DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
CORNELIA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CORNELIA, GEORGIA
MARCH 20-24, 1995
KY
CORNELIA^
sc
MS
AL
GA
FL

Prepared By:	^
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Services Division
Air and Water Compliance Section
^ |— 960 College Station Road
||	Athens, Georgia 30605-2720	Region rv

-------
Table of Contents
Page
Section 1 - Introduction and Objectives		1
Section 2 - Summary of Findings	• 4
Section 3 - Recommendations		6
Section 4 - Plant Performance/Pretreatment/Upgrades		8
-	Plant Performance: March 1994 - February 1995		8
-	Pretreatment		8
-	Scheduled Improvements and Upgrades		11
Section 5 - EPA Sampling Results		13
-	Description of EPA Sampling Stations		13
-	Conventional Pollutants		13
-	Metals		17
Section 6 - Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes 		19
Preliminary Treatment		19
Primary Clarifiers		19
-	Trickling Filter		22
Intermediate Clarifier		24
Aeration Basin		24
Final Clarifiers		28
Disinfection/Post Aeration		29
Sludge Handling		31
References	 33

-------
Table of Contents (continued)
List	of Figures Page
1	Flow Diagram	 2
List	of Tables Page
4-1	Summary of Self-Monitoring Data - Conventional Pollutants	 9
5-1	EPA Sampling Stations	 14
5-2 EPA Analytical Results: Conventional Parameters	 15
5-3	EPA Analytical Results: Metals	 18
6-1	Primary Clarifier Operating Parameters	 21
6-2 Trickling Filter Operating Parameters	 23
6-3 Aeration Basin Operating Parameters	 26
6-4 EPA Process Control Test Results	 26
6-5 Final Clarifier Operating Parameters	 30
6-6 EPA Analytical Results: Sludge	 32
Appendices
A- EPA Sampling Methodologies
B- Plant Design Information
C- EPA DO/pH Profile of Aeration Basin
D- Complete Listing of EPA Analytical Results
E- List of Industrial Users

-------
- SECTION 1 -
Introduction
During March 20-24, 1995, representatives of the EPA, Region IV, Environmental
Services Division and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD)
conducted a Diagnostic Evaluation (DE) at the Cornelia Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) in Corrielia, Georgia. The DE was requested by the Water
Management Division and was conducted in support of the Municipal Water
Pollution Prevention (MWPP) Program. The WWTP had experienced performance
problems and was operating under a Consent Order which expired on July 31,
1995. The WWTP has been unable to achieve ammonia reductions and will be
required to meet effluent NH3-N limitations upon the expiration of the Consent
Order.
The 3.0 mgd (design) WWTP consists of screening/grit removal units, two
primary clarifiers, two trickling filters (one in operation), one intermediate
clarifier, two aeration basins (one in operation), two final clarifiers, one
chlorine contact chamber, and post aeration. Waste sludge is stabilized in
two anaerobic digesters and dewatered on 20 sand drying beds. Treated
wastewater is discharged through outfall 001 into the South Fork of Little Mud
Creek. A flow diagram of the WWTP is shown in Figure 1.
Objectives
The objectives of the DE were to:
Evaluate the overall operations of the WWTP including process control
testing, operating strategies, and all routine sampling and analyses.
Review past records of plant performance and historical plant data.
~ Characterize the influent, intermediate, and effluent wastewater
streams.
»¦ Conduct process control testing of the biological treatment process and
collect in-plant samples.
1

-------
Aerobic
digester
Influent
1 C-l
"l
FIGURE 1
FLOW DIAGRAM
CORNELIA WWTP
Bar
screen
Sludge
holding tank
""¦V C-DS
C-WAS #
Grit
channels
p-MMo/M
Primary
clarifiers
Sludge
drying
beds (10)
splitter
AAA
Belt
press
LEGEND
EPA Sampling Station #
Wastewater Flow —
Recycle/RAS Flow
Waste Sludge Flow -
Little Mud Creek
Aeration
basin
C-AB
•

Aeration
basin
(not in use)



d C-RAS
C-001 T
Final
clarifiers
Recirculation pumping station
(weekends)
Chlorine contact chamber
and post aeration
2 *

-------
,y

-------
Evaluate the organic and hydraulic loadings to unit processes and
compare the results with accepted design criteria.
»• Evaluate the facility's pretreatment program.
Participants in the study were:
Mike Bowden
EPA/ESD
706/546-2620
Antonio Quinones
EPA/ESD
706/S46-2620
Tim Simpson
EPA/ESD
706/546-2620
Mike Birch
EPA/ESD
706/546-2447
Bruce Henry
EPA/WD
404/347-3633
Jim Adcock
EPA/WD
404/347-3633
Richard Fox
EPD
404/656-4708
3

-------
- SECTION 2 -
Summary of Findings
1.	From March 1994 through February 1995, the effluent NH3-N concentrations
ranged from 18 to 42 mg/1. These concentrations far exceed the proposed
future monthly average NH3-N limit of 1.5 mg/1. The proposed NH3-N
limits will take effect upon the expiration of the Consent Order
(6/30/95). The city manager has filed for an extension of the Consent
Order.
2.	The City has contracted with Piedmont, Olsen, and Hensley, Inc., of
Atlanta to upgrade the existing facility to achieve ammonia reductions
to within the proposed permit limits and eventually remove phosphorus.
A detailed listing of the proposed upgrades is included in Section 4 of
this report.
3.	A summary of the WWTP self-monitoring data from March 1994 through
February 1995 indicated that the plant effluent was generally within
NPDES permit limits. Several permit excursions occurred during July
through September 1994 for BOD5, TSS, dissolved oxygen, and pH.
4.	The maximum average monthly flow during March 1994 through February 1995
was 2.33 mgd, which was approximately 78 percent of the 3 mgd design
flow. During the weekdays, the VJVJTP receives approximately 60 percent
industrial flow from 11 industrial users. The largest volume of flow
originates from Fieldale Farms, a poultry processing and rendering
facility. During the weekends, the influent wastewater originates from
primarily domestic sources.
5.	Fieldale Farms installed a new pretreatment system, consisting of ultra-
filtration (UF) units, which was scheduled to start up during the summer
of 1994. Due to numerous design problems, the start-up was continuously
delayed and the UF system has recently been abandoned. A conventional
dissolved air flotation (DAF) system will reportedly replace the UF
system with testing to begin by September of 1995.
6.	An overall summary of the EPA sampling results is as follows:
The final ef.fluent BODj and TSS concentrations were <4 and 5.5
mg/1, respectively, indicating good carbonaceous biological
4

-------
treatment. The plant effluent was within NPDES permit limits for
these parameters. The monthly and weekly average permit limits
are 30 and 45 mg/1, respectively, for both parameters.
The NH3-N concentration was reduced from 57 to 40 mg/1 through the
activated sludge process, indicating that very little
nitrification occurred.
» Twelve metals were detected in the final effluent, including three
priority pollutants: nickel {7 ug/1), zinc (56 ug/1), and mercury
(0.23 ug/1).
~ The BOD5, TSS, and NH3-N concentrations from Fieldale Farms were
320, 100, and 31 mg/1, respectively. The NH^-N concentration
originating from Ethicon, the second largest industrial user, was
significantly higher (130 mg/1, estimated). Ethicon discharges
approximately 0.13 mgd, which is less than 10 percent of the daily
flow to the WWTP.
7.	The BOD5 and TSS removals in the primary clarifiers of 22 and 31
percent, respectively, were less than the typical removals expected.
This may have been due to high surface overflow rates caused by
unmeasured flow splits to each clarifier and/or a high solids loading
due to the large volume of recycle flow which was pumped upstream of the
primary clarifiers. The recycled wastewater included the intermediate
and final clarifier waste sludge, the belt press filtrate, and the
filtrate from the sludge drying beds.
8.	The BODj removals through the trickling filter were higher than the
typical removals expected. Observations during the DE indicated a good,
healthy biological growth on the filter media, good flow distribution,
and no strong odors or filter ponding.
9.	The activated sludge system was operated with a high mean-cell-
residence-time (MCRT), a high detention time, and a slightly low food-
to-microorganism (F/M) ratio for combined trickling filter/activated
sludge systems. The measured F/M ratio of 0.47 was slightly less than
the recommended range of 0.5-1.2. However, the low F/M ratio did not
appear to adversely affect BOD5 removals. The MCRT of 8-13 days
exceeded the recommended range of 2-6 days. The detention time of 6.7
hours also exceeded the recommended detention time of 2-4 hours.
5

-------
- SECTION 3 -
Recommendations
1.	Flow equalization should be strongly considered so that flows and
subsequent loadings into the biological treatment process are consistent
at all times, particularly during weekends when Fieldale Farms is
closed.
2.	All industrial contributions should be carefully monitored. A reliable
pretreatment system for Fieldale Farms is imperative if adequate and
consistent biological treatment is expected at the City's WWTP.
3.	An evaluation of the overall operating parameters and EPA process
control tests indicates that for the current system, the operating staff
should consider gradually decreasing the MCRT, while carefully
increasing the aeration basin DO levels. For the aeration basin, the
minimum recommended DO levels for nitrification are between 2-3 mg/1.
The oxygen requirements should be evaluated and additional aeration
equipment may be necessary until the upgrades are complete.
4.	Once the MCRT is lowered in the activated sludge process, and the
aeration basin DO concentrations are increased to provide for
nitrification, the return sludge flow should be increased significantly
to prevent denitrification from occurring in the final clarifiers. The
return sludge flow should be maintained between 75-150 percent of plant
flow. Careful monitoring of the sludge blanket depths will also be
imperative.
5.	Once nitrification begins to occur, the alkalinity requirements should
be carefully monitored and the magnesium hydroxide feed rates adjusted
accordingly. The influent into the aeration basin should be sampled
regularly for alkalinity. Approximately 7.14 mg/1 of alkalinity is
required per 1 mg"/l of NH3-N removed.
6

-------
The facility should consider providing a means of measuring flow for the
following in-plant streams:
» Intermediate clarifier and final clarifier sludge recycles to the
primary clarifier.
Influent into each primary clarifier. This would provide a more
accurate means of directing the appropriate flow splits between
the primary clarifiers.
»¦	Recirculation to the trickling filters.
The WWTP staff should consider sampling the influent on the weekends to
determine the weekend wastewater characteristics.

-------
- SECTION 4 -
Plant Performance/Pretreatment/Upgrades
».	Plant Performance; March 1994 - February 199S
A summary of the WWTP self-monitoring data for the conventional parameters,
reported from March 1994 through February 1995, is shown in Table 4-1. The
overall data indicated that the plant effluent was generally within NPDES
permit limits for the conventional parameters. During this reporting period,
permit excursions occurred for BODj, TSS, DO, and pH as follows:
The monthly average BOD5 concentration during August 1994 of 36 mg/1
exceeded the permit limit of 30 mg/1 while the TSS concentration of 39
mg/1 exceeded the permit limit of 30 mg/1.
*¦	The minimum effluent DO concentrations during July, August, and
September were 5.8, 5.6, and 4.4 mg/1, respectively. These DO
concentrations were below the minimum permit limit of 6.0 mg/1.
»•	The minimum pH values during July and August 1994 of 3.8 and 3.6
standard units (SUs), respectively, were below the minimum permit limit
of 6.0 SUs.
The maximum of the average monthly flows during March 1994 through August
February 1995 was 2.33 mgd, which was approximately 78 percent of the 3 mgd
design flow. During the weekdays, the WWTP receives approximately 60 percent
industrial flow. During the weekends, the influent wastewater originates from
primarily domestic sources.
From March 1994 through February 1995, the effluent NH3-N concentrations
ranged from 18.2 to 41.9 mg/1. Partial NH3-N reductions occurred during June
through November 1994. During March, April, and May 1994 and February 1995
the NH3-N concentrations increased through the treatment process, indicating
that the influent organic nitrogen was possibly being converted to NH3-N in
the process.
The effluent NH3-N concentrations far exceeded the proposed future monthly
average NH3-N limit of 1.5 mg/1. The proposed limits will take effect upon
the expiration of the Consent Order (6/30/95). The city manager has filed for
an extension of the Consent Order.
8

-------
Table 4-1
Summary of Self-Monitoring Data
Cornelia WWTP
Cornelia, Georgia
Month
Influent
Flow
Influent
pH (SUs)
Effluent
pH (SUs)
Influent
(mg/1)
Effluent
(mg/1)
mgd
Min
Max
Min
Max
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
BOD
TSS
Ammonia
March 94
2.10
6.6
9.8
6.6
7.7
355
136
12.6
30
21
24.5
April
2.12
5.2
9.0
6.1
7.7
353
136
22.2
22
15
24.4
May
2.15
7.1
9.9
7.0
7.6
232
103
20.9
10
7
27.3
June
2.31
6.3
9.1
6.3
7.8
262
160
37.7
16
12
33 * 1
July
2.18
6.3
8.1
3.8
7.4
257
146
55.4
22
18
28.1
August
2.33
6.7
8.9
3.6
7.7
264
132
38.3
36
39
18.2
September
2.00
6.9
9.1
6.7
7.7
361
190
36.4
23
26
18.7
October
1.95
6.8
9.1
6.9
7.6
252
96
37.8
10
9
36.2
November
1. 79
6.9
9.0
6.0
7.5
280
130
40.2
9
10
32.8
December
1.82
7.1
12.7
6.6
8.0
356
135
42.4
11
9
41.9
January 95
1.99
6.8
10.1
6.3
7.4
395
99
37.7
9
6
35.6
February
2.09
6.9
9.5
6.2
7.7
322
117
25.5
9
8
39.7
Permit
Limits'
3.0/
3.8

6.0
9.0



30/
45
30/
45
1.5/
2.3
'Except for pH, permit limits are monthly/weekly averages. Flow and pH limits are from Consent
Order. NH3-N limitB are from the future permit and are not currently effective.
9

-------
Table 4-1 (continued)
Summary of Self-Monitoring Data
Cornelia WWTP
Cornelia, Georgia
Month
Effluent D.o.
(mg/1)
Effluent TRC
(mg/1)
Effluent Fecal Coliform
(Col/100 ml)

Minimum
Maximum

March 94
6.6
0.9
93.4
April
6.4
1.0
61.5
May
6.0
0.9
38.7
June
6.0
1.4
152.2
July
5.8
0.4
170.9
August
5.6
1.0
69.3
September
4.4
1.9
69.4
October
6.2
1.3
109.9
November
6.3
0.9
73.9
December
7.0
1.3
ro
•
January 95
6.4
0.8
19.8
February
7.9
1.2
22.8
Permit Limits
6.0
REPORT
200 monthly avg.
400 weekly avg.
10

-------
The average monthly BODs, TSS, and NH3-N influent concentrations are also
shown in Table 4-1. The average monthly influent BODj concentration ranged
from 232 to 395 mg/1 during the 12-month period. Domestic influent BOD5
concentrations from 220 to 400 mg/1 are generally considered to be of medium
to high strength'. The average monthly influent NH3-N concentration ranged
from 12.6 to 55.4 mg/1. Medium to high strength influent NH-j-N concentrations
range from 25-50 mg/11. The high strength concentrations for B0D5 and NH3-N
were attributed to the high percentage of industrial flow.
Pretreatment
During the weekdays, the WWTP receives approximately 60 percent industrial
flow from 11 industrial users. The largest volume of flow originates from
Fieldale Farms, a poultry processing and rendering facility. A list of the
industrial users is included in Appendix E. As part of the DE, the
pretreatment facility at Fieldale Farms was visited by EPA. The existing
treatment plant at Fieldale consisted of screening, grease removal, flow
equalization, and solids separation with four quadracell solids separators.
The solids from the quadracell units were hauled to the Habersham County
Landfill for final disposal, while the pretreated wastewater was discharged
into the city's collection system for further treatment.
A new pretreatment system, consisting of ultra-filtration (UF) units, was
scheduled to start up during the summer of 1994. Due to numerous design
problems, the start-up was continuously delayed and most recently, the UF
system has been abandoned. A conventional dissolved air flotation (DAF)
system will reportedly replace the UF system with testing to begin by
September of 1995. The city manager has filed for an extension of the
Consent Order until Fieldale begins operation of their replacement
pretreatment facility.
During the DE, grab samples were collected by EPA from the discharges from
Fieldale Farms and Ethicon. The results are included in Appendix D. The
B0Ds, TSS, and NH3-N concentrations from Fieldale were 320, 100, and 31 mg/1,
respectively. The NH3-N concentration originating from Ethicon was
significantly higher (130 mg/1, estimated). Ethicon discharges approximately
0.13 mgd, which is less 10 percent of the daily flow to the WWTP.
~ Scheduled Improvements and Upgrades
The city has contracted with Piedmont, Olsen, and Hensley, Inc., of Atlanta to
upgrade the existing facility to meet ammonia limits and eventually remove
11

-------
phosphorus. The proposed upgrades are summarized in a December 1994 "Design
Development Report"5 prepared by Piedmont, Olsen, and Hensley. The proposed
upgrades are as follows:
~	Addition of a new mechanical bar screen with 3/4-inch openings, upstream
of the existing manual bar screen.
~	Addition of an 18-inch Parshall flume downstream of the new mechanical
bar screen.
»¦	Intermediate and final clarifier sludge pumping directly to the
digesters, rather than upstream of the primary clarifiers.
~	Addition of baffles in the primary clarifiers to prevent short-
circuiting .
~	Removal of the existing trickling filter from the process train.
Conversion of the existing intermediate clarifier into a "pre-aeration"
basin.
~	Addition of a lime feed system to provide the alkalinity required for
nitrification.
Conversion of the existing two aeration basins into a total of six
treatment "cells." The concrete walls will be repaired and the
electrical power distribution system will be modified.
~	Addition of jet aeration equipment to provide the necessary oxygen to
the aeration basins.
»¦	Addition of new return sludge pumps to increase the pumping capacity
required for extended aeration systems.
Addition of new tertiary sand filters downstream of the recirculation
pumping station. The existing recirculation pumping station will feed
the new effluent tertiary sand filters.
Addition of two sand drying beds for sludge dewatering. One portable
belt filter press will be available on an as-needed basis to provide
supplemental sludge dewatering.
12

-------
- SECTION 5 -
EPA Sampling Results
~	Description of EPA Sampling Stations
The EPA sampling stations are listed in Table 5-1 and are presented in Figure
1 (page 2). Composite samples were collected of the raw influent, the primary
clarifier effluent, the trickling filter effluent, the intermediate clarifier
effluent, and the final effluent. The composite samples were collected over
two 24-hour periods during March 20-22, 1995. Grab samples were collected at
the remaining stations.
A complete description of the EPA sampling methods, sampling equipment, and
analytical parameters is listed in Appendix A. A complete listing of all EPA
analytical results is attached in Appendix D.
»- EPA Analytical Results: Conventional Pollutants
The EPA analytical results for the conventional pollutants are presented in
Table 5-2. The data for the primary effluent, trickling filter effluent,
intermediate clarifier effluent, and final effluent are the average of two
composite samples collected during March 20-22, 1995. The data for the raw
influent are the average of a combination of single grab samples and composite
samples as indicated in the footnotes of Table 5-2. The following is a
summary of the EPA sampling results:
~	The raw influent concentrations for BODj, COD, and alkalinity of 293,
575, and 237 mg/1, respectively, were reflective of a medium to high
strength wastewater. Domestic influent BOD^ concentrations ranging from
220 to 400 mg/1 are generally considered to be of medium to high
strength.' Influent COD concentrations ranging from 500 to 1000 mg/1
are considered to be of medium to high strength.1 Domestic influent
alkalinity concentrations greater than 200 mg/1 are considered to be
high strength.' The strength of the influent wastewater may be
attributed to the high percentage of industrial flow.
~	The alkalinity concentrations were 280 mg/1 in the primary clarifier
effluent and 315 mg/1 in both the trickling filter and intermediate
clarifier effluents. Approximately 200 lbs/day of magnesium hydroxide
13

-------
Tahlc 5-1
EPA Sampling Stations
Cornelia WWTP
EPA Station ID
EPA Station Location
C-I
Raw Influent, upstream of bar screen
C-PE
Primary Clarifier Effluent
C-TFE
Trickling Filter Effluent
C-ICE
Intermediate Clarifier Effluent
C-001
Final Effluent
C-AB
Aeration Basin
C-RAS
Return Activated Sludge
C-WAS
Waste Sludge
C-ADI
Aerobic Digester No. 1
C-AD2
Aerobic Digester No. 2
C-RFP, C-REC
Recycle from Belt Filter Press
C-DS
Dewatered Sludge from Belt Press
P-F
Pretreatment Discharge from Fieldale Farms
C-ET
Pretreatment Discharge from Ethicon
C-LE
Leachate from landfill adjacent to WWTP
14

-------
Table 5-2
EPA Analytical Results
Conventional Pollutants
PARAMETER
RAW
INFLUENT
(C-I)
PRIMARY
EFFLUENT
(C-PE)
TRICKLING
FILTER
EFFLUENT
(C-TFE)
INTERMEDIATE
CLARIFIER
EFFLUENT
(C-ICE)
FINAL
EFFLUENT
(C-00I)

niR/l
mR/l
mR/l
mg/1
mg/I
bod5
293a
230
115
70
4U
sBOD5
230a
180°
44°
40°
2.5U,C
Alkalinity
237a
280
315
315
245
TSS
127a
87
140
40
5.5
nh3-n
21b
43
60
57
40
no3-no2
0.42b
0.28
<0.31
0.44
4.2
TKN
52b
57
62
60
53
T-P
6.5b
8.0
7.9
7.1
6.1
COD
575b
420c
—
—
26c
Oil & Grease
12b
-
—
—
5U
pH (SU)
6.6-9.6d
8.1
7.7
7.6
6.9-1.2?
Temperature (°C)
22
22
22
20
16.99-18.76e
Except where indicated, the results are the average of two 24-hour composite samples collected 3/20-22/95. 'Average of one grab (3/21/95) and two composites (3/21-
22/95). b Average of two single grab samples collected 3/21 and 3/22/95. cFrom single composite sample (3/20-21/95). dFrom continuous recording pH meter for
3/20-22/95. eFrom Hydrolab continuous monitor 3/20-21 /95. "The material was analyzed for but not detected. The number shown is the minimum quantitation limit.
— Not analyzed.
15

-------
was added upstream of the primary clarifiers to provide additional
alkalinity.
The NH3-N concentrations increased from 21 mg/1 in the raw influent to
60 and 57 mg/1 in the trickling filter effluent and intermediate
clarifier effluent, respectively. These ¦ increases were due to the
conversion of organic nitrogen to NH-j-N. The final effluent NH3-N
concentration was 40 mg/1, indicating that very little nitrification
occurred through the activated sludge process.
The BODj concentration was reduced from 293 mg/1 in the raw influent to
115 mg/1 in the trickling filter effluent and 70 mg/1 in the
intermediate clarifier effluent.
The soluble BOD5 concentration was reduced from 230 mg/1 in the raw
influent to 44 mg/1 in the trickling filter effluent and 40 mg/1 in the
intermediate clarifier effluent. This indicated good carbonaceous BODj
removal through the trickling filters.
The final effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations were <4 and 5.5 mg/1,
respectively, indicating good carbonaceous biological treatment
throughout the WWTP. The plant effluent was within NPDES permit limits
for these parameters. The monthly and weekly average permit limits are
30 and 45 mg/1, respectively, for both parameters.
The raw influent total phosphorus concentration of 6.5 mg/1 remained
virtually unchanged throughout the treatment process as the final
effluent concentration was 6.1 mg/1.
The raw influent pH ranged from 6.6 to 9.6 standard pH units (SUs). The
final effluent pH ranged from 6.9 to 7.3 SUs. The pH limits from the
Administrative Order were 6 to 9 SUs.
The effluent dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations ranged from 6.81 to
7.05 mg/1 while the effluent temperature ranged from 16.99 to 18.76°C.

-------
EPA Analytical Results; Metals
The EPA analytical results for metals are presented in Table 5-3. The overall
results did not indicate significant concentrations or trends for any of the
metals. Except for the raw influent, the results are the averages of two 24-
hour composite samples collected during March 20-22, 1995. The results for
the raw influent are from two single grab samples collected March 21 and 22,
1995. A complete listing of the analytical results for these parameters and
the corresponding minimum detection limits are included in Appendix D. The
following is a summary of the EPA sampling results for these parameters:
~	Sixteen metals were detected in the raw influent, including five
priority pollutants. The highest influent priority pollutant metal was
zinc at 95 ug/1. The metal with the highest concentration in the
influent was sodium at 68 mg/1. The influent metals concentrations were
below levels which have been shown to be inhibitory to activated sludge
4
processes.
~	Twelve metals were detected in the final effluent, including three
priority pollutants: nickel (7 ug/1), zinc (56 ug/1), and
mercury (0.23 ug/1).
17

-------
Table 5-3
EPA Analytical Results
Mclals
PARAMETER

INFLUENT
FINAL EFFLUENT

(C-I)a
Toxic Level''
rc-oon

uc/l
uc/l
uc/l
Barium
21

3.2
Chromium**
52°
2000

Copper**
18
1000
__
Molybdenum
20

25
Nickel**
12
1000
7.0
Strontium
61

29
Titanium
10


Zinc**
95
1000
56
Mercury**
0.28
2
0.23
Aluminum
795

66
Manganese
58
1000
69

inj»/l
nig/1
mg/l
Calcium
45

16
Maenesium
3.2

14
Iron
0.86
35
0 09
Sodium
68

54
Potassium
28

24
"Average of two single grab samples collected 3/21/95 and 3/22/95. ^Concentrations which may adverserely affect the activated sludge process at continuous
loadings.4 cFrom single grab sample collected 3/2U95. -- The material was analyzed for but not detected. The minimum quantitation limit is shown
in Appendix D. ** Priority pollutant.
1R

-------
- SECTION 6 -
Wastewater Treatment Unit Processes
~	Preliminary Treatment
The preliminary treatment units consisted of one manually cleaned bar screen
with 1/4-inch openings and dual grit channels for grit removal. The bar
screen was checked .once per hour and cleaned as necessary. The grit was
manually removed from the grit channels once per week. The screenings and
grit were disposed of in the Habersham County Landfill.
Chlorine was added at a rate of 50 lbs/day upstream of the bar screen for odor
control. Digester supernatant was also returned upstream of the bar screen.
Oxygen was provided at the upstream end of the grit channels with a diffused
air system for odor control. The influent pH was monitored with a continuous
recording pH meter at the downstream section of the grit channel.
Influent wastewater flow was measured downstream of the grit channel with a 9-
inch Parshall flume in conjunction with a TN Technologies flow meter and a
Chessel 24-hour chart recorder. An EPA installed ISCO Model 3230 flow meter
averaged 2.61 mgd during the period 3/20-22/94. The WWTP flow meter averaged
2.41 mgd during this same period, which was approximately 8 percent lower than
the EPA measured flow. The EPA accepted accuracy range for flow measuring
devices is ± 10 percent of actual flow.
~	Primary Clarifiers
Wastewater from the grit channels was split between to circular, center feed,
rim take-off primary clarifiers. Clarifier No. 1 was 55 feet in diameter and
8 feet deep. Clarifier No. 2 was 46 feet in diameter and 5 feet deep. The
only control of flow splits between the primary clarifiers was by manually
adjusting gate valve settings.
Recycle flows upstream of the primary clarifiers included combined
intermediate and final clarifier waste sludge, belt press filtrate, and
recirculation from the final clarifiers (weekends only). There was no method
of determining the daily volume of in-plant recycles.
19

-------
Approximately 200 pounds per day of magnesium hydroxide was added upstream of
the primary clarifiers to provide additional alkalinity.
Sludge and surface scum from the primary clarifiers were pumped to the No. 1
digester with one 75 gpm piston pump and one variable speed auger pump (160
gpm maximum). The primary clarifier sludge blanket depths were maintained at
a target level of £ 1 foot.
The primary clarifier operating parameters are shown in Table 6-1. The
parameters were based on the EPA sampling results, the estimated total flow to
both clarifiers (the flow to each clarifier was not measurable), and the total
capacity of the clarifiers. The ranges shown in Table 6-1 for the detention
time and the surface overflow rate were calculated using estimated recycle
flows with one and two intermediate clarifier sludge pumps operating
continuously.
The detention time of 1.5-1.7 hours was within the typical range of 1.5-2.0
hours.' The maximum possible surface overflow rate of 824 gpd/sq-ft exceeded
the typical range of 589-786 gpd/sq ft.1 However, this was calculated
assuming that both intermediate clarifier return sludge pumps -were operating
continuously, which is generally not the case. Therefore, the calculated
maximum surface overflow rate was higher than the actual overflow rate.
The BOD5 and TSS removals of 22 and 31 percent, respectively, were less than
the typical removals expected. This may have been caused by the problem of
unknown flow splits to each clarifier and the additional loadings from the
recycled.intermediate and final clarifier sludge. If a flow measurement
system were located upstream of each primary clarifier, it would allow for
appropriate flow splits to each clarifier.
20

-------
Table 6-1
Primary Clarifier Operating Parameters
Cornelia WWTP
Parameter
Measured Value
Recommended
Detention Time (hrs)
1.5a
1.7b
1.5-2.0C
Surface Overflow Rate (gpd/sq-ft)
713b
824a
589-786c
Percent BOD5 Removal
22
25-35d
Percent TSS Removal
31
50-65d
aTwo 250-gpm intermediate clarifier return sludge pumps operating continuously
bOne 250-gpm intermediate clarifier return sludge pump operating at 75 percent capacity
cMetcalf & Eddy, Inc.1
dEPA Troubleshooting Manual2
21

-------
Trickling Filter
Wastewater from the primary clarifiers flowed to a 150-foot diameter trickling
filter for the first stage of biological treatment. A portion of the
trickling filter effluent was recirculated back to the head of the filter from
a pumping station located downstream from the filter. The pumping station
contained two 1400-gpm pumps and one 1800-gpm pump which diverted the
trickling filter effluent either to the intermediate clarifier or back to the
head of the trickling filter. There was no flow measurement system for
determining the daily volume of recirculated flow.
The trickling filter operating parameters are presented in Table 6-2. The
operating parameters were well within the typical ranges. The hydraulic
loading ranged from 277 to 376 gpd/sg ft (estimated). High-rate trickling
filters typically operate with a hydraulic loading between 230-900 gpd/sq-
ft.^ Since the volume of recirculated flow could not be accurately
determined, the total flow to the filters was calculated using two separate
flow determinations: the daily plant flow plus the pumping capacities of the
recirculation pumps with one 1400-gpm pump operating continuously and also
with two 1400-gpm pumps operating continuously. The estimated return sludge
flow from the intermediate clarifier pumping station was also included in the
hydraulic loading calculations.
The organic loading to the filter of approximately 32 lbs BOD5/1000 cu ft/day
was within the range of 30-150 lbs BOD^/IOOO cu ft/day for high-rate filters.-'
Trickling filters are now generally classified according to use and the
treatment provided rather than hydraulic or organic loading rates. Based on
the existing treatment design, the Cornelia trickling filter best fits a
"roughing" filter classification. Roughing filters can be used to reduce high
strength industrial wastewaters prior to conventional biological processes
such as activated sludge. Roughing filters generally provide 50 to 75 percent
soluble BODj removal and 30 to 45 percent total BOD^ removal.3 During the EPA
study, the triikling filter removed 76 percent of the soluble BOD5 and 50
percent of the total BODj, which indicated excellent biological treatment.
These BODj removals exceeded the typical removals expected for roughing
filters. Observations during the DE indicated a good, healthy biological
growth on the filter media, good flow distribution, and no strong odors or
filter ponding conditions.
22

-------
Table 6-2
Trickling Filter Operating Parameters
Cornelia WWTP
Parameter
Measured Value
Recommended*
Hydraulic Loading (gpd/sq-ft)
277b
720-7200

376C

Organic Loading (lb? BOD^/IOOO cu-ft/day)
32d
75-200
85c

Percent Soluble BOD5 Removal
76
50-75e
Percent BOD5 Removal
50
30-45e


40-80f
aTrickIing filter design criteria for combined trickling filter/activated sludge system with an intermediate
clarifier - WEF, Manual of Practice No. 8 3
bOne 1400-gpm recirculation pump operating continuously plus estimated intermediate and final clarifier
sludge recycle flow
cTwo 1400-gpm recirculations pumps operating continuously plus estimated intermediate and final
clarifier sludge recycle flow
dDoes not include recirculation
eRoughing filters
faigh rate filters
23

-------
Intermediate Clarifier
Wastewater from the trickling filter pumping station flowed to a circular,
center feed, rim take-off intermediate clarifier for solids separation. The
intermediate clarifier was 65 feet in diameter and approximately 9 feet deep.
The sludge blanket depths were measured four times per day and the sludge
removal rates were controlled by telescoping valves. The intermediate
clarifier sludge was pumped upstream of the primary clarifiers using one of
two 250-gpm pumps. The intermediate clarifier sludge pumping station also
received waste sludge from the final clarifiers. There was no method of
determining the volume of the combined intermediate and final clarifier sludge
that was pumped to .the head of the primary clarifiers.
The surface overflow rate for the intermediate clarifier during the EPA study
was approximately 787 gpd/sq ft. The maximum recommended surface overflow
rate for intermediate clarifiers following fixed film processes is 1498 gpd/sq
ft.3 The BOD5 concentration was reduced from 115 mg/1 in the trickling filter
effluent to 70 mg/1 in the discharge from the intermediate clarifier (Table 5-
2). The TSS concentration was reduced from 140 mg/1 in the trickling filter
effluent to 40 mg/1 in the discharge from the final clarifier, representing a
71 percent reduction.
Aeration Basin
Following the intermediate clarifier, wastewater flowed into a 0.73 million-
gallon aeration basin for biological treatment. An additional 0.73 million-
gallon aeration basin was available but was not in operation. Aeration was
provided with eight floating mechanical aerators. Return activated sludge
from the final clarifiers was pumped to the head of the aeration basin.
During the DE, the mixed liquor had a dark color with little surface foam.
The biological treatment process was operated with the following strategies
and process control tests to optimize plant performance:
»•	The aeration basin mixed-liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and mixed-liquor
volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) was analyzed five days per week. The
MLSS concentrations ranged from 1900-3163 mg/1 during February 1995.
The MLVSS ranged from 87-94 percent of the MLSS during the same period.
The facility MLSS/MLVSS data are the average of two grab samples
collected five days per week of the discharge from the aeration basin.
24

-------
~	The mean-ce11-residence-time (MCRT) and food-to-microorganism (F/M)
ratio were calculated daily. The MCRT was maintained between 8-15 days,
and the F/M ratio ranged from 0.17-0.37 during February 1995.
»•	Settlometer tests were conducted daily and the sludge volume index was
calculated daily.
~	Microscopic examinations of the MLSS were conducted approximately once
per week.
The aeration basin DO was monitored continuously with a Digital DO meter
and a 24-hour chart recorder. The DO meter was located at the discharge
end of the aeration basin, and the DO was maintained at concentrations
less than 1 mg/1.
*	The pH of the mixed liquor was measured daily and ranged from 6.3 to 7.5
SUs during February 1995. Approximately 250 lbs per day of magnesium
hydroxide was added at the head of the aeration basin.
The aeration basin operating parameters, based on the WWTP data and the EPA
sampling results, are presented in Table 6-3. The recommended operating
parameters shown in Table 6-3 are based on the aeration basin design criteria
for combined trickling filter/activated sludge systems that utilize an
intermediate clarifier.
The overall operating parameters indicated a high MCRT and a high detention
time with a slightly low F/M ratio. Combined trickling filter/activated
sludge systems operate with a lower detention time and MCRT than conventional
systems, while the F/M ratio is two to three times greater than those
typically used for conventional systems.4 For combined processes, the F/M
ratio is calculated based on the primary effluent BODj (neglecting removal
through the trickling filter). The measured F/M of 0.47 was slightly less
than the recommended range of 0.5-1.2. However, the low F/M did not appear to
adversely affect biological performance.
The MCRT of 8-13 days exceeded the recommended range of 2-6 days. The
detention time of 6.7 hours also exceeded the recommended detention time of 2-
4 hours.
25

-------
Table 6-3
Aeration Basin Operating Parameters
Cornelia WYVTP
Parameter
Units
Measured Value
Recommended
MLSS
mg/1
2050
1500-4000*
MLVSS
mg/I
1750
—
Percent MLVSS
%
85
70-80b
Detention Time
hours
6.7C
2-4a,c
F/M Ratio
lbs BOD5 per lb MLVSS
0.47d
0.5-1.2a>d
MCRT
days
8-13e
2-6
aAeration basin design criteria for combined trickling filter/activated sludge system with an intermediate
clarifier - WEF, Manual of Practice No. 8
bEPA, Aerobic Manual4
cDoes not include return sludge flow
dF/M = lbs primary effluent BOD5 per lb MLVSS
eWWTP data (high and low) for period 2/1-28/95
Table 6-4
EPA Process Control Test Results
Cornelia WWTP
Parameter
Units
Measured Value
Recommended
Dissolved Oxygen
mg/1
0.04-0.34c
0.02-0.24f
1-3a
2-3b
pH
standard pH units
6.89-6.92e
7.14-7.25*

Temperature
0 C
17.39-17.44c
17.63-20.01 *

O2 Uptake Rate
mg/t/min
0.51
0.5-1.0°
Respiration Rate
mg/gm MLVSS/hr
17.5
> 12c
Settlometer: SSV5
ssv30
SSVfin
mi/1
900 (350)d
480 (I70)d
330 (140)d
600-800c
400-500°
300-400c
aEPA, Aerobic Manual4
^Recommended DO levels for nitrification. WEF, Manual of Practice No. 11 ^
^EPA, Process Control Testing Manual7
Numbers in parentheses are results for 50-percent diluted settlometer
^From profile of aeration basin at various locations in basin.
From Hydrolab continuous monitor on 3/21-22/95 at discharge from aeration basin at depth of 5.4 feet.
- 26 -

-------
All of the other operating parameters were within the recommended ranges for
combined systems. The volatile fraction of the MLSS was 85 percent, which
exceeded the typical 70-80 percent range.4
The aeration basin influent TKN and total phosphorus concentrations were
elevated for the biological process. The influent BOD^/TKN and BOD5/T-P
ratios were 1.2/1 and 10/1, respectively, based on the EPA sampling results of
the aeration basin influent (see Table 6-2). The recommended BOD5 to TKN and
B0D5 to total phosphorus ratios are 20 to 1 and 100 to 1, respectively.3
A summary of the EPA process control tests for the aeration basin is presented
in Table 6-4 (page 26). EPA process control tests of the aeration basin mixed
liquor included a DO/pH/temperature profile, oxygen uptake tests, respiration
rates, settlometer tests, and microscopic examinations. The DO/pH/temperature
profile was conducted at five locations throughout the basin. These
parameters were measured at depths of approximately one and five feet. A
summary of the EPA process control tests is as follows:
~	The overall process control tests indicated low DOs (< 1 mg/1)
throughout the aeration basin, an initially slow settling sludge, and
normal oxygen uptake and respiration rates. All of the DO
concentrations were below 0.34 mg/1. The overall recommended DO range
for activated sludge systems is between 1 and 3 mg/1.4 The minimum
recommended DO levels for nitrification is between 2-3 mg/1.6 When the
DO concentration in the mixed liquor is too low, the settleability and
quality of the activated sludge may be poor. Poor settling sludge has
been associated with DO concentrations below 0.5 mg/1. Filamentous
bulking problems may also be associated with low DO concentrations in
the activated sludge.4
The temperature/pH profile indicated stable readings throughout the
aeration basin. The pH measured 6.89-6.92 SUs at each location and the
temperature of the mixed liquor was 17.39-17.44°C.
The EPA settlometer tests conducted from samples collected of the
aeration basin effluent indicated an initially slow settling sludge with
a clear supernatant. The settled sludge volume of 900 ml/1 after five
minutes was well above the normal range of 600-800 ml/1. However, after
thirty minutes the sludge settled to 480 ml/1, which was within the
normal range of 400-500 ml/1.
27

-------
»- A diluted settlometer test was conducted using 50 percent mixed liquor
and 50 percent deionized water. This resulted in a much faster settling
sludge, indicating that the initial slow settling rate was not due to a
predominance of filamentous bacteria.
An evaluation of the overall operating parameters and EPA process control
tests indicates that for the current system, the operating staff should
consider gradually lowering the MCRT, while carefully raising the aeration
basin DO levels to the target 2-3 mg/1 range for nitrification.
Previous experience "with raising the DO levels at the Cornelia WWTP has
reportedly resulted in sludge denitrifying in the clarifiers. Subsequently,
high effluent TSS concentrations were observed. Because the existing
biological process includes considerable contact time through the trickling
filter and intermediate clarifier, the nitrifying bacteria should already be
established in the wastewater that enters the activated sludge process.
Consequently, the MCRT can be maintained at a lower level while still
achieving a high degree of nitrification. However, due to the low DO
concentration in the aeration basin, the nitrification process has been
inhibited. This was apparent as the NH3-N concentrations showed only partial
reduction through the activated sludge process - from 57 mg/1 in the
intermediate clarifier effluent to 40 mg/1 in the final effluent. By
operating combined trickling filter/activated sludge systems with a lower
MCRT, the operational problems associated with denitrification in the final
clarifiers may be reduced or eliminated. The return sludge should also be
carefully monitored and may have to be increased.
Once nitrification begins to occur, the alkalinity requirements should be
carefully monitored and the magnesium hydroxide feed rites adjusted
accordingly. Approximately 7.14 mg/1 of alkalinity is required per 1 mg/1 of
NH3-N removed.3 The EPA sampling results indicated an intermediate clarifier
effluent NH3-N concentration of 57 mg/1 (Table 5-2). At this concentration,
approximately 407 mg/1 of alkalinity would be required to provide adequate
nitrification. The intermediate clarifier effluent alkalinity concentration
was 315 mg/1 prior to the addition of magnesium hydroxide.
~	Final Clarifiers
Wastewater from the aeration basins flowed to two peripheral feed, rim take-
off final clarifiers. The final clarifiers were 65 feet in diameter and 12
feet deep.
28

-------
Return sludge was pumped to the head of the aeration basin with one of three
540-gpm return sludge pumps. The return sludge flow was maintained between
30-40 percent of plant flow (0.8-0.9 mgd) and was measured with an in-line
flow meter. The return sludge was analyzed for TSS five days per week.
Sludge was wasted from the return sludge line to the intermediate clarifier
sludge well.
A summary of the final clarifier operating parameters is presented in
Table 6-5. The detention time, including return sludge flow was 4.2 hours.
The surface overflow rate and solids loading were 393 gpd/sq-ft and 8.8
lbs/sq-ft/day, respectively. These loadings indicated that the clarifiers
were lightly loaded as the typical design surface overflow rate and solids
loadings are 400-800 gpd/sq-ft and 15-30 lbs/sq-ft/day, respectively.1
If the MCRT is decreased in the activated sludge process, and the aeration
basin DO concentrations are increased to provide for nitrification, the return
sludge flow will probably have to be increased significantly to prevent
denitrification from occurring in the final clarifiers. Extended aeration
systems typically operate with a return sludge flow between 75-150 percent of
plant flow.1 Although the Cornelia facility is not operated in the extended
aeration mode, the return sludge flows may need to be in this range to prevent
operational problems such as denitrifying sludge. Careful monitoring of the
sludge blanket depths will also be imperative.
A recirculation pumping station was located downstream of the final clarifiers
to pump wastewater from the final clarifiers to the head of the plant. Under
normal operations, the final effluent was only recirculated on the weekends,
when Fieldale Farms was shut down. This was done to provide sufficient flow
to the trickling filters to keep a healthy organic growth on the filter media.
~ Disinfection/Post Aeration
Wastewater from the final clarifiers flowed to a chlorine contact chamber for
disinfection. Chlorine was added at a rate of approximately 20 lbs/day. The
volume of the contact basin was 53,000 gallons. At the EPA measured flow of
2.62 mgd, the contact time through the basin was 29 minutes. A review of
self-monitoring data for fecal conform bacteria (Table 4-1) showed that no
permit violations occurred during 1994, indicating adequate disinfection.
29

-------
Table 6-5
Final Clarifier Operating Parameters
Cornelia WWTP
Parameter
Units
Measured Value
Recommended3
*
Detention Time
hours
5.5b
4.2C

Surface Overflow Rate
gal/sq-ft/day
393
400-800
Solids Loading
Ibs/sq-ft/day
8.8
15-30
Return Sludge Flow
mgd
% of plant flow
0.8
31

Return Sludge TSS
TVSS
mg/1
6950
6450

Sludge Blanket Depth:
No. 1 Clarifier
No. 2 Clarifier
ft
ft
4
3
<3
<3
"Metcalf and Eddy1
k Does not includes return sludge flow
c Includes return sludge flow
-30-

-------
Accumulated sludge was last removed from the bottom of the contact chamber in
October of 1994'. The sludge accumulation in the bottom of the contact basin
is routinely checked by the WWTP staff and removed as needed.
Wastewater from the chlorine contact chamber was post-aerated in a step
cascade prior to mixing with the receiving stream.
».	Sludge Handling
Primary and secondary waste sludge was pumped from the primary clarifiers to
two aerobic digesters operated in series. Each digester was 55 feet in
diameter. The total capacity of the digesters was 511,400 gallons. Aeration
was provided to the No. 1 digester with a diffused aeration system which was
operated continuously. The No. 1 digester was also equipped, with a mixer.
The No. 2 digester served as a sludge holding tank. Supernatant from the
digesters was returned upstream of the bar screen.
Sludge from the No. 2 digester was dewatered using 10 sludge drying beds, four
of which were covered. A portable belt press had been in operation since
February 1995. The filtrate from the belt press and drying beds was returned
upstream of the primary clarifiers. The dewatered sludge was hauled to the
Habersham County Landfill for final disposal.
During the DE, sludge samples were collected of the sludge cake from the belt
press. The sludge was analyzed for metals and the analytical results are
shown in Table 6-6. Although the WWTP dis'poses of sludge in the county
landfill, the land application criteria from 40 CFR Part 503 are included in
Table 6-6 for comparison. Except for molybenum, the metals concentrations met
the criteria established in 40 CFR, Part 503 for a high quality sludge. Four
of the metals were above the national mean concentrations: chromium,
molybdenum, nickel, and zinc.
31

-------
Table 6-6
EPA Analytical Results
Dewatered Sludge
Cornelia \V\VTP
Pollutant
Cornelia-
Dewatered Sludge
Ceiling
Concentration21
High Quality
Concentration3
National Mean
Concentration'1

mj;/kg
ni»/kg
niy/k"
mg/kg
ARSENIC
30u
75
41
0.099
CADMIUM
5.0"
85
39
6.9
CHROMIUM
250
3000
1200
118
COPPER
300
4300
1500
741
LEAD
65
840
300
134
MERCURY
2.1
57
17
5.2
MOLYBDENUM
62
75
18
9.2
NICKEL
44
420
420
42
SELENIUM
40u
100
36
5.1
ZINC
2000
7500
2800
1202
a 40 CFR, Part 503.13 7
k Federal Register ®
u Material was analyzed tor but not detected. The number shown is the minimum qiuntiuition limit.
32

-------
- REFERENCES -
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., "Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal,
Reuse." 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1991.
"Performance Evaluation and Troubleshooting at Municipal Wastewater
Treatment Facilities." EPA-430/9-78-001, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.,
1978.
"Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants." WEF Manual of
Practice No. 8, Book Press, Inc., Brattleboro, VT., 1991.
"Aerobic Biological Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Process Control
Manual", MD-14, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C., 1977.
"Design Development Report, Cornelia Wastewater Treatment Plant
Modifications." Piedmont, Olsen, Hensley, December, 1994.
"Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants." WEF Manual of
Practice No. 11, Water Pollution Control Federation, Alexandria, VA.,
1990.
"Activated Sludge Process Control Testing Manual." U.S. EPA,
Environmental Services Division, Region IV.
"40 CFR, 503.13," (b), (1), July 1, 1994.
"Federal Register". Volume 55, No. 218, November 1990.
33

-------
APPENDIX A
EPA SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES
CORNELIA WWTP
3#

-------
# a

-------
EPA SAMPLING METHODOLOGIES FOR COMPOSITE SAMPLES
AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING
CORNELIA WWTP
CORNELIA, GA
Sampling Station
Composite
Continuous
Equipment
Parameters Analyzed
Raw Influent
(C-I)
X

1SCO Model 3700 Auto
Sampler,
140 mis per IS minutes
Conventional pollutants,
Metals

X
Analytical Instruments
continuous recording meter
pH, Temperature
Primary Clarifier
Effluent
(C-PCE)
X

I SCO Model 3700 Auto
Sampler, 120 mis per IS
minutes
Conventional Pollutants
Trickling Filter
Effluent
(C-TFE)
X

1SCO Model 2700 Auto
Sampler,
145 mis per 15 minutes
Conventional Pollutants
Intermediate
Clarifier Effluent
(C-ICE)
X

ISCO Model 2700 Auto
Sampler,
160 mis per 15 minutes
Conventional Pollutants
Aeration Basin
(C-AB)

X
Hydrolab Model H20 Monitor
YSl Model 54A meter and
Field Probe for DO profile
pH, DO, Temperature
DO, Temperature
Final Effluent
(C-001)
X

1SCO Model 3700 Auto
Sampler, 145 mis per 15
minutes
Conventional Pollutants,
Metals

X
Hydrolab Model H20 Monitor
pH, DO, Temperature
All sampling and chain-of-cu.Uody procedures were in accordance with the EPA, Region IV, Environmental Compliance
Branch Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. February 1, 1991. All chemical analyses were
conducted by the Region IV, Environmental Services Division laboratory in accordance with the Analytical Support Branch
Laboratory Operations and Quality Control Manual. September, 1990.
3^

-------
37 &

-------
APPENDIX B
DESIGN INFORMATION
CORNELIA WWTP
32

-------
yio

-------
Design Information
Primary Clarifiersi
No. 1
Diameter
Depth
Surface Area
No. 2 Diameter
Depth
Surface Area
Total Surface Area
Total Volume
Trickling Filter:
Diameter
Depth
Volume
Intermediate Clarifier:
Number
Diameter
Surface Area
Depth
Volume
55 ft
8 ft
2376 sq ft
46 ft
5 ft
1662 sq ft
4038 sq ft
204,325
150 ft
8.8 ft
156,216 cu ft
1
65 ft
3318 sq ft
9 ft
223,338 gal
Aeration Basin
Number
Volume
2 (1 in operation)
98,490 cu ft, t;a.
730,670 gal, ea.
Final Clarifiers
Number
Diameter
Depth
Surface Area
Volume
65 ft, ea.
12 ft
3318 sq ft, ea.
297,824 gal, ea.
Chlorine Contact Chamber
Volume
53,000 gal

-------
Lfi /3

-------
APPENDIX C
EPA CONTINUOUS DO/pH DATA FOR AERATION BASIN
CORNELIA WWTP

-------

-------
LQQ File Name : CORNELIA WWTP AERATION BASIN
Setup Date (MMDDYY) : 032195
Setup Time (HHMMSS) : 162956
Starting Date (MMDDYY) : 032195
Starting Time (HHMMSS) : 164500
Stopping Date (MMDDYY) : 032295
stopping Time (HHMMSS) : 164500
Interval (HHMMSS) : 001500
Warmup : Enable
==> Setup Variables and Calibration <==
Temperature : Centigrade
Specific Conductance'/Resistivity : Specific Conductance,uS/cm,Salt,Auto range,
Salinity,Temperature compensated
% Sat : 760.0
DO : DO,Standard,Uncompensated
Turbidity : Ratio,Auto range
Depth/Level : Feet,Depth-lOOm
Buzzer : Disable
Stirrer : Enable
Date: 3/21/95
Time
Temp
pH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
HHMMSS
dea C
units
uS /cm
DPt
ma/1
feet
volts
164500
19.19
7.24
925
0.5
0.06(5
5.3
12.1
170000
19.17
7.24
927
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.1
171500
19.14
7.25
930
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.1
173000
19.12
7.25
933
0.5
0.150
5.3
12.2
174500
19.09
7.25
933
0.5
0.11@
5.3
12.2
180000
19.05
7.25
935
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.2
181500
19.02
7.25
938
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.2
183000
18.99
7.25
939
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.2
184500
18.95
7.25
939
0.5
0.120
5.3
12.2
190000
18.91
7.25
942
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.1
191500
18.88
7.25
942
0.5
0.100
5.3
12.1
193000
18.86
7.25
943
0.5
0.150
5.3
12.1
194500
18.82
7.25
945
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.1
200000
18.79
7.25
946
0.5
0.070
5.4
12.1
201500
18.76
7.25
946
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
203000
18.73
7.25
947
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
204500
18.71
7.24
948
0.5
0.150
5.4
12.1
210000
18.68
7.24
949
0.5
0.090
5.4
12.1
211500
18.65
7.24
948
0.5
0.120
5.4
12.1
213000
18.62
7.24
948
°-5
0.08@
5.4
12.1
214500
18.60
7.24
948
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
220000
18.56
7.23
947
0.5
0.17@
5.4
12.0
221500
18.54
7.23
946
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.1
223000
18.51
7.23
945
0.5
0.110
5.3
12.1
224500
18.47
7.23
945
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.1
230000
18.45
7.23
944
0.5
0.140
5.4
12.1
231500
18.42
7 .22
944
0.5
0.090
5.4
12.0
233000
18.39
7.22
943
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
234500
18.37
7.21
940
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
^3

-------
Date: 3/22/95
Time
Temp
PH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
HHMMSS
dea C
units
uS / cm
DDt
ma/1
feet
volts
000000
18.33
7.21
940
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.0
001500
18.31
7.21
937
0.5
0.14@
5.3
12.0
003000
18.28
7.21
937
0.5
0.050
5.3
12.0
004500
18.25
7.20
935
0.5
0.08@
5.3
12.0
010000
18.22
7.20
933
0.5
0.15@
5.3
12.0
011500
18.19
7.20
933
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
013000
18.16
7.20
931
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
014500
18.14
7.20
930
0.5
0.170
5.3
12.0
020000
18.10
7.19
928
0.5
0.170
5.2
12.0
021500
18.08
7.JL9
928
0.5
0.160
5.2
12.0
023000
18.05
7.19
926
0.5
0.120
5.2
12.0
024500
18.01
7.19
923
0.5
0.100
5.2
12.0
030000
17.99
7.18
924
0.5
0.080
5.2
12.0
031500
17.96
7 .18
921
0.5
0.240
5.2
11.9
033000
17.93
7.18
920
0.5
0.080
5.3
11.9
034500
17.91
7.18
920
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
040000
17.88
7. 18
920
0.5
0.200
5.2
12.0
041500
17.85
7.18
918
0.5
0.140
5.2
12.0
043000
17.83
7.18
919
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
044500
17.81
7.18
919
0.5
0.060
5.2
12.0
050000
17.78
7.18
918
0.5
0. 100
5.2
11.9
051500
17.77
7.18
917
0.5
0.130
5.2
11.9
053000
17.75
7.18
917
0.5
0.140
5.2
11.9
054500
17.73
7.18
917
0.5
0.110
5.2
11.9
060000
17 .71
7 . 18
916
0.5
0.100
5.2
11.9
061500
17.70
7.18
916
0.5
0.160
5.2
11.9
063000
17.67
7.18
916
0.5
0.090
5.2
11.9
064500
17.66
7.18
915
0.5
0.210
5.2
11.9
070000
17.64
7.18
914
0.5
0.060
5.2
11.9
071500
17.64
7.17
912
0.5
0.120
5.2
11.9
073000
17.63
7.17
912
0.5
0.110
5.3
11.9
074500
17.63
7.17
910
0.5
0.070
5.3
11.9
080000
17.65
7.17
909
0.5
0.050
5.3
11.9
081500
17.67
7. 17
907
0.5
0.130
5.3
11.9
083000
17.70
7.16
906
0.5
0.070
5.3
11.9
084500
17.73
7.16
902
0.5
0.120
5.3
12.0
090000
17.77
7.16
899
0.5
0.170
5.4
12.0
091500
17.82
7.16
896
0.5
0.13@
5.4
12.0
093000
17.89
7.15
892
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.0
094500
17.95
7.15
888
0.5
0.130
5.4
12.0
100000
18.03
7.15
883
0.5
0.120
5.4
12.0
101500
18.11
7.14
880
0.5
0.190
5.5
12.0
103000
18.20
7.14
875
0.5
0.150
5.5
12.0
104500
18.29
7.14
872
0.5
0.130
5.5
12.0
110000
18.32
7.15
872
0.5
0.020
5.5
12.0
111500
18.48
7.17
870
0.5
0.130
5.5
12.0
113000
18.59
7.17
870
0. 5
0.030
5.5
12.0
114500
18.62
7.17
869
0.5
0.020
5.5
12.0
120000
18.83
7.18
869
0.5
0.03@
5.5
12.0
121500
18.87
7.18
870
0.5
0.05@
5.4
12.0
123000
18.95
7.18
869
0.5
0.050
5.4
12.0

-------
3/22/95
(continued)
Time
Temp
PH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
HHMMSS
dea C
units
uS/cm
DDt
mq/1
feet
volts
124500
19.04
7.19
871
0.5
0.10@
5.4
12.0
130000
19.16
7.20
874'
0.5
0.060
5.4
12.0
131500
19.24
7.21
877
0.5
0.100
5.4
12.1
133000
19.34
7.20
879
0.5
0.060
5.4
12.1
134500
19.44
7.20
881
0.5
0.030
5.4
12.1
140000
19.51
7.20
883
0.5
0.030
5.4
12.1
141500
19.60
7.20
889
0.5
0.050
5.3
12.1
143000
19.68
7.21
891
0.5
0.11@
5.3
12.1
144500
19.74
7.21
893
0.5
0.050
5.3
12.1
150000
19.82
7.21
897
0.5
0.03@
5.3
12.1
151500
19.88
7.21
899
0.5
0.030
5.3
12.1
153000
19.93
7.21
900
0.5
0.040
5.3
12.1
154500
19.99
7.22
905
0.5
0.050
5.3
12.1
160000
20.01
7.22
906
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.1
161500
19.90
7.46
18
0.0
8.240
0.2
12.2
STATISTICS:






Total
Temp
PH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
Stats
deq C
units
uS / cm
ppt
mq/1
feet
volts
Out rng
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Num rdg
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
Minimum
17.63
7.14
18.40
.0000
0.02
0.23
11.9
MMDDYY
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
HHMMSS
073000
104500
161500
161500
114500
161500
074500
Maximum
20.01
7 .46
948.7
.4955
8.24
5.48
12.2
MMDDYY
032295
032295
032195
032195
032295
032295
032195
HHMMSS
160000
161500
210000
210000
161500
114500
181500
Max chg
0.21
0.24
888.1
.4726
8.16
5.04
0.1
MMDDYY
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
032295
HHMMSS
120000
161500
161500
161500
161500
161500
161500
Mean
18.50
7.20
906.2
.4725
0.19
5.27
12.0
Std Dev
0.66
0.04
94.90
.0506
0.83
0.53
0.1
If

-------
141 K

-------
Loo File miip : CORNELIA WWTP AERATION BASIN
Setup Date (MMDDYY) : 032195
Setup Time (HHMMSS) : 162956
Starting Date (MMDDYY) : 032195
Starting Time (HHMMSS) : 164500
Stopping Date (MMDDYY) : 032295
Stopping Time (HHMMSS) : 164500
Interval (HHMMSS) : 001500
Warmup : Enable
==> Setup Variables and Calibration <==
Temperature : Centigrade
Specific Conductance/Resistivity : Specific Conductance,uS/cm,Salt,Auto range.
Salinity,Temperature compensated
% Sat : 760.0
DO : DO,Standard,Uncompensated
Turbidity : Ratio,Auto range
Depth/Level : Feet,Depth-lOOm
Buzzer : Disable
Stirrer : Enable
Date: 3/21/95
Time
Temp
pH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
HHMMSS
dea C
units
uS /cm
ppt
ma/1
feet
volts
164500
19.19
7.24
925
0.5
0.060
5.3
12.1
170000
19.17
7.24
927
0.5
0.09(3
5.3
12.1
171500
19.14
7.25
930
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.1
173000
19.12
7.25
933
0.5
0.15(3
5.3
12.2
174500
19.09
7.25
933
0.5
0.110
5.3
12.2
180000
19.05
7.25
935
0.5
0.13@
5.3
12.2
181500
19.02
7.25
938
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.2
183000
18.99
7.25
939
0.5
0.08@
5.3
12.2
184500
18.95
7.25
939
0.5
0.120
5.3
12.2
190000
18.91
7 .25
942
0.5
0.070
5.3
12.1
191500
18.88
7.25
942
0.5
0.100
5.3
12.1
193000
18.86
7.25
943
0.5
0.150
5.3
12.1
194500
18.82
7.25
945
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.1
200000
18. 79
7.25
946
0.5
0.070
5.4
12.1
201500
18. 76
7.25
946
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
203000
18.73
7.25
947
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
204500
18.71
7.24
948
0.5
0.150
5.4
12.1
210000
18.68
7.24
949
0.5
0.090
5.4
12.1
211500
18.65
7.24
948
0.5
0.120
5.4
12.1
213000
18.62
7.24
948
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
214500
18.60
7.24
948
0.5
0.080
5.4
12.1
220000
18.56
7.23
947
0.5
0.170
5.4
12.0
221500
18.54
7.23
946
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.1
223000
18.51
7.23
945
0.5
0.110
5.3
12.1
224500
18.47
7.23
945
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.1
230000
18.45
7.23
944
0.5
0.140
5.4
12.1
231500
18.42
7.22
944
0.5
0.090
5.4
12.0
233000
18.39
7.22
943
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
234500
18.37
7.21
940
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
P

-------
Date: 3/22/95
T^me
Temp
PH
SpCond
Salin
DO
Depth
Batt
HHMMSS
dea C
units
uS/cm
DDt
na/i
feet
volts
000000
18.33
7.21
940
0.5
0.080
5.3
12.0
001500
18.31
7.21
937
0.5
0.14@
5.3
12.0
003000
18.28
7.21
937
0.5
0.05Q
5.3
12.0
004500
18.25
7.20
935
0.5
0.08@
5.3
12.0
010000
18.22
7.20
933
0.5
0.150
5.3
12.0
011500
18.19
7.20
933
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
013000
18.16
7.20
931
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
014500
18.14
7.20
930
0.5
0.170
5.3
12.0
020000
18.10
7.19
928
0.5
0.170
5.2
12.0
021500
18.08
7.IS
928
0.5
0.160
5.2
12.0
023000
18.05
7,19
926
0.5
0.120
5.2
12.0
024500
18.01 ¦
7.19
923
0.5
0.100
5.2
12.0
030000
17.99
7.18
924
0.5
0.080
5.2
12.0
031500
17.96
7.18
921
0.5
0.243
5.2
11.9
033000
17.93
7.18
920
0.5
0.08@
5.3
11.9
034500
17.91
7.18
920
0.5
0.130
5.3
12.0
040000
17.88
7.18
920
0.5
0.20@
5.2
12.0
041500
17.85
7.18
918
0.5
0.14@
5.2
12.0
043000
17.83
7.18
919
0.5
0.090
5.3
12.0
044500
17.81
7.18
919
0. 5
0.060
5.2
12.0
050000
17.78
7.18
918
0.5
o.ioe
5.2
11.9
051500
17.77
7.18
917
0.5
0.13@
5.2
11.9
053000
17.75
7.18
917
0.5
0.140
5.2
11.9
054500
17 .73
7.18
917
0.5
0.110
5.2
11.9
060000
17.71
7.18
916
0.5
0.100
5.2
11.9
061500
17.70
7.18
916
0.5
0.16@
5.2
11.9
063000
17.67
7.18
916
0.5
0.090
5.2
11.9
064500
17.66
7 .18
915
0.5
0.210
5.2
11.9
070000
17.64
7 .18
9 14
0.5
0.060
5.2
11.9
071500
17.64
7.17
912
0.5
0.120
5.2
11.9
073000
17.63
7 .17
912
0.5
0. 110
5.3
11.9
074500
17.63
7.17
910
0.5
0.070
5.3
11.9
080000
17.65
7.17
909
0.5
0.050
5.3
11.9
081500
17.67
7.17
907
0.5
0.130
5.3
11.9
083000
17.70
7.16
906
0.5
0.070
5.3
11.9
084500
17.73
7.16
902
0.5
0.120
5.3
12.0
090000
17.77
7.16
899
0.5
0.170
5.4
12.0
091500
17.82
7.16
896
0.5
0.130
5.4
12.0
093000
17.89
7.15
892
0.5
0.110
5.4
12.0
094500
17 .95
7.15
B38
0.5
0.130
5.4
12.0
100000
18.03
7.15
883
0.5
0.120
5.4
12.0
101500
18.11
7.14
880
0.5
0.190
5.5
12.0
103000
18.20
7.14
875
0.5
0.150
5.5
12.0
104500
18.29
7.14
872
0.5
0.130
5.5
12.0
110000
18.32
7.15
872
0.5
0.020
5.5
12.0
111500
18.48
7.17
870
0.5
0.130
5.5
12.0
113000
18.59
7.17
870
0.5
0.030
5.5
12.0
114500
18.62
7.17
859
0.5
0.020
5.5
12.0
120000
18.83
7.18
869
0.5
0.030
5.5
12.0
121500
18.87
7.18
870
0.5
0.050
5.4
12.0
123000
18.95
7.18
859
0.5
0.050
5.4
12.0
it

-------
APPENDIX D
COMPLETE LISTING OF EPA ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CORNELIA WWTP

-------
ft

-------
SAMPLfc ANu akaLYju .	i^NT ouiiH
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.	06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*	PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92 983 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED	BY: M BOWDEN *
*	SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA *
*	STATION ID: C-I COLLECTION START: 03/21/95	1345 STOP: 00/00/00 *
RESULTS UNITS
19J	MG/L
0.44	MG/L
52J	MG/L
S .7	MG/L
640	MG/L
290	MG/L
350	MG/L
260	MG/L
170	MG/L
PARAMETER
AMMONIA
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
'~REMARKS***	* * *REMARKS** *
iSULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
* FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI - INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND AN IS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGIO. J ESD, ATHENS, GA.
. 06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93027
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
STATION
ID: C-I
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1400 STOP: 03/22/95 1315 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
100 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
260 MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
220 MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
* FOOTNOTES* **
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAoc.Mt.NT
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
93110 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
STATION
ID: C-I
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1050 STOP: 03/22/95 0930 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
270A MG/L BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
200A MG/L BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
110 MG/L TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
200 MG/L ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
UJ
~ * FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF*PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND P YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG1 IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93026
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
STATION
ID: C-I
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1315 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
23J MG/L	AMMONIA
0.39 MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
52J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
6.2 MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
510 MG/L	CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
0*
•~REMARKS***	***REMARKS4
5SULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
*FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN-TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMFbt: Ahu	rlANrtun-i'iclNT
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
«
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
*	PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92984 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
*	STATION ID: C-I	COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
13 MG/L OIL AND GREASE

~~REMARKS***	* * *REMARKS*
iCOMMENDED HOLDING TIME EXCEEDED.
'~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS	KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND AN 51S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGK / ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93028 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: T SIMPSON
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
STATION ID: C-I	COLLECTION START: 03/22/95 1325 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
11 MG/L OIL AND GREASE

'~REMARKS***	* * *REMARKS'
5COMMENDED HOLDING TIME EXCEEDED.
*FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM'
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92985 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
STATION ID: C-PE	COLLECTION START: 03/20/95 1300 STOP: 03/21/95
1300
RESULTS UNITS
44J MG/L
0.37	MG/L
51J MG/L
8.0	MG/L
420	MG/L
230	MG/L
180	MG/L
82J MG/L
280	MG/L
PARAMETER
AMMONIA
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
<5
~~REMARKS***
3SULTS ESTIMATED
(J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
~REMARKS*'
»*FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND
EPA-REC
\YS1S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93031
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
» SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
* STATION
ID: C-PE
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1405 STOP: 03/22/95 1405 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
4 2J MG/L	AMMONIA
0.10 MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
62 J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
7.9 MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
230 MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
92 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
280 MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)

'~REMARKS***	* * *REMARKS1
CSULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
*FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SruTi^jli AW^tt»J/vLi	lU-H
EPA-REG ION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/16/9
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
•* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92986
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA
»• STATION
k *
ID: C-TFE
COLLECTION START: 03/20/95
1330 STOP: 03/21/95 1330 •*
« *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
60J	MG/L	AMMONIA
0.56	MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
61J	MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
8.2	MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
120	MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND.5 DAY
44	MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
160	MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
3 20	MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)

"REMARKS***	* **REMARKS* * *
ESULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
> * FOOTNOTES * * *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND xLYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-RE	IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93032
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON ~~
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA * *
STATION
ID: C-TFE
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1435 STOP: 03/22/95 1435 **
~ *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
60J	MG/L	AMMONIA
0.05U MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
63J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
7.5	MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
110	MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND, 5 DAY
120	MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
310	MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
•~REMARKS***	***REMARKS***
3SULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
'~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANALYZED ^NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE ~N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ~L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMFCE AtfD~~ENALYSTS"MANfiGEFiENT b tft 1VM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.	06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
~	PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92987 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN	*
~	SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
~	STATION ID- C-ICE	COLLECTION START: 03/20/95 1330 STOP: 03/21/95 1330
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
59J MG/L	AMMONIA
0.59 MG/-L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
64 J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
7.2 MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
70 MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
40 MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
44 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
310 MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
\
~~REMARKS***	***REMARKS*
2SULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
»*FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND	YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93033
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA * *
~ STATION
ID: C-ICE
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1450 STOP: 03/22/95 1450 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
54J	MG/L	AMMONIA
0.28	MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
56J	MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
7.0	MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
69A MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
36	MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
320	MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
**REMARKS***	***REMARKS***
2SULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
~*FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMHbt fUNu HiiHijiaia nftn/iuti'itw i
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
~ PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 929B2
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
STATION
ID: C-001
COLLECTION START: 03/20/95
1300 STOP: 03/21/95 1300
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
33J MG/L	AMMONIA
6.6A MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
NAI MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
6.4 MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
26 MG/L	CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
210A MG/L	ALKALINITY, TOTALfAS CAC03)
4.OA MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
2.5U MG/L	BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY,DISS
5.0 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

'~REMARKS***	***REMARKS«
JSULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
•~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND	YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA - REG j. IV ESD, ATHENS. GA .
06/15/95
RECTIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
» PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
93029 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
» STATION
ID: C-001
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1410 STOP: 03/22/95 1410 *~
* *
RESULTS UNITS
4.0U	MG/L
6.0	MG/L
280A	MG/L
46J	MG/L
1.8	MG/L
53J	MG/L
5.7A MG/L
PARAMETER
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
AMMONIA
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
DAY
"X
~REMARKS***
ISULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
~~~REMARKS***
* FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES ~J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAtJKMhNT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93030 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY- T SIMPSON
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST- GA
STATION ID: C-001	COLLECTION START: 03/22/95 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
5.0U MG/L OIL AND GREASE
V\
~REMARKS***
ICOMMENDED HOLDING TIME EXCEEDED.
'REMARKS*
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE' AND Af" vsiS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGI V ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92971
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA ~*
~ STATION
ID: C-AB
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1117 STOP: 00/00/00 *~
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
2100A MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
2200A MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS
1700A MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
1900A MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
<7^
~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS	KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAFlPLifc MiNU MlNMLiXSX^ riMrmVjC,H C.4N 1 OI^lDl'l
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93024
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
~ STATION
ID: C-AB
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1120 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
2000 MG/L TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
1 GOO MG/L VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
N»
•~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALY2ED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND T YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG1 IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92972
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA * *
* STATION
ID: C-RAS
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1120 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* •
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
7900 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
84 00 MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS
7000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
7300 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
to
* FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93021 SAMPLE TYPE: SLUDGE
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA
* STATION
ID: C-RAS
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1049 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
6000 MG/L TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
5600 MG/L VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
5s
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND \LYS1S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-RE	IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
• PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92975
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN * •
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
» STATION
ID: C-WAS
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1124 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
3 000 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
20000 MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS
17000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
2900 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
«
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT bYb^EM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.	06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93022 SAMPLE TYPE: SLUDGE
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA
* STATION
ID: C-WAS
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1055 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
16000 MG/L TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
14 000 MG/L VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
o
~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND	,YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REG IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
92975 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
~ SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
* STATION
ID: C-AD1
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1132 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
16000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
2000 MG/L VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
2000 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
2 2000 MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS
V)
'*FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED »NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMFLt PiTiv aiiALYoio i*1ANt .w — .^NT v . . JM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93020 SAMPLE TYPE: SLUDGE
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA
* STATION
ID: C-AD1
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1040 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
10000 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
10000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
28000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
38000 MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS
S)
KaJ
' * FOOTNOTES *~*
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED +NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE ANT 'ALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-R M IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92976 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
STATION ID: C-AD2	COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1133 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
41000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SOLIDS
4000 MG/L	VOLATILE TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
4200 MG/L	TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
53 000 MG/L	TOTAL SOLIDS

**FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92974
SAMPLE TYPE- WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA *•
STATION
ID: C-RFP
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1128 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
230 MG/L TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS

'~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND
EPA-REG
YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
93019 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
~ STATION
ID: C-REC
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95
1028 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
370 MG/L	AMMONIA
0.72 MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
370J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
50 MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
1600 MG/L	CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
-o
~~REMARKS***	* * *REMARKS4
!SULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
* FOOTNOTES* * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAutnt'NT
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
* PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
92970 SAMPLE TYfc.: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM : MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN ~~
~ SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
» STATION
ID: P-F
COLLECTION START: 03/20/95
0700 STOP: 03/21/95 0700 **
* *
RESULTS .UNITS
31J MG/L
0.06 MG/L
74 J MG/L
9.4A MG/L
700 MG/L
320 MG/L
NA MG/L
260 MG/L
100 MG/L
PARAMETER
AMMONIA
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5
ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
DAY
DAY,DISS

~REMARKS***	** *REMARKS** *
ISULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE ~NA-NOT ANALYZED #NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPL? AND P
EPA-REG1
YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92981
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: P-F
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1030 STOP: 00/00/00
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
5.0U MG/L OIL AND GREASE

~~REMARKS***
2COMMENDED HOLDING TIME EXCEEDED.
'*REMARKS*
' * FOOTNOTES * * *
*A-AVERAGE VALUE
~NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J- ESTIMATED VALUE . *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE fijiu MjVAL.rii.li. MAJM.	.ENT	ffJM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
'ECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
' PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93034
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: T SIMPSON **
SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA * *
STATION
ID: C-BT
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
0800 STOP: 03/22/95 0800 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS
130J MG/L
0.48 MG/L
140J MG/L
9.1 MG/L
NA MG/L
NA MG/L
NA MG/L
910 MG/L
PARAMETER
AMMONIA
NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
BIO-CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND,5 DAY
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
ALKALINITY, TOTAL(AS CAC03)
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
n5
¦A
~REMARKS***	***REMARKS***
• SAMPLE CONTAINER RECEIVED
~FOOTNOTES***
* A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J- ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OP PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AND
EPA-REC
YSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
06/15/95
PECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
~ PROJECT
NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
92979 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED
BY: M BOWDEN **
* SOURCE:
CORNELIA WWTP
CITY: CORNELIA
ST: GA **
* STATION
ID: C-LE
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95
1150 STOP: 00/00/00 **
* *
RESULTS UNITS	PARAMETER
7.7J MG/L	AMMONIA
0.66 MG/L	NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN
7.7J MG/L	TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
n 02U MG/L	TOTAL-PHOSPHORUS
15 MG/L	CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
*0
~REMARKS***	***REMARKS<
ISULTS ESTIMATED (J)-RECOMMENDED HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN * L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE AMU ANALYSIS i"1AN.,JNT 		*EM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
TALS DATA REPORT
04/27/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: C-I
92983 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1345 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L

5 . 0U
SILVER
37
CALCIUM
15U
ARSENIC
3 . 3
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
0.81
IRON
19
BARIUM
67
SODIUM
2 . 5U
BERYLLIUM
28
POTASSIUM
2 . 5U
CADMIUM


5.0U
COBALT


5.0U
CHROMIUM


16
COPPER


17
MOLYBDENUM


10
NICKEL


20U
LEAD


15U
ANTIMONY


20U
SELENIUM


12U
TIN


46
STRONTIUM


25U
TELLURIUM


9.3
TITANIUM


50U
THALLIUM


5.0U
VANADIUM


5.0U
YTTRIUM


89
ZINC


NA
ZIRCONIUM


0.28
MERCURY


910
ALUMINUM


59
MANGANESE


ANALYTICAL RESULTS
~REMARKS***
*REMARKS'
* FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
SAMPLE ANr \LYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-RE 1 IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.	04/27/95
TALiS data report
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93026 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: T SIMPSON
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP	CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
STATION ID: C-I	COLLECTION START: 03/22/95 1315 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5 . 0U
SILVER
52
CALCIUM
15U
ARSENIC
3 . 1
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
0 .90
IRON
23
BARIUM
69
SODIUM
2 . 5U
BERYLLIUM
27
POTASSIUM
2.5U
CADMIUM


5. 0U
COBALT


52
CHROMIUM


20
COPPER


23
MOLYBDENUM


14
NICKEL


20U
LEAD


15U
ANTIMONY •


20U
SELENIUM


12U
TIN


74
STRONTIUM


25U
TELLURIUM


11
TITANIUM


50U
THALLIUM


5.0U
VANADIUM


5 . 0U
YTTRIUM


100
ZINC


NA
ZIRCONIUM


0 . 27
MERCURY


680
ALUMINUM


57
MANGANESE


~REMARKS***
~REMARKS'
* FOOTNOTES * * *
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
ETALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLit Aftu mjnALYsis i4ANt->ww..-.JNT	EM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
04/27/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92982
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: C-001
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/20/95 1300 STOP: 03/21/95
1300
UG/L

2 . 5U
SILVER
7. 5U
ARSENIC
NA
BORON
3.4
BARIUM
1 . 2U
BERYLLIUM
1.2U
CADMIUM
2. 5U
COBALT
2.5U
CHROMIUM
2.5U
COPPER
31
MOLYBDENUM
7.3
NICKEL
10U
LEAD
7.5U
ANTIMONY
10U
SELENIUM
6.2U
TIN
27
STRONTIUM
12U
TELLURIUM
2.5U
TITANIUM
2 5U
THALLIUM
2 . 5U
VANADIUM
2 . 5U
YTTRIUM
61
ZINC
NA
ZIRCONIUM
0.23
MERCURY
73
ALUMINUM
74
MANGANESE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L
16
15
0 . 10
49
21
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
~REMARKS***
*REMARKS*
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI- INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
ETi DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND LYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-RE	IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
04/27/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 93029
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: C-001
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: T SIMPSON
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1410 STOP: 03/22/95
1410

UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L
2 . 5U
SILVER
16
7 . 5U
ARSENIC
12
NA
BORON
0 . 088
2.9
BARIUM
59
1. 2U
BERYLLIUM
27
1.2U
CADMIUM

2 . 5U
COBALT

2 . 5U
CHROMIUM

2 . 5U
COPPER

18
MOLYBDENUM

6.6
NICKEL

10U
LEAD

7. 5U
ANTIMONY

10U
SELENIUM

6.2U
TIN

30
STRONTIUM

12U
TELLURIUM

2.5U
TITANIUM

2 5U
THALLIUM

2 . 5U
VANADIUM

2.5U
YTTRIUM

50
ZINC

NA
ZIRCONIUM

0.22
MERCURY

58
ALUMINUM

63
MANGANESE

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
~REMARKS'
•~REMARKS'
~FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J - ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
3TALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS	si-3ic.il
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
04/27/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: C-DS
93025 SAMPLE TYPE: SLUDGE
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: T SIMPSON
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/22/95 1250 STOP: 00/00/00

MG/KG
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/KG
ANALYTICAL
12
SILVER
18000
CALCIUM
30U
ARSENIC
3200
MAGNESIUM
NA
BORON
16000
IRON
260
BARIUM
1000U
SODIUM
5.0U
BERYLLIUM
2000U
POTASSIUM
5.0U
CADMIUM
87
PERCENT MOISTURE
10U
COBALT


250
CHROMIUM


300
COPPER


62
MOLYBDENUM


44
NICKEL


65
LEAD


30U
ANTIMONY


4 OU
SELENIUM


25U
TIN


48
STRONTIUM


50U
TELLURIUM


110
TITANIUM


100U
THALLIUM


18
VANADIUM


10U
YTTRIUM


2000
ZINC


NA
ZIRCONIUM


2.1
MERCURY


3000
ALUMINUM


230
MANGANESE


~REMARKS1
~~~REMARKS***
~FOOTNOTES***
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
¦:tals data report
SAMPLE AND LYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REi	IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
04/27/95
PROJECT NO. 95-0203 SAMPLE NO. 92980
SOURCE: CORNELIA WWTP
STATION ID: C-LE
SAMPLE TYPE: WASTEWATER
PROG ELEM: MCSI COLLECTED BY: M BOWDEN
CITY: CORNELIA	ST: GA
COLLECTION START: 03/21/95 1157 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MG/L
5.0U
SILVER
38
15U
ARSENIC
6 . 2
NA
BORON
9.0
82
BARIUM
23
2.5U
BERYLLIUM
8.2
2 . 5U
CADMIUM

11
COBALT

5.0U
CHROMIUM

5.0U
COPPER

5 . 0U
MOLYBDENUM

10U
NICKEL

20U
LEAD

15U
ANTIMONY

20U
SELENIUM

12U
TIN

160
STRONTIUM

25U
TELLURIUM

5.0U
TITANIUM

50U
THALLIUM

5.0U
VANADIUM

5.0U
YTTRIUM

38
ZINC

NA
ZIRCONIUM

0.20U
MERCURY

77
ALUMINUM

2900
MANGANESE

ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
~REMARKS*
~~~REMARKS***
*FOOTNOTES*~~
~A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J - ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
~K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
~U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.

-------
APPENDIX E
LIST OF INDUSTRIAL USERS
CORNELIA WWTP

-------
City oi coriiena
181 Larkirt St. P.O. Box 217 Cornelia, GA 30531
(706) 778-8585 Fax (706) 778-2234
INDUSTRIES AVERAGE MONTHLY USUAGE
Cornelia Veneer Co - 215,600 gallons
Georgia Power Co - 28,100 gallons
Ken-Bar Mfg Co - 41,000 gallons
Ga Mountain Timber - 20,100 gallons
Cornelia Broom Co - 12,300 gallons
Bryson Auto Parts - 5200 gallons
Williams Bros Inc - 345,900 gallons
Short Mfg Co - 14.500 gallons
Ethicon Inc - 4,116,200 gallons
Fieldale Inc - 56,020,100 gallons
Nicolon Corp - 189,400 gallons
EPA Library Region 4

DATE DUE

-------