&EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation
EPA430-R-97-025
June 1997
1996 Compliance Report
ACID RAIN PROGRAM
Plants Affected by Phase I of the Acid Rain Program in 1996
-------
The Title IV 1990 Air Act
for of (SO2) and (NOJ, the
a to the use of
The a cap on the of SO2 that be
by at in 1980, for
to sets
NOX- (to for a 2?
1990 The is in two
I in 1995 for SO2 and for NOXS and will last until II for both
in 2000 and is to 2,000 In 1996, 431 by
the SO2 223 for NOX, and an
16 by the NOX
and and to the at
In rain the and
and SO2 and NOX
and and to and
SO2 a
and that '
the a for SO2 and an
cap the The
S02 is a to ton of
SO2. be or by or else in
for and ail
are to to the
to
The NOX is -and an
for all Is to this
as can the
by the or to
at it is or to
at a " -
At the end the
For the NOX an
at or For SO2, are a . -
SO2 be to for the
At the the a in its
(ATS) or the SO2 In
to 1995-1999 I to
as SO2 be or for use In
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 1
TO THE
The 1996 Compliance the under EPA's Acid Program during the first
with the NOX and the year the SO2 program.
100 for both the set
by the Clean Air Act of 1990. With to NOX, utility
by an of 40 below 1990 levels, 33 percent NOX in the process, and
an of 18 the For SO2,
of 1995 35 below 1996
levels.
The Acid Rain is unique in it embodies two types of pollution control systems,
cap and trade, and and control. Though very
in 1996, the S02 has in to
the NOX There are the
programs be into account in any comparison, but the environmental benefit of the earlier
and SO2 are a in the of
properly
The early of SO2 under the Acid Program has EPA to assist in the
of other to to at lower
costs. For EPA is acting as a to the of the
Transport in the of a cap and for NOX will
with the National Ambient Air Quality for ozone.
the is to and to
is the of electronic for SO2 to
the and resources of market Another is the of automated
electronic to submissions of quarterly emissions reports from utilities in order to the
of data. In addition, the Acid Program is every to convey
and timely to the public. This
on the SO2 to All our is
available on our frequently at http://www.epa.gov/acidrain.
In the year, EPA to monitor and the of Acid
We to news.
J.
Director, Acid
-------
lii for SO, and MOX in
2,000 and to as "units")
In the U.S., all 445 by the SO2 and NOX I
in met
All 431 to S02 in 1996 to
5,453,028
65 and 45 1995 and 1996 that
for all of the (5,433,351, or 99 for
but as by the
All 239 to the NOX in 1996
Two twenty three of these units to SO2
16 for NOX.
I 35
in 2.9 (or 35 the 8.3 ton as
by 1996 an 3,4
or 1995, the of allowances in 1996 11.7 million, of
only 45 percent. Actual emissions for the 431 units participating
in 1996, by (CEMS), 5.4 tons, up
100,000 of the 445 in 1995,
I 40 In
33
The are impressive for the first year of
1NOX in
reducing 18 below the
in 1996, I utility on
dropped their by 40
1990 an of 0.65
of NOX per Btu to
an of 0.39 the
at the 239 for
1996 resulted in levels approximately
340,000 tons (or 33 1990
1990
1996
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 3
The by in the Acid Program to provide
of the ever by the EPA, For the of the
monitors were demonstrated to be accurate and their availability was excellent. Statistics reflect
monitor of the universe of utility by I II of the
program.
Accuracy: 98 of the and the relative accuracy
on the first attempt, the the
following monitor SO2 a
accuracy (i.e., deviation from the reference test method) of 3.3 percent; flow
monitors, 3.5 percent; and NOX monitors, 3,3
Availability: SO2 flow monitors a of 99.0 and 99.2 percent,
respectively, while NOX a availability of 98,5 percent.
from 1995
Activity in the continued to in 1996. The volume
between unrelated parties in economically trades doubled from 1.9 million in 1995
to 4,4 million in 1996, More 50 percent of Phase I utility
in a with an utility, broker, or fad
In mid-1995, the average price of an allowance was about $130. By the EPA's auction in March
of 1996, the of a to $68, in to
the low costs of compliance in 1995. Also a in the low price was the
over compliance and the of allowances. By the end of 1996, however, prices
had up the $90 range and by April, 1997 $115, to to
the $90 - 100 in May 1997.
-------
1996 Compliance
Page 4
1996
is to all and the
in 1996, the I for and the
I for NOX. All ISO2 the to
to and all INOX met the
by the Air Act of
1 a the
1999. The that the in 1 are
for SO2 and NOX in 1997, the
to by the
1
I
soz
NO,
1
Compensating
Opt-in
TOE4I
1
Substitution
Early-Election
(_:_ /;..
263
182
0
445
NA
NA
NA
AM
• .. .^M?: . ;,
263
161
7
¥J1
144
95
NA
JJf
Ift9f';:'::l;
263
Variable
Variable
170
95
Variable
If ::"::-
263
Variable
Variable
171
95
Variable
-
263
Variable
Variable
171
95
Variable
Farialfc
This the and for I
on 1996 and for SO2 and
and for SO2 and
for NOX
SO,
431 for In
424 and in
to to 431 are in
A and 263 to I, 161
not to II, but to as of
and as
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 5
The core 263 utility units, at 110 power plants, were selected by Congress In the 1990
to the Clean Air Act were the and units. These
57 of all utility in 1985, and had 2.5 to 10,2 Ibs
of an of 4.2 are to as
"Table 1 units" they are officially in Table I of the 40
CFR73.10.
An 161 in 1996 by Table 1 to
as or units. A unit I as a
a 1 in its reduction A I as a
unit can provide to for a Table 1 its
below its baseline. Appendix B-1 contains a of substitution
units, and Appendix B-2 the of these units to their Table 1
In 1996, were 160 and one
this is the of seven opt-in the in July. The Opt-in
not to in the Acid the to the
program on a voluntary basis, continuous monitoring (CEMS), reduce their S02
and receive their own allowances.
In 1996, 14 in 1995. The in
by the ISO2 is due to the and exit in
and of one or of the 263 Table 1
and the entry of opt-in sources. In 1995, were 182 substitution and compensating units, whereas
in 1996, the ntimber fell to 161, and opt-in to the program.
1996 SO2 S.3
The of in a particular year, the year's
SO2 emissions level, is the sum of allowance allocations to sources under several provisions of
the Act. In 1996, the by the for the 431 was
8,3 tons. However, the SO2 level in 1996 11.7
8.3 1996 the and an 3.4
over, or 1995.
The initial allocation and the allowances for substitution and units represent the
to that to SO2 the Acid Rain Program. Additional
for the 1996 the
1993. in 1996 in the Act, which are
in 2 on the following In over
years (banked allowances) are for compliance and in the allowable total.
-------
1996 Compliance
Page 6
2
of
Allocation
Phase I
Allowances for Substitution Units
Allowance Auctions
Allowances for Compensating Units
Opt-in Allowances
Diesel Allowances
Conservation Allowances
1996
1995 ALLOWANCES
1996
• Naail&eHief: ;i;|
5,550,789
1,336,735
1,160,342
150,000
15,085
48,499
29,411
5,68?
8,296,548
3,435,789
11,732,337
||P:
if-!!:-;iiliijlliiii;i::- '; y:;:,:- :: '.'.": ' - - "W^ };-;'?ffe' «l-
Initial Allocation is the of to
on. in the
Clean Air Act and Act.
Phase I are to Phase I that
their by 90 or their reduction
obligations to units that reduce their by 90 percent.
Allowances for Substitution Units are the initial allocation granted
to Phase II units which Phase I as substitution units.
Allowance Auctions provide allowances to the that were set
in a Special the initial allowance
allocation
Allowances for Units are the initial allocation
to Phase 11 which Phase I as
units.
Opt-in Allowances are provided to the
voluntarily.
Small Diesel Allowances are to
that produce and fuel the
previous year. These can be 1999.
Conservation Allowances are to utilities that
efficiency renewable The allowances
from a special Conservation Renewable Energy Reserve set
aside when the initial allowance allocation was made.
Allowances are over 1 995 and can be
for compliance in 1996 or any year.
in the 2000 at the II, the to the
I will be and the to will be to
the cap for all an 25
will be 9.48 2000-2009. In 2010, the cap will be to 8.95
a half of industry-wide in 1980.
-------
1996 Compliance Report
Page?
I SO2 by 35
an in the of 1995, the !
of 1996 still at a level 35 below 1996 as in 3.
These to 5.4 million of SO2, 45 of the 11.7
in 1996, B-3 the 1996 and for
all I as well as a to in 1995.
3
of
(Millions of Tons)
Table 1 Unite
S 8, C Unife* 2J
Other** £2
TOTALS
'88 Allocation :
S.SS
1.33 i
1.86 ;
6.74 i
'05 Emissions
'96 Allocation
4,46 S.SS
0.65
0.00
5.30
(BB Emissions
4.7?
1.18 i 0.63
1.ST 0.04
8.30
5.44
* Th»r« w»r» 182 sybsitution and compensating units and 1995 and 161 such units in 1996,
** Th» source of the "other™ emissions In 198S Is the 7 opt-In units tor 7/1/96 - 12/31/96. The "other"
allocations in both years consist of Phase I Extension, opt-in, di«»»l, conservation annual
auction allowances.
to 1995, the 263 Table 1 by approximately 315,000 tons, or 7
in 1996, their by 4 However, the 4.8
by these Table 1 units were still substantially below their 1996 allocation of 5.6 million tons.
The majority of Table 1 (54 percent) relative to 1995 by an of
7,300 tons. Most of the Table 1 units in by an
of 5,500 tons 1995 levels. The Table 1 the
of 1995.
-------
1996 Compliancy Report Page 8
In of utilization, one-third of Table 1 levels by an of 16
The 159 units, however, or 1995 utilization levels, with an
of approximately 34 percent.
Table 1 for the in 1995
and 1996. Review of the in this reveals utilization
to be at a contributing factor, if not the factor, for of these increases. At several
for the rise occurred due to the use
in to the providing coal expensively. Another
a utilization increase coupled with scrubber difficulties, resulting in lower removal
in 1995. A a in occurred is solely to a
utilization the unit an outage in 1995, but throughout 1996.
review of the in in 1996 relative to 1995 scrubber
or use of the The of the
reductions from in utilization, in by for or
control upgrades.
and in 1996 a of their
allocation than in 1995. In 1996, 161 units were responsible for emitting approximately 630,000
of SO2, only half of their 1.2 million allocation. In 1995, on the 183
substitution and approximately 850,000 tons of SO2, or 65 of their
level.
Of the 161 in 1996, one-third to 1995 levels by an of
1,300 tons. Almost 40 percent of the by an of 1,500
tons. The remainder of the units their status as
The of utilization for 40 of substitution and
] 995 to 1996, by an of 36 percent. These from less one percent
to over 200 percent. Approximately 35 percent of units a in utilization, by an
of 26 The 20 of substitution and
levels of zero.
Opt-in 48,499 in 1996 as a of their levels, but
only 37,000 to 1996 levels. These
July I.
for
The total of allowances deducted in 1996 was 5,453,028, which represents approximately 65
of all 1996 issued. Almost all (99.6 of the allowances were for
4 on the following as well as the
remaining bank of 1995 and 1996 allowances.
At an the to the at
the the a For the of
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 9
for at a the utility allowed to the
proportion the as as were
to cover the of tons If no was EPA deducted
the the to cover by the
B-4 the for at the apportionment
Units a are the for
In 1996, 1 a total of 5,433,351 for Of the 431
Unit 3 in the for (146,291), while
6 in 1995, Fifty not at all the year
no Half of the 6,786 or the
number of allowances at a unit 12,606.
The 0.4 (19,67?) of were for underatilization
caps, which are in in B-5.
4
>
Table 1 Unit Accounts 7,687,094
Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts 1,244,952
Opt-in Accounts 44,050
Other Accounts** 2,756,241
1996 Allowances P^dutted EOT Elusions 5,433,351
Table 1 Unit Accounts 4,765,251
Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts 630,810
Opt-in Unit Accounts 37,290
1996 I Pro¥isioiis*** 19,677
Table 1 Unit Accounts 3,178
Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts 12,093
Opt-in Unit Accounts 4,406
6,279,309
Table 1 Unit Accounts 2,918,665
Substitution & Compensating Unit Accounts 602,049
Opt-in Unit Accounts 2,354
Other Accounts** 2,756,241
* The number of allowances held in the Allowance Tracking System (ATS) accounts equals the number of 1996 allowances allocated (see
Exhibit 2) plus the number of 1995 banked allowances. January 30,1997 represents the Allowance Transfer Deadline, the point in time
at which the 1996 Phase 1 affected unit accounts are frozen and after which no transfers of 1996 allowances will be recorded. The freeze
on these accounts is removed when annual reconciliation is complete.
** Other accounts refers to general accounts within the ATS that can be held by any utility, individual or other organization, and unit
accounts for units not affected in Phase I,
***Allowances were deducted for both underatilization and cap provisions in 1996 (see Appendix B-5 for a thorough explanation).
-------
1996 Compliance Report
Page 10
the SO2
The provided by the the 431 in 1996 to a
variety of to SO2 reduction obligations, including scrubber installation,
switching, The of the has
the to overcontrol SO2 in to
for use in years, to
for control by allowances The flexibility in
is of the for all
in the one is to one ton
of SO2. The all 431 to be in in 1996 and
the cost as to the of a technological
mandate.
The a ton of SO2 the be in the
The to be the Air Act
and the price of allowances this. The of compliance was
at $400-1 QGO/ton, but to a low of just at the 1996
this low, however, the of a to $115 in
1997, as the of 1996 to 1995 In May,
to decline the in the $90-100 observers
lower allowance the first two of the are
to lower and
the of allowances and 5 the
1994, Corporation and
Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Services.
5
SO2
Allowance Prto« In dollar*
160
Cantor Fitzgerald
Emission* Exchange
140
12O
1OO
80
60
12/84
12/96
Month / Yisar
6/96
12/96
-------
1996 Compliance Report
Page II
Activity in the the to in 1996,
There as in 1996 as in 1995, and the
in or
In or
the 1,9 in 1995 to 4.4
in 1996, as in 6. 50 I in
33 in a with an or fuel
company. Growth is in the only
by all by the
has by 130 700,000 in 1995 to 1.6 In
1996.
6
of in
Volume of
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
1994
1S9S
1996
EPA to to in the by quickly
efficiently recording reported to the Agency in the Allowance Tracking System (ATS), the
to In 1996, EPA 83 of
24 of receipt, up the 1995 of 81 Ninety-
5 days. These on
and are on the Acid Division's site (www.epa.gov/acidrain) on a
in to inform Also are
and
-------
1996 Compliance Report
12
235 for
239 to the I for NOX in
1996. of "Group 1"
boilers) by the IS02 in 1995. There 115 dry wall-fired
and 124 in the 239
are in A and 144 1 an 95
I to aid in the SO2 1
95 by SO2 in 1995, but no
for SO2 in 1996. for NOX I, In
with the Clean Air Act. All 239 utility by the NOX in 1996 will
the 1999.
and 0,45
the NOX on all
Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act required EPA to NOX
(in of NOX per for coal-
in two In 1995, EPA in 40 CFR 76 NOX
for with 1 ISO2
I, Group 1 to NOX of 0,50 for dry
wall-fired 0.45 for on 1, 1996.
7 the of Phase! by type. Note are not
in 7. Early-election are II to
the I (in 1997) in for not to the II
2008.
7
to NOX in I
Type
Tangetttially fired Boilers
Dry Bottom Wall-fired Boilers
:
Sfamiarf
0.45
0.50
1
82
62
'
•"
42
53
the I EPA in of
NOX 400,000
IV in of Phase I (1996 - 1999), and 1,170,000 in 2000
(the first year of Phase II compliance).
'Of the original 263 Table 1 units, are only 171 units with boilers as Group 1 (Group 2 are not
Phase II), Thus, the Phase! NOr program only 171 units. Of the 171 units, 27 units
received a Phase I NOX compliance under 40 CFR Part 72 or Part 76, 144 Table
1 units in 1996.
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 13
In 1996, EPA the of NOX for the
II, Group ! for cell burner, cyclones, wet bottom vertically-fired boilers, to as
"Group 2." go on 1,2000. The 1996
NOX reductions 890,000 by the 2000,
the NOX Title IV to a total of 2,060,000 tons
the year 2000,
I NOK
For I unit, a utility the
in 7 (a level EPA has 1 can with
technology), or may qualify for of three options which
add flexibility to the rate-based compliance
» A utility the by the
of two or more units. This approach, which can be year, allows
to at it is to
at cost,
» (AEL). A for a
if it properly and low NOX (LNBT)
to the limit, but is to EPA an
AEL is on and information about the NOX control
» I NOX Utilities with Group 1 boilers in I could qualify for two
of from the Phase I NOx (1) EPA NOX compliance
by unit) to not the
in to 40 CFR 76; and (2) EPA NOX
for the year 1996 to utilities with at which SO2 gas
SO2 Phase I Plans. Twenty for the
Of these, 25 will comply in 1997, one will 1997, and one
wiil comply in 1998.
8 on the page a of the by INOX
for 1996.
-------
1996 Compliance Report
14
8
of
• ' -" "
Standard Emission Limitation
Emissions Averaging
Alternative Emission Limitation2
SUBTOTAL
Phase I NOX Extensions for Phase I
Extension Units Installing Scrubbers
Part 76 1 NOX
TOTAL
;:;-:W«|:IJiBi8-'
46
189
4
239
24
3
266
is the option. For 1996, 22
involving 189 INOX units. in are Table 1
units; sixty are units. Of these, two involved in common stack
a For six 44 the not
to units: all the
individually. C-l a list of 1996 C-2 a
list of units with
NO,
239 Met the for in
In 1996, all to the INOX in
239 to met the one of the
In fact, at well below the
as in 9. For a list and
for see C-3. For a of EPA's
methodology for compliance INOX see C-4.
The four units identified under the Alternative Emission Limitation (AEL) option have not yet been a
final limit. In 1996 they were in compliance with a temporary limit while demonstrating their lowest
achievable NOX level. In the future, if approved for a final AEL, they will be granted a permanent limit.
-------
1996 Compliance Report
15
9
In to
_
0-10%
10% - 25%
More 25%
to StamdMtt;,./1'
:
11
19
16
"r;"
83
67
39
.; . '^PL . ' '.
_ -- "'
2
1
1
From 1990 to 1996, the population's NOX by 40 percent. As
in 10, on Table 1 and below the
I of 0.476 of the 0.50 for dry
and 0.45 for boilers).
1§
in to for the 239
NOx
(Ib/mmBtu)
o.e
Weighted Average
Emissions Limitation
(O.476)
199O
• 1 Units Q Substitution Units
-------
1996 Compliance Report
16
to
Total NOX 19903 to 1996, but not as For the 144 1
units affected in 1996 alone, NOX reductions 1990 and 1996 about 290,000
tons, or a 38 reduction. the 95 units4 with Group 1 boilers, the
to 340,000 tons. For NOX
51,000 tons, or 17.5 The lower for is
to the of these units of NOX the Table 1
for had to a (NSPS)
the I, Group 1 In in 1990, of the
below NOX by Title IV in 1996.
The graph in Exhibit 11 shows the reduction for Table 1 substitution units,
NOX reductions in 1994.
11
for the 239
NOx Tons
1,200,000
1,000,000
eoo.ooo
eoo.ooo
400,000
200,000 -
H Table 1 Units dl
NOX 33 1990 to 1996, did not as
much as the 40 in the of fuel to
electricity the by 9 for 1
The majority of the data used to calculate the baseline emission rate was short term data from relative
accuracy tests performed to certify NOX monitoring Part 75. In cases where this data was not
available, information from EPA's Air Docket No. A-95-28, utilities, the Utility Air Regulatory Group or
EPA's National Allowance Database was used.
4Phase 1NOX units subject to emission limits because the utility to participate in the SCX reduction
program by January 1, 1995.
-------
1996 Compliance
17
and 10 for in NOX
be to
SO2 NO, IN 1996
In to the of SO2 and NOX the Air Act and to
the SO2 a of the Acid is to
To
this of SO2 and NOX or
are using Continuous (CEMS) (or an
by to the
are to SO2 and NOX are
to SO2 and NOX on the
are NOX and gas (C02 or O2)
are to and to the
and
of a is the test (RATA), is
for of a CEMS and for test
the the "true" by the
to a the gas the the
the test the the All
a in to be to to the
10 for SO2 and NOX, and 15 for 1,2000, the
will be 10 As a for
a less or to 7.5 for SO2 and NOX and less or
to 10 for 1,2000, the for will
be 7.5 are a RATA in
the RATA as an it
not the the and the the
is due to or to an test is to
are not the test is
low to the and if so, a is
and to all to is no
12 the by in
1996.
12
Test
Accuracy
Median Relative Accuracy
Relative Accuracy
4.2%
3.3%
96%
-- ,-• -. •;:,". —
.
4.3%
3.5%
99%
-••'-'
33%
98%
-------
] 996 Compliance Report
Page 18
to the of a CEMS Is the of hours a
is and all and to
and an This is as the (PMA).
13 the in 1996 and the CEMS to
and NOX are and the
by the
13
1996
;:;.-: .:
S02
Flow
NOX
; 1996
99.2
993
98.9
96.6
96.9
97.1
A OF
the to NOX and to
SO2 In 1996, all 445 not met
but an of 340,000 of NOX 1990
an in and the 5
of SO2 first in 1995.
in of compliance, the 1996 results reveal one
the for controlling SO2 and NOX: the of overcompliance
in NOX for 1996 not as as the reductions for S02
In and 1996, as in 14.
14
of NO, for I
Allowable
Actual
% Over Control
SO, Tons - 1995
8,7 million tons
5.3 million tons
40%
SO, Tons - 1996
8.3 million tons
5.4 million tons
35%
Average NO,
0.476 Ibs/mmBtu
0.39 Ibs/mmBtu
18%
-------
1996 Compliance Report Page 19
of and For
the and reductions of SO2 to in a 10-25
in rainfall acidity in the Northeast in 19953, and as well.6
One factor the of the overcompliance in the SO2 program, of course, is the ability to
use in the future. The 40 of 1995 35 percent of 1996
not retired for compliance can be to cover in a year.
However, and are valuable a
The NOX on the more traditional rate-based approach, flexibility and
a lesser of overcompliance. It requires each to achieve reductions or, at a minimum, for a
group of units to achieve an average emission rate equal to or lower than their individual limits. This
approach not reductions in one year to be in year, and as a result, the
to overcomply is diluted.
The of emissions reductions over will differ the two
the 2000 both are in full SO2 are to
to the cap level of 8.95 tons, NOX emissions, in the of
an cap, are to rise as are and sources, are
not required to offset their emissions, are built and operated.
differences, both the SO2 and NOX components of the Acid Rain Program very
in 1996. The at of the is
Through the efforts of Phase I by reductions II
in 2000, the of the Acid — a 10 ton of SO2
and two ton reduction of NOX — will be achieved.
U.S. Geological Survey, Trends in Precipitation Chemistry in the United States, 1983-94 - An
Analysis of the in 1995 of Phase I of the CAAA of 1990, Title IV, USGS 96-0346,
Washington, DC, June 1996.
US EPA, from Under Title IV 1990 Clean Air Act
by Bailly, Washington, DC, December 1995.
-------
1996
A: I in 1996
The SO2
B-l : Substitution and Units in the SO2 Program
B-2: 1 Units and Units in 1996
B-3: and Utilization of Phase I Units, 1995 and 1996
B-4: Allowance of Phase I Units
Appendix B-5: Deduction: An of Underutilization and
Cap Provisions
NOX
C-l : List of Averaging Population and
C-2: I NOX Units Compliance for 1996
C-3: Compliance and Results for the 239 NOS Affected Units in 1996
C-4: Description of NOX Compliance Methodology
-------
A; I m If 96
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA Bowen
GA
GA
MB2
ID S€»2
1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
5 / /
I / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
S / /
1 / /
2 / /
BB01 /
/
/
/ /
4 / /
5 / /
6 / /
? /
1 / /
1 / /
I / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
4 / /
1 /
2 / /
3 /
4 /
MB1 / /
U
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IL
IL
IL
IL
Krift
Mcintosh
Mitchell
Scherer
Wansley
Yates
Burlington
Des Moine
George North
Milton L Kapp
Prairie Creek
Riverside
Baldwin
Coffeen
Collins
Tower
1
2
3
1
3
3
I
2
Y1BR
Y2BR
Y3BR
Y4BR
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR
1
11
1
2
4
9
j
2
3
I
2
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
-------
A: I IN 1956
SO2 NQi
IL
IL
IL
IL 9
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
1
2
5
6
IL I
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
01
02
03
04
05
06
1
2
1
2
IL 1
S MS NOi
IN 1 /
2 /
3 /
4 /
5 /
6 /"
IN 50 / /
60 / /
70 / /
IN F B
IN
IN
2SO1
IN 1
2
3
4
IN 3
4
5
6
IN City 12
IN 1
2
3
4
IN R 1
2
3
4
IN U4
IN 1
2
3
5
6
A,2
-------
A? I IN 1996
SX SO2 MOi
KS 1 /
2 /
SX SO2 NOi
KS
KY
KY
Cl
C2
C3
1
2
KY 1
2
3
KY 2
KY 1
2
KY 1
KY 5
KY 1
KY HI
H2
KY
KY
Gl
02
KY 10
MA 1
MA 1
MD C P
MD 1
2
3
4 ,
1
2
V
MD
9
II
MJ 1
2
MI J C 7
8
MI 1
2
3
MI 1
MN High 3
4
5
6
1
2
MO
MO
MO River
MO
MO
5
1
3
4
5
i
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
MO 1
2
MO 1
2
A, 3
-------
At I If 1996
ST
ST SO2
MO
MO
MO
1
2
3
1
2
I
MO
MB2
MB3
MS Jack 4
5
MS 1
2
MS 1
2
NH
NH
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NJ 1
2
I
2
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
NY Port 3
4
OH
13
14
15
16
91
92
9
10
II
12
2
3
4
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
OH 11
12
13
OH 1
2
OH
OH
OH Bay
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH JM Stuart
25
26
I
2
3
4
OH 1
2
3
4
5
S
A, 4
-------
SI SO2 NOx
OH
18
91
92
93
94
OH Miami Fort 5-1
5-2
6
7
OH River 1
2
3
4
5
OH Miles
OH Picway
OH
1
2
3
OH RE 1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
OH Toronto
9
10
11
OH 5
6
7
OH Walter CBeckjord 5
6
PA Armstrong 1
2
PA Bruce Mansfield 1
2
ST ro SQZ HQ»
PA Brunner Island 1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
PA Cheswick
PA Mitchell
PA Portland
PA Shawville
PA Sunbury
TN Allen
TN Gallatin
1
PA Conemaugh 1
2
PA Ferry 1
2
3
PA Martins Creek 1
2
3
4
33
PA New Castle 1
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
TN Cumberland 1
2
TN DuPont JVD1
Johnsonville JVD2
JVD3
JVD4
1
2
3
4
A, 5
-------
A: I IN 1996
S SQ2 MM
IN
UT
WI Ataa
WI
WI
WI
WI
!
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
B4
B5
3
4
1
Bl
1
2
WI Oak 1
2
3
4
WI Port 1
2
3
4
S
ST
WI 1 /
2 /
3 /
4 /
1 / /
2 / /
3 /
1 / /
2 / /
3 / /
1 /
2 /
1 /
2 /
3 /
1 /
2 /
3 /
1 / /
2 / /
1 /
2 /
3 /
1 /
2 /
7 /
8 /
WI
WY
WV
WV
WY
WV
WV Mt
WV
WV
WI
WI
S
6
7
8
1
2
WI S
6
7
S
WV
WY
WY
BW71
BW72
BW73
BW91
S
A, 6
-------
R-l: M THE SO2
I of the Acid Program, a not originally II to
as a or a unit to fulfill the
for one 1 by Phase I. In 1996, were 160
and 1 unit.
A I as a unit can a Table 1 unit in its
at the substitution unit
of at the Table 1 the overall would
the of the A Table 1 unit a Phase II as a
only if both are the control of the owner or operator. For 1996, 90
Table 1 160 II to be substitution units. These are in
B. 90 1 half were in the Midwest (IL, IN, MI, MO, OH, WI) and
a in the South (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS), predominantly in Georgia, as was the in
1995. In a Table 1 substitution at the
to 1995, 11 to Phase I in 1996 and 26
in the of the corresponding Table 1 units.
1 below their may a compensating unit to
to for the reduced utilization of the Table 1 unit. (A unit's
is as its over the years 1985-1987). A Table 1 unit may a
II as a if the II is in the Table 1 unit's
or has a the Table 1 unit, and the rate of the
unit has not 1985. four in 1996.
due to caps, which are in
B-5. The one unit for 1996 is New Power's Brayton Point Unit 1 in
by Ohio Edison's Unit 13. Point 1
as a in 1995, with other units at Brayton Point and an
at Harbor, New England Power plant.
B-l, 1
-------
B-2: 1
W 1996
AL EC
FL
QA
OA Hammond
GA Hammond
GA Hammond
GA Jack Mcdonoueh
GA Yates
GA Yates
GA Yates
GA Yates
EL Baldwin
IL
IL Kincaid
IL
Units
Si
6601,6602,8603
GA
GA
GA
GA
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
1BLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BLR
MB2
Y2BR
Y3BR
Y4BR
Y5BR
1,2
5
AL
Gadsden
GA Harllee Branch
GA
Harllee Branch
GA Harllee Branch
OA Arkwright
OA Arkwright
GA Arkwright_
GA Arkwright
GA
GA Kraft
GA
GA
GA Melntosh
EL
FL
GA
Crist
Scholz
Harllee Branch
4,5
1,2
1
4]
WY
IL
IL
EL
Wyodak
Havana
Wood River
Hsanepin
BW91
1,2JA5,6,?..8
1
1
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
Collins
9
Mcredosla
Hutsott¥ille
Newton
Tower
IA3A5
5
1,2,3,4,6
5,6
1^
7,8
B-2, 1
-------
B-2: 1
AND M1996
State
I IL
Vermilion
State
Name
Vermilion
Units
1
IN
Petersburg
1,2 [
lifc rw
pP"1 j JJN
H T Pritchard
5
KY
Coleman
PI ri
j MD
C P Crane
thin. I*'^5'
ipP* j Jhfc, i
R D Green
Gl,02
llh* TLf*£
R D Morrow
1,2
MD
Poii
.. -itofc ^fn
Point
4
fli)"
Morgantoi
| MI
J H Camp
u_IJ 1 <•)
[ MN
High Bridj
Tf f '
;e oj
MO
James Riv
»r ^
f MO
MO
MO
MO
Labadie
Montrose
Sioux
Sibley
1 •> 3 A
'j^p/*
1 *? *% 1
u
•>
| MO
MS
Thomas Hi
Jack Watsc
11 MR! MR*"*
me
NH
Mernmaok
NY
NY
Dunkirk
_NOTthjwri
1-4
1 1 ^
lytjrl ~~
OH
Ashtabula
7
ni4
w
fcfc» ?,ffr>
^- MIJ
hta.. Ti /FT
M
MOt
! M
tjaHnf, "ftfM
MN
fcfc h(fOi
MO
Chalk Point
Dan E Karri
J R Whiting
JH Campbell
JC Weadock
High Bridge
Sherbume County
James River
Southwest
3
1,2
13
3
7,8
3,4,5
1,2
3,4
1
Ifcfc ' MO
MO
1 j^Q
i KS
Stan. B.jfO
Meramec
Rush Island
Hawthorn
La Cygne
Siblev
1,2,3,4 i
U
5
1
1,2
hfci.. Tii iffl
fch. iijfp
Thomas Hill
Victor J Daniel
MB3J
2l
lull, TsTTT
MA
Ifc ' MV
NY
Newington
Mount Tom
Oswego
Roseton
1
4,5,6
12
Hfej,, MV
Northport
4l
fcte. flTT
OH
OH
Hit. mi
Shore
Bay Shore
1 8 ,9 1,92,93, 94 |
1,2,3.4
€\ 1 A
B-2, 2
-------
1-2: 1
IN 1996
OH
Conesi
/-VPT ! \M CJttiirt -1^-54
OH
OH
OH
OH
Edgewater 13
R B 5,6,7,8
WHSammis 5,6,7
OH
Miami
Fort - 7 •
OH
Picwa\
9
PA
H^sf
Armstrong 1
Armstr
one 2
PA
PA
Hatfiel
Martin
J- T" •»
a Creek 1^2
WI
WI
Edgew
Genoa
-* ,r j.
i
WI
Nelson
D „,,.„,, i ^ i
WI
WI
ft
V
South Oak Creek 5
wv
Albrigh
wv
wv
FortM<
Harriso
wv
Harriso
OH 11,12
OH 25,26
OH 9,10,11
PA L2
PA 1 ,2
^ ICY 2
Ifcta POT Pnatnn 1 *> "I
— |l»* [ WV Albright 1
fthhk ' 4^*
P*° PA Mai tin B Creek 3S4
Iteu. : l^r? Pj4wf^t'a#irr 1
-^ i fl™ .. ^
WI Bl
tefc^ ! nn T> i' T> ' i ^
Ifcfc,, ! ^l/T Ptillinni ^ TL *7
WI Western 1,2
— — —^- WI Port Washington 1523;4?5 I
nu
:::>::::::^
1^.. f \fi& Rrat-fn,« Prtinf 1 i
-------
B-3: AND OF i AND
State
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
OA
OA
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
ECGaston
ECGaston
EC Canton
ECGaston
ECGKton
ECGastom
ECGastoa
Big Bead
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
BigBwrf
Crist
Crist
Crist
Crist
Sdwlz
Scholz
Arkwrifjil
Arfcwriglii
Affcwriglbt
AA.wright
Atfcwright
Etowea
ID
CSCO14 {1, 2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
$
CSOCAN(1,2)
1
3
CStCBN(3,4)
3
4
5
I
2
CS001(BB01,BB02)
BB01
BB02
BB03
BB04
4
5
6
7
1
2
CS001(1,2,3,4)
I
2
3
4
1BLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BLR
(a)
Table 1
1
Table 1
I
Tutilet
I
Table I
Table 1
Table I
1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
I
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table!
I
1
Table 1
37,56?
39,400
15,532
17,036
23,170
4,278
4,043
71,421
19,71!
3,849
3,071
9,678
18,352
2,087
2,561
3,134
32,61?
39,641
42,137
4«,25«
11,21 8,752
14,777,014
12,558,560
12.545.S4S
24,231,736
13,211,865
12,384,326
15,654,771
1 1,600,402
36,743,938
3,096,772
2,922,701
31,440,408
31,053,170
27,394,634
31,933,590
5,460,857
3,045,556
13,987,547
26,191,935
939.799
1,185,473
59X.922
502,753
731,829
528,757
40,189,922
48,181,454
52,104,185
57,205,135
SO2
31,939
19,812
33,819
4.S93
5,168
76,818
19J081
2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186
34,032
36,655
46,269
40,205
12.952.1S3
12,618,216
10,114,184
!3,§5S,2<69
34,058,704
15,064,260
16,306,916
14.032,114
14,192,836
48,089,378
3,518,404
3,649,976
31,111,381
31,794,449
28,490,272
35,141,092
3,215,872
3,291,052
16,798,233
17,764,345
1,099,257
1,316,280
815,186
754,577
920,206
850,114
44,244,090
47,089,666
• 61,120,578
52,430^13
SO2
Emissions
-14.«5%
4?.7fi%
41,82%
16,29%
45.96%
14.38%
27.83%
7.56%
-3.20%
-34.71%
-16.44%
37.47%
-19.07%
31.05%
24.40%
39.95%
434%
-7.53%
9.81%
-13.09%
jggS-j»6
Utittattimi
(nmBta)
15.45%
-14.61%
-19.46%
10.44%
40.55%
14.02%
31.67%
-1057%
22.35%
30.88%
13.62%
24.88%
4.05%
2.39%
4.00%
10.04%
-41.11%
8,06%
20J9%
-32.18%
16.97%
11.03%
36.11%
50.09%
25.74%
60.78%
10.09%
-2.27%
17.30%
-8.35%
B-3. 1
-------
B-3: AND OF I 19S5 AND 1996
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
Hammond
Hammond
BaUUBMOKl
Hammond
Hammond
Harllee Branch
Harliee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harllee Branch
Harliee Branch
Jade Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Kraft
Kraft
Krai
Meifitosh
Mitchell
Wanstey
Wansiey
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yales
Yates
Yates
Yales
Yates
Burlingjon
DesMoines
George Neal North
ID
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
CS001(MBt,MB2)
MB1
MB2
Ci001(l,2,3)
1
2
3
I
3
1
2
YIBR
(Y2BR,
Y2BR
Y3BR
(Y4BR, Y5BR)
Y4BE
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR
1
11
1
Unit («)
Tufclel
Table 1
TuSblel
TnHel
Substitution
Substitution
i«Minti<»i
T*!el
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Sutatltutioii
Sufastitution
Table 1
1
1
Table 1
1
I
1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
1
SO2
7,398
14,297
27,430
54,029
19.5S6
3,944
6,611
3,570
26,797
27,004
118
4,054
3.S79
6,535
5,683
9,020
9
4,615,977
2,407,951
2,687,402
18,893,171
13,369,411
16,458,59?
29,080,722
31,152,770
13,691,408
16,567,755
1,073,163
974,178
1,981,050
6,058,2«6
3,821,605
39,368,026
40,298,273
3,253,721
2,701,265
2,129,655
2,143,461
2,640,857
9,589,905
8,868,859
8,S18,»6
0
9,246,893
1996
SO2
liiissi0BS
7,246
143*4
26,616
39,409
18,544
4,65S
5,713
4,129
33,612
37,059
103
4,869
5,211
7,139
6,786
6,309
0
3.7S2
Utilization
--JssjMsL—,
3,515,633
2,751,274
3,572.759
19,191,000
14,3«0,3I3
14,456,249
19,090,017
25.2CT.00f
14,011,717
13,696390
1,626,008
1,220,370
2,376,381
6,698,41!
3,956,533
40,§44,610
44,775,798
2,858,072
3,418,865
3,189,297
3,775,583
3,086,657
11,140,080
10,667,714
9,611,935
0
9,453,477
SO2
Emissions
-2.05%
0.47%
-Z97%
-27,06%
-5.32%
IS, 10%
-13,58%
15.66%
25.43%
37.24%
-12.71%
20.10%
34.34%
9.24%
19.41%
-30.06%
0.00%
-0.79%
Utilization
{mmBtu}
-23.84%
14.26%
32.94%
1,51%
7.41%
-12.17%
-34.36%
-18.89%
2.34%
-17.33%
51.52%
25.27%
19.96%
10,57%
3.53%
3.75%
11.11%
•12.16%
26.57%
49.76%
76.14%
16.88%
16.16%
20.28%
8.99%
0.00%
2.23%
-------
B-3: AND OF 1 AND
IA
IA
IA
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
L.
BaUwin
BalAwn
Coffeen
Coffeen
CoSem
Collins
CoUim
Collins
Collins
Collins
Collins
Coliins
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Havana
Havana
Itoraaa
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Hennepin
Hennepio
Hntsonville
Hutsonville
ID
2
4
5
1
1
3
CS0001(1,2)
1
2
€81230(1,2,3)
1
2
3
(4, 5)
4
5
1
I
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
1
2
5
6
TJJK (a)
Tahiel
I
Tahiel
1
I
1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
1
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
?«450
31,228
375
2,708
1,043
1,017
6,950
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,215
27,560
4,455
3,355
11,498,280
8,711,126
4,381,65$
2S,3«»136
39,231,680
32,553,530
9,9IO,S49
12,406,868
9,562,665
S.382,516
4,067,958
3308,955
445,074
447,459
3,000,220
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,115,547
11,110,630
2,158,806
1,609,690
SO2
5,989
2,744
2,2S5
92,492
75,793
105,553
43,755
1,237
1,704
3,271
2,686
13,596
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
11,236,532
8,290,105
5,487,073
35,993,704
29,324,128
40,432,952
16,654,324
31,814,222
6,755310
6,510,067
9,007,079
6,090,653
3,233,683
1,402,802
1,190,947
5,945,488
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,514,131
15,675,990
4,959,359
3,814,018
SO2
Emissions
-19.6!%
-41.02%
25.09%
23,25%
-27.24%
21.62%
40.11%
229.87%
-37.0S%
213.61%
164.11%
95.63%
fl.00%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
e.oo%
0.00%
0.00%
-15.42%
44.56%
141.80%
154.22%
^nunBta}
-2.28%
-5.48%
25,23%
24.20%
68.04%
12.15%
-45.55%
-31.92%
7.45%
49.72%
-2.27%
215.18%
166.16%
98.17%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
-14.61%
41,09%
129.73%
136.94%
IL
Joiet9
SBbstihiti«!
3,274
13,664,473
1,967
7,665,686
-39.92%
-43.90%
B-3, 3
-------
B-3: AND OF i 1995 AND 1996
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
EN
IN
IN
IN
EN
joppt Steam
Joppm Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa
Kincaid
KincaM
Kincaid
Merecfosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Newlwi
Newton
Vermilion
Vermilion
Vermilion
Wood River
Baitly
BaiUy
Baiily
Breed
Cayuga
Cayuga
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Creek
Cliiy
ID
€S1(I,2)
I
2
CS2(3,4)
3
4
CS3 (5, €)
5
6
(I, 2)
I
2
CS0001(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
2
CS3 (1, 2)
1
2
1
XS12 (7, 1}
7
g
1
1
2
CSOQ1(1,2,3)
1
2
3
(a)
TMilei
TaMel
T*lel
Table 1
Tablo 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
1
Substitution
1
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1
I
1
1
S€»2
8,090
7j692
12, 166
11,170
4,022
19,610
63
11,221
12,25t
2,623
0
6,246
0
44,666
46,504
47,634
14,S37,967
15,478,622
14,490,731
14,707,065
13,848,945
16,605,286
10,956,972
17,559,881
474,083
457,564
425,038
311,152
10,666,246
219,206
36,812,602
27,313,916
977,411
1,817,754
0
12,771,576
21,796,237
0
30,209,082
33,199,670
16,650,268
16,005,819
15,832,010
SO2
8,572
i,07I
20,051
6,672
15,943
112
11,148
15,404
579
0
3,835
0
38,676
32,134
50,661
14,960,182
I5,%9,238
15,215,573
13,102,754
15,574,434
14,937,071
20,133,483
21,671,782
1,044,625
708,893
664,115
903,356
11,667,552
373,709
27,174,200
32,173,480
358,330
743,988
0
12,840,429
18,413,238
0
31,117,238
24,405,552
16,465,964
15,821,604
16,401,939
SO2
Emissions
5,9fi%
4.93%
-2S.»5%
79,51%
65,89%
-18.70%
77.78%
-0.65%
25.66%
-77.93%
0.00%
-38.60%
0.00%
-13.41%
-30.90%
6.35%
J99SJ996_
UtilkatfoB
(mraBta)
0.82%
3.17%
5.00%
-10.91%
12.46%
-10.05%
83.75%
23.42%
120.35%
54.93%
56.25%
76.73%
9.39%
70.48%
-26.18%
17.79%
-63.34%
-59.07%
0.00%
0.54%
-15.52%
0.00%
3.01%
-26.49%
-1.11%
-1.15%
3,60%
B-3, 4
-------
B-3: El
AND OF I MSO
State
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
Cti%Cresk
Ciifty Creek
W
W Stoat
Elmer W Stout
FBCuUey
F B Culley
FBCulley
Frank E Rate
Frank E Rate
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
11 1 fritchard
H T
H T Pritchard
xMichigan Cily
Petersburg
Petersburg
R Gallagfier
R Gallagher
R Oaf lazier
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
Tanners Creek
Wabasli River
River
Ri¥«r
River
ID
C10§2(4,5,6)
4
5
6
50
60
TO
(2, 3)
2
3
ISGl
2SO1
(1, 2}
1
2
3
4
(5, 6)
5
6
12
1
2
(1,2)
I
2
(3, 4)
3
4
U4
1
(2, 3, 5, 6)
2
3
(a)
TaMel
1
1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
1
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Table I
1
Table 1
1
1
1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
TaMel
Table 1
SO2
43,870
5,282
6,151
27,424
2,549
10,038
10,604
99,980
60,912
3,783
5,932
12,261
21,305
41,336
25,393
26,23?
29,318
197
2S.211
15,290,483
14748,991
15,945,886
4,089,451
4,830,084
21,935,232
5,447,464
19,155,053
8,434,296
9,072,148
45,987,068
42,943,632
44,354,520
35,663,082
1,310,910
4,434,954
28,031,314
13,400,952
27,389.587
8,580,819
8,017,569
8,244,314
10,139,139
22,957,388
900,120
2,791,626
3,065,847
53,668
6,045
5,466
26,764
4,800
5,284
8,066
91,346
35,273
8,993
7,068
14,841
10,473
16,002
21,609
28,826
59,876
4,19?
38,986
16,332,747
1S.07S.609
16,547,688
5,588,803
4,806,792
24,589,32$
5,328,808
20,119,291
4,590,729
7,114,275
37,712,577
41,393,737
30,798,399
37,063,085
1,463,618
5,275,111
30,794,272
17,644,936
32.737.94S
6,645,958
8,185,232
1 1,064,458
9,937,363
30,441,214
5,111,474
4,532,020
4,199,125
SO2
Emissions
22,33%
14.45%
-11.14%
-2.41%
88.31%
-47.36%
-23.93%
-8.44%
-42.09%
137.72%
19.15%
21.04%
-50 «<*»
-6L31%
-14.90%
9,87%
104.23%
2030.46%
38.19%
Iftiliiaflan
6.82%
7.94%
3.77%
36.66%
•4.48%
12.10%
-2,18%
5.03%
-45.57%
-21.51%
-17.99%
-3.61%
-30.56%
3.93%
11.65%
18.94%
9.86%
31.67%
19.53%
-22.55%
2.09%
34.21%
-1.99%
32.60%
467.87%
62.34%
36.96%
B-3, 5
-------
8-3: AND OF 1 1S95 AND 1996
State
IN
IN
IN
IN
M
IN
IN
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
River
Watrick
Waniek
L»Cygne
Qutndaro
Coletman
Colsman
Coleaaij
Cooper
Cooper
E W Brawn
EW Brown
EW Brown
EW Brown
East Bend
Elmer Smilh
Elmer Smith
Etmer
Green B¥er
H L
Hmp&L 2
2
Paradise
EDOreen
m
5
6
XS 123 (1,2, 3)
3
1
2
4
1
2
Cl
C2
C3
CS1(1,2)
1
2
1
(2, 3)
2
3
2
XS12(1,2)
1
2
1
5
1
HI
H2
3
-------
B-3:
KY
KY
MA
MA
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MI
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
RDGreea
Shawnee
Btaytoo Point
Mount Tom
CP Crane
CP Crane
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Morgsntown
Morgantown
R P Smith
RP Smith
DaaERarn
Dan E Kara
JCWeadock
JCWeadock
JCWeadock
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JR Whiting
JR Whiting
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
High Bridge
n>
G2
W
1
1
1
2
CSE12(I,2)
1
2
3
4
1
2
9
11
1
2
CS0009 (7, 8)
7
8
CSOQ09 (1, 2)
1
2
3
1
3
CSOQ01(3,4,5,6)
3
4
5
6
Unit (s)
Substitution
Table 1
Compensating
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Tabi« 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
SO2
1,689
2,953
11,739
8,223
6,138
6,024
41,087
3,010
1,354
28,040
38,515
118
1,536
7,272
11,137
11,789
13,171
27,198
4,244
4,807
3,040
14,243,216
10,752,771
17,047,825
9,923,946
10,403,533
9,920,042
17,440,446
20,961,601
6,119,037
10,668,616
27,858,112
37,190,575
170,583
2,125,734
12,444,982
18,168,756
10,947,084
9,862,172
16,333,282
4,809,230
52,821,444
6,684,072
7,936,734
1,203,949
2,203,745
4,590,541
7,723,726
SO2
2,314
2,3»
9,045
L7,314
15,581
13,163
37,211
2,67S
1,354
37,236
35,542
78
2,069
9,765
9,506
10,792
22,771
22,141
3,538
4,236
3,768
16,982,755
9,307,313
17^80,816
9,908,995
12,760,058
10,904,815
19,675,719
16,341,786
4,153,249
6,556,094
37,010,782
35,650,179
107,596
2,833,072
16,478,448
15,850,441
8,551,701
9,538,250
15,942,587
20,946,592
47,025,128
5,488,183
6,515,893
1,397,090
1,915,234
5,087,413
9,292,112
Percent
SO2
Emissions
37.00%
-18.76%
-22.95%
-11.05%
153,14%
118.51%
-9.43%
-11.03%
0.00%
32.80%
-7.72%
-33.90%
34.70%
34.28%
-14.64%
-8.46%
72.89%
-18.59%
-16.64%
-11.88%
23.95%
Utilization
(mmBta)
19.23%
-13.44%
1.95%
-0.15%
22.65%
9.93%
12.82%
-22.04%
-32.13%
-38.55%
32.85%
-4.14%
-36.92%
33.28%
32.41%
-12.76%
-21.88%
-3.28%
-2.39%
335.55%
-10.97%
-17.89%
-17.90%
16.04%
-13.09%
10.82%
20.31%
B-3, 7
-------
B-3:
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
County
CwnBy
County
Asbuiy
Hawthorn
River
James River
James liver
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Meramec
Mewniee
Meramec
M«amec
Montasse
Moalrose
Mootrose
Montrose
Mew Madrid
Mew Madrid
Rush Island
RIB A Island
Sibtey
Sibtey
Sibley
Sibley
Sioux
Sioux
Southwest
Thomas Hill
ID
€S!(!,2)
1
2
1
5
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
I
2
3
4
1
CS023(2,3)
2
3
I
2
1
2
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
1
2
1
MB1
(a)
Substitution
Ttbtel
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Sutetitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
1
SO2
9,463
8,112
5,634
744
966
2,054
23,321
23,236
38,025
44,223
1,852
1,209
4,702
5,161
2,31?
5,644
8,82?
7,926
21,412
22,209
12,214
27,477
20,379
2,144
2,817
B-3, 8
46,196,144
47,197,300
13,925,197
2 3 14,728
3,675,945
6,161,194
32,420,157
36,144,760
35,134,368
40,613,571
2,966,463
1,938,813
6,008,665
5.918,092
8,891,517
10,710,072
11,390,992
37,073,840
39,093,068
39,390,852
32,955,086
3,275,126
3,201,052
21,806,789
20,429,379
16,935,316
9,023,810
13,435,098
11,681
6,899
51,536
36,790
3,344
3.522
5,682
4,678
2.S77
5,431
8,855
8,007
13,225
14,044
17,893
22,358
34,038
3,066
2,934
5i,3i9,9S2
51,477,248
11,502^68
26,458,409
2,206,094
3,885,157
7,562,737
37,988,343
20,875,392
42,373,060
31,934,417
3,684,584
4,040,199
6,226,032
5,282,678
11,154,264
10,700,341
9,451,260
37,130,588
38,456,072
37,060,«98
39,943,130
3,323,704
3,278,399
25,052,823
16,705,724
26,575,398
1 1,742,780
13,624,236
SOI
Emissions
4t,24%
216,94%
404.55%
314,46%
-49.91%
-70,31%
. 35.53%
-16.81%
80.56%
191,32%
20.84%
-9.36%
24.17%
-3.77%
0.32%
1.02%
-3S.24%
-36,76%
46.50%
-18.63%
67.02%
43.00%
4.15%
1995-1996
UtiMatian
(•nBtn)
11.24%
9.07%
-17,40%
15.71%
-4.69%
5.69%
22.75%
17.18%
-42.25%
20.60%
-21.37%
24.21%
108.39%
3.62%
-10.74%
25.45%
-17.03%
0.15%
-1.63%
-5.92%
21.20%
1.48%
2.42%
14.89%
-18.23%
56.92%
30.13%
1.41%
-------
B-3:
MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NH
NH
NH
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
Thomas Hill
Hill
Jack Watson
Jack Watson
RD Morrow
R D Morrow
Victor J Daniel Jr
Menrimack
Menimack
Newingten
BL England
BL England
Dunkifk
Dunkirk
Dunkirk
GreenMge
Mitliken
Miiliken
Mitliken
Norfhport
Northport
Norfhporf
Oswego
Oswego
Oswego
Port Jefferson
Port JeffeisoB
Roseton
Rosetoa
ID
MB2
MB3
4
5
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
CS0003(3»4)
3
4
6
I
1
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
3
4
1
2
SO2
Type («)
1
Substitution
1
i
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Table I
1
1
1
Table 1
Table I
1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
3,749
10,404
18,577
38,044
2,914
3,618
10,168
10,450
25,678
11,155
18,101
3,619
34,621
9,824
9,376
4,114
2,228
4,047
538
0
0
837
3,640
2,636
1,607
2,381
17,244,380
49,236,656
11,344,947
23,456,288
9,255,066
10,149,701
28,195,408
8,230,447
22,133,654
16,127,739
8,141,332
10.819,425
10,143,622
12,425,425
7,184,237
12,731,349
10.409,978
7,303,890
17,624,404
7,703,107
23,759,787
0
0
4,261,424
6,598,425
4,722,844
7,175,269
10,692,101
12
SO2
Emissions
4,685
9,798
19,627
43,588
4,847
3,749
9,476
10,606
24,037
9,291
18,368
1,752
31,867
7,144
4,471
3,414
4,«4»
1^14
0
0
772
2.S35
4,499
2,903
4,021
m.
(mmBtu)
22,154,212
45,296,444
14,560,545
32,937,887
15,620,857
12,152,295
26,055,044
7,621,232
19,712,188
11,114,684
9,042^02
11,703,690
10,792,923
10,116,478
5,512,986
10,937,583
11,668,817
11,054,751
17,346,236
8,524,632
16,800,166
0
0
3,242,998
5,475,689
8,003,758
6,148,402
7,670,038
S€>2
EmusioDS
24.97%
-5.82%
5.65%
14.57%
66.33%
3.62%
-6.81%
1.49%
-6.39%
-16.71%
2.58%
-51.59%
-7.95%
-27.28%
-32.31%
47.30%
56.37%
14.88%
157.25%
0.00%
0.00%
-7.77%
-22.12%
70.68%
80.65%
68.8S%
UtiitatioB
J(inmBta)
28.47%
-8.00%
28.34%
40.42%
68.71%
19,73%
-7.59%
-7.40%
•10.94%
-31.08%
11.07%
8.17%
6.40%
-18Jt%
-23,26%
-13.93%
12.09%
51.35%
-1.58%
10.66%
-29.29%
0.00%
0.00%
-23.90%
-17.02%
69.47%
-14.31%
-28.26%
B-3, 9
-------
B-3: AND OF i AND
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Acme
Acme
Aone
Acme
Acme
Acme
Ashtabula
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Avon Lake
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Cardinal
Cardinal
Conesville
Conesville
Conesville
Conesvilie
Conesvilie
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Eastiake
Edgewater
Edgewater
Edgewater
Gen J M Gavin
Gen J M Gavin
Gorge
Gorge
n»
13
14
15
16
91
92
7
9
10
11
n
CSS {1,2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
1
1
CS012(1,2)
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
11
12
13
1
2
25
26
SO2
Unit Type (•)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,183
2,594
3,309
0
21,921
25,051
83,160
22,146
19,753
8,125
62,940
8,635
13,025
14,451
23,405
57,855
0
0
10
11,945
11,533
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,511,963
2,236,810
4,989,579
0
32,497,742
7,651,417
7,419,431
7,676,340
9,735,000
33,575,480
39,902,156
3,180,516
6,148,562
4,371,286
29,868,708
4,959,011
7,087,542
8,096,208
12,634,666
26,915,088
0
0
1,649,050
86,515,632
68,002,336
0
0
1996
SO2
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863
25,025
76,138
28,212
25,264
12,794
58,778
13,095
13,779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4
28,370
40,672
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,131,030
1,685,434
5,121,816
0
34,561,596
7,693,884
6,622,437
7,582,696
10,498,676
29,017,768
26,408,584
5,267,264
5,867,919
5,872,821
27,390,004
6,729,324
7,530,250
5,833,256
11,184,656
31,917,980
0
0
169,446
85,368,952
100,099,832
0
0
Ckanj
S02
Emissions
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0,00%
0.00%
130.49%
-52.54%
10.85%
0.00%
27.11%
•4.10%
-8.44%
27.39%
27.90%
57.46%
-6.61%
51.65%
5.79%
-26.66%
-3.70%
4.95%
0.00%
0.00%
-60.00%
137.51%
252.66%
0.00%
0.00%
ee.
Utilization
___£nimBtii)
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
120.09%
-24.65%
2.65%
0.00%
6.35%
0.56%
-10.74%
-1.22%
7.84%
-13.57%
-33.82%
65.61%
-4.56%
34.35%
•8.30%
35.70%
6.25%
-27.95%
-11.48%
18.59%
0.00%
0.00%
-89.72%
-1.33%
47.20%
0.00%
0.00%
B-3, 10
-------
B-3: AND OF 1 AND
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
JMStaarf
JMSteart
JMStuart
JMStoart
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Like Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Muskinguni River
Muskitigum River
Muskingum River
Muskinguni River
Muskingum River
Muskingum River
Niles
Miles
Picway
Postal
Poston
Poston
R E Burger
RE Burger
REBiirger
R E Burger
ID
I
2
3
4
€8001(1,2,3,4,5)
I
2
3
4
5
18
91
92
93
94
CSQ56(S-l,5-2,6)
5-1
5-2
6
7
€8014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
9
1
2
3
CS0001 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
I
2
3
Unit (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
12
SO2
Emissions
22,861
31,903
25,034
27,841
92,806
0
0
0
0
0
4,193
21,301
102,908
14,648
13,080
12,340
4,722
0
0
0
41,658
25
Utilization
(mmBtu)
32,762,470
44,629,995
34,990,744
38,786,248
13,812,450
15,%2,478
16,634,018
IS,557,%2
16,166,596
0
0
0
0
0
196,579
196,579
4,580,562
28,213,054
5,416,381
7,060,761
7,503,635
8,997,649
27,541,864
6,798,223
5,531,406
1,792,457
0
0
0
308,726
263,393
226,002
12
SO2
Emissions
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226
123,599
1,433
0
0
0
0
14,421
38,985
160,368
20,223
7,110
15,375
15,071
0
0
0
62,557
96
Utilization
_[minBtu)_
32,856,554
39,776,416
36,913,980
31,602,492
15,541,682
15,701,555
15,148,702
14,375,389
16,381,780
2,396,829
0
0
0
0
516,801
516,801
12,392,706
38,049,581
9,743,860
10,890,512
11,872,478
11,380,074
36,993,688
7,986,488
5,619,661
5,014,683
0
0
0
0
0
0
SO2
Emissions
0,21%
42.06%
3.69%
-20.17%
33.18%
NA
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
243.93%
83.02%
55.84%
38.06%
-45.64%
24.59%
219.17%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
50.17%
Utilization
(mmBtu)
0.29%
-10.88%
5.50%
-18.52%
-1.71%
•1.63%
-8.93%
-7.60%
1.33%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
162.90%
162.90%
170.55%
34.87%
79.90%
54.24%
58.22%
26.48%
34.32%
17.48%
1.60%
179.77%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
-100.00%
-100.00%
-100.00%
B-3, 11
-------
B-3: AND OF 1 1995 AND 1996
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
FA
PA
FA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
FA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
RE Burger
R E Burger
RE Burger
R E
RE Burger
Toroirto
Toronto
Toronto
WHSanunis
WHSammis
W H Sammis
Walter C Beekjord
Waiter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brenner Island
Brunner Island
Btunaer Hand
Brutmer Island
Cheswick
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Fenry
HstfieW s Ferry
HatfiekTs Ferry
Haifiehfs Ferry
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
ID
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
H
5
6
7
5
6
1
2
I
1
CS102(1,2)
1
2
3
1
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
CS 102 (1,2)
1
2
3
4
(a)
Substitution
Table!
1
Table 1
1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
1
Table I
1
1
1
1
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
0
0
0
12,62?
27,041
22,162
8,34?
17,479
4,711
17,196
7,388
5,532
41,061
56,335
42,900
4,729
73364
164,841
10,762
3,045
3,435
92,323
491,027
491,368
6,031,625
10,268,509
0
0
0
20,924,484
44,119,407
33,827,070
9,616,651
21,792,036
3,503,406
13,270,697
47,151,736
34,343,992
18,577,384
17,525,951
49,753,884
35,130,348
72,404,491
52,129,065
39,196,629
28,031,200
29,440,740
5,495,084
4,380,845
6,673,213
7,686,067
SO2
0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
22,761
40,041
16,496
15,654
5,831
8,159
47,771
44,832
39,980
3376
3,732
153,413
24,601
2,442
3,016
0
342,333
345,590
12,351,365
1«,05S,S14
0
i
0
17,229,437
40,507,621
39,173,092
15,965,398
27,366,092
11,760,419
10,843,803
39,049,744
51,758,064
19,038,246
21,075,806
39,299,942
32,374,384
56,341,839
60,156,610
32,091,132
33,885,414
27,107,067
10,422,634
7,831,516
5,348,032
8,813,199
SO2
Emissions
0,00%
0.00%
0.00%
-3.01%
12.58%
26.19%
172.68%
129.08%
250.16%
-8.97%
-21.07%
47,49%
16.34%
-20.42%
-6.81%
-28.61%
-94.91%
-6.93%
128.59%
-19.80%
-12.71%
Utiliatioii
(mmBta)
-100.00%
-».2S%
-29,67%
104,89%
'1.03%
-17,66%
4,19%
15.80%
66,02%
25.58%
235.69%
-18.29%
-17.18%
50.70%
2.48%
20.25%
-21.01%
-7.84%
-22.18%
15.40%
-18.13%
20.88%
-7.93%
89.67%
78.77%
-19.86%
14.66%
B-3, 12
-------
B-3: AND OF 1 199S AND 1996
State
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
Mitchell
Newcastle
Newcastle
Portland
Portland
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Sunbury
Sunbury
Allen
Allen
Allen
Cumberland
Cumberland
DuPont JohnsonvilSe
DaPont Johnsonville
DuPont Johnsonville
DuPont JohnsonviHe
Gallatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
GaMatin
Gallatin
Gallatin
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
JohnsonviHe
JohnsonviHe
Johnsonville
m
33
1
2
1
2
1
2
CS1(3,4)
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
JVD1
JVD2
JVD3
JVD4
CSGA12 (1, 2)
1
2
CSGA34(3,4)
3
4
CSJO10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Unit Type (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution.
Tablet
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Opt-In
Opt-In
Opt-In
Opt-In
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
S02
835
0
0
11,088
11,055
14,265
10,837
33,302
9,847
9,511
13,144
16,512
18,618
12,445
13,685
0
0
0
0
47,243
51,122
114,677
13,990,360
0
0
7,308,370
7,470,403
9,567,429
6,931,655
12,104,776
11,393,059
8,181,105
8,087,213
14,735,570
15,702,330
15,721,586
125,433,200
120,376,016
15,506,107
14,797,124
16,469,892
14,950,402
6,322,332
6,033,143
5,555,598
6,407,192
7,955,222
6,882,233
10,264,280
19
SO2
Emissions
728
0
0
11,963
13,820
10,587
13,474
29,884
9,511
10,939
5,434
6,503
8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0
55,363
61,303
126,367
96
Utilization
(mmBta)
9,346,753
0
0
8,004,960
9,654,232
7,071,835
8,841,290
12,231,908
9,337,793
7,316,803
8,495,968
13,232,597
15,751,898
13,330,030
88,223,6%
121,294,176
0
0
0
0
14,169,010
15,977,846
15,888,894
18,810,130
8,771,161
8,608,948
9,183,864
8,805,822
5,801,129
8,424,067
10,200,693
1995-19% .
SO2
-12.81%
0.00%
0.00%
7.89%
25.01%
-25.78%
24.33%
-10.26%
-3.41%
15.01%
-58.66%
-60.62%
-54.91%
-23.47%
-3.16%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
17.19%
19.92%
10.19%
-33.19%
0.00%
0.00%
9.53%
29.23%
-26.08%
27.55%
1.05%
-18.04%
-10.56%
5.05%
-10.20%
0.32%
-15.21%
-29.66%
0.76%
NA
NA
NA
NA
-8.62%
7.98%
-3.53%
25.82%
38.73%
42.69%
65.31%
37.44%
-27.08%
22.40%
-0.62%
B-3, 13
-------
B-3:
State
TN
TO
TO
W!
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W!
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W!
WI
WI
Plant
JotasonvilJe
Jotasoovffle
Jotasottville
Alma
Ataw
Alna
JFMadgett
Nelson Devey
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
North Oak Cwek
North Oak Creek
North Oak Creek
North Oak Creek
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pulliam
Pulliam
PulHam
PuUbun
Puliiam
Rock River
Rock River
Scyth O*k Creek
South Oak Creek
Oitk Creek
ID
S
9
10
CSI (84, B5)
m
BS
3
4
1
Bl
CSI (1,2)
1
2
1
2
3
4
CS7(1,2.3)
1
2
3
4
5
€856(5,6)
5
6
7
8
1
2
5
6
UBitTfpe(t)
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
SvMtutMn
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Table 1
T»Mel
Table 1
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
lubjtituti
-------
B-3: AND OF I 1995 AND 1996
State
W!
WI
Wl
WI
WI
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
WY
WY
WY
South Oak Creek
Western
Weston
Albright
Albright
Albright
Fort
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Kammer
KanuHer
Kammer
Kammer
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Mt
Mt Storm
Rives vilie
Rivesvilie
Willow
Jim Bridgsr
Jim Bridger
Jim
ID
7
8
I "
2
1
2
3
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
CS013(I,2,3)
1
2
3
CS012(t,2)
1
2
CSO(1,2)
1
2
3
7
8
2
BW71
BW72
JBW73
Unit (a)
TaMei
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Sobsttation
Substitution
I
Table 1
1
1
I
1
1
I
TaWel
Table I
Table I
1
1
T«btel
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
1221
SO2
15,663
969
1,936
2,386
2,358
11,444
26,803
43,171
9,944
122,193
61,623
95,244
2,549
418
1,357
7,908
7,919
6,760
7,794
20,300,114
12,620,790
3,302,695
6,891,829
1.931J26
1,915,246
8,920,319
21,629,768
33,891,670
46,581,148
47,280,205
45.540,215
12.853.671
14,982,618
15.522,353
35,522,720
47,106,040
36.081,280
39,353,660
38,955,084
620,003
1,686,555
7,872,392
53,237,281
44,157,743
51,064,868
SOI
20,718
1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
37,468
16,469
1
53,152
107,211
5,096
233
1,037
6,739
6,272
7,165
6,180
18,264,6S6
18,247,312
3,536,812
6,367,751
1,190,327
1,675,656
7,663,974
26,435,504
29,454,119
50,422,229
49,485,012
46,729,368
15,233,808
12,862,993
14,005,666
47,955,776
34,334,844
40,588,560
43397,872
28,675,658
287,932
1,232,614
7,224,854
41,591,229
47,105,263
40,956,546
SO2
Emissions
32.27%
14.14%
4.39%
-39.27%
-16.79%
-19.21%
25.67%
-13.21%
65.62%
-2.31%
43.75%
12.56%
99.92%
-52.25%
-23.58%
-14.78%
-20.80%
5.99%
-20.71%
UtiifeatfeM
(mnBtu)
-10.03%
44,59%
-4.70%
-38.38%
-12.51%
-14.08%
22.22%
-13.09%
8.25%
4,«%
Mt%
18.52%
-14.15%
-9.77%
35.00%
-27.11%
12.49%
10.28%
-26.39%
-53.56%
-26.92%
-8.23%
-21.88%
6.67%
-19.10%
WY
(a) Ifce unit as in
Substitution
S.2S1
34,062,900
10,012
40,346,052
20.90%
1, or as a or
B-3, 15
!8.4S%
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
At
AL
AL
AL
AL
PL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
QA
GA
QA
Plant Name
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
ECGaston
ECGnston
ECGaston
ECOastan
E C Getan
ECGaston
E CGsiton
Gadsden
Gadsden
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Big Bend
Crist
Cnsl
Crist
Crist
Scholz
Scholz
Arkwright
Arkwight
Arfcwnght
Arkwright
Arkwright
BOWCE*
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Hammond
Harflee Branch
Harllee Blanch
Harflee Branch
ID
CSC014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
CSOCAH(1,2)
1
2
CSOCBN(3,4)
3
4
5
1
2
CS001(BBO),BB02)
BB01
BB02
XS23 (BB03,
BB03
BB04
4
5
6
7
I
2
(1, 1, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
IBLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BIR
CS001 (1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
4
CSOOi(],2)
1
2
limit Type (a)
Table 1
Tablet
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
fable 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Tibiel
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table I
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Tablet
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
SOI
Einlsifctiis
37,507
39,400
15,532
17,036
23,170
4,278
4,043
71,421
19,711
3,849
3,071
9.678
18,352
2,0X7
2,561
3,134
32,617
39,641
42,137
46,258
7,398
14,297
27,430
mm
31,939
5S.21S
22,028
19,812
33,819
4,893
5,168
76,818
19,081
2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186
4,386
34,032
36.655
46,269
40,205
7,246
14,364
26.616
Aflommccs
(c)
13,213
14,907
14,995
15,005
45,923
17,624
11,052
17,828
18,773
58,265
5,158
5,374
27,662
26,387
26,036
6.400
9,953
9,374
18,695
50,703
8,282
8,572
Z437
2,240
3,944
3,159
54,838
53.329
69,862
69,852
8,549
8,977
8,676
36,650
19,221
21,735
HeUin
18,192
18,968
20,772
20,801
70,408
13,231
14,519
1 1,871
16,295
39,761
6,038
6,705
41,114
41,063
14,986
8,85S
16.057
15,677
27,712
51,395
14,477
14,583
4.090
3,697
7,105
5,334
48.838
48,795
63.866
59,725
14,632
15,488
14,886
51,003
24,727
31,755
A10w«icea
for
(i)
8,390
8,221
6,371
8,957
58,218
10,578
11,450
9,850
9,962
33,819
4,893
5,168
38,409
38,409
14,311
4,770
2,513
2,566
13,304
14,853
2,735
3,186
1,096
1,097
1,096
1,097
34,032
36,655
46,269
40,205
2,415
2,415
2,416
14.364
13,308
13,308
I
(e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ABomnces
Over
to 1ff7
9,802
10,747
14,401
11,144
12,190
2,653
3,139
2,021
6,333
5,942
1,145
1,537
2,705
2,654
675
4,088
13,544
13,111
14,408
36,542
11,742
11,397
2,994
2,600
6,009
4,437
14,806
12,140
17,597
19,520
12,217
13,073
12,470
36,639
11,419
11,447
B-4,1
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
OA
GA
OA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
1L
tt.
tt.
IL
n.
TL
tt,
IL
IL
PbntNane
Harllee Bfaneb.
Harllee Branck
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Medonough
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Meintosh
Mitchell
Wansley
Wansley
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yaws
Yates
Yates
Yates
Burlington
Des Moines
George Heal North
Milton L Kapp
Prairie Creek
Riverside
Baldwin
Baldwin
Baldwin
Cofifeen
Coffeen
Coffeen
Collins
Collins
Collins
(3, 4)
3
4
CS001
MB1
MB2
(1, 2, 3)
1
2
3
1
3
1
2
Y1BR
Y2BE
Y3BE
CS002(Y4BE,YSBR)
Y
-------
B-4: AND OF I
State
IL
IL
IL
IL
n.
JL
JL
IL
TL
JL
JL
JL
TL
IL
IL
TL
tt.
E.
H,
E,
IL
E,
E.
E,
tt.
E,
IL
tt,
IL
tt.
E.
tt.
n.
n.
!
TL
IL
IL
IL
JL
TL
JL
IL
Plant Name
Collins
Collins
Collins
Collins
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Havana
Hennepin
Hennepin
Hutsonville
Hiitsonville
Joliet 9
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Kincaid
Kincaid
Kincaid
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosia
Meredosis
Meredosis
Meredosis
Meredosia
Newton
Newton
Vermilion
Vermilion
ID
3
CS(M05(4,5)
4
5
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
5
6
$
CS1 (1, 2)
1
2
CS2(3,4)
3
4
CS3 (5, 6)
5
6
CS0102(1,2)
1
2
CS0001 (1, 2, 3, 4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
CS3 (1, 2)
1
Unit Type (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
EnntaiMn
1995 (ft)
2,708
1,043
1,01?
6,950
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,215
27,560
4,455
3,355
3,274
8.090
7,692
12,166
11,170
4,022
19,610
63
11,221
12,258
2,623
ma
Enilssfcms
1,704
3,271
2,686
13,5%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
1,967
8,572
8,071
8,644
20,051
6,672
15,943
112
11,148
15,404
579
Allwwuiees
(c)
1,»S6
1,555
1,722
1,068
1,015
6,479
34
43
34
34
34
34
34
34
10,012
20,182
9,661
9,837
5,595
12,259
10,487
11,947
11,061
11,119
10,341
34,564
37,063
1,245
1,355
1,173
1,078
15,227
44
14,599
6,346
12,972
Held fat
Uittt
as of 1/30/97
3,636
1,555
1,722
3,393
2,863
14,289
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,774
41,099
10,867
8,719
5,595
20,473
16,929
20,048
18,276
16,155
14,599
62,043
68,541
2,155
1,731
1,407
1,887
16,044
175
11,477
15,853
317
Deducted for
(<§
412
152
852
3,27!
2,686
13,596
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,794
39,842
10,772
8,529
1,967
4,286
4,286
4,035
4,036
4,322
4,322
10,025
10,026
2,090
1,426
1,334
1,822
15,943
112
11,148
15,404
160
Deducted Under
I
(e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,224
703
S70
122
177
693
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
980
1,257
95
190
3,628
16,187
12,643
16,013
14,240
1 1,833
10,277
52,018
58,515
65
305
73
65
101
63
329
449
157
B-4, 3
-------
B-4: AND OF !
IL
H,
IN
W
IN
M
IN
W
W
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
K
IN
IN
IN
IN
VMfe.
WoodRi¥«
Baity
Breed
Cayugi
Cayuga
Clifiy Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Clifty Creek
Elmer W Stout
EtaerW Stout
Elmer W Stout
F B Culley
FBCuIley
FBCulley
Frank ERatts
Frank ERatts
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
Gibson
HTPtitefaard
HTPritetord
H T Pritchatd
StaeitfUfiaiD
2
1
7
8
1
1
2
CS001(1,2, 3)
1
2
3
(4, 5, 6)
4
5
6
50
60
70
(2, 3)
2
3
1SG1
2SG1
CS0003(1.2)
1
2
3
4
CS596 (5, 6)
5
6
(8)
W*l
Table 1
fable 1
Table!
Tablet
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table i
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
Substitution
Tablet
SO2
Emissions
—JMSjSL.
0
6,246
0
44,666
46,504
47,«34
43,870
5,282
fi,151
27,424
2,549
10,038
10,604
99,980
60,912
3,783
5,932
SO2
Ewiissfeiis
0
3,135
0
38,676
32,134
50.661
53,668
6,045
5,466
26,764
5,214
8,066
91,546
35,273
8,993
7,068
1996
Allowances
§
30,088
39,951
20,280
47,134
37,415
19,620
19,289
19,873
19,552
18,851
19.844
4.253
5,229
25,883
4,703
18,603
9,131
9.2%
44.288
44,956
45,033
56,010
1,458
6,325
as of
573
0
1SJ33
37,0»
35.0S7
56,070
50,1»
23,191
21,135
21,816
11,236
2X564
23,557
6,249
5,651
26,819
6,857
5,661
10,774
9,478
59,319
60,447
59,257
65,038
1,557
5,734
fer
(i)
419
0
1,576
0
32,134
16.887
16,887
16,887
17,890
17,889
17,889
6,045
5,466
26,764
4,800
0
5,284
i.066
43,419
41,127
35,273
8,993
1,449
5,619
Special i»»l
(e)
0
0
ft
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
823
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
154
0
16,757
34,761
35.0S7
17,394
18,061
6,311
4,248
4,929
5,346
4,675
5,668
204
185
55
2,057
5,661
4,667
1,412
15,900
1X320
23,984
56,045
108
115
IN
IN
IN
IN
W
IN
IN
IN
Michigan City
Petersburg
Petersburg
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
R Gallagher
RGmlbgtar
12
1
2
CS0001 (1, 2)
1
2
CS0002 (3, 4)
3
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
12,261
21,305
41,356
25,393
26,237
14,841
10,473
16,002
21,609
28,826
48,963
18,011
35,496
13,908
12.644
13,127
70,782
10,878
16,524
16,689
15,557
18,656
14,841
10,473
16.002
9,367
12,242
15,120
55,941
405
522
7,322
3,315
3,536
B-4, 4
-------
B-4: AMD OF i
w
IN
K
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
W
»
W
W
KS
KS
KY
KY
K¥
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KT
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
R Gallagher
Tamers Creek
Ri»er
Wsbash River
River
Wtbash River
Wabash River
Wanttdk
LaCygne
Qaifrftro
Cooper
Cooper
Cooper
EWBmm
IWBRwrn
BW Blown
EWBrown
Etaw Smith
Elmer Smith
Etacr Smith
Onsen River
BLSprfock
HmpSL Station 2
Btnp&L Station 2
hmte
EPStwa
RBOteen
Stack/Unit ID
4
U4
1
2
3
5
6
(1, X 3}
3
I
2
4
1
2
CI
C2
C3
CSI (1. 2)
1
2
1
CS»3(2,3)
2
3
2
XS12(1.2)
1
2
1
S
1
HI
H2
3
61
G2
Unit type (a)
Table I
fiblel
I
1
Table I
Table 1
Opt-In
I
Substitution
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Tibtol
Substitution
Table I
Table 1
Table I
fiblel
Table 1
Table I
TsMel
fable I
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Emiasiuiss
197
0
37,682
3,872
2,893
15,759
18,500
18.013
18,389
4,259
23,4*
11,378
7.SS5
S.3I1
1§,448
15,297
10,616
10,fil6
155,612
1.5SO
I,6i9
SO2
EaiissliiBS
55,629
6,372
1,715
17,749
19,919
I9.4SS
16,652
5.500
33,012
1
6,280
7,414
13,334
2,315
3,578
1,085
2,314
1996
Allowances
(e)
12,512
27,209
5,558
5,874
4,111
4.838
17,362
13,777
15,272
15,895
29,577
23,489
4,109
20,912
19,363
16,205
7,254
14,917
6,923
12.121
35,334
17,447
6,341
14,031
63,448
15,597
22.181
19,533
19,180
135,688
5,«l
6.073
Held IB
17,003
142,139
6,851
7,956
10,048
6,624
27,709
14,377
14.378
15,295
58.410
8,811
5,325
19,842
22,250
21,778
8,440
17.513
19,939
31,653
77,152
21,385
2.743
10,457
for I
(d) (*)
!3,70S
59,876
4.1S7
5,891
5,425
5^!43
22,425
14,114
13,21i
9,828
55,629
6,372
1,715
17,7*9
19,919
»,4ft
5,495
11,157
5,500
9,376
23,636
11,021
1,114
4,3%
7.4S4
I0,l«2
13,334
2,315
3,578
146,2fl
1.0S5
2,314
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,406
0
0
1.0S2
0
§
0
0
0
0
§
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
to It??
3,297
S2,2«3
2,654
2.0S
4,623
1,379
5,214
193
1,100
1,061
2,7*1
2,439
2,528
2,093
X33I
2,290
2,945
6,356
14,439
22,277
53,516
10,362
859
2,006
S1.9J7
16,444
17,393
6,331
4,707
38,709
7,417
8.143
B-4, 5
-------
B-4: AND OF I
State
KY
MA
MA
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
Shawnee
Mount Tom
CP Crane
CP Crane
Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Chalk Point
Morgifitown
Morgantown
RP Smith
R P Smith
DaiEKam
DanEKam
J C Weadock
J C Weadock
J C Weadock
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
JH Campbell
J H Casipbell
JR Whiting
J R Whiting
High Bridge
Bridge
High Bridge
High
High Bridge
Sheibame County
Sherbume County
Sheibume County
-Asbury
Hawthorn
James River
River
River
IB
10
1
«
i
2
CSE120.2)
J
2
3
4
1
9
11
1
2
(7, 8)
7
8
CSOOQ9
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
State
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NH
NH
NH
NJ
MI
NY
NY
Montose
Mosteose
New Madrid
Rush Wand
KushMiwi
Siblej?
Sibfcy
Sioux
Sioux
Soudmmt
TtenasHill
ThonasBill
ThowHitl
fckWateos
Jack
SD Morrow
RBMouow
Victor I DniielJr
-Mffiimwcic
l«ffilfllllS6lC
BlEngtand
Dunkik
Dunkiik
StadrtMtlD
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
CS023(2,J)
2
3
1
2
1
2
CS«»tfl,2,3)
1
2
3
J
2
1
MB1
4
5
1
2
2
1
2
I
1
2
CS0003P.4)
3
IMtf
fable 1
Tabfe!
T*l« i
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Title 1
Table 1
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
T*l«l
Table 1
Substitution
Tsblel
Table!
Table 1
SO2
lairiMaiM
1995 (k)
23,321
23,236
38,025
44,223
1,852
5,161
2,317
5,644
8.S27
7,926
21,412
22,209
12,214
27,477
20,379
2,144
2,817
3,7®
10,404
W.577
38,044
2,914
3,618
10.16S
10,450
2S,67t
11,155
18,101
3JS19
34,621
SO2
UjStl
6,899
51,536
36,790
3344
3,522
5,482
4,678
2,877
5,431
8,855
8,007
13,225
14,044
17,193
22.358
34,038
3,066
2,934
4,«85
9,791
19,627
43,588
4,847
3,749
9,476
10,606
24,037
9,291
18,568
1,752
31,867
39,055
36,718
39,249
34,994
1,816
1,948
4,166
4,507
7,196
7,984
9,824
27.497
31,625
26,935
30,146
2,782
3,332
15,170
21,976
23,067
3,922
9,980
18.SSO
14,011
17,439
35,734
4,571
5,002
9,851
9,922
21,421
20,127
14,365
18,357
12,268
BeUtia
IMtAccMMb
12,789
38,481
56,723
40,465
3,730
3,817
6,230
5,153
3,021
3,022
2,681
46,167
32,624
32,458
3S,«3
4,127
5,206
21,179
24,652
37,455
5,700
13,143
12,011
17,618
22,075
47,015
5,626
5,936
11,889
11,072
24,464
29,099
24,151
3,505
30,791
11,681
6,899
51,536
36,790
3,344
3,522
5,682
4,678
2.877
2.S7J
2,553
8,855
8,007
13,225
J4.044
1,789
5,789
14,315
22,}5i
34,031
3,066
2,934
4,685
9.798
!9,627
43^18
4,847
3,749
9,47
-------
B-4: AMD OF I
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
MY
MY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
CM
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
CM
Oweaidp!
MUiiken
Milliken
Northpart
Northport
Osw^go
Fort Jefferson
Port its/earn
Roaton
Rosetesn
Acme
Acme
Acme
Aci»e
Acme
Acme
Ashtabula
Aron Lake
AronLake
Avon Lake
AFOfiLake
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Bay Shore
Cardinal
Cardinal
ConesviJJe
Conesville
ComsvilJe
Conesvjlle
Conesville
Eastlake
4
6
XS12(1,2)
1
2
]
2
3
4
4
5
6
3
4
1
2
13
14
IS
16
91
92
7
9
10
11
12
CSS (1,2, 3, 4)
1
"i
3
4
1
2
CS012(1,2)
1
2
3
4
I
Unit Type (a)
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table ]
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table !
Table!
Table!
SO2
EmfariMS
9,316
4,114
2,22!
4,047
538
0
0
837
3,640
2,636
1,607
2,381
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,183
2,594
3,309
0
21,921
25.051
S3, 160
22,146
19,753
8,125
62,940
8,635
SO2
Emissions
7,144
4,471
4060
3,484
1,384
0
0
772
2,835
4,499
^903
4,02!
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863
25,025
76,138
28,212
25,264
12.794
58,778
13,095
B-4, 8
159*
jUtaMMHICtS
13,690
7,342
10,116
12,083
19,219
23.4T6
25,713
5,516
371
12,365
4,499
10,194
12,006
19,147
16,872
9
13
1?
1,930
740
662
18,351
8.763
7,879
12,771
33,413
7,414
6,957
7,58$
12.4*1
84,106
42,008
8,924
5,360
12,593
53,463
8,551
Ifcliini
14,743
12,411
9,651
750
17,263
7.342
5,743
9,360
19,147
16,872
0
0
0
0
0
0
45,954
1,718
4,218
0
31,405
6,414
5,957
6,585
11,481
79,945
63,387
18,939
13,909
18,331
76,313
14,467
15,411
7,144
2.34S
2,13
6,060
3.4S4
4,«4f
1JS4
0
0
772
2,835
4,4»
2,903
4,021
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,910
1,231
3,668
0
27,863
5,005
5,005
6,006
9,009
76,138
28,212
12,017
13,247
12,794
58,778
13,095
(e)
§
0
0
0
254
0
0
23
§
0
0
0
0
1,63!
1,030
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20,716
1239S
4,581
750
17,263
6^570
2,908
4,161
14,613
11,821
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,044
417
550
0
3,542
1,409
952
379
2,472
3,801
35,175
6,922
662
5,537
17,535
1,372
-------
B-4: AID OF I
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Plant Name
Eastlake
Eastlake
Edfeewater
R%e«ater
E%ewster
Gen JM Gavin
Gen J M Gavin
Gorge
Oorpg
JMStuurt
JM Stuart
I M Stuart
JMStuart
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Kyger Creek
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Lake Shore
Miami Fort
Miami fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Miami Fort
Muskingum River
Mxisktngura River
Musktfsgjim River
Mxiskingwm River
Muskingum River
Muskingiira River
Wiles
Wiles
Pieway
Poston
Fostoo
2
3
4
5
11
12
13
1
2
25
26
1
2
3
4
(30010,2.3,4.5)
I
2
3
4
5
IS
91
92
93
94
(5-1, 5-2,6)
5-1
5-2
6
7
€8014(1,2,3,4)
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
9
1
2
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table I
Tablet
Table t
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Emissions
1995 (b)
13,025
14,451
23,405
57,855
0
0
10
11.945
11,533
0
0
22,861
31,903
25,034
27,841
92,806
0
0
0
0
0
4,193
21,301
102,908
14,648
13,080
12,340
4.722
0
0
SO2
Emissions
1996 (b)
13.779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4
21,370
40,672
0
0
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226
123,599
1,433
0
0
0
0
14,421
38.985
160,368
20,223
7,110
15,375
15,071
0
0
1996
(e)
9,471
10.984
15,906
42,495
1,062
1,145
5,536
192,63?
188,168
2,553
2,860
41,189
39,041
38,712
40,925
18,773
18,072
17,439
18.218
18,247
4,508
44
80
62
102
417
417
12,475
42,216
38,001
34,026
36,130
34,153
44,364
18,504
14,321
11,961
0
0
HeMfct
Unit
as of 1/30/97
15,21?
12,267
24,809
66,063
0
0
1,036
29,789
51,449
0
0
46,681
40,631
42,976
43,222
25,148
25,148
25,148
25.148
25,148
2,180
0
0
0
0
761
762
22,889
53,170
49,026
41,533
45,741
43,862
74,080
12,608
20,249
17,843
3,797
3,542
Allowances
for
•;'•;«)
13,779
10,599
22,538
60,719
0
0
4
40,672
0
0
22,910
28,054
25,957
22,226
24,719
24,720
24,720
24,720
24,720
1,433
0
0
0
0
530
531
13,360
31,985
35,477
39,555
43,563
41,173
20,223
7,110
15.375
15,071
0
0
(e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Allowances
1,438
1,668
X271
5,344
0
0
1,032
1,419
10,777
0
§
23,771
12,577
17,019
20,996
429
428
428
42S
421
747
0
0
0
0
231
231
9,529
14,115
13,549
1,978
2,178
2,089
53,857
5,498
4,874
2,772
3,797
3,542
B-4, i
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
State
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
Plant Name
Poston
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
REBwger
RE Burger
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
REBurger
Toronto
Toronto
Toronto
WHSammis
WHSammis
WHSammis
Walter CBeckjord
Walter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brynner Island
Brunner Island
Brunner Hand
Brusmer Hand
Cheswick
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Hatfielifs Ferry
Hatfielcfs Ferry
Hatfiel*5 Ferry
Httfiekh Ferry
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Martins Creek
Mitchell
Newcastle
Stack/Unit ID
3
CS000!(1,2,3,4,S,6,7,8)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
5
6
7
S
6
I
2
1
2
CS102(I,2)
1
2
3
i
1
2
XS123 (1.2,3)
1
2
3
CS!02(1,2)
1
2
3
4
33
1
Unit Type (a)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table!
Table!
Table 1
Table!
Table I
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table!.
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table!
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
1995 (b)
0
41,658
0
0
0
12,627
27,041
22,162
8,347
17,479
4,711
17,196
7.38S
5,532
41,061
56,335
42,900
4,729
73,364
164,841
10,762
3,045
3,455
835
0
SOI
EntWoHS
1996 (b)
0
62.5S7
0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
2^761
40,041
16,4%
15,654
5,831
8,159
47,771
44,832
39,980
3,376
3,732
153,413
24,601
2,442
3,016
728
0
1996
AHwHHtew
0
2,820
2,751
2,891
2,956
4,797
4,807
21,973
23,127
5,315
9,505
10,274
26,496
43,773
47,380
9,811
25,235
17,738
15,024
10,510
11,537
27,030
31,995
60,571
38,139
95,378
85,753
55,732
57,506
56,580
12,327
12,483
12,553
11,548
1,101
1,367
HeMIn
UMttAcCMHliS
as of 1/30/97
4,642
0
0
0
0
3,371
3,371
38,245
31,751
0
0
0
26,496
43,773
47,380
26,843
46,790
18,146
17,219
14,898
15,926
33,530
40,033
106,089
42,819
20,054
20,128
58,400
63,200
52,500
19,273
19,585
12,553
11,548
800
1,367
Deducted for
0
0
0
0
0
950
958
33,743
26,906
0
0
0
12,247
30,444
27,966
22,761
40,041
16,496
15,654
5,831
8,159
22,672
25,099
44,832
39,980
3,376
3,732
52,602
55,722
45,089
14,046
10,555
2,442
3,016
728
0
I
Provisions (e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CarrWOwer
4,642
0
0
0
0
2,421
2,413
4,502
4,845
0
0
0
14,249
13,329
19,414
4,082
6,749
1,650
1,565
9,067
7,767
10,858
14,934
61,257
2,839
16,678
16,396
5,798
7,478
7,411
5,227
9,030
10,111
8,532
72
1,367
B-4,10
-------
B-4: AID OF I
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
TN
TO
TN
TN
TN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
NewCaslIe
Portland
Potbnd
Shwnrilto
Shnraiile
Stawville
Shawrille
Sunbufy
Suntary
Allen
Allen
Alien
Cumberland
Cumberland
DuPont Johnsomilk
DuPetit Johss^pfilie
DuPont Johnsortfitle
DuPort Johnseiwiile
Gallatin
Gsllatm
Gallatm
Galtatin
CMlatin
Gatbtin
JahiisonviHe
Johnsormlle
Jahnsonville
Johnsotwille
Johnsoitville
Johnsonvitte
JotosofwilJe
Johnsonvilk
JohnsGiwille
Johnsonville
Johnsawille
Alma
Alma
Ataa
Edgewster
Qenot
Staefc/UiimB
2
I
2
1
2
CSt<3,4)
3
4
3
4
1
1
3
1
2
JVD1
JVD2
JVD3
JTO4
CSOA12(!,2)
!
2
CSGA34 (3, 4)
3
4
CSJO10 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}
!
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CS1 (B4, B5)
B4
B5
3
4
1
Omit Type {•}
Substitution
T*!el
Table 1
Table I
Tabie 1
Tublel
Tabie 1
1
Table!
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table!
Tsblel
Opt-to
Opt-In
Opt-fc
Opt-to
I
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Table 1
Tabie 1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Table 1
Table 1
1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
KB
EmlsslHts
1995 (h)
0
11, OSS
11,055
14,265
!0,B7
33,302
9J47
9,511
13,144
16,512
11,618
12,445
13,685
0
0
0
0
41,243
51,122
1 14,677
2,764
1,166
6,412
15,304
SO2
bnlsstaia
0
11,963
13,820
10,587
13.474
29,884
9,511
10,939
5,434
6,»3
8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0
55,363
61,303
126,367
3,471
1,482
737S
11,420
B-4, 11
1996
1,520
9,373
17,309
10,048
10,048
13,846
13,700
9,133
11,392
14,917
16,329
15,258
165,080
172,416
889
889
889
888
32,218
31,674
36,179
33,879
7,585
7,828
8,189
7,780
8,023
7,682
8,744
8,471
6,894
7,351
5,105
8,155
4,493
24,099
22,103
Ilehtfel
1,520
36,932
14,367
12,332
15,349
20,541
15,988
16,327
14,114
2X546
24,584
24,564
168,310
152,615
0
0
0
0
37,170
37,187
42,080
40,685
15.107
19,542
15,919
14,752
10,837
15,135
1 7,287
19,543
13,231
16,661
9,458
14.92S
7,820
22,249
18,598
0
11^63
13,820
10,587
13,414
16,950
1X934
9,511
10,939
5,434
8,395
9,524
13,252
0
0
0
0
25,853
29,510
28,130
33,!73
12,644
12,424
13,242
12,691
8.304
12,141
14,684
15,003
11,140
14,094
1,736
1,735
1,482
7,378
11,420
SpecUriMsel
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
§
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
«30
0
0
0
0
CunfedOvcr
101997
1,520
24,969
S47
1.745
1,875
3,591
3,054
6,116
3,175
17,112
18,011
16,169
158,786
139,363
0
0
0
0
11317
7,677
13,950
7,512
2,463
7.118
2,677
XOS1
2,533
2,994
2,603
4,540
2,091
2,573
7.092
13,193
6,338
14,871
7,178
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
we
Wl
WJ
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
W¥
wv
W¥
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
JPMsdgrtt
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
Nelson Dewey
North O«k Creek
North O»k Creek
North O* Creek
North Oak Creek
Pott Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Wmshinj^on
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pultiam
PuUiam
Putliam
PuUian
PullifUn
RoekRi¥er
Rock Ri¥er
South Oak Creek
Sooth Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
Weston
Westoa
Albright
Albright
Albright
Fort Martin
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Hanrison
Harrison
Kammer
Kammer
Kaouncr
Kammer
Bi
CS1 (1, 2)
1
2
1
2
3
4
€37(1,2.3}
!
2
3
4
5
CSS6{5,6)
S
6
?
8
I
2
CS3 (5, 6)
S
6
CS4(7, 8)
7
8
I
2
I
2
3
1
2
XS123(1,2,3)
1
2
3
0, 2, 3)
I
2
3
Sitbstitortieft
fablel
1
TaMsl
Tafclel
Tail* I
Tafcfal
Substitution
StAstitutiofi
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitsition
Substitution
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Table 1
Table I
Table 1
Table!
Table 1
Table 1
TiHel
f total
832
Emissions
1995 (b)
5,746
4,127
0
0
0
0
2,242
0
1,152
1,466
2,0$7
1,637
1,434
11,006
15.663
969
1,936
2,386
2,358
11,444
26,803
43,171
9,944
122,193
SO2
4,145
1,836
0
0
0
0
7,119
1,»1
0
1,518
1,574
Z44S
1,337
1.3S9
13,543
20.71*
1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
J7.468
16,469
119,369
1996
AHocatcd(c)
«,862
5,852
6,504
5,083
5,005
5,229
4154
1,968
3,782
3,108
2,745
3,412
2,097
2,844
7.3J7
7,312
5,398
4,034
9,416
11.723
15,754
15,375
1,579
3,580
4,831
5,024
11,684
41,905
44,118
82,613
91,180
90,727
18.247
18,948
16,932
(M
Unit
4,764
5J21
0
0
0
0
l,»i
2,44t
3.4SS
0
710
1,120
1,900
9,1 59
tf.634
8,976
5.921
11,400
11,389
1.300
2,400
1,600
2,350
10,111
31,053
41,215
6,849
4,341
6,927
45,549
5I.63S
41,6W
for
£d}
4,145
I,8»
1,956
0
§
0
0
1,110
2327
3,142
1,991
0
$92
926
1,574
2,445
1,337
1,389
8,i60
5,383
10,364
10,354
1,106
2,021
1,449
1,962
9,246
33,684
37,461
6406
3,969
fi,294
43,380
36,301
(e)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
§
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
§
0
ABavnnKes
Gififcil Ower
toiff?
3,t3S
2.IS4
3,865
0
0
0
0
111
222
314
99
0
118
194
326
455
7,122
5,245
816
538
1,036
1,035
194
579
151
388
925
3,74?
643
3S
6J3
2.169
22,328
1,984
B-4. 12
-------
B-4: AND OF 1
State
WV
wv
WV
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
Hunt Name
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mitchell
Mt Statin
MtStonn
MtStotm
MtStonn
Rivesrilie
Rivesville
Stock/Unit ID
CS012(1,2)
1
2
CSO(1,2)
1
2
3
7
8
1
Table 1
Table!
Table!
Table!
Substitution
Substitution
SO2
Embsioas
199S(b)
61,623
95,244
2,549
488
1,357
SO2
Eniaalaas
53,152
107,211
5,096
233
1,03?
1996
ABotmices
42,923
44,312
49,48!
45,203
49.S59
1,009
3,059
MeMiii
0(4*1/30/97
63,555
53,596
63,669
61,460
fi6,838
450
1400
Deincteiifer
(
-------
B-5:
I la 1996 19,67? for
Is to 0.4 for 10,268 of
for 9,409
cap
is no SO2 cap I for not by the
II. not I
to II for the
at
To are in I
I (1995-1999). Any Phase I unit that had a lower in 1996
the the 1985-87 (i.e.,
it this by in to sulfur-free (e.g.,
or at
I in the units, or a in
If the for the do not fall one or
it is the 1 to II and the
I has to The of is on the
and the of the II
For 1996, for at in the
and Electric Corporation, Long Island Lighting Company,
City City, and Company. Unit 1 In York
the of allowances (1,631), and Northport Unit 4, in New York,
the (23
list for for an for An
Is to its utilization of Its is below its
-1987). 2 4,406 for in 1996.
are to a
cap be the end
Is EPA did not the cap in the
at the end
the cap Is the limit. For units, on the
EPA the for if not,
or the as units.
B-5,1
-------
As a cap Is to be the EPA the
be to the unit, any In
are the However, for the and in the
unit may effectively use a future year
to the deduction. In instances, there will be no net deduction for
are this use of future to a of
the and provisions.)
In the to the in 1996, EPA
9,409 at Unit B4, is by the
and wis to use to Its
In to its 1996 to
1996 and a future year account. The other two units
the cap are Unit 1 (6,147 and
1 (2,632
For
the be EPA on the
and in the
cap the to be a If
this is to be the is and its
Is to EPA, it as a unit for the
In 1996, Units 2, 3, and 4 as
B-5,2
-------
C-l:
and
Alabama Power Co
QPSCO
Daityland Power Coop
East Kentucky Power Coop
Georgia Power Co
GPU
26 KCGastonAI, 1-5
7 OudsderiALl-2
862 Grand Tower tt, 07-09
863 IL 05, 06
864 Meredosia CL 0 1 -05
6017 Newton IL 1,2
4140 AlmaWIB4sB5
4143 Genoa WI 1
4271 JPMadRettWIBl
1384 Cooper KYI, 2
699 Arkwright GA 1 -4
703 Bowen GA 1 BLR - 4BLR
708 Hammond GA 1-4
709 Harllee Branch GA 2
1 1 0 Jack Mcdonough GA MB 1 ,
733 Kraft OA 1-3
6124 Meintesh GA 1
727 OA 3
6257 SchererGA3
6052 WansleyGA1,2
728 Yates GA Y2BR - Y7BR
3113 Portland PA 1,2
0.48
0.45
0.48
0.50
0.46
0.45
0.43
042
0.39
0.41
0.43
0.40
C-L 1
-------
C-i:
Gulf Power Co
Hoosier Energy
IES Utilities, Inc.
Power Co
Indianapolis Power & Light
Monongahela Power Co
NYSEO
Northern States Power Co
641 Crist FL 4-6
642
6073 Victor J Jr MS 1 , 2
1 043 Frank E Rails IN I SGL
1104 Burlington IA 1
1073 Prairie Creek IA 4
889 1L 3
§92
89? Vermilion IL 1,2
990 Elmer W IN 50, 60, 70
991 H T Pritehard IN 3-6
994 Petersburg IN 1-4
Albright WV 1-3
3178 Armstrong PA 2
3181
6004 PleasantsPAl,!
1570 RP Smith PA 9, 11
2527 OreenidgeNY6
2535 MHlikenNYL2
1912 High Bridge MN 3-6
6090 Saerbume County MN 1 , 2
047
0.50
0,47
0.45
0.45
0.49
0.45
0.46
0.41
0.47
0.31
0.40
0,36
0.38
0.41
0.30
C-1,2
-------
C-l:
and
Plan late
Ohio Edison Co
PSI Energy, Inc.
South Elcc Power
Springfield City of (MO)
TVA
6094 Brace PA 1 , 2
285? EdgewaterOHB
2858 Gorge OH 25, 26
3138 New Castle PA 1,2
2867 Toronto OH 10, 11
W H OH 5, 6
3140 Brunner PA 1-3
3148 Martins Creek PA 1 , 2
3152 Simbury PA 3, 4
1001 CayugaINl,2
6018 East Bend IN 2
6113 Gibson IN 1-3
2832 Fort OH 6
1008 R Gallagher IN 1-4
1010 River IN 2-6
Walter C OH 5. 6
606 1 R D Morrow MS 1 , 2
2161 James River MO 3-5
6195 Southwest MO 1
4? Colbert AL 1-4
3403 GallatinTNl-4
3406 Johrisonville TN 1 - 1 0
0.50
0.4?
0,48
I
0,42
0.41
0.42
0.50
0,4?
0.50
0.48
0.48
0.44
C-l, 3
-------
C-l:
Utility
Code Name, State and
Union Electric Co
Wisconsin Electric Power
Wisconsin Public Service Corp
2103
2104
6155
4040
4041
4042
4072
4078
LabadieMOl-4
Meramee MO 1 -4
Rush Island MO 1,2
Port Washington WI1 -4
South Oak Creek WI 5-8
Valley WI 1-4
Pulliain WI 7,8
Weston WI 1-3
C-l, 4
-------
C-2: 1 NOr for 1996
ST
EL
GA
IN
IN
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
MD
MD
MD
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
wv
WV
WV
W¥
WV
WV
WV
Plant Name
Crist
Yates
Gibson
Wabash River
Coleman
Coleman
Coieman
E W Brown
E W Brown
Ghent
HMP&L Station 2
HMP&L Station 2
Chalk Point
Morgatrtown
Morgantown
R E Burger
R E Burger
Armstrong
Conemaugh
Conemaugh
Fort Martin
Harrison
Harrison
Harrison
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Mt Storm
Operating Utility
Gulf Power Co
Georgia Power Co
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Kentucky Utilities Co
Kentucky Utilities Co
Kentucky Utilities Co
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Big Rivers Electric Corp
Potomac Electric Power Co
Potomac Electric Power Co
Potomac Electric Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
West Penn Power Co
GPU Generation Corporation
GPU Generation Corporation
Monongahela Power Co
Monongahela Power Co
Monongahela Power Co
MonoQgahela Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
Virginia Electric & Power Co
ORE
Code
641
728
6113
1010
1381
1381
1381
1355
1355
1356
1382
1382
1571
1573
1573
2864
2864
3178
3118
3118
3943
3944
3944
3944
3954
3954
3954
1
Y1BR
4
1
Cl
C2
C3
2
3
1
HI
H2
1
1
2
7
8
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
•2
3
Extension
Type
40CFRPart72
40CFRPart72
40CFRPart72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR. Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 72
40 CFR Part 76
40 CFR Part 76
40CERPart76
1996 Unit
Extension
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Jan-97
Ol-Aug-97
Ol-Jan-98
Ol-Jan-97
0.48
0.47
0.35
0.29
0.49
0.46
1.28
0.42
0.42
0.56
0.83
0.62
0.77
0.65
0.65
0.74
0.72
0.36
0.43
0.40
0.59
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.84
0.84
0.79
C-2,1
-------
fur the 239 In
1996
ST
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
CM
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
Colbert
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
E C Gaston
Oadsden
Gadsden
Big
Crist
Crist
Crist
Scholz
Seholz
ArkwrigM
Arkwright
Arkwright
Arfcwright
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Bowen
Hammond
Hammond
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Alabama Power Co
Tampa Electric Co
Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
" Gulf Power Co
Gulf Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
onus
Code
4?
4?
47
47
47
26
26
26
26
26
7
7
645
641
641
641
642
642
699
699
699
699
703
703
703
703
708
708
Boiler
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
I
2
BB04
4
5
6
1
2
1
2
•>
,">
4
1BLR
2BLR
3BLR
4BLR
1
2
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.44
0.40
0.40
0.41
0.41
0.43
0.61
0.65
0.37
0.50
0.61
0.45
0.62
0.70
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.42
0.43
0.45
0.45
0.78
0.78
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.48
0.48
0,48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
%
Rate to 1996
0.80
0.67
0.83
0.86
0.78
0.90
0.78
0.80
0.80
0.78
0.51
0.56
0.46
0.43
0.49
1.04
0.69
0.80
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.67
0.65
0.56
0.58
0.84
0.84
-46%
-36%
-48%
-50%
-44%
-56%
^9%
-49%
-49%
-45%
20%
16%
-20%
16%
24%
-57%
-10%
-13%
-8%
-8%
-8%
-8%
-37%
-34%
-20%
-22%
-7%
-7%
C-3,1
-------
C-3: for the 239 in
1996
ST
GA
OA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
OA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
Plant
Hammond
Hammond
Harllee Branch
Jack Mcdonough
Jack Mcdonough
Kraft
Kraft
Kraft
Mcintosh
Mitchell
Scherer
Wansley
Wansley
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yates
Yaies
Yates
Burlington
Milton L Kapp
Prairie Creek
Riverside
Baldwin
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Grand Tower
Hennepin
Operating Utility
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Savannah Electric & Power
Savannah Electric & Power
Savannah Etectric & Power
Savannah Electric & Power
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
Georgia Power Co
IES Utilities. Inc.
Interstate Power Co
IES Utilities, Inc.
Midamericaii Energy Co
Illinois Power Co
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
Illinois Power Co
QMS
Code
708
708
709
710
710
733
733
733
6124
727
6257
6052
6052
728
728
728
728
728
728
1104
1048
1073
1081
889
862
862
862
892
Boiler
3
4
2
MB1
MB2
1
2
3
1
3
3
I
2
Y3BR
Y4BR
Y5BR
Y6BR
Y7BR
I
2
4
9
J
1
8
9
i
&
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard I, imitation
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
050
0.50
030
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.78
0.45
0.74
0.40
0.40
0.59
0.59
0.59
0.81
0.61
0.28
0.39
0.41
0.49
0.49
0.41
0.41
0.33
0.31
0.32
0.34
0.29
0.37
0.36
0.73
0.77
0.56
0.52
Avg
Plan
Unit
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0,46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.47
0.47
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Avg
Plan
late
0.43
0,43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0.43
0,43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.31
0.31
0.40
0.42
0,42
0.42
0.40
% Change
Emission from 1990
to 1996
0.84
1.20
0.99
0.66
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.83
0.61
0.20
0.73
0.67
0.62
0.62
0.56
0.65
0.67
0,61
0.63
0.80
1.05
0.82
0.67
0.78
0.96
0.64
0.59
-7%
-63%
-25%
-39%
-33%
48%
48%
48%
-2%
0%
40%
47%
-39%
-21%
-21%
-27%
-37%
-5!%
-49%
-49%
-58%
-72%
-55%
-46%
-6%
-20%
-13%
-12%
-------
C-3: for the NOX In 1996
1996
ST
IL
IL
1L
1L
1L
EL
EL
IL
EL
BL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
EL
IN
M
M
IN
IN'
M
IN
IN
IN
IN
M
Plant Name
Hutsonville
i lutsonvilte
Joppa Steam
Joppa StcaiB
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Joppa Steam
Meredosia
Meredosta
Meredosia
Meredosia
Mercdosia
Newton
Newton
Vennillon
Vermilion
Cayuga
Cayuga
Elmer W Stout
timer W Stout
Timer W Stout
F B Culley
F B Culley
Frank E Ratts
Frank E Ratts
Gibson
Gibson
Operating Utility
C1PSCO
CIPSCO
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric Energy Inc
Electric F.nergy Inc
ESeetrie Energy Inc
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
CIPSCO
Illinois Power Co
- Illinois Power Co
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Southern Indiana Gas & Eke
Southern Indiana Gas & Hlec
Hoosier Fnergy
Hoosier Energy
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
OMB
Code
863
863
887
887
887
887
887
887
864
864
864
864
864
6017
6017
897
897
1001
1001
990
990
990
1012
1012
1043
1043
6113
6113
Boiler
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
1
2
1
2
1
2
50
60
70
2
3
1SG1
2SG1
1
2
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation-
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging PJan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.45
0.45
0.45
0,45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
050
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.54
O.S6
0.2?
0,27
0.24
0.24
0.25
0.25
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.64
0.30
0.34
0.29
0.29
0.35
0.36
03?
0.38
0,33
0.45
0.45
0.49
0.46
0.51
0.51
Avg
Plan
Limit
0,45
0-45
0.45
0.45
0,45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.48
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0,48
0.48
Avg
Plan
Eate
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0,42
0,42
0.42
0.42
0.40
0.40
0.42
0.42
0.36
0,36
0.36
0.47
0.47
0.42
0.42
%
1990
to 1996
0.70
0.67
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.56
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.67
0.47
0.39
0.94
0.74
0.42
0.47
0.63
0.65
0.71
1.05
1.23
1.08
1.09
1.03
1.12
-23%
-16%
-52%
-52%
-57%
-57%
-55%
-55%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-4%
-36%
-13%
-69%
-61%
-17%
-23%
-41%
-42%
-54%
-57%
-63%
-55%
-58%
-50%
-54%
C-3. 3
-------
C-3: for the in
1996
ST
IN
IN
JN
IN
IN
IN
m
IN
M
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KY
ICY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
Gibson
H T
H T Pritdiard
H T Pritehard
H T Pritchard
Petersburg
Petersburg
Petersburg
Petersburg
R Gallagher
R
R
R
Wabash River
Wabash River
Wabash River
Wabash River
LA Cygne
Quindaro
Cooper
Cooper
EW Brown
East Bend
Elmer Smith
Green River
H L Spurloek
R D Green
R D Green
PS! Energy, Inc.
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
Indianapolis Power & Light
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy. Inc.
PSI Energy. Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy, Inc.
PSI Energy'. Me.
Kansas City Power & Light
of Pub. UtiL, KS City
East Kentucky Power Coop
East Kentucky Power Coop
Kentucky Utilities Co
Cincinnati Gas
-------
C-3: for the 239 in
1996
m
MD
MD
MD
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
MO
Chalk Point
R P
HP Smith
J H
High Bridge
High Bridge
Comity
County
Hawthorn
Man,
James River
James River
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Merainee
Meramec
Mcramec
Meramec
Montrose
Montrose
Montrose
PEPCO
Potomac Edison Co
Potomac Edison Co
Consumers Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Northern States Power Co
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Springfield City of (MO)
Springfield City of (MO)
Springfield City of (MO)
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Kansas City Power & Light
Union Electric Co
Union Electric Co
O1IS
Code
1571
!570
1570
1710
1912
1912
1912
1912
6090
6090
2079
6065
2161
2161
2161
2103
2103
2103
2103
2104
2104
2104
2104
2080
2080
2080
6155
6155
Boiler
2
9
11
1
3
4
5
6
1
2
5
1
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
Conipltaiee
Approach
ABL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
AEL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Uniit
1.20
0.50
045
0.55
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Eiiils-
slini
Rate
1.02
0,54
0.41
0.44
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.25
0.25
0.38
0.29
0.56
0.64
0.56
0.18
0.22
0.24
0.22
0.71
0,65
0.83
0.37
0.36
0.39
0.39
0.22
0.20
Avg
flan
Limit
0.49
0.49
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
046
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Avg
flan
0.3S
0.3S
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
%
to
1.35
0.87
0.78
0.69
0.48
0.48
048
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.36
0.31
1.02
0.87
0.93
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.62
0.82
0.63
0.96
1.17
032
0.34
0.34
0.63
0-63
-24%
-38%
-47%
-36%
21%
21%
21%
21%
-44%
-44%
6%
-6%
-45%
-26%
-40%
-71%
-65%
-61%
-65%
-13%
3%
-14%
-68%
13%
15%
15%
-65%
-61%
C-3,5
-------
C-3: for the 239 in
19%
ST
MO
MO
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Plant
Southwest
Thomas Hill
Jack Watson
Jack Watson
R D Morrow
R D Morrow
Victor J Daniel Jr
Victor J Daniel Jr
Dunkirk
Dunkirk
Gree nidge
Milliken
Milliken
Ashtabnla
Conesville
Conesvilte
Eastlake
Eastlake
Eastlake
Easflake
Edgewater
Gorge
Gorge
Miami Fort PSI
Picway
Toronto
Toronto
W H
Operating Utility
Springfield City of (MO)
Associated Bleetne Coop Inc
Mississippi Power Co
Mississippi Power Co
South Mississippi El Pwr
South Mississippi El Pwr
Mississippi Power Co
Mississippi Power Co
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
NYSEO
NYSEG
NYSEG
Cleveland Electric ffiuni Co
Columbus Southern Power
Columbus Southern Power
Cleveland Electric Uluna Co
Cleveland Electee Dtum Co
Cleveland Electric Khun Co
Cleveland Electric fltam Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
Columbus Southern Power
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
OM1S
Code
6195
2168
2049
2049
6061
6061
6073
6073
2554
2554
2527
2535
2535
2835
2840
2840
2837
2837
2837
2837
2857
2858
2858
2832
2843
2867
2867
2866
Boiler
1
MB3
4
5
1
2
1
2
3
4
6
1
2
7
3
4
1
2
3
4
13
25
26
6
9
10
11
5
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation.
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Pfan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.35
0.30
0.44
0.53
0.43
0.51
0.30
0.32
033
0.33
0.54
0.38
0.38
0.40
0.45
0.41
0.39
0.37
0.38
0.37
0.17
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.63
0.41
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.43
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.50
0.47
0.4?
0.50
0.50
0.47
0.47
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.48
0.50
A-vg
Rate
0.48
0.41
0.41
0,47
0.47
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.42
0.42
0.42
1990
Emission
0.47
0.31
1.10
1.22
0.42
0.43
0.27
0.28
0.48
0.48
0.55
0.66
0.59
0.61
0.93
0.55
0.49
0.68
0.54
031
O.S7
0.73
0,87
0.52
%
from 1990
to 1996
-26%
-3%
-60%
-57%
2%
19%
11%
14%
-31%
-31%
-2%
-42%
-36%
-34%
-52%
-25%
-20%
-46%
-30%
-27%
-80%
-14%
-53%
-17%
-------
C-3: for the 239 In
1996
ST
OH
OH
OH
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
TN
TO
TN
TN
TN
W H Sainmis
Walter C
Walter C Beckjord
Armstrong
Bruce Mansfield
Bruce Mansfield
Brunnor Island
Brunner Island
Brenner Island
Cbeswiek
Marlins Creek
Martins Creek
Mitchell
New Castle
New Castle
Portland
Portland
Sfiawville
Shawville
Shawville
Shawville
Siinbury
Sunburv
Oallatin
Oailatin
Oallatin
Oallatin
Johnson ville
Operating Utility
Ohio Edison Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co
West Peon Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
PP&L
PP&L
PP&L
Duquesne Light Co
PP&L
PP&L
West Perm Power Co
Ohio Edison Co
Ohio Edison Co
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
GPU
PP&L
PP&L
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
OR1S
Code
2866
2830
2830
3178
6094
6094
3140
3140
3140
8226
3148
3148
3181
3138
3138
3113
3113
3131
3131
3131
3131
3152
3152
3403
3403
3403
3403
3406
Boiler
6
5
6
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
2
33
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.50
0.45
045
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.42
0.39
0.37
039
040
0.43
037
0.37
0.42
0.38
0.49
0.49
0.41
Not Op.
Not Op.
0.31
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.39
0.39
0.40
0.40
047
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.50
048
0.48
049
0.50
0.50
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
047
049
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.47
0.4S
0.4S
0.48
0.41
0.48
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.38
0.42
042
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.38
0.40
0.40
0.41
041
0.44
044
0.44
0.44
0.44
1990
Endssfam
Rate
1.10
0.72
0.71
1.04
0.98
1.13
0.65
0.71
0.83
0.71
1.03
0.93
0.68
0.46
0.66
0.99
1.02
O.S3
0.82
0.93
1.29
0.59
0.63
0.59
0.55
0.45
»/•
1990
to 1996
-62%
-46%
-48%
-63%
-59%
-62%
-43%
-48%
-49%
-46%
-52%
-47%
-40%
-33%
-27%
-52%
-53%
-48%
-48%
-54%
-67%
-34%
-38%
-32%
-27%
4%
C-3. 7
-------
C-3: tor the In
1996
ST
TM
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
TN
UT
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
Johnsonvillc
Johnson ville
Johnsonville
Johnsonville
Johnson ville
Johnson¥ille
Johnsonville
Johnsomdile
Johnsonville
Oadsby
Alma
Alma
Genoa
J P
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Port Washington
Pulliain
Pulliam
South Oak
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
South Oak Creek
Valley
Valley
Valley
Operating Utility
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
TVA
Paciiicorp
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Dairyland Power Coop
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
QMS
Code
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3406
3648
4140
4140
4143
4271
4040
4040
4040
4040
4040
4072
4072
4041
4041
4041
4041
4042
4042
4042
Boiler
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
3
B4
B5
1
Bl
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
A%'cragiog Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
- Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Emis-
sion
Limit
0.45
045
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.50
Emis-
sion
Rate
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.08
0.76
0.76
0.36
0.30
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.29
Not Op.
0.24
0.42
0.23
0.23
0.38
0.38
0.46
0.46
0.47
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.47
0.47
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
Avg
Plan
Rate
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.37
0.37
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
1990
Emission
0.48
0.46
0.54
0.45
0.50
1.00
0.97
1.10
1.07
0.53
0.85
0.85
0.75
0.30
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.37
0.69
0,57
0.28
0.28
0.66
0.67
1.10
1.10
1.05
%
from
to
-2%
2%
-13%
4%
-6%
-53%
-52%
-57%
-56%
-85%
-9%
-9%
-52%
0%
6%
6%
6%
-22%
•65%
-26%
-18%
-18%
-42%
-43%
-58%
-58%
-55%
-------
C-3: for the NOX in
1996
ST
WI
Wl
WI
WI
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
wv
WY
WY
WY
WY
Plant
Valley
Weston
Westoo
Weston
Albright
Albright
Albright
Mitchell
Mitchell
Pleasants
Pleasants
Jim Bridger
Jim Bridger
Jim Bridger
Wyodak
Operating Utility
Wisconsin Electric Power Co
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Wisconsin Public Service
Monongabela Power
Monongahela Power
Monongahela Power
Ohio Power Co
Ohio Power Co
Monongahela Power
Monongahela Power
Paciticorp
Pacificorp
Pacificorp
Pacificorp
OEIS
Code
4042
407i
4078
4078
3942
3942
3942
3948
3948
6004
6004
8066
8066
8066
6101
Boiler
4
1
2
3
I
2
3
I
2
I
2
BW71
BW72
BW73
BW91
Compliance
Approach
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
AEL Demonstration
AEL Demonstration
Averaging Plan
Averaging Plan
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Standard Limitation
Ends-
ilom
Limit
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.56
0.56
0.50
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.50
Ends-
am
Mate
0.47
0.76
0.85
0.21
0,65
0,68
0.39
0.52
0.52
0.40
0.32
0.40
0.37
0.38
0.33
Avg
Plan
Limit
0.41
0.47
0.47
0.47
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.49
Avg
Pbn
0,35
037
0.37
0.37
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
!§»§
Endsskm
Rate
0.93
0.90
1.08
0.26
1.10
1.10
0.71
0.77
0.77
0.52
0.35
0.63
0.51
0.42
0.37
%
•49%
-16%
-21%
-19%
-41%
-38%
-45%
-32%
-32%
-23%
-9%
-37%
-27%
-10%
-11%
C-3, 9
-------
C-4: of
1. Evaluation for Unit Compliance
(B)
The NO, for Is to the NO^ at the as
(AEL) or an AEL this is
(1) For a unit a or
If unit NO, rate s unit NOX
Unit is
else
is
(2) For a in a with other units for the specific compliance year:
a. Locate the associated Stack ID for the unit in the ARCONFIG file.
b. If stack NOX emission rate s unit NOX emission limit
Unit is
else
is Fail.
(3) For a unit with a complex stack configuration:
a. Locate all IDs in ARCONFIG file.
b. NOX rate for all
c. NOX s NO,
is
else
d Calculate NOX pounds for the unit as apportioned to the unit from each
,
NO, = A JVC?, * C/nft *e
C-4,1
-------
C-4: of NO,
e. Calculate the total NO, pounds for the unit:
= M?,
f. Calculate the allowable NOX pounds for the unit:
WO, = M7, * Actual Unit
g. Determine compliance on a NOX pounds basis for the unit:
If Unit NOK Pounds Emitted < Unit Allowable NOX Pounds
Unit compliance is Pass
else
Unit compliance status is Fail.
(b)
If the unit is fail, emissions are computed as follows:
(1) Compute allowable pounds from the unit:
NOX = Unit NO., Emission Limit * Actual Annual Unit
(2) Compute emitted the unit:
a. For a unit associated with a specific stack, multiple stacks, or in a single common stack with other units
affected for the specific compliance year:
NOt Pounds = Actual NO, Emission * Actual Annual Unit
b. For a unit in a complex stack configuration:
NOX Pounds = Sum of (Unit Apportioned Heat Input front Each Stack *
Actual NOS Rate for Each Stack)
C-4,2
-------
C-4: of
(3) to place):
AH?, = - M?, /
2, of in
(a)
For averaging plan, a NO, emissions limit is calculated as follows,
( 1 ) Calculate the allowable NOX pounds for the unit in the plan:
Unit NOX Pounds Allowable = Unit NO, Emission Limit * Actual Annual Unit Heat
(2) Calculate the allowable NO, pounds for the plan:
= Sum o/AU NO,
(3) Calculate the total actual heat input for the plan:
Total Actual Input for Plan = of Annual Input for All
(4) Calculate the allowable NOX emission rate for the plan:
NOt =• T0tatNOx Allowable for / Total Input for Plan
(5) Calculate the NOX pounds for each unit:
OttUNOx NOX *
(6) the NOX for the
NO, the = Unit NOX
(7) the for the
fotol Input for the = of the Annual Input for Each Unit
C-4, 3
-------
C-4: of NOS
(8) Calculate the Annual NO, emission rate for the plan:
Annual NOS Rate for the = NOX
Annual Heat Input for the
(9) Determine NOX compliance for the plan:
If Annual NO, Emission Rate for the Plan s Allowable NOX for the Plan
is
else
is Fail,
(b)
If the plan compliance status is fail, emissions are in to as follows:
NO, »(Total NO, Emitted/or NO, /
C-4,4
-------
SERA
,: '.'•..' ;' •- ';•
• ' •'.-.-".•'..y •'. '•
' :
-;::'.'., "' •
• ;: -\ ' •
' : "'' ''
------- |