Superfund Record of Decision Pease Air Force Base Brooks Ditches OU 11 Portsmouth Newington NH


                                    EPA/ROD/R01-97/163
                                    1997
EPA Superfund
     Record of Decision:
     PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
     EPA ID:  NH7570024847
     OU11
     PORTSMOUTH/NEWINGTON, NH
     09/30/1997

-------
EPA/541/R-97/163


                                Record of Decision
                            Brooks/Ditches Operable Unit
                         Pease Air Force Base,  New Hampshire

                                 September 1997

-------
                              TABIiE OF CONTENTS

Section                           Title                                            Page

       DECLARATION                                                                  vii

I.     SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION                                           1

II.    SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES                                       11

       A.  Zone Use and Response History                                             11
       B.  Enforcement History                                                       12

III.   COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION                                                       14

IV.    SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION                            15

V.     SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS                                               17

       A.  Surface Water Hydrology                                                   17
       B.  Surface Water/Sediment Sources                                            21

VI.    SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS                                                         41

       A.  Data Evaluation and Reduction                                             41
       B.  Human Health Risk Assessment                                              43
       C.  Ecological Risk Assessment                                                46

VII.   DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES                                     53

       A.  Statutory Reguirements/Response Objectives                                53
       B.  Technology and Alternative Development                                    59

VIII.  DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES                                                   62

IX.    SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES                           64

       A.  Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment                    66
       B.  Compliance with ARARs                                                     67
       C.  Long-Term Effectiveness                                                   67
       D.  Reduction in TMV of Contaminants                                          68
       E.  Short-Term Effectiveness                                                  68
       F.  Implementability                                                          70
       G.  Cost                                                                      71
       H.  State Acceptance                                                          71
       I.  Community Acceptance                                                      71

X.     THE SELECTED REMEDY                                                           72

       A.  Methodology for Cleanup Goal Determination                                72
       B.  Pauls Brook                                                               73
       C.  Mclntyre Brook                                                            74
       D.  Description of Remedial Components                                        75

XI.    STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS                                                      77

       A.  The Selected Remedy Is Protective of Human Health and the
           Environment                                                               77
       B.  The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs                                         77
       C.  The Selected Remedial Action Is Cost-Effective                            78
       D.  The Selected Remedy Uses Permanent Solutions and Alternative
           Treatment or Resource Recovery Technologies to the Maximum
           Extent Practicable                                                        79
       E.  The Selected Remedy Does Not Satisfy the Preference for Treatment That
           Permanently and Significantly Reduces the Toxicity, Mobility, or
           Volume of the Hazardous Substances as a Principal Element                 80

-------
XII.   DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES                                          81

XIII.  STATE ROLE                                                                    82

LIST OF REFERENCES                                                                  R-l

LIST OF ACRONYMS                                                                  Acr-1

APPENDIX A - TABLES

APPENDIX B - DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE

APPENDIX C - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY

APPENDIX D - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX

                                   LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No.                              Title                                          Page


   1       General Locations of the IRP Zones and Sites                                   3

   2       Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations - Flagstone and
           Pauls Brooks                                                                   5

   3       Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations - Mclntyre Brook                 8

   4       Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations - Lower Newfields
           Ditch                                                                          9

   5       Distribution of AHCs and HHCs in Surface Water - Flagstone and
           Pauls Brooks                                                                  23

   6       Distribution of Calculated EgP Exceeding AWQC for Organics in
           Flagstone and Pauls Brook Sediments                                           25

   7       Distribution of Metals Exceeding NOAA ER-Ls in Flagstone and
           Pauls Brook Sediments                                                         29

   8       Distribution of Calculated EgP Exceeding AWQC for Organics in
           Mclntyre Brook Sediments                                                      33

   9       Distribution of Metals Exceeding NOAA ER-Ls in Mclntyre Brook
           Sediments                                                                     34

   10      Distribution of Calculated EgP Exceeding AWQC for Organics in
           Lower Newfields Ditch Sediments                                               39

   11      Distribution of Metals Exceeding NOAA ER-Ls in Lower Newfields
           Ditch Sediments                                                               40

   12      Estimated Areal Extent of Potential Remediation in Pauls Brook                56

   13      Estimated Areal Extent of Sediments Exceeding Cleanup Goals in
           Mclntyre Brook                                                                58

   14      Sample Locations Exceeding Cleanup Goals for Both Lead and Total
           PAHs in Mclntyre Brook Sediments                                              60

-------
                                         DECLARATION

SITE NAME AND LOCATION

Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, Lower Newfields Ditch, Pease Air Force Base
(Pease AFB),  Rockingham County, New Hampshire

STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE

This Record of Decision (ROD) presents a selected remedial action designed to protect human and
ecological receptors in various brooks and ditches at Pease AFB, NH. The Pease AFB brooks and ditches
included in this document are as follows: Flagstone Brook  (Zone 1), Pauls Brook  (Zone 1), Mclntyre Brook
(Zone 3),  and Lower Newfields Ditch  (Zone 3). This ROD was developed in accordance with the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act  (CERCLA)  (42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et. seg.)  as
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act  (SARA) of 1996, and the National Contingency
Plan (NCP) (40 CFR Part 300). Through this document, the Air Force plans to remedy the threat to public
health, public welfare, or the environment posed by contaminated sediment associated with Pauls Brook and
Mclntyre Brook. This decision is based on the Administrative Record for the surface water bodies. The
Administrative Record for Pease AFB is located at the Information Repository at 61 International Drive,
Building 43,  at Pease AFB. The Administrative Record Index as it applies to Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook,
Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch is provided in Appendix D.

The State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES)  concurs with the selected remedy.

ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE

Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook sediment,  if
not addressed by implementing the response action selected in the ROD, may present an imminent and
substantial endangerment to public health, public welfare, or the environment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY

The selected remedy will protect public health, public welfare, and the environment by removing
contaminated sediments that pose a potential threat to ecological receptors from direct contact with, or
ingestion of the contaminated sediment.

The selected remedy includes the excavation  of sediment associated with Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook.
The excavated sediment will be treated and/or disposed of off base at an asphalt batching facility,  a
Subtitle D landfill, or a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA)  transportation, storage, and
disposal  (TSD) facility, as deemed necessary at the time of remediation. The selected remedy also
includes sedimentation and erosion control during excavation, restoration of wetlands impacted or
destroyed by sediment excavation at Pauls Brook, and long-term environmental monitoring at Pauls Brook
and Mclntyre Brook.

The Air Force has determined that no action  is necessary under CERCLA to ensure the protection of human
health and the environment at Flagstone Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch.

STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS

The selected remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with federal and state
reguirements that are legally applicable or  relevant and appropriate to the remedial action, and is
cost-effective. This remedy uses permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the
maximum extent practicable. No actions are necessary under CERCLA to ensure the protection of human
health and the environment at Flagstone Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch.

The foregoing represents the selection of a  remedial action by the Air Force and EPA New England, with
concurrence of NHDES.

EPA New England,

Concur and recommended for immediate implementation:

-------
RECORD OF DECISION SUMMARY

I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION

The former Pease Air Force Base (AFB) is a National Priorities List (NPL) site consisting of numerous
areas of contamination. The former base is located in the Town of Newington and the City of Portsmouth,
both of which are in Rockingham County, NH. As shown in Figure 1, Pease AFB occupies approximately 4,365
acres on a peninsula in southeastern New Hampshire. The peninsula is bounded on the west and southwest by
Great Bay, on the northwest by Little Bay, and on the north and northeast by the Piscatagua River.

This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses sources of contamination in various surface water bodies at Pease
AFB. Flagstone Brook and Pauls Brook are located within the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) Zone 1
on the northeastern side of the former Pease AFB. Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch are located
within IRP Zone 3, in the central portion of the former base. These surface water bodies have been
investigated under the Air Force IRP. The results of field investigations indicated that past activities
in Zone 1 and Zone 3 have contributed to surface water and sediment contamination in these surface water
bodies. Although these surface water bodies are physically located in Zones 1 and 3, they are being
summarized in this report separately from the Zone 1 and 3 RODs. Because several issues regarding surface
water and sediment were raised by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) regarding surface water and sediment, these areas were
separated from Zones 1 and 3 so as not to delay actions in those zones.

At the beginning of World War II, an airport at the present Pease AFB location was used by the U.S. Navy.
The Air Force assumed control of the site in 1951, and construction of the facility was completed in
1956. Over time, various guantities of fuels, oils, solvents, lubricants, and protective coatings were
used at the base, and releases of contaminants into the environment occurred.

In December 1988, Pease AFB was selected as one of 86 military installations to be closed by the
Secretary of Defense's Commission on Base Realignment and Closure. The base was closed as an active
military reservation on 31 March 1991. The New Hampshire Air National Guard (NHANG) remains at the air
field and uses some of the existing facilities. The remainder of the reservation has been divided among
the U.S. Department of the Interior through an intergovernmental conveyance, the State of New Hampshire's
Pease Development Authority (PDA) in the form of a long-term lease (in anticipation of a deeded transfer
in the future), and the Air Force.

The current land uses at the former Pease AFB are institutional, woodland, agricultural, abandoned land,
and residential (currently unoccupied). Commercial and residential areas are located off base along
Spaulding Turnpike, approximately 1,000 feet northeast of the Pease AFB eastern boundary, and Interstate
1-95, which is located along the southeastern base boundary. The largest commercial complex is a shopping
mall located on the eastern side of Spaulding Turnpike.

Flagstone Brook, the primary stream draining Zone 1, originates from two culverts at the northern end of
the North Ramp/aircraft parking apron (see Figure 2). The western culvert drains stormwater from an area
of approximately 20 acres, which includes the North Ramp/aircraft parking apron and the Hot Cargo Holding
Pad. From this culvert, stormwater flows north to Flagstone Brook approximately 600 feet downstream. The
eastern culvert drains stormwater from a portion of the North Ramp, the taxiway, the indoor firing range,
a small area of industrial buildings, and Nashua Avenue. The total drainage area of the stormwater
collection system within the headwaters of Flagstone Brook is approximately 78 acres. Below the
confluence of the eastern and western branches, Flagstone Brook flows north along the western edge of
Landfill 5 (LF-5). Surface runoff and groundwater discharge from LF-5 also contribute to flow in
Flagstone Brook. Flagstone Brook eventually empties into the Piscatagua River near the General Sullivan
Bridge.

Pauls Brook is located in the northeastern part of Pease AFB (see Figure 2). The stream begins west of
Arboretum Drive near the Bulk Fuel Storage Area (BFSA) as an emergent wetland dominated by cattails
(Typha latifolia) and flows eastward under Arboretum Drive off base toward the Piscatagua River. East of
Arboretum Drive, the stream flows through a poorly drained forested area. The majority of the habitat
east of Arboretum Drive consists of forested wetland. Based on review of a stormwater drainage map for
Pease AFB, it appears that Pauls Brook also receives stormwater runoff from the BFSA, the engineering
maintenance area, and a former mobile home park. Drainage from these areas discharges into Pauls Brook
near station 8040. Stormwater runoff from the engineering maintenance area is discharged into Pauls Brook
from the storm sewer system.

-------
Mclntyre Brook, a channelized drainage, is located on the southwestern side of Pease AFB (see Figure 3)
and begins at a storm sewer discharge point. This storm sewer receives stormwater runoff from much of the
flight apron and runway. Overburden groundwater infiltration is known to occur into the sewer system.
Immediately after leaving the storm sewer, water is diverted to an oil/water separator located at the
headwaters of Mclntyre Brook and is subseguently discharged into the main channel. In addition to water
discharged from the storm sewer system, Mclntyre Brook receives water contributions from wetland
drainage, agricultural runoff, and groundwater discharge along its upper reach (i.e., east of Mclntyre
Road). This portion of Mclntyre Brook is outside of the Pease AFB property boundary. Mclntyre Brook flows
in a southwesterly direction for approximately 0.8 mile before discharging into Great Bay.

Newfields Ditch is a manmade drainage ditch that extends from Building 222 (Site 34) eastward to Hodgsons
Brook (see Figure 4). It receives surface runoff and groundwater discharge from areas cast of the
aircraft parking apron that include Buildings 222 and 227 and the adjacent parking apron. The eastern
portion of Newfields Ditch is known as Lower Newfields Ditch. The western portion of Newfields Ditch,
known as Upper Newfields Ditch, was included in the Zone 3 ROD. Lower Newfields Ditch begins just east of
Portsmouth Avenue near station 8140 and ends near station 802 where it leaves the base. Newfields Ditch
ultimately discharges into the Piscatagua River.

A more detailed description of the surface water bodies, including local geology and hydrogeology, is
presented in the Draft Final Zone 1 Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (G-623) and the Draft Final Zone 3
RI Report (G-629).

II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

A. Zone Use and Response History

Past Zone 1 and Zone 3 activities have contributed to surface water and sediment contamination in
Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch. Flagstone Brook and Pauls Brook
receive surface water runoff and groundwater discharge from Zone 1, while Mclntyre Brook and Lower
Newfields Ditch receive surface water runoff and groundwater discharge from Zone 3. The history of Zones
1 and 3, as well as the surface water bodies within these zones, is discussed in this subsection. More
detailed information may be found in Section 2 of the Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623) and Section 2
of the Draft Final Zone 3 RI Report (G-629).

Zone 1

Historic land use in Zone 1 included waste disposal at Landfill 2 (LF-2), Landfill 4 (LF-4), LF-5, and
the Paint Can Disposal Area (PCDA) and fuel storage and transfer at the BFSA. LF-2 and LF-4 were used for
the disposal of domestic and industrial solid waste generated at the base from 1960 to 1964. LF-5 was
used as the primary base landfill from 1964 to 1975. Domestic and industrial refuse reportedly disposed
of in the landfill included waste oils and solvents, paints, paint stripers and thinners, pesticide
containers, and empty cans and drums. The landfill also received an estimated 20,000 gallons of sludge
from the industrial waste treatment plant. The BFSA has been in operation from 1953 to the present. Major
spills of petroleum products, have occurred at this site in 1963, 1975, and 1980. The PCDA was reportedly
used by both the Air Force and contract painters over a 30-year period to store and dispose of drums that
contained paint and paint residues.

Flagstone Brook is the primary stream draining Zone 1. The brook receives surface water runoff from the
North Ramp/aircraft parking apron, the Hot Cargo Holding Pad, the taxiway, the indoor firing range,
Nashua Avenue, and LF-5. Groundwater discharge from LF-5 also contributes to flow in Flagstone Brook.
Flagstone Brook has undergone anthropogenic changes in stream morphology resulting from past base
construction activities and the development and use of LF-5. Pauls Brook, a small stream located in the
southeastern portion of Zone 1, receives surface water runoff from the BFSA, the engineering maintenance
area, and the mobile home park.

Zone 3

Most of the repair and maintenance of aircraft and related eguipment occurred at facilities along the
flightline in Zone 3. As a result, Zone 3 has been an area of numerous small fuel spills, spent solvent
and waste oil spills, discharges of shop-generated wastes into storm drains, and suspected underground
storage tank (UST) leaks. Fuels, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, and JP-4, and solvents, such as
trichloroethene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), tetrachloroethene (PCE), carbon tetrachloride,
and stoddard solvent (PD-680) , were in common use at Zone 3 sites.

-------
Newfields, Ditch is a manmade drainage ditch that extends from Building 222 in Zone 3 eastward to
Hodgsons Brook. The ditch receives surface runoff from areas east of the aircraft parking apron. Mclntyre
Brook is a natural stream, altered during base airfield construction, that flows westward from the runway
out to Great Bay. The brook received outflow from the storm drain system, which collects most of the
runoff from the flightline. Wastewater from the Building 227 floor drains also flowed into the flightline
storm drain system that feeds into Mclntyre Brook until 1974, when a bypass line was constructed.

B. Enforcement History

The enforcement history relative to Pease AFB, including Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook,
and Lower Newfields Ditch, is summarized as follows:

• In 1976, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) devised a comprehensive IRP to assess and
control environmental contamination that may have resulted from past operations and disposal
practices at DOD facilities.

• In June 1980, DOD issued a Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy Memorandum (DEQPPM)
reguiring identification of past hazardous waste disposal sites on DOD agency installations.
The DEQPPM was issued in response to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of
1976, and in anticipation of CERCLA.

On 14 July 1989, Pease AFB was proposed for addition to the NPL. The effective date of
addition was February 1990.

On 24 April 1991, the Air Force, EPA, and NHDES signed a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA)
establishing the protocol and timetable for conducting the remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and remedial design/remedial action processes at
Pease AFB.

As part of the timetable established in the FFA, the Air Force, in an effort to streamline activities,
designed a Basewide Strategy Plan for conducting an RI/FS investigation. This Strategy Plan grouped the
sites at Pease AFB into seven zones or operable units based on geographic location, potential receptors,
and potential future uses. RI/FS reports were prepared for each zone. As previously mentioned, the brooks
and ditches addressed in this document, although physically located in Zones 1 and 3, were separated from
the Zone 1 and Zone 3 RI/FS process so as not to delay actions in those zones. A separate Brooks/Ditches
RI/FS Consolidated Report was prepared to address surface water and sediment in Flagstone Brook, Pauls
Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch (G-805).

III. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

Throughout the history of IRP activities at Pease AFB, the local community has been actively involved and
informed. EPA, NHDES, and the Air Force have kept the community and other interested parties apprised of
zone activities through informational meetings, fact sheets, press releases, and public meetings.

In January 1991, the Air Force released a community relations plan that outlined a program to address
community concerns and keep citizens informed about and involved in remedial activities at the base. This
plan was updated and reissued in November 1994.

Numerous fact sheets have been released by the Air Force throughout the IRP at Pease AFB. These fact
sheets are intended to keep public and other concerned parties apprised of developments and milestones in
the Pease IRP. The fact sheets released to date that concern Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre
Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch are summarized as follows:

Fact Sheet Release Date

Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update October 1991
Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update December 1992
Proposed Plan for Brooks/Ditches Source Areas February 1997

A complete information repository containing documents relating to the Pease AFB IRP is maintained at
Pease AFB in Building 43. The Administrative Record, containing correspondence pertaining to the Pease
AFB, IRP, also is located in Building 43 at Pease AFB. An index of the Administrative Record is
maintained at EPA New England in Boston, MA.

-------
IV. SCOPE AND ROIiE OF OPERABLE UNIT OR RESPONSE ACTION

This ROD addresses only source control measures at Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks. The actions being taken in
these areas are compatible with other actions being taken or planned at other zones or areas of Pease
AFB. The remedial alternatives developed for Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks were designed to reduce potential
environmental risks identified in the ecological risk assessment for these surface water bodies. The
results of the human health and ecological risk assessments, which are presented in the Draft Final
Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805) and are summarized in Section VI of this ROD, form the
basis for concluding that contaminants in surface water and sediment at Flagstone Brook and Lower
Newfields Ditch do not pose an unacceptable risk (current or future) to human and ecological receptors to
reguire remedial actions under CERCLA. For this reason, no further action is warranted for these sites
under CERCLA. Environmental monitoring will be conducted at Flagstone Brook as part of the long-term
environmental reguirements for the Landfill 5 source area and Zone 1 remedial actions.

The selected remedy was developed to reduce potential risks posed to ecological receptors from direct
contact with contaminated sediment in Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook. It is expected that removal of the
sediment will, in conjunction with other source area actions conducted in Zone 1 and Zone 3, help improve
surface water guality in the brooks. In summary, the remedy provides for the following tasks:

• Excavation of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook and
off-base treatment and/or disposal.

• Sedimentation and erosion control during sediment excavation.

• Restoration of wetlands impacted or destroyed by sediment excavation at Pauls Brook.

• No further action for Lower Newfields Ditch and Flagstone Brook.

• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.

• Long-term environmental monitoring in Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks.

V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS

Table 1 presents a summary of investigative reports for Flagstone and Pauls Brooks (Zone 1) and Mclntyre
Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch (Zone 3). Based on the results of the RIs, a working conceptual model was
developed that incorporates all known data concerning each zone and its vicinity, including geological,
hydrogeological, and analytical data; field measurements; and visual observations. The significant
findings of the RIs that are relevant to the surface water bodies are presented in this section.

A. Surface Water Hydrology

Pease AFB is located on a peninsula within the Piscatagua River drainage basin. Drainage is radially away
from the peninsula, toward Great Bay to the west, Little Bay to the northwest and north, and the
Piscatagua River to the east. Great Bay, Little Bay, and the Piscatagua River are all tidally influenced,
and are, conseguently, subjected to semidiurnal variation in water levels.

The peninsula is of relatively low relief,,with the runway and aircraft parking apron in Zone 3 located
along the high point of the peninsula. A surface drainage divide is located along the northeastern side
of the aircraft parking apron, with runoff to the northeast of the divide draining toward the Piscatagua
River and runoff southwest of the divide draining toward Great Bay.

Flagstone Brook is the primary stream draining Zone 1. Approximately 75% of Zone 1 is drained by
Flagstone Brook and the Railway Ditch. Flagstone Brook originates from two culverts at the northern end
of the North Ramp/aircraft parking apron. The western culvert drains stormwater from an area of
approximately 20 acres, which includes the North Ramp/aircraft parking apron and the Hot Cargo Holding
Pad. From this culvert, stormwater flows north to Flagstone Brook approximately 600 feet downstream. The
eastern culvert drains stormwater from a portion of the North Ramp, the taxiway, the indoor firing range,
a small area of industrial buildings, and Nashua Avenue. The total drainage area of the stormwater
collection system within the headwaters of Flagstone Brook is approximately 78 acres. Below the
confluence of the eastern and western branches, Flagstone Brook flows north along the western edge of
LF-5. Surface runoff and groundwater discharge from LF-5 also contribute to flow in Flagstone Brook.
Flagstone Brook eventually empties into the Piscatagua River near the General Sullivan Bridge.

Flagstone Brook is essentially a channelized drainage ditch with relatively uniform steep banks and
uniform gradient, and contains a series of weir dams constructed for erosion and flood control. During

-------
the June 1991 field investigations, the average stream depth was approximately 0.75 foot and the average
stream width was approximately 9 feet. The substrate for most of Flagstone Brook is sand, cobble, and
gravel; however, areas of silt and clay exist. Water velocity averaged approximately 0.2 ft/sec during
the June 1991 investigations.

Pauls Brook begins west of Arboretum Drive near the BFSA as an emergent wetland dominated by cattails and
flows eastward under Arboretum Drive off base toward the Piscatagua River. East of Arboretum Drive the
stream flows through a poorly drained forested wetland area. Pauls Brook also receives stormwater runoff
from the BFSA, the engineering maintenance area, and the mobile home park. Drainage from these areas
discharges into Pauls Brook near station 8040. Stormwater runoff from the engineering maintenance area is
discharged into Pauls Brook from the storm sewer system. Pauls Brook is a relatively small stream with a
flow velocity of less than 0.5 ft/sec as measured in June 1991. The stream bed ranges from 0.8 to 3.8
feet wide and 0.1 to 0.3 foot deep. Mclntyre Brook, a channelized drainage, begins at a storm sewer
discharge point. This storm sewer receives stormwater runoff from much of the flight apron and runway. In
addition, overburden groundwater infiltration into the sewer system is known to occur. Immediately after
leaving the storm sewer, water is diverted to an oil/water separator located at the headwaters of
Mclntyre Brook and is subseguently discharged into the main channel.

Mclntyre Brook flows in a southwesterly direction for approximately 0.8 mile before discharging into
Great Bay. Along its course, four weirs have been constructed to regulate water flow; sediment catch
basins are positioned below each weir. Sampling stations 812, 8078, 8077, and 8076 (see Figure 3) are
located at these weirs. In addition to water discharged from the storm sewer system, Mclntyre Brook
receives water contributions from wetland drainage, agricultural runoff, and groundwater discharge along
its upper reach (i.e., east of Mclntyre Road). This portion of Mclntyre Brook is outside the Pease AFB
property boundary.

Because of its channelization, Mclntyre Brook has a relatively consistent width (10 to 15 feet); water
depth and velocity appear relatively constant, with moderate fluctuations during storms, and moderate
variations along the length of the brook. For example, during an intensive sampling effort in June 1991,
Mclntyre Brook water depth ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 foot deep, and flow velocity ranged from 0.09 to 0.18
ft/sec along its entire length. A detailed discussion of the general physical/chemical conditions of the
surface waters in Mclntyre Brook is presented in the Drainage Area Letter Report (G-570).

The substrate of Mclntyre Brook changes from upstream to downstream. Upstream, Mclntyre Brook has a
relatively compacted, clay base with little apparent sediment deposition occurring. Deposition in the
sediment catch basins is limited to gravel-sized materials. Below the last catch basin near station 8076,
sediment composition becomes fine- grained (i.e., predominantly silt and sand) until reaching the culvert
under Mclntyre Road. Below Mclntyre Road, the substrate reverts back to a clay hardpan, until changing to
gravel near Great Bay. The observed lack of uniformity in sediment characteristics along Mclntyre Brook
appears to be the result of past channelization and the addition of weirs and sediment catch basins.

Newfields Ditch is a manmade drainage ditch that extends from Building 222 (Site 34) eastward to Hodgsons
Brook. It receives surface runoff and groundwater discharge from areas cast of the aircraft parking apron
that include Buildings 222 and 227 and the adjacent parking apron. Newfields Ditch originates in and
flows through a forested wetland area north of Building 222 near the edge of the aircraft parking apron.
It flows in a northeasterly direction toward Dover Avenue, passes through a culvert under Dover Avenue,
and subseguently converges with flow from a channel that drains the central and eastern portion of Site
32/36. As it leaves the Site 32/36 area, the surface water in Newfields, Ditch flows into a culvert that
connects into the storm sewer network for Rochester and Portsmouth Avenues. Storm sewer flow joins the
Newfields Ditch flow as it passes underground along Newfields Street before emerging east of Portsmouth
Avenue.

The eastern portion of Newfields Ditch is known as Lower Newfields Ditch. Lower Newfields Ditch begins
just east of Portsmouth Avenue near station 8140, joins Hodgsons Brook near the recreational baseball
field, passes through a wet meadow area, and eventually leaves the base near station 802, as it passes
under the Spaulding Turnpike. Between Portsmouth Avenue and the convergence with Hodgsons Brook,
Newfields Ditch passes into a second culvert near Building 56, which is connected into the Concord Avenue
storm sewer system, before emerging in the former residential section of the base east of Concord Avenue.
Newfields Ditch ultimately discharges into the Piscatagua River.

Newfields Ditch has an average width of approximately 2 feet and an average depth of approximately 0.5
foot; however, several pools along its length are up to 2 feet deep. Near station 802, the ditch consists
of several subchannels. The width of Newfields Ditch near station 802 ranges from 6 to 10 feet, depending
on flow conditions. Flow velocity for most of the lower portion is less than 1 ft/sec. In general, the
substrate of Lower Newfields Ditch is a mixture of gravel and sand, with local area that exhibit a high
clay and silt content.

-------
B. Surface Water/Sediment Sources

This subsection identifies potential sources of the organic and inorganic compounds detected in the
surface water and sediment of Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch.
Tables 2 through 14 present summaries of the highest concentrations of organic compounds and metals
detected in the surface water and sediment samples collected from these surface water bodies. Potential
sources of the detected organic and inorganic compounds include:

• Historic application of pesticides in wetland areas.
• Groundwater baseflow into the surface water drainages.
• Runoff from storms.
• Past disposal of pesticide liguids into the storm sewer system from the Civil
Engineering (CE) Department complex.
• Leaching of compounds from sediment into surface water.

Flagstone Brook

The sampling locations used to characterize Flagstone Brook include, from upstream to downstream, 8031,
8106, 821, 821A, 819, 819A, 818, and 818A (see Figure 2). Surface runoff from the North Ramp and LF-5,
potentially affect all sampling locations within the Flagstone drainage. A summary of the highest
concentrations detected of organic compounds and total metals in Flagstone Brook surface water samples is
presented in Table 2. Low concentrations of VOCs were present at two stream sampling locations (821 and
821A). Concentrations of VOCs did not exceed NHDES ambient water guality criteria (AWQC) in any Flagstone
Brook surface water samples. Figure 5 presents the distribution of VOCs in surface water. Four pesticides
and 15 metals also were detected in Flagstone Brook surface water samples.

Sediment contaminant concentrations were compared with biological effects range-low (ER-L) numerical
effect-based, sediment guality guidelines developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA). The ER-L and effects range-medium (ER-M) represent two concentrations for an
individual contaminant with respect to the incidence of adverse biological effects (i.e., increase in
mortality, decrease in growth and reproduction). Contaminant concentrations below the ER-L represent a
range of concentrations in which biological effects would seldom be observed. Contaminant concentrations
egual to the ER-L or greater and below the ER-M represent a concentration range in which possible
biological effects would occasionally occur. The probable effects range in which biological effects would
freguently occur is identified with contaminant concentrations egual to or greater than the ER-M. ER-L
and ER-M values are presented in Table 4 for comparison. Because ER-L and ER-M values are based primarily
on studies conducted in estuarine environments, or with organisms typically found in estuarine settings,
and because the brooks and ditches at Zone 1 are freshwater ditches, the eguilibrium partitioning (EgP)
approach also was used to evaluate the bioavailability of nonionic organic contaminants. The EgP approach
is used to generate sediment guality criteria or ecotoxicological benchmarks for predicting contaminant
concentrations in interstitial water (pore water), the exposure pathway for benthic invertebrates. A
complete discussion of the EgP approach is contained in Appendix B of the Zone 1 FS Report (G-622).

A summary of the highest detected concentrations and a comparison to background concentrations and EgP
interstitial water concentrations for nonionic organic compounds detected in Flagstone Brook sediment
samples are presented in Table 3. A summary of the highest concentrations of metals detected is presented
in Table 4. Figure 6 presents the distribution of organic compounds in sediment samples whose EgP
interstitial water concentrations exceed chronic AWQC. Those organic compounds whose EgP interstitial
water concentrations exceed chronic AWQC include anthracene (EgP=3.14/AWQC=2.00) , napthalene
(EgP=942/AWQC=620), phenanthrene (EgP=7.65/AWQC=6.32), pyrene (EgP=3.10/AWQC=0.4), and4,4-DDT
(EgP=0.013/AWQC=0.001).

Semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were reported from all Flagstone Brook sediment sampling
locations, except for location 821. SVOCs present in the Flagstone Brook sediments included polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, phenols, benzoic acid, and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs).
The highest total PAH concentration was detected in the sample collected from location 8031 (11.82
mg/kg) , located in a Flagstone Brook headwater tributary just north of the North Ramp. The highest
concentrations of PAHs in Flagstone Brook sediment were detected at station 8031. This station is the
most upgradient station and is located adjacent to the North Ramp. Runoff from the North Ramp is directed
to Flagstone Brook via a 3-foot-diameter pipe that receives overland runoff from the North Ramp area. The
runoff is considered to be a nonpoint source.

-------
Pesticides were detected in five Flagstone Brook sediment samples. The pesticides detected at
concentrations above background (the analytical detection limit) were 4, 4'-DDT, 4, 4'-ODD, and 4, 4'-DDE.
The highest concentrations were observed at locations 819 (4,4'-DDD=0.21 mg/kg and 4,4'-DDE=0.12 mg/kg)
and 819A (4, 4'-DDT=0.035 mg/kg). Pesticide concentrations in Flagstone Brook are representative of
basewide conditions at Pease AFB as a result of routine pesticide use in accordance with standards for
licensed application. Low levels of 4,4-DDT and its breakdown products (ODD and DDE) have been detected
in streams throughout Pease AFB and are the result of general area pesticide use rather than a specific
spill or release. More information on this topic is presented in the Pesticides in Sediment Data Review
Letter Report (G-797).

Thirteen metals exceeded background sediment concentrations at Flagstone Brook sediment sampling
locations. Metals concentrations above background were observed along the entire reach of Flagstone
Brook. Figure 7 presents the distribution of metals in Zone 1 sediment that exceed ER-L guidelines.

Pauls Brook

Four sampling locations (8039, 8040, 8041, and 813) located in the braided channel system of Pauls Brook
were used to characterize Pauls Brook surface water and sediment (see Figure 2). In addition, four
sediment samples were collected from outside the Pauls Brook channel in February 1996 (S001, S002, S003,
and S004) and 18 sediment samples in the vicinity of Pauls Brook (S005 through S022) in May 1996, which
were also used to characterize contaminant levels in Pauls Brook. A summary of the highest concentrations
of organic compounds and total metals detected in Pauls Brook surface water samples is presented in Table
5. Although VOCs and SVOCs were not detected above chronic AWQC in Pauls Brook surface water samples
during the earthworm sampling, signs of previously uncharacterized petroleum contamination were found
within the Pauls Brook drainage, including a strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor and a sheen on the water
and sediments. The only metals whose concentrations exceeded AWQC were zinc, iron, and aluminum. Aluminum
did not exceed the maximum detected background concentration. Two pesticides (chlordane and 4,4'-ODD)
were also detected at levels above AWQC.

A summary of the highest detected concentrations and a comparison to background concentrations and EgP
interstitial water concentrations for organic compounds detected in Pauls Brook sediment samples are
presented in Table 6. Maximum concentrations for metals are presented in Table 7. PAHs were detected
above background in Pauls Brook sediment samples. Eighteen metals exceeded background at one or more
Pauls Brook sediment sampling locations. With the exception of aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, boron,
manganese, potassium, and selenium, the maximum concentration for each metal was detected in a sample
collected from location 8039.

The pesticide compounds 4,4'-DDT, 4,4'-ODD, 4,4'-DDE, heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, and alpha-and
gamma-chlordane were detected in Pauls Brook sediment samples. Calculated interstitial water
concentrations for pesticides in sediment were above chronic AWQC at all four Pauls Brook sampling
locations. Interstitial water concentrations for 4,4'-ODD and both alpha- and gamma-chlordane were above
AWQC at all locations, with the exception of location 8041.

Pesticides detected in Pauls Brook may be the result of routine pesticide use in this area or from past
operational activities at the nearby Civil Engineering (CE) Department complex that were transported to
Pauls Brook through the storm sewer. The likely mechanism for release of pesticides from the CE
Department complex is believed to be past disposal of pesticide liguids via a storm drain during
pesticide mixing activities or pesticide eguipment washdown activities. Pesticide mixing activities are
no longer conducted in the CE Department complex. Because the drainage route connecting the complex to
Pauls Brook is composed of buried hard pipe for the entire route, no deposition of pesticides on route to
Pauls Brook is believed to have occurred. Runoff from the BFSA, where past fuel spills and leaking
storage tanks have contaminated soil and groundwater, is the likely source responsible for fuel related
contamination found in Pauls Brook.

Mclntyre Brook

Surface water and sediment samples were collected at 11 stations within the Mclntyre Brook drainage area.
These stations, from upstream to downstream, are 8060, 8059, 811, 812, 8058, 8078, 8077, 8076, 8057,
8075, and 8056 (see Figure 3). A summary of the highest detected concentrations in Mclntyre Brook surface
water is presented in Table 8. Summaries of the highest detected concentrations of organic and inorganic
contaminants in Mclntyre Brook sediment are presented in Tables 9 and 10, respectively.

The following discussion of the observed distribution of contaminants in Mclntyre Brook focuses on those
chemicals that were present at concentrations above established background concentrations and/or were
included as chemicals of concern (COCs) in the risk assessment.

-------
Two organic compounds, cis-,2-dichloroethene (DCE) and TCE, were detected in surface water samples
collected in the Mclntyre Brook drainage area. TCE was detected at five stations in the upper portion of
Mclntyre Brook from station 8060 (1 Ig/L in 1991) downstream to station 8058 (0.7J Ig/L in 1991). The
highest detected concentrations of TCE were observed at station 812 (2.9 Ig/L in 1988 and 2.7 Ig/L in
1989) just upstream of the Pease AFB boundary. DCE was only detected at station 8076, located off base,
at a concentration of 0.2 Ig/L.

Mercury was the only metal detected in Mclntyre Brook surface water at concentrations above background
that also exceeded the NHDES freshwater chronic criteria. Mercury was detected at one station (811) in
1988 at a concentration of 0.29 Ig/L; mercury was not detected at that or any other station during
subseguent sampling events.

Six inorganic analytes (arsenic, calcium, magnesium, silicon, potassium, and zinc) were detected in
Mclntyre Brook surface water at concentrations above the respective background concentrations. Calcium
and magnesium were present at concentrations above background at eight stations, and silicon at nine
stations. These three inorganic analytes were detected throughout Mclntyre Brook with no apparent trend
in concentrations. Zinc and potassium also were detected at concentrations that exceeded the background
concentration, but only at station 811 in 1988. Arsenic was detected above the background concentration
at station 812 in 1988.

Five VOCs, 20 SVOCs, and 2 pesticides were detected in sediments collected from the Mclntyre Brook
drainage area. Figure 8 presents the distribution of calculated EgP values that exceed AWQC for organic
compounds in sediment samples. Each of the five VOCs was detected at one station during one sampling
event: 1,2-dichlorobenzene at station 812 (170 J Ig/kg in 1988), benzyl alcohol at station 8059 (180 J
Ig/kg in 1991), chlorobenzene at station 8075 (6 J Ig/kg in 1991), methylene chloride at station 811 (10
Ig/kg in 1988) , and toluene at station 8057 (43 mg/kg in 1991) . Methylene chloride and toluene are common
laboratory contaminants, and their presence in these two samples potentially represents an artifact of
analytical procedures.

SVOCs were detected in sediment samples collected throughout Mclntyre Brook, from the upper reach at
station 8060 downstream to station 8056. SVOCs present in the Mclntyre Brook sediments included mainly
PAHs, The highest PAH concentrations (78.4 mg/kg at station 8059) were found in samples from the upper
reaches of Mclntyre Brook east of Mclntyre Road. Many of these compounds were detected at concentrations
above those detected in background samples.

The herbicide 2,4-D and pesticide 4,4-DDD were detected at one station each in Mclntyre Brook sediments;
2,4-D was detected at a concentration of 52 J Ig/kg at station 811 in 1989, and 4,4-DDD was detected at a
concentration of 2.2 J Ig/kg in 1991. Low levels of 4,4'-DDT and its breakdown products (ODD and DDE)
have been detected in streams throughout Pease AFB and are a result of general historic pesticide use
rather than a specific spill or release.

Sixteen metals were detected in sediment samples from Mclntyre Brook at concentrations above established
background concentrations: aluminum, arsenic, barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron,
lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, thallium, vanadium, and zinc, which were detected throughout the
upper and central reaches of the stream. In general, the highest detected concentrations of these metals
were observed at stations 812, 811, and 8058, all of which are located inside the base boundary. Figure 9
presents the distribution of metals in Mclntyre Brook sediments that exceed NOAA ER-L guidelines.

Lower Newfields Ditch

Surface water and sediment samples were collected and analyzed from three stations in the Lower Newfields
Ditch drainage from 1988 to 1992. These stations, from upstream to downstream, are 8140, 803, and 802
(see Figure 4). A summary of the highest detected concentrations of organics and total metals in Lower
Newfields Ditch surface water is presented in Table 11. Summaries of the highest detected concentrations
of organic and inorganic compounds in Lower Newfields Ditch sediment are presented in Tables 12 and 13,
respectively. The following discussion of the observed distribution of contaminants in Lower Newfields
Ditch focuses on those chemicals that were present at concentrations above established background
concentrations and were included as COCs in the risk assessment.

Five organic compounds were detected in surface water samples collected either at station 802 or 803 in
the Lower Newfields Ditch drainage. Three VOCs (chlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and methylene
chloride) and two pesticides (DDT and heptachlor epoxide) were detected. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene,
chlorobenzene, and DDT were detected at station 802, and heptachlor epoxide and methylene chloride were
detected at station 803. Since methylene chloride is a common laboratory contaminant, and is not known to

-------
be associated with IRP sites that potentially discharge into Newfields Ditch, its presence is likely a
result of laboratory contamination.

Eight metals were detected in surface water samples from Lower Newfields Ditch at concentrations above
established background concentrations (cadmium, calcium, copper, nickel, selenium, silicon, sodium, and
zinc). The highest concentrations of most of the metals were detected at station 803. The only inorganics
detected at concentrations above background at station 8140 (the farthest upgradient sampling location)
were calcium, silicon, and sodium.

Thirteen SVOCs were detected in sediment samples from Lower Newfields Ditch, the majority of which were
present at concentrations above background levels. In general, the distribution of SVOCs in Lower
Newfields Ditch was relatively constant, with nine SVOCs observed at station 8140, eight at station 802,
and seven at station 803. Figure 10 presents the distribution of calculated EgP values for organic
compounds in Lower Newfields Ditch sediment samples that exceeded AWQC.

Four pesticides (alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane, 4,4'-DDT, and 4,4'-ODD) were detected in sediment
samples from Lower Newfields Ditch. Alpha- and gamma-chlordane were detected at station 802 (1991) , DDT
was detected at stations 803 (1988 and 1991) and 802 (1991), and ODD was detected at stations 803 and 802
(1988 and 1991). No pesticides were detected in sediment samples collected at station 8140 (the farthest
upgradient sampling location).

Nine metals were detected in sediment samples from Lower Newfields Ditch at concentrations above the
maximum background concentrations. Arsenic, beryllium, copper, lead, manganese, thallium, vanadium, and
zinc were present above background concentrations during one or more sampling rounds only at station 802
C the farthest downstream sampling location. Barium, the only other inorganic present above background
concentrations, was detected above background concentrations at stations 8140 and 802. Figure 11 presents
the distribution of metals in Lower Newfields Ditch sediments that exceed NOAA ER-L guidelines.

VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS

Baseline human health and ecological risk assessments were performed for the various media at Flagstone
Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch, and are presented in Section 6 of the
Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623) and Section 4 of the Draft Final Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields
Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618). The risk assessments were performed to evaluate the potential adverse risks
posed to human and ecological receptors by exposure to zone-related contaminants. The risk assessments
are intended to provide information that can be used to determine whether a remedial action is needed in
each surface water body.

The approach and methodology for preparing the risk assessment were originally presented in a protocols
document submitted to EPA New England and NHDES (G-568). This document was subseguently amended based on
a meeting among WESTON, the Air Force, EPA New England, and NHDES (G-217) , and a revised version was
submitted (G-601).

The baseline risk assessment is divided into three main subsections:

• Data Evaluation and Reduction
• Human Health Risk Assessment
• Ecological Risk Assessment

These subsections are presented in the Zone 1 RI Report and the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch
RI/FS Report and are described briefly in the subsections that follow.

A. Data Evaluation and Reduction

The objectives of the data evaluation and reduction are to review and summarize the analytical data for
each medium and to select the COCs to be evaluated in the risk assessment. The reviewed data include
sampling results for surface water and sediment collected during Stages 2, 3, and 4 of the IRP and data
from sediment toxicity tests. The chemicals analyzed in each medium consist of SVOCs,
pesticides/polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), VOCs, and inorganics (metals).

A preliminary data summary was performed on all media data sets. The guidelines followed in
preparation of the data summary are explained in detail in Subsection 6.2.1 of the Draft Final Zone 1 RI
Report (G-623) and Subsection 4.2.1 of the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618).

-------
Based on the preliminary data summary, approximately 25 to 30 COCs for sediment and 8 to 15 COCs for
surface water were selected using the following criteria. A chemical was eliminated as a COG when:

• The chemical was detected in fewer than 5% of the samples and was not reported at high
concentrations based on professional judgment (G-189; G-217).

• The chemical was not detected at a concentration above background concentrations. Only
inorganic chemicals were eliminated as COCs based on a comparison with background. Although
no organic chemicals were eliminated based on a background comparison, those organics that
were not reported at concentrations above background are identified in the relevant Section
6 and Appendix K tables of the Zone 1 RI Report and Section 4 of the Mclntyre Brook/Lower
Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report.

Final summary tables were prepared for the COCs in each data set. Unless otherwise indicated, the final
summary tables contain the following information for each chemical: freguency of detection, range of
sample guantitation limits, range of averaged and detected concentrations, mean concentration (based on
the averaged values), and upper 95% confidence limit of the mean concentration. These summary tables are
presented in Section 6 of the Draft Final Zone 1 RI Report (G-623) and Section 4 of the Mclntyre
Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS, Report (G-618) . Tables 14 and 15 presents a summary of COCs by medium
for all media considered.

B. Human Health Risk Assessment

The objective of the exposure assessment is to develop exposure scenarios for each of the applicable
media and to calculate exposure doses to potential receptors. A most reasonable maximally exposed
individual (RME) was selected for each medium based on both current and future land and water uses.

A brief discussion of evaluated exposure pathways follows. A more thorough description is presented in
Subsections 2.3.1 and 3.3.1 of the Draft Final Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805). The
current use exposure pathways evaluated are summarized as follows:

• Flagstone and Pauls Brooks - A maintenance worker was selected as the current RME for
surface water and sediment. A maintenance worker is expected to come into contact with
surface water and sediment more freguently than would a trespasser. Because there are no
specific maintenance activities associated with Flagstone and Pauls Brooks, contact is
assumed to be limited to 0.67 hour/day, 12 days/year for these surface water bodies.

• Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch - A maintenance worker was selected as the current
RME for surface water and sediment. A maintenance worker is expected to come into contact
with surface water and sediment more freguently than would a trespasser. Contact with
Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch was assumed to occur for 2 hours/day and 1
hour/day, respectively. Exposure was limited to 12 days/year. The duration of exposure to
Mclntyre Brook was assumed to be longer than the exposure to Lower Newfields Ditch because
there are currently specific maintenance activities associated with the on-base portion of
the brook.

Future use scenarios were as follows:

• Flagstone and Pauls Brooks - A resident/recreational user was selected as the future RME for
surface water and sediment pathways associated with Flagstone and Pauls Brooks. Because of
the shallow depth of the brooks, recreational activities were assumed to be limited to
wading. Contact of a recreational user with surface water was assumed to occur for 25
days/year for each surface water body.

• Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch - A maintenance worker was selected as the future
RME for surface water and sediment in the on-base portion of Mclntyre Brook because it flows
through areas assumed to have a future industrial use. The future maintenance worker was
assumed to be exposed to the on-base portion of Mclntyre Brook for 2 hours/day, 12
days/year. A resident/recreational user was selected as the future RME for surface water and
sediment pathways associated with Lower Newfields Ditch and the off-base portion of Mclntyre
Brook. The exposure freguency and duration for the recreational user was assumed to be 1
hour/day, 75 days/year for these areas.

For each pathway evaluated, average and reasonable maximum exposure estimates were generated
corresponding to exposure to the average and maximum concentrations detected in that particular medium.

-------
Excess cancer risks were determined for each exposure pathway by multiplying the exposure level by the
chemical-specific cancer factor. Cancer potency factors have been developed by EPA from epidemiological
or animal studies to reflect a conservative upperbound of the risk posed by potentially carcinogenic
compounds (i.e., the actual risk is unlikely to be greater than the risk predicted). The resulting risk
estimates are expressed in scientific notation (e.g., 1 x 10 -6 for 1/1,000,000) and indicate (using this
example) that an average individual is likely to have 1-in-l-million chance of developing cancer over 70
years as a result of site-related exposure as defined for the compound at the stated concentration.
Current EPA practice considers cancer risk to be additive when assessing exposure to a mixture of
hazardous substances.

A hazard index also was calculated for each pathway as EPA' s measure of the potential for noncancer
health effects. A hazard guotient is calculated by dividing the exposure level by the reference dose
(RfD) or other suitable benchmark for noncancer health effects for an individual compound. RfDs have been
developed by EPA to protect sensitive individuals over the course of a lifetime, and they reflect a daily
exposure level that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of an adverse health effect. RfDs are
derived from epidemiological or animal studies and incorporate uncertainty factors to help ensure that
adverse health effects will not occur. The hazard guotient is often expressed as a single value (e.g.,
0.3) indicating a ratio of the stated exposure as defined to the RfD value (in this example, the exposure
as characterized is approximately one-third of an acceptable exposure level for the given compound). A
hazard guotient is only considered additive for compounds that have the same or similar toxic endpoint,
and the sum is referred to as the hazard index. For example, the hazard guotient for a compound known to
produce liver damage should not be added to a second whose toxic endpoint is kidney damage.

The total lifetime cancer risks and total hazard indices are presented by medium in Table 16. Where
applicable, the cancer risks and hazard indices were calculated using three concentrations: the mean, the
upper 95% confidence limit of the mean, and the maximum. Two subsets of total cancer risks and total
hazard indices were calculated for sediment and surface water. One subset was based on all of the COCs,
and the other was based on COCs that were detected above background.

The EPA range of generally accepted risk levels is 10 -4 to 10 -6. EPA typically reguires action for
cancer risk levels greater than 10 -4. The cancer risks posed to the RME for the sediment pathway for
Flagstone Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch were less than 10 -6 for all exposure concentrations. The
cancer risks posed to the RME for Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks were greater than 10 -6, but less than 10 -4.
In addition, there is no apparent potential for adverse noncancer health effects posed by exposure to
sediment at any of the surface water bodies evaluated (all hazard indices were less than 1, which is the
benchmark of concern).

The cancer risks posed by exposure to surface water in Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and
Lower Newfields Ditch were below 10 -6 for all exposure scenarios. Total hazard indices for all surface
water exposure scenarios were less than 1.

C. Ecological Risk Assessment

The ecological risk assessment evaluated the potential adverse impacts of the COCs detected in surface
water and surface sediment on aguatic life living in Lower Newfields Ditch and Flagstone, Pauls, and
Mclntyre Brooks.

Surface Water

Potential risks to aguatic communities were assessed by comparing surface water concentrations to NHDES
AWQC, or to federal or other aguatic toxicity data when AWQC were not available, as shown in Tables 17
through 20. In Flagstone Brook, chronic hazard indices for both average and maximum concentrations
exceeded 1 for 4,4'-DDT, aluminum, cadmium, and iron. All chronic hazard indices for Flagstone Brook were
less than 10. Acute hazard indices for maximum concentrations slightly exceeded 1 for aluminum, cadmium,
and copper. All acute hazard indices for average concentrations were below 1. In Pauls Brook, chronic
hazard indices for both average and maximum concentrations exceeded 10 for chlordane while acute hazard
indices for average and maximum concentrations exceeded 10 for 4,4'-ODD.

In Mclntyre Brook, chronic hazard indices for both average and maximum concentrations exceeded 10 for
mercury. All other chronic and acute hazard indices were less than 1. Chronic hazard indices for both
average and maximum concentrations exceeded 10 for 4,4'-DDT, heptachlor epoxide, and cadmium in Lower
Newfields Ditch. Chronic hazard indices for maximum concentrations slightly exceeded 1 for copper,
selenium and zinc. All other chronic indices were below 1. Acute hazard indices for maximum
concentrations slightly exceeded 1 for cadmium, copper, and zinc. All other acute hazard indices were
below 1.

-------
Sediment

The potential impacts of sediment contamination on the benthic and epibenthic communities in each surface
water body were evaluated by comparing sediment concentrations with NCAA ER-Ls and ER-Ms. In addition,
the EqP approach, a method recognized by EPA as a measure of bioavailability, was used to assess the
potential impact of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediment.

Flagstone Brook

The results of the ecological risk assessment for Flagstone Brook sediment are presented in Tables 21 and
22. ER-L hazard guotients (HQs) exceeded 1 for maximum concentrations of arsenic (HQ=9.82), chromium
(HQ=1.15), lead (HQ=2.58), and zinc (HQ=1.31) in Flagstone Brook sediment. The highest sediment hazard
guotient for organics in Flagstone Brook was attributed to pyrene (HQ=31.7) based on a comparison of AWQC
with the calculated interstitial water concentration. The hazard guotient slightly exceeded 10 for
4,4'-DDT (HQ=11.3) based on a comparison of AWQC with the calculated interstitial water concentration.

The elevated concentrations of PAHs in Flagstone Brook sediment also are not believed to be associated
with any of the areas of concern (AOCs) in Zone 1. The elevated concentrations are likely a result of
runoff from the North Ramp. The highest concentrations of PAHs in Flagstone Brook sediment were detected
at station 8031. This station is the most upgradient station and is located adjacent to the North Ramp.
Runoff from the North Ramp is directed to Flagstone Brook via a 3-foot-diameter pipe that receives
overland runoff from the North Ramp area. The runoff is considered to be a nonpoint source.

Based on the risk assessment previously presented, it was determined that concentrations of pesticides
and arsenic in sediment at stations 819 and 821 in Flagstone Brook exceeded ecological-based criteria and
resulted in hazard guotients of greater than 1. As a result, sediment toxicity tests were conducted on
sediment collected from these two stations to further determine if a potential adverse risk to ecological
receptors exists.

The results of the toxicity test are presented in the Toxicity Test Results for Flagstone Brook at Pease
AFB, NH (G-794). The letter report concluded that based on a decreasing trend in pesticide concentrations
in sediment, a serial dilution study in Flagstone Brook was not warranted. Pesticide concentrations in
sediment have decreased over time. In addition, interstitial water concentrations for the pesticides
4, 4'-ODD and 4, 4'-DDE did not exceed corresponding AWQC.

There has only been one sample collected at either station 819 or 821 that has exceeded the ER-L for
arsenic. The results of the toxicity test supported the decision not to develop remedial action
objectives (RAOs) for Flagstone Brook. Additional monitoring of sediment conditions would likely verify a
continued decline in sediment contaminant concentrations. This environmental monitoring will be conducted
at Flagstone Brook as part of the long-term environmental monitoring reguirements for the Landfill 5
source area and Zone 1 remedial actions.

Additionally, pesticide concentrations detected in Flagstone Brook are representative of basewide
conditions at Pease AFB as a result of routine pesticide use in accordance with standards for licensed
applications. Low levels of 4,4'-DDT and its breakdown products (DDE and DDE) have been detected in
streams throughout Pease AFB and are a result of general historic pesticide use rather than a specific
spill or release (G-797).

As previously mentioned, pesticides and PAHs detected in Flagstone Brook surface water and sediment
samples are not believed to be associated with any of the AOCs in Zone 1. In addition, metals detected in
Flagstone Brook sediment are considered to pose a limited risk to ecological receptors (HQs<10).

Pauls Brook

A comparison of maximum concentrations detected in Pauls Brook sediment and ER-L and ER-M values is
presented in Table 23. The results of the EgP evaluation for Pauls Brook sediment are presented in Table
24. ER-L hazard guotients exceeded 1 for maximum concentrations of seven metals in Pauls Brook sediment:
arsenic (HQ=2.3), cadmium (HQ=2.0), chromium (HQ=1.7), copper (HQ=2.0), lead (HQ=15.9), nickel (HQ=3.2),
and zinc (HQ=7.2). Heptachlor epoxide (HQ=2.69E+04) had the highest sediment hazard guotient for organics
in Pauls Brook. Interstitial water concentrations for pesticides in sediment in Pauls Brook also exceeded
AWQC and resulted in hazard guotients substantially greater than 1.

Based on the results of the ecological risk assessment for Pauls Brook, the EPA review of the Zone 1 FS
Report in August 1993 recommended modeling to assess the impact from bioaccumulation/biomagnification in
Zone 1. A bioaccumulation risk assessment was performed to estimate the potential for contaminants in the
sediment of Pauls Brook to bioaccumulate in terrestrial receptors. The study estimated the extent to
which these contaminants could adversely affect terrestrial wildlife through trophic transfer. A wetlands

-------
functional analysis also was performed to provide recommendations for any further action at Pauls Brook.
The results of these studies are presented in the Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment for Pauls Brook Report
(G-795) .

The potential for bioaccumulation was evaluated by predicting chemical uptake into earthworms from
site-related soil/sediment contamination and estimating chemical-specific doses to northern short-tailed
shrews that may feed on these earthworms. Potential exposure to the shrew through sediment ingestion also
was evaluated. The results of the bioaccumulation study indicated that a high probability exists for
adverse effects occurring to small carnivorous mammals feeding in Pauls Brook or in the adjacent
floodplain. Greater than 75% of the estimated risks to the shrew were a result of earthworm ingestion.

Based on the toxicological and exposure uncertainties associated with the bioaccumulation study,
earthworm tissue collection and revision of calculated risks based on actual tissue samples as opposed to
predicted tissue data were recommended.

The results of the revised risk assessment indicate that adverse effects potentially occur in carnivorous
small mammals feeding in the stream proper or in the floodplain adjacent to Pauls Brook, particularly
from exposure to chlordanes and lead.

During earthworm tissue sampling, signs of previously uncharacterized petroleum contamination were found
within the Pauls Brook drainage, including a strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor and a sheen on the water
and sediments. In addition, black deposits were found when digging for earthworms. Four sediment samples
(S001 through S004) were collected in this area. PAHs were detected above background concentrations in
all four samples. An additional 18 sediment samples were collected in the vicinity of Pauls Brook (S005
through S022) in May 1996, which confirmed the lateral extent of PAHs in sediments.

Mclntyre Brook

As shown in Table 25, the average hazard guotients, based on a comparison with ER-L values, for sediment
in Mclntyre Brook egualed or exceeded 1 for lead. Maximum hazard guotients for lead, nickel, and zinc
also exceeded 1. The results of the EgP evaluation for Mclntyre Brook indicated hazard guotients greater
than 1 for six PAHs, as shown in Table 26.

Based on the risk assessment, lead concentrations in sediment at stations 8057 and 8059 in Mclntyre Brook
substantially exceed NOAA ER-Ls. Calculated interstitial water concentrations for PAHs at these stations
also exceeded EPA AWQC. As a result, sediment toxicity tests were conducted on sediment collected at
stations 8057 and 8059.

No-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) and lowest-observed-effect concentrations (LOECs) were
developed as part of the serial dilution study for test organisms. These concentrations were assumed to
provide a range of chemical concentrations that can be interpreted as drainage-specific biological effect
levels. The calculated NOEC and LOEC for total PAHs (3.43 and 6.85 mg/kg, respectively) are relatively
close to the ER-L value of 4.00 mg/kg. In addition, these values are present in sediment below the
maximum background value of 8.94 mg/kg for total PAHs. The NOEC and LOEC of 8.94 and 17.88 mg/kg,
respectively, for lead are well below the ER-L value of 35 mg/kg. In addition, the NOEC and LOEC are
below the maximum background concentration of 42.1 mg/kg for lead in sediment at Pease AFB. Therefore,
the NOEC and LOEC for lead were below background levels and deemed to be too conservative for use in the
development of cleanup goals at Mclntyre Brook. The complete results of the toxicity tests are contained
in the Sediment Toxicity Letter Report for Pease AFB (G-758).

Lower Newfields Ditch

As shown in Table 27, the maximum hazard guotients, based on comparison with ER-L values, in Lower
Newfields Ditch exceeded 1 for lead at station 803 (HQ=4.29) and zinc at station 802 (HQ=1.69) but were
less than 10. Based on the EgP evaluation for Lower Newfields Ditch (see Table 28), hazard guotients
exceeded 1 for four pesticides (alpha- and gamma-chlordane, 4,4'-ODD and 4,4'-DDT) and pyrene. With the
exception of 4,4'-DDT, individuals HQs for the other three pesticides were less than 10. The HQ for
4,4'-DDT exceeded 10 at only one sampling station (802) (HQ=111). Based on the low individual HQs for
alpha- and gamma-chlordane and 4, 4'-ODD and low freguency of detection for 4, 4'-DDT, the potential for
adverse effects (acute and chronic) to occur to benthic and epibenthic life from these detected
contaminants appears limited. In addition, the concentrations of these pesticides in Lower Newfields
Ditch are likely the result of basewide use of these chemicals to control insects and are not a result of
a spill or release.

Although ecological-based criteria were slightly exceeded for pyrene, zinc, and lead, it is not believed
that these contaminants pose a significant potential for adverse risk. In addition, because sampling
location 802 is close to Spaulding Turnpike, the elevated lead and zinc levels are likely a result of

-------
runoff from vehicular traffic on the highway and are not related to a site-specific activity at the base.

Pyrene was the only PAH detected above the maximum background concentration that had an EgP value greater
than AWQC in Lower Newfields Ditch sediment. The elevated ecological risk associated with the PAHs,
pyrene, and lead at sampling location 803 is probably not related to site specific activity. Several
factors led to the conclusion that the PAH and lead contamination in this area is due to runoff from the
road and not related to site-specific activity on base. Asphalt paving and general vehicular traffic may
produce runoff with low levels of PAHs and lead. The upgradient sampling location does not exceed cleanup
goals for these contaminants, and the buildings that could discharge pyrene to the drainage ditch were
not used for industrial activities. These buildings include an elementary school and a barracks (Building
58). The hazard guotient for this upgradient sampling location (HQ= 1.76) is very close to the benchmark
HQ of 1, and the low total organic carbon (TOG) concentration in sediment at this sampling location could
have resulted in a higher hazard guotient with the EgP methodology.

Based on the information presented above, development of RAOs for Lower Newfields Ditch was not reguired.

Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook, if not
addressed by implementing the response actions selected in this ROD, may present an imminent and
substantial endangerment to public health, public welfare, or the environment.

VII. DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES

A. Statutory Requirements/Response Objectives

Section 121 of CERCLA establishes the following statutory reguirements and preferences:

• Remedial actions must be protective of human health and the environment.

• Remedial actions must comply with all federal and more stringent state environmental
standards, reguirements, criteria, or limitations, unless a waiver is invoked, during
implementation and upon completion..

• The remedial action selected must be cost-effective and use permanent solutions and
alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable.

• A preference for remedies in which treatment that permanently and significantly reduces the
toxicity, volume, or mobility (TMV) of the hazardous substances is a principal element over
remedies not involving such treatment.

Response alternatives were developed to be consistent with these mandates.

Based on preliminary information relating to the types of contaminants, environmental media of concern,
and potential exposure pathways, remedial action objectives (RAOs) were developed to aid in the
development and screening of alternatives. These RAOs were developed to mitigate existing and future
potential threats to the environment via source control. RAOs for Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook are
discussed in this subsection. Contaminants in surface water and sediment at Flagstone Brook and Lower
Newfields Ditch do not pose unacceptable risk (current or future) to human and ecological receptors to
reguire remedial actions under CERCLA. For this reason, no further action is warranted for these sites
under CERCLA.

Pauls Brook

The results of the human health baseline risk assessment indicated that no significant adverse health
effects to human receptors resulting from ingestion of or dermal contact with contaminated sediment or
surface water are expected at Pauls Brook. Because maximum sediment concentrations exceeded ecological
risk-based remedial objectives (ROs) or regulatory-based ROs, RAOs were developed for sediment in Pauls
Brook.

As previously mentioned, chronic surface water hazard indices for both average and maximum concentrations
exceeded 10 for chlordane while acute surface water hazard indices for average and maximum concentrations
exceeded 10 for 4,4'-ODD. It should be noted that AWQC were developed by EPA's Office of Water for the
protection of aguatic life. While the exceedences of these contaminants in surface water may pose a
potential risk to aguatic life, these contaminants were also detected in sediments. The results of the
bioaccumulation risk assessment report conducted as part of the ecological risk assessment for Pauls
Brook revealed that the majority of ecological exposure and risk was driven by sediment contaminants,

-------
specifically pesticides, bioaccumulating in benthic invertebrates that are ingested by terrestrial
receptors inhabiting the forested wetland system in Pauls Brook. Because the majority of ecological risk
was driven by the exposure of these contaminants to terrestrial receptors, cleanup goals for surface
water were not selected. However, it is expected that completed or planned source control remedial
actions (i.e., containment of source soil, excavation and containment of contaminated sediment, and
minimization of landfill leachate) will contribute to the improvement of surface water guality in Zone 1.
Specifically, the planned excavation of sediments from Pauls Brook is expected to contribute to the
attainment of AWQC over the long term. It should be noted, however, that final ambient surface water
guality will depend on a variety of factors, including potential upgradient sources of contamination,
background water guality, and the natural chemical eguilibria between sediment and surface water. For
these reasons, surface water cleanup goals were not developed for Pauls Brook.

Organic and inorganic contamination in Pauls Brook sediment are to be addressed by the following RAO:

• Protect ecological receptors from direct contact with, or ingestion of, sediment
containing contaminants at concentrations that may present an unacceptable ecological risk.

Figure 12 presents the area in Pauls Brook reguiring remediation based on the aforementioned RAOs.

Mclntyre Brook

Based on the baseline risk assessment, the contaminants in Mclntyre Brook do not present an unacceptable
risk to human receptors.

The results of the baseline risk assessment indicated that no unacceptable risk to human receptors as a
result of contact with surface water would be likely because the cumulative cancer risks neither exceeded
10 -6 nor a hazard index of 1. The ecological risk assessment indicated that chronic hazard indices for
average and maximum concentrations exceeded 1 for mercury only. However, mercury was only detected at one
station (811) in 1988 at a concentration of 0.29 Ig/L; mercury was not detected at that or any other
station during subseguent sampling events. For this reason, RAOs were not developed for Mclntyre Brook
surface water.

The sediment, however, may present an unacceptable risk to the environment. Organic and inorganic
contamination in Mclntyre Brook sediment are to be addressed by the following RAO:

• Protect ecological receptors from direct contact with, or ingestion of, sediment
containing contaminants at concentrations that may present an unacceptable risk.

Figure 13 presents the area in Mclntyre Brook reguiring remediation based on the aforementioned RAOs.

Based on the results of the sediment survey, excavation of fine-grained sand and silt sediment at the
water surface/bank interface is recommended in the area of stations 8059 and 8060. Excavation in the
vicinity of station 8057 should focus on removing the depositional silt that lines the channel bottom in
this area. The actual areas of sediment excavation will be determined through confirmational sampling at
the time of remediation.

B. Technology and Alternative Development

CERCLA and the NCP set forth the process by which remedial actions are evaluated and selected. In
accordance with this process, a range of alternatives was developed for Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook
that addressed the various media.

With respect to source area control, the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report (G-622) and the Mclntyre
Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618) developed a range of alternatives. This range included
an alternative that removes or destroys hazardous substances to the maximum extent feasible and
eliminates or minimizes to the degree possible the need for long-term management, an alternative that
involves little or no treatment but provides protection through engineering or institutional controls,
and a no-action alternative.

In Section 3 of the Draft Final Zone 1 FS Report (G-622) and Section 6 of the Draft Final Mclntyre
Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618), technologies were identified, assessed, and screened
based on implementability, effectiveness, and cost. The purpose of the initial screening was to narrow

-------
the number of potential remedial actions for further detailed analysis while preserving a range of
options. Each alternative was then evaluated in detail and screened in Section 5 of the Zone 1 FS Report
(G-622) and Section 7 of the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618).

Three source control alternatives (Alternatives 1 through 3) were retained for detailed analysis in the
Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618). Three source control alternatives
(Alternatives PB-1, PB-2, and PB-3A) also were retained for Pauls Brook for detailed analysis in the Zone
1 FS Report. However, one of the alternatives for each brook involved excavation of sediments with
consolidation of sediments on LF-5. Because consolidation on LF-5 is no longer feasible, this alternative
was eliminated from consideration in the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805). The
alternatives evaluated in the Zone 1 FS and Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report were
combined into three alternatives for both Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook in the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS
Consolidated Report. The alternatives evaluated included a no action, limited action (surface water and
sediment monitoring) and excavation/off-base disposal. Table 29 identifies the three alternatives that
were retained for detailed analysis.

VIII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES

This section provides a summary of each alternative that was evaluated and retained for the comparative
analysis in the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805).

The alternatives analyzed for Mclntyre Brook and Pauls Brook are as follows:

• Alternative 1: No action (always considered, as reguired by CERCLA) .

• Alternative 2: Limited action (surface water and sediment monitoring).

• Alternative 3: Excavation of selected Mclntyre Brook and Pauls Brook sediment with
off-site disposal, wetland restoration, and surface water and sediment guality monitoring.

Alternative 1: No Action

The no-action alternative was evaluated in detail in the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805)
to serve as a baseline for comparison with the other remedial alternatives under consideration. Under
this alternative, no treatment or containment of source materials would occur. Costs primarily include
completion of 5-year reviews.

Estimated time for design and construction: Not applicable.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: None.
Estimated operation and maintenance (O&M) cost: $26,200.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $26,200.

Alternative 2: Limited Action

This alternative would consist of the following components:

• Reliance on natural attenuation to reduce contaminant concentrations.

• Long-term surface water and sediment sampling to assess whether natural attenuation has
reduced contaminant concentrations, and to determine whether additional remedial action may
be warranted.

Estimated time for design and construction: Not applicable.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: Not estimated.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $660,500.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $660,500.

Alternative 3: Excavation of Selected Pauls Brook and Mclntvre Brook Sediment with Off-Base Disposal

This alternative would consist of the following components:

-------
• Excavation of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook and
off-base treatment and/or disposal.

• Sedimentation and erosion control during sediment excavation.

• Restoration of wetlands impacted or destroyed by sediment excavation at Pauls Brook.

• No further action for Lower Newfields Ditch and Flagstone Brook.

• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.

• Long-term environmental monitoring in Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks.

Estimated time for design and construction: 2 months.
Estimated time of operation: 30 years.
Estimated capital cost: $532,800.
Estimated O&M cost (net present worth): $659,751.
Estimated total cost (net present worth): $1,192,551.

IX. SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

Section 121(b)(1) of CERCLA presents several factors that at a minimum EPA is reguired to consider in its
assessment of alternatives. Building on these specific statutory mandates, the NCP articulates nine
evaluation criteria to be used in assessing the individual remedial alternatives.

A detailed analysis was performed on the alternatives using the nine evaluation criteria in order to
select a remedy for Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook. The following is a summary of the comparison of the
strengths and limitations of each alternative with respect to the nine evaluation criteria. These
criteria are summarized as follows.

Threshold Criteria

The following two threshold criteria must be met in order for the alternatives to be eligible for
selection in accordance with the NCP:

1. Overall protection of human health and the environment addresses whether a remedy
provides adeguate protection and describes how risks posed through each pathway
are eliminated, reduced, or controlled through treatment, engineering controls, or
institutional controls.

2. Compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate reguirements (ARARs)
addresses whether a remedy will meet all of the ARARs of other federal and state
environmental laws and/or provide grounds for invoking a waiver.

Primary Balancing Criteria

The following five criteria are used to compare and evaluate the elements of one alternative with another
once the threshold criteria have been met:

3. Long-term effectiveness permanence assesses alternatives based on the long-term
effectiveness and permanence they afford, along with the degree of certainty that
they will prove successful.

4. Reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume (TMV) through treatment addresses the
degree to which alternatives employ recycling or treatment that reduces TMV,
including how treatment is used to address the principal threats posed by the site.

5. Short-term effectiveness addresses the period of time needed to achieve protection
and any adverse impacts on human health and the environment that may be posed
during the construction and implementation period until cleanup goals are achieved.
It also evaluates how long it would take for an alternative to attain RAOs.

6. Implementability addresses the technical and administrative feasibility of a
remedy, including the availability of materials and services needed to implement a
particular option.

-------
7. Cost includes estimated capital, O&M, and present-worth costs.

Modifying Criteria

The following modifying criteria are used in the final evaluation of remedial alternatives generally
after public comments on the RI/FS Report and the Proposed Plan are reviewed:

8. State acceptance addresses the state's position and key concerns related to the
preferred alternative and other alternatives, and the state's comments on ARARs or
the proposed use of waivers.

9. Community acceptance addresses the public's general response to the alternatives
described in the Proposed Plan and RI/FS Report. Community acceptance of the
Proposed Plan has been evaluated based on written comments and verbal comments
received in public meetings during the public comment period.

Following the detailed analysis of each individual alternative, a comparative analysis, focusing on the
relative performance of each alternative against the nine criteria, was conducted. This comparative
analysis is presented in Table 30.

The following subsections present the nine criteria, including the two modifying criteria not discussed
in the RI/FS reports; a brief narrative summary of the alternatives; and the strengths and limitations
according to the detailed comparative analysis.

A. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment

The no-action and limited-action alternatives would not be expected to achieve cleanup goals over the
short term and ecological receptors would continue to be exposed to contaminants in sediment. Over the
long term, as contaminant sources to the respective waterways are controlled, and as natural attenuation
processes degrade residual contamination in the waterways, it is possible that sediment guality in Pauls
Brook and Mclntyre Brook could approach or meet cleanup objectives. However, it may be many years before
cleanup goals are achieved.

The limited-action alternative, which involves long-term surface water and sediment sampling and
analysis, would be more protective of the environment than the no-action alternative because it provides
for monitoring and evaluation of conditions in the brooks. This monitoring would be conducted to assess
the effectiveness of source control actions, to determine whether natural attenuation has reduced
contaminant concentrations, and to determine whether additional remedial action may be warranted.

The excavation alternative would likely protect ecological receptors over the short term because sediment
containing contaminants at concentrations above cleanup goals would be excavated and disposed of
off-site.

It is expected that removal of the sediment will, in conjunction with other source area actions conducted
in Zone 1 and Zone 3, help improve surface water guality in the brooks. Ultimately, surface water guality
would depend on a number of other factors, including background guality, the effects of potential
upstream contaminant sources, and natural chemical eguilibria between, sediment and surface water. The
excavation alternatives would likely aid in reducing contaminant concentrations in surface water in a
shorter period of time than would the no-action and limited-action alternatives.

B. Compliance with ARARs

Each alternative was evaluated for compliance with ARARs, including chemical-, action-, and
location-specific ARARs. These alternative-specific ARARs are presented in Appendix C of the
Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report. The no-action and limited action alternatives would not achieve
chemical-specific ARARs for sediment in the short term. Alternative 3 would be expected to comply with
all location- and action-specific ARARs.

C. Long-Term Effectiveness

The long-term effectiveness of the no-action and limited action alternatives would be similar, except
that under the limited-action alternative, surface water and sediment sampling and analysis would be used
to monitor the progress of source control actions and natural attenuation processes, and could be used to
determine whether and when additional remedial action was warranted.

-------
Under the no-action alternative, it is possible that cleanup goals would be achieved over the long term
as source control activities, such as bioventing at the BFSA in Zone 1, reduce contaminant loadings to
the respective waterways and as natural attenuation processes reduce residual contaminant concentrations.
However, it could be many years before cleanup goals are achieved under these alternatives.

The excavation alternative would achieve cleanup objectives for sediment in the short term and, possibly,
the long term; however, the degree to which sediment excavation would improve surface water quality
cannot be quantified. The ultimate surface water quality may also depend on factors such as potential
upstream contaminant sources and natural chemical equilibria between sediment and surface water.
Monitoring of surface water and sediments will be conducted to measure the long-term effectiveness of the
remedy. In addition, surface water monitoring will continue to be conducted by the Pease Development
Authority as required under the NPDES program. Coordination will be required between the Air Force, EPA,
NHDES and the Pease Development Authority to ensure that the permitted discharges under the NPDES program
do not threaten the protectiveness of the remedy.

D. Reduction in TMV of Contaminants

Because Alternatives 1, 2 or 3 do not involve the use of treatment technologies to reduce the toxicity,
mobility or volume of waste in sediments, none of these remedial alternatives will meet this criterion.

E. Short-Term Effectiveness

Implementation of the no-action and limited-action alternatives would not be expected to cause adverse
impacts on the environment. The only impacts on the environment associated with implementation of these
alternatives would be the continued potential for ecological risks associated with existing contaminant
concentrations. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require the longest time to achieve protection because they
rely on natural attenuation to degrade site organic contaminants, while the Alternative 3 involves active
removal of contaminated sediment. Alternative 3 is expected to be completed in approximately 2 months.

The excavation alternative would be protective of ecological receptors in the short term, but would
likely impact surrounding wetlands as a result of excavation activities. Impacts may include the loss of
vegetation, wildlife habitat and food sources, topsoil, and seed bank. Following excavation, the brooks
will be backfilled with clean soil to match pre-excavation grades, and sideslopes will be revegetated as
appropriate for stabilization. However, damage to Pauls Brook and surrounding wetlands will be
unavoidable. It is not expected that the extent of wetlands impacted by excavation would be significant.
Excavation of Pauls Brook sediment would be expected to impact adjacent mature forested wetlands.
Reestablishment of these forested wetlands would take many years.

The wetlands within the Pauls Brook watershed are primarily deciduous forest dominated by red maple (Acer
rubrum). Pauls Brook contains a defined bed and bank with a shallow depth-to-bed in some areas. Sheet
flow through wetlands often results from storm events. Areas of emergent wetlands are found within the
stream channel and in the headwaters adjacent to Merrimac Drive. Excavation of sediments will impact both
the existing stream channel and adjacent wetlands. It is estimated that 1 acre of wetlands and other
waters would be impacted by remediation in the Pauls Brook watershed.

A functional assessment of the Pauls Brook wetland complex was conducted as part of the bioaccumulation
study. Wetland functions that would be adversely impacted from remediation include hydrologic support,
water quality, and storm and floodwater storage. The Pauls Brook wetland complex had a low ranking for
the biological function because of its low diversity.

Remediation will result in negative short-term impacts to all wetland functions. However, most functions
will be restored following the completion of remediation and restoration of the impacted areas. In
addition, the benefit to the environment from removing accumulated hazardous chemicals outweighs any
short-term impacts. A negative long-term impact will be the removal of trees from the wetlands. The
impacted areas will no longer function as forested wetlands. While the area can be replanted, it will
take several decades before the area will again function as a deciduous forested wetland.

Alternative 3 involves slightly more impacts on site workers and the surrounding community because it
involves excavation of sediment for off-site disposal. Because Alternative 3 involves transporting
sediment off base, there could be additional risks to communities associated with accidental spills
during transport to the off-site facility.

F. Implementability

Alternative 1 is the easiest to implement because it involves no remedial activities. The limited-action
alternative, which involves long-tern monitoring of surface water and sediment quality, would be easily

-------
implemented using readily available equipment, services, and specialists. Monitoring would not interfere
with the ability to undertake any additional remedial actions, if deemed necessary in the future.
Alternative 3 would involve more scheduling problems because of the off-base treatment/disposal involved.
Excavation difficulties would arise during wet excavation (dredging) in the brook, and the materials
removed may present handling problems. The excavation alternative would require intensive preremedial
design sampling to better define the areas to be remediated.

Alternative 3 would be the most difficult to implement, from a regulatory aspect, because off-base
transport and treatment processes would likely require obtaining agency permits/approvals. Federal and
state agency permits for the off-base transport of contaminated sediment would be required.

Sediment excavation would not interfere with the ability to perform any additional remedial actions that
may be necessary in the future. Sediment excavation would be a reliable method for removing sediment
containing contaminants at concentrations exceeding cleanup goals

G. Cost

The estimated present-worth costs of the alternatives are as follows:

30-Year
Present Total
Worth Present-
Capital O&M Worth
Cost Cost Cost
Remedial Alternative ($) ($) ($)
Pauls Brook Mclntyre Brook
1. No action (always considered, as required by CERCLA). 0 26,200 265,200

2. Limited action (surface water and sediment monitoring in Pauls Brook 0 660,500 660,500
and McMtyre Brook).

3. Excavation of selected Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook sediment with 532,800 659,751 1,192,551
off-site treatment/disposal, wetlands restoration, and surface water
and sediment quality monitoring.

H. State Acceptance

As summarized in Section II of this document, NHDES has been involved in the environmental activities at
Pease AFB since the mid-1980s. The RI/FS Reports were developed with an Air Force lead, with NHDES and
EPA oversight, in accordance with the FFA. NHDES has reviewed this document and concurs with the selected
remedy. A copy of the Declaration of Concurrence is included in Appendix B.

I. Community Acceptance

The comments received during the public comment period and the public hearing on the Proposed Plan are
presented in the Responsiveness Summary (see Appendix C).

X. THE SEIiECTED REMEDY

The selected remedy (Alternative 3) for the remediation of Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks involve the
excavation of contaminated sediments. Sediment will be excavated using standard construction equipment,
such as a backhoe. Sediment with contaminant concentrations exceeding cleanup goals will be removed. The
volume of sediment to be excavated will be determined by confirmational sampling at the time of
remediation. Hay bales and silt screens will be used to minimize potential migration of contaminated
sediments during construction.

The excavated material will be transported to an approved off-base facility for disposal. Excavated
material will be analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the selected disposal facility. It is
not anticipated that excavated sediments would be characterized as a RCRA hazardous waste. Therefore,
treatment may not be required prior to disposal.

Surface water and sediment samples from Pauls Brook will be collected and analyzed semiannually for the
first 5 years following remediation and annually thereafter to monitor conditions within the brook.
Additional remedial actions may be considered if warranted.

-------
A. Methodology for Cleanup Goal Determination

Cleanup goals have been selected for sediment in Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook. Cleanup goals have been
established for COCs identified in the risk assessment section of the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated
Report (G-805) and for contaminants detected at levels exceeding ARARs, risk-based concentrations, or
background values.

Cleanup goals were selected after comparing maximum contaminant concentrations detected for each COG in
sediment with appropriate chemical-specific ARARs, background values, and ecological risk-based
concentrations.

Cleanup goals were not established for chemicals detected at maximum concentrations that were lower than
appropriate ARARs, background values, or risk-based concentrations. Cleanup goals for sediment in Pauls
Brook and Mclntyre Brook are summarized in the subsections that follow.

B. Pauls Brook

Table 31 presents ecological-based ROs (ER-Ls for inorganics, and EgP values for organics), risk-based
cleanup concentrations, maximum background concentrations, and maximum concentrations detected in
sediment, together with selected cleanup goals. For the pesticide COCs, ecological-based ROs were
compared to site-specific risk-based cleanup concentrations. Risk-based cleanup concentrations were
calculated using a predictive food chain model to estimate the potential for adverse risks to small
carnivorous mammals feeding on earthworms in the contaminated sediments. The risk-based cleanup
concentrations developed for these COCs represent a range of concentrations that provide protectiveness
based on a low exposure scenario (HQ=1) and a high exposure scenario (HQ=10). Because site-specific
factors have a direct impact on the bioavailability of contaminants to ecological receptors, the
site-specific risk-based cleanup concentrations were selected as cleanup goals for the pesticide COCs.
The conservative low exposure concentrations were selected as the cleanup goals due to the uncertainty
regarding receptor exposure to multiple contaminants (i.e., additivism, antagonism, and synergism). As a
result, cleanup goals were established for 4,4'-DDE, 4, 4'-ODD, and 4,4'-DDT.

Cleanup goals for total PAHs were selected for Pauls Brook, rather than for individual PAHs, based on the
results of discussions at a meeting attended by the Air Force, NHDES, and EPA New England on 17 January
1995. Sediment toxicity tests conducted at Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook where PAHs were a concern,
could not distinguish those individual PAHs that were responsible for the toxicity measured during the
tests. Therefore, the Pease background concentration for total PAHs was selected as the cleanup goal for
Paul Brook sediment.

For metal COCs, maximum detected concentrations were compared with ER-Ls and maximum background
concentrations, where available. Risk-based cleanup concentrations were also developed for cadmium and
lead. With the exception of cadmium, the higher of the three values were chosen as cleanup levels.
Because cadmium is a known bioaccumulator and is a significant contributor of total risk posed by Pauls
Brook sediments, the low exposure risk-based cleanup level was selected as the cleanup goal.

C. Mclntyre Brook

Sediment cleanup goals for Mclntyre Brook were developed for organics based on the EgP methodology, and
for inorganics based on comparison with the NOAA ER-L criteria. Background values were selected when they
were greater than the EgP value or ER-L. Tables 32 and 33 present the organic and inorganic cleanup
goals, respectively, for Mclntyre Brook. Cleanup goals for Mclntyre Brook sediment were developed for
total PAHs, lead, nickel, and zinc.

As noted in the supplement to the Draft Final Zone 3 FS Report (G-628), the pesticide concentrations
detected in Zone 3 sediment are representative of basewide conditions at Pease AFB. In addition, these
concentrations do not pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment and do not warrant
remedial action under CERCLA. A comparison of pesticide concentrations in Zone 3 sediment to ambient
basewide pesticide application concentrations is presented in the Pesticides in Sediment Data Review
Letter Report (G-797).

D. Description of Remedial Components

The selected remedy (Alternative 3) will involve the following key components:

• Excavation and removal of sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre
Brook.

-------
• Excavated sediment exceeding cleanup goals from Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook will be
transported off-base for treatment and/or disposal.

• Sediment and erosion control will occur during excavation. Sediment excavations will be
backfilled with clean fill.

• Restoration of wetlands impacted or destroyed by sediment excavation at Pauls Brook.

• Environmental monitoring during remedial operations.

• Long-term environmental monitoring in Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook, consisting of sediment
and surface water sampling and analysis.

Sediment Excavation and Off-Site Disposal

The selected remedy involves the excavation of sediment within Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook that exceed
cleanup goals for organic and inorganic contaminants. Sediment excavation would be conducted with
standard construction eguipment. The sediment will be properly secured for transportation to the off-site
disposal facility. A grading plan would be developed for each brook, and upon completion of excavation
activities, excavated areas would be backfilled with clean soil. Approximately 1 acre of wetlands
impacted or destroyed by remediation in Pauls Brook will be restored upon completion of excavation
activities. Excavated soil would be transported off-base; however, the final location for sediment
disposal would not be determined until the time of remedial design. It is not anticipated that excavated
sediments would be characterized as a RCRA hazardous waste. Therefore, treatment may not be reguired
prior to disposal. However, asphalt batching, an off-site disposal option that provides for both
treatment and resource recovery, may be considered as the cost is comparable with off-site landfill
disposal.

Confirmational sampling and analysis for VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides (in Pauls Brook only), and metals would
be performed to define limits of excavations and to ensure removal of contaminated material.

Construction Sequence

The excavation of sediments in Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook could occur simultaneously. Implementation
of the alternative is estimated to reguire 2 to 3 weeks for each brook. However, delivery of all
contaminated sediments to the off-site disposal facility could reguire several months, depending on the
scheduling constraints of the disposal facility.

The sediment excavation could be performed at any time during the construction season; however,
it is recommended that the sediment excavation occur in the drier months of the season, such as July and
August. This will minimize the erosion controls reguired.

Institutional Controls and Monitoring

No institutional controls will be necessary since all contaminated sediment exceeding cleanup goals will
be removed. Short-term sediment monitoring would consist of confirmational sampling for the excavation of
sediment. Long-term sediment and surface water monitoring would be performed at Pauls and Mclntyre
Brooks.

XI. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS

The remedial action selected for implementation in Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook is consistent with
CERCLA and, to the extent practicable, the NCP. The selected remedy is protective of human health and the
environment, attains ARARs, and is cost effective.

A. The Selected Remedy Is Protective of Human Health and the Environment

The remedy at Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks will permanently reduce the risks posed to human health and the
environment by eliminating, reducing, or controlling exposures to human and ecological receptors through
treatment, engineering controls, and institutional controls. Specifically, the selected remedy will
include:

• Excavation and off-base disposal of contaminated sediments from Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks,
thereby reducing receptor exposure to the sediments.

-------
B. The Selected Remedy Attains ARARs

This remedy will attain federal and more stringent state ARARs. The major ARARs that are either
applicable or relevant and appropriate to the selected remedy are as follows:

Chemical-Specific ARARs.

Clean Water Act (CWA) .

State of New Hampshire Surface Water Quality Regulations.

• Location-Specific ARARs.

Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA).

Executive Order 11990 (40 CFR 6, Appendix A), Protection of Wetlands.

CWA, Section 404 (40 CFR 230 and 30 CFR 320 through 330), Prohibition
of Wetlands Filling.

State of New Hampshire Administrative Code Env-Ws 300, 400, 600 C
Criteria and Conditions for Fill and Dredging in Wetlands.

Action-Specific ARARs

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

State of New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Management Act and Hazardous
Waste Rules, Env-Wm 100-1000

State of New Hampshire Admin Code Env-Wm 400-404 - Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Waste

State of New Hampshire Admin Code Env-Wm 707.3 - Waste Pile Reguirements

The Basewide ARARs Document (G-614) lists all ARARs identified for Pease AFB and provides a detailed
discussion of the ARARs. Table 35 provides a complete list of the ARARs and to be considered criteria
(TBCs) for the selected remedy, including regulatory citations; reguirement synopses; actions to be taken
to attain the reguirements; and determinations as to whether the reguirement is applicable, relevant, and
appropriate, or to be considered.

C. The Selected Remedial Action Is Cost-Effective

The Air Force considers the selected remedy to be cost effective (i.e., the remedy affords overall
effectiveness proportional to its costs). The overall effectiveness of each identified alternative was
evaluated by assessing the relevant three criteria: long-term effectiveness and permanence, reduction in
TMV through treatment, and short-term effectiveness. Effectiveness was then compared to the cost of each
alternative.

A summary of the costs of the remedial alternatives evaluated is presented in Subsection IX.G. The
selected remedy is the most effective alternative because it provides the highest degree of effectiveness
and permanence. While the selected remedy is the most expensive alternative evaluated, the cost is
proportionate to the high degree of effectiveness that it affords.

Costs associated with the selected remedy include costs associated with mobilization and demobilization;
pre-excavation sampling and analysis; sediment excavation, transport, and confirmatory sampling; sediment
disposal; backfilling with clean fill; sediment and erosion control; health and safety; and wetlands
restoration and long-term monitoring in Pauls Brook.

D. The Selected Remedy Uses Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment or Resource Recovery
Technologies to the Maximum Extent Practicable

The Air Force evaluated the alternatives to determine which provides the best balance of tradeoffs among
alternatives in terms of (1) long-term effectiveness and permanence; (2) reduction of TMV through
treatment; (3) short-term effectiveness; (4) implementability; and (5) cost. The balancing test
emphasized long-term effectiveness and permanence and the reduction of TMV through treatment, and

-------
considered the preference for treatment as a principal element, the bias against off-site land disposal
of untreated waste, and community and state acceptance. Of the alternatives evaluated, the selected
remedy provides the most favorable balance of the factors considered.

The selected remedy provides the highest degree of long-term effectiveness in the brooks. The selected
remedy, through removal of the sediment source areas, reduces the potential risks to ecological
receptors. Although on-base disposal is generally preferred, as previously mentioned, disposal of the
excavated sediment on base at LF-5 was originally considered; however, this option is no longer feasible.
Therefore, the off-site disposal option was selected.

E. The Selected Remedy Does Not Satisfy the Preference for Treatment That Permanently and Significantly
Reduces the Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of the Hazardous Substances as a Principal Element

Because the selected remedy does not involve the use of treatment technologies to reduce the toxicity,
mobility or volume of waste in sediments, this criterion will not be met.

XII. DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Remedial alternatives for Mclntyre Brook were originally developed in the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields
Ditch RI/FS Report (G-618). Remedial alternatives for Pauls Brook were originally developed in the Draft
Final Zone 1 FS Report (G-622). The Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (G-805) summarizes the
impact of Pease AFB sites on various surface water bodies that were not addressed in the Proposed Plans
or RODs for the various IRP sites or zones. The surface water bodies addressed in this ROD include
Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch. As previously mentioned,
alternatives involving sediment excavation with consolidation on LF-5 were eliminated from consideration
in this document because this is no longer a feasible alternative because LF-5 has undergone final
closure.

The selected remedy has undergone changes since the issuance of the Proposed Plan for Flagstone Brook,
Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook, and Lower Newfields Ditch. The Proposed Plan originally included surface
water cleanup goals for Pauls Brook as part of the proposed remedy. It was determined subseguent to the
issuance of the Proposed Plan that surface water cleanup goals for 4,4'-ODD, chlordane, iron, and zinc in
Pauls Brook were not reguired. While these contaminants exceeded AWQC and/or maximum background
concentrations, the results of the bioaccumulation risk assessment report conducted as part of the
ecological risk assessment for Pauls Brook revealed that the majority of ecological exposure and risk was
driven by sediment contaminants, specifically pesticides, bioaccumulating in benthic invertebrates that
are ingested by terrestrial receptors inhabiting the forested wetland system in Pauls Brook. Because the
majority of ecological risk was driven by the exposure of these contaminants to terrestrial receptors,
cleanup goals for Pauls Brook surface water were dropped from the selected remedy. However, the planned
excavation of sediments from Pauls Brook, along with other completed or planned source control remedial
actions in Zone 1 are expected to contribute to the attainment of AWQC over the long term.

XIII. STATE ROIiE

NHDES has reviewed the various alternatives and has indicated its support for the selected remedy. NHDES
has also reviewed the Zone 1 RI Report, Zone 1 FS Report, Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS
Report, and Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report, including the risk assessments, to determine
whether the selected remedy is in compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate state
environmental laws and regulations. NHDES concurs with the selected remedy for Pauls Brook and Mclntyre
Brook. A copy of the Declaration of Concurrence is included as Appendix B.

-------
                                        REFERENCES

G-8   AQUIRE. 1992. Aquatic Information Retrieval Computerized Database.  (Computerized database developed
      by EPA).

G-131 Eisler, R. 1987. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates. A
      Synoptic Review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
      Biological Report 85 (1.11).

G-135 Eisler, R. 1990. Boron Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review. U.S. Fish
      and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Biological Report 85  (1.20).

G-149 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1985. Chemical, Physical, and Biological Properties of
      Compounds Present at Hazardous Waste Sites. Prepared by Clement Associates, Inc.

G-189 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund - Volume
      I. Human Health Evaluation Manual Part A. Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
      EPA/540/1-89/002.

G-217 EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1991. Meeting among U.S. Air Force, Roy F. Weston,
      Inc.,  U.S. EPA Region I, and the State of New Hampshire. EPA Region I, Boston, MA. 10 September
      1991.

G-298 HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank). 1992. Computerized Database. On-Line. National Library of
      Medicine. Toxicology Data Network, Washington, DC.

G-568 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1991. Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk Assessments for the
      Pease AFB Sites. Roy F. Weston, Inc., West Chester, PA. July 1991.

G-570 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1992. Drainage Area Letter Report for Pease AFB, NH May 1992.

G-601 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1992. Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk Assessments for Pease
      AFB, NH.  February 1992.

G-614 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Basewide ARARs,
      Pease AFB, NH. January 1993.

G-618 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Mclntyre Brook and
      Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Pease AFB, NH. April 1993.

G-622 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Zone 1 Draft Final
      Feasibility Study Report, Pease AFB, NH. December 1993.

G-623 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.) 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Zone 1 Draft Final
      Remedial Investigation, Pease AFB, NH. October 1993.

G-628 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Zone 3 Draft Final
      Feasibility Study Report Pease AFB, NH. November 1993.

G-629 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1993. Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Zone 3 Draft Final
      Remedial Investigation Report, Pease AFB, NH September 1993.

G-758 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1994. Installation Restoration Program, Sediment Toxicity Letter
      Report, Pease AFB,  NH.  July 1994.

G-794 WESTON (Roy F. Weston Inc.). 1994. Toxicity Test Results for Flagstone Brook at Pease AFB, NH,
      Letter Report. April 1994.

G-795 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1995. Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment for Pauls Brook at Pease AFB,
      NH. August 1995.

G-796 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1995. Mclntyre Brook Sediment Excavation Letter Report, Pease AFB,
      NH. July 1995.

G-797 WESTON (Roy F. Weston,  Inc.). 1994. Pesticides in Sediment Data Review Letter Report, Pease AFB,
      NH. November 1994.

-------
G-805 WESTON (Roy F. Weston, Inc.). 1995. Draft Final Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
      Study Consolidated Report. Pease AFB, NH. November 1995.

G-855 Long, E.R. and L.G. Morgan. 1990. "The potential for biological effects of sediment sorbed
      contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program." NOAA Technical Memo NOS OMA 52.
      U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA.

G-857 U.S. Department of the Air Force. 1997. Proposed Plan for the Pease AFB Brooks and Ditches Operable
      Unit, Pease AFB,  NH. February 1997.

-------
                                  LIST OF ACRONYMS
1,1,1-TCA   1,1,1-trichloroethane
AAL         Ambient Air Limits
AFB         Air Force Base
AOCs        Areas of Concern
ARARs       Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
AWQC        ambient water quality criteria
BFSA        Bulk Fuel Storaqe Area
CE          Civil Enqineerinq
CERCLA      Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFA         Code of Federal Requlations
CWA         Clean Water Act
CZMA        Coastal Zone Manaqement Act
DCE         cis-1,2-dichloroethene
DEQPPM      Defense Environmental Quality Proqram Policy Memorandum
DOD         U.S. Department of Defense
EPA         U.S. Environmental Protection Aqency
EqP         equilibrium partitioninq
ER-L        bioloqical effects ranqe-low
ER-M        bioloqical effects ranqe-median
ESA         Endanqered Species Act
FFA         Federal Facilities Aqreement
FWCA        Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
HAs         Health Advisories
HMTA        Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
HQs         hazard quotients
IRP         Installation Restoration Proqram
LDRs        land disposal restrictions
LF-2        Landfill 2
LF-4        Landfill 4
LF-5        Landfill 5
LOEC        lowest-observed-effect concentration
M&E         Metcalf and Eddy, Inc.
MCL         Maximum Contaminant Level
MCLG        Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
NCP         National Continqency Plan
NHANG       New Hampshire Air National Guard
NHDES       New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
NOAA        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NOEC        no-observed-effect concentration
NPDES       National Pollutant Discharqe Elimination System
NPL         National Priorities List
O&M         operation and maintenance
OSHA        Occupational Safety and Health Act
PAHs        polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PCDA        Paint Can Disposal Area
PCE         tetrachloroethene
PDA         Pease Development Authority
RAO         Remedial Action Objective
RCRA        Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RfD         reference dose
RI          Remedial Investiqation
RO          Remedial Objective
ROD         Record of Decision
SARA        Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SVOC        semivolatile orqanic compound
SWQS        surface water quality standards
TBCs        to be considered criteria
TCE         trichloroethene
TMV         toxicity, volume, or mobility
TOG         total orqanic carbon
TPHs        total petroleum hydrocarbons
TSD         transportation, storaqe, and disposal
VOC         volatile orqanic compound

-------

        APPENDIX A

          TABIiES


           Table 1

Investigation Report Summary
Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
Phase, Stage
or Program
Stage 2
Stage 4





NA

NA

Report Date
July 1990
May 1992
May 1992
October 1992
April 1993
October 1991
December 1993
June 1992

November 1996

Author
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
WESTON
Fugro-
McClelland
WESTON
                                                                                     Report Title

                                                       Installation Restoration Program Stage 2 Draft Final Report
                                                       Drainage Area Letter Report
                                                       Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site Characterization Summary,
                                                       Zone 3
                                                       Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site Characterization Summary,
                                                       Zone 1
                                                       Mcylntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/
                                                       Feasibility Study
                                                       Draft Final Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report
                                                       Draft Final Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report
                                                       Wetlands Delineation and Evaluation for Pease International Tradeport

                                                       Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Consolidated
                                                       Report
                                                                                                              Zones/Sites
                                                                                                               Addressed

                                                                                                             Zone 1, Zone 3
                                                                                                                Basewide
                                                                                                                  Zone 3

                                                                                                                  Zone 1

                                                                                                           Mclntyre Brook/Lower
                                                                                                               Newfields Ditch
                                                                                                                  Zone 1
                                                                                                                  Zone 1
                                                                                                              Zone 1, Zone 3

                                                                                                            Flagstone, Pauls, and
                                                                                                          Mclntyre Brooks, Lower
                                                                                                              Newfields Ditch

-------
                                                        Table 4
                                     Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals
                                       Flagstone Brook Sediment Sample Results - Zone I
                                               Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH




Metal
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Detected
Background
Concentration
(mg/kg)
14,300
12.2
52.5
0.83
ND
3,330
53
14.4
23.2
21,900
42.1
6,450
358
0.2
46.7
2,840
ND
4,840
542
ND
35.7
105

Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(mg/kg)
11,100
324
583
0.87J
33.9
6,990
91.9
16.7
22.6
61,200
90.4
5,130
5,290
0.12
35. 8J
6,110
346
3,830
174
181
57.8
157J


Sampling
Location
ID
819A-D003
821-D003
8031-D104
819A-D003
8031-D104
8106-D001
8031-D001
819A-D005
819A-D004
8106-D001
8031-D005
821-D004
8106-D001
819A-D004
819A-D003
8031-D001
821-D003
819A-D007
819A-D007
821-D003
819A-D004
8031-D104


NOAA ER-L
Action Guideline*
(mg/kg)
—
33
—

—
--
80
—
70
—
35
--
—
0.15
30
—
—
—
--
—
—
120
*NOAA ER-L and ER-M values were taken from Long and Morgan,  1990 (G-855).
-- = Guideline not available.
ND = Not detected.



                                                                                             NOAA ER-M
                                                                                        Action Guideline*
                                                                                             (mg/kg)
                                                                                                85




                                                                                               145

                                                                                               390

                                                                                               110
                                                                                               1.3
                                                                                                50
                                                                                               270

-------
                                            Table 7
                            Summary of Highest Concentrations of Metals
                            Pauls Brook Sediment Sample Results - Zone 1
                                   Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH



Metal
(total)
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Detected
Background
Concentration
(mg/kg)
14,300
12.2
52.5
0.83
ND
ND
3,330
53
14.4
23.2
21,900
42.1
6,450
358
46.7
2,840
ND
9,840
542
35.7
105

Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(mg/kg)
29,200
76.2
317
1.2J
11.5
10.1
12,000
133
39.5
139
76,800
558
9, 670
22,900J
95.9
819
1.8
7,500J
536
168
868


Sampling
Location
ID
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
813-D004
8040-D004
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001
8041-D005
8039-D001
8040-D004
813-D003
813-D007
8039-D001
8039-D001
8039-D001


NOAA ER-L
Action Guideline
(mg/kg)
—
33
—
—
—
5
—
80
—
70
—
35
—
—
30
—
—
—
—
—
120
                                                                                           NOAA ER-M
                                                                                         Action Guideline
                                                                                              (mg/kg)
                                                                                                85



                                                                                                9

                                                                                               145

                                                                                               390

                                                                                               110


                                                                                                50
                                                                                               270
-- = Guideline not available.
ND = Not detected.

-------
                                          Table 8

          Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics  and Total Metals
                  Surface Water Analytical Results for Mclntyre Brook -  Zone 3
                                 Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
    Analyte
                            Maximum
                           Background
                          Concentration
 Regulatory
Guidance Value a
  Maximum
  Detected
Concentration
                                              Location ID
Organics                      (Ig/L)
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene         ND
Trichloroethene                ND
Metals(total)                 (mg/L)
Aluminum                      0.90
Arsenic                        ND
Calcium                      25.80
Iron                          2.89
Magnesium                     9.14
Manganese                     1.97
Mercury                        ND
Potassium                      ND
Sodium                        31.7
Silicon                       5.5
Zinc                         0.043
(Ig/L)
NA
NA
(mg/L)
0.087
NA
NA
1.0
NA
NA
0.000012
NA
NA
NA
0.134 b
(Ig/L)
0.2J
2.9
(mg/L)
0.225
0.0054
51.1
0.912
11.2
0.782
0.00029
5.06
12.3
7.09
0.0471
                                                8076-W001
                                                 812-W001
                                                8075-
                                                 812-
                                                8078-
                                                 812-
                                                8078-
                                                 812-
                                                 811-
                                                 811-
                                                8076-
                                                8076-
                                                 811-
                               -W001
                               -W001
                               -W001
                               -WO 02
                               -W001
                               -WO 02
                               -W001
                               -W001
                               -W001
                               -W001
                               -wool
a NHDES water guality criteria for toxic substances, freshwater  chronic  criteria for the protection of
  aguatic life.
b Adjusted for a hardness of 131.3 mg/L of CaCO 3.
NA = No criteria value available.
ND = Not detected.

-------
                                                   Table 9

                       Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics
                       Sediment Analytical Results for Mclntyre Brook - Zone 3
                                           Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                           Maximum
                          Background
 EqP Calculated
Interstitial Water
Maximum
Detected
    Organic Compound

VOCs
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl alcohol
Chlorobenzene
Methylene chloride
Toluene
SVOCs
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butyl phthalate
PAHs(total)
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Pesticides/PCBs
2,4-D
DDD(4,4'-)
oncentration
(Ig/kg)
ND
ND
ND
ND
24
e 750
ND
ND
8,940
ND
180
190
610
640
600
540
600
820
70
1,500
ND
500
ND
1,100
1, 600
ND
ND
ND
Concentration
(Ig/L)
22.9
NA
1.85
NA
NA
2.27
NA
NA
NA
92.8
NA
52.4
2.2
0.47
NA
NA
NA
16.3
0.161
53.4
81.4
NA
39.7
125
110
NA
595
0.00126
AWQC
(Ig/L)
763 a
NA
50 a
NA
NA
3.00 b
NA
NA
NA
520 a
NA
2.00 c
1.00 c
0.5 c
NA
NA
NA
100 d
100 e
3,980 f
580 g
NA
620 a
6.32 g
0.4 c
NA
3,360
0.06 f
Concentration
(Ig/kg)
170J
180J
6J
10
43
990
1,100
57
78,400
1,600
200J
2,100
8,000
6,800
8,400
3,200
5,500
8,600
1,400
15,000
1,700
4,100
270J
6,400
11,000
100J
52J
2.2J
Sampling
Location :
812-D001
8058-D001
8075-D001
811-D001
8057-D001
8059-D002
8059-D002
8078-D001
8059-D001
8059-D002
8056-D001
8057-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D002
8057-D002
8059-D001
8060-D001
8059-D001
8059-D001
8059-D002
811-D002
8056-D001
a NHDES freshwater chronic criteria.
b Based on NHDES freshwater chronic criteria for phthalate esters.
c Based on l/10th the LC 90 study for Daphia magna or Daphia pulex  (G-8).
d Based on l/10th the LC 90 for Nereis arenaceodentata  (G-8).
e Based on l/10th the LC 90 (96-hr) for the sandworm, Neanthes arenacedentata  (G-131).
f NHDES freshwater acute criteria.
g Based on EPA 1991 draft sediment guality criteria.

-------
                                                Table 10

                        Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Metals
                         Sediment Analytical Results for Mclntyre Brook - Zone 3
                                      Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
  Metal

Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Background
Concentration
(mg/kg)
14,300
12.2
52.5
0.83
ND
ND
3,330
53
14.4
23.2
21,900
42.1
6,450
358
ND
46.7
2,840
4,840
542
ND
35.7
105

NOAA
ER-L
(mg/kg)
NA
33
NA
NA
NA
5
NA
80
NA
70
NA
35
NA
NA
NA
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
120
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(mg/kg)
31,100
17.2
517
2.5
35.1
3.3
3,740
70.9
22.9
46.6
51,100
355
11,500
604
32.7
52.3
8,560
322
325
47
95.5
193


Sampling
Location ID
812-D001
8059-D002
8059-D001
812-D001
859-D001
8059-D002
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
8058-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
8075-D001
8056-D001
812-D001
812-D001
812-D001
ND = Not detected.
NA = No value available.

-------
                                                      Table  11

                   Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of  Organics  and Total  Metals
                      Surface Water Analytical Results  for Lower  Newfields Ditch -  Zone  3
                                          Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB,  NH
  Analyte
Organics
Chlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
DDT
Heptachlor expoxide
Methylene chloride
Metals
Aluminum
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Zinc
   Maximum
  Background
Concentration
   (Ig/L)
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
   (mg/L)
    0.90
     ND
   25.80
   0.015
   2.89
   9.14
   1.97
    ND
    ND
   5.5
  31.7
  0.043
Regulatory
 Guidance
  Value a
   (Ig/L)
     50 c
    0.763
    0.001
   0.0038
     NA
   (mg/L)
    0.087
   0.0014 b
     NA
    0.015 b
    1.00
     NA
     NA
    0.193 b
    0.005
     NA
     NA
    0.13 b
Maximum Detected
 Concentration

    (Ig/L)
    0.2J
    0.5J
    0.02J
    0.01J
   1,300J
    (mg/L)
   0.325J
    0.007
    40.4
    0.031
    1.48
    8.95
    0.374
   0.058J
   0.006J
    7.29
    44.2
   0.164J
 Sampling
Location ID

    802-W003
    802-W003
    802-W002
    803-W001
    803-W002
    803-
   8140-
    802-
    803-
    803-
   8140-
    803-
    803-
    802-
    803-
    803-
    803-
-W002
-W001
-WO 02
-WO 02
-W001
-W001
-W001
-W001
-W001
-wool
-wool
-wool
a NHDES water guality criteria for toxic substances, freshwater  chronic  criteria  for the protection of
  aguatic life.
b Adjusted for a hardness of 126.7 mg/L of CaCO 3.
c Value is for chlorinated benzenes.
NA = No criteria value available.
ND = Not detected.

-------
                                                 Table 12

                           Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Organics
                      Sediment Analytical Results for Lower Newfields Ditch - Zone 3
                                      Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
      Analyte

Benzole acid
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Pentachlorophenol
PAHs  (total)
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Pesticides/PCBs
Alpha-chlordane
Gamma-chlordane
DDT
ODD

Maximum
Background
Concentration
(Ig/kg)
720
750
ND
8,940
610
640
600
540
600
820
1,500
500
1,100
1,600
ND
ND
ND
ND
EqP Calculated

Interstitial Water
Concentration
(Ig/L)

146
0.592
0.796
NA
0.00298
0.0041
NA
NA
NA
0.0301
0.549
NA
0.795
0.704
0.0343
0.0167
0.111
0.0639

AWQC
(Ig/L)
146,000 f
3.00 d
11.6 h
NA
1.00 c
0.5 c
NA
NA
NA
100 c
3,980 b
NA
6.32 g
0.4 c
0.0043 a
0.0043 a
0.001 a
0.06 b

Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(Ig/kg)
360J
590
360J
2,050
41J
160J
410J
250J
200J
60J
590
190J
110J
190J
41J
20J
230
420



Location ID

8140-D001
8140-D001
802-D001
802-D001
8140-D001
803-D101
803-D101
802-D001
802-D001
8140-D001
802-D001
802-D001
803-D001
803-D003
802-D003
802-D003
802-D003
802-D001
a NHDES freshwater chronic criteria.
b NHDES freshwater acute criteria.
c Based on l/10th the LC 50 study for Daphia magna or Daphia pulex  (G-8)
d Based on NHDES freshwater chronic criteria for phthalate esters.
e Based on l/10th of the LC 50 for Nereis arenaceodentata  (G-8).
f Based on locomotor behavior effects study for Daphnia magna  (G-8).
g Based on EPA 1991 draft sediment guality criteria.
h NHDES freshwater chronic criteria, pH = 7.7.

-------
                                 Table 13

           Summary of Highest Detected Concentrations of Metals
       Sediment Analytical Results for Lower Newfields Ditch - Zone 3
                      Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
      Metal

Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silicon
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Background
Concentration
(mg/kg)
14,300
12.2
52.5
0.83
3,330
53
14.4
23.2
21,900
42.1
6,450
358
46.7
2,840
4,840
542
ND
35.7
105

NOAA
ER-L
(mg/kg)
NA
33
NA
NA
NA
80
NA
70
NA
35
NA
NA
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
120
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(mg/kg)
11,100J
14. 5J
130J
1.4
2,070
36. 3J
10.4
34. 4J
18,000
150J
3,540
580
37. 7J
1,880
336
211
33.6
67.1
203J


Sampling
Location ID
802-D003
802-D003
8140-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-S001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D003
8140-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
802-D001
ND = Not detected.
NA = No value available.

-------
                                     Table 14

               Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medluma - Zone 1
                          Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                                    Surface Water
                                                                 Sediment
             Chemical
             Organics
Acetone
Benzene
Benzoic acid
gamma-BHC  (lindane)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
2-Butanone
see-Butylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbon disulfide
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Chlordane  (total)
Chlorobenzene
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4' -DDT
Dibenzofuran
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene
Dieldrin
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Heptachlor epoxide
Isopropylbenzene
4-Isopropyltoluene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
PAHs
   Acenaphthene
   Acenaphthylene
   Anthracene
   Benzo(a)anthracene
   Benzo(a)pyrene
   Benzo(b)fluoranthene
   Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
   Benzo(k)fluoranthene
   Chrysene
   Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
   Fluoranthene
Flagstone
Brook
   x
   xb
Pauls
Brook
                   xb
                   xb
                   xb
Flagstone
  Brook
   x
   x
   x
   x
   x
   x
   x
  xb
                   xb

                   xb
                   xb
                              xc
                              xc
                              xb
                              xb
                               X

                               X
                               X
                              xb
                               X
                              xc
                               X
                              xc
                              xc
                              xc
                               X
                               X
Pauls
Brook



  xb

  xb
                           xb
                           xb
                            x
                            X
X
X
X
xb

xb
X
X
X
xb
xb
X
                           xb
                           xb

                           xb

                           xb
                            x
                            X
                            X
                           xb
                            X
                            X
                           xb
                            X

-------
                                     Table 14

               Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium a - Zone 1
                          Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
             Chemical
     Organics  (continued)
   Fluorene
   Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
   Phenanthrene
   Phenol
   Pyrene
n-Propylbenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2, 4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3, 5-Trimethylbenzene
m,p-Xylenes  (total)
             Inorganics
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
    Surface Water
Flagstone        Pauls
Brook            Brook
                   xb

                   xb
   x
  xb
   x
  xb
   x

   X
  xb
   X
   X
   X
  xb
                   xb
                    X
                    X
                    X
xb
                    X
                   xb
                    x
                    X
              Sediment
       Flagstone       Pauls
         Brook         Brook
                               x
                              xc
                               x
            x
            x
           xb
            x

           xb
            x
           xb

            x
           xb
                              xb
                               x

                               X
                               X
                              xb
                         xb
                          X
                         xb
 x
 X
 X
xb
xb
 X
xb
 x
 X
xb
 X
 X
xb
 X
 X
 X
                          X
                          X
a An "x" indicates that the chemical was selected as a chemical of concern for both the human health and
  ecological risk assessments, unless otherwise indicated.
b Selected as a chemical of concern for the ecological risk assessment only.
c Chemical was not detected above background.

-------
                                             Table 15

                       Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium a - Zone 3
                                  Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
         Chemical

Organics

Benzole acid
Benzyl alcohol
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
2,4-D
4,4' -DDD
4,4' -DDT
Dibenzofuran
1, 2-Dichlorobenzene
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene
cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Heptachlor epoxide
Methylene chloride

PAHs
          Surface Water                       Sediment
                     Newfields Ditch
Mclntyre Brook          (Lower)      Mclntyre Brook
                          x
                          x
                                         x c
                                         x b
                                         X C
                                         X
                                         X


                                         X
                                         X C
Newfields Ditch
   (Lower)
    x b

    x b
    x
    X
    X
    X
  Acenaphthene
  Acenaphthylene
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Benzo(b))fluoranthene
  Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
  Benzo(k)fluoranthene
  Chrysene
  Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
  Fluoranthene
  Fluorene
  Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
  Naphthalene
  2-Methylnaphthalene
                                         x
                                         x c
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x
                                         x c
                                         x c
    x b
    x b
    x b
    x b
    x b
    x b

    x b

    x b

-------
                                            Table 15

                       Summary of Chemicals of Concern by Medium a - Zone 3
                                  Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                                           (Continued)

                                        Surface Water                       Sediment
                                                   Newfields Ditch                   Newfields Ditch
         Chemical             Mclntyre Brook          (Lower)      Mclntyre Brook       (Lower)

Phenanthrene                                                           x                 x b
Pyrene                                                                 x                 x b
Pentachlorophenol                                                                        x
Toluene                                                                x c
Trichloroethene                     x
Inorganics
Aluminum                                                               x                 x c
Arsenic                             x c                                x c               x
Barium                                                                 x                 x
Beryllium                                                              x                 x
Boron                                                                  x c
Cadmium                                                x c             x c
Calcium                             x                  x               x c
Chromium                                                               x
Cobalt                                                                 x
Copper                                                 x               x c               x c
Iron                                                                   x
Lead                                                                   x                 x
Magnesium                           x                                  x c
Manganese                                                              x                 x
Mercury                             x
Nickel                                                 x               x c
Potassium                           x                                  x c
Selenium                                               x
Silicon                             x                  x
Sodium                                                 x
Thallium                                                               x                 x
Vanadium                                                               x                 x
Zinc                                x                  x               x c               x c


a An "x" indicates that the chemical was selected as a chemical of concern for both the human health and
  ecological risk assessments, unless otherwise indicated.
b Chemical was not detected above background.
c Selected as a chemical of concern for the ecological risk assessment only.

-------
                                                     Table 16

                              Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks rind Hazard Indices
                                            Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
     Medium
Surface Water d
         RME
                          Total Lifetime Cancer Risk a,b
                                       Upper 95%
                                      Confidence
                           Mean          Limit         Maximum
                                                                        Mean
Total Hazard Index a,c
      Upper 95%
     Confidence
        Limit        Maximum
Flagstone Brook
Pauls Brook
Mclntyre Brook (On
Base)

Mclntyre Brook
(Off Base)
Newfields Ditch
(Lower)
Sediment d

Flagstone Brook
Current maintenance
worker

Future resident/
recreational user

Current maintenance
worker

Future resident/
recreational user

Current and Future
Maintenance Worker

Current and Future
Resident/Recreational
User

Current Maintenance
Worker

Future Resident/
Recreational User
Current maintenance
worker

Future resident/
recreational user
2E-09 (ALL)
2E-09 (BG)
3E-08 (ALL)
3E-08 (BG)
2E-08 (ALL)
2E-08 (BG)
3E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
2E-10
NA
4E-09
1E-07
6E-08 (ALL)
3E-08 (BG)
2E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
3E-09 (ALL)
3E-09 (BG)
3E-08 (ALL)
3E-08 (BG)
5E-08 (ALL)
5E-08 (EG)
6E-07 (ALL)
6E-07 (BG)
3E-10
NA
7E-09
2E-07
2E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
7E-07 (ALL)
4E-07 (BG)
3E-09 (ALL)
3E-09 (BG)
4E-08 (ALL)
4E-08 (BG)
5E-08 (ALL)
5E-08 (BG)
6E-07 (ALL)
6E-07 (BG)
3E-10
NA
7E-09
2E-07
2E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
8E-07 (ALL)
5E-07 (BG)
3E-05 (ALL)
3E-05 (BG)
3E-04 (ALL)
3E-04 (BG)
6E-04 (ALL)
6E-04 (BG)
6E-03 (ALL)
6E-03 (BG)
8E-06
1E-06
6E-05
1E-03
2E-04 (ALL)
2E-04 (BG)
6E-04 (ALL)
6E-04 (BG)
4E-05 (ALL)
4E-05 (BG)
4E-04 (ALL)
4E-04 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-02 (ALL)
1E-02 (BG)
IE-OS
2E-06
9E-05
2E-03
7E-04 to 8E-04
(ALL) d
7E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
5E-05 (ALL)
5E-05 (BG)
5E-04 (ALL)
5E-04 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-02 (ALL)
1E-02 (BG)
2E-05
2E-06
9E-05
2E-03
9E-04 (ALL)
9E-04 (BG)
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)

-------
                                                     Table 16
                              Summary of Total Lifetime Cancer Risks rind Hazard Indices
                                            Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                                                     (Continued)

                                               Total Lifetime Cancer Risk a,b
                                                                                                    Total Hazard Index a,c
Mclntyre Brook (On
Base) d

Mclntyre Brook
(Off Base)  d
Newfields Ditch
(Lower) d


Mean
4E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
1E-06 (ALL)
4E-07 (BG)
6E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
7E-07 (BG)
5E-08 (ALL)
2E-08 (BG)
4E-07 (ALL)
1E-07 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
7E-07 (ALL)
3E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
9E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
8E-07 (BG)
IE-OS (ALL)
4E-06 (BG)
7E-08 (ALL)
3E-08 (BG)
5E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)


Maximum
9E-07 (ALL)
4E-07 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
1E-06 (BG)
2E-06 (ALL)
8E-07 (BG)
IE-OS (ALL)
4E-06 (BG)
7E-08 (ALL)
3E-08 (BG)
5E-07 (ALL)
2E-07 (BG)


Mean
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)
8E-03 (ALL)
8E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
1E-03 (ALL)
1E-03 (BG)
3E-04 (ALL)
3E-04 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
Upper 95%
Confidence
Limit
7E-03 (ALL)
7E-03 (BG)
2E-02 (ALL)
2E-02 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
4E-03 (ALL)
4E-03 (BG)
5E-04 (ALL)
5E-04 (BG)
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)


Maximum
9E-03 (ALL)
9E-03 (BG)
2E-02 (ALL)
2E-02 (BG)
2E-03 (ALL)
2E-03 (BG)
4E-03 (ALL)
4E-03 (BG)
5E-04 (ALL)
5E-04 (BG)
3E-03 (ALL)
3E-03 (BG)
     Medium                   RME
Pauls Brook          Current maintenance
                     worker

                     Future resident/
                     recreational user

                     Current and Future
                     Maintenance Worker

                     Current and Future
                     Resident/Recreational
                     User

                     Current Maintenance
                     Worker

                     Future Resident/
                     Recreational Worker

a Values are rounded to one significant figure.
b Maximum cancer risk at hazardous waste sites is regulated in the range of 1E-06 to 1E-04 (10 -6 to 10 -4).  Risks of less than 1E-06
  (10 -6)  are generally not of concern.
c A hazard index or greater than 1 (1E+00) is usually considered the benchmark of potential concern.
d ALL = Includes all evaluated COCs.
  BG = Includes only the evaluated COCs that were detected above background.
  NA = Not applicable,  there were no carcinogenic COCs.

-------
                                                      Table 17
                              Hazard Quotients Based on Surface Water Concentrations in
                             Flagstone Brook and Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Zone 1
                                             Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                          Chemical
                          Organics
gamma-BHC
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chlorobenzene
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4' -DDT
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tetrachloroethene
                        Inorganics
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Iron
Magnesium
Nickel
Silicon
Zinc
 Surface Water Concentration in
        Flagstone Brook
              (Ig/L)
Average              Maximum
New Hampshire Water Quality
        Criteria
          (Ig/L)
 Acute             Chronic
Hazard Quotients Based on
      Acute Criteria
 Average           Maximum
Hazard Quotients Based on
     Chronic Criteria
  Average         Maximum
1.78E-02
1.50E+00
4.00E-01
5.80E-03
1.81E-02
5.03E-02
2.00E-01
3.81E-01
3.02E+02
3.46E+01
7.01E+01
5.20E+00
3.51E+04
9.90E+00
2.02E+03
7.41E+03
2.89E+01
4.97E+03
3.74E+01
2,
2,
7,
1.
2,
1.
5,
1.
1.
1.
2,
5,
5,
3,
8,
1.
2,
9,
1.
. OOE-02
. OOE+00
. OOE-01
.OOE-02
.OOE-02
.40E-01
.OOE-01
. 10E+00
. 05E+03
. 04E+02
. 10E+02
.20E+00
. 14E+04
. 40E+01
.52E+03
. 08E+04
. 89E+01
. 46E+03
. 46E+02
2,

2,
6,
1.
1.
1.
5,
7,
5,

2,

2,


1.

1.
.OOE+00 a
NCA
.50E+02
.OOE-02
. 05E+03
. 10E+00
. 12E+03 b
.28E+03
.50E+02
. OOE+04 c
NCA
. 46E+00 a
NCA
.48E+01 c
NCA
NCA
. 92E+03 c
NCA
.58E+02 e
1. OOE-02 a
2,
5,


1.
7,
8,
8,

6,
1.

1.
1.

2,

1.
.50E+00
. OOE+01
NCA
NCA
. OOE-03
. 63E+02 b
. 40E+02
.70E+01
NCA
. 40E+03 d
.50E+00 a
NCA
. 61E+01 c
. OOE+03
NCA
. 13E+03 c
NCA
. 44E+02 e
8.90E-03

1.
9,
1.
4,
4,
7,
4,
6,

2,

3,


1.

2,
NCA
. 60E-03
. 67E-02
.72E-05
.57E-02
.46E-04
.22E-05
. 03E-01
. 92E-04
NCA
. 11E+00
NCA
. 99E-01
NCA
NCA
.511E-02
NCA
.37E-01
1. OOE-02

2,
1.
1.
1.
4,
2,
1.
2,

2,

1.


1.

9,
NCA
. 80E-03
. 67E-01
. 90E-05
.27E-01
.46E-04
.08E-04
. 40E+00
. 08E-03
NCA
. 11E+00
NCA
. 37E+00
NCA
NCA
.51E-02
NCA
.24E-01
2.
6
8


5
2
4.
3

1
3

6
2

1

2
23E-01
.OOE-01
.OOE-03
NCA
NCA
.03E+01
. 62E-04
54E-04
.47E+00
NCA
.10E-02
.47E+00
NCA
.15E-01
.02E+00
NCA
.36E-02
NCA
. 60E-01
2.50E-01
8. OOE-01
1.40E-02
NCA
NCA
1.40E+02
6.55E-04
1.31E-03
1.21E+01
NCA
3.28E-02
3.47E+00
NCA
2.11E+00
8.52E+00
NCA
1.36E-02
NCA
1.01E+00
a Value is for hexachlorocyctohexane (lindane).
b Value is for dichlorobenzene.
c Soluble barium concentration in freshwater and salt water generally would have to exceed 50 mg/L before toxicity to aguatic life could be expected (G-149).
d Toxicity value obtained from the literature based on a 21 -day NOEC for Daphnia magna (G-135).
e Value is based on an average measured hardness of 143.0 mg/L of CaCO 3 for Flagstone Brook.
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                                      Table 18
                              Hazard Quotients Based on Surface Water Concentrations in
                             Flagstone Brook and Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Zone 1
                                             Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                          Chemical
                          Organics
Benzene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
4,4'-DDD
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenol
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
m, p-Xylene
                         Inorganics
Boron
Calcium
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Silicon
Zinc
Surface Water Concentration in Pauls
                Brook
                (Ig/L)
   Average              Maximum
New Hampshire Water Quality
      Criteria
        (Ig/L)
Acute            Chronic
Hazard Quotients Based on
      Acute Criteria
 Average           Maximum
Hazard Quotients Based on
     Chronic Criteria
   Average        Maximum
4,
2,
5,
1.
8,
3,
1.
2,
4,
2,
1.
1.
4,
1.
1.
1.
9,
5,
3,
.33E+00
. OOE+00
. 90E-01
.OOE-01
.20E-01
. 13E-01
.OOE-01
.OOE+00
.OOE-01
.OOE-01
.OOE-01
. 87E+02
.58E+04
.75E+03
.37E+04
. 19E+03
.30E+00
. 77E+03
.27E+01
9,
2,
1.
1.
2,
5,
1.
2,
4,
2,
1.
2,
4,
3,
1.
2,
2,
8,
1.
.OOE+00
.OOE+00
.30E+00
.OOE-01
.20E+00
.OOE-01
.OOE-01
.OOE+00
.OOE-01
.OOE-01
.OOE-01
.27E+02
. 95E+04
.24E+03
. 65E+04
.34E+03
.20E+01
. 10E+03
.76E+02
5,

2,
2,
6,
3,
2,
1.


1.





2,

1.
.30E+03
NCA
. 40E+00
.50E+02 a
. OOE-02
.20E+04
. 30E+03
. 02E+04
NCA
NCA
.50E+05 b
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
.34E+03 d
NCA
. 93E+02 d

2,
4,
5,


6,
2,



6,

1.


2,

1.
NCA
.50E+00
.30E-03
. OOE+01 a
NCA
NCA
.20E+02
.56E+03
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 40E+03 c
NCA
. OOE+03
NCA
NCA
. 60E+02 d
NCA
.75E+02 d
8,

2,
4,
1.
9,
4,
1.


6,





3,

1.
. 17E-04
NCA
.46E-01
.OOE-04
.37E+01
.78E-06
.35E.05
. 96E-04
NCA
NCA
. 67E-07
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 98E-03
NCA
. 69E-01
1.

5,
2,
3,
1.
4,
1.


6,





9,

9,
.70E-03
NCA
.42E-01
. OOE-03
. 67E+01
.56E-05
.35E-05
. 96E-04
NCA
NCA
. 67E-07
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 41E-03
NCA
. 12E-01

8,
1.
2,


1.
7,



2,

1.


3,

1.
NCA
.OOE-01
.37E+02
.OOE-03
NCA
NCA
. 61E-04
.81E-04
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 92E-02
NCA
.75E+00
NCA
NCA
.58E-02
NCA
.87E-01

8
3
2


1
7



3

3


8

1
NCA
.OOE-01
.02E+02
.OOE-03
NCA
NCA
.61E-04
.81E-04
NCA
NCA
NCA
.55E-02
NCA
.24E+00
NCA
NCA
.46E-02
NCA
.01E+00
a Value is for chlorinated benzenes.
b Toxicity value based on a 24-hour LC 50 value for Daphnia magna (G-8).
c Toxicity value obtained from the literature based on a 21 -day NOEC for Daphnia magna (G-135) .
d Value based on a calculated average hardness of 180.7 mg/L of CaCO 3 for Pauls Brook.
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                                 Table 19
                         Hazard Quotients Based on Surface Water Concentrations in
               Mclntyre Brook (On and Off Base)  and Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Zone 3
                                        Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
           Chemical
Organics
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Inorganics
Arsenic
Calcium
Magnesium
Mercury
Potassium
Silicon
Zinc
      Surface Water
     Concentration
   in Mclntyre Brook
          (Ig/L)
Average        Maximum
   New Hampshire
  Water Quality
     Criteria
       (Ig/L)
Acute       Chronic
 Hazard Quotients
     Based on
  Acute Criteria
Average       Maximum
 Hazard Quotients
     Based on
 Chronic Criteria
Average        Maximum
2,
9,
5,
3,
7,
7,
2,
5,
1.
. OOE-01
.50E-01
. 40E+00
. 46E+04
. 36E+03
. 60E-02
. 62E+03
.34E+03
. 06E+01
2,
2,
5,
5,
1.
2,
5,
7,
4,
.OOE-01
. 90E+00
. 40E+00
. 11E+04
. 12E+04
. 90E-01
. 05E+03
. 07E+03
.71E+01
1
4



2


1
.16E+04 a
.50E+04
NCA
NCA
NCA
.40E+00
NCA
NCA
.47E+02 b
NCA
2.19E+04
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.20E-02
NCA
NCA
1.34E+02 b
1
2



3


7
.72E-05
.HE-OS
NCA
NCA
NCA
.17E-02
NCA
NCA
.21E-02
1,
6,



1,


3,
.72E-05
.44E-05
NCA
NCA
NCA
.21E-01
NCA
NCA
.20E-01
NCA
4.34E-05
NCA
NCA
NCA
6.33E+00
NCA
NCA
7.91E-02
NCA
1.32E-04
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.42E+01
NCA
NCA
3.51E-01
a Value is for dichloroethene.
b Value based on an average calculated hardness of 131.2 mg/L of CaCO 3 for Mclntyre Brook.
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                                            Table 20
     Chemical

Organics
Chlorobenzene
4,4' -DDT
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Heptachlor epoxide
Methylene chloride
Inorganics
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Nickel
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Zinc
                                   Hazard Quotients Based on Surface Water Concentrations in
                                Lower Newfields Ditch and Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Zone 3
                                                  Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
    Surface Water
Concentration in Lower
   New fields Ditch
       (Ig/L)
Average        Maximum
    New Hampshire
    Water Quality
      Criteria
        (Ig/L)
Acute        Chronic
    Hazard Quotient
Based on Acute Criteria
  Average      Maximum
     Hazard Quotient
Based on Chronic Criteria
 Average         Maximum
2.00E-01
2.00E-02
2.92E-01
l.OOE-02
1.45E+02
4.33E+00
3.67E+04
1.12E+01
1.43E+01
4.30E+00
5.75E+03
3.37E+04
2.93+01
2.
2.
5.
1.
1.
7.
4.
3.
5.
6.
7.
4.
1.
OOE-01
OOE-02
OOE-01
OOE-02
30E+03
OOE+00
04E+04
10E+01
80E+01
10E+00
29E+03
42E+04
64E+02
2.50E+02
1.10E+00
1.12E+03
5.20E-01
3.10E+05
5.12E+00
NCA
2.22E+01
1.73E+03
2.00E+01
NCA
NCA
1.43+02
a


b
c
d

d
d



d
5.00E+01
l.OOE-03
7.63E+02
3.80E-03
NCA
1.40E+00
NCA
1.45E+01
1.93E+02
5. OOE+00
NCA
NCA
1.30E+02
a


b

d

d
d



d
8.00E-04
1.82E-02
2.60E-04
1.92E-02
4.68E-04
8.46E-01
NCA
5.05E-01
8.25E-03
2.15E-01
NCA
NCA
2.05E-01
8,
1,
4,
1,
4,
1,

1,
3,
3,


1,
. OOE-04
. 82E-02
.46E-04
. 92E-02
. 19E-03
. 37E+00
NCA
. 40E+00
.35E-02
. 05E-01
NCA
NCA
. 15E+00
4,
2,
3,
2,

3,

7,
7,
8,


2,
. OOE-03
.OOE-01
.82E-04
. 63E+00
NCA
. 09E+00
NCA
.72E-01
. 42E-02
. 60E-01
NCA
NCA
.26E-01
4. OOE-03
2.00E+01
6.55E-04
2.63E+00
NCA
5. OOE+00
NCA
2.14E+00
3.01E-01
1.22E+00
NCA
NCA
1.27E+00
 a NHDES water guality criteria for chlorinated benzenes.
 b NHDES water guality criteria for heptachlor.
 c Value is the LC 50(24-hr) for the water flea (Daphnia magna).
 d Value is based on an average calculated hardness of approximately 126.7 mg/L CaCO 3.
 NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                                           Table 21
       Inorganic Analyte
  Arsenic
  Barium
  Beryllium
  Boron
  Chromium
  Cobalt
  Iron
  Lead
  Manganese
  Selenium
  Thallium
  Vanadium
  Zinc
                                     Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological
                                            Effect Levels for Flagstone Brook - Zone 1
                                                   Brooks/Ditches,  Pease AFB, NH
Sediment Concentration in
     Flagstone Brook
         (mg/kg)
  Average       Maximum
   NOAA Biological
    Effect Level
       (mg/kg)
ER-L         ER-M
      ER-L Hazard
       Quotient
Average      Maximum
       ER-M Hazard
         Quotient
Average      Maximum
2.
6.
3.
1.
2.
8.
6.
3.
9.
4.
1.
2.
6.
30E+01
80E+01
61E-01
30E+01
20E+01
62E+00
12E+04
30E+01
87E+02
90E+00
30E+01
20E+01
85E+01
3.
5.
8.
3.
9.
1.
6.
9.
5.
3.
1.
5.
1.
24E+02
83E+02
70E-01
39E+01
20E+01
67E+01
12E+04
04E+01
29E+03
46E+02
81E+02
80E+01
57E+02
3.30E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
8.00E+01
NCA
NCA
35
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
120
8.50E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.45E+02
NCA
NCA
110
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
270
6.97E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
2.75E-01
NCA
NCA
9.43E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
5.71E-01
9.82E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.15E+00
NCA
NCA
2.58E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.31E+00
2



1


3




2
.71E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
.52E-01
NCA
NCA
.OOE-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
.54E-01
3.81E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
6.34E-01
NCA
NCA
8.22E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
5.81E-01
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                                            Table 23
                                     Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological
                                              Effect Levels for Pauls Brook - Zone 1
                                                  Brooks/Ditches,  Pease KFB, NH
       Inorganic Analyte
  Aluminum
  Arsenic
  Barium
  Beryllium
  Boron
  Cadmium
  Calcium
  Chromium
  Cobalt
  Copper
  Iron
  Lead
  Magnesium
  Manganese
  Nickel
  Selenium
  Vanadium
  Zinc
Sediment Concentration in Pauls
            Brook
           (mg/kg)
     Average       Maximum
 NOAA Biological
  Effect Level
    (mg/kg)
ER-L         ER-M
     ER-L Hazard
       Quotient
Average      Maximum
     ER-M Hazard
       Quotient
Average      Maximum
1.36E+04
3.23E+01
1.15E+02
7.98E-01
1.15E+01
3.47E+00
4.50E+03
5.71E+01
1.61E+01
1.95E+01
3.15E+04
1.73E+02
3.48E+03
8.07E+03
3.79E+01
1.28E+00
6.10E+01
2.50E+02
2.
7.
3.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
4.
1.
7.
5.
9.
2.
9.
1.
1.
8.
92E+04
60E+01
17E+02
20E+00
15E+01
OOE+01
20E+04
33E+02
OOE+01
39E+02
68E+04
58E+02
67E+03
10E+04
60E+01
80E+00
68E+02
68E+02
NCA
3.30E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
5.00E+00
NCA
8. OOE+01
NCA
70
NCA
3.50E+01
NCA
NCA
3. OOE+01
NCA
NCA
1.20E+02
NCA
8.50E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
9.00E+00
NCA
1.45E+02
NCA
390
NCA
1.10E+02
NCA
NCA
5. OOE+01
NCA
NCA
2.70E+02

9,



6,

7,

2,

4,


1,


2,
NCA
.79E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 94E-01
NCA
.14E-01
NCA
.79E-01
NCA
. 94E+00
NCA
NCA
.26E+00
NCA
NCA
. 08E+00

2,



2,

1,

1,

1,


3,


7,
NCA
.30E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
. OOE+00
NCA
. 66E+00
NCA
. 99E+00
NCA
.59E+01
NCA
NCA
.20E+00
NCA
NCA
.23E+00

3



3

3

5

1


7


9
NCA
.80E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
.86E-01
NCA
. 94E-01
NCA
. OOE-02
NCA
.57E+00
NCA
NCA
.58E-01
NCA
NCA
.26E-01
NCA
8.94E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
1.11E+00
NCA
9.17E-01
NCA
3.56E-01
NCA
5.07E+00
NCA
NCA
1.92E+00
NCA
NCA
3.21E+00
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
        Metal
                                                      Table 25

                               Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological
                              Effect Levels for Mclntyre Brook (On and Off Base) - Zone 3
                                             Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
      Sediment
   Concentration
 in Mclntyre Brook
      (mg/kg)
Average     Maximum
                                               NOAA. Biological
                                                Effect Level
                                                   (mg/kg)
                                               ER-L       ER-M
     ER-M Hazard
      Quotient
Average       Maximum
     ER-L Hazard
      Quotient
Average       Maximum
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
9, 652
9.4
146
0.69
14
2.2
1,754
29
9.0
18
17,992
116
4,142
384
23
13
28
93
31,100
17.2
517
2.5
35.1
3.3
3,740
71
23
46.6
51,100
355
11,500
604
52.3
47
96
193
NCA
33
NCA
NCA
NCA
5
NCA
80
NCA
70
NCA
35
NCA
NCA
30
NCA
NCA
120
NCA
85
NCA
NCA
NCA
9
NCA
145
NCA
390
NCA
110
NCA
NCA
50
NCA
NCA
270

1



2

2

4

1


4


3
NCA
.11E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
.44E-01
NCA
.OOE-01
NCA
.62E-02
NCA
.05E+00
NCA
NCA
.60E-01
NCA
NCA
.44E-01

2,



3,

4,

1,

3,


1,


7,
NCA
. 02E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
. 67E-01
NCA
. 90E-01
NCA
. 19E-01
NCA
.23E+00
NCA
NCA
. 05E+00
NCA
NCA
. 15E-01

2,



4,

3,

2,

3,


7,


7,
NCA
.85E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
.40E-01
NCA
. 63E-01
NCA
.57E-01
NCA
.31E+00
NCA
NCA
. 67E-01
NCA
NCA
.75E-01
NCA
5.21E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
6.60E-01
NCA
8.88E-01
NCA
6.66E-01
NCA
1.01E+01
NCA
NCA
1.74E+00
NCA
NCA
1.61E+00
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                        Table 26

            Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations (On and Off Base)
                   Mclntyre Brook Sediment and Toxicity Values - Zone 3
                              Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
  Location

Station 8078
Station 8077
Station 8076
Station 8075
Station 8060
        Chemical

PAHs
  Benzo(a)anthrecene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Acenaphthene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Fluorene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
Interstitial
Water
Concentration
(Ig/L)
7.08E-03
5.81E-02
1.16E-01
6.12E-01
1.07E+00
4.43E-02
9.25E-03
3.05E-01
8.08E-01
9.14E-01
2.34E+00
7.63E-03
2.45E-03
7.94E-02
1.80E-01
3.74E-01
5.97E-01
2.35E-02
7.57E-03
2.28E-01
3.63E-01
6.77E-01
1.52E+00
1.39E+01
3.28E-01
6.73E-02
2.40E+00
6.32E+00
9.96E+00
2.39E+01
1.84E+01

Toxicity
Value
(Ig/L)
l.OOE+00
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
4.00E-01
2.00E+00
l.OOE-02
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
6.32E+00
4.00E-01
l.OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
6.32E+00
4.00E-01
l.OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
6.32E+00
4.00E-01
2.30E+01
l.OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
5.80E+02
6.32E+00
4.00E-01


Hazard
Quotient
7.08E-03
5.81E-04
1.43E-02
1.53E+00
5.36E-01
4.43E-02
1.85E-02
3.05E-03
9.96E-02
1.45E-01
5.86E+00
7.63E-03
4.89E-03
7.94E-04
2.22E-02
5.92E-02
1.49E+00
2.35E-02
1.51E-02
2.28E-03
4.47E-02
1.07E-01
3.81E+00
6.03E-01
3.28E-01
1.35E-01
2.40E-02
7.78E-01
7.12E-02
3.78E+00
4.60E+01

-------
                                       Table 26

            Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations (On and Off Base)
                   Mclntyre Brook Sediment and Toxicity Values - Zone 3
                              Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                                      (Continued)
  Location

Station 8059
Station 8058

Station 8057
Station 8056
Station 812
Station 811
        Chemical

PAHs
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Fluoranthene
PAHs
  Acenapthene
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
  Fluoranthene
  Fluorene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
4,4'-DDD
PAHs
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
  Fluoranthene
  Fluorene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
PAHs
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Pyrene
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
PAHs
  Anthracene
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Phenanthrene
Interstitial
   Water
Concentration
   (Ig/L)
                                                       5.43E+01
                                                       2.20E+00
                                                       4.70E-01
                                                       1.63E+01
                                                       1.61E-01
                                                       5.34E+01
                                                       1.25E+02
                                                       1.10E+02
   6.28E-01
Toxicity
 Value
 (Ig/L)
                      OOE+00
                      OOE+00
                    5.00E-01
                    l.OOE+02
                    l.OOE+02
                    8.12E+00
                    6.32E+00
                    4.00E-01

                    8.12E+00
 Hazard
Quotient
              2.72E+01
              2.20E+00
              9.40E-01
              1.63E-01
              1.61E-03
              6.58E+00
              1.97E+01
              2.75E+02

              7.73E-02
5.34E+01
5.24E+01
1.77E+00
3.05E-01
1.12E+01
1.06E-01
3.33E+01
8.14E+01
7.71E+01
8.74E+01
1.26E-03
1.92E+01
4.14E-01
9.59E-02
2.86E+00
2.40E-02
9.77E+00
1.75E+01
4.73E+01
2.54E+01
1.46E-02
1.37E-01
3.45E-01
9.63E-01
2.13E+00
5.95E+02
1.09E+01
1.09E-01
1.50E-02
8.69E-01
7.97E+00
2.30E+01
2. OOE+00
1. OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
5.80E+02
6.32E+00
4.00E-01
6.00E-02
2. OOE+00
1. OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
5.80E+02
6.32E+00
4.00E-01
1. OOE+00
l.OOE+02
8.12E+00
4.00E-01
3. OOE+00
3.36E+04
2. OOE+00
1. OOE+00
5.00E-01
l.OOE+02
6.32E+00
2.32E+00
2.62E+01
1.77E+00
6.10E-01
1.12E-01
1.06E-03
4.10E+00
1.40E-01
1.22E+01
2.19E+02
2.09E-02
9.58E+00
4.14E-01
1.92E-01
2.86E-02
2.40E-04
1.20E+00
3.01E-02
7.49E+00
6.36E+01
1.46E-02
1.37E-03
4.25E-02
2.41E+00
7.09E-01
1.64E-02
5.47E+00
1.09E-01
2.99E-02
8.69E-03
1.26E+00

-------
                                                            Table 27
        Metal

  Arsenic
  Barium
  Beryllium
  Copper
  Lead
  Manganese
  Thallium
  Vanadium
  Zinc
                                     Comparison of Sediment Concentrations to NOAA Biological
                                         Effect Levels for Lower Newfields Ditch - Zone 3
                                                   Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
Sediment Concentration in
  Lower Newfields Ditch
         (mg/kg)
 Average         Maximum
                                                                   NOAA Biological
                                                                    Effect Level
                                                                      (mg/kg)
                                                                 ER-L          ER-M
ER-L Hazard Quotient
Average      Maximum
  ER-M Hazard Quotient
Average        Maximum
6,
6,
4,
1.
6,
2,
1.
2,
9,
.70E+00
.70E+01
. OOE-01
.71E+01
.50E+01
.72E+02
. 10E+01
. 40E+01
.24E+01
1.
1.
1.
3,
1.
5,
3,
6,
2,
. 45E+01
. 30E+02
. 40E+00
. 44E+01
.50E+02
. 80E+02
.36E+01
.71E+01
. 30E+02
3.30E+01
NCA
NCA
70
3.50E+01
NCA
NCA
NCA
120
8.50E+01
NCA
NCA
390
1.10E+02
NCA
NCA
NCA
270
2,


2,
1.



7,
. 03E-01
NCA
NCA
.44E-01
. 86E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
.70E-01
4


4
4



1
.39E-01
NCA
NCA
.91E-01
.29E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
.69E+00
7


4
5



3
.88E-02
NCA
NCA
.38E-02
.91E-01
NCA
NCA
NCA
.42E-01
1


8
1



7
.71E-01
NCA
NCA
.83E-02
.36E+00
NCA
NCA
NCA
.52E-01
NCA = No criteria available.

-------
                                       Table 28

                     Comparison of Interstitial Water Concentrations
               Lower Newfields Ditch Sediment and Toxicity Values - Zone 3
                              Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFM, NH
  Location
Station 8140
Station 803
Station 802
        Chemical

Benzole acid *
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate*
PAHs
  Benzo(a)anthracene
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Chrysene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate*
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDT
PAHs
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Fluoranthene
  Phenanthrene
  Pyrene*
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate*
Alpha-chlordane
Gamma-chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDT
PAHs
  Benzo(a)pyrene
  Fluoranthene
Pentachlorophenol
Interstitial Water
Concentration
(Ig/L)
1.46E+02
5.92E-01
2.98E-03
8.94E-04
3.01E-02
8.76E-02
3.76E-01
2.64E-01
4.37E-01
4.76E-03
2.32E-03
4.10E-03
3.69E-01
7.95E-01
7.04E-01
4.80E-01
3.43E-02
1.67E-02
6.39E-02
1.11E-01
3.41E-03
5.49E-01
7.96E-01
Toxicity
Value

1
3
1
5
1
8
6
4
3
6
1
5
8
6
4
3
4
4
6
1
5
8
1
(Ig/L)
. 46E+05
. OOE+00
. OOE+00
. OOE-01
. OOE+02
. 12E+00
.32E+00
.OOE-01
.OOE+00
. OOE-02
. OOE-03
.OOE-01
. 12E+00
.32E+00
.OOE-01
.OOE+00
.30E-03
.30E-03
.OOE-02
.OOE-03
.OOE-01
. 12E+00
. 16E+01
Hazard
Quotient
9.98E-04
1.97E-01
2.98E-03
1.79E-03
3.01E-04
1.08E-02
5.94-02
6.60E-01
1.46E-01
7.93E-02
2.32+00
8.19E-03
4.54E-02
1.26E-01
1.76E+00
1.60E-01
7.98E+00
3.89E+00
1.07E+00
1.11E+02
6.82E-03
6.76E-02
6.88E-02
Chemical was included although it was not detected above background concentrations.

-------
                                         Table 29

                        Alternatives Retained for Detailed Analysis
                              Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH

            Detailed
       Analysis Alternative                  Description

     Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook

           1     No action - Always considered,  as required by CERCLA).
           2     Limited action - Surface water and sediment monitoring in Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks.
                 Reliance on source control activities and natural attenuation to restore sediment and
                 surface water quality.
           3     Excavation of selected sediment from Pauls and Mclntyre Brooks, off-site
                 treatment/disposal, and surface water and sediment quality monitorinq.

Note: Initial screeninq and detailed analysis of alternatives are contained in the Zone 1 FS Report for
Pauls Brook and the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Report for Mclntyre Brook. The comparative
analysis of alternatives is contained in the Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report.

-------
Table 30
Summary of Detailed Alternatives Evaluation a
Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
Remedial Alternative

1. No Action.
2. Limited action (surface water
and sediment monitoring).
3. Excavation of selected Pauls
Brook and Mclntyre Brook
sediment and off-site disposal.
Protection
of Human Health
and Environment
Ranking

BC
AB
Compliance with
ARARs Ranking
C
C

AB
Long-Term
Effectiveness
Ranking
BC
B
Reduction in TMV of
Contaminants Through
Treatment Ranking
Short-Term
Effectiveness
Ranking
B
AB

AB
Implementability
Ranking
AB
AB
Cost Analysis b
(in $1,000)
26.2
661

1,182
a The letter ranking system is described in Subsection 4.4.3 of the Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation/Feasibility study Report.
b Estimated costs represent the 30-year present-worth cost. Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix B of the Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation/Feasibility study
Report.
TMV = Toxicity, mobility, and volume.

-------
                                                            Table 31
                                                   Cleanup Goal Selection for
                                                  Pauls Brook Sediment - Zone 1
                                                  Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
       Chemical
       Organics
Benzole acid
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexvl)phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Dibenzofuran
Toluene
PAHs  (total)
       Pesticides/PCBs
Aldrin
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Dieldrin
4,4' -DDE
4,4' -ODD
4,4' -DDT
Heptachlor epoxide
       Inorganics
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Sodium
Vanadium
Zinc


Ecological
Criterion a
(mg/kg)
33,320
NCA
27.5
NCA
0.379
NCA
93.6
NCA
NCA
0.0232
0.0232
NCA
2.39
264,000
0.0209
0.00002
NCA
33.0
NCA
NCA
NCA
5.00
NCA
80.0
NCA
70.0
NCA
35.0
NCA
NCA
30.0
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
120.0
Maximum
Detected
Background
Concentration
(mg/kg)
0.720
ND
0.750
ND
ND
ND
0.024
8.94
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14,300
12.2
52.5
0.830
ND
ND
3,330
53.0
14.4
23.2
21,900
42.1
6,450
358.0
46.7
2.840
ND
9,840
542.0
35.7
105.0
Risk-Based
Maximum Concentration b
Detected Cleanup Level
Concentration (mg/kg)
(mg/kg) (LE-HE)
0.290
0.086
1.70
0.002
0.110
0.200
0.056
92.4
3.70
3.90 14.5-58
3.40 17.1-68.2
0.0260
120.0 8.58-34.3
1,200 102-405
2.1 2.11-8.44
0.540 NC
43,000
130.0
317.0
1.2
11.5
10.1 0.153-0.613
12,000
133.0
39.5
139.0
92,000
558.0 12.2-48.7
9,670
22,900
95.9
819.0
2.80
7,500
536.0
168.0
868.0


Cleanup
Goal
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.94
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.58
102
2.11
NA
NA
33.0
NA
NA
NA
0.153
NA
80.0
NA
70.0
NA
42.1
NA
NA
46.7

NA
NA
NA
NA
120.0

-------
a ER-Ls for inorganics, EqP values for organics.
b Risk-based concentration cleanup levels were calculated for chemicals of potential concern identified by EPA.
NA = Not applicable.
NCA = No criteria available.
ND = Not detected.
LE-HE = LE is based on an HQ of 1 for low exposure, and HE is based on an HQ of 10 for high exposure.
NC = Not calculated. Chemical was not detected in either earthworms or sediment.

-------
                                             Table 32

                  Sediment Cleanup Goals for Organics In Mclntyre Brook - Zone 3
                                 Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
          Organic Compound
Bis (2-ethylhexyl)pthalate
PAHs (total)
   Maximum
   Detected
Concentration
   (Ig/kg)
990
 78,400
     Maximum
      Hazard
     Quotient
Based on EgP Values
       0.757
        NCA
   Maximum
Concentration
 Detected at
  Background
   Location
   (Ig/kg)
     750
    8,940
 NCAA Criteria       Cleanup
 ER-L     ER-M        Goal
(Ig/kg)   (Ig/kg)     (Ig/kg)
 NCA      NCA         NC
 4,000    35,000      8,490
NC = No cleanup goal reguired because the HQ did not exceed 1.
NCA = No criteria value available.

-------
                                                 Table 33
Maximum
Detected
Inorganic
Analyte
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Magnesium
Nickel
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(mg/kg)
31,100
17.2
517
2.5
35.1
3,740
70.9
22.9
46.6
51,100
355
604
11,500
52.3
47.1
95.5
193
                                   Sediment Cleanup Goals for Inorganics in
                                           Mclntyre Brook - Zone 3
                                       Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
                                         Maximum Concentration
                                        Detected at Background
                                               Location
                                                (mg/kg)

                                                14,300
                                                 12.2
                                                 52.5
                                                 0.83
                                                  NA
                                                 3,330
                                                  53
                                                 14.4
                                                 23.2
                                                21,900
                                                 42.1
                                                  358
                                                 6,450
                                                 46.7
                                                  NA
                                                 35.7
                                                 105
NOAA
ER-L
(mg/kg)
NCA
33
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
80
NCA
70
NCA
35
NCA
NCA
30
NCA
NCA
120
Criteria
ER-M
(mg/ky)
NCA
85
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
145
NCA
390
NCA
110
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
NCA
270
Cleanup
Goal
(mg/kg)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
42.1
NA
NA
46.7
NA
NA
120
NA = Not applicable. Maximum detected concentration was below background or the NOAA ER-L,  or had no
     associated criteria value.
NCA = No criteria value available.

-------
                                                                     Table 34
Media

Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
                                    ARARs for the Selected Remedy - Excavation of Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook
                                                  Sediment with Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal
                                                           Brooks/Ditches, Pease AFB, NH
         Requirement
CHEMICAL SPECIFIC
Federal-CWA-Ambient Water Quality
Criteria (AWQC)  Protection of
Freshwater Aquatic Life
FEDERAL-EPA Risk Reference Doses
(RFDs)
FEDERAL-EPA  Carcinoqen Assessment
Group Policy Factors
           Requirement Synopsis

AWQC are developed under the Clean Water Act
 (CWA) as quidelines from which states develop
water quality standards, AWQC for aquatic life are
relevant and appropriate when protection of aquatic
orqanisms is beinq considered at a site.

RfDs are dose levels developed based on
noncarcinoqenic effects and are used to develop
Hazard Indices. A Hazard Index of less than or
equal to 1 is considered acceptable.

Potency Factors are developed by the EPA from
Health Effects Assessments or evaluation by the
Carcinoqenic Assessment Group and are used to
develop excess cancer risks. A ranqe of 10 -4 to 10 -6
is considered acceptable.
     Action To Be Taken To
      Attain Requirements

AWQC were used in the development of
sediment cleanup qoals.
EPA RfDs have been used to characterize
risks resultinq from exposure to
contaminants in surface water and
sediment.

EPA Carcinoqenic Potency Factors have
been used to compute the individual
incremental cancer risk resultinq from
exposure to site contamination in surface
water and sediment. Risk levels have been
found to be <10  -4 in surface water and
sediment
   Status

Relevant and
 Appropriate
                                                                                                                                                                   TBC
                                                                                                                                                                   TBC
Sediment
Sediment
FEDERAL-EPA Interim Sediment
Criteria Values for Non-Polar
Hydrophobic Orqanic Contaminants
(EPA May 1986)

FEDERAL-NCAA Environmental
Effects Ranqe-Low (ER-L)  and Median
(ER-M). Technical Memorandum NOS
OMA 52.
Establishes screeninq values for contaminants in
sediments.
Identifies contaminant concentration levels at which
bioloqical effects are first observed in aquatic
species in estuarine environments.
Screeninq values were used as quidance
for establishinq cleanup qoals.
ER-L values were used as quidance for
establishinq cleanup qoals.
                                                                                                                                                                    TBC
                                                                                                                                                                    TBC

-------
Table 34
Media

Sediment
Wetlands, Rivers
ARARs for the Selected Remedy - Excavation of Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook
Sediment with Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal
Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
(Continued)
Requirement

STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Ws 432
Surface Water Quality Standards
(SWQS). RSA 485A:8
LOCATION SPECIFIC
FEDERAL-Executive Order 11990
Protection of Wetlands. 40 CFR Part
6 - Appendix A
Requirement Synopsis

Surface water classification standards for Class B
waters are applicable to the site. New Hampshire
Surface Water Quality standards for toxic pollutants
in Class B waters are essentially the same as Federal
Ambient Water Quality Criteria.

Under this Order, federal aqencies are required to
minimize destruction, loss, or deqradation of
wetlands, or beneficial values of wetlands.
Identifies federal aqencies that must be consulted
when wetlands are to be altered. Outlines how
aqencies are to interact. 40 CFR 6. Appendix A
contains the EPA policy for carryinq out the
provisions of EO 11990.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements

SWQS have been considered in the
development of sediment cleanup qoals.
Sediments exceedinq cleanup qoals will be
excavated.
Remedial activities will be conducted as
to minimize harm to wetlands.
Appropriate federal aqencies (identified
under this Act) will be contacted and
allowed to review the proposed work plan
prior to sediment excavation in Mclntyre
and Pauls Brooks and surroundinq
wetlands.
Status

Relevant and
Appropriate to the
extent more strinqent
than federal AWQC.
Applicable
Wetlands, Rivers
Wetlands, Rivers
FEDERAL-CWA Section 404:40 CFR
Part 230 and 320-330
FEDERAL-16 USC 661 et seq., Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act
Requirements requlate the discharqe of dredqed or
fill material into water bodies or wetlands and
require mitiqation for any such discharqes.
Requires actions to be taken to avoid adverse
effects, minimize potential harm to fish or wildlife,
and preserve natural and beneficial uses of the land.
Excavated sediments will be disposed of Applicable
off-site. If clean fill is added,
requirements will be met. Moreover, impacts
to wetlands from sediment excavation will be
mitiqated.

Relevant federal aqencies will be contacted Applicable
to help analyze effects of remedial action
on wildlife in the wetlands in Mclntyre and
Pauls Brooks and the surroundinq
wetlands. Remedial activities will be
conducted so as to minimize adverse
impacts.

-------
Table 34
Media

Wetlands, Rivers
ARARs for the Selected Remedy - Excavation Of Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook
Sediment with Off-Base Treatment and/or Disposal
Brooks/Ditches, Pease KFB, NH
(Continued)
Requirement

STATE-RSA 485 A-17 NH Admin. Code
Env-Ws 415, Rules Relative to
Prevention of Pollution from Dredging,
Filling, Mining, Transporting, and
Construction
Requirement Synopsis

Establish criteria for conducting any activity in or
near surface water, which significantly alters terrain
or may otherwise adversely affect water quality,
impede runoff, or create unnatural runoff.
Action To Be Taken To
Attain Requirements

Erosion control measures will he taken
during sediment excavation, Areas
excavated will be backfilled and regraded.
Status

Applicable
Wetlands, Rivers
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous Waste
STATE-RSA 482-A. NH Admin. Code
Env-Wt 300, 400, 600. New Hampshire
Criteria and Conditions for Fill and
Dredging in Wetlands

ACTION SPECIFIC
FEDERAL-RCRA 40 CFR Part 264.
Standards Applicable to Generators of
Hazardous Waste
STATE RSA 147A-NH Hazardous Waste
Management Control Act and Hazardous
Waste Rules. Env-Wm 100-1000
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm 400-
404 - Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste
STATE-NH Admin. Code Env-Wm
707.03 - Waste Pile Requirements
Any activity in or adjacent to wetlands, including
rolling and dredging, must meet these criteria for
protection of fish, wildlife, commerce, and public
recreation.
RCRA Subtitle C establishes standards applicable to
treatment, storage, transport, and disposal of
hazardous waste and the closure of hazardous waste
facilities.
Standards for management of hazardous waste
facilities. Operate in lieu of federal RCRA Subtitle
requirements.
Requirements for identification and listing of
hazardous waste.
Incorporates by reference the requirements of 40
CFR 264. Subpart L governing waste piles.
Proposed work adjacent to the wetlands Applicable
and Mclntyre and Pauls Brooks will be
reviewed by the Wetlands Board and will
comply with substantive state welland
protection requirements.

Sediments will be analyzed to determine Relevant and
whether they contain characteristic Appropriate
hazardous waste. If so, management of
hazardous waste as part of CERCLA
response must comply with substantive
requirements of these regulations. Has
effect through state hazardous waste
requirements, NH Hazardous Waste
Management Act and Rules. ENV-Wm
100-1000, which operate in lieu of federal
regulations. See discussion of NH
hazardous waste requirements below.

Sediments will be analyzed to determine See following
whether they constitute characteristic section by
waste. If so, handling and disposal of section analysis
sediments must comply with these
regulations. Requirements are listed

Excavated sediments will be analyzed to Applicable
determine whether they are hazardous
prior to disposal. Sediments testing
positive will be disposed of in a licensed
TSD facility.

The excavated sediments stockpiled at the Applicable
site prior to off-site disposal will comply
with these requirements.

-------
                                                    APPENDIX B

                                            DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE




Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr.
Acting Director, Air Force Base Conversion Agency
1700 North Moore Street, Suite 2300
Arlington, VA 22209-2802

Re:           Record of Decision for the Brooks and Ditches at the Pease Air Force Base
              Superfund Site; Newington and Portsmouth, New Hampshire

Subject:      Declaration of Concurrence

Dear Mr. Lowas:

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (Department) has reviewed and concurs with the
"Record of Decision for the Brooks/Ditches" (ROD)  for the Pease Air Force Base(Pease AFB) Superfund Site
in Newington and Portsmouth, New Hampshire. This ROD addresses the remedial actions necessary to address
potential threats to human health, welfare and the environment in: Flagstone Brook (Zone 1); Pauls Brook
(Zone 1); Mclntyre Brook (Zone 3); and Lower Newfields. Ditch  (Zone 3), which resulted from releases of
hazardous substances at various sites at Pease AFB. The Brooks and Ditches ROD documents the remedial
actions to be taken in Mclntyre Brook and Pauls Brook and the basis for determining that no further
action is necessary under CERCLA to protect human health and the environment at Flagstone Brook and Lower
Newfields Ditch.

The Air Force prepared the Brooks and Ditches ROD in accordance with the provisions of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 as amended by the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (CERCLA).  As a party to the "Pease Federal Facility Agreement Under
CERCLA Section 120" (Pease FFA),  the State has participated in the oversight of the Air Force's Remedial
Investigations and Feasibility Studies at all sites on-base. In a letter dated September 16,1993, the
State concurred with the Source Area ROD for Landfill 5 which, was fast-tracked in order to accelerate
the implementation of the actions necessary at the landfill to contain the primary source of groundwater
contamination, a portion of which discharges to Flagstone Brook. In order to enable the expeditious
implementation of source control measures and ensure that all potential threats to human health and the
environment in the ditches were thoroughly investigated and evaluated, the State also concurred with the
decision to incorporate Flagstone Brook, Pauls Brook, Mclntyre Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch into a
basewide surface water operable unit.

The selected remedy includes the excavation of sediment associated with Pauls Brook and Mclntyre Brook.
The excavated sediment will be treated and/or disposed of off base at an asphalt batching facility, a
Subtitle D landfill, or a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA) transportation, storage, and
disposal  (TSD) facility, as deemed necessary at the time of remediation. The selected remedy also
includes sedimentation and erosion control during excavation, restoration of wetlands impacted or
destroyed by sediment excavation at Pauls Brook, and long-term environmental monitoring at Pauls Brook
and Mclntyre Brook. No actions are necessary under CERCLA to ensure the protection of human health and
the environment at Flagstone Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch.

State Concurrence

The State reviewed all information in the Brooks and Ditches Administrative Record, evaluated the
cumulative risks associated with current and future potential exposures to the contaminants whose
presence is associated with a CERCLA release and determined the actions set forth in the Brooks and
Ditches ROD are consistent with the reguirements of CERCLA. As a party to the Pease FFA, and acting as
agent for the State of New Hampshire, the Department concurs with the no-action decisions selected under
CERCLA for Flagstone Brook and Lower Newfields Ditch and the selected remedy for Mclntyre Brook and Pauls
Brook.

-------
Letter to Albert F. Lowas, Jr.
Re: Brooks and Ditches ROD Declaration of Concurrence
September 24, 1997
Page 2

In striving to achieve the maximum benefit with limited public  (and private) resources, the State
continues to seek reasonable and practical solutions to the often costly and complex environmental
challenges associated with contaminated site cleanups. Through the partnership and dedication exhibited
by all parties, the rapid implementation of the actions necessary to protect human health and the
environment will serve to expedite the achievement of our mutual environmental goals and facilitate
efforts to restore the local economy in order to protect the welfare of those in the communities
surrounding Pease AFB. As always, the Department stands ready to provide the guidance and assistance the
Air Force may reguire in order to take the actions necessary to protect human health and the environment
in a complete and cost-effective manner.



cc:      Harry T. Stewart, P.E., DES-HWRB
         Carl W. Baxter, P.E., DES-HWRB
         Martha A. Moore, Esg.,  NHDOJ-AGO
         Jerry Dexter, PDA
         Michael J. Daly, EPA-New England
         Arthur L. Ditto, P.E.,  AFBCA- OL"A"

-------
                                         APPENDIX C

                                   RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY

OVERVIEW

The Air Force issued the Pease AFB Brooks & Ditches Operable Unit  (BSD OU) Proposed Plan to the public in
February 1997. In this Proposed Plan, the Air Force identified its preferred alternative for the two
brooks requiring remedial action, the other brooks and ditches that make up the BSD OU were identified as
requiring no Anther action. The selection of these preferred alternatives by the Air Force was
coordinated with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  (USEPA) New England Region, and the New
Hampshire Department of Environmental Services  (NMES).

The following subsections provide the background on community involvement with the BSD OU activities, and
the Air Force's response to comments received during the Proposed Plan public comment period of 19
February to 21 March 1997.

BACKGROUND ON COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Prior to the start of the public comment period for the BSD OU Proposed Plan, the Air Force issued the
Proposed Plan in a fact sheet format. A presentation on the status of work conducted and results of the
sampling at the BSD OU were made to the Pease Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board - Technical
Review Committee (RAB-TRC). Additionally, the content of the Proposed Plan was presented to and discussed
with the members of the RAB-TRC. Notifications announcing the beginning of the BSD OU Proposed Plan
comment period were mailed to all individuals on the Pease AFB mailing list in early February 1997, along
with a copy of the Proposed Plan. A press release also was issued to the media announcing the public
hearing. Newspaper announcements (advertisements) were published prior to the public hearing date of 5
March 1997.

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE COMMENT PERIOD AND THE AIR FORCE RESPONSES

Two written comments were received on the Brooks & Ditches Operable Unit Proposed Plan during the comment
period; the remainder of the comments were received verbally at the public hearing. The following
provides a summary of each comment and respective Air Force response.

WRITTEN COMMENTS

1. Comment: SCOPE is in agreement with the Proposed Plan that the no further action recommendation for
   the Lower Newfields Ditch and Flagstone Brook is a viable option for these two sites.

Response: The Air Force acknowledges SCOPE'S agreement.

2. Comment: As for Paul's Brook and Mclntyre Brook, SCOPE supports the Air Force's preferred alternative
   of excavating the contaminated sediment, sediment and erosion control, off-site disposal, wetlands
   restoration and long-term monitoring.

Response: The Air Force acknowledges SCOPE'S support.

3. Comment: As with all remediation proposals SCOPE has been involved in, and as a member of the
   Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee, long-term monitoring is a concern we feel must
   be seriously considered by the Air Force in relation to an Air Force presence at Pease. It is our
   contention the long-term monitoring, and Air Force presence, and community involvement go hand-in-hand
   in providing the right ingredients for good community relations between the Air Force and the
   communities surrounding Pease. A long-term Air Force presence is as important as the long-term
   monitoring of Pease sites. One compliments the other, and in so doing, the communities know they have
   a link to the decision.

Response: The Air Force understands SCOPE'S and Seacoast Communities' desire for continued Air Force
presences at Pease during the long-term monitoring process. The Air Force will take the communities'
preferences into account when developing its future management plans for Pease AFB.

4. Comment: I think it's a total waste of time, a total waste of money, to even think of spending over a
   million dollars on the ditch named Mclntyre Brook which runs by the Smith property. It's not needed.

   To pacify abutters no action will not do it; therefore, limited action and/or monitoring would be
   appropriate, but clearly excavation is not warranted at this late date since the Air Force has been

-------
long gone and that ditch has long since been flushed out by Mother Nature.

I don't remember that the right of way for that ditch was mentioned but the R.O.W. is at least 50 feet
wide; or is it 100 feet wide? The ditch has been flushed out by rain, grass has grown throughout the
distance of that brook/ditch, trees have taken hold, and the ditch/brook is hardly noticeable anymore.
Leave well enough alone.

Response: The Air Force understands the need to be sensitive to cost when selecting remedial actions.
However, results from the ecological risk assessment as well as sediment toxicity tests conducted by the
Air Force indicated adverse impacts to aguatic organisms from contaminated sediments. Therefore, removal
of these contaminated sediments from Mclntyre Brook is reguired. As always, the Air Force will continue
its efforts to maintain a proper balance between cost and environmental protectiveness in the
implementation of remedial actions at Pease.

VERBAL COMMENTS:

1. Comment: You're going to remove sand or gravel that have filled the holes, or what are you going to
do?

Response: For Paul's Brook the Air Force will be excavating an area of approximately one acre to a depth
of about two feet. After which the area, which is a wetland, will be restored as a wetland. For Mclntyre
Brook the Air Force will be removing areas where sediments that contain contaminants above cleanup goals
have been deposited.

2. Comment: What about people who have wells, is there any measuring of any contamination of water from
wells in the area?

Response: The Air Force has evaluated groundwater issues base-wide, and has looked at all the potential
sources of contamination. The Air Force is addressing all sources of groundwater contamination, refer to
previous public hearings and previous remedial action decisions. For Mclntyre Brook, the Brook is a
receiver of contamination from surface runoff at the Base. There is no indication that contamination in
Mclntyre Brook would effect any drinking wells as groundwater flow is into the Brook area versus away
from the Brook.

3. Comment: As far as trees, they've been really good so far. There's no problem with them continuing to
stand, is there, as far as their being contaminated with whatever they've taken into the system in
their roots?

Response: The root systems of the trees along Mclntyre Brook are not in the actual ditch line but
adjacent to the Brook banks. There is no indication or reason to believe that adjacent trees are effected
by any of the contaminated sediments within the Brook ditch line.

4. Comment: There are beavers out there; is there any effect to them? Obviously, they eat the trees.

Response: Since there is no indication that trees are impacted by the Brook (see response to Comment #3
above) the beavers are not being effected.

5. Comment: My guestion is, you mentioned monitoring for a four or five year period, perhaps make sure
the excavation of the contamination is effective. What's to prevent future conducements on the runway
just undoing all that you've done, and is there a sort of authority that you have with the operators
of the runway so that you can immediately call to their attention any kind of problem that they may be
creating in what you have just cleaned up? And I ask that because my concern is, I think I understand
that the property that is under a long-term lease to the Pease Development Authority, and I wonder,
ultimately, who is responsible for their actions so that we, as taxpayers, are assured all this is
money spent to really the best advantage?

Response: Potential future re-contamination of Mclntyre Brook is a legitimate concern. The Air Force is
responsible for addressing contamination that has resulted from its past activities. Monitoring of
current and future redevelopment activities that may impact surface water guality in Mclntyre Brook is
now the responsibility of the Pease Development Authority (PDA) under permit issued by USEPA and NHDES.
This permit is called a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit, where the PDA is reguired
to monitor various surface water outfalls, including Mclntyre Brook. Both USEPA and NHDES have the
responsibility for enforcement of this permit.

6. Comment: My only concern is, and I'm sure that there's low demand for it, creates situations, as far
as drainage ditches, like those coming off of Pease, and I wondered if the cost of clean-up -- and, of

-------
course, I want to see the ditches cleaned up, -- but I just wanted to make sure that this was just not
going to be something that was monitored for six years, and then, there was going to be a slowly
built-up sediments over the next 30 years the same as it was before.

Response: As stated in response +o Comment #5 above, the Air Force will correct effects of its past
activities on Mclntyre Brook. Monitoring of current and future activities that may negatively impact
surface water guality in Mclntyre Brook is the responsibility of the PDA under the NPDES permit issued by
USEPA and NHDES. The Air Force does agree that a parties need to be concerned about future redevelopment
activities and ensure that the activities do not undo what the Air Force is doing as part of the cleanup
efforts as Pease.

7. Comment: I just had a couple of guestions about maybe some of the sediment that would end up in the
bay, if anybody has looked into that, and what kind of sediments are in there?

Response: As part of the characterization work at Mclntyre Brook the Air Force sampled from the start of
the Brook to Great Bay. Contaminant levels in Mclntyre Brook at the bay did not exceed regulatory
standards or exceed any acceptable risk levels. Therefore, it was unnecessary to sample sediment in Great
Bay itself.

8. Comment: Quite often there's a stench comes out of that brook, which is -- I don't know how to explain
what is smells like, but it's always been there. It's not like any other fresh water stream that I've
smelled, and I just wondered if that's maybe because of the sediment that's in there, or if you had
any idea about it?

Response: The Air Force has not found any odor issue associated with the sediments. The odd odor may be
attributable to biological decomposition activity, especially in the areas of Mclntyre Brook that are
effected by tidal activity of the Great Bay.

9. Comment: I have a guestion about that oil separator. Is that functional? Is that working the way it's
supposed to be working?

Response: The oil/water separator is functional and is working as designed. By design, during low water
flows in the drainage system, water is diverted through the separator. During high flows (storm events)
water bypasses the separator.

10. Comment: I'm highly in support of the plan here. This has been a long time in coming. I thoroughly
support it.

Response: The Air Force acknowledges the commenter's support.

11. Comment: Do all the abutters get notified, or just certain ones?

Response: Notification of Proposed Plan comment periods and public hearings is done using the most
current Air Force mailing list for Pease. If individuals names are not on the mailing list, including
abutters to Pease, they will not receive a direct mailing. From the interest shown in this action, the
Air Force will take steps to notify abutters to the Mclntyre Brook area of future activities.

12. Comment: As part of the action, will you be notifying, publicly, the action that's going to happen?

Response: Yes, in this case notification will be provided prior to the start of construction activities.
This notification will be to abutter's to the Mclntyre Brook area (see response to Comment #11).

13. Comment: What I want to know is, what's the time frame for this, what you call proposal that you're
putting forward; what's the time frame for that?

Response: It is the Air Force's goal to have this work completed in the August/September time period of
this year.

14. Comment: So, you then will get a hold of all the abutters and let them know what's going on, so then
I don't have to go out there and ask them -- like I usually do -- going, "Hey, who are you; what are
you doing?"

Response: Yes, as stated in response to Comments #11 and # 12, the Air Force will provide notification to
abutters prior to the start of construction, detailing the planned construction activities.

15. Comment: You pretty much figure that it's going to be a couple of months, then, that you're going to
be out there.

-------
Response: Yes, that is the Air Force's goal.

16. Comment: What kind of workdays are you talking; are you talking early in the morning until late at
night, or are you talking an eight to five job?

Response: Typically the Air Force's contractors work 4-10 hour days. Work hours being 6:00 AM to 4:00
PM.

17. Comment: I was going to say, I don't start my lawnmower until 8:00 because Timmy gets after me.
"Don't start until 8:00." We watch that clock pretty close.

Response: Once the work gets close to the residential area the Air Force will ensure that the contractor
doesn't start any noisy type work before 8:00 AM.

18. Comment: You used the scenario of drops of oil on your shirt, and then the seepage into the water and
the retention on the shirt. What's been determined from the sediments in Mclntyre Brook; how long do
those sediments stay there, you know?

Response: Sediment deposits do not necessarily go away. The issue is with the contamination that is
contained within the sediment matrix. What the Air Force has measured is how much of the contamination
that may be contained within the sediment matrices leach or leak out to the water in the Brook.

19. Comment: So, how much has been left behind, percentage; can you determine that or not?

Response: The process used to determine acceptable contamination levels that can be left behind does not
measure it in a percentage but rather a ratio, in this case in parts per billion. The cleanup goals
specified in the Proposed Plan is what has been determined as the maximum levels that can be left behind.

20. Comment: Now, when they do that, when they do that excavation and do all that work, will they be
wearing contaminant suits, like they did on Mclntyre, on Mclntyre Road? You know how you put the
pipes, and everything; you'd seen them in their white suits and their masks, and everything. Are they
going to be doing that over there too?

Response: No, the contaminant levels are very low and don't warrant special personal protection for
workers. It must be remembered that the risk assessment process showed unacceptable risk to human health.
The issue that is being dealt with at Mclntyre Brook is risk to the ecology, that is, plants and animals.

21. Comment: Specifically, the guestions that I had, I'll be by area. On the Flagstone Brook that will
reguire no further action, the pipeline that was going to go through and cut across that brook, I
believe they're going to a pipeline underneath the Flagstone Brook, from what they tell me; has there
been any particular sampling in the area where they're going to dig pipeline, to see if the soil has
got contaminants in it, or do you intend to do any, at the time that they go do their excavation?

Response: The Air Force doesn't see the need to sample any of the soil in the area where the pipeline
will cross under Flagstones Brook. In the area where the pipeline intersects Flagstones the sediments
were "clean", i.e. within acceptable levels, therefore, there is no reason to believe there would be a
problem with the soils underlying the Brook.

22. Comment: In the Paul's Brook area, are you going to take any, pull actual soil out of the Paul's
Brook area, and will reguire cutting and removing any of the trees, as far as the forest area? Could
you estimate how many of the trees or how much of an area it's going to be?

Response: The plan is to excavate the contaminated sediments in the Paul's Brook area. This will reguire
the removal of trees that lie within the area where excavation is reguired. Based upon information
available at the time of the Proposed Plan, the area of excavation is estimated to be one to one and a
half acres.

23. Comment: Is there a plan to replant any large trees at the edge of the wetlands, because what you're
obviously opening up is guite a view from the Spaulding Turnpike into the Base, and to the Air
National Guard area?

Response: Based upon this comment, the first step the Air Force will take will be to minimize, to the
extent possible, the loss of any large trees. If, as a result of the excavation process, a large visible
area is opened up, the Air Force will plant trees as part of site restoration process.

24. Comment: As far as the downstream of Paul's Brook, you indicated that there's some ponds around the
malls that are actually stopping points for the brook, as it continues down towards the Piscatagua

-------
River. Have those particular ponds in the Fox Run Mall been sampled for sediments, at all?

Response: As stated during the presentation portion of the Public Hearing, characterization sampling
started at the beginning of the brooks and proceeded downstream to a point where the sediments and/or
surface water sampling results were "clean", i.e. within acceptable levels. This "clean" location for
Paul's Brook was at a point before the Brook flows under the Spaulding Turnpike, well upstream of the
ponds at the Fox Run Mall. Therefore, it was not necessary to sample the ponds at the Mall.

25. Comment: Essentially, there was no need to then. Looking at the other side, on the west side of the
runway on Mclntyre Brook.

Response: That is correct.

26. Comment: Just one last comment and that is, with the excavation of soil and the extensive work that
you're going to do there, has the underground drainage ditches that lead into that brook that go
under the runway already, have they already been flushed and cleaned, or are they still going to be
— do you still have to do that before excavating the soil?

Response: As part of the storm water carrying process of the drainage piping, there is a natural flushing
process of sediment materials that might collect in drainage piping. Based upon investigative work done
at Pease, particularly for the Fuel Hydrant System, there does not appear to be a residual sediment
problem associated with the drainage piping that leads to Mclntyre Brook.

29. Comment: One of the plans that has been promoted by the PDA is a green belt around the areas, to
extend the golf course up to the midpoint, and I just wondered if, with the contamination of Mclntyre
Brook on the base, if that is all going to removed so that it's something that they continue to need
to do, or is that something that will support recreational use next to the ground line?

Response: The work area for Mclntyre Brook is between the top of banks, an area approximately 50 feet
wide. Mclntyre Brook will be continued to be used to carry runoff flow from the Tradeport. Other than
ensuring that future development does not impact the design function of Mclntyre Brook, from an Air Force
environmental perspective, there is no reason future development can't occur in that area.

-------
APPENDIX D

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FIIiE INDEX

FOR THE

INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM

PEASE AIR FORCE BASE
NEW HAMPSHIRE

SEPTEMBER 1997

ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE

Under section 113(k) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA), the U.S. Air Force is required to establish an administrative record file for every Superfund
response action and to make a copy of the administrative record available at or near the site.

Due to funding and space limitation, and based on guidance received from EPA Region I, the Air Force has
established one administrative file for Pease Air Force Base which encompasses environmental response
actions base-wide. Since access to Pease is unrestricted, both the information repository and the
administrative record file are housed on base. Although similar in nature, the information repository
contains general information about the Air Force's Installation Restoration Program while the
administrative record documents the specific decision-making process leading to response actions.

Although draft documents are not usually placed in an administrative record, the Air Force and EPA Region
I decided to temporarily house draft documents in the Pease administrative record. Draft documents in the
administrative record are pulled and replace with final documents as soon as the final documents are
available. The Air Force and EPA Region I believe that this policy allows for an overall more complete
administrative record.

The administrative record serves two purposes, according to EPA guidance. First the record contains those
documents which form the basis for the selection of a response action and under section 113 (j) of CERCLA
judicial review of any issue concerning the adequacy of any response action is limited to the
administrative record. This does not mean that only documents which support a response decision are
placed in the record. Relevant documents that were considered but ultimately rejected are also included
in the record to better establish the decision-making process.

Second, CERCLA section 113(k) requires that the administrative record act as a vehicle for public
participation. Participation by interested citizens ensures that the concerns of the public will be
addressed during the response selection process. The administrative record file must be reasonably
available for public review during normal business hours. The record file should be treated as a
non-circulating reference document. This will allow the public greater access to the volumes and also
minimize the risk of loss or damage. Individuals may photocopy any documents in the non-confidential
portion of the file.

Major documents in the Pease Air Force Base administrative record are shelved by specific zone. For
example, documents pertinent to Zone 1 are shelved together and are kept separate from documents
pertaining to other zones. Documents relevant to all zones are together in a general area and are shelved
in accordance with the structure of the administrative record. In addition, the administrative record
index is cross-referenced to facilitate the location of documents related to specific zones.

The documents in the administrative record file may become lost or damaged during use. If this occurs,
contact the administrative record file manager at Pease Air Force Base. Documents may be added to the
administrative record file as site work progresses. This index will be updated quarterly to reflect
documents added to the administrative record file.

The administrative record file will be maintained in Building 43 at Pease AFB. Questions and/or comments
about the administrative record file should be directed to:
Arthur L. Ditto, Remedial Project Manager
Air Force Base Conversion Agency
Operating Location A, Building 43
61 International Drive
Pease AFB, NH 03803-0157
(603) 430-2586

-------
                ABOUT THE INDEX NUMBERING SYSTEM
Document Number -
 Comprised  of  a  3  letter  site  code  (PEA) ,  the  category number,  the  entry number and
 the  page range  of a  document.  (Both page  numbers  will be  the  same  for a one  page
 document.)  If documents  are eventually placed on  a  microfiche system,  the  document
 number  consists of the site code followed by  the  microfilm reel  and frame  number.

        Example: PEA  (1.1)  #1  001-031
Site Code
PEA
(Category  #)
 (1.1)
Entry #
#1
Page Range
001-031
Long Title

Author


Recipient

Date

Type

Second Reference

Location
       The long title and brief description of document.

        Indicates  author  or  primary originator of  document.  If a
        contractor prepared  the  document,  indicates  company  and location.

        Indicates  primary recipient of  document.

        Indicates  date document  was issued.

        Indicates  document type

        Other  categories  pertaining to  the document.

        Exact  location(s)  of document.

-------
                   ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE STRUCTURE

1.0    SITE IDENTIFICATION
       1.1        Background - RCRA and other Information
       1.2        Notification/Site Inspection Reports
       1.3        Preliminary Assessment (PA) Report
       1.4        Site Investigation (SI)  Report
       1.5        Previous Operable Unit Information
       1.6        Correspondence

2.0    REMOVAL RESPONSES
       2.1        Sampling and Analysis Plans
       2.2        Sampling and Analysis Data / Chain of Custody
       2.3        EE/CA Approval Memorandum  (Non-Time-Critical Removals)
       2.4        EE/CA (Engineering Evaluation / Cost Analysis)
       2.5        Action Memorandum
       2.6        Amendments to Action Memorandum
       2.7        Removal Response Reports
       2 . 8        Correspondence

3.0    REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI)
      3.1          Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
      3.2          Sampling and Analysis Data/Chain of Custody Forms
      3.3          Work Plan
      3.4          Preliminary RI Field Work Reports
      3.5          Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports
      3.6          Correspondence

4.0    FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS)
      4 .1          ARAR Determinations
      4.2          Feasibility Reports
      4.3          Proposed Plan
      4.4          Supplements and Revisions to the Proposed Plan
      4.5          Correspondence

5.0   RECORD OF DECISION (ROD)
      5 .1          ROD
      5.2          Amendments to ROD
      5.3          Explanations of Significant Differences
      5.4          Correspondence

6.0    STATE AND FEDERAL COORDINATION
      6.1          Cooperative Agreements/SMOAs
      6.2          Federal Facility Agreement (FFA)
      6.3          Coordination - State/Federal
      6.4          General Correspondence

7.0    ENFORCEMENT
      7.1          Enforcement History
      7.2          Endangerment Assessments
      7.3          Administrative Orders
      7.4          Consent Decrees
      7.5          Affidavits
      7.6          Documentation of Technical Discussions/Response Actions
      7.7          Notice Letters and Responses

8.0   HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
      8.1          ATSDR Health Assessments
      8.2          Toxicological Profiles
      8.3          General Correspondence

9.0   NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES
      9.1          Notices Issued
      9.2          Findings of Fact
      9.3          Reports
      9.4          General Correspondence

-------
10.0  PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
      10.1        Comments and Responses
      10.2        Community Relations Plan
      10.3        Public Notice(s)  (Availability of the Admin. Record File, Availability of the Proposed
                  Plan, Public Meetings)
      10.4        Public Meeting Transcripts
      10.5        Documentation of other Public Meetings
      10.6        Fact Sheets, Press Advisories, and News Releases
      10.7        Responsiveness Summary
      10.8        Late Comments
      10.9        Technical Review Committee Charter
      10.10       Correspondence

11.0  TECHNICAL SOURCES, GUIDANCE, AND PROCEDURES DOCUMENTS
      11.1        EPA Headguarters Guidance
      11.2        EPA Regional Guidance
      11.3        State Guidance
      11.4        Air Force Guidance
      11.5        Technical Sources
      11.6        Proposed Procedures/Procedures
      11.7        Correspondence

*Note: Guidance documents listed as bibliographic sources for a document already included in the
Administrative Record are not listed separately in this index.

12.0  CONFIDENTIAL FILE
      12.1        Privileged Documents  (Extractions)

-------
1.1 Background - RCRA and Other Information
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(1.1)#1 001-031
 Scope  of Work  for  the  Remedial  Investigation/Feasibility Study
 USAF
 EPA. NHDES
 April  1991
 Scope  of Work  for  RI/FS
 None
 ARF,IR

 PEA(l.l) #2  i-J.12
 Draft  Supplemental  Environmental  Impact  Statement:  Disposal  and Reuse  of
 Pease  Air  Force Base,  New Hampshire
 USAF
 Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
 May  1995
 Environmental  Impact Statement
None
 ARF,IR
1.2 Notification/Site Inspection Reports

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
1.3 Preliminary Assessment  (PA) Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
PEA(1.3)#1 001-068
Phase  II  Problem Confirmation  and  Quantification Presurvey  Report  (Field
Sampling  for  SI  Work)
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Roy  F. Weston,  Inc.
EPA: NHDES; USAF Occupational  and  Environmental  Health Lab  (OEHL),  Brooks
AFB, TX
June 1984
Technical Report
 None
ARF,IR

 PEA(1.3)#2  001-182
Installation Restoration  Program Records  Search  for  Pease Air  Force Base,
New  Hampshire
CH2M Hill
EPA. NHDES; USAF Engineering  & Service  Center, Tyndall AFB;  SAC,  Offutt AFB,
NE
January  1984
Technical Report
 None
ARF,IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(1.3)#3 001-041
 Preliminary Assessment  Stage  3B  IRP,
 Report)
 Roy  F. Weston,  Inc.
 USAF: EPA: NHDES
 20 July  1990
 Letter Report
 None
 ARF,IR
Pease AFB,  New Hampshire (Updated PA

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
        PEA(1.3)#4 001-1.2
       Final Preliminary Assessment Report,  Portsmouth Refuse  to Energy  Plan
       ICF Kaiser Engineers,  Inc.
       286 Congress Street, 7th Floor
       Boston, Massachusetts  02210
       USAF
       November 1991
       Report
        None
       ARF,IR
1.4 Site Investigation  (SI) Report
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(1.4)#1 001-309
Installation Restoration Program, Phase  II  - Confirmation/Quantification
Stage I, Volume I, Final
Report for Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
HQ SAC/SGPB. Offutt AFB, NE; EPA; NHDES
August 1986
Technical Report:  Field Investigations
None
ARF,IR

PEA(1.4)#2 001-883
Installation Restoration Program Phase II - Confirmation Quantification
Stage 1. Volume II, Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
HQ SAC/SGPB, Offutt AFB, NE: EPA: NHDES
August 1987
Technical Report:  Field Investigations
None
ARF,IR

 PEA(1.4)#3 001-308
Installation Restoration Program Stage 3B Preliminary Assessment/Site
Inspection for Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire  - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; HQ SAC/DE, Offutt AFB, NE: AFSC HSD YAQ, Brooks AFB, TX
February 1991
Technical Report:  Also includes review of PA
None
ARF,IR
1.5 Previous Operable Unit Information

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
1.6 Correspondence

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(1.6)#1 001-002
Comment Regarding  the  Installation Restoration Program.  Phase  I Record
Search Report, Pease Air Force Base
The State  of New Hampshire, Water Supply and  Pollution Control Commission
USAF, HQ SAC, Offutt AFB, NE
16 March 1984
Letter/Comments
None
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(1.6)#2 001-004
Comments Regarding  the  Installation  Restoration  Program Report  (09/10/86)
State of New Hampshire, Division  of  Public Health  Services
NH Division of Public Health  Services
24 November 1986
Comments to SI  (1.4)
None
ARF  (Section 1.6 Binder)

 PEA(1.6)#3 001-005
Comments Regarding  the  Phase  II,  Stage  1  IRP  Report  (08/86  Draft)
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental  Services
USAF
3 February 1987
Comments to SI (1.4)
None
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

 PEA(1.6)#4 001-007
Air force Responses  to  Comments From the  New  Hampshire  Department  of
Environmental Services  on  the Phase  II, Stage 1  IRP  Draft Report
USAF
NHDES
8 May 1987
Responses to Comments to SI  (1.4)
None
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

 PEA(1.6)#5 001-004
Letter Concerning Site  Walkovers  made with Members of Sherburne Civic  Group
State of New Hampshire, Division  of  Public Health  Services
USAF
18 July 1990
Letter
None
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

 PEA(1.6)#6 001-002
Zone 3 Water Hardness at Pease, AFB, NH
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston,  Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
25 May 1994
Letter with Attachment
Zone 3
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

PEA(1.6)#7 001-001
Bulk Fuel Storage Area  (BFSA)  Site Investigation Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA OL-A
157  ARG/DE, Attn:  Maj. Robertson
2 June 1994
Memorandum
BFSA
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

Bulk Fuel Storage Area  (BFSA)  Site Investigation Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
157 ARG/DE, Attn: Maj.  Robertson
7 June 1994
Memorandum
BFSA
ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:       PEA(1.6)#9 001-001
LONG TITLE:           Locations of Surface Waters of New Hampshire in the Vicinity of the Former
                      Pease Air Force Base
AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
RECIPIENT:            Richard Pease, NHDES
DATE:                 3 March 1994
TYPE:                 Letter
SECOND REFERENCE:     Pickering Brook
LOCATION:             ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

DOCUMENT NUMBER:       PEA(1.6)#10 001-001
LONG TITLE:           Pease Air Force Base Environmental Baseline Study  (BBS)
AUTHOR:               Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
RECIPIENT:            Charles Brown, AFCEE/ECA
DATE:                 28 June 1995
TYPE:                 Memorandum
SECOND REFERENCE:     Environmental Baseline Survey
LOCATION:             ARF(Section 1.6 Binder)

2.1 Sampling Analysis Plans

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.2 Sampling and Analysis Data/Chain of Custody

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.3 EE/CA Approval Memorandum(Non-Time Critical Removals)

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.4 EE/CA  (Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis)

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.5 Action Memorandum

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.6 Amendments to Action Memorandum

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.7 Removal Response Reports

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

2.8 Correspondence

DOCUMENT NUMBER:       PEA(2.8)#1 001-041
LONG TITLE:           New Hampshire wetlands permit for National Priorities List  (NPL) Related
                      Work Site 32/36
AUTHOR:               USAF
RECIPIENT:            State of New Hampshire
DATE:                 22 August 1990
TYPE:                 Permit
SECOND REFERENCE:     Site 32.36
LOCATION:             ARF(Section 2.8 Binder)

-------
3.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan  (SAP)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.1)#1 001-210
Quality Assurance Project Plan, Integrated Installation Restoration Program, Stage
2, to Support the Preliminary Remedial Investigation Field Work, Labeled Stage 2
Field Work
Roy E. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NIDES; HQ SAC/DEPV, Ouffutt AFB, NE
November 1987
Quality Assurance Project Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                                Integrated Installation Restoration Program, Stage
                                       4 Sampling and Analysis Plan - Draft
 PEA(3.1)#2  001-212
Quality Assurance Project Plan,
3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
August 1989
Quality Assurance Project Plan
None
ARF
 PEA(3.1)#3 001-286
Installation Restoration Program Stage
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
January 1991
Sampling and Analysis Plan
None
ARF
 PEA(3.1)#4  001-003
Locations of Background Sampling Locations
Arthur L. Ditto, RPM
U.S. Air Force/Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, RPM, EPA:
Richard Pease, RPM, NHDES
15 June 1992
Letter and Map
Stage 3C Background Data Base
ARF(Section 3.1 Binder)

 PEA(3.1)#5  001-R1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3,
Pease AFB, NH -Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Addendum
None
ARF

 PEA(3.1)#6  001-001
Analysis Using SW846 Mehod 8330 for Explosives
Edward S. Barnes, P.E., C.I.H.
Roy F. Weston, INc.
Capt. Carl Wocerhle
U.S. Air Force/Base Closure Division
Air Force Base Center for Environmental Excellence
23 October 1992
Letter
Samples for SW8330 Analysis
ARF(Section 3.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.1)#7 001-005
Ethylene Dibronide  (EDB) Analysis Using Modified Method E504.1
Edward S. Barnes, P.E., C.I.H.
Roy F. Weston, INc.
Capt. Carl Wocerhle
U.S. Air Force/Base Closure Division
Air Force Base Center for Environmental Excellence
19 November 1992
Letter with 4 Page Attachment
Analytical Method Recommended for EDB Analysis
ARF(Section 3.1 Binder)

 PEA(3.1)#8 2.24-R.l
Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan, Addendum #3. QAPP Portion
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
2 December 1992
Addendum
None
ARF

 PEA(3.1)#9 001-002
Submittal of Construction Quality Plan  (CQP) and Sampling and Analysis Plan  (SAP)
for Ditch Maintenance
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
21 June 1994
Letter
Newfield's Ditch, Grafton Ditch, Flagstone Brook, Mclntyre Brook, Paul's Brook
ARF(Section 3.1 Binder)

 PEA(3.1)#10 001-004
Earthworm Sampling Protocol at Pease AFB, NH
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, P.E. AFBCA
20 September 1995
Letter & Proposal
None
ARF(Section 3.1 Binder)
3.2 Sampling and Analysis Data/Chain of Custody Forms
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.1)#1 001-027
Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020 - Draft Data Sheets
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#2 001-018
Volatile Aromatics/Halocarbons by Modified 8010/8020
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.2)#3 001-009
CLP Volatile organic Analysis, Case No. 15175, SDG No. AX086, 8 Water Analytical
Results
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Unknown
Data
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#4 001-013
Preliminary Survey of Metal Concentrations in New Hampshire Soils - Final Report
New Hampshire Division of Public Health Services, Bureau of Health Risk Assessment
USAF
May 1991
Data
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#5 001-D1
Background Soluble Metals Concentrations for Groundwater at Pease AFB
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
20 November 1991
Letter Report
PEA(3.6)
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.2)#6 001-E.l
Tolerance Limits for Background Soils at Pease ARE, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
17 April 1992
Letter Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.2)#7 001-002
Results of Background Surface Water/Sediment Location Walkover
Arthur L. Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter. EPA
19 August 1992
Letter
Knights Brook
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#8 001-052
Maximum Detected Concentrations for Unfiltered Groundwater at Pease AFB, NH
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, USAF
25 August 1992
Letter with Attachments(Tables and Graphs)
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#9 001-009
Newington Water Quality Sampling on July 18, 1992 and Analysis Performed on August
28, 1992
 (NHDES Sample #210239-210241)
Scott Doane, Hydrogeologist
NHDES
Wayne Wood
Newington, NH 03803
21 September 1992
Letter and Chain of Custody and Tables
None
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

3.3 Work Plan
 PEA(3.2)#10 001-009
Tissue Sample Letter Report for Great Bay, Bass Pond and Mclntyre Brook
Lee R. dePersia, Roy F. Weston Inc.
Through U.S. Air Force
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 October 1992
Routing Letters and Letter Report with Map and Table
Great Bay, Bass Pond, Mclntyre Brook
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)

 PEA(3.2)#11 001-007
Zone 1 Groundwater Model Calibration
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
17 May 1993
Letter Report
Zone 1
ARF(Section 3.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.3)#1 001-144
Work Plan for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
August 1989
Work Plan
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.3)#2  001-B.4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Action Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
May 1991
Operations Plan
None
ARF
 PEA(3.3)#3 001-258
Installation Restoration Program,
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
January 1991
Work Plan
None
ARF
Stage 4 Work Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.3)#4  001-213
Work Plan for the Integrated Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2.1 Labeled
Stage 2
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES
September 1987
Work Plan
None
ARF, IR

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA(3.3)#5  001-G5
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage
 Draft
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 September 1991
 Addendum
 None
 ARF,IR
                                        4 Work Plan Addendum 1, Pease AFB, NH -
  PEA(3.3)#6 001-G5
 Installation Restoration
 Pease AFB,NH - Draft
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 March 1992
 Addendum
 None
 ARF,IR
                          Program, Stage 4 Work Plan addendum Number 2 for
                                            #
  PEA(3.3)#7 001-B4
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Operation Plan for Pease AFB,
 NH - Draft
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 May 1991
 Plan
 None
 ARF,IR
                                         4 Work Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB, NH
 PEA(3.3)#8  001-3.5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
June 1992
Addendum
None
ARF,IR
  PEA(3.3)#9 iii-R2
 Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum - Section 9 Paint Can Disposal Area Test
 Pit and Drum Handling Procedures
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 22 June 1992
 Addendum
 None
 ARF,IR

PEA(3.3)#10 001-004
Groundwater Modeling Process Outline
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, USAF
2 October 1992
Letter
Groundwater Modeling
ARF(Section 3.3 Binder)

  PEA(3.3)#11 001-C.31
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 5 Health and Safety Plan, Pease
 AFB, NH - Draft
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 October 1992
 Health and Safety Plan
 Groundwater Modeling
 ARF,IR

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.3)#12  001-F
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Interim Monitoring Plan
USAF
Pease AFB
January 1994
Monitoring Plan
Groundwater Monitoring
ARF(Zone 7 Shelf)

 PEA(3.3)#13  001-4.1
Work Plan to Evaluate the Sediments of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook,
Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
27 October 1993
Work Plan
Mclntyre Brook: Flagstone Brook
ARF(Section 3.3 Binder)
3.4 Preliminary RI Field Work Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#1 001-173
Interim Technical Report No.l for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume I, for Pease Air Force Base
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA:NHDES:USAF
February 1988
Technical Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#2  001-147
Interim Technical Report No. 1 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA:NHDES;USAF
January 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#3 001-214
Interim Technical Report No.
Stage 2, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES;USAF
August 1988
Technical Report
None
ARF
2 for the Installation Restoration Program,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#4  001-696
Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices  (Sample Tracking Information, Analytical Results)
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES;USAF
August 1988
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA(3.4)#5  001-838
  Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program,
  Stage 2, Volume III - Appendices(Analytical Results)
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  August 1988
  Technical Report - Appendices
  None
  ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA(3.4)#6 001-722
  Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program,
  Stage 2, Volume IV - Appendices(Analytical Results)
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  August 1988
  Technical Report - Appendices(Analytical Results
  None
  ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA(3.4)#7  001-289
  Interim Technical Report No. 2 for the Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2,
Volume V - Appendices(Field Geological, Geological, and Hydrogeological Data)
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  August 1988
  Technical Report - Appendices
  None
  ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA(3.4)#8  001-106
  Interim Technical Report No. 3 for the Installation Restoration Program,
  Stage 2, Volume I -
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  February 1989
  Technical Report
  None
  ARF

   PEA(3.4)#9  001-658
  Interim Technical Report No. 3 for the Installation Restoration Program,
  Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  February 1989
  Technical Report - Appendices
  None
  ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA(3.4)#10  001-198
  Interim Technical Report No.
  Stage 2, Volume I - Draft
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  EPA;NHDES;USAF
  April 1989
  Technical Report
  None
  ARF
4 for the Installation Restoration Program,

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#11 001-770
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume II - Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#12  001-568
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume III - Appendices-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#13 001-770
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume IV -  Appendices-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#14  001-1,150
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume V -  Appendices-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF

 PEA(3.4)#15  001-729
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume VI - Appendices-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#16 001-803
Interim Technical Report No. 4 for the Installation Restoration Program,
Stage 2, Volume VII- Appendices-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
April 1989
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#17 001-251
Installation Restoration Program, State 2, Draft Final Report, Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#18  001-452
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Volume II
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#19 001-621
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices,
Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#20 001-420
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices,
Volume II
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#21 001-658
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices,
Volume III
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#22  001-688
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices,
 Volume IV
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#23 001-261
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Draft Final Report, Appendices,
Volume V
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#24  001-340
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 2, Summary Analytical Tables
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
July 1990
Technical Report - Appendices
None
ARF

 PEA(3.4)#25  001-338
Installation Restoration Program Stage 3, Landfill 5 Site Characterization
Summary - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA;NHDES;USAF
November 1990
Technical Report
Landfill 5
ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

 PEA (3.4)  #26 001-041
Pease AFB Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 August 1992
Report
None
ARF(Section 3.4 Binder)

 PEA(3.4)#27  001-D
Background Values for Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Sediment at
Pease Air Force Base
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
26 February 1993
Letter
None
ARF

 PEA(3.4)#28  001-Map 6
Off Base Well Inventory Letter Report for Pease AFB
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
17 September 1992
Letter Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#29 001-Figure 11
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base,
Regional Groundwater Model
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF

 PEA(3.4)#30 001-C.2
Pease Air Force Base Monitor Well Inventory and Inspection Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
04 October 1994
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 PEA(3.4)#31 001-005

-------
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
Mclntyre Brook Sediment Excavation Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July  1995
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA(3.4)#32 001-055
Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment for  Pauls Brook  at  Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
AFBCA
December 1995
Risk Assessment Report
Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment for  Pauls Brook  (Forwarding  Letter-
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.4)#33 001-095
Pease AFB Zone 3 Groundwater Modeling Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
AFBCA
December 1995
Report
Zone 3 Groundwater Modeling Report  (Forwarding Letter  -  3.6)
ARF
3.5 Remedial Investigation  (RI) Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#1 001-G.4
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill  5 Remedial  Investigation,
Pease AFB, NH  Technical Report  - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Report
Landfill 5
ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#2 001-6.4.5
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill  5 Remedial  Investigation,
Pease AFB, NH Figures-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Figures
Landfill 5
ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#3 001-F.154
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill  5 Remedial  Investigation,
Pease AFB, NH Appendices A-F - DRAFT  FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Appendices
Landfill 5
ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA(3.5)#4  001-M.30
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation,
 Pease AFB, NH Appendices G.H.Land M-DRAFT FINAL
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 April 1992
 Appendices
 Landfill 5
 ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA(3.5)#5 001-K
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Landfill 5 Remedial Investigation, Pease
AFB, NH  Appendices  1-K-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1992
Appendices
Landfill 5
ARF(Landfill 5 Shelf)

  PEA(3.5)#6  001-5.2.1
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site Characterization Summary Zone 3,
 Pease AFB, NH Technical Report
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 May 1992
 Report
 Zone 3
 ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

  PEA(3.5)#7  001-C
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, Site Characterization Summary
 Zone 3, Pease AFB,  NH Appendices
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 May 1992
 Appendices
 Zone 3
 ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)
                                         4 Site Characterization Summary,
 PEA(3.5)#8  001-D
Installation Restoration Program, Stage
IRP Zone 4,  Pease AFB, NH Appendices
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)
  PEA(3.5)#9 001-R29
 Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization
 Summary, IRP Zone 4, Pease AFB,
 NH Technical Report
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 May 1992
 Appendices
 Zone 4
 ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#10 001-A.3
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Jet Engine Test Cell - IRP Site 34,
Source Area Remedial Investigation Pease AFB, NH Technical Report - DRAFT FINAL.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Report
Site 34
ARF(Site 34 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#11 001-B12
Sampling Locations and Results Drainage Area Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1992
Report
None
ARF

 PEA(3.5)#12 001-B43
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4, No Further Action Decision
Document for IRP Site 3, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1992
Decision Document
Site 3
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#13 001-3.1.1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization
Summary, IRP Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH Technical Report - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#14 001-C
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization
Summary, IRP Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH Appendices A-C - Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Appendices
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#15 001-ACR 1
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization Summary,
IRP Zone 2, Pease AFB, NH Text
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#16 A-C
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization Summary,
IRP Zone 2, Pease AFB, NH, Appendices A-C
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#17 D1-D2
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4 Site Characterization Summary,
IRP Zone 2, Pease AFB, NH Appendix D-Volume 1 & 2
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Appendices
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)
 PEA(3.5)#18  E-F
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 4
IRP Zone 2, Pease AFB, NH Appendices E-F
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1992
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)
 PEA(3.5)#19 001-126
Haven Well Pumping Test Letter Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEF/ESB, USAF
8 January 1993
Transmittal Letter., Letter Report, Maps, Appendices
None
ARF
Site Characterization Summary,
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#20 OOl-Acr.5
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report Text-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Report
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#21 001-6.4.3
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report-Figures-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Report
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#22  001-1
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigational Report, Appendices B,C,D,E,F,G,H and
I-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#23  001-0
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendices J,L and 0-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#24  001-K-l
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix K. Part 1 of 2-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#25  001-K-2
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix K Part 2 of 2-Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#26  001-0
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix M, & N
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1993
Appendices
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#27  001-J.l
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix J 1 of 4
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1993
Appendix
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#28  001-J.2
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix J 2 of 4
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1993
Appendix
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#29  001-J.3
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix J 3 of 4
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1993
Appendix
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#30  001-J.4
United States Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease Air Force
Base, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation Report, Appendix J 4 of 4
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1993
Appendix
Zone 4
ARF(Zone 4 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#31  001-ACR 4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Text-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Report
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#32  001-6.4-4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Figures-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Figures
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#33  001-F
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices A, B,C,D,E and F-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Appendices
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#34  001-04/19/93
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices B DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (10/93 Draft Final used to supplement)
Appendix
Zone 1
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#35  001-L
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices G,H,I, and L-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Appendices
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#36  001-H-4.95
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices H Part 1 of 2-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (10/93 Draft Final used to supplement)
Appendix
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#37  001-H
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices H Part 2 of 2-Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (10/93 DRAFT FINAL used to supplement)
Appendix
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#38  001-2853
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (10/93 DRAFT FINAL used to supplement)
Appendices
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#39  001-J
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix J-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Appendix
Zone 1
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#40 001-K.6-6
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix K-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Appendix
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#41 001-L
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix L DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993  (10/93 DRAFT FINAL used to supplement)
Appendices
Zone 1
ARF(Zone 1 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#42 OOl-Arc.4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Text-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#43 001-6.4-3
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Figures-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Figures
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#44 001-G
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices A, C,D,E,F and G-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendices
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#45 001-500
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix B Part 1 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#46 001-500
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix B Part 2 of 2. DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendices
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#47 001-475
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix H-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#48 001-1.1
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I, Part 1 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendices
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#49 001-1.2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I Part 2 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendices
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#50 001-1.3
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I Part 3 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#51 001-J.l
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix J Part 1 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#52  001-J.2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix J Part 2 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#53A 001-K.74
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix K-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#54B 001-300
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices L, M, and N-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#55C 001-1.1
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices I, Part 1 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#56D 001-1.2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 2 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I. Part 2 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Appendix
Zone 2
ARF(Zone 2 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#57  001-ACR,4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Text-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#58  001-6.390
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Section 6 Tables-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Tables
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#59  001-F.94
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Figures-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Figures
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#60  001-D.26
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices A, C, and D-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#61  001-B
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices B Part 1 of 2 DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#62  001-B
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix B Part 2 of 2 DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#63 001-1000
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices B,E,F,G,L and M-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendices
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#64  001-H.4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix H Part 1 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FINAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#65  001-H
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix H Part 2 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FINAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#66  001-H
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix H Part 3 of 3-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993 (same as DRAFT FINAL September 1993)
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#67  001-2388
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I Part 1 of-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#68  2424-5307
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix I Part 2 of 2-DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#69  001-J.l
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendices I and J Part 1 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#70 001-J.2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix J Part 2 of 2-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#71 001-K.7
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Remedial
Investigation Report Appendix K-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF(Zone 3 Shelf)

 PEA(3.5)#72 001-K.5-2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB, Mclntyre Brook/Lower
Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF,PEA(4.2)#24 001-K.5-2 on Zone 3 Shelf(Filed as Feasibility Study Report)

 PEA(3.5)#73 001-009
Letter Report to Establish Remedial Goals for Sediments in Flagstone Brook
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
19 April 1994
Letter Report(RI)
Flagstone Brook
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#74  001-039
Cumulative Risk Evaluation for Zone
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
March 1994
Risk Evaluation Report
Zone l,Zone 2,Zone 3,Zone 4,Zone 5
ARF

 PEA(3.5)#75  001-008
Zone 3 Water Hardness
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
03 August 1994
Letter with enclosures
Zone 3
ARF(Section 3.5 Binder)
 PEA(3.5)#76 001-007
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
05 August 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone l:Zone 2:Zone 4
ARF(Section 3.5 Binder)
1 through Zone 5 at Pease AFB,N.H.
   2 for Pease Air Force Base,  NH

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#77 001-002
Sediment Toxicity Test Report for Flagstone and Mclntyre Brooks, Pease Air
Force Base, NH
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
30 September 1994
Fax
PEA  (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.5 Binder)

 PEA(3.5)#78 001-E.34
Summary of Revision to Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan, Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
23 November 1994
Interim Monitoring Plan
PEA(lO.l)#161 001-006
ARF

 PEA(3.5)#79 001-040
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 4 for Pease Air Force Base,NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
16 December 1994
Interim Monitoring Report
Zone 1,-Zone 2;Zone 4;Zone 5;Zone 7;PEA(10.1) #161 001-006
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#80 i-Appendix E
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report for Pease Air Force Base,NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1994
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#81 1.1-Figure 2.7.6
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base, Basewide
Interim Monitoring Report No. 1 for October Through December 1993 - Volume I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#82  Appendix A-Appendix C
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base, Basewide
Interim Monitoring Report No. 1 for October Through December 1993-Volume II
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1994
Report
None
ARF

 PEA(3.5)#83  001-043
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base,
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 2 for January through March 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July 1994
Report
None
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.5)#84  001-049
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease Air Force Base,
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 3
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1994
Report
None
ARF
3.6 RI Correspondence

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:

SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#1 001-001
Comments Regarding the Work Plan for the IRP Stage 2
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
27 July 1987
Comments Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI Field Work, Report)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#2 001-006
Letter Regarding IRP, Stage 2
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
11 November 1987
Letter Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#3 001-001
Letter Stating Conformance of the Stage 2, Quality Assurance Project Plan With Air
Force IRP Practices
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
12 November 1987
Letter Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#4 001-003
Review Comments on the Phase II, Stage 2 IRP, Draft Final Report
State of New Hampshire, Department of Environmental Services
USAF
28 February 1990
Review Comments on Phase II, Stage 2, IRP Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI
Field Work Reports)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#5 001-011
Review Comments for the Pease AFB, Phase II, Stage 2 IRP Draft Final Report
EPA
USAF
7 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4  (Preliminary FI Field Work Reports)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#6 001-010
Review Comments Regarding the IRP, Stage 2 Draft Final Report  (December 1989)
U.S.  Department of Commence, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
EPA;  USAF
7 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
PE(lO.l)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#7 001-020
Review Comments to the IRP Stage 2 RI/FS Draft Report
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc; Pease AFB
15 March 1990
Review Comments Serving 3.4  (Preliminary RI Field Work Reports)
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#8 001-004
Sampling Data for Off-Site Sampling at Pease AFB
State of New Hampshire, Water Supply and Pollution Control Division
Air Force
5 July 1990
Sampling Data
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#9 001-003
Off-Base Sampling at Pease AFB
NHDES
USAF
25 October 1990
Sampling Results
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#10  001-065
Sampling Results from Pease AFB, Newington, Portsmouth
NHDES
USAF
17 January 1991
Sampling Data
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#11  001-002
Installation Restoration Program(IRP)at Pease AFB,NH
Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
8 March 1989
Memorandum - Pertaining to RI
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#12  001-002
Work Plan for the IRP Stage 3 and ITR #4
Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
3 April 1989
Memorandum - Pertaining to RI
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#13  001-007
Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Work Plan for Pease Air Force Base, NH
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 June 1989
Review Comments - Pertaining to RI
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#14  001-001
Review Comments Regarding the Work Plan and QAPP-Stage 3
NHDES
USAF
16 June 1989
Review Comments-Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#15  001-008
Stage 3 Work Plan-Response to Comments
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
29 June 1989
Response to Comments-Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#16  001-008
Consolidated Comments to the IRP Stage 3 Quality Assurance Project
Plan(QAPP)  for Pease Air Force Base, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
29 June 1989
Review Comments-Pertaining to RI
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#17  001-004
Letter Regarding Recent and Scheduled Future Activity in the Bulk Fuel Storage Area
USAF
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
10 May 1990
Letter
BFSA
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#18  001-007
Review Comments on the Stage 3 Work Plan for the IRP
EPA
USAF
7 June 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#19  001-002
Letter Concerning Proposed Drilling Locations, Stage 3B
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
12 June 1990
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#20  001-002
Letter Regarding Well Installation Modification
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
5 July 1990
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#21 001-002
Information Letter 3 - Documenting discussion on 25 October 1990
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
29 October 1990
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#22 001-007
Stage 3, Landfill 5 Site Characterization Summary Informal Technical
Information Report-Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
30 January 1991
Review Comments
PEA (3.4)#32 001-0338;PEA(10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#33 001-008
Response to Comments - Draft Final Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling And Analysis Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Letter/Response to Comments
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#34 001-017
EPA Review Comments on the Stage 3, Landfill 5 Site Characterization
Summary Informal Technical Information Report
EPA
USAF
14 February 1991
Review Comments
PEA(3.4)#32 001-338;PEA(10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#35 001-004
Issues Needing Resolution Prior to the Upcoming Field Efforts
EPA
USAF
10 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#36 001-030
Response to Comments. Landfill 5 Site Characterization Summary - Informal
Technical Information Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 June 1991
Response to Comments
PEA(3.4)#32 001-338;PEA(10.1); Landfill 5
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#37 001-030
 (Revised) Response to Comments - Landfill 5 - Site Characterization
Summary, Informal Technical Information Report
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
17 July 1991
Letter
PEA(3.4)#32 001-338;PEA(10.1); Landfill 5
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#38  001-038
Response to Comments - Stage 4 Work Plan and SAP
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
28 September 1990
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#39  001-011
Review comments on the Installation Restoration Plan(IRP) Stage 4 Work
Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
NHDES
USAF
16 October 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#40  001-017
The Town of Newington Review Comments on the IRP Stage 4 Work Plan
The Town of Newington
USAF
29 October 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)
                                            4 Work Plan and Sampling and
 PEA(3.6)#41 001-076
EPA Technical Review of the Draft IRP Stage
Analysis Plan for Pease Air Force Base
EPA
USAF
2 November 1990
Review Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)
 PEA(3.6)#42  001-002
Response to Air Force Questions on State Comments to the Stage 4 Work Plan
NHDES
USAF
3 December 1990
Response to guestions on comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#43  001-007
Response to EPA Comments on the Pease AFB Stage 4 Work Plan Sampling and
Analysis Plan
Air Force
EPA
10 December 1990
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#44  001-008
Air Force Response to NHDES Comments - Draft Final Stage 4 Work Plan and
Sampling and Analysis Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#45  001-008
EPA Initial Approval of the IRP Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan
EPA
USAF
13 March 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#46  001-058
Air Force Response to EPA Comments on the Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling
and Analysis Plan
USAF
EPA
1991
Response to Comments
PEA (10.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#47  001-003
Off-Base Sampling at Pease Air Force Base
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
25 October 1990
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#48  001-001
EPA Concerns
USAF
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
8 April 1991
Internal Record of Phone Conversation with EPA and NHDES
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#49  001-004
Issues Needing Resolution Prior to Upcoming Field Efforts
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
10 April 1991
Letter
PEA(3.3)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#50  001-002
Review of Risk, Assessment Data and Sampling Procedures
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
16 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#51  001-067
Concerns about Analytical Methods
USAF
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
23 April 1991
Fax with Attachments
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#52  001-001
Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Locations
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 April 1991
Letter(Transmittal)
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#53  001-008
Field Oversight Coordination
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
29 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#54  001-004
Preliminary Sampling Schedule for Stage 3C IRP Sites through November 1991
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
02 May 1991
Fax
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#55  001-003
Review of April 25, 1991 Revised Aanlytical Methods
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
08 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

   PEA(3.6)#56 001-002
Review of April 25, 1991 Revised Analytical Methods
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
08 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#57  001-005
Field Performance Review of Weston Activities, Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
Mitre Corporation
Dennis Landguest, Human Systems Division
IRP Program Office
HSD YAQ
Brooks AFB. TX 78235-5000
14 May 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#58  001-002
Revised Analytical Methods for Pease AFB
Logan VanLeigh, Capt. USAF. BSC
Johanna Hunter, EPA
31 May 1991
Letter
PEA(3.1)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#59 001-005
Procedure for Establishing Background Metal Concentrations for Groundwater and Soil
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
03 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#60 001-012
Information to Assist Interpretation of Data Submitted by EPA to the Air Force
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
06 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#61 001-004
Resolution Letter for Procedures for 8260 for VOC Analysis of Water
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
Carl Gysler, Earth Technology, San Bernardino, CA
Johanna Hunter, EPA
06 June 1991
Fax
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#62 001-001
Background Determination Protocols
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
07 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#63 001-001
Background Determination Protocols
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
07 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#64 001-003
Revised Analytical Methods for Pease AFB GC/MS method 8260 for VOA
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
11 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#65 001-001
Laboratory Services
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
13 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA(3.6)#66 001-002
Roy F. Weston, INC.,  Proposed Methods for Determining Background
Concentrations at Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire
George Rice, Mitre Corporation
Dennis Lundguist, Human Systems Division
IRP Program Office
HSD/YAQ
Brooks AFB, TX 78235-5000
02 July 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA(3.6)#67 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Protocols for Baseline Risk Assessments
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
18 July 1991
Transmittal Letter
Baseline Risk Assessments
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA  (3.6)  #68 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Protocols for Baseline Risk Assessments
Author Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter EPA
18 July 1991
Transmittal Letter
Baseline Risk Assessments
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)  #69 001-001
Submittal of Secondary Document
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, USEPA
18 July, 1991
Letter
Site 32:36
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #70 001-006
Review of the Proposed Procedure for Background Determination Protocols
for Pease Air Force Base, Portsmouth, NH
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
02 August 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #71 001-001
Split Sampling Results
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johann Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 September 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)  #72  001-002
Field Oversight-September 1991
Richard Pease,  NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
28 October 1991
Letter
PEA  (3.4)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #73  001-001
Transmittal Letter for Data Collected on Surface Water and Sediment
Background Concentration
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Ed Barnes Roy F. Weston
2 December 1991
Transmittal Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #74  001-002
Regional Literature Search to Assist Development of the Sediment and
Surface Water Background Determination for Pease AFB, Portsmouth, NH
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
2 December 1991
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #75  001-001
Fugitive Dust Pathway in the Baseline Risk Assessment
Arthur Ditto, USAFA
Johanna Hunter, EPA
3 January 1992
Letter
PEA  (3.5)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #76  001-001
Evaluation of the Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessment
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
11 February 1992
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #77  001-001
Evaluation of the Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessment
USAF
Richard Pease,  NHDES
11 February 1992
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #78  001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Baseline Risk Assessment Protocols
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease,  NHDES
25 February 1992
Transmittal Letter
Baseline Risk Assessment
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (3.6)  #79 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Revised Baseline Risk Assessment Protocols
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
25 February 1992
Transmittal Letter
Revised Baseline Risk Assessment
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #80 001-003
Request for EPA Split Sampling Results
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
9 March 1992
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #81 001-D1
Letter Report of Results of Statistical Comparison of Stage 3C Samples to
the 66 Other Background Samples
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
9 March 1992
Letter Report
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #82 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2 on
the Draft Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 March 1992
Transmittal Letter
PEA (3.1);PEA (3.3)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #83 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Stage 4 Addendum Number 2 Work Plan
and Sampling and Analysis Plan
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 March 1992
Transmittal Letter
PEA(3.1);PEA(3.3)
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #84 001-001
Data You May Be Able to Provide
Thomas R. Marks, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

 PEA (3.6)  #85 001-022
Evaluation of Air Pathway in Baseline Risk Assessments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
13 April 1992
Letter with Attachments
None
ARF(Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #86 001-003
Pease Air Force Base Zone 4 Draft Site Characterization Summary
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
08 May 1992
Letter
Zone 4
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #87 001-002
Oversight Role of Regulatory Agencies at Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #88 001-003
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 May 1992
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
PEA  (3.6) #89 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Documents, Stage
Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 June 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #90 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Documents, Stage
Stage 4 Health and Safety Plan Addendum
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
24 June 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and
4 Work Plan Addendum 3 and
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #91 001-002
Additional Field Oversight
USAF
Michael Daly, EPA
8 July 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #92 001-021
Pease Air Force Base Groundwater Modeling Letter Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 July 1992
Letter with Report
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #93 001-002
Results of Background Surface Water Sediment Location Walkover
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
27 August 1992
Letter
PEA  (6.4)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #94 001-005
Risk Assessment Issues for Pease AFB
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, USAF
28 August 1992
Letter Report
PEA  (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #95 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Groundwater Background Letter Report
Mark McKenzie for Author Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
Johanna Hunter, EPA
1 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #96 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 3
Further Action Decision Document (NFADD)
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
9 September 1992
Letter
Site 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
No
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #97 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Site 3 No
Further Action Decision Document (NFADD)
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 September 1992
Letter
Site 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #98 001-003
Summary of Risk Issues Meeting of August 19, 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
16 September 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #99 001-002
Field Oversight - Mid-August-Mid-September
Richard Pease NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease, AFB
7 October 1991
Letter
PEA  (3.4)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #100 001-001
Pease AFB Zone 1 Site Characterization Summary
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt. Carl Woerhle, AFCEE
21 October 1992
Transmittal Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #101 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Pease AFB Zone 2 Site Characterization Study
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt. Carl Woerhle, AFCEE
22 October 1992
Letter
Zone 2
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #102 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Zone 2 Site Characterization Summary Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Richard Pease, NHDES
22 October 1992
Letter
Zone 2
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #103 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Zone 2 Site Characterization Summary Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Johanna Hall, TRC Member, Lowell, MA
22 October 1992
Letter
Zone 2
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #104 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Zone 2 Site Characterization Summary Report
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Johanna Hunter, EPA
22 October 1992
Letter
Zone 2
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #105 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Documents, Zones 1, 2, and 5 Site Characterization
Summaries
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 October 1992
Letter
Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 5
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:

LOCATION:
                                                  and 5 Site Characterization
PEA  (3.6) #106 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 1, 2,
Summaries
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
26 October 1992
Letter
Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 5
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
PEA  (3.6) #107 001-001
Submittal of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
26 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #108 001-001
Submittal of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #109 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Stage 5 Health and Safety Plan
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 November 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #110 001-004
No Further Action Decision for Site 3
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
1 December 1992
Letter
Site 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
PEA  (3.6) #111 001-001
Application of the Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
1 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
PEA  (3.6) #112 001-001
Explanation of Off-Base Well Inventory Report
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
4 December 1992
Letter
Off-Base Well Inventory Letter Report of 17 September 1992
PEA  (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
                                                (RME) in Risk Assessments

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #113 001-001
Transmittal Letter for Submittal of Quality Assurance Project Plan  (QAPP)
Portion of the Stage 4
Sampling and Analysis Plan  (SAP) Number 3
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
11 December 1992
Letter
PEA  (3.1)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #114 001-002
Reguest for Deadline Extension
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
23 December 1992
Letter
PEA  (6.3)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #115 001-001
Transmittal of EPA Maximum Risk Calculation Addenda to Site 5.8.32  36 and
34 Draft Final RI
Reports
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
29 December 1992
Letter
Sites 5, 8, 32/36 and 34; PEA  (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #116 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Zone 4 Remedial Investigation  Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
9 March 1992
Letter
PEA  (3.5); Zone 4
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #117 001-002
Reguest for Deadline Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 March 1993
Letter
PEA  (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #118 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Landfill 5 Record of Decision
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
Landfill 5; PEA (5.1)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #119 001-001
Submittal of Draft Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
Zone 3, Zone 4, Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #120 001-001
Submittal of Draft Documents
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 April 1993
Letter
Zone 3, Zone 4, Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #121 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Landfill 5 Record of Decision
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
21 April 1993
Letter
Landfill 5; PEA (5.1)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #122 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
28 April 1993
Letter
Zone 1, PEA (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #123 001-001
Submittal of Draft Primary Document, Zone 1 Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
28 April 1993
Letter
Zone 1: PEA (3.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #124 001-002
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Draft Final, Outstanding Risk Assessment
Concern
NHDES
USAF
5 November 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #125 001-002
Review of the Draft Final Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Pease AFB
EPA
USAF
8 November 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #170 001-008
Locations of Surface Waters of the State of New Hampshire in the Vicinity
of Former Pease AFB
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
16 November 1993
Letter with Attachment
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #126 001-002
Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report
NHDES
USAF
24 November 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #127 001-001
Draft Final Zone 3, 4, and 5 Remedial Investigation Reports, Pease AFB, NH
EPA
USAF
30 November 1993
Memorandum
Zone 3; Zone 4; Zone 5
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #128 001-002
Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report
NHDES
USAF
27 November 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #129 001-003
Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report
NHDES
USAF
15 December 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #130 001-003
Potential Issues of Dispute, Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 December 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #131 001-003
Potential Issues of Dispute, Mclntyre Brook Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study Report, Draft Final, November 1993  (Draft
Final RI FS)
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
20 December 1993
Letter
Section 4.2; Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #132 001-001
Zone 3 Remedial investigation  (RI) Report, Addendum 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 April 1994
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #133 001-001
Zone 3 Remedial Investigation Report, Addendum 2
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 May 1994
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #134 001-002
Interim Monitoring Plan, DES Review Comments
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 April 1994
Letter, with Response to Comments
Section 10.1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #135 001-063
Pease AFB Second Quarter Report for 1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
12 July 1994
Letter Report
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #136 001-007
Sediment Toxicity Letter Report for Pease AFB, Nil
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 July 1994
Letter Report
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #137 001-001
Surface Water Sampling in Railway Ditch
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 July 1994
Letter
Railway Ditch
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #138 001-D.2
1994 Third Quarter Report
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
08 November 1994
Report
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #139 001-002
Additional Air Force Response to NHDES Zone 3 Remedial Investigation
Addenda #1 and #2 Comments
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
24 February 1995
Letter
Zone 3; PEA (10.1)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #140 001-001
Sampling Results Newington Locations
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
Margaret Lamson, Town of Newington, NH
24 November 1993
Letter
PEA  (10.10)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #141 001-001
Regional Groundwater Modeling Letter Report for Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
02 May 1994
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #142 001-001
Surface Water Sampling in Railway Ditch
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
20 July 1994
Fax
Railway Ditch
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #143 001-Att. 5
Zone 3 Water Hardness at Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
25 May 1994
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #144 001-001
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 6
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
Michael Daly,  EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 July 1995
Letter
Zones 1, 2,  3, 4, 5 and Zone 7
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA  (3.6) #145 001-001
Bulk Fuel Storage Area Construction Work Plan
Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1, 2, 3,  4, 5 and Zone 7
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #146  001-005
Pease AFB Ditches Draft RI/FS Report
Lee R. dePersia, Roy F. Weston,  Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEE Base Closure Division
16 November 1995
Forwarding Letters
Brooks Ditches  RFFS  (4.2)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #147  001-006
Pease AFB Superfund Site Brooks and Ditches  RI/FS  Comments
Gary S. Lynn, P.E., NHDES
Arthur Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
5 December 1995
Letter & Comments
 Brooks Ditches RIFS (4.2)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #148  001-001
Pease AFB Final Zone 3 Groundwater Model
Lee R. dePersia, Roy F. Weston,  Inc.
Arthur Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
18 December  1995
Forwarding Letter
Zone 3; Groundwater Model  (3.4)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #149  001-005
Re: Draft Brooks/Ditches Remedial  Investigation/Feasibility  Study
Michael  J. Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
19 December  1995
Letter & Comments
 Brooks Ditches RI/FS (4.2, 4.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

PEA (3.6) #150 001-001
Pease AFB Bioaccumulation  Risk Assessment  for  Pauls  Brook
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston,  Inc.
Jim Snyder,  AFCEE Base Closure Division
27 December  1995
Forwarding Letter
 Bioaccumulation Risk Assessment for Pauls Brook  (3.4)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #151  001-003
Pease Air Force Base  Installation Restoration  Program
Bioaccumulation Risk  Assessment for  Pauls Brook  Letter  Report
Gary S. Lynn, P.E. NHDES
Arthur L. Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
03 January 1996
Letter & Comments
Bioaccumulation Risk  Assessment for  Pauls Brook  (3.4)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT TITLE:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (3.6) #152  001-015
Pease AFB Brooks/Ditches Draft  Final RI/FS  Consolidated  Report  and  Responses  to
Comments
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston,  Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEE Base Closure  Division
08 May  1996
Forwarding Letter & Comments
 Brooks Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report (4.2, 4.5)
ARF  (Section 3.6 Binder)

-------
4.1 ARAR Determinations
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (4.1)  #1 001-024
  New Hampshire ARAR List Undate
  Richard Pease, NHDES
  Arthur Ditto, USAF
  13 April 1992
  Letter and Tables
   None  (Section 4.1 Binder)
  ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (4.1)  #2  001-B.3
  Installation Restoration Program Stage 4, Basewide ARARs, Pease Air Force Base, NH
  03803 - Draft
  Roy F. Weston, Inc.
  USAF
  January 1993
  ARARs
   None
  ARF

  PEA (4.1)  #3 001-002
  Waiverability of Env-WS 430, Surface Water Quality Regulations, as an ARAR
  Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
  Richard Pease, NHDES
  21 December 1993
  Letter
   None
  ARF (Section 4.1 Binder)

   PEA (4.1)  #4  001-025
  New Hampshire ARAR List Update
  NHDES
  USAF
  23 December 1993
  Letter with Attachment
  None
  ARF (Section 4.1 Binder)

 PEA  (4.1) #5 001-005
 Documentation of ARARs for Zone 1 Groundwater
 Roy F.  Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 30 June 1994
 ARARs
 Zone 1
 ARF  (Section 4.1 Binder)

 PEA (4.1)  #6 001-001
 Pease Air Force Base:  Resolution of Env-Ws 410 ARARs Issue
 Joan Miles, Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region I
 Anne Renner, EPA Region I
 Assistant Attorney General, New Hampshire
 Letter
 PEA (6.3),  PEA (11.2)
 ARF  (Section 4.1 Binder)

 PEA (4.2)  #1 001-B.39
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Initial Screening of Alternatives for IRP
Site 5,  Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1991
Report
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.2) #2 001-ACR.3
Installation Restoration Program Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site
5, Pease AFB, NH - Technical Report - Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
August 1992
Report
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #3 001-5.2.14
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site
5, Pease AFB, NH - Figures - Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
August 1992
Figures
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #4 001-1.3
Installation Restoration Program, Stage 3C, Feasibility Study for IRP Site
5, Pease AFB, NH Appendices A-I. Draft Final
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
August 1992
Appendices
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) 112 001-K.5-2
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Mclntyre
Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study-Draft FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
PEA  (3.5) 112 001-K.5-2
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #6 001-MM4B-7
U.S. Air Force Installation Program Pease AFB Zone 3 Initial Screening of
Alternatives- DRAFT
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Feasibility Study
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.2) #7 001-MM3-9
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program Pease AFB Zone 1 Initial
Screening of Alternatives Report Draft
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
May 1993
Feasibility Study
Zone 1
ARF  (Zone 1 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.2) #8 ES-l-ACR-3
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3
Feasibility Study Report Text- DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Report
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #9 A-l-L-6
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 3
Feasibility Study Report
Appendices-DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
November 1993
Appendix
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #10 001-R.4
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 1
Feasibility Study Report, Text - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December 1993
Feasibility Study
Zone 1
ARF  (Zone 1 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #11 001-J.7
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Zone 1
Feasibility Study Report Appendices - DRAFT FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
December 1993
Feasibility Study
Zone 1
ARF  (Zone 1 Shelf)

PEA  (4.2) #12 001-005
Submittal of the Zone 1 Technical Memorandum - Revised Ecological Risk
Assessments for Sites 4 and 44
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
03 August 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone 1; Site 4; Site 44
ARF  (Section 4.2 Binder)

PEA  (4.2) #13 001-f7-ll
Final Supplement to Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study
US EPA
USAFBCA
23 May 1995
Report
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (4.2) #14 iii-DIO
 Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Consolidated
 Report - Revised DRAFT FINAL
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 AFBCA
 November 1996
 RI/FS Report
 Brooks/Ditches RI/FS
 ARF
4.3 Proposed Plan

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (4.3) #1 001-R1
 Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plan for Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 January 1994
 Proposed Plan
 Zone 3
 ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (4.3) #2 001-R.l
Installation Restoration Program Proposed Plan for IRP Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
July 1994
Proposed Plan
Zone 1
ARF (Zone 1 Shelf)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 PEA  (4.3) #11 - DELETED
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (4.3) #3 001-R.l
 Installation Restoration Program, Proposed Plan for Zone 3, Pease Air Force
 Base, NH
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 June 1995
 Proposed Plan
 Zone 3
 ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)
4.4 Supplements and Revisions to the Proposed Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

4.5 Correspondence

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (4.4) #1 001-005
 Cost Estimate Error for Zone 1 Alternative MM-2
 Roy F. Weston, Inc.
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 18 July 1994
 Revised Cost Estimate
 Zone 1; PEA  (4.3)
 ARF  (Section 4.4 Binder)
 PEA  (4.5) #1 001-001
 Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Landfill 5 Feasibility Study Report
 USAF
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 Unknown
 Letter
 Landfill 5
 ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #2 001-002
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
25 November 1991
Letter
PEA  (6.4)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
(ARARs)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #3 001-001
Submittal of Secondary Document
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
09 January 1992
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #4 001-001
Submittal of Secondary Document
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
09 January 1992
Letter
Site 32/36; Site 34
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #5 001-001
Landfill 3 Decision Document
USAF
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
03 February 1992
Letter
Landfill 3
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.3) #6 001-001
Request for Deadline Extension for Review of the Draft IRP Site 5
Feasibility Report Dated April 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
22 May 1992
Letter
Site 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #7 001-001
Document Submittals
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 May 1992
Letter
Pea  (10.1); Site 34
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #8 001-001
Submittal of Landfill 5 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
12 Auqust 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #9 001-001
Submittal of Landfill 5 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
12 August 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #10 001-003
Landfill 5 Source Area Draft Final Feasability Study Report
Edward S. Barnes, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 August 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #11 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Landfill 5 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
18 August 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #12 001-001
Submittal of Draft Final Primary Document, Landfill 5 Feasibility Study Report
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
18 August 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #13 001-001
Landfill 5 Draft Proposed Plan
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 November 1992
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #14 001-001
Determination of Site Boundaries at the Time of Remedial Action
Implementation  (Will Migrate to Proposal)
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
2 December 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #15 001-002
Request for Deadline Extension
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
4 December 1992
Letter
Site 34
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #16 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 3 Initial Screening of Alternatives
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
17 May 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #17 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 3 Initial Screening of Alternatives
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 May 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #18 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 1 Initial Screening of Alternatives
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Richard Pease, NHDES
3 June 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #19 001-001
Submittal of Draft Secondary Document, Zone 1 Initial Screening of Alternatives
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
3 June 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #20 001-001
Submittal of Proposed Plans for Landfills 2 and 4 and Landfill 5
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
25 June 1993
Letter
Landfill 2, Landfill 4, Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #21 001-003
Former Pease AFB, Surface Water Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
29 November 1993
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #22 001-001
Regional Groundwater Model
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
John Regan, NHDES
3 June 1994
Letter
Haven Well
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #23 001-001
Memo for the Record
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Pease Air Force Base Administrative Record File
21 July 1994
Memorandum
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #24 001-002
Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report, Pease Air Force Base, NH
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
01 August 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone 1; Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #25 001-001
Zone 1 Feasibility Study
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
11 October 1994
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #26 001-001
ARARs
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
01 December 1994
Letter
Zone 5; Site 8
ARF  (Zone 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #27 001-007
Supplement to the Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
10 February 1995
Letter with attachment
Zone 3; PEA  (4.2)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #28 001-010
Zone 3 Draft Proposed Plan
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
13 February 1995
Letter with attachment
Zone 3; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #29 001-004
Natural Attenuation Modeling for Zones 2
Hampshire
Lee de Persia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
16 February 1995
Letter
Zone 2; Zone 3
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
and 3 at Pease Air Force Base, New
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #30 001-001
Forwarding Various IRP Documents
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Ronald Gehl, SCOPE
28 February 1995
Letter
PEA  (10.0)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #31 001-003
Site 5 Attenuation
Lee de Persia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
April 1994
Fax
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #32 001-001
Basewide Interim Monitoring Report No. 5
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 June 1995
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #33 001-005
RE: Draft Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study
Consolidated Report, Pease Air Force Base - November 1995
Michael J. Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, P.E., AFBCA
19 December 1995
Letter & EPA Comments
Brooks & Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report  (3.6 4.2)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #34 1001-015
Pease AFB Brooks Ditches Draft Final RI/FS Consolidated Report
Lee F. dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEE Base Closure Division
08 May 1996
Forwarding Letter & Response to Comments
Brooks/Ditches RI/FS Consolidated Report  (3.6 4.2)
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (4.5) #35 001-004
Draft Final Brooks and Ditches RI/FS and Air Force Response to the
Department's Review Comments on the Draft Brooks and Ditches RI/FS
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
25 June 1996
Letter & Response to Comments
Brooks and Ditches
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

5.1 ROD
PEA  (4.5) #36 001-005
Draft Final Brooks/Ditches Remedial Investigational/Feasibility Study
Consolidated Report, Pease ARE, May 1996
Michael Daly, USEPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
28 June 1996
Letter & Response to Comments
Brooks and Ditches
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)

PEA  (4.5) #37 001-001
Brooks and Ditches and Operable Unit  (OU)
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, USEPA
25 February 1997
Letter
Brooks and Ditches
ARF  (Section 4.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.1) #1 001-12.1
U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Pease AFB, Record of
Decision for a Source Area Remedial Action at Landfill 5
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
September 1993
ROD
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (5.1) #2 001-D97
Record of Decision, Zone 1, Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire - FINAL
USAF
EPA
NHDES
July 1995
ROD
Zone 1
ARF
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.1) #3 001-D139
Record of Decision, Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH -FINAL
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
AFBCA
September 1995
ROD
Zone 3
ARF  (Zone 3 Shelf)
5.2 Amendments to ROD
* NOTE:  NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

5.3 Explanations of Significant Differences

* NOTE:  NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

-------
5.4 Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #1 001-001
Region I ROD Model Language
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Unknown
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #2 001-002
Pease AFB IRP ROD Review Process
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
AFBCA/NE
15 December 1993
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #3 001-002
Getting to a ROD, Revised Milestones
Arthur Ditto, Pease, AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
4 February 1994
Letter
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4 Site 32/36
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #4 001-002
Signing of CERCLA RODs
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
AFBCA/NE
24 May 1994
Memorandum
Site 8; Zone 5
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #5 001-001
Railway Ditch Sediment Removal
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
28 July 1994
Letter
Railway Ditch; Zone 1; Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #6 001-002
Getting to a ROD
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
15 August 1994
Letter
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32/36; Site 45
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #7 001-001
Landfill 5 Remedial Action
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
30 September 1994
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #8 001-006
Document Review Schedule
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Richard Pease, NHDES
14 November 1994
Letter with attachment
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32/36; Site 45
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #9 001-002
Additional Reguests for Additional Documents for EPA Review
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
12 December 1994
Letter
Zone 1; Zone 2; Zone 3; Zone 4; Site 32 36; Site 34
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
2YPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #10 001-003
Pease Air Force Base Zone 1 Record of Decision
Lee de Persia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
16 February 1995
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #11 001-003
Project Status and Schedule, Pease Air Force Base, Newington, New Hampshire
Mary Sanderson, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
02 March 1995
Letter with attachments
None
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #12 001-001
Submittal of Draft Zone 1 Record of Decision
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
 11 August 1994
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #13 001-001
Draft Zone 1 ROD Review
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
John Corradetti, AFBCA/NE
11 August 1994
Memorandum
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #14 001-002
Landfill 5 Closure
Arthur Ditto
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
08 March 1995
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #15 001-001
Zone 1 ROD, Final Acceptance
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 March 1995
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #16 001-002
Zone 1 Record of Decision
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
Hank Lowman, AFBCA/NE
13 April 1995
Memorandum
Zone 1; PEA  (5.1) #6 001-D-97
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #17 001-003
Record of Decision for Zone 1 at the Pease Air Force Base Superfund  Site;
Newington and Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Declaration of Concurrence
Robert W. Varney, NHDES Commissioner
Alan K. Olsen, Director, AFBCA
13 April 1995
Letter of Concurrence
Zone 1; PEA  (5.1) #6 001-D-97
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #18 001-001
Zone 1 Record of Decision  (ROD)
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
20 June 1995
Letter
Zone 1 ROD; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #19 001-001
Draft Zone 3 Record of Decision  (ROD)
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Hank Lowman, AFBCA/NE
22 June 1995
Memorandum
Draft Zone 3 ROD; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #20 001-001
Zone 1 Record of Decision Document
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEE/ESB
20 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1 ROD
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #21 001-001
Zone 1 Record of Decision Document
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Richard Pease, NHDES
20 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1 ROD
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #22 001-001
Zone 1 Record of Decision Document
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
20 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1 ROD
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #23 001-001
Finalized Record of Decision for Zone 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCa
John Corradetti, AFBCA/NE
24 July 1995
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #24 001-A71
Zone 3 Draft ROD Comments Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto
02 August 1995
Letter & Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #25 001-005
Zone 3 Record of Decision Comments
Gary S. Lynn, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
04 August 1995
Letter & Comments
Zone 3 ROD  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #26 001-005
Submission of Signed Zone 3 ROD - FINAL
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Jim Snyder, AFCEE Base Closure Division
23 August 1995
Forwarding Letter
Zone 3 ROD  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

PEA  (5.4) #27 001-001
Submission of Signed Zone 3 ROD - FINAL
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA OL-A
Hank Lowman, AFBCA/NE
24 August 1995
Forwarding Letter
Zone 3 ROD  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #28 001-025
Comments on the Zone 3 Record of Decision
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
08 September 1995
Comments
Zone 3 ROD  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #29 001-002
Zone 3 Draft ROD Review Comments
Gary S. Lynn, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 September 1995
Comments
Zone 3 ROD  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #30 001-002
Signature Copy of the Pease AFB Zone 3 and Site 32/36 ROD
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 September 1995
Comments
Zone 3 and Site 32/36 RODs  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (5.4) #31 001-001
Pease AFB Brooks Ditches Draft Record of Decision, Contract No. F41624-
92-D-8009, Delivery Order 06, Document Control No. Pease 02280AGQ
Lee R. dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
28 February 1997
Delivery Letter
Brooks and Ditches
ARF  (Section 5.4 Binder)
6.1 Cooperative Agreements/SMOAs
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.1) #1 001-013
Memorandum of Understanding Executed Between the Town of Newington, NH,
Pease Air Force Base, NH
Town of Newington/USAF
USAF
22 August 1980
Memorandum of Understanding
None
ARF  (Section 6.1 Binder)
and
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.1) #2 001-004
Memorandum of Understanding  (MOU) between the U.S. Air Force Occupational and
Environmental Health Laboratory  (USAFOEHL) and Pease Air Force Base relating to
procedures for conducting the IRP
U.S. Department of the Air Force
Pease AFB
31 July 1987
Memorandum of Understanding
None
ARF  (Section 6.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.1) #31 001-020
Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement
USAF
NHDES
14 December 1992
DSMOA
None
ARF  (Section 6.1 Binder)
6.2 Federal Facility Agreement  (FFA)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.2) #1 001-097
Federal Facility Agreement under CERCLA Section 120
EPA: State of New Hampshire; USAF
EPA: NHDES; USAF
24 April 1991
Federal Facility Agreement
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)

PEA  (6.2) #2 001-003
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
16 January 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
Section 6.2 Binder)

PEA  (6.2) #3 001-003
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 February 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)

PEA  (6.2) #4 001-003
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
20 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)

PEA  (6.2) #5 001-002
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
17 April 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)

PEA  (6.2) #6 001-002
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
21 May 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.2) #7 001-002
Remedial Project Managers Meeting Minutes
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
24 June 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.2) #8 001-11.4
Modification 1 to Pease AFB Federal Facilities Agreement
USAF
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
8 September 1993
FFA Modification
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.2) #9 001-Attachment B
Submittal of the Quarterly Report for First Quarter 1995
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Michael Daly, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
23 May 1995
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.2 Binder)
6.3 Coordination-State/Federal
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3) #1 001-003
Meeting Minutes From Air Force Meeting With State Officials Concerning
Pease Air Force Base IRP
USAF
See Distribution List
11 March 1987
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3) #2 001-002
Agenda for Meeting with State DES, Air Force, and EPA Technical Team
Pease Air Force Base
See Distribution List
26 April 1990
Agenda
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3) #3 001-031
Completed Applications for Department of the Army Permit  (ENG Form 435) and
New Hampshire Wetlands Board Permit
Department of the Air Force
Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division
31 August 1989
Letter and Attachments
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA  (6.3) #4 001-002
  Letter Regarding Emergency Discharge Exclusion From the Reguirement for a
  Permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System  (NPDES)
  EPA
  USAF
  29 September 1989
  Letter
  NPDES
  ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

  PEA  (6.3) #5 001-002
  Letter in Response to Air Force Question Regarding Necessity of a Permit
  for the Proposed Landfill Cleanup Operation
  Department of the Army
  USAF
  17 October 1989
  Letter
  None
  ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3) #6 001-001
Agenda and Notes for Working Meeting with U.S. and State of New Hampshire
USAF
See Distribution List
21 November 1989
Agenda and Meeting Notes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3) #7 001-025
Letter Response to Air Force Letter of 22 August 1990 Regarding CERCLA
Remedial Actions at Pease Air Force Base, 404 Permit Not Reguired
Department of the Army
USAF
3 October 1990
Response Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3) #8 001-033
Point Paper on Installation Restoration Program  (Pease AFB) and Attachments
(Prepared for a meeting of J. Coit and M. Aldrich, of Senator Humphrey's
office, with Pease, NHDES, WESTON, and OEHL)
USAF
J. Coit & M. Aldrich of Senator Humphrey's Office
31 March 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3) #9 001-003
Recommendation to Place Pease AFB on the National Priority List  (NPL)
USAF
EPA
27 June 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#10 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of January 16, 1991
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
16 January 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#11 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of February 20, 1991
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 February 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#12 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
20 March 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#13 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
17 April 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#14 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 May 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#15 001-004
Notification of Additional Investigative Work in a Wetland
USAF
NHDES
14 June 1991
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#16 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
24 June 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#17 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
24 July 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#18 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 August 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#19 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
26 September 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#20 001-004
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
27 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#21 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 November 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#22 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes of January 27, 1992
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
19 December 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#23 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
27 January 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#24 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
25 February 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#25 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
07 April 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#25 001-004
NH Wetlands Permit for National List Related Work
USAF
NHDES
24 April 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#27 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
USAF
See Distribution List
22 April 1992
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#28 001-008
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
3 June 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#29 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
21 August 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#30 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
10 September 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#31 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, USAF
See Distribution List
20 October 1992
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#32 001-003
Application of the Reasonable Maximum Exposure  (RME) in Risk Assessments;
Request for Site Specific Justification for Using the "Average Maximum"
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Capt. Woerhle, AFCEE
22 October 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#33 001-001
Guidebook for Environmental Permits in New Hampshire
Richard Pease, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
4 November 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#34 001-Attachment 6
Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 1991
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
19 July 1991
Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

PEA  (6.3)#35 001-034
Quarterly Report, Third Quarter 1991
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
24 October 1991
Quarterly Report, Transmittal Letters
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

PEA  (6.3)#36 001-030
Quarterly Report, Fourth Quarter 1991
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
14 January 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

PEA  (6.3)#37 001-020
Quarterly Report, First Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
15 April 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

PEA  (6.3)#38 001-032
Quarterly Report, Second Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
14 July 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#39 001-043
Quarterly Report, Third Quarter 1992
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
20 October 1992
Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files

PEA  (6.3)#40 001-Q4
Transmittal Letter for Quarterly Progress Report, Fourth Quarter 1992
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 January 1993
Transmittal Letter and Quarterly Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#41 001-E,1
Quarterly Progress Report for Pease AFB
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA Region 1
Richard Pease, NHDES
26 April 1993
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#42 001-002
Notice of Intent for Storm Water Discharge Associated with Industrial
Activity Under the NPDES General Permit - EPA NPDES Form
Art Ditto, AFBCA
EPA Region 1
08 September 1994
EPA Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#43 001-007
Groundwater Treatment Plant Influent/Effluent Results, Quarterly Reporting
Art Ditto, AFBCA
EPA
15 November 1994
Report
NPDES Permit No. NH0090000
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#44 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
15 April 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#45 001-002
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
31 May 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.3)#46 001-003
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
16 December 1994
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#47 001-Attachment 1
Remedial Project Managers' Meeting Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Richard Pease, NHDES
19 June 1995
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)

PEA  (6.3)#48 001-B.2
Submittal of the Quarterly Report for First Quarter 1995
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
23 May 1995
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder); Arthur Ditto's office files
PEA  (6.3)#49 001-002
RPM Meeting Minutes from June 6,
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
26 July 1995
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 6.3 Binder)
1995 Meeting
6.4 General Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#1 001-003
Wetlands application No. 89-1805
NHDES
State of New Hampshire
14 September 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#2 001-001
Reguest for Information for Wetlands Permits
NHDES
USAF
18 September 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#3 001-001
Letter Regarding the Approval of Permit No. WPP-3348 for Landfill 5 Remediation
NHDES
USAF
11 October 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#4 001-005
Air Force Letter to the Wetlands Board Regarding a Reguest for Approval  for  a
Modification to the Wetlands Permitted Scope of Work"
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Delbert Downing, Wetlands Board, Concord, NH
21 November 1989
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#5 001-010
Letter to EPA Regarding Background Information on Pease Air Force Base
US Department of Commerce
USAF
7 March 1990
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#6 001-001
File #92-679; CERCLA Related Temporary fill of 2000 Sguare Feet for Wells at
Pease AFB, NH
Kenneth N. Kettering, NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
26 May 1992
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#7 001-019
Lab results of groundwater samples from monitoring wells 05-5113, 05-6101, and
08-6024.
NHDES
Art Ditto, Pease AFB
11 February 1993
Letter w/attachment
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#8 001-041
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance July, August and September  1993
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
October 1993
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#9 001-B.3
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance October, November and December 1993
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
January 1994
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR :
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#10 001-B.4
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance January, February and March  1994
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
April 1993
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
 LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (6.4)#11  001-022
 Pease Air  Force  Base  Installation Restoration Program January 13,  1994
 Informal Dispute Resolution Meeting - Final Minutes
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
 Michael Daly, EPA
 16  March 1994
 Letter  with Meeting Minutes Attached
 None
 ARF (Section  6.4 Binder)

 PEA (6.4)#12  001-001
 Ditch Maintenance Work,  Excavation Material Disposal
 Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 07  October 1994
 Letter
 Landfill 5: Grafton Ditch
 ARF (Section  6.4 Binder)

 PEA (6.4)#13  001-009
Air Force Reguest for Approval to  Place Excavated Materials from the Ditch
 Maintenance Work at Landfill 5  -  Protocols to be Used When Reguesting
 Regulatory Approval
 Richard Pease, NHDES
 Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
 02  November 1994
 Letter
 Landfill 5: PEA  (11.3)
 ARF (Section  6.4 Binder)

 PEA (6.4)#14  001-064
 Quarterly  Progress  Report,  Period of Performance:  Calendar Months  April,  May,
 and June 1994
 Roy F.  Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 July 1995
 Report
 None
 ARF (Section  6.4 Binder)

 PEA (6.4)#15  001-022
 Quarterly  Progress  Report,  Period of Performance:  Calendar Months  October,
 November and  December 1994
 Roy F.  Weston, Inc.
 USAF
 February 1995
 Report
 None
 ARF (Section  6.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (6.4)#16  001-004
 Background Contamination
 Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
 Richard Pease,  NHDES
 30  January 1995
 Letter  with attachments
 None
 ARF (Section  6.4  Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (6.4)#17 001-001
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
30 January 1995
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#18 001-001
Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
Meeting  Notification
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
20 March 1995
Memorandum
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#19 001-005
Quarterly Progress Report, Period of Performance July 1995 - September  1995
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
3rd Quarter 1995
Report
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)

PEA  (6.4)#20 001-003
RPM Meeting Minutes
Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
Mike Daly, USEPA; Gary Lynn, NHDES
12 January 1996
Letter & Minutes Attached
None
ARF  (Section 6.4 Binder)
7.1 Enforcement History

*NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

7.2 Endangerment Assessments

NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

7.3 Administrative Orders
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

7.4 Consent Decrees
PEA  (7.3)#1 001-11.3
Pease AFB Federal Facilities Agreement Modification
USAF
Pease AFB
EPA Region 1
NHDES
NH Attorney General
January 1993
FFA Modification
None
ARF  (Section 7.3 Binder)
* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

7.5 Affidavit

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

-------
7.6 Documentation of Technical Discussions/Response Actions

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

7.7 Notices, Letters, and Responses

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

8.1 ATSDR Health Assessments

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

8.2 Toxicological Profiles
                   PEA  (8.2)#1 001-ZN4
                   Installation Restoration Program Stage 4 Toxicity Profiles,  Pease Air  Force
                   Base, NH 03803
                   Roy F. Weston, Inc.
                   USAF
                   January 1993
                   Toxicity Profiles
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:  None
LOCATION:          ARF

8.3 General Correspondence

9.1 Notices Issued

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

9.2 Findings of Fact

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

9.3 Reports
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                   PEA  (9.3)#1 001-015
                   Landfill 5 Closure Wetlands Assessment and Mitigation Report
                   Roy F. Weston, Inc.
                   USAF
                   November 1993
                   Report
                   Landfill 5
                   ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)
9.4 General Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
                   PEA  (9.4)#1 001-001
                   Wetlands Assessment and Mitigation Report
                   Arthur ditto, Pease AFB
                   Michael Daly, EPA
                   Richard Pease, NHDES
                   3 December 1993
                   Letter
                   Landfill 5
                   ARF  (Section 9.4 Binder)
                   PEA  (9.4)#2 001-002
                   Trustees for Natural Resources
                   Arthur Ditto, AFBCA'OL-A
                   AFBCA/NE
                   20 May 1994
                   Letter with Attachment
SECOND REFERENCE:  None
LOCATION:          ARF  (Section 9.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:

-------
10.1 Comments and Responses
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#1 001-005
Response to Comments - Draft Final Community Relations Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
7 February 1991
Letter/Response to Comments
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#2 001-003
Draft Community Relations Plan Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
30 November 1990
Letter Comment Report
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#3 001-010
EPA Region 1 Comments to IRP Draft Community Relations Plan; Pease AFB
Douglas S. Gutto, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
7 December 1990
Letter Comment Report
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#4 001-011
EPA Comments on Pease AFB Community Relations Plan with Ar Force's Responses
Unknown (From Air Force)
USAF
January 1991
Comment Report
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#5 001-010
NHDES Comments on Pease AFB Community Relations Plan with Air Force Responses
Unknown (From Air Force)
USAF
January 1991
Comment Report
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#6 001-002
Review of Draft  (Revised) Final Report IRP Community Relations Plan
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
25 March 1991
Letter
PEA  (10.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#7 001-003
Comments Remaining Unresolved for Stage 4 Work Plan Analysis Method
Mark McKenzie, Pease AFB
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
05 May 1991
Comments
PEA  (3.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#8 001-002
Preliminary Assessment Site Inspection Draft Fact Sheet Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
17 April 1992
Comments
PEA  (10.6); PEA  (6.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
                          4 Work Plan Addendum Number 2
PEA  (10.1)#9 001-003
Review Comments for Stage
Richard H. Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
08 May 1992
Letter
PEA  (3.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
PEA  (10.1)#1 001-014
Review Comments for Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum
Number 2
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
14 May 1992
Transmittal Sheet, Letter and Comment Report
PEA  (3.1); PEA  (3.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#11 001-013
Review of Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Number 2
for Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
14 May 1992
Letter with Comment Report
PEA  (3.1); PEA  (3.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#12 001-006
Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary, May 1992 Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 June 1992
Comments
PEA  (6.3); Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#13 001-009
Review of the Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary for Pease Air Force Base,
Portsmouth, NH - May 1992
Michale Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 June 1992
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#14 001-006
Issues Needing Resolution for the Draft Final Remedial Investigation Report
for Landfill 5, Dated April 1992
USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
28 July 1992
Response to Comments
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#15 001-002
Stage 4 Work Plan Addendum 3 Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
14 August 1992
Comments
PEA  (6.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#16 001-026
Response to Comments on Zone 3 Site Characterization Summary
Lee dePersia, Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Capt. Carl Woerhle, AFCEE
1 September 1992
Letter with Comment Report
Zone 3; PEA  (3.4)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#17 001-002
Review Comments of Draft Landfill 5 Source Area Proposed Plan
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
10 September 1992
Comments
Landfill 5; PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#18 001-001
Review Comments for Landfill 3 - No Further Action Decision Document
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
2 October 1992
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#19 001-001
Review Comments for Landfill 3  (IRP Site 3)
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
2 October 1992
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#20 001-006
Response to Comments, Stage 4 Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 2
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
3 November 1992
Response to Comments
PEA  (3.3); PEA  (3.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#21 001-002
EPA Review of IRP Stage 4, No Further Action Decision Document  (NFADD)
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
5 November 1992
Comments
Site 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
for Site 3

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#22 001-002
Review of Stage 4 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum 3, Pease AFB
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
23 November 1992
Comments
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#23 001-003
Review of Comments of Stage 4 Site Characterization Summary, IRP  Zone  1
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, USAF
1 December 1992
Comments
Zone 1, Landfill 2, Landfill 4
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#24 001-004
Review of Zone 1, Site Characterization Summary for Pease AFB, October 1992
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
9 December 1992
Comments
Zone 1; PEA  (3.5)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#25 001-004
Review of Zone 1 Site Characterization Summary for Pease AFB
Michael Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
9 December 1992
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#26 001-004
EPA Review of IRP LF-5, Draft Proposed Plan, November 1992
Johanna Hunter, EPA
Arthur Ditto, USAF
17 December 1992
Comments
Landfill 5, PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#27 001-002
Response to Comments, Landfill 5 Draft Proposed Plan and Fact Sheet
Arthur Ditto, USAF
Johanna Hunter, EPA
5 January 1993
Response to Comments
Landfill 5, PEA  (10.6)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#28 001-001
Sierra Club Comments on Cleanup of Site 5 at Pease Air Force Base
Scott Drummey, Sierra Club
USAF
15 February 1993
Comments
Landfills
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#29 001-002
Proposed Plan for IPR Site 5, Landfill 5, Source Area
Seacoast Citizens Overseeing Pease Environment  (SCOPE)
USAF
22 January 1993
Comments
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#30 001-023
Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Zone 1, Initial
Screening of Alternatives Report, Pease AFB
EPA
USAF
27 August 1993
Comments
PEA  (10.10); Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#31 001-018
Response to EPA Comments on the Zone 1 Draft Remedial Investigation Report
USAF
EPA
15 October 1993
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#32 001-018
Response to NHDES Comments on the Zone 1 Draft Remedial  Investigation Report
USAF
NHDES
15 October 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 1; PEA(10.10)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#33 001-015
Response to the EPA Comments on the Zone 1 Draft FS Report
USAF
EPA
29 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#34 001-018
Response to NHDES Comments on the Zone 1 Draft FS Report
USAF
NHDES
30 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#35 001-033
Response to EPA Comments on the Draft Zone 3 RI Report
USAF
EPA
28 September 1993
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#36 001-024
Response to NHDES Comments on the Draft Zone 3 RI Report
USAF
NHDES
29 September 1993
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#37 001-008
Draft Response to EPA Comments on the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch
Draft RI/FS Report
USAF
EPA
9 November 1993
Response to Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#38 001-014
Draft Response to NHDES Comments on the Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch
Draft RI/FS Report
USAF
NHDES
8 November 1993
Response to Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Lower Newfields Ditch
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#39 001-003
Remedial Technology Peer Review, Pease International Tradeport and Air
National Base, New Hampshire, Peer Review
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
13 April 1993
Letter
Zone 5
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#40 001-003
Review of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Comments on Background Data
for Pease AFB, NH
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
11 June 1993
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#41 001-003
Peer Review of Initial Screening of Alternatives, Zone 3, Pease AFB, NH
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
2 July 1993
Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#42 001-004
Peer Review of Initial Screening of Alternatives, Zone 1, Pease AFB, NH
Fred Price, Mitre Corporation
Major Charles Howell, AFCEE
16 July 1993
Letter
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#43 001-005
Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Zone 1 Initial
Screening of Alternatives Report, Pease AFB, NH
EPA
USAF
27 August 1993
Letter with Attachment
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#44 001-012
Pease AFB Zone 1 Draft Feasibility Study Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
1 October 1993
Letter with Attachment
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#45 001-002
EPA Review of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook Sediment Evaluation Work Plan
EPA
USAF
16 November 1993
Fax
PEA(3.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#46 001-003
Response to EPA Comments Zone 3 Draft
USAF
EPA
22 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
FS
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#47 001-012
State Response to Comments Zone 3 Draft Feasibility Study
USAF
NHDES
22 November 1993
Response to Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#48 001-010
Pease AFB Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
29 November 1993
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#49 001-002
Work Plan to Evaluate the Sediments of Mclntyre Brook and Flagstone Brook
Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
29 November 1993
Comments
Mclntyre Brook; Flagstone Brook
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#50 001-003
Pease AFB Zone 1 Feasibility Study Report Draft Final Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
3 January 1994
Comments
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#51 001-004
Zone 3 Draft Final Feasibility Study Report Review Comments
NHDES
USAF
3 January 1994
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#52 001-010
Pease AFB, Zone 1 Draft Final Remedial Investigation
NHDES
USAF
29 November 1993
Review Comments
Zone 1; PEA(3.6)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#53 001-004
Review Comments, Zone 3, Draft Final Feasibility Study Report
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
3 January 1994
Review Comments
Zone 3; Section 4.2
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#54 001-003
Review Comments for Landfill 5 Proposed Plan
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
25 January 1994
Review Comments
Landfill 5; Section 4.3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#55 001-005
Review Comments, Zone 1 Draft Proposed Plan, January 1994
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
22 February 1994
Review Comments
Zone 1; Section 4.3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#56 001-012
Comments Draft Minutes of February 10, 1994 Meeting to Discuss State  Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
14 March 1994
Comments
Landfill 1, CRD-2
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#57 001-003
Comments Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program, Zone 3 RI Addendum  #1
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 June 1994
Comments
Zone 3; Section 3.5
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#58 001-001
Response to EPA Comments and Additional Responses to NHDES Comments on the
Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
21 June 1994
Response to Comments
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#59 001-019
Air Force Response to Comments
USAF
EPA
26 August 1994
Response to Comments
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#60 001-006
Response to EPA and NHDES Comments on the Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
USAF
16 June 1994
Response to Comments
PEA(3.5)#123 001-E.34; PEA(3.5)#124 001-007
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#61 001-007
Pease AFB Basewide Interim Monitoring Plan, Response to Air Force June 21, 1994 Letter
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
21 July 1994
Comments
PEA(3.5) #121 001-007
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#62 001-003
EPA Comments
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
undated
Comments
Site 9
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#63 001-005
Comments to the Zone 3 RI Addendum #2 Report, May 1994
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
01 July 1994
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#64 001-002
Comments on Pease AFB Zone 1 Feasibility Study
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
31 August 1994
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(4.2)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#65 001-004
Zone 1 Draft Record of Decision, August 1994, Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
20 September 1994
Comments
Zone 1; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#66 001-016
Response to Comments Zone 3 Addendum #1 and #2
Mark McKenzie, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
08 November 1994
Response to Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#67 001-100
Zone 1 Draft Record of Decision - Comments
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
14 November 1994
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#68 001-022
Response to NHDES Comments on the Air Force's 21 June 1994 Letter Responding
to NDHES 23 March 1994 Comments on the Pease AFB Basewide Interim Monitoring  Plan
USAF
NHDES
07 December 1994
Response to Comments
PEA(3.5) #121 001-007; PEA(3.5) #123 001-E.34;
PEA(3.5) #124 001-007; PEA(lO.l) #161 001-006;
PEA  (10.1)  #166 001 012
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#69 001-003
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report for Pease AFB, NH - Comments
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
11 January 1995
Comments
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#70 001-005
DDT Sediment Evaluation Report Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 January 1995
Comments
None
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#71 001-5.2
Sediment Bioassay and Hardness Letter Reports Evaluation Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 January 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(3.5) #120 001-008; PEA(ll.l)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#72 001-011
Zone 1 Draft Final Record of Decision
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
18 January 1995
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
                                         RI Addendums #1 and  #2 Comments  -
PEA  (10.1)#73 001-004
Air Force Response to the State's Zone 3
Outstanding Issues
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
19 January 1995
Comments
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
PEA  (10.1)#74 001-005
Zone 1 Draft Final Record of Decision, December 1994, Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
20 January 1995
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(S.l)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#75 001-008
Response to EPA Comments on the Draft Zone 1 ROD
USAF
EPA
14 December 1994
Response to Comments
Zone 1; PEA(S.l)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#76 001-003
Response to NHDES Comments on the Draft Zone 1 ROD
USAF
NHDES
14 December 1994
Response to Comments
Zone 1; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#77 001-003
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Zone 3 RI Addendum  - Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
15 June 1994
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(3.5)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#78 001-007
Table A-4, Documentation of ARARs for Groundwater - Alternative MM-2,  Limited
Action - Institutional Controls Long Term Groundwater Monitoring/Groundwater
Management Zone  (GMZ), Zone 1
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
18 August 1994
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#79 001-003
Review of Preliminary Signature Ready Zone 1
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
03 March 1995
Comments
Zone 2; Zone 3; PEA(S.l)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
                   ROD, Pease AFB, February 1995
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#80 001-003
Draft Final Zone 3 Proposed Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
13 March 1995
Response to Comments
Zone 3, PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#81 001-012
I. Air Force Response to Comments dated January 20, 1995, to  the  Zone  1  Draft
Final Record of Decision December 1994  (Zone 1 DFROD)
II. Preliminary Zone 1 Final Record of Decision, February 1995  (Zone 1 PFROD)
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
14 March 1995
Comments
Zone 1; PEA(5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#82 001-011
Zone 3 and Site 32 36 Draft Proposed Plan Fact Sheets
Mike Daly, EPA
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
30 March 1995
Comments
Zone 3; Site 32 36; PEA(10.6)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#83 001-006
Proposed Plan for Zone 3, March 1995; Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
17 April 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
PEA  (10.1)#84 001-004
Review of the Draft Final
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
18 April 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
Zone 3 Proposed Plan, Pease Air Force Base, NH, March 1995

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.1)#85 001-001
Zone 3 Proposed Plan, Response to Review Comments
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
27 April 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#86 001-002
Zone 3 Proposed Plan, Response to Review Comments
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Richard Pease, NHDES
28 April 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#87 001-003
Review of Protocol for a Bioaccumulation Study for Paul's Brook at Pease AFB,
New Hampshire
Mike Daly, EPA Region 1
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
07 June 1995
Comments
Paul's Brook
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#88 001-002
Zone 3 Proposed Plan Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
22 June 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)#13 001-R.l
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#89 001-008
Clarification of the State's Comments to the Zone 3 Proposed Plan, March 1995
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
11 July 1995
Comments
Zone 3; PEA(4.3)#13 001-R.l
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)

PEA  (10.1)#90 001-002
Response to EPA Region 1 Comments on the Protocol for a Bioaccumulation Study
for Paul's Brook at Pease AFB, NH
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
23 June 1995
Response to Comments
Paul's Brook
ARF  (Section 10.1 Binder)
10.2 Community Relations Plan
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.2)#1 001-040
Installation Restoration Program Community Relations Plan
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
EPA; NHDES; USAF
January 1995
Community Relations Plan
None
ARF, IR

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.2)#2 1-1.1
Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Revised Community Relations Plan
Dynamic Corporation
230 Peachtree St., N.W.,  Ste. 700
Atlanta, GA. 30303
USAF
October 1995
Community Relations Plan
None
ARF
10.3 Public Notices
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#1 001-001
Paid Advertisement of January 27,
Landfill 5 Source Area
USAF
Foster's Daily Democrat Public
23 January 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 5; PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder),IR
1993 Public Hearing on Proposed Plan for
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#2 001-001
Paid Advertisement of January 27,
Landfill 5 Source Area
USAF
Portsmouth Herald, Public
24 January 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 5; PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder),IR
1993 Public Hearing on Proposed Plan for
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#3 001-001
Paid Advertisement in Foster's Daily Democrat for Landfill 5 Revised Proposed
Plan Public Comment Period and Public Hearing
USAF
Foster's Daily Democrat Public
31 July 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 2; Landfill 4; Landfill 5; PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#4 001-001
Paid Advertisement in Portsmouth Herald for Landfill 5 Revised Proposed Plan
Public Comment Period and Public Hearing
USAF
Portsmouth Herald, Public
1 August 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 2; Landfill 4; Landfill 5; PEA  (4.3)
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#5 001-001
Public Notice Announcing the Signing of Two RODs; Site 34 and Landfill 5
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
Local Communities via The Portsmouth Herald, Public
4 October 1993
Public Notice
Landfill 5; PEA  (5.1)
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.3)#6 001-001
Paid Public Notice in Portsmouth Herald Announcing the Zone 3 and Site 32/36
Proposed Plan Public Hearing
USAF
Public
30 July 1995
Paid Public Notice
Zone 3; Site 32 36
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder)

PEA  (10.3)#7 001-001
Paid Public Notice in Foster's Daily Democrat Announcing the Zone 3 and Site
32/36 Proposed Plan Public Hearing
USAF
Public
29 July 1995
Paid Public Notice
Zone 3; Site 32 36
ARF  (Section 10.3 Binder)
10.4 Public Meeting Transcripts
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.4)#1 001-052
Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire Official Transcript of Public Hearing for
Proposed Plan for Landfill 5 Source Area
R & R Associates
P.O. Box 863
Exeter, NH 03833
USAF
27 January 1993
Transcript
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (10.4)#2 001-7.4
Public Hearing Summary of Pease Air Force Base Public Hearing on Landfill 5
Source Area Proposed Plan
Dynamic Corporation
USAF
27 January 1993
Hearing Summary
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf),  IR

PEA  (10.4)#3 001-025
Pease Air Force Base Public Workshop and Information Meeting; Installation
Restoration Program
Dynamic Corporation
USAF
12 January 1993
Meeting Summary
None
IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.4)#4 001-034
Pease AFB Official Transcript of Public Hearing for Revised Proposed Plan for
Landfill 5
R & R Associates
USAF
5 August 1993
Transcript
Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.4)#5 001-8.3
Final Summary of Pease AFB Public Hearing on the Revised Proposed Plan for the
Landfill 5 Source Area and the Consolidation of Landfills 2 and 4 Within Landfill 5
Dynamic Corporation
USAF
5 August 1993
Hearing Summary
Landfill 2; Landfill 4; Landfill 5
ARF  (Landfill 5 Shelf)

PEA  (10.4)#6 001-002
Pease Air Force Base Public Hearing for the Zone 1 Proposed Plan Sign-In Sheet
Not Applicable
USAF
18 August 1994
Attendance Sheet
Zone 1
ARF  (Section 10.4 Binder)

PEA  (10.4)#7 1.1-6.3
Summary of Pease Air Force Base Public Hearing on the Proposed Plan for Zone 1
Dynamic Corporation
USAF
18 August 1994
Hearing Summary Report
Zone 1
ARF  (Zone 1 Shelf)

PEA  (10.4)#8 001 - TAB #6
Summary of Pease AFB 1995 Environmental Open House
Dynamic Corporation
USAF
14 October 1995
Meeting Summary Report
none
ARF  (general shelving)

PEA  (10.4)#9 001-002
Sign-In Sheet for the Pease AFB Public Hearing for the Brooks Ditches Proposed Plan
Public
USAF
05 March 1997
sign-In Sheet
none
ARF  (10.4 Binder)
10.5 Documentation of Other Public Meetings/TRC Minutes
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
    PEA  (10.5) #00 001-004
    Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
    USAF
    See Distribution List
    22 February 1990
    Meeting Minutes
    None
    ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

    PEA (10.5)  #0  001-013
    Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
    USAF
    See Distribution List
    30 March,  1990
    Meeting Minutes
     None
     ARF(Section  10.5  Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE.
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #1 001-004
 Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 27 April 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #2  001-010
 Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution of Minutes
 30 May 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA  (10.5) #3 001-008
 Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 27 June 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #4  001-005
 Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 25 July 1990
Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #5 001-005
 Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 29 August 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #6 001-012
 Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 26 September  1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #7 001-008
 Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 31 October 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #8  001-004
 Meeting Minutes  of  the  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 29  November 1990
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5) #9 001-003
Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
31 January 1991
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #10  001-003
 Meeting Minutes  of  the  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 27  March  1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5) #11 001-006
Meeting Minutes  of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
24 April 1991
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
 PEA (10.5)  #12  001-003
 Meeting Minutes of  the  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 28  May 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section  10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #13  001-006
Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
25 June 1991
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #14  001-007
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 30  July 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section  10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #15  001-007
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List

-------
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
27 August 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA  (10.5) #16 001-010
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
01 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA  (10.5) #17 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
29 October 1991
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #18  001-013
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 26  November 1991
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5) #19  001-005
Meeting Minutes  of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
07 January 1992
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #20  001-003
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 31  March  1992
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #21 001-002
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution List
28 April 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #22  001-003
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 20  May 1992
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section  10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #23 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution List
28 July 1992
Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #24  001-005
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 29  September  1992
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section  10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5) #25  001-013
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
27 October 1992
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

PEA (10.5) #26  001-004
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
See Distribution  List
16 December 1992
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

PEA (10.5) #27  001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution  List
17 February 1992
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #28  001-003
 Meeting Minutes of  Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution List
 23  March  1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section  10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5) #29  001-006
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution  List
27 April 1993
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #30 001-006
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution List
 25 May 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #31  001-012
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution List
 29 July 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA  (10.5) #32 001-002
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution List
 27 July 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #33  001-008
 Meeting Minutes of the Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 31 August  1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #34 001-009
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 28 September 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #35  001-010
 Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
 USAF
See Distribution List
 26 October 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #36  001-011
 Technical Review Committee Meeting Minutes
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 30 November 1993
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #37  001-002
 Technical  Review  Committee  Meeting Minutes
 USAF
 See Distribution  List
 11  January 1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #38 001-003
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee
USAF
TRC Distribution  List
1 March 1994
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #39  001-012
 Meeting Minutes of Technical  Review Committee
 USAF
 TRC Distribution  List
 26  April 1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #40 001-001
January 13, 1994,   Informal Dispute Resolution Meeting - Final Minutes
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA/OL-A
AFBCA/NE
11 April 1994
 Memorandum
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #41  001-013
 Meeting Minutes of Technical  Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
 USAF
 TRC/RAB Distribution List
 5 May  1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #42 001-004
Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
USAF
TRC/RAB Distribution List
28 June 1994
 Meeting Minutes
None
ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #43  001-013
 Meeting Minutes of Technical  Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
 USAF
 TRC/RAB Distribution List
 26  July 1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF (Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.5)  #44 001-006
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
 USAF
 TRC/RAB Distribution List
 30 August 1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #45 001-011
 Meeting Minutes of Technical Review Committee/Restoration Advisory Board
 USAF
 TRC RAB Distribution List
 04 October 1994
 Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #46 001-010
 Pease  Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review
Committee Meeting Minutes
 USAF
 TRC RAB Distribution List
07 February 1995
Meeting Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #47 001-001
 Pease Air Force Base Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review
 Committee Meeting Cancellation Notice
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 TRC/RAB Distribution List
 28 February 1995
 Letter
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #48  01-014
 Pease Air Force Base  Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Meeting Minutes
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 TRC/RAB Distribution  List
 03 April 1995
 Minutes
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

 PEA  (10.5) #49 001-002
 Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
 Meeting Notification
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 Pease RAB/TRC
 21 April 1995
 Memorandum
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #50  001-006
 Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee (TRC)
Meeting Minutes
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 Pease RAB/TRC
 16 May 1995
 Memorandum for Distribution
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #51 001-020
 RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from June 6, 1995
 USAF
 See Distribution
 21 June 1995
 Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

    PEA (10.5)  #52  001-AH 2
    RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from June 6,  1995
    USAF
    See Distribution List
    26 July 1995
    Minutes
    None
    ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA  (10.5) #53 001-002
 Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
 Meeting Notification
 Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
 Pease RAB/TRC
 14 August 1995
 Memorandum
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

    PEA (10.5)  #54  001-005
    RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from August  22,  1995
    USAF
    See Distribution List
    11 September  1995
    Minutes
    None
    ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

    PEA (10.5)  #55  001-002
    Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
   Meeting Notification
    Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
    Pease RAB/TRC
    14 September  1995
    Memorandum
    None
    ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

 PEA  (10.5) #56 001-019
 RAB TRC Meeting Minutes from October 3, 1995
 USAF
 See Distribution List
 20 October 1995
 Minutes
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

PEA (10.5)  #57 001-002
 Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
Meeting Notification
 Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
 Pease RAB/TRC
 06 November 1995
Memorandum
 None
 ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #58 001-013
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from November 14, 1995
USAF
See Distribution List
20 November 1995
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #59A 001-002
   Pease  AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
  Meeting Notification
   Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
   Pease  RAB/TRC
   02 January 1996
   Memorandum
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #60 001-003
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from January 09, 1996
USAF
See Distribution List
12 January 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #61 001-002
   Pease  AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
  Meeting Notification
   Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
   Pease  RAB/TRC
   22 January 1996
  Memorandum
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #62 001-011
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from 30 January 1996
USAF
See Distribution List
12 February 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (10.5)  #63 001-002
   Pease  AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee
   (RAB/TRC) Meeting Notification
   Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
   Pease  RAB TRC
   18  March 1996
   Memorandum
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #64 001-015
  RAB TRC Meeting Minutes from 26 March 1996
   USAF
   See Distribution List
   05  April 1996
   Minutes
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #65 001-003
RPM Meeting Minutes from 26 March 1996
USAF
Michael Daly, EPA and Gary Lynn, NHDES
05 April 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #66 001-002
   Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
  Meeting  Notification
   Arthur Ditto,  AFBCA
   Pease RAB/TRC
   22 April 1996
   Memorandum
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #67 001-007
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from 30 April 1996
USAF
See Distribution List
13 May 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #68  001-002
   Pease  AFB  Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
   Meeting Notification
   Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
   Pease  RAB/TRC
   30 May 1996
   Memorandum
   None
   ARF(Section  10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #69 001-003
RAB/TRC Meeting Minutes from 11 June 1996
USAF
See Distribution List
27 June 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

   PEA (10.5)  #70 001-002
   Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee (RAB/TRC)
   Meeting
   Arthur  L.  Ditto,  AFBCA
   See Distribution List
   26 July 1996
   Memorandum with Agenda Attached
   None
   ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.5) #71 001-003
Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
Meeting Minutes
Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
See Distribution List
16 September 1996
Minutes
None
ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
     PEA  (10.5) #72 001-003
     Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
     Meeting Minutes
     Arthur L.  Ditto,  AFBCA
     See Distribution List
     11 October 1996
     Minutes
     None
     ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
     PEA  (10.5) #73 001-002
     Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
    Meeting Notification
     Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
     See Distribution List
     18 October 1996
    Memorandum with Agenda Attached
     None
     ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (10.5)  #74  001-004
   Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical  Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
   Meeting Minutes
   Arthur L.  Ditto, AFBCA
   See Distribution List
   10  December 1996
   Minutes
   None
   ARF (Section 10.5  Binder)

  PEA  (10.5)  #75 001-002
  Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
Meeting Notification
 Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
  See Distribution List
  20 December 1996
   Memorandum with Agenda Attached
  None
  ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (10.5)  #76  001-011
   Pease AFB  Restoration Advisory Board/Technical  Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
   Meeting Minutes
   Arthur L.  Ditto, AFBCA
   See Distribution List
   04  February 1997
   Memorandum with Attachment
   None
   ARF (Section 10.5  Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
     PEA  (10.5) #77 001-002
     Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
     Meeting Notification
     Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
     See Distribution List
     18 February 1997
    Memorandum with Agenda Attached
     None
     ARF(Section 10.5 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.5) #78 001-003
 Pease AFB Restoration Advisory Board/Technical Review Committee  (RAB/TRC)
 Meeting Minutes
 Arthur L. Ditto, AFBCA
 See Distribution List
 27 June 1997
 Meeting Minutes with Attachment
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.5 Binder)
10.6 Fact Sheets, Press Advisories, and News Releases
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.6)  #1 001-002
 News Release Regarding Presentation of the Second Interim Technical Report
 USAF
 Media
 21 September 1988
 News Release
 None
 ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.6) #2 001-003
 News Release Regarding the Underground Water Sampling Program
 USAF
 Media
 29 November 1988
 News Release
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.6 Binder)

 PEA (10.5)  #3  001-002
 News  Release  Regarding the Release of the Third Interim Technical Report
 USAF
 Media
 22 March 1989
 News Release
 None
 ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
    PEA (10.6)  #4 001-003
    Superfund Program Draft Interagency Agreement Fact Sheet
    EPA Region 1
    See Mailing List
    December 1990
    Fact Sheet
    PEA (6.2)
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)  IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
    PEA (10.6)  #5 001-008
    Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update: Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study Fact Sheet
    USAF
    1991 Mailing List
    October 1991
    Fact Sheet
    None
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)  IR

 PEA  (10.6)  #6  001-011
 Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update  Fact Sheet
 USAF
 1992 Mailing List
 December 1992
 Fact Sheet
 None
 ARF  (Section 10.6 Binder) IR

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
    PEA (10.5)  #7 001-008
    Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet:
  Proposed Plan for Landfill 5 Source Area
    USAF
    1993 Mailing List
   January 1993
   Fact Sheet
    Landfill 5; PEA (4.3)
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder) IR

    PEA (10.6)  #8 001-006
    Pease Air Force Base Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet:
    Preliminary Assessment/Site  Investigation
    USAF
    1993 Mailing List
    January 1993
    Fact  Sheet
    None
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder) IR

    PEA (10.6)  #9 001-002
    News Release 93-01 Comment Period Opens for Proposed Plan on Landfill 5
 Source Area
    USAF
    All Local News Media - Radio, Press, TV
    15 January 1993
    News  Release
    PEA (4.3);  Landfill 5
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder) IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA  (10.6) #10 001-008
 Revised Proposed Plan for Landfill 5  Source Area  and  the  Plan  to
 Consolidate Landfills 2 and  4 Within  Landfill 5 Fact  Sheet
 USAF
 See Mailing List
 July 1993
 Fact Sheet
 Landfill 2; Landfill 4; Landfill 5
 ARF  (Section  10.6 Binder) IR

    PEA (10.6)  #11 001-002
    News Release Final Plans Issued for Cleanup of Two Sites at Pease AFB
    USAF
    Media
    27 September 1993
    News Release
    Landfill 5; Site 34
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)

    PEA (10.6)  #12 001-006
    Pease AFB Installation Restoration Program Update Fact Sheet: Proposed
Plan for IRP Zone 1
    USAF
    Mailing List
   July 1994
   Fact Sheet
    Zone 1;  PEA (4.3)
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)  IR

    PEA (10.6)  #13 001-001
    News Release Regarding Zone 1 Proposed Plan Public Hearing
    USAF
    Media
   17 August 1994
   News Release
    Zone 1
    ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)  IR

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA  (10.6) #14 001-003
   News Release: Final Plans Announced for Cleaning Up Zone 1
   USAF
   See Distribution
   30 June 1995
    Press  Release
   Zone 1
   ARF(Section 10.6 Binder) IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.6)  #15  001-006
 Pease AFB  IRP Update  Fact  Sheet:  Proposed  Plan for  Zone  3
 USAF
 See Distribution  List
 June 1995
 Fact Sheet
 Site 32/36 and  Zone 3
 ARF (Section 10.6 Binder)  IR

   PEA  (10.6)  #16 001-001
   Article in Foster's Daily Democrat about the Zone 3 and Site 32/36
   Proposed Plan Public Hearing
   Foster's Daily Democrat
   Public
   August  1995
   Article
   Zone 3; Site 32/36
   ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)

   PEA  (10.6)  #17 001-001
   Article in Foster's Daily Democrat about the Zone 1 ROD Signing
   Foster's Daily Democrat
   Public
   13 September 1995
   Article
   Zone 1
   ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)

   PEA  (10.6)  #18 001-001
   Article in Portsmouth Herald about the Zone 1 ROD Signing
   Portsmouth Herald
   Public
   14 September 1995
    Article
   Zone 1
   ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.6)  #19  001-001
 Article  in  Portsmouth Herald  about  the  ROD  Signing for  Zone  3  and Site  32/36
 Portsmouth  Herald
 Public
 21  October  1995
 Article
 Zone  3;  Site  32/36
 ARF (Section  10.6 Binder)

PEA (10.6) #20 001-001
Article in Foster's Daily Democrat about the ROD Signing for Zone 3 and Site 32/36
Foster's Daily Democrat
Public
 21 October  1995
 Article
Zone 3; Site 32/36
ARF(Section 10.6 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.6)  #21  001-008
  Pease AFB  Installation  Restoration Program Update:  Proposed Plan for the
 Pease AFB Brooks and Ditches Operable
  USAF
  See Mailing List
  February 1997
 Fact Sheet
  None
  ARF(Section 10.6  Binder)  IR
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.6)  #22  001-001
  News  Release  Information Session and Public  Hearing Announced for the
 Pease AFB Site 21/23 Proposed Cleanup Plans
  USAF
  All Local Media
  12  October  1995
  Press Release
  none
  ARF(Section 10.6  Binder)
10.7 Responsiveness Summary
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA (10.7)  #1  001-016
  Landfill  5  Responsiveness  Summary
  Arthur  Ditto,  AFBCA
  Mike  Daly,  EPA Region  I
  Richard Pease, NHDES
  September 1993
  Responsive Summary
  Landfill  5
  ARF(Section 10.7  Binder)
 PEA(S.l) #2 001-12.1 (Landfill 5 Shelf in ARF)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
          PEA (10.7)  #2 001-006
          Zone 1 Responsiveness Summary
          Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
          Mike Daly,  EPA Region I
          Gary Lynn,  NHDES
          July 1995
          Responsive Summary
          Zone 1 OD (5.1)
          ARF (Section 10.7 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
          PEA  (10.7)  #3  001-007
          Zone  3  Responsiveness  Summary
          Arthur  Ditto,  AFBCA
          Mike  Daly,  EPA Region  I
          Gary Lynn, NHDES
          August  1995
          Responsiveness Summary
          Zone  3  ROD  (5.1)
          ARF(Section 10.7  Binder)
10.8 Late Comments
NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME
10.9 Technical Review Committee Charter
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA (10.9)  #1 001-004
 Pease  Air  Force Base Installation Restoration Program:  Technical Review Charter
 USAF
 See Membership List
 11 January  1990
 Charter with Attachment
 None
 ARF(Section 10.9  Binder)

-------
10.10 Correspondence
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
 PEA (10.10)  #1 001-001
Letter Regarding Concern about the Hazardous Waste Sites at Pease AFB
 Gordon J.  Humphrey,  U.S.  Senate
James F. McGovern, Acting Secretary of the Air Force
24 March 1989
Letter
None
 ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.10) #2 001-002
Letter Regarding the Migration of Air Force Hazardous Waste Beyond the
Pease AFB Perimeter
Town of Newington
Robert Field, Environmental Cleanup Advisory Committee, Portsmouth, NH
11 May 1990
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 10.10 Binder)

 PEA (10.10)  #3  001-008
 Letter Regarding Groundwater Sampling Conducted on Private Property
 USAF
 Will Gilbert, Newington,  NH
 6 June 1989
Letter
 None
 ARF(Section  10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10) #4 001-001
   Submittal  Letter for Draft Community Relations Plan for the Massachusetts
  Military Reservation  (MMR) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts
   Douglas S.  Gutro,  EPA
   Karen Cowden,  Roy F.  Weston,  Inc.
   19 June 1990
  Letter
   PEA (10.2)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10) #5 001-002
   Impact of  Base Closure  on Personal Responsible for the Installation
   Restoration Program and Public Affairs
   Merrill S.  Hohman,  EPA
   Col.  James R.  Wilson, Pease AFB
   27 August  1990
   Letter
   None
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.10) #6 001-001
Impact of Base Closure on Personnel Responsible for the Installation
Restoration Program and Public Affairs  (Your Letter, August 27, 1990)
USAF
Merrill S. Hohman, EPA
11 October 1990
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 10.10 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (10.10)  #7 001-001
   Submittal of Primary Documents (Community Relations Plan)
   USAF
   Jim Brown,  EPA
   24  October 1990
   Letter
   PEA (10.2)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #8 001-001
   Submittal of Primary Documents (Community Relations Plan)
   USAF
   Richard Pease, NHDES
   24  October 1990
  Letter
   PEA (10.2)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #9 001-001
   Community Relations Plan Development Extension
   USAF
   Johanna Hunter, EPA
   17  January 1991
   Letter
   PEA (10.2)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

PEA (10.10) #10  001-001
Community Relations Plan Development Extension
USAF
Richard Pease, NHDES
17 January  1991
Letter
PEA (10.2)
ARF (Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #11 001-001
   Submittal of Draft Final Primary Documents
   USAF
   Richard Pease, NHDES
   5 February 1991
   Letter
   PEA (3.1);  PEA (3.3)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #12 001-001
   Submittal of Draft Final Primary Documents
   USAF
   Johanna Hunter, EPA
   5 February 1991
   Letter
   PEA (3.1);  PEA (3.3)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

  PEA  (10.10)  #13 001-001
  Community Relations Plan
  USAF
  Johanna Hunter, EPA
  12 April 1991
  Letter
  PEA  (10.2)
  ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (10.10)  #14 001-004
   Basewide ARARs Pease AFB,  NH 03803,  January 1993,  Draft - Review Comments
   Richard Pease,  NHDES
   Arthur Ditto,  Pease AFB
   1  April 1993
   Letter
   PEA (4.1)
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (10.10) #15 001-005
Draft Record of Decision for Landfill 5 Source Area Remedial Action,
April 1993 - Review Comments
Richard Pease, NHDES
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
11 May 1993
Letter
Landfill 5
ARF  (Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #16 001-002
   Pease  AFB  Review of Landfill 5 Draft Record of Decision
   Johanna Hunter,  EPA
   Arthur Ditto,  Pease AFB
   13 May 1993
   Faxed Letter
   Landfill 5
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #17 001-011
   Pease  AFB  Zone 3 Remedial  Investigation Report Draft,  April 1993 - Review
  Comments
   Richard Pease,  NHDES
   Arthur Ditto,  Pease AFB
   20 May 1993
   Letter
   Zone  3
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #18 001-008
   Mclntyre Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch RI/FS Draft,  April 1993 - Review Comments
   Richard Pease,  NHDES
   Arthur Ditto,  Pease AFB
   24 May 1993
   Letter
   Zone  3
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

PEA  (10.10) #19 001-015
Review of the Air Force Installation Restoration Program, Draft Remedial
Investigation Report, Zone 3, Pease AFB, April 1993
Mike Daly, EPA Region I
Arthur Ditto, Pease AFB
26 May 1993
Faxed Letter
Zone 3
ARF  (Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA (10.10)  #20 001-004
   Review of  the  Air Force Installation Restoration Program Draft Mclntyre
  Brook/Lower Newfields Ditch Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, April 1993
   Mike  Daly,  EPA Region I
   Arthur Ditto,  Pease AFB
   26 May 1993
  Faxed Letter
   Zone  3
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA  (10.10) #21 001-001
   IRP Documents
   Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
   Ronald Gehl, SCOPE Technical Advisor
   23 March 1994
   Letter
   Site 8,  Site 32/36
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA  (10.10) #22 001-001
   Draft Final Community Relations Plan
   USAF
   EPA
   NHDES
   13 July 1994
   Letter
   PEA  (10.2)  #3
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA  (10.6)  #23 001-001
   Request for Permission to Use the Newington Town Hall for the Zone 1
   Public Hearing
   Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
   Newington Board of Selection
   18 July 1994
   Letter
   Zone 1
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

 PEA  (10.10) #24  001-001
 SCOPE
 Bradley Lown,  Portsmouth, NH
 Arthur  Ditto, AFBCA
 01 March 1995
 Letter
 None
 ARF  (Section  10.10  Binder)

   PEA  (10.10) #25 001
   Zone 3 and Site 32/36; Proposed Plan Public Comment Period
   Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
   Richard Pease, NHDES
   01 May 1995
   Letter
   Zone 3;  Site 32/36
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

   PEA  (10.10) #26 001-002
   Surface Water Sampling Pease AFB/Airport Road, Newington, Subject: Results of
Volatile Organic Chemicals and Pesticide Analysis
   Richard Pease, NHDES
   Peggy Lamson, Newington Health Officer
   25 May 1995
   Letter
   Site 45
   ARF(Section 10.10 Binder)

-------
11.1 EPA Headquarters Guidance
* NOTE: Guidance documents listed as bibliographic sources for a document already included in the
Administrative Record are not listed separately in this index.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #1 001-003
   Risk Assessment Issue Paper for Carcinogenicity Characterization for
  Trichloroethylene  (CASRN 79-01-6), Tetrachloroethylene  (CASRN 127-18-4),
  and Styrene  (CASRN 100-42-5)
   EPA
   USAF
   14  July 1992
  Guidance
   None
   ARF(Section 11.1 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1) #2 001-G.2
Draft Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed
Plan and Record of Decision
Office of Emergency & Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
March 1998w
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #3 001-B9
   The RPM Primer:  An Introductory Guide to the Role and Responsibilities of
  the Superfund Remedial Proj ect Manager
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,  EPA,  Washington DC
   USAF
   September 1987
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Dittos Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
  PEA  (11.1) #4 001-11.1
   CERCLA Site  Discrepancies to POTWs Guidance Manual
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,  EPA,  Washington,  DC
   USAF
   August 1990
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's  Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #5  001-041
   Framework for  Ecological Risk Assessment
   EPA
   USAF
   February 1992
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #6 001-E.l
   Preliminary Assessment Guidance Fiscal Year 1988
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,  EPA,  Washington,  DC
   USAF
   January 1988
   Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's Office

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1) #7 001-1.13
Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington,
(EPA/540/R-92/009)
USAF
January 1992
Guidance
PEA  (10.0)
Arthur Ditto's Office
DC
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1) #8 001-H.6
 Summary Report  on Issues in Ecological Risk Assessment
 EPA
 USAF
 February 1991
Guidance
 None
 Arthur Ditto's  Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #9 001-127
   Technology Screening Guide for Treatment of CERCLA Soils and Sludges
   EPA
   USAF
   September 1988
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #10 001-F.19
   Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies
   Under CERCLA - Interim Final
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response EPA,  Washington DC
   USAF
   October 1988
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1) #11 001-103
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
1190/91
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
   PEA (11.1)  #12  001-B.2
   Implementing EPA's Groundwater Protection Strategy for the 1990's;  Draft
 Comprehensive State Groundwater Protection Program Guidance
   EPA
   USAF
   1992
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's  Office

   PEA (11.1)  #13  001-021
   A Handbook  for  State Groundwater Managers
   Office of Water,  EPA, Washington,  DC
   USAF
   May 1992
  Guidance
   None
   Arthur Ditto's  Office

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
      PEA (11.1)  #14  001-3.40
      Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA
     Municipal Landfill Sites
      Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,  EPA,  Washington,  DC
      USAF
      February 1991
     Guidance
      None
      Arthur Ditto's  Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#15 001-F.2
Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed Plan, The
record of Decision, and Explanation of Significant Differences, The Record
of Decision Amendment
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
July 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#16 001-B.12
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation
Manual  (Part A)Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
December 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#17 001-057
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume II: Environmental Evaluation
Manual Interim Final
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA, Washington, DC
USAF
March 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PEA  (11.1)#18 	 Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#19 001-B.2
Superfund Removal Procedures Action Memorandum Guidance
EPA
USAF
December 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#20 001-G
RCRA Orientation Manual
EPA
USAF
1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#21 001-295
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles
EPA
USAF
November 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#22 001-017
Accessing Federal Data Bases For Contaminated Site Clean-Up Technologies
EPA
USAF
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#23 001-023
Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publications Describing Alternatives and
Innovative Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action and Site Remediation
EPA
USAF
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#24 001-111
Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies
EPA
USAF
May 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#25 001-A.20
CERCLA Compliancy with Other Laws Manual: Interim Final
USEPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington. D.C.
USAF
August 1988
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#26 001-A.6
Ecological Assessments of Hazardous Waste Sites: A Field and Laboratory
Reference Document
USEPA, Office of Research and Development. Washington. D.C.
USAF
March 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#27 001-E.8
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA
USEPA, Office of Research and Development. Washington.
USAF
September 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
D.C.

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#28 001-E.ll
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assessments Under CERCLA
USEPA, Office of Research and Development. Washington. D.C.
USAF
September 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#29 001-A.57
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual
USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
USAF
November 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#30 51532-51667
Federal Register: Part II. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 300,
Hazard Ranking System Final Rule
USEPA
USAF
14 December 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#31 001-054
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 - Human Health Evaluation
Manual  (Part B, Development of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals)
USEPA, Office of Research and Development
USAF
December 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#32 001-065
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 - Human Health Evaluation
Manual  (Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remediation Alternatives)
USEPA, Office of Research and Development
USAF
December 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#33 8813-8865
Federal Register: Part II. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 300.
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan Final Rule
EPA
USAF
08 March 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.1)#34 001-008
Final Guidance on Administrative Records for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions
EPA
USAF
20 December 1993
Letter with attachments
None
ARF Section 11.1 Binder)

-------
11.2 EPA Regional Guidance
*Note: Guidance documents listed as bibliographic sources for a document already included in the
Administrative Record are not listed separately in this index.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.2)#1 001-C.l
Land Disposal Restrictions Summary of Requirements
EPA, Region 1
USAF
August 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.2)#2 001-107
Supplemental Risk Assessment Guidance for the Superfund Program
EPA. Region 1
USAF
June 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
11.3 State Guidance
* Note: Guidance Documents listed as bibliographical sources for a document already included in
  the Administrative record are not listed separately in this index.
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#1 001-B.8
Interim Policy for the Management of Soils Contaminated from Spills/Releases
of Virgin Petroleum Products
NHDES
USAF
September 1991
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#2 001-C.15
Guidance Document for the Closure of Solid Waste Landfills in New Hampshire
NHDES
USAF
May 1990
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#3 001-D.7
Guidebook for Environmental Permits in New Hampshire
NHDES
USAF
1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#4 001-017
List of Standards and Advisory Levels Used by New Hampshire Division of
Public Health Services to Evaluate Drinking Water Quality
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public
Health Services
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
7 January 1993
Guidance
None
ARF  (Section 11.3 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#5 001-039
New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Part Env-A 1121
State of New Hampshire
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
12 August 1994
Guidance
None
ARF  (Section 11.3 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.3)#6 001-015
State of New Hampshire Human Health risk Assessment Protocols
Richard Pease, EPA Region
Arthur Ditto, AFBCA
10 April 19954
Guidance
None
ARF  (Section 11.3 Binder)
11.4 Air Force Guidance
* Note: Guidance documents listed as bibliographic sources for a document already included  in
Administrative Record are not listed separately in this index.
                                                                             the
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#1 001-024
Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Pease AFB. New Hampshire
Mitre Corporation. Civil Systems Division
USAF
20 June 1990
Letter report
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#2 001-016
Implementation of Department of Defense
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
11 December 1981
Policy Guidance Document
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
PEA  (11.4)#4 001-003
Relationship of the IRP to RCRA Enforcement Actions
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
26 December 1985
Policy Document
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
(DOD)  Policy  Guidance  on IRP  Policy  No.  1
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#5 001-002
Guidance for Air Force Installation Compliancy with Volatile Organic
Compound Regulations
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
8 October 198681
Guidance Document
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#6 001-003
IRP Decision Documentation Policy
Department of the Air Force"
See Distribution List
25 May 1988
Policy Letter
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#7 001-003
RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance to Installation
Department of the Air Force
See Distribution List
3 August 1988
Guidance Document
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#8 001-003
Guidance on Base Map Construction and Digitization D.O. 006 Pease AFB
Department of the Air Force
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
6 March 1989
Guidance Document
None
ARF  (Section 11.4 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#9 001-1.3
Handbook to Support the Installation Restoration Program Statements of Work
for Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies Version 3.0
Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory Technical Services
Division
Pease AFB
May 1989
Handbook
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#10 001-087
Air Force Logistics Command Public Affairs Environmental Guidance
USAF
Pease AFB
March 31, 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#11 001-IX.A1.3
Recommended Sampling Procedures
Air Force Occupational and Environmental Health Laboratory Technical
Services Division
Pease AFB
March 1989
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#12 001-1.5
Initiatives for Accelerating Cleanup at BRAG Installations
Department of Defense
Pease AFB
June 1992
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
PEA  (11. 4)#13 - Deleted
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.4)#14 001-104
Air Force Base Conversion Agency Environmental Public Affairs Guidance
AFBCA/External Affairs
Site Managers and Base Environmental Coordinators
December 1994
Guidance
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:

RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.5)#1 001-080
Geology and Groundwater Resources of Southeastern New Hampshire
U.S. Geological Survey and Environmental Health Laboratory Technical
Services Division
USAF
1964
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.5)#2 001-010
Preliminary Wetland Delineation and Evaluation Report for Pease Air Force
Base, NH - Draft
The Smart Associates, Environmental Consultants, Inc.
USAF
April 1990
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.5)#3 001-222
The Ecology of the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire and Maine: An Estuarine
Profile and Bibliography
Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH
USAF
October 1992
Technical Source
None
Arthur Ditto's Office
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11. 6) #9 001-005
Risk Assessment Data Needs and Sampling Procedures Letter Report
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
EPA: NHDES: USAF
8 March 1991
Letter Report
None
ARF  (Section 11.6 Binder)
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.6)#2 001-051
Analytical Methods Letter Report -- Supplemental Information to Stage 4
Sampling and Analyses Plan
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
EPA: NHDES: USAF
23 April 1991
Letter Report
None
ARF

-------
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

11.7 Correspondence

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:

AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:
DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:

DOCUMENT NUMBER:
LONG TITLE:
AUTHOR:
RECIPIENT:

DATE:
TYPE:
SECOND REFERENCE:
LOCATION:
PEA  (11.6)#3 001-055
Protocols for Generation of Baseline Risk Assessments for the Pease AFB
Sites-- Revised
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
EPA: NHDES: USAF
July 1991
Report
None
ARF
PEA  (11.7)#1 001-006
Letter to EPA Requesting Review and Concurrence of risk Assessment Data and
Sampling Procedure Letter Report
USAF
EPA
20 March 1991
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 11.7 Binder)

PEA  (11.7)#2 001-002
Analytical Methods for Pease AFB
Roy F. Weston. Inc.
USAF
23 April 1991
Letter
None
ARF  (Section 11.7 Binder)

PEA  (11.7)#3 001-001
Consolidated Background Values Letter Report
USAF
Richard Pease. NHDES
Johanna Hunter. EPA
March 9. 1993
Letter Report
None
ARF  (Section 11.7 Binder)
12.1 Privileged Documents  (Extractions)

* NOTE: NO ENTRIES IN THIS SECTION AT THIS TIME

-------