\
Section 319
NDNPDINT SOURCE PROGRAM  SOGCESS STORY
 Passive Treatment Systems Restore Water Quality  J

WatPrhndv ImnrnvpH  'AvC'c' m'ne drainage from abandoned coal mines impaired West
              " '  '   ''	     ""  Virginia's Morris Creek, prompting the state to add the creek to
 its 1996 Clean Water Act section 303(d) list of impaired waters for metals and pH. To restore the
 stream, project partners installed various passive treatment systems [e.g., anaerobic and aerobic
 wetlands, open limestone channels (OLCs), polishing ponds] at four sites in the watershed. As a
 result, metal concentrations in Morris Creek have dropped significantly. West Virginia proposes
 to remove this waterbody from the section 303(d) list in  2010.


 Problem

 Morris Creek flows through Kanawha County,
 approximately 25 miles southeast of Charleston,
 West Virginia, and joins the Kanawha River in the
 town of Montgomery. West Virginia first placed
 Morris Creek on the section 303(d) list in 1996 for
 metals and then again in 1998, 2000, 2002 and
 2004 for pH and metals. Stretches of the stream
 were devoid of aquatic life, and deposits of iron
 and aluminum existed at several points along the
 streambed, preventing the creek from supporting
 its warm-water fishery, drinking water and contact
 recreation designated uses (Figure 1).

 West Virginia developed a total maximum daily load
 (TMDL) study in 2005 for the Upper Kanawha River
 system, which includes Morris Creek. The TMDL
 analysis suggested that for Morris Creek to achieve
 water quality standards, metal loads would need
 to be reduced—aluminum by 5,900 pounds per
 year (Ibs/yr), iron by 8,007 Ibs/yr and manganese by
 4,444 |bs/yr.


 Project Highlights

 In 2002 the newly formed Morris  Creek Watershed
 Association (MCWA) contacted the West Virginia
 Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP's)
 Abandoned Mine Lands (AML) program and the
 U.S. Office of Surface Mining to request assistance
 in treating the acid mine drainage polluting Morris
 Creek. In response, AML and MCWA conducted a
 watershed-wide monitoring sweep and identified
 four primary project sites.

 By 2003 AML began planning for  passive treat-
 ment systems at the four sites—Possum Hollow,
 Blacksnake Hollow, Lower Mainstem and Upper
 Mainstem Morris Creek. The Possum Hollow site
 treatment system consists of an aerobic wetland,
                               Figure 1. Acid mine drainageflows into Morris Creek.

                               40 by 350 feet, with 3 to 18 inches of limestone in
                               a 60-mil liner, and a polishing pond with an area of
                               25 by 60 feet. The second site, Blacksnake Hollow,
                               is in a small, very steep area with several acid mine
                               drainage sources seeping out of the hillside from
                               old mine voids. Although a low volume of water
                               typically flows from Blacksnake Hollow (10.5 gallons
                               per minute), the flow contributed highly acidic water
                               (246  milligrams per liter) before the project. The
                               steep terrain and lack of space required partners
                               to select OLCs as the treatment system. Check
                               dams in the OLC slow water flow and lengthen the
                               treatment time. Although project partners expected
                               the Blacksnake Hollow project to accomplish the
                               least amount of water quality treatment of any of
                               the projects, they believed that, when combined
                               with  the treatment success of upstream systems
                               would help to fully restore Morris Creek.
                                                                           it
                                   The third and fourth sites are upstream from a
                                   residential section of Morris Creek, where the old
                                   Eureka #2 mine discharges highly acidic water
                                   from several seeps and collapsed portals adjacent

-------
             to the stream for several hundred feet. Two proj-
             ects were designed to treat these sources: the
             Lower Mainstem and the Upper Mainstem sites.
             The Lower Mainstem passive treatment system
             consists of an anaerobic wetland with five 30 by
             250-foot cells lined with 6 to 9 inches of limestone
             in a 60-mil liner, a 30 by 100-foot-wide polishing
             pond, and wetland plantings consisting of cat-
             tails,  bull rushes and common rushes. The Upper
             Mainstem treatment system is the largest of the
             four projects. To treat the discharges adjacent to
             the creek, partners installed a 15 by 450-foot-wide
             drainage channel with five check dams  lined with a
             12-inch layer of limestone (Figure 2). The creek itself
             is routed through a 450-foot OLC to add alkalinity.
             Results
             Partners finished installing treatment systems in
             September 2006. Water quality improved immedi-
             ately. Initial monitoring results showed that Morris
             Creek and its tributaries (Possum and Blacksnake
             hollows) met water quality standards for pH,
             aluminum, iron and manganese below the treatment
             sites. In fact, the treatment systems reduced metal
             loads far beyond that required by the TMDL (Table 1).
             In response, aquatic life is returning to the creek,
             including a surviving population of brown trout fin-
             gerlings  (stocked by Trout Unlimited). DEP expects to
             remove Morris Creek from the 303(d) list of impaired
             waters in 2010 if conditions remain improved.

             Some challenges remain. Flooding and sediment
             accumulation have caused some problems with the
             systems in the two years since construction. The
             efficiency of the Lower Mainstem treatment system
             has declined, allowing the iron levels to rise again in
Table 1. Initial environmental results after installing acid
mine drainage treatment systems in the Morris Creek
watershed. *
Project site
Possum Hollow
Blacksnake Hollow
Lower Mainstem
Upper Mainstem
Total Reductions
TMDL Allocations
pH level:
pre/post
treatment
3.5/6.7
4.4/5.0
4.0/6.3
4.2/5.4
-
-
Metal reductions achieved
Aluminum
(Ibs/yr)
390.55
84.45
1,759.3
31,006.75
33,248
5,900
Iron
(Ibs/yr)
47.45
76.65
9,249.1
276,483.85
285,857
8,007
Manganese
(Ibs/yr)
102.2
36.86
1,098.65
31,119.9
32,320
4,444
Figure 2. The Upper Mainstem Morris Creek treat-
ment system includes a drainage channel lined with
limestone.

the creek below this site. However, pH and alumi-
num  continue to meet water quality standards. The
partners plan to secure an engineering review of
the system to isolate the problem and fix it.

Although the creek is not officially considered
impaired for sediment, partners recognize that
excess sediment is entering the creek. As part of
the comprehensive effort to restore Morris Creek,
the DEP Nonpoint Source Program applied to the
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency for two
grants to reduce sediment loads. The Phase I proj-
ect, completed in September 2007, restored 1,500
feet of abandoned road, armored culvert outfalls
and improved road drainage. The project should
reduce sediment entering Morris Creek above the
Upper Mainstem site by 213 tons/year. Another
part of this project reduced erosion pressure from
a large slip area known as the Jones  Hollow Slip.
This section of the project should reduce sediment
by 370 tons/year. Phase II, which began  in 2008,
includes stabilizing stream banks along the residen-
tial section of Morris Creek.
                                                                Partners and Funding
                                                                The projects received a nonfederal match
                                                                of $971,810: $312,683 from the Watershed
                                                                Cooperative Agreement Program (state matching
                                                                funds) and $659,127 from AML. The DEP Nonpoint
                                                                Source Program contributed $690,167 in section
                                                                319 funds. Project costs totaled $1,661,977. The
                                                                MCWA provided project assistance and initiated
                                                                valuable partnerships, such as that with the DEP
                                                                Nonpoint  Source Program.  The success of these
                                                                projects is due in large part to the MCWA.
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                  Office of Water
                  Washington, DC

                  EPA841-F-08-001FF
                  November 2008
For additional information contact:
Alvan Gale
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
601 57th Street, SE
Charleston, WV 25304
304-926-0495
alvan.d.gale@wv.gov

-------