REMEDIAL ACTION MASTER PLAN
AND
PROJECT WORK STATEMENT
WESTERN PROCESSING
KENT, WASHINGTON
FOR
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO
January 28, 1983
BLACK & VEATCH, CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Kansas City, Missouri
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Page
4.3 Initial Remedial Action 27
4.3.1 Community Relations Plan 27
4.3.2 Cleanup of Spills on Open Ground 27
4.4 Remedial Investigation 28
4.5 Feasibility Study 28
4.6 Remedial Design 29
4.7 Implementation 30
4.8 Post-Cleanup Monitoring 30
REFERENCES 31
APPENDIX
A - On-Site Drum Storage
B - Sampling Results March 1980
C - Sampling Results May 1982
D - Project Work Statement and Opinion of Probable Cost for the
Initial Remedial Measure
E - Task Descriptions and Budget Level Cost Estimate for the
Remedial Investigation
F - Task Descriptions and Budget Level Cost Estimate for the
Feasibility Study
LIST OF FIGURES
Following
Page
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map 3
Figure 2 - Site Layout (1960) 5
TC-2
-------
3
4
5
: 6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LIST OF FIGURES
(Continued)
Following
- Site Layout (1968) 5
- Site Layout (1974) 5
- Site Layout (1980) 6
- Sample Locations (June 1969-March 1982) 11
- Sample Locations (May - June 1982) 11
- Normal Project Approach 21
- Remedial Action Sequence 23
- Remedial Action Schedule 26
LIST OF TABLES
Page
- Summary of Sampling Efforts 11
- Sampling Results (June 1969) 12
- Sampling Results (February 1970) 12
- Sampling Results (January 1976) 13
- Sampling Results (March 1980) 13
- Sampling Results (June 1981) 14
- Sampling Results (December 1981) 15
- Sampling Results (March 1982) 16
TC-3
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Page
Table 9 - Sampling Results (June 1982) 18
Table D-l - Opinion of Probable Cost for the
Initial Remedial Measure D-3
Table E-l - Budget Level Cost Estimate for the E-3
Remedial Investigation
Table F-l - Budget Level Cost Estimate for the F-3
Feasibility Study
TC-4
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Remedial Action Master Plan (RAMP) is to provide
a general planning tool for the use of those organizations or agencies
responsible for overseeing the cleanup of Western Processing Company,
Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as Western Processing) in Kent,
Washington. This RAMP includes a description and history of the site
and past sampling efforts, an overall remedial action schedule at the
project level of detail, a description of the remedial activities pro-
posed for the site, a project work statement and opinion of probable cost
for an initial remedial measure, and task descriptions and budget level
cost estimates for the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study.
1.2 Background and Need for Action
Western Processing is an active chemical reprocessing facility which
began operations in 1957 and moved to its present location in 1961.
Sampling efforts conducted by local, state, and Federal agencies have
revealed high concentrations of metals in surface water on and adjacent
to the site.
State requests to the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for help in cleanup of the site led to a search for funds to perform
remedial actions. Funds from Section 311K of the Clean Water Act were
considered, but the site did not meet the criteria to receive these funds.
The site was placed on EPA's Expanded Interim National Priority List of
160 uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, issued in July 1982, making the
site eligible for remedial action under the Comprehensive Environmental
012883 1
-------
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), better known
as "'Superfund".
The need for remedial action at Western Processing is based on the
following environmental concerns:
o Elevated levels of metals have been detected in surface
water and soil on and adjacent to the site.
o The potential exists for groundwater contamination.
o Elevated levels of organics have been detected in surface
water adjacent to the site.
012883
n
-------
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY
2. 1 Location
Western Processing is an active chemical reprocessing facility lo-
cated at 7215 South 196th Street in Kent, King County, Washington (see
Figure 1). Garmt J. Nieuwenhuis is the Chairman of the Board of Western
Processing. The Western Processing site covers an area of approximately
13 acres in Section 1, Township 22 North, Range 4 East. The site is in
an area of recently developed light industry. It is bounded on the west
by McDonald Industries, on the northwest by Mill Creek and residential
property, on the north by South 196th Street, on the east by a jogging
path and drainage ditcii, and on the south by an undeveloped area.
2.2 Hydrologic and Geologic Setting
The Western Processing site lies in the floodplain of the Green
River at an elevation of about 20 feet msl. The Green River basin has a
drainage area of 483 square miles at its mouth about seven miles below
the Western Processing site. The Green River is not a source of domestic
water supply downstream of Western Processing. This area receives about
40 inches of rainfall per year, most of which occurs from October to
March. Precipitation exceeds evaporation in the area by about 9 inches.
Mill Creek drains the area to the south of Western Processing. The
discharge is collected at pumping stations and pumped over the flood
control dike into the Black River (a tributary of the Green River). A
railroad drainage ditch drains the area between the Chicago Milwaukee
St. Paul and Pacific Railroad tracks and a jogging path, and an area east
of the same railroad tracks south of the Western Processing site. This
012883 3
-------
I
RAILROAD
& DRAINAGE
"'<2. DITCH
WESTERN ^
PROCESSING
196 th. STREET
SOUTH
¦{ Mc DON A L 0
it INDUSTRIES
m
m m
WESTERN PROCESSING
VICINITY MAP
SCALE l" = IOOO
FIGURE I
-------
ditch flows into Mill Creek about one-quarter mile north of the site.
The powerline right-of-way drainage ditch (see Figure 3) receives runoff
from the area along the east property line of Western Processing west of
the jogging path. A berm along the south end of the site prevents
additional runoff from entering the powerline right-of-way drainage
ditch. The ditch crosses South 196th Street to a ponding area on the
north side of the street (see Figure 6). This pond will probably
overflow into Mill Creek during periods of significant flow in the
powerline right-of-way drainage ditch.
The surficial geology of the region consists of alluvial deposits
of clay, silt, sand, gravel, and peat. The Western Processing site is
underlain by silt and sand of post-glacial origin over sands and gravels
of Pleistocene Age. Groundwater is encountered both in a shallow aquifer
at a depth of 10 feet below the land surface and in a deeper artesian
aquifer below confining layers of silt and clay. Where the water table
of the shallow aquifer is below the potentiometric surface of the
artesian aquifer, any vertical movement of water between the two aquifers
would be directed up through the confining layers from the artesian
aquifer into the shallow aquifer. This condition may not be character-
istic of the entire area. There are four deep wells in the area
down-gradient of Western Processing within a one-mile radius of the site.
2.3 Site History
Western Processing has interim status under the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as a storer of hazardous waste materials.
The firm began operations as a reprocessor of animal by-products and
brewer's yeast. Operations have been expanded to include the recovery
012883 4
-------
of heavy metals; reclamation of flue dust; recovery of waste solvents;
neutralization of acids and caustics; chemical recombination to produce
zinc chloride and lead chromate; reclamation of ferrous sulfide in
fertilizer production; electrolytic destruction of cyanides; reclamation
of metal finishing by-products; and reprocessing of pickle liquor.
An official of Western Processing reported that the site was used
as a NIKE missile facility prior to its sale to Western Processing in
1961 (see Figure 2). By 1968, the site had undergone several major
alterations (see Figure 3). The tributary to Mill Creek which flowed
across the southwest corner of the Western Processing facility had been
diked at the south fence line. A ground depression in the southern part
of the site had collected rainwater and formed a pond and a swampy area.
Chromic hydroxide sludges were dumped near the pond. An area of ponded
water had also formed outside of the fence near the northeast corner of
the facility. A series of six storage lagoons had been constructed on
the west side of the site to hold acid, caustic, and cyanide wastes.
Further changes had been made to the site by 1974 (see Figure 4).
The pond in the southern part of the site was considerably smaller. The
remainder of the previous ponded area was filled with construction
debris. A wastewater lagoon had been constructed in the northeast corner
of the site. The greenish color of the material in the lagoon was
characteristic of chromium wastes. The lagoon also contained floating
oil at the north end and precipitated solids on the bottom. A storm
water pond was constructed west of the wastewater lagoon. The six
storage lagoons had been filled with unidentified material and were
012883
5
-------
S0UTHl96th.
h
DATE:6/27/60
DEVELOPED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
KEY-
I. MAIN GATE
2. MILL CREEK
3. POSSIBLE MILITARY
BARRACKS
4 POSSIBLE MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS FOR MISSILES
5. POSSIBLE MISSILE
STORAGE AREA
6. CYCLONE FENCE
7. TRIBUTARY OF MILL CREEK
a PUBLIC DIRT ROAD
a RAILROAD DRAINA6E
DITCH
10. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE ST.-
PAUL AND PACIFIC
RAILROAD
WESTERN PROCESSING
SITE LAYOUT (I960)
SCALE l" = 150' i
FIGURE 2
-------
SOUTH I96
mm®
r
KEY".
!. MAIN GATE
2. MILL CREEK
3. PONDED WATER
4 CHLORINE 6AS TANK STORASE
HOUSE
5. STORAGE LAGOONS FOR ACID/
CAUSTIC/CYANIDE WASTES
6. POWERLINE RI8HT-0F-WAY
DRAINAGE DITCH
7. RAILROAD DRAINAGE DITCH
8. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD
9. PUBLIC DIRT ROAD
10. 55-GALLON DRUM STORAGE
AREA
I L LABORATORY
12. SOLVENT RECOVERY PLANT
AND STORAGE AREA
13. FERTILIZER PLANT
14. BULK STORAGE TANKS
15. SCRAP METAL/CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS
16. CHROMIC HYDROXIDE SLUDGES
17. POND AND SWAMPY AREA
16. CYCLONE FENCE
19. PONDING AREA WITH DIKE
DEVELOPED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DATE: 4/9/68
WESTERN PROCESSING
SITE LAYOUT (1968)
SCALE l"= 150' t
FIGURE 3
-------
aouTH lt« t>.
DEVELOPED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DATE : 3/20/74
KEY:
L MAIN GATE
2. WASTEWATER LAGOON
3. STORM WATER POND
4. CHLORINE GAS TANK STORAGE
HOUSE
5. MILL CREEK
6. 55-GALLON DRUM STORAGE
AREA
7. SOLIDS POND
8. STORAGE LAGOONS FOR ACID/
CAUSTIC/CYANIDE WASTES
9. EMPTY STORAGE LAGOONS
10. POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
DRAINAGE DITCH
11. RAILROAD DRAINAGE DITCH
12. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD
13. LABORATORY
14. SOLVENT RECOVERY PLANT
AND STORAGE AREA
15. FERTILIZER PLANT
16. CYCLONE FENCE
17. BULK STORAGE TANKS
18. COOLING WATER LAGOONS
19. POND AND SWAMPY AREA
20. CHROMIC HYDROXIDE SLUDGES
21. SCRAP METAL/CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS
22. PUBLIC DIRT ROAD
23. PONDING AREA WITH DIKE
WESTERN PROCESSING
SITE LAYOUT(1974)
SCALE l" = 150" t
FIGURE 4
-------
replaced by eight lagoons on the east side of the main drive. The new
lagoons were constructed above ground using large cement blocks and
impervious membrane liners. Three additional lagoons had also been
constructed. Two of these, which were used for cooling water, were
located in the south-central part of the site. The third was located
immediately east of the series of eight lagoons. An unlined solids pond
was constructed near the west site boundary.
Between 1974 and 1977 the ponding area at the south end of the plant
was completely filled with debris (see Figures 3, 4 and 5). By 1980,
the entire area where the pond had been located was covered by foundry
sand, scrap metal, and construction debris. The two cooling water
lagoons were filled with unidentified material and were replaced by five
lagoons along the west boundary of the site. More recently, the waste-
water lagoon in the northeast corner, three of the eight storage lagoons
for acid, caustic, and cyanide wastes, the lagoon immediately east of
these eight, and the storm water pond have been filled with unidentified
material.
Western Processing has on three occasions obtained wastewater dis-
charge permits from the Washington Department of Ecology (DOE). The
first permit, which was in effect between 1966 and 1971, permitted
Western Processing to discharge up to 50,000 gallons per day of process
water into Mill Creek. The second permit, in effect during most of 1972,
allowed Western Processing to discharge through infiltration up to 50,000
gallons per day of treated wastewater and storm water from a septic tank
near the center of the property (exact location unknown) into the
012883
6
-------
gftiiTu i»g Ml /STREET
KEY :
L MAIN GATE
2. FILL MATERIAL
3. 55-GALLON DRUM STORAGE
AREA
4. CHLORINE GAS TANK STORAGE
HOUSE
5. NAPHTHA STORAGE TANKS
6. FOUNDRY SAND
7 RAILROAD DRAINAGE DITCH
8. MILL CREEK
9. SOLIDS POND
10. STORAGE LAGOONS FOR ACID/
CAUSTIC/CYANIDE WASTES
11. LABORATORY
12. COOLING WATER LAGOONS
13. SOLVENT RECOVERY PLANT
WITH STORAGE AREA
14. FERTILIZER/EXOSKELETON
PLANT
15. BULK STORAGE TANKS
16. CYCLONE FENCE
17. POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
DRAINAGE DITCH
18. PUBLIC JOGGING TRACK/DIRT
ROAD
19. CHICAGO MILWAUKEE ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD
20. SCRAP METAL/CONSTRUCTION
DEBRIS
21. PONDING AREA WITH DIKE
22. EMPTY STORAGE LAGOON
23. FLUE DUST PILES
1 * Yir i \V
DEVELOPED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DATE = 4/27/80
WESTERN PROCESSING
SITE LAYOUT(1980)
SCALE l" = 150" t
FIGURE 5
-------
groundwater. This discharge was to be treated on-site in a series of
holding lagoons and a sand filter bed. The third discharge permit was
in effect between 1976 and 1981. This permit authorized Western
Processing to discharge up to 50,000 gallons per day of treated waste-
water and storm water into the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
(METRO) sanitary sewer system.
Western Processing made application in June 1982 to METRO for a
permit to allow them to discharge into the sanitary sewer system.
Western Processing also made application to the DOE during July 1982 to
permit surface discharge into Mill Creek. Action on these permit
applications is pending.
Documentation exists regarding two spills that have taken place at
the Western Processing facility which have affected the surrounding area.
In November 1973, heavy rainfall filled an open-top waste oil holding
tank and forced an undetermined quantity of oil onto the ground. The
oil reached Mill Creek through a drain tile. A second spill occurred in
October 1975 when a 50,000 gallon tank of coal tar base naphtha
overflowed and spread fumes throughout the surrounding area.
2.4 Current Site Description
Comprehensive visual inspections of the Western Processing site were
made in May 1982 by representatives of the EPA and DOE and in June 1982
by representatives of the EPA. The former inspection was performed to
determine compliance with the Interim Status Standards (ISS) of RCRA.
After this inspection, a Compliance Order was issued to Western
Processing which itemized 28 violations, nine of which were to be
012883
/
-------
corrected within a 14 day period. The latter inspection, conducted to
determine the company's compliance, found that on at least five of the
violations there was no evidence of compliance. The site description
which follows is primarily comprised of observations from these site
inspections.
Surface drainage on the site flows to a central sump located in the
southwest corner of the solvent recovery storage area (see Figure 5).
The water collected in the central sump is transferred.to the cooling
water lagoons along the west boundary of the site where it is used in
the solvent recovery process.
A "cyclone" type fence surrounds the Western Processing plant. The
main gate to the plant at the northwest corner is normally used for site
access. A second gate near the midpoint of the fence on the south side
of the site was chained and padlocked. Three breaks were observed along
the west boundary which could provide site access. The first, a break
of 16 to 20 feet, is adjacent to the southwest corner of the solids pond.
The second break is about 150 feet north of the south site boundary.
The third location is an eroded area one to three feet deep below the
fence bottom along the northwest side of the site. Nine warning signs
intended to discourage entrance to the site are located along the fence
on the north, east, and south sides of the site. No access warning signs
were observed along the west side of the property.
A partial inventory list of the drums stored on-site is included in
Appendix A. As noted in the appendix data, many of the drums are
leaking, corroded, and bulging. Numerous areas of spilled material from
012883
8
-------
drums were observed around the site. In several locations drums
containing incompatible combinations of cyanides and ketones; acids and
caustics; acids or caustics and formaldehyde; acids and ethyl amine; and
acids or strong caustics and chlorinated organics were stored together.
An unknown number of bulk storage tanks are also stored on the site.
Production of fertilizer in the building near the east side of the
plant was discontinued several years ago. Small quantities of metals
including iron,-zinc, copper, chromium, and cadmium were added as part
of the fertilizer production process.
The solvent recovery plant consists of two boilers located inside
buildings and two stills located outside where the distillation of
halogenated and non-halogenated solvents takes place. The still bottoms
from this distillation process are the only waste presently produced
according to company officials. The bottoms are dumped on a pile (exact
location unknown) which has no liner or leachate collection mechanism.
Two piles of flue dust are located at the south end of the site
(see Figure 5). The pile along the south fence is believed to lie on a
concrete pad. Partially-visible concrete blocks provide containment.
The pile southeast of the cooling water ponds lies directly on the
ground. The site inspectors noted that the central sump will not collect
runoff from either pile.
An official of Western Processing advised that the solids pond
contains a mixture of heavy metals from pickle liquor and electroplating
wastes. These metals are concentrated by precipitation, removed after
settling and placed in the pond. The wastes in the solids pond are
contained by a soil berm which had less than two feet of freeboard at
012883 9
-------
the time of the initial inspection. The berm showed areas of sloughing
and moistness.
The wastewater lagoons immediately east of the access road are lined
with single-piece, polyfilm liners. The liner material for each lagoon
was selected based on the lagoon contents. The northernmost lagoon
contains acidic waste containing some methylene chloride which, according
to company officials, was placed directly in the lagoon without treat-
ment. It was also reported that one delivery of waste was treated (the
process is unknown) in the impoundment in order to reduce the concen-
tration of phenol.
A soil berm approximately eight to ten feet high has been con-
structed along the north and east sides of the Western Processing site
since the June 1982 inspection.
2.5 Sampling Efforts
Since 1969, ten significant sampling efforts have been undertaken
on and around the Western Processing site as summarized in Table 1. The
majority of these have involved surface water sampling in Mill Creek and
in the drainage ditches which run along the east side of the site.
Limited sediment samples and water samples taken from a well point five
feet below the bottom of the streambed (hereinafter referred to as well
point samples) have also been taken on these streams. Sampling on the
Western Processing site has been limited to the storm water holding pond
and wastewater lagoon which were located in the northeast corner prior
to 1980. In addition to the nine completed sampling efforts, a ground-
water investigation was initiated in October 1982 by the EPA. This
investigation is currently in progress.
012883 10
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING EFFORTS
Date
Sample Location
Samples Collected
Taken Bv*
06/12/69
See Figure
6
3 Water
WWPCC
02/05/70,
02/25/70
See Figure
6
3 Water
METRO
01/27/76
See Figure
6
3 Water
DOE
03/25/80
See Figure
6
2 Water
EPA
06/11/81,
06/25/81
See Figure
6
4 Water
METRO
12/31/81
See Figure
6
2 Water
METRO
03/23/82
See Figure
6
8 Water
DOE
05/20/82
See Figure
7
8 Water, 4 Well
Point, 11 Sediment
EPA
06/30/82
See Figure
1
/
4 Water,
1 Sediment
DOE
Ongoing (Initiated EPA
10/82)
" WWPCC - Washington Water Pollution Control Commission
METRO - Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
DOE - Washington Department of Ecology
EPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency
The initial sampling efforts at Western Processing were undertaken
by the Washington Water Pollution Control Commission (WWPCC) as the
result of discussion of waste discharge into the sanitary sewer. In
June 1969, three samples were taken from the wastewater lagoon near the
northeast corner of the site. The results of these sample analyses are
presented in Table 2.
0128S3
11
-------
KEY :
L (6/12/69)
2. (2/05/70,2/25/70)
3. (1/27/76)
4. (3/25/80)
5. (6/11/81, 6/25/81)
TWO SAMPLES AT EACH LOCATION
6. (12/31/81)
TWO SAMPLES AT MANHOLE
7. (3/23/82)
NOTE:
ALL WATER SAMPLES,SOME
LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
SOUTH 196 th. STREET
¦?/
POND
WESTERN
PROCESSING
PONDING AREA>\
WITH DIKt
POWERLINE RK3HT-0F-WAY
DRAINAGE DITCH
— 5
WESTERN PROCESSING
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
(JUNE 1969 — MARCH 1982)
NC7 TO SCALE
FIGURE 6
-------
KEY:
IW- SURFACE WATER SAMPLE (5/82)
IWP — WELL POINT SAMPLE (5/82)
IS-SEDIMENT SAMPLE (5/82)
2W — SURFACE WATER SAMPLE (6/82)
2S — SEDIMENT SAMPLE (6/82)
IW.IS
SOUTH 196 Th.
IW,IWP, IS,2W
IW,IWP,IS
2W
STREET IWP.2W—i
IW,IWP,IS-
r-iw,is
PONG
WESTERN
PROCESSING
tW,!S
PONDING AREA
WITH DIKE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
DRAINAGE DITCH
WESTERN PROCESSING
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
(MAY-JUNE 1982)
NOT i w ^CA L L
FIGURE 7
-------
TABLE 2
SAMPLING RESULTS (June 1969)
Center
of
South end of
North end of
Analysis
Lagoon
(mg/1)
Lagoon (mg/1)
Lagoon (mg/1)
Alkalinity
2,600
2,650
2,600
PH
9.2
9.2
9.2
Total Solids
12,000
12,400
12,200
Non-Volatile Solids
10,100
10,300
10,200
Aluminum
90.0
52.0
60.0
Calcium
61.0
40.0
50.0
Chromium
90.5
52.0
69.0
Copper
3.2
2.1
2.5
Iron
5.0
4.0
5.0
Nickel
0.9
0.7
0.8
Similar concentrations of metals were found in samples taken in February
1970 in the same lagoon as presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3
SAMPLING RESULTS (February 1970)
Analysis
Aluminum
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Nickel
Zinc
Powerline Right-of-Way
Drainage Ditch (mg/1)
4.1
1.2
157.0
Lagoon (mg/1) Mill Creek (mg/1)
4.7
104.0
20.4
6.75
32.0
22.0
Not Detected
Not Detected
Not Detected
0.05
7.5
0.10
Additional samples were taken by the DOE in the wastewater lagoon
and the powerline right-of-way drainage ditch in January 1976,
immediately prior to issuance of the DOE discharge permit which allowed
Western Processing to be connected to the sanitary sewer. The results
of the sample analyses are presented in Table 4.
012883
12
-------
TABLE 4
SAMPLING RESULTS (January 1976)
Lagoon
Powerline Right-of-Way
Drainage Ditch
Analvsis
(mg/1)
Upstream (mg/1)
Adjacent to Lagoon (mg/1)
Cadmium
20.5
0.01
0.5
Chromium
60.0
0.01
1.4
Copper
35.0
0.01
2.6
Lead
2.5
0.01
0.5
Mercury
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
Zinc
200.0
0.5
3.8
In March 1980 the EPA collected two water samples from Mill Creek,
one upstream and one downstream of the Western Processing site. The
results of the sample analyses for metals are presented in Table 5. The
results of the analyses for volatiles, pesticides, and acid and base/
neutral extractable compounds are presented in Appendix B.
TABLE 5
SAMPLING RESULTS (March 1980)
Mill Creek
Upstream of Western Downstream of Western
Analysis Processing (mg/1) Processing (mg/1)
Antimony 2.0 2.0
Arsenic 0.003 0.004
Beryllium 0.3 0.3
Cadmium 0.0005 0.015
Chromium 0.002 0.04
Copper 0.007 0.017
Lead 0.046 0.04
Mercury 0.00009 0.00009
Nickel* 0.056 0.073
Selenium 2.0 2.0
Silver 0.3 0.3
Thallium 2.0 2.0
Zinc 0.06 0.66
012883 13
-------
The METRO conducted sampling for metals analysis during June 1981.
This analysis was conducted to assess the quality of the water in Mill
Creek and to evaluate the desirability of Western Processing's continued
discharge to the sanitary sewer system. Two samples were collected in
Mill Creek on each of two days, one upstream and one downstream of the
Western Processing facility. The data from the sample analyses are shown
in Table 6.
TABLE 6
SAMPLING RESULTS (June 1981)
Mill Creek
Analysis Upstream of Western Processing Downstream of Western Processing
6/11/81 (mg/1) 6/25/81 (mg/1) 6/11/81 (mg/1) 6/25/81 (mg/1)
Cadmium 0.006 0.006 0.061 0.03
Chromium 0.02 0.04 0.04 <0.04
Copper 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.04
Iron 6.54 5.8 8.04 9.02
Nickel < 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.2
Lead <0.02 <0.02 < 0.02 0.02
Zinc 0.042 0.01 3.67 1.79
The METRO conducted additional sampling in December 1981 at the sanitary
sewer manhole nearest to the south fenceline of Western Processing. The
analyses of these two samples for metals indicated contaminant levels
below the METRO discharge limits as shown in Table 7.
012883
14
-------
TABLE 7
SAMPLING RESULTS (December 1981)
METRO
Discharge
Analysis Manhole Near South Fenceline (mg/1) Limits (mg/1)
pH
Cadmium
Chromium
7.3
0.01
0.02
0. 17
0.18
0.12
7.6
0.01
0.02
1.01
0.14
0.13
>5.5
3.0
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.0
1.0
5.0
Copper
Nickel
Lead
Silver
Zinc
Not Detected
5.0
Not Detected
4.22
The DOE collected two water samples in the railroad drainage ditch
and three water samples each in the powerline right-of-way drainage ditch
and Mill Creek in March 1982. The results of the sample analyses are
shown in Table 8.
The EPA conducted a sampling effort in May 1982 to verify the
findings of other agencies and to determine if elevated levels of
priority pollutants were present. Analyses were conducted for all the
priority pollutants, plus the additional contaminants identified under
the Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Sediment samples were taken on
all four sides of the property. Surface water samples were obtained from
the ponded water at the bermed stream at the south boundary of the site,
the railroad and powerline right-of-way drainage ditches, and Mill Creek.
Well point samples were taken in Mill Creek upstream, adjacent to, and
downstream of the site to measure possible contamination of interstitial
groundwater below the streambed.
012883
15
-------
TABLE 8
SAMPLING RESULTS (March 1982)
rC
X.
a
o aj
01
AJ (U
4-1 4-1
4J
•H 4-J
*rH *H
i
l x
i
•rH
a -h
Q C/5
oo
Ml
60
<4-1 X 4-1
IM X
to
Cl
rt
ti
o
O 42
o O D
o a
a)
OJ M-(
•H
H
rH
i
4-1 4-J
1 4-1 o
1 4-1
CO M-t
t)0 o
01
to
to
u
•H d
J-J -r-l C/5
4-1 -H
o
03 O
nj
01
cn
(0
,C
Q O
X O
X! Q
a
C TJ
QJ
a)
>n
•H QJ
a
cd C
aJ W
>4-1 O
o
o
O
od
bo M-4
0)
Oi 60 <1)
0i 60
•rH
M -H
M O M
u
6
u
cd o
0)
a 0 n
n)
o
Q O
Q ^
01 P-i
a) i
a>
a) I
X,
QJ
G
u
> W
v£)
3 3 >X5
5
td
•h nj
•h ni
A 1
•rl P. 01
•H T3
QJ
d
O
0)
o
cd CX (T\
O rt o cri
o n)
0)
cd ai
nj 0)
Analysis
s
-------
The complete results of the May 1982 sampling are presented in
Appendix C. The results can be summarized to indicate the degree of
contamination by determining an additive concentration of pollutants.
These values were obtained by summing the individual concentrations of
each of the contaminants identified above for each sample location. The
surface water samples in Mill Creek showed an increase in additive con-
centrations of priority pollutants from 31 ug/1 to 2^68 ug/1 between the
upstream and downstream sampling locations. The ponded water at the
south boundary of the site contained seven identifiable compounds with
an additive concentration of 38 ug/1. The railroad drainage ditch showed
an increase in additive concentrations of contaminants from 495 ug/1 to
9,668 ug/1 between a point near the upstream end of the Western
Processing plant and a point downstream of Western Processing. The
analysis of sediment samples from Mill Creek indicated an increase in
additive concentrations of priority pollutants from 806 ug/kg upstream
of the site to 87,000 ug/kg at South 196th Street. Sediment samples on
the powerline right-of-way drainage ditch contained an additive concen-
tration of priority pollutants of 955,600 ug/kg adjacent to the site
compared to 75,500 ug/kg downstream of the site. The well point sample
data was considered impossible to interpret without additional hydro-
geologic data.
The DOE collected five samples in June 1982. These included a
sediment sample at the location of the ponded water area at the down-
stream end of the powerline right-of-way drainage ditch and a surface
water runoff sample from the north end of the site. The results of these
analyses are shown in Table 9.
012883 17
-------
TAB 1,1'. 9
SAMPLING RESULTS (June 1982)
lipsLream of Western
M i J 1
At SonLli 196lli
Creek
Downstream of Western
SiLe Runoff at
Pond i ng
Ana 1ys Ls
Processing (nig/1)
Street (mg/1)
Processing (mg/1)
Norlli End (mg/1)
Area (i
Cadini nm
< 0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.10
0.42
Clirom i inn
<0.01
0.01
0.01
0.46
8.8
Copper
0.09
0.1 1
0.14
0.52
7.7
Lead
0.03
<0.02
<0.02
0.31
2.6
N i ckel
<0.02
0.05
0.08
0.40
1.17
Z i nc
0.04
0.08
0.14
15.0
38.0
I'll
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.9
5.8
Sp. Conductivity
(umbos/ cm)
76
81
76
933
--
COD (mg/1)
--
--
--
140
--
Chloride as CI
(mg/1)
4
5
5
36
--
Sulfate as SO.
(mg/D
38
26
25
475
--
Total Hardness
as CaCO^ (mg/1)
30
30
32
450
--
Total Organic
Carbon (TOC)
(mg/I)
13
13
13
180
--
Total Solids
(i«g/l )
110
89
83
1100
--
Tota1 Non-
VolaLile Solids
(mg/I)
45
38
42
200
--
Total Suspended
Solids (nig/1 )
56
26
31
260
--
Total VolaLile
Suspended Solids
(mg/1)
9
3
10
56
18
-------
Air quality monitoring conducted during May 1982 by the EPA revealed
that the air at the site contained the organic constituent methyl ethyl
ketone, but within safe breathing limits.
2.6 Past Studies
In 1971, Western Processing contracted with the consulting firm of
Bouillon, Christofferson, and Schairer to develop a pollution control
plan for the site. The plan recommended improvements in the processing
of Western Processing's waste stream and provided for spill control and
the collection of storm water that had previously run off-site. Due to
the cost associated with implementing these improvements, the majority
of the corrective measures were never carried out.
Western Processing, as a storage facility for hazardous waste ma-
terials under RCRA, must comply with the ISS requirements. The investi-
gation which the EPA is currently conducting will obtain data necessary
to evaluate past and present practices at the site. This investigation
includes the following activities:
a. Meetings with Federal, state, and local public health officials
to discuss environmental regulations.
b. File searches.
c. Detailed studies of aerial photos of the site dated from 1960
to 1980 to determine changes in site activities.
d. Installation of monitoring wells to determine the existence
and extent of surface and groundwater contamination.
e. Collection of surface water samples to determine the degree of
water quality degradation in the surrounding waterways.
f. Preparation of a report/reports describing the above activi-
ties .
012883
19
-------
The EPA investigation is in progress at the time of the writing of
this report. No other documentation of studies regarding Western
Processing has been found.
012S83
20
-------
3.0 GENERAL APPROACH TO SITE CLEANUP
3.1 Normal Approach
The- normal progression of project activities in response to a haz-
ardous waste release is shown on figure 8. The significant phases in
this progression are described below.
3.1.1 Discovery (Phase 1)
The discovery phase commences with the initial report of a release
or potential release and ends with start of the preliminary assessment
by the lead agency. In the case of Western Processing, this phase
occurred in March 1980 when the EPA initially took water samples from
Mill Creek.
3.1.2 Preliminary Assessment (Phase 2)
A preliminary assessment is primarily directed at determining, in
as short a time as possible, the nature and scope of the hazard and con-
cluding whether or not immediate removal actions are required. The
preliminary assessment may conclude that no release has occurred and
therefore terminate the response. In the case of Western Processing,
the contamination of water flowing in Mill Creek and in the railroad and
powerline right-of-way drainage ditches, as documented by sampling
efforts, and the potential for groundwater contamination, warranted
further local, state, and Federal actions.
3-1.3 Immediate Removal (Phase 3)
Immediate removal actions are accomplished when the lead agency
determines that such actions are required to prevent or mitigate immed-
iate and significant harm to human life or health or to the environment.
012883 21
-------
PHASE I
PHASE 2
I PHASE 3
PHASE »
PHASE 5
PHASE 6
PHASE 7
DISCOVERY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
IMMEDIATE REMOVAL
EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT
PLAMMED REMOVAL
REMEDIAL ACT I OK
COMMUNITY
RELATIONS PUN
FIGURE 9
DOCUMENTATION AND COST RECOVERY
PROJECT CLOSE-OUT
I 1
I OPTIONAL|
I ACTIVITY I
1 1 NORMAL PROJECT APPROACH
FIGURE 8
-------
Should the site owner/operator no longer manage the site, a significant
change in the conditions at the site could occur quickly. Rapid
deterioration of the condition of the site could necessitate an immediate
removal action. In the case of Western Processing, no immediate removal
actions have been performed by governmental agencies. The Compliance
Order issued by EPA Region X on June 4, 1982 itemized 28 violations of
the RCRA ISS requirements and the associated required responses which
included the following immediate removal actions:
1. Repair of damaged fencing and posting of additional unauthor-
ized access warning signs.
2. Transfer of any hazardous waste contained in corroded, deteri-
orated, leaking, bulging, punctured, or unstable drums into
drums in good condition.
3. Segregation of all incompatible materials.
No evidence of the required response was found on the subsequent
inspection for any of these three immediate removal actions. Following
the completion of any immediate removal actions, a site may require
additional cleanup work and depending on the nature and severity of the
remaining hazards, Phases 4 and 5 may be initiated either sequentially
or in parallel.
3.1.4 Evaluation and Assessment (Phase 4)
The purpose of this phase is to determine the appropriate action
when the preliminary assessment indicates the need for either planned
removal or remedial action and when the agencies involved in an immediate
removal action agree that further actions are required. In the case of
Western Processing, the State of Washington has assigned a high priority
to the cleaning up of this site and the EPA has placed Western Processing
012883 22
-------
on the Expanded Interim National Priority List of 160 sites. In
addition, the EPA has directed the preparation of this Remedial Action
Master Plan, which is detailed in Section 4.
3.1.5 Planned Removal (Phase 5)
Planned removal actions are undertaken when it can be concluded that
such actions offer a cost savings over remedial action, the actions will
mitigate the damage which might otherwise occur, and they are self-
contained (i.e., do not rely on future actions to maintain the mitigating
effects). In the case of Western Processing, no planned removal actions
have been undertaken.
3.1.6 Remedial Actions (Phase 6)
Remedial actions are those responses to situations which require
longer-term and possibly more expensive actions. The general approach
to Remedial Action is shown on Figure 9.
A remedial investigation is undertaken to determine the nature and
extent of the contamination. At Western Processing, the sampling efforts
conducted by the METRO, DOE, and EPA have documented to some degree the
nature and the extent of the contamination. Additional information will
be obtained from the current sampling efforts of the EPA. However, it
is expected that additional investigations will be needed to support the
Feasibility Study.
Remedial implementation measures fall into one of three categories:
1. Initial Remedial Measures are those whose purpose is to correct
or prevent an immediate and obvious hazard. They require
minimal investigative and study efforts and are consistent with
the longer-term remedial actions under consideration. In the
case of Western Processing, certain initial remedial measures
are felt to be justified. These are described in Section 4.3
and Appendix D.
012883 23
-------
rs
|SJ
COMMUNITY
RELATIONS PUN
REMEDIAL ACTION MASTER PUN
i
INITIAL REMEDIAL
MEASURES
FIGURE 8
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
<
FEASIBILITY STUDY
1
REMEDIAL DESIGN
1
IMPLEMENT SOURCE CONTROL
AND/OR OFFSITE MEASURES
1
PHASE 7,
FIGURE 8
REMEDIAL ACTION SEQUENCE
FIGURE 9
-------
2. Source Control Measures are intended to minimize or prevent
the migration of hazardous substances off-site. To be appro-
priate, the hazardous substances must still be at or near their
original location and the site must offer inadequate contain-
ment in its present or reasonably expected condition. Source
control measures require a higher level of investigative/studv
effort than initial remedial measures. Prior to implementa-
tion, they must be demonstrated to be" cost-effective and
consistent with the permanent site remedial action plan.
3. Off-site Measures are similar to source control measures in
that they must provide cost-effective and permanent solutions
to the problems presented by the situation. However, as their
name implies, off-site measures are appropriate in those
situations where contaminants have already migrated beyond the
site boundaries.
3.2 Fast-Track Approach
As shown on Figures 8 and 9, and described in the preceding para-
graphs, the normal project sequence involves problem identification,
evaluation, planning, design, implementation and close-out, with each
step following in order. In those situations where contamination from
an uncontrolled hazardous waste site is observed to pose a serious and
ongoing hazard to the public health or environment, and where there is
obviously a limited choice of feasible remedial alternatives, a fast-
track approach to site cleanup may be implemented. In light of the above
conditions, fast-tracking almost invariably addresses source control,
rather than off-site implementation measures. Although the fast-track
and normal project sequences are basically the same, in a fast-track
approach the remedial investigation and feasibility study are limited in
scope and combined into a single project in order to expedite the overall
process. Fast-tracking essentially affects only the time element of the
remedial process. Fast-track remedial implementation projects must, like
normal projects, be demonstrated as cost-effective and consistent with a
012883
24
-------
permanent site remedy. At Western Processing, current site conditions
are not considered serious enough to warrant a fast-track approach for
the site.
3.3 Community Relations Plan
Public participation is an integral feature of all Remedial Action
Master Plans. A Community Relations Plan (CRP) is intended to inform
and involve the public in the cleanup effort, so that final site remedial
measures are accepted by a consensus of affected parties.
012883
25
-------
4.0 REMEDIAL ACTION MASTER PLAN
4.1 Introduction
This section describes the Remedial Action Master Plan (RAMP) that
has been developed for the Western Processing site. The remedial
activities to be conducted at the Western Processing site have been
described 3t different levels of detail.
Initial Remedial Measures can commence at once, with no other
prerequisite actions. Two Initial Remedial Measures have been developed
for the Western Processing facility:
A. Implementation of a Community Relations Plan (Section 4.3.1)
B. Cleanup of spills on open ground (Section 4.3.2)
A project work statement and opinion of probable cost for the second
Initial Remedial Measure is provided in Appendix D.
A Remedial Investigation has been specified to supplement the infor-
mation obtained in the current EPA investigation in order to conduct the
Feasibility Study. For the Remedial Investigation and the Feasibility
Study, task descriptions and budget level cost estimates have been
provided. The Remedial Design, Implementation, and Post-Cleanup
Monitoring activities, which are based on the results of the Feasibility
Study, are described in lesser detail.
4.2 RAMP Schedule
The proposed remedial action schedule is shown on Figure 10. Due to
the EPA's ongoing RCRA action regarding this project, it was deemed
appropriate to avoid projections of start times for individual actions.
012883
26
-------
REMEDIAL ACTION SCHEDULE
TIME IN MONTHS AFTER START OF WORK
REMEDIAL ACTION PROJECTS
0
10
IS
20
25
30
I INITIAL REMEDIAL MEASURE
PREPARE WORK PLAN
PREPARE BID SPECIFICATION AND PROCURE-
MENT OF CLEANUP SERVICES CONTRACTOR
PERFORM CLEANUP AND REPORT
H REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
REVIEW EXISTING DATA AND DOCUMENTS
DEVELOP SITE WORK.SAFETY,AND
SAMPLING PLANS
CONDUCT SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSES
CONDUCT GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
PREPARE REPORTS
HI FEASIBILITY STUDY
DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES
EVALUATE THE ALTERNATIVES
PREPARE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
PREPARE FINAL REPORT
IY REMEDIAL DESIGN
Y IMPLEMENTATION
SI POST -CLEANUP MONITORING
M COMMUNITY RELATIONS
NOTE =
THIS SCHEDULE OMITS ANY PROJECTIONS
OF THE TIME REQUIRED FOR THE DOE
AND THE EPA TO REVIEW THE COMPLETED
AND PROPOSED WORK AND TO AUTHORIZE
THE NEXT TASK.
FIGURE
-------
Therefore, the schedule omits any projections of the time required for
the DOE and the EPA to review the completed and proposed work and to
authorize the next task.
4.3 Initial Remedial Measures
4.3.1 Community Relations Plan
The purpose of this project phase is to inform and involve the
public in the site clean up process, so that a substantial effective
agreement (consensus) on a course of action can be attained. The
development and implementation of the CRP will be the responsibility of
the EPA, with support of the DOE and the Contractor(s) for the various
remedial projects. The CRP will consist of two (2) phases:
o Plan development, culminating in a final CRP work plan, will
be completed within fifteen (15) days.
o Plan implementation will proceed concurrently and support the
overall site cleanup process, through final release of the
Western Processing site.
4.3.2 Cleanup of Spills on Open Ground
The purpose of this action is to alleviate any on-site hazard
without initiating significant study efforts. By accomplishing this
action, the past and present releases will be isolated from the environ-
ment. This action can be initiated immediately after the receipt of the
work assignment. A project work statement and opinion of probable cost
for this Initial Remedial Measure are provided in Appendix D. The
appendix information should be reviewed after the extent of on-site
spills has been determined. The optimum methods for the ultimate
disposal of the on-site materials will be developed during the
Feasibility Study.
012883 27
-------
4.4 Remedial Investigation
The purpose of this activity is to further determine the nature and
extent of contamination at the Western Processing site and to provide
the data required to develop and evaluate alternatives in the Feasibility
Study. Additional data will be required in at least one and possibly
two areas. Soil sampling will be conducted during the Remedial Investi-
gation in order to evaluate alternatives related to the disposal of
contaminated soil. Depending upon the adequacy of the results of the
current EPA study to define the existance and extent of groundwater
contamination, additional groundwater sampling may be necessary. Task
descriptions and a budget level cost estimate for the Remedial Investi-
gation are provided in Appendix E. The appendix information should be
reviewed after the completion of the EPA study.
4.5 Feasibility Study
A Feasibility Study is intended to develop and evaluate remedial
alternatives, recommend an appropriate cost-effective remedial
measure(s), and develop a conceptual design of the approved remedial
measure(s). Since the Western Processing site is active, it will have
to be determined whether remedial measure(s) will be developed which
assume an active or inactive site. The following areas will require
review during the Feasibility Study assuming the site will remain open:
1. Identification of contents of drums and tanks stored on-site.
2. Evaluation of disposal alternatives for contaminated soil.
3. Evaluation of alternatives for control of any movement of
contamination in groundwater or soil
012883
28
-------
4. Evaluation of all lagoon liners.
5. Provision of an environmental assessment of the various
alternatives presented.
6. Establishment of post-clean up monitoring requirements.
The following areas will require review during the Feasibility Study
assuming the site would be closed:
1. Evaluation of disposal or treatment alternatives for material
stored in drums and tanks.
2. Evaluation of disposal or treatment alternatives for material
stored in lagoons.
3. Evaluation of alternatives for control of any movement of
contamination in groundwater or soil.
4. Evaluation of either: (a) disposal alternatives for contami-
nated soil or (b) sealing or covering of the site with
uncontaminated soil.
5. Provision of an environmental assessment of the various
alternatives presented.
6. Establishment of post-clean up monitoring requirements.
The "no-action" alternative of not implementing remedial action will
also be evaluated. Task descriptions and a budget level cost estimate
for the Feasibility Study are provided in Appendix F. The appendix
information should be reviewed after the completion of the EPA study.
4.6 Remedial Design
The purpose of this activity is to complete the design of the
remedial action(s) recommended in the Feasibility Study and to prepare
complete contract documents. Until the Feasibility Study is complete it
012883 29
-------
is impossible to develop a detailed scope of work, schedule, and cost
estimate for the design activity. However, it is expected that a
remedial design could be completed within 180 days from notice .to
proceed.
4.7 Implementation
The purpose of this activity is to implement the remedial
measure(s) recommended by the Feasibility Study, in accordance with the
provisions of the contract documents prepared during the Remedial Design
activity. It is not possible to develop a detailed scope of work,
schedule, and cost estimate until after the Remedial Design effort is
complete. Implementation of the remedial measure(s) is expected to
require approximately 60 to 180 days.
4.8 Post-Cleanup Monitoring
The purpose of this activity is to establish a permanent environ-
mental monitoring program for implementation after completion of the
cleanup effort. The scope, schedule, and cost of this program are
dependent on the results of the Remedial Investigation and the type of
remedial measure(s) recommended by the Feasibility Study.
012883
30
-------
REFERENCES
In addition to the files at the EPA Region X, the following specific
documents were reviewed during the preparation of this RAMP.
Ecology and Environment, Inc., ''Field Investigation of Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites," FIT Project, TDD No. 10-8203-04, May, 1982.
United States Geological Survey, "Geology and Ground-Water Resources of
Southwestern King County, Washington," 1969.
United St3tes Geological Survey, "Water Resources of King County,
Washington," 1968.
012883
31
-------
APPENDIX A
On-Site Drum Storage
-------
APPENDIX A
ON-SITE DRUM STORAGE
The following is a partial list of drums stored on the Western
Processing site. Data was obtained from the RCRA inspections described
in Section 2.4.
Approximate Number
of Drums
68
19
260
150
22
360
I-10
10
236
300
Drums in Deficient
Condition
corroded-3
corroded-2; smoking-1;
crushed & spilling-1
leaking-1
leaking-5
leaking-1
corroded-3
leaking-1; corroded
leaking-1; holes-2
corroded
Contents as Indicated
on Labels
Acetone, methyl ethyl
ketone
oleum
isopropyl alcohol,
dimethyl acetamide
Seattle Times ink
Seattle Times ink
gear grease
thinner
TRIKE"
methyl ethyl ketone,
liquid NOS, sodium
hydroxide, sulfuric
acid
C/D
liquid NOS, acid
corrosives
hard isol, H_0, oil,
H3P04, poly, MT
acetone
012883
A-l
-------
Approximate Number Drums in Deficient
of Drums Condition
Contents as Indicated
on Labels
bulging-1; leaking-2;
corroded
leaking-1; holes-1;
corroded
leaking-1
10
leaking-1
corroded
corroded-1; leaking-1;
bulging-1
leaking-2; bulging-7;
corroded
bulging-1; leaking-1
200-250 leaking-7; bulging-4;
holes-1
12 open-1
leaking-3
leaking-2; holes-1
bulging-1
smoking
012883 A-2
chlorinated solvents
thinner
NH.0H, formaldehyde,
hydrofluoric acid,
Pb, H,CrO H SO
hno3 *" 3 '
thinner
oleum
acetone
perchloroethylene
acetone
acetone
chlorinated solvents
TR1"
methanol, xylene,
methylene chloride,
methyl ethyl ketone,
toluene, acetone,
isopropyl alcohol
zinc ash
chlorinated solvents
chlorinated solvents,
oily wastes
oleum
TRIKE*
-------
Approximate Number Drums in Deficient
of Drums Condition
Contents as Indicated
on Labels
30-40
24
holes-1; leaking-3
leaking-1
leaking-1
corroded
chlorinated solvents,
freon, liquid phenol
formaldehyde resin, gasoline,
oils
HF, LF, water, "clean
meth clor"
garbage, hard D salt
Velva Mag
1,1,1, TR1"
methyl ethyl ketone
CI mix
"Possibly a site identification for trichloroethylene or
trichloroethane.
012883
A-3
-------
APPENDIX B
Sampling Results
March 1980
-------
V«/t:ia : 1 1 tCHNlCAL bcRVl'
INC.
INDUS 1 luOH'i
SAMP
LE 1!) J0008 Heceivina Vv'a!
e r
SA.M 1'
LE ID J000S
LA 15
ID ¦ 19173V3
LAP
!!) i 91 7%: 44
DATE
INJECTED 4/2/SO
DATE
EXTRACTED 2/25/80
C'D
!D i9'73V1
DATE
INJECTED 4/3/80
CGNC
. FACTOR
STD
ID 141
CONC
. FACTOR 100
V o 1 n i
0\.'
; 1 "5,
acrolein
u q /1
ND
Pesticides
89P aldrin
uj/l
ND
3 V
acrvlomtrile
NO
9CP
d. lelcrm
ND
L V
benzene
ND
9 IP
chlordane
ND
6 V
carbon tetrachloride
ND
92P
/M4'-DDT
r; i j
7V
chlorcbenzene
ND
53P
4 , A ' - D D F.
N D
10 V
1. 2-dichlorcethane
ND
9AP
L.L' -DDD
n c
11V
1,1.1-trichioreethane
ND
95P
alDha-endosulfar.
| 1 i !
13V
1,l-dich'ioroethane
ND
96P
beta-endosulfa n
N P1
UV
1.1, 2-tnchlorgethane
ND
97P
endosulfan sulfate
N n
1 5 V
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
ND
9SP
endrin
ND
16 V
chloroethane
ND
gop
endrir. aldehvde
ND
17V
bis(chloromethyl ) ether
ND
100P
heptach lor
K I N
x xjw/hxssooi: Kxlwxwt y
v y ty'PY X
101 P
nrnlachior epoxide
f-s D
23 V
chloroform
ND
102P
alDha-BHC
'¦i n
2Q\/
i,l-dichloroethvlene
ND
103P
beta-B!!C
» i • ^
30 V
1 ,2-trans-dichioroethylene
ND
10IP
qa mrr.a-DHC
ND
32 V
1. 2-dichlorcpropn ne
ND
105 P
delta-BilC
ND
33 V
1,3-dichlcrcore jylcne
ND
106 P
PGR-12i 2
ND
3SV
eihv 1 benzene
ND
107 P
ND
/ > v
methvlene chloride
10SP
PCB-1221
N D
i5V
methvl chloride
ND
109P
PCB-1232
ND
ibV
meihvl bromide
ND
HOP
PCB-124S
p'
wV
bromoform
ND
111P
PCB-1260
' - D
£SV
dichlorobrotnonietha ne
ND
112P
PC P.-1016
ND
£Q\I
t richlorofluorometha ne
ND
113P
toxa phone
N D
50V
die hi o r od i fluorome thane
ND
51V
chlorodibromenietha ne
ND
Less than 10 ug/1
65 V
t e t r a c h lo r oe t h v 1 e n e
ND
(pesticides less than 5 ug/1)
S6V
toluene
ND
ND =
Not de tec ted
87 V
trichloroethvlene
ND
-, v _
Not confirmed by GC.Mb
8SV
vinvl chloride
ND
-------
(./c-, 1 tLhiNJILAu lJtrtV 1
~ nv«L.
INUUb i in. ... i
c >< r
'LB ;D J00C3 Receivinc
Water 1225
SAMPLE ID J0008
LAD
ID . 19173A2
LAB
ID 1 9173B°
r-\ ' 'r' z
U i \ 1
: EXTRACTED 3/27/80
DATE
EXTRACTED V2h/fi0
DATE
: INJECTED 4/26/80
DATE
INJECTED 5/1/SO
STD
ID PHENOL 2U
STD :
ID DFTPP1 01 5 ENSTD1 9Z;
CCNC
: FACTOR 1000
CONC
FACTOR 1000
Acid
Compounds
uo/l
Base/Neutral Compounds
U q ¦' 1
o ¦
2. L . b-tr ichloroohenoi
ND
£1B
^-bromoD'ner.vl phenyl ether
22A
D-chloro-rr.-cresol
ND
£2B
bis(2-chloroi sooroDvl) ether
ND
2-chloroohencl
ND
43B
bis ( 2-chiorcethoxy 1 rr.eihar,
C i ' 'i
51A
2, £-d ich toronhenol
ND
52B
hexachIcrobutadiene
M f,
^ i •
2 . L-cimethvlnhenol
ND
53 B
hexachlorocyclooentadiene
m n
57 A
2-miroDhenol
ND
5iB
isoDhorone
n
5£a
Z-ni troDhenol
ND
553
naphthalene
*; r •,
59 A
2, i-dinitrcnhenol
ND
56 B
nitrobenzene
KD
60 A
L, 6-dim tro-o-cresol
ND
61B
N-n 11 rosodimethvia mine
N1)
6 L.\
DeniachloroDhenol
ND
62B
N-n it rosod i nhen via mi ne
ND
6 ¦" A
nnenol
ND
63 B
N-n it rosod i-n-pron v ! a in me
N D
66B
bis (2-etlivlhexvl) phihnlat
t1 !-
Base
/Neutral Compounds
67B
butvl benzyl phthabite
I-. P;
6SB
dL-n-butvl phthalate
i:o
I B
acennphi bene
ND
69 B
di-n-octvl ohtha late
N r.
5!3
benzidine
ND
70B
d l e t h v 1 phthalate
N' '
SB
1,2,i-irich lorobenzene
ND
71B
dimethvl Dhtlialate
NO
9B
bexnc'nlorobenzene
ND
72B
benzo(a) anthracene
NO
i 2 B
h ex achloroe thane
ND
73 B
oenzot .i ) p vfone
NO
1 SB
b i s ( 2-c h 1 oroe t h v P e t h e r
ND
7/.B
3.i-benzofluoranthene
ND
20 B
2-c n 1 c ron a n t h a 1 en e
ND
75B
benzo(k)fluoranthene
N D
o r~ r»
tj !i
I . 2-dich!orobenzene
ND
76 B
chrvsene
M [ i
26 B
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
ND
77B
acenanhthvlene
NO
27 B
i . £-dichlorobenzene
ND
7SB
a n 111 r ;> c e n e
ND
C n
o
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
ND
79B
benzo(o h i)nrrvlone
NO
33 n
2,--dinitrotoluene
ND
SOB
fl ucrene
.'•ID
26 B
2,6-di n Urotoluene
ND
Si B
phenant'nrene
:. p,
57 3
1, 2-diphenyl hydrazine
82B
d ibenzoi a,h ianlhracene
Mf,
(as azobenzene)
ND
S3B
mdeno (1 , 2, 3-cd ) pv rone
N !"i
39 B
fl uora n thene
ND
8iB
n v ren e
MO
/ o ;*>
i. L' Lj
L-z h: o roD he n y1 n h e n v 1
ether ND
12 9 B
2 , 3 , 7. S-ielracii iorodihenzc-
D-dioxin '"-D
-------
EPA-
¦ywu
ID LABORATORY
¦ I-: J 01-; I
i-HB no __
POLLUTFINTS 12-^1 in REPORT
0.15 K>->i oJ,oo\;q vj.P.
i-iij_l. i n : i iri i 1.21-
; 1 or- r no
umt/riiic
< UG. L >
010.1." Z-J>- RNTIHONY S -/
01002 __3 rfsenic p ' >
0101.2 CL-.3-C- CERYLLIUII j'-'t'7!-'
01027 rj_T__ com hum
OlOi-i '^r_ ciiruiiiuii
0J 012 1, COPPER
01051 ¥-L\ LEFiO
71900 Cj=CJ. mercury
ojo-:r 2-^r- nici.ei
01.117 3v ienl
E IIIER
B 1 S ( 2 - CI ILOROETMO: "i") IIETI101 IE
t lEXnCI ILCRODUTfiL-1 E(IE
MEX.nCl ILOROCVCLOPEM IFtD I EIIE
ISOFHOPOIIE
NFiPHrMOLEME
NI IROBEHZEME
N-NI TRO iOD 11 IETI IVLFll 11 NE
N-N I TP0 500 I -N-F l\OF VLFll 11 NE
N-N II F;03ul' I Pt IENVL ni 11 NE
0 I 3 ( 2-E TI r.'Ll lEX'r'L > T11 N inLOTL
fJ-EUf.'L E.:ENZVI. Fllll IHL H TF.
bl-N-EUPrl. PUINIlLfllE
t' I -N-OC I'iL PIINIflLrUE
L» I ETHYL F tl 11 Ifll fl IE
DIIIE1HYL riiriinLfHE
EEN20«:n)nrj tuft ilene
DENZOCrOPYRENE
GEN20'. II LUOPhII Tl ICIIE
PENZOCk j FLUOF.IHI 11 If tie
LIIRYSENl
ni'.EririPiinr.'LCNE
iiriiiii-ncEMF.
LENZO '01
fi. iiuFcni:
I I IF HI IN 11 II-
J . 2. 5. <5-1
mr i t;n. i'
F iH HE
H.l L'
i) rEPYi.FNi:
i:ni:
Ihl.NZMNllirnr 1
: . - i I • > I II III.
ML
> I BY
SOLIDS
oh i r-
RCIU EX I Fill. TITLES < UG. L. )
3162 L
3M"52
21556
31601
3 1606
31591
31 CI 6
31616
31657
39032
31691
2. I • 6-TF. ICIILOF OniilllJl.
1--CHL0FU-II-CFE3OL
2-rilL0F'.il"Hi:N0L
2- 1 -C11 '-ML0I- OF IIENL-L
2. 1-011'E IIIYLT 1 ItNC'L
2-N I Il ul-'HEMOL
1-NI IF i ii IIEIJOL
2, 1-CINI 1R0PIIEN0L
1, 6-DINI TPO-O- CFES'lL
rLlllllCIILORun ILNOL
MILNriL
VOLOTILE ORGRNIC:
UG. L )
31210
31215
31030
32102
31301
32103
31506
31 196
3 1511
31516
31311
32106
31501
31516
31511
3170 I
31699
3 1371
31 123
3-1-113
31113
3210 1
32 J 01
3 1 130
3 ¦¦¦}
t " lii--.
.(¦I I ¦ 5
• t . •
RCPOLEIN
nCRYLONITPILE
FJENZENE
CfiFfcON TETI-'OCHLORIOC
CHLOROOENZl NE
1. 2-DICIILOPOE rURNE
1. 1., 1-11-.'I CI ILOF.LiE 11IONE
1. 1-DICIILOPuETIIONE
I, 1. 2-1 R I CHI .OROE 11 IONE
1,1,2,2- Ttl F OCI IL0P0E11 IFiNE
chloroe i unni:
lhlopoporii
J, 1-0 ICHl.0P0E7IIYl.tr IE
J. 2 - TPf IN3-0 I CI ILOPOE 11 lYLENE
1, 2-DICHLOROPROrfiNE
CIS- 1, 3-D I CI ILOROP ROPENE
TF0N5-1, 3-D1CIIL0F.0PF0FENE
E7I I'.'LE ENZEHL
I IE 111'i'LENE CIILGFMTE
IIE1HYL CIILrn IC-E
IIEJHYL EJRulllDE
OI-'OMOFOPII
CROI100 I CI ILUF 01 IE 11 IHf IC
1 P I CI ILORi.iFLI IOROI IE 11 Ii "if Jl"
D I CI ILOROl ¦ I rLOlJI-.OI IE II " INC
L-1 CRONI ii III HI-'TIME 11 Ii )r It
.. ii: rr-iiLni (n-ui. rir.'LCNi
,A! I ¦:_! If.IIL
_ J_ 11. O.IILul I II III |'I L tll.
VINYL ClllW-H'i:
i; I i I uj -l oi :i" 111 .'L >
2-1-1ILOKI 'L I ll'.'L VIIIVI
1 IIIEI-.
Line R
-------
^ iNt— iiNJUu-j i ri
f- \ \ 1
im
P L1Z iD J0007 Receivinq Water
SAMP
EE ID J0007
i • n
L/\ i)
ID 1 9i 73V2
LAB
ID 19173-1^3
Tj ,i T
E INJECTED A/2/90
d vie
EXTRACTED 3/25/30
ST!)
ID 19173V1
DATE
INJECTED k!3/60
C0.\'<
2. FACTOR
STD :
ID 1 L 1
CONC
. FACTOR 1000
Vol a
l i 1 0 ?
utj/1
Pesticides
ue/1
2 V
acrolein
ND
89P
a 1 d r i n
v- '.s
i * u
I
acrvlenitrile
ND
9 OP
dieldrin
f \]
benzene
ND
91 P
chlordane
cV
carbon tetrachloride
ND
92P
L,L'~DDT
7 V
chlorobenzene
ND
93P
4,4' -DDE
ND
1 ov
1 ,2-cichloroethane
ND
9L?
L, L '-DDD
i-: rj
11V
1,1. 1-t rich loroe thane
95 P
alDha-endosulfan
nd
13V
1,1-dichloroethane
ND
96P
beta-endosulfan
N 0
UY
1,1. 2-rnchloroethane
ND
97P
endosulfan sulfate
f: o
i ~iY
1
1,1.2,2-tetrachloroethane
ND
98 P
endrin
16 V
chlcrce thane
ND
99 p
endrin aldehyde
ND
17V
bis (chloroinethy] ) ether
ND
100P
11 e o t a c h 1 o r
NO
X'Xa X >£wkX0C3OC;C XyM-\ >3 .vi X'Mtf X?X X X X X X X X X
101P
heorachlor epoxide
N i)
23 V
chloroform
37
102P
a 1 u ha-BI iC
N D
29 V
1 . 1 -ci ich loroel h vl ene
ND
103P
beta-BHC
N!)
30V
1.2-trans-dichloroethylene
23
10^P
5 a m m a - B110
I'j
32 V
1,2-d ichlorooropa ne
ND
105P
delta-BHC
ND
33 V
1.3-dichiorooropylene
ND
106P
PCB-1 2£2
ND
3SV
e' hvlbenzene
ND
107P
PC H-l 2"~/.
ND
IiV
uiethvlene chloride
1 S
10SP
PCB-1221
MO
i'jV
methyl chloride
ND
109P
PCB-1232
MO
— 0
rnethvl bromide
ND
hop
PCB-12AS
NL'
4 7V
bromofonn
ND
i i ip
PCB-1260
M'
:sv
d i c hi 1 o r o b r o mo rr.e thane
ND
112P
l'CB-1016
MD
/c,y
t r ichlorof 1 uoronie L h a ne
ND
113P
loxanhcn e
N[i
50 V
d i c h lorod if 1 uoronie ilia ne
ND
_
51V
chlorod tbromc.mol ha ne
ND
—
Less than 10 ug/1
cr V
tetrachlcrcethvieno
(p
est 1 cides iess than 5 u^/1)
86 V
toluene
ND -
Not detected
S 7 V
tricMoroetiivlene
22
v —
Not confirmed by GCMS
^ 0 \;
L' »
vmvl chloride
*
-------
Wc^ . I I fcCHNlLAL btKV1 >_ = iNC. iNUUbl K„ v.uUKV
SAMPLE ID -J0007 Receiving Water 196th Sfc\,-\MPLE ID J0007 Ditch Below V.VbU'-n
L A 3
ID . 19172A1
LAB
ID 1 917301
D A T
E EXTRACTED 3/27/80
DATE
EXTRACTED 2/26/SO
DAT
E INJECTED 4/16/80
DATE
INJECTED 5/1 /SO
STD
ID PHENOL 214
STD ;
ID DFTPP1015 3NST194
CON
C FACTOR 1000
CONC
FACTOR 1000
A c 11
! Compounds
u c >' 1
Base/Neutral Compounds u
c /1
^ 1 >
^ i i\
2 . L , 6-i rich, lcronhcnol
ND
Z.1 B
¦i-brcnionhenvl phenyl ether
NO
2 2 A
D-chlcro-m-cresol
rj d
Zi2 B
bis(2-chlcroiscDroDvl) ether
ND
2l A
2-chicrov>henoI
ND
bis 12-chlcrcelhoxv 1 me'/nur.e
1 M
31A
2.4-aichiorophenol
ND
5 2 B
hexac'nlorobutadiene
' * 1 i
^ ' A
2, i-dimethvlphenol
ND
53 B
h ex a c h1o roc v c1o o e n t a d i e n e
ND
57 A
2-nitroDhenol
ND
5^B
isophorone
: ¦ n
58 A
i-n • troDhenol
14
553
naphthalene
r;o
59 A
2, 4-di ni rroohenol
ND
56 B
ni Irobenzene
ho
oOA
L ,6-dinitro-o-presol
ND
61 B
N-mtrosodimeihvla rr.ine
f.j n
6: a
d e n ta c hlo roDn e no I
ND
62B
N-m t rosodi ohen vl a mi ne
N| Q
6 5 A
phenol
ND
63 B
N-nitrosodi-n-nronv 1 a mine
rj r-,
66 D
bis ( 2-ei h.vI'ne ay 1) nliih.ilaio
Ba S'
e/Neutral Compounds
67 B
butyl benzvi ohrhalato
•:n
68 B
di-n-butvl phthalate
IB
acennphihene
ND
69 B
di-n-ccivl phthalate
53
benzidine
ND
70 B
d i eihv1 p h t ha late
i ' >
SB
1,2, i-irichlorobenzene
ND
7113
dimethvl phthalate
NP
OB
li ex a c n 1 oroben zen e
ND
72B
benzoln) anthracene
N n
12 3
hexachloroethane
ND
73 B
benzoi a ' p -,'i'cne
r.n
18B
bis(2-chloroe thy1)ether
ND
ILK
3, 4-benzofluoranthene
t-O
20B
2-c h I o r o n a d t h a le n e
ND
75B
benzo(k)flucranthene
fin
or> B
1,2-d icblorobenzene
ND
76 B
chrysene
n n
2o B
1,3-dichiorobenzene
ND
77B
ncenanluh vlene
!>!¦"!
27 B
1,^-dicnlorobenzene
ND
7SB
a nthracene
ND
28 B
3,3'-dichiorobenzidine
ND
79B
benzol r,h i ) pervlene
n p
353
2,i-d i niirotolucnc
ND
80 B
fUisprene
N!!
36 B
2,6-din i Crete! uene
ND
81 B
phena nthrene
: ¦ p
373
1, 2-diphenylhydrazine
82B
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
ND
(as azobenzene)
ND
83 B
i n d eno' 1 . 2,3-c d ) n v r e r, e
V <
39 B
f! uoranthere
ND
S/B
pvrene
Nn
Z.0 ¦ j
L -c h 1 o ro n h e n v 1 pi", o n v 1
eLhor ND
129B
2, 3, 7 , 8-tel racli iorod ibenzo-
p-d 10 x l n N'i
-------
EPA' 11 ON TO* LABORATORY
£
i i • j ii--i i i1.' i~oi_i_i_j rnu rs r>n rri riepurt
loh no , '/¦¦>'> STni ion riniiE
sioiu:i tjo sim ion Locrniou iL'4J/^y
.j" l/jtr/Xf) (
ruiE/rniE /_ *•. plow
\^Q\ouO Ol I icj1 SI ¦ hy'icjs)™
I I Ii.1.- Ill: I II I I I-..I-:
nnriLYi. i s cv ¦
on i l
sol i os-
IIC IIII. S
Rnsc/rii£UTF-riL EXTRnc ulh.es
ncio e:; n-roubles
0 1.097*
0 J COS
0L0L2
IOJ 027
J 01 Oj I
("1)0-12
U1051
7 J f-ujft
nj 067
o i J -i r
ruorr
010 59
7010.-1-'
O-ZcT
/ ? —
...11..
.(('iSCELl.niJEOUS
' •y" /»
.~finrzn
32730
——: —
nnr ii'ioiiv
flPSENIC
BERYLLIUM
cnr.niun
CI li-.OI HUM
i.of-r er
LEflO
I'lERCURV
III CI'EL
selemiuii
SILVER
THflLLIUII
zinc
(U'J.'L)
CVPINIOE
PIILWJLICS
¦ft-il :£^T-95-
c-/CS>
/'/-«'•'
FEST1CIOES (IJQ,-L>
39330 fll.OR I N
39350 CMLtifjDniJE
3937 0 OIELORIN
33300 'I, '1 oot
393.711 .i.-rrtE
j)!l" 4,4 £'C0
3i?-:i nLrnii enoosui eon
3-I or: m i.Noosi.iLniN
3-1" SL ENOOSULI fill SULrniE
39390 ENOFIN
3-1360 FN!'PIN ilLPFII'iT'E
:¦ I I ' > . Ill I' 11 ir III III
j'.'-i." iii i iiu.iii ui- i i i_i;:ii,l
31205
3 3120
3'1551
39700
34396
34273
3-1531
3' 1536
34 566
34571
3-1631
3-1(511
34626
34346
3-1376
346-11
34636
31283
31273
39702
34385
3-II03
34696
3-M-l 7
34 4 38
34429
3-I-I 53
39J uQ
34292
331 U)
3-15 >;
3-1 iiO
313 1 L
345:26
3 1217
t-1 - 'it
3 I..' I.'
fiCENnPIIIMENE
BENZIDINE
1, 2. -I-IPICIILGROCENZLNC
i ie: :nu iluf obenzene
HE::nciii.oi:oEiiinHE
B I S < 2- CI ILOROE 11IVL > ETIIER
2-ci il ORi.innr uti ini.EtiE
1, 2~L>I CI ILUROEENZEI IE
1, 3-0 11.1ILOFOP-ENZLNE
1, 4-DICIILUROI3ENZENE
3/ 3-DICIILOROBENZIOINE
2, -I-D INI TF.OTULUElIE
2. 6-0 I M I TRfJ I QLUENE
1, 2-0 I Fl IENYLI I'.'ORflZ I NE
FLUORHN ft IENE
¦I-CI ILGPOFI lEN'.'L PHENYL ETHER
4-BROI IOPIIENYL PI IFN'i'l. ETHER
BISCS-LHI OFniSOl Frif VL >ETHER
BIS<2-i:HL0R0ETtl0:;-,-> IIE1IIPINE
i lExnci ilcrodu rnu i ene
HEXftCHLGROCYCLOFENinDlENE
isornoRouE
nopmtholeme
N11RQBENZENE
N-N I TR050L' IIIE11 IVLni 11 NE
N-N 11 FOSOC' 1 -N-FROr YLHI11 (IE
N-N I TPOSC O I F/ IEN'i'Lni 11 NE
U ISC2-E r11'i'LtIEXYL > K1111IRLHT E
N-EUTVl. PENZYL Fl I ft 101.11 TE
0 i -N-DU r*. l pninriLniE
01 -n-oi; ivl riiiiiiii.niE
METHYL I'11111111.11 IE
0 I NE 11I'i'L l-'ll 11 If iLfl I E
rjENZQ < in mi riipni;ENE
ornzricn ^-",-pi.hi:
in N. i!• n -M iiiii-ihiiiii iii
l;l:N.'0' I, ll I I.HH--I Kill II (II
l'?Z-l
1-152
I53t
1 »30 L
I'T-OC
1591
16 16
3-1616
31657
3 903 2
3-1631
2. -I. G-TI-.-ICIILOI-OrilliNOL
F-CI ILOPU-lt- CPE50L
2-CI ILC'I- OFIIENUL
2. -I-OICI'LOI-OPHENUL
2, •l-OIIitnr.'LPITLNOL
2-NI IT i 'I IIENUL
-I -141 IPO' IIEN0L
2, 4-OINnFfiFHENOL.
-I. 6-omi if-n -n-CPESoL
FCN IULIIL0RHI IIEN'JL
PI IENi'iL
VOLnTlLE OPGPlNICS (UG, L;
3-1210
34215
3-1031)
32102
34301
32103
3 1506
34496
3-1511
3451 6
34 311
32106
3-150 L
345 16
3 15 11
3-170 I
3-1699
34371
i-l i;.* 1
i I 11: c
nCFOLEIN
nCRVLONITRlLE
BENZENE
CPlFBuN TElHtCHLORlOE
CIILORUEENZENE
1,2-OICHLOPHETHnNE
1. 1. 1-TR I CI II.C'P'OE I HilNE
1. 1-DICHLOroEIIinNE
1,1. 2-1 P I CI II .MROE 11IIINE
1, 1. 2, 2-rEIRnCIILUI::CiE1llliNE
ci iloroe ii inm;
CHLOFOFOril
J . 1 - L) 1 CI ll.nr.i lETH'.'LENE
1, 2- I RUNS- l» I CIIL.OKOl. rilYt.EtlE
i. 2-o ili ii.oi i if KOi niii;
cis-i, 3-o i ci ii oi-.i ir pen ene
I RflNS —J , 3-0 I CI ILUROI FurENE
FIII'T'l.nCNZENi:
III 111'.'l IIII Ml) <'l:H-|-
III IHVI. i HI in II I.
j 0
IUJ'Mm
CI IL
5
UIKVSLriL
3» 113
IILIHVL L'KUl! 11 -L
ZZ'Z ~ C-
ueTn
C:llf.
3 1 t'l-iO
ntjinfu nnr.ixfJC
3clO 1
i:,r-.Mi lorurn
Giifiim
PMC
hnmr-mENE
321UL
CIVOI Ii ID 11; 1 ll.OI* Ul It lllilf IL"
DEL in
L I (C
3 r,ZL
Sf?riZ:0 '(.ill I; PEPVLCNH
31133
TRICHLOI-'OrLUORUME fHHNi:
"IU :nf
i
I'irn
KLUor.F.nr.
3-1 *i»:ri
DICIII.OPUDin iJUIUjMEllir'NF-
rco
101 6
i i i-;t
rncMnmin- khe:
j
L-1 CKI H lOLlllJ IKUI III Tl nir II"
1
r '. f<
I L
* 1 * ~ *r-
L, 2, f?- -Dtrt»J~iVMIirr(ri;nK
• i 11
_ rL U-NH.Ml.r.u--OL 1 H'.'LLr:i.
I?-H'cJ
rr.t
\ jj
:iii.u
Ir;c hrin- i. ~ < -i i - -r ym:ui:
- t.-; ,i
. - —sa 1 '-'Lucni:
11* r
rL:
1 12
i 1 \trs
V i'1-r.fit
¦ -1 \
_ . ~ II- 11; ML OF- oi- I MVU-Tik
r«.r;
1 ^ 13
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
in
in
:< fl.-
'I '.
VIIIVL CMlVir-IDE
"j -y »
3
M. {,
r i. o
1 '
i »
i.Mi_o!:or k: 11 i t't. • r. n v
c--liil'-'Kml :hvl 'Vihvl liml
-------
APPENDIX C
Sampling Results
May 1982
-------
tJator (IdU*
Table I
Western Processing Vicinity Survey
S (it I iot.
'I
lab Number
Halt' Sampled
1 ime Sampled
est. stream flovi
8A
'surface
water)
20f
27 i
5/2'
m
15
10
, j
V
f s'
P«ii jinL't ers
B/M (i jl'ioii.
Ateiui'li thcue
I soj'hoi Gae
Uj|' (lu 1 L'MC
His hexyl) plithaljte
I) i - it - buty I phtha 1 a te
U i-n -oc t y I plithj ld tc
/\c i»l I» Ji I ion*
,4 il ithluro(ilit'H tdC h I % (Jnoi't.i Cmijj .ipfi f
0. 1 HI
l»U
J
!| fi|i I; 7A
i(well point) (surface
I.
water)
200^9 ;
/20./82
IS: 40
32<
11.004
n.nn/
2fil
5/20/82
fO.
6.
! I
I I
22!
35
I !
L
' 1 hi
J3
In,
l'J
70
fiA
well point) (surface
1 water)
III".
20(121 .
5/2'VP2
15:00
,31
' J
n.ota
i
l:r'
i ¦ T
I i I
2002J|
5/20/04
,2f!
3,3/ .Cfk
a,!
\\
1 I
| im
! n.r
i 1.7
V,1
I in
3(.
In
M
i 7
GB 3A '
well point) (surface
wa ter)
2001'
i/201/
12
!*
30
i
57
, o n&ii
'5
i
\ _
,4
i 1
-r I I
o.boi'
n.002
1 • ¦ 1 1
j 20056 ,
f>/2l/92
jl2: 2b 1
I-
! !
I
4.
1
0.002
t
¦,s n(110< 1l.i'.li ( I >n (lie t.illo liulir.Ui", licit ilc.li-i L7"l. ¦
,ouHi 01' lli-^lci!! 1 11 c 1 mii'i |iru| , t y . |< 11 i.I'M) suliU. tiri.
01lit"i" iii^diitcs an.11 v/i-,l Iiy ni/l"S linlcib nou-ilj | I , ! I
! .
I 1 in
in
1 i'l
I 51
t
i
.15
I in
_1ll
3U 1
(well point)(surface
water)
2(io^ j
5/21
11:
I
/f)Z
15!
I i
t 1
1 r~
¦ 1
5.
1.
I • 1
! !
I I
101
I :
til lit 11 ClU k.
Ill I i
200
$/20fU2
10: 15
J .'5
1
i
1 H
!!"
cfs
Ilh I
t;
10
~^To
(surface
wa ter)
'OO^Kl !
12 :
-------
U.itei Data
Table I (coul.)
UiisUTn Process in>j Vicinity Survey - May 20-21, 1911?
SI jI inn t
Voljtiles. (cont.)
I ritliloi of luoroiiiethane
leliMcliloroctliyleiie
Tol 'jcne
II icli Uiroliiyleiif
fiI ic lilcS .
1.1" t'MT
4.-1' Ollf
Mi-t.il'.
1 Ml a l ,'iiissol vcl
i
RA
r i)
i
l!lj
I-
)
7A
• I
h.
i
4 t !
i'
i.
r o
78
I"/
06
6<\
2.6l
i v :
I - iin
. . i . i
i 35
CH
:ii
1 I
' 1'
1'
3A
1)
3
In)
44
J I)
I-
-II
10
lji
! i
i I
i ,
A i entile
lid y ] I 11mi
Cdllltl I 1(111
('III fun i mil
lQ|>ficr
I ri.I
y
!ll> It I
S»- U-ii 1 u»n
j I I Vfl
/ I n«
tbul
(in)
(so)
(SO)
(?)
(10)
(So)
4
20
I/J3
vlr.o
111
||)0.
4^0
I
¦ ('
1
Vi
'li
)
¦0 '
15
0.
in
i 1
it n
z
!
i ji
147
/Of]
H f>
i«/,:
i
21
J
I
7.1
?h\
4*d'I
23
'l.
116
4 •
0 J
? .1
1'lll'llx lit",
Cy i II t dr •
I»t1 (uti I I '. )
Omi' .11 I I v 11 y {it inli')*,)
A
'Of i ill iii-: w.i l ri
11,'
. jlnt-i ill n rK i'
I.
<11
111
111)
Ji:1
1*5
21
0 3
2t)l
IK)
. f,
't|
ill'
• 4
I -
'3-1
?9
I .
I 1
' 4
20?
171 1
3'ji
0.
24
lit
1 6
111
' :2l
.'114
-------
Se»lurc-nt Pala'
Table II
Uestein I'rocess imj Vicinity Survey - Mjy 20 21, 19112
5 '.d I 11)11 '
Idli fliimiier
Ddtu Sd.ll|. U'd
lime Sanij.leJ
I'd i c*llltr I L-l "i
I)/N I rac 11 on:
Ai_enj|'hUn;iie
I lunraiulieiie
N (L'-olliyl he*y 1) plillulate
li"ii/o (.1) dill In iHt'iie/C liryscni.'
Ili.n.'u (a) |>yrene - (estimate)
1,1 lit-n^uflui ndiUliL'iie | .
Den/o (k) f )uc»riintlii;ni\ /or
/1(.cii.i|iMliyli:iie
Anlhi t<"l .
1
7A
II 20n|4' I
|/20'82|
14l5 i
• !
3
j
6A
:/2'VW
3 A
12-45
i'l!
.. i.
23cili i' liii |d (liiv/ir. Iji I-J'1 tlut i;., ".lati
I iI i 111 < ¦ i ill d I iki 11 ij , dirl 'j III Mill I'l f i < mi
[,.• i .ill- |li .110.
I
'US
200^2 |
>/2lj't)2
11: U '
27
id
99.000
,7G,0uo
?b4zo!
5/2(
12
13(
2?
6fil
l?f.OO() i
000/22,000 ll?(.
/82
301
,0!
000
rmo
III fn'O
un.cino
2li)C
I2H0
|0(,o
ll'i
>, r'.
/ ,2i|o
]|'K
] "
34.1
moi;
no
?2(j
t jiml
!i
20mj)|
b/?n[/U2
1?:
12.
20,
200
>/21
12:
[>9 I
H2 I
I
?5 i
20 J) 6
/20>
112
tl:!'
I I
'li
100
>00
-H
i i
i ¦
; 2')0 )
; 31-10
i
¦ ?iK,
iii (i i'i
25
}»
l
si.i 11 On-.
1 '.i(i('in
^ 2(m
, I
I I
'¦J
10
4|(ti.
Idt i
-------
Table II (cent.)
St.U ion -
8*
i
?A
6 A
Vol^tl lo h action:
ij 8 •iweiiu
1,2 Dtcliloroetliane
'1,1,1 1>" lclilnrethane
1,1 l>icliloreLhdiis
1.1,2 11 ichloroellune
1,1,?,2 Ii'tracliloinetliaiie
j f.liloiofonu
! 1,1 OKliloruPlhylcne
I 1,? Irdiis Oitliloi oetliyl ene
I I ily 1 lu;llf ('lit*
Mi.* Ui>Iuml' Oiloi'ide
i 111 ¦h liii dI it 1 nor nine Ilia nc
j Teli Qj IiloreLliy 1 ltl'
i 1 u I uune
I 1 r i« li loi O'.'thy li-nc
: I
' J_
J-
i
1 —L
1 J '
J.'
j i"
I iJ
' -i
!;£
' M
I
I21
: &
! 3'
I
litp.
• .
» I '
' J'
. 6
lis J
IV-it i< lilt" •
r. r- dor
I'd! - 1 /*-1
n n - i 'tp
"J
W! r
1/0
111 l.ll>, - t I' I OA I Lily (ll'l/l):
I iim 1I
I in ii i
Mlilil
.'on
liri y 11 i(jin
I .Mm i ti'.u
f III 'llll 1 'till
' ll|l|M'l
I, .1.1
Mi-n in /
4
in
¦ II
i
1 I
0 (¦
in
1
/
n
"J
r
3 A
; ?u
?ni
22Uon
I.1.5D0
l
fl
4t i
ti-
hi
! ?I I
id1
111
I ¦
i , i
i --
I tl
I
: u
' 3
D.O.
-------
Stdt ion •
Ik-tiils Cnnt.
1.1 in j ts •
100,000
»_n
I
I y,i 11 III,'
IP Ton ug/1
Nickel
Jliic
Bar ium
Phi'iiul its
r«
i(»
i!»
i! ¦
il'
i
-------
Tat 1e I:;
Western Processing V;cn::v Survey
East Trajn Sata vJy CC-21, !aS2
3 '
1
Station *
u ;¦«
ate'-j
11 (sec-rent!
" H j
t?-; !; ;se-:-.rer.t.
i
Un; ;s
u <;
/I
uq/i9-
yij'
1
u : ¦' * 9
1
— ~ --
LaS Numcer
2C
^^7 ——"r
200:5
"* r, r. *
V "j J
::xs 1
;
i
Date Sampled
5/21
:/21
5/ 2Z
=, :n ;
5
T:me Sampled
11
: '0
1 1:40
i i ¦ rj0
ii-;: *
*
E;t. Scream "low
< 0
.1 cfs
1
A
V
i
1
0
Parameters
I
l
i
J
3/N
F rjc: i on.
i
i
r1jorantnene
.0.
,0.1
- -i
S: 3
9
Naptnalene
-
-
15 m ?
I 0
Di-n-oetyl phthalate
-
0.5
-
1 i
Anthracene/pnenanthrene
_ /
C.-i?
-
-/o
2-
_ 32 *
s;
Pyrene
.
.
G.2t:
-- *
n
icirt
Fr.icr ion:
¦
1 4
2dichloropheno 1
•
-
} m
-
1 J
2,4 dimethyl pnenol
-
-
13
-
\6
Phenol
0.
J
-
1
1 7
Voldt
i 1 es ¦
I i
1,2 dichloretnane
- .. .
_ 1m
-
1 f
1.1.1 trich loroetr.ane
.
e:
-
:o
1,1 -lichloroetfiane
2n
6.3
.:
Ch1oroethane
-
Ci :
::
Chioroforn
2m
5
c
:3
1,1 dichloroethylene
-
12
:t
1,2 trans dichloroethylene
;
2m
: .7 :
:i
Methylene Chloride
-
206
:
73
T elrachloroethyiene
-
:
::
Toluene
-
ic
i20 :
:»
T ricnloroethylene
-
Q7
:
7f
_ "est-
C 1 '!¦="> •
r
30
4,4' 3DT
5
-
31
4,4' DO:
11
-
l:i
32
4,4' ODD
19
-
l -
33
,'leta'
s- . . _
ota i /
' z. ¦* 1 '• *•.
"i= T:< •.¦"Vt
-.a i ¦"
i ' j-*
r: .
34
Arsenic
: j
/ .:
19
-
3!
Cacmium
0.5
-
4 .7
22
: :.
34
Chrom^n
" .
.
-
..10
-
-
11 h
37
Cooper
.
2
-
-
5
31
leaa
2 i
4
-
-2
-
:
3?
Mecury
0 •
-
?. :
"). 2
-
F
JO
Nickel
• r\
; 7
21
\'Z
- I
4 I
I i nc
24 0
2rn
31:0
* ; • ¦> r
" » " * ^
Barn/"
-
:no
*3
5henci'ii
?
' 7 " r • . •
: *
¦ :
j
C.rtn
UC
-
-
f"
-
15
3ri 1 u n'' 3;
r
3
-
-
Canci,
C V ' * / [ -i^rOS 1
1
-
-
-16-
-------
APPENDIX D
Project Work Statement and Opinion of Probable Cost
for the
Initial Remedial Measure
-------
PURPOSE
The purpose of this project is to alleviate any on-site hazard
associated with spilled material.
SCOPE
The Contractor shall provide all equipment and trained personnel
necessary to remove highly contaminated soil in areas where spills are
noticeable or have been identified. In addition, the Contractor shall
provide a safety plan, sampling plan, and spill control plan acceptable
to the EPA or its designee. All procedures shall be subject to review
and approval by the EPA or its designee. Areas to be scraped will be
marked by the EPA or its designee. All spilled material' plus the top
six to twelve inches of soil as approved by the EPA or its designee shall
be placed in DOT-approved 55-gallon drums suitable for both long-term
storage (greater than one year) on-site and transport to an ultimate
disposal site. The Contractor shall sample each drum prior to closing
and shall either provide an on-site laboratory or utilize the services
of a local laboratory for analysis. Drums shall be stacked in designated
on-site locations based upon the contents. The Contractor shall ensure
that the outer surface of each filled drum is free of contamination and
permanently marked, in an approved manner, for identification. At the
conclusion of the work, the Contractor shall submit a report describing
the work completed and an inventory and analytical data on material
placed in storage.
SCHEDULE
The project shall be completed and the report submitted within 75
days of the notice to proceed.
012883 D-l
-------
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
An opinion of probable cost for the Initial Remedial Measure
presented in Table D-l.
012883
D-2
-------
TABU1'. D-l
OP IN TON OF PROBABLE COST
FOR Till' INITIAL REMEDIAL MEASURE
FOR
CLEAN UP OF SPILLS ON OPEN GROUND
Professional Level Hours
Ta s k
1. Prepare Work Plan
2. Preparation of
Contract Documents
and Procurement of
Clean up Services
Contractor
3 . F i naI Report
4. Administration and
Community Relations
SupperL
0-5
45-60
5-10
10-15
15-25
30-40
30-40
80-100 240-320
15-20 35-50
40-60
Technical Level Hoii_r
"1 2 T~
0-5
0-5
0-5
25-30
20-30
5-10
30-50
CIeri cal
Hours
10-15
25-40
20-25
10-15
Subtotal
80-120
440-605
80-120
90-130
Total Labor Hours 690
ToLal Labor CosL $23,600
Clean up Contractor Hours 360
Clean up Contractor Cost $50,000
Storage Drum CosL $2,600
Other DirecL Cost $3,000
Fee $5,500
Total Project Estimate - $84,700
975
$33,200
450
$60,000
$3,900
$5,000
$7,100
$109,200
D-3
-------
APPENDIX E
Task Descriptions and Budget Level Cost Estimate
for the
Remedial Investigation
-------
PURPOSE
The purpose of this activity is to further determine the nature and
extent of contamination at Western Processing and to provide the data
required to develop and evaluate alternatives in the Feasibility Study.
TASK DESCRIPTIONS
This project shall consist of four (4) separate tasks and one
conditional task as outlined below.
Task 1 - Review Existing Data 3nd Documents
Data and reports on conditions at the site will be reviewed to
determine the nature of the contamination problem and the physical
conditions at the site. The report prepared in the current EPA
investigation will be reviewed to better determine the existence
and extent of groundwater contamination and the degree of surface
water quality degradation. This review is necessary to develop site
work, safety, and sampling plans.
Task 2 - Develop Site Work, Safety, and Sampling Plans
A work plan will be developed which describes the work to be con-
ducted during the Remedial Investigation and includes a schedule
for completion of field activities and project reports. A site
specific safety plan for the field investigation will be developed
based on standard safety procedures for hazardous waste sites and
the specific contaminants present at the site. The site safety plan
used during the current EPA investigation will be reviewed and
amended as required. The sampling plan will describe the number
and proposed locations of monitor wells and groundwater and soil
samples (according to the scope of Task 3 and Task A). The specific
analyses to be performed on the samples will be described. All
three plans will be submitted for EPA review prior to conducting
the field activities.
Task 3 - Conduct Soil Sampling and Analyses
The purpose of this field activity is to further define the degree
of contamination and to determine the areal and vertical extent of
contamination so that volumes of waste to be treated and/or disposed
of can be calculated. The extent of soil sampling will be
determined after data from the current EPA investigation is reviewed
in Task 1. Soil samples will be taken at different depths at
several locations. The samples will be sent to an EPA designated
lab for analysis.
012883
E-l
-------
Task A - Conduct Groundwater Sampling (Conditional Task)
This activity will be conducted, as necessary, to better define the
extent and rate of movement of any groundwater contamination. The
number and location of monitoring wells will be determined after
data from the current EPA investigation is reviewed in Task 1. All
samples collected would be sent to an EPA designated lab for
analysis.
Task 5 - Prepare Reports
A draft report will be prepared describing the results of the
Remedial Investigation. This report will be submitted to the DOE
and EPA for review. Review comments will be incorporated into a
final report.
SCHEDULE
The Remedial Investigation shall be completed and the final report
submitted within 120 days of the notice to proceed.
BUDGET LEVEL COST ESTIMATE
A labor and cost estimate for the Remedial Investigation is
presented in Table E-l.
012883
E-2
-------
TAB r,K E-l
MIDGET LEVEL COST ESTIMATE
FOR THE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
Ta s k
Professional T.evel Hours
3 2
Technical Level Honrs
3 2 1
1. Review Existing Data
anil Documents
2. Develop Site Work,
Safety, and Sampling
Plans
3. Conduct Soil Sampling
and Analyses
4. Conduct Groundwater
Sampli ng
5. Prepare ReporLs
6. Connniini ty Relations
Support
8-16
0-16
8-16
8-16
16-24
24-32
0-48
16-32
16-24
32-40
100-120
40-48
0-64
40-64
16-24
24-40
16-24
0-12
4-8
Total Labor Hours
Total Labor Costs
Drilling Costs
Fee
Total Cost
8-16
40-48
0-64
12-16
4-8
536
$16,300
0
Other Direct Costs $ 3,100
8-16
0-12
12-16
4-8
Clerical
lion rs
24-32
32-40
8-12
$ 1,400
$20,800
972
$30,400
$ 8,200
$ 3,300
$ 2,900
$44,800
Snbtota1
48-64
196-272
96-112
0-216
140-216
56-92
Note: Costs do not include laboratory, sample container, and sample shipment costs.
E-3
-------
APPENDIX F
Task Descriptions and Budget Level Cost Estimate
for the
Feasibility Study
-------
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Feasibility Study is to develop and evaluate
remedial alternatives, recommend an appropriate cost effective remedial
measure(s), and develop a conceptual design of the approved remedial
measure(s). The Feasibility Study will evaluate alternatives which
assume both an open and closed site.
SCOPE
This project shall consist of four (A) separate tasks as outlined
below.
Task 1 - Develop Alternatives
Alternatives will be developed for source control remedial actions.
If groundwater contamination is discovered in the current EPA
investigation, alternatives for offsite remedial actions may also
be required.
Task 2 - Evaluate the Alternatives
Depending on the number of alternatives developed in Task 1, the
alternatives will be subjected to an initial screening and/or
detailed analysis. If there are several alternatives, an initial
screening will be performed to narrow the list of potential remedial
actions for further detailed analysis. This initial screening will
eliminate those alternatives that are technically infeasible, have
adverse environmental effects, are substantially more expensive than
other alternatives, or are ineffective in controlling the contami-
nation or mitigating the threat of harm to public health, welfare,
or the environment. If only a few alternatives are identified in
Task 1, or for alternatives remaining after the initial screening,
a more detailed evaluation will be conducted. The "no-action"
alternative of not implementing remedial action will also be
evaluated. A report will be prepared describing the alternative
evaluation and recommending a remedial alternative for remedial
design and implementation. This report will be submitted to the
EPA and the DOE for review, and for approval of the remedial action
alternative.
Task 3 - Prepare a Conceptual Design
A conceptual design will be prepared for the approved remedial
action alternative(s).
012883
F-l
-------
Task 4 - Prepare a Final Report
EPA and DOE comments on the report generated during Task 2 will be
incorporated into a final report which will also contain the
conceptual design of the approved remedial action alternative(s).
SCHEDULE
The feasibility study shall be completed and the final report
submitted within 180 days of the notice to proceed.
BUDGET LEVEL COST ESTIMATES
A labor and cost estimate for the Feasibility Study is presented in
Table F-l.
012883
F-2
-------
TAIJJ.I' F-l
MIDGET LEVEL COST ESTIMATE
FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDY
Professional Level Hours
Technical Level Hours
CIerical
Task
4
3
2
1
3
2
1 Hours
1.
Develop Alternatives
6-15
20-35
60-120
30-50
4-10
1
O
1
o
2.
Evaluate the
1
o
40-68
140-240
80-120
40-60
10-20 30-50
A1ternatives
3.
Prepare Conceptual
4-10
32-60
120-220
48-80
8-16
24-40
24-40
Des i gn
4.
Prepare Final Report
8-16
36-60
80-120
24-40
20-36
8-16 24-40
5.
Community Relations
16-24
24-32
24-32
8-16
8-16 8-16
Support
Total
Labor Honrs
1 ,020
CC
-J"
r-»
Tota L
Labor Costs
§31,300
$53,800
Other
DirecL CosLs
$ 4,500
$ 6,500
Fee
§ 2,500
$ 4,200
Total
Cost
$38,300
$64,500
Subt ota1
128-250
344-568
260-466
200-328
88-136
F-3
------- |