U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                nmental Technolo
                        ET
                       Eductor Vapor Recovery  Unit (EVRU™)
 Tlie U.S. EPA Environmental Technology Verification
 (ETV) Program's Greenhouse Gas Technology (GHG)
 Center, operated by Southern Research Institute under a
 cooperative agreement with EPA, has verified the
 performance of the Eductor Vapor Recovery Unit
 (EVRU™) manufactured by COMM Engineering, USA of
 Lafayette, Louisiana. This technology is designed to recover
 gas from storage tank vents and other low-pressure
 hydrocarbon vent sources for utilization or sale. EVRU™ is
 a closed-loop system designed to reduce or eliminate
 emissions of methane, volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and other constituents
 present in vent gas. Methane is a greenhouse gas, and HAPs
 and VOCs have significant human health effects.

 Technology Description and Verification Testing

 EVRU™ is a non-mechanical eductor (or jet pump) that
 recovers vent gas by using high-pressure motive gas to
 entrain hydrocarbon vapors from low-pressure sources.
                                  EVRU™ operates on
                                  the Venturi principle
                                  as its core element.
                                  The ETV Program
                                  conducted testing of
                                  EVRU™ at
                                  TotalFinaElf 's
                                  (TFE) El Ebanito
                                  exploration and
                                  production facility-
                                  near McAllen, Texas.
                                  The facility handles
    The COMM Engineering EVRU™ installed     separation of natural
                                  gas and crude oil
 condensate product, gas compression, and gas dehydration
 from wells within a 5-mile radius. The TFE facility's
 existing dehydrated high-pressure natural gas pipeline
 supplied the motive gas.  The recovered gas can serve as fuel
 onsite or be repressurized with a booster compressor and
 injected into a natural gas transmission line for sale. Unlike
 conventional vapor recovery systems, EVRU™ has no
 moving parts to maintain, resulting in lower maintenance
 costs and less operational downtime  and, therefore, greater
 vent gas recovery over the course of a given period.

 EVRU™ was installed to recover vent gas from a battery of
 seven storage tanks. Pnor to using the EVRU™, the TFE
 site employed a conventional vapor recovery unit (VRU) to
 recover vent gas from five fixed-roof condensate tanks and
 two gun barrel tanks. The TFE operators reported that the
 operational availability of the conventional VRU system
 ranged between 85 and 90%. During downtimes, the vapors from the
 atmosphere. For these reasons, the site elected to replace the existing
  Oil and Natural Gas Production and
     Its Regulatory Background at a
                 Glance

 Oil and natural gas condensate storage tank
 batteries at production and processing
 facilities in the United States emit an
 estimated 23.3 billion standard cubic feet per
 year (bscfy) of methane. U.S. EPA
 estimates that these batteries also emit 7,000
 tons per year of FIAPs, and more than 22,000
 tons per year of VOCs. Each of these
 pollutants can have significant
 environmental and health effects.

 Methane is 21  times more effective at
 trapping heat in the atmosphere when
 compared to CO2 over a 100-year time
 period. This physical property makes
 methane an important contributor to global
 climate change. The F£APs emitted by the oil
 and gas industries include benzene, toluene,
 ethyl benzene, and xylene (known
 collectively as BTEX compounds),  plus n-
 hexane. These pollutants have a range of
 carcinogenic and toxic effects on humans.
 VOCs contribute significantly to ozone
 formation and thus, to both human health
 and environmental degradation.

 In June 1999, EPA issued National
 Emission Standards for oil and natural gas
 production to address the effects of
 pollutants emitted by the oil and gas
 industries. Among other requirements, the
 standards call for operators to install control
 devices to reduce vent gas emissions from
 certain storage tanks. EPA estimated that
 120 storage tank batteries would be required
 to install control devices.  In addition, to
 address emissions of methane from the oil
 and natural gas industry, EPA has
 established the Natural Gas STAR Program.
 This program is a flexible, voluntary
 partnership that encourages companies
 across the natural gas and oil industries to
 adopt cost-effective technologies and
 practices that improve operational
 efficiency and reduce emissions of methane.
storage tanks were vented directly to the
system with the EVRU™.
 Gas recovery rates, annual gas savings, emission reductions, recovered gas values, and total installed cost were
 verified during testing.  Table 1 summarizes some of the performance data for EVRU™. The full verification
 report can be found at http://www.epa.gov/etv/vt-ggt.html#ogi titled COMM Engineering. USA Environmental
 Vapor Recovery Unit (EVRU).
 The ETV Program operates largely as a public-private partnership through competitive cooperative agreements with non-profit research institutes. The
program provides objective quality-assured data on the performance of commercial-ready technologies. Verification does not imply product approval or
effectiveness. ETV does not endorse the purchase or sale of any products or services mentioned in this document.

-------
Table 1. Selected Performance of the Verified EVRU™ Technology
Average Gas Recovery
Value of Recovered Gasa
Total Installed Cost of EVRU™ at Site
175Mscf/day
$650,000/year
$108,000
Other Parameters

Annual Gas Savings
Annual Reductions of:
Methane
HAPs"
Other Hydrocarbons
Compared with no recovery
system in place
64 MMscf/year
32.1
1.5
30.1
Compared with the facility's existing
vapor recovery unit that achieves
an operational availability of
90% vent gas recovery
6.4 MMscf/year
3.2
0.2
3,6
'Assumes an annual gas savings of 64 MMscf/year and a price of $5. 46 per Mscf (U.S. DOE. 2005. U.S. Natural Gas Prices. Energy Information Administration,
U.S. DOE. Accessed 15 September, http://tonto.eia. doe. gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_a. htm), and 1 ,027 British thermal units per scf for typical purchased
annual wellhead price for natural gas for 2004.
b HAP compounds include the BTEX compounds, n-hexane, and Cg naphthenes, as defined in 40 CFR Part 63
Mscf = thousand standard cubic feet MMscf = million standard cubic feet
Selected Outcomes of the Verified EVRU™ Technology

Available sales and marketing data indicate that at least 11 U.S. facilities have installed the ETV-verified
EVRU™ technology. These facilities selected the technology, at least in part, because of the ETV verification
results and outreach. The estimated benefits of these existing installations include the following:

    •  Emissions reductions of 280 million standard cubic feet per year (MMscfy) of methane, 1,700 tons per
      year of HAPs, and 21,600 tons per year of VOCs, with associated climate change and human health
      benefits

    •  Increased recovery of natural  gas with a potential economic value of approximately $6.3 million per year.

The ETV Program estimates that there are 12,670 U.S. storage tank batteries with the potential to benefit from
this technology. If 25% market penetration occurs, based on these two estimates,

    •  Up to 3,170 storage tank batteries could voluntarily install the EVRU™, in part because of
      the technology's economic benefits.

    •  These installations could reduce methane emissions by up to 6 billion standard cubic feet per year
      (bscfy), HAPs by up to 33,200 tons per year, and VOCs by up to 416,000 tons per year, with associated
      climate change and human health benefits.

    •  The estimated economic value of the recovered natural gas (which equals the emission reduction
      estimates listed previously) could equal up to $120 million per year.

The EVRU™ technology could assist up to 120 storage tank batteries in complying with EPA's
National Emission Standards.
References

U.S. EPA. 2006. ETV Case Studies: Demonstrating Program
Outcomes. EPA/600/R-06/001. January, (primary source)
http://www.epa.gov/etv/pubs/600r06001 .pdf

U.S. EPA ETV, http://www.epa.gov/etv.

Kirchgessner, David A., William A. Chatterton, and Robert
G. Richards. 2003. Vapor-Recovery Unit Passes South
Texas Field Test. Oil & Gas Journal. April 14.
http://www.sri-rtp.com/Current_Events/Joumal_Articles/OG%20Article%204-13-03.pdf

U.S. EPA Natural Star Gas Program, http://www.epa.gov/gasstar.
ETV  Greenhouse Gas Technology Center

        David Kirchgessner, EPA
      kirchgessner.david@epa.gov
             Tel: (919) 541-4021
 Jeff Barghout, Southern Research Institute
           barghout@sri.org
           Tel: (919) 806-3456
                                                                                      EPA/600/S-07/029
                                                                                          August 2007

-------