5
  \
Tl
 o
                        /A newsletter about soil,  sediment, and ground-water characterization and remediation technologies
                        Issue 25
                                                                                         July 2006
 This issue o/Technology News and Trends looks back to find lessons learned from projects described in earlier issues of the
 newsletter. These site-specific updates encompass expanded field operations, the results of longer-term monitoring, techniques
for system optimization, and progress toward cleanup closure.
      Biological PRB Application Expanded to Accelerate Perchlorate
                         Degradation in Ground Water
  The success of biological permeable
  reactive barriers  (PRBs) in treating
  contaminated ground water at the Naval
  Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant in
  McGregor, TX, led to construction of a
  second PRB  system comprising 7,000
  feet of treatment trenches in 2004-2005.
  [For more information on the initial PRB
  system, see the February 2004 Technology
  New sand Trends.] Each PRB system targets
  one of three contaminated ground-water
  plumes migrating within separate drainage
  areas toward drinking-water reservoirs that
  serve 500,000 people in central Texas. The
  treatment systems are designed to reduce
  the mass of commingled contaminants in
  the source area, prevent contamination from
  exfiltrating to surface water, remediate
  shallow ground water on offsite property
  within 15 years, and  prevent further
  migration of contaminated ground water
  offsite.

  Burn pads and material burial  sites of the
  facility's former  open burning/open
  detonation area were identified during early
  site investigations as the source of ground-
  water contamination. Contaminants include
  perchlorate in concentrations up to  1,500
  parts per billion (ppb) and trichloroethene
  (TCE) with its associated daughter products
  in similar concentrations. Field studies show
  that perchlorate is the only contaminant
  migrating offsite. As part of the facility-wide
  remediationplan, contaminated soil from the
                         burial sites was excavated for offsite disposal
                         and a RCRA landfill cap was constructed
                         over the burn pad in 2002.

                         Both PRB systems involved placement of
                         2.5-foot-wide barriers (operating in series)
                         in the area's shallow, weathered limestone,
                         which keys into a non-water-bearing zone
                         10-25 feet below ground surface (bgs).
                         Trenches were constructed using atrackhoe
                         and/or rock trencher and backfilled with
                         coarse gravel, wood chips saturated with
                         vegetable oil, and compost. Slotted polyvinyl
                         chloride piping was installed six inches above
                         the  trench bottoms to facilitate eventual
                         replenishment of organic substrates. The
                         initial PRB system, which was completed
                         in 2002 to address the first fully delineated
                         plume, employs seven trenches totaling
                         4,500 linear  feet. The  second system
                         employs  54 trench segments and totals
                         7,000 feet.

                         From the onset  of operations, perchlorate
                         and volatile organic compound (VOC)
                         concentrations in ground water exiting the
                         final barrier of each PRB system have been
                         reduced to non-detect levels. By the end of
                         the second year of operation, in Fall 2004,
                         the  perchlorate mass in ground water
                         decreased approximately  50%, and offsite
                         cleanup was 5-8 years ahead of schedule.
                         Extensive ground-water sampling in January
                         indicated that perchlorate concentrations in
                         many locations are below 0.43  ppb,
                                         [continued on page 2]
                                                                                              Contents
Biological PRB
Application Expanded
to Accelerate
Perchlorate
Degradation in
Ground Water         page 1

Aquifer Monitoring
Shows Complex-Sugar
Flushing Increases
Potential for
Enhanced
Biodegradation        page 2

Combined Treatment
Technologies for TCE
Removal Approach
Cleanup Closure       page 4

Pilot Tests Lead to
Expanded ISCO for
Vadose-Zone
Remediation           page 5

Anacostia  River
Demonstration  Finds
Active Caps
Effectively Contain
Sediment
Contaminants         page 6
                                                                                                 Recycled/Recyclable
                                                                                                 Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper thai
                                                                                                 contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
[continued from page 1]

significantly below the State of Texas 17-
ppb  residential cleanup standard for
perchlorate.

Concurrent to startup of the initial PRB
system, the Navy initiated a multi-year
study at the McGregor facility to identify
geochemical parameters indicating when
rejuvenation is needed  and to establish
engineering protocols for rejuvenation. The
study found that:
 > Total organic carbon (TOC) is the most
   reliable indicator of perchlorate break-
   through. At most sampling  locations
   where breakthrough  appeared immi-
   nent, diminishing TOC concentrations
   (to below 10,000 ppb) were identified.
 > At several locations where nitrate con-
   centrations began  increasing (to
   above 100 ppb), perchlorate concen-
   trations began increasing from non-
   detect levels to above site cleanup
   goals. This correlation suggests that
   nitrate breakthrough is a precursor to
   perchlorate breakthrough.
 > As long as oxidation-reduction poten-
   tial   (ORP)    remained  below
   -50mV, perchlorate usually existed at
   non-detect  levels.  When ORP in-
   creased above this critical value, per-
   chlorate concentrations began to ex-
   ceed site cleanup goals.
 > Several sampling  locations  also
   showed an increase in perchlorate con-
   centrations when methane concentra-
   tions exceeded 2,000 ppb, which sug-
   gests that methane at specific thresh-
   old values indicates  sufficient reduc-
   ing conditions exist for perchlorate
   biotreatment.
 > Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations
   did not correlate highly with the onset
   of perchlorate breakthrough and are
   unlikely indicators of potential break-
   through or rejuvenation needs.
 > Concentrations of humic, fulvic, and
   volatile fatty acids were  more useful
   for understanding organic substrate be-
   havior rather than signaling perchlor-
   ate breakthrough and the need for re-
   juvenation.
Based on the study findings,  the Navy
issued an operations and maintenance
(O&M) manual last year for the McGregor
PRB systems. The O&M process includes
a matrix-based decision tool that scores
geochemical parameters indicating when
rejuvenation of organic substrate is needed.
To ensure that rejuvenation occurs prior to
any breakthrough, the  decision  matrix
includes a safety  factor.

Monitoring of PRB and geochemical
parameters indicate that  the  initial system
now requires its first organic-substrate
replenishment after 3.5 years of operation.
Fresh carbon sources will be injected into
the piping of each of the seven trenches
this summer in accordance with the new
O&M manual. Engineering protocols
during the rejuvenation process will
address the use of perforated piping,
manifold, and substrate feed systems;
installation of permanent injection ports;
ease of injection; applicability and
frequency of vegetable oil emulsions; and
evaluation of costs.

At locations where topographic conditions
prevented installation of PRB trenches,
relatively inexpensive bioborings were
installed to furtherprevent offsite migration
of contaminated  ground water.This
technology employs  10- to  12-inch-
diameterboreholes that extend into the non-
water-bearing  zone   and  contain
biologically reactive media. At McGregor,
these borings were drilled on 10-foot
spacing in three parallel but offset rows.
The boreholes were backfilled with the
same gravel/organic media used in the
trenches, and capped at 2 feet bgs. Nearly
1,300 bioborings currently complement
the biological  PRBs. Performance
evaluation of 200 early bioborings that were
installed during a 2000 pilot study suggests
a minimum lifespan of six years.

Contributed by Mark Craig, U.S. Navy/
NAVFAC South Division
(mark, craig&navy. mil or
843-820-5517), Alan Jacobs, EnSafe
(ajacobs&ensafe.com or 901-372-
7962), and Ronnie Britto, EnSafe
(rbritto&.ensafe.com or 901-372-7962)
Aquifer Monitoring Shows Complex-Sugar Flushing Increases Potential for Enhanced Biodegradation
Aquifer flushing was conducted on a
site at the Naval Amphibious Base Little
Creek (NABLC) in Virginia Beach, VA,
in 2002 to remove dense non-aqueous
phase liquid (DNAPL). The flushing
system employed a solution containing
cyclodextrin (CD) to increase solubility
and removal efficiency of chlorinated
solvents. The extracted CD solution was
treated through air stripping and reused
in a subsequent flushing event. Within
six months of the injections, preliminary
results  indicated a 50% removal of
DNAPL,  which  contained primarily
trichloroethene (TCE). [For details on
this application, view the January 2003
Technology News and Trends.} More
complete analysis of contaminant levels
in the extracted solutions now confirms
that cyclodextrin-enhanced flushing
(CDEF)  resulted  in  a   19-fold
improvement in the volumetric rate at
which chlorinated solvents could be
extracted from a DNAPL-contaminated
aquifer.

Researchers from Louisiana State
University (LSU) and the University of
Rhode Island (URI) conducted a
ground-water monitoring program over
the last three years to evaluate the long-
term  impact of residual CD in the

               [continued on page 3]

-------
[continued from page 2]
aquifer. The unconfined aquifer consists
primarily of sorted sand with an average
porosity of 31%, and the average ground-
water flow velocity is 9 cm/day. Ground-
water geochemistry parameters and
contaminant concentrations were tracked
for 14  months during three sampling
rounds after the final flushing event, on
days 210, 342, and 425.

During each round, conditions were
measured at eight  wells in the  CD
treatment zone and at another eight
wells located within 100 meters of the
treatment   zone.    Geochemical
parameters that were measured in the
field using portable equipment included
temperature, pH, electroconductivity,
ground-water flow velocity, depth, and
terminal electron acceptors (TEAs)
(DO, sulfate,  nitrate, and total iron).
Laboratory  analyses of ground-water
samples was conducted to determine
TOC content and the concentrations of
target compounds, primarily TCE and
1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and  its
degradation product 1,1 -dichloroethene
(DCE).

TOC was used  as  a cost-effective
measure of the effective concentration
of CD  and its metabolites  because
residual CD concentrations exceeded
naturally occurring organic-carbon
concentrations (0.25  g/L) by more than
two orders of magnitude. In the three
sampling rounds, TOC analysis showed
that average concentrations within the
CD treatment zone were 6.32 g/L, 3.55
g/L, and 2.07 g/L,  respectively. Data
showed that only one-third of the CD
remained in the aquifer 425 days after
the final flushing event, but that TOC
remained in average concentrations
eight-fold above background.

Persistence of TOC in the CD injection
zone also was associated with lower
levels  of DO, nitrate,  and sulfate
(respectively 46%, 81%, and 98% lower
than background). At the beginning of
the post-flushing monitoring period, DO
averaged 0.44 mg/L in the wells outside
the treatment zone and 0.24 mg/L within
the zone. During the two later sampling
rounds, DO levels within the treatment
zone increased to 0.27 mg/L and then to
0.38 mg/L. These levels were considered
insufficient to support effective aerobic
biodegradation of the CD, since typical
carbon sources require  a minimum DO
concentration near 2 mg/L.

Nitrate analysis on samples  from the
second and third rounds of sampling
showed that concentrations were below
the detection limit (0.1 mg/L) within the
treatment zone and ranged from 0.1 to
0.8 mg/L with an average of 0.48 mg/L
outside the zone. Sulfate concentrations
also inversely related to TOC. At the 10
sample  locations where TOC levels
exceeded 1 g/L (averaging 4.24 g/L),
sulfate  concentrations ranged from
below 0.1 to 2.0 mg/L  with an average
of 1.14 mg/L. At the 12 locations where
TOC levels were below  1 g/L (averaging
0.32 mg/L), sulfate  concentrations
ranged from 0.4 to 51.3 with an average
of 13.7 mg/L. Unlike the other TEAs,
iron  showed no correlation with TOC
or   other   ground-water   quality
parameters. These findings suggest that
subsurface injection of CD provided an
effective carbon source for increased
bioactivity in the aquifer and  produced
anaerobic conditions, thereby producing
a favorable environment for microbial
degradation  of the highly chlorinated
contaminants.

Over the monitoring period,  aqueous
concentrations of 1,1-DCE, 1,1,1-TCA,
and  TCE  within the  injection zone
decreased  38%,  81%,  and  94%,
respectively.  Reduction of contaminants
in monitoring wells outside the injection
zone could not be estimated with high
confidence because those concentrations
were at or below analytical detection
limits. As such, the outside monitoring
wells served as poor experimental
controls  and  could  not  provide
circumstantial evidence that residual
CD solutions acted as  secondary
means of remediation for highly
chlorinated organic solvents.

Monitoring of aquifer temperature,
pH,  and  ground-water   flow
indicated  no   biofouling   and
suggests  that CD concentrations
will  decrease   to pre-flushing
concentrations in approximately two
years.  Although  CD-enhanced
biodegradation was not the primary
treatment objective at this site, the
CDEF process apparently benefited
from  the presence of residual CD
solution. Additional research is needed
to evaluate the feasibility of injecting
CD solely for the purpose of enhanced
biodegradation.

The U.S.  Department of Defense's
Environmental Security  Technology
Certification Program  (ESTCP)
completed a  cost and performance
analysis of CDEF implementation at
the NABLC. (The full  report  is
available at  http://www.estcp.org/
documents/techdocs/cu-0113 .pdf.)
When comparing  CDEF to alternate
remediation technologies, the analysis
indicates CDEF capital costs (totaling
$296,000) were  150% more than
conventional pumping and treatment
but only 33% of the potential cost
for  surfactant-enhanced aquifer
remediation (SEAR). Significant
differences also were identified  in
O&M costs, which were estimated at
$498,000 for SEAR, $1,197,000 for
CDEF, and $1,385,000 for pumping
and treatment.

While total implementation costs for
these  technologies  are comparable,
both CDEF and SEAR technologies
significantly reduce the time needed for
complete remediation.  CDEF  also
offers the benefit of introducing only
nontoxic and degradable material into
the subsurface. ESTCP analysis  of
              [continued on page 4]

-------
[continued from page 3]

CDEF performance  indicates that the
technology  is most suited to removal
of residual NAPL;  its use for free-
moving NAPL should follow other
technologies  such  as free-product
skimming.   The   technology   is
appropriate  for  use  in  lowering
contaminant concentrations sufficiently
to allow otherwise unfeasible remediation
approaches   such   as   enhanced
bioremediation.

Contributed by William Blanford, LSU
(blanford&geol.Isu.edu or 225-578-
3955), Thomas Boving, Ph.D., URI
(boving&.uri.edu or 401-874-7053),
and Roy Wade, U.S. Army Engineer
Research and Development Center
(roy.wade&erdc. usace. army.mil or
601-634-4019)
            Combined Treatment Technologies for TOE Removal Approach Cleanup Closure
Use of soil vapor extraction (SVE)
partially enhanced  by  electrical
resistance heating (ERH) at the Air Force
Plant 4 (AFP4) in Forth Worth, TX, over
the past  13  years has resulted in
successful removal of volatile and semi-
volatile contaminants in the site's vadose
and saturated zones. Treatment of the
contaminated soil and ground water
posed unique challenges due to the
presence of TCE  in the vadose zone
directly below the plant's "Building 181."
In one of the building's monitoring wells,
TCE concentrations were as high as
1,400 mg/L.

The area under Building 181 is the
primary source of the AFP4's operable
unit 1 (OU1) ground-water contaminant
plume. As part of the OU1 source-area
remediation plan, vadose-zone treatment
was needed to prevent TCE  migration
into the alluvial ground-water  system,
which in turn threatened the regional
aquifer. The vadose-zone TCE under the
building serves as a source of ground-
water contamination under an adjacent
parking lot. Alluvium in this area consists
of clayey fill and gravelly clay with low
permeability,  conditions  shown in the
past to be amenable to SVE applications.

In 1993, the  U.S. Air Force (USAF)
constructed an SVE pilot system. The
system employed eight extraction wells,
seven of which extended up to five feet
bgs and one which extended 35 feetbgs
into the alluvial terrace. It also included
19 soil-gas monitoring probes, a 7.5-
horsepower   blower  for  vapor
extraction, and two 3,000-pound carbon
vessels for TCE removal. The first 90
days of SVE operations  resulted in
removal of 4,400 pounds of TCE.

Following three years of successful pilot
operations, SVE was selected as the final
remedy for AFP4 and major system
upgrades were initiated.  The full-scale
system included 36 soil-gas extraction
wells, three dual-phase extraction wells,
and  numerous  soil-gas probes  and
piezometers  to  measure  system
performance. An additional vacuum
blower, expanded piping network, and a
new semi-permanent operations building
also were  added. Instead of the vapor-
phase carbon adsorption used during the
pilot, catalytic oxidation vapor treatment
technology (COVTS)  was installed to
treat recovered TCE vapors.

The  full-scale  SVE system began
operating on a continuous basis in March
2000. During its six-month startup, the
system removed  1,521 pounds of TCE.
As influent concentrations declined, the
COVTS equipment became uneconomical
to operate and was replaced in May 2002
with activated carbon adsorbers. At that
time, analytical sampling indicated TCE
concentrations in source-area soil were
slightly above the  11.5-mg/kg cleanup
goal, and higher TCE concentrations were
detected at some locations near the original
release area. A review of the system's
long-term performance indicated that the
application of an additional treatment
technology in the source area would likely
accelerate cleanup and achieve  the
remedial action objectives.

Based on the site characteristics,
technology screening, and pilot-test
results, a full-scale ERH system was
installed in 2002 to enhance source-area
treatment efficiency. ERH technology
employs electrical resistance to heat
contaminated soil, thereby helping to
vaporize residual contaminants, ground
water, vadose-zone  moisture, and
perched water. The system targeted
27,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil
in a 0.5-acrea area under the floor of
the building. A total of 63 ERH electrodes
and  co-located vapor and steam
recovery wells operated continuously
over nine months. [See the December
2004 Technology News and Trends for
details on this application.] Existing SVE
pipes, wells, and auxiliary equipment
were used for ERH implementation.

The  combined SVE-ERH treatment
approach removed 1,743 pounds of
TCE. The ERH system was shut down
in December 2002 when cleanup goals
for both soil and ground water in the
target area were met at 11.5 mg/kg and
10 mg/L, respectively. (One well (MV-
10) could not be heated  due to equipment
failure and still contained elevated TCE
concentrations; the USAF will apply a
localized treatment if  monitoring does
not indicate a trend of decreasing TCE
concentrations  in the  well.) The
aboveground ERH system and ancillary
equipment were removed in 2003, while
              [continued on page 5]

-------
 [continued from page 4]
the  SVE and monitoring systems
continued  to  operate. Temporary
shutdowns of the SVE system occurred
periodically to evaluate soil-vapor
rebound, and only minimal rebound was
detected.

Monitoring throughout 2004-2005
showed  an  average   mean  TCE
concentration in soil of 0.184 mg/kg,
significantly below the 11.5-mg/kg target
for OU1. The mean TCE concentration
in ground water also was far below its
 10-mg/L  target,  and averaged 4.1
mg/L.  Downgradient  dual-phase
extraction wells with concentrations
exceeding 20 mg/L before  SVE-ERH
treatment   now    exhibit    TCE
concentrations below  1 mg/L, well
below the  remediation target (Figure 1).
As a result, the USAF currently  is
shutting  down  the SVE  system,
evaluating the MW-10 well area, and
conducting any final remedial actions in
preparation  for OU1 clean-up closure
later this year.

Contributed by George Walters,
Aeronautical Systems Center/
Engineering Directorate
(george.walters&wpafb.af.mil or
937-255-1988)
    5-50 og/l
    50-500 ug/l
    500-5,000 ijg/1
  • 5000-10,000 ug/l
  • >10,000 ug/l
                                                      Carswel! Landfills 4 & 5
                                                       Interim Ground-water
                                                        Treatment System
   Parking Lot
Interim Ground-water
 Treatment System

                  Building 181
                Electrical Resistive
                  Heating 2002
                                                                                            Carswell Landfills 4 & 5
                                                                                            Permeable Reactive
                                                                                                 Barrier
                                        TCE Concentrations
                                         5-50 ug/l
                                         50-500 ug/l
                                         500-5,000 ug/l
                                         5000-10,000 ug/l
                                         > 10,000 ug/l
                       Parking Lot
                     Final Ground-Water
                      Remedial Action
                     Pilot Tests Lead to Expanded ISCO for Vadose-Zone Remediation
Following successful pilot-scale field
testing of in-situ chemical oxidation
(ISCO) in 2001, the USAF began an
expanded-scale application in 2003 to
remove chlorinated solvents  from an
upgradient source area at Air Force Plant
44 in Tucson, AZ. [For information on
site conditions and details concerning the
pilot test, see the January 2003 issue of
Technology News and Trends.} During
both the pilot and expanded operations,
potassium permanganate solutions were
injected  to  remove  residual high
concentrations of TCE from fine-grained
                  alluvial sediments in the upper part of
                  the regional aquifer.

                  The  expanded-scale treatment area,
                  known  as   IRP   Site  2,  covers
                  approximately 12 acres and is the most
                  upgradient and heavily contaminated
                                 [continued on page 6]

-------
[continued from page 5]

source area for a two-square-mile
plume of TCE-contaminated ground
water. A pump-and-treat system has
operated since  1987  for plume
remediation, and a former SVE system
removed more than 75,000 pounds of
TCE from vadose-zone  soil. Despite
SVE success, TCE concentrations in
ground water remained elevated in
vadose soil extending to a depth of 150
feet.   Injection   of   potassium
permanganate in a single well during
the August 2001 pilot test produced a
localized, temporary decrease in TCE
concentrations.

In January 2003, the USAF began the
large-scale ISCO effort involving single
injections of potassium permanganate
in multiple wells across IRP Site 2.
Sixteen former SVE wells were used
to inject into the lower vadose zone,
and eight ground-water wells were used
to inject directly into the  upper part of
the regional aquifer. To  reflect 2001
pilot-test results suggesting that the use
of  greater volumes of  more dilute
solutions may increase effectiveness,
potassium permanganate  was injected
in concentrations of 0.3-0.5% rather
than the 2%  solution previously used.
A total of 16,000 pounds  of potassium
permanganate were  injected.  To
enhance  operation ease and reduce
intrusive activities, the 20,000-gallon
batch-tank system used in the pilot test
was replaced by a portable flow-through
system  tailored  for   potassium
permanganate delivery in the expanded
injection program. Both vertical and
horizontal flooding techniques were
used.

Monitoring methods and frequencies
were optimized to reflect University of
Arizona research findings from the pilot-
scale application.  Monitoring was
conducted quarterly rather than weekly
due to the slow  changes occurring in
subsurface conditions. In addition, the
large-scale application focused on key
ground-water monitoring parameters that
included ORP, temperature,  pH and
conductivity,  and   color  (purple
indicating the presence of potassium
permanganate). Quarterly  monitoring
also included laboratory analysis  of
ground-water samples  collected within
and  downgradient  of the  treatment
area  to  determine  changing TCE
concentrations.

Three years  after the  large-scale
injections, active (based on observed
color) potassium permanganate remained
in the injection wells to varying degrees
and  for varying  durations.  This
persistence  was attributed to the
aquifer's  low  TOC content, which was
estimated at 0.1%. TCE concentrations
in the treatment wells began to rebound
over time at differing rates. As a result,
an additional 4,600 pounds of potassium
permanganate were injected  last fall
using the same field methods in 10
selected wells: three previously-treated
regional aquifer wells, two previously-
untreated regional aquifer wells,  and
five previously-untreated vadose-zone
wells.

To measure treatment effectiveness, pre-
and post-injection TCE concentrations
were  compared  in ground-water
samples  collected from  17 wells for
which complete data were available.
Laboratory analysis  of  samples
collected  in November 2001, before the
initial injection, indicated TCE
concentrations averaging 297 ug/L.
Post-treatment samples collected  this
past February (two months after the
final  injection)  contained TCE
concentrations averaging 18.4 ug/L,
demonstrating a 94% reduction. The
USAF anticipates continued operation
of the IRP  Site 2 pump-and-treat
system, and additional ground-water
treatment, if needed. ISCO field-testing
(but without  the  same degree of
research activities) also was performed
at IRP Site 3 in 2001 and expanded to a
large-scale system in 2004-2005.

Contributed by George Warner, USAF
(george.warner&wpafb.af.mil or
937-255-3241) and Timothy J. Allen,
Raytheon (tjallen&raytheon.com or
520-794-9450)
    Anacostia River Demonstration Finds Active Caps Effectively Contain Sediment Contaminants
 In March 2004, innovative cap materials
 were placed in the Anacostia River in
 Washington, DC, to  demonstrate their
 applicability  for management  of
 sediment contaminants. Conventional
 sand caps are designed to reduce
 contaminant release from sediments by
 physically isolating contaminants from
 organisms and the water column. The
 active capping process underway at the
Anacostia, however, involves covering
contaminants with layers of alternative
materials that offer treatment and/or
sequestration of contaminants.

Following extensive site characterization
studies  and two years of laboratory
treatability studies, three alternative cap
technologies  were included in the
demonstration: AquaBlok™, apatite, and
coke breeze in a laminated mat [see the
May 2004 Technology News and Trends
for details on the technology selection
process]. Six-inch layers of AquaBlok
and apatite were emplaced and covered
by 6 inches of sand. The 1-inch layer
of coke breeze in a laminated mat was
also covered with 6 inches of sand. The

              [continued on page 7]

-------
  Figure 2. A recent vertical profile for
  PAHs in the coke breeze-laminated
  capping area shows a high degree of
  containment of sediment contaminants
  and recontamination from
  unremediated areas of the Anacostia
  River at the surface.
[continued from page 6]

control area consisted of 1 foot of sand.
Monitoring approximately one month
after placement confirmed that each of
the materials was placed effectively in
the river despite a relatively crude
placement approach and the thin target
thickness. The average  variation in
layer thickness  was approximately
30%, with less than one to two inches
of  intermixing  with  underlying
contaminated sediments.

AquaBlok, apatite, and sand were
placed using  conventional clamshell
bucket techniques. Placement was
monitored  through use of a high-
resolution digital global positioning
system attached to the arm of the
crane. Coke breeze in the laminated mat
was emplaced by tacking one end of a
10-foot-wide, 100-foot-long roll of mat
and unrolling it through use of a crane.
Divers then ensured proper placement
of each roll, with small overlaps.
Laminated  mat was selected for the
coke placement due to the low density
of coke and the relatively high fraction
(10-20%) of non-settleable material that
likely would result if coke were placed
through conventional techniques.

Performance   monitoring   was
conducted at  six and 18 months  after
cap   placements.   Geophysical
parameters were used to evaluate any
changes in bathymetry and to  identify
changes in surficial site characteristics
such as the deposition of new fine-
grained sediments. Sediment coring
also was conducted  to determine
vertical  profiles of contaminant
| Coke-Core 1 Total PAHs vs Depth October 2005



1 'in
1
1 c

If
1 03
1 t
8
c
1_
03
Q.
CC
O
>
O
0)
CD
Q.
Q


0 2000
0
1 -
2 -
3i
4-
5 i
J

7 -
8 -

9 -

10 -
11 -
12 -
f
J_
iCB-CI-S-04

iCB-C1-S-06
(Month 18 Monitoring Event)
Total PAHs Concentration (ug/kg)


4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
-R r-i ^ m S" Sand Layer
SD- Sediment Layer
CB- Coke Breeze

D- Duplicate Sample

Sand
	 Cuke .Breeze Mai










Native Sediment
CB-CI-SD-04-D I












CB-CI-SD-04

















concentrations. Innovative  monitoring
approaches employed  on the low-
permeability AquaBlok cap included the
use of seepage meters to evaluate any
reductions in ground-water flow and an
inclinometer to detect small vertical
deflections that may occur due to tides
or gas movement.

The influence of AquaBlok, for which
the primary objective is permeability
control, could be measured immediately.
Seepage  meters  during  the  two
monitoring events showed significant
reductions in ground-water flows, from
1-5 cm/day to significantly less than 1
cm/day.  The  low  permeability of
AquaBlok also led to accumulation and
irregular release of gas from this cap
material,  although without apparent
enhancement of contaminant migration
or  decrease   in  long-term  cap
performance.

Monitoring results confirm that extensive
time is needed for polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons  (PAHs)  and  metal
contaminants to migrate  within the
materials, which allows  for extended
intermixing of  the cap  material and
underlying  sediment.  Results  also
indicate that all of the cap materials,
including the sand control plot, are
effectively  containing contaminants.
For example, data indicate that the coke
breeze mat  efficiently contains PAHs
near the surface (Figure 2), particularly
due to movement of new contaminated
sediment onto the surface of the cap.

              [continued on page 8]
            Contact Us
    Technology News and Trends
           is on the NET!
     View, download, subscribe,
        and unsubscribe at:
        http://www.epa.gov/tio
     http://cluin.org/newsletters
    Technology News and Trends
    welcomes readers' comments
     and  contributions. Address
        correspondence to:
           John Quander
   Office of Superfund Remediation
     and  Technology Innovation
              (5203P)
    U.S. Environmental Protection
              Agency
          Ariel Rios Building
     1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
       Washington, DC 20460
        Phone: 703-603-7198
        Fax:  703-603-9135

-------
                                                    Solid Waste and
                                                    Emergency Response
                                                    (5203P)
                                 EPA 542-N-06-004
                                 July 2006
                                 Issue No. 25
     United States
     Environmental Protection Agency
     National Service Center for Environmental Publications
     P.O. Box 42419
     Cincinnati, OH 45242
             Presorted Standard
             Postage and Fees Paid
             EPA
             Permit No. G-35
     Official Business
     Penalty for Private Use $300
       [continued from page 7]
       Long-term effectiveness of the active
       cap materials and performance relative
       to the sand control will be evaluated
       again this Fall for 2006,30 months after
       placement.   The   demonstration
       continues to show that alternative cap
       materials can be placed effectively in
a riverine environment and that all of the
caps  are   efficiently   containing
contaminants. Monitoring will continue
for a minimum of one additional year to
better quantify the cap performance and
to help identify the performance benefits
of active caps over conventional sand
caps.
Contributed by Danny Reible, Ph.D.
University of Texas
(reible(q)mail.utexas.edu or 512-471-
4642)
     EPA is publishing this newsletter as a means of disseminating useful information regarding innovative and alternative treatment techniques and
8    technologies. The Agency does not endorse specific technology vendors.

-------