&EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation
EPA430-R-97-025
    June 1997
     1996 Compliance Report
           ACID RAIN PROGRAM
         Plants Affected by Phase I of the Acid Rain Program in 1996

-------
The                                    Title IV      1990      Air Act
            for               of             (SO2) and               (NOJ, the
                                 a             to                              the use of
                 The            a          cap on the            of SO2 that    be
by                        at                                in 1980,                   for
                              to                                                    sets
NOX-                  (to          for                                           a 2?
                         1990       The                  is                 in two
      I      in 1995 for SO2 and     for NOXS and will last until            II for both
      in 2000 and is        to            2,000      In 1996,           431             by
the SO2                                223                        for NOX, and an
         16                      by the NOX

                                 and       and           to the                   at
          In             rain           the                               and
                                           and                         SO2 and NOX
and                                      and                 to                   and


    SO2                                           a
         and                        that                                                '
the                  a             for SO2                                         and an
               cap            the                                   The
        S02                                      is a                  to         ton of
SO2.                be            or       by               or        else          in
                                                     for                         and ail
                        are        to          to      the
to

The NOX                                 is               -and          an
for all                            Is           to this
                             as                                  can     the
                 by         the                    or                             to
       at           it is                or                to
         at a                        " -

At the end                                                 the
         For the NOX                                       an
at or                     For SO2,        are       a                               .  -
         SO2              be                     to                        for the
At the                                                    the           a         in its
                         (ATS)                 or      the            SO2           In
        to 1995-1999       I                                                to
               as                  SO2              be     or       for use In

-------
 1996 Compliance Report                                                                    Page 1
TO THE

The 1996 Compliance                the        under EPA's Acid      Program during the first
                 with the NOX         and the       year     the SO2 program.
             100                  for both                           the                  set
by the Clean Air Act             of 1990.  With       to NOX,        utility
     by an        of 40        below 1990 levels,         33 percent    NOX in the process, and
             an        of 18                           the            For SO2,
                                        of 1995                       35        below 1996
         levels.

The Acid Rain         is unique in    it embodies two         types of pollution control systems,
                cap and trade, and              and control.  Though               very
          in 1996, the             S02               has        in                        to
                    the NOX                       There are                        the
programs          be      into account in any comparison, but the environmental benefit of the earlier
and                                      SO2 are a       in the                          of
properly

The early        of SO2       under the Acid     Program has       EPA to assist in the
            of other                to                 to                          at lower
costs. For         EPA is acting as a          to      the                  of the
Transport            in the             of a cap and             for NOX    will
           with the National Ambient Air Quality         for ozone.

         the                  is        to                            and              to
                          is the            of electronic                 for SO2           to
    the     and resources of market             Another           is the         of automated
electronic          to submissions of quarterly emissions reports from utilities in order to        the
          of         data.  In addition, the Acid     Program is        every      to convey
        and timely                   to the          public. This
                   on the SO2                to                              All our     is
available on our frequently                  at http://www.epa.gov/acidrain.

In the        year, EPA            to  monitor and       the      of Acid
               We             to               news.
                                                          J.
                                                     Director, Acid

-------


lii                     for      SO, and MOX in

                2,000            and                           to as "units")
         In the U.S., all 445             by the SO2 and NOX                   I
        in                met

    All 431            to S02            in 1996                       to
                  5,453,028
    65                                  and 45             1995 and 1996           that
           for                   all of the                   (5,433,351, or 99             for
             but                             as        by the

    All 239            to the NOX            in 1996
                            Two         twenty three of these units                to SO2
                     16                      for NOX.
                             I            35

             in          2.9           (or 35              the 8.3        ton              as
          by 1996                          an          3,4
     or             1995, the              of allowances         in 1996     11.7 million, of
                           only      45 percent. Actual emissions for the 431 units participating
in 1996,          by                                    (CEMS),     5.4       tons, up
             100,000                   of the 445             in 1995,
                                   I            40                      In

                                                             33
                                            The       are impressive for the first year of
                                                                 1NOX           in
                                            reducing             18        below the
                                                         in 1996,      I utility     on
                                                    dropped their              by 40
                                                  1990           an        of 0.65
                                            of NOX per       Btu                       to
                                            an        of 0.39                           the
                                                                  at the 239             for
                                            1996 resulted in         levels approximately
                                            340,000 tons (or 33               1990
              1990
                                1996

-------
1996 Compliance Report                                               	      Page 3
The                                by           in the Acid     Program         to provide
     of the                  ever         by the EPA, For the           of the
monitors were demonstrated to be accurate and their availability was excellent. Statistics reflect
monitor          of the      universe of utility             by           I           II of the
program.

    Accuracy:        98        of the        and                   the         relative  accuracy
                             on the first attempt,      the                          the
                    following monitor             SO2                  a
                    accuracy (i.e., deviation from the reference test method) of 3.3 percent;  flow
                    monitors, 3.5 percent;  and NOX monitors, 3,3
    Availability:      SO2    flow monitors        a                  of 99.0 and 99.2 percent,
                    respectively, while NOX                  a        availability of 98,5  percent.
               from 1995

Activity in the                continued to         in 1996. The volume
between unrelated parties in economically          trades          doubled from 1.9 million in 1995
to 4,4 million in 1996, More      50 percent of Phase I        utility
in a               with an                    utility, broker, or fad

In mid-1995, the average price of an allowance was about $130. By the EPA's      auction in March
of 1996, the            of a                                      to $68,        in         to
the low costs of compliance            in 1995. Also a      in the low          price was the
over compliance and the                        of allowances. By the end of 1996, however, prices
had             up     the $90 range and by April, 1997            $115,     to             to
the $90 - 100      in May 1997.

-------
 1996 Compliance
Page 4
                            1996

     is        to           all              and                                         the
                 in 1996, the                  I            for    and the
I                  for NOX.  All      ISO2                  the           to
          to                    and all      INOX       met the
by the     Air Act                    of

       1        a                                            the
             1999. The              that        the          in      1             are
                  for     SO2 and NOX         in 1997, the
    to                                 by the

                                                1
                                             I

soz
NO,
1
Compensating
Opt-in
TOE4I
1
Substitution
Early-Election

(_:_ /;..
263
182
0
445
NA
NA
NA
AM
• .. .^M?: . ;,
263
161
7
¥J1
144
95
NA
JJf
Ift9f';:'::l;
263
Variable
Variable

170
95
Variable

If ::"::-
263
Variable
Variable

171
95
Variable

-
263
Variable
Variable

171
95
Variable
Farialfc
This              the        and                             for           I
                                   on 1996         and          for     SO2 and
                                and           for SO2        and
                                          for NOX
SO,
                 431                                     for     In

          424                  and                                                in
to                                           to                     431      are      in
         A and       263                            to                     I, 161
    not               to                    II, but        to               as    of
                        and                                as

-------
1996 Compliance Report                                                                     Page 5

The core 263 utility units,         at 110 power plants, were selected by Congress In the 1990
             to the Clean Air Act             were the                and       units. These
        57        of all utility          in 1985, and had                          2.5 to 10,2 Ibs
of                             an         of 4.2                       are             to as
"Table 1 units"         they are officially       in Table I of the                              40
CFR73.10.

An          161                    in 1996                    by        Table 1      to
      as            or              units.   A unit                  I as a
      a      1      in         its         reduction            A                      I as a
             unit can provide                       to        for a Table 1                its
          below its baseline. Appendix B-1  contains a                         of substitution
             units, and Appendix B-2          the        of these units to their Table  1
             In 1996,     were 160                and one

     this     is the        of seven opt-in                 the         in July. The Opt-in
                     not         to          in the Acid             the           to      the
program on a voluntary basis,       continuous        monitoring        (CEMS), reduce their S02
          and receive their own allowances.

In 1996,           14                                             in 1995.  The        in
                      by the       ISO2          is due to the      and exit         in
                          and                   of one or     of the        263 Table 1
and the entry of opt-in sources.  In 1995,      were 182 substitution and compensating units, whereas
in 1996, the ntimber fell to 161, and       opt-in                to the program.

                       1996 SO2                      S.3

The        of                    in a particular year, the                       year's
SO2 emissions level, is the sum of allowance allocations        to sources under several provisions of
the Act. In 1996, the                         by the        for the 431                  was
8,3       tons.  However, the               SO2         level in 1996             11.7
                     8.3        1996                          the         and an          3.4
                        over, or             1995.

The initial allocation and the allowances for substitution and              units represent  the
                  to     that              to     SO2      the Acid Rain Program. Additional
          for the     1996                               the
     1993.                       in 1996                           in the Act, which are
         in        2 on the following       In                             over
years (banked allowances) are         for compliance and         in the allowable total.

-------
1996 Compliance
Page 6
                                                   2
                                   of

Allocation
Phase I
Allowances for Substitution Units
Allowance Auctions
Allowances for Compensating Units
Opt-in Allowances
Diesel Allowances
Conservation Allowances
1996
1995 ALLOWANCES
1996
• Naail&eHief: ;i;|
5,550,789
1,336,735
1,160,342
150,000
15,085
48,499
29,411
5,68?
8,296,548
3,435,789
11,732,337
||P:
if-!!:-;iiliijlliiii;i::- '; y:;:,:- :: '.'.": ' - - "W^ };-;'?ffe' «l-
Initial Allocation is the of to
on. in the
Clean Air Act and Act.
Phase I are to Phase I that
their by 90 or their reduction
obligations to units that reduce their by 90 percent.
Allowances for Substitution Units are the initial allocation granted
to Phase II units which Phase I as substitution units.
Allowance Auctions provide allowances to the that were set
in a Special the initial allowance
allocation
Allowances for Units are the initial allocation
to Phase 11 which Phase I as
units.
Opt-in Allowances are provided to the
voluntarily.
Small Diesel Allowances are to
that produce and fuel the
previous year. These can be 1999.
Conservation Allowances are to utilities that
efficiency renewable The allowances
from a special Conservation Renewable Energy Reserve set
aside when the initial allowance allocation was made.

Allowances are over 1 995 and can be
for compliance in 1996 or any year.

          in the     2000 at the               II, the                                       to the
      I     will be         and the             to               will be          to
                          the cap for all            an                              25
will be 9.48                      2000-2009.  In 2010, the cap will be                to 8.95
                  a                       half of industry-wide          in 1980.

-------
1996 Compliance Report
Page?
                     I                    SO2                             by 35

        an          in                the                           of 1995, the       !
of 1996 still         at a level               35         below 1996             as       in         3.
These                to      5.4 million     of SO2,                       45         of the 11.7
                            in 1996,            B-3        the 1996          and                 for
all       I               as well as a             to            in 1995.

                                                       3
                                      of
                                          (Millions of Tons)
   Table 1 Unite
   S 8, C Unife* 2J
   Other**    £2
   TOTALS
'88 Allocation :
S.SS
1.33 i
1.86 ;
6.74 i
'05 Emissions
'96 Allocation
4,46 S.SS
0.65
0.00
5.30
(BB Emissions
4.7?
1.18 i 0.63
1.ST 0.04
8.30
5.44
                * Th»r« w»r» 182 sybsitution and compensating units and 1995 and 161 such units in 1996,
                ** Th» source of the "other™ emissions In 198S Is the 7 opt-In units tor 7/1/96 - 12/31/96. The "other"
                  allocations in both years consist of Phase I Extension, opt-in,     di«»»l, conservation    annual
                  auction allowances.

         to 1995,  the 263  Table 1                                by approximately 315,000 tons, or 7
        in 1996,                 their           by 4          However, the 4.8
by these Table 1 units were still substantially below their 1996 allocation of 5.6 million tons.

The majority of Table 1      (54 percent)                         relative to 1995 by an         of
7,300 tons. Most of the           Table 1 units                          in               by an
        of 5,500 tons      1995 levels.  The                 Table 1                  the
              of 1995.

-------
 1996 Compliancy Report		                          Page 8

 In      of utilization,          one-third of Table 1                     levels by an         of 16
         The          159 units, however,           or          1995 utilization levels, with an
                of approximately 34 percent.

 Table 1                      for     the                             in                  1995
 and 1996.  Review of the                         in this           reveals              utilization
       to be at      a contributing factor, if not the     factor, for      of these increases.  At several
      for         the rise occurred due to                                the use
     in         to the        providing     coal                     expensively.  Another
        a utilization increase coupled with scrubber difficulties, resulting in lower removal
     in 1995. A                a                   in           occurred is    solely to a
 utilization          the unit            an         outage in 1995, but         throughout 1996.

        review of the                in          in 1996 relative to 1995            scrubber
           or                  use                    of the        The          of the
 reductions        from          in utilization,        in           by         for             or
 control upgrades.

            and                   in 1996          a                          of their
 allocation than in 1995. In 1996,      161 units were responsible for emitting approximately 630,000
     of SO2, only                  half of their 1.2 million allocation. In  1995, on the            183
 substitution and                          approximately 850,000 tons of SO2, or 65         of their
         level.

 Of the 161       in 1996, one-third                               to 1995 levels by an         of
 1,300 tons.  Almost 40 percent of the                                      by an        of 1,500
 tons. The remainder of the units           their status as

 The     of utilization          for           40         of substitution and
         ] 995 to 1996, by an        of 36 percent. These                 from less     one percent
 to over 200 percent.  Approximately 35 percent of units            a         in utilization, by an
        of 26         The           20        of substitution and
          levels of zero.

 Opt-in              48,499           in 1996 as a          of their                 levels, but
           only 37,000     to 1996          levels. These
 July I.

                                                   for

 The total       of allowances deducted in 1996 was 5,453,028, which represents approximately 65
        of all 1996            issued.  Almost all (99.6          of the         allowances were for
                  4 on the following                                        as well as the
remaining bank of 1995 and 1996 allowances.

At an               the                                           to the                      at
the                  the            a                              For the         of

-------
 1996 Compliance Report                                                                                 Page 9

                           for           at a                 the utility      allowed to         the
 proportion                                                  the        as      as                     were
              to cover the               of tons           If no                 was       EPA deducted
                             the              the      to cover                           by the
           B-4         the            for           at                 the                 apportionment
             Units         a                are                      the       for

 In 1996,        1           a total of 5,433,351                       for             Of the 431
          Unit 3 in                                     the                   for           (146,291), while
          6                          in 1995,  Fifty            not           at all        the year
              no              Half of the                    6,786             or             the
 number of allowances           at a unit     12,606.

 The            0.4          (19,67?) of                       were       for  underatilization
 caps, which are           in       in           B-5.
                                                         4
                                               >



      Table 1 Unit Accounts                                                                      7,687,094
      Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts                                                   1,244,952
      Opt-in Accounts                                                                             44,050
      Other Accounts**                                                                          2,756,241
   1996 Allowances P^dutted EOT Elusions	  5,433,351

      Table 1 Unit Accounts                                                                      4,765,251
      Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts                                                    630,810
      Opt-in Unit Accounts                                                                         37,290
   1996                                        I Pro¥isioiis***                                   19,677

      Table 1 Unit Accounts                                                                         3,178
      Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts                                                     12,093
      Opt-in Unit Accounts                                                                          4,406
                                                                                               6,279,309

      Table 1 Unit Accounts                                                                      2,918,665
      Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts                                                    602,049
      Opt-in Unit Accounts                                                                          2,354
      Other Accounts**                                                                          2,756,241
  * The number of allowances held in the Allowance Tracking System (ATS) accounts equals the number of 1996 allowances allocated (see
   Exhibit 2) plus the number of 1995 banked allowances. January 30,1997 represents the Allowance Transfer Deadline, the point in time
   at which the 1996 Phase 1 affected unit accounts are frozen and after which no transfers of 1996 allowances will be recorded. The freeze
   on these accounts is removed when annual reconciliation is complete.
 ** Other accounts refers to general accounts within the ATS that can be held by any utility, individual or other organization, and unit
   accounts for units not affected in Phase I,
***Allowances were deducted for both  underatilization and    cap provisions in 1996 (see Appendix B-5 for a thorough explanation).

-------
 1996 Compliance Report
                                              Page 10
                                                the SO2

 The          provided by the                          the 431             in 1996 to       a
 variety of                  to           SO2 reduction obligations, including scrubber installation,
     switching,                                      The         of the                 has
                   the          to overcontrol      SO2          in     to
 for use in       years,                            to
 for control by         allowances                                The flexibility in
        is                of the                                                         for all
                       in the                             one           is          to one ton
 of SO2. The                          all 431        to be in           in 1996 and
        the cost                                    as           to the     of a technological
 mandate.

 The                        a ton of SO2     the                   be         in the
           The                          to be                           the     Air Act
                          and the price of allowances       this.  The     of compliance was
                 at $400-1 QGO/ton, but         to a low of just        at the 1996
                  this low, however, the      of a                                    to $115 in
      1997, as the                      of 1996        to 1995                  In May,
      to decline                      the       in the $90-100                    observers
       lower              allowance            the first two      of the         are
 to lower                             and
         the       of allowances and                        5        the
 1994,                                                                         Corporation and
 Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental           Services.

                                                   5
                                     SO2
 Allowance Prto« In dollar*

160
                                                                   Cantor Fitzgerald
                                                                 Emission* Exchange
140
12O
1OO
 80
 60
             12/84

 12/96
Month / Yisar
6/96
                                                                       12/96

-------
1996 Compliance Report
                                        Page II
Activity in the                             the                            to      in 1996,
There           as                 in 1996 as in 1995, and the
                in                                        or
                          In                                       or
       the                                                     1,9        in 1995 to 4.4
in 1996, as       in        6.                  50                I                        in
33                           in     a        with an                                 or fuel
company.  Growth is            in the                                                   only
                        by                   all                 by                       the
               has          by       130             700,000           in 1995 to 1.6        In
1996.

                                                  6
                        of                in
     Volume of
    5,000,000
    4,000,000
    3,000,000
    2,000,000
    1,000,000
                       1994
1S9S
1996
EPA      to                         to                         in the       by quickly
efficiently recording      reported to the Agency in the Allowance Tracking System (ATS), the
                           to                              In 1996, EPA          83        of
                           24      of receipt, up            the 1995     of 81         Ninety-
                                5 days. These                          on
and           are       on the Acid     Division's         site (www.epa.gov/acidrain) on a
            in      to      inform                    Also         are
        and

-------
1996 Compliance Report
12
        235                                                                    for

           239                            to      the      I                   for NOX in
 1996.                           of "Group 1"
     boilers)        by the      IS02           in 1995. There      115 dry       wall-fired
       and 124                               in the                               239
     are      in          A and        144            1          an          95
                                  I to aid in the SO2                                       1
                      95                              by SO2           in 1995, but      no
               for SO2 in 1996.                                 for NOX                  I, In
           with the Clean Air Act. All 239 utility             by the NOX         in 1996 will
                      the      1999.

                                                           and 0,45

                          the NOX                                       on all
Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act             required EPA to         NOX
              (in        of NOX per                                                    for coal-
                       in two         In      1995, EPA            in 40 CFR     76 NOX
              for      with        1                                       ISO2
          I, Group 1                   to NOX              of 0,50          for dry
wall-fired           0.45           for                                on         1, 1996.
7     the       of Phase!             by       type.  Note                      are not
         in        7.  Early-election      are      II                                   to
        the       I           (in 1997) in          for not        to      the            II
     2008.
                                                   7
                                           to NOX             in      I
Type
Tangetttially fired Boilers
Dry Bottom Wall-fired Boilers
:
Sfamiarf
0.45
0.50
1
82
62
'
•"
42
53
      the      I                      EPA                              in                 of
NOX                               400,000
IV in         of Phase I (1996 - 1999), and                           1,170,000     in     2000
(the first year of Phase II compliance).
          'Of the original 263 Table 1 units,     are only 171 units with boilers        as Group 1 (Group 2 are not
                    Phase II), Thus, the Phase! NOr program      only     171 units. Of the 171 units, 27 units
          received a Phase I            NOX compliance under     40 CFR Part 72 or Part 76,      144 Table
          1 units      in 1996.

-------
1996 Compliance Report                                                                  Page 13

In           1996, EPA           the             of NOX              for the
II, Group !           for cell burner, cyclones, wet bottom    vertically-fired boilers,        to as
"Group 2."                        go          on        1,2000. The           1996
                           NOX reductions                890,000     by the     2000,
         the             NOX                        Title IV to a total of 2,060,000 tons
             the year 2000,

                                    I NOK

For           I        unit, a utility                  the
        in       7 (a level EPA has                          1        can       with
                     technology), or may qualify for    of three                    options which
add flexibility to the rate-based compliance

»                         A utility           the                          by          the
                 of two or more units.  This approach, which can be            year, allows
           to            at           it is                to
              at      cost,

»                                  (AEL).  A                 for a
                     if it     properly        and         low NOX                (LNBT)
             to    the        limit, but is       to                  EPA                  an
    AEL is                on                        and information about the NOX control


»         I NOX            Utilities with Group  1 boilers        in       I could qualify for two
          of         from the Phase I NOx             (1) EPA        NOX compliance
                                   by unit) to                 not      the
               in     to            40 CFR      76; and (2) EPA        NOX
              for the  year 1996 to utilities with     at which SO2     gas
                     SO2 Phase I         Plans. Twenty                   for the
               Of these, 25 will comply in 1997, one will                       1997, and one
    wiil comply         in 1998.

       8 on the         page        a         of the                         by       INOX
            for 1996.

-------
1996 Compliance Report
14
                                                      8
                                        of
• ' -" "
Standard Emission Limitation
Emissions Averaging
Alternative Emission Limitation2
SUBTOTAL
Phase I NOX Extensions for Phase I
Extension Units Installing Scrubbers
Part 76 1 NOX
TOTAL
;:;-:W«|:IJiBi8-'
46
189
4
239
24
3
266
           is the                               option. For 1996,                  22
      involving 189       INOX units.                               in                are Table 1
units; sixty are            units.  Of these, two                involved           in common stack
                     a               For six                44      the                    not
          to                           units:  all             the
     individually.            C-l          a list of 1996                              C-2          a
list of units with
NO,

           239                           Met the                        for     in

In 1996, all               to the       INOX                          in
           239                to      met the                               one of the
                     In fact,                                                   at     well below the
               as        in         9.  For a         list                            and
                  for                    see          C-3.  For a                         of EPA's
methodology for             compliance           INOX       see          C-4.
           The four units identified under the Alternative Emission Limitation (AEL) option have not yet been       a
          final limit. In 1996 they were in compliance with a temporary limit while demonstrating their lowest
          achievable NOX level. In the future, if approved for a final AEL, they will be granted a permanent limit.

-------
1996 Compliance Report
15
                                                   9
                                           In          to
_
0-10%
10% - 25%
More 25%
to StamdMtt;,./1'
:
11
19
16
"r;"
83
67
39
.; . '^PL . ' '.
_ -- "'
2
1
1
From 1990 to 1996, the        population's        NOX                      by 40 percent. As
      in        10, on             Table 1 and                      below the
      I              of 0.476                               of the 0.50               for dry
                       and 0.45          for                boilers).
                                                  1§
              in                                        to      for the 239
       NOx
      (Ib/mmBtu)
     o.e
                                                                   Weighted Average
                                                                 Emissions Limitation
                                                                         (O.476)
                           199O

                             •       1 Units Q Substitution Units

-------
1996 Compliance Report
16
                                                                    to

Total NOX                             19903 to 1996, but not as              For the 144       1
units affected in 1996 alone, NOX           reductions         1990 and 1996        about 290,000
tons, or a 38         reduction.           the 95             units4 with Group 1 boilers, the
                   to       340,000 tons.  For                  NOX
51,000 tons, or 17.5          The lower                         for                  is
            to the               of these units                            of NOX      the Table 1
            for          had                         to a                                   (NSPS)
                            the        I, Group 1        In      in  1990,      of the
             below                NOX                      by Title IV in 1996.

The graph in Exhibit 11 shows the          reduction      for Table 1     substitution units,
           NOX reductions         in 1994.

                                                     11
                                                                  for the 239

     NOx Tons
    1,200,000
    1,000,000
     eoo.ooo
     eoo.ooo
     400,000
     200,000 -
                               H Table 1 Units dl

          NOX                              33              1990 to 1996,      did not        as
much as the 40                  in                                the         of fuel      to
         electricity        the                           by               9         for       1
           The majority of the data used to calculate the baseline emission rate was short term data     from relative
          accuracy tests performed to certify NOX monitoring            Part 75. In cases where this data was not
          available, information from EPA's Air Docket No. A-95-28, utilities, the Utility Air Regulatory Group or
          EPA's National Allowance Database was used.

          4Phase 1NOX units subject to emission limits because the utility       to participate in the SCX reduction
          program by January 1, 1995.

-------
1996 Compliance
17
and 10       for                                        in              NOX
      be         to

SO2       NO,                   IN 1996

In      to      the          of SO2 and NOX                       the      Air Act and to
       the SO2                        a                    of the Acid             is to
                                                                              To
         this                       of        SO2 and NOX                           or
        are                     using Continuous                            (CEMS) (or an
                                           by     to     the


       are     to         SO2              and NOX                               are
                     to        SO2            and               NOX             on the
           are               NOX and       gas (C02 or O2)
        are        to               and                            to           the
                  and

                         of a      is the               test     (RATA),      is
for                of a CEMS and for                                           test
           the                        the "true"                   by          the
to a                                           the     gas               the      the
                           the test      the             the         All
         a                             in      to be        to               to the
             10       for SO2 and NOX, and 15        for                      1,2000, the
            will     be 10          As a               for
       a                      less    or     to 7.5       for SO2 and NOX and less     or
     to 10        for                      1,2000, the            for                will
    be 7.5         are       a                      RATA           in
                             the RATA                         as an              it
not              the                 the                      and the             the
           is due to            or to                         an         test is        to
                  are not                the              test                     is
                  low          to the                and if so, a                   is
         and       to all                                      to            is no
                     12         the                             by                in
1996.
                                               12
                                          Test

Accuracy
Median Relative Accuracy
Relative Accuracy

4.2%
3.3%
96%
	 -- ,-• -. •;:,". —
.
4.3%
3.5%
99%
-••'-'

33%
98%

-------
] 996 Compliance Report
Page 18
                  to         the           of a CEMS Is the          of hours    a
                is                and        all                    and             to
      and       an               This       is       as the                        (PMA).
       13      the                          in  1996 and            the CEMS     to
                          and NOX              are              and        the
                           by the

                                               13
                                 1996
;:;.-: .:
S02
Flow
NOX
; 1996

99.2
993
98.9

96.6
96.9
97.1
                  A                  OF

     the                                     to NOX          and                     to
SO2                                 In 1996, all 445                  not     met
                but                       an                of 340,000     of NOX     1990
            an        in           and           the                                 5
          of SO2                first         in 1995.

                                    in      of compliance, the 1996 results reveal one
                         the          for controlling SO2 and NOX: the     of overcompliance
in NOX             for 1996    not      as        as the          reductions        for S02
In      and 1996, as         in       14.

                                              14
                         of NO,                    for       I

Allowable
Actual
% Over Control
SO, Tons - 1995
8,7 million tons
5.3 million tons
40%
SO, Tons - 1996
8.3 million tons
5.4 million tons
35%
Average NO,
0.476 Ibs/mmBtu
0.39 Ibs/mmBtu
18%

-------
1996 Compliance Report                                                                     Page 19

            of                                                     and                For
         the        and       reductions of SO2                      to      in a 10-25
     in rainfall acidity in the Northeast in 19953, and               as well.6

One factor          the        of the overcompliance in the SO2 program, of course, is the ability to
use                   in the future.  The 40        of 1995               35 percent of 1996
                    not retired for compliance         can be     to cover          in a      year.
However,                 and                      are              valuable     a


The NOX                on the more traditional rate-based approach,           flexibility and
a lesser        of overcompliance.  It requires each    to achieve reductions or, at a minimum, for a
group of units to achieve an average emission rate equal to or lower than their individual limits.  This
approach      not              reductions in one year to be      in        year, and as a result, the
        to overcomply is diluted.

The                    of emissions reductions over     will     differ         the two
     the      2000      both          are in full                SO2          are          to
               to the          cap level of 8.95       tons,         NOX emissions, in the        of
an          cap, are          to rise as               are              and     sources,       are
not required to offset their emissions, are built and operated.

             differences, both the SO2 and NOX components of the Acid Rain Program          very
          in 1996. The                          at               of the         is
Through the           efforts of Phase I                by           reductions            II
          in 2000, the                of the Acid              — a 10       ton           of SO2
          and two       ton reduction of NOX          — will be achieved.
                U.S. Geological Survey, Trends in Precipitation Chemistry in the United States, 1983-94 - An
                Analysis of the      in 1995 of Phase I of the CAAA of 1990, Title IV, USGS 96-0346,
                Washington, DC, June 1996.

                US EPA,                  from               Under Title IV     1990 Clean Air Act
                                  by      Bailly, Washington, DC, December 1995.

-------
                   1996
         A:              I             in 1996

                                    The SO2

         B-l :       Substitution and              Units in the SO2 Program
         B-2:             1 Units                      and             Units in 1996
         B-3:                 and Utilization of Phase I Units, 1995 and 1996
         B-4:                    Allowance         of Phase I Units
Appendix B-5:                  Deduction: An           of Underutilization and
                   Cap Provisions
                                        NOX

         C-l :                List of Averaging     Population and
         C-2:             I NOX         Units     Compliance          for 1996
         C-3:       Compliance             and Results for the 239 NOS Affected Units in 1996
         C-4:       Description of NOX Compliance           Methodology

-------
                          A;        I                  m If 96
 AL
 AL
 AL
 FL
 FL
FL
GA
GA Bowen

GA
GA
                 MB2
ID S€»2
1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
5 / /
I / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
S / /

1 / /
2 / /

BB01 /
/
/
/ /

4 / /
5 / /
6 / /
? /
1 / /
1 / /

I / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /

1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /

1 /
2 / /
3 /
4 /

MB1 / /
U
GA



GA
GA

GA

GA


GA







IA

IA
IA

IA

IA

IA
IL



IL


IL





IL



Krift



Mcintosh
Mitchell

Scherer

Wansley


Yates







Burlington

Des Moine
George North

Milton L Kapp

Prairie Creek

Riverside
Baldwin



Coffeen


Collins





Tower



1
2
3

1
3

3

I
2

Y1BR
Y2BR
Y3BR
Y4BR
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR

1

11
1

2

4

9
j
2
3

I
2

1
2
3
4
5

7
8
9

-------
                              A:         I                     IN 1956
                              SO2  NQi
 IL
IL
IL
IL        9
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN


IN

IN
                     I
                     2
                     3
                     4
                     5
                     6
                     7
                     S

                     1
                     2

                     5
                     6
IL                   I
                     2
                     3
                     4
                     5
                     6
                     1
                     2

                     01
                     02
                     03
                     04
                     05
                     06

                    1
                    2

                    1
                    2
IL                  1
S                            MS  NOi
IN                   1         /
                     2         /
                     3         /
                     4         /
                     5         /
                     6         /"

 IN                  50        /    /
                     60        /    /
                     70        /    /
                                               IN   F B
                                               IN
 IN
                     2SO1

 IN                  1
                     2
                     3
                     4

 IN                  3
                     4
                     5
                     6

 IN          City     12

 IN                  1
                     2
                     3
                     4

 IN  R              1
                     2
                     3
                     4

 IN                  U4

 IN                  1
                     2
                     3
                     5
                     6
                                           A,2

-------
                          A?        I                 IN 1996
SX                       SO2  MOi
KS               1        /
                 2            /
                                       SX                        SO2 NOi
KS
KY
KY
                 Cl
                 C2
                 C3

                 1
                 2
KY               1
                 2
                 3

KY               2

KY               1
                 2

KY               1

KY               5

KY               1

KY               HI
                 H2
KY
KY
                 Gl
                 02
KY               10

MA               1

MA               1
MD C P
MD               1
                 2
                 3
                 4  ,

                 1
                 2
                          V
                                       MD
                  9
                  II
MJ                1
                  2

MI   J C           7
                  8

MI                1
                  2
                  3

MI                1
                                       MN  High          3
                                                         4
                                                         5
                                                         6

                                                         1
                                                         2
MO

MO

MO      River



MO

                                       MO
5

1

3
4
5

i
2
3
4

1
2
3
4

1
2
3
                                       MO               1
                                                        2

                                       MO               1
                                                        2
                                    A, 3

-------
                          At        I                  If 1996
ST
                                       ST                        SO2
MO
MO
MO
1
2
3

1
2

I
MO
                 MB2
                 MB3

MS Jack          4
                 5

MS              1
                 2

MS              1
                 2
NH
NH
NY


NY

NY


NY




NY
NY
NJ               1
                 2
                 I
                 2

                 1
                 2
                 3
                 4

                 4
                 5
                 6
NY  Port          3
                 4
                                       OH
                  13
                  14
                  15
                  16
                  91
                  92
                                                        9
                                                        10
                                                        II
                                                        12
                                       2
                                       3
                                       4

                                       1
                                       2

                                       1
                                       2
                                       3
                                       4

                                       1
                                       2
                                       3
                                       4
                                       5
                      OH               11
                                       12
                                       13

                      OH               1
                                       2
OH

OH




OH   Bay




OH


OH
                                       OH
                      OH


                      OH   JM Stuart
                 25
                 26

                 I
                 2
                 3
                 4
                                       OH              1
                                                        2
                                                        3
                                                        4
                                                        5
                                                                 S
                                    A, 4

-------

SI                           SO2  NOx
OH
                    18
                    91
                    92
                    93
                    94
OH  Miami Fort      5-1
                    5-2
                    6
                    7

OH            River 1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
OH  Miles


OH  Picway

OH
                     1
                     2
                     3
OH  RE             1
                     2
                     3
                     4
                     5
                     6
                     1
                     8
OH  Toronto
                    9
                    10
                    11
OH                 5
                    6
                    7

OH  Walter CBeckjord 5
                    6

PA  Armstrong       1
                    2

PA  Bruce Mansfield   1
                    2
                                               ST                       ro    SQZ  HQ»
                                               PA   Brunner Island     1           /    /
                                                                    2           /    /
                                                                    3           /    /
                                               PA   Cheswick
                                               PA   Mitchell
                                              PA   Portland
                                               PA   Shawville
                                              PA   Sunbury
                                              TN   Allen
                                              TN   Gallatin
                                                                    1
                                               PA    Conemaugh      1
                                                                    2

                                               PA           Ferry    1
                                                                    2
                                                                    3

                                               PA    Martins Creek     1
                                                                    2
                                                                    3
                                                                    4
                                                                    33
                                               PA   New Castle       1
                                                                    2
                                                                   1
                                                                   2

                                                                   1
                                                                   2
                                                                   3
                                                                   4

                                                                   3
                                                                   4

                                                                   1
                                                                   2
                                                                   3
                                              TN   Cumberland      1
                                                                   2

                                              TN   DuPont         JVD1
                                                    Johnsonville      JVD2
                                                                   JVD3
                                                                   JVD4
                                                                   1
                                                                   2
                                                                   3
                                                                   4
                                           A, 5

-------
                           A:        I                  IN 1996
S                        SQ2  MM
IN
UT

WI  Ataa


WI


WI

WI

WI
                  !
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6

                  8
                  9
                  10
B4
B5

3
4

1

Bl

1
2
WI       Oak       1
                  2
                  3
                  4

WI  Port           1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                           S
ST
WI                1              /
                  2              /
                  3              /
                  4              /

                  1         /   /
                  2         /   /
                  3              /

                  1         /   /
                  2         /   /
                  3         /   /

                  1         /
                  2         /

                  1         /
                  2         /
                  3         /

                  1         /
                  2         /
                  3         /

                  1         /   /
                  2         /   /

                  1         /
                  2         /
                  3         /

                  1              /
                  2              /

                  7         /
                  8         /
                                        WI
                                        WY
                                        WV
                                        WV
                                        WY
                                        WV
                                        WV  Mt
                                        WV
                                        WV
WI
WI
S
6
7
8

1
2
WI               S
                 6
                 7
                 S
                                        WV
                                        WY
                                        WY
                                                          BW71
                                                          BW72
                                                          BW73

                                                          BW91
                               S
                                     A, 6

-------
             R-l:                                                   M THE SO2

             I       of the Acid     Program, a     not originally                   II          to
                      as a                or a             unit to     fulfill the
          for one            1             by Phase I. In 1996,       were 160
and 1             unit.



A                      I as a            unit can      a Table 1 unit in        its
                                                                       at the substitution unit
       of at the Table 1              the     overall                        would
       the             of the                 A Table 1 unit              a Phase II     as a
               only if both      are       the control of the      owner or operator. For 1996, 90
Table 1                 160      II      to be substitution units. These     are      in
B.       90      1             half were        in the Midwest (IL, IN, MI, MO, OH, WI) and
      a        in the South (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS), predominantly in Georgia, as was the     in
1995. In         a               Table 1               substitution                     at the
                   to 1995,           11                      to Phase I in 1996 and 26
in               the                 of the corresponding Table 1 units.



      1                               below their        may         a compensating unit to
                              to        for the reduced utilization of the Table 1 unit. (A unit's
       is        as its                  over the years 1985-1987). A Table 1 unit may         a
      II     as a                  if the      II                 is in the Table 1  unit's
      or has a                          the Table 1 unit, and the          rate of the
unit has not                          1985.                   four                  in 1996.
                                               due to      caps, which are          in
B-5. The one             unit          for 1996 is New        Power's Brayton Point Unit 1 in
                                  by Ohio Edison's          Unit 13.        Point 1
          as a                  in 1995,       with     other units at Brayton Point and an
              at       Harbor,        New England Power plant.
                                            B-l, 1

-------
                                 B-2:          1
                                                                       W 1996

AL     EC
FL            	

QA
OA    Hammond
GA     Hammond
GA    Hammond
GA    Jack Mcdonoueh
GA    Yates
GA     Yates
GA    Yates
GA    Yates
EL     Baldwin
IL
IL     Kincaid
IL
                                   Units
                                               Si
6601,6602,8603
GA

GA

GA

GA
Bowen

Bowen

Bowen

Bowen
1BLR

2BLR

3BLR

4BLR
                                            MB2
                                           Y2BR
                                           Y3BR
                                           Y4BR
          Y5BR
             1,2
                                               5

                                   AL
        Gadsden
                                                                    GA     Harllee Branch
                                                                    GA
                                           Harllee Branch
                                                                    GA      Harllee Branch
                                   OA	Arkwright
                                   OA     Arkwright
                                   GA	Arkwright_
                                   GA     Arkwright
                                   GA
                                   GA     Kraft
                                   GA
                                   GA
GA     Melntosh

EL
FL

GA
Crist
Scholz

Harllee Branch
4,5
1,2

1
                                                                                   4]
WY

IL
IL

EL
Wyodak

Havana
Wood River

Hsanepin
BW91

1,2JA5,6,?..8
1

1
IL
IL

IL
IL
IL
IL
Collins
9

Mcredosla
Hutsott¥ille
Newton
Tower
IA3A5
5

1,2,3,4,6
5,6
1^
7,8
                                                       B-2, 1

-------
B-2:         1
  AND                          M1996
State
I IL

Vermilion


State


Name
Vermilion
Units
1

IN
Petersburg

1,2 [
lifc rw
pP"1 j JJN
H T Pritchard
5

KY
Coleman
PI ri


j MD
C P Crane


thin. I*'^5'
ipP* j Jhfc, i
R D Green
Gl,02

llh* TLf*£

R D Morrow
1,2

MD
Poii


.. -itofc ^fn

Point
4

fli)"
Morgantoi



| MI
J H Camp
u_IJ 1 <•)


[ MN
High Bridj
Tf f '
;e oj

MO
James Riv
»r ^


f MO

MO
MO

MO
Labadie

Montrose
Sioux

Sibley
1 •> 3 A 	
'j^p/*

1 *? *% 1
u

•>


| MO
MS
Thomas Hi

Jack Watsc
11 MR! MR*"*


me


NH
Mernmaok
	


	 NY
NY
Dunkirk

_NOTthjwri
1-4


1 1 ^
lytjrl 	 ~~

OH
Ashtabula
7


ni4

w
fcfc» ?,ffr>
^- MIJ

hta.. Ti /FT
M
MOt
! M

tjaHnf, "ftfM
MN

fcfc h(fOi
MO
Chalk Point

Dan E Karri
J R Whiting
JH Campbell
JC Weadock

High Bridge
Sherbume County

James River
Southwest
3

1,2
13
3
7,8

3,4,5
1,2

3,4
1

Ifcfc ' MO
MO

1 j^Q
i KS

Stan. B.jfO

Meramec
Rush Island

Hawthorn
La Cygne

Siblev
1,2,3,4 i
U

5
1

1,2

hfci.. Tii iffl


fch. iijfp

Thomas Hill

Victor J Daniel
MB3J

2l

lull, TsTTT
MA

Ifc ' MV
NY
Newington
Mount Tom

Oswego
Roseton
1

4,5,6
12

Hfej,, MV

Northport
4l

fcte. flTT
OH
OH

	 Hit. mi
Shore
Bay Shore


1 8 ,9 1,92,93, 94 |
1,2,3.4

€\ 1 A
                 B-2, 2

-------
1-2:        1
                               IN 1996



OH
Conesi


	 /-VPT ! \M CJttiirt -1^-54


OH
OH
OH
OH
Edgewater 13
R B 5,6,7,8
WHSammis 5,6,7

OH
Miami
Fort - 7 • 	

OH
Picwa\
9


PA
H^sf
Armstrong 1 	

Armstr


one 2 	

PA
PA
Hatfiel

Martin
J- T" •»



a Creek 1^2

WI

WI
Edgew

Genoa
-* ,r j.


i


WI
Nelson
D „,,.„,, i ^ i


WI
WI


ft
V

South Oak Creek 5 	

wv
Albrigh



wv
wv
FortM<

Harriso






wv
Harriso


OH 11,12
OH 25,26
OH 9,10,11
PA L2
PA 1 ,2

	 ^ ICY 2

Ifcta POT Pnatnn 1 *> "I


— 	 |l»* [ WV Albright 1







fthhk ' 4^*
	 P*° PA Mai tin B Creek 3S4

Iteu. : l^r? Pj4wf^t'a#irr 1


-^ i fl™ .. ^
WI Bl

tefc^ ! nn T> i' T> ' i ^


Ifcfc,, ! ^l/T Ptillinni ^ TL *7
WI Western 1,2

— — —^- WI Port Washington 1523;4?5 I














nu





:::>::::::^


	 1^.. f \fi& Rrat-fn,« Prtinf 1 i


-------
B-3:           AND           OF       i           AND
State
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
OA
OA

Colbert
Colbert

Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
ECGaston
ECGaston
EC Canton
ECGaston
ECGKton
ECGastom
ECGastoa


Big Bead
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
BigBwrf
Crist
Crist
Crist
Crist
Sdwlz
Scholz
Arkwrifjil
Arfcwriglii
Affcwriglbt
AA.wright
Atfcwright



Etowea
ID
CSCO14 {1, 2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
$
CSOCAN(1,2)
1
3
CStCBN(3,4)
3
4
5
I
2
CS001(BB01,BB02)
BB01
BB02

BB03
BB04
4
5
6
7
1
2
CS001(1,2,3,4)
I
2
3
4
1BLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BLR
(a)

Table 1
1
Table 1
I
Tutilet

I
Table I

Table 1
Table I
1
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table 1

I
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table!
I
1
Table 1

37,56?




39,400
15,532


17,036


23,170
4,278
4,043
71,421


19,71!


3,849
3,071
9,678
18,352
2,087
2,561
3,134




32,61?
39,641
42,137
4«,25«

11,21 8,752
14,777,014
12,558,560
12.545.S4S
24,231,736

13,211,865
12,384,326

15,654,771
1 1,600,402
36,743,938
3,096,772
2,922,701

31,440,408
31,053,170

27,394,634
31,933,590
5,460,857
3,045,556
13,987,547
26,191,935
939.799
1,185,473

59X.922
502,753
731,829
528,757
40,189,922
48,181,454
52,104,185
57,205,135
SO2
31,939








19,812


33,819
4.S93
5,168
76,818


19J081


2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186





34,032
36,655
46,269
40,205

12.952.1S3
12,618,216
10,114,184
!3,§5S,2<69
34,058,704

15,064,260
16,306,916

14.032,114
14,192,836
48,089,378
3,518,404
3,649,976

31,111,381
31,794,449

28,490,272
35,141,092
3,215,872
3,291,052
16,798,233
17,764,345
1,099,257
1,316,280

815,186
754,577
920,206
850,114
44,244,090
47,089,666
• 61,120,578
52,430^13
SO2
Emissions
-14.«5%




4?.7fi%
41,82%


16,29%


45.96%
14.38%
27.83%
7.56%


-3.20%


-34.71%
-16.44%
37.47%
-19.07%
31.05%
24.40%
39.95%




434%
-7.53%
9.81%
-13.09%
jggS-j»6
Utittattimi
(nmBta)

15.45%
-14.61%
-19.46%
10.44%
40.55%

14.02%
31.67%

-1057%
22.35%
30.88%
13.62%
24.88%

4.05%
2.39%

4.00%
10.04%
-41.11%
8,06%
20J9%
-32.18%
16.97%
11.03%

36.11%
50.09%
25.74%
60.78%
10.09%
-2.27%
17.30%
-8.35%
                                         B-3. 1

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       I      19S5 AND 1996

GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA


Hammond
Hammond
BaUUBMOKl
Hammond
Hammond
Harllee Branch
Harliee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harliee Branch
Jade Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Kraft

Kraft
Krai
Meifitosh
Mitchell
Wanstey
Wansiey
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yales
Yates
Yates
Yales
Yates
Burlingjon
DesMoines
George Neal North

ID
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
4

1
2

3
4
CS001(MBt,MB2)
MB1
MB2
Ci001(l,2,3)
1
2
3
I
3
1
2
YIBR
(Y2BR,
Y2BR
Y3BR
(Y4BR, Y5BR)
Y4BE
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR
1
11
1

Unit («)

Tufclel
Table 1
TuSblel
TnHel

Substitution
Substitution

i«Minti<»i



T*!el

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Sutatltutioii
Sufastitution
Table 1
1
1

Table 1
1

I
1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
1

SO2
7,398



14,297
27,430


54,029


19.5S6


3,944



6,611
3,570
26,797
27,004
118
4,054


3.S79


6,535
5,683
9,020
9



4,615,977
2,407,951
2,687,402
18,893,171

13,369,411
16,458,59?

29,080,722
31,152,770

13,691,408
16,567,755

1,073,163
974,178
1,981,050
6,058,2«6
3,821,605
39,368,026
40,298,273
3,253,721

2,701,265
2,129,655

2,143,461
2,640,857
9,589,905
8,868,859
8,S18,»6
0
9,246,893

1996
SO2
liiissi0BS
7,246



143*4
26,616


39,409


18,544


4,65S



5,713
4,129
33,612
37,059
103
4,869


5,211


7,139
6,786
6,309
0
3.7S2

Utilization
--JssjMsL—,

3,515,633
2,751,274
3,572.759
19,191,000

14,3«0,3I3
14,456,249

19,090,017
25.2CT.00f

14,011,717
13,696390

1,626,008
1,220,370
2,376,381
6,698,41!
3,956,533
40,§44,610
44,775,798
2,858,072

3,418,865
3,189,297

3,775,583
3,086,657
11,140,080
10,667,714
9,611,935
0
9,453,477

SO2
Emissions
-2.05%



0.47%
-Z97%


-27,06%


-5.32%


IS, 10%



-13,58%
15.66%
25.43%
37.24%
-12.71%
20.10%


34.34%


9.24%
19.41%
-30.06%
0.00%
-0.79%

Utilization
{mmBtu}

-23.84%
14.26%
32.94%
1,51%

7.41%
-12.17%

-34.36%
-18.89%

2.34%
-17.33%

51.52%
25.27%
19.96%
10,57%
3.53%
3.75%
11.11%
•12.16%

26.57%
49.76%

76.14%
16.88%
16.16%
20.28%
8.99%
0.00%
2.23%


-------
             B-3:                AND                 OF          1               AND

IA
IA
IA
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL

L.



BaUwin
BalAwn
Coffeen
Coffeen
CoSem
Collins
CoUim
Collins
Collins
Collins
Collins
Coliins
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Havana
Havana
Itoraaa
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Hennepin
Hennepio
Hntsonville
Hutsonville
ID
2
4
5
1
1
3
CS0001(1,2)
1
2
€81230(1,2,3)
1
2
3
(4, 5)
4
5
1
I
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
1
2
5
6
TJJK (a)
Tahiel


I
Tahiel
1

I
1

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
1
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
?«450





31,228


375



2,708


1,043
1,017
6,950
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,215
27,560
4,455
3,355
11,498,280
8,711,126
4,381,65$
2S,3«»136
39,231,680
32,553,530

9,9IO,S49


12,406,868
9,562,665
S.382,516

4,067,958
3308,955
445,074
447,459
3,000,220
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,115,547
11,110,630
2,158,806
1,609,690
SO2
5,989
2,744
2,2S5
92,492
75,793
105,553
43,755


1,237



1,704


3,271
2,686
13,596
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
11,236,532
8,290,105
5,487,073
35,993,704
29,324,128
40,432,952

16,654,324
31,814,222

6,755310
6,510,067
9,007,079

6,090,653
3,233,683
1,402,802
1,190,947
5,945,488
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,514,131
15,675,990
4,959,359
3,814,018
SO2
Emissions
-19.6!%
-41.02%
25.09%
23,25%
-27.24%
21.62%
40.11%


229.87%



-37.0S%


213.61%
164.11%
95.63%
fl.00%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
e.oo%
0.00%
0.00%
-15.42%
44.56%
141.80%
154.22%
^nunBta}
-2.28%
-5.48%
25,23%


24.20%

68.04%
12.15%

-45.55%
-31.92%
7.45%

49.72%
-2.27%
215.18%
166.16%
98.17%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
-14.61%
41,09%
129.73%
136.94%
IL
        Joiet9
SBbstihiti«!
                                                                             3,274
13,664,473
                                            1,967
7,665,686
                                                                                                                               -39.92%
                                                                                                                                              -43.90%
                                                                          B-3, 3

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       i       1995 AND 1996

IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
EN
IN
IN
IN
EN

joppt Steam

Joppm Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa
Kincaid
KincaM
Kincaid
Merecfosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Newlwi
Newton
Vermilion
Vermilion
Vermilion
Wood River
Baitly
BaiUy
Baiily
Breed
Cayuga
Cayuga
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Creek
Cliiy
ID
€S1(I,2)
I
2
CS2(3,4)
3
4
CS3 (5, €)
5
6
(I, 2)
I
2
CS0001(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
2
CS3 (1, 2)
1
2
1
XS12 (7, 1}
7
g
1
1
2
CSOQ1(1,2,3)
1
2
3
(a)


TMilei


TaMel


T*lel

Table 1
Tablo 1

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
1
Substitution

1
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1

I
1
1
S€»2
8,090


7j692


12, 166


11,170


4,022




19,610
63
11,221
12,25t
2,623


0
6,246


0
44,666
46,504
47,634




14,S37,967
15,478,622

14,490,731
14,707,065

13,848,945
16,605,286

10,956,972
17,559,881

474,083
457,564
425,038
311,152
10,666,246
219,206
36,812,602
27,313,916

977,411
1,817,754
0

12,771,576
21,796,237
0
30,209,082
33,199,670

16,650,268
16,005,819
15,832,010
SO2
8,572


i,07I





20,051


6,672




15,943
112
11,148
15,404
579


0
3,835


0
38,676
32,134
50,661




14,960,182
I5,%9,238

15,215,573
13,102,754

15,574,434
14,937,071

20,133,483
21,671,782

1,044,625
708,893
664,115
903,356
11,667,552
373,709
27,174,200
32,173,480

358,330
743,988
0

12,840,429
18,413,238
0
31,117,238
24,405,552

16,465,964
15,821,604
16,401,939
SO2
Emissions
5,9fi%


4.93%


-2S.»5%


79,51%


65,89%




-18.70%
77.78%
-0.65%
25.66%
-77.93%


0.00%
-38.60%


0.00%
-13.41%
-30.90%
6.35%



J99SJ996_
UtilkatfoB
(mraBta)

0.82%
3.17%

5.00%
-10.91%

12.46%
-10.05%

83.75%
23.42%

120.35%
54.93%
56.25%
76.73%
9.39%
70.48%
-26.18%
17.79%

-63.34%
-59.07%
0.00%

0.54%
-15.52%
0.00%
3.01%
-26.49%

-1.11%
-1.15%
3,60%
                                          B-3, 4

-------
B-3:  El
AND            OF       I           MSO
State
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN

Cti%Cresk
Ciifty Creek


W
W Stoat
Elmer W Stout
FBCuUey
F B Culley
FBCulley
Frank E Rate
Frank E Rate
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
11 1 fritchard
H T
H T Pritchard
xMichigan Cily
Petersburg
Petersburg
R Gallagfier
R Gallagher
R Oaf lazier
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
Tanners Creek
Wabasli River
River
Ri¥«r
River
ID
C10§2(4,5,6)
4
5
6
50
60
TO
(2, 3)
2
3
ISGl
2SO1
(1, 2}
1
2
3
4
(5, 6)
5
6
12
1
2
(1,2)
I
2
(3, 4)
3
4
U4
1
(2, 3, 5, 6)
2
3
(a)




TaMel
1
1

Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table I

Table 1
1
Table I
Table 1

Substitution
Table I
1
Table 1
1

1
1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

TaMel
Table 1
SO2
43,870



5,282
6,151
27,424
2,549


10,038
10,604
99,980


60,912
3,783
5,932


12,261
21,305
41,336
25,393


26,23?


29,318
197
2S.211



15,290,483
14748,991
15,945,886
4,089,451
4,830,084
21,935,232

5,447,464
19,155,053
8,434,296
9,072,148

45,987,068
42,943,632
44,354,520
35,663,082

1,310,910
4,434,954
28,031,314
13,400,952
27,389.587

8,580,819
8,017,569

8,244,314
10,139,139
22,957,388
900,120

2,791,626
3,065,847

53,668



6,045
5,466
26,764
4,800


5,284
8,066
91,346


35,273
8,993
7,068


14,841
10,473
16,002
21,609


28,826


59,876
4,19?
38,986



16,332,747
1S.07S.609
16,547,688
5,588,803
4,806,792
24,589,32$

5,328,808
20,119,291
4,590,729
7,114,275

37,712,577
41,393,737
30,798,399
37,063,085

1,463,618
5,275,111
30,794,272
17,644,936
32.737.94S

6,645,958
8,185,232

1 1,064,458
9,937,363
30,441,214
5,111,474

4,532,020
4,199,125

SO2
Emissions
22,33%



14.45%
-11.14%
-2.41%
88.31%


-47.36%
-23.93%
-8.44%


-42.09%
137.72%
19.15%


21.04%
-50 «<*»
-6L31%
-14.90%


9,87%


104.23%
2030.46%
38.19%


Iftiliiaflan

6.82%
7.94%
3.77%
36.66%
•4.48%
12.10%

-2,18%
5.03%
-45.57%
-21.51%

-17.99%
-3.61%
-30.56%
3.93%

11.65%
18.94%
9.86%
31.67%
19.53%

-22.55%
2.09%

34.21%
-1.99%
32.60%
467.87%

62.34%
36.96%
                                            B-3, 5

-------
8-3:           AND           OF       1      1S95 AND 1996
State
IN
IN
IN
IN
M
IN
IN
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY


River
Watrick
Waniek
L»Cygne
Qutndaro
Coletman
Colsman
Coleaaij
Cooper
Cooper
E W Brawn
EW Brown
EW Brown
EW Brown
East Bend
Elmer Smilh
Elmer Smith
Etmer

Green B¥er
H L
Hmp&L 2
2
Paradise
EDOreen

m
5
6
XS 123 (1,2, 3)
3
1
2
4
1
2
Cl
C2
C3
CS1(1,2)
1
2
1
(2, 3)
2
3
2
XS12(1,2)
1
2
1
5
1
HI
H2
3

-------
B-3:

KY
KY
MA
MA
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MI
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN

RDGreea
Shawnee
Btaytoo Point
Mount Tom
CP Crane
CP Crane
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Morgsntown
Morgantown
R P Smith
RP Smith
DaaERarn
Dan E Kara
JCWeadock
JCWeadock
JCWeadock
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JR Whiting
JR Whiting
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
n>
G2
W
1
1
1
2
CSE12(I,2)
1
2
3
4
1
2
9
11
1
2
CS0009 (7, 8)
7
8
CSOQ09 (1, 2)
1
2
3
1
3
CSOQ01(3,4,5,6)
3
4
5
6
Unit (s)
Substitution
Table 1
Compensating
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table I
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution

Tabi« 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
SO2
1,689
2,953
11,739
8,223
6,138
6,024
41,087


3,010
1,354
28,040
38,515
118
1,536
7,272
11,137
11,789


13,171


27,198
4,244
4,807
3,040




14,243,216
10,752,771
17,047,825
9,923,946
10,403,533
9,920,042

17,440,446
20,961,601
6,119,037
10,668,616
27,858,112
37,190,575
170,583
2,125,734
12,444,982
18,168,756

10,947,084
9,862,172

16,333,282
4,809,230
52,821,444
6,684,072
7,936,734

1,203,949
2,203,745
4,590,541
7,723,726
SO2
2,314
2,3»
9,045
L7,314
15,581
13,163
37,211


2,67S
1,354
37,236
35,542
78
2,069
9,765
9,506
10,792


22,771


22,141
3,538
4,236
3,768




16,982,755
9,307,313
17^80,816
9,908,995
12,760,058
10,904,815

19,675,719
16,341,786
4,153,249
6,556,094
37,010,782
35,650,179
107,596
2,833,072
16,478,448
15,850,441

8,551,701
9,538,250

15,942,587
20,946,592
47,025,128
5,488,183
6,515,893

1,397,090
1,915,234
5,087,413
9,292,112
Percent
SO2
Emissions
37.00%
-18.76%
-22.95%
-11.05%
153,14%
118.51%
-9.43%


-11.03%
0.00%
32.80%
-7.72%
-33.90%
34.70%
34.28%
-14.64%
-8.46%


72.89%


-18.59%
-16.64%
-11.88%
23.95%




Utilization
(mmBta)
19.23%
-13.44%
1.95%
-0.15%
22.65%
9.93%

12.82%
-22.04%
-32.13%
-38.55%
32.85%
-4.14%
-36.92%
33.28%
32.41%
-12.76%

-21.88%
-3.28%

-2.39%
335.55%
-10.97%
-17.89%
-17.90%

16.04%
-13.09%
10.82%
20.31%
                                                       B-3, 7

-------
B-3:

MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO


County
CwnBy
County
Asbuiy
Hawthorn
River
James River
James liver
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Meramec
Mewniee
Meramec
M«amec
Montasse
Moalrose
Mootrose
Montrose
Mew Madrid
Mew Madrid
Rush Island
RIB A Island
Sibtey
Sibtey
Sibley
Sibley
Sioux
Sioux
Southwest
Thomas Hill

ID
€S!(!,2)
1
2
1
5
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
I
2
3
4
1
CS023(2,3)
2
3
I
2
1
2
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
1
2
1
MB1

(a)
Substitution
Ttbtel
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Sutetitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
1

SO2
9,463
8,112
5,634
744
966
2,054
23,321
23,236
38,025
44,223
1,852
1,209
4,702
5,161
2,31?
5,644
8,82?
7,926
21,412
22,209
12,214
27,477
20,379
2,144
2,817
B-3, 8
46,196,144
47,197,300
13,925,197

2 3 14,728
3,675,945
6,161,194
32,420,157
36,144,760
35,134,368
40,613,571
2,966,463
1,938,813
6,008,665
5.918,092
8,891,517
10,710,072
11,390,992
37,073,840
39,093,068
39,390,852
32,955,086
3,275,126
3,201,052
21,806,789
20,429,379
16,935,316
9,023,810
13,435,098






11,681
6,899
51,536
36,790
3,344
3.522
5,682
4,678
2.S77
5,431
8,855
8,007
13,225
14,044
17,893
22,358
34,038
3,066
2,934

5i,3i9,9S2
51,477,248
11,502^68
26,458,409
2,206,094
3,885,157
7,562,737
37,988,343
20,875,392
42,373,060
31,934,417
3,684,584
4,040,199
6,226,032
5,282,678
11,154,264
10,700,341
9,451,260
37,130,588
38,456,072
37,060,«98
39,943,130
3,323,704
3,278,399
25,052,823
16,705,724
26,575,398
1 1,742,780
13,624,236

SOI
Emissions


4t,24%
216,94%
404.55%
314,46%
-49.91%
-70,31%
. 35.53%
-16.81%
80.56%
191,32%
20.84%
-9.36%
24.17%
-3.77%
0.32%
1.02%
-3S.24%
-36,76%
46.50%
-18.63%
67.02%
43.00%
4.15%

1995-1996
UtiMatian
(•nBtn)
11.24%
9.07%
-17,40%
15.71%
-4.69%
5.69%
22.75%
17.18%
-42.25%
20.60%
-21.37%
24.21%
108.39%
3.62%
-10.74%
25.45%
-17.03%
0.15%
-1.63%
-5.92%
21.20%
1.48%
2.42%
14.89%
-18.23%
56.92%
30.13%
1.41%


-------
B-3:

MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NH
NH
NH
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY

Thomas Hill
Hill
Jack Watson
Jack Watson
RD Morrow
R D Morrow
Victor J Daniel Jr
Menrimack
Menimack
Newingten
BL England
BL England
Dunkifk
Dunkirk
Dunkirk
GreenMge
Mitliken
Miiliken
Mitliken
Norfhport
Northport
Norfhporf
Oswego
Oswego
Oswego
Port Jefferson
Port JeffeisoB
Roseton
Rosetoa
ID
MB2
MB3
4
5
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
CS0003(3»4)
3
4
6
I
1
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
3
4
1
2
SO2
Type («)
1
Substitution
1
i
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Table I
1
1
1
Table 1
Table I
1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
3,749
10,404
18,577
38,044
2,914
3,618
10,168
10,450
25,678
11,155
18,101
3,619
34,621
9,824
9,376
4,114
2,228
4,047
538
0
0
837
3,640
2,636
1,607
2,381
17,244,380
49,236,656
11,344,947
23,456,288
9,255,066
10,149,701
28,195,408
8,230,447
22,133,654
16,127,739
8,141,332
10.819,425
10,143,622
12,425,425
7,184,237
12,731,349
10.409,978
7,303,890
17,624,404
7,703,107
23,759,787
0
0
4,261,424
6,598,425
4,722,844
7,175,269
10,692,101
12
SO2
Emissions
4,685
9,798
19,627
43,588
4,847
3,749
9,476
10,606
24,037
9,291
18,368
1,752
31,867
7,144
4,471
3,414
4,«4»
1^14
0
0
772
2.S35
4,499
2,903
4,021
m.
(mmBtu)
22,154,212
45,296,444
14,560,545
32,937,887
15,620,857
12,152,295
26,055,044
7,621,232
19,712,188
11,114,684
9,042^02
11,703,690
10,792,923
10,116,478
5,512,986
10,937,583
11,668,817
11,054,751
17,346,236
8,524,632
16,800,166
0
0
3,242,998
5,475,689
8,003,758
6,148,402
7,670,038
S€>2
EmusioDS
24.97%
-5.82%
5.65%
14.57%
66.33%
3.62%
-6.81%
1.49%
-6.39%
-16.71%
2.58%
-51.59%
-7.95%
-27.28%
-32.31%
47.30%
56.37%
14.88%
157.25%
0.00%
0.00%
-7.77%
-22.12%
70.68%
80.65%
68.8S%
UtiitatioB
J(inmBta)
28.47%
-8.00%
28.34%
40.42%
68.71%
19,73%
-7.59%
-7.40%
•10.94%
-31.08%
11.07%
8.17%
6.40%
-18Jt%
-23,26%
-13.93%
12.09%
51.35%
-1.58%
10.66%
-29.29%
0.00%
0.00%
-23.90%
-17.02%
69.47%
-14.31%
-28.26%
                                                        B-3, 9

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       i           AND
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH

Acme
Acme
Aone
Acme
Acme
Acme
Ashtabula
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Cardinal
Cardinal
Conesville
Conesville
Conesville
Conesvilie
Conesvilie
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Edgewater
Edgewater
Edgewater
Gen J M Gavin
Gen J M Gavin
Gorge
Gorge
n»
13
14
15
16
91
92
7
9
10
11
n
CSS {1,2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
1
1
CS012(1,2)
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
11
12
13
1
2
25
26
SO2
Unit Type (•)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,183
2,594
3,309
0
21,921
25,051




83,160
22,146
19,753


8,125
62,940
8,635
13,025
14,451
23,405
57,855
0
0
10
11,945
11,533
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,511,963
2,236,810
4,989,579
0
32,497,742

7,651,417
7,419,431
7,676,340
9,735,000
33,575,480
39,902,156

3,180,516
6,148,562
4,371,286
29,868,708
4,959,011
7,087,542
8,096,208
12,634,666
26,915,088
0
0
1,649,050
86,515,632
68,002,336
0
0
1996
SO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863
25,025




76,138
28,212
25,264


12,794
58,778
13,095
13,779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4
28,370
40,672
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,131,030
1,685,434
5,121,816
0
34,561,596

7,693,884
6,622,437
7,582,696
10,498,676
29,017,768
26,408,584

5,267,264
5,867,919
5,872,821
27,390,004
6,729,324
7,530,250
5,833,256
11,184,656
31,917,980
0
0
169,446
85,368,952
100,099,832
0
0
Ckanj
S02
Emissions
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
130.49%
-52.54%
10.85%
0.00%
27.11%
•4.10%




-8.44%
27.39%
27.90%


57.46%
-6.61%
51.65%
5.79%
-26.66%
-3.70%
4.95%
0.00%
0.00%
-60.00%
137.51%
252.66%
0.00%
0.00%
ee.
Utilization
___£nimBtii)
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
120.09%
-24.65%
2.65%
0.00%
6.35%

0.56%
-10.74%
-1.22%
7.84%
-13.57%
-33.82%

65.61%
-4.56%
34.35%
•8.30%
35.70%
6.25%
-27.95%
-11.48%
18.59%
0.00%
0.00%
-89.72%
-1.33%
47.20%
0.00%
0.00%
                                          B-3, 10

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       1           AND
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH

JMStaarf
JMSteart
JMStuart
JMStoart
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Like Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Muskinguni River
Muskitigum River
Muskingum River
Muskinguni River
Muskingum River
Muskingum River
Niles
Miles
Picway
Postal
Poston
Poston
R E Burger
RE Burger
REBiirger
R E Burger
ID
I
2
3
4
€8001(1,2,3,4,5)
I
2
3
4
5
18
91
92
93
94
CSQ56(S-l,5-2,6)
5-1
5-2
6
7
€8014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
9
1
2
3
CS0001 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
I
2
3
Unit (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
12
SO2
Emissions
22,861
31,903
25,034
27,841
92,806





0
0
0
0
0
4,193



21,301
102,908




14,648
13,080
12,340
4,722
0
0
0
41,658



25
Utilization
(mmBtu)
32,762,470
44,629,995
34,990,744
38,786,248

13,812,450
15,%2,478
16,634,018
IS,557,%2
16,166,596
0
0
0
0
0

196,579
196,579
4,580,562
28,213,054

5,416,381
7,060,761
7,503,635
8,997,649
27,541,864
6,798,223
5,531,406
1,792,457
0
0
0

308,726
263,393
226,002
12
SO2
Emissions
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226
123,599





1,433
0
0
0
0
14,421



38,985
160,368




20,223
7,110
15,375
15,071
0
0
0
62,557



96
Utilization
_[minBtu)_
32,856,554
39,776,416
36,913,980
31,602,492

15,541,682
15,701,555
15,148,702
14,375,389
16,381,780
2,396,829
0
0
0
0

516,801
516,801
12,392,706
38,049,581

9,743,860
10,890,512
11,872,478
11,380,074
36,993,688
7,986,488
5,619,661
5,014,683
0
0
0

0
0
0
SO2
Emissions
0,21%
42.06%
3.69%
-20.17%
33.18%





NA
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
243.93%



83.02%
55.84%




38.06%
-45.64%
24.59%
219.17%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
50.17%



Utilization
(mmBtu)
0.29%
-10.88%
5.50%
-18.52%

-1.71%
•1.63%
-8.93%
-7.60%
1.33%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

162.90%
162.90%
170.55%
34.87%

79.90%
54.24%
58.22%
26.48%
34.32%
17.48%
1.60%
179.77%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

-100.00%
-100.00%
-100.00%
                                          B-3, 11

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       1       1995 AND 1996
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
FA
PA
FA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
FA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA

RE Burger
R E Burger
RE Burger
R E
RE Burger
Toroirto
Toronto
Toronto
WHSanunis
WHSammis
W H Sammis
Walter C Beekjord
Waiter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brenner Island
Brunner Island
Btunaer Hand
Brutmer Island
Cheswick
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Fenry
HstfieW s Ferry
HatfiekTs Ferry
Haifiehfs Ferry
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
ID
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
H
5
6
7
5
6
1
2
I
1
CS102(1,2)
1
2
3
1
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
CS 102 (1,2)
1
2
3
4
(a)
Substitution
Table!
1
Table 1
1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

1
Table I
1
1
1
1

Table 1
Table!
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution






0
0
0
12,62?
27,041
22,162
8,34?
17,479
4,711
17,196
7,388
5,532
41,061


56,335
42,900
4,729
73364
164,841



10,762


3,045
3,435
92,323
491,027
491,368
6,031,625
10,268,509
0
0
0
20,924,484
44,119,407
33,827,070
9,616,651
21,792,036
3,503,406
13,270,697
47,151,736
34,343,992

18,577,384
17,525,951
49,753,884
35,130,348
72,404,491
52,129,065

39,196,629
28,031,200
29,440,740

5,495,084
4,380,845
6,673,213
7,686,067
SO2





0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
22,761
40,041
16,496
15,654
5,831
8,159
47,771


44,832
39,980
3376
3,732
153,413



24,601


2,442
3,016
0
342,333
345,590
12,351,365
1«,05S,S14
0
i
0
17,229,437
40,507,621
39,173,092
15,965,398
27,366,092
11,760,419
10,843,803
39,049,744
51,758,064

19,038,246
21,075,806
39,299,942
32,374,384
56,341,839
60,156,610

32,091,132
33,885,414
27,107,067

10,422,634
7,831,516
5,348,032
8,813,199
SO2
Emissions





0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
-3.01%
12.58%
26.19%
172.68%
129.08%
250.16%
-8.97%
-21.07%
47,49%
16.34%


-20.42%
-6.81%
-28.61%
-94.91%
-6.93%



128.59%


-19.80%
-12.71%
Utiliatioii
(mmBta)
-100.00%
-».2S%
-29,67%
104,89%
'1.03%



-17,66%
4,19%
15.80%
66,02%
25.58%
235.69%
-18.29%
-17.18%
50.70%

2.48%
20.25%
-21.01%
-7.84%
-22.18%
15.40%

-18.13%
20.88%
-7.93%

89.67%
78.77%
-19.86%
14.66%
                                          B-3, 12

-------
B-3:           AND           OF       1       199S AND 1996
State
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN

Mitchell
Newcastle
Newcastle
Portland
Portland
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Sunbury
Sunbury
Allen
Allen
Allen
Cumberland
Cumberland
DuPont JohnsonvilSe
DaPont Johnsonville
DuPont Johnsonville
DuPont JohnsonviHe
Gallatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
GaMatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
JohnsonviHe
JohnsonviHe
Johnsonville
m
33
1
2
1
2
1
2
CS1(3,4)
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
JVD1
JVD2
JVD3
JVD4
CSGA12 (1, 2)
1
2
CSGA34(3,4)
3
4
CSJO10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Unit Type (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution.
Tablet
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Opt-In
Opt-In
Opt-In
Opt-In

Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
S02
835
0
0
11,088
11,055
14,265
10,837
33,302


9,847
9,511
13,144
16,512
18,618
12,445
13,685
0
0
0
0
47,243


51,122


114,677







13,990,360
0
0
7,308,370
7,470,403
9,567,429
6,931,655

12,104,776
11,393,059
8,181,105
8,087,213
14,735,570
15,702,330
15,721,586
125,433,200
120,376,016





15,506,107
14,797,124

16,469,892
14,950,402

6,322,332
6,033,143
5,555,598
6,407,192
7,955,222
6,882,233
10,264,280
19
SO2
Emissions
728
0
0
11,963
13,820
10,587
13,474
29,884


9,511
10,939
5,434
6,503
8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0
55,363


61,303


126,367







96
Utilization
(mmBta)
9,346,753
0
0
8,004,960
9,654,232
7,071,835
8,841,290

12,231,908
9,337,793
7,316,803
8,495,968
13,232,597
15,751,898
13,330,030
88,223,6%
121,294,176
0
0
0
0

14,169,010
15,977,846

15,888,894
18,810,130

8,771,161
8,608,948
9,183,864
8,805,822
5,801,129
8,424,067
10,200,693
1995-19% .
SO2
	
-12.81%
0.00%
0.00%
7.89%
25.01%
-25.78%
24.33%
-10.26%


-3.41%
15.01%
-58.66%
-60.62%
-54.91%
-23.47%
-3.16%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
17.19%


19.92%


10.19%







-33.19%
0.00%
0.00%
9.53%
29.23%
-26.08%
27.55%

1.05%
-18.04%
-10.56%
5.05%
-10.20%
0.32%
-15.21%
-29.66%
0.76%
NA
NA
NA
NA

-8.62%
7.98%

-3.53%
25.82%

38.73%
42.69%
65.31%
37.44%
-27.08%
22.40%
-0.62%
                                          B-3, 13

-------
B-3:
State
TN
TO
TO
W!
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W!
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W!
WI
WI
Plant
JotasonvilJe
Jotasoovffle
Jotasottville
Alma
Ataw
Alna



JFMadgett
Nelson Devey
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
North Oak Cwek
North Oak Creek
North Oak Creek
North Oak Creek
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pulliam
Pulliam
PulHam
PuUbun
Puliiam
Rock River
Rock River
Scyth O*k Creek
South Oak Creek
Oitk Creek
ID
S
9
10
CSI (84, B5)
m
BS
3
4
1
Bl
CSI (1,2)
1
2
1
2
3
4
CS7(1,2.3)
1
2
3
4
5
€856(5,6)
5
6
7
8
1
2

5
6
UBitTfpe(t)

Table 1
Table 1

Substitution
Substitution
SvMtutMn
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution

Table 1


T»Mel
Table 1
Table!

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution

lubjtituti
-------
            B-3:               AND                OF          I         1995 AND 1996
State
W!
WI
Wl
WI
WI
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
WY
WY
WY



South Oak Creek
Western
Weston
Albright
Albright
Albright
Fort
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Kammer
KanuHer
Kammer
Kammer
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Mt
Mt Storm
Rives vilie
Rivesvilie
Willow
Jim Bridgsr
Jim Bridger
Jim
ID

7
8
I "
2
1
2
3
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
CS013(I,2,3)
1
2
3
CS012(t,2)
1
2
CSO(1,2)
1
2
3
7
8
2
BW71
BW72
JBW73
Unit (a)

TaMei
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Sobsttation
Substitution
I
Table 1
1

1
I
1

1
I
TaWel

Table I
Table I

1
1
T«btel
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
1221
SO2
15,663


969
1,936
2,386
2,358
11,444
26,803
43,171
9,944



122,193



61,623


95,244


2,549
418
1,357
7,908
7,919
6,760
7,794

20,300,114
12,620,790
3,302,695
6,891,829
1.931J26
1,915,246
8,920,319
21,629,768
33,891,670

46,581,148
47,280,205
45.540,215

12.853.671
14,982,618
15.522,353

35,522,720
47,106,040

36.081,280
39,353,660
38,955,084
620,003
1,686,555
7,872,392
53,237,281
44,157,743
51,064,868
SOI
20,718


1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
37,468
16,469



1



53,152


107,211


5,096
233
1,037
6,739
6,272
7,165
6,180

18,264,6S6
18,247,312
3,536,812
6,367,751
1,190,327
1,675,656
7,663,974
26,435,504
29,454,119

50,422,229
49,485,012
46,729,368

15,233,808
12,862,993
14,005,666

47,955,776
34,334,844

40,588,560
43397,872
28,675,658
287,932
1,232,614
7,224,854
41,591,229
47,105,263
40,956,546

SO2
Emissions
32.27%


14.14%
4.39%
-39.27%
-16.79%
-19.21%
25.67%
-13.21%
65.62%



-2.31%



43.75%


12.56%


99.92%
-52.25%
-23.58%
-14.78%
-20.80%
5.99%
-20.71%
UtiifeatfeM
(mnBtu)

-10.03%
44,59%

-4.70%
-38.38%
-12.51%
-14.08%
22.22%
-13.09%

8.25%
4,«%
Mt%

18.52%
-14.15%
-9.77%

35.00%
-27.11%

12.49%
10.28%
-26.39%
-53.56%
-26.92%
-8.23%
-21.88%
6.67%
-19.10%
WY
         (a)         Ifce        unit as      in
      Substitution
                        S.2S1
34,062,900
10,012
40,346,052
                        20.90%
1, or as a            or

                    B-3, 15
                                                                                      !8.4S%

-------
B-4:            AND                      OF       1

AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
At
AL
AL
AL
AL
PL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
QA
GA
QA
Plant Name
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
ECGaston
ECGnston
ECGaston
ECOastan
E C Getan
ECGaston
E CGsiton
Gadsden
Gadsden
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Crist
Cnsl
Crist
Crist
Scholz
Scholz
Arkwright
Arkwight
Arfcwnght
Arkwright
Arkwright
BOWCE*
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Harflee Branch
Harllee Blanch
Harflee Branch
ID
CSC014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
CSOCAH(1,2)
1
2
CSOCBN(3,4)
3
4
5
1
2
CS001(BBO),BB02)
BB01
BB02
XS23 (BB03,
BB03
BB04
4
5
6
7
I
2
(1, 1, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
IBLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BIR
CS001 (1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
4
CSOOi(],2)
1
2
limit Type (a)

Table 1
Tablet
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

1
Table 1

fable 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

Tibiel
Table 1

Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table I
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Tablet
Table 1

Substitution
Substitution
SOI
Einlsifctiis
37,507




39,400
15,532


17,036


23,170
4,278
4,043
71,421


19,711


3,849
3,071
9.678
18,352
2,0X7
2,561
3,134




32,617
39,641
42,137
46,258
7,398



14,297
27,430


mm
31,939




5S.21S
22,028


19,812


33,819
4,893
5,168
76,818


19,081


2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186
4,386




34,032
36.655
46,269
40,205
7,246



14,364
26.616


Aflommccs
(c)

13,213
14,907
14,995
15,005
45,923

17,624
11,052

17,828
18,773
58,265
5,158
5,374

27,662
26,387

26,036
6.400
9,953
9,374
18,695
50,703
8,282
8,572

Z437
2,240
3,944
3,159
54,838
53.329
69,862
69,852

8,549
8,977
8,676
36,650

19,221
21,735
HeUin

18,192
18,968
20,772
20,801
70,408

13,231
14,519

1 1,871
16,295
39,761
6,038
6,705

41,114
41,063

14,986
8,85S
16.057
15,677
27,712
51,395
14,477
14,583

4.090
3,697
7,105
5,334
48.838
48,795
63.866
59,725

14,632
15,488
14,886
51,003

24,727
31,755
A10w«icea
for
(i)

8,390
8,221
6,371
8,957
58,218

10,578
11,450

9,850
9,962
33,819
4,893
5,168

38,409
38,409

14,311
4,770
2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186

1,096
1,097
1,096
1,097
34,032
36,655
46,269
40,205

2,415
2,415
2,416
14.364

13,308
13,308
I
(e)

0
0
0
0
0

0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
ABomnces
Over
to 1ff7

9,802
10,747
14,401
11,144
12,190

2,653
3,139

2,021
6,333
5,942
1,145
1,537

2,705
2,654

675
4,088
13,544
13,111
14,408
36,542
11,742
11,397

2,994
2,600
6,009
4,437
14,806
12,140
17,597
19,520

12,217
13,073
12,470
36,639

11,419
11,447
                                                    B-4,1

-------
B-4:            AND                      OF       1

GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
OA
GA
OA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
1L
tt.
tt.
IL
n.
TL
tt,
IL
IL
PbntNane
Harllee Bfaneb.

Harllee Branck
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Medonough
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Meintosh
Mitchell
Wansley
Wansley
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yaws
Yates
Yates
Yates
Burlington
Des Moines
George Heal North
Milton L Kapp
Prairie Creek
Riverside
Baldwin
Baldwin
Baldwin
Cofifeen
Coffeen
Coffeen
Collins
Collins
Collins

(3, 4)
3
4
CS001
MB1
MB2
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
1
3
1
2
Y1BR

Y2BE
Y3BE
CS002(Y4BE,YSBR)
Y
-------
B-4:            AND                      OF       I
State
IL
IL
IL
IL
n.
JL
JL
IL
TL
JL
JL
JL
TL
IL
IL
TL
tt.
E.
H,
E,
IL
E,
E.
E,
tt.
E,
IL
tt,
IL
tt.
E.
tt.
n.
n.
!
TL
IL
IL
IL
JL
TL
JL
IL
Plant Name
Collins
Collins
Collins
Collins
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Hennepin
Hennepin
Hutsonville
Hiitsonville
Joliet 9
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Kincaid
Kincaid
Kincaid
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosis
Meredosis
Meredosis
Meredosia
Newton
Newton
Vermilion
Vermilion
ID
3
CS(M05(4,5)
4
5
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
5
6
$
CS1 (1, 2)
1
2
CS2(3,4)
3
4
CS3 (5, 6)
5
6
CS0102(1,2)
1
2
CS0001 (1, 2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
CS3 (1, 2)
1
Unit Type (a)
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Table I
Table I

Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
EnntaiMn
1995 (ft)

2,708


1,043
1,01?
6,950
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,215
27,560
4,455
3,355
3,274
8.090


7,692


12,166


11,170


4,022




19,610
63
11,221
12,258
2,623

ma
Enilssfcms

1,704


3,271
2,686
13,5%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
1,967
8,572


8,071


8,644


20,051


6,672




15,943
112
11,148
15,404
579

Allwwuiees
(c)
1,»S6

1,555
1,722
1,068
1,015
6,479
34
43
34
34
34
34
34
34
10,012
20,182
9,661
9,837
5,595

12,259
10,487

11,947
11,061

11,119
10,341

34,564
37,063

1,245
1,355
1,173
1,078
15,227
44
14,599
6,346

12,972
Held fat
Uittt
as of 1/30/97
3,636

1,555
1,722
3,393
2,863
14,289
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,774
41,099
10,867
8,719
5,595

20,473
16,929

20,048
18,276

16,155
14,599

62,043
68,541

2,155
1,731
1,407
1,887
16,044
175
11,477
15,853

317
Deducted for
(<§
412

152
852
3,27!
2,686
13,596
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
1,967

4,286
4,286

4,035
4,036

4,322
4,322

10,025
10,026

2,090
1,426
1,334
1,822
15,943
112
11,148
15,404

160
Deducted Under
I
(e)
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0

3,224

703
S70
122
177
693
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
980
1,257
95
190
3,628

16,187
12,643

16,013
14,240

1 1,833
10,277

52,018
58,515

65
305
73
65
101
63
329
449

157
                                                    B-4, 3

-------
B-4:                    AND                                     OF            !



IL
H,
IN
W
IN
M
IN
W
W
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
K
IN
IN
IN
IN



VMfe.
WoodRi¥«
Baity


Breed
Cayugi
Cayuga
Clifiy Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Elmer W Stout
EtaerW Stout
Elmer W Stout
F B Culley
FBCuIley
FBCulley
Frank ERatts
Frank ERatts
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
HTPtitefaard
HTPritetord
H T Pritchatd


StaeitfUfiaiD
2
1

7
8
1
1
2
CS001(1,2, 3)
1
2
3
(4, 5, 6)
4
5
6
50
60
70
(2, 3)
2
3
1SG1
2SG1
CS0003(1.2)
1
2
3
4
CS596 (5, 6)
5
6


(8)
W*l





Table 1
fable 1

Table!
Tablet
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table i
Table 1

Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1

Substitution
Tablet
SO2
Emissions
—JMSjSL.

0
6,246


0
44,666
46,504
47,«34



43,870



5,282
fi,151
27,424
2,549


10,038
10,604
99,980


60,912
3,783
5,932


SO2
Ewiissfeiis


0
3,135


0
38,676
32,134
50.661



53,668



6,045
5,466
26,764



5,214
8,066
91,546


35,273
8,993
7,068


1996
Allowances


§

30,088
39,951
20,280
47,134
37,415

19,620
19,289
19,873

19,552
18,851
19.844
4.253
5,229
25,883

4,703
18,603
9,131
9.2%

44.288
44,956
45,033
56,010

1,458
6,325


as of
573
0

1SJ33
37,0»
35.0S7
56,070
50,1»

23,191
21,135
21,816

11,236
2X564
23,557
6,249
5,651
26,819

6,857
5,661
10,774
9,478

59,319
60,447
59,257
65,038

1,557
5,734

fer
(i)
419
0

1,576

0

32,134

16.887
16,887
16,887

17,890
17,889
17,889
6,045
5,466
26,764

4,800
0
5,284
i.066

43,419
41,127
35,273
8,993

1,449
5,619

Special i»»l
(e)
0
0

ft
9
0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
823
0

0
0
0
0

0
0



154
0

16,757
34,761
35.0S7
17,394
18,061

6,311
4,248
4,929

5,346
4,675
5,668
204
185
55

2,057
5,661
4,667
1,412

15,900
1X320
23,984
56,045

108
115
IN

IN
IN

IN
W
IN
IN
IN
Michigan City

Petersburg
Petersburg

R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
RGmlbgtar
12

1
2

CS0001 (1, 2)
1
2
CS0002 (3, 4)
3
                                                     Table I
                                                     Table 1
                                                     Table 1
                                                     Table 1
                                                     Table 1
                                                     Table 1
12,261

21,305
41,356

25,393
                                                                          26,237
14,841

10,473
16,002

21,609
                                                                                         28,826
48,963

18,011
35,496
                               13,908
                               12.644
                                                                                                         13,127
70,782

10,878
16,524
                                   16,689
                                   15,557

                                   18,656
14,841

10,473
16.002
                                       9,367
                                       12,242

                                       15,120
55,941

 405
 522
                                                            7,322
                                                            3,315

                                                            3,536
                                                                                        B-4, 4

-------
B-4:            AMD                      OF       i

w
IN
K
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
W
»
W
W
KS
KS
KY
KY
K¥
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KT
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY

R Gallagher
Tamers Creek

Ri»er
Wsbash River
River
Wtbash River
Wabash River
Wanttdk




LaCygne
Qaifrftro



Cooper
Cooper
Cooper
EWBmm
IWBRwrn
BW Blown
EWBrown

Etaw Smith
Elmer Smith
Etacr Smith

Onsen River
BLSprfock
HmpSL Station 2
Btnp&L Station 2
hmte
EPStwa
RBOteen
Stack/Unit ID
4
U4
1

2
3
5
6
(1, X 3}
3
I
2
4
1
2
CI
C2
C3
CSI (1. 2)
1
2
1
CS»3(2,3)
2
3
2
XS12(1.2)
1
2
1
S
1
HI
H2
3
61
G2
Unit type (a)
Table I
fiblel


I
1
Table I
Table 1

Opt-In


I
Substitution
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table I

Table 1
Tibtol
Substitution

Table I
Table 1
Table I
fiblel
Table 1
Table I
TsMel
fable I
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Emiasiuiss


197





0



37,682
3,872
2,893
15,759
18,500
18.013
18,389


4,259
23,4*


11,378
7.SS5


S.3I1
1§,448
15,297
10,616
10,fil6
155,612
1.5SO
I,6i9
SO2
EaiissliiBS












55,629
6,372
1,715
17,749
19,919
I9.4SS
16,652


5.500
33,012


1
6,280


7,414

13,334
2,315
3,578

1,085
2,314
1996
Allowances
(e)
12,512
27,209
5,558

5,874
4,111
4.838
17,362

13,777
15,272
15,895
29,577
23,489
4,109
20,912
19,363
16,205

7,254
14,917
6,923

12.121
35,334
17,447

6,341
14,031
63,448
15,597
22.181
19,533
19,180
135,688
5,«l
6.073
Held IB
17,003
142,139
6,851

7,956
10,048
6,624
27,709

14,377
14.378
15,295
58.410
8,811
5,325
19,842
22,250
21,778

8,440
17.513
19,939

31,653
77,152
21,385

2.743








10,457
for I
(d) (*)
!3,70S
59,876
4.1S7

5,891
5,425
5^!43
22,425

14,114
13,21i
9,828
55,629
6,372
1,715
17,7*9
19,919
»,4ft

5,495
11,157
5,500

9,376
23,636
11,021

1,114
4,3%
7.4S4
I0,l«2
13,334
2,315
3,578
146,2fl
1.0S5
2,314
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
4,406
0
0
1.0S2
0
§
0

0
0
0

§
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
to It??
3,297
S2,2«3
2,654

2.0S
4,623
1,379
5,214

193
1,100
1,061
2,7*1
2,439
2,528
2,093
X33I
2,290

2,945
6,356
14,439

22,277
53,516
10,362

859
2,006
S1.9J7
16,444
17,393
6,331
4,707
38,709
7,417
8.143
                                                    B-4, 5

-------
B-4:            AND                      OF        I
State
KY
MA
MA
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO

Shawnee

Mount Tom
CP Crane
CP Crane
Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Morgifitown
Morgantown
RP Smith
R P Smith
DaiEKam
DanEKam
J C Weadock
J C Weadock
J C Weadock
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
J H Casipbell
JR Whiting
J R Whiting
High Bridge
Bridge
High Bridge
High
High Bridge
Sheibame County
Sherbume County
Sheibume County
-Asbury
Hawthorn
James River
River
River
IB
10
1
«
i
2
CSE120.2)
J
2
3
4
1
9
11
1
2
(7, 8)
7
8
CSOOQ9
-------
B-4:            AND                      OF       1
State
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NH
NH
NH
NJ
MI
NY
NY



Montose
Mosteose
New Madrid
Rush Wand
KushMiwi
Siblej?
Sibfcy
Sioux
Sioux
Soudmmt
TtenasHill
ThonasBill
ThowHitl
fckWateos
Jack
SD Morrow
RBMouow
Victor I DniielJr
-Mffiimwcic
l«ffilfllllS6lC

BlEngtand
Dunkik
Dunkiik
StadrtMtlD
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
CS023(2,J)
2
3
1
2
1
2
CS«»tfl,2,3)
1
2
3
J
2
1
MB1
4
5
1
2
2
1
2
I
1
2
CS0003P.4)
3
IMtf
fable 1
Tabfe!
T*l« i
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Title 1
Table 1
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

T*l«l
Table 1
Substitution
Tsblel
Table!
Table 1
SO2
lairiMaiM
1995 (k)
23,321
23,236
38,025
44,223
1,852
5,161
2,317
5,644
8.S27
7,926
21,412
22,209
12,214
27,477
20,379
2,144
2,817
3,7®
10,404
W.577
38,044
2,914
3,618
10.16S
10,450
2S,67t
11,155
18,101
3JS19
34,621
SO2
UjStl
6,899
51,536
36,790
3344
3,522
5,482
4,678
2,877
5,431
8,855
8,007
13,225
14,044
17,193
22.358
34,038
3,066
2,934
4,«85
9,791
19,627
43,588
4,847
3,749
9,476
10,606
24,037
9,291
18,568
1,752
31,867

39,055
36,718
39,249
34,994
1,816
1,948
4,166
4,507
7,196
7,984
9,824
27.497
31,625
26,935
30,146
2,782
3,332
15,170
21,976
23,067
3,922
9,980
18.SSO
14,011
17,439
35,734
4,571
5,002
9,851
9,922
21,421
20,127
14,365
18,357
12,268
BeUtia
IMtAccMMb
12,789
38,481
56,723
40,465
3,730
3,817
6,230
5,153
3,021
3,022
2,681
46,167
32,624
32,458
3S,«3
4,127
5,206
21,179
24,652
37,455
5,700
13,143
12,011
17,618
22,075
47,015
5,626
5,936
11,889
11,072
24,464
29,099
24,151
3,505
30,791

11,681
6,899
51,536
36,790
3,344
3,522
5,682
4,678
2.877
2.S7J
2,553
8,855
8,007
13,225
J4.044
1,789
5,789
14,315
22,}5i
34,031
3,066
2,934
4,685
9.798
!9,627
43^18
4,847
3,749
9,47
-------
B-4:          AMD                    OF       I

NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
MY
MY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
CM
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
CM



Oweaidp!
MUiiken
Milliken

Northpart
Northport




Osw^go
Fort Jefferson
Port its/earn
Roaton
Rosetesn
Acme
Acme
Acme
Aci»e
Acme
Acme
Ashtabula
Aron Lake
AronLake
Avon Lake
AFOfiLake
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Cardinal
Cardinal
ConesviJJe
Conesville
ComsvilJe
Conesvjlle
Conesville
Eastlake


4
6
XS12(1,2)
1
2
]
2
3
4
4
5
6
3
4
1
2
13
14
IS
16
91
92
7
9
10
11
12
CSS (1,2, 3, 4)
1
"i
3
4
1
2
CS012(1,2)
1
2
3
4
I

Unit Type (a)
Table 1
Table 1

Table!
Table 1
Table 1
I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table ]

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table !
Table!
Table!

SO2
EmfariMS


9,316


4,114
2,22!
4,047
538
0
0
837
3,640
2,636
1,607
2,381
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,183
2,594
3,309
0
21,921
25.051




S3, 160
22,146
19,753


8,125
62,940
8,635

SO2
Emissions

7,144
4,471


4060
3,484

1,384
0
0
772
2,835
4,499
^903
4,02!
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863
25,025




76,138
28,212
25,264


12.794
58,778
13,095
B-4, 8
159*
jUtaMMHICtS
13,690
7,342

10,116
12,083
19,219
23.4T6
25,713
5,516
371
12,365
4,499
10,194
12,006
19,147
16,872
9
13
1?
1,930
740
662
18,351
8.763
7,879
12,771
33,413

7,414
6,957
7,58$
12.4*1
84,106
42,008

8,924
5,360
12,593
53,463
8,551

Ifcliini



14,743
12,411

9,651


750
17,263
7.342
5,743
9,360
19,147
16,872
0
0
0
0
0
0
45,954
1,718
4,218
0
31,405

6,414
5,957
6,585
11,481
79,945
63,387

18,939
13,909
18,331
76,313
14,467


15,411
7,144

2.34S
2,13
6,060
3.4S4
4,«4f
1JS4
0
0
772
2,835
4,4»
2,903
4,021
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863

5,005
5,005
6,006
9,009
76,138
28,212

12,017
13,247
12,794
58,778
13,095

(e)
§
0

0
0
254
0
0
23
§
0
0
0
0
1,63!
1,030
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0



20,716

1239S




4,581
750
17,263
6^570
2,908
4,161
14,613
11,821
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,044
417
550
0
3,542

1,409
952
379
2,472
3,801
35,175

6,922
662
5,537
17,535
1,372


-------
B-4:            AID                      OF       I
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Plant Name
Eastlake
Eastlake


Edfeewater
R%e«ater
E%ewster
Gen JM Gavin
Gen J M Gavin
Gorge
Oorpg
JMStuurt
JM Stuart
I M Stuart
JMStuart
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Miami Fort
Miami fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Muskingum River
Mxisktngura River
Musktfsgjim River
Mxiskingwm River
Muskingum River
Muskingiira River
Wiles
Wiles
Pieway
Poston
Fostoo

2
3
4
5
11
12
13
1
2
25
26
1
2
3
4
(30010,2.3,4.5)
I
2
3
4
5
IS
91
92
93
94
(5-1, 5-2,6)
5-1
5-2
6
7
€8014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
9
1
2

Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Table I
Tablet
Table t
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Emissions
1995 (b)
13,025
14,451
23,405
57,855
0
0
10
11.945
11,533
0
0
22,861
31,903
25,034
27,841
92,806





0
0
0
0
0
4,193



21,301
102,908




14,648
13,080
12,340
4.722
0
0
SO2
Emissions
1996 (b)
13.779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4
21,370
40,672
0
0
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226
123,599





1,433
0
0
0
0
14,421



38.985
160,368




20,223
7,110
15,375
15,071
0
0
1996
(e)
9,471
10.984
15,906
42,495
1,062
1,145
5,536
192,63?
188,168
2,553
2,860
41,189
39,041
38,712
40,925

18,773
18,072
17,439
18.218
18,247
4,508
44
80
62
102

417
417
12,475
42,216

38,001
34,026
36,130
34,153
44,364
18,504
14,321
11,961
0
0
HeMfct
Unit
as of 1/30/97
15,21?
12,267
24,809
66,063
0
0
1,036
29,789
51,449
0
0
46,681
40,631
42,976
43,222

25,148
25,148
25,148
25.148
25,148
2,180
0
0
0
0

761
762
22,889
53,170

49,026
41,533
45,741
43,862
74,080
12,608
20,249
17,843
3,797
3,542
Allowances
for
•;'•;«)
13,779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4

40,672
0
0
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226

24,719
24,720
24,720
24,720
24,720
1,433
0
0
0
0

530
531
13,360
31,985

35,477
39,555
43,563
41,173
20,223
7,110
15.375
15,071
0
0
(e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Allowances
1,438
1,668
X271
5,344
0
0
1,032
1,419
10,777
0
§
23,771
12,577
17,019
20,996

429
428
428
42S
421
747
0
0
0
0

231
231
9,529
14,115

13,549
1,978
2,178
2,089
53,857
5,498
4,874
2,772
3,797
3,542
                                                    B-4, i

-------
B-4:            AND                      OF       1
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Plant Name
Poston
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
REBwger
RE Burger
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
Toronto
Toronto
Toronto
WHSammis
WHSammis
WHSammis
Walter CBeckjord
Walter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brynner Island
Brunner Island
Brunner Hand
Brusmer Hand
Cheswick
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Hatfielifs Ferry
Hatfielcfs Ferry
Hatfiel*5 Ferry
Httfiekh Ferry
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Mitchell
Newcastle
Stack/Unit ID
3
CS000!(1,2,3,4,S,6,7,8)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5
6
7
S
6
I
2
1
2
CS102(I,2)
1
2
3
i
1
2
XS123 (1.2,3)
1
2
3
CS!02(1,2)
1
2
3
4
33
1
Unit Type (a)
Substitution

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table!
Table!
Table 1
Table!
Table I
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table!.
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!

Table!
Table 1
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
1995 (b)
0
41,658








0
0
0
12,627
27,041
22,162
8,347
17,479
4,711
17,196
7.38S
5,532
41,061


56,335
42,900
4,729
73,364
164,841



10,762


3,045
3,455
835
0
SOI
EntWoHS
1996 (b)
0
62.5S7








0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
2^761
40,041
16,4%
15,654
5,831
8,159
47,771


44,832
39,980
3,376
3,732
153,413



24,601


2,442
3,016
728
0
1996
AHwHHtew
0

2,820
2,751
2,891
2,956
4,797
4,807
21,973
23,127
5,315
9,505
10,274
26,496
43,773
47,380
9,811
25,235
17,738
15,024
10,510
11,537

27,030
31,995
60,571
38,139
95,378
85,753

55,732
57,506
56,580

12,327
12,483
12,553
11,548
1,101
1,367
HeMIn
UMttAcCMHliS
as of 1/30/97
4,642

0
0
0
0
3,371
3,371
38,245
31,751
0
0
0
26,496
43,773
47,380
26,843
46,790
18,146
17,219
14,898
15,926

33,530
40,033
106,089
42,819
20,054
20,128

58,400
63,200
52,500

19,273
19,585
12,553
11,548
800
1,367
Deducted for
0

0
0
0
0
950
958
33,743
26,906
0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
22,761
40,041
16,496
15,654
5,831
8,159

22,672
25,099
44,832
39,980
3,376
3,732

52,602
55,722
45,089

14,046
10,555
2,442
3,016
728
0
I
Provisions (e)
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
CarrWOwer
4,642

0
0
0
0
2,421
2,413
4,502
4,845
0
0
0
14,249
13,329
19,414
4,082
6,749
1,650
1,565
9,067
7,767

10,858
14,934
61,257
2,839
16,678
16,396

5,798
7,478
7,411

5,227
9,030
10,111
8,532
72
1,367
                                                     B-4,10

-------
B-4:           AID                     OF      I

PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TN
TO
TN
TN
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI


NewCaslIe
Portland
Potbnd
Shwnrilto

Shnraiile
Stawville
Shawrille
Sunbufy
Suntary
Allen
Allen
Alien
Cumberland
Cumberland
DuPont Johnsomilk
DuPetit Johss^pfilie
DuPont Johnsortfitle
DuPort Johnseiwiile
Gallatin
Gsllatm
Gallatm
Galtatin
CMlatin
Gatbtin
JahiisonviHe
Johnsormlle
Jahnsonville
Johnsotwille
Johnsoitville
Johnsonvitte
JotosofwilJe
Johnsonvilk
JohnsGiwille
Johnsonville
Johnsawille
Alma
Alma
Ataa
Edgewster

Qenot

Staefc/UiimB
2
I
2
1
2
CSt<3,4)
3
4
3
4
1
1
3
1
2
JVD1
JVD2
JVD3
JTO4
CSOA12(!,2)
!
2
CSGA34 (3, 4)
3
4
CSJO10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}
!
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CS1 (B4, B5)
B4
B5
3
4
1

Omit Type {•}
Substitution
T*!el
Table 1
Table I
Tabie 1

Tublel
Tabie 1
1
Table!
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table!
Tsblel
Opt-to
Opt-In
Opt-fc
Opt-to

I
Table 1

Table I
Table 1

Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Tabie 1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1
1

Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1

KB
EmlsslHts
1995 (h)
0
11, OSS
11,055
14,265
!0,B7
33,302


9J47
9,511
13,144
16,512
11,618
12,445
13,685
0
0
0
0
41,243


51,122


1 14,677










2,764


1,166
6,412
15,304

SO2
bnlsstaia
0
11,963
13,820
10,587
13.474
29,884


9,511
10,939
5,434
6,»3
8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0
55,363


61,303


126,367










3,471


1,482
737S
11,420
B-4, 11
1996
1,520
9,373
17,309
10,048
10,048

13,846
13,700
9,133
11,392
14,917
16,329
15,258
165,080
172,416
889
889
889
888

32,218
31,674

36,179
33,879

7,585
7,828
8,189
7,780
8,023
7,682
8,744
8,471
6,894
7,351

5,105
8,155
4,493
24,099
22,103

Ilehtfel
1,520
36,932
14,367
12,332
15,349

20,541
15,988
16,327
14,114
2X546
24,584
24,564
168,310
152,615
0
0
0
0

37,170
37,187

42,080
40,685

15.107
19,542
15,919
14,752
10,837
15,135
1 7,287
19,543
13,231
16,661

9,458
14.92S
7,820
22,249
18,598


0
11^63
13,820
10,587
13,414

16,950
1X934
9,511
10,939
5,434

8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0

25,853
29,510

28,130
33,!73

12,644
12,424
13,242
12,691
8.304
12,141
14,684
15,003
11,140
14,094

1,736
1,735
1,482
7,378
11,420

SpecUriMsel
0
9
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
§
0
0

0
0

0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

«30
0
0
0
0

CunfedOvcr
101997
1,520
24,969
S47
1.745
1,875

3,591
3,054
6,116
3,175
17,112
18,011
16,169
158,786
139,363
0
0
0
0

11317
7,677

13,950
7,512

2,463
7.118
2,677
XOS1
2,533
2,994
2,603
4,540
2,091
2,573

7.092
13,193
6,338
14,871
7,178


-------
B-4:            AND                       OF       1

we
Wl
WJ
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W¥
wv
W¥
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv

JPMsdgrtt
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
North O«k Creek
North O»k Creek
North O* Creek
North Oak Creek
Pott Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Wmshinj^on
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pultiam
PuUiam
Putliam
PuUian
PullifUn
RoekRi¥er
Rock Ri¥er
South Oak Creek
Sooth Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
Weston
Westoa
Albright
Albright
Albright
Fort Martin
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Hanrison
Harrison
Kammer
Kammer
Kaouncr
Kammer

Bi
CS1 (1, 2)
1
2
1
2
3
4
€37(1,2.3}
!
2
3
4
5
CSS6{5,6)
S
6
?
8
I
2
CS3 (5, 6)
S
6
CS4(7, 8)
7
8
I
2
I
2
3
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
0, 2, 3)
I
2
3

Sitbstitortieft

fablel
1
TaMsl
Tafclel
Tail* I
Tafcfal

Substitution
StAstitutiofi
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution

Substitution
Substitsition
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution

Table 1
Table 1

Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table I
Table 1

Table!
Table 1
Table 1

TiHel

f total
832
Emissions
1995 (b)
5,746
4,127


0
0
0
0




2,242
0
1,152


1,466
2,0$7
1,637
1,434
11,006


15.663


969
1,936
2,386
2,358
11,444
26,803
43,171
9,944



122,193



SO2
4,145
1,836


0
0
0
0
7,119



1,»1
0
1,518


1,574
Z44S
1,337
1.3S9
13,543


20.71*


1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
J7.468
16,469



119,369



1996
AHocatcd(c)
«,862

5,852
6,504
5,083
5,005
5,229
4154

1,968
3,782
3,108
2,745
3,412

2,097
2,844
7.3J7
7,312
5,398
4,034

9,416
11.723

15,754
15,375
1,579
3,580
4,831
5,024
11,684
41,905
44,118

82,613
91,180
90,727

18.247
18,948
16,932
(M
Unit


4,764
5J21
0
0
0
0

l,»i
2,44t
3.4SS

0

710
1,120
1,900

9,1 59
tf.634

8,976
5.921

11,400
11,389
1.300
2,400
1,600
2,350
10,111
31,053
41,215

6,849
4,341
6,927

45,549
5I.63S
41,6W
for
£d}
4,145

I,8»
1,956
0
§
0
0

1,110
2327
3,142
1,991
0

$92
926
1,574
2,445
1,337
1,389

8,i60
5,383

10,364
10,354
1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
37,461

6406
3,969
fi,294

43,380
36,301

(e)
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

§
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0

0
§
0
ABavnnKes
Gififcil Ower
toiff?
3,t3S

2.IS4
3,865
0
0
0
0

111
222
314
99
0

118
194
326
455
7,122
5,245

816
538

1,036
1,035
194
579
151
388
925

3,74?

643
3S
6J3

2.169
22,328
1,984
                                                     B-4. 12

-------
            B-4:               AND                              OF          1
State
WV
wv
WV
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
Hunt Name
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mt Statin
MtStonn
MtStotm
MtStonn
Rivesrilie
Rivesville
Stock/Unit ID
CS012(1,2)
1
2
CSO(1,2)
1
2
3
7
8

1
Table 1
Table!
Table!
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Embsioas
199S(b)
61,623
95,244
2,549
488
1,357
SO2
Eniaalaas
53,152
107,211
5,096
233
1,03?
1996
ABotmices
42,923
44,312
49,48!
45,203
49.S59
1,009
3,059
MeMiii
0(4*1/30/97
63,555
53,596
63,669
61,460
fi6,838
450
1400
Deincteiifer
(
-------
                                    B-5:

      I               la 1996            19,67?           for
                Is          to 0.4                                   for             10,268 of
                                            for                     9,409
                     cap



      is no         SO2          cap            I for      not        by the
           II.                                not                        I
                                 to      II                                   for the
                  at

To                     are            in                        I
                           I (1995-1999). Any Phase I unit that had a lower          in 1996
the                        the 1985-87             (i.e.,
                 it        this        by      in          to sulfur-free           (e.g.,
             or                                                                          at
           I      in the                                         units, or a         in
             If the        for the               do not fall     one or
     it is              the       1                     to                     II     and the
      I    has to                     The         of                      is      on the
                                    and the              of the       II

For 1996,                         for               at           in the
                            and Electric Corporation, Long Island Lighting Company,
        City           City, and                      Company.         Unit 1 In      York
                 the               of allowances (1,631), and Northport Unit 4,     in New York,
           the       (23

    list     for                              for                    an          for        An
             Is           to              its utilization of Its                  is below its
      -1987).                     2            4,406           for                  in 1996.



                                      are       to a
         cap                                  be                the end
                    Is          EPA did not        the cap                              in the
                                                    at the end
                      the cap Is the              limit.  For              units, on the
EPA                                the                      for                      if not,
               or           the      as             units.
                                            B-5,1

-------
As a                      cap Is            to be the                        EPA            the
                               be         to the unit,    any                   In
        are              the               However, for the          and in           the
                                          unit may effectively use                a future year
        to      the          deduction. In      instances, there will be no net deduction for
                are        this      use of future                           to a           of
                        the            and                  provisions.)

In         the          to                      the                           in 1996, EPA
         9,409           at                                  Unit B4, is         by the
                    and wis        to use                     to      Its
                            In                                   to its 1996        to
1996            and                            a future year account. The  other two units
                            the     cap           are            Unit 1 (6,147            and
                1 (2,632

For
        the                                     be         EPA                 on the
         and                     in the
     cap                  the                                     to be  a                   If
this is           to be          the                  is              and its
         Is         to EPA,                     it as a             unit for the
In 1996,             Units 2, 3, and 4                   as
                                            B-5,2

-------
C-l:

                                                      and



Alabama Power Co

QPSCO

Daityland Power Coop

East Kentucky Power Coop

Georgia Power Co

GPU


26 KCGastonAI, 1-5
7 OudsderiALl-2

862 Grand Tower tt, 07-09
863 IL 05, 06
864 Meredosia CL 0 1 -05
6017 Newton IL 1,2

4140 AlmaWIB4sB5
4143 Genoa WI 1
4271 JPMadRettWIBl

1384 Cooper KYI, 2

699 Arkwright GA 1 -4
703 Bowen GA 1 BLR - 4BLR
708 Hammond GA 1-4
709 Harllee Branch GA 2
1 1 0 Jack Mcdonough GA MB 1 ,
733 Kraft OA 1-3
6124 Meintesh GA 1
727 OA 3
6257 SchererGA3
6052 WansleyGA1,2
728 Yates GA Y2BR - Y7BR

3113 Portland PA 1,2


0.48

0.45

0.48

0.50

0.46

0.45



0.43

042

0.39

0.41

0.43

0.40
                                                   C-L 1

-------
C-i:

                                       	



Gulf Power Co


Hoosier Energy

IES Utilities, Inc.

Power Co


Indianapolis Power & Light


Monongahela Power Co


NYSEO

Northern States Power Co





















641 Crist FL 4-6
642
6073 Victor J Jr MS 1 , 2

1 043 Frank E Rails IN I SGL

1104 Burlington IA 1
1073 Prairie Creek IA 4

889 1L 3
§92
89? Vermilion IL 1,2

990 Elmer W IN 50, 60, 70
991 H T Pritehard IN 3-6
994 Petersburg IN 1-4

Albright WV 1-3
3178 Armstrong PA 2
3181
6004 PleasantsPAl,!
1570 RP Smith PA 9, 11

2527 OreenidgeNY6
2535 MHlikenNYL2

1912 High Bridge MN 3-6
6090 Saerbume County MN 1 , 2





















047


0.50

0,47

0.45


0.45


0.49


0.45

0.46





















0.41


0.47

0.31

0.40


0,36


0.38


0.41

0.30
                                                      C-1,2

-------
C-l:

                                                           and

Plan late

Ohio Edison Co



PSI Energy, Inc.

South Elcc Power

Springfield City of (MO)

TVA



6094 Brace PA 1 , 2
285? EdgewaterOHB
2858 Gorge OH 25, 26
3138 New Castle PA 1,2
2867 Toronto OH 10, 11
W H OH 5, 6

3140 Brunner PA 1-3
3148 Martins Creek PA 1 , 2
3152 Simbury PA 3, 4

1001 CayugaINl,2
6018 East Bend IN 2
6113 Gibson IN 1-3
2832 Fort OH 6
1008 R Gallagher IN 1-4
1010 River IN 2-6
Walter C OH 5. 6

606 1 R D Morrow MS 1 , 2

2161 James River MO 3-5
6195 Southwest MO 1

4? Colbert AL 1-4
3403 GallatinTNl-4
3406 Johrisonville TN 1 - 1 0


0.50

0.4?

0,48
I


0,42

0.41

0.42

0.50

0,4?

0.50

0.48


0.48

0.44

                                                        C-l, 3

-------
           C-l:
                  Utility
      Code         Name, State and


Union Electric Co
Wisconsin Electric Power
Wisconsin Public Service Corp
2103
2104
6155
4040
4041
4042
4072
4078
LabadieMOl-4
Meramee MO 1 -4
Rush Island MO 1,2
Port Washington WI1 -4
South Oak Creek WI 5-8
Valley WI 1-4	
Pulliain WI 7,8
Weston WI 1-3
                                                                          C-l, 4

-------
C-2:       1 NOr                                          for 1996
ST
EL
GA
IN
IN
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
MD
MD
MD
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
wv
WV
WV
W¥
WV
WV
WV
Plant Name
Crist
Yates
Gibson
Wabash River
Coleman
Coleman
Coieman
E W Brown
E W Brown
Ghent
HMP&L Station 2
HMP&L Station 2
Chalk Point
Morgatrtown
Morgantown
R E Burger
R E Burger
Armstrong
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Operating Utility
Gulf Power Co
Georgia Power Co
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Kentucky Utilities Co
Kentucky Utilities Co
Kentucky Utilities Co
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Potomac Electric Power Co
Potomac Electric Power Co
Potomac Electric Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
West Penn Power Co
GPU Generation Corporation
GPU Generation Corporation
Monongahela Power Co
Monongahela Power Co
Monongahela Power Co
MonoQgahela Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
ORE
Code
641
728
6113
1010
1381
1381
1381
1355
1355
1356
1382
1382
1571
1573
1573
2864
2864
3178
3118
3118
3943
3944
3944
3944
3954
3954
3954

1
Y1BR
4
1
Cl
C2
C3
2
3
1
HI
H2
1
1
2
7
8
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
•2
3
Extension
Type
40CFRPart72
40CFRPart72
40CFRPart72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR. Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 76
40 CFR Part 76
40CERPart76
1996 Unit
Extension
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Aug-97
Ol-Jan-98
Ol-Jan-97
0.48
0.47
0.35
0.29
0.49
0.46
1.28
0.42
0.42
0.56
0.83
0.62
0.77
0.65
0.65
0.74
0.72
0.36
0.43
0.40
0.59
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.84
0.84
0.79
                                                  C-2,1

-------
fur the 239                    In
                                       1996
ST
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
CM
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA

Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
Oadsden
Gadsden
Big
Crist
Crist
Crist
Scholz
Seholz
ArkwrigM
Arkwright
Arkwright
Arfcwright
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Hammond
Hammond

TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Tampa Electric Co
Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
" Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
onus
Code
4?
4?
47
47
47
26
26
26
26
26
7
7
645
641
641
641
642
642
699
699
699
699
703
703
703
703
708
708
Boiler
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
I
2
BB04
4
5
6
1
2
1
2
•>
,">
4
1BLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BLR
1
2
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.44
0.40
0.40
0.41
0.41
0.43
0.61
0.65
0.37
0.50
0.61
0.45
0.62
0.70
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.42
0.43
0.45
0.45
0.78
0.78
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.48
0.48
0,48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43

0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
%
Rate to 1996
0.80
0.67
0.83
0.86
0.78
0.90
0.78
0.80
0.80
0.78
0.51
0.56
0.46
0.43
0.49
1.04
0.69
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.67
0.65
0.56
0.58
0.84
0.84
-46%
-36%
-48%
-50%
-44%
-56%
^9%
-49%
-49%
-45%
20%
16%
-20%
16%
24%
-57%
-10%
-13%
-8%
-8%
-8%
-8%
-37%
-34%
-20%
-22%
-7%
-7%
         C-3,1

-------
C-3:                                       for the 239                    in
                                                                                1996
ST
GA
OA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
Plant
Hammond
Hammond
Harllee Branch
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Mcintosh
Mitchell
Scherer
Wansley
Wansley
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yaies
Yates
Burlington
Milton L Kapp
Prairie Creek
Riverside
Baldwin
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Hennepin
Operating Utility
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Savannah Electric & Power
Savannah Electric & Power
Savannah Etectric & Power
Savannah Electric & Power
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
IES Utilities. Inc.
Interstate Power Co
IES Utilities, Inc.
Midamericaii Energy Co
Illinois Power Co
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
Illinois Power Co
QMS
Code
708
708
709
710
710
733
733
733
6124
727
6257
6052
6052
728
728
728
728
728
728
1104
1048
1073
1081
889
862
862
862
892
Boiler
3
4
2
MB1
MB2
1
2
3
1
3
3
I
2

Y3BR
Y4BR
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR
I
2
4
9
J
1
8
9
i
&
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard I, imitation
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
050
0.50
030
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.78
0.45
0.74
0.40
0.40
0.59
0.59
0.59
0.81
0.61
0.28
0.39
0.41
0.49
0.49
0.41
0.41
0.33
0.31
0.32
0.34
0.29
0.37
0.36
0.73
0.77
0.56
0.52
Avg
Plan
Unit
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0,46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.47

0.47

0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Avg
Plan
late
0.43
0,43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.31

0.31

0.40
0.42
0,42
0.42
0.40
% Change
Emission from 1990
to 1996
0.84
1.20
0.99
0.66
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.83
0.61
0.20
0.73
0.67
0.62
0.62
0.56
0.65
0.67
0,61
0.63
0.80
1.05
0.82
0.67
0.78
0.96
0.64
0.59
-7%
-63%
-25%
-39%
-33%
48%
48%
48%
-2%
0%
40%
47%
-39%
-21%
-21%
-27%
-37%
-5!%
-49%
-49%
-58%
-72%
-55%
-46%
-6%
-20%
-13%
-12%

-------
C-3:                                      for the     NOX              In 1996
                                                                             1996
ST
IL
IL
1L
1L
1L
EL
EL
IL
EL
BL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
EL
IN
M
M
IN
IN'
M
IN
IN
IN
IN
M
Plant Name
Hutsonville
i lutsonvilte
Joppa Steam
Joppa StcaiB
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Meredosia
Meredosta
Meredosia
Meredosia
Mercdosia
Newton
Newton
Vennillon
Vermilion
Cayuga
Cayuga
Elmer W Stout
timer W Stout
Timer W Stout
F B Culley
F B Culley
Frank E Ratts
Frank E Ratts
Gibson
Gibson
Operating Utility
C1PSCO
CIPSCO
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric F.nergy Inc
ESeetrie Energy Inc
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
Illinois Power Co
- Illinois Power Co
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Southern Indiana Gas & Eke
Southern Indiana Gas & Hlec
Hoosier Fnergy
Hoosier Energy
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
OMB
Code
863
863
887
887
887
887
887
887
864
864
864
864
864
6017
6017
897
897
1001
1001
990
990
990
1012
1012
1043
1043
6113
6113
Boiler
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
1
2
1
2
1
2
50
60
70
2
3
1SG1
2SG1
1
2
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation-
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging PJan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.45
0.45
0.45
0,45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
050
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.54
O.S6
0.2?
0,27
0.24
0.24
0.25
0.25
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.64
0.30
0.34
0.29
0.29
0.35
0.36
03?
0.38
0,33
0.45
0.45
0.49
0.46
0.51
0.51
Avg
Plan
Limit
0,45
0-45






0.45
0.45
0,45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.48
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.45


0.50
0.50
0,48
0.48
Avg
Plan
Eate
0.42
0.42






0.42
0.42
0.42
0,42
0,42
0.42
0.42
0.40
0.40
0.42
0.42
0.36
0,36
0.36


0.47
0.47
0.42
0.42
%
1990
to 1996
0.70
0.67
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.67
0.47
0.39
0.94
0.74
0.42
0.47
0.63
0.65
0.71
1.05
1.23
1.08
1.09
1.03
1.12
-23%
-16%
-52%
-52%
-57%
-57%
-55%
-55%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-4%
-36%
-13%
-69%
-61%
-17%
-23%
-41%
-42%
-54%
-57%
-63%
-55%
-58%
-50%
-54%
                                                 C-3. 3

-------
C-3:                                          for the                         in
                                                                                      1996
ST
IN
IN
JN
IN
IN
IN
m
IN
M
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KY
ICY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY

Gibson
H T
H T Pritdiard
H T Pritehard
H T Pritchard
Petersburg
Petersburg
Petersburg
Petersburg
R Gallagher
R
R
R
Wabash River
Wabash River
Wabash River
Wabash River
LA Cygne
Quindaro
Cooper
Cooper
EW Brown
East Bend
Elmer Smith
Green River
H L Spurloek
R D Green
R D Green

PS! Energy, Inc.
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy. Inc.
PSI Energy. Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy'. Me.
Kansas City Power & Light
of Pub. UtiL, KS City
East Kentucky Power Coop
East Kentucky Power Coop
Kentucky Utilities Co
Cincinnati Gas 
-------
C-3:                                         for the 239                    in
                                                                                   1996
m
MD
MD
MD
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO

Chalk Point
R P
HP Smith
J H


High Bridge
High Bridge
Comity
County
Hawthorn
Man,
James River
James River

Labadie

Labadie
Labadie
Merainee
Meramec
Mcramec
Meramec
Montrose
Montrose
Montrose



PEPCO
Potomac Edison Co
Potomac Edison Co
Consumers Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Springfield City of (MO)
Springfield City of (MO)
Springfield City of (MO)
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
O1IS
Code
1571
!570
1570
1710
1912
1912
1912
1912
6090
6090
2079
6065
2161
2161
2161
2103
2103
2103
2103
2104
2104
2104
2104
2080
2080
2080
6155
6155
Boiler
2
9
11
1
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
1
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
Conipltaiee
Approach
ABL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
AEL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Uniit
1.20
0.50
045
0.55
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Eiiils-
slini
Rate
1.02
0,54
0.41
0.44
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.25
0.25
0.38
0.29
0.56
0.64
0.56
0.18
0.22
0.24
0.22
0.71
0,65
0.83
0.37
0.36
0.39
0.39
0.22
0.20
Avg
flan
Limit

0.49
0.49

0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
046


0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45



0.45
0.45
Avg
flan

0.3S
0.3S

0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30


0.48
0.48
0.48
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25



0.25
0.25
%
to
1.35
0.87
0.78
0.69
0.48
0.48
048
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.36
0.31
1.02
0.87
0.93
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.82
0.63
0.96
1.17
032
0.34
0.34
0.63
0-63
-24%
-38%
-47%
-36%
21%
21%
21%
21%
-44%
-44%
6%
-6%
-45%
-26%
-40%
-71%
-65%
-61%
-65%
-13%
3%
-14%
-68%
13%
15%
15%
-65%
-61%
                                                     C-3,5

-------
C-3:                                      for the 239                    in
                                                                               19%
ST
MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Plant
Southwest
Thomas Hill
Jack Watson
Jack Watson
R D Morrow
R D Morrow
Victor J Daniel Jr
Victor J Daniel Jr
Dunkirk
Dunkirk
Gree nidge
Milliken
Milliken
Ashtabnla
Conesville
Conesvilte
Eastlake
Eastlake
Eastlake
Easflake
Edgewater
Gorge
Gorge
Miami Fort PSI
Picway
Toronto
Toronto
W H
Operating Utility
Springfield City of (MO)
Associated Bleetne Coop Inc
Mississippi Power Co
Mississippi Power Co
South Mississippi El Pwr
South Mississippi El Pwr
Mississippi Power Co
Mississippi Power Co
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
NYSEO
NYSEG
NYSEG
Cleveland Electric ffiuni Co
Columbus Southern Power
Columbus Southern Power
Cleveland Electric Uluna Co
Cleveland Electee Dtum Co
Cleveland Electric Khun Co
Cleveland Electric fltam Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
Columbus Southern Power
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
OM1S
Code
6195
2168
2049
2049
6061
6061
6073
6073
2554
2554
2527
2535
2535
2835
2840
2840
2837
2837
2837
2837
2857
2858
2858
2832
2843
2867
2867
2866
Boiler
1
MB3
4
5
1
2
1
2
3
4
6
1
2
7
3
4
1
2
3
4
13
25
26
6
9
10
11
5
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation.
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Pfan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.35
0.30
0.44
0.53
0.43
0.51
0.30
0.32
033
0.33
0.54
0.38
0.38
0.40
0.45
0.41
0.39
0.37
0.38
0.37
0.17
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.63
0.41
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.43
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.50

0.47
0.4?
0.50
0.50
0.47
0.47


0.45
0.45
0.45







0.50


0.48



0.50
A-vg
Rate
0.48

0.41
0.41
0,47
0.47
0.41
0.41


0.41
0.41
0.41







0.42


0.42



0.42
1990
Emission
0.47
0.31
1.10
1.22
0.42
0.43
0.27
0.28
0.48
0.48
0.55
0.66
0.59
0.61
0.93
0.55
0.49
0.68
0.54
031
O.S7


0.73
0,87


0.52
%
from 1990
to 1996
-26%
-3%
-60%
-57%
2%
19%
11%
14%
-31%
-31%
-2%
-42%
-36%
-34%
-52%
-25%
-20%
-46%
-30%
-27%
-80%


-14%
-53%


-17%

-------
C-3:                                       for the 239                   In
                                                                                1996
ST
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TO
TN
TN
TN

W H Sainmis
Walter C
Walter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brunnor Island
Brunner Island
Brenner Island
Cbeswiek
Marlins Creek
Martins Creek
Mitchell
New Castle
New Castle
Portland
Portland
Sfiawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Siinbury
Sunburv
Oallatin
Oailatin
Oallatin
Oallatin
Johnson ville
Operating Utility
Ohio Edison Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
West Peon Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
PP&L
PP&L
PP&L
Duquesne Light Co
PP&L
PP&L
West Perm Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
PP&L
PP&L
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
OR1S
Code
2866
2830
2830
3178
6094
6094
3140
3140
3140
8226
3148
3148
3181
3138
3138
3113
3113
3131
3131
3131
3131
3152
3152
3403
3403
3403
3403
3406
Boiler
6
5
6
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
2
33
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.45
045
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.42
0.39
0.37
039
040
0.43
037
0.37
0.42
0.38
0.49
0.49
0.41
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.31
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.39
0.39
0.40
0.40
047
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.50
048
0.48
049
0.50
0.50
0.47
0.47
0.47

0.47
047
049


0.45
0.45




0.47
0.47
0.4S
0.4S
0.48
0.41
0.48
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.38
0.42
042
0.41
0.41
0.41

0.41
0.41
0.38


0.40
0.40




0.41
041
0.44
044
0.44
0.44
0.44
1990
Endssfam
Rate
1.10
0.72
0.71
1.04
0.98
1.13
0.65
0.71
0.83
0.71
1.03
0.93
0.68


0.46
0.66
0.99
1.02
O.S3
0.82
0.93
1.29
0.59
0.63
0.59
0.55
0.45
»/•
1990
to 1996
-62%
-46%
-48%
-63%
-59%
-62%
-43%
-48%
-49%
-46%
-52%
-47%
-40%


-33%
-27%
-52%
-53%
-48%
-48%
-54%
-67%
-34%
-38%
-32%
-27%
4%
                                                   C-3. 7

-------
C-3:                                     tor the                      In
                                                                            1996
ST
TM
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
UT
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI

Johnsonvillc
Johnson ville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnson ville
Johnson¥ille
Johnsonville
Johnsomdile
Johnsonville
Oadsby
Alma
Alma
Genoa
J P
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pulliain
Pulliam
South Oak
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
Valley
Valley
Valley
Operating Utility
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
Paciiicorp
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
QMS
Code
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3648
4140
4140
4143
4271
4040
4040
4040
4040
4040
4072
4072
4041
4041
4041
4041
4042
4042
4042
Boiler
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
3
B4
B5
1
Bl
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
A%'cragiog Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
- Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.08
0.76
0.76
0.36
0.30
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.29
Not Op.
0.24
0.42
0.23
0.23
0.38
0.38
0.46
0.46
0.47
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48

0.47
0.47
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44

0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35

0.37
0.37
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
1990
Emission
0.48
0.46
0.54
0.45
0.50
1.00
0.97
1.10
1.07
0.53
0.85
0.85
0.75
0.30
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.37

0.69
0,57
0.28
0.28
0.66
0.67
1.10
1.10
1.05
%
from
to
-2%
2%
-13%
4%
-6%
-53%
-52%
-57%
-56%
-85%
-9%
-9%
-52%
0%
6%
6%
6%
-22%

•65%
-26%
-18%
-18%
-42%
-43%
-58%
-58%
-55%

-------
C-3:                                         for the     NOX               in
                                                                                   1996
ST
WI
Wl
WI
WI
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
WY
WY
WY
WY
Plant
Valley
Weston
Westoo
Weston
Albright
Albright
Albright
Mitchell
Mitchell
Pleasants
Pleasants
Jim Bridger
Jim Bridger
Jim Bridger
Wyodak
Operating Utility
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Monongabela Power
Monongahela Power
Monongahela Power
Ohio Power Co
Ohio Power Co
Monongahela Power
Monongahela Power
Paciticorp
Pacificorp
Pacificorp
Pacificorp
OEIS
Code
4042
407i
4078
4078
3942
3942
3942
3948
3948
6004
6004
8066
8066
8066
6101
Boiler
4
1
2
3
I
2
3
I
2
I
2
BW71
BW72
BW73
BW91
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
AEL Demonstration
AEL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Ends-
ilom
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.56
0.56
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
Ends-
am
Mate
0.47
0.76
0.85
0.21
0,65
0,68
0.39
0.52
0.52
0.40
0.32
0.40
0.37
0.38
0.33
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.41
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.49
0.49
0.49


0.49
0.49




Avg
Pbn
0,35
037
0.37
0.37
0.38
0.38
0.38


0.38
0.38




!§»§
Endsskm
Rate
0.93
0.90
1.08
0.26
1.10
1.10
0.71
0.77
0.77
0.52
0.35
0.63
0.51
0.42
0.37
%
•49%
-16%
-21%
-19%
-41%
-38%
-45%
-32%
-32%
-23%
-9%
-37%
-27%
-10%
-11%
                                                     C-3, 9

-------
           C-4:               of




1.                    Evaluation for      Unit Compliance

        (B)

        The NO,             for        Is         to the            NO^            at the    as
                                            (AEL) or an AEL                   this     is


          (1) For a unit     a            or

                       If unit NO,        rate s unit NOX

                  Unit                is

            else

                                      is

          (2) For a    in a                   with other units        for the specific compliance year:

            a. Locate the associated Stack ID for the unit in the ARCONFIG file.

            b. If stack NOX emission rate s unit NOX emission limit

                  Unit                is

              else

                                      is Fail.

          (3) For a unit  with a complex stack configuration:

            a. Locate all               IDs in ARCONFIG file.

            b.              NOX        rate for all

            c.               NOX            s NO,

                                      is

              else

            d Calculate NOX pounds for the unit as apportioned to the unit from each
                                                                     ,


                NO,        = A          JVC?,              * C/nft                           *e
                                                   C-4,1

-------
      C-4:               of NO,

       e.  Calculate the total NO, pounds for the unit:


                                 =                 M?,


       f. Calculate the allowable NOX pounds for the unit:


                          WO,       =     M7,               * Actual Unit


       g.  Determine compliance on a NOX pounds basis for the unit:

             If Unit NOK Pounds Emitted < Unit Allowable NOX Pounds

                  Unit compliance      is Pass

             else

                  Unit compliance status is Fail.


(b)

If the unit                is fail,       emissions are computed as follows:

     (1) Compute allowable pounds from the unit:


           NOX                 = Unit NO., Emission Limit * Actual Annual Unit


     (2) Compute       emitted     the unit:

       a.   For a unit associated with a specific stack, multiple stacks, or in a single common stack with other units
           affected for the specific compliance year:


              NOt Pounds        = Actual NO, Emission      * Actual Annual Unit


       b.  For a unit in a complex stack configuration:


               NOX Pounds         = Sum of (Unit Apportioned Heat Input front Each Stack *
                             Actual NOS          Rate for Each Stack)
                                              C-4,2

-------
            C-4:               of



          (3)                                 to           place):
                  AH?,                 =                     - M?,                  /






2,                         of      in




     (a)




     For     averaging plan, a NO, emissions limit is calculated as follows,




          ( 1 ) Calculate the allowable NOX pounds for the     unit in the plan:






              Unit NOX Pounds Allowable  = Unit NO, Emission Limit * Actual Annual Unit Heat






          (2) Calculate the     allowable NO, pounds for the plan:






                                                    = Sum o/AU      NO,






          (3) Calculate the total actual heat input for the plan:






                     Total Actual     Input for Plan =     of Annual      Input for All






          (4) Calculate the allowable NOX emission rate for the plan:






                NOt                      =• T0tatNOx        Allowable for      / Total     Input for Plan






          (5) Calculate the NOX pounds for each unit:






                  OttUNOx                       NOX              *






          (6)         the NOX       for the







                     NO,                  the     =           Unit NOX






          (7)         the                   for the






                    fotol      Input for the     =     of the Annual      Input for Each Unit







                                                   C-4, 3

-------
         C-4:               of  NOS

        (8) Calculate the Annual NO, emission rate for the plan:


                      Annual NOS         Rate for the     = NOX
                                    Annual Heat Input for the


        (9) Determine NOX compliance for the plan:

              If Annual NO, Emission Rate for the Plan s  Allowable NOX             for the Plan

                                       is

              else

                                       is Fail,


        (b)

   If the plan compliance status is fail,      emissions are         in     to                as follows:


NO,                »(Total NO,       Emitted/or               NO,                            /
                                               C-4,4

-------
SERA
               ,: '.'•..'  ;' •- ';•

           • ' •'.-.-".•'..y •'. '•
                        ' :

                   -;::'.'., "' •
   •                ;:  -\ '   •
        '   :   "''    ''


-------