EPA/ROD/R05-97/028
1997
EPA Superfund
Record of Decision:
REILLY TAR & CHEMICAL CORP. (DOVER PLANT)
EPA ID: OHD980610042
OU01
DOVER, OH
03/31/1997
-------
RECORD OF DECISION DECLARATION
FINAL ACTION REMEDIAL
Reilly Tar and Chemical Company Site
Dover, Ohio
Site Name and Location
The Reilly Tar and Chemical Company site is a 3.66 acre parcel of land situated in Dover, Ohio, on Third
Street, southeast of the junction of State Route 211 and State Route 39, three-quarters of a mile north of
the junction of Sugar Creek and the Tuscarawas River. Current land use adjacent to the study area is mainly
commercial and residential north of the site toward the Dover downtown area, and industrial to the west and
southwest.
Statement and Basis of Purpose
This decision document represents the selected final remedial action for the Reilly Tar and Chemical Company
site. This action was developed pursuant to the Comprehensive environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
("SARA"), and the National Contingency Plan ("NCP"). This decision is based on the administrative record for
the Reilly Tar and Chemical Company site. The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency has indicated verbally
that they concur with the selected remedy. A letter of concurrence is expected by April 4, 1997.
Assessment of the Site
Actual threatened releases of hazardous substances from the site, if not addressed by implementing the
remedial action selected in this Record of Decision, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to
public health, welfare, or the environment.
Description of the Remedy
The selected remedy, Alternative 3, includes
! Institutional controls to completely restrict the use of groundwater on-site and to restrict the
property to industrial/commercial use;
! Excavation and off-site thermal treatment of drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and
impacted perched zone material from the collection trench installation contaminated with greater than
100 ppm Benzo(a)Pyrene- Total Equivalent ("B(a)P-TE"),
! Excavation and on-site disposal of surface water drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and
impacted perched zone material contaminated with less than 100 ppm B (a)P-TE, and greater than 5 ppm
B(a)P-TE;
! Construction of an Ohio Subtitle D Solid Waste Cover over on-site disposed materials; a soil cover
over the remainder of the site;
! Off-site disposal of solidified tarry materials, or recycle of tarry materials as a fuel or feedstock;
! Hydraulic control and collection of perched ground water;
! Natural attenuation/long-term monitoring of shallow ground water;
! Sampling and analysis of sediments in the river to monitor ecological risk to aquatic species.
-------
Statutory Determinations
The final remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with Federal and State
requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the remedial action, and is
cost-effective. This remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the
maximum practicable. The selected alternative also satisfies the preference for treatment as a principal
element.
Because this remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining on-site, a review will be conducted to
ensure that the remedy continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment within 5
years after the commencement of this remedial action.
RECORD OF DECISION DECLARATION
FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION
Reilly Tar and Chemical Company Site
Dover, Ohio
Table of Contents
I. SITE NAME AND LOCATION 1
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 1
A. Site History 1
B. Site Assessment/Enforcement History 1
C. Expedited Response Actions 2
III. HIGHLIGHT OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 3
IV. SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT 3
V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 4
A. Physical Characteristics 4
B. Nature and Extent of Contamination 7
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 16
A. Human Health Risk Assessment 16
B. Ecological Risk Assessment 21
VII. DESCRIPTION OF SITE-WIDE ALTERNATIVES 22
A. Remedial Action Objectives and Cleanup Levels 22
B. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements 23
C. Alternatives Listing 25
VIII. SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 26
A. Threshold Criteria 27
B. Primary Balancing Criteria 28
C. Modifying Criteria 29
IX. SELECTED REMEDY 29
X. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS 32
Appendix A: Potential Federal and State Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Regulations
Appendix B: Administrative Record Index
Appendix C: State of Ohio Letter of Concurrence
-------
I. SITE NAME AND LOCATION
The Reilly Tar and Chemical Company site ("the Site") is a 3.66 acre parcel of land situated in Dover, Ohio,
on Third Street, southeast of the junction of State Route 211 and State Route 39, three-quarters of a mile
north of the junction of Sugar Creek and the Tuscarawas River (Figure 1). The Site is bordered on the
northeast by an abandoned canal turning basin, which functions today as a drainage ditch directing storm
water runoff from the City of Dover into the Tuscarawas River. Current land use adjacent to the study area
is mainly commercial and residential north of the Site toward the Dover downtown area, and industrial to the
west and southwest. Public power and sewage facilities are immediately east of the Site, and an open and
undeveloped industrial area south of the Site is currently used for fill and borrow disposal. The area
around the Site is crisscrossed with abandoned and active railroad tracks (Figure 2).
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
A. ) Site History
The former Reilly tar plant in Dover, Ohio and adjacent areas have an extensive industrial history that began
in the mid-1800s. The development of the Site includes part of the Ohio Canal, which paralleled the
Tuscarawas River, the local pig iron blast furnace industry, a coking plant and foundry, and a coal tar
refinery. The Site was established by the F. J. Lewis Manufacturing Co., on a parcel of land positioned
between the Hanna Furnace Co., a blast furnace facility and the coke oven facility of the Dover By-Products
Coke Company. The tar refinery was built on top of 10 to 20 feet of slag disposed there earlier by the blast
furnace operations. A large area south of the refinery was also covered with slag, which was mined out
during the 1940s and 1950s. This mined area, and the former Ohio Canal running along the east border of this
area, were then used as a city dump from at least 1957 to 1969. There is some indication from aerial
photographs that portions of the Ohio Canal were filled with municipal waste and trash prior to this period.
Coal tar refining operations were conducted on the Site from approximately 1921 through 1956. During that
time, coal tar wastes accumulated on the ground from spillage and other Site activities. Reilly Industries,
Inc. owned and operated the Site as a coal tar refinery from at least 1932 to 1956. The Site has been vacant
and inactive since 1956, when Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation sold the property. The property has passed
through several owners since 1956 and is presently owned by Ronald and Lois Quillin.
B.) Site Assessment/Enforcement History
Reilly submitted a Notification of Hazardous Waste Site form to the U.S. EPA in June 1981. The form
identified the general and specific types of waste at the Site to be "organic" and "creosote", respectively.
During March of 1985, five ground water monitoring wells were installed on the Site by Herron Consultants,
Inc., with personnel from Ecology & Environment, Inc., and Region V FIT supervising the drilling, soil
sampling, and well installation. The investigation was performed to generate ground water data for the
Hazard Ranking System model.
Ground water was found to flow east southeast across the Site. Tar was detected in one well (EPA Well MW-3).
Ground water sampling was conducted to determine if contaminants were leaking into the ground water. Three
of the EPA wells, MW-2, MW-4, and MW-5, were found to contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ("PAH")
(Figure 3). Volatile organics, primarily chloroform, 1,1,1 Tricholorethane, and carbon tetrachloride were
detected in the off-site and upgradient well (EPA Well MW-1). The report summarizing this investigation was
dated February 11, 1986, and titled "Hydrogeologic Report on the Reilly Tar and Chemical Company Site, Dover,
Ohio" (Ecology and Environment, Inc., 1986).
In July 1988, seven soil samples were collected and analyzed for PAH by the U.S. EPA. Results of the
analyses indicated the presence of PAH compounds common to coal tar. The background soil sample detected
only trace amounts of a few PAH compounds. A Hazard Ranking Score was prepared by EPA for the Site based on
information and assumptions concerning the risk to the local population, the potential migration of hazardous
-------
substances in the ground water, the potential contamination of drinking water supplies, and the potential for
direct contact. The Site was scored at 31.38 and was subseguently proposed for addition to the National
Priorities List ("NPL") on July 24, 1988.
In early October 1988, under a Consent Order executed by USEPA, Reilly Industries and Ronald and Lois Quillin
erected a fence around the Site. Pursuant to a Unilateral Administrative Order ("UAO") issued by U.S. EPA to
Reilly Industries and Ronald and Lois Quillin on March 29, 1989, a Remedial Investigation ("RI") was
undertaken. The results of this investigation are discussed in detail below. The Remedial Investigation
Report for the Reilly Tar and Chemical Corporation, Dover, Ohio dated June 1993 may be found in the Site
repository, at the Dover Public Library, and in the Administrative Record.
C.) Expedited Response Actions
An Expedited Response Action ("ERA") for removal of surficial coal tar and asphalt materials at the Site was
performed by Reilly Industries during June and July 1990. All work was performed under U.S. EPA oversight,
in accordance with the Health and Safety Plan prepared for the ERA. U.S. EPA oversight was provided by the
Region V, Emergency Response Section On-Site Coordinator ("OSC") and the U.S. EPA Technical Assistance Team
("TAT") contractor, Roy F. Weston, Inc. A total of 90 truck loads of surficial coal tar materials were
hauled off Site in 40 days. The total guantity of material removed was 1,442 tons.
Three types of surficial coal tar materials were encountered during the ERA. These materials included
residual asphaltic coal tar material, highly viscous coal tar, and broken slag saturated with coal tar. The
residual asphalt was found in many areas of the Site. Coal tar was found around the perimeter of the main
foundation, within and surrounding two smaller foundations or sumps; within the former canal turning basin;
and in a limited section in the eastern part of the Site. The slag mixed or saturated with coal tar was
confined to two locations (the smaller foundations/sumps).
When the ERA was performed and at the present time, the coal tar material is not a listed hazardous waste
under state or federal hazardous waste regulations (OAC 3745-51 and 40 CFR Part 261). Representative
composite samples of coal tar, asphaltic materials, and slag were tested and found to be non-hazardous by the
EP toxicity test. Thus, the coal tar materials were not a RCRA characteristic hazardous waste. However,
because the coal tar materials contained hazardous substances (primarily PAH), Reilly Industries disposed the
non-hazardous wastes in a RCRA Subtitle C landfill (Envirosafe Services of Ohio, Oregon, Ohio).
III. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
The U.S. EPA conducted community relations activities throughout the RI and Feasibility Study ("FS") to
provide interested citizens and officials information about progress at the Site.
On May 24, 1990 a letter was sent to all Concerned Citizens detailing the purpose of the ERA. On April 4,
1991 a news release and a letter to concerned citizens was sent out explaining that the Site was now entering
the RI/FS stage. The site repository was established on April 23, 1991 making available all approved
documents to concerned citizens. A public information session was then held on April 30, 1991,
representatives from U.S. EPA and OEPA were present in order to answer guestions and concerns the public had
on the proposed work for the site. Summary fact sheets were distributed May 8, 1991.
Once the RI/FS was completed, a proposed plan was issued to present the selected remedial alternative to the
public. A public comment period was held from January 15, 1997 to February 15, 1997 during which the public
was allowed to formally comment on the proposed alternative, concerned citizens were able to present their
concerns, perceived problems or other potentially unknown information which U.S. EPA then considers when
making the final decision on a remedial alternative. A public information session was held to present the
chosen remedial alternative and to solicit comments and address concerns from the citizens and local
officials on the proposed alternative. The meeting was held on January 22, 1997.
-------
IV. SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT
The remedial response action in this Record of Decision encompasses the entire Site, with the possible
exception that there may be another response forthcoming based on further assessment of ecological risks in
the Tuscarawas River. More will be said about this under the Summary of Site risks and the Selected Remedy.
V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS
A. ) Physical Characteristics
i.) Surface Features
Surface features on and surrounding the Site include buildings, vacant building foundations, roadways,
parking lots, railroad tracks, telephone/power poles, open fields, waterways, a power substation and
topographical features. The surface of the Site is covered primarily by unconsolidated slag and demolition
debris. Topographically, the Site is relatively flat with the exception of a steep slope along the east
property boundary near a power substation, and an abandoned canal turning basin along the northeast property
line. The Site is approximately 15 feet higher in elevation than the abandoned canal turning basin.
Four building foundations from former Site operations remain on Site. A large foundation, approximately 300
feet long and 50 feet wide, is located near the northern property line. The elevation of the concrete floor
of the large foundation is 874.8 feet above MSL at its southwest end, approximately 8 feet below ground
surface. The foundation floors are approximately 1 ^L feet thick. Near the middle of this foundation is a
southern extension approximately 35-feet wide by 35-feet long. The foundation walls extend about 2 to 3 feet
above ground surface. Three additional concrete foundations are located to the south and southeast of the
large foundation. Two foundations are located near the center of the Site approximately 65 feet south of the
large foundation. These concrete foundation walls are flush with the ground surface while the floors extend
about 2 feet below the ground surface. The third foundation is located approximately 200 feet southeast of
the large foundation. This concrete foundation extends approximately 2 feet above ground surface.
A storm water drainage ditch (approximately 350-feet long) parallels the northeast Site property boundary.
Storm water enters the drainage ditch through an 80-inch culvert pipe. Storm water exits the drainage ditch
into a 48-inch culvert pipe. The storm water ditch is bounded on the northeast and southwest by steep
slopes. South of the Site is vacant and undeveloped land that gently slopes to the south.
ii.) Surface Water
There are no surface water bodies on the Site except for standing water that occasionally lies within the
building foundations and open excavations. Surface water bodies adjacent to the Site include the storm water
drainage ditch, Sugar Creek and the Tuscarawas River. The storm water drainage ditch receives water from
the City of Dover storm water sewers in the downtown area. The storm water drainage discharges directly into
the Tuscarawas River, The bottom of the storm water ditch is near the top of the clay layer and may receive
recharge from the perched aguifer during dry periods. During dry periods, water generally does not flow in
the storm water ditch, however, standing water has usually been observed in portions of the storm water ditch
Sugar Creek is located approximately one-half mile south-southwest of the Site. Sugar Creek is a shallow
stream generally about 50 feet wide. Its origin is at the Mead City Dam approximately 9 miles north of the
Site. Sugar Creek flows southeast and discharges into the Tuscarawas River. The Tuscarawas River is
located approximately 210 feet east of the Site. The Tuscarawas River is approximately 150-feet wide and
flows north to south. The Tuscarawas River is dammed at several locations to maintain constant pool
elevation. A fixed-head dam is located near the Site and immediately south of the City of Dover waste-water
treatment plant.
iii.) Geology
The Site lies within an ancient river valley, trending roughly northwest-southeast, formed by stream erosion
and subseguently filled with glaciofluvial outwash deposits. The unconsolidated sediments extend
approximately 185 to 215 feet below the ground surface. Underlying the unconsolidated sediments are
-------
Pennsylvania!! Age conglomerates, sandstones, shales, limestones and coals of the Allegheny Plateau.
iv.) Soils
In general, the Site is underlain by 13 to 19 feet of solidified slag, except in the far western portion.
Surficial material in the far western portion of the Site and off-site locations consists primarily of fill
material (e.g., sand, gravel, wood, brick, and building rubble). A 0.3- to 2-foot fill horizon consisting
of slag, silt, sand and gravel is located directly beneath the solidified slag. A 1.5- to 9.2-foot thick
clay layer exists below the slag and fill layer on Site and at most off-site locations, where tested. The
clay layer is continuous within the perimeter of the site, but not at all points sampled off-site. The
surface of the clay layer is relatively flat with typical reliefs of 1 to 2 feet. Coal tar, asphaltic
material, some small tar pockets, and tar-like odors were observed at 25 of the 74 borings taken during the
RI. These borings were primarily located in a south-southeast direction from the former foundations and
near the storm water drainage area. Tar was encountered near the center of the Site, directly west of the
drainage ditch and near the northern property boundary. Tar was identified at 16 of the 74 surface borings.
Asphaltic materials were primarily encountered in the central and western portions of the Site in the upper 2
feet of fill. Asphaltic materials were encountered in 8 of the 74 borings sampled.
v. ) Clay Layer
The first natural soil encountered on the Site and some off-site areas consists of a gray clay with brown
mottling. The mottling is typically interpreted as a result of bioturbation and anaerobic conditions. In
addition, root structures were occasionally observed within the clay. This clay layer was presumably
deposited in a wetland (e.g., swamp) along the Tuscarawas River flood plain. The clay layer acts as a
confining layer and ranges in thickness from 1.5 to 9.2 feet on Site and at most off-site locations.
The clay layer appears to act as an impermeable boundary to downward migration of coal tar product and
perched water. Three Shelby tube clay samples were collected by Reilly for laboratory determination of
hydraulic conductivity (permeability). Hydraulic conductivity values ranged from 1.4 x 10-7 to 6.0 x 10-9
cm/sec.
vi.) Ground Water
Ground water in the Dover area is utilized by rural, municipal and industrial consumers. Ground water at the
Site occurs in three separate aguifer systems: perched, regional and bedrock. The perched aguifer is
located above a clay layer. The saturated thickness averages 3 feet, but varies from as little as 6-inches
to as much as 6 feet. Well yields in the perched aguifer varied from non-productive to greater than 2
gallons per minute. The ground water flow in the perched aguifer is influenced by the elevation of the clay
layer. Ground water will flow from points of high elevation to low elevation due to gravity. The perched
water zone appears to be interconnected with the storm water drainage ditch. Typical horizontal hydraulic
gradients in the perched aguifer ranged from 6.84 x 10-3 to 1.58 x 10-2. This aguifer is not utilized for
water production.
The regional aguifer is divided into three "zones" for the purposes of discussion below: shallow, mid-depth
and deep. The zone designated as shallow's anywhere from 19-51 feet below the ground surface; the mid-depth
zone extends from 52-180 feet, and the deep zone extends from 180-290 feet. The regional aguifer consists of
coarse, permeable, glaciofluvial sand and gravel sediments. The regional aguifer occurs in the paleo-river
channels and has a saturated thickness greater than 290 feet. In most areas, the regional aguifer is
hydraulically connected to the Tuscarawas River. The regional aguifer is widely used for municipal water
supplies for Dover and New Philadelphia and for numerous industrial production wells. Potentiometric ground
water levels in the regional aguifer indicate that flow is in an east-southeast direction toward the
Tuscarawas River. Closer to the river, the ground water flows in an easterly direction. Typical horizontal
hydraulic gradients in the deep and shallow regional aguifer ranged from 1.11 x 10-3 to 2.6 x 10-4 and 1.11 x
10-3 to 1.54 x 10-3, respectively.
Vertical hydraulic flow gradients indicate that there is a downward component of ground water flow in
selected monitoring well clusters. This suggests that the shallow portion of the aguifer is hydraulically
-------
interconnected to the Tuscarawas River (i.e., shallow ground water may discharge to the river), while the
mid-depth and deep portions of the aquifer may not be influenced by the Tuscarawas River.
The bedrock aguifer consists of sandstone, shale, and limestone seguences of the lower Pennsylvanian system
and/or sandstone and shale seguences of the Upper Mississippian system. Primary ground water flow in the
bedrock occurs within the pore space of the consolidated rock. Secondary ground water flow in the bedrock
generally occurs along bedding planes, joints and fractures.
vii.) Ecology
The following habitat types were identified at the Site and surrounding areas: river, riparian forest
(riverbank and drainage ditch), meadow, disturbed area (Site and off-site), wooded area, and industrial area.
According to information provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), there are no records of any state-listed or federally-listed threatened or endangered
species in the area. Although the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), a federally-listed endangered species,
occurs in Ohio, Tuscarawas County is outside of its range. The Ohio DNR Natural Heritage Program has no
records of threatened or endangered plant or animal species, nor of any nature preserves or unigue ecological
features in the vicinity of the study area.
B.) Nature and Extent of Contamination
Sampling and analysis was conducted in two phases for the RI. Subsurface soil, surface soil, surface water
and ground water samples were analyzed for target compound list ("TCL" - a common list of organic compounds)
constituents and subsurface soil and ground water samples were also analyzed for target analyte list ("TAL" -
a common list of metal compounds) constituents during Phase I (Figure 4). Analytical data from Round 1
ground water samples and Phase I soil and sediment samples were used to determine the contaminants of concern
("COG") that would be investigated during the Phase II program. COG are as follows:
Table 1: Contaminants of Concern
VOLATILES METALS SEMIVOLATILES
benzene arsenic phenol
toluene barium naphthalene
ethylbenzene chromium PAH compounds
xylenes lead 2-methylphenol
styrene 3 + 4-methylphenol
Additionally, Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure ("TCLP" - a procedure that replaced the EP toxicity
test) analyses were performed on tar and asphalt samples and TAL metals analyses were performed on slag
samples.
Seven different media were sampled and analyzed. The media include:
! surface soils,
! subsurface soils,
! surface water,
! sediments,
! slag
! groundwater
! tar and asphalt.
-------
i.) Surface Soils
31 samples were collected from a sample depth of 2 to 3 feet below ground surface and analyzed for TCL
volatiles and semivolatiles. Two additional samples were collected for BTEX, styrene, PAH, phenolics, and
naphthalene analys e s.
Volatiles
The following volatiles were detected in the surface soil samples: benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, styrene,
and xylene.
Benzene was detected at four of the 31 sample locations analyzed at concentrations ranging from 0.018 mg/kg
to 18.0 mg/kg. Toluene was detected in eight sample locations at concentrations ranging from 0.003 to 46.0
mg/kg. Ethylbenzene was detected in six surface soil sample locations with concentrations ranging from 0.037
to 13.0 mg/kg. Styrene was detected in five soil sample locations and ranged in concentration from 0.031 to
23.0 mg/kg. Xylene was detected in seven sample locations and ranged in concentration from 0.006 to 110
mg/kg. Samples collected directly southwest of the drainage ditch contained elevated concentrations of BTEX.
These samples were saturated with water, very odorous, and exhibited a hydrocarbon sheen.
Semivolatiles
Semivolatile compounds were generally detected across the Site in all surface soil samples. The distribution
of semivolatile organic compounds is summarized into four separate groups: total non-carcinogenic polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons ("TNP"), total carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ("TCP"), phenolics and
naphthalene. TNP compounds include acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, anthracene, fluoranthene, fluorene,
phenanthrene, pyrene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene. TCP compounds include: benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene,
benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3,c,d)pyrene, and
dibenz(a,h)anthracene. Phenolics include phenol, 2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol and 2, 4-dimethylphenol.
TNP concentrations ranged from a low of 0.681 mg/kg to a high of 7,763 mg/kg. TCP concentrations in surface
soil samples ranged from a low of 0.32 mg/kg to a high of 3,310 mg/kg in. Phenolics were detected in only
one sample at a concentration of 0.71 mg/kg. Naphthalene was detected all but two of the 31 surface soil
sample analyzed. Naphthalene concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 2,300 mg/kg.
In summary, relatively high levels (greater than 100 mg/kg) of TNP and TCP were detected in surface soils
primarily in the center of the Site and west of the storm water drainage ditch. Naphthalene was also detected
in the same areas. Phenolics were only detected in one surface soil sample. These analytical results
support the field observations of coal tar, sheens or odors in the surface soil samples.
ii.) Subsurface Soils
Twenty-two subsurface soil samples were collected from borings and analyzed for volatiles, semivolatile, and
metals. Only the natural materials, i.e., the clay, and sand and gravel units were sampled.
Volatiles
Benzene, toluene, styrene, xylene and ethylbenzene were detected in the subsurface soils.
Benzene was detected in only two samples at concentrations of 0.003 and 0.055 mg/kg. Toluene, styrene, and
ethylbenzene were detected in one sample at concentrations of 0.056, 0.032, and 0.028 mg/kg, respectively.
Xylene was detected in three samples at 0.004 mg/kg, 0.014 mg/kg, and 0.210 mg/kg. BTEX, present in low
concentrations in coal tar, were only found in samples from three borings, two on-site borings and one boring
off-site (RI-5S), which is located adjacent to the southern Site boundary.
-------
Semivolatiles
TNP were found in the majority of subsurface samples, as described above. However, concentrations were
relatively low compared to surface soil concentrations. The highest concentration of TNP was detected in a
sample adjacent to the Site's southern property boundary, and at a depth of 24 to 26 feet. This sample was
taken from the bottom of the clay. TNP were not detected in samples collected near bedrock.
The highest concentration of TCP (12.9 mg/kg) was detected at RI-5S at the 24- to 26-foot depth. The
remainder of TCP concentrations were less than 5 mg/kg. Phenolics were only found in two borings, with the
24- to 26-foot depth sample in RI-5S again showing the highest concentration (18.8 mg/kg). Naphthalene was
present in several samples, but at relatively low concentrations compared with concentrations found in the
surface soils.
In summary, semivolatiles were detected in subsurface soils on the top of the clay, at the bottom of the clay
and in the sand and gravel. However, the highest concentrations were found in the clay. Semivolatiles were
also detected in the upgradient off-site boring MWRI-1S. Please note that free coal tar was not sampled.
Inorganics (TAL Metals and Cyanide)
Twenty four subsurface soils collected during Phase I sampling were analyzed for 23 TAL Metals and cyanide.
Antimony, cadmium, mercury, silver, thallium and cyanide were not detected in any subsurface soil samples
above method guantitation limits. Selenium was detected in two samples (RI-2S-8 and RI-2S-10) at
concentrations of 1.8 and 1.1 mg/kg, respectively. Based on these findings, these metals are not considered
constituents of interest at the Site.
iii.) Surface Waters
Three surface water samples were collected from the drainage ditch; i.e., upstream (RI-SW-1), midpoint
(RI-SW-2), and downstream (RI-SW-3) locations. Samples were analyzed for TCL volatiles and semivolatiles.
Volatile organics were not detected above guantitation limits in the three surface water samples. Two
semivolatile compounds were detected 1,2-dichlorobenzene was detected in RI-SW-3 at a concentration of 0.001
mg/1 and in RI-SW-3D (duplicate) at a concentration of 0.002 mg/1. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected
in each surface water sample. Concentrations ranged from 0.019 mg/1 in RI-SW-1 to 0.003 mg/1 in RI-SW-2 and
RI- SW-3. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phalate is a common laboratory contaminant.
iv.) Sediments
Four sediment samples and one duplicate were collected from the storm water drainage ditch. Three sediment
samples were also collected along the western bank of the Tuscarawas River.
Storm Water Drainage Ditch
Volatiles were not detected in the upstream sediment sample or the midstream sample. Benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, xylenes and styrene were detected in the three downstream sediment samples. This finding
correlates well with the observance of tar-like material in the downstream drainage ditch sediments.
Semivolatile organic compounds were detected in each of the storm water drainage ditch sediment samples.
TNP compounds were detected in each of the drainage ditch sediment samples. TNP concentrations ranged from
9.2 mg/kg to 3,650 mg/kg. TCP compounds were also detected in each of the sediment samples and ranged in
concentrations from 7.7 mg/kg to 1,062 mg/kg. Phenolics were detected in only one downstream sample at a
concentration of 241 mg/kg. Naphthalene was detected in three of the four sediment sample locations and
ranged from 3.0 mg/kg to 2,600 mg/kg.
In summary, the finding of BTEX in the downstream drainage ditch sediment samples correlates well with the
observance of tar-like material at these locations. Semivolatiles were found in both upstream and downstream
locations. This suggests that a component of the semivolatiles is entering the drainage ditch from storm
water sources within the City of Dover.
-------
Tuscarawas River Sediments
Two samples were collected adjacent to the storm water culvert pipe discharge location. One sample showed
BTEX to be present, while the second sample showed no BTEX present. Volatiles were not present upstream nor
downstream of this location. Semivolatiles were found both upstream and near the culvert pipe discharge
location. These data, coupled with physical observations of tar-like material in the samples near the
culvert pipe discharge, suggest the storm water drainage ditch may be a route of migration of coal tar from
the drainage ditch to the river. TNP concentrations ranged from 3.98 to 591 mg/kg and TCP concentrations
ranged from 3.15 to 311.4 mg/kg. Phenolics were not detected in the river sediment samples and naphthalene
was detected at one location at 3.1 mg/kg.
v. ) Slag
Three slag samples were collected and analyzed to characterize the metals content of slag. The locations
were selected to provide representative coverage across the Site. These samples were free of visible tar or
asphaltic material, did not contain any loose fill materials typically observed above and below the slag, and
were considered representative of the undisturbed slag material.
The following metals were not detected in the slag above guantitation limits: antimony, cadmium, copper,
mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and thallium. Cyanide was also not detected above guantitation limits in
each slag sample. Aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and sodium were detected at
relatively high concentrations. Barium was also detected at concentrations ranging from 193 mg/kg to 1,250
mg/kg.
vi.) Ground Water
Monitoring wells installed in conjunction with the Phase I RI were sampled and analyzed during the first
round for TCL volatiles, semivolatiles, pesticides and PCBS, and TAL metals (dissolved and total). The
results of Sampling Round I demonstrated that pesticides, PCBS, and metals, except lead, chromium, arsenic
and barium, could be excluded from Sampling Round 2 analyses. Additionally, each monitoring well sampled
during Round 2 was analyzed for low level (ng/1 or parts per trillion) PAH. The analyses performed during
Sampling Round 3 were revised and reduced based on the results of Round 1 and Round 2 data. The revised list
included BTEX, styrene, PAH, phenolics, arsenic, barium, chromium and lead. Deep, mid-depth and off-site
shallow wells were also analyzed for low level PAH compounds.
a.) Volatile Organics Characterization
Perched Aguifer
Ground water samples were collected and analyzed from four of seven perched monitoring wells. In accordance
with the approved Phase II Work Plan, three perched wells (MWRI-3P, -7P, and - 12P), which underlie the site,
were not sampled, as coal tar was visible in each well.
BTEX were detected in three of the four wells (MWRI-8P, IIP, and -BW) . Perched well -8P is located south and
MWRI-11P and -BW are located to the north of the Site. Based on ground water flow direction projected for
the perched water aguifer beneath the Site, it is possible that perched water from the Site is moving out
radially in the direction of all three wells (Figure 7).
Benzene concentrations ranged from 0.082-0.68 mg/1, toluene ranged from 0.005-0.63 mg/1, ethylbenzene ranged
from 0.02-0-15 mg/1, and xylene from 0.22-0.63 mg/1.
Shallow Regional Aguifer
BTEX and styrene were detected in five of eleven shallow monitoring wells (Table 2).
Table 2: VOC Concentrations in Shallow Monitoring Wells (mg/1)
-------
Compound
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene
Ethyl Benzene
Styrene
0
0
0
0
0.
MWRI-
.28-0.
.031-0
.07-0.
.016-0
0007-0
3S
78
.28
35
.05
.091
MWRI-
0.002-0
0.006-0
0.006-0
0.01-0.
0.003-0
4S
.014
.013
.066
034
.006
MWRI-5S
0.21-0.
0.044-0.
0.066-0.
0.016-0.
0.004-0.
,39
,13
,086
,033
,005
MWRI-6S
0.014-0.032
0.003
0.01-0.022
0.013-0.015
ND
MWRI-11S
0
0
0
0
.076
.02
.034
.01
ND
MCLs
0.005
1.0
10
0.7
0.1
The above results show that BTEX and styrene were found in on-site shallow monitoring wells (MWRI-3S, -4S and
-6S). These compounds were also found in the off-site downgradient well MWRI-5S, however, this well is in
close proximity to the Site's southern property boundary and is thus considered representative of Site
conditions. No other downgradient monitoring well contained BTEX or styrene, suggesting that these compounds
are primarily contained within the Site boundary. BTEX was also found in the upgradient shallow well
(MWRI-11S). Of these compounds, only benzene exceeded maximum contaminant levels ("MCLS"). Downgradient
shallow wells were free of BTEX compounds.
Mid-Depth Regional Aquifer
Toluene was detected in mid-depth monitoring wells located on-site. Toluene ranged from 0.002 to 0.017 mg/1.
Toluene was not detected off-site nor adjacent to the Tuscarawas River. The results show toluene is present
on-site at mid-depth in the regional aguifer, but at relatively low concentrations, well beneath MCLS or
action levels.
Deep Regional Aguifer
Toluene was detected during Sampling Round 1 at low levels on-site, In MWRI-3D (0.01 mg/1) and MWRI-7D (0.008
mg/1). Toluene was not detected in the upgradient, deep well (MWRI- 11D) nor the two downgradient deep wells
(MWRI-8D and -9D).
b.) Semivolatile Organics Characterization
Perched Aguifer
Semivolatiles were detected in each of the four perched wells sampled. The following concentrations of TNP,
TCP, phenolics and naphthalene were detected (Table 3):
Table 3: Semivolatiles in Perched Aguifer (mg/1)
Well Number TNP
MWRI-8P
MWRI-11P
MWRI-BW
MWRI-14P
0.52
2.248
0.105
0.031
TCP
BDL (a)
0.344
BDL
0.002
PHENOLICS
1.
0.
,09
,128
BDL
0.
,052
NAPHTHALENE
5.
9.
0.
0.
,3
,3
,18
,009
(a) BDL - below detection level
Semivolatiles were found in all of the perched wells (since coal tar was observed in on-site perched wells,
it is assumed Semivolatiles are present). A perched well north of the Site (MWRI- IIP) contained the highest
concentrations of TNP and TCP. This is likely the result of coal tar being present above the clay. However,
-------
the other well north of the Site (MWRI-BW) contained no TCP or phenolics. The visible extent of coal tar in
the perched aquifer is shown in Figure A.
Shallow Regional Aguifer
Semivolatiles were detected in all shallow wells, except the downgradient well located adjacent to the river
and the lateral gradient wells. TNP were detected in seven monitoring wells at the following concentration
ranges: MWRI-1S (0.005 mg/1) , MWRI-3S (0.232 to 0.572 mg/1), MWRI-4S (0.195 to 0.346 mg/1), MWRI-5S (0.001
to 0.046 mg/1), MWRI-6S (0.257 to 0.892 mg/1), MWRI-8S (0.057 mg/1), and MWRI-11S (0.098 mg/1).
TCP were detected in three of the 11 monitoring wells using standard CLP methods. However, highly sensitive
parts per trillion ("ppt") analyses showed TCP to be present in eight of the shallow monitoring wells. TCP
was not detected in downgradient well MWRI-9S and lateral wells MWRI-10S and -13S. TCP were detected in the
following shallow monitoring wells using CLP and ppt analytical methods.
Table 4: Low Level TCP in Shallow Monitoring Wells (ppt)
WELL NUMBER CLP METHOD LOW LEVEL PPT METHOD
MWRI-1S BDL (a) 1,877 and 380 ng/1
MWRI-2S BDL 5400 ng/1
MWRI-3S 0.009 mg/1 12,390 ng/1
MWRI-4S 0.008 to 0.06 mg/1 45,500 ng/1
MWRI-5S BDL 1,945 ng/1
MWRI-6S BDL to 0.078 mg/1 38,800 ng/1
MWRI-8S BDL 6,680 ng/1
MWRI-11S BDL 20,410 ng/1
(a) BDL - below detection level.
Phenolics were detected in 2 of the 11 shallow monitoring wells (MWRI-3S an MWRI-5S) at concentrations of
0.205 to 2.06 mg/1 respectively. Naphthalene was detected in 6 of the 11 shallow monitoring wells at the
following concentrations: MWRI-1S (0.004 mg/1), MWRI-3S (1.1 to 5.6 mg/1), MWRI-5S (0.002 to 0.11 mg/1),
MWRI-6S (0.002 to 0.17 mg/1), MWRI-8S (0.01 mg/1), and MWRI-11S (0.011 mg/1).
In summary, semivolatile organics were generally detected in on-site shallow wells. TNP and naphthalene were
detected in the downgradient well (MWRI-8S) but not in MWRI-9S located adjacent to the Tuscarawas River. TNP
and naphthalene concentrations in MWRI-8S are similar to concentrations detected in on-site wells. In
addition, TNP and naphthalene were also detected in the upgradient well (MWRI-11S) at similar concentrations
detected in on-site monitoring wells.
TCP were detected in all monitoring wells using ppt analyses, except for MWRI-10S and MWRI- 13S (lateral
monitoring wells) and MWRI-9S (downgradient monitoring well). TCP concentrations in the upgradient well
(MWRI-11S) were similar to concentrations in the on-site wells. TCP compounds were also detected in
downgradient well MWRI-8S, however, concentrations were higher than two of the five on-site monitoring wells.
Mid-Depth Regional Aguifer
Phenolics and naphthalene were the only semivolatiles detected using CLP procedures in the two on-site
mid-depth monitoring wells and only during one sampling round. Phenolics were detected once in each of the
-------
on-site mid-depth wells, 0.002 mg/1 in MWRI-3MD and 0.005 mg/1 in MWRI- 7MD. Naphthalene was only detected
during Sampling Round 1 in MWRI-7MD at 0.004 mg/1.
Semivolatile organics were not detected in downgradient well MWRI-9MD. TCP and TNP were not detected in
on-site wells MWRI-3MD, MWRI-7MD.
TNP and TCP were not detected using standard CLP, however, TCP compounds were detected using ppt procedures.
TCP were detected in each of the three mid-depth monitoring wells using ppt analytical methods. The
concentrations of TCP compounds during Sampling Round 3 ranged from 125 to 193 ng/1.
Deep Regional Aguifer
TCP and TNP were not detected in the deep monitoring wells using standard CLP procedures, however, TCP were
detected in all deep wells using ppt procedures. TCP concentrations ranged from 42 to 74 ng/1. Phenolics
were detected in the off-site upgradient well (MWRI-11D) and the two off-site downgradient deep wells
(MWRI-8D and -9D). Concentrations ranged from 0.006 to 0.019 mg/1. Naphthalene was detected in only one
on-site deep well (MWRI-3D) at a concentration of 0.0008 mg/1.
c.) Pesticides and PCBS
Pesticides and PCBS were analyzed as part of Sampling Round 1. No PCBS were detected and only one pesticide
(Delta BHC) was found above guantitation limits. Based on these results, pesticides and PCBS were not COCs
and were removed from future rounds of sampling and analyses.
d.) Metals
Seventeen metals and cyanide were analyzed. Metals of interest include arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead;
their analytical results are discussed below.
Perched Aguifer
Total arsenic was not detected in any perched well sampled, while dissolved arsenic was only detected in one
perched well. Total and dissolved barium were detected in each of the three perched monitoring wells
sampled. Total chromium was detected in two perched wells and dissolved chromium was detected in only one
perched well. Total lead was detected in two perched wells while dissolved lead was not detected in these
perched wells.
Shallow Regional Aguifer
Arsenic was sporadically detected in shallow wells at concentrations less than the MCL of 0.050 mg/1. Barium
was consistently detected in the shallow monitoring wells. Barium concentrations were highest in the
laterally upgradient well (MWRI-1S) and downgradient well MWRI-8S. Total barium concentrations exceeded the
MCL (1.0 mg/1) in these same two wells. Total and dissolved barium concentrations were less than the MCL in
the on-site wells. Chromium was detected only twice, once in a total metals sample and once in a dissolved
metals sample. Additionally, the chromium concentrations in these samples were well below the MCL of 0.10
mg/1. Total lead was generally detected in similar concentrations in each shallow monitoring well and only
one sample contained concentrations of lead greater than the action level of 0.015 mg/1. In addition,
dissolved lead was detected in two of the 11 shallow wells and at concentrations well below the action level.
Mid-depth Regional Aguifer
Arsenic and chromium were not detected in mid-depth wells, while barium and lead were detected, but well
below MCLS and action levels.
-------
Deep Regional Aquifer
Arsenic was not detected in any on-site or off-site deep wells. Barium was detected in both on-site and
off-site wells, and chromium and lead were only detected in on-site wells. In general, concentrations of
barium, chromium and lead are similar in each deep well. The concentrations are less than their respective
MCLs and action levels, except for one lead analysis from MWRI-3D. Subsequent analyses of MWRI-3D did not
detect lead above the action level.
e.) Tar and Asphalt
Nine tar and asphaltic material samples were collected during the RI investigation for chemical
characterization by TCLP. Three subsurface tar samples failed TCLP for benzene. The tar sample in each of
these samples was collected directly above the clay layer. The remaining six samples passed the TCLP.
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS
A. ) Human Health Risk Assessment
A human health risk assessment was performed by Reilly Industries, per Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund, Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part A). This assessment follows the standard steps of
identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern ("CPCs:), exposure assessment, toxicity assessment, and risk
characterization.
i.) Identification of Chemicals of Potential Concern:
This step of the risk assessment process involves reviewing the chemicals detected in various media sampled
during the RI, and identifying the most toxic, prevalent, mobile, and/or persistent chemicals. Based on this
analysis, the CPCs are selected for inclusion in the remainder of the risk assessment. CPCs include the
following:
! VOC
• benzene
• ethylbenzene
• styrene
• toluene
• xylene (total)
! SVOC
• benzoic acid
• bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
• dibenzofuran
• 2,4-dimethylphenol
• 2-methylphenol
• 4-methylphenol
• -phenol
! PAH
Of the CPCs listed above, PAH and BTEX are the primary constituents which present risk to human health and
the environment at the Site. In order to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of remediation options,
it is important to understand the properties of these compounds and how they behave in the environment. The
following is a brief description of these compounds, their fate in the environment, and their physical
properties.
PAH
PAH are a group of organic compounds consisting of two or more rings each made up of six carbon atoms. Each
-------
of these rings is termed aromatic because of the nature of the bonds holding the ring together. These bonds
affect the phyBiochemical properties of the rings and the resulting molecule. The number of rings affects
the properties of the molecule. For example, the two-ring molecule naphthalene is relatively water soluble
(32 mg/1) and adheres weakly to soils while the 5-ring benzo(a)pyrene is very insoluble (0.0038 mg/1) and
adheres strongly to solids. The PAH of primary toxicologic concern are large with four or five rings. In
general, all PAH are characterized by the following physiochemical properties:
! Poor chemical reactivity: under normal environmental conditions, these PAH are resistant to
chemical breakdown.
! Biodegradation by microorganisms: under typical conditions biodegradation rates may be
increased by supplying nutrients and/or introducing organisms that are adapted to degrading
PAR.
! Slow rates of volatilization to the atmosphere.
! Moderate to high rates of phyotolysis: if these PAHs are exposed to sunlight, they will
degrade.
! Poor water solubility.
! High degree of sorption to solids.
! High retardation rates in ground water.
Typically, a few processes control the fate and transport of a chemical in the environment. While photolysis
has the potential to rapidly degrade PAH, this reaction is limited by the lack of light penetration into the
soil. In soil and ground water environments, the processes of sorption to solids and biodegradation are
likely to dominate the fate and transport of PAH. Thus, PAH are likely to move very slowly through
subsurface soils above and below the water table. The rate of movement in the saturated zone is likely to be
10 to 20,000 times slower than the rate of water movement. The most significant means of degrading PAH,
in-situ, is likely to be by biological means. The rate of biodegradation can vary dramatically depending
upon the number and type of microorganisms present, the concentration of PAH, and the availability of
nutrients. Unless biodegradation is encouraged (for example, by adding nutrients), the PAH are likely to
persist in the soil for long periods of time.
As mentioned above, each of the PAH of concern has a distinct set of chemical and physical properties. The
two fate and transport processes that are likely to be of importance at the Site, biodegradation and
sorption, will vary in rate according to the size of the PAH molecule. The relative ability of the PAH of
interest to adsorb to solids is as follows:
Naphthalene < Anthracene < Benzo(a)anthracene = Chrysene < dibenzo(a,h)anthracene < Benzo(a)pyrene <
Benzo(b)fluoranthene < Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene.
The relative rate of biodegradation is likely to follow the opposite order of sorption. This is due to the
fact that, in general, more complex molecules are degraded more slowly and more likely to adsorb to solids,
and compounds that adsorb well to solids are less available to microorganisms for degradation.
BTEX Compound
BTEX compounds are the principle VOCs which were detected at the Site. Due to their volatility, the
transport of BTEX through the air-filled pores of unsaturated soils is an important transport mechanism for
near-surface soils. The rate of volatilization from soil is influenced by soil porosity, soil moisture,
temperature, convection currents, and barometric pressure changes. Their behavior and fate in the environment
is described as follows:
! poor chemical reactivity under normal environmental conditions;
-------
! potential for degradation by microorganisms;
! potential to volatilize to the atmosphere;
! poor sorption to soils; and
! soluble in water.
The primary BTEX constituent of interest on-site, with respect to risk, is benzene. Benzene, C6H6, is a
volatile, colorless, and flammable liguid aromatic hydrocarbon which possesses a characteristic odor. Its
structure is such that all of the carbon and hydrogen atoms are coplanar and all of the six carbon-to-carbon
bonds are identical. Due to its volatility, the transport of benzene through the air-filled pores of
unsaturated soils is an important transport mechanism for near-surface soils. The rate of volatilization
from soil is influenced by soil porosity, soil moisture, temperature, convection currents, and barometric
pressure changes. For ground water, however, volatilization into soil pore spaces is not likely to be a
significant transport mechanism for removal of benzene. This is due to relatively slow movement by diffusion
of vapor phase benzene through the unsaturated zone. The Henry's Law Constant for benzene (5.5 x 10-3 atm-m
3/mol) indicates that benzene, upon reaching surface water via ground water discharge, is likely to
volatilize from the surface water body. Benzene would transfer readily from the agueous phase to the vapor
phase by air stripping.
Benzene is weakly adsorbed by soils and is likely to be mobile in ground water. However, based on benzene's
retardation factor, it would still be likely to migrate more slowly than ground water at the Site. Under
normal environmental conditions, benzene is not expected to undergo hydrolysis, oxidation or reduction
reactions in the soil/ground water environment. However, numerous studies have shown biodegradation to be
effective in removing benzene from ground water. Benzene would be degraded to carbon dioxide and water.
ii.) Exposure Assessment
The objective of the exposure assessment is to evaluate the magnitude and freguency of potential exposure to
CPCs. Potential human receptors are identified based on characteristics of the Site and surrounding area.
Potential routes of exposure to Site-related CPCs are identified and the extent of a receptor's exposure by
this route is estimated. While these scenarios represent hypothetical people and activities, hey reflect
the physical description of the Site and the surrounding industrial and residential areas as well as the
activities that typically occur in these areas.
The receptors evaluated include an on-site resident, an on-site worker, a Construction worker, a trespassing
teenager, and an off-site resident. Although the Site is currently zoned for industrial use and is owned by
a construction company, it is possible that sometime in the future the Site may be developed for residential
use. Therefore, as a health protective measure, an on-site resident was included in the risk assessment.
Potential exposure pathways ("PEPs") are the routes by which potential receptors may be exposed to CPCs.
Direct exposure pathways are those in which the potential human receptor comes in direct contact with a CPC
in an environmental medium such as air, water, or soil. Indirect exposure pathways involve exposure to CPCs
through the food chain. The following direct and indirect exposure pathways were included in the risk
assessment.
! Inhalation of soil as dust and vapors;
! Dermal contact and incidental ingestion of soils;
! Dermal contact and incidental ingestion of surface water;
! Dermal contact and incidental ingestion of sediment;
! Groundwater exposure (inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact); and
! Ingestion of fish.
In accordance with EPA guidance a reasonable maximum exposure ("RME") scenario was performed in this risk
assessment.
-------
iii.) Risk Characterization
In the risk characterization the results of the exposure assessment are combined with the results of the
toxicity assessment to derive pathway-specific quantitative estimates of potential health risks. The
estimates for each exposure pathway are then summed to give total risk estimates for the Site. Separate
quantitative estimates of potential risk are derived for carcinoqenic effects and for noncarcinoqenic
effects. Results are presented in Table 5 below.
Table 5: Summary of Site Risks
Exposure Scenario Non-Carcinoqenic Risk Carcinoqenic Risk
On-site Resident 2.87 1.3 x 10E-3
Trespassinq Teenaqer 0.092 1.25 x 10E-4
Off-site Resident 0.00065 2.4 x 10E-7
On-site Worker 0.4416 6.5 x 10E-4
Construction Worker 0.064 9.6 x 10E-6
The total carcinoqenic risk for the on-site resident is 1.3 x 10-3, well above the threshold acceptable risk
ranqe of 10-6- 10-4. Approximately 91 percent of this risk estimate (4.0 x 10-4) is associated with
inqestion of and dermal contact with carcinoqenic PAH in surface soil. The total RME noncarcinoqenic hazard
index associated with this scenario is 2.87, indicatinq that there are unacceptably hiqh toxic health effects
from contamination on-site to a theoretical resident. Approximately 86 percent of the potential
noncarcinoqenic hazard index is associated with exposure to the methylphenols in the qroundwater.
The total carcinoqenic risk for an on-site worker is 6.5 x 10-4, also above the threshold risk ranqe. The
non-carcinoqenic risk to an on-site worker is below 1.0. Exposure to surface soil by the trespassinq
teenaqer poses a risk estimated to be 1.25 x 10-4, 94 percent of which is associated with exposure to
carcinoqenic PAH in surface soil.
Total potential carcinoqenic risk to the construction worker is below 1 x 10-4 and risks to an off-site
resident livinq across the Tuscarawas River east of the Site is below 1 x 10-6. The total hazard indices for
an off-site resident livinq east of the Tuscarawas River, the trespassinq teenaqer, and the construction
worker are below 1, which indicates that no potential noncarcinoqenic health effects associated with these
exposure scenarios are expected to occur.
B.) Ecoloqical Risk Assessment
In accordance with The Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Environmental Evaluation Manual (OSWER
Directive 9285.7-01, March 1989), a baseline ecoloqical risk assessment was conducted to qualitatively and
quantitatively evaluate the potential for adverse ecoloqical effects to occur due to the presence of
Site-related chemicals in the environment. The habitats and indiqenous species present on the Site and
surroundinq areas were identified durinq two Site visits conducted in April and July of 1992. Accordinq to
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, there are no threatened or
endanqered species in this area.
The potential ecoloqical exposure pathways included the inqestion of and/or direct contact with CPCs in the
surface water and sediments of the Tuscarawas River and the drainaqe ditch, and the inqestion of and/or
direct contact with CPCs in soils both on and off the Site. The food chain exposure pathway, i.e., the
inqestion of orqanisms and plants containinq Site-related chemicals, was also assessed.
Information on the habitats, CPCs, and potential exposure pathways were evaluated to develop a conceptual
Site model for the risk assessment. The key species and habitats, those most likely to be exposed to
-------
Site-related chemicals, were identified for analysis. The habitats included the Tuscarawas River, the
drainage ditch, and the Site. Aquatic and benthic species were evaluated as representatives of the surface
water and sediment environments of the Tuscarawas River and the drainage ditch, and the cottontail rabbit was
assessed as a representative of the terrestrial environment. Screening assessments were conducted on the
surface water, sediment, and terrestrial habitats.
The results of the terrestrial screening assessment indicate that cottontail rabbits are not likely to
experience adverse effects from exposure to CPCs in the surface water and sediments of the drainage ditch,
and in on-site soils and vegetation. Extrapolating from the results of the cottontail rabbit analysis, based
on the chemical properties of the CPCs and the limited terrestrial potential exposure pathways, the potential
for adverse effects on terrestrial species in the area of the Site is likely to be minimal.
The results of the aquatic screening assessment were inconclusive. While acute and chronic toxicity effects
are not likely to occur to aquatic species residing in the Tuscarawas River, surface water concentrations of
CPCs may exceed chronic toxicity levels in the drainage ditch. Moreover, the results of the sediment
screening assessment indicate that chronic toxicity effects are likely to occur to benthic species in the
Tuscarawas River sediments in the vicinity of the drainage ditch outfall. Sediment concentrations of CPCs
may exceed toxicity levels in the drainage ditch.
Based on the conclusions of the aquatic, sediment, and terrestrial screening assessments, monitoring the
river appears to be warranted regarding the effects on contaminants in the surface water sediments in the
drainage ditch and in the outfall of the Tuscarawas river on aquatic species.
VII. DESCRIPTION OF SITE-WIDE REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
The presence of coal tar CPC, particularly BTEX and PAH, in the soil, in free tar product on the surface, in
sediments and in groundwater present a risk to human health and a potential threat to the environment, as
stated above. Several Site-wide alternative cleanup methods were evaluated in the FS and in addenda to the
FS, which can be found in the Site repository and in the Administrative Record. These alternatives were
developed and evaluated on the basis of a number of criteria which are discussed below.
A.) Remedial Action Objectives and Cleanup Levels
Remedial action objectives ("RAO's") for each environmental media are developed in the FS, subsequent to the
RI and risk assessment. RAOs serve as the basis on which remedial response alternatives are designed. RAOs
must account for each pathway in which a risk or a potential risk to human health or the environment exists.
Cleanup levels in each media are also determined in the FS. Cleanup levels are derived from within the
acceptable residual carcinogenic risk range of 10-6 - 10-4, based in part on future land use and other
criteria such as practicability. For this Site, cleanup levels were derived based on a residual carcinogenic
risk level of approximately 1.0 x 10-5, in an industrial future use scenario. Non-carcinogenic risks in the
industrial use scenario were beneath the threshold hazard quotient of 1.0, and therefore are not of concern.
The following RAOs were developed for the Site:
! Prevent worker exposure to CPC in the surface soil, tarry materials and sediments which pose an excess
cancer risk of approximately 10-5 or greater;
! Prevent worker exposure to CPC in the sub-surface soil which pose an excess cancer risk of
approximately 10-5 or greater;
! Prevent exposure to CPC in the perched aquifer above MCLs;
! Prevent exposure to CPC in the regional aquifer above MCLs;
! Prevent migration of CPC in surface and subsurface soils, and tarry materials to the regional aquifer;
! Prevent migration of CPC in sediments that would result in exceedences in ambient water quality
-------
criteria in the Tuscarawas River;
! Prevent migration of CPC in the perched aquifer migrating to the drainage ditch or the regional
aquifer;
! Prevent migration of CPC in the regional aquifer.
B.) Applicable or Appropriate and Relevant Requirements
CERCLA Section 121(d) requires that remedial actions take into consideration the requirements of all federal
and state environmental regulations. Those pertinent regulations are referred to as applicable or relevant
and appropriate requirements ("ARARs").
Applicable requirements are standards, standards of control, and other substantive environmental protection
requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under federal or state law that specifically address a
hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, remedial action, or other circumstance at a CERCLA Site.
Relevant and appropriate requirements are standards, standards of control, and other substantive
environmental protection requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under federal or state law that,
while not applicable to a hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, remedial action, or other
circumstances at a CERCLA Site, are well suited for use at the CERCLA Site because they address problems or
situations sufficiently similar. In some circumstances, a requirement may be relevant to the particular
Site-specific situation but will not be appropriate because of differences in the purpose of the requirement,
the duration of the regulated activity, or the physical size or characteristic of the situation it is
intended to address. Only those requirements that are determined to be both relevant and appropriate must be
complied with.
A requirement that is judged to be relevant and appropriate must be complied with to the same degree as if it
were applicable. Relevant and appropriate requirements that are more stringent than applicable requirements
take precedence. There is more discretion in the determination of relevant and appropriate requirements than
in the determination of applicable requirements. It is possible for only a part of a requirement to be
relevant and appropriate.
In addition to the legally binding requirements established as ARARs, many federal and state programs have
developed criteria, advisories, guidelines, or proposed standards that may provide useful information or
recommend procedures if no ARARs address a particular situation or if existing ARARs do not provide
protection. In such situations, these "to be considered" ("TBC") criteria or guidelines should be used to
set remedial action levels. Examples of criteria to be considered are reference doses ("RFD") and slope
factors for ingestion of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic compounds, respectively, for the risk assessment.
The potential ARARs for the Site were developed based on the July 29, 1994 letter from U.S. EPA Region 5 to
Mr. James Bratina of Reilly Industries, transmitting a listing of potential ARARs. ARARs were then
identified based on the specific characteristics of the Site, constituents of interest identified in soil and
ground water, and potential alternatives available to remediate those constituents. The applicability of
each of the potential ARARs listed in the July 29, 1994 letter was evaluated to assess the potential ability
of technologies to comply with ARARs.
CERCLA Section 121 (e) exempts any response action conducted entirely on Site from having to obtain federal,
state, or local permits. On-Site actions need to comply only with the substantive aspects of ARARs, and not
the corresponding administrative requirements. Therefore, permit applications and other administrative
reviews and reporting, and record keeping requirements are not considered ARARs for actions conducted
entirely on Site (USEPA 1988). Where a waiver from requirements set by an ARAR is needed to apply an
alternative, a description and justification for the waiver is discussed in the detailed evaluation.
Based on the CERCLA statutory requirements, the remedial alternatives developed in this FS are analyzed for
compliance with federal and state ARARs. This process involves the initial determination of potential
requirements, the evaluation of the potential requirements for applicability or relevance and
-------
appropriateness, and finally, a determination of the ability of the remedial alternatives to achieve the
ARARs.
Three classifications or requirements are defined in the ARAR determination process and are summarized below:
! chemical-specific;
! location- specific; and
! action-specific.
Chemical-specific ARARs include those laws and regulations governing the release of materials possessing
certain chemical or physical characteristics, or containing specific chemical compounds. Examples include
drinking water standards, and ambient air quality standards. These requirements generally set health or
risk-based concentration limits or discharge limitations after treatment in various environmental media for
specific hazardous substances.
A Site's location is a fundamental determinant of its impact on human health and the environment.
Location-specific ARARs are restrictions placed on the concentration of hazardous substances or the conduct
of activities solely because they are in specific locations. Some examples of special locations include
flood plains, wetlands, historic places, and sensitive ecosystems or habitats. Action-specific ARARs are
usually technology- or activity-based requirements or limitations on actions taken with respect to hazardous
wastes. These requirements are triggered by the particular remedial activities that are selected to
accomplish a remedy. Since there are usually several alternative actions for any remedial Site, very
different requirements can come into play. These action-specific requirements are not the driving force in
determining the remedial alternative; rather, they indicate how a selected alternative must be achieved.
Potential Federal and State ARARs identified by U.S. EPA and OEPA for this Site are attached in Appendix A.
C.) Alternative Listing
The following alternatives evaluated in the FS and in addenda to the FS were presented to the Public through
the Proposed Plan/Public meeting in Dover, Ohio on January 22, 1997:
Alternative 1 - No Action
The inclusion of the no action alternative is required by law and gives U.S. EPA a basis for comparison.
This alternative will not reduce any potential public health or environmental risks currently associated with
the Site. This alternative does not include any institutional controls preventing the use of ground water or
surface water.
! Net Present Worth Cost: $0
Alternative 2 - Institutional controls, excavation and thermal treatment of surface water drainage ditch and
river sediments, surface soils and impacted perched zone material contaminated with greater than 100 ppm
B(a)P-TE, and off-site disposal of solidified tarry materials; excavation and on-site disposal of surface
water drainage ditch sediments, and surface soils contaminated with less than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE, and greater
than 5 ppm B(a)P-TE. Ohio RCRA Subtitle D Solid Waste Cap over on-site disposed materials. Soil cover over
remainder of the Site. Natural attenuation and long-term monitoring of shallow ground water. Sampling and
analysis of sediments in the river.
Under this alternative, the Site will continue to be zoned for industrial use only, a deed restriction will
be placed on-site banning all use of groundwater, and limiting disturbance of the land; impacted surface
water drainage ditch sediments and contaminated surficial soils above the 100 ppm contamination level for
B(a)P-TE - approximately 2480 cubic yards will be excavated and treated off-site in a cement kiln, impacted
surface water drainage ditch sediments and contaminated surficial soils between 5 ppm and 100 ppm B(a)P-TE -
approximately 5500 cubic yards, will be placed on-site within the building foundation and capped with an Ohio
RCRA Subtitle D Solid Waste Cap; tarry materials will be solidified and disposed off-site, or recycled reused
as fuel/feedstock; the remainder of the Site will be covered with soil and vegetated. Sediments in the river
-------
will be sampled and analyzed to further determine possible impacts on the river ecosystem.
Capital Cost: $1,257,000
30 yrs. Operation & Maintenance $ 965,000
Total Present Worth: $2,220,000
Alternative 3 - Institutional controls, excavation and thermal treatment of surface water drainage ditch
sediments, surface soils and impacted perched zone material contaminated with greater than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE,
and off-site disposal of solidified tarry materials or recycle/reuse of tarry materials as fuel or feedstock;
excavation and on-site disposal of surface water drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and
impacted perched zone soils, from collection trench excavation, contaminated with less than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE,
and greater than 5 ppm B(a)P-TE. Ohio RCRA Subtitle D Solid Waste Cap over on-site disposed materials. Soil
cover over remainder of the Site; hydraulic control and collection of perched ground water and natural
attenuation and long-term monitoring of shallow ground water. Sampling and analysis of sediments in the
river.
Under this alternative, all action items in alternative 2 will be implemented. In addition, a french drain
will be placed in the perched aguifer to maintain a hydraulic barrier to perched tarry materials and
groundwater migration off-site.
Capital: $1,379,100
O&M: $1,431,200
Present Worth $2,810,300
Alternative 4 - Institutional controls, excavation and off-site treatment of drainage ditch sediments,
surface soils and impacted perched zone soils from the collection trench installation, contaminated with
greater than 5 ppm B(a)P-TE; solidification and off-site disposal of tarry materials, or recycle/reuse of
tarry materials as fuel or feedstock; a soil cover over the Site; hydraulic control and collection of perched
ground water and natural attenuation and long-term monitoring of shallow ground water. Sampling and analysis
of sediments in the river.
Under this alternative, all excavated soils and sediments, approximately 8000 cubic yards, will be treated
off-site in a cement kiln, eliminating the need for a solid waste cap. Tarry materials will be solidified
prior to disposal. Other action items will be implemented as above.
Capital: $2,238,200
O&M: $1,431,200
Present Worth $3,669,400
VIII. SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
The NCP reguires that the alternatives be evaluated on the basis of the following nine evaluation criteria:
(1) Overall protection of human health and the environment; (2) Compliance with ARARs; (3) Long-term
effectiveness and permanence; (4) Reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment; (5)
Short-term effectiveness; (6) Implementability; (7) Cost; (8) State acceptance; and (9) Community acceptance.
This section compares the alternatives with regard to these nine evaluation criteria, which are further
defined below:
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment addresses whether or not the remedy provides adeguate
protection and describes how risks are eliminated, reduced or controlled through treatment, engineering
controls, or institutional controls.
Compliance with ARARs addresses whether or not the remedy will meet all of the applicable or relevant and
appropriate reguirements of other Federal and State environmental statutes and/or provide grounds for
invoking a waiver.
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence refers to the ability of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of
-------
human health and the environment over time once cleanup goals have been met.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment is the anticipated performance of the treatment
technologies a remedy may employ.
Short-term Effectiveness involves the period of time needed to achieve protection and any adverse impacts on
human health and the environment that may be posed during the construction and implementation period until
cleanup goals are achieved.
Implementability is the technical and administrative feasibility of a remedy, including the availability of
goods and services needed to implement the chosen solution.
Cost includes capital and operation and maintenance costs.
Support Agency Acceptance indicates whether, based on its review of the RI/FS and Proposed Plan, the support
agency concurs, opposes, or has no comment on the preferred alternative.
Community Acceptance addresses the public's comments on and concerns about the Proposed Plan and the FS
Report. The specific responses to public comments will be addressed in the Responsiveness Summary attached
to the Amended Record of Decision.
A.) Threshold Criteria: Overall Protection Of Human Health And The Environment and compliance With ARARs:
Alternative 1, the No Action Alternative, satisfies none of the RAOs above and obviously does not satisfy the
threshold criterion of overall protectiveness of human health and the environment. The risks to human health
and potential risks to the environment remain.
Alternative 2 satisfies some but not all of the RAOs and is not protective of human health or the
environment. Specifically, the CPC in the free phase coal tar, which resides in the perched zone, would
continue to migrate off-site unabated. The spread of coal tar CPC in the perched zone to the drainage ditch
and potentially to the regional aguifer present potential threats to human health and the environment.
Alternatives 3 and 4 both satisfy RAOs and protect of human health and the environment through treatment of
principal threats, and both meet ARARs as well. The remainder of this evaluation will be limited to
alternatives 3 and 4.
B.) Primary balancing Criteria: Long term effectiveness and permanence; Reduction in toxicity, mobility
and volume through treatment; Short term effectiveness, implementability; and cost.
Long term effectiveness and permanence are substantially, if not entirely satisfied by alternatives 3 and 4.
Both alternatives employ treatment of principal threats at the Site. Alternative 4 calls for the off-site
thermal treatment of all Site soils and sediments in excess of 5 ppm B(a)P- TE, whereas alternative 3 calls
for thermal destruction of soils and sediments which contain B(a)P-TE of 100 ppm or greater, and on-site
containment of lightly contaminated soils and sediments (B(a)P-TE < 100 ppm, and > 5 ppm). Each alternative
employs a drain to capture, pump and treat subsurface perched water with coal tar CPC in the perched zone.
A completely permanent remedy would entail excavation of any and all coal tar CPC on or underneath the Site.
This approach was screened out due to its impracticability. Alternatives 3 and 4 are effective in the long
term because surficial risks are effectively mitigated and underlying coal tar CPC are eventually drained out
of the perched zone and treated in the local POTW. Alternative 3 is not entirely permanent, because it
employs a containment component.
Alternative 4 fully satisfies the criteria to reduce toxicity, mobility and volume of CPC in soil and
sediment through treatment. Surficial coal tar is either thermally treated, stabilized or recycled.
Alternative 3 satisfies this criteria for the heavily contaminated soils and sediments, and for subsurface
coal tar CPC, but not for lightly contaminated soils and sediments.
-------
The short term effectiveness of alternatives 3 and 4 are approximately equal, the only difference being the
amount of soil removed off-site and the construction of an Ohio Solid Waste Cap. The time to haul three
times the amount of soil off-site in alternative 4 is off-set by the time to construct a cap. Risks posed
to construction workers during remedial action were calculated in the risk assessment and are below levels of
concern.
Both alternatives 3 and 4 are implementable. A cement kiln has been identified to receive the contaminated
soils. The civil engineering and construction requirements to build an on-site vault, and install the french
drain on-site are well understood and should pose no difficulty to design and remedial action. The net
present worth of alternative 3 is $2.8 million. The net present worth of alternative 4 is 30% higher, at
$3.67 million.
A cost-benefit analysis evaluates remedial response alternatives within the context of how completely each of
the balancing criteria above are satisfied against the total cost of each remedy. Between two remedies, a
cost benefit analysis identifies the incremental increase in benefit (based on the balancing criteria above
minus cost) and identifies a value for this against the actual incremental increase in cost associated with
that incremental benefit. A cost benefit analysis is not an analysis of cost versus protectiveness. Both
alternatives under consideration are fully protective of human health and the environment and meet ARARs.
In this case, alternative 4 presents the incremental benefit of removing 5500 cubic yards of lightly
contaminated soils and sediment from the Site, making an on-site vault unnecessary. The specific cost
benefit analysis question here is based on whether this benefit is worth the additional $850,000, which is
the approximate cost difference between the two alternatives.
USEPA considers it more cost effective to keep lightly contaminated soils contained on-site for two reasons.
First, from an environmental perspective, while lightly contaminated soils will remain on-site in a vault,
the principle CPC, B(a)P-TE, is virtually immobile, and the likelihood, of off Site migration or a long term
breach in the effectiveness of this remedy is very remote. Secondly, from an economic and development
perspective, this Site will be limited to commercial/industrial use, and well development will be prohibited.
Therefore, unrestricted use is not an option, making the removal of all surficially contaminated soils
off-site unnecessary. Each alternative will equally permit the development of the Site for industrial use.
Therefore, USEPA recommends alternative 3.
C.) Modifying Criteria: State Agency Acceptance and Community Acceptance
OEPA agrees that alternative 3 is the most cost effective remedy and supports its recommendation. A public
meeting was held on January 22, 1997 in Dover, Ohio to present the selected remedy. There were no public
comments during the meeting and no public comments were received subsequently, indicating that there is no
objection to this remedial alternative.
IX. SELECTED REMEDY
Alternative 3 is the selected remedy for this Site:
Institutional controls, excavation and off-site thermal treatment of drainage ditch and river sediments,
surface soils and impacted perched zone material from the collection trench installation contaminated with
greater than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE, and off-site disposal of solidified tarry materials, excavation and on-site
disposal of surface water drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and impacted perched zone
material contaminated with less than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE, and greater than 5 ppm B(a)P-TE; an Ohio RCRA Subtitle
D Solid Waste Cap over on-site disposed materials; a soil cover over the remainder of the Site; hydraulic
control and collection of perched ground water and natural attenuation and long-term monitoring of shallow
ground water. Sampling and analysis of sediments in the river.
The selected remedy is discussed in more detail below.
Institutional Controls
-------
Regional planning indicates that the area will continue to be zoned only for industrial use. Deed
restrictions will be placed on the affected property to prohibit Site disturbance and groundwater use. The
City of Dover passed Ordinance No. 34-96 which bans installing ground water wells for human consumption
throughout the City. Efforts are currently underway to ban all ground water use (i.e., industrial,
agricultural, irrigation) in the Site area. The Mayor of Dover has been receptive to banning all ground
water use in the Site area, and this proposal was presented to the Dover City Council on August 19, 1996.
The current owner of the Site and property south and west has agreed to place deed restrictions on these
properties to prohibit ground water use and limit disturbance of the land. The Site will continue to be
secured with chain-link fencing and a locked gate until the existing exposure risks at the Site have been
addressed.
Excavation and Off-site Thermal Treatment of Surface Water Drainage Ditch Sediments, Surface Soils and
Impacted Perched Zone Material with B(a)P-TE greater than 100 ppm
Surficial soils with B(a)P-TE greater than 100 ppm (approximately 2,730 cubic yards) will be excavated and
treated in an off-site cement kiln. Impacted surface water drainage ditch sediment (approximately 120 cubic
yards) will be excavated and treated in an off-site cement kiln. Impacted perched zone material from the
collection trench excavation will be treated in an off-site cement kiln. The trench will be backfilled with
high permeability fill and clean spoils from the excavation. The surface water ditch will be lined to
eliminate the hydraulic connection between the surface water and perched zone.
Excavation and On-site Disposal of Surface Water Drainage Ditch Sediments, Surface Soils, Impacted Perched
Zone Material with B(a)P-TE less than 100 ppm and Greater than 5 ppm
Surficial soils with B(a)P-TE less than 100 ppm and greater than 5 ppm (approximately 5500 cubic yards) will
be excavated and placed in the building foundation. The cracks in the floors and walls of the building
foundation will be sealed to ensure the integrity of the structure. The Site will be grubbed and graded.
Soil, concrete and/or slag removed to facilitate grading activities will be placed in the building
foundation. The building foundation will be capped with an Ohio Solid Waste Cap, pursuant to 40 CFR 261
(Subtitle D) and Ohio Administrative Code Section 3745-27-08, and the remainder of the Site will be covered
with soil and vegetated.
Off-site Disposal or Recycling of Tarry Materials
The tarry materials will be solidified with lime, cement and/or flyash and will be disposed off-site, or may
be recycled as a feedstock. To the extent that these materials are RCRA Characteristic Hazardous Waste,
off-site disposal must comply with Land Ban regulations pursuant to 40 CFR Section 268 Subpart D, and with U
S. EPA's off-site Rule, 58 Fed Reg 49200 (September 22, 1993), for disposal in an approved RCRA Subtitle C
landfill. Transportation and storage of these materials would need to comply with 40 CFR 262, and 263 as
well. It is estimated that a 20% volume increase would occur due to the solidification process.
The recycling option will depend largely on material handling issues and the ability to segregate coal tar
from the soils and sediments. To the extent that these materials are RCRA Characteristic Hazardous Waste,
recycling of these materials must comply with Ohio Administrative Code Section 3745-50-311 through
3745-50-315, which govern criteria by which recycling variances to classification as a waste are granted.
Hydraulic Control and Collection of Perched Ground Water
A horizontal trench will be installed within the saturated portion of the perched zone, on top of the
underlying clay to a depth of approximately 15 to 18 feet below the surface (approximately 863 feet MSL) to
recover perched ground water. The trench will be located in the central portion of the Site and will be
approximately 400 linear feet. The trench will be constructed to maximize drainage of perched contaminants
while maintaining the integrity of the perched clay zone. Top of clay topography will, for the most part,
determine the natural collection point of the trench where perched water will be pumped to an oil/water
separator and discharged to the sanitary sewer line that leads to the City of Dover POTW.
A permit will be obtained from the City of Dover to discharge the water recovered from the trench to the
-------
POTW. Discharge to the POTW must comply with the POTW pretreatment program, including POTW-specific
pollutants, pursuant to 40 CFR 403.5: Discharge to Publicly Owned Treatment Works. The permit will
establish appropriate pre-treatment limits pursuant to 40 CFR 403. Any waste to be discharged to the POTW
will, if necessary, be treated to satisfy the standards set forth in the permit, prior to discharge. The
discharge from the collection trench is expected to be approximately 2,900 to 7,200 gallons per day.
Natural Attenuation and Long-Term Monitoring of Shallow Ground Water
At the present time, no CPC present in the regional aguifer downgradient of the Site exceeds Safe Drinking
Water MCLS. CPC degradation and migration will be monitored in the shallow regional ground water to assess
the effectiveness of natural attenuation on an on-going basis. Monitoring wells will be in both upgradient
and downgradient locations around the Site to achieve these goals.
Sampling and Analysis of Tuscarawas River Sediments to Monitor Ecological Effects
Monitor river sediments in the outfall and immediately downstream for 3-5 years to ensure that there are no
risks to the aguatic ecosystem.
X. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
US EPA's selected alternative provides the best balance of tradeoffs among the alternatives with respect to
the criteria used to evaluate the remedies. Based on the information available at this time, U.S. EPA
believes the selected alternative will protect human health and the environment, will comply with ARARs, will
be cost-effective, and will utilize permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies to the maximum
extent practicable. The selected alternative also satisfies the preference for treatment as a principal
element.
-------
APPENDIX A
FEDERAL AND STATE APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS
-------
TABLE C-3
Federal Chemical-Specific Potential Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Chemical Name
NAAQS (a) (Clean Air Act)
Requirements
Carbon monoxide
Lead
Not to exceed 9 ppm over 8-hour period and not to exceed 35
ppm over a 1-hour period (primary); no secondary standards.
Not to exceed 1.5 Iq/m 3 based on a quarterly averaqe.
Nitroqen dioxide Not to exceed 0.053 ppm annually.
Particulate
matter (PM 10)
Ozone
Sulfur oxides
Not to exceed 50 Iq/m 3 annually.
Not to exceed 150 Iq/n 3 /24-hour period.
Not to exceed 0.12 ppm/hr.
Not to exceed 0.03 ppm annually.
Not to exceed 0.14 ppm/24-hour period.
Not to exceed 0.5 ppm/3-hour period.
Prerequisites for
Applicability
Major stationary and mobile
sources.
Major stationary sources.
Major stationary and mobile
sources.
Major stationary sources.
Major stationary and mobile
sources.
Major stationary sources.
(a) NAAQS are translated into source-specific requirements State Implementation Plans (SIPS).
Citation
Q CFR Part
50 (CAA)
40 CFR Part
50 (CAA)
40 CFR Part
50 (CAA)
40 CFR Part
50 (CAA)
40 CFR Part
50 (CAA)
40 CFR Part
50 (CAA)
-------
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
Appendix A cont.
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
LIST OF ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES
PLANT SPECIES CONSIDERED ENDANGERED IN OHIO.
SOIL AND DRAINAGE
1501-14-4 1-3
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECLAMATION OF SURFACE MINED AREAS
ISOLATION OF ACID DRAINAGE. RESTRICTION ON SURFACE WATER
IMPOUNDMENTS. RULES FOR USE OF EXPLOSIVES. PROTECTION OF
UNDERGROUND WATER SUPPLIES, SAFETY OF HIGHWALLS, RESOILING,
REVEGETATION, DAMS AND DIVERSIONS.
REQUIRES SURVEY AND OTHER INFORMATION FOR SURFACE MINING.
CONSIDER FOR SITES WITH SOIL BORROW AREAS OR EXTENSIVE
EXCAVATION.
CONSIDER FOR SITE WITH BORROW SOURCE AREA OR EXTENSIVE
EXCAVATION.
LIST OF ENDANGERED ANIMAL SPECIES
ANALYTICAL AND COLLECTION
PROCEDURES
SPECIFIES ANALYTICAL METHODS AND COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR
SURFACE WATER DISCHARGES.
PERTAINS TO BOTH DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS AS A
RESULT OF REMEDIATION AND ANY ON-SITE SURFACE WATERS
AFFECTED BY SITE CONDITIONS.
3745-1-04 A,B,C,D,E
THE "FIVE FREEDOMS" FOR SURFACE
WATER
ALL SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE SHALL BE FREE FROM:
A) OBJECTIONABLE SUSPENDED SOLIDS,
B) FLOATING DEBRIS, OIL AND SCUM,
C) MATERIALS THAT CREATE A NUISANCE,
D) TOXIC, HARMFUL OR LETHAL SUBSTANCES,
E) NUTRIENTS THAT CREATE NUISANCE GROWTH.
PERTAINS TO BOTH DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS AS A
RESULT OF REMEDIATION AND ANY ON-SITE SURFACE WATERS
AFFECTED BY SITE CONDITIONS.
ANTIDEGRADATION POLICY FOR
SURFACE WATER
PREVENTS DEGRADATION OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY BELOW
DESIGNATED USE OR EXISTING WATER QUALITY. EXISTING IN STREAM
USES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND PROTECTED THE MOST STRINGENT
CONTROLS FOR TREATMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE DIRECTOR TO
BE EMPLOYED FOR ALL NEW AND EXISTING POINT SOURCE
DISCHARGES. PREVENTS ANY DEGRADATION OF "STATE RESOURCE
WATERS".
REQUIRES THAT BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BAT) BE USED
TO TREAT SURFACE WATER DISHARGES. DWQPA USES THIS RULE
TO SET STANDARDS WHEN EXISTING WATER QUALITY IS BETTER
THAN THE DESIGNATED USE.
MIXING ZONES FOR SURFACE WATER
(A) PRESENTS THE CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING NON-THERMAL MIXING
ZONES FOR POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES (B) PRESENTS THE CRITERIA
FOR ESTABLISHING THERMAL MIXING ZONES
FOR POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES.
APPLIED AS A TERM OF DISCHARGE PERMIT TO INSTALL (PTI).
WOULD PERTAIN TO AN ALTERNATIVE WHICH RESULTED IN A
POINT SOURCE DISCHARGE.
WATER QUALITY CRITERIA
ESTABLISHES WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR POLLUTANTS WHICH DO
NOT HAVE SPECIFIC NUMERICAL OR NARRATIVE CRITERIA IDENTIFIED IN
TABLES 7-1 THROUGH 7-15 OF THIS RULE.
PERTAINS TO BOTH DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS AS A
RESULT OF REMEDIAL ACTION AND ANY SURFACE WATERS
AFFECTED BY SITE CONDITIONS.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
3745-1-24
WATER USE DES FOR MUSKINGUM RIVER
ESTABLISHES WATER USE DESIGNATIONS FOR
WITHIN THE MUSKINGUM RIVER BASIN.
STREAM SEGMENTS
PERTINENT IF STREAM OR STREAM SEGMENT IS ON-SITE AND IS
EITHER AFFECTED BY SITE CONDITIONS OF IF REMEDY INCLUDES
DIRECT DISCHARGE. USED BY DWQPA TO ESTABLISH WASTE
LOAD ALLOCATIONS.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
MALFUNCTION S MAINTENANCE OF AIR
POLL CONTROL EQUIPMENT
MR POLLUTION NUISANCES PROHIBITED
ESTABLISHES SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE AND SPECIFIES WHEN
POLLUTION SOURCE MUST BE SHUT DOWN DURING MAINTENANCE.
DEFINES AIR POLLUTION NUISANCE AS THE EMISSION OR ESCAPE
INTO THE AIR FROM ANY SOURCE(S) OF SMOKE, ASHES, DUST, DIRT,
GRIME, ACIDS, FUMES, GASES, VAPORS, ODORS AND COMBINATIONS
OF THE ABOVE THAT ENDANGER HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF THE
PUBLIC OR CAUSE PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE SUCH
NUISANCES ARE PROHIBITED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH UTILIZES OR WILL UTILIZE AIR
POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ON-SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH CAUSES, OR MAY REASONABLY
CAUSE, AIR POLLUTION NUISANCES CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT
WILL UNDERGO EXCAVATION, DEMOLITION, CAP INSTALLATION,
METHANE PRODUCTION, CLEARING AND GRUBBING, WATER
TREATMENT, INCINERATION AND WASTE FUEL RECOVERY.
STACK HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS
ESTABLISHES ALLOWABLE STACK HEIGHT FOR AIR CONTAMINANT
SOURCES BASED ON GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT HAS OR WILL HAVE AN AIR
CONTAMINANT SOURCE ONSITE (PARTICULATE, DUST, FUMES,
GAS, MIST, SMOKE, VAPOR, ODORS) EMITTED FROM A STACK
CONSIDER FOR REMEDIES INCORPORATING INCINERATION, WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT.
PARTICULATE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
PARTICULATE NON-DEGRADATION
POLICY
VISIBLE PARTICULATE EMISSION
CONTROL
EMISSION RESTRICTIONS FOR FUGITIVE
DUST
ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR TOTAL SUSPENDED
PARTICULATES.
DEGRADATION OF AIR QUALITY IN ANY AREA WHERE AIR QUALITY IS
BETTER THAN REQUIRED BY 3145-17-02 IS PROHIBITED.
SPECIFIES THE ALLOWABLE OPACITY FOR PARTICULATE EMISSIONS,
PROVIDES EXCEPTIONS FOR UNCOMBINED WATER.
START-UP/SHUTDOWN OF FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT, MALFUNCTIONS.
ALL EMISSIONS OF FUGITIVE DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT MAY EMIT MEASURABLE
QUANTITIES OF PARTICULATE MATTER (BOTH STACK AND
FUGITIVE). CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
EXCAVATION, DEMOLITION, CAP INSTALLATION, CLEARING AND
GRUBBING, INCINERATION AND WASTE FUEL RECOVERY.
PERTAINS TO SITES IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS THAT MAY EMIT OR
ALLOW THE ESCAPE OF PARTICULATES (BOTH STACK AND
FUGITIVE). CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
EXCAVATION, DEMOLITION, CAP INSTALLATION, CLEARING AND
GRUBBING, INCINERATION.
PERTAINS TO ANY EMISSION OF PARTICULATE FROM A STACK
CONSIDER FOR INCINERATION AND FUEL BURNING.
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH MAY HAVE FUGITIVE EMISSIONS
(NON-STACK) OF DUST. CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL
UNDERGO GRADING, LOADING OPERATIONS, DEMOLITION,
CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND CONSTRUCTION.
CHEMICAL
LOCATION
INCINERATOR PARTIC EMISSION f, ODOR
RESTRICTIONS
ESTABLISHES PARTICULATE EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND
DESIGN-OPERATION REQUIREMENTS TO PREVENT THE EMISSION OF
OBJECTIONABLE ODORS.
PERTAINS TO ANY REMEDY INCORPORATING INCINERATION.
FUEL BURNING PARTIC EMISSION
RESTRICTIONS
SULFUR DIOXIDE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
ESTABLISHES PARTICULATE EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR FUEL BURNING
EQUIPMENT.
ESTABLISHES PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE.
PERTAINS TO ANY REMEDY INCORPORATING FUEL BURNING
(WASTE FUEL RECOVERY).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT EMITS OR WILL EMIT SULFUR
DIOXIDE. CONSIDER FOR INCINERATION, FUEL BURNING (WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY).
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
A,B,C,E,F
A,C
SULFUR DIOXIDE MEASUREMENT
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
SULFUR DIOXIDE AMBIENT MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSION LIMIT
PROVISIONS
OPEN BURNING STANDARDS IN
RESTRICTED AREAS
SPECIFIES TESTING METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE TESTING.
THE DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO EPA MAY REQUIRE ANY SOURCE OF
SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS TO INSTALL, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN
MONITORING DEVICES, MAINTAIN RECORDS AND FILE REPORTS.
ESTABLISHES GENERAL LIMIT PROVISIONS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE.
OPEN BURNING WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM OHIO EPA IS
PROHIBITED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT WILL EMIT SULFUR DIOXIDE.
CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UTILIZE INCINERATION OR FUEL
RECOVERY (WASTE FUEL RECOVERY)
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT EMITS OR WILL EMIT SULFUR
DIOXIDE CONSIDER FOR INCINERATION, FUEL BURNING (WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT WILL EMIT SULFUR DIOXIDE
CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO INCINERATION OR
FUEL BURNING (WASTE FUEL RECOVERY).
PERTAINS TO SITES WITHIN A RESTRICTED AREA (WITHIN THE
BOUNDARY OF A MUNICIPALITY AND A ZONE EXTENDING BEYOND
SUCH MUNICIPALITY).
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
B,C,D
OPEN BURNING STANDARDS IN
UNRESTRICTED AREAS
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND
GUIDELINES
METHODS OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
MEASUREMENT
OPEN BURNING WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM OHIO EPA IS
PROHIBITED.
ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CARBON
MONOXIDE, OZONE AND NON METHANE HYDROCARBONS.
SPECIFIES MEASUREMENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AMBIENT AIR
QUALITY FOR THE FOLLOWING CONSTITUENTS: CARBON MONOXIDE,
OZONE AND NON-METHANE HYDROCARBONS.
PERTAINS TO SITES WITHIN AN UNRESTRICTED AREA (OUTSIDE
THE BOUNDARY OF A MUNICIPALITY AND A ZONE EXTENDING
BEYOND SUCH MUNICIPALITY).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL EMIT CARBON OXIDES,
OZONE OR NON-METHANE HYDROCARBONS. CONSIDER FOR SITES
THAT WILL UNDERGO WATER TREATMENT, INCINERATION AND
FUEL BURNING (WASTE FUEL RECOVERY)
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL EMIT CARBON MONOXIDE,
OZONE OR NON-METHANE HYDROCARBONS CONSIDER FOR FOR
SITES WHERE TREATMENT SYSTEMS WILL RESULT IN AIR
EMISSIONS.
LOCATION
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
NON-DEGRADATION POLICY
A,B,G,I,J ORGANIC MATERIALS EMISSION
CONTROL: STATIONARY SOURCES
PROHIBITS SIGNIFICANT AND AVOIDABLE DETERIORATION OF AIR
QUALITY.
REQUIRES CONTROL OF EMISSIONS OF ORGANIC MATERIALS FROM
STATIONARY SOURCES. REQUIRES BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL EMIT CARBON OXIDES,
CARBON OXIDES, AND NON-METHANE HYDROCARBONS.
CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO WATER TREATMENT,
INCINERATION AND FUEL BURNING (WASTE FUEL RECOVERY).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH IS EMITTING OR WILL EMIT
ORGANIC MATERIAL, CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
WATER TREATMENT (AIR STRIPPING), INCINERATION AND FUEL
BURNING (WASTE FUEL RECOVERY).
ACTION
CHEMICAL
A,E
REQUIRES ANY STATIONARY SOURCE OF CARBON MONOXIDE TO
MINIMIZE EMISSIONS BY THE USE OF BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES AND OPERATING PRACTICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
BEST CURRENT TECHNOLOGY.
ESTABLISHES LIMITATIONS FOR EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH IS EMITTING OR WILL EMIT
CARBON MONOXIDE. CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
WATER TREATMENT, INCINERATION AND FUEL BURNING (WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY).
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
NITROGEN DIOXIDE AMBIENT AIR
QUALITY STANDARDS
ESTABLISHES A MAXIMUM AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD FOR
NITROGEN DIOXIDE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH IS EMITTING OR WILL EMIT
NITROGEN DIOXIDE CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
WATER TREATMENT, INCINERATION AND FUEL BURNING (WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY).
CHEMICAL
ACTION
A,B
MEASUREMENT METHODS FOR
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
SPECIFIES METHODS OF MEASUREMENT FOR NITROGEN DIOXIDE TO
DETERMINE AMBIENT AIR.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL EMIT NITROGEN DIOXIDE.
QUALITY CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE TREATMENT SYSTEMS MAY RESULT
IN NITROGEN DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, ESP, THERMAL TREATMENT
SYSTEMS.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
NITROGEN DIOXIDE NONDEGRADATION
POLICY
NITROGEN OXIDES EMISSION
CONTROLS: STATIONARY SOURCE
PROHIBITS THE SIGNIFICANT AND AVOIDABLE DETERIORATION OF AIR
QUALITY BY THE RELEASE OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE EMISSIONS.
REQUIRES THAT ALL STATIONARY SOURCES OF NITROGEN OXIDE
MINIMIZE EMISSIONS BY THE USE OF THE LATEST AVAILABLE CONTROL
TECHNIQUES AND OPERATING PRACTICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY ESTABLISHES LIMIT FOR NITROGEN OXIDE
EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH IS EMITTING OR WILL EMIT
NITROGEN DIOXIDE. CONSIDER FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO
WATER TREATMENT, INCINERATION AND FUEL BURNING (WASTE
FUEL RECOVERY).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL EMIT NITROGEN OXIDES.
CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE TREATMENT SYSTEMS WILL RESULT
IN NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS, ESP, THERMAL TREATMENT.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
EMISSION CONTROL ACTION PROGRAMS
REQUIRES PREPARATION FOR AIR POLLUTION ALERTS
EMERGENCIES.
AND
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH IS EMITTING OR MAY EMIT AIR
CONTAMINANTS.
EXEMPTIONS TO SOLID WASTE
REGULATIONS
DEFINES EXEMPTIONS TO SOLID WASTE REGULATIONS AND
ESTABLISHES LIMITATIONS ON TEMPORARY STORAGE OF PUTRESCIBLE
WASTE OR ANY SOLID WASTE WHICH CAUSES A NUISANCE OR HEALTH
HAZARD STORAGE OF PUTRESCIBLE WASTE BEYOND SEVEN DAYS IS
CONSIDERED OPEN DUMPING.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH SOLID WASTE WILL BE
MANAGED. CONSIDER ESPECIALLY FOR OLD LANDFILLS WHERE
SOLID WASTE MAY BE EXCAVATED AND/OR CONSOLIDATED
AUTHORIZED, LIMITED 5 PROHIBITED
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
ESTABLISHES ALLOWABLE METHODS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL:
SANITARY LANDFILL, INCINERATION, COMPOSTING PROHIBITS
MANAGEMENT BY OPEN BURNING AND OPEN DUMPING.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE At WHICH SOLID WASTES WILL BE
MANAGED PROHIBITS MANAGEMENT BY OPEN BURNING AND
OPEN DUMPING.
A, B
REQUIRED TECHNICAL INFORMATION
FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
LOCATION CRITERIA FOR SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL PERMIT
SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OF A
SOLID WASTE PERMIT TO INSTALL INCLUDED ARE A HYDROGEOLOGIC
INVESTIGATION REPORT, LEACHATE PRODUCTION AND MIGRATION
INFORMATION, SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION, DESIGN
CALCULATIONS, PLAN DRAWINGS.
SPECIFIES LOCATIONS IN WHICH SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ARE NOT TO
BE SITED. INCLUDES FLOODPLAINS, SAND OR GRAVEL PITS, LIMESTONE
OR SANDSTONE QUARRIES, AREAS ABOVE SOLE SOURCE AQUIFERS,
WETLANDS, ETC.
THIS PARAGRAPH PRESENTS SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF A
SOLID WASTE PERMIT TO INSTALL PERTAINS TO ANY NEW SOLID
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY CREATED ON-SITE AND EXPANSIONS
OF EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ALSO PERTAINS TO
EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT ARE CAPPED PER
SOLID WASTE RULES. THIS RULE ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM
INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
THIS RULE PREVENTS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW SOLID WASTE
LANDFILLS AND EXPANSIONS OF EXISTING SOLID WASTE
LANDFILLS IN CERTAIN UNFAVORABLE LOCATIONS ALSO MAY
PROHIBIT THE LEAVING OF WASTE IN PLACE IN CERTAIN
UNFAVORABLE LOCATIONS.
D,F,G,H
ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FOR SANITARY
LANDFILL APPROVAL
ADDITIONAL SITING REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO GEOLOGY,
WATER SUPPLIES. OCCUPIED PROPERTIES PARKLANDS AND MINE
SUBSIDENCE AREAS GOVERNS EXPANSION OF EXISTING SITES.
PERTAINS TO NEW SANITARY LANDFILLS FOR SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL AND EXPANSIONS OF EXISTING FACILITIES
LOCATION
ACTION
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
C,D,H
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR
SANITARY LANDFILLS
SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SOIL/CLAY LAYERS,
GRANULAR DRAINAGE LAYER, GEOSYNTHETICS, LEACHATE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, GAS MONITORING SYSTEM, ETC. ALSO
ESTABLISHES CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES TO BE
LOCATED IN GEOLOGICALLY UNFAVORABLE AREAS.
PERTAINS TO ANY NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY
CREATED ON-SITE AND ANY EXPANSIONS TO EXISTING SOLID
WASTE LANDFILLS. PORTIONS ALSO PERTAIN TO AREAS OF
CONTAMINATION THAT ARE CAPPED PER SOLID WASTE RULES.
MAY SERVE AS SITING CRITERIA.
SANITARY LANDFILL GROUND WATER
MONITORING
GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM MUST BE ESTABLISHED FOR
ALL SANITARY LANDFILL FACILITIES THE SYSTEM MUST CONSIST OF A
SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF WELLS THAT ARE LOCATED SO THAT SAMPLES
INDICATE BOTH UPGRADIENT (BACKGROUND) AND DOWNGRADIENT
WATER SAMPLES. THE SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGNED PER THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THIS RULE. THE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
PROCEDURES USED MUST COMPLY WITH THIS RULE.
PERTAINS TO ANY NEW SOLID WASTE FACILITY AND ANY
EXPANSIONS OF EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ON-SITE.
ALSO MAY PERTAIN TO EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION
THAT ARE CAPPED IN-PLACE PER THE SOLID WASTE RULES.
FINAL CLOSURE OF SANITARY LANDFILL
FACILITIES
REQUIRES CLOSURE OF A LANDFILL IN A MANNER WHICH MINIMIZES THE
NEED FOR POST CLOSURE MAINTENANCE AND MINIMIZES
POST-CLOSURE FORMATION AND RELEASE OF LEACHATE AND
EXPLOSIVE GASES TO AIR, SOIL GROUND WATER OR SURFACE WATER.
SPECIFIES ACCEPTABLE CAP DESIGN, SOIL BARRIER LAYER, GRANULAR
DRAINAGE LAYER, SOIL AND VEGETATIVE LAYER PROVIDES FOR USE
OF COMPARABLE MATERIALS TO THOSE SPECIFIED WITH APPROVAL OF
DIRECTOR.
SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS PERTAIN TO ANY NEW SOLID
WASTE LANDFILLS CREATED ON-SITE. ANY EXPANSIONS OF
EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ON-SITE AND ANY EXISTING
AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT ARE CAPPED IN-PLACE PER THE
SOLID WASTE RULES.
!V,B,D,E,MN
SANITARY LANDFILL EXPLOSIVE GAS
MONITORING
ESTABLISHES WHEN AN EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PLAN IS
REQUIRED FOR SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS. SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN SUCH A PLAN, INCLUDING DETAILED
ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ON GAS
GENERATION POTENTIAL, SAMPLING AND MONITORING PROCEDURES,
ETC. MANDATES WHEN REPAIRS MUST BE MADE TO AN EXPLOSIVE
GAS MONITORING SYSTEM. THIS RULE ONLY APPLIES TO LANDFILLS
WHICH RECEIVED "PUTRESCIBLE" SOLID WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS HAD OR WILL HAVE
PUTRESCIBLE SOLID WASTES PLACED ON-SITE AND WHICH HAS A
RESIDENCE OR OTHER OCCUPIED STRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN
1000 FEET OF THE EMPLACED SOLID WASTE.
ACTION
LOCATION
I, J
EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING
SANITARY LANDFILLS
IDENTIFIES PARAMETERS AND SCHEDULE FOR EXPLOSIVE GAS
MONITORING.
PERTAINS TO ANY DISPOSAL SITE WHERE EXPLOSIVE
GENERATION AND MIGRATION MAY BE A THREAT.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
DISTURBANCES WHERE HAZ OR
WASTE FAC WAS OPERATED
REQUIRES THAT A DETAILED PLAN BE PROVIDED TO DESCRIBE HOW ANY
PROPOSED FILLING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, BUILDING, DRILLING OR
MINING ON LAND WHERE A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY OR SOLID
WASTE FACILITY WAS OPERATED WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED THIS
INFORMATION MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES
WILL NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PUBLIC
HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT. SPECIAL TERMS TO CONDUCT SUCH
ACTIVITIES MAY BE IMPOSED BY THE DIRECTOR TO PROTECT THE
PUBLIC AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS OR SOLID WASTE
HAS BEEN MANAGED, EITHER INTENTIONALLY OR OTHERWISE
DOES NOT PERTAIN TO AREAS THAT HAVE HAD ONE-TIME LEAKS
OR SPILLS.
POST CLOSURE CARE OF SANITARY
LANDFILL FACILITIES
SPECIFIES THE REQUIRED POST-CLOSURE CARE FOR SOLID WASTE
FACILITIES. INCLUDES CONTINUING OPERATION OF LEACHATE AND
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. MAINTENANCE OF THE CAP
SYSTEM AND GROUND WATER MONITORING.
SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS PERTAIN TO ANY NEWLY CREATED
SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ON-SITE, ANY EXPANSIONS OF
EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS ON-SITE AND ANY EXISTING
AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT ARE CAPPED PER THE SOLID
WASTE RULES.
-------
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
A,D
SOLID WASTE INCINERATOR 5
COMPOSTING OPERATIONS
ESTABLISHES OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE
INCINERATORS AND COMPOSTING FACILITIES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH SOLID WASTE WILL BE EITHER
INCINERATED OR COMPOSTED ON-SITE.
SANITARY LANDFILL GENERAL
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
SPECIFIES GENERAL OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE
LANDFILLS. INCLUDES REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATIONS FOR
OPERATING DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER, MANAGEMENT TO MINIMIZE
NOISE, DUST AND ODORS, VECTOR CONTROL; ADEQUATE FIRE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT; NOT CAUSING A NUISANCE OR HEALTH HAZARD
OR WATER POLLUTION MINIMIZATION OF DISTURBED AREA; CHEMICAL
COMPATIBILITY TESTING, IF NECESSARY. SPECIFIES THAT BULK
LIQUIDS, HAZARDOUS WASTE, PCBs AND INFECTIOUS WASTE MAY NOT
BE ACCEPTED FOR DISPOSAL.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION. PORTIONS ALSO MAY PERTAIN
TO EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT WILL BE CAPPED
IN PLACE PER SOLID WASTE RULES.
SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS
CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE
REQUIRES THE OWNER/OPERATOR TO IMPLEMENT MEASURES TO
ATTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THESE RULES IN THE
EVENT THAT TESTING INDICATES THAT A COMPONENT OR PORTION OF
THE LANDFILL HAVE NOT BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THOSE RULES.
PERTAINS TO "NEW" SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION. ALSO PERTAINS TO
CONSTRUCTION OF FINAL COVER SYSTEMS.
SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS
FINAL COVER
INCLUDES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FINAL CAP SYSTEM FOR AREAS AT
FINAL ELEVATIONS.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION. PORTIONS ALSO MAY PERTAIN
TO EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT WILL BE CAPPED
IN PLACE PER SOLID WASTE RULES.
SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS - PCBs
AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
REQUIRES OWNERS/OPERATORS TO CONDUCT A PROGRAM TO DETECT
PCS WASTE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO DISPOSAL UPON
DETECTION ON SUSPECTED DETECTION OF SUCH WASTES, REQUIRES
THOSE WASTES TO NOT BE PLACED AT THE WORKING FACE OF THE
LANDFILL AND TO MANAGE THOSE WASTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION.
SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS
SURFACE WATER MGMNT.
SURFACE WATER MUST BE DIVERTED FROM AREAS WHERE SOLID
WASTE IS BEING, OR HAS BEEN, DEPOSITED. ALSO REQUIRES RUN
AND RUN-OFF TO BE CONTROLLED TO MINIMIZE INFILTRATION THROUGH
THE COVER MATERIALS AND TO MINIMIZE EROSION OF THE CAP
SYSTEM.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
ON CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION. PORTIONS ALSO MAY PERTAIN
TO EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT WILL BE CAPPED
IN-PLACE PER SOLID WASTE RULES.
SANITARY LANDFILL OPERATIONS
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT
REQUIRES REPAIR OF LEACHATE OUTBREAKS; COLLECTION AND
TREATMENT OF LEACHATE ON THE SURFACE OF THE LANDFILL; AND
ACTIONS TO MINIMIZE, CONTROL OR ELIMINATE CONDITIONS CAUSING
LEACHATE OUTBREAKS.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION. PORTIONS ALSO MAY PERTAIN
TO EXISTING AREAS OF CONTAMINATION THAT WILL BE CAPPED
IN-PLACE PER SOLID WASTE RULES.
SANITARY LANDFILLS PROHIBITIONS
AND CLOSURE
SPECIFIES CERTAIN OPERATIONAL AND LOCATION STANDARDS FOR
LANDFILLS ACCEPTING WASTE AFTER JUNE 1, 1994, ALSO REQUIRES
CLOSURE OF EXISTING UNITS WHICH DO NOT MEET THOSE STANDARDS
BY OCTOBER 6, 1996.
PERTAINS TO NEW SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES TO BE
CREATED ON-SITE AND EXISTING LANDFILLS THAT WILL BE
EXPANDED DURING REMEDIATION PORTIONS
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
PROHIBITIONS AND CLOSURE
C,D,I,J,K,L,M,N ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FOR SOLID
WASTE INCINERATOR PTI
RULES FOR NEW AND EXISTING SITES, LOCATION RULES WITH
RESPECT TO FLOOD PLAINS, AIRPORTS, GEOLOGIC FAULTS PLUS LINER
/LEACHATE REQUIREMENTS.
RULES FOR LOCATION OF INCINERATOR (SETBACK FROM WATER
SUPPLIES, FLOODPLAINS, PARKLANDS, DOMICILES). CONSTRUCTION
GUIDELINES INCLUDING LEACHATE CONTROL SYSTEM.
PERTAINS TO SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS OPENED AFTER 06/01/94.
OR EXISTING FACILITIES RECEIVING WASTE AFTER 06/01/94.
PERTAINS TO SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS WHICH MAY BE
CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF REMEDIATION EFFORTS AT SITE.
OPERATION OF SOLID WASTE
INCINERATOR FACILITIES
FINAL CLOSURE, SOLID WASTE
INCINERATOR
RULES FOR SAFE OPERATION OF INCINERATOR INCLUDING ACCESS
CONTROL, FIRE CONTROL, RECORD KEEPING, EMERGENCY PLANS,
ON-SITE STORAGE, WASTES FORBIDDEN FROM INCINERATION,
GROUNDWATER MONITORING, LEACHATE CONTROL, WASTE HANDLING.
REQUIRES INCINERATOR SITE TO BE DECONTAMINATED UPON CLOSURE
AND LEACHATE SYSTEM DECOMMISSIONED TO PREVENT FUTURE
POLLUTION PROBLEMS.
PERTAINS TO INCINERATORS WHICH MAY BE CONSTRUCTED AS
PART OF ON-SITE REMEDIATION EFFORTS.
APPLICABLE TO SITES WHICH INCINERATED HAZARDOUS WASTES.
WATER/AIR PERMIT CRITERIA FOR
DECISION BY THE DIRECTOR
WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR
DECISION BY THE DIRECTOR
A PERMIT TO INSTALL (PTI) OR PLANS MUST DEMONSTRATE BEST
AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BAT) AND SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH OR
PREVENT THE ATTAINMENT OR MAINTENANCE OF APPLICABLE AMBIENT
AIR QUALITY STANDARDS.
SPECIFIES SUBSTANTIVE CRITERIA FOR SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY
CRITERIA FOR DREDGING, FILLING, OBSTRUCTING OR ALTERING
WATERS OF THE STATE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT WILL DISCHARGE TO ON-SITE
SURFACE WATER OR WILL EMIT CONTAMINANTS INTO THE AIR.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT HAS OR WILL AFFECT WATERS OF
THE STATE.
PROHIBITION OF UNAUTHORIZED
INJECTION
UNDERGROUND INJECTION IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION
FROM THE DIRECTOR.
PERTAINS TO SITES AT WHICH MATERIALS ARE TO BE INJECTED
UNDERGROUND CONSIDER FOR TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS
BIOREMEDIATION AND SOIL FLUSHING.
THE UNDERGROUND INJECTION OF FLUID CONTAINING ANY
CONTAMINANT INTO AN UNDERGROUND SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER
IS PROHIBITED OF THE PRESENCE OF THAT CONTAMINANT MAY CAUSE A
VIOLATION OF THE PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS OR OTHER
WISE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE HEALTH OF PERSONS.
PERTAINS TO SITES AT WHICH MATERIALS
UNDERGROUND CONSIDER FOR TECHNOLOGIES
BIOREMEDIATION AND SOIL FLUSHING.
\RE TO BE INJECTED
SUCH AS
A,B
PETITIONS TO EXCLUDE A LISTED
WASTE AT A FACILITY
ALLOWS FOR PETITIONS TO EXCLUDE HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM A
PARTICULAR FACILITY FROM THE LISTS IN RULES 3745-51-30 TO
3745-51-31 OF THE OAC. ALSO STATES THAT OHIO EPA WILL
RECOGNIZE USEPA'S DECISION TO GRANT OR DENY SUCH PETITIONS ON
THE FEDERAL LEVEL.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS WASTES THAT WILL BE
DELISTED BY USEPA. SHOULD OHIO LIST WASTES NOT
ADDRESSED BY USEPA, THIS RULE WOULD ALLOW OHIO EPA THE
OPPORTUNITY TO DELIST THESE WASTES.
RECYCLING VARIANCES FROM
CLASSIFICATION AS A WASTE
PRESENTS CRITERIA BY WHICH DIRECTOR MAY GRANT REQUESTS FOR
VARIANCE FROM CLASSIFYING CERTAIN MATERIALS AS A WASTE
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT HAS WASTES
RECYCLED OR RECLAIMED
THAT MAY BE
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
ADD'L REG OF CERTAIN HAZ WASTE
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
DIRECTOR MAY REGULATE HAZARDOUS WASTES OTHERWISE EXEMPTED
BECAUSE OF RECYCLING ACTIVITIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES ON A
CASE-BY-CASE BASIS THE CRITERIA TO MAKE THIS DECISION ARE
PROVIDED BY THIS RULE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT HAS HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT
WILL BE EXEMPTED FROM THE HAZARDOUS WASTE RULES PER
OAC 3745-51-06 (RECYCLING EXEMPTIONS).
ACTION
CHEMICAL
3745-50-44
3745-50-44
3745-50-44
PERMIT INFO REQUIRED FOR ALL HA
WASTE FACILITIES
PERMIT INFO REQ FOR ALL HAZ WASTE
LAND DISP FACILITIES
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
STORAGE IN CONTAINERS
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
STORAGE/TREAT IN TANKS
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
STOR/TREAT IN SURF IMPOUND
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
STOR/TREAT IN WASTE PILES
ESTABLISHES THE SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE FACILITY
COMPLIANCE INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS FACILITY
DESCRIPTION, WASTE CHARACTERISTICS, EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS,
CONTINGENCY PLAN, FACILITY LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, ETC.
ESTABLISHES THE SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE
ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF THE GROUND WATER INCLUDES
INFORMATION SUCH AS GROUND WATER MONITORING DATA,
INFORMATION ON INTERCONNECTED AQUIFERS, PLUME(S) OF
CONTAMINATION, PLANS AND REPORTS ON GROUND WATER
MONITORING PROGRAM, ETC.
ESTABLISHES THE SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF CONTAINER STORAGE INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS
DESCRIPTION OF CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, DETAILED DRAWINGS, ETC.
SEE OAC 3745-55-70 THROUGH 3745-55-78 FOR ADDITIONAL
CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF TANK TREATMENT AND STORAGE UNITS. INCLUDES INFORMATION
SUCH AS ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, DETAILED PLANS
OF TANK SYSTEM(S), DESCRIPTION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
SYSTEM, ETC. SEE OAC 3745-55-90 THROUGH 3745-55-99 FOR
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF BOTH NEW SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AND EXTENSIONS OF
EXISTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS USED TO STORE OR TREAT
HAZARDOUS WASTE. INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE
CHARACTERISTICS, DETAILED PLANS AND REPORTS, INFORMATION ON
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY, CLOSURE INFORMATION, ETC. SEE OAC
3745-56-20 THROUGH 3745-56-33 FOR ADDITIONAL SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENT REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS USED TO TREAT OR STORE HAZARDOUS
WASTE INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS,
DETAILED DESIGN PLANS AND REPORTS, CONTROL OF RUN-ON AND
RUN-OFF, CLOSURE INFORMATION, ETC. SEE OAC 3745-56-20 THROUGH
3745-56-33 FOR ADDITIONAL SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT REQUIREMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL HAVE TREATMENT, STORAGE
OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OCCURRING ON-SITE OR
HAS EXISTING AREAS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAMINATION
ON-SITE THAT WILL BE CAPPED IN-PLACE. THIS, ALONG WITH
OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM
INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO ANY FACILITY/SITE WHICH WILL HAVE HAZARDOUS
WASTE DISPOSED OF ON-SITE OR HAS EXISTING AREAS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAMINATION ON-SITE THAT WILL BE
CAPPED IN PLACE THIS, ALONG WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF
THIS RULE, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED
DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE ON-SITE WILL OCCUR IN CONTAINERS, CONSIDER FOR
WASTES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS THAT ARE STORED PRIOR
TO TREATMENT OR DISPOSAL. THIS, ALONG WITH OTHER
PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-55-70 THROUGH
3745-55-78, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED
DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH STORAGE OR TREATMENT OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE IN TANKS WILL OCCUR ON-SITE. THIS,
ALONG WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC
3745-55-90 THROUGH 3745-55-99, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM
INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH EITHER A NEW SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENT WILL BE INSTALLED OR AN EXISTING SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENT WILL BE EXPANDED. THIS, ALONG WITH OTHER
PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-20-50 THROUGH
3745-33-60, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED
DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL DE
STORED OR TREATED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS. THIS, ALONG
WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-56-20
THROUGH 3745-56-33, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION
REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
-------
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
TREAT/DISP BY LAND TREAT
3745-50-44
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: ENVIRONMENTAL
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF LAND TREATMENT TO TREAT OR DISPOSE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS, DESIGN
MEASURES TO MAXIMIZE TREATMENT, DIMENSIONS OF TREATMENT
ZONE, DESIGN OF UNIT, INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL CROPS, ETC. SEE
OAC 3745-56-70 THROUGH 3745-56-83 FOR ADDITIONAL LAND
TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND TREATMENT UNITS,
LANDFILLS, AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED TO TREAT,
STORE OR DISPOSE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INCLUDES INFORMATION
SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS, DETAILED DESIGN PLANS AND
REPORTS, CONTROL OF RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF, CLOSURE INFORMATION,
ETC. SEE OAC 3745-57-01 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH LAND TREATMENT WILL BE
USED TO TREAT OR DISPOSE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES. THIS,
ALONG WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC
3745-20-50 THROUGH 3745-33-60, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM
INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE OR
HAS BEEN STORED, TREATED OR DISPOSED OF IN SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND TREATMENT UNITS,
LANDFILLS OR UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS. THIS, ALONG
WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-57-01
ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING
THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
3745-50-44
3745-50-44
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
DISPOSAL IN LANDFILLS
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE
TREATMENT BY INCINERATION
ADD'L PERMIT INFO: HAZ WASTE T/S/D
IN MISC UNITS
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF LANDFILLS USED FOR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE.
INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS, DETAILED
DESIGN PLANS AND REPORTS, CONTROL OF RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF,
CLOSURE INFORMATION, ETC. SEE OAC 3745-57-02 THROUGH
3745-57-18 FOR ADDITIONAL LANDFILL REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF INCINERATORS USED TO TREAT HAZARDOUS WASTE INCLUDES
INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS, DETAILED DESIGN
PLANS AND REPORTS, TRIAL BURN DATA, CLOSURE INFORMATION,
ETC. SEE OAC 3745-57-40 THROUGH 3745-57-51 FOR ADDITIONAL
INCINERATOR REQUIREMENTS.
ESTABLISHES SUBSTANTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE ADEQUACY
OF MISCELLANEOUS UNITS USED TO TREAT OR STORE HAZARDOUS
WASTE INCLUDES INFORMATION SUCH AS WASTE CHARACTERISTICS,
DETAILED DESIGN PLANS AND REPORTS, CONTROL OF RUN-ON AND
RUN-OFF, CLOSURE INFORMATION, ETC. SEE OAC 3745-57-90
THROUGH 3745-57-93 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS.
PERTAINS TO SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE OR
HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS. THIS, ALONG WITH
OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-57-02
THROUGH 3745-57-18, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION
REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED BY INCINERATION. THIS, ALONG WITH OTHER
PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE AND OAC 3745-57-40 THROUGH
3745-57-51, ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED
DURING THE REMEDIAL DESIGN STAGE.
PERTAINS TO FACILITY/SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL
BE STORED, TREATED OR DISPOSED OF IN MISCELLANEOUS
UNITS. THIS, ALONG WITH OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS RULE
AND OAC 3745-57-90 THROUGH 3745-57-93, ESTABLISHES THE
MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED DURING THE REMEDIAL
DESIGN STAGE.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PERMIT
CONDITIONS
TRIAL BURN FOR INCINERATORS
ESTABLISHES GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS APPLIED TO ALL
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES IN OHIO INCLUDES CONDITIONS SUCH
AS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SITE ACCESS, MONITORING, ETC.
SPECIFIES REQUIREMENTS OF A TRIAL BURN.
PERTAINS TO ALL ALTERNATIVES THAT WILL INCORPORATE
TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE INCORPORATING ON-SITE
INCINERATION.
REQ FOR CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLED
MATERIALS
SPECIFIES REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL
QUANTITY GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE PROVIDES RELIEF
FROM MANY OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS.
DEFINES RECYCLED HAZARDOUS WASTES AND ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC
EXEMPTIONS FOR THESE WASTES FROM THE HAZARDOUS WASTE
REGULATIONS.
CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE THE QUANTITY OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE GENERATED BY AN ON-SITE ACTION WILL BE LESS THAN
100 KG PER MONTH MONTHLY LIMIT FOR ACUTE HAZARDOUS
WASTE IS ONE (1) KG.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH RECYCLING OF HAZARDOUS
WASTES MAY TAKE PLACE. CONSIDER FOR SITES AT WHICH THE
FOLLOWING MATERIALS ARE PRESENT:
INDUSTRIAL ETHYL ALCOHOL
USED BATTERIES
USED OIL
SCRAP METAL
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
K087 COAL AND COKE TAR SLUDGE
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
A,B
RESIDUES OF HAZ WASTES IN EMPTY
CONTAINERS
EXEMPTS THE RESIDUES OF HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM EMPTY
CONTAINERS FROM THE HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS. PROVIDES
SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS FOR THESE RESIDUES.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE IN CONTAINERS.
STORAGE
EVALUATION OF WASTES
ANY PERSON GENERATING A WASTE MUST DETERMINE IF THAT WASTE
IS A HAZARDOUS WASTE (EITHER THROUGH LISTING OR BY
CHARACTERISTIC).
PERTAINS TO SITES AT WHICH WASTES OF ANY TYPE (BOTH
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS) ARE LOCATED.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST -
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
REQUIRES A GENERATOR WHO TRANSPORTS OR OFFERS FOR
TRANSPORTATION HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR OFF-SITE TREATMENT.
STORAGE OR DISPOSAL TO PREPARE A UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANIFEST.
PERTAINS TO SITES WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE FOR TREATMENT, STORAGE OR
DISPOSAL
CHEMICAL
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST -
NUMBER OF COPIES
SPECIFIES THE NUMBER OF MANIFEST COPIES TO BE PREPARED.
PERTAINS TO SITES WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE FOR TREATMENT, STORAGE OR
DISPOSAL
CHEMICAL
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST - USE
SPECIFIES PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANIFESTS INCLUDING A REQUIREMENT THAT THEY BE HAND SIGNED
BY THE GENERATOR.
PERTAINS TO SITES WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE FOR TREATMENT, STORAGE OR
DISPOSAL
CHEMICAL
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE PACKAGING
REQUIRES A GENERATOR TO PACKAGE HAZARDOUS WASTE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DOT REGULATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION
OFF-SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
GENERATED BY ON-SITE ACTIVITIES AND SHIPPED OFF-SITE FOR
TREATMENT AND/OR DISPOSAL.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE LABELING
REQUIRES PACKAGES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO BE LANDFILLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DOT REGULATIONS FOR OFF-SITE
TRANSPORTATION.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
GENERATED BY ON-SITE ACTIVITIES AND SHIPPED OFF-SITE FOR
TREATMENT AND/OR DISPOSAL
CHEMICAL
ACTION
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
HAZARDOUS WASTE MARKING
SPECIFIES LANGUAGE FOR MARKING PACKAGES OF HAZ
PRIOR TO OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION.
iRDOUS WASTE
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
GENERATED BY ON-SITE ACTIVITIES AND SHIPPED OFF-SITE FOR
TREATMENT AND/OR DISPOSAL.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
GENERATOR SHALL PLACARD HA
TRANSPORTATION.
5ARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO OFF-SITE
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
GENERATED BY ON-SITE ACTIVITIES AND SHIPPED OFF-SITE FOR
TREATMENT AND/OR DISPOSAL.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
ACCUMULATION TIME OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
IDENTIFIES MAXIMUM TIME PERIODS THAT A GENERATOR MAY
ACCUMULATE A HAZARDOUS WASTE WITHOUT BEING CONSIDERED AN
OPERATOR OF A STORAGE FACILITY ALSO ESTABLISHES STANDARDS
FOR MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES BY GENERATORS.
PERTAINS TO A SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
GENERATED AS A RESULT OF THE REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES
CHEMICAL
ACTION
GENERAL ANALYSIS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
PRIOR TO ANY TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS
WASTES, A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF THE WASTE MUST BE
CHEMICALLY AND PHYSICALLY ANALYZED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF)
3745-54-15
SECURITY FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
FACILITIES
INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST BE SECURED SO THAT
UNAUTHORIZED AND UNKNOWING ENTRY ARE MINIMIZED OR
PROHIBITED.
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST BE INSPECTED REGULARLY TO
DETECT MALFUNCTIONS, DETERIORATIONS, OPERATIONAL ERRORS AND
DISCHARGES ANY MALFUNCTIONS OR DETERIORATIONS DETECTED
SHALL BE REMEDIED EXPEDITIOUSLY.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED
OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF)
REQ FOR IGNITABLE, REACTIVE OR
INCOMPATIBLE HAZ WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN TO PREVENT
ACCIDENTAL IGNITION OR REACTION OF IGNITABLE, REACTIVE OR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY REACTIVE,
IGNITABLE OR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES ARE PRESENT.
ACTION
LOCATION
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE T/S/D FACILITIES
DESIGN f, OPERATION OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE FACILITIES
RESTRICTS THE SITING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES IN AREAS OF
SEISMIC ACTIVITY OR FLOODPLAINS.
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED,
MAINTAINED AND OPERATED TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBILITY OF FIRE,
EXPLOSION OR UNPLANNED RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OR
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS TO THE AIR, SOIL OR SURFACE WATER
WHICH COULD THREATEN HUMAN HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
A,B,C,D
REQUIRED EQUIPMENT FOR HAZARDOUS
WASTE FACILITIES
ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH
EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS AN ALARM SYSTEM, FIRE CONTROL
EQUIPMENT AND A TELEPHONE OR RADIO.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
TESTING S, MAINTENANCE OF
EQUIPMENT, HAZ WASTE FACILITIES
ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS OR
ALARM SYSTEM HAZ WASTE FAC
ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST TEST AND MAINTAIN
EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT TO ASSURE PROPER OPERATION.
WHENEVER HAZARDOUS WASTE IS BEING HANDLED ALL PERSONNEL
INVOLVED SHALL HAVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS TO AN INTERNAL ALARM
OR EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION DEVICE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF JOB HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
REQUIRED AISLE SPACE AT HAZ WASTE
FACILITIES
ADEQUATE AISLE SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO ALLOW
UNOBSTRUCTED MOVEMENT OF PERSONNEL, FIRE EQUIPMENT, SPILL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND DECONTAMINATION EQUIPMENT INTO ANY
AREA OF THE FACILITY OPERATION IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE WASTES WILL BE STORED IN
CONTAINERS.
ARRANGEMENTS/AGREEMENTS WITH
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
ARRANGEMENTS OR AGREEMENTS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES, SUCH AS
POLICE, FIRE DEPARTMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS MUST
BE MADE. IF LOCAL AUTHORITIES WILL NOT COOPERATE,
DOCUMENTATION OF THAT NON-COOPERATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
CONTENT OF CONTINGENCY PLAN; HAZ
WASTE FACILITIES
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES MUST HAVE A CONTINGENCY PLAN
THAT ADDRESSES ANY UNPLANNED RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
OR HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS INTO THE AIR, SOIL OR SURFACE
WATER. THIS RULE ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
INFORMATION OF SUCH A PLAN.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
COPIES OF CONTINGENCY PLAN;
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES
COPIES OF THE CONTINGENCY PLAN REQUIRED BY 3745-54-50 MUST BE
MAINTAINED AT THE FACILITY AND SUBMITTED TO ALL LOCAL POLICE
DEPARTMENTS, FIRE DEPARTMENTS, HOSPITALS LOCAL EMERGENCY
RESPONSE TEAMS AND THE OHIO EPA.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
3745-54-54
AMENDMENT OF CONTINGENCY PLAN;
HAZ WASTE FACILITIES
EMERGENCY COORDINATOR;
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES
THE CONTINGENCY PLAN MUST BE AMENDED IF IT FAILS IN AN
EMERGENCY, THE FACILITY CHANGES (IN ITS DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
MAINTENANCE OR OPERATION), THE LIST OF EMERGENCY
COORDINATORS CHANGE OR THE LIST OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT.
AT ALL TIMES THERE SHOULD BE AT LEAST ONE EMPLOYEE EITHER ON
THE PREMISES OR ON CALL TO COORDINATE ALL EMERGENCY
RESPONSE MEASURES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
EMERGENCY PROCEDURES; HAZARDOUS
WASTE FACILITIES
GROUND WATER PROTECTION;
APPLICABILITY
SPECIFIES THE PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED IN THE EVENT OF AN
EMERGENCY.
ESTABLISHES CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH AN OPERATOR OF A
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY MUST IMPLEMENT A GROUND WATER
PROTECTION PROGRAM OR A CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN DISPOSED OF).
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF
CONTAMINATION.
REQ GROUND WATER PROGRAMS FOR
HAZ WASTE FACILITIES
PRESENTS THE GROUND WATER MONITORING AND RESPONSE
PROGRAMS REQUIRED FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND BASED UNITS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
GROUND WATER PROTECTION
STANDARD, HAZ WASTE FACILITIES
COMPLIANCE MUST BE ATTAINED WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN
THE PERMIT TO ENSURE THAT HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS (SEE
3745-54-93) DO NOT EXCEED THE PROMULGATED LIMITS (SEE
3745-54-94).
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
3745-54-94
A,B
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS IN GROUND
WATER, HAZ WASTE FAC
CONCENTRATION LIMITS FOR GROUND
WATER; HAZ WASTE FAC
REQUIRES THAT PERMIT SPECIFY HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS TO WHICH
THE GROUND WATER PROTECTION STANDARD OF 3745-54-92 APPLIES
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS ARE CONSTITUENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE
APPENDIX OF THIS RULE THAT HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN GROUND
WATER IN THE UPPERMOST AQUIFER UNDERLYING THE UNIT(S) AND ARE
REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE IN OR DERIVED FROM WASTE
CONTAINED IN THE UNIT(S).
PRESENTS THE METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING CONCENTRATION
LIMITS AND ALTERNATIVE CONCENTRATION LIMITS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
A,B
POINT OF COMPLIANCE FOR GROUND
WATER; HAZ WASTE FACIL
ESTABLISHES POINT OF COMPLIANCE AT VERTICAL SURFACE LOCATED
AT THE HYDRAULICALLY DOWNGRADIENT LIMIT OF THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT AREA THAT EXTENDS DOWN INTO THE UPPERMOST
AQUIFER UNDERLYING THE UNIT(S).
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES. LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILL). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
COMPLIANCE PERIOD FOR GROUND
WATER; HAZ WASTE FACIL
A COMPLIANCE PERIOD DURING WHICH THE GROUND WATER
PROTECTION STANDARDS APPLY WILL BE SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT.
RULE REQUIRES THAT THE COMPLIANCE PERIOD FOR A FACILITY
UNDERGOING A CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM WILL EXTEND UNTIL IT
CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE GROUND WATER PROTECTION
STANDARD OF OAC 3745-54-92 HAS NOT BEEN EXCEEDED FOR A
PERIOD OF THREE CONSECUTIVE YEARS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
GEN GROUND WATER MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS; HAZ WASTE FAC
PRESENTS GENERAL GROUND WATER MONITORING PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDES NUMBER, LOCATION AND DEPTH OF WELLS,
CASING REQUIREMENTS, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES, ETC.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
GROUND WATER DETECTION
MONITORING PROG; HAZ WASTE FAC
PRESENTS REQUIREMENTS OF GROUND WATER DETECTION PROGRAM.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS) AT WHICH HAZARDOUS
CONSTITUENTS HAVE NOT BEEN DETECTED IN THE GROUND
WATER. THIS INCLUDES EXISTING LAND BASED AREAS OF
CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
GROUND WATER COMPLIANCE
MONITORING PROG; HAZ WASTE FAC
PRESENTS REQUIREMENTS OF GROUND WATER COMPLIANCE
MONITORING PROGRAM.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS) AT WHICH HAZARDOUS
CONSTITUENTS HAVE BEEN DETECTED. THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
3745-55-01
GROUND WATER CORRECTIVE ACTION
PROGRAM; HAZ WASTE FAC
PRESENTS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A GROUND WATER CORRECTIVE
ACTION PROGRAM THAT PREVENTS HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS FROM
EXCEEDING THEIR RESPECTIVE CONCENTRATION LIMITS AT THE
COMPLIANCE POINT BY EITHER REMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF THESE
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS) AT WHICH HAZARDOUS
CONSTITUENTS HAVE BEEN DETECTED THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR WASTE
MANAGEMENT UNITS
REQUIRES AN APPLICANT FOR A HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMIT TO
INSTITUTE CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR ALL RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE OR CONSTITUENTS FFIOM ANY WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT,
REGARDLESS OF THE TIME AT WHICH WASTE WAS PLACED IN SUCH
UNIT.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES, LAND
TREATMENT UNITS, LANDFILLS) AT WHICH HAZARDOUS
CONSTITUENTS HAVE BEEN DETECTED THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
GENERAL CLOSURE PERFORMANCE
STANDARD, HAZ WASTE FACIL
REQUIRES THAT ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES BE CLOSED IN
MANNER THAT MINIMIZES THE NEED FOR FURTHER MAINTENANCE,
CONTROLS, MINIMIZES, ELIMINATES OR PREVENTS POST-CLOSURE
ESCAPE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS,
LEACHATE, CONTAMINATED RUN-OFF OR HAZARDOUS WASTE
DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS TO THE GROUND OR SURFACE WATER OR
THE ATMOSPHERE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN TREATED,
STORED OR DISPOSED OF).
CONTENT OF CLOSURE PLAN; HAZ
WASTE FACILITIES
SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED IN A CLOSURE PLAN
FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLAN.
SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS PERTAIN TO ANY SITE AT WHICH
HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED
OF (OR HAS BEEN TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF).
3745-55-14
DISPOSAL/DECON OF EQUIPMENT,
STRUCTURES S SOILS
REQUIRES THAT ALL CONTAMINATED EQUIPMENT, STRUCTURES AND
SOILS BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF OR DECONTAMINATED REMOVAL OF
HAZARDOUS WASTES OR CONSTITUENTS FROM A UNIT MAY
CONSTITUTE GENERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE IS TO BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF (OR HAS BEEN TREATED,
STORED OR DISPOSED OF).
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PROPERTY
\ND USE OF
SPECIFIES THE POST-CLOSURE CARE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING
MAINTENANCE, MONITORING AND POST-CLOSURE USE OF PROPERTY.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND-BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (LANDFILLS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES,
LAND TREATMENT UNITS AND TANKS THAT MEET REQUIREMENTS
OF LANDFILLS AFTER
CLOSURE). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING LAND-BASED AREAS OF
CONTAMINATION.
PRESENTS THE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR OHIO EPA TO DETERMINE
THE ADEQUACY OF A POST-CLOSURE PLAN.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (LANDFILLS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES,
LAND TREATMENT UNITS AND TANKS THAT MEET REQUIREMENTS
OF LANDFILLS AFTER CLOSURE). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
3745-55-19
REQUIRES THAT A RECORD OF THE TYPE, LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF
HAZARDOUS WASTES DISPOSED OF IN EACH UNIT BE SUBMITTED TO
THE LOCAL LAND AUTHORITY AND THE DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO EPA.
ALSO REQUIRES THAT A NOTATION TO THE DEED TO THE FACILITY
PROPERTY BE MADE INDICATING THAT THE LAND WAS USED TO
MANAGE HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THAT CERTAIN USE RESTRICTIONS
MAY APPLY TO THE PROPERTY.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES WITH LAND BASED HAZARDOUS WASTE
UNITS (LANDFILLS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, WASTE PILES,
LAND TREATMENT UNITS AND TANKS THAT MEET REQUIREMENTS
OF LANDFILLS AFTER CLOSURE). THIS INCLUDES EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
3745-55-71
CONTAINERS HOLDING HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE MAINTAINED IN
GOOD CONDITION (NO RUST OR STRUCTURAL DEFECTS).
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
COMPATIBILITY OF WASTE WITH
CONTAINERS
HAZARDOUS WASTES PLACED IN CONTAINER MUST NOT REACT WITH
THE CONTAINER MATERIAL OR LINER MATERIAL.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
MANAGEMENT OF CONTAINERS
CONTAINERS HOLDING HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE CLOSED (EXCEPT
TO ADD OR REMOVE WASTE) AND MUST NOT BE HANDLED IN A
MANNER THAT MAY RUPTURE THE CONTAINER OR CAUSE IT TO LEAK.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
CONTAINER INSPECTIONS
REQUIRES AT LEAST WEEKLY INSPECTIONS OF CONTAINER STORAGE
AREAS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
CONTAINER STORAGE AREA
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
REQUIRES THAT CONTAINER STORAGE AREAS HAVE A CONTAINMENT
SYSTEM AND SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH A
SYSTEM.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABLE/REACTIVE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN TO PREVENT
ACCIDENTAL IGNITION OR REACTION OF IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE
WASTES THAT WILL BE STORED IN CONTAINERS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY REACTIVE OR
IGNITABLE WASTES THAT ARE STORED, OR ARE TO BE STORED,
IN CONTAINERS.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
CONTAINER REQUIREMENTS FOR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE
WASTES ARE
PRESENT.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
CONTAINER CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
SPECIFIES CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTAINERS AND
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
STORED IN CONTAINERS.
3745-55-91 A,B,D
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING TANK
SYSTEMS INTEGRITY
REQUIRES THAT EACH EXISTING TANK USED TO STORE OR TREAT
HAZARDOUS WASTE THAT DOES NOT HAVE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
BE TESTED TO
ASSURE TANK INTEGRITY.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS EXISTING HAZARDOUS
WASTE TREATMENT OR STORAGE TANKS THAT LACK
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
, G
DESIGN 5 INSTALLATION OF NEW TANK
SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS
REQUIRES A SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEM FOR TANKS AND
ASSESSMENT TO DETERMINE TANK INTEGRITY
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
3745-55-94
3745-55-95
A,G, I
A,B,C
A,D
A,B,C,E
A,B
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF
RELEASES FOR TANK SYSTEMS
GENERAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
FOR TANK SYSTEMS
INSPECTIONS OF TANK SYSTEMS
RESPONSE TO LEAKS OR SPILLS OF
TANK SYSTEMS
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE
FOR TANK SYSTEMS
REQUIRES SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS
FOR TANKS.
SPECIFIES GENERAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK SYSTEMS.
REQUIRES INSPECTIONS AT LEAST ONCE EACH OPERATING DAY.
REQUIRES THAT UNFIT TANKS BE REMOVED FROM USE AND FURTHER
RELEASES BE PREVENTED.
SPECIFIES CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK
SYSTEMS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN TANKS.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
TANK REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABLE/REACTIVE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN TO PREVENT
ACCIDENTAL IGNITION OR REACTION OF IGNITABLE OR REACIIVE
WASTES THAT ARE TREATED OR STORED IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY REACTIVE OR
IGNITABLE WASTES ARE STORED OR TREATED (OR TO BE STORED
OR TREATED) IN EXISTING TANKS.
A,B
TANK REQUIREMENTS FOR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
POTENTAILLY INCOMPATIBLE WASTES THAT ARE STORED OR TREATED
IN TANKS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE
WASTES ARE STORED OR TREATED (OR TO BE STORED OR
TREATED) IN TANKS.
DESIGN 5 OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
PRESENTS DESIGN AND OPERATING CRITERIA FOR
IMPOUNDMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS).
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT
WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
MONITORING f, INSPECTION OF
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
REQUIRES INSPECTION OF LINERS DURING CONSTRUCTION ALSO
REQUIRES WEEKLY AND AFTER STORM INSPECTIONS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS).
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT
WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
EMERGENCY REPAIRS 5 CONTINGENCY
PLANS; SURFACE IMPOUND
SPECIFIES WHEN AND HOW SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS SHOULD BE
REMOVED FROM SERVICE FOR REPAIRS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS).
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT
WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
CLOSURE 5 POST-CLOSURE OF SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS
PROVIDES CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS).
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT
WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
SURFACE IMP. REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABLE/REACTIVE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
POTENTAILLY IGNITABLE OR REACTIVEE WASTES THAT ARE STORED OR
TREATED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY IGNITABLE OR
REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE TREATED OR STORED IN
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS). PERTAINS TO SITES
WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT WILL NOT BE (OR
HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
SURFACE IMPOUND REQUIREMENTS
FOR INCOMPATIBLE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
POTENTAILLY INCOMPATIBLE WASTES THAT ARE STORED OR TREATED
IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE
HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS). PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE
SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT
BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS OF
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
ALLOWS OHIO EPA OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED OR STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (LAGOONS).
PERTAINS TO SITES WHICH HAVE SURACE IMPOUNDMENTS THAT
WILL NOT BE (OR HAVE NOT BEEN) CLEAN CLOSED.
3745-56-51
DESIGN S OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
FOR WASTE PILES
SPECIFIES THE DESIGN AND OPERATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
PILES INCLUDES LINER SYSTEM, LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL
SYSTEM, WIND DISPERSAL PREVENTION AND RUN-ON/RUN-OFF
CONTROL.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
A,B
A,B
MONITORING S INSPECTION OF WASTE
PILES
WASTE PILE REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABLE/REACTIVE WASTES
WASTE PILES MUST BE MONITORED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION.
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
POTENTAILLY IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE
STORED OR TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY IGNITABLE OR
REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE EITHER STORED OR
TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
WASTE PILE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES
PRESENTS GENERAL PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN WHEN DEALING WITH
POTENTAILLY INCOMPATIBLE WASTES THAT ARE STORED OR TREATED
IN WASTE PILES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE
HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN
WASTE PILES.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
CLOSURE S, POST-CLOSURE CARE FOR
WASTE PILES
SPECIFIES CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE REQUIREMENTS FOR
WASTE PILES.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS FOR
WASTE PILES
ALLOWS OHIO EPA THE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT WASTE PILES
DURING CONSTRUCTION.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
EITHER STORED OR TREATED IN WASTE PILES.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS, LAND BASED UNITS
SPECIFIES LOCATION, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE AND CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDFILLS, WASTE
PILES, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION
WELLS.
PERTAINS TO ALL STIES THAT EITHER HAVE OR WILL HAVE AT
LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING UNITS ON-SITE LANDFILLS,
WASTE PILES, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, LAND TREATMENT
FACILITIES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS (THIS
INCLUDES EXISTING LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION).
LANDFILL DESIGN AND OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS
PRESENTS DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDFILLS
INCLUDES LINER, LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL,
RUN-ON/RUN-OFF CONTROL, ETC.
PERTAINS TO ALL STIES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED THIS RULE ALSO PERTAINS TO EXISTING
LAND BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
MONITORING AND INSPECTIONS OF
LANDFILLS
REQUIRES INSPECTION OF LANDFILLS DURING CONSTRUCTION OR
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED. THIS RULE PERTAINS TO EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
LANDFILL CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
CARE
SPECIFIES CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS INCLUDES FINAL COVER AND
MAINTENANCE.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED. THIS RULE PERTAINS TO EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
LANDFILL REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABLE/REACTIVE WASTES
PROHIBITS THE DISPOSAL OF IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE IN A
LANDFILL, UNLESS THE WASTE IS TREATED, RENDERED OR MIXED SO
THAT THE RESULTANT MATERIAL NO LONGER MEETS THE DEFINITION OF
IGNITABLE OR REACTIVE WASTE.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH POTENTIALLY IGNITABLE OR
REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE LANDFILLED.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
LANDFILL REQUIREMENTS FOR
INCOMPATIBLE WASTES
PROHIBITS THE DISPOSAL OF INCOMPATABLE WASTE IN THE SAME CELL
OF A LANDFILL.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH POTENTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE
HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE LANDFILLED.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
LANDFILL REQUIREMENTS FOR BULK S
CONTAINERIZED LIQUIDS
THE PLACEMENT OF BULK OR NON-CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS
WASTE OR HAZARDOUS WASTES CONTAINING FREE LIQUIDS (WHETHER
OR NOT ABSORBANTS HAVE BEEN ADDED) IN ANY LANDFILL IS
PROHIBITED.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE
OR HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINING FREE LIQUIDS ARE
CONSIDERED FOR LANDFILLING.
A,B
LANDFILL REQUIREMENTS FOR
CONTAINERS
UNLESS THEY ARE VERY SMALL, CONTAINERS MUST EITHER BE AT
LEAST 908 FULL WHEN PLACED IN THE LANDFILL OR
CRUSHED/SHREDDED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT IN THE LANDFILL.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED AND CONTAINERS ARE TO BE DISPOSED OF IN
THE LANDFILL.
DISPOSAL OF SMALL CONTAINERS OF
HAZ WASTES IN OVERPACKS
LAB PACKS CONTAINING HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE PLACED IN A
LANDFILL IF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED AND LAB PACKS ARE TO BE PLACED IN THE
LANDFILL.
LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS
ALLOWS OHIO EPA OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT LANDFILL DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL BE EXPANDED. THIS RULE PERTAINS TO EXISTING
LAND-BASED AREAS OF CONTAMINATION.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR "F"
WASTES IN LANDFILLS
PROHIBITS THE PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES F020, F021, F022
F023, F026 AND F027 IN LANDFILLS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH A HAZARDOUS WASTE
LANDFILL WILL EITHER BE LOCATED OR AN EXISTING LANDFILL
WILL OF EXPANDED AND F-WASTES ARE BEING CONSIDERED FOR
LANDFILLING.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
WASTE ANALYSIS FOR INCINERATORS
REQUIRES WASTE ANALYSIS BE PERFORMED FOR TRIAL BURN AND FOR
NORMAL OPERATION OF INCINERATOR.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
3745-57-44
PRINCIPAL ORGANIC HAZARDOUS
CONSTITUENTS; INCINERATORS
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
INCINERATORS
INCINERATOR TRIAL BURNS
ALTERNATIVE DATA
ESTABLISHES METHOD BY WHICH POHCS WILL BE SPECIFIED.
SPECIFIES PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THAT ALL INCINERATORS MUST
MEET (DESTRUCTION REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, HCL EMISSIONS,
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS).
REQUIRES TRIAL BURN TO DETERMINE FINAL OPERATING CONDITIONS.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
ACTION
CHEMCIAL
3745-57-45
INCINERATOR OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS
MONITORING AND INSPECTION OF
INCINERATORS
SPECIFIES GENERAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
INCINERATORS.
REQUIRES THE MONITORING OF CERTAIN PARAMETERS ON A
CONTINUOUS BASIS AND INSPECTIONS OF EQUIPMENT.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
ACTION
CHEMCIAL
CLOSURE OF INCINERATORS
REQUIRES THAT ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
RESIDUES BE REMOVED FROM THE INCINERATOR SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WILL INCORPORATE
INCINERATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS FOR MISC UNITS
MONITORING, INSPECTING, ANALYZING,
FOR MISC UNITS
ESTABLISHES LOCATION, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE AND CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR MISCELLANEOUS
UNITS USED TO TREAT, STORE OR DISPOSE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES.
REQUIRES THAT MONITORING, ANALYSIS, INSPECTION, RESPONSE,
REPORTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION BE CONDUCTED AS NECESSARY
AT MISCELLANEOUS UNITS TO ASSURE THAT HUMAN HEALTH AND THE
ENVIRONMENT ARE PROTECTED.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES
TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES IN
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES
TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES IN
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS.
ACTION
CHEMCIAL
POST-CLOSURE CARE FOR MISC
DISPOSAL UNITS
REQUIRES POST-CLOSURE CARE OF MISCELLANEOUS UNITS THAT ARE
DISPOSAL UNITS AND OF TREATMENT OR STORAGE MISCELLANEOUS
UNITS THAT THAT LEAVE CONTAMINATED SOILS OR GROUND WATER
AFTER CLOSURE.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES
TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES IN
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS.
PROHIBITIONS, HAZARDOUS WASTE
BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
STANDARDS FOR GENERATORS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
DESCRIBES THE TYPES OF FURNACES, BOILERS OR CEMENT KILNS IN
WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE MAY BE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY.
ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
WHICH IS USED AS A FUEL OR USED TO PRODUCE A FUEL. ALSO
ESTABLISHES STANDARDS FOR GENERATORS WHO ARE ALSO BURNERS
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BTU
VALUE AND MAY BE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BTU
VALUE AND MAY BE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE.
3745-58-46
A,C,D,E
C,E
A,B
STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO BURNERS
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
HAZARD WASTES RESTRICTED FROM
LAND DISPOSAL-EXCEPTIONS
DILUTION PROHIBITED AS A SUBSTITUTE
FOR TREATMENT
SPECIFIES THE OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
AND BOILERS THAT BURN HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL.
LISTS TYPE OF RESTRICTED WASTES THAT MAY BE LAND DISPOSED
LISTS TYPE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES NOT SUBJECT TO LDRs.
PROHIBITS DILUTION OF A RESTRICTED WASTE OR THE RESIDUAL FROM
TREATMENT OF A RESTRICTED WASTE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR
ADEQUATE TREATMENT IN ORDER TO LAND DISPOSE HAZARDOUS
WASTE. DILUTION OF WATER WASTES IS NOT IMPERMISSIBLE DILUTION
UNLESS A METHOD HAS BEEN SPECIFIED AS A TREATMENT STANDARD.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BTU
VALUE AND MAY BE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES DISPOSAL
OF HAZARDOUS WASTES ON-SITE.
PERTAINS TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES DISPOSAL
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE.
3745-59-04
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
EXEMPTION
WASTES PROHIBITED FROM LAND DISPOSAL MAY BE TREATED IN A
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PROVIDED THAT THE CONDIDTIONS STATED IN
PARAGRAPH A ARE MET.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH ON-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTES
WILL BE TREATED IN A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT.
WASTE ANALYSIS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
GENERATOR SHALL TEST THE WASTE OR TEST AN EXTRACT OF THE
WASTE ACCORDING TO THE FREQUENCY AND TEST METHODS
DESCRIBED IN THE RULES, TO DETERMINE IF THE WASTE IS RESTRICTED
FROM LAND DISPOSAL.
PERTAINS TO AN ALTERNATIVE THAT INCORPORATES DISPOSAL
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE.
SPECIAL RULES REGARDING WASTE
THAT EXHIBIT A CHARACTERISTIC
PROHIBITS LAND DISPOSAL OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE UNLESS THE
WASTE COMPLIES WITH THE TREATMENT STANDARDS OF LISTED
WASTES IF THE WASTE IS BOTH LISTED AND EXHIBITS A
CHARACTERISTIC, THE TREATMENT STANDARD FOR THE LISTED WASTE
WILL OPERATE IN LIEU OF THE STANDARD FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC
WASTE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE DISPOSAL OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
3745-59-41
A,B,C,D
A,D,E,F
WASTE SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS
DIOXIN WASTE PROHIBITIONS
CALIFORNIA LIST WASTES PROHIBITIONS
A,B,C,D,E,F,G FIRST THIRD WASTES PROHIBITIONS
A,H
A,B,C
SECOND THIRD WASTES PROHIBITIONS
THIRD THIRD WASTES PROHIBITIONS
APPLICABILITY OF TREATMENT
STANDARDS
TREATMENT STANDARDS AS
CONCENTRATIONS IN WASTE EXTRACTS
TREATMENT STANDARDS EXPRESSED
AS SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
PROHIBITS SPENT SOLVENT WASTES OR CONTAMINATED SOIL AND
DEBRIS RESULTING FROM A RESPONSE ACTION UNDER CERCLA OR RCRA
TO BE LAND DISPOSED UNLESS GENERATOR MEETS TREATMENT
STANDARDS (3745-59-40 TO 44) OR HAS BEEN GRANTED AN EXTENSION
OR EXEMPTION.
PROHIBITS ON-SITE DISPOSAL OF DIOXIN WASTE UNLESS IT MEETS
TREATEMENT STANDARDS OF RULES 3745-59-40 TO 44 OR THE
GENERATOR HAS BEEN GRANTED AN EXTENSION OR EXEMPTION.
PROHIBITS LAND DISPOSAL OF FOLLOWING WASTES:
1. LIQUID WASTES WITH PH <2 OR PH = 2
2. LIQUID WASTES CONTAINING PCBs WITH CONC = 50 OR CONC > 50
PPM
3. LIQUID WASTES WITH HALOGENATED ORGANIC LOADING OF > OR =
1000mg/l AND LESS THAN 10,000 mg/1.
PROHIBITS ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF FIRST THIRD WASTES UNLESS
REQUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPHS D,E,F,G ARE MET.
PROHIBITS ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF SECOND THIRD WASTES UNLESS
REQUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPHS D,E,F,G ARE MET.
PROHIBITS ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF THIRD THIRD WASTES UNLESS
REQUIREMENTS OF PARAGRAPHS D,E,F,G ARE MET.
PROHIBITS ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF RESTRICTED WASTE UNLESS
THE WASTE IS TESTED USING TEST METHOD IN THE APPENDIX TO RULE
OAC 3745-21-24 OR THIS RULE AND THE CONCENTRATION OF ANY
HAZARDOUS CONSITUENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE CONCENTRATION
SHOWN IN TABLE CCWE OF RULE 3745-59-41 OR TABLE CCW OF RULE
3745-59-43. A WASTE TREATED USING A TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIED
UNDER RULE 3745-59-42 OR EQUIVALENT MAY BE LAND DISPOSED.
RESTRICTED WASTE SHOULD BE TREATED TO CONCENTRATION LEVELS
SPECIFIED IN THIS RULE USING TEST METHOD IN THE APPENDIX TO RULE
3745-51-24 OR THE APPENDIX TO RULE 3745-59-40.
ESTABLISHES TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE
CONTAINING PCBs, NON-LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINING
HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (HOCs) AND LAB PACKS
RADIOACTIVE HAZARDOUS MIXED WASTES ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
TREATMENT STANDARDS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
DIOXIN WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
PCB OR HOC CONTAMINATED WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
FIRST THIRD HAZARDOUS WASTES IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
SECOND THIRD HAZARDOUS WASTES IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
THIRD THIRD HAZARDOUS WASTES IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
RESTRICTED WASTE MAY BE AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE LAND DISPOSAL OF
RESTRICTED WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE TREATMENT AND
DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINING EITHER PCB
LIQUID WASTE OR HOC NON-LIQUID WASTE MIGHT TAKE PLACE.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
ACTION
CHEMICAL
3745-59-43 A,B,C
IDENTIFIES THE RESTRICTED WASTES AND THE CONCENTRATIONS OF
THEIR ASSOCIATED HAZARDOUS CONSITUENTS WHICH MAY NOT BE
EXCEEDED BY THE WASTE OR TREATMENT RESIDUAL FOR THE
ALLOWABLE LAND DISPOSAL OF SUCH WASTE OR RESIDUAL.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH ON-SITE TREATMENT AND
DISPOSAL OF RESTRICTED WASTE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
A,B,C,D,E
PROHIBITION ON STORAGE OF
RESTRICTED WASTE
PROHIBITS ON-SITE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTES RESTRICTED
FROM LAND DISPOSAL BEYOND A SPECIFIED TIME FRAME STATED IN
THE RULE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE IN WHICH STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE WILL OCCUR ON-SITE TO FACILITATE PROPER RECOVERY.
TREATMENT OR DISPOSAL IN SOME CASES STORAGE OF
RESTRICTED WASTES BEYOND ONE YEAR IS ALLOWED.
A,B
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD
OWNER SHALL CLOSE FACILITY IN MANNER THAT MINIMIZES NEED FOR
FURTHER MAINTENANCE AND REDUCES OR ELIMINATES POLLUTION OF
GROUND WATER, SURFACE WATER OR ATMOSHPERE.
CONSIDER FOR REMEDIAL PLANS THAT MAY REQUIRE EXTENDED
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT. CONSIDER
ALTERNATIVES WITH LESS LONG TERM OSM. APPLICABLE FOR
RCRA FACILITIES, APPROPRIATE AND RELEVANT FOR OTHER
SITES.
3745-81-11
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS -
LEAD
MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS FOR
INORGANIC CHEMICALS
THE AMBIENT QUALITY STANDARD FOR LEAD SHALL BE A MAXIMUM
ARITHMETIC MEAN OF 1.5 MICROGRAMS PER CUBIC METER DURING ANY
CALENDAR QUARTER.
PRESENTS MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS FOR INORGANICS.
CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE INCINERATION OR WASTE FUEL
RECOVERY MAY TAKE PLACE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
A,E
MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS FOR
ORGANIC CHEMICALS
MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVELS FOR
TURBIDITY
MAXIMUM MICROBIOLOGICAL
CONTAMINANT LEVELS
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANT
SAMPLING S ANALYTICAL REQ
TUBIDITY CONTAMINANT SAMPLING S,
ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS
INORGANIC CONTAMINANT MONITORING
REQUIREMNENTS
PRESENTS MCLS FOR ORGANICS.
PRESENTS MCLS FOR TURBIDITY.
PRESENTS MCLS FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS.
PRESENTS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS.
PRESENTS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TURBIDITY
PRESENTS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR INORGANIC
CONTAMINANTS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
A,E
A,E
ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
PRESENTS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS.
PRESENTS GENERAL ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR MCLS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
3745-81-71
REQUIREMENTS FOR A VARIANCE FROM
MCLS
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNIQUE
VARIANCE
SANITARY SURVEYS
GEN REQ FOR FILTRATION S
DISINFECTION FOR SURFACE WATER
DISINFECTION OF WATER FROM
SURFACE WATER SOURCES
FILTRATION OF WATER FROM SURFACE
WATER SOURCES
TURBIDITY AND DISINFECTION MONIT
REQ. FOR SURFACE WATER
LOCATION/SITING OF NEW GW WELLS
PROVIDES CRITERIA BY WHICH DIRECTOR MAY GRANT VARIANCE FROM
MCLS.
ALLOWS FOR THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES TO
ATTAIN MCLS.
SANITARY SURVEY REQUIREMENTS FOR SITES WHICH DO NOT COLLECT
FIVE OR MORE ROUTINE TOTAL COLIFORM SAMPLES PER MONTH.
TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR GIARDIA LAMBLIA, VIRUSES,
HETEROTROPHIC PLATE COUNT BACTERIA, LEGIONELLA, TURBIDITY.
DISINFECTION REQUIREMENTS AND TREATMENT OF SURFACE WATER.
CONVENTIONAL FILTRATION, SLOW SAND FILTRATION, OR OTHER
FILTRATION TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR TREATMENT OF SURFACE
WATER.
TURBIDITY AND DISINFECTION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR
SURFACE WATER SYSTEMS.
MANDATES THAT GROUND WATER WELLS BE:
A) LOCATED AND MAINTAINED SO AS TO PREVENT CONTAMINANTS
FROM ENTERING WELL.
B) LOCATED SO AS TO BE ACCESSIBLE FOR CLEANING AND
MAINTENANCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND OR
SURFACE WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE
POTENTIAL FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED SURFACE
WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED SURFACE
WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE POTENTIAL
FOR USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED SURFACE
WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED SURFACE
WATER THAT IS EITHER BEING USED, OR HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
USE, AS A DRINKING WATER SOURCE.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
ACTION
CHEMICAL
ACTION
CHEMICAL
LOCATION
ACTION
A1,B-H
A,B,D,E
CASING REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW GW
WELLS
SPECIFIES MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW GROUND
WATER WELLS IN REGARDS TO CASING MATERIAL, CASING DEPTH,
POTABLE WATER, ANNULAR SPACES, USE OF DRIVE SHOE, OPENINGS
TO ALLOW WATER ENTRY, CONTAMINANT ENTRY.
ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WELL CASINGS, SUCH AS
SUITABLE MATERIAL, DIAMETERS AND CONDITION.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES.
SURFACE DESIGN OF NEW GW WELLS
ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC SURFACE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND, WELL VENTS, WELL PUMPS. ETC.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ( OAC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
START UP S OPERATION OF GW WELLS
REQUIRE DISINFECTION OF NEW WELLS AND USE OF POTABLE WATER
FOR PRIMING PUMPS.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES.
A,C,D1,E-G
MAINTENANCE f, OPERATION OF GW
WELLS
ESTABLISHES SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE AND MODIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR CASING, PUMP AND WELLS IN GENERAL.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975, WOULD PERTAIN DURING THE FS IF NEW WELLS ARE
CONSTRUCTED FOR TAEATABILITY STUDIES.
3745-9-11
ABANDONMENT OF TEST HOLES S, GW
WELLS
USE OF WELLS FOR DISPOSAL
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF USE, WELLS AND TEST HOLES SHALL BE
COMPLETELY FILLED WITH GROUT OR SIMILAR MATERIAL OR SHALL BE
MAINTAINED IN COMPLIANCE OF ALL REGULATIONS.
NO PERSON SHALL USE ANY WELL TO INJECT OR REINJECT ANY
SUBSTANCE INTO THE GROUND WITHOUT NECESSARY PERMITS.
PERTAINS TO ALL GROUND WATER WELLS ON THE SITE THAT
EITHER WILL BE INSTALLED OR HAVE BEEN INSTALLED SINCE FEB.
15, 1975.
MAY PERTAIN TO SYSTEMS THAT ENTAIL INJECTION OR
REINJECTION OF FLUID INTO THE GROUND. CONSIDER FOR IN-SITU
BIOREMEDIATION, SOIL FLUSHING AND GROUND WATER PLUME
CONTAINMENT.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO REVISED CODE (ORC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
ENDANGERED PLANT SPECIES
PROHIBITS VIOLATION OF AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL RULES
PROHIBITS EMISSION OF AN AIR CONTAMINANT IN VIOLATION SEC.
3704 OR ANY RULES, PERMIT, ORDER OR VARIANCE ISSUED
PURSUANT TO THAT SECTION OF THE ORC.
Applies to remediatiON-SITEs where chemicals may harm endangered
species. Clearly establishes that receptor plant species must be
considered in risk assessments. This act may require consideration of
endangered species in remediations that involve movement or
displacement of large volumes of surface soil.
MAY PERTAIN TO ANY SITE WHERE EMISSIONS OF AN AIR
CONTAMINANT OCCURS EITHER AS A PRE-EXISTING CONDITION OF
THE SITE OR AS A RESULT OF REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES SHOULD OF
CONSIDERED FOR VIRTUALLY ALL SITES.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
DEMOLITION DEBRIS FACILITIES-VIOLATIONS
PROHIBITED
PROHIBITS VIOLATIONS OF ANY SECTION OF CHAPTER 3714
CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS DISPOSAL
FACILITIES OR ANY RULE OR ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO IT.
DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT
AUTHORIZATION.
PERTAINS TO CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS FACILITIES
WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE OR HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS HAVE
COME TO BE LOCATED. CONSIDER FOR SITES WHERE REMEDIAL
ACTION WILL INCLUDE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES OR ASBESTOS
HAS COME TO BE LOCATED.
EXEMPTIONS TO SOLID 5 HAZ. WASTE T/S/D
REQUIREMENTS
"DIGGING" WHERE HAZ OR SOLID WASTE
FACILITY WAS LOCATED
PROVIDES AUTHORITY AND CONDITIONS BY WHICH THE DIRECTOR
MAY EXEMPT ANY PERSON FROM PERMITTING OR OTHER
REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING THE GENERATION, STORAGE,
TREATMENT, TRANSPORT OR DISPOSAL OF SOLID OR HAZARDOUS
WASTE.
FILLING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, BUILDING, DRILLING OR MINING ON
LAND WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE OR SOLID WASTE FACILITY WAS
OPERATED IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FROM
THE DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO EPA.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH SOLID OR HAZARDOUS WASTE
HAS COME TO BE LOCATED. CERTAIN ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE
EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY UNCOVER SOLID AND/OR
HAZARDOUS WASTE. SHOULD THOSE ACTIVITIES REQUIRE THE
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTES ON-SITE, AN
EXEMPTION TO PERMITTING AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS MAY BE
WARRANTED.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS OR SOLID WASTE
HAS COME TO BE LOCATED CERTAIN ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE
EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES WHICH MAY UNCOVER SOLID AND/OR
HAZARDOUS WASTE. SHOULD THOSE ACTIVITIES REQUIRE THE
MANAGEMENT OF SOLID/HAZARDOUS WASTES ON-SITE, AN
EXEMPTION TO PERMITTING AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS MAY BE
WARRANTED.
LOCATION
ACTION
AIR EMISSIONS FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
FACILITIES
NO HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY SHALL EMIT ANY PARTICULATE
MATTER, DUST, FUMES, GAS, MIST, SMOKE, VAPOR OR ODOROUS
SUBSTANCE THAT INTERFERS WITH THE COMFORTABLE ENJOYMENT
OF LIFE OR PROPERTY OR IS INJURIOUS TO PUBLIC HEALTH.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
MANAGED SUCH THAT AIR EMISSIONS MAY OCCUR. CONSIDER
FOR SITES THAT WILL UNDERGO MOVEMENT OF EARTH OR
INCINERATION.
PROHIBITS OPEN DUMPING OR BURNING
PROHIBITS OPEN BURNING OR OPEN DUMPING OF SOLID WASTE OR
TREATED OR UNTREATED INFECTIOUS WASTE.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE AT WHICH SOLID WASTE HAS COME TO BE
LOCATED OR WILL BE GENERATED DURING A REMEDIAL ACTION
EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING
REQUIRES EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PLANS FOR SANITARY
LANDFILLS AND PROVIDES AUTHORITY TO THE DIRECTOR OF OHIO
EPA TO ORDER AN OWNER OR OPERATar OF A FACILITY TO
IMPLEMENT AN EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN.
PERTAINS TO ALL SANITARY LANDFILLS EXCEPT FOR THOSE THAT
DISPOSED OF NONPUTRESCIBLE WASTES.
LOCATION
ACTION
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY INSTALLATION AND OPERATION
PERMIT SHALL NOT BE APPROVED UNLESS IT PROVES THAT THE
FACILITY REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT, CONSIDERING THE STATE OF AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY, THE
NATURE AND ECONOMICS OF VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES AND OTHER
PERTINENT CONSIDERATIONS.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS COME
TO BE LOCATED AND/OR AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF MAY FUNCTION AS SITING
CRITERIA.
-------
ADMINIS.
CODE
SECTION
OHIO REVISED CODE (ORC) ARARs
REILLY TAR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
PERTINENT
PARAGRAPH
TITLE OR SUBJECT
OF REGULATION
DESCRIPTION
OF REGULATION
APPLICATION
OF REGULATION
ARAR
TYPE
(D)6,d,g,h HAZARDOUS WASTE SITING CRITERIA
(D),6,d. A HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY INSTALLATION AND
OPERATION PERMIT SHALL NOT BE APPROVED UNLESS IT PROVES
THAT THE FACILITY
REPRESENTS THE MINIMUM RISK OF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
(1)CONTAMINATION OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATERS
(11) FIRES OR EXPLOSIONS FROM TREATMENT, STORAGE OR DISPOSAL
METHODS
(ill)ACCIDENT DURING TRANSPORTATION
(Iv) IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFTEY
(v) AIR POLLUTION
(vl) SOIL CONTAMINATION
(D)6,g,h. PROHIBITS THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS FOR TREATMENT,
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTE:
(1) WITHIN 2000 FEET OF ANY RESIDENCE, SCHOOL, HOSPITAL, JAIL
OR PRISON;
(11) ANY NATURALLY OCCURRING WETLAND
(111)ANY FLOOD HAZARD AREA
(Iv) WITHIN ANY STATE PARK OR NATIONAL PARK OR RECREATION
AREA
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS COME
TO BE LOCATED AND/OR AT WHICH HAZARDOUS WILL BE
TREATED, STORED OR DISPOSED OF MAY FUNCTION AS SITING
CRITERIA.
ACTION
LOCATION
3734.It.I
CONDITIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF ACUTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE
PROHIBITS DISPOSAL OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTE UNLESS IT: (1)
CANNOT BE TREATED, RECYCLED OR DESTROYED, (2) HAS BEEN
REDUCED TO ITS LOWEST LEVEL OF TOXICITY, AND (3) HAS BEEN
COMPLETELY ENCAPSULATED OR PROTECTED TO PREVENT LEACHING.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHERE ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS
COME TO BE LOCATED.
CHEMICAL
ACTION
PROHIBITION OF NUISANCES
PROHIBITS NOXIOUS EXHALATIONS OR SMELLS AND THE
OBSTRUCTION OF WATERWAYS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT MAY HAVE NOXIOUS SMELLS OR
MAY OBSTRUCT WATERWAYS.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
PROHIBITION OF NUISANCES
CONSERVANCY DISTRICTS
ACTS OF POLLUTION PROHIBITED
PROHIBITION AGAINST THROWING REFUSE, OIL, OR FILTH INTO LAKES
STREAMS, OR DRAINS.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF A CONSERVANCY DISTRICT MAY MAKE AND
ENFORCE RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CHANNELS,
DITCHES, PIPES, SEWERS. ETC.
POLLUTION OF WATERS OF THE STATE IS PROHIBITED.
PERTAINS TO ALL SITES LOCATED ADJACENT TO LAKES, STREAMS,
OR DRAINS.
THIS STATUTE PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT MAY AFFECT A
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN A CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED ON-SITE
GROUND OR SURFACE WATER OR WILL HAVE A DISCHARGE TO
ON-SITE SURFACE OR GROUND WATER.
ACTION
CHEMICAL
RULES REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL
EFFLUENT STDS
ESTABLISHES REGULATIONS REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL
EFFLUENT STANDARDS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH WILL HAVE A POINT SOURCE
DISCHARGE.
INJECTION OF SEWAGE OR WASTES INTO WELLS
ESTABLISHES A REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR THE INJECTION OF
WASTES INTO WELLS THAT PREVENTS THE CONTAMINATION OF
UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE THAT EITHER HAS OR INTENDS TO INJECT
WASTES OF ANY TYPE INTO WELLS.
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
DUTY TO COMPLY
PROHIBITS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS
6111.01 TO 6111.08 OR ANY RULES PERMIT OR ORDER ISSUED
UNDER THOSE SECTIONS.
PERTAINS TO ANY SITE WHICH HAS CONTAMINATED GROUND
WATER OR SURFACE WATER OR WILL HAVE A DISCHARGE TO
ON-SITE SURFACE OR GROUND WATER.
-------
APPENDIX B
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
(Index and Documents)
FOR THE
REILLY TAR A CHEMICAL CORP. SUPERFUND SITE
DOVER, OHIO
APRIL 1991
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region V
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
-------
04/27/91
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
WILLY TAR & CHEMICAL CORP. SUPERFUND SITE
DOVER, OHIO
FICHE/FRAME PAGES DATE TITLE
16 90/05/18 Administrative Order
By Consent Pursuant to
complete emergency
removal activities at
the site
5 84/04/30 Preliminary Assessment
Report
100 85/12/06 Inspection Report for
Reilly Tar and Chemical
Corporation
190 86/11/19 Hazard Ranking System
scoring Package with
attachments
29 89/09/26 Revised Analytical
Report Proj.# 88WT08
88 89/12/00 Health and Safety
Plan RI/FS
42 90/03/00 Community Relations
Plan for Reilly Tar
& Chemical site
70 90/04/26 Work Plan for
Expedited Response
Action for Surficial
Contamination at the
Reilly Tar & Chemical
CorporatiON-SITE
204 90/08/00 Expedited Response
Action Report for
Removal of Surficial
Contamination
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
DOCUMENT TYPE
U.S. EPA - Niedersgang,N. Reilly Tar & Chem. Pleadings/Orders
Corp.
McCoy,N. - U.S. EPA
CN2N HILL
Ecology & Environment
U.S. EPA
Wadsworth/Alert
LaboraTaries, Inc.
ENSR Consulting and
Engineering
U.S. EPA
McCoy,N. - Ohio EPA Reports/Studies
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
Reports/Studies
Reports/Studies
Omara,M.& Weston,R. Reports/Studies
Reilly Industries, Reports/Studies
Inc.
Reports/Studies
Quillin Excavating Co. Reilly Industries, Reports/Studies
Reilly Industries, Inc. Inc.
ENSR Consulting and
Engineering
Reilly Tar & Chem. Reports/Studies
Corp.
DOCNUMBER
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
-------
04/27/91
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
WILLY TAR & CHEMICAL CORP. SUPERFUND SITE
DOVER, OHIO
FICHE/FRAME PAGES DATE
121 91/01/25
190 91/03/00
161 91/03/00
459 91/04/00
TITLE
Quality Assurance
Project Plan RI/FS
Technical Oversight
Site - Specific
Sampling Plan
RI/FS
Work Plan
RI/FS
Quality Assurance
Project Plan RI/FS
AUTHOR
B&V Waste Science
and Technology Corp.
ENSR Consulting and
Engineering
ENSR Consulting and
Engineering
ENSR Consulting and
Engineering
RECIPIENT
U.S. EPA
Reilly Ter
Chem.Corp.
Reilly
Industries, Inc.
DOCUMENT TYPE
Reports/Studies
Reilly Industries, Reports/Studies
Inc.
Reports/Studies
Reports/Studies
DOCNUMBER
16
17
18
19
-------
DOC# DATE AUTHOR
15 10/01/96 Smith, E., U.S. EPA
16 11/20/96 Smith, E., U.S. EPA
17 12/03/96 Rivers, P., Reilly
Industries, Inc,
18 12/06/96 Rivers, P., Reilly
Industries, Inc.
19 12/10/96 Smith, E., U.S. EPA
RECIPIENT
Rivers, P., Reilly
Industries, Inc.
Rivers, P,, Reilly
Industries, Inc.
Smith, E., U.S. EPA
Smith, E., U.S. EPA
Rivers, P., Reilly
Industries, Inc.
TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES
Letter re: U.S. EPA/Ohio EPA's Final Comments 9
on the August 30, 1996 Feasibility Study
Letter re: Feasibility Study Addendum for the 2
Reilly Tar Site
Letter re: Reilly Tar's Response to U.S. 16
EPA's November 20, 1996 Letter Concerning the
Feasibility Study Addendum
Letter Forwarding Attached Replacement Pages 12
for the Soil Volume Figures to the October
18, 1996 Feasibility Study Addendum
Letter re: Feasibility Study Addendum 2
20
01/00/97 U.S. EPA
Proposed Plan
10
-------
APPENDIX C
STATE OF OHIO LETTER OF CONCURRENCE
State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
STREET ADDRESS: MAILING
ADDRESS:
1800 WaterMark Drive TELE: (614) 644-3020 FAX: (614) 644-2329 P.O.
Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43215-1099
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
April 2, 1997
Mr. William Muno
Regional Administrator
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region V
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590
Dear Mr. Muno:
The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) has received and reviewed the final Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Reilly Tar and Chemical Site in Tuscarawas County, Ohio. The final ROD has incorporated Ohio's
comments dated March 27, 1997.
The Ohio EPA concurs with alternative #3, the selected remedial alternative for this site. The selected
alternative includes the following components:
! Excavation and off-site thermal treatment of drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and
impacted perched zone material from the collection trench installation contaminated with greater than
100 ppm Benzo(a)pyrene toxic eguivalents (B(a)P-TE);
! Off-site disposal of solidified tarry materials, or recycle tarry materials as a fuel or feedstock;
! Excavation and on-site disposal of surface water drainage ditch and river sediments, surface soils and
impacted perched zone material contaminated with less than 100 ppm B(a)P-TE but greater than 5 ppm
B(a)P-TE;
! Construction of an Ohio Subtitle D Solid Waste Cap over on-site disposed materials; a soil cover over
the remainder of the site;
! Hydraulic control and collection of perched ground water;
! Natural attenuation/long-term monitoring of shallow regional ground water;
! Sampling and analysis of sediments in the river to monitor ecological risk to aguatic species; and
! Institutional controls to completely restrict the use of ground water on-site and to restrict the
property to industrial/commercial use.
The estimated net present worth of the selected remedy is $2,810,300. The total estimated operation and
-------
maintenance costs over a 30 year period are $1,431,200.
The Ohio EPA believes that the selected remedy provides the best balance among the alternatives for the
Reilly Tar and Chemical CorporatiON-SITE.
George V. Voinovich, Governor
Nancy P. Hollister, Lt. Governor
Donald R. Schregardus, Director
------- |