United States Office of Research and EPA-600/R-01-056b
Environmental Protection Development July 2001
Agency Washington, DC 20460
&EPA Environmental
Impacts
of the Use of
Orimulsion®
Report to Congress
on Phase 1 of the
Orimulsion® Technology
Assessment Program
Volume 2: Appendices B-H
-------
Foreword
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with
protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national
environmental lavfs, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a
compatible balan
3e between human activities and the ability of natural systems to
support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program is providing
data and technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a
science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely,
understand how pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks
in the future.
The Natioral Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) is the Agency's
center for investigation of technological and management approaches for preventing
and reducing risks from pollution that threaten human health and the environment. The
focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods and their cost-effectiveness
for prevention and control of pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources;
protection of water quality in public water systems; remediation of contaminated sites,
sediments and ground water; prevention and control of indoor air pollution; and
restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with both public and private sector
partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate
emerging problems. NRMRL's research provides solutions to environmental problems
by: developing and promoting technologies that protect and improve the environment;
advancing scientific and engineering information to support regulatory and policy
decisions; and providing the technical support and information transfer to ensure
implementation of environmental regulations and strategies at the national, state, and
community levels.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic
long-term research plan. It is published and made available by EPA's Office of
Research and Development to assist the user community and to link researchers with
their clients.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been peer and administratively reviewed by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or
commercial prqducts does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
i
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/R-01-056b
July 2001
Environmental Impacts of the
Use of Orimulsion®
Report to Congress on
Phase 1 of the Orimulsion® Technology
Assessment Program
Volume 2. Appendices B-H
By
C. Andrew Miller, Kevin Dreher, Randall Wentsell, and Royal J. Nadeau
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
National Center for Environmental Assessment
Washington, DC 20460
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Environmental Response Team
Edison, NJ 08837
EPA Project Officer: C. Andrew Miller
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
Abstract
Orimulsion, a bitumen-in-water emulsion produced in Venezuela, was evaluated to provide a better
understanding of the potential environmental impacts associated with its use as a fuel. A series of
pilot-scale tests were conducted at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental
Research Center in Research Triangle Park, NC, to provide data on emissions of air pollutants from
the combustion of Orimulsion 100 (the original formulation), Orimulsion 400 (a new formulation
introduced in 1998), and a No. 6 (residual) fuel oil. These results, and results of full-scale tests
reported in the technical literature, were evaluated to determine the potential air pollutant emissions
and the ability of commercially available pollution control technologies to adequately reduce those
emissions. Emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2),
sulfur trioxide, particulate matter (PM), and organic and metal hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) were
measured from each of these three fuels to provide a comparison between the "new" fuel
(Orimulsion) and a fuel that has been commonly used in the U.S. (the No. 6 fuel oil). Results
indicate that CO, NOX, and PM emissions are likely to be nearly the same as those from the No. 6 fuel
oil, that SO 2 emissions can increase if the fuel sulfur content increases, that the particles generated by
Orimulsion 100 and 400 are likely to be smaller in diameter than those generated by No. 6 fuel oil,
and that HAPs are also likely to be similar to those from No. 6 fuel oil. Both the full-scale results
found in the literature and the pilot-scale results measured at EPA indicate that conventional air
pollution control technologies can effectively reduce emissions to very low levels, depending upon
the type of technology used and the desired emission levels. Because the bitumen in Orimulsion is
heavier than water and due to the presence of a surfactant in the fuel, spills of Orimulsion are likely to
be more difficult to contain and recover than are spills of heavy fuel oil, especially in fresh water.
Additional study is needed before adequate containment and response approaches can be developed.
Little, if any, work has been conducted by the fuel producer or the scientific community to address
the remaining spill-related issues.
-------
Preface
This report is the result of a request by the U.S. Congress to receive scientific information regarding
the potential environmental impacts of the use of Orimulsion as a fuel. In the second half of the
1990s, there was considerable interest on the part of electric utilities in using Orimulsion, which was
promoted as a low-cost fuel that could replace heavy fuel oil or coal. There were also many concerns
raised by the environmental community regarding the environmental impact associated with
switching to Orimulsion. In 1997, the U.S. Congress requested that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) conduct a study to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated
with the use of Orimulsion. EPA's Office of Research and Development provided funds to the
National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) to conduct this study, and a team of EPA
experts in air pollution control, spill response, health effects, and environmental assessment was
assembled to carry out the investigation. This report was prepared by EPA staff using data generated
at EPA facilities as well as data collected from the general literature.
In 1998, Bitumenes Orinoco (Bitor), the manufacturer of Orimulsion, changed the formulation of the
fuel. The original fuel, renamed Orimulsion 100, was replaced with a new formulation named
Orimulsion 400. Compared to the amount of information on Orimulsion 100, there is relatively little
data on the performance of Orimulsion 400. While this report provides as much data as possible on
the emissions and performance of Orimulsion 400, the bulk of the data are for the older formulation
(Orimulsion 100). Although Orimulsion 100 is no longer produced, the results presented here are
still believed to adequately describe the basic behavior of both formulations of Orimulsion. The key
question to be addressed in this study is, "Is Orimulsion significantly different from other fossil fuels,
and if so, how?" The differences between Orimulsion 100 and Orimulsion 400, as indicated both
from the available data and the information provided by the manufacturer, are substantially smaller
than the differences between Orimulsion and other fossil fuels. The report distinguishes between the
two formulations where appropriate, but uses the generic term "Orimulsion" where such distinction
is either unimportant or misleading. The recent reformulation is significant with respect to the
surfactant used (which will affect spill toxicity) and the use of a magnesium-based additive (which
will affect boiler tube deposition and particulate matter emissions). Other environmental issues
appear to be impacted only to a minor degree by the change in formulation.
The emphasis of this report is on generation and control of air pollutants from the combustion of
Orimulsion. Although there are other environmental issues associated with the use of Orimulsion,
particularly spills of the fuel into water, EPA and NRMRL were advised on several occasions that
questions related to air pollutant generation and control were the key unknowns associated with
understanding the environmental impact potential of Orimulsion. The initial step in EPA's research
activities was the convening of a workshop to discuss environmental issues related to Orimulsion use.
This workshop, held February 8, 1998, concluded that there was a lack of information on particle size
distribution and composition and on emissions and control of sulfur trioxide from Orimulsion
combustion. The workshop also concluded that enough data existed to allow a comparative risk
analysis for heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion, and therefore additional research in that area was not
immediately required. The workshop noted that a lack of data existed describing the behavior, fate,
and effects of Orimulsion spills in fresh water. However, the workshop concluded that investigations
into these areas should be the responsibility of Bitor in the event they sought to market the fuel to
users where spills into fresh water were possible. Considerable work has been conducted to quantify
behavior, fate, and effects of Orimulsion in saltwater environments under the oversight of the
International Orimulsion Working Group, of which Bitor is a member and the major source of
funding. Thus this report has as its focus the generation and control of air pollutants, although other
topics are also covered.
This focus was emphasized in the Orimulsion Technology Assessment Plan that was prepared to
guide EPA's research efforts. This plan was reviewed and approved, with modifying comments, by a
in
-------
panel of technical experts, mostly from outside the federal government. The only exception was one
member from the U.S. Coast Guard. The Plan was then reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
EPA responded to comments made by each of these organizations and revised the Plan, which was
approved by OMB on April 22, 1999.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory was the lead organization for the study, and was
chiefly responsible for preparation of Chapters 1-5 and 9-12. Robert E. Hall was the overall program
lead, and C. Andrew Miller was the lead author of these chapters. Kevin Dreher of the National
Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory prepared Chapter 6, on toxicity testing, with
substantial assistance from Adriana Grain. Chapter 7, on spills, was prepared with assistance from
Royal J. Nadeau of EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Randall Wentsel of the
National Center for Environmental Assessment prepared Chapter 8, on environmental assessment.
The conclusions stated in this report are scientific conclusions, and are not intended to provide
guidance relative to regulatory requirements that may or may not apply to the use of Orimulsion.
Acknowledgments
Many people contributed to the collection of data and preparation of this report. From EPA's Air
Pollution Prevention and Control Division, the following people provided notable input:
• Marc Calvi for preparation and analysis of SEM samples,
• Shirley Wasson for XRF analysis of PM samples, and
• Paul Groff, Richard Shores, and Nancy Adams for quality assurance support.
From ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller (under EPA contract 68-C-99-201), efforts of the following
people were critical to the completion of this project:
• Suh Lee, project lead,
• Charly King for sample collection and preparation,
• Christian Elmore and Daniel Janek for SMPS operation, and
• Dennis Tabor for analytical chemistry support.
The opportunity to observe full-scale operations at the Dalhousie and Asnaes Generating Stations was
also very useful, and we received considerable assistance from:
• Rod Eagles and Barry Irvine of New Brunswick Power, Dalhousie, New Brunswick, Canada,
• Kim Jonas, Niels Groth-Andersen, Thorkild Meyer, and Hans Christensen of SK Power,
Kalundborg, Denmark, and
• Morten Thellefsen Nielsen, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Many of the reports from which full-scale data were taken were provided by Nelson Garcia Tavel of
Bitor America, Jason Miles of Bitor Europe, and independent consultant Ken Olen.
IV
-------
Nomenclature and Acronyms
APCS air pollution control system
API American Petroleum Institute
APPCD Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
ARD Arizona road dust
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BALF bronchoalveolar fluid
bbl barrels, U.S. petroleum
BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylene, and xylenes
Btu British thermal unit
CAA Clean Air Act
CAAAs Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CARB California Air Resources Board
CE Combustion Engineering
CEM continuous emission monitor
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
DAS data acquisition system
DQI data quality indicator
EDX energy dispersive x-ray
ENEL Italian Electricity Generating Board
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESP electrostatic precipitator
FETC U.S. Department of Energy's Federal Energy Technology Center
FGD flue gas desulfurization
FPL Florida Power & Light Company
GIS geographical information systems
HAP hazardous air pollutant
HEPA high efficiency particulate air
HFO heavy fuel oil
HQ health quotient
IOWG International Orimulsion Working Group
IURE inhalation unit risk estimate
LAPIO low API oil
LDH lactate dehydrogenase
LNB low NOX burner
LOEC lowest observable effects concentration
LOEL lowest observed effect level
LOI loss on ignition
MACS miniature acid-condensation system
MDL method detection limit
MEI maximum exposed individual
MIR maximum individual risk
NCEA National Center for Environmental Assessment
NHEERL National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory
NO nitric oxide
NOEC no observable effects concentration
NOX nitrogen oxides
NRC National Research Council
-------
Nomenclature and Acronyms (Continued)
NRMRL National Risk Management Research Laboratory
NSPS New Source Performance Standard
O2 oxygen
OERR Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
OFA overfire air
ORD Office of Research and Development
ORI 100 Orimulsion 100
ORI 400 Orimulsion 400
OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
OTAP Orimulsion Technology Assessment Plan
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PBS Package Boiler Simulator
PC pulverized coal
PDVSA Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A.
PEA performance evaluation audit
PM particulate matter
PM2.5 particulate matter smaller than 2.5 (am in aerodynamic diameter
PM10 particulate matter smaller than 10 (am in aerodynamic diameter
ppm parts per million
QA quality assurance
QAPP quality assurance project plan
QC quality control
ROFA 6 residual oil fly ash (No. 6 fuel oil)
RSD relative standard deviation
SASS source assessment sampling system
SCR selective catalytic reduction
SEM scanning electron microscope
SMPS scanning mobility particle sizer
SNCR selective noncatalytic reduction
SO2 sulfur dioxide
SO3 sulfur trioxide
SVOC semivolatile organic compound
TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching potential
THC total hydrocarbon
TSA technical systems audit
VOC volatile organic compound
VOST volatile organic sampling train
WLFO wet limestone forced oxidation
XRF X-ray fluorescence
VI
-------
Contents
Volume 1
Page
Abstract ii
Preface iii
Acknowledgments iv
Nomenclature and Acronyms v
List of Figures xiii
List of Tables xvi
Executive Summary ES-1
Conclusions of the Report ES-1
Recommendations of the Report ES-1
Purpose and Approach ES-2
Background ES-3
Air Emissions ES-3
Data from EPA Pilot-Scale Tests ES-3
Toxicity Testing ES-4
Spills ES-5
Risk Assessment ES-5
Potential Use of Orimulsion ES-6
1. Introduction and Background
Background
Overview of Orimulsion and its Use
Air Emissions
Spills
Objective
Approach
Report Structure
-1
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-5
-6
2. Properties and Characteristics of Orimulsion 2-1
Background 2-1
Properties of Emulsified Fuels 2-1
Combustion Behavior 2-1
Impact on Boiler Efficiency 2-2
Fuel Handling 2-3
Properties of Orimulsion 2-3
Fuel Composition 2-4
Fuel Handling 2-4
Temperature 2-4
Shear 2-4
Contamination 2-6
Evaluating Environmental Issues Associated With Orimulsion Combustion 2-6
Air Emissions 2-7
Solid Residues 2-9
3. Review of Previous Orimulsion Combustion Research and Demonstration 3-1
Fundamental Studies 3-1
VII
-------
Contents (Continued)
Page
Pilot-Scale Testing 3-2
Combustion Performance 3-2
Burner Development 3-4
Trial Tests 3-4
Reburning Development 3-6
Air Pollution Control Equipment Evaluation 3-6
Full-Scale Testing and Operation 3-7
Plants Currently Operating 3-7
New Brunswick Power Dalhousie Generating Station 3-8
Dalhousie Demonstration Tests 3-8
Conversion to Permanent Orimulsion Operation 3-11
Use of Orimulsion 400 3-12
Kansai Electric Power Company Osaka No. 4 3-14
Kashima-Kita Electric Power Company 3-14
SK Energy Asnaes Unit 5 3-14
Orimulsion 100 Use at Asnaes 3-14
Orimulsion 400 Use at Asnaes 3-18
ENEL Brindisi Sud Units 1 and 2 and Fiume Santo Plant 3-19
Past Operations 3-20
Florida Power & Light Company Sanford Plant 3-20
PowerGen Ince and Richborough 3-21
Energie-Versorgung Schwaben Marbach III Power Plant 3-23
Planned Operations 3-23
Reburning Development 3-24
Engineering Studies 3-25
Feasibility Studies 3-26
Pollution Control Equipment Analyses 3-27
Other Work 3-27
Diesel Engines 3-27
Gasification 3-27
Briquetting of Coal Fines 3-27
Cement Kilns 3-28
Desulfurization 3-28
Summary of Previous Work 3-28
Operational Issues 3-28
Fuel Handling and Atomization 3-28
Excess O2 3-28
Boiler Efficiency 3-28
Boiler Fouling 3-29
Air Emissions 3-29
CO 3-29
NOX 3-29
SO2 and SO3 3-30
PM 3-31
Hazardous Air Pollutants and Metals 3-31
CO2 3-32
Air Pollution Control 3-34
NOX Control 3-34
Low NOX Burners 3-34
Reburning 3-34
Selective Catalytic Reduction 3-34
Vlll
-------
Contents (Continued)
Page
SO2 and SO3 Control 3-35
PM Control 3-35
ESPs 3-35
Baghouses 3-35
Solid Residue Disposal 3-36
4. EPA Pilot-Scale Experimental Approach and Equipment 4-1
Approach 4-1
Test Equipment 4-1
Package Boiler Simulator 4-1
Fuel Supply System 4-2
Instrumentation 4-2
Continuous Emission Monitors 4-3
Data Acquisition System 4-4
Dilution Sampling System 4-5
Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer 4-6
Scanning Electron Microscope 4-7
Sampling Methods 4-7
EPA Methods 5 and 29 4-7
EPA Methods 0010 and 0030 4-8
Modified CARB Method 501 4-8
5. EPA Pilot-Scale Test Results 5-
Test Conditions 5 -
Fuel Composition 5-
O2 5-
Fuel Feed 5-
Emission Measurement Results 5-3
CO 5-3
NOX 5-5
SO2and SO3 5-5
PM 5-7
Organic HAPs 5-10
Volatile Organic Compounds 5-10
Semivolatile Organic Compounds 5-11
Metals 5-14
Emission Factors 5-18
Scanning Electron Micrographs 5-21
6. Physicochemical Properties and Acute Pulmonary Toxicity of Orimulsion Fly Ash 6-1
Objective 6-1
Oil Fly Ash Production and Collection 6-1
Reference Particle 6-1
Physicochemical Properties of Oil Fly Ash Samples and Arizona Road Dust 6-1
Acute Pulmonary Toxicity of Oil Fly Ash and Arizona Road Dust Samples 6-2
Oil Fly Ash Health Effects Commentary 6-5
7. Spills 7-1
Introduction 7-1
Background 7-1
IX
-------
Contents (Continued)
Page
Reported Orimulsion Spill Studies 7-4
Saltwater Spills 7-5
Freshwater Spills 7-5
Data Gaps 7-7
8. Environmental Risk Assessment 8-1
Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment Evaluation 8-1
Introduction 8-1
Summary of Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment Reports 8-2
Scope of Harwell Work 8-2
Approach of Harwell Work 8-2
Conclusions of Harwell Work 8-2
Scientific Evaluation of the Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment
of Spills from No. 6 Fuel Oil and Orimulsion 100 8-3
Overview of Harwell Assessment 8-3
Assessment Methodologies 8-3
Portability of this Assessment to Other Sites 8-7
Fate and Transport Methods 8-8
Toxicity Test Methods 8-8
Suggested Improvements for the Tampa Bay Risk Assessment 8-9
Toxicology 8-9
Benthic Community 8-10
Modeling 8-10
Mitigation 8-10
Assessment of Risk from Air Emissions 8-10
Conclusions 8-12
9. Comparison of Orimulsion with Other Fossil Fuels 9-1
Fuel Properties 9-1
Coal 9-1
Fuel Oil 9-2
Natural Gas 9-3
Fuel Use 9-4
Coal 9-5
Fuel Oil 9-5
Natural Gas 9-8
Air Pollutant Emissions and Control 9-8
CO Emissions and Control 9-8
NOXEmissions and Control 9-9
SOX Emissions and Control 9-11
PM Emissions and Control 9-13
Hazardous Air Pollutants Emissions and Control 9-16
Transition Metals Emissions and Control 9-18
CO2 Emissions 9-18
Summary of Air Pollutant Emissions 9-19
10. Quality Assurance 10-1
-------
Contents (Continued)
Page
Data Reported in Literature 10-1
In-House Combustion Testing 10-1
Data Quality Indicator Goals 10-1
Calculation of DQI Values 10-3
Sampling Goals 10-3
Analytical Data Quality Indicators 10-3
Volatile Organic Compounds 10-3
Semivolatile Organic Compounds 10-4
Metals Analyses 10-9
Audits 10-10
Audit Summary 10-10
Findings and Observations 10-12
EPA Performance Evaluation and Systems Audits 10-12
Flue Gas Flow 10-12
Fuel Input Flow 10-13
CEM Calibrations 10-13
Other Discrepancies 10-13
ARCADIS Technical Systems Audit 10-14
Other Discrepancies 10-14
Data Limitations 10-14
QA Review of Sampling and Measurement Activities at Asnaes 10-15
Flue Gas Concentration Measurements 10-15
PM Sampling Program 10-16
Toxicity Testing 10-17
11. Conclusions and Recommendations 11-1
Responses to Questions of the Peer Panel 11-1
Further Conclusions 11-3
Orimulsion Properties 11-3
Air Pollutant Emissions 11-3
Air Pollution Control Technologies 11-3
Solid Waste Disposal 11-3
Toxicity 11-3
Spills 11-3
Ecological Risk 11-3
Potential for Orimulsion Use 11-4
Data Reported in the Literature 11-4
Recommendations 11-4
12. References 12-1
APPENDIX A. Conversion of English System to SI System Units A-l
Volume 2
APPENDIX B. Continuous Emission Monitoring Data for EPA Pilot Scale Tests B-l
APPENDIX C. Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Laboratory Reports C-l
-------
APPENDIX D. Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis Laboratory Reports D-l
APPENDIX E. Metal Analysis Laboratory Reports E-l
APPENDIX F. Orimulsion Spill References Cited by the NRC, U.S. Coast Guard,
and Environment Canada Reports F-l
APPENDIX G. Additional Ecological Risk Assessment Studies G-l
APPENDIX H. Comparative Risk Methodology Synopsis of Harwell et al. (1995) H-l
xn
-------
List of Figures
Volume 1
Page
1-1. Orinoco region of Venezuela 1-4
2-1. Types of instabilities in bitumen-in-water emulsions 2-6
3 -1. Emissions of CO, NOX, and PM measured during
pilot-scale tests of Orimulsion 100 combustion 3-3
3-2. F-jet and advanced F-jet atomizers used in Orimulsion combustion
tests at PowerGen's Power Technology Centre 3-5
3-3. Photograph of Dalhousie Generating Station, Dalhousie, New Brunswick, Canada .... 3-8
3 -4. Particle size distribution for PM emitted from the
combustion of heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 100 during
demonstration testing at NB Power Dalhousie Generating Station 3-10
3-5. Carbon in ash in PM emitted from the combustion of
heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 100 during demonstration testing
at NB Power Dalhousie Generating Station 3-11
3-6. CO as a function of stack O2 levels measured during
combustion testing of heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 100
at the NB Power Dalhousie Generating Station 3-12
3-7. Relationship between the acid dewpoint and SOj,
emissions measured during Orimulsion 100 demonstration
testing at the NB Power Dalhousie Generating Station 3-13
3-8. Relationship between stack and acid dewpoint
temperature for each day during Orimulsion 100
demonstration testing at NB Power Dalhousie Station 3-13
3-9. CO, NOX, and SO2 emissions at Kansai Electric Company Osaka No. 4 plant 3-15
3-10. Emissions of PM, unburned carbon, and SO3 at
Kansai Electric Company Osaka No. 4 plant 3-16
3-11. Particle size distribution for PM from the combustion of
Orimulsion 100 measured at SK Energy Asnaes Unit 5 3-17
3-12. NOX emission rates as a function of load measured during testing
of Orimulsion 100 at the Florida Power & Light Sanford Plant 3-21
3-13. Average PM emission rates as a function of test condition measured
during testing of Orimulsion 100 at the Florida Power & Light Sanford Plant 3-22
3-14. NOX emissions measured during the reburning demonstration at Hennepin Station . . 3-25
3-15. NOX emissions measured during the reburning demonstration
at Hennepin Station using natural gas and Orimulsion 100
as reburn fuel, as a function of % reburn fuel input 3-26
4-1. Schematic of Package Boiler Simulator 4-3
4-2. Schematic of fuel feed system for heavy fuel oil 4-4
Xlll
-------
List of Figures (Continued)
Page
4-3. Schematic of fuel feed system for Orimulsion 100 and Orimulsion 400 4-5
4-4. Schematic of continuous emission monitoring system 4-6
4-5. Schematic of high volume dilution sampling system 4-7
5-1. Average CO emissions from the three fuels tested 5-4
5-2. CO vs. O2 for selected runs with Orimulsion 100, Orimulsion 400, and No. 6 fuel oil . 5-4
5-3. Average NO emissions from the three fuels tested 5-5
5-4. NO vs. O2 for selected runs with Orimulsion 100, Orimulsion 400, and No. 6 fuel oil . 5-6
5-5. Average SO2 emissions as measured by CEM from the three fuels tested 5-6
5-6. Average PM emissions from the three fuels tested 5-8
5-7. Cascade impactor results for the three fuels tested 5-9
5-8. Scanning mobility particle sizing results for the three fuels tested 5-10
5-9. Average detected concentration of volatile organic compounds 5-13
5-10. Average detected emission factors of volatile organic compounds 5-14
5-11. Average detected concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds 5-16
5-12. Average detected emission factors of semivolatile organic compounds 5-16
5-13. Concentrations of metals measured in the flue gases of the three fuels 5-17
5-14. Scanning electron micrograph of untreated blank filter at 700x magnification 5-22
5-15. Scanning electron micrograph of untreated filter loaded with PM
from No. 6 fuel oil at 700x magnification 5-23
5-16. Scanning electron micrograph of untreated filter loaded with PM
from Orimulsion 100 at 700x magnification 5-23
5-17. Scanning electron micrograph of untreated filter loaded with PM
from Orimulsion 400 at 700x magnification 5-24
6-1. Particle-induced acute lung injury 6-4
7-1. Movement, spill volumes, and spill rates of heavy oils
in U.S. domestic waters between 1991 and 1996 7-2
7-2. Spill of nonfloating oil in low-current fresh water 7-3
7-3. Spill of nonfloating oil in high-current fresh water 7-4
7-4. Spill of nonfloating oil in high-current salt water 7-5
9-1. Estimated recoverable reserves of coal in the U.S. by sulfur content 9-2
9-2. U.S. electricity generation in 1997 by fossil fuel 9-4
9-3. U.S. utility and industrial coal consumption in 1997 by state 9-6
9-4. U.S. fuel oil consumption by the commercial, industrial,
oil company, and utility sectors in 1997 by state 9-7
xiv
-------
List of Figures (Continued)
Page
9-5. U.S. natural gas consumption by the commercial,
industrial, and utility sectors in 1997 by state 9-10
9-6. Comparison of particle size distributions from the
combustion of pulverized coal before and after an ESP 9-15
9-7. Particle size distributions for a No. 6 fuel oil and the same fuel oil
in a 90% oil/10% water emulsion 9-17
Volume 2
B-l. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 18, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 400 B-2
B-2. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 19, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 400 B-3
B-3. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 20, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 400 B-4
B-4. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 21, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 400 B-5
B-5. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 24, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 100 B-6
B-6. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 25, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 100 B-7
B-7. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 26, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 100 B-8
B-8. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken May 27, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of Orimulsion 100 B-9
B-9. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken June 3, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of No. 6 fuel oil B-10
B-10. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken June 4, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of No. 6 fuel oil B-l 1
B-l 1. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken June 7, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of No. 6 fuel oil B-12
B-12. CEM data for O2, CO, NO, and SO2 taken June 8, 1999 during
EPA's pilot scale testing of No. 6 fuel oil B-l 3
xv
-------
List of Tables
Volume 1
Page
ES-1. Summary of air pollutant concentrations reported in the
literature for Orimulsion and heavy fuel oil ES-4
2-1. Typical properties of Cerro Negro bitumen 2-3
2-2. Typical values and ranges of Orimulsion 100 properties and constituents 2-5
2-3. Radioactive elements present in Orimulsion 2-6
2-4. Metals and radioactive elements present in Orimulsion fly ash 2-9
2-5. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)
results for Orimulsion 100 and coal fly ashes 2-10
3 -1. Flue gas composition for pilot-scale tests using a burner from
Dunamenti Power Station 3-3
3-2. Plants that have operated or are were operating commercially as of
December 2000 using Orimulsion 3-7
3-3. Emissions measured during Dalhousie Station Unit 1 Demonstration 3-9
3-4. Stack trace metal emissions in mg/Nm3 measured at Asnaes Unit 5 3-17
3-5. Trace metal concentrations in Orimulsion 100 fly ash
in mg/kg measured at Asnaes Unit 5 3-18
3-6. Trace metal concentrations in dry scrubber sludge samples
taken during operation with coal and Orimulsion 100 from Asnaes Unit 5 3-19
3-7. Emissions of trace metal compounds during tests of Orimulsion 400
at ENEL Fiume Santo Plant 3-20
3-8. Comparison of long-term contributions to ambient concentration or deposition
of pollutants from the combustion of Orimulsion 100 at Marbach III Power Plant . . . 3-24
3-9. CO emissions measured during pilot- and full-scale tests
for heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 100 3-29
3-10. NOX emissions measured during pilot- and full-scale tests for
heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 3-30
3-11. Reported SO3 emissions measured during pilot- and full-scale tests
for heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 3-31
3-12. Reported PM emissions measured during pilot- and full-scale tests
for heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 3-32
3-13. Reported PM size distributions measured during pilot- and
full-scale tests for heavy fuel oil and Orimulsion 3-33
3-14. Emissions of selected hazardous air pollutants from
coal, heavy fuel oil, and Orimulsion 3-33
4-1. Test matrix for EPA pilot-scale tests of Orimulsion air pollutant emissions 4-2
5-1. Elemental analyses (as received) of the three fuels tested 5-2
5-2. Average O2 stack concentrations for each test run, and average of four test runs 5-2
5-3. Average fuel flows for each test run, and average of four test runs 5-3
xvi
-------
List of Tables (Continued)
Page
5-4. SO2 concentrations for the three fuels tested as measured by CEM and MACS
methods, and as calculated based on complete conversion of fuel sulfur to SO2 5-7
5-5. Volatile organic compounds for which samples were analyzed 5-11
5-6. Semivolatile organic compounds for which samples were analyzed 5-12
5-7. Semivolatile organic compounds detected in the flue gases of the three fuels 5-15
5-8. Measured and calculated emission factors and percent recoveries for 12 metals 5-19
5-9. Results of XRF analyses of untreated filters and samples 5-20
5-10. XRF analyses of untreated and treated filters loaded with PM from the three fuels .... 5-21
5-11. Emission factors for CO, NO, SO2, and PM from the three fuels tested 5-21
6-1 Physicochemical characterization of collected PM2 5 oil fly ash
samples and Arizona road dust particles 6-2
6-2 Biomarkers of pulmonary acute toxicity or injury 6-3
6-3 Relative toxicity of oil fly ash and dust exposures at the lowest
observed effect level (LOEL) for each endpoint 6-3
8-1. Summary of risk estimates from inhalation exposure to
priority HAPs for 137 oil fired utility boilers in the U.S 8-12
9-1. Ranges of trace element concentrations in coals 9-2
9-2. Range of selected average trace element concentrations for U.S. coals
from different regions of the country, and maximum and minimum
concentrations from individual samples 9-3
9-3. Range of averages and reported typical values of trace element
concentrations in residual fuel oils from different sources 9-3
9-4. CO emission factors for coal, fuel oil, and natural gas 9-9
9-5. SO2 emission factors for three coal types and for No. 6 fuel oil 9-12
9-6. Filterable PM emission factors for different fuels
and different combustion system designs 9-13
10-1. Data quality indicator goals for critical measurements 10-2
10-2. CEM full-range and mid-range span check results 10-3
10-3. CEM system bias check results 10-4
10-4. VOC target analytes and method detection limits 10-5
10-5. VOC surrogate recovery results 10-6
10-6. VOC matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate results 10-6
10-7. SVOC matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate results 10-7
10-8. SVOC pre-extraction surrogate recovery levels 10-8
10-9. Pre-sampling surrogate recovery/XAD samples 10-10
10-10. Internal laboratory QC summary 10-11
10-11. Spiked metal sample recoveries 10-13
XVII
-------
Appendix B
Continuous Emission Monitoring Data for EPA Pilot-Scale Tests
CEM data collected from each of the 12 test runs are presented below. Figures B-l through B-12
present CO, NO, O2, and SO2 concentrations (uncorrected) for each of the four test runs conducted
for each of the three fuels. The top plot in each case shows O2 concentration, and the bottom plot
shows CO, NO, and SO2. The sampling personnel attempted to collect samples when O2 and CO
fluctuations were minimal, and did not sample during periods when there were large fluctuations in
conditions.
The plots are presented in chronological order, with Figures B-l through B-4 showing results from
tests of Orimulsion 400, Figures B5 through B-8 showing results from Orimulsion 100, and Figures
B-9 through B-12 showing results from No. 6 fuel oil.
B-l
-------
5/18/99
Orimulsion 400
o
19DD
E-
R~ mnn
Q_ I UUU
cf
0
*= RDD
CO OUU
-HJ
o ROD
O
o
WAr\r\
tuu
O -
9nn
£\j\j
-
c
£
<
c
u
c
T
*l
1 1 1
>^
JV
> 2
f. <
3 5
0 T
NJ ^
— T
1
'i'1 '
'
:
/
>
2
t
i
1
1
H
«
£
<
c
c
c
L.
T
f *.* •
--
1 1
> :
t c
o c
M C
0 U
0 t
C
i i
r «
*•••"• '.
'
1
> 2
L C
3 5
0 T
c
Nl C
• ., .
'"•
V
> :
L C
0 C
r c
c
0 "
M C
, - i
•
^A-
> :
L C.
O '
N C
0 L
3" C
Nl •<
V1
s.
L
5
0
1 1r
1
c.
c
T
T
c
T
> :
L C
O "
^- c
- C
Nl C
— T
> :
L C
t C
Nl C
0 u
O u
— T
• • , lr l\
> :
L C
O "
D ^
0 t
0 t
C
' «. »jt
> :
L C.
t C
3" C
- C
C
Nl C
" V
i
\l
S*
> 2
L C
O C
Nl C
0 U
Nl T
Nl C
rn
NO
_ _ S09
>
L
0
0
t
Sl
Figure B-1. CEM data forO2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 18, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 400.
B-2
-------
5/19/99
Orimulsion 400
CO
o
CD
CNl
CD
CNl
CO
co
q
cb
o
<
CO
CD
CNl
CO
CO
CO
Q_
CO
CD
O
o_
CO
CNl
CO
CNl
Figure B-2. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 19, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 400.
B-3
-------
20-
18-
14-
2? 12-
OCVMO-
8-
6-
2-
0-
1200-
1000-
Orimulsion 400
t
c
o
"ro
"c
CD
o
o
O
0-
-200-
r/n
• • 1
CO
- - so
<<<
-------
5/21/99
Orimulsion 400
Figure B-4. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 21, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 400.
B-5
-------
5/24/99
Orimulsion 100
o
<
o
Q_
O
*JWI,'U|
>""
\A M
CO
— so
CNl
03
CNl
CNl
od
m
CO
CNl
CNl
ob
m
CNl
Figure B-5. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 24, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 100.
B-6
-------
1.0-
0.5-
0.0-
1200-
1000-
5/25/99
Orimulsion 100
E
Q.
^ 800-
o
"03
•£ 600-
CD
O
c
O 400-
CD
O
200-
0-
\ * '
CO
/ \
CO
NO
- - S0
Q_
CO
CN
CO
CN
CO
CD
CN
CO
o
CO
Figure B-6. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 25, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 100.
B-7
-------
1.0-
0.5-
0.0-
1200-
5/26/99
Orimulsion 100
1000-
E
Q.
Q.
w 800-
c
o
'-t-t
03
~ 600-
CD
O
c
O 400-
03
200-
0-
CO
'*
I I*
»
t f «
CO
NO
SO,
CD
O
CO
CN1
CO
CM
CO
<
CO
CD
CM
CM
CO
8
CD
CO
CD
Figure B-7. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 26, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 100.
-------
Orimulsion 100
<
CO
CD
CN1
o
<
CM
m
0
<
CM
0
•5—
<
CO
CD
•5—
<
\J
\J
m
CO
•5—
<
CO
CM
CN1
in
•5—
Q_
O
CD
0
CN1
Q_
CO
CN1
CN1
Q_
CO
CM
CM
CN1
Q_
O
CD
CN1
Q_
CO
m
•5—
Q_
m
CM
CO
•5—
Q_
m
CD
•5—
Figure B-8. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken May 27, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of Orimulsion 100.
B-9
-------
2-
1-
0-
6/3/99
Fuel Oil
mnn
Q.
Q.
- snn
£- ouu
0
•^ RDD
CD
o
o
OAr\r\
CD
O
-
•".'"„
, / x ^
^
.„
II-'
v ' \ \± *f
i
1
/J\^j^^
J'*l>
'*"**-"•'%•-" *
i>" .»
V^iv ', i
» *
'** f
.•^ •» »
„,,-,-
j^^..... ...
rn
NO
- - S02
q
cb
Q_
CO
CD
CM
CM
Q_
CO
CM
CO
CM
8
CD
O
Q_
CO
CD
CO
CM
CO
CO
CO
0
Q_
CO
CD
q
CM
Figure B-9. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken June 3, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of No. 6 fuel oil.
B-10
-------
6/4/99
Fuel Oil
Q.
Q.
1000-
c
CD
O
o 600-
CO
0-
fV-r-
CO
SO,
8
CD
CM
CM
CN1
r^
CO
8
CO
CN1
r^
csi
CO
Q_
CO
CD
q
CO
Figure B-10. CEM data for O2 (top), CO, NO, and SO2 (bottom) taken June 4, 1999 during EPA's pilot-scale testing
of No. 6 fuel oil.
B-ll
-------
6/7/99
Fuel Oil
0
c
o
I
"c
CD
O
O
O
CO
CO
O
19DD
mnn
I UUU
-
finn
/inn
4UU
-
,
V.,
^ ..
i y •»
' k ' i'f * \
•w,
' V
•l'
, , 1
11 >l 1 "
1
,
/A
;.-.
1 * W4
*"•. •***
At
.JH
i
"t\
f
/•.\,; J
-A
L * *f
^.
'l'1'
1
VS.'/
..
• - - 1^-
L
l,
rn
NO
- - S09
z
8
CD
CN1
-------
6/8/99
Fuel Oil
•E 600-
-
CD
O
O
O
w
CD
O
100-
0-
•„..—.-
CO
<
CM
Q_
CO
Q_
CO
CO
m
o_
s
in
CO
m
CO
CO
s s
m
CO
CM
m
CD
o
m
CM
CM
-------
APPENDIX C
Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Laboratory Reports
Concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured in EPA's Organics Support
Laboratory, located in the Environmental Research Center in Research Triangle Park, NC. Analyses
were conducted by chemists from ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller, the contractor for EPA's Air
Pollution Prevention and Control Division.
The analyses were conducted to specifically determine levels of benzene, ethylene, toluene, and
xylenes (BTEX), which were the criteria compounds for the analyses. The laboratory report stated
that other compounds detected may have been outside the criteria used for BTEX, and the data
should be evaluated using the case narrative supporting the data.
The following pages are the detailed case narrative and laboratory reports for each of the three
samples collected from each of the three fuels. Also included are the matrix spike and matrix spike
dupicate results and the results from the field blank used to evaluate laboratory contamination of the
samples.
C-l
-------
Case Narrative for Orimulsion VOST Analysis by GC/MS
A 5-point initial calibration was performed on April 28th and 29th, 1999. Each
calibration level and the method detection limit study was performed by flash evaporation at
235°C of methanolic aliquots of standard VOC's. Each VOST pair was allowed to stand for 5
minutes (after flish evaporation) at a flow of lOmL/min, transferred to the GC/MS clamshell
heater and thermally desorbed onto the GC/MS system. In an effort to ensure proper thermal
transfer for all of the target compounds, each VOST tube pair was positioned to bias the Tenax
portion fully into the heated zone. The calibration ranged between 10 ng and 250 ng on column.
Internal standards were injected into the sidearm of the sparging vessel during each calibration
and analysis. All target analytes had a relative standard deviation less than 30 % for this initial
calibration.
Next, a 6 point method detection limit study was performed by spiking and analyzing a
clean, VOST pair with the low level standard of 10 nanograms for each target VOC and
surrogate VOC in accordance with SW-846 methodology for determination of detection limits.
All target analytes had method detection limit values at least a factor of 2 less than the lowest
calibration (PQL) except for two brominated compounds and tetrachloroethylene which were
both below the PQL of 10 ng. Replicated matrix spikes of a separate BTEX standard was
peformed using flash evaporation. Spike recoveries ranged from 87 % to 116 % (values not
composited into a table but submitted in the regular report format). Two composited tables
inclusive of the calibration response factor data and the method detection limit study are
attached.
C-2
-------
A mid-level standard was performed prior to daily sample analysis. Relative percent
deviations less than 30 % when compared to the average response factors formed from the initial
calibration were found for all target analytes of interest. The 4-bromofluorobenzene peak
chosen from this standard passed method tuning criteria on each day. Prior to sample analysis,
the system's inherent background for target components was determined. Sample VOST tubes
were spiked prior to field sampling with surrogate compounds specified by the method. Samples
were tagged on the data spreadsheets to reflect the target VOC background determined from the
most recent matrix blank (other qualifiers were also attached). Values lower than the calculated
MDL for a few compounds such as dichloromethane, toluene, 1,2-dibromoethane, m,p xylenes,
bromobenzene and the dichlorobenzenes were noticed. The field blank demonstrated that all
compounds were below the calculated detection limit except for dichloromethane (which was
directly on the detection limit of 3.7 ng). All samples had similar results with low to mid-range
values of benzene, toluene, xylenes and styrene present. Carbon disulfide and dichloromethane
were present at varying levels. If you have any questions, please give Dennis (ext...2686) a call.
Bill Preston
Arcadis Geraghty & Miller Chemist
C-3
-------
Orimulsion YOST Method Detection Limit Study
Analyte
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-DichIoroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
Bromodichloromethane
c- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
t-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
4/28/99 4/29/99 4/29/99 4/29/99 4/29/99 4/29/99
Run#l Run #2 Run #3 Run #4 Run #5 Run #6 StdDev MDL(ng)
8.90
10.45
8.37
14.04
9.52
9.55
9.97
10.10
9.79
9.57
9.45
10.59
13.14
10.15
9.83
10.54
9.64
9.90
11.91
11.22
10.64
10.18
9.06
10.39
10.11
9.99
17.44
10.13
10.57
9.95
9.74
9.70
9.80
7.99
9.40
7.60
13.74
8.84
8.73
9.27
8.48
9.13
9.64
9.57
9.21
12.06
9.52
9.53
8.91
9.18
8.84
12.16
9.41
8.64
10.23
8.85
8.39
9.33
9.36
15.83
9.05
8.93
9.37
9.21
8.53
8.81
7.62
8.47
7.15
13.55
8.61
8.33
8.80
8.15
8.68
9.06
9.02
8.80
11.94
11.40
11.86
10.76
9.97
10.27
11.13
8.25
7.91
9.63
9.43
9.72
8.55
8.81
15.16
8.67
8.78
8.40
8.33
8.11
8.25
7.86
7.99
7.21
13.88
8.65
8.51
9.15
8.44
9.31
9.44
9.20
9.74
10.72
9.99
9.94
9.87
9.69
9.84
12.00
10.07
9.89
12.82
12.01
12.34
10.66
10.93
19.40
11.41
11.31
10.87
10.72
10.57
10.30
7.93
8.07
7.31
16.23
8.64
8.90
9.05
8.94
8.54
8.77
8.79
8.94
11.69
8.72
8.93
8.39
7.54
7.72
10.56
8.07
7.47
8.63
6.96
7.57
7.65
8.08
14.00
8.03
8.05
7.48
7.52
7.36
7.37
8.02
7.69
7.47
17.06
8.60
9.35
8.56
9.78
9.61
9.40
9.24
10.06
12.43
9.04
9.89
9.45
7.51
8.70
11.17
8.38
7.59
9.46
6.90
8.25
7.98
8.13
13.58
7.47
7.22
7.06
6.89
6.53
6.49
0.49
1.04
0.50
1.10
0.38
0.47
0.44
0.77
0.50
0.37
0.32
0.73
0.87
0.98
1.10
1.02
0.97
1.04
0.68
1.31
1.33
1.55
1.81
1.85
1.20
1.09
2.10
1.33
1.36.
1.32
1.24
1.28
1.18
1.6
3.5
1.7
3.7
1.3
1.6
1.5
2.6
1.7
1.2
1.1
2.4
2.9
3.3
3.7
3.4
3.3
3.5
2.3
4.4
4.5
5.2
6.1
6.2
4.0
3.7
7.1
4.5
4.6
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.0
C-4
-------
Response Factor Report Volatile
Method
Title
Last Update
Response via
H:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\V042899.M (Chemstation Integrator)
Orimulsion VOST analysis by Method 5041
Wed May 05 20:07:56 1999
Initial Calibration
Calibration Files
3 =VS34289A.D 2
4 =VS44289A.D 5
Compound
=VS24289A.D 1
=VS54299A.D
=VS14289B.D
Avg %RSD
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
"7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
1 C \
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
23)
24)
25)
26)
27)
28)
29)
30)
31)
32)
33)
34)
35)
36)
37)
(#)
I Pentafluorobenzene
ccc-1, 1-Dichloroethen
lodomethane
Carbon disulfide
Dichlorome thane
trans-1, 2-Dichloroeth
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1 , 2-Dichloroethen
Bromochloromethane
ccc-Chloroform
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
S d4-l,2 Dichloroethane
1, 2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
I 1, 4— Dif lluorobenzene
Trichloroethene
ccc-1, 2-Oichloroprop
Dibromomethane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1, 3-Dichloroprope
s d8 -Toluene
ccc-Toluene
trans-1, 3-Dichloropro
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane
Tet rachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1, 2-Dibromoethane
I d5-Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzene
ccc-Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Styrene
S 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Bromobenzene
d4-l, 4-Dichlorobenzen
= Out of Range
ID ID — — — —
0.800
0.756
1.621
0.763
0.496
0.948
0.534
0.669
0.923
0.740
0.623
0.435
0.521
1.792
0.500
0.422
0.254
0.493
0.532
1.061
1.271
0.381
0.185
0.329
0.259
0.273
0.854
0.772
1.709
0.839
0.504
1.007
0.548
0.677
1.000
0.757
0.623
0.472
0.520
1.864
0.540
0.448
0.258
0.572
0.602
1.253
1.395
0.467
0.231
0.350
0.336
0.309
0.666
0.739
1.240
1.139
0.435
0.848
0.493
0.627
0.855
0.646
0.524
0.514
0.502
0.722
0.625
1.424
0.663
0<425
0.821
0.449
0.584
0.789
0.626
0.524
0.444
0.461
2.290 1.511
T CTI"\
loIU — -
0.505 0.491
0.394
0.262
0.468
0.521
1.290
1.545
0.444
0.201
0.324
0.239
0.289
0.366
0.246
0.449
0.498
1.109
1.137
0.380
0.195
0.293
0.268
0.306
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
699
652
420
652
424
816
451
549
801
598
477
364
368
254
453
371
222
442
478
992
135
306
138
294
217
215
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
748
709
483
811
457
888
495
621
874
673
554
446
475
742
498
400
248
485
526
141
296
395
190
318
264
278
10.
9.
12.
24.
8.
9.
9.
8.
10.
10.
11.
12.
13.
22.
6.
8.
6.
10.
9.
11.
13.
15.
17.
7.
17.
13.
32
30
47
45
70
60
23
88
11
49
86
38
53
40
29
66
28
89
00
10
56
92
76
71
04
75
ISTD
0.814
1.484
0.444
0.404
0.565
0.477
0.309
1.074
1.892
0.591
0.548
0.813
0.705
0.443
0.867
1.523
0.489
0.438
0.658
0.547
0.337
0.782
1.411
0.448
0.416
0.588
0.537
0.323
0.
1.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0
,752
,324
,341
.357
.488
.352
.281
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
,858
,527
,462
,433
,623
.524
.338
14.
14.
19.
16.
19.
24.
18.
93
25
,51
,38
,69
.41
.37
— lol U—
V042899.M
Fri Jul 16 17:10:43 1999
Page 1
C-5
-------
Method
Title
Last Update
Response via
Response Factor Report Volatile
H:\HPCHEM\2\METHODS\V042899.M {Chemstation Integrator)
Orimulsion VOST analysis by Method 5041
Wed May 05 20:07:56 1999
Initial Calibration
Calibration Files
3 =VS34289A.D
4 =VS44289A.D
Compound
2
5
=VS24289A.D
=VS54299A.D
=VS14289B.D
Avg
%RSD
38) If3-Dichlorobenzene
39) l,4-Dichlorobenzene
40) 1,2-dichlorobenzene
0.926 1.430 0.997 0.963 0.834 1.030 22.48
0.895 1.350 0.968 0.962 0.816 0.998 20.64
0.775 1.151 0.854 0.882 0.699 0.872 19.66
(#) = Out of Range
V042899.M
Fri Jul 16 17:10:44 1999
Page 2
C-6
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 5181405
Lab Sample ID: 9905029
MS Data file: V995299A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 05/18/99
Date Acquired: 05/24/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/905181405SV 10BL04-Clamshell temp controller failed to maintain at 233°c
and was noticed at 330°C after analysis/Benzene in blank at 2.9 ng
Surrogates
d4-l,2-dichloroethane(suiT)
d8-toluene (surr)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
86.1 P
100.4 P
119.7 P
Compound
ng
1.1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethanc
t-1,2-Dichlorocthcne
1.1-Dichloroethane
c-1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethanc
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tctrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethanc
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-13-Dichloropropcnc
5.9 J Toluene
183.0 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachlorocthene
ND Dibtomochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibrornoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Bthylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
40.2 B Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND U-Dkhlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-DichIorobenzene
ND
ND
19.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.9
11.9
ND
16.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = ooc detected
Undetected in blank
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak bdow the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCADIS Geraghty Miller
518H05.xls
C-7
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
5191058
9905030
V995309A
5041A
Date Sampled: 05/19/99
Date Acquired: 05/24/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/903191058SV20BUM-CUmshdl decorber temp controller failed to maintain at 233°C
and was noticed at 330°C after analysis/Benzene in blank at 2.9 ng
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichlorocthane(«urr)
d8-tolucne (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(iurr)
Compound
% Recovery
84.1 P
97.3 P
107.6 P
Compound
ng
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfidc
Dichloromethane
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromcthane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloridc
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethane
5.5 I c-l,3-Dichloropropcne
59.9 Toluene
59.9 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylcnes
ND o-Xytene
102.9 B Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
28.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.5
ND
20.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not delected E = Peak over calibration range
Undetected in blank I = Pe*k I
7/28/99
ARCADIS Geraghty Miller
C-8
519105il.xls
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 5211256
Lab Sample ID: 9905041
MS Data file: V995419A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 05/21/99
Date Acquired: 05/24/99
Analyst Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/90521 1256SV10BUM-a.msnelI temp controller failed to maintain ,t 233'c
and was noticed at 330«C after analysis/Benzene in blank at 2.9 ng.
Surrogates
d4-l,2-dichloroedune(surr)
d8-toluene (surr)
4-bromofluorobenzene(siirr)
Compound
% Recovery
85.5
32.2
109.1
P
F
P
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
M.2-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
c-l^-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
U-Dfchloroethane
Benzene
Trichlorocthene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethanc
6.1
72.4
64.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
135.0
ND
ND
ND
Bromodichloromethane
c-1.3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
t-l,3-Dichloropropene
1.1.2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
U-Dibromoemane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromobenzene
13-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
7.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.2
ND
22.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = lt*overalib«io0iin|e
Undetected in blank J = Pe* below die calibwion nnje
7/28«9
ARCAD1S Geraghty Miller
C-9
521I256.«U
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 5241337
Lab Sample ID: 9905042
MS Data file: V990542A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 05/24/99
Date Acquired: 05/31/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/905241337SV1OBLO1
Surrogates
d4- l,2-dichlorocthane(surr)
d8-loluene (surr)
4-bromofluoroben2cne(surr)
Compound
Recovery
65.8
94.1
115.0
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
t-l,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethanc
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1.1 -Trichlorocthanc
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichlorocthane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropanc
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-13-Dichloropropene
7.6 J Toluene
36.6 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1.2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylenc
20.6 Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1.3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
12.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not detected E = Peak over calibration range
B=detecied in blank J = Peak below the calibration range
7/8/99
ARCADIS Geraghly Miller
5241337.xls
C-10
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 5251243
Lab Sample ID: 9905051
MS Data file: V990551A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 05/25/99
Dale Acquired: 05/31/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/905251243S V1OBLO1
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethane(surr)
d8-toluene (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
100.9 P
71.0 P
119.8 P
ng
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfidc
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1 -Dichloroe thane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichlorocthene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-l,3-Dichloropropene
3.0 J Toluene
10.7 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
55.2 Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzcne
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzenc
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
13.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.5
ND
9.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not delected
B=deiected in blink
E - Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCADIS Geraghty Miller
5251243-Xls
C-ll
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 5261102
Lab Sample ID: 9905057
MS Data file: V990557A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 05/26/99
Date Acquired: 05/31/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/905261102SV10BL01
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethanc(surr)
d8-toluene (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
73.1 P
96.3 P
117.0 P
ng
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1 -Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1.1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropanc
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-l,3-Dichloropropene
5.0 J Toluene
55.0 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
73.6 Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzenc
ND
ND
19.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.7
10.0
ND
5.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
NDc not detected
Undetected in blank
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below the calibration range
7/8/99
ARCADIS Gcraghty Miller
5261102.xls
C-12
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
6031301
9906006
V996006A
5041A
Date Sampled: 06/04/99
Date Acquired: 06/17/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/906031301S V1OBLR6
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethane(surr)
d8-toluenc (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
64.7
90.7
123.9
ng
F
P
P
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfidc
Dichloromethane
t-1.2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroe thane
c-1.2-Dichloroe thane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1.1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloridc
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomcthane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-1,3-Dichloropropene
28.9 Toluene
ND t-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
23.6 Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
47.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30.9
113.1
37.6
15.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not delected E = Peak over calibration range
B=dciecled in blank J = Peak below the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCADIS Oeraghiy Miller
C-13
603l301.xls
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 6041340
Lab Sample ID: 9906015
MS Data file: V996015A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 06/04/99
Date Acquired: 06/17/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/906041340SV10BLR6
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethanc(surr)
d8-toluene (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobcnzenc(suir)
Compound
% Recovery
57.3 F
95.5 P
134.1 F
ng
Compound
1,1 Dichlorocthcne
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-Dichloroelhcne
1,1 -Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichloroemane
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethanc
ND c-l,3-Dichloropropcnc
7.2 J Toluene
383.8 t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroelhenc
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
20.0 Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobcnzcne
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
13.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.2
23.9
6.4
10.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not detected
Undetected in blink
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCADIS Geraghly Miller
C-14
604l340.xls
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
6071305
9906018
V990618A
5041A
Date Sampled: 06/07/99
Date Acquired: 06/16/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/906071305SV10BLR6
Benzene in matrix blank at 4.9 ng.
Surrogates % Recovery
d4-l,2-dichloroethane(surr) 64.5 F
dS-toluene (surr) 82.0 P
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr) 157.0 F
Compound ng Compound
ng
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomelhane
Carbon Disulfidc
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichlorocthane
c-1,2-Dichlorocthanc
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroe thane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromome thane
ND Bromodichloromethane
ND c-l,3-Dichloropropene
22.3 Toluene
ND t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1.2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromcthane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylcnes
ND o-Xylene
16.0 B Slyrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
25.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8.2
36.7
9.9
10.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = not detected
Undetected in blank
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCAD1S Geraghty Miller
607l305.xls
C-15
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 4301230/FB
Lab Sample ID: 9905001
MS Datafile: V995001A
Method: 5041A
Date Sampled: 04/30/99
Date Acquired: 04/30/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Sample/904301230SV10BLR6/Field Blank
3.7 ng of dichloromethane was in the matrix blank
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethane(surr)
d8-toluene (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
91.6 P
101.6 P
120.6 P
ng
Compound
ng
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromethane
t-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroe thane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochlotomethanc
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichlorocthcne
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
ND Bromodichloromethanc
ND c-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND Toluene
3.7 J,B t-l,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND Tetrachloroethene
ND Dibromochloromethane
ND 1,2-Dibromoethane
ND Chlorobenzene
ND Ethylbenzene
ND m,p-Xylenes
ND o-Xylene
ND Styrene
ND Bromobenzene
ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
2.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND - not detected E = Peak over calibration range
B=detected in blank 1 = Peak below the calibration range
7/28/99
ARCADIS Geragluy Miller
4301230.xls
C-16
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: Matrix Spike
Lab Sample ID: 9905049
MS Data file: V990549a
Method: 5041A
Date Spiked: 05/25/99
Date Acquired: 05/25/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Tenax-B05689/T/C-B05695
Matrix Spike #1 at 150 ng each B.T.E.X component
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethanc(surr)
d8-loluene (surr)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
% Recovery
86.6 P
103.9 P
112.7 P
ng
Compound
ng
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dtchloromethane
t-l,2-Dichloroethcne
1,1 -Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichlorocthanc
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
NS Bromodichloromethane
NS c-l,3-Dichloropropcne
NS Toluene
NS t-l,3-Dichloropropene
NS 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
NS Tetrachloroethene
NS Dibromochloromethane
NS 1,2-Dibromoethane
NS Chlorobenzene
NS Ethylbenzene
NS m,p-Xylenes
NS o-Xylene
135.0 Styrene
NS Bromobenzene
NS 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NS 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NS
NS
1453
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
161.4
173.8
168.8
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND = not spiked
B=detected in blank
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below the calibration range
7/8/99
ARCAD1S Geraghty Miller
orivolmsl.xls
C-17
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Volatile Organic Sampling Tube Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Matrix Spike
9905050
V990550A
5041A
Date Spiked: 05/25/99
Date Acquired: 05/25/99
Analyst: Bill Preston
QC reviewer: Dennis Tabor
Sample Description/Narrative:
Tenax-B05689/T/C-B05695
Matrix Spike #2 at 150 ng each B,T,E,X component
Surrogates
d4-1,2-dichloroethane(surr)
d8-toluene (SUIT)
4-bromofluorobenzene(surr)
Compound
Recovery
87.5 P
89.4 P
112.5 P
Compound
1,1 Dichloroethene
lodomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Dichloromcthane
t-1,2-Dichlorocthcnc
1,1 -Dichloroethane
c-1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromochloromcthane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Telrachloride
1 ^-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
NS Bromodichloromethane
NS c-l,3-Dichloropropene
NS Toluene
NS t-1,3-Dichloropropene
NS 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
NS Tetrachloroethene
NS Dibromochloromethane
NS 1,2-Dibromoethane
NS Chlorobenzene
NS Ethylbenzene
NS m,p-Xylenes
NS o-Xylene
130.4 Styrene
NS Bromobenzene
NS 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NS 1,4-Dichlorobcnzene
1,2-Dichlorobcnzene
NS
NS
139.9
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
169.0
172.0
172.9
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ND = not ipiked
B=deceded in blank
E = Peak over calibration range
J = Peak below (he calibration range
7/8/99
ARCADIS Geraghty Miller
orivolmsd.xls
C-18
-------
APPENDIX D
Semivolatile Organic Compound Analysis Laboratory Reports
D-l
-------
Case Narrative for Orimulsion Semivolatile Analysis by Method 8270
A five-level calibration was performed on June 24 -25th, 1999. Levels 1 through 4
(10,30,60, and 90 ug/mL) were analyzed on June 24th and level 5 (100 ug/mL) was analyzed on
June 25th, 1999. The relative standard deviation of the average response factors throughout the
calibration range was generally below 10 % with few exceptions. The relative standard deviation
for 13C6-2,5-phthalic anhydride was the only constituent greater than 30 % at 37.21%. A rigorous
method detection limit study was not performed prior to sample analysis. Past semivolatile analysis
allowed insight for establishing an arbitrary cutoff of 1 ug/mL (1 ng on column) for the instrumental
detection limit. Sample concentrations near this value were scrutinized carefully to ensure excellent
retention time matching and adequate confirmation ion ratios.
Method 8270 daily sample analysis consisted of initially passing the DFTPP tuning criteria.
The monitoring for the presence of benzidine in the DFTPP tuning solution (which was present hi
all cases) and the monitoring for DDT lack of degradation were done daily prior to sample analysis.
After the DFTPP passed all tuning criteria, a mid-point calibration standard was analyzed. The mid-
level standard was compared to the initial calibration curve. All constituents of interest were less
than 30 % relative deviation in all cases.
Each sampling condition had three separate analyses: XAD, filter, and the condensate which
were analyzed bjetween July 25th and July 29th, 1999. Pre-extraction surrogates were spiked into
every sample arid pre-sampling surrogates (additional APPCD-OSL QC) were added to the XAD
portions only. Generally, the pre-extraction and pre-sampling surrogates passed pass/fail criteria (a
D-2
-------
table comprising the acceptance criteria for the pre-sampling and pre-extraction surrogates is
attached). Replicated matrix spikes of P AHs of interest determined recovery values between 50%
and 77% when compared to the initial calibration. This directly parallels the surrogates recovery
data. All samples had very low to non-detectable levels for most of the PAH targets and for the
additional analyte list with a few exceptions for phthalates. If you have any questions, please give
me a call at ext...2719.
Arcadis Geraghty & Miller Chemist,
Bill Preston
D-3
-------
Sheet!
Surrogates Recovery Limits Used for the Orimulsion Study
Description
2-Fluorophenol
d5-Phenol
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
d5-Nitrobenzene
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Recovery limits
24-113
25-121
19-122
23-120
30-115
D-4
-------
Method
Title
Last Update
Response via
Response Factor Report Semi2
F:\ORIMUL~1\METHODS\S062499.M (RTE Integrator)
Orimulsion PAH Analysis by method 8270
Wed Jul 28 08:42:17 1999
Initial Calibration
Calibration Files
2 =SC26249A.D 1
4 =SC46249A.D 5
Compound
1) i
2)
3)
4) S
5)
6)
7)
8)
9) S
10) M
11)
12)
13) M
14) s
15)
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
23) M
24) i
25) S
26)
27)
28)
29)
30)
31) s
32) M
33)
34) s
35)
36)
37)
38)
D4-1, 4-dichlorobenzen
n-Nitrosomethylethyla
Methyl Methanesulfona
2-Fluorophenol (surrll
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) eth
Ethyl methanesulfonat
Aniline
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
Phenol (CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1, 3-Dichlorobenzene
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene (C
13C6-1,2 dichlorobenz
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
4 -methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propyla
DS-Naphthalene (QS#2)
05-Nitrobenzene (surr#
Nitrobenzene
1-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2, 4-Dimethylphenol
Bis (2-chloroethoxy)me
13C6-2,5 dichlorophen
2, 4-Dichlorophenol (CC
1,2, 4-Trichlorobenzen
13C6-Napthalene (pre
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol (CCC)
2, 6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
=SC16249A.D
=SC56259A.D
2 1
3
3
=SC36249A.D
4 5 Avg
%RSD
— — J-bl U —
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1,
0,
1,
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
743
801
506
610
396
460
692
698
832
378
625
653
,448
.516
.862
.650
.238
.517
.886
.687
.541
.905
.504
.516
.301
.936
.326
.474
.320
.317
.363
.122
.073
.227
.313
.235
0.757
0.889
1.625
0.622
1.567
1.593
2.127
1.873
2.004
1.538
1.681
1.778
1.273
1.624
0.886
0.742
1.374
0.558
2.054
0.746
2.889
0.983
0.559
0.570
0.343
1.053
0.359
0.532
0.288
0.340
0.399
1.020
1.158
0.236
0.331
0.243
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
2,
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
815
865
522
674
435
577
535
775
899
456
663
712
436
553
913
678
,311
,565
,938
.700
.611
0.817
0.827
1.446
0.671
1.358
1.488
1.594
1.662
1.797
1.382
1.632
1.647
1.391
1.491
0.815
0.653
1.175
0.533
1.736
0.668
2.275
.935 0.889
T GTH
1 O 1 U
.509 0.513
.537
.315
.977
.337
.485
.330
.329
.367
.116
.086
.243
.328
.250
0.518
0.308
0.965
0.336
0.482
0.332
0.322
0.375
1.094
1.048
0.242
0.323
0.258
0.816
0.895
1.512
0.660
1.478
1.588
1.616
1.751
1.855
1.467
1.695
1.744
1.414
1.599
0.868
0.661
1.258
0.511
1.931
0.737
2.507
0.898
0.535
0.545
0.328
1.013
0.339
0.498
0.325
0.344
0.391
1.094
1.109
0.247
0.337
0.272
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0,
1,
0,
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
790
855
522
647
447
541
713
752
878
444
659
707
,392
.557
.869
.677
.271
.537
.909
.708
.565
.922
.524
.537
.319
.989
.339
.494
.319
.330
.379
.089
.095
.239
.327
.252
4.64
4.74
4.25
4.55
5.58
4.05
13.91
4.62
4.26
4.62
1.84
3.33
5.06
3.56
4.17
5.61
5.92
4.51
6.03
4.66
8.61
4.17
4.36
4.12
5.28
4.56
3.64
4.63
5.53
3.53
4.07
3.75
3.81
3.36
2.71
5.73
(#) = Out of Range
S062499.M
Fri Jul 30 14:47:33 1999
Page 1
D-5
-------
Method
Title
Last Update
Response via
Response Factor Report Semi2
F:\ORIMUL~1\METHODS\S062499.M (RTE Integrator)
Orimulsion PAH Analysis by method 8270
Wed Jul 28 08:42:17 1999
Initial Calibration
Calibration Files
2
4
39)
40) M
41)
42) M
43)
44) i
45)
46) s
47)
48) M
49) M
50)
51) S
52)
53)
54)
55)
56)
57)
58)
59)
60)
=SC26249A.D 1
=SC46249A.D 5
Compound
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene (C
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylam
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phe
2-Methylnaphthalene
DIO-Acenaphthene (QS#3
Isosafrole
13C6-Phthalic Anhydri
1,2,4, 5-Tetrachlorobe
Hexachlorocyclopentad
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol
2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1 , 4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethylphathalate
2, 6-Dinitrotoluene
61) M Acenaphthene (CCC)
62)
63)
64)
1 -Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
65) M 2, 4-Dinitrophenol (SPC
66)
67)
68)
69)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4, 6-Tetrachloroph
70) M 4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
71)
72)
73)
74)
75)
76)
77) S
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl
2-Methyl-4, 6-dinitrop
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
; 2, 4, 6-Tribromophenol (
=SC16249A.D 3
=SC56259A.D
213
0.378
0.214
0.225
0.312
0.651
0.549
0.135
0.670
0.429
0.434
0.471
1.339
0.473
0.253
0.490
0.377
0.257
1.869
0.311
1.421
0.340
1.135
0.934
0.552
0.543
0.163
1.679
0.512
0.440
0.335
0.318
1.297
1.439
0.638
0.252
0.377
1.090
0.179
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
434
219
236
353
716
574
153
707
426
452
483
468
488
255
500
398
267
020
318
480
354
229
813
394
540
0.136
1.
0.
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
771
529
455
344
293
383
563
652
228
.414
.114
.182
0.321
0.219
0.246
0.330
=SC36249A.D
4 5 Avg
0.215
0.227
0.241
0.321
0.658 0.647
T OTT\
Ibl U
0.588 0.578
0.139
0.709
0.460
0.464
0.492
1.406
0.490
0.270
0.491
0.383
0.263
1.955
0.312
1.431
0.355
1.181
0.866
0.482
0.463
0.187
1.709
0.539
0.447
0.335
0.320
1.291
1.441
0.654
0.265
0.350
1.096
0.183
0.083
0.709
0.462
0.463
0.484
1.367
0.478
0.269
0.475
0.371
0.261
1.922
0.301
1.408
0.351
1.168
0.760
0.371
0.463
0.196
1.666
0.535
0.449
0.336
0.319
1.267
1.422
0.644
0.274
0.351
1.072
0.185
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1
0
0
0
0
1
248
238
236
340
677
584
236
722
465
458
489
408
481
284
502
389
269
942
276
465
365
136
833
457
518
205
746
554
487
348
333
355
1.530
0
0
0
1
0
671
293
.386
.130
.193
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
319
223
237
331
670
575
149
704
448
454
484
398
482
266
492
384
263
942
303
441
353
170
841
451
505
178
714
534
456
339
317
318
479
652
263
376
100
.184
%RSD
28.27
4.24
3.41
4.80
4.22
2.69
37.21
2.79
4.36
2.63
1.64
3.48
1.49
4.75
2.17
2.81
1.88
2.81
5.53
2.09
2.61
3.32
7.67
16.02
7.83
15.74
2.57
2.84
4.06
1.80
4.57
3.67
4.27
1.88
9.23
7.05
2.03
2.90
(#) = Out of Range
S062499.M
Fri Jul 30 14:47:41 1999
Page 2
D-6
-------
Response Factor Report Semi2
Method : F:\ORIMUL~1\METHODS\S062499.M (RTE Integrator)
Title : Orimulsion PAH Analysis by method 8270
Last Update : Wed Jul 28 08:42:17 1999
Response via : Initial Calibration
Calibration Files
2
4
78)
79)
80) i
81)
82)
83)
84)
85)
86) M
87)
88)
89) s
90)
91)
92)
93) M
94)
95) i
96)
97)
98) S
99)
100)
101)
102)
103)
104)
105) i
106) M
107)
108)
109)
110) M
111)
112)
113)
114)
=SC26249A.D 1
=SC46249A.D 5
Compound
Diallate
1,3, 5-Trinitrobenzene
DIO-Phenanthrene (QS#4
4-Bromophenyl phenyl
Phenacetin
Hexachlorobenzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol (CCC
Pentachloronitrobenze
Phenanthrene
dlO-Anthracene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene (CCC)
3,3' -Dimethylbenzidin
D12-Chrysene (QS#5)
Pyrene
Chlorobenzilate
D14-Terphenyl (surr#6)
p-Dimethylaminoazoben
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalat
3,3' -Dichlorobenzidin
Benzo (a) anthracene
Chrysene
D12-Perylene (QS#6)
di-n-Octyl phthalate (
Benzo (b) f luoranthene
7, 12-Dimethylbenz (a) a
Benzo (k) f luoranthene
Benzo (a)pyrene (CCC)
3-Methylcholanthrene
Indenod, 2, 3-cd)pyren
Dibenz (a, h) anthracene
Benzo (ghi) perylene
=SC16249A.D
=SC56259A.D
2 1
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1,
0,
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
698
325
211
453
243
516
221
136
093
,140
,025
,172
.541
.148
.172
.245
.539
.405
.922
.289
.582
.815
.382
.336
.255
.862
.206
.520
.156
.058
.520
.007
.988
.048
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
763
306
226
472
255
432
197
137
096
234
911
262
578
150
209
324
,661
,420
.998
.322
.545
.876
.434
.434
.338
.943
.296
.568
.235
.105
.531
.000
.972
.052
3
3
0.674
=SC36249A.D
4 5 Avg
0.656
0.328 0.335
— IblLJ —
0.233 0.232
0.457
0.264
0.526
0.250
0.135
0.098
1.193
1.054
1.223
1.533
0.142
1.181
0.454
0.264
0.464
0.258
0.135
0.098
1.166
1.047
1.199
1.494
0.140
1.172
0.256 0.257
loi U
1.612 1.585
0.424
0.974
0.292
0.651
0.831
0.427
1.423
0.416
0.974
0.276
0.651
0.809
0.412
1.401
1.346 1.345
lol 1J
1.935 1.904
1.282
0.565
1.222
1.130
0.558
1.095
1.093
1.139
1.266
0.562
1.195
1.126
0.549
1.066
1.065
1.101
0.713
0.385
0.241
0.486
0.268
0.507
0.267
0.149
0.104
1.220
1.032
1.251
1.622
0.148
1.255
0.296
1.596
0.438
0.999
0.281
0.671
0.854
0.433
1.443
1.374
2.046
1.344
0.585
1.265
1.178
0.561
1.123
1.100
1.150
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
701
336
228
464
259
489
239
138
098
191
014
221
553
146
198
,275
,598
.420
.973
.292
.620
.837
.417
.408
.332
.938
.279
.560
.215
.119
.544
.058
.043
.098
%RSD
5.86
8.78
5.01
3.13
3.80
8.11
12.08
4.46
4.09
3.26
5.77
3.03
3.12
2.98
2.95
12.16
2.77
2.90
3.19
6.16
8.65
3.31
5.24
3.07
3.36
3.52
3.93
4.27
3.41
3.91
3.26
5.11
5.74
4.33
f) = Out of Range
S062499.M Fri Jul 30 14:47:48 1999 Page 3
D-7
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131F
9905026
S995026A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131SBFO- Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery % Recovery
59 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 70 P
71 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 72 P
87 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 93 P
Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
1 J Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-8
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131F
9905026
S995026A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131SBFO- Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloijophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPbC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalat^
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound MS
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 7
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-9
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131F
9905026
S995026A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/18/99
6/1/99
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131SBFO- Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
7 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-10
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131X
9905027
S995027A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131WSBXO-
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Ruorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(suir#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10- Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene:
Benzyl Alcohol i
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol '
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
80 P
66 P
101 P
iRecovery
86
87
100
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8 J
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
% Recovery
89 P
92 P
128 P
% Recovery
92
142
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-ll
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131X
9905027
S995027A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131WSBXO-XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 15
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
2 J
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-12
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131X
9905027
S995027A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131WSBXO-XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/18/99
6/1/99
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
3 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-13
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131C
9905028
S995028A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
NA
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131SBIO Condensate-Not spiked with pre-extraction surrogates
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(suir#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1,2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopro iy l)ether
2-Methylphenol :
n-Nitrosospyrrolidijne
Acetophenone j
Hexachloroethane !
Recovery
NS
NS
NS
i Recovery
NS
NS
NS
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
NS
NS
NS
> Recovery
NS
NS
fig
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-14
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131C
9905028
S995028A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/18/99
NA
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905181131SBIO Condensate-Not spiked with pre-extraction surrogates
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l.SDinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
fig Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate 3
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-15
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905181131C
9905028
S995028A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
905181131SBIO Condensate-Not spiked with pre-extraction surrogates
Compound ug Compound
5/18/99
NA
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
B enzo(k)fluoranthene
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
2 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-16
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016F
9905032
S995032A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/19/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBFO Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery % Recovery
51 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 58 P
61 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 62 P
78 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 105 P
Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
= Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-17
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016F
9905032
S995032A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled: 05/19/99
Date Extracted: 06/01/99
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBFO Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzeije
2,4-Dinitrotoluenej
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorjjphenol
4-Nitrophenol(SP
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016F
9905032
S995032A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/19/99
6/1/99
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBFO Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
B enzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
2 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
ND =
= not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-19
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016C
9905034
S995034A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBIO Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
% Recovery
39 P
34 P
87 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
NS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/19/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Recovery
64 P
67 P
113 P
Recovery
NS
NS
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-20
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016C
9905034
S995034A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBIO Condensate
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluenq
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
MS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/19/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound ug
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-21
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016C
9905034
S995034A
8270
HkGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBIO Condensate
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/19/99
6/1/99
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluorantherie
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib N£> = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-22
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
9Q5191016X
9905033
S995033A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/19/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBXO XAD
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfortate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzen*(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzeni:
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisoprop yl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidir e
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
60 P
61 P
89 P
i Recovery
66
67
86
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
J
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC!)
Recovery
68 P
72 P
119 P
' Recovery
70
70
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-23
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016X
9905033
S995033A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBXOXAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopeilitadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPGC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/19/99
06/01/99
06/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound Mg
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 13
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-24
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135F
9905043
S995043A
8270
K3C/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/ Narrative
905211135SBFO Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr$ 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenoll(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopropy l)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery % Recovery
44 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 52 P
53 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 57 P
80 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 101 P
i Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
fig Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-25
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135F
9905043
S995043A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135SBFO Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthaleme
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethylphathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlor aphenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Diphenylamine
Diallate
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Phenacetin
Hexachlorobenzene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Dinoseb
Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Isodrin
Fluoranthene(CCC)
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Pyrene
Chlorobenzilate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak • below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-26
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135F
9905043
S995043A
8270
FJRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135SBFO Filter
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/21/99
6/4/99
6/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)an.thracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
9 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-27
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135X
9905044
S995044A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135BXO Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# I)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenoi(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisoprop; rl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidin s
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery
56 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
57 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
84 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
Recovery
66
67
82
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
J
J
13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC
Recovery
63 P
67 P
115 P
iRecovery
68
57
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-28
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135X
9905044
S995044A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135BXO Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethylphathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D-29
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135X
9905044
S995044A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description ^Narrative
905211135BXO Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate^CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/21/99
6/4/99
6/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib Nip = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-30
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Ouganics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135C
9905045
S995045A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135SBIO Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1,2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidin4
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery % Recovery
34 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 59 P
25 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 55 P
79 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 112 P
• Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-31
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135C
9905045
S995045A
8270
HjlGC/LRMS
Sample Descriptioi^/Narrative:
905211135SBIO Condensate
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethylphathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(i 5PCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzen 5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlordphenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/21/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
fig
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-32
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905211135C
9905045
S995045A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905211135SBIO Condensate
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/21/99
6/4/99
6/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
S(D = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spikec
D-33
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202F
9905046
S995046A
8270
I^RGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBFOBLO1 Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidijie
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
51 P
60 P
78 P
t Recovery
NS
NS
NS
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
% Recovery
59 P
62 P
106 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-34
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905241202F
9905046
S995046A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Descriptioi i/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905241202SBFOBL(|)1 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalei^e
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro jenzene
Hexachlorocyclope itadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophemol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthaleme
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethylphathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(|SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzerje
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/04/99
06/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound fig
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 8
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
5 J
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-35
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202F
9905046
S995046A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBFOBLO1 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/24/99
6/4/99
6/27/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-36
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202X
9905047
S995047A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBW2BLO1-XAD
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropj l)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidin
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
54 P
59 P
78 P
Recovery
64
66
72
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5 J
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2,5 dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
% Recovery
63
64
98
% Recovery
71
116
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
P
P
P
J
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-37
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905241202X
9905047
S995047A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905241202SBW2BLO1-XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophei iol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophejiol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l.SDinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(|SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzei ie
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlon )phenol
4-Nitrophenol(SP<:C)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-38
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202X
9905047
S995047A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBW2BLO1-XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-39
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202C
9905048
S995048A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBIOBLO1 Condensates
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery
36 P
31 P
78 P
Recovery
NS
NS
NS
MS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
<
13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
B is(2-chloroethoxy )methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Jo Recovery
56 P
55 P
118 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-40
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905241202C
9905048
S995048A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905241202SBIOBLO1 Condensates
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine I
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenoi(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran \
Pentachlorobenzejne
2,4-Dinitrotoluen i
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlo
•ophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPJCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-41
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905241202C
9905048
S995048A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905241202SBIOBLO1 Condensates
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/24/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
jo,.
not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked1
D-42
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905251144F
9905058
S9950£8A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905251144SBFOBLO1 Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
Recovery
50 P
62 P
75 P
> Recovery
NS
NS
NS
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
05/25/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
59 P
61 P
106 P
, Recovery
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-43
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905251144F
9905058
S&95058A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905251144SBFOBLO1 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalejne
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluenje
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlojrophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
11
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-44
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orinfiulsion
905:
990!
S99
;51144F
1058
>058A
8270
HRCBC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905251144SBFOBLO1 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
3 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND fc not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-45
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905251144X
9905059
S995059A
82170
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/narrative:
905251144SBXOBL( ll-XAD
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzen<
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisoprop Aether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Recovery
55 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
60 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
90 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
Recovery
61
64
86
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
J
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
61 P
65 P
114 P
Recovery
64
97
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-46
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905251144X
91)05059
SJ95059A
Date Sampled: 05/25/99
Date Extracted: 06/04/99
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905251144SBXOBL01-XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloijophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalati
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D-47
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905251144X
9905059
S995059A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905251144SBXOBL01-XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/04/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
1 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-48
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
90251144C
9905060
5995060A
iJ270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
90251144SBIOBL01 Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopro0yl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidi ie
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
39 P
35 P
77 P
Recovery
NS
NS
NS
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
% Recovery
61 P
59 P
127 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
D49
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905191016X
9905033
S095033A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905191016SBXOXAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
5/19/99
6/1/99
6/26/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
3 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-50
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
90251144C
9905060
S995060A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
90251144SBIOBL01) Condensate
|
Compound j
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzejie
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlor ophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
MS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound MS
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-51
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
90251144C
9905060
S995060A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
90251144SBIOBL01 Condensate
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/25/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
pg Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-52
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054F
9905061
S9|95061A
8^70
H^GC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBFOBLul Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzend
Benzyl Alcohol j
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery % Recovery
49 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 56 P
62 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 62 P
83 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 117 P
• Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
fig Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
2 J Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-53
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905261054F
9905061
S995061A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905261054SBFOBL01 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlo|-ophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SFJCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalati
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound Hg
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 8
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
3
J
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054F
9905Q61
S995061A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBFOBL01 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054X
9905062
S995062A
4270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBXOBL01 XAD
Pre Extraction Sut rogates
2-Fluorophenol(surrw 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzenje
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisoprofjyl)ether
2-Methylphenol |
n-Nitrosospyrrolidime
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
% Recovery
41 P
53 P
94 P
% Recovery
46
55
75
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5 J
ND
% Recovery
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 56 P
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 67 P
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 120 P
% Recovery
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol 61
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride 218
Compound fig
4-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
Nitrobenzene ND
1-Nitrosopiperidine . ND
Isophorone ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
Naphthalene ND
2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
Hexachloropropene ND
4-Chloroaniline ND
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-56
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
905261054X
9905062
S995062A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
905261054SBXOBL01 XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate!
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound Mg
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 20
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate 1
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-57
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054X
9905062
S995062A
$270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBXOBioi XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-58
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054C
9905063
S;995063A
^270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBIOBL01 Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l) 42 P
D5-Phenol(surr#2) 34 P
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5) 77 P
Pre Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
13C6-1,2 Dichlorobenzene NS
13C6-Napthalene NS
DIO-Anthracene NS
Compound ug
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol(CCC) ND
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
l,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC) ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
Benzyl Alcohol ND
Bis(2-chloroisoprobyl)ether ND
2-Methylphenol • ND
n-Nitrosospyrrolid|ne ND
Acetophenone j ND
Hexachloroethane ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
62 P
60 P
108 P
Recovery
NS
NS
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-59
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 905261054C
Lab Sample ID: 9905063
MS Data file: S995063A
Method: 8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBIOBLJ)1 Condensate
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-60
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
905261054C
9905063
3995063A
3270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
905261054SBIOBL01 Condensate
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
05/26/99
06/07/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Glassware Blank
9906001
S996001A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/01/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
Glassware Blank
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
% Recovery
71 P
80 P
90 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
NS
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2,5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
B is(2-chloroethoxy )methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
% Recovery
79 P
76 P
118 P
% Recovery
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-62
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Glassware Blank
9906001
S996001A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Glassware Blank :
i
Compound ug
2-Methylnaphthalene ND
Isosafrole ND
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC) ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC) ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene ND
2-Nitroaniline ND
3-Nitroaniline ND
Safrole ND
Acenaphthylene ND
1,4-Naphthoquinone ND
Dimethyl phathalate ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND
Acenaphthene(CCC) ND
1-Napthylamine ND
2-Napthylamine ND
4-Nitroaniline ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Dibenzofuran ND
Pentachlorobenzene ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorpphenol ND
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Fluorene ND
Diethyl phathalate ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/01/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound ug
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate 11
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-63
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Glassware Blank
9906001
S996001A
8270
HRGG/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Glassware Blank
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/01/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = ijot detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-64
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216F
9006007
S$96007A
givo
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBFOBLR6 Filter
I
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Recovery
42 P
56 P
85 P
' Recovery
NS
NS
NS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Recovery
56 P
68 P
116 P
Recovery
NS
NS
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzenej(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene|
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
fig Compound ug
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-65
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216F
9906007
S$96007A
8l?0
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluen^
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SP
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
NT) 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine
ND Diphenylamine
ND Diallate
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
ND Phenacetin
ND Hexachlorobenzene
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl
ND Dinoseb
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC)
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene
ND Phenanthrene
ND Anthracene
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND Isodrin
ND Fluoranthene(CCC)
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
ND Pyrene
ND Chlorobenzilate
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND Benzo(a)anthracene
ND
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-66
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216F
9906007
S996007A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
2 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D67
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216X
9906008
S996008A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBXOBtR6 - XAD
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenze|ne(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzdne
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopr0pyl)ether
2-Methylphenol |
n-Nitrosospyrroli4ine
Acetophenone ;
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
% Recovery
48 P
58 P
85 P
% Recovery
49
54
73
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
% Recovery
60 P
66 P
108 P
% Recovery
58
185
Hg Compound
ND 4-Methylphenol
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND Nitrobenzene
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine
ND Isophorone
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol
4 J Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND Naphthalene
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol
ND Hexachloropropene
ND 4-Chloroaniline
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
5 J n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-68
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216X
9906008
S996008A
^270
fclRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBXOBLR6 - XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(S|>CC)
Fluorene j
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 13
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
2 J
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-69
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Orimulsion
906031216X
9^06008
S996008A
8270
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ED:
MS Data file:
Method:
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBXOBI[R6 - XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/09/99
06/28/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-70
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216C
9906009
S996009B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBFOBLR6-Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10- Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopippyl)ether
2-Methylphenol j
n-Nitrosospyrrolipine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery
30 P
25 P
57 P
!> Recovery
NS
NS
NS
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
B is(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
45 P
42 P
83 P
> Recovery
NS
NS
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-71
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216C
9906009
S996009B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
i
906031216SBFOBLR6-Condensate
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound Mg
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-72
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906031216C
9906009
S996009B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906031216SBFOBLR6-Condensate
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/03/99
06/07/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
1 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
M8
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib I ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304F
9906019
S996019B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/09/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBFOBLR6 Filter
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopropy l)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
42 P
57 P
75 P
. Recovery
NS
NS
NS
fig
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1-Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
59 P
65 P
105 P
Recovery
NS
NS
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-74
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304F
9906019
S996019B
8270
HRGO/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene I
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenz 5ne
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
l,3Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/09/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1ml
1
fig Compound Mg
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 40
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
2
J
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-75
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304F
9906019
S996019B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/09/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
9 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-76
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304X
9906020
S996020B
81270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/09/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample DescriptioriVNarrative:
906041304SBXOBLR6 XAD
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzeiie
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopropy l)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexach loroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery
48 P
62 P
91 P
> Recovery
53
61
73
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
J
% Recovery
65 P
71 P
123 P
% Recovery
63
45
Compound Mg
4-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
Nitrobenzene ND
1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
Isophorone ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
Naphthalene ND
2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
Hexachloropropene ND
4-Chloroaniline ND
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-77
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304X
9906020
S996020B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBXOBtR6 XAD
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophtnol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran i
Pentachlorobenze|ne
2,4-Dinitrotoluenb
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlo
•ophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalatfe
Date Sampled: 06/04/99
Date Extracted: 06/09/99
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 5
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-78
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 906041304X
Lab Sample ID: 9906020
MS Data file: S996020B
Method: 8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBXOBLR6 XAD
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/09/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
1 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-79
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906041304C
9906021
$9960216
$270
rlRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/15/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBIOBLR6 Condensate
Pre Extraction Surrogates % Recovery
2-Fluorophenol(surir#l) 51 P
D5-Phenol(surr#2) 46 P
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5) 98 P
Pre Sampling Surrogates % Recovery
13C6-1,2 Dichlorobenzene NS
13C6-Napthalene NS
D10-Anthracene NS
Compound M£
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine ND
Methyl Methanesulfonate ND
n-Nitrosodiethylamine ND
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether ND
Ethyl methanesulfonate ND
Aniline ND
Phenol(CCC) ND
2-Chlorophenol ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
l,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC) ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
Benzyl Alcohol ND
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND
2-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine ND
Acetophenone \ ND
Hexachloroethane ND
% Recovery
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 74 P
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 74 P
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 131 P
% Recovery
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol NS
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
Compound fig
4-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
Nitrobenzene ND
1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
Isophorone ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
Naphthalene ND
2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
Hexachloropropene ND
4-Chloroaniline ND
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-80
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
13rimulsion
J06041304C
J906021
S996021B
B270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBIOBLR6 Condensate
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzfcne
2,4-Dinitrotolueijie
2,3,4,6-Tetrachl
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
)rimulsion
)6041304C
321
&96021B
3270
IGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906041304SBIOBLR6 Condensate
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/04/99
06/15/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
1 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-82
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Qrimulsion
906071229C
906024
996024B
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/08/99
06/15/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229BIOBLR6 Condensate/dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(sunf#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfanate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisoproJ3yl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery % Recovery
58 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3) 80 P
50 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4) 80 P
105 P D14-Terphenyl(surr#6) 138 F
»Recovery % Recovery
NS 13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol NS
NS 13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride NS
NS
ug Compound Mg
ND 4-Methylphenol ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
ND Nitrobenzene ND
ND 1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
ND Isophorone ND
ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
ND 2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
ND Naphthalene ND
ND 2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
ND 2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
ND Hexachloropropene ND
ND 4-Chloroaniline ND
ND Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
ND n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
ND 4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-83
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
()rimulsion
<06071229C
< 1906024
1996024B
i270
URGC/LRMS
i
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229BIOBLB|6 Condensate/dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/08/99
06/15/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound j
2-Methylnaphthal^ne
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichloroph0nol(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluenie
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlo
rophenol
4-Nitrophenol(S!fCC)
Fluorene
Diethyl phathalatje
E = exceeded calib ND = not delected
ug Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate ND
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-84
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Otganics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Ojrimulsion
906071229C
9 J06024
S596024B
8 HO
tRGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229BIOBLR6 Condensate/dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
06/08/99
06/15/99
06/29/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib |ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-85
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
906071229F
9906022
5996022A
!270
WGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229SBFOBtR6 Filter
j
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromopheilol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylarnine
Bis (2-chloroethy
) ether
Ethyl methanesulfqnate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenze
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Oripiulsion
906J071229F
99(6022
S9<>6022A
82:
0
HPGC/LRMS
Sample Description Narrative:
906071229SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorob snzene
Hexachlorocyclopen adiene(SPCC)
2,4,6-Trichlorophen< >1(CCC)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
1,3 Dinitrobenzene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
Safrole
Acenaphthylene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Dimethyl phathalate
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Acenaphthene(CCC)
1-Napthylamine
2-Napthylamine
4-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrophenol(S
PCC)
Dibenzofuran
Pentachlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC)
Fluorene |
Diethyl phathalate
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound ug
ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol ND
ND 5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
ND Diphenylamine ND
ND Diallate ND
ND 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
ND Phenacetin ND
ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
ND 4-Aminobiphenyl ND
ND Dinoseb ND
ND Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
ND Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
ND Phenanthrene ND
ND Anthracene ND
ND Di-n-butyl phthalate 6
ND Isodrin ND
ND Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
ND 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
ND Pyrene ND
ND Chlorobenzilate ND
ND p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
ND 2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND
2 J
= Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-87
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 906071229F
Lab Sample ID: 9J906022
MS Data file: S996022A
Method: ^270
IGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229SBFOBLR6 Filter
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
jig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
34 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-88
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile O^ganics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
O^imulsion
906071229X
9'K)6023
S J96023A
8170
ERGC/LRMS
Sample DescriptioifNarrative:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
906071229SBXOBIJ,R6 XAD-dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
I out of criteria
% Recovery
72 P D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
85 P 2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
surr#5) 144 F D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
Sur -ogates
2,4,6-TribromopheJiol i
Pre Extraction!
2-Fluorophenol(surr *1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenbl(si;
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobfenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Acenapthalene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamfne
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzeffle(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzeme
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopro i>y l)ether
2-Methylphenol |
n-Nitrosospyrrolid|ne
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
59
63
78
ug
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
% Recovery
87 P
91 P
144 F
% Recovery
64
29
Compound ug
4-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
Nitrobenzene ND
1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
Isophorone ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
J Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
Naphthalene 2
2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
Hexachloropropene ND
4-Chloroaniline ND
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
J n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-89
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project: Orimulsion
Sample Name: 906071229X
Lab Sample ID: ^906023
MS Data file:
Method:
;996023A
5270
1RGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
906071229SBXOB
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
,R6 XAD-dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
Compound Mg
2-Methylnaphthalene 1
Isosafrole ND
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloitobenzene ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(SPCC) ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC) ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND
l,3Dinitrobenzene ND
2-Nitroaniline ND
3-Nitroaniline ND
Safrole ND
Acenaphthylene ND
1,4-Naphthoquin(j>ne ND
Dimethyl phathaljate ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND
Acenaphthene(CCC) ND
1-Napthylamine ND
2-Napthylamine ND
4-Nitroaniline ND
2,4-DinitrophenoI(SPCC) ND
Dibenzofuran ND
Pentachlorobenzene ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ND
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Fluorene ND
Diethyl phathalate ND
Compound ug
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate 9
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-90
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
OrimUlsion
90607J1229X
9906C23
S996Q23A
8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
906071229SBXOBLR6 2 AD-dl4-Terphenyl out of criteria
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)ahthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
06/07/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
fig Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
8 J 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
"g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib ND = i lot detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
D-91
NS= not spiked
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Qrganics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Matrix Spike
9906048
•996048A
270
^RGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description/Narrative:
Matrix Spike-100 ug of PAH components only
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surt#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophertol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1,2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfanate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzeme
1,4-Dichlorobenze
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Ojrimulsion
M atrix Spike
9906048
S')96048A
8:170
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Matrix Spike-100 ug of PAH components only
Compound MS
2-Methylnaphthalene ND
Isosafrole ND
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlordbenzene ND
Hexachlorocyclop4ntadiene(SPCC) ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophehol(CCC) ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene ND
2-Nitroaniline ND
3-Nitroaniline ND
Safrole ND
Acenaphthylene 62
1,4-Naphthoquinotie ND
Dimethyl phathalate ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND
Acenaphthene(CCC) 59
1-Napthylamine ND
2-Napthylamine ND
4-Nitroaniline ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Dibenzofuran ND
Pentachlorobenzene ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluen^ ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlor[)phenol ND
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Fluorene 69
Diethyl phathalate ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound ug
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Aminobiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene 72
Anthracene 73
Di-n-butyl phthalate 10
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) 75
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene 75
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene 75
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-93
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project: Oitimulsion
Sample Name: M itrix Spike
Lab Sample ID: 9906048
MS Data file: S9 96048A
Method: 8270
HRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Matrix Spike-100 ug Of PAH components only
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate!(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Ug Compound
75 Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
72 Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
76 Benzo(ghi)perylene
77
ND
73
73
73
E = exceeded calib
jo.
not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-94
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Qrganics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Qrimulsion
latrix Spike Dup
06049
I96049A
170
.GC/LRMS
Sample Descriptioi /Narrative:
Matrix Spike Duplicate-100 ug of PAH components only
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr#l)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(sun#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Anthracene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesutfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylam|ine
Bis (2-chloroethyi) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
B is(2-chloroisopropy l)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
Recovery
NS
NS
NS
> Recovery
47
53
78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
NA
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D 14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
% Recovery
NS
NS
NS
% Recovery
49
89
Compound MS
4-Methylphenol ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND
Nitrobenzene ND
1-Nitrosopiperidine ND
Isophorone ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC) ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
Naphthalene 50
2-Nitrophenol(CCC) ND
2,6-Dichlorophenol ND
Hexachloropropene ND
4-Chloroaniline ND
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC) ND
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine ND
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC) ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-95
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Qrganics Report
Project: 0rimulsion
Sample Name: N latrix Spike Dup
Lab Sample ID: 9906049
MS Data file: S996049A
Method: 8270
JfRGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Matrix Spike Duplicjate-100 ug of PAH components only
Compound
2-Methylnaphthale ne
Isosafrole
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlor
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file: S<
Method: &
H
Oiimulsion
M
atrix Spike Dup
9006049
96049A
70
EIGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
Matrix Spike Duplicate-100 ug of PAH components only
Compound Hg Compound
NA
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
69 Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
67 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
72 Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
72
ND
67
67
67
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-97
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Organics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Rfcsin Blank
9906050
S96050A
?o
IGC/LRMS
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Sample Description'Narrative:
Resin Blank-dl4-T< rphenyl is out of criteria
Pre Extraction Surrogates
2-Fluorophenol(surr# 1)
D5-Phenol(surr#2)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol(surr#5)
Pre Sampling Surrogates
13C6-1.2 Dichlorobenzene
13C6-Napthalene
D10-Acenapthalene
Compound
n-Nitrosomethylethylamine
Methyl Methanesulfonate
n-Nitrosodiethylamine
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Aniline
Phenol(CCC)
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzen)e(CCC)
1,2-Dichlorobenzen e
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosospyrrolidine
Acetophenone
Hexachloroethane
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected
Recovery
67 P
83 P
113 P
i Recovery
58
61
87
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D5-Nitrobenzene(surr#3)
2-Fluorobiphenyl(surr#4)
D14-Terphenyl(surr#6)
13C6-2.5 Dichlorophenol
13C6-2,5-Phthalate anhydride
Compound
4-Methylphenol
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Nitrobenzene
1 -Nitrosopiperidine
Isophorone
2,4-Dimethylphenol
B is(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol(CCC)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
2-Nitrophenol(CCC)
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Hexachloropropene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene(CCC)
n-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
4-Chloro-3-methyl-phenol(CCC)
Recovery
82 P
85 P
154 F
i Recovery
59
101
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-98
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Orgahics Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
Orimulsion
Resin Blank
9906050
S996CJ50A
8270
HRG^/LRMS
i
Sample Description/Narrative:
Resin Blank-dl4-Terphenjyl is out of criteria
Compound
2-Methylnaphthalene ND
Isosafrole ND
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiiene(SPCC) ND
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(CCC) ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND
1,3 Dinitrobenzene ND
2-Nitroaniline ND
3-Nitroaniline ND
Safrole ND
Acenaphthylene ND
1,4-Naphthoquinone ND
Dimethyl phathalate ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND
Acenaphthene(CCC) ND
1-Napthylamine ND
2-Napthylamine ND
4-Nitroaniline ND
2,4-Dinitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Dibenzofuran ND
Pentachlorobenzene ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene j ND
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophe|nol ND
4-Nitrophenol(SPCC) ND
Fluorene ND
Diethyl phathalate ND
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
Compound Mg
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
5-Nitro-o-toluidine ND
Diphenylamine ND
Diallate ND
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene ND
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND
Phenacetin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
4-Amindbiphenyl ND
Dinoseb ND
Pentachlorophenol(CCC) ND
Pentachloronitrobenzene ND
Phenanthrene ND
Anthracene ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate 6
Isodrin ND
Fluoranthene(CCC) ND
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine ND
Pyrene ND
Chlorobenzilate ND
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene ND
2-Acetylaminofluorene ND
Benzyl butyl phthalate ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
E = exceeded calib ND = not detected J = Peak below the calibration range NS= not spiked
D-99
-------
APPCD Organic Support Laboratory
Semi-Volatile Of games Report
Project:
Sample Name:
Lab Sample ID:
MS Data file:
Method:
imulsion
Blank
06050
•96050A
8270
IGC/LRMS
Sample Description/Narrative:
Resin Blank-dl4-Terphenyl is out of criteria
Compound
Chrysene
di-n-Octyl phthalate(CCC)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
7,12-Dimethy lbenz(a)anthracene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Date Sampled:
Date Extracted:
Date Acquired:
Analyst:
QC reviewer:
Extract Volume
Dilution Factor
06/21/99
06/21/99
06/30/99
Bill Preston
Dennis Tabor
1 ml
1
ug Compound
ND Benzo(a)pyrene(CCC)
ND 3-Methylcholanthrene
ND Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
ND Benzo(ghi)perylene
Mg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
E = exceeded calib
D = not detected
J = Peak below the calibration range
NS= not spiked
D-100
-------
APPENDIX E
Metals Analysis Laboratory Reports
E-l
-------
ast$isSs±
PRISM
LABORATORIES, INC.
Full Service Analytical & Environmental Solutions
!
CASE NARRATIVE
08/11/99
Main Office:
449 Springbrook Road
P.O. Box 240543
Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: 704/529-6364
1/800/529-6364
Fax: 704/525-0409
CLIENT: ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
PROJECT ID: Orimulsion
LAB GROUP ID: 8401E24
SAMPLE ID: AB34730 - AB34753
MATRIX:
NUMBER OF SOURCES:
DATE COLLECTED:
DATE RECEIVED.
AIR
12
06/18-7/1/99
07/2/99
Sample Disposition:
36 containers were received on 07/2/9911:00 in the laboratory. The samples were received in good
condition.
: v.ii i^rowReferencei^J^eWir^Soi^boritorvlDs '.i
Sample Field TO k ^ ^
907010942 Train 1 sample 1
907010942 Train 1 sample 2
907010942 Train 1 sample 3
907010943 Train 1 sample 1
907010943 Train 1 sample 2
90701 0943 Train 1 sample 3
90603121 5SMFOBLR6
906031215SMNOBLR
906031215SMIOBLR6
906041303SMFOBLR6
90603121 5SMNOBLR
906031215SMIOBLR6
906071228SMFOBLR6
906071228SMNOBLR
906071226SMIOBLR6
905171200SMFFBL01
905171200SMNFBL01
905171200SMIFBL01
905181 131SMFOBL04
905181 131SMNOBL04
905181131SMIOBL04
905191016SMFOBL04
905191016SMNOBL04
905191016SMIOBL04
90521 1133SMFOBL04
90521 1133SMNOBL04
90521 1133SMIOBL04
IPrism Uaboratorv ID
AB34730
AB34731
AB34732
AB34733
AB34734
AB34735
AB34736
AB34737
AB34738
AB34739
AB34740
AB34741
AB34742
AB34743
AB34744
AB34745
AB34746
AB34747
E-2
-------
. Cross Reference of Field IDs to Laboratory IDs
Sample Field ID
905241201SMFOBL01
905241 201 SMNOBL01
905241201SMIOBL01
905251 142SMFOBL01
905251 142SMNOBL01
905251 142SM1OBL01
905261053SMFOBL01
905261053SMNOBL01
90526 1053SMIOBL01
Prism Laboratory ID
AB34748
AB34749
AB34750
AB34751
AB34752
AB34753
Sample Analysis:
The samples! were analyzed using approved USEPA methodology.
The following test method was utilized for the analysis of the samples:
Analytes
Metals
-.^•••fiM^^'i
•' : .-••iMaito '£ .-J
EPA Method 29
Ketnoai3e«Qription
::.-.A, •:••,.., ,;/-;>>.': :;;;,-':.:;:v::;-:':,;.:;v.^.:.. / -.. . •
Determination of metals emissions from stationary sources.
Analytical Fraction 1A
Samples AB34748, AB34750, AB34752, AB34734, AB34736, AB34738, AB34744 and AB34746,
were analyzed for nickel at a 1:200 dilution due to the high concentration of nickel.
Samples AB34748, AB34750, AB34752, AB34734, AB34736, AB34738, AB34742, AB34744 and
AB34746, were analyzed for vanadium at a 1:200 dilution due to the high 'concentration of vanadium.
Zinc and antimony recoveries for sample AB34748 were outside specified limits, possible matrix
interference suspected.
Zinc recoveijy for sample AB37736 was outside specified limits, possible matrix interference suspected.
The %RSD; md matrix spike recovery for nickel and vanadium on samples AB34748and AB34746 was
not calculated because of the high dilution needed.
The reporting limit standard in position 84 exhibited carry over from the previous samples. However, the
values of the associated samples were greater than 10 times the reporting limit.
Analytical Fraction 2A
The matrix Spike recovery for vanadium on sample AB34749 was outside laboratory control limits
because the spike true value was less than one fifth the sample concentration.
E-3
-------
Nickel and magnesium recoveries for sample AB34747 were outside specified limits, possible matrix
interference suspected.
If you have any questions concerning this narrative report, please call (704) 529-6364.
PRISM LABORATORIES, INC.
Helmuth M.B. Janssen
Quality Assurajnce Manager
E-A
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
H* Swvict Anilytctl t EnntMuttMt SAUJ
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCAOIS Oeraghty
2301 Rexwoods Dr.
Raleigh. NC 27607
& Miller
StelOO
Page 5 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 9920100024 00001
Customer Sample ID: M603121SFILTE
Priam Sample ID: AB34734
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Cottectton Date/Time: 6/3/99
Lab Submtttai Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytioal results have been obtained for the indicated cample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
TEST
RESULT
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29 Completed
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29 Completed
SAMPLE PREPARATION r-ORMETHO Completed
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BYMETH0028
BERYUIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD fe>
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METH >0 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOOM
NICKEL 8Y METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
UNITS
UDL
METHOD
REFERENCE
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/99 Oa.-00
7/7/99 ie«0
Completed
9.1
20
11
7.0
63
18
3000
30
210
760
29000
MOO
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
2.0
400
400
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 2B
Method 29
Method 29
Met»d29
Method 29
Meted 29
Meted 26
Method 29
Method 29
7/8/9906:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12799 08:00
7/12/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcaih. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-5
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LABORATORIES, INC.
Fill gftminl Amtylicil-1, Friv n.ui.i
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADISGeraghtyllflller
23Q1 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 6 of 24
Customer Project Nime: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: MM3121S
Prism Sample ID: AB34735
Login Group: B401E24
Sample CoHectkm Date/Time: 6/3/99
Lab Submhtal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical
results have been obtained far the Indicated sample *fcich was submitted to this laboratory.
TEST
PARAMETER
CAMPLE PREPARATION FQ* METHO
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 26
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 2 3
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 28
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 38
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOt) 2ft
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 39
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Lenten
6.4
1.7
Leu then
16
3.6
400
6J5
110
630
3200
150
UNITS
US
UO
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
1.6
14
1J5
1.5
\£
1.6
16
1.6
16
1.6
1.6
1.S
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 2B
Method 29
Method 29
Method 28
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/98 06:00
7/12/8906:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12J99 06:00
7/12/8008:00
7/12*908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12M 06:00
7/12^9 06flO
7/12*906:00
7/12*906:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overoash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-6
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
UWORATOfUEl, tkO.
KM StMM AfttyflCti» Ciwiiam
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADISGeraghty&MMer
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 7 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: W6041303HLTE
Prt*m Sample ID: AB347S6
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample CoHadion Dale/Time: 6/4/99
Lab Submtttal Data/Time: 7/2799 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHp
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 2f
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BV METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
Completed
9.1
32
20
0.0
70
30
4600
42
69
1000
46000
MOO
UNITS
ug
UQ
ug
KB
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
24
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
2.0
400
400
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 2fi
Method 29
• Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
MeewdZO
OATETIME
STARTED
7/7/99 1600
7/7/99 08*0
7/679908:00
7/12^908:00
7/1 2/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9606:00
7/12/W 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
T/12/99 00:00
7/12*9 08:00
7/12/9908:00
r/12/99 08:00
7/12MO 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OKI
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
OHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-7
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
lA»QftATOMGC. IMC.
Ful S*Mo* ArJiyumtK fcnvnnnwtiui Sourion
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraflhty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 8 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: MM41303
Prism Sample ID: AB34737
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/4/99
Lab SubmHtal Date/Time. 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical result* have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was Emitted to this laboratory:
TEST TEST
PARAMETER RESULT
ZINC BY METHOD 29 »•'
VANADIUK W METHODS* 21
NICKEL BY METHOO 29 Let* than
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29 Le«« than
MANGANESE BY METHOO 29 U« than
IRON BY METHOD 29 30
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29 i-0
COPPER BY METHOD 29 3-0
CADMIUM BY METHOD 211 3.0
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29 L*«man
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29 Lw.llwn
ARSENIC BY METHOO 29 Lew than
SAMPLE PREPARATION TORMfTHO Completed
UNITS
UO
ug
ug
ug
ug
UQ
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MOt
\£
1.6
1.5
15
1.9
16
1.6
1.5
1.S
14
1.5
1.S
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/89 08:00
7/12/990600
7/12/9908.00
7/28/99 14:47
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9906:00
7/26/99 14:47
7/26/99 14:47
7/26/09 U:47
7126m 14:47
7/26/99 14:47
7/7/9906:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OKI
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
Angela 0. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-8
-------
ab Report
PRISM
, INC.
Ful £*rv«* And/lie* * fcnvironmtna: S«ui
76
9.6
16
3D
716
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
2.0
400
400
20
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
rTHO Completed
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
M«thod29
Ma(hod29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Mathod29
M«lhod29
Method 20
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/99 16:00
7/7/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08 :OQ
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
r/B/08 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Labors tory Services
E-9
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LABORATORIES. IMC.
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 10 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 906071228
Prlwn Sample ID: AB34739
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Dale/Time: 6/7/99
Lab Submittal Dateffime: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytic^ results have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOO 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 2J-
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION TOR Mf THO
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
9.4
6.7
Less than
Lets than
Lace than
20
Less than
2.4
Less than
Less than
1.7
Less than
3 CompUWd
UNITS
og
UQ
ug
ug
UQ
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MOL
1.5
1.5
1.5
15
1.5
15
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Mathod29
Method 29
Method 2B
Method 29
Method 29
Method 2S
Method 25
Method 29
Method 29
Method 2S
Method 29
Method 26
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/0908:00
7(12/99 14:47
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/7/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
/\
. OverealTi. V.P.
Laboratory Services
E-10
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
Fun StMC* Arjlytietl ( fcnwonratrui Sourjoni
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geragnty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
The following analytical results r ave been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
Page 11 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 905271200FILTE
Prism Sample ID: AB34740
Login Group: 6401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 5/27/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 2fl
NlCKEt BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 23
IRON BY METHOD 25
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
7.5
12
Less than
Less than
2.0
33
Leas than
2.0
6.8
Less than
Less than
Less than
> Completed
UNITS
Ufl
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
"0
ug
UO
ug
ug
ug
MDL
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 26
Melhod29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/99 16.00
7/7/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7M2/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 Ofi:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08.00
7/12/9006:00
7/12/9908:00
7/8/9903:00
ANALYST
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
UHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. La
toratory Services
E-ll
-------
ab Report
PRISM
LMO*ATO*ttS.INC.
Ful Swvic* Analytical & Environmental
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Oeraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 12 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 905271200
Pfi«m Sample ID: AB34741
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 5/27/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to Ihis laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD ?9
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOO 29
MANGANESE BY METHOO 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 28
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 26
SAMPLE PREPARATION *OR METHO
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TBCT
RtSULT
1*
214
Less than
23
1.6
20
Less than
7.3
2.0
L*ts than
20
Less than
D Completed
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
«9
ug
Ufl
ug
MOL
1.8
1.5
1.5
15
1.6
15
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
METHOO
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 20
Method 20
Method 29
Method 29
Method 28
Mathod 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 U:<7
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 t<:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/7/9908.00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D- Overcast). V.P. Laboratory Services
E-12
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
L*BORATOWE«,|NC.
Ful Swvioa Aiuilytisil t EtMronmtnlai VMons
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwood* Or. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 13 of 24
Customer Project Name RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 905181131FILTE
Prism Sample ID: AB34742
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/18/99
Lab Submftlai Data/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
"BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD »
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 28
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Compiled
Lest thin
WW9
13000
2100
20
43
12
8.5
63
24
Loss than
6.3
UNITS
Ufl
HO
Ufl
ug
ug
uo
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
2.0
400
400
20
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO Completed
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
MfltlWlTA
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
717199 16:00
7/7/9906:00
7/12/9908:00
TflWM (W 00
7/12/99 08:00
7M2/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/6/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DH.I
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-13
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
l*»OlMTMIEt.lNC.
hit Saniaf Analytic*! » tnvift.«in,tnjl S»utioits
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Oeraghly & Mille
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 14 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Stmplt ID: 905181131
Priam Sample ID: AB34743
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection DateflTme: 5/18/99
Lab Submlttal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the Indicated sample \«hlch was submitted to this laboratory:
PARAMETER__
SAMPLE'PREPARATION FOR M8THO
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM 8Y METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD »
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments.
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
n»O Completed
LMtthtn
LMSthtn
Less than
Lettlton
4.6
Less than
26
Less than
Ussthan
Lest than
Less than
8.1
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
"9
ug
ug
ug
"0
MDL
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.S
18
1-5
15
1.5
1.6
1.S
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
M«thod29
Method 29
Method 29
M«lhod29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/9908:00
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/990840
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/9008:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-1A
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
lABOHATOWEt.lNC.
F.* Sow* Antiyocti « FmrfnxtnMUl Soiuifen,
Page 15 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 80'51B1016FILTE
Pritm Simple ID: AB34744
Login Group: 8401E24
SampledoaectionDate/lime: 5/19/99
Lab Submfttal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Oeraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or. Ste 100
, NC
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 20
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLUUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 20
COPPER BY METHOD 28
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments
RN 992010 0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
Completed
0.4
Last than
29
8.2
17
22
26
22
4700
15000
67000
2.0
UNITS
"9
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
UQ
ug
ug
MDL
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
400
400
2.0
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/0908:00
7/7/99 18:00
7/8/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/98 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/96 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7M2/99 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D.
sh. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-15
-------
_ab Report
PRISM
LUOIUTORIIC. INO.
Fit doraiM Anilyictt ft Envii»-ini«nul Solution!
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Oeraghty ft Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 16 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: «051«1016
Prism Sample ID: AJW4745
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/19/99
Lab Submittal DateH-ime: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results hav » been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory.
TEST T -6T
PARAMETER RESULT UNrr8
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO I Completed
ARSENIC BY METHOD» I eii than ug
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 28 11.0 UQ
BERYLUUM BY METHOD 29 I JBM than ug
CADMIUM BY METHOD 20 AM then ug
COPPER BY METHOD 29 N.7 Ufl
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29 Uttthan ug
IRON BY METHOD 29 44 ug
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29 UwtlWi ug
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29 220 Ufl
NICKEL BY METHOD 29 220 ug
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29 1100 UQ
ZINC BY METHOD 29 7.3 ug
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.1
1.S
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
15
1.5
15
1.6
1.5
1.5
METHOD
REFERENCE
hUtho029
Method 29
Method 20
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/9908:00
7/12/M 14:47
7/12/9914:47
7/12/9914:47
7/12/86 14:47
7/12/B914:47
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9914:47
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/990*00
7/12/99 06:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-16
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LUOAATMIM. INC.
Fun Stiwra Analytical & tnvircnnuifUiil Soluhor*
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 17 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 906211133FILTE
Prtwn Sample ID: AB34746
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Cotectton Date/Time: 5/21/9B
Ub SubmHtal Datefllme: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory.
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD »l
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 2fi
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
Completed
1?
LeMthan
31
7.9
15
45
96
35
4900
16000
74000
89
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Ug
ug
MDL
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
400
400
2.0
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/9908:00
717190 16:00
7/6/99 06:00
7/12/990800
7M2/99 06:00
7/12/99 08.00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9908:00
7M2/99 06:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12799 06:00
7/12/9906:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela 0. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-17
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
UUKmATOftlES.tHC.
f\M S*me* Amtyfcil & Eftyi-aniWJiSaluic.nl
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Oeraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 18 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: «0521«33
Prism Sample ID: AB34747
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 5/21/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/2/99
11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METH<|
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29 '
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Lass than
Less than
Less than
Lew than
Less than
tewuwn
27
Less than
Less than
2.0
3.2
19
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
Ufl
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
1.6
1.8
1.5
t.6
1.5
1.5
15
1.5
15
1.5
1.8
.••••
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Metnod29
Method 29
Msthod29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/99 08:00
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 14:47
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08 :00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
ANALYST
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. U boratory Services
E-18
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LMOHMOMEt, INC.
FuH Sf mo* AnHytital t Environmtnw Sotuuont
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCAOIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 19 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 9052*120lrUTE
Prism Sample ID: AB3474B
Login Group: &401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/24/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
Af ..SENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 28
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD M
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 26
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
Completed
10
Lass than
23
6.6
17
8.2
69
19
1500
16000
60000
Less than
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
UQ
MOL
2.0
2.0
0.01
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
20
400
400
2.0
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/9908:00
7/7/99 10:00
7/8/99 06:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/BO 08:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7(12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-19
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LABORATORIES, INC
Ful 6«viM Anilyik»l I Enwwjugnial &*,(<„
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 20 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 905241201
Prism Sample ID: AB34749
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Dale/Time: 5/24/99
Lab Submittal Dateffime: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytic*! results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYU.I" 'M BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 2H
COPPER BY METHOD 2«
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOll 29
NICKEL BY METTOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Lectthan
Lest than
1.8
Let»th»n
4.6
2.4
too
2,2
3000
700
3400
11
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
«9
ug
ug
ug
MOL
1.5
1-5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
15
1.5
15
1.5
1-5
1.5
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 28
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/7/9906:00
7/12/9908:00
7/129908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 06.-00
7/12/99 08.00
7/12/99 0800
7/12/99 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-20
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
uwoMToniEa, INC.
fiM Scrvn* Analytic*! & Envjronmtntil Sohmoat
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Mller
2301 Rexwoods Or, Sle 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 21 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: M525l142FILTe
Prism Sample 10: AB34750
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample CoBedtonDate/Tlme: 6/26/99 _
Lab Submlttal DatefTlme: 7/2/99 11:00
lytical results hi we been obtained for the Indicated sample which
The following analy
TEST
PARAMETER
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 20
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
BERYU-IUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO Completed
Sample Comments
RN 992010.0024
was submitted to this laboratory.
TEST
RESULT
Completed
Completed
Lett than
62000
15000
2300
*%n
20
43
8.9
Lett than
7.1
23
LMiUun
6.8
in f-MitdalBri
UNITS
m
ug
uo
"9
i M
uy
UO
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
2.0
400
400
20
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.01
2.0
2.0
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method »
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 28
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/W98 16:00
7/7/8908:00
7/12»9 08:00
7/12N9 08OO
7/12/99 OCflO
7/12S9 08.00
7/12/8908:00
7/12W9 06:00
7/12^9 08.00
7/12A9 08:00
7/12»9 08.00
7/12^908:00
7f 12/99 08:00
7/12«9 08:00
7/6«SOflK)0
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. Laboratory Services
E-21
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LABOJUTOMEI, INC.
hM Swvc* AnslyKtl 4. Enwrornwnai Solution*
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 22 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: 905251142
Prism Sample ID: AB34751
Login Group: S401E24
Sampte Collection Date^Tlme: 6/25/99
Lab Submtttal DateTTIme: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical result* have been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER dY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
IS
14
44
27
18
42
3.0
2.9
4.0
Ue»«m>n
Le«» then
l£M ton
3 COfflDi6t0d
UNITS
Ofl
UO
ug
ug
UQ
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
1.6
1*
1.5
15
1.S
15
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.5
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
-7/12/9908:00
7M2/99 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/M 08:00
7/12/9B 08:00
7/12/99 08:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9908:00
7/7/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Dvercesh, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-22
-------
Lab Report
11^^ m»oRATOme«, INC.
Fat &m
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
kMOAATOniEt, INC.
Ft* S«cn* AitttytWd A Ertvuanffltr.iftl Sotufconi
7/29/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh. NC 27607
Page 24 of 24
Customer Project Name: RN 992010.0024.00001
Customer Sample ID: S05281053
Prism Sample ID: AB34753
Login Group: 8401E24
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/26/99
Lab SubmHtal Date/Time: 7/2/99 11:00
The following analytical results have been obtained tor the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
ZINC BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
MAGNE5IU* 3Y METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 2fl
IRON BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 26
BERYLLIUM BV METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR METHO
Sample Comments:
RN 992010.0024.00001
TEST
RESULT
14
3.4
1.S
20
Leiithan
22
LASS than
7.8
1.6
Lwlhan
Lett man
Lwtthan
0 Completed
UNITS
"9
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Ufl
ug
MDL
1.5
1.S
1.5
15
1.5
15
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 20
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 26
DATE/TIME
STARTED
7/12/9906:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12799 08:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/9908:00
7/12/9906:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/96 06:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/12/99 06:00
7/7/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash. V.P. laboratory Services
E-24
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
UBORATOWES.IHC.
'
Fut Swvioa Analytical & Envi.onm.ntal Solution)
9/21/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor !
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 2 of 7
Customer Project 10: Orimulsion/RN992010.0024
Customer Sample ID: FOBLR6K
Prism Sample ID: AB37197
Login Group: 9151E7
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/3/99
Lab Submittal DateTTime: 7/29/99 14:30
The following analytical res
ills have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST ! TEST
PARAMETER , RESULT UNITS MDL
LOSS ON IGNITION 16 % 1
METHOD DATE/TIME
REFERENCE STARTED
6/5/99 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
Sample Comments:
Angela D. OTOrcasnTXTPTLaboratory Services
E-25
-------
Lab Report
PRISM
LABOKATOMEC.INC.
Full S«tv(o» Analytical & Environmental Solutions
9/21/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor \
ARCADIS Geraghty & Millar
2301 Rexwoods Dr, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 3 of 7
Customer Project ID: Orimulslon/RN992010.0024
Customer Sample ID: COBLRW1
Prism Sample ID: AB37198
Login Group: 9151E7
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6/3/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/29/99 14:30
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
"TEST
PARAMETER
LOSS ON IGNITION
TEST
RESULT
59
UNITS
%
MDL
METHOD
REFERENCE
DATEmME
STARTED
&/5/99 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-26
-------
* Report
V
•*^k UBOMTOmE«.INC.
sSBSk
Ful Swvtea Analytical t Envtanmanlal SoUkms
FRISM
9/21/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Or, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
The following analytical results hive
Page 4 of 7
Customer Project ID: Orimulslon/RN992010.0024
Customer Sample ID: FOBLC4#1
Prism Sample ID: AB37109
Login Group: 9151E7
Sample Collection Date/Time: 5/18/99
Lab SubmRtal Datemme: 7/29/99 14:30
"TEST
PARAMETER^
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
Sample Comments:
,ve been obtained for the Indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory.
TEST
oeeiii T
t\COUU 1
Completed
16
3.8
17
41
35
130
3300
55
8100
1600
7800
56000
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
MDL
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
25
2.5
25
2.5
120
120
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
8/20/9917:00
8/14/99 08:00
8/14/9908:00
8/14/9908:00
9/14/9908:00
8/14/9908:00
8/14/99 08:00
8/14/99 08:00
9/14/99 08:00
8/14/9906:00
8/14/9908:00
9/14/99 08:00
8/14/99 08:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
OHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-27
-------
ib Report
PRISM
lABORATOIIIU.INC.
Ful Service AMlytcal I Environnwnui Solution!
9/21/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr, Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
Page 5 of 7
Customer Project ID: Orimul*lon/RN992010.0024
Customer Sample ID: FOBLC4*2
Prism Sample ID: AB37200
Login Group: 9151E7
Sample Collection Date/Time: 6718/99
Lab Submtttal Datemme: 7/29/99
14:30
The following analytical results ^ave bean obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
TEST
RESULT
UNITS
LOSS ON IGNITION
Sample Comments:
12
MDL
1
METHOD
REFERENCE
DATE/TIME
STARTED
8/5/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-28
-------
b Report
PRISM
UBOIUnOMES. INC.
Ful SMvtot Ant»ytlctl I Envlioramnlal Solutions
9/21/99
Mr. Dennis Tabor
ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller
2301 Rexwoods Dr. Ste 100
Raleigh, NC 27607
The following analytical results
Page 6 of 7
Customer Project ID: Orimulslon/RN992010.0024
Customer Sample ID: FOBLdtl
Prism Samole ID: AB37201
Loain Group: 9151E7
Sample Collection Date/Time: 5/24/99
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 7/29/99
14:30
have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to Ihis laboratory.
,_ ii - -- — .— ..-..—• —•—»•• «•- -~ -- .A.K nA^rcfrtft.4C
TEST
PARAMFTF"
BOMB PREP. FOR METHOD 29
ARSENIC BY METHOD 29
ANTIMONY BY METHOD 29
BERYLLIUM BY METHOD 29
CADMIUM BY METHOD 29
COPPER BY METHOD 29
CHROMIUM BY METHOD 29
IRON BY METHOD 29
MANGANESE BY METHOD 29
MAGNESIUM BY METHOD 29
NICKEL BY METHOD 29
VANADIUM BY METHOD 29
ZINC BY METHOD 29
TEST
RESULT.
Completed
42
12
49
35
59
130
2600
90
15000
17000
79000
63000
UNITS
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Sample Comments:
MDL
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
25
2.5
25
120
120
120
METHOD
REFERENCE
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
Method 29
DATE/TIME
STARTED
6/20/9917:00
9/14/99 08:00
9/14/9908:00
9/14/9908:00
9/14/9908:00
9/14/99 08:00
9/14/9908:00
9/14/99 08:00
9/14/99 08:00
8/14/99 08:00
9/14/99 08:00
9/14/9908:00
9/14/9908:00
ANALYST
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
DHJ
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-29
-------
ab Report V PRISM
FuH SwvkM Analytical 1 EnvtronnwnUI Solutions
Page 7 of 7
9/21/99
, _ . , Customer Project ID: Orimutslon/RN992010.0024
Mr. Dennis Tabor •
Login Group: 9151E7
Raleigh, NC 27607 Sample Collection Datemme: 5/24/99
Lab SubmWal Datemme: 7/29/99 14:30
The following analytical result^ have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory.
. ! -rEif" " METHOD DATE/TIME
JSKlOT, „ WESULT .UNITS J«L. R1FERENCE__STARTED ANALYST
"" " ~ """ ' ., 4 8W9908^»0 OHJ
LOSS ON IGNITION « % .
Sample Comments:
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
E-30
-------
APPENDIX F
Orimulsion Spill References Cited by the NRC, U.S. Coast Guard, and
Environment Canada Reports
Bitor (1999). "Orimulsion spill response manual," PdVSA and Bitor America Corp., Boca Raton,
FL.
Bitor America (1997). "Orimulsion containment and recovery test carried out in Puerto La Cruz,
Anzoatgui State, Venezuela," Bitor America, Boca Raton, FL, October 1996.
Brown, J.W., Fuentes, H.R., Jaffe, R., and Tsihrintzis, V.A. (1995). "Comparative evaluation of
physical and chemical fate processes of Orimulsion and fuel oil No. 6 in the Tampa Bay marine
environment," Chapter 4, Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment - Final Report, Center for
Marine and Environmental Analysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, June 1995.
CEDRE (1996). "Orimulsion bitumen clean-up trials," Centre de Documentation de Recherche et
d'Experimentations, Brest, France, Report R.96.11.
Clement, F., Gunter, P., and Oland, D. (1997). "Trials of recovery and cleanup techniques on
bitumen derived from Orimulsion," Proceedings of the 1995 International Oil Spill Conference,
American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 89-93.
Deis, D.R., Tavel, N.G., Masciangioli, P., Villoria, C., Jones, M.A., Ortega, G.F., and Lee, G.R. (1997).
"Orimulsion: Research and testing and open water containment and recovery trials,"
Proceedings of the 1997 International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute,
Washington, DC, pp. 459-467.
Febres, G.A., Goncalves, J.A., Masciangoli, P., and Vilas, J. (1996). "Fate and behavior of
Orimulsion spilt in sea water,"unpublished report, Comparative Oil-Orimulsion Spill Assessment
Program, Volume III, Florida Power and Light Company, Miami, FL.
Guenette, C., Sergy, G., and Fieldhouse, B. (1998). "Removal of stranded bitumen from intertidal
sediments using chemical agents, Phase I: Screening of chemical agents," Environment Canada
report, Emergency Sciences Division, Environment Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (18 pp.).
Gunter, P., and Sommerville, M. (1991). "Orimulsion spill trials - Nelson Dock, Liverpool,"
NETCEN, AEA Technology/BP Research, Oxfordshire, U.K., July/August 1991.
Harper, J.R., and Kory, M. (1997). "Orimulsion sediment interaction experiments," Report to
Emergency Sciences Division, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (34 pp.).
Jokuty, P., Fieldhouse, B., Fingas, M., Whiticar, S., and Latour, J. (1998). "Characterizing the
dynamics of Orimulsion spills in salt, fresh, and brackish water "Proceedings of the 21st Arctic
and Marine Oilspill Program, Technical Seminar, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada,
pp. 33-50.
Jokuty, P., Whiticar, S., Fingas, M., Wang, Z., Doe, K., Kyle, D., Lambert, P., and Fieldhouse, B.
(1995). "Orimulsion: Physical properties, chemical composition, dispersability, and toxicity,"
Report EE-154, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jokuty, P., Whiticar, S., Wang, Z., Doe, K., Fieldhouse, B., and Fingas, M. (1999). "Orimulsion-400;
A comparative study," Report EE-160, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lorenzo, T. (1996). "Orimulsion containment and recovery tests, October 1996, Puerto La Cruz,
Venezuela," Trip report, EED Report Series No. 96, Emergencies Engineering Division,
Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ostazeski, S.A., Stout, S.A., and Uhler, A.D. (1998). "Testing and characterization of Orimulsion 400
- Volume I - Technical Report," Final report to Bitor America Corp., 44 pp., February 25, 1998.
Ostazeski, S.A., Macomber, S.C., Roberts, L.G., Uhler, A.D., Bitting, K.R., and Hiltabrand, R. (1997).
"The environmental behavior of Orimulsion spilled on water," Proceedings of the 1997
F-l
-------
International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 469-477.
Potter, T.L. (1995). "Chemistry of fuel oil #6 and Orimulsion," Chapter 14, Comparative
Ecological Risk Assessment - Final Report, Center for Marine and Environmental Analysis,
University of Miami, Miami, FL, June 1995.
Potter, T.L., Wu, J., Simmons, K., Kostecki, P., and Calabrese, E. (1997). "Chemical characterization
of the water soluble fraction of Orimulsion-in-water dispersions," Department of Food Science
and School of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Sneddon, R. (1989). "A report on a study to determine treatment options following spillage of
Orimulsion into marine and freshwater environments," Oil Spill Service Centre, Southampton,
UK.
Sommerville, M., Lunel, T., Bailey, N., Oland, D., Miles, C., Gunter, P., and Waldhoff, T. (1997).
"Orimulsion," Proceedings of the 1997 International Oil Spill Conference, American Petroleum
Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 479-487.
Wood, P. (1996). "Investigations into landspills of Orimulsion," Report by AEA Technology for
Bitor Europe (18 pp.).
F-2
-------
APPENDIX G
Additional Ecological Risk Assessment Studies
The original risk assessment by Harwell et al. (1995) was conducted for Bitor as part of their original
permit application to the State of Florida, and the document was reviewed by an independent
technical panel (chosen by EPA) for this report. The conclusions of that panel were presented in
Chapter 8.
Following the original assessment, additional studies were conducted that were not reviewed by the
independent panel. The studies for the updated assessment included:
1. Additional toxicity data on benthic organisms - Several additional benthic species indigenous to
Tampa Bay were tested for acute toxicity to Orimulsion and to No. 6 fuel oil.
2. Additional toxicity data on the surfactant - Additional toxicological tests were conducted to
evaluate the potential ecological impacts expected from exposure to the surfactant in Orimulsion
100 in the event of a spill, specifically focused on chronic life-cycle tests for endocrine
disruption effects.
3. Additional ecorisk assessment on surfactant - Based on those new chronic life-cycle tests, a risk
assessment was conducted on the ecological effects from the surfactant associated with
Orimulsion 100 in the event of a large-scale spill into Tampa Bay.
4. Additional ecorisk assessment on shallow water and nursery areas - Similarly, based on the new
acute toxicity information as well as the previous toxicity data, and using a new set of fate-and-
transport calculations, a new comparative ecological risk assessment was conducted that focused
on the risks to the shallow water critical habitats and nursery areas of Tampa Bay from
Orimulsion 100 and No. 6 fuel oil.
5. Additional assessment of risk reductions in Tampa Bay and elsewhere - An assessment was
conducted to examine the overall ecological risk reductions from fuel spills in Tampa Bay and
other estuarine ecosystems within the State of Florida.
6. Aquatic toxicity studies were conducted on Orimulsion 400. Comparative studies indicated a
similar toxicity of the two formulations.
The results of these studies were incorporated into an updated environmental risk assessment
conducted for Bitor. The key conclusions of that assessment are listed below:
1. The risks to the shallow water, critical habitats of Tampa Bay were reported as being orders-of-
magnitude lower for a major spill of Orimulsion than for a comparable spill of No. 6 fuel oil.
2. Exposures to the surfactant of Orimulsion 100 in Tampa Bay were reported as being many
orders-of-magnitudes lower than the lowest observed effect level as measured through a partial
life-cycle test using a sensitive fish species. It was concluded that a spill of Orimulsion 100
would pose no risk whatsoever for endocrine disruption of biota in Tampa Bay.
3. The updated assessment also noted that conversion from No. 6 fuel oil to Orimulsion at the
Manatee plant would shift electricity production in the rest of the State of Florida, resulting in
significant reduction in the risk of spills of #6 fuel oil in other areas of the State, including at the
Biscayne National Park, Canaveral National Seashore, and other protected waters of Florida.
4. The toxicity of Orimulsion 400 (the current formulation) is comparable to Orimulsion 100.
Further, the reformulation of the surfactant in Orimulsion 400 removes the concern regarding
potential endocrine disruption.
These conclusions were cited in a document submitted in response to comments on this report by
Bitor America (Harwell and Golder 2000). The document was prepared by the lead author of the
initial environmental risk assessment reviewed for this report (Harwell et al. 1995) and by an associate
of a technical firm that has conducted work in support of Bitor's permitting efforts in the U.S. The
submitted document provides additional detail and data, but has not been independently reviewed and
is therefore not included in its entirety as part of this report.
G-l
-------
References cited in the updated environmental assessment but not in the original assessment are listed
below.
Battelle (1998). Testing and Characterization of Orimulsion-400: Volume I - Technical Report,
Battelle, Duxbury, MA.
Bergman, H., and H. Eckert (1990). "Effect of monoethanolamine on growth and biomass
formation of rye and barley," Plant Growth Regulation 9, pp. 1-8.
Bicknell R.J., A.E. Herbison, and J.P. Sumpter (1995). "Oestrogenic activity of an environmental
persistent alkylphenol in the reproductive tract but not in the brain of rodents," J. Steroid
Biochem. Molec. Biol., 54(1/2), pp. 7-9.
Bjornestad, E., A.R. Pedersen, and S. Bowadt (1998). "Ecotoxicological characterization of
Orimulsion 400: A summary report," VKI Project No. 11020, Bitor Europe Ltd., Brentford,
Middlesex, England, 16 pages, January 1998.
Davis, J.W., and C.L. Carpenter (1997). "Environmental assessments of the alkanolamine," in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Volume 149. Springer-Verlag, New
York, N.Y.
Environmental Health Research and Testing (1987). "Screening of priority chemicals for
reproductive hazards: Monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine," report ETOX-
85-1002, Environmental Health Research and Testing, Cincinnati, OH.
Environment Canada (1998). "Orimulsion-400™ - A comparative study," prepared by
Emergencies Science Division, Environment Canada, Environmental Technology Centre, Ontario,
Canada, 27 pages.
Esclapes, M.M., et al. (1998). Unpublished data using Orimulsion-400, PDVSA-INTEVEP, Caracas,
Venezuela.
Esclapes, M.M., I. Galindo, and Y. Higuerey (1997). "Evaluacion toxicologica de nuevas
formulaciones de Orimulsion empleando bioindicadores acuaticos," report INT-4171, PDVSA-
INTEVEP, Caracas, Venezuela.
Golder Associates Geoanalysis (1999). "Orimulsion-400 and fuel Oil #6: A comparative study of
aquatic ecotoxicology," report 992210/3683 prepared for Bitor Italia S.r.l., Rome, Golder
Associates Inc., Gainesville, FL.
Johnson I.C., G.S. Ward, and H.J. Liu (1998a). "Acute toxicity of Orimulsion-400 and Orimulsion
100 to two estuarine species," report 9937563 prepared for Bitor America Corporation, Golder
Associates Inc., Gainesville, FL.
Johnson, I.C. G.S. Ward, and H.J. Liu (1998b). "Acute toxicity of Orimulsion-100 to estuarine
species," COSAP research under the sponsorship of the University of Miami, (In: Ault et al.,
1995, Chapter 10) Golder Associates Inc., Gainesville, Florida.
Johnson, I.C., C. Metcalfe, Y. Kiparissis, G. Balch, G.S. Ward, J.Wheat, J. Liu, and T. Potter (1997).
"Final report: Partial life-cycle studies using the estuarine fish sheepshead minnow to evaluate
the potential reproductive and estrogenic effects of Intan-100," presented at the SETAC 18th
Annual Meeting, Special Symposium on Endocrie Disrupters, San Francisco, California.
Knaak, J.B., H.W. Leung, W.T. Scott, J. Busch, and J. Bilsky (1997). "Toxicology of mono-, di-, and
triethanolamine," in Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Volume 149. p.
1, Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
Liberacki, A.B., T.L. Neeper-Bradley, W.J. Breslin, and G.J. Zielke (1996). "Evaluation of the
developmental toxicity of dermally applied monoethanolamine in rats and rabbits,"
Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (USA), 31(1), pp. 117-123.
Mankes, R.F. (1986). "Studies on the embryopathic effects of ethanolamine in Long-Evans rats:
preferential embryopathy in pups contiguous with male siblings in utero," Teratog Carcinog
G-2
-------
Mutagen 6, pp. 403-417.
Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, (1982). Third Edition, Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
Routledge, E.J., and J.P. Sumpter (1996). "Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their
degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen," Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15(3),
pp. 241-248.
Soto, A.M., H. Justicia, J.W. Wray, and C. Sonnenschein (1991). "p-Nonylphenol: an estrogenic
xenobiotic released from "modified" polystyrene," Environ. Health Perspectives, 92, pp. 167-
173.
Tennant, R.W., B.H. Margolin, M.D. Shelby, E. Zeiger, J.K. Haseman, J. Spalding, W. Caspary, M.
Resnick, S. Stasiewicz, B. Anderson, and R. Minor (1987). "Prediction of chemical
carcinogenicity in rodent from in vitro genetic toxicity assays," Science 236, pp. 933-941.
United States Coast Guard (1997). "Micro- and meso-scale methods for predicting the behavior of
low-API gravity oils (LAPIO) spilled in water," 1995 Oil Pollution Grants Program, Research and
Special Programs, U.S. Coast Guard, Region , 1st District, Boston, MA.
Wason, S., E. Seigel, L. Sigell, M. McElwee, and W. Pratt (1991). "Acute exposure to ethanolamine:
Lack of serious toxicity," Veterinary and Human Toxicology, 33(4), p. 371.
G-3
-------
APPENDIX H
Comparative Risk Methodology Synopsis of Harwell et al. (1995)
The NCEA review of the comparative risk assessment conducted by Harwell et al. (1995) included a
synopsis of the methodology used in the assessment. The synopsis is presented below.
1) Meteorological and tidal conditions during and following the hypothetical spill event were
input to a hydrodynamical model, based on actual records for Tampa Bay during January
1991 and August 1991. Hydrodynamical conditions during and following each scenario
spill were simulated using the NOS-based 3-D hydrodynamical model. This model provided
spatially explicit projections following a hypothetical spill scenario of the current vectors
through the Tampa bay system and the area near the mouth of the Bay.
2) These output current vectors were input to a transport model to define the current field
necessary to simulate the transport of the No. 6 fuel oil and Orimulsion. Also provided as
inputs to the Orimulsion model and the SIMAP oil spill model were parameters representing
the characteristics of the two fuel types as derived from chemical, physical, and weathering
characteristics studies, as well as from values in the literature.
3) Transport of the spilled No. 6 fuel oil as an oil slick on the surface of Tampa Bay was
simulated using the reparameterized SIMAP model analyses: the oil slick was modeled as a
set of "spillets" at variable scales of resolution.
4) A post-processing algorithm was developed to generate a map of the movement of the oil
slick over the duration of the simulation. The map of the movement of the oil slick was
transferred into the GIS facility to produce maps of the Tampa Bay region and the oil slick
coverage for each scenario analyzed.
5) Interception of the No. 6 fuel oil slick that came into contact with the shoreline was also
simulated using the SIMAP model. Scientists developed another algorithm to calculate the
amount of mass of oil slick intercepting each section of the shoreline.
6) The map of the interception of the oil slick was transferred into the GIS facility to produce
maps that superimpose the coastal areas contacted by the No. 6 fuel oil slick overlain onto the
coverage of the oil slick for each scenario analyzed.
7) The oil slick outputs could not be directly compared with the toxicological exposure-
response because there are no data to relate the amount of fuel slick present (or cumulative
value for each cell) to ecological effects. Consequently, exposure maps of a No. 6 fuel oil
slick are presented with a scalar, using shades of brown to represent the area covered during a
simulation by the oil slick. A qualitative examination of the potential effects of the oil slick
from a spill of No. 6 fuel oil was developed, considering areal extent of the slick, the area and
types of shoreline habitats intercepted by the oil slick, and historical experiences with No. 6
fuel oil spills contacting mangrove and seagrass ecosystems. Note that, since Orimulsion was
considered not to develop a significant oil slick, this analysis was not done for Orimulsion
scenarios.
8) A reformulated and reparameterized SIMAP model was used to simulate the movement of
dissolved and particulate fractions entrained into the water column following a spill of No. 6
fuel oil. For each cell in the SIMAP grid for each time step, each non-zero value of aromatic
concentration was noted. For each cell, the cumulative exposure (concentration x duration)
was calculated, based on the maximum concentration seen at any level within the 5-layer
water column during each time step. Units for the cumulative exposures are ppb-hr of
dissolved aromatics.
H-l
-------
9) Transport of spilled Orimulsion was simulated using the Orimulsion spill model. This model
simulated the 3-D movement over time throughout Tampa Bay and associated waters of the
Orimulsion particulates and dissolved fraction in the water column. The modeled fraction
used in the risk characterization was the total hydrocarbon content of the water column.
10) The output files from the Orimulsion transport model were sent for post-processing. As for
the aromatics in No. 6 fuel oil, the cumulative exposures of Orimulsion at each cell in the grid
were calculated. Units for the cumulative exposures are ppm-hr of hydrocarbons.
11) As for No. 6 fuel oil aromatics, total Orimulsion hydrocarbons were transferred to the much
higher resolution GIS and advanced visualization system for mapping and for calculations of
co-occurrence.
12) The toxicity studies on the potential effects of No. 6 fuel oil and Orimulsion on mangroves
and seagrasses were carefully examined. It was concluded that no ecologically significant
habitat alteration to the mangrove or seagrass plant communities of Tampa Bay would result
from a spill of either No. 6 fuel oil or Orimulsion. The focus then turned to an examination
of water-column effects from the two fuel types and the oil slick effects from No. 6 fuel oil.
13) The toxicological information provided by the survey, the INTEVEP project on Orimulsion,
and other literature reviews, plus the results of the toxicological experiments conducted on
seagrasses, seagrass community invertebrate inhabitants, spotted sea trout early life stages, and
mangroves, were examined to identify appropriate toxicological benchmarks for No. 6 fuel
oil and Orimulsion. The result was the selection of the spotted sea trout yolksac larvae
toxicological responses to represent the sensitive species present in the Tampa Bay ecosystem.
This selection represents a conservative but ecologically and societally important choice.
14) Data for toxicity tests on spotted sea trout yolksac larvae were analyzed to identify dose-
response and time-dependent exposure-response relationships. It was decided to use the 48-
hr toxicity test for the oil-water dispersion (OWD) fraction of both Orimulsion and No. 6 fuel
oil as most representative of conditions in Tampa Bay following a spill. In part, this decision
derived from a detailed look at the frequency distribution of cumulative time of exposures
and, in part, this decision related to the leveling off of toxicity at exposure periods exceeding
48 hours.
15) A series of steps was developed to convert from dosing to modeled conditions; for No. 6 fuel
oil, this entailed calculating from the oil-water dispersed fraction stock solution
concentrations and nominal concentrations through BTEX to aromatics concentrations
effectively seen by the test organisms; for Orimulsion, it involved going from the
concentration of Orimulsion in the dosing conditions to the total hydrocarbons simulated in
the Orimulsion transport model.
16) These conversion factors were applied to toxicity data to derive lethality rate-modeled
fraction exposure relationships. The concentrations were multiplied by 50 to represent the
associated exposure of a two-day period (comparable to 48-hr tests).
17) Using these normalized exposure data, LCio and LC95 values for aromatics for No. 6 fuel oil
and total hydrocarbons for Orimulsion were calculated using a logistic equation to fit the raw
data. The LC10 level was chosen on the assumption that no ecological responses would be
ecologically significant at changes <10%. The LC95 level was chosen to represent a
reasonable upper bound on the asymptotic logistic equation.
18) These LCio and LCgs values were used to provide the scalars for the graphical representation
of the exposure levels for each scenario simulation. By making this scaling, the graphical
outputs for No. 6 fuel oil and for Orimulsion are directly comparable in terms of effects to
the sensitive species. This allows direct, visual comparative analysis of the risks from each
H-2
-------
fuel type for each scenario.
19) These simulations were completed for all 96 scenarios, and the resultant suites of graphical
outputs were visually inspected to identify patterns with respect to the key scenario factors
(location, seasonality, and wind/current conditions).
20) Based on these considerations, four individual scenarios were selected as representative of the
types of transport and exposure regimes realized for the scenario set for each location. These
four selected scenarios were then explored much more thoroughly for detailed
ecotoxicological analyses.
21) The extensive database was entered into the GIS facility; we have acquired more than 50
separate environmental databases containing all relevant biological, ecological, and physical
information from federal, state, and local agencies concerned with management of Tampa
Bay. This extensive, unique database provides a unique capability to converge considerable
distribution data with well-defined exposure regime projects.
22) A series of steps was developed to relate the exposure and co-occurrence data for the spotted
sea trout species to population-level effects and recovery times. We conducted similar
analyses for inland silversides (i.e., the less sensitive species).
23) A series of steps was developed to use the exposure and co-occurrence information to
calculate quantitative values for comparing the risks of the two fuels to selected species in
Tampa Bay. Three approaches for integrating exposure and effects information into an
estimate of risk, derived from the EPA framework for ecological risk assessment, were used;
single value comparisons (one-dimensional models of toxicant-organism interaction); joint
distribution analysis (comparing distributions associated with estimates of exposure and
effects); and population modeling.
24) Expert judgment was applied to all sets of the risk assessment analyses to develop the
synthesis of the comparative risks to the ecological systems of Tampa Bay from a spill of No.
6 fuel oil and a spill of Orimulsion.
H-3
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Intiructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/R-Ol-056b
2.
3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Environmental Impacts of the Use of Orimulsion (R):
Report to Congress on Phase 1 of the Orimulsion
Technology Assessment Program. Volume 2
S. REPORT DATE
July 2001
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
(NRMRL-RTP). K.Dreher (NHE-
/v8eJ (NCEA-DC). and RNadeau
(NRMRL-ERT. Edison)
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
See Block 12
1O. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
NA (Inhouse)
NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF DEPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Phase I; 8/98 - 12/99
14.SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
_. , , - . Andrew Miller, Mail Drop 65, 919/
Volume 1 consists of the Executive Summary. Repdit, and Appendix A.
Volume 2 contains Appendices B-H.
6. ABSTRACT rr-i 7 : .-
ine report gives results of an evaluation of Orimulsioa. a bitumen-in-
water emulsion produced in Venezuela, to provide a better understanding of the po-
tential environmental impacts associated with its use as a fuel. Pilot-scale tests
were conducted at EPA's Environmental Research Center in Research Triangle Park
in North Carolina, to provide data on emissions of air pollutants from the combus-
tion of Orimulsion 100 (the original formulation), Orimulsion 400 (a new formulation
introduced in 1998). and No. 6 (residual) fuel oil. commonly used in the U. S. These
results, and those of full-scale tests reported in the technical literature, were eval-
uated to determine the potential air pollutant emissions and the abilit> of commer-
cially available pollution control technologies to adequately reduce those emissions.
Results indicate that carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, and pariculate matter (PM)
emissions are likely to be nearly the same as those from No. 6 fuel oil. that sulfur
dioxide emissions can increase if the Orimulsion sulfur content is higher than the
fuel it replaces, that the PM generated by Orimulsion 100 and 400 is likely to be
smaller in diameter than that generated by No. 6 fuel oil, and that hazardous air
pollutants are also likely to be similar to those from No. 6 fuel oil. Conventional
control technologies can effectively reduce emissions to very low levels.
7.
DESCRIPTORS
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
tUOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Pollution
Bitumens
Emulsions
Fuels
Combustion
Residual Oils
Emission
Carbon Monoxide
Nitrogen Oxides
Particles
Toxicity
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Orimulsion
Parti culate
13B 14G
11G 07B
07D
21D
21B 06T
8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (Ttib Repot if
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
187
2O. SECURITY CLASS (This page/
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 222O-1 (9-73)
H-4
------- |