United States Solid Waste and EPA 500-F-00-213
Environmental Protection Emergency Response July 2000
Agency (5105) www.epa.gov/brownfields/
Washington, DC 20460
»EPAThe Brownfields Economic
Redevelopment Initiative
Proposal Guidelines for
Brownfields Job Training and
Development Demonstration Pilots
-------
EPA's Brownfields Job Training and
Development Demonstration Pilots
The brownfields environmental job training and development pilots will each be funded up to
$200,000 over two years. These funds are to be used to bring together community groups, job
training organizations, educators, investors, lenders, developers, and other affected parties to
address the issue of providing training for residents in communities impacted by brownfields.
The goals of the pilots are to facilitate cleanup of brownfields sites contaminated with hazardous
substances and prepare the trainees for future employment in the environmental field. The pilot
projects must prepare trainees in activities that can be usefully applied to a cleanup employing an
alternative or innovative technology.
EPA expects to select approximately 10 Brownfields Environmental Job Training and
Development pilots by the end of December 2000. Pilot applicants must be located within or near
one of the brownfields assessment pilot communities (see Attachment A on page 12). Colleges,
universities, nonprofit training centers exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(3),
community job training organizations, states, cities, towns, counties, U.S. Territories, and
federally recognized Indian tribes are eligible to apply for the funds. EPA welcomes and
encourages applications from coalitions of such entities, but a single eligible entity must be
identified as the legal recipient. Entities with experience in providing environmental job training
and placement programs, including training in alternative or innovative cleanup technologies,
are invited to apply. The deadline for the new proposals for the 2000 environmental job
training and development pilots is October 16, 2000.
EPA's Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots
EPA defines brownfields as abandoned, idled, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities
where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental
contamination. EPA's Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative is an organized
commitment to help communities revitalize such properties both environmentally and
economically, mitigate potential health risks, and restore economic vitality to areas where
brownfields exist. Successful brownfields cleanup and redevelopment are proof that economic
development and the environment can, and indeed, must coexist.
As a part of the Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative, EPA has funded 362
Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots. The pilots are designed to empower states,
communities, tribes, and other economic redevelopment stakeholders to work together in a
timely manner to prevent, assess, safely cleanup, and sustainably reuse brownfields. EPA has
awarded cooperative agreements to states, cities, towns, counties, and tribes for demonstration
pilots that test brownfields assessment models, direct special efforts toward removing regulatory
barriers without sacrificing protectiveness, and facilitate coordinated public and private efforts at
the federal, state, tribal and local levels.
A critical part of EPA's efforts to encourage assessment and cleanup of brownfields is
participation by affected residents. In addition, EPA works to ensure that disadvantaged residents
do not bear a disproportionate burden of the effects of environmental contamination.
1
-------
Revitalization of communities that are distressed due to uncertain liabilities related to
environmental contamination typically results in improved job opportunities. This should not
cause the displacement of local disadvantaged residents due to a lack of training needed to fill
those job opportunities. To help residents take advantage of new jobs created by the assessment
and cleanup of brownfields, EPA has initiated the Brownfields Job Training and Development
Demonstration Pilots.
Authority for Brownfields Job Training Pilots
Funding for the brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration pilots is
authorized under §31 l(b)(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (CERCLA or Superfund), 42 U.S.C. 9604(d)(l). This
statute authorizes and directs EPA to carry out a program of training and an evaluation of training
needs in the procedures for the handling and removal of hazardous substances for employees who
handle hazardous waste substances training in the management of facilities at which hazardous
substances are located and in the evaluation of the hazards to human health presented by such
facilities for State and local health and environmental agency personnel. The Agency is
authorized to award grants and cooperative agreements for this purpose by CERCLA 31 l(b)(3).
Training funded under this solicitation must be in the handling and removal of hazardous
substances related to the implementation of alternative or innovative treatment technologies as
defined in section 31 l(b) (10) of CERCLA. The statute defines the term alternative or
innovative treatment technologies as: "technologies, including proprietary or patented methods,
which permanently alter the composition of hazardous waste through the toxicity, mobility, or
volume (or any combination thereof) of the hazardous waste or contaminated materials being
treated. The term also includes technologies that characterize or assess the extent of
contamination, the chemical and physical character of the contaminants, and the stresses
imposed by the contaminants on complex ecosystems at sites. "
Limitations on Use of EPA Funds
Restrictions on the use of CERCLA funding apply to brownfields environmental job training and
development demonstration pilot cooperative agreement recipients. For example, pilot funds may
not be used for training for sites contaminated by petroleum products unless they are believed to
be co-mingled with a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant (e.g., used oil). CERCLA
expressly excludes petroleum from the definition of hazardous substances. Demonstration pilot
proposals should conform to the following guidelines:
! The recipient may teach trainees skills that are relevant to the implementation of non-
alternative or non-innovative treatment technologies, provided these skills can be applied
to alternative or innovative treatment technologies as well.
! Eligible applicants include colleges, universities, nonprofit training centers, community
job training organizations, states, cities, towns, counties, U.S. Territories, and federally
recognized Indian tribes. EPA welcomes and encourages applications from coalitions of
such entities, but a single eligible entity must be identified as the legal recipient.
Nonprofit organizations must be exempt from tax under 26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(3) to be
eligible for funding.
-------
Pilot funds may be used to train residents of communities impacted by brownfields in the
procedures for the handling and removal of hazardous substances, which includes training
for jobs in sampling, analysis, and site remediation. The proposed training program must
encompass activities that can be usefully applied to a cleanup employing an alternative
or innovative treatment technology. Funds may be used for: 1) training in the
management of facilities at which hazardous substances are located; 2) training for
response activities often associated with cleanups—for example, landscaping, demolition,
and groundwater extraction—where these activities are directly related to planned
cleanups; and 3) development of curriculum for the training described in this paragraph.
Pilot funds may be used to cover administrative costs, but most of the pilot funds should
be used for hazardous waste management training.
Pilot funds may be used for outreach activities directed toward improving participation in
hazardous waste management training for communities impacted by brownfields.
Proposed training programs must establish procedures to ensure that participants are
recruited from the neighborhoods where the brownfields sites are located and graduates
from their training programs are employed in cleaning up hazardous waste facilities.
Pilot funds may be used for training participants in the use of the techniques and methods
for cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks, asbestos abatement, or lead abatement
where this training is a component of a more comprehensive hazardous waste
management training course.
Pilot applicants must be located within or near one of the 362 brownfields assessment
pilot communities (see Attachment A on page 12).
Use of pilot funds requires that training programs provide proof of non-replicability with
other established hazardous waste management training programs in their target
community. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences maintains a list of
their worker training grantees on their web site, Mi|3i//wwwjde^^
Pilot funds should, whenever possible, be used to ensure that training participants
include, but are not limited to, the unemployed, welfare to work, environmental justice
communities, and other disadvantaged populations.
Pilot funds may not be used for conducting site assessments or actual cleanups. Pilot
funds may not be used for response activities often associated with cleanups—for
example, landscaping, demolition, and groundwater extraction. Assessment, cleanup, and
associated activity costs should be funded through other means, such as state voluntary
cleanup programs, state and federal government grants, state tax incentive programs,
tribal funds, contributions from responsible parties, and prospective purchaser
agreements.
Pilot funds may not be used for general or life skills education activities, job readiness
training, GED costs, transportation costs or stipends for students, web site development,
vehicle or medical insurance, or child care costs.
-------
! As specified in Agency guidance, Pilot funds may not be used to support "lobbying"
efforts of the grantee (for example, lobbying members of Congress or state legislatures, or
lobbying for other federal grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts).
! Pilot funds may not be used to match any other federal funds unless there is specific
statutory authority for the match. CERCLA does not provide this authority. However,
pilot funds may be used to match state or local funds if authorized by the relevant state
statute or local ordinance.
Evaluation of the Proposals
The National Brownfields Job Training and Development Demonstration pilots are administered
on a competitive basis. To ensure a fair selection process, evaluation panels consisting of EPA
Regional and Headquarters staff and other federal agency representatives will evaluate the
proposals. The evaluation panels will assess how well the proposals meet the evaluation criteria
outlined below.
Proposals must be clear and decisive and strictly follow and address each of the criteria.
Sufficient detail must be provided for the panels to compare the merits of each proposal and
decide which proposals best support the intent of the pilot program. Vague descriptions,
unnecessary redundancy, and failure to address budgetary responsibility for all training,
recruitment, and placement costs may reduce the chance of a favorable rating. Incomplete
proposal packages will not be accepted. Proposals providing the best evidence of a true need, a
quality project, a proven record of job placement and student tracking, leveraging of partnerships
with public and private sources, a comprehensive budget analysis and detailed budget narrative,
and effective use of funds will have the best chance of being recommended by the panels.
Proposals must include training in the handling and removal of hazardous substances related to
innovative and alternative treatment technologies.
The panel's recommendations will be presented to EPA Senior Management for final selection.
When a proposal is selected, applicants will receive a confirmation letter, and the appropriate
EPA Regional Brownfields Coordinator and Regional Grants Specialist will be informed. The
applicant will then be asked to submit a formal cooperative agreement application package. This
package will include a formal work plan that describes the work to be performed, including a
final budget, and the required certification forms. The EPA Regional Brownfields Coordinators
and Regional Grants Specialists will work closely with the applicants to process and finalize the
cooperative agreement package Proposal funding is not guaranteed at any stage of the
proposal process until the final awards are given.
Applicants with proposals that are not selected will be informed in writing. EPA's goal is to
select a broad array of brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration
pilots that will serve as training models for other communities across the nation. EPA seeks to
identify applications that demonstrate integration of the pilots with their community's existing
brownfields cleanup and redevelopment efforts; other federal, state, tribal, and local sustainable
development programs; community revitalization programs; and pollution prevention programs.
-------
Proposal Contents
Proposals for brownfields environmental job training and development pilots should conform to
the following outline:
1.0 Cover Page (1 page)
2.0 Project Overview (Up to 2 pages)
3.0 Responses to Evaluation Criteria (Up to 10 pages)
3.1 Budget (table and narrative description)
3.2 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment
3.3 Community Involvement and Partnerships
3.4 Institutional Capacity
3.5 Training Program Goals and Plans
3.6 Measures of Success
4.0 Attachments (as appropriate; please provide an index)
4.1 Letters of Support
4.2 Abbreviated Training Course Outline
4.3 Nonprofit 501(c)(3) Status (if applicable)
Attachments that will be considered during proposal evaluation are those requested above.
Examples of attachments that will not be considered during proposal evaluation include
strategies or plans developed for other programs, advertising brochures, newspaper articles,
resolutions, statutes, and videotapes. Information in these types of attachments should be distilled
and incorporated into the responses to criteria.
To ensure fair and equitable evaluation of the proposals, please do not exceed the above, single-
sided page limitations. In addition, all materials included in the proposal (including attachments)
must be printed on letter-sized paper (8/^>" by 11"). Font sizes may be no smaller than 11 points.
Please submit two copies of your proposal, including attachments, to EPA headquarters. In
addition, please submit one copy of your proposal, including attachments, to your EPA
Regional Brownfields Coordinator (see Attachment B on page 15).
1.0 COVER PAGE
This is intended to identify the brownfields job training and development pilot applicant and a
contact for communication with EPA. This should be one page and in the format of your choice.
1.1 Project title: this should be as descriptive as possible.
1.2 Applicant identification: the name of the main implementor of your proposed training
pilot project.
1.3 Location: city, county, and state or reservation, tribally-owned lands, tribal fee lands, etc.
of your assessment pilot partner (See Attachment A on page 12). Include the names,
addresses, and phone numbers of: 1) your assessment pilot partner's mayor, county
executive, governor, tribal chair, etc.; and 2) federal Congressional representatives.
-------
1.4 Project director: name, phone number, fax/e-mail, and address of the person responsible
for the project proposal. This person will be contacted if other information is needed.
1.5 Date submitted: the date when the proposal is postmarked or sent to EPA via registered or
tracked mail.
1.6 Project period: the project period must not exceed two years.
1.7 Cooperative partners: provide names and phone numbers of individuals and organizations
that have agreed to participate in the implementation of the project. Please note that
funding to cooperative partners will be subject to compliance with applicable EPA
assistance resolutions (40 CFR Part 30 for nonprofits and universities, 40 CFR Part 31 for
states, local governments, and tribes, and 40 CFR Part 45 for training assistance).
2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Project Overview is an important opportunity to summarize your plans for the proposed
pilot. Information you provide in the Project Overview may overlap with your responses to the
evaluation criteria. Provide an overview of the following topics:
2.1 Background
! Describe your experience in providing training, particularly training in the handling of
hazardous materials.
! Include a description of how this experience relates to training in alternative or innovative
cleanup technologies.
2.2 Goals and Objectives
! Discuss the goals of your overall brownfields environmental job training and
development efforts. This should represent broader goals than those to be attained by an
EPA brownfields pilot. This should provide a context for understanding your plans for
use of pilot funding. Goals should be specific, measurable, realistic, and within a specific
time frame.
! Discuss the educational and employment objectives of the EPA-funded aspects of your
brownfields environmental job training and development demonstration pilot. Please
adhere to the limitations on the use of EPA funds (see page 2).
2.3 Project Strategy
! Provide an overview of your proposed curriculum plan, target participants, and
participation plan. Describe follow-up employment development plans, such as
recruitment, placement, and employment tracking.
! Describe the role and resources to be provided by all of your public and private partners
in the pilot. Provide documented evidence of the commitment of employers.
-------
Describe other training programs offered to your target community and demonstrate that
your program does not duplicate other existing programs.
! Describe the involvement of advisory boards or councils and other commitments to
involve the community in decision making.
3.0 RESPONSES TO EVALUATION CRITERIA
Your response to each of the following criteria will be the primary basis on which EPA selects or
rejects your proposal for one of the pilots. The proposal evaluation panels will review the
proposals carefully and assess each response based on how well it addresses each criterion.
3.1 Budget (5 points)
! Provide a comprehensive proposed budget for your training project. This should include
cost estimates for each of the proposed pilot activities to be conducted using EPA funds.
Although EPA pilot funds may be used on administration, equipment, and supplies,
emphasis should be placed on delivery of training. The proposed budget also should
include specific resource commitments from public and private partners. Provide the
names and budget estimates of committed partners who will be responsible for: 1)
nontechnical training courses (for example, life skills training); and 2) stipend or
transportation costs. The following is a suggested budget format:
EPA Pilot Funding
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Travel
Other (contractual,
supplies, etc.)
Total EPA Funds
Partner A Funding
Life Skills Training
Stipends/Transportation
Other budget categories
Partner B Funding
Budget categories
Total Partner Funds
Administration
Instruction
Outreach
Other Tasks
Total
-------
! Provide a narrative description that clearly explains the proposed use of EPA pilot funds
and funding to be provided by your collaborative partners. Each partner's role should be
clearly defined to distinguish between the use of EPA funds and funding to be provided
by your partners. If a sole source contract is being proposed as part of the EPA pilot
budget, explain why.
3.2 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment (5 points)
! Identify your brownfields assessment pilot partner (recipient of an EPA assessment pilot
grant located in your service delivery area, see page 12).
! Describe the community you propose to serve under this pilot. Provide demographic
descriptions of the population, poverty rate, unemployment rate, and minority
constituents within the service delivery area or community you are targeting in your
proposed pilot.
! Demonstrate the need for environmental training in your targeted community. The need
for training can be indicated by environmental and economic conditions, brownfields
cleanup and redevelopment activities, environmental job training planning, and
commitments from future employers to hire local residents to fill environmental cleanup
jobs.
! Explain how environmental training will impact the environmental and economic
situation in the target community.
! Indicate whether your community is located in or near an Empowerment Zone/Enterprise
Community (EZ/EC) or is classified as a small community (population <100,000).
3.3 Community Involvement and Partnerships (10 points)
! Describe your efforts to involve community-based organizations in developing this
proposal. Provide a list of the community-based organizations involved and a contact
person, phone number, and brief description of the organization's activities and
representation. These organizations may include, but are not limited to, local citizen
groups, environmental organizations, civic organizations, local business groups and
institutions, educational institutions, and local labor organizations. Letters of support
should be included as attachments. These organizations may be contacted by EPA during
the evaluation process.
! Describe how the recipient of the EPA assessment pilot grant in your service delivery
area will be involved in your proposed project.
! Describe how you plan to leverage funds and other resources to support the pilot. For
example, provide details on how you intend to fund life skills training, pre-employment
training, counseling, child care, academic enhancement, placement assistance,
transportation assistance, and other activities not funded by this grant. Letters of
commitment from your partners should be included as attachments.
-------
! Describe how the employer community (for example, local businesses, environmental
contractors, brownfields site owners) has been involved in the development of the
proposed training. This involvement could include curriculum development, advisory
councils, apprenticeships, and mentoring.
! Describe prerequisite skills or knowledge (math, science, or other related education)
required by participants in the training program. Describe partnerships with local
community groups, labor unions with apprenticeship programs, academic and other
institutions, historically black colleges and universities, and public schools located in or
near the target community that can provide the prerequisite skills or knowledge.
3.4 Institutional Capacity (5 points)
! Describe your experience and the experience of your partners in providing environmental
and other job training services to the targeted or similar communities. Include a
description of experience and capacity to provide training in alternative or innovative
treatment technologies. Describe the success of your organization in recruitment, job
training, and placement.
! Describe the certifications (for example, HAZWOPER, lead abatement, asbestos
abatement) that your organization and collaborative partners have been approved to
provide to graduates.
3.5 Training Program Objectives and Plans (10 points)
! Describe the objectives of your proposed project. Specify: 1) how many participants you
expect to train through this pilot; 2) when you expect to conduct training classes; 3) your
targeted placement rate at jobs that bear a direct correlation to the training received; and
4) the target time frame for tracking graduates (at least one year).
! Discuss your training plans and clearly describe who will conduct the environmental
training. Describe how classes will be structured and what topics will be covered,
including how innovative and alternative technologies will covered. Training in the use of
innovative and alternative technologies may be delivered via existing or new courses,
guest speakers, site visits, and other mechanisms. Descriptions and additional information
on innovative and alternative technologies are available on EPA's Technology Innovation
Office web page, at http://www.epa.gov/swertiol/index.htm. Discuss how your plan will
address skills and knowledge required in the handling and removal of hazardous
substances. Provide an abbreviated course outline as an attachment.
! Describe ordinances requiring employment of local residents (first source hiring) and how
the ordinances will affect your training and placement plans.
! Describe how you will ensure that local brownfields residents have easy access to training
facilities.
-------
3.6 Measures of Success (5 points)
! Describe how you will measure the success of your project. Discuss your plans for
establishing and demonstrating achievement of milestones and endpoints.
! Describe how your organization proposes to ensure sustainable employment, including
plans to track progress after initial job placement. Tracking of trainees should be for at
least one year.
! Describe how your organization proposes to continue environmental job training when
this pilot ends.
! Describe reports or other deliverables you plan to provide to EPA as documentation of
your project's progress and success.
10
-------
Schedule for Selecting Brownfields Job
Training and Development Pilots
Activity Schedule for Applications
July 2000 Federal Register Notice published
October 16, 2000 Proposals due to EPA
December 2000 Announcement of Pilots
Please submit two copies of your proposal, including attachments, to EPA headquarters. In
addition, please submit one copy of your proposal, including attachments, to your EPA Regional
Brownfields Coordinator (see Attachment B on page 15). Proposals must be sent to EPA by the
October 16, 2000.
If you send your proposal to EPA via registered or tracked mail, send your proposal to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OSWER Outreach and Special Projects Staff (5105)
Attn: Myra Blakely or Doris Thompson
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
If you send your proposal to EPA via an overnight express delivery service, send your proposal
to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OSWER Outreach and Special Projects Staff
Attn: Myra Blakely or Doris Thompson
401 M Street, SW, Room SE 385
Washington, DC 20460
11
-------
Attachment A.
US EPA Brownfields Assessment Pilots by State
(As of 7/00)
Alabama
Birmingham
Prichard
Uniontown
Alaska
Ketchikan Gateway
Borough
Arizona
Gila River Indian
Community
Naco Fire District
Navajo Nation
Phoenix
Tohono O'odham
Nation
Tucson
White Mountain Apache
Tribe
Arkansas
Camden *
Pulaski County *
California
Alameda County
Anaheim
State of California Trade
and Commerce Agency
Carson
Colton
East Palo Alto
Emeryville *
Gardena
Hoopa Valley Tribe
Long Beach *
Los Angeles
Lynwood
Montebello
Oakland
Pomona
Richmond
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Santa Barbara County
Signal Hill *
South Gate *
Stockton *
Ventura
West Hollywood
Union City
Colorado
Arvada *
Aurora
Englewood
Fort Collins *
Lakewood
North Stapleton
Sand Creek Corridor
Westminster
Connecticut
Bridgeport
Danbury
Haddam
Hartford
Middletown
Naugatuck Valley
New Britain
New Haven
New London *
New Milford
Norwich & Griswold
Stamford
Winsted
Delaware
Wilmington
District of Columbia
Washington, DC
Florida
Clearwater *
Escambia County
Fort Lauderdale
Fort Myers
Gainesville
Hillsborough County
Jacksonville
Miami *
Miami-Dade County
Ocala
Opa-locka *
Sarasota
St. Petersburg
Southeast Florida
Tallahassee
Tampa
Georgia
Atlanta
Augusta
East Point
Fort Valley
Macon
Hawaii
State of Hawaii
Idaho
Panhandle Health
District
Illinois
Calumet City
Canton
Chicago
Cook County
East Moline
East St. Louis
State of Illinois
Lacon
Riverdale, South Chicago
Heights, Chicago
Heights, and
Dolton/Lansing
Rockford
Waukegan
West Central Municipal
Conference
Indiana
Fort Wayne
Gary*
Hammond
State of Indiana
Indianapolis
Northwest Indiana Cities
South Bend
Iowa
Cedar Rapids
Clinton
Coralville
Des Moines
Fort Dodge
Sioux City
Waterloo
Kansas
Kansas City, KS/MO*+
Wichita
Kentucky
Covington
Louisville
Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Gretna
New Orleans
Shreveport *
Southeastern Louisiana
Regional Planning
Commission
West Monroe
Westwego
Maine
Lewiston
State of Maine
Portland
Westbrook *
Maryland
Baltimore
Baltimore County
Hagerstown
Massachusetts
Boston
Brockton
Chelsea
Chicopee
Assessment Pilots received up to $200,000 each.
*Assessment Pilots received additional $50,000 greenspace funding.
+Bi-State Assessment Pilots.
12
-------
CMEDA (Central
Massachusetts Economic
Development Authority)
Colrain
Great Barrington
Greenfield
Lawrence
Lowell *
Lynn
Maiden, Medford,
Everett
Mansfield
Marlborough
State of Massachusetts
Department of
Environmental
Protection
Methuen
Montachusett Regional
Planning Commission
New Bedford
North Adams
Pioneer Valley
Salem
Somerville
Springfield *
Taunton
Walpole
Westfield
Worcester
Michigan
Allegan *
Antrim County
Chippewa
County/Kinross
Township
Detroit
Downriver Community
Conference *
Flint
Frankfort
Jackson County
Kalamazoo *
Lansing
Muskegon Heights
Oakland County *
Saginaw *
St. Joseph/Benton
Harbor/ Benton Charter
Township
Wayne County
Ypsilanti
Minnesota
Hennepin County
Minneapolis
State of Minnesota
Red Lake Band of
Chippewa
Roseville
St. Paul Port Authority
Twin Cities
Metropolitan Council
Virginia
Mississippi
Columbia
Jackson
Oktibbeha County
Missouri
Bonne Terre
Kansas City, KS/MO*+
St. Louis
St. Joseph
Springfield
Wellston
Montana
Crow Nation
Missoula
Nebraska
Omaha
Nevada
Ely Shoshone Tribe
Las Vegas*
New Hampshire
Concord
Nashua
State of New Hampshire
State of New
Hampshire—Coastal
Piscataqua River
Watershed
New Jersey
Atlantic City
Camden
Elizabeth
Essex County
Gloucester
Hackensack
Meadowlands District
Hudson County *
Jersey City
Long Branch
Middlesex County
Morris County
Newark
Orange Township
Paterson
Pennsauken Township
Perth Amboy
Phillipsburg
Somerset County
Trenton *
Union County
New Mexico
Albuquerque
Bernalillo County
State of New Mexico
Environment
Department
Pueblo of Acoma
Rio Grande Council of
Governments, TX &
NM+
Santa Fe
Silver City *
New York
Albany
Buffalo
Elmira
Glen Cove*
Glen Falls
Johnstown
New York
Niagara County
Niagara Falls
North Hempstead
Ogdensburg
Rochester
Rome
Schenectady
Seneca Nation
Syracuse*
Troy*
Ulster County
Utica
Watertown
Yonkers
North Carolina
Burlington
Charlotte
Concord *
Fayetteville
High Point
Laurinburg *
Raleigh
Wilmington
Winston-Salem
North Dakota
Spirit Lake Nation
Turtle Mountain Band of
Chippewa
Ohio
Akron *
Barberton
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Cuyahoga County
Dayton
Elyria
Girard
Hamilton
Lima
Lockland
Mansfield
Southern Ohio Port
Authority
Springfield
Toledo
Warren
Youngstown/Campbell/
Struthers
Oklahoma
Association of South
Central Oklahoma
Goverments
Cherokee Nation of
Oklahoma *
Comanche Nation
Oklahoma City
Tulsa
Oregon
Coos Bay
Oregon Economic
Development Dept. *
Portland
Assessment Pilots received up to $200,000 each.
*Assessment Pilots received additional $50,000 greenspace funding.
+Bi-State Assessment Pilots.
13
-------
Tri-County Metropolitan
Transportation District
Pennsylvania
Borough of Central City
Bucks County
Delaware County
Duquesne
Ford City
Johnstown
Lancaster County *
Luzerne/Lackawanna
Counties
Mifflin County
Montgomery County
Neville Township
Northampton County
Philadelphia *
Pittsburgh
Reading
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Industrial
Development
Corporation
Puerto Rico Ports
Authority
Rhode Island
Providence *
State of Rhode Island
State of Rhode Island
Economic Development
Corporation
South Carolina
Anderson
Charleston
Columbia
Cowpens
Greenville
Ware Shoals
South Dakota
Sioux Falls
Yankton Sioux Tribe
Tennessee
Chattanooga
Knoxville
Memphis
Texas
Austin
Brownsville
Dallas
Fort Worth
Galveston
Grand Prairie
Houston
Laredo
Port Arthur
Rio Grande Council of
Governments, TX &
NM+
San Antonio
Tarrant County
Utah
Murray City
Ogden City
Provo
Salt Lake City *
West Jordan
Vermont
Burlington
Southern Windsor
County Regional
Planning Commission
Windham Regional
Commission, VT
Virginia
Cape Charles-
Northampton County
Newport News
Petersburg
Richmond
Shenandoah *
Washington
Aberdeen
Bellingham
Confederated Tribes of
the Colville Reservation
Duwamish Coalition
Everett
Kitsap County *
Port of Bellingham
Port of Seattle
Puyallup Tribe
Renton
Seattle/King County *
Tacoma
West Virginia
Wheeling
Wisconsin
Glendale
Kenosha
Milwaukee
Milwaukee County
Northwest Regional
Planning Commission
Oshkosh
Wausau
West Allis
State of Wisconsin
Department of Natural
Resources
Wyoming
Evanston
Kemmerer
Assessment Pilots received up to $200,000 each.
*Assessment Pilots received additional $50,000 greenspace funding.
+Bi-State Assessment Pilots.
14
-------
Attachment B. EPA HQ/Regional Brownfields Coordinators
If you have questions regarding your application, call
Myra Blakely at (202)260-4527 or Doris Thompson at (202)260-4483
Regions and States
EPA Region 1
Lynn Jennings
EPA Region 2
Larry D'Andrea
EPA Region 3
Tom Stolle
EPA Region 4
Mickey Hartnett
EPA Region 5
Deborah Orr
EPA Region 6
Stan Hitt
EPA Region 7
Tina Lowery
EPA Region 8
Kathy Atencio
EPA Region 9
Jim Hanson
EPA Region 10
Tim Brincefield
EPA Headquarters
Myra Blakely or
Doris Thompson
CT, ME, MA, NH,
RI,VT
NJ, NY, PR, VI
DE, DC, MD, PA,
VA,WV
AL, FL, GA, KY,
MS, NC, SC, TN
IL, IN, MI, MN, OH,
WI
AR, LA, NM, OK,
TX
IA, KS, MO, NE
CO, MT, ND, SD,
UT,WY
AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS,
GU
AK, ID, OR, WA
Address and Phone Number
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
One Congress Street
Suite HOO(HIO)
Boston, MA 02203
Phone (617) 918-1210 Fax (617) 918-1291
290 Broadway
18th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Phone (212) 637-4314 Fax (212) 637-4360
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone (215) 814-3129 Fax (215) 814-3254
Atlanta Federal Center
6 1 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Phone (404) 562-8661 Fax (404) 562-8628
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3507
Phone (312) 886-7576 Fax (312) 886-0753
First Interstate Bank Tower at Fountain PI.
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Phone (214) 665-6736 Fax (214) 665-6660
901 North 5th Street
Kansas City, KS 66101-2728
Phone (913) 55 1-7964 Fax (913) 551-7063
999 18th Street, Suite 500 (EPR)
Denver, CO 80202-2405
Phone (303) 312-6803 Fax (303) 312-6071
75 Hawthorne Street, H- 1
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone (415) 744-2237 Fax (415) 744-2180
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone (206) 553-2100 Fax (206) 553-0124
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (5 105)
Washington, D.C. 20460
Fax (202) 260-6606
15
-------
United States
Environmental Protection Agency (5105)
Washington, DC 20460
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
EPA500-F-00-213
July 2000
BULK RATE
POSTAGE &
FEES PAID
EPA
PERMITG-35
------- |