United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102G)
EPA-542-R-00-010
September 2000
www.epa.gov
clu-in.org
&EPA.
Solidification/Stabilization Use at
Superfund Sites
-------
Notice and Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Technology Innovation Office
under EPA Contract Number 68-W-99-003. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For more information about this project, please contact:
Carl Ma, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Technology Innovation Office, Ariel Rios Building, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MS 5 102G), Washington, D.C., 20460; (703) 603-9903, e-mail: ma.carl@epa.gov.
This document may be obtained from EPA's web site at www.epa.gov/tio/, or at du-in.org. A limited number of hard
copies of this document are available free of charge by mail from EPA's National Service Center for Environmental
Publications, at the following address (please allow 4 to 6 weeks for delivery):
U.S. EPA/National Service Center for Environmental Publications
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Phone: (513) 489-8190 or (800) 490-9198
Fax: (513) 489-8695
-------
Summary
Solidification/stabilization (S/S) is an established technology that has been used for almost 20 years to treat
a variety of wastes at Superfund remedial sites throughout the country. Historically, S/S has been one of the top
five source control treatment technologies used at Superfund remedial sites. To provide interested stakeholders
such as project managers, technology service providers, consulting engineers, site owners, and the general public
with the most recent information about S/S applications at Superfund sites, as well as information about trends
in use, specific types of applications, and cost, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) performed a
review and analysis of S/S applications and prepared this summary.
Highlights of S/S use at Superfund remedial sites include:
• Trends in Use - S/S is one of the top five source control treatment technologies used at Superfund
remedial sites, having been used at more than 160 sites since FY 1982. The frequency with which S/S
was selected as a remedy increased during the late 1980s and early 1990s, reaching a peak in FY 1992,
and then generally decreasing through FY 1998.
• Project Status - Many of the S/S projects (62 percent) have been completed, with an estimated 21
percent in the predesign/design stage. Overall, completed S/S projects represent 30 percent of all
completed projects in which treatment technologies have been used for source control. In addition, the
average operational time for S/S projects was I.I months, which is shorter than other technologies such
as soil vapor extraction, land treatment, and composting.
• Types of Applications - A majority of S/S projects at Superfund remedial sites are ex situ applications where
inorganic binders and additives were used to treat metal-containing waste. Organic binders were used for
specialized waste such as radioactive wastes and those containing specific hazardous organic compounds. S/S
was used to treat wastes containing only organics for a small number (6 percent) of the projects.
• Performance - Most performance testing for S/S waste products is conducted after curing is
completed, and only limited data are available on long-term performance of S/S at Superfund remedial
sites. Available performance data for metals for these projects showed that S/S met the established
performance goals. Only limited data were available on organics; however, S/S met the established
performance goals for several projects.
• Cost - Information about the cost of using S/S to treat wastes at Superfund remedial sites was available
for 29 completed projects. The total cost ranged from $75,000 to $16 million.The average cost per
cubic yard for these S/S projects was $264, including two projects with relatively high costs
(approximately $1,200 per cubic yard each). Excluding those two projects, the average cost per cubic
yard for S/S was $ 194.
Sources of information about S/S used for this summary included Superfund Records of Decision (RODs), ROD
amendments, and Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) issued by EPA through FY 1998; data and
analyses contained in EPA's Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (ninth edition) (ASR);
information being collected for the tenth edition of the ASR, expected to be published later this year; and EPA's
REmediation And CHaracterization Innovative Technologies (EPA REACH IT) system.
What is Solidification/Stabilization
The term "solidification/stabilization" refers to a general category of processes that are used to treat a
wide variety of wastes, including solids and liquids. Solidification and stabilization are each distinct
technologies, as described below (EPA, 1997, Portland Cement Association 1991):
• Solidification - refers to processes that encapsulate a waste to form a solid material and to restrict
contaminant migration by decreasing the surface area exposed to leaching and/or by coating the waste
with low-permeability materials. Solidification can be accomplished by a chemical reaction between a
waste and binding (solidifying) reagents or by mechanical processes. Solidification of fine waste particles
is referred to as microencapsulation, while solidification of a large block or container of waste is referred
to as macroencapsulation.
-------
• Stabilization - refers to processes that involve chemical reactions that reduce the leachability of a
waste. Stabilization chemically immobilizes hazardous materials or reduces their solubility through a
chemical reaction. The physical nature of the waste may or may not be changed by this process.
For S/S applications at Superfund sites, the regulatory definition of stabilization under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) may be relevant to a project. Under the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR) program
(40 CFR part 268), stabilization is the required treatment standard for certain types of waste. In addition,
stabilization may be used to render a RCRA hazardous waste (defined under 40 CFR part 260) non-hazardous
prior to disposal. RCRA defines stabilization (40 CFR 268.42) as "[a process that] involves the use of the
following reagents (or waste reagents): (I) Portland cement; or (2) lime/pozzolans (e.g., fly ash and cement kiln
dust) - this does not preclude the addition of reagents (e.g., iron salts, silicates, and clays) designed to enhance
the set/cure time and/or compressive strength, or to overall reduce the leachability of the metal or inorganic."
In addition, S/S processes can involve the use of very high temperatures (usually greater than 1,500 °F) to vitrify
wastes, forming glass-like waste products. However, these S/S processes are not addressed in this summary.
Use of S/S at Superfund Sites
Recent information about the use of S/S at Superfund remedial sites indicates that S/S has been used at
67 sites since FY 1982. Exhibit I shows the number of projects by status for the following stages -
predesign/design, design completed/being installed, operational, and completed. Data are shown for in situ and ex situ
S/S projects. In addition, information about all source control technologies is provided. With respect to S/S
projects, the majority of both in situ and ex situ projects (62 percent) are completed, followed by projects in the
predesign/design stage (21 percent). Overall, completed S/S projects represent 30 percent of all completed
Superfund projects in which treatment technologies have been used for source control. (Appendix A contains
summary information, where available, for these S/S projects).
Exhibit 1: Percentage of Superfund Remedial Projects by Status
60%
u
co
CO
en
co
tj
CO
In Situ S/S
Ex Situ S/S
All Source Control Technologies
Predesig n/Desig n
Design Completed/
Being Installed
Project Status
Operational
Completed
Data Source: ASR (9th Edition), FY'98 RODs
Number of Projects: Source Control = 682, Ex Situ S/S = 139, In Situ S/S =
-------
Remedy Selection Trends
Exhibit 2 shows the top five source control
treatment technologies used at Superfund remedial sites
from FY 1982 through FY 1998. Cumulatively, S/S projects
are the second most common type of source control
treatment technology implemented at these sites, representing
24 percent of all source control treatment technology projects.
Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is the most common technology
implemented, representing 28 percent of all source
control treatment technology projects.
Exhibit 3 shows the trend in selection of S/S as a remedy
at Superfund remedial sites between FY 1982 and FY
1998 and compares the selection of S/S remedies with all
other treatment technologies. The frequency with which
S/S was selected as a remedy increased during the late
1980s and early 1990s, reaching a peak in FY 1992, and
then generally decreasing through FY 1998. The trend in
S/S remedy selection during this time frame is similar to
that for all source control treatment technologies.
i'Remedy Changes
Exhibit 2: Top 5 Source Control Treatment
Technologies Used at Superfund Remedial Sites
Soil Vapor Extraction 28%
Solidification/Stabilization 24%
Incineration (off-site) 13%
Bioremediation 11%
Thermal Desorption 9%
Exhibit 3: RODs Selecting Solidification/Stabilization
Remedies vs. All Source Control RODs
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98
Fiscal Year
Note: Source control treatment RODs are defined as RODs selecting one or
more treatment technologies to treat the source of the contamination
Exhibit 4 compares the number of RODs in which S/S was selected with the actual number of S/S
projects implemented each year from FY 1982 through FY 1998. The differences between the number of
RODs where S/S was selected as the remedy and the number of S/S projects implemented reflects changes in
the remedies that occurred during the remedial process. Between FY 1982 and FY 1987 and between FY 1994
and FY 1998, the number of S/S remedies implemented is close to the number of S/S remedies selected in
RODs. From FY 1988 through FY 1993, there is a larger gap between the number of S/S remedies selected and
the number implemented. As shown in Exhibit 3, this time frame corresponds to the fiscal years in which S/S
was most frequently selected as a remedy.
Exhibit 5 shows the remedies that were selected to replace S/S. Off-site disposal was the most frequently
selected (27 percent) remedy, followed by on-site containment (15 percent).
Exhibit 4: Selection Versus Implementation of
Solidification/Stabilization Remedies
40
35
I"
^ 20
_D
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98
Fiscal Year
Exhibit 5: Remedies Selected to Replace
Solidification/Stabilization
Total Number of Projects = 59
Institutional Controls (2)
No Further Action (3) ,
5% \ /
3%
Data Not Available (23)
40%
Other Treatment (6)
10%
Containment (on site) (9)
15%
Disposal (off site) (16)
27%
Data Source: ASR (9th Edition) FV98 RODs
Note: Does include 4 projects in which other treatment technologies were changed to S/S
-------
Reasons cited by project managers for replacing S/S as a remedy are presented in Exhibit 6.
Exhibit 6: Reasons Cited by Project Managers for Replacing S/S as the Remedy
(I) The estimated volume of contaminated material had decreased such that S/S was no longer cost effective
(2) S/S could not meet the required treatment standards for the waste at the site
(3) The cost of S/S was too high
(4) S/S had originally been selected to treat residuals from other treatment technologies at the site. When
little or no residuals were generated, S/S was no longer necessary
(5) The community expressed concerns about on-site treatment of wastes
(6) There were problems implementing S/S
(7) S/S could not significantly reduce the mobility of a specific waste
Specific Types of S/S Applications
Exhibit 7 shows a breakdown of the S/S projects by type of application which include ex situ solidification/
stabilization, in situ solidification/stabilization, ex situ stabilization only, and in situ stabilization only. A specific type of
S/S application was identified for 88 percent of the projects. Solidification/stabilization (in situ and ex situ)
represents 63 percent of the S/S projects compared to 15 percent for stabilization only (in situ and ex situ).
Exhibit 8 shows the types of binder materials used for S/S projects at Superfund remedial sites, including
inorganic binders, organic binders, and combination organic and inorganic binders. Many of the binders used
include one or more proprietary additives. Examples of inorganic binders include cement, fly ash, lime, soluble
silicates, and sulfur-based binders, while organic binders include asphalt, epoxide, polyesters, and polyethylene.
More than 90 percent of the S/S projects used inorganic binders. In general, inorganic binders are less expensive
and easier to use than organic binders. Organic binders are generally used to solidify radioactive wastes or
specific hazardous organic compounds.
Exhibit?: Solidification/Stabilization Projects by Type
Total Number of Projects = 167
Type of S/S TBD or
Unknown (37)*
22%
Solidification/Stabilization
in situ (21)
13%
Stabilization Only -
ex situ (22)
13%
Stabilization
in situ (4)
2% Solidification/Stabilization -
ex situ (83)
50%
* Includes 3 in situ projects
Data Source: EPA and State Project Managers
Note: Number of projects for each type is shown in parenthese. TBD = to be determined
Exhibit 8: Binder Materials Used for
Solidification/Stabilization Projects
Total Number of Projects = 59
Inorganic and Organic
Binders (2)
3%
Organics Binders Only (2)
3%
Inorganic Binders Only (55)
94%
Data Source: EPAand State Project Managers
Note: Inorganic binders consist of cement, fly ash, lime, soluble silicates, or sulfur
Organic binders consist of asphalt, organophilic cay, or activated carbon.
4
-------
Exhibit 9 summarizes the specific types of binders and
reagents used in S/S projects at Superfund remedial sites.
Cement is the most common binder (47 projects), followed
by proprietary additives (22 projects), and phosphate (14
projects).
Exhibit 10 shows the types of contaminant groups and
combination of contaminant groups treated by S/S at
Superfund remedial sites. S/S was used to treat metals only
in 56 percent of the projects, and used to treat metals alone
or in combination with organics or radioactive metals at
approximately 90 percent of the sites. S/S was used to treat
organics only at 6 percent of the sites.
Exhibit I I provides a further breakdown of the metals
treated by S/S at Superfund remedial sites. The top five
metals treated by S/S are lead, chromium, arsenic, cadmium,
and copper.
Exhibit 9: Binders and Reagents Used for S/S
Projects
Binder or Reagent
Cement
Proprietary reagents
Phosphate
pH controls
Fly ash
Lime
Sulfur
Asphalt
1
Other organics used include granular activated carbon
and organophilic clay.
* A project may use more than one binder or reagent
Exhibit 10: Contaminant Types Treated by S/S
Total Number of Projects = 163
Radioactive Metals Nonmetals only (2)
and Organics (1) / 1%
1% 1 L-Organic and Nonmetals (1)
1%
Metals and
Organic (50)
Metals
Only (92)
56%
31%
RadioactiveMetals
and Metals (4T
2%
Radioactive Metals (3)
2% Organics Only (10)
Data Source: EPA and State Project Managers
Note: Metals are defined as heavy metals. Data indicates how many projects are
addressing each type of contaminant group and are not necessari^ indicate of
how well the technology has treated each type of group
Exhibit 11: Number of S/S Projects Treating Specific Metals
120
100
tj 80
&. 60
M—
O
fc 40
_o
E
^ 20
i
I" I 41
Mm...
Type of Metal Contaminant
Exhibit 12 shows the types of sites treated by S/S projects. Waste management/disposal areas, organic chemical
manufacturing, petroleum refining, and metal ore mining, smelting and recycling facilities were the most common
site types addressed by S/S.
Time of Operation
Data on completed S/S projects were analyzed to determine the average operational time for S/S projects
compared to other technologies. For this analysis, operational time was defined as the period from when
operations began (following design and installation) to the time the project was determined to have been
completed by the project manager. Assuming treatment of 1,000 cubic yards of waste, the average operational
time for S/S projects was 1.1 months. For the same volume of waste, the average operational time was
-------
_O
Exhibit 12: Superfund Remedial Actions: Site Types for Solidification/Stabilization
Site Type
approximately 0.75 months for thermal desorption, I month for incineration (on site), 2.5 months for soil vapor
extraction, 3 months for land treatment, 3.8 months for composting, and 5.8 months for soil washing.
Post Cure Testing and Performancee
The performance of S/S at Superfund remedial sites often is measured after the solidified material has
cured. As shown in Exhibit 13, post cure testing was performed for 67 percent of the S/S projects. Exhibit 14
lists the types of post cure tests used for S/S projects, which include; (I) physical tests - to provide information
about the physical characteristics of the treated waste, such as its moisture content or strength; and (2)
chemical tests - to measure the potential of a stabilized waste to release contaminants to the environment; to
define the composition of the waste and assess the performance of the binder. The most common post cure
tests used were the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test and the unconfined compressive
strength (DCS) test.
Available performance data for treatment of metals by S/S from completed projects indicated that
concentrations of metals before treatment
typically ranged from 50 mg/kg to 70,000
mg/kg, with concentrations as high as
424,000 mg/kg for lead and 170,000 mg/kg
for cadmium. In general, post-treatment
concentrations of metals met the RCRA
TCLP standards.
Performance data for completed S/S
projects where organics had been treated
were limited. Typical organics treated by
S/S at Superfund sites included
trichloroethene, benzene, methylene
chloride, pentachlorophenol,
Exhibit 13: Percentage of Completed S/S Projects
Conducting Post Cure Testing
Total Number of Projects = 102
Post Cure Testing
Not Conducted or
No Information
Available (34)
33%
Post Cure Testing
Conducted (68)
67%
-------
Exhibit 14: Type of Post Cure Testing Used for S/S Projects
Total Number of Projects = 66
u
6s)
_O
E
Type of Test
A project may use more than one type of test. ANSI 16.1 is the American Nuclear Society test 16.1 which is a leaching test.
Synthetic precipitation leaching procedure.
polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides (dieldrin,
endrin, isodrin, and aldrin), and polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs). Concentrations of contaminants before treatment
typcially ranged from about 100 mg/kg to 1,100 mg/kg
(PCBs).
While only limited post-treatment performance data were
available for organic wastes, the data indicated that S/S met
the established performance goals for several projects. For
example, at the American Creosote, a wood preserving site
in Tennessee, soils were contaminated with wood preserving
compounds such as pentachlorophenol, benzo(a)pyrene,
dibenz(a,h) anthracene, and dioxin. As shown in Exhibit 15,
S/S met the cleanup goals for each of these constituents.
Limited data are available on long-term performance of S/S at Superfund sites. The long-term environment and
conditions to which the solidified waste is exposed can affect the stability of the treated waste. For example,
studies (Klich et a/) have shown that cement-based stabilized wastes are vulnerable to the same physical and
chemical degradation processes as concrete and other cement-based materials (that is, have the potential to
disintegrate over a period of 50 to 100 years).
Exhibit 15: S/S Performance at American
Creosote, TN
Contaminant Cleanup Goal*
Pentachlorophenol <200^/g/l
Benzo(a)pyrene < 1 0 ji/g/l
Dibenz(a,h) anthracene <4.4^g/l
Dioxin <30ppq**
* Results reported as concentration of SPLP
**ppq = parts per quintillion
Result
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
extract
Cost Data
Information about the cost of using S/S to treat wastes at Superfund remedial sites was available for 29
completed projects. Total costs for S/S projects ranged from $75,000 to $16 million including the cost of
excavation (if ex s/tu), treatment, and disposal (if ex s/tu). The cost per cubic yard treated ranged from $8 to
approximately $1,200 per cubic yard. The average cost per cubic yard for these projects was $264, including
two projects with relatively high costs (approximately $1,200 per cubic yard). Excluding those two projects, the
average cost per cubic yard was $194.
-------
Dispose I/Long Term Management Options
The waste forms produced by ex situ S/S processes
are either disposed of off-site or disposed of on-site
(with or without capping). The waste products of in situ
S/S processes are left in place at the site (i.e., disposed of
on-site) with or without capping. For completed S/S
projects at Superfund remedial sites, on-site disposal of
waste forms produced by ex situ processes and capping
were used for the majority of projects, as shown in
Exhibit 16.
:" Additional Information
The following sources provide additional
information about S/S processes in general and their use
at Superfund sites:
EPA's Solidification/Stabilization Resource Guide (EPA/ 542-
B-99-002) contains summaries of information from 125
references, including technical, guidance and policy
documents, and provides an easy-to-use matrix that
cross-references resources by technology type, medium,
and contaminant to help readers easily locate resources
that meet their specific needs.
Exhibit 16: Long Term Management Options for
S/S Projects
Capping
On-Site
Disposal
Off-Site
Disposal
Long Term Management Option*
A project may implement more than one option.; on-site disposal is for wastes
from ex situ processes.
EPA's Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status
Report (ninth edition) includes information about Superfund remedial action sites at which S/S projects are being
or have been implemented.
EPA's REACH IT system, , provides detailed data, in a searchable system, about specific
applications of S/S at Superfund sites, as well as a wide range of information about technologies, technology
vendors, and other technology applications.
EPA's Updating Remedy Decisions at Select Superfund Sites Summary Report, FY 1996 and FY 1997 contains
additional information about remedy changes that affected S/S projects.
The Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR) site includes case studies of S/S applications, available at
.
References
EPA. 1999. Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (ninth edition) (EPA-542-R99-OOI). April.
EPA. 1997. Innovative Site Remediation Technology, Solidification/Stabilization. Design & Application, Volume 4. (EPA
542-B-97-007)
Klich, I., B. Batchelor, LP. Wilding, LR. Press. 1999. Mineralogical alterations that affect the durability and metals
containment of aged solidified and stabilized wastes. Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 29.
Means, Jeffery et al. 1995. The Application of Solidification/Stabilization to Waste Materials. Lewis Publishers.
Portland Cement Association. 1991. Solidification and Stabilization of Waste Using Portland Cement.
Wiles, C.C. 1987. A Review of Solidification/Stabilization Technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 14:5-21.
-------
Appendix A
List of Superfund Remedial Sites Using Solidification/Stabilization
Region
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant)And Co., Inc.
PSC Resources
Chemical Control
NL Industries, Inc.
WaldickAerospace Devices, Inc.
Asbestos Dump - NewVernon Road
and White Bridge Road Cleanup
Nascolite Corp. - OU 2
American Cyanamid Co. - Group I
Impoundments (11, 13, 19, And 24)
NL Industries, Inc. -OU1
State
MA
MA
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
ROD
Year
1989
1992
1987
1991
1991
1991
1991
1993
1994
Contaminants
Arsenic
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Benzene
Trans 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Arsenic
Lead
Zinc
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
1,1-Dichloroethane
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Pesticides
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Arsenic
Lead
Cadmium
Chromium
Cadmium
Asbestos
Lead
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Zinc
Lead
Acetone
Chromium
Xylene
Copper
Nickel
Naphthalene
Chlorobenzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Cadmium
Lead
Project
Status
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Operational
Design
Project Manager
Dave Lederer
617-573-9665
Don Mcelroy
617-223-5571
Nigel Robinson
212-637-4394
Joseph Gowers
212-637-4413
DanielWeissman
212-637-4384
Maryanne Rosa
212-637-4407
FarnazSaghafi
212-637-4408
James Haklar
212-637-4414
Joseph Gowers
212-637-4413
A-1
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name
Caldwell Trucking -Amendment
American Cyanamid Co. - Group II
Impoundments (15, 16, 17, And 18)
Cosden Chemical Coatings
Marathon Battery Corp. -Areas I, II, And II
YorkONCo.-OU1
Facet Enterprises
Preferred Plating Corp. - OU 2
FMC Corp. (Dublin Road)
York Oil Co. -OU 02
State
NJ
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
ROD
Year
1995
1996
1998
1986
1988
1992
1992
1993
1998
Contaminants
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Lead
Cadmium
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
Chloroform
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Naphthalene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Toluene
Zinc
2-Methylnaphthalene
Nickel
Benzo(a)anthracene
Copper
Nitrosodiphenylamine
Acetone
Ethylbenzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chromium
Xylene
Lead
Anthracene
Chlorobenzene
Benzene
Beryllium
Lead
Chromium
Cobalt
Nickel
Cadmium
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPH)
Cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Cadmium
Cadmium
Chromium
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane
(ODD)
Zinc
Mercury
Lead
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene
(DDE)
Copper
Arsenic
Alpha BHC
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Project
Status
Completed
Predesign
Predesign
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Project Manager
Richard Robinson
212-637-4371
James Haklar
212-637-4414
Edward Finnerty
212-637-4367
Pam Tames
212-637-4255
Joel Singerman
212-637-4258
Isabel Rodrigues
212-637-4248
Janet Cappelli
212-637-4270
Kevin Lynch
212-637-4287
Joel Singerman
212-637-4258
A-2
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Site Name
Bruin Lagoon
HebelkaAuto Salvage Yard
Douglassville Disposal
Craig Farm Drum
LetterkennyArmy Depot (SE Area) -
Former Solvent Disposal Lagoon/Earthen
Whitmoyer Laboratories - OU 2
(Bldg Structures)
Eastern Diversified Metals
Whitmoyer Laboratories - OU 3
Paoli Rail Yard
Tonolli Corp.
C&D Recycling
Hunterstown Road
Jacks Creek/Sitkin SmeltingAnd Refining
Whitmoyer Laboratories - OU 04 and OU 5
M.W. Manufacturing
C&R Battery Co., Inc.
First Piedmont Rock Quarry (Route 719)
RhinehartTire Fire Dump
Abex Corporation OU 1 - Inner FocusArea
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
State
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WV
ROD
Year
1982
1989
1989
1989
1991
1991
1991
1991
1992
1992
1992
1993
1997
1998
1998
1990
1991
1992
1992
1989
Lead
Contaminants
Lead
SulfuricAcid
Sulfur
Hydrogen Sulfide
Lead
Chromium
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Chromium
Lead
Benzene
Resorcinol
Phenol
Lead
Arsenic
Tar
Lead
Arsenic
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Cadmium
Arsenic
Copper
Lead
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Chromium
Lead
Lead
Arsenic
Lead
Lead
Lead
Arsenic
Cadmium
Zinc
Lead
Arsenic
Project
Status
Completed
Completed
Design
Completed
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Design
Design
Being Installec
Completed
Design
Design
Completed
Design
Completed
Operational
Completed
Operational
Predesign
Project Manager
BhupendraKhona
215-814-3213
Frederick N. Macmillan
215-814-3201
Victor J.Janosik
215-814-3217
Garth Connor
215-814-3209
Stacie Driscoll
215-566-3368
Christopher J. Corbett
215-814-3220
Steven J. Donohue
215-566-3215
Christopher J. Corbett
215-814-3220
Frances Costanzi
215-566-3196
Steven J. Donohue
215-566-3215
Joseph Mcdowell
215-566-3192
John Banks
215-814-3214
Garth Connor
215-814-3209
Christopher J. Corbett
215-814-3220
BhupendraKhona
215-814-3213
Ronnie M. Davis
215-814-3230
David lacono
215-814-3231
Russell H. Fish
215-566-3226
David lacono
215-814-3231
Melissa Whittington
215-566-3235
A-3
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name
Mowbray Engineering
Interstate Lead Co.
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant, Area B,
Study Areas 5, 10, 16, 19, OU6
AlabamaArmy Ammunition Plant, OU 5
Davie Landfill
Pepper Steel &Alloys, Inc.
Sapp Battery Salvage
Kassauf-Kimerling Battery Disposal -
OU1 (Landfill Wastes)
Kassauf-Kimerling Battery - Wetlands Soils
Zellwood Soil Contamination - OU 1
(Amendment)
Yellow Water Road Dump
Schuylkill Metal
62nd Street Dump
Zellwood Soil Contamination - OU 1
(Amendment)
Yellow Water Road Dump
Cabot/Koppers - Koppers OU
Agri co Chemical
Whitehouse Oil Pits -Amendment
State
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
ROD
Year
1986
1991
1992
1997
1985
1986
1986
1989
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1990
1992
1992
Contaminants
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Lead
Lead
Lead
Chromium
Cadmium
Mercury
Arsenic
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Heavy metals
Cadmium
Antimony
Lead
Chromium
Battery casings
Lead
Lead
Battery casings
Chlordane
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Chromium
Antimony
Cadmium
Lead
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Lead
Chromium
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Chromium
Arsenic
Arsenic
Lead
Fluoride
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Cadmium
Antimony
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Project
Status
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Completed
Design
Project Manager
Humberto Guzman
404-562-8942
AstridAponte
404-562-8932
Dann Spariosu
404-562-8552
Dann Spariosu
404-562-8552
Bill Denman
404-562-8939
John Zimmerman
404-562-8936
David Lloyd
404-562-8917
Maxwell Kimpson
404-562-8941
Maxwell Kimpson
404-562-8941
Julie Santiago
404-562-8948
David Lloyd
404-562-8917
Galo Jackson
404-562-8937
Maxwell Kimpson
404-562-8941
Julie Santiago
404-562-8948
David Lloyd
404-562-8917
John Blanchard
404-562-8934
Ken Lucas
404-562-8953
RandaChichakli
404-562-8907
A-4
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Site Name
Peak Oil/Bay Drum - OU 3
Peak Oil/Bay Drum -OU1
Jacksonville Naval Air Station -
OU2PSCs2,41,and43
Florida Steel Corp. - OU 2
Jacksonville Naval Air Station -
OU2PSC42
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpon Springs)
-OU01
Robins Air Force Base - Sludge Lagoon
Hercules 009 Landfill
Cedartown Industries, Inc.
Maxey Flats Nuclear Disposal
Flowood Site
Celanese - OU 2
Carolina Transformer Co.
JFD Electronics/Channel Master
Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination -
Amendment
State
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
KY
MS
NC
NC
NC
NC
ROD
Year
1993
1993
1994
1994
1995
1998
1991
1993
1993
1991
1988
1989
1991
1992
1993
Contaminants
Chromium
Lead
Zinc
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Nickel
Chromium
Cadmium
Arsenic
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Cadmium
Nickel
Lead
Chromium
Silver
Antimony
Carcinogenic PAHs
Phosphorus
Thallium
Radium-226
Beryllium
Arsenic
Lead
Cadmium
Toxaphene
Lead
Xylene
Radioactive metals
Tritium
Benzene
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Lead
Ethyleneglycol
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Chromium
Nickel
Antimony
Lead
Project
Status
Design
Design
Completed
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Completed
Completed
Completed
Being Installed
Completed
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Design
Completed
Project Manager
Randall Chaffins
404-562-8929
Randall Chaffins
404-562-8929
Martha Berry
404-562-8533
Bill Denman
404-562-8939
Martha Berry
404-562-8533
John Blanchard
404-562-8934
Elizabeth Wilde
404-562-8528
Bill Downs
912-926-1197
Annie Godfrey
404-562-8919
Annie Godfrey
404-562-8919
Antonio Deangelo
404-562-8826
John Mcqueen
404-562-8913
Ken Mallary
404-562-8802
Luis Flores
404-562-8807
Ken Mallary
404-562-8802
David Mattison
919-733-2801
Giezelle Bennett
404-562-8824
A-5
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name
North Carolina State University -
Lot 86, FarmUnit#1
Palmetto Wood Preserving
Independent Nail Co.
Golden Strip Septic Tank Service
Geiger (C&M Oil) -Amendment
Savannah River (Usdoe) - Old F-Area
Seepage Basin, Srs Building Number
904-49g
Savannah River (Usdoe) - L-Area Oil And
Chemical BasinAnd L-AreaAcid/
Caustic Basin
Shuronlnc-OU01
Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 3,
Pond Waste Management Project
Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 40,
Burial Complex 4
Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) - OU 14,
Surface Impoundments
Velsicol Chemical
Sangamo Electric Dump/Crab Orchard
National Wildlife Refuge - PCBAreas OU
Sangamo Electric Dump/Crab Orchard
National Wildlife Refuge - MetalsAreas OU
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.
Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.
Midcol
State
NC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
TN
TN
TN
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
ROD
Year
1996
1987
1987
1991
1993
1997
1997
1998
1991
1996
1997
1988
1990
1990
1991
1991
1989
Contaminants
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Heavy metals
Solvents
Radioactive metals
Chromium
Arsenic
Chromium
Cyanide
Cadmium
Zinc
Nickel
Cadmium
Lead
Chromium
Toluene
Mercury
Cesium-137
Uranium
Chromium
Radioactive metals
Tritium
Lead
Radioactive metals
Strontium
Cesium-137
Plutonium
Radioactive metals
Strontium
Phenol
Benzene
Lead
Cadmium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Lead
Chromium
Arsenic
Chromium
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Nickel
Lead
Copper
Cyanide
Project
Status
Design
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Design
Being Installec
Predesign
Completed
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Project Manager
Michael Townsend
404-562-8813
Al Cherry
404-562-8828
Terry Tanner
404-562-8797
Craig Zeller
404-562-8827
Sheri Panabaker
404-562-8810
Tania Smith
803-725-8131
Les Germany
803-725-8033
Ralph O. Howard Jr.
404-562-8829
Ed Carreras
404-562-8509
Ed Carreras
404-562-8509
Ed Carreras
404-562-8509
Eric Runkel
217-782-0451
Nanjunda Gowda
312-353-9236
Nanjunda Gowda
312-353-9236
David Linnear
312-886-1841
David Linnear
312-886-1841
Richard Boice
312-886-4740
A-6
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name
Midcoll
Continental Steel Corp. - OU 02
Forest Waste Products
Liquid Disposal, Inc.
Auto Ion Chemicals
Springfield Township Dump-90ROD
Carter Industrials, Inc.
Peerless Plating
Organic Chemicals, Inc. - OU 2
Springfield Township Dump - OU 01
State
IN
IN
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
ROD
Year
1989
1998
1986
1987
1989
1990
1991
1992
1997
1998
Contaminants
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Nickel
Lead
Chromium
Lead
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Cadmium
Chromium
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Lead
Cadmium
Barium
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
1,1-Dichloroethane
Vinyl chloride
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Lead
Nickel
Chromium
Silver
Cadmium
Mercury
Barium
Arsenic
Copper
Cyanide
Arsenic
Lead
Lead
Lead
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Lead
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Dieldrin
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
(TCDD)
Benzo(a)anthracene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Beryllium
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Lead
Barium
Arsenic
Project
Status
Predesign
Predesign
Completed
Completed
Completed
Design
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Predesign
Project Manager
Richard Boice
312-886-4740
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
Elizabeth Reiner
312-353-6576
Leah Evison
312-886-4696
Michael Mcateer
312-886-4663
Tim Penderville
312-886-5122
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Michael Ribordy
312-886-4592
Thomas Williams
312-886-6157
Tim Penderville
312-886-5122
A-7
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
Site Name
St. Louis River/lntertake/Duluth Tar Site -
Wire Mill PondAndOUJ
Waite Park Wells - OUs 1 , 2, & 3
MacgillisAnd Gibbs/Bell LumberAnd Pole
-OUS
NewBrighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP
(USArmy)-OU07
Ormet Corporation
Fernald Environmental Management
Project, Formerly The Feed Materials
Production Center, OU 5
United Scrap Lead Company
Northern Engraving Corporation -
Sludge Lagoon
Oconomowoc Electroplating
N.W. Mauthe Site
GurleyPit
Mid-South Wood Products
Industrial Waste Control
State
MN
MN
MN
MN
OH
OH
OH
Wl
Wl
Wl
AR
AR
AR
ROD
Year
1990
1994
1994
1997
1994
1996
1997
1987
1990
1994
1987
1987
1988
Contaminants
Coal tar
Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs)
Lead
Arsenic
Chromium
Cadmium
Antimony
Trichloroethene
Lead
Copper
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Uranium
Lead
Arsenic
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Nickel
Fluoride
Lead
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Chromium
Chromium
Copper
Silver
Zinc
Cadmium
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Zinc
Barium
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Copper
Arsenic
Copper chromated arsenic (CCA)
Chromium
Creosote
Xylene
Lead
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Ethylbenzene
Chromium
Project
Status
Completed
Operational
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Project Manager
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
BrendaWinkler
651-296-7813
BrendaWinkler
651-296-7813
Darryl Owens
312-886-7089
Thomas Barounis
312-353-5577
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
James Saric
312-886-0992
John O'Grady
312-886-1477
RobertWhippo
312-886-4759
Thomas Williams
312-886-6157
Jon Peterson
312-353-1264
Ernest R. Franke
214-665-8521
Shawn Ghose
214-665-6782
Glenn Celerier
214-665-8523
Shawn Ghose
214-665-6782
A-8
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Site Name
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
South 8th Street Landfill - OU 1
Cleve Reber
Gulf Coast Vacuum Services -OU 1
Pab Oil & Chemical Services, Inc.
Cimarron Mining Corp.
Cal West Metals
Sand Springs Petrochemical Complex
Fourth StreetAbandoned Refinery
Oklahoma Refining Co.
Double Eagle Refinery Co.
Bio-Ecology Systems, Inc.
French Limited
State
AR
AR
AR
LA
LA
LA
NM
NM
OK
OK
OK
OK
IX
IX
ROD
Year
1990
1990
1998
1987
1992
1993
1991
1992
1987
1992
1992
1992
1984
1988
Contaminants
Dioxin
Dieldrin
Lead
Herbicides
Herbicides
Lead
Dioxin
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Barium
Cadmium
Lead
Organics
Nickel
Arsenic
Chromium
Mercury
Benzene
Barium
Arsenic
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Arsenic
Barium
Lead
Lead
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
1 ,1-Dichloroethylene (DCE)
Mineral acids
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Lead
Sulfuricacid
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Arsenic
Lead
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Acids
Cyanide
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Toluene
Naphthalene
Arsenic
Benzene
Lead
Methylene chloride
Arsenic
Project
Status
Completed
Completed
Being Installed
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Project Manager
KathleenAisling
214-665-8509
KathleenAisling
214-665-8509
PhillipAllen
214-665-8516
BartCanellas
214-665-6662
KathleenAisling
214-665-8509
Caroline Ziegler
214-665-2178
Tetra Sanchez
214-665-6686
Tetra Sanchez
214-665-6686
Shawn Ghose
214-665-6782
Carlos Sanchez
214-665-8507
Earl Hendrick
214-665-8519
Kelly Dixon
405-702-5141
PhillipAllen
214-665-8516
Olivia Balandran
214-665-6584
Ernest R. Franke
214-665-8521
Ernest R. Franke
214-665-8521
A-9
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
Site Name
Pesses Chemical Co.
Vogel Paint& Wax
Mid-America Tanning
Shaw Avenue Dump
El Dupont De Nemours & Co. Inc.
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant- OU 01
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USDOE)
Former Weldon Spring Ordnance Works -
OU 1,SoilsAnd Pipeline
Oronogo - Duenweg Mining Bell Site -
OU2And3
Hastings Groundwater Contamination -
Hastings East Industrial Park Surface
Soils, Former Naval Ammunition Depot
Lockheed/Martin (DenverAerospace)
Denver Radium Site - OU 8
BroderickWood Products- OU 1
(Impoundment Sludges)
Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE) - OU 4,
IndustrialAreas
State
TX
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
MO
MO
MO
NE
CO
CO
CO
CO
ROD
Year
1989
1989
1991
1991
1991
1998
1993
1996
1996
1990
1990
1992
1992
1992
Contaminants
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Lead
Chromium
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Arsenic
Cadmium
Selenium
Lead
Chromium
Lead
Radium-226
Thorium
Uranium
Heavy metals
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Cadmium
Lead
Chromium
Arsenic
Lead
Arsenic
Selenium
Radium-226
Lead
Uranium
Thorium
Cadmium
Arsenic
Lead
Plutonium
Project
Status
Completed
Completed
Being Installec
Completed
Completed
Operational
Being Installec
Designed/
Not Installed
Predesign
Completed
Design
Completed
Completed
Completed
Project Manager
Earl Hendrick
214-665-8519
Bob Drustrup
515-281-8900
Jim Colbert
913-551-7489
Bob Stewart
913-551-7654
Paul Roemerman
913-551-7694
Nancy Swyers
913-551-7703
Sharon Lehn
402-221-7768
Steve Mccracken
314-441-8978
GlenfordA. Newtown
Jr. 314-441-8978
Tom Lorenz
913-551-7292
MarkDoolan
913-551-7169
Ronald King
913-551-7568
George Dancik
303-312-6206
Rebecca Thomas
303-312-6552
Armando Saenz
303-312-6559
Steve Laudemann
303-692-3462
William Fraser
303-312-6257
Steve Gunderson
303-692-3367
A-IO
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
Site Name
Rocky Mountain Arsenal - Onpost OU,
Former Basin F
Rocky Mountain Arsenal - Onpost OU,
Buried M-1 Pits
Anaconda Co. Smelter- Flue Dust
Portland Cement (Kiln Dust#2 ) -
OU 2, Chromium Bearing Bricks And
Contaminated Soils
Apache Powder Co.
Tucson InternationalAirportArea -
Site 4, 5, 6
Selma Pressure Treating
Rhone-Poulenc/Zoecon
Sacramento Army Depot
MatherAir Force Base - OU 04 (86&S7)
J.H. Baxter
Arctic Surplus
Standard SteelAnd Metal Salvage Yard,
(USDOT)
Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling
State
CO
CO
MT
UT
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
AK
AK
ID
ROD
Year
1996
1996
1991
1992
1994
1998
1988
1992
1993
1998
1998
1995
1996
1988
Contaminants
Arsenic
Dieldrin
Isodrin
Endrin
Chloroaceticacid
DCPD
Aldrin
Arsenic
Mercury
Aldrin
Cadmium
Isodrin
Dieldrin
Cadmium
Arsenic
Lead
Chromium
Lead
Perchlorate
Chromium
Cadmium
Pentachlorophenol (PCP)
Dioxin
Copper
Chromium
Arsenic
Arsenic
Selenium
Lead
Cadmium
Lead
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Arsenic
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Project
Status
Design
Completed
Completed
Predesign
Operational
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Designed/
Not Installed
Predesign
Completed
Completed
Project Manager
Kerry Guy
303-312-7288
Kerry Guy
303-312-7288
Charles Coleman
406-441-1150
Jim Christiansen
303-312-6748
Bob O'Brien
801-536-4166
Andria Benner
415-744-2361
Sean Hogan
415-744-2334
Michelle Lau
415-744-2227
Rose Marie Caraway
415-744-2231
Xaun-MaiTran
415-744-2386
Kathleen Salyer
415-744-2214
Travis Cain
415-744-2341
Beatriz Bofill
415-744-2235
Neil Thompson
206-553-7177
Christopher Cora
206-553-1148
Neil Thompson
206-553-7177
A-1
continued on next page
-------
Appendix A (continued)
Region
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Site Name
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory -
Power Burst Facility, OU 1 3
Gould, Inc.
Teledyne Wan Chang
Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - OU 1
Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - OU 4
Umatilla Chemical Depot (Lagoons) - OU 6
Commencement Bay, Nearshore/Tideflats
- OU 3, Tacoma Tar Pits
Pacific CarAnd Foundry
Commencement Bay, South Tacoma Field
Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor -West Harbor OU
(Amendment)
State
ID
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
WA
WA
WA
WA
ROD
Year
1995
1988
1990
1993
1994
1994
1988
1992
1994
1996
Contaminants
Cesium
Chromium
Lead
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Radium sludge
Thorium
Uranium
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Heavy metals
Lead
Lead
Lead
Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine
(HMX)
Cadmium
Barium
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT)
RDX
Trinitrobenzene (TNB)
Cadmium
Arsenic
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Acids
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Diesel fuel
Chromium
Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)
Lead
Arsenic
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Lead
Copper
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Arsenic
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Project
Status
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Operational
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Project Manager
Keith A. Rose
206-553-7721
Allan Jines
208-526-7524
Chip Humphrey
503-326-2678
Kevin Rochlin
206-553-2106
Harry D. Craig
503-326-3689
Harry D. Craig
503-326-3689
Harry D. Craig
503-326-3689
Lee Marshall
206-553-2723
David South
415-649-7200
Lynda Priddy
206-553-1987
Bob Butler
425-468-7435
CamiGrandinetti
206-553-8696
Ellen Hale
206-553-1215
A-I2
-------
S
UJ
Environmen
of
Technology
Washington
o
o
o
Of
eg
HO
UJ
------- |