ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ROCKY MOUNTAIN-PRAIRIE REGION
REGION VIII
RED RIVER OF THE
NORTH BASIN
DECEMBER 1972
-------
/?££> 0 Vf€
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT SECTION
Narrative A
Basin Load Summary B
Planned Accomplishments C
Point Source Loads § Locations D
Ambient W.Q. Status E
Tactical Solutions F
Point Source Reductions Required G
-------
SECTION A
Narrative
-------
^ K/ ^'\
. ,qv /L—
A : : ["•„ ,/•¦ ,r 1
fl v ' »4 r. 1»C> r - \») iV V ~ 4 * J f
V \ I IQP . ^ •' m*S\ ^ \J
!.r
f\ x -^xAvf/''"'
59 ,-*57
7 6 V ;'"N~ ^
O _ ^r/V;'\4fr.V(v^"^.;.^?/
% ^T-/^"'--1 s^~\,^
V. ' /("
' :frM '
v^-r^V
RED RIVER. BASIN"
«7 V-^ .^"'. ~"--T '•. '•', 2J • ¦";- ?
r1 j; /3-
,1 4U rrir^i-:' vo;1m
Mr^ ?
s\ v> >"/• ;i:;'».v'v..* _"-f> 1
n 0 Y\ <,' r"" -. ^-/
v* ^ V • • -V !c '¦ r <>
3^V ¦: A x '-cv
-------
RED RIVER - FIGURE 9
I. Priority Area Identification
The Red River of the North River Basin encompasses portions
of the States of North Dakota, Iowa and Minnesota and the Dominion
of Canada. The area of primary effort for Region VIII in this
Accomplishment Plan falls entirely within the State of North Dakota.
Just considering the mainstem of the Red River which borders Minnesota
and North Dakota, and three major tributaries (Red Lake River in
Minnesota, and the Sheyenne and Park Rivers in North Dakota), approxi-
mately 955 river miles are traversed. Seven hundred and eighty-two of
these miles fall under North Dakota's jurisdiction. The entire basin
covers approximately 38,000 square miles.
II. Problem Assessment
The Red River Basin involves three States, two EPA Regional
Jurisdictions, and drains into Canada. Consequently, the problem
includes institutional constraints and relations on International,
interstate, and inter-regional level. As a result, the effort is
fragmented and the water pollution problem is not addressed with the
full amount of resources that are available.
a. Although the North Dakota population is relatively small,
247,000 people in 1970, the limited availability of quality
water supplies, the general widespread nature of the pollution
problem and the international aspects combine to make this an
important priority area.
b. Of the 782 river miles in North Dakota, 280 are estimated
to be out of compliance with North Dakota's water quality standards
some time during the water year.
c. The major industrial pollution in this basin results from
the operations of sugar beet mills.
d. In 1965 an Enforcement Conference was convened in order to
address the water quality problems in the Red River. The
Conference made several recommendations regarding large municipal
and industrial dischargers, including the four sugar beet mills.
The recommendations of this Conference as they relate to North
Dakota are reflected in this Basin Accomplishment Plan.
-------
2
e. The North Dak'ota standards and implementation schedule are
adequate. However, there is a problem of differing standards at
the Minnesota-North Dakota state line that must be resolved.
f. All major waste sources are presently under a schedule of
improvement and compliance so the main effort is directed
toward seeing that the schedules are maintained. However, due
to the diversity of wastes sources and the levels of nutrient
loadings, full compliance with water quality standards is not
assured.
g. Water quality surveys and plant effluent and discharge point
stream monitoring will be carried out to determine if additional
nutrient removal by point sources is required. Otherwise, no
additional treatment needs are identified at this time.
Another significant problem is the discharging of waste-
water effluent under ice thus causing an oxygen depletion. In
North Dakota, all the municipal systems except for Fargo, hold
their effluent through the winter and discharge during the Spring
and Fall months. Fargo is in the process of constructing a 580-
acre lagoon which will provide storage of its effluent through
the winter. American Crystal Sugar at Drayton is constructing
a recycling unit whereby the majority of its effluent will not
reach the stream system.
Because most dischargers release their wastes during Spring
and Fall which are also the times of peak sugar beet processing,
a large slug loading is experienced upon the river system at these
times. Proposed surveys in this plan should provide the additional
information needed to determine the stream effects of this practice
and any necessary recommendations for remedies. Special problems
may also come as a result of the low flows at reduced velocities
that prevent the river from being adequately flushed, thus, nutrient
balance and siltation may be more troublesome than in most other
cases.
h. The Basin covers part of three states, and the Dominion of
Canada, thus there are some interstate and international relations
questions to be considered.
i. Since the Basin also cuts across two FPA regions, Regions V
and VIII, and Region V has not designated the Red River Basin as
a priority basin, special coordination needs to be developed to
assure proper water quality management in the area.
-------
3
.II. Agency arid/or Operational Objectives
It is EPA's objective to insure instream water quality standards are
not violated. The Regional office is utilizing (1) North Dakota State's
effluent requirements for municipal dischargers and (2) EPA/Industry
commitments as criteria for reaching this objective? These criteria
are:
Sugar Beet Industry B0D5 = 5#/Ton sliced beets processed
Fecal Col iform = 75 x lO^/Ton slided
beets processed
By FY 75, the BOD5 effluent requirements will be met by North Dakota.
An additional reduction of 356# TSS will be needed in FY 76 in order
to maintain compliance with the criterion. These conclusions apply
to North Dakota's portion of the pollution loading since no effluent
criteria have been established for industries in Minnesota.
Projected reductions to be realized by FY 73 and 74 are:
The DFIC Survey to be completed June 73 should reveal whether or not
recent improvements to several wastewater treatment plants in the basin
have resulted in water quality improvements.
The objectives outlined above will be achieved through the following
program elements and their listed activities:
1. Refuse Act Permits (3B2124) - obtain commitments* to reduce
pollution loadings from several key industries.
2. Municipal Waste Treatment Construction Grants (2B8164) - help
finance the construction of several new wastewater treatment plants
and wastewater treatment plant improvements which will increase
plant efficiency or solve some other water quality problem.
3. Water Quality Planning (2B3149) - approve a comprehensive water
quality management plan whicti will provide guidance for effective
management of the water quality.
4. O&M, Water Quality Monitoring, Water Pollution Source Surveillance
and Water Quality Enforcement (2B8163), (2B2147), (2B2148), (3B1123) -
assess impact of improvements and carry out implementation
schedules.
Municipal WWTP 25 mg/1 BOD5 in effluent
30 mg/1 TSS in effluent
FY 73
BOD5 60794 #/Day
TSS 13420 #/Day
FY 74
65248 #/Day
58456 #/Day
IV. Approach
*These commitment actions will be immediately converted to permit actions under
the new legislation as soon as guidelines are available.
-------
4
5. Environmental Impact Statements Review (2B6117) - assure that re-
sponsibilities assigned to EPA via the NEPA are observed and
environmental quality maintained and protected.
-------
SECTION B
Basin Load Summary
-------
I » \ .1 U ( \ J. < I unjiM riv.\i\ vfi IL.L I
U WIIW I1WI L.I1
1. Area covered:
Tn Mn n7ni
A b/ itw • U w I
Reaion
WT T T
- » » «
State(s) Mn-iiTi
Entire Basin
2. Water quality objectives:
(a)
Current
cri teri a
Parameter (see WQS) (See Tabl£ 4")
mg/1 J mg/1
—j __ , same as current
TSS -30 uent ^ vcU criteria
(see WQS]"
mg/1
BOD5-25 mg/f)
(b) EPA Objective: (c)
Minimum Acceptable Actual Level at Accuracy
Ambient 'level Worst Time of Yr. (% +)
(See Table 2) ("Regional est.)
1 %
ml
DO 5.0 mg/1
Stds . for .9 rv>s(SL
2%
Total Coli form -
5000/100 mV
instream 90,000.100 ml.
2%
3. Estimated pollution load--all sources (average FY 72)
Load Accuracy (% ±)
BOD5
TSS
(See Table 4)
pounds/day
80283
83517
+ %
10%
10%
Estimated pollution load reduction required to meet EPA water quality
objectives derived from 2(c) - 2(b):
BODc
TSS*
Required Reduction
( "Z of Table 4)
pounds/day
67810
64675
Accuracy (% +)
± *
10%
10%
5. Reduction firmly committed by FY 72 arid prior year actio'ns:
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
60794
65248
65248
65248
13420
58456
58456
58456
6. Additional reductions to be obtained by FY 73 and FY 74 conrnitmcr.ts:
Year of Actual Redjction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
(See Table 4)
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
BODc
2750*
2750
*To be negotiated
TSS
-
9730
9730
with industry.
-------
r r"i ¦/* a ^ r o i r« n^l 1 11^ ^ aw J -¦ »-¦ ^ l-> ^ ^ —•>•— ^ — i- - -J -
inwi wujCj i 11 put luiiun u i oLiiai CA^nticu.
Year of Actual Increase
BODc
TSS
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
136
272
408
544
570
1140
1710
2280
8. Total reductions to be obtained—sum of 5 and 6 above:
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
1bs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
60794
65248
67998
67998
13420 '
58456
68186
68186
9. Total reductions required—sum of 4 and 7 above:'"
Year of Actual Reduction
FY 73
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
67946
68082
68218
68354
65245
65815
66380
66950
1
10. Year in which minimum acceptable water quality levels are to be achieved—
compare 8 and 9 above:
TSS - FY 75 BOD5 - need additional commitment of 356# during FY 76
(To be determined prior to FY 76).
11. If figures for items 2 through 7 above are not available, please provide
estimate of when they will become available through monitoring and other
activities:
Are items 3, 5, and 6 above derived from detailed discharger inventories?
The best available.
12. Key pollutants, if any, for which a weight or other quantity measure is
not appropriate:
(Note special problems arrd comments).
Figure 10 - Continued
-------
SECTION C
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI SI ,STS SCHEDULE
PAGE 1
1. Type of Plan
o.(_) Sub-Elenent
b.CZDPart. Sub-Elea.
cJZZZlllcS-s-AjCM
2 .Code 9. No
1--
1 Nov. 72
lO^chcdDate
of Cocid.
2. Program Sub-Element Title g i 0 n a 1 Adlll i n i S t r a 10
5. Geographical Area Title
Red River of the North
, aar. » J
3. Sub-Element No.
5T1214
4.^Shecj.t JIo.
6. Geo. Area Code
D 7D1
7.Priority
11*.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Meet with Regional Administrator of Region V to develop a working
agreement between the two Reciions to accomplish a total basin WQM
strategy. .
\
12.
FY 1973
2 ,uX6
13.
FY 1974
a.
b.
' taame«rcr«
14. Prepared by & Date
Cj- 22.-TZ Tkr
gwiniwauiwji ?x> -j.1 -.•"rwfciz-'rrj
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIQ.,
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 2.,
1. Type of Plan
a -i 1 Sub-Element
b.f J Part. Sub-Elem.
c.l ,ineos.Ar.fia
2. Program Sub-Element Title
5. Geographical Area Title
3, Sub-Elecient No.
ZM1A2
t
4.Sheet No.
1 rif 3
6. Geo. Area Code
,Q7Q1
7 .Priority
9. No
10£chedDate
of Copp.
-LL
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
June 76
Bring about-the integration of North Dakota's and Minnesota's Water Quality
-5
Management Plan through inter-agency cooperation.
June 76
Review and monitor development of the Water Quality Management Plan to ful-
fill the requirements of 40CFR 35. .4
jU
June 76
Assist North Dakota in the basin planning activities for the Red River of
the North.
July 73
Review and approve Water Quality Management Plan for Red River of the North
including Fargo SMSA
_L.IL
May 74
Assess impact of new legislation upon Water Quality Management Planning
and the Facilities Management Grants Program.
JiH.
Sep 73
Work with Region V, HUD, N.D., Minnesota and Farqo-Moorhead SMSA to set up
¦-5.Q -j
areawide planning organization,
_50.
Oct 73
Model the Red River of the North using a Simplified Math Model.
Oct 73
Review the results of DFIC's proposed Water Quality Survey of the
Red River and recent wastewater treatment olant improvpmpnts.
1.0
12. FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
a.
b.'
14. Prepared by & Date
TA 9-25-72
15. Rey.ie.i-Gd by L Date '16. A-.y;roved forRPIO jj
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 3.
| 1. Type of
1 a.L_3Sub-
Plan
¦Element
2. Program Sub-Element Title Water Quality Planninn
3. Sub-Element No.
2B3H9
^ rw r *i^ert.~» i ^r-roy.ej ror:-PIO.
3.
1
b.'
a.
b.
< ;
,TA 9-25-72, 1 !_. .. .. ........ ... .
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMI'L. ..MENTS' SCHEDULE
Page 4
1. Type of P.Ian
a -iJ Sub-Elenent
b.CZDPart. Sub-Eletn.
r,.l l»n.
.Code
Xl
9. No.
\
u
a.'wm-rw /vi^i « .»
2. Prograa Sub-Element Title Water Q^ity Planning
5. Geographical Area Title River Of the North
3. Sub-Element No.
2B3149
6. Geo. Area Code
01 o I
105chedDate
?I_ Co^p.
JUN 76
4.Sheet No.
3 of 3
7 -Priority
1L
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Influence N.D. and following municipalities to provide nutrient removal, if such a
need is determined.
-Fargo, N.D. - WW IP
0
.3
~b~! Grafton, N.D. - WWIH imp.
0
.3
c. Wahpeton, N.D. - WWTP Imp. o
~ Valley City, N.D. - WW IP Imp. q"
15
JUN 73
0
Encourage State and municipalities to expedite plant construction
.05
\
l\W \
12.
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
F • .50
o.
a. .75
b.
14. Proj
]
a~ed by & Date
15. Reviewed by L Date
i . i -mir'LC,"1:rr_^- --s-rrn-r" tt
.' UXT-T. "J ^..TUC.'
16.Approved forRPIO I
J
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 5
1. Type of Plan
a -i 1 Sub-Element
b.f J Part:. Sub-Elera.
r..l ir.pn. Ar P3
MUNICIPAL WASTE TREAT
2. Program Sub-Element Title^ENT CONSTRUCTION GRANTS"
5. Geographical Area Title
Red River of the Nort
3.
Mm
-Element No.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
I Of 3
7.Priority
9. No
lO^chedDate
of Comp.
11*.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Conduct preapplication meetings for 7 projects listed on 1 and 5 year needs list
Feb 73
June 75
(See Table 3)
a. Amenia WWTP (1 year needs list)
.2
b. Fargo Interceptor (5 year needs list)
June 75
c. Grafton Interceptor (5 .year needs list)
June 75
d. Grand Forks Interceptor (5 year needs list)
June 75
e. Valley Citv Interceptor (5 year needs list.)
June 75
_£ West Fargn Tnt.prrpptnr (R ypar npprk li<;t)
"7U TH-
(3 of 6)
June 75
g. Grafton Interceptor (5 year needs list)
Complete the processing of construction grant applications and grant awards for 13
projects (See Table 3)
Aug 72
a. Valley City' WWTP Imp.
.3
0
June 73
b. Abercrombie WWTP
Aug 73
c. Grafton WWTP Imp.
1.2
_UL
Auq 73
d. Wahneton WWTP Imp.
12. fY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
I-
b.'
a.
b.
i '¦» »i "..nr- pi.—p ¦- ¦ .. ^ —
1
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .irfENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE I
1. Type of Plan
a -l"l Sub-Element
b.[ J Part. Sub-Elem.
r.l Iflpo. ArpA
Municipal Waste Treatment
2. Program Sub-Element Title Construction Grants
3- No-
4.Sheet No.
2 Of 3
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
3.Code
lO^chedDate
of Conp.
11 .
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Sep 73
e. Fargo WWTP
J.
i .n
Oct 73
Oct 73
Jun 76
f, Fargo Hater Filtration .1
JL2.
Amenia WWTP
1
1.2
Fargo Interceptor
0
3.0
Jun 76
Grafton Interceptor
(3 of 6)
Jun 76
Grand Forks Interceptor
Jun 76
k. Valley City Interceptor
Jun 76
1. Wahpeton Interceptor
Jua ZfL
JD- West Fargn Tnt.prr.ppt.nr
-A
Feb 74
Work v/ith State to improve the quality and frequency of inspections and
0&M surveys .3 .3
\
Oct 73'
Review DFIC's report that results from their survey of several WWTP's along the
Jun 76
main stem of the Red River
.25
Use State program plans to coordinate administration of construction grants
1.25 1.25
1 12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
h 1
b.'
a.
b.
w n '¦*j t-.qjrar1
1 1?-3t f Ji-J. 1 UPtrifJ-'T-wrv-
16.Approved forRPIO
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL.
.iENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 7
1. Type of Plan
n .11 Sub-Element
b. ( J Part. Sub-Elem.
c.rifi pp. Arc?.
Municipal Waste Treatmen
2. Program Sub-Eleaent Title (Construction Grants)
5. Geographical Area Title Red River 0f the North
3. Sub-
nt No.
4.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
W f <
7.Priority
S3 .Code
v\
9. No
10.SchedDate
of Coirp.
JLLv.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
June 76
Update 1 and 5 year needs list
,3
Influence ND and the following municipalities to provide nutrient removal if such
\
June 76
a need is determined,
a. Fargo, North Dakota - WWTP
June 76
b. Grafton, North Dakota
WWTP Imp
June 76
c. Wahpeton, North Dakota
WWTP Imp
June 76
d. Valley City, North Dakota . - WWTP Imp
Encourage state and municipalities to expedite plant
.05
construction.
H
\
j 12.
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
.50
b
I 'TT"*""
.90
b.
TSUSnjLtu cruwa J
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forSPIO 1
Planned Ascomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 8
C
1. Type of Plan
a .1 I Sub-Element
b.dJPart. Sub-Elem.
c.l IHp-Q. Area
2. Program Sub-Element Title
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
5. Geographical Area Title p&(j Rjver 0f the North
3. Sub-Element No.
5T1214
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
7.Priority
J3. Code
$
9. No
lO^chedDate
of Comp.
11*.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Nov 72
Encourage national funding of an environmental film to be used
'1"ne 76
in Region VIII
.25
Distribute to the news media items on environmental issues relating
to the Red River Basin .5
June 76
Determine whether 7 construction grant projects satisfy the
Equal Employment Act requirements
.25
75
\
A
12. FY
L973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO 1
i . .08
b.'
a. 1.0
b.
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL.
JMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 9
1. Type of Plan
nA I Sub-Element
b.( JPart. Sub-Elem,
2. Program Sub-Element Title Construction Grants Adm,
5. Geographical Area Title River of the North
'T*L "^7 «
3. Sub-Eleaent No.
2B8316
6. Geo. Area Code
4.Sheet No
1 Of 1
—i
7.Priority
3.Code
9. No
105chedDate
of Corap.
Process seven new applications and complete seven others
11. PT.ANNF.D ACCOMPLISVTMFNTS
Aug
73
a. Valley City WWTP Imp
.2
.1
\WV
Oct
73
b. Park River Interceptor
.1
0
L\\\
Apr
74
c. Fargo WWTR
.3 .1
Apr
74
d. Fargo Water Treatment
> OLD
.3
May
74
e. Abercrombie WWTP
.3 .1
May
74
f. Wahpeton WWTP Imp.
.3 .1
Jun
74
q. Grafton WWTP Imp.
.3 .1
N\\
Mav
74
h. Amenia WWTP
*
.2
L\\\'
Jun
76
i. Farao InterceDtor
.0
.5
\\\v
Jun
76
i. Grafton InterceDtor
.0
.5
CxV
June
76
k. Grand Forks Interceptor
<
> NEW
0
.R
Jun
76
1. Vallev Citv InterceDtor
n
1
Jun
76
m. Wahpeton Interceptor
0
.2
June
76
n. W. West Fargo Interceptor
0
.5
L\\\
J
i\\\ \
{ 12. FY 197
13.
FY 1974
.16
b.'
a.
,25
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
-Jf-KJ-VJ. J"
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 10
1. Type of Plan
a .L_3 Sub-Element
b.f J Part. Sub-Elem.
f>.| Iflpn . Arpq
2. Program Sub-Element Title
rxzl•^c.uTZ-^-:
0 & M
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3.
Sufflf3
.ent No.
r4.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
Wf
7.Priority
S3. Code 9. No
lO^chedDate
of Conp.
11^
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Conduct 14 0 & M inspections of completed or to be completed WWTP (See Table 3)
Aug 73
a. Valley City WWTP Improvements
.0
.30
Apr. 74
b. Fargo WWTP
.30
Apr. 74
c. Fargo Water Filtration
.30
Mav 74
d. Amen.ia WWTP
.30
May 74
Ahercrombie WWTP
>30
May 74
f. Wahpeton WWTP Improvements
.30
Jun 74
g. Grafton WWTP Improvements
.30
Oct 74
h. Park River Interceptor Ext. Force Main & Lift Station
.30
Jun 76
i. Fargo Interceptor
Jun 76
j. Grafton Interceptor
Jun 76
k. Grand Forks Interceptor
Jun 76
1. Valley City Interceptor
TO T0TT
(3 Of 6)
Jun 76
m. Wahpeton Interceptor
Jun 76
n. West Fargo Interceptor
12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
y. i
Own >.,«¦ ... i
b.'
a.
b.
U^JL'J 'ilutT UmV.C
[f MT ¦¦<11. Tll« —J .1-1 ¦— --I--.-r - 1 l 1 1 1
P ¦ - ¦ * P 1 » j -
¦ » .IT J II" - —
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL. .iMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 11
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI:
IENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 12
nxxiu LCi**
1. Type of Plcn
| a .CiZj Sub-Elcn-.cnt
£ b.CU?nrC. Sub-Elcra.
¦cJ_JHaa.v_^r.c.c
| _ |I05chcdDate
r3.Code |9. N'oJ^f
k ^ ;• —^
»
t
}\\\
^,\A-
k.
K-
I 1
\!
i v,
I^VLL,
f \V3
S\
?\
r._\
" \
f>
KN
?\
c
}-\
i\v\ \
r^1—1
L
June 76
u\x*ir»vz-*•¦ •» -* -*-¦
»> -> r v ft ~ rr» #«. ¦ „ ,, 3. Sub-Elenent No.
2. Progran Sub-Elcnent Tidewater Pollution Source Surk 2B2148
5. Ccosraphiccl Area Title Red River of the North
6.
Gc8?oi
rca Code
4.Sheet No. |
1 of 1
7 .Priority
UL.
PLANNED ACCOK?LIS)?;
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI ENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE
fw
1. Type of Plan
k .! ! Sub-Element:
b.( JParC. Sub-Elem.
' 'Hp.o. Arc,t
'ode
Ksx
\
9. Ko.
•1
10.SchedDate
of Cotnp.
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area TitleRed River of the North
3. Sub-Element No.
3 B 2 124
6. Geo. Area Code
Q7Q1
UL
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
USDI Valley City National Fish Hatchery
4.Sheet No.
1 of 4
7.Priority
Hay 7 3
a. Obtain committment to minimize pollution Toad
k'\ \ \ \
£
J-V
V \|
\ \\l -
\V \
\
Pi 11shurv-firanri Forks
¦1 ii "1 y 74
-fl_. Meet with comnanv ft State tn develop PS st.Hs
n^r 7 4
Jjpyplnn p.fflnpnt rnnrpntrations for . pi ant ..througly
RAPP
Feb 75
c. Obtain a committment letter
Minnkota Power Coop - Grand Forks
.4 0
n 1 -Q
-0-
March 73
\
a. Continue meetings with company to develop effluen^
standards 1.q
\
May 73
b. Obtain committment letter
Vw
^vSL
June 76
12.
FY 1973
13. FY 1974
h
•See 1 a s cb *p a g e
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
Planned Accomplishments
ti yiitt. A"— »-¦—¦»
16.Approved forRPIO
v^n'j Mil .v. tn jjj»"
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAG.
r nm
1. Type of Plan
a.(ZD Sub-Element
b .CUD Part. Sub-Elem.
r..! J.fi.p.o«..Ar.e.a
lO^chedDatc
o£ Cono.
June 73
Sept 73
May 7 3
2. Program Sub-Element TitlcRefuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title Red R -f vero f North
3. Sub-Element No.
3B2124
4.Sheet No.
2 Of 4 '
6. Geo. Area Code
2-L2J
JUL
I'LANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Otter Tail Power Co. - Wahpeton
a. Develop effluent criteria through RAPP
b. Obtain committment letter
US PI Baldhill Dam Nat'1 Fish Hatchery - Valley City
a. Obtain committment to minimize pollution load
7.Priority
.4
0
.6
.4
American Crystal Sugar, Drayton
March 73
a. Meet with company to resolve conflict over ROD'; <;t-H
.90
JL
June 7 3
b. Obtain art-other committment letter
30 0
FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
Sec b) ast page.
a.
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
iyj!',1 ^uja: 1-ji ¦ ii_ ti 'hhdw^uT jmii >tiw
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE u>
1* Type of Plan
a -i~! Sub-Element
b .( ]?nrt. Sub-Elcm.
—-C.l. ,]n.fio...Ar.pn
¦Rt*:9urcrc
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
rvj
3. Sub-Element No.
3B2124
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
3 of 4
7 .Priority
K\\>
9. No
10,SchedDate
of Conp.
UL_
PLANNED ACCOKPLISHMENTS
Feb 73
June 73
Armour Food - West Fargo
a. Negotiate with company to have them use the city sewer
b. Obtain commitment letter
.90
,20
0
8
s\V^
Jan 73
Mar 73
a. Continue negotiations with company to define effluent criteria
b. Obtain commitment letter
.4
.60
Jun 73
Review the water quality management plan for Red River Basin and
10
11
June 75
May 73
Fargo-Moorhead SMSA
Establish a joint monitoring system with Region V to assess impacts
.4
American Crystal Sugar, Moorhead
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesotii and industry to agree upon
effluent limitations
1.0
0
of RAPP activities in Minnesota portion of Red River Basin. Continue program. 0 5.0
FY 1973
13. FY 1974
Sei^ast page,
mcttouocMCBKMai
a.
b.
¦ tBOcmncri
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
MTtW ¦llll ¦1 XS -
Planned Accomplishments
16.Approved forRPIO
M W* J
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI
'EKTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 16
mnnrmx
I 1. Type of Plan
| a .{_~ Sub-Element
| b.f JPart. Sub-Elea.
r.I 1 On. Arf>a
2. Program Sub-Element Title Refuse Act Permits
5. Geographical Area Title Recj River 0f the North
3. Sub-Eler.ar.t No.
3B2124
}
6. Geo.
Q7Q1.
Code
r4.Sr.eit ;io. i
r 4 of 4 S
"|7.Priority ' j
3. Code 9. No
11
lOSchedDate
of Comp.
1L
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
July 74
b. Obtain commitment let.t.pr fWnrk with Region V)
0 I
12
13
American Crystal Sugar, E. Grand Forks
May 73
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesota, and industry to agree upon effluent
1 imitations
July 74
b. Obtain commitment letter (Work with Region V)
American Crystal Sugar, Crookston
May 73
a. Meet with Region V, Minnesota, and industry to agree upon effluent
1.0
1imi tati ons
-UQ-
July 74
b. Obtain commitment letter (Work with Region V)
_0_
0
14
15
16
June 75
c. Monitor stream and effluent to detect pollution levels
Sept 73
June 76
June 76
Data Processing of Permits
JUL
1.0
-UL
_L£_
2.2
12.
FY 1973
13,
FY 1974
1.0
a- 1.0
b.
14. Prepared by S Date
15. Reviewed bv c- Date ¦ 1c .P.norovad for?-?-3
.1.
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOM JMENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 1
1. Type of Plan
a / I Sub-Element
bJ JPart. Sub-Elem.
r .1 ! Hr»n . Arpa
ituijn
2. Program Sub-Elenervt Title Envi ronmental Impact
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Element No,
¦ 2B6117
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
4.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
7.Priority
13. Code
9. No.
1
lOjSchedDate
of Comp.
JL1*_
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
JUN 73
Review contents of Water Quality Management plans for Red River Basin
.3
and Fargo-Moorhead SMSA
JUN 76
Evaluate environmental assessment for the water quality management plans, Red
River Basin and Fargo-Moorehead SMSA & 7 construction grant applications 1.5 1.0
a. Amenia WWTP
b. Fargo Interceptor
c. Grafton Interceptor
d. Grand Forks Interceptor
e. Valley City Interceptor
A
f. Wahpeton Interceptor
g. West Fargo Interceptor
A
JUN 76
Coordinate with Bureau of Reclamation in the development of the EIS
for the Garrison Reservoir Water Project.
d
i \\ \
14. Prepared by & Date 15. Revleved by & Date 16.Approved forRPIQ
12,
FY 1973
13,
FY 1974
.13
b.
a. .11
b.
TA
9-P5-72
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL IMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE
1. Type of Plan
o.C_USub-Element
b.dD Part. Sub-Elem.
I tiJ lO.o. Arm
2. Program Sub-Element Title Water Quality Standards
3. Sub-Element No.
2B1143
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
[3 .Code
9. No.
lO^chedDate
of COCTP.
11. ILANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1.
OCT 73
Provide standards input to water quality model , develop & use model 1.2 2.0
2
JUN 73
Review N.D.' standards and determine need for changing the use
classifications. Check compatibility with Minnesota Water
Quality Standards and pending legislation. 5 0
|X\X
\\v
I
\\\
\Y\ A!
3 2. FY 1973
13. FY 1974 14. Prepnrai? by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
•1. .15 b.
a. .16 b. TA 9-22-12
-rr-w'-m ¦ » 1 ¦¦¦. w«j'm r»i yLf— yuKwnrtmrjor^atnua -ii ;-n.. ,L.mi
L-UJL-'~«Lti-T*.. zrtJm-aor-i^u _ji ljmlil'ii
Planned Accomplishments
-------
planned'accomplishments schedule
PAGE 19.
1. Type of Plan
aSub-Element
b.1 ]Part. Sub-Elem
c.l .inp.n. A.r.fV..
105chedDate
of Cocip .
Water Pollution lontrc
^ 2. Program Sub-Element Title Agency Grants
Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
ReviewIC survey report and determine whether State 1 and 5 year hppHc i-ict
to be c Fudged.
Review, coor^nate, and approve N. D. State Program Plan 1.25 1.25
3- s264ft5"ent Ko-
4.Sheet No.
1 nf 1
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
—
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
.3
\ \ \
12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Aoproved forRPIO
i. .13 ' |b.
& • . 15
b.
TA 9-?;'-72
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPL'. .IMENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 20
-------
PLANNED ACCOKPI 1MENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 21
1. Type of Plan
a Sub-Element
b.( J Part. Sub-Elem.
r.J ICen. A ren
u"jr_"ui|Pi. inuniJH
2. Program Sub-Eltraent Title Water Quality Enforcemenl
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
Iftf I -¦¦¦
3. Sub-g|^^r.t No.
A.Sijeei^. JiO.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
3.Code
lO^chedDate
of Comp.
11*.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
JUN 73
Review Water Quality Management Plan for the Red River Basin and
Fargo-Moorhead SMSA.
.3
.0
Influence N.D. and the following municipalities to provide nutrient removal if such
a need is determined,
JUN 75
a. Fargo, N.D. - WWTP
.2
it
b. Grafton, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
,15
w
c. Wahpeton, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
Y
x
ii
d. Valley City, N.D. - WWTP Imp.
SEP 74
Reconvene Enforcement Conference & Publish Report
5.0
3.0
JUN 76
Follow-up on recommendations coming from the enforcement
2.5
Conference,
JUN 73
Follow-up on the compliance schedule of Fargo's 180-day notice
30
.2
JUN 76
Determine necessity of enforcement action for Drayton and other
rXv\i
possible potential 180-day notices (e.g. Drayton)
1.5
1.4
12. FY 1973
13.
FY 1974
a.
14. Prepared by & Date
TA 9-22-72
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.Approved forRPIO
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACC0MPL1H ENTS' SCHEDULE
PAGE 22
1. Tvpe of Plon
a .CD Sub-EIenent
b .f ]Par t. Sub-Elcm.
?3. Cod <
\
9. No.
8
v\
10,SchcdDatc
ol-Co-p.
JUL 74
JUN 76
2. Progran Sub-Elcaent Title Water Quality Enforcement
5. Ccogrophical Area Title 'Red River of the North
3.
-Elenent No.
4.Sj}ee£ £o.
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7.Priority
11
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Assist Enforcement in obtaining commitment "letters for 11 industries
2.0
.6
Evaluate the' results of S&A1s.monitoring of the stream and effluent
for the 11 industries .from which commitments were obtained.
2.0
b^J
£
\
; \\ \ m
I 12. FY 1973
L.
,77
b.*
13. FY 1974
.91
b.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
Planned Accomplishments
16.Approved forfvPTO,
¦ IU 1 JV.'I1 I 19
w
J
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPMISKMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE '23
I I. Typs of Picn
vvn or rTzn
CDSub-ElcT.ent 2. Progran Sub-Elcncnt TitleTechnical Support & Assist
b .! J Per t. Sub-Elea.
p J "1 C p ^ . A P
5. Gcogrcphiccl Area Title Red River of the North
3. Sub-Elenent No.
2B5154
6. Geo. Area Code
). Ar
0701
A.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
7.Priority
LOjjchcdDatc
Cong,
PLANNED ACCOKPLISKXENTS
Coordinate with and assist DFIC in a stream survey that is intended to see if in-stream
water quality has improved as a result of improvements 'to certain wastewater treatment
plants. 0.5 0
Supplement the DFIC Survey to determine the'water quality impact of subsequent actions
I
for improving water quality. 0
4.0
Conduct a water quality survey to determine a nutrient balance of the Red River System.
10
Review Water Quality f'.anageinont Plan for Red River Basin and Fargo-Ncorhead
SliSA.
.3
0
—
L -04
FY 197.3
b.'
i ¦>
1 J ,
FY 1974
a.
1.2
\F-
niiVirrrr
irrr" wsnn
14. Prepared by & Data
15. Revievod by & Date
~-l
36.Approved forRPIO.E
1
I
Planned ~A<: : ocplIshnucrvts
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGu 24
1. Type of Plan
n.(! Sub-Element
2. Program Sub-Element Title water Quality Monitorinq
3. Sub-Element No.
2B2147
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
bJTlPart. Sub-Elem.
c.1 iHeo. Area
5. Geographical Area Title Red River of the North
6. Geo. Area Code
0701
7 .Priority
8.Code
9. No.
10£chedDate
of Como.
"
11 . PLANNED ACCOKPLISHI'^TS
1
FFR 73
/
Supplement'O&M effort to assure effective monitnrinn nf thp u/afpr Quality
Impact of WWTP improvements and/or construction. -2 .0
\nS\"
2
JUN 76
Work with Enforcement and Permits Branches to effectively monitor effluent
discharged from industrial sources. .0 2.5
<
s
J
!
s
\\^
I
i
NSS
i
\\\x
.
1
\\\
!
\w \
j|
12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date lo.Anrjrovac? rorRPIO i
a. .02 • |b.
a. #21 b.
. ¦¦ T--- .w 1HJ ¦ Jl 11 -IT- HriTWi.rfrtTWrt
-.72
! I
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANKED ACCOMPLI""MENTS SCHEDULE
page25
1. Type of Plan
aSub-Element
b .(_ 1 Par C. Sub-Elem.
f-.l IHpo. Arf
S.Code 9.No.
105chedDate
of Conp.
June 76
2. Program Sub-Element Title Manpower Planning
5. Geographical Area Title ^ecj f::fver pf the North
-T ih.i**-
3. Sub-Element No.
2B7161
6. Geo. Area Code
07 01
1L.
PLANNED ACCOMPLI SJIHENTS
Work, with State on developing manpower planning function
.2
4.Sheet No.
1 of 1
7.Priority
\
June 76
In-house manpower planning - employment and training project .5 .5
K
FY 1973
b."
13.
FY 1974
.06
b.
TA
od by & Date
15. Reviewed bv & Date
16.Approved for&PIO^
-22-72
¦ li i - .rmi l1 ji*zrrm—y-MLiarn' 'tt.'fHim
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE 26
1. Type of Plan
a / 1 Sub-Element
b.( iPart. Sub-Elem.
C.l JfiEQu. Area
105chedDate
of Corno.
1"np 7fi
APR 74
2. Program Sub-Element Title Direct traini
ng - Water
5. Geographical Area Title RpH Rivpr of the North
3.
|yb-Eler.ent No.
:B7
'160
6. Geo. Area Code
1L.
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
a. Fargo WWTP
A.Sheet No.
1 Of 1
7.Priority
Assist 0&M (2B8163) on the inspections of completed municipal wast.pwat.pr
facilities projects (14) .05
0
^15
.05
APR 74
J UN 74
OCT 72
MAY 74
b. Fargo Water Treatment
c. Grafton WWTP Imp.
d. Park River Interceptor
e. Amenia WWTP
_Q5_
J2L
M5-
MAY 74
_L Aberr.rnmhip WWTP
q. Wahpeton WWTP Imp.
.05
Valley City WWTP Imp.
i. Fargo Interceptor
.05 {
j. Grafton Interceptor
-4
k. Grand Forks Interceptor
1. Valley City Interceptor
H.
.JLL
(3 of 6)
m. Wahpeton Interceptor
n. W. Fargo Interceptor
13.
FY 1974
a.
b'.
14. Prepared by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date ? 16 . Approved forSPIO J
Planned Accomplishments
-------
PLANNED ACCOMPLI fENTS SCHEDULE
PAGE
1. TyjQe of Plan
a -[> Sub-Elenent
b .( J Par C. Sub-Elcia.
r J J On-. Arpff
9. No.
105chedDate
of Conn,
Dec 72
Jul 73
2. Program Sub-Element Title Operator Training - Water 3* s^7f^§ment No
5. Geogr&phical Area Title Rec| River of the North
-*¦ * >1 ii*T-n
6. Ge
8? of
rea Code
PLANNED ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Monitor training course in Wahpeton
Monitor training course in Grand Forks
.3
.3
0
4. -|No
7.Priority
June 76
June 76
Continue training support in Red River
Coordinate Field Study Training Program
.4 1.0
.1
\
t-
12. FY 1973
13. FY 1974
14. Prepare^} by & Date
15. Reviewed by & Date
16.At>t>roved forRPIO
.09
b.
a. .09
b.
lujr r/amw
TA 9-2'2-72
Planned Accomplishments
-------
on i*
r an
• 3ASIH /iCCO'.lPLISI.'i.iEllTS: SEiMI-A::?JUALPREPARATIONS !/ TCi'lESREPORT
DATE SUBMITTED:
RECIOU. VHI
.HALF, 19 JUL
— PnFPAPrn RY: Terry Anderson,
General Engineer
BAS!iT Red River of the r,'orth
TEL
o-:
c>
(Manic)
(Title)
APPflOVEQ 3Y:.
liisir.e)
(Title)
[Initials)
MILESTONES
DATE t!iLESTO!iE
atta:;;ed or to i;i:
ATTAINED
LIST AiiY f.ilSSKJG 0ft INADEQUATE Pi:FPARATJ0!iS Ail J INDICATE .
FC3 EACH PERIOD if! CUIiHEilT STATUS. DISCUSS THOSE NEEDING
IIEADG'JAPJEP.S ATTEIITIOII, i.'ICLUCi.'.'G REASONS, COiVlXTIYE
f.'EASiiP.ES, AsiD implications rc:i future progress, use
SUPPLEMENTARY SHEETS AS IIFCESSAKY.
•CRITICAL V.'Q DATA CSTAIiiED No
(instream Water Quality needs to b'.j correlated rare
{closely with those times when discharges are permitted.
1
Cr.mCAl EFFLOEU DATA OGTAIuED no
Ilorth Dakota requires ho'.dirifj of waste during ice cover.
However, insufficient data-exists that identifies what
',lun Innrlinos nr.cur dwriiu: di sriiarne.
KECE SSA.fi Y fASHELCiG COMPLETED NO
OCT 1972
J'lOdel is underway.
i:CF!7FL'LLY -EVELCTTD PLAN'S FCP. AI:EA
at.:r.l»VcQ a::d i:o r,cv!Sic:;s ;;ecDZ0 no
JULY 1, 1973
Water Quality Management Plan cn schedule - money and
time will prevent detail analysis of all waste sources.
s[/.ie pr.:cr;iiiES fop, i s, 5 year ;::eos
cq;:; on:;:o with accc:.:;;lis;:::[nt pla:i
YES
Yi
EfFLLT!;! GL'iDELilxS EOPv CltlliCAL SOURCES
M-"| f »¦; c
r> < ¦¦ I... i. I k.
NO
v.'Q cr.iiEciA cov:nc:c all critical pap.a^.etep.s
iii iCV£DJ!:'::?Ji3 ^['7S!i3::$ •:[LS£D YES
use C:'Si:NATfo;:s a::d !:o:;i::ci!AiJAT!OH
fc.i a:;[ a waters yes
a;'?;:gv;d a::d i:o ;cv!S!o::s !:ieded
i,'.;pif.:[::iAii5:; schedules cover;::: ti:e area's
dischargers approved a;:o.cc^ormid. with.
' rTi'
i i !j
;c;S:.;L|!T PLAN
Yl. S
Need effluent guidelines for Ariuour Food and Union
Stockyards in W.Fargo,Minrikota Power Coop in Grand Forks,
TtrVt.—B-L-te-r4—rrrS—!—rt>Wf-'r— 9•?-. l"S—W-.rrrj¦ ' 1 -¦ 1 ¦¦
!Changes will be needed if national policy will be to
j crpgnrdcr u 11 Hiem,,;, Lj recreational classi fi cation.
t
1965 Enforcement Conference established -the dates.
P..J-M- J.
-------
SECTION D
Point Source Loads § Locations
-------
RIVER BASIN RED
WASTEWATER SOURCE American Crystal Sugar-Drayton
RIVER MILE 20b.4 Ked
PV/PN
JZl
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
TDS
TSS
NH3-N
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic Metals
Sulfides
• .Other Toxics
Present
Load
19 MGD Ave,
76 MGD Max
7.6
46 Mm.
72 Max. 5
415 mg/1;
65,794#/Diy
1078 mg/1;
170,9C6#/lj
102 mg/1;
16,171 ff/Dd
15.20 mg/1
2410#/Day
:id
ND
ND
|llot Reportec]
nd
Not Reportec]
MD
r;A
NA
0.65 mg/1
lay
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
7.5 MGD Ave.
63 MGD Max.
63,044=?/Day
13,420#/Day
11.5 MGD Ave.
12.5 MGD Max.
160794
13420
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
May 75 x 106/Ton
"OT
(2) lat. 4S-36-00
long. 97-09-00
"TIT
TABLE 1
FY 73.74- Commits
73 / 4 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76 173
Total Commits
' (3) + (4)
75 75
2750
W
1ST
•i
None, Recycle
60794
,13420
11.5 MGD. Ave.
12.5 MGD Ave.
2750
75 x 106/Ton
(6)
COMMENTS
Type of Facility - Sugar Beet
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirem£:nts
1 BOD5 = 0.5#/Ton sliced beets - EPA requirements. ^10^ .ntsla
2* Fecal coliform = 75 x 10°/ton of sliced beets - EPA requirements; or 41 x 10' /day over intake
3.'
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)
7T
~n 75"
76
7.5 MGD Ave.
63 MGD Max
63,044#/Day
13,420#/Day
(7)
PV
-------
I; 1VI i: I'A'i I li Red
HA'. I ii i 1 li SUUKU. Armour Food-West Fargo
i: 1VI R MiLE 25.1 Sheyenne River
P7/Pil 7/2
iAm i:
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Peq'd
FY 72 Commits
I'Y 73 , 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA l)bj .
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 "6
73 74 75 76
PV
Flow, MGD
.017
Est. 10% (.0017)
PH
7.6
N/A
N/A
Temp, °F
D0D5
TDS
TSS
nh3-h
Org - i-.1
45 W
68 S
54 mg/1;
5.4#/day
1597 mg/1
159.7 #/day
26 mg/ 1,
2.6 #/day
1.0 mg/1
0.10 if/day
N/0
No obj . as yet.
Probable connect
to San. Sewer.
Will locate exact
location of dis-
charge to sewer.
None
.5 #/day
15.9 3/day
.26 #/day
.01 a/day
1
1
1
1
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
1.63 mg/1
.16 #/day
115
.016 ir/day
11.5 #/day
Total Coli.
19,300
1 ,9300/day
3
Grease & Oil
Toxic Petals
84 mg/1,
8.4 =/day
N/A
8#/day
Other Toxics
N/A
COiiliEi'J i S :
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1 .
2.
3.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
7
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCEFargo (Construction underway) WWTP
RIVER MILE 441 Red
TABLE I
Totcl Cor.^rii ts
sauct1on
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4) | (2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75
73 74 75 76 i 73 7A 75 /c
10 MGD Design
i
Flow, MGD
7.0
>
PH
N/D
,
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5 12000#/[
3500 #/Day
2044 #/day
2300 #/day (74)
[l 9.2 19.2 19.2 19.2
2300 2300 0 C 2063 19.2 19.2 19.2
i
TDS
N/D
i
t i
TSS /14040#/q
4200 "
2449 11
2449 #/day (74)
22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6
2449 2449 0 0 2472 22.6 22.6 22.6^
nh3-n
N/D
t
i
; t
Org-N
N/D
i
Total-N
N/D
i ,
1 ;
Total-P
N/D
:
i
i i
; i
S 1
Fecal Coli.
N/D
I
j
j
' ;
j f
Total Coli .
N/D
i
j
1
Grease & Oil
N/A
i
i
1
Toxic Metals
N/A
I1
Other Toxics
N/A
i
1
!
I 1
1 r\ / 1 ,
COlvOTS:
Type of Facility - Trickling Filter followed by lagoons (580 acres)
SresentPpEE. IS (yr'20°0)) 1130 PE/Yr. = 192.1 #B0D5/Day, Q =
Effluent Requirements 1972 1973 1 974 1975
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD- 1 456#/d 1479#/d 1501#/d 1524#/d
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 1751#/d 1775#/d 1801#/d 1832#/d
.11 mgd. increase/yr.
1976
BOD incr. = 19.2#/day
3.
Q = I10D 7.11
7.22
7.33
1547#/d
1860#/d
7.44
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate) ,.
*This project is a special exception because of enforcement proceedings.
-------
P. IV E R HAS IN Red
WASTlI.'ATlR SOURCE Union Stockyards-W. Fargo
RI/lR IiILE 25.1 -Shpypnnp Rivor _
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
| Expected Incr.
(3) +
(4)
(2)
+
(5)
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74
75 76
73
74
75
76
Flow, MGD
.917
1.0
10%
PH
8.3
6.5 to 8.5
Temp, °F
bod5
TDS
41 w
69 s
10 mg/1
782 #/day
1293 9900
572 #/day
None
None
78 78 78 78
990 990 990' 990
None
550
990
78
990
78
990
78
990
TSS
460 5000
4,750 sVday
4750 #/day
500 500 500 500
4750
#/day
5250
500
500
500
nh3-n
6 54.6
5 5 5 5
5
5
5
5
Org-N
IV D
Total-N
N/D
1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
Total -P
1.8 13.85
Fecal Coli.
360/100 ml.
Total Coli.
965/100 ml.
5000/100 ml.
Grease & Oi1
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Othnr Toxics
N/A
PV
UT
COMMITS:
(W
"W
Lat. 46-50-45 Long. 46-53-30
Type of Facility Holding sen washing, trough washing, water trough
Design P.E. ran over.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenents
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Company and EPA are currently working on commits.
Better conservation practices should decrease waste loads.
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Farao. N.D. Water Filtration Plant
P.IVER MILE 441 Red
TABLE I
Total Com^iits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
12) + (5) i
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76 !
Flow, .'!GD
14.0
! !
PH
7.0
!
) i
: I
Temp, °F
N/D
1 1
i |
bod5
0
' /
; i
TDS
N/D
?
i I
TSS
40,000 #/day
36,500 #/day
40,000 ir/day
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
40,000 #/day !
1
iih3-n
N/D
! i
i I
Org-N
N/D
j i
i i
!
Total-N
N/D
! I
Total-P
N/D
!
1
Fecal Coin.
N/D
1
1
!
Total Coli.
N/D
i
1
1
Grease & Oil
N/A
:
i
i !
Toxic Petals
N/A
1 1
1
1 1
]
1 !
Other Toxics
N/A
i
i '
i 1
PV
WT
"Tsy
DNA
DNA
5.0
I DNA
72)(3)
COMr'ENTS:
Type of Facility - Sludge handling facilities for water filtration plant.
Design P.E. - 53,365
Present P.E. - 35,000
Effluent Requirements
1.
2. 30 mg/1 SS-3500 #/day
3.
77)
Type Sewer
5.0
Separate)
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Minnekota Power Coop. Grand Forks
RIVER MILE Red 298 Red
PV/PN 5/5
TABLE I
Total Cornnits
Total Reduction P'.<
(2)
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.]'.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 7T
FY 73, 74 Commits ! Expected Incr.
w
73 74 75 76 73 74 75 76 i 73 74 75 75 j 72
(3 J
7^ 75
/o ,
Flow, I1GD
PH
Temp, °F
B0D5
TDS
TSS
nh3-n
Org-ii
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coll.
Total Coll .
Grease & Oil
Toxic lietals
Other Toxics
30 mgd
60 w
85 s
6 mg/1
1500 sVday
200 mg/1,
50,000 #/day
20 mg/1 ,
5,000 #/day
0.2 mg/1
50 1b/day
N/D
N/D
0.2 mg/1
50 #/day
N/A
N/D
N/A
N/A
N/A
No increase unless
plant expands fac.
4980 #/day
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
None
0 0 0 0
0 0 4980 0
' 0
0
0 0
4980 0
• 0 0 0
4980 0 0
rn (21 [37
Lat. 47-56-25 Long. 97-2-40, steam-electric plant.
(5)
I
i
0 j 3
0 , 1
DO'v'EilTS:
Type of Facil ity
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Reauirements
1.
2.
->
w
(5)
UY
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Otter Tail Power Co. Wahepton
RIVER MILE Red 545.2 Red
5/5"
TABLE I
Total Cor.iits
Tone 1 Re duct-.on
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
Exnected Ircr.
(3) + (4i : '.2) - ,5; .
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76 1 73 7* 75 7c
Flow, I1GD
14.3
i ;
i !
PH
8.4
' i
Temp, °F
45 w
j
90 s
| !
bod5
7 mg/1—833 #/c
ay
TDS
210 mg/1 —250.00C
; ;
#/day
l
TSS
6 mg/1 — 714 #/da>
No EPA Obj. de-
None
No increase unless
N/A N/A j
veloped as of 9/13
plant size is incr.
nh3-n
. 18 mg/1
: !
21 #/day
Org-N
N/D
11.
Total-N
N/D
I i I
Total-P
N/D
: 1 1
; !
Fecal Coli.
N/D
> 1
! i ;
Total Coli.
N/D
i i : :
!l!i
Grease & Oil
N/A
i
i 1 i
: ! i
Toxic Metals
N/A
i i
Other Toxics
N/A
i i
rr-S 7c\ ¦¦ I1\
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - Steam-Electric Plant
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Lat. 46-17-18 Long. 96-36-03
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Pi 11sbury-Grand Forks
RIVER MILE Red 298 Red
PV/PN 3/6
TABLE I
Total Cor^Tits
Total Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
1 Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2; + (5) :
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
! 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75 :
Flow, MGD
0.23
j
PH
8.1
1
Temp, °F
68°F
|
bod5
TDS
TSS
nh3-n
Org-N
20 mg/1
37.2 #/day
4848 mg/1
9160 #/day
10 mg/1
19.1 #/day
.44 mg/1
.75 #/day
N/D
No EPA objective
None
None
No increase
expected.
i
1
N/A
N/A j
!
I
i
i
i
I
I
1
f
Total-N
N/D
!
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
.026 mg/1
.050 #/day
N/D
i
j
1
f
j
i
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
j
i
t
1
Toxic Petals
N/A
1
I
1
i
Other Toxics
N/A
. . I
i
j
1
1
i
Try
CO: TENTS:
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
73}
Lat. 47-56-40
Long. 97-03-20
Water used for air conditioner cooling only.
(4T
T5T
(5)
TT
-------
RIVER BASIN RR
-------
RIVER BASIN Red Taft
WASTEWATER SOURCE USDI-Baldhil1 Dam National Fish Hatchery-Val 1 ey City
RIVER MILE Sheyenne River 248 Valley City
PV/PN
LE I
iota! Comrcits
Tcta'
-¦.edjction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr. j (3) + {£)
I \2; -r \Z}
'.teste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 7c : 73 74 75 75
I 73 74 75 It ¦
Flow, MGD
11.5 x 105 gal/
yr.
I ! :
1 >
PH
-8.4
! !
Temp, °F
39 w
85 s
1
bod5
TDS
6 mg/1
.15 ?/day
0.1 .02 #/da
No objectives.
y
No commits
None
None unless Hatchery None
size is increased, j
None j
j
TSS
25 mg/1 - 6.55
#/day
i : !
nh3-n
0.06 mg/1 - .01E
#/day
i ¦ i
! , !
Org-N
N/D
1 : !
i i i
Total-N
N/D
' J 1
i ! ;
Total-P
0.20 mg/1 - .052
5 #/day
I >
i ! i
Fecal Coli.
N/D
! ! :
Total Coli.
N/D
i ! '¦
i |
Grease & Oil
N/A
i
;
Toxic 'fetals
N/A
j
i
i
Other Toxics
N/A
!
!
(47
Discharge is intermittent.
757
W
COMMENTS:
lype of Facil ity
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1.
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
Fish Hatchery Lat. 47-02, Long. 098-05
(7)
-------
RIVER BASIN Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Ahprrnmhie (plant new under construction)
nncn '' T I Z c\ _ J
TABLE
?. ¦'.'ER
P'.'/PN
ILt mil Red
2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Flow, :tgd
PH
Temp, °F
E0D5 44.2
TDS
TSS 520
t!H3-n
Org-N
Total-N
Total-P
Fecal Coli.
Total Coli.
Grease & Oil
Toxic Petals
Other Toxics
Present
Load
.096
7
N/0
132.6 #/day
(150 mg/1)
156 #/day
190 mg/1
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/D
N/A
N/A
N/A
TO"
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
to Meet EPA Qbj.
m 74 75 76"
112.8 §/day
132 #/day
"T2I"
::;:e:its;
Type of Facility Lagoons (3 acres)
Design P.E. 350 - 1990
Present P.E. 260 - 1990
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (208) - 19.8 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (2502) - 24.0 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (OdWffltKriWWl or Separate)
FY 72 Commits
118.8 0
143.4 0
13T
FY 73, 74 Commits i Expected Incr._ 1 (3) + I^T
Fetal Co7~its Tocil Redaction PV
11) ~ 15 ;
73 74 75 76 ; 73 74 75 75 I 73 7* 75 75_
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0
0
73 74 /5 7o
118.8 0 0 0
112.8 0 0 0 ; 1.0
j 0.5
0 ¦ 1 43 .4 0 0 0 :132 0 0 0 ; 1.0
W
T57
TeT
TtT
2.5
-------
Rh'iR IV,SI
Red
'.¦.'AS il.I.MER SOURCE/ flmenia
Rll'LK iilLE 426 (R.R. -'confluence w/Rush River)
PV/Pil 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
COr'I iEi.'TS:
Present
Load
Flow, r'.GD
.011
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
17 #/day
T0S
N/D
TSS
20#/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org-il
H/D
Total -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Giw.e & Oil
N/A
Toxic i'.etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TTT
Pres. Reduc I'-jq'd
to Meet EPA OI>j.
14.7 i?/day
17.2 #/Day
UT
TABLE I
FY 72 Conduits
73 7T
"75 76
0 15.0 0
0 18
0 0
13T
FY 73, 74 Commits
"¦'3 74 75 76
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Comtiii ts
TTT + PTT
73 74 75 76
15.3 0
18 0
(5T
W
of Facility - Present facilities - septic tanks, proposed future facilities - 2-cell waste stabil ization lagoon system.
Design P.E. - 150
Present P.E. - 100
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (208) - 2.3 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (256.2) - 2.8 #/day
3.
Type Sewer or Separate) No storm sewer.
Total Reduction
ICU
73 74
14.7 0
17.2 0
+ T5T
75
1 Ei
~UT
76
1 .0
0.5
1 .0
DNA
2.5
-------
I,AS IN
Red
WASTEWATER SOURCE Cava! ier (assume 90% removal)
RIVER MILE 196 Rush R. to Red to mouth
PV/PN 2.5/7
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres'! Reduc. I'.oq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits | I Y 73, 74 Commits
737475 76
73 74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
(3) + (47
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2) + (5T~
73 74 75
76
PV
Flow, MGD
.48 mgd
PH
N/0
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
70.5 #/day
(18 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
TSS
82.5 #/day
(22 mg/1)
NH3-U
N/D
Org-^
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Col i .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TT7
127
137
147
COMMENTS:
Tyne of Facility - 2-cel 1 waste stabilization lagoon system (15.5 acres)
Design P.E. 1830 - 1992 (24.9 PE/Yr) lineal incremental growth
Present P.E. T 3S1
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 tng/1 - BOD - 208 - 99.9
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 250.2 - 120.0 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (gBniwiRjexixxir Separate)
48 #/day (est.)
50 #/day (est.)
3o not exceed ef-
fluent allowances.
157
167
W
No significant impact. Is not developed in Tables III & IV.
Code 1 will be used to indicate this fact on remainder of
table.
1.0
0.5
1.0
DNA
2.5
-------
i /; l' I /. -in _ Red
, •, . I i '."."v 11 !! Sl'URLL Drayton
¦iVLi: [;il.C 208 Red
mi;11: i
2.577"
Total Commits
Total Reduction
PV
ITT
(27
ttt
Ms to Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. :V'q'd
to Meet EPA 0!jj.
FY 72 Commits
[" I'Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
.'3 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, I1G0
.33
PH
N/D
Temn, °F
N/D
BODc
55.8 ir/day
0
0
0
.15 .15 .15 .15
0
0
1.0
(20.3 mg/1)
TDS
fl/D
.5
TSS
65.7 ir/day
0
0
0
.17 .17 .17 .17
0
0
1.0
24 mg/1
IIH3- N
N/D
Org- II
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Tota 1 -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease 8 Oil
N/D
DNA
Toxic lietals
N/A
Oilier Toxics
N/A
1
wr
w
w
2.5
2 eel 1 lagoon system
155
.6 PE/Vr -1.5 #/day
CO'ii'CilTS:
Type of Facility - 10 acre
Design P.E. 1250 ultimate (1990)
Present P.E. 1095
Effluent Requirerients
1. 25 mg/1 - 208 - 68.6 #/day - 1976 load to stream does not exceed 68.6 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - 250.2 - 82.5 ff/day - 1976 load to stream does not exceed 82.5 #/day
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
CODE 1
-------
RIYU [;ASirW Red
'.•.'"Oin.'AlER SOURCE FaTnrounTr
RIVER MILE 462 RicT
PV/Pil 275/7
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. I.eq'd
to Meet EPA Ubj.
FY 72 Commits
737475 76
FY 73, 74 Commits
73
74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
73 74 75
76
Total Reduction pv
(2) - 'C1 ' ~
73 74 75
76
Flow, MGD
.12
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
21.0 #/day
20 mg/1
TDS
N/D
TSS
27.7 #/day
27 mg/1
nh3-n
N/D
Org-r;
N/0
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
~rn (21 f3T
co;;;:e;jts:
Type of Facility - Lagoon system, 2 cells (5.20 acres)
Design P.E. 612 - 1992 \
Present P.E. 462 i8-3 PE/Yr
Effluent Requiregents
1 . 25 mg/1- - BOD - 25.5 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 30.9 #/day
3.
Type Sewer- (WOfMiWeixgft Separate)
W
T5f
(67
UT
1 .0
.5
1 .0
2.5
CODE 1
-------
I; Villi Red
'i 1.H SOUInCL Grafton
TABLE I
I i .I.:-: i'.ILE 220 R.Park to Red to mouth
l>,'/Pil 2.577
Total Conimi ts
Total Reduction
727
T&T
PV
Waste Pr'iiMmeter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc i jq'd
to Meet EPA C'bj .
FY 72 Commits
| 1 Y 73 , 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, i'GD
5.7 MGD
1
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
1 740 #/day
555 #/day
570 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Negligible
570 0 0 0
555 0 0 0
TDS
N/D
TSS
2088 #/day
666 #/day
666 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Negligible
666 0 0 0
666 0 0 0
fiH3-U
N/D
Orcj-N
N/D
Total -f'J
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & 0-1
N/A
Toxic lletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
, . i
i
1.0
.5
1.0
lJNA
COiSrlEi.'TS:
Tyoe of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 1185 #/yr.
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 1425 #/Yr.
3.
Type Sewer Separate]
^ nnn Talnr,Ja900n y * 0 ^14° acres) lagoon cells - grant 1972 - pretreatment of industrial waste.
Jd,UUU 466 PE/Yr. - .047 mgd or population projection 5663-1970 to 6550-1970 assume no individual growth
24,600 Qinc/Yr. . B0D5 inc. = 44 PE or 7.5 #/day Qinc - 4400 GPD
BOD stream = .75 j?/day
2. b
-------
I ¦/' ¦" !.'• ,i ;i Red
l1 n SUUKlL Grand Forks
;;ilc
V/TTi
1 Alii L 1
2.5/7
298 Red.
I.'.ir. te Pdi'oimeter
Present
Load
Flow, i'IGD
9.6
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0DS
1992 #/day
(25 mg/1 )
TDS
N/D
TSS
2340 #/day
(29 mg/1)
'J
N/D
Org- N
N/D
Total-M
N/D
Tocal-P
N/D
Feca1 Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic lietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TT
Pres. Reduc. iii>q1 d
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
FY 72 Connm ts
75
73 74
76
l-Y 73 , 74 Commits
74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
#/Day
37.5 37.5 3/.5 37.5
45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
73
Total Commits
"TTT +-T4T
74 75 76
(27
TTT
W
T57
(57
co'i;;o;TS:
Typa of Facility Waste stabilization lagoon system (600 acres) - the assump
SntpPEE. US - wb 75g0n'E/Yr' MGD/Yr-
rfn ^4. n * SOD stream = 37.50 #/day
Effluent Requirenents »/uajr
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - 1995 #/day *B0D in Stream (Cap) 20437'6~T/d. 2088f7d.
2. 30 mg/1 SS 2400 #/day BOD from plant 2028 #/d. 2087#/d.
Total Reduction
(2) + (51
1PV
73 74 75 76
Based on pop. incr.
and hydraulic incr.
BOD & SS eff. req.
will not be violate:
1.0
.5
i.o
W
DNA
2.5
is that proj. on 5-yr. needs list is extension of sewer system.
@ 25 mg/1, BOD to stream - 37.50
1 973 1 974 1975 1976
3.
Type Sewei-
Separate)
SS will follow the same pattern, just factor figures.
2133 j'/d.
2102 fi/d.
2175 •?/d.
2145 §/A.
-------
river pasin Red
W • j i: '..v i ER SOURCE Grand Forks Air Force Base
TABLE I
RIVER :ilEE 298 ReT
Pl'/ITI 2.5/7"
Total Connni ts
Total Reduction
rrr
W
PV
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. I'.cq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
I'Y 73 , 74 Commits
1 Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
—
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, I1GD
3.3
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
537 #/day
0
0
0
0*
1.0
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
630 #/day
0
0
0
0*
1.0
nh3-n
N/D
Ory-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease 8 Oil
N/A
1
UNA
Toxic lletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
/
TIT
I4T
COMi'iEIJTS:
Type of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoon system (total 80 acres).
Design P.E. 10500 Anticipate no future increase in population.
Present P.E. 10500
Effluent Requirements
1 25 mg/1 - BOD (684#/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS (825#/day)
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
(57
CODE 1
''Population increases assumed to be constant.
VT
2.5
-------
Ri
-------
!'["i i i:<. .Ill Red
T /VIM
i
ii.\ ,111 11 l( M'UKll. i_i sbon
I / \ M
1
;iiu.
441 - confluence
of R. R. of North &
Sheyenne R.
2.5/7
Total Commits
Total Reduction
PV
Present
Pres. Reduc. 1:¦ q1 d
FY 72 CommiLs
FY 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
1 '
'.-loste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Ou.i.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 75
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.18
PI i
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
eod5
99.0 #/day
0
0
0
negligible
0
0
1.0
(22 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
108 jr/day
0
0
0
negl i gi bl e
0
0
1 .0
(26 mg/1)
N/D
Org- N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease S Oil
N/A
Toxic i'etals
N/A
Ot her Toxics
N/A 1
or
I4T
T5T
w
COi'rX'.'TS:
Typo of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoori system (est. 22 acres) no data available).
p'lp^'1t.PpEr ~ fonn ] 1 ,938 if day - BOD to stream Qinc/day/yr - .21 MGD BOD inc./yr to stream = 1.938# but inc. in Q = .21 MGD
Effluent Requirements ,25 mg/1 B0D eff' std" is not violated (increase = 1 mg/1)
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (lll#/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (135#/day) CODE 1
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
2.5
-------
Ill
_Be3 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.51
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
105 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
(25 mg/1 )
TDS
N/D
TSS
123 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
(29 mg/1)
WH3-1J
N/D
Orcj-N
N/D
To t a 1 -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Tecal Coli.
N/D
Total Col) .
N/D
Grc-ise a Oil
N/A j
Toxic iietals
N/A
1
0ther Toxics
N/A
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
~UT
2.5
Type of Faci1lty
Desnm P.E.
Present P.E.
(2)
(57
W
- 1-acre aerated cell followed by a 20-acre cell and a 10-acre cell.
- 3500 - (1 990 popl proj. = 2200) Expected Increase ^0
- 1750
Effluent Requirenents
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (105#/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (127.5 #/day)
3.
Type Sewe- (£x«ity,xve$(KXXX Separate)
-------
RIVI.I? OAS III jted
LR SOURCE Pembina
Rivnr: IiiLC 158
PV'/Pii 2.5/7
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. !!;;q'd
to Meet EPA Cbj.
FY 72 Commits
IV 73, 74 Commits
Ejcpected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.18
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
E0D5
35.7 #/day
0
0
0
.25 .25 .25
0 0 0 0
(24 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
TSS
42 #/day
0
0
0
.25 .25 .25 .25
0 0 0 0
(28 mg/1)
nh3-n
N/D
Org-11
N/D
To ta 1 - N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease 6 Oil
N/A
Toxic lletals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
PV
J5T
J7T
1 .0
.5
1 .0
Ti)
COK'IE.'.'TS:
Ty.^c of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoon system (23 acres)
Design P.E. - 2300
Present P.E. - 700
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 25 mg/1 BOD - 37.5 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 450 if/day
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
\4)
CODE 1
Population increased 1.8% per year during 1960-1970 decade.
Assume expected increase ~ 0.
2.5
-------
11 .IN Red_
11 '.M :: U bUUUl.L Wahpeton
U'.ir, MILL 549 Red
*v / i';i
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, I1GD
3.0
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
GOD.-
2091 if/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
2510 #/day
nm3-n
N/D
Orrj-il
N/D
Total-M
N/D
Tota1 -P
N/D
Fecal Co 1i.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic lietals
N/A
Oilier Toxics
N/A
"07"
Pres. ReduL. I'"q'd
to Meet EPA iJijj.
1467 #/day
1760 =?/day
J2Y
1LI 1
FY 72 Commits
"7 b """"
73 74
76
1467 0
0 1760 0
FY 73, 74 Coninnts j Expected Jncr.
73 74 75 76 "I 73" 74 75
76
W
negligi ble
negl igible
Total Commits
(3) + (4T
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2) +i5r
73 74 75 76
0 1467 0
0 1760 0
W
w
1467 0 0
1760 0 0
W
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - aerated lagoon followed by waste stabilization lagoon system (70 acres).
Design P.E. - 16500
Present P.E. - 10400 (overloaded, Population - 7000 - present lagoon capacity)] .340 P.E./Yr. inc. = 17.4#/day to stream BOD Q/Yr.
Effluent Requirements BOD inc. = neg.
1. 25 mg/1 BOD - (624 #/day)
2. 30 mg/1 SS - (750 #/day) CODE 1
3.
Type Sewer (toxlxxaafltxaR Separate)
VT
.09
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
2.5
-------
RI Vi :i L'.ASIN Red
WASTFV.'ATER SOURCE Walhall;
TABLE I
RIVTR MILE 196 confluence with Pembina and Red River of North
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Rcq'd
to Meet EPA Obj .
FY 72 Commits
l:Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5) |
73 74 75 76
)3 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, "1GD
.39
PH :
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
BOD5
75.0 #/day
0
¦ 0
0
.25 .25 .25 .25
0
none needed
(23 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
TSS
88.5 #/day
0
0
0
.30 .30 .30 .30
0
none needed
(27 mg/1)
NH3-N
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Co 1i.
N/D
Total Co 1 i.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
J PV
.5
irr
TIT
COiil-iEiiTS:
Type of Facility - Two-cell waste stabilization lagoon (18.9 acres)
Design P.E. - 2460
Present P.E. - 1471
Effluent Requirenents
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - (81 #/day)
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - (97.5 #/day)
3.
Type Sewe- Separate)
(47
T5T
W
2.5
CODE 1
.3% population increase per year during 1960-1970.
-------
'/¦: Vy- 7
'¦ ¦' v i lSOUI'.CL West Farqo-Shevenne River
TABLE 1
ILL
I'v/p;i
Shevenrie 23.1
"T2T
Total Commits
Total Reduction
TIT
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Il-q'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
FY 73, 74 Commits
ExDected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, I1GD
3.42
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
302.1 #/day
0
0
0
negl igible
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
354.0 §1 day
0
0
negl igible
0
0
NH3-fi
N/D
Drg-rl
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Tola 1 Col i.
N/D
r
[
[
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Iletals
N/A
Other Toxi cs I
N/A
147
W
W
PV
1.0
.5
1.0
VT
DNA
IT
COM'iEilTS:
Tyno of Facility - Waste stabilization lagoons (168 acres).
Design P.E. - 24,609 (6,759 domestic + 17,850 industrial
Present P.E. _ ng2g
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 - BOD - 711 #/day.
2. 30 mg/1 - SS - 855 #/day.
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
2.5
] Increase in load due to population is offset by increase in
Q due to population.
-------
nr,,31N Red _
JER SOURCE Valley City (New project is for the con-
TABLE 1
R!V::< '• TLE 248.CPSheyenne
pv/r;: 2.577
struction of force M.
TTT
(2T
TIT
ste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. Iioq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
FY 72 Commits
| 1 Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
PV
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, f'GD
2.13
PH
N/D
Temp, <>F
N/D
bod5
399 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
(23 mg/1)
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
469.5 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
(27 mg/1)
»"3-«
N/D
Ortj-M
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fccal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Greasp 8 Oil
N/A
Toxic Hetals
N/A
Olliar Toxics
N/A
1
i
Total Commits
Total Reduction
T5T
wr
TTT
2.5
COiiiXHTS:
Type of Facility - 3 cell waste stabilization lagoon (117 acres)
Present^E ^7843 ^ 2^7 PE/Yr. BOD to system = 15.15 #/day/year Qin - .09 BOD to stream/y - 22 mg/1
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 25 mg/1 BOD - 444 #/day
2. 30 mg/1 SS - 532.5 #/day
3.
Type Sewer- Separate)
-------
i1.':: m. I :-i
Red
ASTiAi LP. SOURCE American Sugar. Moorhead. Minn
;vn: ;;/l: 438 Red
V/ I'll 7/2
TACi.t
s r.c Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. q'd
to Meet EPA 11 !\j.
FY 72 Coiiiiii i ts
75
73 74
76
1Y 73, 74 Commits 1 Expected Incr.
73
74
75
76 i 73 74 75 76
Total Commits
TTT + f4T
Total Reduction
73 74 75 76
T2T
T57
73 74 75 76
PV
Flow, flGD
10 MGD
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
118,000
TDS
N/D
TSS
12,500
nh3-n
N/D
Org-M
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coll .
N/D
Crease 8 Oil
N/A
Toxic lietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
m
COHiOTS:
Tyoe o f Fac11 ity
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenients
1 .
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
TIT
IsY
~W
TTT
(2f
Region V is responsible for Administering EPA programs in Minnesota.
-------
M'/::.-: cue
n;,Mil Red_
''\iLi! j'uuulL American Crystal, Crookston, Minn.
1AI!
53 Red Lake
i>\/
V/.'il
7/2
Wasto Parameter
Flow, ;iGD
PH
Temp, °F
B005
TDS
TSS
N H 3 - i 1
Or
-------
RIVER BASIN Red.
'.rSTZ'.IATER SOURCE American Crystal-E. Grand Forks, Minn.
RIVER MILE 293 ReH~~
PV/PN 7/2
TABLE ]
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Present
Pres. Reduc. Req'd
FY 72 Commits
l-'Y 73, 74 Corrmits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2J + (5)
PV
Waste Parameter
Load
to Meet EPA Obj.
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
4.5
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/0
boo5
75,000 §/day
3
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
2600 #/day
3
nh3-n
N/D
Org- r-.'
N/D
Total-N
N/D
I'5
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Ui 1
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
i
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
7.0
COnfiEIlTS :
Type of Faci 1 ity
Dcsign P.E.
Present P.E.
Region V is responsible for Administering EPA programs in Minnesota.
Effluent Requi rerients
1
2.
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)
-------
RIV [ r. Ij A S IN Re d
WASTEWATER SOURCE Ada, Minnesota
UIV[R MILE Marsh River-Red
P7/PN 2.577"
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Flow, MGD
.186
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
35#/day
TDS
11/D
TSS 41
41#/day
nh3- h
N/D
Org- i-i
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Tietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Present
Load
ITT
Pres. Reduc. iioq'd
to Meet EPA Obj.
127
FY 72 Commits
73 74~ 75 76
TY 73, 74 Commits
T3 74 75 76
"W
W
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
TTT
in
73 74 75 76
15T
ley
Total Reduction
HI
T5)
73 74 75 76
PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
DNA
~UT
2.5
COMMENTS:
Tyoe of Facility - Secondary TF
Design P.E. 4600 based on Boq increase = hydraulic increase - there fs no expected increase in loading to stream.
Present P.E. I860
Effluent Requirements
1- 3"9#/day BODc (25 mg/1)
2. 47#/day TSS (30 mg/1) LUUt 1
3.
Type Sewer (Comb ned or Separate)
-------
i'P'l I: .ii; Red
w v, i; \!i\ i [ !•; SOUKCL Bagley, Minnesota
;:]VL"H ;;n.E ClearwaTeT'^nrecT'CaRe
PV/f'il
TAU
ITT
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc.
to Meet EPA
Flow, riGD
.13
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
26 #/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
30 #/day
0
r f n 3 - rj
N/D
Org-N
N/D
T o t a 1 - N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease 8 Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
W
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
W
CO!'MEIITS:
Type of Facility - Secondary Trickling Filter
Design P.E. 1300
Present P.E. 1250
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 27#/day BOD
2. 32#/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (Combined or Separate)-Information not available
I V 73, 74 Commits
74
75 " 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
73
Total Commits
(3) + (4)
74 75 76
Total Reduction
75T~
izr
pv
73 74 75 76
1 .0
.5
1 .0
DNA
w
w
(6T
~ur
2.5
CODE 1
-------
KiYij: i;/\sin
Red
W.\ST 1.41ATCR SOUKCL Bainesvi 11 e . Minn.
RIVf.'< HUE Wi11ow-Deerhorn-Buffalo-Red
PV/PiJ
TABLE I
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. koq'd
to Meet EPA 0!j,i.
FY /2 Commits
i"Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.15
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0 1
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -M
N/D
—1
O
cj
i
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease S Oil
N/A
C
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
PV
.5
T5f
VT
DNA
COrWfjITS:
Type of Facility - Secondary Activated Sludge
Design P.E. - 1560
Present P.E. - 1480
Effluent Requirerients
1. 31 #/day BOD
2. 37#/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (Comlrned or Separate)
ITT
"ley
2.5
CODE 1
Information not available
-------
HAS 111
Red
W'M' ?<1 L"R 'SOURCE Breckenridge , Minn.
1;I vL!; HILE Red FTTver
n/i'H 2.sn
TABLE 1
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, MGD
.35
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
70 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
86 #/day
NH3-IJ
N/D
Org-N
N/D
To t a 1 -N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coll.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic i'.etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
7TT
TF
Pres. Reduc. i'eq'd
to Meet EPA Ouj.
FY 72 Cohjints
73 7475 76
jrr
W
COiiiiEilTS
Tyoe of Facil i ty -
Design P.E. 5000
Present P.E. 3800
Effluent Requirenents
1 . 73 #/day B0D5
2. 88264 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer ^£*m»b<*P0ckxxx Separate)
;Y 73, 74 Commits
'3 74 75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
(3) + (47
73 74 75 76
W
"75r
767
Total Reduction
UT
73 74
+ (5,
75
76
,PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
~ur
DMA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
f.'iV! I! BAMN Red
WAS : L'.'.M ER SOURCE Crookston, Minn.
RIVL.'I iiiLC Red Lake River-Red Rivpr 53
PV/PN 2.5/7
TABLE 1
Waste Parameter
Present.
Load
Flow, i'IGD
2.31
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/0
B0D5
450 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
525 if/day
NH3-II
N/D
Org-11
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Tota 1 - P
N/D
Feca 1 Col 1 .
N/D
Total Col 1 .
N/D
Grease & l)il
N/A
Toxic Iletals
N/A
Otlmr Toxics
N/A
"HT
Pres. Reduc. Hoq'd
to Meet EPA Ou.i ¦
jrr
FY 72 Commits
75'
73 74
76
w
COMnLflTS:
Type; of Facility - Secondary stabilization pond.
Design P.E. - 14,394
Present P.E. - 7,700
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 480 #/day BOD
2. 570 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
:Y 73 , 74 Conjiiiits
3 74 75 76"
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
Total Reduction
73 74 75 76
HI
73 74 75 76
DNA
W
T5T"
T6T
"TTT
2.5
CODE 1
-------
RIVLR BASIN Red
W".SICWATLR SC'JRCE E. Grand Forks, Mi nnesota
RIVER MILE Red RTver 29.3
i-'V/Pil 2.5/7
TABLE 1
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. R:q'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
FY 72 Commits
j (Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5 J
73 74 75 76
! 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, f'GD
2.25
!
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
20.5 mg/1
387 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
25 mg/1
465 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
C
nh3-?i
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxi c Metal s
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
|
PV
T2T
^y
1.0
.5
1 .0
(5)
ley
T7T
DNA
2.5
COnnEMTS:
Type of Facility - 2nd Stabilization Pond
Design P.E. - 14000 ] The effluent quality should remain the same assuming that the BOD increases at a rate
Present .t. /bUU 0-f 17f¥/c/d and the hydraulic flow increases at a constant rate (100 g/d/c)
Effluent Requirements is//
25 mg/1 - 468#/day
2- 30 mg/1 - 561#/day
3- CODE 1
Type Sewe- (fcostoorpedowx Separate)
-------
i'.ivn: r.''vs [n Red
i11 \ ',!\ i K SOUW.I Fosston, Minn,
u IVI K Mill" Poplar "River-Sand Hi 11-Red'River
TAB I L
Total Conwiits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. lieduL. K^q'd
to Meet EPA 0!>,i.
FY 72 Coiniiii Is
F IY 73. 71 Commits
| Ejected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2V + (5) -
73 74 7b 76
73 74 75 16
1 /3 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
8.19
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
858 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
1395 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total - P
N/D
Fecal Col l .
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease S Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
(T)
T2)
W
(4T
757
W
VT
1 .0
.5
1.0
DNA
COMMENTS:
Tyoe of Facility - 2nd Trickling Filter, waste stabil ization ponds.
Design P.E. - 27,000 Population increase to BOD and SS loading of stream will
Present P.E. - 12,443 -I be offset by increase in hydraulic loading.
Effluent Requirements
1. 25 mg/1 1710#/day
2. 30 mg/1 2070 #/day
3.
Type Sewer (Gom&onatfxow Separate)
2.5
CODE 1
-------
¦ I/
-------
III'/ER r.ASIi'l- Red
WAST\ VIAi lR SOUUCE Frazee, Minn.
TABLE I
P.!7lR MILE Otterton-Red
2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. iloq'd
to Meet EPA Obj .
FY 72 Commits
I y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
.'3 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, "GD
.3
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
60 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
69 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
NH3-N
N/D
Org-K
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coll.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
To.xic fieta 1 s
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
i
Total Commits
Total Reduction
P V
1.0
.5
1.0
1ST
w
COMMENTS:
Typo of Facility - 2nd Stabilization pond
Design P.E. 600
Present P.E. 500
Effluent Requirenents
1. 63 #/day BOD
2. 75 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (tora&rtwe&xa:* Separate)
W
i4J
2.5
CODE 1
-------
Ul.'Li' I'.A'oIii Jted
1,7. j i r-.' M ii R SOURCE Hallock, Minn.
RIVER MILE Middle Fork of Two Rivers-Red
PV/Pil 2.5/7
TABLE I
l-.'aste Parameter^
Present
Load
Flow, i'.GD
.15
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 §/day
nh3-n
N/D
Org - rJ
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fccal Coli .
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Iletsls
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TT
Pres. Reduc. kcq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 76
(2)
W
l'y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 76
14T
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
T5T
Total Commits
'(3) + (4)~
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
(2)
767
74 75 76
PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
DNA
TT
2.5
COilMCMTS:
Tyns of Facility - 2nd trickling filter
Design P.E. 2-900
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirerients
1 31 #/day BOD
2. 37 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (&«HbxR«dx8K Separate)
CODE 1
-------
RIVER CAS 1M Red
l-iAjTrJ.IATER SOURCE Mahnomen, Minn.
TABLE I
Try
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility - Sec. Stabilization pond.
Design P.E. 1500
Present P.E. 1 300
Effluent Requirerients
1 . 81 #/day BOD
2. 96 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (GomixxxaaixaR Separate)
RIVER MILE Wild
PV/PN 2.5/7
Rice River-Red
Total
111
Comnn ts
+ la\
Total Reduction
(2) + (5)
Present
Pres. Reduc. Roq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.i.
FY 72 Commits
73 74 75 7b
l-Y 73, 74 Commits
73 74 75 lb
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
l ¦*)
73 74
75 76
73 74 75 75
PV
Flow, flGD
.39
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
BOD 5
78 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
l .0
TDS
N/D
.5
TSS
90 #/day
0
0
0
0
0'
0
l .0
nh3-n
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease S Oil
N/A
DNA
Toxic Metals
Other Toxics
N/A
N/A
/ A
lc,\
<6»
(7)
9 £
CODE 1
-------
I¦ IV11' I /'.'. I!J Red
w > I ii'"-'! j(-HJiu:i._Hawj_ey.^Minnesota,
KI V!.!•: liiLL' Buffalo-Red
i ap.i r i
JTT
727
C0'i/iC!TS: .
Type of Facility - 2nd Stabilization Pond
Design P.E. 3000
Present P.E. 2500
Effluent Requirerients
1. 81 #/day BOD
2. 96 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer ft?Wi)foWM{j!rf)y!rX Separate)
T3T
Total Commits
Total Reduction
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. I,<:q'd
to Meet EPA 0;)j.
FY 72 Coimin ts
I'Y 73, 74 Commits
Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
Flow, MGD
.39
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
78 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
90 #/day
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nll3-H
N/D
Org -fJ
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coll.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic Metals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
i
PV
1 .0
.5
1 .0
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
_Red_
rivr.n basin
WASrp.J.-wCR "
RI.'lR MILE Red River
PV/P.'i 2.5/7
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, I1GD
2.7
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
816 #/day
bod5
N/D
TDS
960 #/day
TSS
N/D
nh3-n
N/D
Org-M
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total-P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic "etals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TABLE I
TIT
Pres. Reduc. Keq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j ¦
W
FY 72 Conmnts
73 74"
75 76
r'Y 73 , 74 Coninnts
73 74 75 76
T3T
"T4T
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
3DZZ35I
73 74 75 76
Total Reduction
T5]~
73
W
74
75 76
PV
T5T
fey
1 .0
.5
1.0
TTT
DNA
2.5
COI-'ii'LNTS:
Tyoe of Facility - Activated Sludge
Design P.E. 75,000
Present P.E. 46,000 (including ind. flow)
Effluent Requirements
1 . 1190 #/day BOD
2. 1420 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (£xwt«»«ckxstx Separate)
CODE 1
-------
; i:/".i;i Red__
i LHA1 l.l< SUUkCI. PeTTcan Rapids
I'ii'WIC Pelican River
PV/l'.'i 2.577
TAI!
Knsie Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, ,'1GD
.15
PH
N7D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
30#/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
35 #/day
Nll3-N
N/D
Or
-------
kivii: I--AS1H Red
1.'. .SI C'..'AIT ft SOURCE Roseau, Minn.
klVLR iilLE Roseau River-Red in Canada
PV/P.'i 2.5/7
TABLE I
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc. koq'd
to Meet EPA Ob.j.
FY 72 Coi'iiin ts
73 74"
75 76
F1ow, MGQ
.114
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
bod5
120 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
150 #/day
hh3-h
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total -N
N/D
Tota 1 -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & 0)1
N/A
Toxic iietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
TH UY
COiTTilTS:
Type of Facility - Primary Imhoff
Design P.E. 3500
Present P.E. 2300
Effluent Requirerients
1. 237 #/day BOD
2. 285 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer Ouoolxjoedoor Separate)
W
Total Commits Total Reduction
Y 73, 74 Com.ints
1 Expected Incr.
(3) + (4)
(2) + (5)
3 74 75 76
1 73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
8 8 8 8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T4] (5] [6] (71 2.5
CODE 1
-------
KIVI.K RerL
;:,-'.Kl!ATCR SOURCE _
P.iVr.ri nlLF. Clearwater R.-Red Lake-Red River
TABLE
.7 ii j
2.5/7
Wflste Parameter
Present
Load
Flow, I1GD
.42
PH
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
51 #/day
TDS
N/D
TSS
63 #/day
NH3-N
N/D
Org-N
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Co 1i.
N/D
Total Coli .
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic lietals
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
Pres. Reduc. ueq'd
to Meet EPA Ot)j.
~UT
COMMENTS:
Type of Facility WSP - secondary
Design P.E. 1700
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirenents
I . 87 if/day BOD
2. 105 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer Separate)
T2T
FY 72 Contiints
73 74 75 76
W
^Y_73, 74 Commits
'3
74
75 76
Expected Incr.
73 74 75 76
Total Commits
T3T^~(4r
73 74
75 76
W
T5T
W
Total Reduction
(2) + (5T~
73
74 75 76
PV
1.0
.5
1 .0
~UT
DNA
2.5
CODE 1
-------
I'iv! i I III Red
1'V i:'.;\iik SOUKU Thief River Falls
!:i 1Li-: Red Lake River-Red River
IAI!
> ¦ I i >< C.J//
Waste Parameter
Present
Load
Pres. Reduc.
to Meet EPA
Flow, I1GD
.65
Pll
N/D
Temp, °F
N/D
B0D5
130 #/day
0
TDS
N/D
TSS
152 #/day
0
N/D
Org-fl
N/D
Total-N
N/D
Total -P
N/D
Fecal Coli.
N/D
Total Coli.
N/D
Grease & Oil
N/A
Toxic iietal s
N/A
Other Toxics
N/A
HT
T2T
FY 72 Coi.'ini Is
75
7 3 74
76
w
2nd Trickling Filter
12800
10700
CO!''iEilTS:
Type of Facility
Design P.E.
Present P.E.
Effluent Requirements
1 135 #/day BOD
2. 162 #/day SS
3.
Type Sewer (£o*ifcMXD0ckx»fx Separate)
1
I V 73, 74 Coiiiiiiits
Expected Incr.
Total Conmii ts
ihzizhe:
Total Reduction
(2) + (b7
,'3 74 75 76
73 74 75
76
73 74 75 76
73 74 75 76
DNA
T4l [5l [61 (71 2.5
CODE 1
-------
I
•r? r Mcr-i—f-ft d ¦
0 ^ P~
kJtld f\ i c g A vx? r _A.
flmtci can
C f ys id I Sujdtr
'A1c$r head
I
Rkt-fcrcmbic (^)
Vv w TP ~~
v.
&
"~0
CV
1
t
u
"V
v.
+-
\J1
v\
O-H-Cr tail
Co.
f~a
Vi.
h
c
X
£
o
£
DQ
£ Cl
to t-
L
£i kcfJ^\
^{-ait Line i
L. e j en cl
\j> I; ^
O City
S'amplir^ 5-ha l~i'sns
Sfravtrs d fLaUd
l\Ich ' bioi- -be S~ca !e
-------
Czfcvnd
Fcr k
Minn kohl^Fci'y
&Y°dnd Fcrics
U> S. Qtr Fcrcxf
Base.
Goose K'/i/e.r
o1
* -
a.
*A
•v
—V-
£ ^
A fillsbary
£¦¦ (or&nd
h^rjes UiWTp
f} mifi'ccm
Crysta.1 S~ajar
CL
h-
3
V.
¦v
VO
ii
t
V)
>3
"V.
£
K
<1
H?
_^/
0
•w
U.
Red ke Ri^/tr
si
>
x s
«u
t
\J
0.
£
V-
r
>
-c
•
£o iT
i
H r-
2 *
I—
$
•G
>s.
V
^ a-
K ^
^ 5
£ 5
£
>
^L " o
*o
r ' ¦
V^'.V)
1/5
-v- - ^
'/! -.*»
** "" u
0£
~u
u
(V
a.
K-
*
£
>-
*0
¦^r
i_
Oc
?£
H.
B?
V)
I
-K
V)
Btrmsv, 11(3
wwrp
Buff* (o River
I 1
Z^L
-+- b
VO ^
l-ecjind
Farji
^ R^AHI
A m Mb, W
A Samp /in cj
O C f'{- y
0
lA
VC
\j
<5
--i.
c*:
No 11 : No f -/-a sea U
-------
aT
ft.
I-
-XT
J
Pf.mojncK wvvTP
UH' /d cl Si a /c" 5
Fembi-n& (^)A
Pembina TcVi/vr
Cava
IV vv T P
ver Mj/c 'S"S
>
tv
N
\J
5;
t ^
N
Dr^y -fm vV vV TV
f\ mer/can ^
'/-•- 1 ^ —
a
£
£
JL
Pari c Riser
River
Mile &&
220
X ejdnd
A Sampling S-fa 4-! on
O C/f
X
I wo "Risers
>
k
c:
<5
\>
V
Ri'A 3o£>
\.
ik
r>>
a.
_\/
V
0
V}
I
n*
^r:
Oslo vjwtp
M? hi A/of
S"C<2
-------
•r7 r
pAfy 0 ^ >-v ~i~>
UVcj ficc /jlL-.'r A
^ American
Crysi
&
CV
1
k
c
•a
-K
<-0
Wo-hp^fiJii
w W TP ~N
Wahpeftn^^j
Orttr Tail Paw
Co.
¦y
A
"•v.
t_
r~
K
V.
"U
y
£
o
£
to
v-i
£ a.
t
i/l I"
b z
ll
\
"s^q-
Or h
5 t
£
Fair pica r\ t
WWTR ~
klcrih Dakch
Sbs.tt \inC ^
->
s+aii Line
A
Offer I&i I Ri'/zr
^iser Mi U 5^9
-Befs de S/cikctJ^\jy^ .
r^ kme
L. e. cj £n c/
A Samp ISftxl-icrts
SfrUVt^rSd. (~a !<
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
POLLUTION SOURCES WITH PV > 3
American Crystal Sugar {Drayton)
Armour Food - Fargo
American Crystal Sugar, C^ookston
American Crystal Sugar, Moorhead
American Crystal Sug-, E. Grand Forks
Fargo WWTP - Fargo
Union Stockyards - West Fargo
Fargo Water Filtration Plant (Fargo)
Minnkota Power Corp. (Grand Forks)
Otter Tail Power Co. (Wahpeton)
Pillsb'jry Corp - Grand Forks
PV
9.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
^ n
-------
SECTION E
Ambient W.Q. Status
-------
CGITV 3Af CCOJ.lPliSHMEfiTS: AMl'Jhi WQ ACCOMPLISHMENTS REP02T
•o;j vrn
CALENDAR YEAR 19 72 _
DATE wramn Sep. 1972
-PACED Terrv L- Anderson
(EiameJ
'uOVED KY:
AREA
TOTALS
l r^niry casins
K! r.EC!::i
^nj_R(?d River
ma mtGiii~oTrry*
She V('i": f | o u r fj rV
Snt Lake Tributery
Park Tributa r v
POPULATION
ND 247,000
Minn.261,000
Tot. 508,000
General Engineer
(Titl-i)
TEL.
[Title]
(Inlticls)
RIVER KICSOP. AHEA
e.iuivjueut fch lmes,
ESlUAftES. ETC.
WITS STArc:).rvKDS j::3T AT STACIDAJIOSj CAS!:i TOTALS (KlliS ANO/OR ahea^
P. MTl ynn J Inrft re r>ir»
-------
TABLE II - AMBIENT WATER QUALITY AT II'AIiEST DOWNSTREAM MONITORING' STATION Page 1 Of 3
Red River of the North Basin
Data from STORET
BA; IC PARAKirriiRS - MC/L UiiKKK Al'PLICAliLS
FLOW
PH
,TEM?
XX)fX°C
DO
TDS
K .3
. .
NH3-NO3
ME
TOTAL
P
Ml VALUE 0
(FECAL)
(TOTAL)
RACT.
o
GREASE
& OIL
TOXIC
METALS
BOD
5-Day
sri^s.
EA32
FLO\'
.v.r^t eo'j^c.'js a:cd r.m.
Bois De Sioux Hivor 68-72
RM $56
Wahpeton 380012 (ND)
6.8
8.0
8.7
0.0
9.6
29.0
5.2
9.9
13.5
200
452
1055
-
-
-
44 MFM-FCI
3382 MFIME
R -
NDO
1.5
3.9
10.6
Red River SCl"(69-72
05051510
Wahpeton (EPA-USG5.)
15
442
2000
6.0
8.1
8.9
0.0
9.5
27.0
5.5
9.8
15.2
232
311
448
0 0
.2 .2
.9 1.3
¦ .1
.2
.4
250 MFM-FC
3560 MFIMIj
BR
NDO
Ar seni c
0
2.3
7.0
.8
2.7
5.7
1
i
1
Red River RM 446(68-7?)
380002
Fargo (NO)
7.0
7.8
8.5
0.0
9.9
26.0
$P
13.5
284
414
553
3265 MFM-f
(9096C)>!FIf
CBR
EN DO
1.3
7.0
16.0
Red River 7?A7 4^/(69-7?)
05054020
Below hargp' (EPA-USGS)
IS
606
. 4120.
7.1
0.0
9.8
27.0
12.4
282
384
743
0 0
1.3 .5
11.8 2.7
.3
1.5
13.0
2400 MFM-I
^27080)MFII
CBR
ENDO
Arsgni c
3.5
8.0
3.1
8.4'
34.0
Red River ,£)1Z74 (69-70)
RRRR 274
Oslo, Minn. (Minn.)
7.6
8.0
8.3
0.0
2.4
13.0
8.7
10.4
12.8
2.0
33.13
440
,0_ 0
.2 .2
.b .8
.3
.4
.7
4230 MPNEf
(f5iao}MPN
MED
COMP
.9
2.9
15
Red River RW-&{bl-7?)
05082500'
Grand Forks (USGS)
742
4780
47500
7.2
7.7
8.3
0
8.2.
26.0
*
208
330
471
0
.3
2.0
.03
'.03
.03
Arsgnic
3.9
13.0
1
Red River 68-72)
3c0003
Grand Forks (ND)
7.2
7.9
8.8
0
9.1
24.0
14.1
320
533
1240
.2
.5
1.0
41 MFM-FCE
3970 MFIME
R
NDO
1.1
3.4
17.0
Red River /?AJ &>3 (69-70)
260505
Perley, Minn. (Minn.)
7.1'.
7.9
8.6-
0.0
2.5
13.0
<£P
1?.2
2.0
' 18.2
148
0 0
.7 .5 "
l.R 1.1
.4
.7
1 1
11100 MPNf
t4740J)>MPN
CMED
COMP
1.4
7.5
54
-------
TABLE II - AMBIEKT WATER QUALITY AT HiMlEST DOV/NSTKEAK MONITORING' STATION
Red River of the..North Basin
PAGE 2 of 3
BAilC PAR/u'^TERS - KG/L UHEKE APPLICABLE
FLOW.
PH
.TEMP
' °C
DO
TD5
TS 3
NJI3-NO3
ME
TOTAL
P
\H VALUE Of
(FECAL)
(TOTAL)
TACT,
fLY
GREASE
& OIL
TOXIC
METALS
BOD 1 ST~l'
5-Day
| FLO",;
Red River (63-72)
380004
Drayton, N.D. (ND)
7.0
7.8
8.7
0
9.2
25.0
320
455
800
.1
.3
.5
190 MFM-FC
(fi30n)MFIMF
BR
Nnn
0.3
2.6
^ 1
Red River (68-72)
380005
Pembina, N.D. (ND)
6.5
7.8
8.7
0
9.0
24.5
6.1
9.6
14.3
285
485
1040
.1
.3
.9
122 MFM-FC
1430 MFIMt
BR
NDO
0.4
2.9
10.0
Wild Rice RiJ^' US (67-72)
05053000
Abercrombie (USGS)
.05
111
9260
7.1
7.9
8.6
0
10.8
25.0
110
1080
2840
0
.2
1.9
Phos-D
. 1
Wild Rice River 7 (68-72)
38,0006
Cayuga, N.D. (ND)
7.4
7.9
8.3
0.0
7.4
24.0
6.2
9.9
11.9
560
962
1880
.6
.6
.6
10 MFM-FCI
343 MFIMEf
R
DO
3.4
5.7
10.3
Otter Tail, (64-69)
RR0T-1
1 Mile from Mouth (Minn)
7.2
7.8
8.6
.5
15.5
26.7
6.1
8.7
13.6
290
333
380
12
73
230
0 U
.1 .2
.4 1.0
.1
.2
.4
1730 MPNEC
2470.-MPN C
MED .5
.5
ONF .5
Arseni c
5.0
1.5
3.2
4.8
Sheyenne Ri ver'4"'-^(69-72)
05060600
Near Harwood, N.D. (USGS)
30
420
3200
7.1
8.0
8.6
0
9.6
24.5
<$>
r- 13.6
260
600
965
0
.5
. 1.3
.1
' .4
1.0
Arsenic
0.0
7.4
20
.5
3.8
25.0
Sheyenne ^i!°Q (68-72)
38ffo07
Lisbon, N.D. (ND)
6.9
7.9
8.8
0
9.5
24.0
5.0
10.1
15.4
310
630
1840
.2
.4
1.4
400. MFM-FC
4000 MFIME
BR
NDO
1.4
4.1
16.0
Sheyenne f\/» iC((67-72)
05058700
Lisbon, N.D. (USGS)
16
290
4270
7.3
7.8
8.4
0.0
8.4
?8.n
293
555
-
0
1 .4
K 7
Fhos-L)
0
.1
1
0
26
-------
TABLE II
- AMBIENT WATER QUALITY AT HAREST DOWNSTREAM KONITORIKG" STATION
Red River of the North Basin
PAGE 3 of 3
BAcIC PARA^'flRS - KG/L U'hL'i'.i2 APPLICABLE
FLOW
PH
,^-lP
DO
TDS
TS.3
NH3-HO3
M
TOTAL
P
:an val.onl
(FECAL)
(total)
PACT.
y
CREASE
&. OIL
TOXIC
KETALS
.._nisZJ_...
BOD
5-Day
. .
STP3..
B.\3E
flow
' v:.T( cc/j-c.vi; ;:.7, p.m.
Sheyenne l\M/O - (69-70)
370013
North of West FaroofND)
7.0
8.0
8.4
0
2.7
12
13.9
2.0
24.0
184
0 0
.4 .3
2.2 1.3
.2
.4
1.6
1550 MPNEC
3250 MAN C
'1ED
3MP
»3/JL
.4
3.9
14.0
Goose River (69-70)
05066500
Hillsboro, N.D. (USGS)
2
40
273
7.5
7.8
8.4
0
8.5
24.0
820
1160
1520
Goose River (71-72)
380027
Hi llsboro, N.D. (ND)
7.3
7.8
8.3
0
10.4
22.0
5.2
9.6
13.1
430
704
1040
.2
.5
1.1
377 MFM-FC
6670MFIMEN
BR
DO
1.7
2.5
4.4
Pembina River k/l1/IG{68-72)
380011
Walhalla, rf.D. (ND)
7.0
7.9
8.7
0
8.5
25.0
11372
14.3
280
576
800
\ 1
.4
.8
27 MFM-FCE
1240 MFIME
R
ND0
.6
2.6-
6.1
.
Pembina Ri ver /iV)J>7<9(67-72)
05099600
Walhalla, N.D. (USGS)
10
615
6680
6.9
7.8
8.5
0
6.6
25
245
529
1200
I'iOi
0
.7
7.7
Hdog-U
.4
3.9
Arseni c
0.0
4.0
10.0
Red Lake Ri ver'•>>/l^{64-65)
RRRL-56CBB14A55
56 Miles from Mouth (Minn)
7.1
7.7
8.9
.5
14.6
24.. 4
6.4
8.1
; 10.8
14
167
920
.0^
.1
,3
.1
' .5
2.5
402 MPNECf
1492 MPN C
ED
0NF
2.0
*+.3
6.8
-------
SECTION F
Tactical Solutions
-------
TABLE XIX - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
PAGE
RED RIVER BASIN - SUMMARY
DATES
INITIATION
COMPLETION
NOV 72
NOV 72
OCT 72
DEC 72
JAN 73
FEB 73
MAR 73
JAN 74
OCT 72
MAY 73
MAY 73
JUN 73
MAY 73
JUN 73
JAN 73
FEB 74
11 II
II II
FEB 73
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MPS)
About .half of the Red River Basin falls
within Minnesota which is under the
jurisdiction of EPA Region V. Three of
the largest dischargers in the basin are
located in Minnesota. They are American
Crystal Sugar at Crooks ton, E. Grand
Forks and Moorhead. There are about
20 municipalities with populations larger
than 1000 which discharge their treated
municipal wastes to the Red River Basin.
Some of these receiving waters are
primary recreation areas.
To date, our contacts with Region V and
t.ie Minnesota State Department of Health
have not yielded the information we need
to adequately assess the water quality
problems for the entire basin and to
develop an accomplishment plan strategy
that v/.ill manage the water quality of the
sntire basin.
Mthough Region VIII does not propose to
Jevelop work loads for Region V, the
general needs in the Minnesota portion of
:he Basin have been included herein in
jrder to .provide a complete picture of the
jroblem.-
(1) Meet with the Regional Administrator for
Region V and come to an agreement which
will inculcate a working relationship be- .
tween the two regions for all programs in
the Red River Basin, (Management Division-
R.A.'s Office)
(2) Inventory all point sources of water pol-
lution in the Minnesota portion of the
Red River Basin.
(3) Analyze the water quality impact of each
source and assign an allowable waste load
to each.
(4) Obtain commitment letters from industry
which bind the industry to a specified
loading limitation to be accomplished
through an implementation schedule.
(5) Assess the discharge practices of wastewater
treatment plants in Minnesota and recommend
alternative methods which would improve
water quality throughout the discharge period.
(6) Review'Minnesota water quality standards to
determine their adequacy in light of pending
legislation and compatibility with North
Dakota's standards.
(7) Influence North Dakota to conduct meaningful
O&M studies and sampling program for waste-
water treatment plants in the basin. (A&W DIV
Program Support and Program Planning Branches)
(S&A Div.-Surveillance and Tech. Support Br.)
5T1214
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
Reg. V
2B1143
2B8163
2B8162
•2B2147
1.0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
PAGE 2
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK £< ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
INITIATION COM? LET 101'
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
;ia>:poker required
(PROF - MiN - y.OS)
FY 73 j FY 74-' FY 75 [ FY 7 6
During winter months, the majority of the
Red River of the North is covered with
ice. As a result, the DO and coliform
concentrations in the river do not meet
state standards. To improve this con-
dition, several industrial and municipal
wastewater treatment plants have been or
are beinq expanded and upgraded. However,
some of these projects are behind schedule.
The Denver Field Investigations Center (DFIC)
is committed to a water quality survey cover-
ing previously sampled stations on the Red
River during 1965 and 1969-1970. Throuqh a
comparison of results from earlier studies,
this study should determine whether the
expected imrovement in water quality has
occurred as a result of the upgrading of
wastewater treatment facilities at Fargo, N.D.
Moorhead, Minnesota, and Abercrombie, N.D.
The DFIC survey will take place prior to the
completion of all new construction and ,
therefore, an additional water quality survey
will be required to document comDliance with
standards.
(8) Establish a joint monitoring system of in-
strean water quality effluent discharges.
(Enforcement Div.-permits and Enforcement
Branches)
(1) Encourage state and municipalities to expedite
plant construction. (A&W Division - Planning
Branch and Municipal Wastewater Branch)
(2) Coordinate with DFIC on this survey so that
appropriate action may be taken if expected
improvements do not materialize. Any necessar)
.follow-up may include 1&M surveys, operator
training or upgrading of facilities. (S&A
Division - Technical Support Branch)
(3) Perform water quality survey and make compara-
tive analysis with the 1965, 1969-1970, and
1972-1973 studies. (S&A Division-Technical
SuDport Branch)
(4) Initiate a comprehensive stream and effluent
survey to determine a nutrient balance in
the Red River of the North. Suqgest recom-
mendations for a control program as required
by an analysis of survey results. Control
programs recommended may include aqricultural
runoff control or nutrient removal by Doint
sources. (Technical Support Branch-S&A
Division)
OCT 73
JUL 72
DEC 72
JUN 76
JUN 73
OUN 73
3B2124
2B2147
2B3149
2B8162
2B5154
DEC 73
SEP 73
JUN 74
2B5154
JUN 74 2B5154 0 110
.05
.05
0.5
5.0
2.5
.2
1.0
1.0
0 0
0 i 0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
PAGE 3
SITUATION ANALYSIS
A recommendation of the 1965 Conference con
cerning pollution of the Red River of the Nortf
was that nutrient concentrations in the river
should be determined and sources located to
prevent excessive algae growth and subsequent
water quality degradation. Nutrients are
thought to enter the river from point sources
(industry and municipalities) as well as non-
point sources (agriculture).
Also, the Red River Basin is characteristic in
that low flows are common and waste discharges
generally occur during spring and fall. North
Dakota water quality standards do not apply fo
DO during the processing season for agriculture
products if flows fall below the lowest 10% of
all monthly flows of record for either the
months of April or May. This DO Standard is
not identical to Minnesota but each applies to
the main stem of the Red River.
A significant amount of water quality data is
continuously being gathered at Federal, State,
and other sampling stations in the Red River
Basin. Additionally, situations occasionally
arise when further data and/or onsite insoec-
tio.i is required for verification of discharges
All available data is not readily available for
use in analyzing water quality needs or imorov!
ments.
Several treatment facilities are being designee
to hold treated wastes during the winter and
discharge them during the following spring.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(5) Review N.D. water quality criteria and use
classifications to determine their adequacy
and resolve differences between N.D. and
Minnesota.
(6) Obtain data from the collecting agency, code
and insert into STORET system, and review
program. Also, make on-site inspections to
verify discharges. (S&A-Surveillance Branch)
(7) Analyze the water quality of the Basin
using a simolified math model. The model will
•reflect water quality throuahout the basin
based upon low flow, waste loadinn, instream
1 water quality standards, and existing in-stream
water quality. (A&W Div.-Proaram Planning
Branch). Update in FY 74.
(8) Utilize DFIC's proposed survey and SXA's
survey to see what improvements are being
made in the water quality as wastewater control
facilities are put into operation and to
determine the effects of soring discharqe on
water quality. (A&W Division-Program Plannina-
P1anninq-Program Support Branches)
(9) Reconvene the Enforcement Conference and
publish report.
(10)Follow-up on the recommendations coming forth
from the Enforcement Conference.
(11) Follow-up on the compliance schedule of Fargo's
180-day notice.
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
May 73
SEP 72
SEP 72
SEP 73
FEB 73
SEP 74
SEP 74
SEP 72
SEP 72
Jun 73
JUN 76
OCT 73
OCT 73
SEP 74
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 73
JUN 73
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
>ia:;?c'."ir req;
(PROF - MAN -
IRED
:;os)
FY 73
2B1143 See Page I, Su
2B2146
2B2148
2B3149
2R8162
2B3149
2B4153
3B1123
3B1124
3B1123
3B1124
3B1123
i2B8102
FY 74- FY 75 ! FY
1.0
5.0
2.0
0
0
.30
.15
jtask
1.5
1.0
.25
.40
.25
3.0
1.0
2.5
1.6
.2
.1
6.
1.5
1.0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESGlKCE REOU^c.'^'.'TS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
PAGE 4
SITUATION analysis
RECOKIENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION" RESPONSIBILITY
D.^TES
initiation ccicpeeeicn ' e
le: :ent
fPRCr
FY 73
¦V 74
Fargo is under a 180-day notice to con-
struct a holding lagoon to provide winter
storage of their effluent. An investi-
gation of the Drayton WWTP will be con-
ducted to determine whether an enforce-
ment action is needed.
(12) Determine the necessity of an enforcement
action against Drayton and/or other munici-
pal iti es/i ndustri es.
I i ; | ! |
! SEP 72 ' JUM 76 I3B1123 ! 1 .5 [1.4 |1.4 l 1.4
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 5
RED RIVER BASIN - SUMMARY Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Fully developed water quality management
plans are being developed for the Red
River Basin and Fargo-I-'oorhead SMSA by
Dakota and Minnesota. Little
Coordination has been established between
the two states, Region V and Region VIII.'
Existing legislation calls for the approval
of fully developed water quality manage-
ment plans by July 1, 1S73. Mew legis-
lation extends this date to July 1974 and
requires that areavide planning agencies
be designated to conduct water quality
planning. North Dakota does not have
the planning capability to fulfill the
desired role set forth in the new legis-
• 1 ation.
RECOMMENDED ACT]ONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Establish inter-region inter-state and
inter-communi ty cooperation and coordination
for developing an integrated water quality
management plan for the Red River Basin to
be conducted on a continuing basis. (A&W
Division-Program Planning Branch)
(2) Monitor the progress of the water quality
management plans to assure adequate coverage
and detail which will satisfy the require-
ments of 40CFR35. (A&W Division-Program
Planning Branch)
(3) • Provide assistance to North Dakota and
Minnesota as it is needed to fulfill the
basin planning requirements.
(A&W Division-Program Planning Branch)
(4) Review of the Basin Plan for the Red River
of the North and the Metropolitan Plan for
Fargo-Moorhead on an intra-aqrency basis.
Assure consistency with Minnesota portions.
(5) Approve the water quality management plans
for the Red River Basin and the Fargo-Moorhead
SMSA.
(6) Assess impact of new legislation upon Water
Quality Management planning and Facilities
Management Grant Program.
(7) Work with Region V, HUD, States, and Fargo-
Moorhead ST ISA to plan the best strategy for
creating districts that could do water
quality management planning under the new
leoislation. (A&W Div.-Program Planning Br.)
DATES
PROGRAM
MANPOWER REQUIRED
INITIATION
COMPLETION
ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
HOS)
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76 '
NOV 72
JUN 76
VB3149
Reg. V
.5
.6 ¦
.3
.1- —
SEP 72
JUN 76
'2B3149
Reg. V
.4
.8
-3 „
.3
SEP 72
JUN 76
-2B3149
Reg. V
.5
.6 ..
1
_.4
.3
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73 ¦
APR 73
APR 73
APR 73
JUL 73 ~
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 73
JUN 73 -
JUN 73
'•2B3149
-2B6117
j3B1123
3B2124
'•2B5154
Reg. V
.9
.3
.3
.4
.3
.4
JUL 73
JUL 73
2B3149
.1
.2
SEP. 73
MAY 73
)2B3149
.5
•5
JUN 73
SEP 73
2B3149
.50
.7
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Paqe 6
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
.iiiiMi-mni L.IIMI. 1 num.
RECO>2£ENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK 4 ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
. (PROF - MAN - flOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
American Crystal Sugar - Drayton, N.D.
Past discharges of flume water have created
excessive organic and solids loading. At
the last formal meeting with EPA on June 29,
1972, ACS agreed to operate a closed
flume system for the 72-73 campaign in order
• to reduce the BCD5 leading. RAPP guidelines
limit BCD5 to 0.5 lb/ton of sliced beet.
.'.CS believes that this is an unrealistic
Mcure because spray irrigation would have
to be used exclusively to meet the require-
ments. Therefore, they feel 1.0 lb/ton
i-ep^esents the best practicable treatment.
The plant uses total containment during
winter months and utilizes the "spring flush"
technique to drain their lagoons. Mo dis-
charge under ice cover is permitted under
£PA guidelines.
(1) Continue to meet with company to settle
disagreement on BODg loading limitation.
(2) Obtain additional commitment letter.*
(3) Monitor stream and effluent to detect
pollution levels.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
SEP 72
MAR 73
SEP 73
MAR 73
JUN 73
MAR 75 ¦
3B2124
3B2124
3B2123
3B2123
.9
.30
.30
.2
0.05
\merican Crystal Sugar, Moorhead, Minn.
ACS at noorhead is a major contributor of
5OD5 and TSS to the Red River. However,
Region V is responsible for working with
~his company to establish an effluent re-
¦."'.uirerent that will be compatible with
,n-stream water qjjality criteria. To date,
.uch a limitation has not been established.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota,
and industry to agree upon effluent
limitations (should be uniiorm with other
Sugar Beet Mi 11s).
(2) Obtain a commitment letter from the industry
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and in-stream
water quality to determine impact of and
compliance with commitments.
APR 73
MAY 73
JUL 74
MAY 73
JUL 74
JUN 75
'3B2124
Reg. ,V
3B2123
3B2124
Reg. V
3B2123
Reg. V
1.0
.10
.10
.2
*These commitment actions will be converted immed-
iately into permit actions under the.new legis-
lation as soon as guidelines are available.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY, Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
. (PROF JUN - :ios)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 7
American Crystal Sugar, E. Grand Forks, Minn.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota, and
APR 73
MAY 73
3B2124
1.0
industry to agree upon elfluent limitations
Reg. V
ACS at E. Grand Forks is a major contributor
(should be uniform with other Sugar Beet
of BOD5. and TSS to the Red River. However,
Mills).
Region V is responsible for working with this
company to establish an effluent requirement
(2) Obtain a commitment letter from the
MAY 73
JUL 74
3B2123
.10
that will be compatible with in-stream water
i ndustry.*
3B2124
.10
quality'criteria. To date, such a limitation
Reg. V
has not been established.
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and instream
JUL 74
JUN 75
3B2123
.2
water quality to determine impact of and
Reg. V
compliance with commitments.
American Crystal Suqar, Crookston , Minn.
(1) Meet with Region V, State of Minnesota,
APR 73
MAY 73
3B2124
1,"U
1.0
ACS at Crookston is a major contributor of
and industry to agree upon effluent limi-
Reg. V
tations (should be uniform with other
BQD5 and TSS to the Red Lake River, a large
Sugar Beet Mills).
tributary of the Red River. However,
Region V is responsible for working with
(2) Obtain a commitment letter from the industry*
MAY 73
JUL 74
3B2123
.10
this company to establish an effluent re-
3B2124
.1
quirement that will be compatible with
Reg. V
instream water qual 1 ty criteria. To date,
(3) Monitor jointly the effluent and instream
JUL 74
JUN 75
3B2123
.2
such a limitation has not been established.
water quality to determine impact of and
Reg. V
compliance with commitments.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Pan? 8
SITUATION ANALYSIS
Arrcur Food-West Fargo , N.D.
A dye test study by EPA on March 29, 1972 ,
established that some of the v/aste discharges
from the Drocessing operation reach the
Sheyenr.e River instead of being routed to
the Fargo Industrial Park sewage treatment
facility. Arino'jr has discovered a cross
connection in the sever lines and a col-
lapsed sewer line on the stream bed to be
responsible for the discharge. The company
will either install a septic tank with an
underground disposal field or make a new
connection to the industrial park facility.
EPA is encouraging the latter alternative.
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY- Continued
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
(1) Negotiate with company and encourage a
sanitary sewer hook-up.
(2) Obtain commitment letter and follow-up with
inspection.*
(3) Monitor stream and effluent to detect pol-
lution levels.
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
OCT 72
MAR 73
JUN 73
FEB 73
JUN 73
.AUG 73
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
13B2124
'3B2123
3B2124
38212 3
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 7
.90
.20
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(prof - max - ::os)
Faroo, N.D. - Wastewater Treatment Plant
Located on Red River of the North. Project
consists of improvements to the wastewater
treatnenc facilities. Present population
aoproximates 53,000 and a future population
of 85,000 is projected for 1992. Currently,
the city wastewater is treated by a trickling
filter plant v:hich provides approximately
63% reduction of BOD and SS. A six-cell,
520-acre waste stabilization lagoon system
is presently under construction to provide
further reductiofi, or tertiary treatment
of municipal wastes discharged into the
Red River of the North. Nutrient removal is
net required at this time.
(1) Finalize construction, Inspection, put
plant into operation. (Air & Water Div.
Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) O&M Inspection.
(3) Monitoring of in-stream water quality impact
(if needed). Surveillance & Analysis)
(4) If it is determined that nutrient removal is
required based on the water quality surveys
and analyses by S&A & DFIC, influence State
and municipality to modify existing facil ities*j*
to provide for removal through construction
grants aid. (S&A MWW Planning)
SEP 72
APR 74
APR 74
APR 74
JUL 74
Jul 74
SEP 73
APR 74
MAY 74
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
2B8162
2B8163
2B7160
2B2148
3B1123
2B8162
2B3149
1.0
.30
.05
.25
.2
.2
.2
.2
**Permits for municipal facilities will be used to m£et
these needs as required.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 9
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
DATES
... .
PROGRAM
MAN?OWE
R REQUIRED
SITUATION ANALYSIS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
INITIATION
COMPLETION
ELEMENT
.(PROF -
M\N -
::os)
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Union Stockyards - Fargo
(1) Continue with negotiations and determine
AUG 72
JAN 73
3B2124
.4
effluent requirements. Encourage the
The stockyards have liquid waste treatment
company to use better water conservation
facilities constructed under a Federal re-
practi ces.
search, development and demonstration grant
and placed into operation in April 1971.
(2) Obtain letter of commitment.*
JAN 73
MAR 73
3B2123 •
.30
Normal operation routes all wastes to the
3B2124
.60
two-cell lagoon. But, during the winter
(3) Monitor Stream and effluent to detect
JAN 74
JAN 75
3B2123
.25
months, there is no significant pen drainage
pollution levels.
or,track washing. Watering trough overflow
combines with the domestic effluet from
(Enforcement Div.--Enforcement and Permits
the seotic tank and is byoassed to the
Branches)
river, eliminating the use of a lift station.
The organic loadinq is low (20 mg/1) and
would presumably not benefit from treatment
in the lagoon system. An acceptable treatment
of wastes during winter months is being
investigated. Complete winter retention
1
might be achieved by decreasing water
|
trough overflow.
i
Fargo, N.D. - Water Treatment Plant
(I) Award contract, finalize construction,
SEP 72
OCT 73
?B8162
.1
„
inspection, put plant into operation.
Project consists of improvements to the
(Air & Water Div. - Minicipal Waste Water
i
sludge handling facilities of the water
Branch}
1
treatment plant. Currently, 40,000 lbs/day
'
of suspended solids (lime sludge) is being
(2) 0&M Inspection (Air and Water Di v.-Munici pal
APR 74
APR 74
2B8163
.30
j
deposited in the Red River. Project is
Waste Water Branch)
APR 74
APR 74
2B7160
.05
!
currently out for bids and when construction
1
is complete 40,000 lbs/day of inert dried
(3) Monitoring (if needed by S/A)
SEP 74
OCT 74
2B2148
.30
lime sludge will be deposited in the Fargo
I
Sanitary Landfi11.
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 10
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
DATES
PROGRAM
MAN" P OWE
R REQUIRED
SITUATION ANALYSIS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
INITIATION
COMPLETION"
ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
-10 S )
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 7 5
FY i 6
Minnekota Power Coop., Inc. - Grand Forks
(1) Continue meetings with company to develop
JUN 72
MAR 73
3B2124
1.0
satisfactory effluent requirements-RAPP
Lignite or oil is burned to produce steam
Program.
for this 21 ,500 kw electrical generation
plant. The plant normally on cold stand-by
(2) Obtain commitment letter.*
MAR 73
MAY 73
3B2123
.4
operational basis and has not been used con-
3B2124
.4
tinuously for more than five days in the past
eight years. Expected operation is 700 hrs.
(3) Monitor effluent and stream after remedial
JUN 73
JUN 76
3B2123
.4
.05
.03
per year. However, during operation, the
measures are complete.
1
discharge is high in total solids concen-
tration. Permits has obtained a letter of
(Enforcement Div.—Enforcement and Permits
commitment from the company concerning
Branches)
another plant outside this basin. Effort
will now be shifted to this Grand Forks
pi ant.
Otter Tail Power Company - Wahepton
(1) Develoo effluent criteria through RAPP.
DEC 72
JUN 73
3B2124
.4
Program.
Cooling water used in this steam generation
electric olant is discharged directly to
(2) Obtain Commitment letter.*
JUN 73
SEP 73
3B2123
.3
the Red River. The increase in dissolved
3B2124
.6
salts and thermal degradation impose a
(3) Monitor effluent and stream to detect oollution
OCT 73
JUN 75
3B2123
0.05
threat to the water quality. The COE trans-
1evels.
ferred a copy of their discharge permit to
i
EPA on March 8, 1972. There have been no
(Enforcement Di v. -Enforcement and Permits
formal meetings with personnel from this
Branches)
plant as yet to improve the quality of their
effluent. Permits anticipates active
correspondence to begin late 1972.
i
1
I
1
1
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 11
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BV SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
1
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(P3CF - MAN - ::cs)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 751 FY 7c
USDI Baldhill Dain National Fish Hat-chery -
Valley City, N.D.
The COE Permit dated October 5, 1971 describes
the hatchery operation as hatching and rearing
various species of sport fishes in warm water
ponds, feeding the fish on organisms generated
through a natural food chain in the rearing
ponds. An organic pollution problem is pos-
sible from the discharges of fish fecal materia
and unused food. To date, no formal contacts
have been made with Bureau of Sport Fisheries
concerning their conservation practices.
Inter-agency cooperation will be obtained
to safeguard each agency's interests.
(1) Obtatn commitment from Game and Fish to
observe conservation practices to minimize
pollution load.*
(2) Monitor effluent and stream to detect potential
pollution load.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
FEB 73
J UN 74
MAY 73
JUN 74
3B2124
3B2123
.40
.40
USDI Valley City National Fish Hatchery,
Valley City, N.D.
The COE Permit dated October 5, 1971 describes
the hatchery operation as hatching and rearing
various species of sport fishes in warm water
ponds, feeding the fish on organisms generated
through a natural food chain in the rearing
ponds. An organic pollution problem is
possible from the discharges of fish fecal ma-
terial and unused food. To date, no formal
contacts have been made with Bureau of Sport
Fisheries concerning their conservation
practices. Inter-agency cooperation will be
obtained to safeguard each agency's interests.
(1) Obtain commitment from Game and Fish to
observe conservation practices to minimize
pollution load.*
(2) Monitor effluent and stream to detect potential
pollution load.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits
Branches)
FEB 73
JUN 73
MAY 73
JUN 74.
382124
3B2123
3B2123
i
.40
.40
.40
)
I
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BAS'IN SUMMARY-Continued
Page 12
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTl.ONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION JLGSPONSIB1LITY
DATES
INITIATION
COMPLETION
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
FY 73
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - HQS)
FY 74
FY 75
FY 76
Pil'lsbury Food - Grand Forks, N.D.
A COE discharge permit was forwarded to
our office on April 17, 1972 for the dis-
charge of air conditioner cooling water
to the Red River. The discharge is high
in dissolved salts. As yet there is no
State standards for DS concentrations;
therefore, [resting wi 11 be initiated in
"an'attempt to establish a workable DS
guideline. All sani tary wastes are
diverted to the municipal STP.
(1) Meet with company and State official and
develop a DS Standard.
(2) Develop effluent concentrations for plant
through RAPP program.
(3) Obtain corrriitment letter*
(4) Monitor stream to detect pollution levels.
(Enforcement Div.-Enforcement and Permits branches)
JUL 73
JUL 74
DEC 74
FEB 75
JUL 74
DEC 74
FEB 75
FEB 76
¦3B2124
3B2124
3B2123
3B2123
1.0
0.2
0.15
0.15
0.05
Grafton, ,N.D.
Located on the middle fork of the Park
River which is a tributary to Red River
of the North. The present population is
approximately 6000 and a 1990 design
f&recast of 7000 is expected. The City
is currently serviced by a two-cell
waste stabilization lagoon which is
organically overloaded. The treatment
project as proposed in the grant appli-
cation consists of a 2.25 aerated pre-
treatinent lagoon to treat the organic
overload modi fi cations to existing master
lift station, and a new lift station with
forced main. P]ians and specifications
furrently being prepared. Nutrient removal
not required.
(1) Process grant application, make grant, review
plans and specifications, be'jin construction.
(Air & Water—Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) Finalize construction, inspection, put plant
into operation. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
Waste Water Branch)
(3) 0&M Inspection. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
Waste Water Branch)
(4) Monitoring (if needed by S/A).
(5) If it is determined that nutrient removal is
required based on the water quality surveys and
analyses by S&A and DFIC, influence the State
and municipality to modify facilities to provid
for removal through construction grants aid.**
(S&A, MWW, Planning).
SEP 72
AUG 73
JUN 74
OCT 74
MAY 74
JUL 74
OCT 72
AUG 73
JUN 74
OCT 74
JUN 75
JUN 75
2B8162 1.2
2B8162
2B8163
.2B7160
2B2148
3B1123
2B8162
2B3149
1.2
$
.15
.2
.3
.30
.2
.2
.2
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
Page 13"
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK 4 ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
FY 73 FY 74- FY 75 FY 76
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - MPS)
Wahoeton, N.D.
Located on Red River of North. Present
population approximates 7100 people with
<500 students attending a local college.
The projected 1992 design population
will equal 16,500 people; At present,
the waste load from the community is
handled by a two-cell waste stabilization
lagoon and is organically overloaded. The
proposed project will consist of the
addition to the existing lagoon system of
an aerated cell. The aerated cell will
considerably reduce the organic load to
ti.e lagoon system. Project is currently
out for bids. Nutrient removal not
•included.
(1) Continue processing construction oriented
activities, contract award, finalize con-
struction, inspection, put plant expansion
into operation.
(Municipal Waste Water Branch-Air & Water Div.
(2) 0SM Inspection. (Air and Wafer Div.-
Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(3) Monitoring if necessary by S/A.
(4) If nutrient removal is required based on the
_ water quality surveys and analyses by S&A
'and DFIC, influence the State and municipality
to provide for removal through construction
grant aid. (S&A, MWW, Planning).**
SEP 72
MAY 74
OCT 74
JUL 74
M |l
AUG 73
MAY 74
ii >, ii
OCT 74
JUN 75
JUN 76
JUN 76
2B8162
2B0163
2B7160.
•2B2148
3B1123
2B8162
2B3149
.3
.30
.05
.2
.2
Abercrombie, N.D.
Located on the Red River of the North.
The 1970 population is listed at 260 with
350 people projected for 1990. Currently
the town is served by septic tanks and
cesspools. The town is presently plan-
ning a sewer system and has reauested a
construction grant for a lift station with
force main and a two-cell waste stabiliza-
'tion lagoon systejn. A construction grant
has been processed and plans ana SDecific?-
tions are currently being prepared.
(1)
(2)
P&S review, contract award, finalize con-
struction, put plant into operation and in-
spection'of facilities.
(A&W Div.-Municipal Waste Wati;r Branch)
O&M Inspection
Water Branch)
(A&W Div.-Municipal Waste
SEP 72
MAY 74
II
JUN 73
MAY 74
2B8162"
2B8163'
2B7160
1.0
.30
.05
-------
TABLE XII - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS pag9 14
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
(PROGRAM
'ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - riOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Park River, N.D.
Located on the South Branch of the Park
Siver which is tributary to the Red River
of the North. The 1970 population in
Park River by official census was 1,680,
and by the year 1990 a population of
2,200 is anticipated. The present treat-
ment facilities consist of a one-acre
aerated lagoon followed by one 20 and one
10-acre waste stabilization ponds operated
in series. The present project consists
'of.a lift station with force main which
services an annexed area previously
utilizing septic tanks. Construction on
project is essentially complete.
(1) 0&M Inspection.
(Air & Water Di v.-Municipal Waste Water Branch)
SEP 72
II It
OCT 72
tl II
2B8163
2B7160
.30 "
.05
i
A-r,enia, N.D.
(1) Pre-application review and conference.
FEB 73
FEB 73
2B8T62
.2
(Air and Water Div.-Municipal Wastewater
II II
II , II
2B3149
.2
Located on the Rush River which is tribu-
Branch, Planning Branch)
tary to Red River of the North. The town
presently 1s served by septic tanks and
(2) Processing of grant application, grant offer,
APR 73
OCT 73
2B8162
1.0
1 .2
cesspoo.ls. The 1970 population was re-
P&S review, contract award, finalize con-
ported as 100 people with a 1990 popu-
struction, put plant into operation and
lation of 150 people expected. The pro-
inspection. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
posed project will consist of a sewage
Waste Water Branch)
collection system and a two-cell waste
stabilization lagoon operated in series.
(3) 0&M Inspection. (A&W Div.-Municipal Waste
MAY 74
MAY 74
:2B8163
.30
Water Branch)
II II
II II
2B7160
.05
-------
TABLE III -
INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY-Continued
Panp IB
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
INITIATION COMPLETION
PROGRAM
ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PFfbr man - ;:os)
FY 73 1 FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
Valley City, N.D.
Located on the Sheyenne River which is
.tributary to Red River of the North. The
1970 city population was reported at
7 ,843 with the 1970 project area popu-
lation recorded at 52. The 1S92 projected
city population is 10,000 with 100 people
to be served by the project area. The
project will consist of a lift station
and force main to handle waste contri-
butions from an area previously unsewered.
Ultimate treatment of sewage will be pro-
vided by a two-cell waste stabilization
lagoon system.
(1) Continue processing construction activities,
put plant into operation, inspection.
(A&W Div.-Municipal Waste Water Branch)
(2) 0&H Inspection. (ASW Div.-Municipal Waste
Water Branch)
(3) If nutrient removal is required based on the
water quality surveys by SSA and DFIC,
influence State and municiplaity to provide for
removal through construction grant aid'.
(S&A, MWW, Planning).
AUG 72
AUG 73
AUG 73
JUL 74
AUG 72 2B8162
AUG 73
AUG 73
JUN 75
2B8163
2B7160
2B1123
2B8162
2B3149
..3
.30
.05
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Fi ve-Year Needs List
Currently, there are six projects on the
North Dakota 5-year needs list which are
in the Red River of the North drainage
basin. They are as follows:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Fargo, N.D.
Grafton, N.D.
Grand Forks,r
Valley City.r
k'ahpeton, N.D
West Fargo
Extens i on
t=» of
~ Interceptor
. Systems
Assumpti on
L,no data
available
here are no new treatment needs of major signi
^icance in the basin forssen at this time with
{ie possible exception of nutrient removal.
(1) Pre-application review and conference.
(Air and Water-Municipal Waste Water Branch,
Water Quality Planning)
(2) Processing of application, grant offer, P&S
review, contract award, construction,
inspection, put plant into operation.
(A&W-Municipal Waste Water Section)
(3) O&M Inspection. (Air and Water Div.-Municipal
Waste Water Branch)
(4) Provide for nutrient removal as noted pre-**
viously on a case-by-case basis.
JUN 74
JUN 74
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 75
JUN 76
JUN 75
JUN 75
2B8162
2B3149
2B8162
288163
2B7160
i.O
1 .00
.15
..6
.6
3.0
1 .00
.15
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Page 16
RED RIVFR BASIN SIIMMARY-Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
' ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
(PROF - MAN - tlOS)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
(7) Assess impact of new legislalion upon the
Facilities Management Grants Program.
(A&W Division-Program Planning Branch)
APR 73
MAY 73
•2B3149
.25"
State Proaram Plan:
Yearly, the EPA reviews and assesses
North Dakota's water program. A State
Program Plan is submitted to EPA as a
requirement to obtain supolerrental funding
from EPA fc the State's program. The
program plan contains information which
can assist other EPA operations.
(1) Coordinate State Program Plarr; with Basin
water quality management planning and con-
struction grants (i.e., one and five year
needs list, implementation schedule, standards,
program reviews). (A&W Division-Program
Planning, Program Support Branches)
(2) Update one and five year need; list.
(3) Approve North Dakota State Program Plan
OCT 72
OCT' 72
OCT,72
OCT 72
OCT 72
OCT 72
SEP 72
JUN 76
JUN'76
JUN '76
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
JUN 76
2B3149
2B8162.
--2B4153
?B8162
2B4153
2B2146
2B4153
.5
..25
.25
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.5
.25
.25
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.4
.25
.2
.3
.3
.3
1.0
.4
.25
.2
.3
.3
.3
.0
Construction Grants Administration:
For each new municipal wastewater facilitie
grant application, about one man-month is
spent processing the application for
administrative purposes.
(1) Process seven new application1; and complete
seven others. (See page 9 of Figure 7
SEP 72
JUN 76 -
¦2B8316
2.0
3.0
3.0
i.O
EIS Reviews:
Environmental assessments are written for
each construction grant project and each
.vater auality management plan. They need
to be reviewed to ceterrcine whether an
EIS will be needed or a negative declar-
ation can be issued.
(1) Review two water quality management plans and
seven construction grant applications.
SEP 72
JUN 76
2B6117
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 17
RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY - Continued
SITUATION ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
DATES
PROGRAM
'ELEMENT
MANPOWER REQUIRED
. (PROF - MAN - :;os)
INITIATION
COMPLETION
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 7<
Planmna Review of Construction Grant
Aool i cati ons :
Too often construction grant applicants
are not fully aware of the planning
aspect.s. of the proposed project. Also,
it is a Federal regulation (40CFR601)
that planning criteria be met prior to
offi.-ring a grant.
(1) Review construction grant applications for
conformance to water quality management
plan, compliance to water quality standards,
and environmental impact. (A&W Di-vision-
Program Planning Branch)
SEP 72
JUN 76
^ 2B3149
.6
-1.3 -
1 .0 ¦
.5-
Public demand for environmental news:
The success of the environmental program
in Region VIII is dependent upon public
backing and awareness. Also, public
cooperation helps EPA fulfill its regu-
latory responsibilities. As of yet, we
have not gained the full backing of the
people we represent (e.gr the majority
do not know that we exist).
(1) Keep the public aware of EPA activities and
environmental problems within the Red River
Basin via the news media.
(2) Encourage' Headquarters to finance the cost
of producing documentary film on water
quality management of rivers in the Rocky
Mountain Region which would include the
Red River of the North. (Management Divislon-
Publi c Affai rs).
SEP 72
SEP 72
JUN 76
NOV 72
5T1214 ¦
5T1214
.5
.25
.5
.5 ;
.5
Manpower and Traininq:
OSM of wastewater treatment plants de-
termine whether or not plant efficiency
will be maintained at their design level.
Most wastewater treatment plant operators
are not educated to operate plants
correctly. Consequently, training needs
to be provided which will fill this gap.
(1) Monitor 5(g)! training course for approx.
20 WWTP operators in Wahpeton, N.D. area.
(2) Monitor 5(g)! training course for approx.
15 WWTP operators in Grand Forks,N.D. area.
(3) Continue training support in Red River of the
North area.
(4) Coordinate Field Study Training Program
for wastewater treatment plant operators.
(5) Work with State on developing manpower
planning function.
(6) In-house manpower pianning-employment and
training project.
SEP 72
JAN 73
SEP 72
SEP 72
SEP 72
SEP 72
DEC 72 -
JUN 73
JUN 76
JUN(76
JUN;76 -
JUN/,76
*2B7158
^2B7158
•2B7158
-2B7158
-2B7161
•>2B7161
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
0.1
0.2
0.5
i
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
0.1
.2
.5
-------
TABLE III - INTEGRATED BASIN TACTICAL SOLUTION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 18
RED RIVEK BASIN SOnriAKY - Continued
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
DATES
PROGRAM
MANPOWER REQUIRED
SITUATION ANALYSIS
BY SUB TASK & ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBILITY
INITIATION
COMPLETION
'ELEMENT
(PROF -
MAN -
¦ IOS)
•
FY 73
FY 74-
FY 75
FY 76
(1) The Garrison Reservoir Water Project
(1) Assess the water quality impact of the pro-
SEP 72
JUN 76
-2B3149
.2
.4
.4
.4
will result in water being diverted tc
posed project and work with the Bureau of
the Red River Basin for irrigation
Reclamation to minimize the deleterious
purposes, (projected for 1978)
effects during the remaining interim
(2) Authorized COE reservoir on Sheyenne
planning stages. (A&W Division-Program
Planning Branch)
River near Kindred, N.D.
(3) Authorized COE reservoir on Wild
(2) Coordinate with the Bureau of Recreation
JAN 73
JUN 76
¦2B6117
.3
.3
1 .0
1.5
in the development and/or review of the
Rice River near Twinn Valley, Minn.
EIS for each project. (A&W Division-
Program Planning Branch)
(4) Proposed COE reservoir on Pembina
River near Park-River, N.D.
(3) - Evaluate the effects of each COE .project's
JUL 74
JUN 76 -<
^2B3149
_
1.0
2.0
(5) Proposed COE reservoir on Red Lake
induced flow regulation on accomplishment
plant objectives. Work with COE to minimize
River near Crookston, Minn.
the deleterious effects during the remaining
Major water resources such as these
interim planning stages. (Program Planning
Branch-A&W Division)
affect water quality in the basin. Pre-
caution must be taken to minimize the
envi ron'nental detriments resulting from
each project.
Each project that uses Federal monies for
(1) Determine whether 7 construction grant pro-
SEP 72
JUN 75
5T1214
.25
.75
.75
construction must be cleared under the
jects satisfy the Equal Employment Act
*
Equal Employment Act.
requi re'ments'.
Each Refuse Act Permit must be processed
(1) Process Permit Applications and Set up data
SEP 72
JUN 76
3B2124
1.0
2.2
2.0
2.0
and put on the computer for retrieval and
bank.
inter-office use.
-------
SECTION G
Point Source Reductions Required
-------
TABLE iV - WATER QUALITY 1 ,'!PROVEME.\T T1IUOUCII COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOURCE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES: American Crystal Sugar , D ray ton
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION ITEMS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE
(SEE T
LOADS REDUCTION
\BLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7rday-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS 6, TABLE III)
1
|
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
— n
TY
73
FY
7
FY
75
n
7(
:, (See TABLE II)
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7e
i
! BODs
Resolve problem with
BOD5 loading limitation
and monitor to assure.
65,800 ///day
607
14
2750
1
j
i
1 5.7 mg/1 max
No
ins
rear
st<
nda
id
l
compliance with
commitments.
i
TSS
16,171 ///day
134
!0
No data
Nn
i ns
rean
sr;
H
D. 0.
Total Coliform
6300/100 ml (mean)
5M/
lOOi
ll
^Standard changes durir
flows fall below the a\
g agricultural products pr
erage of the lowest 10% of
>cessing season. If the
all monthly flows o^"
record for Gither the rr
D.O. Standard does not
onths of April or May, whi
apply.
:hever is lower, then th
e
!
i
l
i
i
i
-------
TAW.I IV - WATER QUALITY I ^PUOVLMEN'T THROUGH CONDUCT ION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SUlUCE OR CLUSTER OF SObKCLS: American Crystal Sugar, K. Grand FnrVt;
WATER 01ALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I'l I MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE
(SEE T,
.OADS REDUCTION
\BLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
/
FY
75
FY
7f
. (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F\
76
1
1 bod5
Work with Region V to es-
tablish effluent require-
75,000 ///day
j
Detjermi
madje re
1
nat
gar
on 1
ing
jjill
jnee
be
led
17 mg/1
Nc
St
N.D
anda
. in
:d.
tre
im
! TSS
!
ments and obtain commit-
ments .
2,600
rec
ucti
ons |
.. 1
148 mg/1
Nc
St
N.D
anda
. in
rd .
tre
im
DO
3.2 mg/1
im g/
L
1
Total Coliform
3970/100
>000
/100ml
1
-------
TAi'I . ' - WATER r.'i. ALI j i' ,
INDIVIDUAL :ci: OR CLUSTER 0!"
i i >!."f.'-ijLi.i 10:. of actio:; iil::s
American Crystal Suear . Moorhead . Mi nnp^ni-a
v.'\11.R ObAUTY PARAMETERS
jaggregated actio:: : : ":s
iRL"ojiri;d for redic/iu..
I
PRESENT '."iSn: LOADS | '.."ASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(24 hr. - a-o) j (SEE TABLE III)
j PRESENT '.."ATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER 0UALITV
(7-day-l0 year fie")
(SEE W0S & TA3LE III)
i
i
(From TABLE III)
i fy fy
(See TABLE I) 1 72 73
¦ Fi
FY
75
A
ib
(See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
j
j BOD5
Work with Region V to
establish effluent
requirements and obtain
118,000 ///day
1 Determi
; made re
reduc ci
tiation wkll ibe 1
earning needed
Ens.' ! ! 34 trip/I
No
ins
rear
sr.
nrla
i
' TSS
commitments.
1 j I !
12,500 ///day T <
1 I :
i i N.n.
No
ins
rear
St.
nda
d
j
j DO
i 1 f i
! i 1
1 i
1
1 i 2.3 me/1
me/
1
Total Coliform
1
1 1
! !
j
j
' 27,000/100
nnn
1
100ml
1
!
1
1
1 1 1
1
!
i
I
1
1
i
1
|
1
1
(
1
!
1
1
i
-------
TAR I I. IV - WATER QUALITY I Ml'ROVLMLNT T1IKOUUI COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL so: KCE OR CLUSTER 01" SOURCES: American Crystal Sugar, Crookston, Minn.
water ouality parameters
AGGREGATED ACTION I T1 .MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY ' FY j FY
72 1 73 1 74
FY
75
FY
It
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
76
bod5
Work with Region V to
125,000 jf/dav
Determi
13 ri
m
TSS
establish effluent re-
quirements and obtain
commitments.
25,200 if/day
mad
red
2 re
icti
;arc
ms.
ing heec
i
1
ed
_ ...
DO
1
Total Coliform
1
1
-------
taih I i'1' - wati:k i'!i'Ki)vi'vii>.':'r •uiumu.n co.mpi.i.tiun oi; ai.rioti i i i-.ms
INDIVIDUAL ::CK OR CLUSTER 01" SOURCES: Fargo WWTP
W\II.K O'JALITY PARAMETERS
ACCRIXAl ED ACTION 1 1 I.MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS ) WASH. LOADS REDUCTION
(24 hr. - .ivc) (SlilL TABLE IIT)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-dny-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE T)
FY
72
FY
73
n
FY
75
F1
7(
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F"i
It
i
j BODS
Improvements under
1
1
3500 ///d 1
i ! 230C
•
f
i 34 rap/1
¦d
I TSS
4200 ///d
?4"in
1
No data
No
ins
:rear
St
nda
d .
DO
? 1
5mg
'1
Total Coliform
27.000/100 (mpanl
SM/-
00ml
^Standard changes during <.
If the flows fall below r\
gricultural products proce
le average of rhp Inwp.sr lf>
ssing season.
2
of all monthly flows of re
whichever is lower, then 1
cord for either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
of April or May,
apply.
1
-------
taiii i iv - wa'I'i:ii oiiai.i i >' i: ii'1:11V i u vr rnt:ui i«.ii cikii'i.k'i urn oi' At rum inn:
] ,'.'1)7 ViJH'Al. : tj!:KCi-: OK CLUSTER <>r t,Ohl;<;KS : Union Stockyards, West Fargo
U'.MWi OUAL1TY PARAMETERS
]AC.C.REGATED ACTION 1 I 1 .MS
RI'.QUIRKD TOR RB31K 1 ION1
PRESENT WASTE LOADS | WASTE
(24 hr. - nvf) j (SEE T/
.OADS INDUCTION
\1SLE Til)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
j
(Trom TABLE III)
(See TAIII.E I)
r'Y
¦7 0
FY
73
FY
FY
75
A
7H
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7 e
i
| BOD5
Determine effluent
requirements and monitor
782 ff/d
Det
mad
red
srmi
; re
jcti
18 tl
>arc
5ns
Jon w
!,ing
1
111
heec
be
ed
14.0 me/1
Ijn
ins
rean
Sti
nda
H
1
i TSS
5000 ff/d
184 mg/1
No
ins
rean
st;
nda.
H
i
DO
2.9 mg/1
5mg
'1
i
Total Coliform I
965/100
3250/100
5M/
.00ml
^Standard changes during c
gricultural products proce
ssing season.
of all monthly flows of re
whichever i q lower, then t
cord for either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
of April or May,
ipply.
I
-------
TAR I. I" IV - WATER OUALI'lY 1 M T K< J V KM K >JT TllKOUf.TI COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIIHJAI. Sill ICE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES : Fargo Water Filtration Plant
l.'M'EC QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION f 1 1IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE, LOADS
(24 hr. - jvc)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
1
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
fy
74
FY
75
FY
It
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7 £
i
1
¦ BOD 5
Improvements under
cons truction
i
I
i
M
TSS
40.000 ffID
tOM
~
i
! DO
2.3
mg/
Total Coliform
27.000/100 ("mean)
M/l
)Oml
^Standard changes during aj
If the flows fall below the
ricultural products proces
average of the lowest 10%
sing season,
of all
monthly flows of record foi
whichever is lower, then tf
either the months of Apri
e D.O Standard does not ap
L or May,
Jly.
!
-------
TAB I ! i*'' - WATER DUAL [TV I :!'f;0V[.,M[>!T T!!KOUQ( COMI'LKTICiV OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL sill !CK OR CLUSTER OK SOURCES : Armour Food - West Fargo
i\'AH"K ObALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION [ i ' ''IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
[ WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
i
j
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY j FY
72' 73
FY
FY
75
n
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F-i
7t
i
bod5
Obtain commitments and
negotiate with company
to encourage a sanitary
j Deierminat
j made ragar
5.4 ii/d j recjuctjjons
Lon
ling
'ill
nee
J
be
ied
1 14.0 mg/1
N<
in =
trea
n st
and.
rd
! Suspended Solids
sewer hook-up.
1 II
2.6 ///d j
I-
!
"
184 mg/1
Nc
ins
trea
n s t
andt
rd
1
D. 0
it
11
Z. 9 mg/1
5mf>/
1
Total Coliform
19,300/100 ml.
"
rr
ii
3250/100 ml (mean)
5M/J
00ml
*Standard changes during ag
ricultural products proces
»ing season.
If Ltlfei
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever is lower, then th
flowy fall below the avera;
ard for either the months <
e D.O. Standard does not a\
;e or the lowest ±U%
»f April or May,
¦ ply.
i
[
i
i
i
i
i
-------
TAl'il 1 IV - WATER OIJAUVi I :i l"M)V I TJIKOUdll COfll'EET I ON 01* AU'lUN I'lKMS
1NDIVIPUAI. Sni.KCC OK CLUSTER ni- SnUUC'I.S: Otter Tail Power Co., Wahpeton
I'VIIK QUALITY PARAMETERS
jA'IC.RECATED ACTION M : 'IS
(REQUIRED FOR REDUU 1
PRESENT I'ASTH LOADS
(2A hr. - jvc)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT HATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALI'l t
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
; (From TABLE III)
1 1
i FY' I FY
(See TABLE I) | 72: 73
,
FY
7 m
75
A
7C(
\ (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
r\
76
I 1 Obtain commitment
| | letter & monitor
i BOD5 | progress
833 ll/d
Detjermi
made re
re<|uct3
nat
gar
ons
Ion
ling
ill
nee
be '
led :
1 5.7 mg/1
Nc
ins
trea
n st
1.
' TSS
714 ///d
no data
11
1
; DO
5.5 mg/1
5 mg/
1
j Total Coliform
3560/100 (mean)
5M/1
00ml
^Standard changes during ag
ricultural products proces;
iing season.
1 If Llie riuws fall below ihe
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever iL lower, then th
average of ihe lowest 10%
3rd for either the months <
e D.O. Standard does not a]
>f April or May,
ply.
f
1
1
j
j
1
1
I
-------
TABU' rv - WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOi.'tCE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: Hinnkota Power Coop. - Grand Forks
I-.'ATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION J'l 1 MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEC TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WOS & TABLE III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
7^'
FY
75
¥\
It
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
li
i
1
1 BODc
i J
Develop water quality
effluent standards and
obtain commitments
1500 ///day
Det
mac
rec
ermi
e re
icti
iat]
*arc
:>ns
on v*
ing
ill
lee
be |
ed I
| 17.0 mg/1
No
in-
:tre
m s
anc
ird
TSS
5000 ///day
No data
No
in-
itre
m s
and
ird
DO
3.2 mg/1
5mg
'I
1 Total Coliform
Data not available
3970/100 ml
3000
/100ml
!^Standard changes during agr
If the flows fall below the
Lcultural products processi
average of the lowest 10%
ng season.
whichever is lower, then th<
, D.O. Standard does not ap
f April ui May,
ply.
1
i
i
i
>
¦
-------
TAIi'.r IV - WATER QUALl'IY I M'KOVEMIOT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SUi 'ICE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES: Pillsbury-Grand Forks
' \ PER 0UAL1TY PARAMETERS
jAGGREGATED ACTION TIT'IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCHuN
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
1 WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TAI5LE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
(From TABLE III)
(See TAB Li*; I)
FY
O
1 L.
FY
: 73
FY
FY
75
n
7
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FT
74
FY
75
FY
76
BODs
Develop effluent stds.
and obtain commitments
letter
37 . 2j?/dav
Det
mad
red
2rmi
i re
jcti
iati
;ara
>ns
on w
ing
111
:ieec
be |
ed j
l/.o ;:m'/: ....
11
..ins
r.eai
_SfJ
TDS
9160 #/dav
|
No data
DO
No data
1il me/I
'1
1
Total Coliform !
No data
3970/100ml
5M/
.OOml
^Standard changes during agricultural products process
If the flows fall i^elow t'nejaverage of the lowest 10%
of all monthlv flows of record for either the months o
ing season.
E April or Mav,
whichever is lower, then the
D.O. Standard does not ap
>ly.
1
!
i
i
-------
TAI'.M IV - WATER QlJAI.I'n J .-1 :'K( IVI M !¦'. '.'l1 TIIKOUf III COM I'LI"!' 1 ON OF ACTION ITI.MS
1 NDIV1DUAL Ml. U C !¦; OK CLUSTER or Hi I ;c. i;s : USDI-Baldhill Dam Nat'l Fish Hatchery, Valley City
l.Wir.K QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I I-! .MS
REQUIRED FOR KEDU(. '' 1 (iN
PRESENT WAS'LK LOADS
(24 tir. - nve)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
i
(From TABLE 111)
(See TABLE I)
FY'
1 i.
I"Y
t 73
FY KY
7 ->J 7 5
-1 i
76 (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F1)
7
i
1
j BOD5
Develop effluent standard;
and obtain commitment lett
er <1 /// day
Determi
made re
lat:
on v-
l np
111 be
npprl pH
i
i
16 mg/1
No
in-
tre
m s
d .
I
1 TSS
6 ///day
rec
ucti
jns
; 1
1
Nn data
No
in-
tre<
m s
d.
!
1
| DO
5.0 me/l
5mg
'1
1 1
1 |
| Total Coliform J
No data
4000/100ml
500
)/100ml
1
^Standard changes durina £
ericultural products prnrp
1
If the flows fall below tt
of all monthly flows of re
whichever iu lower, then t
e average of the lowest 10
cord tor either the months
he D.O. Standard does not
I
of April or May,
ippl v.
1
1
1
i
-------
TARt.l. 'V - WATER QUAL1 IY 1: 1i'i!0Y i.MLNT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION 1TKMS
INDIVIDUAL SlJl i:CE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: USDI Nat'l Fish Hatchery, Valley City
l-l.\;i:r duality parameters
! AGGREGATED ACTION l'i:..'iS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(2k hr. - ave)
VJASTi: LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS S TABLE III)
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
"FY
~7 O
n
73
Fi
/
FY
75
p) 1
76 1 , (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F")
7f
J BOD5
Develop effluent standard:
and obtain commitment
letter.
*11?/day
Det
be
nee
errni
made
ded
nat
re
redi
on h
ardi
ctic
|ill
rig
ns.
i
I
i 16 mg/1
Nr
i n-
;trp
1
!
! TSS
1
<1Z'/day
1
J
]
No da ta
II
1
1
! DO
5.0 me/I
img /
Total Coliform
No data
4000/100 ml
5
100/
IQQml
*Standard changes during ag:
"icultural products proces
sing season.
of all monthly flows of rect
whichever is lower, then the
average of nlie lowest 107.
rd for either the months o
D.O. Standard does not ap
f April or May,
3ly .
I
!
I
|
-------
TAIili IV - WATER OUALm I Ml 'IIOVWIK >.T THROUGH COUPLET/ON OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOL i!CE OR CLUSTER 01' SOURCES : Abercombie WWTP
1 Fi R QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I 11 .'IS
REQUIRED FOR REDHCTIUIi
PRESENT WASTE LOADS | WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(2A hr. - avc) J (SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
i
1
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY j FY
72] 73
FY
/ ^
FY
75
n
7 (
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
|
1 BODs
Construct secondary
WWTP
133 ///d
119
nearest downstream
station is at Fargo-data
1
1
1 TSS
1 Sft ti/H
14 3
|
1
j DO
i
5mg
/I
Total Coliform
no data
»M/1
DOOral
J
j |
1
*Standard changes during agiicultural products proces
sing season.
If the flows fall below the 1 average of the lowest 102
of all monthly flows of recird for either the months o
whichever lower, then th$ D.O. Standard does no apo
1
f April or Mav, 1
Ply. ' i
•
1
i
1
i
-------
TAT,I ' IV - l.'A'J !',K c^iJAI .1 i V I liTuVKMI.-i I IIIKOIJI .11 (.< >111'I ,ET I (>N Of ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL so; !;CE OR CLUSTER OI' SOURCES : Amenia
1 i 14 QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION I'll 'IS
REQUIRED TOR REDUC7UU
PRESENT ivASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - .ivo)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WOS 6, TABLE III)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
.;S3
FY
73
n
7-'
rv
75
FY
7
, (See TABLE 11)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
76
1
bod5
Construct new WWTP.
17 /'/day
J
[
f
15
;
1
i
1
i
i
| ilo station on Rush River
Nc
ins
;rea
I WQ
S
I
i TSS
20 ///day
|
i
18 | !
No
ins
:rea
1 WQ
:
1
j DO
.mg/
L
]
j Total Coliform
No data
>000
! lOOnil
^Standard changes during ag:
-icultural products process
ing season.
of all monthly flows of recc
whichever is lower, then th(
>rd for either the months o
D,0. Standard does not ap
f April or May,
ply.
1
1
-------
TABLE IV - WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH COMPLETION OF ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL SOL ICE OR CLUSTER OF SOURCES: Wahpeton Wastewater Treatment Plant
U.WTR QUALITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION 1'!7 MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - nvc)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 year flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE III)
1
|
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY1 ! FY
721 73
FY
/ -t
FY
75
n
7
, (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
F\
7
i
BOD5
Construct improvements to
WWTP 2100 ///day
146
\
i
! 5.7
Nc
in-
stre
m W
IS.
rss
2500 #/day
17 6(
t
i j
No data
No
in-
itre
im W
)S.
DO
5.5 mg/1
>. 0m
?/l
Total Coliform
No data
3560/100 ml
iOOO
/lOOml
^Standard changes during ag
'icultural products process
ing season.
of all monthly flows of rec<
whichever is lower, then th<
average of the lowesL 10%
>rd for either the months c
D.O, Standard does not ap
f April or Vav,
ply.
T. ...... .... ., _.
!
-------
TAIil, I 1/ - WATER QUALITi' li!r:ilA'l'.,MI';'.T I l.'KOUf.ll CfJMf'I.i-:'!' L(M\ 01' ACTION ITEMS
INDIVIDUAL MI( f!CE OR CLUSTER 01 SOUW.'I.S : Grafton, N.D. - Park River - Red River
WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
jAGGREGATED ACTION ITi.MS
REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - ave)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATED WATER QUALITY
(7-day-10 yea" flow)
(SEE WQS & TABLE TTl)
1
(From TABLE III)
(Sec TA11LE I)
FY
72
FY
73
F'i
/
FY
75
n
7f
! , (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
FY
7
BOD5
Improvements currently
under way.
1740 ///day
570
1
| 54 mg/1
i _
N<
in-
- = tre
im V.
}S.
TSS
2760 ///day
380
!
1
1
148 mg/1
Nc
in-
stre
im W
)S.
1
| DO
No Jata
1
¦9 mg/1
>mg/
1
i
J Total Coliform
No data
47400/100 ml
5
>00/
100ml
^Standard changes during ag
ricultural products process
ing season.
of all monthly flows of rec
whichever is lower, then th
Drd for either the months c
2 D.O. Standard does not a\
f April or May,
ply.
1
-------
TAIll.i IV - WATKH. QUALITY I '-irKOVHMF/iT TIIKOUC.1I COMPLFTIUN OK ACT [ON 1TKMS
INDIVIDUAL SfH.'KCE OR CLUSTER OF SOUKCKS: Fosston. Minnesota
WAT I R Ol!AI,ITY PARAMETERS
AGGREGATED ACTION 1'1 1 .-IS
REQUIRED FOR REDUC 1 KiN
PRESENT WASTE LOADS
(24 hr. - civo)
WASTE LOADS REDUCTION
(SEE TABLE III)
PRESENT WATER QUALITY
ANTICIPATE
(7-day-10
(SEE WQS &
D WATER
year flc
TABLF
QUALITY
w)
II)
i
(From TABLE III)
(See TABLE I)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
75
FY
7(
1 , (See TABLE II)
FY
72
FY
73
FY
74
FY
75
7
i
i BOD5
Work with Region V to
determine needs.
9,000 iHday
Nee
wiJ
ded
1 b€
red
de
jcti
:erm
ns
inec
1
No data
TSS
10,500 ///day
!
J DO
1
1
Total Coliform
i
J
|
1
------- |