Population:
 Type of Community:
     Type of Program:
 Program Start Date:

    In the three years
   since our program
began, an average of
         87 percent of
        residents have
  requested 32-gallon
   cans—the smallest
         size we offer.
                                                                                       EPA530-F-97-007d
                          PAY- AS- YOU-THROW   SUCCESS  STORIES
                          San   Jose,   California
850,000

Urban

Four-sort

July 1993
 We worked  to educate residents away
from the  concept of unlimited  garbage
 toward the idea of unlimited recycling,
                          Getting Started: Why Pay-As-You-Throw?
San Jose is the nation's eleventh largest city.
Our residents are among the most educated
and affluent in the country and represent a
diverse community, with the two largest
minority groups being Latino (27 percent)
and Asian  (14 percent).
Before July 1993, San Jose provided unlimited
weekly garbage collection service at a flat
monthly rate of $12.50 per household.
Residents set out an average of three  32-
gallon garbage cans per week. The city fully
implemented its  Recycle Plus (RP) residential
integrated waste management program for
186,000 single-family dwellings on July  1, 1993.
This program was designed to permit the
city to reach its California Integrated Waste
Management Act goal of 50 percent waste
reduction  by 2000.
The new RP program result-
ed from over 3 years of
planning that included
extensive research on all
major  policy changes.
This program includes a
fully automated garbage
collection system, an
aggressive  PAYT  rate
structure, a four-sort

               recycling system, and a contractor payment
               mechanism which provided financial incen-
               tives that encourage contractors to promote
               recycling.

               Educating the Public
               The public was involved in the design of the
               RP program through a questionnaire mailed
               to all 186,000 households; community meet-
               ings throughout the city; pilot projects in 17
               neighborhoods for collection of yard trim-
               mings and mixed papers; and the use of a
               public review committee to select the firms
               that would be given 6-year collection contracts
               for the collection of garbage and recyclables
               and for recyclables processing.
               A comprehensive public outreach campaign
               aimed at single-family households explained
               the  new variable rates being introduced, the
                   new categories of recyclables being
                              added to the services
                                         provided,


-------

and the benefits of participating.  All
materials were produced in three lan-
guages (English, Spanish, and Vietnamese).
The campaign was guided by the infor-
mation received during a series of focus
groups in the three languages, baseline
and follow-up telephone surveys, and
shopping mall intercept surveys.  More
than  250 community meetings were held
in 1993, and a block leader program and
school education program were
organized.

Getting the Prices Right
Staff began researching unit-pricing
structures for the new  RP program in
the spring of 1992 through surveys and
interviews with successful PAYT com-
munities nationwide. Residents were
offered 32-,  64-, 96-, and 128-gallon
carts with an "aggressive" unit-pricing
structure. This structure provided a
slight price break for each additional 32
gallons of capacity at the 64- and 96-gal-
lon level, which the council considered
important to help residents make the
transition from flat rate to unit pricing.
We had  to ensure that we had  suffi-
cient quantities of wheeled-garbage
carts in the sizes the residents would
request.  We sent out a return-reply
card  to all single-family  households in
January 1993 with our estimated rates,
and let residents know  that no reply
would result in  delivery of the default
32-gallon cart.
Staff was able to work  out a compro-
mise with the city council, which
included offering one of the  most com-
prehensive low-income rate assistance
programs for garbage service in the
state. Criteria were based solely on
household size and income and permit-
ted eligible residents to receive a 30
percent discount on their bill.  About
3,400 households currently participate
in this program.

Managing the Program Costs
The challenge faced by the program is
to both continue and expand its multi-
pronged recycling efforts to meet diver-
sion goals, while  reducing costs to close
the projected $5 million cost-to-revenue
gap in five years. The city already has
reduced costs by over  $4 million annu-
ally through contract renegotiations that
resulted in extending the term of the RP
and yard-trimming collection contracts
from June 1999 to June 2002.


Success: Waste  Reduction
and Increased Recycling
Staff did not anticipate  how quickly resi-
dents would change their recycling  par-
ticipation to accommodate the 32-gallon
size cart, especially since prior to RP the
average set-out was three garbage  cans.
Since RP implementation, an average of
87 percent of residents have requested
the 32-gallon size.
The difference between the "before
and after" garbage set-out volume  could
readily be found in the quantity of  recy-
clables  collected  in the  new RP program.
The volume of recyclables and yard
trimmings being  collected more than
doubled the levels recorded prior to RP.
Most importantly, residents reported
wide satisfaction with the program  and
its results (80 percent in 1993 to 90 per-
cent in 1996. Figures are based on a ran-
dom sample telephone survey).
San Jose's success story was compiled by b Zientek, Supervising Environmental Services
Specialist, (408) 277-5533.

-------