3.4
TDS
615
68
11.1
Zinc
591
* Total sampling points - 735
** DWS varies with temperature and not flagged
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALVSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ <250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05»
CONNECTICUT
BRIDGEPORT HYDRAULIC COMPANY
BANBURY
GROTON WATER OEPT
HARTFORD*METROPOLITAN DISTR. COMM OF H)
NEW HAVEN WATER CO
NEW LONDON WATER DEPT
STAMFORD WATER CO
WATERBURY WATER DEPT
WINDSOR LOCKS(BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL All
MAX IMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 9
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0010.
<0.000
<0.090
000.8
00.00
<0.000
<0.000
<0.003
0016.
<0.000
<0.010
<001.0
00. 00
<0.000
<0.040
<0. 000
0012.
<0.000
<0.020
<001.0
00.10
<0.000
<0.000
0005.
<0.000
<0.000
001.2
00.00
<0.006
<0.190
<0.000
0004.
<0.000
0.000
<000.9
00.00
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0010.
<0.000
<0.020
<000.9
00.20
<0.000
<0.050
<0.000
0015.
<0.000
<0.020
<001.0
00.10
<0.000
<0.020
<0.000
0009.
<0.000
<0.170
001.1
00.30
0.000
0015.
0.000
0.079
00.20
0.00b
0.190
0.003
0016.
0.000
0.170
001.2
00.30
0.000
0.000
o.coo
0004.
0.000
0.000
000.8
00.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
7
9
9
9
9
0
8
0
9
<0.005
<0.010
<0.020
0.000
<0.010
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0.000
0.020
0.000
0
0
0
9
MAINE
BANGOR WATER 01 STRICT
0010.
0.000
000.2
00.00
BAR HARBOR WATER COMPANY
0010.
o.ooo
000.1
00.04
BUCKS PORT WATER COMPANY
0010.
0.000
000.2
00.06
PORTLAND WATER DISTRICT
0010.
0.000
000.2
00.04
SEARSPORT WATER DISTRICT
0010.
0.000
000.2
00.04
WISCASSET WATER COMPANY
0010.
0.000
o
o
•
00.46*
MAX IMUM
0010.
0.000
000.2
00.13
00.46
MINIMUM
0010.
0.000
000. 1
00. 13
00.00
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NO.FAILING 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NO. ANALYZED
0
0
0
6
0
6
0
5
1
6 0
STATE TOTAL 6
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENOEO LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 1
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
MANGANESE MFRCURY NITKATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ O.Oli 0.05» 250.* 5.# 500.*
CONNECTICUT
<0.120?
<0.002
000.4
<0.002
<0.000
<0006.
<0.380
022.0
0046.
07.10
<0.000
<0.001
000.4
<0.003
<0.000
<0018.
<0.020
026.0
0051.
07.10
<0.120?
<0.001
000.0
<0.004
<0.000
<0006.
<0.010
015.0
0029.
07. 10
0.030
<0.000
000.4
015.0
0024.
07.40
<0.030
<0.000
000.3
<0.001
<0.000
<0003.
<0.020
007.0
0024.
06.30
<0.050
0.000
000.0
<0.001
<0.000
<0004.
<0.010
008.0
0016.
07.10
0.020
<0.004?
000.2
<0.002
<0.000
<0009.
<0.400
021.0
0050.
06.80
0.090*
<0.000
000.4
<0.002
<0.000
<0003.
<0.020
016.0
0032.
06.90
0.025
0.000
005.8
0.000
0014.
0100.
0.028
053.0
0092.
07.70
0. 120
0.004
005.8
0.004
0.000
0018.
0100.
0.400
053.0
0092.
07.70
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.001
0.000
0003.
0100.
0.010
007.0
0016.
06.30
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
7
a
8
1
8
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
0905780150000
0916660150000
0930950150000
0933660150000
0947260150000
0947600150000
0977180150000
098 7040150000
0994860199700
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING »
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
MAINE
0.000
004.5
0050.
07.60
0032.
2303450150000
0.000
004.5
0050.
07.40
0015.
2303600150000
0.000
004.5
0050.
07.60
0021.
2310800150000
0.000
004.5
005.3
0050.
07.30
0047.
2369010150000
0.000
004. 5
0050.
07.30
0005.
2376350150000
0.160*
004.5
0050.
07.00
2 399000150000
0. 160
004. 5
005. 3
0050.
07.60
0047.
MAXIMUM
0.000
004.5
005. 3
0050.
07.00
0005.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING »
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
6
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
6
5
NO. ANALYZED
6
STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
rtUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ I.OS 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 03.5* 00.3* 0.05$
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON
0.000
0.000
0.000
0012.
0.000
0.040
000.0
00.20
00.08
0.000
CHELSEA
0.000
0.000
0.000
0011.
0.000
0.020
000.0
00.00
00.14
0.000
EVERETT
0.000
0.000
0.000
0008.
0.000
0. 160
0.010
00.00
00.15
0.000
FALL RIVES WATER WORKS
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
0015.
0.000
0.030
000.0
00.00
00.15
0.000
FALMOUTH WATER DEPT.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.030
000.0
00.20
00.00
0.010
NEW BEDFORD
0.000
0.000
0.000
0012.
0.000
0.060
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.220$
QUINCY
0.000
0.000
0.000
0011 .
0.000
0.340
000.0
00.00
00.20
0.130$
REVERE
0.000
0.000
0.000
0011.
0.000
0. 150
000.0
00.20
00.20
0.010
SALEM-BEVERLY WATER SUPPLY BOARD
0.000
0.000
0.000
0045.
0.000
0.020
001.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
SOMERSET
0.000
0.000
0.000
0010.
o.ooo
0.000
001. 1
00.00
00.05
0.000
SPRINGFIELD
0.000
0.000
0.000
0011.
o.ooo
0.300
000.0
00.10
00.08
0.000
TEMPLETON WATER DEPARTMENT
0.000
0.000
0.000
0010.
o.ooo
0.290
001.0
00.00
0.000
TISBURY
0.000
0.000
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.400
000.0
00.00
00.13
0.010
WEYMOUTH
0.000
0.000
0.000
0016.
0.000
0.150
000.7
00.00
00.03
0.000
WORCESTER
0.000
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.060
000.0
00.00
00.06
0.000
MAX I MUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0045.
0.000
0.400
0.010
001. 1
00.20
00.20
0.220
MINIMUM
0.000
o.ooo
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
0.010
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
14
14
15
15
STATE TOTAL 15
NEW HAMPSHIRE
MANCHESTER WATER WORKS
PORTSMOUTH WATER WORKS
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 2
0018.
0028.
0028.
0018.
0
0
0
z
<0.100?
0.100
0.100
0
0
1
1
<0. 100
<0. 100
0. 100
0. 100
0
0
0
2
<000.I
<000.1
000.1
000.1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
<00.10
<00.10
00.10
00. 10
0
0
0
2
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE OR INKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE; 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
MANGANESE W5RCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7i 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
MASSACHUSETTS
0.020
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0006.
0006.
0. 140
008.0
0014.
06.70
0050.
250799 0150000
0.010
0.000
000.3
0.000
0006.
000 7.
0. 190
003.0
0014.
06.80
0060.
2 513150150000
0.000
000.2
o.ooo
0005.
0008.
0.000
008.0
0013.
06.60
0060.
2525180150000
0.020
0.000
000.0
0.000
0017.
0011.
0.020
004.0
0017.
06.40
0070.
2525500150000
0. 000
0.000
000.0
0007.
0000.
0.010
007.0
0009.
06.60
0030.
2525680150000
0.030
0.000
000 . 0
0.000
0007.
0007.
0.010
006.0
0010.
06.90
0080.
2550320150000
0.000
0.000
000. 3
0005.
0005.
011.0
0014.
06.50
OilO.
2563430150000
0.000
0.000
000.3
0000.
0005.
4.000
007.0
0016.
06.30
0080.
2564270150000
0.070*
o.ooo
000.3
0.000
0021.
0026.
0.050
027.0
0067.
06.80
0180.
2566810150000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0008.
0023.
004.0
0021.
06.70
0130.
2570730150000
0.020
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0006.
0005.
0.050
007.0
0012.
06.10
0063.
2578200150000
0.020
0.000
000.5
0.000
0011.
0005.
0.010
012.0
0036.
06.10
0089.
2580930150000
0.020
0.000
000.0
0.0
0014.
0028.
0.010
012.0
0021.
06.70
0046.
2581450150000
0.020
0.000
000.3
0.000
0009.
0026.
0.090
011.0
00 35.
06.30
0128.
2593170150000
0.020
0.000
000.2
0.000
0005.
0007.
0.010
010.0
0014.
07.60
0063.
2596220150000
0.070
0.000
000.5
0.000
0021.
0028.
4.000
027.0
0067.
07.60
0180.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
oooo.
0000.
0.000
004.0
0009.
06. 10
0030.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
15
14
15
0
0
11
15
15
13
15
15
15
15
NO. ANALYZEO
15
STATE TOTAL
NEW HAMPSHIRE
<0.050
0.080*
o.oao
0.050
1
0
0
2
000.1
<000.1
000. 1
000.1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
013.0
OIL.O
0048.
00*0.
013.0 0048.
011.0 0040.
06.70
06.60
06.70
06.60
0
0
0
2
3348000150000
3369000150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING t
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THF DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN JATE 04-0 1-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
O.OS$ 1.0$ .0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5# 00.3* 0.05$
RHODE ISLAND
BRISTOL COUNTY WATER COMPANY
<0.010
<0.200
<0.002
0024.
<0.020
0.010
0.000
00 1. 1
00.03
00.02
<0.010
BRISTOL COUNTY WATER CO.(GROUND WATER )
<0.015?
<0.200
<0.002
0069.
<0.020
0.010
000.9
00. 05
00. 08
<0.020
EAST PROVIDENCE
0.001
0017.
0.010
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.00
0.009
NEWPORT tut! TREATMENT PLANT)
<0.005
<0.020
0.000
0047.
0.000
0. 130
<0.020?
000.9
00.04
00.08
0.000
NEWPORT -WATER WORKS
<0.005
<0. 02 0
0. 000
0031.
0.017
0.020
<0.020?
001.0
00.01
00.08
0.000
NORTH TIVERTOWNINORTH TIVERTON FIRE DI)
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.022
0.000
000.9
00.01
00.32
0.000
PROVIDENCE
<0.020?
<0.200
<0.002
0016.
<0.020
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.02
<0.020
WAKEFIELD WATER COMPANY
<0.010
<0.100
<0.002
00 20.
<0.020
0.090
000.1
00.06
00.08
<0.020
CITY Of WARWICK
MAXIMUM
0. 020
0.200
0.002
006 9.
0.020
0.130
0.020
001.1
00.0 6
00.32
0.020
MINIMUM
0.005
0.020
0.000
00 14.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.1
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING «
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
7
7
8
8
8
8
5
8
8
8
8
STATF TOTAL 9
VERMONT
BURLINGTON WATER
DEPARTMENT
0.000
0.100
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.600
0.020*
002.3
00.00
00.20
0.000
RUTLAND WATER DEPT.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0009.
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.14
0.000
SOUTH BURLINGTON
WATER OF PARTMEN
0.000
0.000
0.000
0010.
0.000
0. 000
000.9
00.00
00.00
0.000
WHITE RIVER JUNCTI ONI HA RTFORO WATER DE)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.100
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.600
0.020
002.3
00.00
00.20
0.000
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
0.020
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
4
4
4
4
4
4
I
4
4
4
4
STATE TOTAL
4
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT I-S HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO . 01
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS 10 NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.~ 5.* 500.*
RHODE ISLAND
0. 010
<0.002
000.0
<0.010
0009.
0048.
0.000
018.0
0080.
06.60
0155.
4415400150000
0.010
<0.002
000.0
<0.020
0032.
094 7.
0.000
031.0
0120.
OS. 20
0314 .
441S4001S0001
0.000
000.0
0.010
0008.
0914.
0.000
014.0
0032.
10.00
0075.
4425210150000
0.000
0.001
001.3
1.400$
<0.005
0.000
0019.
0933.
0.080
023.0
0070.
08.00
0170.
4460200150000
0. 070*
<0.001
001.3
0.800$
<0.005
0.000
0010.
0929.
0.020
022.0
0066.
03.40
0143.
4460200150001
0.000
<0.001
000.0
<0.005
<0.020
0008.
OOll.
0.031
007.0
0020.
07.20
0053.
4461620150000
0.000
<0.001
000.0
<0.020
0007.
0013.
0.000
012.0
0032.
10.00
0069.
447 L400150000
0.050
<0.002
015.4
<0.020
0007.
0037 •
<0.010
014.0
0076.
06.00
0153.
4482600150000
4486800150000
0.070
0.002
015.4
1.400
0.005
0.0 20
00 32.
0048.
0.080
031.0
0120.
10.00
0314.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.001
000.0
0.800
0.005
0.000
0007.
OOll.
0.000
007.0
0020.
06 .00
0053.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
8
7
8
2
3
8
8
8
8
a
8
8
8
NO. ANALYZED
9
STATE TOTAL
VERMONT
0.010
0.000
000.3
0.400
0.005
0.000
0009.
0C26.
0.000
046.0
0074.
07.40
0102.
5010080150000
0.010
0.000
000.3
0.000
0005.
0.400
026.0
0054.
07.20
5066060150000
0.000
0,000
000.3
0.000
0005.
0.000
044.0
0070.
07.40
5070850150000
0.180*
0.000
000. 1
o.ooo
0005.
o.ooo
087.0
0096.
07.50
5093520150000
o. iao
0.000
000.3
0.400
0.005
0.000
0009.
0 026.
0.400
087.0
0096.
07.50
0102.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000. 1
0.400
0.005
O.OOQ
0005.
0 026.
0.000
026.0
0054.
07.20
0102.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
i
4
4
4
4
1
NO. ANAL-tlED
4 STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENOEO LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 6
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
LOCATION
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.05$
MAXIMUM
0.020
0.200
0.003
0089.
0. 100
0.600
0.02 0
002.3
00.20
00.46
0.220
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0004.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO.FAILING ?
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
34
33
36
44
37
44
7
41
27
44
36
REGION TOTAL
45
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MIMIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 7
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS Of CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 01
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0 .002$
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7 $
SELENIUM
0.01J
SILVER
0.05S
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL HARDNESS PH
TOS
500.*
ID NO.
0.180
0.004
015.4
1.400
0.005
0.020
0032.
0100.
4.000
087.0
0120.
13.00
0314.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.400
0.001
0.000
0000.
0000.
0.000
004.0
0009.
06.00
0005.
b
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
34
44
3
11
31
35
25
33
39
44
44
29
45
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING t
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING MATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM OETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
R6SULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
RUN OATr 04 - J i-75 INTERSTATE CARRIES WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
L'.ICAT ION
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01$ 250.« 0.05$ I.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.05$
^ t rt JERSEY
ATLANTIC CITY WATER UTILITY
BAYONNE
8RIDOG TON WATER DEPT.
CAMDEN
DEEP WATERit. I. DUPONT DE N^OU-^S)
DENVILLE TOWNSHIP WATE" J£pT.
ELIZABETH
ELIZABETHTQWN WATER COMPANY
ELMWOOD PARK WATER. DEPARTMENT
GARFIELD WATFR DEPARTMENT
&LUXSSTFP ( CI TY WATER 05PT.1
HADDJN HEIGHTStN.J. WATE!"' C J.
HALEOON WATcC dept.
HOBDKEN
JERSEY CITY WATER DEPT.
KEARNY WATER DFPT.
N. J. WATER CD. (LAKEW01!) OISTRI
LITTLE FALLS!PASSAIC VALLEY WATER
LOWER TWP { TOW NSHIP OF L0WFR MUNI.
MAHWAH WATER DEPT
MERCHANTVILLE PSNNSAUKEN WATER C
MOUNT HOLLY WATER CO
NEWARK WATER DEPT.
MEW MlLFQRQtHACKfNSACK WATFR CO.)
N. J. WATER CO. IGCfeAN CITY OIST
PAULS fiDPU WATER DEPT
PAUL S BCF 0(MU8IL t OIL CO., INC.)
PERTH AMBQV
PITMAN WATER DEPT.
PRINCETON WATER CO.
SHftEWStJl/o Y{ MUNMQUTH CONS JL I OATcD
SOMER VILLE WATER COMPANY
SPOTShOOD WATER DEPT.
TRENTON WATER DEPT.
WANAQUE(NORTH JERSEY OIST.
WESTVILLEITEXACO, INC.)
WOOQBRI OGE (MIOOL&SEX WATER
WRIUHTSTOWN M.U.A.
WP. IGHTS TOWN C DOBBS HOUSF INC.l
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
(HADDON I
COMM)
UTlt I
WATOLI
WRT SUPPLY )
COMPANY)
0.000 0.000 o.ooo
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOL
0.003
0.300
0 . 500
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.005
0.060
0.000
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0. 000
0.300
0.000
0.000
0 .000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.003
<0.005
0.060
0.000
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOU
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0 .000
0.300
o.ooo
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0006.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0012.
0026.
0.005
0023.
0.000
0.000
0035.
0.000
0016.
o.ooo
0.000
00 15.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0066.
0066.
o.ooo
0023.
0.000
0.000
0009.
0.000
0017.
0.000
0.070
0028.
o.ooo
0.000
o.ooo
0031.
0.000
0.000
0.00 7
00 12.
0.000
0.000
<0.02 07
000 3.
0.000
0.026
<0.020?
002 1.
0.000
<0.015
<0.02 0?
0015.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0024.
0004.
0.000
0.000
0.007
0004.
0012.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
<0010.
0.000
0.005
0.020*
0037.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0144.
0.000
0.000
0.007
0015.
0.000
0.270
0.000
JO 30.
0009.
0027.
0.000
0.070
0.000
0016.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0013.
0017.
0.000
0.050
0.000
0004.
0.000
0. 040
0.000
0019.
0.000
0.008
0024.
0006.
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
0.000
001.3
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.2
<000.1
000.1
000.2
000.1
000.0
ooo.o
000.0
000.2
000.0
000. 1
000.3
002.2
000.0
001.2
001.4
000.0
000.1
000.0
000.0
000.0
000.0
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00. oo
00. 00
00.00
00.00
00.00
<00.25
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
<00.25
00.00
00.00
00.00
00. 00
00.oo
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.20
00.00
00.50*
00.40*
00.00
00.20
0 0.20
00.30
00.00
00.00
00.03
00.00
00.20
00.00
00.10
00.00
00.00
00.00
00. 10
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.30
01.70*
00.06
02.00*
00.00
00.60*
00.00
00.00
00.30
00.50*
00.20
00.20
00.00
04.50*
00.20
00.50*
00.20
0.010
0.017
0.000
0.003
0.003
0. 000
0.000
0.007
0.008
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.044
0.005
0.000
0. 000
0.002
0.000
0.002
0.003
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.002
0.007
0.005
.... . - tMr rue noToizrK'f wATPR STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
-------
RUN OATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS 10 NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.*
500.
NEW JERSEY
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.001
0.000
0006.
0010.
0.000
035.0
0.000
0.000
.000.0
0.000
0004.
0014.
0.000
027.0
0.000
033.2
0005.
0001.
0.024
006.6
0056.
0050.
152.0
0.000
0.000
008.9
0.000
0.000
00 38.
0056.
0.320
072.0
0.000
ooa. 8
0005.
0023.
118.0
0.000
0.000
004.4
0.000
0.000
0007.
0034.
0.000
043.0
0.000
0.000
004.4
0.000
0.000
0006.
0034.
0.020
037.0
0.200*
006. 6
0027.
0057.
134.0
0.200*
006.6
0027.
0057.
134.0
0.000
o.ooo
022.0
0.000
0.000
0013.
0026.
0.000
085.0
0.000
000.0
0006.
0033.
008.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0023.
0034.
0.000
05 8.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0012.
0021.
0.000
028.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.300 <0.005
0.000
0012.
002 0.
0.120
028.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
<0.005
0.000
0003.
0016.
0.000
022.0
0.000
<0.001
000.0
<0.005
0.000
0003.
0015.
0.023
085.0
0.000
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0014.
0030.
0.022
027.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
00 29.
0004.
0.030
120.0
0.000
000.0
0010.
0019.
045.0
0.000
0.000
013.3
0.000
0.000
0006.
0004.
0.060
021.0
0.000
000.0
0005.
0020.
094.0
0.240*
0.000
000.0
0.000
o.ooo
0004.
0013.
0.000
021.0
0.000
<0.001
004.4
<0.005-
0.000
0024.
0042.
0.022
078.0
0.010
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0.032
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0015.
0034.
0.120
036.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0128.
0006.
0.110
106.0
0.010
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0005.
0029.
0.125
028.0
0.000
000.0
0088.
0004.
206.0
0.000
006.6
0008.
0024.
130.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0008.
0035.
0.300
038.0
0.000
0.000
004.4
0.000
0.000
0007.
003L.
0.050
030.0
0.000
011.0
0009.
0027.
025.0
0. 000
0.000
004.4
0.000
0.000
0006.
0048.
0.025
060.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0003.
0013.
0.025
019.0
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0028.
0043.
0.060
0.000
019.9
0019.
163.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0002.
0009.
0.070
100.0
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0002.
0013.
0.060
078.0
0036. 08.00 0102. 3403000150000
0038. 07.40 0076. 3404950150000
0015. 05.30 0074. 3410500150000
0086. 06.70 0274. 3412600150000
0078. 07.20 0228. 3420250L50000
0150. 07.70 0282. 3421460150000
0078. 07.50 0150. 3423700150000
0072. 07.50 0156. 3423710150000
0190. 07.20 0344. 3423860150000
0190. 07.20 0344. 3428350150000
0082. 06.80 0156. 3430000150000
0092. 06.80 0114. 3432700150000
0051. 06.90 0140. 3433020150000
0048. 06.60 0130. 3436750150000
0060, 06.60 0110. 3436700150000
0030. 07.10 0048. 3439470150000
0028. 06.90 0084. 3441410150000
0050. 07.00 0116. 3444860150000
0070. 08.10 0162. 3446230150000
0062. 06.90 0110. 344 7250150000
0026. 06.70 0066. 3450260150000
0082. 07.30 0118. 3455500150000
0042. 06.70 0102. 3456700150000
0124. 07.30 0258. 345 7900150000
07.40 0122. 3460750150000
0060. 06.00 0134. 3464500150000
0004. 07.00 0356. 3464500199800
0064. 06.40 0102. 3465850150000
0018. 07.80 0332. 3466600150000
0124. 07.40 0224. 3469300150000
0079. 06.50 0166. 3477570150000
0074. 06.50 0124. 3478600150000
0062, 07.00 0098. 3480400150000
0096. 08.00 0176. 3485500150000
0026. 06.40 0084. 348 7600150000
0058. 06.20 0156. 3490000150000
0280. 07.70 0372. 3492260150000
0100. 07.10 0156. 3493150150000
0090. 06.80 0100. 3493150199900
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRIMKING WATER STANOARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRiER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIOE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 253.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
NEW JERSEY
MAXIMUM
0.005
0.060
0.003
0144.
0.000
0.270
0.020
002.2
00.25
0*. 50
0.044
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0003.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
8
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAIL-ING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
27
27
27
39
27
27
26
38
38
39
27
STATE TOTAL 39
NEW YORK
ALBANY
0009.
<000.1
<00.10
00.08
AUBURN
0. 000
0. 02 3
0.000
oooa.
<0.004
0.006
<0.010
000.1
00.02
00.02
<0.004
BATAVIA
0.001
0.100
0.000
0024.
<0.001
0.000
0.000
001.2
00.00
00.02
0.002
BINGHAMTON
0010.
00.02
BREWSTER VILLAGE
0.006
0.059
0.000
0043.
0.008
0.008
0.010
000.8
01.10*
0.008
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHOR ITY(WOODLAWN 4)
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY! lnlOODLAWN W)
<0.010
<0. 1.00
<0.001
0032.
<0.020
<0.100
<0.0207
001.1
<00.01
00.01
<0.030
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY(STURG POINI
<0.010
<0.200
<0.001
0031.
<0.020
<0.050
<0.020?
001 .0
<00.01
<00.01
<0.020
buffalo
<0.010
<0.200
<0.002
0025.
<0.003
<0.050
<0.02 0?
<00I.1
00.01
00. 19
0.030
CLINTON VILLAGE
0.000
0.097
o.ooo
0023.
0.009
0.019
001.0
00.04
0.007
COXSACKIE VILLAGE
0006.
00. 18
CRQT ON-ON—HU3S0N
0015.
0.040
000.1
00.02
EAST SYRACUSE(ONONDAGA COUNTY W. AUTH.I
0009.
00.14
FREDONIA
0.000
0.051
0.000
0009.
<0.002
0.001
O.OLO
000.2
00.17
<0.002
HIGHLAND WATER DISTRICT
0015.
00.04
HUDSON
0010.
00.20
JAMAICA WATER SUPPLY CO.
0027.
000.8
00. 16
JOHNSON CITY
0069.
00.01
KINGSTON
0.001
0.006
0.000
0001.
0.005
0.005
0.000
000.0
00.05
0.001
LIBERTY VILLAGE
0027.
<00.02
NEWTONVILLEUATHAM WATER DISTRICT)
0023.
00.08
NFW YORK CITY
0.001
0.050
0.000
0005.
0.000
0.050
0.001
000.9
00.01
00.03
0.010
NIAGARA FALLS
0.000
0.024
0.002
0025.
0.002
0.010
001.0
OO.OO
0.002
OAKDALE(SJFFU LK CO. W A(BABYLON I I
0003.
<00.02
00.20
OAKDALEISUFFOLK CO. WA(PATCHOQUE))
<0.020?
<0.500
<0.005
0008.
<0.010
<0.050
<0.010
<000.1
<00.02
00.05
<0.010
OAKDALEISUFFOLK CO. WAIPGRT JEFFERSON))
0014.
<00.02
00.15
~ LEAN
0015.
001.0
00.07
NOTe: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
MATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 11
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 SntSsTATE SlE^A^
REGION NO. 02
manganese mercury nitrate cce selenium silver sodium sulfate zinc alkal hardness ph T0|00.«
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.
NEW JERSEY
0.240
0.000
3
0
0
38
0.001
0.000
0
0
0
27
033.2
000.0
0
0
0
39
0.300
0.300
0
0
0
1
0.005
0.000
0
0
0
25
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
27
012a.
0002.
0
0
0
38
7.
0.320
206.0
0280.
08.10
1.
0.000
008.0
0004.
05.30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
27
36
38
39
0372.
0048.
0
0
0
39
39
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
NEW YORK.
<0.010
<000.1
<0. 020
001.4
0.020
000.8
0.050
000.1
0.250#
0.001
000.8
<0.050
<0.002
<000«.2
<0.050
<0.001
<000.2
<0.040
<0.001
000.2
0.007
<0.005?
004.3
0.010
0.050
000.2
<0.020
001-3
<0.002
<0.001
000.9
0.020
000.5
0.070*
000.3
0.064*
022.3
0.010
001.4
0.020
0.001
000. 1
0.020
0.037
0.030
<0.001
000.9
0.002
0.000
001.3
<0.010
<000.1
0.020
<0.004?
007.6
0.000
0.010
000.5
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.002
<0.010
<0.010
<0.001
0.004
0.000
0.000
<0.001
0.001
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.005
0006.
0004.
0009.
0005.
ooia.
0013.
0016.
0011.
0014.
0008.
0025.
0021.
0057.
0047.
0034.
0028.
002 5.
0074.
0.000
0.000
0.350
<0.100
<0.100
0.220
0.020
0006.
0.000
<0.001
0009.
0031.
0.010
0051.
0029.
0.000
0.000
0002.
0010.
0.028
0019.
0.002
0.000
0003.
0011.
0.020
0.000
0.000
0010.
0021.
0.010
0003.
0006.
<0.005
<0.020
0006.
0007.
0.050
0010.
0017.
032.0
0046.
08.90
0160.
116.0
0139.
0157.
02^.0
0082.
07.80
0141.
058.0
0076.
07.20
169.0
0245.
07.20
090.0
0129.
07.87
0214.
089.0
0140.
07.80
0223.
090.0
0124.
08.20
0225.
249.0
4300.
07.50
0460.
050.0
0048.
09.00
027.0
0128.
07.30
126.0
0138.
08.40
075.0
0150.
07.70
0135.
050.0
0098.
07.10
045.0
0055.
07.10
071.7
0154.
06.50
0287.
270.0
0251.
07.30
084.0
0250.
10.60
0031.
027.0
0054.
06.30
075.0
0136.
07.89
009.0
0017.
06.90
0042.
065.0
0085.
07.80
0156.
02 5.0
0026.
07.30
0050.
033.0
0042.
07.00
0103.
027.0
0050.
07.00
0113.
081.0
0092.
06.80
3600600150000
3603700150000
3605200150000
3607050150000
3609250150000
3610250150000
3610250150001
3610250150002
3610250151000
3616600150000
3619600150000
3620200150000
3625300150000
3630150150000
3638070150000
3640050150000
3641610150000
3642550150000
3643950150000
3646850150000
3658150150000
3658250150000
3658350150000
3660750150000
3660750151000
3660750152000
3661400150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANOARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
HATER STANDARDS MANOATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 12
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
interstate carrier water supplies
REGION NO. 02
LOCATION
N£* YORK
ONEONTA
CITY Of GSrtEGQ MUM CI PAL w AT eft S
PEEKSK.ILL
RENSSELAtR
ROCHESTFK BUREAU OF WATrB
ROCHtSTFK BUREAU OF W AT E* (HEMLOCK LAKE)
ROME
SCHENECTADY
SYRACUSE
TOWN OF TJNAWANDA WATER TREAT. P
UTICA
kJHITF plains
YONKERS
MAXIMUM
MINI MUM
NO. FAIL-IMG *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
STATE TOTAL 40
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
0.025
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01$ 25-).* 0.05$ I.*
<0.030?
0.010
0. 000
<0.009
0.000
0.012
<0.005
0.02 L
<0.0207 <0.100
0.004 0.012
<0.009
0.001
<0. 001
0.000
0002.
0031.
0055.
0006.
0034.
0016.
0002.
0020.
0006.
0027.
0003,
0006.
0060.
0.030
0.500
0.009
0069.
0.000
0.005
0. 000
0001.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
19
IB
16
39
0.003
<0.040
<0.040
0.001
<0.009
<0.004
<0.020
0.001
0.040
0.000
0
0
0
19
0.015
0. 060
0. 080
0. 110
0. 170
0.005
<0.050
0. 009
0. 170
0.000
0
0
0
Hi
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.2$ 00.5*
000.3
000.4
001.0
001. 1
000. 1
000.1
000.6
000.2
001.4
000.4
000.9
<0.010
<0.010
0.000
<0.009
0.000
<0.020?
0.010
0.020
0.000
0
0
4
18
001.4
000.0
0
0
0
27
00.17
00.02
00.01
00.02
00.17
00.00
0
0
0
14
IRON
00.3*
00. 10
00.30
00.04
00.04
00.02
00.06
00. 12
<00.05
00. 16
<00.02
00.26
00.04
00.08
01. 10
00.00
1
0
0
39
LEAD
0.05$
0.004
0.004
<0.009
<0.004
<0.030
0.001
0.030
0.001
0
0
0
18
PUERTO RICO
HO. LAS MAREASIPHILLIPS P.R. CJRE INT1
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. failing $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL I
<0.005 <0.050
0. 005
0.005
0
0
0
1
0.050
0.050
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0035.
0035.
0035.
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.030 0.020* 000.2 00.27 00.05 0.000
0.030
0.030
0
0
0
1
0.020
0.020
1
0
0
1
000.2
000.2
0
0
0
1
00.27
00.27
0
0
0
1
00.05
00.05
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FARING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANOAROS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER. SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500. *
NEW YORK
0.050
000.2
0002.
013.0
0030.
06.80
3661700150000
0.010
001.3
0014.
0O29.
0.020
094.0
0150.
08.30
3662550150000
0.000
000.5
0005.
040.0
0060,
07.30
3664400150000
0.020
000.1
0043.
033.0
0053.
08.60
3670000150000
<0.010
<0.002
0013.
075.0
0135.
07. 15
0224.
3671050150000
0.030
<0.002
0024.
062.0
0082.
08.00
0124.
3671050150001
0.020
0.000
002.3
0.007
0.0 00
0001.
0 307.
0.220
014.0
0028.
06. BO
0094.
3671750150000
<0.009
<0.003?
<000.4
<0.009
<0.009
0010.
0010.
<0.009
152.0
0170.
07.60
0248.
3675350150000
0.020
002.7
0.001
<0.001
0021.
0.020
098.0
1160.
08.50
0141.
3683600150000
<0.040
<0.002
<000.2
<0.010
<0.050
0031.
<0.100
090.0
0132.
07.60
0223.
3685000150000
0.054
0.001
003.8
o.ooo
0.000
0001.
0007.
0.058
000.0
0016.
06.30
0033.
3686 750150000
<0.050
009.0
0018.
06.40
3693500150000
0.020
000.5
062.0
0110.
06.70
3695450150000
0.250
0.005
022.3
0.000
0.010
0.050
0029.
0074.
0.350
270.0
4300.
10.60
0460.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0006.
0.000
000.0
0016.
06.30
0031.
MINIMUM
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
39
14
32
2
19
17
27
24
18
39
39
38
22
NO. ANALYZED
40
STATE TOTAL
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
002.5
002.5
002.5
0
0
0
1
0.100 <0.005
0.100
0.100
0
0
0
1
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0031.
0031.
0031.
0
0
0
1
0034.
0034.
0034.
0
0
0
1
0.030
0.030
0.030
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0162.
0162.
0162.
0
0
0
1
08.04 0304.
08.04
08.04
0304.
0304.
PUERTO RICO
7239610150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
* INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN U AT E 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER MATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ I.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
VIRGIN ISLANDS
ST. CPOIXIMARRIOTT-IN—FLIGHT SERVICES )
<0.005 <0.050 0.000 0084.
0.000
0.260 <0.020? 000.2
<00.25
00.01
0.000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FA ILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
1
0.050
0.050
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0084.
0084.
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.260
0.260
0
0
0
1
0.020
0.020
0
0
1
I
000.2
000,
00.25
00.25
0
0
0
1
00.01
00.01
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
MAXIMUM
0.030
0.500
0.009
0144.
0.040
0.270
0.020
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0001.
0.000
0.000
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
3
0
0
0
0
0
9
NO. ANALYZED
48
47
45
80
48
50
46
REGION TOTAL
81
002.2
000.0
0
0
0
67
00.27
00.00
0
0
0
54
04.50
00.00
9
0
0
80
0.044
0.000
0
0
0
47
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A P0SSI8LE FAILURE 6ECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 15
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 02
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
VIRGIN ISLANDS
0.000
<0.001
008.0
<0.005
0.000
0102.
0010.
2.70 a
034.2
0040.
06.60
0411.
7870000199900
0.000
0.001
008.0
0.005
0.000
0L02.
0010.
2.700
034.2
0040.
06.60
0411.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.001
008.0
0.005
0.000
0102.
0010.
2.700
034.2
0040.
06.60
0411.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NO. ANALYZED
I STATE TOTAL
0.250
0.005
033.2
0.300
0.010
0.050
0128.
0074.
2.700
270.0
4300.
10.60
0460.
0.000
O.OQO
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0001.
0.000
000.0
0004.
05.30
0031.
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
79
43
73
4
46
46
67
63
47
76
79
79
63
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
81 REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANOARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HMHER
PAGE 16
-------
RUM OATE 04-0 1-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
LLiCATIiJN ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CVANIQE FLUORIDE A8S IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
DELAWARE
DELAWARE (f>€TTY JIL COMPANY)
<0.005
<0.500
0.000
0023.
0.000
0. 150
<0.020?
000. 1
<00.25
O
o
o
0.000
LEWES
001. 0
NEWPORT(ARTESIAN WATER CO.)
0015.
0.050
00.00
00.00
STANTON(WILMINGTON SU OUR BAM
<0.005
<0.500
0.000
0020.
0.000
0. 190
<0.02 0?
000.8
<00.25
00. 15
0.000
WILMINGTiJN
0017.
00.80*
00.25
YORKL YN(GkEGG S BUS SERVICE)
<0.005
0.030
<0010.
0.000
0. 110
<0.020?
000.1
<00.25
00.11
0.000
MAX I MUM
0.005
0.500
0.000
0020.
o.uoo
0.190
0.020
001.0
00.80
00.25
0.000
MINIMUM
0.005
0.030
o.ooo
0010.
0.000
0.050
0.020
000.1
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
3
3
2
5
3
4
3
4
5
5
3
STATE TOTAL 6
D.C.
D IS TPICT OF COLUMBIA
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING i
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.000 0.000 0014.
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0014.
00 14.
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.010 0.000 000.9
0. 010
0.010
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
000,
000.
00.00 00.00 0.000
00.00
00.00
0
0
0
1
00.00
00.00
0
0
0
1
0.000
0. 000
0
0
0
1
MARYLAND
BALTIMORE CITYI ASHBURTON PLANT)
BRUNSWICK
CAMBRIDGE
CUMBERLAND
DEER PARK SPRING WATER BOTTLING
GLEN BURNIE(SAW MILL BRANCH PLAN
GLEN 8URNIE(DORSEY ROAD PLANT)
T )
0.000
<0.005
0.000
0.005
0.000
<0.050
0.050
<0.010 0011.
0.000
<0.010
<0.0L0
<0.010
<0.010
<0010.
0007.
0007.
0000.
0006.
0.000
0.000
<0.005
0.000
<0.010
0.000
0. 110 <0.260? 001.0 <00.10 00.05 <0.050
0.000 <0.020? <000.1 <00.25 00.32 0.000
0.000 <0.200? 001.1 <00.10 00.14 <0.010
0.003 <0.020? 000.1 00.10 00.05 <0.010
0.000 <000.1 <00.10 <00.05 <0.010
0.010 <0.200? 000.7 00.10 00.16 <0.010
NOTE; * IVDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DFINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A P0SSI8LE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALVSeS FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.002$
NIT RAT E
45. *
CCE
0.7*
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL HARDNESS PH
TDS
500.*
ID NO.
DELAWARE
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
004.2
0.016
<0.001
003.0
016.2
0.036
0.001
<001-0
0.036
0.001
016.2
0.000
0.001
001.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
5
<0.005
1.500$ 0.005
<0.005
1.500
L.500
0
1
0
1
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
3
0.000
0027.
<002 5.
0.015
06.60
0139.
06.90
0005.
030.0
0040.
07.20
0100.
0.000
0006.
0044.
0.150
06.90
0154.
050.0
0090.
07.50
0.000
0006.
0033.
0.500
07.20
0142.
0.000
0027.
0044.
0.500
050.0
0090.
08.60
0154.
0.000
0006.
0005.
0.015
030.0
0040.
06.90
0100.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
4
3
2
2
6
4
1015400150000
1037400150000
1052830150000
1063000150000
1068300150000
1072600150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.001
0.001
0.001
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
001.3
001.3
001.3
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0006.
0006.
0006.
0
0
0
1
0024.
0024.
0024.
0
0
0
1
0.002 054.0 0114.
0.002
0.002
0
0
0
1
054.0
054.0
0
0
0
1
0114.
0114.
0
0
0
1
07.90 0173.
07.90
07.90
0
0
0
1
0173.
0173.
0
0
0
1
D.C.
1150000150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING »
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
MARYLAND
0.000
<0.001
001. o-
<0.001
<0.010
0005.
0010.
0.040
050.0
0060.
07.30
0115.
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
0.400
<0.005
0.000
0002.
<0025.
0.033
0 7.40
0077.
0. 000
<0.500?
<000.1
<0.001
<0.010
0195.
0010.
0.020
03.50
0506.*
0.010
0.000
000.6
0.400
0.005
<0.010
0002.
0015.
0.020
07.50
0116.
0.000
<000.1
<0.010
0001.
0003.
<0.010
071.0
0068.
07.50
0086.
0. 000
<0.001
002.3
<0.001
<0.010
0002.
0005.
0.040
07.30
0058.
2403780150000
2412060150000
2414040150000
2423940150000
2425920150000
2437440150000
2437440150001
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER t' T
$ INQICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECT ABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
PUN DATS 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
LOCATION
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ l.Oi
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.014 250.* 0.05$ I.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE A6S
0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.05$
MAR V LAND
GLEN BURNIE(HARUNDALE PLANT )
GLEN BURN IE <6 SINGLE WELL PLANTS)
HAGERSTOrfNIPOTOMAC SUPPLY)
SPARROWS POINT!TOWN PLANT)
SPARROWS POItMTlWlRE 6 RDO MILL PLANT)
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALY7.E0
STATE TOTAL 12
o. ooo
0.000
0.010
0016.
0.000
0.200*
000.9
00.10
<00.05
0.000
0.000
0.010
0027.
0.000
0.200*
000.1
00.10
00.30
0.005
0.050
0.010
0027.
0.010
0. 110
0.260
001. L
00.25
00.32
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000.
0.000
o.ooo
0.020
000.1
00. 10
00.05
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
7
4
6
8
8
6
7
8
e
8
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.000
0
0
0
8
PENNSYLVANIA
ALT 30NA CITY AUTHORITY
BEAVER FALLS MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
BETHLEHEM MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS
BREEZEWOOD INC.
BROWNSVILLE BOROUGH(BROwNSVILLE WATER )
WESTERN PA. WATER CO.(BUTLER)
CHARLEROI(AUTHORITY OF THE BOROUGH OF )
CHESTER MUNICIPAL WAT ER WORKS
CORAOPCLIS
ERIE MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
FALLS T OWN SHIPIU.S. STEEL CORP.)
GREENSBURGIWESTMORELAND CO. MUNICIPAL )
GREENVILLclO.D. ANDERSON BUS CO.)
HANOVER
HARRISBURG
KUTZTOWN
LOWER SWATARA TWP.(HARPISBUKG INTL.ARP)
MOON TOWNSHIP
MORRISVILL EMUNlCIPAL WATERWORKS
PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPTtTORRESDALE FIL)
PHI LA. WATER DEPT.(BELMONT FILTRATION )
PHILADELPHIA WATER DEPT.(QUE EN LANE PLI
WESTERN PA. WATER CO. ( P I TTStJU^G I
<0.010
<0.050?
<0.005
<0.050?
<0.050?
0.005
<0.020?
<0.020?
<0.010
<0.010
<0.050?
<0.050?
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.500
0.170
<0.100
0.500
<0.500
<0.999
0.500
<0.005
0.050
<0.100
<0.999
<0.500
<0.100
<0.500
<0.999
<0.999
<0.999
o.oao
<0.500
<0.500
<0.500
<0.500
<0.500
<0.003
0.003
0.000
<0.005
<0.003
0.003
<0.003
<0.003
0.000
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
0.003
0.000
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
0.003
0.003
0007.
0037.
<0010.
0078.
0007.
0013.
0039.
0019.
0048.
0025.
0010.
0013.
0011.
0011.
0004.
0010.
0016.
0029.
0011.
0027.
0039.
0037.
0014.
<0.010
<0.010
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.010
<0.020
<0.010
0.000
<0.020
0.010
0.000
<0.020
<0.02 0
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.020
0.03 0
<0.030
0. 110
0. 170
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.030
0.026
<0.020
0.020
0.000
<0.020
<0.100
0.050
0.020
0.020
0.044
0.030
0.090
0.050
0.250
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
<0.02 0?
0.010
0.010
<0.001
<0.010
<0.010
0.020*
0.000
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
<0.010
<0. 020?
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<000.1
000.8
001.0
000.1
000.1
000.2
000. I
000.9
000.2
000. I
000.1
000.1
000.2
000.5
000.9
000.0
000.1
001.0
<000.1
000.9
000.8
000.8
001.1
03.00
00.08
<00.25
00.00
<00.00
00.00
00.00
00.03
<00.01
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
<00.25
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.03
00.10
00.06
00.11
00.13
00.08
00.04
00.06
00.05
00.51*
<00.02
00.30
00.03
00. 14
00.02
00.16
00.03
00.12
00.05
00.06
00.02
00.03
00.09
00.06
<0.050
<0.050
0.000
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.000
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
<0. 050
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.050
0.000
<0.050
<0.050
<0.010
<0.050
<0.050
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAKING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 19
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.0021
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7 S
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05S
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL HARDNESS PH
TOS
500.*
ID NO.
MARYLAND
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
8
<0.001
<0.001
0.500
0.000
0
0
1
7
000.0
000.0
002.3
000.0
0
0
0
8
0.400
0.400
0
0
0
2
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.000
0
0
0
7
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
8
0006.
0014.
0195.
0001.
0
0
0
8
0009.
0009.
002 5.
0003.
0
0
0
3
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.010
0
0
0
8
058.0 0114.
071.0
050.0
0
0
0
3
0114.
0060 .
0
0
0
3
243 7440150002
2437440150003
07.70 0178. 2440680150000
08.40 0118. 2485690150000
2485690150001
08.50 0506. MAXIMUM
07.30 0058. MINIMUM
0 I NO. FAILING *
0 0 NO. FAILING <
0 0 NO.FAILING ?
8 8 NO. ANALYZED
12 STATE TOTAL
0.010
<0.005?
000.5
<0.050
<0.005?
001.2
0.044
<0.001
<001.0
0.030
<0.005?
001.1
<0.030
<0.005?
000.6
<0.010
<0.005?
000.7
0. 040
<0.005?
000.6
0.010
<0.005?
004.6
0.360*
0.000
002.0
<0.010
<0.002
000.2
0.050
<0.005?
000.9
0.050
000.8
0.060*
<0.002
000. 1
0.100*
000.8
0.250*
000.1
0. 020
<0.005?
007.2
0. 060*
001.4
0.150*
0.001
001.0
0.010
<0.005?
000.8
0. 010
<0.005?
001.6
0.010
<0.005?
003.0
<0.010
0 .005$
003.1
0. 030
<0.005?
000.8
0.100 <0.005
PENNSYLVANIA
0003.
0.480
015.0
0029.
06.80
0086.
4201520150000
0015.
0102.
0.030
059.0
0192.
07.50
0386.
4205160150000
0.000
0002.
<002 5.
0.100
008.0
0012.
06.60
0036.
4206360150000
0.010
0009.
0.120
077.0
0165.
07.60
1298.*
4208800150000
0007.
0063.
<0.010
031.0
0078.
09.30
0188.
4209720150000
0006.
0012.
0.050
019.0
0057.
06.80
0164.
4210680150000
0008.
0031.
0.030
027.0
0093.
09.60
0282.
4212960150000
0005.
0012.
0.110
038.0
0088.
08.50
0184.
4213200150000
0.000
0130.
0180.
0.150
07.60
0498.
4216600150000
0011.
0040.
0.010
090.Q
0134.
07.80
0212.
4225440150000
0005.
0021.
0.030
034.0
0063.
07.40
0120.
4226750150000
0075.
0.000
037.0
0084.
06.40
0212.
4233440150000
0000.
0000.
0.010
157.0
00 74.
07.60
0224.
4233560150000
0018.
0.010
03B.4
0052.
07.40
4234520150000
0006.
0.080
009.0
0015.
08.60
4234840150000
0003.
0030.
<0.010
080.0
0246.
07.60
0276.
4243160150000
0013.
0147.
0.070
191.0
0360.
07.10
0490.
4248390150000
0041.
0116.
0.055
07.30
0250.
4255720150000
<0.010
0021.
0015.
0.150
056.0
0048.
07.20
0244.
4256080150000
<0.010
0009.
0018.
0.070
045.0
0096.
07.60
4265440150000
<0.010
0029.
0018.
0.110
062.0
0234.
07.50
0278.
4265440150001
0054.
0.210
051.0
0162.
07.10
0300.
4265440150002
0020.
0098.
0.045
037.0
0143.
07.20
0256.
4266080150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
% INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CAOMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
ABS
IRON
LEAD
0.051
1.0$
O.Oli
250.*
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
00. 5*
00.3*
0.05$
PENNSYLVANIA
PITTSbURG MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
<0.500
<0.003
0013.
0.020
<0.010
<0.010
000.7
00.00
00.07
<0.050
REAOING
<0.999
<0.003
0008.
<0.010
0.030
<0.010
000.6
<00.05
<0.050
SCRANTON(PACIFIC GAS AND WATER COMPANY)
0.010
<0.500
<0.003
0010.
0.010
0.770
<000.1
00.00
00.51*
<0.050
SHARPSVILLE(»ORTNEK (JUS CO.)
<0.010
<0.100
<0.003
0.020
0.000
000.0
00.07
<0.050
SPRINGFIFLlHPHILA. SUBURBAN nATfcR CO.)
<0.500
<0.003
0018.
<0.001
0. 120
<0.010
000.8
00.03
00.04
<0.050
WES TV IF W WATER AUTHORITY
<0.050?
<0.999
<0.003
0031.
0.030
0.070
<0.010
000.2
00.00
00. 15
<0.050
WILKES BARRtI PA. GAS AN0 WATER COMPANY)
<0.010
<0.500
<0.003
0012.
<0.010
0.380
<000.1
00.00
00.35*
<0.050
WI LL I AM SPORT MUNICIPAL WATER AUT
<0.005
<0.500
<0.006
0015.
<0.010
0. 150
<0. 0207
000.8
00.00
00.04
<0.050
MAXIMUM
0.050
0.999
0.006
0078.
0.030
0.770
0.020
001.1
00.25
00.51
0.050
MINIMUM
0.005
0.005
0.000
0004.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.02
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MO.FAILING ?
8
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
22
31
31
30
31
31
24
31
26
31
31
STATE TOTAL 31
VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA
-------
RUN DATc 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOB
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
0.05*
0.002$
45 . *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
0.040
<0.0057
000.5
<0.010
mo.
0.010
<0.0057
003. L
0004.
0.030
<0.005?
000. I
0002.
0.130*
<0.001
<0.005?
005.0
0005.
0.120*
<0.005?
000.2
0059.
<0.070?
<0.005?
000. 1
0004.
0.020
0.000
002.0
0.100
<0.005
<0.010
0025.
0. 360
0.005
007.2
0. LOO
0.005
0.010
0130.
0.001
0.000
000. 1
0. 100
0.005
0.000
0000.
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
1
19
0
0
0
0
0
31
26
30
2
2
3
24
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
250.*
5.*
500.*
PENNSYLVANIA
0046.
0.010
027.0
0080.
06.80
0216.
4266080151000
0018.
0.060
049.0
0084.
07.50
0188.
4269280150000
0006.
0.120
013.0
0035.
06.30
0022.
4275400150000
0108.
0.260
096.0
07.40
0528.*
4276360150000
0009.
0.050
095.0
0085.
07.70
0140.
4260130150000
0096,
0.040
089.0
0083.
07.60
0178.
4291660150000
0006.
0.100
007.0
0030.
06.10
0048.
4292600150000
0030.
0.015
022.0
0018.
07.30
0146.
4292760150000
0180.
0.480
191.0
0360.
09.60
1298.
MAXIMUM
OOOO.
0.000
007.0
0012.
06.10
0022.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
31
31
29
28
31
28
NO. ANALYZED
31
STATE TOTAL
VIRGINIA
0.010
0.002
001.7
<0.001
<0.010
0006.
0025.
0.010
02 9.0
0061.
0. 180*
<0.001
000. 1
<0.001
<0.010
0028.
0018.
0.030
036.0
0017.
0.010
0.000
001.4
0.000
0.000
0008.
0033.
0.020
055.0
0105.
<0.010
<0.001
002.4
<0.001
<0.010
0011.
0042.
0.300
067.0
0123.
0.030
<0.001
000.0
<0.001
<0.010
0003.
0016.
0.090
019.0
0043.
0.010
0.000
002.4
0004.
0024.
0.090
024.0
0053.
0.010
0.001
000.0
<0.001
0001.
0009.
0.001
033. 1
0070.
0.010
0.001
001.5
0004.
0017.
0.010
020.0
0036.
<0.010
0.000
000.7
<0.010
0015.
0042.
<0.010
043.0
0083.
0.010
0.000
000.0
<0.001
<0.010
0007.
0009.
0.020
000.5
0013.
<0.300?
0.000
000.4
<0.001
<0.010
0010.
0019.
0.040
000.0
0032.
0.010
0.000
000.0
<0.001
<0.010
0005.
0030.
0.080
043.0
(3090.
0.050
<0.001
000. 1
<0.001
<0.010
0009.
0029.
0.720
033.0
0093.
<0.010
<0.001
001.7
<0.001
<0.010
0006.
0026.
<0.010
029.0
0064.
0.050
0.000
000.7
0.010 0.001
0.010
0005.
0030.
0.280
019.0
0056.
0.010
0.000
000.4
<0.005
<0.010
0002.
0013.
0.010
036.0
0051.
<0.010
<0.001
000.5
<0.001
<0.001
0003.
0003.
0.008
012.0
0011.
<0.010
<0.001
001.7
<0.001
<0.001
0002.
0003.
0.003
124.0
0126.
0.010
0.000
002.r
0001.
0007.
0.260
125.0
0137.
0.020
<0.001
<000.1
<0.001
<0.010
0040.
0023.
0.230
070.0
0033.
06.70 0092. 5101140150000
07.00 0144. 5101140199900
07.60 0174. 5103070150000
08.10 0175. 5116860199700
07.50 0048. 5117160150000
07.40 0098. 5117590150000
08.40 0083. 5119380150000
08.00 0071. 5124160150000
07.30 0140. 5143680150000
07.30 0006. 5154060150000
06.90 0000. 5155320150000
07.50 0115. 5164260150000
07.60 0098. 5165220150000
07.40 0106. 5166660150000
07.70 0098. 5176500150000
07.80 0077. 5177160150000
06.60 0040. 5177160150001
07.70 0146. 5177160150002
08.10 0002. 5185560150000
07.40 0153. 5186820150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
LOCATION
VIRGINIA
ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
20
0.003
0.500
0.001
0024.
0.0 LO
0.430
0.001
001.1
00. 10
04.30
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.010
0.000
000.1
00.01
00.01
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
15
20
20
20
20
19
20
20
20
20
W=ST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON. V A. WATER CO.)
0.009
0.000
0006.
0.000
0.030
001.3
00. 10
0.000
GRAFTON
<0.005
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.040
000.9
00.00
0.000
HINTONIW. VA. WATER COMPANY)
<0.005
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.024
000.1
00.01
0.000
HUNTINGTON! WATER CORP.
<0.005
0.000
0025.
0.000
0. 090
000.8
00.00
POLNT PLEASANT
<0.005
0.000
0031.
0.000
0. 100
00.11
OGQ EN< UNI ON WILLIAMS PSD)
0.008
0.000
0013.
0.000
0.110
000.6
0.000
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS(GREENBRIER HOTEL 1
<0.005
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.050
000. 1
00.00
0.000
MAX I MUM
0.009
0.000
0.000
0031.
0.000
0.110
001 .3
00.11
0.000
MINIMUM
0.005
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.024
000. 1
00.00
0.000
NO. FA1LI.MG *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
7
2
6
7
7
7
0
6
0
6
5
STATE TOTAL 7
MAXIMUM
0.050
0.999
0.010
0078.
0.030
0. 770
0.260
001.3
00.80
04.80
0.050
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
*
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
8
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
60
56
68
71
70
69
54
70
60
71
6$
REGION TOTAL 77
NOTt: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE ORINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 03
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS 10 NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45, * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05* 250.* 5.* 500.*
VIRGINIA
0.300
0.002
002.4
0.010
0.005
0.010
0040.
0042.
0.720
125.0
0137.
08.40
0175.
MAXIMUM
0.010
0.000
000.0
0.010
0.000
0.000
0001.
0003.
0.001
000.0
0011.
06.60
0000.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
20
20
20
1
16
16
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
WEST VIRGINIA
0.010
001.0
0.200
0.000
0013.
0027.
0.030
017.0
0052.
07.90
0087.
5414580150000
0.000
008.0
0.000
0002.
0018.
0.090
010.0
0020.
06.80
0087.
5432880150000
0.000
005.0
0.000
0002.
0015.
0.030
050.0
0070.
07.40
0130.
5437740150000
0.006
013.0
0.000
0019.
0091.
0.030
043.0
0130.
07.20
0304.
5438940150000
0.390*
013.0
0.000
0015.
0080.
0.040
131.0
0109.
07.20
0435.
5464920150000
0.010
024.0
0.000
0011.
0030.
0.050
200.0
0242.
07.40
0435.
5482085150000
0.000
004.0
0001.
0.040
065.0
0064.
07.60
0130.
5486400150000
0.390
024.0
0.200
0.000
0019.
0091.
0.090
200.0
0242.
07.90
0435.
MAXIMUM
0.000
001.0
0.200
0.000
0002.
0001.
0.030
010.0
0020.
06.80
0087.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
7
0
7
1
0
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
NO. ANALYZED
7
STATE TOTAL
0.390
0.500
024.0
1.500
0.005
0.010
0195.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.010
0.000
0.000
0000.
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
20
0
0
0
0
0
70
57
71
7
29
42
62
0180.
0.720
200.0
0360.
09.60
1298.
MAXIMUM
0000.
0.000
000.0
0011 .
06.10
0000.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
3
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
71
70
62
61
73
68
77
NO. ANALYZED
REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE ORINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
R UN L) ATf; 34-01-75
ft ESULTS of CHEMICAL analyses for
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEA°
0.Ob $ 1.0$ O.Olt 250.* 0.05$ I.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
ALABAMA
31 KMINGH Art WATFS WORKS
CITY OF OOTHAN NAPIER FIELD DIV.
HUNTSVILlE WATER WORKStTtNNFSSEE RIVER)
HUNTSVILLE(DALLAS WELL)
HUNTSVILLE
-------
RUN i)ATt 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 4!>. * 0.7$ 0.014 0.05t 250.* 5.* 500.*
ALABAMA
<0.030
000.9
017.0
0032.
07.40
0107800150000
0124900150000
0.007
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0003.
0025.
0.023
08.00
0158.
0142400150000
0.006
0.000
00 7.0
<0.005
0.000
0002.
<0025.
0.010
07.70
0173.
0142400150001
0.000
0.001
007.0
<0.005
0.000
0002.
<0025.
0.018
07.70
0148.
0142400150002
000.0
0156000150000
0.019
000.0
0003.
0004.
050.0
0053.
07.00
0156300150000
0.030
00 U 2
0003.
0018.
047.0
0055.
07.30
0158400150000
0.009
0000.
0086.
044.0
0119.
09.20
0160850150000
0.000
0.002
002.0
<0.005
0003.
0025.
0.006
07.40
0054.
0166910150000
0174600150000
0.000
0011.
016.0
0026.
09.00
0049.
0182500150000
0.030
0.002
007.0
0.005
0.000
0003.
0086.
0.023
050.0
0119.
09.20
0173.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000. 0
0.005
0.000
0000.
0004.
0.006
016.0
0026.
07.00
0049.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING »
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
9
4
8
0
4
3
7
8
4
5
5
9
5
NO. ANALYZED
12
STATE TOTAL
FLORIDA
0.000
0.000
000.6
0100.
0010.
0.002
0080.
08.60
026 1.
1208400150000
0031.
0248.
1209750150000
000.0
0075.
0094.
0209.
1209750199800
0.000
0.000
<000.2
0.005
0186.
142.0
0172.
07.40
0441.
1217250150000
0.003
0036.
0.200
0142.
09.20
1220400150000
0.000
0066.
0000.
0.000
168.0
0186.
07.40
0293.
1221000150000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0055.
0.005
043.0
0085.
09.30
0212.
1230300150000
0.000
000.4
0.000
0.000
0000.
0.000
0395.
1230750150000
0.000
0.000
000.2
0042.
0120.
0.002
016. 0
0165.
07.80
0410.
1243800150000
0.000
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0040.
0030.
0.003
160.Q
0267.
07.90
0370.
1243800199700
0.000
000.0
0014.
0076.
150.0
0238.
07.60
0334.
1243800199800
0.000
000.7
0.000
0042.
0078.
160.0
0244.
08.00
0346.
1243800199810
0. 000
0.000
000.2
0.000
0066.
0057.
0.003
058.0
0154.
07.50
0352.
1257900150000
0.000
0.001
<001.o.
0.000
0028.
<0025.
0.140
07.70
0180.
1258490150000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0092.
0024.
0.002
044.0
0080.
07.90
0216.
1258510150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE ORINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN UATc
04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALVSfc'S FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
LOCATIUN
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIU
0. 054
1.0$
0.01$
FLORIDA
ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION
<0. 020?
<0.010
PALM BEACH INTERMATIONAL AIRPORT
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
PANAMA C I TY (t)AY COUNTY WATEP. SYSTEM)
0.000
<0.010
PANAMA CITY1 J NT EftNATIONAl PAPER C0.>
0.000
<0.010
PENSACOLA
<0.005
0.068
0.000
PORT ST. JOE
<0.005
<0.010
RIVEftVItWIHILLS8QRQUGH COUNTY UTILITIE)
<0.005
<0.010
RIVIERA BEACH
o.ooo
<0.010
ST. PETERSBURG
<0.005
<0.010
SANFORD
0.000
<0.010
TALLAHASSEE
<0.005
<0.001
CITY OF TAMPA WATER DEPT
<0.005
<0.0 LO
TAMPA(GARDINIEK , INC.J
0.000
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
Z INC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
10 NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01S
0.05$
250. *
5.*
500.*
FLORIOA
0.000
0.000
0020.
0.005
017.0
0115.
07.50
0193.
1269150150000
0.000
0.003$
<001.0
0030.
<0025.
07.90
0289.
1271700150000
<0.010
0.000
0019.
0008.
0050.
07.30
0134.
1272600150000
0.000
000.6
0058.
0004.
0.004
120.0
0090.
07.30
02 59.
1272600199800
0.035
0.000
015.0
<0.005
0.000
0008.
<002 5.
0.580
06.60
0078.
12741001SOO00
0.010
0.000
001.3
0013.
0.006
056.0
0140.
07.00
0080.
1277400150000
0.000
0042.
0142.
174.0
0322.
07.50
0509.*
1279650150000
0.000
0.000
0034.
0006.
0.002
284.0
0080.
07.20
0397.
1279660150000
<0.010
0.000
000.0
094.0
0111.
08. 10
0144.
1282490150000
0.000
0.000
<000.2
0058.
0005.
0.000
015.0
0112.
07.80
0241.
1283550150000
<0.010
0.000
000.3
0.002
113.0
0116.
07.30
0150.
1288950150000
<0.010
0.000
001.9
0075.
020.0
0129.
07.60
0279.
1289250150000
0. 020
0.000
005.5
0143.
0074.
0.004
114.0
0196.
07.60
0292.
1289250199800
0.000
0.000
0186.
0008.
<0.002
150.0
0190.
07.60
0339.
1294650150000
<0.010
0.000
003.0
0033.
<0.006
0120.
07.40
0287.
1295550150000
0.035
0.003
015.0
0.005
0.005
0186.
0142.
0.580
284.0
0322.
09.30
0509.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0008.
0000.
0.000
015.0
0050.
06.60
0078.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
26
23
22
0
5
4
22
25
20
20
24
27
29
NO. ANALYZED
30 STATE TOTAL
GEORGIA
0.000
<0.001
000.0
0.000
0034.
0010.
0.120
040.0
0074.
07.70
0188.
<0.050
<0.001
000.3
<0.050
0008.
0004.
<0.050
0L6.0
0024.
08.00
0048.
0.000
<0.001
000.2
<0.050
0004.
0006.
<0.050
022.0
0025.
07.40
0560.*
0.000
<0.001
000.3
0005.
0010.
<0.050
024.0
0036.
07. 10
0074.
<0.050
0.000
000.5
<0.050
0006.
0008.
<0.050
026.0
0340.
08.40
0082.
<0.050
<0.001
000.0
<0.050
0007.
0.060
107.0
0097.
07.80
0170.
0.000
<0.001
000.0
<0.005,
0009.
0006.
<0.050
109*.0
0100;
07.80
0180.
<0.001
000.0
0015.
0005.
0.050
106.0
0090.
07.60
0160.
0.120*
<0.001
000.2
<0.050
0005.
0014.
<0.050
035.0
0440.
08.50
0094.
0.000
0.000
000.0
<0.002 0.000
0011.
0.076
07.80
0180.
0.000
0.000
000.0
<0.050
0010.
0007.
0.070
106.0
0096.
07.80
0170.
<0.050
0.000
000.0
<0.050
0009.
0007.
0.080
109.0
0098.
08.00
0170.
1301320150000
1304400150000
1304730150000
1304730199700
1319910150000
1354890150000
1378100150000
1378100199700
1378100199800
1378100199810
1378100199820
1378100199830
1378100199840
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANOARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING MATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OAT £ 04-U1-75
RESULTS GF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
A8S
IRON
LEAD
0.05$
1.0$
0.01$
25-0 . *
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
00.5#
00.3*
0.05$
GEORGIA
SAV AMAH I STANDARD
OIL )
<0.001
<0.020
<0.001
0003.
<0.050
<0.050
000.5
00.28
<0.010
SAVANNAH!AMERICAN
OIL CO.#
<0.001
<0.500
<0.001
000 7.
<0.050
<0.050
000.4
<00.10
<0.005
SAVANMAHISKIDAWAY
INST. fF JCEANOGRAPH)
THOMASVILLE
<0.001
0.000
<0.001
0009.
<0.050
<0.050
001.0
00.00
<0.010
MAXIMUM
0.005
0.500
O.OOl
0012.
0.050
0.050
001.0
00.05
00.28
0.032
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000.
0.000
0.000
000. 1
00.05
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N0.FAILIN3 ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
14
15
13
15
15
14
0
14
1
14
15
ST A T c TOTAL 17
KENTUCKY
ASHLAND WATES WOR.KS
<0.005
<0.020
0.000
0037.
0.017
0.013
<0.02 0?
001.5
<00.25
00.04
0.000
CATLtTTSElURG. KENOVA L CERcDO WA
<0.005
<0.030
0.000
0030.
0.012
0.010
<0.02 0?
000.1
<00.25
00.02
0.000
LAT ON IA{KENTON COUNTY WATtR
DISTRICT N1
<0.005
<0.030
0.000
0012.
0.012
0.013
<0.02 0?
000.8
<00.25
00.01
0.000
LEXINGTON(KENTUCKY AMERICAN
WATER COMP)
<0.999
<0.010
0060.
<0.050
<0.050
0.003
001.2
<0.050
LOUISVILLE WATER COMPANY
0.006
<0.999
<0.010
0052.
<0.050
<0.050
0.057*
001.1
<0.050
PADUCAH WATER WORKS
<0.999
<0.010
0018.
<0.050
<0.050
0.016*
001.1
<0.050
MAX I MUM
0.006
0.999
0.010
0060.
0.050
0.050
0.057
001.5
00.25
00.04
0.050
MINIMUM
0.005
0.020
0.000
0012.
0.012
0.010
0.003
000.1
00.25
00.01
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
3
3
6
STATE TOTAL 6
MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE I WATERWAYS MARINE)
GREENVILLE!INDUSTRIAL FILL)
GULFPOR T(OR ANGE GROVE UTILITIES)
PORT OF G'JLFPQRT
CITY OF JACKSON WATER DEPT PLANT
<0.005 0.046
0150.
<0.005 0.050 0.000 0015.
0.000
0.028 <0.004 000.3
0.010 <0.020? 001.2
<00.10 0.018
00.06 0.000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OAT E 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOA
INTERSTATE CARfc I6R WATER SUPPLIES
REG ION NO. 04
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500 .*
GEORGIA
<0.020
0.000
000.0
<0.005
3001.
0009.
<0.005
108. 0
0095.
08.00
0142.
1378100199850
<0.050
0.000
000. 0
<0.050
0010.
0007.
<0.050
107.0
0096.
08.00
0180.
1378100199 860
1378100199870
0.000
<3.001
000.0
0035.
0065.
<0.050
144.0
0051.
07.70
0182.
1387120150000
0.120
0.001
000.5
0.002
0.050
0035.
0065.
0.120
144.0
0440.
08.50
0560.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.002
0.000
0001.
0004.
0.005
016.0
0024.
07.10
0048.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
14
15
15
0
1
12
13
15
15
14
14
15
15
NO. ANALYZED
17 STATE TOTAL
KENTUCKY
0.000
<0.000
006.0
<0.005
0.000
0021.
0086.
0.100
060.0
0230.
07.50
0289.
2102640150000
0.008
<0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0031.
0118.
0. 160
082. 0
0200.
08.10
0333.
2113480150000
0.004
<0.001
00 2.0
<0.005
0.000
0009.
0034.
0. 120
110.0
0173.
07.90
0226.
2144560150000
000.9
<0.050
0050.
0040.
0.050
062.0
0142.
03.10
0230.
2146000150000
006.7
<0.050
0106.
0120.
0.050
046.0
0190.
07.80
0328.
214 7880150000
002.2
<0.050
0008.
0017.
0.050
060.0
0095.
07.80
0120.
2159040150000
0. 008
0.001
006.7
0.005
0.050
0106.
0120.
0. L60
110. 0
0230.
08. 10
0333.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.9
0.005
0.000
0008.
0017.
0.050
046.0
0095.
07.50
0120.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING.»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
3
3
6
0
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
NO. ANALYZED
6
STATE TOTAL
MISSISSIPPI
0.001 0.002 0.008 0222. 0003. 0.090 261.0 0017. 08.40 0524.* 2830940199800
2830940199900
2831460151000
2831460199800
0.008 0.002 001.0 <0.005 0.000 0004. <0025. 0.030 07.40 0096. 2837830150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 30
-------
RUN DATE 04-0 1-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
LOCATION
MISSISSIPPI
JACKSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
CITY OF MERIDIAN
PASCAGOULAIJACKSON
PASCAGOULA(JACKSON
PASCAGOULAIJACKSON
PASCAGQULA
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
O.OS*
250.*
5.*
500.*
MISSISSIPPI
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0083.
0032.
07.90
0302.
2837830199700
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0017.
<0025.
0.015
07.00
0094.
285 1090150000
000.2
1971.
2859410199800
2859410199810
000.2
1971.
2859410199820
0.068*
<0.062
<0.002
<0.006
<0.062
08.10
2859410199830
2659410199840
<0.013
<0.002
<0.002
<0.027
08.30
2859410199850
2859410199860
0.000
<0.001
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0016.
<0025.
0.010
07.90
0117.
2887100150000
0.068
0.002
002.0
0.062
0.005
0.008
0222.
0032.
0.090
261.0
1971.
08.40
0524.
MAXIMUM
0. 000
0.001
001.0
0.062
0.002
0.000
0004.
0003.
0.010
000.2
0017.
07.00
0094.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
7
4
4
1
7
7
5
5
6
3
3
7
5
NO. ANALYZED
15
STATE TOTAL
NORTH CAROLINA
0.000
0135.
0.000
310.0
0001.
08.20
3706240150000
<0.030
0.000
<0.001
0005.
0008.
<0.050
022.0
0024.
08.30
0057.
3713920150000
0.002
<0.001
0005.
0.025
018.0
0028.
08.90
0056.
3713920150001
0.010
<0.025?
0019.
0029.
0.150
019.0
0150.
07.30
0095.
3721920150000
<0.030
0011.
0.150
017.0
0017.
07.70
3726800150000
0.010
0004.
0006.
0.010
027.0
0043.
07. 80
0006.
3731920150000
3731920150001
0.030
0008.
0.100
067.0
0057.
07.10
3731920199900
<0.030
0013.
<0.050
006.0
0003.
07.10
3733440150000
0.000
0010.
0.180
300.0
0268.
08.00
3752240150000
0. 000
<0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0120.
<0025.
0.000
241.0
0007.
08.70
0315.
3754800150000
<0.030
0032.
0.080
031 «0
0054*.
08.30
3763520150000
<0.030
0005.
<0.050
024.0
0030.
07.70
3763520150001
0. 000
0024.
0.130
034.0
0022.
07.90
3766100150000
<0.030
0011.
0.220
027.0
0017.
07.00
3768080150000
0.045
002.0
0.000
0.000
0021.
0.080
0l9i0
0023.
08.00
0082.
3786400150000
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0039.
<0025.
0.080
094.0
0096.
08. 10
0617.*
3786400199800
0.030
0.002
000.2
0004.
0015.
0.150
017.0
0032.
07.50
0070.
3787120150000
NOTES * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDAROS LIMIT
-------
SUN DATE 34-01-75
RESULTS CF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
LOCATION
NORTH CAROLINA
wINSTUN-SALEM(NEl LSON PLANT)
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING «
NO. FAILING $
¦NO. FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZE1)
STATc TOTAL 19
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05* 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01* 250.* 0.05$ 1.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
OmZt 00.5*
IRON
00.3*
0. 010
0.400
0.010
0058.
0.050
0.070
0.020
001.3
00.25
00.62
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.000
0.020
000. 1
00.00
00.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
17
4
17
17
17
17
2
17
4
17
LEAD
0.05$
0.050
0.000
0
0
0
17
SOUTH CAROLINA
bEAUFOPT(JAS'ER WATER AUTHORITY)
CAYCE
CHARLESTON COMMISSIONERS OF PUBL
COLUMBIA
FLORENCE
CITY OF GEORGETOWN
GREfcMV1 LIE WATER WORKS
GREER
MOUNT PL E AS AN T(06TYENS SHIPYARDS, INC.)
SPARTANBURG
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FARING 4
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZES
STATE TOTAL 10
<0.030?
0009.
0.050
0
<0.005
0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.
<0.010
0008.
<0.050
<0
<0.005
0.060
0.000
0010.
0.011
0
<0.010
0006.
<0.010
<0
<0.030?
0014.
<0.050
<0.
<0.030?
0009.
<0.050
<0
<0.030?
0005.
<0.050
<0,
<0,
<0.030?
0005.
0.000
0,
0.005
0.060
0.030
0014.
0.050
0.
0.005
0.050
0.000
0005.
0.000
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
2
2
9
9
9
100
000.1
00.10
0.050
000
<0.020?
<000.1
<00.25
00.04
0.000
010
<0.100?
<00.10
<0.050
020
<0.02 0?
001.0
<00.25
00.03
0.000
100
<00.10
<0.050
100
<0.100?
<000.1
<00.30
<00.10
<0.050
100
00.10
<0.050
100
000.9
00.20
<0.050
100
00.10
000
000.8
00.00
00.01
0.000
10 0
0.100
001.0
00.30
00.20
0.050
000
0.020
000. 1
00.00
00.01
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
10
4
6
4
10
9
TENNESSEE
ALCOA
CHATTANOOGA(TENNESSEE AMERICAN WATER C>
CLARKSVILLE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
JOHNSON CITY!WATAUGA PLANT)
<0.005
<0.001
0.001
<0.005
<0.050
<0.040
0.008
<0.050
0.000
<0.005
0.002
0.000
<0010.
0014.
000 7.
<0010.
0.000
<0.006
0.003
0.000
0.000
<0.010
0.004
0.000
<0 . 02 0?
<0.005
0.001
<0.02 0?
001.1 <00.25 00.02 0.000
001.0 00.03 <00.01 <0.040
001.0 00.01 00.11 0.001
001.1 <00.25 00.02 0.000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
MATER STANDARDS RECQMMENOEO LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANOATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM OETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 33
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-7 5
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.002$
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL
HARDNESS PH
TOS
500.*
0.045
0.D25
002.0
0.005
0.001
0135.
0029.
0.220
310.0
0268.
08.90
0617.
0.000
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.000
0004.
0005.
0.000
006.0
0001.
07.00
0006.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
6
4
0
3
4
16
7
17
17
17
17
8
19
ID NO.
NORTH CAROLINA
370 7120150001
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
SOUTH CAROLINA
0.050
<0.001
0012.
0000.
0.050
021.0
0018.
07.10
0062.
4505200150000
0.007
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0008.
<0025.
0.180
07.20
0049.
4513800150000
<0.050
<0.500?
0011.
<0.100
017.0
0010.
06.60
0142.
4514800150000
0.004
<0.001
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0005.
<0025.
0.058
07.50
0079.
4518000150000
<0.050
<0.001
0009.
<0.100
025.0
0009.
07.40
0064.
4529400150000
<0.050
<0.500?
000.3
0010.
<0. 100
010.0
0016.
06.50
0066.
4533200150000
<0.050
0.000
0007.
0.200
019.0
0005.
08.40
0036.
4536200150000
<0.050
<0.001
0009.
<0.100
021.0
0006.
07.20
4536600150000
<0.500?
0067.
0.200
0016.
4560600150000
0.000
0.000
000.2
0005.
0.050
015.0
0020.
07.10
0050.
4583210150000
0. 050
0.500
002.0
0.005
0.000
0067.
0025.
0.200
025.0
0020.
08.40
0142.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.2
0.005
0.000
0005.
0000.
0.050
010.0
0005.
06.50
0036.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
9
9
4
0
2
2
9
4
10
7
8
9
8
NO. ANALYZED
10 STATE TOTAL
TENNESSEE
0.015
<0.005
0.001
0.010
<0.000
<0.002
0.001
<0.000
002.0
003.0
000.2-
003.0
<0.003
0.001
<0.005
0.000
<0.005
0.001
0.000
0003.
0005.
0037.
<0025.
0011.
0034.
<0025.
o.ooe
<0.010
0.010
0.076
044.0
051.0
066.0
055.0
0046.
0Q70.
0085.
0096.
08.00
07.80
07.00
08.10
0088.
0702.*
0114.
0106.
4700840150000
4715600150000
4716920150000
4744760150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE ORINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 34
-------
RUN DATE 34-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
interstate carrier water supplies
REGION NO. 04
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
ABS
IRON
LEAD
0.03$
l.0»
0.01$
250.*
0.05$
l.»
0.2$
00.5*
00. 3*
0.05$
TENNESSEE
JGH.MiON CITYJUNICQ1
PLANT 1
<0.005
0.055
0.000
<0010.
0.005
<0.020?
000.6
<00.25
00.01
0.000
K. NO XVILLE UTILITIES
BPA^D
0.000
0.010
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.053
0.010
001.0
00.03
00.03
0.000
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS £
WATE? OIV.
<0.010
<0.500
<0.001
0005.
<0.005
0.034
<0.010
OOL.O
00.05
<0.010
NASHVILLE
0.010
0.100
0.004
0006.
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.01
0.000
SMYRNA PUBLIC WATER
SUPPLY
<0.002
0.070
0.002
0009.
<0.010
0.029
<0.003
001.0
00.02
00.02
0.010
MAXIMUM
0. 010
0.500
0.005
0014.
0.010
0.053
0.020
001.1
00.25
00.11
0.040
MINIMUM
0.000
0.008
0.000
0005.
0.000
0.000
O.OOl
000.6
03.01
00.01
0.000
NO. FAILING »
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYSED
9
9
9
9
8
9
s
9
7
9
9
STATE TOTAL 9
MAXIMUM
0.020
0.999
0.030
0150.
0.050
0. 120
0. 100
001.5
00.30
00.62
0.050
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00. 00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
2
0
5
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYiEO
65
52
89
98
89
92
50
95
29
92
92
REGION TOTAL 118
r-iCT £: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
» INDICATES VALUE FAILING TnE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OATE OA—01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 04
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0 .002J
• 45. *
0. 7$
O.Oli
0.05i
250.*
5.*
500.*
TENNESSEE
0.000
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0003.
<0025.
0.020
08.00
0078.
4744760150001
0.000
<0.001
001.2
0.000
0.000
0014.
0025.
0.079
069. 0
0084.
07.50
0137.
4746320150000
<0.010
<0.002
ooo. 4
<0.002
0.003
00 08.
0003.
0.050
056.0
0049.
07.20
0085.
4756640150000
0.000
0.153
0.003
0.000
0007.
0029.
0.038
068.0
0109.
08.02
0130.
4761440150000
<0.003
0.001
000.3
<0.001
00L6.
0.007
140.0
0180.
07.40
0355.
4779800150000
0.015
0.002
003.0
0.153
0.005
0.005
0037.
0034.
0.079
140.0
0180.
08.10
0702.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.2
0. 153
0.000
0.000
0003.
0003.
0.007
044. 0
0046.
07.00
0078.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING S
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
9
a
8
1
7
9
7
9
9
8
8
9
9
NO. ANALYZED
9
STATE TOTAL
0. 120
0.500
015.0
0.153
0.005
0.050
0222.
0142.
0.580
310.0
1971.
09.30
0702.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.062
0.000
0.000
0000.
0000.
0.000
000.2
0001.
06.50
0006.
MINIMUM
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
NO. FAILING *
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING S
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
94
72
71
2
32
47
85
79
87
80
85
99
85
NO. ANALYZED
118 REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 36
-------
RUN DATE 1)4-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ I.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
ILLINOIS
BEDFORD PARK
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0013.
0.000
0. 150
<0.050?
001.0
00.06
00.06
0.043
CAIRO
0.005
0.020
0.000
0015.
0.000
0.007
<0.02 0?
000.7
00.01
0.000
CARBUNDAL?
0.030
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.000
OOL.O
00.00
0.000
N. ILL. W4TFP CORP.-CHAMPAIGN
0.000
0.100
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.010
0.000
001.2
00.00
0.000
CHICA GO
0.000
0.000
0.0 00
0010.
0.000
0.006
o.ooo
OOUO
00.00
00.01
0,000
GALESfSURG PU3LIC WATER SUPPLY
0.0 30
0.000
0.000
0006.
0.000
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.02
0.000
HARRISBURG
0.000
0.000
0.000
0022.
0.000
0.000
001.4
00.00
0.000
HART FOR L) t HA.X FOR 0 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLYI
0.000
0.000
0.000
0025.
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
000.6
00.00
0.000
JOLIET MUNICIPAL
0.000
0.000
0035.
0.000
0.000
000.8
00.05
0.000
LEMONT MUNICIPAL
0.000
0.100
0.000
0023.
0.000
0.000
0.000
001.3
00.06
00.20
0.000
LEMONTtUN I ON OIL COMPANY 1
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
00 4 7.
0.000
0.011
001.5
<00.05
00.07
0.000
MOL[ME(QUAD CITY AIRPORT)
0.005
0.160
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.250
0.02 0*
000.7
<00.25
00.08
0.000
PcORIA(AMERICAN WATEP WORKS SERVICE CO)
0.700
0.0 00
0023.
0.000
0.050
001.2
00.03
0.000
ROCKFORD
ROCK ISLAND WATER DEPARTMENT
0. 005
0.050
0.000
0023.
0.000
0.000
0.020*
000.5
<00.25
00.01
0.000
RQSEMUNT
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0012.
0.000
0.003
<0.020?
OOO.l
<00.25
00.02
0.000
SCHILLER PARK
<0.005
<0.050
o.ooo
0012.
0.000
0.013
<0.020?
000. 1
<00.25
00.03
0.000
SPRIN GF I EL D
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
0025.
0.000
0.000
001.4
00.00
0.000
WOOD RIVER
0.000
0.000
0.000
0025.
0.000
0.000
001.2
00.06
0.000
MAXIMUM
0.005
0. 700
0.000
0047.
0.000
0.250
0.050
001.5
00.25
00.20
0.043
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
0006.
0.000
0.000
0.000
OOO.l
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
AIO, FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
16
16
IS
18
18
La
11
18
9
18
18
STATE TOTAL 19
INDIANA
EAST CHICAGO
0.010
0.010
0012.
0.010
0.020
000.8
00.10
00.10
0.020
EVANSVILLE
<0.010
<0.010
0024.
<0.010
<0.020
001.1
<00.10
<00.10
<0.020
GARY—H09ART WATER CO.
INDIANAPOLIS WATER CO.(WHITE RIVER PLA)
<0.010
<0.010
0033.
<0.010
<0.20
001.0
<00.10
<00.10
<0.020
INDIANAPOLIS WATER CO.1 FALL CREEK PLAN)
<0.010
<0.010
0028.
<0.010
<0.020
001.1
<00.10
<00.10
<0.020
LUGANSPORT
<0.010
<0.010
0020.
<0.010
0. 170
000.8
<00.10
00.20
<0.020
MICHIGAN CITY
<0.010
<0.010
0009.
<0.020
000.1
<00.10
<00.20
<0.020
MIDOLEBURY
<0.010
<0.010
0008.
<0.010
<0.020
000.3
<00.10
01.20*
<0.020
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN HATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER MATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7S 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
ILLINOIS
0.011
0 .000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0.000
005.0
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
001.3
o.ooo
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OOl
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.4
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.100*
0.000
000.8
0.000
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.005
<0.001
<001.0
<0.002
0.034
0.001
012.0
<0.005
0.020
0.000
000.4
0.000
0.003
0.000
003.0
0.500
0.005
0.004
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.00 7
0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0.000
002.2
0.000
0.030
0.000
000.0
0.000
0. 100
0.001
012.0
0.500
0.005
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.500
0.000
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
18
17
1
16
0.000
0006.
0025.
0.120
0.000
0009.
0057.
0.000
0.000
0019.
007 3 •
0.000
054.0
0.000
0031.
0021.
0.000
100.0
0004.
0029.
0.007
105.0
0.000
0005.
0014.
0.010
208.0
0.000
0035.
0166.
0.000
064.0
0.000
0017.
0055.
0.000
100.0
0060.
0190.
0.000
283.0
0.000
0053.
0075.
0.000
284.0
0.000
,0119.
0123.
0.076
260.0
0.000
0087.
002 5.
0.083
0.000
0037.
0050.
0.020
384.0
0.000
0006.
006 8.
0.014
0.000
0005.
0029.
0.013
0.000
0005.
<0025.
0.017
0.000
0011.
0064.
0.000
040.0
0.000
0016.
0070.
0.000
002.0
0.000
0119.
0190.
0. 120
3 84.0
0.000
0004.
0014.
0.000
002.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
18
18
12
07.70
0164.
1705780150000
08. 10
0245.
1711640150000
0112.
07.30
0200.
1712720150000
0084.
09.00
0180.
1714280150000
0129.
07.91
0190.
1715430150000
0230.
07.30
0248.
1729520150000
0206.
08.00
0310.
1734320150000
0140.
08.00
0240.
1734440150000
0408.
07.80
0610.*
1739660150000
0247.
07.50
0420.
1744100150000
08.10
0546.*
1744100199800
07.60
0447.
1752260150000
0374.
08.30
0435.
176 1800150000
1767740150000
07.80
0298.
176 7860150000
08.00
0172.
1768560150 000
07.80
0170.
1770740150000
0108.
09.40
0196.
1774160150000
0022.
03.80
0180.
1786040150000
0408.
09.40
0610.
MAXIMUM
0022.
07.30
0164.
MINIMUM
0
0
2
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
11
18
18
NO. ANALYZEO
19
STATE TOTAL
0.020
<0.020
0.030
0.020
0.040
<0.020
<0.080?
0.000
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
001 .8
007.6
023.9
015. 1
022.0
001.3
000. 5
<0.020
0006.
0032.
0.020
094.0
0131
0012.
0080.
<0.020
082.0
0170
0012.
0072.
<0.020
182.0'
0300
0012.
0064.
0.020
192.0
0288
0009.
0095.
0.200
202.0
0330
0005.
0020.
106.0
0133
0009.
0002.
0.020
260.0
0248
I NOI ANA
07.40 0180. 1824090150000
08.10 0270. 1826510150000
1831680150000
07.30 0410. 1840370150000
07.30 0380. 1840370150001
07.00 0480. 1B49280150000
07.30 1853900150000
07.10 0280. 1854120150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DfcINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE OR INKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
LOCATION
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05t 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE A8S
0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00. 3»
LEAD
0.05$
INDIANA
MGIMT -VERNON
SOUTH SEND PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
<0.010
<0.010
<0. 010
<0.0 10
0024.
00 16.
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020
<0.020
000.8
000.8
<00.01
<00.10
00.10
00. 10
<0.020
<0.020
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.010
0.010
0
0
0
9
010
010
0
0
0
9
0033.
0008.
0
0
0
9
0.010
0.010
0
0
0
8
0.200
0.020
0
0
0
9
001.1
000. 1
0
0
0
9
00.10
00.01
0
0
0
9
01.20
00.10
1
0
0
9
0.020
0.020
0
0
0
9
10
MICHIGAN
DETROIT METRO WATER DEPARTMENT
0009.
001.0
00.02
ELBERTA
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0013.
0.000
0.014
000.2
00.20
0.025
GRAND RAPIDS
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0011.
0.000
0.005
<0.020?
001. 1
<00.25
00.00
0. 000
IRON MOUNTAIN
0017.
000.4
<00.05
<00.05
KALAMAZOO
0033.
001.0
00.08
LUDINGTON
<0.005
<0.050
<0.001
0012.
0.000
0.017
001.3
00.09
0.000
MARINE CITYIEAST CHINA TOWNSHIP)
0.010
0.015
0. OOT
0012.
0.003
0.005
0.005
001.2
00.03
00.01
0.023
MUSKEGON
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0015.
0.000
0.005
<0.020?
000.9
<00.25
00.00
0.000
PAI.NESDALEI ADAMS TWP. S. PANGE W £ S A>
0005.
000.0
00.12
PORT HURON
<0.060?
0.013
<0.006
0010.
<0.006
000.0
00.05
0.040
SAGINAW
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.004
<0.020?
001.1
<00.25
00.00
0. 000
ST. JOSEPH
0010.
001.0
00.00
SAULT STE. MARIE
<0.005
0.010
<0.005
0002.
<0.005
0.004
0.004
001.3
<00.25
<00.05
0.000
TRAVERSE CITY
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.017
<0.020?
001.0
00.05
0.000
WYOMING
<0.005
<0.050
0. 000
0011.
0.000
0.050
<0.020?
001.0
<00.25
OQ.OO
0.000
YPSILANTI TOWNSHIP
0050.
001.L
00.05
MAX I MUM
0.060
0.050
0.007
0050.
0.006
0.050
0.020
001.3
00.25
00.20
0.040
MINIMUM
0.005
0.010
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.004
0.004
000.0
00.03
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING «
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FA I LING ?
I
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
10
10
10
16
10
9
7
16
7
16
10
STATE TOTAL 16
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 39
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-T5
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
MANGANESE
0.05*
<0.020
0.020
0.080
0.020
0
0
1
9
MERCURY
0.002$
<0.001
<0.000
0,001
0.000
0
0
0
7
NITRATE
45. *
007.6
<000.5
023.9
000.5
0
0
0
9
CCE
0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
<0.020
0.020
0.020
0
0
0
2
SODIUM
0010.
0007.
0012.
0005.
0
0
0
9
SULFATE
250.*
0085.
0041.
0095.
0002.
0
0
0
9
ZINC
5.*
0.450
<0.020
0.450
0.020
0
0
0
8
ALKAL HARDNESS PH
IDS
500.*
078.0
224.0
260.0
078.0
0
0
0
9
0166.
0274.
0330.
0131.
0
0
0
9
07.60
07.30
08.10
07.00
0
0
0
9
10 NO.
INDIANA
0280. 1858850150000
0280. 1881950150000
0480. MAXIMUM
0180. MINIMUM
0 NO. FAILING *
0 NO. FAILING $
0 NO.FAILING ?
8 NO. ANALYZED
10 STATE TOTAL
0.000
000.3
0.000
0.000
000.1
0.000
<0.001
001.8
<0.010
000.1
>0.200*
0.000
009.0
0.010
0.000
001.4
0.003
0.000
0.000
001.4
<0.010
001.. 1
0.010
000.3
0.000
0.000
000.3
0.000
0.000
000.9
0.000
0.000
001.0
0.010
0.000
001.0
0.000
<0.001
002.2
0.020
000.8
0.200
0.001
009.0
0.000
0.000
000.1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
11
15
0.007 0.004
0.200 <0.005 0.000
0.051 0.003 0.004
0.002 0.001
0.300 0.015$ 0.000
<0.001
0.200 <0.005 0.000
0.037 <0.005 0.000
0.300 <0.005 0.000
0.200 <0.005 0.000
0.300 0.015 0.004
0.037 0.001 0.000
0 0 0
0 1 o
0 0 0
7 10 9
0004.
0020.
0013.
0080.
0.002
0008.
0032.
0.035
0007.
0015.
0013.
0042.
0006.
0042.
0.012
0007.
0019.
0.070
0008.
0030.
0.043
0001.
0006.
0004.
0016.
<0.013
0004.
0023.
0.058
0007.
0027.
0001.
0002.
0.010
0004.
0022.
0.041
0009.
0032.
0.043
0028.
' 0079.
0028.
0080.
0.070
0001.
0002.
0.002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
10
075.0
0099.
07.60
220.0
0300.
08.10
111.0
0142.
08.16
080.0
0105.
09.00
250.0
0310.
07.30
101.0
0145.
07.90
086.0
0100.
07.60
096.0
0150.
08.00
085.0
1000.
07.60
075.0
0100.
07.90
049 .0
0078.
09.80
100.0
0140.
07.50
040.0
0045.
07.10
100.0
0130.
07.70
104.0
0132.
07.60
026.0
0125.
09.50
250.0
1000.
09.80
026.0
0045.
07.10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
16
MICHIGAN
0133.
2624900150000
0383.
2628700150000
0204.
2639200150000
0123.
264 7200150000
0300.
2649100150000
0191.
2655300150000
0128.
2658000150000
0212.
2665300150000
0124.
2672700150000
2676800150000
0114.
2682700150000
0171.
2683500150000
0058.
2684800150000
0150.
2693200150000
0193.
2699680150000
2699760150000
0383.
MAXIMUM
0058.
MINIMUM
0
NO. FAILING *
0
NO. FAILING «
0
NO.FAILING 7
14
NO. ANALYZEO
16
STATE TOTAL
NOTE! * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE ORINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE ORINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECT ABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATc 04-1) L-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.35$ l.Ot 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05t
MINNESOTA
FAR IBAUlT
MANK4T0
MARSHALL MUNICIPAL
MINNcAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS ST. PAUL(MW ORIENT A.)
RfcD wING
ST. PAUL
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAIL IMG *
NO. FAILING $
NU.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 7
0002.
000.4
00.il*
0025.
001.2
00. 10
00.05
0039.
000.4
<00.10
00.21
0010.
001.0
00.00
00.04
ooor.
000.3
00.60*
0.005
0.050
0.000
0184.
0.000
0.049
0.020*
001.1
00.25
00.48*
0014.
001. 1
00.00
00.01
0.005
0.050
0. OOO
0184.
0.000
0.049
0.020
001.2
00.25
00.60
0.005
0.050
o.ooo
0002.
0.000
0.049
0.02 0
000.3
00.00
00.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
7
5
7
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1.
OHIO
AKRON-CANTON REG. AIRPORT
<0.005
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
000.3
00.05
00.42*
ASHTAiJUlA
0.000
0.000
00 3 7.
0.000
0.000
001. 1
00.00
canton
0.000
0.000
0.000
0040.
0.000
0.000
000.1
00.05
oo.oa
CINC INNAT I
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.2
00.00
00.00
CLEVELAND WATER SUPPLY
<0.005
0.050
0.000
00 2 3.
0.000
0.004
<0. 002
001.2
<00.25
00.19
CITY Of COLUMBUS(DUBLIN RD)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0029.
0.000
0.000
001.2
00, 09
00.00
CITY OF C.1LUM bUS ( MORSE R0AD1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0029.
0.000
0.000
001.2
00.09
00.00
CONN?AUT
0.000
0.000
0028.
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.00
OAYTON
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.2
00.00
FAIRPORT HARBOR
0.000
0.000
0028.
0.000
0.050
o.ooo
000.5
00.06
00.00
HURON WATER FILTRATION PLANT
0.000
0.000
0.000
0025.
0.000
0.000
000.7
00.00
00.00
LORAIN
0.000
0.000
0023.
0.000
0.000
000.2
00.00
MARIETTA
0.000
0.000
0060.
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.00
SANDUSKY wATER WORKS
0.000
0.000
0.000
0022.
0.000
0.000
001.2
00.00
00.06
TOLEDO COLLINS PARK WATER TREATM
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.000
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.00
CITY OF VANQALIA
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.000
000.4
00.07
00.35*
VIENNA!YJUNGSTOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT)
0.000
0.000
0230.
0.000
0.070
000.2
00.05
00.20
WFLLSVILLE WATER SUPPLY
0.000
0.000
0012.
0.000
0.000
000.2
00.05
00.00
YOUNGSTUWN(MAHONING VALLEY SANITARY 01)
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.000
000.9
00.05
00.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
6.000
NOTE! * INOICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE OR INKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT.
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS 10 NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7* 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
MINNESOTA
0. 050
0.020
0.100*
o.oio
0.334
0.010
0. 100
3.010
1
0
0
6
<0.001
001
001
0
0
0
1
020. 0
<000.I
001.0
001.0
000.8
020.0
000,
0.100 0.005
0.100
0. 100
0
0
0
1
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
6.
0025.
0120.
0009.
0110.
0008.
0120.
0006.
0
0
0
6
0012.
0110.
0700.*
0032.
0007.
0029.
0007.
0700.
0007.
1
0
0
7
0.044
0.030
0.044
0.030
0
0
0
2
250.0
048.0
340.0
045.0
250.0
340.0
04 5.0
0
0
0
6
0210.
0180.
0500.
0077.
0250.
060.0 0084.
0500.
0077.
0
0
0
6
07. 10
09.30
07.40
07.80
07.50
08.20
08.50
09.30
07.10
0
0
0
7
0230. 2731200150000
0290. 2760000150000
2761200150000
0133. 2763600150000
0270. 2763610150000
2778400150000
0130. 2783600150000
0290. MAXIMUM
0130. MINIMUM
0 NO. FAILING *
0 NO. FAILING S
0 NO.FAILING 7
5 NO. ANALYZED
7 STATE TOTAL
OHIO
0.180#
<0.001
000.4
<0.005
0.000
0012.
0026.
0.000
290.0
0306.
08.00
0370.
3900850150000
0.000
000.3
0.000
0019.
0032.
0.000
087.0
0144.
07.50
0209.
3903080150000
0.000
000.9
0.000
0015.
0120.
0.000
200.0
0310.
07.70
0430.
3913230150000
0.000
005.0
0.000
0010.
0089.
0.000
068.0
0150.
08.10
0216.
3916030150000
0.003
<0.001
003.0
0.600 <0.005
0.000
0032.
0.110
07.80
0180.
391666 0150 000
0.000
0.000
011.4
0.000
0.000
0026.
0082.
0.000
032.0
0119.
08.50
0151.
3917920150000
0.000
0.000
011.4
0.000
0.000
0026.
0082.
0.000
032.0
0119.
08.50
0151.
3917920150.001
0.000
000.2
0.000
oo la.
0038.
075.0
0138.
07.40
0158.
3918340150000
0.000
002.4
0.000
0027.
0085.
0.000
045.0
0124.
07.0 0
0217.
3920930150000
0. 000
0.000
001.3
0.000
0013.
0018.
0.000
092.0
0136.
07.70
0230.
3926330150000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0014.
0030.
0.000
087.0
0132.
07.40
0212.
393 7660150000
0.000
001 .2
0.000
0010.
0045.
090.0
0148.
07.70
0185.
3945920150000
0.000
005.7
0.000
0031.
0104.
0.000
015.0
0132.
06.40
0244.
3949070150000
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0021.
0039.
o.ooo
097.0
0124.
07.50
0184.
3974130150000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0011.
0017.
0.000
033.0
0052.
09. 10
0094.
3982600150000
0.000
0.000
007.2
0.000
0017.
0060.
0.000
291.0
0348.
07.60
0442.
3984630150000
0.000
0.000
0088.
0152.
195.0
0071.
07.80
3985330199700
0.060*
002.2
0.000
0009.
0108.
0.000
031.0
0124.
07.90
0198.
3987710150000
0.000
000. V
0.000
0038.
0105.
0.000
040.0
0112.
09.60
0222.
3992190150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENOEO LIMIT
WATER STANDAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 42
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WfcTEP SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ O.OU 2 50.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
OHIO
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING «
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
19
0.005
0.050
0.000
0230.
0.000
0.070
0.02 0
001 .2
00.25
00.42
0.000
0.000
0.000
000 7.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.1
00.00
00.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
18
19
18
19
19
4
19
15
19
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
19
WISCONSIN
EAU CLAIPE
GREEN BAY
GREEN BAYIAUSTIN STPAUB EL AIRPORT)
LACROSSE
MAO I SON
MANITOHOC
MILWAUKEE
OSHKOSH
SHEBOYGAN
STURGEON BAY
SUPER10R
WAUKESHA
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL U
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.036
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.05 7
<0.005
0.060
0.000
0013.
0.000
0.057
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.009
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
<0.500
<0.010
0014.
0.030
<0.020
<0.005
<0.050
0. 000
0016.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
<0. 100
<0.005
0.018
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0011.
0.000
0.024
<0.020?
<0.500
<0.010
0014.
<0.030
0.070
<0.005
<0.050
0.002
<0010.
0.000
0.010
<0.005
0.06 8
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.000
0.020
0.500
0.010
0016.
0.030
0.070
0.005
0.050
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
12
11
11
12
<0.020?
<000. 1
00.25
00.01
0.000
0.020*
001.0
<00.25
00.02
0.000
<0.02 C7
001.8
<00.25
00.05
0.000
<0.020?
<000.1
<00.25
00.05
0. 000
<0.020?
001.0
<00.25
00.03
9.000
000.9
<00.10
00.32
<0. 050
<0.020?
001.0
<00.25
00.02
0.000
<0.020
<0.02 0?
001.1
<00.25
00.03
0.000
001.2
<00.10
00.20
<0.040
<0.050?
<000.1
<00.05
00.50*
<0.020
<0.020?
000.8
<00.25
00.3T*
0.024
0.050
001.8
00.25
00.50
0.050
0.020
000.1
00.05
00.01
0.000
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
11
11
11
12
NOTE*- * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ O.OU 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
OHIO
0.180
0.001
011.4
0.600
0.005
0.000
0088.
0152.
0. 110
291.0
0348.
09.60
0442.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.600
0.000
0.000
0009.
0017.
0.000
015.0
0052.
06.40
0094.
MINIMUM
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
19
a
IB
1
6
19
18
19
16
18
18
19
18
NO. ANALYZED
19 STATE TOTAL
WISCONSIN
0.003
<0.001
007.0
0.400
<0.005
0.000
0003.
<0025.
0.021
07.70
0110.
5524900150000
0.001
<0.001
001.0
0.200
<0.005
0.000
0004.
<002 5.
0. 100
07.20
0166.
5534000150000
0.010
<0.001
<000.1
<0.005
0013.
0039.
0.033
08.00
0286.
5534000199700
0.028
<0.001
006.0
0.200
<0.005
0.000
0006.
0036.
0.054
07.80
0376.
5544400150000
0.026
-------
»UN IjATE 04-0 1-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0* 0.01* 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING i
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
KEG I UN THTAL
83
0.060
0.700
0.010
0230.
0.030
0.250
0.050
001.8
00.25
01.20
0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
56
59
69
79
67
68
32
80
56
80
69
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS'HIGHER
PAGE 45
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 05
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.0021
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.»
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL
HARDNESS PH
TGS
500. *
ID NO.
0.400
0.001
023.9
0.600
0.015
0.040
0120.
0700.
0.450
384.0
2088.
09.80
1888.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.037
0.000
0.000
0001.
0002.
0.000
002.0
0022.
06.40
0058.
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
78
57
75
16
43
58
77
80
66
63
62
SO
74
83
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALY2E0
REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 46
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00^5* 00.3* 0.05$
ARKANSAS
FAY ETTEV ILL E
<0.010
<0.005
0005.
<0.010
<0.050
FORT SMITH
<0.010
0003.
0.000
0.000
HELENA
<0.010
<0.003
0074.
<0.003
<0.050
HOT SPRINGS(MOUNTA IN VALLEY WATER CO.J
<0.010
<0.005
0003.
<0.010
<0.050
JONtSBORD WATER AND LIGHT COMPAN
0.000
<0.001
0011.
<0.003
0. 540
LITTLE ROCK MUNICIPAL WATER WORK
<0.010
<0.010
0002.
<0.010
<0.050
PINE BLUFF(GENERAL WATERWORKS CORP.)
<0.010
<0.005
0009.
<0.003
<0.050
WEST MEMPHIS UTILITY COMMISSION
<0.010
<0.010
0002.
<0.003
<0. 100
MAX I MUM
0.010
0.010
0074.
0.010
0.540
MINIMUM
0.000
0.001
0002.
0.000
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
&
0
7
8
8
8
STATE TOTAL 8
<000.2
001.1
<000.2
000.9
001.0
<000.2
000.3
001.1
000.2
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
<00.05
00. 08
00.12
<00.05
00. 12
<00.05
00.20
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
0.010
00.36* <0.008
00.36
00.05
1
0
0
8
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
e
LOUS I ANA
ALEXANDRIA (MUNICIPAL)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.004
0.530
000.5
00.06
ARABI(AMSTAR CORPORATION)
0.000
0.000
0.003
0081.
0.000
0.002
000.4
00.23
AVERY ISLANUtMCILHENNY COMPANY)
0.000
0.000
<0.000
0083.
0.004
0.008
000.2
01.96*
BATON ROUGE WATERWORKS CO. '
0.002
0.000
0.000
0010.
0.000
0.009
000.2
00.00
BATON ROUGE(R YAN AIRPORT)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.004
000. 1
00.12
BATON ROUGE (K AI SE R ALUMINUM £. CHEMICAL)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0009.
0.000
0.094
000.2
00.08
BATJN ROUGE(EXXON COMPANY)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0005.
0.000
0.004
000.2
00.12
BELLE CHASSE
0.001
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.006
000.3
00. 12
BER wICK-8AYOU VISTA JOINT WATERW
0.001
0.000
0.001
0045.
0.000
0.005
000.2
00.42*
BOOTHVILLE—VENICE WATERWORKS
0.001
0.000
0.000
0040.
0.000
0.009
000.5
00.08
BURNS IDE(ORMET CHEMICAL CORP.)
0.000
0.000
0.001
0033.
0.000
0.005
000.2
00.08
CAMERON { WAT ER WORKS DISTRICTED
0.005
0.000
0.001
0434.*
0.002
0.018
000.1
00.16
CAMERON'. WICHEM)
0.000
0.000
0.003
0665.*
0.003
0.005
000.2
00.22
00.22
CAMERON(BAR01D)
0.000
0.000
0.002
0519.*
0.001
0.004
000.1
00.08
CAMERONtDRESSER MAGC06AR COMPANY)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0376.*
0.003
0.008
000.1
00.06
CAMERON(CRAIN BROTHERS OFFSHORE DIVISI)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0141.
0.004
0.002
000.2
00. 12
CHALMETTf(ST.BERNARD WATER WORKS DIST.)
0.000
0.000
0.003
0050.
o.ooo
0.001
000.7
00.08
CONVENT t ST JAMES WATER WORKS DIST. #1)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0033.
0.005
0.002
000.6
00.00
CCNVENTITEXACO INC.)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.007
0.004
000.2
00.08
0.000
0. 000
<0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.005
NOTF: * INDICATES VALUF TAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSItJLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
ARKANSAS
0.020
<0.001
000.1
<0.010
0002.
0015.
<0.100
048.0
0048.
08.2 5
0161.
0530690150000
0.000
<0.001
000.2
0001.
0011.
017.0
0026.
08.80
0053.
0532310150000
o.oos
<0.001
000.3
0.004
0153.
0008.
0.036
253.4
0038.
08.10
0540320150000
<0.005
<0.001
000.6
<0.005
0002.
0009.
<0.020
161.0
0158.
08.20
0180.
0542750150000
0.004
<0.001
000.4
0.000
0016.
0000.
0.020
037.0
0038.
06. 80
0165.
0546530150000
<0.044
<0.001
000.2
<0.010
<0001.
<0003.
<0.100
014.0
0020.
07.50
0028.
0551300150000
0.020
0.001
000.4
<0.005
0020.
<0001.
<0.020
050.0
0024.
07. 10
0570110150000
<0.050
<0.001
000. 1
<0.010
0003.
0003.
<0.010
0592970150000
0.050
0.001
000.6
0.010
0153.
0015.
0.100
253.4
0158.
08.80
0180.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.001
000. 1
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.010
014.0
0020.
06. 80
0028.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
8
8
8
0
0
7
8
8
7
7
7
7
5
NO. ANALYZED
8
STATE TOTAL
LOUSIANA
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.005
0076.
0002.
0.043
140. 1
0180.
07.12
0229.
2201430150000
0.000
0.000
001.6
0.003
0.001
0038.
0064.
0.082
045.0
0142.
07.98
0330.
2202990150000
0.330*
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.002
0063.
0002.
0.014
228.6
0212.
07.26
0386.
2204680150000
0.000
0.000
000.4
0.001
0.000
0066.
0005.
0.006
144.2
0003.
08.51
0231.
2206240150000
0.000
0.000
002.5
O.OOL
0065.
0010.
0.009
132.9
0022.
08.64
0189.
2206240152000
0.000
0.300$
000.2
0.000
o.ooa
0075.
0100.
0.136
146.4
0012.
08.85
0175.
2206240199800
0.000
0.000
000.2
0.001
0.004
0068.
0009.
0.009
146.4
0146.
08.75
0219.
2206240199810
0.000
0.000
001. 1
0.000
0.001
0021.
0099.
0.011
072.1
0124.
10.22
0195.
2207450150000
0.200*
0.100$
000.9
0.001
0.000
0048.
0056.
0.020
059.2
0092.
08.91
0245.
2208710150000
0. 000
0.000
000.4
0.001
0.002
0024.
005 2.
0.008
076.6
0127.
08.32
0225.
2210420150000
0.000
0.000
001.6
0.000
0.001
0020.
0075.
0.022
031.2
0090.
09.44
0183.
2212680150000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.004
0372.
0001.
0.210
306.8
0130.
07.69
1100.*
2213650150000
0.000
0.000
000.4
0.001
0.001
0401.
0001.
0.000
356.0
0159.
07.33
1132.*
2213650199800
0.000
0.000
000.3
0.001
0.004
0350.
0001.
0.120
323.5
0132.
07.40
1011.*
2213650199810
0.040
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.002
0316.
0001.
0.006
000.0
0Q75.
07.12
1024.*
2213650199820
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.001
0183.
0000.
0.024
275.4
0870.
07.72
2213650199830
0.000
0.000
001.8
0.002
0.001
0019.
0065.
0.003
123.9
0149.
09.84
0260.
2215340150000
0.000
0.000
000.8
0.000
0.001
0025.
0072.
0.079
023.0
0098.
09.82
0190.
2218980150000
0.000
<0.000
001.0
<0.000
0.000
0025.
0059.
0.022
024.1
0061.
09.41
0176.
2218980199SOO
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HI
PAGE 48
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
CUPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIC
0.05*
1.0$
0.01$
2 50.*
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
LOUSIAMA
EMPIRE tSURAS WATER WORKS)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0035.
0.005
0.001
000.6
GRA"4£ftCY(KAI SEP ALUMINUM £ CHEMICAL CO)
0.001
0.000
0.000
0036.
0.000
0.004
000.3
GRAMERCYlCOLONIAL SUGAR CO)
0. 000
o.ooo
0.000
0027.
0.005
0.000
000.5
GRETNA WATERWORKS
0.000
0.000
0.002
0040.
0.000
0.002
000.4
CITY OF HOUMA
0.002
0.000
0.000
0030.
0.000
0.039
000.5
INTRACOSTAL CITY!SHELL MORGAN LANDING)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0036.
0.000
0.007
000.3
CITY OF LAFAYETTE
0.000
0.000
<0.000
0012.
0.000
.0000
000.2
GREATt-R LAKE CHARLES WAT5K COMPA
0.000
0.000
0.002
016d •
0.009
0.233
000.1
PORT OF LAKE CHARLES
0.000
0.000
<0.005
0048.
0.005
0.003
000.1
LAKE CHAR LE S(CONSOL I DAT 5D ALUMINUM)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0024.
0.004
0.000
000.1
PORT OF LAKE CHARLES SUL K COKE
0.000
0.000
0.001
0029.
0.004
0.014
000.2
LAKH CHARLES!CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY)
0.001
0.000
0.001
0049.
0.005
0.009
000.1
LAKE CHARLES!CITIES SERVICE UIL COMPAN)
0.000
0.000
0.001
0102.
0.005
0.005
000. 1
LIONS(ST. JOHN WATERWORKS DIST. #3)
0.001
0.000
0.000
0025.
0.000
0.006
000.3
LOCKPORT(LAFOURCHE PARISH WW DIST NO.1)
0.000
0.000
0.003
00 30.
0.000
0.002
000.6
LULINGIST. CHARLES PARISH WATER OIST.#)
0.003
0.000
0.000
0038.
0.048
0.009
000.4
MAOISONVILLE
0.000
0.000
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.004
000.1
MAR RE R 0 < W EST JEFFERSON WATERWORKS #2)
0.000
0.181
0.000
0041.
0.000
0.002
000.8
MERMENTAUIZIGLER SHIPYARD)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0072.
0.006
0.006
000.3
MERME NT AIJ C SBA SHIPYARD)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0106.
0.008
0.008
000.2
METAIRIE(E. JEFFERSON WATERWORKS DIST.)
0.000
0.180
0.000
0039.
0.000
0.003
000.8
MONROE
0.000
0.000
0.000
0014.
0.007
0.040
000.0
MORGAN CITY
0.006
0.000
0.000
0028.
0.002
0.011
000.2
NEW URLEANS(CARRr)LLTON PLANT)
0.000
0.000
0.002
0037.
0.000
0.005
000.4
NEW ORLEANS(ALGIERS PLANT)
0.001
0.000
0.002
0041.
0.000
0.000
000.4
NEW SARPY(ST. CHARLES PARISH W 0IST.U1)
0.002
0.000
0.000
0038.
0.000
0.005
000.4
POI NT E —A-LA—HACHE
0.000
o.ooo
0.000
0043.
0.000
0.006
000.4
PORT ALLEN!CARGO CARRIERS)
0.002
0.000
0.000
0012.
0.003
0.031
000.2
PORT AL LEN(PORT OF GREATER BATON ROUGE)
0.003
0.000
0.000
0011.
0.003
0.008
000.5
FREEPORT SULPHUR CO
0.001
0.000
0.000
0044.
0.000
o.ooa
000.5
RESERVE(GOOCHAUX-HENDERSGN SUGAR REFIN)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0023.
0.000
0.004
000.3
SHREVEPOPT WATER SUPPLY
0.000
00000
0.000
0035.
0.003
0.013
000. 1
WEEKS ISLAND!SHEL L OIL COMPANY)
0.001
0.000
<0.000
0023.
0.001
0.009
000.1
TOWN OF WFSTWEGO
0.002
0.000
0.002
0037.
0.000
0.002
000.5
00.5*
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.05$
00.04
0.003
00.08
00.02
0.005
00.08
<0.000
00.18
0.000
02.18*
0.000
00.00
0.000
00.02
0. 000
03.12*
0.010
00. 16
0.001
00.08
0.000
02.08*
0.000
01.12*
0.000
00.12
0.000
00.00
00.00
00.06
0.000
00.09
0.000
00.74*
0.000
00.78*
0.000
00.08
0.000
00.10
0.010
00.02
0.000
00.00
0.000
00.02
00.06
00. 12
00.78*
0.009
00.22
0.000
00.02
00.36*
0.012
00.08
0.017
00.05
0.003
00.10
0.000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 49
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
MANGANESE
MERCURY
N ITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SOOIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
0.05*
a. oo2.$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
0.000
0.000
001. L
0.000
0.001
0027.
0071.
0.020
101.0
0159.
0.000
0.000
001. 6
0.000
0.001
0026.
0070.
0.046
105.9
0173 .
0.000
0.000
000.7
0.000
0.001
0022.
0065.
0.023
055. 1
0136.
0.000
0.3001
001.5
0.002
0.000
00 32.
0066.
0.004
042.8
0102.
0.000
0.000
000. 2
0.002
0.004
0015.
0045.
0.003
047.4
0098.
0.130*
0.000
000.1
0.000
0.001
0064.
0000.
1.025
311. 1
0240.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.001
0.002
0013.
0007.
0.000
084.0
0087.
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.003
0128.
0004.
0.038
000.0
0074.
0. 300*
0.000
000.1
0.000
0.004
00 39.
0001.
0.420
166. 1
0129.
0.130*
0.006$
000.0
0.000
0.001
0057.
0000.
0.010
000.0
0072.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.002
0031.
0002.
0.120
157. 1
0125.
0.400*
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.002
0045.
0001.
0.255
147.3
0125.
0.280*
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0.003
0069.
0002.
0.009
000.0
0139.
o.oao*
0.002
000.9
0.001
0.000
0015.
0036.
0.014
076.6
0158.
0.000
<0.001
010.0
0.002
0.000
0017.
0036.
0.006
056.3
0096.
0.050
0.000
001.6
0.001
0.001
0027.
0064.
0.019
110.4
0173.
0.000
0.000
001.2
0.000
0.000
0062.
0011.
0.013
123.9
0025.
0.001
0.000
000.6
0.000
0.000
00 34.
0066.
0.002
038. 7
0109.
0.080*
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0.001
0003.
1.110
204.3
0139.
0.080*
0.070$
000.1
0.000
0.000
0004.
0. 790
219.3
0125.
0.000
0.000
000. 8
0.000
0.000
0035.
0073.
0.000
033.5
0104.
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.001
0019.
0.010
047.8
0033.
0.000
0.000
001. 0
0.000
0.000
0026.
0037.
0.008
106.7
0155.
0.000
0.000
001.4
0.000
0.001
0026.
0062.
0.008
050.0
0105.
0.000
<0.001
001.4
0.003
0.002
0021.
0068.
0.000
040.6
0099.
0.000
0.000
ooi.a
0.000
0.004
0027.
0064.
0.004
049.6
0102.
0,000
0.000
001.1
0.002
0.001
0030.
0059.
0.009
072.0
0133.
0.000
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0.000
0081.
0010.
0.135
107.6
0000.
0.000
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0.000
0092.
0009.
0.016
179.3
0002.
0.000
0.000
001.4
0.000
0.001
0.000
0032.
0074.
0.019
045.1
0102.
0.000
<0.001
000.7
0.001
0.000
0015.
0045.
0.011
058.6
0096 .
0.000
0.000
000. 1
0.000
0.002
0014.
0025.
0.017
032.1
0068.
0.030
0.000
000.0
0.001
<0.000
0018.
0000.
0.068
084.4
0010.
0. 000
0.000
001.6
0.302
0.003
0021.
0052.
0.004
125.0
0179.
PH
TOS
500.*
ID NO.
LOUSIANA
08.91
0293.
2227170150000
07.29
2099.*
2236790199800
10.15
0252.
2236790199810
09.56
0232.
2238610150000
06.87
0198.
2243940150000
07.56
0384.
2244990150000
08.77
0160.
2249790150000
07.10
0490.
2250570150000
07.30
0210.
2250570199600
07.74
0289.
2250570199810
07.19
024B.
2250570199820
07.31
0244.
2250570199830
07.30
0432.
2250570199900
09.55
0215.
2253450150000
08.75
0191.
2254860150000
08.54
0303.
2256290150000
08.58
0193.
2257070150000
09.89
0218.
2258630150000
06.88
0305.
2260190199800
07.37
0369.
2260190199810
09.90
0175.
2260510150000
07.10
0113.
2261750150000
08.23
0249.
2262920150000
09.74
0242.
2265650150000
09.75
0217.
2265650151000
08.84
0245.
2265910150000
09.80
0248.
2271640150000
09.04
0240.
2272020199800
08.82
0249.
2272020199810
09.47
0102.
2272410150000
10.07
0199.
2274750150000
08.34
0140.
2279560150000
07.10
0189.
2292170150000
08.76
0291.
2292820150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 50
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO- 06
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIOE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIOE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05i 1.0* 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
LOUSIANA
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAIL[1G *
no. failing i
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
53
0.006
0. 161
0.005
0665.
0.048
0.530
000.8
00.22
03.12
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.000
0005.
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.22
00.00
0.000
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
53
53
53
53
53
53
0
53
1
53
41
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
ALBUQUEW.QUE (SOUTHEASTERN
ALBUQUEROUtlA.T. £ S.F.
FARM I NGTlJN
GALLUP WATER SUPPLY '
RATON WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
ROSWELL
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 7
PUBLIC ScWV.C)
A ILROADJ
0.005
0.170
0.000
0012.
0.000
<0.020
0.020*
000.3
<00.05
<00.25
<0.200?
0.020*
O.UO
0.000
0020.
0.000
0.006
0.050*
000.6
00.05
00.02
0.000
0.018*
0.090
0.000
0017.
0.000
0.000
<0.050?
000.5
00.01
0.000
0.010
<0.999
<0.010
0017.
<0.010
001.7
<00.02
0.007
<0.010
<0.500
<0.010
0012.
<0.020
000.4
<00.05
01.50*
0.010
0.040*
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.1
<00.05
00.68*
<0.010
0.080
0.000
0038.
0.000
0.079
000.7
<00.05
<00.25
0.000
0, 040
0.99
-------
RUN DATE
04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER MATER SUPPLIES
REGION
NO. 06
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.*
LOUS IANA
0.400
0.300
010.0
0.000
0.003
0.008
0401.
0100.
1. 110
356. 0
0870.
10.22
2099.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0013.
0000.
0.000
000.0
0000.
06.87
0102.
MINIMUM
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
NO. FAILING *
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING «
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
51
51
53
1
52
53
50
53
53
53
53
53
52
NO. ANALYZED
53
STATE TOTAL
NEW MEXICO
0.050
<0.085?
<000.1
<0.005
0.000
00 34.
0058.
0.0 LO
123.8
0115.
07.87
0315.
3501470150000
0.000
<0.001
001.0
0.005
0.000
0036.
0066.
0.043
07.80
0324.
3501470199900
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0035.
0045.
0.036
116.0
0105.
07.60
0312.
3501470199910
<0.050
000.1
0.010
<0.020
0024.
0140.
<0.020
131.0
08.10
3529820150000
0.050
000.1
0.050
0150.
1.200
196.0
0051.
0705.*
3 534230150000
<0.050
0.000
0.000
0013.
0013.
0.000
121.0
0107.
0190.
3570970150000
<0.050
<0.001
001.5
0.000
0032.
0260.*
0.092
193.0
0493.
07.85
0670.*
3574130150000
0.050
0.005
002.0
0.010
0.050
0036.
0260.
1.200
196.0
0493.
08. 10
0705.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.001
000.1
0.000
0.000
0013.
0013.
0.000
116.0
0051.
07.60
0190.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
NO. FAILING •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
7
3
6
0
5
7
6
7
7
6
5
5
6
NO. ANALYZED
7
STATE TOTAL
OKLAHOMA
0.004
000.5
<0.001
0017.
0040.
0.035
119.0
0152.
07.10
0250.
404 7410150000
0.000
000.0
0014.
0034.
032.0
0090.
07.90
0135.
4057420150000
0050.
0087.
05*.0
0112.
09.90
0270.
4061380150000
0107.
0140.
035.0
0141.
10.00
0484.
4061380150001
0006.
0015.
031.0
0039.
09.80
0076.
4061380150002
4061380199900
0.005
000.1
0.200
0.001
0015.
0007.
0.019
093.0
0109.
07.50
0150.
4063490150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
» INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
LOCATION
OKLAHOMA
ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS ^
0.05$ l.Ot 0.0 L$ 253.* 0.05$ 1.* °*2>
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.05$
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING •
NO. FAILING i
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0.001
0.001
0
0
0
2
0220.
0009.
0
0
0
6
0.002
0.002
0
0
0
2
0.002
0.001
0
0
0
2
000.9
000.3
0
0
0
5
00.10
00. 10
0
0
0
1
00.20
00.01
0
0
0
6
0.005
0.004
0
0
0
2
TEXAS
ABILENE <0.005 <0.400 <0.005 0104. <0.020
AMARILLO MUNICIPAL wATfR SUPPLY <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0207. <0.020
CITY OF AUSTIN <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0056. <0.020
BAYTOWN(EXXON COMPANYj U.S.A.I <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0056. <0.020
CITY OF BEAUMONT <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0024. <0.020
BROWNSVILLE PUBLIC UTILITIES 0OA <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0192. <0.020
BROWNSVILLE NAVIGATION DISTRICT <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0192. <0.020
CLEBURNE!ATCHISON TOPEKA £ SANTA FE) <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0042. <0.020
CORPUS CHRIST I <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0170. <0.020
CITY OF DALLAS <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0036. <0.020
DEER PARK(UNI ON EOUITY COOPERATIVE EXC) <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0039. <0.020
DEER PARK(SHELL OIL COMPANY REFINERY! <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0003. <0.020
EL PASO PUBLIC SERVICE BOARO <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0152. <0.020
FORT WORTH MATER DEPT <0.005 <0.200 <0.005 0039. <0.030
0ALLiS FORT HORTH REG. AIRPORT <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0033. <0.020
CITY OF FREEPORT <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0346.* <0.020
FREEPORT(DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY PLANT A) <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0209. <0.020
CITY OF GALENA PARK <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0026. <0.020
GALENA PARKIWARREN PETROLEUM COMPANY! 0.006 <0.500 <0.005 0029. <0.020
GALENA PARK{I DEAL CEMENT COMPANYJ <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0027. <0.020
GALENA PARK(A MARAOA-HESS CORPORATION <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0036. <0.020
GALVESTON <0.005 <0.400 <0.005 0422.* <0.020
CITY OF HARLINGEN WATER BOARD <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0202. <0.020
CITY OF HOUSTON <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0055. <0.020
HOUSTON INTERCONTINENTAL AIRPORT <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0044. <0.020
PORT OF HOUSTON BULK DOCKS <0.005 <0.300 <0.005 0039. <0.020
HOUSTON(MANCHESTER TERMINAL COMPANY) <0.005 <0.500 <0.005 0029. <0.020
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
0.700
0.700
<0.100
<0.100
<0.100
0. 100
<0.100
<0.100
0. 100
0. LOO
0. 100
0.550
<0. 100
<0. 100
<0.100
<0.100
0.400
<0.100
0. 100
<0.100
<0.100
<0. too
001.3
001.1
001.0
001.1
000.7
001.0
001.0
001.1
000.7
000.8
000.6
000.3
000.9
000.8
000.7
000.7
000.7
001.0
000.9
000.7
000,
000.9
001.0
000.8
000.5
000.5
000.5
<00.04
<00.02
<00.02
<00.02
00.06
<00.02
00.02
00.02
00.10
<00.02
00.10
00.06
00.41*
<00.02
00.06
<00.02
00.44*
00.67*
<00.02
00.16
00.04
00.18
00.06
00.02
00.18
<00.02
00.04
<00.02
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.030
0.030
<0.020
<0.030
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT noiNKING HATER STANDARDS LIMIT
7 INO CATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIrtIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING HATER
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 4b. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
OKLAHOMA
0 QQ5 qqq 5 0.200 0.001 0107. 0140. 0.035 119.0 0152. 10.00 0484. MAXIMUM
0.000 ooolo 0.200 0.001 0006. 0007. 0.019 031.0 0039. 07.10 0076. MINIMUM
0 0 0 0
0.001
0107.
0140.
0.035
119.0
0152.
10.00
0484.
0.001
0006.
0007.
0.019
031.0
0039.
07.10
0076.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
6
2
6
6
6
6
NO. FAILING *
0 0000 o 0 0 0 0 0 00 NO. FAILING $
0 0000 000000 00 NO.FAILING ?
3 0 3 10 2 66266 66 NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
<0.050
<0.001
001.3
<0.001
<0.050
0.002
002.7
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
001.7
<0.001
<0. 050
<0.001
000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
001.2
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
001.3
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
001. 7
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
0.070*
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
001.0
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
002. 1
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
000.6
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
ooo.a
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
0.060*
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
000.8
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.050
<0.001
000.'4
<0.001
<0.020
0067.
0087.
<0.100
043.0
<0.020
0193.
0199.
<0.100
174.0
<0.020
0029.
0036.
<0.100
051.0
<0.020
0165.
0005.
<0. 100
298.0
<0.020
0013.
0029.
<0.100
022.0
<0.020
0151.
0274.*
<0.100
140.0
<0.020
0151.
0274.*
<0. 100
140.0
<0.020
0228.
0096.
<0.100
337.0
<0.020
0090.
0071.
<0.100
094.0
<0.020
0029.
0048.
<0.100
047.0
<0.020
0096.
0013.
0.100
216.0
<0.020
0108.
0014.
0.100
217.0
<0.020
0127.
0160.
<0. 100
033.0
<0.010
0023.
0024.
0.200
105.0
<0.020
0025. '
0025.
0. 100
084.0
<0.020
035 7.
<0004.
1.200
0463.
<0.020
0339.
<0004.
0.210
550.0
<0.020
0071.
0014.
0.200
191.0
<0.020
0064.
0014.
0.200
187.0
<0.020
0084.
0013.
0.200
198.0
<0.020
0086.
0012.
0.300
ia9.o
<0.020
0350.
<0004.
<0.100
272.0
<0.020
0159.
0284.*
0. 100
083,0
<0.020
0115.
0061.
0.100
239.0
<0.020
0076.
0006.
0.100
199.0
<0.020
0125.
0006.
0.800
240.0
<0.020
0068.
0016.
<0.100
200.0
TEXAS
0124.
09.40
0346.
4800150150000
0246.
08.30
0900.*
4802250150000
0102.
09.90
0193.
4804200150000
0033.
08.10
0600.*
4806000150000
0058.
07.90
0117.
4806100150000
0382.
07.80
0920.*
4811300150000
0382.
07.80
0920.*
481 1300163000
0013.
08.30
0780.*
4818150150000
0204.
08.00
0520.*
4820300150000
0086.
07.60
0205.
4822700150000
0073.
08.20
0440.
4823350199800
0057.
08.50
0442 .
4823350199810
0144.
09.40
0510.*
482 8450150000
0134.
07.70
0264.
4832200150000
0113.
07.90
0228.
4832200199700
0154.
08.40
1319.*
4832700150000
0104.
08.50
1240.*
4832 700199 800
0084.
07.80
0375.
4833700150000
0100.
07.70
0372.
4833 700199900
0065.
08.00
0390.
4833700199910
0067.
07.80
0390.
4833700199920
0105.
08.20
1140.*
4833800150000
0313.
07.80
0860.*
4838900150000
0072.
08.40
0490.
4841400150000
0098.
08.20
0407.
4841400199 700
0028.
08. 10
0473.
4841400199800
0107.
08.40
0394.
4841400199810
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE-FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
PUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
¦REGION NO. 06
LOCATION
TEXAS
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1•*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00. 3*
I NGLES IDE
<0.005
<0.300
<0.005
oiai.
<0.020
<0.100
000.3
CITY OF KILLEFN
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0045.
<0.020
0.300
001.0
LAREDO
0081.
000.6
LUBBOCK
<0.005
<0.200
<0.005
0293.*
<0.020
<0.200
001.5
LUBBOCK REGIONAL AIRPORT
<0.005
<0.200
<0.005
0081.
<0.030
<0.100
002.5
CITY OF MCALLEN
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0141.
<0.020
0.100
000.8
MIDLAND REGIONAL AIR TERMINAL WA
<0.006
<0.300
<0.005
0075.
<0.020
<0. 100
001.2
NEDERLAND
<0.005
<0.300
<0.005
0027.
<0.002
<0.100
000.1
ORANGE
<0.005
<0.300
<0.005
0112.
<0.020
0.400
000.6
PASAOENAIPHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY*
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0031.
<0.020
<0.100
0.050* 000.6
PASADENA!ATLANTIC-RICHFI6LD REFINING
CI
<0.005
<0.200
<0.005
0085.
<0.020
002.5
POINT COMFORT(ALCOA (ALUMINUM CO. OF
A)
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0146.
<0.020
<0.100
001.1
PORT ARANSASCNUECES COUNTY WCID NO. '
<0.005
<0.300
<0.005
0181.
<0.020
<0.100
000.3
CITY OF PORT ARTHUR
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0026.
<0.020
0.100
000.5
PORT ARTHUR{MFS 8ARGE S—2 »
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0026.
<0.020
0. 100
000.5
PORT ARTHUR(MFS BARGE NO. 2)
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0026.
<0.020
0. 100
000.5
PORT ARTHUR(T EXAS CO PT ARTHUR PLANT
HJ
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0200.
<0.020
<0.100
000.5
PORT ARTHUR(MAP INE FUEL SER MOBIL MIDSI
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0026.
<0.020
0. 100
000.5
PORT ARTHUKtAMERICAN PETPOFINA)
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0025.
<0.020
<0.100
000.3
PORT ISABEL(CAMERON COUNTY FWSD # 11
<0.005
<0.500
o.ooa
0285.*
<0.020
<0.100
001.1
TEXAS COMPANY PORT NECHES PLANT
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0024.
<0.020
<0.100
000.3
CITY OF SAN ANGELO
<0.005
<0.400
<0.005
0357.*
<0.002
0. 100
000.6
SAN ANTONIO
<0.005
<0.200
<0.005
0014.
<0.02 0
<0.100
000.3
SANQE RSON(TERRELL COUNTY WCGIO #1)
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0015.
<0.020
<0.100
000.5
SMITH'SflLUFKUNlON OIL COMPANY OF CAL IJ
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0540.*
<0.020
<0.100
000.8
SUN S TAT I ON(S UN OIL COMDANY)
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0204.
<0.020
0. 100
001.0
CITY OF TEMPLE
<0.010
<0.500
<0.005
0048.
<0.020
<0.100
000.6
CITY OF TEMPLE,ORAUGHN MILLER AI
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0216.
<0.020
<0.100
002.1
CITY OF TEXARKANA
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0024.
<0.020
<0. 100
000.3
TEXAS CITYi MONSANTO CHEMICAL CO.I
<0.005
<0.200
<0.002
0071.
<0.020
<0.100
000.3
TEXAS CITY TERMINAL k.R. CO.
<0.005
<0.200
<0. 002
0192.
<0.020
<0.100
000.7
VICTORIA
0091.
000.4
WACO AIRPORT
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0043.
<0.020
<0.100
001.3
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS
<0.005
<0.500
<0.005
0133.
<0.020
<0.100
000.9
<00.02
<00.02
00.02
<00.02
00. 13
00.02
00.10
<00.02
00.48*
00.54*
00.06
00.04
<00.02
<00.02
<000.0
<00.02
00. 16
<00.02
00.10
00.06
00. 10
<00.02
<00.02
<00.02
00.40*
00.08
<00.02
00.15
<00.02
00.52*
00.36*
<00.02
<00.02
LEAO
0.05$
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.030
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
NOTt: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE OR INKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
MANGANESE
ME RCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.0024
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05 i
250.*
5.*
500.*
TEXAS
<0.050
<0.001
00013
<0.001
<0.020
0099.
0080.
<0.100
167.0
0286.
08.00
0670.*
4843050150000
<0.050
<0.001
000. 8
<0.001
<0.020
0026.
0024.
<0.100
126.0
0163.
08.20
0309.
4847000150000
0.050
005.5
0080.
0183.
120.0
0260.
07.60
0590.*
4849500150000
<0.050
<0.005?
001.0
0.001
<0.002
0276.
0291.*
<0.100
164.0
0273.
07.80
1150.*
4853950150000
<0.050
<0.001
005.3
<0.004
<0.010
0057.
0097.
0.400
250.0
0336.
07.90
0650.*
4853950199700
<0.050
<0.001
001.2
<0.001
<0.020
0121.
0244.
<0. 100
101.0
0295.
07.80
0730.*
4854550150000
<0.050
<0.001
0 L 7.0
<0.001
<0.020
0060.
0119.
<0.100
215.0
0318.
07.40
0650.*
4859000150000
<0.050
<0.001
001.3
<0.001
<0.020
0034.
0040.
<0.100
025.0
0031.
08.00
0144.
4862750150000
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.020
0122.
<0004.
<0.100
150.0
0042.
07.40
0433.
4866500150000
0.070*
<0.001
000.4
<0.001
<0.020
0079.
0017.
<0.100
207.0
0100.
08.20
0417.
4868450199800
<0.050
<0.001
<000.4
<0.001
<0.020
0221.
<0004.
<0.100
375.0
0016,
08.40
0770.*
4868450199810
<0.050
<0.001
000.2
<0.001
<0.020
0221.
0012.
<0.100
289.0
0025.
08.40
0740.*
4871590150000
<0.050
<0.001
001.3
<0.001
<0.020
0099.
0080.
<0.100
167.0
0286.
08.00
0670.*
48 71900150000
<0.050
<0.001
001.0
<0.001
<0.020
0027.
0034.
<0.100
018.0
0031.
07.30
0121.
4871950150000
<0.050
-------
RUN DATE 04—0 L-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
LOCATION
TEXAS
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ I.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.2$ 00.5#
IRON
00. 3»
LEAD
0.05$
MAX I HUM
0.010
0.500
0.008
05*0.
0.030
0.700
0.050
002.5
00.04
00.67
MINIMUM
0.005
0.200
0.002
0003.
0.002
0. 100
0.050
000. 1
00.04
000.0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
8
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO . F A r L I N'» ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ND. ANALYZED
59
59
59
61
59
58
1
61
1
60
STATE TOTAL
0.030
0.020
0
0
0
59
61
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING «
NO. FAILING i
MO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
HEGIC'N TdTAL
0.040
0.999
0.010
0665.
0.048
0. 700
0.050
002.5
00.22
03. 12
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.000
0.020
000.0
00.04
00.00
3
0
0
10
0
0
3
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
126
119
128
134
127
128
4
133
8
134
0.200
0.000
0
0
1
117
136
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
» INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 06
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TOS
0.05*
0 .002$
45 . *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.
0.070
0.005
017.0
0.004
0.020
0402.
0331.
1.200
550.0
0426.
09.90
1319.
0.050
0.001
000.2
0.001
0.002
0009.
0002.
0. 100
010.0
0013.
06.80
0108.
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
59
61
0
59
59
60
61
59
61
61
61
61
i
0.400
0.300
017.0
0.200
0.010
0.050
0402.
0331.
1.200
550.0
0870.
10.22
2099.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.000
000.0
0000.
06. 80
0028.
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
35
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
129
121
131
2
116
128
130
135
128
133
132
132
130
61
10 NO.
TEXAS
MAX I HUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
STATE TOTAL
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING »
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
136 REGION TOTAL
NOTES * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS Of CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
HBO ION NO. 07
LOCATION
IOWA
ARSENIC BARIUM
0.05$ 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMTUM COPPER
0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.#
CYANIDE FLUORIOE ASS IRON LEAD
0-2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
CEDAR 'RAP I OS A I SPORT
CEOAS PAPIDS CITY WATER SUPPLY
DAVEMPORT WAT EP COMPANY
DES MOINES WATER WORKS
CITY OF LiUSUQUE WATER DEPARTMENT
FORT MADISON MUN. WATER iUPPLY
MASON CITY MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
OTTUMWA WATE3 WORKS
WATERLOO WATER WORKS
MAX IMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 9
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 07
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
IOWA
<0.010
<0.001
000.5
0.005
<0.010
0007.
0019.
<0.010
264.0
0264.
07.90
0301.
1915030150000
<0.010
0.000
001.3
<0.005
<0.010
0012.
0041.
0.010
052.0
0104.
09.10
0159.
1915030150000
<0.010
<0.001
006.1
0.600
<0.005
<0.010
0007.
0061.
0.290
116.0
0196.
06.90
0273.
1922320150000
<0.010
<0.001
017.0
<0.005
<0.001
0016.
0070.
<0.010
048.0
0106.
08.20
0183.
1924120150000
0.020
0.000
000.5
<0.005
<0.010
0012.
0032.
<0.010
056.0
0080.
09.30
1926100150000
0.000
<0.001
004.0
0.500
<0.005
0.000
0010.
0031.
0.016
094.0
0144.
08.60
0225.
1932400150000
0.006
0.000
001.2
<0.005
0.000
0036.
0076.
0.050
342.0
0350.
07.80
0419.
1957600150000
0.010
<0.001
020.0
0.500
<0.005
<0.010
0008.
0081.
<0.010
004.0
0124.
08.30
0286.
1969570150000
<0.010
<0.001
014.0
<0.005
0.010
0004.
0056.
0.040
208.0
0248.
07.15
0290.
1993510150000
0.020
0.001
020.0
0.600
0.005
0.010
0036.
0081.
0.290
342.0
0350.
09.30
0419.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.5
0.500
0.005
0.000
0004.
0019.
0.010
004.0
0080.
06.90
0159.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING »
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
9
9
9
3
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
NO. ANALYZED
9
STATE TOTAL
KANSAS
0.000
<0.001
003.8
0.400
<0.005
0.000
0014.
0032.
0.000
050.0
0740.
08.50
0130.
2029260150000
0.000
<0.001
016.0
0. 100
0.010
0.000
0066.
0208.
0.000
190.0
0307.
07.30
0575.*
2033550150000
0.000
0.000
002.3
0.000
0067.
0117.
0.000
054.0
0156.
08.20
0381.
2046540150000
0.000
0.000
014.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0029.
0066.
0.000
182.0
0214.
07.50
0334.
2052140150000
0.000
0.000
008.6
<0.005
0.000
0038.
0041.
0.120
320.0
0298.
07.30
0440.
2056430199700
0.000
<0.001
008.6
0.100
<0.005
0.000
0026.
0032.
0.000
166.0
0168.
07.00
0275.
2065010150000
0.000
0.000
005.2
0.005
0.000
0070.
0106.
0.060
057.0
0117.
09.01
0345.
2089320150000
0.000
0.000
001.4
0.300
<0.005
0.000
0085.
0075.
0.030
076.0
0104.
07.60
0361.
2097130150000
0.000
0.000
011.0
0.100
<0.005
0.000
0095.
0027.
0.390
236.0
0120.
07.30
0378.
209 7130154000
0.000
0.001
016.0
0.400
0.010
0.000
0095.
0208.
0.390
320.0
0740.
09.01
0575.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
001.4
0.000
0.000
0.000
0014.
0027.
0.000
050.0
0104.
07.00
0130.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
9
9
9
6
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
NO. ANALYZED
9
STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDEO LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 34-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 07
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
ABS
IRON
LEAD
O.Obt
1.0$
O.OLS
250. *
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
00.5*
00. 3*
0.05$
Missouri
CABOULIMia AMERICA OA I r! Y'l FN )
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
000.5
<00.25
00.01
0.000
CAPE GIRARJ>£AU MO. UTILITIES CO.
<0.004
<0. 100
<0.005
0027.
<0.004
0.010
<0.004
000.8
00. 10
00.12
<0.008
JEFFERSON CITV1CAPITAL CITY WATER COMP)
<0.005
0.180
0. 000
0029.
0.000
0.130
<0.02 0?
001.0
<00.25
00.03
0.000
JOPLIN WATER wOPKS COMPANY
<0.004
<0.100
<0.005
000 7.
<0.004
<0.010
<0.004
000. 1
00.25
00.02
0.008
KANSAS CITY MISSOURI MUNICIPAL
<0.005
0.220
0.000
0023.
0.000
0. 150
<0.020?
000.3
<00.25
00.00
0.000
ST. LOUIS COUNTY WATER COMPANY
<0.010
<0.200
0.000
0020.
<0.005
<0.014
<0.020?
000.9
<00.25
00.04
<0.005
ST. LOUIS MUNICIPAL
<0.032
0.016
0.004
0026.
0.003
0.009
<0.004
000.9
00.25
00.02
<0.004
ST. LOUIS MUNICIPALICHAIN OF ROCKS)
<0.002
0.018
0.004
0025.
0.004
0.006
000.9
00.02
<0.004
SPRINGFIELD MUNICIPAL
<0.004
<0.100
<0.005
0015.
<0.004
<0.010
<0.004
000.1
00.25
00.00
<0.008
MAXIMUM
0.010
0.220
0.005
0029.
0.005
0.150
0.020
001.0
00.25
00. 12
0.008
MINIMUM
0.002
0.018
0.000
0007.
0.000
0.000
0.004
000.1
00.10
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
9
9
9
9
9
9
8
9
8
9
9
STATE TOTAL 9
NEBRASKA
GERINClSCOTTS BLUFF COUNTY AIRPORT)
<0.005
0.060
0.000
0017.
0.000
0.046
<0.02 0?
001.4
00.25
00.03
0.000
LINCOLN MUNICIPAL
<0.005
0.140
0.000
0016.
0.000
0.024
<0.020?
001.0
<00.25
0.000
0.012
MCCOOK MUNICIPAL
0.010
0.085
0.000
0020.
0.000
0.030
<0.02 0?
000.4
00.25
00.02
0.000
NEBRASKA CITY MUNICIPAL
0.005
0.120
0.000
0020.
0.000
0.096
0.02 0*
001.2
00.25
00.53*
0.000
OMAHAIMETROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT)
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0017.
0.000
0.084
<0.020?
001.0
<00.25
00.18
0.036
MAXIMUM
0.010
0.140
0.000
0020.
0.000
0.096
0.020
001.4
00.25
00.53
0.036
MINIMUM
0.005
0.050
0.000
0016.
0.000
0.024
0.020
000.4
00.25
0.000
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
STATE TOTAL 5
NOTE! * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER
STANOAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER
STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OAT 6 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 07
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCc SELENIUM SILVER
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5. *
ALKAL
HARONESS PH
TOS
500.*
10 NO.
MISSOURI
0.000
<0.001
<00 L.O
0.030
<0.005
0.000
0002.
<0025.
0.030
07.40
0249.
291182 0150000
0.000
0.000
005.3
<0.010
<0.005
0017.
0064.
<0.010
141.0
0219.
08.10
0377.
2912640150000
0.000
<0.001
001.0
0.400
<0.005
0.000
0038.
0176.
0.020
033.0
0096.
08.60
0385.
2941580150000
0.000
0.000
007.9
0.200
<0.010
<0.005
0003.
0007.
0.030
092.0
0106.
07.50
0139.
2941880150000
0.000
<0.005?
<001.0
0.400
<0.005
0.000
0037.
0184.
0.010
055.3
0149.
09.00
0374.
2942180150000
<0.003
0.000
003. 1
0.700
<0.010
<0.002
0014.
0077.
0.030
053. 7
0103.
09.75
0209.
2971400150000
0.002
0.001
004.6
0.400
<0.001
0.002
0027.
0094.
0.023
047.7
0106.
09.56
0254.
2971400151000
0.003
0.000
005.4
0.002
0.002
0024.
0089.
0.008
052.5
0106.
09.51
024 7.
2971400151001
0.003
0.000
011.0
0.200
<0.010
<0.005
0004.
0025.
<0.050
142.0
0162.
07.80
0204.
2975300150000
0.003
0 .005
OU.O
0.700
0.010
0.005
0038.
0184.
0.050
142.0
0219.
09.75
0385.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
001.0
0.030
0.001
0.000
0002.
0007.
0.003
033.0
0096.
07.40
0139.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
9
9
9
7
9
9
9
9
9
8
8
9
9
NO. ANALYZED
9
STATE TOTAL
NEBRASKA
0.005
0.001
012.0
0.600
<0.005
0.000
00 79.
0160.
0.150
07.60
0600.*
3135400199700
0.000
<0.005?
001. 8
0.200
<0.005
0.000
0046.
0136.
0.010
184.0
0236.
07. 70
0480.
3151600150000
0.005
<0.001
022.0
0.200
0.007
0.000
0083.
0120.
0.027
364.0
0360.
07.60
0653.*
3154150150000
0.045
0.005$
002.0
0.300
0.005
0.000
0059.
0140.
0.045
272.0
0308.
08.00
0390.
3161950150000
0.003
<0.001
004.0
0.600
<0.005
0.000
0056.
0195.
0.230
070.0
0150.
08.60
0389.
3166450150000
0.045
0.005
022.0
0.600
0.007
0.000
0083.
0195.
0.230
364.0
0360.
08.60
0653.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.001
001 .8
0.200
0.005
0.000
0046.
0120.
0.010
070.0
0150.
07.60
0389.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO. FAILING *
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING t
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
5
5
NO. ANALYZED
5
STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VAtUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-0L-75
results of chemical analyses for
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 07
LOCATION
ARSENIC BAR IUM
0.05* 1.0$
CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER
0.01* 250.* 0.05$ 1.*
CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS
0.2$ 00.5*
IRON
00.3*
LEAD
0.09$
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
REGION TOTAL
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
31
0.400
0.000
0
0
0
31
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
32
32
0100.
0001.
0
0
0
32
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
32
0.700
0.000
0
0
0
32
0.050
0.000
2
0
15
25
001.4
000.1
0
0
0
32
00.39
00.00
0
0
0
30
00.53
00.00
1
0
0
32
0.036
0.000
0
0
0
32
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
» INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER. WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 07
4ANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
0. 05*
0.002S
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.
0.045
0.005
022.0
0.700
0.010
0.010
0095.
0208.
0.390
364.0
0740.
09.75
0653.
0.000
0.000
000.5
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
0007.
0.000
004.0
0060.
06.90
0130.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
32
32
21
31
32
32
32
32
30
30
32
31
32
10 NO.
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING 7
NO. ANALVZEO
REGION TOTAL
NOTE! * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
LOCATfOM
COLORADO
ANT WITf;
ASPeN
AURJPA
BOULOER
COLORADO SPRINGS(PINE VALLEY TREAT, PT)
COLOKAUO SPRINGS*MORTHFIcLO TREAT. PL A)
CUL.JPAUO SPPINGS1MESA WATER TREAT PIT.)
OCNVt'R lidAPt) OF WATER C!">MM1SS I ON
DENVER P3JRNHAM YARD)
OUR ANf>0
GRAN} JUNCTION MUNICIPAL
GPANQ J UNO TI 3 N(UTE WATPP. CONSERVANCY
LA JUNTA
PUEBLU
MAX I MUM
MINI MUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.F A IL IMG ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
D)
o!o5tC C;D3SH CHp = ^1DE CHR0M1UM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
250.* a.051 I.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.0
0.005
0.120
0.000
0.000
0.000
<0.005
0. 080
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
C.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.005
0.120
0.000
O.DOO
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
9
14
0010.
0007.
0035.
oou,
<0010.
<0010.
<0010.
<0013.
<0010.
oou.
<0010.
<0010.
0060.
0015.
0060.
000 7.
0
0
0
14
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
14
0. 130
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.019
0.010
0. 000
0.023
0.000
0.004
0.004
0. 180
0.070
0.180
0.000
0
0
0
14
<0
<0,
<0,
<0,
<0.
<0.
¦ 02 0?
02 0?
02 0?
02 0?
02 07
020?
0. 000
0.020
o.ooo
0
0
6
7
FLUORIOE A6S
IRON
LEAD
00.5*
00. 3*
o.ost
000. 1
00.05
00.01
0.000
000.9
00.00
0.000
001.3
00.00
00.02
0.000
001.0
00.00
00.05
0.000
000.3
<00.25
00.00
0.000
001.5
<00.25
00.00
0.000
002.3
<00.25
<00.00
0.000
002.0
<00.25
00.03
0.000
001.1
<00.05
00.03
0.000
001.4
00.00
00.40*
0.000
001.0
<00.25
00.01
0.000
000.6
<00.25
00.08
0. 000
001.5
00.00
00.00
0.000
000.4
00.00
00.20
0.000
002.3
00.25
00.40
0.000
000. 1
00.00
00.00
0.000
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
13
14
14
MONTANA
ANACONDA!BUTTE WATER COMPANY)
BILLINGS
BUTTE WATER COMPANY
GLENUIVE
GREAT FAlLS
HAVRE
LIVINGSTON
MISSOULA! MONTANA POWER C;1MP4NY
MISSOULA AIRPORT WATER SUPPLY
WMlTEFISHt BURLINGTON NORTHERN)
WATER u)
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
0.065
<0.050
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
<0010.
<0010.
<0013.
0022.
oou.
0009.
<0010.
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO, 08
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TOS
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250. *
5.*
500.*
0.000
0.005$
002.0
0.005
0.000
0005.
0025.
0.009
07.40
0108.
0.000
000.0
0.000
0002.
0100.
0.000
L68.0
0212.
0255.
0.000
000.0
0.000
0038.
0.000
084.0
0110.
0208.
0.000
000.0
0.000
0001.
0010.
0.000
016.0
0028.
0040.
0.000
0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0008.
<0025.
0.190
07.40
0116.
O.QOO
0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0006.
<0025.
0.110
07.20
0092.
0.013
<0.001
001.0
<0.005
0.000
0011.
<0025.
0.038
07.10
0074.
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0004.
0029.
0.009
07.60
0116.
0.003
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0071.
<0025.
0.320
07.70
0179.
0.020
000.0
0.000
0002.
0015.
0.000
108.0
1230.
0145.
0.000
0.001
<001.0
0.300
<0.005
0.000
0004.
0036.
0.059
080.0
0162.
07.60
0133.
0.018
<0.000
001.0
<0.005
0.000
0004.
<0025.
0.040
07.80
0092.
0.000
000.0
0.013
0160.
0978.*
0.000
292.0
0949.
1854.*
0.000
003.0
0.200
0.001
0019.
0097.
0.000
056.0
0140.
0224.
0.020
0.005
003.0
0.300
0.013
0.000
0160.
0978.
0.320
292.0
1230.
07.80
1854.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.200
0.000
0.000
0001.
0010.
0.000
016.0
0028.
07. 10
0040.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
8
14
2
14
a
13
14
14
7
7
8
14
14
10 NO.
COLORADO
0802520150000
0804320150000
0804870 L50000
0808820150000
0818180150000
0818180150001
0818180150002
0823580150000
0823580199800
0825740150000
0838340150000
0838340154 000
0852920150000
0874520150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
MONTANA
0.000
002.0
0.100
<0.005
0.000
0004.
<0025.
0.038
08.10
3001620150000
0.025
<0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0031.
0100.
0.052
07.40
0305.
3007740150000
0.012
<0.000
<001.0
0.200
<0.005
0.000
0008.
<0025.
0.080
07.60
0124.
3012240150000
0.011
<0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0170.
0260.*
0.005
133.2
0060.
07.80
0498.
3034920150000
0.000
<0.000
<001.0
<0.002
0.000
0050.
0.005
08. 10
0264.
3036360150000
0.002
<0.005 7
001.0
0.005
0094.
0.009
06.90
0269.
3038700150000
0.000
0.007$
003.0
<0.005
0.000
0016.
0035.
0.012
07.50
0296.
3050760150000
0.000
<0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0001.
<0025.
0.026
06.80
0029.
3057960150000
0.000
0.000
001.8
<0.010
0.000
<0001.
0.014
07.40
0091.
3057960199700
0.000
<0.001
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0001.
0025.
0.080
07.60
0093.
3091445150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
MONTANA
MAXIMUM
0. 010
0.100
0.001
0022.
0.009
0.031
0.020
000.8
00.25
00.10
0.014
MINIMUM
0.005
0.050
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.003
0.020
000,1
00.05
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
10
10
10
10
10
10
4
10
10
10
10
STATE TOTAL 10
NORTH DAKOTA
BISMARCK MUNICIPAL
<0.010
<0001.
<0.050
0.080
000.8
00.20
<0.050
CITY OF FARGO
<0.010
<0001.
<0.050
0.060
001.0
00.40*
<0.050
CITY OF GRANO FORKS
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
ooii.
<0.050
0.080
001.0
00.05
00.20
<0.050
MANDAN MUNICIPAL
<0.010
0001.
<0.050
0.080
000. 8
00.10
<0.050
CITY OF MINOT
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
0042.
<0.050
0.080
<0.010
001.0
00.20
<0.050
MAX IMUM
0.010
0.050
0.010
0042.
0.050
0.080
0.010
001.0
00.05
00.40
0. 050
MINIMUM
0.005
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.050
0.060
0.010
000.8
00.05
00.10
0.050
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
2
z
5
5
5
5
1
5
1
5
5
STATE TOTAL 5
SOUTH DAKOTA
RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL
RAPID CITY AIRPORT
SIOUX FALLS MUNICIPAL
<0.007 0.000 0002. 0.000 0.020 <0.005 001.2 <00.05
<0.007 0.000 0009. 0.000 0.009 <0.005 000.4 00.06
0.005 0.050 0.000 0029. 0.000 0.016 001.3 00.05
00.08 0.014
00.53* 0.014
00.06 0.000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ I NO ICATfcS VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. OS
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TOS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ O.Oli 0.05* 250.* 5.* 500.*
MONTANA
0.025
0.007
003.0
0.200
0.0 LO
0.005
0170.
0260.
0.080
L33.2
0060.
08.10
0.000
0.000
001.0
0. 100
0.002
0.000
0001.
0001.
0.005
133.2
0060.
06.80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
9
10
2
9
10
7
10
10
1
1
10
0498. MAXIMUM
0029. MINIMUM
0 NO. FAILING *
0 NO. FAILING S
0 NO.FAILING ?
9 NO. ANALYZED
10 STATE TOTAL
NORTH DAKOTA
0.120*
001.2
0070.
0144.
0.200
070.0
1230.
08.50
0383 .
3809440150000
0.100*
002.3
0020.
0020.
0.140
110.0
0130.
08.90
0287.
3830560150000
0.100*
0.000
001.9
0.002
0.000
0025.
0043.
<0.010
080.0
0109.
08.80
0197.
3838080150000
0.060*
001.6
0070.
0200.
0.200
060.0
0120.
08.60
0424.
3858080150000
0.100*
003.0
<0.010
<0.010
0165.
0198.
0.160
130.0
0092.
08.80
0620.*
3862880150000
0. 120
Q.OQO
003.0
0.010
0.010
0165.
0200.
0.200
130. 0
1230.
oa.90
0620.
MAXIMUM
0.06 0
0.000
001.2
0.002
0.000
0020.
0020.
0.010
060.0
0092.
08.50
0197.
MINIMUM
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
5
1
5
0
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
NO. ANALYZED
5
STATE TOTAL
SOUTH DAKOTA
0.010 000.0
0.020 000.0
0.010 0.000 000.0
0.100 <0.002 0.000 0005. 0032. 0.006 163.8 0202.
0.005 0.000 0056. 0293.* 0.018 333.0 0513.
0.003 0.000 0027. 0219. 0.006' 025.4 0246.
07.71 0244.
07.38 0801.*
08.55 0453»
4671460150000
4671460199700
4678660150000
NOTE: * INOICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
t INOICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENOED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 68
-------
RUN DATE J4-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER MATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
L DC AT I ON
SJUTH i)AKOTA
ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE A8S IRON LEAJLt
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.# 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.007
0.005
0
0
0
3
0.050
0.050
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
3
0029.
0002.
0
0
0
3
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
3
0.020
0.009
0
0
0
3
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
2
00 L. 3
000
.4
0
0
0
00.06
00. 05
0
0
0
3
00.53
00.06
1
0
0
3
0.014
0.000
0
0
0
3
UTAH
OGOEN
OGDfcN UNION RAILWAY £ DEPOT CO.
SALT LAKE CITY
MAXIMUM
MIN IMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 3
<0.005
0.010
0.010
0.005
0
0
o
2
0.050
0.031
0.050
0.031
0
0
0
2
0. 000
0.009
0.009
0.000
0
0
0
2
0009.
0038.
0038.
0009.
0
0
0
2
0.000
0.005
0.005
0.000
0
0
0
2
0.008
0.008
.008
.ooa
0
0
0
2
<0.020? <000.1
0.005 000.0
000.4
0.020
0.005
000.4
000.0
<00.25
00.03
00.25
00.03
00.01
00.01
00.05
00.05
00.01
o.ooo
0.0l<3
.019
.000
0
0
0
2
WYOMING
CASPER MUNICIPAL WATEi? SUPPLY
CHEYENNE MUM. WATER SUPPLY
GREEN RIVER WATER PLANT PAC. POW
JACKSON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
<0.005
0.005
<0.005
0.054
0.055
<0.150
0.000
0.000
0.000
0015.
0010.
0012.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
0.025
0.030
<0.002
0.020*
<0.02 0?
000.4
000.7
000.2
<00.25
00.25
<00.25
00. 13
00.12
00.03
0.000
0.000
0.000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002* 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05* 250.# 5.* 500.*
SOUTH DAKOTA
0.020 0.000 000.0 0.100 0.005 0.000 0056. 0293. O.Ola 333.0 0513. 08.55 0801. MAXIMUM
0.010 0.000 000.0 0.100 0.002 0.000 0005. 0032. 0.006 025.4 0202. 07.38 0244. MINIMUM
0 0000 0 0 1 0 0 0 01 NO. FAILING *
0 0 0 00 0 0 0000 00 NO. FAILING *
0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 NO. FAILING ?
3 1313 333333 33 NO. ANALYZED
3 STATE TOTAL
UTAH
0.000
0.005
0.002
0.005
0.000
0
0
0
3
<0.001
0.001
0.001
0
0
0
1
008.0
009.8
009.8
008.0
0
0
0
2
0.100
0.100
0. 100
0
0
0
1
<0.005
0.002
0.005
0.002
0
0
0
2
0.000
0.009
0.009
0.000
0
0006.
00 20.
0020.
0006.
0
0
0
2
<002 5.
0144.
0144.
0025.
0
0
0
2
0.039
0.053
0.053
0.039
0
0
0
2
213.0
213.0
213.0
0
0
0
1
0368.
0368.
0368.
0
0
0
1
07.40 0166.
07.90
07.60 0524.#
07.90
07.40
0
0
0
3
0524.
0166.
1
0
0
2
4964940150000
4964940199900
4977860150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING ~
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALY2€D
STATE TOTAL
0.025 <0.000 004.0
0.035 0.001 -02.00
0.000 002.0
0.050 <0.005 0.000
0.005 0.000
<0.005 0,000
0027. 0148. 0.090
0002. 0025. 0.015
0047. 0204. 0.006
192.0 0214. 07.70
0058. 07.80
0215. 08.00
WYOMING
0413. 5615580150000
0097. 561672OL50000
0466. 5640280150000
5647500150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-0 1-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER HATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05S
WYOMING
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
IMO. FA I LI NO *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
3
0.150
0.054
0
0
0
3
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
3
00 15.
0010,
0
0
0
3
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
3
0.045
0.025
0
0
0
3
0.020 000.7
00.25 00.13
0.002
1
0
1
3
000.2
0
0
0
3
00.25
0
0
0
3
00.03
0
0
0
3
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
3
MAX I MUM
0.010
0.150
0.010
0060.
0.050
0.180
0.020
002.3
00.25
00.53
0.050
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
34
27
37
37
37
37
19
38
32
38
37
REGION TOTAL 39
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIES WATER. SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 08
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.002$
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SOOIUM
SULFATE
250.*
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL HARDNESS PH
TDS
500.*
10 NO.
WYOMING
0. 035
0.000
0
0
0
3
0.120
0,000
5
0
0
38
0.001
0.000
0
0
0
2
0.007
0.000
0
2
1
22
004.0
02.00
0
0
0
3
009.8
000.0
0
0
0
37
0.050
0.050
0
0
0
1
0.300
0.050
0
0
0
7
0.005
0.005
0
0
0
3
0.013
0.000
0
0
0
33
0.000
0.000
0
0
o
3
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
26
0047.
0002.
0
0
0
3
0170.
0001.
0
0
0
33
0204.
0025.
0
0
0
3
0S78 .
0001.
3
0
0
37
0.090
0.006
0
0
0
3
0.320
0.000
0
0
0
37
192.0
0215.
08.00
0466.
MAXIMUM
192.0
0058.
07.70
0097.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
1
3
3
3
NO. ANALYZED
4
STATE TOTAL
333.0
1230.
08.SO
1854.
MAXIMUM
016.0
0028.
06.80
0029.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
4
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING S
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
16
20
32
36
NO. ANALYZED
39
REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
-------
RUN DAT £ 04-0 1-71>
RESULTS Of CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOP
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
LOCAT I .IN
I ZONA
LAKE HAVC.SU CITY(L.HAVASU IPR.fi D.OIST)
PHOENIX
CITY OF TUCSON
TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY
WINSLOW
YUMA
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAIL IMG i
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEJ
STATE TUTAL 6
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
A6S
0.05$
l.OS
0.01$
250.*
0.05$
I.*
0.2$
00.
5*
<0.010
<0.0L0
0207.
<0.010
<0.050
001.0
<0.050?
0. 003
0114.
0.002
<0.020
<0.010
000.2
<0.010
<0.010
0019.
<0.010
<0.050
000.8
<0.010
<0.010
0057.
<0.010
<0.050
000.3
0272.*
<0.010
000.2
0.001
0118.
0.010
0. 050
000.4
0.050
O.OIO
0272.
0.010
0.050
0.010
OOL.O
0.001
0.003
0019.
0.002
0.020
0.010
000.2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
4
6
6
5
1
6
0
IRON
00.3*
<00.06
00.00
<00.05
<00.05
<00.05
00.05
00.06
00.00
0
0
0
6
LEAD
0 .05 $
<0.050
0.012
<0.050
<0.050
0.001
0.050
0.001
0
0
0
5
CALIFORNIA
ANT IOCH
AVILA BEACHCSAN LUIS OB. CO SERV.AREA )
BAKERSFIFLOICALIF. WATER SERVICE CO.)
BARSTOW(SOUTHERN CALIF. HATER CO.)
BENIC I A
8UR0ANK WATER DEPARTMENT!WELL SUPPLY)
BURBANK WATER DEPT.(CALIF. STATE PRGJ .)
BUB LING AMS WATER DEPARTMENT
CONCORDICONT*A COSTA COUNTYS WATER 01 S)
EAST LOS ANGELES(UNION PACIFIC RR)
EL CENTRO
CTTY OF EL ScGUNDO(COLORAOO RIVER)
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO(WELL #13)
CITY OF EL SEGUNOO(MWD N. CALIF. WATER)
EUREKA
FAIRFIELD
CITY OF FORT BPAGG(MA DSEN HOLE NOYO RI)
CITY OF FORT BRAGGINEWMAN GULCH)
FRESNO
CONG BEACHIGROUNO WATER SUPPLY)
LONG BEACH1 COLORADO RIVER)
0.001 0.000
0.010 0.000
<0.010 <0.100
0.001 <0.200
0.001
0.002
<0.500
<0.500
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001 0.750
<0.010 <0.100 <0.010
<0.100
<0.020? <0.100
<0.010
<0.010
<0.020?
<0.020?
0.009 0.000 0.001
<0.010 <0.100 <0.001
0070.
0026.
00L2.
0053.
0042.
0056.
0001.
0018.
0195.
0097.
0153.
0002.
oooa.
0009.
0022.
0013.
0029.
0056.
0.007
0.000
<0.002
<0.002
<0.005
<0.001
0.023
<0.003
0.010
<0.050
<0.050
<0.002
<0.002
0.014
0.000
<0.002
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.003
0.005
0.010
0.000
0.030
<0.030
0.010
001.1
000.3
000.2
0.000 000.8
<0.002 000.3
<0.010 001.0
001. 1
<0.006
<0.006
<0.060?
0.005
<0.005
0.000
<0.002
000.4
000.4
000.5
000.2
000.8
000.3
<000.3
000.2
001.0
000.3
<00.02
00.04
00.00 0.000
00.02
<00.01
<00.02
00.04
00.05
00.03
<00.05
<00.01
00.13
<00.02
00.01
<00.01
<0.004
0.010
<0.010
0.025
<0.001
00.12 0.019
00.02 <0.010
00.15
<0.010
00.42* <0.020
00.21 0.020
00.08 <0.010
00.16
00.00
<00.01
<00.02
<0.010
0.000
<0.001
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
HATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 73
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES fOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
T OS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002$
45. *
0.7$
3.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.*
ARIZONA
<0.080?
<0.005?
003.0
<0.010
<0.010
0168.
0333.*
<0.068
180.5
0417.
07.98
0806.*
0445700150000
001.7
<0.010
0.001
0072.
0053.
0.010
112.0
0154.
07.70
0406.
0463640150000
<0.050
<0.005?
009.0
<0.010
<0.010
0047.
0114.
<0.050
176.0
0232.
07.70
0358.
0488800150000
<0.050
<0.005?
004.0
<0.010
<0.010
0043.
0094.
0.100
144.0
02 50.
08.10
0390.
0488800199700
<001.0
0174.
0115.
0344.
07.60
0770.*
0495830150000
0.0.50
0.001
001.0
0.010
0128.
0310.*
0.050
0396.
08.20
0498420150000
0.080
0.005
009.0
0.010
0.010
0174.
0333.
0. 100
180.5
0417.
08.20
0806.
MAXIMUM
0.050
0.001
001.0
0.010
0.001
0043.
0053.
0.010
112.0
0154.
07.60
0358.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING t
I
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
4
4
6
0
5
4
6
6
5
4
6
6
5
NO. ANALYZED
6
STATE TOTAL
CALIFORNIA
<0.010
005.5
0086.
0174.
0.040
052.0
0153.
07.70
0428.
0602580150000
0.020
000.3
0024.
0099.
294.0
0325.
08.23
0604320150000
0.000
0.000
001.0
0.001
0018.
0013.
0.010
080.0
0088.
07.40
0146.
0604630150000
0605160150000
<0.020
<0.001
0014.
0074.
<0.020
191.0
0156.
07.30
0180.
0606240150000
0.000
0.001
036. 5
0.000
0.000
0035.
0088.
0.010
229.0
0353.
07.00
0444.
0610260150000
0.003
<0.001
000.8
<0.004
<0.001
0049.
0095.
0.020
104.0
0173.
08.36
0335.
0610260150001
O.OiO
0.002
000. 1
0.049
0.001
0003.
0001.
0.010
JO 14. 0
00 U.
09.40
0017.
0610320150000
<0.001
<0.001
0018.
0030.
0.002
045.0
0064.
08.10
0300.
0617520150000
0623480150000
0.019
0.0
001.0
0.002
0230.
0379.*
O.OU
185.0
0220.
07.90
0623880150000
<0.010
0.000
000.7
0.100
<0.010
<0.001
0111.
0315.*
0.020
121.0
0342.
08.10
0728.*
0624600150000
0.050
002.3
0064.
0060.
265.0
0310.
07.50
0723.*
0624600150001
<0.010
<0.001
<0.005
0.000
0624600150002
<0.050
0.001
000.0
<0.002
<0.010
0012.
0012.
<0.100
08 5.5
0089.
07.50
0127.
0625620150000
000.9
0009.
0020.
007.0
0149.
08.50
0625800150000
0.011
<0.001
000.0
<0.010
0008.
0007.
058.0
0034.
07.15
0100.
0628080150000
0.000
<0.001
000.0
<0.010
0012.
<0003.
018.0
0020.
07.16
0084.
0628080150001
0.000
023.5
0035.
0016.
155.0
0140.
07.60
0278.
0628860150000
0.000
<0.001
000. I
0.000
0.001
0059.
0019.
<0.020
132.0
0065.
08.24
0235.
0644820150000
0. 003
<0.000
000.8
<0.004
<0.000
0049.
0095.
0.020
104.0
0173.
08.36
0335.
0644820150001
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER TH$N THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
LOCATION
CALI FOR NIA
LOS ANGELES DEPT OF WATER AND PO(OWENS»
LOS ANGELES OEPT OF WATER AND PO(L.A. )
LOS ANGELES DEPT OF WATEF AND POiMWD 01
MCK INl.EYVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICES
MARTINEZ
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY*SAMPLE CLYD)
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY(CLYDE WELL )
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY(CLYDE WELL »
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY!CLYDE WELL )
MIL L BRA E
CITY OF MODESTO
MONTEREY(CALIF.-AMERICAN WATER CO.(
NEEDLES(A.T. & SANTA FE P.R.J
OAKLAND { E AST BAY M.U.D.)
ONTARIO
CITY OF PITTSBURG
CITY OF PORT HUENEMEIWELL 5A}
CITY OF PORT HUENEMEfWELL 6A)
CITY OF PORT HUENEMEISTROUBE STREET ST»
CITY OF REDDING '
REDDING AIRPORT WATER SUPPLY
REDWOOD CITY
ROSEVILLE
SACRAMENTO!SCARAMENTO CITY)
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIRPORT
SALINASCCALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPA)
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN OIEGO
SAN FRANCISCO
SAN JOSE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SANTA BAR3ARA CITY WATER OEPARTM(CATER)
SANTA BARBARA CITY WATER DEPARTM
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.002*
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.*
CALIFORNIA
<0.01.0
0.000
000.8
0.044
<0.010
0.000
0035.
0027.
0.020
117.0
0087.
08.34
0211.
0645300150000
<0.020
0.000
006.2
0.023
<0.010
0050.
0109.
0.001
146.0
0205.
07.78
0395.
0645300150001
<0.010
0.000
001.7
0.077
<0.010
0.000
0222.
0325.*
0.020
126.0
0124.
08.07
0787.*
0645300150002
<0.050
0.001
000.0
<0.002
<0.010
0012.
0012.
<0.100
085.5
0089.
07.50
0127.
0646550150000
0.013
<0.001
<000.1
0091.
0075.
0.011
073.0
0143.
08.00
0405.
0647820150000
0.010
016.0
<0.010
<0.010
0095.
0056.
0.020
260.0
0348.
07.70
0583.*
064 7820199800
0.010
00028
<0.010
0.010
0085.
0056.
0.020
200.0
0700.
07.80
0382.
0647820199801
0.010
001.4
<0.010
0.010
0120.
0052.
0.020
210.0
0168.
08.00
0488.
0647820199802
0.010
006.0
<0.010
0.010
0075.
0050.
0.020
170.0
0256.
07.90
0436.
064 7820199803
0.010
0.002
<000.1
0.049
0.001
0003.
0001.
0.010
014.0
0011.
09.40
0017.
0649380150000
0.010
<0.005?
021.6
<0.005
0049.
0017.
0.010
211.0
0171.
07.90
0376.
0650340150000
0.000
000.0
0016.
0051.
0128.
07.70
0208.
0651060150000
<0.005
0653160150000
<0.001
<000.1
<0.002
<0.005
0002.
0002.
0.010
019.0
0019.
09.40
0036.
0655080150000
0119.
0656520150000
0.036
<0.001
006.2
0.041
080.0
0135.
07.70
0395.
0660840150000
<0.050
012.0
0095.
0400.*
215.0
0518.
07.20
1000.*
0662100150000
0.100*
000.0
0088.
0374.*
201.0
0454.
07.10
0905.*
0662100150001
000.0
0099.
0418.*
22'- . 0
0562.
07.10
0915.*
0662100150002
<0.001
000.1
0.000
0005.
0020.
<0.006
045.8
0048.
06.90
0081.
0663540150000
o.ooa
0.001
007.0
<0.005
0.000
0008.
<0025.
0.500
069.0
0072.
07.30
0134.
0663540199700
0.010
0.002
000.1
0.049
0.001
0003.
0001.
0.010
014.0
0011.
09.40
0017.
0663780150000
<0.050
<0.002
000.0
0003.
0006.
<0.020
025.0
0032.
06.50
0072.
0666240150000
<0.050
000.3
0004.
0013.
030.0
0045.
08.60
0666780150000
0.000
0.000
0666780199700
002.7
0.000
0070.
0090.
0.040
200.0
0350.
07.45
0650.*
0667020150000
0.000
<0.001
001.1
0667440150000
<0.002
0112.
0290.*
<0.002
122.0
0323.
08.20
0737.*
066 768015000ft
<0.010
<0.001
000.3
<0.010
<0.010
0007.
0009.
0.020
046.5
0054.
08.00
0120.
0667860150000
0.000
0.000
010.0
0.006
0030.
0025.
<0.050
200.0
0200.
07.50
0450.
0668340150000
0.005
0.000
<001.0
0025.
0095.
101.0
0145.
07.35
0668700150000
0.000
<004.5
0.004
0054.
0240.
0.026
140.0
0340.
07.60
0550.*
0669420150000
0.000
<0.000
<001.3
0.002
0053.
0320.*
0.020
180.0
0450.
07.80
0680.*
0669420150001
0.210*
0.000
001.0
0.004
0099.
0001.
0.060
142.0
0060.
07.60
0367.
0675240150000
0.020
021.0
0.000
<0.010
0086.
0105.
136.0
0240.
08.00
0549.*
0678840150000
0.300*
<000.1
<0.010
0038.
0006.
<0.020
178.0
0162.
07.70
0450.
0683880150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 76
-------
RUN JATE 04-0L-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CAOMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ l.OS 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ I.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
CAL IFORNIA
MAXIMUM
0.030
0.750
0.020
0195.
0.050
0. 150
0.060
001.1
00. 16
01.20
0.040
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
o.ooo
0.000
0.000
000.1
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
2
0
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
36
33
37
50
37
38
27
48
23
49
39
STATE TOTAL 57
HAWAI I
DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY MlLO
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER wATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. * 0.7$ 0.01$ 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
CALIFORNIA
0.300 0.005 036.5 0.100 0.010 0.010 0230. 0418. 0.500 294.0 0700. 09.40 1000. MAXIMUM
0.000 0.000 000.0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0002. 0001. 0.000 007.0 0011. 06.90 0017. MINIMUM
3 0000 008000 0 12 NO. FAILING *
0 0000 000000 00 NO. FAILING $
0 1000 000000 00 NO.FAILING ?
49 33 49 8 30 21 50 49 38 49 50 50 45 NO. ANALYZED
57 STATE TOTAL
HAWAII
<0.030
000.6
<0.001
<0.010
0005.
<0.010
021.0
0020.
0080.
1519000150000
<0.030
000.2
<0.001
<0.010
0002.
0.010
011.0
0010.
0050.
1519000150001
<0.030
000. 4
<0.001
<0.010
0002.
0.020
018.0
0010.
0040.
1519000150002
<0.030
000.7
<0.001
<0.010
0003.
0.250
016. 0
0014.
0040.
1519000150003
<0.020
001.5
<0.010
0041.
0013.
053.0
0090.
07.95
0270.
1524000150000
<0.030
000.2
<0.001
<0.010
0008.
0.020
048.0
0030.
0086.
1529100150000
<0.030
000.2
<0.001
<0.010
0009.
0.040
031.0
0004.
0086.
1529100150001
<0.030
001.6
<0.010
<0.010
0009.
0004.
<0.010
060.0
0074.
0158.
1562000150000
0.030
001.6
0.010
0.010
0041.
0013.
0.250
060. 0
0090.
07.95
0270.
MAXIMUM
0.020
000. 2
0.001
0.010
0002.
0004.
0.010
011.0
0004.
07.95
0040.
MINIMUM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
8
0
8
0
8
7
a
2
7
8
8
1
8
NO. ANALYZED
8
STATE TOTAL
NEVADA
002.5
003.3
000. 1
0017.
0092.
0030.
0050.
0294.*
0024.
168.0 0176.
132.0' 0343.
024.0 0082.
07.84
07.89
07.40
0322.
0742.*
0119.
3212000150000
3246810150000
3272800150000
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANOAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
7 INDICATES A- POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
LOCATION ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON L^A0
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* o.05$ 1.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3» 0.05*
NEVADA
MAXI*UM
MINIMUM
NQ. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL
0.005
0.000
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0091.
0004.
0
0
0
3
0.070
0.030
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
000.3
000.1
0
0
0
3
00.00
00.00
0
0
0
2
00.03
00.00
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
GUAM
AGANA(COMMUNICATIONS/WATER 6 SEWERAGE)
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0.010 0015.
0.010
0.010
0
0
0
1
0015.
0015.
0
0
0
1
0.02 0
0.020
0.020
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
000.8
000.8
000.8
0
0
0
1
00.05 0.000
00.05
00.05
0
0
0
1
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
1
MARSHALL ISLAN
KWAJALE IN MISSILE RANGE
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 1
0
0
0
0
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
7 INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN OATE 04—01—75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALrSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.002$ 45. # 0.7$ O.Olt 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
NEVADA
003.3 0092. 0294. 168.0 0343. 07.89 0742. MAXIMUM
000.I 0017. 0024. 024.0 0082. 07.40 01L9. MINIMUM
0 0 000 00 1000 01 NO. FAILING *
0 0000 000000 00 NO. FAILING $
0 0000 000000 00 NO.FAILING ?
0 0 300 03 3033 33 NO. ANALYZED
3 STATE TOTAL
GUAM
0.003$ 002.3 0.010 0.020 0011. 0013. 0.006 082.2 0124. 07.41 0103. 6605000150000
0.003 002.3 0.010 0.020 0011. 0013. 0.006 082.2 0124. 07.41 0103. MAXIMUM
0.003 002.3 0.010 0.020 0011. 0013. 0.006 082.2 0124. 07.41 0103. MINIMUM
0 0000 000000 00 NO. FAILING *
0 1 0 00 00 0000 00 NO. FAILING $
0 0 0 0 0 000000 00 NO.FAILING ?
0 110 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I NO. ANALYZED
1 STATE TOTAL
MARSHALL ISLAN
7008451150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
0 0000 000000 00 NO. FAILING *
0 0 0 00 00 0000 00 NO. FAILING $
0 0000 000000 00 NO.FAILING 7
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 NO. ANALYZED
1 STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE OR INK ING WATER STANOAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE ORINKING WATER STANDAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE ORINKING HATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OP CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
A6S
IRON
LEAD
0.05$
1.0$
O.OU
253.*
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
o
o
•
\X)
*
00.3*
0.05S
MAXIMUM
0.050
0.750
0.020
0272.
0.050
0. 150
0. 06 0
001. 1
00. 16
01.20
0.050
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0001.
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.1
00.00
00.00
0. 000
NO. FAILING *
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
5
0
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYiEO
52
40
49
68
52
54
29
66
25
67
53
REGION TOTAL
76
NOTES * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
» INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 81
-------
RUN DATE 04-0 L-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 09
MANGANESE
0.05*
MERCURY
0.002$
NITRATE
45. *
CCE
0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250. »
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL
HARDNESS PH
TDS
500.«
10 NO.
0.300
0.005
036.5
0.100
0.010
0.020
0230.
0418.
0.500
294.0
0700.
09.40
1000.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
0001.
0.000
007.0
0004.
06.90
0017.
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
15
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
38
66
e
44
33
68
61
51
65
68
61
62
MAX I MUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
76 REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 10
LOCATION AKS6NIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHLORIDE CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE ABS IRON LEAD
0.05$ 1.0$ 0.01$ 250.* 0.05$ X.* 0.2$ 00.5* 00.3* 0.05$
ALASKA
ADAK U.S. NAVAL STATION
0.000
0.000
0.001
0011.
0.000
0.001
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
CITY ("IF ANCHORAGE (SHIP CREEK)
<0.005
0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
000. 1
<00.25
00. 10
0.000
ANCHORAGE(INT«L AIRPORT)
<0.005
0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.010
<0.020?
000.5
<00.25
00.05
00.00
COLD BAY FAA
0.000
0.000
0.000
0018.
0.000
0. 100
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.02
0.000
FAIRBANKS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES WA
<0.005
<0.200
0.001
<0010.
0.000
0. 100
<0.020?
000.9
<00.25
00.28
0.000
FAIRBANKS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
0.004
0.300
0.001
0002.
0.000
0.012
000.3
01.30*
0.000
JUNEAU CITY WATER CITY
<0.005
0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.008
<0.02 0?
000.4
<00.25
<00.01
0.000
JUNEAU MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
0.000
0.200
0.000
0009.
0.000
0.019
<0.02 0?
000.2
01. 10*
0.006
KETCHIKAN PUBLIC UTILITItS
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0. 780
<000.1
<00.25
00.0 8
0.020
KETCHIKAN PULP CO.
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.008
<0.02 0?
<000.1
<00.25
00.05
0. 000
KODIAK
0012.
000.2
00.29
SKAGWAY CITY SUPPLY
0007.
000.6
00.00
00.00
VALDEZ
0008.
0.200
000.3
00.00
MAXIMUM
0.005
0.300
0.001
0018.
0.000
0.780
0.020
000.9
00.25
01.30
0.020
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
0002.
o.ooo
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
NO. FAILING t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
10
10
10
13
10
11
7
13
9
13
10
STATE TOTAL 13
IDAHO
BOISE WATER CORPORATION
IDAHO FALLS
LEWISTON ORCHARDS IRRIGATION DIS
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
STATE TOTAL 3
<0.010
0.002
0.010
0.010
0.002
0
0
0
3
<0.100
0.150
0.100
0.150
0.100
0
0
0
3
<0.001
0.002
0.013
0.013
0.001
0
0
0
3
0012.
0016.
0016.
0012.
0
0
0
2
<0.010
0.004
0.010
0.010
0.004
0
0
0
3
<0.001
0.004
0.001
0.004
0.001
0
0
0
3
0.010
0.010
0.010
0
0
0
L
000.8
000.0
000.8
000.0
0
0
0
2
<00.10
00.02
00.10
00.02
0
0
0
2
00.11
00.03
00.03
00. 11
00.03
<0.010
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.010
0
0
0
3
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 10
MANGANESE MERCURY
0.05* 0.002$
NITRATE CCE
45. * 0.7$
SELENIUM
0.01$
SILVER
0.05$
SODIUM
SULFATE
250. *
ZINC
5.*
ALKAL
HARDNESS PH
TDS
500. *
10 NO.
ALASKA
0.000
000. 1
0.001
0.000
0006.
0002.
0.000
013.0
0015.
07.70
0036.
0200380150000
0.000
0.000
<025.0
<0.005
0.000
<0001.
<0025.
0.080
040. 0
00 52.
07.70
0076.
0203120150000
0.016
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0003.
<0025.
0.260
07.90
0135.
0203120150001
0.000
003.6
0.000
0.000
0018.
0000.
0.100
085. 0
0070.
08.40
0142.
0218050150000
0.008
0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0006.
0034.
0.004
078.0
0118.
07.70
0205.
0227690150000
I.000*
000.0
0.003
0.000
0005.
0011.
0.040
158.0
0160.
07.20
0206.
022 7690199700
0.003
0.000
002.0
<0.005
0.000
<0002.
0031.
0.024
07.60
0101.
0241730150000
1. 100*
0.000
000.2
0.000
0.000
0006.
0011.
0.060
0089.
0090.
07.20
0121.
0241730199700
0.000
0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0001.
<002 5.
0.049
05.20
0027.
0245630150000
0.010
0.000
<001.0
<0.005
0.000
0001.
<0025.
0.040
05.00
0015.
0245630199800
0.020
003.7
0006.
0003.
020.0
0030.
08.30
0056.
0249140150000
054.0
0052.
08.20
0066.
0281140150000
0. 040
002.0
0010.
059.0
00 76.
07.80
0088.
0293600150000
I. 100
0.000
025.0
0.005
0.000
0018.
0034.
0.260
158.0
0160.
08.40
0206.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.000
013.0
0015.
05.00
0015.
MINIMUM
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
12
7
12
0
10
10
11
12
10
9
9
13
13
NO. ANALYZED
13
STATE TOTAL
IDAHO
<0.010
0.000
004.0
<0.001
0029.
006 L .
0.009
0264.
0.010
0.002
007.1
0.002
0.002
0017.
0035.
0.035
244.0
0264.
07.50
0360.
0.020
0.001
0.001
0003.
0030.
0.001
000.0
07.50
0.020
0.002
007.1
0.002
0.002
0029.
0061.
0.035
244.0
0264.
07.50
0360.
0.010
0.000
004.0
0.002
0.001
0003.
0030.
0.001
000.0
0264.
07.50
0264.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
2
0
1
3
3
3
3
2
1
2
2
1609250150000
1645000150000
1653260150000
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING $
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
3 STATE TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
RUN PATE J4-0 1-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CAR-RIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NU. 10
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
ABS
IRON
0. 05$
l.OS
0.01$
250.*
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
00.5*
00.3*
OREGON
CITY OF ASTOR I A
0.005
0.010
0.001
0008.
0.002
0.007
<0.010
000.9
<00.02
00.39*
CITY OF BEND(CITY WELL)
<0.005
<0.030
0.000
0013.
0.000
0.012
0.02 0*
000.1
<00.25
00.08
COOS BAY - NORTH BEND WATER SOAK
0.005
<0.050
0.005
0029.
<0.100?
<0.100
<0.050?
000.9
<00.10
00.03
cUGENE
0.005
<0.050
<0.005
0004.
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050?
<000.2
<00.10
<00.03
FLORENCE
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
0016.
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050?
000.7
<00.10
00.03
KLAMATH FALLS(ORFGON WATFP CORPORATION)
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
0005.
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050?
000.2
<00.10
00.03
MEDFORD
<0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0002.
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050?
000.2
<00.10
<00.03
NEWPORT
0.005
0.050
0.000
0019.
0.000
0.024
0.020*
001.0
00.25
00.05
PORTLAND
0.005
<0.050
<0.005
<0003.
<0.050
<0.100
<0.050?
000.1
<00.10
00.03
RAINIER
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
<0.020?
000.2
00.25
00.05
MAXIMUM
0.005
3.050
0.005
0029.
0. 100
0. 100
0.050
001.0
00.25
00.39
MINIMUM
0.005
0.010
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.000
0.010
000.1
00.02
00.03
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
0
0
MO. ANALYZED
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
STATE TOTAL 10
WASHINGTON
CITY OF ABERDEEN WATER DfcPASTMEN
O.OOL
0.010
O.002
0004.
0.001
0.034
0.010
000.1
00.10
ANACORTES WATER DEPARTMENT
0.002
<0.0 10
0.001
0002.
<0.003
<0.002
<0.010
<000.1
<00.02
00.02
ANACORTEStSHELL OIL COMPANY REFINERY)
00.03
SELL INGHAM WATER DEPARTMENT
0.002
<0.050
0.000
0005.
0.000
0. 000
<0.010
000.2
<00.02
EDMONDS WATER DEPARTMENT
<0.002
0.001
<0.002
0.040
00.17
EOMONDS(OLY MP IC VIEW WATER DISTRICT NO)
•
00.26
EVERETT WATER DEPARTMENT
0.008
<0.010
<0.001
0003.
0.001
0.012
<0.010
000.1
00.02
FERNDALEIATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.)
<0.002
<0.010
<0.020
<00.03
00.50*
CITY OF LJNGVIEW
0.006
<0.010
<0.001
0006.
<0.002
0.008
<0.010
001.0
<00.02
00.10
LONGVIEWIWEYERHAEUSER COMPANY)
0.002
0.025
0.002
0011.
0.045
<0.010
000.3
<00.02
00.26
LONGVIEWIREYNOLOS METALS COMPANY)
0.010
0.060
<0.002
0020.
0.001
0.005
<0.010
000.3
00.02
00.43*
OLVMPIA
000.1
00.07
PASCO
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
0.000
0.004
<0.020?
000.2
<00.25
00.01
PORT ANGELES
<0.005
<0.050
<0.001
<0010.
0.000
0.011
<0.020?
000.1
<00.25
00.75*
RAYMOND
<0.005
<0.050
0.000
<0010.
0.000
0.019
<0.020?
001.1
00.13
SEATTLE
0.000
0.000
0.009
0002.
<0.005
0.010
0.000
001.0
<00.02
00.05
SEATTLE(SOUTH FORK TOLT RIVER)
0. 000
0002.
<0.005
0.010
001.0
<00.02
00.32
LEAD
0.09$
0.010
0.000
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
0.000
<0.010
0.000
0.010
0. 000
0
0
0
10
0.018
<0.002
0.000
<0. 005
0.005
<0.050
0.015
<0.005
<0. 005
0.000
0.000
0.000
<0.005
<0.005
NOTE: » INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
i INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES a POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING HATER STANDAROS LIMIT
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 10
MANGANESE MERCURY NITRATE CCE SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM SULFATE ZINC ALKAL HARDNESS PH TDS ID NO.
0.05* 0.0021 45. * 0.7$ O.Olt 0.05$ 250.* 5.* 500.*
OREGON
0.008
0.003$
000.3
0. 100
<0.002
<0.001
0008.
0003.
0.017
006. 0
0016.
06.50
0060.
4104160150000
0.003
0.000
<003.0
<0.005
0.000
0009.
<0025.
0.024
07.40
0107.
4107360150000
<0.030
0.001
000.4
<0.005
<0.200?
0038.
<0001.
<0. 100
111. 0
0070.
07.70
0214.
4118090 150000
<0.030
<0.001
000. t
0.100
<0.005
<0.020
0003.
0003.
<0.100
019.0
0021.
07.00
0070.
4128480150000
0.030
<0.001
000.0
>0.100
<0.005
<0.020
0027.
<0001.
<0.100
06 0.0
0023.
07.20
0128.
4129600150000
<0.030
<0.001
000.2
<0.005
<0.020
0022.
0002.
<0. 100
090.0
0046.
07.80
0151.
4145760150000
<0.0.30
<0.001
000. 1
<0.005
<0.020
0004.
0000.
<0.100
044.0
0034.
07.30
0099.
4154080150000
0.059*
0.001
001.0
0.005
0.000
0011.
002 5.
0. 170
07.30
0108.
4160960150000
0.030
<0.001
001. 8
<0.100
<0.005
<0.200?
0001.
<0001.
<0. 100
005.0
0007.
06.60
4167840150000
0.000
<0.005?
001.0
0.100
<0.005
0.000
0005.
002 5.
0.560
07.30
4169760150000
0.059
0.005
003.0
0. 100
0.005
0.200
0038.
0025.
0.560
111.0
0070.
07.80
0214.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.100
0.002
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.017
005.0
0007.
06.50
0060.
MINIMUM
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
10
7
7
10
8
NO. ANALYZED
10 STATE TOTAL
WASHINGTON
0.004
0.000
000.2
0.002
0.001
0003.
0001.
0.034
017.0
0020.
06.20
5300280150000
<0.001
0.001
000. 1
0.100
<0.002
<0.001
0002.
0006.
0.025
06.90
0052.
5303640150000
5303640199800
0.006
0.000
000.2
<0.005
0.000
0003.
0016.
0.015
050.0
0100.
07.15
<0086.
5306160150090
0.005
<0.001
0.720
5325060150000
5325060151000
0.007
0.001
0.003$
000.1
000. 1
0.200
<0.100
<0.002
<0.001
0.010
0001.
0011.
0002.
0.018
0.380
058.0
0016.
07.30
<0047.
532 7720150000
5328840199800
0. 100*
0.002
000.3
<0.001
0004.
0013.
0.097
054.0
0068.
07.60
0207.
5346 760150000
0.003
0.001
000.2
<0.001
0008.
0017.
0.015
054.0
0060.
07.90
0099.
5346760199800
0.210*
0.001
000. 1
0.001
0018.
0000.
0.050
194.0
0184.
07.40
0245.
5346760199810
0.003
0008.
0018.
058.0
0084.
07.30
0130.
5361460150000
0.000
0.000
001.0
0.300
<0.005
0.000
0007.
0025.
0.031
062.0
0098.
007.5
0133.
5365240150000
0.020
0.000
<001.0
<0.100
<0.005
<0.001
0002.
002 5.
0.077*
060.0
0080.
07.20
0051 .
5366920150000
0.00 7
0.001
002.0
<0.005
0.000
0004.
<0025.
0. 190
06.80
0050.
5370140150000
<0.050
0.000
000.0
<0.100
0.000
0.000
0001.
0001.
<0.150
020.4
0024.
07.60
0028.
5376160150000
<0.050
<0.100
<0.150
005.3
0009.
06.70
5376160150001
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDAROS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 86
-------
RUN DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 10
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANI DE
FLUORIDE
ABS
IRON
LEAD
0.05*
1.0»
0.01$
250. *
0.05$
l.»
0.2*
00.5*
o
o
•
W
*
0.05*
WASHINGTON
CITY OF SPOKANE
0.002
0.120
0.002
0004.
0.002
0.006
000.0
00.01
0.005
SPOKANE COUNTY-CITY AIRPORT BOAR
0.002
0.06 0
0.002
0007.
0.002
0.002
000.4
00.02
0.005
TACOMA
0.002
<0.100
0.000
0002.
0.000
0.000
0.000
<000.1
00.00
0.016
CITY'OF VANCOUVER
<0.010
<0.010
<0.001
0005.
0.002
0.020
<0.010
<00.03
00.22
<0.001
PORT OF VANCOUVER
0007.
000.1
00.10
MAX I MUM
0.010
0.120
0.010
0020.
0.020
0.045
0.020
001.1
00.25
00.75
0.050
MINIMUM
OtOOO
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.02
00.00
0.000
NO. FAILING *
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
NO. FAILING $
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
NO. ANALYZED
17
15
18
17
16
17
13
17
12
20
18
STATE TOTAL 22
MAX JMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZED
REGION TOTAL
0.010
0.000
0
0
0
40
0.300
0.000
0
0
0
38
0.013
0.000
0
0
0
41
0029.
0.000
0
0
0
41
0.100
0.000
0
0
1
39
0.780
0.000
0
0
0
41
0.050
0.000
2
0
16
31
001.1
000.0
0
0
0
42
00.25
00.00
0
0
0
33
01.30
00.00
6
0
0
46
0.050
0.000
0
0
0
41
48
NOTE: * 1 >\I0I CATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING
$ INOICATES VALUE FAILING THE LINKING
? INOICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE
WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
WATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER
PAGE 87
-------
RON DATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
REGION NO. 10
4ANGANESE
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
ALKAL
HARDNESS
PH
TDS
0.05*
0.002*
45. *
0.7$
0.01$
0.05$
250.*
5.*
500.'
0.000
0.001
006.1
0.004
0.001
0003.
0014.
0.110
146.0
0144.
07.85
0.002
0.001
001.8
0.003
0.001
0009.
0014.
0.010
148.0
0112.
08.00
0257.
0.001
0.000
000. 1
<0.100
0.001
0.000
0003.
0001.
020.0
0020.
07.20
0046.
0.012
<0.001
003.6
0.002
0.001
0005.
0020.
0.040
0.020
0023.
087.0
0106.
07.00
0160.
0.210
0.003
006. 1
0.300
0.005
0.010
0018.
0025.
0.720
194.0
0184.
08.00
0257.
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.100
0.000
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.010
005.3
0009.
06.20
0028.
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
16
16
8
12
17
17
17
17
15
15
17
14
22
ID NO.
WASHINGTON
5380500150000
5360500199700
53S3300150000
5389200150000
538 8200199 600
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
NO. FAILING *
NO. FAILING *
NO.FAILING ?
NO. ANALYZEO
STATE TOTAL
1.100
o.oo5
025.0
0.300
0.005
0.200
0038.
0061.
0.720
244.0
0264.
08.40
0360 .
MAX I MUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0. 100
0.000
0.000
0001.
0000.
0.000
000.0
0007.
05.00
0015.
MINIMUM
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING *
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
44
36
40
13
33
40
41
42
40
33
32
42
37
48
NO. ANALYZED
REGION TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING MATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
$ INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING HATER STANDAROS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
-------
a UN HAT t 04-01-75 RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
interstate: carrier water SUPPLIES
LOCATION
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CADMIUM
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM
COPPER
CYANI DE
FLUURIDE
ABS
IRON
LEAD
0. 05*
1.0$
0.011.
250. *
0.05$
1.*
0.2$
00.5*
*
m
•
o
o
0.05$
MAXIMUM
0. 060
0. 99H
0.030
066 5 •
0.100
o.7ao
0.260
002.5
00.80
04.80
0.220
MINIMUM
0.000
0.000
0.000
000 ).
0.000
0.000
0.000
000.0
00.00
00.00
0.000
NO. .FA U INC, «
5
0
0
11
0
0
21
0
1
59
0
NO. FAILING i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
NO.FAILING ?
22
0
7
0
2
0
109
0
0
U
1
NO. ANALYZED
566
502
5
-------
PUN OATE 04-01-75
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
INTERSTATE CARRIER WATER SUPPLIES
lANGANESfc
MERCURY
NITRATE
CCE
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
SULFATE
ZINC
alkal
HARDNESS
PH
TOS
ID NO.
0.05*
0.0021
45. *
0.7*
0.01$
0 .05$
250.*
5. *
500.*
1.100
0.500
036.5
1.500
0.015
0.200
0402.
0978.
4.000
550.0
4300.
10.60
2099.
MAXIMUM
0.000
0.000
000.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000.
0000.
0.000
000.0
0000.
05.00
0000.
MINIMUM
58
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
68
NO. FAILING *
0
13
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. FAILING $
6
38
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO.FAILING ?
669
512
640
83
4 IS
485
630
625
591
599
613
674
615
NO. ANALYZED
735
NATIONAL TOTAL
NOTE: * INDICATES VALUE f AIL INC. THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECOMMENDED LIMIT
t INDICATES VALUE FAILING THE DRINKING dATER STANDARDS MANDATORY LIMIT
? INDICATES A POSSIBLE FAILURE BECAUSE THE MINIMUM DFTEC T ABLE LIMIT IS HIGHER THAN THE DRINKING WATER STANDARDS LIMIT
PAGE 90
-------
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
DATE DUE
Regional Offices Phone
Boston, Massachusetts 02203 617-223-7210
New York, New York 10007 212-264-2525
Philadelphia, Pa. 19106
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Dallas, Texas 75202
215-597-9800
404-526-5727
312-353-5250
214-7494962
Kansas City, Missouri 64106 816-374-5493
Denver, Colorado 80203 303-837-3895
San Francisco, Calif. 94102 415-556-2320
States Covered
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico,
Virgin Islands
Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania,
Virginia, West Virginia, D.C.
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Texas
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada,
American Samoa, Guam, Trust Territories
of Pacific Islands, Wake Island
------- |