POPLAR RIVER FISHERY INVESTIGATION
MONTANA
MAY, JULY-AUGUST 1975
TECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS BRANCH
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION VIII
MARCH, 1976
-------
INTRODUCTION
In March of 1975 the Montana Department of Health and Environmental
Sciences (DHES) requested that the Surveillance and Analysis Division,
E.P.A. Region VIII, conduct a fishery survey of the Poplar River, Montana.
The request was initiated when DHES personnel learned that a new coal-
fired generating station had been proposed by the Saskatchewan Power
Corporation in Canada. The station will be located on the East Fork
of the Poplar River near Coronach, Saskatchewan and will discharge an
effluent high in total dissolved solids. Drainage from coal stockpiles
and fly-ash lagoons may also contribute toxic materials to the river.
The Poplar River originates in Canada and flows south into Montana
for 160.9 kilometers (100 miles) where it joins with the Missouri
River near Poplar, Montana (Figure 1). The Poplar River was reported to
support a resident walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) fishery downstream
from the town of Scoby, Montana and to serve as an important spawning
and nursery area for both resident fish and migrating Missouri River
fish. As a result, the requested purpose of the survey was to determine
the relative abundance, distribution and habitat utilization of sport
fishes in the river. In response to the request a two phase study
was suggested which would assess the spring spawning activities of the
walleye (S_. vitreum) and northern pike (Esox lucius) which are the
predominant sport fishes in the river, and would also determine relative
abundance, habitat utilization, and distributions of sport fishes
during critical summer low flow conditions. During the remainder of
1975 the DHES was to conduct water quality and macro-invertebrate
population studies on the stream. The Montana Department of Fish and
Game was to conduct mark and recovery studies on the existing sport
fisheries in order to estimate population size and determine the extent
of migrations throughout the system.
METHODS
Fish sampling was conducted with trap nets, seines or electrofishing.
Trap nets used during the survey had 0.76 by 0.91 meter (2.5 ft. x 3 ft.)
frames or 0.76 by 1.52 meter (2.5 ft. x 5 ft.) 'frames. Smaller nets
had a 0.63 cm. mesh {h in.) and the larger frame nets had 1.27 cm.(^ in.)
mesh. All trap nets were set for 24 hour periods. Data from the trap
nets are reported in Tables 1 and 2 (Appendix).
Two haul seines were used to capture fish from pool areas. A
1.83 meter by 30.48 meter (6 ft. x 100 ft.) net with 1.27 cm. {h in.)
mesh was used in small pools. Larger pools required the use of a 3.05 by
76.2 meter (10 ft. x 250 ft.) net with 2.54 cm. mesh. Fish caught by
seine are reported in Table 3 (Appendix).
Electrofishing was conducted with a Coffelt1 system capable of
generating a maximum of 300 volts, 10 amps, and 200 pulses per second.
A single probe with 91.4 meters (300 ft.) of cable was used to shock
fish. Fish shocking data are presented in Table 4.
1. Any mention of product names does not constitute E.P.A. endorsement.
-------
Figure 1. Poplar River, Montana.
-------
- 2 -
Water samples were collected for total suspended solids (TSS),
total dissolved solids (TDS) and metals. TDS and TSS samples were
preserved with wet ice. Samples for metals analysis were preserved
with 5 ml of HNOo per liter of sample and analyzed (as is, not digested)
by atomic absorption. Results are reported as acid recoverable. All
TSS, TDS and metals samples were transported to the Region VIII E.P.A.
laboratory in Denver for analysis.
Selected parameters were measured in the field at each sampling
station. The parameters and methods used to analyze them were as follows:
pH with an I.L. meter and probe, conductivity with a Beckman conductivity
meter, temperature with a hand held dial thermometer and flows with
a Kahlisco Pygmy current meter. Dissolved oxygen samples were collected,
fixed in the field and analyzed later.
Descriptions of .sampling station locations are listed in Table 5.
Figure 2 depicts the locations of the sampling stations.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fish
During the May (Spring) survey water levels were high (70 c.f.s.
at the Canada-U.S. border, EF-6) and permitted fish to scatter through-
out the system instead of congregating the deeper runs and pools.
Thus, large numbers of fish were not captured. Trap nets only were used
to capture fish at selected sampling sites. Numbers of fish captured
are listed in Table 1 and the distribution of sport fishes as indicated
by catch data is shown in Figure 3. Walleye were collected from each
section of the Poplar River system, indicating their use of each
drainage area during Spring flow conditions (Figure 3). Very few fish
were caught at the station near the mouth (PR-1). However, the survey was
conducted immediately after high water conditions and migrating fish may
have already passed the station. A male walleye was cptured on the East
Fork approximately two miles downstream from the border (EF-5). North-
ern pike were collected'on the upper main stem (PR-4) and West Fork (WF-1).
Only one ripe fish was captured during the May survey.
Water quality as measured during the Spring survey was sufficient
to support fish life at all stations (Table 6).
The Summer (July-August) survey was more intensive. Seines, electro-
fishing equipment, and trap nets were used to capture fish. Figure 4
and Tables 2, 3, and 4 list fish caught during the survey. Flows were lower
than those in the Spring sampling period (Table 7) and more fish were congre-
gated in the deeper pools. Young of the year walleye or first year fish
were captured in the East and Middle Forks near the U.S.-Canada border
(Stations MF-5 and EF-6). The presence of first year fish in these areas
-------
-------
Figure 3. Foplar River Fishery Investigation - Catch Data, May 1975.
-------
Figure h. Poplar River Fishery Investigation - Catch Data, July-August 1975.
-------
- 3 -
indicates adult fish are using the river for spawning, probably in the
general vicinity of the stations where the young fish were captured. Also,
some portions of the river were being used as rearing .areas for juvenile
fish. Adult walleye were found throughout the Poplar River system with the
largest concentrations of fish located near the confluence of the East and
Middle Forks (Figure 4).
Northern pike were captured in the East and Middle Forks and in
the main stem. No northern pike were captured in the West Fork. Young
of the year pike were collected from the upper Middle Fork (MF-5) and the
lower main stem (PR-2).
Smallmouth Bass were collected from the lower main stem (PR-2),
the lower West Fork (WF-2) and the upper main stem (PR-3), (Figure 4).
Most of the fish caught during the summer survey were inhabiting
deep pools in the stream; very few fish were taken from riffle areas.
The upper section of the East Fork (EF-4-6) did not support many game
fish during this survey (Figure 4). The stream bottom in the upper
East Fork was soft mud and walleyes, which require rocky riffle areas
for spawning, would find very few areas suitable for egg deposition.
Both the Middle Fork and main stem had rock substrates in riffle areas
where adult walleye could spawn and replenish the population. The
West Fork supported game fish only as far upstream as Station WF-2. No
game fish were found at the upstream stations (WF-3 through 6). At
these stations the West Fork had no measurable flow and consisted of
pools bordered by extensive growths of aquatic weeds. Forage or non-
game fish were abundant in the upper sections of all three forks.
WATER CHEMISTRY
Analysis of water samples collected from the Poplar River system
during the Summer survey did not reveal any chemical constituents
..that would be acutely toxic to fish (Tables 7 and 8). Sodium and
boron values were high but probably would not affect the present fishery.
Aluminum values were high (up to 2500 yg/£ at PR-2 and 2100 yg/s, at MF-3)
and if allowed to increase could affect the fishery. Ionized or potentially
ionizable aluminum as anionic or neutral precipitates may be deleterious to
growth and survival at concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/£ (E.P.A., 1972).
Total dissolved sol i.ds ranged from a low of 770 mg/£ in the West
Fork (WF-1) to a high of 1650 mg/x. in the East Fork (EF-6) on August 29.
Specific conductivities, which usually reflect TDS values varied from 940
at WF-4 to 2300 micromhos on the East Fork (EF-6) on July 31 and 1038 to
2410 micromhos (WF-4 and EF-6) on July 29. In laboratory studies
-------
- 4 -
Peterka (1972) determined that water of 1300 micromhos did not affect
the hatching of walleye and northern pike eggs. At 4000 micromhos
there was no hatching of walleye eggs and poor hatching of northern
pike eggs. Thus, increases in TDS during the spawning or hatching
season could have a detrimental effect on the existing fisheries.
At times the summer water temperatures may reach the maximum range
for the sport fishes. For example, on July 29 stream temperatures
ranged from 24 to 30 C. The maximum temperatures recommended for
walleye and pike are approximately 29 C (National Technical Advisory
Comm., 1968). If water temperatures increase above the 30 C level the
sport fish populations will be adversely affected.
CONCLUSIONS
The Poplar River supports a walleye fishery throughout most of
the system. The most important area, as reflected by numbers of fish
captured, was in the vicinity of the East and Middle Fork confluences.
More fish were found in the main stem just downstream from the confluence
and immediately upstream on both forks than in any other reach of the
river. Northern pike were found mainly in the main stem and Middle
Fork. Young of the year sport fish were captured in the Middle and
East Forks and main stem indicating the use of these stream reaches
as spawning and rearing areas. During the Spring, stream flows were
high and fish spread throughout the river system. In the Summer, low
water flows resulted in fish inhabiting the deeper pools within the
stream.
Chemical analysis of water samples revealed high concentrations
of aluminum and total dissolved salts (TDS). Aluminum values were
as high as 2500 yg/£, and total dissolved salts produced a specific
conductance of 2410 micromhos on the upper East Fork. Increases in
either aluminum or TDS could adverselyaaffect the fish populations.
During the Surrmer survey, water temperatures were at or above the
maximum temperatures recommended for walleye and northern pike. As
a result, if the existing fishery is to be protected efforts should
be made to prevent any withdrawal of water or added effluent from
increasing temperatures, TDS or aluminum concentrations beyond those
already observed.
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Environmental Protection Agency. 1972. Water Quality Criteria, Ecological
Research Series EPA -R3-73-033. p. 179.
National Technical Advisory Committee. 1968. Water Quality Criteria,
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration. 234 pp.
Peterka, John J. 1972. Effects of saline waters upon survival of fish
. eggs and larvae and upon theecology of the fathead minnow in North
Dakota. Dept. of Zoology, N. Dakota State Univ. OWRR Project No.
A-027-NDAK. 11 pp.
-------
APPENDIX
-------
TABLE 1
POPLAR RIVER FISHERY INVESTIGATION
KAY 1975
1 net day = 24 hour set
(PR-1) Poplar River at Poplar, Montana
8 net days 1 Walleye (240 mm)
2 Sauger (260, 275 mm)
1 Channel Cat
1 White Crappie
5 Black Bullheads
(PR-2) Poplar River - First Crossing Upstream of the Long Creek Confluence
10 net days 1 Goldeye
1 Redhorse
1 Carpsucker
2 Small Mouth Bass (280, 88 mm)
4 Suckers
Assorted Stonecats and Black Bullheads
(PR-3) Poplar River Approximately 15 Miles Downstream from Scobey
14 net days 3 Goldeye (314, 317, 327 mm)
9 Walleye (271, 351, 430, 267, 246,
430, 247, 364, 478 mm)
10 Stonecat
4 Redhorse
Misc. Suckers and Chubs
(PR-4) Poplar River - First Bridge Miles South of Scobey on Highway 13
8 net days 1 N. Pike (670 mm)
1 Stonecat
4 Common Suckers
(WF-1) Poplar River - West Fork at Highway 13 Bridge
8 net days 2 Walleye (430, 355 mm)
1 N. Pike (337 mm)
3 Suckers
(EF-3) Poplar - East Fork 5h Miles Upstream from Scobey
6 net days No Walleyes or Game Fish
-------
Table 1 continued
(EF-5) Poplar River - East Fork -
10 net days
(MF-2) Poplar River - Middle Fork
4 net days
First Crossing Downstream from the
Canadian Border
3 Walleye (500, 271 , 245 mm)
(Nets full of Dace, Chubs, Suckers,
and Darters)
- First Bridge Crossing Upstream from the
Confluence of Middle and East Forks
5 Walleye (137, 131, 270, 235, 145 mm)
-------
TABLE 2
POPLAR RIVER FISHERY INVESTIGATION
JULY - AUGUST 1975
TRAP NET DATA
1 net day = 24 hour set
(PR-1) Poplar River at Poplar, Montana
7 net days 1 Walleye
1 Sauger
1 Black Bullhead
9 Carpsuckers
1 White Sucker
1 Smallmouth Buffalo
(PR-2) Poplar River - First Crossing Upstream of the Long Creek Confluence
8 net days 2 Walleye (454, 265 mm)
1 Sauger (255 mm)
1 N. Pike (YOY)
1 Smallmouth Bass
1 Redhorse
Misc. Suckers and Chubs
(PR-3) Poplar River Approximately 15 Miles Downstream from Scobey
3 Walleye
(WF-1) West Fork of the Poplar River at Highway 13 Bridge
5 net days 1 Walleye (265 mm)
21 Stonecats
6 Black Bullheads
23 Common Suckers
3 Goldeye - one clipped left pelvic
1 Redhorse
(WF-2) West Fork of the Poplar River 3/4 Mile Upstream from the Highway 13
Bridge
2 net days 1 Walleye (268 mm)
4 Goldeye
7 Stonecats
1 Redhorse
16 Suckers
-------
-2-
Table 2 continued
(WF-4) West Fork of the Poplar River About Six Miles Southwest of Peerless
2 net days Numerous Suckers and Chubs
(WF-5) West Fork of the Poplar River at the First Bridge Crossing Downstream
From Richland
2 net days Numerous Suckers and Dace
(WF-6) West Fork of the Poplar River About Two Miles Upstream From Richland
2 net days Numerous Suckers
(PR-4) Poplar River at the Highway 13 Bridge Five Miles Downstream From Scobey
3 net days 2 Walleye (320, 280 mm)
2 N. Pike (550, 620 mm)
(PR-5) Poplar River Approximately One Mile Downstream From the Confluence
of the East Fork and the Middle Fork
4 net days 2 Walleye
2 Goldeye
1 Carp
2 Common Suckers
(PR-7) Poplar River Immediately Downstream From the Confluence of the East
Fork and Middle Fork
4 net days 13 Walleye
(MF-1) Middle Fork Immediately Upstream From the Confluence With the East Fork
4 net days 15 Walleye
1 Goldeye
8 Common Suckers
4 Redhorse
(MF-2) Middle Fork at the First Road Crossing Upstream From the East Fork
Confluence
4 net days 1 Walleye (190 mm)
1 N. Pike (550 mm)
2 Goldeye
116 White Suckers
3 Redhorse
1 Stonecat
-------
-3-
Table 2 continued
(MF-3) Middle Fork at the Second Road Crossing Approximately Five Miles
Upstream From the East Fork Confluence
4 net days 10 Walleye (310, 505, 310, 226, 250, 345,
370, 230, 215, 210 mm)
1 Goldeye
10 Redhorse
138 White Suckers
(MF-4) Middle Fork Approximately Two Miles Downstream From the Coal Creek
Confluence
1 net day No Fish
(MF-5) Middle Fork at the U.S.-Canadian Border
2 net days 2 Walleye (225, 215 mm)
5 N. Pike (230, 208, 231 , 218, 215 mm)
181 White Suckers
(EF-1) East Fork of the Poplar River Immediately Upstream From the Middle
Fork Confluence
4 net days 11 Walleye
1 Carp
3 Carpsuckers
14 White Suckers
(EF-4) East Fork Approximately Five Miles South of the. U.S.-Canadian Border
3 net days Numerous White Suckers, Chubs, Minnows,
and Black Bullheads
(EF-5) East Fork Approximately Two Miles South of the U.S.-Canadian Border
3 net days Numerous Redhorse, Carp, and Chubs
(EF-6) East Fork Immediately Downstream From the U.S.-Canadian Border
2 net days 1 Walleye (YOY)
Numerous White Suckers, Redhorse,
Chubs, and Stonecats
YOY- Young of the year or first year fish
-------
TABLE 3
POPLAR RIVER FISHERY INVESTIGATION
JULY - AUGUST 1975
SEINING DATA
(PR-2) Poplar River, First Crossing Upstream of the Long Creek Confluence.
Approximately 1000 ft. of Stream Seined.
1 Walleye (305 mm)
7 N. Pike (990, 790, 600, 620, 410,
460, 430 mm)
8 N. Pike (YOY)
1 Smallmouth Bass
2 Smallmouth Bass (YOY)
1 Drum (480 mm)
2 Goldeye
41 Redhorse
Misc. Suckers, Carp and Chubs
(PR-3) Poplar River Approximately 15 Miles Downstream from Scobey.
About 1200 ft. of River Seined.
4 Smallmouth Bass (180, 180, 62, 62 mm)
4 N. Pike (191, 191, 191, 400 mm)
16 Redhorse
24 White Suckers
6 Chubs
1 Goldeye - both pelvic fins clipped
(WF-2) West Fork of the Poplar River 3/4 Mile Upstream from the Highway
13 Bridge. 1000 ft. Seine Haul.
1 Smallmouth Bass (189 mm)
6 Walleye (325, 310, 295, 290, 306, 300 mm)
1 Goldeye (400 mm) - right pelvic clipped
6 White Suckers
1 Carp
(WF-3) West Fork South of Four Buttes. Seined 100 yds.
85 White Suckers
12 Chubs
15 Shiners
-------
-2-
Table 3 continued
(PR-4) Poplar River at the Highway 13 Bridge Five Miles Downstream from Scobey.
Seined 300 yds.
3 Walleye (410, 282, 375 mm)
9 Goldeye
1 Carp
44 White Suckers
12 Chubs
(PR-6) Poplar River at the First Bridge Downstream from the Confluence of
the East and Middle Forks. About 1600 ft. of Stream Seined.
9 Walleye
3 N. Pike
3 Carp
160 White Suckers
20 Redhorse
59 Goldeye
Numerous Chubs and Minnows
(MF-2) Middle Fork at the First Road Crossing Upstream from the East Fork
Confluence. 1000 ft. of Stream Seined.
5 Walleye
1 Carp
18 White Suckers
(EF-2) East Fork at the First Highway 13 Bridge North of Scobey, Upstream
from the U.S.G.S Gaging Station. 220 ft. of Stream Seined.
1 Walleye (320 mm)
81 White Suckers
7 Goldeye
24 Chubs
(EF-3) East Fork at the First Crossing One Mile East of Highway 13 and
5h Miles North of Scobey. 700 ft. of Stream Seined.
3 N. Pike* (480, 620, 660 mm)
1 Walleye (300 mm)
49 Goldeye
3 Common Suckers
* 3 additional No. Pike were lost when net was snagged
Y0Y- Young of the year or first year fish
-------
TABLE 4
POPLAR RIVER FISHERY INVESTIGATION
JULY - AUGUST 1975
ELECTROFISHING DATA
(EF-5) East Fork Immediately Downstream From the U.S.-Canadian Border.
900 ft. of Stream Shocked.
30 White Suckers
Numerous Small Shiners
(EF-2) East Fork at the First Highway 13 Bridge North of Scobey.
About 600 ft. of Stream Shocked.
1 Walleye (170 mm)
37 White Suckers
2 Carp
7 Chub
-------
TABLE 5
SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS ON THE POPLAR RIVER
1975
Station No. Description
PR-1 Poplar River at Poplar, Montana.
PR-2 Poplar River at the first crossing upstream from the
Long Creek confluence.
PR-3 Poplar River approximately 15 miles downstream from
Scobey, Montana.
WF-1 West Fork of the Poplar River at Highway 13 Bridge.
WF-2 West Fork of the Poplar River 3/4 mile upstream from
the Highway 13 Bridge.
WF-3 West Fork of the Poplar River about 13 miles South
of Four Buttes.
WF-4 West Fork of the Poplar River about six miles South-
west of Peerless, Montana.
WF-5 West Fork of the Poplar River at the first bridge
crossing downstream from Richland, Montana.
WF-6 West Fork of the Poplar River two miles upstream
from Richland, Montana.
PR-4 Poplar River at the Highway 13 Bridge five miles
downstream from Scobey.
PR-5 Poplar River approximately one mile downstream from
the confluence of the East and Middle Fork.
PR-6 Poplar River at the first bridge downstream from the
East and Middle Forks confluence.
PR-7 Poplar River immediately downstream from the East
and Middle Forks confluence.
MF-1 Middle Fork immediately upstream from the confluence
with the East Fork.
MF-2 Middle Fork at the first road crossing upstream from
the East Fork confluence.
-------
Table 5 (continued)
Station No. Description
MF-3 Middle Fork at the second county road crossing
approximately five miles upstream from MF-2.
MF-4 Middle Fork about two miles downstream from the Coal
Creek confluence.
MF-5 Middle Fork at the U.S.-Canada border.
EF-1 East Fork of the Poplar River immediately upstream
from the Middle Fork confluence.
EF-2 East Fork at the first Highway 13 Bridge North of
Scobey, upstream from the U.S. Geological Survey
gaging station.
EF-3 East Fork at the first crossing one mile East of
Highway 13 and 5h miles North of Scobey.
EF-4 East Fork approximately five miles South of the
U.S.-Canada border.
EF-5 East Fork about two miles South of the U.S.-Canada
border.
EF-6 East Fork immediately downstream from the U.S.-
Canada border.
-------
TABLE 6
POPLAR RIVER SURVEY CHEMICAL DATA
MAY 12 & 18 - 1975
Station Date D.O. Cond. TSS TDS Sodium
No. Yr/Mo/Day Temp. °C (ppm) pH (micromhos) (mq/a.) (mq/iQ (mq/t.)
PR-1
75/05/12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
75/05/18
17.0
8.0
8.2
1100
-
-
-
PR-2
75/05/12
16.5
8.9
7.9
1020
_
-
53
75/05/18
14.5
8.3
8.2
1075
12
684
' 161
WF-1
75/05/12
17.0
8.6
7.9
805
_
-
139
75/05/18
15.5
8.4
7.9
1000
8
606
178
PR-4
75/05/12
15.0
9.0
7.9
945
_
_
105
75/05/18
15.5
8.1
7.4
925
21
556
54
MF-2
75/05/12
14.5
8.5
7.9
880
44
75/05/18
16.0
7.6
8.1
1100
18
630
114
EF-6
75/05/12
16.5
10.5
8.4
890
_
_
60
75/05/18
15.5
9.5
8.4
675
14
430
52
-------
TABLE 7
POPLAR RIVER SURVEY CHEMICAL DATA AND FLOWS
JULY 29 & 31, August 5-1975
Station
No.
Date
Yr/Mo/Day
Temp. °C
D.O.
(ppm)
PH
Cond.
(micromhos)
TSS
(mq/a)
TDS
(mq/O
PR-1
75/07/29
28.0
8.5
1600
24
1030
75/07/31
23.0
5.1
8.5
1600
18
986
75/08/05
20.0
-
8.7
1575
34
1080
PR-2
75/07/29
26.0
7.5
_
1800
40
1200
75/07/31
22.0
5.7
8.6
1650
62
1160
75/08/05
19.0
6.3
8.7
1750
26
1180
WF-1
75/07/29
30.0
8.4
-
1200
29
770
75/07/31
19.0
6.8
8.1
1650
10
756
75/08/05
22.0
-
8.9
1190
30
752
WF-4
75/07/29
28.0
12.4
8.5
1038
10
830
75/07/31
22.0
10.3
9.2
940
5
784
75/08/05
22.0
10.4
9.3
1275
8
786
PR-4
75/07/29
28.0
7.5
8.5
2200
37
1480
75/07/31
18.0
-
7.0
2100
18
1420
75/08/05
22.0
6.4
8.8
2000
30
1440
MF-2
75/07/29
25.0
5.4
9.2
1700
36
1040
75/07/31
22.0
6.3
9.0
1600
24
1040
75/08/05
22.0
7.4
9.1
1550
33
1050
MF-3
75/07/29
26.0
6.9
9.8
1450
41
890
75/07/31
21.0
6.0
8.9
1375
55
872
75/08/05
20.0
7.4
8.9
1375
76
916
MF-5
75/08/05
20.0
1
5.6
9.1
2000
4
1410
EF-5
75/07/29
24.0
5.2
6.5
2410
12
1650
75/07/31
20.0
4.5
7.0
2300
10
1640
75/08/05
22.0
6.4
9.0
2150
23
1520
Flows
(c.f.s.)
35.0
4.0
0.0
24.0
3.0
19.0
-------
TABLE 8
POPLAR RIVER SURVEY, CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF ACID RECOVERABLE METALS
JULY 29 & 31, August 5 - 1975
Station
No.
Date
Yr/Mo/Day
Chemical Parameters (uQ/s.)
Sodi um
Se
As
A1
Fe
Cu
Ca
Mq
Zn
B
PR-1
75/07/29
331,000
<10
<25
600
750
4
25,600
35,000
<5
1800
75/07/31
310,000
<10
<25
900
1100
6
28,400
38,500
10
1600
75/08/05
331,000
<10
<25
1600
1450
6
27,600
44,500
15
1400
PR-2
75/07/29"
351,000
<10
<25
700
900
4
24,600
41 ,500
5
2300
75/07/31
320,000
<10
<25
2500
1400
8
24,600
41 ,500
10
1700
75/08/05
331,000
<10
<25
1300
850
6
23,600
48,000
<5
2100
WF-1
75/07/29
258,000
<10
<25
400
700
<2
11,800
16,000
<5
1150
75/07/31
279,000
<10
<25
400
550
<2
13,800
19,000
<5
1100
75/08/05
248,000
<10
<25
300
250
<2
11,800
16,000
<5
1000
WF-4
75/07/29
269,000
<10
<25
<50
250
<2
8,800
19,000
5
1350
75/07/31
289,000
<10
<25
100
250
<2
8,800
16,000
5
1200
75/08/05
248,000
<10
<25
300
250
<2
11,800
16,000
<5
500
PR-4
75/07/29
444,000
<10
<25
800
750
4
17,600
28,500
10
3400
75/07/31
444,000
<10
<25
700
750
6
25,600
60,500
5
2500
75/08/05
403,000
<10
<25
1000
900
6
28,400
51,000
<5
3000
MF-2
75/07/29
258,000
<10
<25
800
800
<2
23,600
41,500
5
2000
75/07/31
320,000
<10
<25
900
800
6
24,600
32,000
<5
1600
75/08/05
310,000
<10
<25
1100
1100
8
27,600
44,500
5
1600
MF-3
75/07/29
248,000
<10
<25
1100
1150
6
29,400
48,000
10
1900
75/07/31
269,000
<10
<25
1800
1500
4
33,400
32,000
10
1400
75/08/05
279,000
<10
<25
2100
2600
6
32,400
45,000
10
1100
MF-5
75/08/05
351 ,000
<10
<25
300
200
4
42,200
79,500
< 5
1500
EF-6
75/07/29
465,000
<10
<25
<50
400
6
30,400
67,000
15
3250
75/07/31
475,000
<10
<25
300
450
6
33,400
41,500
10
3700
75/08/05
486,000
<10
<25
200
550
6
38,400
67,000
5
2500
------- |