ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
DESIGN • RESEARCH • PLANNING
7903 WESTPARK DRIVE ¦ McLEAN, VIRGINIA 22102 • 703f790-9300
OFFICES IN PRINCIPAL CITIES

-------
£pfl qoVll-Zl-OSb
REVIEW AND UPDATE OF
MODELING ANALYSIS OF
CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS IN
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Contract 68-0 2-3509
Work Assignment No. 5
Prepared for
U-S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street, N. E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
LIBRARY
US EPA Region 4
AFC/9th FL Tower
5T Forsyth St. S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
July 1981
9205.00/75
Submitted by
Engineering-Science
7903 Westpark Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION	1-1
CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	2-1
CHAPTER 3 SUMMARY OF MONITORING DATA	3-1
CO Monitoring Data	3-1
Meteorological Data	3-1
CHAPTER 4 MODELING PROCEDURE	4-1
Model Selection	4-1
Traffic Data	4-2
Meteorological Considerations	4-2
Modeling for Peak 8-Hour Concentration	4-3
Background Concentration	4-4
Model Validation	4-4
CHAPTER 5 PROJECTED AIR QUALITY	5-1
APPENDIX A DAYS WITH HIGHEST OBSERVED CO CONCENTRATIONS
APPENDIX B DETAILS OF IMM-6 MODEL
APPENDIX C TRAFFIC DATA FOR MONITORING SITES
APPENDIX D SAMPLE IMM-6 PRINTOUTS
APPENDIX E ADDITIONAL HOT SPOT ANALYSIS
ii

-------
LIST OF TABLES
3.1	Summary of Measured CO Concentrations	3-2
3.2	Monthly Summary of CO Concentrations in 1980	3-3
3.3	Surface Weather Observations for Charlotte, NC -
December 5, 1980	3-5
3.4	Surface Weather Observations for Charlotte, NC -
December 6, 1980	3-6
3.5	Mixing Heights for Charlotte, NC - December 4-6,
1980	3-7
4.1	Comparison of Predicted vs. Measured Concentration	4-6
4.2	Traffic Parameters for Three Monitoring Sites	4-7
5.1	Predicted Air Quality	5-2
iii

-------
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In compliance with the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1977, Mecklen-
burg County of the Charlotte Metropolitan area was designated nonattainment
for carbon monoxide. For areas designated as nonattainment, the Act requires
that the States revise their State Implementation Plan (SIP) to attain the air
quality standards as expeditiously as possible. The achievement of the stan-
dards in general is required by December 31, 1982. However, for carbon mon-
oxide and ozone a five-year extension to 1987 can be granted. This extension
is contingent upon a demonstration that attainment is not possible by 1982
despite implementation of all reasonable control measures. The Act further
requires that the SIPs for those areas not achieving the standards by 1982
include a program of automobile Inspection and Maintenance (I&M) in 1982.
Subsequently, the State of North Carolina submitted a revision of their
SIP which predicted attainment of the CO standards in Mecklenburg County by
1987. The Plan included air quality benefits of a proposed automobile I&M
program. The need and the air quality benefits of the I&M program were
based on a technical analysis performed in mid-1978. Since the air quality
analysis was prepared nearly three years ago under a compressed time sche-
dule, it is now necessary to revise the analysis using up-to-date informa-
tion and state-of-the-art modeling techniques.
Consequently, Engineering-Science (ES) has been contracted by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV to study the potential for
attainment of the CO standards in Mecklenburg County.
The study was carried out in two phases. The first phase of the study
focused on a detailed air quality analysis for the three existing monitor-
ing sites in the area. Modeling analyses for CO concentrations at the
monitoring sites were performed for the year 1980 and predicted concentra-
tions were compared with measured concentrations to determine the validity
of the modeling procedures used. The modeling procedures were then applied
to determine the air quality levels for carbon monoxide in future years at
these monitoring sites.
In the second phase of the study, the potential for attainment of the
CC standards at other anticipated hot spots in the area was investigated.
Hot spots are defined as locations where ambient CO concentrations exceed
the ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The carbon monoxide standards
are 3 5 ppm 1-hour maximum and 9 ppm 8-hour maximum, neither of which are
to be exceeded more than once per year. Air quality monitoring data are
considered to provide sufficient information to determine whether an area
1-1

-------
is in compliance with the standards. However, recent studies have shown
that CO hot spots can be more widespread than is indicated by the existing
monitoring networks, since there are a limited number of sites measuring
CO and these sites are not always the most desirable in identifying the
maximum concentrations to which the public may be exposed. Consequently,
various procedures are used to identify potential hot spots.
A preliminary assessment of CO hot spots was performed by the Tech-
nical Coordinating Committee (TCC) of the Mecklenburg County in close
cooperation with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Transportation Advisory Com-
mittee (TAC). The scope of this preliminary analysis was to identify
the potential hot spots on the basis of street configuration and traffic
congestion. From this analysis a selected number of intersections were
identified for further study. Using an approved air quality dispersion
model, carbon monoxide concentrations were computed for these sites for
the year 1983. The computed concentrations were compared with the Stan-
dards to determine whether these sites were potential CO hot spots. The
model was again used to quantify the expected CO concentrations in 1987
at the potential hot spots. The air quality benefits to be derived from
implementation of automobile inspection and maintenance programs were
also quantified. The results of this analysis provide a more realistic
estimate of future CO levels in the area.
1-2

-------
CHAPTER 2
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1.	ES conducted a study of projected carbon monoxide levels in Mecklen-
burg County. Of primary concern was the potential for attainment of
the CO standards in 1987.
2.	Ambient air quality monitoring data were reviewed to determine the
extent of violations of CO standards during the period from 1978 to
1980. The review indicated that there were no violations of the 1-
hour CO standard, but the 8-hour standard was violated on several
occasions during the period.
3.	A review of available traffic and dispersion models was made in order
to select an appropriate model for the analysis. Based on this re-
view the Intersection-Midblock-Model (IMM) was chosen. The model was
updated to include the latest automobile emission factors (MOBILE-2)
as published by EPA.
4'. Detailed air quality analyses were performed for each of the three
monitoring sites. The results indicate potential for violation of
NAAQS for CO in 1987 at one monitoring site even with the implemen-
tation of the I&M program without traffic improvements.
5. In addition to the monitoring sites, 26 additional locations (hot
spots) were analyzed for possible violation of NAAQS in 1983 and
1987. The results indicate potential for marginal violation of the
CO standard in 1987 at three additional sites even with the benefits
of I&M program.
2-1

-------
CHAPTER 3
SUMMARY OF MONITORING DATA
CO MONITORING DATA
Carbon monoxide concentrations have been monitored at three loca-
tions in Mecklenburg County. The data from these monitoring sites are
summarized in Table 3.1 for the period 1978 through 1980.
Data on carbon monoxide measurements for 1978 through 1980 show
violation of the 8-hour CO standards at all three locations. The 8-
hour standard was violated each year at the three sites except at
Federal Reserve in 1979. There were no violations of the 1-hour stan-
dard at any site during this period.
Monthly summaries of carbon monoxide concentrations measured at the
three sites during the most recent year (1980) are given in Table 3.2.
The data indicate that Park-Woodlawn and Central-Sharon Amity had more
violations of the 8-hour CO standard. Magnitudes of the violations were
higher at the Central-Sharon Amity site. The Federal Reserve site had
only one violation of the 8-hour standard in 1980.
Time periods during which high CO concentrations were observed at
these three sites in 1980 are given in Appendix A. Most of the high
concentrations were observed during winter months; highest concentra-
tions occurred in the month of December. Highest concentrations were
observed on December 5, 1980 during the late evening hours. Hourly
variations of CO concentrations measured during the first six days of
December 1980 are also given in Appendix A. Hourly data are given
only for the Central-Sharon Amity site where the measured concentra-
tions were found to be the highest.
METEOROLOGICAL DATA
A review of the data on ambient air quality measurements indicates
that the highest 1-hour and 8-hour CO concentrations were observed on
December 5 and 6, 1980 at all three sites. Surface weather observations
for these two days as taken at Charlotte, North Carolina, are given in
Tables 3.3 and 3.4. Mixing heights for December 4 through 6, 1980, as
determined by the EPA Region IV meteorologist are given in Table 3.5.
3-1

-------
TABLE 3.1
SUMMARY OF MEASURED CO CONCENTRATIONS
Site
Year
Maximum
1-Hour
(mg/m3)
2nd Maximum
1-Hour
(mg/m3)
Maximum
8-Hour
(mg/m3)
2nd Maximum
8-Hour
(mg/m3)
Federal
Reserve
1978
1979
1980
21.9
19.5
21.3
21.5
15.5
20.2
15.9
10. 1
12.8
15.2
9.0
11.2
Park-
Woodlawn
1978
1979
1980
28.1
26.7
24. 1
19.6
22.9
22.7
14.4
14.6
12.7
14. 1
12.5
12.0
Central-
Sharon
Amity
1978
1979
1980
36.7
24.5
36.9
34.2
21.7
30.4
23.6
15.6
24.6
21.4
14.4
19.2
The standards are 40 mg/m3 1-hour and 10 mg/m3 8-hour not to be
exceeded more than once per year.
3-2

-------
TABLE 3.2
MONTHLY SUMMARY OF CO CONCENTRATIONS IN 1980
Date
Monitoring Site
Concentration in mg/m3
1-Hour Period
8-Hour Period
Max.
2nd Max.
Max.
2nd Max.
Jan. 1980 Federal Reserve	10.9	8.6	4.8	4.6
Park-Woodlawn	18.3	18.0	11.2	11.0
Central-Sharon Amity	16.0	14.7	9.3	9.1
Feb. 1980 Federal Reserve
Park-Woodlawn	24.1	17.2	9.4	9.0
Central-Sharon Amity	20.3	18.6	9.3	9.3
March 1980 Federal Reserve	10.0	6.6	4.6	3.7
Park-Woodlawn	12.6	11.5	8.7	6.7
Central-Sharon Amity	14.3	14.0	8.2	8.0
April 1980 Federal Reserve	8.0	6.9	4.7	4.3
Park-Woodlawn	13.8	13.0	8.9	6.8
Central-Sharon Amity	12.0	11.2	9.0	7.6
May 1980 Federal Reserve	10.0	9.5	6.6	6.0
Park-Woodlawn	12.9	12.2	7.3	7.0
Central-Sharon Amity	12.2	11.9	8.3	8.0
June 1980 Federal Reserve	6.9	6.3	3.8	3.6
Park-Woodlawn	11.8	10.1	8.5	6.9
Central-Sharon Amity	10.0	9.7	6.4	4.7
July 1980 Federal Reserve	7.5	7.2	5.7	5.6
Park-Woodlawn	11.3	11.0	7.3	7.0
Central-Sharon Amity	12.3	12.0	7.2	7.1
Aug. 1980 Federal Reserve	6.9	6.1	5.0	4.6
Park-Woodlawn	14.2	11.3	7.9	7.6
Central-Sharon Amity	10.4	9.2	7.8	7.6
Sept. 1980 Federal Reserve	6.6	6.3	4.3	4.0
Park-Woodlawn	13.6	13.0	7.5	7.2
Central-Sharon Amity	11.5	11.0	6.7	6.5
Oct. 1980 Federal Reserve	17.9	11.3	7.0	5.6
Park-Woodlawn	16.3	15.4	8.4	8.3
Central-Sharon Amity	19.1	18.6	10.2	10.1
Nov. 1980 Federal Reserve	18.2	16.2	12.3	11.2
Park-Woodlawn	24.1	22.7	10.8	9.9
Central-Sharon Amity 24.0	21.4	12.7	11.9
3-3

-------
TABLE 3.2—Continued
Concentration in mg/m3
1-Hour Period	8-Hour Period
Date	Monitoring Site	Max.	2nd Max.	Max.	2nd Max.
Dec. 1980 Federal Reserve	21.3	20.2	12.3	9.2
Park-Woodlawn	22.7	19.5	12.7	12.0
Central-Sharon Amity 36.9	30.4	24.6	19.2
3-4

-------
Day =
Hour
0100
0200
0300
0400
0500
0600
0700
0800
0900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
TABLE 3.3
SURFACE WEATHER OBSERVATIONS
FOR CHARLOTTE, NC
December 5, 1980
Wind
Speed
(Knots)
Direction
Temp.
(°F)
Humidity
(%)	
Stability
0
0
36
58
6
0
0
35
66
6
0
0
33
73
6
0
0
31
75
6
0
0
31
78
6
4
230
34
65
6
3
300
32
73
5
3
70
31
76
4
3
90
37
60
3
4
190
45
51
2
3
250
50
39
1
4
200
54
34
2
3
260
57
30
2
3
10
59
26
2
4
130
62
24
3
4
130
62
23
3
4
160
60
23
4
4
200
57
27
5
0
0
53
34
6
0
0
49
41
6
0
0
47
47
6
0
0
44
52
6
0
0
42
58
6
0
0
39
65
6
j	" '¦
'
-------
Day =
Hour
0100
0200
0300
0400
0500
0600
0700
0800
0900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
TABLE 3.4
SURFACE WEATHER OBSERVATIONS
FOR CHARLOTTE, NC
December 6, 1980
Wind
Speed Temp. Humidity
(Knots)	Direction	( °F)	(_%_)	Stability
0
0
41
62
6
3
340
38
70
6
3
190
37
79
6
0
0
37
79
6
0
0
35
82
6
4
50
35
82
6
4
280
35
82
5
4
90
34
84
4
3
290
41
75
3
4
50
50
58
2
3
140
57
44
1
0
0
61
33
1
3
330
64
34
1
3
150
66
26
2
4
140
68
27
2
5
230
68
23
3
6
210
64
31
4
4
220
61
36
5
3
170
59
36
6
4
180
52
51
6
0
0
53
51
6
0
0
47
61
6
0
0
49
57
6
0
0
48
58
6
3-6
-------
TABLE 3.5
MIXING HEIGHTS FOR CHARLOTTE, NC
DECEMBER 4-6, 1980
I. Based on Greensboro Rawinsonde
Data
4th - 7 p.m.
(00Z - 5th)
5th - 7 a.m.
( 12Z)
5th - 7 p.m.
(00Z - 6th)
6th
12Z
6th
(00Z
7th)
Based on Adiabatic Inter-
section - 670 Meters
Based on Inversion Base
(Best) - 670 Meters
Minimum Tx + 5°C
60 Meters
Adiabatic Inter-
section - 610
Meters
Inversion Base -
850 Meters
Minimum Tx + 5°C Data not provided
60 Meters	Estimate based on
maximum Tx and
12Z rawinsonde
975 meters.
Based on Temperature (Tx)
at 7 p.m. - near Zero
7 p.m. Tx
Near Zero
II. Based on Athens Rawinsonde
Data
4th - 7 p.m.
(00Z - 5th)
5th - 7 a.m.
( 12Z)
5th - 7 p.m.	6th
(00Z - 6th)	12Z
6th
(OOZ - 7th)
Adiabatic Intersection
50 Meters
Minimum Tx +5°
60 Meters
Adiabatic Inter-
section - 185
Meters
Minimum Tx + 5°C Data not provided
60 Meters	Estimated 1,070
meters.
Inversion Base (Best) -
730 Meters
Inversion Base
(Best) -
850 Meters
7 p.m. Tx
Near Zero
7 p.m. Tx
Near Zero
-------
Peak 8-hour CO concentrations were measured during the hours of 1700,
December 5 through 0100, December 6, 1980. A look at the surface weather
observations for these time periods indicate that the wind was calm or
exhibited low velocities for most of the time.
3-8
-------
CHAPTER 4
MODELING PROCEDURE
Air quality models are widely used to relate air pollutant emissions
to ambient air quality concentrations. The implied relationship between
CO concentration and traffic is actually the relationship between CO con-
centration and traffic related CO emissions- In the vicinity of roadways,
emission intensity depends upon variables such as traffic volume, emission
characteristics of the vehicle fleet, and operating characteristics of the
roadways and intersections. CO concentrations are also dependent upon the
characteristics of the atmosphere into which the pollutants are emitted.
Factors such as atmospheric stability, surface roughness, and wind speed
and direction are important variables which control the dispersion of CO
emissions from mobile sources.
MODEL SELECTION
There are several air quality models available for predicting ambient
CO concentrations. Among those readily available are Intersection-Midblock-
Model (IMM), Modified ISMAP, CALINE-2, PAL, HIWAY, APRAC-2, etc. Though
all of these models have different computational algorithms, they have the
same generic basis, i.e. Gaussian, which is considered to be the state-of-
the-art technique for estimating impacts of nonreactive pollutants such
as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, suspended particulates, etc.
Among these models, only APRAC-2 (Reference 1) and IMM (Reference 2)
have built-in traffic models to compute queue lengths and delay times for
an intersection. APRAC-2 calculates emission factors according to Supple-
ment 5 of AP-42, which is not the most current methodology available from
EPA. IMM includes a more current methodology (MOBILE-1) (Reference 3)
to calculate automobile emission factors.
After review of the dispersion models available, it was decided that
IMM is the most appropriate for the detailed assessment of CO concentra-
tions in Mecklenburg County. Salient features of the IMM model are des-
cribed in Appendix B. Several revisions to the IMM model have been made
and the latest one available from EPA is IMM-5.
Recently EPA updated automobile emission factors in a computer pro-
gram called MOBILE-2 (Reference 4). ES revised the IMM-5 model to include
MOBILE-2 emission factors. The revised version of the IMM-5 model will be
4-1
-------
referred to as IMM-6 in this report. Thus, IMM-6 represents the state-of-
the-art for analysis of CO concentrations in the vicinity of roadways. It
is a combination of state-of-the-art for emission calculations using the
MODAL model (Reference 5) and MOBILE-2, dispersion modeling using HIWAY
(Reference 6) and the determination of signal cycle times, delays, and
queue lengths through application of traffic engineering principles.
TRAFFIC DATA
Detailed traffic data specific to particular locations being analyzed
were provided by the City of Charlotte's Department of Transportation.
These included the following:
o Traffic volume
o Vehicle speed
o Traffic signal operation
o Vehicle mode operation
o Roadway configuration including road alignments, number of lanes,
lane width, etc.
A review of the air quality measurements had indicated that there were
no violations of the 1-hour CO standard but the 8-hour standard was violated
on several occasions. Therefore, it was decided that the analysis be per-
formed for the peak 8-hour period. Consequently, the traffic data used in
the analysis refer to the average traffic during the peak 8-hour period.
METEOROLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
The important climato logical elements governing the dispersion and
and dilution of air pollutants are wind speed and atmospheric stability.
Wind speed determine the rate at which the pollutants are diluted; a
strong wind results n a high rate of ventilation and consequently rapid
dilution. The stability of the atmosphere determines the rate at which
the pollutants are dispersed; large vertical and horizontal wind fluctua-
tions result in a rapid dispersion. The concentration of pollutants at
any receptor depends also upon the steadiness and persistence of the wind
direction which affects that receptor. These factors, properly combined,
are used to estimate the pollutant concentration by use of appropriate
dispersion models.
The wind parameters are routinely observed and recorded at National
Weather Service First Order Stations and at many military airports. For
this study the surface weather data as observed at the Charlotte Airport
were obtained. Hourly meteorological data for December 5 and 6, 1980, are
shown in Tables 3.3 and 3.4. December 5 and 6 are the days when high CO
concentrations were observed at all three monitoring sites.
A look at the monitoring data (see Appendix A) indicates that the
peak 8-hour CO levels were observed between 5 p.m. on December 5 and 1
a.m. on December 6 at Park-Woodlawn and Central-Sharon Amity sites. The
peak 8-hour value at Federal Reserve was observed from 9 p.m. on Decem-
ber 5 to 5 a.m. on December 6. A review of the meteorological data (see
4-2
-------
Tables 3.3 and 3.4) for these hours indicate that the winds were mostly
calm and exhibited low speeds (1.5 to 2.0 m/sec) for a few hours from a
southerly direction.
Since the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for carbon
monoxide are 9 ppm, 1-hour and 35 ppm, 8-hour maximums not to be exceeded
more than once per year, it is desirable to model for the worst case.
Because of the localized nature of the CO problem, the worst condition
is defined as the combination of high emission rates and adverse meteoro-
logical conditions that results in the maximum ground level concentration.
High emission rates are associated with high traffic volumes occurring
under congested traffic conditions. Meteorological conditions pertaining
to maximum concentrations from ground level sources such as automobiles
will be light winds and stable atmospheric conditions. This is also dem-
onstrated by the meteorological data given in Tables 3.3 and 3.4 for the
days when high CO concentrations were measured at the monitoring sites
in Mecklenburg County.
Though the winds during which peak 8-hour CO levels were observed
are mostly calm, none of the available models are able to handle calm
conditions. For modeling purposes, a wind speed of 2.0 m/sec and stabil-
ity class of 6 (very stable) were assumed. Wind directions parallel to
the highways usually result in the highest concentrations in case of high-
ways of unlimited lengths. In case of receptors near intersections, max-
imum concentrations are expected for wind directions from queue lengths
towards the receptor, since maximum CO emissions occur from idling and
accelerating-decelerating vehicles. Hence, the wind angle was selected
depending upon the type of the intersection and the source lengths so as
to maximize the predicted concentrations.
There are several other reasons for making these assumptions for the
worst meteorological conditions: (1) Wind data are usually ava: .able from
National Weather Service Stations at an airport which can be qui e distant
from the source and the receptor. Microscale circulations near .he site
can result in a different wind regime than that observed at the airport.
This is especially true in the case of CO hot spots which are caused by
ground level sources (automobiles) and are located mostly in urban areas
surrounded by buildings. (2) Wind speed measuring instruments at most
of the airports are not sensitive to low wind speeds. The most commonly
used wind speed measurement system is the cup anemometer revolving about
a vertical shaft. Friction in these instruments is enough to cause the
starting speed to lie in the range of 1 to 2 m/sec (2 to 4 knots). Thus,
wind speeds lower than 2 knots could not be accurately measured. (3)
Studies (Reference 7) undertaken to determine the heat island effects
of cities indicate that at night the average city wind speeds tend to be
greater than those of the countryside. Thus, for the nighttime hours
when calm conditions were reported at the airport, there could be light
winds over the city's build-up areas.
MODELING FOR PEAK 8-HOUR CONCENTRATION
An ideal situation to estimate the 8-hour average concentration would
be to model for the 8 consecutive hours during which the maximum concentra-
tion was measured. However, in this case 6 hours out of 8-hour peak period
4-3
-------
were calm and the model is not capable of handling calm conditions. Hence,
the model was run using average hourly traffic for the peak 8-hour period.
The wind was assumed to be constant for the period. Since an estimate of
the 8-hour maximum concentration is desired, the use of constant wind speed
and direction over an 8-hour period is a realistic approach.
BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION
Carbon monoxide concentrations occurring in the immediate vicinity of
a street or highway are generally considered to be comprised of two compo-
nents: (1) a concentration directly attributable to the nearby roadways,
and (2) a background component that is attributable to other emission
sources including more distant roadways. The background concentration
is added to the locally generated CO concentration to determine the total
concentration at a given receptor. Background concentration is considered
to be uniform throughout the area. Generally, the locally generated CO
concentration is substantially greater than the background component.
Several methods have been suggested to determine background concentra-
tions. The preferred approach involves long-term monitoring and/or model-
ing. Such detailed analysis for background concentration was beyond the
scope of this study. EPA's Guideline for Review of Indirect Sources (Re-
ference 8) suggested a value of 3.0 to 5.9 mg/m3 for background concentra-
tion for the year 197 4. An estimate of the background concentration in
a large metropolitan area presented in the Hot Spot Guideline is 1.7 to
2.9 mg/m3, normalized to 1982 conditions. Normalizing (Reference 9) this
concentration to 1987 emission conditions results in a background concen-
tration of 1.0 to 1.7 mg/m^. For the purposes of this study, the follow-
ing background concentration for the peak 8-hour period were used:

Background Cone.
Year
(8-hour Ranqe)
1980
3.0 mg/m3
1983
2.0 mg/m^
1987
1.5 mg/m^
MODEL VALIDATION
In order to provide greater confidence in model predictions, these
predictions should be validated by comparing them with observed concentra-
tions. Comparison of observed and predicted concentrations has been at-
tempted using a number of statistical techniques. Normally, simple linear
regression analysis is used to quantify such a comparison for annual aver-
age concentrations. Since air quality data from only three monitoring sites
are available for comparison with model predictions, a regression analysis
is not appropriate. Furthermore, such an analysis for short-term concentra-
tions has rarely demonstrated good correspondence between model predictions
and observed concentrations.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide are 35 ppm,
1-hour and 9 ppm, 8-hour maximums not to be exceeded more than once per
4-4
-------
year and a review of the ambient air quality monitoring data indicates that
the 8-hour standard is more likely to be violated.
For the purpose of comparison, maximum 8-hour concentrations were mod-
eled for 1980 traffic conditions and compared with the maximum observed 8-
hour concentrations in 1980. Traffic data for the monitoring sites are
given in Appendix C and sample computer printouts are given in Appendix D.
The meteorological data as discussed earlier in this chapter were used.
The comparison is shown in Table 4.1. Model predictions were slightly
higher than the observed concentrations at two of the sites whereas the
model underpredicted maximum 8-hour concentration at the other (Federal
Reserve).
Major traffic parameters affecting the predicted concentrations for the
three monitoring sites are shown in Table 4.2. Receptor distance from the
nearest lane appears to have the predominant effect on predicted concentra-
tions. This receptor distance for Central-Sharon Amity is 15 feet compared
to 27 feet for the other two sites. This accounts for the low measured and
modeled concentrations at the Federal Reserve and Park-Woodlawn compared to
the high measured and modeled prediction at the Central-Sharon Amity site.
Average traffic volume on the street nearest to the receptor is lower for
Federal Reserve than that for the other two sites. Volume/capacity ratio
is highest for Park-Woodlawn and lowest for Federal Reserve.
4-5
-------
TABLE 4.1
COMPARISON OF PREDICTED VS. MEASURED CONCENTRATION

Maximum 8-Hour
in
CO Concentration
mg/nP
Monitoring Site
Measured3
Modeled13
Federal Reserve
12.3
7. 4C
Park-Woodlawn
12.7
16.3
Central-Sharon Amity
24.6
27.7
a Maximum 8-hour measured in 1980.
b Maximum 8-hour predicted using 1980 traffic data and assumed worst-
case meteorological conditions and include a background value of
3.0 mg/m^ for the 8-hour period.
c Traffic data provided for Park-Woodlawn and Central-Sharon Amity
were average hourly traffic volumes for the peak 8-hour traffic
period. The traffic volumes for the peak 8-hour traffic period
for Federal Reserve consisted of three different time periods,
namely, 1000 to 1600 hours, 1600 and 1700 hours, and 1700 to 1800
hour. These were modeled individually and weighted average con-
centration was computed. Same worst meteorological conditions
were used for all three time periods.
4-6
-------
TABLE 4.2
TRAFFIC PARAMETERS FOR THREE MONITORING SITES
Parameter
Federal
Reserve
Monitoring Site
Park-Woodlawn
Central-
Sharon Amity
Nearest street
Average traffic volume
on the nearest street
(Veh/hour)
Capacity for the
nearest street
South Tryon
560 (1000-1600)
630 (1600-1700)
470 (1700-1800)
3000 (1000-1600)
3000 (1600-1700)
4000 (1700-1800)
West Woodlawn
900 (1030-1830)
2900 (1030-1830)
North-Sharon
Amity
670 (1100-1900)
2800 (1100-1900)
Volume/Capacity ratio
Receptor distance from
nearest street
0.186 (1000-1600)
0.210 (1600-1700)
0.118 (1700-1800)
27 feet
0.310 (1030-1830) 0.239 (1100-1900)
27 feet
15 feet
Receptor distance from
intersection
65 feet
114 feet
190 feet
-------
CHAPTER 5
PROJECTED AIR QUALITY
The main purpose of this study was to determine the 1982 and 1987 CO
attainment status in Mecklenburg County. For those areas not attaining
the CO standards, an I&M program is to be implemented by 1982. To deter-
mine the air quality improvements due to the implementation of an I&M
program, CO air quality was predicted for the years 1983 (one year after
implementation) and 1987 (5 years after implementation). Prediction of
CO air quality for the year 1987, without the implementation of the I&M
program, was also made. The results are shown in Table 5.1.
As discussed in Chapter 3, the review of the monitoring data indi-
cated no violation of the 1-hour CO standards. Hence, the analysis was
restricted to the prediction of 8-hour CO concentrations. The results
shown in Table 5.1 indicate that site number 3 (Central-Sharon Amity)
will continue to have the potential for violating the 8-hour CO standard
even with the implementation of the I&M program.
Model predicted a reduction of 43 to 50% from 1980 to 1987 in CO con-
centration at the Federal Reserve monitoring site. Though the model under-
predicted CO concentration for this site, application of similar reduction
to the 1980 measured concentration would indicate that this site would not
be in violation of the CO standards in 1987. Model predictions for 1980
for the other two monitoring sites were in good agreement with 1980 mea-
sured concentrations. Thus, the 1987 predicted concentrations at these
sites are reasonable estimates for the future air quality levels at these
locations.
In addition to the analysis for three monitoring sites, air quality
analyses were performed for other potential CO hot spots in the area. The
results of these analyses are given in Appendix E. The analysis indicated
that three additional sites will not attain the CO standards by 1987 even
with the benefits of the I&M program. Due to unavailability of data, the
effects of growth in traffic volumes and external-based vehicles (not sub-
ject to I&M) were not considered. However, the results indicate that ap-
proximately 20% growth from 1980 to 1987 in traffic could be accommodated
before causing possible violation of CO standards at more than four sites
as predicted in this analysis.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5.1
PREDICTED AIR QUALITY
8-Hour CO Concentration5 (mg/m^)
Site Number 1983 1987 1987
and Description	with ISM	without I&M	with I&M
1.	Federal Reserve	5.4	4.4	3.9
2.	Park-Woodlawn	11.7	9.4	8.1
3.	Central-Sharon Amity	20.3	16.3	13.9
a Includes the background concentrations given in Chapter 4.
5-2
-------
REFERENCES
1.	Ludwig, F. L. and R. L. Mancuso, "User's Manual for the APRAC-2 Emis-
sions and Diffusion Model", prepared by Stanford Research Institute,
Menlo Park, California for U.S. EPA Region IX, 1977.
2.	Carbon Monoxide Hot Spot Guidelines, Volume V: User's Manual for
Intersection-Midblock-Model, EPA-450/3-78-037, August 1978.
3.	User's Guide to MOBILE-1 (Mobile Source Emission Model), U.S. EPA,
EPA-400/9-78-007, August 1978.
4.	User's Guide to MOBILE-2 (Mobile Source Qnission Model), U.S. EPA,
EPA-400/9-78-005, 1981.
5.	Automobile Exhaust Emissions MODAL Analysis Model, U.S. EPA, EPA-460/
3-74-005, January 1974.
6.	User's Guide for HIWAY, a Highway Air Pollution Model, U.S. EPA, EPA-
650/4-74-008, February 1975.
7.	Studies of T. J. Chandler, 1965: The Climate of London, as reported
in EPA Publication, "The Climate of the Cities", Office of Air Program
Publications, No. AP-49, 3rd Printing, February 1972.
8.	Guideline for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and Analysis, Volume 9:
Evaluating Indirect Sources, U.S. EPA, EPA-450/4-75-001.
9.	An Assessment of the Potential for Violation of the CO Standards in
Northern Virginia in 1982 and 1987, Engineering-Science report sub-
mitted to Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board, May 1980.
-------
APPENDIX A
DAYS WITH HIGHEST OBSERVED CO CONCENTRATIONS
-------
CO
Federal Reserve:
January 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
S	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
10.9 mgCO/nr
8.6 mgCO/m^
4.8 mgCO/m^
4.6 mgCO/m^
February 1980
Monitor down entire month.
March
1980
1 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
8 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
Apri 1
1980
1 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
8 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
May 1980
1 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
8 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
June
1980
1 hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
S hr.
Max:
hr. 2nd
Max:
July
19S0
1 hr.
Max
hr. 2nd
Ma x
8 hr.
Max
hr. 2nd
Max
10.0 mgCO/m^
6.6 mgCO/nP
4.6 mgCO/m^
3. 7 mgCO/irp
8.0 mgCO/m^
6.9 mgCO/m^
4, 7 mgCO/m^
4. 3 mgCO/m^
10.0 mgCO/m^
9.5	mgCO/m^
6.6	mgCO/m^
6.0 mgCO/m^
6.9 mgCO/m^
6.3 mgCO/m^
3.8 mgCO/m3
3.6 mgCO/m^
7. 5 mgCO/m-5
7.2 mgCO/m^
5.7 mgCO/m3
S.6 mgCO/m-^
0700-0800
1700-1800
1100-1900
0600-1400
1700-1800
1700-1800
1100-1800
1000-1800
0800-0900
0700-0800
0700-1500
1000-1800
2200-2300
0100-0200
2000-0400
2000-0400
1600-1700
1500-1600
0900-1700
0900-1200
1-3-80
1-7-80
1-7-80
1-3-80
3-20-80
3-12-80
3-20-80
3-28-80
4-3-80
4-24-80
4-3-80
4-11-80
5-3-80
5-3-80
5-3-80
5-21-22-80
6-24-80
6-3-80
6-16-80
6-3-80
2300-2400-0100	7-11-12-80
0600-0700	7-2-80
0600-1400	7-15-30
2000-0400	7-11-12-80
August 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8 hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
6. 9 ingCO/m-1
6.9 mgCO/m^
6.1 mgCO/nP
5.0 mgCO/m3
4.6 mgCO/m^
1500-1600-1700	8-15-80
0700-0800	8-6-80
0600-0700	8-7-80
0900-1700	8-15-80
1000-1800	8-15-80
-------
Federal Reserve (Cont.)
CO
Page 2
September 1980
1 hr. Max: 6.6 mgCO/m3	1500-1600	9-12-80
1 hr. 2nd Max: 6.3 mgCO/m3	0800-0900	9-19-80
8 hr. Max: 4.3 mgCO/m3	0600-1300	9-19-80
8 hr. 2nd Max: 4.0 mgCO/m3	0800-1500	9-12-80
October 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd	Max:
8	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
17.9 mgCO/m3
11.3 mgC0/m3
7.0 mgCO/m3
5.6 mgCO/m3
November 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
18.2	mgC0/m3
16.2	ingCO/m3
12.8 mgCO/m3
11.2	mgCO/m3
December 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd	Max:
8 hr.	Max:
S hr.	2nd	Max:
21.3 mgCO/m3
20.2	mgCO/m3
12.3	mgCO/m3
9.2 mgCO/m3
0600-0700
0700-0800
0400-1100
0200-1000
10-16-80
10-16-80
10-10-80
10-16-80
0700-0800
2300-2400
2100-0500
1800-0200
11-13-80
11-12-80
11-12-13-80
11-19-20-80
2200-2300
2300-2400
2100-0500
0600-1400
12-5-80
12-5-80
12-5-6-80
12-6-80
-------
CO
Park Road:
January 1980
1	iir. Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
18.3 ingCO/m^
18.0 ingCO/m^
11.2 mgCO/m3
11.0 mgCO/m^
February 1980
1	hr. Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:-
March 1980
24.1	mgCO/m^
17.2	mgCO/m^
9.4 mgCO/in^
9.0 mgCO/m^
0800-0900
0800-0900
1700-0100
0900-1700
0800-0900
0800-0900
0200-1000
0600-1400
1-2-80
1-3-80
1-15-19-80
1-13-80
2-14-80
2-15-80
2-14-80
2-19-80
1 hr. Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr. 2nd Max:
12.6 ingCO/m-5
11.5 mgCO/m3
8.7 mgCO/m-5
6.7 mgCO/m^
0700-0800
1700-1800
1300-2100
1300-2000
1200-2000
3-19-80
3-25-80
3-28-80
3-20-80
3-25-80
April 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
May 19SU
1 hr. Max:
1 hr-. 2nd Max:
S hr. Max:
S hr. 2nd Max:
June 1980
1 hr. Max:
I hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
S hr. 2nd Max:
July 1980
1 hr. Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
S hr. Max:
S hr. 2nd Max:
13.8	mgCO/m^
13.0	mgCO/m^
8.9	mgCO/m-'
6.8 mgCO/m^
12.9	mgCO/nr
12.2	mgCO/m^
7.3	mgCO/m^
7.0 mgCO/m^
11.8	mgCO/m3
10.1	ragCO/m^
8.5	mgCO/m^
6.9	mgCO/m3
11.3	mgCO/m3
11.0	mgCO/m3
7.3	mgCO/m3
7.0 mgCO/m3
0700-0800
1700-1800
0600-1400
1500-2300
0700-0800
0600-0700
1000-1800
1200-2000
1600-1700
1500-1000
1000-1800
1000-1800
0700-0800
0600-0700
0600-1400
0700-1500
4-3-80
4-21-80
4-3-80
4-21-80
5-27-80
5-5-80
5-9-80
5-8-80
6-26-80
6-26-80
6-26-80
6-25-80
7-24-80
7-29-80
7-24-80
7-24-80
-------
Park Road (Cont)
CO
Page 2
August 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd	Max:
8 hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
14.2	mgCO/m
11.3	mgCO/m3
7.9 mgCO/m3
7.6 mgCO/m3
1600-1700
1600-1700
1200-2000
1100-1900
8-19-80
8-26-80
8-26-80
8-26-80
September 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
13.6	mgCO/m3
13.0	mgCO/m3
7.5	mgCO/m3
7.2	mgCO/m3
0800-0900
0700-0800
0600-1400
0700-1500
0900-1700
9-5-80
9-5-80
9-30-80
9-30-80
9-19-80
October 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8	hr.	Max:
S hr.	2nd	Max:
16.3	mgCO/m
15.4	mgCO/m3
8.4	mgCO/m3
8.3	mgCO/m3
0700-0800
0700-0800
0600-1400
0500-1300
10-9-80
10-14-80
10-22-80
10-22-80
November 1980
1	hr.	Max:
1 hr.	2nd	Max:
8	hr.	Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
24.1	mgCO/m3
22.7	mgCO/m3
10.8	mgCO/m3
9.9	mgCO/m3
0800-0900
0700-0800
0100-0900
1800-0200
11-14-80
11-20-80
11-20-80
11-14-15-80
December 1980
1 hi". Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
S hr. 2nd Max:
22.7 mgCO/in^
19.5 mgCO/m3
12.7 mgCO/m3
12.0 mgCO/m^
0800-0900
0700-0800
1700-0100
0100-0900
12-15-80
12-15-80
12-5-6-80
12-6-80
-------
CO
Central:	January 1980
1 hr. Max:	16.0
1 hr. 2nd Max:	14.7
8 hr. Max:	9.3
8 hr. 2nd Max:	9.1
February 1980
1 hr. Max:	20.3
1 hr. 2nd Max:	18.6
8 hr. Max:	9.5
8 hr. 2nd Max:	9.3
mgCO/m3	1900-2000	1-15-80
mgCO/m3	0700-0800	1-2-80
mgCO/m3	1800-0200	1-15-16-80
mgCO/m3	1800-0200	1-19-20-80
mgCO/m3	0700-0800	2-11-80
mgCO/m3	0700-0800	2-21-80
mgCO/m3	1700-0100	2-14-15-80
mgCO/m3	1800-0200	2-14-15-80
March 19SO
1	hr. Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8	hr. Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
April 1980
1 hr. Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
3 hr. 2nd Max:
14.3 mgCO/m
14.0 mgCO/m3
8. 2 mgCO/m3
8.0 mgCO/m3
12.0 mgCO/m3
11.2 mgCO/m3
9.0 mgCO/m3
7.60 mgCO/m3
2000-2100
1900-2000
1600-2400
1500-2300
3-15-80
3-15-80
3-15-80
3-15-80
1800-1900-2000	4-18-80
1900-2000	4-10-80
1400-2200	4-18-80
1400-2200	4-3-80
May 198U
1 hr. Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr. 2nd Max:
June 1980
12.2	mgCO/m3
11.9	mgCO/m3
8.3	mgCO/m3
8.0 mgCO/m3
2000-2100
1900-2000
1400-2200
1300-2100
5-30-80
5-30-80
5-30-80
5-23-80
1 hr. Max:
1 hr. 2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr. 2nd Max:
10.0 mgCO/m
9.7 mgCO/m3
6.4 mgCO/m3
4.7 mgCO/m3
2000-2100
0600-0700
1400-2200
0600-1400
6-19-80
6-23-80
6-19-80
6-23-80
July 19S0
1	hr. Max:
1 hr.	2nd Max:
8 hr. Max:
8 hr.	2nd Max:
12.3	mgCO/m3
12.0	mgCO/m3
7.2	mgCO/m
7.1	mgCO/m3
2000-2100
0600-0700
1500-2300
1600-2400
7-18-80
7-31-80
7-18-80
7-18-80
-------
Central (Cont.)
CO
Page 2
August 1980
1 hr. Max:
1 hr, 2nd Max:
10.4 mgCO/m^
9.2 mgCO/m^
8 hr. Max: 7.8 mgCO/m
S hr. 2nd Max: 7.6 mgCO/m^
September 1980
1 hr. Max:	11.5 mgCO/m3
I hr. 2nd Max:	11.0 mgCO/m^
8 hr. Max:	6.7 mgCO/m^
8 hr. 2nd Max:	6.5 mgCO/m^
October 1980
1	hr. Max:	19.1	mgCO/m-^
1 hr.	2nd Max:	18.6	mgCO/m^
8	hr. Max:	10.2	mgCO/m^
8 hr.	2nd Max: 10.1	mgCO/m^
1900-2000	8-29-80
1600-1700	8-29-80
1600-1700-1800	8-30-80
1700-1800	8-20-80
0600-0700
1300-2100
1200-2000
1800-1900
0600-0700
1200-2000
1300-2100
0600-0700
0600-0700
1400-2200
1300-2100
8-27-80
8-29-80
8-29-80
9-20-80
9-5-80
9-19-80
9-20-80
10-16-80
10-2-80
10-10-80
10-17-80
November 1980
1	hr.	Max:	24.0	mgCO/m^
1 hr.	2nd	Max:	21.4	mgCO/m^
8 hr.	Max:	12.7	mgCO/m^
S_hr.	2nd	Max:	11.9	mgCO/m^
December 1980
1	hr.	Max:	36.9	mgCO/m^
1 hr.	2nd	Max:	30.4	mgCO/m^
8	hr.	Max:	24.6	mgCO/m^
S hr.	2nd	Max:	19.2	mgCO/m^
0700-0800
0200-0800
1800-0200
1700-0100
1900-2000
2000-2100
1700-0100
1700-0100
11-10-80
11-13-80
11-19-20-80
11-14-15-80
12-6-80
12-5-80
12-5-6-80
12-6-7-80
-------
; .
'-r1' V	(	1
,,'ta Edit (	I
Division of Environmental Management
Air Quality Section
Air Monitoring Data Sheet (Hourly)
Emergency Episode | |
Special Study I I
eA


County No.
^,o
Area Code
Q| "71 0,0
Site No.SInspector No.
3.U
J	L
Time Interval
I Hr 2 Hr 4 Hr 6 Hr 8 Hr 12 Hr
•0D2 3CHO sDD6 UD
Pollution Code
COH CO	03 HC
20 OB©
i . in
3
Year
Sp
-
i
2
3
4

SAMPLE READINGS
5 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
<
Start Hr.^ 00
01
02
03

04
05

06
07
08
09
10
11
4
Montn
( ,-L
Data
O.lo
G.(£>
G_ (3
<9.
W7
1.4-
l."7
5
Day
0,1
P.M.
Data
l.H
1-3
X(o
U
i-4
It.o
q
.1
(s.O
5*"}

9. 1
4a 3


Start Hr.
12
13
14
15

16
17

18
19
20
21
22
23



Start Hr.
00
01
02
03

04
05

06
07
08
09
10
11
6
Month
I ,-u
A.M.
Data
7 A
0*<\
0/> (0

(o
U4-
x.o
4-3
7."?
1-G
1.4
M
7
Day
P.M.
Data
l-H
0.°i
T.O
1.
0
X.io
3- \
7
.3
1.4-
\ aH
0. to
Do. (0
0.9


Start Hr.
12
13
14
15

16
17

18
19
20
21
22
23



Start Hr.
00
01
02
03

04
05

06
07
08
09
10
11
8
Month
1 i ~L
A.M.
Data
0,1,
Or (9
O„lo
0„fo
0* (q
0,9
XA
"U
1.3
0.
10 A(o
U.~7
CcoX
—
0.
11
Day
P M.
CaSL


CJ

1 l.i_
I4,q
Ib.q
\4.0

13.7
11.-7
OiW
02 ta




Stare Hr
12
13
14
15

16
17

18
19
20
21
22
23



Start Hr.
00
01
02
03

04
05

06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Month
A.M.
Da ta
2.1
L.O
"3.4
"3.4
I."?'
0,4

I.""?
5-4-
5.1

H-3
13
Day ^
0|J
P M
Od t j
Ul
*-7
(o.O
10.
(a
14.0
20. ^
Tl.3
11.1
3dH
X4.I

V2..
-------
APPENDIX B
DETAILS OF IMM-6 MODEL
-------
IMM-6
IMM-6 is a modified version of Intersection-Midblock-Model (IMM) de-
signed to estimate the impact of automobile traffic upon carbon monoxide
concentration at selected receptor locations. IMM as available from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) includes MOBILE-1 emission
factors for highway vehicles and was labeled as IMM-5. IMM-5 includes
several revisions since its initial inception. Recently an update of
MOBILE-1 was released and is called MOBILE-2. Hence, IMM was modified
to include MOBILE-2 emission factors. Thus, IMM-6 presents the state-
of-the-art of automobile emission calculations, dispersion model, and
determination of signal cycle times, delays, and queue lengths through
application of traffic engineering principles.
The model is able to handle receptors located near intersections, at
midblock locations and along street canyons. The first part of IMM is de-
voted to the calculation of average queue lengths and delay times based
upon input signalization characteristics, lane volumes, and lane capaci-
ties. The queue length and delay times together with input cruise speeds,
accelerations, and decelerations are used by the MODAL model for calcula-
tion of cruise and excess emissions. These emissions are then corrected
for vehicle population characteristics and assigned to traffic links as
line source emission rates, which along with receptor locations and mete-
orological data, are input to a dispersion model for calculation of hour-
ly carbon monoxide concentrations.
The intersection serves as the primary focus for model input and in-
termediate calculations. As the model now stands, it has the capability
of handling a network of up to two intersections. Each intersection is
currently restricted to having two signal phases. For each of the two
phases per intersection currently allowed in the program, there are two
intersection approaches.
Each combination of intersection, phase, and approach uniquely de-
fines a link approaching an intersection. A link is directional; conse-
quently, a two-way street consists of two links. Input parameters for
each of these links include traffic volume (vehicle /hour) for the link
as a whole, west to east and south to north coordinates (km) of the end-
points of the link center lines, effective emission height (m) for the
link, width of the link (m), number of lanes for the link (one, two, or
four), cruise speed on the link (mi/hr), deceleration into the queue (mi/
hr/sec) (must be input as a negative acceleration), and acceleration out
of the queue (mi/hr/sec). The link centerline endpoints need not be num-
bered in any particular order since the coordinates of the approximate
center of the intersection (a set of variables input earlier) serve to
fix the orientation of the link. An option is provided for consideration
B-1
-------
of the link as a cut section of a specified width (m). The fractional
portion of the link emissions assigned to each lane is also input to the
program, and used to input into the dispersion submodel; however, the
volume of traffic per link used in the calculation of cycle time, green
time, delay, and queue length is calculated within the program simply by
dividing the total link volume by the number of lanes. For specifying
the fractional emissions for each lane within a link, the order of the
lanes is from left to right when looking along the link from the first
specified endpoint to the second. Finally, an hourly adjustment of the
volume on all links is also input to the program.
Parameters for those links not approaching an intersection are input
after all the data pertaining to the links that do approach an intersection
are read into the program. The same parameters are input for these links
except for the accelerations into and out of the queue. Also, only a
single vehicle speed is specified. For these links the queue lengths and
delay times are set equal to zero by the program. In setting up the co-
ordinates for these two different types of links, the links approaching
an intersection should terminate at the intersection stop line while the
link not approaching the intersection (leaving the intersection) should
originate at the terminus of the first link to ensure that the emissions
from the actual intersection are realistic.
EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS
After the link parameters have been input, the emissions for the three
different modes (cruise, idle, and acceleration-deceleration) are calculated.
The cruise and acceleration-deceleration emissions are calculated by use of
the EPA MODAL Analysis Model,1 parts of which have been incorporated as sub-
routines in the IMM. Idle emissions are calculated by use of the MOBILE-2
program.^
Traffic Calculations
Once the cruise, idling, and acceleration-deceleration emissions rates
have been determined, the traffic calculations are carried out. If the "free
flow" program option has been specified by the user, no traffic calculations
are performed and cruise emissions are assumed everywhere. If the signal
for a particular intersection is fixed time, then the green time and the
cycle time are specified by the user. For a demand actuated signal, these
are computed internally by the IMM-6 program.
EMISSION CORRECTION
Since the emissions obtained from the MODAL Analysis Model correspond
to 1977 emission rates for light-duty vehicles, corrections must be made
to account for the actual calendar year emission rates and the effects of
vehicle mix, temperature, altitude, percent cold-start operation, and per-
cent hotstart operation.
The MOBILE-2 program is used to calculate correction factors to accom-
plish this correction. The MOBILE-2 program allows the correction of idle
B-2
-------
cruise, deceleration, and acceleration emissions calculated according to
the following equations:
S modified MOBILE-2 composite idle emission factor for specified
EI = Scenario S (i.e., specified year cold starts and hot starts,
temperature, vehicle mix, etc.)
S	S
Ec = Ec E FTp
Ebase
FTP
S	S
Ed = Ed E ftp
Ebase
FTP
S	S
Ea = EA E ftp
Ebase
FTP
where e*5336 = the MOBILE-2 composite emission estimate at the average
FTP speed for which Eq, Ea, or Ep were calculated and a sta-
bilized 100 percent LDV vehicle mix for 1977 low altitude.
S = the MOBILE-2 composite emission estimate for the specified
eFTP scenario.
These equations multiply the MODAL Model emission estimate by the ratio of
two MOBILE-2 emission estimates, one for the scenario of interest and one
at the same conditions as the MODAL Model.
Dispersion Calculations
The lane-by-lane emissions for each link are used by the EPA HIWAY
Model^ or the Street Canyon Model** for the calculation of hourly carbon
monoxide concentrations at selected receptor locations.
Since the EPA HIWAY Model has been described in detail elsewhere, we
will present here only a brief discussion of its operational characteristics.
The contribution of each small element of roadway to the concentration at a
receptor location is calculated as a function of wind direction, wind speed,
and stability by use of the Gaussian plume formula. The contribution of
the entire length of the roadway is obtained by line integration of the
expression. Since the HIWAY Model was designed originally to accept emis-
sions input for an entire street (both directions of travel), it will accept
only the following numbers of lanes: 1, 2, 4, etc. It also requires the
input of a median strip width. Since we desired to input data to HIWAY (now
a subroutine of the IMM) on a link-by-link basis, the median width was set
equal to zero, but the lane number restriction still remained so that three
lanes per link could not be used. One way to circumvent this problem is to
assume a fourth lane with zero volume and increase the link volume so that
the link volume divided by the new number of lanes gives the same volume per
B-3
-------
lane. This will ensure that the queue lengths and delays will be cal-
culated properly. Then the fraction of link emissions assigned to each
lane must be multiplied by the ratio of the number of old lanes to the
number of new lanes with the fraction assigned to the new lane equal to
zero. This second step will ensure that the emissions per lane will not
be affected. In any case, the user must remember to locate the link
centerline at the physical centerline of the link. The HIWAY Model will
assume that all lanes have the same width and that the width of each lane
is equal to the link width divided by the number of lanes. Another com-
plication that may arise is the fact that the IMM requires that each in-
tersection have four approaches: two for each of the two phases. If an
actual intersection has fewer than four approaches, then a dummy approach
must be specified with a very small volume (i.e., some fraction of a
vehicle per hour) or the program will end execution with an error.
The Street Canyon Model is used only for those link-receptor combina-
tions for which the user has indicated a potential of a street canyon, and
for which the following test in IMM holds on an hourly basis.
Where: H = building height (m)
W = street canyon width (m)
u = wind speed (m/sec)
K = turbulent diffusivity (m^/sec)
Values for K are 25.5, 5.5, 1.75, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.5 m^/sec for at-
mospheric stabilities 1 through 6 (A through F), respectively. Once both
of the conditions for a street canyon configuration are met, the concentra-
tion assigned to a street canyon receptor will depend upon which side of the
street the receptor is located and the direction of the wind with respect
to the street orientation.
B-4
-------
APPENDIX C
TRAFFIC DATA FOR MONITORING SITES
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL

Time Period:
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Central
Ave./Sharon Amity Rd.;
X= 0.078
Km; Y=
0.097 Km
Phasing: 7-phase full
actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
Nl JLlA 1
E(Cent.
) S( S. A.)
W(Cent.)
Units
Approach Link:




Qeg.X
0.097
0.177
0.065
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.197
0.046
0.000
0.137
Km
End X
0.077
0.094
0.079
0.064
Km
End Y
0.116
0.103
0.081
0.099
Km
Width
7.6
7.4
6.9
7.0
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
2800
2700
2400
2800
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
670
1030
1000
1230
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.088
0.089
0.070
0.069
Km
Beg. Y
0.113
0.084
0.085
0.109
Km
End X
0.107
0.172
0.051
0.004
Km
End Y
0.195
0.036
0.003
0.146
Km
Width
7.4
7.1
6.9
6.7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
*
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
980
1000
950
1000
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X
0.080



Km
Y
0.155



Km
Z
3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 10:00 - 16:00
Intersection: First St./Tryon St. (26);	X= .083 Km;Y= .068 Km
Phasing: 2-phase, fixed time (coordinated); cycle= 60 sec. (25-First/35 Tryon)
Parameter
N(Tryon)
E(1st
L.J.UK.
) S(Trvon)
W(1st )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.178
0.147
0.004
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.148
0.000
0.000
0.156
Km
End X
0.089
0.094
0.076
0.071
Km
End Y
0.076
0.059
0.058
0.077
Km
Width
7.3
5.8
7-3
9.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
0
3000
2500
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
440
0
490
210
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.092
0.094
0.073
0.071
Km
Beg. Y
0.071
0.059
0.063
0.077
Km
End X
0.182
0.147
0.000
0.000
Km
End Y
0.144
0.000
0.005
0.156
Km
Width
7.3
5.8
7.3
9.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
0
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m. p. h.
Volume
560
130
450
0
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X
0.190



Km
Y
0.133



Km
Z
3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 16:00 - 17:00
Intersection: First St./Tryon St. (26);	X= .083 Km;Y= .068 Km
Phasing: 2-phase, fixed time (coordinated); cycle= 90 sec. (31-First/59 Tryon)
Link
Parameter
N(Trvon)
Ef 1st
) S(Trvon)
W(1st )
Uniu
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.178
0.147
0.004
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.148
0.000
0.000
0.156
Km
End X
0.089
0.094
0.076
0.071
Km
End Y
0.076
0.059
0.058
0.077
Km
Width
7.3
5.8
7.3
9.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
0
3000
2500
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
58jZ>

59;
290
J
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.092
0.094
0.073
0.071
Km
Beg. Y
0.071
0.059
0.063
0.077
Km
End X
0.182
0.147
0.000
0.000
Km
End Y
0.144
0.000
0.005
0.156
Km
Width
7-3
5.8
7.3
9.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
0
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m.p.h.
Volume
Receptor Location:
640
190
J
6QJ0
0
veh/hr.
X
0.190



Km
Y
0.133



Km
Z
3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: First St./Tryon St. (26);
Phasing: 2-phase, fixed time (coordinated);
Time Period: 17:00 - 18:00
X= .083	Km; Y= .068 Km
cycle= 90 sec.	(31-First/59 Tryon)
Link
Parameter
N(Trvon)
E( 1 at
) S(Trvon)
W(1st )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.178
0.147
0.004
0.000
Km
Beg.Y
0.148
0.000
0.000
0.156
Km
End X
0.089
0.094
0.076
0.071
Km
End Y
0.076
0.059
0.058
0.077
Km
Width
9.1
5.8
9.1
9.1
Meters
# of Lanes
3
0
3
2
#
Capacity
4000
0
4000
2500
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
600
0
470
410
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.092
0.094
0.073
0.071
Km
Beg.Y
0.071
0.059
0.063
0.077
Km
End X
0.182
0.147
0.000
0.000
Km
End Y
0.144
0.000
0.005
0.156
Km
Width
9.1
5.8
9.1
9.1
Meters
§ of Lanes
3
1
3
0
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m. p. h •
Volume
560
280
660
0
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X
0.190



Km
Y
0.133



Km
Z
3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
10:00
- 16:00
Intersection: Second St./Tryon St.(26);
X= 0.186
Km;Y=
0.152 Km
Phasing: 2-phase, fixed
time (coordinated);
cycle= 60 sec
. (25-First/35-Tryon)
(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Trvon)
E(2nd
) S(Trvon)
W(2nd )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.271
0.247
0.092
0.097
Km
Beg.Y
0.228
0.092
0.071
0.247
Km
End X
0.192
0.198
0.182
0.176
Km
End Y
0.160
0.142
0.144
0.160
Km
Width
7.3
5.6
7.3
9.4
Meters
$ of Lanes
2
2
2
0
t
Capacity
3000
2500
3000
0
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m. p. h.
Volume
450
180
560
0
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.196
0.198
0.178
0.176
Km
Beg.Y
0.154
0.14?
0.148
0.160
Km
End X
0.271
0.247
0.089
0.097
Km
End Y
0.215
0.092
0.076
0.247
Km
Width
7.3
5.6
7.3
9.4
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
540
0
440
210
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.190

Km
Y


0.133

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Second St
Phasing: 2-phase, fixed
Time Period: 16:00 - 17:00
,/Tryon St.(30);	X= 0.186 Km;Y= 0.152 Km
time (coordinated); cycles 90 sec. (38-Second/52-Tryon)
Link
Parameter
N(Trvon)
E( 2nd )
S(Trvon)
W(2nd )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.271
0.247
0.092
0.097
Km
Beg. Y
0.228
0.092
0.071
0.247
Km
End X
0.192
0.198
0.182
0.176
Km
End Y
0.160
0.142
0.144
0.160
Km
Width
7.3
5.6
7.3
9.4
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
0
#
Capacity
3000
2500
3000
0
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m.p.h.
Volume
470 j
320/
6JJ0
0
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.196
0.198
0.178
0.176
Km
Beg. Y
0.15-4
0.142
0.148
0.160
Km
End X
0.271
0.247
0.089
0.097
Km
End Y
0.215
0.092
0.076
0.247
Km
Width
7.3
5.6
7.3
9.4
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
630
0
580
190
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.190

Km
Y


0.133

Kn
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Second St.
Phasing: 2-pbase, fixed
Time Period: 17:00 - 18:00
/Tryon St.(30);	X= 0.186 Km;Y= 0.152 Km
time (coordinated); cycles 90 sec. (38-Second/52-Tryon)
VLinK;
Parameter
N(Trvon)
E( 2nd
L.J.IIK
) S(Trvon)
W( 2nd )
Onits
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.271
0.247
0.092
0.097
Km
Beg. Y
0.228
0.092
0.071
0.247
Km
End X
0.192
0.198
0.182
0.176
Km
End Y
0.160
0.142
0.144
0.160
Km
Width
9.1
5.6
9-1
9.4
Meters
# of Lanes
3
2
3
0
#
Capacity
4000
2500
4000
0
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
0
m. p. h.
Volume
470
250
560
0
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.196
0.198
0.178
0.176
Km
Beg. Y
0.154
0.142
0.148
0.160
Km
End X
0.271
0.247
0.089
0.097
Km
End Y
0.215
0.092
0.076
0.247
Km
Width
9.1
5.6
9.1
9.4
Meters
# of Lanes
3
0
3
2
#
Speed Limit
35
0
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
580
0
590
120
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.190

Km
Y


0.133

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
10:30
- 18:30
Intersection: Park Rd./Woodlawn Rd.;

X= 0.102
Km; Y=
0.107 Km
Phasing: 8-phase fully
actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Park )
E(Wood.
) S(Park )
W(Wood.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.107
0.208
0.102
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.216
0.103
0.000
0.130
Km
End X
0.100
0.123
0.104
0.080
Km
End Y
0.126
0.110
0.090
0.107
Km
Width
7.0
6.8
7.3
8.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
t
Capacity
2900
3000
3000
2900
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume
750
610
880
900
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.111
0.126
0.095
0.083
Km
Beg. Y
0.124
0.097
0.090
0.119
Km
End X
0.120
0.209
0.089
0.000
Km
End Y
0.215
0.091
0.000
0.138
Km
Width
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.1
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume
840
870
780
650
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.070
Km
Y



0.098
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
APPENDIX D
SAMPLE IMM-6 PRINTOUTS
-------
INTERSECTION-MIDBLOCK MODEL, VERSION 3, LEVEL 15
GCA/TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
ITE. •• C.	SHfiPo** ftir>/7y
£ 19 87 U'~T7t ^
NUMBER OF HOURS FOR THE SIMULATION= 1
NUMBER OF RECEt'TUkS= 1
NUMBER OF INTERSECTIONS 1
IPRSUl=1
IPRS! 12 - O
IPRSH3=0
I PRSN"+ = 1
IFLAG5=1
IFLAG6 = 't
IDIFLG-0
IFLAG7=B
IPRSL'a = l
FOR INTERSECTION 1 NO FREE FLOW CONDITIONS ASSUMED
INTERSECTION 1 IS CONTROLLED BY A DEMAND ACTUATED SIGNAL
CENTER OF INTERSECTION IS 0.078 KM EAST AND 0.097 KM NORTH
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 1
XI = 0.097	Y1 = 0.197 X2 = 0.077 Y2 = 0.116 KM
NUMBER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 1 VOLUME ON LANE 1 =0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 1 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
LINK UIDTH = 7.60 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LINK IS AT GRADE
LANE CAPACITY = 2800.0 VEHICLES/HOUR VOLUME = 670.0 VEHICLES/HOUR
SPEED IIUO INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR	SPEED OUT OF INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR
ACCELERATION INTO INTERSECTION = -2.50 MI/HR/SEC ACCELERATION OUT OF INTERSECTION = 2'.50 MI/HR/SEC
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 2
XI = 0.117	Y1 = 0.046 X2 = 0.094 Y2 = 0.103 KM
NUMBER OF LANES = 2
-------
FRACTION OF LINK 2 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 2 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
LINK MI DTK = 7.40 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LINK IS AT GRADE
LAtlE CAPACITY = 2700 . 0 VEIIICLES/NOUR VOLUME = 1030 . 0 VEHICLES/HOUR
SPF.ED INTO INTERSECTION = 15.0 MI/IIR SPEED OUT OF INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR
ACCELERATION INTO INTERSECTION = -2.50 MI/HR/SEC ACCELERATION OUT OF INTERSECTION = 2.50 MI/HR/SEC
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 3
XI = 0.065	Y1 = 0.0	X2 = 0.079	Y2 = 0.081 KM
NUMBER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 3 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 3 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
LINK UIDTII = 6.90 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LINK 13 AT GRADE
LANC CAPACITY = 2400 . 0 VEIIICLES/HOUR	VOLUME = 1000.0 VEHICLES/HOUR
SPEED INTO INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR SPEED OUT OF INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/IIR
ACCELERATION INTO INTERSECTION = -2.50 MI/IIR/SEC	ACCELERATION OUT OF INTERSECTION = 2.50 MI/HR/SEC
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 4
XI = 0.0	Y1 = 0.137 X2 = 0.064 Y2 = 0.099 KM
HUI1BER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 4 VOLUME OH LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 4 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
LINK UIUTH = 7.00 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LINK IS AT GRADE
LANE CAPACITY = 2800.0 VEHICLES/HOUR VOLUME = 1230.0 VEHICLES/HOUR
SPEED INTO INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR	SPEED OUT OF INTERSECTION = 45.0 MI/HR
ACCELERATION INTO INTERSECTION = -2.50 MI/HR/SEC ACCELERATION OUT OF INTERSECTION = 2.50 MI/HR/SEC
-------
THE FOLLOWING DATA APPLIES TO THOSE LINKS WHICH DO NOT APPROACH ANY INTERSECTION
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 5
XI = 0.088	Y1 = 0.113 . X2 = 0.107	Y2 = 0.195 KM
LINK UIDTH = 7.40 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LIIi:< IS AT GRADE
NUMDER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 5 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 5 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
VOLUME= 980.00 VEHICLES/HOUR SPEED=	45.00 MI/HR
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 6
XI = 0.089 Y1 = 0.084 X2 = 0.172 Y2 = 0.036 KM
LINK UIDTH = 7.10 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT =0.0 METERS
LINK IS AT GRADE
NUMBER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 6 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 6 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
VOLUME 1000.00 VEIIICLES/HOUR SPEED= 45.00 MI/HR
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 7
XI = 0.070	Y1 = 0.085	X2 = 0.051	Y2 = 0.003 KM
LINK WIDTH = 6.90 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT =0.0 METERS
LINK IS AT GRADE
NUMBER OF LANES = ,2
FRACTION OF LINK 7 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LINK 7 VOLUME ON LANE 2 = 0.50
VOLUHE= 950.00 VEHICLES/HOUR SPEED=	45.00 MI/HR
-------
INPUT DATA FOR LINK 8
XI - 0.069	Y1 = 0.109	X2 = 0. 00<»	Y2 = 0.146 KM
LIHK WIDTH = 6.70 METERS	EMISSION HEIGHT = 0.0 METERS
LINK 15 AT GRADE
NUMBER OF LANES = 2
FRACTION OF LINK 8 VOLUME ON LANE 1 = 0.50
FRACTION OF LIHK 8 VOLUME OH LANE 2 = 0.50
VOLUNE= 1000.00 VEHICLES/HOUR SPEED=	45.00 MI/HR
TOTAL NUMBER OF LIHKS IS 8
OF WHICH 4 ARE LINKS UJHICII DO HOT APPROACH ANY INTERSECTION
-------
DATA FOR RECEPTOR 1
XX=	0.0S0 YY= 0.155 2=	3.00
HOURLY RATIOS OF VOLUME TO AVERAGE VOLUME
1.00
-------
I MM 6 RUM FOR INT i!2 - 87 IM (C. Gf S	'TZJ
x TOTAL HC EMISSION FACTORS INCLUDE EVAP. IIC EMISSION FACTORS
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 19S7	TEMP'- 49.0(F)	0 . 7 2 9/0 . 0 7 7/0 . 046/0 . 0 42/0 . 0 33/0 . 0 0 9
REGION: 49-STATE	5.0/ 5.0/ 5.0 MPH ( 5.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS DEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
TOTAL IIC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
6.67
103.77
2.22
LDT1
10.60
144.91
2.43
LDT2
6 .68
84.94
1.70
HDG
22.15
403.78
7 .18
HDD
7.87
35. 01
29.63
MC
15.60
100.11
1. 06
ALL MODES
7 . 39
110.01
3.28
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0CF)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
5.0/ 5.0/ 5.0 MPII (5.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1937
REGION: 49-STATE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 255: MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	'HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL HC: 5.61 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	5.61
EXHAUST CO: 81.25 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	81.25
EXHAUST NO-,:: 1.56 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.56
CAUTION: IM, T.'JUCK , OR ALII CORRECTION CALLED FOR
IDLE EMISSIONS CALCULATED BY ALTERNATE METHOD
IDLING EMISSIONS: 0.1924E+00 GM/VEHICLE/SEC
COR.RATIO IS
ACCELERATION EMISSIONS DECELERATION EMISSIONS	CRUISE EMISSIONS
INS Pll APP LIIHH CORRECTED RATIO+ CORRECTED RATIO+ CORRECTED RATIO +
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1'jH7	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0 . 077/0 . 046/0 . 042/0 . 033/0 . 009
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM 11ENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
AT I ENTI ON: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
1/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
2.01
29 . 39
2 .87
LDT1
3. 15
40 . 55
3. 12
LDT2
1 . 91
22.84
2.19
HDG
7 . 38
123.38
8.46
HDD
3.72
11.63
18.00
MC
6 .10
20.95
1 .12
ALL MODES
2.32
31.45
3.46
-------
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: ) 977 TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0 . 0 /0 .0
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0 . 1	TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM ST ARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LlfVilL 25'/. MEC1I. I RAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM I', EM EFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATIENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR	TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M I DEN r II-'ICAi ION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT	UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION	FACTORS (GM/MILE)

LDV
LDT1
LDT2
HDG
HDD
MC
ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC:
4.89
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
4.89
EXHAUST CO:
62.95
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
62.95
EXHAUST 110 X•
3.70
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
3.70


VEH
. TYPE
: LDV
LDT1 LDT2
HDG
HDD MC
CAL. YEAR:
1937 TEMP:
49.0(F)

0 . 729/0
. 077/0.046/0
.042/0
.033/0.009
REGION: 49-
STATE 22.5/22.5/22.
5 MPH
(22.5) 21
.0/ 27.0/ 21
. 0

AC: 0.90
XLOAD: 0.08
0.12
0 .14
TRAILR!
0.09 ABSHUM:
43. 00
LDGV I/I-1 PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 505£ FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.

COMPOSITE EMISSION
FACTORS
(GM/MILE)


LDV
LDT1 LDT2
HDG
HDD
MC
ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC: 2.01
3.15 1.91
7. 38
3.72
6 .10
2.32
EXHAUST CO: 29.39
40.55 22.84
123.38
11.63
20.95
31.45
EXHAUST NOX: 2.87
3.12 2.19
8.46
18. 00
1 .12
3.46

VEH. TYPE:
LDV
LDT1 LDT2
HDG
HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977
T EMP: 7 5.0(F)
1 . 000/0
.0 /0.0 /O
. 0 /o
.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-S1ATE
22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0
.0/ 0.0/ 0
.0

AC: 0.90 XLOAD:
0.08 0.12 0.14
TRAILR:
0.0 9 ABSHUM:
43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982




STRINGENCY I.I.VEL 25*
MECH.TRAINING: YES




I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS
APPLY ONLY TO MODEL
YEARS 1975 THROUGH
1987

ATTENTION: TiiE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR
TECHNOLOGY 4


I/M IDENTIFICATION
RATE HAS BEEN LEFT
UNCHANGED.



COMPOSITE EMISSION
FACTORS
(GM/MILE)


LDV
LDT1 LDT2
HDG
HDD
MC
ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC: 4.89
0.0 0.0
0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
4.89
EXHAUST CO: 62.95
0.0 0.0
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
62. 95
EXHAUST NOX: 3.70
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.70
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION-" 49-STATE 4 5.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0 ) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
-------
ATTENTION: Tll£ DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST HOX:
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDTI	LDT2	HDG	HDD
1.14 1.75	1.04	4.04	2.10
15.35 21.10	11.77	72.30	6.40
3.69 4.00	2.78	10.09	17.97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDTI LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 4 9-'. "ATE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25K MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM 3EHEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50*/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDTI	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL HC= 3.51 0 . 0	0 . 0	0 . 0	0 .0	0.0	3.51
EXHAUST CO: 33.43 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	33.43
EXHAUST NOX: 4.49 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.49
111 + 11.7370625 0.4995+ 2.85909557 0.4995+ 0.275278926 0.5009+
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDTI LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982".
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST NOX:
LDV
2 .01
29. 39
2.87
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDTI
3. 15
40 . 55
3. 12
LDT2
1. 91
22.84
2.19
HDG
7 . 38
123.38
8.46
HDD
3.72
11.63
18.00
MC
6.10
20.95
1.12
ALL MODES
2.32
31.45
3.46
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDTI LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP*. 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0 .0 /0.0
22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
0.14 TRAILR:
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LFVEL 25K MECH.1 RAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM i;fi;EFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 505£ FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
4 .89
62 . 95
3.70
LDTI
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
LDT2
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
HDG
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
HDD
0.0
0.0
0.0
MC
0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
ALL MODES
4.89
62.95
3.70
-------
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 19S7	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 9 - S TATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRATI BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
2 . 01
2 9 . 39
2.87
COMPOSITE
LDT1
3.15
40.55
3.12
EMISSION
LDT2
1.91
22.84
2.19
FACTORS
HDG
7.38
123.38
8.46
(GM/MILE)
HDD
3.72
11.63
18.00
MC
6.10
20 . 95
1 .12
ALL MODES
2.32
31.45
3.46
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977	TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1932
STRINGENCY LFVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL IIC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE	EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
4.89 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.89
62.95 0.0	T). 0	0.0	0.0	0.0	62. 95
3.70 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	3.70
VEH. TYPE: LDV L DTI LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECH . TR AINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 502 FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE	EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2 HDG HDD
1.14 1.75	1.04 4.04 2.10
15.35 ,21.10	11.77 72.30 6.40
3.69 4.00	2.78 10.09 17.97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRA IN ING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
-------
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.


COMPOSITE EMISSION
FACTORS
(GM/MILE)



LDV
LDT1 LDT2
HDG
HDD
MC ,
ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC =
3.51
0.0 0.0
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
3.51
EXHAUST CO:
33.43
0.0 0.0
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
33.43
EXHAUST NOX:
4.49
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.49
112+ 11.7370625	0.4995+ 2.85909557 0.4995+ 0.275278926 0.5009+
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1932
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH. TR AINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL ItC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
2.01
29. 39
2.87
COMPOSITE
LDT1
3.15
40.55
3. 12
EMISSION
LDT2
1.91
22.84
2.19
FACTORS
HDG
7.38
123.38
8.46
(GM/MILE)
HDD
3.72
11.63
18.00
MC
6.10
20 . 95
1.12
ALL MODES
2.32
31.45
3.46
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977	TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC:
EXHAUST CO-'
EXHAUST NOX:
COMPOSITE EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
4.89 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.89
62.95 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	62.95
3.70 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	3.70
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
CAL. YEAR: 1987
REGION: 49-STATE
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL HC: 2.01 3.15	1.91	7.38	3.72 6.10	2.32
EXHAUST CO: 29.39 40.55	22.84	123.38	11.63	20.95	31.45
EXHAUST NOX: 2.87 3.12	2.19	8.46	18.00 1.12	3.46
-------
VEH. TYPE"- LDV IDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977 TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ADSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECH . TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM UEIIEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 502 FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/t1 IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC: 4.89 0.0	0 . 0	0.0 0 . 0	0. 0	4.89
EXHAUST CO: 62.95 0.0	0.0	0.0 0.0	0.0	62.95
EXHAU5T MOX: 3.70 0.0	0.0	0.0 0.0	0.0	3.70
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937 TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: Tilr. DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV
1 .14
15. 35
3.69
LDT1
1.75
21. 10
4.00
LDT2
1 . 04
11.77
2.78
HDG
4.04
72. 30
10.09
HDD
2.10
6.40
17.97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV L DTI LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY ICVEl 25V. MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL HC: 3.51 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	3.51
EXHAUST CO: 33.43 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	33.43
EXHAUST NOX: 4.49 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.49
12 1 + 11.7370625	0.4995+ 2.85909557 0.4995+ 0.275278926 0.5009+
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1987	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR*- 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
-------
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS CGM/MILE)
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
2 . 01
29.39
2.87
LDT1
3.15
40.55
3.12
LDT2
1 . 91
22.84
2.19
IIDG
7 . 38
123.38
8.46
HDD
3.72
11.63
18. 00
MC
6.10
20 . 95
1 . 12
ALL MODES
2. 32
31 .45
3.46
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 X L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAIN ING: YES
1/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL IIC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST NOX:
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV L DTI	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC
4.89 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
62.95 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
3.70 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
ALL MODES
4.89
62. 95
3.70
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
2e.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
CAL. YEAR: 1987
REGION: 49-STAIE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL IIC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
2.01
29.39
2.87
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDT1
3.15
40.55
3.12
LDT2
1.91
22.84
2.19
HDG
7 . 38
123.38
8.46
HDD
3.72
11.63
18.00
MC	ALL MODES
6.10	2.32
20.95	31.45
1.12	3.46
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
22.5/22.5/22.5 MPH (22.5) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
0.0 9 ABSHUM: 43.0 0
AC: 0.90 X L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECH.TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM liEtlt'FITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
A1TENT ION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST NOX:
COMPOSITE EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1 LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC
4.89 0.0 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
62.95 0.0 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
3.70 0.0 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
ALL MODES
4.89
62. 95
3.70
-------
VEII. TYPE: LDV LDTI LDT2 IIDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1987	TEMP: 4 9.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 ^LOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ADSHUn: 43.00
LDGV I/M PR PC RAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECH.TRAINIHG: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY OIILY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
AT rEHTIOH: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	IIDG	HDD
1.14 1.75	1.04	4.04	2.10
15.35 21.10	11.77	72.30	6.40
3.69 4.00	2.78	10.09	17.97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977	TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 4 5.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD '• 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25;; MECH. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: TIIF DEFAULT VALUE OF 50% FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV
3.51
33.43
4.49
LDT1
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
LDT2
0.0
0.0
0.0
HDG
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
HDD
0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
MC
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
ALL MODES
3.51
33.43
4.49
12 2 + 11.7370625 0.4995+ 2.85909557 0.4995+ 0.275278926 0.500
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STA1E 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROG ['AM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25% MECH. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM LFrlEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: TI!E DEFAULT VALUE OF 505J FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD	MC ALL MODES
TOTAL HC: 1.14 1.75 1.04 4.04 2.10	4.65 1.31
EXHAUST CO: 15.35 21.10 11.77 72.30 6.40	9.93 16.74
EXHAUST NOX: 3.69 4.00 2.78 10.09 17.97	1.45 4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2	IIDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977 TEMP: 75.0(F) 1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/	0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25% MECH.TRAINING: YES
-------
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50% FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL IIC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST NOX:
LDV
3.51
33.43
4 . 4 9
COMPOSITE
LDT1
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
EMISSION
LDT2
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
FACTORS
HDG
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
(GM/MILE)
HDD
0.0
0 . 0
0.0
MC
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
ALL MODES
3.51
3 3.43
4.49
CAL. YEAR: 1927
REGION: 49-STATE
VEH. TYPE
TEMP: 4 9.0(F)
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH
: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
0.729/0.07 7/0.04 6/0.042/0.033/0.009
(45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC: 0.90 XL 0AD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILRs 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECII. TR A INI NG: YES
I/M PROGRAIl BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
AT TENT I ON: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50* FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
LDV
1 . 14
15. 35
3.69
LDT1
1 . 75
21.10
4 . 00
LDT2
1 .04
11 .77
2.78
HDG
4.04
72.30
10.09
HDD
2.10
6.40
17.97
MC
4.65
9.93
1.45
'ALL MODES
1. 31
16.74
4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LD"	"2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0 . 0 /0.0 /0.0 /O'.O /0.0
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPII (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
CAL. YEAR: 1977
REGION: 49-STATE
AC: 0.90 X L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAIl STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
AT I ENTION: IliE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.


COMPOSITE EMISSION
FACTORS
(GM/MILE)



LDV
L DTI LDT2
HDG
HDD
MC
ALL MODES
TOTAL HC:
3 . 51
0.0 0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
3.51
EXHAUST CO:
3 3.43
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.43
EXHAUST NOX:
4.49
0.0 0.0
0 . 0
0.0
0.0
4.49
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1937	TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
REGION: 49-STATE 4 5.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
AC" 0.90 a 1.0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25* MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/ll PROGRAM BENEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV
1 .14
15.35
3.69
LDT1
1.75
21.10
4.00
LDT2
1.04
11.77
2.78
HDG
4 . 04
72. 30
10.09
HDD
2.10
6.40
17 . 97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
-------
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977	TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 4 9-STATE 4 5.0/45.0/45,0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 X L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSIIUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25'/. MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BE;!EFIT5 APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50% FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL HC:
EXHAUST CO:
EXHAUST NOX:
COMPOSITE EMISSION FACTORS (GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD	MC	ALL MODES
3.51 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	0.0	3.51
3 3.43 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	0.0	33.43
4.49 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	0.0	4.49
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
TEMP: 49.0(F)	0.729/0.077/0.046/0.042/0.033/0.009
45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 21.0/ 27.0/ 21.0
CAL. YEAR: 1937
REGION: 49-STATE
0.09 ABSHUM: 43.00
AC: 0.90 X L 0 A D: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR:
LDGV I/M PROGRAM 5TARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVFl 25*/. MECH . TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM BEIIEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL"YEARS 1975 THROUGH 1987
ATTENTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50J£ FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
TOTAL IIC
EXHAUST CO
EXHAUST NOX
COMPOSITE	EMISSION FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2 HDG	HDD
1.14 1.75	1.04 4.04	2.10
15.35 21.10	11.77 72.30	6.40
3.69 4.00	2.78 10.09	17.97
MC	ALL MODES
4.65	1.31
9.93	16.74
1.45	4.22
VEH. TYPE: LDV LDT1 LDT2 HDG HDD MC
CAL. YEAR: 1977	TEMP: 75.0(F)	1.000/0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0 /0.0
REGION: 49-STATE 45.0/45.0/45.0 MPH (45.0) 0.0/ 0.0/ 0.0
AC: 0.90 XLOAD: 0.08 0.12 0.14 TRAILR: 0.09 ABSNUM: 43.00
LDGV I/M PROGRAM STARTING IN 1982
STRINGENCY LEVEL 25*/. MECII. TRAINING: YES
I/M PROGRAM REIIEFITS APPLY ONLY TO MODEL YEAR5 1975 THROUGH 1987
AITEHTION: THE DEFAULT VALUE OF 50'/. FOR TECHNOLOGY 4
I/M IDENTIFICATION RATE HAS BEEN LEFT UNCHANGED.
COMPOSITE	EMISSION	FACTORS	(GM/MILE)
LDV LDT1	LDT2	HDG	HDD	MC	ALL MODES
TOTAL IIC: 3.51 0.0	0 . 0	0 . 0	0 . 0	0.0	3.51
EXHAUST CO: 33.43 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	33.43
EXHAUST NOX: 4.49 0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.49
-------
SUMMARY OF HOURLY INPUT DATA:
HOUR W DIR SPEED HEIGHT STAB TEMP HOT COLD 	LINK VOL
CDEG) (M/S) (M) CLAS (DEG)
START
START
1
2 3
4
5 6
1 ISO. 2.00 60. 6 49.
27.0
21.0
670. 1030
. 1000.
1230.
0. 0.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SUMMARY'






INS PH APP LNK + SIG NQND LANE VOL
CAP
GAP CY
G +
DELAY
QUEUE(V)
QUEUECDIS)
1 1 I 1 + 1 0 335.0
2800.
0. 39.
15. +
9.8
3.0
23.8
112 2+1 0 515.0
2700.
0. 39.
15. +
12.4
5.2
41.5
1 2 1 3 + 1 0 500.0
2400.
0. 39.
18. +
10.0
4.5
36.3
1 2 2 4 + 1 0 615.0
2800.
0. 39.
18. +
9.9
5.5
44.4
-------
PSEUUOLINK EMISSION RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY:
+	LI UK
INS Pll APP i	DIST
+ (ID
* + + t+t+++++4+ + + + + h
+
1 1 1 +	8 3.4
1 1 2 +	61.5
1 2 1 +	51'. 2
1 2 2 +	7 4 .4
AC DC
(G/M-S)
002923
005106
CRUISE
(G/M-S)
000992
001733
004468 0.001517
005458 0.001853
—EXCESS EMISSIONS	
TOTAL DIS RATE
(G/S) (M)(G/M-S)
0.7340	380.2 0.0019
1.2824	380.2	0.0034
1.1222	380.2	0.0030
1.3708	380.2	0.0036
IDLE EMISSIONS	
TOTAL DIS RATE
(G/S) (M)(G/M-S)
.3502	23.8	0.0147
.6802	41.5	0.0164
.5322	36.3	0.0147
.6519	44.4	0.0147
-I'SEUDOL INK	+ LINK
DIST	RATE NUM + AND
(M) (G/M-S)	+ LANE
40 . 0
41.5
4 0 . 0
44 .4
EMISSION RATE
(G/M-S)
02711
04728
04136
04559
+
9 +
10	+
11	+
12	+
-------
HOUR 1 ORIGINAL HIUAY CONTRIBUTIONS PRIOR TO REPLACEMENT
RECEPTOR	CONTRIBUTION FROM LINK	 xxxxTOTAL***
NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 MG/M**3 PPM
1	0.43 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.00 4.60 0.06 6.33 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.40
HOUR 1 FINAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND CONCENTRATIONS
RECEPTOR	CONTRIBUTION FROM LINK		xxxxTOTAL***
NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22	MG/MXX3 PPM
1	0.43 0.C0 0.82 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.09 0.00 4.60 0.06 6.33 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	12.40 10.790
	i	
-------
APPENDIX E
ADDITIONAL HOT SPOT ANALYSIS
-------
APPENDIX E
In addition to the air quality analyses for three monitoring sites,
26 other intersections were analyzed for possible violation of the CO
standards. These intersections to be analyzed were selected by the City
of Charlotte, Department of Transportation on the basis of traffic vol-
umes.
These intersections were first analyzed for 1983 conditions with
the benefits of I&M programs. Those intersections with 1983 projected
air quality substantially higher than the standards were analyzed for
1987 conditions. The results are summarized in Table E.1, and the traf-
fic parameters for these intersections used in the analysis are given
in this Appendix.
The results indicate possible violation of the CO standard in 1987
at three sites as listed below.
1.	Albemarle-Sharon Amity
2.	Independence-Sharon Amity
3.	Idlewild-Independence
-------
TABLE E.1
PROJECTED AIR QUALITY3
8-Hour CO (mg/m3)
Site Description	1983	1987
(Intersection Number)	With I&M	With I&M
1.
Albemarle-Sharon Amity (444)
15.2
10.4
2.
Eastway-Monroe (474)
9. 1
	
3.
Central-Kilborne (458)
11.0
	
4.
Rama-Sardis (494)
9.1
	
5.
Providence-Queens (506)
4.9
	
6.
Providence-Sharon Amity (509)
9.0
	
7.
Fairview-Park (657)
7.3
	
8.
Providence-Wendover (508)
9.9
	
9.
Independence-Sharon Amity (446)
15.6
10.8
10.
Fairview-Providence (510)
10.5
	
11.
Central-Eastway (457)
11.6
	
12.
Sugar Creek-Tryon (212)
5.4
	
13.
Tryon-Orr (283)
3.8
	
14.
Idlewild-Lawyers (553)
2.4
	
15.
Archdale-South Boulevard (628)
8.8
	
16.
South Boulevard-Tyvola (625)
8.4
	
17.
Graham-I-85 (262)
8.4
	
18.
La salle-I-77 (901)
5. 1
	
19.
Independence-Seventh (414)
6.5
	
20.
Brookshire-I-85 (875)
4.7
	
21.
I-85-Sugar Creek (229)
10.4
	
22.
Hawthorne-Independence (421)
8. 1
	
23.
Central-Hawthorne (422)
4.5
	
24.
Freedom-Ashley (852)
2.3
	
25.
Idlewild-Independence (448)
15.9
11.2
26.
Beatties Ford-Rozzelles
Ferry (813)
12. 1
	
a Includes background of 1.5 mg/m3 and 2.0 mg/m3 for 1987 and 1983, re-
spectively.
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK
MODEL

Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Albemarle/Sharon Amity
(444);
X= 0.141
Km; Y=
0.132 Km
Phasing: 5-phase
full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
IKS.A. )
E(Albe.) S(S.A. )
W(Albe.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.142
0.228
0.141
0.050
Km
Beg.Y
0.245
0.180
0.023
0.092
Km
End X
0.136
0.157
0.146
0.124
Km
End Y
0.150
0.147
0.114
0.117
Km
Width
7
7.5
6.5
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
3000
2800
3000

Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m« p. h.
Volume
840
830
1140
920
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.147
0.156
.0.135
0.121
Km
Beg.Y
0.152
0.134
0.114
0.130
Km
End X
0.154
0.232
0.131
0.046
Km
End Y
0.250
0.170
0.018
0.093
Km
Width
6
7.5
7
8
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
990
1100
970
660
veh/hr.
Receptor Location





X

0.199


Km
Y

0.184


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period:
Intersection: Independence/Sharon Amity (446) X= 0.092
Phasing: 8-phase full actuated
Link
11:00 - 19:00
Km; Y= 0.105 Km
Parameter
NUL. Ju_L
E(IndeD)
SCS. A.)
W(IndeD)
Units
Approach Link:



Beg.X
0.157
0.191
0.038
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.203
0.000
0.009
0.202
Km
End X
0.100
0.110
0.082
0.072
Km
End Y
0.132
0.100
0.079
0.111
Km
Width
8
12
8
12
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Capacity
3100
4600
3100
4600

Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
740
1400
740
1430
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.110
0.110
0.071
0.072
Km
Beg. Y
0.124
0.084
0.086
0.128
Km
End X
0.175
0.160
0.022
0.021
Km
End Y
0.202
0.002
0.010
0.212
Km
Width
7
12
7
12
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
960
1590
660
1100
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.084

Km
Y


0.052

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK
MODEL

Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Idlewild/Independence
(448)
X= 0.552
Km; Y=
0.130 Km
Phasing: 7-phase,
full actuated




(Link)

Link


Parameter
N(IndeD)
E(Idlwd)
S(IndeD)
W(Idwld)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg. X
01446
0.655
0.663
0.102
Km
Beg. Y
0.203
0.142
0.055
0.081
Km
End X
0.529
0.579
0.579
0.532
Km
End Y
0.138
0.135
0.123
0.124
Km
Width
11
6
11
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
2
3
2
#
Capacity
6000
2800
4500
2900
veh/hr.(Level E)
Speed Limit
45
35
45
35
m.p.h. 4
Volume
1520
430
1160
600
veh/hr.
Exit Link:
Beg. X
Beg. Y
End X
End Y
Width
# of Lanes
Speed Limit
Volume
Receptor Location:
X
Y
Z
0.552
0.145
0.456
0.223
11
3
45
1320
0.587
0.129
0.655
0.136
4
1
35
540
0.552
0.119
0.652
0.038
12
3
45
1430
0.522
0.132
0.092
0.087
4
1
35
430
0.475
0.152
Km
Km
Km
Km
Meters
#
m. p. h.
veh/hr.
Km
Km
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Eastway/Monroe/Wendover
(474)
; X= 0.124
Km; Y=
0.101 Km
Phasing: 7-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(East.)
E(Mon.
) S(Wend.)
W(Mon. )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.121
0.220
0.115
0.018
Km
Beg. Y
0.204
0.105
0.002
0.097
Km
End X
0.118
0.139
0.127
0.106
Km
End Y
0.115
0.106
0.086
0.096
Km
Width
9
8
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
3100
3100
3000
3000

Speed Limit
45
45
35
45
m. p. h.
Volume
840
770
750
910
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.131
0.139
.0.117
0.107
Km
Beg. Y
0.115
0.095
0.088
0.107
Km
End X
0.134
0.220
0.105
0.018
Km
End Y
0.204
0.094
0.002
0.106
Km
Width
9
7
6
8
Meters
0 of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
45
45
35
45
m. p. h.
Volume
940
980
680
670
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.178


Km
Y

0.118


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Central/Kilborne/Norland (458)
; X= 0.132
Km; Y=
0.090 Km
Phasing: 7-phase full
actuated




(Link)



Link


Parameter

N(Kilb.)
EfCent.
) S(Norl.)
W(Cent.)
Units
Approach Link:






Beg.X

0.196
0.260
0.060
0.001
Km
Beg. Y

0.195
0.049
0.001
0.141
Km
End X

0.140
0.147
0.128
0.113
Km
End Y

0.107
0.088
0.076
0.091
Km
Width

3
6
3
6
Meters
# of Lanes

1
2
1
2
#
Capacity

1400
2800
1400
2800

Speed Limit

35
40
35
40
m. p. h«
Volume

380
860
250
980
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.148
0.140
.0.121
0.119
Km
Beg. Y

0.104
0.079
0.079
0.100
Km
End X

0.200
0.264
0.058
0.014
Km
End Y

0.200
0.039
0.007
0.146
Km
Width

4
6
4
6
Meters
# of Lanes

1
2
1
2
#
Speed Limit

35
40
35
40
d. p. h«
Volume

390
1160
180
730
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X




0.084
Km
Y




0.090
Km
Z




3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time
Period
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Rama/Sardis
Data (494)
•
I
X:
= 0.111
Km; Y=
0.090 Km
Phasing: 5-phase full actuated





(Link)

Link



Parameter
N(Rama.)
E(Sard.)
SL
1
W(Sard.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.163
0.190


0.013
Em
Beg. Y
0.198
0.043


0.142
Em
End X
0.112
0.122


0.094
Km
End Y
0.102
0.086


0.094
Km
Width
6
3


3
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1

0
1
#
Capacity
2800
1400

0
1400

Speed Limit
35
45

0
45
m. p. h.
Volume
380
350

0
780
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X
0.117
0.120

0.-105
0.100
Km
Beg.Y
0.099
0.079

0.082
0.100
Km
End X
0.167
0.188

0.066
0.016
Km
End Y
0.194
0.039

0.021
0.148
Km
Width
3
4

7
3
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1

2
1
#
Speed Limit
35
45

25
45
m.p.h.
Volume
450
500

60
520
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X




0.046
Km
Y




0.102
Km
-------
p, - -f.
	'L.J
APH lb 15381
f.-:.; ¦	1
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL 	
Intersection: Providence/Queens (506)
Phasing: 5-phase full actuated
(Link)
Parameter
Approach Link:
¦ -j -•'•Time Period:
X= 0.120
10:00 - 18:00
Km;Y= 0.096 Km
Link
NfProv.) E(Prov.) S(Quen.) W(Quen.)
Beg.X
0.149
0.192
0.093
0.045
Beg. Y
0.200
0.000
0.000
0.140
End X
0.117
0.136
0.115
0.099
End Y
0.115
0.084
0.068
0.099
Width
4
6.5
6
6.5
# of Lanes
1
2
2
2
Capacity
1500
2800
2800
2800
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
Volume
810
700
540
630
; Link:




Beg.X
0.125
0.130
0.100
0.106
Beg. Y
0.108
0.078
0.072
0.111
End X
0.154
0.185
0.075
0.055
End Y
0.200
0.000
0.000
0.150
Width
6.5
7
6.5
6
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
Volume
760
850
600
460
sptor Location:




X
0.111



Y
0.149



Units
Km
Km
Km
Km
Meters
#
m.p.h.
veh/hr.
Km
Km
Km
Km
Meters
#
m. p. h.
veh/hr.
Km
Km
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 10:30
- 18:30
Intersection: Providence/Sharon Amity
(509)
X= 0.115
Km;Y=
0.121 Km
Phasing: 8-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(S.A. )
E(Prov.
) S(Shar.)
W(Prov.)
Onits
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.250
0.185
0.000
0.044
Km
Beg. Y
0.177
0.000
0.055
0.221
Km
End X
0.127
0.128
0.104
0.103
Km
End Y
0.132
0.111
0.111
0.131
Km
Width
6
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
2800
3000
3000
3000

Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
710
550
650
800
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.131
0.118
0.100
0.113
Km
Beg. Y
0.123
0.106
0.120
0.136
Km
End X
0.250
0.173
0.000
0.048
Km
End Y
0.170
0.000
0.062
0.235
Km
Width
5
7
6
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
790
750
580
590
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.155


Km
Y

0.092


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Fairview/Park
(657)

X= 0.106
Km; Y=
0.114 Km
Phasing: 4-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Drwv.)
EfFair.
) S(Park )
W(Park.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.112
0.222
0.099
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.159
0.114
0.000
0.105
Km
End 2
0.102
0.120
0.107
0.093
Km
End Y
0.130
0.120
0.101
0.111
Km
Width
7
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
3000
3000
3000

Speed Limit
25
35
45
35
m. p. h.
Volume
90
1080
620
1320
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.109
0.120
0.100
0.094
Km
Beg. Y
0.129
0.110
0.100
0.122
Km
End X
0.118
0.223
0.095
0.000
Km
End Y
0.157
0.106
0.000
0.116
Km
Width
4
7
3
6
Meters
$ of Lanes
1
2
1
2
#
Speed Limit
25
35
45
35
m. p. h.
Volume
60
1340
580
1120
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.056
Km
Y



0.086
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Providence/Wendover
(508)
X= 0.080
Km; Y=
0.087 Km
Phasing: 5-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
NfWend.
) E(Prov.
.) S(Wend.)
W(Prov.)
Onits
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.183
0.188
0.000
0.007
Km
Beg. Y
0.201
0.000
0.009
0.201
Km
End X
0.087
0.094
0.071
0.066
Km
End Y
0.102
0.081
0.074
0.094
Km
Width
7
7
7.5
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
3000
3100.
3000

Speed Limit
35
40
35
40
m. p. h.
Volume
530
1040
640
940
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.094
0.085
0.065
0.074
Km
Beg.Y
0.094
0.073
0.083
0.102
Km
End X
0.193
0.171
0.000
0.019
Km
End Y
0.202
0.000
0.025
0.201
Km
Width
7
7
7.5
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
40
35
40
m. p. h.
Volume
640
850
550
1120
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.120


Km
Y

0.077


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period:
Intersection: Fairview/Providence/Sardis (510) X= 0.109
Phasing: 8-phase full actuated
11:00 - 19:00
Km;Y= 0.095 Km
Parameter
N(Prov.)
E(Sard.
) S(Prov.)
W(Fair.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.006
0.158
0.199
0.070
Km
Beg.Y
0.201
0.201
0.000
0.000
Km
End X
0.087.
0.115
0.124
0.103
Km
End Y
0.109
0.116
0.086
0.068
Km
Width
7
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
f
Capacity
3000
3000
3000
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
740
680
510
1050
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.094
0.125
0.119
0.094
Km
Beg.Y
0.117
0.109
0.075
0.074
Km
End X
0.013
0.171
0.186
0.057
Km
End Y
0.201
0.201
0.000
0.000
Km
Width
7
7
7
6
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
45
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
540
820
840
780
veh/hr
Receptor Location:





X



0.148
Km
Y



0.076
Km
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Central/Eastway (457)

X= 0.133
Km; Y=
0.117 Km
Phasing: 8-^-phase full
actuated




(Link)



Link


Parameter

N(Ewav.)
E( Cent.
) SfEwav.)
W(Cent.)
Units
Approach Link:






Beg.X

0.153
0.258
0.113
0.000
Km
Beg. Y

0.247
0.094
0.000
0.146
Km
End X

0.129
0.149
0.136
0.114
Km
End Y

0.134
0.118
0.098
0.115
Km
Width

7
7
8
7
Meters
# of Lanes

2
2
2
2
$
Capacity

3000
3000
3100
3000

Speed Limit

45
40
45
40
m.p.h.
Volume

950
780
1020
990
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.142
0.148
0.123
0.116
Km
Beg.Y

0.131,
0.106
0.102
0.127
Km
End X

0.163
0.256
0.102
0.000
Km
End Y

0.245
0.079
0.000
0.156
Km
Width

7
7
8
7
Meters
# of Lanes

2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit

45
40
45
40
m.p.h.
Volume

980
980
1000
790
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X




0.074
Km
Y




0.115
Km
Z




3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Sugar
Creek/Tryon (212)

X= 0.109
Km;Y=
0.138 Km
Phasing: 8-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter

NfS. C.)
E(Trvon)
S(S. c.)
W(Trvon)
Units
Approach Link:




Beg.X

0.091
0.250
0.139
0.012
Km
Beg. Y

0.266
0.158
0.000
0.086
Km
End X

0.101
0.127
0.119
0.086
Km
End Y

0.159
0.150
0.120
0.124
Km
Width

7
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes

2
2
2
2
#
Capacity

3000
3000
3000
3000

Speed Limit

45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume

1060
980
910
1100
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.112
0.130
0.108
0.082
Km
Beg. Y

0.160
0.137
0.118
0.136
Km
End X

0.102
0.250
0.128
0.010
Km .
End Y

0.268
0.147
0.000
0.098
Km
Width

7
11
7
7
Meters
$ of Lanes

2
3
2
2
#
Speed Limit

45
45
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume

1010
1230
880
930
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X

0.102



Km
Y

0.144



Km
Z

3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Orr/Tryon
Phasing: Not signalized
(Link)
Parameter
Approach Link:
Beg.X'
Beg.Y
End I .
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Capacity
Speed Limit
Volume
Exit Link:
Beg.X
Beg.Y
End X
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Speed Limit
Volume
Receptor Location:
X
Y
Z
Time Period: 11:00 - 19s00
(283);	X= 0.124 Km;Y= 0.120 Km
Link
N(Trvon)	E( Orr	S(Trvon) ML =. 1.	Units
0.175	0.231	0.058	Km
0.250	0.057	0.005	Km
0.123	0.136	0.125	Km
0.129	0.117	0.114	Km
7	4	7	Meters
2	1	2	#
3000	1500	3000
45	35	45	m.p.h.
880	90	950	veh/hr.
0.131	0.134	0.117	Km
0.125	0.113	0.118	Km
0.180	0.226	0.048	Km
0.241	0.055	0.002	Km
7	4	7	Meters
2	12	#
45	35	45	m.p.h.
990	110	880	veh/hr.
0.172
0.100
3
Km
Km
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Idlewild North/Lawyers
Phasing: Not signalized
Time Period: 11:00 - 19:00
(553); X= 0.137 Km;Y= 0.102 Km
Link
Parameter
Nf - ) EfLawv.)
Sddle.)
WfLawv.)
Units
Approach Link:




Beg.X
0.234
0.082
0.002
Km
Beg. Y
0.045
0.009
0.192
Km
End X
0.146
0.138
0.126
Km
End
0.101
0.093
0.104
Km
Width
5
4
5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
1
#
Capacity
1600
1500
1600

Speed Limit
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
410
90
560
veh/hr.
Exit Link:




Beg.X
0.142
0.133
0.130
Km
Beg. I
0.095
0.095
0.109
Km
End X
0.233
0.076
0.009
Km
End Y
0.043
0.007
0.200
Km
Width
5
4
5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
1
#
Speed Limit
45
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
590
100
380
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:




X


0.137
Km
Y


0.065
Km
Z


3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Archdale/South Blvd.(628);
X= 0.264
Km;Y=
0.103 Km
Phasing: 6-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(South)
E(Arch.
) S(South)
W( Arch.')
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.252
0.400
0.27.5
0.132
Km
Beg.Y
0.276
0.116
0.000
0.114
Km
End X
0.258
0.278
0.271
0.250
Km
End Y
0.115
0.111
0.090
0.098
Km
Width
7
4
7.5
3.5
Meters
$ of Lanes
2
1
2
1
#
Capacity
3000
1500
3000.
1500
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
45
35
m.p. h.
Volume
780
350
780
430
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.269
0.280
0.259
0.250
Km
Beg.Y
0.116
0.098
0.090
0.105
Km
End X
0.263
0.400
0.266
0.134
Km
End Y
0.236
0.103
0.000
0.121
Km
Width
7
6
7
5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
1
#
Speed Limit
45
35
45
35
m. p. h.
Volume
780
420
760
380
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.214
• Km
Y



0.085
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
alA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL ,
*s. /fV-
Intersection: Archdale/6ld Pineville (629)
Time Period:
X= 0.123
11:00
Km;Y=
- 19:00
0.118 Km
Phasing: 2-phase, full
actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(O.P. )
E(Arch.) S(0.P. )
W( Arch.)
Dnits
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.133
0.250
0.109
0.000
Kin
Beg. Y
0.250
0.105
0.000
0.126
Km
End X
0.120
0.134
0.125
0.112
Km
End Y
0.130
0.121
0.106
0.113
Km
Width
3.5
3.5
4.5
3
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
1
1
#
Capacity
1500
1500
1600
1400
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
- 45-
35
m.p.h.
Volume
350.
370
260
370
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.128
0.132
0.116
""0.112
Km
Beg.Y
0.130
0. *;14
D.106
0.125
Km
End X
0.144
0.150
0.103
0.000
Km
End Y
0.250
0.098
0.000
0.132
Km
Width
5
4
4
5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
1
1
#
Speed Limit
45
35
45
35
m.p.h.
Volume
280
430
280
350
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:
X




Km
Y
z
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 10:30
- 18:30
Intersection: South Blvd./Tyvola (625);
X= 0.273
Km; Y=
.0.091 Km
Phasing: 8-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(S.Blv)
EfTvvl.
) S(S.Blv)
WfTwl.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.256
0.387
0.287
0.138
Km
Beg.Y
0.226
0.065
0.000
0.115
Km
End X
0.266
0.287
0.281
0.256
Km
End Y
0.107
0.092
0.072
0.088
Km
Width
7
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
3000
3000
3000-
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
45
45
m. p. h:
Volume
880
690
860
800
veh/hr.
Exit. Link:





Beg.X
0.277
0.288
0;269
0.257
Km
Beg.Y
0.109
0.078
0.072
0.101
Km
End X
0.263
0.380
0.277
0.136
Km
End Y
0.226
0.055
0.000
0.129
Km
Width
7
7
7
7
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
45.
35
45
45
m. p. h.
Volume
800
670
980
810
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.221
Km
Y



0.078
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 1:1:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Old Pineville/Tyvola (626);
X= 0.123
Km;Y=
0.128 Km
Phasing: 2-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
NfO.P. )
E(Twl.
) SfO.P. )
W( Twl.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.098
0.257
0.144
0.000
Km
Beg.Y
0.250
0.101
0.000
0.126
Km
End X
0.117
0.136
0.134
0.114
Km
End Y
0.143
0.129
0.106
0.120
Km
Width
4
7
4
7
Meters
$ of Lanes
1
2
1
2
#
Capacity
1500
3000
1500
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
40
45
40
45
m.p.h.
Volume
340
770
330
860
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.125
0.138
0.125
0.109
Km
Beg.Y
0.144
0.115
0.104
0.134
Km
End X
0.103
0.256
0.140
0.000
Km
End Y
0.250
0.088
0.000
0.138
Km
Width
4
7
5
7
Meters
# of Lanes
1
2
1
2
#
Speed Limit
40
45
40
45
m.p.h.
Volume
260
840
350
840
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.221


Km
Y

0.078


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
10:00 - 18:00
Intersection: Graham/I-85 S.Ramp(262)
•
»
x= 0.092
Km;Y= 0.116 Km
Phasing: 3-phase-full actuated



(Link)


Link

Parameter
N(Grah.)
E(1-85
) S(Grah.) W(
) Units
Approach Link:




Beg.X
0.232
0.187
0.002
Km
Beg.Y
0.321
0.097
0.000
Km
End X
0.091
0.098
0.071
Km
End Y
0.129
0.114
0.096
Km
Width
6
6.5
3
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
1
tf
Capacity
2800
2900
1400
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume
360
330
590
veh/hr.
Exit Link:




Beg.X
0.096
0.096
0.068
Km
Beg.Y
0.126
0.107
0.099
Km
End X
0.236
0.187
0.000
Km
End Y
0. 3*19
0.091
0.008
Km
Width
3
3.5
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
2
0
Speed Limit
45
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume
580
200
420
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:




X


0.076
Km
Y


0.075
Km
Z


3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
10:00 - 18:00
Intersection: Graham/I-85 N.Ramp(263)
•
1
X= 0.243
Km;Y= 0.331 Km
Phasing: 3-phase-full actuated



(Link)


Link

Parameter
N(Grah.)
Ef 1-8*5
) SfGrah.l W(
) Units
Approach Link:




Beg.X
0.304
0.322
0.096
Km
Beg.Y
0.422
0.298
0.126
Km
End X
0.247
0.257
0.236
Km
End Y
0.345
0.332
0.319
Km
Width
3
4
3
Meters
# of Lanes
1
1
1
#
Capacity
1400
1500
1400
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
i 45
m.p.h.
Volume
240
110
460
veh/hr.
Exit Link:




Beg.X
0.252
0.249
0.232
Km
Beg.Y
0.341
0.319
¦0.321
Km
End X
0.306
0.325
0.091
Km
End Y
0.411
0.294
0.129
Km
Width
6
4
6
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
t
Speed Limit
45
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume
300
180
270
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:




X



Km
Y
Z
Km
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: LaSalle/I-77/E.Ramp (900)
Phasing: Not signalized
(Link)
Time Period: 11:00 - 19:00
X= 0.245 Km;Y= 0.-142 Km
Link
Approach Link:
Beg.X
Beg. Y
End I
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Capacity
Speed Limit
Volume
Exit Link:
Beg.X
Beg.Y
End X
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Speed Limit
Volume
Receptor Location:
X
Y
Z
N(E.Rmp)
E(LaSal)
S(E.RmD)
W(LaSal)
Units
0.206
0.383
0.214
0.078
Km
0.238
0.139
0.033
0.138
Km
0.250
0.244
0.251
0.227
Km
0.153
0.148
0.127
0.136
Km
0
8
4
7.5
Meters
0
2
2
2
#
0
3100

3000
veh/hr.(Level
0
35
v 35
35
m.p.h..
0
400
340
280
veh/hr.
0.250
0.245
0.251
0.228
Km
0.153
0.136
0.127
0.149
Km
0.206
0.383
0.214
0.074
Km
0.238
0.132
0.033
0.150
Km
6
7.5
4
8
Meters
1
2
0
2
#
35
35
0
35
m.p•h.
70
390
0
560
veh/hr.


0.254

Km


0.100

Km


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: LaSalle/I-
Phasing: Not signalized
(Link)
Parameter
Approach Link:
Beg.X
Beg.Y
End X
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Capacity
Speed Limit
Volume
Exit Link:
Beg.X
Beg.Y .
End X
End Y
Width
#	of Lanes
Speed Limit
Volume
Receptor Location:
X
Y
Z


Time Period;
11:00
- 19:00
W.Ramp (901)
X= 0.064
Km;Y=
0.143 Km


Link


lf(WfRmp)
E(LaSal) S(W.Rmp)
WfLaSal)
Units
0.065
0.228
0.085
0.000
Km
0.235
0.149
0.000
0.145
Km
0.067
0.074
0.069
0.053
Km
0.161
0.150
0.122
0.139
Km
7
7
5
7
Meters
2
2
0
2
#
3000
3000
0
3000
veh/hr.(Level
35
35
o
35
m.p.h.
60
500
0
320
veh/hr.
0.067
0.078
0.069
0.049
Km
0.161
0.138
0.122
0.150
Km
0.065
0.227
0.085
0.000
Km
0.235
0.136
0.000
0.153
Km
7
7
5
6
Meters
0
2
1
2
#
0
35
35
35
m.p.h.
0
240
250
390
veh/hr.



0.254
Km



0.100
Km



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 10:00 - 16:00
Intersection: Independence/Seventh (414).;	X= 0.103 Km;Y= 0.100 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle = 90s; Indep.-65, Seventh-25)
(Link)		Link
Parameter
Nflnd. )
E(7th 1
S(Ind. )
W(7th .
) Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.125
0.198
0.088
0.002
Km
Beg.Y
0.206
0.076
0.007
0.126
Km
End X
0.100
0.121
0.105
0.086
Km
End Y
0.115
0.098
0.087
0.102
Km
Width
13
5
7
5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
2
2
2
#
Capacity
4600
1800
3000
1800
veh/hr.(Level E)
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
740
340
980
260
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X.
0.115
0.120
0.094 •
0.089
Km
Beg.Y
0.111
0.093
0.090
0.107
Km
End X
0.198
0.197
0.076
0.004
. Km
End Y
0.185
0.071
0.011
0.131
Km
Width
8
5
10
5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
3
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
860
300
880
290
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.116

Km
Y


0.065

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL Time Period:	16:00 - 16:30
Intersection: Independence/Seventh (414); X= 0.103	Km;Y= 0.100 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle=100s; Indep.-50,	Seventh-50)
Link
Parameter

Nflnd. )
E(7th 1
S(Ind. )
W(7th 1
Units
Approach Link:






Beg.X

0.125
0.198
0.088
0.002
Km
Beg. Y

0.206
0.076
0.007
0.126
Km
End X

0.100
0.121
0.105
0.086
Km
End Y

0.115
0.098
0.087
0.102
Km
Width

13
5
7
5
Meters
'# of Lanes

3
2
2
2
#
Capacity

4600 '
1800
3000
1800
\'
Veh/hr.. CLevel
Speed Limit

35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume

590
370
1240
340
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.115
0.120
0.094
0.089
Km
Beg. Y

0.111
0.093
0.090
0.107
Km
End X

0.198
0.197
0.076
0.004
Km
End Y

0.185
0.071
0.011
0.131
Km
Width

8
5
10
5
Meters
$ of Lanes

2
2
3
2
#
Speed Limit

35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume

1040
430
720
360
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X
«


0.116

Km
Y



0.065

Km
Z



3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Independence/Seventh (414);
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle = 105s
Time Period: 16:30 - 17:00
X= 0.103 Km;Y= 0.100 Km
; Indep.-53, Seventh-52 )
Link
Parameter
N(Ind. )
E(7th )
S(Ind. )
W(7th 1
Unit3
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.125
0.198
0.088
0.002
Km
Beg. Y
0.206
0.076
0.007
0.126
Km
End X
0.100
0.121
0.105
0.086
Km
End Y
0.115
0.098
0.087
0.102
Km
Width
13
5
7
5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
2
2
2
#
Capacity
. 4600
1800
3000
1800
Veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
630
320
1790
480
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.115
0.120
0.094
0.089
Km
Beg. Y
0.111
0.093
0.090
0.107
Km
End X
0.198
0.197
0.076
0.004
Km
End Y
0.185
0.071
0.011
0.131
Km
Width
8
5
10
5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
3
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
1540
620
720
330
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.116

Km
Y


0.065

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Tine Period:. 17:00 - 17:30
Intersection: Independence/Seventh (414);	X= 0.103 Km;Y= 0.100 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle=l45, Indep.-73» Seventh-72)
Link
Parameter
N(Ind. )
E(7th )
Sflnd. )
W(7th V
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.125
0.198
0.088
0.002
Km
Beg. Y
0.206
0.076
0.007
0.126
Km
End X
0.100
0.121
0.105
0.086
Km
End Y
0.115
0.098
0.087
0.102
Km
Width
13
5
¦7
5
Meters
# of Lanes.
3
2
2
2
#
Capacity
4600
1800
3000
.1800
Veh/hr.(Level E)
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
510 "
330
2220
970
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.115
0.120
0.094
0.089
Km
Beg. Y
0.111
0.093
0.090
0.107
Km
End X
0.198
0.197
0.076
0.004
Km
End Y
0.185
0.071
0.011
0.131
Km
Width
8
5
10
5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
3
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
2050
1030
570
380
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.116

Km
Y


0.065

Km
. Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL.
Intersection: Independence/Seventh (414);
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle -100;
Time Period: 17:30 - 18:00
X= 0.103 Km;Y= 0.100 Km
Indep.-50, Seventh-50)
Link
Parameter
Ntlnd. )
E(7th 1
S(Ind. )
W(7th 1
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.125
0.198
0.088
0.002 .
Km
Beg. Y
0.206
0.076
0.007
0.126
Km
End X
0.100
0.121
0.105
0.086
Km
End Y
0.115
0.098
0.087
0.102
Km
Width
13
5
7
5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
2
2
2
#
Capacity
4600
1800
3000
1800
Veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
600
310
1680
820
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.115
0.120
0.094
0.089
Km
Beg. Y
0.111
0.093
0.090
0.107
Km
End X
0.198
0.197
0.076
o.oon
Km
End Y .
0.185
0.071
0.011
0.131
Km
Width
8
5
10
5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
3
2

Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
1530
900
710
260
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.116

Km
Y


0.065

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Brookshire/I-85 E.Ramp (875)
X= 0.235
Km; Y=
0.086 Km
Phasing: 4-phase full
actuated




(Link)



Link


Parameter

N(E.RmD)
E(Brksh) S(E.RmD)
W(Brksh)
Units
Approach Link:






Beg.X

0.239
0.370
0.196
0.137
Km
Beg.Y

0.213
0.058
0.020
0.110
Km
End X

0.241
0.246
0.231
0.216
Km
End Y

0.112
0.091
0.075
0.087
Km
Width

6
7
7.5
7
Meters
t of Lanes


2
2
2
#
Capacity


3000
3000
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit


45
* 35
45
m. p. h.
Volume


970
610
830
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.241
0.246
0.231
0.225 .
Km
Beg.Y

0.112
0.081
0.075
0.096
Km
End X

0.239
0.360
0.196
0.141
Km
End Y

0.213
0.051
0.020
0.119
Km
Width

6
10
7.5
7
Meters
# of Lanes

1
3

2
#
Speed Limit

35
45

45
m.p.h.
Volume

200
1030
0
1100
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X



0.070

Km
Y



0.107

Km
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Brookshire/I-85 W.Ramp (899)
X= 0.122
Km; Y=
0.120 Km
Phasing: 4-phase full actuated




(Link)

Link


Parameter
NfW.RmD)
E(Brksh)
S(W.RmD)
W( Brksh)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.184
0.225
0.120
0.000
Km
Beg.Y
0.215
0.096
0.000
0.152
Km
End X
0.126
0.141
0.119
0.103
Km
End Y
0.132
0.119
0.105
0.118
Km
Width
7.5
7
5-5
7.5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
0
2
#
Capacity
3000
3000
o
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
45
o
45
m. p. h.
Volume
260
1030
0
820
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.126
0.137
0,119
0.109
Km
Beg.Y
0.132
0.110
0.105
0.129
Km
End X
0.184
0.216
0.120
0.000
Km
End Y
0.215
0.087
0.000
0.164
Km
Width
7.5
7
5.5
7
Meters
$ of Lanes

2
1
2
#
Speed Limit

45
35
45
m.p.h.
Volume

760
450
970
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.070
Km
Y



0.107
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
-19:00
Intersection: Sugar Creek/I-85 N.Ramp (229)
X= 0.131
Km;Y=
0.287 Km
Phasing: 3-phase coordinated




(Link)


Lime


Parameter
MS. C.)
EfI-85
) S(S. C.)
W(1-85 )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg. X
0.126
0.250
0.132
0.034
Km
Beg. Y
0.418
0.287
0.150
0.236
Km
End X
0.121
0.143
0.135
0.109
Km
End Y
0.298
0.294
0.278
0.283
Km
Width
7
3.5
7
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
0
#
Capacity
3000
1500
300C
0
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
4;
0
m«p *h.
Volume
410
100
781
0
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.136
0.143
D.120
0.109
Km
Beg.Y
0.299
0.294
0.264
0.283
Km
End X
0.138
0.250
0.117
0.034
Km
End Y
0.419
0.287
0.143
0.236
Km
Width
7
3.5
7.5
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
2
1
#
Speed Limit
45
0
45
35
m« p. h«
Volume
420
0
430
490
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X
0.100



Km
y
0.350



Km
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 10:30
- 18:30
Intersection: Sugar Creek/I-85 S.Ramp (228).
X= 0.125
Km;Y=
0.134 Km
Phasing: 3-phase coordinated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
NfS. C.)
E(I-8«5
V S(S. C.)
W(1-85 )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.120
0.206
0.117
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.2611
0.190
0.000
0.142
Km
End X
0.117
0.142
0.131
0.110
Km
End Y
0.143
0.141
0.122
0.132
Km
Width
7.5
4.5
11
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
0
3
2
#
Capacity
3000
0
4500
2900
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
0
45
35
m. p. h.
Volume
560
0
910
670
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.132
0.142
0.117
0.110
Km
Beg.Y
0.150
0.141
0.122
0.132
Km
End X
0.135
0.206
0.120
0.000
Km
End Y
0.278
0.190
0.000
0.142
Km
Width
7
4.5
7
6.5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
1
2
0
#
Speed Limit
45
35
45
0
m. p. h.
Volume
900
150
1110
0
veh/hr
Receptor Location:





X
0.100



Km
Y
0.350



Km
Z
3



Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
10:00
- 16:00
Intersection: Hawthorne/Independence
(421);
X= 0.099
Km;Y=
: 0.115 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed
time (cycle
= 90s.;
Indep.-62, Hawthorne-
>28)
(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Haw. )
E(IndeD) S(Haw. )
W(IndeD)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.1
0.193
0.032
0.006
Km
Beg. Y
0.212
0.074
0.038
0.154
Km
End X
0.100
0.112
0.097
0.085
Km
End Y
0.129
0.111
0.099
0.115
Km
Width
7
10
10
9
Meters
0 of Lanes
2
3
3
3
#
Capacity
3000
4400
4400
4200
veh,/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
350
1540
540
1740
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.106
0.107
0.089
0.106
Km
Beg.Y
0.126
0.103
0.102
0.124
Km
End X
0.139
0.187
0.024
0.007
Km
End Y
0.208
0.064
0.038
0.164
Km
Width
6
10
6
10
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
480
1670
450
1560
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.146


Km
Y

0.116


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period:
: 16:00
- 16:30
Inter section: Hawthorne/Independence
(421);
X= 0.099
Km; Y=
0.115 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed
time (CYCLE
= 100s.
; Indep.-78,
Hawthorne-22)
(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Haw. )
E(IndeD) S(Haw. )
W(IndeD)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.134
0.193
0.032
0.006
Km
Beg. Y
0.212
0.074
0.038
0.154
Km
End X
0.100
0.112
0.097
0.085
Km
End Y
0.129
0.111
0.099
0.115
Km
Width
7
10
10
9
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
3
3
#
Capacity
3000
4400
4400
4200
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
400
1770
710
2700
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.106
0.107
0.089
0.106
Km
Beg.Y
0.126
0.103
0.102
0.124
Km
End X
0.139
0.187
0.024
0.007
Km
End Y
0.208
0.064
0.038
0.164
Km
Width
6
10
6
10
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
640
2660
450 .
1830
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.146


Km
Y

0.116


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 16:30 - 17:00
Intersection: Hawthorne/Independence (421); 1=0.099 Km;Y= 0.115 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle=105s.; Indep.-82, Hawthorne-23)
Parameter
N(Haw. )
E(IndeD)
S(Haw. V
W(IndeD>
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.134
0.193
0.032
0.006
Km
Beg.Y
0.212
0.074
0.038
0.154
Km
End X
0.100
0.112
0.097
0.085
Km
End Y
0.129
0.111
0.099
0.115
Km
Width
7
10
10
9
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
3
3
#
Capacity
3000
4400
4400
4200
V^h/hr.(Level E)
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
430
2140
780
3210
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.106
0.107
0.089
0.106
Km
Beg.Y
0.126
0.103
0.102
0.124
Km
End X
0.139
0.187
0.024
0.007
Km
End Y
0.208
0.064
0.038
0.164
Km
Width
6
10
6
10
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
680
3220
500
2160
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.146


Km
Y

0.116


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 17:00 - 17:30
Intersection: Hawthorne/Independence (421); X= 0.099 Km;Y= 0.115 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed time (cycle=145; Indep.-1l8, Hawthorne-27)
LiPfr
Parameter
N(Haw. )
E(IndeD)
S(Haw. )
W(Indec)
Orbits
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.134
0.193
0.032
0.006
Km
Beg. Y
0.212
0.074
0.038
0.154
Km
End X
0.100
0.112
0.097
0.085
Km
End Y
0.129
0.111
0.099
0.115
Km
Width
7
10
10
9
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
3
3
#
Capacity
3000
4400
4400
4200
Veh. '/Mr. (Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h..
Volume
430
1510
820
3160
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.106
0.107
0.089
0.106
Km
Beg. Y
0.126
0.103
0.102
0.124
Km
End X
0.139
0.187
0.024
0.007
Km
End Y
0.208
0.064
0.038
0.164
Km
Width
6
10
6
10
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
660
3260
440
1550
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.146


Km
Y

0.116


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 17:30
- 18:00
Inter section: Hawthorne/Independence
(421);
X- 0.099
Km;Y:
= 0.115 Km
Phasing: 2-phase - fixed
time (cycles100s.;
Indep.-78,
Hawthorne-22)
(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Haw. )
E(IndeD) S(Haw. )
W(IndeD)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.134
0.193
0.032
0.006
Km.
Beg.Y
0.212
0.074
0.038
0.154
Km
End X
0.100
0.112
0.097
0.085
Km
End Y
0.129
0.111
0.099
0.115
Km
Width
7
10
10
9
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
3
3
#
Capacity
3000
4400
4400
4200
veR./hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p« hi
Volume
310
1430
670
2620
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.106
0.107
.0.089
0.106
Km
Beg.Y
0.126
0.103
0.102
0.124
Km
End X
0.139
0.187
0.024
0.007
Km
End Y
0.208
0.064
0.038
0.164
Km
Width
6
10
6
10
Meters
# of Lanes
2
3
2
3
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
570
2660
360
1420
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X

0.146


Km
Y

0.116


Km
Z

3


Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 10:00 - 16:00
Intersection: Central/Hawthorne (422);	X= 0.114 Km;Y= 0.124 Km
Phasing: 2-phase fixed time (cycle = 65s.; Cent.-40, Hawthorne -25)
	Link	
(Link)
N(Hawth) E(Cent.) S(Hawth) W(Cent.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.135
0.238
0.098
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.250
0.096
0.000
0.149
Km
End X
0.113
0.125
0.118
0.105
Km
End Y
0.135
0.124
0.111
0.123
Km
Width
5
6
6
6
Meters
it of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity-
1800
2800
2800
2800
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
280
600
270
660
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.117
0.123
0.111
0.105
Km
Beg. Y
0.134
0.118
0.112
0.128
Km
End X
0.140
0.232
0.091
0.000
Km
End Y
0.250
0.092
0.000
0.155
Km
Width
5 '
5.5
6
5.5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
270
610
310
620
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.082
Km
Y



0.117
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL	Time Period: 16:00 - 18:00
Intersection: Central/Hawthorne (422);	X= 0.114 Km;Y= 0.124 Km
Phasing: 3-phase fixed time (cycle= 100s.; Cent.-65, Hawthorne-35
Link
Parameter
N(Hawth)
E(Cent.)
S(Hawth)
W( Cent.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.135
0.238
0.098
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.250
0.096
0.000
0.149
Km
End X
0.113
0.125
0.118
0.105
Km
End Y
0.135
0.124
0.111
0.123
Km
Width
5
6
6
6
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
2
#
Capacity
1800
2800
2800
2800
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
280
490
440
1240
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.117
0.123
0.111
0.105
Km
Beg. Y
0.134
0.118
0.112
0.128
Km
End X
0.140
0.232
0.091
0.000
Km
End Y
0.250
0.092
0.000
0.155
Km
Width
5
5.5
6
5.5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
480
1150
290
'530
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.082
Km
Y



0.117
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
:. 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Freedom/Ashley (852)

X= 0.247
Km;Y=
0.102 Km
Phasing: 4-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
NfFree.)
EC Ash.
) S(Free.)
W(Ash. )
Units
Approach Link:





Beg. X
0.130
0.301
0.350
0.161
Km
Beg.Y
0.203
0.200
0.016
0.000
Km
End X
0.232
0.254
0.261
0.240
Km
End Y
0.106
0.118
0.097
0.082
Km
Width
10.5
4
11
7.5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
1
3
2
#¦
Capacity
4700
1500
4500
3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
45
35
m. p.h.
Volume
820
250
980
500
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.240
0.261
o.25r.
0.231
Km
Beg.Y
0.116
0.113
CO
o
•
o
0.091
Km
End X
0.144
0.309
0.350
0.144
Km
End Y
0.209
0.200
0.000
0.000
Km
Width
10.5
3.5
11
7-5
Meters
# of Lanes
3
1
3
2
#
Speed Limit
45.
35
45
35
m.p.h.
Volume
870
240
760
690
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X



0.234
Km
Y



0.022
Km
Z



3
Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL


Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00 •
Intersection: Freedom/Tuckaseegee
(853)
X= 0.118
Km; Y=
0.223 Km
Phasing: 5-phase full actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter
N(Free.
) E(Tuck.
.) S(Free.)
W(Tuck.)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.018
0.212
0.240
0.007
Km
Beg. Y
0.335
0.229
0.116
0.200
Km
End X
0.100
0.144
0.144
0.101
Km
End Y
0.238
0.229
0.209
0.218
Km
Width
9
7
10.5
7-5
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
3
2
#
Capacity
3100
3000
4700
.3000
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
45
35
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
820
240
920
350
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.109
0.150
0.130
0.097
. Km
Beg. Y
0.248
0.220
0.203
0.229
Km
End X
0.019
0.211
0.232
0.007
Km
End Y
0.349
0.222
0.106
0.209
Km
Width
12
5.5
10.5
7
Meters
# of Lanes
3
1
3
2
#
Speed Limit
45
35
45
45
m.p.h.
Volume
1020
170
920
220
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.234

Km
Y


0.022

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK
MODEL

Time Period
: 11:00
- 19:00
Intersection: Idlewild
Rama/Monroe Rd
.. (480);
X= 0.078
Km; Y=
0.078 Km
Phasing: 6-phase,
full
actuated




(Link)


Link


Parameter

NfMonroe)
Efldwlcn
S(Monore)
WfRama )
Onits
Approach Link:






Beg.X

0.000
0.522
0.084
0.025
Km
Beg.Y

0.109
0.132
0.032
0.000
Km
End X

0.047
0.092
0.099
0.062
Km
End Y

0.086
0.087
0.073
0.067
Km
Width

7
6
6
4
Meters
# of Lanes

2
2
2
1
#
Capacity

3000
2800
2800
1500
veh/hr.(Leve]
Speed Limit

45
35
45
35
m. p, h.
Volume

790
480
460
410
veh/hr.
Exit Link:






Beg.X

0.052
0.102
0.095
0.056
Km
Beg.Y

0.097
0.081
0.065
0.070
Km
End X

0.000
0.532
0.082
0.021
Km
End Y

0.118
0.124
0.028
0.000
Km
Width

6
6.5
6
3
Meters
# of Lanes

2
2
2
1
#
Speed Limit

45
35
45
35
m.p.h.
Volume

630
560
500
430
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:






X


0.475


Km
Y


0.152


Km
Z


3


Meters
-------

DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Beatties Ford/Rozzells
Phasing: 4-phase full actuated
(Link)		
Time Period: 10:30 - 18:30
Ferry/Trade;(813) X= 0.100 Km; Y= 0.101 Km
Link
N(Trde.) E(Beat.) S(Trde.) W(Rozz.V
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.111
0.202
0.099
0.020
Km
Beg.Y.
0.200
0.197
0.077
0.200
Km
End X
0.100
0.113
0.099
0.081
Km
End Y
0.111
0.109
0.088
0.098
Km
Width.
6
6
9
6
Meters
# of Lanes
o
2
2
2
#
Capacity
o
2800
3100
2800
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
O
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
o
380
720
320
veh/hr.
Exit Link:





Beg.X
0.100
0.117
.0.089
0.086
Km ,
Beg.Y
0.111
0.105
0.084
0.100
Km
End X
0.111
0.202
0.092
0.027
Km
End Y
0.200
0.187
0.078
0.200
Km
Width
6
5.5
9
5.5
Meters
# of Lanes
1
2
2
2
#
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m. p. h.
Volume
100
420 .
620
280
veh/hr.
Receptor Location:





X


0.092

Km
Y


0.011

Km
Z


3

Meters
-------
DATA FOR MIDBLOCK MODEL
Intersection: Fifth/State/Trade (813);
Phasing: 4-phase full actuated
Time Period:
X= 0.093
10:30 - 18:30
Km;Y= 0.069 Km
Exit Link:
Beg.X
Beg. Y
End X
End Y
Width
# of Lanes
Speed Limit
Volume
Receptor Location:
X
Y
Z
Parameter
N(Trde.)
E(Fifth)
S(Trde.V
W(State)
Units
Approach Link:





Beg.X
0.089
0.138
0.080
0.000
Km
Beg. Y
0.084
0.000
0.000
0.101
Km
End X
0.092
0.107
0.092
0.082
Km
End Y
0.078
0.066
0.049
0.071
Km
Width
9
6
7.5
3
Meters
# of Lanes
2
2
2
1
#
Capacity
3100
2800
3000
1400
veh/hr.(Level
Speed Limit
35
35
35
35
m.p.h.
Volume
620
240
460
110
veh/hr.
0.099
0.104
0.086
0.082
0.077
0.057
0.054
0.076
0.099
0.13.1
0.072
0.000
0.088
0.000
0.000
0.104
9
6
6
5.5
2
2
2
1
35
35
35
35
720
210
420
70


0.092



0.011



3

Km
Km
Km
Km
Meters
#
m.p.h.
veh/hr.
Km
Km
Meters
-------